Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Packets - Council Packets (1209)
AGENDA ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL SPECIAL SESSION FEBRUARY 3, 2003 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11,000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE SPECIAL SESSION AT OR AFTER 4:30 PM CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL 1. 6 MONTH REVIEW OF ORO VALLEY'S FINANCIAL STATUS (2002/03 BUDGET) 2. REVIEW OF PREVIOUS MEETING - JANUARY 21, 2003 3. SCHEDULE FOR GENERAL PLAN 4. PARKS AND RECREATION 5. COMMUNITY DESIGN 6. HOUSING 7. LAND USE MAPS (STATE LAND AND KELLY RANCH - 17, 22, 23) ADJOURNMENT POSTED: 01/29/03 4:30 p.m. Ih TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCILCOMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: February 3, 2003 TO: Honorable Mayor and Council FROM: David L. Andrews, Finance Director SUBJECT: Town of Oro Valley FY 2002/03 Mid-Year Financial Status Review SUMMARY: of this communication is to provide the Oro Valley Town Council with a mid-year update The purpose of the Town's financial status. Included as an attachment to this agenda item is a summary of the Town's revenue status and a report finance r ort which includes actual revenues and expenditures through November 30, 2002. would like topresent its report and answer any questions regarding the information that is Staff o p included in your packets. GENERAL FUND: is the primaryoperating fund of the Town. It is used to pay for Town services and The General Fund p g improvements not required to be accounted for in a separate fund. Examples include police, parks and recreation, development services, library services, and administration. Fiscal year to date revenue collections indicate that revenues will be below budget by $708,632 end. The primary revenue sources contributing to this deficiency are (4.3%) at fiscal year construction sales tax collections and interest income. Based on the low level of residential building permits that have been issued through December 31 (203 SFR permits), 410 is a better estimate of how many will be taken year out byfiscal end as opposed to the 500 that were budgeted for this fiscal pp g year. This lower figure of 410 has also resulted in lower expectations for roadway and water impact fee collections. isalso important to note that the Town was notified on December 3, 2002 that the State Treasurer Itp . I Government Investment Pool's (LGIP) investment in the National Century Financial Enterprises Loca (NCFE) corporation is in default and NCFE corporation is currently in the auspices of a bankruptcy court. Even though the State Treasurer has taken measures to protect investors' interests, it is unlikely that the Town's LGIP investment will be recaptured. consulting with our auditor, Cronstrom & Trbovich, we feel that it is unfortunate but prudent to After consu g write-off the following investment losses: General Fund $277,000 Highway Fund 60,000 Roadway Impact Fee Fund 227,000 Oro Valley Water Utility 218,000 Other Funds 138,000 Total $920,000 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION PAGE 2 of 4 The $277,000 write-off to the General Fund is offset by $210,000 in interest income from other investments in the LGIP. We will continue to work closely with the State Treasurer to possibly mitigate and recapture the losses that resulted from LGIP investments in the NCFE corporation. A g p copy of the correspondence received from the State Treasurer is included with this communication. Local Sales Tax Collections • Retail sales tax revenues are 5.1% higher than for the same period last year, which has resulted in a projected estimate of $100,000 over the budget amount. • Tourism revenues have also increased over the past few months. Therefore, lodging and restaurant sales are estimated to exceed the budget by 3% or approximately $40,000. • Construction sales tax collections are significantly lower (30%) than for the same period last year. Revenues are projected to be below budget by $390,000 based on this trend. State Shared Revenues State shared revenues are projected to be below the budget by $35,270. State income and sales tax collections should meet the budget however, vehicle license tax receipts are trending at 1.5% below last year's collections. It is important to note that state shared income tax collections for the next fiscal year 2003/04 will be $518,348 less than the current fiscal year. The same reduction is expected in FY 2004/05. Please refer to the attached correspondence from the League of Arizona Cities and Towns. Residential Building Permits Despite a significant reduction in the number of estimated single family residential building permits projected to be issued this fiscal year (500 budgeted versus 410 estimated), permit fees are forecasted to be below budget by only $5,000 as a result of higher average fees per permit. Commercial Building Permits Currently year to date collections are annualizing at approximately $200,000 below budget. The Triad Hospital is expected to submit a development and building plan in March 2003 and take out a building permit in May or June 2003. This addition should substantially boost the permit revenue to approximately 95% or more of the annual budget figure of $364,000. HIGHWAY FUND: Total revenues are estimated to be below budget by $177,000 primarily as a result of lower than expected trends in state shared fuels tax receipts ($117,000) and the NCFE corporation investment write-off. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION PAGE 3 of 4 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION FUND: Revenues for this fund are expected to be below the budget by $3,000. TOWNWIDE ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FUND: Total revenues are forecasted to be below budget by $3,358,000 at fiscal year end. Dependent on the 410 single family residential building permits that are projected, development impact fees collections will not meet budget by $180,270. Estimated interest income includes the $227,000 NCFE corporation investment loss. Grant revenues are estimated to be below budget by approximately $3.IM due to right-of-way and utility issues that could not be resolved in a timely manner. That delayed the bidding of the Naranja Road and Tangerine Road widening projects. WATER CONNECTION FEES DEBT SERVICE FUND: As a result of less residential connections, this fund is forecasted to have a $142,000 negative year end revenue estimate. Non-residential connections such as commercial and irrigation are helping to offset the gap in budgeted residential connections. ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY: Year end revenue estimates indicate a total negative variance of approximately $184,000. The negative variance in interest income of$328,000 is somewhat offset by water sales ($141,739). ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OUTLOOK The following information has been provided by the Economic Development Administrator. I. Incorporated into the FY 200/03 Budget Revenue Projections were Commercial Construction Activities for five major projects: 1. Ritz-Carlton Resort was NOT anticipated to start during the FY. 2. Steam Pump Village Retail Center was anticipated to begin construction in November 2002 but has NOT as of this date. This project most likely will NOT have any construction of buildings during this FY. 3. NW Oro Valley Hospital was scheduled to begin construction in May 2003 but most likely will NOT start construction activity until sometime in FY 2003/04. 4. Albertson's Grocery Store & Retail Building was anticipated to be complete by the end of March 2003 and that schedule appears to be accurate. 5. NW Medical Office Building (part of the hospital project)was projected to begin construction in April 2003 but will NOT start until sometime during the 2003/04 FY. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION PAGE 4 of 4 II. Some other items of interest, and even some positive actions, are: a. The recent sale of the El Conquistador Resort to the new owners, CNL Hospitality & Hilton Hotels, and clear indications that additional investment in upgrades and improvements will be forthcomingsoon is a positive for the Town. This revitalization follows closely to the multi-million dollar makeover for the two 18 hole golf courses located at the Country Club and the multi-million dollar addition of 25,000 square feet of meeting/convention space at the resort. The timing of these improvement and planned re-investment are closely tied to the rebound of business travel. of two new b. The recent announcementshigh-tech businesses (Integrated Biomolecule Technology) establishingfacilities in Oro Valley continues to help in Corporation & Gum T gy) clearly identifying that this communityis a community of choice for this important class high-tech businesses provide high paying positions and satisfy a of businesses. These g major Economic Development Strategy evelo ment for the Town by providing good jobs for Oro Valley residents. pursueexpansion The Town continues to and diversification of our retail sector. After an processes the Oro Valley review Town Center (East side of Oracle Road at the intersection with First Avenue) was approved. This newest retail center is focused pp on unique retail establishments, office tenants, sit-down restaurants and a 200+ room This center, asplanned bythe developer, at build out could generate high end hotel. upwards of $ 2,000,000 annually in new retail sales taxes for the Town. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Summary Financial Status 2. Finance Report, November 30, 2002 3. Arizona State Treasurer Letters Dated November 22, 2002 and December 3, 2002 4. Urban Revenue Sharing Letter from League of Arizona Cities and Towns dated October 15, 2002 SUGGESTED MOTION: N/A 222-- a4,41A-1— David L. Andrews Finance Director ;66/4/C-- C uck Sweet Town Manager l'..110 oil ,,,5",s,"(1)All 2 41,1 11111 1.-- 111111 ai m""i"1 0. 1111111 1 1111 c Ili a 1,. if.4t,'"0 1111111 Ill III t.' III CN 114 p 11100 1111 1111 „...,„...1.,,,,-itiolli c\i j:k.,...0 -Ill rtikti Ill 6--!1 C';Mika 1.0.:;:-.7::,':';.::"4 CN 411 0441 c,ill*co total"4'411 !Itli 1111 8 iii,E:ti gill co iiii CIIIMI 1141 *II osit!cs 1111111 c...1,41•1-All III 41 :II itiIII nilito N.' '.11111 Nil(NI ri,..1.1 ill 111.1 :.4Aiii. tili 9,*14i Nil% In ifitt`'. 1!:411ii 11111 Ill talk talk 6 mkt*Lo „ litio litift kit tool .,-;.,,:tal itrit pall co 4411 111 VI% 11111 414 ill IIIII co 4401 ii!"..,!Ns ovirgtt. riikil Ill 441 III lit te '1,01.41i 1,31 1.04"'.i::,1 -"AI !Al Ill 11111 Nill uc?) c`e-) 511:vail. 041 :lei..1 lilt 11111 III Ili illilk- Itt,,,, I WI lin 1141 11% NMI tt:iiii 111111 N- 2 ott,„7 cp lilt N. oakk "hi litoil ttii 1111 Ill N—l'!"'"„„'„""iii0E 8 ittil co .r.." Rt, ii,..41 ibil ,iiiii r . :,:'-': N: CO cl ; gi, IiiiI Iii. .;c §Ili l'7111. 2 11 fig- rik.-11 ,,,,i‘i c.ottel .",...,"4:1% CD ''' kit T". .....wi.,,,,..,-,3, kik N.....,.... Agti.$ l'Ailogi 1/4-1 ..:,,:iA LQ"%iikiii '' _::::,, in .....„,,, ,,.,,,„„,c-...) v.,..44* kglg'V,,,,,C.0 W...4.,.:!,:.„i;:,:, ,:f...,.`..: (3),o,m,,,,,,,,--i;,,,,,,,-. o.','...,:,,,i tit:tati c tot cp-gio tomit te tit!c"Rif o riliat,4%CA 1111:',:' hilki Nil CD ,1„:4.11 CD.,kill!`,71#-ifral kilit ..:, '. tititl Oil 0 fp41.8 lit"c Ill c.-6 tot lik 1st tit% it ploi cc' ,--tam ccS mist is oil" 11111 :ilizi pi" to clipAtill r, .itz, -10/41 iltiti Ilk willi '1111 r4itti al ithill'III 1111 Pl!ki 1111 .,*,1141 111 a) Cl) CD!tier toti gig 11111 ivail . 13 a) 11,N !vat itt lit t(N lt,11 N. C lil I.°Ilta!! Ill 1%1 ill c\j 4*_N--- Nil 0 al E %tit to% tilt% 461 littoi 1111111,,L.4--1411 *-1111,11 CD frtitit 4,,kit itiali 114.% in '',Iiii; iv*,-it% Lo " — 00.41 %II tailita r..4%! t4 hikk 0)-vat.1-ttok - C 11) fill Itti toil kb"0)1,7A1 c9 i.,:.il r .%kr co mei 0 cp w !ilk!" kat ilitt, :ski Lr)til -',:„"„,",:o Lo ilit', kr ›- oittfi,,r -Ekon":cp.of rc).lull" Gilt 11111 mill il co iitrii (-6 .0,-tali I% tot; it eto,-.1:1111 -;1...4I°)*it III LAN Ill Eli Ir):zit" 4ft,c0 Itilji ortit '""."NO eiwl* "441 4111 CO Nit 41)1,11'1-1 kik 1111 illtili till :";"""nli u) iu:;,::::::,.,,,,,,,,,, - ,(C)%If ..,,:t.ft*,:.:4:0 W CO iii4iiii.i.i;:i C°4Villi ''*,.116 1111 Mr% 4.1",r-4 11111 C\J 0,01 N"--:!.:5,4111111 1.0 Viimyi 1/411 itill 1.141 4441 sta,--: cti likka!PF.,„::!..:',11'4..:.. IVO" L...PVIti Ohl ilk 4411 igillii!i Cel CO- 44tRil •Liv,lipli Kat Nil 111.11 lc% afti gill 0 E N .C12 in a)owfit. tang ;:siteti-1""Nu 0) W - :ill il.k.,!„-, vett co 1111 - .715— 00 fowl kit mil,—karr CO tilicT. mit ...„,,,kii h"''"'''. tot A >+ LLI CNI., 1St at% iltill CI!'''''''',w,:,'.: N-...%-:-.....",,N,CO Iill% ,et, tr,:lik:s1 Ismo4 ofiti cp oi.,i!,;ii„i„„:,,,,,,,,... ,.. ,,,:iiiiii 0)iiiiitt VIKNN,' "likj:,.; CO Ilk p','.."c,,,,m N--- qiitt i .Illik, (C) 0 52 co iiio-.:, paRt4 i§tt,ilt N.Nit -',:.-2:„1 c-.)riaxit miiii it- (t1 11.04ooto c.11.4 0)Ittl 1.0'!',4116 in*0,1 1111 TO' CI elli. CD iliiii, glipti ,itki CD V-.:114,11 rill r . ', ifqi Stil > a W 0 will CD;Milk CD 14,1 1.0 11111 cN ''',:nii.Nriill 114,i; itill >I. Mikit 0 4.1441 11,Ail Lr)Ill '''',, 1141 '1,111 0 0CNI I .0 NM"0 Rilit 0.411 v`t„ 14(v)111 111.1111 loll 4111 ,:t,;,.,.,,..44 h..pit Er,Tommi%L.),*:‘1!1! tozit!!!':!' ',..„ 111011 Atli 6 a — E cp kik(NI tittil ,— tititi co:,..$,-;Ati kik litil 144k kilo N Il W c1CD 1111 co 111 01'u'it.,11,41 ktil 1111111 1141 . , 73 8 tol.,„"Q lit ,_.iiiit4, hiriii Nu" it" *II Rol 0 E: c CO(.1 otti iiill„D N-...w,oit,.:, cilits ti..1:,:to ilk kokt ik,,,,,:i c Z Z oiii 1 i'"i.(0 1 1 eliti Ittlik toitt ;rfitAil c`t ilk lit Nil kill 11 I I 1 I Irlio cii:4!1 111 LI' © ce) .4., ii„,,„„,.,,...,.: .., ,......,c,, ..-- --.771.4, '' -• a 0 co litit igate tbso lotto filo 1,44 0 10,51! r%ei o tot Aim" ,t; 44,51 tivi,„ N rm ihtt: 44,,,, ,t44,,,,.. #7.4444, ,..-lik% 1.... a -13 vat .**1 ot,i11„ kw§ :.101% ivat 4414 01 cp 0 m tilli lotoi tirit blit 41 'to% Ili sit c N al OS 11-ti otto .F5F.* t; 4:10" Nit w efotil %Al 041....! itoil ill >" !It% litl kit" istie: timm "ii,iiio --cn 0,111,ell 11111 0 ogili 4,Aur, itiotoy, tivabli vie litho .3,0,4% tito,„„: 41,40!Z NINI 106,* U)pkt ilk ,,,„„,0 el-Niti '10141 itgoil:1-ot kik Ili pitai tot cn,1,4," E Aso otatii 2 mitto **I t=Riol L--Witt: tot lit% as N-54 0 Rho , . 4,.,,,,eimi, a.) ikt RNA tootti! L-- e.... pps tivipi E,11.,%, 0_,littii . ')litkit Nil _2 pitopi ,...04141 lit* --t litakt stitto '_J m liatti 11111 AD Ili 7041 ca 111111 a)111111 cn _ !tr:istgti (8 111,11 — 0.1 _,,-:op" lit i_I riiii =rup.",1 7.1,41-0 itt54:u 0 0111:111 =ill a)NIIII 8 ktrill c"Nu .