Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Packets - Council Packets (1390)
**Amended (07/31/01, 4:30 p.m.) AGENDA ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION AUGUST 1, 2001 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11,000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL EXECUTIVE SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM 1. Pursuant to ARS 38-431.03(A)(3) & (A)(4) discussion and/or consultation for Legal Advice & pending litigation regarding Anderson Roache III vs. Town of Oro Valley et al 2. Pursuant to ARS 38-431.03(A)(3) & (A)(4) discussion and/or consultation for Legal Advice & pending litigation regarding Oro Valley Municipal Property Corporation vs. Canada Hills Water Co. Ltd. Partnership 3. Pursuant to ARS 38-431.03 (A)(7) discussion and/or consultation with Town representatives regarding negotiations for purchase, sale or lease of real property within the Town RESUME REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS — TOWN MANAGER The Mayor and Council may consider and/or take action on the items listed below: ORDER OF BUSINESS: MAYOR WILL REVIEW THE ORDER OF THE MEETING CALL TO AUDIENCE -According to the Arizona Open Meeting Law, the Town Council may only discuss matters listed on the Town Council Agenda. Matters brought up by the public under "Call to Audience"cannot be discussed by the Town Council as they have not been placed on the agenda. Any items must be addressed to the whole Council, not a specific member. In order to speak during "Call to Audience'; please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. 1. CONSENT AGENDA (Consideration and/or possible action) A. Minutes — 6/28/01; 7/18/01 08/01/01 Agenda, Council Regular Session 2 B. OV12-99-19 Approval of Substitute Assurance Agreement between Monterey Homes Construction Inc., and First American Title Insurance as Trustee of Mira Vista, Lots 46 and 47 C. OV12-00-19 Approval of Rancho Vistoso Parcel G Final Plat, for 88 single-family lots located on the west side of Desert Fairways Drive within Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 10, Parcel 219-220-01G D. Approval of request by United Way of Greater Tucson for sponsorship of a forum to discuss transportation issues hosted by United Way scheduled for Wednesday, August 8, 2001 from 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. in the Town Council Chambers 2. PUBLIC HEARING — ORDINANCE NO. (0)O1-22AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING CHAPTER 3, SECTION 3-5-5 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, OF THE CODE OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA Explanation: By adopting this Ordinance, the Town will be consistent with its interview and appointment process for all Town Boards and Commissions per the adopted policy for Appointments to Boards, Commissions and Advisory Bodies of the Town. 3. OV6-01-01 —AT&T WIRELESS APPEAL OF JUNE 12, 2001 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD DECISION TO DENY THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST FOR A TIER 1 MINOR TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITY (PROPOSED SITE IS LOCATED IN THE COMMON AREA OF THE ESTATES OF HONEY BEE CANYON (PARCEL #219202840), AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD AND QUIET RAIN DRIVE) Explanation: At their June 12, 2001 meeting, the Development Review Board denied this request primarily based on concerns, raised by adjacent neighbors, regarding adverse visual and noise impacts. A decision of the DRB may be appealed to the Town Council per Section 3-304 of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised. 4. OV12-97-17C THE WLB GROUP REQUESTS A REPLAT OF LOT 30 IN COPPER RIDGE 1 (PARCEL #224082070) LOCATED 1/4 MILE EAST OF LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD AND SOUTH OF TANGERINE ROAD Explanation: The WLB Group, representing Fairfield Homes, has requested to replat Lot 30 of Copper Ridge I into two separate lots. Currently, Lot 30 consists of 54,758 square feet. The split would create 32,247 square feet for Lot 50 and 22,510 square feet in size for Lot 51. The Lot split complies with the development standards for the R1-10 zoning district and all notes and conditions associated with the previous final plat (approved 4-1-98) have been included in this plat. 08/01/01 Agenda, Council Regular Session 3 5. RESOLUTION NO. (R)01-71 A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, DECLARING THAT THE "SCOPE OF WORK AND CONSULTANT COST FOR THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY FOCUS 2020 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE 2001" IS A PUBLIC RECORD; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY; AND AUTHORIZING THE AWARD OF CONTRACT AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTING SERVICES BETWEEN THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY AND BRW, INC. FOR GENERAL PLAN CONSULTING SERVICES Explanation: Planning staff recommends approval of the final Scope of Work and Consultant cost for BRW, Inc. of$236,000 for the General Plan Update 2001 and authorize Town legal staff to prepare a contract consistent with the approved cost and Scope of Work. Adopting the resolution with an emergency clause would allow for the Scope of Work or expenditure of funds to become effective immediately. 6. **RECONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE NO. (0)01-20 OV11-01-01 RECONSIDER ORDINANCE NO. (0)01-20 AMENDING THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY GENERAL PLAN FOR A PORTION OF RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 11 BORDERED ON THE EAST, NORTH AND WEST SIDES BY THE TOWN BOUNDARY AND BY STONE CANYON II, III AND IV ON THE SOUTH Explanation: If the Mayor and Council vote to reconsider Ordinance No. (0)01-20 this will allow them to reconsider the ordinance that was approved by the Mayor and Council during their July 18, 2001 meeting. 7. **ORDINANCE NO. (0)01-20 OV11-01-01 REQUEST TO AMEND THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY GENERAL PLAN FOR A PORTION OF RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 11 BORDERED ON THE EAST, NORTH AND WEST SIDES BY THE TOWN BOUNDARY AND BY STONE CANYON II, III AND IV ON THE SOUTH Explanation: If the Mayor and Council vote to reconsider Ordinance No. (0)01-20 this will allow them to reconsider the ordinance that was approved by the Mayor and Council during their July 18, 2001 meeting. 08/01/01 Agenda, Council Regular Session 4 8. **RECONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE NO. (0)01-21 OV11-01-02 RECONSIDER ORDINANCE NO. (0)01-21 AMENDING THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY GENERAL PLAN FOR THE AREA KNOWN AS RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 12, LOCATED NORTH OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD IN THE NOTCH FORMED BY THE TOWN BOUNDARIES BETWEEN RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOODS 11 & 13 Explanation: If the Mayor and Council vote to reconsider Ordinance No. (0)01-21 this will allow them to reconsider the ordinance that was approved by the Mayor and Council during their July 18, 2001 meeting. 9. **ORDINANCE NO. (0)01-21 OV11-01-02 REQUEST TO AMEND THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY GENERAL PLAN FOR THE AREA KNOWN AS RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 12, LOCATED NORTH OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD IN THE NOTCH FORMED BY THE TOWN BOUNDARIES BETWEEN RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOODS 11 & 13 Explanation: If the Mayor and Council vote to reconsider Ordinance No. (0)01-21 this will allow them to reconsider the ordinance that was approved by the Mayor and Council during their July 18, 2001 meeting. TOWN MANAGER'S REPORT CALL TO AUDIENCE—According to the Arizona Open Meeting Law, the Town Council may only discuss matters listed on the Town Council Agenda. Matters brought up by the public under "Call to Audience"cannot be discussed by the Town Council, as they have not been placed on the agenda. Any items must be addressed to the whole Council, not a specific g member. In order to speak during "Call to Audience'; please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. ADJOURNMENT POSTED: 07/25/01 AMENDED AGENDA POSTED: 07/31/01 4:30 p.m. 4:30 p.m. lh lh A packet of agenda materials as listed above is available for public inspection at least 24 hours prior to the Council meeting in the office of the Town Clerk between the hours of 8:00 a.m. — 5:00p.m. 08/01/01 Agenda, Council Regular Session 5 The Town of Oro Valley complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If any person with a disability needs any type of accommodation, please notify Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk, at 229-4700. INSTRUCTIONS TO SPEAKERS Members of the public have the right to speak during any posted public hearing. However, those items not listed as a public hearing are for consideration and action by the Town Council during the course of their business meeting. Members of the public may be allowed to speak on these topics at the discretion of the Chair. If you wish to address the Town Council on any item(s) on this agenda, please complete a speaker card located on the Agenda table at the back of the room and give it to the Town Clerk. Please indicate on the speaker card which item number and topic you wish to speak on, or if you wish to speak during "Call to Audience", please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. Please step forward to the podium when the Mayor announces the item(s) on the agenda which you are interested in addressing. 1. Please state your name and address for the record. 2. Speak only on the issue currently being discussed by Council. Please organize your speech, you will only be allowed to address the Council once regarding the topic being discussed. 3. Please limit your comments to 3 minutes. 4. During "Call to Audience" you may address the Council on any issue you wish. 5. Any member of the public speaking must speak in a courteous and respectful manner to those present. Thank you for your cooperation. AGENDA ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION AUGUST 1, 2001 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11,000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL EXECUTIVE SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM 1. Pursuant to ARS 38-431.03(A)(3) & (A)(4) discussion and/or consultation for Legal Advice & pending litigation regarding Anderson Roache III vs. Town of Oro Valley et al 2. Pursuant to ARS 38-431.03(A)(3) & (A)(4) discussion and/or consultation for Legal Advice & pending litigation regarding Oro Valley Municipal Property Corporation vs. Canada Hills Water Co. Ltd. Partnership 3. Pursuant to ARS 38-431.03 (A)(7) discussion and/or consultation with Town representatives regarding negotiations for purchase, sale or lease of real property within the Town RESUME REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS —TOWN MANAGER The Mayor and Council may consider and/or take action on the items listed below: ORDER OF BUSINESS: MAYOR WILL REVIEW THE ORDER OF THE MEETING CALL TO AUDIENCE — According to the Arizona Open Meeting Law, the Town Council may only discuss matters listed on the Town Council Agenda. Matters brought up by the public under "Call to Audience" cannot be discussed by the Town Council as they have not been placed on the agenda. Any items must be addressed to the whole Council, not a specific member. In order to speak during "Call to Audience'; please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. 1. CONSENT AGENDA (Consideration and/or possible action) A. Minutes — 6/28/01; 7/18/01 08/01/01 Agenda, Council Regular Session 2 B. OV12-99-19 Approval of Substitute Assurance Agreement between Monterey Homes Construction Inc., and First American Title Insurance as Trustee of Mira Vista, Lots 46 and 47 C. OV12-00-19 Approval of Rancho Vistoso Parcel G Final Plat, for 88 single-family lots located on the west side of Desert Fairways Drive within Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 10, Parcel 219-220-01 G D. Approval of request by United Way of Greater Tucson for sponsorship of a forum to discuss transportation issues hosted by United Way scheduled for Wednesday, August 8, 2001 from 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. in the Town Council Chambers 2. PUBLIC HEARING — ORDINANCE NO. (0)O1-22AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING CHAPTER 3, SECTION 3-5-5 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, OF THE CODE OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA Explanation: By adopting this Ordinance, the Town will be consistent with its interview and appointment process for all Town Boards and Commissions per the adopted policy for Appointments to Boards, Commissions and Advisory Bodies of the Town. 3. OV6-01-01 —AT&T WIRELESS APPEAL OF JUNE 12, 2001 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD DECISION TO DENY THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST FOR A TIER 1 MINOR TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITY (PROPOSED SITE IS LOCATED IN THE COMMON AREA OF THE ESTATES OF HONEY BEE CANYON (PARCEL #219202840), AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD AND QUIET RAIN DRIVE) Explanation: At their June 12, 2001 meeting, the Development Review Board denied this request primarily based on concerns, raised by adjacent neighbors, regarding adverse visual and noise impacts. A decision of the DRB may be appealed to the Town Council per Section 3-304 of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised. 4. OV12-97-17C THE WLB GROUP REQUESTS A REPLAT OF LOT 30 IN COPPER RIDGE 1 (PARCEL #224082070) LOCATED 1/4 MILE EAST OF LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD AND SOUTH OF TANGERINE ROAD Explanation: The WLB Group, representing Fairfield Homes, has requested to replat Lot 30 of Copper Ridge I into two separate lots. Currently, Lot 30 consists of 54,758 square feet. The split would create 32,247 square feet for Lot 50 and 22,510 square feet in size for Lot 51 . The Lot split complies with the development standards for the R1-10 zoning district and all notes and conditions associated with the previous final plat (approved 4-1-98) have been included in this plat. 08/01/01 Agenda, Council Regular Session 3 5. RESOLUTION NO. (R)01-71 A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, DECLARING THAT THE "SCOPE OF WORK AND CONSULTANT COST FOR THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY FOCUS 2020 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE 2001" IS A PUBLIC RECORD; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY; AND AUTHORIZING THE AWARD OF CONTRACT AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTING SERVICES BETWEEN THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY AND BRW, INC. FOR GENERAL PLAN CONSULTING SERVICES Explanation: Planning staff recommends approval of the final Scope of Work and Consultant cost for BRW, Inc. of $236,000 for the General Plan Update 2001 and authorize Town legal staff to prepare a contract consistent with the approved cost and Scope of Work. Adopting the resolution with an emergency clause would allow for the Scope of Work or expenditure of funds to become effective immediately. TOWN MANAGER'S REPORT CALL TO AUDIENCE—According to the Arizona Open Meeting Law, the Town Council may only discuss matters listed on the Town Council Agenda. Matters brought up by the public under "Call to Audience"cannot be discussed by the Town Council, as they have not been placed on the agenda. Any items must be addressed to the whole Council, not a specific member. In order to speak during "Call to Audience'; please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. ADJOURNMENT POSTED: 07/25/01 4:30 p.m. Ih A packet of agenda materials as listed above is available for public inspection at least 24 hours prior to the Council meeting in the office of the Town Clerk between the hours of 8:00 a.m. — 5:00p.m. The Town of Oro Valley complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If any person with a disability needs any type of accommodation, please notify Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk, at 229-4700. 08/01/01 Agenda, Council Regular Session 4 INSTRUCTIONS TO SPEAKERS Members of the public have the right to speak during any posted public hearing. However, those items not listed as a public hearing are for consideration and action by the Town Council during the course of their business meeting. Members of the public may be allowed to speak on these topics at the discretion of the Chair. Ify ou wish to address the Town Council on any item(s) on this agenda, please complete a speaker card located on the Agenda table at the back of the room andg ive it to the Town Clerk. Please indicate on the speaker card which item number and topic you wish to speak on, or if you wish to speak during "Call to Audience", please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. Please step forward to the podium when the Mayor announces the item(s) on the agenda which you are interested in addressing. 1. Please state your name and address for the record. 2. Speak only on the issue currently being discussed by Council. Please organize your speech, you will only be allowed to address the Council once regarding the topic being discussed. 3. Please limit your comments to 3 minutes. 4. During "Call to Audience" you may address the Council on any issue you wish. 5. Any member of the public speaking must speak in a courteous and respectful manner to those present. Thank you for your cooperation. AFT MINUTES ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL STUDY SESSION & SPECIAL SESSION JUNE 28, 2001 ORO VALLEY TOWN HALL (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUILDING—HOPI ROOM) 11,000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE SPECIAL SESSION -AT OR AFTER 6:30 PM CALL TO ORDER: 6:34 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Paul Loomis,Mayor Fran LaSala,-Vice Mayor(arrived at 6:38 p.m.) Bart Rochman, Council Member Werner Wolff, Council Member EXCUSED: Dick Johnson, Council Member EXECUTIVE SESSION -AT OR AFTER 6:30 PM CALL TO ORDER: 6:35 p.m. A MOTION was made at 6:35 p.m. by Council Member Rochman and SECONDED by Council Member Wolff to go into an Executive Session pursuant to ARS 38- 431.03(A)(3) 8- 431.03 A (3) & (A)(4) Legal Advice regarding Wong v. Town of Oro Valley,Pima County Cause No. 20005064. MOTION carried 3 —0. In addition to the Town Manager, Town Attorney and Town Clerk, Community Development Director Brent Sinclair and Special Counsel Tom Irvin were also present for the Executive Session. A MOTION was made to go out of Executive Session by Vice Mayor LaSala at 7:05 p.m. MOTION SECONDED by Council Member Rochman. MOTION carried 4—0. RESUME SPECIAL SESSION AT OR AFTER 7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER: 7:10 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Paul Loomis,Mayor Fran LaSala, Vice Mayor (arrived at 6:38 p.m. Bart Rochman, Council Member Werner Wolff, Council Member EXCUSED: Dick Johnson, Council Member CONSIDERATION AND/OR POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING THE COURT ORDER OF JUNE 15, 2001,IN WONG V. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY,ARIZONA, PIMA COUNTY CAUSE #20005064 REQUIRING THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY TO APPROVE OV12-99-18 NARANJA RIDGE ESTATES PRELIMINARY PLAT,AS SUBMITTED ON AUGUST 16, 2000,WITH THE REVISED CONDITIONS (THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE 6/28/01 Minutes,Council Special/Study Session 2 EAST SIDE OF THE MONTE DEL ORO SUBDIVISION AND ABUTTING THE SOUTH SIDE OF NARANJA ROAD, BETWEEN LA CANADA DRIVE AND FIRST AVENUE.) Special Counsel Tom Irvin referred to the Order of Judge Brown dated June 15, 2001 and stated that Judge Brown ordered that the preliminary plat be approved with the omission of Condition # 1 that required sewer. Mr. Irvin stated that Judge Brown indicated that since Oro Valley does not have a sewer department, and since Oro Valley has delegated that authority to Pima County; and, Pima County had previously granted a conditional permit for the sewer. Therefore, as the Town Council, they could not legally take into account the sewer issue. Larry Shubart, Legal Counsel representing the Wong family stated that he had no comments regarding this matter. Carl Hart, 502 Matterhorn, Oro Valley, Arizona. Mr. Hart expressed the Highlands Mobile Home Park Homeowners Association's opposition to the Wong property staying on septic, and stated that the Highlands Mobile Home Park authorized the hook-up to the sewer line that is capable of handling sewer for the homes in that area, including the Wong property. A MOTION was made by Mayor Loomis to approve the Naranj a Ridge Estates Preliminary Plat (OV12-99-18) submitted on August 16, 2000 as modified, as required by the Order of Judge Brown of June 15, 2001 in Pima County Superior Cause Number 20005064. MOTION SECONDED by Council Member Rochman. MOTION carried 3 — 1 with Vice Mayor LaSala opposed. GENERAL PLAN UPDATE a. Amendment to Scope of Work (General Plan Update) b. Amendment to the Public Participation Plan (General Plan Update) Melissa Shaw reviewed the General Plan Update 2001 Scope of Work, Public Participation&Work Plan: Project Goals: • Top rovide Town with an updated Plan to reflect Town's policies regarding growth and development and explore interest in utilizing sustainable development as a framework. • Incorporate recent changes in state planning law (Growing Smarter Legislation). • Prepare required elements not currently adopted in Focus 2020. • Implement the Town of Oro Valley Public Participation Action Plan. Public Participation Action Plan (PPAC) Adopted Plan designed to reach more people by incorporating wide variety of techniques. p � • Steering Committee • Technical Advisory Committee • Sector Boards 6/28/01 Minutes, Council Special/Study Session 3 • Boards and Commissions • Leadership Interviews • Topic Focus Groups • Future Search Kick-Off Meeting • Open Houses • Landowner/Developer Forum • Public Hearings • Surveys • Web Page (interactive) &Newsletters • Technical Reports • Youth Forum & CPI • Walk-Abouts &Planning Lecture Series (Recommend not do this year due to time constraints). • Community Events & Traveling Display • Speakers Bureau Mr. Sinclair stated the old Sector Board concept included geographical areas. The new concept includes no geographical areas, but focus areas of interest to bring everyone into thep rocess. This will begin the kick-off integrating the old Sector Boards into the new focusou s. He pointed out that this is a difference in focus but by using some of these � p new methods, it should give a wider spectrum of citizen participation. Vice Mayor LaSala agreed that it is time to bring in"new blood" and the recommendation to give people a chance to serve that haven't had a chance. He agreed with the recommendation of dissolving the Sector Boards and to allow for more community input on development. Mr. Sinclair stated that the Town Council will appoint members to the Steering Committee and he suggested that Council may want to consider appointing the members as they did for the Naranj a Site Plan Committee. Mayor Loomis stated that the Sector Boards helped give a voice for all areas of Oro Valley and they helped to maintain a focus. He stated the person that lives in the area has a sense of what is needed. Discussion followed on the proposed consultant costs and anticipated costs for P & Z departmental costs. Mr. Nodine stated that $380,000 includes public participation,plan drafting and staff work. The consultant component of$260,000, with $90,000 being the public participation plan. He estimated $25,000 as the cost for P &Z staff involvement. Planning Process &Phases Phase I: Initiation, Issue Identification and Visioning Phase II: Alternatives Evaluation for Future Growth Phase III: Draft Plan Elements & Implementation Phase IV: Approval and Ratification 6/28/01 Minutes, Council Special/Study Session 4 Update Existing Elements • Land Use (Required) • Circulation,Bicycle/Pedestrian Alternate Mode and Transit (Required) ❖ Housing(OV) + Parks &Recreation (OV) • Open Space &Natural Resources Conservation (Required) + Economic Development (OV) + Public Safety, Facilities and Services (OV) + Community Design (OV) + Cultural &Historic Resources (OV) New Required Growing Smarter Elements • Growth Area • Environmental Planning • Cost of Development • Water Resources • Open Space Ms. Shaw reviewed the planning process for all of the elements. In response to a question by Mayor Loomis, Ms. Shaw replied that yes, the Town could refer to our existing master plans and use what we can in the General Plan Document. Mr. Nodine recommended summarizing each plan in the General Plan to help educate the public. Mayor Loomis entertained comments from the floor. Bill Adler, 10720 N. Eagle Eye Place. Mr. Adler referred to the Public Participation Plan and stated that there is no provision with the process that has been described that allows forp articipants to agree with the final outcome. He asked that if committees are working on various components of the Plan, then they should have an opportunity to approve the draft document before it goes to the Town Council for adoption. In response to a question by Mayor Loomis, Brent Sinclair stated that there are 10 steering committee meetings scheduled throughout the process. He stated that anyone on a committee can make themselves available to offer their input during a steering committee meeting where the various components will be presented. Mr. Nodine stated that every time a draft is developed, it will be placed on the Town's Web Site and the public will be able to look at the portion of the document that they are interested in. In response to a question by Vice Mayor LaSala, Mr. Sinclair stressed that there will be plenty of opportunities for the public to participate in this process. He pointed out that the Steering Committee and the Technical Advisory Committee are the formal 6/28/01 Minutes,Council Special/Study Session 5 committees that will be established to approve and make recommendations to the Planning Commission and to the Town Council. He stated that the purpose of having the Focus Groups is to come to a consensus on these issues. MOTION: Council Member Wolff MOVED to approve the proposed revisions to the Public Participation Plan as presented with the previous June 28, 2001 Council Communication. MOTION SECONDED by Council Member Rochman. Discussion followed regarding Sector Boards and the proposed process. Mr. Sinclair stated that the Steering Committee would be the opportunity to get representation in the same way as it was done with the Sector Boards during the last General Plan update process. MOTION carried 3 — 1 with Mayor Loomis opposed. MOTION: Council Member Rochman MOVED to approve the Scope of Work for the General Plan Update as presented with the previous June 29, 2001 Council Communication. MOTION SECONDED by Vice Mayor LaSala. MOTION carried 3 — 1 with Mayor Loomis opposed. REVIEW OF DRAFT AMENDMENT TO 2001 PLANNING AND ZONING WORK PLAN PlanningZoning& Director Bryant Nodine submitted a revised 2001 Planning & Zoning Work Plan and reviewed its contents. He stated that the second page shows work plan items that he is recommending be put on hold until the completion of the General Plan. He stated that they are looking at existing additional staff resources that may be needed for the General Plan, and therefore, these items would not be completed this year. Mayor Loomis asked that estimated completion dates be added to the items listed on Page 2 that are currently shown as "on hold"until May of 2002. Mr. Nodine stated he would like to bring these back to re-prioritize after the bulk of the General Plan is completed. MOTION: A motion was made by Mayor Loomis to approve the Planning & Zoning Work Plan with direction to add dates to the "on-hold"items and bring back to the Town Council in August. MOTION SECONDED by Vice Mayor LaSala. Discussion RESOLUTION NO. (R)01-59 APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT FOR SERVICES WITH ENTRANCO, INC. REGARDING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES IN REGARDS TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE (2001-02) Vice Mayor LaSala MOVED to continue this item until the regular Town Council y meeting of July 18, 2001 and direct staff to continue to negotiate an acceptable contract for the General Plan update. MOTION SECONDED by Council Member Wolff. MOTION carried 4—0. 6/28/01 Minutes,Council Special/Study Session 6 ADJOURNMENT Vice Mayor LaSala MOVED to adjourn the meeting at 8:50 p.m. MOTION SECONDED by Council Member Wolff. MOTION carried 4—0. Respectfully submitted, Kathryn E. Cuvelier, CMC Town Clerk I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the study/special session of the Town of Oro Valley Council of Oro Valley, Arizona held on the 28th day of June, 2001. I further certify that the meeting was duly called and held and that a quorum was present. Dated this day of ,2001. Kathryn E. Cuvelier,CMC Town Clerk MINUTESFr 3 ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION JULY 18, 2001 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11,000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE REGULAR SESSION CALL TO ORDER - 7:05 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT Paul Loomis,Mayor Fran LaSala, Vice Mayor Bart Rochman, Council Member Werner Wolff, Council Member EXCUSED: Dick Johnson, Council Member PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Loomis led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS Town Manager Chuck Sweet reviewed the upcoming meetings. CALL TO AUDIENCE No speakers. 1. CONSENT AGENDA MOTION: Vice Mayor LaSala MOVED to APPROVE the Consent Agenda as presented. The motion was SECONDED by Council Member Rochman. Motion carried, 4-0. A. Minutes— 5-30-01; 6-11-01; 6-13-01; 6-20-01 B. Finance Report—May 31, 2001 C. Police Report—May 2001 D. Coyote Run Monthly Report—June 2001 E. Building Safety Activity Report—June 2001 F. Resolution No. (R)01-60 Authorizing execution of an Agreement between the United States Department of the Interior(Bureau of Reclamation) and the Town of Oro Valley, the Town of Marana, the Metropolitan Domestic Water Improvement District, and the Flowing Wells Irrigation District in order to provide funds and/or services to supplement available appropriated federal funds for the Southern Arizona 07/18/01 Minutes,Council Regular Session 2 Regional Water Management Study to implement the "Reverse Osmosis with Slow-sand Filtration"Pilot Water Treatment Study G. Resolution No. (R) 01-61 A Resolution of the Town of Oro Valley, Pima County, Arizona, authorizing and approving a contract with Brown and Caldwell to conduct an Exploratory Boring Analysis at Water Plant#4 in the amount of$50,950.00 H. Resolution No. (R)01-62 Authorizing and approving a contract with WestLand Resources, Inc. for professional engineering design and construction period services for two new booster stations, at Big Wash Water Plant#1 in the amount of$136,500.00 I. Resolution No. (R)01-63 Authorizing and approving a contract with WestLand Resources, Inc. for professional engineering design and construction period services for new Countryside Booster Station and 16" Main Extension from Water Plant#3 to Bald Eagle in the amount of $106,000.00 J. Resolution No. (R)01-64 Approving the renewal of an Intergovernmental Agreement with Pima County for the payment of costs of incarceration of municipal prisoners in the Pima County Jail K. Resolution No. (R)01-65 Project No. OV 30-00/01 05 Acceptance of Bid and Award of Contract for the Rancho Vistoso Pavement Rehabilitation from Oracle Road to Big Wash to Southern Arizona Paving in the amount of$369,995.71 L. Project No. W40-2001 Award of Contract to NAC Construction for Oro Valley Water Utility OV #1 Priorities B & C Valle Del Oro Main extension in the amount of$523,506.00 M. Appointment of replacement members to the Oro Valley Transit Task Force N. OV12-99-14 Approval of Substitute Assurance Agreement between Monterey Homes Construction, Inc., and First American Title Insurance as trustee of Mira Vista, Lots 48, 49 & 50 0. OV5-01-04 Approval of public art for the Canada Hills Retail Shops located on the southwest corner of La Canada Drive &Naranja Drive, Parcel 224-240-09T P. OV5-01-01 Approval of public art for the Walgreens Center located on the southwest corner of First Avenue and Tangerine Road, Parcel 224- 021-700 Q. Application for inclusion to the Oro Valley Water Utility Service Area by Arizona District Council of the Assemblies of God, Inc. located at 2350 W. Tangerine Road 2. PRESENTATION OF SERVICE PLAQUES TO OUTGOING BOARD & COMMISSION MEMBERS Mayor Loomis presented plaques to Mr. James Swan, Mr. Vito Tedeschi, and Ms. Becky Blankenship in recognition of their volunteer service to the Town. Ms. Karen Baker, 07/18/01 Minutes,Council Regular Session 3 Ms. Jo Grant, Mr. Dennis Douglas, Mr. Wayne Wiant, and Mr. Louis Dudas were not present to receive their Service Plaques. 3. APPOINTMENT OF MEMBERS TO THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MOTION: Council Member Rochman MOVED to APPOINT Richard Underwood, Nancy Mager, and Al Kunisch to the Development Review Board with their terms r exP iin June 30, 2003. Vice Mayor LaSala SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, g 4-0. 4. RESOLUTION NO. (R)01-66 CALL OF ELECTION FOR REFERENDUM NO. 01-02 Town Clerk Kathryn Cuvelier reviewed the Council Communication and explained that theetitions for a referendum have been certified to be placed on a ballot. In accordance p with the Town Code, the Mayor and Council could choose to: 1) Call a special election for November 6, 2001, 2) Call the election for the March 12, 2002 Primary Election, or 3) Do not call a special election which would automatically place the referendum on the next ensuing General Election of May 21, 2002. Mayor Loomis opened the floor for public comment. Hector Conde, 14040 N. Lobelia Way, recommended that the Council select the election date that would be the least costly for the Town. He suggested that they combine the referendum with the Council election in March 2002. Discussion followed regarding the possibility of an all mail ballot, importance of allowing citizens to vote at the election polls, and the deadline requirements for the November and March elections. MOTION: Vice Mayor LaSala MOVED to APPROVE Resolution No. (R)01-66, designating the election date of March 12, 2002 as the date to place Referendum No. 01- 02 on the ballot. Mayor Loomis SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 4—0. 5. PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION NO. (R)01-67 APPROVING THE ADOPTION OF THE FINAL BUDGET OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002 Finance Director David Andrews reviewed the Council Communication. He explained that on June 20, 2001, the Council adopted the tentative budget and set the local expenditure limitation for fiscal year 2001/2002 in the amount of$92,388,958. He stated that adoption of Resolution No. (R)01-67 would adopt the final budget in the same amount. Mr. Andrews also explained that the final budget is the same as the tentative budget with the exception of the recommendation of the Town Manager to provide seed 07/18/01 Minutes,Council Regular Session 4 money to the Friends of the Oro Valley Public Library in the amount of$7,400 (verses the $9,200 requested amount.) Town Manager Chuck Sweet explained that he has recommended the reduction in seed money after studying details of the Friends of the Oro Valley Library request. He also reported that the group is now a corporation- Friends of the Oro Valley Public Library, Inc. Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. Jayne Kuennemeier, 14128 N. Fawnbrooke Drive, Chairperson for the Friends of the Oro Valley Public Library, Inc., thanked the Council, staff, and the Library Committee for their help. She also explained that the "Friends" are now a non-profit corporation. She also reported that they would be holding a book sale at the Fall Jazz Festival to raise funds and they have already received books and donations from several sources towards the book sale. Mayor Loomis closed the public hearing. MOTION: Council Member Rochman MOVED to APPROVE Resolution NO. (R)01- 67, adopting the Final Budget for fiscal year 2001/2002 including the Town Manager's recommendation to provide seed money to the Friends of the Oro Valley Public Library, Inc. in the amount of$7,400. Council Member Wolff SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 4-0. 6. CONSIDERATION AND/OR APPROVAL OF TOWN DEPARTMENT'S PERFORMANCE GOALS & MEASURES FOR FY 2001/2002 Town Manager Chuck Sweet explained that a draft of departmental performance goals and measures were presented to the Council with the Manager's Recommended Budget on April 30, 2001. Those goals and measures were refined as staff moved though the Town Council's budget review sessions. Mr. Sweet then reviewed recommended changes to the Departmental Goals and Performance Measures. Mr. Sweet explained that the each department would track its actual performance to these measures and would provide a quarterly report to the Town Manager's Office. Mayor Loomis stated that some of the goals were set very high and several set low. He suggested that as staff worked through the process of tracking their Goals and Performance Measures,that they may need to adjust them over the next year or two. MOTION: Council Member Wolff MOVED to APPROVE the Town Department's Performance Goals and Measures for fiscal year 2001/2002 as submitted and modified by the Town Manager. Vice Mayor LaSala SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 4—0. 07/18/01 Minutes, Council Regular Session 5 7. PUBLIC HEARING —RESOLUTION NO. (R)01-68 A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA TO INCREASE WATER RATES FOR THE ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY Water Utility Administrator Shirley Seng presented an overview of the rate setting process. She presented reasons for the recommended water rate increase as: existing water system improvements ($13 million over a 5 year period) removal of golf courses from groundwater($1.2 million loss of revenue,) the acquisition of water rights ($5 million for FY 2001-2002) and increased operating costs. She explained that the incremental rate increases would help cover the overall increase in costs and avoid"rate shock" in the future. Ms. Seng reviewed a chart depicting the Water Utility Budget for fiscal year 2001-2002. Items represented were: ■ Capital Improvements Projects - $6.3 million ■ Water Rights - $5 million • Debt Services - $2.9 million • Personnel - $1.4 million ■ Power - $ 900,000 • Operating &Maintenance - $1.5 million • Depreciation - $1.4 million Ms. Seng stated that in order to meet the proposed revenue increase, the Water Utility Commission (WUC) and staff are recommending a 7%revenue increase. The recommended scenario (Scenario AA7) would provide sufficient revenue that meets expenses and debt service coverage, provides net income for four of the five years, and cash reserves at a minimum of 15% of expenses. Ms. Seng stated that to achieve the recommended 7%revenue increase, the WUC and staff are recommending the proposed Rate Design RS-4 which would provide a change in the base rate, the commodity rates and the usage allowed in each tier structure. She explained that these changes would allow the Utility to be more competitive, they encourage conservation and allow progress towards cost recovery. Ms. Seng reviewed the recommended rate design under RS-4 (for a 5/8 x3/4 inch meter)which would provide a 6.67% overall increase in the Base Rate (1,000 gallons,) a 6.74% increase in Tier 1 (1,001 — 10,000 gallons,) and a 12.98% increase for Tier 2 (10,001 —25,000 gallons.) Ms. Seng also reviewed an alternative Rate Design (RS-4A) which would provide an overall rate increase of 4.9% in the Base Rate (1,000 gallons,) a 5.06% increase in Tier 1 (1,001 — 8,000 gallons,) and a 12.98 % increase in Tier 2 (8,001 — 16,000 gallons.) She explained that the gallon usage in the tiers would remain as it currently exists. She stated that this design still encourages conservation but it would increase reliance on commodity sales, which creates a more volatile revenue stream and slow the cost recovery process. 07/18/01 Minutes, Council Regular Session 6 Ms. Seng then stated that the WUC and staff are recommending Scenario AA7 (7% revenue increase) to be achieved by implementing Rate Design RS-4 (6.7%rate increase.) In response to questions from the Council, Ms. Seng explained that both rate structures would produce a 7% increase for Year 1 only and that the rates would need to be adjusted each year after that to mitigate losses. She also stated that both rate scenarios would meet the financial criteria that have been established by the Town Council for the Water Utility. She further explained that commercial development had been accounted for in their rate analysis. Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. Anne Britt, 9601 N. Calle Buena Vista, stated that she had concerns with the recommended rate increase to the residents as she felt that the golf courses were being given lower rates. She stated that she felt that the increase to the residents was to make up for any loss realized by lower rates given to golf courses. She said that she was in favor of bringing in Central Arizona Project (CAP) water. She stated that she was not opposed to the rate increase and thought that it was needed but she asked that the benefit she felt was being given to golf courses be looked at. Ms. Britt also stated that she felt that there was a discrepancy in the actual rates being currently charged and the tables that were provided to customers by the Water Utility. Ihor Kunash, 11168 N. Mountain Breeze, stated that it seemed to him that those that used the least amount of water were going to realize the greater rate increase. He stated that he felt that this did not reward those who conserve. He also questioned the costs associated with removing the golf courses off ground water. Mayor Loomis closed the public hearing. Ms. Seng explained that regarding Ms. Britt's concern over the discrepancies in the actual rates verses the charted rates, sales tax and superfund tax were not included in the table. The table only reflected water charges. She also explained that the issue with the different percentages as one moves into the larger amounts of water usage is explained by the fact that the water usage allowed in each Tier has been changed. Those users are paying more for their water, but the percentage increase is lower as their original bill was larger in the beginning. She stated that "dollar for dollar, if you use more you are going to pay more." In response to a question from Vice Mayor LaSala, Water Utility Director Alan Forrest explained that the golf courses are on the same rate schedule as residents. However, through the purchase of the Rancho Vistoso Water Company, a negotiated agreement provided for a special rate for the two golf courses located in Rancho Vistoso until the Town provides for alternate water. He also explained that currently the golf courses are part of the revenue stream for the potable water system. Five-year projections are providing for a separate non-potable water system. The revenue stream that we now have 07/18/01 Minutes,Council Regular Session 7 from the golf courses that goes into the potable water system will be shifted to the non- potable system. He explained that if you look at just the potable system, you would see a net decrease in the revenue stream. However, the golf courses will be charged for water and will pay for that service, it will just go into a different fund. Therefore, you see a net decrease in the potable system of$1.2 million. MOTION: Vice Mayor LaSala MOVED to APPROVE Resolution No. (R)01-68, a Resolution of the Town of Oro Valley to increase water rates for the Oro Valley Water Utility, attaching as Exhibit "A"the set of rate schedules associated with Rate Design RS-4. (Exhibit"A"is attached to the end of the minutes.) DISCUSSION: Mayor Loomis stated that he was in favor of Rate Design RS-4 because he was not in favor of having a low increase this year and then having to implement a 10%-12%in the years to come. He stated that he wanted to maintain as low an increase as possible but still be able to meet the established financial criteria. He also thanked the Water Utility Finance Subcommittee and staff for their work. Council Member Rochman SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 4—0. Mayor Loomis recessed the meeting at 8:15 p.m. The meeting resumed at 8:30 p.m. 8. RESOLUTION NO. (R)01-69 CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF A FINANCIAL PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT WITH THE GREATER TUCSON ECONOMIC COUNCIL Finance Director David Andrews stated that approval of Resolution No. (R)01-69 would extend the Financial Participation Agreement with the Greater Tucson Economic Council (GTEC.) He then introduced Mr. Steve Weathers, the new President of GTEC. Steve Weathers, 33 N. Stone, President and CEO of GTEC, thanked the Town for its past support. MOTION: Council Member Rochman MOVED to APPROVE Resolution No. (R)01-69 executing a Financial Participation Agreement between the Town of Oro Valley and the Greater Tucson Economic Council. Vice Mayor LaSala SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 4—0. 9. RESOLUTION NO. (R)01-70 CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF A FINANCIAL PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT WITH THE METROPOLITAN TUCSON CONVENTION AND VISITORS BUREAU Finance Director David Andrews stated that approval of Resolution No. (R)01-70 would renew the Financial Participation Agreement with the Metropolitan Tucson Convention and Visitors Bureau(MTCVB.) 07/18/01 Minutes,Council Regular Session 8 Paul Kanez, 10,000 N. Oracle Road, Director of Sales and Marketing at the Sheraton El Conquistador, stated that they have had a wonderful working relationship with MTCVB. He explained that in the years 2000-2001 they will see an economic impact at the resort of over $11 million in guest services and amenities. He stated that future bookings are showing an impact of over$13 million. Mr. Kanez stated that he looked forward to working with the MTCVB. He urged Council's support of the resolution. MOTION: Council Member Rochman MOVED to APPROVE Resolution No. (R)01-70 executing a Financial Participation Agreement between the Town of Oro Valley and the Metropolitan Tucson Convention and Visitors Bureau. Council Member Wolff SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 4—0. 10. PUBLIC HEARING—ORDINANCE NO. (0)01-20 OV11-01-01 REQUEST TO AMEND THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY GENERAL PLAN FOR A PORTION OF RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 11 BORDERED ON THE EAST, NORTH AND WEST SIDES BY THE TOWN BOUNDARY AND BY STONE CANYON II, III AND IV ON THE SOUTH Planning and Zoning Administrator Bryant Nodine reviewed overhead maps of a portion of Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 11 depicting the area where the applicant has requested a change in the General Plan land use designation. The requested change is for approximately 60 acres of Parks/Open Space and Rural Low Density Residential to Low Density Residential and adding an additional 80—90 units in the north central area. Mr. Nodine reviewed the four Findings of Fact that are considered when granting a General Plan amendment and staff's analysis of each as follows: 1) The amendment constitutes an overall improvement to the general plan and is not solely for the benefit of a particular landowner or owners a particular point in time. - The benefits for changing the land use designation to the Town will be derived from the considerations in Exhibit "A"which balance the loss of open space and help to mitigate the impacts of development. • Residential development that provides a relatively high tax base for the services that are required and a relatively large, one-time fiscal impact from construction sales tax and fees; • Enhancement of the Town's image and character as a destination, resort community; and, • Development that will help to attract high-end, specialty retail investment 2) The amendment is consistent with the vision, goals, and policies of the General Plan. • Staff has evaluated this proposal against the goals and policies of the General Plan and finds that the proposal (with the considerations in Exhibit"A") conforms to 21 of the 26 applicable policies from the General Plan Conformance Check Sheet.) 