The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPackets - Council Packets (1277) AGENDA ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION APRIL 02, 2003 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11,000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS —TOWN MANAGER The Mayor and Council may consider and/or take action on the items listed below: ORDER OF BUSINESS: MAYOR WILL REVIEW THE ORDER OF THE MEETING CALL TO AUDIENCE —According to the Arizona Open Meeting Law, the Town Council may only discuss matters listed on the Town Council Agenda. Matters brought up by the public under "Call to Audience"cannot be discussed by the Town Council as they have not been placed on the agenda. Any items must be addressed to the whole Council, not a specific member. In order to speak during "Call to Audience'; please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. 1. CONSENT AGENDA (Consideration and/or possible action) A. Minutes — 03/19/03 B. Resolution No. (R)03-24 Acceptance of bid and award of contract to N.A.C. Construction in the amount of$135,460.00 for the Mutterer Wash Channel Improvement (Project No. OV 30 00/01 22) C. Resolution No. (R)03-25 Approval of a contract between the Town of Oro Valley and Territorial Sign Company to renew the Town Kiosk Sign Program D. Resolution No. (R)03-26 Adoption of Policy# 10, supplementing the town Council Policies in reference to the Town Council, Advisory Boards and Commission Members Site Tours Policy 2. ACCEPTANCE OF THE ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT DATED APRIL 2003 3. APPOINTMENT OF MEMBER TO THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION WITH TERM TO EXPIRE ON JUNE 30, 2004 4. ELECTION OF VICE MAYOR WITH TERM EFFECTIVE APRIL 2003 TO DECEMBER 31, 2003 COUNCIL REPORTS TOWN MANAGER'S REPORT DEPARTMENT HEAD REPORTS CALL TO AUDIENCE—According to the Arizona Open Meeting Law, the Town Council may only discuss matters listed on the Town Council Agenda. Matters upby brought the public under "Call to Audience"cannot be discussed by the Town g Council, as they have not been placed on the agenda. Any items must be addressed to the whole Council, not a specific member. In order to speak during "Call to Audience'; p lease specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. ADJOURNMENT POSTED: 03/26/03 4:30 p.m. lh A packet of agenda materials as listed above is available for public inspection at least 24 hours prior to the Council meeting in the office of the Town Clerk between the hours of 8:00 a.m. — 5:00p.m. The Town of Oro Valley complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If any person with a disability needs any type of accommodation, please notify Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk, at 229-4700. INSTRUCTIONS TO SPEAKERS Members of the public have the right to speak during any posted public hearing. However, those items not listed as a public hearing are for consideration and action by the Town Council during the course of their business meeting. Members of the public may be allowed to speak on these topics at the discretion of the Chair. Ifou wish to address the Town Council on any item(s) on this agenda, please complete a Y speaker card located on the Agenda table at the back of the room and give it to the Town Clerk. Please indicate on the speaker card which item number and topic you wish to speak on, or if you wish to speak during "Call to Audience", please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. Please step forward to the podium when the Mayor announces the item(s) on the agenda which you are interested in addressing. 1. Please state your name and address for the record. 2. Speak only on the issue currently being discussed by Council. Please organize your speech, you will only be allowed to address the Council once regarding the topic being discussed. 3. Please limit your comments to 3 minutes. 4. During "Call to Audience" you may address the Council on any issue you wish. 5. Any member of the public speaking must speak in a courteous and respectful manner to those present. Thank you for your cooperation. A MINUTES ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION MARCH 19, 2003 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11,000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER6.00 p.m. ROLL CALL /01/ PRESENT: Paul Loomis, Mayor AZ1*,,, yrr. Paula Abbott, Council Mem 4r Bart Rochman, Council i` 00 ber Werner Wolff Counc'.Pr` `-Inber At/ �, y/fj; i • Dick Johnson, Vice EXCUSED Nr* EXECUTIVE SESSION AT OR AFT •00 PM ? '" : :/ faiVi**A 1,/j%JF�Jf',::; '':SJ F•%f..¢,' Jri+'i":v. • madeb �� . and SECONDED MOTION: A MOTION was :,,,,,-4,40,,ochman by Council Member Abbott to go into Execu / : ` on v4:01 p.m. for the following purpose: /ry,h , "S; 1. Pursuant to ARS § 3 ,4P1 ' ual Performance Review of the Town Magistrate Aly"` 2. Pursuant to ARS .' Y:: 4y4. •y.rk f'Le al Advice regarding Class Action • Lawsuit a• s t Naf � '.. enturyFinancial Advisors brought by the Arizona State T 1x �41`. Mayor Lo `"`: ' •;announces 4.r ° t Judgee George Dunscomb and Human Resources Director y �.3 �:;. : �f�Y,. g Jeff Grant wdig :c prese 4` Executive Session for Item #1 and Budget Analyst Imelda `' Item#2• gefiPAngelo would b��• Motion carried, 4—O. MOTION: A MOTION was made by Council Member Wolff and SECONDED by Council Member Abbott to go out of Executive Session at 7:10 p.m. Motion carried, 4— 0. RESUME REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER 7:20 p.m. a 03/19/03 Agenda,Council Regular Session 2 ROLL CALL PRESENT: Paul Loomis, Mayor Paula Abbott, Council Member Bart Rochman, Council Member Werner Wolff, Council Member EXCUSED: Dick Johnson, Vice Mayor PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Loomis led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. UPCOMING MEETIN ANNOUNCEMENTS J4PP ,4,1011P,',, Town Manager Chuck Sweet reviewed the upcoming meet,, y. /{ , fr:v 4, 'lap . Public Information Officer Bob Kovitz introduced tk °"``e~students from 1 `:g* iversity of Arizona College of Public Administration who w ` atte . .• nce at tone is meeting: g � Y f/f.f.i`.. Yanfang Lu, Peter Saree, and Jason Baran s,!" f1Yf/1 l./r// �f r/s%ir CALL TO AUDIENCE .74", ''.%y',,: ./,1J��'/%G i..., 'YF��'f!/.,f,.' 9•:f i ;. .race"�'"°` � `�+ ��tie Oro ValleyBuilding Don Chatfield, 11299 N. Placita AlamedYi �s :.; :.{... •';_g}` 11s7osler, for their work and Safet De artment Phil O'Connor, Mike m:`,=. ,.,••: "~� °'�� • wined that the De artment has been assistance on a spa addition t me• --f: .. p '". ��' f::. .O''''tifk with : :`:.%; noted in the past as being :4:0..,::,.� r,..,,%,. that permitting was too expensive. He stated that he found the; .:k ., ent ,,as very helpful. In addition, they saved .fi fj3'•j'Vii: i %' ��/,'.0. • ��`% •�.k.."�� ''°��"�`��'� � ous situation re ardin the installation of an ::: .: g ghim from a potentiall c ::��.�� :.�� ry��:� ��:�.:"�` �� field stated that the Town owes the BuildingSafety electrical line to hi a• 1\7186%'` Department its s e s-t -:he job that they do for their citizens. /AO' 'tel.::; � IllyingBird Drive, questioned the ro ress of resolving the Alan Dan , 11515 progress `:.w•:: Avenue and Palisades as expressed bycitizens. He stated �� traffic safety ;��:�'ns at F;� p that the installat"',H f.,.�:;. :. :.:Y.� lightonly �%f alJ�y�• �::�� to dawn" street would be useful to see"the crash scenes" at that inti 'fi''... . Mr. Dankwerth further commented that the problems can not '-'nue project i s completed and asked that Council act now wait until the First A nue widening p � before there is another fatality at the intersection. CONSENT AGENDA At the request of Council Member Abbott, Mayor Loomis pulled Item I from the Consent Agenda. MOTION: Council Member Rochman MOVED to APPROVE the Consent Agenda with the exception of Item I. Council Member Wolff SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 4— O. 03/19/03 Agenda,Council Regular Session 3 A. Minutes—2-24-03; 2-27-03; 3-5-03; 3-6-03; 3-10-03 B. Building Safety Activity Report—February 2003 C. Coyote Run Activity Report—February 2003 D. Library Activity Report—February 2003 E. Police Report—February 2003 F. Resolution No. (R)03-20 Authorizing the execution of an Intergovernmental Agreement regarding permitting and operating managed in-channel recharge of effluent in the Santa Cruz River Channel G. Resolution No. (R)03-21 Authorizing a contract between the Town of Oro Valley and WAPA (Western Area Power Administration) for the design to modify some of the existing power polNo. OV es within the LJ. ;r ada widening: Calle Concordia to Lambert Lane Project , � I00 25 � r�� H• Resolution No• ( R)03-22 Authorizingand A �h��R�a contract with pp;, ,,,,�s�,:�� . Malcolm Pirnie in the amount of $210,000 f•` !!fe-4,:,•!,`" � engineering Road Interconnect "F"Z /'. ./ ;f%.. design for Moore ,7, • . I• Resolution No. (R)03-23 Approval of.. ' 7ergovernment.`. eement ' �� `?•�•"�hool Dist�r ct for Project between the Town of Oro Valle and, "f{Am �:' { .. Y �� r!. p.! No. OV 30 02/03 02 Pedestrian Path ,.v:"µ ad: La Cholla Road to Wilson K-8 School (PULLED FOR D :�SION) RESOLUTION N O. R 03-23 APPiti4,-y• AN "'ERGOVERNMENTAL I. RES O ( ) .! ��:{ {.: rye{v AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TOW ,.` O '�:.:. f": ::. :LLEY AND THE AMPHI FOR PROJECT41' ,,41:...;., {: x30 02/03 02, PEDESTRIAN PATH SCHOOL DISTRICT ,:...,. �,.,, — GLOVER ROAD: LAC ` ` 7` '",n._: WILSON K 8 SCHOOL • :. :. :::-f,� ROA - Yked En i {+`"'"r Bill Jansen and Civil En ineer III Paul Council Member Abbo •�. ,:fi ...:;..N,g g :!Nebo. "!'n�br� b �;abol Nzomo for their work w" � t .r.. • Di•strict and concerned parents on the pedestrian/bike pat h.fpr the F;::; 'ants atten s ing Wilson School. MOTION: cil br Ab` 'tt MOVED to APPROVE Resolution No• (R)03-23• Y 4,04 CouncilC12 ;F`" ;:r Wolff S &1NDED the motion. Motion carried, 4—0. • 2. PRESE 'I�� OF PLAQUE OF APPRECIATION TO ANDREW ! h .._. ;Y; MASTERMAN F" `S SERVICE ON THE BUDGET AND BOND COMMITTEE Mayor Loomis presented a plaque of appreciation to Andrew Masterman for his volunteer service on the Budget and Bond Committee from July 2001 -January 2003. 03/19/03 Agenda,Council Regular Session 4 3 PRESENTATION BY AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY REGARDING THE FIRST ANNUAL "NORTHWEST RELAY FOR LIFE" EVENT TO BE HELD AT IRONWOOD RIDGE HIGH SCHOOL, JUNE 6—7, 2003 Public Information Office Bob Kovitz introduced Candace Thrush and Sam Colwell- Chanthaphonh from the American Cancer Society. Ms. Thrush, Community Development Director of the American Cancer Society showed a video tape presentation regarding the American Cancer Society's "Relay for Life." She explained that the first annual "Northwest Relay for Life" event will be held in Oro Valley at the Ironwood Ridge High School on June 6 —7, 2003. She explained that there area approximately relay events across the country. Ms. Th kY${=: rther reported that pp y 3,300 �sy �;::: the monies raised from the events are committed to cancer rese.v� .�: She asked for the f,r. Town's support of the event. tOr Ms• Colwell-Chanthaphonh presented packets of info* on to the Yt4f ¢ Council. ? yv 4• PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE N�. )03 7 ,-ADOPTI I OF AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 607.1 OF THt4/ i�� ,f::�! ` 'ION OF THE •'f{riY INTERNATIONAL PLUMBING CODE to*,„Community Develo ment Director Bre��: Tcportes � the proposed amendment to the Plumbing Code would add language r Sec ion1 9 1 that would require that hot �.%�J�ri�/``..,•' Ff4f.,.,.:,.H:r ''/ ` ngsr khat have plumbing fixtures for water be provided in all tenant spaces of s -� �1� � . ��-�i;�:;`•: ��f.'Y. �°'�� this change would require that the -: :r...��Y: ..:Y� - g q :: plaind, bathing and washing purpose..' t.�::.:.` �_ . ? `�� ''�yq:.�'"y�:;'•.•f.f f:• A'r�f ff.:.. ��''�'r?J�`�'X4��/yt�',,'.:!��',,�� 'f:�Y�:qhs:: developer install the facili 'rr ::. f insteafoi0000'oo..'oo....o.. the tenants having to retrofit the building. He stated tha : ``woul';r .'more *effective if installed when the building s�.YY.,.: . y/ter,;.:j<.;.:E��r:F.;3v.-�4(f/,:�Y:...��jjjY,: ��:.:;' /f f.'f.•'ffrrr�''.:'4.•r !•"Y'1 rp{'fr , T.:.r/.{JA Yi {y/vf•r'l f•�i�i shell is being built. F Y ,,;`` �x s••r:�. ..�CY; f1. /,�.,, f?J !�:/'r.p�,firj.(,X:' :N�%., S••,.,i. fol w: �..` : " ::din •: : .bilit of installation of water heaters (master heater Discussion1�, �: `�� y ,?,�fi:tJ.a,,.i.y b '' f.::.. r f....�,;,'r.>�•qr,rr...Y .ifi:c:l::rJcF!f/�' �!/J:,. {rh. or individua :he ters *lingc:n- •iuilder want Code to be explicit so can be prepared ; � � p �.'�i ref>{�•. ) '. ^;_: "`;": . locally, antMendment i ,: re business friendly. • !iii:.IF:� {1�:_. �:r:�1'f� Ma or Loomis ��: :.., public hearing. There being no speakers, the public hearing •rf' was closed. ' ' MOTION: Council Member Abbott MOVED to APPROVE Ordinance (0)03-08, adoption of amendments to Section 607.1 of the 2000 Edition of the International Plumbing Code attached as Exhibit "A." Exhibit (A) §P607.1 Where required. In occupied ALL structures, hot water shall be supplied to all plumbing fixtures and equipment utilized for bathing, washing, culinary purposes, cleansing, laundry or building maintenance. Tempered water shall be delivered from accessible hand-washing facilities. 03/19/03 Agenda,Council Regular Session 5 Council Member Wolff SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 4— 0. 5. OV12-02-21 REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 5 PARCEL N SUBDIVISION, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD, APPROXIMATELY ONE-HALF MILE SOUTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF NORTH RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD AND WEST MOORE ROAD, (PARCEL #21953004Y) Community Development ment Director Brent Sinclair reviewed an overhead presentation depicting the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development (PAD) and explained that the p g , :. applicant is requesting approval of a 28 single family home subdiv ,, on 10.77 acres. pp f,,. q �r Theparcel is located on the east side of Rancho Vistoso Boulev •lust south of Moore r r that approximately 6.1 acres of the prop, r, -'oned Rancho Road. He explained pp y ��•�F.:,,�;Nf, "�•:. Vistoso PAD High Density Residential and the remainder � . '� � iJ - ,�.;.Ope Open Space.S ."; %, Mr. Sinclair reviewed the open space on the plat and ex, =+,coned therelo:, ility easement e n t fN ,y;, and path that has been previously graded. He revie .�. e applicant's 6Y ; , sal for an g,-/,',", � open space trade to create"meaningful open s ac-aich• .ld include .7 acres as a easement. He also explained that tho--: :•:`-ie� .. `is providing an in-lieu fee conservationp �Avgi,,,,? � �for a trail #331 and dedication of appropriate ease '''‘"4.,r-0/,,, Atii-A.,::... .:.A:: are Further discussion followed regarding: "••ri ding o P ; `power lines, streets i�fi> f% fish+��/%r �iown '''. J��i}fj,4i. � .��fj" �,:T,t";F:�;:ii:•�°� �• `•� ', ,ry � s streets, and possibly but theymust still meet th� e ::: 'l'..Y private streets rf.;� �. �� f r" providing meandering sidewalks verses a i•� ';,:3 ses Ganite path for the trail. AViits,s *,;4//Y7of -1rf /� r Steve Oliverio, The WLB tt.T4e, ••:•�:• p �:.. �senti applicant, Stellar Homes, exp acned :�,rte" ��7�� Vis" that the trail in betwee Tandsc � d., reas the"hammer head"turnarounds could ¢,�4��:%"M,i•"/.•:. ,..:::'•i��ii��t��'�; ^'{{:r'.{Y,�F/f�<'r:� yrr/Si�. ability fc "" is •" •.r•., "Jude would be difficult. He also explained meander but the ab y �....` ..��: ��'�" �p�"•'��"f��'• � granite (DG). He stated that that most of the tra 'n R ..c � % istoso are decomposed �r ��:i `t , t.f, ea to the north and the DG would lend itselfbetter to theyare t in :;:,::�.: : :::. .:�:�� . .:�:� bufferingth�:Oncretenr;.statat they could adjust the easements to accommodate f�rr the meand"��,::y"' F�itrail betw /.rthe hammer heads. He also explained that the landscape plan would b'-'27,14, itted fi the Final Plat. 4, -4,,,•4 {" f%' n MOVED to APPROVE OV 12-02-21, MOTION: Counc��t��: :fiber Roc ma Preliminary Plat for Ancho Vistoso Neighborhood 5 Parcel N, effective on the date of satisfaction of the conditions listed in Exhibit "A." Exhibit (A) 1. Add a General Note that states: "Homes located on lots 25 —28 shall include fire sprinklers that are approved by the Fire Marshall." 2. Details shall bep rovided to demonstrate how the front portions of lots 25 —28 will o drain per OVZCR Section 15-302.A.3, while maintaining 1% slope in earthen areas. 3. Extend the sewer line and relocate manhole adjacent to lot 28 north to Common Area «A.99 4. These conditions must be satisfied prior to staff certification of the Preliminary Plat. 03/19/03 Agenda,Council Regular Session 6 5. The open space trade conditions listed in note 36 shall carry over to the Final Plat. p Item 1 shall be restated as: "Dedication of a 15 foot wide non-motorized public recreational easement along the northern limits of the property shall be completed before a building permit is issued." Council Member Wolff SECONDED the motion. DISCUSSION: Planning and Zoning Administrator Bryant Nodine explained that the recommendation of decomposed granite was consistent with the WAPA line trail and other trail connections in the area. AMENDMENT TO THE MOTION: At the request of Council*0 ber Abbott, Council Member Rochman and Council Member Wolff agreed . .44} • the meandering trail as discussed (between hammer head turn turnarounds)u. tomposed granite. ,40:e .C: 6rfjd•iw. MOTION AS AMENDED, carried, 4— 0. 'F' J Mayor Loomis recessed the meetingat 8:03 p.m. ' :mee ��-:::resumed a '8:12 p.m. r 1.1f/i. fC f. r.... } 6. OV12 02 04 REQUEST FOR APPROVA ` PRA PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 10CELS X, Y, AND V, titti*,,Q,j,,,,LOC*ED MOORE NORTH OF 1`:N O W N AS PU LT E AT RANCHO ,e f �' � O OU 1DARY AND THE GOLF ROAD IN BETWEEN THE WESTER�J,��f: H�y ;, , A.��}: COURSE AT VISTOSO (PARCEL #2t1:‘', :„ f;..r......r f f f�•yr; Planningand ZoningAdm " rat•• , lyant Tone reviewed a location map depicting d a: l ,'and V. He explained that the Pulte Rancho Vistoso Neighb4 �od 10,��>�• e s X,�� :f�. '�: �'.�:.:�;:}.-�.::}.�::}�.:�. i��....:.�v:- a 48 acre • �rdivision in Rancho Vistoso on Home Corporation i s req`��,�?v .. :: 4,4,751:=��'�s:. ..•�:��:: �, parcel. The land u ,e:Y.esi ri� 4 : s medium density residential (3 to 6 units per acre) for q .f��:�'�;';:'' s�<:a:.:. ��?�".,•�Fr�. to 8 unitsper acre) for Parcel X. Parcels Y and .:u•: :; m hig :density residential (6 .GJ/ r /i,Ve Mr. NodinzCvgained that•.' uncil approved the Planned Area Development (PAD) n.,`,h7JJf #. Fr4(f'ii amendmentsa:•F 2002' .rf.�t allowed a reduction of front yard setbacks for side entry garages '4406*and for h •. designated open space. He stated that the design guidelines for the reduction o {: a} "�and setbacks have been included in the preliminary plat for this � project. Mr. Nodine sated that the requirements for open space trade have also been p J incorporated in this project and a recreation concept plan has been submitted. Mr. Nodine reported that the Preliminary Plat meets all requirements of the Rancho Vistoso PAD, the Zoning Code Revised including the Design Guidelines, Golf Course Overlay Zone, Buffer Yard requirements and the Riparian Habitat Protection Overlay District (actually provides for additional open space.) Mr. Nodine further explained that although the plat provides for lesser density than originally planned in the PAD, the Amphitheater School District objects to the plat as the enrollment generated by the proposed project would exceed the capacity of the elementary schools in the area. i i 03/19/03 Agenda,Council Regular Session 7 Mr. Nodine explained that traffic would also be an issue in the area due to the fact that major collector roads have been completed only to the extent of the subdivisions boundaries in the area. Staff is recommending that some of the major collector roads be completed before any certification of occupancy can be approved for any lots (includes completion of portions of Pebble Creek Drive, La Canada Drive, Moore Road and Desert p ) Drive. Fairways He explained that the recommended Conditions of Approval include this recommendation along with recommendations for access to the site by construction traffic. Mr.Nodine then reviewed the Recreation Concept Plan and explained that the PAD requires 1.8 acres of recreation; however, the applicant is providing 2.4 acres. He stated that the recreation areas are distributed through out the site. (Mr. (41,ine reviewed a map depicting the sites.) He explained that four of the sites are shall �'�;:z/_`d are on major p ,f .�. '/ `` vide more depth, add roadways, so staff is recommending that more area be create•,, f „ /.:i. walls, etc. for safetyreasons. He explained that the recreat/., are::=t ; fuld be connected with trails. Also, per the Rancho Vistoso PAD, a pedes ; n trail ha : "' :�•lanned along f fes. the property which loops arou ✓Ir. Nodine sta ,at the the western border of p p y ��v ,�.; �r'' n�`�� li ��•�`�•`�.:: there wil ��e a total trail required trail and the additional trails provided b �, .; pp ,, the re0 t 4 r ef•f the PAD. ltit length of 12,200 linear feet which is double �,, ;.,� , A;;:• Mr. Nodine reported that the Developmpt4gyiew Boa d RB)recommended approval of the plat with concerns expressed rega lifi, i:. e and `c tion of the recreation areas due to safety. Staff also recommends a t '-Xi`; i,:: ith conditions. f' oi: Viz:.,. f'•/,'� f; r .,:��•::.�: .,:�}:• fin staff and Robert Tucker, MMLA, repr--' � /gthe apnt, Vistoso Partners, stated that 1.::ii%•i:� ��J..�1 f • the DRB have recommen/4,-:: :I e ctAmmatio „.. : :some of the smaller recreation areas into- ,/ He stated that Vistoso Partners is the larger areas (AreasJ'&'3y: �`mov " ��t .t•:,,Area�� rry�v:.Y::./�•�: :•''f.��:•�'.,.4��;:•jr;`'f:.i•:,, •.';.�'I that there would be agreeable to the combing •:: s N � . areas. He explained g � r:.: f walls to separate th:-.,_,ecrea ::teas from the roadways. f/F: k. _ r '-'141.<4* AA/ Mayor Loo, ; pened t 1 - oor i' blic comment. yam:; '''10$4, mac<z::; 4.,:. The followin;, ®le expressed concerns regarding the excess construction traffic on Copper Spring Trrro r/,r,:ls project, safety concerns, quality of life, possible remedies ,r ,for increased traffsurrounding roads are open, and the possible closure of Copper Spring Trail at Moore$'oad. Albert Lambson, 985 W. Silver Spring Place Don Bristow, 12190 N. Copper Spring Trail George Cates, 12270 N. Copper Spring Trail Sharon Brown 960 W. Silver Spring Place Discussion followed regarding the following: • Copper Spring Trail is a public street, can not restrict traffic or close street. Can enforce the Truck Route Ordinance. • Work with developer on diverting construction traffic down Moore Road, 03/19/03 Agenda,Council Regular Session 8 • Conditions asro osed by staff address construction traffic access and access p p restrictions (Moore Road, La Cholla Boulevard, Desert Fairways Drive, Pebble Creek Drive, Vistoso Highlands Drive and Rancho Vistoso Boulevard) • Right-in/Right-out "pork chop" at Moore Road and Copper Spring Trail is in g g designprocess and should go out for bidding process in 45 days. Hopefully will g help remedy some of the traffic problems. • Recommended change to Condition #13 by changing "certification of occupancy" to "building permits." • Concerns expressed with placing parks on La Canada Drive. • To address concerns ofp arks, Lot 25 will be turned into the park which would allow a depth of 200 feet. This would allow the creation of a buffer for safety. • Buffer with walls would provide adequate safety. • Park #4 would provide appropriate area for off-trail amc e, 47; • Recreation area adjustments would come back with F:' : . e t. If must continue plat to resolve issues, would take abou4r-o f•et back to preliminary � • Council. ety • Recreation areas do not meet General Plan s `` rds that the To'p=. , .hoping to ,fry achieve when looking at large developme e ; fJ . n'` � should look away from the J,. • When considering consolidation of park ar ,;s 'J La Canada Drive area by moving Areas 1 & 2 ;: ` ea 3, or Area 4 to Area 3. �� `' �' olidation of the parks. Also look at topportion of plat w ;considerin 1 ..: °: . .:,,:acres ize is close which allows • Rancho Vistoso PAD Neighbor .. ,�, Ary:,.... ) for a large park area that provides_ rtsr:::F..::. J • as, trail area, connection to trail in wash and ties into school site. i ,, Y': • r• Look at maximizing viiefiti4svt*V., . �,,•�:: �� his i�"�•�� not be continued. He stated that any Dick Maes, Vistoso Partner, t,y ,'.. ask r;y .�.x:...�. �� . sem �'�`,1'?�:%:;. �i,J��gy%P.'s�C`�.i,•�": yJi:�f ':v �;,. �.o'Y,i•Jl.f �x'<<G,.'y':"•::<•%;/+7rt.'',,�r.�'::.:.9:.i"61j3.Y: � '�r�•�' � �" ' `��'��'��x'•r�%`�;�`•±•`A��•Y•�� answered between now and the final }:: • "=A. 'b e questions or concerns re� ,'s .:vr.;, 4 ..�. .; ��,.:;:..:: pty`a lat. He stated that.:,the arY ::,shown on the preliminary plat are in response to p F '�"n + "V`"J he Development Review Board. with �...��..f F•::::••x�: :.:: —.1;04;, meetings ' �:sta �Y�.� =��t **- ..Y'`. Abbott MOVED to CONTINUE consideration of OV12- 02-04 MOTIO Ancil Mei�:.' 02-04 for one lth (Aprilf thmeeting) in order for applicant to provide a better recreation plan • rd:en: % s safety elements associated with areas that are fronting on ..,:.:...:. .w major collector stre ; d to identify the consolidation of various recreation areas. Council Member Roc � �"��''Y nan SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 3 — 1 with Council Member Wolff opposed. 7. OV12-02-20 REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR AN OFFICE AND LABORATORY FACILITY, LOCATED WITHIN RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 2, (PARCEL #22302014B) Planning and Zoning Administrator Bryant Nodine reviewed a location map showing Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 2. He reported that Intertech Architectural Interiors Inc., representing GUM Technology Corporation is requesting approval of the proposed p g 03/19/03 Agenda,Council Regular Session 9 development plan for a 10,447 SF building on 1.23 acres which is zoned Campus Park Industrial. Mr. Nodine explained that there is approximately 44,350 square feet of natural open space on the 53 143 square foot site. The site is relatively flat, with minimal vegetation p q and with no riparian or flood plain areas. He stated that there is a small amount of 15 — p 25% slope areas. Mr. Nodine then reviewed the recommended open space trade and explained that what is designated as open space now does not meet the criteria of open space as defined in the Planned Area Development (PAD) and is not in a critical area that should bep rotected. Staff is recommending a land trade to move the open space on the property and place it in an area that "makes more sense" and to replace a trail and provide p Y an alternative connection for the existing isolated trail. The trade . *. ,would be for approximately1.4 acres verses less than 1 acre that currently e 1.,... reviewed the recommendation for the trai .. ch`,:.``:; �::d provide a Mr. Nodine also N.; Jf� r, ' �� aged that g114,:; .-: � � els that the continuation to a residential area through Big Wash. H:: , isa benefit to the Town and create ood open spac ; / that open space trade ��•�:�'�� + connects to another open space area and rovides frail c:I ,ections. fl.:stated that the p p p „} A 7 property owners are willing to provide a developr . ,r+ :': ent to provide an easement for the trail and to provide the open space. Mr. Nodi;"" n reviewed the development �� •� rrr. with the :•::enteral Plan Policies: and provides for plan and stated that it complies �•,�,�..,,. ��: "• clustered buildings to preserve the viewf `''` � t ro ,.Fees. 4,t,of„4 ry;.