Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPackets - Council Packets (1339) AGENDA ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION APRIL 17, 2002 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11,000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL EXECUTIVE SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM Pursuant to ARS 38-431 .03 (A)(3) consultation with the Town Attorney relating to the confidentiality of the Executive Session RESUME REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS —TOWN MANAGER The Mayor and Council may consider and/or take action on the items listed below: ORDER OF BUSINESS: MAYOR WILL REVIEW THE ORDER OF THE MEETING CALL TO AUDIENCE — At this time, any member of the public is allowed to address the Mayor and Town Council on any issue not listed on today's agenda. Pursuant to the Arizona Open Meeting Law, individual Council Members may ask the Town Manager to review the matter, ask that the matter bep laced on a future agenda, or respond to comments made by speakers. However, the Mayor and Council may not take legal action on matters raised during "Call to Audience." Any items must be addressed to the whole Council, not a specific member. In order to speak during "Call to Audience", please specify whatY ou wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. 1. CONSENT AGENDA (Consideration and/or possible action) A. Minutes — 04/03/02 B. Public Information Report — March 2002 C. Building Safety Activity Report— March 2002 D. Coyote Run Monthly Report— March 2002 E. Economic Development Activity Report — March 2002 04/17/02 Agenda, Council Regular Session 2 F. Project No. OV-20-03-01 Award of contract for Oro Valley Water Utility Big Wash Water Plant D & E Zone Booster Station Upgrades to West Point Contractors, Inc., in the amount of $684,600.00 G. Project No. OV-20-01-02 Award of contract for Oro Valley Water Utility Rehabilitation/Re-Equipping of Oro Valley Well C-4 to Gilbert Pump & Equipment Company in the amount of$87,000.00 H. Resolution No. (R)02-30 Approval of a Line Extension Agreement between the Town of Oro Valley & Monterey Homes Construction, LLC to design and install water facilities at Mira Vista, Lots 1 — 60 in accordance with Oro Valley Plan No. OV12-99-19W I. Approval of proposed settlement of Citizens for Open Government v. Town of Oro Valley, U.S. District Court Cause No. CIV 01-393 Tuc-Frz J. Resolution (R)02-31 - Project No. OV30 00/01 09 Award of Bid for Saguaro Relocation for La Canada Extension: Tangerine to Moore Road 2. PRESENTATION OF A PLAQUE OF APPRECIATION TO DEAN MCCOOK FOR HIS SERVICE ON THE ORO VALLEY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION 3. PUBLIC HEARING-ORDINANCE NO. (0)02-12 AMENDING CHAPTER 6, BUILDING, OF THE ORO VALLEY TOWN CODE, SECTION 6-1-4, ADOPTION OF UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE; PROVIDING FOR FEE AMENDMENTS TO THE UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE AND TOWN OF ORO VALLEY AMENDMENTS TO THE UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (Declared a Public Record on March 6, 2002) 4. PUBLIC HEARING — ORDINANCE (0) 02-13, OV7-01-05 AMENDING CHAPTER 14, ARTICLE 14-2 ET SEQ. LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION AND BUFFER YARD PLANS AND ALL REFERENCE THERETO, CHAPTER 2 DEFINITIONS, AND ARTICLE 16-1 DESIGN GUIDELINES OF THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED (Declared a Public Record on February 20, 2002) Explanation: The six major categories of amendments proposed include; 1) Applicability, 2) Off-Street Parking, 3) Screening Requirements, 4) Addendum A, Oro Valley Approved Plant List, and 5) Design Guidelines, and 6) Buffer Yards. 04/17/02 Agenda, Council Regular Session 3 5. OV12-96-04C PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR RAMS CANYON PHASE III; LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 1.5 MILES NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF ORACLE ROAD AND FIRST AVENUE ON THE EAST SIDE OF ORACLE ROAD IN THE LA RESERVE PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT, PARCEL #2200401 OH Explanation: The applicant is requesting approval of their preliminary plat consisting of a 21 lot subdivision on approximately 4.85 acres. The proposed development is located east of Oracle Road and just north of Rams Field Pass. The zoning for this site is Campus Park Industrial, with residential permitted under the cumulative zoning enabled in the Oracle Road Scenic Corridor Overlay District. 6. OV12-00-07 EXTENSION OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE RITZ- CARLTON RESORT AT STONE CANYON BEING A PORTION OF THE 54.49 ACRE SITE FOR 20 CONDOMINIUMS (9.64 ACRES) AND 23 VILLAS (7.92 ACRES), LOCATED NORTHWEST OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD OFF TORTOLITA MOUNTAIN DRIVE, PARCELS 219-050-10B, 219-191-96C AND 219-200-02B Explanation: The applicant is requesting a six month extension of their Preliminary Plat to October 18, 2002. 7. CONSIDERATION AND/OR POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING THE MODIFICATION TO THE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE 2020 SCHEDULE AND STATUS REPORT #5 TOWN MANAGER'S REPORT CALL TO AUDIENCE —At this time, any member of the public is allowed to address the Mayor and Town Council on any issue not listed on today's agenda. Pursuant to the Arizona Open Meeting Law, individual Council Members may ask the Town Manager to review the matter, ask that the matter bep laced on a future agenda, or respond to comments made by speakers. However, the Mayor and Council may not take legal action on matters raised during "Call to Audience." Any items must be addressed to the whole Council, not a specific member. In order to speak during "Call to Audience", please specify whatY ou wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. ADJOURNMENT POSTED: 04/10/02 4:30 p.m. Ih 04/17/02 Agenda, Council Regular Session 4 Agacket of agenda materials as listed above is available for public inspection at p least 24 hoursp rior to the Council meeting in the office of the Town Clerk between the hours of 8:00 a.m. — 5:00p.m. The Town of Oro Valley complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If any person with a disability needs any type of accommodation, please notify Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk, at 229-4700. INSTRUCTIONS TO SPEAKERS Members of thep ublic have the right to speak during any posted public hearing. However, those items not listed as a public hearing are for � consideration and action by the Town Council during the course of their business meeting. Members of the public may be allowed to speak on these topics at the discretion of the Chair. IfY ou wish to address the Town Council on any item(s) on this agenda, please p a complete speaker card located on the Agenda table at the back of the room p andg ive it to the Town Clerk. Please indicate on the speaker card which item number and topic you wish to speak on, or if you wish to speak during "Call to Audience", please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. Please step forward to the podium when the Mayor announces the item(s) on the agenda which you are interested in addressing. 1. Please state your name and address for the record. 2. Speak onlyon the issue currently being discussed by Council. Please p organize your speech, you will only be allowed to address the Council g once regarding the topic being discussed. 3. Please limit your comments to 3 minutes. 4. During "Call to Audience" you may address the Council on any issue you wish. 5. Any member of the public speaking must speak in a courteous and respectful manner to those present. Thank you for your cooperation. A DRAFT MINUTES ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION APRIL 03, 2002 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11,000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER 6:05 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Paul Loomis, Mayor Fran LaSala, Council Member Bart Rochman, Council Member Werner Wolff, Council Member EXCUSED: Dick Johnson, Vice Mayor MOTION: A MOTION was made by Council Member Wolff and SECONDED by Council Member Rochman to go into Executive Session at 6:06 p.m. for the following purpose: EXECUTIVE SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM 1. Pursuant to ARS 38-431.03(A)(3) and (A)(4) discussion and/or consultation with the Town Attorney for Legal Advice and/or consultation with the Town Attorney regarding pending litigation relating to Wong Family, L.L.C. v. Town of Oro Valley, Pima County Cause No. 20005064 and Wong Family, L.L.C. v. Town of Oro Valley, Pima County Cause No. 20013660 2. Pursuant to ARS 38-431.03(A)(3) and (A)(4) discussion or consultation with the Town Attorney for Legal Advice and/or consultation with the Town Attorney regarding pending or contemplated litigation relating to Citizens for Open Government v. Town of Oro Valley,U.S, District Court Cause No. CIV 01-393 TUC-FRZ and related signage issues 3. Pursuant to ARS 38-431.03(A)(3) discussion and/or consultation with the Town Attorney for Legal Advice related to: a) The Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 12 rezoning by the Pima County Board of Supervisors (Co9-0 1-42 Stone Canyon, L.L.C. —Rancho Vistoso Blvd. rezoning); b) The Town of Oro Valley Proposition 401 referendum; c) Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 11 PAD; and d) related matters MOTION carried, 4-0. MOTION: A MOTION was made by Council Member Wolff and SECONDED by Council Member LaSala to go out of Executive Session at 7:05 p.m. Motion carried, 4-0. 04/03/02 Minutes, Council Regular Session 2 RESUME REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER 7:16 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Paul Loomis, Mayor Fran LaSala, Council Member Bart Rochman, Council Member Werner Wolff, Council Member EXCUSED: Dick Johnson, Vice Mayor PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Loomis led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS Town Manager Chuck Sweet reviewed the upcoming meetings. CALL TO AUDIENCE No speakers. MOTION: Council Member LaS ala MOVED to APPROVE the Consent Agenda. Council Member Rochman SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 4-0. 1. CONSENT AGENDA (Consideration and/or possible action) A. Minutes— 3-8-02; 3-20-02 B. Resolution No. (R)02-25 Acceptance of a portion of Vistoso Commerce Loop for maintenance as a public street C. Resolution No. (R) 02-26 Authorizing and Approving a Contract with Westland Resources, Inc. for professional engineering design for High Mesa "E" Zone Reservoir Expansion D. Resolution No. (R)02-27 Project No. OV 30-00/01 20 Approval of an Intergovernmental Agreement with Arizona Department of Transportation,Intermodal Transportation Division for Design Funds for Calle Concordia Safety Improvements; Oracle Road to Calle Loma Linda E. Resolution No.(R)02-28 Approval of Intergovernmental Agreement among the Town of Oro Valley, City of Tucson (Tucson-Pima Public Library) and Pima County Free Library District for the Operation and Maintenance of the Oro Valley Public Library F. Resolution No. (R)02-29 Award of Contract for Project No. OV30 99/00-07 to Falcone Brothers, Inc. for the installation of 2 Box Culverts on Pecan Place and the relocation of a 12-inch Water Main G. OV5-02-01 Public Art proposal for the Albertsons Store; Located on the northeast corner of First Avenue and Oracle Road, Parcel#2200902060 04/03/02 Minutes, Council Regular Session 3 H. Acceptance of the Oro ValleyWater Utility Commission 2002 Annual Report 2. DRAWING FOR THE FRIENDS OF THE ORO VALLEY PUBLIC LIBRARY'S RAFFLE Mayor Loomis announced the winners after four young volunteers chose the lucky tickets. The Friends of the Oro Valley Public Library gave awards to the following residents of Oro Valley: 1. Sarah and James Hobert were the winners of the top raffle prize— a trip for two to Scotland including a stay in a genuine Scottish castle. 2. William Ratsch won round-triptickets for two on America West to California and a weekend for two at the Ritz-Carlton Laguna Beach. 3. Rowland Rundle won a weekend for two at the Sheraton El Conquistador resort. 4. Paul Gohdes won a round of golf for four at Stone Canyon Country Club. Jane Kuennemeier, President of the Friends of the Oro Valley Public Library thanked for their support, dedication and hardwork. She also presented a check to the everyone pp � Town in the amount of$35,731.00, install to be used to purchase and a canopy over the patio room at the new library. In addition to the canopy, the funds will also be used to purchasechildren's area supplies and patio furniture. The Library is scheduled to open in July, 2002. Mayor or Loomis recessed the meeting at 7:37 p.m. The meeting resumed at 7:45 p.m. 3. PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICATION FOR A PERSON TRANSFER, SERIES 07 LIQUOR LICENSE FOR PEPPERMILL CAFÉ LOCATED AT 1171 E. RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD #159 Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk, explained that in accordance with Section 4-201 of the Arizonapp Revised Statutes, the application was posted for 20 days commencing February thepremises of the applicant's property and no protests were received 20, 2002 on p during that time. She reported that Chief Sharp had conducted a background investigation d g p applicant and found no derogatory information on the applicant, therefore, he had on the g no objections ections to the approval of the Person Transfer of the Series 07 Liquor License. Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. Edward V. Loughlin, Jr. 12935 North Eagleview Drive explained that he was the acting to the applicant and was in support of the request. Also, he complimented the consultantpp staff on professionalism rofessionalism and was impressed by the beauty and maintenance of the Town. Mayor Loomis closed the public hearing. 04/03/02 Minutes, Council Regular Session 4 MOTION. • A MOTION was made by Council Member La Sala to APPROVE the request for a Person Transfer, Series 07 Liquor License at the Peppermill Café located at 1711 East Rancho Vistoso Boulevard #159. Council Member Wolff SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 4-0. 4. PUBLIC HEARING—ORDINANCE NO. (0)02-10 AMENDING POLICY NO. 10, ATTENDANCE AND LEAVES, OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PERSONNEL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES CODE Jeff Grant, Human Resources Director, stated that the Town of Oro Valley adopted the Town of Oro ValleyPersonnel Policies and Procedures Code Ordinance (0)99-95 on April 21, 199p 9. He explained that the revisions to the subject policy are recommended in providecompetitive to a level of annual leave to some of the Town's employees, and to clarify several minor segments of the policy. Mayor Loomisopenedpublic the hearing. There being no speakers, Mayor Loomis closed the public hearing. MOTION: Council Member Rochman MOVED to APPROVE Ordinance No. (0)02- 10 endin the Town of Oro Valley Personnel Policies and Procedures Code, Policy amending No. 10—Attendance and Leaves. Council Member LaSala SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 4-0. 5. PUBLIC HEARING—ORDINANCE NO. (0)02-11 OV8-01-02, PWP LAMBERT LLC, REPRESENTING THE PROPERTY OWNER, REQUESTS APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AN UNDERBUILD PRIMARY RISER POLE TO SERVE THE OSCO DRUG SITE• LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LA CANADA AND LAMBERT LANE, PARCEL #222425025D Bryant Nodine, Planning and Zoning, explained that the applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit for an underbuild primary riser pole. He explained that the proposed osed utility pole would be located on the north side of the Osco Drug site on the south side of Lambert Lane, inline with the existing utility poles in the area. Charlie Boyd, representing Parkwest Development, concurred with the report and stated p g that the yproposed company to issue a check to the Town to compensate the difference in p cost to create the underbuild primary riser pole for future upgrades for the site. Mayoropenedpublic Loomis the hearing. There being no speakers, Mayor Loomis closed the public hearing. MOTION: Council Member LaSala MOVED to APPROVE Ordinance No. (0)02-11 for a Conditional Use Permit, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit "A" and the added condition that the applicant deposit a check with the Town for the cost of 04/03/02 Minutes, Council Regular Session 5 he line at a future date. Council Member Rochman SECONDED the undergrounding of t motion. EXHIBITS "A" OV8-01-02 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 1. The proposedpoledesigned must be desi ed to service the entire site (southwest corner of La Canada and Lambert Lane.) 2. The Conditional Use Permit is terminated at such time as the underground electrical utilities in the area adjacent to the site are completed. 3. To provideundergrounding for under oundin when Lambert Lane is improved the applicant will pay the difference between installing the riser pole and the undergrounding as provided in the estimate; a difference of$11, 856.00 Motion carried, 4-0. 6. DISCUSSION, CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING SETTLEMENT OF PENDING LITIGATION IN WONG FAMILY L.L.C. V. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY CAUSE NO. 20005064 AND WONG FAMILY,L.L.C. V. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY CAUSE NO. 20013660 Council Member Rochman MOVED to MOTION: ACCEPT the recommendation of. Town Attorneyand direct that a Settlement Agreement incorporating the terms of the the recommendation be entered into by the Town. Council Member Wolff SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 4-0. TOWN MANAGER'S REPORT No report. CALL TO AUDIENCE No speakers. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Council Member Wolff moved to adjourn at 8:05 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. Respectfully submitted, Q(. /t WMAILA Linda 'ersha, Secretary II 04/03/02 Minutes, Council Regular Session 6 I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the regular session of the Town of Oro Valley Council of Oro Valley, Arizona held on the_3rd_ day of April, 2002. I further certify that the meeting was duly called and held and that a quorum was present. Dated this day of , 2001. Kathryn E. Cuvelier, CMC Town Clerk B . TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: April 17, 2002 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & TOWN COUNCIL FROM: Bob Kovitz, Public Information Officer Kevin Verville, Information Systems Administrator SUBJ: Information Activities Report March, 2002 BACKGROUND: During2001-02, the Mayor and Council have been provided withreports that summarize both the public information and Town website activities for the past two months. This seventh report will continue to make comparisons among the p statistical data being gathered to track the traffic on the Town website. Other public information activities are also noted. Public Information Activities Similarly previous revious months, the majority of the print media articles have been follow-up stories regarding Council, Planning and Zoning Commission and other advisory body meetings. There were also a significant number of stories regarding the municipal election and issues surrounding the Neighborhood 12 annexation. Other stories included: 1. March 1-Sun City Tipster General Plan Focus Groups 2. March 1-Sun City Tipster Native plant education programs 3. March 6—KNST-AM radio Annexation hearing 4. March 6-Arizona DailyStar (Metro.)_Honeybee Canyon, Neighborhood 12 5. March 10 Arizona Daily Star (Metro.)—Bike rodeo 6. March 13 NW Explorer Bike rodeo, helmet donation 7. March 13 NW Explorer Tangerine Road project meeting March 25—KOLD-TV (noon, 5 p.m., 6 p.m., 10 p.m.) Tortolita decision; 8 OV begins to provide services 9. March 29 Arizona Daily Star (NW Section)—Clean Air Fiesta Website Activities Since the launch of the new site design in July 2001, the number of visits to our sitehas increased dramatically. In fact, March 2002 saw the most activity in web historyof the Town's web site. The chart below shows the web site sessions the for the last 9 months: Total Sessions 1 ,— 1 1 A 1 1 P.M .41!". 1k7.4 ,�s: • �� ` 4. qLS £ i%1 .'f:44:4;„ '47, f g V5- 41 .• 4SYiy:fid, �` }yv'.•. ,Ln, ,5 5 7,1 �'okZ.'L s r9 /r.,•...,...r.� //... ,,i/;:;'!,az>n ,.•.,.. ....(a_v�., ,.,>y//,c.6;.as,,. ..,.a.�,w.,• .. 12 Mo. Jul-01 Aug- Sep-01 Oct-01 Nov- Dec-01 Jan-02 Feb-02 Mar-02 Avg 01 01 Below are the statistics for March 2002. The Maps, Public Works, and Transit Services pages were among the most popular in March. Human Resources and p g "book- marked" Clerk's pages remain among the highest entry point sites (usually book- pg marked" or saved in the visitor's "favorites" list). Statistics for March 2002 Total Sessions: 17624 Total Blind Sessions: 5427 Average Daily Sessions: 568 Top Five Most Commonly Accessed Pages Home 9440 page views Human Resources 2280 page views Maps 710 page views Public Works 441 page views Transit Services 438 page views Top Four Entry Point Pages (first pages viewed) Home 4455 page views Human Resources 662 page views Library 201 page views Clerk 132 page views Terminolociv Session: A visit to the web site where at least one link was selected (meaning the visitor viewed more than one page). Blind Session: These are visits to the site by viewers who have "book-marked" or saved the site name as one of their "favorite places." This means that search engines did not refer the viewers for their visits. Page Views: Number of requested pages from the web server during an individual session. Entry Point Page: First page viewed when arriving at the site. Note: Town of Oro Valley employees account for approximately 1% of the total sessions for the period. These employees usually access the site to update their pages, check on information, links or projects that they have been working on. c----- O. Ki:..A. Bob Kovitz, Public Infor tion Officer .,,,ZA-e,,....-:- 7_,,,, , „,,L._ Kev" erville, Info' ation Systems Administrator I Chuck Sweet, Town Manager C x w N. d 0 m n 3 . N 7.: 225s. N 70 -�x (OBD �O N W n < AD o 0 0 (� CD m 9 AD - D < v=, 3 s B g. S n N C"i --q cn F 0 a o) --.12 ,7 - . 0 - -(D i r E.o a m m 3 -x-8 5:(1.2 S m m m > > 5. aa-i Rr't d — oN � � — N z Cl) _ Q. O O O O O O O O O O O O O O CC pOpOOO WpWWWWWWWWW- NWNN0)NWN -p W WW ((�� N O O Q V) CO -.1 OO 11 A -A O t�CO W CD CO A A CO N"m V) M 23 .a .., --► .-a N -a N CO WCJt co --4 U) �- C M Eft cA of ► °' m b. E N 14 n §y7D3Zi W It of tv 0 z 3 tg w w COIV Z z -4Z N EA "� 40 NQp 0)OCD 0 1! t V La 0 O O N Z O CD Cn CON10• N Ln w WCD COO v Co m N O U ' ' I I 1 I J -V m -U „,,N O W 0 N 000) 00000000000 o OO CJS 0)0 0 Cn W 3 co .�,—m n C r 73 < v MEt U to Ef �'T o -1 Zz V Ato*A Ef - m —1 G) E - / ttEf - 0 w w 0 S yN �, �O0000000000000o0 Z (/ W �N o011 Nm m > Om RI D �� a400Q ch 73 m , 000000-,00000 . 0, , n zi 3 o r - . , D Z En73 rn O= 40 40 40 ”'to 411 1'4 N O -U N W 03 W N 0)0 W 6H Eft Eft Eft EA dt Eft EA Eft 6A Eft W 6A W )i 6A m m rn 0. CO"0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , OO Or.CO~n O N z "� Cn-.D. 1.0 E OD W N W C>D o.,m 0) 0) xi ) , ` 1 , ' 4 , r • t I ' I -r) n RI c -A -A-A -. pA W_ 0 72 IV C>D CO NO W -' CJS O .t. 00- 00000� r ,A co Cn 4. 0 cO C 1 -<C 40 41, 40��nm N NO NN M 6AM� 4,0 W - N ....,— �� W N W N N WEA-'Eft Eft Eft Eft Eft Eft 6A ' - �!-1 O N m w X10 (9 -4 co ' o0t0�00O0o000 to co----OD-A-ANoC T pps� �1 83 0 CD co m N -U o o 11 m V) 00 a, ., 'v O N) to coOO (D N(A 0 N v I"' i . . ► t 4 , 4 I 1 4 , 4 . , 'on M 2 d, �o.p .pom .� 0O S `gooD"""OOwoU+3 c �' $o 1!N -• 0 0 0 O 0 cn -1 -< < 40 EA 6ft 73 R. m • .A Eft bft (Ain s 'Q Oo co �'��► ` bl9N w 413 tft co NJ-Att�v�EftcCnm N D An W O Eft co y " ,, R Eft,,N N 0 Eft 0 0 jV 0 0 w �a�I U.�W co W . Wp 4, 6 J, 0co a w tO A � COn0w 0.) -COC CD0 ce O NN W AON co ..b.u, D 3 00rn r z - -1 . _ D „ , „ ,, , , ,,, ,,, ii . , , nir ..,,0 . , , „if w _ i i - g- E '1 ' '... 1 '' 11:, . I I , , ' ” ':.. 1 , Fli u t , 1 '., ' - .li ';-.- :. ' ,asi j i ' , - LI '..1.1 , -- . ' - , .".• ' '- i '- - '----1 March 2002 ,,,,,, AA r,r,'' ......,:. '1 .----------- .......00. \-7,7::::,,...., ",,,.72.:.. ,skiirto.:t.,,,ii. _.... g7i; COYOTE I <J N ,— General Overview of Coyote Run Operations for the month of March 2002. Clients Total Scheduled Trips Total TripsTotalRegistered , 591 1,219 1,123 21 Days of Service Total Service Miles for the Month = 15,675 i � .Start Service. End ServiTotal Service Vehicle Veh�cle ,, YeartMa_,_:,,,,4,„,.,,,,,Num....;. 44,;:1;:„,„.,_ ,.. Miles Miles Miles 152 615 154,711 2,096' 1996 Ford 92 _ _ 1996 Ford 96 163,707 165,762 2,055 64 119,797 122,730 2,933 1998 Ford _ 1999 Dodge 49 73,565 76,427 2,862 2000 Dodge 13 67,219 70,431 3,212 9 2001 Ford 69 16,327_ 18,998_ 2,671 Average Daily Total Trips = 53.48 Cancellations = 96 , Denials Due to Demand = 0 O Wl N CV g CC)�(�iQO0) e-N N0) �p p ��t C7A Cp CA to i(�totpr$O gal-r�NN O r st'�O Cp�r 0 � r t N ;1- r ^ m � OIm � to EA fA 4f,69 >28;228>-'0,>-:F:,>44>-,,, i cevit::/: O O -111 I i �-0 ..0 C)N t-1 ti CD O) o c..931..-;'''O 1 to CA�f C,C� `i -tilj re., 'Cr_r41 N� t` f w v_i e O Ht �j (�pLLQ-tip-lL.-Il 1LN1LNr t+NCV i ;3,..! ;,.4*.i.7; !0: ! !s.,_4 1 ' $O2 a, 1- = N ototr.) 1 � ,...! NWtomr :alN r � z : c,-,(4-,-.--- +l ;Ilk as ;§ 10 $ s g 1,,,,I, o - g aAg rt x "- LL_ arLLrLL.,_ iLN ,N -.. ! J D ■ D D ■ ■ , , --':''', f\i' :-' ti -0to0t-C rCD1�OO ' i _ 4 Ntot3 i Ili p r ,,y' ii t 1-- i _ Q to;to a ' Q �- i j ~ 3 ONt��p 0 „i i I'd E $ ,,, ,, . M � N ` !` tDrN ! `tt3NM O ............- „... El ,, m .,,r-of __ t r { Li N:::: :!qt rad ,..f,--ii! 1J { r W �� WN , kl --_, - q).4 G tjVNWNf,+ .6- -,- ,u_ . , 46400, .0 ,,,,,,, i h A ,. ; al :,. , , 4 �„0pO E Rs oWd�oo$s _..1:k 1 , 0 R * ,-mic . 1 r Ctft M-ONcND j liall il- ,2, till m 0.0.0. 1 - . �'O.- MO� ,,,,z\ t 4is/ to O C r{r3� COlfi (e-;; rNN 1 3 1 kiln g . ,\-,.....''., ,‘ , 1 2 . - o i. p > olk6 O .M " I • ;\ a 11s OOr-ONo NOMV.LON 0 1 GI L' U r \ s Ta I 11 o I hi, 7 8.....,;;wa as U. �ri -, O-§'tflMO~- r., SS M�O'r'N �= 6 v-co Co O +S a r v---N ` fair fA d!t!1 M to �` co ; �p ♦ I CD ...„......_ o'M v'o�p o fC"rdsN t�f�� 071 r . ER ENH v, V li Is.�t• cNV 5 p OO � m A(9, ` 1 OOV'CQ88 if,o* Q O cO Mpp�,,A••M'�f' ti Q' �y M �n .7.,-;;;;;;;ca .7---2.9,--: 7 r , _ - , . III), O In O iri, 1 I , . . -E-F -.1-. 1 -t. '., 1 II. sp EVI8 1 N r ! !!',9i! t g 1 m G x x xo ox i 3 x m ccrem L �. > > > > > i■ 6 a o 1111 11111 .5 'Iro-q v -EL.-EL-2-4 1 . kg , 03 n 0 =g ` ►. 8 tp-Np 1� to r' 7 i rn rn'rn 8`b' a m Q> m m so I �j �i O p O Oi . (11,§§1§§ Iimg r N N X Dgs, §§§CCB r' $ o 0 s o 0 0 0 o m -t8EtE8 8E88 m eI N 1 M N tl� W W t/1 to ql Yl M h! U. LL u Li_U.Li.. ^fes ............._“. n>,..u.4. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 170UNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: April 17, 2002 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Jeffrey H. Weir, CEcD Economic Development Administrator SUBJECT: Economic Development Activity Report for March 2002. SUMMARY: Attached is the March 2002 Economic Development Project Activity/Status Report. This report is compiled at the end of each calendar month. Major projects are included which includes a Location, Status and Pertinent project data. The report contains three sections: Active Projects, Recently Completed Projects (normally displayed for 12 months) and Community Projects. All projects that have some form of Status change are identified in bold type. On a recurring basis this report will be included in the Council Packet as a Consent Item with a report submitted at the end of each calendar quarter. Please contact me directly for any questions or additional information I may provide prior to the scheduled Council meeting if your schedule allows. Also, please request additional specific project data -nd I will provide same as soon as possible. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Town of Oro Valley Economic Development Department Project Activity/Status Report—March 2002. i "------1 - i t, , i i _( L...„.... .„ ,,,,,k1 \......__i g, / 41 ' Jeffrey H. Weir, CEcD Economic Development Administrator .�1 ,,,a,,,,,,,„_., Chuck Sweet Town Manager r s • IA 1 c 01 .- 0 \az 4-- e ics. e e..4. e 45 LL " O co C) CoO 0 CD O O �p U) - Vaf in c�A in i o CD d' o 0 co00 -L.; 0 CD 0 o Z MOR3 CD O 4. 0�0 N co 0 O CT In 0 r' 1 d" N m N Ln 'icr Co rl isO N 43 0 ow -o 0 N -6 cu .- c as !a N o irs fa O a o(Ni _ N c 41. = C o n17) : ! >.C Chi. O O w CT 13 ', C 0 C_ = - > C 0 4' U) - C O = _ O 735 :Z1' O ltto 2n3O2 oR3 � C 0 5 '0 73 4'' •- w u. Vf V .0 U O ^ a_ 0. J c1 2 0 w 4'' a) E _ o �-- as C .�..1 E O - o f a a) a) E fl.._ 1 to Eo - _ •> '� a1 a a) O B , u 3 c a) U a) .o a as CO r, E > a) c _ _ a) O O O '- Z V di7 O O t •� to -o = i �"� in g:uo O w �O V r� C S s o a) E m 52 au O o �, — cn cn c .0 p o 47 c o O = gob- H o 0 u) "o v E a.. *k O '_ = :6 In -.1 = if) -0 4„„. , io-- .0 -t IX3 .1-0 NI E c. 8 cn cn c E .,,,,,.,, C ,- N .E tin' ,C co W a 0 Uu_i .0 a O-, E = a) c -_O a) Q N 3 = 'a ") 0 s- c p O O U •> E i E 0 V > 0 •- ni p V O O -5 o a) ca o 0 0 o w �. Z 0. C9 0 I- V oo N a O C J u- u W I- a) N > E a) as -0 O o ca E 0 C ca ca V V O i O = Q U - — oC ao c V a) U -pin 0 0 O U L a) > m a) in U U _ ea •c c - C o N 3 W -�- p O i -L.. 0 c ra aa), ae -� u9 Y a) a) a. J no (0 0 c a) v) o� u.. cn L p U O �+.- •- p1 ca .— U .0V � v � orao� o � oa) oaS � -' i„ °_ � a) o `a _ i- J -Fa a) 11) a -"-' _' 04 U a) ra dS — O cu > a) z J - a) = "- to >. CU -r_- o 1-5- j (7, o i- 1.5 ro 6- (0 a) .2 tn. 0 i ,_ 4_,U) .0 ° na) -C a) -C Fo 12I u a) E a) -c v) (0 -c -5 -c oll-1 JD u = ti, E it; in 45“.) E IA u -t ce c o 0 (0 1 C o i ra O ra ca W (0 ra o a) o ra O O � � � JZQDCZWinI-- (n J L]C �--� � y-. DC � tnV) Ja_ OZ •- � � oC U I- oC a.+ C w E ( a2 113 o. 0. E e" u) Ow 4' . V � w '- C _ V :I.' _ CD ou 'la IA itCI OZ L. O a)i 4.0 _ E O '�E go •4; 2 _ Or U -c'' —2.3 5 mi m o co a) al V 00'C .-- O .. V O win0 E o6 a) to49 ni> ttn c as w _j L. u w — 06 "0 U a) L-- ai. "E) c (u cn — ,_ SE _ WE � Fo as a3 �� 0 � •.,Tu Z. 0 = O s > Oc L?_ 2 � U -L O HO43 ra -- -o linO Va . o = = EtUE -� Uapea) (5 �o a � f - O its OaOa) ' z o . o a U 0 O sO vMEVz ZOooU = as , > 3 0 'o = * O V a- O _* _ _ _ - _ - - 1 J _. . o 1-i N O 0 4_ I- i 5i IR a IA") R CD U)in O O O O N CDCD w - .0 V O i O O - CD O LI a. a. M a} !C O 00 O Ln O d= �O p p M tl. C7O M N t--+ M iTO O,-, V1 � � 13 lnO 00 � ,--4 tri I a) ID E a) c > E to o a) BN .� E a) o O P o O ., N V 'Q E ` N C > - E 0 CD� a) OV2 � = 0 U � 1 o n3 ,O 0 U) •- .� o o a) 4J C .- ~ N ra ea o a) >o � � E � � O .c Q iA v--I CD Z III a) i E L CD 0 0 o E -� Q O O c N o O In O U a) E = a) 0 X a) N N_ N C C O V'n -1 .moi-0 ,--. to = O< ..--. O:8 Q V n f .0 = to 0 73 = c C C C L. V C U0. a. Q Q � = w O 0 0 0 0 0 w .� Z V e r0 > in a) u, a) v.) Q Q'i a. '%. O iii as o C•_ C C = V CO "0 V '0 C O - ) -0 a) a) co O .0 O c a) c C = a ro M (070 0 •▪d O Q c 0 Q O 0 ( .(0 ( J •� t0 ui ✓ O pU U J U o Oo V EUa) EU Ta 3joIn � J � JCJ �> �- -� a) ck � > >�Z > O � j O � 2 O -o Oo 4— o > 0 a) V a) a) 2 4-' C • ' U E b o C � = 3 z 3 Z '� a) o ru a) o o rO ra N 2@i0ZZ (n _, a. oa. oC (n cr 0 't •- •ii .- PO o W aO O. I.. CI cn Z - O W in '_ _ c a) .. C ,.N, -0 c u t e-4 ,.. .?...1 a) m E E 0 < O ''" la '� °2 t E ,0 z b. c . 6. �+ = V in - U t c O. ,� o •a) O '6_ 01 O U di L a) df = I— =__ Kil ,aj 0 Q ate-+ O V E) (I) >. BoT ±-'._ = ICII.L >`� W 1.. (n m fil V E O 13' V L.. in C : 0 tn, - a C C c d O 3 O a) in � a) V - L n �' X V U C p� > Oi- . c of cu ," U vi .8 > a,0 (43 a) ro eL r Li a) 2 U c SD›... 4., ,_ O ra Co s- E co - in.Ec 2 v 0 O� �- 4, C C C C m v m u 4_, mi u u E3 5 -0 ...... si-a) 0 X' _ 4) > . cCUUoa. 0 Ct fn (.9it. *, ✓ U) O H * * 5 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: April 17, 2002 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL FROM: Robert Jacklitch, Project Manager SUBJECT: Project No. OV-20-03-01 Oro Valley Water Utility Big Wash Water Plant D-And E-Zone Booster Station Upgrades SUMMARY: Per the direction of Mayor and Council through the 2001-2002 Capital Improvement Budget of the Oro Valley Water Utility and, plans and specifications were provided for the acceptance of public bids for the following project: Project No. OV-20-03-01 Oro Valley Water Utility Big Wash Water Plant D-And E-Zone Booster Station Upgrades ThisJro ect consists of replacing our existing E-zone booster station which will provide a capacity of 3,000 p gallons per minute as indicated in the Master Plan. In addition we will install a new D-zone booster pump station which will transfer water to Water Plant No. 4 and to the existing Allied Signal reservoir. Also included is a new motor control building, a storage structure for maintenance equipment, landscape improvements and a masonry wall. Bid alternative "A" is recommended since it provides a decorative site wall that has been designed to blend with the proposed development in the area. Big Wash is located South of Tangerine in the vicinity of Oracle Road. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A Bid Opening Tabulation Attachment B Location Map FISCAL IMPACT: The total amount bid by the lowest bidder is $684,600.00 by West Point Contractors, Inc. The engineers estimate is $727,750.00 and the OVWU budget is $706,250.00. Funds are available in the current year budget. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY imoCOUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 2 RECOMMENDATIONS: A. We recommend the award of Contract No. OV-20-03-01 to West Point Contractors, Inc, the lowest bidder in the amount of$684,600.00. B. Direct the Water Utility Director to prepare a Notice of Award to West Point Contractors, Inc. and p transmit said Notice alongwith the Contract Agreement and Bond forms for execution. C. Direct the Water Utility Director to issue the Notice to Proceed in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Agreement upon the receipt of the Contract Agreement. D. Authorize the Water UtilityDirector to execute Contract Change Orders and/or Supplemental Agreements incidental to the prosecution of Work. E. Direct the Town Clerk to hold the bid bonds from all bidders until such time that a Contract Agreement has been executed. SUGGESTED MOTION: movepp to approve the award of Contract No. OV-20-03-01 to West Point Contractors Inc., Or I move to deny / 11 / Project Man.l.er W.ter Utility Dir ctor A Town Ma ager LLEYA O v �ti •Y r ;4* triu r O r » f1 -47 :%''''''',„ .r{z7•t 4.5.• crii:r?< " �':M1 t • 4 °r mow. te -▪ � 4 p ,i,...."-0-,,,,,- ql . r fipsr� :7-< -h y.-,'1 ,0:..„-,,,—.4::„."4 r r j ;p JM7!{ pN/ --'-'---,..,,,,,,.-e .,,,,-...;:',::-.:-."'. y gip, !,;MyY "..iA� NDED ATTACHMENT A C/) ''' \ CD 0 W O Op O O O 0 O 0 0 0 O 4 g 't O d O ODO O .