07/18/01 Minutes,Council Regular Session 9 3) The General Plan Land Use map does not provide appropriate optional sites for the use proposed in the amendment. • The development of the golf course and a five-star, high-end resort in Neighborhood 11 has altered the land uses in this area. The General Plan Land Use Map does not provide optional sites for development of this kind of high-end, low-density housing with a golf course and resort. 4) The amendment will not adversely impact the community as a whole, or a portion of the community without an acceptable means of mitigating these impacts through the subsequent zoning and development process. • Amending the General Plan Land Use Map designation to a higher density may have adverse impacts on the environmentally sensitive areas of the Town and adjoining areas to the west, north and east. In evaluating this amendment, mitigation of impacts was considered by adding development standards to the considerations attached in Exhibit ,,A.,, Mr. Nodine explained that with the considerations as provided for in Exhibit"A" (some of which provide for open space trades, dedication of a trail, and development standards to mitigate the impacts of development,) the General Plan amendment is being recommended for approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission and staff. In response to questions from Council, Mr. Nodine explained that the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development (PAD) set the zoning as Open Space and the General Plan also has designated that area as Open Space. He also explained that the 55 acres he referenced is the actual area that is being proposed for change to Low Density Residential. The 90 acres is staff's assessment on total impact on Open Space based on fragmentation, pulling out areas that are currently connected and making them "islands or small peninsulas." Mr. Nodine also explained that they are proposing a consideration in a PAD amendment to allow for a trade of land to balance the loss of Open Space. He explained that the PAD has one trail on the west-side of the property that runs along Agua Canada Wash. Mr. Nodine also explained that there is a plan for the Town and a desire for a trail that would start in that same area and run through Stone Canyon up to the northern area that is being proposed for a change. However, that is part of the POST Plan (Parks, Opens Space and Trails) and the Pima County Eastern Trails Plan and not a part of the PAD. He stated that it is a historic trail. Mayor Loomis confirmed with Mr. Nodine that the exhibits reflected in the Ordinance should include Exhibits "B" and "C'. In response to a question from Mayor Loomis, Mr. Nodine explained that the area in the northeast corner of Neighborhood 11 was not identified as a dedication to the Town. He explained that it was offered by the applicant, but staff did not provide that as a 07/18/01 Minutes,Council Regular Session 10 consideration because they felt that it was a very strong offer and it was felt that the applicant would dedicate that area in the future. Charles Hulsey, The WLB Group,representing the applicant, Vistoso Partners, reviewed a presentation depicting the portion of Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 11 being considered for a General Plan amendment. He reviewed the areas that they request be considered as Open Space and buildable areas. He explained that the buildable areas were defined by reviewing the Harris Environmental Study and an evaluation of the topography and vegetation of the area. He explained that the property lines could extend into the Open Space area but the buildable areas would not. The development areas would be restricted to no greater than 20,000 square feet on each lot and there would be no perimeter walls that would block wildlife movement. Mr. Hulsey also reviewed the riparian areas and stated that they have rearranged lots to preserve those washes. He - reviewed an area on the map that Vistoso Partners has agreed to deed to the Town which would allow one more segment of the Honey Bee Wash to be in the Town's ownership. Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. Bill Adler, 10720 N. Eagle Eye Place, stated that he was opposed to the General Plan amendment initiation. He stated that the property being considered was identified for consideration in the General Plan update. It is identified as being controversial and should be allowed to have public resolution. He stated that he felt that the four Findings of Fact have not been met. He was against lotting into Open Space and he was in favor of the area being commonly owned. He stated that if development is allowed, it should remain at the lowest designation, Rural Low Density Residential. Joan Eerkes, 12651 N. Como Drive, stated that she was a member of the General Plan Sector Board. She stated that she was against any change. She stated that the Sector Boards worked hard to satisfy as many people in many different ways as possible and concessions and compromises were made at that time. She stated that the area is extremely rugged,beautiful,riparian and wild and it should remain as Open Space. She also asked if golf courses are considered as Open Space and stated that if they are, they should not be considered as such. She also asked for access to the trail. Robert Rubino, 13878 N. Lobelia Way, stated that he agreed with the former speakers and stated that he was also opposed to the General Plan amendments. He stated that he felt that the Town was being taken a piece at a time. He asked how many times the General Plan was going to come up for discussion and stated that it should not be a starting point for negotiations. Hector Conde, 14040 N. Lobelia Way, stated that was opposed to the General Plan amendment. He felt that the General Plan conformance was being misinterpreted and that the four Findings of Fact were not met. He stated that the trade offering was not a good trade for the Town. He stated that the PAD was a twelve-year old contract between the developer and the Town and it should be honored. 07/18/01 Minutes,Council Regular Session 11 Karen Rogers, 1815 E. Starmist Place, stated that she was incensed that the Town would amend something that the citizens had written (General Plan.) She stated it seemed that Vistoso Partners always wanted to change the PAD,but it should remain as adopted in 1986. She asked who would have access to the proposed trail. Ms. Rogers also stated that the Open Space seems to be cut in half and she was against the Open Space being segregated. Mayor Loomis closed the public hearing. MOTION: Vice Mayor LaSala MOVED to ADOPT Ordinance (0)01-20, amendments to the 1996 General Plan changing the land use designation on the northern portion of a parcel known as Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 11 effective on the date of satisfaction of completion of the considerations in Exhibit"A" and striking the words "development - standards"from Exhibit "A". The motion was SECONDED by Mayor Loomis with the request for additional changes. AMENDMENTS TO THE MOTION: Mayor Loomis asked that Section 1 of the Ordinance include the wording Exhibit"B" and "C" and that an additional condition be added that Vistoso Partners will dedicate the area from the south and west ridgeline of Honey Bee Wash, or from 300' south and west of the centerline of the wash, whichever is less,to the north and east boundaries of the property. He also asked that the wording"of their circumference"be added to consideration#6 (amended consideration renumbered and is now#7.) Exhibit"A" (as amended) At the time of PAD amendment 1. Vistoso Partners will secure and dedicate to the Town the ITC Area(in the north RV Neighborhood 12 area). 2. Vistoso Partners will dedicate land within their property for, and provide funds to construct, a trail system starting from a two-acre trailhead near the southwest portion of Neighborhood 11 and connecting, via northern Honey Bee Wash, to Honey Bee Canyon Park. The trailhead and the trail alignment will be that which is acceptable to the Town in consultation with Pima County Parks and Recreation. 3. Vistoso Partners will dedicate an acceptable site for a water reservoir in neighborhood 11. The General Plan designation for that site will be amended to Public/Semi Public by this amendment. 4. Vistoso Partners will dedicate the area from the south and west ridgeline of Honey Bee Wash, or from 300' south and west of the centerline of the wash, whichever is less, to the north and east boundaries of the property. 5. There will be at least 300 feet wide contiguous areas of open space left as wildlife corridors along riparian areas unless mitigation measures or existing conditions (topography, vegetation, etc.) adequately buffer the riparian areas from the effects (lights, noise, etc.) of development. i i 07/18/01 Minutes,Council Regular Session 12 6. All street crossing of riparian areas shall be designed to be wildlife friendly by providing: a. shrubs up to the shoulders b. speed limits of 15-20 mph c. culverts or other structures where the length is no more than two times the width (for wider roads [longer crossings] this may mean providing a light well at the median) d. sandy-bottomed, square culverts or at least large, sandy bottomed, Y2 or 1/4 round culverts e. As an option, a 2'-3' culvert-type crossing for smaller animals such as javelina in conjunction with an area on either side of the drainage level with the roadway-and enhanced with vegetation to provide an area where larger animals can cross. f. as an option,pavement materials that mimic native materials 7. All rock outcrops identified in the Harris Study shall have 50 feet buffer around at least 75% of their circumference. 8. No buildings shall be visible from the floodplain of Honey Bee Wash. 9. Grading limits of no more than 20,000 square feet shall be imposed on all lots. Other 10. The approval of this General Plan amendment does not constitute an approval of the number of lots or the layout of lots as submitted, which will be evaluated at the PAD amendment request. In particular those lots in the northern area of the proposal will be evaluated to determine if there is an adequate buffer to the public lands and wildlife corridors. DISCUSSION: Vice Mayor LaSala stated that he wanted to put all biases aside and do what was best for the Town. He stated that knowing the realities of the situation in Neighborhood 11,he could say that without a doubt, this was the best deal that the Town could come across. He said that Neighborhood 11 would get developed but the Town would also get open space and a trail that everyone would have access too. Mayor Loomis stated that things continue to change. When the Rancho Vistoso PAD and the General Plan were adopted, the concept of Stone Canyon did not even exist. He stated that the area is private property, and Council has to look at it to see if there is something that can be moved out of private property and made it accessible to the public. MOTION carried, 4—0. Mayor Loomis recessed the meeting at 9:30 p.m. The meeting resumed at 9:40 p.m. 11. PUBLIC HEARING—ORDINANCE NO. (0)01-21 OV11-01-02 REQUEST TO AMEND THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY GENERAL PLAN FOR THE AREA KNOWN AS RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 12,LOCATED NORTH OF 07/18/01 Minutes,Council Regular Session 13 RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD IN THE NOTCH FORMED BY THE TOWN BOUNDARIES BETWEEN RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOODS 11 & 13 Planning and Zoning Administrator Bryant Nodine reviewed overhead maps depicting Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 12 and the proposal for development. He explained that the applicant is requesting an amendment to the General Plan Land use. The current designation is for Low Density Residential (LDR) (182 acres) and Parks and Open Space (177 acres) with a back up designation of Rural Low Density Reserve. The requested change would allow the Parks and Open Space designation to be split to allow approximately 90 acres to remain Parks and Open Space and 90 acres to be changed to LDR(.4 -. 5 dwelling units per acre.) Current Low Density Residential designation would be split to allow approximately 90 acres to remain as LDR, 60 acres to Parks and Open Space, 23 acres to Medium Density Residential (for-resort casitas) and 13 acres to Resort for resort parking. Mr. Nodine further explained that the property is currently zoned in Pima County as R-H (one home per approximately four acres.) Mr. Nodine explained that a portion of the area has been approved for parking for the future resort. He also pointed out the area being proposed for Medium Residential to allow for casitas for the future resort. He then reviewed a comparison of possible dwelling units in each designation which could change from 120 units in the LDR area where the General Plan allows for approximately 80-100 units and approximately 57 units in the Parks and Open Space area where 0-50 units are allowed under the current designation. Mr. Nodine reviewed the four Findings of Fact that are considered when granting a General Plan amendment and staff's analysis of each as follows: 1) The amendment constitutes an overall improvement to the general plan and is not solely for the benefit of a particular landowner or owners at a particular point in time. • The proposal is consistent in terms of housing units with the General Plan for those areas currently designated LDR. In those areas the proposal is an improvement to the plan because it recognizes the approved resort (see Finding of Fact#3 below),provides open space, clustering, support for the resort and a housing product (casitas) related to the resort. • In the northern area, the proposed amendment increases housing units and affects open space. The proposed plan for 57 residential housing units in the POS district is higher than the maximum housing units possible under the General Plan (as shown in the previous Table). The amendment in the northern area primarily benefits the applicant,but does provide the following benefits to the Town: • residential development that provides a relatively high tax base compared to the services that are required; • development that provides a large, one-time fiscal impact from construction sales tax and fees; • enhancement of the Town's destination resort image and character; and, 07/18/01 Minutes,Council Regular Session 14 • development that will help to attract high-end, specialty retail investment. ■ The applicant can mitigate the impact on open space among other things by: • redesigning the proposal to decrease number of housing units • redesigning the proposal to provide larger areas of open spaces, which are wildlife friendly. • providing open space areas in other parts of the Town that would benefit the community. Mr. Nodine explained that the considerations recommended by Staff in Exhibit 'A' addresses the latter two issues and results in an overall benefit to the Town. (2 That the amendment is consistent with the vision, goals, and policies of the General Plan. ■ Staff has evaluated this proposal against the goals and policies of the General Plan and finds that the proposal conforms to 23 of the 26 applicable policies in the General Plan Conformance Checksheet. (3 The general plan land use map does not provide appropriate optional sites for the use proposed in the amendment. ■ Development of the Ritz resort in Rancho Vistoso NH 11 along the western side of this project area started with an approval of General Plan amendment in 1998. The proposal for 13 acres of resort designation and 23 acres of medium density residential is specific to the approved resort and could not be provided elsewhere. The low density residential is an extension of the Stone Canyon Development tied to the Golf Club, and to a lesser extent to the resort. The General Plan does not provide appropriate optional sites for development of this kind of high-end, low-density residential near a golf course and resort area. (4 The amendment will not adversely impact the community as a whole, or a portion of the community without an acceptable means of mitigating these impacts through the subsequent zoning and development process. ■ Amending the General Plan to allow the additional units in the northern area may have some adverse impacts on the environment. Adding development standards to the proposal, such as those in Exhibit "A", can mitigate these impacts. Mr. Nodine stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission and staff recommend approval of the General Plan amendment for Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 12 with the considerations in Exhibit "A". Mayor Loomis confirmed with Mr. Nodine that the exhibits reflected in the Ordinance should include Exhibits "B", "C" and "D". He also requested that the maps on Exhibit 07/18/01 Minutes, Council Regular Session 15 "C"be revised to show cross-hatching in the colored areas for easy identification when the exhibit is copied. In response to a question from Mayor Loomis,Mr. Nodine explained that the application clearly designates 88 dwelling units (casitas) in the Medium Density Residential area and those units would meet the requirements of the area. Charles Hulsey, The WLB Group, representing the applicant, Vistoso Partners, explained that the 88 casitas (four-plexes)would provide additional units around the proposed resort site. He stated that it might not be a full 88 units when the final project is designed. He explained that as far as the General Plan amendment is concerned, the applicant is asking for a Medium Density Residential designation. He explained that the applicant would like to build in the areas that are buildable and leave the open space, slopes, etc. alone. Mr. Hulsey explained that the request would allow a continuation of Stone Canyon around the resort area. In response to questions from Mayor Loomis, Mr. Hulsey explained that the property being considered is not in the Rancho Vistoso PAD and is currently zoned in Pima County as Low Density (one unit per four acres). Mayor Loomis reiterated that this request was not for a zoning change but was a request for a desired land use change. He than asked Mr. Hulsey what they would be proposing as possible dwelling units. Mr. Hulsey explained that they are proposing 197 units, which includes the casitas. Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. Jan Johnson, 3885 E. Golder Ranch Drive, stated that she would like to see a looped trail coming from the trail in Neighborhood 11 into Honey Bee Canyon in Neighborhood 12. She also expressed concerns that if the trail were moved from Vistoso land to State land that there may be confusion as how that may actually take place and where funding would come from to provide for trail access. Bill Adler, 10720 N. Eagle Eye Place, stated that the Findings of Fact are not being met and the General Plan amendment consideration is out of order. He expressed concern that the citizens are not being allowed a say on how the property would be developed and the General Plan was being ignored. Mayor Loomis closed the public hearing. In response to a question from Mayor Loomis, Mr. Nodine stated that the items being proposed regarding the resort are allowed uses within the existing County zoning. MOTION: Mayor Loomis MOVED to APPROVE the amendments and ADOPT Ordinance (0)01-21, with changes to the Ordinance to add Exhibit"D" (as a point of 07/18/01 Minutes,Council Regular Session 16 reference) and to revise Exhibit"C" so multiple designations will show up when printed. Council Member Rochman SECONDED the motion. DISCUSSION: Mayor Loomis highlighted Item 9 of the Exhibit"A" (The approval of this General Plan amendment does not constitute an approval of the number of lots or the layout of lots as submitted, which will be evaluated at the PAD amendment request.) He stated that this would happen after the issue of annexation is resolved. AMENDMENT TO THE MOTION: Vice Mayor LaSala asked to have the words "Development Standards"removed from Exhibit"A". Mayor Loomis and Council Member Rochman agreed to the amendment. Exhibit"A" (as amended) At the time of PAD Amendment 1. Vistoso Partners will dedicate the Honey Bee Canyon Park Site to the Town. 2. Vistoso Partners will provide any reservoir sites, not already in place, to serve these developments 3. Vistoso Partners will dedicate an acceptable area in trade for any additional open space impacted as a result of the proposed PAD amendment, beyond what would be impacted acted through the development of existing entitlements. Areas such as, but not limited to, the Honey Bee Village Archaeological Site or designated riparian areas within Big Wash and the Honey Bee Wash that could be impacted by development, may be considered as acceptable. 4. Riparian areas within the development will be preserved with at least 300 feet wide areas of open space left as wildlife corridor unless existing conditions (topography, vegetation, etc.) or mitigation measures adequately buffer development impacts (lights,noise, etc.). 5. All street crossing of riparian areas shall be designed to be wildlife friendly by providing: g. shrubs up to the shoulders h. speed limits of 15-20 mph i. culverts or other structures where the length is no more than two times the width (for wider roads [longer crossings] this may mean providing a light well at the median) j. sandy-bottomed, square culverts or at least large, sandy bottomed, 1/2 or 1/4 round culverts k. as an option, a 2'-3' culvert-type crossing for smaller animals such as javelina in conjunction with an area on either side of the drainage level with the roadway and enhanced with vegetation to provide an area where larger animals can cross. 1. as an option,pavement materials that mimic native materials 07/18/01 Minutes,Council Regular Session 17 6. Rock outcrops comparable to those identified in the Harris Study (greater than 1,000 o square feet in area and higher than 10 feet) shall have 50 feet buffers around 75% of their circumference. 7. No development shall be visible from the floodplain of the Honey Bee Wash. 8. Grading limits of no more than 20,000 square feet shall be imposed on all lots. Other 9. The approval of this General Plan amendment does not constitute an approval of the number of lots or the layout of lots as submitted, which will be evaluated at the PAD amendment request. .MOTION carried, 4—0. 12. OV12-97-8B1 CANADA VISTA HOMES REQUEST TO REVISE THE FINAL PLAT TO INCREASE GRADING LIMITS FOR LOTS 1 —35 FOR VISTOSO ESTATES SUBDIVISION,LOCATED SOUTH OF MOORE ROAD, EAST OF VISTOSO RIDGE SUBDIVISION,AND NORTH OF MOONRIDGE SUBDIVISION Community Development Director Brent Sinclair reviewed an overhead map of the Vistoso Estates subdivision. He explained that the applicant is requesting an amendment to the Vistoso Estates Final Plat to increase grading limits from 10,000 square feet to 12,000 square feet for all lots within R1-10 and R1-20 zones. Steve Solomon, 12753 N. Walking Deer, stated that they are requesting the increase in grading limits to allow them more flexibility to better site the homes on the lots and to minimize the impact to the lots. He stated that 10,000 square feet severely limits their ability for placement without placing rip-rap or retaining walls on the lots due to slope issues. In response to a question from Mayor Loomis, Mr. Sinclair explained that General Note #26 is standard wording used in the past on similar requests. MOTION: Council Member Rochman MOVED to APPROVE 0V12-97-08B1, Revised Final Plat Vistoso Estates, lots 1-35, with General Note#26 revised as reflected on the Final Plat. (Revised General Note #26 reads: "A maximum of 12,000 square feet shall be graded on all lots within R1-10 and R1-20 zones. This shall include building pad, yard, pool areas,patio walls/fences, and all accessory buildings, not including driveways and utility trenching. All areas outside grading limits will remain as natural open space with the exception of landscape buffers and landscape easements,which may be altered as required by code.) Council Member Wolff SECONDED the motion. DISCUSSION: Mr. Solomon read the following into the record: "I understand and agree that the Town's consent to the modification of the plat does not grant permission to alter the rights of other property owners within the subdivision and any action take with respect to those owners, if any, is at my sole and exclusive risk." 07/18/01 Minutes,Council Regular Session 18 MOTION carried, 4—0. 13. OV12-00-01 ALBANESE-BROOKS ASSOCIATES REQUESTS APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR ORO VALLEY CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE SANCTUARY (PARCEL #225-11-290A),LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF CALLE CONCORDIA AND CALLE BUENA VISTA Community Development Director Brent Sinclair reviewed an overhead map of the Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene located on the northeast corner of Calle Concordia and Calle Buena Vista. He explained that the parcel consists of approximately nine acres and is zoned Private Schools and Churches (PS&C). He explained that the applicant is requesting approval of a development plan for the Church of the Nazarene to construct a sanctuary, a multi-purpose room, recreational facilities and expansion of current office facilities. Mr. Sinclair further reported that the project meets all zoning requirements. Mr. Sinclair stated that the only issue has to do with adequate fire flow and is addressed in Exhibit"A". He suggested that the wording `Golder Ranch Fire District' be changed to the 'Oro Valley Fire Marshall' in that exhibit. In response to a question from Mayor Loomis, Mr. Sinclair stated that the type of lighting on the proposed basketball/volleyball courts would be identified when building plans are submitted, but they will need to conform to Building Codes and Lighting Codes. He stated that additional buffers have been added to help mitigate some of the lighting overflow. Mayor Loomis also asked about hours of operation of the outdoor courts. Mr. Sinclair stated that they have not been addressed in the development plan. Brian Hagedorn, Albanese-Brooks, 5232 E. Pima Street, stated that he did not believe the church would have any problem with restrictions to the hours that the courts could be lit. He also explained that they would have shielded light fixtures and would not allow light spill-over off the property. Mayor Loomis suggested that the applicant look at the lighting on the courts at the CDO Riverfront Park. He also suggested that the hours of lighting on the courts be restricted to the same hours as the parks in the Town (lights out at 10:00 p.m.) MOTION: Vice Mayor LaSala MOVED to APPROVE OV12-00-01, Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene Development Plan, effective on the date of satisfaction of those conditions listed in Exhibit "A" adding that the lighting on the courts be turned of by 10:00 p.m. and changing the wording from `Golder Ranch Fire District' to 'Oro Valley Fire Marshall.' 07/18/01 Minutes,Council Regular Session 19 EXHIBIT "A" (as amended) 1. Church of the Nazarene shall work with the Oro Valley Water Utility and the Oro Valley Fire Marshall to plan and construct the necessary improvements to achieve adequate fire flow. Adequate fire flow as determined by the Oro Valley Fire Marshall, must be physically achieved within two (2) years of the Development Plan approval by the Town Council. 2. Court lighting shall be turned off by 10:00 p.m. Council Member Wolff SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 4—0. 14. REQUEST BY GOVERNMENT REVIEW TASK FORCE TO ISSUE A CITIZEN'S OPINION SURVEY REGARDING COUNCIL MEMBERSHIP (FROM 5—7 MEMBERS) Town Clerk Kathryn Cuvelier reviewed the Council Communication and explained that the Government Review Task Force is asking permission to send out a short survey to the Town's residents. This survey would provide needed opinions and perceptions on the question of Council membership expansion from five members to seven members. The Task Force is recommending that the survey be mailed out with the Town's water bills although about one thousand citizens are not on the Town's water system and would not be included in the mailing. The estimated cost of mailing the survey with the water bills would be $6,000. Mayor Loomis opened the floor for public comment. Bill Adler, 10720 N. Eagle Eye Place, stated that he felt that the citizens needed to be educated on the issue. The survey does not provide the needed facts and would be a waste of effort unless specific facts and issues were provided. Council Member Rochman stated that he wanted a better idea of what the citizens thought about the proposed expansion of Council membership. He agreed that information should be provided with the survey. He also suggested some minor changes to the proposed survey. Council Member Wolff suggested that a flyer be included with the survey that shows the pros and cons. MOTION: Council Member Rochman MOVED to APPROVE the request of the Government Review Task Force that a survey as amended (include minimum costs to add additional Council Members, delete introductory comments on survey questions, and change the word "think"to "feel" in question#3)be sent to the citizens regarding Council membership and that the methods for distribution shall be by water bills and postcards sent to those residents that do not receive the Town's water bills. Additional 07/18/01 Minutes,Council Regular Session 20 information will be added regarding the pros and cons of the issue. Council Member Wolff SECONDED the motion. DISCUSSION: Further discussion followed regarding the cost associated with the request and the timeliness of the survey since the item was to be returned be the Council for consideration by the second Council meeting in August. Jim Kreigh, 40 E. Calle Concordia, Vice Chair of the Government Review Task Force,suggestedissues that the Town's web site be used to explain the and the pros and cons to the residents and keep the information that would be mailed out at a minimum. AMENDMENT TO THE MOTION: Council Member Wolff amended the motion to - remove thep ros and cons argument from the survey and place them and the Task Force's g report regarding the issue on the Town's web site. Council Member Rochman agreed to p g the amendment. MOTION: Motion failed, 2—2 with Mayor Loomis and Vice Mayor LaSala opposed. (No alternate motion made.) TOWN MANAGER'S REPORT Town Manager Chuck Sweet reported that an Emergency Procurement Report will be presented to Council regarding a 16 inch water main break on Lambert Lane as soon final information is received from the contractor. CALL TO AUDIENCE No speakers. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Vice Mayor LaSala MOVED to ADJOURN at 10:50 p.m. Council Member Rochman SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 4 —0. Respectfully submitted, I, Roxana Garrity, Deputy Town CleAc 07/18/01 Minutes, Council Regular Session 21 I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the regular session of the Town of Oro Valley Council of Oro Valley, Arizona held tand on the _18o day of July, 2001. I further certify that the meeting was duly called held and that a quorum was present. Dated this day of ,2001. Kathryn E. Cuvelier,CMC Town Clerk Exhibit "A" , ITEM 7 EXHIBIT "A" RATE DESIGN RS-4 PROPOSED RATE SCHEDULE CURRENT PROPOSED CURRENT PROPOSED CURRENT PROPOSED METER CURRENT PROPOSED COMMODITY COMMODITY COMMODITY COMMODITY COMMODITY COMMODITY SIZE BASE RATE BASE RATE TIER 1 TIER 1 TIER 2 TIER 2 TIER 3 TIER 3 PER 1000 GALS. PER 1000 GALS. PER 1000 GALS. PER 1000 GALS. PER 1000 GALS. PER 1000 GALS. 5/8 x 3/4 11.25 12.00 1.78 1.90 2.08 2.35 2.31 3.00 1 28.13 30.01 1.78 1.90 2.08 2.35 2.31 3.00 1.5 56.25 60.00 1.78 1.90 2.08 2.35 2.31 3.00 2 a 90.00 96.00' 1.78 1.90 2.08 2.35 2.31 3.00 3 180.00 192.00 1.78 1.90 2.08 2.35 2.31 3.00 4 281.25 r 300.00 1.78 1.90 2.08 2.35 2.31 3.00 6 562.50 600.00 1.78 1.90 2.08 2.35 2.31 3.00 8 1125.00 1,200.00 1.78 1.90 2.08 2.35 2.31 3.00 THE CURRENT BASE RATES INCLUDE 1,000 GALLONS METER GALLONS INCLUDED GALLONS INCLUDED GALLONS INCLUDED SIZE TIER 1 TIER 2 TIER 3 CURRENT PROPOSED CURRENT PROPOSED CURRENT PROPOSED 5/8 x 3/4 0 - 8,000 0 - 10,000 8,001- 16,000 i 10,001- 25,000 over 16,000 over 25,000 1 0 - 16,000 0 - 16,000 16,001- 27,000 16,001- 27,000 over 27,000 over 27,000 1.5 0 - 38,000 0 - 38,000 38,001- 64,000 38,001- 64,000 over 64,000 over 64,000 2 0 - 80,000 0 - 80,000 80,001- 134,000 80,001- 134,000 over 134,000 over 134,000 3 0 - 186,000 0 - 186,000 186,001- 311,000 186,001- 311,000 over 311,000 over 311,000 4 0 - 169,000 0 - 169,000 169,001- 283,000 169,001- 283,000 over 283,000 over 283,000 6 0 - 1,800,000 0 - 1,800,000 1,800,001-3,006,000 1,800,001-3,006,000 over 3,006,000 over 3,006,000 8 0 - 1,800,000 0 - 1,800,000 1,800,001-3,006,000 1,800,001-3,006,000 over 3 006,000 over 3 006,000 WHOLESALE CUSTOMERS CURRENT PROPOSED CURRENT PROPOSED CURRENT PROPOSED METER CURRENT PROPOSED COMMODITY COMMODITY COMMODITY COMMODITY COMMODITY COMMODITY SIZE BASE RATE BASE RATE TIER 1 TIER 1 TIER 2 TIER 2 TIER 3 TIER 3 PER 1000 GALS. PER 1000 GALS. PER 1000 GALS. PER 1000 GALS. PER 1000 GALS. PER 1000 GALS. 6 562.50 600.00 1.78 1.90 2.08 2.35 2.31 3.00 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY O UNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: AUGUST 1, 2001 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL FROM: Debbie Moran Development Tech. II SUBJECT: OV12-99-19 SUBSTITUTE ASSURANCE AGREEMENT BETWEEN MONTEREY HOMES CONSTRUCTION INC., AND FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE AS TRUSTEE OF MIRA VISTA LOTS 46 AND 47. SUMMARY: Monterey Homes Construction Inc., has purchased Lots 46 and 47 of Mira Vista, and therefore they request the approval of a Substitute Assurance Agreement. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff has no objections to this request. SUGGESTED MOTION: The Town Council may wish to consider the following motion: move to approve OV 12-99-19 Substitute Assurance Agreement for Monterey Homes Construction Inc., for Mira Vista, lots 46 AND 47. ATTACHMENTS: Substitute Assurance Agreement Pla 41111#ndZo ' Ad 'strator / it `-k Community tvelopment Director 1,7,1,6__ R ---6(:— ......., Town Ma / F:\individ\sag\assur\tecrel • WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: TOWN OF ORO VALLEY ASSURANCE COORDINATOR 11000 N.LA CANADA ORO VALLEY,AZ 85737 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY SUBSTITUTE ASSURANCE AGREEMENT FOR COMPLETION OF SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS BY THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into the day of , 2001, between MONTEREY HOMES CONSTRUCTION, INC., an Arizona limited liability company, as Beneficiary under Trust Nos. 4891 (referred to in this Agreement as "Subdivider"); FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation, as Trustee under Trust Nos. 4891 (referred to in this Agreement as � �� "Trustee"); and the TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, a municipal corporation, (referred to in this Agreement as "Town"), hereby confirm and agree as follows: 1.01 Trustee,pursuant to the land trust agreement described in Exhibit "B" is the owner of a certain parcel of land described in Exhibit "A", which is located in the Town of Oro Valley,Pima County, Arizona. 1.02 The parties to this Agreement wish to establish specific terms, conditions and guidelines for compliance with the provisions of ARS Section 9- 463.01(C)(8) - 463.01 C 8 and Chapter 4, Article 4-9 of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised. II AGREEMENT 1.03. In consideration of the Town approving a final plat for the property described in Exhibit "A", commonly referred to as Subdivision Name Mira Vista, Lots 46 and 47, Oro Valley Case No. OV 12-99-19, the Trustee and Subdivider specifically agree to all those conditions and requirements set forth herein. 2.01. Property Description: The property which is the subject matter of the Agreement is all that property described in Exhibit "A",which is annexed to and made a part of this Agreement. 2.02. Assurances. Pursuant to the requirements of ARS Section 99463.01(C)(8), this Agreement is submitted as an assurance for the completion of subdivision improvements . 4 . s 1 including streets, sewer, water, telephone, gas and electric utilities, drainage and flood control improvements and monuments and property corners as more fully described in Exhibit "C" attached hereto and as required pursuant to applicable Federal, State, County and Town ordinances and regulations. These subdivision improvements are required by the Town of Oro Valley, the improvement standards of the Director of Water, Pima County Wastewater Management Department, the gas and electric utilities and State Statutes and regulations, which requirements are in effect on the date of execution of this Agreement. 2.03. Limitation of Transfer of Title. The Trustee shall not convey title to any of the property described in Exhibit "A" without obtaining prior written approval from the Town in the form of a Release of Assurance signed by the Town Engineer. The Trustee may act in full faith and reliance upon the Release of Assurance. A Release of Assurance shall only be provided to the Trustee by the Town upon satisfactory completion and formal acceptance by the Town of the required improvements. The Trustee's only duty under this Agreement is not to convey without first obtaining a Release of Assurances. 2.04. Contracts for Sale. The limitation on the conveyance of title contained in paragraph 2.03 notwithstanding, the Trustee may enter into contracts for sale of the property described in Exhibit "A",provided such contracts clearly state that the conveyance of title to the property is subject to the limitations contained in this Agreement. The Trustee shall, prior to entering into such contracts for sale, provide the Town with a copy of the form of contract containing the disclosure of limitation on the power to convey. 2.05. Bulk Sales. The limitation on the conveyance of title contained in paragraph 2.03 notwithstanding, the Trustee may sell and convey all of the property described in Exhibit "A" in one transaction to a single purchaser, provided that the purchaser shall, prior to conveyance, have submitted to the Town satisfactory assurances for the completion of the required improvements. 2.06. Conveyance Out of Trust for the Purpose of Encumbrance. The limitation on the conveyance of title contained in paragraph 2.03 notwithstanding, the Trustee may convey all or part of the property described in Exhibit "A" to the Subdivider or Beneficiary of the Trust solely for the purpose of encumbering the property by the recording of mortgages or deeds of trust, provided the property is thereafter immediately reconveyed into the Trust. 2.07. Completion of Improvements. The required improvements shall be completed within two (2) years of the date that the Town Council approved the final plat. This period for completion of improvements may be extended subject to Town Council approval and applicable Town ordinances where Subdivider is prevented from completing the improvements by act of God, strike or similar event or circumstances beyond its control or when such extension is determined to be reasonable and prudent by the Town Council. Any such extension granted shall not exceed one (1) year. 2 2.08. Substitution of Assurances. At any time during the period described above in paragraph 2.07 for the completion of improvements (or, if such time for completion of the g ra P required improvements has been extended by subsequent agreement of the parties, at any p time on or before such extended date for the completion of improvements), Subdivider or Trustee may offer substitute assurances. Such assurances shall be in a form and amount acceptable to the Town and shall be subject to review and approval by the Oro Valley Town Council. 2.09 Inspection and Acceptance of Improvements. The Town may provide for the inspection of the required improvements to insure satisfactory completion. The Town will not accept dedication of the required improvements, nor release, in whole or in part, any pro erty subject to the Agreement until the improvements have been satisfactorily P completed and accepted by the Town Engineer. 2.10. Partial Release of Assurances. The Town may provide the Trustee with a Release of Assurance for a portion of the lots created by the subdivision plat attached as Exhibit "A",p rovided that all of the improvements required in connection with such lots have been satisfactorily completed and accepted by the Town and provided further that such improvements can be used and maintained separately of the improvements required for the entire subdivision plat. For example, temporary cul-de-sacs should be provided for incomplete streets; water, sewer, gas, telephone and electric facilities should be capable of independent operation; and adequate access for public safety vehicles should be provided. 2.11. Failure to Complete Improvements. In the event that Subdivider fails to complete the required improvements within the period in paragraph 2.07 above, the parties agree that the Town may initiate a process to re-plat that portion or portions of the property described in Exhibit "A" for which the improvements have not been satisfactorily completed. The purpose of such plat initiated by the Town will be to return thero erty to approximately the same boundary configurations of record existing before P P recording of the subdivision plat described in Exhibit "A". Prior to initiating any action to re-plat the portion of property for which improvements have not been completed, the Town shall provide the Trustee and Subdivider with thirty (30) days written notice of the Town's intent to re-plat. The notification shall be sent by first class mail, shall be deemed received upon mailing and shall be sent to the following addresses: First American Title Insurance Company Monterey Homes Construction, Inc. 1880 E. River Road, Suite 1209 4742 North Oracle Road, Suite 111 Tucson, Arizona 85718 Tucson, Arizona 85705 Trustee Subdivider 3 ' 1 The Trustee and Subdivider, as record owner and subdivider, respectively, agree that they will execute such plat returning relevant portions of the property to approximately the same boundary configuration of record existing before recording of the plat described in Exhibit "A". The parties hereto have executed this Agreement this day of 2001. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY A municipal corporation MAYOR COUNTERSIGNED: As Town Clerk and not personally APPROVED AS TO FORM this day of , 2001. Dan Dudley, Town Attorney First American Title Insurance DEVELOPER/SUBDIVIDER: Company, a California corporation as Trustee under Trust No. 4907 MONTEREY HOMES and 4891 CONSTRUCTION, INC. an Arizona corporation By By Bri•. te'- .ve 'r R/Grobstein Its: A sistant Vice President ); 1 :`re ident - Tucson Division . 4 • ' r STATE OF ARIZONA) ) ss COUNTY OF PIMA ) This instrument was acknowledged before me this ,qday of- , AL , 2001, by Jeffrey R Grobstein as President - Tucson Division of Montere R,i•mes Construction, Inc., an Arizona corporation. ' ,,e.e ;)i/v / i / / .7 /_,-A ' ' : ill 4 I 0 . ' ,. e A . . I:LI�. ` + , , -�..-....." ................„..,z,„..—....—.,,...... c "E s'"' "OFFICIAL SEAL' _ " Rachel Lynn Turni seed My commission expires (A Notary Public-Arizona ) '4►`? Pima County f'; Yy My Comm Expires 7'2!2004 STATE OF ARIZONA) ) ss COUNTY OF PIMA ) This instrument was acknowledged before me this 079Aday of , 2001, by Brigitte Echave as Assistant Vice President of First American T. e Insurance Company, a California corporation 7'7).....k2,14( -4[ / f 14 / / 7, g I co , . S 7 ,, . nn Turnipseed ill'h-� RaNc�rypublic-ArizonaMy commission expires r ;'A►., ; P;m,a Countyr "y. Ex fires 7�2,2004 , • y,.. My Comm.ComR p t � 5 a • EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lots 46 and 47 of lots 1 through 60 and Common Areas "A" through "F" of Mira Vista according to the plat of records in the Office of the County Recorder of Pima County, Arizona, recorded in Book 54 at Page 2 . 6 EXHIBIT "B" Recording Requested by: FIRST AMERICAN TITLE When Recorded Mail To : First American Title 1880 E . River Road #120 Tucson, Arizona 85718 Attn: Trust Dept . DECLARATION OF TRUST AND AFFIDAVIT FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation, was employed to act in a Trustee capacity under its Trust Nos . 4891 and hereby declares that it has acquired title to various parcels of property in the name of Trust No . and 4891 . The beneficiary (beneficiaries) of said Trust No . 4891 are : NAME ADDRESS Monterey Homes Construction, Inc . 4742 North Oracle Road Suite 111 Tucson, Arizona 85705 � DATED this j�� kda y of , 2001 . F' RST PiA4pr C°AN ITLE INSURANCE COMP ► - - if ornia corporation rigit e Echave, Assistant Vice President 7 STATE OF ARIZONA) ) ss : COUNTY OF PIMA ) 4 j _ , and sworn to me thisdet4ft /,Subscribed day of , 2001 , by Brigitte Echave, Assistant Vice President of FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a California c• poration and that she as such officer, being authorized to do so, executed the foregoing instrument for the purpose therein contained by signing the name of the Corporation as /i Assistant Vice President . l 4 ,4 ' 11141,401 NOTARY P%BLIC EXPIRES : _ . � _. �MY COMMISSION EXcV) _ ` � OFFJCjAL SEAL', Racnel L nn TnSty • pe (VCtcny ub�ic-Ari V ed ti � zona :f4,7,trt,,,7:7,1.445y...", rr'fna Coun�y '�! ,�,�,�`�. My Comm.Expires 7;'2;'2004 r 8 EXHIBIT "C" Subdivision Name : Mira Vista OV Case No. :OV 12-99-19 Trust No. :4891 The following improvements and conditions are made apart of the attached Assurance Agreement: 1. Paving, grading, and drainage improvements included in WLB JOB #199045- A001-0106 2. A public water system satisfactory to the Oro Valley Water Utility. 3. A sanitary water system satisfactory to Pima County Wastewater Management. 4. A telephone distribution system satisfactory to US West Communications. 5. An electric distribution system satisfactory to Tucson Electric Power Company. 6. Fire Hydrants and other fire appurtenances satisfactory to the Golder Ranch Fire Department. 7. A natural gas distribution system satisfactory to Southwest Gas Corporation (if gas is being utilized in the subdivision). 8. Utility trenches and civil appurtenances satisfactory to the using utilities. 9. Installation of all street signs and street striping. 10. The Professional Engineer of Record shall certify, in writing, that all improvements, whether private or public, have been constructed,placed, installed, etc. in substantial conformance with the approved plans for this development. Certifications, in writing, are to be received by the Town Engineer of the Town of Oro Valley and the Oro Valley Water Utility. 9 Exhibit "C" - page 2 11. The Soils Engineer of record or other Registered Professional Civil Engineer with expertise in the areas of soils engineering shall certify, in writing, that all materials utilized on this development are in conformance with the accepted plans and specifications. Certifications, in writing, are to be received by the Town of Oro Valley prior to the request for building permits and/or final inspection and release of assurances. 12. The Soils Engineer of Record or other Registered Professional Civil Engineer with expertise in the area of Soils Engineering shall certify, in writing, that all soils operations for this development were performed in accordance with the recommendations as set forth in the GEOTECHNICAL Engineering and any amendments thereto,by LMT ENGINEERING INC., Job No.99047, dated October 25, 1999. Certification, in writing, is to be received by the Town Engineer of the Town of Oro Valley prior to the request for any building permits and/or final inspection and the release of assurances. 13. As-built drawings shall be provided to the Town of Oro Valley Public Works Department prior to full release of assurances. ADEQ approval of construction shall be provided to the Town of Oro Valley Water Utility prior to any water service being provided. 