— ::-„,,,:;.1.4•=itit a)lipi::111!1 ,c2 o tztA4-.+c,fiall ,_ zopilt -a c:':-..,*co tvoi co likkg,R 0-'.111.1 Ill %.1 M 111141 > 1011 .-- -.ifiill___1111 4-I III --' ' II 0 U)11:41 _*II 03 16-441 co mio u)No" cf)--,Hig CO 0%.,,sti=litia U) ,a)RINI .:,::,:::,,,,::::,„:, 4411"0 114 Tu re% 2 killia",,, E 0 al killi-0 l!I'J4iiiiii Inti 0011 (Lfj Wit L-Ilk a)LI* = H!cittittli, a)Imo" tr=lOtit E if* 0 tolii c tiskat cu ii„E"1,";:iim R>4.",!-0 (1) t.N. 41 a)Offl E gliai a)Nis a) 0,o1,10,,,„=-„,,,,to z,„,,,,,.:,:.,.# .:$7,640 > —littli cn'.::.:414":2 1<s..:,,:it 0 kit w co IliviRig cn w w ilitit a)!to" 2"It tooti. co CO Attkit'i'i 0 0 Ill illib- __I-:••• , 0OO O Iii'''''1,1,'iiiiii:::1iiiiiiii:ii ' rJwO C 0^w$l!:� Ow:':'5.'::• :. wlili1111111:11:11:1111:.C)(16N- Ow'4v3� -Intl O YkF3f ! -t.111111111 N1L5}5:y: O r to M <>:>>:<:ry i,:. lil tit. ?, 101111 :vQ+2 INS. ::%x5555:<>:: Rn:Y .Y. J„ M.A.;. t •.v •FR:C2:iv,{ K W '{2 kY}i{x •G n:: 4 r>. :.Gi' v Moll wA•Yi::::: X15aif ..R.t.:,:5i: n.`+2'2;: ...y,.,., :3:WYR+Y:Jr �{ >R S ..:G::iS: •Y.:{Li ?Y' r}}Yi +iYP? y •:Fv: •r:;�.t.•{.,r,.y: nx%:•+:;}hair :k"Fk:45S55 •:4: rv:•Yln:S; y2.rt>•: ■as ris:;?+.454::::: 3x:3:' low. 3k?TJ••• ::Y.. �Y+.v os II* •,rUk *loft r. {.:5•:}'.:;r::I:,{:.. .y'.;{.Y..:.i: 4001 r'£ �a as v+. SR'"•! v��:,•('+ ?.,:•:Y5'4?:i$5"J.;S: nf.}:: ............. T+ O 11 .'af:$moi: v t•1/. fi.. i.'Sr. 4� F: }:'r.Y f .. '� ..;ii :557 vr. :G •f.4 las .S. :5:ti •3 in4. .Q-r 5:Y. vh'+v {33i;+ 2'R.�'•fi.,.6 :.r•r �:7`v: v:F}}:S o- :a �:` xesx .F. o-r:.G•:.. �)t is %{J r f2: .?/R•rr .:4.4Y :a tax. rJ.43rr ti: r.R. 5ih't •Y.vx.: :•k L4rt: ? r 5:� r. na•%r^i: •.T. .{::Y.v. :{'A,ii;:}iii aibF:4Y�4c4:• R.5.v:}r 4 x :S!Lxkvr \�4 KRYv •::fv.} k2:J 5$155 Co O 0 pimfmi 07 C 0 O5157 0 0 CO 0 O O O 0 O O O 0 co O w$ w w wi: w' ow w'• w:: rn O %.d,ilia" O O iiii::iiiiiiiiia.„.iiii,i, maim M�\ O tie lin ��J 1181111111! C6 libiliN v'•.L O .R. ii'f.. Will r S'n 111011 c\J 11110 :2:i. M r.•Y.vr}:•.:. CO Milibilil .5::{{2v: 11 O ..r�. C1)., w w c 2 :iiAS:•:;;•:4: °IN"! r�ti�r$v0 W N itill,,,,,1:,,I,L ...4:55': r.T.. T:p}n....4.... mg c oriel 1„„„,„,„„„,„,:„„„, "pill moo ei}r+. •ii/xrr: • {{4 +I. .f •.4n N .t: •if•i III as ..,m. ille, n# rr< dv IBM r,..2r; ::SAF. %S kilt :'f:•Y'+;+`.'+i, v,L'.'+:4L?'!.:}':: ,}Oh:. S•x 2?rC>'�'Y "LORI`�4:^ 3,r';`:y:t;:d;t':t$ .+5r..;r-.;J., $. r�r':Gi,..•:: ,�/K.<i:{F>- W F;�'rF; :.Cti��rtiX<,�; :+•:CrxnR +.. ":' M`rvp fTn•;?h.. : NA*..+ >t`+ K'' }°�-{.: .;rrtYi4;:S^.;<: 1111 l ?:• }+ ;:r:•Y:CSti?{;r�:•Y fir 4.�`::v:. �'i$i}jr:.::f::3 !r:.,R{ 2gt;i.•`•':^t4i •G.t:':>:ill limp 7:`�1 y?3?: .+:r:.ry itati a+r.. r:5r`}•Y, 4:;Fir•..::::+:: 11111,, !il'iliiiiii)40 'S`t�'y�$<;�> A. iiy:;:;:4r:+.rR NI" J r?J:+4 pm YS Yat• ,,, Ron tYr;. Ah f 3:F/.u) ..�.. poi mu �:.Yr`...J.•5r.;..rSi++:: 3 •+rmy{.; .. A. 1111,0 atilt CD .F.w. .Y... r:i J. l sit„,,,,,,... 7 f. akFR:Si :•:arT! +ar Y•: w.R:. FFri%: CO •irri.:rr:::�:. .�::•:.;:'. ii::f%2er:ta::: I Nom cY Rom?r pall ? 4+.}. 0) E ,--mitir,,,,,, ti CNCO M :55:1 i:<i'... Rift�:t:v r MO ,,,,,, N- IR N w Cl) II, co N O ...Omsk w :.!F•?5i:'i:�i i3 FOR" ':�] ::i:t:3553 :T S;,y4.}:•:}.:rY• W?ii+::tv,k.. O113, INN k3i:`:ei;•5f; CO` r ifC/!.r �� N.>+ itillEil N is O i PIM R.y.r. � N O ,...„,„, ,,,,,,,,,....., O 11111(0 t.. 1111.11 .x Nee}:' e:t455:i2 1 1,,,,m„, r; eQ't Nom .rR•:.. ..::...::. .F CU M O To h-igia :::.::t:L4:?.i:.r 3:`k3`: .rl :'t.x:.r:.i:. co •,a O 1 V �Y 01 r '�{n.•?: � � L p4+ %SY..rr.::.v.. 0 e:C+F'4: 7et:5::YY3: Yr.v:.A CI 4) •:rrirri:•:i}.v: .:Jx{4:4Z:•}.} jj<�� .}. • ..%tiffs L. .F: L.. 5:•YJ:i7 o0ww !3�:i2.5� OF:.wn v. r:•:Si•::t xSY:F?.rr.... . t2%f Fi5"4:4555:.: N z....:....::::;;;;;....: rif,.r F.•'v .:....}...'... 1ti ,�,4T:i:. O M:4T'4: W 112 •Y:5SS4S55$55 ':F}iT`v::'r'ii is :rev:v5:`:Y5?::i :1•...Fi... '7rrx r+ ?!:2:5551:?v': YiY%'} ':::: {.. Nan t:::.?•r•:;{::. nt;3:55F33:'•'.f 0 fr� P.,O0jY. Y}'7Y..r:4•:o :.Yn:::Ir'y litir idel O O O 4`::?ai:{•ri%: Liskimil:{....r..:.i::. Nue :. r..:r O O :t:v: O Z .n/. O O O w�: N- C RG,r�k': :::i.i: w.,, w'! w��?�':�43ixn ':'x4::5:+•Fi!': >, { f:t! G :oft^':: .::7�.t..:... N a'• %Milli 0 Ile L° N ��•L Lo INNO a`rr. O tit ;R: r Y... A.r. Nall FR..x. #F..n.a N }iN:• O t4 N I-- 73 ��pr5��•: a � ,} M .�:i:.x: ft t F% 4Y�C:•t 1111 CO 111111 'R !i+. N ri:L!45555r::55i5:: CO1 111111 r; .fit,. CO 24%{�;::3;:;:yji:: -iota. ;•2^:•.4:YR«:::: w 5' .}"+'i'?::x:4:•:55 .i:rt•:"^::'•`.:3. 4.>?:•r: � .::o5»r::5r:5.;: r:4;•r SY?ix ; •i••rri•2x5 v./.t..:ntr, t:F.:• x`•:v: Nam ..w.•... ..!.. •J:irr•: L+•:k+. zi#2�3 sea{.tvY '•�•i%45%:55i:?` '}'``•`:4:••::: :.runv.,::•: i.•i: 2krt•F% �':#'{(. O :tkS;55:5: 4�2::Yk� 5i$:Yi:%::%�::t oak '4%../ :•...F.v 2:k.{;;}ri;?.'4.,;: R:.tom tits }:.YGR; +4 'v?.• :•i 55:::Y+ CO 'i3'tru.?i:rrr: £3,?:t::i :y✓.,w:r .:8 :i trk:•y:33 Matti ` ;: ES: ....1tris:}.:i:::i::: AMR }.:,..,,.:::.:::: <::<::}:{.;>:.:5 :�) '�?iy: MINE ?4,{.,..... 3:s:n• 111111 r:SF+•i�!{27.5: y-Y':t3: 4.n 3£......., 4ir^ i5 LL >Yxi $4+v:t::lx:::55::se .}t4,•r:R•:: elmil kS: F:4%•..•::n•R•:.. :;:�i?i5} 2%:S}{i:•r>:{Si::? 24 tr:j:.?{,.„ :'2:5:2:5:,<2't'!:$i:: t:3i•.. 24:S5r:2: 2. :2L:L:4:n3:4:ti x1.0: a~tk'•3ki ten RvF•Y:•Y i A:Y4Y: ery> r ft'+:t ':::j .5i••4•.., }{•. x.,1•:1.• ii}S:;:k5....{3v Ili f,,r-:: :j:}rh`f+fi; :4:!Y%!$:S: iF\245:hi.4.....r..r.• `•.'F....+2.; :•:245::x;2+;,;5.;•• 'r'%:i?:Y..... ...c:T}y.:• •?:t455 > in 1,5 !It II" ION III .:..F.!'•%S.;v•?riY.� %III n;'rf4k:5::}:;y y..,.�:�.;,i;.t •{:k25•;:%!7.35'2: 111111 ;.r}{/!•G?•., •'•FOSS,is•:, :%^4 ;}:5i:5i2.2'l,.;L7i+S•S�rn +}.,{,•,S;.Y::; Illit: iiiiiii t bR•r.•::i{:{2ri Urn r,!?t y%:tb:::;:: :•>:c;rr.:.;•i:•i: t:;:•a•.}•itr S:;`;,::3:tt:5::t>; or,:•;•2r:!t5i?fi:55• to iii: :f::5ri.�t;:`•:%'$`+' f': S5 :;:%;?%k%:::5:4125:: 2?{:•:.•:?:....!{ i'?Y/v.. ;:5;13{:i:!5$$ mem :•d:o 4:k2Sx•'2':455: Rio T t;;22X1 ri::; i«:Y n;4.y f. r •'.F•.v:::. '•% cn :`vYTSi. }:ttiti:: 4.5'to:>r v. :Siii:%:5555 ] 45:7:5: 4:•:G:... w ism lime :k35:•::.n... :3 r.,;.:. ::]}....?.?f,.,'t%•. 4{9:%2241 4xF$5 mitiaiiliL 0 >77:::?;:;.i `>>eeo xrii3:tt:: 4:•Y• . F1 :. goo :.• ....:: ::......:..yam. 5:i{+ :57 IMP ir`5.... N+: mu 9`� gin`.'2?94155;; :fr;::::.,.::::: • uil W itain,,,, w;: i , •.R h" •a. {�.f. `•:.4 .R r.:: iv,: :Y` :ri$ i:4'J...h tp,¢ �}4 k:. Y��� :l,.•.;4'tf:{:,, gum L u4.,r is {•fi r{+'•'"'•• eYw: :;`.,$,}1{1;.2 2i?t•.:w3'{555 :^%lv::::::. ONO, � / 47F., Mr{ : r} i moo :% :n............. n::i:5::155: ?I. �/ -t„+ {2_�F. ..l;t t4 IMP T•: �eS:7:33%:�:.�: 4 '^ 4 tx+7.+:v' `e V! mp "'s'rr �. ^ R f 111111 5 wt5 " Nib pill Y. 4 :ZD- 11.111 111 111,111 y< 4Iw :5 ^tr4^ :•Ji2,23)OBI 4-E1 1111111 0011 Listsi L tail•O1,:X`4 ^, is +;i:'{?•+;+} u- ()fitio-irio 5'''S� ill s....OliiiiPtigii:11 I-illiii,,,g a)illiRiRlm igiii-.7-7, 1,111111 .� V tile '101111111111:111 (1) i.. III :`r:;t4:i<:: O <<�1t r.+I 4 holiti .r3;027g k cz mon //�) � /:5 ?fir'}'htk5 :.r .: •Y••:S:??:?.:5:55::, O :?^"4:•1X; Will Cl) ?rrR. 44 KS%:555:�4.1 O :9%12:::; t.i,<::; :'••:{::;;>.}.<:5 c$5Y;:5:'S 'S55555:7i5 55:�'. MIN a) �- d- ,t- oo 0 M c° o0 0 oo0 CV Le 00 N i Cr, w E f,„,„,„„„. ,--- (0 co -1- N- ...:,--- , Icr) C r r N In O' N r N >:: CO C O ca N '5 N O - , ._ = >m LL 0 cn a) Ea a) E Eo a) /O _i o V 'L L- .. u) w op a) ca cn a) cL c 2 U ca � � - > � c 0.::.r.:::.,:.:. ,,, ci O 1-- O I— E E cv >+ m ONo O o — >:.-.+ N N >To M O M N 00 0 O ,� M � , cn O N F 1.. cn0attco L 0 — el 12) (NI (.6. (6 a) co 0 = a ,-- (.0 ID N O Q .0 C 0 Co Lou)`*.. N -+>., E E CDN E c) CIL L- > W L te Z , Q . O a� � � a� O Z 7.1> N0000 ) > o ) 0 0 0 ~ 13) eQN --... 00000 0 0 CD CD 0 0 0 0 � O 1 � w w w w .▪a . r0 M O d- 00 L •u) 00 CO lt) d' C6 E O ti CO N- CO E (0 00 N (0 N = _ = N CO (0 00 'r to E w 13, N'-' �= C N- U- U- U U co C) c cn LL te t to O. ea 6e- te 6e- t} = "C a) u) 4... .73:ir, N M O O 'O - AAS) m ' N 70 _+ C C3) -r) F.,3 - E ti O 00 '- OG) E N m a) r- -R. t E 0L u) aL t C4 '117..)-- 6 cc 4.. r2 CD IL CO N O + c a N > _ > Po O oE � � N � (�j � C7 z 'i. � N r O O CO LL CO 5 O 0N CO •t' it) N �) >0 .. 0 0 0 C) C) C) E o .N _ r- O N o0 ti = 0 L _ 0 0 0 C3) O V 0 O 0) C3) 0) c U +-� Cl) (NI N 0) N- r- N N CY) C") 0 0 0 0 CU .W 0 0 0 0 N N N N ) ^' w w a) O w ,-w O > E C Q Co CY) CY) 1 N a W a) a) 2 U _� .. U a9"aa) o = Z 0 w t:4v•i:;;�.':Fi:.}:,}%i:Lriiy•.: i%v3.•. %iE :` : ':t nitAl -' ;1 'wnS •; , .} C cp Wi/: r :%N. Ri ! in 4611-- ettirt 2 1 ,,,, ce- ii, rzi > litz sp, ,,,i „,,,1,1 c) iiii!„,„,„ l.°r .'s 1:4 C\I 1!1:,:t,!!",„,,,I,” mil 0) ..."!!!!!1".1- ,.....„:„„in Doti (,) h.lib.1.sto r-- ,, -0 0 c co (.1 LLI E w% ,{ /rfi' it Ill w i;:}}: � YrN< kitw%titit Nal OhKCO tili q:� iO Ufi:i:co1,.t.•,../;!::1 t,fti%Ax '` `\rsbs. "3 Cl) fi6flv�r11111 y �•4':n. ''o(c3i fS:x4�: :r ,."h{< ;74, . vitt �dri ! pill■ }kvwwr %,i:}} I {�y , 4; C: O/ ?: efXiwV/ � !y:: Ow I;v}:iii: L� i:.4YiO i r { ROI 1aib:: : 4t„,0 „,: <q ,tii$:r vY�to*op it”! E � >iSiay •fiGf• ;Mi mitt } t�is��:3'y: i%?YMti:h.,,410M OAti* i} ^ :J4hOCO r +.cr. 4/w }rik+ � 400M F;#�+ ,,�. xN (oN 111.1 /wNf YteE 7.1. i4i �ry:. � 4WJL} { rYi:3 "v,f>Yh .,!,...:;:„.,:;.ii f;',;Srr$ ' }:E'Y: i} t'2f , O`KFxlE3E' !W! : :: r{ EOfi 3?IifiY ;tiviwttiEr}^ fiO ; :LO Ei 'Ill i} om Ea miliii,:. .,.sx,t„„,,,.„„ k""et)it;!oi:,,,,,,,,,„:. co 17; kil . -.::::co Niviti 603. gig,0 y22 w mitt ',,,,.:,,,,,, 1%4,...",,"i.„,„,,,,i,i:iill ce....-:..... .,:":-:,.."„,;„,„,:,, 0.619.!!...,...::',4,i h.-„:‘,..:,'''"',,, imtli 1,11i: :*,:0 .. e ittgol— ta(13 lk ee. CN 4.11 iiii E NI il 00) tik i. as 0 `.6: > ° 09 0 0 u., w� 1iviiihw>ylS 00O woi4ROI: 0.1114 r-I4 } i .:t;>:{l �"r".:. y {yy4yyj tIll III `r� ::i:i "al `Y1ON r K '/A- it.4,o � y, o •AAcl:1, Y . ; ,i�p• ""v} VA34..': j .,.W Y4 } '''E " \!•..<{WvIYkr;:} 4 ?•O ir^ �'ii:�i?{hV% kill ,445:..N tiyr'94 tiq� : ,14,00,,,, j4Y\y fi� Jo ?h Axt '\ if Tk ,, ,›,, „..„,... iti ghotti 1. iti0 © ,...............„ .4:40k: kilibo ti e 1114 Rh'IN CD ittiOk-0 rib ��0 LI- 41 1F�%x � # 41,ac,;oftlf.it: ia k}:ir�titU� :Yi: Ext}%.' >ikik: '$'i�y: • ,iV: ii: • Ili 1. 110011....!'......,.„.",""!1, n,”kik Nivtil Ilk ? IS? v: filtiCjLiYw� } .'::.,",,,",,,,t: E �:•;}%j:iii:i;ii:&:, f} a: 1 0 Cn „""5110"0 IlliNlk ttfx> If a) ,4.44:,: ,....„.,...:, v> ? 1111:x4'G'4L trn.} ': 2kriitxIll %%ailOfl g ii,:a.,,ill CVO ':%` ,Ui — ::Si. S 73'71•11 C'Ci �. }oiUivJvG; ;\ikt \V.::ii;:i } F: 111 ,iigit iiiik 10 1.:!';,..'.:: a) ......„:"", u_-7.i,.,111,i,i1 F- >,„„„„„::::::,:„,."",,,,,, 0 W` O it S / _tFr? �Q : k • } CZ crkkk 4 L.. : 4 f: ii: OL 2 : h }:!34Y Kytir 01 7 - :y6oiiv{ AYi :Q vett tot c� ,Ei3\I cu 4 0 4mi .— t›-' ..ivAlo, 1._t2,,,,-- toll .4,,0„.::„..... •_riit„,m...', M O N. 0 N o0 = p LU O O N N-4- d u- Eft ft W N ( d' O > O O d' t` C- 0 01 ""- N M al C M 00 5 CO N N o LU E N M CO 0) ,- 00 0 >- u•• EA- Lo - tfAEft N O N N N(s) L.L. -' O va CI N E > i N Cy r-- 00 4; -t' p 00 LO COC td r- C'7 LO � m O V N >- LL COIN M0 O o O O O o O O N C\1_ N N Cj r- r- 01 L CO M c•') 01d � t O N 45 U C �(13 E E ;=+ N �0 >, — O w "' ON To w > p a° O N L N- s- N 0) O M C) O> : LL O >. 2 CD > O N V ti O w Tti O r- N� 00 -1411 V. O Z �C d' N co L L1 V > (''''''.'':':,'.:'..':''.'..''','''',''''.':''.•':''':!:'''„•',' ;iiiiiiii 6-':'.;';':':i':::'.:':;;;;I:';,ea o.10,10 8 111111 8 otill:i11:111'''„; I--- 0 u, 0 1.„,,,,,,,Iii,...,„Lo,,,Iii::,,,,,,,,,,,iiiii. -.:„„,„:„„,,„,„„,-- -0 w 0 i.,:$!:".,,,,,,r,,061•11%,,.! W N NN ..i. 05,„,,.:,.,.,,,..„,.,,,.:::,,..:„,,:,,,,,:,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 0 L .� w CD N W 6R Ef} >, 173.4) ti p Co ♦••� i U) — cg te-z o fl ON-_ 0N MO =_ N ,,,,miii,:,,,,,,,;ce) 1713 5 c::i (66 < !IS .......„".,....:",": Eigi','::1 fil. Ce) 0 ta 4:111! '„'''''''':::':', .,iiiialig 014 11111 1111111:1115 rOCf:)O` O' tid t2 COO NwdMN O t0> O (6:01 �N O "NM<iii:• CoLZ N 14;........... LL tft_ ;:`S:n� ii1f,. Cl) v U kii O •4.'Y•. : cf)— iiiii,;..;:.,.!...:::::,..,....-0)" N> ,-- 1,1 C H' • s Town of Oro Valley GENERAL FUND Budget Compared to Actuals Report Through November 30, 2002 Percentage of Year Completed 5/12=42.0% November Y-T-D 2002/2003 Percentage of Actuals Actuals Total Budget Budget Completed REVENUES: Local Taxes $ 433,432 $ 1,768,231 $ 6,282,000 28.1% Licenses& Permits 128,329 657,219 1,852,000 35.5% Federal Grants 9,279 55,366 289,478 19.1% State Grants 9,852 35,692 66,500 53.7% State Shared 562,898 2,601,135 6,706,270 38.8% Other Intergovernmental 57,942 57,942 516,771 11.2% Charges for Services 21,441 216,203 395,384 54.7% Fines 14,811 75,513 200,000 37.8% Interest Earnings 17,046 70,205 275,000 25.5% Miscellaneous 72 27,702 63,500 43.6% Fund Balance Carryforward 9,001,884 TOTAL REVENUES $ 1,255,102 $ 5,565,208 $ 25,648,787 33.4% EXPENDITURES: Town Council $ 13,254 $ 57,818 $ 146,120 39.6% Town Clerk 17,784 93,987 290,299 32.4% Magistrate Court 33,057 166,906 495,824 33.7% Town Manager 22,474 124,377 343,778 36.2% Human Resources 18,624 87,072 226,747 38.4% Economic Development 65,948 127,023 797,864 15.9% Finance 32,138 179,760 465,676 38.6% Information Systems 48,916 166,154 353,423 47.0% Legal 29,450 161,104 609,471 26.4% Community Development Administration 21,700 130,462 389,463 33.5% Planning &Zoning 86,148 314,277 904,817 34.7% Parks&Recreation 244,571 710,915 1,501,917 47.3% Library Services 52,378 214,730 1,006,717 21.3% Geographical Information Services 15,851 32,570 125,596 25.9% Police 646,981 2,977,582 8,180,357 36.4% Police-Grant Contingency - - 43,000 0.0% Building Safety 69,320 364,609 1,106,230 33.0% Public Works 22,347 112,113 336,597 33.3% Custodial&Facility Maintenance 10,106 47,238 153,163 30.8% General Administration: Operations& Maintenance 27,064 164,487 429,858 38.3% Improvements 93,386 478,102 801,753 59.6% Equipment - - Transfers to Other Funds 1,081,553 1,134,954 95.3% Contingency - 5,805,163 0.0% TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 1,571,497 g $ 7,792,837 $ 25,648,787 39.3% REVENUE LESS EXPENDITURES $ (316,395) $(2,227,630) FUND BALANCE AT JULY 1, 2002 $ 9,871,155 CURRENT FUND BALANCE $ 7,643,525 Town of Oro Valley HIGHWAY FUND Budget Compared to Actuals Report Through November 30, 2002 Percentage of Year Completed 5/12=42.0 November Y-T-D 2002/2003 Percentage of Actuals Actuals Total Budget Budget Completed _REVENUES: Licenses&Permits $ 2,907 $ 12,322 $ 12,000 102.7% ~ 0 - 110,000 0.0% PAG Reimbursements State Shared Fuel Tax 180,257 703,312 2,365,000 29.7% Charges for Service 47 3,901 12,000 32.5% Interest Income 3,719 12,661 20,000 63.3% Miscellaneous 160 670 5,000 13.4% Fund Balance Carryforward 1,217,751 TOTAL REVENUES $ 187,089 $ 732,866 $ 3,741,751 