--+ `p O O O M 00 00 00 Lc, N O O ,..,, ,- ,—� r--+ 00 M e. 000 ° 00 N �t 00 QT `O `O M Ai N 00 00 4 I i I I I I I E'er W . r W � cA E-{0-1 c O N I • N O O ;-+O g N ,n cz v Cl) O N cAW c) W o •� a U 0 Z WE-- � ZN 4 '� � �' Ei4tC6o U z - � � W U U w � A 0 E W W O O �f 4!t c t P4 a) , >-4 >-4 >-4 ›-' • g 4 i.,=, ,,: .ic ..,: Ao 0 Ei* p,., c,9 4t • z +' C 4tt a (1) A* ti) t�4 Q t� tin 0 c-1 '� C ,-� [ N En O c�ct •- ---4 ct N C:4 lel 4-1 0p000 U 00 E-+ - 00 g ocq � U N RI E En ' N C O O a). N a�, � < g )I—? ''''''s • N 0 •rt-4 Z -', ( v) U �- p W 4� O O,d O ,::14 o ...,_, c.) ,sz, ,0 c) ci) v 0; wcid '5'd E c) t--- o .7i- 9 O ,-,1 E-- oo L) E--H p..� H N M cd U 8N N +:t ;4 c, ctE 8 .4---... , ,- w 0 ,,, -6') a) 023 E 0 5 48 .,5. 2 "E :..,,— cz JE 6 cz,. d o cA tl) Z va (...) '' C.) 4- )--i cip - NI 4 0 o •• •... >, _,._ Lii ,-, ct ,...., , ,,, O E-1 c — -4 ' `) 5 4,-2,'-' cn ..' _9•.) '''' * N t E- 4 0 a .,_. . -, . • . 0 -,-,,) 0 8 u 0 ts,... U N Cn 8 0 0 0 N t tii.., c24 U H � � w > U H4w a U a H MAR-21-2002 THU 09:47 AM WESTLAND RESOURCES INC, FAX NO, 520 206 9518 P, 04 :0 1 Oo oq 4 O mo- • p 0 C a CD O 0 OO CD ..C.\.,1 OOO 0 CDO 0 O C N Na . . N p -p N- N CO NCO CO r•-• U3 N- N- N- N- (I) (i, U) E :,:-..--.•:•::-:. 43 E LL .. _ - O .::...�. O O O 0 O O O O O Q) :.,',..Y.-::.---..; O O C CD Q O 0 9 :,: CD O 0 0 O 0 0 O p a :' . . N- N CO N Egi .,Q- U) • • 0 -_.._._... O O 0 0 0 Q 0 p 0 O O o 0 in CD 0 0 :; . CO _ ui t.. -•-.....0. N u O in CO N- in co N N 0 - •E-�• . 't N- 10 un u) c) 69 U> U r 69 u3 ... 43 EA3 ..,.� , 4 0 0 o Q O 0 Co 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 `n 0, o 0 C :''� G o in o o ch co 04 LO bel Cn .... to ; 7; . Eft (~f} �A) tf? . .L.'LL-. a),:-..,....L r--- 4- kr; , _ o _ 7 ' 1.7:'...,.....,.., , I T-- _ 1 •cf w..,vCi. n CIS 5, � Ci CA �,} � P-1►�", — ;-t-:-::,;-'.1- fs 17.--"r-fc A rd ,� civ 'u hi 6- . g , +P�. r vome cccts • to p -a :;::.:::::::::::•.: O C N E cn 0. E v RS `° o v a o o c,, A a o o u ':,:' •;,:'. .,c u; = O C •E -a ' s= ami " `.) ca • p, ,3 u `. I u :- N C: R �� C ,v .. .o v� cry wr�� rA Q,.0 r G 0cL. `8 'Q t b �? 'Lr r U ' CI ••.- ...g , Z r C .., v CI C p O N ii .1 \ , a c Q E n1 c� u Q 8 , c1 , .b a- v p on C a. b O, sr! p., •• -,.,•,, - R..Q. V C n C u -� to G Q g �' cc .- pin pil -n p. a �. a' o B .� •°' ° u1:4 u c� ga, ,,, a. 0 .S C d .c) 5 , H i- .._._:.:._... , ,.&) .. .5 u,.E ,, . V) 7:, -— E n . .a. '' . -,z, z; ::,::•::•:.:..,::.‘ ,0 k> 1! U 7:3 Cli 7--/ Q 97: uat g '-'. a. 0 -75,/ ^ ° a — g = . uC. C. -a C. a� C0 .a u .. t, .0 v 2 = c7` U ..0 Cl5 o v .� a. v -v, a, P a, - .,,, c,1 aLL1 —.... --v-.' ,; !"-i . C6— . In "g m c,. 1 - �' • 'U Q. I-' Qa a Q3 ,,-... Q �} p D � � --'-'--:�•"�:•::.L.- i....:::::...:.:.:..., � Ev, � � C o� � C 0. a g � � � � � � � CI., g J Lz. c� U Lam► co u U 0 ..: �-, N c*1 �t 'p r o0 C', '-' MAR-21-2002 THU 09:48 AM WESTLAND RESOURCES INC. FAX Na 520 206 9518 P. 05 __ o © 0 0 0 0 000 0o CD 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0, 01 CO 0 c) o 0 0 o D o o. o 0 0.d 0 co 0 0 0 CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 o p(.0 0 N C? Ql 0 0 0 CO cr1 iI) in N N a _ O N- Q) (p N. ,T 66 (f) (M U ( Uf t (!3 cc, ' *H to '9 _ - ►- -+ _ , - - - O 0 O OT 00 0, 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 (0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 M VT CO Cl) 1- G b9 (•A (A (A 0 0 0 0 CD a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD C) 0 0 O C) o O O 0 CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o lf)O C) 0 0 Co0 0 Co0 0 ►r1 to o r- o 4 o ►n r• C? � w u)w 0 w co w �� w w (% - V> N t' t1 °' C) U) ` in 1 (F) ( t) tl) U) C i"'. CD 0 0 0� 0 o 0 0 0 0 0\ 0 0 O O 0 O © O 0 O ci 0 0 0 6 00 M 0 0 0 t0 0 O D ti t1) Q V) N O i- C 0 0 (!) Ef? R t4 E4 (A (I) Cla CA C4 CA n , ,,, ,,, ,, . V) vt GO aq b co 0 o W an� ' a al U , oo a. to >i '3 a> .FG Ill r 4 2 ei. g -ti m R. u oj� o ❑7:7 15 •� .i 'Qms 4) D. G cesa g e N g cv C p o ' w oCr� O 4-•" 12 ut, �., to ,4 cn 4) - ► O CQ ,4 t C 4j 71 cl1 _ ,Q •a f, cn .,d = 4a q �.. C ca �, O O GL O• cd y s .rO U M t'1 °Q U r 1 , o� .4 a . > aJ I, cz• -:,;.! V c E El 4 .N t. ti . ./), ' R. E o,a O d., U z e UO E O n �r i., �' N i.+ , C' a� yy 'v d O-...} N ... C� � � � � QJ ¢` � G11) o rei, cd i � �7 � � rJ 0 4 ,4 .9... 7; n F to q — ,., ..... 7_-_... u = U • .Ct = -C) 0 Ci3 = 15 tv O ra ___i0 n O � • ✓ L 3 ' C • _ vN Cc � . m = .L V O -r1 y -b -Q 'oU CQ 'A O ❑ . P1 .....,, g ' < q � a j ,, ti r 5 u. o an.� .� r u •^ .9 �-- s..4. a..) aaa p -E ; 2 — ,' ° cl •8 a> a, C T, o o E A . , E g ,9 ti-- p :° g >, Q a . '~-C c 0. ,. Ua.„ c Ct. u IL. Lx U. GA !1a LI.. to e9_ C'ra 1 J. v r• O0 CA f.. N rn TT p le Icv eq LEY is> • 44-4. ••,,,,4•447.,„,„ , - , •'• . •,•• --,•—•44??,- . ' d(*'• • 4t. —uNDED ATTACHMENT B 4 itri'^;;�-- Y-'ti' ..ri?ii-!.S•'.:'. ._;�?r ,t'-tr•;i. _..�s.: t. ... �t.+.,T' �"����..;1,'�.C``CO="�'=S'Yt`.,'-•.., dj;Vi;�ni s�r,�y. .. _ 3132 WW1 32 31 _ THiS .. PROJECT _ ID 22 : a 111111' 11\41111 _. ROAD i koO NGEgZ `�:6 i A 31 ACCESS RD. x i2 31 5 Ho W lip,••r E 6 • , "r S S 1 V I/lifi Ir. as. 3"= 1 MILE on..r0-4-i 0 mum 07 illimus,?.inimm______Itsillimousia 0 ion r: AV�%'Wu���r� tit 1111: :i��, swum moos"' s X111. �iso s ��►_041,�♦ 0,�� ��ri W X1111 G o_ .:l ••i•• ...,I. Z �. In 1111 ..J 1aIsl*s 1� I�� �A�• L�0 11111, lIUR II. •. I>44 • Q mu! an un 1% �• • J MI MI —___ ,INA! Ak 4.2.. L..... 6 pi milk A .ffinePo ---____ .. _.., II Mt PlivtaV , f pew 4040. - - ....i4101 -dr Olft11F164PW :Xi 1 _ /*N alillki }g' 5 5 ANG ..: -1LOCATION AC . ..1 A PORTION OF SW1/4 CORER OF SECTION 32, T-11—S, R-14--E, G.& S.R.M.PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA SCALE: 1" = 3 MILES 4..E.1 -.....____ Q.._. {.... ...........__ �•. LEGEND EXISTING PROPERTY LINE WV EXISTING WATERMAIN AND VALVE NE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: April 17, 2002 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Robert Jacklitch, Project Manager SUBJECT: Project No. OV-20-01-02 Oro Valley Water Utility Rehabilitation/Re-Equipping of Oro Valley Well C-4 SUMMARY: Mayor and Council through the 2001-2002 Capital Improvement Budget of the Oro Valley Per the direction of y g Water Utility and, plans and specifications were provided for the acceptance of public bids for the following project: Project No. OV-20-01-02 Oro Valley Water Utility Rehabilitation/Re-Equipping of Oro Valley Well C-4 re-equip the existingwell C-4, located on Pusch Wilderness Dr. The existing well pump is fhis project i s to q p over-sized at 800gallonsper minute and has had historic problems maintaining flow and produces milky water. um sized at 275gallons per minute will enable us to continuously feed water into "C" and A new submersible pump "D" zones, providingan increase in reliable water service in both zones. This project will also include pressure . the existingtelemetrysystem, reworking of site piping and adding one pressure reducing valve an upgrade to y (pry). ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A Bid Opening Tabulation Attachment B Well C-4 Site Plan FISCAL IMPACT: The total amount bid by the lowest bidder is $87,000.00 by Gilbert Pump and p Eq ui ment Company. Engineers estimate is $75,000.00. Funds are available in the current year budget. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 2 RECOMMENDATIONS: A. We recommend the award of Contract No. OV-20-01-02 to Gilbert Pump and Equipment Company, the lowest bidder in the amount of$87,000.00. B. Direct the Water Utility Director to prepare a Notice of Award to Gilbert Pump and Equipment Company and transmit said Notice along with the Contract Agreement and Bond forms for execution. p y C. Direct Direct the Water UtilityDirector to issue the Notice to Proceed in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Agreement upon the receipt of the Contract Agreement. D. Authorize the Water Utility Director to execute Contract Change Orders and/or Supplemental Agreements incidental to the prosecution of Work. E. Direct the Town Clerk to hold the bid bonds from all bidders until such time that a Contract Agreement has been executed. SUGGESTED MOTION: move to approve the award of Contract No. OV-20-01-02 to Gilbert Pump and Equipment Company, Or I move to deny /24/di' • ? /./ Project Man. =r 72- . r ility Di tor _dd.( Town Ma ager LEY Ai , +.`Fri' rryt4 P.}P aye 2• . 0 ..,AtA.,,y,',,,.-5,','i-;:,,,,,,.--,-isr-1 • ',':•'5W4,—,,,Ea,•-- '/tyR'T2 say '`*? `-. r e fir++ .�,i.- + Nt 1( `=� ='"_task>`A1 3. UNDER ATTACHMENT A • UI W O It ' E"4 O ,L4 e CD W O CI) VI cn Cn N -ti 4) a W4 E-4 E-� d 4 ' p . pa : ►Z A i U cam) ;24 -1''' .,:l Z a) OW ° i a g O O a E-1 /65 "d 'r8 , •4 a) t,-,i 44 ..c: ,.-1 N •,-.4 N 4.-4 t ^ '1- 'C//) a) E .TJN-- '',.„ , • -6 ,5., ,c 0 . c, . 7t- . P. --,.. 4 ,1- 0 ,,) , ,-) �-. -- e. 00 ~ T4 'L-4) N H cn It H -6 N Q� , ct cn 0 g ; .—4E 5 0 5 ,- — E bp ^ O .. •- O E* a 7-4 ` t W 0 a cn. I), 0 ,..„ o E i-4 W 0 ...c '5 ::), A,-,i -, (L) c...) ,.. :— 0-..3 a) , Pi* H CS p, p4 s, ,--) b,A,LEY Ap, 1- , ; • -41 - • >tr- o veA.Vrel-'it, °L/NDED : -17---f ATTACHMENT B y,4'{ 4' 4" wf•.i}+.eL1. sT':-._ ..;-• -r,3-t F - `� �.. '='P'.`-;,.: t-.:,:,:‘;---2',.p'...=.; 3 Q N u O 1{ .-�.-I- N q) I _ limn ounil lam Z • • z ( MSm o om w r. I z I l _ I CC a" .± I w - ¢. I N > I=44.4"11 W �' '�' _ / X kir h•J m < ,--,-- Z U = F44 V) --� .. W z U I (f) F- W W F- CC W O OI W X cn w 1::, W z W T X ›- ( illo 5L.LJ U.I ..... 0, —J _! W ....1 --ii Q tre4 L U , E >Q I--- F- U U LuJ I zQ LJ 1 0 .....J = CC _1w Q Z C D 0_ I O O 0 O f: O > L Z I CD I ~Q I-- x w W U_ W O~ a_ U I--� Q D Ca)= CL I W W 1 p W U ^_1 Z J W N L.1_1 0 --J Q Q Q Co p � zCD o �� � 1-Li } � Z CO Uc:3 Z>-- L ~ - I) F__) W Q mEj m W � -1 W mowL w w = x ' o W `s' o v) W Zpc I (0 0 COm ( zcwr) 1I izi2 --) dzA `��l-A-II II y II If �, I Ii! NLO • 1 C15 Q . • • W = w 1-'1 L f, w cr) < U-I 0 = L.L1 ,t- (2 C/D _ n s . x z cp -� W o- U --i . E n s 10 C:12 �n > a_ c� ISD > Co N� r. r� 4-.410(-0--,,, ,--:Z 3 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: April 17,2002 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL FROM: Don Manspeaker, Sr.Civil Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Resolution#(R)02-30 Authorizing and Approving a Line Extension Agreement Between the Town of Oro Valley and Monterey Homes Providing for Water Service by the Town of Oro Valley to the Mira Vista subdivision Lots 1-60. SUMMARY: The Town Water Code, established by Ordinance #96-13, requires that applicants for water service enter into a Line Extension Agreement (LEA) with the Town. The LEA establishes the framework for the relationship between the applicant and the Town, spelling out such things as what facilities the applicant will construct, the cost of those improvements, what costs (if any) will be eligible for reimbursement, the method and limitations of reimbursement, the calculation and payment of fees and the dedication/acceptance of the facilities. FISCAL IMPACT: Under this agreement the facilities constructed will become assets of the Town. The agreement also allows the Utility to reimburse Monterey Homes $11,605 dollars for the cost of materials to oversize 760 linear feet of water main from eight inch to twelve inch pipe per section 15-13-2 of Town Code. Funds are available for the reimbursement in the Enterprise Fund under Capital Outlay-Mains. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No.(R)02-30 Authorizing and Approving a Line Extension Agreement between the Town of Oro Valley and Monterey homes Providing for Water Service by the Town of Oro Valley to the Mira Vista subdivision Lots 1-60. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval and execution of the LEA. SUGGESTED MOTION: The Town Council may wish to consider one of the following motions: I move to approve Resolution(R)02- 30 or I move to not approve Resolution (R)02-30 / e7trd Ir. Civil Engine ring Technician Water Utility Director i Town Man.:er RESOLUTION NO. (R) 02-30 RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING A LINE EXTENSION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY AND MONTEREY HOMES CONSTRUCTION, LLC TO DESIGN AND INSTALL WATER FACILITIES AT MIRA VISTA LOTS 1-60 IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORO VALLEY PLAN NO. OV 12-99-19W. WHEREAS, the Town of Oro Valley is a political subdivision of the State of Arizona, and pursuant to Article 13, Section 7 of the Arizona Constitution, is vested with all the rights, privileges, and benefits, which entitles the Town to immunities and exemptions granted to a political subdivision under the Constitution as well as the laws of the State of Arizona and the United States; and WHEREAS, Monterey Homes Construction, LLC (`Monterey Homes') desires to enter into a Line Extension Agreement (`LEA') with the Town for the construction of water facilities at Mira Vista Lots 1-60, attached hereto as Exhibit `1' and incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, Monterey Homes is the owner of property located within the Town, which is more specifically located in Section 3, Township 12 South, Range 13 East; and WHEREAS, Monterey Homes has applied to the Town for approval of the construction of the water facilities under private contract, and OVWU requested the use of oversize water transmission mains to enhance the water system for future growth; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Oro Valley Town Code Section 15-13-2, the Town shall reimburse Eleven Thousand Sixty Five dollars ($11,065.00) to Monterey homes for the material cost difference between what was required by Code to deliver water to Mira Vista Lots 1-60, and the oversize water transmission mains; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Oro Valley Town Code Section 15-12-3, the Council reviewed the LEA at a regular Town Council meeting held March 3, 2002, and determined that the LEA for construction of the water facility under private contract should be approved; and WHEREAS, the LEA is the sole agreement between both parties to provide water service by the Town to Mira Vista Lots 1-60, and the LEA is found to be mutually beneficial to both parties. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and the Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona that the attached Line Extension Agreement between the Town of Oro Valley and Monterey Homes Construction, LLC to provide water service to Mira Vista Lots 1-60, is hereby approved. Oversize LEA Approval Office of the Oro Valley Town Attorney/sib 2.20.02 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that reimbursing Eleven Thousand Sixty Five dollars ($11,065.00) to Monterey Homes Construction, LLC for the material cost difference between what was required by Code to deliver water to Mira Vista Lots 1-60, and the oversize water transmission mains, is hereby approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and any other administrative officials of the Town of Oro Valley are hereby authorized to take such steps as are necessary to execute and implement the terms of the Line Extension Agreement. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council, the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona thisi7 flay of April, 2002. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Paul H. Loomis, Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn E. Cuvelier, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Dan L. Dudley, Town Attorney Oversize LEA Approval Office of the Oro Valley Town Attorney/sib 2.20.02 EXHIBIT `1' LINE EXTENSION AGREEMENT Oversize LEA Approval Office of the Oro Valley Town Attorney/sib 2.20.02 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY AGREEMENT FOR THE OVERSIZING OF WATER FACILITIES UNDER PRIVATE CONTRACT THIS AGREEMENT, authorized by,Section 15-12-3 of the Oro Valley Town Code is made and entered into this dayof D e c eh-Der , 2001 , by and between the Town of Oro Valley, hereinafter called the "Town," and Monterey Homes Cons tructiqrhereinafter called the "Applicant," for the construction of Water Facilities. RECITALS WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Applicant desires to install the Water Facilities to provide service to the project to be known as Lots 1-60 of Mira Vista p roJ located on thep arcel of land legally described in Exhibit A, hereinafter called the "Subject Property;" and WHEREAS, the required plans, specification, and materials for the Water Facilities have been approved by the Town; and WHEREAS, the Applicant desires that the Town take possession of, operate and service the Water Facilities; and WHEREAS, the Town is willing to accept the Water Facilities and permit them to be connected to the Town Water System provided the Water Facilities meet Town standards, are oversized as required and the work is done in accordance with Town requirements; and Now THEREFORE, in consideration of the matters and conditions set forth in this Agreement, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: COVENANTS I. DEFINITIONS,FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS AGREEMENT ONLY. A. SERVICE CONNECTION shall mean action taken by duly authorized Town personnel resulting in actual delivery of water service to a specific premises. B. WATER FACILITIES shall mean those Water Facilities to be constructed under this Agreement for the purpose of providing water service and fire protection to the Subject Property as outlined in Exhibit A. Said Water Facilities shall be outlined within Applicant's Water Facilities Construction cost estimate, attached hereto as Exhibit B, and incorporated herein by this reference. C. WATER INFRASTRUCTURE shall mean any and all permanent or semi-permanent machinery, equipment,e ui ment, water pipes and water mains installed for the purpose of facilitating the A:\LEA.Oversize-Rev 5-21-01.doc 1 delivery of water to the customers of Oro Valley's Water Utility. D. O vERSIZING shall mean the construction of water facilities with a capacity greater than that required for the subject property alone, yet necessary to accommodate future growth of the Town. II. GENERAL A. Upon approval by the Town and at Applicant's own expense, Applicant shall design and p upon approval bythe Town, install, at Applicant's own expense, the Water Facilities as set forth p Pp in the Water Facilities Construction Plan, Oro Valley Plan No. OV 12-99-19W , a true and correct copy of which is on file with the Oro Valley Water Utility. By this reference, the Water Facilities shall collectively refer to those facilities set forth in Oro Valley Plan No. OV 12-99-19W . B. The Water Facilities shall be constructed by a contractor properly licensed by the State of Arizona for the type of work specified. C. Before any service connections are made to the Water Facilities or the Town's water system, all fees, which are then due, shall be paid to the Town pursuant to this Agreement. D. No service connection will be made until the Water Facilities have been accepted by the Town in accordance with the Oro Valley Town Code including, but without limitation to Section 15-12-2. III. APPLICABLE FEES. The Town will require certain applicable fees and charges to be paid Pursuant to Chapter 15 of the Oro ValleyTown Code (the Oro Valley Water Code) and other applicable Arizona State law as amended from time to time prior to providing water service under this Agreement. The Town will take all of the necessary and legal steps to protect its interest, including refusal to providepP water service, if Applicant fails to pay fees when due. Applicant's payment of fees shall not constitute a waiver of its right to seek a refund of the fee; provided, however, that nothing in this Agreement shall be interpreted as a waiver of any applicable statutory claims procedure. IV. ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION. A. Applicant shall employ a Civil Engineer registered in the State of Arizona to design the system and implement the design. Moreover, Applicant will ensure that an Engineer's Y P Certificate of Completion, for the purpose of obtaining an Approval of Construction from the Pima County Department artment of Environmental Quality are both completed for the project prior to anybeing water delivered through the improvements. Title 18, Environmental Quality, Chapter 4, Department Of Environmental Quality, Safe Drinking Water§R18-4-507 (2000). p B. Any inspector ector authorized by the Town shall have full inspection authority over the work P to beP erformed under this Agreement. The Applicant shall furnish the Town Inspector with Water Facilities for obtainingfull information concerning the work. reasonable access to the A:\LEA.Oversize-Rev 5-21-O1.doc 2 p The work shall be subject to Town inspection at all times. Defective work shall be corrected in a manner satisfactory to the Inspector. Town Inspection by the Town does not guarantee the safety 'n soundness of plans prepared by the Applicant's engineer. or engineering C. In the event that, Applicant requests and the Town elects to provide a Town Inspection 40hours in a work period, or on a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday as outside of the normal defined in A.R.S. § 1-301, the Applicant shall compensate the Town for any additional salaries, expenses or employee benefits relatingto such overtime or holiday work. Such additional inspectionto the Applicant. A normal work period shall be defined as 40 costs will be billed pp hours in a seven (7) day workperiod, usually worked on an eight (8) hour day, five(5) day basis, commencing on Monday on and endingFriday, continuing in seven(7) day increments. Nothing Y require the Town to provide inspection on weekends and holidays. If the in this paragraph shall p Town declines to provide inspection on weekends and holidays, Applicant shall have a right to damages against the Town as the result of Town's decision not to perform such weekend and holiday inspections. V. PRE-CONSTRUCTION AND CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURE. A. The Applicant shall submit a written request to begin construction of the Water Facilities Town within five (5)working days prior to the time work is to commence. to the B. No work shall commence until the Town has issued a "Notice to Proceed" which will specify the startingdate and a reasonable time for completion. sp fy C. Applicant shall provide Town with an accurate, written schedule of construction, which shall be updated in a manner sufficient to provide Town the ability to schedule Town inspection personnel. D. Applicant shall submit material certification at the pre-construction meeting. Materials and testing prior to being used in the be available for used in the construction shallsampling Water Facilities. Materials that fail to meet Town specifications shall not be used in construction of the Water facilities as outlined in Exhibit B. pp s expense,The Applicant shall, at A licant' obtain all necessary permits and licenses for work permitted herein, pay comply all fees and com 1 with all laws, ordinances and regulations relating to the work, p ublic health and safety of Applicant's Contractor's and employees. F. No work shall commencepp until the Applicant has obtained a Construction Water Permit from the Oro Valley Water Utility.. All construction water will be metered with an appropriate size water meter and back-flowprevention revention device. The Applicant shall be responsible for obtaining the water meter from the Oro Valley Water Utility; however, the backflow prevention Applicant shall be provided byA licant and shall meet the Oro Valley Water Utility's specifications. G. The work shall commence within five (5) days of the date specified in the "Notice to Proceed." A:\LEA.Oversize-Rev 5-21-01.doc 3 ppH. The Applicant, or Applicant's designated agent, shall be present at all times during performance of the work. The name of the designated agent and the contractor performing the work shall be furnished to the Town before commencement of the work. Instructions given to the designated agent on the work site shall be deemed to have been given to the Applicant. Applicant shall employ only competent and efficient laborers, mechanics or artisans I. The p Y on the project agrees and the Applicant a rees to perform the work diligently to complete the work on or before the completion date given in the"Notice to Proceed." J. The Applicant shall identify and locate all water valves prior to paving and set valve boxes to final grade after paving. K. The Applicant shall, at Applicant's expense, make any and all alterations to the existing water system, either on-site or off-site, necessitated by paving, drainage, or other improvements caused by the development. L. The Applicant shall require all contractors and/or subcontractors to comply with all safety requirements of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 and as may be amended, as set government by the Federal and as implemented by the State of Arizona. The Applicant or Applicant's contractor shall be solelyresponsible for all fines or other penalties provided for by law for any violations of the Act. M. In accordance with the Oro ValleyTown Code and policies relating to the operation of domestic water companies,utility a true and complete copy of the Certificate of Approval to Construct the work issued bythe Arizona Department of Environmental Quality or the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality is attached as Exhibit C, and incorporated herein by this reference. VI. OVERSIZING REQUIREMENT: The Town requires Utilityuires the oversizing of transmission lines that extend the water lines q to the subject property. The Town will refund the oversizing of a transmission line by pert y reimbursing the contractor/developer er for the material cost difference between what was required to deliver water subjectproperty to the eand what was requested to enhance the water system for future growth as outlined within Exhibit D. The Town shall refund Applicant's oversizing costs Town Code § pursuant to Oro Valley15-13-2 (Oversizing Refunds) as may be amended from time to time. VII. DEDICATION Applicant shall, and does,hereby grant, bargain, sell, convey, transfer and deliver the A. The Appli Water Facilities as described in Exhibit B, to the Town, free and clear of all liens, claims, charges or encumbrances, upon final acceptance of the Water Facilities by the Town. A:\LEA.Oversize-Rev 5-21-O1.doc 4 B. The Applicant guarantees the Water Facilities to be free from all failures and or defects or materials fora period of two (2) years from the Town's final due to workmanship and acceptance date. not construct anyutility, building or other improvement that would C. The Applicant shall , . , with the operation or maintenance of the Town's Water Facilities. interferep guarantees The Applicant further that all service lines, meters, and meter boxes will be to pp finish grade and the Applicant will remain responsible for raising/lowering of said services as required until the area described is fully developed. E. The Town shall accept title to and take possession of the Water Facilities upon completion of the Water Facilities to the satisfaction of the Town, and upon acceptance and approval of the Water Facilities, the Town shall operate and maintain the Water Facilities. VIII. INDEMNIFICATION Applicant agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the Town, its Mayor and Council, the Utility Director, appointed boards and commissions, officials, officers, employees Town Water Ut typp ' insurance carriers, individually and collectively,harmless from all losses, claims, and the Town's subrogations, attorney's fees, or actions of any nature resulting from suits, demands, expensesg the actions of Applicantpp or Applicant's contractor or any subcontractor employed by Applicant bodilyinjury and death) or damages to any property or any other losses, claims, suits, (including J ry demands, and/or expenses, arisingalleged to have arisen out of the work to be performed or g hereunder, exceptany such injury or damages arising out of the sole negligence of the Town, its JrY officers, agents or employees. The amount and type of insurance coverage carried by Applicant will in no waybe construed as limiting the scope of indemnity in this paragraph. IX. ACCURACY OF THE RECITALS The parties hereby acknowledge acknowled e the accuracy of the Recitals, which are incorporated herein by this reference. X. NOTICES All notices and communications required by this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be given by personal deliveryor mailed first class, registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, and shall be deemedp received upon the earlier of actual delivery or one hundred twenty (120) hours after deposit in the United States Mail. Such notices and communications should be sent to the following designated ated representatives of the undersigned parties: A:\LEA.Oversize-Rev 5-21-01.doc 5 If to Monterey Homes Construction, Inc. Lisa Hoskin/Monterey Homes Construction, Inc. 4742 N. Oracle Rd. #111 Tucson, Az. 85705 If to Town of Oro Valley Alan Forrest, Water Utility Director Town of Oro Valley 11000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley, Arizona 85737-7016 CC: Chuck Sweet, Oro Valley Town Manager Dan L. Dudley, Oro Valley Town Attorney XI. ATTORNEY'S FEES Should the Town bring anylegal or equitable action for the purpose of protecting or enforcing its rights under this Agreement, the Town shall recover in addition to all other relief, its reasonable attorney's fees and court costs to be fixed by the court. XII. CANCELLATION Under A.R.S. Section 38-511, as amended, the Town may cancel any contract it is a party to within three (3) years after its execution without penalty or further obligation if any person significantly icantl involved in initiating, negotiating, securing, drafting, or creating the contract on the Town is, at anytime while the contract or any extension thereof is in effect, an behalf of . agent of anyother partyto the contract in any capacity or a consultant to any other employee or g party to the contract with respect to the subject matter of the contract. In the event the Town t to exercise its rights under A.R.S. Section 38-511, as amended, the Town agrees to elects g immediately give notice thereof to Applicant. XIII. COMPLIANCE WITH ALL LAWS The parties to this Agreement shall comply with all federal, state and local laws, rules, his regulations, standards and Executive Orders, without limitation to those designated within t g Agreement. The laws and regulations of the State of Arizona shall govern the rights of the parties, the performance of this Agreement and any disputes thereunder. Any action relating to this Agreement shall be brought in an Arizona court. XIV. SEVERABILITY If any provision of this Agreement or the application thereof to any person or A:\LEA.Oversize-Rev 5-21-01.doc 6 circumstance shall be held by a court to be unenforceable to any extent, the remainder of this Agreement and the application thereof shall not be affected and shall be enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. XV. AMENDMENT This Agreement shall not be amended except by written instrument mutually agreed upon and executed by the parties. XVI. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the matters covered by it and supersedes any prior understanding or agreements, oral or written,with respect thereto. The parties shall not be bound by any understanding, agreement, promise, or representation, whether expressed or implied, which is not specified in this Agreement. p XVII. LEGAL JURISDICTION Jurisdiction foray legaln dispute stemming from the performance of the terms of this agreement shall be limited to courts of competent jurisdiction within Pima County. This clause in no way limitsoptionparties'the of the to resolve potential disputes through alternative dispute resolution methods. XVIII. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS This Agreement shall upon be bindingu on the successors and assigns of each of the parties hereto. No assignment, however, shall relieve either party of its obligations hereunder, except an connection with the transfer of title to property to the Town. Such assignment by Applicant In transfer shall relievepp Applicant of its obligations hereunder provided such transferee agrees to be fully bound by the provisions hereof. THIS AGREEMENT shall be bindingupon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the parties; provided however that Applicant may not assign Agreement A reement without prior written consent of the Town. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Applicant A licant has executed or has caused this instrument to be officers hereunto dulyauthorized, and the Town has caused this executed by its proper instrument to be executed proper byits ro er officers thereunto duly authorized, all as of this day and year first above written. A:\LEA.Oversize-Rev 5-21-01.doc 7 "Town" "Applicant" Monterey Homes Construction, Inc. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY By: 4i resident-Tucson Its: Divi Mayor Paul Loomis .r� I Town Manager Chuck Sweet APPROVED AS TO FORM: /5,1)1P Town Attorney STATE OF ARIZONA ) County of Pima ss. g The foregoing instrument was acknowledged beforeme on November > ,by 6th 20 01 Jeffrey R. Grobstein , who acknowledged that s/he is Division President of Monterey Homes Construction Inc. , referred to in this Agreement as "Applicant,"on behalf of the corporation. -k‘jfx,L(li AKA, Nota P b is My iic mmssion expires: ,4, KIMBERLY).GARDNER O'%QW imal (Votary Puk-�` r� . County +,, TExpires 06/ 0/05 A:\LEA.Oversize-Rev 5-21-O1.doc 8 EXHIBITS TO LINE EXTENSION AGREEMENT A Legal description of the Subject Property B Water Facilities Cost Estimate C Certificate of Approval to Construct D Oversizing Refund Schedule A:\LEA.Oversize-Rev 5-21-01.doc 9 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION/MAP OF SUBJECT PROPERTY A:\LEA.Oversize-Rev 5-21-01.doc 10 EXHIBIT "A" NO,00201861 Lots 1 through 60,inclusive and Common Areas A,B,C,D,E and F,of MIRA VISTA,according to the plat of record in the office ofthe County Recorder of Pima County,Arizona,recorded in Book 54 of Maps,Page 2. -3 - . • . I Ati Uri Al MA ALIAL . . A --- 0.42. .........._............ , „,c,:. •. , ..... C.A. A C.A. r e. . 6 ... 5 . 4 Er,::: .4 - 21 22 23 55 .5.ST. 24 .;.,:. A• tP 111,11C' 1 _, 8 19 2 0 25 , -w 2 .....,, 7 4, t, 38 42 i E-4 v.-. Cb c...24 37 •3•9tik? .p 4,,,,,,--'. 9 NII , 1 * _':,,,i 441111 . 18 41k-l' 4 36 ,.,. 43 . • tb 0 • . i 0 4. 28 36 '4' i 0,,4:4111 s3 . • -. —4 45 44 eh".1 34 16 i• • . 30 ill 33 • ,44 •.-::, 444, IV 48 • 46 16 0 c..) ,4 , 59 31 32 „,- • 4.ti ;',..,„ , , . II, At. COPPER Siff DRIVE' 49 A.,_. }-4.,,., ,,.; c.A. if 47 1 ,": 6 87 66 65 c.AJr 54 53 52 61 60 . . €P':-.:s • --• ,,,,-..... .....,.- ........c3,,---,- , -.. ; • .- , .,.., -. ..-_,,.. • ii,'-'t'8.76.7`1.1''''''.---' - ' - - - a - - .- ' _ . apy_ ..„, •6 ,. IIER J I a C*• re _ II DIAMOND CHOLLA PL C0111111Fr‘illpr ($) 45Jitt.P Milliab 1 '1\)''' • ) 1 ---'"--)4)14;FZ' 404 6) . . • ise !4, NEW MH ifil & ON-SITE SEWEF4_* ..- PER THI S PLAN COPPER RIDGE ESTATES II BK. 52 lictP PG. 1 8 CLOVER ROAD • ; EXIST. MN #32 • ' (G-93-014A) /jirr ‘411‘ A III •PROJECT OVERVIEW • . SCALE: 1 =200' • - v t- K r cn O ;7 rn z _ rn 0 .-� O ~1'1 v Pi FLJ ,-, I. pm < m K o N (n 1 • e . , _____1._ )) .- 2..----____,_:-/�-- � _�•• ))J� O -1 z O N'r-' o0 ...... ... .., ..._..