10 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: August 1,2001 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Robert Conant, Planner II SUBJECT: OV12-00-19 RANCHO VISTOSO PARCEL G FINAL PLAT, FOR 88 SINGLE- FAMILY LOTS LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF DESERT FAIRWAYS DRIVE WITHIN RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 10, PARCEL 219-220-01G BACKGROUND: The Town Council approved the Preliminary Plat on January 17, 2001. There were a number of conditions that were included as part of the approval. All Preliminary Plat conditions have been addressed. The Improvement Plans for this project were approved and signed by the Town Engineer on June 21, 2001. SUMMARY: re representing U. S. Homes, requests approval of a Final Plat for 88 single-family lots. The The WLB Group, p g q pp ~o'J ect site is 30.6 acres and located on the west side of Desert Fairways Drive, in Rancho Vistoso eighborhood 10. OVZCR: The Final Plat complies with the OVZCR Article 10-5 Golf Course Overlay Zone, as modified by the approval of the Preliminary Plat on January 17, 2001 by the Town Council. The Final Plat compiles with the intent and purpose of the OVZCR. Rancho Vistoso PAD Requirements: Thero osed Final Plat is in conformance with the requirements of the Rancho Vistoso PAD. The proposed p p density is in conformance with the permitted density of Medium Density Residential within the PAD, and all structures will be below or at the maximum 30-foot height requirement. General Plan Compliance: The Final Plat for Parcel G is in conformance with the medium density residential land use designation of 2.1 to 5.0 dwelling units per gross acre. As proposed, the plat promotes Goal 1.2 "Promote a compatible mix of land uses throughout the Oro Valley Planning Area", and Policy 4.2A "Encourage the provisions of a variety of housing choices....." .ECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Town Council approve OV12-00-19, Rancho Vistoso Parcel G Final Plat subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit"A". TOWN OF ORO VALLEY )UNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 2 SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to approve OV 12-00-19, Rancho Vistoso Parcel G, Final Plat subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit "A" attached herewith. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Exhibit"A" 1 2. Final Plat Parcel G z--111 Plannin. Zoning Administrator Community Development Director afr Town Manager EXHIBIT "A" CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PARCEL G FINAL PLAT OV12-00-19 1. Driveway location stars shall be added to the Final Plat for lots 8, 19,20, 21, and 22 prior to recordation. 2. A final Drainage Report shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works prior to assurances being released. tc, , vq) r \-c-A ...... .e....„ .,-,._ tt ct._ - C<_ -aaSR_•=3O � �"'�mCz 2DD�D Wr�.��? •z Dmll O���zO 2� •vmf�Om�l�NC'"\�<�m--G2ff��7�m,._,�2NO m.--SSZ-r{1Z'rDrZA o v i Z2a$<� �O�G DZDm�G�VD IvODrrn�Z Zo�mm9 r� O 9 UsZ Zp Atom OZSDr - D� ' { • ti a 3 ^JO t0 OD J T ,,, „,,,9,,,,,9,T r0 M fO!0CT P W N Or'r � C E 00 _ Dcrnri; fiki I— ' 2 n Nt0 � Qrvir'44 2Xm � 4 1 r! N2 f 2 � E El Pm mo 1 ni N� 55N N NUr PN (nD OO A ZIFDPa gr;'' oE Om r m m m Pr :1,1 4pt oNt 2.3 io 0Zrn�D F„,rV1-,, 4 % 2 r�mil, m-4vr omnOpr)- m 0 -� OrmWn rn n Cx7 J m�\ m0m ) ptr2D -1' 1 n. i: • �m --v0D mOampm�- EO m `% .O Oym zvN-20Z' rnF vN 'X aim m4➢ n,2 Wm v mO W nD=m Ipp O pmO2N D On � a2 DAW :4 01 O mp� o� O� i!') c m � M c .zO 011=3G /.Z D W Zm ED mD . OC � `46 - O_-Om� 21zmAr vO r ymcDr. °I- r O Z . NiON '' NS9 Urn nm N O-rpi ZNS O Ozvxm �IZo, P� m'A11' W Dml oW .lW1 IW T6 ':27pn0 O N9iNZv mm O� 2pvEm E,74 ‘e,,, a>r;%:>.6-1 mZcv Fm. Om TI Z v m- rn 0. Wp ZZ) F. P--0. Ti� mmDI ' n0 O rnrnZmgi DNmZ � W 0>�Ojyg mg O mN O ODryAv D ..P F'. C; OW _ 0Z �v r 0 EDm Lar9 (13;41S n0IN rvS � WOmD Sv mr v DmZ' .{N imW M I O4 o mW rn 2 'A IW ?NrD mOS 0rnm0�O 0vO _ - f8EN f+ W v W� T 7 1 m m� nZ D* . n r -< I , r~nzcm >SOfpZokT D rXE26WI 8 2 O"pO 0 0 m Aom Xo = n : A mnn vr O{m O41p ZPin vp.0��� v vOma -C< m � m2m Om ng1-'1a y $- mv '7:41 D m OD_ m- 2 m PX hrggm11 Z v 2:2Z '0m `1,10 r ii-3 ; � miiii•o sZr �v r NmDC T. ' 2r W�Smm 74mcmvLn Z N mvD§ 0N o mW n Z m mNA m DD 0m Mvn NFtr” Mh:iti ^-71 A P- Zo 4, 9,)u.)AD 0cv mph"�O bS; t 5 • • I g 9 1 l'a vg3 Za v -mvOSm N. 0 (FOS-Al v nt vm � Z1 i 'm- 0C r!,, mO nvm, iWoDbgr%1 � N' Z �Dmpi � r§ COW°m n r'-''' rMv z, v :14 Wl 151 rDzDWrii � un ;" �: WNo rn !a:7-4 D7mn !'ii OOga g AN -: r CEM Z Z %X Axvn O 00D I O)mO m vvC 0OD mON %?-"Crr-2 O W WDN �Dm vr fDmnrrW �D'iN m ti"�'CnEr Cm ~OZ11 vW p O n) O�� m mmOO m O i,--'ria D % �zRg aDN v gDO� O N�Fv Ti O ea O Z ymAogOwginm z IDNm •2� v . C mrrA 'noNc GonZvr �n1A zZ D _OO O .t0pI .O (9zOgn.0oa PIil �1 Nm 2;0 0rn (.,H' W m�p mo Z a O gq O na G)mNm gn m7O i ZOZmV 'PI mNNmm D m1mm � n OxNf-o7 r 9 tzuz _ N O O fig , mt-I, rO mZ " A ”� m�o VD N,c )n Dnc5)- WNZ1,I t O zp Z 2 N W Wn � qSh9 Ar''''t m- Z m v p _T" te? DN O Di Zm pn,C ' '81-.§i17), < D 2 VCm�2nm< z�7 0� 2a mrpprn(n mZ -, Ov �� n� .m A -m . ��� n m Wm o m< > aQC v2710z �m ? mo F n O Z m Fmtv_r Sr�3 W ZIN1'4 4Om p gif" il b' 11 -92 :Ii;i1X. ' 91 zra m S Z �Q �p mN o .,wc o N C � O ' nC�. zEm gA mNWmf � � N �bOem z OZD < omZ �0 D -13-.N 1-1.37<% DDn1� 5 � y A �my � o a pOr 4mNOOOg2vrE') ? m O p z p � coiff. Z ro Z '�"-cmO Dmopnnm�0W TO' � N m N �vgma -)W-CO!OA vlom p0nA OO m 2 CZOm � ON nDi g i § A vP O. ny mm. � A ejimvpp�4 Z mxai g LI D Do. y �`� —Wn mnAm X mCv DD xOWmm Zz9l D D9 9 ZO,r 1 mm ��/ DO NDD cN 29#8D M 0o�q1 ' ZmOD "��Cn�_eerMZ1, 02),.. Z,»!Rg:. g Wvv� ;INv o � s. • D Om 1S rSv r=4vz2 i vm vScz m�m NrD I r-<mgvvD� .o> mN rn o El 4 7 yOZ2m-�P 1V.�. fCT7l►-srr �N:\18c:50 50\NEI _. ~4X91431 � Oz00 UrfAirg: iiho �,,O cO�ZOD N "N; *fagP',... ,.'.,•�..;' . nviaii�- rii, �M ' m ZO�.gvma av � vp<m,p,� ti nOp 'z maZ � oZSm62ng O� w• L< mO � opmD�0DDc>.a9z O1=v11DmIN J Ni- gl _ C ZnNir A ro ; Z'^ m"mF8VZ ; MVNN1O rn o (-Ar' -« �4nmpO DN 'r ? Jomw PT°"" irn `O PAL � OWm� l 4;2'74 , % l'''-j -%- Rb Da�om�my� -9 lb ? v� r toiqn N4t , IFA, lisi'it; m01b <.,50 ? prD> N zOg D� " : l lir �m'i� 0 Z2 pxDm . 96 OFm-' xnmprnv@ - 12 1 CO &' c`l •-8-O vv Apzxy rc'"� o-ioWD Z �Z- rON r02 ', m OKZNo � � cnAy Zi- id a R �'P - (Y I� � �\ 4/1� 4[. t,, Ij�otTl rC.. m� O pm � ps r Om �-O N ..y. vO no 0 - glIrAOWp %�aT)� ZQ 1111111% .:'.JO � )y m p) WZ D.D W�m � o7omv mDD ND 4111101RZ,?S o :c �y� O r�g pN �..zmHW Anr�ODrr m 5 NE1))Z ;p 1 � ,7;: / so i- 0 �A pgr9 xSipy WW9C �n mO pZ ::114A� %%• , pr`���-11P 0i naC ^C�� " O :4,11:081 J �OO Z P.'lCO �_C cvRMe' I�l5 � T ni9QW Zgr: 1471 N !olitiHrli gilt: m $G �� �Om -I'M to '10=.20Y)0 O9WZN �rnmMoo� O � Q O � � m 9055 R1;929.9, AyO0n O % ogl> O A � pONrn F6;1442� mo 0m,453o81 G) r r 2O ZZm o zN0D1002-01O Z o= r>"-, '' zDr >o90 9 fr0 GHO\ARC\INL PLA\FP0G-0fl0 !,2,;.. im ZrvD Jrj Zmo zZ i',J n-9 O� N:\185050\NEIGH10\PARC\FINAL PLAT\FP10G-02.Owg Fri Jun 29 13:34:23 2001 P IP / r ——1 c, ti 1 i.a r lip '1..1 d mei S'.3 I Lj r :. n —�'p�i Y No7roo'oo• 8 0 o S• t.i D I -5g 165.85'E �o g„3�!I Cr r:il '- _ f t,t'i -t 1- prA :,�=�J� Of NN i s „i T� '--3 I ca, g o s g SI =.,-, I ,.. > > •c• w i► 0)t 1 �i'rnq p s ‘,4.,1011I - NO2'48'30'E a !ill; �" ' r.' N Ao \ 241.88 artA, - ?2Oso 4O L*9 ,s '. I AIIN ggiiill. F , 10-tng Irf°` itar / 1 o 's. ...; 4,,A,:-..!rjal 41k,04-0, , %_.!illitil,- .,"\, ,,,,,11, *p 0 y 1 NIF--taz . t_, , , .,, , 0.00. ________ imitui, ,, , ,\\,./ i ;/'I7,. S09 00'00`W 190. , ''. i \' ''.i- -44111,4 Ait,--- A �•'•�1 ��] O r �, , ,`�,- 98 td 1 O � - 1 V-L .,k ,-/-_,......,.._._ 1 t , -',-'___ ~ �i � Ca I 0 1! \� `Il\� _.1_L`�' � `•�,Ott 004, ,,. `,�y .4 1 l'iAl ,,.,\2\7\12.i<\.:,1,1:1111:-.1;1 1; i ? i c ; zl�,• 11 i,,`` ���a, ,�,1 •�,�yi SSS 1 L--- - __i '7 J� t I i 1.__I -f I =,-+N�tr�1 kiogir r _1 iJ. 1. S?tiblr. 4440iibiSor0 04Ll). 1 1 % I <> $. ,;� No2:a2-s-�{tv _ • -_` I P 'ti. I 1 [2 e 1 I Z. �` I /,!/ S1groO,o0. t► ooaL1S %' ;`�-.. 639.8', 1 , �o�� s, -., y -- Ir I r;r', v, o j536 .-)7 m , ,i n 1 w I m 66.806 rn W L J - - --,._ 1,139,00,0_0_§____,\,_ 33 LO'Ob9Z 3„SS,00.005 N N �.N ,l6'8C9Z -- 3„l 1,Z0.00S r � cn l•A IN I T�• ig:ii*b 7.+O k2) '''r( T+ ��T V, Em c cn r v z . �T. ZWim Ul ii N'81---TIp O t..). T. D � � z v ry x —\ - m-I o ' cn D az 4 ' c) v m n t� Uj Its -8 o `('y r I I. ! `i r / �j D 7, z ^ r . r. .n-. n n D. (7. 02 �• tmcz, O I I 1 ( I 1 ® ® ` . m ?Ti- v I 3 X v 1/ 2 ) > ' to r.,9 `� '� I I m� � I I I'0n ....:i ,-1 S ! i:; 0 n` OvbCpo vcn�r n rnxQ cm w 0,', o :_ci. p Z v v Z v v Zv, COt, N. kf, -'(12 ER i oOm Dmv mD m pxXO -4m - - OO-i O-i , ,DO ,,D,1y W j� �1 y- mO p 2 2 A v 2 C ,. 33 4 AZO2 gool 2V1 � . . D m� Z m o � m zty Dm z r � � � � m p4 (i)m W CO � � Z ' r -1 r m -iD Mfz m m D ScO r C NC ...0V ipZ „,z r- '- cm �-va,4 s e i m' rm m i o z m° E z Am mDn Ov m m ' A Z mz NO N1^ m ^ c-1<' mr- IZziC g m'•1 Ry b o z 2W P { Zi13 mp 0 • V Z —1z 11 OD rn z ni _ z (' 8 " mrnO itN N r O 2 m 1 0 O(o N:\185050\NEIGH10\PARC\FINAL PLAT\FP10G-02.OWG 2-01 I N:\185050\NEIGNIO\PARG\FINAL PLAT\FP10G-03.Owp Fri Jun 29 13:32:07 2001 P W s Q3 :1 u�. 3 Jl gc�y 3� (�j pN zs.9; �tpOp 1!I V: o c ''' An /\ ., t-1 ,/ N D `t, p 0 ` y , s°0' e04 o * :0. . 6900c�S�' D 0, �' d , oo ' om ''''.'7.-- o: 's $ S ri yp •00.: A( D--•f / 3,.80 4'' c, •' o�1 ASO r+�/ \ r!,�• �)S moi+ g CO O' o a' � � A /4„ 'S).00, 6• 0 V I. - S)° (p 4 ,§ g 01 �S ...,.). .>,00,,_._r n>. ,CO ....47..._ 4s4 ti 0 ,. f� , FF .1 o.'°• 4�/ �y o S00• 6966. \, co./, ---,, \. S* § 9g , p� o : \ \ 0,, x ; (off t�� ' c l I1. ,{+� '�. �` OOG' J � \,S°°• � �� /� OOH• N �� `t.ki, '`Aja\ U Ol J� O 230, D ,yam P \ 6 4.1 ,S°°• A ^�462 /��`''''cf 1 3O,. ' 9 c'• �, °i S)°S� \ \ °' �� gyp, g F ,+ -. \ v a s `y,S S E,.. S . , O c ° �O• °o �r�D �8 (j meq. �*t C�� .,/-i*1 -NI, , �`�, Ul / ,oi�'' \ 1O 9 I-n F8% g23 .>,,o0. ^'' v c3 1 S00'18'04"W �� n �. a 8��tiN Old C83 u, 2$7 a GO ,s 50.00' i.'163- v P 22 �M�95. `d • • 44„ �,'A.l .cog'cy2 6°g'F ,S LZ'a S 4,,,, 0 o ss G°j�+s• >>3.00• ?,4,L,g"C •2g•. 4.$ 9• F 5i— .za l• ~ �� r� a da 13 . w?•• P J.. ...4d ... RA6 Sd2! ' �\• u + n z 4. g0'�15' La 76 ga. P.....,>.......,...,„1-c;,,,-''lig r4 -1 P^' .• 1 i 41:1,"�`► C18 a T. 13 ti j • o`d . 1 NN t >NN....2 ._- ,, .....0, ��nl .�F'�'' L' e D '' _1 `d� 4�J i► ��_ S baa RA12 l 00`00" a�iz�� a Z .-.�.� Sia £�d� 3« '-',/`� '9121 �4 • va / I_\� •.Vita RA 19 mr 'OA 7 ..•at `db R22 .r 61 D LLV2I - 13l 639.8. Rig._Wig•—. • •iib Ogg z iii6g° � A z N D O z ,y v t�2�t D it % 0 ',A.N ti y O 0 0 O m O�`b0 0 i R ,Z It lico , to 0 8 k°' o h fi 0 1" it Sit OV klCI0� i Zr ..l, •0 0 Co O 1:..► a t w ;b.Co ki O o=' p ft b .10v TX O 0 P,•. W b 1 O o '•1 I O 00 m N:\185050\NEIGH10\PARC\FINAL PLAT\FP10G-03.DWG 2-01 J (I"t"\'185050\t$1GH10\PARD\FINAL PLAT\FP10G-04.Org NI Jun 29 15 35 12 2001 I p :94 9,?• N07 00'00" ��ti1.4 )-5 E 165.85' P^ /F i 45.85' .�� Np V�Nt�41-�� // rn • yl ti il la1y'aO �S ' // u + 1 •1, O / z oo u ;41§1i ti� c.l. „N) ti• o T` _,i Sao `�*° a *� J Q0�'' -p 3 R-7 t» 0 ��� !SS o, a t Otic e ',?� '' �, o vv`�a. C `� C45�.�a � N r�r�� to m pV, � vl al ANN llOSa' // �l M•p5 5�• cA �`N 0 ,/ Q / N gal �,�� , S. ,,Cf �i 71�� O� S/ / .mo v, R. , _„. 58 tIct , h_. tLe..%, .. s_s,0 \ LQ\j �\ A� ca4'� S 7)/'3O3 F a. S' 1W�►.c` 3 ?�0 O C.34';'')7. 57-0.t'- n1111.:..1-0` 6,7- 1' • . i ' Ij a N• 36' S''.1., '1r��a m 0 O \ c0. Q�� l� I 'F„:2?...,..,2 �' �1 It t. O !,�. _. N ��� 'sia. SiS. o O / 80.00' ,. 4i'18`W o_ o a N». 8386 C v ^t W v 8p 0'19 f - . 166 F ^ .r... o u v m 8 4153j, `''''\�O 2�9Zj"�m1' ZZ� V \\ • 1 c15 a'� ab 0 00' '',....•��1, to \ 59 c o=' m V1 653 .. • O• '����Cm x oil 11X68' o 7.: ► m�� 8p00, '0 oN� u3 sC) 61„ a 03 c„ 158. ' '•`-r r `80 .00' /�A• '7E4. N /i '4S� - L.QT 4 ,i'” '''+ �` r ` �N��fyG' 68'l N0721'59"E 0� o �`'/s '•�Nj tn rw -` (po gam'\E' N �i i-38.15' ,6 ,8'' .'`i �,.: 41 10 s ,37- fr _ "'1 REE-7., b �J 4, 0 �A 5 6\S . ,a N 3 55•-°' 0 0 >dt' S, 13 ♦ a cG t \---:=' ;'0 0• $ n m ,c,9 i N_ 'ti,�,�\• N vii` Sc,+ • . ti� g W o , rn• \\p,,,, .6.1,,..'66S 5 1�6\S o co �p a c rn * N 50 0 �s 3+ . a+ S 99 gal/fit r 6 vt . ��• 't,,. c \9�/$\ �'�0 0 Wo ZOO \r"0,,`'�. �"�Y�, 1133,8.9\\ y r .c. Nol; '�SSz N —Rs,' /\N d'1,4 1JY ��4111111i ' moo,, co �- tig' a M.�SC`ra1,yS o`� s.60\ s� V � / Q IA _ �, \ \S r ifs, ti *4)1. g1,A1';' N ra l1g _'50.\ _ S b -3.55.1-'6 �c. \'� \,N c,`, °��Q\'.8\'�� YY. - VZ °°a�j3i D cs Z �o,'°� QQ /, \\\ fn C\ LI vi0_ N 4 \ Of r 0 r. + , .49'3- / \\ �� 2\\ O N co oto b \ ✓ �c g9 0.6\S O. ili \ Na a \ N N�' \\ o o n, Ir . �\ b2.so,, f'` , o ;3 p w, v T F/ \ \ 0 •p O / \ N N \\ (1'7(.2,"8 O CA ,() �,G12. ,., \\ '6 �� 6Q;,61,5 <1 [1 tC70 C AJ Qy' "0 f= 4 \ Y 0 J A �� Y .u.\°°‘. \ � A 4,..\\.44, . 4'307e6:5 ,,a 11 1.`.- .-i \\ Do / ,fl \4• QyI• ;J : % ,\\ i1 , N _ \ \/l 0coa c `� gh g k c') `'d>÷''''e) 4.,;\ t6 ' 011.0t4 .2 \\ .,,,,N,„, FA • -ott O O rc,'p'� 6''fl\\ •-00�� vet k0 �J�1,,3<• j/ \\`' ,` • • 0 o Z '� 0 N Gj.�O S�\ . mmmmiDDco / 5 s ,;. \ c,\, \ toy O t`9 r \ v �� ,/ \ _\ N p-+ t2....6=',..,O r/,o \ —\�rnmm / / �/ y \\ to 69 ► .T x 2y s ' �.:4 GQ.\\ j� Y ' 00. 4�� V al A w 'Os►CO :. F, cPs\ ^7.4 / ::;, I 1 t� N30 A N., ?;� ,\?::?. "p \�- \-\c.,,,, ,,#'3, �\ / f\A / ,,,,_0,,,,,, m b ` ,� 1O5° .6,�� �,�N oss b m o SEE SHEET 5 m V 4,N i O o "i 1 O CO co N:\185050\NEIGHIO\PARG\FINAL PLATVP10G-04.0W0 2-01 I N,\th5050.1.19V.i,I.,Pli,,P10.05.in It,Jun 29.95:96 2001 P P. . SEE SHEET 4 1 cnthl ... cQ,... .4.-,, -... 0) ., * /\‘\ \ \ \ ier,4 -0,. .. !,-.'• 0 C, .4 ,.....'-) \ ) .........-.. li, h., --...., '"' 101 .:- -.0•6‘. \Vo \ . trk Z ! 0 1 coc0 ',.. ,s ,' ' '''..0 ',... / z 3•• \i'0%.'" \ , 4,..7•?, •00, ''''.> / \ c,0\2 St,' * r''''"';' \\$I.'c'•%. \ ..tt, ,N ,\___./ *S..„' /'s•\c't ,-c-,, Fi CO- .230- \%\ N <5' 's,. ,,,,s')„,c,?' 4,-/%`' - i111\ \ tn, i ‘-`),:e,,... -p")z'' \A •,' t. \ ..1--• ,,'?,p,,,/5., \\ \ . pc,ss,,s 'it ,..ss.1-°'6 ., \ ,t \ 'IVO' 4....-10 °O -b ‘:' .`t,.'-'. 9. '-') 4. ., `07 07_., ,,:, , ,4‘-‘r.%. 20 \-)0 1".:\-P \ Il.00 -.. r..) ct -,.. , ,ct.3Q5..„. 64 op skt\ 0' °O.\ \ * 11 ;3.7'3 .60.‘6 c ,ss.:,,Q.0.. c' te,vo•\''+ c.6c., -,s co..\ ' ,,1 •:\'''''\::' 2 ^,03 . ,,,,t', 2 .' `.; ‘ '•,,..00, tn a: ci, co ii'L"44c' oc;d4 01 Sz' 60 SP,,,t7 r'\ ,' v.5.'\,%,•,, '' 'V <is ' 1 •,P.l. \Z -.....,• •••,... , 51',( ))" -,0\ ri * - • -,0\ •\ , ,,---vi 2,03 To., :.\ .,c) tg. , ,, ,'7. L, • N>, •oa, , . , • ,..„ •',.. \ -,„2-gu, ., ,., i., ,5,„, , \a, „,.1; ,. • . . -• • - s — r. * ,,, ,,,. 73 4) 0), ce,,\ 0 P , c p si.,'. , i .. ‘• To \ \' ,ki h \.6, / ; •oc,. e II •5. 1 ,,, , C/2 ,..,0„. ;:,. h3 A. ( c' , • \ ‘C, 3o,, ? 0:b-;c.ss' El 2 2''' C.:: 17,8°1.* e ?), ' E°8 6‘,PS' 'cii Sic. '', 7 60'°,-- i9''' t6,0' :,-", e:,,,, to, •00- e l2 ,,, K., ' , , .., \ r?, legr-`:'6 c c 9 '''. / '?q,,,,, ..c".), 0,...4 cs,../.:9,4 / 4) ii,, e 4, , ci, / 'SPA it .., > •c— '6' 'SA t; 'c . ' P , .., / ! ., si4 At \ \ •,. .,- ,0 , ,./ '''' —1 4,?, /(1 23 v '. / N , ....--- ..- . - •__......---------- \ g \\7. ii,tl, 140.46' W-'1 Cf) clfl \ AcSmo / Z t.1 14 -:, 1 , ------- -. :::---,_X,A 61.1:1 „e•4'2 7; se 6. .2 1 c.,-<o':4-4:1T. c83 ,, — bx I, ' I .... :7-14:-3; c I-: l'•41.II.•I Nil... c.F1'211 2:5: :11s3\11-:7!IC:FaIN_4.2'.:1'....':.1-.'1.'11: :" ;.:...'...5:.:.:''.. 7 .•• '• ./8. r. Z>7.• , Ns' -co 4204., ..,t,Ne/ , ,--- ; • - °-,, 1,1 ' .avl••,?o •, _ si,..72,271, i N. ; ‘ , • ., '•. , .__.,,. 739.99. ,_ ... 348.- ' \ . , •' ---......... i • \\lc.. 1,, , '• .• , '9t/) 108.87. , i ,, sisy) . . t ;;'„, / -- 0 oo 53. I 44.0 . /004 i l -.1 ') -1i.4.-6,,,i-$) . / N . c-) , i 2 _, I_--.L_ I 0 , _ _ ..____ _ i __ t't -x •-, , 639•Si. ----, :,.. --. 88' LI --,., c' ) , 1*-: 23 • N....• „, En ur• ,--•4 0 §r,` 2— r3,8 ___------------- to 0 r---- 0 ,i -z. ig44gilc' I / , •• ,q .1..., '..„ / .---..\.. .10 ?) t c, .... q6 ' I?)'..1.' F., 0 ,•, 0 \ / ."13 IN ni :t \ 0 .... . x o ni pi rl. -1S CA 7 c,2, -7, NA185050VIEIGH10\PARGVINAL PLATVP10G-05.DWG 2-01 ___I • N\185050\NEIGH10,.G\FINAL PLAT\FP10,...dwg Fri Jun 29 13,36,01 2001 F p / .•. i i i % C� T. n i $3� -11 v... Pg'gO It) vl ..$pli 4jO �, - 1 r �0.�4' \`� s�Ass 9 '1,'",i,'1,'",i, '' r ` � 9 ,\ ,‘,.., O1. •SR' ,,, II/ .,),,,.,4,0,,,,,,9$4, ,e-g, Os's' .to,c,„ ..,,,,,, ,C,,, AM°1*'\ . I& P cit cP. .>'`'c O cP t' .' 'Ps� 4,r Opc'L F. C8 is Si >>t1` //• N N2j �r"� c�` ° o�� ���•' STV °° F .- 0 str. 6 z. •O co 11 11 c" 0 �� 2 O 1- o s v Y p ?�3oS• o•ai,j,n .� !!`ss p O /O�' .-,tet \ m'. x , •6)• ��O• �•gq // OO ja /`, / \t\ \ j� Op v \ • Ci 9 y c V , , \a0.4S'1 \ /C53\ Q lti0 '�a. ?O v /''' ''ys 6c.`"" C'' 0°U 9‘; \\` Ql�,iB� c1\\9 o a•,t c\// L / 114 ,0o VO- mDN `-.2 Oj9°•\ : - -4 v a CO O°9' /' A iQ L-7 * 261 v \� 08. cn�� �-, N P iia ss •. Cil \ i. u, O[P �\ ' / . L4 '°As to _��_ O - co a 1 ( • • a \.86 Sc'V.' gro 6� �, c CV °' IC ''j''" �K 10 I Rjfl��� P. L • 1f• s� $6O N 6 p / '2s � sD. c.\ u•0 8 50• iti ,C3: , `,./D r 9 lJ 8 S'4. v 4."1 � ——6£O- tNn• to `�C i*1 D C� iq c'�,,\� 165' �� ,. r q,\ „90.00.8 6S I( 0, m S?4 0' C.,�. r:' \C at,s>>e' .\ t,6�'1 rng,1 8).10.* B _ oe ?3, 101 Sc•'° CO rn .t w g3• •/IN Ciss v 81 a; F Z �,�, ''?'ca OF' v ,, ,�20 5gF \S31 48<b" w �O • m w *. sc, c C2-3,.., •0 O. . ^w 1 No w 4' rn e-• d-� 4.-;,--&.5•5•03. \CS a O h7 tv , - j,sic 0 s trt.e.p.„., 4 ill • ti`'�, 24 !I - s8 10 're,.`o, q,/ ' '/ - 16 '\ f�� _ 113.80 p/ / Z �� R.) `' 1040 lir II, _---;---_21825 52.66' Ii lv: A !"o * \C1 Ga19gg 00• \\o i `509100 00"W1s0.sa; .n._ -_ 1F c3I/ i-. r 02 �' °?4\• 0 190.98' -ZL22 ''' / �,,�; ' ' ._/.‘ ,is.:___-__ + 718-.(C . to 0 •��id. '8. ' �w py J op m -710 \ t,\ ��� \C 1 0113 .' 6,c,' 'y48*'c.i \ r $AP b � O 0 v A>a 5 \'. i ii �, I 1 -� s70410 .. � `Q/ ' '09 O`4a.. F.. t 1 i I • _�\ B 1 fly `� �• ij 1 it I t �� c'it/ 9-��S �@�', T �r to i._. ti N. (l sib. , \\ A 2 �._._• :tom ;y t \. 'I'p \ _.._ % `\ \ 5,.q 1---- _ Cr ' • •_ it Z:4 ''�i ? I.' \\ /�` .mss'`\\ \2 I ----7—r-----1.4 _ r+1 I,.,y C i i m~ Ii I 0 \ ,� \. o QUI I ( , \ e'• \ to u �Oh ? ' 1 1 / \ 0 \ - to s� —I__ _ j i I i �, --; \ \ ti ' i iti �C _ �I 1 t 1 \ I, � \ F., o3 O i i 1 \ I, Fes, 1 ,/ 0 0•"1 O ` . I I m aIt b !!i , 1q "`_ I I rn_ ni m-i Co 1 Oo '*1 1 0 W M 7 N:\185050\NEIGH10\PARG\FINAL PLAT\FP10G-08.DWG 2-01 J N:\185050\NEIGHIO\PARC\FINAL PLo,piOG-07 dwg Fri Jun 29 13.36:35 2001 P lia / 11 l { r. cs i \ 1 ,101 Uo°l ° I Y,12 5i i� 1 il f� Fi.° [ F Yii '1 n \ U O; L Q 4 7( AN ,-,, P,,,,'63 -_,....................... Illi t.r.,,O()No 6:: E NIADDTM1O8W' WY yW 221;710;-' � T ,.... o- QpC \*.\ \ `\\ Cp. • ,m.� "r' 01 I \\ �oE. C.4,4.-2)\ � O�b \ N.� s'O pY \\\":\ �5� SJ,SAsN0246'30" 248ys \� � , em. \ p,%4 � ( \\�J ;�,4c5/ P�s128.5o n o <mm n �o5 op,-,:;t1 WAMN.4 EG�IMANTURTNYCING m b �113.32' 76.96' 1913 sG,f.N1256'49„E 827? m 114,23. 2j.\ 00°,,OS' S rQ, 4. \ z 'o "w uv Z _ �400F o \ > > . O \ a A �- C rn i.W n w 288 !C� ` \ ^' -Ocr`C29. c./,-,P ..'\ \AI' 2 �' 2 ,ss. 8,41.2. S \ _ C3__ �N 4''''')4 049 L4CO' ',..i) .00\-\\ /' ti `C32` � �cc Uv ,-.A 6' GF � \ 44.51' N00'OO OQ„W C3j 2V1^ 98---4467 Bro, F \\50519'27"E f�A, � \\\? \tiL Zi-6.7.-....,c,,9, ,. SD;',, 4'35 ' ., \ �^ rno vG > � C cz3 47• c `' (o��v(o0 \�C'sF S6'O,\\ o4,�w'� cp, 99j C9 y019 7 • 6 \\� _ o`er�a� \ d<7 23G °0 \C36 // c , O 0 8S8\ 3: „90,p0.gb`1 i•.. OOa N m D o o�� �.�i _ 49'LS A I �` �\ oo c)" m vJ '6 Cls 00'181.21 \,� 020 "4 : NI m �� C�4'6 Cl 2_ 1\0 1u) a� _°tel'+\\_ t m 4 j�I'i'�I��1� / / , a ti� 0N 7co \�` J a v -ti O `. C7 6 ` rri ! •// / / i -- __ / , / / / / / - /S 'ci? 'LI / / --------6 i rs' '....„.../...... / i ; i 7i1 I / !� it - f IIII Ii. 31 .., , _...... ---- , -;.3,. ,-----, .....„...___ / / -t)-.. , b ,,,-,,, - R t' trip 020 f i. �I :/ `�'-....' / I t ../ L'J 4 1 1 1 / o I i o `Z” k' N r' ! i' ! �\ '"\\.\ `, O 11 / .., / \_.,/ \ , \ -- / \ tt, \\ o �. a Q i !t, % '� . :' / ti , \ \ i m >.!ki; b b Irn o O ' til 1T1 o -4 6 v^1 I O o -,1 0, co-4-‘, N:\185050\NEIGH10\PARG\FINAL PLAT\FP1OG-07.DWG 2-01 W 2D0 it' n n��n n nn n n o n n n n n n n n n rn Ell n��c�n e K71,1`2'. c->(c'n n n n n nn n n n n n n n n n n n n�n n�n�n�n�P.12 �N n e n(2.=2.4 n n�?(��n n n n n n n�n � U U J J J J J V V J V V m 01 O O7 01 U 01 O 01 O)U U U U U U U U U U A A A-p.A A A A A A W w W W w W W W W w N N N N N N N N N w N-' 2 U J 01 U(4>W N , E.,c0 U J 01 D A W N-�O t0 OD J O1 U�w N....O l0 07 J Qi U�W N O c0 0 V 61 U A W N O c0 OD m U J+W N O cD OD V m U?W N.�O cp N V Q7 U A �O m i .. „ , U U N U U U j N N j w J N N N J J,„ N U V l 01.01 O1 N N U OD U U OD l J U,Vp,U W A p N OD N N N. N D O U O O U O O O D U O O U U U N O O O N N U U p U N U p U N U U U U U p U1 V J r„n U U t0 cD cD c0 O O D U U p U O O D U U A O O U O U O O O O O U O U 0i p U p U U O n y O O U O O D U 0 0 rn p rn O O U p O m rn N rn 01 0 0 0 0 0 0. p U U rn rn O O O O m 01 0 0 0 O O,Q O O rn O 01 p O _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 p 0 0 0 p O O p p p 4 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 2.p p 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 O 4 Q p p O p O p O p O.p. 4 0 0 8 8 0 O p O V1,„ r'I O O O p O O p p O O p 0 0 0 O Q Q p 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O -i DO00 NfOJ WJ N•?WW N bO�i UW QU1+j?Uw("I n OOp NO UU.p_NcmcwD0 UwP UVU({.'+N0D1;v WUN�NN C + 0n N UWU OWO A 2NT0DNN ASpOW U1m UJ V7Oi UUOr7 :iiN-T.J - UJ UUUO-P2. N0gUV swQ1 D .2N.G AANp WApW jO OOJ Hair E f N gS$ VWwOO� U-- W O.O—O0000 W ..VUAipW ?00000— N . OtWO OoOpapOO-ODNOO N-00-O iF° J�0�C? W0OpcD WNWO�� A 1U Orn - " O NOA NUAA4 NO 4� r asi'o0 - V W0- Oc, OOA QUWOc0W 0 OV OODOc0Dc0c,cO0WNW, Np NOD ;u � 01 ._O- WaU01O_O_ UN A-- o c0 NU OJ 01 -- O_AWp-ON,O?OtD,v' c0sWwO1N N U °i o;Y v ,.N ,/ N N N N N CO DCIn n O n n h aOWNg n W bN E P N O Y N 07 U U U N U J 01 01 O O p 0 "'N A N O O 01 N N O D U U U N Ol O1 N U U U U U y 1111._ 0 0 0. Q N U cp p p 01 m OO 2 p p n)p U 0 O D U U p 0 0 0 N U U U p O O O p O O p p00,88.8.8.8.888.8.888.8088888.8C°8888888....8 O O O ''U W N U W�01 W W �W N ,„N t0 W ,N J A",(. cp N Q A (.J (D A O) m W O N N J cD W O J A ,3., ...� O 01 V W V tOD("I c,O7 W A(UT U,t W O W N J OD O 4 N g,P N p v m rn OD OD V Q7 OIV O7 N h N O J A A O f O (n � Ooow "cn o-,coWw-� � O 01 N w J(O_N W O W O O m N (O c0 t V O-'OOD V W QD N N N cD N N p0 N Q O O U V w O O N v g V J�"� O(,a O U!U! r W W O W O O?W A O rn rn Co W v Ui 8 N O cD-t.-- r 00 pp�j Q O W W w 8 WO 2(l�01 U w ;='U(Op W O O(O O O 01 U i °01 :O]N U OD 01 N 01 _ _ N,'' `�7 n¢ n h7 ig SNA A U!AD A!N!!AV�D01 ADU�➢?�DW ADN zDl 2 ;i ,y E UA E N E m N➢ lZ1 C.+ DrnW wN AW�p . OD- r Z 4- On citr32ornpo 'cUe,;g rnmm m N 01 N U 01 V7 U Z rn c0 t0 O o1 O O O-i N N N A U W. U cD N.CO U U,1-,. g J N O N= ,,,,r,;42 Z O7 2 LP N O J 0 0 1r m '4=.9,F,( NIJ NUv(�,li M—NtUA0'VO(WNTI VWWWN0I7 U UO1 NW wrgV N4?NID N.p yANwn?A�!NZ—Vw°•'ON°° tiy 1Na cgJn7 cn1 zz DO mN nN—NZ ( ZNO Z; cZm US �J 6Upm y ApUi AU O-A A m �•y t:. A?WcN4W AU o L..O ,4 g(,NOA U h mrmmmm mm rl , �p mmim a 31)T\ ,•i:iii 6 ,Zl�7.Zl Z7�1:CI A.�T/Tl�1 Zl,T7;p Zl �7 �l�7 A W N N p l0 U J O U A W n O T,OD J 01 U 4 W N rn w rW r W rNJ rN01 rNU rNA r,r rNO m rJr��rtD rOD r r1 rD rA rW rN jr mrrZ, � y U(7 p0pt0nrnA.pUNfzr � 1,0 ig T,N O1 WU c00 pW NOD U t.?U,e po m A WNU 01NWO WN 8UN 0 r m ,] 88W'07U 000UAp0ODADUOOWDOA IZWZO I� WN4N O QU4W Z„G my AY O6 W OU y NN U U ZJONU 1C~, A U?U 01 0 PN -tWNDz O OONO oO_D_ U OOoA riti*i *mrrirrima O --p-�A O A U O N O U A O Q O N N U��-'W O O W O A O Z 01:3 W A U 01 J?01 c0 A- A U U c0 c0(D c0 p p W U N 0 0 V1 g; Rig g ri ri ri ri rim ri ri, r*i*i Ri Ri rri r*i m r i ri g a(- � n, n ob n II Z2 c) 0oz �N O to O o,, b c" o ,• �rj3 O o h ao '*1 m'TI'*1�l Ti''1'*i m m m Tl m TI m�l m m TI m TI"*1 m TI TI m TI m m TI'rl'Tl"Tl�1 m Tl•�l'rl'T7"�l m m m l'Tl�l TI TI �' O O (g _,TAI ^O U A A?A??A A P w W w W W W W W W ,N N N N N N N N N IV (O 00 J 1 U 1 w N z i' Q � O O OD 01 U A W N�O tD OJ J 01 D A N O cD U V m D A W N O Q W V 01 D A W N—�O rn d O • �, --�iow--w(nNNvrncn(nU�wmz N O: t26".,., 01 m,,.10,,N—U.p N W J 00 OD ?p V cO,OD m 01 A U p N,W N OD .A 01 O N t0 N W O 01 N U c0 z m , IC 2 ,.., ►{,j 01 N r9 A 01 OD c0 W'P J Q OD N c0 N CD A 01 N 01 a cD V O W O O V N P P O l A 01 01 cD P c0 N N O U c0 !=D! h 0 �1 �7 r ti -13 o 1� c° % zcnN(nzrnzNcncnrnvlz zcn(�yrcnul�lcnNNrnulv>cn�vlzz z zzzcncncnvlcnzin n(nvlinwulcn� �1 • t(N µa.coW Do W U 01 N OD V OO W O N v1 w O N O W N O v 0.p A N P O W V O O A O W O O W Xl �y V V U N U c0 01 p U tD V O U N V 01 U O ? OAD W N�l U W N OD N 01 A O U A 0i O O A A c0 U U O O c0 m g g (P j (4 N O 2 W-g U(P N rJ p N O g U N W v , O N N N(AJC�OUD cD(O p �cA cD I O W A l0 p N N�U O c0 J N OD U J OD ril U-U W A W N�P U U N A P W N O O(n N U U A A U U U N U U W .p{'p W�W ?— N (.,W.p O A Z --P A W A W OD?V 01;01�W cD�c0�!U A W IO 01 W�cp 4 p c0 OD V N J J J O t0 U N D O CD p N V!O G7 C'+ f� b g g rn r,,,, Ri ri r g g� �g�� - r fl p, ,; Ri ri�Rim,,,, �,,,r, i g ,,,,, ., v CJ _ O m mo ril I .8 0 03 N:\185050\NEIGHIO\P ARG\FINAL PLAT\FPiOG-OB.DWG 2-01 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: August 1,2001 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF REQUEST FOR SPONSORSHIP OF NORTHWEST IlVITIATNE TRANSPORTATION MEETING SUMMARY: A request has been received by the United Way of Greater Tucson to use the Town Council Chambers for the purpose of holding a community forum regarding transportation issues on Wednesday, August 8, 2001 from 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. If the Town Council agrees to sponsor this event, the usage fee will be waived. United Way has provided an insurance certificate naming the Town as an additional insured effective during this meeting. SUGGESTED MOTION: T MOVE to approve the sponsorship of a forum to discuss transportation issues hosted by United Way of reater Tucson scheduled for Wednesday, August 8, 2001 from 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Application from United Way of Greater Tucson Dep ment Head Town Manager • Unified Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona June 29, 2001 330 N.Commerce Park Loop,Ste.200 P.O. Box 86750 Tucson,AZ 85754-6750 Phone 520.903.9000 Fax 520.903.9002 Kathi Cuvalier email uwgt@uwtucson.theriver.com Town Clerk www.unitedwaytucson.org Town of Oro Valley 2000/2001 Board of Directors 11000 N. La Canada Drive Officers Richard W.Krivel,Chair Tucson,Arizona 85737 Executive Vice President National Bank of Arizona Thomas L.Roof,Jr.,Chair-Elect RE: Northwest Initiative Transportation Meeting Community Volunteer Edmund B.Parker,President and CPO August 8, 2001, 4:00"'6:00 P.M. United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Alexandra Master-Judge,Corporate Secretary Communications Project Manager Raytheon Company Dear Kathi: Richard("Dick")Hammel,Treasurer Hammel&Co.,PC Members Thank you for your help with our Facilities Use Application. I am Carl Bedford,Council Ward IV Carla Blackwell,CLB Development Co. enclosing the completed application, the Release / Hold Harmless JNeal oe Coyle,Raytheon Company b Eckel, ckel,PC Sally Ga za Fernandez,The Fernandez Group Agreement, and our certificate of insurance. If you require additional Nanci Beizer Fink,Meta West Training&Consulting gr Maxine Henig,Community Volunteer documentation,please contact me at 903.9000,Extension 715. Adaline Klemmedson,University Medical Center Ted Lawton,Tucson Newspapers Richard Miranda,Tucson Police Department Richard T.Myers,Jr.,IBM Corporation Dennis Nelson,Tucson Electric Power Company Please note that I have not, at this time, enclosed payment for use of the Christina Palacios,Southwest Gas Corporation Bruce Read,MESA International,Inc. facilities. We are requesting that the Oro ValleyTown Council consider Ian Robertson,Southern Arizona Central Labor Council Frank Romero,United Way Agency Executives Association s onsoring this important community forum. ROscar Torres,on Russell,IBM Corporation p Honeywell Dan Vance,Expr sPersonnel ServicesSystems Company Juan Vargas,Raytheon Company Beth Walkup,Walkup Enterprises,Inc. Kathi, thank you once again, for your assistance in coordinating meeting Mark Zupan,The University of Arizona space for United Way. I look forward to hearing from you regarding the 2000/2001 Community Advisory Board PAlvaro A.Alvarez,U.S.Postal Service Council's decision as to sponsorship. Ron Bergamo,KWBA-TV Grace Carroll,Southern Arizona Labor John L.Claps,Northern Trust Bank Linda Cohen,Caliber Communications Group Sincerely, Peter Davis,Zurick,Davis&Co.,LLC G.S."GG"Grombacher,United Way of Sierra Vista& Cochise County Dr.Robert Jensen,Pima Community College Benny McCabe,Tucson Indian Center 197 Forrest Metz,Urban Engineering Mark Mitchell,Mitchell&Roediger ded/ ' William F.Patient,Community Volunteer 1�� James E.Pfeifer,Community Volunteer Maura J. Kwiatkowski. Dina Rojas-Sanchez,United Way of Santa Cruz County Sarah R.Simmons,Brown&Bain Bob Suarez,RS Engineering Special Assistant to the President Pamela Treadwell-Rubin,Bury,Moeller,Humphery &O'Meara Albert Vasquez,El Saguarito Andrew Vigneau,Target Stores Steve Villaescusa,Raytheon Company Enclosures Yvette Villamana,Pinnacle Mortgage,LLC Colonel Bobby J.Wilkes,U.S.Air Force Kay Wilma,Community Volunteer CC: Ed Parker, President, UWTSA TSA Barry M.Corey,Legal Counsel Hank Roraback, Executive Vice President, UWTSA Karen Lee Rice,Raytheon Company ,;‘,2:;4,4V,Ot. ,‘, � s Building A setter Community GIVE HOPE A -AN_.... Jun-20-01 03:22pm From-TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 5202970428 T-147 P.01/01 F-823 vlb/ , r Ata TOWN OF ORO VALLEY ,F�uNDEO e1A APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO USE MUNICIPAL FACILITIES Name of Organization: i217LteL___ :{ /40501) G441 Si'uj�r� r/Zana Mailing Address: r• O. Zox / SóY ) 41/* j. /14 �S? 7 Person Responsible: Rrel? Lem IG'-e-=' UDhtrI teer' Telephone: (work) 2_9 "" Jit 9:Y _ (home) c62% ‘3,v /O Date of Application: uu�P�. f ?00 / Municipal Facility Requested: vQlli1 C dIi, . er �_______ Dates Requested: OYO / Time Requested 41:a0 PR to '. 02 Type of Event: /leLQ Gll,SL''!!� 7;441ffar-/ i1 /J54/ 5 Estimated Number of Participants: _ Number of Hours: Have you used Town facilities within the last 12 months? NO If so, when? _ /U .71 Insurance Policy No.: 0 /f Quo Insurance Agent: �G /% e/n4/ 1454ra46e. Key issued to: Telephone: dcin '1 S�o orsfi� Permit Fee Paid: $ yesl'G� ` Date NOTE; Signature below acknowledges that the authorized representative has read and agrees to abide by all rules and regulations outlined in town Council Policy No. 4. Insurance Certification and payment of fees should be attached and submitted at the time of application. Make checks payable to Town of Oro Valley. /1. 1-01... —267 Authorized Signature Pres14/04t C Date Approved: Town Clerk Date FAforms1municipal facilities Jun-20-01 03:22pm prom-TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 52028 T-147 P.91)/01 F-822 1an, SD r �'Organization Name. 44 RELEASE, HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNITY AGREEMENT FOR USE OP FACILITIES ;4 UM;id 9517 441 S(4YJI 412014 agrees to release and (Organiztin Name) hold harmless and indemnify the Town of Oro Valley, its officers, employees and agents, from any and all losses, liability, claims, actions, suits or damages including, but not limited to, personal injury damages (including death) or property damages which arise, result, or otherwise might be attributable to any use of the facilities provided to me by the Town of Oro Valley. This Release, Hold Harmless and Indemnity Agreement includes any cause whatsoever, including negligence o f any and all of those persons specified as being released above. THE UNDERSIGNED CERTIFIES THAT HE/SHE IS THE AGENT OFJA2g...L14744 t(� a r/Z4 � IS ACTING ON THEIR/ITS BEHALF AND IS DULY � AUTHORIZED TO SIGN THIS RELEASE, HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNITY AGREEMENT ON THEIR/ITS BEHALF. THE UNDERSIGNED HAS READ THIS AGREEMENT FULLY, UNDERSTANDS ITS CONTENTS AND HAS VOLUNTARILY EXECUTED IT. DATED this 747 day of , 12241L 11 "41,4 (Signature) Pce�ih4f 4/1." (Office Title) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me by z5,410.1( g Arker. this day of �� - • • , notary Public • Myy ComImiseion • a OF-F1C/AL. SEAL • _ z �' :�► : KOWS KI;. NOTARY PUBLIC-ARIZONA ... PIMA COUNTY ''4My Comm. Expires May 8,2003 COMMERCIAL CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE Issue Date (MMIDDIYY) • AGENCY 06-25-01. Name FRED FREEMAN INSURANCE 4803 E 5TH ST #209 This certificate is issued as a matter of information only and confers no rights Address TUCSON, AZ 85711 upon the certificate holder. This certificate does not amend, extend or alter the • coverage afforded by the policies shown below. COMPANIES PROVIDING COVERAGE: ST. 88 DIST. 29 AGENT 398 COMPANY LETTER A TRUCK INSURANCE EXCHANGE INSURED COMPANY ▪ UNITED WAY OF GREATER TUCSON LETTER g FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE Name • DBA UNITED WAY COMPANY $ 330 N COMMERCE PARK LOOP LETTER C MID-CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY Address • TUCSON, AZ 85745 COMPANY LETTER D COVERAGES THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED.NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT. TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE --f-- AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS CO POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION T R TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER DATE (MM/DD/YY) DATE (MM/DD/YY) POLICY LIMITS GENERAL A X GENERAL LIABILITY 60072 18 06 08-19-00 08-19-01 AGGREGATE $ 1,000, 000 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY PRODUCTS COMPIOPS — OCCURRENCE VERSION AGGREGATE $ CONTRACTUAL INCIDENTAL ONLY PERSONAL& OWNERS&CONTRACTORS PROT ADVERTISING INJURY $ EACH OCCURRENCE $ FIRE DAMAGE(Any one Fire) $ MEDICAL EXPENSE (Any one person) $ I 1 4 f AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $ ALL OWNED COMMERCIAL AUTOS BODILY INJURY SCHEDULED AUTOS (PER PERSON) $ HIRED AUTOS BODILY INJURY NON OWNED AUTOS (PER ACCIDENT) $ GARAGE LIABILITY PROPERTY DAMAGE $ ` _ _ GARAGE AGGREGATE $ •UMBRELLA LIABILITY LIMIT $ WORKERS'COMPENSATION STATUTORY AND EACH ACCIDENT $ DISEASE—EACH EMPLOYEE $ EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY DISEASE—POLICY LIMIT $ - - - _ - - DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONSIVEHICLESIRESTRICTIONS/SPECIAL ITEMS: **THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY IS NAMED AS ADDITIONAL INSURED CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION NameSHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF. • THE WN THE HISSUINCOMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER TO OF ORO VALLEY NAMED TO THE LEFT,BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF Address • ANY KIND UPON THE COMPANY,ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES. \----7-- - ,/=.;\ AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 56-2492 4-94 1251 A-96 1351 • Y July 12, 2001 0�i United Wag of Tucson and Paul Loomis Southern Arizona Mayor 330 N.Commerce Park Loop,Ste.200 Town of Oro Valley P.O. Box 86750 Tucson,AZ 85754-6750 11000 N. La Canada Drive Phone 520.903.9000 Tucson, AZ 85737 Fax 520.903.9002 email uwgt@uwtucson.theriver.com www.unitedwaytucson.org Dear Paul: 2000/2001 Board of Directors Several months ago, United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona, in Officers Richard W.Knvel,Chair partnership with Honeywell, held a meeting for interested community Executive Vice President National Bank of Arizona leaders to discuss ways to collaborate more effectively to address critical Thomas L.Roof,Jr.,Chair-Elect Community Volunteer issues in our community. The focus was specifically on the Northwest Edmund B.Parker,President and CPO Area of the metropolitan region. United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Alexandra Master-Judge,Corporate Secretary Communications Project Manager Transportation was identified as a toppriority. Based on the feedback Raytheon Company p p Richard("Dick")Hammel,Treasurer from the meeting, United Way agreed to convene a forum to discuss Hammel&Co.,PC supplemental transportation options and to identify feasible action steps. Members PPCarl Bedford,Council Ward IV Our objective is to brie¢gg together stakeholders to explore partnerships Carla Blackwell,CLB Development Co. b Joe Coyle,Raytheon Company among members of the private,public and nonprofit sectors with theg oal Neal Eckel,Durazzo&Eckel,PC Sally Garza Fernandez,The Fernandez Group Nanci Beizer Fink,MetaWest Training&Consulting of achieving locally driven solutions. Maxine Henig,Community Volunteer Adaline Klemmedson,University Medical Center Ted Lawton,Tucson Newspapers Richard Miranda,Tucson Police Department You are cordially invited to attend a meeting to be held Wednesday, Richard T.Myers,Jr.,IBM Corporation Dennis Nelson,Tucson Electric Power Company Christina Palacios Southwest Gas Corporation August 8, 2001, from 4:00 to 6:00 PM, at the Oro Valley Town Hall, Bruce Read,MESA International,Inc. Ian Robertson,Southern Arizona Central Labor Council Council Chambers located at 11000 N. La Canada Drive. The Frank Romero,United Way Agency Executives Association he Ron Russell,IBM Corporation agenda will be to identify specific steps to help resolve Oscar Torres,Honeywell Engines&Systems Company Dan Vance,Express Personnel Services Juan Vargas,Raytheon Company transportation needs in the Northwest region and to begin to Beth Walkup,Walkup Enterprises,Inc. p Mark Zupan,The University of Arizona develop action-oriented partnerships. 2000/2001 Community Advisory Board Alvaro A.Alvarez,U.S.Postal Service Ron Bergamo,KWBA-TV Please RSVP your attendance to Terry Waters at United Way at Grace Carroll,Southern Arizona Labor John L.Claps,Northern Trust Bank 903,9000j Ext. 750, a t twa tensor via email (u wucson.tthere ver.com. Linda Cohen,Caliber Communications Group Peter Davis,Zurick,Davis&Co.,LLC G.S."GG"Grombacher,United Way of Sierra Vista& Cochise County Dr.Robert Jensen,Pima Community College We appreciate your interest in this issue and look forward to -your Benny McCabe,Tucson Indian Center Forrest Metz,Urban Engineering participation. Mark Mitchell,Mitchell&Roediger William F.Patient,Community Volunteer James E.Pfeifer,Community Volunteer Dina Rojas-Sanchez,United Way of Santa Cruz County Sarah R.Simmons,Brown&Bain yTES TO: wrySincerel ' DISTRIBPamela Treadwell-Rubin,Bu Moeller,Humpher &O'Meara Albert Vasquez,El Saguarito TOWNA ��� Andrew Vigneau,Target Stores 11;41-e-**.rIYf�� H Steve Villaescusa,Raytheon Company 1rr1Yvette Villamana,Pinnacle Mortgage,LLC Et . I� Colonel Bobby J.Wilkes,U.S.Air Force Ed J ���� � � �� Kay Wilma,Community Volunteer Barry M.Corey,Legal Counsel Edmund B. Parker 0 DEPT HEADS 0 OTHER \,•--, . . ,.:.,. President and CEO `�, ci...., -J iif 4 cc: Karen Lee Rice, Raytheon Company V+ s, .cad:;tw,Y �z;�; Tom Cowdry, Miracle Square, Inc. fir► �". `e' ..ops�i:7-.. : CommunityGIVE HOPE A HAND -��°�� Building A Better TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: August 1, 2001 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & TOWN COUNCIL FROM: Chuck Sweet, Town Manager SUBJ: Ordinance No. (0) 01- 22 Amending Section 3-5-5 of the Oro Valley Town Code BACKGROUND: Pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes, incorporated Arizona communities must have designated members to a Board of Adjustment (BOA). As a result, from 1974 through 1984, the Oro Valley Town Council served as the Board of Adjustment. In September of 1984, the Town Council appointed the first five residents to serve on the Town of Oro Valley Board of Adjustment. The Town's current Board of Adjustment is a five-member Board whose members are appointed by the Town Council. Recently, while researching the appointment process for the BOA, a conflict was discovered, and currently exists, between the Town Council Policies and Procedures and the Town Code for appointments to the BOA. Below is the text of the two policies: Town Council Policy, Section X. - Appointment of Commissions, Committees, Advisory Boards (policy adopted 2/7/96) All appointments shall follow this procedure. The Town Clerk shall advertise to fill the vacancies of all commissions, committees and advisory boards. Upon receipt of the applications, the Town Manager, the Council Liaison and the Chair of the Commission, Board or Committee needing the member shall review the applications and conduct whatever interviews are necessary. The Town Manager, Council Liaison and Chair shall submit a list of not more than three finalists to the Council for their consideration. The Council will make the final determination of appointments from this list. All committee appointments must be made by a majority vote of the Council or as established in the Town Code. Town Code Chapter 3, Section 3-5-5 Board of Adjustment (amended 5/5/93) There is hereby established a board of adjustment for the Town of Oro Valley. The board shall consist of five members. Each member of the council shall designate one nominee to the board. Each nominee shall be appointed by the Council. Members of the board shall serve at the pleasure of the council for a term of two years. Any vacancy shall be filled by the council for the unexpired term. Members shall serve without compensation and shall be residents of the town. In 1996 with the adoption of the Town Council Policies and Procedures, it was the Council's intent to streamline the Board and Commission appointment process with creation of Section X of the policy. However, while the Council was successful in simplifying the interview and appointment process, there still existed in the Town Code, Chapter 3, Section 3-5-5 wording which relates to the appointment process of the Board of Adjustment. In researching this item, I can only determine that this section remained in the Town Code for no other reason than a simple oversight at that time. RECOMMENDATIONS: I am therefore recommending that the Town Council adopt the attached Ordinance which amends Town Code Chapter 3, Section 3-5-5 Board of Adjustment to read as follows: The Town of Oro Valley Board of Adjustment shall consist of five members. Members shall serve two year terms. Members must be Oro Valley residents. Members will be appointed to the Board of Adjustment by the Town Council as per the adopted policy for Appointments to Boards, Commissions and Advisory Bodies of the Town. By adopting this Ordinance, the Town will be consistent with its interview and appointment process for all Town Boards and Commissions. ATTACHMENTS: 1) Ordinance No. (0) 01- 22 Amending Chapter 3, Section 3- 5-5 , Board of Adjustment, of the Code of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to Adopt Ordinance (0) 01-22 Amending Chapter 3, Section 3-5-5 , Board of Adjustment, of the Code of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona Or 7/A) aiA-R - Town Manager I ORDINANCE NO. (0) 01-22 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA AMENDING CHAPTER 3, SECTION 3-5-5 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CODE OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA WHEREAS, in February 1996, the Oro Valley Town Council adopted that certain document to be known as the Town Council Policies and Procedures; and WHEREAS, by the adoption of the Policies and Procedures, the Council adopted Section X of the Policies, Appointment of Commissions, Committees and Advisory Boards; and WHEREAS, following the adoption of the Policies and Procedures, Paragraph A of Chapter 3, Section 3-5-5 remained as part of the Town Code. A section within Paragraph A directly conflicts with the adopted Policies and Procedures. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona that Chapter 3, Section 3-5-5 of the Town Code of Oro Valley, Arizona is hereby amended as follows: The Town of Oro Valley Board of Adjustment shall consist of five members. Members shall serve two year terms. Members must be Oro Valley residents. Members will be appointed to the Board of Adjustment by the Town Council as per the adopted policy for Appointments to Boards, Commissions and Advisory Bodies of the Town. PASSED and ADOPTED by the mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, this 1st day of August, 2001. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Paul H. Loomis Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn E. Cuvelier, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Dan L. Dudley, Town Attorney Sent By: ACTA; 6029554505; Jul-27-01 3:47PM; Page 2/2 , . , ,, 3 MIIII0611 , '111 . . Pr1414— Niillair . CHN1CAL SOLUTIONS •:' 1 r . . July 27, 20 1 €1) • • .::: --, r:.' .!. 7 ;.F', t i:it, ..---:.. •.:'.. .....,.:,,...... ..--.. f V' Ms. S ange ta Jain Planner IT Town of 0o Valley 11000 N. I. a Canada Drive 1- ..: ;.,.. • . . . • :• .• .• • , . . . : • Oro Valley Arizona 85737 Re: Reque t For Continuance Of Case OV6-01-01 • Dear Ms, J in • • • : .. . : . : • Technical olinions, on behalf of AT&T Wireless, respectfully equests the continuance of case 0V6-01-0 from August 1 to September 5 in order to refine the design plans that we discussed with your - afT and Mayor Loomis. This will give us time to thoroughly address their questions and investi at.T... additional design options. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. • • Sincerely. • :SusanBittck Smith R•ec i -c.,,,c__C I re ,;r =Vr' cc: Beth Davi.lson Laura 11Joop JUL 27 2001 : , , • • : . • . . . , • • • ,.• • , .3610 N. 44th Street-,St:ite 2410 • Phoenix, Arizona 85018 • (602) 957 .3434 II/NX (602) 955-4505 • E-Mail: techsnitgoodnet.com i COUNCIL COMMUNICATION TOWN OF ORO VALLEY MEETING DATE: August 1, 2001 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Bayer Vella, AICP, Senior Planner SUBJECT: OV6-01-01, AT&T WIRELESS APPEAL OF JUNE 12,2001 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD DECISION TO DENY THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST FOR A TIER I MINOR TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITY --LOCATED IN THE COMMON AREA OF ESTATES OF HONEY BEE CANYON (PARCEL #219202840) AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD AND QUIET RAIN DRIVE BACKGROUND: At their regular meeting of June 12, 2001, the Development Review Board (DRB) voted unanimously (4-0) to deny the above-mentioned request. The denial was primarily based on concerns, raised by adjacent neighbors, regarding adverse visual and noise impacts. Per Section 3-303B2 of Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised g g (OVZCR): "The Development Review Board may deny a total development, or a portion of a development, ifthey find that any conditions of this article, the General Plan or the development policies and standards of the Town of Oro Valley have not been complied with". Subsequently, thea applicant filed an appeal on July 2, 2001. A decision of the DRB may be appealed per Sec 3- pp pp 3- 304 of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised (OVZCR) as follows: "The approval, with or without conditions, or denial by the Development Review Board of an application subject to the provisions of Sec. 3-303, or otherwise referenced in this code, shall be final unless, within 20 days from the date of the Board's decisions, the applicant shall appeal therefrom in writing to the Town Council. Such appeal shall be in writing in care of the Town Clerk and shall indicate where, in the opinion of the appellant, the Board was in error " SUMMARY: The site located at the northeast corner of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard and Quiet Rain Drive -- near the entrance to the Estates at Honey Bee Ridge. It abuts the west-side of the 100-foot wide WAPA easement that runs north/south between the Estates (west) and Sun City Vistoso Unit 5 (east). There are two components of the proposed telecommunication facility - antenna and ground equipment: • The proposed antenna will be collocated on an existing WAPA pole located within the WAPA easement. This area is designated as Open Space within the Rancho Vistoso PAD. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY )UNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 3 • The (transformers equipment qd roune ui etc.) is proposed to be housed in a 14' by 20' structure. The g p proposed structure would be located west of the 100' wide WAPA easement in the Common Area 'A' of the Estates at Honey Bee Ridge (see attached map). ISSUES For a detailed briefing of all issues and concerns, please refer to the attached Development Review Board report. NEW INFORMATION In an attempt to alleviate concerns of adjacent property owners, the applicant is considering vaulting the equipment building entirely underground. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENT REGARDING APPEAL: Each nearbyHomeowners Association and all property owners within 300 feet of the site were notified of thepublic hearing. To date, staff has received one public comment regarding the appeal. Mr. Michael g Carroll, adjacent property owner, expressed concern regarding the timeliness of the appeal. The OVZCR p p ,ecifies that an appeal must be submitted "within 20 days from the date of the DRB decision". Via an interpretation by the Planning & Zoning Administrator, the 20-day timeframe begins the first day after the Development Review Board decision. In accord with this interpretation,the applicant submitted on the last possible day. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD (DRB) ACTION: The DRB denied the application based on concerns voiced by adjacent property owners. Several property owners were in attendance and each remains concerned about potential negative impacts. The applicant was unable-to sufficiently accommodate issues raised by the public at either of the neighborhood meetings (two were orchestrated) or before the DRB. Specific concerns raised by adjacent property owners at the DRB meeting are depicted in the attached "Draft" minutes. RECOMMENDATION: Because thero osed facility meets all pertinent requirements of the General Plan, OVZCR and Rancho p p Vistoso PAD, staff recommended approval of the ATT&T application to DRB. SUGGESTED MOTIONS: I move to approve OV6-01-01, AT&T Wireless PCS Tier I Minor Communication Facility, with the conditions 'ncluded as part of Exhibit A. OR \\oV PZD\PZ 1\ov\ov6\2001\06-01-01\TC Appeal Report.doc TOWN OF ORO VALLEY OUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 3 of 3 I move to approve OV6-01-01, AT&T Wireless PCS Tier I Minor Communication Facility, with the conditions included as part of Exhibit A and the following additional condition(s): OR I move to deny 0VO6-01-01, AT&T Wireless PCS Tier I Minor Communication Facility, finding that: Attachments: 1. Appeal Request 2. DRB Packet 3. DRB Minutes I 14 v= Planni • Zoning Administrator / / w Community Deve opment Director ach Town Manager -— \\OV PZD\PZ 1\OV\OV6\2001\06-01-01\TC Appeal Report.doc Exhibit A Conditions of Approval OV6-01-01 1. The Environmental Assessment report for the proposed site, as required by the OVZCR, shall be submitted to the Town prior to application for building permits. 