29.0% EXPENDITURES: Personnel $ 80,460 $ 401,233 $ 1,119,260 35.8% "Operations&Maintenance 57,574 228,560 855,963 26.7% Capital Improvements 159,507 469,316 1,256,500 37.4% Equipment&Vehicles - - Contingency - - 510,028 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 297,542 $ 1,099,109 $ 3,741,751 34.0% REVENUE LESS EXPENDITURES $ (110,452) $ (366,242) FUND BALANCE AT JULY 1, 2002 $ 1,688,713 CURRENT FUND BALANCE $ 1,322,471 Town of Oro Valley PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION FUND Budget Compared to Actuals Report Through November 30, 2002 Percentage of Year Completed 5/12=42.0% November Y-T-D 2002/2003 Percentage of Actuals Actuals Total Budget Budget Completed REVENUES: Federal Grants $ - $ - $ 194,400 0.0% Local Transportation Assistance Funds 16,596 67,982 177,550 38.3% Charges for Services 2,070 13,005 30,000 43.4% Interest Income 336 2,680 2,000 134.0% Other Financing Sources - - 53,401 0.0% Fund Balance Carryforward 127,067 TOTAL REVENUES $ 19,002 $ 83,667 $ 584,418 18.3% EXPENDITURES: Personnel $ 18,194 $ 96,577 $ 262,424 36.8% Operations&Maintenance 4,131 21,625 93,994 23.0% Vehicles - - 228,000 0.0% Contingency Fund .1'TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 22,325 $ 118,202 $ 584,418 20.2% REVENUE LESS EXPENDITURES $ (3,323) $ (34,536) FUND BALANCE AT JULY 1, 2002 $ 155,548 CURRENT FUND BALANCE $ 121,013 r Town of Oro Valley TOWNWIDE ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FUND Budget Compared to Actuals Report Through November 30, 2002 Percentage of Year Completed 5/12=42.0% November Y-T-D 2002/2003 Percentage of Actuals Actuals Total Budget Budget Completed REVENUES: PAG Reimbursements $ 14,168 $ 276,335 $ 8,310,000 3.3% Interest-Investments 13,745 55,187 140,000 39.4% Development Impact Fees 78,312 355,416 1,004,000 35.4% Pima County Reimbursements 1,640,000 Miscellaneous 1,434 1,434 - 100.0% Fund Balance Carryforward 7,015,586 TOTAL REVENUES '$ 107,658 $ 688,371 $ 18,109,586 6.2% EXPENDITURES: Personnel $ 11,776 $ 85,446 $ 271,778 31.4% Operations&Maintenance 18,493 85,138 199,450 42.7% Capital Improvements 210,383 768,375 12,150,000 6.3% Equipment&Vehicles - - - Contingency 5,488,358 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1 $ 240,652 $ 938,959 $ 18,109,586 7.4% REVENUE LESS EXPENDITURES $ (132,993) $ (250,588) FUND BALANCE AT JULY 1, 2002 $7,304,671 CURRENT FUND BALANCE $7,054,083 Town of Oro Valley ORO VALLEY WTER CONNECTION FEES DEBT SERVICE FUND Budget Compared to Actuals Report Through November 30, 2002 Percentage of Year Completed 5/12=42.0% November Y-T-D 2002/2003 Percentage of Actuals Actuals Total Budget Budget Completed REVENUES: . Single-Family Connections $ 73,471 $ 318,283 $ 887,000 35.9% Commercial Connections - 42,840 200,000 21.4% Other Connections - 44,344 20,000 221.7% Interest-Investments 2,518 5,236 20,000 26.2% Fund Balance Carryforward 677,000 'TOTAL REVENUES $ 75,989 $ 410,703 $ 1,804,000 36.4% EXPENDITURES: Debt Service Payments $ - $ 1,127,000 0.0% Contingency - 677,000 0.0% TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ - 4 $ - $ 1,804,000 0.0% REVENUE LESS EXPENDITURES 1 $ 75,989 $ 410,703 FUND BALANCE AT JULY 1, 2002 $ 622,974 CURRENT FUND BALANCE $ 1,033,677 Town of Oro Valley ORO VALLEY WATER CONNECTION FEES FUND Budget Compared to Actuals Report Through November 30, 2002 Percentage of Year Completed 5/12=42.0% November Y-T-D 2002/2003 Percentage of Actuals Actuals Total Budget Budget Completed REVENUES: Interest-Investments $ 5,293 $ 27,741 $ 75,000 37.0% Fund Balance Carryforward 5,704,945 TOTAL REVENUES $ 5,293 $ 27,741 $ 5,779,945 37.0% EXPENDITURES: Operations& Maintenance $ - $ 803,215 $ - 223,080 882,605 3,472,000 25.4% Capital Outlay Contingency - 2,307,945 0.0% TOTAL EXPENDITURES ' $ 223,080 $ 1,685,819 $ 5,779,945 48.6% REVENUE LESS EXPENDITURES $ (217,787) $(1,658,079) FUND BALANCE AT JULY 1, 2002 $ 5,673,647 CURRENT FUND BALANCE $ 4,015,568 Town of Oro Valley ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY Budgeted Income Statement Through November 30, 2002 Percentage of Year Completed 5/12=42.0% November Y-T-D 2002/2003 Percentage of Actuals Actuals Total Budget Budget Completed OPERATING REVENUES: — Water Revenues $ 711,617 $ 3,282,167 $ 7,736,261 42.4% Service Charges&Meter Income 28,890 230,576 426,500 54.1% Miscellaneous - 104 - 100.0% TOTAL REVENUES $ 740,507 $ 3,512,847 $ 8,162,761 43.0% OPERATING EXPENSES: "Personnel $ 108,466 $ 546,957 $ 1,583,943 34.5% Operations&Maintenance 328,937 1,027,407 2,910,388 35.3% `Depreciation118,568 592,841 1,601,600 37.0% &Amortization TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES $ 555,971 $ 2,167,205 $ 6,095,931 35.6% OPERATING INCOME $ 184,537 ' $ 1,345,643' $ 2,066,830 65.1% NON-OPERATING REVENUES(EXPENSES) Interest Income $ 16,630 $ 63,611 $ 300,000 21.2% Interest Expense 306,744 900,749 2,088,687 43.1% TOTAL NON-OPERATING REVENUES (EXPENSES) $ (290,114) $ (837,138) $ (1,788,687) 46.8% NET INCOME $ (105,578) $ 508,505 $ 278,143 RETAINED EARNINGS AT JULY 1, 2002 $ 5,916,545 $ 4,901,682 CURRENT RETAIINED EARNINGS $ 6,425,050 $ 5,179,825 Town of Oro Valley ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY Capital Budget Through November 30, 2002 Percentage of Year Completed 5/12=42.0% November Y-T-D 2002/2003 Percentage of Actuals Actuals Total Budget Budget Completed CAPITAL BUDGET Meters $ 6,189 $ 24,099 $ 100,000 24.1% Wells 31,303 655,000 4.8% Booster Stations 5,870 520,818 712,500 73.1% Transmission/Distribution Main 218 17,057 1,418,375 1.2% Naranja 12 inch D Zone Main 12,124 12,124 - Reservoirs 27,401 133,531 820,000 16.3% Water Plan #14 - 5,000 - Structures - 85 240,000 0.0% Telemetry - 291 - Vehicles 25,620 25,620 28,500 89.9% Machinery & Equipment 17,017 34,495 234,900 14.7% TOTAL CAPITAL BUDGET $ 94,440 $ 804,422 $ 4,209,275 _ 19.1% 1,1E TRA, 41 II OFFICE OF THE RICHARD J.PETRENKA CAROL SPRINGER Chief Deputy Treasurer Treasurer tatt Jri aoun r (602)542-1448 STATE CAPITOL (602) 542-1463 1700 WEST WASHINGTON NEAL E. HELM Deputy Treasurer Arttrna 85110 7-2 81 a Investments (602)542-5815 (602)542-1495 (602)542-7176 (FAx) TOLL FREE(877) 365-8310 November 22,2002 r1v3`i � 1:42 �"F =_-tM ;c• Kathryn Cuvelie Oro Valley-HURF/LTAF 11000 North La Canada Drive Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 Dear Ms. Cuvelier: As a Local Government Investment Pool (LGIP) participant, we are writing to let you know that the LGIP currently holds asset-backed securities issued by NPF-12 trust that are serviced by National Century Financial Enterprises (NCFE). These securities are backed by payments from Medicare/Medicaid and other creditworthyissuers. They amount to $131 million of the total $4 billion in the LGIP. Many large institutional investors also hold these securities. Recently, NCFE has come under investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation,the Securities and Exchange Commission and various state authorities for possible fraud and violations of federal and state laws. Moody's has also downgraded the trust's credit rating from AAA to Ba3. At this time the securities continue to pay interest at the stated rate, but in the interest of disclosure we feel it is important to inform you of this event. These securities amount to approximately3.2% of the total LGIP, and we are taking steps to protect the interests of the LGIPPP artici ants. We have met and discussed the matter with the Auditor General and the Attorney General's Office, and they are consulting with us on any further action to be taken. In order toq P rovide for equity in the valuation and final resolution of this security, all LGIP participants as of todaywill be allocated a proportional share of the value of the $131 million in NPF-12 securities, and this P P will be P P laced in a separate pool. As the securities pay interest (payments are current) and we receive distributions of principal, it will be paid to all participants of the new pool on a pro-rata basis. Upon final P P legal resolution the temporary pool will be dissolved. We thank your for ou patience in this matter. We will continue to bring you up-to-date on any significant Y developments as they occur. Sincerely, Richard J. Petrenka Chief Deputy State Treasurer RJP/mpv itA 11 i! RICHARD J.PETRENKA CAROL SPRINGER OFFICE OF THE Chief Deputy Treasurer Treasurer State Treasurer (602)542-1448 STATE CAPITOL 602 542-1463 1700 WEST WASHINGTON NEAL E.HELM Deputy Treasurer Phoenix, Arizona 85007-2812 Investments (602)542-5815 (602)542-1495 (602)542-7176(FAx) TOLL FREE(877)365-8310 December 3, 2002 Dear LGIP Participants: This letter is to you date on the status of the National Century Financial Enterprises' CFE bonds that we notified you about in our November 21, 2002 letter. We were informed today (NCFE) by the trustee for the bonds that they did not receive the interest payment due December 1, 2002. NCFE is currently under the auspices of a bankruptcy court and the judge in the case must rule on any distribution of money,including bond interest payments. We are awaiting word from the trustee on any further developments and will keep you informed as soon as weg et information. For now, the proportional shares of the new NCFE pool will be reflected as a withdrawal onY our November statement that will be sent as usual on or around December 12. In the future a complete NCFE pool accounting will be included on a supplemental . a e. In order toprotect the State's interests and those of pool participants we are also pursuing legal pg action to the fullest extent possible,individually or in conjunction with other bondholders. As Your alwayssupport and patience in this matter are appreciated and we will continue to fight for a fair resolute to this matter. Sincerely, Richard J. Petrenka Chief Deputy State Treasurer RJP/mpv Arizona League of (602) � _ •Fax:(602)253-3874 T Washington•Phoenix,AZ 85007•Phone: 2�8 5786 0001.- I820 W.� � Webb site:v���vv azleague.org -- _ Tow Email:league@mg.state.az.us• Cities AND ns October 15, 2002 TO: City/Town Managers or Clerks and Finance Directors FROM: Catherine F. Connolly, Executive Director SHARING URBAN REVENUE FOR NEXT FISCAL YEAR income on proceeds from the tax from two years prior. The city/town share of the state tax is calculated in 1972 to make sure that cities and towns were receiving We included this provision in the initiative tremendous dropsin state This has meant that the recent their share on net income tax collections. ar or for this current fiscal income tax receipts have not been reflected in urban revenue sharing last year year. that cities and towns share in the markedly ' which begins on July1, 2003, will be the first year � �' will be reduced by $70 million; although reduced income tax collections. The total sharecity/town . . � A city should be anticipated for FY OS by the exact figure is not known an even bigger reductionthis will be the first g enclosed. To the best of our knowledge, citylistingof the impact of this reduction is sharing in the 30 years of urban revenues g that the total actually decreased. reductions in income tax sharing. However, been statements byGovernor Hull about futureThemillion There have . . before her term of office ends. $70 itappear that a special session will take place be does not � ro sal would have cut more dollars noted above happenspo reduction without any legislative action•her p on top of the $70 million. ' candidates the importance of state shared that you have communicated with your legislative We hope • • services. We also hope that you have shared with toyour budgets and the provision of local An revenuesg foryou to balance your city or town budget.them what sof cutbacks have been necessary We need to �� and can afford a cut in shared revenues. im impression persists that cities and towns are rich P dispel 1 that impression with the facts of the true situations. As always, call if you have questions. ... . _ SHARED INCOME TAX DISTRIBUTIONS ....... The sharp decline in state income tax collections will begin to impact urban revenue sharing in FY'04. The $70 million reduction will decrease each city and town's share as displayed in the chart below. POPULATION FY2003 FY2004 $ DECREASE ,,,;.,,,',„,'-.AP r,,..... Miig ;. ":-..'”-eilPtRI;i:?-*;;;1-4<;1„=.t4:1,4 AVONDALE 35,883 $3,821,502 $3,195,243 $626,259 ---tt,..,"'fi'a:4"-ii-mig-tIliz-giii4V-T14414-ii*77,7N-414iii-Intli':-V6- 7:::;-;:;z?4,:ciwo' .,„ ,,,,i:155,41•141.kmfzfe#:-. ., ,,,,,,g,t,,-"-",-,-.1,t,--.-^,-S"_ -A'','"'t,•:.''..,- BISBEE 6,090 $648,579 $542,291 $106,288 0,-y--,,-.L.-5,:,n.-t---;3,Ar-r-,,,,,--... ,,,c.:t11,.. -- 7.7-02,4-i-,..,&fitioskwVift:-.4frA0-3k...,,a144..egt:1+LAVIZegfitEg-%!..1f,Y-f-',--44zft. 'irlve-:* ,-- -0:Nt:st..--.1-17..4 v,,.,--N.,..= ...,-.4..*IV---7.4..- -,., ,-, ,A-4,4671-,,,24-1...• , -,,-1,re-4:1Ance4e-:. 4,4.4_„-.....,---.,-,:.,,,::,..-- ,,,,,,,,,,,-",,, -,,,,,.. BULLHEAD CITY 33,769 $3,596,363 $3,006,999 $589,364 teowlp....„,..--A, ..-z, 4k-Frai,,vti-:oszi,ofinfi,::z;;-:s;;iixt.4)aftr,- -4pdteic;,,Kezkri, Efo,i-.;--,f,,--., ,,,,,,, ..,.,.,.i -,:,,,,,,..,...-:„,,,,,-,-,..-,,,,.7..,,e,f.,..,ava,,,,,,,,,-,,,,,,,,,,,,...41-i.W.-4,4",-n...",-'•' , --,•.'="2.--'C.,.-..-',3'14,--,--'7 . CAREFREE 2,927 $311,722 $260,638 $51,084 ---;-*--: A,,, ,- -,,,--- Y-----Tli- i•-- T43:4" 01'...:1V:1-shA'eaterA-:qt.(A,r,:?,:`,:fi)---if r-4,,,,,,g,40.,i,,-;?;-,--'d,. ,::::,295.„, *,.6''''''"': ,,,,''‘'•%1:::-....',.. ,"i2-:,:',,e,k?,-, -.. ---..2'‘''''''')•''V tY:',".V.- CAVE CREEK 3,728 $397,028 $65,064 ,,,-,,,,,,,p.,,,,,,,,, ..,- . --;,.,g„,,,,...,,,,,,,---..---.7. ,44.4wa.w..,..1- 4-:-.;c. ....,•..4 .0-41,-rp.f.gzereiitiz,: ---z -4 -;:-.r:v_,..,-,,,i:r4vili.91 t 5.1,,, $!L"”''.1;p:.;-,....,,,,,,:**,,,,,oi. CHINO VALLEY 7,835 $834,419 $697,676 $136,743 --t,"77.Nt4e,„44:,;-,*Z, -..-,....i- .,--,eir-a-,,r,,,,- _-y--,-?--v'--21',.'t-,-,rvry4,-,,,.::,.. ,,,,,•41:-,-,...:; .1.31.11 -.''._ ,,.,..• • .-•,•,..:,-1.,..:,,,,'".6.1".~,--?,4--.,^.' : - ,'..--f'-1,,,,,s,. ' CLIFTON 2,596 $276,471 $231,164 $45,307 !7*-......--,4,,,,,,4:44•-1"a _.„... ..,.:..... •,..- .,„,. e.- COOLIDGE 7,786 $829,201 $693,313 $135,888 COc.,..,-e,...-1,..eT4z- n . a ‘. ',- 'Ne.:Vs;•<., ....-_,', ,- •=,.., '',.., ,,...:,r, •''1,-,-",-''''''".14,t4r'z•.-,4,4-.. .,4,,. DOUGLAS 14,312 $1,524,213 $1,274,428 $249,785 !!,...17*,-,,'`..::::;t14:Zr:13-41,1,:z1, _ ‘,. _., ,s, _,, 4.,,,t,„ ,....,,r„A •;,-,,,,,g;s',,,,,!,•,.ii?„,..--, Alt-t •-,--, -•-..,-,!..,;.".-,:'".t.f'''..!..i'.."--A$1.