„0„/ u, C r Z O"w • ri m m x N m o....1 N in -1 C = 00 0 �p0 rn K - I •-1 z Z 5 > -n 0 y' v xm Or-i • 1-• 0 T .z oo > �' —jr— Z � m PT, • • . lN x, * - 02 .241 ry -.1 - D - Z L�n(n I • ►--. U) ---I --1(D o OC Z I A . x, )3. z cr : • m _. C') r- • m,..�..... Di " 4.0000011111101111 4.- 1 .T.::' le IllieF'. • ' 4 *'.61 m tV " ►•. v = - \ - 0 411-JGNo Cfl dcnrl tv .. . ., 1-, \\soiNier0) -_, sn N- (A , . . 4 A.,, , . . . . SII 03 .4-$0.• -. , .1.4 ' 1 rim ,, : il• :. . . ,....._.;:disr Mrk I W ._... LL • 0 �rI ce.874 o, _.k b N > —II . . 4". , IIIIIII 01) ... N) tx.i . i ill ' 0 I '--37 MI---------I-:- , NNi, . . I . Pli r...: ---10 .,, _ E . - ' ,,,,a . --"... . , _ c.• — NN,, u., ,.-, , .1I_ ti �� emai ,_.. ~�f,, o5 > cp •-.. > xi 0, • ...,.. v I C v �y �.f 0 •.r i MI mill Nk) ,z > u, co4.: I I — X IC13,- .** N____ ' al s i ., _...... - 0 co .. . ._._._ . 4 o I 1 t;31 ti . . '(0 C 23 0 < ..: ' I a 0 MIMI kL , NA ail 2--,.) CO mmi .... E C1,0 ___,:* .___.____ —_-„,,-.::-..,.L..._7-- * - 0 > . -.......—....\ * 0 71 E mai , . ________-_____ ,1 ().1 N \\.......„ , Z ‘di 00 •,......... --.- ,, , ._...•___ - • • Ii, . 04,4 • ,' - - --- --01) Z lin< . P� o.___ CA 14C.� mil .. )11° -p. a O I • . iiii:-.:.______:_l'•_____:_ii-______------ K-------In> .. . . . . , 2, . EXHIBIT B WATER FACILITIES COST ESTIMATE LOTS 1-60 MIRA VISTA The cost estimate for water infrastructure installation is $179,280.15 as per the attached contactors invoice. • C:\My Documents\LEA\LEA.Oversize-Rev 5-21-01.doc 11 0000 0 000000 LO Lt) 00 LO 00000000 r- 0) 00C) 0 0) 00000 (0 Nr0N- 00000000 a) 06C56Op ci (000000N- M 0 - 0) 00 O00000 M - +� CON- C N. CO 0) N0t LI) NI- -4- Lt) (0 - (00N00N0) C') h- ,--- T- a) C co N (D 0) Lt) M M tt) t` 0) CD 1.0 0 0) N- IX) (O CO V N LO G) CO V C) X 0 tO (D c r cr) 0 tri- 0 M r- Nr LOT- M N- T- N fit) ,t N M - N M O `13 0 0 r- co N- T- M 0) N ID 00 1.0 LO V- (0 p N -p Q co � O O O � O M .L co (Y) Q to to (f to (ft W Q N (I E O 0 NCO '-- N ' MOON0) '- e'- V (O � O0 (0OOC CONCO CD 0 5r-- V T a 0 z, N �' T- 0 (0O CD N V OONCD p O CD 0) N-- - (D O) LO N- V. O _�Zji LN0 '� N �" N 0 0 11_J 0-MIo 0 co. co 2 4 CI a) c ti ti Co � � o 0 0 Z QE M M OC Lil >. � ta V> 1--- Q o O N U o o U 15 Z' (NI N C L fa U 0 U Z (. 0 0 0 (0 t O 0 0 0 0 0 0 (0 U) 0 0 (0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 CO CO (D LO CV 0) 0 0 0 0 0 CD it) c' 0 N. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U z 'Es NI: (0U) L000CDQQN- c�i o � aiootti00000 � N- 0N �O 0) N0LI) "1' OM �t LO COtt ( 0NCON0 C*) N Z I-z Cl) = tiNO '- T- MMLON- t) O 0) (Dt0) N. LO CO CONtN (O0) MV O 0 10 (O O N tet'0 LOU) CO- LI) �- M N- N-- N LO '�fi N Cr;,-- Wn Q T- CO N- N V 0 N (0 CO L-O in 1- T T- Q > Q. p to tO to to V> Z 0 -a >, (/) 0) 00 JJWWWWJ JJJJJWWW WWW O LL- a) " 0 Z ;-• T- OONti MOONO) - T- 'V CD (OOOtO00CDMNM U CO 0) N tO O (C) N V 0 0 N CO O 0 U) a3, V (O CO CO '� T- CO 0) L) T- Z E--- 1120 LOCO CO OMM ‘-' N J U O T-- U co W :1-j o 0 (00LI 000000 L0 00 (000000000 O pa_ N c V MM00 ( • CONOOOOCD (Dtt) 0) 00000000 • < tri. O •L 0O r- CO 0C') tI (000N- T- CO Ni ori OtOLO00LO0 O N 0 a NLC) tO (DOM VM00 (Dt0 C') ' ' CO CO a) coNco (00) 0LOV' MCr) CO >+ C t V-. `� T'- T- Ca D ta 6R ta O > - c E a) E ca c c E 76 'ci .E a)LciL C3) Q. di,... L- L- c to .n 0 C L to L-- > O L cn J ° C) O O O 3 C) C) N a) "�, L a) IL p � � � 0D > v Mtn C 0°) ooa. '� Q a• — CD c o CC Q_ co al rn.0 o i a) o Q. a) CO O 0) 0 OQ n c � O UVUO � � > o N — i c c u) Cj a) i a) -0 O O 17 CO O N- ti E Q O (1) aso _O a) -X Nooccs) t°O > > 0 T- p L- R3 3MU) p EW C JNNJM CQ > > > Z7 -t5 cEv •• 0 3 (9 (00 ° JU -ccao0 UJJUJ > cocoCo0L ° O Y Q Q LU as x 00 00 :;:t. i-- CV '- Op t '- CO Cl :CO (D '1t' N N o z � � � o • O O c ,_ T- N CO Vr- N M �t 0 CD f` (v '�7 tri (6 ti U > cu O O O co E a_ H O LL 00000 LC) 00000 T- a) o004o 0 to z - N 't G) CO 0 0 aoaoC)' 0C) o E a) a) E ' - O r- CD � CO � ,mac L C o 3 ca a I 1 1 1 1 1 -0 4... a) C 0O � Ea ea L 5 El42 L (13 L U a O 0000to O 0000 r' C el to co co a) °CA co cn = '— tom- 4 O) T- N O '- Co Co Co '- C) ;6 E ' O 6H Eft ` Q) - W - Q Q Q Q j› „ WWW W Q ,L C T- co -t CO T-- r. 0 PCS 1L 0 ) Z p ,... U c,„ ] 0 C O O O o 0 0 5 (1 tf) J J COC T- r- r ) eL 2 D C Q te D - 9--- O a) a) 1 +r L.. O a) a) > a) ci) as f C ' co V U_ C a) V) a) > �E �' 1 fl -' a) a) E -X ill co _ a) •CO CSU) W o s N CL L Cl. n a)-43 a) a) C1 E -4 w -g,.0 -13 1-5 u) 5ft >U OQ o ) O C v Q a) Q C •- 0 H L. t O D Z N � -V itch- U 7 U ° U 2 ) .5 2),) -E. .._ c.; cyi 4 tri ai 3 a 6 F— U u. EXHIBIT C CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT A:\LEA.Oversize-Rev 5-21-01.doc 12 08/31/2001 11:45 FAX 5208817492 WLB GROUP a007/007 5G PIMA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNICAL SERVICES DIVISION 130 West Congress--Tucson, Arizona 85701-1317 Telephone : 740-3340 CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT Water and/or Wastewater Facilities System Name : ORO VALLEY WATER COMPANY System No. : 10-164 Project Owner: TOWN OF ORO VALLEY WATER COMPANY Address : 11000 N. LA CANADA BLVD, ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA 85737 Project Location: T-12-S, R-13-E, SECTION 3 County: PIMA Description: WATER LINE EXTENSION TO SERVE MIRA VISTA, LOTS 1-60 Pipproval to construct the above described facilities as represented in the approved plan on file with the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality is hereby given subject to the following provisions: THE PIMA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY (740-3340) MUST BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE TO SCHEDULE PRESSURE TESTING AND MICROBIOLOGICAL TESTING. AFTER COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION, A FINAL INSPECTION BY A LICENSED ENGINEER, AND THE RECEIPT OF AN ENGINEER' S CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION, ALL APPLICABLE TESTING DOCUMENTATION, AND ACCURATE "AS BUILT" PLANS TO PIMA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY. AN APPROVAL OF CONSTRUCTION MAY BE ISSUED BY THE DEPARTMENT IF ACCEPTABLE. Che State law, A.R. S . 49-353 , requires that construction of the project must be Ln accordance with the rules and regulations of the Arizona Department of 3nvircnmental Quality. :f prosect includes trenching, land stripping, earthmoving or road construction, an air ruality activity permit may be required pursuant to P. C. C. Title 17 .12 .470 :f construction has not started within one year of the date of this issue, this :ertificate will be void and a written extension of time shall be required. )ate Approved: October 23, 2000 URS ULA KRAMER DIRECTOR r• BY s Eric Shepp, P. E . Civil Engineer :c : P-File No. P038400 P-A.DEQ, SRO ACC P-Oro Valley Water Company (0V12-99-19W) Engineer- The WL$ Croup P-PCDEQ EXHIBIT D OVERSIZING REFUND SCHEDULE LOTS 1-60 MIRA VISTA ITEM Quantity_ 12" cost 8"cost Difference PVC Pipe 760' 11020.00 5700.00 5320.00 Fittings 6 1710.00 636.00 1074.00 PVC Meg-a-Lugs 21 1575.00 819.00 756.00 PVC Joint restraints 12 1500.00 696.00 804.00 Ductile Iron Pipe 20' 390.00 242.00 148.00 DIP Meg-a-Lugs 4 300.00 156.00 144.00 DIP Joint Restraints 2 370.00 116.00 254.00 Valves 5 3975.00 1410.00 2565.00 20,840.00 9775.00 11,065.00 TOTAL COST DIFFERENCE $11,065.00 See attached contractor quote and invoices for cost verifications. C:\My Documents\LEA\LEA.Oversize-Rev 5-21-01.doc 13 lia, .. ' Cli BORDERLAND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. • POST OFFICE BOX 27406 0 TUCSON, ARIZONA 85726-7406 400 EAST 38THSTREET`® TUCSON, ARIZONA 85713 • (520) 623-0900 • FAX (520) 623-0232 AZ Contractors License Nos. 070868-002A • 045027-007B-04 January 31, 2002 Mr. Jeff Gereke Terramar Properties 2200 E. River Road, Suite 105 Tucson, Arizona 85718 Reference: Mira Vista Subdivision Oversizing Waterline Dear Jeff: The enclosed breakdown of material costs represents the costs for 12" and 8" waterlines. -f Should you have any questions, please call me. Sincerely, CT-----26274)''---- Toby Allen Project Manager horn Enclosure xc: Lisa Hoskins, Monterey Homes , +.,_,, i 4ts.t-v'./ ilv' iv v J. 1 V.vV I L'L., -1'.L_Jll VL I rte1•.JLtiJVLJ�LJL r r-icC c. i BORDERLAND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC. VERBAL QUOTATION 1./lg __Q4L Sec. : - __- - 1.,r.RV yJ„.r.__�_ /\.\_...•,...._.:r1�^•_-w•`Y"'..1Iw•,M•I.,``•A h Y.•V .1 Bid on: Date: 77c(M”. m.4. / . �, J ' // % a IL Bidder - FirmPhone By - Quoted To: Per Plans & Specs. : Y e s i I Non BASE BID: - ------_---_-__-- - - Alternate: Alternate: Al ternate: Alternate: Alternate: Alternate: . Addenda Recd: • Complete in P l aceLI F.O. B. Jobs i teLi F.O. B. R.R.❑ Sales Tax: included❑ To be addedEl Sewer Fee Li Bond Included: Yesil N0LJ Oe-icr ipt lan, qual if lcat Ions, Remarks., Etc. Item No, Quantity Unit aid Total Bid /cP A 4?LiC" , . 1 t CD st -mo • I ii)oz,1 r /4." r ti-i4 1,04\ff cio 414— ‘ie• , 13-14C° 4" iwi - - __ •, , ._.1?..____ __Q.J.±-3 R e4-4,...,d To- C..a sm"1-- I,2, 44.• . . i5104) -- / 9 a' D i (...0$ + 4.2 31°'I 0' 1 *' rP /11e1-- ut. Com- � � _.. _...�1 .__/.w_.YA►.v_.._.\.\_'.L_._�.-�-e _- -_�-., LI',,___Ihr;) Pil' f‹,S4e41-1111 - C.P.S+ 2,--ca, , _._.__ , j _ 1.'1 UtA.Itir 5 .., -, 3-707 I . .......„ 1 v ri-- 1l0....:;71,474:T.efr(LI cls 1 1wM\_..__.� - �Ir-L•I I'.••:.L..-I,L.Ar.__..1.1:.�.191Mw A..IY.I..1� • / ' II 4— . . di jr?..Ve--- 74 0 i _.1,5470._2(?_7 . ______ . —,, "g' ial 1 Niiik4 b“, i 'i 4,36 , ti,t i— ' /ki t Iv....., I 6,,. . . _. Yi V' 1--- se" ,►t2--tg- .___ V' D I P ?-te , . 2.0.– , ;40 / - • . ••• • __.•.. ...• •. • e' ivi. 4%-6,-- Le?5 . _ It"... .... 1.64,7. ia 1,57 1 k-4. kce . 3.‘,.., ( It.- . _ __ a- w►wr_J i" U Alt VC. 5441/4- fa cr ........... .......•.,••• ....••..,..... ....,___..........•......•....,....._•....,•._, r; l'ik I - '` }W 9, a _may`~ HE ik Order Acknowledgement UPC Vendor Tn of e Date Order # 0000008049524-00 1 oust #; 1570000 ate PO Page 1 Bill To; BORDERLAND CONSTRUCTION CO. L• rres"ponder To= i�ana 4epner Cozpan'v, Inc. 10i 38TH ST 700 Alcott Street 7 POB 27406 TUCSON, AZ 85726-7406 Denver, CO 80 4 Ship To: ITA VISTA instructions TANOERI NE/VERCH WAY Ship Point Via Shipped Terms TUCSON, AZ 25713 Dana Kepner Company, Inc. Net 30 Days . .,-.....!a-t4..!,,:,..,.„-,..:::,__,.,:•.,..•••••..,,,_,::,.•:.,::....:, ter Product UPC Tuan ..i.ty Duantity ` DuantitY .Qtyi' Unit Price Discount Amount Ln# And Description it evil Ordered 8.0. Shipped U . Price Multiplier (Net) 1 712200 00000 _ 18 PCS 14 50 /ft 0.00 11020.00 12"X20' CLASS 200 PIPE, 0900 AVO.DR 14 i r 2 PCS 250.00r' 500.00 2 1851222 €0000 2 12" NJ 22-1/2 BEND, CL, sp#y Di, LESS ACCE '. r 2 2 0.00 510.00 3 18L1245 2 pti 555,. 12" NJ 45 BEND, CL, SS8, DI, LESS ACOS t 4 1�8L 12TMF 2 2 PCS 350.0 S 3 0.00 700.@0 12" MJXMJXF TEE, CL, SSB D i,. LESS ACCE F+y y 5 312012PV 00000 21 0 21 PCS 75. SCS:,.N.,..;':' 0.0e 1575.00 12" #2012PV MECHANICAL RESTRAINT FOR PVC <xr. L E (COLOR CODED RED) • 00 6 311612 ,:: 12 0 12 `CS 125.004.4rI:P ? i 15 . 1:" #1612 EBAA BELL RESTRA ifR C900PIPE s JIr t : CONSISTINO OF 2 RINGS & 4.BOLTS i 7 0312350 1 0 1 ACS 21. - 'ft 0.00 380.63 •12" X 18,1-1/2-" PC 350 TYTON JT° 9 ' , . Y DUCTILE IRON pIAE-ANSI A21.511 yY ..M HS 0.00 300.00 0 4 • PCS} t. :a. 7 r, Crvs < 'k e,,Y wx w12" #1112 MECHANICAL RESTRAINT kf4:<WMFw.£f1;:DYR x; 00 FOR DUCTILE IRON PIP_ ; j .,s_0n,�. e, • UPC Vendor Invoice Bate Order Order Ac knows cgement HEVMLn 000000 804952`-1 'O Date -'O # r Poe Cust #: 15700000 Bill To: BORDERLAND CONSTRUCTION CO, Correspondence To: Dana Kepner Company, Inc. 400 E. 38TH ST 700 Alcott Street POB 2740E TUCSON, AZ 85726-7406 Denver, CO 80204 Ship To: NIRA VISTA Instructions BORDERLAND CONST TANGERINE/VERCH WAY Ship Point Via Shipped Terms TUCSON, AZ 85713 Dana Kepner Company, Inc, Net 30 Days 3 r.f � Price Discount Amount tProduct UPC Quantity' uantity Quantity ty. UnitiC " UN Multiplier (Net) Ln# And Description Ite®# Urdere0B. , Shipped UN .Pric 1 0708200 00000 - 38 0 38 PCS 7.5 /f t 0.00 5700.00 8"X20' CLASS 200 PIPE, C900 PVC BR 14 2 18L0845 00000 2 0 2 PCS75,Q 0.00 150.00 3:rr 8" NJ 45 BEND, CL, 588, BIj1 E ACCS 3 18L0822 2 0 2 PCS 72.50 FSS 0.00 145.00 8" NJ 22-1/2 BEND, CL, S�, ;DI-, LESS ACCS 4 18LOBTMF 'i P<<�•1 2 0 2 PCS 170.50 PC8 .. 0.00 341.00 f 8" NJXMJXF TEE, 585, BI,:LE ACCS 5 312008PV f�,Fj!f, 21 0 21 PCS 39.00 �. 0.00 819.00 8" #2008PV MECHANICAL RESTRAINT FOR PVC (COLOR CODED RED) 'a w LT 6 311608 00000.... 12 0 12 PCS 58. _:::.PCS...::' 0.00 696.00 8" #1608 EBAA BELL RESTRAINER FOR C900 PIPE CONSISTING OF 2 RINGS &43 X78 :..L`w r 7 0308350 etk'i,r,tf�x I SM1ki,•-.41 0 1 PCS 13.355 'ft 0.00 241.S7 8" X 18'1-1/2" PC 350 TYTON JrAi4�h � 42t DUCTILE IRON VIAE-ANSI A21.511):1‘` ,a. 8 311 108 00000 8 Kt F x PCS �,""+ 0.00 1i , 00 8" #1108 MECHANICAL RESTRAINT •x �2 a:M { .=�r 2 FOR DUCTILE IRON PIPE (COLOR CODED BLACK f a�. a r ` :, ,n 58.9 311708 00000 2 .,,k . M< h. w �-, - .PC5 E PCS 0.00 116.00 8" #1708 SOLID BELL RESTRAINT HARNESS DIFOR PIP= PI ♦> 7 r,_.,. • foE } N2:',;04741.4;;i4;',';',..,..w � S 2J2 ;0 A , , o 1410.00 10 43L08ML Pd f6 Fd ,f ' ;' <zr .• 4t wt �t, i MB' MJ R! OL TLVE LESS 5 ol . SK rX+" : r rof ' ' .i tt t \ Y� �},itt: _ ,01.tK i Z rv -'4a 10 O} Shipped Total ROOOP.iiii& } t , a # 9774.97Lines Total . _ i.,♦. ,,,;,.41....4 .........„:„,.., <k r', fl,,,,,,,,,,t3ma..dr_.Y tiy z >; r t.A x :cearfS97e7 ifi ita . o>i. yV : ie th_ a•:..T.. ytr v ,•' >K'.•.qt+r r.{t...„>fZ.-,ri[P.wi..f/.�..ti! 'tit"s^aryr,7<rry A,• .'..*.X.aY°3 S?.'....3.3.Z<xt.�:X ....r.... �.dajSwp'AyrL Vy.,k ..}°! ,s�S -r,: ..0. 4 )K 3 .,2 . . ` 4 .y1c :.••',:-:•:•i:::,•-:-.;:,-;'. s.'...';'7..,7:.1i :::'::•'..,::',',: x�r„i ^ j ak <H s•' { ` ! Xrx arr Yx,iv *> : ; < � '- ' • s ' h •.h„ Y 1 r•'\ f .> bi , `+cifsSa# T$Yr' X jq '' rr4. - �ry ° «:.. .a ^ r3!tr ' Kw . t f :t.` > �^h• {: t * *.;; o. kafl t.7:, d. :. s .',s 4^� ie ) wWs )A tl'tlh . � t } "A:', :4:',0,'....:t:Dkb *< i w N > Ali.',',..f,-.,:r. r.f Yt .t ; 4.;<es: . 1 :.: a,.a . !)>.M.s.... ;: •f•,i.i ,,,,.....,••••,......,,,,,,.. .:54.• ;:,.. v ; yadyZgvr `«°SS:...RnTC.M.N<1:+N w ++Whr Last Pane TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Page 1 of 2 _OUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: 04/17/02 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: DAN DUDLEY, TOWN ATTORNEY CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING SUBJECT: DISCUSSION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CITIZENS FOR OPEN GOVERNMENT V. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, U.S. DISTRICT COURT CAUSE NO. CIV 01-393 TUC-FRZ. 15, 2001, a sign enforcement officer of the Town of Oro Valley on a routine check of SUMMARY: On August . the Town became aware that political signage was being displayed within the James D. signage throughout Park. Upon investigation, the enforcement officer noted that the Citizens for Open Government Kriegh Townp g . relatingto a referendumpetition, the deadline for filing of which tolled on August 20, 2001. had signs displayed The sign enforcement officer, pursuant to her understanding of our (then) code, advised the plaintiffs that the were in violation of OVZCR 12-602 (A)(8) & § 12-602 (A)(11) and asked that the signs be plaintiff's signs § removed. The signs were initially removed by the plaintiffs and the enforcement officer did not issue a Notice of Illegal Sign day.n until later that da . That Notice provided that if the signage was not removed by August 22, 2001 a citation would be issued. . rior to the date upon which a citation was to be issued the signage was removed and the period for gathering for the referendum petition ended. No citations were subsequently issued. Nevertheless, the signatures o plaintiffs filed this pursuant action to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 & 28 U.S.C. § 1343 seeking attorney fees and damages for violation of firstrightsspeech.amendment of free s eech. The premise upon which the lawsuit was based was that the Town's Sign Ordinance differentiated between the treatment of political signage and commercial signage permitting commercialsignage si public land in circumstances where political signage was prohibited. The g on Town, which was in the process of amendingits Sign Ordinance to cure this shortcoming at the time of filing of this action by plaintiffs, admitted to the defect in its ordinance and has voluntarily admitted responsibility. plaintiffs have continued to pursue this matter and have incurred additional legal fees. It is the point However, opinion of Trial Counsel and the Town Attorney that the financial risks of continuing litigation in this matter to contest fees and damages necessitates recommendation of settlement ATTACHMENTS: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Trial Counsel for the Town and the Town Attorney recommend that the parties enter into a sp judgmentti ulated for $26,000 (including $20,790 for attorney fees) for fees, costs and damages. FISCAL IMPACT: See Recommendation. F•\('.nnnril\Rronlar\6117117.Cr rr(:iti7rnc fnr()nen Onv(14119(1 rior TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Page 2 of 2 JOUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: 04/17/02 SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to accept the joint recommendation of Trial Counsel and the Town Attorney recommending a Stipulated Entry of Judgment in the above matter in the amount of$26,000 for attorney fees, p costs and damages. , Pit Town Attorney OLGE '4 Town Manage F•\CrninriI\Rrot la-\O41707('C re Citi7rnc fnr()nen Cm'0409(17 dnr TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: April 17, 2002 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Paul K. Nzomo,P.E., Engineering Division Manager SUBJECT: Award of contract for Saguaro Relocation for the La Canada Extension, Project No. OV 30 00/01 09 SUMMARY: The package for this Council Communication will be distributed tomorrow, April 11, 2002 after a meeting This afternoon with the property owners of the Saguaro Cactus. r • TOWN OF ORO VALLEY ADDENDUM COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: April 17, 2002 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Paul K.Nzomo,P.E Engineering Division Manager SUBJECT: Resolution (R) 02- 31 Acceptance of bids and award of contract for Project No. OV 30-00/01-09 Saguaro Relocation for La Canada Drive/Tangerine Road intersection. SUMMARY: The Town of Oro Valley Public Works Department is currently engaged in the planning and design of three major transportation projects; all three projects share the intersection of La Canada Drive / Tangerine Road. The first project involves the widening of Tangerine Road to four lanes from First Ave to La Canada Drive. The second project is La Canada Drive Extension; this will be a new four lane roadway from Tangerine to Moore. The third project is La Canada Drive widening to four lanes from Naranja Drive to Tangerine Road. Last year the Town hired a consultant to study saguaro sa aro and find out if the saguaro is healthy and can be transplanted. The consultant found that the saguaro is healthy and if transplanted using different techniques rather than conventional methods, the saguaro has a high survival rate. These findings were presented to the Mayor and Town Council in a study session in October 2001. This project involves the following: 1. The bracing of the specimen saguaro cactus as required for transplanting. 2. Excavation of a root ball 3. Treatment/inoculation of exposed/cut roots. 4. Boxing of the saguaro cactus root ball. 5. Construction and filling of the stem support tube. 6. Lifting and relocation of the saguaro. 7. Replanting of the saguaro cactus. 8. Post transplant monitoring and plant maintenance work. 9. Backfilling of the excavation. 10. Clean up of all soil, debris and excess material from the project site. In response to the advertisement for bids,the Town received one bid proposal. The bid proposals were opened by Town staff at 2:00 P.M. on April 3,2002. The following is a summary of the bids received along with the engineer's estimate: 1. Native Resources $ 39,723.50 Engineers estimate $ 50,000.00 c TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENTS: Resolution(R) 02-31 FISCAL IMPACT: Funding for this project is available from budgeted Town/PAG funds for the 00/01 fiscal year. RECOMMENDATION: Public Works staff recommends the awarding of this contract to Native Resource through the adoption of the attached resolution. SUGGESTED MOTION: The Council may wish to consider one of the following motions: I move to approve Resolution(R)02 - 31 OR I move to deny Resolution(R) 02 -31 c:22A--%-1(4-k m ------ ------- Paul Nzomo P.E, Engineering Div. Manager - ----C,,, [ A. Janse fora To Engineer ). dr huck Swe-., own Man er RESOLUTION NO. (R) 02- 31 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, APPROVING AUTHORIZATION FOR THE MAYOR TO CONTRACT WITH NATIVE RESOURCES FOR SAGUARO RELOCATION AT LA CANADA DRIVE / TANGERINE ROAD INTERSECTION. WHEREAS, the Saguaro relocation is within the future Town's property and is necessary to the public health, safety and welfare; and WHEREAS, the Town Council deems it necessary, in the interest of providing for the health, safety and welfare to the citizens of Oro Valley, to authorize the Mayor to contract with Native Resources for Saguaro relocation. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE MAYOR AND THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY,ARIZONA: That the Mayor is authorized to contract with Native Resources for the Saguaro relocation. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this 17 day of Apr i 1 , 2002 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY,ARIZONA Paul H. Loomis,Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Kathryn E. Cuvelier, Town Clerk Dan Dudley, Town Attorney 3 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY r COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: 04-17, 2002 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Terry Vosler Building Safety Administrator SUBJECT: ORDINANCE NO. (0) 02- 12 , AMENDING CHAPTER 6, BUILDING, OF THE TOWN CODE OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY TOWN CODE, SECTION 6-1-4 ADOPTION OF UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE; PROVIDING FOR FEE AMMENDMENTS TO THE UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE AND TOWN OF ORO VALLEY AMENDMENTS TO THE UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. BACKGROUND: The Town has adopted and currently enforces the 2000 edition of the Uniform Administrative Code. The contains the fee schedules used calculating permit fees. Permit fees are Uniform Administrative Code of within the Uniform Administrative Code using the calculated cost calculated from tables located in Valuation Data Schedules currently being used for calculating construction costs construction. The Building 20, 1995. Also, the Town has not made it a practice to charge forelectrical, have not been revised since January red in a mechanical and plumbing permits when such work is being performed along with the work cove building permit. Separate electrical, mechanicaland plumbing lumbin permit fees are charged by many jurisdictions • In addition, the Town is not assessing fees for the issuance of ,ncluding Pima County, Tucson and Marana. a.riances to use alternate methods of design, construction or materials. The construction codes adopted by the Town require that an alternative material, design or method of construction be approved, when requested, and when sufficient evidence of compliance is submitted to substantiate any claims made regarding the use of methods of construction. The Codes require that the building official alternative materials, alternate design and . ' and that it complies with the intent of the provisions of the codes. find that the proposed design is satisfactory p official finds that the material, method or work offered is, for the purpose The Codes require that the building intended, at least the equivalentprescribed of that in the codes in quality, strength, effectiveness, fire resistiveness, durability and safety. In cases, In manylarge portions of staff time is spent in the documentation, g research and verification of the applicability of alternative materials, designs or methods of construction as pp y required by the codes. This Ordinance, if approved, would amend The 1997 Uniform Administrative Code Table 3-A Building ' n Data schedule as published in the most current edition of the Permit Fees, to require that the Building Valuation "BuildingStandards" magazine published by the International Conference of Building May-June edition of g Wittier, California 90601-2298, be used in calculating the valuation of Officials, 5360 Workman Mill Road, The "good" classifications shall be used for residential construction. work to be done under a permit. g Structures also approve the adoption of a Town of Oro Valley Miscellaneous Approval of this ordinance will pp p attached as Exhibit B. This Ordinance would also establish electrical, Building Valuation Data Schedule, plumbing ° of the buildingpermit fee for electrical, mechanical and p g mechanical and plumbing permit fees at 10/o buildingpermit. This Ordinance would also establish a fee work that is included with the work allowed under a of$100.00 to file for an Appeal To The Building Official To Use Alternate Materials, Alternate Designs And lethods Of Construction. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY ,OUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 2 FISCAL IMPACT: approving this ordinance will be an increase in fees collected issued by the Building Safety The fiscal impact of app g Division for permits and plan reviews. The additional amount of fees collected is projected to be within a range of$350,000 to $475,0000 for the fiscal year of 2002-2003. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Staff recommends that Mayor and Council approve Ordinance No. (0) 02 - 12 . SUGGESTED MOTION: The Council may wish to consider the following motion: toadopt Ordinance No. (0) 0212 , amending Chapter 6, Building, of the Town Code of the Town of I move p Oro Valley lle Town Code, Section 6-1-4 Adoption of Uniform Administrative Code; providing for fee amendments to the Uniform Administrative Code and town of Oro Valley Amendments to the Uniform .dministrative Code. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Exhibit 1 it A: Town of Oro ValleyAmendments To The Uniform Administrative Code Table 3-A as proposed. Exhibit B: Town of Oro ValleyMiscellaneous Structures Building Valuation Data Table as Proposed 2. 3. Exhibit C: Town of Oro ValleyAmendments To The Uniform Administrative Code Table 3-B as proposed. 4. Exhibit D: Town of Oro ValleyAmendments To The Uniform Administrative Code Table 3-C as proposed. 5. Exhibit E: Town of Oro ValleyAmendments To The Uniform Administrative Code Table 3-D as proposed. 6. Ordinance No. (0) 02- 12 \,____ i i 41 Ai _Add B ilding afety Administrator 7si A y-:..1 L Community Development Director / Al 1,r,__/ _i own Man.ger EXHIBIT A TABLE 3 -A- -BUILDING PERMIT FEES TOTAL VALUATION FEE $1.00 to$500.00 $23.50 $501.00 to$2,000.00 $23.50 for the first$500.00 plus$3.05 for each additional$100.00,or fraction thereof,to and including$2,000.00 $2,001.00 to$25,000.00 $69.25 for the first$2,000.00 plus$14.00 for each additional$1,000.00,or fraction thereof, , to and including$25,000.00 $25,001.00 to$50,000.00 $391.75 for the first$25,000.00 plus$10.10 for each additional$1,000.00,or fraction thereof, to and including$50,000.00 $50,001.00 to$100,000.00 $643.75 for the first$50,000.00 plus$7.00 for each additional$1,000.00,or fraction thereof, , to and including$100,000.00 $100,001.00 to$500,000.00 $993.75 for the first$100,000.00 plus$5.60 for each additional$1,000.00,or fraction thereof, to and including$500,000.00 $500,001.00 to$1,000,000.00 $3,233.75 for the first$500,000.00 plus$4.75 for each additional$1,000.00,or fraction thereof,to and including$1,000,000.00 1 000 001.00 and up $5,608.75 for the first$1,000,000.00 plus$3.65 for each additional$1,000.00,or fraction $1,000,001.00 thereof Other Inspections and Fees: $47.00 per hour* 1. Inspections outside normal business hours(minimum charge-two hours) per hour* 2. Reinspection fees assessed under provisions of section 305.8 $47.0000 per 3. Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated(minimum charge one-half hour) hour* $47.00 per hour* 4. Additional plan review required by changes,additions or revisions to plans(minimum charge one-half hour) Actual Cohour* * 5. For use of outside consultants for plan checking and inspections or both ctual 6. Plan review fee for model home from approved model plan 60.00 7. REVIEW FEE FOR APPEALS TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL TO USE ALTERNATE MATERIALS,METHODS OF DESIGN AND METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION. $100.00 8. THE DETERMINATION OF CONSTRUCTION VALUATIONS USED IN CALCULATING BUILDING PERMIT FEES SHALL BE BASED ON THE BUILDING VALUATION DATA SCHEDULE AS PUBLISHED IN THE MOST CURRENT EDITION OF THE MAY-JUNE EDITION OF "BUILDING STANDARDS"MAGAZINE PUBLISHED BY THE INTERNATIONAL COMFERENCE OF BUILDING OFFICIALS,5360 WORKMAN MILL ROAE,WITTIER,CALIFORNIA 90601-2298 AND THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY MISCELANEOUS STRUCTURES BUILDING VALUATION DATA SCHEDULE. THE"GOOD"CLASSIFICATIONS SHALL BE USED FOR RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCION. fit of the *Orthe total hourlycost to the jurisdiction,whichever is the greatest.This cost shall include supervision,overhead,equipment,hourly wages and fringe benefits employees involved. **Actual costs include administrative and overhead costs. EXHIBIT B TOWN OF ORO VALLEY MISCELLANEOUS STUCTURES BUILDING VALUATION DATA SCHEDULE CONCRETE SLABS AND WALKS 2.67 sq. ft. (Other than as listed under 20a) Concrete and asphaltic concrete pavement and parking areas 2.20 sq. ft. INTERIOR STUD PARTITIONS (Commercial) 29.00 per lin. ft. OPEN PORCHES (Commercial) 28.88 sq. ft. OPEN PORCHES (Residential) 10.44 sq. ft. ROOM ADDITIONS (residential and commercial) cost per square foot of all room additions shall be that of the building to which the addition is attached, except that the building official may in his discretion reduce that valuation if he determines such to be necessary and reasonable. ALUMINUM ROOF STRUCTURES (without slabs) Residential Patio Covers 4.87 sq. ft. Add for Screening .97 sq. ft. Commercial 13.92 sq. ft. FIREPLACES Single 1,740.00 each Dual 2,320.00 each Pre-Fab 1,160.00 each STORAGE SHEDS No Floor 5.22 sq. ft. With Floor 7.89 sq. ft. TRAILER SPACES FOR UTILITY Installation & Slab to Space (new) 2,320.00 Installation at Existing Space with Slab 1,160.00 RETAINING WALLS Two Feet High 9.51 lin. ft. More Than Two Feet High 9.51 lin. ft. *Plus $2.10 lin. ft. for each additional foot over 2 feet PATIO WALLS 4"Block 6"Block On top of 8"Block On top of Retng. Wall Retng. Wall 5' high 10.73 13.01 10.73 14.27 11.89 6' high 11.89 15.43 13.01 16.65 14.27 SWIMMING POOLS Valuation Calculation based on total Surface Area as described below. Building Fees calculated from Table 3-A. Total Surface Area Valuation Result Up to 99 sf $8,120.00 100— 199 sf $8,990.00 200—340 sf $9,860.00 $9,860.00 for the first 340 sf plus $29.00 Over 340 sf for each additional 1 sf, or fraction thereof POOL ENCLOSURES Wood Fences 3.25 lin. ft. Chain Ll •nk 3.02 lin. ft. 4' High 10.44 lin. ft. Masonry g Wrought lion 11.60 lin. ft. EXHIBIT C 1997 UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE TABLE 3-B:ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES Permit Issuance $23.50 1. For the issuance of each electrical permit 2.For the he issuingof each supplemental permit for which the original permit has not expired,been canceled,or finaled 7.25 System Fee Schedule (Note:The following do not include permit-issuing fee.) 1. New Residential Buildings The followingfees shall include all wiring and electrical equipment in or on each building,or other electrical equipment on the same premises constructed at the same time. For new multifamily buildings(apartments and condominiums)having three or more dwelling units constructed at the Multifamily. 0.050 same time,not including the area of garages,carports and accessory buildings,per square foot(0.09 m2) includingthe Single-and two-family.For new single-and two-family residential buildings constructed at the same time and not0.056 area of garages, carports and accessory buildings,per square foot(0.09 m2) to existingresidential buildings,0use56 the For other types of residential occupancies and for alterations,additions and modifications Unit Fee Schedule. 2. Private Swimming Pools For newP rivate,in-ground swimming pools for single-family and multifamily occupancies,including a complete system of necessary branch circuit wiring,bonding,grounding,underwater lighting,water pumping and other similar electrical equipment ui ment directly related to the operation of a swimming pool,each pool 49.50 3.Carnivals and Circuses Carnivals,circuses,or other traveling shows or exhibitions utilizing transportable-type rides,booths,displays and attractions. For electrical generators and electrically driven rides,each 23.50 For mechanically driven rides and walk-through attractions or displays having electric lighting,each 7.25 For a system of area and booth lighting,each 7.25 For permanently installed rides,booths,displays and attractions,use the Unit Fee Schedule. 4.Temporary Power Service Fortemporary a service pole or pedestal,including all pole or pedestal-mounted receptacle outlets and appurtenances,each 23.50 For a temporary distribution system and temporary lighting and receptacle outlets for construction sites,decorative lights, Christmas tree sales lots,fireworks stands,etc.,each 12.30 Unit Fee Schedule (Note: The following do not include permit-issuing fee.) 1. Receptacle,Switch and Light Outlets For receptacle,switch,light or other outlets at which current is used or controlled,except services,feeders and meters: . First 20 fixtures,each 1 10 0.10 Additional fixtures,each 73 Note: For multi outlet assemblies,each 5 feet(1524 mm)or fraction thereof may be considered as one outlet. 2.Lighting Fixtures For lighting fixtures,sockets or other lamp-holding devices: 1.10 First 20 fixtures,each 0.73 Additional fixtures,each 1.13 For pole or platform-mounted lighting fixtures,each 1.10 For theatrical-type lighting fixtures or assemblies,each 3.Residential Appliances For fixed residential appliances or receptacle outlets for same,including wall-mounted electric ovens; counter-mounted cooking tops;electric ranges;self-contained room,console or through-wall air conditioners;space heaters;food waste grinders; dishwashers;washing machines;water heaters;clothes dryers;or other motor-operated appliances not exceeding I 4.75 horsepower(HP)(746 W)in rating,each Note:For other types of air conditioners and other motor-driven appliances having larger electrical ratings,see Power Apparatus. 4.Nonresidential Appliances For nonresidential appliances and self-contained factory-wired,nonresidential appliances not exceeding 1 horsepower(HP), kilowatt(kW)or kilovolt-ampere(kVA),in rating,including medical and dental devices;food,beverage and ice cream cabinets; illuminated show cases; 4.75 drinkingfountains;vending machines; laundry machines;or other similar types of equipment,each Note:For other types of air conditioners and other motor-driven appliances having larger electrical ratings,see Power Apparatus. 