>: .rte ,:; ,_;,;•.;. p ,��.:. tat�� ,:,415'.),14#1P¢ fi `�-"'applicant was present for Steve Shields, Intertech Architecture, re r `::.. pp questions . { f lJ/�Sv O /'elf* MOTION: Council Weil:floc&R o li"r , ��M �OV to APPROVE OV12-02-20, �: ? Development Plan for thyy: , : - 4 yfwiththe condition as listed in Exhibit hib : s+. Vii, r•{r'•z:;. '<:,, ,`,.,;• .; r,r Exhibit "A" 1. El evati oxdiLf' the a•�i'" ,�sarea be revised to ensure the minimum slopee of 0.5% is maintaineyf{ ;.;.c!',��y{;r•;.;. orf,401 Council Membe"oIff: ONDED the motion. Motion carried, •��•~ . fir. Mayor Loomis recessed` the meetingat 9:12 a.m. The meeting resumed at 9:20 p.m. 8. OV 12-02-19 REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT TO BE LOCATED IN THE ROONEY RANCH PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT, AREA B, NORTHEAST OF THE HOME DEPOT, (PARCEL #22008001J) Community Development ment Director Brent Sinclair reviewed a location map for the requested development plan. He reported that Commercial Development Properties, Inc., q p representing The Tosco Corporation is requesting approval of the proposed development p g plan, which includes a 5,155 square foot Big-O-Tire Store and a 5,445 square foot retail 03/19/03 Agenda,Council Regular Session 10 building in the Rooney Ranch Planned Area Development (PAD) Area B. Mr. Sinclair further explained that a dedicated Public Drainageway provides for a natural buffer in the area. The applicant has also provided for an in-lieu fee for a pathway to connect to Oracle Road to the CDO Wash. He then reported that the site meets the standards and specifications of the Zoning Code Revised and complies with the General Plan Design Policies. Mr. Sinclair stated that Development Review Board (DRB) addressed parking requirements and loading facilities, and approved a reduction in parking spaces based on the fact that the retail tire business would require less parking than required by Code (Alternative Parking Compliance Analysis has been completed.) He stated that staff and the DRB recommend approval. rf ri f/f��.F F R."f•J. Q.k�' Ed Dunshey, developer for the site, reviewed the design elei t ;.:the proposed project. He stated that theyhave worked with Town staff on the design•o `° oject. They are providing for extensive landscaping and dedication off/ l head on 4. :::,,ste and will /G':f fir'%�f`• • ��`l�'''::. install sidewalks for connections. He stated that theeil section of th=�=;, Y vould be 5,155 square feet and the Big 0 Tire Center would` `'` 445p':��uare feet in size. He then :Cry FF�k:✓•/ : )�•'•'�;y�: reviewed the plans, and elevations of the 'AP" IVr fF? In response to a question from Mayor Lois.rregarding p ng, Mr. Dunshey reviewed ' ✓Sf•;%?iji'r v%Il '• VA*Dine the parkingareas and explained that the , : :.. with�-„:erne Depot regarding shared p �;� /.,s,.:s;,w,:;r:•:off.>;,:• parking if more space is needed for the r :t) buildingsiApie future. 4,04#-6%- In response to a question from .y°` ” :til Member`Abbott Mr. Nodine reviewed the screeningof the workbays `�/' � that ....?.f•y,;`he distances from Oracle Road, the :�F.%r / /'fx f•.'"F'•f.` fyF¢, Ff'l Y;.•. screening walls and the { p p •�. :��sca i�:�,.,...:�,. amok,.�"`� DRB feel that the plan more than meets /k!ab.<a.. y the intent of the Zoning } ff"" MOTION: Cc0er � f :bf.MOVED to APPROVE O 0 9, Development Plan for the : -O Tire: e, with- conditions listed in Exhibit A. Council Member �:;..:`' 7/.:;,�;�.fir`; ,,.. Rochman f :: 11;NDED th�>:",option. wry��:%/St;f,�Fl:i Exhibit «A„ v}v5:� S :: : ;.. 1. A general note s 4"" N added to the Development Plan providing a schedule for the maintenance of the fiat flush/detention basin. 2. Easement documentation (Docket and page) for sanitary sewer MH1 to existing MH shall be provided on sheet 2 of the Development Plan. 3. Details shall be provided to accurately depict the proposed grading between the basin and sidewalk. Further discussion followed regarding: ■ Reduction in parking spaces and customer safety concerns. • Note#49 addresses parking issues and was thoroughly discussed at the DRB meeting. 03/19/03 Agenda,Council Regular Session 11 • Shared parking is not really an issue unless the use in the retail building changes to a "high traffic type"of use. MOTION CARRIED, 3 — 1, with Council Member Abbott opposed. TOWN MANAGER'S REPORT Town Manager Chuck Sweet announced that the Arizona State Parks Board would be meeting in the Hopi Room in the Development Services Building on Thursday, March 6th at 9:00 a.m. DEPARTMENT HEAD REPORTS—No reports. • /9241' •1;r r:r: COUNCIL REPORTS—No reports. `"c:00, 4. CALL TO AUDIENCE—No speakers. - �.,� ADJOURNMENT ;GO/ f ker MOTION: Council Member Wolff MOVED to A� ` Y4; YN at 9:45 p.m. Council �� ,�f J fJr,.:i• Member Rochman SECONDED the mot ,:1Vlotion cam ;::4—0. J y <%1�' � r 1,� �•4.,.... ,.�2 y;`�. 4.'" SF` Yom. �i,b � 1.�.:..:. ��..:� .:�•.��tted .' , tea.' çir ....i'r �� Ji,;i� ?ry'':J�r�f,�,p.�r,�9'•.�:'fry/•',.r:,. �CVif. r7"••`i / %,f?rfr/•::f{ 3r'n'""f' 4,`•• �f'�''�r': {rf,.frf jff''t;'•-r%{'' r.�:`✓`F /y o":G r,GG:n c:•N�n:... Suis' �f:G::',..r 'rr::f+ t '.•'!,:1.. �(.'::i-,sir•l�i .. OM(ana Garrity, CMC 7t v Town Clerk {rii:;3.4vs! fnu:rivf rr }o./;,,r':'t••::::: ,4 •1r /r/.err. 1,.." fie? �• J 1.f��.. Ii J";;?• /r/e�f•f:; rff f::>: I hereby certify that foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the regular session'of the Town of Oro Valley Council of Oro Valley, Arizona held on the _19th_ day of March 2003. 1 further certify that the meeting was duly called and held and that a quorum was present. Dated this day of , 2003. Kathryn E. Cuvelier, CMC Town Clerk TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: April 2, 2003 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Jim Hossley Operations Division Manager SUBJECT: Resolution No. (R) 03- 24 , Acceptance of bid and Award of contract for Project No. 00j01-22 Mutterer Wash—Channel Improvement BACKGROUND: This project is to provide flood and bank erosion protection along the east and west sides of Mutterer Wash. The portion of the Mutterer Wash to be improved by this project is on a 52 foot wide and 930 foot long strip of land owned by the Town of Oro Valley. Hand placed rock rip rap will be laid along the wash channel extending from the box culvert beneath Greenock Drive south 930 feet to an existing gunite channel Additional work to be accomplished includes clearing, grubbing, grading, excavation, placement of Reno Mattress grade control structures,re-grading an existing alley on the west side of the wash,preserving and transplanting trees and shrub species,and landscape irrigation. In response to the advertisement for bids, the Town received eight bid proposals. The bid proposals were opened by Town staff at 2:00 P.M.on March 21,2003. The following is a summary of the bids received along with the engineer's estimate: 1.N.A.C.Construction $ 135,460.00 2.Young&Sons Contractors $ 136,769.15 3.Anncole Construction $ 147,711.00 4.Dar-Hil Corporation $ 162,032.50 5. K.A.Z.Construction $201,025.00 6. Falcone Brothers $207,758.00 7. West Point Contractors $226,950.00 8. M.Anderson Construction $264,250.00 Engineers estimate $202,075.00 ATTACHMENTS: 1.Resolution (R)03 -24 FISCAL IMPACT: Pima.County Bond Funds have been designated for this project TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 2 RECOMMENDATIONS: Public Works staff recommends the awarding of this contract to N. A. C. Construction through the adoption of the attached resolution. SUGGESTED MOTION: The Town Council may wish to consider one of the following motions: I move to approve Resolution Number(R) 03-24 . Or I move to deny approval of Resolution Number (R) 024. -L) LAIL, %, William A.Jansen,P.E.,lillbt Engineer , _ top ./- , ? Chuck Sweet,Town �anager RESOLUTION NO. (R) 03-24 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, APPROVING AUTHORIZATION FOR THE MAYOR TO CONTRACT WITH N.A.C. CONSTRUCTION FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MUTTERER WASH CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, the construction of a flood and erosion protection improvements within Townp pro erty is necessary to the public health, safety, and welfare in order to provide for the safe and effective flow of flood waters;and WHEREAS, the Town Council deems it necessary, in the interest of providing for the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Oro Valley, to authorize the Mayor to contract with N.A.C. Construction for construction of channel improvements along approximately 930 linear feet of Mutterer Wash to include grading, excavating, clearing and grubbing, preserve and transplant trees and shrub species, landscape irrigation, construction rock riprap banks, installing Reno Mattresses, re-grading existing dirt alley for positive drainage and other incidental items of work. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE MAYOR AND THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY,ARIZONA: Authorizing the Mayor to contract with N.A.C. Construction for construction of channel improvements along approximately 930 linear feet of Mutterer Wash to include grading, excavating, clearing and grubbing, preserve and transplant trees and shrub species, landscape irrigation, construction rock riprap banks, installing Reno p Mattresses, re-grading existing dirt alley for positive drainage and other incidental items of work. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley,Arizona this 2ND day of MARCH ,2003. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY,ARIZONA Paul H.Loomis,Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Kathryn E. Cuvelier,Town Clerk Town Attorney Date Date f. . TOWN OF ORO VALLEY _ COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: April 2, 2003 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Bryant Nodine, AICP, Planning and Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. (R)03-25 A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY AND TERRITIORIAL SIGN COMPANY REGARDING THE PROVISION OF KIOSK SIGNAGE SUMMARY: This is a renewal of the revised contract first approved by the Town Council on August 15, 1996. Through this contract, the Townp rovides a comprehensive and consistent signage program for builders in the Town. Under this contract, the Town Council approved kiosk signage within Town rights-of-way. Territorial Sign Company constructs the signs, at its own expense, and rents space to homebuilders and apartment owners at market rates (up to $18 per month per placard in accordance with the contract). The Town collects a fee of$3 per month per placard to cover costs of the inspections necessary to ensure contractor performance. The Town expends no public monies on this program. The kiosk sign program has experienced very few difficulties to date these were primarily related to visibility due to surrounding vegetation, maintenance of the signs by the contractor, and the difficulty of obtaining ADOT approval for signs on Oracle Road. These problems have been addressed in the last few years. The program won a State planning award and public reaction has been strongly positive, with citizens expressing appreciation for the removal of bandit signs. The attached contract is, essentially, as previously approved except that the contract term has been revised to three years versus two. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends Council adoption of the referenced contract. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. (R)03-25 a contract between the Town of Oro Valley and Territorial Sign Company regarding the provision of kiosk signage. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. (R)03-25 2. Exhibit A: Proposed Contract Between the Town of Oro 4 - Valley and Territorial Sign Company Regarding the Plannin: an •ning A 4 ministrator Provision of Kiosk Signage e � fr�� a -/tj Community Development Director F:\ov\ov13\1995\13-95-57\Contract to TC 040203.doc Town Manager RESOLUTION NO. (R)03-25 A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, FOR A CONTRACT BY AND BETWEEN THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY AND TERRITORIAL SIGN COMPANY FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION AND OPERATION OF A KIOSK SIGN PROGRAM, IN ACCORDANCE WITH SEC. 12-502M, ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED. WHEREAS, the Town of Oro Valley, in September, 1995, adopted a new Oro Valley Sign Code (Chapter 12, Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised)to provide for Kiosk Identification Signs; and WHEREAS, the Town subsequently negotiated a contract with Territorial Sign Company to implement that program and adopted the contract via Resolution No. (R)96-07 on February 21, 1996 and revised the contract via Resolution No. (R)98-77 on October 7, 1998; and WHEREAS, The contract has expired and the Town of Oro Valley now seeks to renew and revise the contract; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, AS FOLLOWS: Territorial Signs is hereby authorized to implement the requirements of Sec. 12-502M in accordance with the contract provided as Exhibit "A" The Mayor is hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement for, and on behalf of, the Town of Oro Valley, and that the Town Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to countersign same. PASSED, ADOPTED, AND APPROVED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this 2nd day of April, 2003. Paul H. Loomis,Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Town Attorney EXHIBIT A TO RESOLUTION NO. (R)03-25 CONTRACT FOR SERVICES This Agreement entered into this day of , 2003, by and between the Town of Oro Valley, Pima County,Arizona, a body politic of the State of Arizona, hereinafter referred to as"Town" and Territorial Sign Company, hereinafter referred to as "Contractor", for the purposes of creating kiosk directional signs, placing said signs and implementing the Town Kiosk Sign Program, as further described in Sec. 12-502.M of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised. WITNESSETH WHEREAS,the Town of Oro Valley adopted an amendment to the Oro Valley Sign Code on September 6, 1995, which prohibited the erection of off-site directional signs within the Town's boundaries; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Town to ban the use of off-site directional signs, in order to eliminate visual impacts and improve public safety, but at the same time,to give builders/developers in the Town the opportunity to provide direction to various building and/or apartment sites, in order to promote sales or rentals; and WHEREAS,the Town advertised, according to State and local laws,for proposals from sign contractors interested in, and qualified to implement,the kiosk sign program,as set forth in Sec. 12- 6502.M; and WHEREAS, the Town received a proposal from Territorial Sign Company, a company deemed to be qualified, and competent, to manage the program, on behalf of the Town, but as an Independent Contractor and not as an employee of the Town; and WHEREAS, Contractor desires to contract with the Town to perform such services; NOW,THEREFORE,the Town and the Contractor, in consideration of the mutual promises as hereafter set forth, mutually agree as follows: I: BASIC SERVICES OF CONTRACTOR In conformance with Sec. 12-502.M,Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised,the Contractor agrees to perform the following basic services under this Agreement: A) To construct kiosk signs,of the design approved by the Development Review Board and Town Council (OVI 3-95-57), in the quantity required and approved for use by the Town of Oro Valley, and B) To implement the program, based upon Sec. 12-502.M, the Contractor shall be responsible for: 1. Coordination of an off-site subdivision tract and apartment sign program within the Town limits. 2. The manufacture of all kiosks and tract signs. All signs shall be built in accordance with the specifications of the International Building Code and specifications of the Town's Building Safety Division. 1 3. The placement of the signs in accordance with all permit specifications provided by the Town. 4. The Contractor shall also be responsible for the maintenance or replacement of the signs and cleanup of the general area of the sign (including trimming of vegetation and keeping the area litter free) as needed or determined by the Planning and Zoning Division for the Town. 5. Maintaining a one million dollar general liability insurance policy,and naming the Town as an additional named insured on that policy. 6. All administrative costs, including marketing of the services to subdivider and apartment developers, as well as collection fees. C) Details: 1. Sign Location: Off-site subdivision tract or apartment signs shall be permitted in any zone in the Town, and may be located within the Town right-of-way as far from the roadway as practicable for safety, or in accordance with amendments to the sign code made by the Mayor and Town Council from time to time, provided that they are located only on arterial or collector streets,and no more than two such signs, placed perpendicular to one another on opposite corners may be permitted at any one intersection. All locations must be approved by the Planning and Zoning Administrator and Town Engineer and a permit must be issued by the Town for each individual kiosk sign erected. The Contractor will be required to remit a one-time charge of$50.00 for each kiosk identification sign erected. The Contractor shall provide off-site signs, in an approved kiosk, to any subdivider, tract developer or apartment owner who requests such signs, consistent with any Town approval(s) of the appropriate kiosks. 2. Form: As approved by the Development Review Board and Town Council, and in accordance with the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised Section 12-502.M for construction and installation by the selected contractor. At a minimum, a kiosk shall mean a structure constructed of four(4) inch by six (6) inch posts, or similar structure upon which off-site subdivision, tract or apartment signs may be mounted. The header of the kiosk shall be painted with the words "Town of Oro Valley". 3. Removal: Any kiosk containing less than three(3)signs,for a period of ninety (90) days, shall be removed by the Contractor. 4. Public Service Signs: The Contractor shall place Town public service signs on any kiosk, provided the kiosk has five (5)or fewer off-site signs, at no cost to the Town. No kiosk shall be required to be removed if it contains Town public service signs. 5. Standards: Planning and Public Works staff shall review applications for the location of the kiosks pursuant to the kiosk identification program. Staff shall provide written approval of sign applications and staff shall not approve kiosks unless the following standards are met and approved and signed off by staff in writing: a. There are no more than four (4) kiosks in any application; 2 b. A right-of-way permit, if applicable,and sign permit have been issued; c. Any kiosk proposed on private property shall have written approval from the property owner; d. Kiosks shall not obstruct the view of the traveling public and be consistent with generally approved traffic engineering and safety guidelines within the industry as determined by Town Planning and Public Works staff. 6. The Contractor may charge individual builders, developers or apartment leasers a maximum of$ 18 for the monthly rental of a placard sign on a kiosk. Said fee is hereby acknowledged and established by the Town Council as being a reasonable fee for such service. To cover costs of inspections to ensure contractor performance as established in Section I.B.4 of this contract, the Contractor will reimburse the Town $3 for each for the monthly rental collected on each placard. This will be provided to the Town on a quarterly basis. 7. Any and all liabilities, costs and expenses arising out of the installation and construction of kiosks, and administration of the provisions of this Contract, other than enforcement expenses related to violations of the Oro Valley Sign Code, shall be borne by the Contractor and the Town shall have no liability therefor, or at any time thereafter. Should the Town be named in a claim, lawsuit or arbitration, the Contractor agrees to reimburse the Town the full cost of participation, including reasonable attorney's fees. D) In performing the basic services, Contractor shall utilize applicable Oro Valley ordinances, standards and specifications. II: ADDITIONAL SERVICES Any services required beyond the scope outlined by the Town shall be negotiated and this Agreement may thereafter be amended by mutual agreement of the parties. III: TOWN'S RESPONSIBILITIES A) Upon execution of this Contract, the Town shall provide all those interested parties inquiring, i.e. current builders, developers, apartment leasers and any other parties eligible to utilize the kiosk sign program, as to the proper person within the Contractor's firm to contact in order to participate in the sign program; B) The Town shall provide assistance in locating right-of-way lines, as necessary. C) In the event that the Town eliminates the Kiosk program, all remaining Kiosk signs shall be permitted to remain in place as pre-existing nonconforming signs for the duration of this contract. IV: THE TERM OF THE AGREEMENT Unless sooner terminated pursuant to Section VII herein,this Agreement shall be in effect for three (3) years from the date of execution of this Contract. The Agreement may be extended by mutual agreement of the parties. 3 V: AGREEMENT SCHEDULE Upon execution of this Agreement, the Contractor is authorized to submit to the Town site plans for sign location(s)and commence construction and maintenance of the kiosk signs and clean up of the general area of the signs. The Contractor may advertise the service to be provided to interested parties. VI: REMUNERATION The Contractor understands that the Town of Oro Valley, in negotiating this Contract,will not pay the Contractor any fees for construction of signs, hourly rates, nor any incurred expenses and, in fact, the Contractor must remit appropriate permit and inspection fees, as outlined above. The Town acknowledges that the Contractor will derive financial benefit as a result of this contract, through rental fees for sign space on the kiosks, and Contractor is authorized to collect such fees for the life of this contract. Should this agreement be terminated, the Town has the option, exercisable within 60 days, of purchasing some or all of the kiosks. The price for each kiosk will be determined by the fair market value at the time of cancellation of the contract. VIII: INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR A) The parties stipulate and agree that Contractor is not an employee of the Town, and is performing its duties hereunder as an Independent Contractor,supplying its own employees,and maintaining its own insurance, workmen compensation insurance, and handling all of its own internal accounting. The Town in no way controls, directs or has any direct responsibility for the actions of the Contractor herein. B) The Contractor shall further be responsible for compliance with the United States Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, and shall indemnify and hold harmless the Town for any liability arising from failure of the Contractor to comply with said act. Said indemnification to include the costs of suit pursuant to Paragraph IX of this Agreement. C) The Contractor shall be responsible for compliance with the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, and every other Federal and State law, as applicable, and shall indemnify and hold harmless the Town for any liability arising from failure of the Contractor to comply with said Act. Said indemnification to include the costs of suit. IX: GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS A) Termination: Either party may terminate this Agreement upon thirty(30)days written notice to the other party. In the event the Town shall terminate the service or any part of the services as herein provided,the Town shall notify the Contractor in writing and immediately after receiving such notice the Contractor shall discontinue advancing the work under this Agreement and proceed to close said operations under the Agreement. B) Choice of Law: The parties stipulate that this Agreement has been made and entered into, and shall be construed, enforced and governed by the laws of the State of Arizona. 4 C The terms set forth in this Agreement, as supplemented by the terms and conditions set forth in the Town's Request for Proposals dated October 27, 1995, and the Contractor's Proposal dated December 7, 1995, shall be interpreted in such a manner that all terms shall be given effect. In the event of an express conflict, the terms of this Agreement are controlling. D) Indemnity: The Contractor agrees to relieve the Town of any responsibility for any willfully negligent act or willful misconduct by the Contractor during the course of this Contract. This provision will be included in any and all subcontracts awarded during this project. E) Insurance: Contractor shall provide for its own public liability insurance and general liability insurance each in the amount of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000). Each such policyshall specifically refer to and cover the indemnity clause herein. Contractor shall, prior to the execution of this Contract by the Town, deposit with the Clerk of the Town of Oro Valley,satisfactory proof of the existence of such policies including, but not limited to, a photocopy of the actual policy showing such coverage. Each such policy shall further contain provisions that such insurance is primary coverage and will not be cancelable by the insurer except after filing with the Town Clerk thirty (30) days written notice of any proposed cancellation. Further, such policies shall be kept in effect by the Contractor throughout the term of this Agreement, with no lapses in coverage. F) Assignment: The parties stipulate and agree that this is a Contract for services, and that as part of the consideration of this Contract, the Town has taken into account the experience and expertise of the Contractor. Therefore,this Contract is not assignable by the Contractor without prior written consent of the Town. However, nothing in this clause shall be deemed to prevent the Contractor from utilizing the services of in-house personnel in performing its duties under this Contract. X: SEVERABILITY This is the entire Agreement between the parties. If any portions of this Agreement are later found to be invalid or unenforceable, such portion shall be null and void and without any effect on the rest of the Contract,which shall continue in full force and effect. This Agreement may be altered only by a duly executed written Agreement. XI: LITIGATION In the event of any litigation arising out of this contract or to enforce any provision or right hereunder, the unsuccessful party litigant covenants and agrees to pay to the successful party therein all such successful parties' costs and expenses, expressly included, but not limited to, reasonable attorney's fees and court costs incurred by such successful party in connection with such litigation. XII: NON-DISCRIMINATION The parties agree to be bound by applicable state and federal rules governing Equal Employment Opportunity and Non-Discrimination. XIII: ARBITRATION The parties agree that should a dispute arise between them, in any manner, concerning the attached Contract, and said dispute involves the sum of$10,000 or less in money damages only, exclusive of interest, cost or attorney's fees, the parties will submit the matter to Binding Arbitration 5 pursuant to the Arizona Supreme Court Rules for Compulsory Arbitration and the decision of the arbitrator(s) shall be final and binding upon the parties. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY TERRITORIAL SIGN COMPANY By By Paul H Loomis, Mayor Owner ATTEST: By Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By Town Attorney 6 D TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Page 1 of 1 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: 04/02/03 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: Joseph N. Andrews, Civil Attorney SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. (R) 03-26 ADOPTION OF POLICY NO. 10, SUPPLEMENTING THE TOWN COUNCIL POLICIES IN REFERENCE TO THE TOWN COUNCIL, ADVISORY BOARDS AND COMMISSION MEMBERS SITE TOURS POLICY SUMMARY: On February5, 2003 the Town Council discussed this issue which resulted in its being placed on tonight's agenda for action. The Amendment to the current Town Council Policies referencing the policy for Town Council, Advisory Boards and Commission Members Site Tours is a supplement. If approved, this policy is effective immediately. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. (R) 03-26 A Resolution of the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, Adopting a Policy with Regards to Town Council, Advisory Boards and Commission Members Site Tours. 2. Policy No. 10—Town Council, Advisory Boards and Commission Members Site Tours RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Policy No. 10 supplementing the Town Council Policies referencing the Town Council, Advisory Boards and Commission Members Site Tours be approved. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to adopt Resolution No. (R) 03-26 adding Policy No. 10, Town Council, Advisory Boards and Commission Members Site Tours to the Town Council Policies. r'44 k 4 A ar Tow 7Attorn y I 4 alk t Chuck Sweet, Town (anager F:\Council\Regular\040203 CC re Site Tours.doc RESOLUTION NO. (R) 03- 2f A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, ADOPTING A POLICY WITH REGARDS TO TOWN COUNCIL ADVISORY BOARDS AND COMMISSION MEMBERS SITE TOURS WHEREAS, the TOWN OF ORO VALLEY is a political subdivision of the State of Arizona, andp ursuant to Article 13, Section 7 of the Arizona Constitution, is vested with all rights, privileges,rivile es, benefits, and is entitled to the immunities and exemptions granted g . municipalities and political subdivisions under the Constitution and laws of the State of p Arizona and the United States; and WHEREAS, attendance by the Town Council, Advisory Boards and Commission Members at Site Tours will be of direct benefit to the Town and makes actions rendered to the Town more effective; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that it is in the best interest of the Town to clarify what the Town Council, Advisory Boards and Commission Members protocol is at a Site Tour. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, that the Town Council, Advisory Boards and Commission Members Site Tours Policy is hereby adopted. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and any other administrative officials of the Town of Oro Valley are hereby authorized to take such steps as are necessary to execute and implement the Policy. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this 2ND day of APRIL , 20 03 . TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Paul H. Loomis, Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Town Attorney Office of the Town Attorney/ca 031903 F:\Rcsolutions\Site Tours final.doc Policy No. 10 Date Adoption Date of Revision TITLE: TOWN COUNCIL, ADVISORY BOARDS AND COMMISSION MEMBERS SITE TOURS Page 1 of 2 I. Purpose and Need for this Policy Thep �u ose of this policy is to establish a protocol for Site Tours to prevent violations of the Open Meetings Law. II. Policy Town Council, Advisory Boards and Commission Members will observe the following when on Site Tours: A Site Tour is a"tour" only and not a public meeting. If more than two (2) Town Council, Advisory Board or Commission Members are present on a Site Tour, proper protocol is that Members may only listen to information given p and only ask questions to clarify what exists on the proposed plan. Any discussion, deliberation and possible action regarding changes to the plan must be reserved for a regularly scheduled meeting. III. Other Information Attached is a"Sample"regarding Public Notice to be used for the Town Council, Advisory Boards and Commission Members Site Tours. APPROVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL: Mayor Paul H. Loomis Date: Office of the Town Attorney/ca 031903 Town Council Policy No.10 Page 2 of 2 "SAMPLE" NOTICE OF PUBLIC TOUR TOWN OF ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL Notice is hereby given to the members of the Town of Oro Valley Town Council and to the general public, that the Town of Oro Valley Town Council will hold a tour open to the public on March 18, 2003, at 9:00 a.m. located at the Kachina Conference room, 11000 N. La Canada Drive, Oro Valley, Arizona 85737. sf ' y £� i; :4 ;:5, Aq uorum of the full Town of Oro Valley Town Council may be present. This is a tour only and not a meeting. There may be information provided andlor questions and answers during the tour. Discussion and possible action will take place at,a regularly scheduled meeting. The itinerary for the tour is as follows: t Sample Itinerary iri,Table Format 9:00 a.m. Tour participants arrive at the Kachina Conference Room, 11000 N. La Canada T- JDrive, Oro Valley, Arizona for 5 S<' transportation to the Naranja Town Site property 9:15 a.m. Tour Naranja Town Site 9:45 a.m. ,ii> °nr5 ,3x{ '� Return to 11000 N. La Canada Drive, Oro �S.L > 'r i f ' y Valley, Arizona ts, For further information, call Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk, at (520) 229-4700. For reasonable accommodations, call Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk, at (520) 229-4700. ji•r J Date of Publication TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: April 2, 2003 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL FROM: Shirley Seng,Utility Administrator SUBJECT: Acceptance of the Oro Valley Water Utility Commission Annual Report date April 2003 SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Oro Valley Town Code Article 15-4-5, the Oro Valley Water Utility Commission is to render an annual report to the Town Council on or before April 1st. Attached is a copy of the Oro Valley Water Utility Commission Annual Report dated April 2003 for your review and consideration of acceptance. This report is the Commission's sixth annual report. It includes recommendations related to revenue requirements,rate adjustments, renewable water supplies,water conservation,debt service,and capital improvements. It also provides an overview of the utility's accomplishments during the past year. Within the Annual Report, the Commission has recommended to delay implementation of the proposed potable water rates until an Engineer's Feasibility Report can be completed. This report becomes part of the Offering Statement used to sell bonds to finance the reclaimed water system. The report contains a comprehensive review and summary of the water utility's capital requirements and current and future revenue generating strategies. When completed, the report will propose different scenarios for potable water rates,reclaimed water rates,potable water impact fees, alternative water resource impact fees and a potential groundwater preservation fee. Since these fees are inter-related,it would be prudent to wait until the report is completed prior to implementing any single rate. It is anticipated that the Engineer's Feasibility Report will be completed by June 2003. As in past years, the Commission and staff look forward to discussing the annual report with Council in a joint study session. FISCAL IMPACT: Acceptance of the annual report has no fiscal impact. Any recommendations contained within the report that have revenue and expense implications will be brought to Council for action on an individual basis. COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS: The Water Utility Commission respectfully recommends that Mayor and Council accept the Oro Valley Water Utility Commission Annual Report dated April 2003. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff concurs with the Water Utility Commission recommendation. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Oro Valley Water Utility Commission Annual Report dated April 2003 SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to accept the Water Utility Commission Annual Report dated April 2003. Or TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION PAGE 2 OF 2 I move to .`.I U. ry Adininistr.for Water Utility Director 4e-4A Town Manager f �. .., 0 ,,, , 4.,,,,.1101!0 . 'op 4 4 1 ihA a, 9 un a v 4a x "s x c n:r:w: ::li/� : C'S, YA0iLW X44 r d* 4 Y 4 .:;.:'';','.;;7,: :fyy, yg 's� l 4 ,,,i1:::,,,,';,::::: ',,..',.:!,'',Itlit,';',1014.,''',.;',-,.:''''''I..",.'.4.,.',.'''.''/''','' . 'r 1 , M1°:Y 5 n.l/. '„i''',:';',7f:''' v F / m e y .. . : ,,� a ..- , ,yo ,:.,4 ,..' :h, ,.ay l :...,, ,,...'.i ..,.! ,llu. .. !,/ •h'l ., .,,: ✓%a ., '��.. .„,,,,;:,:, . = „, ,, ' . .. I PO Valle tilater Corn 11 I "a ,,,,.i , ......„. i- ,,,,,,,,,,,,.,,,,,,..,,,,,,,,,,„,,,,,„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,„.,...,,,,..,,,,,,„,„,,„,.'''''''','„',','''''': ' ...... . ... , ,,,,,,,;„ ,..,,,,,,,,,, ,,,.,,,.., ,,„ ,, ,,..,,..,..,,,,:. OO ,MNuaIRep ' r ✓/Wi,1,,,�Zr ^a�.� . r ' :J. .: u.., ,,,,,,.. ?,. ,,, ,.,, . • ..,:,...y yi; ,„_,,,,,,:.„....,..,,,,.,,....,......,,,,...,.,,,,,,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,„,,„„:„„„,?,,.,,,,„„.„:„.„.„•,:,..:„.....;...,,..,......,,... ......,...,.•• ...,„„, .,.,:,. ,,.,,,,,,,...:;,,,,,,„,,.:,,,,•[„, .,s ..,..„,„„„,, ,,.,..,„,...:, .,,,,,,..,....„,,,,,,,,,.,,,,,,,,,,,, . .,...,,, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT APRIL 2003 ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL Paul Loomis, Mayor Richard Johnson, Council Member Bart Rochman, Council Member Werner Wolff, Council Member Paula Abbott, Council Member ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY COMMISSION Michael Caporaso, Chair Leo Leonhart, Vice-Chair Gordon Byrnes, Member Gregg Forszt, Member Jennifer Gillaspie, Member Erin Loudermilk, Member LaQuita Stec, Member Wendell Yoder, Finance Subcommittee TOWN STAFF Chuck Sweet, Town Manager Alan Forrest, Water Utility Director Shirley Seng, Utility Administrator David Andrews, Finance Director Special recognition to OVWU staff who provided information, graphics, photos and, most of all, their time to assist in the preparation of this report: Mary C. Kobida George Kendrick Charles Soper Iris Chaparro Carolyn Schneider Robert Jacklitch Edgar Rivera Jeff Kane David Ruiz TABLE OF CONTENTS TOWN OF ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT APRIL 2003 SECTION TITLE PAGE List of Acronyms i Index of Appendices ii Executive Summary 1 Potable Water System Preferred Scenario 6 Renewable Water Resources 7 Reclaimed Water System 9 Groundwater Preservation Fee 11 Conservation 11 Water Quality 13 Water Supply 15 Revenue Requirements 17 O & M and Debt Service Requirements 18 Capital Improvements 19 Recommendation on Potable Water Rates, Fees& Charges 21 Financial Summary 24 Conclusion 25 Appendices LIST OF ACRONYMS LIST OF ACRONYMS USED IN THIS REPORT ADEQ Arizona Department of Environmental Quality ADWR Arizona.Department of Water Resources AF Acre Feet CAGRD Central Arizona Groundwater Replenishment District CAP Central Arizona Project CCF One Hundred Cubic Feet (1 ccf = 748 gallons) CIP Capital Improvement Plan COLA Cost of Living Allowance CY Calendar Year EPA Environmental Protection Agency FY Fiscal Year GOVAC Greater Oro Valley Arts Council GPCD Gallons Per Capita Per Day GPM Gallons Per Minute IGA Intergovernmental Agreement IOC Inorganic Compound MCL Maximum Contaminate Level MDWID Metropolitan Domestic Water Improvement District O&M Operations &Maintenance OV WID#1 Oro Valley Water Improvement District #1 OVWU Oro Valley Water Utility POE Point Of Entry PWSMP Potable Water System Master Plan PQL Practical Quantitation Limit PVC Polyvinyl Chloride RWSMP Reclaimed Water System Master Plan SARWMS Southern Arizona Regional Water Management Study SCADA Supervised Control And Data Acquisition SOC Synthetic Organic Compound TCE Trichloreoethylene TTHM Total Trihalomethanes VOC Volatile Organic Compound pCi/L Picocuries Per Liter ppb Parts Per Billion ppm Part Per Million INDEX OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A. Potable Water Preferred Financial Scenario • 1) Assumptions # 2) Summary � 3) Enterprise Fund 5-Year Projected Net Income Statement 4) Enterprise Fund 5-Year Projected Debt Service Statement • 5) Enterprise Fund 5-Year Projected Cash Flow Statement B. Reclaimed Water System Proformas 1) Projected Income Statement • 2) Projected Cash Flow Statement • • C. Water Quality 40 1) Water Quality Monitoring Schedule for Year 2002 2) Water Quality Testing Results � D. Water Supply � 1) Figure 1: Present & Future Water Demands IP 2) Figure 2: Available Renewable Water Resources 2002 � 3) Figure 3: Estimated Renewable Water Resources 2030 • 4) Static Water Level Measurements E. 5-Year Capital Improvements Plan • 1) Existing System Improvements 2) Expansion Related Improvements 3) Reclaimed Water System F. Proposed Rate Schedules 1) Proposed Rate Schedule RS-1 2) Tables for Monthly Charges RS-1 10 G. Alternative Rate Schedules 1) Alternative Rate Schedule RS-2 • 2) Tables for Monthly Charges RS-2 +w 3) Alternative Rate Schedule RS-3 4) Tables for Monthly Charges RS-3 H. Service Fees and Charges � 1) Hydrant Meter Deposit • 2) New Development Construction Inspection& Plan Review Fees • I. Utility Statistics for Calendar Year 2002 ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TOWN OF ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT APRIL 2003 INTRODUCTION In October, 1996 the Oro Valley Town Council (Mayor and Council) formed the Oro Valley Water Utility Commission (Commission) to act as the official advisory body to the Mayor and Council regarding water related issues. The functions and duties of the seven member commission include reviewing and developing recommendations for water revenue requirements, water rate and fee structures, and water system capital improvement planning. The Commission is required to prepare an annual report to the Council regarding its recommendations. This report is the Commission's sixth Annual Report. It includes recommendations related to water conservation, revenue requirements, system operation and maintenance, debt service, a five-year capital improvements plan, rate adjustments and renewable water supplies. The Executive Summary contains a briefing on the implementation of the recommendations presented in the 2002 Annual Report as well as new recommendations specific to water issues facing the Town in FY 2003-2004 and beyond. Explanations and financial analyses that are more detailed may be found in the body of the report and the appendices. POTABLE WATER RATES The rates recommended by the Commission last year were adopted by Mayor and Council in June 2002. Implementation of those rates provided a 4.9% revenue increase. The increase was achieved by eliminating the 1,000 gallons of water that was included in the monthly base rate. There were no changes in the base rates or commodity rates. Included in the changes to the water rates was the establishment of a base rate for the 3/4"x 3/4" water meter. The Commission's preferred revenue scenario and rate design as they related to the potable water system are discussed in detail in the body of the report. Based on the analysis of five year projected expenses and required revenue, the Commission recommends the following rate structure for FY 2003-2004: ➢ The monthly base rates to increase by 2% and range from $12.25 to $1,224.00 per month depending on the meter size. ➢ The Tier 1 commodity rate to increase by 1% or 2 cents per 1,000 gallons. The rate is currently $1.90 per 1,000 gallons and will increase to $1.92 per 1,000 gallons. 1 ➢ The Tier 2 commodity rate to increase by 8.5% or 20 cents per 1,000 gallons. The rate is currently $2.35 per 1,000 gallons and will increase to $2.55 per 1,000 gallons. ➢ The Tier 3 commodity rate to increase by 8.3% or 25 cents per 1,000 gallons. The rate is currently$3.00 per 1,000 gallons and will increase to $3.25 per 1,000 gallons. ➢ Implementation of the potable water rates to be delayed ('- 3 months) until such time as the financial analysis and revenue requirements related to the reclaimed water system have been completed. ➢ Implement both potable water and reclaimed water rates simultaneously through established rate setting procedures. Thero osed rate design will generate a 2%revenue increase allowing the utility to meet the p p revenue requirements for this coming fiscal year. Additionally, the rate is designed to move toward a"cost of service" rate and continue to promote water conservation. The body of the report contains specifics on new fees to be established for FY 2003-2004. The proposed fees for new development construction inspection and plan review are designed to recover the utility's cost for performing these services. RENEWABLE WATER RESOURCES Activities undertaken this past year represent a continuation of those planned and reported in previous years. Notably, the Town awarded a design contract for Phase I of the reclaimed water system. It is anticipated that design of the reclaimed water system will be completed by Y November 2003. Construction may begin as early as January 2004 and is scheduled to be completed by June of 2005. Phase I will provide reclaimed water for turf irrigation north of p Tangerine Road. The reclaimed users include Stone Canyon Golf Course, Highlands at Vistoso Golf Course, Sun City Golf Course and Woodburne Elementary School. Delivery of reclaimed water to these customers will conserve potable water capacity by approximately 480,000,000 gallons per year. This is an equivalent amount of water to serve 4,000 residential customers 10,000 gallons of water per month for one year. Financing issues related to the reclaimed water system are discussed within the debt service section of the Report. An intergovernmental agreement regarding permitting and operating managed in-channel g recharge of effluent in the Santa Cruz River was approved this year. A number of municipalities and other water providers joined together to maximize the ability to recharge and recover effluent water within the Santa Cruz River channel. The ultimate goal is to acquire credits that may be used to augment renewable water resources in the future. Details of the agreement may be found in the body of the Report. 2 RENEWABLE WATER RESOURCES SURCHARGE The renewable water resources surcharge is a proposed fee for the repayment of the construction debt associated with the reclaimed water system infrastructure. The Commission has recommended that the proposed surcharge become known as the Groundwater Preservation Fee. This is an important component of the utility's supply management function because it will assist in reducing excess demand on our groundwater supply and thereby contribute to the goal of sustainable water management. Sustainable water management is a concept whereby withdrawal of groundwater is limited to quantities less than the rate of aquifer recharge or other such amounts that will not lead to groundwater mining or declining groundwater levels within the aquifer. Sustainable management is also a goal of the Tucson Active Management Area, of which the Town of Oro Valley is a part. Discussion on the proposed cost per customer may be found in the body of the Report entitled Groundwater Preservation Fee. CONSERVATION The water conservation newsletter, Oro Valley Water Ways, was included in water bills every other month through September 2002. Since then, the Purple Pipeline has been included in water bills to educate the public on reclaimed water issues. The utility renewed its membership with the Water Conservation Alliance of Southern Arizona (Water CASA) which has continued to provide the utility with welcome packets and conservation retro-fit devices given to customers at no charge. Utility staff and Commission members stationed booths at the GOVAC Jazz Festival and the Arts& Crafts Fair to promote water conservation by speaking directly to residents and providing them with conservation related pamphlets directed at all ages. The utility recently filled its Water Conservation Specialist position. Addition of this position will allow the utility to focus on the possibility and/or feasibility of changing the building code with regard to hot water re-circulating pumps. It is also anticipated that the Water Conservation Specialist will become more involved with customers on an individual basis and will be able to demonstrate the effectiveness of water conservation by setting examples with proper management of water use at Town facilities. DEBT FINANCING Last year, the Commission's preferred financial scenario included the sale of bonds to finance capital improvements to the potable water system and to re-finance the debt to the City of Tucson for CAP water rights. During this past year, the capital improvements to the existing system were re-evaluated based on how the reclaimed water system will impact the potable water system. The outcome resulted in a reduction in capital improvements to the potable system. As a result, the utility will be able to construct new facilities on a "pay as you go"basis and will not need to re-finance the debt to the City of Tucson. 3 Financing issues for the reclaimed water system have not yet been finalized. The Commission has recommended the sale of bonds to finance the capital costs. It was further recommended that the debt be repaid with several sources of revenue. The first source of revenue for repayment would be the Alternative Water Resources Development Fee which is already in place. The second source of revenue would be the proposed Groundwater Preservation Fee. Additionally, it has been recommended that the utility's commodity rate for reclaimed water sales be established so that it will produce enough revenue to recover all reclaimed water operating and maintenance costs. In the event there is a surplus, that surplus would also be used for debt service. WATER QUALITY The utility is proud to report that it did not experience any water quality violations in calendar year 2002 for Total Coliform bacteria. Considering the number of people involved in thep rocess and the ease with which contamination of a sample can occur, the fact that no water quality violations occurred should be considered remarkable. Of the hundreds of other water quality samples tested annually, no contaminant was found to exceed the Maximum Contaminant Level(MCL). In a related matter, the water utility incurred a "failure to monitor" violation in November 2002 for inadvertently failing to test the water system for nitrates. Upon discovery, the utility notified the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) and immediately performed the testing. The results of the tests indicated that the nitrate levels were in compliance with ADEQ regulations and at no time were the utility's customers exposed to increased health risks. WATER SUPPLY Groundwater levels continued to decline placing added emphasis on the importance of delivering renewable water supplies for both potable and non-potable uses. During calendar year 2002, the water production system frequently operated between 95% - 100% of its capacity during peak hours in the summer months. Continuation of the drought and pumping of groundwater cause groundwater levels to decline, which in turn reduces the production capability of the existing system. The completion of new and/or replacement wells and increased reservoir capacity will help the production system keep up with the demand until the reclaimed system is constructed and golf courses are delivered a renewable source of water. During a routine review of the Oro Valley Water Utility's Assured Water Supply (AWS) Designation in late 2001, the Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR) found that the Town's service area population had grown much faster than anticipated in 1995. Concerned that we were approaching our original 10-year population projections several years early, ADWR recommended the Utility apply for re-designation as soon as practical. 4 Based on this recommendation, the Town contracted with Brown and Caldwell during FY 2001-02 to prepare a new AWS Application, including the required hydrology report, for submittal to ADWR. In June of 2002, Brown and Caldwell completed and submitted the hydrology study and AWS application to ADWR for their review. To date, we have not received a response from ADWR regarding the status of our application; however, we anticipate a favorable response in the near future. After ADWR approves the hydrology study, they will publish legal notice of their intent to issue our AWS designation and conduct the required public hearings. Once the ADWR Director is satisfied that all public comments have been adequately addressed by the Department, he will issue the Oro Valley Water Utility a new AWS designation. In the meantime, our current AWS designation remains valid. CONCLUSION The Oro Valley Water Utility Commission is proud to serve the Mayor and Council and citizens of the Town of Oro Valley. We are pleased to present our Annual Report to the Mayor and Council for their consideration. While much has been accomplished in the past year, the Commission looks forward to direction regarding those items detailed in the Report. We thank the Mayor and Council for their consideration, direction and guidance. 