Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Packets - Council Packets (1205)
AGENDA ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL SPECIAL SESSION FEBRUARY 24, 2003 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11,000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE CALL TO ORDER: 4:30 P.M. 1. RESOLUTION NO. (R)03-11 SUPPORT OF THE CANYON DEL ORO AND IRONWOOD RIDGE HIGH SCHOOL COLLABORATION TO CONDUCT "PROJECT GRADUATION — A SAFE AND SOBER GRADUATION CELEBRATION" FOR TOWN OF ORO VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATES 2. AMPHITHEATER SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUEST RELATING TO VOLUNTARY DONATIONS FOR SCHOOLS 3. LAND USE MAPS (TANGERINE-LA CHOLLA 8, 11, 12, 18, 25) 4. COMMUNITY DESIGN Page 43 (continued from 2/6/03) 5. HOUSING Page 89 (continued from 2/6/03) 6. COST OF DEVELOPMENT Page 51 7. OPEN SPACE AND NATURAL RESOURCES Page 110 (continued from 2/6/03) 8. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Page 47 ADJOURNMENT POSTED: 2/19/03 4:45 p.m. Ih TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: February 24, 2003 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & TOWN COUNCIL FROM: Chuck Sweet, Town Manager SUBJ: Resolution (R) 03 - 11 ; Supporting "PROJECT GRADUATION - A Safe and Sober Graduation Celebration program SUMMARY: "Project Graduation" is a drugand alcohol free all-night celebration held on graduation night modeled after the National Grad Night Network which was developed by the U.S. Department of Transportation over twenty years ago. Because the Town of Oro Valley p p anticipates nearly800 teens celebrating graduation in May 2004, the Mayor and Council p have been asked by organizers anizers of"Grad Night" "Project support Graduation —A Safe and Sober Graduation Celebration" program for all high school graduates in May 2004 and all high school graduates thereafter. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution (R) 03 - 11 ; resolution of the Oro Valley Town Council in support of the Canyon Del Oro and Ironwood Ridge High School collaboration to conduct "Project Graduation —A Safe And Sober Graduation Celebration" for Town of Oro Valley high school graduates. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to adopt Resolution No. (R) 03 - 11 ; to approve "Project Graduation —A Safe and Sober Graduation Celebration" program for all high school graduates in May 2004 and all high school graduates thereafter. vow Chuck Sw--t, Town Manager RESOLUTION NO. (R) 03- 11 A RESOLUTION OF THE ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL IN SUPPORT OF THE CANYON DEL ORO AND IRONWOOD RIDGE HIGH SCHOOL COLLABORATION TO CONDUCT "PROJECT GRADUATION—A SAFE AND SOBER GRADUATION CELEBRATION" FOR TOWN OF ORO VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATES WHEREAS, J "Project Graduation" is a drug and alcohol free all-night celebration held onraduation night modeled after the National Grad Night Network which was g g developed bythe Department of Transportation over twenty years ago; and U.S.. p WHEREAS,the Town of Oro Valley anticipates nearly 800 teens celebrating ebrating graduation in May 2004, and anticipates the number of graduates to steadily rise in years to come because of the projected growth of the community; and WHEREAS, currentlyCanyon del Oro High School and Ironwood Ridge High School are located within the town limits of the Town of Oro Valley; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and Council recognize that an organized graduation celebration pro is for all Oro Valley high school graduates in lieu of other�'am necessary celebrations which have statistically resulted in tragic drinking and driving accidents. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona support the"Project Graduation— A Safe and Sober Graduation pp Celebration" ro ram in the interest of assuring a safe and sober graduation celebration p g for all Oro Valley high h school graduates in May 2004 and for high school graduations thereafter. Mayor AND ADOPTED byMa or and Town Council this 24th day of February, 2003. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY ATTEST: Paul H. Loomis, Mayor Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Tobin Sidles, Interim Town Attorney TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: February 24t'', 2003 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: Chuck Sweet, Town Manager SUBJECT: Voluntary Developer)Builder Contributions to Amphitheater Public Schools SUMMARY: Attached is a July 15th, 2002 Letter from Dr. Vicki Balentine, Superintendent of Amphitheater School District, which refers to a program of voluntary donations by developer/builders for support of the construction of new schools within the district. Also, attached to this letter is a copy of the Amphitheater Governing Board's resolution which supports the idea of voluntary contributions. It is my understanding that Dr. Balentine will be present at the Special Session on February 24th to further explain the voluntary donation concept and answer any questions the Town Council may have regarding this program. Attachments: 1. July 15th, 2002 letter from Dr. Vicki Balentine to the Town Manager regarding Voluntary Developer/Builder Contributions to Amphitheater Public Schools. / , Chuck Sweet, Town Manager OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT VickiBalentine,Ph.D. ri% Superintendent (520)696-5205 FAX(520)696-5015 IP . HE - 4•TDD(520 696-5055 701 W.Wetmore Road,Tucson,AZ 85705• (520)696-5000•FAX(520)696 506 ) GOVERNING BOARD MEMBERS Kenneth J.Smith,Ed.D. Mary Schuh Kent Ban-abee,Ph.D. Mike Prout Nancy Young Wright B President Vice President July 15, 2002 Chuck Sweet Town Manager Town of Oro Valley 11000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley, AZ 85737 Re: Voluntary Developer/Builder Contributions to Amphitheater Public Schools Dear Chuck: Thank you again for hostingour valuable meeting last Tuesday with the g representatives of Vistoso Partners to discuss the potential of Town support for developer and builder contributions to the District. p As Mr. Carlier explained, the District recently entered into an agreement with p another developer — which Mr. Curlier also represents — providing that the developer/builder er/builder there will contribute $1,200.00 per lot sold to the school district. The donated funds will be used to augment State Facilities Board construction of school buildings. As you are aware, municipalities are not able to assess impact fees for the p benefit of school districts, according to our state courts. What we propose, however, Town require everydeveloper to satisfy District concerns in order to qualify is that the q p for rezoning approvalby the Town. This practice, we believe, is permissible. developers Contributionsbydevelo ers to the schools help address the serious under- funding of