5.Power Apparatus For motors,generators,transformers,rectifiers,synchronous converters,capacitors,industrial heating,air conditioners and heat pumps,cooking or baking equipment and other apparatus,as follows: Rating in horsepower(HP),kilowatts(kW),kilovolt-amperes(WA)or kilovolt-amperes-reactive(kVAR): 4.75 Up to and including 1,each 5 .3 12 Over 1 and not over 10,each 12 Over 10 and not over 50,each 4 .60 24.603 Over 50 and not over 100,each 44.50 Over 100,each Notes: 1. For equipment appliances having more than one motor,transformer,heater,etc.,the sum of the combined ratings may be used. or 2. These fees include all switches,circuit breakers,contactors,thermostats,relays and other directly related control equipment. Table 3-B '.Busways For trolley and plug-in-type busways,each 100 feet(30 480 mm)or fraction thereof 7.25 Note:An additional fee is required for lighting fixtures,motors and other appliances that are connected to trolley and plug-in-type busways.A fee is not required for portable tools. 7.Signs,Outline Lighting and Marquees For signs,outline lighting systems or marquees supplied from one branch circuit,each 24.60 For additional branch circuits within the same sign,outline lighting system or marquee,each 4.75 8.Services For services of 600 volts or less and not over 200 amperes in rating,each 30.50 For services of 600 volts or less and over 200 amperes to 1,000 amperes,each 62.15 For services over 600 volts or over 1,000 amperes in rating,each 124.30 9. Miscellaneous Apparatus,Conduits and Conductors For electrical apparatus,conduits and conductors for which a permit is required but for which no fee is herein set forth..18.20 Note:This fee is not applicable when a fee is paid for one or more services,outlets,fixtures,appliances,power apparatus, busways,signs or other equipment. Other Inspections and Fees: 1. Inspections outside of normal business hours,per hour(minimum charge-two hours) $49.50* 2. Reinspection fees assessed under provisions of Section 305.8,per inspection $49.50* 3. Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated,per hour(minimum charge-one-half hour) $49.50* 4. Additional plan review required by changes,additions or revisions to plans or to plans for which an initial review has been completed(minimum charge-one-half hour) $49.50* 5. ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES FOR ELECTRICAL WORK INCLUDED WITH A BUILDING PERMIT SHALL ASSESSED AT 10% OF THE BUILDING PERMIT FEE. *Or the total hourly cost to the jurisdiction,whichever is the greatest.This cost shall include supervision,overhead,equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of the employees involved. EXHIBIT D 1997 UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE TABLE 3-C:MECHANICAL PERMIT FEES Permit Issuance and Heaters $23.50 1. For the issuance of each mechanical permit 2.For issuing each supplemental permit for which the original permit has not expired,been canceled or finaled 7.25 Unit Fee Schedule (Note:The following do not include permit-issuing fee.) 1. Furnaces For the installation or relocation of each forced-air or gravity-type furnace or burner,including ducts and vents attached to such appliance,up to and including 100,000 Btu/h(29.3 kW) 14.80 For the installation or relocation of each forced-air or gravity-type furnace or burner,including ducts and vents attached to such appliance over 100,000 Btu/h(29.3 kW) 18.20 For the installation or relocation of each floor furnace,including vent 14.80 For the installation or relocation of each suspended heater,recessed wall heater or floor-mounted unit heater 14.80 2. Appliance Vents For the installation,relocation or replacement of each appliance vent installed and not included in an appliance permit 7.25 3. Repairs or Additions For the repair of,alteration of,or addition to each heating appliance,refrigeration unit,cooling unit,absorption unit,or each heating,cooling,absorption or evaporative cooling system,including installation of controls regulated by the Mechanical Code 13.70 4. Boilers,Compressors and Absorption Systems For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor to and including 3 horsepower(10.6 kW),or each absorption system to and including 100,000 Btu/b(29.3 kW) 14.70 For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor over 3 horsepower(10.6 kW)to and including 15 horsepower (52.7 kW),or each absorption system over 100,000 Btu/h(29.3 kW)to and including 500,000 Btu/h(146.6 kW) 27.15 For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor over 15 horsepower(52.7 kW)to and including 30 horsepower (105.5 kW),or each absorption system over 500,000 Btu/h(146.6 kW)to and including 1,000,000 Btu/h(293.1 kW) 37.25 For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor over 30 horsepower(105.5 kW)to and including 50 horsepower (176 kW),or each absorption system over 1,000,000 Btu/h(293.1 kW)to and including 1,750,000 Btu/h(512.9 kW) 55.45 For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor over 50 horsepower(176 kW),or each absorption system over 1,750,000 Btu/h(512.9 kW) 92.65 i. Air Handlers For each air-handling unit to and including 10,000 cubic feet per minute(cfm)(4719 L/s),including ducts attached thereto10.65 Note:This fee does not apply to an air-handling unit which is a portion of a factory-assembled appliance,cooling unit, evaporative cooler or absorption unit for which a permit is required elsewhere in the Mechanical Code. For each air-handling unit over 10,000 cfm(4719 L/s) 18.10 6. Evaporative Coolers For each evaporative cooler other than portable type 10.65 7.Ventilation and Exhaust For each ventilation fan connected to a single duct 7.25 For each ventilation system which is not a portion of any heating or air-conditioning system authorized by a permit 10.65 For the installation of each hood which is served by mechanical exhaust,including the ducts for such hood... 10.65 8. Incinerators For the installation or relocation of each domestic-type incinerator 18.20 For the installation or relocation of each commercial or industrial-type incinerator 14.50 9. Miscellaneous For each appliance or piece of equipment regulated by the Mechanical Code but not classed in other appliance categories,or for which the fee is listed in the table 10.65 Other Inspections and Fees: 1. Inspections outside of normal business hours,per hour(minimum charge-two hours) $49.50* 2. Reinspection fees assessed under provisions of Section 305.8,per inspection $49.50* 3.Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated,per hour(minimum charge--one-half hour) $49.50* 4.Additional plan review required by changes,additions or revisions to plans or to plans for which an initial review has been completed(minimum charge-one-half hour) $49.50* 5. MECHANICAL PERMIT FEES FOR MECHANICAL WORK INCLUDED WITH A BUILDING PERMIT SHALL ASSESSED AT 10% OF THE BUILDING PERMIT FEE. *Or the total hourly cost to the jurisdiction,whichever is the greatest.This cost shall include supervision,overhead,equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of the employees involved. EXHIBIT E 1997 UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE TABLE 3-D: PLUMBING PERMIT FEES Permit Issuance $23.50 1. For the issuance of each plumbing permit 2. For issuing supplemental each su lemental permit for which the original permit has not expired,been canceled or finaled 7.25 Unit Fee Schedule (Note: The following do not include permit-issuing fee.) 1.Fixtures and Vents plumbing fixture or trap or set of fixtures on one trap(including water,drainage piping and backflow protection thereof) For each p 9 9.80 For repair or alteration of drainage or vent piping,each fixture 4.75 2. Sewers,Disposal Systems and Interceptors 24.65 For each building sewer and each trailer park sewer For each cesspool 37.2534. 5 For each private sewage disposal system For each industrial waste pretreatment interceptor,including its trap and vent,excepting kitchen-type grease interceptors 90 functioning as fixture traps 19.90 Rainwater systems-per drain(inside building) 3.Water Piping and Water Heaters 4.75 For installation,alteration,or repair of water piping or water-treating equipment,or both,each 1 . 5 For each water heater including vent For vents only,see Table 3-C. 4.Gas Piping Systems 6.15 For each gas piping system of one to five outlets 1.10 For each additional outlet over five,each 5. Lawn Sprinklers,Vacuum Breakers and Backflow Protection Devices 14.80 For each lawn sprinkler system on any one meter,including backflow protection devices thereof For atmospheric-type vacuum breakers or backflow protection devices not included in Item 1: 12.30 1 to 5 devices 2.25 Over 5 devices,each For each backflow-protection device other than atmospheric-type vacuum breakers: 2 inches(50.8 mm)and smaller 12.30.3 Over 2 inches(50.8 mm) 5 6.Swimming Pools For each swimming pool or spa: 91.25 Public pool 60.75 Public spa 60.75 Private pool 30.25 Private spa 7.Miscellaneous For each appliance or piece of equipment regulated by the Plumbing Code but not classed in other appliance categories, or for which no other fee is listed in this code 9.80 Other Inspections and Fees: $49.50* 1.Inspections outside of normal business hours,per hour(minimum charge-two hours) $49.50* 2.Reinspection fees assessed under provisions of Section 305.8,per inspection 3p .Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated,per hour(minimum charge--one-half hour) $49.50* 4.Additional plan review required by changes,additions or revisions to plans or to plans for which an initial review has been completed(minimum charge-one-half hour) $49.50* p 6. PLUMBING PERMIT FEES FOR PLUMBING WORK INCLUDED WITH A BUILDING PERMIT SHALL ASSESSED AT 10% OF THE BUILDING PERMIT FEE. *Or the total hourly cost to the jurisdiction,whichever is the greatest.This cost shall include supervision,overhead,equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of the employees involved. 5. PLUMBING PERMIT FEES FOR PLUMBING WORK INCLUDED WITH A BUILDING PERMIT SHALL BE 10% OF THE BUILDING PERMIT FEE. of all ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions set forth SECTION Z. Repeal herein or any part of the code adopted herein by reference does not affect rights and duties that have p maturedor penalties enalties that were incurred and proceedings that were begun beforeservation of the peace, health and safetyof the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, an emergency is declared to exist, and this operative shall become immediatelyo erative and in force from and after the date of posting hereof. SECTION 3. That nothingin this ordinance or in the Codes hereby adopted shall be construed to affect anysuit or proceedingimpending in any court, or any rights acquired, or liability incurred, or any cause p or causes of action acquired or existing, under any act or ordinance hereby repealed as cited in Section 2 of this Y just gordinance; nor shall an or legal right or remedy of any character be lost, impaired or affected by this ordinance. PASSED AND ADOPTED bythe Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this 17Th day of APRIL,2002 APPROVED this 17TH day of APRIL, 2002 by the affirmative vote of three- fourths of the members of the Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona. Paul Loomis, Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Dan Dudley, Town Attorney { TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: April 17, 2002 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Bryant Nodine, AICP, Planning & Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING, ORDINANCE (0)Q2-13 , OV07-01-05, AMENDING CHAPTER 14, ARTICLE 14-2 ET SEQ. LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION AND BUFFER YARD PLANS AND ALL REFERENCE THERETO, CHAPTER 2 DEFINITIONS, AND ARTICLE 16-1 DESIGN GUIDELINES OF THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED. BACKGROUND: Theose u of this update is to simplify the code, clarify requirements, and address inadequate standards. p � p Staff worked with a Technical Advisory Committee to effect changes to the current Ordinance. The team included Oro Valleycitizens and industry professionals. Study sessions were held with the Planning and Zoning Commission on September 21, 2001 and October 2, 2001 to discuss the proposed amendments to the Landscape Code. On December 4, 2001, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the code amendment. The Town Council conducted a study session on January 28, 2002. Attached is a final draft of the code for consideration. SUMMARY: The six major categories of amendments proposed include; 1) Applicability, 2) Off-Street Parking, 3) g Screening Requirements,uirements, 4) Addendum A, Oro Valley Approved Plant List, and 5) Design Guidelines,and 6) Buffer Yards. A summary of each is provided in the following: Applicability The code amendment will apply to all new buildings, new uses of land including subdivisions and any additions to existing building square footage and uses in every zoning district. The only exception is that of individual lots in residential subdivisions. As currently written, the existing code allows for the waiver of Landscape, Irrigation and Buffer Yard Plan submittal for any proposed R1-20, R1-36, R1-43, and R1-144 subdivisions, at the discretion of the Planning and Zoning Administrator. This provision has not been used in the past five years. The amendment eliminates the waiver allowance. Of Street Parking Asp art of the amendment, landscape requirements associated with off-street parking were eliminated from the parking code and added to this code, Section 14-204. Staff also transferred the landscape requirements contained in the commercial code and added them to the amendment. However in doing so, staff realized that numerous overlaps, as well as discrepancies exist within the screening/landscape requirements contained in the three code sections. These overlaps and discrepancies were eliminated L i throughout this revision; thereby, further streamlining the amendment. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 70UNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 4 Buffer Yard Options Section 14-207 requires buffer yards between all incompatible zoning districts, as well as properties abutting perimeter streets/rights-of-ways. During the process of revising the buffer yard requirements, the applicable zone districts were realigned to ensure that like zone districts were grouped together. The districts were organized with regard to the following themes: 1. Abutting zoning districts of similar intensity do not need buffer yards. 2. When a zoning district abuts another of dissimilar intensity, then a buffer yard is required. ZONING DISTRICT GROUPINGS OF PROPOSED CODE R1-144, R1-72, R1-43, R1-36, R1-20 R1-10, R1-7, R-4, SDH-6 R-4R, R-6, R-S, P&OS, PS&C C-N, C-1, C-2, T-P, P-1 In addition, the buffer yard requirements have been simplified by reducing the number options of buffer yards from 27 (as rovided in the current code) to a total of seven. Those eliminated include options that p were five and 7.5 feet in width. The options as amended consist of the following: • Option A,which includes of a choice three minimum widths(10', 15' and 20') • Option B, which includes a choice of four minimum widths (15', 20', 30', 40'). The number of trees, shrubs and accents varies with each buffer yard width starting with the maximum amount of landscape that can be provided in the narrowest buffer option and reducing the required landscape as the buffer yard widths increase. This provides an incentive for wider buffer yards. The yard est buffer and in each option is designated as natural desert. However, the amendment includes a provision to require supplemental plant material in these areas to ensure effective buffering. The provision specifies that the "natural desert buffer areas" provide at least three trees and 15 shrubs per 100 linear feet. In addition, the provision requires that any landscape added to meet this requirement be ou ed to buffer existing uses and to minimize disturbance for planting and irrigation. Street frontage grouped buffer yards with varying widths have been provided for residential and commercial uses. Finally, the amendment provides that when the second property of two adjacent parcels is to develop, the second use is not required to provide screening over three feet high if screening has been provided by the first use. Thisp rovision eliminates the potential for two adjacent property line walls to create an"alley"or walled buffer yard. Ano opportunity to modify buffer yard requirements has been provided to the DRB in cases where conflicts pp y between the landscaping and traffic sight visibility, scenic views or other standards occur. Screening Requirements In Table 5 (14-208), Required Screening, Staff proposes screening, in addition to landscaping, where uses are clearly not compatible. The amendment provides that screening devices shall be masonry construction and/or earthen berm (3:1 slope) that provides an opaque screen, 5 feet in height. Because staff was concerned that such opaque screens may result in long, monotonous walls, a provision was also TOWN OF ORO VALLEY OU NCIL COMMUNICATION Page 3 of 4 included to ensure that all masonrywalls, greater than 40 feet in length shall be broken by using a combination of at least two of the following: 1) decorative caps, patterns, and variations in texture or pattern; use of swales, berms and landscaping; 3) undulations or offset areas; and 4) varied setbacks. 2) In addition, the amendment provides the Development Review Board the authority to lower/increase the height of the screeningdevice or to waive the screening requirement. This authority is provided to resolve situations where the buffer yard, topography or layout of the development does not require screening, adequately not ade uately screen surrounding properties or creates an unsafe, unusable landscape alley between two walls. Addendum A The proposed amendment includes a revised Addendum A, Oro Valley Approved Plant List. The list is featured in a table format, providingexpanded information on each plant such as; plant status (tree, shrub, accent, annual, p erennial, etc.), plant origin, approximate watering needs and hardiness. After the January study session, Staff consulted with two landscape firms, McGann & Associates and Novak Environmental, to improve the current list. The list is in two groups: Plant List A-1 This list includes only plants native to this area. In order to maintain our desert character, the new code specifies that one may only utilize plants from this list within buffer yards. Plant List A-2 This list includes hardy and drought-tolerant plants not indigenous to this area. Plants from this list may only be used internally within parking or courtyard areas etc. Design Guidelines Two landscape designguidelines have been added that would help promote water conservation and superior irrigation design. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staffapprovalproposed recommends of the changes to Landscape code sections as depicted in Exhibit 'A'. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 'OUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 4 of 4 SUGGESTED MOTIONS: I move to approve Ordinance No. (0)02-13 , adopting amendments as depicted in Exhibit 'A'. -or- I move to approve Ordinance No. (0)02-13 , adopting amendments as depicted in Exhibit 'A' with the following changes: -or- I move to deny Ordinance No. (0)Q2-13 , finding that ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ordinance No. (0)0 2-13 2. Exhibit A // .4,1; Plann'�� Zo *iie Administrator 741j 41Co nity Development Director W4 Town Manager F:\OV\OV7\2001\07-O1-OS\TC Rprt Jan.28 2002.doc { ORDINANCE NO. (0)02-13 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, PERTAINING TO AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 14, ARTICLE 14-2 ET SEQ. LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION AND BUFFER YARD PLANS AND ALL REFERENCE THERETO, CHAPTER 2 DEFINITIONS, AND ARTICLE 16-1 DESIGN GUIDELINES OF THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED THAT ESTABLISHES THESE AMENDMENTS AS PART OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED, AND FIXING THE EFFECTIVE DATE THEREOF; PRESERVING RIGHTS AND DUTIES THAT HAVE ALREADY BEEN ASSURED AND PROCEEDINGS THAT HAVE ALREADY BEGUN THEREUNDER. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY: SECTION 1. That Exhibit 'A' be added as specified to amend portions of Chapter 2, 14, and Article 16-1 of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised (OVZCR). SECTION 2. All ordinances and part of ordinances in conflict with provisions of this ordinance or any part of the amendments to the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised adopted herein by reference are hereby repealed on the effective date of this ordinance. SECTION 3. Repeal of all ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions set forth herein or any part of the amendments to the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised adopted herein byreference does not affect rights and duties that have matured or penalties that were incurred and proceedings that were begun before the effective date of the repeal. SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of the ordinance or anypart of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this 17th day of April, 2002. Paul H. Loomis, Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Dan L. Dudley, Town Attorney EXHIBIT A CHAPTER 2 DEFINITIONS ARTICLE 16-1 DESIGN GUIDELINES SECTION 16-103 C ARTICLE 14-2 LANDSCAPE,IRRIGATION AND BUFFER YARD PLANS PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED CHAPTER 2, DEFINITIONS RELATED TO ARTICLE 14-2 LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION AND BUFFER YARD PLANS ARTICLE 2-1 DEFINITIONS Sec. 2-1 01 Definitions BUFFER AREA: OPEN SPACES, LANDSCAPED AREAS, FENCES, WALLS, BERMS OR ANY COMBINATION THEREOF USED TO PHYSICALLY SEPARATE OR SCREEN ONE USE OR PROPERTY FROM ANOTHER. LANDSCAPED ISLAND: A LANDSCAPED AREA DEFINED BY A HEADER AND/OR CURB COMMONLY FOUND IN A PARKING LOT OR CUL-DE-SAC. LANDSCAPE: ANY COMBINATION OF TREES, SHRUBS, FLOWERS, OR OTHER HORTICULTURAL ELEMENTS, DECORATIVE STONEWORK, PAVING, SCREENING OR OTHER ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS, ALL OF WHICH ARE DESIGNED TO ENHANCE THE VISUAL AMENITY OF A PROPERTY AND/OR TO PROVIDE A SCREEN TO MITIGATE ANY OBJECTIONABLE ASPECTS THAT MAY DETRIMENTALLY AFFECT ADJACENT LAND. F:\OV\OV7\2001\07-01-05\Code Drafts\Article 14 040502.doc 04/08/2002 Page 2 AMENDMENTS TO ARTICLE 16-1 DESIGN GUIDELINES SECTION 16-103 C Insert the following: 16-103 C 3 Landscape Design c. Plants having similar water use should be grouped together in district hydrozones d. Plants should be selected appropriately based upon their adaptability to the climatic, geological and topographical conditions of the site. 16-103 C 7 To minimize water consumption,Hydrozone irrigation is recommended. h. For longevity, the use of PVC drip irrigation lines is encouraged instead of the more commonly used polytube to reduce clogging of emitters due to root intrusion or damage by rodents. i. Installation of master valves, flow sensors and automatic shutoffs is encouraged to minimize water loss due to main line breaks or leaks. F:\OV\OV7\2001\07-01-05\Code Drafts\Article 14 040503.doc 04/08/2002 Page 3 LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION,AND BUFFER YARD PLAN REQUIREMENTS Article 14-2. LANDSCAPE,IRRIGATION AND BUFFER YARD PLANS SECTION 14-201 Purpose Thep rovisions set forth in this Article are designed to provide standards for the installation of landscaping and irrigation, THE CONSERVATION OF GROUND WATER, site stabilization, p g g . revegetation and the provision of buffer yards on all development proj ects within Oro Valley so as g to promote the general welfare of the community. The preservation and protection of existing - • •• -- -- - . • •V. • •.• • .• . . • , . • - • • , • ; • -•-- :•• :•- •- • - . andscaping, buffer yards, walls and screens allow for the separation of incongruousincompatibleuses and for the buffering of activities. Landscaping, buffery ards walls and screens together help to effectuate privacy, logical development and enhancement of property value. These regulations serve ARE TO BE APPLIED to protect the public health, safety and general welfare by: A. LAND VALUES: 1. Preserving the existing desert landscape and creating an attractive appearance along public streets. 2. PRESERVING EXISTING VIEWS AND screening from view those uses which may be detrimental to adjacent property values. 3. Requiring ENCOURAGING preservation of native vegetation which is an integral part of the Sonoran Desert and which contributes to property values, high quality of life and the unique lifestyle which the community enjoys. • •r - • • - - •• • - • - • - •- • • -• - • . - •- • .• r . -- ..- - '- - • - • -. - G;13. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY: 1. Preserving native vegetation which is important in stabilizing desert soils and providing food and protection for many types of desert wildlife. 2. g Req uirin use of native vegetation, which is more drought-tolerant and requires less maintenance than other types of landscaping materials. 3. Contributing to the reduction of air pollution by encouraging the use of vegetation for air filtration and absorption of carbon dioxide and production of oxygen. F:\OV\OV7\2001\07-01-05\Code Drafts\Article 14 040502.doc 04/08/2002 Page 4 LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, AND BUFFER YARD PLAN REQUIREMENTS 4. ENCOURAGING THE PRESERVATION OF WILDLIFE HABITAT AND WILDLIFE FRIENDLY DESIGN THROUGH BETTER SITE DESIGN. C. WATER QUALITY AND CONSERVATION: 1. Reducing soil erosion by slowing storm runoff which increases infiltration. 2. RESTRICTING THE USE OF TURF TO WHERE IT IS APPROPRIATE AND NECESSARY. 3. ESTABLISHING TECHNIQUES FOR THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF LANDSCAPE MATERIALS. 4. IMPLEMENTING=LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION STANDARDS FOR TREES, CACTI, TURF GRASS AND SHRUBS WHICH MAY INCLUDE THE USE OF RAIN SENSORS AND WATER HARVESTING TECHNIQUES. D. AESTHETICS: 1. ENHANCING THE AESTHETIC QUALITIES OF EACH SITE AND USING LANDSCAPE TO REDUCE THE MASS OF BUILDINGS. 2. Reducing adverse impacts between potentially incompatible uses and zones by requiring an appropriate level of buffering and screening. 3. CONSIDERING EXISTING LANDSCAPING WITHIN 400 FEET OF THE PROJECT SITE TO PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN LANDSCAPE CONTINUITY WITHIN THE COM TY. D. HUMAN VALUES: 1. Protecting the right of property enjoyment through nuisance reduction. 2. Encouraging the use of non-pollen producing plants, thereby reducing the risks of airborne infection and respiratory disease. 3. PROVIDING DIRECT AND IMPORTANT PHYSICAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL BENEFITS TO HUMAN BEINGS THROUGH THE USE OF LANDSCAPING TO REDUCE GLARE, AND TO BREAK UP THE MONOTONY AND SOFTEN THE HARSHER ASPECTS OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, WHILE ADDRESSING SECURITY ISSUES RELATED TO LANDSCAPE DESIGN. ' - •-•• • - • • . - . -• •'. • •• • • --- - - -• -• - •- -: . - F:\OV\OV7\2001\07-01-05\Code Drafts\Article 14 040505.doc 04/08/2002 Page 5 LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, AND BUFFER YARD PLAN REQUIREMENTS E. Protecting the right of property enjoyment through nuisance reduction. infection and respiratory disease. -. •- • . - - ••. • •- ..-•• -- -- •• •• - -- . •• • • : • . : ••r •- •� • J. Promoting recognized xeriscape goals for water conservation using xeriscape principles in 1. Water conserving design, 2. Low water use/drought tolerant plants, 3. Minimum use of turf, 4. Appropriate irrigation methods, 5. Water conserving mulches, 6. Water harvesting techniques,and 7. Proper maintenance practices. SECTION 14-202 Applicability A. With the exception of individual lots in residential subdivisions, this Article shall apply to all p pro•ects where a development plan or plat is required in accordance with Chapter 4 of the J OVZCR. B. ANY DISTURBANCE REQUIRING A TYPE 3 GRADING PERMIT SHALL BE TREATED OR REVEGETATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 14-208 . .. . .. ._ rr • •.• •. - . i • • i • • • i i • • • I •. p 44 .. •. . .•• *- .. •_ .• - •. • . ._ . .•.. .. . .•. Director. This determination shall be made at the pre application conference. SECTION 14-203 APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS A. Landscape, Irrigation and Buffer Yard Plans shall accompany applications for DEVELOPMENT PLANS AND WILL BE REVIEWED BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD. LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION AND BUFFER YARD PLANS SHALL ACCOMPANY FINAL PLATS, use permits, and variances, where applicable, and will be reviewed by the Development Review Board in accordance with the provisions of Article 3- 3 and this Sec. 14-208 and 14-209 of this Code. F:\OV\OV7\2001\07-01-05\Code Drafts\Article 14 040506.doc 04/08/2002 Page 6 LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, AND BUFFER YARD PLAN REQUIREMENTS -• .- rr • •.. •• - • 1 - - .- •- ..-: • • •- - . -- • .•. •. •.- . - - . 1. - • i - ` . .• • •- ' • - - • •- • • $ -• -- - • : i• - • A." - I •- _ GB. Copies of the Landscape, Irrigation and Buffer Yard Plans and supporting data SHALL BE prepared in accordance with the requirements set forth in Sec. 14-204 through 14-206 of this Code. - ..• - -- . -•- . .• - •. .- 1. Copies Required: a. Copies of the Landscape, Irrigation and Buffer Yard Plans shall be reproduced in the form of blue line or black line prints on a white background. Scheduling of the Landscape Plan review by the Development Review Board will be dependent upon adequacy of data presented and completion of processing. b. 3-full-sizedTHE NUMBER OF copies of the Landscape, Irrigation and Buffer Yard Plans SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED ON THE "LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION AND BUFFER YARD APPLICATION FORM". ALL COPIES SHALL BE folded to 8-1/2" x 11" (approved County ORO VALLEY fold) AND most=i4e submitted for review. c. 10 calendar days prior to the Development Review Board meeting regarding the plan, 20 legible copies of the Landscape, Irrigation and Buffer Yard Plans, reduced to a size of 11" x 17", must be supplied for agenda packets. d. ONE DIGITAL COPY, ON ZIP DISK OR COMPACT DISK (CD FORMAT), OF THE LANDSCAPE , IRRIGATION AND BUFFER YARD PLAN SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE RESUBMITTAL FOR THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING. 2. For all resubmittals, THE previous review sheets and a copy of a response letter SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH THE RESUBMITTAL (if other than the first submittal). In addition to resolving review comments on plan sheets, revisions shall be summarized in letter form. 3. On all proposals involving State rights-of-way, copies of Arizona Department of Transportation approval letters shall be submitted to THE PLANNING AND ZONING ADMINISTRATOR Town Engineer five working days WITH THE RESUBMITTAL FOR prior to the scheduledTHE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD $ . =• - • --• -: MEETING on the plan. F:\OV\OV7\2001\07-01-05\Code Drafts\Article 14 040501.doc 04/08/2002 Page 7 LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, AND BUFFER YARD PLAN REQUIREMENTS B. A filingfee, as determined by a fee schedule adopted by the Town Council, to cover costs of examining and processing of Landscape, Irrigation and Buffer Yard Plans and field inspection related thereto, shall be paid by the applicant at the time of filing. SECTION 14-204 LANDSCAPE PLANS A. Plan Requirements 1. All Landscape, Irrigation and Buffer Yard plans shall be prepared and certified by a Registered Landscape Architect licensed to practice in the State of Arizona. Certification of Landscape, Irrigation and Buffer Yard plans, with seal, signature, printed name and registration number of the landscape architect shall be provided on EACH OF the Landscape, Irrigation and Buffer Yard drawings. •- -- : __•-: ; ___ 2. Plans must be drawn to a scale at which all necessary details are clearly shown (one inch equals forty feet is preferred) on sheets measuring 24" x 36". Scale to be the same for all sheets. A larger sheet size or smaller DIFFERENT scale may be approved by THE Town Engineer or Planning and Zoning Director ADMINISTRATOR. 3. Show north arrow. Every effort should be made to have north oriented toward the top of the sheet. Some slight rotation may be made to accommodate long narrow parcels, convenient match lines, etc., but in no case will the north arrow point downward. (In the case of multiple sheets, the north orientation will be the same on all sheets). 4. In the lower right corner of each sheet, where it will be visible when folded, provide a title block which includes: a. Name of subdivision or development. b. "Lots through and Common Areas a through ". c. Brief legal description, i.e. "Portion of Section , T S, R E, G&SRB&M, Town of Oro Valley, Pima County, Arizona". F:\OV\OV7\2001\07-01-05\Code Drafts\Article 14 04050a.doc 04/08/2002 Page 8 LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, AND BUFFER YARD PLAN REQUIREMENTS d. Scale. Landscape, Irrigation and Buffer Plans to be shown at a 1 inch equals 20 feet, or 1 inch equals 3-0 feet and, in no case shall it be smaller than 1 inch equals-40-feet, e. Contour interval. f. Date (revised plans should show dates of revision(s)). 5. Show sight visibility triangles at intersection of all roads, both public and private. REFER TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY SUBDIVISION STREET STANDARDS FOR INFORMATION PERTAINING TO SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLES. SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLES SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE TOWN ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLAN REVIEW BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD. All shrubbery, hedges and other plantings street-tine level at the intersecting streets. B. Plan Content: Landscape, Irrigation and Buffer Yard Plans shall indicate the location of existing and proposed buildings, parking areas, street improvements, locations and types of landscaped areas, TRAILS AND RECREATION AREAS, complete irrigation and revegetation plans, buffer yards, walls and screens and proposed lot layout. Additional information to be shown on the Landscape, Irrigation and Buffer Yard Plans shall include, but not be limited to: 1. Materials: Natural desert is an acceptable form of landscaping. Live plants, from the a. The applicant must submit a fact sheet with each landscape plan for all plants not found on the Town's list of approved plants (see Addendum "A"). The fact sheet PRIVIDE INFORMATION SO THAT The Planning and Zoning Director ADMINISTRATOR may reject any plants with a high incidence of pollen related allergy problems, high water use, fire hazard or noxious seed preductionINVASIVE CHARACTERISTICS. b. A specific schedule of all trees, shrubs and groundcover identified by common and botanical name, and the quantity and size of each plant to be included on the plans, as well as a list of cool and warm season seed mixes to be used for revegetation, if applicable. The planting seed mixes listed in Addendum "B" are required for all F:\OV\OV7\2001\07-01-05\Code Drafts\Article 14 040502.doc 04/08/2002 Page 9 LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, AND BUFFER YARD PLAN REQUIREMENTS revegetation projects in Oro V ailey. The plants listed in Addendum "C" are prohibited from use in Oro Valley(all the above mentioned addenda are located at the end of Article 14 2). 