`'-'7,.'" EAGAR 4,033 $429,510 $359,123 $70,387 :i..r,i_v,,e,-,,$ .,. ,,„- ii...-„A c„,,,A-, _,,,,A,.../.: .1,-...,4 .,..,,,,,,, . y • „.„...,:ii.- , ,,,ft•. ,--s- ..r,,..-..,4-,4-x,,---4-,f7-41.7,;:-.,..,,- 4,,,•, ,r,- 17,-------- •. 0-4,1:71.e.*' -I"::-',.r 1-i., ..`,16}P,1:,---,*T4,-,* ---,?-4 0 WA.. ,:f-,:„..-z,• litE, or.„-i„,„0„.„y„, •ELOY 10,375 $1,104,927 $923,854 $181,073 .ajratiw4-:..: _,...--,,,...„.:<...,-,..,.-----5......e.,--w,'3,,..--",r31,-,.. ..?:.....;7/4=47,2,•,- 4."7,,,,,,,iv j•,,,,,,,,4,,,,s.,,,,I,,,,,,,,P; ',r,..-4,,,..--,5, ,--...., J.-4k:,.. •',',--.•.-,.,,,,oz.,,,..;.44,4,,,,,,,Ar,, FLORENCE 14,466 $1,540,614 $1,288,141 $252,472 ---- 7, 4-40-MWA"--v.,0.-:-.I1-47M-A,v2.33-4 .:xica•oxiivyttl -ove,ror,-,,,,:n. p ....a ,_ , 4, ,, •-•, , ,,. ' ...,...., WO / / .....,. ."' 6 /,6 5-,„5 , •-• s ,,,,,,,•-,...,,..A i>gl•, .,,.,..„. ,,,_.0,--,4".,',:,;,--,.,. ,,,,- ,41:,,-.',,,, ,,,,.,,. . Ar,,-...#4.,f P:::=,,,r,,,-....o-, ,-,--st-Ff''',-- '-•- ,..-Z1/44.-,,,,,,,,,,, rt-14 FREDONIA 1,036 $110,333 $92,252 $18,081 ,. ri Ne,',.r,r'•=,:-.',...1-0,1-.W,,,F4"V:',',:eii, ' V,,-;:,!"7,,,,',"... L -A;';:'"SV.;...,''...,..:-S-, 'he",',;7,..i":, .- ,- ., , -•ire,/.,,--.•-4 1 hai D . u-;.n...y.,,,,,,,,,,„,!...,,,,,,,,,,40.,,W6 •-•,,,, „,•,.,..3ZMAX,b i„-,,,-,.....,, ,,„-...,x...4,, . - . 4.4 i:-,,--,7,•:,4;--_,;-4::'''''.--?,. .4.- ,•,,,,: GILBERT 109,697 $11,682,615 $9,768,094 $1,914,521 -,.--A ,,,, .itti-e.6...wite:xF'--,.$56,:i-ept,w Z.,-,:igil*f.,,...7--, :,D-Ar4:44,.:_ma--.; . . .,,,,,,,,.., , . ,,,-,,, . -...• GLOBE 7,486 $797,251 $666,599 $130,652 -i-._,",-:„0, A,.).-i.T.-i, ,',.-i..,e, -T;Irsf Y-la:...,...., - ws,,.-1AA4:::4p.wp4,!,,tv-hilw5t,....orici-r.--,..}T..}4-wsgi7.4--,AAntx., GUADALUPE 5,228 $556,776 $465,533 $91,243 ,--4P4fkv-33_Ywf.iik---LtTfieiv-o- fp.z_,e,:, ,OVi 't,'S.:WiAiqv:ar-'-,?j,:-,'-" ,-i,'M'f-r.s;,' ,.•-,-.-',-,:-'.•:-='s•-rbei.'---r':(:;47'• --.*‘Nt.17.-.J2,4,-- ,.24.. .z.v47--. ----4...,:izia4r4, --.---,,,,,, ,,-,-t-Y-.7-0--'m..., ':•.=-,';'f,-;--:.r,-,,,z---- • -4:;:-- ---a'---s-=- P.-1--r---1,!s!.' HOLBROOK 4,917 $523,655 $437,840 $85,815 It-14-14-1104;:aniq slAtit'X'A,-,-;f4f-p, 4,,W AfjitiAaV,:iF,"r;Tefri...,:zr,:jj.)1kZ;it41.:-fii,,ry;.Zo, ‘,.- JEROME 329 $35,038 $29,296 $5,742 'w•-ieNat'il!!5.7' 4;4:-:-,47.141 6.,,,,„k.,-,-,,P , -,:-''',:ifi,-*Y.:.----4:%3ItiT4',H,1747, 7-P).t•6.144,Vi•-= ,*-----,-6- 5.0'-1,t,--,---2 •-,,,,,,t,-•.,..--,-..!1-'-..• - .:Z.,2,--1,,),''''...e,',i1"--,--,/''. KINGMAN 20,069 $2,137,327 $1,787,067 $350,260 LITCHFIELD PARK 3,810 $405,761 $339,266 $66,495 4rp1.,_lv6 -- A .. ,. , ,-:-..--t•.-.±.-..--,-`,c..1-4-47-6-:'I- ii-- ,- MARANA 13,556 $1,443,700 $1,207,109 $236,590 Prepared by: League of Arizona Cities Towns October 2002 s N FY2003 FY2004 DECREASE POPULATION . P ,, : � Y,M <�•,+"1.c2�y,.ssqq�,r -3.; y'-::-,41-''.;',!•7,-,- .:�,f•�Ili, l�v,,'6.7`'.�!,' ��n���,q,--;.- �3)r'^n/�+� L • �,.� �' a»'. +:a+r,;w:' ..?,inaBYp'- `t,`•C,. g-. / w w...- ilk'; '• y .A'> s... >;"'TPer�,t.% n:":17,y;x�A ..,p, S.,.J:<d<,<y' 3d fN r :f A .h. �,. nrs6 "�..., f K4A,..,...„...„...„,,,,,..... i1' n`�' .YwC is-, 398 aF3k J���� f��-..� !ate� ���.�"` >�;$,,�> -,,,,,,,-0..,.,,,,,,,,A14,...„' ' 6r':e>�k3"7[/K '`'a:.. d•<n ('g; j ylVS k �.� ¢ �� � :"� �� � ��.� . $33,7 �,. . $206,182 �z,' I1,936 �,�,$172,393�.� �•�_��:�, .. �.,.,�,� �� MIAMI rn . .. � � -' ,.+- ... >,;y_ !...- 77 Z h'''',,,A'2'4'',?:A 4e b. � +yr 1 r L �*. s�1 -r,.o ';' ..r, .,R:7'^' _.;:.'•: d C ` �t,r, .r' � `_V.x`> Y>,'.. Q� '..E.s�A•.r -- �4„�,`•• ��`� •• ��..- -- �I�rY� .•,,rZ <'�.r n),<•"�,f:' � 'y"sa; {�u< :.i'" 7�� �'�,`4.►� � -t A.. ..,. '3•�.,.,'e'!.�;>�' .�''J,C,�.:,... •< d..x.�.�q `."<. �� � d ��� n � :.r ; ,r.,-ff:. >, $518,348 ':,-.':,...t.2;,' � ��111 .Y�Y:,r: _:: r �......i!.,`. ,,_� g 29 700 $3,163,019 $2,644,670 „,......................--7, ORO VALLEY , -. ,ss 0 ��,r. , �.. -:."ri> -...-. .. i`.y..<a!_. n<C'..,y %3. �/t4=„ i, { y ^AY D to-Q�3�s���''�`'�re",-'8! .f `z� re, < , i': :;r .�,• ..xs:Z 3r/' s;` �!�(,r- .s,>� ,,,ird'�''• ��•%`3 �� �' - Y f_p � .. "<r.,•Y> .�i:.a�� <?'R�.:'w�>-:1.-.,3, 1,111. .. `i ,;w7.,:. / c,,..'<6 c. Adc !i►.�-. Q_A K" .. '8:: a ,r'�/,4i '�",r%`sc�`?'n`• :�a.�h.w«n•` �w�•,Trbs i-.F'•H ,.'r h, ,2. s• 7 {,fj,b:4 y< w.�,.a��"i3x:,.:s••.. X� �.��� ��� �� �� .� ..��..^ ����nr..���� _ $238,475. .:.nr ���,�:..��:���:„�-���•�..�.fi..��..<� p" -/'" � 13,664 $1,455,202 $1,216,726 VALLEY -y Y�., PARADISE + � �v�,k��' 1 T�,�,+,��{�, a '?Y{Y2 .w.<yi vx<: �' hS'� `.n•,. '� '� Fa`TSF' r � �F�FF SWC ` y n5.- Jk9':!'r:. sr 2' ,09.4. r ),. UT; j ,y> <x,' 3 0.:�. �8 p171 {;. t4 { �c ?%;..' -.�. }s$:..7.4:'*,:::iiit,';;!'-ra3.,s..:,•. ..> ,a•�'�'n 4��^.PR ,,o�i?••o,y�:" V�'�'��� '5.�,�•'+'f 5 ,,,x:!FJr.� '�9 '�, `�s . � � 1.�.o:,.x.>. . �X. , . $78,450 $15,376 �: r:J 881 $93,826 PATAGONIA - � .- �,�� .gars, .`. : }p ,•.Y.�:'Y'`.'S'iQ,'k0!`?^9?c'.� -•i-rhs,'y'.;vif�.-:9".:K ..P.,,,-,-4,,,r r r: r� �.d �y7p/7 x�. �j�,'(,.� a' '�:.� ►,',,•'�`f�,�i.r,ate.�� ,.0�.P ,¢""r$'ti��.>>b VW- '"F`70:^ C:',,"I' r, ,> 2. .' b3,, rV,9•w''� +�' ..t:, s-�{+r�.'.`• ,.• a,",.®°+-fi. .c r,,<., ,x;.'17.7..++..f M. -,.661 J: z- la:< d $ . a 0 l"s ? :•Y`"1'' :�:. e. x,, r..:.' '- :f, ��;: .��;�.�... �:<. .��-��vw�a.k�' �s�_ ..� . :5:.,�,J_;. a_ 81,256 t.�;�. ,.,�Y�"` $1 8 PEORIA 108,364 $11,540,652 $9,649,396. . � 2 .-_1111...,...,;......_.;...,1111 •�y;'�,�q` "°`f>:%• :.7.77;,4 `,�zat•'7••V: g' �� �qG -:�`�� D�',' ;la gn,774"3 dy s.: 3' '' :4�.t 4pe.`.�.`((y�yy)4. -.-�c i', :e•. ), ,y, it;,,,,,,,,,:.*41.7-,,,,........;,...,.4.2.-_, ?":iT>..x .6,77-7-F:4:74,10:4„,;;-77.41`. < •< � '??�°,-K� a'744- F• � �;�„.`e i' -Yo,'"1>F Q'1 �i•�'.' i5: �V .J - +- .-'fit x, ,, ; $- B ,(.>, ' 'it , i ''tee•' Lw"�f'`",- :,,..r3 ,,...s',T"=�, ;,,„, "a....... ...., . ,,..,,.;3s >N. ,7'rF°...�a..- ,.:.'�•r>•!u�'.'a'w,,>w., fc`y.,� 4y'' :;, ,>x' 71 4 '� 1,989 $211,826 $177,113 $34 PIMA ..ty tk!-- _'-;�-. { >a ��Nmx "� w� -r���+ _gyn.d" t qis � iw^y.C. k f�-.''�•.`i^k>' s�-.k.r} 0� 1 ';,,,..-.13w1.7,....,,,, t1 ,�� T .�:a:4; �=. sA � � �,� �r.�r�� F � f=���"� Rz#sar�T�r� ,� •,iit .•s .4. y1 t . PRESCOTT 33,938 $3,614,361 $3,022,048 $592,313 3 -...,,,,i-77,15-, �cS ,,,,-;;Ii ,.y,i t,�, i--� .,.e,;:1�� : y/f.W/- rKYL+A a. 7' = ,otir,17-;m:..", 3�'"a,ri �raeq '��t .. ?+, _ .„,� �. '. ae, r3��.�1, <R VeQ. �.. a< nr !R ' •; r.r/ •r7: .,nr{.-e4., v: z+ �x �.66 ?, 1','^> QUARTZSITE 3,354 $357,197 $298,661 $58,537 yv s fi; !.-7 e ?iUEsE 5-�$C, Y-_.x ,!'�rl'Jy,:o� •'yq^t� 'yYkm ;y` .,.f'a- .'�._a� f4z ;,,,• rt,y:L �•fi .,6',." g, c 1 1.11 m. a , A.. --J,:o- rnc .`.1 v..a ,., -' fi L,,,,..:,,,��„ :. <�.�, . -,,�. <JoM _. ,, , >t.^ ,:Eha . 6 y >.,® • rau %Af .B.,,:.r- a r.x ^r�'fy>�; s :,'���•.... " SAFFORD 9,232 $983,198 $822,074 $161,124 r;,.. AR %'- ,�j ;.,` g , �•� a °aYY �::, d `%L 7.; ,;:-.4177 yf1: .»!" WX "0✓:5:4'Jittr .tzlg�-�r7" V7 • �^,?M411^M 1...\,*>„Y .:<.,A.V"7,47,-..%'- • V�0�� 11 ? .te, � .�..01111- >.-'g *,,��`>..f: y, .. 11:7;4.at-3`�"':a .Q ._ r_-., S % xer;76' • y®-. :b• a ST.JOHNS 3,269 $348,145 $291092 $57,053 ��yy. .��� :.:,:f7.--;;•7;,,,' ��.s�`-'.Y T. wYF,�h:•i �✓r.��<:wu'. ?7,L at y��.,yp�pyy <,�• ' .?^./.' !,:T'- _�y,�yp '�•' ,�`�--- L, i,�'�,':r+ �.. •r 5•y t:'J k/�,,0..'�:/ -,ad'�'���b, ► a'<f1e. L� :br _,�.,,. .r,<'.7✓" vw K�,r'8:'. d.�-.T,l' ![,,`���+h<.r �z�, y � r 4' "'4 4:` ..ya�it b��"�.i-F� •' Lr4.:,.,f-,,V .l�F.- y..h ,<; ,°b, T a5 "9�• 'Fi�nSG :?,..•r.v'•G.a- .�.a ..t .... ,Xb` `•" s 'i� i -1 '!` ./ _4_}} �-a ;•1 -h:- 'y'' ,p ^.,y,6. ,<,y a „3,`�` '•! :..,ah A "^e' -. ,. w����'bC�w ��'���,F�'7,2�' � . ,��45".i&i? ..���_.. 'y,�..�.o<•Kv�''{�`:e :,<.:s.? �.. .re,..�«.� ::�. . � � :•Y, .:.<. ...�., �. . $3,537,772 SCOTTSDALE 202,705 $21,587,869 $18,050,097_ • _ „K ,,pr ;t< ";r�• :7,b/",�, ,ry�sr•lo-'z°,�?';m-'^,.y�'-'<s '-"^'>"'°°'° `. m''¢rev y�"'Lfsic1X� t �� m ;,i-..,-,..-.... • �{�.,{,-�^,'°�`$���>• 'rw •:%�� Y" •y'. .n�i .&•a'�'i..i r �iD�6 ,y�y.-J ,GGYt.F„ -'fie. �� O`...�',r��✓%':'�'�'z--�'r�'a r v�-� .�y ..r,:�lf:`?r'n .' A ,c,S- rr- /J, c 3o- 6 6B ,';':,',#,:,4„,,,,,...ook. g 7 ,yr•�'2=""s:v:'i.:,i f-.1,-,; :: r:. n. «✓ v wb- y A ,'<�p,y.';2� Jg`" '< �!^;" f J!k 'C s> ,:-..,,t.,;,,.,. ,,..- rv. ��7��� �� � -• �-�, , _ , �w. y�-�--�: .' - 685 210- $134,299_ $819 509 $ SHOW LOW 7,6955 rf .� � '� :Yro.: ?,• 1�y. �yS-' >:fc.�•..p•�r��.rs��, ^4?•Y7Y/S�•'R:C.'.°µ",+'.. �,, y ,a�fbl'vi�� �4". � -�� � � ►'® ® � !:,..5?- ,,::•4%-t7;7."7.7;'::i3. <i 3,n-'F• rT- ti'w • '• .:-,:FY<' $ a /:v:e. N y4ta7•xei<nlL:. �I::.:" ,.o. ,. „ 'ac •� i,'-vJ`6 r + 7 - ,,,y'h '� ,,,.-. '1'Z•'-',. -.- vr.:�, ..., � .� �- rM>,��c� ,�y✓egG k• jar, 'Y>'�..A ,.., ,,,,t,..:4.,.1.;:'. J 6,'rc: {�c,. ,: <, „�!"' :` y: >.. «,,• 1111 .x�_f � � �.,,, .,,�,><.�, y u .. _ 97 146 $77,840 SNOWFLAKE 4 460 _ $474,985 $3 , !. •->�•Qi>^•:�'•�TOY +AS.'�/ •.;y. r�4:�1T r'e.,,r.�'�'r �«"r >q,7>1J7rf:+71, `.Y'.:c:•' :';!.w.;.,.., tE ;c7ixr.%+fM�.z Y'" ,>z'-`i"Y,�p �' -, �`.' y',.,':e"`':f...., r•,:; ::b u' �a y- _ +'�'��'`��.o Y��'• 6'A:.r ��` „> .c;, . a ,;..<."t't. .('^., - - e - -> r fG;>i`rt,S_til t;' 1 0 0. .t z,.i„4>`.;•L<'..x;Ys:e.. ;`4.5�...io ....:,-- IS�'�,,:,,,,w,,,,,,,..,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,----,,,,,,,,, ,;f1,' �x <,yGo'r.' ': .. ftiA>i,: i�1; R� '-fit.� - ,� ✓i r 1"Y! ri' '7'" ,„ 5,v�cySfi<-> • ;3,10 „,�iYr�f � �k�� ° �� � y.i.. y''"• y�;,�i.2�"`.: - �? �.�??,,,•v� �>L,.:.%. °..,.� :-•, � ✓/�y� I'l ,°FS i ::. ...,w.•�J r:^: r.{•.9T,'-'"t^'>• _a'q+ 4`K<' SOUTH TU C.1,.S O N5,490 5�4..9 r.10..11 1•' . ..• `'$__58 4,6 7..9 .2.. $- 4 -'88- ,8 63 ...':$_. 95�•�,.. 8. 16 J �PJR! E ,1 ' ` f`�SteY--..F.'�;w( y N '��, �y� hi am� "�'��i, aizi ,V,0410.1.Vai,tc,,.' ,-- •-{ L7���z,,,�, . ,..,_ k�,:.. �' �, . :�%�Y.�� >"..,.,o �, y;r < !;..i.e�wg vs i".:. 'i., >`�£vfy64e _.4owi�pQ:.' •.✓, :a . SUPERIOR 3,254 $346,548 $289 756 $56,791 r,,,,:7175,,,,,,.,...,:4-„, ,• �Prc1 ® ®*9« ! ryo ; 11`,G �' '� y,t3�s. r ► L � �,wR,�� �� r - . � rLs' ,,-.4,? , �: -�,1�!Y„.9.7,..4Y:.;;,-,,_,-,!=?,. fi ,,f,,, f ' , . ��.�: 1117,. >: �w.s0yY - 1 . ,' �:..:.� � G��..�f,-.>•+e";.: .',r�.:. >.:,'.:.. '.,,..... 9. +ni.v,.._ L @. �`. y,-,-;,<''''.'''''': ;4;4'.i.'-'''''1".0.•.'-,... "_ (: .'MF-3 4ro•:,`,� .zIAA: ' .. '4 TAYLOR 3,176 $ 38,24 $282,811 $55,430 r.7,,,,,,..74-,-4,F,-:. ~.dY:, .r� , � .�.3��fi74 $2�'w , �`►jyY� _. A8��� d �knrta2 , .aTa' N _� , , ,:�1-1 ::>.�;i:�.�.K.,.�yi,a�, i.. ,,`,,,,. .r4.0.,;,,,,,''...,...�� .'. >� �y >:, 7', /[_'-".7,11'1.4.Y?...-::::x..41,..4. . ._r•, ..... ...,.- THATCHER 4,022 $428,339 $358,144 $70,195 roqfe:�va� bq� o�� :l ,Z�a!-.r;ipf:"y:;r*I ::irlrA; t8,'-�o^ . :4.raT;-:r„r r„" iiKe < *Liitil. TOMBSTONE.. : .. 1,504 $..1 60 17 4 $133,9-. 25_...,... ._. _.... $ 2 l6,249 rofd y�i_ .t�< 7 ;;J .Y I�:rtifiSo`,, ,0,:qpt/ A wAC ,r-: � ,4' - ;� p•t.4,jt4t • � :•.,i<..�.'4m ,<,�;N,,<rx£ ?„ Y,..���r,"�.�..� ,. -. -....,.-A-0,:,.,,,,5 Q .. _,<, c. : ,! d®_'W•�/i..< .ir. f , �w< WELLTON 1,829 $194,787 $162,865 $31,921 ��+ yew '�:� '�'� ;��� ',y ��� ��a�J�Y•���ar r • •' �, r '7' � u,. --b• y M��#'�f- :�_1 �4� •.� �K ' L �� � ,-'h's�'3r,�M�,}r✓�� {it�y64�'. .A3..,-', opt(1' �f'x'5'7 976• i "s'f'� � >'zs, ,r(: -s 3 +,Y h l :�.E.� ,.�� � - 111.,.N i 0��• Y;..� S`?r; �_sr �.. .. �$65 151 COX 3 733 $397,561 $332,409 WILL � . .... �;. t ::4: t•. .�' xY n�+••J' :/.� ?t' j Y`y..«" -3^�6 t 1 ifeben.f.$4,01W44/461.:tlir,.$�jy®o���."rn,i, 7 •>7t:^-.x-'iii.�yo� .:,-.(4,�'.`S.I,fY. ':r D 5.:4 /„ ,3° '�,".v^ -. ► . �..,`d, :3"*�1.:tl F^,�.. �F .t.,...51`x�o :�' w,�ev> `J' :>?'..:;,�"Y i• < Y.~ � {< c ^4®, � H'S "`r e.r�,C.,..�/K+ . - .,_.. .x.r,.y,, rm T l .f:t, 6r>, r 0 ^At 0`h.�e ii D ,r • .i. .:,. �F'f 1..� "'"a^yr. � �. ' ',V0,-7"1-,...117...W,`';-4.2,:-,:,,Y,.'; ,. �-s's'TY' ��-... ... :..urJt .. . .: .�� ���: :� ..,:,,,::::,,W,:.WINKELMAN 443 $47,179 $39,447 $7,732 ,y s"" �✓: �' �r. Y a / .: .f�;.a_•. !''',4r14ts,'.'e' ;-,J�rev.�!"'�t C#� �,,� -r ,p' ,- :.Jvyyiyp-i-:.tLo. y+.•a¢:,., ,.. t,t '� -,.;,-, ,'e 'E eAt•° .v ,'_.s>F Y!'1.�,e J..9e_. .h?<•�'. .,.� .i,, .uk <y, i/.,-. f . � n� ,,�•?. rr,,e+� •;'WG �<p1E � J ,7eC 5 ; 11, ,r.+��',�'�, %r�.' .i y ■■ a .'A as p.y i��0t-", .fir•,-".. w.!,-,',.,,. ',C:-•�1,-,,:... ...�"yF'�,.sa.'�y .± f=3" ,�.t:.•:. •l •e:.'.. ...,.::>(c`;es:"...>r: -,- ,i',--.5;-���J>YY, '�.,> �.�..4', n. . .....-. 52 533 $320,562 $268,029 $ YOUNGTOWN 3,010 � a.. :,.r:. > ..w..., .74.0%,"'";`,44,_:'+ta'' -. F" ay�._40X-,7,•a,. ..rte gt 'I 7O' •iS ' :, p .0 den ,msc• a'-�:zT"' -1:14"4,,`. `';E6" :.s`6a�4qi^'HF�'t.S � � {fir tr�'��f3` •�4�'r".��l,f 1 S4 '.r��•jZZ� �A's •e,.�„. :..,. ':'�.M.' ,+,¢._� •Y:.<t' y� :• w..,. ,.1i�{' .:.,t. s. i 6$>,` '46„..,:.0,', _..�ets:<... Sy wQ f-s• ,-tfri. •s',t:t,..,,,..7......_ . ar.>:,... C!+.•'•,:b !�•k•.}'" $/ A7<J L-Au �' `:,.14.64::17 1c,:�Z;".,{"�,( :77 1i--I<C<+< '�../;'"' /'M ._� y0'',--.:r''',.iz -- .` ,.r-l v4a.•, �b�,, 'IT>'+P! '�?fL <:�. f4-:,� .'Y a?:�7'+',//#`"'; aiC_ `f,�`r.�y:ro"<,.,v•.'r'hS .,Sa•XaY:^fk.2.,._. -.. 