school facilities bythe State of Arizona. Additionally, it can help us avoid mandates bythe State Facilities Board that we modify school boundaries or bus children great approve distances before theya prove new schools where they are needed. In this way, contributions benefit Town residents who desire their children to be educated at neighborhood schools. Amphitheater High•Canyon del Oro High•ironwood Ridge High•Amphitheater Alternative Amphitheater Middle School•Coronado K-8 School•Cross Middle School•La Cima Middle School•Wilson K-8 School Copper Creek Elementary•Donaldson Elementary•Harelson Elementary•Holaway Elementary•Keeling Elementary Mesa Verde Elementary•Nash Elementary•Painted Sky Elementary•Prince Elementary•Rio Vista Elementary•Walker Elementary Rillito Center•El Hogar Page 2 July 15, 2002 q As you requested, I am again enclosing the form of resolution adopted by our pp Governing Board to support the idea of voluntary contributions. I hope the Town Council would look upon favorablyu on a similar resolution of its own. We would also invite the Town joint to hold another meeting between the Council and the Board to discuss this important issue. thankyou verymuch for your support of our schools. I look forward to Again, our continuing discussions. Sincerely, ?1,//rer 'L-'^ r i Vicki Balentine, Ph.D. Superintendent VB/crm RESOLUTION OF THE GOVERNING BOARD OF AMPHITHEATER UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 10 OF PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA, TO REQUEST ST DEVELOPMENT INDUSTRY CONTRIBUTION TO SUPPORT SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION WHEREAS, the Governing Board of Amphitheater Unified School District is charged with providing the best educational opportunity possible for its students; p WHEREAS, the future of Arizona is dependant upon the quality of educational opportunity available to its young people; WHEREAS, the State of Arizona has assumed the responsibility of funding school construction through the Students First legislation; WHEREAS, residential communities may desire school facilities of a level beyond thatp rovided under the Students First legislation; WHEREAS, the provided level of funding for the Students First construction program is not sufficient to totallyfund community educational needs, providing only about 66% of the funding necessary to build schools that are comparable to the District's existing schools and to keep class sizes small; WHEREAS, student enrollment in the Amphitheater School District was twenty percent (20 /°) higher her in 2000 than it was in 1990, and projections show growth continuing; WHEREAS, the difference between funding required to build facilities similar to those already in the District and fundingprovided for Students First construction represents thousands of dollars per new household within the District; WHEREAS, high qualityeducational facilities enrich the residential community they serve; WHEREAS, residential development creates a need for school construction; WHEREAS, high qualityschool facilities within a school district make residential units within that school district more valuable and desirable to buyers; and WHEREAS, developers upon relyu on and in fact market the quality of school facilities serving their developments in their business, WHEREAS, the contribution of developers of even a portion of the cost difference for construction would greatlybenefit their homebuyers and the community new school at large; BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED that the Governing Board of Amphitheater Unified School District NoY . 10 of Pima County, Arizona strongly urges residential builders and developers ers concerned with the quality of education in the communities they build to supportpublic ublic school construction through donations to public schools. Builders and developers whose residential projects will impact school enrollment are encouraged to donate to Amphitheater School District the amount of $1 ,200.00 per unit, therebycontributingtoward a portion of the cost of construction of residential schools o of an appropriate level for the community. Builders and developers of large- scale developments are encouraged velo ments to donate parcels of land suitable for school sites, in lieu of or in addition to monetary contributions. DATED this day of , 2002 Kenneth J. Smith, Ed.D Nancy Young Wright President Vice-President Amphitheater GoverningBoard Amphitheater Governing Board Kent Barrabee, Ph.D. Michael Prout Member Member Amphitheater GoverningBoard Amphitheater Governing Board p 3- 8 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: February 24, 2003 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL FROM: Bryant Nodine, AICP, Planning and Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: DRAFT GENERAL PLAN UPDATE 2020 (OV11-01-04) BACKGROUND: This is the sixth staff report to the Council regarding the draft General Plan Update 2020 recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission on November 19, 2002. The Council meetings to date are: December 2 Study Session December 11 Public Hearing January 6 Public Hearing January 21 Special Session February 3 Special Session February 6 Special Session SUMMARY: The following sections highlight and address the discussions comments and observations of the February 3, 2003 special session. This report provides additional information, for the Council's consideration, on the Community Design, Housing, Arts and Culture, Open Space and Natural Resources Conservation, and Archeological and Historic Resources elements. The report format is as follows: TITLE Comment/Issue (may be after the general discussion) Staff response/discussion Recommended Motion REVIEW OF THE FEBRUARY 6, 2003 SPECIAL SESSION Provide opportunities for art groups in addition to GOVAC and look ahead to new (versus ongoing) activities. Staff will present this in the revised draft based on the Council direction. Recommended Motion: None required. LAND USE MAP Reference maps for the requests were distributed in the January 21 packet. Please bring these maps to the meeting. Abrams Properties (#11 and #12) The land uses for both properties are shown in the request map and in the table below. The Council may want to consider these with the other properties north of Tangerine shown as #25 below. In the previous session, the Council approved a map designating LDR2 immediately to the west (map #7) of the western parcel. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 7 Option 1996 Plan Landowner Steering P&Z /Uses (acres) Request Committee Commission (acres) (acres) (acres) Commercial None None None None Uses Residential RLDR (18) MDR (18) RLDR(18) LDR2 (18) Uses Housing 5 80 5 35 Units Recommended motion: I move to approve the Commission's land use designations. Schall Property (#18) The land uses are shown in the request map and in the table below. Five acres are included on the Church of the Apostles property to reflect the Steering Committee's recommendation for commercial in that area and the subsequent recommendation of the Commission to designate that Public/Semi Public. Option 1996 Plan Landowner Steering P&Z /Uses (acres) Request Committee Commission (acres) (acres) (acres) Commercial None MUN (18) None* MUN (18) Uses Residential RLDR(10) RLDR(5) RLDR(28)* RLDR(10) Uses LDR1 (18) LDR2 (5) MUN (18) Housing 20 100 10 90 Units *This may have been due to an oversight on the map prepared by Staff. Recommended motion: I move to approve the Commission's land use designations. Properties North of Tangerine (#25) The land uses for both properties are shown in the request map and in the table below. The Council may want to consider these with the other properties north of Tangerine shown as #25 below. In the previous session, the Council approved a map showing LDR1 immediately to the east (map #9). TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 3 of 7 Option 1996 Plan Landowner Steering P&Z /Uses (acres) Request Committee Commission (acres) (acres) (acres) Commercial None NA None None Uses Residential RLDR(54) NA RLDR(54) LDR2 (54) Uses Housing 15 NA 15 110 Units Recommended motion: I move to approve the Commission's land use designations. Additional Requests On February 6, Sakellar and Associates submitted two requests (attached): 1. A change from Public/Semi Public to Neighborhood Commercial/Office for approximately 10 acres on the northwest corner of Tangerine and La Cholla. (The Steering Committee had recommended five acres of NCO at this location, but the location with the realignment of La Cholla would have provided only a small two to three acre site.) Recommended Motion: No action. 2. A revised request for MDR on the Townsdin property at the northwest corner of Naranja and La Cholla (map #8). The original request was for NCO on the corner, with open space and MDR. The 1996 Plan designated this area and the surrounding properties as MDR. The Commission and the Steering Committee both recommended LDR1 on this property due to the wash that takes up approximately six of the sixteen acres. The Council discussed this area at the January 21 session with no motion and direction for both MDR and LDR on the property. Option 1996 Plan Landowner Steering P&Z /Uses (acres) Request Committee Commission (acres) (acres) (acres) Commercial None None now, None None Uses originally NCO. Residential MDR (16) MDR (16) LDR1 (16) LDR1 (16) Uses Housing 80 63 16 16 Units (no SRA) With lower densities for the SRA, the MDR provides desnisites that are slightly higher than the properties to the east (2.5 units per acre). The number of units and overall densities are: LDR1 = 16 units; 1 unit per acre TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 4 of 7 LDR2 = 27 units; 1.6 unit per acre MDR= 63 units; 3.8 unit per acre. Recommended motion: I move to approve an MDR designation for the property. COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT (pages 43-46) This is an optional element for the Town to include in its plan; it is not required by state statute, however, it is exists in the current plan. It includes the state required issue of access to incident solar energy from the statutory requirements for land use elements. Nine policies address five key policy issues in addition to the one addressing the required solar issue. All of the key policy issues come directly from the existing plan. They address design standards, site planning, landscaping standards, architectural design standards and signage for the built environment to: • preserve and harmonize with natural areas • be consistent with the surroundings, and • reduce visual clutter The above are addressed by one goal, which in turn, is implemented in the Strategic Implementation Plan by one action item: Update the existing design guidelines to ensure that all policies are being fully addressed. A second goal, solar access, is addressed by ensuring that the standards in the zoning code are enforced. There are no identified short term costs associated with implementing this element of the plan. At the January 21, 2003 special session, council members raised concerns that there was a need to refer to existing documents such as the OVZCR and design guidelines where issues raised in policies had already been addressed. It was also noted that the issues statements include policy language. These concerns are being addressed through the approach approved by the Council on February 3. Recommended Motion: None required. HOUSING ELEMENT (pages 89-92) The Housing Element is required by state statute but only for communities over 50,000 people. Oro Valley has a Housing Element in the existing General Plan. Ten policies under two goals address the two key policy issues: • neighborhood quality, and • the range of housing opportunities. An additional policy addresses the goal of a jobs-to-housing balance in the planning area. The goals and policies are slightly revised from the existing General Plan, but effectively call for the same thing. Implementation is handled by five action items, with the primary change from the existing General Plan being the additional consideration of those with special needs and the creation of a housing-employment database. Short term costs of implementation of the Housing Element are estimated at $5000 of staff time to develop and annually update the housing and employment baseline, with a report every two years. This helps to implement five of the Housing Element policies. At its last meeting, some Council members raised concerns about the jobs-housing balance mentioned in Goal 7.3, issues of affordable housing, and providing a range of housing opportunities. There was also a question that Policies 7.2.1 and 7.2.4 are not effective as they designate no areas on the land use map for TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 5 of 7 elderly and special needs. Council also suggested specifying town homes in Policy 7.2.1 as a more common term for attached housing. The jobs-housing balance and the range-of-housing policies help to prepare the Town for the future when the population exceeds 50,000 and we will be required to have a Housing Element. Services for elderly and special needs populations are the type of land uses contemplated is ideal for the Mixed Use Neighborhood districts. Recommended Motion: None required. However, as staff follows the process approved by the Council on February 3, we may recommend keeping only certain goals and policies from the Housing Element and combining it with another element such as Land Use. COST OF DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT (pages 51-55) The State's Growing Smarter/Plus statutes mandate that all communities in Arizona with a