2. THE proposed location of all UNDISTURBED NATURAL AREAS, EXISTING PLANTS THAT ARE TO BE RETAINED IN-PLACE, new PLANTS TO BE PLANTED and salvaged plant materials TO BE RELOCATED ON-SITE, SHALL BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED. 3. THE proposed treatment of all ground surfaces SHALL BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED. 4. Irrigation and/or watering plans ---- =-= -- -••-•" • -' • '=• = = -- ' -r 5. Elevations and layout of all proposed entry features (monument walls, etc.), INCLUDING DIMENSIONS AND LOCATION OF EACH ENTRY FEATURE. 6. Landscape design to minimize sand and gravel being carried into the streets by storm water or other runoff. 76. Proposed types and methods of slope stabilization and their specific location. 7. Legend. 8. General notes SHALL INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: a. GROSS ACRES OF THE PROPERTY b. TOTAL ACRES OF GRADED SITE c. TOTAL ACRES OF OPEN SPACE REQUIRED d. TOTAL ACRES OF OPEN SPACE PROVIDED e. TOTAL ACRES OF UNDISTURBED NATURAL AREAS f. ZONING OF THE PROPERTY g. ZONING OF EACH ADJACENT PROPERTY h. BUILDING SETBACKS REQUIRED ALONG EACH PERIMETER PROPERTY LINE i. TYPE AND WIDTH OF EACH BUFFER YARD ON THE PROPERTY j. TYPE AND WIDTH OF BUFFER YARDS LOCATED ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES k. CLASSIFICATION OF EACH PUBLIC PERIMETER STREET ABUTTING THE PROPERTY AND THE TYPE AND WIDTH OF STREET BUFFER YARDS PROVIDED F:\OV\OV7\2001\07-01-05\Code Drafts\Article 14 04050-2Qdoc 04/08/2002 Page 10 LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, AND BUFFER YARD PLAN REQUIREMENTS 1. THAT THE PROPERTY OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM AS LONG AS NECESSARY IN ORDER TO TRANSITION PLANTS OVER TO NATURAL SOURCES. ANY PLANT MATERIALS THAT DIE FOR ANY REASON, SHALL BE REPLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 4-211, MAINTENANCE. m. THAT THE PROPERTY OWNER SHALL MAINTAIN ALL PLANTS WITHIN THE BUFFER YARDS TO ENSURE UNOBSTRUCTED VISIBILITY TO MOTORISTS. ALL SHRUBS, ACCENTS, AND GROUNDCOVERS SHALL NOT EXCEED 2 FEET IN HEIGHT. TREES WILL BE MAINTAINED TO ENSURE THAT BRANCHES/CANOPY FOILAGE IS NOT BELOW A HEIGHT OF 6 FEET. 10. Topography- show existing contours at 1 foot intervals labeled frequently. 2 foot or 5 foot intervals may be used in special cases with approval of the Planning and Zoning Director ADMINISTRATOR. A sufficient number of spot elevations shall be shown to clearly describe the finished grading. 11. Revegetation of the site, in the event of abandonment, must be addressed in the form of a separate plan sheet or note on the landscape plan. Said plan, or note, must address the total area to be graded, including area of created slopes, which will require stabilization. 14-205 LANDSCAPE STANDARDS A. GENERAL STANDARDS 1. Any part of the development site which has been disturbed and is not required for buildings, structures, private residential yards, loading and vehicular access ways, streets, parking and utility areas, pedestrian walks and hard-surfaced activity areas shall be landscaped. 2. NATURAL DESERT IS AN ACCEPTABLE FORM OF LANDSCAPE. LIVE PLANTS, FROM THE APPROVED PLANT LIST, WALKWAYS, FOUNTAINS, SCULPTURE, ROCK GROUPINGS AND ORGANIC AND INORGANIC GROUNDCOVERS MAY BE USED AS AN ALTERNATIVE. WATER, AGGREGATE AND ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES SHALL NOT BE USED EXCLUSIVE OF LIVING PLANTS. 3. THE PLANTS LISTED IN ADDENDUM "A" ARE RECOMMENDED FOR USE IN ORO VALLEY. THE PLANTING SEED MIXES LISTED IN ADDENDUM "B" ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL REVEGETATION PROJECTS IN ORO VALLEY. THE PLANTS LISTED IN ADDENDUM "C" ARE PROHIBITED FROM USE IN ORO VALLEY (ALL THE ABOVE-MENTIONED ADDENDA ARE LOCATED AT THE END OF ARTICLE 14-2). F:\OV\OV7\2001\07-01-05\Code Drafts\Article 14 04050-2ldoc 04/08/2002 Page 11 LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, AND BUFFER YARD PLAN REQUIREMENTS 4. Native plants salvaged from the site shall be transplanted into common area, landscaped areas or front yards (as described in Sec. 14-205C, 8). WHENEVER FEASIBLE, PLANT SALVAGE SHALL INCLUDE IMMEDIATELY TRANSPLANTING SALVAGED PLANTS IN A PERMANENT LOCATION AS INDICATED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. IMMEDIATE TRANSPLANT IS PREFERRED TO PLACING SALVAGE PLANTS IN A HOLDING NURSERY FOR FUTURE RELOCATION ON SITE. 5. Unless otherwise specified herein, all required trees shall be a minimum of fifteen(15) gallons in size and at least 40 percent of those trees must be twenty-four (24) inch boxed, or twenty-four (24) inch spaded, or larger size. All shrubs AND ACCENT PLANTS shall be a minimum of five (5) gallon in size. ALL GROUNDCOVER PLANTS SHALL BE A MINIMUM ONE (1) GALLON IN SIZE. All plant material shall meet the minimum standards contained in the current editions of the Arizona Nursery Association's Growers Committee Recommended Tree Specifications and the American Association of Nurserymen as to size, condition and appearance. 6. All landscaped areas shall be finished with a natural topping material which may include, but is not limited to, the following: turf, groundcover planting, HYDROSEED, OR A MULCH (ORGANIC OR INORGANIC) OF AT LEAST TWO INCHES IN DEPTH. SHRUBS OR OTHER VEGETATIVE GROUNDCOVER MUST PLANTED TO COVER AT LEAST 80% OF THE AREA WITHIN TWO YEARS OF INSTALLATION. 7. For all proposed subdivisions where front yards are to be graded, one of the following options shall be incorporated: a. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE A MINIMUM OF 1 TREE, PLACED IN THE FRONT YARD THAT HAS BEEN SALVAGED FROM THE SITE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED SALVAGE PLAN. b. TWO NURSERY TREES, A MINIMUM OF 15 GALLON SIZE, SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR EACH FRONT YARD. 8. In all subdivisions where sidewalks are required, a low maintenance, landscaped curbway shall be incorporated into the landscape design. A curbway shall be defined as that area between the back of curb and the sidewalk of any public or private street. 9. Additional landscaping in street rights-of-way required MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE TOWN and shall be subject to acceptance and issuance of a permit from the Town Engineer, or in the case of Oracle and Tangerine RoadsWHERE APPROPRIATE, from the Arizona Department of Transportation. WHERE AGGREGATE GROUND COVER IS USED AS PART OF THE LANDSCAPE TREATMENT ALONG A STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE TOWN MAY REQUIRE THAT THE AGGREGATE GROUND COVER BE EXTENDED INTO F:\OV\OV7\2001\07-01-05\Code Drafts\Article 14 04050Sdoc 04/08/2002 Page 12 LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION AND BUFFER YARD PLAN REQUIREMENTS THE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY, TO THE EDGE OF THE STREET PAVEMENT OR CURB. 10. LANDSCAPE APE MATERIALS SHALL NOT OBSTRUCT SIGHT DISTANCES OR VEHICLE TURNING MOVEMENTS. 11. LANDSCAPED AREAS THAT ARE SUSCEPTIBLE TO INJURY BY PEDESTRIAN OR AUTO TRAFFIC SHALL BE PROTECTED BY APPROPRIATE CURBS, TREE GUARDS OR OTHER DEVICES. be added to the landscapeplan, which states that the property owner is A note shall . . plants over to natural sources. Any plant materials that die in transition, for any reason,shall be replaced in accordance with Sec. 4 212, Maintenance. 12. LANDSCAPE SHALL BE DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE SAND AND GRAVEL BEING CARRIED INTO THE STREETS BY STORM WATER OR OTHER RUNOFF. and large shrubs shall be adequately supported when planted. No trees shall 13. Treesg be planted interfere overhead service wires if their mature heights will with those wires. WHEN ADJACENT TO DEVELOPED RESIDENTIAL USES, THE ENTIRE 14. PERIMETER LANDSCAPE AND SCREENING ALONG THESE PROPERTY LINES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE FIRST PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT. 15. Earth berms shall have adequate plant material or groundcover treatment to prevent erosion. 16. Turf shall not exceed 15% of the total landscaped area, EXCEPT IN PARKS AND RECREATION AREAS. UNDER OUTDOOR LIGHTING TREES SHALL NOT BE PLANTED 17. STRUCTURES. LANDSCAPE PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE ARRANGED IN A MANNER NOT TO OBSTRUCT SECURITY LIGHTING. 18. IRRIGATION AND/OR WATERING PLANS SHALL MEET THE MINIMUM STANDARDS OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF IRRIGATION CONSULTANTS. B. OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING STANDARDS 1. EVERY SIXTH ROW OF PARKING SPACES SHALL BE SEPARATED BY A LANDSCAPED ISLAND MEASURING A MINIMUM TEN (10') FEET WIDE (INSIDE OF CURB TO INSIDE OF CURB) RUNNING THE LENGTH OF THE PARKING ROW. PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS, 4 FEET IN WIDTH, SHALL BE F:\OV\OV7\2001\07-01-05\Code V\OV7\2001\07-01-05\Code Drafts\Article 14 0405023°10c 04/08/2002 Page 13 LANDSCAPE,IRRIGATION, AND BUFFER YARD PLAN REQUIREMENTS PROVIDED INSIDE THE CURB, RUNNING THE LENGTH OF THE PARKING ROW AND MEANDERING AROUND THE TREES. THE ISLAND SHALL INCLUDE ONE CANOPY TREE FOR EVERY SIX (6) PARKING SPACES ABUTTING THE ISLAND. 2. ONE CANOPY TREE SHALL BE PLANTED IN EACH RAISED ISLAND. 3. LOADING AREAS SHALL BE SCREENED FROM ADJOINING PROPERTIES AND PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES WITH A MINIMUM FIVE (5) FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPED AREA AND A SIX (6) FOOT HIGH OPAQUE SCREEN, CONSISTING OF A DECORATIVE WALL, EARTH BERMS, VEGETATION OR A COMBINATION OF SUCH ELEMENTS. VEHICLULAR AND PEDESTRAIN ACCESS IS ALLOWED WITHIN THESE LANDSCAPED AREAS. C. ADDITIONAL STANDARDS FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL USES: 1. DRIVE-THROUGH WINDOWS AND WAITING/STACKING LANES SHALL BE SCREENED WITH A 5 FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPE SCREEN. THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE LANDSCAPE SCREEN SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 3 FEET IN HEIGHT. THE SCREEN SHALL BE LOCATED ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE DRIVE-THROUGH LANE AND SHALL SCREEN QUEUING AUTOMOBILES FROM ANY ADJACENT USE. 2. WHEN LOCATED IN A LARGER CENTER, THE LANDSCAPING OF THE PAD BUILDING SHALL BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE LANDSCAPING OF THE MAIN CENTER. 3. WHEN LOCATED IN A LARGER CENTER, CLEARLY IDENTIFIABLE LANDSCAPED PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS SHALL BE INSTALLED CONNECTING THE PAD BUILDINGS TO PARKNG AREAS AND THE LARGER COMMERCIAL CENTER. 4. ALL BUILDINGS, WHETHER FREESTANDING OR PART OF A LARGER C ENTER, SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM TEN-FOOT LANDSCAPED AREA ON ALL FOUR SIDES OF THE BUILDING. WALKWAYS, SIDEWALKS OR PATIOS MAY BE INCLUDED IN THE TEN-FOOT LANDSCAPED AREA PROVIDED THAT THE PLANTING AREA IS AT LEAST FOUR FEET WIDE EXCEPT WHERE REQUIRED FOR ACCESS. IF THE BUILDING HAS A LOADING ZONE, DRIVE-THROUGH WINDOW, AND/OR WAITING OR STACKING LANES, THEN THE FIVE-FOOT LANDSCAPED SCREEN REQUIRED ABOVE MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR THE LANDSCAPED AREA ALONG THE CORRESPONDING SIDE OF THE BUILDING. 5. LANDSCAPED SCREENING AROUND AUTOMATIC TELLER MACHINES (ATM'S) OR WEEKEND DEPOSIT BOXES AND RESTROOMS SHALL BE F:\OV\OV7\2001\07-01-05\Code Drafts\Article 14 04050-2cdoc 04/08/2002 Page 14 . LANDSCAPE,IRRIGATION, AND BUFFER YARD PLAN REQUIREMENTS PLACED SO AS TO MAXIMIZE OUTSIDE VISIBILITY OF THE ATM, DEPOSIT BOX. AND RESTROOMS. 14-206 IRRIGATION STANDARDS Provision shall be made for an approved method of underground automatic irrigation to all landscaped areas containing livingplant materials unless xerophytic plants are used. METHODS OF IRRIGATION MUST BE PROVIDED IN THE FOLLOWING MANNER: A. DRIP IRRIGATION OR LOW FLOW BUBBLERS ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL LANDSCAPE PLANTINGS EXCEPT TURF. ALL DRIP AND SPRINKLER SYSTEMS MUST BE EQUIPPED WITH SELF-TIMING DEVICES. B. IF DESERT LANDSCAPING IS USED WHICH WILL ULTIMATELY RELY ON NATURAL WATER SOURCES, A TEMPORARY DRIP IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE EMPLOYED UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THE PLANT MATERIALS ARE SUSTAINED BY NATURAL WATER SOURCES. ALL IRRIGATION SYSTEMS CONNECTED TO POTABLE WATER MAINS (PUBLIC OR PRIVATE) SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH BACKFLOW PREVENTORS. C. STORM WATER AND RUNOFF HARVESTING MUST BE UTILIZED TO SUPPLEMENT A PORTION OF THE LANDSCAPED AREA AND TO SUPPLEMENT DRIP IRRIGATION FOR BOTH NEW PLANTINGS AND PRESERVED VEGETATION. D. IRRIGATION WATER SHALL NOT LEAVE THE LANDSCAPED AREAS AND FLOW ONTO ROADS OR SIDEWALKS. E. SPRINKLER HEADS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT LEAST EIGHT INCHES AWAY FROM IMPERMEABLE SURFACES (E.G., SIDEWALKS, BUILDINGS, WALLS, ETC.). F. ORNAMENTAL WATER FEATURES, SUCH AS FOUNTAINS MAY BE USED IF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS ARE MET: 1. THE FEATURE IS LOCATED WITHIN A SHADED COURTYARD OR ENCLOSED SPACE; 2. WATER IN MOVING WATER FEATURES IS RECYCLED THROUGH THE FEATURE; AND, 3. THE WATER FEATURE IS DESIGNED TO PREVENT WATER SEEPAGE OR LEAKING. SECTION 14-207 Buffer Yards F:\OV\OV7\2001\07-01-05\Code Drafts\Article 14 04050-5doc 04/08/2002 Page 15 LANDSCAPE, IRRICATION, AND BUFFER YARD PLAN REQUIREMENTS A. Buffer Yard Plan Requirements: 1. - - • • •. : &.- -- • • . • . -: .. S ' • • are intended to visually --- - - - '- • --. • -. -: land use and a public street. A BUFFER YARD CONSISTS OF HORIZONTAL SPACE (LAND) AND VERTICAL ELEMENTS (PLANTS, BERMS, FENCES, OR WALLS). THE PURPOSE OF BUFFER YARDS IS TO PHYSICALLY SEPARATE AND VISUALLY SCREEN ADJACENT LAND USES. of bufferyards: Buffer yards shall be located on the outer perimeter of a let 2. Location or parcel PARCEL OF LAND, extending to the lot or parcel boundary line ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY LINES. BUFFER YARDS SHALL BE LOCATED IN COMMON AREAS; NOT IN INDIVIDUAL LOTS. 3. WHEN BUFFER YARDS OCCUR ADJACENT TO EACH OTHER (I.E: ALONG THE PROPERTY LINES OF TWO ADJACENT PROPERTIES) THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MAY REQUIRE A PEDESTRIAN TRAIL RUNNING THROUGH THE BUFFER YARD(S)1. THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MAY ALSO REQUIRE A MINIMUM TWENTY (20') FOOT WIDE CORRIDOR THAT PROVIDES PEDESTRIAN INGRESS/EGRESS BETWEEN THE TWO PROPERTIES FROM THE ADJOINING BUFFER YARDS. 4. Buffer Yards shall not be located on any portion of an existing or dedicated public or private street or righwa t-of- , unless specifically permitted by zoning, or approved by y the Town Engineer. 5. Determination of buffer yard requirements: a. BUFFER YARDS FOR ALL ZONING DISTRICTS SHALL BE PROVIDED AS SPECIFIED IN TABLE 1, BELOW. b. BUFFER YARDS BETWEEN DISTRICTS ARE NOT REQUIRED WHERE THE BOUNDARY BETWEEN THE DISTRICTS IS A STREET. c. BUFFER YARDS ARE NOT REQUIRED WITHIN A P&OS DISTRICT FOR ANY AREAS LEFT AS NATURAL OPEN SPACE. d. WHERE A DEVELOPMENT ABUTS A PUBLIC STREET, BUFFER YARDS SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG ALL PERIMETER STREET FRONTAGES AS PROVIDED IN TABLE 2, BELOW. e. PERIMETER STREET BUFFER YARDS ARE NOT REQUIRED WHERE HOMES FRONT ON THE PERIMETER STREET. F:\OV\OV7\2001\07-01-05\Code Drafts\Article 14 04050•)doc 04/08/2002 Page 16 LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, AND BUFFER YARD PLAN REQUIREMENTS f. MODIFICATION TO THE BUFFER YARD REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE MADE, AT THE DISCRETION RETION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, WHERE CONFLICTS WITH SIGHT VISIBILITY, SCENIC VIEWS OR OTHER STANDARDS AND CODE REQUIREMENTS OCCUR. between a parcel and a street, the following procedure shall be followed: 1) Identify the zoningdistrict or the zoning district equivalent of the use in Addenda D and E, "Required Buffer Yards" and proposed - 2) Identify zoning theof the land adjacent to the proposed use in Addendum D: 3)--Detemgine the buffer yard required on each boundary ter segment -- .;•- :• by referring the indicated letter from • • -. •. A ..-. • .. _ -- - cross section, constitute the buffer yard required between the two adjacent land uses. : .• ---- :. fering between the adjacent land uses. TABLE 1: REQUIRED BUFFER YARDS ZONING DISTRICT ZONING DISTRICT OF ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT SITE OF PROPOSED _ _ R-4R, R-6, R-S, C-N, C-1, C-2, ENT R1-144,R1-72, Rl R1-10, Rl 7, DEVELOPMENT 43, R1-36, R1-20 R-4, SDH-6 P&OS, PS&C T-P, P-1 R1-144, R1-72, R1-43, NO BUFFER NO BUFFER NO BUFFER NO BUFFER R1-36,R1-20 R1-10, R1-7, R-4, A NO BUFFER NO BUFFER NO BUFFER SDH-6 R-4R, R-6, R-S, B B A NO BUFFER P&OS, PS&C C-N, C-1, C-2, T-P, P- B B B NO BUFFER 1 F:\ov\ov7\2001\07-01-05\Code Drafts\Article 14 0405 -Vdoc 04/08/2002 Page 17 LANDSCAPE,IRRIGATION, AND BUFFER YARD PLAN REQUIREMENTS TABLE 2A: REQUIRED PERIMETER STREET FRONTAGE BUFFER YARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL USES PERIMETER ARTERIAL COLLECTOR RESIDENTIAL _ STREET TYPE STREET FRONTAGE B (25' min A (15' min) A (15' min) BUFFER YARD TABLE 2B: REQUIRED PERIMETER STREET FRONTAGE BUFFER YARDS FOR COMMERCIAL USES PERIMETER ARTERIAL COLLECTOR RESIDENTIAL STREET TYPE STREET FRONTAGE B (30' min B (30' min) B (30' min) BUFFER YARD 6. BUFFER YARDS "A"AND "B"ARE DEFINED IN THE FOLLOWING TABLES TABLE 3: REQUIRED PLANTINGS FOR BUFFER YARD "A" MINIMUM WIDTH 10' 15' 20' 5 TREES 4 TREES PLANTS PER 100NAT URAL 5 SHRUBS 4 SHRUBS DESERT LINEAL FEET 10 ACCENTS 8 ACCENTS TABLE 4: REQUIRED PLANTINGS FOR BUFFER YARD "B" MINIMUM WIDTH 15' 20' 30' 40' 8 TREES 7 TREES 5 TREES NATURAL PLANTS PER 100 8 SHRUBS 7 SHRUBS 5 SHRUBS FEET DESERT LINEAL 15 ACCENTS 12 ACCENTS 10 ACCENTS 7. ACCENTS IN TABLE 3 AND TABLE 4 INCLUDES FLOWERS AND VINES. 8. THE NATURAL DESERT BUFFER AREAS MUST PROVIDE AT LEAST 3 TREES AND 15 SHRUBS PER 100 LINEAL FEET. ANY LANDSCAPE ADDED TO MEET THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL BE GROUPED TO BUFFER EXISTING USES AND TO MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE FOR PLANTING AND IRRIGATION. F:\OV\OV7\2001\07-01-05\Code Drafts\Article 14 0405O- doc 04/08/2002 Page 18 LANDSCAPE,IRRIGATION, AND BUFFER YARD PLAN REQUIREMENTS B. Responsibility for Buffer Yard: on 1. When a use is the first to developtwo adjacent vacant parcels, the first use shall J provide the required buffer,based on existing zoning. 2. THE SECOND PROPERTY OWNER MAY DEVELOP A FULL BUFFER YARD IN TABLE 1, REQUIRED BUFFER YARDS, OR MAY AS SPECIFIED Q SUPPLEMENT THE REQUIREMENTS BY USING ELEMENTS OF THE EXISTING, ABUTTING PROPERTY BUFFER YARD AS DESCRIBED BELOW. a. DEDUCT THE WIDTH OF THE EXISTING BUFFER YARD FROM THE REQUIRED BUFFER YARD WIDTH SPECIFIED IN TABLE 1. THE REMAINING WIDTH IS THE AMOUNT OF LAND TO BE PROVIDED BY THE SECOND PROPERTY OWNER TO MEET THE BUFFER YARD REQUIREMENTS. b. DEDUCT THE NUMBER OF PLANTS FROM THE EXISTING BUFFER YARD FROM THE NUMBER SPECIFIED FOR THE REQUIRED BUFFER YARD IN TABLE 1. THE REMAINNG NUMBER OF PLANTS SHALL BE PROVIDED ON THE SECOND PROPERTY TO MEET THE BUFFER YARD REQUIREMENTS. c. THE SECOND PROPERTY OWNER SHALL DESIGN THE REQUIRED BUFFER YARD TO BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE EXISTING BUFFER YARD. D.C. Use of Buffer Yards: 1. INDIVIDUAL OR COMBINED Buffer Yards of Q 25-foot width, or wider, may be usedpassive for recreation. They may contain sculpture, benches, and pedestrian, bike or equestrian trails,provided that: a. For natural desert buffer yards, disturbance of existing plants shall be kept to a minimum, any disturbed areas shall be revegetated and specimen trees relocated within the buffer yard; b. For constructed buffer yards, no plant material shall be eliminated. c. All other regulations of this Article are met. 2. In no event, shall the following uses be permitted in buffer yards: a. Playfields, b. Stables, c. Swimming pools, d. Racquetball and tennis courts, e. Other active, structured recreational uses, f. Parking lots, g. Circulation drives EXCEPT AT REQUIRED ACCESS POINTS. F:\ov\Ov7\2001\07-01-05\Code Drafts\Article 14 04050- doc 04/08/2002 Page 19 LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, AND BUFFER YARD PLAN REQUIREMENTS eA s D e . _ ... A A., SA SECTION 14-208 SCREENING REGULATIONS: A. SCREENING DEVICES SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING TABLE: TABLE 5: REQUIRED SCREENING DISTRICT OF ZONING DISTRICT OF ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT SITE PROPOSED R1-144 R1-72, R1- R1-10, R1-7, R-4R, R-6, R-S, C-N, C-1, C-2, DEVELOPMENT 43,R1-36, R1-20 R-4, SDH-6 P&OS, PS&C T-P, P-1 R1-144,R1-72,R1-43, NO NO NO NO R1-36,R1-20 _ _ R1-10, R1-7,R 4, SDH-6 YES NO NO NO R-4R, R-6, R-S, P&OS, YES NO NO NO PS&C P1 YES YES YES NO C-N, C_1, C-2, T-P, - _ B. THE REQUIREMENT FOR A SCREEN MAY BE WAIVED OR THE HEIGHT LOWERED BY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD IF THE BUFFER YARD, TOPOGRAPHY OR LAYOUT OF DEVELOPMENT SCREENS SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, OR IF IT WOULD CREATE AN UNSAFE, UNUSABLE LANDSCAPED ALLEY BETWEEN TWO WALLS. C. THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MAY INCREASE THE NUMBER OF PLANTINGS AND THE HEIGHT OF A WALL, UP TO SIX FEET HIGH, IF THE BUFFER YARD, TOPOGRAPHY OR LAYOUT OF THE DEVELOPMENT DOES NOT ADEQUATELY SCREEN SURROUNDING PROPERTIES. D. SCREENING DEVICES REQUIRED BY THIS ARTICLE SHALL BE MASONRY (OR SIMILAR) CONSTRUCTION, EARTHEN BERM (3:1 SLOPE), AND/OR VEGETATION TO PROVIDE AN OPAQUE SCREEN. D WALLS, GREATER THAN 40 FEET IN LENGTH SHALL BROKEN BY E. SOLI USING AT LEAST TWO OF THE FOLLOWING TECHNIQUES: ORATIVE FEATURES SUCH AS CAPS, PATTERNS, AND VARIATIONS IN a. DEC TEXTURE OR MATERIALS. b. USE OF SWALES, BERMS AND LANDSCAPING F:\ov\ov7\2001\07-01-05\Code Drafts\Article 14 0405ndoc 04/08/2002 Page 20 LANDSCAPE,IRRIGATION, AND BUFFER YARD PLAN REQUIREMENTS c. UNDULATIONS OR OFFSET AREAS d. VARIED SETBACKS F. ALL REQUIRED SCREENING DEVICES SHALL BE ARCHITECTURALLY COMPATIBLE WITH THE MATERIALS AND DESIGN OF THE BULDINGS ON THE SITE. G. IF A WALL IS USED, VEGETATION SHALL BE REQUIRED AND MAINTAINED ON THE EXTERNAL SIDE OF THE BARRIER TO PROVIDE VISUAL RELIEF WHEN VIEWED FROM THE PROPERTY BEING BUFFERED. FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT THE WALL SHALL BE ON THE PROPERTY LINE WALL OF THE LOTS AND ALL OF THE VEGETATION BUFFER SHALL BE OUTSIDE THE WALL. H. BREAKS IN SCREENS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING ADMINISTRATOR TO PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE ACCESS BETWEEN RESIDENTIAL AREAS AND COMMERCIAL/SERVICE USES, PARTICULARLY IF THESE USES ARE LOCAL AND SERVE THE ADJOINING NEIGHBORHOOD. I. PARKING FACILITIES AND/OR INTERNAL DRIVES WHICH ABUT A PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY F-WAY OR WHERE LIGHTS MAY SHINE ON ADJACENT RESIDENCES SHALL PROVIDE A MINIMUM THREE AND ONE-HALF (3 1/2') FOOT HIGH DECORATIVE MASONRY WALL AND/OR THREE AND ONE-HALF (3 1/2') FOOT HIGH LANDSCAPED EARTH BERM, DEPRESSED PARKING OR, COMBINATION THEREOF. L. ALL REFUSE AREAS SHALL BE SCREENED ON THREE SIDES WITH A 6 FOOT MASONRY WALL AND PLANTINGS AND SHALL BE FINISHED TO MATCH THE ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTER OF THE PROJECT. FURTHERMORE, A SELF- CLOSING, SELF-LATCHING OPAQUE GATE, ALSO FINISHED TO MATCH THE ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTER OF THE PROJECT, SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE FOURTH SIDE OF THE ENCLOSURE. E. AMENITY LANDSCAPING: (PROPOSED SECTION) B. fa.wi+4430041444=g8* area � An l to at least fifteen percent of the gross parking arca shall be devoted to F:\OV\OV7\2001\07-01-05\Code Drafts\Article 14 04052doc 04/08/2002 Page 21 . LANDSCAPE,IRRIGATION,AND BUFFER YARD PLAN REQUIREMENTS 4440Wrllir03v1 nit�• • - • _ .- concrete, exposed aggregate, tile, brick, etc.) on site;project 4) Interior landscaping; such as building foundation planting, 5) daG,and--cewrred waPo`ray Sec. 14-209 Revegetation: A. Purpose: Revegetation is required in order to restore natural vegetation and habitat and to minimize soil erosionp otential of graded and/or disturbed land resulting from any permitted or non-permitted construction activity in the Town. Further, revegetation provides improved air filtration and absorption of carbon monoxide and production of p oxygen and is considered an essential measure in preserving the natural resources and character of the unique Sonoran Desert ecosystem existing in Eastern Pima County. B. Graded areas that are to be revegetated according to an approved plan and shall be p revegetated with species appropriate to the site and its surrounding native habitat and in g conformance with the Oro Valley approved revegetation seed mixes (Addendum B). Appropriate,ro riate in this sense, means that revegetation will be done, to the extent practical, with the same species and density present on undisturbed adjacent or nearby sites. C. revegetation Acceptable includes the planting of desert trees, desert shrubs and large p specimen cacti or the seeding of desert trees, desert shrubs and grasses, with an adequate densityto control erosion. Seeds may be raked into the soil with appropriate mulch material or established by hydroseeding, anchored mulches or jute, rolled straw or similar material approved by the Planning and Zoning Director ADMINSTRATOR. D. The seed mixes specified in Addendum B are required for all revegetation work. Only those species that are compatible with the site, soils and conditions in which they will be planted shall be used. E. During the effective period of the grading permit, any graded area that becomes overgrown with weedy species ecies (e.g. Russian Thistle, Telegraph Plant, Desert Broom, Ragweed, Pigvveed, or Burrow Brush, to name but a few) shall be weeded in order to prevent the spread of such species onto adjacent properties. g F. The survival of revegetated plant materials may be enhanced by appropriate irrigation, whenp ractical, and other maintenance procedures needed to establish the plants. F:\OV\OV7\2001\07-01-05\Code Drafts\Article 14 0405ndoc 04/08/2002 Page 22 LANDSCAPE,IRRIGATION, AND BUFFER YARD PLAN REQUIREMENTS vegetation in areas of low soil productivity, the following G. In the process of establishing ce re uirements shall be followed as pre-conditions for minimum slope and surfa q revegetation: 1. Slopes shall be no steeper than 3:1 unless otherwise specified in a site-specific soils Civil report prepared by a RegisteredEngineer and approved by the Town Engineer; 2. Slopes/surfaces shall be designed for stability; 3. Slopes /surfaces shall be designed for control of surface and groundwater; 4. Slopes/surfaces shall be designed for quick establishment of vegetation; 5. A system of bench h terraces or diversions may be needed to reduce effective slope length. that will not readily For slopes steeper than 3:1 support soil binding plants, plant material be held in place with mechanical structures such as retaining walls or rip-rap may have to in accordance with a soilsreportprepared by re ared a licensed professional engineer and approved by the Town Engineer. I. Sites that are marginal for stabilization with vegetation alone shall be successfully held in place by a combination of mechanical and vegetative means as approved by the Town Engineer. Sec. 14-210 Review Procedures will be checked bythe Planning and Zoning Director ADMINISTRATOR for A. The submittal p completeness. If found to be incomplete as to those requirements set forth in Sec.14-20 4 through 14-20J 6 the submittal will be rejected and the applicant notified within 10 working days of the date the plans were received. B. Upon the Planning and d ZoningDirector's ADMINISTRATOR'S certification of the Landscape, Irrigation and Buffer Yard Plan submittal, copies of the completeness of p , ted to the reviewin agencies, and any other interested parties, who will plans will be distribu g g make known their recommendations, in writing. PLANNING AND ZONING ADMINISTRATOR THE WILL ASSEMBLE THE RESPONSES FROM THE VARIOUS REVIEWING AGENCIES AND SUBMIT THEN WITH HIS REPORT TO THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD. Sec. 14-211 Approval Procedures PLANS SUBMITTED WITH FINAL PLATS LANDSCAPE WILL BE CONSIDERED. BY the Development Review Board • . -- •"- -- -' '-, --.2. :- •.-: ' ' - • Plans at the next regular meeting, not less than 30 days after the date the filing is certified F:\OV\OV7\2001\07-01-05\Code Drafts\Article 14 0405a2doc 04/08/2002 Page 23 LANDSCAPE,IRRIGATION, AND BUFFER YARD PLAN REQUIREMENTS complete. • :- -r-•••-: ; . -- ' . • • _ - P.1 e Upon fec-ernmendrecommendations of the reaming agencies and any staff at}ens, the SUBMITTED WITH Town Council. LANDSCAPE PLANS recommendations to the DEVELOPMENT PLANS WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD WITH THE DEVELOPMENT PLANS. B. • . • - -- • ..-- - - -•A • :• • • • -- - - • : - • •. ••-- • •- • • . : • • • . •• . ' - • . - • - • •. • • . •- .. •:- rr •• =- •-: • • • • , Sec. 14-212 Inspections required bythe Oro ValleyZoning Code Revised to be landscaped, stabilized or A. All property revegetated shall pass a landscape inspection prior to a certificate of occupancy being issued p Official. Such insections shall be requested by the applicant at least 24 by the Building hours prior to being performed. B• The PlanningZoning and Director ADMINISTRATOR will have the right to refuse to pass any project not in conformance with the approved Landscape, Irrigation and Buffer Yard not meetingtheprovisions of this Chapter. All plant material shall meet the Plans or for , •.- .• • 1 ..-r • - A : . •: - . - Article. C. The Zoning Inspector ector will also have the right to reject landscape materials as being sub- standard as to size, condition or appearance. Sec. 14-213 Maintenance A. MAINTENANCE SHALL CONSIST OF: 1. REGULAR WATERING UNTIL PLANTS ARE FULLY ESTABLISHED AND CAPABLE OF SURVIVING WITHOUT IRRIGATION; KING ADJUSTING, REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT OF IRRIGATION 2. CHEC , EQUIPMENT, WITH THE ORIGINALLY SPECIFIED MATERIALS OR THEIR EQUIVALENTS, AS NECESSARY TO ENSURE WATER EFFICIENCY; 3. PRUNING, AND FERTILIZING; 4. CLEARING OF DEBRIS AND WEEDS; F:\OV\OV7\2001\07-01-05\Code Drafts\Article 14 0405doc 04/08/2002 Page 24 minimmh 4 � LANDSCAPE,IRRIGATION, AND BUFFER YARD PLAN REQUIREMENTS 5. REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF DEAD PLANTS WITHIN 45 DAYS AND WITH PLANT MATERIALS OF THE SAME SPEICIES AND OF SIMILAR SIZE AND QUALITY; 6. AERATING AND DE-THATCHING TURF AREAS; 7. REPLENISHING MULCH; AND, 8. REPAIR OF ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES. B. After the landscape installationcomplete,is com lete, p eriodic on-site landscape inspections may be performed by the Zoning Inspector to determine that:ENSURE PROPER MAINTENANCE. -4. The landscaped areas are beingmaintained in a weed free, trash free condition; ant materials, mg including salvagedplants which do not suive, are replaced within 45-lays. 3. Replacementplant materials are of a similar size and quality. 