2. Under no circumstances may an Emergency Generator be audible from adjacent residential properties. 3. The air conditioner utilized may not generate and/or project more noise than can be reasonable anticipated by a 4-ton residential unit. 4. The future DRB landscape plan submittal must substantially mimic the draft landscape plan. Sent By: ACTA; 602 955 4505; Jul-2-01 17:03; Page 2/2 AT&T 3610 N. 44th Street—Suite 240 Phoenix, Arizona 85018 (602)957-3434 FAX: (602)955-4505 June 29, 2001 Town of Oro alley Kathy Cuvelier Town Clerk 11000 N. La C: i ida Drive Oro Valley, 85737 Re: •V6-01-01 AT&T Wireless PCS Tier 1 Minor Communication Facility ocated at Quiet Rain and Rancho Vistoso Boulevard Dear Ms. Cuv=i iei In accordance it Section 3-304, Appeal and Town Council Review, of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised, AT& Wireless hereby appeals the Design Review Board's June 12, 2001 denial of application 0V6-01-01 for an AT&T Wireless PCS Tier l Minor Communication Facility. AT&T Wireless believes that th- denial on the basis of adverse noise and visual impacts was in error based on the following: 1. dverse Noise: The proposed air conditioning units are residential type four(4)ton nits which will notp roduce noise in excess of any similar unit being used nearby. •u;vorting documentation was provided to the Design Review Board. 2. Impacts: The AT&T Wireless proposal meets all pertinent code requirements Section 9-117b) in terms of height and width of the pole; furthermore, the antennas re stealthed, and the equipment is well screened with vegetation. Photo simulations ere provided to the Design Review Board. AT&T Wireles. respectfully requests that the Town Council overrule the Design Review Board's p y June 12, 2001 ecision and t-• t approval of the request, as previously recommended by staff, with the conditions sti f lat ed in t • report prepared by Bayer Vella, Senior Planner, and Sangeeta Jain, Planner 11. Sincere ,. 1 woo Pr A.PWA digry Paul Smith, Te,hr..ical Solutions For AT&T cc: Bryan iodine, Oro Valley Planning and Zoning Administrator ITEM ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION STAFF REPORT TO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Meeting Date: June 12, 2001 TO: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD FROM: Bayer Vella, AICP, Senior Planner Sangeeta Jain, Planner II SUBJECT: OV6-01-01, AT&T WIRELESS PCS TIER I MINOR COMMUNICATION FACILITY LOCATED IN THE COMMON AREA OF ESTATES OF HONEY BEE CANYON AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD AND QUITE RAIN DRIVE BACKGROUND: Infranext on behalf of AT&T Wireless Services, requests approval to construct a Tier I minor communication pp facility. If approved, the facility will be located at the northeast corner of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard and Quiet Rain Drive -- near the entrance to the Estates at Honey Bee Ridge. The site abuts the west-side of the 100-foot wide WAPA easement that runs north/south between the Estates (west) and Sun City Vistoso Unit 5 (east). There are two components of the proposed telecommunication facility-antenna and ground equipment: 1. The proposed antenna will be collocated on an existing WAPA pole located within the WAPA easement. This area is designated as Open Space within the Rancho Vistoso PAD. 2. Theg round equipment (transformers etc.) will be housed in a 14' by 20' structure. The proposed structure will be located west of the 100' wide WAPA easement in the Common Area 'A' of the Estates at Honey Bee Ridge (see attached map). For zoning purposes, this area is designated as Very Low Residential within the PAD. There is; however, a plat requirement that this area be retained as "Common Area A (Natural Open Space)". "Natural Open Space" denotes that the site must remain undisturbed. An access road already exists and the proposed location for the AT&T equipment building has already been disturbed, as it was previously used to house a construction trailer. Because the proposed facility would not infringe on existing areas that are truly natural and the proposed landscaping would enhance existing disturbed areas, the Planning & Zoning Administrator has made the interpretation that the use would not violate the intent of the plat designation. This is actually the second application to utilize this site. The first application was rejected due to non- compliance with zoning. When the Parks and Open Space zoning district was created two years ago, it did not include communications facilities as a permitted use. This was not a conscious decision; it was an omission--all ther zoning districts enable communication facilities. As a result, AT&T requested that the Town revise the Code to allow communication facilities in open space. This change and a host of others were recently ordinanced by the Town Council. Over the past year, AT&T has unsuccessfully pursued establishing communication facilities in Stone Canyon ad Sun City. SUMMARY Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised (OVZCR) As depicted below, the proposed project meets all pertinent code requirements (Sec 9-117b) in terms of height and width of the pole. Existing Proposed Max Allowed by OVZCR for Minor Tier I Pole Height 55.8' 61.8' 67' (up to 20% increase in original Height) Pole Diameter 18" 28" 28.8" (up to 60% increase in original diameter) Stealth Camouflaging: The zoning code provides that all communication facilities must utilize stealth design techniques. In sum, antennas and equipment buildings must be architecturally integrated and/or compatible with the surrounding environment. The following design applications are proposed: • Antennae: The antenna will be housed within a cylindrical "can" so that it will appear as a structural part of the existing pole. Furthermore, it will be painted to match the color of the existing pole. Building: Overall, the design and stonework will match the Estates entrance monuments. The structure will be dominated by "Vistoso Stone" on each façade. It will also be positioned into the side of the hill leading up to the WAPA easement. The top of the building will project over the crown of the WAPA easement by several feet. As depicted on the landscape plan, the proposed building will be heavily screened with vegetation on all four sides. Review Process: As per Sec 9-117b of the Oro Valley Zoning Code (OVZCR), this type of facility is considered a Tier I Communication Facility. Tier I facilities may be administratively approved by the Planning and Zoning Administrator or forwarded to the Development Review Board (DRB) for approval. Due to opposition by adjacent property owners, this project was referred to DRB for consideration. Public Notification: As required in the zoning code, all property owners within 300 feet of the proposed facility were notified and provided a 15-day period to comment. Staff received many written and phone responses (see attached letters). The following is an abbreviated synopsis of the primary concerns specified and a brief staff response: • Proximity to existing homes: The primary concern specified is the proximity of the equipment building to residential properties. The table on the following page includes information regarding surrounding land uses. F:\OV\OV6\2001\06-01-O 1\DRB Report.doc 2 ORIENTATION LAND USE DISTANCE OF NEAREST PROPERTY LINE FROM PROPOSED EQUIPMENT BUILDNG North Lot 18 (44,200 s.f.), Estates at Honey 48.22' Bee Ridge East Lots 10, 11 & 12 (6,935 to 10,425 126' s.f.), Sun City Vistoso Southeast Town of Oro Valley Water Tank Approx. 160' —abuts southern edge of Sun City Vistoso lot 12. South RV Boulevard and Common Area Approx. 270' West Common Area (Natural Open Approx. 100' Space) Northwest Lot 17 (65,233 s.f.), Estates at Honey Approx. 150' Bee Ridge • Inadequacy of notification: Notification was orchestrated per zoning code requirements. Over the course of two neighborhood meetings, staff developed a mailing list and two property owners assisted staff in revising the Pima County Assessor based mailing list to insure accuracy. Several residents were concerned that the notification did not include all property owners within the Estates of Honey Bee Ridge. • Satellite reception interference: Per the applicant,the facility will not affect television reception in the area. • Noise impact from air conditioning units: The adjacent Sun City Vistoso lot owners are particularly sensitive to any potential noise impacts. The Town of Oro Valley water well site (abutting lot 12) reportedly creates a disturbance when the pumps turn on. Per the applicant, two 4-ton air conditioning units will be utilized during the summer months to cool the electronic equipment. The units will run alternately and not simultaneously. In addition, there is a stucco c.m.0 wall and a layer of opaque vegetation around the ac units to help mitigate the noise level. According to the applicant, the units are similar to the ones installed in nearby residences. In emergency situations, generators would be utilized. Staff recommends restrictions regarding the type of generators used (see Exhibit A). • Visual impact: As previously mentioned, the design of the equipment building is the primary concern. There are two basic approaches to minimizing visual impacts: a. Partially Submerge the Building Underground and Utilize Extensive Architectural and Landscaping Treatments: As depicted in the attached elevations, the applicant wishes to utilize Vistoso Stone treatments on all sides of the building. Relief in the walls has been provided via wall indentations. Furthermore, the roofline undulates considerably. In the end, the structure resembles a territorial style guardhouse— which is the same theme used for the nearby subdivision entry gates. F:\ov\ov6\2ooi\o6-ol-o 1\DRB Report.doc 3 Finally, all four sides of the structure have been heavily landscaped with the intent of creating an opaque vegetative screen. b. Entirely Submerge the Building Underground This option has been discussed with the applicant. The building could literally be buried entirely underground. Byincorporating the landscaping already planned, the building would be removed from rp g p property view of all surroundingowners. According to the applicant, the project cost would be similar to the previous proposal. Maintenance costs; however, are higher. • Lighting impact: Outdoor lights will not be utilized. • T he need for additional cellular coverage within the immediate area has not been established: (Please see the applicationAT&T's response for to this issue.) This is an issue outside of the realm of zoning code considerations. The orientation of the code is collocation and stealth design. • Does this site have to be utilized? What's the availability of other sites — particularly in commercial areas: see thea lication for AT&T's response to this issue.) From staff's perspective, this site does not (Please pp intent to be utilized. There are alternatives; however, the proposed facility meets the and letter of zoning code requirements. • Appropriateness ro riateness of locatinga cellular facility in a high-end residential area: Communication facilities are a permitted use in all residential zoning districts. Based on the extensive neighborhood concerns, staff required the applicant to conduct two neighborhood meetings. The first one was held on April 23, 2001. Each of the aforementioned issues was discussed. In addition,there were concerns about the lease agreement signed by the applicant and the Estates Homeowners .ssociation. The residents of the Estates are upset that they were not informed by their HOA about the lease agreement. AT&T is remunerating the HOA for the lease of the project site. In an attempt to resolve remainingissues from the first meeting, staff required the applicant to provide another meeting. meeting The second was held on May 15, 2001 at the project site. The applicant erected stakes at the proposed shelter location to demonstrate the height and visual impact of the proposed structure. The owner of Sun CityLot 11 requested two design considerations: 1) lowering the building height by 18" 2) provision of q g heavylandscaping alongthe east side of the building. The applicant responded by lowering the building by 16" p g and incorporating additional landscaping. Overall, theartici atin g neighbors would like the facility to be located elsewhere. Attempts to steer the p p g g conversation in the direction of specific design issues were generally unproductive. Participants did not approve of the proposed design nor were they interested in the concept of entirely undergrounding the facility. pp p p g OVZCR DESIGN GUIDELINES: All four sides of the structure have been comprehensively treated and the roofline has been varied significantly. Desert colors and rock textures have been incorporated and match the nearby subdivision entry monuments. Furthermore, the height of the buildinghas been substantially reduced to mitigate potential view impacts. g GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE: 'he new communication facility meets Goal 5.1, to ensure that adequate public facilities and services are provided when needed. Furthermore, the proposed facility complies with Community Design Element policies F:\OV\OV6\2001\06-01-01\DRB Report.doc 4 by insuring that the structure is low-lying to preserve views from surrounding properties and all four sides of the structures are "coherently designed and treated." RECOMMENDATION: Planning staff finds that the application meets all pertinent OVZCR zoning code requirements. Staff recommends approval of this project, with the conditions included in Exhibit 'A". SUGGESTED MOTIONS: I move to approve OV6-01-01, AT&T Wireless PCS Tier I Minor Communication Facility, with the conditions included as part of Exhibit A. OR I move to approve OV6-01-01, AT&T Wireless PCS Tier I Minor Communication Facility, with the conditions included as part of Exhibit A and the following additional condition(s): OR I move to deny OVO6-01-01, AT&T Wireless PCS Tier I Minor Communication Facility, finding that: Attachments: 1. Project Application 2. Photo Simulations 3. Draft Landscape Plan 4. Citizen Letters F:\ov\ov6\2ooi\o6-o1-o 1\DRB Report.doc 5 y L Exhibit A Conditions of Approval 0V6-01-01 1. The Environmental Assessment report for the proposed site, as required by the OVZCR, shall be submitted to the Town prior to application for building permits. 2. Under no circumstances may an Emergency Generator be audible from adjacent residential properties. 3. The air conditioner utilized may not generate and/or project more noise than can be reasonable anticipated by a 4-ton residential unit. 4. The future DRB landscape plan submittal must substantially mimic the draft landscape plan. 5. The facilities shall be identified by a permanently installed plaque or marker, no larger than four (4) inches bysix (6) inches, identifying the provider's name, address and emergency phone number. The sign clearly shall be placed in a location visible to passersby. F:\ov\ov6\2ooi\o6-o1-o 1\DRB Report.doc K:, 6 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PLANNING &ZONING DIVISION 11,000 La Canada Drive, Oro Valley, AZ 85735 TIER 1 MINOR COMMUNICATION FACILITY APPLICATION Forwarded for Review by Design Review Board June 12, 2001 Case No.: (/(,, -0 J-0 1 NATURE OF REQUEST: On behalf of AT&T Wireless Services, (ATTWS), Infranext, a Tynangroup company, respectfully requests approval for a new wireless facility consisting of ground equipment and collocation of the antenna on an adjacent WAPA pole located within Common Area A of The Estates at Honey Bee Ridge. Approval for the proposed stealth facility would allow ATTVVS to develop a new wireless facility with the least obtrusive and most aesthetically pleasing installation possible while also providing quality service coverage to the residents of Oro Valley. APPLICANT: AT&T Wireless PCS, L.L.C., (ATTWS) represented by Martha Kuenhold Project Manager, Infranext, a Tynangroup company PHONE / FAX 906-7323 /fax 797-4818 Email: Mkuenhold@infranext.com ADDRESS: 1 East Desert Sky Club, Number 2 Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 OWNER: The Estates at Honey Bee Ridge Association do LMR, 180 West Magee Road Tucson, Arizona 85704 742-5674 PARCEL NUMBER: 219-20-28402 Rancho uistaso Neighborhood 13, Parcel A PROPERTY LOCATION/ADDRESS: Quiet Rain and Rancho Vistaso Boulevard PROJECT ENGINEER: M3 Engineering 2440 W. Ruthrauff Road, Tucson, AZ 85704 293-1488 ATTACHMENTS: Copy of Application Fee $150 (paid 6/23/00) 15 copies of all attachments plus 25 for mailing APPLICANT: Date: 6, Martha Kuenhold, Infranext, Representing AT&T Wireless PCS, L.L.C. PROPERY _ OWNER: Date: 5/,, 94/ Mark Lewis, Representing The Estates at Honey Bee Ridge Homeowners Association 'TIER 1 —MINOR COMMUNICATION FACILITY APPLICATION AT&T Wireless Services/The Estates at Honey Bee Ridge Installation REQUEST: On behalf of AT&T Wireless PCS, L.L.C. (ATTWS), lnfranext, a Tynangroup company respectfully requests approval for a Tier 1 Minor Facility to construct a telecommunication facility'. on Common Area A of The Estates at Honey Bee Ridge. The facility will consist of ground equipment housed in an architectural structure and antennas collocated on an adjacent WAPA, pole. The antennas will be fully enclosed by a "can" mount and will appear to be an extension of the pole. Approval would allow ATT-WS to develop a new wireless facility with the least obtrusive and most aesthetically pleasing installation possible while providing quality service coverage to the residents of Oro Valley. BACKGROUND As part of the AT&T Wireless PCS's (ATTWS) ongoing network and service improvement, engineers at ATTVVS have identified the need for a Personal Communications Services (PCSy facility to serve the Rancho Vistoso area. Based on a computerized engineering study considering the local population density and topography, engineers at ATTVVS have issued a "search ring" identifying the necessary location for a PCS facility in the area. This search ring represents an area in which a facility must be located to allow it to function as an integral unit in'. the PCS system. PCS facilities are laid out in a grid pattern and the spacing, height and location of this component site is critical for the successful operation of the overall system The proposed antenna collocation on the WAPA pole meets the engineering criteria. SITE DESIGN`; ATTVVS is committed to develop wireless facilities with minimal visual impact. The site design can be divided into two parts: the ground lease for equipment and a second lease for the antenna collocation. GROUND EQUIPMENT ATTWS proposes to construct a building to house the ground equipment with an approximate overall dimension of 14' x 20'. Special care has been given to the design of the structure so that it is consistent with the existing neighborhood entrance monumentation in design and materials. The position of shelter was selected to best fit the contours of the site as well as utilize an area previously disturbed for the location of a construction trailer. A lease with The Estates at Honey Bee Ridge Association has been executed. Letters of architectural approval for the proposed site by both the Vistoso Community Association and The Estates at Honey Bee Ridge Homeowners Association are attached. Site plans, elevations and renderings of the proposed structure have been attached for your review. Proposed shelter location has been staked to identify corners and height. A plant inventory and revegetation plan has been attached. Once the site has been constructed per the plan specifications, The Estates at Honey Bee Ridge Association will be responsible for landscape maintenance. ANTENNA The second half of the site design consists of the collocation of the antenna (EMS 16" accelerator can with RR65-18-XXDPL2 antennas) mounted at the top of the WAPA pole within the adjacent 100' easement. The design of the antenna will be tight fitting and appear to be only a continuation of the pole. The existing WAPA pole is 55'10" in height with a diameter of 18" at the base. The WAPA pole will be changed out to structurally accommodate running the coax through the interior and for the addition of the 6' antenna mount at the top. Code allows for a 20% increase in height as well as up to a 60% increase in diameter. The height of the replaced pole will not exceed 62' and the diameter of the pole will not exceed 28'. The antenna "can" will have a diameter of 16". The replaced pole and antenna will match adjacent poles in color and overall appearance. Additional information on the antenna mount has been attached. A Letter of Acknowledgment from WAPA stating that a Master Lease Agreement with AT&T Wireless has been executed has been included for your files. A site-specific exhibit for the WAPA Agreement will be finalized after zoning approval_ NEIGHBORHOOD MEETINGS Two neighborhood meetings were held. The first on April 23rd at the Town Offices and a second on-site meeting on May 15th. A number of questions were raised in correspondence and at the meetings. A summary of the concerns follows: Lighting: No lighting of the WAPA pole is required. There will be no lights at the ground facility. Emergency generator. Emergency generators are a necessary part of the site design. The emergency generator will not be stored at the site. In the event of a power outage, there are batteries that will power the site for 2 to 4 hours. If power is still out, a generator may be brought on site. Access: Access will be on the existing road from Quiet Rain to the easement. Access to the site is granted to AT&T by both WAPA and the landlord. A legal definition of the access is an exhibit to these agreements and is recorded. Noise: 2 AC units are required. They will be ground mounted on the eastern side of the shelter that is below grade. Both units do not run at the same time, but alternate. The tonnage is 4, which is comparable to the units installed in themajority of homes in the immediate area. Drainage: A drainage detailed plan will be submitted with the building permit application. Interference with satellite dishes, appliances, etc.:The proposed facility will not create interference with home electronic equipment. AT&T uses frequencies that are licensed and regulated by the FCC (Transmit 1930-1945 MHz and receive 1850-1865MHz). The FCC requires that all radio signals remain within these boundaries to ensure that no interference problems result. Environmental Assessment: A preliminary NEPA checklist is done for every primary site candidate. Full environmental assessments are not ordered until a site has received zoning approval but prior to the building permit being issued. In this case, since we are collocating on a WAPA pole, an assessment was prepared by ATC Associates, Inc. and has been forwarded to the Denver office of WAPA for distribution and review by state and federal entities. WAPA will be handling all contact and coordination with other federal'agencies such as Fish and Wildlife. The complete assessment is anticipated in the month of June. Construction on the site will not commence until all assessments are complete and approved. Providers Plan: AT&T has submitted a plan to the Town and it is on file. Why this pole? Provided the necessary height and location as required by RF engineers. Provided a location for equipment within a short distance from the base of the pole. Provided an area for equipment location that had been previously disturbed. Provided area where the shelter would be constructed to blend into the surrounds. Coverage maps of the existing network and the coverage of the proposed site have been provided. Visibility: In response to concerns voiced at the first meeting, stakes were placed at the corners of the proposed equipment structure to demonstrate location and finished height. Comments during the second on-site meeting directed a revision to lower the facility. Revised site plans reflect the structure at a finished height 16" less than the original design. In addition, revisions to the landscape plan were initiated to create an opaque vegetative screen from both the views looking west to the easement and looking east from Quiet Rain. STANDARDS FOR COMMUNICATION FACILITIES: GENERAL REQUIREMENTS All general requirements for communication facilities have been met. • Stealth application - the antenna will be concealed within a "can' and will appear to be continuation of the utility pole. • The ground equipment will mirror the architectural design and use of materials of the adjacent entrance monuments, preserving the character of the surrounding neighborhood. The equipment will be completely screened by the structure. Elevations and renderings of the ground equipment shelter are attached. • All setbacks and height requirements have been met. • Air conditioning units will be enclosed by a wall. • AT&T will be responsible to maintain the structure. The Honey Bee Ridge Association will be responsible for maintaining the surrounding landscaping. • No new road construction will be required for the site. TIER 1 MINOR COMMUNCIATION FACILITY CRITERIA The criteria for a Tier 1 Minor Facility has been met as outlined below: The proposed AWS facility will be located on a replaced utility pole. a. A replacement utility pole will closely resemble the original utility pole. b. The height of the replaced utility poles will not add more than 20% to the original height and will not exceed 80'. c. The replaced utility pole's diameter will not be increased by more than 60%. ATTACHMENTS: • Site Plan and Elevations Native Plant Inventory& Revegetation Plan Renderings of Ground Equipment (Shelter Design) Aerial site photograph Site Photographs and Photo Simulations RF Coverage Maps: Existing coverage Proposed site coverage Coverage with proposed site added Manufacturer's specification for Stealth 16" antenna HOA Architectural Approval Letters WAPA Letter of Acknowledgment Environmental Assessment (Status) FCC Letter of Compliance/NIER Emissions FAA Notification Area Map, Parcel Map Detail, and Tax Sheet Labels for 300' notification Note: AT&T Wireless PCS Provider's Plan is on file Proposed AT&T Wireless Facility TU 48 — 1 Honey Bee RidgeMlapa Environmental Assessment An Environmental Assessment has being prepared by: ATC Associates, Inc. 1625 West University Drive, Suite 122 Tempe, Arizona 85281 The report has been forwarded to the Denver office of WAPA for distribution and review by state and federal agencies. WAPA has requested that they be the sole contact for all correspondence with state or federal agencies. Final approvals are anticipated by June 30, 2001. i,,, illr. - •w 4 9 k- —, ,. .. . ., .... y\�a .— Y 1 c) s ' 2' -;.,,j, i (1,i, ` � �` �� _tr 11 I _ — � i . Pl" ,til ��^ •,�.1=1Et // '� A •1 „DRi.err- D , - �� . . .-1 ilml6! -'-I1=111 � . atom 1� .. cc= I ) - - s 5IA 1 t=`i D. J Eti \ 8 ...- ..........--...............,... .1 .1 kb, it. '`7' 0 e \ g § :,-)p ....,- I\ QQ p WW v f) 'Up Z =l=.u- v e u 6 p'' ‘ 24 ( ._-, . . � 1 ,,,:.„,,,,,-,,I - r � otilt; Th• \g OWO WW 1,11. \ Z2 :56 a I/ ' Vt."1 - <J .x.- N Z c :t \i'V I w � 7 `i. " ) — ,r — ! \ 4.,... , l' ti, 1 \ �_ \ 1\.- .!il • t "f .i MI . k ..s. ,.... . . • ,so. ,. .c„, i•rn,„; , •.. ... , . ,-\\ ,.0..,.... —___ _ .9 111 .1'- --- ---1 I ���� 1 - l i1 ,��_, ,0, ,, ,, - . rialr-,,,,,rATE 41) 0 ,..11N9,i111- A, - il •6 Ii'I t H ` 1100: 4,0fr 'I . l! l'I' I � i. _ / ..I V1 1 Ps- W -- CC 7, ' ,A.%......111,16-,,,iir---.. j i , fit 0 1 -09),Iir'S .. , i . I i\\,: ' �, aI1 1 , 0 4111111' el - !. I Liii ell Y J 1 : •r )Ir-i ,_, Z Oil Ilfg• i: . A 1 ,....._. , • iinffirdrigt.MA/ 1140,Iiiiilp. iiii pill -, \ S INaa1a..• -r i • II MI _ ... _ U •.,:,...ii i •I i 'ill 11 lilt:till!1 t '�r rpt � :,�,i ii'` : I Itilil �� I . ,,,s1 . 1 t_3 10 i 1I:� \ W OZ '� O 1 ���e ,,,L.-, W • ._r c, W 30�� ems...- `_ \, O U • to ZZ c �� '`t ----. Q'• W 1/1ar4 O IIfc �� 1 It.1 W W 1't �it li1 E 'h z 16 l'' ''' ' 1:-.7.:::: lit 41 -o' >na: I it -7, t lir ) 11,'1141 it . ‘ -\'\. !.'.:;t•-.1 1 ( *r_ ' lis'-,1;.. ;. . F . *. \ - . • 43.1,1,i, 4,i, ., S-1Th R 4111 N l "�� 1 W .fl; - - -Lally, Ei-4 , , . ..,..,._.A.i ), ,Yfll � i ' i;11..,1,1 Ciml' `i i_i�i f' . . 1,,,s t 14 ' • - f • iirir .1 I�It? I • S ` r ir ,'It 3 ' Lit 1 1 11a� -� 7 ifi'i(' 1 I 1 i a v, ii - .,,,_,&1�,+;' El', i, .'--4,. 1 1 %,:„ sf 1 I • ,V1,:t,„‘ " .. i -• � W 1 ri 1 1 i ,E ( I 8 IP1 3.-- i 5 x I ► :• 1. li 1 °I, i i Who i '� I\ 1 1 1 = �- 5 .1,' J 1 .. !� 1 ;fi: 1 I � � . I I I 0 0 - cf) ,..\ V i !,' i I,- ----- .-----1j i if !.0 • i o _ _, -'-. .3 -. •,,•-•:. / c. ..4k 41; P, -.%-:: , .\., 7..-_,--,.-_-_ '....1 --- -41 0 / '. ‘\\°\\+Iiielt14 ---—:':w.' \ kt , . 1 7) ,,, ,, \ *5 _i il // r 1 r t��i, ir , . ,.+ p z U fm f it - / V+ iV ' " ) - • - \ ,1? \ ;' .iii:i.,. . r, •1.1.1.- ,,, ...,, :.:1'8 :F ._c, c,;','‘ 31 53 ,' ;,-.r,/ d r.: A... . ,o-,' ' ,/,., 01' \- CC * 4111 I I At,,,":". tif t...‘ :8 1 §e, / .,... oi.1,,,,t,r , .‘ , / 8 9. LaE,',.., tp, t i \ w►- L > K O 1 *is— ti r; ` },s df 3 v / 412 U'S < 7-1110$11114\ tt ` �O � z 3 !! / maw `�`� � ' i����\ i� 1 it 6 fi_ { O v . i I.4A .:-,•, / -;.`ckj g s-voi 4146 -,,,-, v . 0 ,L4.7,-, a Z Z qi--41totik '..' iaTh- dc4'1! -9 1, 2) i . :its. 141'4, .�'I� (i �It' ,4 - - ' ..s-LIQ; �_��i�=�I• w -' _:ul!-' _ al��Mit- 'u'In-fi -L��31 -YID' _ ! ,,,,, -,,,......,-_ ' 40._ ., .."- • • \ ri .e-Ati , g . ,,,! \-..r, ',. ,, -,,, II .0 . . ,1 . ,., • \; ti,-, • • ..c 0i '':).,-- i: i )1() 4 1>-i '' '''\1 \ f.. t- ''rib'i , A • N' N -,,.. l iiii,‘ __ _,.....-- I \.'' i' 14b ) '. fr OH, •� / V 7--- `— . v2 4 t 'j I D i- e T-t\'` . ' - P '` .,' ,' t W 1 ,_ 41 ' .r Sdit: . , . . ' ,, N I :r).P; :t 1 5r- �1 , i 1 ,) v.,, ‘‘‘, } I v,�,„. , ,/'I5 7...,,‘• E t'Li.i -.....--, 4 i sir . - �s�v,�s o W ����' I `Z fyyj 1 .. _, . • ))) . ,. , . m W 1 6-1)‘ . „, ' i ) Pa -.) 1 jv.,, t' 1 W . it is t: ,- : l i . )/' . /) i F ,•yr-L 1 v I., u c)/11 '' I <)? 1 f) • :,-. 4• i.,) - iii • 1 •_ 1 • W t;„ A 'F RHs, 1 z ;, �. '!"� _ �L 1 lg A-- t - iii II a , )) . . il iv .. W •v6 I 1 c) ow A i , • i. I MI° I \ ,3f i , cn , p - ,n,1 1 1--• ' 13 sal. li ' 11 ` , -0 , . W It ', (.1„714;,,,,,t1.,•iffrfi i i it I I . .1 -W v , ,, , o'' 0, .r,-., E,-, L I Z tNi •- 11111 --7;.=..,0 7 , R 4.#... ""i.107`" 1 ? ,1' d 7111 • rgai ,e- \qt , , 0 ;,9- ' t e __ L`3-PS -- M ., t 0 t.f) 'II 1.1 • . OC� N i I 7:- Z 1,h ,..,, ,, . a Q 4 � , ,i :L__,_. ', d ii: ,.meol ,�f ,• ii ri ,c:c -- :•„, -.K- =--�_1111``2/1 I L z ,i..,, W I I —...-.11:4116,...,.., _ , r: I� - \ N,it .moi r:- i �- � il CC 0 i�Prlll� •'4- -t u 4V.., 1 �)•oi .. h�U y-may '�I # .%n I ` g I.._ c., ,....„. 1 il j 41-r-----/\.1\\A .4,s-, i) --1'.".. - - " -/ ' ‘i 11 . . - . W 16 s ...__a— t. Z:',;.-'; t -'',, •, . 'XI.t 1 \ , \jai • , 1 i ;l�1••., 14 '••., ; • kl:It 4 ! !IF/ ,.. --.... ,,*„.z..1., . f\. • / - - .... .tri ...0,:rdr4c4 . . ,� ' T---- ,'-' c' Aim, / . • )?\ J.•WIT" i '# j, ti \I - .,_________ . g 4141r4• 41 '' ►',it —141111.4-°Lr ,1 1 0 p , , I I .XPi i t `` fi W ' U riii.'.;.1 . c IliM :---, i---- i -- - Mk' - • libigagattill" hiressamadmiLlii,%*4 NOUN-JO-1�03 Mild��of 2i3�3a'NotSr�X3,s J Figgilrlir1'�,l-NOS. �eo .9 - 1� ' . 1,NtaNv XNdINn/M DU 2f3M0d VdVM 9NUSD 3.9l/fl 0l SS ll hi'. i 41464 111 1;11;11-_ i• illt- I 17 L& l l�-- �� � , v ihritivilt_ ,I �I ihirtko oei- c) w, Ittl tishiiii„ititiv� ,_ ,, E L-_-3i 1► --1 j vlitiPON" ll.:A— I1i FiNglillitelor '11431rittillj.ll j I ri thilligia Ili 1 ‹N fir —441111 CO 71 .1-- ililitill[114111 41 •' rtali kr,- W C V r� til!alai:•-mule rt-1,ill itij11711.1sttl 01 > F -INT,10'..4 jog (,. Ili t. ,,,,i, ...... ' 111-ereit' y . ,,, 6 I III a I4g ler 4 ^ �N o , 6 8W > 0 '-3 Z. - \ svc w .`: 1111:11*C ,< , w C m< E5. _ Li ! o 1111P 1�xz%S,s1Zs \,� z . — Nc:T \ \'‘e) F Fgilt!, , .,., ----z 4.. i t ita, O..d Y ,♦ t` 'tPr� 1 w etitIlli UWC� DO UQ 9Z • �� �� )) Gclp )111k, 2,-,\,1 I aa VU 0 W i U C7 X Z x Z W U= iiii : ; �,0 l-,9 lin- � ��W iiii v,o� r iiii ec L., li ro.l W D O C 2 .. // ... •. et -7.?. Y C Nw OY- 1 W ill., Oc c, LSm gm I L O i Z (e" ' . 0, \\\\'•, v, 7101/1t Proposed AT&T Wireless Facility TU 48 -- I Honey Bee RidgelWapa NIER EMISSIONS/FCC LIMITS AT&T Wireless PCS facilities: Transmit 1930 -- 1945 MHz Receive 1850 — 18 65 MHz ERP is 100 Watts Letter from AT&T Wireless RF engineer attached demonstrating NIER emissions for the proposed facility are within the limits set by the FCC. AT&T AT&T Wireless Services Suite 1100 2398 E.Camelback Rd. Phoenix,AZ 85016 June 20, 2000 To the Town of Oro Valley, This statement is to confirm the proposed AT&T Wireless Services site TU-48 meets all FCC MPE requirements: Power density is calculated at 536.58 uW/cm2 at base of the pole. This level is 53.66% of the FCC limit for uncontrolled environments, or 1.86 times lower than the FCC limit. The composite power is calculated at 1500 Watts. The FCC limits for uncontrolled environments are: Bottom of antennas at no less than 39 feet. Composite power output of less than 2000 Watts. Meeting the above requirements also means that this site is exempt from routine RF exposure analysis by the FCC. Robert Hammersmark AT&T Wireless Services / Arizona RF Engineer USA PROUD PARTNER VD Cel Recycled Paper Proposed AT&T Wireless Facility TU 48 -- 1 Honey Bee Ridge/Wapa FAA (determined by FCC's Landing Facility Slope Calculation) RESULTS A routine check of the coordinates, heights, and structure type you provided indicates whether this structure does or does not require registration. Any "fail slope" result means that your structure requiresFAA notification and FCC registration. If all results are "pass slope", this means that the structure does not require registration, based on the information you provided_ WARNING: Because the airport database we use is updated periodically, it does not take into account the most recent airport construction, nor does it include proposed airports. You still must resister with the FCC if your structure is located near one of these airports or if the FAA specifically asks you to register - even i l you "pass slope" in all instances. Note: Use your Browser's print function to print your•I_owAir results THE INITIAL INFORMATION ENTERED: I LLItutlc ( V'-.i-:ill•S1.1.11Cliii,. t LLIIt SirilUii I Li alit t L t it tuli 's!)tL.(Iiiv-"t~yp : rStructure s slot recitiiire reg[ iraticou_ The struct•ure meets the 6.10-meter(2O foot)Rule criteria FAA notification is not necessary if the antenna structure is a building and the mounted antenna does not increase the overall height of the building by more than 20 feet. The FCC has determined that structures originally built for purposes other than exclusively supporting antennas are to be considered buildings and not antenna structures. This means water towers, grain silos, utility poles, and flagpoles are considered buildings for the purpose of filing FAA notifications. It should be noted that the 20 foot exemption does not apply if antennas are located at a specified airport. AT&T Wireless PCS will obtain ASRN's (Antenna Structure Registration Number) only for facilities that require notification for FAA. The proposed site at Honey Bee Ridge will not require FAA notification. -411. Department of Energy Western Area Power Administration Desert Southwest Customer Service Region s. P.0_ Box 6457 Phoenix, AZ 85005-6457 • AUG -1 2004 LETTER OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Town of Oro Valley Development 11000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley, AZ g5737 S "ect: Proposed AT&T Wireless Facility ' Ridge Common Area of The Estates at Honey Bee l g Dear Sir or Madam: Please accept this letter as acknowledgement ement that Agreement No. 2000 CSO-35001, Master Lease Agreement, been has executed between Western Area Power Administration and AT&T Wireless less Services. Per the Ageement, a site-specific exhibit is under negotiation for the above referenced proposed facility site_ S . cerely, . •thorny H. Montoya sistant Regional Manager For Power Marketing Date: 8 — tOO Cc, Ms.Mary Oretta Manager, Contracts And Energy Services Western Area Power Administration Mr. Jim Hartzell Electrical Engineer Western Area Power Adminisaation TOTNL P.01 VISTOSO COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION c/o Lewis Management Resources, Inc. 180 W. Magee Road, Suite 134 Tucson, AZ 85704-6680 tel. no. (520) 742-5674 fax no. (520) 742-1523 July 14, 2000 Ms. Martha K u e n hold TynanGroup, Inc_ I E. Desert Sky Club, Number 2 Oro Valley, AZ 85737 RE AT&T Wireless Services Facility, Estates at Honey Bee Ridge Dear Ms. Kuenhold: Thank you for your cooperation in submitting plans for the above-referenced proposed installation within the WAPA easement in the Rancho Vistoso Community (adjacent to The Estates at Honey Bee Ridge), Please be advised that the Vistoso Community Association's Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee has reviewed the plan and approved it, as submitted_ You may expect a letter from The Estates at Honey Bee Ridge's Design Review Committee to be forthcoming. If we may provide you with further assistance, please contact me. Sincerely, "I‘i 4 1/1"/ Mark Lewis Lewis Management Resources, Inc. for the Vistoso Community Association :nt By: LEWIS MANAGEMENT; 5207421523; 7-Aug-00 11 :52; Page 2/2 THE ES TA TES AT HONEY BEE RIDGE HOMEOWNERS A SS OCIA TION Lewis Management Resources, Inc_ 180 W. Magee Road#134 Tucson, AZ 85704-6680 Tel. no. (520) 742-5674 Fax no. (620) 742-1523 August 1, 2000 Ms. Martha Kuenhold Tynan C roup VIA FACSIMILE Communications Facility—The Estates at Honey Bee RictgeNVAPA Trail Dear Ms. Kuenhoki: Thankou for allowing the Estates at Honey Bee Ridge Design Review Committee the opportunity to you in the WAPA trail. review plans to collocate a new communications facility on an existing utility adjacent to out community_ Please be advised that the following conditions will be applicable: 1. A landscape plan must be submitted for review. Said plan shall be consistent with landscape treatments implemented on private properties and within entry-way features of high-end communities, such as Honey Bee Ridge. 2. The screen wall on the west side of your site must match in height the screen wall at the main entrance to The Estates at Honey Bee Ridge_ 3. The south elevation of the equipment shelter must be extended to cover the 10 inch roof extension_ 4_ The CMU wall on the east side of the facility must be painted to match the Estates al Honey Bee Ridge entry features. 5. The lease on the subject property will not be negotiated until such time as the Vistaso Community Association's Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee has approved the request for architectural approval. Subject to the conditions listed herein, your request for the subject communications facility within the WAPA easement is approved. Sincerely. Shirley J. Hope. Manager Lewis Management Resources.inc_ For the Honey Bee Ridge Homeowners Association SJH:tf AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES PROPOSED FACILITY NEIGHBORHOOD 13 — PARCEL A HONEY BEE RIDGE ASSOCIATION — COMMON AREA A 4f f 72 f •\ J 4 61 1 eo k 71 My-s>�c ,., 69 N,� rw %'t \ Alt I \ I .t —..L. — 4, . V 4• e t a - ;,•,tat Ni �7,i17 - C -`V t inter 106 t .'r..ft, ,� e+{ 70 y CD ,., , 4 • - 'i(iiiii 44-isee i .46 79 :5,ir ; 4. I i EZ Z ' �5♦ 106o; \ '? z L8.?.r I 43. • ,iQ s`7'`a'1 ; yam, . ,........ .,.civ, --.., , ......., _ --t • 73 011) ... .© 78 4 •- ; k 0 4400.0 2 ‘,...a 77 :1 It 44022e • . t iit..000*, .'di 82 4. ,..-7.N., .7,..,0-10 i C) (/) ' g 75''1‘4. '1-"'it: 0 -- / l'.* e roe- 6) 1 .... ...,,,,,,,,- 4; _ .. 4.1ii , , ..-iy ,.:Z, . r4. _.c t ` t Jarmo :7. 1' ., t . , 2ri .4i 74704.# su k, ' • .;1` 76 a \ _ Z ThThraf4 fil)Danl. 4., sk . $ �, r ,. 22 l'au, 0 craw." I' is v. i ,.,,,,,,. ,,, C1? \\\ bir'P-6 ?4, , IP,s, 4;4, 4) ,, C 0 --- - 24 c - 474: 't.% t -, 4,0%..0019 i r- (1,3A1': :‘41101 .1e.lit:1.4 r /I 11 '‘'Y. - 4a..n.r a . 1 11 i • 112 4, • ' ►.a. :: • :!!�; ,. • 85 _. sr,.,..tuf 411 \ 410, $‘ •� t f a r,....,„_4 7-* ,0.3.. ,„,,,,„ 465co- f,l, . to It,,.. -,....i, .,o, _A.1,.. .... ',..,4,-4 ,10,.... , h.....„, . ..... 2., ..„,..,„,,,4,-.0-.. - . A89 51 J71�! 1. S 032r it• pt4Ye- 'r 114 28 S ;if... ` s .5041 ""'�► �. 86 i ildlf�d t_� ir.. .. - s� c. i L ?t lY it tl +,� . 42 ' 44R ilito z.,., sovre-w.ord,t Atas 43 0 „if L. ,s:or 1g ? * 4 1 ` _ _ .•Jr �..i4-r _ • -%:\0 7 4% , ,..'4 d L -. QQ 9 Z 17i s . sig) A tilii) ?)8 t� ss: •� 17.IIRs,/40 0.'tt 'a\•, 3 s -\\\\‘N1/4\...1\ LOT D1 M .,,s- :< ,øt s 4-,,� "� 's►� ;i% vow epfif 4.2S 11.4 Ilist S:....„4„.: rr ii.clhet , ... t .!A .000 ir\r X •I ievorfte 40. : • Tz ,........... . , ., -,,,,,R-4,1 ,,,,,,ci-,..°.':e:,:0°:0 .,... ..., :.,..# / ‘ 284. 1 4- * tat NSP � �� �-.� � +c i "�+ } 723 278 '2,. (40 '�� �, 1qtr.;• '14.N►. z-..4E I F-A--ce 1 ,--#.‘,..,,, if, . ,;.„,,-.0 Gl,„..., . -o...... , ) ..... . .... -4 3/96 1 , ' ON .,e .ZD / 1 `t -,,k, �,�''P >'� Ns, .03.4/ ., ;GO c // 1 \ 1--N f 0 , . Lc D d j �,1 Q \X r r21 �'w \ lit r • 122 Ta dt7:,.i4. I 7 25 i AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES PROPOSED FACILITY AREA M A P HONEY BEE RIDGEASSOCIATIONCOMMONAREAA HONEY BEE RIDGE COMMON AREA WAPA EASEMENT SUN CITY COMMON AREA WAPA POLE \ , _____.... _______________:_____i. ••<>/osi4N5i01.>' / - x ?:3,0.>',. ••• # At••i<-3:$::::;$::*.4 e. # .>-•••••••••11; 4.444.04 4 *.$4° a Iv. AP.**If 4. • , • N. . ...ft.,. 41,,, . 111 \642:paig Nif ,,„*.. .:47:14" . ... .._ .__ ._ __ __. : , 1 ::: 441446 4 AO 14 ing A , s .." 4 •:,.1.!���j��1 esu •♦ ♦♦ItW 4 t is.1,--liege,. u ... --# • .to.$s : . , . •::���i�♦ia ��fs•* •, •lea .0110/1 s. - ♦V •f' •i I A& . ,4 mar A Iro sot"1 VC! 'Att,*,,, • 13;4419":41 !- :1-.,- - . .),.„„_, ler 011. •.,,!,_„:i *- duo ire- ii 0:::: . ..-Aft i : ofr.,0a , 1111114\4 VI al ��1�.�• r yt a* "krj %in iw Iii i• lI'� 11. :i•� - 0 .KI I 111W.# VCR igifri^... wp •# y to. 111111(►! ♦ �� •• 41'�i "-' : 4 •h �.• •i rit xlip,4 • ♦ ♦ • • •iN ,'1•* h o 4°,%;7:,oi, i:. IN VII ba r1tt/� •icedi SS♦ �' 01441 � it/ ./IV i a:III 8 i 1 31 r,•, ► �.•..,•. •... I&j 11 •fl amu. ��IOW11111 VW 11111;1 a %IC IA■■ �� IBM :a IBMsi0 4=lel . rt11 ,r„� off lea r r• li1/n/• •i moi' • ' fff"it iesatss s ►_ I_•♦ •� ha• r111 -_ , • 411 ib • do ♦ I soi .... il •r -. ..1 st cr):1 kik gli,_ , 4 'V. 4', ' S\a S*"2''''' "sri I(1 0101#01 I -- 1 . I. I./ lied v. VII IASmillerik�► ♦ moi• i • q&v ��t ili_s_teivedill PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA oiRDuR 4.0001_6'00 Area Code 1012 Tax Rate 16 .65790 Printed 02/03/2000 08 :39 Parcel Number 219-2028402 Docket Book 10352 Page 808 Date 08/06/96 itus Addr Owners Name ESTATES AT HONEY BEE RIDGE ASSOCIATION Mailing Addr ATTN: LEWIS MANAGEMENT RESOURCES INC MARK LEWIS 6700 N ORACLE RD SUITE 100 TUCSON, AZ 85704 Section 13* Township 11S Range 13E Book 48 Page 61 Block Lot (s) - Legal ESTATES AT HONEY BEE RIDGE COMMON AREA A OPEN SPACE AP99 00 *** 1999 TAXES UPDATED THRU 01/10/00 Value Ratio Land 500 . 00 10 . 0% Improvement 0 . 00 0 . 0% Full Cash Value Exemption Net Assessed Land and Impr 500 .00 0 . 00 0 . 00 Personal prop 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 Limited 497 .00 0 . 00 0 .00 1999 TOTAL TAX 7 .44 FIRST HALF INTEREST SECOND HALF INTEREST TOTAL DUE 0 .00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 .00 0 . 00 No Liability BACK TAX INFORMATION UPDATED THRU 01/10/00 CP NO. /TYPE SALE DATE YEAR TAXES DUE INT. DUE AMOUNT DUE OLD PCL ** NO DELA TAXES DUE FOR THIS PARCEL ** UPDATED THRU DATES: ASSESSMENTS RESOLUTIONS CITY OF TUCSON 01/12/2000 01/09/2000 ORO VALLEY 01/17/2000 01/17/2000 PIMA COUNTY 01/17/2000 01/17/2000 *** NO ASSESSMENTS *** *** NO RESOLUTIONS *** *** NO SOLD ASSESSMENTS *** „. . . . Tv u ITnanGrocii) Real Estate Development Services AT&T Wireless Services,. Proposed Facility , ,,. .,.. ,. ,......,. ,......,. , , , ... ....,, , „„.... - .• -,:--.., , , ,„ ,, ,...„ „,,,, „.,: . ,, ...r„.,„.•-,.. ',„,. .,, . -., ,, .„,„, .,, ,, ,„.:•,,„.„...., ,,,,,,„,, .----- ..,.---• , , ,,,,„„---,' 0 , , , ._ _ , 2,c,','':•,,, ‘''..',.,=', ---..- ' ''''' ' , . ,..,„... ,.,. . '.131t ., ,.. ' ---•- -• -it•-..e7.-At' .7.' ,,, ,, ., .• . .., , •. . . r ,•„. 4, t, .1 ' ' *- : ''... .7 ,:.,i',,'„''',-:: ;.' .....0,,m....., ., ,-,,,,,. \ ,, P . ‘ , . ..-, , , ,, .-.74,445,, 7 , -,,,,,,44004**4tbiwt- '1, '' *' ' 3 • ' '''''' '' '. , • ' ,',..k :. . , -.4,, RANCHO VISTOSO IP _ il,' Proposed AT&T Wireless Facility iii 1 TU 48 � 1 Honey Bee Ridge/Wapa m _ R , ),, - . , -, -,,,,$4,:„;.,.... .,..„,- -1,,,,0,-, .. w r.'.• . . .•. .. . , .. w •4 ., 4 • -,- I-s I . ...- - . ,--. • .„ w.„4,,,,,re � . a Y �.a • '•���' . . �}. r ‘'t, L =ify M9rw+“'�«iT �'.' �fM _. r-.:',',*.--4 iBV- S. ' tey ,_ :, _.,^ : id... �' - . _ - � } ma, i ` Honey Bee Ridge entrance monument(design duplicated in shelter architecture) mil, :: ,,,,, ,, ..., ,,,,,,:,.,-,_ .4n. . 4 �� a,, V - i' i I' 'N\-,.414 ',. IR. I. f. - t �.. is ., , 7 ;.: i y / Ilk '-' '-— ' ' "—. ' } i t t°•G ' _ .?4. ' } .M M.. ' ott.t z i ' ^; a ?v s. + : ^14„,____,..7.7.--s°' a tis,___ : .,,,,..„.., i !",.;,,_•,-.1.: ;4,546,4,v4Sli,;;, } .a 1 ” c - -- --'--- --—r' i 7,,,..7,' '..-..:---f- .,„ „ e. 1 f ~ '''- .....*r....." "... *1411F,,::''.1'11/111;'11,:•,.61,Lti:14..,..,..... ;I.; ',.t.''''; '''''':‘4.;":3:::i'll'O'k..,* ”. ...'''''''''." . _ - "`' s . T. .16. , ' .'' . ii 1' ', T . , .',. .... ,...,,, Aflilir J ' .— ''' [... ipl. ; , ; — , .- , ' * ," 41111UW — '''''- -- ' ''.'01.. : ' ' .itr "Ps - a y .,* . k ` --1 .... ........... _ 3., r _ } Six^' • c aa00__ r »"ice ` r _' „': '' .,xr."'S i Detail of entrance monument ,CPro & iii 48 ® 1osed HoneATTy wireless dee Rid elFacwa a t P'; i qhs j a a rrn t /44, i y`>-{Y.S to y.e >M v WRQ~ i..� lam,,f..et. ,A ' +,,i 1 E�, t.r t. ,t k ..5 u .-, 4 ! {F r5i'>�' : +.,,, AP s'- - � 1 .::,,,,,J.:4;,, � .^"+�.t,� r a.F y "�.." •.Nv y S n ,... :-.'1.-: a k� ♦�f- W..�� #- ,-;,-,4.4,-,...,f, Mt � :wa� ,A -. _ •.- . ,. � W ,dP � „� � ..yam ...7,4.7-,-..- - . d�" �� L c r'e ,~ � .-. r r �f� „,i,..,,,- "�' -a"i..0; w: ,1 �. ±G,i'w;-:"'. •es�f' r .7. _ 'r • ... U•1• � �F !.. - . T jr Y•'��"•r r .a»A.„,,,,,,,,.-- "� � :.f .IL. • 11► •.L. s a ,�.`., `y*,_ ..e . {. .. n ,y 11.:.,..4:„;,.z,----,1-' :'.f' �r .t' 'S ti .. _ ..' :! • y'mow`• � k .. tri. .; ..--'411 ,-. _ Y , + W . y''���tr•e4#, � ,....,,,,,.._.'-7- "'�t�'�.r��,•r,�r, p. ., — y 4 �� ' • ,.:ul���� ^�. *I.,,,7- . �e""�, t w•- _ e `3'RR"7^�¢� 5.�•r..., f "o• P '�' _.,,t r„ a^ .`� a'M 0 -- - -- • '' -• View looking north a"r ', +} i to vi M £ _S ` ;S t t r5;.-F,.. c E« y.r. rg. xn.-.5) F r 1 Q.`'M;i R, r3Fj,".'.)'f W r "+ 5 r E h a% y �M.:"'40'..!--,- '40 t f? , �'�}'`,�y'*';< `F':`'k 1.:.; x,a . - 3,,,. s�-; 2 i 8:r ,.i x” .,,,srK a �w •40,,,A.14#.04$4.,....., .... .-1,.,—;,-''-','-!,:-.1-''' ...A y,.7�iyC— § .� t°t°�:4e*{fir -- .x-',. .,• ,t ' yam. i -. .; ...<s ti a.'` -' yr ,MIK' ., #.. w n., ri te�"at 6 M1. .' z "fn ,.SIS'�1 V P ti• � ` b * � 9 s+ ,,..—.' 'pb,,KR +irlfll�.� r .,0111111 1 w: ' ').'.1"i'; -4000t -. '' "'—'- ' C ••• 9 View looking south . As :,,:,.:,,,, :_, , :,...:.4.,,:.:...,,,,,, .,,,,..,..r.r;r.„.....,,. :.,,.,.._,:it:::ez.....,7:,.,,,,,,,,,,,„,s,,,;,4.t..,.....:,...,.."1,....,...,, r ,t...,"......::.,.,,,,..r.,,..i.::.::::,.......,c..,,i,:.:..._ .. o,.,:.,„IL. ,,,,,,.„,,,,... ok,.,,.,,,. .:.4..:..,.„.......,,,..,.,...,:‘,...,:0.,,:..,t.:,,.,,,,.,i,,,,,fP:.iH„:,,,,.,r.,.,,4',.:,fo,.,'.,:..,',I,I',:.',,.,,,„.:,:''',',..L'''.r(i;.,:.:','i.'':'ps.,;;.-,::''c'•4l.,,,,:'.,,., - -,iv•:,-..,,, .• .:'",,,•i ,,:,-,..,.,ir: , . - '.•..,-,--41.- . , ....,..i. ., eta ,...,i.....,-..Pi.;;kj::-..,..„.,-..r.' ,40,.. 7 7,2 ,,,,.,..g.,,..,-4,,,„, r ,, ..•tr, ',,,..,. r ...,,,it.",,' .,. r:4 ,11,,, ..,,,,,,:k„,k., ..., ,.. , r•'.4 r•''. "'VC''''''' ''••71': '.;:::::•••••:4 ..,...A.111,, .. --...'• ..,:. ,. -fr ,. . t: ,,,. .;-.•iz,,.A ,, ,, , . ..../'-•. %b..*•. •=i4.. :,...' . •r- - 'i,„,,,,,•:••:.-••.•.-744"...:4. r•,-?:A-I'''''.:.:',''''...',.-Z' '' " •',.-."' .71tp,r'#',iit., - .--,' itt, I et. t.--, _ it.,,,,....„._.,, .,,ligiti,.,,..._.-. .. ,• :.., ••.,..„;„4„...,...,, „.-•.„. • Itiiite ,..k. .•: -,. .. •• ',.•••••• : -„,,..„. • _ ...,. -.A_.,.. ,... ••,:?,, ..f.:' •''..,,,h'.4*. 7/ ...:.' „.--',1,... ,-,'- ,.: : ' ' 110. .7,-,--.I ' * • ' '''.' lite lk• '''''''. - ' A::„''' •,. ;;,•...'•''-.,. - '-11' __.,,..- . :-.1'4'7. -', .',....A'-..;,' ,-- .-,:70:''''.:....,4'..'''''2,,''''•.',,,t, '71,9V" - :,..in;.-•$.7.,,:ftk,r -1.,",:* ..' I.,I'llv"'....., '. ..... .'.-i:•••••''•-•:, .