population of over 10,000 prepare and adopt a Cost of Development Element. This is one the new requirements instituted after the Town adopted its 1996 Plan, so the content of the Element is entirely new. Essentially, the Cost of Development is intended to ensure that new development pays for the public infrastructure and services that are required to serve that development. As with other Growing Smarter/Plus elements, this requirement is targeted primarily at high growth areas, with the objective of avoiding public subsidies of private development. The policy content of the Cost of Development Element covers three subject areas: • fair share allocation of costs, • equitable funding mechanisms, and • analyses to support funding mechanisms The Strategic Implementation Plan includes seven Cost of Development actions, most of which are designed to assist the Town in monitoring the costs associated with new development and ensuring that mechanisms are in place to require that new development pays its fair share for the burden that it places on the Town's services and facilities. Only one of these actions is targeted for completion in the short-term: an annexation study that will cost the Town an estimated $25,000 to complete. Another is an annual program to document information related to the Town's infrastructure, both public and private. This program is estimated to cost approximately$5,000 annually. OPEN SPACE AND NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION ELEMENT (pages 110-129) This element is derived from several sources including the existing plan, significant public input and the draft Environmentally Sensitive Lands (ESL) plan. Notably longer than the other plan elements, the last six paragraphs of the opening statement, for example, come from the draft ESL plan. This element satisfies two elements called out in state statutes: the Open Space Element, mandated by the Growing Smarter/Plus statutes and an optional Conservation Element which would be mandatory only for communities over 50,000 people. The Open Space portion covers inventories of open space areas, recreational resources and access points, forecasted needs, policies and strategies for managing and acquiring open space resources, and policies and strategies to promote a regional, integrated open space system. The optional Conservation Element addresses a variety of natural resources, including such issues as wildlife habitat. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 6 of 7 Sixteen key policy issues were identified as part of this element. Four deal with open space; four address habitat issues; and seven address visibility and view sheds. • Need to develop range of open space planning tools • Need for a funding mechanism for acquisition and management of open space • Early creation of a minimally impacted, connected open space system ahead of the development curve • Need to establish new areas of open space based in part on their connectivity with existing system • Concern over fragmented habitat • Impacts of development incompatibility with biological resources • Opportunities for restoration of degraded habitat • Identification of conflict points between existing biotic communities and locations for desirable development • Concern over light, glare and nighttime visibility • Maintaining or enhancing visual character of the Town • Concern over hilltops, ridges and slopes • Identification of important scenic vistas and need for various protection mechanisms • Lighting, signage and design standards to address relationship of built environment to natural environment • Creation of scenic corridors • Concern over air quality for both visibility and health reasons to the extent the Town can address the issue. Each of the three main categories of key issues has at least one goal associated with it. View sheds have two: one to address the overall visual character of the community and the second to address specific visually important areas found in what could be environmentally sensitive areas. The element also has a goal and requisite policies to establish a program to acquire and administer open space. The source material for much of the policy guidance in the element is the work of the ESL advisory committee. Sixty-two policies, significantly more than the Land Use Element have been delineated. This may not be surprising given that the general plan overall has as a fundamental basis protection of the natural environment as the community grows. Eighteen action items in the Strategic Implementation Plan were drafted to implement the element, some of which cross over with the Parks and Recreation Element. Three of the short term action items, not counting the open space prioritization and acquisition program discussed in the February 3, 2003 staff report or use of the grant writer position also previously discussed, account for$30,000 in identified costs. These include: • $5000 in non-recurring staff time for Action OS.2 to review existing PADs to seek ways to minimize environment impacts without negatively impacting property rights • $5000 each in non-recurring staff and consultant time for Action OS.9 to review and amend if necessary the Zoning Code to provide guidelines for wildlife movement, particularly above and below roadways • $25,000 in non-recurring staff time for Action OS.10 to address view character and quality The only specific issue identified at this time is the treatment and definition of the term "open space" throughout the Plan as directed by Council in the February 6 session. Based on previous Council direction, Staff will also edit the background, issues and policies sections. Recommended Motion: None required. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 7 of 7 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT (pages 47-50) The State's Growing Smarter/Plus Statutes do not include any requirements for addressing economic development within general plans, for communities of any size. Thus, the Town's decision to continue to address economic development in its General Plan (the 1996 Plan included an Economic Development Element) is entirely voluntary. Because there is no statutory mandate, the content of the Economic Development Element reflects the specific interests of the Town. Most of the policy content in the Economic Development Element is derived directly from the 1996 General Plan, with modifications reflecting the results of the Town's public outreach process and the deliberations of the General Plan Steering Committee. The policies of the Economic Development Element are principally geared toward supporting the ongoing efforts of the Town's Economic Development Department to: • diversify the economy • provide services and revenues, and • create jobs The implementation actions included in the Strategic Implementation Plan are focused on gathering and maintaining information that will help the Town make well-informed decisions concerning how it asserts it influence over local economic activity. This includes the updating and maintenance of the Town's Community Economic Development Strategy, which is called-out as an action item in the Strategic Implementation Plan. The costs for these actions have been estimated at approximately $35,000 in one- time, short-term costs and $60,000 annually ($50,000 of which would cover the cost of employing a grant writer, a cost duplicated in other elements such as Open Space and Natural Resources). RECOMMENDATIONS: As presented above. Attachments: 1. Letter from Sakellar and Associated dated February 6, 2003 for Church of the Apostles 2. Letter from Sakellar and Associated dated February 6, 2003 with Revised Maps for Request #8 3. Element Short-term/Annual Implementation Tables /7 / 4._ , :- F:\PROJECTS\GP2001\Staff Reports\StudySessionstaffreport#6toTC.doc __, P l anni z Ild Z•ni IA . 