4 042,848 $430,559,053 $360;000,000 $70,559,053 TOTALS � a -16.39% Prepared by: League of Arizona Cities Towns October 2002 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: February 3, 2003 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Bryant Nodine, AICP, Planning and Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: DRAFT GENERAL PLAN UPDATE 2020 (OV11-01-04) BACKGROUND: This is the fourth staff report to the Council regarding the draft General Plan Update 2020 recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission on November 19, 2002. The Council meetings to date are: December 2 Study Session December 11 Public Hearing January 6 Public Hearing January 21 Special Session SUMMARY: The following sections highlight and address the discussions comments and observations of the January 21, 2003 special session. This report provides additional information, for the Council's consideration, on the recommended schedule for Plan adoption; the overarching General Plan goals; how the Plan is implemented once adopted; the Parks and Recreation, Community Design, and Housing elements; and the land use maps for specific properties including the State Trust land north of the Town and Kelly Ranch. The report format is as follows: TITLE (page references from the November 19, 2002 Planning and Zoning Commission draft) Comment/Issue Staff response/discussion Recommended Motion (where appropriate) REVIEW OF JANUARY 21, 2003 SPECIAL SESSION 1. Issue: Why continue to include policies addressing items now covered in Code or Design Guidelines? There is also need to refer to already adopted plans, ordinances and guidelines that address components of each given plan element. A number of policies throughout the draft plan involve issues that have generally been addressed through adoption of a code, a zoning district, or a design guideline. The action item accompanying such a policy often includes words and phrases like "continue to implement" or"review and update as necessary". Alternatively, the action may be stated in the present tense with the time frame of "ongoing". The reasons for continuing to include these types of policies are reinforcement, education, and having a legal tie from the major policy document of the community to the implementing ordinances and g guidelines. If the implementing tool is relatively new, communities often continue to restate the policy because of itsp erceived importance or as a continued reminder to regulators and the regulated that this remains a high priority. In the case of the Town, the community at the focus group sessions was asked g whether ap olicy from the existing 1996 plan was still relevant or had been sufficiently addressed. Those that remain in the plan update are ones that persons felt were still an issue either in terms of TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 12 keeping it in the public consciousness or to ensure that enforcement at the highest level would continue. It is not absolutely necessary to continue to include these types of policies, but it is desirable because of how the planning process evolved, because it does continue the legal tie from plan to ordinance particularly for relatively recent code additions, and because it emphasizes the importance of the issue. As for reference to adopted documents in the Town, it is a good idea to list the implementing items in the plan. More specific detail can be found in the Community Design Element discussion below. Recommended motion: For all plan policies fully or partly implemented, I move to change the language to reflect continuation of a policy. (See the section entitled Resolution of Key Issues below regarding other potential changes to policies.) 2. Issue: The document contains too much data which may be better addressed in a background report, and what may appear to be policy guidance appears in Element statements and key policy issues. The background information while potentially useful to a reader seeking a single information source does not have to appear in the plan document; instead, the source material in the background report can suffice. Language outside of plan policies and the administrative underpinnings of the plan is not intended to provide policy guidance and this can be edited. Recommended motion: The specific recommended motion is included in the section entitled Resolution of Key Issues, below. 3. Issue: Using the term "shall" in policies. Staff has previously provided the Council with a spreadsheet conducting an analysis of the policies in terms of the type of mandate they create and on whom the burden for compliance lies, as well as estimated shorter term implementation costs for the plan. The Planning and Zoning Commission and Steering Committee recommendations contain language which spells out that implementation of policies and timeliness thereof depends on the prioritization of limited resources. (See the definition of Policy on page 16.) Unless there is a conflict with state statute, the use of the terms "shall" versus "should" or their equivalents is a local decision. The existing 1996 plan contains both types of statements, as does the update. There was a strong desire by the Steering Committee throughout the process to utilize the stronger language wherever appropriate to give high credence to the importance of the plan, however they realized as noted above that circumstances can exist, particularly financial resources, which would limit the Town's ability to perform as anticipated. The Council's options include revising all "shall" type statements to appropriate "encourage" or "should" type statements; leaving all "shall" statements as recommended in the draft update; or perhaps changing some but not all of the policies based on a set of criteria. Staff is suggesting that an informed outcome may develop from the analytical process it has outlined below in the section entitled Resolution of Key Issues. Recommended motion: The specific recommended motion is included in the section entitled Resolution of Key Issues, below. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 3 of 12 4. Issue: Method of calculating the allowable number of housing units—"net"versus "gross". This issue was presented in detail in the last special session report and meeting. In summary, using the "gross" approach may encourage dedications and allows clustering to protect open space. Using "net" keeps the densities on any portion of the site to the maximum allowed by the designation. Staff supports the "gross" approach for the following reasons: • It is the approach used in the current Plan and is most common in general plans in Arizona. • Changing to "net" will essentially "down plan" all of the current designations throughout the Plan area. • It only affects residential areas. • The descriptions of the land use designations on page 30 and 31 are controlling factors that limit the types of development (single-family detached, etc.) that would be allowed regardless of the density. • The Significant Resource Area designations (25% of the planning area, shown on the map to designate riparian areas, ironwood areas, archeological sites and other environmentally sensitive lands) limit the densities that the landowner can transfer out of those areas to the lower end of the land use density range (see SRA on page 33). In the above example, the landowner would only get "credit" for one unit per acre (20 units versus 40) for those areas designated as SRA. • Areas that the Town wishes to preserve can not be designated as open space for no "credit" because, per State law, open space areas are required to have a back-up designation of one unit per acre. • Existing policies encourage clustering in the center of the site and discourage increases in densities on the periphery. • Limits to maximum densities can be set by the Council in the amendment or rezoning process. Recommended motion: I move to retain the "gross" approach as presented in the attached Land Use Map Section. However, as directed by Council Staff will, in the Council's draft document, address additional restrictions in policies or the land use designations related to heights, setbacks, etc. S. Issue: Is there another way to address manufactured housing, ensuring the continued recognition of the Highlands development? The staff report of January 21, 2003 suggested an option, based on what staff understood was the desired direction, to allow manufactured housing in the HDR category but only within the existing Highlands development, effectively as an allowable exception. Alternatively, the Council could add manufactured housing to HDR with no reference to Highlands or create a separate land use category to allow the use. Recommended motion: I move to add manufactured housing within HDR only for the existing Highlands subdivision. 6. Issue: Emergency Services should be considered for inclusion in the HDR land use category. The emergency services covered under the Public/Semi-Public land use category is a valid use for consideration in all development related land use categories, including residential, to ensure public TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 4 of 12 safetyuniformlythroughout the Town. Placement in residential land uses should require some g evaluation on a case-by-case basis. Recommended motion: I move to add emergency services to all development related land use categories as an allowable use with appropriate review. 7. Issue: Revise language regarding quantifiable values in the recommended motion on Mixed Use from d oohorNei hbthe January 21, 2003 Council memo to reference including them in an ordinance g rather than just considering them. Per the Council's direction, Staff will include the change in the Council's draft document. Recommended motion: I move revise the policies within Mixed Use Neighborhood from the January 21, 2003 Council memo to reference including quantifiable values in an ordinance rather than just considering them. 8. Issue: Including the Zoning Map in the General Plan. Arizona requires the zoning be in conformance with the General Plan; this is required at the time of rezoning. It is expressly stated in state statute that communities are not required to rezone all property in the Town to conform to the General Plan. There has been concern stated, because of differences between the planned land uses on the General Plan land use map and zoning designations on the zoning map, that perhaps the zoning map should be included in the General Plan document. Zoning is a key implementation tool for the plan, but is not part of the plan. For that and other reasons, no community in the State to the knowledge of the Arizona Department of Commerce has included a zoning map in its general plan. A zoning map placed in the plan would become immediately out of date at the first rezoning, and within a very few months, could not be relied upon by Town residents. For the same reason, Staff does not recommend designating the specific areas on a map where there are differences. Staff has, and continues to, expand the map site on the internet to provide citizens with up-to-date data. We recommend this a better approach to provide this information than the General Plan. Recommended motion: I move to leave the zoning map out of the plan and include the following notice on the Land Use Map and within the text of the Plan: The land use designations on this map are policy recommendations only. The designations may not represent the actual zoning on properties. No decisions regarding land use purchases or future construction should be based solely on these designations. For information regarding the zoning entitlements on a property, refer to the official Zoning Map and the Zoning Code. These are available at www.townoforovalley.com or from the Planning and Zoning Division at 229-4800. 9. Issue: Ensure that Master Plans are prepared for new developments The Commission proposed a new policy to require a master plan for the mixed use neighborhood areas around the La Cholla-Tangerine intersection (Policy 1.4.9; see also Policy 1.4.1). Vice Mayor Johnson suggested that this should be expanded to include other areas. Recommended motion: I move to revise Policy 1.4.9 as shown below and move it to the next section "General Land Use" as Policy 1.5.10. The Town should establish procedures to ensure the coordinated development of large vacant areas, such as the La Cholla-Tangerine intersection, by requiring the development of master TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 5 of 12 plans for those areas. These master plans must consider the impact of development in the area on adjoining, developed properties. 10. Issue: Typographical and substantive corrections uncovered in review of the plan. Staff will make a list of all corrections that may be found through the Council's review of the Update. Examples from last meeting include ensuring each land use category has a density associated with it, changing "Built Environment" to "Community Design" in the element by the same name, ensuring no reference is made in the text to "special resource area" and others. Note: The draft lan presented to the Council on December 11th, did not include all of the text p changes recommended by the Commission for the Land Use Map Section (pp 29-34). These were included in the January 6 packet and should be inserted in the draft plan. This section corrects the reference to "special resource area" and further defines the land use designations. Resolution of Key Issues from the January 21, 2003 Study Session Where appropriate, the above issues are addressed by a specific Staff recommendation. Issues 1-3 above are all or partly addressed with the following staff recommendation. It is intended to accomplish three objectives expressed by the Council members: 1. Reduce the overall volume of the document; 2. Ensure that the policy content is appropriately focused in terms of statutory requirements and practical effectiveness; and 3. Confirm that the goals, policies, and implementation programs of the Plan are consistent with the overall vision articulated in the Plan. To achieve these objectives, staff recommends an analytical process that consists of six tasks as follows: 1. Eliminate Background Discussion: Under this task, the document would be edited to remove the "Background Setting/Existing Conditions" from each of the elements. This will address two concerns raised during the course of review of the document. First it will reduce the amount of narrative, non-policy text in the document, thus contributing to the reduction of the volume. Second, it will eliminate some of the confusion concerning the policy status of the background discussions. That is, the background discussion does not represent Town policy; it is merely descriptive. By removing the background discussion, the General Plan Background Report will become the primary vehicle for the Plan's descriptive content. Recommended motion: I move to direct staff to eliminate the background discussions. 2. Edit Issues Discussions: Under this task, Staff would review and, as appropriate, edit the "Key Policy Issues" discussions in each element. In doing so, Staff will focus on issue statements describing problem issues that merit a policy response, but eliminate any statement that appears to be setting policy. This will accomplish the same objectives as the first task (i.e., reduction of volume and elimination of confusion vis-à-vis policy content). Recommended motion: I move to direct staff to edit the Issues discussions focus on issue statements describing problems that merit a policy response and to eliminate any statement that appears to be setting policy. 3. Eliminate Unsupported/Non-Mandated Policy Content: Several Council members expressed a concern that the Draft Update includes policy content that does not respond to any expressed TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 6 of 12 interests of Town residents. Under this task, staff would review the Draft Plan for content that may fall into this category. In cases where such content does not address any specific content requirements set-out in the State's Growing Smarter/Plus statutes, staff would identify candidate content for deletion. Recommended motion: I move to direct staff to remove unsupported/non-mandated policy content. 