-- tr:*- •.,'.. '"' • .''' If' : .• r•• ' ' • ..ii .,,, . .. . , ,. ik ' ,,,, ..,-.4,..,,,,.,,,,:it,...,.. -:,41..., •,..:_... -,,- 1/477.7....,r:.:„.2... .1-%,, .. . ...'!,11,:.. .., it r:'''' • :' ., ,,,,,,c, -;-,.,:7,7*. ,;it...`!0:,••4.Ap...,:t.';.'ilk:. ., ,,,L",.. •-• . .-r.-..-.....i,"...:,..,ir iiPir:-4.'...,;;:',•'. -.._ .,ArL :,,t.): '.r.7,717 7. •,4t 'ir,:A.,-A...','..:.-.,..,..., .':,-,. ,. -1.4i, ,7...'.:4....' •-.),'. ..•.;,.....,,,,4.r ..-,.-.,: -.1-,-- • ,t..,,,.•,..-,:,---..,...00.,. ,..,.:-.r.,•1„1",;7:4„:-.4.44A. 7.7:..•-•.- , -. ' ....4„,_, ,-,,,,,:„...,-; • 4,,,,,, ,„,.,: - - .H,.: 4fik",,,iir * toi,•. • . 1.41...:,--..',.1- - '.;Pa. -,..-... -.• - .4. .",- -7" '4 • • `1.„,.„.... -,---;*.**.-..7%t';''..#;' •,;;',.t,',•,„•.' ..sai,,,.,'r.- 4'r,,,''_.,114t0e-,'""si r:• ; ..: •••r r;'.% • r :r". 'Vi ite•1•Pi: 4 ':' "..*.' • ' :',,--,,.,-:-,.,.;7.*'''''-,: -•iii'IP ft '1'. ' .**t. ). . • " itt ' 4 * • ••"'' ' •".. * • *. ' ''''sliti -'''a - ' 'IC''''''''''''. . ''''' ' • ",.. •,Ili _•.",...,:...- ' ,.. a*,.... ,.-,... ,:.,...,.. , ,„ .•*., ;,,, ,.•.,:.:_Ai., ',a,,.....,,,....„L 4*.4,,es. ,,,,,t. .it..,eiN • • . ,:,.....,... 4,, .. .,,,,i,. ,,.,,,,,,,- . tt ir ;......-,..•... ..,...,,,7 . , .......,...-.., ..,-;:,.-..,,,j4...,_,,, „..., -0,,„:t.„27.,,_,01,..;,Lii,,,,,,,,,.r....., ,.,7 :..„7.4...,.....,....,.::::*,,:-..•.:•::,;:,..„,:, .::.'7',-'(.:'-')'-': ,,r,t'l•V'' ,,,). --4'.-.'.',,,,,.D.-N.14-r 0* . • --,........2- -' ,-- -. :40'4,- ' . ; •:4'.•••'.r.. let 411t, •••., - 4 . . ::::•'•‘, atit',..jk ,• •- ,..•• A....j. 1. .,„.„.....,,,,..• - • ••, ,Nwt.,„,, ,•,•,.., •,,...„...,4,..,........,".:,,:...- • ,,„...... ••„,•,..?;•':,i.•••'•':''''''''''''"...ip'",.' 4,•, - .., , yip • ...‘'',4.•, ., **1-44,47,A...•,*arti.'••, .,,,, ,,, .I 0.,/i_„,..--„...r.,,,,,,,•:,,..„._,..,,,„,...4„,,f.:.....",,,.....-,•.•...'•: . .,,.::,. '....-....„..„:•..,,,, "4,-, ,, ,•.,.'", ...'.,,,,,,:z. r jiret., . ..g.',,..,, 17 •• , '...' .'r 2...; .*•••' ' r• • ,'' " .;10, ..41,1* ."' *:. • r-. ••r,,,,,,,,,,e r r.r..•.,'::•••/•",.•.,. ' • r -r•,•,...1.::'•'..° •4•'''• *",•"lik :•1•1'a• '•• r+1 '•• ".''•••:'Wr'i'r 1 : ••''; .fli,•.'r• "'r "r• r':"• ;•4, •-••r''''4;21.•• •• '' .'''.•''.•'''r '.. *'" . :''. r• "•,•••.": ••"••'';".Y''"r•'•'••':•:••••'''••:: • ::• :"1 .:r;•..•:•i',lea*'' .r ' : *lc•..: "7.?II': '.S'.'.' • '' thr''.'" •'" P.': : r r,.."'::::::'..'"1:''‘":. 1.. ' ,':r 7::'4,4,,''• ''..:10k.„`_',-2'.• ' ' :: ...,,,,,,''':',•,*:.,..;.-,, ,,q4k-;':r'''' ..,..,*-.--,::. ,..,'_'''.,' ' s•." ' .,','',.'.''...,''''''''' tVit 9° '" •''r ' J,.,•.-' ',.:-. 0. 4;!.. ..-:•,r7......;-• .„ _.. ',..,.. ,,.*.-*••AI,*1.4.-,i, ,iec'-..,.... ...•' ,..,,,,'...,;:,,i':?.'.i..)1,-.,s0,-i- 0,A,i3r;• .:**- '.'•.,..,„ ',,_:, 1,A,,,,,"`...,.. ,, f ''';II, 4,..11.'7' - .,.‘,.... "r. ''r. Ai* „0., -,,,•,-,,,•••- ,,,,,,, _,.•„:.7.-,,,.. ...,,,-,,,,,,.:.,, 0,,,:..:••.:-.‘, ,..itik,,,..• „ „ , •, ,,..., i, . . . * . , ., • . ' ,?.,-,,,...:.•'-''..,r 1 r r . 'r*r: •".• •• 1r ' :•:'.'• r• 'r:PP• ';‘•• .• • r •:•'''.. r'''''''• ''' ,,1:4:•.,.:-. •..'-''‘.4„,-:-.'.. :4,,..: ''.'::'.-. .:'...• - .' '- ''''.; -*-;'''' -4.''' - .';,:e',::•--- "- .i•.-••:...:•'''''),••,,e'..7.". -'1''-'* - - '-.'•.. r""I 1 ,•: ' ..•• •"'.'it MIMI! 0 ,.,,..:.. :.. ,,,,-. f...„....*"., I.,..i.,•*.- ... •,..i. , ., . . ' '• .,.,.-:,,,,..1...•.,,-,' ' , .,''",,,,,,,::. ' '.•,'k -..-'...,. 77:. • . i, r..„,-, ,•,. -Y.. •".i '' ' - •,,--' '1` • .r.'. , ., .- ,:./....- 4,,,-.' •' -,- . ''''' ,,:,--„,,,,,, ,fi:',it.„,,.,• ' _, 7;'4' 4.;,........,:',„...-•- -.• .....„1.,•-•-:.','--. :,,-, ,,ii,••-,,,-, ....,' ''.,,7- • •••;,....'.•'-;"-... ..,'.,,,,' ..7..,4,:,,. •'''.' ,0,... • ,.7 . "r;;Ik.•,,,,"'."'P P "". ..' ."r".•...7....,7•-.;..,.•,:,.,. .. •,.,,,.,..,...... ir.7..•'....:;.,..;-..-7- i'447'.''.'''''' '-'t- '....•. '.(I''''.'7.'-'''''.:. .r • r •'''T.1';': """* I:•'''•4;Zr,•••r"i,r.', 41,.:''' :,'.,;•a..Z.,.',..,•._::.,''.', _.,,,Z;4,,:"''6' ,;,.' ' --j... . . -,•.. ,,A,,,'•:.2!-..f-*--.1,„, . t,' .. '•,4,,.., 1._ . 4. 10." '.••• -.1‘).- ...•••''#• •'L.,•4- CI) titilliir r' ,,.,,.,•,..."••.:..,..'I'„%-A.r....--r . . ,.. . ,...,,,..,-.•..,::,,,,,,::,,,.., - ,,.„-,, '''...."• r 1,..;':.':•''r'• •X'4' •• •.."1.' I 4441.#,ia.•,''• '. ' .P'•''''...?•:".4.•••.''''.. r .....r.,r•r':::',:'''.'•.'.'''''''''''''•:,rr:•.::• .rjt'.r'P : '!rr!P"I',...**" 7.„,",.",:r•r''L r,2::.r,,:•-r''.•',,' ., r . limir '' •',...,'...•'..s'' . ' ,i.SV''''''''' '.....‘ •.*-.•.,.....: '''...t.-. .,,''-'.'•'. ____,, ,-.-. -:''._ .„.•..' .1 • .'.,-,*(,:',,-';'-':. 0 i 4ir i i,,.,... ,.,c4.-'•-•7.''''.,,,,,,,o',T,•;.,;?;,.-.:.•.:::,...,:,:,;:,':i',: i7,•,...,..-,:;.':4:',.;,1.,:,t;,,l':•:,',•:Ti...;::"',..,ri4;;',,,',::;:::.,.A-,,,:7'. r• ..::.....""4"'• "' ;I;'I.,. • .• ••••:':'''* '' 1r 'r"*"fil ,•.. • r '41 ".‘rP; ••:: ‘.• '•' <:' • "'w--.7 .H•:-•*'''"-..:.• ".:?... l:-. *:41.1,V1-4,',„:"02'.:Ir'''::'':..1-,i44i''''''47,,•:''..:-.,e.';'..,•:,;:,,;i:....-...7*.:::, ,.-,,,.4 ,,-.4ikit;, 40-tr„. ,,',..,. rt . 1)."-- - •• ',..-* . ,,,..,.....„-..---..!#-',.. -- 3 4....:,x•-•••.,.- ..,...r,,,,,:•.4,,,,:,:v14.,x-0.---....•••••.,,,,,4,2,1,41,44,-,),,,,,...1,•-•;::.•,,,,,,,,,::••••• - ----- , • lot ''''''''' '''''''' r" * •' liril ril‘A'‘'' ••r••.'"'' ' ''.'In•'‘. •ti.x„Al, ..,--,4';.:-,k'*:•,rN4,-'..,,.:.;;:.'--- . ..-......,,440,.:,',,,r7.,...,,,,-.:g.;:.:-,..!',-......,:-'---'.....,...-''_...f. ..- 7.1.--' -_-- . ,iks,---- .-:..*. -'. '..t% i,,,''-.*"':.• . -.•,',•*••• '• `1.114116,. irt ''.•- '•,.•' .• .' '-: r-e,•'.;ft.,,..!/.;r i.2:'--•••••'';':• :4;"•s;::-.:k.,,--!,,,f,..,•:•.;Ito,,.;:,,,f,":„.•••'•. • ..,,,•-- .,--.,- ,,,,;:„..Ir- ''-:.,.. ••iiiii'41,...,•,.. . ..i. .-,. •".'.:. •,-,'-:'4...-.' :-.-e:•"4 .!..101; -krir'•' ''• ••• ''';',..i.:!,,. ..•,1;,;''':.••,,;,;?,.":,.::•,...:....,..,.•:.....:.T.',1";;''..e,,.'W.J-r'''':',_......'„:1":7;"7.:;••:•,•,‘": .....,.,.,-.; , 2. '1',4.. .. ‘.,.•!7,,*,..ii,... '..;,....;,...:•:•• •••"' :.7.,,.1.., '... .--7,,,,e. ,,,..:„...P........,,,,.,. !:,?-r .-..• ,:..,-._.. .. :„,,,..„,...,-;:i.,;..!...r.':','.'t:,',':::.;44.:::'::;,,i,:',"'Pr:'..'..:,,,,,,,'.'•• •••44',,,,:•:•r . . •• r 1'4 1'• ." r:'ION..••er:.••••'-P":'.li'''''" ' .....,r• • r";P•'...'41," ''r.:" :* "".• '. . B , ••-,-,-"',.' --v'!t.P'..,..,..- ,i.#.;;;'''.-*'-„-,: -*).7 7s::;!... ,*:(.‘.1,.. ,.,.., ....--..,.:'i...•41Y,':'-•,.:-.:::-.'.47•,,,-.I,--''' '"''', --, '. .,,,..:„.::::,•:.,-,''* •;::'i::••••'•. •.9,-;:...''.,r.r'.1.'*: lfr••••••''''''''.;.••'''P•..7"' A.,:..' :..,.''i40. 4- r '•''''. ,' ,,,' .•:-*...,-,,,,,"'I'rr'77:, . , 4.4 ,....., .e'-.,,',...,,,,,,::.,.p',..;....t,..,-.\:::,,),:iii.:•,,.,4 -...,....„,...„..r„'..!..'.:.,,T-,..e.:,-,-:-.,-,:::-..-,:-.,::.:-..,:;-•:..,,... ,.' 144::.:4‘... ..fi:_:::-.,.,,, :.•:.,.., ..., ...' ., „.,,, wi,•,, ...A50;:::,,,':.,,,......:- •,.,,..? •-••.'-',,. ,;:..--,..,:-:••,-,.,•,...,,..- • ,. ..„..,...„.„..,:••, C ,.-.'"-;'''r r''''''''' , 4- r'•r'41 • "'.:••'. •:•:":"••...-'e tit,',',;. ,..-:'.:.:'.*:'. .' ' *-'4-.,4'.';':•:.,.;;;.' , •.,. ''7'::,'''''' . ,,,,,,,,,,,,,•••'•-•---•-'7'.:::' '".. •• •' .•• • S .''''.'"'"Ns- .--.. .,,,i:".,,.•• .•,,,y‘s$:',„,,•„•,,,• ,,....,,, v• •,-''..'";,,:t,..., .•:.; • :ill,',,,,,,,,,,,,„.,,,,,........''''''' ‘" ''''''•:,'"'''•''' ..,• .- .,o,. "' .. -•••,h(*`,,W •.• = 0 ';‘ , r :,•••r„''• ,,,,, ..7'1 '..:.,4.....,-- 7 ''1.'''',''7'.. "- .-' ''':•-•;77-. • ...** ir - - ,..;01"•!:- '..,. lt,•''''', ' ..isr- ,•.,• ••''''4'•:*,,,,',0---,4, '''-" `.**' 10...,. 7,,,.:-..,:,''.; ''2,,sir:•- •'.,,..•Aid.• - ...,1: . . • ,--._-,, ... •..,*4;1'..., ••••:.. , ovii, '••`'.:-,'- • ..,, ..- •• '•••%.4. •-..,. , . . ' \ . ' ..•. 'I . "- r.„r rr r r•‘•,,,r•r r„-, r r'..,f,,,r„,..,,, ,„, , Mal• rr,r,., , 'rr r..•,'•. r ,r,4., ,4." ,"r• *"• ••••• r• ' •.. (11) . , r•4, .,,,,, ‘.,rs r.. ''''',, ..11k011. ..,,,,r,,,,••,..7•,:,,,,••;.4! '.": r ••••r:•*7;''''"*":,r''••'•'•-I,. a. '••:;,'l'•'''',,,,,,, ior- „. . .„ • .,. 4 * 1311/1 ,r'i,... L L r Is, 4\ --. .!' r ,- , ''t.i,,.t.'..L"•:'• lir°"''•'•.,i• ,,,,'.'Y'''''..7**.•`:....'i ,r11.:5';;.:: ',....,ii ,,,,:,..:.:.,:::ir',';‘,....:-:,..,,. .;,..,,,i.::::::::,,,,_',N'''.',,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,\,,.,.::::...:::.‘,7,.,;\":',-,:,:,:.,.::',...,71,,..,....,,,,:,..r:::'...'.,,',,,;1.,,.'''''''''''ir''',...4.i..'1:4P4SH-- ....:....,:::-.i:,..:',:i.iii':•',':'::::::"...',!'.':f7::'''';":;:,4;:.'11 ',.,...i..':7:- '1::1.''':1'',..',.,,..7*:... 'r;J:,,,,;*....72'.....,''. ''*::4:"...''''' . 64,1i 111,:.1.4''''',.:.:1/4";','',:'''''''''..'''',.,.':',...'...::•r'.•'',";',',47.... '.,.,'••4:::.'::•"" 44 ''••,. '**'''''.,,,,•:,:41ti:",,r'r IA.,,,,,,,A,..,...,., #: r trail.' . ,• r' ..• ':•rf.:.;...ii:•r••• "''' 1./.44‘.P'"'"*:;:.'X'..'"..'':"" 7414''''''': r•:*r".':',,••:4,,•r,,,,,,•.:F*•:...0..,„ rF,•r. ..':,..is, ,,,,e . r, ..,.. 11111111 a ' ':' t.„'..,.. ,.., ''''', •,:,,,,, ...„.,„•,..;'.;•.'..''_,:,,;..:, '''':.:',..4,,-,,,,,, ---\ •';:;i.., 'r''.''•'''',.„- jf,.'„,:',•,',--:,,77'''''''''''' '“,-''''' -- ,.,_.- e,i r• '-'• - ..:''''-'' 'iii,ictirt,:;','. ./^,,,, !...,,I.:,.,,,. 0 '' ' 'C'.. **''''f',:i'st, ...''..'''''; ,-. 71.'Nf,:::::2 -•,'1.', .. ''• - •' . . ,._„.-,...._. -,. -.r',. ^.:,•.,'•.-,'''t.''1,4,.,._ / / ,i.,... • = . . _ . . ...pos . . , . . 4:,• ,• V.1. 4.• - - ,- '.- .!..,,,,,,..,..,..... . ,.,••,- - - . , 7 '=,-„.., 'a*,‘,'''''*-.... *'".. , * , - ''•'.'' \ .'if ,:.. 71 - .‘„,„ ,,,:, . -- --...,,• ..„,,,,,- .,,,- • 4`' *'.0.'' '.:.,*,'`..,,r,*.*:,''.',',..'*-'''..'"-•.- '-1. r ' ''':;-..;*k'r,--. '''' ...,...,,,-,..„,,. _ ,• '''.:C;,,,P2‘;',,N..„, - , _...,,,,,.,.:::::„..,1„ . , „.,., , ... „ ....,. . .... .,:f• ',N.:,..:',,. '.r• '*.P•:'.7:'*.4.:'••• •..:',.•••.•,‘.1(4,,, 'r ,,,+.,,,,...,,,•#:',...47f.:,:.-,..- 1 ''''' .'' . P. -:.:'''' '•'--` 0 -,"•''' - .''''''-'''.',,,,. ..t'-••r .'''.:Lr''' r .•r.,,::::N..''•:•!,,,'-•..,._,...,,,,,,4'0'.•-- t::::1•:- '' : . .,, .,,,;.•:::..,.-',174'.*,,,,,„,.....2::: ,,•,4, :,,,,fir:1 ••,.• •,,," 0 ..., . P.:''''' " ' •'••'• ••• •": •"":.,.:'''',1 ," N. • •'..''•V, •:4*. r'4.• . „r .,...• ..11. i.','" ' s•'.' '' ''-'., .2.- ••.=, ' 4., '• \••••,.,•,•.A..,.,,,,i.,*..,.. .ki\•',..,, t.,....•.,••:,•.:,,,,44.,.:',,.„,„:4 ,..„,. 4EL' elli...,,..„. •.',,,,,,„rf. ,,.,,...,...'.,'.•- ..- '. - mini a r r,r:,••• 'r•„• •'*"• r.'r'"'"'"'•••'.r•'''I":':Prr:'''*" ' \''''... \ t'.•,'••' •''''''P•••r'4%;4'.Pr'" "r.''.. ••': :,7 4 ,_ - '"':.:•,,,- -"'• r !'r ,:••„:,...,:i,,,,ii. .:.!.-- -,-.,..:-..,,,,,,•„...,.: N,r,,,,,..•\ .•_, ,,,..,..-,.;.,:••,i,....,*„„,..-4,.,-, ,„_.,,r,,,,,!...... - , ,,,,,,,,:r. ..,_:: = -•,,,, . , ,,,..,,, •,":4,:•':',-- ,,,„,,,•,,,,,,!t7... -,,,,,-.• '-',:,.:•••,.. _ ... ..,„,.,.,,.4.,*tz.,,,...;,...-.-..•-,:...•••,:,-:•-; _••,,, .40i:.,..,..4r.,,,,4i .i:iii. .., ,,,,,,..!,,,,_ ,,,,. , ,,4,..:,'4,:i \ ..„,..„..,1...,•,. , ''',L,.:,,L,Tr•',.:• :'r• r"1 •• ',•'.r.• .,e.•'T •••''.••:5•.. r l'''' r frillia' ,,,iii..•r, .'•'•,,r . W ,..,,,,, •;:t / , , ,.,. ..'"'''•'r..• •''.27, ..‘. : •,,‘,\ \-.••,.• - ... 41',•••-• ' 'r,•:,,,,,... . -: , • '' ,r...:,, '''''',. #i* '-'••••:••:',''' '''!-,' 4.1-,...„ ••,: _ r..1,,--,,,c!,..„,r.„_, II< ..,..„ ,.....,. '-5., •:,...... ,,•„: .,... ,,,,..,.. r,. ,,,..,..,,,,,,,, . . . i, -.,.-,--,,,,:..,•,,,,, : .r.,,,-:,,,,•:.- • ,••- 1,-.•,-, ttk-•••; , • - il . t• :,_.::,:•...,..,,,,..,,,,..,'..•, ,,i,,,c,r,r r.r,„r''•••",.,:•••,,,',:r. , , , • ''''.••:',, ,r. ,',.,:i"r 'fft‘r. ''•• \•1*' 11",',..'.r •: , ... '. •: i ',4-- dr ' 410•' .I‘ ' .. ' ..,...„. , '--:-'4'Lli:-.7';',:::1,:,.' .14:4';'-,- :-_:'• '' ':,,,.., . ,.. . -. .„ . . :',I '.,;'.,' •.',0-,tis,,,-„-f,,,,:....,?:•. ..:.',... .i:-:_,,,';':. ' ,..e .,•-. %140. CO .•'' - . : .''r--,,,,, .,',.,..,4,,,,,,, t•AL ' '* . - - .,,.•,r., AWAt, ' ' • MN II Lic, rail' CC) -Tal 3 la) 0 ............. .. ,,-./D .............. _ ‘I, u) i IN, r ril CD tit _ ... - - I • ' ..--- . C> C•! ... _ CD ,- ....., a c) c) I I I in ......, 1 I I tn I ..... ,', ':', ..) ,.., Li) :::: LU LJ LU ',"-- ,..-. LUN- 1...1 l•-• LU ,k- .1•2: 1-...J 7 0 Lc) PO in t-) tr.) i Li) Li)tr) CN in i CD (1) CD CO 1'0 CO N) CiD N- N- CD ‘-' CO (.0 CD a) CI) , 0 E CD ---.... CD V) = ,_:_: i ,:_: S Lo EN :: •• D: „.:: I in (C) = Cl) (t) , :>•-•0::: ,... 6. 0 >,.. CY)Z ST)•• CN,-- - - CD - - N) (3) G) = (3) I r•-• °I 'I (3) = (3) I C`,1 ()) .• 7-- c.,:i CD •• Is.- >< (..-- >< 1.-- CD 1"."- 1.--- CD -- f----.0.) (1) ...< . Tri ,.... o ,.__ ,_ Cn ,_ 0n ,- D: cn ,_ 0) ,..... 0) - = ,-, TC) c-I ',..„ C) >,‹ CD CO OD T.-- >.< CO GD CD •.--- •,e- ......, D • :, •-- `- 0 q) .) (I) 2- 1--- (1 cD Z Cn cD Z C2) cD ...:..; .-- C) Z cn Z cn .• t--.2 CD CD 0., 11.1 0 -",„ -0 ,! ., ,...:-- '• CD ,- CD --- "" CD ,- .. ,- !",- IL: '-' IL: z .--- c)E 5 ,, ,2„, —..... ,..., c, .., , (..r) ,--- 1 __, (f) _.., z z •,-- EZ Z C) Z C) "- Z C) CD Z z --'-0 C) Z -- - z ,- - C....) _ ¢ p c) ¢ (±S cp -4:c cn- - - f:':::j CD ....c 6 CD ...c 6 _ 6 c) CD CD _,.C _ CD CD 1-0 Z __, CV ___, -_, Z _, C,1 _, ,f -j • - c,j - - c) - ,t- cD ± cD CD cD CD cD CD T CD 2 cD CD cD CD T CD ?.2.,12 v) ,- (1) a) I - .-- c) .-- CD .- CD ' -- ,- CD ,- CD ,- CD , __.- •::::. . ., cl .. TIT) = t'l ''-' Cr • = Cr • = (X • = in `•-• (X • = (X • i CX • = 'zi- "-- (X • M CY) -- E CN CD C) CD CD CD C) CD CN N-.) 0 CD C) CD CD CD CN CD C) C) ,, ,-, CD cy, 63 1 N- CD 1..,j CD u j CD u j I C) CD uj C) u j CD Lu I 0::) CD LuL,'" -y- -0 ...-..'...! v, a ,, 1 LiJ E -,,c •- r4-) 1,-. T.- qt--- cz, (NI qr.-- cq.) rn qr- c) cq....1 (0 s--- qt.- ce 7.7, .. ---1 -e.. C) --' r.--) ''' Cq =- 6,._ .: =" OL il: =' Ci: -- ''') cN =" L. -.-- =- 6:. =" a: IL: CD ci: --- n ;!, 11 - CD ...c '..Ti-3 C12, .-, - C - ,- ili Z p ±. f: c) Z DC '-c-S .--: LU ±. CI cn 8 .: - -• LU Z DC cl-E: — A (....) , ._.0 a) Cl) — Li) ...c (....D —L., — L.1 — LU -‹ ....c CD }--- L.,.) I--- LU 1--i.,.1 in -< c_D ,- LU = Cl) 1--- -, v) v) v) -.-, Cl) cn Cn .- --, Cn ,-- -- . ,i, ili 1 -\, .... , . tal ,.-- \ (---7 ) , a III -/ II •1111 emir . r a 4 • r a an ---- a al a a , a a -,...„ a . 1 ii,„ c IL . ..< XIII __A„' Iii mom . de .i. J cr .., ....._ , , 1A. •-,„ ,,,i a I • 1,... a /' a C .... ...„, , , ,,.., .. ._______,..,,..,....,..... II Si MR 111.11 II I c 111 1.„... cr. ,,...., al i Cri: ie..; ,..-,.. . ...,, ...,L,4,,,,r, iflEk`,,*- Ili Li_ -- .,,,,,-1, ) , LI- , - ----"" ..-',. - •,'- / II T „. .- iji c ...... sil :.• ..., . , 0.1111 ILI 11 11111 . "111 II LI a Lim m IN til act OA 1111; CL I * NIL • , a Ii. _______ mi "--- a ill r----r- I , .k m a .. ,• . ... mini . , 111 . , am a : .... ) L.......,, . . ._, milleilii .N11 i Ivy a sicii .... ....• ...,A1 • IF I I jill Ili C.... :11 • i • iii-j:/N) , _ 111111 , . 1 c r N,...11.1 IS Immo vs. mul - owe iti.. NIP ‘,. ....._ ____ 1 • * . c) w- rri a_ a_ CL *--- i ....... 1 r...., I CD (-‘1 ,t -- ,t- -- ,.,.. , — C) CD CD r--- I c) I cz) I ,: ,a) F cs.i r•-• in CCD in CO u-) : R En c--) — ,I.: —• ,:..: — v) (0 1 = I = I >- .— ..tc — CD t----:Lr) X LC) X Lo -, z a ta...1 ,..__, •. ;L.: CD. CD CD 2n CD CD _ 7.7.-.'' "'•:-= I.) '""-.— C,..3 0..., Z ,...__.-- CD 1— '" C) .--- '' C) CD u) ,-- ___, ___, V) CD Z '--, *-- - '"-±" CD CD ,-- - 1--- '."- C) --J t..- .,- - ..0 6 CD ..c cE,CD ...< (E.S _ CD CD , Cl. rr) Z ..,_, 0.1 ____, ,4.- -J - - _ c....4 CD — C,J — CD • . •ct. c) cp CD CD C) V)----- CD T--- 43 ,... I ---, .-- CD I-- CD '''-' cp a E .. (D Tti ›. = 00 -.- x • = CC c) = cr 0 = --a En Lc) — cNI Lr) 0 c) 0 - 0 - '---- ......., 0-0.- Cl) cy) • '< ,r, 1 — (:::, Lu CD w CD m S 1 LI C ''''C•- c',4 CD T--- ---. (7.) (NI U.-) cp r0 LI-) cD, Cn I 1 11 Q) () --" 00 1'2 r'l >'' ci: - >'' CL: •• >' 6.... •. rc-Li A A - CD ..c :ii-5 o cn — f, -.:3- *--: Cii ±CC C21 Z CC C-) Z X la- ......_-.__- cLC cocl) (S)ri-i t.4). -.._.5, C.)v.-3' 1.1_1 .-- LU .-- LU (C) Cl) -4- iii --..--- I NOI.....,....„ , ,... \,. .7, .. \,... - -' ) ,....c---,- \ -, • ,..,.....,.....2,_____es „ . LL CS '2..z---s. I •43 Uhl ii --..•,•,•,,„ ‘,..„...N' LI a 'Th , -, \ • LL \ ..... 101 i ii a . a ,1 a n _ • 1 • ).:\ 1 Ni ci 1:=F4.„_ •_ • t a la -----_ 1111 .-- -) --L 1111911 a Ci • ...re .. • me 0. 1)1 a , \ /..'*,' ,,..., • 111 a .. IIII 1 a ,. ' • C ---------1) PI . • ' -----'.------ ?---; Jr r.imi, ( • 2 ' , .... ... \II \ • .. 9 .9 0 f'''. .1<G. 1 I §ilm • • cri / I r---r- / lit i• .. \--------/-*" ------,, .., -\--------1/4- ,--_, `'\ 7-* i „...„4 . I I 1 s 1 , I I - , "Ilia '''\ ' l,f.,„ ,.... I 4 a \-( Irlicilliiii'l 'rr-3r.:114 l' !.'"--'1\/, I \ • H •iii , , I.\ F— • . _. , 1 ISO ro ---''.2.. • _ 1 ( •,..,., i i • 6-• 1 . -. I I ....\ V r 1 , 7 ' MIMI i 4 -...., I . :1 CD CD C•i_ _ C) ,..... .4., ,.... 0 .r.... M '''''"' M CD I I 1 ro - f- I tr) 1 - - w u..1 I.A..) ,--- - Lo 1"- w r--- w -0- = w Ci sr") r n r.... Lc) i-o in Po Lc) I ,c, (N if) CN in I C.) a, ,; Ty. 0 13 (N CD (Di ti") CC) t'r) (C) N- N- (C) ---' co ‘- (.0 01 0) (I) ..., c CD -,... CD r0 " 1 ......."" M in CN 1 ,L..... = •. M in Lo = (/) v.) - CD -4,1- 1 ri,CD 3..E CD :: 01 1 ' 0) = Cr' t-±". °I 1 eN cr, - ›- _ cn z ,77D C....! CD 4-.- 3_1.: rs- ,..., 1".".. >< r-s- CD i:-..- r.'-' ><1.'"' >< 1...'" : 1" p ,:... ,- V .. ° . ‹ > - c 7 ,-- -- — CD s.--- ma) 1.--: M ,..._ M ,-... = M ,__ M ,__ CY) v--- = M -7 -.....' , . ,-- v-10 ,J., ,.... ,.... m e--- X CO CO CD "-- x CD co Cl) ___ x co i.. cr q 1--- - v 0) 0 ...,.. ,- cD CD Z CD CD Z CD C, ..v. .-- Cl) Z Cl) Z CD - ,....ncs-cl, w . ,- - -,0 , - ....„- -c-- -- c) F.-- -. CD .- "' CD ...- 1...- ,- Z 0 c P' ri CI ,..... - f- ,..... I- ,.,.... c) z .-- CD - ,- c, - .-- z fr- ..- 0 Ur; ;--- 1 ....., Z Z ., Z _, Z .. Z , Z .. z o CD ... c) C3 CL ......, c-,1 ...., Nt- ___, eN in Z ..4- CD *--- C‘i ---i ( 1 CD ,- ---1 'Z''IN- ----i -) C) - ,-- CD CD CD CD CD .. Z CD 2n CD -- (N CD 9 CD 9. CD 9- c ± CD7D CD VI , CD •-c v)...--, .--. el) a) CD CD - ---- CD ,-- C) ''''`' C) --- .--- C) (L) C.) E - 0 ,...: - ro ....... cr . m cr . = cr - = ir) .-- cr - i Cr - m IX • i Nte - cr • =r-r,o U ___,, CN cp0CD C, CD 0CD ...iri--) 0C) 0C) c) cNic) c) c) - CO 1-r) ..--- - ,.., Cl)cn --j; f N- CD w CD w CD w I CD CD Li C)w CD w f CX) CD w...,_, m (D0 -0 m .iE to .„(..... c:-.) CN --- c) r'") v--- c) eN N. ‘.--* ',"-- cp CN 7 CDTO ‘- C) eN (.0 .--- .-- CD I W.- 1-- Q.) ...- C-) ---i PO ''..1. Ci EL: •- ci.: ..-. a.: _. --, (3...-- -- ''.. ci. .:--- . 6....• - CD ' ca....' '-- Li) II II ..._. -c.). ..cz -k3 C) m - - -F- Li zxce-Szct8zcKc-3 ,..--:C.6* ±(x8crc3zrEc.---: ,t- i:-: LU z c7 'E)- ct A A c.) .- ..c Q.) Cl) - 11) ...c (...)4-- 1.,..1 1--- LO I-- W •,:c -.0 CD o- LsJ .- LO '*---Li...1 tn .:cu.- 1.0 ' I----- (r) •cc a. Co c.) LI) - -1 (') Cr) Cri X --, (I) V) (1) i-- -.... (7) .....- 11•11 --- • V , ,--- • • '--,,,, ___,...<...--..4 • 1 LL • 1 IIII 1 1 411111MM \. o r o . i I, CI ,,,....„ . al le t(t IP. -11 i—I — —---:./y, r! Aali 111 c 01 0 f LL • i--III 111.111 alas In C • 94 -I- - j-- a - - --- -' t I - -IMO a a C H - _ . , ,,.., -, a .. . : „...„.,.. a 0. 1 Pill a • V a 1, t- I ilei • _ I ‘ Iliu. 111 (4' (1 \ „.„',., 41. , ....-.. ,..,-, ih us 0 ,....... ,...... . , .., , , s ,....--, a II ( C ..... Mil 4 AM= C a 1112 oihi el U. LI .11 IIIIII 1 111 C .,,47:up_L6, . MI yr 9 I 4 g ' C e _. .4 ill trii Ion - sr: 1- a al t: oci I = VC, . iii. JIII .1-47 - k.zeiz--. Cf: illara . 1 I I i • i PI /— ,5---,. , in a 1 i-- •) a 111111111 ...• 4 4) >I r . , 1 s „cc d rid 1 1.--- i '4- • 1 ) iii re,37.71/4. , r/ 1 a aleill• ill al0111 ., a aliMm . 1 1•111111/11 li 81111;:: .--r"--- ----) 1 . . . 1 ix 1 1 1 , , . , . (.. ois. 1 140. I I .i ' I I .- 1 I i , \ V -\\\ : ,/,,,,e: '1,,), 1 1 i'\ i : 14' "-----I. 1 1 t 1 1111ii. -1 \\\ _ -I- I i i -I- III N Oe-ZC \ -----' l 1 N G4-ZE* r---1 -..„ , /." , . Aflif err lb'1 ActELLerator ... >TM r h'i. } } ,,:',e: °I' 4 4., :,;.,,,,,,i.,., 41: , . .. • Fast Zoning ,, zo , :m. �; # y , ' '• Approval i C P , ,, „,,,,. , ,, , • .. .. , . . . .,„ , . Custom c ch ,,,:. , .. ..,.._ . Z` Configurations , likimmEriessw 1 . CV < r LLIII:1d+kJ 1 ', " :I t ZS , .1. :, P i' Jumper Cables * lg . Included , P tn 1 Height: 72 in. Diameter: 16 in. , SPECIFICATIONS Electrical Mechanical1 Sector to Sector Isolation 40 dB Dimensons: Height 72 inch(183 cm) Port to Port Isolation >20 dB Diameter ' 16 inch(41 cm) Jumper Cable Connectors 7-16 DIN(female) Rated Wind Velocity s 100 mph(161 kph) Lightning Protection Chassis Ground Side Wind Load @100 mph 160 lbs(710 N) ,(Optional air terminal kit) _- Weight 130 lbs(59 kg) For all other electrical performance specifications including radiation Mounting Hardware 4 ea.3A-10 Bolts on 12 inch pattern data,please refer to the individual antenna data sheet. bolt circle >30 dB port to port isolation available on special order. L , , ACCESSORIES Model NumberDescription tomncn�� — ..... _ . ........ LPK-1 Air Terminal Lightning protection kit including 24 in.Air terminal and 20 ft.#4 AWG copper pigtail. i LNAC-X-X-X Amplifier Housing 16 inch.O.D.x 24 inch tall canister for housing receive low noise amplifiers. Can be supplied from the factory with LNAs and RF cables i pre-installed and tested. MOUNTING OPTIONS Model Number Description Comments ., MTG-A00-02 Mounting Plate * 16 inch dia.Steelplate with matinghole patterns for AcCELLeratorTM series antennas. Use to make your own custom mount or monopole adapter ^_ a MTG-A10-02 Mounting Mast 10 ft.x 4 1/2 in.O.D.Galvanized steel pipe with welded antenna i mounting plate. MTG-A20-02 1 Mounting Mast&Wall Mount Kit E 10 ft.Mounting mast plus brackets for wall attachment. I Note: Patent Pending and US Patent number 5,757,246. ' Values and patterns are representative and variations may occur. Specifications may change without notice due to continuous product enhancements. Digitized pattern data is available from the factory or via the Web site www.emswireless.com and reflect all updates. C "STEALTH"PROPOSED ANTENNA 1.IMIMIIPMMIMII...M1..11.1......M......M..ON.......N.M.I.M•.IMM.N......N......IM......... g .-- 0 •. ii-E.E,Zri'rZg;Z,VZ5, l'i .4./ SI cl ,, I 1 I 11 , . 410"49*-147K00 4 Xi'Z'I I Z 11.i''''-ii•° ..t.^.8A " Cr- u, ss' -islia „--'" -- N1 ----('' -- 0 ','• 1 i - ,- ,..., „ 6 Nt 8 E 1 x X R 4iii °- , o-CO. ._-----__------- -- 2 --- , - N-1,,,\,-------1.---, . 1-,___.-------- __- ----)-- ' - _____--- . - .. - ..,,,,,..,,,- .• ,.....,„f.,---t , , ...,•,_1! •,,,„..,5;4_ ,,,,,,,,,,..- 1 ,.., .,,,.... X ' /7 e •?, 119----3- --- - -/. ,,,*5 - ' • k : 1 rr1 lo --- ‘. ,--V --- - -- , J4r;,; /-,4*,•••;,,,'..-,...,ity.t'.744-.., ..,! -.7,,, *'-'-‹ , ____ _____- / \ . • • 40.-e- 52.0',AC•c.g.1,""\'\'..ritil,..;(46.4 -flf9,_ 0 - • ,. .. „ \ '' X'' Z./4- gr••• .. •• ='111.--4.4.,',..w , . , ( j‘..:',///- ,•., A 10;41,2:Al kfat Allik tiitis4..k 1.0.t (-1),. ,0,,_ , - .,. .. \,, -2.rx7,P . . + 11/ .11 7P*1"11'11' . 'Vile •••%9 , • 7* •••• __.._ '..,,cotv-,,/ A../ z Iiii ISIIIIii \ ./1,0,., .s. - 7k: ti, --1' ' \ .-- - - , -;••(-' '', "‘: -.70 „..Q.... , ...,, ..... ii_,,...._---.....------- .. , ..6„, .:.,------...„ .„,,,, ,........„..„.„...„ ,--,-,„,,si- ------ ..---.... --vat--•2,4- -4. a‘ _ - .9-1' ,,,,,,,,,,6.i:-„,,..,7................... .,4.-4--........--- ,.,... ,:.............. _________ __.--- ''"...,--.,e,;..: .., 14_._it.,;.--- ,.,.,, •' 4 1 .. V.A -,..,4"ki l _ki--,,SIELI--,,,„-T-- -%,,0,\- pv „.< 1,1 , _._.. _,_____ .. _.,_.,_4,_ _.‘ -...12_...--, 1. .-'*- ii.''tz_-___ •.,:- — 4a1 • ----::::::*C- 1 -1 - 1- -3 ---------0-ca-,A. --- -- .i--- t k vli_.------:::1_ ----.-...F.:;-^ ------- 6 , • \ ''''''''............. ..'' '''''"''''''—11 cii.li::1:11'''.•... z '''''''''''''''''''9'.:....1...14..'...--_.......... ****...,„„ .\ _--.................. I- _____-4-3-- 1 ‘,\'..\ • t• , ------- 'Ker!,,, , _,,,,•,,_ ...\,6_ ..,,,,----------------------- - --- The MO:S AI HOMEY 44t, 7 ,,,,\ ............,.\......-,7...-•, \ _ ____. ,/ i ___.---, 1 -- - -- . lk,‘... ''' -41/4-------N- ''''' Ai... -•• \- , _.,. . c-, N 4' xi, \._.-------°4-44.4 ----- ''- / 0 \ , •?, % , , c) rri ) 10 Li ,------- . –. i , ‘ -; -• 4 4,, --(2. ni 8 Fr q i 1 1*-3-± " -. g: : 0 • s'i rii;,' PPA 1 qg ,1_11- 23 4, , Ri 1 ,(1 gT- — P iii 4e , 2--.,, 1 °,1';i ?-i g ., .0 8 A . A L1! fldr ' N CO 12_,C)°2 i II° ..1':`9 /57 Akt • ..'c''';:P V° ,s i 1 i ,,ricli § .ROO -......,,,,,,___ ht 2 un § 61 9 f- TO -\ Qr,, q 0 A A \,.' ,5. z v.,, ,,, ,t ci. 0 o x9 p ; F,g -0.. %. I'. ci) ''',P.,6.8 ,'.,-• „i ..,?:-..-. t, 0 @ •-,. ,,,,,L.$, Z g„,-'' , ;76 2iI4 2 ,-, Rci•-) z r-gm '§t C',' , 2 g al, - • • c,) ----, zo ,,. 6 °!R ' op 1111 II \ P ;1 71 Iii 2 _6], ii,.,, !N d- -6: 8_ g .8.. q rrl -..21 ,, .... i+ t 1 --" ,;;;;:,'L;;,.3.1:',3: 8-'6'2 ,,tr,I, 8 i3 I li .., i.,, ',..qqT!1 ......................____ i Y P - •, 2 0 i t i . Q 55'-10 13/16-DOSTING WAPA POWER POLE W/UNIPAK ANTENNA. 6.-0. . 1 6'EXTENSION,REFER TO SITE PLAN FOR LOCATION m 1-: • !')41!1 i m 6 i ?3 r- 0 1 gi A Pif a N Q . 92888 3 3 'd-I !I0 it m 4 a „ ..kg Z 2 § ii&jr! m NNN P- 1 tTi Q 1 1 • ____ f3/4a- 8 C/1 1 1 — — — — — S r r r r r r r r C 1 i i v":1(^,,,v8,% �r` � "'�'t. I lfi t c4 V !!!!!!!!.!;11 [ . .q I R1 Ila 5,,so li ,.fig ----,,,------' it ted. N/ r 4- ell # .. 4-4111.19' - fib+ , / jowo•P-174.,, ve, , , ......i,...., ......,...,..,,„..„..,A. ,,, / /,,,,,v- Agfir,,, , ,,,,,,a-4...,__weltilit- // 1R_-,....., ,!, , -_:_:_., -.., 10,s, / 04%V' j `Or`- + 1,111, 914 S git. OJ 96( .sr* tc/ �►`� �_ •..lam�� tl/ v J ii°115i'.1. gi - A 4 „, ,,,,,:i.. -,.,.s., Illi :,.„...'. ,,._..__ 1 , _________„ 1::----. ii ---4'.. 11 - - ..'Af ,.-• ; \isl_._.••,,,,y.•••• ---. op- 11 g B-1SA7t� cb: �, ry yIl/, ' I��3 o L49 :'''''' 4 .--------- --"-- .., FO-k --. -311 N 1 11 ----- ) 6 ' j '& \.y, J ./..-.'- _ .fir ........_..gt•...................: r �. IIIW t _______—.,„i Q0 g. .,,,,,.___\_____ ,101905 p \ �C�O x. -viOr © 111=i111..w�.-.• ,I,i�4` 1 �' � III'II-I 1,1 � �I'ill=Ilr;P�f.�It,u�1,y' 0 O • ryy Q II-Milli'� •t•„yiyii' O Z 101 v`1 sO,� �� z Y� 'I''I�'�tle' !::,, 1, ..6 i i :1 4r /I (119 -4111 I ,_-_-,C: , 4 r ,, i v V li 1 1 1 111 t 0 O 0 �--ter 16=��I W! I�-1!I I=W-III © 0 ��l�lli 1--ill�ll ill} =1!l--II© -ul= 0 gil d1 I lff'.iai`iTi 61 1 Ildl II ld 1 Q�la VIII Llld © , .III=,1-I V l J1-4161w rm II 161;'IL Nl Ild`=pI.. � � uIII�IILi,:iIII.N =n Illl_f�,l�.I���• IUw1111 if61 �a�r11 0 '��`1� II II_titl to el��il� a r'0i a�f U= ”o Q 1h U x+11. UIJ "r d " ' cl� tpi ail ut,u. s 0.0...••, o1 111•0111 'Qa A � 111 In �l_��1-pu_ pp€ •, ��s Ill �1� �� � ,; N�{S - .1.0iIpl liil>Cr=1l. p 1, t-f1tl zAl ��� - ��� � �i• a.Wiz' n q`0 'IV ilp�tlltnlltilll "4;- �plt : ... a \ 'A; A ;" ■ i y 10 I it �, 1 A i ��I O 1111 �� ���B gip_°- , IIII � <�c ,I��tW••'• . \ ��� 4�i� lr;;a_ 6 ft i ilCCIR ridPs' L It ii ;, HI SIS / ll .��li � ���� R�is thIFI Ofl ' 1I=1'il r1' I!��I r�,=41:i C ti►tfi ' if �li 9 t „„,...,II11:w,�l.c,„„ii„,,, d i f 11a1``I i1 h S �1-t _ _ d _ t i R Ri il it.a 1 � I 1 ; �� t lf, Ariz; inr5U! til °� �c Eccc�c � t 1 1 f um t11 irift"� is. 5 Y 1 is R s i R � � R 0 J Ir•, � I1. 1 ' ^ 9 33 T qg n 5 'I C A m O pN �! a 4� hh N-3 .. m n z r� z ,' 7i U4JOi C O ,C/� i. .. 1 NNv! g o . [� - =1 o♦N�iv -� O i gx ifti It oi g $ A2 nYy nv c 'Oam m s mtri r tt nop L.G mCP Qrt m -g 3 I 0.0*-. 04x.x,I j rz o o i .. r'! puuu N4�S�'vS _ _ 0 i-s-F6: 4 tri lil i .. (s2 l#..H S N,q * �t a �9v1 qi !I: 600, gl . !,, ''.v.- 01, 1!. 0 • A %.:iw r AID O 0,f`' ../.+ iivrietall% • ;i-- apt .,;1_#,P.4 .. x./../..././447,fetit ' ,_.. IkblittiA4 • et pzinikli � 7 j 11 Vriatkigho iti�!�`,�'+`I ,covet \\. Y• ° 10,6 // 'c./ &NO''4,1cfp4AZ ..W/"+ 1r �I t/ ill vJ404.0 ��•y -- y;, � :, I :: 41**!"''''f...:47.1,ri.t41e/fin >tl. 't/, ------r .'+b.. '•,L� GD _ sh ..... iiipv....,it. 44.41, 4 „,,07---:, 1;!:z.. i......_._____._..........”.1"'" 0.00 s#"1" '- • -'LI'-,,i--i::1:::.,-\s T"--;iv._ ..,. \ \\) • (. ........._.\7 .... t-1164• *.2100. 40 ® /l � " ��, b. i3 �'11 .y •,7� .•7��3-0.pR• 1 ,,� _' X noa • • All. —..............010, ../,,,,.. I li ._________ , ,,,, \ . ..4 1, j" ------- 21° +b �.. . 44.t',.#10. ` oi coos -,$ x. g" ~ * ' z ai Iw Prl C _i ---.1 I P ,s, 0 1 / Ilir 11114 qV N7q 1 el cz:23 0 -,O, i- -g II . qOI� t11',7 r d m \ W • C) I U FYtr� r'I `i V \ "n y Vv • m ~ :E; ((vr , qoqs mi 513ptifiut P) litiglkgz _, til p O ® vk r e © is 0 lil() O -Wl" -c-'' '�j 7gQ i ~ " X PO " o ,i' ....1 il He Z °zee z ,,, I„' , (/) ,,-, ' .1 $"[5: [ --i ii t lJ�f G21 OO L 7 Mir H 1 1 p °'; ,;, i , t i -0 i c) 117, - ..E § AM liP i 0 iii 1,.! (j)grilyt5 r 2 rEil - 4 11i1 a 51. i" z fid / i z i cpi �, 0: y i� 1 01 CLQ `, .. t7 A S n m lit C C -y�V L '� ..V g _ a _ H § g 1 g ,. i i 1 E '°A � � of tai iTt _o__,� a = i 2 i -VI 6c���4 �i�i fir, ? f. q 6 ----fiil Xg. s `" tq, ' g, A ' 4. 71 § Olgy 'i4 i pr . � U � U UUUUU � j � ti� 1 i 1 z ! ! ......;..:,.......................... c :J (: �` U b N Og 0 0:: g + V b I Pq! " ! ,:, Q7,1 r i Q OC '4 < r -o23 C A m i 2 f► V I ✓ 1 P�'F C ] A Vl -+ u z r,i'Nu1. O O A l I d y m In O tmyn O tD ,nr ., , „ F 4 A W b A Z �n N A 144 0:1 g:E col I 88 r'A O g o O 1-•� ,,TU A Ns,,, Z O p �n 2< =i.,r N 11'f�Z N O 1 txi MA ill '''' m 0'0rN N N Ncr 8- cn i cn 1 G i 1 i i y 7t7 4 S C F 4 n ' / / A ,i (i A .%. �. Z } ;-8 tm 0 T'' t %N. y P O N N o ,51 op o o ' Q 0 zT ---1 A Y m Y m Cf) \fi 1 '; F 1 y=s 1 d to P *rsi 11 Z'5: 2 Z'5:4 :14 W15: P::::r.;:t. v1 +PN11 •\\\\ 1 1i� 1 +`i J� 1 :afl' 1 1 1 l I I Pr I I r P V A ,� tiSs 1 st a tti m t' nZ M N m(AN y Og <_ - � E, -o c r� m a o � N pi > 'Ro7oDA fl ni\\ !Aoa N � �m � � � 3 I t- VI (A m m m m N N N N .., cn i e; 1 8 '''''''''''''''' , i :,-1! � r N Is z 0 vr!! ,_ ,,I I1p I II � AAa ' �� I I 'Fri 1, , m I 4- A \ I .Si! . r -wow , , , • A a-', , , . 1 logiu7,,,...%. r : 4 K ; I It''Adtrarvitiii.11 lk ,,,,,, fii I m x s "'g R ►i� AI O SIT f �i G7 ui = o(�7 n,� _;=.4,,,w� llj 1 y m c� oD CA g a .����� f r I uI111 g m fazm m viz -- Az z Itj r Flr � Ullul m ! 8 m 1 i-i rE m i 5-1 ! s Sc �SOy10'10E D a � 4 yyti l[) m � p� ; 2� < oN� yr�p�� D���v IIS--� 002 Ny O �2 �a X � �r.,� � _ r j I ., oo, ilU_. :iE, YZ N 'r-9 t; ,' ogz t';'6. sloz� �2 '-2 R aP ,goy vo �o i� pa�� Q I 1 - i r1; m yI I gRgr �la N�m2 A= D {�8 2- Zl 0 I A,mg O Iqh Z P; � d� I a Z I I 1'-3't i,`2 LI 1 A D o 7.. IL. _ r - -lip r IwUI, � =P_nig O ��c 0 NORTH Ir iln �___ 0 iiia: r Ill n� 8 ';']g r Ell 1 ., j ' !I ME Z N to g C) r 419 I4.-6% a, C) 1 , 1 ■ z '--1'--- -IPI n, - fir Z I- l itl4 I I n11L 114: ,I O I I I III Sill I I a I I i I �^L .4 anal •' { 8 .0 I A iu� li I TYP. is I I II .90 g unl I r I Iq�, I I ITfiul g � ' I Tull J{�) -�i ii_----j�� 1M'-Al I 1 On, Itl 1-111�kk�l�;• 11 1 I• 8' I =1t I I I�A.111 I iL--11---____ ,�=�u111_o,niL8'TYP. irutig g 1 r--- --- - �� Z 2'2 Ill; , ii4 8. 01ruF- c , I. I O L; c - o // lily lIr _ {III t\> _9111--_ ` m , r� y 5" LI 1 \\ III l L I I I I O o n-' / m-, Ni 1. g2 O ori z z `f: Sez N in' D P r 111 22E , 1 \\ 19n1 p;o �� g",- 2� $m> P // t 7,Pg_ ?die mcg 2 \\ 1N 'IjU 111 o.* ,e �A "'-" �� O // �J Ilr o o NZ O r DL19 s G� O �Q z + III m ngm / III= F ��-"orn � \\\ 11��m oR D� �o z � Z � / IIII� r�o Xzrn > o \ Itll oY 42 A� o r / H \ 1 0 m2 z -o • mD P4, 8� A 8 O �i �, \ o§ m r� \ NI Z� rF�\ 5. 8 \\ 111 i > mo N._ .�_,,.. - A _ \ f :� S m \\ III Z1_ .5 „�- �F pp �! y> . Z \ I� 0 rT4 y \IIIA Om 0 r -IV Q \\ li�i o4 go o i°1gt cn r __ m o \ 11 Z tri ;-. •utltf� I I Q c ,�g �I' u 2 \ , v R ,.i 1lBBt 1 p X till \ �s '�S 1�o go ITill ��i� I I I 1 m \ 11YI II z `� l 41 I zo zv \ �= m m m m g ' it=A :c al ,iii iii .ci S mo N„ I C” .24 1 a •II ry a 17i -f yr91Q �z, I ''t lu c^r� L--- III1�I ( i t q A rf m 11' ill''��Ill[111' 111 O --1 S 7 1 11�I �+' I LI II ISI 4 o I r iai - /° or I I f t A N ,,,,, .1 9 . 9 ki, g 2 m g2 Y M f,l NN - 9 2 r_S r00. r22 n o 'o u w2 3 . m 8 a o ' g 4 ,`>" P u ' n -t A O O g _ K Y 9 v � � o � Z X Y N U V o,U m 1,Cy(4��4I1> O z g ?o O rn _a c 'nNi i.'IgOA3 M NI iiii lc' /6�. Vn� Wm C) Z 7 IA m �,IIO ' O Zy F(i O a p oo8op fS� 2 f O L ffXYY 1 !A' o ILIz'° N Z J rn o v ryr�,- io ►-r1►N t� r VS < iZ��n y ZSi ciF8ro: rnao � i Otilt .ig 8 nn=� rn � r PiA �� ? mmy, m r� r� r� r� 8 1 d ui NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING CUJ � J / 2-(7C' 1 OV-6-0101 Proposed AT&T Wireless Facility NAME: Address: /17/6/eitf-' ("1/4/61/ �a1d� / 7r NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING OU-S-0101 25-(3 i4tv\; -r?)I Proposed AT&T Wireless Facility NAME: Address: ( Arndt go a e,t) 4 �j(6 ,C I 1 61NAJt- it l/3 eor • 7)114 A A:cj 4a/AA- /31Q•yg7i e ZefiJfil J „fo-liA) otx-05 fref, 6 /7, - ---D- - --- - Jain, Sangeeta From: Robert A. Felix[ Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 4:42 PM To: sjain@orovalley.net Cc: Walt Neighbors; Sue Franklin; Michael Kaye; Mary Carr; John Merrill; Jim Haney; Ed Pendrys; Dan Griffen; Chuck Walton; Jane Amdorfer; webbm@msn.com; mcarroll©pobox.com Subject: OV06-01-01 Sangeeta: The SCVCAI Board of Directors learned today of the request from AT&T Wireless Services'to install a minor telecommunications facility on Quiet Rain Drive in the Estates at Honey Bee Ridge. On behalf of the homeowners in Unit 5-3 of Sun City,the Board would like to make you aware of some of our concerns. 1) Although we understand that notice and hearing requirements have change over the past few months,the Board and neighbors adjacent to this proposed site respectively request that a hearing be conducted so that concerns related to this proposal made be aired in public. 2) Given the location of this building, the height of the structure,which could negatively impact the view of homeowners in Sun City looking westward. I would respectively request that the height of the building be minimized, and notice provided to the homeowners in Unit 5-3 of the height of the structure relative to the elevation of their respective lots. 3)Knowing that one of the issues we discussed when reviewing a proposal to locate this facility on our property was the potential noise emitted from the air conditioning unit for the facility,what if any review of noise has been reviewed and is there an acceptable level of noise which will be permitted? Thank you for your attention to our concerns and I look forward to hearing from you. Respectively, Robert A. Felix, CMCA, PCAM General Manager Sun City Vistoso 520-825-3711 www.suncity-vi stoso.com • gogieut 6-A624- ALFRED S. DONAU HI CERTIFIED CRIMINAL LAW SPECIAUST ATTORNEYS AT LAW ADMITTED TO PRACTICE IN ARIZONA AND MONTANA TELEPHONE HN R. BOLT SUITE 501 (520)795-8710 CERTIFIED FAMILY LAW SPECIAUST FELLOW OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF 3505 NORTH CAMPBELL AVENUE MATRIMONIAL LAWYERS FAX KEITH A. SINGER TUCSON, ARIZONA 85719-2033 (520)795-0308 April 11, 2001 pri (777,77777 P 7;1 1 u Town of Oro Valley Attention: Sangeeta Jain, Planner I e H O OOZ Om OOOGCQCjOG Ca NC3CG Community Development Department 11000 North La Canada Drive Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 Dear Ms. Jain: Re: OV06-01-01, AT&T Minor Telecommunication Facility I recently purchased the home located at 730 East Cool Mist Drive in the e Honeybee Ridge g subdivision, and I oppose the construction of the above-referenced facility. I do not understand why the facility is being sited on common area at the entrance to a beautiful subdivision, with an antenna high atop an adjacent utility pole, when there would seem to be a number of more suitable sites in the area, including commercial areas close by and other less visible sites more suitable to such a facility. My home is the closest home to the facility, and the antenna adds to the obstruction of and further detracts from my view of the Catalina Mountains. Further, AT&T happens to be my cell service provider, and I use my cell phone all the wayto and from myhome every day without any problem; therefore, the facility is unnecessary. In addition, thoughthe . utility equipment at the entrance to this beautiful subdivision would be partiallyscreened from view, it will nevertheless detract from the appeal of the entrance. If the facility is intended to enhance the cell service of another area, it should burden that area'sro ert and views. P p y Very truly yours, DON• & BOLT frd vie' Jo / R. Bolt blm April 11,2001 Ms. Sangeeta Jain,Planner I Planning and Zoning C :ILIV/Mr-Nri11000 N.La Canada DriveM Oro Valley,AZ 85737 la SPR 1 o 2lflfl v Re:OV06-01-01,AT&T Minor Telecommunication Facility BY: Dear Ms.Jain: This is a PRELIMINARY response to your letter of April 3,2001 regarding the proposal to construct a "minor"facility at the northeast corner of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard and Quiet Rain Drive. Although we are property owners within 300 feet of the proposed site,we did NOT receive notification of this proposal. Our address is 14269 N. Greenspun Pl. We heard about, and received a copy of your letter,via a neighbor. To say the least we are most definitely OPPOSED to this construction. We purchased our home in August of 2000 after looking at many many other properties in Sun City Vistoso. One of the primary reasons for our decision was"privacy". The rear of our property is devoid of any structures,unlike many other homes in the area which abut to neighboring properties. This has been our first year in our new h om e and we have thoroughly enjoyed the flora and fauna afforded by the openess of the backyard. To allow the above structure to be built will not only take awa Our o mciit but will most definitely reduce the value in theproperty. Y .i y y We understand that AT&T has attempted this construction before,but were denied. Because: 1)we were not directly informed about the proposal until April 7th 2)have not had the opportunity to obtain and review all past data (newspaper articles,correspondence, etc.) 3)are presently in the process of returning to our home in Seattle the timing for comments is extremely short and,perhaps a bit suspect,knowing most residents affected return to their homes in the April timeframe. For these reasons,we respectfully request the tabling of any action on this proposal until November. We are requesting an "open hearing"to be scheduled at that time. We do NOT agree that this proposal should be"administratively approved". in the meantime we would appreciate your providing the following further information: -Was an environmental impact statement filed? What are the dimensions the structure, including materials used. What are t!i\..exact dimensions ofthe including height and materials to be -What will the ingress/egress to the structure be? - Drawings,materials, etc. of the pole addition. - What other locations are or\vill be concirlererl shot:I-1 this like the other proposal be Aenieci? What other Ii1�.6i11 Vl1J are V■ \vill be�VlfJl\.a\.1��.1 JIIVLI!\..l LI+1J� 11�\�the V<)1�1 proposal,4" VL �lif� . -Who owns the property on which the building is to be constructed? 1 - Has the BoardIU U4 Directors UI JU. City Vistoso been 11fU. 0LLa!of this proposal? PlPlease the above information, it after April 23rd 2507 W. Montlake Pl. E. Seattle,W ease send the t.1VV►�r ifI l is after `..✓f .►� to �+✓V/ 1 i i�i11�f4►I1L 1 +. V. �t.f 1 98112, We look forward to hearing from you and will most definitely write further when we have more iir'V1ia+lV1. Thank YUU ror the opportunity to give ou UUI ;V1 .- c1+J. :V .0 will most defini1CI.Y.send VU'U fill - i 1_ i{_ ..•� �.z....+ oUt il.11 LIIGI 11111U1=1IL UIJUll 1 GIiCIVI Ui YUUI Illltll iiiai ioii Cull! llli! iii!Llicl !11 VCJL1I aLIU11. ` d APR 1 7 ZUUI April 12,2001 Y` Ms. Sangeeta Jain Town of Oro Valley Community Development Department 11000 N.La Canada Drive Oro Valley, AZ 85737 Dear Ms. Jain: I am currently on an extended trip to Florida and expect to return April 19. My neighbor contacted me with the disturbing news that Oro Valley Planning is once again considering allowing ATT to build a microwave facility adjacent to my back yard. This plan which was once rejected by the Sun City Governing Board as not being appropriate to the area,was also rejected by Oro Valley on grounds that the land was on a WAPA easement extending 100'under the power line. Now the matter has again come up for consideration. Mr. Carroll, my neighbor,is in contact with you concerning the legal ramifications concerning this location. I feel it my position to inform you as a tax paying resident of Oro Valley how repellent such a facility would be abutting our back yards. Not only would it be a noise and visual problem, we feel it would very negatively impact on the value of our homes in the event we should decide to sell. I have taken numerous pictures of other buildings they have constructed for this installation and find them totally unsatisfactory to the design and ambiance of our neighborhood. While there is much land in the Vistoso Partner's area,they chose to back up their installation to my yard. There is much open space up and down the WAPA line that it seems they have not considered, opting instead for their stubborn insistence on this one site. There are other areas, fire stations, storage tank areas,etc. which abound in Rancho Vistoso which, it would seem, an adequate engineering survey would find entirely satisfactory,but no,they insist on this one site. I object to the location of this commercial facility literally in my back yard. It is a noise and visual eyesore. My neighbors feel the same as attested to by a petition to that effect presented to the Sun City Board.We are prepared to present additional evidence, as you require. Consider us your neighbors. We have common interests, common desires for the appearance and ambiance of our community. Reject the intrusion of big moneyed corporations unless their propositions are reasonable.Reject their petition. Sincerely, , 96)/We7 • _op Donald P. Horst ,f. 0176.7 -O/-� April 15, 2001 Ms. Sangeeta JainCO;L _ --- g:' Town of Oro Valle Y Community Development DepartmentLa .� 11000 N. La Canada Drive °PR ��U Oro Valley, AZ 85737 BY : Dear Ms. Jain: This is in reply to your letter of April 3, 2001 regarding OV06-01-01, AT&T Minor Telecommunication Facility. Three homes on Greenspun Place are principally affected by this proposal: my own (address above), Mr. Horst's at 14263, and Mr. & Mrs. Webbs, at 14269. Our homes are all constructed with great room and master bedroom at the rear of the house, facing west towards the proposed facility, with a rear patio. As the proposal indicates, our west property line is 126 feet from the east wall of the proposed facility. Our homes are located approximately 30-35'from our west property line. The proximity of our homes to the proposed facility is conveniently ignored by the technically correct site plans, which map only property of The Estates at Honeybee Ridge. Our homes are approximately the same distance from the proposed facility as the WAPA pole it will serve. But our homes are"off the map" both literally, in the sense of not being shown in the plans, and figuratively, in that their existence has not been taken into account in the planning. Apart from our personal interests, we also feel that the proposal to heighten a utility pole adjacent to Rancho Vistoso Boulevard and to build a telecommunication facility adjacent to Open Space are contrary to the Town's interests in preserving and beautifying Oro Valley. We object to the construction of a telecommunications facility at this location. The following pages detail our objections and questions. In outline they are: 1) Reasons why the proposal cannot be approved in its present form: • Application requirements have not been satisfied. • Proposed utility pole modification does not conform to code. 2) Objections to the substance of the proposal: • To the choice of this particular WAPA pole. • To the proposed location of the facility. • To the proposed location of A/C equipment. 