'ni strator / . I Com • 'iy Devel•. 'ent Director / i "4 Ts ', Manager Sakellar Associates C N Dino Sakellar,AlA Manuel B Rojo,RA February 6, 2003 Gail A Wright,RA Carlos De Alva.AIT Oro Valley Town Council Nicholas Sakellar. FAIA 11000 North La Canada Drive 1918-1993 Oro Valley,AZ 85737 }2E: General Flan Update Townsdin Property located at Naranja Drive and La Cholla Blvd. Tax Farce! Nos. 224-11-061C and 224-11-061D (+/- 13 acres) Dear Mayor and Council Members: We hereby wish to amend our request for NCO/FOS/MDR to MDR only on the above 100 East Sixth Street referenced parcel. Thank you for your consideration. Tucson,Arizona 85705 tely,tyh ‘S' i♦ voice 520.622.4166 fax 520.629.9952 C.N. Dino Sakellar,AIA Fresident Cc Chuck Townsdin Attachment:11x17 Requested Land Use 2/6/03 sakeliar.corn Architects and Pad G:\2002\0211 Townsdin\OV-Letter2v2.DOC .... , .,- ....,„..jo. 47%'':',--,,,*7.15.11% 4;1•:,''.',,'''.1,4-.' Iti j IT r r (1) n i • 0 st i f. “), 4t, ii','"':' ,-*mr.7711:= ,'":''''',..,i:.'-•',,.-, .•'':yik-.':. ': *,.,:::',,, dl'4 5.-.4 0 = .• ---':';':-i"'., . .-4* tr- * -lc-41 ',-..,. .. '' `. ' .''' .., ,. .-, .-,'-,.,....4. .,,N 0 ,,,,,,,70,‘„,ii,,,,,....,,-;,--,, ,,. '„,..sc.,,,,*,,:iii,.,-...,-,.:„.,-040...i.;:.,,;:.--,,,;••*::,...,:t w.t.:121.4 0 "Cf Z F i IT z if; .-. ...,t4 ' - fi t L4.• ,',.':1--,, I (I) ,'''. g C r r -- '• .; ! 1 A e.-, ., 4.- :•,'...Sii 71)) ,, *I It. ...• 4. ....•.,•..,..,' ; ,. _suit, ,, tI))* U a .--' , r-10 1:1 tn -7"— a (ii) (1) ' .11i's''''''''° '. 'CI'•": -ir'All...' ''''. ' 9- = . , :.„-.', i .3..'•,• .,:.:;tfttL,,,,, —•,,..0. . , 0 z_ E ',,i 2. .10,4 ,;7,,, ' 171.vir:-, 4,0,101F,1,-. .,..4.• -, iv" tZ 0, " ','''''',7-'''' ',••LA , eikrp,':'', ,iir -„,.' - ,,, ' ,,-,...,A .,. .. . hit*" 4tAit ,--,-er..---7' a; Alb.,HA,',..,. lr ,- - :-,4-..... ,-,..„•.-.,,,,,7 ,. -..-•- ,,,,,*,..... A1111-11—'Ara„. ' Oil: '\ w , ° rur,--`,' ""0.%' .'.1',Ay...,..:11'.''A:,.1. ''' '' )11,Ari,'IMF.-'' t'.,, ..1•', AL,,,: , :i. E. ''' ' ..,,, ,, :.4 Zt..,..,.,.::, ,. ,it.7,..,.,....,TV,..,.L, ,,,,,et• ,,,• ,,,,,,. .,,t,,, „„it ...„,._ rill"....,p-i.421,..-i, ''' .1.[...' .''''' ''-,'.7. ' t ,Ar.,'..•••:".'.;:.: 'Lifit,., :ir__-'-, i-...:• '.;!,,..- 411,1'.'. '-,'-- 11. ' ''''''...;,e ,T .., .„-,•:.,,,,,_,,,,,„...„,,,, ,., , .,::,,,„,.....„, ,,,,,:,.... , ,.:„..„.„„"i„,,,.,,,,i,,,,,,„..„,,,,‘ 7 -,;.4,..,-,',.',!' ..... > ,—",7; CA'.,-.1j 2 .-0 ,„'.1',;'',1°•:.:, --,:-7,:. ',' 1 ,,'1,:,11,114.413*,: ,,„..,: • .i,_•:,-.,.,,'4;;;.,, :, 7'7" ,',:;:.i ii',,':,,,;;.',,: •, # r''', ',:,4... 4 -8 lg a 't__I .1.,. ,400,1e,".. ' 1 .,I,,. ,..,. ,,,,az. "Mr.,„ , ,, „ ,. •• .,4,,,,..,,,,.., .,,,,$1 . 'l'''',::-•.:,: ', ''; -:',-;'•---7,'''.„...!mi.7-1,:" . '•,•*."-.".c-..... it;it'''':,-,..;:-,,,. 0 5 ? '11 ,,,, = .:'1".', ..4.-:;-,, :. .', 2%, .„--, ',.:.,-,;,,„ ..„ . 7; • '.!•t,','i,..;::'''' ','.:.,:i:'1.0:''.,::,, ,,_.,,_ 1;:;, . , -, — 1)3 ' N ..--- ----' r (1- e ' , - --:::,,,,4,,,w-,,c,--:: .....--- m.---iff---____________—.......,.. _ a g. „ , ,,' . , _. „,,„, ' - --#-': 4.4.,;.„......rit;,74'...1,' ,..,„,10* ,,0 ... Z 2, --_, >70 "nt .( CI) U) 3 z ,,0 -4, ' L. ' ' : • ,..,,,,,,,, /.7' ',1=' = ", (t) c 5;•-• • Z 9 8 c(L)) T g 31 m 1 - . • ' ' ----- - ' \\\\:,\,, — si • CD 5 5 - 2. N I' ------ ' ..---,. ' \ ..... co ' -o ... o- a) a) ' --,,,,,,,,mw,ir,r7•ir, m gr. g: a) va+,'a CD •• - \--- .,,,/,...„.„.:...:\ CT 0 cr, a:. a) z , r— g [in) > -.. cp — 0 Z .9 a) sD (D m = cn a• . K o 0 0 , c jj m g) „1111111011011.11111.141111011111.111121116. , 7) i ,. „ libleaskribligiam11:sc\\,,,, 1\..) c° i — 11111110101101. -, , • ' ' ' . '411110-11.161106,NM61116.'1161101M ..., 2 a) 0 ci tu "' 1 4 Iii‘k 1 i — lk- I1641§010.114‘.,4„ ... ,- CD 0 i DO a) \\, C , 7. 0 = h111411111116 '' '11111111.0011b..111,WIL186116111114= '-NiKuraiihMilia11116111161116., J I --- K jj 0 r-a ' RN ihi.NO1116W10161111,10611116.16111111121110111LIMINLWIlk- g g C CD !E CD ..._ 1 IlSolsossolorio 41 -1 cr --, - ), P. c) co ,, fi-13, ry :r,- r- 0 0 C3 0 0 t 13 ..... 3 3 Cp C 3 (6 = _ 3 -z-: 2- u) Ii u). .... ,., %) g o u) I _ 5. . . ....• (7,2, -116, I s• � Sakellar Associates rR � C N Dino saheltar,AIA Manuel B Rojo. RA February 6,2005 Gail A Wright.RA Carlos De Alva.AiT Oro Valley Town Council N croias sar:eiiar. FAlA 11000 North La Canada Drive 1918-1993 Oro Valley, AZ 85757 RE: Request for Land Use Designation of NCO/LDR Town of Oro Valley General Flan Update 2020 Church of the Apostles property ert located at the NW corner of Tangerine and La Cholla Tax f arcel No. 219-42-0160 Dear Mayor and Council Members: 100 East Sixth xth stream. On behalf of my client,The Episcopal Diocese of Arizona, I hereby request that the corner T;acor.Arizona 85705 section of the above property ert be designated Neighborhood Commercial/Office (see attached map). This request comes as a result of the Diocese understanding that the intersection of voice 520.622.4166 Tangerine and La Cholla is being designated deli Hated as a major intersection with commercial and mixed use. fax 520.629 9952 Thank you for your consideration. Iely, G.N. Dino Sakellar, AIA president cc Rev.Jamie Conrad Clark Greger Attachments: Requested Land Use drawing sakeliar co Architects and pI � G:\2001\0102 Church of the Apostles\Construction\14-MOV-Letter.DOC •-. 1 1 1 L.5.1 I I I 1 1 1 ____ , -.- i _ RLDR 1 1 1 1 RLDR1 RLDR I I RLDR Episclpal I 'ocese 1 of ,fiora rc,el _________ �- -r , ,_ . , _ . -- LIMEWOOD DRIVE __ __ _ 1' ___ J _- t + t + t + + + t t + + + t t + t + t + t t t + t t + + t + + t t + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + t + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + t + + + + + + 1 LDR2 t + t + t + + + + + + + + t + + + t + + + + + + + + + + + t + + + + + + + + + + + 1 RLD - + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + t + t + + + + t t + t t + + + t + + + + + t + t + + + + t + + + t + + + t + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + t + + + + t t ! + + + + + + + + + + t + t + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ,� + t + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +♦♦♦♦♦♦ I. + + + t t + + t + t + + t t + + + + + + + + + + + t t t + I t▪ + + + + + + + + + +„ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + .♦♦.♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦.♦♦ +++4+4+4+4+4+++4+4+++4,94+++++4%+4+4+4+4+++4+4+4+4+4+++++++++.4 ,,,•••,,. + + + +4.+ + + + + +4.+ + + +4.+4.+ + + + + + + + + + + +4.+++++ ♦♦♦.♦♦♦.. i .♦.♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦.•♦♦♦♦♦♦��.♦.•♦♦♦•♦♦♦♦.♦♦♦♦♦♦♦. 4444. 444 + 4. 44. 4444. 44. 44. 44444444444# ff + + + + + + + + +t+++ ++++t+++++++t++++++++++++++++++++++I��������� �������������������������������4' ���� + + t + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ++▪++++++++++++++++++++ ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦.♦♦♦♦♦♦.♦..♦♦.♦♦. W$ .W,*.*.W#.SSA*s*.*N ♦ ♦♦♦. ♦.♦.♦♦.♦♦♦♦.♦.♦ + + + + + + + + + + + `10, ,w i s . s s s 4 s s s s s 4 4. + + + + + + + + + + + . . . . . . . .. .46. . . ..6.. . + + + + + + + + + + + � . . _ . 1 TANGERINE ROAD ,,,,,,,/, i.,,,__ _ _rillrfr ..: — i I I/-- , , • ,(611.1 • , m : I / / .. / - NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL/OFFICE �/ MUN- MIXED USE NEIGHBORHOOD NCO • • / + + + PSP- PUBLIC/SEMI PUBLIC LDR2- LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL + + + + + + + + RLDR- RURAL LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL REQUEST LAND USE 2/6/03iiii liar sso u ,, ,,, - Sak 1 of 1 xwrcy r ' F:\2001\0102\CotAv2.d wg,02/06/03 03:08:48 PM . • - Z E-0 m m C •w = 0 B N y o- a ? � a, rn r N CD c) ) 0- co n, o 0 --1 Cl) -' O 3 CD °' 0O CD � N N g O OKWO <. Z -� a o N O) O N c D_ ^^ '-' O -4.W WW -' - z (n VJ 0 � � G,, 6 ry 3 -3 C' � p n co co N CJi -� — 'O M D SD ,...'. DJ CD-P W WmO 3.-(2 - < cn n RI- o ) � m — vCD pN (7)-o•o rn� W m — p ci) 0 N -0 n. Q Z QJ Cin m O N N W Q D Q g Zi -I 0 cp0 _ D CD Z Cz -11 C C) — < to 0 o o -, C) Q CSD-0 -I CD 5 = rrn C1 o -Do- CJS CDO-0 CDCD � Z 0-0 73 c2v ©� cD cn v N5 (Dcp - E -0' 00 o Q, CD DECD " 7JCD O > o v cn o o Z < a) a) QO-ops co con Z va v �CD —1 o C v - 0 C (1) CD c-, CD D 0_0_ �- 0 3 m t— CD C CD CO CD -o E. CC c) C') 11 o —3 CD2 D << o r CD 111 d-•Q =51/4Z a) E v0 _..�, -' c) ". o m mho 54--(-7) 0 C Z o" - anio m cr' —I X Ncp -3 (0 CD > > Di o CD __ > o D_ o oa0 71oma 0, cp o - n a) Q 0 -. 0 cD CD O = • U) CD CI-< M Cr) cD N Z o °' al cD to o m --i DC)- a, � U) C CD 3 0. -1 a_02 P-0 s .. o ='CD co .--a) r = o_.o o w —1 —0 i m� �v * o t11 CD Q Cii anima ° o M- 0 - -0,3 _= = CD co cr, cn -0 D D cn CD • 5 0 v)' 0 cn cD m O 5. FD V) 0 x a_ ELT m X 0 -0 X 5 ° p p XP D v 0 Z E �° z E 11 CD <ny co 90 � D —1 CD CD do 73 cn N „7 z1 -.%0 N 3 D O m o -n m CD m m CD m m � � m � m Cn 1 0 C) co n o 0O — O I I �' co co -moi c (T.'v Z -_v c Cl) -I 0 n = . � --i* m rn n a o 0 O O 3 0 O 0 0 n 94co N H -.1 N ci) oN � -I Cl) Cl.o g g N C!) O 0 o 0 --,Cm GJ W N N 0 N 01��1� CO Co co << N 3 in o n C0))CD N" a)01 g • 3.3 K w CD 2. O K U, m cD m c) -0 CD -1COOl 5 f Q D ) E C2 �N X-' c C2. Z E - GJ N 0 ° 01 H bp �--, m C) 3 �C) CCnD CD 0) D o 01 cn ( -03 z (7 m < cn cD c� < oD CD m 5'cD a) Q) o �--� Di v CC) st co in 6, m cn � Q vcD Q 0)D o C— CD i)) N 0 �0 cnO O = Cv = O CD 0 0 CD CD= (0 -0 0 0-0 D H < --I ,� CD <•Q OCD CD O g c.0 00 0 0 p o a) a —, cn 10 o O — O 5 0 O� C7- ,-� C� — CD -, cn � �O cn =.O � co 0) 2 0 �< CD Cl) 0 d O 00 =%< 0 0O 0 CDc CDo O Ca) co << — n co a .--�CS CD O •• C 3 U) 5 0 =• O Cn cn 0 -a6• oC o 0 o CCD 'Cro CD CD_ CD t:1)t:1) a-cn Q a m E .< O - 3 a'cn 5o_ 3 CD —1 -oo m0 r 0 r O �' O CSD O CD (0 n'cD * x (0 v ,=.: o m CT o CD ? cn co cD cn 5 CSD cu m n cD CD . cn CDCD 5. 0 o a. v -g D cD a. < a. a 5' m o ✓ -9 Cl) -0 v cn CD O K (0 0' 0 32 co 0 c 0 CO CD o. Eli x o CD N CD r -� 0 0 -I o Cl) -< -, (i) 0) Cl) 0" s > o .1 0 0 O C —I H c —I c m 0 ca) ✓ - m g a o u) Dcn = I Z 4 �m I C7 � � � 01 ca 0 c 01 C n O — sy = I 0 = Cr 01 cn iv N 0 Z Cn Z �1 �a 0 0 0 0 0 c 0 O C �, Cl) C/) Cl) Cl) Cl) � • 0 0 C, CT _ co O Co •�! -P N -' Cr O -I > 4) a) o -% -p cD r' an C a.No Z ] Cn C/)N CD O -a CO pp O -,1-,1 Z cco O N N N -�- p' _ 0 C) O)(.J1 • • -• > CDD y C1 O CD 0) -• V N)O-� 2 m a) 13 il 0 CD rn u, w iv (I Er o - - CD _. - ...� N > j.) = -■ 0 N Z C7. Z _a Q f) , Cl) �'`,, 'a Z- CD 'co es -D-1 3 0. CD CD O �' et D - - D a a 030 73 6 c0 �0Cb. o CDoxi -o =D oD a) 7-3 ^p ni `<CD -a') .00 CD CDC in CD C -0 cOECD 0 =- D WCD O Ni ='. = .-+ a) '� CD CD O'O C� 0 0<• • _. CDO � = a) = O ? X- '.+O RI C �-00 = a) 0 --+,CD Cl) 0 O t!) CO Cn 0 Ncp3 < N ON cn _,7- 0 CD cOomo a) CD � C) CC) 00) �N - 2 0� 0 � QQ CSD � m � o� 0 < CD ci) ~ 0 O Z , cn•n.=Co ��' 5._ co cDc o � o o')C0 ) � CD 0* 5.0 ,_CI - � _'CD O CD O CCD/) O CO 0 0 D a) v' �O 3 a) Cn -c) =v; CD Cp 0 `� o = � _ �N .c 0 CXDOO"o--- * ✓ < "a cDo c7) c0 0v o3 CO r-+ _ C 'cnLD (�!) CD N Ln a) COD ,_�d Cn . O < co CD CO CO cr QO 8� •(i)-0 m - Z= 0-o n '�C Cn O0 CD �< (0 > CD c a) cn ,n -_n CD v� v 0 0 =�CDcn � m O � r+,-+ � CD CT CD -+, p C 7 5' 0 o 3 Q 0 -, 0 CD V1 �p 50 O DQ 0 0 a) =„o /� C/)' = CO 2 '� N Q 0 c 0'CD 00 00 co -a _+ o0 = 00 T1 .8 6-- -,, o) n, _ -00 D(O oQo) 0 oo-< O d (C/) CS -' 0 CO CD Cl)"C7 5 0 -0 a) 5 CQ'_' CD * (/).,‹ o cp _- CCD �-' = N 3_ O ? CD a) .-+ 3 � CD CD �• • N 0" 0 =..--‘ •o a) t r+ Q CD CD =- a) 0 0- D 0 0 0•a) CD CD 0 CD 0 CD 0 m 0 0- 3 5- CDS nCa 0 a) Cp O-0 = O CD CO = d a) a=. CD 5-co = • O CD � CC CCa) O 3 0 o a) CD "0 _ C O c= "0 — -• CD0 (' CD Qo 0 3 0 N 0 v 3 CD -' O' CD .-+ a) C cp Com) _ 2 O.. • CD E a_ a) X N n• N D N = N = N N n o = o = o = o = 0 O CD _ 5• zK 5' = 5- > >• 5. 5- Z c =CO w O 0) O a) co O co O co O 5 x co F '‹ _ _ _ _ = r a -: Cr) Cl) C/) C!) Ci) W 0 -� < co E O 0 0 0 0 m� OO 0 �- 0oa m — -I -i -I -I _ � m _.o • cD 3 5• CD CD CD (D m CO c0 CD CD rr m 0 (/) C) o co Cn 0. C) 5 Cn n CO CDo o Icp' �' I to C31 01 5 Q 01 =5 cn ' C1 -I CD CD -0 Cr -13 0 =- i 0 0 0 ET a 0 0 Cl) v) cn n.m� - —I(.0 N CSD > Cr.) Ni o N O -� C/)ao ] N Cn -1O m N c n in CP GJ:I, cQ ca , <,D . 0 n o co U1 O 5. O O CD "CO N � C1 _,.-� — X ' C Co cpo 3 6 o —�ci, w W ; 2 iii aN O C1 0 S 5-x O o..5 NO cD10 < O0- _ D'O CD � 'CD < O 0 �� cow -, CD 3v c= -1- -a Q 0 cD = o CDa Ha a) o cowM v 3 -meg_ .ocDa CD c, v (, - 05'cn co U)CD '<co = • CD CD (. . rn O (,DO cn cn CD _ ) (1) cn O o cno .,eL C0 o oa) 5 CD 0 3.P.