4. Remove Policy Conflicts/Redundancy: The Draft Policy Document represents a wide range of policycontent that originates from numerous sources (e.g., the 1996 Plan, the ESLO process, responses to Growing Smarter/Plus mandates). As a result, there is potential for conflicts among p policies originatingfrom different sources. Also, there might be some policies that are repeated in different elements of the Plan, either verbatim or in essence. Under this task, Staff would review the entire Policy Document to determine where such conflicts or redundancy might occur. Based on this review, Staff would make recommendations for reconciling conflicts to the extent possible and eliminating redundancy. Recommended motion: I move to direct staff to remove policy conflicts/redundancy. 5. Evaluate Fiscal Implications of Policies: Staff has already prepared an evaluation of the fiscal implications of the short term actions within the Strategic Implementation Plan for Council consideration. Under this task, Staff would review the policies of the Draft Plan for their fiscal implications, again concentrating on those with short term actions contemplated, and prepare a summary of the findings of this review. Recommended motion: I move to direct staff to evaluate and report on the fiscal impacts of policies. 6. Evaluate Relationship between Town Vision and Values and Plan Policy Content: Several Council members have expressed concern about the relationship between the policy content of the Draft Update and the Town's vision and values presented in the Preamble of the document. Under this task, Staff would review each element of the Draft Plan in light of the vision and values. Based on this review, Staff would prepare a brief element-by-element summary of how the goals andp olicies of the Plan relate to the vision and values. As appropriate, Staff would recommend modifications to the Plan to reconcile inconsistencies between the two. Recommended motion: I move to direct staff to evaluate and report on the relationship between Town vision and values and Plan policies. SCHEDULE FOR THE GENERAL PLAN The table below shows two schedules for submitting the Plan to the voters: one for the September election; one for November. Both schedules are based on receiving clear Council direction no later than March 8 to create a draft of the Plan for public review to be published on March 19. This Plan would be available for review for 28 days prior to the public hearing. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 7 of 12 Primary Election General Election Special Council Meeting February 3 February 3 Special Council Meeting February 6 February 6 Special Council Meeting February 27 February 27 Publish Draft Plan March 19 March 19 Public Hearing April 16 April 16 Final Adoption May 7 May 7 Call for Election May 7 May 7 Final Deadline for Call for Election May 12 July 7 Election September 9 November 4 OVERARCHING PLAN GOALS Staff has been asked to address the overall goals of the draft Update. The draft general plan has a vision statement and a list of five community values. It does not include a section on overall goals; instead, each plan element has an introductory statement summarizing the overall intent of the element in the larger context. As the draft is an update of the existing 1996 plan, the vision and values statements from that plan were reviewed by the Steering Committee, primarily at its meeting of May 13, 2002, for incorporation into the proposed plan. The Committee made a number of changes to these two statements which are summarized below, using the language from the existing adopted plan as a base: VISION To be a town that is recognized as a well-planned community that stfives USES ITS RESOURCES to balance the needs of today against the potential impacts to future generations, while recognizing the limitations of its resources. Oro Valley's lifestyle is defined by the highest standard of environmental integrity, quality education, infrastructure, and services, and public safety. It is a community of people working together to create the Town's future with a government that is responsive to residents;and a government that ensures the long-term financial stability of the Town. VALUES As a Community We Value: Our fragile, quality environment and unique Sonoran Desert setting. Quality education that is AS an integral part of our community. Economic stability that maintains our quality of life. The richness that art, recreation and culture bring to our lives. An efficient local government that protects the Town's long-term interests while being responsive to PRESENT COMMUNITY the needs of the community. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 8 of 12 Values statements were edited primarily on a technical basis, but were moved to the very The Vision and front of the plan and accompaniedby a Preamble on which the Steering Committee worked extensively. For emphasis thesebeen placed on the first page of the Plan immediately after the cover sheet. The Steeringby Committee consensus chose not to add any additional value statements. No changes were recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission. At the beginning of each of twelve of the thirteen elements is a "Statement" which bridges the overall and Values Statements to the goals of the element. The exception to this format is the Vision Environmental Planning Element which contains no separate goals or policies. IMPLEMENTATION OF GENERAL PLAN ONCE ADOPTED has been asked to reiterate how the plan is implemented after adoption. This is primarily covered in Staff the Introduction chapter of the plan beginning on page 9 and is scheduled for discussion on February 27. p Onceadoptsan the Town Council updated plan by a supermajority vote, the updated plan is still not p m implemented until the voters bysimple majority turning out on the date of the election ratify the plan. pp Until ratification, the existing plan is in force. State statute, excerpted from Section 9-461.06L says: "If a majorityof the qualified electors voting on the proposition approves the new plan, it shall become effective as provided by law. If a majority of the qualified electors voting on the proposition fails to approve the new plan, the current plan remains in effect until a new plan is pp approved bythe voters pursuant to this subsection. The governing body shall either resubmit the pp proposed plan, or revise the new plan as provided by this section, for subsequent submission p new to the voters at the next regularly scheduled municipal election or at a special election scheduled at g y least one hundred twenty days s after the governing body readopted the new or revised new plan. All a subsequent adoptions and submissions of the new plan or revised plans must comply with the q p procedures prescribed by this section until the plan is ratified." If thelan is not ratified, Council adoption of the same or a revised plan for resubmittal to the voters is p also by a supermaj ority vote. If thep lan is ratified, it takes immediate effect. Implementation means several things: • The s Strateg iImplementation Plan begins to be implemented by the Town, including adoption or p updating of certain codes. As previously reported, the potential cost of the draft SIP is $800,000 p g over the next two years. • New rezoning cases must be in conformance with the new plan; if not, either a major or minor plan amendment request is required to be submitted for consideration. • The annual budget and CLP updates reflect the new plan during their next adoption cycles. PARKS AND RECREATION ELEMENT (reference pages 81-87) Growing Smarter Acts left the Parks and Recreation Element as an optional element for communities The Gro g . under 50 000 people. There is a slight amount of overlap between it and the State required Open Space p p g Element. The existingGeneral Plan includes a combined element addressing parks, recreation and open space; the proposed plan splits the two subjects out more in line with the revised state statutes. p � p p TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 9 of 12 Three of the five key policy issues were also identified in the 1996 Plan and appear with updated language. These are (1) more and a greater diversity of parks and recreation facilities and activities; (2) recreational amenities such as venues for organized youth sports teams to play; and (3) dedicated funding mechanisms for purchase of land for parks or open space. The two additional policy issues (replacing two from the existing plan that directly addressed open space issues) discuss (4) the need for cooperative school and community recreation programs and (5) difficulties in utilizing neighborhood recreational facilities operated by homeowner associations to serve the growing need of the general public and their need for interconnectivity to the Town's open space and trail systems. The goals and policies of the proposed Plan Update respond to the key policy issues. Policies that respond to the need for more and diverse park and recreation facilities include 8.1.2, obtaining a park site in the La Cholla corridor and 8.3.1 addressing existing park system deficiencies. The issue of lack of recreational amenities is discussed in Policy 8.3.2, ensuring that the right facilities for potential users are constructed and 8.3.3, providing for equal access opportunity including for the disabled. The dedicated funding issue is primarily addressed by Policy 8.1.3, establishing a funding group. Joint use opportunities are addressed by Policy 8.6.1 the integration of neighborhood recreational facilities is addressed in Policies 8.2.4 and 8.2.5. Cost of Parks and Recreation Element Policy Implementation Each policy on pages 86 and 87 of the Parks and Recreation Element has one or more accompanying implementation action items in the Strategic Implementation Plan. In Attachment 1, staff has excerpted the short term action items which implement the Parks and Recreation Element policies, assigning estimated costs to each one. Every policy requires resources to implement although some may be negligible, some expensive, and other longer term items require additional consideration and calculation at the time of the first periodic review of the plan. These costs must be considered when evaluating whether a policy should be included, and if so, whether short term implementation is the most appropriate. Twelve Parks and Recreation Element policies are either all or partially implemented by a short term or annual action item; the remaining 11 items are either ongoing or medium term actions. Note that most action items serve to implement many more than just one policy, so the short term implementation costs of this Element are shared with policies from other elements. This is particularly true for Policy 8.1.1 implemented by an action primarily covering numerous policies in the Open Space Element. Attachment 1 reflects that the short term action items covered under the Parks and Recreation Element are estimated to cost a total of$365,000, broken down as follows: Consultant costs $55,000 Staff costs $40,000 Materials $20,000 Annual staff costs $50,000 Land costs $200,000 $365,000 This does not include the $50,000 estimated annual cost for a grant writer which implements 10 policies in 5 elements. Only one of these policies is in the Parks and Recreation element. COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT (reference pages 37-40) This is an optional element for the Town to include in its plan; it is not required by state statute, however, it is exists in the current plan. As it is design oriented, it logically includes the state required issue of TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 10 of 12 access to incident solar energy from the statutory requirements for land use elements. Nine policies address five key policy issues in addition to the one addressing the required solar issue. All of the key policy issues come directly from the existing plan, virtually if not completely the same text. They address design standards, site planning, landscaping standards, architectural design standards and signage. Similarly, all of the policies are restatements of or clarifying modifications to all the policies in the existing General Plan. Virtually all of the policies are implemented in the Strategic Implementation Plan by one action item reflecting updating the existing design guidelines to ensure that all policies are being addressed fully. The second action item addresses incident solar energy; while not an action in the existing plan, standards for this do exist in the zoning code, and the action item highlights that they need to be continuously enforced. There are no identified short term costs associated with implementing this element of the plan. At the January 21, 2003 special session, council members raised concerns that there was a need to refer to existing documents such as the OVZCR and design guidelines where issues raised in policies had already been addressed. This Element is an example of the discussion that occurs in Issue #1 on page 1 of this staff report. As recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission, there are policies proposed within this element that would require updating of certain guidelines,but the basis for all already exists. HOUSING ELEMENT (reference pages 77-79) The Housing Element is required by state statute but only for communities over 50,000 people. A number of smaller communities choose to address housing issues for a myriad of reasons. Oro Valley has a Housing Element in the existing General Plan. Eleven policies under two goals address two key policy issues: neighborhood quality and the range of housing opportunities. An additional policy addresses the goal of a jobs-to-housing balance in the planning area. The goals and policies are slightly revised from the existing General Plan, but effectively call for the same thing. Three of the strategic implementation actions are carryovers from the current Plan. A fourth action item in the existing plan, enforcement of guidelines to encourage energy conservation, did not implement any of the policies of that plan, was being enforced through the Energy Conservation Code and was not included in the proposed Plan Update. Short term costs of implementation of the Housing Element are estimated at $5000 of staff time to develop and annually update a housing and employment baseline, reporting every two years as to the status for implementation action H-5, which helps to implement five of the Housing Element policies. At its last meeting, some Council members raised concerns about the jobs-housing balance mentioned in Goal 7.3, issues of affordable housing, and providing a range of housing opportunities. There was also a question that Policies 7.2.1 and 7.2.4 are not effective as they designate no areas on the land use map for elderly and special needs. In actuality, the type of land uses contemplated is ideal for the Mixed Use Neighborhood districts. Council also suggested specifying town homes in Policy 7.2.1 as a more common term for attached housing. If the process outlined under "Resolution of Key Issues" above is adopted in whole or in part, it could come to pass that consideration be given to keeping only certain goals and policies from the Housing Element and combining it with another element such as Land Use. As the Town in the future will be required to have a Housing Element, the baseline data in implementation action H-5 (see above) will be critical. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 11 of 12 LAND USE MAP Reference maps for all of the requests were distributed in January 21 packet. Please bring these maps to the meeting. Since then street names have been added to the maps on the web and staff is developing a new set of maps based on Council direction in each of these special sessions. The new maps will show the request, the Steering Committees recommendation, the Commissions recommendation, and the Council's direction. Kelly Ranch (#17) Both the Steering Committee and the Planning and Zoning Commission saw this as an important area for the Town due to its proximity to Catalina State Park. While they were aware of the underlying zoning on the property, they recommended keeping it at a low density and working with other agencies to purchase it as open space. The expected purchase price of this property is $5 million to $6 million. At the December 11`h hearing, presented an alternative to their original request. On January 29, Stephen Renneckar, representing the owners, sent a letter (attached) requesting that the resort area be expanded from approximately 40 acres to 50 acres to meet the Town's R-4R(resort) zoning district requirements. Option County Zoning 1996 Plan Landowner Steering P&Z /Uses (acres) (acres) Request Committee Commission (acres) (acres) (acres) Commercial RVC* (22) Resort (all) NCO (35) None None Uses Resort (42) Resort (42) Residential SR (48) LDR1 (35) 1-acre lot back-up RLDR w/ SRA Uses for open space overlay on all Housing 16 0 40 110 0-35 Units 20 (with SRA) * RVC is Rural Village Center, a low intensity commercial district. Recommended motion: I move to approve the landowners' request to reflect the current zoning, with an SRA overlay throughout to reflect the desire of the Town to preserve it as open space to the greatest extent possible, especially for those areas bordering the park. Note: If the SRA is applied and the Council supports the landowners' request, the LDR1 designation would be changed to LDR2 to allow the development of one unit per acre in the LDR area. State Trust Land (#22) The Steering Committee and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended this area for preservation: to support the County Arizona preserve Initiative Application, create opportunities for a biological corridor between the Catalinas and the Tortolitas, and to provide a buffer to Sun City. Accordingly they recommended application of the SRA overlay throughout the area except for the areas, which are designated as Commerce/Office Park (COP), adjacent to the developed Catalina area. The underlying designations are graduated from least intense to the south and west to most intense to the north and east, the point of primary access, which would require a bridge across Big Wash. Because of the requirement for a one-unit-per acre, back-up designation on Open Space (OS) not supported as OS by the TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 12 of 12 landowner, the Commission recommendation reduces the number of housing units by changing much of the OS to RLDR. This is shown in the table below. Option County Zoning 1996 Plan Landowner Steering P&Z /Uses (acres) (acres) Request Committee Commission (acres) (acres) (acres) Commercial None COP (338) COP (171) COP (171) COP (171) Uses MUN (297) MUN(90) Residential RH (5118) MPC (104) RLDR (2845) RLDR(650) RLDR(2845) Uses OS (4204) MPC (1136) LDR2 (104) LDR1 (650) OS* (673) MUN (297) MPC (679) LDR2 (104) OS* (840) OS (2845) MPC (589) OS* (840) MUN (90) OS* (840) Housing 1200 4400 4600 4600 3000 Units w/ SRA overlay w/ SRA overlay w/ SRA overlay Note MPC is Master Planned Community with an assumed residential density of 2 units per acre and less than 5% commercial. RH is 4.1 units per acre. OS is Open Space which requires a back up designation of 1 unit per acre unless it is supported by the owner. "*" indicates OS supported by the owner. Recommended motion: I move to approve the Commission's land use designations. Catalina Area (#23) The Catalina Council has requested that a portion of the Planning Area be deleted. This is shown as the black area on the Map. In a recent presentation to the Catalina Council they indicated to Staff that areas further to the south should also be removed from the Planning Area. Recommended motion: I move to approve the Catalina Council's request as represented by the areas in black on the land use map. RECOMMENDATIONS: As presented above. 1 7 Attachments: � / f ‘•: 1. Parks and Recreation Element Short-term/Annual Plannin -.n,, Z ing k:mini strator Implementation Tables / .•2. Letter from Stephen Renneckar dated January 29, 2003 /., •• / , / /_nity Devel •nt Director F:\PROJECTS\GP2001\Staff Reports\StudySessionstaffreport#4toTC.doc Town Manage -.F., N C �O a) _N Fes) In p ODM C N Co � I I c O (n CV • 0 OQ :a u) o c . . a) a) pO z , ca z z U w J E E E E E E wW E H H H Cr)H H H 2 Q HCe o t o 0 t 0 un. L L .c L L _c �", U) (/) CO U) W U) N 0 r H o -a U U "O 'D M cu 2 z — — — E— cO - cN Co 0) a '-- (/) N L L Qa. CO CO CD CC ct3 CO CO Ce W 0 .� a a) a) -0 -0 a) U) L =_ C 1 4 �Oc EO > V) O c� cp a c O .5 _c a) U a '� V N U304 U L O N C L O 0 �_0 cn -Q O � cn U d d C L U F— co NO c .>4-E' U V) aU n- N a) E O LU o�O- E -c 0 .0 �-' Q Q O 3 — E . ca) > --a CD a0 a) a) c a) 3 E'v� o o U a� a 'O..., cn E w w c.1 0 •�_ 2 E .� O a) ttl, CD m :. v, -�co a) p '5� o L Z a) � o � � � C) •2 u) O � � a.>, Q H U cn o 6) flflH 1— 03 co ii 2 co z ca w a) U) U c c J _c p ._ C(pO — . . . Ln 0_ CU (Da . c �QO �. f— a)N�w co °'� -I -c0 Ec av) U c) CD . Nao ° cD _ 0). TE c}' per-' .0 O ca cin Oc E Q O� � 0) a-15 .0 ca a) .cC L co cC cv —•C c ca N Z 0_ a•� co c_ O N ci, 0) a pa) CC c a3Z LQcn •5 U) c Q ^ � C CD cal cCC E Lcaa � �� J Lii O CU N ~'_ z r• 7-1 wr-r- -� I''' F-O _ g tqI" LC) . .. . o Q � L dCi '"� O z EF- I 0 0 as `n E a CO Cl)cl H Q, N . 00 o V -LC) co • E czt cc3 0 W 0 •r- c) ti in L `? ' -�-.� = . M 4 t.C) N co E 0 a c 00 00 _ 00 00 >' U 0 «i z i-i cDN 5n an O U V Q r- N N tC) CO- d: c� a r CO '"� M Nom- tC) N o rzt 00,- M o0 r- o0 o0 M E cn N Ui/) c. 0 Ce a) (-NI u < L ,-- I— N CD a- ;--, Q. C ,- IC) ti M Q) N- a) T - . •O z . C a) E ^a) N /1 a) )O C u) _W 'U O Q a) r O a) O) C _O To co W-0 r- 00 A t)--- Cl- .4) C a) E a) 0 a_ 13. E2 0 0 L 0 CD B. C' +�C 2 E 2 a E O O LO O O O 0 s o 'd- LI) N0 M LOu) o Ef} 69, Eft E}} V* 6F} O E r" E d C >, o al 0 .r.; C5. N cd Cl) O 0 caa -t • x V O V A C o ce J al V Z W o .E < ti5 Ci) * E Is Ec, O a) 0 u 0 E u) co -SP- o -r_ E: .0 Q ..J C -d. L''*i- cz n E U oa) C C H 06 CI CO N ra Qcc a E 01/29/03 11:01 v %602 852 5599 SUNCHASE Ij001/001 STERLING PACIFIC MANAGEMENT SERVICES . INC . January 29,2003 'YEA FAMMILE; (520) 7424022 Mr. Bryant Nodine Planning and Zoning Administrator Town of Oro Valley 10,000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley,AZ 85737 Re: Kelly Ranch Property Oracle Road at Tangerine Road Dear Bryant. This letter is to request a slight adjustment to the proposed General Plan designation for the Kelly Ranch. At present it appears that the Mayor and Council will consider a Resort designation for a portion of the property that will match the zoning currently existing in Pima County. While studying the current Oro Valley code for R-4R Resort District I noted that the minimum property size must be 50 acres (Sec. 7-204,A). The area currently zoned in Pima County is 43.8 acres. Therefore,this letter is to request that the area being considered for Resort under the General Plan be expanded on its southern border to include enough additional area too make it 50 acres. This would make it in compliance withthe zoning code and prevent an inconsistency that could lead to issues at a later time. Thank you for your consideration_ Sincerel , SP Stephen E. Renneckar Vice President cc: all council members Chuck Sweet,Town Manager Tobin Sidles,Town Attorney 31:t 10 E, C im lb tck }t cid •Suite 1()() •Phoenix,Arizona 85016 M Phonr (602)468-1090 •Fax(602)468-1292 • ionOro Valleyo General Plan Update 2020 Town Council Special Session February 3, 2003 Ton.ight:'s IF ous • Review of Issues from 1/21/03 Special Session • Schedule heading toward ratification election • Elements — Vision and Values — When and how the plan is implemented — Parks and Recreation Element Policy • Implementation Costs — Community Design Element — Housing Element • Land Use Map — Kelly Ranch — State Trust Land — Catalina Area 1 Issue 1 — Continuing for functions now in code or guidelines • Concern: Appears to be unnecessary, redundant, and does not show progress Town has made • Reasons to include: - Reinforcement-desire to keep issue at forefront • Tend to be more recent issues in public mind -- Education - Plan evolution - Legal tie from major policy document • Not absolutely necessary, but desirable • All adopted documents should be listed in the plan Issue 2 Background material in draftplan . • Concern: Background material is not necessary and adds to bulk - Possible Solution: delete background and refer to background report • Concern: Element and keyissues may inadvertently containp y olic statements — Unintentional; often carry over from existing plan — Solution: Edit document before it comes back to Council 2 issue Use of the term "shall" • Use of "shall" vs. "encouraging" language is a local decision, ua arg ybl with some exception • Commission and Steering Committee recommendation includes modification of definition of y "p olic " relative to fiscal ability ts Pe Sb o ss z�`.c .'� 'r5,h 3 i`'�`r�. o rb.. m a,rs tate m e n gLc, ,. sk y�S xr ' `R�+ sF.�'e f}'r s:, .a.� .,F :+..s< y... ,des is -74,44z— Definition ~ Definition of Polly A specific statement in text or diagram guiding action and implying clear commitment. Typically, each policy statement corresponds to a particular goal and there may be multiple policy statements per goal. Policies are typically presented as active, affirmative statements, beginning with "The Town shall . . . ". Notwithstanding the foregoing, prioritization of limited resources to implement the General Plan may affect the timeliness of implementation of specific policies. 3 Issue 3 Use of term "shall" • use ofx ; ^§, ... ...:��ti,:. A:: �,:..F-� k d�.�, �'•. �3 .: `�u.'�`0.�'�....,vcsg�Z'ti: f:,�,"` c ✓'s 3.`' `', ...3�.:i;' MOIL .''.Vi: -$ .,. ;?.'.:'v,��',; a3 ..t.,N. y...:E.- .. •Z ...,�, y,..„, :x 104,...: .i R `.`$$$ y t S M. Son*-:i e. k- o '�... n $Fa"w. •V 3.c S. ' *:�`. .. .,� ?C. e..,t r @,.2.. .'�' ;a.. s: Uri a r '' onand SLeerul2 Cormiittee recommendation i modification of definition of "polit,:v" relative tt) fisrai • Per staff analysis, some "shall" statements incumbent on Town; some on others, mostly development community emi, 0,4 Av„.?"qo tv''ArelVe" , Resolutionof Issues • Recommendation, in part, for Issue #1 - Recommended motion:For all plan policies fully or partly implemented, I move to change the language to reflect continuation of a policy. • Staff recommendation is a six—part analytical approach to: 9,„)uo- - Reduce volume "---- - Keep policy in policy and make sure it is consistent with statutory requirements and practical effectiveness - Insure that goals, policies and implementation flow from and are consistent with overall vision 4 Six-part. Analytic Process Recommended motions on pages 5-6 of staff report 1. Edit out"Background Setting/Existing Conditions" 2. Review and edit"Key Policy Issues" 3. Review and identify for possible deletion policy not responding to any expressed resident interest or state requirements 4. Recommend reconciliation of conflicting policies if possible and eliminating redundancy 5. Evaluate and summarize fiscal implications of policies 6. For each element, review how goals and policies relate to vision and values;recommend modification if there are inconsistencies. Six-part Analytic Process Recommended motions 1 . Edit out "Background Setting / Existing Conditions" Recommended motion: /move to direct staff to eliminate the background discussion. V)> c49 Vuj yg ;:S':: 5 Six-part Analytic Process Recommended motions 2. Review and edit "Key Policy Issues" Recommended motion: I move to direct staff to edit the issues discussions focus on issue statements describing pro b/ems that merit a policy response and to eliminate any statement that appears to be setting policy. Six-part Analytic Process Recommended motions 3. Review and identify for possible deletion policy not responding to any expressed resident interest or state requirements Recommended motion: I move to direct staff to remove unsupported/ non-mandated policy content. 