5 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT POTABLE WATER SYSTEM PREFERRED FINANCIAL SCENARIO The Commission has arrived at a recommendation that adheres to the sound financial criteria developed for the 1998 Annual Report. Described below, the Potable Water System Preferred Financial Scenario also incorporates the elements of the other recommendations detailed in this report. To enable the Commission to more fully understand the long-term effect of identifiable future variables that impact the utility's financial resources, estimates for revenue, O&M, capital expenditures and debt service have been forecast for a period of five years. Examples of major future expenses with varying long-term impacts are: costs incurred with membership in the CAGRD; lost revenue from the removal of golf courses from groundwater; costs for necessary capital improvements to the water system; growth factors; and debt service. Every effort has been made to employ the most accurate available data and reasonably conservative assumptions in the analysis of future financial requirements. The Commission developed a set of parameters for use in developing the Potable Water System Preferred Financial Scenario. The parameters used are as follows: ➢ Revenue increases are proposed only when necessary and in an amount no more than necessary. ➢ Projected expenditures are adjusted for inflation, O&M expenses, debt service and existing system improvements. ➢ Financial criteria established in 1998 must be met, setting the foundation for sound fiscal operation. ➢ CAP water rights acquired from the City of Tucson will be financed by payment directly to the City of Tucson ➢ No new debt is to be incurred as it relates to the potable water system. ➢ Golf courses are expected to be removed from groundwater over a period of years commencing in FY 2005-2006. > Revenue projections include a residential customer growth factor of 400 in all five years. This is a conservative estimate based on the more recent trend in growth within the Town. ➢ Expansion related revenue and expenditures are not considered for purposes of establishing potable water rates. They are discussed separately in the report. ➢ Alternative water related revenue and expenditures are not considered for purposes of establishing potable water rates. They are discussed separately in the report. Revenue increases occur in each of the five fiscal years in Potable Water System Preferred Financial Scenario. These increases allow the utility to anticipate changes in the future 6 revenues and expenditures including the loss of revenue when the golf courses are phased off groundwater. The scenario proposes generating needed revenue by modifying the monthly base rates and the commodity rates. Data for the five year projections assumes that both personnel and related costs will increase by 3% annually. The O&M costs are assumed to increase annually based on inflation factors received from the Arizona State Auditor General's office. In each year, the inflation factor is less than 3%. Allowances have been included for power costs and increases in depreciation relating to the addition of infrastructure. CAP water costs are anticipated to decrease and recharge costs are scheduled to increase; however, these costs are established by state agencies over which the Town has no control. CAGRD costs increase annually and then decrease as golf courses are removed from groundwater. Interest and principal payments on outstanding bonds gradually decrease over the five year period. Projections in years 3, 4 and 5 include decreases in revenue when three of the golf courses are no longer served groundwater. However, the utility will receive revenue from providing the golf courses a renewable source of water. It is projected that the revenue received from customers on the reclaimed system will be sufficient to recover the operations and maintenance of that system with any surplus being used to repay the associated debt. Therefore, revenue projections relating to the reclaimed water system have not been included in the Potable Water System Preferred Financial Scenario. The Commission is recommending that implementation of the proposed potable water rates be delayed until the financial analysis and revenue requirements of the reclaimed water system have been completed. It is further recommended that implementation of both the potable water and reclaimed water rates occur simultaneously through established rate setting procedures. Discussion on the preliminary reclaimed water commodity rates are contained in the Reclaimed Water System section of this Report. Additionally, financial projections for the reclaimed water system may be found in Appendix B. Analysis of the Potable Water System Preferred Financial Scenario indicates that it meets the established financial criteria. Retained earnings maintain a positive value and the net income • of the utility does not reflect a loss for more than two consecutive years. Additionally, the net revenues provide debt service coverage in excess of 1.0 times the annual debt service as • is fullyrecovered bythe rates. The total required by the bond covenants and depreciation ° expected cash outlays excludingcapital cash reserves are maintained in excess of 15/o of the y p • expenditures. • • The FY 2003-2004Jro'ected Income Statement, Debt Service Statement and Cash Flow p Statement for thepreferred financial scenario maybe found in Appendix A. PP RENEWABLE WATER RESOURCES The Town of Oro Valley is located within the Tucson Active Management Area (TAMA), one of five special water management areas within the State of Arizona. As such, the Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR) regulates groundwater use throughout the • • 7 im TAMA. In general, ADWR requires water providers to institute conservation programs, accurately measure and report groundwater pumpage, and within growing communities, • demonstrate a 100 Year Assured Water Supply (AWS), all aimed at eliminating groundwater mining within the TAMA by the year 2025. In particular, the AWS provisions require the use of renewable water supplies — directly or indirectly — as a means for bringing groundwater pumpage within the TAMA into balance. This concept is known as "safe yield". In order to meet these provisions, the Town of Oro Valley must acquire renewable water resources in quantities adequate to meet both existing and future demands. The following is a general description of the renewable water supplies available to the Town. This same information is provided graphically in Figure 1 (water demands); Figure 2 (existing resources); and Figure 3 (future resources) located in Appendix D. The Town currently has a legal allocation to CAP water in the amount of 6,748 acre feet per year. A portion of this allocation was acquired through the purchase of private water • companies by the Town (2,294 acre feet per year) and the remainder through an agreement • with the City of Tucson. In addition to this allocation, the Town anticipates acquiring a • portion of the currently unallocated Municipal and Industrial(M&I) CAP water as part of the reallocation process conducted by the State. ADWR has recommended that the Town of Oro Valley be allocated 3,357 acre feet per year, out of the approximate 60,000 acre feet per year available through this process. The reallocation ultimately requires approval of the U.S. Congress and is anticipated to occur within the next two years. Currently, the infrastructure necessary to convey CAP water to the Town does not exist, making direct use impossible at this time. However; the Town has been cooperating with • local waterP roviders and the Bureau of Reclamation to develop a regional CAP delivery system within the northwest Tucson area. In the meantime, the Town has been recharging a • portion of its CAP allocation and has accrued long-term storage credits (approximately 9,500 acre feet)that can be used to help meet its AWS requirements in the future. • In addition to CAP water, wastewater effluent is really the only other renewable water • resource available to the Town of Oro Valley. This resource is unique in the fact that it can be recycled (reclaimed) to a quality suitable for landscape irrigation water, particularly for large turf areas. Also, this is the only source of water available to the Town that actually increases in volume as population increases. • Through the execution of a water settlement agreement between the Town of Oro Valley and the City of Tucson in the year 2002, the Town acquired rights to the effluent generated within its water service area. The volume of this supply, available for use by the Town, is 111F estimated to be about 1,800 acre feet in the year 2002 and increases to approximately 4,000 acre feet by the year 2030. Currently, the Town does not have the infrastructure in place to take delivery of this water; however, plans are progressing for a transmission and distribution system for reclaimed water and a managed in-channel recharge project for effluent within the Santa Cruz River. Both of these projects are discussed in more detail later in this report. p 8 During the past 18 months, Town staff has been working with other water providers and governmental agencies within the region to develop a managed recharge facility within the Santa Cruz River channel to begin receiving recharge credits for effluent discharged into the river. According to State law, those who have ownership of the effluent being discharged into the river may apply to receive long-term recharge credits for the water actually recharged. These credits are limited to 50% of the water recharged within the boundaries of the managed recharge facility. The proposed Lower Santa Cruz River Managed Recharge Project is located within Pima County, along a 16 mile stretch of the Santa Cruz River. Secondary effluent is discharged to the river from the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Plant and the Ina Road Wastewater Treatment Plant, where a significant amount of it recharges within the proposed project area. Along with others, Oro Valley has legal ownership to a portion of the effluent discharged into the Santa Cruz River and is interested in accruing long-term recharge credits associated with its infiltration. To this end, a regional approach to permitting and operating the recharge facility has been undertaken and a facility permit application was filed with the Arizona Department of Water Resources in May of 2002. Early in the process, the Marana area expressed concerns regarding the potential recovery of these credits within their boundaries. In order to avoid litigation related to these issues, the involved parties consented to develop an agreement aimed at resolving these issues. To this end, the parties have successfully negotiated an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA)to settle the issue. A final permit for the facility is expected to be issued in April of 2003, with accrual of recharge credits beginning shortly thereafter. RECLAIMED WATER SYSTEM The approval of Intergovernmental Agreements (IGA) with the City of Tucson (Tucson) expedited the feasibility of implementing a reclaimed water delivery system to provide a renewable source of water for turf irrigation. In September 2002, the Mayor and Council approved the Reclaimed Water System Master Plan (RWSMP). The RWSMP identifies specific supply and connection options; potential utility and right-of-way conflicts along alignments; conversion issues of reclaimed users; infrastructure and its location; permitting and regulatory concerns; capital cost estimates; and an economic analysis. The reclaimed water system will be constructed in two phases. Phase 1 will supply reclaimed water to turf areas north of Tangerine Road. The infrastructure required for Phase 1 includes two pump stations, a one million gallon reservoir, and approximately eleven miles of transmission and distribution mains in varying sizes. The estimated cost to construct Phase 1 is $13 million. Design engineering is underway and is expected to be completed by November 2003 with construction expected to be completed by July 2005. Phase 2 will supply reclaimed water to turf areas south of Tangerine Road. Potential customers of Phase 2 include golf courses, schools and parks. The planned infrastructure includes a two million gallon reservoir; a pump station; and approximately twelve miles of 9 transmission and distribution mains and is estimated to cost $10 million. Delivery to Phase 2 customers is anticipated sometime in 2008. Proposed financing for the project is expected to be obtained through the sale of Municipal Property Corporation (MPC) bonds. Repayment of the debt is proposed to be accomplished through a combination of reclaimed water user fees, alternative water resource impact fees and revenue collected through the Groundwater Preservation Fee (GPF). The GPF is discussed in detail below. In order to sell bonds, the utility will need to have an executed IGA with Tucson that identifies the conditions and costs associated with "wheeling" Oro Valley's effluent through the City of Tucson's reclaimed water system. The Town will also need to adopt an ordinance mandating the use of reclaimed water for turf irrigation when it becomes available. Additionally, all fees intended to be a source of revenue to repay debt must be in place prior to the sale of bonds. The utility is recommending that the reclaimed source be purchased on an "interruptible" basis for several years. The cost for Tucson to deliver Oro Valley's reclaimed water on an interruptible basis is approximately 40% less than the cost to deliver it on a "non- interruptible" basis. The utility is confident that with the available supply of reclaimed water; extensive capital improvements the Town is making to the delivery system; and the fact that Tucson has other customers receiving non-interruptible supplies through the same infrastructure, it is unlikely the supply of reclaimed water to the Town would be interrupted with the exception of Tucson plant failures. However, any temporary interruptions or reductions in reclaimed water deliveries could be mitigated through use of the potable water system. As Tucson's demand for reclaimed water in the northwest area grows, the utility may choose to re-evaluate its infrastructure needs or prepare itself to pay a higher rate for a non-interruptible supply. Discussions with Tucson have resulted in an estimated cost for reclaimed water of$331.86 per acre foot on an interruptible basis in FY 2005-2006. The cost is based on Tucson's operating and maintenance costs for their reclaimed system and will be adjusted every year for the prior year's costs. The interruptible rate has no component for capital costs which saves the utility approximately $231 per acre foot. Preliminary projections on the reclaimed water system's revenue and expenses may be found in Appendix B. Assumptions used in these projections include capital costs for both phases of the reclaimed system using a 5.5% interest rate, estimated operating and maintenance costs; and standard depreciation rates. It is also assumed that the OVWU commodity rate for reclaimed water will be equal to that of the potable water rate and that there is no increase in the alternative water impact fees except for new turf facilities. The projections demonstrate that the proposed rates will meet all operating costs with a surplus being used to repay debt. The entire debt service is projected to be met using this surplus, impact fees collected and revenue collected from the GPF. The projected cost to the typical residential customer is approximately $2.50 per month and will increase over a period of time to $4.00 per month. 10 GROUNDWATER PRESERVATION FEE The Commission's 2002 Annual Report recommended the establishment of a "renewable water resources surcharge" to help finance the delivery system that will provide a renewable water supply for turf irrigation. The Commission is recommending that the surcharge be titled the Groundwater Preservation Fee (GPF) to more accurately identify why the fee will be assessed. As discussed in last year's report, it is proposed that the fee be assessed to everyone who benefits from the use of renewable water supplies. The use of renewable water supplies, such as reclaimed water, allows the utility to mine less groundwater, thus preserving groundwater supplies for domestic uses. All consumers will benefit from the preservation of groundwater; therefore, it is recommended that all consumers pay their fair share of the cost to deliver a renewable supply to the Town. It is further recommended that the GPF be established on a volumetric basis. In other words, the cost to each consumer will be based on the volume of water used. The less water that consumers use, the less they will pay. Preliminary financial projections for the reclaimed water system are contained in Appendix B. The projections will continue to be refined as actual costs become available. After design of the Phase 1 Reclaimed Water System is completed, the project is publicly bid and the bonds are sold, the utility will be able to finalize the costs and adjust the amount to be assessed. With the information available at the time of this writing, it is projected that initially the GPF will be billed at 25 cents for each 1,000 gallons of water used. The average residential customer uses 10,000 gallons of water per month, thus the cost for these customers would be $2.50 per month. Projections indicate that it will be necessary to increase the fee up to $4.00 per month over the course of time. Again, the less water a customer uses, the less they will pay. Implementation of the GPF is needed as soon as possible to help build reserves to repay debt incurred to construct the reclaimed water system infrastructure. The Commission will forward its recommendation on the GPF later this fiscal year. As stated previously, the Commission recommends that both the potable water and reclaimed water rates be implemented simultaneously. As with all rates, fees and charges, the GPF will be reviewed annually and adjusted as necessary. CONSERVATION In recognition of the current drought Arizona is experiencing and the impact such drought can have on the operations of a public water system, the Mayor and Council instructed staff to develop a policy to address such situations. Staff researched and evaluated drought and water shortage policies adopted by other communities in Arizona. With this information and 11 input from the Commission, staff developed a new water conservation and use reduction policy to replace what existed in the Town Code. In general, the new policy directs the utility to implement specific rules, regulations, penalties and plans for water conservation during times of drought and water shortages. The Mayor and Council adopted the code change in March 2003. An ongoing conservation program can provide customers with information to assist them in understanding the importance of conserving water. During FY 2002-2003 the conservation program made significant progress toward its short-term goals. The Commission recommends that the utility continue to improve and expand these conservation efforts. The O&M expenditures for conservation are proposed to increase by $15,000 for a total of $50,000 in FY 2003-2004. This will allow the utility to maintain an on-going conservation program which includes the following: > Membership in Water CASA ➢ Water Conservation Specialist to follow-up and maintain the conservation program by targeting commercial and public facilities and to assist with customer education, information and onsite visits or audits > Bi-monthly publication of the Oro Valley Water Ways conservation newsletter and the Purple Pipeline reclaimed water newsletter. ➢ Purchase educational materials such as workbooks, activity books and crayons for students. ➢ Provide a conservation booth at GOVAC events such as the Arts & Crafts Fair and Jazz Festival to distribute conservation information, educational materials, retrofits, etc. > Partner with other Town departments to decrease the use of irrigation water in and around Town facilities. ➢ Participate in discussions and provide input as it relates to conservation issues with existing and planned park facilities. ➢ Continued modification of the water rate structure to promote conservation. > Participate with the Town library to provide conservation and educational materials to Town residents. > Miscellaneous/Other (workshops,training, other Town events that may arise) The Commission reiterates its recommendation that a long-term conservation program be established to provide objectives and guidelines to minimize the decline of groundwater levels and to ensure that the Town has established codes where necessary for the protection of our water resources and the enforcement of regulations. The following are proposed long- term goals to be reviewed by the Commission in future years: ➢ Evaluate alternative funding sources such as grants. > Promote and help facilitate the use of CAP and/or reclaimed water. ➢ Evaluate the cost of establishing rebate programs for low flow toilets, front loading washing machines and hot water re-circulating pumps. ➢ Monitor and maintain Town owned irrigation systems in a manner that will set an example of conservation for the customers. 12 ➢ Review existing plumbing codes to identify which conservation oriented modifications are in need of change. ➢ Evaluate the options to establish a mobile landscape/irrigation unit to audit irrigation systems for residents via obtaining sponsorship for the unit. ➢ Assist the water utility to achieve regulatory compliance with the Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR) regulations and enforcement as it relates to the Town's GPCD, assured water supply designations and replenishment requirements through the CAGRD and groundwater decline. It is the intent of the Commission to include these issues in the work plan for FY 2003-2004 as well as future years. The Commission looks forward to returning to Mayor and Council with specific recommendations regarding proposed programs. WATER QUALITY The mission of Oro Valley Water Utility is to provide assurance that drinking water is safe, clean, and meets all local, state, and federal drinking water health standards. In order to protect public health, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) sets drinking water standards which all public water providers must meet. Regular monitoring and testing of the water supply is required to assure customers are provided with safe water in their homes and businesses. The USEPA regulations require water providers to regularly test public drinking water supplies for bacteria and other microorganisms, and numerous other natural-occurring or man-made organic and inorganic constituents. Over the course of a year, the utility collects hundreds of water samples from numerous sites including groundwater wells, reservoirs and pumping stations, and from locations throughout the water distribution system specially selected to represent the entire water delivery system. Each sample is tested for numerous constituents, which may include bacteria, minerals, metals, or man-made chemicals. The USEPA sets national drinking water standards, which are administered in Arizona by the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ). The utility provides all water quality testing results to ADEQ and works closely with that agency to ensure all federal and state standards are maintained. It is important to remember that the detection of a contaminant in drinking water does not necessarily represent a threat to public health. Current technology allows water utilities to detect extremely low levels of contaminants in drinking water. Groundwater is the source of all of the drinking water delivered by Oro Valley Water Utility. All drinking water, including bottled water, may reasonably be expected to contain at least small amounts of some contaminants. Oro Valley's groundwater contains dissolved minerals and organic compounds, which have been leached from the rock, sediments, and plant materials through which the water traveled. One would expect to find minerals such as calcium and magnesium, chloride, bicarbonate, and sulfate, and metals such as iron, copper, arsenic, and lead, which may be either beneficial or harmless at low concentrations, but harmful at high concentrations. In addition to these naturally occurring contaminants, our groundwater may contain contaminants resulting from human, industrial or domestic activities. For this reason, 13 water utilities must currently monitor for approximately 90 regulated and 48 unregulated contaminants. Three inorganic contaminants of special interest are arsenic, fluoride, and nitrate. Fluoride and arsenic are naturally occurring and tend to increase as water is drawn from greater depths. Arsenic is a naturally occurring mineral known to cause cancer in humans at high levels. Oro Valley Water Utility conducted compliance tests for arsenic in its wells in Calendar Year (CY) 2001. The water systems arsenic levels ranged from "no detect" to 1.3 parts per billion (ppb). The EPA standard for arsenic is now 10 ppb. Fluoride is found naturally in our drinking water. Oro Valley's groundwater has fluoride at low concentrations ranging from 0.15 to 0.58 ppm, well below the EPA limit of 4.0 ppm. Fluoride at a level of 1.0 ppm has been shown to help prevent tooth decay. In concentrations substantially greater than that, fluoride may be harmful. Nitrate is typically found in higher concentrations near the surface of the groundwater table because it is frequently associated with fertilizer use, septic tanks and other human activities. Nitrates in drinking water at levels above 10 parts per million (ppm) could pose a health risk for infants and the elderly. High nitrate levels in drinking water can cause blue baby syndrome. The concentrations for nitrates in Oro Valley's water ranges from"no-detect"to 3.8 ppm. The level of water hardness varies from one well to another. Hardness is a measurement of the concentration of calcium and magnesium in the water. If the hardness of water is more than 120 milligrams per liter (mg/1), then a water softener would probably reduce the formation of scale within a household and make soap lathering easier. The hardness levels in Oro Valley's water ranges from 32 mg/1 to 230 mg/l. Other contaminants that may be present in source water are microbial contaminants, such as viruses and bacteria, which may come from sewage, agricultural livestock, and wildlife. Total Coliform is an indicator to more closely monitor the distribution system for possible unwanted bacteria. During CY 2002, the utility performed 456 routine samples for Total Coliform bacteria and had no positive samples. The utility adds chlorine as a precaution against bacterial growth in its distribution system. Inorganic Compounds (IOC), such as salts and metals, can be natural occurring or result from urban stormwater runoff, industrial or domestic wastewater discharges, oil and gas production, mining, or farming. Testing for contaminants in this group resulted in "no detect" with the exception of fluoride and nitrate. Fluoride and nitrate levels were within the limits set by USEPA as discussed above. Synthetic Organic Compounds (SOC) include pesticides and herbicides, which may come from a variety of sources such as agriculture, urban stormwater runoff, and residential uses. None of these contaminants have been found in Oro Valley's water supply. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) include such compounds as trichloroethylene (TCE) and tetrachloroethylene (PCE). These compounds are volatile like alcohol or gasoline and are made up of relatively small molecules, that allow them to migrate readily through soils. Solvents such as TCE and PCE have been commonly used for cleaning machine parts and for 14 dry cleaning. Despite the vulnerability of groundwater to such contamination, Oro Valley's potable supplies are free of such contamination. Total Trihalomethanes (TTHMs) are formed when chlorine combines with naturally occurring organic material in water. Since the level of organic matter in our groundwater is extremely low, these compounds are found at very low concentrations. The highest TTHM result in any system sample was 0.0062 ppm. The standard is 0.8 ppm. Adjusted Gross Alpha is a measure of radioactivity due to naturally occurring minerals in groundwater. The standard for gross alpha radioactivity is set at 15 picocuries per liter (pCi/1). The range for Oro Valley's water supply is "no detect"to 4.3 pCi/l. Most lead and copper contamination occurs within the water distribution system and is caused by corrosive water coming into contact with plumbing materials that contain lead. Lead and copper are regulated by a Treatment Technique that requires systems to control the corrosiveness of their water. If more than 10% of tap water samples exceed the action level, water systems must take additional steps. For copper,the action level is 1.3 mg/L and lead is 0.015 mg/L. Water samples are taken within the customer's residence. As a result of meeting compliance regulations over several years, the utility is only required to sample every three years instead of annually. The Lead and Copper Rule established action levels for lead (0.015 mg/l) and copper (1.3 mg/1). Sampling in 2001 had results for lead as "no detect" and the highest copper level was 0.33 mg/l. The groundwater delivered by Oro Valley Water Utility meets all drinking water standards without treatment. However, approximately 0.5 ppm of chlorine is added to the drinking water supply at well sites, reservoirs and other facilities to provide assurance that water delivered to customers will remain free of microbiological contamination. Because of chlorine's effectiveness in killing germs, disinfection with chlorine provides critical protection for drinking water consumers. Around the world, millions of people suffer from waterborne diseases due to microorganisms in their drinking water. In the United States, we have few waterborne disease outbreaks because the water is very carefully monitored for disease-causing organisms. Most water providers add a chlorine-based disinfectant to the drinking water supply to kill existing microorganisms. A complete listing of all contaminants that the utility tests for and the most recent test results may be found in Appendix C. WATER SUPPLY The aquifer beneath the Town of Oro Valley is currently the sole source of water resources for potable and non-potable uses. Non-potable uses include turf irrigation of golf courses and parks. The current state of the aquifer is affected by long-term and short-term rates and distribution of groundwater withdrawals and recharge. Groundwater withdrawals occur at the active water supply wells owned and operated by the Town and some privately owned wells. Natural recharge occurs from the infiltration of surface runoff near the mountain 15 fronts of the Santa Catalina and Tortolita Mountains and the stream beds of the Big Wash, Canada Del Oro Wash and small washes in the area. Current water demands supplied by withdrawals of local groundwater resources have outpaced groundwater recharge, resulting in a local water deficit. It is estimated that the average annual recharge from the local mountain fronts and stream channels total about 6,000 to 7,000 acre feet less than the amount withdrawn in 2002. Over the past several years, dry conditions (drought) have persisted with less than normal precipitation and runoff. Not only has the drought resulted in less recharge, it has caused a greater demand for water, which further exacerbates the current deficit. As a result, marked water level declines at wells have been experienced. Rates of decline over various time periods are provided in Appendix D. The largest rates of decline have occurred in the central east portions of Oro Valley's water service area, which has the largest concentration of high capacity wells. Demand for water in Oro Valley has increased significantly since its incorporation and have more than doubled within the last ten years. Continued growth is expected for Oro Valley; however, at a slower rate than we experienced from 1990 to 2000. Current demand projections for the 2030 — anticipated build-out date of the service area — approach 17,000 acre feet per year. Over this period, alternative water resources including effluent and CAP water will supplement groundwater resources to meet demands. Appendix D includes figures that illustrate Oro Valley's current (2002) and future (2030) water demands, along with the available renewable water resources corresponding to these time frames. Static groundwater level measurements taken in January and February of this year indicate an average decline of 6.3 feet. Current system demand coupled with less than average rainfall over the past three years is a large contributor to the falling levels. Detailed information on the individual wells may be found in Appendix D. During a routine review of the Oro Valley Water Utility's Assured Water Supply (AWS) Designation in late 2001, the Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR) found that the Town's service area population had grown much faster than anticipated in 1995. Concerned that we were approaching our original 10-year population projections several years early, ADWR recommended the Utility apply for re-designation as soon as practical. Based on this recommendation, the Town contracted with Brown and Caldwell during FY 2001-02 to prepare a new AWS Application, including the required hydrology report, for submittal to ADWR. As part of their review, the State looks to see that the water provider can meet three basic criteria prior to issuing an AWS designation: 1.) physical availability of water supplies; 2.) acceptable (potable) water quality; and 3.) financial capability. In order for the Town to prove the physical availability of water, we must demonstrate that sufficient local groundwater resources are physically available for the proposed water uses for the next 100 years. To this end, Brown and Caldwell has produced a hydrology report (Assured Water Supply Hydrology Report for the Oro Valley Water Utility) that describes Oro Valley's water demand, supply, and adequacy. 16 The scope of work for the hydrology study included demand, supply, and calculated physical availability of groundwater resources for 100 years. Elements of demand include the compilation of past, current, committed, and projected water demands for the Oro Valley Water Utility, other major water providers, and other water users within the study area. Elements of supply include an evaluation of the current hydrogeologic conditions to assess local groundwater resource availability. Elements of adequacy include analyses to quantify water level impacts in 100 years. In June of 2002, Brown and Caldwell completed and submitted the hydrology study and AWS application to ADWR for their review. To date, we have not received a response from ADWR regarding the status of our application; however, we anticipate a favorable response in the near future. Once ADWR approves the hydrology study, they will publish legal notice of their intent to issue our AWS designation and conduct the required public hearings. Once the ADWR Director is satisfied that all public comments have been adequately addressed by the Department, he will issue the Oro Valley Water Utility a new AWS designation. In the meantime, our current AWS designation remains valid. REVENUE REQUIREMENTS Water Utility Enterprise Fund: The Commission and Town staff analyzed the revenue and cash flow requirements necessary to operate and maintain the system, funds needed for capital improvements and debt service payments on outstanding bonds. Revenues and cash flows were projected for FY 2003-2004 based on anticipated annual growth in the customer base of 400 residential customers and water consumption patterns similar to CY 2002. Projected operating expenses were developed by the water utility staff. Capital expenditures will be funded with water rates and depreciation. The following table indicates the amount of water sales revenue that would be realized by a 2% revenue increase and increased service connections of 400: FY 2002-2003 FY 2003-2004 Dollar Revenue Estimate Revenue Projection Increase 000 $143,000 �8 381 $8,238,000 , Connection Fee Fund: In October of 2000, Mayor and Council approved the sale of$6,770,000 in bonds to finance three years of growth-related infrastructure. During FY 2003-2004 the last of the scheduled projects will be completed. All impact fees collected are pledged to repay the debt. To continue to have growth-related infrastructure in place prior to the demand, it will be necessary to continue to finance the costs. It may be prudent to re-finance the existing debt and increase the amount of the debt to finance future infrastructure. 17 The utility is in the process of updating the Potable Water System Master Plan (PWSMP) as a result of the slow down in residential and commercial growth, where the growth is actually taking place, and the resulting changes in infrastructure requirements. Thus, the CIP as shown is subject to change. Upon completion of the PWSMP update, the existing impact fees will be evaluated to determine if the fees are still adequate for projected debt service. The Commission will forward a recommendation on impact fees to Mayor and Council at that time. The five year CIP may be found in Appendix E. Alternative Water Resource Development Fee Fund: Alternative water resource development fees are collected for each new connection to the potable water system. These fees have not increased since they were originally adopted by Mayor and Council in 1996. Completion of the Reclaimed Water System Master Plan (RWSMP) will help the utility evaluate infrastructure needs and related costs and substantiate the existing fee or justify increasing the fees. To date, there have been no capital expenditures from this fund but during FY 2002-2003 design engineering costs for the Phase 1 Reclaimed Water System were paid from the fund. The timing and estimated costs to construct the Reclaimed Water System are detailed in the five year CIP which may be found in Appendix E. 0 & M AND DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS Because of the timing of the preparation of this report relative to the Town's budgeting process, the Commission recognizes that both the projected revenues and the projected expenses may need to be revised. The amounts shown below and used in the financial analysis may differ from those included in the Department Budget Request and the Manager's Budget Review because of the availability of more recent and reliable information. The Commission understands that OVWU staff, the Town Manager and the Mayor and Council will adjust expenses to fit the final estimate of revenues based on the action of the Council on the rate structure for FY 2003-2004. The following table is a comparative summary of expenses and debt service requirements for • ' Budgeted amounts for FY 2002-2003 are compared the water utility enterprise fund. to the 2 3-2004 used in the financial analysis: projected expenses for FY 00 2 2-2003 FY 2003-2004 OAU FY 00 Change Budget Projected Increase Decrease • Expenses gIncrease(Decrease) Personnel $1,583,942 $1,631,461 $_47,519 $2,115,301 $2 186 680 $ 71,379 • 4 7 $ 343 700 ($291,287)C.A.P. $ 63 ,98 fa C.A.G.R.D. $ 160,100 $ 258,746 $ 98,646 Deprec. & Amort. $1,601,600 $1,850,031 $248,431 Interest Payments $2,088,687 $2,044,309 ($ 44,378) Principal Payments $1,294,940 $1,350,610 $ 55,670 Totals $9,479,557 $9,665,537 $185,980 • • 18 Personnel costs include no new employees but are projected to increase by 3% to fund projected annual COLA/Merit increases. The request for operations and maintenance costs reflect, among other items, increased expenses for electrical power for pumping, water recharge costs, excess groundwater withdrawal fees, chemicals for disinfection, plant and equipment repairs. Some costs are fixed by outside agencies and others may be subject to change as the iterative process of budget development is completed. Principal and interest payments reflect debt service pursuant to bond repayment schedules for the bonds related to acquisition of the utility; assuming management of the OVWID#1; the bond issue in FY 2000-2001 for existing system improvements; and the acquisition of CAP water rights. The substantial increase in depreciation is due to the completion of approximately $6,000,000 in infrastructure during the past year. Since this new infrastructure has been put into service, it must now be depreciated over the expected life of each facility. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS Potable Water System: This past year, the OVWU was active in constructing new water system capital improvements for both the existing system and expansion related projects. By June 2003 it is anticipated newly completed projects totaling more than $6 million will be on line providing service to our customers. Capital improvement projects include one new well; two new reservoirs with a total capacity of 1.4 million gallons; four new single and dual zone booster stations; and 21,000 feet of new water mains in varying sizes. z ''*.i..: _' ' .t The new well was drilled to a depth.of ., `'' . ` :"' t �,-; 800 feet and will be ui ed to rovide _ .. r�.�. t.� � ____ � q pp p _, : . ,,, ,t r ...,:4,4: t : - a capacity of 400 gallons per minute. y - -� • '�" _ - This additional groundwater supply will 744 - ` rt., ,.._.:_. - help the utility meet peak day demands. 1r- , ""' - +, .jam ' y • ` ` .. ...- t.4*; ' — ., ' ,-,..... ..., -7 - ! ___ci.,..„,,,,,.. _ ...:-.4.: A,:. .. ...,..„ , ..., .. _ • .. . ., . ., ,.• iii,-.:-....,---.. ' t•:-. . , ..,, . __. •, . ....,, • t , •: - ‘4;_,,.. .,, .,_ .. , , .. . ... .----____. ....i..-,- , -- J '7 '• .h {, r -iQs a�, • ..:{�. • ~ WP#4 Well Under Construction 19 The two new reservoirs are above ground steel tanks. The reservoirs will provide operations stability and enhance the utility's ability to provide reliable supply for fire flow and peak demands in the "D" and "G" zone water ` • / • service areas. ` -� _�,,. + . �I, t •S. _fc• _ s • _• , •' _ as - • t- 41,) r * 74-11.1, 4( TMS j '•41y• ♦ •� �` - . Reservoir at WP#14 S • s fik • • • fir` 1 rte,i var. ; y. r, { .-. - �.."�' ,+ tfir- ' .,`•'�� : �.�}. - f'�r',��.� .�. • -z�•e"Q<• �'��' •fir.' �"�-�-' .�: rt�►� • igEWIIIPPoormai +• mma .'•�as�n }" !mer.•r = -..� .1 — 40. R" w.aa.rw.+,s...rw•,,.ra..: a..•t-".."!-;t+*.a aKsrr.►+s srr ..........r. a . � ' ' � � ;�• •t ' SII s+i. r/ 4 • CP\ •e..,#air..`. _ 7=7-. _ y _ -•em. ' ,,, .. .7 • -- -• :�." a�.- fir' `..".*" -,K,.' iy � 1 r�• - .� �;�,� f. -- 4=.i - - =4 - A . . # •- t r � `y. •}t• •`; •4' ...••+G,}i0.,;6.,A ,7`n Pe ►•..' Booster Station at WP#14 The four new booster stations will enhance the utility's ability to move water throughout the ft distribution system from the lower elevations to the higher elevations delivering the required • water volume and pressure. Design of the booster stations includes a feature which allows for maintenance of the pumping units without any downtime of the station. r The new water mains are ductile iron and are the arteries of the water system. Water mains move water from the supply source through the booster station and into the water service areas. The mains vary in size and range from 8"to 16". All of the new plant facilities have been designed and constructed with SCADA(Supervisory • Control And Data Acuisition) equipment. SCADA equipment has become the standard for utilities and allows utilitystaff to control and monitor the facilityfrom a remote water • 111 20 location. SCADA equipment has dramatically increased the utility's ability to identify, respond and correct a problem in a timely fashion significantly reducing the number and duration of water interruptions to its customers. As discussed previously in this report,the Potable Water System Master Plan (PWSMP) is in the process of being updated. It is anticipated that the five year CIP as detailed in Appendix E will change upon completion of the PWSMP. Reclaimed Water System: The Reclaimed Water System Master Plan (RWSMP) was approved by Mayor and Council in September 2002. The RWSMP identified the capital improvements required to receive reclaimed water at Tangerine Road and Thornydale Road and deliver it to the golf courses and schools within the Town of Oro Valley that are located north of Tangerine Road. The capital costs slated for FY 2003-2004 include completion of the design engineering for Phase 1 of the reclaimed system; construction of a 1 million gallon reservoir, two pump stations and transmission and distribution mains. Details of the capital improvement plans may be found in Appendix E. Funding sources for all capital projects include water rates, depreciation, bond proceeds, impact fees and the proposed Groundwater Preservation Fund. The following table summarizes the utility's five year CIP: Oro Valley Water Utility Five Year Capital Improvement Program 5 Year C.I.P. FY 03/04 FY 04/05 FY 05/06 FY 06/07 FY 07/08 Total Existing System $ 2,377,000 $ 1,390,000 $3,027,000 $1,361,000 $1,091,000 $ 9,246,000 Expansion Related $ 420,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 900,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 2,320,000 Reclaimed System $ 3,935,000 $9,420,000 $1,007,000 $2,360,250 $7,065,750 $23,788,000 Total $ 6,732,000 $11,810,000 $4,934,000 $3,721,250 $8,156,750 $35,354,000 RECOMMENDATION ON POTABLE WATER RATES, FEES & CHARGES The Commission recommends modification of the monthly base rates and the commodity rates to further encourage water conservation and to provide the revenue necessary to meet projected expenditures. The usage thresholds in the commodity rates will remain the same. A 2% revenue increase for the Potable Water System Preferred Financial Scenario is proposed to be accomplished via the following changes: ➢ The monthly base rates to increase by 2% and range from $12.25 to $1,224.00 per month depending on the meter size. 21 Rate Design RS-3 will not produce sufficient revenue, but the utility would be able to meet its revenue requirements by reducing its costs proportionately. Under this design, customers would experience varying rate increases depending on the volume of water used. However, rate design RS-3 does not promote a "cost of service" rate design which is the utility's ultimate goal. The Potable Water System Preferred Financial Scenario recommendations result in modification of both the base rates and the commodity rates. The average consumption for customers with a 5/8"x 3/4" meter is approximately 10,000 gallons per month. The proposed modification of the rate structure will further encourage water conservation of the utility's customers whereby usage in excess of the annual average usage for each customer class is penalized with higher rates. The Commission's recommended rate design is intended to encourage voluntary conservation practices. For comparison purposes, the following table provides a calculation of a monthly bill amount for a 5/8"x 3/4" meter for several of the other water utilities surrounding the Oro Valley Water Utility service area. Direct comparison of raw base rates and raw commodity rates is not as effective because of the varying rate structures of each utility. A better comparison is to calculate the cost for specific consumption levels during a summer month. Cost for Cost for Cost for Cost for Water Utility 10,000 Gallons 18,000 Gallons 27,000 Gallons 40,000 Gallons Oro Valley Current 31.00 49.80 72.25 111.25 Oro Valley Proposed 31.45 51.85 76.20 118.45 MDWID 29.24 46.52 68.88 115.94 Marana 34.40 57.35 80.30 113.45 Tucson 19.12 52.51 103.52 206.42 As previously described, the proposed revenue increase would allow the utility enterprise fund to meet sound financial criteria regarding the operations of a municipal utility while costs keep pace with inflation, growth issues are not ignored, infrastructure is replaced as it is worn out and the level of service to the customer improves. Review of the utility's service fees and charges revealed the existing hydrant meter deposit is not sufficient to recover the utility's cost to replace a lost or broken meter. The Commission is recommending that the hydrant meter deposit be increased from $750.00 to $1,200.00. Hydrant meters are used to measure water taken from fire hydrants for construction purposes. Refund of the hydrant meter deposit is predicated upon return of the meter in satisfactory condition and payment of the contractor/developer's final bill. Details of the proposed fee are located in Appendix H. Additionally, the Commission is recommending that the utility implement service fees for new development plan review and construction inspection. Other municipalities assess these fees from developers to recover their labor costs for this work. These fees would be new to the OVWU; however, establishing the fees is in keeping with the policy that "growth pays for itself'. Implementation of the fees will provide a revenue source that will offset 23 personnel costs and help minimize future rate increases. It is recommended that fees for construction inspection be based on the linear feet of main that is inspected. Proposed fees for construction inspection increase in 500 feet increments with 500 feet being the minimum. The fees range from $365.00 to $2,345.00. The fees for hydraulic plan review and design/construction plan review will vary depending on the number of pages in the plan set. Hydraulic review fees will range from $155.00 to $230.00. Design/construction review fees will range from $200.00 to $235.00. Both fee schedules include two reviews. Additional reviews will be charged at $85.00 per review. Details of the proposed fees are located in Appendix H. No other adjustments to service fees and charges are necessary at this time; however, the Commission recommends that the service fees and charges continue to be reviewed on an annual basis. FINANCIAL SUMMARY Retained earnings are the cumulative measure used by enterprise funds to determine the amount of earnings remaining after expenses are deducted from revenues since the inception of operations. Using assumptions in the Potable Water System Preferred Financial Scenario, the following table represents the projected retained earnings at June 30, 2004: I 6/30/2003 6/30/2004 Estimated Retained Earnings Net Income (Loss) Projected Retained Earnings $2,433,929 $479,239 $2,913,168 The utility is projected to have positive retained earnings of $2,913,168 at the end of FY 2003-2004 under the Potable Water System Preferred Financial Scenario. Maintaining positive retained earnings is an important element of the financial criteria used to guide staff in arriving at proposed revenue increases. The retained earnings accumulated since 1996 has reached a significant balance given the • utility's goal of matching revenue and expenses to operate at a "break even" point. Depreciation funds are used to meet debt service requirements on bond financed capital projects. Rates have been increased to allow the utility to maintain a positive cash flow when • golf courses are removed from groundwater and to provide contingency funds for emergency repairs. These have contributed to the retained earnings balance. Another contributing factor is approximately $432,000 in equity obtained from the dissolution of the IGA between Oro Valley and MDWID in FY 1998-1999. Also, in past years actual growth exceeded the projections which were accompanied by a drier climate that produced more revenue than anticipated. As this cash is used to finance capital improvements, the retained earnings • balance will decrease. IP +► Cash flow is an analysis of all changes that affect the cash account. The following table Aft reflects the estimated cash balances at June 30, 2004: 24 41 6/30/2003 6/30/2004 Estimated Cash Balance Change in Cash Balance Projected Cash Balance $5,788,360 ($1,398,340) $4,390,020 The cash balance is estimated to decrease by $1,398,340 at the end of FY 2003-2004. The projected cash decrease is largely attributable to the use of cash on hand to finance capital improvements and debt service. CONCLUSION The Commission presents this annual report for the review and consideration of the Mayor and Council. The Commission is available to discuss this report in greater detail at a joint study session or other appropriate forum. The Oro Valley Water Utility Commission is proud to serve the Town of Oro Valley and the customers of its water utility. Much has been accomplished in the sixth year of the utility's operation. The Commission extends their appreciation to the Mayor and Council for their consideration and guidance and looks forward to their continued direction on issues discussed in this report. 25 APPENDIX A POTABLE WATER PREFERRED FINANCIAL SCENARIO O CO CO 0) 0) o CO ,r r- N CO CO O 00 O 0) CO N CO C3) O N r. co COO ti O O N if). Ef3 Er)- N- O N O O 00 N- N O N T- CO- i N O CO N ,- I,.- CD O N to VI- Eft OCD LO CO O o CO v. 0) N CO O O E- ON CO- CO- N N O LOON COO CO U O ,= O oo ftHUI Ef3 ft (09- I-- 0 w CC ON (N r- CO o C v. CO CO V' CO o Ci 0 CO N CO O d O CO N a N it)N 0) 0) 00 CO CO- Ce Ce (9 O W N Z Ea cry E)- • U O = Z ce Q Q �Q o Z 0 W �- V' CO N N CO O > w W re O N O O O �' N Cl (/) > N 0) 0 CO- N J:::, - M 0 W r co d' CO CO I-- Q x- N Ce . 0 Vt UN �O Z Z 64 Ef3 Ef3 Z LU E �, - w >- Ce m ° v- w o o u- Q C� W C J ce w Q O Q D _c Q Q � w � Z c O a) ° a, Cn Q Q 0 u.. Cn • �. Z V) Z 0 : 0 0 c6 L 0 O v)• = 0IZ vo) I- Z UQ Z 0 0 c CoN N N d' O O '- CO CO ,- 0 0 '-- d• d' O CO O ,- LU 0 Lo CO N- tt LO '- 00 p 0 C d- 0"CO CO - O) '- O) f- N O O N CV - 0 0 0 0) CO 0 N- '- r- O Ln CO �- O C 0 Lo 0 r- CO I� d- I� O O O O N N CO O O O 0 N- O d' Lo N CO O's 0 O '- N- CO CO O d- CO O) O) Lo O d' CO N O) d' O O) 00 CO CO O Ll) 00 '- O Co (-Ni i-- >- O in N- (NI co ti in 0) co Lo Lo (3) CO Lo CO CO O '-- d' O) O) 0) O LU d` 0 U. 0 '- Lo CO O ' d- N- CO ,- CO d- r- 00 CO CO Lo 0 0 CD '- CO h.- OO r- CX) O ,- cNi N ,- 0 H H 0 0 N ,- '-- N N- CO '- CO CO d" O O d' N O O CO O N 0) O d- d" ti ti '- O) N- p 0 W O N- is--) CO O 2 CO - Lo C O d- O O d- d- O) 00 O O d" d- O N O - N QO N- Co 0 CoCe O W. CO N- Lo d- O O d' N- N- CO O O CO N N- N r- O) CO 0) O - O co-co O N O d• N CO �- u O O N O ,- d• O ,- CO co-N O O 1` r- (Ni O N CO d' N- d- 0) CO CO co co Co Co O N- r- N- N- d- N d c0 Cr) 0 U. O ' d- N 00 ' d- Lo cr) 0) ti Co CO N CO d- v co CO s- N N- N- ,-- 00 00 A N A CO N '- Q a coCe 0 N CO CO CO Lo �- N- N- N O O N N- N- 0 CO O 0 Lo N O N- CO to 00 0 `Q d Z N- L) O N O CO r- CO O O O O O ,- d- CO O O d- CO O ,-- d- CO d- N CO d- O Co 0 CO 00 O O) - N- O d- 00 O O CO CO d- N- O O 00 d- N- N N Lo 0) CO 0) O }' Z 0 O Ln N d" ' d' NI N CO N- Ln O N M r- CO d' O N d- CO Ni L(7 N- a) CO CO N '- O d' 00 O) N N- CO 0) CO Lo Lo d- O r- N CO O r- '- O) CO 0 CO '- 0 V Z LL O '- CV '- CO ,- d- CO CO N- N- CO r- 00 N CO CO CO ,- N CD N Q ." N r- c0 00 - N ' CO N N--- LI U- LU W < C) Co N '- N CO N c7 '- CO N O O N Lid CO 0 O CO 00 O O O) CO Lo CSO Cop o0 0 W o C O O O) Lf) N 1 CO 1,:i O O N- O N d' O O N- O O V' N 0) N CO O O 0 COO CO O) N N- CO N O O N `� CO 0 N- CO N- Lf) 0) c7 U O N O 00 N d' '- Cl0 Lo O cr) O d" Lf) O N N CO c7 N O O Lo d` N Z }- O d' d- N '- N-- N O '- COLf) LO dO N '- A• �-- CO 0 CO d- N ZLA. O '- '- '- d' N CO co O CO N CO '- CO COLf) Lo N- N Co_ W I: t� '- C6 O) N ' CO ("4 0 S N W W F- Q 0 W 0 N N N CO '- 0) CO O O CO '- O O O c0 cO O CO o0 o0 d- Lo v) p 0 O < 0 M O 8 NN- N- N- CO rO- O O O Co CO N O cO 0) 0 d- ,- d- 00 N CO V- N- 0) O r- 00 N- N- CO Ln CO 0) N 0 O E2 z O O C'O cr d- O O Lc> O d- 00 ti O O cr oO O crN CO O) N 0 '- O d' CO O N- '- CO Lo LO 0) CO h. O d- d"Lo N- N CO N N- Q Z 0 W LL 0 '- N '- CO CO ti CO CO CO N N _ _ W V Z ti N- r- C)O C)O '- N_ r- CO N C» 0 v) I-- Z Cn z 4.-7,. O = - ,- U I:::tU a _ � _-- 0 CC cn F—CD i: w U p >- r n o .c OCA � O �j o OAC U � 0 fw zC �- cn �-- C _ 0 w W O CC o 0) ° O fxO QOL L � Z 6U _ �, � zw w � Cl- U) O � oW E 00 - D p Z Cr Cr J W O 2E Z Z x 0 a c 2 Z p O p w < N w "r)(/) O > UI-. � tLw > Z °5uj 0 _ Z :5 LU CC Cn W ZD0NZ � 0 LUQ. *k 0 N H � QQQ www zv � �-" � `L U-'cl w > < W W XWWpW � � Cn WI WOp � QO Z 0 H- f— Z zF- t-- O — - 0 co O Ecr - H H �U U � U -, W W D � W z— L-1-1 > WW W W � z 0 0 < 0 U) WZZUZZWWOZww Cl) QOQ O ~ OD W W U) W � � UW J � 0sa_ a_ Q � QF- Z W• g z0000 > ww �•�- > z0 � Z �sv� cnZWW � UW ii. 0 Q0N > CLCCCLCCfy � � O � WZO a � z � � 0 .JJ (nza O mm Z W VO I.LLLILLL > E- W 00 ~ QQw WO 0 WW � Z � o rxwwww < 00OQwi' Wz - 00 - zzwou) J Z op U U O O LL C F. Z ›. > > > > F- I— ZI- Upp QQ W WCIN � eZZZZ0UUpp � W (90Q � OCw - - OL W1�- (D ZZ A CI — JWe- 7 W W WW W WF- V- U CnF-- WfX Zu) CL cyF- � U0a0 z OO LU W Q (~j -0 � Lu --» cnm = w � ccLU CL 3 -aa. 001— i_- � 5 Q D > W L °' Z > � tYCCCCCUn00 � cUn0z W0_ 0a_ a_ 0 < < 000 Z Z c w O 0 0 3 > W W 1-- i- > 0a aix et 0 0 z CO CC i- 0 O 0 0 H Vo aomLUN - coo ooDo LU - co mo 8Q w N- c0MNM ooLno LUM M N o 0 Cea) M oo O M N- coco O O o a) N M �n O CO CO N N O 1� O O CO ..-. 6 CO (-Ni 6 >- 0 0 o) LO N N LO N- M M O LO O O LJ M M r N- ,,- r- N CON- C\1 CO r- N Q ,- N d' ,- (I) a. Q• Z N. ti M LO M 0) r- 00 O O 00 O ,- a) 00 1` O o CO - N- 0) N 0) ,- O O O MN- O N O O w —• C r- ti LU O 0) CO 'I' CD O CO 0) CO O) 0) �: d" CD ZN- 1.00 ,—,--- 1.-- m O (n t,C) CO N- CO N }- O) M - O co N- 0) O CO N 00 VW O I < LL N M I- N r O r- CO r- N d' CO ,- CO Q _ ,- N 4' r- M W LL W ' < 0 wLoMLna) Ooa) a) oOoO N- co LO o 0 W O 00 - L N O CO O O CO O �t N LO C O M C3) CO CO M 00 O O CO 0) 0) CO 00 ,_ V- O CO CO CO d) CO N- N' Ln C3) CO C7) M (3) N 01-- >- OCO - ON- r- N 1`... L0 ,-- 0° MN- M Z Z U. N M N N O Ln r- N d' CON CO CV ,- M 0 E N W W Q o m C N M LO N CO r- d- O O N O LO CO CO N O o O W 4 LO O 00 Oo O 00 r- O 0) N- mM O O O QD LU - NN- NMt` OOr- O) N d- • `d" O O M N. t() O O co-CO O In N Q O N CO N �t M M LO 'Tr- 00 CO 'q CO Z O W LL LO M T- N N a) tt 1.0 .‘- N '4- N- N CO W O ,- �t CO U > O (i) H- Z o 0) M CO CO LO r- C3) 0 0 0 0 �t O O O CO r- 00 00 N M 1` O O O WN -- N O O O N M CO M 0) O LO O O N- a) CO a) a) '�t O C7) M 00 CO O CO CO CO N- CO N }- 1� r- N N N L.O N- N M O 00 CON- 0) LL "fi d- r- N N 00 M LU r- N t t- N CO Z F- F- W Z Z W W W o W w DW oW W W W WW Z - 0 �Sfnn c`v W_ — 0 '- 0 r = Q O OzW P- Zz Q ° F- IL- ZQRC� m0 oz � W mOQ � � �- w °'� � w 0 MU > �- � � � w > o � CSU CD O MM gc/) QONF— QI EY MW Q O N F- O r- w W w co W Cl) W W W W W Z Z Z Z WW 0 > 0 ~ mN ZZZZo� O WWWW WW O F- Q Q w � WWWW m � � � � wW w (I) W 0 M o a. a_ a_ a_ z 0 < < < < a_ a_ m W D U V 0 W ONT WWWWWOw a_ a_ a_ a_ WW m > o z J r' N O F— F— F— F— Q J Q Q Q <C F— F— W CI W L W Q v 013 UwwwwwQ a. a_ a_ a ww U) <H z > --) ca y zccccccrxixJ 0000 cccr < E.