-CD n v cr0 CD CO 0 n o N o = 3 v-o C) CI CD n C_D u) O CD D 3 C v 0-a cD o Oo R-sv cD CO Q ) O 0 C1 Fp'(D * 70O O r+ CD = C) O - O C ? D OQa)-CD 0 x COD 'c O-o c" cn v 3 a) << 0 CD cn CD D CD cn O a N CD 3 fl3 -O = CD -oCSD cnC0- • cC = CSD 0O O 2 CD o CD —, CD Q 0)- N = N = N = CD o = o = O = 5-CO 5-co 5 co co 0 CO Q) Co O = = Q a_ o_ cn cn cn = = =- O 0 0 —1 —I H cD cD CD g 2 2 C) 0 0 0 C N 0_ a. so cp f._ a_00. I = = �- 01 0 m WZ —b.C cp --1 * C N . a 3 E 0 73 3 `o ^' CD r -A cr * co ao N � m N W 0 3 O 70 N i � �0 • N co co iti v `< - m O N o 2 P-- - --A. 0 3.c� c C `1 3 K rt) CD N) ll C7 ° � o a. - 0 Rl o ;t7CD c K) cn C) CD N CD CD �_ w- 3 0 a '� Cn N Z a . ( N CD v n Cy . ( z 0 cD N O -I r- N CD O 3 n &I n co --I (• CD N 3 8 .P o _a cp O < `C cD a) -•z (n a) O o co C1 5 ET a, v cD 3 y Q 0 'n 0 r a o 5� ca cD o cD o x cnv -0 Fr3 73 cD E 5. x CT op -' z Fri co o0 CD cn CP o• m m c 0 z �� C7 3 0 o FD- c -- -I 5 m 1 Sakellar Associates C N Dino Sakeilar,AlA Manuel B Rojo.RA February 6, 2005 Gail A Wright,RA Carlos De Alva.AIT Oro Valley Town Council Nicholas Sakeilar. FAIA 11000 North La Canada Drive 1918-1993 9.819 3 Oro Valley,AZ 85757 RE: Request for Land Use Designation of NCO/LD1 Town of Oro Valley General flan Update 2020 Church of the p p Apostles property located at the NW corner of Tangerine and La Cholla Tax farce) No. 219-42-0160 Dear Mayor and Council Members: 100 East Sixth Street On behalf of myclient,The Episcopal Diocese of Arizona, I hereby request that the corner p Tucson,Arizona 85705 section of the above property be designated Neighborhood Commercial/Office (see attached map). This request comes as a result of the Diocese understanding that the intersection of voice 520.622.4166 Tangerine and La Cholla is being designated as a major intersection with commercial and mixed use. fax 520.629.9952 Thank you for your consideration. 10ely, C.N. Dino 5akellar, AlA President cc Rev. Jamie Conrad Clark Greger Attachments: Requested Land Use drawing sakeliar.cor: Architects and Plan : G:\2001\0102 Church of the Apostles\Construction\14-TR\0V-Letter.DOC 1 1211 1 � 1 � 1 � 1 1 1 II . 1 RLDR RLDR RLDR l'l' Hil�r�.� 11 Q G e S e,1,, u rc e LIMEWOOD DRIVE + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + t + + + + + + + + + + + + + t + + + + + + + + + t + + + t + t + + + t + + t + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + LDR2 RLIDR + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ... . ... ... + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + i. ... + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + t + + + + + + t + + t + + + + + t + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +▪t t + t + + + t + t ; + t + + + + + t + + + + + + + + + + + + + t t + + + + + + + ,. __ _ , . _ +1p + + + + + +▪ t + + + t + + + + + + + + + t + + t + t + + .. t + t + t ,♦.♦♦♦♦ ,♦.♦♦♦♦.♦♦♦♦♦♦ + +4. + + + t 4.+4.+4.+ + + .44. 4. 4. 4-44. - 4-44. 4-44-4 4. 4. 4. 4. 4. 4. 4. 4. 4. 4.4. .♦♦♦.♦.♦ ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦. +▪+4.+4.+4.+ +4.+ +4.+4.+ + +4.+4.t +4.+ + + + + +4.+ + +4.+4.+ + + + +4.+4.+,♦ ♦.♦♦♦ ,.♦♦♦♦.♦.♦♦♦♦♦. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦I I♦.♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ .♦♦♦♦.♦.♦.. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + , : + + + + + + + + + + + , : .... .... .------ Afflo ./ + t + + t + tt + t + TANGERINE ROAD - - - . . - .44 :P. . - . . . . . AIL. . __ r __ ___ i _ , . . ,.,,,44.-, 40)°°g°°P'r ,,. i .. , . / z / .. I / /. NCO- NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAU OFFICE MUN- MIXED USE NEIGHBORHOOD LDR2 - LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL +++t+t++ PSP- PUBLIC/SEMI PUBLIC + + + + + + + + RLDR- RURAL LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL REQUEST LAND USE 2/6/03 iiii ,,,,,,... Sakeltar Associ. .: : ^ { ( I of I • F:\2001\0102\CotAv2.d wg,02106103-03:08:45 PM S'akeliar Associate , C N Dim Sakellar,AlA /1114P 4rF Marcel B Rojo,RA February 6, 2005 Gail A Wright.RA Carlos De Alva,r=lT Oro Valley Town Council Nicholas Sakeilar,FAIA 11000 North La Canada Drive 1918-1993 Oro Valley, AZ 85757 RE: General plan Update Townsdin property located at Naranja [give and La Cholla blvd. Tax Parcel Nos. 224-11-061C and 224-11-061D (+/- 13 acres) Dear Mayor and Council Members: We hereby wish to amend our request for NCO/FOS/MDR to MDR only on the above 100 East Sixth Street referenced parcel. Thank you for your consideration. Tucson.Arizona 35705 fro- e ly, SO 0 voice 520.622.4166 $ax 320.329.9952 C.N. Dino Sakellar, AIA president Cc Chuck Townsdin Attachment: 11x17 Requested Land Use 2/6/03 sakellar.corn Architects and G:\2002\0211 Townsdin\OV-Letter2v2.DOC . , V -- .11. _, - ' 4 '' •4" t *1 ., - —- • L. ' , '...1,* ,., ...„. . C. ,.,„1,. . ,., A-, (I) -0 1-: 73.--1 L'• g' 1/4P ......„ . . ..!,I1'.t_ ". ' ..t'"r,, -1N 44,.•--:-„ei' .,- ' ' * . '1" “NOF•#lir'al;. '.4".....• • ''''' - - , ,4r,o1• is.-tly_tb---- -.•, 1 M •,-Z 4? E -. co - -.$`1'' , -. • ... , is ,,, : ii ." lid iii st! *.jit:L. 9 - = — " •-'.!' 1,s-s - 4 -43 i 6-73....,...- .: olipt....- iivl. ....„64. ..r Rip,„ilit- ---40.--,.. ' - n - g -s 5 ig 1 't g ...-. jilteiti ^) 0 -.1kt. 4*-, .._,..,-. — i. 1:3 4.14h. -1. ,- --, - . .eril- . -...,-,... . „.. , ,. ....0 ,,,,,$•', r_. g 5; CD ;,-., . ' '... !!* . ' '4 1• > — -6-I 1 -8 ig a .< 01'44; '.,:;,;:' 111 :;,.., • -101%.„ --7,,,,:,N-'.-4,,,,i-ci. --V.,0 , -44,1' ig ii. 63 ; , „.....„, .„,..,, K.,..8,1.,"' •1 '''-‘,-.....ni• -friV,,,,_1,4%.,:,,-..t,. ... .4- •-,.... .74.1. *,' ,.., ...,L2'..1" .r,.,ii' . -' •,,,,,,„` q..1,,,,,,,, -2 ---;,,,, 0 5 ? 511 ill 6 '.*:-.4. ip,, 1 L.. ,,„,,,,, ....... -.LC' : :ff...,•,„4 ,.„,. 4.-•••=. , ,....--_,, — -,i:- A•...4,4;,,,,,,,,,,7'-;;;,........:4. :., r— g S g --, ' . ' ,...,, , ..,,,ii ,,,,,,r.r..--&,..,., , .".%., V,t, • •• * -.z . tv ' . 'tii ' '7 ,- ' I .tr-L - • -1 - , ' _ -'•-• ',.`,',1*: '‘.. , ..... .7. i Z I -----,- " - 11111110M111k. , ' 111611611.1111121M12111116. ,„ , .., , , 4,,, ., 7J Fli 0 c • \ - - ',\\\ > I Ili (/) --, 0 r • \ \ \\\ \ \\ CD = a) -0 = M . C -0 ' - . , . • 0 - --'\ • \ \ s' \-\\•\\\ '\:\ •••,-,C:1\.\\\ - -,:• \ 2\:\ \\\\:\ \'\\''.:,\7.\\-. c • : \ \„1/4\2,-- -‘,„ , - 1.nn' 0 g C2n) a-,) 7-4-(-) cp w cp \\ \ \ \\ = = cn rit\j ._kass. . o 0 0 C f g! 70 = 1, =- \ \ C.) .,'• a xi c = \\\,s \ 111 6 •Fi r..1t. \\41:31, N , --- 0 •• ...= \ -‘,..,,,, 7 — — - - u•J V -...... - - _...,..... _ \\\\\ ,..-: = , 1 i 6 1-- „, ,,, ,., ,. _,•.\-C,,,,,,,,,,,,, \\\\\ 0 i 7 7 ; 1, i , ..,,, 33 i'2-) i r" 0 ,-,• \11011s\S\•,,',,,„ ' \ 0 3 DO m Wc.c-I C ..• , -7,i 2 -• :• 4..;.: ,-•*: 2r , m- cp : ,-/' ' ,t'•'.'6L,1 * 11110111016.—'IIHEIMMIIIII*1116, ..,_ ' ,,,,,,,:-41.-,_ -.A-i-.•;, A r 1 li whh..1 i i a iin i II b,. 1 I I I El I I I le I I I 6. i '' — 8 - '\:\\, K al -I? ...\\ \ '• 5-9:+), , .... a, \ .,„ \ \ .,., .•.. _ ..,... ... „.. _ ...._ •,\,,,;.:::::\. \ , , -c6- m 0.3 \\ •.\\, \\ ----• - ,,, , .--„, - , cp , ,1 --- . — -IN 8 _,. o • ----..... ....._ , U .1.\, = - ..._ . .... . \hcl,C31,,•\\\' 8 _• 7'1 f iv o = o to> re. ....... 0 m •\\-\\\'' 0 o _ ' \\.' . ., \\,\ • 3 3 3 (25 a _. 3 g, (T- . .. ..• c,I. 0 ci, . g . . - _ 2 o 1W lik11116. 11111.111111111111k.c>.,_ ' alliihniimialik.., 111116.14bi. RI aimnuno.........