3) Questions regarding: • Visibility. • Noise. • Lighting. • Vehicular access. • Utility easement. • Emergency generator. • Drainage. • Collocation and other future plans. Neighborhood meeting: You have already indicated your intention to schedule a neighborhood meeting, as provided for in the Town Code. We welcome the opportunity to discuss this matter, especially because it's full of technical and legal complications not easily understood. There is however the following difficulty. When your letter was sent on 4/3, Mr. Horst was already on vacation in Florida; he will return 4/19. I already had a business trip scheduled; I depart 4/18 and return 4/22. Mr. & Mrs. Webb had already planned their return to Seattle for the summer; the last day they are available this spring is 4/23. So Monday April 23, 2001, is the only date available in the near future when all interested parties can attend. Mr. Horst has agreed to host the meeting at his home, and I am willing to take time off from work to participate. If however the meeting cannot be scheduled for that date, we respectfully request that it be postponed until Mr. & Mrs. Webb return in the fall. I argue below both that the application is incomplete, and that the proposal as submitted does not conform to Oro Valley ordinances. If either of those views is correct, there does not seem to be a need for a meeting at this time. Manner of approval: Your letter mentions that the proposal can be approved administratively. Last spring AT&T Wireless Services and Estates at Honeybee Ridge submitted a similar proposal, which required a public hearing. Last week I asked you on the phone whether the manner of approval had changed because of a change in substance of the proposal. You replied that no, the manner of approval had changed principally because the Oro Valley Zoning Code had been revised in the interim, in February of this year. The new code does not require an administrative decision. It says in part: "The Planning and Zoning Administrator may elect to make a determination on a Tier I application or forward to the Development Review Board for consideration" [emphasis added]. This is substantially the same proposal that was made last spring (same parties, same WAPA pole). That proposal could not have been decided administratively. Therefore we respectfully request that this year's version also not be decided administratively. We feel that this is more fair to the homeowners affected, and also better for the Town of Oro Valley, which otherwise runs the risk of appearing to have revised the code in order to ease procedures for business interests by avoiding public discussion. Summary of requests: • Neighborhood meeting 4/21/01 or in the fall. • No administrative approval. • Various other specific requests as detailed in the following pages. Respectfully submitted, /01-4 Michael Carroll Comments on OV06-01-01 Page 2 of 9 1) Reasons why the proposal cannot be approved in its present form: • Application requirements have not been satisfied. I visited the Community Development Services office and inspected the file for OV06-01-01 on Thursday afternoon April 12, 2001. Judy showed it to me. I had been informed that you would be out the entire week, from Monday April 9 through Friday April 13 inclusive, or I would have visited when you could have shown me the file. In the file at that time I found a memo regarding the Environmental Assessment. It says in part that the Environmental Assessment will be available from ATC Associates in Tempe, and that the "Report should be available after 4/25/01" [emphasis added]. It appears that an Environmental Assessment is required by Item 12.h (4) of Chapter 9 of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised 02/01 ("OVZCR0201"), as part of the application. If in fact it is required and will not be available until after 4/25/01 as stated, then the application is incomplete, and cannot be approved in its present form. I also did not find a separate document satisfying Item 12.h generally, for example: 12.h (6), status of FCC facility and site approval, or 12.h (7), updated Provider's Communication Plan. These also appear to be required application components that are currently missing. Request: Please state whether you believe the application to be complete. If the application is incomplete, please clarify whether property owners are expected to review and comment on an incomplete application. • Proposed utility pole modification does not conform to code. The existing WAPA pole which AT&T Wireless Services ("ATTWS") proposes to modify is just under 56'tall, according to the submitted Zoning Site Plan and Elevation, Sheet Number Z1. ATTWS proposes to make the pole six feet taller, adding an antenna. This increases the height of the pole by approximately 10%. A cursory reading of OVZCR0201 suggests that an existing pole may be made 20%taller, and that therefore a 10% increase is allowed. This interpretation is not accurate. The item in question, on page 9-47, states: "(b)The height of the utility poles, communication facilities, or other existing structures shall not add more than 20%to the original height up to a maximum of eighty(80) feet or the regulated height of the utility poles, communication facilities, or other existing structures, whichever is less"[emphasis added]. The modified pole would not exceed 80 feet, and the increase does not exceed 20%. But the code also requires that the modified pole shall not exceed "the regulated height"of the existing pole. What is the regulated height of the WAPA pole? The WAPA pole in question is located not only in the Town of Oro Valley but also in the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development (PAD). The Rancho Vistoso PAD has requirements that are more restrictive than the Town ordinances, but have the same force as Town ordinances. This is no mere technical quibble. Those of us who chose to live in Rancho Vistoso did so in part because the idea of living in a planned community appealed to us. We also were willing to pay Comments on OV06-01-01 Page 3 of 9 h more for our homes, for the privilege of living in a planned community. We expect the provisions of the PAD to be honored. P p ons The Rancho Vistoso PAD development plan states that communicationoles shall not forty (40)feet in height. The WAPApole is tallerp exceed e it predated the adoption than this only because of the Rancho Vistoso PAD, and was"grandfathered"in. The "regulated height"of the WAPA pole mentioned in the proposal is therefore 40 feet. The ordinance does not permit an existing pole to be raised above its regulated height. Therefore pole violates Towng g the proposed change to the ordinances. This point may be clarified by means of an example. Suppose an existingpole 35 feet The 20% allowance would permit a 7-foot increase, were tall. but the regulated height restriction would only allow a 5-foot increase, not a 7-foot one. The idea that a 35 foot pole may only be extended 5 feet because of the regulated height restriction, while a 50 footole, which already the limit, may be extended 10 feet, is patently absurdp exceeds absurd. Request: If you or other planning officials do not agree with this interpretation of the proposal, p posal, the ordinances, and the implications of the ordinances for the proposal, l respectfully request awritten reply, not an oral one, explaining where my interpretation goes wrong and why the proposed modification is permitted. Comments on 0V06-01-01 Pae 4 g of 9 2) Objections to the substance of the proposal: • To the choice of this particular WAPA pole. The proposal selects one particular Western Area Power Administration ("WAPA") pole for a telecommunications antenna. It was selected in part because it satisfies ATTWS's technical requirement for an antenna of a certain height within a certain geographical area. Is this a good choice, from the point of view of the Town of Oro Valley? Is it the only available choice? The pole in question is conspicuously located near Rancho Vistoso Boulevard, on a small rise on the outside of a curve in the road just as you enter or leave Sun City Vistoso. The poles do not follow the boulevard; the power line crosses it at this location. The pole in question is probably the single most conspicuous pole on the whole line. The WAPA lines are the only aboveground utility lines in the area. Rancho Vistoso Boulevard is a scenic route through Oro Valley. It would make more sense to be talking to WAPA about the possibility of burying the power lines where they cross the boulevard and taking down the pole altogether, to reduce visual blight that preceded the development of Rancho Vistoso. From the point of view of the Town of Oro Valley, this is not a good choice of a pole to make taller by puffing an antenna on top. Is it the only available choice? No, it is not. The next pole to the north on the WAPA line is an acceptable alternative, according to ATTWS engineers. The Tynan Group had informal discussions with a resident of Greenspun Place last year, concerning the possibility of using that pole instead. This second pole is the same height as the first, but its top is at a higher elevation, because its base is higher. It has EHBR Common Area land adjacent to it, including an area that has already been cleared, and appears to have been used as a road. The proposal does not explain why the first pole was selected rather than the second. Are the two WAPA poles the only available sites within the geographical area in which ATTWS wants an antenna? No, they are not. ATTWS proposed last summer and fall to the Sun City Vistoso Board of Directors the possibility of putting an antenna in the Sun City clock tower. Jim Haney, a member of the Board, expressed disappointment at a public meeting on Thursday 4/12/01, upon hearing of the EHBR proposal. He supports the ATTWS proposal for Sun City, and would like Sun City to have the revenue that the facility would provide. ATTWS appears to have shelved this alternative in spite of the absence of any technical obstacles. The clock tower is also more attractive than the currently proposed site, from the point of view of planned development, in that it has adjacent non-residential areas where the required telecommunication facility could be located. Request: We respectfully suggest that due to its conspicuous location, the Town should consider the WAPA pole identified in the current proposal to be a"pole of last resort."We recommend that any proposal to use that particular pole be denied unless ATTWS (or any other utility) can show that all practical alternatives, including the two mentioned above, have already been fully explored. • To the proposed location of the facility. EHBR has common areas on both sides of Quiet Rain Drive at the intersection with Rancho Vistoso Boulevard. As you go up Quiet Rain, there is a common area on the left or west side, where there are already telephone and electrical boxes, as shown in proposal sheet Z1, Zoning Site and Plan Elevation. On the right or east side, the other common area is bifurcated by the Comments on 0V06-01-01 Page 5 of 9 paved road or driveway that runs up to the dirt road along the WAPA easement. The WAPA pole that ATTWS proposes to modify is to the south of the driveway. The site for the proposed facility is to the north. Of the three pieces of EHBR Common Area available, EHBR and ATTWS appear to have selected the one that is closest to the greatest number of Sun City Vistoso residences. Why was this piece of Common Area chosen, rather than one of the other two? The proposal mentions that the selected site was"previously disturbed."While true, this does not seem to be a particularly good reason for selecting it. It was disturbed at least five years ago, and has had over three years to recover. Nothing has been located there since I first saw the site in April 1998. The most natural place to put the facility would seem to be as close to the pole as possible. This location is probably inappropriate because the facility could not be hidden easily. It would be conspicuously visible from Rancho Vistoso Boulevard, like the pole itself. But it is not clear why the third alternative, on the west side of Quiet Rain Drive, was rejected. There are already equipment boxes there, as previously mentioned. It is no farther from the pole than the proposed location. And it is not in proximity to any existing homes or to any sites where homes are to be built. Request: We respectfully recommend that the proposed site not be approved without an explanation as to why the west side of Quiet Rain Drive is not more suitable. • To the proposed location of A/C equipment. The proposal includes sheet number Z2, entitled"Zoning Site Detail and Elevations." Figure 1, "Lease Site Detail,"shows that the air conditioning (A/C) units are to be located on the east side of the building, facing in the direction of our homes on Greenspun Place. The east wall on which they are to be located is approximately 150 feet from our master bedrooms. The EHBR land on the west side of Quiet Rain Drive, opposite the proposed facility, is a Common Area. It is not platted for a residence. The nearest residence west of the proposed facility is not on Quiet Rain but on the next street to the west, and is protected by a ridge. The nearest lot to the northwest is considerably farther north, at the intersection of Quiet Rain and Cool Mist. There are no lots to the south, on either side of Quiet Rain. So there are no nearby homes or home sites in EHBR that would be bothered by noise from the NC units, if they were positioned on the west side of the facility rather than the east. Why are the proposed air conditioning units facing existing homes nearby? --Apparently because our homes on Greenspun are off the map, and are of no concern to those who drew up the proposal. Request: We request that the plans be modified to situate the proposed A/C units on the western side of the facility, to minimize noise pollution. Comments on OV06-01-01 Page 6 of 9 3) Questions regarding: • Visibility. One of our principal concerns is whether the facility would be visible from our great rooms and patios. It is entirely possible that the facility as planned already meets this concern. However, it is difficult to determine whether it does, since one must take into account: • The height of the building; • The elevation of its base; • The distance from our homes; • The elevation of the intervening area; • The elevation of our yards. (The three homes principally affected have yards at different elevations.) We do not wish to find out whether it will be visible by waiting for it to be built. Request: If the facility is to be located as proposed, we respectfully request that the Town or EHBR or ATTVVS install four temporary poles at the locations of the four corners of the building. The poles should then be marked to indicate the height of the building at each location. This will assist us in determining whether the facility will be visible from various locations on our property. • Noise. A second principal concern is whether equipment at the facility would be audible from our patios and master bedrooms. OVZCR0201 apparently does not specify any criteria for acceptable noise level. The proposal shows two A/C units, but does not discuss the noise generated by the NC or by any other equipment. The facility is to be located in the desert, not in an urban area. What we hear most often from our patios and bedrooms in the evening are birds, insects, and coyotes. A noise level that might be acceptable elsewhere is likely to be totally unacceptable here. Request: We would like to be informed as to whether the two A/C units will always, sometimes, or never operate simultaneously. We would like to know if a thermostat in the building operates the units, and if so what temperature they are intended to maintain. We would like to know approximately how often and for how long they will run, and at what seasons of the year. We would like to know whether there is any other equipment, for heating or ventilation or any other purpose, that will make any noise, and if so, how much. • Vehicular access. Proposal sheet Z1, Zoning Site Plan and Elevation, shows a dirt road in the WAPA easement_ Though not explicitly stated anywhere, it appears that ATTWS expects to access the proposed facility via this dirt road. Their right to use this road is not discussed anywhere in the proposal. Opinion as to who has the right to use this road is divided. One well-informed Town Planning Department employee believes it is only off-limits to all-terrain vehicles(ATVs). Another suggested ATTWS has the right to use it because WAPA does. Ms. Hope of LMR believes it Comments on OV06-01-01 Page 7 of 9 may not be used by any motor vehicles at all other than those belonging to utility companies, and says LMR has plans to install some sort of gate on the road to enforce that view. If you walk (or drive) south down the dirt road from unincorporated Pima County, you encounter a sign at the Oro Valley town limit, which seems to say that all motor vehicles are prohibited. In addition, the map for the Rancho Vistoso PAD indicates that there is Open Space along the WAPA easement. We believe the dirt road is in the Open Space. We also believe that a hiking trail is planned for the dirt road/open space area, as part of an Oro Valley plan for a system of trails. Request: We respectfully submit that if the dirt road is in Open Space and has a hiking trail planned for it, then EHBR and ATTWS should be required to provide vehicular access to the proposed site from Quiet Rain Drive. In any case, we feel that the right of ATTWS to use the road requires clarification. • Lighting. OVZCR0201 specifies requirements for exterior lighting(page 9-43). The proposal does not seem to mention any exterior lighting. Request: We do not wish to have the structure illuminated at night. We would like to know whether no exterior lighting is planned, or whether it simply is not described in the proposal. If exterior lighting is planned, we would like to know at what times and for how long it is normally expected to be used, as well as whether it conforms to the ordinance. • Emergency generator. Proposal sheet Z1, "Zoning Site Plan and Elevation", shows an"Emergency Generator Roadway."There is no further discussion of the emergency generator and its roadway in the proposal. The ATTWS telecommunication facility on Golder Ranch Road in Catalina had an emergency generator stored on site the last time I visited it. Request: We would like to know whether the emergency generator is expected to be stored on site as in Catalina, or only moved in when needed. While the nature of emergencies is that they're unpredictable, we would nevertheless like to have some information from ATTWS regarding how often on average emergency generators have actually had to be operated at similar facilities. We would also like to know whether the roadway for the emergency generator is to be paved; this is not clear from the proposal. • Utility easement. Proposal sheet C-1, "Topographic Survey", shows two 10' utility easements, marked L13 and L14 in the diagram. These easements connect the WAPA pole and the proposed telecommunication facility. There is no further discussion in the proposal of what they are for. Request: We would like to understand the purpose of the utility easements and how the pole and facility will be connected. We assume that this is via wiring that will be buried, but this is not asserted anywhere in the proposal; other possibilities are wireless, and aboveground wires. If burying the wires will require digging trenches, we would like to know if this would require plants to be moved which are not identified in the proposal's Native Plant Inventory. Comments on OV06-01-01 Page 8 of 9 • Drainage. The land for the facility will need to be graded. This has the potential to alter the flow of rainwater. The proposal does not discuss drainage from the facility area. Request: We would like to have more information on the expected impact of the facility on drainage, and in particular to be reassured that it will not cause rainwater to drain towards our property rather than towards Quiet Rain Drive. • Collocation and other future plans. QVZCR0201 mentions "unlimited collocations on all existing facilities"as a requirement in its discussion of Tier I Minor Facilities, page 9-47. The intent of this requirement is unclear. Request: We would like to understand whether and to what extent the approval of this proposal is likely to lead to future expansion of the use of the pole and the facility, whether by ATTWS or by other telecommunication providers. Comments on OV06-01-01 Page 9 of 9 Page 1 of 4 Vella, Bayer From: Monte Webb [ Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 11:48 AM To: Nodine, Bryant; Mike Carroll Cc: Don Horst; John Bolt; Vella, Bayer; Jain, Sangeeta Subject: Re: Rancho Vistoso PAD & utility pole height restrictions Mr. Nodine: Having read and re-read the E-Mail from Michael Carroll, Sangeeta Jain and yourself, it appears Oro Valley Planning and Zoning is doing whatever AT&T requests WITHOUT regard for the neighbors. We understand that 1) poles were placed at the proposed site outling the equipment building, 2) a meeting was held at the site, and 3) the suggestion was made to reduce the height, and 4) further information would be provided to all involved. Unfortunately we could not attend as we are now back in Seattle. Please make sure we are kept abreast of all action on this proposal. We would also request: 1) A written response to the issues addressed in our letter to Sangeeta dated 4/11/01. To date we have had no response. 2) A written response addressing ALL the issues addressed in Michael Carroll's memo dated 4/15/01. While one of the issues was addressed, there are many remaining. 3) A written response from AT&T addressing the issue of other site locations as discussed in the 4/23/01 meeting. As we recall, other sites were to be investigated for example, the Fire Station, the small commercail mall, and other COMMERCIAL sites. Upon this further investigation all parties in attendence were to receive information as to the pros and cons of ALL sites. We remain deeply concerned with the actions taken by Oro Valley Planning and Zoning and most definitely are opposed to the site as listed/shown in OV06-01-01. Monte and Sue Webb Original Message From: Nodine, Bryant Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 8:04 AM To: 'Michael Carroll' Cc: Monte & Sue Webb; Don Horst; John Bolt; Nodine, Bryant; Vella, Bayer; Jain, Sangeeta Subject: RE: Rancho Vistoso PAD & utility pole height restrictions Mr. Carroll, To clear up an obvious misunderstanding: The scriveners error I was referring to was the change of the Code to allow communication facilities in open space. Two years ago, when the Parks and Open Space zoning district was created it did not include communications 6/6/01 Page 2 of 4 facilities as a permitted use. This was not a conscious decision; it was an omission--every other zoning district allowed communication facilities. AT&T therefore asked that we revise the Code to allow communication facilities in open space. We initiated the rest of the changes in the Code based on problems we had encountered reviewing other communication facilities. We did increase the I allowable heights, but not at the request of AT&T. We did this because the lower height limits did not allow collocation on many existing facilities (utility poles, light poles, etc.) and we believe that the Town's best interests are served by collocation on existing poles rather than new poles. We put limits on changes to the heights of existing poles and we required higher levels of public review the more height that is proposed to be added. We also increased the opportunities for public involvement by requiring direct notification of surrounding property owners rather than just the HOA. These changes meet the community's needs for wireless communication service while ensuring that concerns of effected neighbors are heard. Original Message From: Michael Carroll [mailto: Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 7:40 PM To: Jain, Sangeeta Cc: Monte & Sue Webb; Don Horst; John Bolt; Nodine, Bryant; Vella, Bayer Subject: Rancho Vistoso PAD & utility pole height restrictions Sangeeta, Thanks for the clarification. So I was correct in thinking there had been some sort of restriction on the height of utility poles. But I was mistaken in thinking that the restriction was stated in the Rancho Vistoso PAD. Instead, the height restriction was in the old communications facility code. Now the code has been revised. And under the new code, a minor facility can have a taller pole than what was allowed for a major facility in the old code. And the code was revised at AT&T's request. And Mr. Nodine describes this change as due to a "scrivener's error". I think I am beginning to understand Oro Valley Planning and Zoning. Michael Carroll mcarroll@pobox.com. Original Message From: "Jain, Sangeeta" <sjain@orovalley.net> To: "'Michael Carroll" < Cc: "Vella, Bayer" <bvella@orovalley.net> Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 11:18 AM Subject: RE: > Hello Mr. Carroll: 6/6/01 Page 3 of 4 > > The Rancho Vistoso PAD does not specify height restriction on WAPA poles. > As a brief history, > Last year for the same proposal, AT&T had requested a variance to increase > the height of the WAPA pole to install an antenna on top. That was ' done > because the proposal was considered a major communication facility at that > time under the old communications facility code. And the maximum height for > a major communication facility was 50' under the old code in R1-144 zoning > district. But the variance request was pulled from the agenda because a > communication facility was neither allowed as a permitted nor as a > conditional use in the parks and open space zoning district. > Hope this helps to clarify your thinking otherwise. let me know if you have > any other questions. thanks for the updated list of homeowners. > Sangeeta > Original Message > From: Michael Carroll [ > Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 5:26 PM > To: Vella, Bayer > Cc: John Bolt; Jain, Sangeeta > Subject: > Bayer, > I would really appreciate it if you or Sangeeta would check into whether > the Rancho Vistoso PAD specifies a height limit for utility poles. I'd > do it myself but I would have to either take time off from work or pay > over $50 to get a full copy including amendments. > I have a very specific reason for thinking that there is a limit. In > the summer of last year, before the Town decided that the code for > telecommunications facilities needed rewriting, I received a letter > (from Sangeeta, I think, or maybe Dee Widero). It announced a > Development Review Board meeting regarding adding to the WAPA pole, the > same one that's currently proposed. It specifically concerned the pole > and not the facility. It said that a meeting was required, if I > remember correctly, because the pole was already taller than what the > Rancho Vistoso PAD allowed. So raising it required DRB approval (or > maybe it was the Board of Adjustment). The meeting was canceled when it 6/6/01 Page 4 of 4 > was decided that the current zoning didn't allow the facility to be > built. > So that's why I believe there's a height restriction. (I tried to call > you today, but didn't catch you in the office.) > Thanks for looking into this. > Michael > -- > Michael Carroll > mcarroll@pobox.com Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com 6/6/01 MINUTES OF THE ORO VALLEY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING TUESDAY JUNE 12, 2001 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11,000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE REGULAR MEETING CALL TO ORDER:. 6:40 p.m. DRAFT ROLL CALL: Present Jim Vogelsberg, Chair Jeff Weatherford, Member Barbara Bell, Member Nancy Mager, Member Absent Vincent Baiocchetti, Member truce Enger, Vice Chair ;hard Underwood, Member Others Present: Bayer Vella, Senior Planner David Ronquillo, Planner I Judy Imhoff, Planner Craig Civalier, Engineer Shirley Gay, DRB Clerk Lisa Bellah, Secretary II APPROVAL OF MAY 8, 2001 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MINUTES Chair Vogelsberg asked if any amendments were needed. Hearing no response, the minutes were g g approved. CONSENT AGENDA A. OV13-01-25, ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF HIGHBERGER CUSTOM HOME, LOT 8, PARCEL 2201 40080, OF THE LA RESERVE PAD,LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF NORTH LA RESERVE DRIVE AND CORODERA CANYON PLACE This is a request for architectural review of a 5,420 square feet custom home on Lot#8. The buildable portion of Lot#8 is approximately 46,051 square feet in size. MOTION: Moved, seconded (Bell/Weatherford) and carried by a 4-0 vote 06-12-01 Development Review Board Minutes Page 2 ‘Aiaiocchetti/Enger/Underwood absent)to approve Consent Item A. REGULAR AGENDA 1. OV6-01-01, AT& T WIRELESS PCS TIER I MINOR COMMUNICATION FACILITY LOCATED IN THE COMMON AREA OF ESTATES OF HONEY BEE CANYON AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD AND QUITE RAIN DRIVE Mr. Vella introduced the staff report into the record. Staff recommended approval subject to conditions in Exhibit A. Member Mager questioned item number two under the Conditions of Approval (under no circumstances may an emergency generator be audible from adjacent residential properties), inquiring as to how this will be enforced, and if something can be done if a neighbor reports the noise. Mr. Vella indicated that item two can be enforced; the applicant would be cited for using the wrong kind of generator. Zoning Enforcement staff would go out to the site when the generator was running and cite the property owner. If the use of the wrong generator were to continue, the court would be asked to levy a monetary fine. Member Mager asked if there was an ultimate action, such as taking it down if the violation continued. Mr. Vella stated that the way the conditions are structured, the applicant could be denied the use. If the applicant continues to violate a condition of approval, the Town can void the approval,thereby ending use. Member Bell questioned if the variance option had been explored, and to what extent. Mr. Vella stated that Planning and Zoning strongly discourages folks from pursuing variances in order to uphold the integrity of the Town's code. The applicant pursued other design solutions by lowering the building 16 inches and doubling the quantity of landscaping on all four sides of the building. Member Bell's main concern is the noise, asking what is an acceptable range. Mr. Vella explained that the closest houses were 100 feet away. He asked member Bell to imagine that she was in her own backyard and the neighbor's air conditioner(average residential unit) 100 feet away kicked on. Chair Vogelsberg expressed concern over the pole. He questioned, when driving up Rancho Vistoso, if his attention would be drawn to it because it is inherently different than the other telephone poles. Mr. Vella stated that the 6' cylindrical extension would be painted the same color as the existing pole. Chair Vogelsberg asked about protrusions from the pole. Mr. Vella stated that it would be as advertised—a sleek shaft with absolutely no protrusions from the left or right. Additional antennas or protrusions from the existing antenna will need to be reviewed on a case by case basis. "6-12-01 Development Review Board Minutes Page 3 Chair Vogelsberg questioned the elevations of the building. Mr. Vella informed Chair Vogelsberg that the applicant has a PowerPoint presentation with shots of each elevation. Martha Keunhold of AT & T Wireless addressed the board. She stated that she has been looking for a facility site for Rancho Vistoso Sun City for about a year. She briefly explained why a carrier would come forward with a proposal for a new facility, and took members through a slide presentation of the area and building structure. Chair Vogelsberg questioned the elevation of houses in comparison to the structure. Ms. Keunhold indicated the houses were lower, but by how much, she did not know. Homeowners would be looking up toward the structure rather than down on it. Ms. Keunhold addressed the issue of the generators, stating that there are batteries within each facility that will power the site for two to four hours in the event of a power failure. She also discussed the reasons for not vaulting the building, and stated that the air-conditioning units that will be used are 4-ton units, which are comparable, if not quieter than the units that have been surveyed in the adjacent homes. Ms. Keunhold informed members that this site, as designed, meets all the general requirements. Member Bell questioned the kind of service required, and how often. Ms Keunhold stated that a technician would come out to the site once a month for routine maintenance. Member Bell also asked about venting of the building, to which Ms. Keunhold explained that there would be venting much the same as with a house. Chair Vogelsberg explained that the noise was one of his concerns. Ms. Keunhold stated that the g g roofline of the shelter was level with the WAPA Easement. She noted that there were clearer elevations in the packet. Michael Carroll, 14257 N. Greenspun Place, expressed his concern about there being a building rather than putting it underground. He stated that it should be underground to preserve the wildlife in the area. He indicated that there should not be a building, noting that the applicant has not given adequate reasons for there being a building rather than undergrounding it. He respectfully requests that the Board recheck the proposal as it stands and require that the possibility of vaulting be reconsidered. Don Horst, 14263 N. Greenspun Place, is strongly opposed to the site because of the noise, however, his main objection is the "foot in the door" factor. Once the building is built, additional buildings may be necessary as technology changes; there will be no stopping it because they have.a"foot in the door". John Bolt, 730 E. Cool Mist Drive, stated that he has not had any problem using his AT & T phone in the area. He questioned how the Board sees their role in this situation; he thinks the role of the Board is not to uglify the Town of Oro Valley. Mr. Bolt stated that he is opposed to '-12-01 Development Review Board Minutes Page 4 the site because the pole is in his viewline of the Catalina's, and the noise from the air conditioners. Mr. Bolt questions why AT & T needs this particular location, stating that no one has answered that for him or any of the other homeowners in the area. Mr. Bolt also expressed concern that not all homeowners in Honey Bee Ridge were notified of the meetings. Once this site is done, it is done; it will never be changed. Antennas do not belong in residential neighborhoods. Bill Adler, 10720 N. Eagle Eye Place, stated that a request for variance was not an end run around the zoningcode, a variance request is a legitimate right to any applicant and it is provided for, and there are steps and provisions to conduct a hearing on variance requests. It should in no way be insinuated that it is inappropriate to seek a variance to setback requirements. The report indicates that omitting communications facilities from open space was not a conscience decision. Mr. Adler disagrees, stating that it was a conscience decision because he in it. The general plan indicates that open space is a designation of an area that is to participated be precluded from development except for public recreational facilities and nature preserves, so this suggestion is contradictory or not in compliance with the general plan although the staff report indicates there is general plan compliance. The plan indicates that this service is a public service. Unless the Town intends to enter into an agreement with AT& T and provide service to the community as a public service, this is not a public service. Section 4.5.3 of the general plan, which covers issues as they relate to this matter, does not list communication services as a community issue that needs to be addressed by the general plan; so there is no compliance with the general plan, it fails to comply with the policy 6.2G, which talks about enhancing and preserving natural open space. Mr. Adler stated that he does not believe this land has been disturbed. Dick Maes, 955 W. Vistoso Highlands Drive, indicated that he was not here in support or disagreement of the antenna. He is here to establish the need for this type of facility within Rancho Vistoso. Chair Vogelsberg asked the applicant if she wanted to offer clarification of any of the issues that have been addressed. Ms. Keunhold stated that many other sites had been explored with problems being at each one. As an example, the clock tower at Sun City. It had the height,but no adequate space to put the equipment. AT & T is very conscience of making sure that when they build a site that it is planned for future expansion. This pole was identified for the height, a willing landlord, and it met all the zoning requirements. She asked members to refer to the coverage maps in their packet, as it will give them an idea of what type of range this type of facility would fill in. Member Bell asked if these maps were made available to the homeowners. Ms. Keunhold stated that"yes"homeowners were given these maps. Chair Vogelsberg asked if the willing landlord was present. Ms. Keunhold informed members that he was not present. '-12-01 Development Review Board Minutes Page 5 Member Weatherford expressed concern that there is no guarantee that this site will not have to be expanded for future growth. Ms. Keunhold stated that space within the shelter would accommodate a change of equipment without any external change at all. Chair Vogelsberg asked if the equipment needs will be increasing or getting smaller. An AT & T g g engineer stated that the trend is moving toward being smaller. Member Bell questioned an area of coverage on map #3 where nothing was listed. Ms. Kuenhold asked her RF Engineer to answer this question. MOTION: Moved, seconded (Mager/Weatherford) and carried by a 4-0 vote (BaiocchettilEngerlUnderwood absent)to deny OV6-01-01. Chair Vogelsberg called a 5-minute recess. Meeting resumed at 8:45 p.m. 2. OV12-00-05,REVIEW OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 7 PARCEL A, LOCATED SOUTH AND ADJACENT TO MOORE ROAD, WEST AND ADJACENT TO HIGHLANDS WASH, AND EAST OF VISTOSO RIDGE SUBDIVISION. Mr. Vella introduced the staff report into the record. Staff recommended approval subject to conditions in Exhibit A, removing condition 2. Chair Vogelsberg confirmed that a number of concessions had been made over three months, noting that the only thing that is changing is the consultants. Charles Hulsey of WLB Group, representing the applicant, stated that he also thought it was a year that you had to move on with the final plat. He reported that he is essentially processing the same map and cover sheet to wrap up the project. Chair Vogelsberg asked about an additional condition that was added. It was clarified that condition number 2 under Exhibit A had been completed and can be removed. MOTION: Moved, seconded (Mager/Bell) and carried by a 4-0 vote (Baiocchetti/EngerlUnderwood absent) to approve OV12-00-05, review of a preliminary plat for Rancho Vistoso neighborhood 7 parcel A, located south and adjacent to Moore Road,west and adjacent to Highlands wash, and east of Vistoso Ridge subdivision. 3. OV13-01-27, ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A CUSTOM HOME BY SYMPHONY HOMES, INC., LOT 4 PARCEL 2243627109, OF THE SUNSTONE ESTATES SUBDIVISION, LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF LINDA VISTA BOULEVARD AND NORTH EGLESTON DRIVE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: August 1,2001 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: David Ronquillo, Planner I SUBJECT: OV12-97-17C, THE WLB GROUP REQUESTS A REPLAT OF LOT 30 IN COPPER RIDGE I (PARCEL #224082070) LOCATED 'h MILE EAST OF LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD AND SOUTH OF TANGERINE ROAD BACKGROUND: Copper Ridge I is located 1/4 mile east of La Cholla Boulevard and south of Tangerine Road. The subdivision is bounded by Tangerine Road on the north, Naranja Ranch on the south, Mira Vista (Ri-b ) to the east and unsubdivided R1-144 to the west. The resubdivision will consists of 1.25 acres with a total of 2 lots The subdivision is within the R1-10 zoning district and the following setbacks apply; front 25', side 10' and rear 25' and a maximum building height of 25. The Final Plat for this subdivision was approved by Town Council on April 1, 1998. -UMMARY: Applicant Request The WLB Group, representing Fairfield Homes, has requested to replat lot 30 of Copper Ridge I into two separate lots. Currently, lot 30 consists of 54,758 square feet, and the split would create lot 50 with 32,2247 sq. feet and lot 51 with 22,510 sq. feet in size. Staff Comments Originally, when platted, lot 30 was designed around an existing residence in the center of the lot; however, the house has been removed allowing the split to be achieved. Currently, there are very few trees and vegetation remaining on the site, because of the location of the previous home. There would be several advantages to permitting this change; first, the reduction of lot size would orient both lots to other properties similar in size with the rest of the subdivision. Second, this change would eliminate the double frontage lot that currently exists on the property. In sum, the lot split complies with the development standards for the R1-10 zoning district and all notes and conditions associated with the previous plat have been included in this plat. RECOMMENDATION: Staff finds that this proposal meets the requirements of the OVZCR and recommends approval. F:\ov\ov12\1997\12-97-17C\TCrpt.doc TOWN OF ORO VALLEY )UNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 2 SUGGESTED MOTION: The Council may wish to consider the following motion; I move to approve OV12-97-17C, replat of Final Plat for lot 30 in Copper Ridge I. ATTACHMENTS: 1. 11"x17" Final Plat 11 _ --- Planning /ening. s• dministrator Community Development Director Town Manager 4.4.Th 1 F:\ov\ov12\1997\12-97-17C\TCrpt.doc 2001 N\195004\RIDGE-I\CRI-FPsublot30.dwg Thu Jul 12 11:13:29 2001 " d q.�xrnnoecnaau+aee'aenxlana'>:A'et P i :(:;, s71 ; w N O m Z r -0,3>i, AzDC? m 2 'T`1I O�cn I 1 D D OZAo20AK07m z m n Z'ip I LLI rnD191 r-71 m,c_.< � � A z�Z -A-91-,f)' I GI o4o voZ � � '� o rnm'�AT.-A mO5 O p�Z ZZ1mlO '''?‘f'''?‘f.9 ZZ r! OcN 4T?�1.� O0 3-'5AOrn gO O DA�znA 4F �r�N mfm1 N.m0 D omiN(�'N % O c_or� AO I Z O� • 7. -r^r'' 0 -' C -Di:'>-. ZDO o c= j' Nn-rPir D� rnm-')fm n�c� CnmCCZpI WNiZ.'��m mIrDk c=OA9Di mArN m) r al f) 1 > mqD D) Z.;°, ngT63;e v 1`-�\---_-- --\§[ii-" zN r nmmrNZ'' m�A 2 ;,. syJ?� ZDZm�lrr- m VT) rn 0 •.N i N 0 �cnWO 2ror m, DOAr�An-Dn G( mA N -<&Yir �am m <g mD a _ D D>O r• .o> <- 9-- 3< 0 °o ' 0f- D I' mZxr Oo-z1 :1.1 Z� ( zg < 220 EE tj I !JI ��orr. DDo m � • • F. i. L 0 P.il,,, Ti,,onD ooD Nr fZ� n DZ� 1 D ', N 003'07' W mmCl A O n + N 00'03'07"W _ ' "( _100.00J`50.00 ?ig)1';'p� o z> RO oo _ 366.86'� z ?7" - MOU117q< \�moom -, A o •o p R1 \ I z.< .Zm D0 -m, L-81.9 5 .,C3 _di \ Nmo >OD D zr-pm 00O ly . 7(> r1 p N O \ GD w8 .. Fi "NA \ 1 lWA 0 ' D O 4ic 5 i3C : �\ \4SF �oD -O3 V D O o CND O s7.4,, 0,,,,,...... O ` O p. � ` \ I 50.0yOC -<W 00.19 100.0'raO ` M"10,8Z.2ONq, \�2S•s�`.mc mo ,q` S \ / -::` `?37;2 F`, r BOOM'5RPWAGE 17J ° �29n>A29 D 0 / 'x 8.Arg- N � ?:,----,2___. fvsN `my o D Do Zr ' 5'd ::', r.C< [2 -91r-FIS ZNI' R� FL . ,1 0 m- TWT 'N 20 I w C v '1 W an `v A O< m o oz� Dm~n .1 N m N , Eibybr- o S 0723'39"W D Ao rZO`1 m w, 219.34 000.01'37"W E r7 AAAA> �- 163.00' i Z V' `. -O AZN2Z �O ol 7 mn151E Z o �` r O+ CA) Y m r- A 0 rnD r ~ e2 X __ f. WI,. Urn OO r* F, rn Ig. 31`i D m2c,-- -,____---- - -,___-- .teN : <n �. t�=D-m1..'j,�.m2% Qr-` / L-- � _--_- W1%,„,,,,,,,,fi''',4 rl -` rbSq. rr s- Giyc"Dooooo oaabn ODA ,� ey �oo� D r tem n�'�z �4_H5.�`_ ,w 4�,' j A.-mo mnn o m i.,),):?°'.r-°, I AD jO cn Z. a :-°-� / V � � m„m ACmOO rn T�0.O' nOco rouAN.tnurm �m-'.- -6;z8�IK p:< II NZ m zx a Q r;, mC7 1 r i--sEr * i4446 AZTZA \ 1 I \ ilrgrVc19-il 0 grONX2E-1::,4, DiDrl*Q m 71 0 rx'� 0 rnD zmA Dm^- o -;r*1 o(D-' 6 r6 o crmil mrn0'- o 61 z cD'-S-- Z m p zo z-- r om�lxmv' o rn Nrn o DA Z)A c 'L'I'c D c A m>q 0 o 0 v D Do zA (p c c0°Aorn z T'=z p '”Q II II _ NOtOA'm 'TI DA F m�E-2, 6,mA om !:.,'. 061<61 O m OA -�2F 6 Z �� N C giricrl -ilO O O0 r-CDA -D ON Z A C r) N0E. (n..ZOp D.. ornD --�1rnDn00 (7 N DV1ZQ Si-i o y n <Z..{>13 "�� D Am ��p Dmf<m Zm og `'3I0 D u, ? LA CHOLLA LVD.a w _ O p.▪ '10 rTlrno Nt/'rnDO rnn�0 D '0 ZD � ���R - fll E:Ac>� c N� ADm-r(zi1AD�iO ZNA= O 0 _��i� D 6 w 4Z §,1:71 A rn ,n mZDmGO '2 -Ip o02 rZp�ZC1 ZA.ZmI O D •rnr v_��r Z ' p,›:_.- f v - �@ vc co w 2 Z •A0ZN 0 9, ----110 rpm ��r'4 Z O -(Z r*7 i;9° >� n L _ >� ^Z O "O O m mD N = O gn Z 0 y o o n 03 r "3'93 5 o .DA, Zot(n,'oc;rc al''''' z TCO �1 MI. q ;1',Jty �+ i>� t`''0 O n omoA J Amcr m....c, o� A rno p i�2 aI I P �w °Rr, A o 042-,8,13,_..111)„ •'•'o rn m-ti z 0 O �-rrZmo swam ao m rno �li oo�ooziAm ��a cmi o� A 78 --1 4 P C�ERCJI�NFT IZ n� I I O p m y SG3mD n w z�Z A D �(p��0 NCS rT1t i OA m D m m Z0 P oN�4 +i 8��' s' rn;�< Z'801'1>O Z n y"� -DZlr NZ,ZDI- «Dm6rn,s8 CZZ a O -., QO r7 `A'Z aQ:4 `'+s �T{d,� Z C rtr L(n"m(7 D DC_.1•,2 AArn Erf4 r''3 A 'i> 4 L �m ((-� � �Nr Z r(� r-*'C3:(n pA O Dp 1m� �j <o A. r'1(+r 'DOHA D Z Z O ,ZDj D Or�*Dp OmrrTlpZ A= A "<D W LLAGERI 4 y�ow a O o C 0 OAgm NADA-' �1p Of,ORAO cs,"-D-I O� - - - - r- 1� rnN D D N O N N w 0 0'�1 R M� � � m�� RAH r z 0 No �oAoc�" n m � LA CANADA DRIVE („ 13 o y,! _O � n -<0 o V,m =•-'1I z m��Am��Z( 006 f. m I N(-8?) -y ti. Z O '2 13330<N'(p m 0 C c� 8A2D:�31 O'pZ 920 r61 V A O� �wrri Zp�W =O�-Ni ZDDAODZN� Dry D II II II 13 (1 N:C w y vl 1 O ppzg9,1' ADO oA OZ1PZ�DZOp oor o YJ V+ n I ~ z z ap �O D Dm rn= hi U ,pis G)rT1 (^ ,!TI80rn 'mD � �r1r gN:..200p5 D OA u 9 y m m 0Ei �• jm 8' � r��z A"� ZZ� m `�" _. 1 Ln ram m O m �O o ---�lop O V �O � mZ ro mZ0 rn - TOWN OF ORO VALLEY OUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: August 1, 2001 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL FROM: Melissa Shaw, AICP, Project Manager SUBJECT: RESOLUTION 0I-7 1DECLARING AS A PUBLIC RECORD AND APPROVING THE FINAL SCOPE OF WORK AND CONSULTANT COST FOR THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE 2001 BACKGROUND: On June 28, 2001, Town Council approved the General Plan Update 2001 Scope of Work, revised the General Plan Public Participation Action Plan (PPAP), and revised the Planning and Zoning Work Plan. p The final action to be taken by Council to fully implement the General Plan Update process is to approve the consultant contract and final Scope of Work. Staff has negotiated the final Scope of Work and cost estimate with BRW, Inc. BRW is a national firm with extensive experience preparing General Plans in Arizona. The project team is familiar with Growing p Smarter requirements. BRW was the prime consulting firm for General Plan updates in Peoria and Pinetop- Lakeside, and a member of the consultant team for Surprise. These three municipalities have successfully updated their plans to meet Growing Smarter requirements and have had these plans ratified by voters. p SUMMARY: Scope of Work. Duringthe negotiation process, the Scope of Work has been refined. The changes that have been made to g the Scope since the Council's last review include minor edits and the following: ➢ Three Technical Reports have been added throughout the process, as per the PPAP. ➢ Task-based status reports have been deleted and replaced by task-based status summaries that will be p submitted with the billing, and background reports that will summarize data collection and analysis. ➢ The effectiveness of the PPAP will be evaluated, summarized and reported by the Consultant on a monthlyby basis the task-based status summaries. Additional evaluation of public involvement will be prepared and reported monthly to the Steering Committee, Planning Commission and Town Council. Cost Estimate. The total estimated cost for the Consultant portion of the General Plan update project is $236,000. The billing will be distributed over FY 2001-2002 and through a portion of FY 2002-2003. Because the majority (mapping)GIS the fofor this project will be produced either directly by Town staff or by a GIS consultant hired to support staff for specific mapping needs, that cost ($17,000) is separately itemized. The overall budget and consultant cost for the project, including the approved budget for FY 2001-2002, is displayed in Table 1. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY JUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 2 Table 1 General Plan GIS Staff,Equipment & Total Budget Consultant Support Supplies FY 2001-2002 213,000 17,000 66,600 296,600 FY 2002-2003* 23,000 - 37,000 60,000 Total $236,000 $17,000' $103,600 $356,600 *estimated A contract between the Town of Oro Valleyand BRW will be prepared by the Town Attorney that is consistent with the approved Final Scope of Work and Consultant cost. RECOMMENDATION: staff recommends approval of the final Scope of Work and Consultant Cost for BRW, Inc. of Planning pp $236,000 for the General Plan Update 2001 and to authorize Town legal staff to prepare a contract consistent with the approved cost and Scope of Work. SUGGESTED MOTION: 11 approve Resolution (R) 0171 , Final Scope of Work and Consultant Cost of $236,000 for the I move to pp Town of Oro ValleyGeneral Plan Update 2001 and authorize Town legal staff to prepare a contract consistent p with the approved cost and Scope of Work. -OR- Ive to approve Resolution (R) 0171 , Final Scope of Work and Consultant Cost of $236,000 for the mo pp Town of Oro Valley General Plan Update 2001, and authorize Town legal staff to prepare a contract consistent with the approved cost and Scope of Work with the following modifications: . -OR- In Resolution (R) 01- Final Sco e of Work and Consultant Cost of$236,000 for the Town move to de y 71, p of Oro Valley General Plan Update 2001, finding that: ' ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution (R) 01 71 / i k 2. Scope of Work '- Pla 7nd Z nl ifro ministrator 7.77,u Community Development Director 1A3( GL.---- --- Town Manager 6(.. ,,..Th F.APROJEC p g TS\GP2001\Staff Re orts\Au ust 1 Contract&SOW to TC.doc ate• RESOLUTION (R) 01- 71 A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, DECLARING THAT THE "SCOPE OF WORK AND CONSULTANT COST FOR THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY FOCUS 2020 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE 2001" IS A PUBLIC RECORD; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY; AND AUTHORIZING THE AWARD OF CONTRACT AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTING SERVICES BETWEEN THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY AND BRW, INCORPORATED FOR GENERAL PLAN CONSULTING SERVICES. WHEREAS, the Town of Oro Valley is a political subdivision of the State of Arizona, and pursuant to Article 13, Section 7 of the Arizona Constitution, is vested with all rights, privileges, benefits and is entitled to the immunities and exemptions granted municipalities and political subdivisions under the Constitution and laws of the State of Arizona and the United States; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Department Staff sought consulting services for the Focus 2020 General Plan Update 2001 (Project Number OV 11-01-04); and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Department Staff recommend awarding a contract to BRW,Incorporated for General Plan Consulting Services due to their overall project understanding, approach, and project team capabilities; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Department Staff negotiated a fee of$236,000.00 for the consulting services of BRW, Incorporated of which their services are estimated to be complete in 16 months from the time of execution of the contract; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the Town to award a contract to BRW, Incorporated for General Plan Consulting Services, and Council deems it necessary to authorize the Town Attorney to prepare a contract in conformance with the Scope of Work and Consultant Cost for the Town of Oro Valley Focus 2020 General Plan Update 2001. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL OF, THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, as follows: Section 1: That certain document entitled the "Final Scope of Work and Consultant Cost for the Town of Oro Valley Focus 2020 General Plan Update 2001," three copies of which are on file in the office of the Town Clerk, is hereby declared to be a public record, and said copies are ordered to remain on file with the Town Clerk. General Plan Scope of Work/Contract Office of the Oro Valley Town Attorney/sib 7.25.2001 dr Section 2: That the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, that the Award of Contract awarded to BRW, Incorporated for General Plan Consulting Services, is hereby approved Section 3: That the Town Attorney is hereby authorized to take such steps as are necessary to prepare a contract in conformance with the Scope of Work and Consultant Cost for the Town of Oro Valley Focus 2020 General Plan Update 2001. Section 4: That the Mayor and any other administrative officials of the Town of Oro Valley are hereby authorized to take such steps as are necessary to execute and implement the terms of the Agreement. Section 5: It is necessary for the preservation of the peace, health, and safety of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, an emergency is declared to exist, and this resolution shall become immediately operative and in force from and after the date of posting hereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this 1st day of August , 2001. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Paul H. Loomis, Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn E. Cuvel i er, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Dan L. Dudley, Town Attorney General Plan Scope of Work/Contract Office of the Oro Valley Town Attorney/sib 7.25.2001 I Lam. ,Si%?`:�`•;•.:iJr.,»}:;:•`Y���H\ ;"``�;;;�?Yt%.;.,,;..: »ii`J.}'` "'iY:4A�;'.rr'."`,'.