- W O 0m3 Hwwww0Q zzzz ww 1, m F. > cem L m w F— F— F— F— w > OC F— ~ O w W W O aaW zZZZZo < a_ a_ a. a_ _z z 1- C3 w cc Co to A- C) r- in O O O O CO O CO O O 0) 0) 0 0 CO (N O O) 0) O O C) O CC) LU CO O O LU to - O N. I— O O Co co O O O OLU 0) in O O 00 N O 0 co0) CO O O O r- 4. O O O N - - co to CO 0) O (o CO 0) Ln d- CO LO LO I` V- 0 LLr L I` CO 0) N O r--- LO c1' CO I� I- H 0 N. L d' O CO CO O O O O O CO CO O O L V' 0 0 LU L V' O (N N- O O O O CO V" O O O CO O O CL O N0 0 O O O O O co 0) O O l•-• N O O c6 ii- 00 co- 0 0 0 0 I` RO 6 00 N 0 >- CO CO L CO O Lc) co CO N Imo- Vt LU LU LL. CO to cO I` CC) CO 00V' N- I,- - A-. OS N- r- QNrA- CL Ce Q Z co N O CO O 0 0 0 0(n 0 t i O O I.0 O 0 0 V' 0 0 CO ,- 0 0 0 0 N- CO In O O to 0) - O LU - CD N CO O 0) - O O O O to N CO C) O N CO O }' O O N- LU I` to O O O N- co-CO CO O O CO N N z Z >- 0) co LU CO O to CO N O CO V to Ln OD 0) I < U. 0) CO CO CO O O `�C3) CO CO Q z Ch C6 4' C'7 r- CO W W Et Q Co O O N O C)) d' O O O C) r-- N CO O O in 0 0 W N ti O CO N O O O O ti CO O O V' CO O C O CV O to N- O O O O V O V O O NOD O O clivi R to 0 0 0 01.60 to O O O CO N V• /- >- 0) O to N- N- O Ln CO O) I- C3) CO to to 0) CO Z Z U. CO CO CO lf) N- co "a) CO-- -4-- co 0) CO - _ _ _ _ _ _ co- N W I W I. CO 0 o CO o N- 0) o 0 o rn o a) O o O o0 0 c O Qp O COOoO co 000 O ,- O O N c0 .q O M co - O in 0) O O O ' co CO 0) O O O O O R z O CX) O) t o 0 I, O O tet' O r- O O O CO N Q O >- co co (0 N n L r- N- LV' In ti LO Ln 0) CO W LL N- CO CO V' r- O N O CO I` CO CO (Si CX) fit' O N N ,- (f) �t WUO �. C) > (n I- Z (n W_ ca cn W_ P. 0. W H 5 � v u) > U W .. Cnu) z H < I- v wDD � Q 0 06 w °X' ~ www 0 z J I V ca I- — > > Z 0 I- > < z Cv �- W W C� t-- a - W U � z < z < U Z o Q a cL H w — 0 W 0 W W Q Q W ~ ca I I- a zHIW 0 � p z w 0 1- ��-- Q - >- -I p I- > `�- � w Q5. Ow m < 1- z Li._ z ° o 7.i (I) U W2 2 � 0 H-ri � � U) 0 W c*" c � O < Cl)w � � p < Ua WztW V) Z m CX p J ---I O W CC LL 0 0 5 U) W 0 W - Q I-� CO Ct WI m 00 0 W0 z20 r---- I- W W Z W U) I- = N I OWWw OF- zW � >- W >_ O W p Q Q < o ( cc » w 0 ccz fx0s X < 0 F- cc > 2 W vMo < '-Lww � 5 �- wp � w � > Q 0 0 L U) wow, ° 0 Www < W � WU) WWCi) C4 O � W aa.. z 5 v z JW � � p LULU < a > 0) ZWwa- az w = W C� w JUAN Z- - 2II (_ 9Oo3io 0CL CO 1- W F- LU > W Z w cr) v) W Q u_ H 0 i W Z Q Q LL LU < Q Ce < z W Q W cx U Z 2 0 2 I W '� to — 2000 0 22 z _ O0O �3 C.9 cnUUU i_ cr) — 2 > — w LT w - I- Cl) Q 1-= > O aa.. atY m < z < z 0 Z 0 0 W CC • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• APPENDIX B • • • • RECLAIMED WATER SYSTEM PROFORMAS • • • • f • • • • • • • a • • • • • • • • 410• • • • • • • • 40 CO O O 00 O Co O CO O r- CO to 0) co O O CD 0 .V." CO O O CO e•- M O r- to N- 00 00 CO O O M h• O CO U) (0 (0000001,- .4- O CO CO O O d' O Co ,- 4t to M CO -t (-4 N to Co C3) CD t` O 4 N Co co ..- co a) co r- 4 co O) CO cV O CO to ‘- CO to CO CO O N -I- >- N e- M r- e- e- M Ea Efi Oft to Ma) O O Co co O O Co O) ,- Q) a) U) d' O O .,. C) O O E3) O O N- 0) N- CO O OD N O N tet' O Co C) N N C) a) CON- .0 1.0 O O O d• to C N N r- N Vt r' N -4- N O N Cn O N N a) U) a) to co r- a) O Co 4 N- N O r- ‘CO_d- ,- C)) to Co 00 r- co co LL. - M r-- e- r- M Ea Eft ea- ER Nt` O O t` CO tet' O o0 Cr) e- E3) 00 tO N O V- OO r V- O O ,f co oo O co N- t` C7) d- N- N- O e- N O O N 0) to O 00 00 1,- O e- tf) tp O O 4 cis CO O o0 R N M O N d' CO R CO O ON N co co O Co a) N r- CO 4 M N N- r- CO r- t- a") a) CO N ict >- e- e- (- e- e- e- M u. Ef3 to (A ER e- O O O CO CO O 00 N e- O O O O O O O !i O CO O O CO e- e- O CO M N- 0 CO CO M O O O CO O CO V- CO CO O N- O 1` O O O O 4 e- t- O O o0 to u5 oO M 00 N V N N N i. O O N N tet' O CO Co N CO CO N- 0) O N N ‘-- CO 1- tl-) V- CO N C')) cO >- e- e- Me- e- e- M U- Ef3 Ef3 Ef3 ER C) .0 CD .,- 0) O O O Q) CO O N CO V U) O U) O CO to C)) O O 0) N E7) O N- tom- 00 r- OO CD O O M Ci) O O V- 'd- N- CO O CO N N- C) -4- CO CO O O N C') N M 4 M t` N O) CY) tp OC3) N 4 t O CO ii- N ,- u-) a) N N. co N CO e-- e- O) r- N.- to V- M r N } e- e- N e- e- e- Cr) -c- u_ LL 0 to (A cd,) to iA 0 F--- O O O N O O N O co O N .- 'V' to N- V- E") O M tto E E . e- O to CO co d- O U) N Co e- 4 CO CO O CO to 0 t- N N- 00 O to V- CO 0) CO V- CO O O M Q O c:, d- O o0 M Ci N M CO N to N- N d to `«- N N N t3) CO C)) N O00 M N- CD N 0 O N Co e- e- C)) t` V- M to M e- N LL e- r N e- e- e- M i O C (A Ef3 (A iA to a) O Y }- COO N rX C3) O O O) O O O O) ti �- CO O gi cn O) O O O C)) N- O e- M to C3) O u) - N- O) C) ,- O O N- t7• r- Coa) O) e- C7) e- O O M U) Z P t- O O L6 a5 c5 c‘i D N e- e- D) ti U i O ---C- 2— N t1N to Moo O e- O) O CO M to ,v (Ni 00 e- e- — C o cv (NI oo f J >- - is 7 N e- e- M o CU W LL 2 C L C O a (A Ef3 (A EA 03 E ti o c O to O O to 1` CO O CO N 1` O to t- CO O OM CCD En M a) 9 ,- 0 0 e- M O O to e- to N- `� N O a) + L CD O N Co a) 1` 1- O to 0) 00 N- Vt co) O O M to O M O O ao N N r- N t` CO O '� N co E7) to M to C)) to V- a) CO CO En a) O E3) e-- O O N co N co M 0 OU u) >- - - e- M - N -0 >-,� U Ea Ea VI. ER cc) .-. CD 0 .-� C , t0 to O O to CD CO to N- N CO N- cD O O p _c C 5 ui C O O '4- a) CO co op co to N N aO M O `�- ..., to 00 O u-) CO M CO ao 0) O 0) C� N O O M 4) o to DO O M N d t` r '� r e- O '� CD u) U M OU co N 4 O tl) co oO e- a) 00 N o0 M 4 t� cV O) e- C)) (OV V- N o0 e- 00 N e- C : 03 U >- e- M LL to.o , a) (� Ea el Ell EA EO N cn \ o CnO O OO E n Q) co M0 O O O -a- Co t7) ET co M O co O CO E U >' -0 t7 ' O t� t� O O N O �_ O O M Efl a..� N C O to to N e- LO O U) e- C") EJ) a) N a) e- e- -4- Co to to O u) N C a) to N e- 0) e- e- e- 0) U) CO to tEs .- cu N t0 t� - a) tT5 a) d EV �- M •co-• U 03 U U w u) c (n n - - O (�q (A Eft EA - . - (U c N n g g t, a) O O O O CD (V Lc) O O to to tl) U) O CL O • rccn M ' O N N N ' N O O N ` g Om 3 p 7 O O O O O e- CP a) OL U n N e- to to to a) , D O Q) n tL a) - nO O (3 EfE3 414 OCO O wCn N CU L CO O -0 o OM > °ONto to .-- a) -EctitriQ.Ef3 O45 C T U (o W (A ` o N N 0 U to C d Co C = M a) gwu- m � � 3 -@ a) p LL O w N ...• M O O d N4 O C U a) asI- t0 U u) O U) til U) t0 o(A u) C O ›, w m p O a) a) --= a) u) n D cn C a) O O N a) u) rn� E E CA U OTi-- U ': (th C M (n (n R U._ i N �_ L n ,...,a) _J O O > L a) n O N Cl- i d L N n a) O w a) w c c)Q N t- cn E to r N -0 C a; CO O_ aCi E T E a) G O m 3 ° D 3 °5 C m co t° d m n 3 C�zs C C C J a) a O n c a) m e t j �' En o C0 Q o ami > a) o U axi >. .. a) > 3 a) a) O a) ca a) tI3 L- X E En �. U o .E c E E -� cn a) m ami -o E 2 > g c L E v E ' a) 0) w O o a ti c O a) m E .n L a) 63 L (ads N a� (toy o. ` 0 � N c� w U t E 2) a-) 0 o �) -C Q• ani �'• O `—° m fl. W N � o -a-, co a) 0 Nt c an-Cu a) 0w . uaCCQa_ a cC0w � E o o a) w> a - o o n� aCUwo o Cl. m a) = CL O C) O W a a CC t-- 0 E-- 0 E z am 0 < e= (v cfi 4 tri cii l` ao t)i Nr N CO O O N CD 0) CO N CD e. I,- CD O CD e- to CO A) CO d' C.) N I CD CO I- 00 CO N (D 'd' N- V O CD N CO oi O CIO I` N co -ct N CO CO 0) co .4. d ) ' C e- O ,- CO e- CO O e- N CO N Ne-- N el ff3 ch CO CD O CD O to N. N (N e- 1,-- 0) O CD r-- CO CO 0) 00 I` N CO •ft CDCO CD N CD to CO N O to O r- e- CD O CIO C>D N c N (NI N .0 CO CO co tT co N O e- CY) .-- CO e- CD N >- N ' V- N r- ' CV (f3 Eft N ti N. O CD CO-'0) CD CO N d- r. M dt CD CD N N. CD CO 1,- .4, `r tt N CD CD CO CD to e- CO CD OO (D r- CO I` ' CO O O CD CV N M CD I. r- M Vt N N ..- I,- '-- CO O r-- N CD N I- r- N e-- N LL Eft EA e- 1,-- CD CD CD O - O (V (V N- CO CD O CD N CO CO to CO CO O CIOCO O CO N NCD CO CD d- e N- O C5 e- Is- N CO CD O O CD CD N N N- I,- I- N- CD N N 1 CO CD '- N CD N e- } _ _ _ _ _ U- r- N r- N Ef3 ER • O M O O O M CO CD M N i` co CT O O r CD CD I,- CIO CO 0 0) M O CD tt co r- CD O CO O O tD O N N (-,ito co- -c- O o) C3) N Vt dt r- N N Nt CD 41 NCO '- r- CD O CO CD N N �' N.- N s- N 0 LL Ef) Ef3 va to N O O r-- CD M CO C CD r- O .0 LO .-- CD .- co 00 CO110 M U) O I` to N- .4- N CO CO C ti d' O CO M O N CO CD CD O CD N. N N CO CO I- N- cr. o) co0NCD co r CD CD CD N d _v • el Ef3 • CO CO CD CD CD tf) N. CD CO to ft CD CA O CD CO CO d O to Q 1` I` CD O �- O CD C7) to `V' CO • Z O OCI I� O CO r- M r- V- CO I� N- to ND C7) N CO CD CD N O C3) to r- (D CO CD 0 J > W a: EREf3 CL 1,-. to O O C"') N I- M CD CD Oi C3) '-- CD O e-- CD O '- CD to co d- CD N CD N- CO M I` c. r-: '-- •,-- O O O I` CD �t O • 0 CNt N CO CO CO to O CD N- N CD C D CD to to CO LI) M e- 0 Li- E9. EF). • CO „,t- toOOIT) O MO V- 9 N NT CD 0 CD CD CO N '- CD 0 to M CD CD to 0) M r- M co C (� M O M d) N O d' IT C S NO O O to .4. CD .t MCD U. r r iER Ef). 0 Lo O O CD O O ED ED CD to O O Imo- MCO (D to (N 4 N ' CD I,- �t (N CO N• (`') 0 CI O O Ll') r- O N 0) co N CD r CD to CO CD d- N to - CD '--' e' N CD co 0 U- .,-- •• Ea 6,1- ,t f3a O O CD O M . c)O N ' N ' ' ' N aO O O CD a 0 (V '- CO CO N '-- to i >- 0 U- Eft d9 11 a) a) a) • r”' > C-•> 0) ' a) w o + V d M CO N co > Cts OF E CD D u)ci) CT j D) NE as as5 hi N C (CI of c CO `n c a) m i CO 2 E E E O t`" Cu 2 ° CCI W ._ _a L y-- 2 2 O C `�- E E T 2 as N .h 0 -a O T c 0U- ..- „q! DDD �. ami '� a n- cn ai w ca m m m 'a v) a)�, ii �i Q v� a_ L _ . L c i L L .c Lcr) 3 Cts CU d as C N to CO CO CV C V L .� Q L CO (U Cts CO U L +-• '` o m o a) ( m U U U U a� n- O X a a m 0 z 0 z 0 0” • • • • • • s • • • • • • APPENDIX C • s • •• WATER QUALITY • • •• • • • s 9t • • • • • •• • f • • fa • • 1 • • 0 c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c z c c c c c c c c c c c c = c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c Q c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c U) c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c '''' < c c c c c c c c c c c c c = c c = c c c c c c c c c c c c = c c c c c c c c 0 E c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c -) c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c < c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c LL c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c -) c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c L 0 LO Q .� Cu Ya) M 0 L L W 7.-- as L a) ( = a) N U 1 LEt a) _c O o r N ►.. (LT D O o C CU (� a] CU -CD O O O O L?.. Q O O O O L U Q Q O +, Z C U O U O L C Z O E— Y C �+- (!� (n 1 N c `o o w o ca CCL — U L ;� `- p co p L p o o N L U .L O a) +-' CL C p O O C U a) N O N v `. p o . U L a) o N a) J a) 1 m > al P o U i p m _ o o p C o o C co o C _0 L N o o M C 7) cu u) E E a) _U O /— O L O Cu N 1 L }' J 1 i C _ _ co `� `J O O ' O O C a) O W O /�� O ma �_ p •U (n Cp O L p _� Q -1 O •p., O r J I U a3 c O •> (� m U) !1 L 1 ■.. Y _� p L J L U _ _ �J _ = 0 o p aj RS E a) C O u) L L U N 0 ca U p a) 35 > a) U c W N. S' a) c N CD C as O O O as (II ++ ) o = U O p Q p >_ > cn cn _ a) N D.. a Rt o o CU m C 4-- f.„, a) _c •«- N �C 13 O _ p cB C1 a) W tT L N O C L Q O O C cn a) }.� -� u) p ca C coU L O M . L) 0 c0 O , C 2 Q to O r 1 O CO 2 J •N p ow E F- .II �n _ a� U o p LL r r O LR, czn O ,... .4-, o = U U co a) CO O 4 Z CL c CU o 0 W > C = —'• Cu as U .O r U 0 r • e-- (,) C t.,,'-- a) r 0 U) ,� CU _I Z W cn as as � � N � U O O � � � O C/) a- � � C M 2 .�. m O � fn a) to U CD CD CO a) a) CO x- 4-- O- `�- r14Y O i` O co c) CD p r CO 0 CO L O O 0 ca co 00 e-- Q O Lo b Lo N 22 J (cN co co Nr-N O O O 2 (1) a) ar co N Imo- c0 O CO ,- CD Cu d' • CD Cu • to N Cu N N O a) O L[) C Cu' U Z NI- CO Lc) to m Z '> ,.0 Q r a) CO r- Z Co m r > c-- U) r Q. W r > Z r C) r- LO U Z C r CN a) r r•l a) et 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 O O CD 0 0 o O O O 0 CD CD CD CCD CD CD .at 0-.._ o CO m U U U U U 0 0 0 0 0 w W w W W LL LL LL L. LL LL C7 0 0 0 0 0 _ = o .- co a) CO I` O (0 I` r M Lf) r- N �t co -f- Lc) CD N CO a) CO a) r- O r c") t[) (O I` (N v U U U U U U U c ... O O O O r- r- r- 0 0 0 r- r- O r- e- r- CO O r r N N CO N N N N N N (Ni N r N CO Nr In CO N.- 0 . as C 0 3.4 w+ Cu ��., 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O �' mi O O 0 co r r- r E 'L LO- I` CO N- I— I` I` CO I- I` LL LL LL I� I` N- I� I` I` I` N- o L. 4 F 'cccccc •d' (O (O (O (O (fl (o I.. Imo- I� Co (o (OcocoCoOCO r) cOo0 to to u) ccM to to (o (O CO Lo L caI` u� _ _ _ OO O O O O O .0at - - - N N - - N d' N V' Li) L O V d' Nt' r o p p .. MciMM >UU UN Iii N rrrrrrrr- rrO O) r0 WwWW0WWWWWWWWWW II. a) 0 5 W w w 7 r Lc; II O O II Or U C CO it a) - Q) CP O O O "a .I5 cc VI cc tcc .41) L() r r r to to to to to to O .41) (n r N_ N_ N_ N_ N N_ y q 'x N N_ N_ N_ N_ N_ N_ N_ O N rts co N to to t1- Lc) t1) to N N N Ln to L17 to tt) Lc7 L() L a) ..... N N N N v- N N O to t jj N N N N N N N (N L L L L L L L a) (� +�+ t` - ( Nt NtI (NI CN L17 Lc) t1") to tri t.L) N N N tt) to tt) Ln t17 Ln to to N a) a) a) a) a) a) o- C O LU • CO c") O CO- M O O N N N N M N N_ L. tri cc N N N N N N N N O O O O O O O N 'CC '+� O r r r rdtrLnLc0 toNNNts7Lc) Lc) nts) t17LL7 O OOOOOO ONii C� cy) cri - - - - - -- (O (O (O (O (OCONNN (O (O (O (OCOCOCOCO cnNNU) NcnNIC LOLON N N - N N O (p (p N N N N N N N NUUUUUUU~ O O O O N N N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OOO N N N N N N Na)tO 16 rrrry-• r N (13 cCa) O CU aU OOCOI` OCO I` O M to O00Oo0OrOMt1) CoI` N rN M Lo co I` C r-rrrr r r r r Cr) r- r- N N CO N N N N N N N N ii a) 0 CU CD CS > 0 .bpO w O 17.44 a) o0 o mmUUUUU0000c) wwwwwlllllllt- u_ Llc� c� c� c� c� c� = = — � � � � � � v N .1o < _ '. O F • • • 0 0 0 • • • 0 • • 0 • • O C C C +- J rn N o v 0) Ln v u) Ln OD 03 al Q W p p N O - M N M 6 6 -moi lvL () Z o Z p Q > W Z Ilki w Q w _ O O O J O N a) N V p r- O N Lo p N M CO O O co r` O N r`• W O O • O O O J -, 0 ,-- to CO CO N O o N 't N (D - p 0 N--- CO N N ,- ,- N CO CO 16 N N N Ct W J i F- CC < 0 O 1. Z O W Z Q O p N ` N o O O N CO. � O N N- to CO O D) r-- 7 k ` - O ,-Z • 11111 Q ZZZ p - p (9 ppNNr- C? A p01' CV O N O 4 - N t ? 1' w00 i 0 u) w 1 z 0 O O a w Z411 J U O O CO r- OD CID O O O O r- OO O CO ti N O O O O O 4 ti (13t` o Z W wH W Q m M N to 4 4 N O r: 00 �t C7 O N6 ..- co co Q) (D eL (p to 6 to CD to to 0 to CD M M M N M M M M M ,- O O CA lillh O Q J el el el CO el CO el CO el el CO CO CV N N N N N pN N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N a0 XIX w 1- w D w O w ( 0 Z O J 2 w F- U > W O CD N 0) N V 0 O CD •- �) N 0) O N CO U0 O O .- O '-- (D CO 4 co _ W r-- M to M t` CO r- ,- N N 4 M O 00 O 6 M OO Q -� W LLL N N N N M t` ti ti t` t` r� CO 0 N CO M �t -4' W H p N N N N N N r r- l- A- A- N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 I LL J 4111' 0 40, Z O Q) O N M CO N 0) 0 - N M O c") CO (C) co ti p 0) O r- N co LLL a0 CA O p O O 0 CA 0 0 0 0 (o ti ti i o0 CA 0 0 0 0 W ci Q Q C C C > -Q Q C C C C 2) > C �- f.- C 2) nIli C C C < O Z O a) a) a) (0 co cv (s a) co as a) C1 m a) a) co cv m 0 O ti' l� Z w w LL -) LL -) LL < --, w L1 -) --> Cn J CD CD 0 O O 0 0 O 0 0 O O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 O O W6 6 6 6 6 6 tCV 0 0 0 0 0 0 to CV CLc)V CV Ln to tf) to 6tf) Q --I Q 00 00 co 00 00 co N N N N N N .4- V -4- V V �f �f Q N N N N N N N N N N N N N t()Ln to LO to LO LO to a) a) In LO a LO J W • N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 w 0 W Q U OJ D D D D _J U_ DDDDD f- f- 1- H F- H F- 1- Q CC J J J O O O O O O O O > < J > > > > > J J > > > > > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > > > > > 0 0 0 0 0 0 - w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o CD O Lj- d 1-- O O w U----. v 0 " cocD r as O Zw -- - N Z co cD co Q 0 0 W J W O co JCOcoco J Q WW J O) W o > cc 0 l' J w W W W D > > > W I- 0 0 0 0 0 U D _ Cn < < < lb LL aLU W 0 Z Ct I-_ O N Z N O N U Q 0Q U 0 < - 5 _ w W W a LL a 0--L WCC `L' I- M Lu F- ir) M ct J > J ( N - cc)r (/)U > 0 (D N to O N in N a D tl) a) t- a)tr) co F- 6 u) I- > 0 # O H J cv 0 IX coJ O = 0 0 0 0 > rn Q CT) rn C C C f- J ao o CT) OD CD v CT) CD CD OD OO v (v (o (U E Q w u i (0 co c�i v v co . rn ai ZO z- I- Q u) > UJ Z W Q W O O O W 0 cL cL O C7 O co O O O O O co N N- D) O O O (fl O O O O O coco O � O O ti r- O O O Et J O T M N (V N t� N O O O M N CO O V O O p O N M V in CO N N N W J U 1 1 1 1 1 I-- CC Q o O Z O W Z r 0 QO OO V (D O O O) •c-- - M M (D r` p p O CO p pM OCO rf•-•- CO Zz LO 0..; Z O = O V `�' O r ( OrJ - . .- o p 0 0 � M Q D (/) F-- Z Z I O O d D — 0 (/) F- w O 0 _ CC U) Z J U O O O () O O O O O V- CD M , r- O O O V O O O O O N .:t O O CO O O CO (D CO ►- Z O ZU) W > I r: M M CO M O M M ca O •.- r` 00 I co O �- .- ao N (D (D •- CD r� (D co aO Cr W F- W < I I I I CO CO M M M M V N N M N N O (0 (D co N CD 0) O CC ~CL CC X O ¢ J N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N w D w O w CC U Z O J F- UwO >> O O O vO O oO ` coM O O O O co(D O O O O O COa0 CO(D O ti o o , v r� = F_ W ir W O O Cn •-- M M O N r� ti N 6 V M , co Q) O 6 V 4 r` N aO QO M N a0 r� r� 6 F- Q J 11r- O O o 0 0 o O CO O r r- CV CO CO CO CO CO r` CO CO O O O O = N N V CD V-- CO CL F- O - w N r- .- N N N N r- r- N N N N N r- ,- r' .-- ' r- N N N ,- = .- .- W CO N F- U) 0 = 9 J 0 Z M V- U) I r,- M a) O (D Q) O N co co , (D N r- CO 0) CD N- N M (D I Q) CD ,- N M W - f� M 0) 0) 0) CD O Co O CO 0) Q) O O O CD I- wV.-- t` !� M Q) o O CD O CD t` ti < 0 Z 2 L L C ID C _c:, Q C C C U C •-,- L >• t- sp ID ID C C C V ID C C C 0 O N CII Qs. N s. N N N N a, CO ru N , D C2 03 (6 a) N a) CII cv CU a) a) N ca ca co OLL -3 LL < -) W W .L U! -3 -3 -3 0 -) -, < w U_ w -) ) -) 0 w w U_ -) -) --) U) J CD CD O CD CD CD CD CD CD O O O CD CD CD CD CD CD CD O CD CD O CD CD CD O CD O O CD O CD 0 0 W < co OD CD COICOICIO COICOI (ID CID (ID (ID (ID (D CO N N N N N N N N N N N N CO 00 OD (X) CO M co --1 U) W F• N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N W W W W W Q F- F- F- F- F- F- F- W - F- - - L — LL- w OOOOOOO O O O O J J J CC > J J > > > > > U U U U U U U J D U U U U O W CD 0 0 0 0 0 W g 0 0 0 0 0 WW WW 0 0 0 0 O CO CD W W E CD M `,/- W 0 0 Z_ LU ^ o U) N Z ("Ni N N Q U) 0 0 Cr) W JW M .- CO -I QJ J CO W J Q~j (T W 0 cr > a F-' J cn w LU LU J > > > >_ Q F- F= F- W ) < < < w Ce < cr W z NM W i- — ct 0 <— 0 r- a 0 < 0 Y 0 J w F- - 0 U) U F- • Q -� cW OZ M CD U v (/) O Q O W r- U) W CO a w U) a Q• co CY co >� N Q (n N O (!) N J U > 0 CD W N CO N , '� N <0 (C) Q oo � o � � LO ‘- I--' > 0 o �- It J W N M ds O I 0 0 0 0 > rn Q a) C C c f- J a) t!) U) N (.D Co a) N- - co to co /` co W L.L ? 0 Op• O� Op OO N O. . N eui CV ms- CO to CO C OZ Z- R Q < W Z W Q 1-(,-1 O O O W 0 CC O co 1 M O N N M N O ti N 0) .- 0 0 0 O (D CO O co O O CD J V (� O O Oi CIDO) O O (D O r- N M N N N W J U O N M O V. N M O N M M O r Q 0 0O Z O ZtO 0 W - p CO CO O (D CD p N O CO O M ti N O O O • CD ti CD 0 D to • N o N ti N p Z Z Z Z O �t a? p p p N N (O � O ai t� 1 00 w 0 0 < D I- W D — 0 OO O CC cn Z J 0 1-- D 0a U) M CD (V N CO CD CD N N N- a) CD CO CO 0) CD CD CD CD v N- N 0 Z WCl) 1 j Q O 6 (O V O) .•- (D to to O (D N- Q) CD O O 4 to 4 Ma) '— (,) O cr N O 0) 00 ti CD to to ti CO a) u•) u•) u) v v v to v CO CO N O F- 0 Q J �t co M CO co v CO CO N N N N N CO CO co co CO co co CO d a' X W F N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N (V N N N N N N N w D W O w IX 0 Z — O J 2 ^ w _ ,- > QO' W N- O CO CO V' CD O Op a) V N O N- N 0) .- O O CD O co co CD M i Q J 1-1.-_ J O to M to O a) M M M O) N M O M O) O) (D to (D ti O op N- O) 11 w to N- CO 0) O O N- N N 0) ‘-- N- O CD CD CO co N co -4' V- ..0 co W a N F- Cn N N N N M CO N- A- A- N N CO co co co N N N N N N N N 0 = LL J 0 W Z CD 0) O ,- N M O) CD N CO O N CO a) a) a) a) O r- N co F-- LL D o 0 0 0 0 0 09999 O O O O ap a) O O O O < 0 Z C C C C C C (..- in JD C C V V fl A C C C O N CX L t -) ') N N COMM lL <L -3 -) m CU CX ( 1.L lL CX CX cu LL O O UUO Ci) J cn 0 CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD C. CD CD 0 CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD 0 CD CD 0Z a W Q o 0 0 0 0 o ai ai ai a) ai 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q D J co co M a) a) a) N- ti (D CO CO CO CD CO a) a) a) co co o ao (D co CO (D (D CO to to to tf) to to to to to to to to in to J Cn WF N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N LL 0 0 0 W < 0 0 > > > > > > >>> > > > o > > > > 0 0> > > >? > > Q Ct J 7 > > > > 7 > > J > > > > J J 0 J > > > > > > > > > > J > > > > J J 0 > > > > > Oix- 00000 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J1-- "- co o W la-W U N c,- a) W v `n 0 0 Z W N Z co N co O < CO 0 0 W -. W F- J J CO a) (D a) J < WW J_ O O a) a) W 0 > CC 0 W J D w w w> J— I- I" 17 W F- 0 0 17, 17 0 0 Z) I— u) < < < < C < Q C W N w , N Q ` 1-- < W ., W > M J W I— Z fn J Cn 0 N (n Q Q M M �1 ,f Z W M } d (n M < r- NJ -� M V- = %- J to a W , Z Q L. > a co 5 CO Z � N J M W (n (D < (n N '- ' (n Q to N N F-- N O N (9 ^O N A/ to N t[) (n to N > Li. Q Q to N 1- to 1- to F- to — 1•- O O J 1L W 'n CO t` CO 0 = 0 U 0 0 0 > 0) Q a) C C C I-- J V- V- a) f` 0) a) O CO a) O N 0) co M N N to to to tf) tf) a) to M ' N M M M 0 z Z RR Q (i) < W Z F. M co Nt J CL< r- CO co co CO co CO N CO O O O O O a) O O O W CC •O to N (0 N ao O O r- 6fl- C O CI) V f` V' O• co to co N to 1.--- CP `O O O -) O N N M M O N 6 r- r- p O 1, 4 N co `7 O �T �- N N co co co N N N CC W J U 4 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 F- Cr Q o 0 Z 0) Z W Nr CO ,L' p p V a) N -C «, O O M to M CO p O O Co O V- t-- O Z Z ZZ p f to CO O N ti to C O �, a) N L; p 4 ,- V f; N V N N w 0 0 < D U) W D — 0 w0 O w U) Z J U F' CC u) O a) tf) N OO v O O (0 t` to a) Nt O O ti N 0) M O O O O 0) O (0 0) N F- W U) D FW- i j < CO a) N (X0 N (O r- co 6 a) to V -0 M a) a) 00 (D OO M F- r- Moi r- a) 4 ' a) .crCO N N c- el O M CO N '- C V' CO V- N r- CD O CO (0 co CO N N N Q J CO co M M co CO co co M co 0 ":1- ,t- V V N N N N N N N N N CL Q X W I- N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N W D w 0 LL CC 0 Z J W I- V CO> C W CD CO Oo CO CO O O CO CO CO CO O O co a) r- t` Co 0 0 C. '- O V' w- a) I F- W W J W f`e- N 0) M a) to v N a) to a) -- �- N N- cd t� a) f- N Mai f- r- ao — to ao O F- Q J - co co C' CO V Q' CO N N e- CO v CO (D CO V' CO F- N. CO CO OD 0) w F N N N N N N N N (V N (V e- e- e- CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO a I LL J 0 Z 0) O e- (V CO (D 0) C) r- (V COCO ,- 0) O e- N CO O '- CO Co 0) O e- (V CO Oap CO CO a) a) O O O O F- LL 0 OO rn O O O O ONp a, c. O O O O a0 . 0 0 0 0 Q > 0 0 -0 0 C C < p Z '- fl C C C C f C C C > Q- fl fl C C fl- N a) cO CU (U NU a) a). D CD cocU a7 0 a) a) cU a3O < LL LL -) -3 -3 -� -1 LL LL -7 -3 ) Z U) LL- LL ) ) ) U) < Z ) LL LL LL CO J O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O CD O O O O O 0 W > < (V N N N (V (Ni u) U) U) U) CO to CO (0u6 co co (0 (D (0 06 0 0a 0 0 0 0 Q Z CL W Q (0 (D (0 (D (0 (D f` f` f` f- f- t- ti co (0 () (D CO cD CO CO CO CO CO CO CO to CO CO to to to to CO CO to to to to to CO (0 (D (0 (D (O (D CO (0 J co W 1- N N N N N• N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N LL C7 W W W W OW W W CL J > > > J J > > J J > > > > J J J J Q < J > > > > > J J > > > > > J J > > > > > J J J J > > > > > - 0 0 0 0 0 W w 0 0 0 0 0 W W 0 0 0 0 0 - w w w 0 0 0 0 0 0 D I J o W- W LL CO) co N a 0 z W ^a N N CO (0 (D < U) 0 0 V) W J W J J O N CO CO -J Q w J COCO CO CT) W 0 FL e- 0 H _j U) W > 0 W W J D > i= 1— > > Ce F- U z F- F- I— Ill U < 0 0 0 I- u) < O Z Q Q C/ Q CL 1.11 w cocc o ix (`) 0 0 U o W W a W Z 0‘- ‹ F- F- W U co W J cn Z U) Q Q' Q Ui Q W f— Q co to p (N U) ui .- J �-... W U) cED U co co ED z W U) CL w M z CL N z CL co Z cr CO - N JCC CV (D U) O O U) O U) — U) Q Uin O N to r- N ^O N LO CD to O CO r- < < ILO - F- to F- to F- to W- F- O 0 L Cs, CC u? O I 6 6Cael (9 > 0) • Q 0) C c c I- J N- U) 0) CC) 0) (D N- co 7 co V N. co co t~ M CB (l (II LL Q W p M M N V V (D N V (D Z ZZ O z - 4: f-- > > W Z W Q W CO CO V J CD O C3) O Ln CO t- CD o CD O O O d- CO N O O co O• O •O r- CO CO (D O co 0) CO u) O O 0 w 2' (• - M v v ti v O - CD (n O v N (3) (D to - O - r- ti 0) N- N ti CO O O O JM f� (N (N N CC 11111 II w J U O "7 N C? N N N M M O r r- N COM COC 7 COM V Ln O , N N COM , , N I 0 O O Z U (3) 0) i) co (31 (31 p O a (D• (3) (3) 00 p M O O `- Ln ti O co a0 v v 7 O co - O Z 0 Z Z- (n 1- w O o CC U) Z 0 F D 0 C O v O O N CO O O O O O (D ti CO O O CO O a O C3) ti O N- N- tL) CF-r Z O� D w > < (3i Q) V t` (D CO CD '- co O ti (D CV (Y) (D Qi CO (Ji co ,-- N- a 00 O a 4 a u) (D (D U) W ~ w Q CO N N (3) O 0 O (3) (3) Ln CO CO N N r O 0 0 O C3) O C3) CO 00 CO N- t v v CO N N- O eL 0 < J N N N 0) N N N N N N N N N N N N M CO N CO N N N N N v v- V V ,- 0_ d Cr X CY w N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N W D W O L_. CC U Z O J 1 Uw> O > O O O 03 O Ln CO , CO O O O O O v CO (NI O O t` O O O CD CO CD O CO Ln (3) V LC) I F-- w —'w V (D O Cb (D N. 00 M6 co (3) O 4 N (7) co 6 N6 N M (3 of ) N— (3) (3) ca a; V M M4 F— Q J LL to Lf) Lo (3) ti t` co co Q) Ln CD CD t� CO CO CO (3) O v- V to CD CO CD (3) 03 (3) O N •L I' p - CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO N N N N N N N N CO N N N N N N N N N N N N CO CO CO W (n N 1- Cr) 0 = LL --I Z - CO (3) O ,- N CO LL) CD ti CO O) O N co (3) O O N co .--- N O O O O O W 0 t` CO00 O O � N COM 40 (3) � (3) (3) O O O O Q) O (3) O O O O O O f` F_ Li- CO CO O, (3) O O O O I I I I I Ig L Q ` ID ID C C c .-, ID Q C C C Q O Z > U , >. , , , C C CII C C C (6 N N (U (� (D CJ (U (O (B 0 D O N C3 (a a) (L) a) m (II 7 Cll a) CL) C, (II (o G3 CD O Z 0 LL LL LL -, -, Q 0 LL LL LL -� -, -) Cn LL LL LL lL -, --3 -3 O LL LL -3 --3 (n J O O O O a O O O O O O a O O O O O O O a O O O O O O O O O O O O O c w 2 6 6 66 6 Ln 6 6 6 (D co (D (D CD (D CD (D CD O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O ZQ CO o J co M OO co M co co coO O O O O O O O O LC) LO Ln (f) (l) LO LO Ln V ',1- V ".,Tv Ln Ln L!) Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln In Ln Ln LC) Ln Ln Ln to Ln Ln Ln LO U) Ln U) t!) t"- t` t` V- 1.--- --. `-J Cn WF_ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N (N N N N N (N N (N (N N N N N (N N N N N N LL W W W W w w O W O wJ J J J D D D >D >D J J D� DDDDDD O J a 9 D D D J D O D D D D D Q J J J J > ? > > J J > > > > > > > J J > ? > > > > > J J J J J > > > > > J J 0 > > > > > J > > > > > D O w w w w 0 0 0 0 0 w w g 0 0 0 O 0 , W 2 2 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 U) 0 0 w- a F- 0) LO o CD CD w LL CO (D 0 O jW Z O N CO N N r-- 0 0 U) WJ w ti In rn 0) ( J F -—L J °° 0) a) 17 Q w J 0.) °) 1.1.1 0 0 • LLI w w F-- J U) W w > > — Ct Q F- 1- 1--- F W I- Q Q w Q Ce Q z 0 w J O J < 0 CC O W 0 O U Q 0 < w w w U) w J w F- < U) m � QU) U) w Z w w w }- 1_ w u) � U M rn Q co� °) cn `� cco D Z co W U) CL U) r--- co O v Z N ~ cr - J ti © u v © cn w cn J 0_ 0 N- U) N N �i N N N co to OM to O - .) t` Q ii Q Q Ln 1"' 11) c- F_ lL) r-- co V > 0 o/ CO LL V �W (0 t.-- 00 o I o 0 o w gar 0 > O Q CT)C C C F- J CO CO OO 0) (O O .-- to '',T CO CO C) CO (O CU LL Q W U') 4 cc) (O N N o N N tO -� �- D U 1 I i I I I 0 z - F- < < FW- Z W Q W M CO W Q O O to Q) O N O M to CO O a0 N O O ( O � N N cc) to CO O O O Q O t� V O M N CO • M N to O O O Cr J O 4 T- N t 7 r- O N N co co O tD p (fl VI I r- O O, (V ',-- N CO CO N N N W J U Q 0 Q Z 0 0 W Z 0 O O co 't tf) t` r` cO co N co CO O O co O N (O CO N O) O to r` CO O CO Z Z Z O 4 N 't 't N 1. aj ,— to 11 -- p (O ti (� r- M (� O 9 N - N w0 0 < D I- W D —- I Q Q CC Cn 1 J U I- D 0CL Cn O O to CO 0) N OO O t` tLOt- CO O N N O CO O CO a) CO M O CO Cr) M O 0 Z WZ U) D W > < tri O (O N N: 4 1` (i r- t.() '-- M M O N O M V �-- (o N O O (t) (: oO tt) M N N N N ,- O r- O a) a) O t` `�! `�t `tt V co M cocoup co coa) co co co co co r O a) a) dC4 x Q' > W COCO CO ~ ~ ~ ~ N N N N N N N N (N N 04 N N N N W D W Q > LL Cr 0 Z J F- UW> Q O O to a) v co N O co to co v O OO OO O -t O N N t- C) V' 1` t` C) I F- LU CL W •it-) �- M t: N to N M a) V' OO (O (O --N-- v r- O CO , a) a) F- N 4 F- Q J W t- I ti n oO CO a) OD a) O O ,- N t- CO ti CO 1` CO OO O .- .I- - M to to Cl- F- O - N N N N r 0 I LL J 0 Zti co a) O e- a) O N co , a) co a) O e- N co ,- N a) O .- N co W OO OO OO a) a) CDco a) °.' 