6 Six-part Analytic Process Recommended motions 4. Recommend reconciliation of conflicting policies if possible and eliminating redundancy Recommended motion: I move to direct staff to remove policy conflicts/ redundancy. #44:77,1t — Six-parte Analytic Process Recommended motions 5. Evaluate and summarize fiscal implications of policies Recommended motion: I move to direct staff to evaluate and report on the fiscal impacts of policies. ,044 7 fix-part Analytic Process Recommended motions 6. For each element, review how goals and policies relate to vision and values; recommend modification if there are inconsistencies. Recommended motion: /move to direct staff to evaluate and report on the relationship between Town vision and values and Plan policies. Issue 4 "Gross" vs. "Net" home density • Issue detailed in last special session and report • Gross density approach encourages dedications and clustering to protect open space • Net density approach allows no movement of density to conserve open space; maximum density is the actual designation on any portion of the site 8 Issue "Gross" vs. "Net" home density • Staff continues to support "gross" density approach as noted in staff report — Affects only residential — Down-planning of Town compared to current plan — No such thing as "no density credit" open space in Arizona — Use of SRA, land use designations, plan policy and zoning process along with "gross" density approach is recommended. • Recommended motion: I move to retain the gross approach. However, as directed by Council, staff will, in the Council's draft document, address additional restrictions in policies or the land use designations related to heights, setbacks, etc. 444-;11t, Issue 5 Manufactured Housing • Concern is continued recognition of the use within the Highlands community • Alternative suggestions described in the staff report • Recommended motion: I move to add manufactured housing within HDR only for the existing Highlands subdivision. 9 Issue 6 Provision of Emergency services • Concern is to include provision in HDR residential category • Actually, a valid use in all land use categories to uniformly cover the predominantly residential community • Residential placement requires case-by-case evaluation • Recommended motion: I move to add emergency services to all development related land use categories as an allowable use with appropriate review. a -- Issue 7 Mixed Use Neighborhood • The record from last study session indicated a desire to revise staff recommendation on putting quantifiable values for ace open space, p public space and residential/commercial mix in an implementing ordinance. - Recommended motion: I move to revise the policies within Mixed Use Neighborhood form the January 21, 2003 Council memo to reference including quantifiable values in an ordinance rather than just continuing them. 10 Issue Zoning. Map inGeneral Plan • Primary concern is to eliminate confusion and provide full information regarding both land uses and hard zoning,where there are differences. • Recommended motion:/move to leave the zoning map out of the plan and include the following notice on the Land Use Map and within the text of the plan: - The land use designations on this map are policy recommendations only. The designations may not represent the actual zoning on properties. No decisions regarding land use purchases or future construction should be based solely on these designations. For information regarding zoning entitlements on a property, refer to the official Zoning Map and at the Zoning Code. These are available at www.townoforovalley.com of from the Planning and Zoning Division at 229-4800. /' , y ��1�'z Issue 9 Master Man s for newevelopment • Commission recommendation required a master plan for mixed use neighborhoods around one intersection based on multiple land ownership. • Issue is expansion of this concept to other appropriate areas. • Recommended motion: I move to revise Policy 1.4.9 as shown below and move it to the next section "General Land Use"as Policy 1.5.10: - The Town should establish procedures to ensure the coordinated development of large vacant areas, such as the La Cholla-Tangerine intersection, by requiring the development of master plans for those areas. These master plans must consider the impact of development in the areas on adjoining, developed properties. 11 Schedule for Plan Adoption Primary Election General Election Special Council Meeting February 3 February 3 Special Council Meeting February 6 February 6 Special Council Meeting February 27 February 27 Publish Draft Plan March 19 March 19 Public Hearing April 16 April 16 Final Adoption May 7 May 7 Call for Election May 7 May 7 Final Deadline for Call for Election May 12 July 7 Election September 9 November 4 Element DPlan Goals • Concern: relationship of individual plan goals and policies to overall goals. • Overall goals really encompassed by the Vision and Values statements • Individual goals should derive from these, Element Statements and state statutes. • Steering Committee reviewed and revised Vision and Values from 1996 Plan — Added preamble and moved to front of plan — Planning Commission made no changes 12 Element Discussion- Overarc in Plan Goals VISION: To be a town that is recognized as a well-planned community that strives USES ITS RESOURCES to balance the needs of today against the potential impacts to future generations, while recognizing the • p limitations of its resources. Oro Valley's unique qualitylifestyle is defined by the highest standard of environmental integrity, quality education, infrastructure and services, and public safety. It is a community of people working together to create the with Town's future with a government that is responsive to residents;,and a government that ensures the long- term financial stability of the Town. Element Discussion- verarchin Plan Goals • VALUES As a Community We Value: • Our fragile, quality environment and unique Sonoran Desert setting. • Quality education that is AS an integral part of our community. • Economic stability that maintains our special quality of life. • The richness that art, recreation and culture bring to our lives. • An Efficient local government that protects the Town's long-term interests while being responsive to PRESENT COMMUNITY the needs of the community. Steering Committee, by consensus, added no new statements. 13 Parks and Recreation Element: • Optional element • Some overlap in statutes with required Open Space Element • The two elements are one in 1996 Plan. • State Statutes: — A recreation element showing a comprehensive system of areas and public sites for recreation, including the following and, if practicable, their locations and proposed development: natural reservations; parks; parkways and scenic drives; beaches; playgrounds and playfields; open space; bicycle routes; other recreation areas. cpu...„;-03,j • V4P'1) .'' f: Parks andRecreation Element • Key Policy IssuesVirtiAijiJ0131)1fr * • first three from existing plan More and greater diversity of facilities and activities kr- Recreational amenities; like youth sports team venues A- Dedicated funding mechanisms for purchase of parks/open space nl` Need for cooperative school/community recreation --- 4°-*>!°*#.; r 3 programs ))/vdjit/ — Relationship of private neighborhood recreation facilities with overall community need and interconnectivity to Town's open space and trails 41/4 14 Park and: Recreation Element • Goals —relationship to statutes and issues — Develop open space system that includes parks — Create linkages, connections between open space system components — Construct and maintain needed, desired parks and recreation facilities — Support access to and cooperative protection for adjacent large natural resource areas — Create a varied recreational trails system that can also provide alternative transportation modes 3 - Developing and operating joint use recreational facilities `'�y i Parks and Recreation Element • Costs of Implementation (Short term policies) 1v_ :1- — Consultant costs 55,000 <6 a " — Staff costs 40,000 1' (14/4 — Materials 20,000 0 — Annual Staff Costs 50,000 — Land Costs 200,000 — TOTAL $365,000 10- (A'4121 • Note: implements more than just Parks and Recreation �� p Element; does not include a portion of grant writer time 1 called for in policies „,,...,._ 15 Cornrnu Community Design Element • Optional element- no state statute (except solar) • Carried over from 1996 Plan • Key Policy issues — Overall Design Standards — Site Planning — Landscaping Standards — Architectural Design Standards — Signage • Goals — Aesthetically pleasing, naturally compatible built environment — Ensure access to and control of incident solar energy • Relates back to Issue #1 discussion-and need for updating Housing E . • Optional element for the Town, but included in 1996 Plan — significant carryover • State statutes exist but apply to communities over 50,000 people - Existing and forecasted housing needs - Housing quality,variety and affordability - Equal provision of housing • Discussed significantly at last special session - Jobs-housing balance - Affordable housing - Providing a range of housing opportunities - Locations for elderly and special needs 16 Housing Element. • Proposed element has short term costs of $5000 for data development • Six-Part Process would likely play a role in what happens with this element • Options: — Make modifications as discussed — Consider keeping only certain aspects and combining with another element such as Land Use • Keep housing and employment baseline data development • leg Implications for third of sustainability stool P 4i5N Kelly Ranch Current Landowner Steering P&Z Zoning Request Committee Commission Housing 16 20-40 0-110 0-35 Units Fiscal $9 m $9 m $0 to $-6 m $0 to $-6 m Impact http://www.townoforovalley.com/ • 17 State Land Current Landowner Steering P&Z Zoning Request Committee Commission Housing 1200 4600 4600 3000 Units Fiscal minimal $50 m $11 m $25 m Impact http://www.townoforovalley.com/ "%,N, - Catalina Area. This is a request from the Catalina Council to delete areas on the west side of Oracle Road from the Planning Area http://www.townoforovalley.com/ is' r 18 .:,„„,„:105,-- • 2.001 General Plan Upda te END 19 Sweet, Charles From: Vicki Salentine [vbalenti@amphi.com] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 11:58 AM To: pabbott©orovalley.net; ploomis@orovalley.net; wwolff@orovalley.net; brochman©orovalley.net; rjohnson cLDorovalley.net Cc: Patrick Nelson; Todd Jaeger; csweet@orovalley.net Subject: General Plan Update Study Session Dear Council Members, I called the Mayor on Friday and was informed that the General Plan Update Study Session related to schools had been moved from Thursday, February the 6th, to today, February 3rd. Although I was never informed of the February 6th meeting, I have to assume that were it not for my call, I would not have been informed of this change to today. That fact is a true disappointment and negatively reflects on the status of our working relationship. I understand that the suggested language in the draft from the General Plan Update Steering Committee supporting schools is in question. In my efforts to determine if there is a problem with the language, I have identified one general plan from Peoria, Arizona that addresses some of the Amphi concerns and may provide the Council with language that works for your legal advisors. Listed below is the language used in the Peoria, Arizona General Plan related to schools. I understand that policies related to shared use of facilities, bike paths, etc., are not of concern. As a result, I have only attached the policies that seem to be of concern to the town. Policy J-la: The City shall continue to foster open lines of communication with the respective school districts through the exchange of annual reports and mutual review of development proposals. Policy J-1 b: The City shall request that developers of residential projects meet with the respective school district and that the district provide the City with projected enrollment and timing impacts such that this information can be included in Planning Commission and City Council staff reports. Policy J-1 c: The City shall prepare and adopt allowances guidelines for the dedication of future school sites that meet district criteria and timing issues. Policy J-2b: The City shall encourage schools to be located within the neighborhood they intend to serve and utilize enrollment boundaries that remain relatively constant over time. To document this language, you may check their site @ www.peoriaaz.com/index1 .htm scroll down on the "What's New" column to the next to the last item. - City of Peoria General Plan: Adopted 5/15/01 The adoption of similar language by Oro Valley is critical for Amphitheater. Sincerely, Vicki Balentine Superintendent Amphitheater Public Schools This E-mail has been scanned by McAfee WebShield and is delivered to you virus free. Infected attachments associated with this E-mail have either been deleted or cleaned. --Town of Oro Valley Information Systems Division 2 >' N N 0 O a) to LC) O u) c?) .Q C N0 -O .Q F- LO d- a) r- 0, C N C) C� V UW E � O ° co c a) a) o O z u) z E E E E E E W L LiJ 2 a) H F- F- F- F- 2 <( F- I e OO ° ° o 0 �.•.. (!) U) U) (i) (J) Cl) N 0 r J U C O aVj C C M Q CO CC � C) Q `QC) CV 4 z co c ot5 cm c o2S 'cm E E cn r 2 00 c�° CO CO a) LLI a Lco co cu c017) Q w n a a a a a Ce cz �... ce a) a) -o -o a) (/) L .cC a) E V) c O vi +-' N c0 > ° O O C(/ L,- - o-0) a� ca. Q . ocv a)a) a) � U-0 c 1-7 L L - _c C W COQ cn•a a) ca I— Q � 22 cn oQ UO _C = Q Ca) L _ o Q• a) ( 0 ca a) Ci) a) UO 0- a) W -c L o E .• o I a) �cn o C) c a) a) Q. C F- � a� > a) a) ° - J _O „,-(5 C N CD CD 5 5 V) C F- a) C - Wo W = Op CO 2C 5 •� ° a) J CT a) ca t CO a) '''+ co C ° 0 C3) -0 O-g CO C1 +_ O O C v) t A Q Q U)-0 _(n U- D_ CU C6 p o Z a) 3 ° ° v a)N N V) Z OL C o CO C 5 cn > .. 0 a) a) Q_>, Q I- (O = o Ccy)O L " U) C (n a) Q C CO �• N �'' O Q COU >� O COQ -o c H 2 m °— c0 F- c0 U O W a) � C Ji-' = -0 ci (Oo C �O = c 2 oo� 0 ca Q Q ca ca F }, CD a) + a J � ° -c0 ~ E 2 0c�0c7a U o CL a o O °_ � . ca co 0)..h= N Oco .c= C �'cn—�, O _o c0 "'I N Q.U a c a) � c Q +-+ i Cc (O CO (O L �"� 0 � ° C % C: � pN � cZ a) () n (d -F-- L U •>U) 12CC C L Q� O Z 2-2 Vv�) += O �' Li) CO J Q c0 _ c0 c 00 c0 cn iii C) C) CU N ch tL kA z W cA 0 O t1 �C) H O 00 L C4 i- Q z E �▪N 2 O 0 a) Lri "' E a CO up ,-c P a W — N 5 �• Ce N ▪4 up up00 r- 0 CD M O c� V — . ti Lc? c0 ii p r- 00 000 a0 c, -i-,,,,e .5 o a " CO- N •50 on CNI LO cri 06 r- a0 00 ,- 0a a0 00 E o N i. ct a. 2 ,--- in r--. t 4,),-, Eo 0.. a. a a a ra.`1, com U) a Z ui C a) EN ^_W, W ^L W )O c ^� W "U O L_ 4) O 0) 0) C _O CO E-+ CO W.1 00 A 0 0 0 C 4) E a) O Q. 11 EN •- V) O .. V L.: d) c }, .2 'L. 11: d }, E C o 2 E O O O O O O O 0) E 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 T O O LC) 0 0 LCA O O o o d" LO LC) N O co IC)v o� O 69- Et €'3 (J 6l* Et E E E o >' w c, O v d Q c E c, 1 a) a 0 0 co 't .2 o ,.� U Z W E•.., J o a F- N j O a) _ 2 0 U O E (/) (3 F E � E (13 D •L Q _ O E v,N .+7, o Z C C O ca CO O " Qcv c O < 0 2 _11-- 0 ,, Ce ) b 0