`:ivL.2`y�A't�\t''y�•:�.Evl..: J �` e• N `��. k2t.22}ytY`2 . �3' Nit j °t/Nf3E0 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE SCOPE OF WORK August 1, 2001 OVERVIEW The Town of Oro Valley is preparing an update to the General Plan. The current General Plan, Focus 2020,was adopted in July 1996, and was the third general plan adopted by the Town of Oro Valley. Since 1996, several General Plan amendments have been processed, a new General Plan Transit Element has been prepared, and other plans and studies have been updated and adopted. The purpose of the 2001 update is to review all new plans and studies prepared since 1996 and incorporate these into the updated plan, and to evaluate, meet and exceed the requirements of the Arizona Growing Smarter Act of 1998 and the Growing Smarter Plus Act of 2000. The update process will also implement the Town of Oro Valley Public Participation Plan, adopted in June 2000, which will guide the steps that the Town staff, citizens and General Plan Consultant will take to maximize public involvement in the update. BACKGROUND Oro Valley is a 31.2-square-mile suburban community situated six miles north of the Tucson city limits. Established in 1974, the Town has experienced a 345 percent population growth rate between 1990 and 2000, to the April 2000 Census population of 29,700. Although the built landscape is primarily residential, the Town is attracting significant commercial development along a major thoroughfare along its eastern edge, and new luxury resorts are planned for the northwestern portion. The study will examine all portions of the General Plan. The goals of the project are: 1. To provide the Town of Oro Valley with an updated General Plan which reflects the Town's policies regarding sustainable growth and development. The community's interest in conducting the update within a framework of sustainable development will be explored. Elements throughout the current Plan will be revised in order to reflect demographic and economic changes since 1996. 2. To incorporate recent changes in state planning law into the General Plan. 3, To prepare those required elements that are not currently adopted as part of the Town's General Plan. The preparation of elements shall include the new Plan elements required as part of the Growing Smarter Plus legislation, under A.R.S. 9-461. Development of criteria for a definition for"major"amendment to the General Plan shall be included in the process. 4. To refine and implement the Town of Oro Valley Public Participation Action Plan. During implementation, the Public Participation Plan will improve on or change methods in order to maximize public input into the planning process and will also evaluate the effectiveness of the sector approach. The Consultant will work closely with Town Staff in project task allocation and will utilize Town resources, where appropriate and economical. Staff members available for this project include Bryant Bodine,AICP, Planning and Zoning Administrator; Laura Pinnas, GIS Analyst; Bob Kovitz, Public Relations Specialist; and Town Project Manager, Melissa Shaw,AICP. Other planners from the Oro Valley Planning and Zoning Department may be available to assist with the project, dependent on workload. The Planning and Zoning Commission and Town Council will review the final plan. Through the tasks listed below, the study will update existing baseline demographic, land use and existing conditions data; review and make changes to the Goals, Objectives and Policies as they relate to future growth and growth related issues; review the existing framework and format for the General Plan which will facilitate the incorporation of future plan updates (at least every 10 years by statute), amendments, elements and additions; and recommend additional plan updates as appropriate. The process will also update existing and prepare those new elements required for the General Plan by the Growing Smarter Plus legislation. The General Plan update process will actively solicit and incorporate citizen comment by implementing Oro Valley's Public Participation Plan. Scope of Work Town of Oro Valley, Arizona Focus 2020 General Plan Update 1 8/1/01 PHASES,TASKS AND RESPONSIBILITIES: PHASE 1 Task 1.0PROJECT MANAGEMENT, INITIATION AND COORDINATION Task 1.1 Project Management The Consultant shall prepare a Master Project Schedule and a monthly task-based billing schedule, encompassing the entire project. The Consultant shall confirm all targets, meetings, reviews, and deliverables on the master schedule. The Consultant shall base the initial schedule upon information developed by the Consultant and provided by the Town staff. The Consultant shall then be responsible to maintain and update the schedule on a monthly basis during the course of the Project and shall submit each schedule revision to the Town for review and approval. Invoices shall be submitted with the monthly schedule update or revision. The billing shall include a monthly status memo that includes a summary the tasks completed and percent complete of each task, and a summary and evaluation of Public Participation Action Plan implementation. All products shall be electronically submitted for review by the Town Project Manager prior to the calendar deadline. The Town Project Manager and Consultant shall have weekly contact to discuss the project status. The Consultant will report to the Town Project Manager and Steering Committee, and work directly with a project Technical Advisory Committee. Products: Letter to Proceed (Town); Final Detailed Project Work Schedule by Task. Task 1.2 Implement Public Participation Action Plan and Establish Project Committees The Town of Oro Valley Public Participation Program, entitled the Oro Valley Public Participation Action Plan (PPAP), will be implemented as modified in this Scope of Work. The Consultant shall work with the Town to refine the PPAP. The Town Project Manager and Consultant will establish the project Steering Committee (SC) and Technical Advisory Committee (TAC). The TAC membership will include representatives from Town Departments, all neighboring governmental jurisdictions and local, State and Federal government entities, and others to be identified. A stakeholder's list shall be identified of all interested potential project participants. The Town with Consultant input shall prepare a project notebook for the Technical Advisory Committee and Steering Committee members and the project team. The Consultant shall prepare a professionally developed logo, project name, letterhead and tag line to be used as an identifying theme throughout the project. All public participation events will be summarized in a standard summary format previously approved by the Town Project Manager. Products: Establishment of Technical Advisory and Steering Committees (Town with Consultant); Stakeholder Data Base (Town responsibility); one electronic version of notebook cover sheet and side panel for Project Notebooks (Town with Consultant input); up to three (3) alternative and a preferred design Project Logo, project name, letterhead, tag line, miscellaneous graphics(Consultant). Task 1.2.1 Technical Advisory Committee Meetings (TAC) The Consultant will attend 5 (five) TAC meetings throughout the project, as shown on the Master Project Schedule. Products:5 (five) TAC meetings; meeting minutes by Town. Task 1.2.2 Steering Committee Meetings The Consultant will attend 10 (ten) Steering Committee meetings throughout the project, as shown on the Master Project Schedule. Scope of Work Town of Oro Valley,Arizona Focus 2020 General Plan Update 2 8/1/01 Products: 10 (ten) Steering Committee meetings; meeting minutes by Town. Task 1.2.3 Leadership Interviews The Consultant will conduct 10 (ten) leadership interviews throughout the project, as shown on the Master Project T Schedule. Staff will conduct 10 (ten)separate leadership interviews. Products: 20 (twenty) leadership interviews and summary of interviews conducted (10 by Consultant and 10 by Town (twenty) Staff). Task 1.2.4 Open Houses The Consultant will attend 2 (two) Open House meetings, as shown on the Master Project Schedule, and 1 (one) open houselannin meeting. The open houses will be scheduled to review vision/mission statement, goals objectives p g (Task 4) and Alternatives (Task 5). Immediately following the open house in Task 5, a study session with Planning and Zoning Commission and Town Council will be conducted to review the selected and preferred alternatives. The Town shall be responsible for scheduling and arranging the meeting location and preparing and distributing notification. Products: Conduct planning meeting and Open House. Task 1.2.5 Project Newsletters The Consultant will prepare 3 project newsletters and provide the Town with one master and one electronic version. The Town will distribute and mail. Newsletters will be 8.5"x11" 2-sided, designed as a 3-fold self-mailing form. Colors to be determined based on cost estimate. Products: Design (Consultant and Town staff), distribution (by Town) of 3 newsletters; 1 master and 1 electronic version in acceptable form(Consultant). Task 1.2.6 Web Page The Consultant shall work with the Town staff and Web Master to design a project web page and shall provide .pdf (Adobe Acrobat) documents for the web site. The Town shall be responsible for basic maintenance of the website and schedule page. The Consultant will design the site so the Town receives e-mail responses directly into a database. Web pages will include a basic information page, project schedule, text of draft plan elements as completed, topic focus information, and questionnaires related to focus topics. Products: Establishment and major updates to web page (Town with Consultant providing web pages for 5 updates and a final page, and major changes). Task 1.2.7 Public Surveys The Consultant shall design, with Town staff, at least one statistically valid public survey instrument. The survey will consist of a 400-household telephone survey to be designed to identify and prioritize issues of concern regarding the General Plan and Town growth, as well as gather other information deemed necessary by both the Town Project Manager and Consultant. Products: Design (Consultant and Town staff), distribution (by Town), data entry and analysis (Consultant and Town staff)of public survey. Task 1.2.8 Other Meetings One additional public meeting will be held by the Consultant at the Town Project Manager's request. Product: Additional public meeting,to be scheduled as needed. Scope of Work Town of Oro Valley,Arizona Focus 2020 General Plan Update 3 8/1/01 Task 1.3 Project Initiation The Consultant and Town Project Manager shall organize and lead a staff "kick-off' meeting with all Town Council, g Planning Commission, Board and staff members required to participate in the project. This meeting is intended to as to the project goals and schedule, assign responsibility, and verify needs. Input inform and educate participants regarding the project planningarea/sphere of influence as outlined in Task 1.5 shall be obtained. during this meeting eg g p Individual meetings with Town department staff to follow the initial kick-off will be scheduled as needed in order for the Consultant and TownManagercomplete Project to an assessment of existing and future plans and information needed for Task 3.0, Existing Condition Data Collection, Research and Analysis. g Products: Staff Kick-Off Meeting; revised Master Schedule documenting Department responsibilities and assignments (Town Project Manager); Regional Context Maps(Town). Task 1.4 Public Future Search Kick-Off Meetingto Establish Project Vision Statement, Goals and Objectives and Identification of Issues The Consultant and Town staff shall schedule, organize and lead an initial Public Future Search "kick-off' meeting. This is a community event and will include participation by the Steering Committee, stakeholders, elected and appointed Town officials and staff. The Public Future Search Kick Off Meeting is a visioning meeting that will introduce a project vision statement, clearly define the goals, objectives of the project and the project to the participants, develop discuss critical issues to be addressed throughout the process. The community's interest in conducting the update within a framework utilizingsustainable development standards, as adopted by the American Planning Association, will p be presented, explored and defined. Volunteer assistance will be solicited from participants. The project schedule will be describedresponsibility and res onsibilit assigned as appropriate. Input during this meeting regarding the project planning area/sphere of influence as outlined in Task 1.5 shall be obtained. Products: Public Future Search Kick-off Meeting; Project Newsletter#1 (Consultant)for distribution by the Town. Task 1.5 Determine Project Planning Area and Sphere of Influence The Consultant and Town Project Manager shall establish the tentative project planning area, or Planning Boundary, on input obtained from the Project Initiation and Public Future Search Kick-off meetings. All surrounding based p jurisdictions and government lands, including State and Federal, will be considered for inclusion within the Planning Boundaries. Boundaries will be revised as necessary during the early stages of Public Participation Plan implementation. Products: Preliminary planning boundary map(produced by the Town). TASK 2.0 CREATION AND ANALYSIS OF ELECTRONIC GENERAL PLAN BASED MAPS AND DATA LAYERS Task 2.1 Base/Data Mapping Primaryresponsibility for this task will be with the Town of Oro Valley. The Town will update and prepare the electronic p Y mapping in usinggeographic information system (GIS) for this project. The format of all GIS related data and data analysis generated sis for Task 3 will be approved by the Oro Valley GIS Analyst and Town Project Manager. The following a partial artial list of GIS-related data and maps to be produced and provided by the Town, as completed and available: • Orthophotos 2000 data • Site Location/Regional Context/Planning Area Boundary (update to include adjacent Catalina State Park & Forest Service Land, Catalina Village, and Pinal County to the north). • Historic Annexation • Soils/Topography(add DRASTIC information from PAG) Scope of Work Town of Oro Valley,Arizona 8/1/01 Focus 2020 General Plan Update 4 • Geology/Hydrology Town-wide Drainage study, to be converted into GIS format; contact USGS for fault/karst information) • General Plan Land Use(complete updates to existing map) • Existing Zoning (complete PAD map) • Specific Planning/Approved/Proposed Land Use • Existing Land Use • Existing Land Ownership, including public lands and large property ownership • Municipal Facilities and Services (including sewer, roads and major water lines,gas,electric,cable, if available) • Environmentally y Sensitive Lands Map, for vegetation, wildlife (designated Pygmy-owl habitat and other maps available from Pima CountySonoran Desert Conservation Plan [SDCP]), views and cultural (composite map to be completed as below) • Pima County Comprehensive Plans • Roadway network • Oro Valley Transit Plan • Oro Valley Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan • Oro Valley Parks, Open Space and Trails map and Trails Task Force proposed trails map • Annexation Plan Map The following is a partial list of GIS-related data that the Town will work with a Consultant to obtain and/or develop: • Three alternative growth scenarios and one preferred growth scenario land use maps (Task 5.1) • Economic Development Parcels (suitability/market analysis &inventory of existing, zoned &potential commercial) • Transportation Plan (GIS data needs to be obtained) • Pinal County Comprehensive Plan, current zoning map and development data • ESL Composite Map with data from Town; obtain data for cultural (archaeological) resources data layer. Products: Town staff will produce maps listed above,with some Consultant assistance;the Consultant will provide maps and data with a description of methodology and documentation in acceptable meta data electronic format of all analysis performed in GIS. TASK 3.0 EXISTING CONDITION DATA COLLECTION, RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS Task 3.1. Information Research and Analysis The Consultant shall work with Town staff and review all pertinent documents and determine the geographic and demographic information to be updated and included as part of the updated General Plan. The Consultant shall identify additional pertinent documents that will be collected by the Town. Town staff and the Consultant shall research and update the essential and desirable data, charts, graphs and tables found in the existing General Plan and incorporate the updated data into the new document format as described in the product/project specifications. The information to be included within this portion of the Plan update process shall include Town boundaries, size, and annexations, growth trends, demographic information including population and population projections, environmental and physical conditions, infrastructure location information (existing and proposed), information regarding amounts and location of vacant and non-vacant land and characteristics, and economic and socio-economic data, all described further below. The Town, with assistance from the Consultant, shall be responsible for the collection and acquisition of all technical and demographic data necessary to update the Plan. As it is available, all relevant data shall be derived from the 2000 Census. The information related to the preparation of the General Plan will be included in a report in both text and graphic form. Public"Topic Focus Groups"will be conducted for each or a combination of data collection topics. Materials for Focus Group discussion will be prepared and distributed one week in advance of the meeting. Scope of Work Town of Oro Valley,Arizona Focus 2020 General Plan Update 5 8/1/01 Task 3.2. Department Interviews The Consultant will conduct, with the Town Project Manager, up to 6 (six) department interviews to collect all relevant g data and background information, to request input into the process and to discuss specific elements and the new requirements for the General Plan update. Products: Up to six completed department interviews and summary of interviews Task 3.3. Background, History and Development Patterns Town staff with the Consultant shall prepare a brief history of the development of Oro Valley, utilizing secondary source information, ranchinginformation from the Sonoran Desert Conservation Plan, and the document A History of Oro Valley, by Henry Suozzi. Town staff with Consultant input shall research and provide the information for this task. The and historywill include significant events in the development of the Town including its history of background g incorp oration/annexation, description and analysis of development patterns, significant cultural and historical context. Product: Town with Consultant will prepare an updated history and development patterns of Oro Valley; Incorporate information into Background Report in Task 3.12; Maps (Town) and Graphics (Consultant), Materials for Topic Focus Group. Task 3.4. Cultural, Natural Resources and Environmental Characteristics An assessment of existing cultural, natural resources and environmental characteristics in the Town and planning area will berep ared to determine their impacts on opportunities and constraints for future growth. The Environmentally P Sensitive Lands Study, and other identified plans and studies will be incorporated into this assessment. Pima County's Sonoran Desert Conservation Plan (SDCP) will be reviewed and if appropriate, components integrated into the Plan, as by upon agreed the Consultant and Town Project Manager. The necessary exhibits to accurately depict g climatology, topography,to o raphy, soils, geology, hydrology/drainage, vegetation and wildlife will be included. Man-made characteristics such as noise or other potential hazards will also be discussed. All information will be derived from secondary sources provided by the Town or other public agencies. Products: Natural Resources and Environmental Characteristics Assessment; Incorporate information into Background Report in Task 3.12; Materials for Topic Focus Group. Task 3.5. Open Space, Parks and Recreation This task will include an inventory of existing and proposed open space, recreational resources, parks and access points to these areas, and an analysis of future needs for these resources. Products: Open Space, Parks & Recreation Assessment; Incorporate information into Background Report in Task 3.12; Materials for Topic Focus Group. Task 3.6. Housing The Consultant with Town staff shall update the existing housing element with currently available data. An inventory and supply/demand analysis of the existing housing stock and mix in order to assess housing trends and the relationship to future population and employment growth and related affordability issues will be conducted, including an examination of sales price trends to the extent that data is available. The existing housing supply will be examined and general characteristics assessed such as age, product type, pricing, rental rates, and amenities. To the extent possible, the Town of Oro Valley will provide the above data if available. The Consultant will use other data sources and its own research efforts where necessary to augment the Town's data. Products: Housing Assessment and Analysis Report; Incorporate information into Background Report in Task 3.12; Materials for Topic Focus Group. Scope of Work Town of Oro Valley,Arizona Focus 2020 General Plan Update 6 8/1/01 Task 3.7. General Planning, Land Use and Zoning existinggeneral planning efforts, existing land use and zoning The Consultant will inventory, analyze and compare mapand potential opportunities or constraints to future growth. Maps using the base districts and patterns to determine pp appropriate data will be prepared by the Town utilizing data and information collected by the Consultant. overlaid with app p of existingrecommended general plan land uses, existing land The inventory will determine the types and acreage typeand existingzoning to determine existing community buildout and the incremental use/vacant land by yp , analysis to identify capacity of the Town. A specificy areas suitable for potential mixed-use and neighborhood commercial developments will be conducted. written assessments summarizing the analysis of existing land uses, zoning Products: Comparison tables, charts and analysis and mapping bystatus and type and the corresponding computer data bases for y pp and land use patterns Yp purposes; Incorporate information into Background Report in Task 3.12; Ma s p (Town), Materials for Topic Focus Group. Task 3.8. Large Property Ownership The Town, with Consultant assistance, will define, inventory, analyze and collect data for the Town to use to prepare a land ownershipwithin and surrounding the Town to determine the potential map illustrating the general pattern of large lands opportunities for future growth. The type of property ownership will include governmentalby constraints or agency Munici al, County, State, Federal, or other public agencies) and privately-owned lands. The Town will gyp determine the size criteria to be used for this analysis. This information will be utilized in development of the Growth Elements, and possiblyin discussions regarding criteria defining Major Amendment. Area and Cost of Development Consultant will conduct 3 to 5 interviewsg property with largeowners/developers in order to collect current and future development ment information. This will be utilized in the economic development analysis. Map (produced bythe Town); database analysis of constraints or opportunities Products: Land ownership (parcel) 3.12; Materials for interviews (Consultant); Incorporate information into Background Report in Task(Consultant), 3 5 Topic Focus Group. Task 3.9. Transportation System Department and utilizingsecondary source data and information provided by the Working with the Town Public Works p p Public system Department, the Consultant will collect existing data to describe the the existing transportation y stem in a includingstreets, transit and bicycle/pedestrian (alternate modes) facilities.\ the Town and within the planning area, Existing Town of Oro Valley plans and studies that will be synthesized into this analysis include: the Transit Element Bicycle/Pedestrian Plan, Bicycle/Pedestrian Feasibility Study, and Bicycle/Pedestrian Annual and Transit Master Plan, Y Accidents, Traffic Financial Plan for Road Projects March 2000, Evaluation of ADOT Reported Traffic Report, Strategic Calming Report and the Transportation Plan and will be updated with information from Pima County, Pima Association of Governments and Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT)data as necessary. Products:Transportation System Maps (Town); Anal sis database; Incorporate information into Background Report in Y Task 3.12; Materials for Topic Focus Group; Task 3.10. Community Facilities and Services Conditions Staff with the Consultant willprepare are an re inventoryof community services and facilities within the Town and the planning area to assess their adequately abilityto ade uatel serve existing and future needs in the community. Information for an availability analysis will also be prepared. Information related to existing potable water (the infrastructure capacity avail, y Y and provided to the UtilityPotable Water System Master Plan will be summarized by the Water Utility Staff Water Y lit (information for this ortion may be obtained from PAG and/or ADEQ), sewer, natural gas, Consultant), water qua y p electrical, public safety andemergency services, health care and recreational systems, proximity of landfills, telephone, and cable facilities and district boundaries will be collected from Town staff, previous studies and interviews with Scope of Work Town of Oro Valley, Arizona 811101 Focus 2020 General Plan Update 7 municipal and other agency officials. This information will be used to develop the Public Safety, Facilities and Services Elementboth Public Safety and Public Facilities and Services Elements). (formerly Products: Community Facilities and Services InventoryMap (Town); Infrastructure Capacity Analysis; Incorporate information into Background Report in Task 3.12; Materials for Topic Focus Group. Task 3.11. Socioeconomic, Demographic,and Market Conditions and assess existingsocioeconomic conditions to enable the Town to make judgments The Consultant will identify collected for Oro 'n futuregrowth patterns and economic opportunities. To the extent available, data will be regarding and Pima Count as it may be relevant for comparative purposes. This task will Valley, other competitive jurisdictionsY utilize secondary federal, state,county and local data including: g • Town of Oro Valley Strategic Plan for Economic Development and all prior studies related to economic development and fiscal analysis • Census and other demographic data • Regional industry and employment data • The existing General Plan and land use maps • A list or on report planned major infrastructure improvements in the Town and surrounding reigon p • Any recent comparable land sales or development trend data that the Town may have • A list ofp lanned and proposed major private and public development projects in the market area • A list of major industries and employers in the market area. • A list of local contacts for data collection • The Town budget, CIP, and any prior public facility financing plans Task 3.11.1 Fiscal Conditions on informationprovided byTown staff, the Consultant will summarize relevant information on the Based principally following subjects: Fiscal Data Review—The Town will provide the Consultant the following data: • Assessed valuation by land use category in the Town; • Recent real estate sales transactions for housing, industrial, and commercial buildings, and undeveloped land, to ascertain current market values; • Sales tax trends for retail and non-retail outlets; • Transient occupancy tax trends and market average-daily room rates; • Impact fee schedules and formulas; • The Town's CIP; • And other fiscal and budgetary data. Y Cost and Service Standards - Analyze the most current Annual Budget to review Town operations, and fiscal revenues and expenses. Supplement the available materials with direct interviews of the appropriate financial pp managersand department contacts to determine if there are any inherent economies-of-scale or extraordinary cost p circumstances on a marginal level, particularly as they relate to the annexation area. Review the Town's General Plan g policies and masterplans that mayestablish public service standards. The results of this task will provide and other updated baseline revenue, and cost and service standards for the Town's existing service functions. Prior to the next step, Department Heads will review these costs estimates and service levels for accuracy. Task 3.11.2 Market Context The Consultant, with assistance from Town staff where indicated, will summarize the following market information: Spatial Growth Patterns -- Based on the general plans in the area and interviews with developers, brokers, and Town staff, the spatialgrowth patterns of the region and the locational tendencies of major land uses and economic p clusters will be reviewed. Scope of Work Town of Oro Valley,Arizona eneral Plan U date 8 8/1/01 Focus 2020 G p trends are keydeterminants for commercial and housing demand. Market Demographic Analysis -- Demographic re ion. Consultant, will prepare a demographic analysis of the Town and its marketg Town staff, with thep p � n Characteristics will include population, households, age distribution, income distribution, and educational attainment. inon data to be provided by the Town, employment trends in the region, with a Labor Trends Market Area Based focus on economic clusters, future development trends, will be reviewed to analyze how the work force in the market area may change and how this change may affect the Town's economic development potential. — Data will be provided by the Town and the Consultant will review basic real Selected Real Estate Characteristics estate characteristics region. This review will for industrial and commercial development in the Town and surrounding include the volume of development over time bymajor land use, and an inventory of major commercial and industrial developments. The following research will be conducted: 1) Characteristics of major industrial real estate trends 2) Characteristics of major commercial real estate trends. 3) Characteristics of major tourism related development trends. � 4) Characteristics of any major planned or proposed projects in the market area.t Based Demand Profile— on the information collected above, the Consultant will prepare a generalized profile of market demand for the planning area. profile The will present findings according to broad land use categories (e.g., single-family and multi-familyresidential; neighborhood, community, and regional retail; office; resort). -- of Oro Valleywill provide this analysis for Consultant review to discuss the potential SWOT Analysis Town strengths,weaknesses,oportunities, and threats of each alternative economic development vision. ' ' New Development and Redevelopment-- This will be developed for the Growth Area Element. Opportunities for p Based on the market and economicanalysis, identifyopportunities for new development concepts within the Town's areas, andpotential annexation areas. Identify opportunities for redevelopment and infill areas, undeveloped revitalization of existingareas, if appropriate. The Town will identify up to 3-5 locations for which Consultant will provide preliminary opinions regarding development potential. Products: Existing demographic/ socioeconomic condition graphs, charts and analysis; Incorporate information into Background Report in Task 3.12; Materials for Topic Focus Group. Task 3.11.3 Economic Base Indicators for the the information generated under Task 3.11.1, the Consultant will prepare Economic Base Indicators Based on Town within the context of its regional market. Information related to employment characteristics will be presented in with summarytext including, but not limited to, employment by amount, type, and sales tax generation. graphic form g Products: Economic analysis including graphs, charts, and narrative; Incorporate information into Background Technical in Task 3.12; Materials for Topic Focus Group; Task 3.12. Background Report Information collectedanalyzedduring and the data collection phase will be summarized and presented in a background report, chapters with cha ters to be numbered and titled to correspond with the appropriate General Plan element(s). Products: Background Technical Report. TASK 4.0 ESTABLISH COMMUNITY VISIONING PROCESS AND ANALYZE EXISTING GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES DRAFTING Scope of WorkTown of Oro Valley,Arizona 8/1/01 Focus 2020 General Plan Update 9 Task 4.1 Technical Discussion of Issue Identification and Analyze Existing Goals,Objectives and Policies With TAC and Steering Committee, identify new community issues while analyzing applicability of current General Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies. Criteria for the definition of major amendments to the General Plan will be drafted by Town staff with Consultant assistance, and issues regarding current General Plan interpretations, especially the findings utilized to review General Plan change applications, will be reviewed and analyzed. During this process, specific General Plan designations of properties that have proven to be controversial will be reviewed and analyzed. p g Products:Listing of Community Issues and Analysis of Existing Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies Task 4.2 Topic Focus Group Meetings Five (5)Topic Focus GroupMeetings will be conducted to present findings of the data collection, research and analysis p phase to the Town citizens, and to identify new community issues while analyzing applicability of current General Plan Goals Objectives and Policies. The 5 topic areas may be: Community Design/Urban Form; Transportation/Circulation; Land Use Patterns, Housing and Economic Development: Cultural and Natural Resources and Environment; and Open Space, Recreation and Parks. In the Community Design/Urban Form Focus Group, the Community Design element the Town's present vision for Community Design n will be explored. Additionally, Town Center Plan Visioning, as designated under current Focus 2020, Public Facilities and Services Element, will be reviewed and assessed as to the Town's present desire to pursue this action. Initiate, in cooperation with the State Land Department, visioning for a conceptual Master Plan for State Trust Land north of the Town boundary. In the Land Use, Housing and Economic Development Focus Group, large landowners, developers and organizations such as SAHBA will be invited to the meeting. Products: (All Consultant unless noted); 5 Topic Focus Group Meetings (Consultant with Town Staff); Materials for meetings; website updates; electronic version of newsletter/flyers/ schedule and/or announcement with time and location for public distribution(printing and distribution will be the responsibility of the Town). Task 4.3 Preliminary Draft Vision Statement, Goals and Objectives Based on input from Tasks 4.1 & 4.2, develop refined draft vision statement, goals and objectives that will guide the formulation of the Town of Oro Valley General Plan. Products: Draft Vision/Mission statement; Newsletter and web updates, as described in Task 1.2 Task 4.4 Public Hearing to Adopt Vision/Mission Statement, Goals and Objectives Conductp ublic hearings with the Planning Commission and Town Council for approval of the Vision, Goals and Objectives. Prior to the Planning and Zoning Commission, an open house as described in Task 1.2.4 will be held to review the Vision, Goals and Objectives. Products: 1 Planning and Zoning Commission hearing by staff and 1 Town Council hearing (Consultant and staff). Task 4.5 Final Draft Vision, Goals and Objectives The Final Draft Vision, Goals and Objectives will contain refined vision, goals and objectives for each plan element as revised after input from the community. The Consultants will document this information in a Technical Report that will reflect the agreements reached at critical points in the process. Products: Draft Vision, Goals, and Objectives Technical Report summarizing data collection, public input process, and final Draft Vision, Goals and Objectives. Scope of Work Town of Oro Valley,Arizona Focus 2020 General Plan Update 10 8/1/01 PHASE 1! TASK 5.0 GROWTH ALTERNATIVES DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION Task 5.1 Develop Range of Growth Alternative Scenarios will developthree (3) alternative growth scenarios for land use needs for the community, based on The Consultant project planning area established in Task 1.5, data research and analysis, the public visioning process, and population provided bythe Town. Supporting maps, graphics and narrative suitable for public viewing, hearings and a projections pp g "road show"that depict the range of alternatives will be prepared. Products:, Growth alternatives and supporting graphics, maps, and narrative; Project Newsletter#2 for distribution by o pp the Town (see Task 1.2.5). Task 5.2 Evaluate, Prioritize and Select Growth Alternatives Consultant will evaluate and prioritize three selected alternatives and identify a preferred scenario based on input The received during publicvisioning process the and goals and objectives achievement; impact on existing/programmed public facilities or networks, impact on the natural environment, and fiscal impact. As the basis for the comparative pub c p assessment of the growth alternatives, the Consultant will prepare population and employment estimates for five-year increments through 2020, as well as estimates for buildout. The Consultant will conduct a comparative assessment of growth alternative to generate the preferred alternative. The alternatives and the comparative analysis will be each presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission and Town Council for input on the preferred alternative. Task 5.2.1 Infrastructure Working with Town staff,the Consultant will compare the alternatives as they relate to major public works infrastructure (e.g., sewer,water, drainage). Task 5.2.2 Transportation The Consultant will compare the three alternative growth scenarios with respect to their transportation system implications, focusing on deficiencies or conflicts in the current system planning assumptions. Existing Town of Oro Valley plans and studies that will be synthesized into this analysis include: the Transit Element and Transit Master Plan, Bicycle/PedestrianBicycle/Pedestrian Plan, Bic cle/Pedestrian Feasibility Study, and Bicycle/Pedestrian Annual Report, Strategic Financial Plan for Road Projects March 2000, Evaluation of ADOT Reported Traffic Accidents, Traffic Calming Report and the Transportation Plan.and will be updated with information from Pima County, Pima Association of Governments and Arizona Department of Transportation(ADOT) data as necessary. Task 5.2.3 Natural Resources, Open Space, Parks and Recreation The Consultant willre are a comparative assessment of the potential effects of the three growth scenarios on the p p area's natural resources, open space, parks and recreation, as summarized under Task 3.4. &3.5. Task 5.2.4 Fiscal and Economic Based on information collected under Task 3.11, the Consultant will work with Town staff to project comparative fiscal implications over time for the three General Plan alternative scenarios. Generalized revenue projections will be based on the anticipated development program, and absorption and market value estimates. Based on assumed land absorptionland use type, planning-level assessed valuation estimates in five-year increments through 2020 will be p by projected to estimate property tax revenue over time. Prior to the next step, Department Heads will review these fiscal impact projections for accuracy. Expenditures will be presented on an annual basis in current and constant dollars for operating costs incurred to maintain the Town's service standard objectives. The net fiscal impact on operations will be presented for five-year increments through 2020. Scope of Work Town of Oro Valley,Arizona Focus 2020 General Plan Update 11 8/1/01 Task 5.2.5 Preferred Alternative Based on the evaluation conducted under Tasks 5.2.1 through 5.2.4, the Consultant will collaborate with Town staff to identify a preferred growth scenario for public consideration. Products: Comparative evaluation of Alternatives under consideration and recommendation of a preferred alternative (to be incorporated into Alternatives Evaluation Report to prepared under Task 5.5). Task 5.3 Town Annexation Plan Based on the selected land use alternative and zoning, a Town Primary responsibility will be with the Town. The plan will that projects a determination of how large Oro Valley will grow. Annexation Plan will be developedp J include a No annexation, and low, generally assess the fiscal impact and cost/benefit of annexation scenarios, to medium and high annexation scenarios. for the General Plan alternatives, the Consultant will evaluate Annexation Analysis - Based on the factors developed associated xationn This will require the fiscal cost/benefit of anne information regarding any tax sharing or with annexation under Arizona State Law. Products: Annexation Plan and Annexation Map(Town with Consultant review). Task 5.4 Public Hearings and Zoning will conduct 2 Public Hearings(1 with Planning Commission and 1 with Town Council)to review and adopt the preferred Alternative. These will be held after Open House#2, as per Task 1.2.4 Products:2 public hearings(staff). (ask 5.5 Alternatives Evaluation Report Evaluation The Consultant will prepare an Alternatives Report that will document the process and the decisions that were made. Product:Alternatives Evaluation Report PHASE III TASK 6.0 DRAFT GENERAL PLAN ELEMENT PREPARATION, PREPARATION OF NEW GENERAL PLAN ELEMENTS AND CONSOLIDATION AND UPDATE OF EXISTING GENERAL PLAN ELEMENTS In conjunction with the activities and tasks previously listed, the Consultant shall prepare those elements of the General Plan population ulation in excess of 2,500 which are not currently contained in the required by ARS Sec. 9-461.05 for municipalities having a p ExistingGeneral been adopted byreference as part of the Town of Oro Valley General Plan. General Plan or which have not p incorporate elements shall be updated to be consistent with the new elements and shall p orate new pertinent information, data forthe draftgeneralplan update elements, a series of supportive policies will and public input. Based on the review and supportupdate elements. thirteen (13) elements that will be incorporated into the final draft general plan p be prepared for each of the These policies will underpin preparation nder in the re aration of the implementation program in Task 7.0. In order to ensure minimal ' future physicaldevelopment and because of their interrelated nature, the land use, open environmental impact on the Town's p itshall be developed natural resources, growth area, water resources and environmental planning elements space and simultaneously. Growing Review for Smarter Plus compliance will be ongoing throughout the process. part of this task shall be coordinated with all Town Departments, including Town Preparation of the elements to be prepared as � n Police Manager, Public Works,Water, Finance, Economic Development, Legal,Transit, Parks and Recreation, Public Relations and Building Safety. The Steering Committee and Technical Advisory Committee will be consulted throughout the process. The elements are further described in the tasks listed below. Scope of Work Town of Oro Valley, Arizona 8/1/01 Focus 2020 General Plan Update 12 • Land Use • Circulation, Bicycle/Pedestrian Alternate Mode and Transit • Housing • Parks and Recreation • Open Space and Natural Resource Conservation update to meet new open space requirements • Economic Development • Public Safety, Facilities and Services • Community Design • Cultural & Historic Resources • Growth Area—new for Oro Valley by ARS • Environmental Planning-new for Oro Valley by ARS • Cost of Development-new for Oro Valley by ARS • Water Resources-new for Oro Valley by ARS Task 6.1 Draft Land Use Element The Draft Land Use Element will include a land use map and text illustrating the pattern and distribution of land use by the landparcels located throughout the Town of Oro Valley. The element shall include a specific categories for categories; identifyspecific population densityand buildingintensity recommended for the land use g p statement of those development patterns and policies to promote infill or compact development and locations where p programs air qualityand access to solar energy for all general categories of land use; include should be encouraged; consider policies that address maintaining a broad variety of land uses. Products:Draft Land Use Element, Draft Policies, Maps(Town and Consultant). Task 6.2 Draft Circulation, Bicycle/Pedestrian Alternate Mode and Transit Element proposed general location and extent of existingand freeways, arterial and collector streets, bicycle routes and other modes of transportation, correlated with the land use element of the plan. The existing Oro Valley Transportation Pedestrian Plan and Transit Element shall be reviewed and incorporated into this General Plan Plan, Bicycle and lement and each shall become a section within this element. The existing plans shall be evaluated based on input ut e , duringthe visioningprocess, and the Draft Element will include maps and text illustrating future and goals determined improvements in Oro Valley V lle for each section. Based on public comment regarding the existing plans and the goals and objectives statements regardingthis element, recommendations for revision of existing plans shall then be included in the implementation plan. The Town will distribute and present the draft element to the Transit Advisory Board for review and comment. Transit AdvisoryBoard meeting (Town); Draft Circulation Element, Draft Policies, Maps(Town) Products: Task 6.3 Draft Housing Element The Draft Housing Element will include an evaluation of existing housing supply and demand and present a future housing development strategy, how the Town will accommodate demand for housing that serves different household types and income groups, and how the Town will address jobs/housing balance objectives, and analyze the Town's p need for affordable housing. This issue will be coordinated with Pima County and other relevant agencies. Products:Draft Housing Element, Draft Policies. Task 6.4 Draft Parks and Recreation Element This element updateexisting will the element and include an evaluation of the current Parks, Open Space and Trails Master Plan, current parksystems,s stems, and will be integrated with Task 6.5 as necessary. The draft element will be presented to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and Trails Task Force for review and comment. The Scope of Work Town of Oro Valley,Arizona 8/1/01 Focus 2020 General Plan Update 13 effectiveness of the zoning code regarding provision of recreation amenities will be evaluated by staff and the Consultant and presented during the Focus Group meeting. Products:Draft Parks and Recreation Element, Draft Policies, Maps(Town); meeting with PARC(Town). Task 6.5 OpenSpace S ace and Natural Resources Conservation Element Conservation Element will include an evaluation Draft Open Space and Natural Resources of existing and future open space that enhances residential and employment land uses within the Town. The Element will include a s points; an analysis of forecasted recreational resources and access comprehensive inventory of open space areas, � acquisition strategies and policies; on the preferred growth scenario; management and protection policies; a q g needs based regional system. This element will be partially served b and strategies to promote an integrated by the Environmentally y Canyon Management Plan, the Parks Open Space and Trails (POST) Plan, and the Honey Bee y g Sensitive Lands (ESL) p ala ers to be rovided by the Town, Plan. The Consultant shall prepare a weighted composite ESL map with dat y p The Consultant shall work with the Towns ESL consultant to including viewsheds and cultural resources (archaeology). integrated and connected regional open space system, and to evaluate for consistency and review the element for an g incorporate appropriate ESL policies. Products: Draft Open Space and Natural Resources Conservation Element, Draft Policies, Maps (Town) and Composite ESL Map, as stated in Task 2.1 (Consultant). Task 6.6 Draft Economic (Prosperity) Development Element will prepare a Draft Economic Development Element that recommends amendments to The Consultant, with staff, p p will identifythe following: Valley's existingcommunity economic development strategy. The Draft Element the Oro y • Overall vision • Specific economic development sub-concepts • Desired land-use mix • Suggested economic development clusters and preliminary locational