0 O O O O O OO aO a) C 9 0 0 a) a) O O O O < 0 Z > C C C C C -DI) C C C C 0) L C C C C 1 C C IU o n . = D 0 0) tU CO co 7 O) CO (U t6 N m m al (O U O Z -7 -) a_ I_ -) < a_ l_ - -) U_ Is_ Is_ -7 Cn J U) O O O O O O O O O 0 0 O O O C) O O C) O O O O O O O C) O C) 0 LL > O O O Oa Oa Oa O O O O V d' 44 4 'fit 4 4 0 0a 0a 0 0 Z cc W Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N to LO to LO to to LO Q D '--) O O O O C) O O O O O O O O CO CO CO CO OO OO CO CO CO CO (O CO CO CO CO J W - N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N tL W W W W W W W W W W W W W W J J J J J J J _J J J J _J J DDDDD — — — D D D D D — — D D D D D LL W LL W LL lL LL LL lL LL W LL LL Q J J J J J J J J J J J J -t J Q J J J J J J J J > > > > > J J J > > > > > J J > > > > > Q W WW W WW W WW Q Q Q Q Q W W W Q Q Q Q Q W W Q Q Q Q Q CO J a F- OO OO N W O to W V a 0 Z N Z O co N Cn r- Q u) U a (/) W J W t` F- CO F--- J J o0 OO .J Q W _J a) rn rn W a a >' > 011.1 LU I— J co w w > _ JD H—' L H I-- 0 CO W I— u) Q Q w Ct < W w '- O In Z (") CO i Q V U 0 w J U t- w w --1 Cn Q u)Q >- H Cr v Q v M > No Q W W U a W OD Cr f- O CO z J cr ct , w w cn o QN to F- tO to N F - > 0 w N c? O i w w w 0 > O C C C I-- -I - OD O 7 ••,--- : 2 2 1` 1` co to U U co W < W OO (D O 1 N Q O- N (7 ` Z Z Z_ 0 Z F- Q > W Z W ~Q W -D O Nt 0 CT) M co W 0 CC O CO 7 O ' p (D O (D O O (D p N N OD C O O to O CO r-- O O O Q' r- O �- M '_T co O O r• LO r-• N M O O O Cr J D p 00 N CD O O O . CO r O t i N N N W J O U U N F- Q Q 0 0 W z a p CO N p 7 O (D OD v O v (D v 7 w O - h ti to O r r r Z z 0 O O O r CO CO 0 _ t)O M p O O 7 6 7 r 7 M N O O C ( p •- W 0 O < D F-- Z Z = 0 0 W O 0- 0 u) F- (C to Z U F- 0w w N Nr N O O O O (D O '• 'CT O O O E E N 0 0 (M (D w Z W U) D W >W << (D N �. M N co ti ti (D (D CO �' N O) 4 O O p (MO e-- N- to v- 1- O) F- (V M N r-LO ID tf) CO to CO CO to to to -4- N " LO CO CO CO CO N *-- Ci_ (C X C W N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N n n N CD O O (N O CO N (N N N N N W D W tL (C O Z W ~ U > (C I j O O O ,-- O O CD CO O CO O CO O O 1` V• CO O I < W • O ('- ('" ('" to O O V oO 1: F- Q J Li -1 co O COM O i` Q) co O r N CO (V N to () 1` 1` 1` O CL_ F- O - W co co O CO OO aO OO OO OO () O) CD N N N N N N N W Cl) (y F- (i) 0 = W J C) _ CD r N CO Zo (D CO (D a) CD .- N CO COM W 0 o 0 o O o CO0 0) rn rn rn rn rn 0 0 0 0 O rn CO O O O O U n -6 C C C < O Z C C n C co U C U Q U D ani an) U U co l� 0 tt_" , Q --) lL U_ --' -•) --) a, CI ti i) -�7 0 U) N N N CD CD O CD CD CD CD CD O CD O CD O O O O O CD O CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD W Q O O CD CO CD CO (D V `� a) a) a) Cr) O O J (U) J ti (D CD CO(D (D (D CO(D CO CO CO CO CD CO CO CO t` W F- N N N N N N N N (N N N N N N N N N N (N N N N N N N lL W W W W W W W W W J J J J J J J DDDDD D - DDDDD I-w w w w U. ll_ ft J J J J J J J > > > > > > J J J J J J J > > > > > > J > > > > > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W W WW WW W WW WW 0 0 0 0 0 0 w 0 0 0 0 0 U > > 7 > W a O O (D � W 0 a 0 Z W• N Z CO CO O (D CO Q U) 0 0 W J W CO Q W J p CD a) ON a) W 0 ( N N > 0 WIli w J J D > > > W z > Ce 1--- R•- o 0O 0 I— W 0 0U Q I- U3 < < Z 0 U N aco 05 Y (D W N CL to CC (�) co M Q D U < 0 w w w w 1.11 0 J W °- J U U Q 0 m W (C CC W (C W (C W 0 ] M W cn '- 0 - O O ao O v Z O W CL W rt co z v z z rn w in co N J V 0 co t`Do U) co v7 v () cn O O v N U) r t1') �_ r- to N N ,i M . ln t4) N CO �- t() O to N Q <0 0 < LO N F- to - F- to F- to F- > 0 O H CO CO Ce (n J to (Oti °O 0 = W W W W (9 > CA Q rn c c c 1-- J O C. (Y) CO CO CO 11._ Q w - -) -) -, D U 00 Z Z 1 Q CA `. > W-- Z F W Q W J T O ' O O O W 0Et O Q O O N N N J U O T O T �- M• Q o O O s I- N Z 0 cy) 4- W Z 0 o ) D ] o }CA co O oT O L Z ccT c o v- q cp ZZ w U (j < : U L ..C1 W o z o o 0 w + fr Cn Z J U D �- o a) o 0 o r� O O Z CC W Cn D Fw- W < -2 M 1` t0 13 Z Q 0 CC I- o Q JN e °) o N rn CD ,j5 d Ct x w N N N N N •_ W J w 0 LL Q 0 Z - 0 J g ^ C w i- U 0 CD > W O T O O 1` CO ti N- N CO L C7 O CO O CO = f-- W W J N �. O C..• N ca t0 �- (C) ti OO V CO .n 4 tf) O (o COE Q J LI- Li N t7 N CO M CO M CD M CO CO COCOCO O O O W (n c) I- Cl) co CO CO CO CO V' V V' V' T T T T T T T T / N L. C = W J .= Cir 0 to ti CO t.0 (O r� co to (0 r� co ZT N co T N () Q) Q) a) Q) O O O O O O O O L W O O O O o O O O O O O O O O O O O O ti_ (�- C`' 1 1 1 T T T T T T T T T T T T Q o Z C� ai . (13C` CO cu (v 0 0 0 >- a 0 U co Z Z Z } LL -, --, -3 D D D < CL W W w j D : < W 0 < < < 2 Q o o LL -, --, -, o J Q CC I: a Z O O O O o O a O L LL Z CC J Q CO CO CO CO co co CO CO Q. J w W • 1-- N N N N N N N N W CD Q Wa Q v 00) D > > ii D > > (O 1- CC J cc 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 = as w- a r- co o = 0 Z N• ^ 0 c/) - Z o °° Qcr, V R3 U C (i) w -. wL co J co W V W CD W o '- 0 C- 0 CD r T 0 W Z QCCal J U) D W m W m Y Y o .c J D W > < > < 0 0 H ccQ a F- w 1= w 0 0 Z Q E-- Ili F- Q 0 Cn 0 Co 1- F- t0 0 u, 0 Z oZ o u) u) Et < _ � _ � W N vi W Q C I— (i) c ca < 0 Y 0 CO 0 o D co Q N [n N ~ a) w m 0 0 Q tu v) r` w rn w-co ti W m 0 0 W W Cl) a w v 0CD T VI CD U M vo to J cC 0 (h o LU Z w to Z w r) CO _ - 0 O 03 O to C 0 co 0 M T �� T T Q Q to cfl to CA H- to 0) F- �- T T 0 u Q •w o J CO Ln COw J T •••••• W0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 CLw w Z APPENDIX D • • WATER SUPPLY • • • 1 • • • • •• • t • • • • •• • •r 1 • • • • • 1 • • • 0 • 0 • • • • co • -0 e--- Cc N • E0 0 CD a3 o 15 F- O- • ® D • F • • f. * Z i • < .,, t, ., _. . . • ,. • e -• . - __ • .,.._ i.e uj s1i '- 0 0 ...I Q 4. . _►. soM i •,,..,,.,:.-.....:. - co_ • l— W c. .,....,-Ls..,. . - ' ; .- N z • M W :•;...,,,,;41, hlJ: • rX Emil ', , •Ul a •0 w I< Le W l I- S =4 Ce • (9 >mu . O LL IW 11— .• O —J M .. '. . ,... : .i —1 U ,..' , 'd 045 , o N , o , 0 4- > , . 0 CEm" , ? 0 iff ® Z . ��. -.F' Ce W 0 CO : • w • OC , al. . MN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o op 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' F F F F F F F F F iii 00 CO '1- c\I 0 00 CO V' N imp ( eaj a.J3v puewea • • • • • • • • • • • i • • • __, • cz a) u_ • u L cy) Q • Q co o 0 in..I. L z --c c.c) 0 w — w 0 .. N' (Z a) fl N Z • • LU M i:'47,47/ , • 0 6 ,.., i 40 31, „, o 0 — _....__I (j) a F-7.-. Lu = ce 0 ....... c < ,.., III a) . CNI ct ce u_ = co ,t, Lu w ict co LIU i— I— Ill .1,5,.•/,,,, W < 4o * = >e LU oci --Anc i.' \ au (.9 lli —I 0 LI— Q col • Q > w a • 0 z a • Ce W a • w _ CO• _I coc • < 0 LL N .1-, < , • _ • o < a) co _ •(7 NII” • N CQ L N- o 4 CL • f:4" C • a� • 0 • • • • • •• lb • I • • LL i 4) u... Q � Q � Z Co 2 (0 Z� v ce c Cf) W U.Q >' 10 l0 0 p J Cr) .. •. W 1 TI' n W (i) \\\,,4 M W W to W Q Q 0 ,F, . N rX E I 0 >- W a e �. W Na m..., a 13 L. .. SI 4., ma Q .L}: I L. „,Y 1111, s < as — cy) E U 1 a j I ,i •_ > W ._ >1 . Q N u_ O z 0 ..,; i N .- ...e.L Ce Ill La �: I c0 C� oC 0 N� 1 —• ' iitt 0 M � j:' 47 .. W :.; CD rte, CD wC .G4 L Q 4a. 2 . LL CQ (/) = 0 W o 0 W M 0 CV APPENDIX E 5-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN . sr O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O CD O O O O 0 O O CD O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O 0 O ' O O O O O_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O ti O O O O O To O O c1') to O O Co U) O O O O CO O CO CO 10 o CO U) Tt N f` to u-) N N ti to to co N O it, CO N ti I- r- 1- M r (a to ER H? EA EA EA. EA EA EH EA- H? EA Ea E!? EA ER Es EA ER ER O O OO O O p . 11111111 ' O O_ a O O N O O ti O O O e- r O N EA H9 EA,.4/7, EA - OO O O I,- O O O O O . . O p O O O O d Id O N O p O O CDC70 CO 10 O O O N Ei) U, III'! Ef3 EA EH EF). EA U O 0 0 0 o O O o O a CD O O o O O O o O O O 0 1 o 0 0 0 O o o O o a ' O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O p to to O N O N { CO CO I;) CO t[) N N I.-- C) N N O r r r O N 1/3. ER ESD Ell ER U, U) U) EA ER EA EA .- C U U 0 G1 1 E :Cpl.° 0 0000 0 0 0 o O ' p ' • O O O O o O ' O N 0o0 � :Sin O O CO N NE OO N tf) to Ef3 ER III Ei) Ef3 EA Ef3 E a) a•+ U) - O a 00 O O O •IC)IC)IIa O O O O O O O OO O O OG O O O O O O OO O ' O O 0) OO O • O O O Or- i� O O 0 N O O to O O OCO CO L U) N pWEA ER U, to EF3 ER ER t!) Eft U, a 0 0 CI) CD a) o o a o ami o -o -o -oo -o -o -o0 Rs -o Fi -0 0 Q Q 0) 0 0 z z a) 0 0 CO0 ▪ Q a Q a� a� a a� Q Q U D D D D D D Et CC J tY D = w W LL U 1ui:n > ' IN7 •o [L ta) ^ C •J E c a2 -- 03 rn c U o o -- 8 u a. 0 _ a) . o In ^ U C C ca - co CU -E a N 4-+ a) , N c O .O co U N ' E o _ 0 ET t!) ca O LO (U L 0 a) o M — 0 a) D ', - -� (0 0 0 0) t a) a) •� g CK • N O o •ca o o U o Z Q. u) ..N r` L cn .-. o > > r_ • O o _ o o 1!! L 1` C) W C) > oO CO `� (� > W �. �' cEa o _`� ca o U CO CO J m CO c�a Ei _E "DE = ? o5 0 o c��a a c° o C r a- a) c - ER _ c C L N ca N o E CD ca _0 Q > ca „.9 =1 C3 o •Q o a �0 a, aCl) y U 0 U C a) •� U E o U as o) T, as � aa)) CU CU RL Z U- d 3 w ac _J W U v) 2 __I 0 _1 2 12 2 0 U) A U (1) • 'c _ N Z iii Tii O N :° CO o >• }, C� U r C N co LO 0 CO 1` CO O 0 r 0 V H I--' IT I- I- I- L O i� o_ Ce n`. cin co u) U) _ Cl) o O o 0 0 0 0 0 CD 0 0 CD 0 0 o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 o ai o C) ori 6' u-i cri o 0 o C» Ca co -4' d' U) C)) .-- Cr) CO) N N CV CV C') CO M CD ....• r r N N H CA EA iA EA CA EA EA ER EA EA EA EA EA EA ER EA fA CD CD CD 0 0 00 p O O O O O 00 ' ' p O O O O O `'.1 CD C) O O r r N co co 0 C O O r N to (A EA EA EA EA iA EA O O O O O 1` O O O O O 0 ' ' O CD O O O 0 (U C) O r r NN M CD CD O M Or O N EA EA EA EA EA EA <A O O O O CD O O O O 0 ' O O O O O CV Lf) 1` 1' N N N CVO O O ej O N N EA to EA EA 4 �� U) C a) , E OO O O a a w CO O O O O a a a O O O O a_ a o a O O O O a a 1... , co co N CD CD CL M E a r O - N EA EA EA Ea EA EA EA EA E a +-• U) >+ O a . O a a N (n O O O O 0 O O co Oa a 4-- C) a O O O O ti 0 C c11 .4- ..1 , O O .= N M r r M U) a O N GU 0) Nco W EA iA EA EA ($ EA a a) a) o Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q co ZZZZZZZZZZ v) rn Ca a a U D D a) a Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q = ZZZZZZZZZZ 0 N C , �_ RS j O CL. i a) U , a) o C +.• iX cN I � � � 75 U N- d' ` d" va E5 2 0 0 ! Cr > V' ,r Vim' N Co L- > 00 O O .t O (0 �- N M -�N N > � p p N N N r a) ., O 0 a) c- r . . . . . r r 473 E -c2 cn M E = - TO 31 , � 6 as a) a) a) U) a) a) a) a) a) CU > =i 0 5 -(3- 0 m CO CO CU m CD CO CO CO al ,�.,CI) = i c .0 -C a a Cl a Q. a a a a �`+ 0 4) a 0) U) U) U) U) 0) U) U) U) U) t�Z LL CL to CO CO C!) >, J CC CC CC CL CL Cr Cr Cr CL U • L • Q) Z CI) fes.. CD 0 ..+ • >. co co t� N �-+ 0 ,-- O 0 v IT F. i- O -- O •- tv O = m t` co a) O N M �t (C) CO i-- M 0 O U. a. a! CL CO U) N N N co co co co co co co U) I- O O O O O O O O OO O O O a ' ' O ' a ' ' ' O O O ' a a O a N O O N N 15 I- N- d' O N CO r, H r- r N Eft foG Eft Eft 40 Eft Eft fA Eft Eft Eft Eft lee fA CO O e e e e e O N O O N fA fA to fA EA- , 0 e e e e e O N CO O O N O O O O O CO O O O O O O ' O O ' O O O O a p O O O CV O a O a a CO ti ti N N Co O CO O }+ N = to Eft fA EA. Eft to U, a) E Q1 _ > O aO a O a a L a ' ' ' a a a a. a N O O O E 4 a a a _. O O a O - e- r- 'a O CD N — f,H U, (0} Eft 4e) U, Cra CD 1i = O O O O O O O O ' ' ' O O O 4- 'W a O O O 0 C CV (NI c4 .1 cr CO O Q) Q- O N W 4 to. U, Eft fA fA a C C C C 0 0 0 0 O co �cn "cn cn cm 0 co0 0 0CO CU Q Q Cl CL U W W W W °) Z U U _ C 0 N e_ N > O O C e_ (U 0 a. 0 00 C O i — C O C C 1 o a`) • CO ih- N o - 0 N O Cr N O N 0 O CC *k •� L L I` a) .c .2 a- Q. W E O 5iA O co co z •o cn > c V, • a� a = ca C-Z li a m 2 As 0 cti } Z r-0 o N Tu co 0 L0 CD ia. a aI- ` )c 17 .0 i c)n n 1- O O CD O TO o 0 O o 0 CD O o O o 0 o O CD CD CD O CD CD o O CD O O CD CD O O CD CD O CD CD CD O CD O O LC) O O O O O O O O 00 CO O O CO CO CO LU CO LU LU CO CO CD CD 0) 0) N N CO �" VI,- - e t� ti I"- N 1.- Cr) CO N 1` O - I-- e-- N T N N M CO 1` Co r N EA EA EA EA EA EA *A 636363 E0 EA EA EA , O O CD O CD O O CO CD O CD O O O O O O O LO O N N • 1...- 0 CV LC �OLC O i I` 1` M Co O N N- 1` CO CO CD O CO CO CO ct' 'r I,- 1` O_ O CV 1 EA E/3 EA ER EA 60, EA E3 0 0 0 CD O o O CD O CD O o N- CD O CD O Ln O CD O O O O O LO LA_ I,- 1- CD O N O L17 O N N 1` 1` O O O NCV N I CO CO CO CO CO CD CO CD r r- r- O O Co_ O s r- T- N O N EA EA EA EA EA E!3 63 EA EA U 0 0 O O CD O CD O O CD CD O O O CD O O O O O CD O O O • O O O O ( O O ti 1` 1 N O O M Co N N O LA N N r- ,- CC) CD O O T.: N EA EA (/3 iH Ef?; iR fR to , 0 0 0 i O co O O O O O I co O O O OO O O O O O O , O O O O O O O O O O O O I O O O O CD Co O O O O O O O I O O O O O O O O O O O I O N N N V) O O O O O M t .cf ..t >► O r- r L1') N i ti O'i (n O N L EA EA . EA EA E13 03 EA I E!3 EA EA 60. CD ca 0 0 U 0 0 VO O O O O CD O O O Q) C CD O CD CD O CD CD O O L- E a O O O O O O O ' O O 0 N , co Co O LO O CD CD O Co •� d d N N O O O O O -� ON Co co."; a.) a) V N 0) ce EA ESD EA. EA EA EA 63 EA EA ^^� 0 0 0 0 0 1 • ' -O -a '0 -0 T3 -0 -O -0 "a ai a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) o E E E E E E E E E a) a) a) aa) i aa)i a) aai a)a0 cv ) CD U [Y Cr Cr CC CC CC Cr Cr, co , ,- N r- c- N T- 4-- CV, CO a. 1 4 I t i N 0S = Cfl 03 0,6 �1 _i a - (V CV_ ▪ N � ca cn 2 _- __I t w O M I a) a0 Eo` E - , • E N Co i ai 0 .� .r O N c in in , Z U 0 c CD: W a) E ..••, L L O O C c c _cn J J 05 _Q E ? O O O _.-+ Q..0 L C i 0) a) 01 (v CO (a E O O (6 D D t AU LLI L CD L V i r 1 Q Q Q bf i _0 (TS Z LL a OC N to CL CL Q_ 2 N 0 0, 0) U CO } • N Cr)CU t7 OCXI CC) N- M O) WI 11 Q U Q til-) 1 a. ; cin cooU) I- APPENDIX F PROPOSED RATE SCHEDULES RS-1 w• l"" a, . 3010 Q QOCo '� to � � tOLOLO oIO N N N N N N N N N D 2 H 0r M M M M cv)• M M •cM •m W O w EL U a F-F- � w o o o o o o o o o Z0 M o ooo00Uoo0 W 000000000 O � wo000000000p ci c NI en r Mtii W a N N N co to M r oo 0 0 r M N 0 0 M M M M M M M M M = O ri M 00 Lef, __I ix ._ . ,_ ,.. ... L.. ,.. ,_ ... U ._ Z M 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ce 0 uu Z o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 Z 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 U) 13N 0 J W u r` , M ca (1 CA 00W0WWWWWWWWW W a C W O Ld7 1q1qLn LA Ln a W/ N N N CO CO CO N O O CO Q 2 p N N N N N N N N N 0c''� co L L L L L L L L L Ce a Q W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' U a ._ U) p W o 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 E Q }- Uj 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E Ce F- f_- J W m t r, ,t 4t M co co O Q Z - N N N N to C/) r M N O O U/) 0 = W Q o �n �n �n u� �n �n �n �n 0 ai M CeW a U 2 W 0o M M M M M M M M M a L L H J '- N N N N N N N N N U) CI p o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Z t� _ o O F- rY o 0 o 0 0 0 o 0 0 ,� U 0 W W W a_ 0 0 co ao o m o) 0 0 V 0 0 ( - CI n- r r M 00 0o co ao co W = Q' 0 � � r r r t-- WOO W D U = 0 E Z ON 1- W - o 0 D Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q ~ W �t 0 �- Cl) 0 U) W F- ui ori ti , , M cfl CO ii �� Q ) Z F- Z N N N CO C7 c— Oo O O >.. C CO M Cl) Q Q 0e 0 N N N N N N N N N ...1 0 1.11 M N eicii 0 'Mina � � a w o � -IOW F- Q r r �- r �- r r r r Z 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 Q Z g ce Q W W 0 U o o csa ao o co ai o 0 • W Q 0- U o. C7 CO CO ao Co O O a _ W Q o co CZ � Q W Q CO Q Q O. a) m >- ui m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W COF- F- Q W Ca J Z w o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 = W O w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p O O CD co 800 008 0) 0 0 �_ F D2W 0rnrna� a� a) a) rnrna) 0 d r- r 00 00 • 0 0 r r Cl) 2 F- 0 . , co 2 U 0 J a 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 o 0 6. 0 , U r o `� O 0 O N 0 0 0 0 0 Ze � D N U) W 000000000 N W H N W 0 r CO t0 t0 N 4Z H Z o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r r M t0 O 0) O r- N 0 rn 0 W oo (0056 coai o 0 Q 0 rM0N flC - cy, co co a) O Or J co 0o NQ U) a m (2 0 o o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 , ; 00 ,- 000000 W c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z Q - N W O O CO N 0 0 0 �- m r- M Cfl 0 0 OT- M (D N W W M M Q 0 0 F- N X X r N M ef' CO Oo DU) -0 2 Loco U m c c c4 W W mm I-- NW XX r N M et t0 W W W WV' O M TABLE FOR MONTHLY CHARGES & PERCENT INCREASE COMPARISON CUSTOMERS WITH A 5/8 X 3/4" METER PROPOSED BASE RATE 2.1% INCREASE IN BASE RATE FROM $12.00 TO $12.25 (INCLUDES 0 GALS) PROPOSED COMMODITY 1.0% INCREASE IN TIER 1 FROM $1.90 TO $1.92 ( 0- 10,000 GALS) 8.5% INCREASE IN TIER 2 FROM $2.35 TO $2.55 (10,001 -25,000 GALS) RS-1 8.3% INCREASE IN TIER 3 FROM $3.00 TO $3.25 (OVER 25,000 GALS) CUSTOMERS PERCENT OF GALLONS CURRENT PROPOSED AMOUNT PERCENT IN USAGE CUSTOMER USED RATE RATE INCREASED INCREASED CATEGORY BASE 0 12.00 12.25 0.25 2.1 1,000 13.90 14.17 0.27 1.9 2,000 15.80 16.09 0.29 1.8 3,000 17.70 18.01 0.31 1.8 4,000 19.60 19.93 0.33 1.7 5,000 21.50 21.85 0.35 1.6 6,000 23.40 23.77 0.37 1.6 7,000 25.30 25.69 0.39 1.5 8,000 27.20 27.61 0.41 1.5 9,000 29.10 29.53 0.43 1.5 10,000 31.00 31.45 0.45 1.5 F-- Average Residential Usage 11,000 33.35 34.00 0.65 1.9 12,000 35.70 36.55 0.85 2.4 13,000 38.05 39.10 1.05 2.8 As of 12/31/02 there were 14,000 40.40 41.65 1.25 3.1 14,646 residential customers whose 15,000 42.75 44.20 1.45 3.4 water use averaged 10,000 16,000 45.10 46.75 1.65 3.7 gallons of water per month. 17,000 47.45 49.30 1.85 3.9 _ 18,000 49.80 51.85 2.05 4.1 These customers represent 19,000 52.15 54.40 2.25 4.3 93.6%of the total customer base. 20,000 54.50 56.95 2.45 4.5 21,000 56.85 59.50 2.65 4.7 22,000 59.20 62.05 2.85 4.8 23,000 61.55 64.60 3.05 5.0 24,000 63.90 67.15 3.25 5.1 25,000 66.25 69.70 3.45 5.2 26,000 69.25 72.95 3.70 5.3 27,000 72.25 76.20 3.95 5.5 28,000 75.25 79.45 4.20 5.6 29,000 78.25 82.70 4.45 5.7 30,000 81.25 85.95 4.70 5.8 31,000 84.25 89.20 4.95 5.9 32,000 87.25 92.45 5.20 6.0 33,000 90.25 95.70 5.45 6.0 34,000 93.25 98.95 5.70 6.1 35,000 96.25 102.20 5.95 6.2 36,000 99.25 105.45 6.20 6.2 P 37,000 102.25 108.70 6.45 6.3 38,000 105.25 111.95 6.70 6.4 39,000 108.25 115.20 6.95 6.4 40,000 111.25 118.45 7.20 6.5 RS-1 TABLE FOR MONTHLY CHARGES AND PERCENT INCREASE COMPARISON FOR CUSTOMERS WITH A 3/4"x 3/4" METER BASE RATE = $18.50 COMMODITY RATE: TIER 1 =$1.92 FOR 0- 10,000 GALLONS TIER 2 =$2.55 FOR 10,001 -25,000 GALLONS TIER 3 = $3.25 FOR USAGE OVER 25,000 GALLONS GALLONS BILL AT THE BILL AT THE AMOUNT OF PERCENT OF USED IN CURRENT PROPOSED INCREASE INCREASE 1 MONTH RATE RATE PER MONTH 0 18.00 18.50 0.50 2.8% 10,000 37.00 37.70 0.70 1.9% 25,000 72.25 75.95 3.70 5.1% 40,000 117.25 124.70 7.45 6.4% 50,000 147.25 157.20 _ 9.95 6.8% TABLE FOR MONTHLY CHARGES AND PERCENT INCREASE COMPARISON FOR CUSTOMERS WITH A 1" METER BASE RATE = $30.75 COMMODITY RATE: TIER 1 =$1.92 FOR 0- 16,000 GALLONS TIER 2=$2.55 FOR 16,001 -27,000 GALLONS TIER 3 = $3.25 FOR USAGE OVER 27,000 GALLONS GALLONS BILL AT THE BILL AT THE AMOUNT OF PERCENT OF USED IN CURRENT PROPOSED INCREASE INCREASE 1 MONTH RATE RATE PER MONTH 0 30.01 30.75 0.74 2.5% 16,000 60.41 61.47 1.06 1.8% 27,000 86.26 89.52 3.26 3.8% 38,000 119.26 125.27 6.01 5.0% 50,000 153.36 164.27 _ 10.91_ 7.1% TABLE FOR MONTHLY CHARGES AND PERCENT INCREASE COMPARISON FOR CUSTOMERS WITH A 1 1/2" METER BASE RATE = $61.25 COMMODITY RATE: TIER 1 = $1.92 FOR 0- 38,000 GALLONS TIER 2 = $2.55 FOR 38,001 -64,000 GALLONS TIER 3 =$3.25 FOR USAGE OVER 64,000 GALLONS GALLONS BILL AT THE BILL AT THE AMOUNT OF PERCENT OF USED IN CURRENT PROPOSED INCREASE INCREASE 1 MONTH RATE RATE PER MONTH 0 60.00 61.25 1.25 2.1% 38,000 132.20 134.21 2.01 1.5% 64,000 193.30 200.51 7.21 3.7% 90,000 271.30 285.01 13.71 5.1% 125,000 376.30 398.76 _ 22.46 6.0% RS-1 TABLE FOR MONTHLY CHARGES AND PERCENT INCREASE COMPARISON FOR CUSTOMERS WITH A 2" METER BASE RATE = $98.00 COMMODITY RATE: TIER 1 =$1.92 FOR 0-80,000 GALLONS TIER 2 =$2.55 FOR 80,001 - 134,000 GALLONS TIER 3 = $3.25 FOR USAGE OVER 134,000 GALLONS GALLONS BILL AT THE BILL AT THE AMOUNT OF PERCENT OF: USED IN CURRENT PROPOSED INCREASE INCREASE 1 MONTH RATE RATE PER MONTH 0 96.00 98.00 2.00 2.1%1 80,000 248.00 251.60 3.60 1.5% 134,000 374.90 389.30 14.40 3.8%1 275,000 797.90 847.55 49.65 6.2% 325,000 947.90 1,010.05 62.15 6.6%1 TABLE FOR MONTHLY CHARGES AND PERCENT INCREASE COMPARISON FOR CUSTOMERS WITH A 3" METER BASE RATE =$196.00 COMMODITY RATE: TIER 1 = $1.92 FOR 0- 186,000 GALLONS TIER 2 = $2.55 FOR 186,001 - 311,000 GALLONS TIER 3 = $3.25 FOR USAGE OVER 311,000 GALLONS GALLONS BILL AT THE BILL AT THE AMOUNT OF PERCENT OF USED IN CURRENT PROPOSED INCREASE INCREASE 1 MONTH RATE RATE PER MONTH 0 192.00 196.00 4.00 2.1%; 100,000 382.00 388.00 6.00 1.6% 186,000 545.40 553.12 7.72 1.4% 311,000 839.15 871.87 32.72 3.9%' 450,000 1,256.15 1,323.62 67.47 5.4%1 TABLE FOR MONTHLY CHARGES AND PERCENT INCREASE COMPARISON FOR CUSTOMERS WITH A 4"METER BASE RATE = $306.00 COMMODITY RATE: TIER 1 = $1.92 FOR 0- 169,000 GALLONS TIER 2 =$2.55 FOR 169,001 -283,000 GALLONS TIER 3 = $3.25 FOR USAGE OVER 283,000 GALLONS GALLONS BILL AT THE BILL AT THE AMOUNT OF PERCENT OF USED IN CURRENT PROPOSED INCREASE INCREASE 1 MONTH RATE RATE PER MONTH 0 300.00 306.00 6.00 2.0%1 100,000 490.00 498.00 8.00 1.6% 169,000 621.10 630.48 9.38 1.5% 283,000 889.00 921.18 32.18 3.6% 350,000 1,090.00 1,138.93 48.93 4.5%' TABLE FOR MONTHLY CHARGES AND PERCENT INCREASE COMPARISON FOR CUSTOMERS WITH A 6" METER BASE RATE = $612.00 COMMODITY RATE: TIER 1 = $1.92 FOR 0- 1,800,000 GALLONS TIER 2 = $2.55 FOR 1,800,001 -3,006,000 GALLONS TIER 3 =$3.25 FOR USAGE OVER 3,006,000 GALLONS GALLONS BILL AT THE BILL AT THE AMOUNT OF PERCENT OF USED IN CURRENT PROPOSED INCREASE INCREASE 1 MONTH RATE RATE PER MONTH 0 600.00 612.00 12.00 2.0% 1,000,000 2,500.00 2,532.00 32.00 1.3% 1,800,000 4,020.00 4,068.00 48.00 1.2% 3,000,000 6,840.00 7,128.00 288.00 4.2% 5,000,000 12,836.10 13,623.80 787.70 6.1% TABLE FOR MONTHLY CHARGES AND PERCENT INCREASE COMPARISON FOR CUSTOMERS WITH A 8"METER BASE RATE = $1,224.00 COMMODITY RATE: TIER 1 = $1.92 FOR 0- 1,800,000 GALLONS TIER 2 = $2.55 FOR 1,800,001 -3,006,000 GALLONS TIER 3= $3.25 FOR USAGE OVER 3,006,000 GALLONS GALLONS BILL AT THE BILL AT THE AMOUNT OF PERCENT OF USED IN CURRENT PROPOSED INCREASE INCREASE 1 MONTH RATE RATE PER MONTH 0 1,200.00 1,224.00 24.00 2.0% 1,000,000 3,100.00 3,144.00 44.00 1.4% 1,800,000 4,620.00 4,680.00 60.00 1.3%� 3,000,000 7,440.00 4 7,740.00 300.00 4.0% 5,000,000 13,436.10 14,235.80 799.70 6.0% GOLF COURSE CONSERVATION RATES TO BECOME EFFECTIVE WHEN USAGE EXCEEDS THE ARIZONA DEPT. OF WATER RESOURCES ANNUAL ALLOTMENT. APPENDIX G ALTERNATIVE RATE SCHEDULES RS-2 & RS-3 J Q a0 M co to to to to to to to to 2 W o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 2 H o M M M M M M M M M rX O ce w U a I- >- Cl) W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (� (/) o 0 0 0 0 o o 0 o W M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O gri iii 4 4M to u0 W 0 0 0 0 M M M M M M M M M 0 0 0 0 0 0 W a N N N co ch e- 00 0 0 � � � � ca 1— M N 0 0 E � M MU O J 61- > > > > > > > > > U a- Z ch 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o (2, Z j F- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WI < 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 co 0 N 0 J i„!.! �n 'c i N NI' r (. c6 co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r S N 0 0 a 2 W 0 d' d` d' it tt d' Q FY N N N co CO co 0 0 O 2p. N N N N N N N N N O M M DL L L. L L L. L.. L L. W O Ce U > >) > > > > >) >) > CL U a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 v) 0 W 000000 ° o ° — }- Uj 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 Co < F-Z F= JQ W N N N 4. M ccoo O O WQ N 0 (n e- M N 0 0 0 it O cc O L1� L In L[) Lc.f)) Ln Ln In O M M (V W ._ W 00 M M M M M M M M 0. - - - . . . � J 0 N N N N N N N N N (/)frz, 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 J _ 0 0 0 Cr W W o o a0o� o c0o� 0 0 0 O e- M 00 00 to Cp 00 • Z W E 0 0 a. P M _ ♦' z J e- ,- Ce IL 0 0 - V W W F 06 o 0 0 Z N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ot Ciiw 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 Lii m 0 0 H (n W F--- Lri Ln N v' d= cfi ( co In CC og U) 0 r Q = Z H Z N N N CO (� ) CO 0 0 M N O O I co- co O O cc 0 'a"�' d. d. d. T. d. T. '. -I 0 W crcf W a 0 a) cfl W a 2 W o al as 0 aI al al al al 01 0 J fY , , , , , , , , , J W r- I- 0 F= r- e- e- e- �- �- Z Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 O O Q Q m g ce O W W 0 U o o c6 ao o co of o 0 A Z O W a. U a C7 r r r CO CO co 0 0 O O a .- co QA r r CO 00 ILrel m O O a. F- >- J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L. >- Q W o 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O U .1 Z 0 r 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q o 0 0 co ci co co ca o 0 0 W 0a) rna) a) 0) 0) 0) rna) 0 d. CD CO 0� N O c r r r r r r r- r r 0 0 e- U 0 W J 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U LI U , -100Lnun00000 zpW 0 W c N 10 1` N 0 0 0 0 0 CO W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W I- N CO 0 e- 00 CO 6 N 4 Z — ~ 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 co e- e- M t0 O 0 e- N �" Z o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - M t0 N 0 W o o cfl 00 o co of o 0 O o r r m co co co 0 0 e- J ,-- r- co co CL• W � a � �= O. a v am 2 0 o o o o o o o o 0 O O — 0 0 0 0 0 0 (L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F-Z a N 00 0 O CO N 0 0 0 d- w cc (13 r r CO CO 0) - O CD0 0N W W M M Ln CL Q ,,--- I— N x x r • N CY) CO co CL 1-1-1 cli U mc Fe v. d' W W CO CO WN )C )C e- • N M 't tC 00 0 CO et w to M TABLE FOR MONTHLY CHARGES & PERCENT INCREASE COMPARISON CUSTOMERS WITH A 5/8 X 3/4" METER PROPOSED BASE RATE 2.1% INCREASE IN BASE RATE FROM $12.00 TO $12.25 (INCLUDES 0 GALS) PROPOSED COMMODITY 2.0% INCREASE IN TIER 1 FROM $1.90 TO$1.94 (0- 10,000 GALS) 2.0% INCREASE IN TIER 2 FROM $2.35 TO $2.40 (10,001 -25,000 GALS) RS-2 2.0% INCREASE IN TIER 3 FROM $3.00 TO $3.06 (OVER 25,000 GALS) CUSTOMERS PERCENT OF GALLONS CURRENT PROPOSED AMOUNT PERCENT IN USAGE CUSTOMER USED RATE RATE INCREASED INCREASED CATEGORY BASE 0 12.00 12.25 0.25 2.1 1,000 13.90 14.19 0.29 2.1 2,000 15.80 16.13 0.33 2.1 3,000 17.70 18.07 0.37 2.1 4,000 19.60 20.01 0.41 2.1 5,000 21.50 21.95 0.45 2.1 6,000 23.40 23.89 0.49 2.1 7,000 25.30 25.83 0.53 2.1 8,000 27.20 27.77 0.57 2.1 9,000 29.10 29.71 0.61 2.1 10,000 31.00 31.65 0.65 2.1 Average Residential Usage 11,000 33.35 34.05 0.70 2.1 12,000 35.70 36.45 0.75 2.1 13,000 38.05 38.85 0.80 2.1 As of 12/31/02 there were 14,000 40.40 41.25 0.85 2.1 14,646 residential customers whose 15,000 42.75 43.65 0.90 2.1 water use averaged 10,000 16,000 45.10 46.05 0.95 2.1 gallons of water per month. 17,000 47.45 48.45 1.00 2.1 18,000 49.80 50.85 1.05 2.1 These customers represent 19,000 52.15 53.25 1.10 2.1 93.6%of the total customer base. 20,000 54.50 55.65 1.15 2.1 21,000 56.85 58.05 1.20 2.1 22,000 59.20 60.45 1.25 2.1 23,000 61.55 62.85 1.30 2.1 24,000 63.90 65.25 1.35 2.1 25,000 66.25 67.65 1.40 2.1 26,000 69.25 70.71 1.46 2.1 27,000 72.25 73.77 1.52 2.1 28,000 75.25 76.83 1.58 2.1 29,000 78.25 79.89 1.64 2.1 30,000 81.25 82.95 1.70 2.1 31,000 84.25 86.01 1.76 2.1 32,000 87.25 89.07 1.82 2.1 33,000 90.25 92.13 1.88 2.1 34,000 93.25 95.19 1.94 2.1 35,000 96.25 98.25 2.00 2.1 36,000 99.25 101.31 2.06 2.1 37,000 102.25 104.37 2.12 2.1 38,000 105.25 107.43 2.18 2.1 39,000 108.25 110.49 2.24 2.1 40,000 111.25 113.55 2.30 2.1 RS-2 TABLE FOR MONTHLY CHARGES AND PERCENT INCREASE COMPARISON FOR CUSTOMERS WITH A 3/4"x 3/4" METER BASE RATE =$18.50 COMMODITY RATE: TIER 1 = $1.94 FOR 0 - 10,000 GALLONS TIER 2= $2.40 FOR 10,001 -25,000 GALLONS TIER 3 = $3.06 FOR USAGE OVER 25,000 GALLONS GALLONS BILL AT THE BILL AT THE AMOUNT OF PERCENT OF USED IN CURRENT PROPOSED INCREASE INCREASE 1 MONTH RATE RATE PER MONTH 0 18.00 18.50 0.50 2.8% 10,000 37.00 37.90 0.90 2.4% 25,000 72.25 73.90 1.65 2.3% 40,000 117.25 119.80 2.55 2.2% 50,000 147.25 150.40 3.15 2.1% TABLE FOR MONTHLY CHARGES AND PERCENT INCREASE COMPARISON FOR CUSTOMERS WITH A 1"METER BASE RATE = $30.75 COMMODITY RATE: TIER 1 =$1.94 FOR 0- 16,000 GALLONS TIER 2=$2.40 FOR 16,001 -27,000 GALLONS TIER 3 = $3.06 FOR USAGE OVER 27,000 GALLONS GALLONS BILL AT THE BILL AT THE AMOUNT OF PERCENT OF USED IN CURRENT PROPOSED INCREASE INCREASE 1 MONTH RATE RATE PER MONTH 0 30.01 30.75 0.74 2.5% 16,000 60.41 61.79 1.38 2.3% 27,000 86.26 88.19 1.93 2.2% 38,000 119.26 121.85 2.59 2.2% 50,000 155.26 158.57 3.31 2.1% TABLE FOR MONTHLY CHARGES AND PERCENT INCREASE COMPARISON FOR CUSTOMERS WITH A 1 1/2" METER BASE RATE _ $61.25 COMMODITY RATE: TIER 1 = $1.94 FOR 0-38,000 GALLONS TIER 2 = $2.40 FOR 38,001 -64,000 GALLONS TIER 3 = $3.06 FOR USAGE OVER 64,000 GALLONS GALLONS BILL AT THE BILL AT THE AMOUNT OF PERCENT OF USED IN CURRENT PROPOSED INCREASE INCREASE 1 MONTH RATE RATE PER MONTH 0 60.00 61.25 1.25 2.1% . 