4. The irFigatien system, if requiredas a part art of landscape approval, shall be maintained in properworking order UN - - _ -. A3 . - - ! A . A . A . _ _ /' 1► , _ P.P. A , . C. LACK OF MAINTENANCE AS ABOVE DESCRIBED SHALL CONSTITUTE A PROPERTY OWNER AND/OR THIS ORDINANCE. THE VIOLATION OF OCCUPANT OR LESSEE SHALL BE HELD JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY LIABLE FOR ANY INFRACTION OF THE REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN THIS ARTICLE. F:\OV\OV7\2001\07-01-05\Code Drafts\Article 14 0405doc 04/08/2002 Page 25 LANDSCAPE,IRRIGATION, AND BUFFER YARD PLAN REQUIREMENTS ADDENDUM "A-1" ORO VALLEY APPROVED PLANT LIST (ALL AREAS) *See Bottom of List for Key to Symbols List Sorted Alphabetically by Botanical Name BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME STATUS ORIGIN NEEDS HARDY Abronia villosa Sand verbena Gc, an SD 1 Acacia abyssinica Abyssinian Acacia T Africa 3 sh Acacia angustissima White Ball Acacia S SD 2 sh Acacia berlandieri Guajillo S,T CD 3 Acacia cavenia Cavenia Acacia T SD, CD 2 Whitethorn Acacia, T S* SD, CD 1 Acacia constricts Mescat ' Acacia eburnia Needle Acacia T SD,CD 1 Acacia farnesiana Sweet Acacia T SD,CD 2 sh Acaciagg re ii Cat's Claw Acacia T,S SD, CD 1-2 g Southwestern SD CD 2 Acacia minuta (smallii) T,S,cI Sweet Acacia Acacia redolens Prostrate Acacia S,Gc Australia 2 Acacia rigidula Black Brush Acacia S,T CD 3 Acacia sa ping licina Wee in Wattle T,cl Australia 2 sh Acacia saligna Wattle Tree T Australia 1-2 sh Acacia schaffneri Twisted Acacia T CD 1-2 Acacia smallii Sweet Acaia T SD,CD 1-2 sh Acacia stenophylla Pencilleaf Acacia T Australia 1-2 Acacia willardiana Palo Blanco T SD 1-2 sh Agave americana Century Plant Sc CD 1-2 Agave Sc SD 1 Agave colorata A g Agave filifera Agave Sc CD 1-2 Agave huachucensis Huachuca Agave Sc SD 1-2 Agave lophantha Agave Sc CD 2 (univittata) g Agave ocahui Ocahui Agave Sc SD 1-2 palmeri ave almeri Palmer Agave Sc SD 1 Agave Victoria Regina Sc CD 1-2 Agave victoriae-reginae Agave F:\OV\OV7\2001\07-01-05\Code Drafts\Article 14 0405Vdoc 04/08/2002 Page 27 LANDSCAPE,IRRIGATION, AND BUFFER YARD PLAN REQUIREMENTS BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME STATUS ORIGIN NEEDS HARDY Agave Sc SD 1-2 Octopus A Agave vilmoriniana p g Sh Fragrant Bush, S SD, CD 2 Aloysia gratissimma Bee Brush Wright's Oregano, S SD, CD 2 Aloysia wrightii Lemon Verbena _ . Ambrosia (Franseria) Triangle-leaf (Franseria) S SD _deltoidea Bursage r Ambrosia (Franseria) White Bursage S SD 1 dumosa - Desert S SD 2 Anisacanthus thurberi Honeysuckle Queen's Wreath V,cl SD 2-3 (t) Antigonon leptopus _ . Pine-Leaf S SD, CD 2 Asclepias linaria Milkweed Asclepias subulata Desert Milkweed A SD 2 sh Aster bigelovii Aster an SD 1 (t) Aster tanacetifolius s Aster an SD, CD 1 (t) Four-Wing S SD, CD 1 Atriplex canescens Saltbush 1 Atriplex hymenelttra Desert Holly S SD,CD 1 Atriplex x lentiformis Quail Bush S SD 1 Atriplex lentiformis Brewer Saltbush S SD 1-2 b rewe ri Atriplex nummularia Old Man Saltbush S Australia 1 Atriplexpolycarpa of a Desert Saltbush S SD 1 p Atr Atriplex semibaccata Australian Saltbush S Australia 2 Bahia absinthifolia Desert Daisy p,cl SD 2 Baileya multiradiata Desert Marigold p,cl* SD, CD 1-2 Berberis harrisoniana Barberry S SD 3 ritos S S D 3 Berberis trifoliata Agritos Gr,cl SD, CD 1 Cane Bothriochloa barbinodisbeardgrass Brahea (Erythea) armata Mexican Blue Palm T SD 2-3 grass rass Gr CD Buchloe dactyloides , 2-3 Wooly Butterfly CD 2-3 Buddleia marrubifolia S,cl Bush _ _ Bursera microphylla Elephant Tree T SD 2,1 (t) F:\OV\OV7\2001\07-01-05\Code Drafts\Article 14 0405Udoc 04/08/2002 Page 28 LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, AND BUFFER YARD PLAN REQUIREMENTS BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME STATUS ORIGIN NEEDS HARDY Caesalpinia (Poinciana) Mexican Bird of S,cl* CD 2 mexicana, Paradise (yellow) Caesalpinia (Poinciana) Yellow Bird of S,cl* Argentina 1-2 gilliesii Paradise Red Bird of S,cl* Caribbean 3 sh Caesalpinia pulcherrima Paradise Red Fairy Duster, S,cl SD 2-3 Calliandra californica Baja Fairy Duster Fairy Duster, False S cl SD 1 g Calliandra eriophylla Mesquite ' Red Calliandra, S,cl SD 2-3 sh Calliandra peninsularis Baja Fairy Duster e ii Calylophus Calylophus hartw Gc,cl CD 3 g Common Trumpet V,cl SD, CD 2-3 Campsis radicans Creeper ntea Saguaro C SD 1 g Wormwood Senna, iI Australia 2-3 sh Cassia artemisioides S,c Feathery Cassa Cassia nemophila Green Cassia S,cl Australia 2 (eremophila) Silvery phyllodinea Cassia S,cl Australia 2-3 Shrubby Cassia S,cl Australia 2-3 Cassia wislezenii . Cathostecum e grama False rams Gr,cl SD 1 Spiny or Desert S SD, CD 1-2 Celtis pallida Hackberry Netleaf or Western T SD, CD 2 Celtis reticulata Hackberry Cephalophyllum 'Red Red Spike Ice Gc,Sc,cl 2 Spike' Plant Cercidium floridum Blue Palo Verde T,cl SD 2-3 Littleleaf or Foothill T cl SD 1 Cercidium microphyllum Palo Verde , Cercidium praecox Palo Brea T,cl SD 2 sh Sonoran Palo T,cl SD 1-2 Cercidium sonorae Verde Cercis canadensis var. Mexican Redbud T,S CD 3 mexicana Chilopsis linearis Desert Willow T,S,cl SD, CD 2-3 Desert Grape Ivy V, CD 1-2 I Cissus incisa p Cissus trifoliata Desert Grape Ivy V SD 1-2 F:\ov\Ov7\2001\07-01-05\Code Drafts\Article 14 0405doc 04/08/2002 Page 29 LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, AND BUFFER YARD PLAN REQUIREMENTS BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME STATUS ORIGIN NEEDS HARDY Condalia warnockii var. Condalia S SD, CD 1 kearneyana I Anacahuita, Texas T,S,cI CD 2-3 sh Cordia boissieri Olive Cordia parvifolia Littleleaf Cordia S,cl SD, CD 1-2 Cupressus arizonica Arizona Cypress T SD, CD I 2 Smooth Bark SD 2-3 Cupressus glabra T p Cypress Dalea bicolor var. argyrea Silver Dalea S SD 2-3 Dalea formosa Feather Dalea S SD,CD 2-3 Dalea frutescens Black Dalea S,cl CD 2-3 Trailing Indigo CD 2-3 Dalea greggii Gc Bush Dalea psorothamus Tree S T CD,SD 2-3 Smoke , spinosus pulchra Indigo Bush S,cl SD 2-3 Dalea . Dalea versicolor var. Indigo Bush, Dalea S,cl SD 3 sessilis Green Desert A CD 1 Dasylirion acrotriche Spoon Sotol, DesertA SD, CD 1 Dasylirion wheelers Spoon Digitaria californica Arizona cottontop Gr SD, CD Dodonaea viscosa Ho bush S SD, CD 1-2 sh Gc,p,cl,S SD CD 2-3 Dyssodia acetosa Dogweed D,CD , y Dyssodia pentachaeta Dyssodia Gc,an,p,c SD,CD 2-3 I Echinocactusgrusonii rusonii Golden Barrel C,cl SD 1-2 Hedgehog, C,cl SD, CD 1 Echinocereus spp. Rainbow Cactus California S,cl SD 1-2 sh Encelia californica Brittlebush (green) SD 1-2 sh Brittlebush S,cl Encelia farinosa ' Ephedra nevadensis Ephedra S SD 3 _ p _ Wax Plant, CD 1 Euphorbia antisyphilitica S Candelilla horbia Gc 2 Euphorbia myrsinites Eu p Eu horbia rigida A,Sc,cl* Africa 2 p Gopher Plant (biglandulosa) Africa F:\OV\OV7\2001\07-01-05\Code Drafts\Article 14 04055Ddoc 04/08/2002 Page 30 LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, AND BUFFER YARD PLAN REQUIREMENTS BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME STATUS ORIGIN NEEDS HARDY Fallugia paradoxa Apache Plume S SD 2,1 Ferocactus spp. Barrel Cactus C,cl SD, CD 1 Creeping Ficus pumila p g Fig GC,V 3,4 Forestiera ne omexicana Desert Olive S SD 1,2 p Fouquieria splendens Ocotillo A,cl SD, CD 1 Gazania rigens 'Copper Copper King cl Africa 3-4 g G c, King' Gazania Treasure Flower Gc,cl Africa 3-4 Gazania rigens Gazania Gazania rigens Trailing Gazania Gc,cl Africa 3-4 (t) leucolaena Geoffre a (Gourleia) So. 1 y Chilean Palo Verde T,cl decorticans America ' harknessii Gossypium ypium S,cl SD 2 (t) Haplopappus Turpentine Bush S,cl SD, CD 1 (Ericameria) laricifolius Hesperaloe funifera Giant Hesperaloe A CD 1-2 Red Yucca, Red Hesperaloe parviflora Flowered A,cl CD 1-2 p Hesperaloe Yellow Hibiscus, SD, CD 2 Hibiscus coulters S Coulters Hibiscus Hilaria berlangeri Curly mesquite Gr SD, CD 2 Hilaria mutica Tobosa grass Gr SD, CD 1 Hilaria rigida Big galleta grass Gr SD, CD 2 Hyptis emory i Desert Lavendar S SD 3 sh atro ha cardio h Ila Limberbush S SD 1 J p pY _ dioica Jatropha Jatropha S,cl CD 1 (t) Justicia (Beloperone) Chup arosa S,cl SD 2-3 (t) californica . Justicia candicans Red Jacobinia S,cl SD 3 sh Mexican Justicia s ici era Honeysuckle, S,cl SD 3 sh p g Firecracker Bush Bush LantanaNo. 3.4 (t) Lantana camara S,cl* America (many cultivars) Gc,cl* S. So. 3-4 (t) Lantana montevidensis Trailing Lantana Am. America F:\OV\OV7\2001\07-01-05\Code Drafts\Article 14 0405ndoc 04/08/2002 Page 31 LANDSCAPE,IRRIGATION, AND BUFFER YARD PLAN REQUIREMENTS BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME 1 STATUS I ORIGIN NEEDS HARDY Larrea tridentata Creosote Bush, S,cl ,SD CD 1 (divaricata) Greasewood Leucaena retusa Golden Leadball T,S,cl CD 1-2 Texas Ranger (all CD 2 Leucophyllum spp. S,cl p cultivars) Linum grandiflorum Scarlet Flax Gc,an,cl 3 'Rubrum' Linum lewisii Blue Flax an,cl SD, CD 3 _ Lupine an,cl SD 1 Lupinus arizonicus Lu p p Lupinus sparsiflorus Desert Lupine an,cl SD 1 p 1 Arro o Lupine an,cl SD Lupinus succulentus y p . Lycium exsertum Lycium S SD 1 y 1 Lycium fremontii Wolfberry S SD 1 Y . Lysiloma Candida Palo Blanco T,S SD 2,3 (t) Lysiloma thornberi Feather Tree T,S SD 2-3 sh t Macfadyena unguis-cati Cat's Claw Vine V,cl America 2-3 y g Mamillariaspp. Mamillaria Cactus C,cl SD, CD 1-2 Lavender Orchid 2-3 Mascagnia lilacina V,cl CD g Vine Mascagnia macroptera Yellow Orchid Vine V,cl SD, CD 2-3 sh g p - 1 ' Maytenus phyllanthoides Mangle Dulce S SD, CD 2 Y pY _ MelampodiumGc,p,cl SD CD 2 leucanthum Blackfoot Daisy SD,CD ' Merremia aurea Yellow Merremia V,cl SD 2-3 (t) Wait-a-Minute S SD 2-3 Mimosa biumcifera Bush Mimosa d socar a Velvetpod S,cl SD 2 Y p Bush Muhlenbergia dumosa Muhlenbergia, Gr SD 3-4 Bamboo Muhly _ Muhlenbergia emersleyi Bullgrass Gr,cl SD 1 Bush muhly porters y Gr,cl SD, CD 1 Muhlenbergia rigens Deer grass Gr SD 3 Muhlenbergia rigida 'Nashville' TM Gr,cl SD 3 Myoporum Gc Australia 3 M o Myoporum parvifolium y p F:\OV\OV7\2001\07-01-05\Code Drafts\Article 14 040502doc 04/08/2002 Page 32 LANDSCAPE,IRRICATION, AND BUFFER YARD PLAN REQUIREMENTS BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME t STATUS ORIGIN NEEDS HARDY vii Bear rass A Nolina bigelo SD 1-2 g _ Nolina map to ensis Tree Beargrass A,T SD 1-2 icrocar a Beargrass A Nolina m SD 1-2 p _ Nolina parryi Parry's Beargrass A SD 1-2 Oenothera berlandieri Mexican Evening Gc,cl CD 3 (speciosa childsii) Primrose Tufted Evening cl SD 2-3 Oenothera caespitosa Primrose p' Chihuahuan Oenothera stubbei Primrose, Baja Gc,cl CD 2-3 Primrose _ Desert Ironwood, SD, CD 1 (sh) Olneya tesota T y Tesota Prickly Pear, C SD, CD 1 Opuntia spp. Cholla O zo sis hymenoides Indian ricegrass Cr SD, CD 3 rY p Y Pappophorum Pappusgrass Gr SD 1 mucronulatum Passiflora foetida Passion Flower V SD 3 sh Pedilanthus macrocarpus Slipper Flower A,Sc,cl* SD 2 Penstemon baccharifolius Cutleaf Penstemon p,cl CD 1 Beardtongue ,cl SD, CD 1 Penstemon barbatus Penstemon p Eaton's ,cl SD 1 Penstemon eatoni Penstemon p Penstemon parryi Parry Penstemon p,cl SD 1 Canyon Penstemon Penstemon, ,cl SD 1 pseudospectabilis ectabilis Mohave p Beardtongue Penstemon superbus Superb Penstemon p,cl CD 1 Phyla nodiflora Lippia Gc,cl 3-4 Pistacia atlantica Mt. Atlas Pistache T Africa 2 Pistacia chinensis Chinese Pistache T,cl Asia 3 Pistache hybrid Pistacia terebinthus x terebinthus x T,cl 3 integerrima integerrima Pistacia vera Pistachio T Asia 2-3 F:\OV\OV7\2001\07-01-05\Code Drafts\Article 14 0405422doc 04/08/2002 Page 33 LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, AND BUFFER YARD PLAN REQUIREMENTS BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME I STATUS ORIGIN 1 NEEDS HARDY Pithecellobium flexicaule Texas Ebony T CD 2 sh PithecellobiumT SD 3 Mexican Ebony mexicanum Pithecellobium pallens Tenaza T CD 2 sh Thornless So. Mesquite Am. T# 2 Prosopis (So. Am. hybrid) America hybrid) So. 2 Prosopis alba Argentine Mesquite T# America So. 2 Prosopis chilensis Chilean Mesquite T# America Prosopis glandulosa Honey or Texas T# CD 2 p glandulosa Mesquite Screwbean T SD, CD 2 Prosopis pubescens Mesquite velutina Velvet Mesquite T# SD 2 Prosopis p Psilostrophe coopers Paper Flower p,cl SD, CD 2 Quercus arizonica Arizona White Oak T SD, CD 3 emoryi emo i Emory Oak T SD, CD Holly ilex Oak T 3 Quercus virginiana Heritage Live Oak T SE U.S.A. 3 'Heritage' Rhus microphylla Littleleaf Sumac S,cl CD 2 Sugar Bush, Sugar S SD 2 Rhus ovata Sumac Rhus wens Evergreen Ever reen Sumac S,cl CD 2 Ruellia californica Ruellia S,cl SD 3 (t) Ruellia peninsularis Ruellia S,cl SD 3 (t) Ruschia uncinatus Ruschia Sc,Gc 2 Salvia chamaery d oides Blue Sage S,p,cl CD 2-3 Salvia clevelandii Cleveland Sage S,cl 3 Salvia columbariae Chia An,cl SD 3 Salvia farinacea Mealy Blue Sage S,cl CD 3-4 Texas Red Salvia, cl CD 2-3 Salvia greggii S,Autumn Sage F:\OV\OV7\2001\07-01-05\Code Drafts\Article 14 0405524.cloc 04/08/2002 Page 34 LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, AND BUFFER YARD PLAN REQUIREMENTS BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME STATUS ORIGIN NEEDS HARDY Mexican Bush S,cl CD 2-3 Salvia leucantha Sage Mohave Sage mohavensis S,cl SD 2 Scarlet Sage splendens S,cl CD 2-3 Sambucus mexicana Mexican Elderberry T SD, CD 2 Soapberry Sapindus saponaria p rY T* SD, CD 3-4 Dusty Miller, Silver P,cl* 3 Senecio cineraria Plant Senna covesii Desert Senna P,cl SD 1-2 Senna lindheimeriana Senna S CD 4 sh Cassia, Shrubby S, ,cl SD, CD 2 Senna wislizenii Senna p Simmondsia chine1 nsis Jojoba, Goat Nut S SD 1-2 Mescal Bean, Sophora secundiflora Texas Mountain S,T,cl* CD 2-3 Laurel Arizona Sophora S, T, cl* SD 2-3 Sophora arizonica Sphaeralcea spp. Globe-Mallow P,cl SD, CD 1 Sporobolus airoides Alkali Sacaton Gr SD, CD 3 Sporobolus contractus Spike dropseed Gr SD, CD Sporobolus wrg i htii Sacaton Gr SD, CD 1 Stenocereus (t) Organ Pipe (Lemaireocereus) C SD Cactus thurberi New Mexico Gr SD, CD 2 Stipa neomexicana feathergrass Mountain Tagetes lemmoni Marigold p,cl SD 3-4 Tecoma stans var. Trumpet-Bush S,cl SD, CD 2-3 sh angustata Two-feather Gr SD, CD 2 Trucklers crinita trichloris Trichocerius 1-2 Trichocereus spp. C Cactus Tridens muticus Slim tridens Gr SD, CD 2 Ungnadia speciosa Mexican Buckeye T,cl CD 3 Vauquelinia californica Arizona Rosewood S,T# SD 2 F:\ov\ov7\2001\07-01-05\Code Drafts\Article 14 0405adoc 04/08/2002 Page 35 LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, AND BUFFER YARD PLAN REQUIREMENTS BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME STATUS ORIGIN NEEDS HARDY Goodding gooddingii g Verbena p,cl SD 3-4 So. 4 Verbena peruviana Peruvian Verbena p,cl America to Moss Verbena, So. 3 Verbena tenuisec p,cl America (pulchella) Fineleaf Verbena Verbesina encelioides Crown Beard an,cl SD, CD 2 Eye p,cl SD 2 Golden E Viguiera deltoidea Y Chaste Tree, T,S,cI 2 Vitex agnus-castus Monk's Pepper Spanish Bayonet A SD 1 Yucca aloifolia Yucca Yucca baccata Banana Yucca A SD, CD 1 Yucca brevifolia Joshua Tree A CD 1 Giant Dagger A CD 1 Yucca carnerosana Yucca p Yucca elata Soaptree Yucca A SD, CD 1 Small Soapweed Sc U.S.A. 1 Yucca glauca Yucca . Yucca rigida Blue Dagger Yucca A,cl CD 1 Yucca rostrata Beaked Yucca A CD 1 Yucca schottii Mountain Yucca Sc SD Yucca treculeana Tree Yucca A CD 1 Yucca Whipp lei Our Lord's Candle A SD 1 Hummingbird Zauschneria californica Gc,cl SD 3Trumpet Hummingbird S SD 3 Zauschneria latifolia Flower . Zinnia acerosa Desert Zinnia p,cl SD, CD 1 Rocky Mountain ,cl CD 2 Zinnia grandiflora Zinnia p Zizyphus obtusifolia Greythorn S,T SD 1 sh F:\OV\OV7\2001\07-01-05\Code Drafts\Article 14 0405afdoc 04/08/2002 Page 36 LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, AND BUFFER YARD PLAN REQUIREMENTS ADDENDUM "A-2" ORO VALLEY APPROVED PLANT LIST (INTERIOR AREAS ONLY) *SeeList for Keyto Symbols List Sorted Alphabetically by Botanical Name Bottom of Y BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME STATUS ORIGIN NEEDS HARDY g Acacia aneura Mul a T Australia. 2 sh Waxleaf Acacia T,S Australia 1 Acacia crasspedocarpa _ Acacia cultriformis Knife-Leaf Acacia T,S Australia 2 sh Acacia notabilis Acacia S Australia 2 Aloe barbadensis Barbados Aloe Sc,cl Africa 2-3 sh Cape ferox Ca e Aloe Sc,cl Africa 2-3 sh Mediterranean I Africa 2-3 sh Aloe saponaria Sc,c Aloe g Bougainvillea spp. Bougainvillea V,S,cl Brazil 3 (t) Brachychiton populneus Bottle Tree T Australia 2-3 Callistemon citrinus Lemon Bottlebrush T,S,cl Australia 3 sh Gc,Sc,cl, Africa 3 (t) Carpobrotus edulis Ice Plant Africa Mediter- taurea cineraria Dusty Miller p,cl 3 Cen anian Cereusp eruvianus (sh) Peruvian South C 1-2 'Monstrosus' Cereus America Mediterranean Fan T Spain 2-3 Chamaerops humilis Palm Bush Morning S,Gc,cl* Mediter- Convolvulus 1-2 cneorum Glory Medit. anian Ground Morning Africa 3 sh Convolvulus mauritanicus Gc,cl Glory 3 sh Rosewood T India Dalbergia sissoo r African Daisy, South An,cl 4 Cape Dimorphotheca sinuata Ca e Marigold Africa Easter Lily, Sea So. 1 Echinopsis spp. C,cl America Urchin Cactus Eremophila decipiens Emu Bush S,cl Australia 1 Eucalyptus campaspe Silver Gimlet T Australia 2-3 sh Eucalyptus formanii T Australia 2 Eucalyptus leucoxylon White Iron Bark T,cl Australia 2 (rosea) Tiny Capsule T Australia 1-2 Eucalyptus microtheca Eucalyptus F:\OV\OV7\2001\07-01-05\Code Drafts\Article 14 040555..doc 04/08/2002 Page 37 LANDSCAPE,IRRIGATION, AND BUFFER YARD PLAN REQUIREMENTS BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME STATUS ORIGIN NEEDS HARDY Eucalyptus polyanthemos Silver Dollar Gum T Australia 2 Eucalyptus rudis Desert Gum T Australia 2 Swamp spathulata Mallee T Australia 3 So. Fed 3 i'oa sellowiana Pineapple Guava T,S,cI America Alligator Bark T SD, CD 3 Juniperus deppeana Juniper Malephora crocea Croceum, Ice Plant Gc,Sc,cl 2-3 nis Mediterania 3 Myrtus comma Twisted Myrtle S# 'Boetica' n mmunis Mediterania 3 Myrtus co Dwarf Myrtle S n 'Compact Heavenly Bamboo S,cl 3 Nandina domestics (many cultivars) o aea 'Swan Mediter- Swan 3 Olea ear p Hill Olive T anian _Hill' _ Osteospermum Trailing African Gc,cl Africa 3-4 sh fruticosum Daisy Pentzia incana Karoo Bush Gc Africa 1-2 Canary Island Date T 3 Phoenix canariensis Palm Pinus edulis Pinon Nut Pine T 2-3 g Pinus eldarica Afghan Pine T# Asia 2 Singleleaf Pinon T Mojave 2 Pinus monophylla Pine Mediter- 2-3 Pinus pinea Italian Stone Pine T anian Pinus roxburghii Chir Pine T Asia 3 Pittosporum Willow Pittosporum T Australia 2 phillyraeoides Punka granatum Pomegranate ranate S,T,cl India 2-3 Mediter- 2 Quercus suber Cork Oak T* anian Rhus lances African Sumac T Africa 2 I Lady Banks Rose, S,Gc,V 3 Rosa banksiae Tombstone Rose Med iter- 2-3 Rosmarinus officinalis Bush Rosemary S,cl anian marinus officinalis Dwarf or Trailing Mediter- 2-3 Ros Gc,cl anian 'Prostratus' Rosemary F:\ov\ov7\2001\07-01-05\Code Drafts\Article 14 040593doc 04/08/2002 Page 38 LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, AND BUFFER YARD PLAN REQUIREMENTS BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME STATUS ORIGIN NEEDS HARDY SantollnaLavendar Cotton S,Gc Mediter- 2-3 chamaecyp arissus anian Mediter- Santolina 3-4 virens Green Santolina Gc,S,cl anian Sea Purslane, Ice Gc Africa 2 (t) Sesuvium verrucosum Plant Cape Hone suckle S,cl Africa 4 sh Tecomaria capensls Y ium chamaed s Prostrate Mediter- 2-3 Teucr rY Gc,p anian (prostratum) Germander Teucrium fruticans Bush Germander S 3 Yucca recurvifolia Pendulous or A U.S.A. 2 (pendula) Curveleaf Yucca KEY TO SYMBOLS: T - TREE S - SHRUB A - ACCENT PLANT GC- GROUNDCOVER C - CACTUS STATUS SC- SUCCULENT(OTHER THAN CACTI) ✓ - VINE GR- ORNAMENTAL GRASS AN- ANNUAL P - PERENNIAL CL - SEASONAL COLOR(SHOWY FLOWERS,FALL COLOR OR BERRIES) CD- Chihuahuan Desert Region-(broadly interpreted to include a large area of north central and northwest Mexico,southwest Texas,southern New Mexico and extreme southeast Arizona.) ORIGIN SD- Sonoran Desert Region-(broadly interpreted to include the arid and semi-arid areas of northwest Mexico,southeast California and most of Arizona south of the Mogollon Rim.) (Note: Chihuahuan and Sonoran Desert Regions annotated by Matt Johnson,Native Plant Society.) APPROXIMATE WATERING 1 - No supplemental irrigation once established. established. NEEDS(depending on soil and 2 - Once a month during the growing season once climate conditions) 3 - Twice a month during the growing season once established. 4 - Once a week during the growing season once established sh- Semi-hardy--some dieback in a hard frost (t) - Tender(may be severely damaged or killed in a hard frost) HARDINESS * - Toxic;may be harmful if eaten.(For more information call Arizona Poison Control Center at(520)626-6016.) # - Exceptions to the nomenclature in Hortus III. I - Invasive--may spread and intrude into natural areas. F:\OV\OV7\2001\07-01-05\Code Drafts\Article 14 04055adoc 04/08/2002 Page 39 LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, AND BUFFER YARD PLAN REQUIREMENTS ADDENDUM "B" ORO VALLEY APPROVED REVEGETATION SEED MIX LIST BASE SEED MIX Use the following seeds: Species * U PLS Rate,lbs./ac. (*Pure Live Seed) Purple Three-Awn,Aristida purpurea(P,W) 2.0 � Sand Dropseed, Sporobolus crypthandrus(P,W) 1.0 Indian Wheat,Plantago insularis(A,C) 3.0 Desert Globe mallow, Sphaeralcea ambigua(P,C,W) 1.0 Desert Senna,Cassia covesii(P,W,) 2.0 Brittlebush,Encelia farinosa(P, C/W) 1.5 Bursage,Ambrosia deltoidea(P,C) 4.0 Turpentine Bush,(Haplopappus laricifolius(P,C,W) 1.0 Desert Marigold,Baileya multiradiata(P,C,W) 1.0 -2.0 Penstemons,Penstemons sp. (P,A,C/W) 1.0-2.0 Plus choose a minimum of one (1) grass and two (2) non-grass species from the following, utilizing those species appropriate to the season during which they will be planted. Grass Species Plains Bristlegrass, Setaria macrostachya(P,W) 2.0 Side-Oats Grama,Buteloua curtipendula(P,W) 2.0 Plains Love Grass,Eragrostis intermedia(P,W) 1.0 Green Sprangle-Top,Leptochloa dubia(P,W) 1.0 Non-grass Species Creosote,Larrera divaricata(P,W) 6.0 Four Wing Salt Bush,Atriplex canescens(P,C) 3.0 Whitethorn Acacia,Acacia contricta(P,W) 2.0 Paper Flower,Psilostrophe cooperi(P,C/W) 1.0-2.0 Desert Saltbush,Atriplex polycarpa(P,C) 1.0 -3.0 Quail Brush,Atriplex lentiformis(P,C) 1.0-2.0 Mexican Poppy, Escholtzia mexicana(A,C) 1.0-3.0 Desert Bluebells,Phacelia campanulavia(A,C) 1.0-3.0 Sand Verbena, Verbena sp. (P, C/W) 1.0-2.0 Lupine, Lupinus sp. (A,W) 1.0-3.0 p KEY TO SYMBOLS: A=Annual; P=Perennial; C=Germinates and thrives in the cool season; W=Germinates and thrives in warm season; C/W=Germinates and thrives in cool/warm seasons. (Note: The coolValley season in Oro runs September through March, and the warm season is from March through October. There is an overlap of seasons.) F:\OV\OV7\2001\07-01-05\Code Drafts\Article 14 04056Ddoc 04/08/2002 Page 40 LANDSCAPE,IRRIGATION, AND BUFFER YARD PLAN REQUIREMENTS ADDENDUM "C" ORO VALLEY PROHIBITED PLANT LIST shrub whose mature height may reasonably be expected to exceed 25 1. Any species of tree or g feet, with the exception of those indigenous plants, listed in Addendum A��, which may p g naturally exceed 25 feet. • europaea), will beprohibited for reasons of their profuse production of 2. Olive trees (Olea eur p ),allergy-producing pollen. However, the "Swan Hill Olive" and the "Wilson Hill Olive" varieties may be used due to its no-flowering non-pollen producing status. 3. Fountain Grass (Pennisetum setaceum) will be prohibited as a defined weed with the potential to spread throughout the Town and become a fire hazard. 4. Common Bermuda Grass (Cynodon dactylon) will be prohibited as a defined weed and for its profuse production of allergy-producing pollen. 5. Mexican Palo Verde (Parkinsonia aculeata) will be prohibited as harborer of pests and for its ability spreadthroughout to the Town thereby altering the present natural desert. 6. MulberryTrees (Morus) will be prohibited as noxious pollen producers. 7. Desert Broom Baccharis sarothroides) will be prohibited as a defined weed with the potential to spread throughout the Town . F:\OV\OV7\2001\07-01-05\Code Drafts\Article 14 0405E2kdoc 04/08/2002 Page 41 LANDSCAPE,IRRIGATION, AND BUFFER YARD PLAN REQUIREMENTS (original Addendum"A") A DDEN 44 4 m A ORO VALLEY APPROVED PLANT LIST Trees Ccrcidium floridum Blue Palo Verde Cercidium microphyllum Foothill Palo Verde Chilopsis linearis Desert Willow Lysiloma Candida Palo Blanco Quercus vurginiana var. Heritage Heritage Live Oak F:\ov\ov7\2001\07-01-05\Code Drafts\Article 14 0405E2d.oc 04/08/2002 Page 42 LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, AND BUFFER YARD PLAN REQUIREMENTS - . -. • - t-: __.�__• !�_ttt�-_='�:-moi� _! i • :- • • - _ -__-- ---�-i - Yellow Bird of Paradise Cacsalpin•a� �}�� •--• - _-_-a-- -fit-:�■ t:�t - -- i • • •• t r •_z-: - •• . -: Cassia biflor-a Texas Cassia Ccreocarpus Mountain Mahogany . ._ .• �n.nn �nny� -j, I2 F:\OV\OV7\2001\07-01-05\Code Drafts\Article 14 040542doc 04/08/2002 Page 43 LANDSCAPE,IRRIGATION, AND BUFFER YARD PLAN REQUIREMENTS . - i_-.•: _ F:\OV\OV7\2001\07-01-05\Code Drafts\Article 14 0405E12k1oc 04/08/2002 Page 44 LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, AND BUFFER YARD PLAN REQUIREMENTS (IP MP Gazania rigoas Treasure Flower . • - - - om-Getsp -fitki-tie000144.-----Ty-• •--i r'F• y Desert See. Mix F:\0\7\0v7\2001\07-01-05\Code Drafts\Article 14 04056 doc 04/08/2002 Page 45 Article 14-2 Landscape, Irrigation and Buffer Yard Plan Benefits of the Amendment ▪ Incorporates General Plan policies . Encourages superior landscape design . Simplifies the code . Clarifies requirements ▪ Addresses inadequate standards Amendment Process to Date TAC Meetings and Consultant a Public Notice . Town Website August 2001 • 300 Letters sent to Developers, Landscape Professionals, etc., in August and October & January a Planning & Zoning Commission • 2 study sessions and 1 hearing a TC Study Session January 28, 2002. Applicability a Landscape Plans and landscape!reveg etati on are required for new projects where a Development Plan or Plat is required • Revegetation is required for any disturbance authorized by a Type 3 Grading Permit 2 f:„.......,f,„,:,„. ,.... ,...„ itiiniplity ,,,,,,,,,„ ,- ..:‘,;.. .--,:-:... '.... ..::: 7:m Current Buffer Yards Table .„.,:.....: „: ...________...,........„....,.........„,„,„,..,_..........,..„..._,_,,..z.„,„,..,.:„,........... NATIVE PLANT sALVA.E AND LANDSCAPE PLAN REQW,REM.g.ta...* ADIDENOOM D f3r. UIRED SUFFER YARD*. r i EXISTING'AOJACENT USE/ZONE , 1 PDOP0SED UsErZONE I 7:4%; 1:Ri.-43 1 R:-3-01-R1-20 1 R1-1C 1 R1-7 1 R-4 1 —1 I CRI ! GC I il f'--:—,-.1:144 Sir,DIe,amilY 1 I I -7 I 1 j ' 1 1 1 1 g R1-36 S,rIgI.F.,11,1Y I: I k I I _I-I 1. . O 1 . I. ,, H___ Icicii__Dpi ;c 1 comrneyol.i 0 D 0 010 , 0i0L0 , 0 , 0 : 0 ' 0 I C2 Cornmarcial . 0 , C D , 01 0 I,D 0 0 , 01, 0i010 , 1 I i11 CRI Campt,PA,industrial , C I______D 1 1 D I 0 1 0 0 I L0io D010 , 0 : 0 , 0 ; 1 1 1 —1 ililliili: I 4-.91 3 ................... .............. w ■ ryySimplify GroupSimilar Zones ▪ Abutting zoning districts of similar intensity do not need buffer y ards or screening. 9 ▪ Zoningdistricts dissimilar abutting intensity requireyard. a buffer 11111 Improved Yard Table .:..... :::.�_..:.:..,,:.:..pesi9�ittiiii+z�iYAx�i.>i.YmwYgYi 3JS.R>'Y`vMaCSa�1'+.'J�Ro.v;R'L\::;:y.,i�.:•,::C?.t!'::::tw::+t`?3:�'. ZONING DISTRICT OF ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT SITE ZONING DISTRICT OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT R1-144,R1-72,R1-43, R1-10,R1-7,R- R-4R,R-6,R-S, C-N,C-1,C-2,T- R1-36,R1-20 4,SDH-6 PPS&C' P,P-1 S& R1-144,R1-72,R1-43, NO BUFFER NO BUFFER NO BUFFER NO BUFFER R1-36,R1-20 R1-10,R1-7,R-4,SDH-6 A NO BUFFER NO BUFFER NO BUFFER R-4R,R-6,R-S,PBOS, B B A NO BUFFER PSBC C-N,C-1,C-2,T-P,P-1 B B B NO BUFFER 4 Street Yards /:: /,qY M:4Y:!•sa:�aY..�N[�vC!m't•#>a.. �+.�ro:aYvov.r:..A'�'S:.:'+..ui,.'Ci:[rai'.....: :.: ///A2eo[�//4�w'/.e.. ..Nva.. TABLE 2A:REQUIRED PERIMETER STREET FRONTAGE BUFFER YARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL USES PERIMETER ARTERIAL COLLECTOR RESIDENTIAL STREET TYPE STREET FRONTAGE B(25'min) A(15'min) A(15'min) BUFFER YARD TABLE 2B:REQUIRED PERIMETER STREET FRONTAGE BUFFER YARDS FOR COMMERCIAL USES PERIMETER ARTERIAL COLLECTOR RESIDENTIAL STREET TYPE STREET FRONTAGE B(30'min) B(30'min) B(30'min) BUFFER YARD BUFE GuFq rr copy. "i"----- foo' ....., ,. / 2d .. (Q.C.-V) - d;t Uic.m. Ll:t ' co, .1 r1_z.,° t4SP:W'° 1 qi._---,o..34,.eil:Aetv R:t'3, ,....,. -72- 1'- :ice 0*Re 6 DM1N-60 8Q —t'ktctr a r U. T . to A tighee Y•AerbAy the 5 New Buffer Yards TABLE 3:REQUIRED PLANTINGS FOR BUFFER YARD"A" MINIMUM WIDTH 10' 15' 20' PLANTS PER 100 5 TREES 4 TREES NATURAL LINEAL FEET 5 SHRUBS 4 SHRUBS DESERT 10 ACCENTS 8 ACCENTS TABLE 4:REQUIRED PLANTINGS FOR BUFFER YARD"B" MINIMUM WIDTH 15' 20' 30' 40' PLANTS PER 100 8 TREES 7 TREES 5 TREES NATURAL LINEAL FEET 8 SHRUBS 7 SHRUBS 5 SHRUBS DESERT 15 ACCENTS 12 ACCENTS 10 ACCENTS f, Simplify & Improve Buffer Yards • Reduces number of buffer yards from 27 to 7 • Eliminates ineffective options of 5 ft and 7.5 ft in width • Requires supplemental plant material to increase effectiveness of natural buffers • Eliminates buffer yards in the front of lots 6 Current Screening Table . ,. .....,___ ,...,....,„.._,..____...,..„,. . .. „. ...,„„_,,, :• .5.117u,c Li.]ra 1 Ete,11-1. 5. — ' --,•;=-7-.) :: .. (---7 -4. 04,.....,. f C..."-•\, ____",... (--- ,_ ...'",,... 1....4,1_, i-,' r-L-1- k-•-.:.• .--.-: .... r- : . I .•••----- --lc-- ,..___a_jz..,..\,..._...r—.--..' .......: ............... ,... . . , •...... ,.0--4"...- -----_, ...-c- ' — 11.1.1.11rani„....'...:::..•..-......: .11 ) ,... 11.4-e'tali. 2?..6:31111. ....,.W. ....... it 1...s..42,....,....4.--24:.'..,...:-.- ... t2.2„ 72.. 284" tvi W--10 4u- "-40 6tt. .4tevnyit cony itnttittnic b,..1.4i,y...list:rod k:11`.MO width 1,4W-72 "-72Olit., fithabictwevt,Ipart3i.t. ;`,.ir spnlial veticts N4W-E•t ti., prtrvi41.I...M.6i,, NINV-1-4t1 12ii- thi.ttaiititl 13.. p....v.,...rt._ L-'-' -' c'------")/ ,--,"--:t7-'4,*-11-2`,1,•-•-•,. . W-U---- ..:t c 1 ''' „es‘At-r,1--1•A11_4_,IP'''n- •;),,,,,,,;,,,,fcAnfircr,,,“.,...,....,,,,,t,ttwut,cot',1,fent,and 1 'r'-'- - Ar41,itct:ittrid contcx, Sx1$11,121 111.10.11 IV-1 3-tr b.1:611 With Mr'mascplry wan e-,i,-, - C.,:,..cs.e.:'CjI.:00.-- .1%W.1 41t.,enti with 611"ittAsonry whit .11W, 60.•tr.crut',kJ,-7,.111..(1311,WI.,I 1 I"R. Improved Screening Table ..•:.',Eif'::;i:3:7,ji'. ZONING DISTRICT OF ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT SITE ZONING DISTRICT OF PROPOSED R1-10,R1-7, R-4R,R-6,R-S, DEVELOPMENT R1-144,R1-72, C-N,C-1,C-2, R-4P&OS, R1-43,R1SDH-,- 6 36,R1-20 T-P,P-1 PS&C R1-144,R1-72,R1-43, R1-36,R1-20 NO NO NO NO R1-10,R1-7,R-4,SDH-6 YES NO NO NO R-4R,R-6,R-S,P&OS, PS&C YES NO NO NO C-N,C-1,C-2,T-P,P-1 YES YES YES NO 7 Ee Improved Screening Table ▪ Simplifies requirements • Opaque screen 5' high • Landscape must be outside walls to screen them • Eliminates "wall to wall" alleys . DRB may waive the requirement Flexibility for Better Design DRB Authority • Waive Screening Requirements • Increase/Lower Height . Increase Number of Plantings • Modify Buffer Yard Requirements s , vfic: Plant Lists ▪ List A-1 . Native Plants that are appropriate anywhere . List A-2 . Non-native, low-water-use plants that are appropriate for interior areas . List B • Seed mixes . List C . Prohibited Plants Water Conservation Improvements ▪ New Irrigation Standards . Drip systems . Water harvesting ▪ No overflow . Four design guidelines proposed to improve irrigation design . Fountains . In shaded/protected area . Recycle water 9 . ;s h Conclusion • Furthers General Plan policies • Encourages superior design • Allows modification to improve or to eliminate conflicts • Simplifies Code by streamlining tables • Eliminates Code deficiencies • Clarifies requirements End 10 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: April 17, 2002 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: David Ronquillo, Planner I SUBJECT: OV12-96-04C, MMLA, REPRESENTING COTTONWOOD PROPERTIES, REQUESTS APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR RAMS CANYON PHASE III; LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 1.5 MILES NORTH FROM THE INTERSECTION OF ORACLE ROAD AND FIRST AVENUE ON THE EAST SIDE OF ORACLE ROAD IN THE LA RESERVE PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT, PARCEL #22004010H BACKGROUND: Co Properties,Pro erties, re resented byMMLA, has proposed to develop Rams Canyon Phase III, a 21 lot p subdivision consistingof 4.85 acres. The proposed development is located east of Oracle Road and just north of Rams Field Pass. The zoning for this site is Campus Park Industrial, with residential permitted under the cumulative zoning enabled in the Oracle Road Scenic Corridor Overlay District(Sec 10-401 OVZCR). The topographyisrelatively o a h flat with minimal vegetation existing due to previous grading on the site. Oracle Road is directly adjacent and is approximately 18' higher in elevation. 'JMMARY: Thero osed plat will consist of single family residential dwellings within Phase IH with lots ranging in size from p p approximately 4 950-10 419 square feet. The subdivision provides two entrances, both on the southeast side of pp y q thero ert alongBroken Rock Drive. The subdivision is designed with two cul-de-sacs and common area"A" p p y along the northwest side of the subdivision (adjacent to Oracle Road) The minimum gross land area per lot is 5,450 square feet and the average lot size is 5,558 square feet. The following are the proposed setbacks: Front 20', Side 10' (between buildings) and Rear 10', with a maximum building height of 25'. The aforementioned setbacks and development standards comply with the R-4 zoning requirements and are consistent with the existing lots in Phase I and II of Rams Canyon. Surrounding Land Uses Northeast—La Reserve, Planned Area Development, Rams Canyon Phase II, Single Family Residential. Southwest—Pima County, Big Horn Commerce Center, Campus Park Industrial. Southeast—La Reserve, Planned Area Development, Rams Canyon Phase I, Single Family Residential. Northwest—Steam Pump Ranch, Planned Area Development across Oracle Road. 'oracle Road Scenic Corridor Overlay District (ORSCOD) The subject property is located within ORSCOD on the east side of Oracle Road. A viewshed analysis for this J p p y site was prepared, due to the significant views to the adjacent Catalina Mountains. Based on this analysis, the F:\OV\OV 12\1996\12-96-4c\TCrpt.doc TOWN OF ORO VALLEY OUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 3 proposed development will have no significant viewshed impacts. The ORSCOD requires a 100' preservationalong zone the right-of-way, only if significant vegetation exists. Since no significantvegetation ve etation is present, a preservation zone is not required. On the other hand, a streetscape buffer yard is required Chapter byOVZCR Cha ter 14. These issues will be addressed, once the landscape plan is submitted. and berm standards apply to all properties adjacent to Oracle Road. Since Oracle Road is The ORSCOD wall . 18' higher in elevation than theproposed site, the Development Review Board determined that a approximately g . would not serve the intended purpose. In lieu of requiring a berm, they added a condition for the wall or berm p � provide to additional trees/shrubs along the trail path on the northwest side of the property. Please see the section below for further information regarding vegetation along the trail path. Recreation Area In comply order to com 1 with the recreational area requirements and the Development Review Board conditions the following must be achieved: • A trail connection extending from the Canada Del Oro Wash southwest to Rams Field Pass (See Attachment). This trail must incorporate a 5' wide meandering path with decomposed granite that is treated to create a stable hard surface. The path must also provide a smooth transition from the existing path to the proposed trail and connection to Rams Field Pass. This may be achieved by a stair-stepped treatment to facilitatep ath access and prevent erosion. The applicant shall provide vegetation along the trail path utilizingbuffer yard "D" standards and excluding the natural desert option. The goal is to achieve a site obscuring screen along the trail path adjacent to Oracle Road. • One additional active amenity is required. Staff recommends adding such an amenity to the existing recreational area located in Phase I of this development. These issues will be addressed in the landscape plan. Traffic Impacts The development will have a minor impact on the intersection of Rams Field Pass and Oracle Road. Drainage Existing drainage patterns atterns will be maintained. Detention requirements have been waived due to the minor 100- year g pflows. A Floodplain Use Permit will be required to modify an existing floodplain along the west side of this development. v-ading This 4.85 acreJ ro'ect is a mass graded subdivision. A Type 2 Grading Permit will be required to construct p buildingpads, public streets, drainage structures, and utilities for this development. F:\ov\ov12\1996\12-96-4c\TCrpt.doc 1 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 7UNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 3 of 3 t DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD ACTION: On March 12, 2002, the Development Review Board voted unanimously (5-0) to conditionally approve the To date the applicant has complied with all pertinent conditions. The remaining proposed preliminary plat. pp conditions will be addressed in the landscape plan. GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE: ry Prelimina Plat is in conformance with the General Plan Policy Elements. In Staff finds that the proposed which states. "View protection shall be an essential aspect of Oro Valley's community particular, Policy 1.1 E, design review and project app roval. " Based on the viewshed analysis, significant views to the Catalina Mountains � properties and the adjacent ro erties will not be affected with the proposed development. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the PreliminaryPlat for Rams Canyon Phase III, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit"A". SUGGESTED MOTIONS: rnove to approve OV12-96-04C, Preliminary Plat for Rams Canyon Phase III, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit "A" attached, herewith. OR I move to approve of OV 12-96-04C Preliminary Plat for Rams Canyon Phase III, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit A, and the following added conditions: • OR I move to deny of OV 12-96-04C Preliminary Plat for Rams Canyon Phase III, finding that: Attachments: / . c,..4 1. Exhibit"A" lat•Pla .s i • Zon. dministrator 2. Preliminary Plat _ / - , Co • -,,unity Deva- opment Director / V Town Manager F:\OV\OV 12\1996\12-96-4c\TCrpt.doc EXHIBIT "A" OV12-96-04C RAMS CANYON PHASE III required on the Final Plat, stating that the owners of lots 16-21 shall agree to 1. A general note shall be re accept flows from Rams Canyon Phase II. 2. Drainage addenda shall be submitted with a cover letter& stamped and sealed by the engineer of record 3. The complete hydraulichydrologic and h drolo is drainage report shall be submitted and approved prior to issuance of a grading permit. F:\ov\ovi2\1996\12-96-4c\TCrpt.doc ,0,0,,,,,,,,, -•c03,p •33j 9,002 02.53 ai rU,,,,,,H,,, !I q �! �*t r- ii A OZomZ U N�7 DDN OOA V< onDS"_�1> W a(0� O� mOr(cp r�SS,oCO�00 ;O 0mmrrN =-i•�''j'�j �rnC CSr:aOIiAZ-m 0rO<5 l Wz NO(nSNm >>;- t' Z(OnD• n�5Z tA !,1; orD' U411 > P 1--i N ZD AON DN GN Z� mE 0 g 61 Pgih OmMI2 m OmD��D �D fW 9.N- Pm pIlii., Z� O; m�C O o ''71 )i- < z OrZD ' mvm� nDWD.mDON0A70OC>ONOO-0omCOOOq = mD Nb rm•1aW8"' N00 �m gymn OD am mm z roz� �( D�5 DO> mW f'l • - DWD9 D' 0 MI' (r-2'o 89,-c__ cPN -o' -O( COr m �)-og 7 0%m ,--1:«Z ,,,,,ii WIN N � Or0On (na 0 O0m� -INg• 5" a:5,_ mO4Dm�N W DO ! C,,, m OCV) ZO (,/nn ;1:', rNm Z51 c7rn;O �- D m pr WED 4 f jJ 1,-,p,�:� Omp Di OGZ O O Z � - m w Z, m m DpO � rpO Z mr 0=a-_-+D �ymz 1 �Or �m DDINNm1lQmr% P ;.:-4.3) rd rtejC-01m % r!,,- ; nit 68 O7 V2'81 nmmmZ �OW zDi0r64�O nrN �C1Q� nm _, �N=n% qr,INZm U!Nr �rr0 80 mro ;1 ;r0 TPi (.) '0 D-DD 33 r- CpmO WO; gOrn r $: N nD0 mDm1 nOW i mD-I Nn DOr :, rE gr: co' FNO Z60O qC I 96 1 . � gvDm D;(1 n oq ':T1 �m� m mm , u -0 -�(N W W- -n2Srn Wz DrSm OO 1 Od OgO SAO �O O�- %i'z pZ- nD W m 8 O �UU, r r 0Jm mrn 8 1 Drp 8 o m53 0 � rDOmZ0� OS Z� m vmYn, • qlD�Rg D mr. 'nN N( m Dm oa 'D C d7 �Or (1;:cu. O ZONr i73 V9 -,7)7)'7--p9, 0 N rnn� D m Dx � o OW mD O Dzm rC W9 O- -�<v DDOZ ' Z '';',12. 'r' 2 m " mmv <m (1 0mZ "' vir4N tv,DR WSND r Z m -W A O N 1 mq C r O Ig0O , Z pmvO ma in-31 O D' A42 0 % :',3 Z NC N -' -( (fT,;,,IAaq IIf(poNOO O n O %1 'D q < m TV) = za � 2 vlwS rn>A-__,mO '; § : F Tg P ii Dr N NC :n O nN OOOmD n'N n ZD O N ,cN OD Z 1--- 'U � ZmP ttil!7 -5D � v3DO m1p c.�, LO 01 OF)':53 P':'i' { aN arD.- D � Ft' W =0 ( 1vmOm go � n D '4'1‹ OOO Z ddhDZ o�„ g `3m Zl' � o a 1:1; SD D O zm Cn r N ,m= N m • rn F. #,- f' g---,D m ONio (,3r-T3 mt rnP.A FR ZD MAgIll f.,, ?m z �IOD r n I IEv o N� � Fu.),,T1Afv m= N m� _C 4 N_ CO Cn c> O > 00 3J Pr- 8 o� D-- 0.- o II p z p orn p °±1 ��I' � O'� f'1:L) �i� N pm ZO c)). W c,---ITT-7'2i . 0) ()) N go. 0 @ m� Z D= z �_ v- pin 2 0 n N -< 2 UMPU- 2 O MUIWAIDTHAV mm A m rN-i-( (n r (n m FPz'Ir7INI nf1l� O D O = > p XX O D OC O Or 0 � m LI (7 '0'-( E 1 _1D mO OpD(n(n SSO � I yA -< N Z N N N Z Z D i.', D � � Z Z r*1 Z Z I �r _ m D •-i rn �p�Z A N Zm m m O O-( m z G7 m m m O m m G�G>D O G7 O z m!!H �Z O D n s m '1 -� 1 d o r d D Z d d O o o '1-� m i g o --- ' � � �� O-^ 1 cn Q-p D to m 1 •�D D -( m N z � r r1�ry z•� MB- g �v4 ��-7,- ; m r 0� Nni�z rn r c v by�� U' D� � ��l S D d-D�� m r ig �12A W(n� m(�• i't'`� ,,•. 90�o(n D O _.( Z rrrZ (A < n 1-iD� Z� �AD� <��m �) ZL7r�Dr Z0 0 Z � r n Z m D f*i p--i i 0�•`� •, �yOFG m A m >0 (D > Z D>>z 5 pz r D z Z'z m ,- m D-+ D (0 D<> w ! '' `,21 G7 Q Z ” 4 D O=r1 Z%m g Z r m(+1 m -t ge,17§ = 0 yOD Z R° y m 0-& -0 m Or rm It cn Z a g \ n v f D(n m -1 � Z !4) m[,)1 C _D- vso�II (j n " �NiDEm ilA ypA ,9, 1 NI IaDIV z mrm Dz mZ v rt ° ; r Pi A R-1) m _-LCnC I PJ Cm ,.iw g$ g �nl/ gi w 8 S.\OIOd5;0,'.ten:\e're�1SIp02.;..p,Ot:,9•'?SiQ?:J.1npS PN.it+,1.,:, E�Z g0 I , r'z D rn I or' � COD oO O d • . •,, ((s.•,.,!:1 '3!G it :i.viE.CEn.A.-0 O 0 1T IS a I .' NU'! E zI.. `I. �s �o�'�.:��ar�,�a�ar�s-.--- ! �,:`� !xl m( !: �rn <NI13 P a16405fT.�1.1 <,. '�'IBLa►a + a^T_IY• Ii`°r' J� 1 1 NDm cam•7a "l — �s.v"�s '� �- ./7--- --7---01114-111w, ___, : + �_1^r 7-- c, -,., -2. ] ' 4.1,11T ' _Lei / :ilk__ ____!1 ,I- 7. _ ..___,<,A. .,,,,\,,s , ,,,,, --r... \ co -�`it D1 n c I a;g , I 1 F -VI i._ L ---\ ' U, vN ,, 1 i II m _m \ H c• ,r-,D:'• . n rn Cr ' Cp-Di ,-,,,-• mob II�o -•it OU -II OO !I C II'7G•'."tii.b � N�`"; + i I! F� .Com 1 Q `,,,1,1,;) II g.w.I N o w;l Er1 c,,II -P: :i W II G IY !'r i1�7 / I-wN� 1aWN ,,,N. -r.WN�tI. iWW .iG,.WN 1 � illil iii'.,``, �� �t p w0 G:O "G,[7.'t w- NrJ \ p m ! j [o ID - —v� S•r111 1 1 O J.�� �J `t»�t 5N,i l,, >> ��11 J9°*i Is I I` <� j ill i ',1 2,, 1 t lz _ `:. •r I. I r 1 1� - \ '-7-*- _5' `i 5' ''° 45\ I" 1- • '-.% I a U 6--i,. \\:,+1 ''' \', 0 In ;)`, E'; itr. r� ��arra-.74•�- -�"•,�JA� �� ,•0 't 1'1 ',, ''}` 1111`\,\:1.j1 l iv N ,1313 L !O' ,1,11 ,i _A /� r �I� �� ��o.ss�:•, cn� ga-o�_")i 20.567. a-�(��! i III i' -1,.'''''64 � � A„ ,� , i ' En?w 1,7)'=,z m !. �!1� I'IN STREET'A'�s255 I_Fo PVA j®515° U�: ,' \ Ii � � s � _ki , a � _ ` I I < I � iv �(pr> ,09 45'6 43- \ �t•w� ��'�� ' � \4 1 A 0. W '-�, ',2.. _ _Z JI ro+© �r1`� iI INO 1 f'rl •T.T1 . a ci -p..•. /l it I�53 1 yp+.Z7 Q CA Z ' NI '�W °w ♦, t N •,�O,T 411 I 8 r1D C7) � �'� n•'��; I �W ��� '•/'�\j'��t � � .,°�����: �,n0�• ,��.D O H` I rn _ �, v\j W n•v ��„iiiii���� ~I I \1 (b Qfl N(b J _... O \O �7-D(n O •TC-DN o'-m„-,,,,,g,)_ � A.'�0:. i; •,`....�"/ � ., � w \ -CO---. T\ {{�,,�!�, � cn �) :s,�,DCS -,I.� �/� / ��I o co a 0 ii. I^oma rill H pl 00 a )r/;: '35� lam, �,o° t I'•i'i^ t`I I ‘, \1 Z7 ,D I aWNO .'W•n nWp -��'� � 1 I i:,,,, /p, - 1 �... /,/j:' 11 'I j �� J• 11••I i i I'\'1+`' 1 .. 6:vg pc,,,._,(4. - IroNo o v. u, r•_,O^:On Ir•. ,r _01_ I �� ;Ii _ , 1, i-,-,-„,,,..., _ :\Dc'T, �, ' I O I 1 1 i t}S-'_ ( 1�irl I . o r-, C^N -iDc, :;21';,-,-,> �o r,::-; , \ CSI n ,� \ (, 1 i 11 II r ..... .8%I.OG,-' -',.,7--'1- L., ,i'7'1 '-\ { !! I I �:9 N Z1: \ \ CEJ , =� (v _.�_ wn('I,,,L�G.N-+' ;.,+ ^(n i.1'` ���j +1 `I -- .I U` '1 i �- I Tij i 'i.l t IZ<�-'- `"O--1 3�-•` 'r�-1 <' -; Ham} _:v”,+ '\ - _' - ' I 1 ' I c I , i 4 ,�G-11 - I -' I ` - ,-;,,,E32,-,,2 C 1 — 'I'l ar., t-, ,,•:■ Ipa /`/`1, ��/ ,,,'.t .;\...:-,....,‘-. ':....:,.1 ' 1 ,, f*1 c �S `i. k5"' S ,.._ I ! 1 •-G7:C1�' 1 l O 11,`1 1 i} 1' \ \ \\ \ \ N���N�D 1 9..0', �' •c: •• N O 66 - `'- o q:4 C„ H^.`` ` N O D L 3 1 r ,,,„_ C M O t 000iig5 a ,,,,,,,;,,,5,,.. ,.. r s \ 1*t cfl II► `jiiri,,,,,t,16,47._ :.,:siTREET:c.o_177.....,±4.7.7v_,114;k";-----�� � 'C) '`o ,IIIAJ ; LF g , 2.. t Ii�c,,�' �► •� PV �4• ���. .�� \ �,\ 1 �,,\ '�013 co iv cnN P °' -{ % ,r �, PER` 1 ' t \ .\,\'+\\ \\\1.P iv-•u'iv n u,-�f II\� J �, !/�. '�'• �'� UC�SED �f ` \ ; ,\,„ �. \ ,\ I ,,, 1.1D I�� 1 ,,,) \ `,t, , ,,J N-•- r nati ')va \' \ �' /��� E p5sC�RpE \ \\\\\ ,1w r,, I ! 1 ..ti4 hD9 \\.\ ;'•cn ,� ',L 0 -,,1 'ET 8.11, \: \\ \ \-"' /fir, �' ,_ A 1500, , \'1' 1'1, `1 1 l ,© "-.D U,DA , D-II Ir -N 46- ''Wz"T2 `V O l + ' \� ? \ '\\\\,,, 1+'')\\ *\ III f�Cl,WJrnN C7 z• 1\•�"-' O (.-,:_;,:;51,01 �cPO J QQ7 N �•1,1,1';, ,�,� \� � j k� �\�1\•` ''yi. „ O Oo i • - , J W II i),- W J(J, 1 \V-W l \\.\\\ \ \ , .\ J I7o, -1 (.J H :t-�.p CO;�:' '�+ ,�.\ \':'\ 0\\\,,,,,.‘‘,.: ao(n N�•^,=O N g )\< J JN � v'a0 � mDN (off t � V1 I \\\\0\\Y/\\\ 1,, / \ i1 \ I1 \''' I'\ rnm I`y J II -----__ u,wN`+l - J 1 1 \ \ yy� \ rI0 1 , / * i •UA `w �,�0 , „ ',\ 1a \\\\ 1,\ ,\ '\\\\ i\` z ' o t\y m gh TH / a® 'W't mDJ Nq X ', \t\'\ 1 \1 \. �! rn l 11 i �,1 ' , m Z i \ 1 ` 1',1` 1 \,�� 1 i / 6Nrn 1 T�, m o \ \ P,, 1 �, 1\\\\ r'(�,•., *07 _. 0811 $ J z N N z z= �.y n C :Li. CF1r\`. / 30.2'.45,4 4' 1 ,2 m \ 1 1 1`` \ W��wcno t) • ,S/ ^ , N lk 1'E 8.1•1, 4 `oz \' )))\\\ \ `\`, N W N W O ��• • •.h/p/�q a s11 46g•4 j,5 1 1 m \\ 4, 1 , 1 o ' .A SE o ' o 013 woNW n AD 1Y,2. u 1 \ 1 'CO.,CT Cn N N D / ”V to Fii 1 - \ \ **gym*� ' / ` cRAY \\, ,�1 \ r, 1 I e_ DER co / .o2Nor-' / ,, \ ) PG•4 �� 1'P ' 800Woorn Srmic5-5/c /�/ / �> \ m L'�RiI,9` p / .m \ \ D A ro \ II \ u, -----------„....,„„,„ y r D r /V / Nz II 0. O±, wi 0 09 m� n Om ZO D yo_•I (n G7 •ir O 3>irn / r N CSN ,Z O 000 O 0 ©CIO 09 0 0 0 8088G5 I T- D� Ov o'--1 ' N N! Z- o�o DDnmoA zoU aOra�?Ox-,x13� N N mmDzi (m, mOC<nUrN O<�-§_':"8')- §r'N?r? D o 0 ZZ omD @ O ?r-J 6 Z � ZC , Og-�-O JP Z�N0O y m -C(),An q,N W mOc 0ZNn l � O CmmO ��D3A Om0 �n2O . .f�)D 33mD-ivC 'DC�rrDF-:°-- 0 00 T1 - . O m I Dm�f*'U,- or .0—,elZ U, m'I N7Z'N�m �-p Z� Z n ° X0 l y Oowe�O r _� \9 2 0O, O • mZmmZ : ON C rn r� P � � ',�4_cr^, � O r- m r p ����'�Po m n n 5�r)O m �-,rot-, I�' I\m fN�*)6"g -5‹ Z2 /V) '$ n c'),�,f- O m � mt7cr) )n�Om.�on1 m,,7-„iE. m, q rtril � m O N -r3 rn A \\-,,,r11 •`� On N �NN51 o��1mZ NiINCI � ,�O�Oi; m II Z mC4' N o -, o7, �re,,,-rN n ''m- o me I' c)DD rDN Wc -, Q, ON N\ -i?m ZZ m �p^ Fi Om Hr'3;Pi 13 N i A I T4 m� m zO ��N 8m Wm O-.O fl' mrNOm Z m � O< O<NO N8 Dr(Q(2) arel On !s,j m -ID ii: o�O0 mZmZ Z N O,5 -+ZO `= z o 0 O W-1 v 31W E mm D rl �z O R g O_o O w. CT O� Tl .°-'< GI XfO O -i m I. y xi1 iir,',>. IJ!t D1 mza -i �I � rn r5_ym s I.•//Y � � IJty / r,,.... 'j 0 n O ;a _�N 1 0 .. • r c cn co )1), MI %)4 , ,. ,s, �- • I Q r 1 ^'- i- 6 -DI 1 z:;:0 I t7\ fTl D li, D r D �� _q � \ Z Wn <f Ao,y� N .A. �w i= N Iy---,^, D a 16 a O 1.+i,t VARIES D q. D n j{ a I-ri 68.5-20.5' — -�-rt) N n 'a s I� a ,v fT1 s !i—--—,, O iii. —I �rn i U) Zn v na� , � /; 1 51 mJJJ 1r;3Nr_-.0-6 ODO N) 0 OCZf 'DX i .O Gii, N C-I 8mrn 1 I (zv'��nI "Z / —1w ,�i c' n m Zn ''':g1"- ;'-n "- om It r rD-�Opc 4 N i 1====‘)r- O �D • 8 e ,.....r.:,/ ,.-'5, '\moi `I n r t --,, .,',SIP ;:;) .,...---i , .' z:-.., ',o O v D ;.,•_n I* i 17 MIN `J' 1 (/� /,, , Z rc-.5 .: U? D V1 1 J it v o SCJ o -I --- /•,rc 1 TD Z f A m w m v m 'r- mW I OZ + II v Zc l''' cri � � OZ O r" D .: 170 Z •� r D D' m 0 Orn II ' 0_ rn r O - T to I *F. 41 rn m z 7, ', v Dz . f';;' v, \ N o mZ* A � vrg wrrv_ �g N N // , m0o0 mn%1D 2 mD mm (3T, W m Vial'2' m 4n r3,31 Z N W ii,iri Oa�(D O D c - IL A£\ W j 0 0 Dr\N CO N Cn�.I � ti3 O - -`ja(D V W lyl Z Xr` TC., 1-- N vO c ° ___,1,,,,, '1� r:s A x EDGE PVMT , mG)n T N.l--R 2 D rn a-r Q2< rDrn 1 8 g. O 0�' O FACe r �v= m- �� o, o i cl rnnvwO(n Pl1-9 rxi m U o D D -itri D r ACD01 V � D cn C7N --(:<) nz (-) rnO. rn =1Z v ! m �� n 1,,,,, o " _ -0 OD I , Z -C C , •°I V z Z Z 11111 N N p Si - 2 W W { N 2 x 1111 `c(1)-----f, 1 () J, .\ ao p(7 `\ .,<i L.E --- ° 'N, ;-m D� ,>n y� -tr . 4,7"_R.�, rte- � �r r4"\ h2" , A r ,� \ 'f' m I Z DOA D Z m ' m i rz n O T 4y -1 '1N\.T ..\ ,i \rr �TO m 03rO) Q N p n _ 1 Prov D w - rnD On A�oA§v (Ai' D� 91 m W TOWN OF ORO VALLEY [ 6 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: April 17, 2002 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Robert Conant, Planner II SUBJECT: OV12-00-07, EXTENSION OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE RITZ- CARLTON RESORT AT STONE CANYON BEING A PORTION OF THE 54.49 ACRE SITE FOR 20 CONDOMINIUMS (9.64 ACRES) AND 23 VILLAS (7.92 ACRES), LOCATED NORTHWEST OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD OFF TORTOLITA MOUNTAIN DRIVE,PARCELS 219-050-10B,219-191-96C AND 219-200-02B BACKGROUND: On April 18, 2001, the Town Council approved the Preliminary Plat for 23 villa lots on 7.92 acres and 20 condominium units on 9.64 acres, which are portions of the 54.49-acre site of the Ritz-Carlton Resort at Stone Canyon. The Town Council approved an extension of the Preliminary Plat for six months on November 7, 2001; the Plat will expire on April 18, 2002. On March 20, 2002 the Town Council adopted Ordinance (0) 02- 09 allowing for additional extensions of Preliminary Plats, in six (6) month increments not to exceed an aggregate of eighteen (18) months. SUMMARY: The resort itself is not subject to the request for extension. The extension affects only the Preliminary Plats for the 20 for sale condominiums and 23 villas. The main resort building and associated casitas were approved by a Development Plan, which has a life of two years. The Development Plan will expire in April 2003; however, improvement plans for the entire site are being prepared by the owner and if approved by the Town, and construction of improvements commences prior to April 2003 the Development Plan remains in place. The Athens Group, who are the developers of the Ritz-Carlton Resort, has submitted a letter requesting the extension (letter attached). The extension is requested for the following reasons: • The condominium Final Plat will be an as-built drawing. These units will be constructed with the main hotel building. • The plat for the Villas is still in design as are the units and a few lots may be lost due to the design of the villas. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Town Council extent the Ritz-Carlton Preliminary Plat for a period of six months to October 18, 2002. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 2 SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to extend OV 12-00-07 Preliminary Plat for the Ritz-Carlton Resort at Stone Canyon for a period of six months to October 18, 2002. Attachments: Letter of request 1 j:st/L.....‘ Ritz-C7 lton Project \ aer '�J i al Planning n i Z ing Administrator t I Co.- , u''; Deve ent Director Town Manag 05/27/02 14:16 15`1 210 735 9791 THE ATHENS GROUP a 002 The Athens Group March 27, 2002 Mr. Bob Conant,Planner Town of Oro Valley Community Development 11000 N. La Canada Oro Valley, AZ 85737 Re: Ritz-Carlton Stone Canyon Preliminary Plat Approvals OV12-00-07 Dear Mr. Conant; The Athens Group respectfully requests the Town Council to take action to extend the Preliminary Plat approval for the Condominiums and Villas on the Ritz--Carlton Project as the approved on April 18, 2001 at your next regularly scheduled meeting. In advance,thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, THE ATHENS GROUP bil2S1434184 Corky Ingraham Vice President Cc: Roger Lovstrom File 13626 Hidden Springs Drive Oro Valley,Arizona 85737 520/877-8646 . FAX 520/877-8638 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 7 COUNCIL COMMUN ICATION MEETING DATE: April 17, 2002 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Melissa Shaw, AICP, Project Manager SUBJECT: MODIFIC ATION TO THE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE 2020 SCHEDULE AND STATUS REPORT #5 BACKGROUND: An update to Oro Valley's General Plan was initiated in June 2001. The purpose of the update is both to 'n Smarter/Plus statutoryrequirements and to account for changes in demographics, economic meet Growing q and other characteristics of the Town since the current plan, Focus 2020, was adopted in 1996. The purpose of this report is to inform the Council of the activities and status of the Update 2020 project, and to propose a new project schedule. SUMMARY: February thru March Activities and Implementation. The following a is of the activities and PPAP implementation since February: summary • Citizen comment database. Over 100 comments have been received to date from the website. All comments are entered into a database that is linked directly from web site and are viewable "on-line." See www.update2020.com. • Maps. A wide varietyof are beingproduced for this project. A complete listing of all the maps maps p and related data is available in the Planning Department. February • Newsletter. In early2002, newsletter #1 was distributed to the approximately 12,000 Oro Valley households on the Water Utilitymailing list; to the General Plan database list, including business owners; provided to apartment complex managers for distribution; and distributed as hand p "Road Show" presentations. A second newsletter will be produced and distributed to outs during inform thoseproject in the ro ect database the results of the Topic Focus Group meetings, and the three land use map alternatives. • Public TelephonevSummary Survey. A final Report has been completed and is available on the web site. Bureau. Over the last several months approximately 30 • Speakers "road show" presentations to HOAs, apartment groups and a PTO have been made by staff with Steering Committee members. Several more are scheduled through April 2002. • Steering Committee. The Committee will hold their 10th meeting on April 8, 2002. During the meetings heldupdate since the last report, the Committee reviewed, developed and substantially completed a recommendation for the major amendment definition; reviewed, critiqued and participated in the Topic Focus Groupexercises; and have begun to review land use map alternatives. The Committee also heard apresentation bythe Water Utility Director regarding water resources. Steering Committee members are also participating in road show presentations. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 4 • Technical Advisory Committee. The Technical Committee has been apprised of the status of the Oro Valley General Plan planning process, and comment and guidance requested during their meetings. This Committee has reviewedpublicsurvey,the discussed implementation plan scheduling, major projection issues; Sonoran Desert Conservation Plan status; amendment definitions; population The legislative updates, and will review the land use map alternatives and evaluation methodology third meeting is scheduled for April 8, 2002. g Focus Groupmeetings have been held, beginning on February 13 and • Topic Focus Groups. Five Topic ending on March 25, 2002. The Focus Grouptopics ranged from Natural Resources and Environment Services to CommunityDesignand Land Use Alternatives. Approximately to Circulation and Public ed the first meeting, and over 90 the final meeting. Summaries of the meetings are 35 people attend being complied and will be distributed and posted on the web site. p • Web Site. General Plan site is completep and updated weekly. The web site is current, comprehensive produced for the plan update are available on line. See either and many of the documents www.townoforovalley.com or www.update2020.com. A summary of the Public Participation ation Action Plan, with the implementation status of each activity to date activities is provided in Table 2. A "Public Participation Action Plan and a summary of future Implementation Diary" is maintainedPlanning in the Department, which is a record of events that p documents and describes the implementation of public participation events and techniques. Project Schedule. le was developed when, throughout the State, the new Growing Smarter/Plus The current project schedu p requirements were being interpreted requiring voter ratification by the end of December 2002. The rp as q g intent of the statute has since been clarified such that updated general plans must be adopted by the Council by the end of 2002, but need not be ratified by the voters until a later, unspecified date. Staff is proposing extending the schedule to allow for adoption by the end of 2002 and voter ratification in March 2003, in order to: • Allow an additional time (2 weeks) for Staff review of the land use alternatives and draft plan. The current schedule provides onlyone week for staff review prior to sending it out for the mandated 60- day agency review period. for SteeringCommittee, Planning and Zoning Commission, and Town Council • Allow additional time review of the Vision Statement, initiating Alternative, and Draft Plan prior to the mandated 60-day agency review period. The current schedule allows approximately one week for the to review the plan in its entirety, prior to distributing for the required 60-day Commission and Council agency review period. • Hold Council adoption tion in the Fall 2002, when the Town's seasonal population is back in residence. most of the review and public hearings are scheduled during the 60 day review In the current schedule period. Table 1 shows the current schedule is compared to the proposed schedule: TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 3 of 4 TABLE 1 Milestone Current Schedule Proposed Schedule Goals, Objectives,ectives and MayOpen House and May Open House and Vision, � � Preferred Alternative Study Session Study Session May Commission Hearing June Council Hearing Draft Elements/Plan MayOpen House and May Commission Hearing Study Session June Council Hearing Public Review Draft Plan MayOpen House and June Commission Hearing Study Session June Council Hearing 60-dayReview May to July July to September p Draft Implementation Plan* During 60 day review During 60 day review Public Hearings During 60 day review October and November Town Council Adoption July November Ratification Election November 2002 March 2003 *Develop as a separate document for yearly review/update. deadline would require modification of the consultant contract to both extend Extending the ratification q to approve additional funds not to exceed $10,000 to account for additional meetings their deadline and pp and work associated with additional review and other efforts enabled by the four-month extension of the schedule. The Scope of Work will remain unchanged. RECOMMENDATION: additional review period an extended project schedule would permit, planning staff In consideration of the recommends thatapprove the Council changing the project deadline from voter ratification in November g 2002 to voter ratification in March 2003. SUGGESTED MOTION: extendingthe General Plan Update 2020 project schedule from voter ratification in I move to approve November 2002 to March 2003 with the associated deadline changes, and authorization to expend additional funds not to exceed $10,000. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY OUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 4 of 4 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Table 2,PPAP Implementation Status 2. Community Survey Results Report Planninirg oning Administrator 71A00,4"))r";(1,...., Community Development Director / Town Manage F:\PROJECTS\GP2001\Staff Reports\Status Report#5 to TC.doc Table 2 Public Participation Action Plan Technique Summary Technique Comments/Description Implementation Status Future Activities as of 4/1/02 Steering Committee approved by Meeting#10 will be held on Meeting#11 to be scheduled. Committee Council 9/19/01. 4/8/02. Total number of 10 meetings Steering Committee meetings will exceed ten. Technicalapprovedby Committee Third meetings will be 4/8/02. Meeting#4 to be scheduled. Advisory Council 9/19/01. Committee 5 meetings Sector Boards* Technique changed. Two sector board meetings None scheduled. '.-._ Twenty-one meetings were held for all 7 boards, 2 initially planned will not representatives recommended be scheduled. Topic for Steering Committee. Focus Groups meetings Approved Steering Committee will be implemented. does not include representatives from the former Sector Boards. Boards and To be scheduled DRB member and Planning Public hearings,DRB and Commissions throughout the process. Commissioner appointed to Board of Adjustment updates to Steering Committee. be scheduled. Presentation for PRAB held October 25, 2001. Leadership 20 anticipated. 5 leadership and 9 department Interviews complete. Interviews interviews conducted. Topic Focus Five topic focus groups Complete. Summaries being compiled and Groups(5) will be held to discuss • Natural Resources& will be distributed and posted specific issues and areas. Environment: 2/13/02 on the web site. • Circulation/Public Svcs: 2/25/02 • Parks,Rec&Culture: 2/26/02 • Land Use: 3/4/02 • Alternative Selection& Community Design: 3/25/02 Future Search The ultimate goal is to Held October 27, 2001. Over A summary report is complete. Conference include all stakeholders 120 participants attended. Draft vision statement and topic who will be affected by Conference consisted of focus issues will be prepared. how the community presentations &panel grows or who can affect discussion in morning, and the community in the work sessions in afternoon. future. Open Houses (3) During 3 public open To be scheduled. Will be held prior to joint houses, will present P&Z/Town Council study vision statement, session on alternatives (tent. alternatives, and draft 4/29/02). Also to be scheduled: elements. 1 topic focus open house to present draft elements. Landowner/ Technique was changed. _ Large property owners(18 Conduct interviews with large q _ Technique Comments/Description Implementation Status Future Activities as of 4/1/02 Developer Forum* Will be combined with acres and more)were property owners/developers. Topic Focus Group on identified and notified of the Land Use Patterns, 3/25/02 Focus Group meeting Housing&Economic to discuss land use Development. alternatives. Several Interviews with large individual meetings with large property property owners have been owners/developers held to discuss the General Plan process, and special requests are being submitted for the Steering Committee to review. Public Hearings Six meetings to adopt To be scheduled. To be scheduled at key points g vision statement& in the process. 1st&2nd to select preferred adopt vision statement: P&Z alternative, in addition to 4/2/02 &Council 4/17/02, 3rd& final plan adoption. 4th to adopt preferred alternative: P&Z 5/7/02 & Council 6/5/02; 5th& 6th to adopt final plan: P&Z 6/25/02 &Council 7/10/02. Random Sample Statistically valid Survey is complete. Final Survey will be used to help Survey telephone survey will be survey results available for develop issue identification, conducted to assess review. goals and policies. May be community position on used"informally" on web site, key issues. and as a handout. Informal Surveys Will utilize questions No action to date. See above. Follow up from formal survey questions to formal survey may during events and on the be developed. web site. Project Database Compile databases of Current database has over 500 An ongoing process. Databases interested citizens, entries of interested citizens and mailing lists are business, stakeholders and other groups. See continuously updated. and other groups to Implementation Diary, Citizen notify of meetings and Comment database and hearings. databases of interested citizens and groups. Storyboarding A public facilitation Utilized during Future Search. Will be continued throughout technique. the process. Project Web Will inform of Web site is complete. Project Public comment format and Page/E-Mail upcoming events and is on front page of Town of related database complete and progress to date,plus Oro Valley website and links functional. Updates are will accept direct public to: www.update2020.com. . continuous. comment via comment form. Project Newsletter Will inform persons First newsletter mailed early Second newsletter to report the (3) subscribing to mailing February, 2002. results of the Topic Focus list of upcoming events Group meetings, and the three and progress to date. land use map alternatives. Anticipated distribution May, 2002 (end of January, 2002). Technical Reports Background Technical Findings of Background Final copy for public review (3) Report, Alternatives Technical Report reported prepared by the end of April. Revised 4/4/02 2 Technique Comments/Description Implementation Status Future Activities as of 4/1/02 Evaluation Report,Draft during Focus Group meetings. Implementation Report. Report review and editing in progress. Press To inform media of Several major newspaper Ongoing. Press releases will be Communications upcoming events. articles covering General Plan issued throughout process. update issued to date. Youth Forum* Will develop curriculum Youth Forum scheduled for Will report results of the youth as "mini"citizen April 13, 2002. Two youths, forum to Steering Committee planning institute and one from Ironwood HS and and Council.. conduct on yearly basis one from CDO HS appointed in schools. to Steering Committee and will inform classmates of the 4/13 forum. Citizen Planning Popular yearly class for Class began 10/18/01. Complete/. Institute* citizens that teaches Schedule includes intensive "Planning A-Z". General Plan coverage. Class attended October 27,Future Search Conference; November 1 and December class focused on General Plan. Community Walk Deleted due to time and Deleted due to time and staff This technique will be partially Abouts.* staff constraints. constraints implemented through Steering Committee field trips that will be conducted throughout Town. When possible neighbors will be invited to attend. Community A catalogue of slides No action to date. Staff is evaluating the Characteristics depicting various aspects feasibility of including this Preference Survey of the physical technique with the 5th Topic environment of the Focus Group,where land use community and is alternatives will be discussed utilized for scoring purposes. _ Planning Lecture Deleted due to time and Deleted due to time and staff None. Series* staff constraints. constraints. Partnering with Utilize planned events to Joined with Naranja Town Site Will continue to partner with Community tag onto and project volunteers during Oro other events as opportunities Events disseminate/gather Valley Jazz&Music Festival arise, such as the GOVAC interest in General Plan. Oct. 20, 2001 &March 15 & concert series for flyer 16, 2002; invited GP Topic distribution. Focus Groups to attend NTS design charette (1/7/02); took "mobile display"to event with sign up sheets; scheduled presentations during HOA annual meetings. Revised 4/4/02 3 Technique Comments/Description Implementation Status Future Activities as of 4/1/02 Speakers Bureau Informational Six informational Will be ongoing and will presentations on presentations to civic groups. include presentations to PTO planning process to civic Has also been developed into a groups. clubs. "road show"of informational presentations to HOA's and apartment groups. Thirty two scheduled thru April,2002. Steering Committee members attend meetings. TravelingMobile Information on process See speakers bureau. Will be ongoing; Display (maps,posters, comment Presentation board developed forms & surveys) at for the "road show" and will various high traffic be displayed at key locations locations around Town throughout Town;took during the project. "mobile display"to NTS design charette with sign up sheets and to Jazz&Music Festival. *Revised June 28, 2001 by Town Council. F:\PROJECTS\GP2001\Status&Implementation Report\Implementation Table 1.doc Revised 4/4/02 4 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE 2020 Community Survey Results Report March 29, 2002 Executive Summary 1 Community Values&Vision 1 Preservation of Open Space and Scenic Views 1 Traffic Congestion 1 Water Resources 1 Development of Vacant or Undeveloped Land 1 Economic Development 2 1.0 Introduction 3 1.1 Background and Methodology 3 1.2 Demographics 3 2.0 Community Values&Vision 5 2.1 "Likes" and "Dislikes"of Living in Oro Valley 5 2.1.1 Like Most 5 2.1.2 Like Least 7 2.2 Oro Valley Growth 8 3.0 Preservation of Open Space and Scenic Views 9 4.0 Traffic Congestion 11 5.0 Water Resources 13 6.0 Growth Areas and Land Use 14 6.1 Use of Undeveloped or Vacant Land 14 6.2 Housing Development Options 16 6.3 Commercial Development 17 6.4 Parks and Recreation Services 18 7.0 Economic Development 20 7.1 Employment Opportunities 20 7.2 Revenue Options 22 } �Fl Oro Valley General Plan Community Survey Results Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Town of Oro Valley, through its consulting firm BRW, commissioned WestGroup Research of Phoenix to conduct a telephone survey of Oro Valley residents. The purpose of the survey was to gain insights into community attitudes and opinions particularly as they relate to the growth and development of Oro Valley. The interviews were conducted during January of 2002 from WestGroup's Interviewing Center in Phoenix. A total of 403 interviews were completed. At 95 percent confidence, the statistical error limits are plus or minus 5%. COMMUNITY VALUES&VISION • Residents like living in Oro Valley for a variety of reasons but most often mention an appreciation for scenery and beauty (25%), the "rural feeling" and open space (18%), and its safety and security (16%). The three main complaints about living in Oro Valley are the traffic (20%), rapid growth (18%), and the distance and lack of services(13%). • Residents are split in their perception of Oro Valley's growth; half feel it is growing "too much" (47%) and the other half feel its growth is "about right" (46%) or"too little" (2%). PRESERVATION OF OPEN SPACE AND SCENIC VIEWS • Approximately two-thirds of residents feel scenic views in Oro Valley have been preserved well (65% excellent + good), however fewer than one-half feel natural, undeveloped open space in Oro Valley has been preserved well (45%excellent + good). TRAFFIC CONGESTION • Five in seven residents (71%) believe traffic congestion is a problem in Oro Valley. A vast majority (92%) of those who feel traffic congestion is a problem in Oro Valley support efforts to improve traffic flow by synchronizing lights and widening roads. Residents are also largely supportive of providing more opportunities for biking and walking(84%) Support is somewhat weaker for promoting access to existing freeways and corridors in and outside Oro Valley (79%) and for providing more mass transit services (71%). WATER RESOURCES • Nearly all residents are supportive of using water conservation efforts and recycling household water to ensure an adequate supply of water for the future (94% and 93% strongly support or support, respectively). Although support is slightly weaker, a majority of residents also support the development and use of alternative water resources and limiting growth (82%and 76%). DEVELOPMENT OF VACANT OR UNDEVELOPED LAND • A majority of residents support using undeveloped or vacant land in Oro Valley for parks, undisturbed open space, and/or for schools or educational facilities (91%, 87%, and 84%, respectively either "strongly support"or"support"these options). Although support is considerably weaker, more than half support retail, business, and residential development of vacant land (58%, 53%and 53%). • A majority of residents are supportive of developing single-family homes with at least one-acre lots (85% strongly + support). Nearly two-thirds (64%) indicate they are supportive of single-family subdivisions with smaller lots. Support for the development of apartments, condominiums, and townhouses is significantly lower(31%). • When asked to prioritize the development of additional commercial and retail services, very few residents felt any of the proposed business developments were a "high priority" (11% to 13%). In fact, 1 Oro Valley General Plan Community Survey Results Report fewer than half of residents ranked any of the options as a "medium" or "high" priority. Residents were most likely to feel developing small community shopping centers and neighborhood shopping centers should be a priority (49% and 48%, medium + high priority). Considerably fewer indicated major shopping centers are important(37%). • A vast majority (90%) of residents feel open space and nature preserves should be a priority for Oro Valley. Most residents also consider the development of trails and multi-use paths (88%), small neighborhood parks and playgrounds (83%), parks with recreation opportunities (80%), and a multi-use center with meeting rooms and a community center, and cultural and performing arts area to be a priority(74%). Very few residents feel a municipal golf course is needed (34%). ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT • Residents are most likely to feel Oro Valley should place a priority on developing employment opportunities in the medical and health care fields (85%). Two-thirds (66%) feel small job opportunities centered in professional office complexes should be a medium or high priority. Fewer feel jobs in research and technical parks should be a priority (59%) and approximately half (51%) rate the development of hotel and resort jobs as a priority. Residents are least likely to think light industry and manufacturing employment opportunities should be developed (32%). • Residents are most supportive of increasing development fees as a way to generate additional revenue for the city(74%support). Nearly three in five (57%) support additional annexation as a revenue source. Increased commercial development finds support from slightly less than half of residents (47%). Very few residents support an increased sales tax, a personal property tax, or the reduction of town services (30%, 22%and 18%, respectively). 2 Oro Valley General Plan Community Survey Results Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND AND METHODOLOGY The Town of Oro Valley, through its consulting firm BRW, commissioned WestGroup Research of Phoenix to conduct a telephone survey of Oro Valley residents. The purpose of the survey was to gain insights into community attitudes and opinions particularly as they relate to the growth and development of Oro Valley. Data for the Town of Oro Valley study were gathered using a sample drawn through random digit dialing. The sample consists of 403 completed interviews with Oro Valley citizens. Participants were screened to meet gender and age quotas. The interviews were conducted during January of 2002 from WestGroup's Interviewing Center in Phoenix. At 95 percent confidence,the statistical error limits are plus or minus 5%. 1.2 DEMOGRAPHICS Table 1 summarizes the demographic characteristics of the residents interviewed as part of this survey. Some interesting statistics about the sample include the following: • The average age of respondents is 55 years. • On average, respondents have lived in Oro Valley for seven years. • Approximately one in ten work in Oro Valley. • One in four have visited the Oro Valley website. t cf r ;c 3 Oro Valley General Plan Community Survey Results Report Table 1: Respondent Demographics %Respondents %Respondents Characteristic _ (n=403) Characteristic (n=403) Gender Years in Oro Valley Male 50% Less than 3 22% Female 50 3-5 19 5-10 37 Age More than 10 21 18 to 44 24% Average years 7.1 years 45to64 34 65 + 39 Residency in Oro Valley Average age 55 years More than 6 months/year 88% Less than 6 months/year 8 Ages in Household Don't know/no answer 4 (excluding respondent) Under 5 9% Work in Oro Valley 5to18 22 Yes 11% 19 to 44 24 No 86 45 to 64 35 Don't know/no answer 3 65 and over 35 Visited Oro Valley website Someone with Disability in 10% Household (n=42) Yes 25% Mobility 57% No 72 Sight 10 Don't know/no answer 3 Hearing 10 Mental 5 Respiratory/asthma 5 Arthritis 2 Heart/cardiac 2 Other 5 Refused 5 r< 4 Oro Valley General Plan Community Survey Results Report 2.0 COMMUNITY VALUES &VISION 2.1 "LIKES"AND"DISLIKES"OF LIVING IN ORO VALLEY 2.1.1 Like Most Residents like living in Oro Valley for a variety of reasons but most often mention an appreciation for scenery and beauty (25%), the "rural feeling" and open space (18%), and its safety and security (16%). One in ten like that it's peaceful and quiet(10%). A complete list of positive attributes appears on the following page. Women are significantly more likely than men to indicate the scenery is what they most appreciate about Oro Valley (31% vs. 20%). Safety is more often mentioned among those with household members forty- four years old and younger(28%vs. 13%of those 45 and older). The things I like most about living in Oro Valley are... Top 10 Mentions NET Scenery/beauty 25% NET Rural Setting 18 (small town,open spaces,etc.) Safety/lack of crime/security 16% Peaceful/quiet 10% Community/neighborhood 6% Police Department 6% Climate/weather 6% Clean(streets,air,water) 6% TheP Peo le/friendliness 6% Location 5% n=403 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 5 Oro Valley General Plan Community Survey Results Report Table 2: Likes about Oro Valley Total Responses (n=403) NET Scenery/beautiful/mountains 25% The view/scenery 10 Mountains/Catalina's 8 Pretty/beautiful 7 NET Rural Setting 18% Small town/population/rural feeling 7 Wide-open spaces/not crowded 6 Away from city/Tucson 5 Safety/lack of crime/security 16% Peaceful/quiet 10 Community/neighborhood 6 Police Department 6 Climate/weather 6 Clean (streets,air,water) 6 The people/friendliness 6 Location 5 Great place to live/nice area 4 Convenient/close to everything 4 Schools 3 The desert 3 New city/very organized/planned community 2 Building restrictions 2 Hiking and biking paths 1 Government 1 Less traffic 1 Growth 1 Privacy 1 Lifestyle/quality of living 1 Taxes are low 1 Parks 1 Other 7 Nothing 2 Don't know 3 Table 2: Please complete the following sentence in three or four words: The things I like most about living in Oro Valley are.... 6 Oro Valley General Plan Community Survey Results Report 2.1.2 Like Least The three main complaints about living in Oro Valley are the traffic (20%), rapid growth (18%), and the distance and lack of services (13%). Growth issues are of particular concern to long-time residents (25%vs. 9% of those in the area for 5 years or less) and to those who feel the town has grown too much (30% vs. 7% of those feel growth is on track). In contrast, newer residents (5 years or less) and those who feel growth is about right or too little are significantly more likely to dislike the distance from services (22% and 16%vs. 6%an 9%, respectively). It is important to note that nearly one in four residents could not think of anything they disliked about living in Oro Valley(14% none + 10% "don't know"). Table 3: Dislikes about Oro Valley Total Responses (n=403) Traffic 20% NET Concern over Rapid Growth 18% Growth/growing too fast/increase in population 12 Too much commercial development/developers 6 NET Distance/Lack of Services 13% Too far out/distance/the commute 7 Lack of shopping/too far away 2 Lack of restaurants 2 Lack of places for family entertainment/places to meet people 2 Too many police/police harassment 4% Traffic tickets/speed traps 3 The roads/need more roads/use more than Oracle Road 2 Recall elections/recall movement 2 Don't like the way elected officials run the city 2 Heat/hot summers 2 No public transportation 2 "Squabbling"/city council fighting 2 Taxes 1 Water/running out of water 1 Not enough lighting/no street lights 1 Politics 1 No fire department 1 Too close to Tucson/the city 1 Noise/street noise 1 Not enough parks 1 Other 9 Nothing/none/no opinion 14 Don't know/no answer 10 Table 3:The things I like least about living in Oro Valley are.... et:N 7 Oro Valley General Plan Community Survey Results Report 2.2 ORO VALLEY GROWTH Residents are split in their perception of Oro Valley's growth; half feel it is growing "too much" (47%) and the other half feel its growth is "about right" (46%) or "too little" (2%). Those who have resided in Oro Valley for more than five years and those ages 45 to 64 are significantly more likely than their comparative groups to feel the town is growing too fast(53%vs. 39%for both). Perception of Oro Valley Growth About right 46% _Too little 2% Don't know 5% i Too much 47% a fix: 8 Oro Valley General Plan Community Survey Results Report 3.0 PRESERVATION OF OPEN SPACE AND SCENIC VIEWS Approximatelytwo-thirds of residents feel scenic views in Oro Valley have been preserved well (65% excellent + g ood), however fewer than one-half feel natural, undeveloped open space in Oro Valley has preserved reserved well (45% excellent + good). However, in both cases residents are more likely to indicate a "good" job has been done than feel an "excellent" job has been done preserving open space and scenic views (38% good and 7%excellent for open space and 48%good and 17%excellent for views). As demonstrated in Table 4 and Table 5, residents most likely to be pleased with the preservation of open space and scenic views are those relatively new to the area (lived in Oro Valley for less than five years) and those who perceive the Town as growing"too little"or"about right". Preservation s r aj ti0:0**46INI ,�,ay ?.ti. g 65/ Scenic Views .M, Natural Undeveloped 45%, Open Space i 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% •Excellent E3Good Table 4: Preservation of Open Space - Years in Oro Valley Growth Perception Too little/ Total 5 or less 5 or more about right Too much Responses (n=403) (n=163) (n=231) (n=192) (n=191) Excellent + Good 45% 52% 40% 61% 29% Excellent 7% 11% 4% 10% 3% Good 38 41 36 51 26 Fair 34 29 38 24 45 Poor 15 10 19 6 24 Don't know/NA 6 9 4 8 3 Table 5: Please rate how well natural, undeveloped, open space in Oro Valley has been preserved. Bold denotes a percentage significantly higher than its comparative group. 9 Oro Valley General Plan Community Survey Results Report Table 5: Preservation of Scenic Views Years in Oro Valley Growth Perception Too little/ Too much Total 5 or less 5 or more about right (n=191) Responses (n=403) (n=163) (n=231) (n=192) Excellent + Good 65% 73% 57% 78% 52% Excellent 17% 24% 10% 22% 12% Good 48 49 47 56 40 Fair 24 18 29 16 34 Poor 8 5 11 3 14 Don't know/NA 3 4 2 3 2 - Table 6:Please rate how well scenic views in Oro Valley have been preserved. Bold denotes a percentage significantly higher than its comparative_group. r 10 Oro Valley General Plan Community Survey Results Report 4.0 TRAFFIC CONGESTION Five in seven residents (71%) believe traffic congestion is a problem in Oro Valley. Residents ages 46 to 64 are significantly more likely than those younger and older to feel traffic congestion is a problem (79%vs. g ° too much are more likely and 69/°, respectively). Residents who feel Oro Valley has grown to feel this is a problem than those who feel growth is either too little or about right(79%vs. 64%). A vast majority (92%) of those who feel traffic congestion is a problem in Oro Valley support efforts to improve traffic flow by synchronizing lights and widening roads ("4" + "5" rating). Support for this solution is strongest among men (96% vs. 89% of women), newer residents and those who feel growth is about right or too little(details on following page). Residents are also largely supportive of providing more opportunities for biking and walking (84%) with newcomers and younger residents rating their support the highest(90%vs. 80% of those in the Town more than 5 years and 92%vs. 82%of residents 45 and older). Residents were also supportive of promoting access to existing freeways and corridors in and outside Oro Valley (79%) and for providing more mass transit services (71%). The promotion of access to existing freeways and corridors is more highly supported by those who have lived there for less than five years and those who feel growth is on track or behind (details on following page). Women are significantly more likely than men to oppose this solution (19% vs. 9%). Men, in contrast, are significantly more likely than women to oppose providing more transit services(25%vs. 12%for women who are more likely to say "don't know"). Support for Transportation Solutions Among those who feel Traffic Congestion in Oro Valley is a Problem Sum of"4" and"5" ratings with "5" meaning "Strongly Support" �. 92% Traffic flow improvements Opportunities for bicycling and walking 79% Access to existing freeways&corridors 71% More transit services 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% n=287 - "5" „4„ 11 Oro Valley General Plan Community Survey Results Report • Table 6: Traffic Congestion and Relief Measures in Oro Valley Years in Oro Valley Perception of Growth Too little/ Total 5 or less 5 or more about right Too much Responses (n=287) (n 109) (n=172) (n=122) (n=151) Traffic flow improvements(synchronized 92% 96% 91% 96% 89% lights,widening roads) _ Opportunities for bicycling and walking 84 90 80 82 86 Access to existing freeways and corridors in 79 85 74 86 72 and outside of Oro Valley More transit services 71 74 69 66 74 Table 8-11: If yes,please rank your level of support for the following potential congestion relief measures. The first is... Would you say you Strongly support, Support, Oppose,or Strongly Oppose Bold denotes a significantly higher percentage. 12 Oro Valley General Plan Community Survey Results Report 5.0 WATER RESOURCES Nearly all residents are supportive of using water conservation efforts and recycling household water to ensure an adequate supply of water for the future (94% and 93% "strongly support + support," respectively). Although support is slightly weaker, a majority of residents also support the development and use of alternative water resources and limiting growth (82% and 76%). Residents ages 18 to 44 are more likely than those ages 45 to 64 to support alternative water resources (88% vs. 78% compared to 82% of those 65 and older). Limiting growth gains significantly greater support among those who feel Oro Valley is growing too much (92%vs. 62% of those who feel growth is on track) and among women (82% vs. 69%of men). Use and Management of Water Resources Sum of"Strongly Support"and "Support" 94% Water conservation efforts 93% Use of recycled household water Development/use of alternative 82% water resources Limited growth 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% MIStrongly support IDSupport n=403 Table 7: Use and Management of Water Resources (n=443) NET Strongly Strongly Don't Responses Support Support Support Oppose Oppose know Water conservation efforts 94% _ 42% 52% 2% 1% 3% Use of recycled household water 93 47 46 5 1 2 for landscaping and other purposes Development and use of 82 28 54 5 1 12 alternative water resources Limited growth 76 _ 27 49 19 3 3 Table 13-16: There are several ways that Oro Valley could help ensure an adequate supply of water for the future. Please rank your level of support for each of the following options. 13 Oro Valley General Plan Community Survey Results Report 6.0 GROWTH AREAS AND LAND USE 6.1 USE OF UNDEVELOPED OR VACANT LAND A majority of residents support using undeveloped or vacant land in Oro Valley for parks, undisturbed open space, and/or for schools or educational facilities (91%, 87%, and 84%, respectively either "strongly support" or "support" these options). More than two in five residents "strongly" support using the land for parks (42%) and/or maintaining open space (43%). Although support is considerably weaker, more than half support retail, business, and residential development of vacant land (58%, 53% and 53%). Men are significantly more likely than women to support putting business offices or research parks on the land (59%vs. 46%). Residents with children in the household (18 and younger) and residents ages 18 to 44 are significantly more likely to support putting parks on the land (98% vs. 89% with older members and 95% vs. 87% of those 45 to 64). Similarly residents ages 18 to 44 and those with household members ages birth to 44 are significantly more likely to support building schools or educational facilities on the land (94% and 92% vs. 82%of those older and with older household members). As expected, those who feel Oro Valley has grown "too much" are significantly more likely to support keeping the land as undisturbed open space and in contrast, those who feel growth is "about right" or"too little" are significantly more likely to support using the land for all other options presented. (Detailed percentages in Table 8). Support for Use of Undeveloped and Vacant Land Sum of"Strongly Support" and "Support" 91% Parks 87% Undisturbed open space .111111111111111 44'4 'Evs "'�T F`4 `v `-x 84% Schools/educational facilities 58% Retail shops&services 53% Business/office/research park 53%' ' Residential developments Amummoiumm....illIlIllIlIll11.111r 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% n=403 Strongly support DSupport 14 Oro Valley General Plan Community Survey Results Report Table 8: Uses for Undeveloped Land Summary of Strongly Support + Support Ages in Household Growth Perception Too little/ Too Total <19 1944 45-64 65+ right much Responses (n=403) (n=103) (n=98) (n=140) (n=143) (n=192) (n=191) Parks 91% 98% 92% 86% 90% 91% 90% Undisturbed open space 8786 88 86 87 82 93 _ Schools/educational facilities 84 91 92 79 85 91 78 Retail shops&services 58 61 54 58 62 76 41 Residential developments 53 54 54 51 51 78 27 Business/office/research park 53 57 52 48 48 _ 68 39 Table 18-23: There are several ways to use undeveloped or vacant land within Oro Valley. Please indicate the level of your support for the following uses of the undeveloped land in the town. Bold denotes a percentage significantly higher than the underlined comparative group. 4 15 Oro Valley General Plan Community Survey Results Report 6.2 HOUSING DEVELOPMENT OPTIONS A majority of residents are supportive of developing single-family homes with at least one-acre lots (85% strongly + support). Residents ages 18 to 64 are significantly more likely than those 65 and older to support this option (89%vs. 79%). Nearly two-thirds (64%) indicate they are supportive of single-family subdivisions with smaller lots. Support for the development of apartments, condominiums, and townhouses is significantly lower (31%). As might be expected, residents who feel Oro Valley has grown "too much" are significantly less likely than those who feel growth is behind or on track to support the development of subdivisions (54% vs. 76%) or apartment type homes (19% vs. 41%). In addition, those who are newer to the area are more likely than those who have lived in the area for more than five years to support the construction of apartments, condominiums or townhouses (40%vs. 23%). Support for Residential Development Options Sum of"Strongly Support" and "Support" When developing residential areas,there are various housing options available. Please indicate the level of your support for each of the following types of housing options within Oro Valley. 85% Single-family 1 acre plus lots 64% Single-family subdivisions less than one acre 31% Apartments/Condominiums/Townhouses 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% n=403 II1Strongly support OSupport 16 Oro Valley General Plan Community Survey Results Report 6.3 COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT When asked to prioritize the development of additional commercial and retail services,very few residents felt anyof the proposed business developments are a"high priority" (11%to 13%). In fact, fewer than half of residents ranked any of the options as a "medium" or "high" priority. Residents were most likely to feel developing small community shopping centers and neighborhood shopping centers should be aP riority (49% and 48%, medium + high priority). Considerably fewer indicated major shopping centers are important (37%) and in fact 23% felt they should have no priority at all (vs. 12% to 13% for the other shopping centers). Interestingly, men are significantly more likely than women to feel small community shopping centers should be a medium or high priority (57%vs. 41%). And as expected, those who feel the town has grown "too much"were significantly less likely to feel any of the options are a priority. Emphasis on Additional Commerical and Retail Services 37% 36% 13% Small community shopping centers �r t� 12% 36% 'W O 37% 11 Neighborhood shopping centers „.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,v;,..4014.14,7:: � i ya% a 23% 37%,,,,,, #f 25% 12% Major shopping center ' �: 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% n=403 MN No priority G Low Priority •Medium Priority ElHigh Priority Table 9: Commercial and Retail Development Summary of High and Medium Priority Growth Perception Too little/ Total about right Too much Responses (n=403) (n=192) (n=191) Major shopping center(such as Foothills Mall or the 49% 64% 35% Target Center at Rooney Ranch) Small community shopping centers(with grocery stores like 48 62 35 Safeway Vistoso) Neighborhood shopping centers(like Lambert/La Canada& 37 50 27 Mountain View centers) Table 29-31: What level of priority do you feel Oro Valley should place on developing additional commercial and retail services within the community such as... 17 Oro Valley General Plan Community Survey Results Report 6.4 PARKS AND RECREATION SERVICES A vast majority (90%) of residents feel open space and nature preserves should be a priority for Oro Valley and more than two-thirds (67%) feel it should be a "high priority." Most residents also consider the development of trails and multi-use paths and small neighborhood parks and playgrounds to be a priority (88% and 83%), however the percentage who views these developments as a higher priority is much lower(51%and 49%). Although even less of a "high" priority, a majority of residents think parks with recreation opportunities such as pools, picnic areas, ball fields and tennis courts (80%) and a multi-use center with meeting rooms and a community center, and cultural and performing arts area (74%) are important recreation services. Very few residents feel a municipal golf course is needed (34% name a medium or high priority). Emphasis on Parks and Recreation Services 23% 67/o ° ° Open space/nature preserves 4% 37% 51% Trails&multi-use paths Small neighborhood 4°/0 34% 49% parks/playgrounds 6% 14% 37% 43% Parks with recreation ......................................:.... 6% 18% 40% 34% Multi-use Center AY9lfdlDDDt64somx ' otummosmesataxmar 24% 42% 21% 13% Municipal golf course 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% n=403 III No priority =Low Priority 11111Medium Priority =High Priority As demonstrated below, the perception of priority often depends on the age of the resident interviewed. Whereas trails and multi-use paths are most important to residents ages 18 to 44, both this younger age group and those 65 and older are significantly more likely than those ages 45 to 64 to place value on small neighborhood parks and playgrounds. In contrast, a municipal golf course is more appealing to the 45 to 64 year olds. Trails and multi-use paths are more of a priority to those with household members between the ages of birth and 44 (98%vs. 84%of those with older household members). Women and those who feel Oro Valley has grown "too much" are significantly more likely to place a priority on open space and nature preserves (94% vs. 86% of men rate as high or medium priority and 96%vs. 83% of those who feel growth is about right or too little). 18 Oro Valley General Plan Community Survey Results Report Table 10: Development of Parks and Recreation Services Summary of High and Medium Priority Age of Resident Total 18-44 45-64 65+ Responses (n=403) (n=95) (n=135) (n=157) Open space/nature preserves 90% 94% 87% 90% Trails& multi-use paths 88 99 _ 86 83 Small neighborhood parks/playgrounds 83 88 76 87 Parks(with recreation such as pool, picnic areas, ball 80 83 76 80 fields and tennis courts) Multi-use Center (meeting rooms, community 74 74 73 75 center,cultural/performing arts,etc.) Municipal golf course _ 34 28 _ 42 29 Table 39-44 What emphasis should Oro Valley place on the development of the following parks & recreation services? Bold denotes a percentage significantly higher than the underlined comparative group. teN 19 Oro Valley General Plan Community Survey Results Report 7.0 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 7.1 EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES Residents are most likely to feel Oro Valley should place a priority on developing employment opportunities in the medical and health care fields (85%) with nearly half feeling it should be a "high" priority (47%). Two-thirds (66%) feel small job opportunities centered in professional office complexes should be a medium (48%) or high (18%) priority. Younger and older residents are significantly more likely than those ages 45 to 64 indicate employment opportunities in professional office complexes should be a priority(72%vs. 58%). Although fewer feel jobs in research and technical parks should be a priority (59%), residents are more likely to indicate this should be a "high" priority (29%) than the development of opportunities in most of the other areas; this is particularly true for men (42%vs. 16%of women). Approximately half(51%)of residents rate the development of hotel and resort jobs as a priority. Residents ages 45 to 64 and those with household members under 65 are significantly more likely to feel hotel and resort jobs are important (58% vs. 46% of residents older and younger and 57% vs. 46% with household members 65 an d older). Residents are least likely to think light industry and manufacturing employment opportunities should be developed (32%). Men are more likely than women to find this development important (38% vs. 25%). A belief that light industry and manufacturing jobs are a priority as age decreases (36%of those 65+ vs. 23%of those 18 to 44). In all cases, those who feel Oro Valley has grown "too" much are significantly less likely to feel any development of additional employment opportunities are a priority. Priority for Development of Additional Employment Opportunities 5% 11% 36% 47% Medical/health care 8% 24% 48% 18% Small professional office complexes Research/technical parks 12% 26% 30% 29% 12% 36% 31% 20% Hotels/resorts Light industry/manufacturing 21% 46% 21% 11% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% n=403 IIN No Priority C3Low Priority IMMedium Priority OHigh Priority 20 Oro Valley General Plan Community Survey Results Report 7.2 REVENUE OPTIONS Residents are most supportive of increasing development fees as a way to generate additional revenue for the city(74%; 25% strongly + 49% support). Nearly three in five (57%) support additional annexation as a revenue source, but only 9% "strongly" support this option. Annexation is particularly appealing to men (64%vs. 51%of women) and those who feel growth is about right or too little (71%vs. 47%"too much"). Increased commercial development finds support from slightly less than half of residents (47%) and again support is strongest among men (54% vs. 39% of women) and those who feel growth is on track or behind (65%vs. 31%). Very few residents support an increased sales tax, a personal property tax, or the reduction of town services (30%, 22% and 18%, respectively). Oro Valley's oldest residents (65+) are less likely to support a sales tax (25% vs. 36% ages 45 to 64). Support for a property tax is stronger among younger and older residents (28%of those 18 to 44 and 25%of those 65 and older vs. 16% in between). Support for Alternative Sources of Revenue Sum of"Strongly Support" and "Support" -tOR Increased development fees 'y 04 � ; , 74% 57% Additional annexation T a 47% I I Increased commercial development 11111111 30% Increased sales tax I I I ,22! I Town of Oro Valley personal property tax , IIIII 18% I Reducing Town services 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% n=403 •Strongly support EISupport Table 12: Support for Alternative Sources of Revenue NET Strongly Strongly Responses Support Support Support Oppose Oppose Increased development fees 74% 25% 49% 17% 5% Additional annexation 57 9 48 27 6 Increased commercial development 47 7 40 36 12 Increased sales tax 30 2 28 51 16 Town of Oro Valley personal property tax 22 2 20 50 22 Reducing Town services _ 18 3 15 60 12 Table 46-51: Currently, 30%of the Oro Valley's General Fund revenue comes from taxes and fees on construction, which is a one-time revenue source. What alternative sources of revenue would you support? 22 i ems-• TOWN OF ORO VALLEY ITEM #7 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION-SUPPLEMENTAL MEETING DATE: April 17, 2002 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk Brent Sinclair, Community Development Director SUBJECT: SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION - MODIFICATION TO THE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE 2020 SCHEDULE AND STATUS REPORT #5 SUMMARY: If the Council decides to extend the General Plan Update 2020 project schedule from voter ratification in November 2002 to March 2003, there will be additional fiscal impact to the Town. ELECTION COSTS According to Pima County Division of Elections and the Recorder's Office the estimated costs would be as follows: Combined Election (November 2002) Stand Alone Election (March 2003) lling Place Election Ballot By Mail Election (Ballots could be sent by mail since there is no other election affecting Oro Valley in March). $15,000+- $45,000+ These costs are estimates only, and could change depending upon what we want to include in the General Plan Publicity Pamphlet. One informational newsletter is included in the current General Plan budget. Since the Election in November is expected to contain many issues and candidates, we will either be the last item on the second side of the ballot, or we could ask that a separate ballot containing only our issue be handed out at the same time the County ballot is handed out in the polling place. If the special election is combined with the State/County election in November, it is the recommendation of the Town Clerk and Pima County to conduct a polling place election to avoid voter confusion. STAFF AND CONSULTANT COSTS Extending the ratification election to March 2003 would result in added costs for the extra meetings. These costs would not exceed $10,000 for the consultant. There would also be added costs to retain the project manager and other ancillary staff who devote time to the General Plan. Our original project budget included 'eneral Plan staff through December 31, 2002 and a portion of these costs are already accounted for. However, L_ additional $5,000 would need to be factored in to cover the extension. TMMARY OF NET FISCAL IMPACT NOVEMBER 2002 ELECTION MARCH 2003 ELECTION Election $15,000 $45,000 Consultant $10,000 Staff $ 5,000 Total $15,000 $60,000 c'• Catwtt-t-t: Town lerk Community Development Director Al,.,.,. dX I. _Al own Mana:er \$i LEY 111W -7 I TEM #7 r _ 4-Jr.)," /17/02 TC Meeting : _eftr't g� 1t(?,''(lN DED Office of the Town Attorney Memo To: Mayor and Council From: Dan L.Dudley ..,,,; Date: 4/16/02 Re: Timing of Submission of General Plan Amendment to Voters Cc: Town Manager and Department Heads The Mayor asked whether the Town was required to submit the General Plan update to the voters of the Town of Oro Valley prior to December 31,2002. • The short answer is no. ARS§9-461.06(12)provides as follows: Each city and town that is subject to the provisions of title 9, chapter 4, article 6, Arizona Revised Statutes, and each county that is subject to title 11, chapter 6, article 2, Arizona Revised Statutes, and whose general or comprehensive plan or most recent readoption or rewrite or amendment to the general or comprehensive plan was adopted: 1. Before January 1, 1989 shall adopt or readopt its general or comprehensive plan in a manner consistent with this act on or before December 31, 2001. "2. On or after January 1, 1989 shall amend the plan to include all the elements required by this act on or before December 31, 2001. "B. Notwithstanding subsection A of this section, each city and town with a population of more than two thousand five hundred and less than seventy-five thousand persons according to the most recent United States decennial census whose general plan or most recent adoption or rewrite or amendment to the general plan was adopted: "1. Before January 1, 1989 shall adopt or readopt its general plan in a manner consistent with this act on or before December 31, 2002. "2. On or after January 1, 1989 shall amend the plan to include all the elements required by this act on or before December 31, 2002. Clearly, Oro Valley is a town with a population of more than two thousand five hundred and less than seventy-five thousand persons according to the most recent United States decennial census. Therefore, whether or not the Town's General Plan was adopted before or after January 1, 1989,the Town Council has until December 31, 2002 to amend the plan to include all the elements required by Growing Smarter Plus. The requirement that the General Plan be ratified by the voters is not specific as to time and therefore due to the distinction in language between the action taken at the Town Council level in "adopting or readopting the General Plan" by December 31, 2002 and the language used in 9-461.06 (J) requiring the voters to "ratify " the action taken by the Town Council, a clear mandate as to date of ratification does not exist. Therefore as long as the voters act to ratify the General Plan adopted by the Town Council within a reasonable period after the end of the year, the Town will be in compliance with the law. The City and Town Attorneys of this state concur with this interpretation that the ratification of the voters is not required by December 31,2002. Additionally, it is expected that the Arizona Legislature will approve House Bill 2601 before adjournment this year. That bill extends the above deadlines by one year. • Page 2 General Plan Update Extension IT WAS A LITTLE LESS THAN A YEAR AGO THAT I TESTIFIED BEFORE THE FIRST P &Z HEARING ON THE UPDATE SCOPE OF WORK. AT THAT TIME, I STATED THAT I WAS SURE THE TASK WOULD BE COMPLETED ON TIME,BUT I WAS CONCERNED ABOUT THE QUALITY OF THE CITIZEN PARTICIPATION. I WAS RIGHT TO BE CONCERNED. OF COURSE, I REFER TO THE PARTICIPATION DEFINITION IN THE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ACTION PLAN, ADOPTED BY THE TOWN, NOT THE DEFINITION USED BY THE UPDATE STAFF. IF THERE IS TO BE AN EXTENSION, IT SHOULD BE LONG ENOUGH TO ALLOW FOR PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ... THAT IS ... `CITIZENS WORKING COLLABORATIVELY TOWARD AGREEMENT'. THE FOCUS GROUP MEETINGS WERE SO COMPRESSED,THAT CITIZENS WERE ACTUALLY EXCLUDED - ACTUALLY PREVENTED - FROM CONTRIBUTING TO SOME OF THE TOPICS IN THE GROUP. THIS EXCLUSION DOESN'T ALLOW COLLABORATION OR AGREEMENT,AND UNDERMINES THE RELIABILITY AND USEABILITY OF THE INFORMATION COLLECTED. THE MEETINGS WERE SO FRANTIC AND FRENZIED THAT I SAW PEOPLE LEAVE; I SAW PEOPLE STOP TRYING TO CONTRIBUTE. RARELY WERE ALL THE ISSUES ADDRESSED. THIS FORMAT ALSO DID NOT ALLOW COLLABORATION OR AGREEMENT ... MORE LIKE CAPITULATION. TOWN STAFF REFERS TO PARTICIPATION AS PUBLIC COMMENT. BUT EVEN PUBLIC COMMENT - WHETHER THROUGH THE WEBSITE,MAIL OR VOICEMAIL - IS NOT ACKNOWLEDGED;NOT RESPONDED TO;NO ACTION TAKEN. THE SCOPE OF WORK WAS TO INCLUDE CITIZEN RESOLUTION TO DISPUTES SURROUNDING INTERPRETATIONS APPLIED BY STAFF TO GENERAL PLAN POLICIES ... DIDN'T HAPPEN. NO RE CONVENING OF THE ESL COMMITTEE... NO SPECIFIC PLAN FOR THE STATE LAND. IF AN EXTENSION IS ALLOWED IT SHOULD BE FOR A YEAR TO RE CREATE LEGITAMATE OPPORTUNITIES FOR PUBLIC PARTICIPATION, AS DEFINED BY THE PPAP. Bill Adler 4-17-02