--. NEW HIGH SCHOOL 2000 STUDENT CAPACITY CONSTRUCTION AND STAFFING COSTS Capital Costs: Land X2,400,000 Construction $32,790,883 Furniture & Equipment $5,201,000 Buses $1.000,000 Total Capital X41,391,883 Staffing Costs: School Staff $ 1,307,363 Extracurricular Program Staff $ 196,323 Support Services $ 321,798 Total Staffing $ 1,825,484 m t> I EL 5 �. 3 13 6 al. cR -t. = 74 col CCA _ to n oCD to CD 0 O CD n 0 -. — c m '.•4FIT.a 7 o 3 -a o cn cD co o o 7') D O 3 'p cn i Cl) > o > o > -•'T1 7 11 7 o D n CD 23 CD CD� CD co —1-. m o cn D. 0 o. 0 q c -, > &I co , co ri — 03 aul o D Z E. - E. - -, 6 a - C/) M 0 * I 0 c CD j s'. N N CO 0 n N N O O co 0 D) CI 0 oo 0 0 0 0 ; O O O o o • = r' � � 1 O I > r CA-o JO 2 n a) C r-, -, tu 0 co c 0--,O •co co,� o c) V C —1 Z o :4 o o _ .�CD rpt C!1 73 c o 0 00 CO ,.� N N C) t0 oo D I Q, o 4A4N ° Ci) O v w o� "CO 0 C CO .0v Z O o 0 N O CD Ca 0 C 0 Ci) —1 o 0 W 5 Cn 0 -. co c.D -NI CD f*. C c - o iri WO 73 71 co "VA 44CO 44O '1 D -Eft N C) O CO co • v ..•1 0 .. N .4. N �I 0 a) 0-to -0 o c w - Z co CDCD- c71 CII COOpp N " 0 444 O co CCC)A c O o 0 O O O O O Ce Cr.) W N CD CO c CDCO) 0 n - VD i • 1111%.„ "s Rx.c 1011 Town of Oro Valley General Man Update: 2 .. Town Council Special Session February 24, 2003 Tc.....I1,i .;ih.t 5: Focus • Land Use Map (Tangerine and La Cholla properties) — Abrams Properties (#11 and#12) — Schall Property (#18) — Properties North of Tangerine (#25) — NW corner of Tangerine and La Cholla — NW corner of Naranja and La Cholla (map#8) • Elements — Community Design Element — Housing Element — Costs of Development — Open Space and Natural Resource Conservation — Economic Development 1 Abrams Properties (#11 and #12) Current Landowner Steering P&Z Zoning Request Committee Commission Housing 5 80 5 35 Units Fiscal minimal minimal minimal minimal Impact The 1996 GP designates the area as RLDR http://www.townoforovalley.com/ Schall Property (#18) Current Landowner Steering P&Z Zoning Request Committee Commission Housing 10 75 10 60 Units Fiscal minimal $3 m minimal $3 m Impact The 1996 GP designates the area as LDR1 http://www.townoforovalley.corni 2 Properties North of Tangerine #25 Current Landowner Steering P&Z Zoning Request Committee Commission Housing 15 NA 15 110 Units Fiscal minimal minimal minimal minimal Impact The 1996 GP designates the area as RLDR http://www.townoforovalley.comi NW corner of Tangerine and La Cholla Current Landowner Steering P&Z Zoning Request Committee Commission R1-144 10 acres of NA NA (used for NCO church) Fiscal minimal $2.7 m NA NA Impact The 1996 GP designates the area as RLDR http://www.townoforovalley,comf 44.2 3 NW corner of Naranja and La Cholla (#8) Current Zoning Landowner Steering P&Z Request Committee Commission Housing 5 60 16 16 Units Fiscal minimal minimal minimal minimal Impact The 1996 GP designates the area as MDR, 60 units http:/!wWW.townoforoval ley.com! Community Design Element. • Optional element No State statute (except solar) • Carried over from 1996 Plan • Key Policy issues — Overall Design Standards — Site Planning — Landscaping Standards — Architectural Design Standards — Signage • Goals — Aesthetically pleasing, naturally compatible built environment — Ensure access to and control of incident solar energy • Negligible Implementation Cost • Policy covered by ordinance and policy in issue statements to be addressed per Council '44y fE 4 Housing Element • Optional element for the Town, but included in 1996 Plan — significant carryover • State statutes exist but apply to communities over 50,000 people — Existing and forecasted housing needs — Housing quality, variety, and affordability — Equal provision of housing • Discussed significantly at January 21st session — Jobs-housing balance — Affordable housing — Providing a range of housing opportunities — Locations for elderly and special needs te Q. ti Housing • Proposed element has short term costs of$5,000 for data, development • Following Council process approved February 3rd, may recommend changes — Make modifications as discussed — Consider keeping only certain aspects and combining with another element such as Land Use • Retain housing and employment baseline data development • Implications for three legs of sustainability stool — Environmental — Economic — Social Cost of Implementation Consultant Costs Staff Costs $5,000 ,, t Total $5,000 4 max.,�' f4: 5 poet cf ent. • Required by Growing Smarter/Plus — To ensure that new development pays for the public infrastructure and services that are required to serve that development • Three Subject Areas (Goals and Policies) — Fair Share Allocation of Costs — Funding Mechanisms — Service and Financial Analysis • Strategic Implementation Plan — Annexation Study — Annual Infrastructure Finance Report Cost of Implementation Consultant Costs $24.02feet6 O Staff Costs $�. A � Total $30,000 : : :en Space and Na.tu.riI Resources Conservation Element: . .............. • Open Space Element is required by Growing Smarter/Plus — Focus is inventory, needs, policies/strategies for management and acquisition, promoting regional, integrated open space system • Conservation Element is optional — Focus geared to management of the natural resources — Town used primarily to address wildlife habitat issues • Element used in the Town as the primary home for Visibility and Viewshed issues • Element merges two elements in 1996 Plan — Open space from Parks and Recreation Element — Other content from Natural Resources Conservation .rye 'yH 6 Open Spacee and Natural Resources Conservation: Element • Element has the most key policy issues, and most policies of all the plan elements — Topic is fundamental theme of the plan, reflecting vision and first overarching value • Key Policy Issues — Open Space (4) — Habitat issues (4) — Visibility or viewshed issues (7) • Goals — Protect environmentally sensitive open space areas — Protect native biological habitat/species — create/restore habitat — Protect/enhance visual character and protect visually important areas c.I ...en S and Natural Resource Conservation Element • ESL committee contributed much of the element • Call for an advisory committee (Policy 11.5.1 et seq) to provide recommendations to the Council to protect ES lands • Short term implementation policies — review existing PADs — wildlife movement guidelines — certain viewsheds Cost of Implementation Consultant Costs $5,000 Staff Costs $25,000 Total $30,000 r -64:i1;ijj-fgAt"4 44 °ft441/ C°)6)C) oco61.a) )/' 7 E.CO;flC...:fliiC 1'..P;E...VelQDevelopment Euk:u: . . ent • Optional Element for the Town — Included in 1996 Plan — Significant carryover • Support Efforts of Economic Development Department • One Subject Area (Goal and Policies) — Economic Sustainability • Strategic Implementation Plan — Update Economic Development Strategy — Annexation Policies and Procedures — Fiscal Model — Grant Writer Cost of Implementation Consultant Costs $15,000 Staff Costs $20,000 Annual Costs $60,000 Total $95,000 A�. R5 2001 General Plan Update END • 3\ 8