38,000 132.20 134.97 2.77 2.1% 64,000 193.30 197.37 4.07 2.1%, 90,000 271.30 276.93 5.63 2.1% 125,000 376.30 384.03 7.73 2.1% RS-2 TABLE FOR MONTHLY CHARGES AND PERCENT INCREASE COMPARISON FOR CUSTOMERS WITH A 2" METER BASE RATE = $98.00 COMMODITY RATE: TIER 1 = $1.94 FOR 0-80,000 GALLONS TIER 2 = $2.40 FOR 80,001 - 134,000 GALLONS TIER 3 = $3.06 FOR USAGE OVER 134,000 GALLONS GALLONS BILL AT THE BILL AT THE AMOUNT OF PERCENT OF USED IN CURRENT PROPOSED INCREASE INCREASE 1 MONTH RATE RATE PER MONTH 0 96.00 98.00 2.00 2.1% 80,000 248.00 253.20 5.20 2.1% 134,000 374.90 382.80 7.90 2.1% 275,000 797.90 814.26 16.36 2.1% 325,000 I 947.90 967.26 19.36_ 2.0% TABLE FOR MONTHLY CHARGES AND PERCENT INCREASE COMPARISON FOR CUSTOMERS WITH A 3" METER BASE RATE =$196.00 COMMODITY RATE: TIER 1 = $1.94 FOR 0- 186,000 GALLONS TIER 2 = $2.40 FOR 186,001 -311,000 GALLONS TIER 3 = $3.06 FOR USAGE OVER 311,000 GALLONS GALLONS BILL AT THE BILL AT THE AMOUNT OF PERCENT OF USED IN CURRENT PROPOSED INCREASE INCREASE 1 MONTH RATE RATE PER MONTH 0 192.00 196.00 4.00 2.1% 100,000 382.00 390.00 8.00 2.1% 186,000 545.40 556.84 11.44 2.1% 311,000 839.15 856.84 17.69 2.1% 450,000 1,256.15 1,282.18 26.03 2.1% TABLE FOR MONTHLY CHARGES AND PERCENT INCREASE COMPARISON FOR CUSTOMERS WITH A 4"METER BASE RATE = $306.00 COMMODITY RATE: TIER 1 = $1.94 FOR 0- 169,000 GALLONS TIER 2= $2.40 FOR 169,001 -283,000 GALLONS TIER 3=$3.06 FOR USAGE OVER 283,000 GALLONS GALLONS BILL AT THE BILL AT THE AMOUNT OF PERCENT OF USED IN CURRENT PROPOSED INCREASE INCREASE 1 MONTH RATE RATE ` PER MONTH 0 300.00 306.00 6.00 2.0% . 100,000 490.00 500.00 10.00 2.0% 169,000 621.10 7 633.86 , 12.76 2.1% 283,000 889.00 907.46 18.46 2.1% 350,000 1,090.00 1,112.48 22.48_ 2.1% RS-2 TABLE FOR MONTHLY CHARGES AND PERCENT INCREASE COMPARISON FOR CUSTOMERS WITH A 6" METER BASE RATE = $612.00 COMMODITY RATE: TIER 1 = $1.94 FOR 0- 1,800,000 GALLONS TIER 2 = $2.40 FOR 1,800,001 - 3,006,000 GALLONS TIER 3 = $3.06 FOR USAGE OVER 3,006,000 GALLONS GALLONS BILL AT THE BILL AT THE AMOUNT OF PERCENT OF USED IN CURRENT PROPOSED INCREASE INCREASE 1 MONTH RATE RATE PER MONTH 0 600.00 612.00 12.00 2.0% 1,000,000 2,500.00 2,552.00 52.00 2.1% 1,800,000 4,020.00 4,104.00 84.00 2.1% 3,000,000 6,840.00 6,984.00 144.00 2.1% 5,000,000 12,836.10 13,100.04 263.94 2.1% TABLE FOR MONTHLY CHARGES AND PERCENT INCREASE COMPARISON FOR CUSTOMERS WITH A 8" METER BASE RATE = $1,224.00 COMMODITY RATE: TIER 1 =$1.94 FOR 0- 1,800,000 GALLONS TIER 2 = $2.40 FOR 1,800,001 -3,006,000 GALLONS TIER 3 = $3.06 FOR USAGE OVER 3,006,000 GALLONS GALLONS BILL AT THE BILL AT THE AMOUNT OF PERCENT OF USED IN CURRENT PROPOSED INCREASE INCREASE 1 MONTH RATE RATE PER MONTH 0 1,200.00 1,224.00 24.00 2.0% 1,000,000 3,100.00 3,164.00 64.00 2.1% 1,800,000 4,620.00 4,716.00 96.00 2.1% 3,000,000 7,440.00 7,596.00 156.00 2.1% 5,000,000 13,436.10 13,721.04 284.94 2.1% GOLF COURSE CONSERVATION RATES TO BECOME EFFECTIVE WHEN USAGE EXCEEDS THE ARIZONA DEPT. OF WATER RESOURCES ANNUAL ALLOTMENT. • F- -J (!) 8M Q Q O c t0 CO tO CO CO CO CO CO CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � � oMMMMMMMthM C4 O w a 0 a ICI - H Cl) o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z 0 co Cl) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CI Ili �W/ O w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W a.Q N N N Cotoc 00 o 0 LL W o cii cYi o f c6 c6 c~i ci i c6 (.6 p r M N 0 0 0 M M U O w J ce m ? m a' m m a� m a' 0 a O M n' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z O I- J Z F- W F- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 Z o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (/) N O O O O O o 0 0 0 -- CO N 0 0 Q Q p _l W N N N CO M CO O O a 2 W o "4!; 1' 1" 1' Q 0 m H N N N N N N N N N 0 M M Q Q W U > >0 >00 00 a U a 00 00 00 Wo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0.0 0 0o O 0 0 Ce ~ F- J W N N e- 0 00 0 0 = W Q N 0 C[ 0 (/) N M N o 0 t'7 r • M W CD W O M M M leo) M M M M IA) 0 a Q N N N N N N N N N c r' O `O r- g 1= w J ca D I- • • • • • • • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -� Ce n — U OW 1- mo o co 00 0 0 0 0 0 MEIN 0 A 0 U w 0 d. e- ,c T ch oO ec to 000 CO0 .. � 0 _ 'o 2 Z W � vUj Oo — UN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i- Liu WE �? 0 �- vj W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 B E 0 ", r- J (l) W I- tri r` ,t v cCi co co O W — U Q� Q Q = Z j Z N N N Cfl co �- co o O 1U <g W ,- co N O O >- c C) v) Q Q g o ter` Tr /i�+ ter` �+ J 0 CO C) W g C) ._ W a W O a/ c/ V• 07 07 al 07 a? aI U J Ct 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 J J W r- a-- 0 I- ' r- Z -J , 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U) RI g ce O W W C7 U o o co 00 o co ai 0 0 >• ZQ L 'W^ 0. () a 0 r co co CO co aoo^ C.CO Q Q IL• O v, U) r r CO D O Q a N >- F- I- J W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J Z r (0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O w 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' M 0 0 0 0 0 Wo a) a) a) am rn a) a) a) rn C a co.. co., O c r r r r r r r r •,-- CI U Q W m it 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a -.1 F o U 7 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 — ce o w cOo0000000 U) in 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W I N CO O O CO cV 0 0 0 Z '- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • is r. co co O O 0 0 0 L- 000000000 0) r- M CD N 0 W o o co 00 o co ai o 0 O o T- r ch 0.o 0.o cfl o 0 CL ,WA u) r- J r ,- co co O 8 Q a• mc 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O O — o 0 0 0 0 0 W c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W~ Q N co O O cD N 0 0 0 �- as ,-- r co CD a� a) O CO N Ce W W co M C 0 _ I— N X X ,-- • N M ,t' cD c0 Ln co Uc E W▪ W M M WcoNIn X X r N M ' CO 00 1 (n ' M RS-3 TABLE FOR MONTHLY CHARGES AND PERCENT INCREASE COMPARISON FOR CUSTOMERS WITH A 3/4"x 3/4" METER BASE RATE = $18.00 COMMODITY RATE: TIER 1 = $1.94 FOR 0- 10,000 GALLONS TIER 2 = $2.40 FOR 10,001 -25,000 GALLONS TIER 3 = $3.06 FOR USAGE OVER 25,000 GALLONS GALLONS BILL AT THE BILL AT THE AMOUNT OF PERCENT OF USED IN CURRENT PROPOSED INCREASE INCREASE 1 MONTH RATE RATE PER MONTH 0 18.00 18.00 0.00 0.0% 10,000 37.00 37.40 0.40 1.1% 25,000 72.25 73.40 1.15 1.6% 40,000 117.25 119.30 2.05 1.7% 50,000 147.25 156.70 9.45 6.4% TABLE FOR MONTHLY CHARGES AND PERCENT INCREASE COMPARISON FOR CUSTOMERS WITH A 1" METER BASE RATE = $30.01 COMMODITY RATE: TIER 1 = $1.94 FOR 0- 16,000 GALLONS TIER 2 = $2.40 FOR 16,001 -27,000 GALLONS TIER 3 =$3.06 FOR USAGE OVER 27,000 GALLONS GALLONS BILL AT THE BILL AT THE AMOUNT OF PERCENT OF USED IN CURRENT PROPOSED INCREASE INCREASE 1 MONTH RATE RATE PER MONTH 0 30.01 30.01 0.00 0.0% 16,000 60.41 61.05 0.64 1.1% 27,000 86.26 87.45 1.19 1.4% 38,000 119.26 121.11 1.85 1.6% 50,000 155.26 156.83 1.57 1.0% TABLE FOR MONTHLY CHARGES AND PERCENT INCREASE COMPARISON FOR CUSTOMERS WITH A 1 1/2" METER BASE RATE = $60.00 COMMODITY RATE: TIER 1 = $1.94 FOR 0-38,000 GALLONS TIER 2 =$2.40 FOR 38,001 -64,000 GALLONS TIER 3 =$3.06 FOR USAGE OVER 64,000 GALLONS GALLONS BILL AT THE BILL AT THE AMOUNT OF PERCENT OF USED IN CURRENT PROPOSED INCREASE INCREASE 1 MONTH RATE RATE PER MONTH 0 60.00 60.00 0.00 0.0% 38,000 132.20 133.72 1.52 1.1%, 64,000 193.30 196.12 2.82 1.5% 90,000 271.30 275.68 4.38 1.6% 125,000 376.30 382.78 6.48 1.7% TABLE FOR MONTHLY CHARGES & PERCENT INCREASE COMPARISON CUSTOMERS WITH A 5/8 X 3/4"METER PROPOSED BASE RATE 0% INCREASE IN BASE RATE REMAINS AT$12.00 (INCLUDES 0 GALS) PROPOSED COMMODITY 2.0% INCREASE IN TIER 1 FROM $1.90 TO$1.94 ( 0- 10,000 GALS) 2.0% INCREASE IN TIER 2 FROM $2.35 TO $2.40 (10,001 25,000 GALS) RS-3 2.0% INCREASE IN TIER 3 FROM $3.00 TO $3.06 (OVER 25,000 GALS) CUSTOMERS PERCENT OF GALLONS CURRENT PROPOSED AMOUNT PERCENT IN USAGE CUSTOMER USED RATE RATE INCREASED INCREASED CATEGORY BASE 0 12.00 12.00 0.00 0.0 1,000 13.90 13.94 0.04 0.3 2,000 15.80 15.88 0.08 0.5 3,000 17.70 17.82 0.12 0.7 4,000 19.60 19.76 0.16 0.8 1 5,000 21.50 21.70 0.20 0.9 6,000 23.40 23.64 0.24 1.0 7,000 25.30 25.58 0.28 1.1 8,000 27.20 27.52 0.32 1.2 9,000 29.10 29.46 0.36 1.2 . 10,000 31.00 31.40 0.40 1.3 E- Average Residential Usage 11,000 33.35 33.80 0.45 1.3 12,000 35.70 36.20 0.50 1.4 13,000 38.05 38.60 0.55 1.4 As of 12/31/02 there were 14,000 40.40 41.00 0.60 1.5 14,646 residential customers whose 15,000 42.75 43.40 0.65 1.5 water use averaged 10,000 16,000 45.10 45.80 0.70 1.6 gallons of water per month. 17,000 47.45 48.20 0.75 1.6 18,000 49.80 50.60 0.80 1.6 These customers represent 19,000 52.15 53.00 0.85 1.6 93.6%of the total customer base. 20,000 54.50 55.40 0.90 1.7 21,000 56.85 57.80 0.95 1.7 22,000 59.20 60.20 1.00 1.7 23,000 61.55 62.60 1.05 1.7 24,000 63.90 65.00 1.10 1.7 25,000 66.25 67.40 1.15 1.7 26,000 69.25 70.46 1.21 1.7 27,000 72.2573.52 1.27 1.8 _ 28,000 75.25 76.58 1.33 1.8 29,000 78.25 79.64 1.39 1.8 30,000 81.25 82.70 1.45 1.8 31,000 84.25 85.76 1.51 1.8 32,000 87.25 88.82 1.57 1.8 33,000 90.25 91.88 1.63 1.8 34,000 93.25 94.94 1.69 1.8 35,000 96.25 98.00 1.75 1.8 36,000 99.25 101.06 1.81 1.8 37,000 102.25 104.12 1.87 1.8 38,000 105.25 107.18 1.93 1.8 39,000 108.25 110.24 1.99 1.8 40,000 111.25 113.30 2.05 1.8_ RS-3 TABLE FOR MONTHLY CHARGES AND PERCENT INCREASE COMPARISON FOR CUSTOMERS WITH A 2" METER BASE RATE =$96.00 COMMODITY RATE: TIER 1 = $1.94 FOR 0-80,000 GALLONS TIER 2 = $2.40 FOR 80,001 - 134,000 GALLONS TIER 3 =$3.06 FOR USAGE OVER 134,000 GALLONS GALLONS BILL AT THE BILL AT THE AMOUNT OF PERCENT OF USED IN CURRENT PROPOSED INCREASE INCREASE 1 MONTH RATE RATE PER MONTH 0 96.00 96.00 0.00 0.0% 80,000 248.00 251.20 3.20 1.3% 134,000 374.90 380.80 5.90 1.6% 275,000 797.90 812.26 14.36 1.8% 325,000 947.90 965.26 17.36 1.8% TABLE FOR MONTHLY CHARGES AND PERCENT INCREASE COMPARISON FOR CUSTOMERS WITH A 3"METER BASE RATE = $192.00 COMMODITY RATE: TIER 1 = $1.94 FOR 0- 186,000 GALLONS TIER 2 =$2.40 FOR 186,001 -311,000 GALLONS TIER 3 =$3.06 FOR USAGE OVER 311,000 GALLONS GALLONS BILL AT THE BILL AT THE AMOUNT OF PERCENT OF USED IN CURRENT PROPOSED INCREASE INCREASE 1 MONTH RATE RATE PER MONTH 0 192.00 192.00 0.00 0.0% 100,000 382.00 386.00 4.00 1.0%V 186,000 545.40 552.84 7.44 1.4% 311,000 839.15 852.84 13.69 1.6% 450,000 1,256.15 1,278.18 22.03 1.8% TABLE FOR MONTHLY CHARGES AND PERCENT INCREASE COMPARISON FOR CUSTOMERS WITH A 4"METER BASE RATE = $300.00 COMMODITY RATE: TIER 1 =$1.94 FOR 0- 169,000 GALLONS TIER 2=$2.40 FOR 169,001 -283,000 GALLONS TIER 3 =$3.06 FOR USAGE OVER 283,000 GALLONS GALLONS BILL AT THE BILL AT THE AMOUNT OF PERCENT OF USED IN CURRENT PROPOSED INCREASE INCREASE 1 MONTH RATE RATE PER MONTH 0 300.00 300.00 0.00 0.0% 100,000 490.00 494.00 4.00 0.8% 169,000 621.10 _ 627.86 6.76 1.1% 283,000 889.00 901.46 12.46 1.4% 350,000 1,090.00 1,106.48 16.48 1.5% RS-3 TABLE FOR MONTHLY CHARGES AND PERCENT INCREASE COMPARISON FOR CUSTOMERS WITH A 6" METER BASE RATE =$600.00 COMMODITY RATE: TIER 1 =$1.94 FOR 0- 1,800,000 GALLONS TIER 2 = $2.40 FOR 1,800,001 -3,006,000 GALLONS TIER 3 = $3.06 FOR USAGE OVER 3,006,000 GALLONS GALLONS BILL AT THE BILL AT THE AMOUNT OF PERCENT OF USED IN CURRENT PROPOSED INCREASE INCREASE 1 MONTH RATE RATE PER MONTH 0 600.00 600.00 0.00 0.0% 1,000,000 2,500.00 2,540.00 40.00 1.6% 1,800,000 4,020.00 4,092.00 72.00 1.8% 3,000,000 6,840.00 6,972.00 132.00 1.9% 5,000,000 12,836.10 13,088.04 _ 251.94 2.0% TABLE FOR MONTHLY CHARGES AND PERCENT INCREASE COMPARISON FOR CUSTOMERS WITH A 8" METER BASE RATE = $1,200.00 COMMODITY RATE: TIER 1 = $1.94 FOR 0- 1,800,000 GALLONS TIER 2=$2.40 FOR 1,800,001 -3,006,000 GALLONS TIER 3=$3.06 FOR USAGE OVER 3,006,000 GALLONS GALLONS BILL AT THE BILL AT THE AMOUNT OF PERCENT OF USED IN CURRENT PROPOSED INCREASE INCREASE 1 MONTH RATE RATE PER MONTH 0 1,200.00 1,200.00 0.00 0.0% 1,000,000 3,100.00 3,140.00 40.00 1.3% 1,800,000 4,620.00 4,692.00 72.00 1.6% 3,000,000 7,440.00 7,572.00 132.00 1.8% 5,000,000 13,436.10 13,697.04 260.94 1.9% GOLF COURSE CONSERVATION RATES TO BECOME EFFECTIVE WHEN USAGE EXCEEDS THE ARIZONA DEPT. OF WATER RESOURCES ANNUAL ALLOTMENT. APPENDIX H SERVICE FEES & CHARGES ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY SERVICE FEES AND CHARGES HYDRANT METER DEPOSIT The Oro Valley Water Utility recommends increasing the amount of the Hydrant Meter Deposit. The existing deposit is not sufficient to recover the utility's cost to replace a lost or broken hydrant meter. The Hydrant Meter Deposit is paid by the contractor/developer upon application for a hydrant meter. The deposit accrues interest at a rate of 5% per year. Refund of the deposit is predicated on the return of the hydrant meter in satisfactory condition and payment of the final water bill. The utility's cost to purchase a hydrant meter: $1,184.68 Existing Hydrant Meter Deposit: $ 750.00 Proposed Hydrant Meter Deposit: $1,200.00 ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY SERVICE FEES AND CHARGES NEW DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION FEES The Oro Valley Water Utility recommends establishing a fee to recover the personnel costs to provide new development construction inspection. The utility employs two full time construction inspectors to monitor the installation of water lines installed by and for developers to provide water service throughout their development projects. Other costs are incurred for assistance from a Utility Service Operator III and administrative support from the Senior Civil Engineering Technician and the Water Utility Director. The utility would also include the pressure testing costs and the laboratory cost to perform bacteria testing on the water lines prior to connecting the new facilities to the existing water distribution system. Establishment of the new development construction inspection fee is in keeping with the Town's policy that "new development pays for itself'. The proposed fees were derived by using current wages plus a 3% allowance for COLA and merit increases in FY 2003-2004 and a benefit factor of 30%. The construction inspectors average 8.25 hours inspecting a 500 foot section of water main. The Utility Service Operator III averages 4.50 hours per project assisting with the connection of the new mains to the existing system. The Senior Civil Engineering Technician provides operational support of approximately .75 hours per project and the Utility Director provides administrative support of approximately .50 hours per project. The laboratory costs are actual costs incurred for testing. The following table itemizes the costs to be recovered: PROPOSED NEW DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION FEES Length Constr. Sr. Civil Util. Svc. Utility Lab Of Water Inspector Eng.Tech. Op.III Director Cost Total Proposed Main $24.46/Hr $24.46/Hr. $21.87/Hr. $61.02/Hr. $18.00/Test Cost Fee (in feet) 0- 500 $201.80 $18.35 $98.42 $30.51 $18.00 $367.08 $365.00 501-1000 $403.59 $18.35 $98.42 $30.51 $36.00 $586.87 $585.00 1001-1500 $605.39 $18.35 $98.42 $30.51 $54.00 $806.67 $805.00 1501-2000 $807.18 $18.35 $98.42 $30.51 $72.00 $1026.46 $1025.00 2001-2500 $1008.98 $18.35 $98.42 $30.51 $90.00 $1246.26 $1245.00 2501-3000 $1210.77 $18.35 $98.42 $30.51 $108.00 $1466.05 $1465.00 3001-3500 $1412.57 $18.35 $98.42 $30.51 $126.00 $1685.85 $1685.00 3501-4000 $1614.36 $18.35 $98.42 $30.51 $144.00 $1905.64 $1905.00 4001-4500 $1816.16 $18.35 $98.42 $30.51 $162.00 $2125.44 $2125.00 4501-5000 $2017.95 $18.35 $98.42 $30.51 $180.00 $2345.23 $2345.00 Proposed fee for repeat pressure tests: $60.00 per test (Const. Insp. 2.50 hrs. @ $24.46/hr. = $61.15) Proposed fee for repeat bacteria tests: $75.00 per test (Const. Insp. 2.25 hrs. @ $24.46/hr. + $18.00 lab= $73.04) All proposed fees to be collected prior to project acceptance. ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY SERVICE FEES AND CHARGES NEW DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW FEES The Oro Valley Water Utility recommends establishing a fee to recover the personnel costs to provide new development plan review. The utility reviews new development plans prior to a developer constructing water lines for their project. There are two components to new development plan review. The utility performs a hydraulic review, which includes computer modeling, to determine if the proposed project can be adequately served by the utility. After the construction plans are completed, they are presented to the utility for design review to insure that the proposed project will be constructed pursuant to the utility's specifications. Establishment of the new development plan review fees is in keeping with the Town's policy that "new development pays for itself'. The hydraulic review and the design review are proposed to have two separate fee schedules since the two reviews can be performed at different times. The proposed fees were derived by using current wages plus a 3% allowance for COLA and merit increases in FY 2003-2004 and a benefit factor of 30%. The hydraulic review is performed by the Engineering Division Administrator who averages .50 hours per project and the Senior Civil Engineering Technician whose time varies depending on the number of sheets contained in the set of plans. The proposed fees for hydraulic plans include two reviews. The following table itemizes the costs to be recovered: PROPOSED NEW DEVELOPMENT HYDRAULIC REVIEW FEES Sr. Civil Eng.Div. Eng.Tech. Admin. Total Proposed $24.46/Hr. $41.16/Hr. Cost Fee 1 Sheet $134.53 $20.58 $155.11 $155.00 2 Sheets $158.99 $20.58 $179.57 $180.00 3 Sheets $183.45 $20.58 $204.03 $205.00 4 Sheets $207.91 $20.58 $228.49 $230.00 Proposed fee for more than 2 reviews: $85.00 per additional review Proposed fees to be collected prior to receipt of approved plans. Page 1 of 2 NEW DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW FEES continued The design or construction review is performed by the Engineering Division Administrator who averages 1.0 hour per project and the Senior Civil Engineering Technician whose time varies depending on the number of sheets contained in the set of plans. Additionally the Water Operations Superintendent averages approximately 1.0 hour to review the plans and the Utility Director averages .50 hours to perform the final review and approval. The Engineering Aide spends 2.0 hours preparing the Line Extension Agreement for each project. The proposed fees for design plans include two reviews. The following table itemizes the costs to be recovered: PROPOSED NEW DEVELOPMENT DESIGN REVIEW FEES Sr. Civil Eng.Div. Engineer. Water Ops Utility Eng.Tech. Admin. Aide Supt. Director Total Proposed $24.46/Hr $41.16/Hr $20.90/Hr $37.90/Hr. $61.02/Hr. Cost Fee 1 Sheet $110.07 $41.16 $41.80 $37.90 $30.51 $261.44 $260.00 2 Sheets $122.30 $41.16 $41.80 $37.90 $30.51 $273.67 $275.00 3 Sheets $134.53 $41.16 $41.80 $37.90 $30.51 $285.90 $285.00 4 Sheets $146.76 $41.16 $41.80 $37.90 $30.51 $298.13 $300.00 Proposed fee for more than 2 reviews: $85.00 per additional review Proposed fees to be collected prior to receipt of approved plans. Page 2 of 2 APPENDIX I UTILITY STATISTICS FOR 2002 i � • • • • • • r • • • • Utility Statistics for Calendar Year 2002 New Meters Installed 445 if # Services Established 2,532 • Services Terminated 2,584 • Service Orders Processed: • Meter re-reads 215 Waterualit 57 a y IP Water pressure 108 Meter replacements 42 Service repairs 26 Leaks 181 Other 112 • Total service orders: 741 741 • Total Water Pumped 3,299,433,627 gallons 10,125.59 acre feet • Total Water Delivered 3,196,819 889 gallons � 9,810.68 acre feet •• • Lost & Unaccounted For Water* 84,206,415 gallons 258.42 acre feet 2.63 0/0 • • *ADWR allows a maximum of up to 10%to maintain compliance status. AP IIP - i Accounts By User Type As of December 31, 2002 15,093 •Construction - 1% f 0 Commercial - 1% 11. ■Residential - 96% • 111 ■Irrigation -2% ■Turf - 0% • 193 327 191 9 i 11110 i • Gallons Sold By User Type January - December 2002 4 4111 • •Construction-2% • 223,757,000 1,850,119,000 /r� ❑Commercial-5% Iwo �,�.. 1111111/00 ■Residential- 58% 911,590,000 ■Irrigation -7% 48,911,000 g L 159,249,000 •Turf - 28% • IP ElbRevenue By User Type January - December 2002 707 948 $1,202,338 ,$215.213 ■Construction- 3% $518,387 0 Commercial-6% • ■Residential-69% ■Irrigation-8% E $5,869,994 ■Turf - 14% • 9 a • I 41 • Customers by Meter Size & User Type As of December 31, 2002 100 % — L._ / / 0 / . / , / / 1 8O% a , , , ,, , , , , , ! . ,, 60% —"J , ,i 41 41 410 40% ; 1 •0 ...._ • • _:20% -"i ! ,..,.: . 0 0 , immyr r . a f a ..._..J _ ,, _____L„..„ ,,411, 0 0/0 ' ' 5/8" 3/4" 1 ' 1.5' ' 2" 3" 4'` 6" • ■Turf I , 1 1 2 5 411/ ■Construction 152 17 4 18 II ■Irrigation 119 102 32 68 3 3 p '0 28 46 32 � 79 6 2 0 Commerciali 4. IN Residential 14,693 131 I 181 44 r 41 ! 2 1 , Totals 14,992 131 346 108 193 28 7 8 .. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 3 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: April 2, 2003 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Bryant Nodine, AICP, Planning and Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT OF MEMBER TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SUMMARY: Due to the resignation of Mr. Bill Matsukado, there exists one vacancy on the Planning and Zoning Commission. Using the process established in the Town Council Policies and Procedures, an interview panel, consisting of Council Member Werner Wolff, Liaison to the Planning and Zoning Commission; Mr. Bill Moody, Chair of the Planning and Zoning Commission; and Bryant Nodine, Planning and Zoning Administrator, interviewed six, well-qualified, citizens who applied to serve on the Commission. As a result of the interviews, the interview panel recommends Mr. Pete Bistany, a recent graduate of the Citizen Planning Institute, to fill the unexpired term of Mr. Matsukado. SUGGESTED MOTIONS: I move to appoint Mr. Pete Bistany to fill the remainder of the term of Mr. Matsukado, with this term expiring on June 30, 2004. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Applicant Resumes and Letters h..,.....,7:72 1 i ....._ Planni '. Zonin: A dministrator / i ., '/- Community Development Director 41)-,-PA A4A.4-, Town Manager F:\Admin PZ\P&Z Commission\PZC appointment to TC.doc .. • t ($TRIBUTED • • t � ORO VALLEY B A,RD ,�.., k‘MANAGER O /COP lg. - 1.- FILE COUNCIL Dear Oro Valley t3 OTHER Citizen: We appreciate your interest in the Town of Oro Valley. Enclosed is an informational form which when complete will allow us to quickly process your application. While the information asked for is optional, your supplying the information will greatly assist in an understandir of education, experience and background to allow the best possible use of your talents whichY ou are so kind willing to provide to the Town of Oro Valley and for which we thank you. Please return to the Town Clerk's Office, 11,000 North La Canada Drive, Oro Valley, Arizona 85737. YY Name + Last First Middle Home Address9ct Business Address Home Phone ? Business Phone iilber of Years in Oro Valleyt A4 c S 0 Signature Date Please state which board/commission you wish to join and why. RAA-4 k-L.A. -' AA 1 S k L-- ti � -tip c cimA k cA_.) - El---=3 c__\ t41-4 C Ck-2S..1 S Please list other community, civic. professional,social, educational, cultural or athletic organizations you have bee affiliated with, length of time, any office held, and any achievements in those organizations you feel al noteworthy. r , What vou'consider your highest responsibility, skill or achievement: professionally and/or personally, and why-. EMPLOYMENT Please list previous employment. List your past or present employment first: 1 1/4/NA 1, Ti , Atii 7 4 �SL.1 . c Dates of Employment Company Name& Address 1. TC Riud. 3. 4. 5. (List Position&Job Description in numbered order as listed above) R rT v44 fLA EDUCATION Briefly describe your educational background: Institution/School Degree Received 1. )—:;F 5 1 1 1 • • 4^ 4. 5. Area of Study in numbered order as listed above: �.- Other fields of study,professional institutes,training program, etc: i --- a IF DESIRED, FURTHER INFORMATION MAY BE ATTACHED • PETER J. BISTANY 993E Crown Ridge Dr. Telephone: 520 818 6658 Tucson, AZ 85737 email: gailwinds@msn.com SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS Educated and experienced in real estate management, purchasing management, and program management. Proficient in problem solving, communications and managerial techniques. PERSONAL DATA Military Lieutenant Colonel (United States Army Retired) 1980 Awards Bronze Star,Purple Heart, Joint Services Commendation Medal, and Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal-Korea. Education Master of Science in Administration--Procurement and Contracting Major, George Washington University, 1974. Bachelor of Science in Business Administration--Marketing Major, Seton Hall University, 1960. United States Army Command and General Staff College, 1969. Memberships Alpha Kappa Psi,Professional Business Fraternity Military Order of Purple Heart The Retired Officers' Association Civic Association of Sun City Vistoso Inc. VIP Investment Club, Sun City EXPERIENCE Real Estate Broker/Appraiser Performed real estate and appraisal functions as a New Jersey licensed Real Estate Broker and as a State certified member of the National Association of Independent Fee Appriasers,to include Real Property Assessments. Recently obtained an Arizona Real Estate Salesperson license(to be activated). Construction Obtained State of New Jersey Building Contractor's License and accomplished selected construction of houses and commercail buildings, 1984-1992. Management Served as managing director of a large organization. Developed programs involving safety,recreation,and training. Prepared,administered and monitored employee appraisal and promotion programs and developed job specifications to fill positions within the organization in fulfillment of organization goals and objectives. Program Manager Served as Chief,Program Management,conducting all programming,financial and budgetary functions. Initiated all actions relating to acquisition of funds to support the Project budget. Established project milestones, costs analysis and critical path(PERT)project assessments. Procurement Manager Served as Chief of Procurement involving annual expenditures of millions of dollars for supplies, services, and minor construction. Performed contract administration including execution and negotiation of contracts. Reviewed contract specifications for completeness and contracting adequacy. ry TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: April 2, 2003 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Kathryn Cuvelier, CMC Town Clerk SUBJECT: ELECTION OF VICE MAYOR SUMMARY: Section 2-1-4 of the Oro Valley Town Code states that "At the first regular meeting in January of each calendar year, the Town Council shall elect one of its members as Vice-Mayor by a majority vote. Those Council Members eligible each January are only those whose terms will not expire in June of that calendar year." Those eligible for consideration are: Council Member Abbott Council Member Johnson (current Vice Mayor) Council Member Rochman Council Member Wolff The Vice-Mayor shall serve at the pleasure of the Council for a term of one year or until a successor is elected. 'Term effective April 2, 2003 —December 31, 2003.) ATTACHMENTS: 1. Oro Valley Town Code, Section 2-1-4 Office of Vice Mayor RECOMMENDATIONS: None. SUGGESTED MOTION: Mayor Loomis will open/close nominations. I MOVE to Elect as Vice-Mayor effective April 2, 2003 —December 31, 2003. Depattment Head . _. _:�► �.. Town Manager Section 2-1-4 Office of Vice-Mayor A. Election. At the first regular meeting in January of each calendar year, the Town Council shall elect one of its members as Vice-Mayor by a majority vote. Those Council Members eligible each January are only those whose terms will not expire in June of that calendar year. B. Term. The Vice-Mayor shall serve at the pleasure of the Council for a term of one (1)years or until a successor is elected. C. Duties. The Vice-Mayor shall be appointed to perform the duties of the Mayor during his absence,pursuant to ARS 9-236. The Vice-Mayor's compensation in this instance shall be increased to match that of the compensation of the Mayor. In the event of a vacancy in the office of Mayor, the Vice- Mayor shall succeed to the office of Mayor until the end of the term to which the Vice-Mayor was elected or the end of the term to which the Mayor was elected,whichever comes first, and then a new Vice-Mayor shall be elected. (03-06,Amended,02/19/2003;01-22A,Amended,09/19/2001;01-22,Amended,09/19/2001) Page 1 of 1