recommendations • Economic development delivery systems • Supportive General Plan policies Products:Draft Economic Development Element, Draft Policies. Task 6.7 Draft Public Safety, Facilities and Services Element Town staff and the Consultant will evaluate overlapin this element with the new Growth Area and Water Resources New Public Safety, and based on public comment regarding the issues, refine and focus this element. Y Element, documented in the Plan. One of the services that will be examined is increased public Facilities and Services will be access to information over the internet and an analysis or survey of the type of information the public desires access. The Town's new StormwaterManagementProgram Pro ram will be a separate section of and integrated into this element. Existing documents related to the Stormwater Management program will be reviewed and synthesized for inclusion into the element by the Public Works Department with Consultant assistance. Products:Draft Public Safety, Facilities and Services Element, Draft Policies, Map(Town). Task 6.8 Draft Community Design Element Update the existing Community Design Desi n Element with comments received during the visioning meeting from Task 4.2 to Town character and appearance. Invite the Green Building Alliance to a Focus Group answer questions regarding pp Meeting that focuses on sustainability and green building design guidelines. Include the Development ment Review Board (DRB) in the review and comment of this draft element. Products:Meeting with DRB; Draft Community Design Element, Draft Policies,graphics. Scope of Work Town of Oro Valley, Arizona 811101 Focus 2020 General Plan Update 14 Task 6.9 Draft Cultural and Historic Resources Element staff and the Consultant for consistency and overlap with the analysis of the Open This element will be re-evaluated by where a ro nate so Space and Natural Resources and Environmental Planning Elements. Reorganize this element pp p discussion in the Parks and Recreation Element are moved to that element. that cultural resources suitable for development of this Information from the EnvironmentallySensitive Lands Study for cultural resources will be utilized in element. The Greater Oro ValleyArts Council (GOVAC) shall be included in review of this element. Products: Meeting with GOVAC (Town), Draft Cultural and Historic Element, Draft Policies, Map (Town with Consultant assistance to obtain cultural (archaeological)data, as stated in Task 2.1). Task 6.10 Draft Growth Area Element include an evaluation of the draft land use element to identify the most beneficial The Draft Growth Area Element will areas for future development in terms of infrastructure, transportation and public facilities. The Growth Area Element will identify areas suitable for muttransportation multimodal trans and infrastructure development, and include policies to make circulation more efficient; to conserve significant natural resources in the growth automobile, transit, and multimodalinfrastructure. The promote the coordinated public and private construction of timely and financially sound area; and to Environmentally Sensitive Lands Composite Map will be utilized in the analysis for growth areas. Products:Draft Element(Consultant), Draft Policies, Map (analysis and data by Consultant; map by Town). Task 6.11 Draft Environmental Planning Element The Draft Environmental Planning Element will include an evaluation of the existing and potential impacts of the built community upon the natural environment to determine where the most appropriate areas for future development should take place. The Environmental PlanningElement will contain analysis, policies, and strategies to address anticipated plan'selements and proposed development on air quality, water quality, and other natural resources. effects of the p p EnvironmentallySensitive Lands Plan will form the basis for water quality and natural Policies and strategies from the resourcespoliciesstrategies.and strate ies. Discussion in this element will be developed by Town staff and the Consultant to of Governments (PAG) and Pima County Department of Environmental Quality work in relate to Pima Association regard to air quality. The draft Air QualityElement prepared by PAG will be reviewed and incorporated if appropriate. Products:Draft Element, Draft Policies, Maps (analysis and data by Consultant; maps by Town). Task 6.12 Draft Cost of Development Element The Draft Cost of Development Element will include an evaluation of the potential impacts of the built community and the ability of development to pay proportionate its share for public facilities and services. The Element will identify require the development to payits fair share (term to be defined) toward the cost of additional policies and strategies to p public service needs generated development,bythe develo ment, including bonding, special taxation districts, development fees, ins and service privatization. Situations where there are exceptions to the cost of facility construction, dedications, development, any, should be identified. Existing Town of Oro Valley impact fee system will be considered. Products:Draft Element; Draft Policies,Analysis and Maps by Consultant Task 6.13 Draft Water Resources Element The existing Oro Valley Potable Water Master Plan, Conservation Plan and Renewable Water Resources Plan will be the existingsurface water, groundwater and effluent supplies, and to evaluate the draft land use synthesized to evaluate to determine how future growth will be adequately served by available water supplies. This and growth area element analysis will include evaluation of the CAP allocation for the planning area. Primary responsibility for this task will be with the Oro Valley Water Utility staff with assistance from the Consultant. Products:Draft Element, Draft Policies, Maps (by Town with Consultant assistance). Scope of WorkTown of Oro Valley,Arizona 8/1/01 Focus 2020 General Plan Update 15 TASK 7.0 DRAFT IMPLEMENTATION AND EVALUATION PLAN DEVELOPMENT Task 7.1 Draft Implementation Plan Measures Working with Town staff, elected officials, the Steering Committee, and the Technical Advisory Committee, the p Consultant shall prepare an updated General Plan Implementation Program. Based upon the ideas and concepts Objectives and Policies, the General Plan Implementation Program will identify both the within updated Goals, se res and specific activities necessary to implement the plan in a logical and reasonable time sequence program. procedu p ram format, a matrix identifying responsibilities and timeframes, will be utilized and The existing Implementation Prog modified as follows: associated policies and costs will be identified for each Action. additional implementation/evaluation mechanisms will be made and may include but are not Recommendations for p progress towardro limited to: development of community indicators, benchmarks and performance targets to measure p g achieving tangiblegoals,oals, zoning code and/or subdivision code revision/updating, capital improvements programming, planning projects and other plan implementation tools. If proposed, these mechanisms and specific and/or sub-area p g may exceed the timeframe to prepare and adopt the general plan. Products: Study Session/Uvor s p k ho for Boards, Commission and Council; Technical Advisory Committee and Steering Committee Meetings; Draft Implementation Program, Final Implementation Program Task 7.2 Topic Focus Open House A Topic Focus Open House will be conducted to present the draft elements to the Town citizens. with Town Staff); Materials for meeting; newsletter described in Task Products. Topic Focus Open House (Consultant 1.2.5; flyers/sche Jule and/or announcement with time and location for public distribution (printing and distribution will be the responsibility of the Town). Task 7.3 Draft Implementation Report prepare Implementation Consultant are will re a Draft Im lementation Report that documents the results of Tasks 7.1 and 7.2. Product: Draft Implementation Report PHASE IV TASK 8.0 PREPARE DRAFT GENERAL PLAN DOCUMENT AND STUDY SESSION Task 8.1 Draft General Plan Document Upon completion of Tasks1.0-7.0, the Consultant shall prepare a draft of the updated General Plan and present it to the citizens, Town staff, the SteeringCommittee, and Technical Advisory Committee for review. This document shall include the draft plan in its final form including but not limited to all updated text, graphics,tables and elements. Upon completion of the Draft General Plan document, the Town of Oro Valley shall be responsible for the distribution of the draft to outside agencies for review and comment as legally required. Following the legally required sixty (60) day review periodTown staff will work with the Consultant to update the draft General Plan document to reflect any , changes made necessary upon review of the outside agency comments. Products: Project Newsletter#3 for distribution bythe Town, Study Session/Workshop for Boards, Commission and Council; Draft General Plan document. Task 8.2 Study Session with Planning and Zoning Commission and Town Council Zoning A point study session with the Planningand Commission and Town Council will be scheduled, during which the Consultant and Town staff shall present the Final Draft General Plan Update for discussion and questions. Scope of Work Town of Oro Valley,Arizona 8/1/01 Focus 2020 General Plan Update 16 Product: Study Session, presentation materials. ARINGS MUNICIPAL AGENCY REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION, ASK 9,0 PLANNING COMMISSION HE , WN COUNCIL HEARINGS AND ELECTION MATERIALS Task 9.1. Final Draft General Plan Update Review shall be prepared, finished and bound in the form as determined under The Final Draft General Plan Update p p Project/Product Specifications,for review and recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission to Council. Products: Final Color General ., Plan document; digital products to be up-loaded on Town hardware to ensure compatibility and error-free operation; Steering Committee Meeting# 10,. p Y Task 9.2. Planning and Zoning Commission Public Hearings the Final Draft General Plan Update during two (2) Planning and Zoning Town staff and the Consultant will present locations to permit the public hearings. The hearings will be properly advertised and held in two separate Commissiong Planning and Zoning Commission to review and make a recommendation to Council on the final draft General Plan. Products: Two public hearings with Planning and ZoningCommission, Public Notification and Advertising (Town Staff); presentation materials,. Task 9.3. Town Council Public Hearing properly advertised and held to adopt the Town of Oro Valley General Plan after A Town Council public hearing will be prop y the 60-dayapproved period has been completed and final revisions to the General Plan have been pp roved b Y the Town Project Manager. Products: Public hearings with Town Council, presentation materials. Task 9.4. Reproduce Final Document and Deliver Election Information and one electronic version of the final General Plan document to the Town for The Consultant will provide one original reproduction. The Town printformat a of Oro Valleywill and distribute the final General Plan document, in the approved in product specifications. The Consultant will provide a mail-out public information flyer to the Town Clerk regarding the Plan update Products:Final General Plan Document; Information flyer Task 9.5. Transmit Documents, Original Artwork and Text/Data in Digital Format and Project Closure The Consultant will transmit the final documents, CD ROMs containing the final text of the General Plan in Microsoft The Consultant will also deliver camera-ready artwork to the Town, including color, Word to the Town Project Manager.T reproducible copies ies of 8.5"x 11" or 11" x 17" artwork and pdf format so that additional copies of plan graphics hics can be reproduced by the Town. All GIS-data will be provided in a format approved by the Town GIS Analyst. Product:All electronic files and data, artwork and graphics. Scope of Work Town of Oro Valley, Arizona 8/1/01 Focus 2020 General Plan Update 17 PROJECT/PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS II work products producedduring the course of the project will become the property of the Town of Oro Valley. All project text end graphics shall be prepared on a format compatible with the software and hardware utilized by the Town. All graphical presentation drawings and similar materials shall be prepared on minimum 30"x40" presentation boards and shall be produced in colo r where necessary. Uponcompletion of the project, a completed electronic copy of the plans, associated Pan I graphics and presentation materials and GIS information shall be provided on a medial suitable to the Town. g P PROJECT/PRODUCT SUMMARY 1. Organization and Format of Deliverables All materialcollectedby the Consultant and staff shall be documented in a summary statement and/or graphic form. A loose-leaf Project Binder will be designed and maintained by the Town to document the work and shall contain all of g productsproduced for the plan. The Consultant shall work with Town staff to establish the text and material and i format to be used in the preparation of all technical reports and the general plan document. The text format graphic P P the typeface and font sizes to be used in all reports prepared for the Town of Oro Valley during this project. includes yp The graphic ra hic format and preliminary table of contents of the Town of Oro Valley General Plan will also be established. All formats will be approved by the Town Project Manager prior for use in reports. copy one One master and digital copy of all documents produced by the Consultant shall be provided to the Town. The GIS Analyst, Town Project Manager and Consultant will determine the digital format to be used. The Town shall are renotes of all meetings between the Town and the Consultant for the Project Binder. P P summary Products: Draft General Plan Document; Final Adopted General Plan Document; Executive Summary; miscellaneous items such as databases, GIS data, logos, graphics, public notices, all to be submitted and documented in the Project Binder;one(1) original and one (1)digital copy of each product F:\PROJECTS\GP20011RFQ&Scope of Work\BRW Scope of Work.doc Scope of Work Town of Oro Valley, Arizona 811/01 Focus 2020 General Plan Update 18 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: Aug. 1st, 2001 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: CHUCK SWEET, TOWN MANAGER DATE: July 31st, 2001 J: Reconsideration of Ordinance No. (0) 01-20 OV11-01-01 SUBJ: General Plan Amendment for Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood #11 SUMMARY: On 18th, 2001 the Town Council approved Ordinance No. (0) 01-20, o July - 1-01-01 therebyamendingthe Town's General Plan for Neighborhood #11 OV 1 in the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development. Since the adoption of this Ordinance the Town has received a letter from the applicant (Vistoso Partners LLC) requesting a reconsideration of the action taken on July 18th 2001 (See attached copy). Additionally, the Town Attorney has expressed some legal concerns relating to the "considerations" included in this General Plan Amendment. A separate Attorney-ClientPrivilege Privile e memorandum is being distributed to you from the Town Attorney which will outline his concerns. Robert's Rules of Order and Section IX. — MOTIONS TO RECONSIDER of the Town Council Policies and Procedures outline the process whereby previous actions of the Town Council can be reconsidered. As indicated in the attached excerpt of this section of the Policies and Procedures, "Reconsideration of any action taken (or not taken) by the Town Council may be requested only by a Council member who was on the prevailing side of the vote." The vote on July 18th 2001 was approved by a 4-0 vote, with Council Member Rochman voting on therevailin side. Council Member Rochman has indicated his request to p g reconsider this previous action of the Town Council on this evening's agenda. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Section IX. — MOTIONS TO RECONSIDER, 1. Placement on the Agenda, excerpt from Town Council Policies and Procedures. 2. Jul 31st, 2001 Letter from Vistoso Partners, L.L.C. requesting July reconsideration of General Plan Amendments for RV #11 & #12 RECOMMENDATIONS: to the legal concerns that are being brought forward by the Town Attorney's Due g office magnitude the ma nitude of the General Plan Amendment contained in OV11-01- 01, it is recommended that the Town Council approve a motion to reconsider y your action of Jul 18th 2001 regarding Ordinance No. (0) 01-20, OV11-01-01. It is further recommended that if this reconsideration motion is approved, that the appropriate action on the item itself would be to continue OV11-01-01 to the 19th � September 19 2001 regular meeting. This would allow sufficient time for the p Town Council to conduct a Study Session/Executive Session on this requested General Plan Amendment during August or early September 2001. SUGGESTED MOTION: I make a motion to reconsider Ordinance No. (0) 01-20, previously adopted by the Town Council on July 18th 2001 due to legal concerns expressed this evening. 11441 TOWN MANAGER b. Involuntary: At any time before the question is called on a pending motion, a Council member may make a motion to amend the motion. At that time the discussion of the underlying issue will stop. If there is not a second to the motion to amend, then discussion on the underlying issue will continue. If the motion to amend is adopted by a majority of the Council, discussion will continue on the (now) amended motion. If the motion to amend fails, discussion will continue on the original motion on the floor. c. VQluntary Withdrawal: At any time before the question is called on a pending motion, the Council member who made the motion may ask that his/her motion be withdrawn. The motion will be withdrawn only in the event that the Council member who seconded the motion agrees with withdrawal of the motion. 8. Calling the Question: Discussion shall end at the time the question is called, or at the time the Mayor determines that there is no further need for discussion. 9. Taking the Vote: The Mayor shall ask Council members to designate his/her vote by announcing "aye" or "nay". If, prior to the vote or after the vote, any Council member requests a roll call vote, the Clerk shall call roll, and each Council member shall state his/her vote aloud. Any abstention shall count as a "nay" vote. 10. Announcing the Result of the Vote: After the vote, the Mayor shall announce whether the motion failed or passed. If the vote was unanimous, the Mayor shall so state, and if it was not, the Mayor shall state the individual vote for the record, stating the number of "aye" and "nay" votes. 11. Tie Votes: In the case of a tie in votes on any motion, the motion shall be considered lost. The item itself may be continued to another meeting. 12. ordinance Emergency clause: Ordinances shall be prepared as provided by law. SECTION IX. - MOTIONS TO RECONSIDER 1. Placement on the Agenda: Reconsideration of any action taken (or not taken) by the Town Council may be requested only,by a Council member who was on the prevailing side of the vote. 2. Discussion and Vote on the Original Issue: If the motion to reconsider failed, the Council will skip the next agenda item, which will be the discussion and vote of the original issue. If the motion to reconsider was successful, the Council will discuss and vote on the original issue as for any other business before the Council, and any Council member may make motions on the original issue. r:1wp511councdlpdic5•6-010596-4:00 pm 8 V t! Jl!V1 14.V1 rlLl 'svv vvv V1r.1 VISTOSO PARTNERS,LLC 1121 W.Warner Road,Suite 109 Tempe,Arizona 85284 480-831-2000 480-893-1604 fax July 31,2001 Mr. Chuck Sweet Town Manager Town of Oro Valley 11000 N.LaCanada Drive Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 Dear Chuck: Vistoso Partners feels that the considerations placed on the approval of the General Plan Amendments for Neighborhood 11 and 12 would be more appropriately addressed at the PAD Amendment level. Therefore, we respectfully request that the Mayor and Council reconsider their approval sp y of these two General Plan Amendments and continue them until the corresponding PAD Amendments are forwarded to the Mayor and Council or until other circumstances dictate. Sincerely, �-- 4110 John Beerling JB1ke TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 1 AO COUNCIL COMMUNICATION C MEETING DATE:...latti4= Dc1 - HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL 10.: FROM: Bryant Nodine, AICP, Planning and Zoning Administrator Sangeeta Jain, Planner II SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE NO. (0)01- 20 , OV11-01-01 REQUEST TO AMEND THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY GENERAL PLAN FOR A PORTION OF RANCHO El T GHBORHOOD 11 BORDERED ON THE EAST, NORTH, AND WEST VISTOSO N SIDES BY THE TOWN BOUNDARY AND BY STONE CANYON III, II, AND IV ON THE SOUTH UTH ASSESSOR'S PARCEL # 21905010A,21905011 C, AND 21906014A) BACKGROUND ThisPlanningand ZoningCommission in April 2001, to amend the General Plan for a item was initiated by the o Neighborhood 11. Therequest to change the General Plan land use designation was portion of Rancho V l sto s g req made by the WLB Group on behalf of Vistoso Partners. SITE DESCRIPTION The subject parcel is approximately399 acres in size, bordered on the east, north, and west sides by the Town ndary and by Stone Canyon III II and IV on the south (see the attached map). As shown on the attached g the current General Plan designates most of this area as Parks and Open Space. The specific boundaries Tap, on the attached map are intended be an approximation of the currently approved PAD zoning for the area. LANDOWNER'S REQUEST WLB Group on behalf of Vistoso Partners, L.L.C. is requesting a General Plan amendment to change of the current land use designations approximately 60 acres of Parks / Open Space and Rural Low Density Residential to Low Density Residential. Table 1 on this page summarizes the existingand proposed land uses in the NH 11 General Plan Amendment Area. Table 2 compares the number of housingunits that could potentially be added as per the current land use designations and what the applicant is proposing. TABLE 1: NH 11 ACREAGE SUMMARY P/OS RLDR (0-0.3 Total Area DU/AC) Plan Existing General Designations 385 14 399 Proposed General Plan Designations • S Parks andOpenace 330 10 340 p Residential0.6-1.2 55 4 59 • Low Density DU/AC) TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Page 2 of 5 r' NCIL COMMUNICATION TABLE 2: NH 1 1 DWELLING UNITS COMPARISON P/OS RLDR (0-0.3 Total DU DU/AC) p _ 5 0 - 5 Potential DU under Existing General Plan 0 89 Proposed DU 83 6 Note: The areas above are based on GIS data. DU/AC-Dwelling Units per Acre P/OS—Parks/Open Space RLDR-Rural Low Density Residential LDR-Low Density Residential GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE S taffThas evaluated this proposal against the Focus 2020 General Plan and finds the following: has designated all of this area (except small Use Map: Town of Oro Valley General Plan g Focus 2020 Land P the zoningon the land and because of Parks and Open Space. This was done to reflect pockets on the south) as p p and greater and major rock sensitive nature of this area, as it has slopes 25 percent the environmentally with map and therefore the ,•+� low-densityresidential uses as proposed are not in conformance � sops. The with the existing Stone Canyon low-density wiredThe proposed��dment is required. p posed uses are compatible „sidential development to the South. GP will have a significant impact on the existing open space. on Open Space: The proposal to amend the o lam. e Impact p P in the middle of the project area, thereby leaving tw g However, the development has been concentrated areas, and other avoids development in steeper slopes, floodplains,riparian • pockets of open space, and the proposalis between 60 acres (counting ' ' (as shown in the attached map). The total impact on open spacesensitive areas those open ace areas connected to larger open open space areas) p p small contiguous p and 90 acres (counting only space areas byat least a 300' corridor of open space). is about 85 more than the maximum possible in Units: The proposed number of dwelling units In1pact on Dwelling under the current land use designations. Urba- GrowthBoundary: � Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) follows the southern ' As per the General Plan, the n UGB ".......is a line that indicates any land north ofthe area. The General Plan states that the • edge of the projectover what currently exists. The purpose of the not receive anyincrease in density or land use intensity l line should within the area. Therefore, it is strongly UGB was to ensure rural character preservation of the land recommended that the Town Council and otherjurisdictions consider and honor the existing resident's wishes to maintain the rural character of the area......... " limits of urban infrastructure and services, A xi urban growth boundary should designate the existing or planned infrastructure ends at the southern boundary of this proposed h a s sewer and water. Currently, the south of the land. The infrastructure to the .nendment area and will have to be extended north fordevelopment However, a reservoir site will be required for water service anda is of sufficient size to serve the development. condition to this effect is included in Exhibit 'A'. F:\ov\ovinnomi-oi-olutvil GP July 18 TC.doc TOWN OF ORO VALLEY r 'N CIL COMMUNICATION Page 3 of 5 AMENDMENTS TO AND UPDATE OF THE GENERAL PLAN "the amendment will be based on the following [four] inFocus 2020, granting of a general plan As stated findings of fact". Finding overall improvement to the general plan and is of Fact #1: That the amendment constitutes an not solely for the benefit of a particular landowner or owners at a particular point in time. ' Applicant States: that the development as presented will allow for the development of a low-density Appl�ca high-end resort oriented community, which ch exp resses the Town's desire to project aresidential/resort character. ' use designation to the Town will be derived from the Analysis: The benefits for changing the land g • . StaffS � � loss of open space and help to mitigate the attached considerations in Exhibit A , which balance the p p impacts ns the amendment benefits the applicant, but it still of development. Without these considerations, provides the following benefits to the Town: • thatprovides a relatively high tax base for the services that are required • Residential development and a relatively lar , one-time fiscal impact and fees; from construction sales tax . g , unit , and • enhancement of the Towns image and character as a destination, resort co y, • development that will helpto attract high-end, specialty retail investment iswith the vision, goals, and policies of the general ' of Fact #2: That the amendment consistent Finding plan. s to all the applicable goals a Applicant States: This amendment conform pp nd policies of the General it is easier to build within sensitive areas of slopes greater Plan. Also, with the available technology, � dinthan 25 ercent without destroying the surroun g areas. This amendment will provide a jobs P housing balance within the Town. • amendment will provide jobs/housing balance as per the Staff Anal sis: It is unclear as to how this • Analysis: proposal against the goals and policies of General Plan applicant. Regardless, Staff has evaluated this p p g . pp Exhibit `A' conforms to 21 of the 26 applicable the proposal (with the considerations is )and finds that p p policies (see the attached General Plan Conformance Checksheet). Finding map of Fact #3: That the general plan land use does not provide appropriate optional sites for the use proposed in the amendment. Applicant States: that the general plan land use mapdoesnot provide any other optional sites for the use proposed in the amendment. • and a high-end resort in NH 11 has altered Staff Analysis: The development of the golf coursefive-star, g y in land use mapdoes not provide optional sites for the land uses this area. The General Plan low-densityhousing with a golf course and a resort. development of this kind of high-end, F:\oV\OV i 1\2001U1-01-01\RV 11 GP July 18 TC.doc TOWN OF ORO VALLEY T COUN CIL COMMUNICATION Page 4 of 5 r„id•ng of Fact #4: That the amendment will not adversely impact the community as a whole, or a � acceptable means of mitigating these impacts through the portion of the community without an p subsequent zoning and development process. • amendment will have apositive impact on the community as a whole. It will Applicant States: that the . . ' ' bylimitingdevelopment in physically buildable areas and limiting preserve sensitive areas p encroachment into open space. Staff Analysis: Amending the General Plan land use map designation to a higher density may have adverse impacts on the environmentallysensitive areas of the Town and adjoining areas to the west, north and east. In evaluating this amendment, mitigation of impacts were considered by adding development standards to the proposal attached in Exhibit 'A'. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENTS: notification regarding As required by State statue, publicg g the proposed amendment was given to adjacent property owners within 600 feet, posted on the site, published in the local paper and posted at Town Hall. Staff also notified members of Sector Boards 4 and 5. No comments were received except those from Sector Board members as reported in the section entitled Sector Board Meeting below. htNNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ACTION: On June 5, 2001, the Planning and ZoningCommission held a public hearing on this proposal and 'n the land use designations, thereby amending the General Plan. The recommended approval (4-1) of changing g , . „ Planning and Zoning Commission motion recommended changing Exhibit 'A' from "conditions of approval (i.e., requirements that must be fulfilled) to "considerations” (suggestions for future development review and approval). This change is reflected in Exhibit 'A'. SECTOR BOARD MEETING On May 10th, held a meeting with the members of Sector Board 4 and 5, the committees who led the planning area. Byconsensus the boards were opposed to the proposed General plan updates in 1996 for this p g change. They stated that, if the Town chose to go forward with the amendment, it should do so only if the amount of open space dedicated to the Town is 3 to 5 times what is used for the proposed development. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: pp Staff recommends that the Town Council approve this item with the considerations listed in Exhibit 'A'. TOWN MANAGER RECOMMENDATION: Due to the magnitude of the General Plan Amendment contained in OV11-01-02 and taking into consideration Council Members will be present at the July 18, 2001 regular meeting, it is �t only four of the five commended that this agenda item be continued to either the August 15 or September 5, 2001 regular meeting. This will allow sufficient time for the full Town Council to hold a Study Session on the specifics of this General Plan Amendment. F:\OV\OV 11\2001\11-01-01\RV 11 GP July 18 TC.doc TOWN OF ORO VALLEY r'f'1 TNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 5of5 ,UGGESTED MOTION: The Council maywish to consider one of the following motions: Amendments to the 1996 General Plan, to the regular Town I move to continue Ordinance No. (0)01-jQ_, Council allow sufficient time for the Town Council to hold a study meeting of , thereby session on this matter. -or- neral Plan changing the land use designation on the move not to adoptg g Ithe Amendments to the 1996 Ge • Neighborhood 11, and to deny Ordinance No. (0)01- 20 , hern ortlon of a parcel known as Rancho Vlstoso gno p finding that: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ordinance No. (0)01- 20 2. Exhibit 'A': Considerations of Approval for OV11-01-01 3. Exhibit 'B': NH 11 Proposed General Plan Amendment Area 4. Exhibit 'C': NH 11 Existing & Proposed Land Uses General Plan Conformance Checksheet frhi . ' )3/1-1 Plannin. 1 . Zoning ' dministrator /Li ... 11... - / ' nity Devel c ent Director Town Manager F:\OV\OV11\2001\11-01-01\RV11 GP July 18 TC.doc ORDINANCE NO. (0)01-20 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE LAND USE MAP OF THAT DOCUMENT KNOWN AS "FOCUS 2020: TOWN OF ORO VALLEY GENERAL PLAN, JULY 1996"FOR A PORTION OF RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 11; FIXING THE EFFECTIVE DATE THEREOF; AND REPEALING ANY OTHER ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH. WHEREAS, the Town of Oro Valley adopted a document known as the "Focus 2020: Town of Oro Valley General Plan, July 1996"; and WHEREAS, it has become necessary to revise, amend and update this document due to a request for an alternate land use for that parcel known as a portion of Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 11; WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, having considered an amendment to the Land Use Map of the Town of Oro Valley General Plan relative to the appropriate land use designation for thatroperty known as a portion of Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 11; and having held a public p hearing on said map amendment; and having made its recommendations to the Town Council; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY: SECTION 1. The Council hereby adopts a revised Land Use Map as a part of that certain document known as "Focus 2020: Town of Oro Valley General Plan, July 1996". Said map revision shall reflect a land use designation on that parcel known as a portion of Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 11, as described in Exhibits B and C. Three copies of the revised Land Use Map of said document are on file in the office of the Town Clerk of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona. SECTION 2. The effective date of the revised Land Use Map shall be on the date of approval of a PAD amendment based on the considerations listed in Exhibit 'A'. SECTION 3. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of the ordinance or any part of the Land Use Map amendment adopted herein is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. SECTION 4. That all ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be repealed to the extent of such conflict. ORDINANCE NO. (0)01-70 (Continued) PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley,Arizona this 1e day of July, 2001. Paul H. Loomis,Mayor ATTEST: Ka A n Cuvelier, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: IleerDan Dudley,Town a ttorney PUBLISH: Daily Territorial July 31, August 1, 2, 3, 2001 POSTED: July 27 - August 26, 2001 rg (0)01-20 p.3 EXHIBIT 'A' OV11-01-01 AMENDMENT TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY GENERAL PLAN FOR A PORTION OF RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 11 CONSIDERATIONS FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT At the time of PAD amendment 1. Vistoso Partners will secure and dedicate to the Town the ITC Area(in the north RV Neighborhood 12 area). 2. Vistoso Partners will dedicate land within their property for, and provide funds to construct, a trail system startingfrom a two-acre trailhead near the southwest portion of Neighborhood 11 and connecting, via northern Honey Bee Wash, to Honey Bee Canyon Park. The trailhead and the trail alignment will be that which is acceptable to the Town in consultation with Pima County Parks and Recreation. 3. Vistoso Partners will dedicate an acceptable site for a water reservoir in neighborhood 11. The General Plan designation for that site will be amended to Public/Semi Public by this amendment. 4. Vistoso Partners will dedicate the area from the south and west ridgeline of Honey Bee Wash, or from 300' south and west of the centerline of the wash, whichever is less, to the north and east boundaries of the property. 5. There will be at least 300 feet wide contiguous areas of open space left as wildlife corridors along riparian areas unless mitigation measures or existing conditions (topography, vegetation, etc.) adequately buffer the riparian areas from the effects (lights, noise, etc.) of development. All street crossing of riparian areas shall be designed to be wildlife friendly by providing: a. shrubs up to the shoulders b. speed limits of 15-20 mph c. culverts or other structures where the length is no more than two times the width (for wider roads [longer crossings] this may mean providing a light well at the median) d. sandy-bottomed, square culverts or at least large, sandy bottomed, '/2 or '/4 round culverts e. as an option, a 2'-3' culvert-type crossing for smaller animals such as javelina in conjunction with an area on either side of the drainage level with the roadway and enhanced with vegetation to provide an area where larger animals can cross. f. as an option, pavement materials that mimic native materials 7. All rock outcrops identified in the Harris Study shall have 50 feet buffer around at least 75% of their circumference. 8. No buildings shall be visible from the floodplain of Honey Bee Wash. 9. Grading limits of no more than 20,000 square feet shall be imposed on all lots. Other 10. The approval of this General Plan amendment does not constitute an approval of the number of lots or the layout of lots as submitted, which will be evaluated at the PAD amendment request. In particular those lots in the northern area of the proposal will be evaluated to determine if there is an adequate buffer to the public lands and wildlife corridors. (0)01-20 p.4 to a)� Q W 48 a> ,7, J i as 4 ca, . '"E" E 0-, —.7- r (A CD -0 .- , 16i• 0 c a. Ce 0 Fe Q8 '12 T.:....., .4.co > i limi Boz C Clei _--, DO ,-,,,7„, 0.) CI 0N E r'''''''''' .......iie 1 ..........il........... ................ IV C a) al E 1--- <, , co cl. N FIRS ..... 0 °\'' oys\NpN Cl)X "0 , so Qd•5N 0 ON0 o 1LE am ____,FLn I0 w � 0 0 Z N (0)01-20 p.5 , / ///// W // J , to/,, , z --- _,...... . ,0 / 1 a)U) ; / ,..$ M ? / 40.. , / , . . . e.- / / t E as 1 10 vA/,/ .'" , 10 No *- u) g w V d m d - 46 C •*40.1 9 CO / 1/7�./ . w > > < c0np s Nit d N d m N • J �J � � � � Cl",,, to0aao0 O. 73 � ,� j /$/.1,)4 a• � o - 7c 4\ii t. it- 0 r‘ %_ vf"' 0 I; (/) j/r \ , t ir4U ,- a— 11 , 3 w 2 / IN \ks, y verttMteN z ' Zvii- . , 04; aJd 2 CK6 0 0 \ '\`- latk\ I X \ / Ti H es 1--- CL ,,, , ... • ..... 0 N Le. y .... CIL ,‘4, 414 ,„,„ i . / ,,,,,,iNio ,re\ >06 / 04 \ W � ....*aN CI •._x / \NN\ / 0\N w Re— ARe-a I z L. 0 . Oilk—Ci-0.1 - 3 -\.) IA 11 GENERAL PLANCONFORMANCE CHECKSHEET Conformance LAND USE ELEMENT s `a<.:: ;,S .�:z<•:��:.. � ., .YS ,�.�, o.c-�rl,,,n4Y'•�r.�:,rrri'o•Fu r,»ro..�.,. 's`• ,.,rte M,,� .l:,:.r•r r<•> '�'.s„7,k. ,...�,y, ry. ,c.�>,>M M.an;. < ;,sv< <_���i.ry�s' 3. ^'� ''Py+:.�a Er� ��'s'><<: K'/ � •,c. '"�'t..•x. ';%i:�;•. <>., ,r.or.•.a, �. _�'�;,.l�„ 3K��:^5''/'.C..Y� �/:�:YFM�;�r�t.��;r�`y. rx.�a. r.:a-.. frc:- ., .. ,.:.-.`•+�•.. r....�.p... .<. .t ...r.'...:.�•'._'-'�+')� ',•,�,_�- -�,..<<�,,,:���i'•'^�"'.ii :.!-''•Y itn:r:+w.: (c:f�.:'•,%��i.:�^. rGgJ:w<,7.., ;c w...,....� f� v_ !O�ilr}�': ..r.,:.,.ii../ uv,: -n.:, .;3 Fk:•"v:,�,j.c,.,..,Y•5:l��'f!"^':^.l"^}.ra4nC, - _ .;<a*•.•7., ,/;,�.•/�Yi•:^♦y,.fCr..•.'�t�T�f .>/x,. �•t ,. �.9:_ N �>>`�� Y -r•6i:,:�, �.. ��<t�- .�",,:-•:��.,,...��.,,G.. /�p IU o D� arm i<w a^ a s> Y.= ..'�i. i. 1,e nic, ✓s..>•:.. •r.•:w ,!•c*.i•-/•v,: >eYl> .�. w o'n r;a w- x :c •!"^'. i7.•�s<1. <, r,rv' - :). ^<q,, e/�, `��I•' <`G�<> •'fif. ;Drr �^' - ro a ;• :eLs2>.. n �. S�•- .,s.�.�i.-K�.'�-r..>z.�., ..� :c�f.,z'ta 4 �•,r :<h :: �'J,.5::' ,Q• �.�. ••:»>';:'-._i•c...�•' 'W >.��.r .,,�'' c.<«✓ aillrr ^�. _r..- G• ..ya%:, 5,: :..�'�3:' "^4'a •`M?�-C. Pres ry .�,: � / ,n,,.�>. s:>+` :�: -c >ts'3�'•"ac .-1,�.t_' .-s,•', �Y •..�Lx.c'° 'i3-.• ,N.a °»53','= ,af<w 7 ,,r'. .•.rs-t!•� - 4 / .,'L. G.. v:,.i::.••a..'yl. .,q.CP"�• ++wY' O r.r .M •�;::. • s•• „r• :•rte.. _ �.,,.] .i"QY.,, /< �/- a]1,.�. .r``,u,.,''t��: yy �. 'L✓ �.>w. .�{.i•.....:af.:,. r ',��%i:r7',,, `•�v-:s�<'' .o ) / >� ::y'.;y.•,.1Y•a^'}!J^' - f _'•�,•�.r' ,y ^ti7� .�'� •!vi ._' }.!':- :r.. r .! ��r_�^ �:� ,y.•r.>�7aS'„7.•. �f% ,..7.:4":k�.. rf - ;:1�Y. .s r>••. •jS��K`��� �: -:•S,r „�� .�.; Y'."': y ;3Y,y.., , _ ,,�;��` ,�. ?;i<+:1�...:•. '•:iF• :K>-,., �f.3r,a.. +'.x:�;�1 (� a Ifs:..X..a'i,•�re'f':T'v.., ^, ::!' ,'>tc .,�c'Y:.i .l;:^%;�'a'>, 4`l':<'../-`+•i •h,}_J-•-. :a.•f vyi...,.�'• a/� m j'� -�7. - , f,,.w•., ��b.P'1':,`�+,,`iS"<,,,,, A,/,fes. v:_ ,A.,,,,,,,r... r R r.S i>. YJ>i U�t� •C©7il J>./���_ gc�wr-.�•ifi♦:•i� t '�.1.- •=i��:�><^•.:fi•i:.::,ir'+�YX�r I..t':.'�- %F.y'„�.a'...r�'�.r�:.....,....r,., . ,, .. ...,.... , ,,,s . .. o i„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,„--,,,,,-4...--,n r, '� >n.,a:�.r.:-•��`'g•,F,�!'•r•...,•.e�,.�s?,r1 .,»r•,F�... r•*... density)developments to protect environmentally sensitive areas. Clustering is ak..) ol�cy 1.1B Promote clustering(average P and bulk re uirements,provided there is no increase development design technique that permits a reduction in lot area q or multi-family ��s��, 6.-g2-- developments, in the number of lots,and the remaining land area is devoted to open space. In large-lot are in clustering may also be accomplished by placing building pads close to each other as mechanismsa. sa. place to protect remaining open space. 'olicy l.lC Clusters should be encouraged for the preservation of significant,passive use,natural open space within residential neighborhoods. The integration of natural open space within clustered developments should promote openness within C the housing development. OverlayZone(HDZ)grading and development standards shall be considered at the time of 'otic l.lD The Hillside Development HDZ standards. �� y - rezoning and shall supersede when a conflict exists between the land use map and the uni 'otic 1.1E View protection shall be an essential aspect of Oro Valley's community design review and project approval. G for development compatibility,safety,and preservation as natural open - 'olicy l.lN Slopes 15%and greater shall be evaluated ` 6, C p P space. Policy 1.11 Oro Valle}J shallencourage the use of building envelopes in master planned communities,which encourages natural between housingunits. Building envelopes designate the specific area that can be disturbed in any way during buffers C., or following construction. The area outside the building envelope must be maintained in a natural state. atural rollingterrain and emphasize low-density developments in these areas. C... poi;- 1.1K Consider development impacts on n r � x f k IF ��+' v Y t<"•�>` •�w.aY��'Y ,Ir<>�.7'+riwf.<>.s ..r.• . '?�' '•iii `•'+Gi��y�'v�./s%`r YaS'.�<�..F <<•#4i ,i. ii..�:� �t:� c:'' 4•. k -,i•c,e..i. .«.'}ia..�' a!+...,'y'<r.. <'^ ,,y.r• �'k .:f:�.. s. rs o .,>. . !•tra, �. >.e u.: t r i •”Z f• :)' 1•s..`!tr-"i Ute:�• ��,1c .rr�•2::<�.f. : int'A rr T:V�a '<. s.:�..ix 3.::.s:. a in DC of �.. g. N.:� ori, 2 :I�oJ��V ♦ �.�- 'i�;iyX. ,.,�3 •.:w:A.:� .r.�<1�,<7..,r-c:••s<::...ii,.r:.. r...;i 1.•,..a,.�''/�r • y � �� .-D Encourage the location of residential neighborhoods close to activity centers to minimize travel times. Policy 1.2A g transportation corridors. Policy 1.2F Locate higher density land uses and transportation dependent uses near major trans P Strip commercial developments are discouraged and clustering of commercial developments at specific nodes or Policy 1.2H s P -��. villages that are planned with strict aesthetic and design guidelines are encouraged. Freestanding pads are g discouraged,except when expressly permitted in relation to overall gross leasable area and center design. . .-.:�/•r,.:,r.+'r a i'�-�.:a.r,.�:vii..✓•s!:.-i'r�Sw F�.�,�,`sem,.c,♦t riia`'es+f ...: .:., .... .'.ro r au.''il.9,ic« .•..,..:..?3:!'...,� .:},^Srx�, �'�,4,;'�;+.Y i „r,4 3'>s'<:•>{•k L�v*1V r.~'rtY''�.h'�w;ii°4 r/ y i',l\•�K.x�' ��:-b•JC�at+"y✓ �}�. �,;: y,.�s r.,..„_i. .v>,,i .�r.:39`tS .r.,.� {ira�Xs �C"'-!.4f. iz-i!':4+a. vV Y r , ri; ru :rr,•rc. ,k. Q`� <. r.>>.%y>y�:>n )< ,!'•"+' ;�-' .r.. fl,� •.�. / .J�.�-:�•f '•f.,e.:.tt'�•> �C� v,' .;�'"'^S: YY• 4r✓ ✓�♦ ! irU �P:. � T n7.!. Jam` � ..�,.!• .,!,i -R ... _yt•< •su�o- .xt1"».7�! �•Y�� .�'� Z� .:f'ti'� .3. :4>-'I.'''<:�.. �S: P\.r./ •.�H' :f: .� A.:>+r...4, ) •i ix"71'i?Z .%�%•� .3:. r.'•!•. s:�,<. �:.w�^ > -t.f�:':. y,, .�.«:. ::. n •rr';• :'V;i( •f.T,f•.^ .i ,.�.!�Q't lr -:>... r: ,..�x. �:.. •'r•,, ..,a ,r-a. Y `�a•' :xis��� '� i. �'y-.%.Y r� L-.Ll_ w• ,tM,a.;I, i' .,. •� 7....;:)r• £ i � 'i cL.•`'(:..t*�F:�44�l�.,.7.•:`r"F ,.f<.• ::,i-.37:4,...,:,.,;:,,,,.:;-„, %;(♦�a �!�r,•L•SKYiy%i 1r. �.. :t7._•,l :,:' ••yiw.:;:`!>1 4 N �" •r1,+ ..:�•,J J:,.l..��' � } � '�M����W �H:i,T�:.KI,:� Sh� •�'•.:� r� >�_ .:w '�'',rt.. •.-,yF:.a r..l?-"" :.«.'�+74'Y�:.'�'.:y�p�•.t�' ...N, :. ; ..7..:'!': Ir-atn:�>frls .y�:..,k :�..'. w:x;-.�,.. :�� :..� ... ._.. .............. �.�, ,t..>ti, f v int la n d,- D a t g, z tfgt 5 a,. . -.,,._�:_ �oai�'.�"GCyi`:'tIG, �P•Y��O'�:Y O�llV ,'�it�(F11'�.�i'.���t'+14a'�L" iX^jn'y�',�i����.�� "�;,y ...3�•%.'.ti!''�kr' "fa;�:irsr,9_ r•e.3?!...N.,,. �'., �a+r.r.Z'i'•"''+r,.•��-',`_l.�i"'�'"'?��L'II'�i.'r /N•,..'.'..t., :I+�YY.�..... ............, f• .,/., adequacy of school facilities shall be developed as a finding for all residential land use requests Policy l.3D An evaluation of the adeq y 1•.).4)before the Planning and Zoning Commission at the time of rezoning. One elementary,school site of at least 10 acres should be reserved within developments for every 500 elementary Policy 1.3E school level students forecasted to live within the development. N Pt rian access to school sites from open space,parks,and neighborhoods. IN Policy 1.31 Ensure safe bike/pedestrian ^.. • .>• s..<.iy..7. �.e.. . r.'x.<. . ...x..:.:':•!,.,......•>... �, . ..�._...t< <.> .::.i..:'> Nl.rF4::,^?i:k. h, ,,,: �.y.`.:4:I 'V Ye •'-^.Y%`:•.••✓<av v/..„fitr > � ;,,jdam^', .. ,, y>^•„- ,9i'yam Y�� �F S� �... '. < -» 6a '''''''''7.,::',:::;1.C.;.1.944 .':',:',7, .Ytgpi-pp-et1 dW h . .♦s. a tft , ernf.tofinu : �t , fal� - �. a : . :r: , i zt.!i .ry r (,r. .v` ,ri . Y: r . �.�� >~,r ”}�:. `,� v .� � ..�. . � .s�'.� i4• •"• �. x. t i N ._ �y! rev . :w% a . !• >. rir: .Vi{i, > 1. ar<:� �r4n.-gs .tba*: Policy 1.4A The longterm fiscalimpactsJ evaluated to the Town and its taxpayers relating to proposed new dev elopments shall be C.. as a criterion in deciding the approval or denial of land use rezoning proposals. :onformance:C=conforms_D=Doesn't Conform;NA=not applicable;U=unknown,too close to tell,etc. lake any notes regarding conformance on the back of the sheet. .‘.,4...,;„v7\rnui‘nc\Tl pve1nnmenl Review\General Plan Conformance Table.doc Page 1 J . . • GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE CHECKSHEET .'.3vi•-,,<. CIRC.a.i.Ut. L. A; TI ONIT'`,-RANr...r:.-SPORTATION E`Lr; EM. ENT :.:' Z7. t y'-s7Y.""•.. , . � .•. y^� ,.a"•..'l�;,< Conformance t A_M67rn^44c_�Vi ,',A,: ag :it . aK� i �,4�-. F . ;Pr't )x �� �.�� .i.IPg�.u,, �.i'`;W.o+:. '. r.0" �?ia� !wlt�y '=�'.:i ?.3v}•„•a. O.> F%.�tJ1 • �7 , r - . � ;44,,,,,•�_ .QO1f � :_.n "�- {� . ` i Netei ���w , �TDOn.« noftiZi 'rak,_�: 5� a�, i : 3-�'�� Z% 1 C"' ♦ <._=r.:.t•5� + .r:Ftr•., .h•>':.•rrr, !i? 2 � `4.`a?" «f•i•a.r'�'..r'.^ r� c.:.rA .a . Na " : .� :r.r -T 'fY .� F ,: '.�`� i'ce'3 , ar41 r�wtthina ridth rowgh the cjt�Yr �. " . � ^M?s: d�1V .�-i^:rr�ra 3� is',;,•�rb7C .. .�a�LnY-'; ^r�,.,�< F�^amo` L`Y.e!M +fG:,S:�.r. 0�r � .r , ,:';.. t:,r�,,Fr,.-4..>,.f.,,:..,.,. ',_i',.;m.^x;•vti :ff+i, . : ..,r.7`-y: . ,.v:o'.a.w.♦. c .n,•. .,rf ..d,. r�� s sufficient outside lane width,and provide other specific provisions for safe and convenient use of Dlicy 2.1D Build sidewalks, 1\)arterials and collectors by bicyclists and pedestrians. olicy 2.1E Bike,vehicle and �•Jlpedestrian edestrian c o..,nf;icts are to!be min._ ..: ,.rthrough appropriate:.R-•� s.. d.•.esign standards. rds.'• sb. ...-_c..��.,r..`+.'�.l4,,, 1► .,: TV Pi: �i_1 � Y:gf ?a «t y t, 4argo r�. �t ^ T :r�4?'pg4ira4lY�. NrL� '� �,��t )iA! ff,�r'-RA ;oa2�. tg �eStgiva,traDPo 1iAn, pi � r3in 'pr01l,gvt e eutrtxngow '. " - '"` n��� �� �r� ,?� ,.-, , >�vf"tV�;s}ya�P•°v4 X�� , "�,;">,�r��,.,Y✓ .^V•�2�.!*?�ria.r;�h��3",^i,<..�'t7. , a',..,af�: -'nwA' ^«»W ..TOestvM'' s.�P4:4,,,� ii`� A ✓y� �%t�J�' }:,, r� yt . be constructed,where feasible,to separate bike and pedestrian traffic from motorized vehicles in olicy 2.3B Bike paths shouldTV korder to provide safe access to schools and parks. 'olicy 2.3C All new or reconstructed collectors and arterials should include sidewalks. N Pr : •k - ;1C^ . ;a ,,tA` :.3..'t� 7r;tFjwn�✓jai ;*vrr -,,,,'.r.,'•.�,,t, ' 4rf : .r, sr+otrK"ati - .:�l �wrr.F.„k=•-rJti:3 ,..ts• w 1 `.i✓s -'r .,•:^a:L v tt ('W IZt:V r�Rv n:K ��-,;•t3l.:.^A..�.f ,-rr..,.-AY. , ♦rfat.•�Cye :.ec > ft,S.4 yfil. e. :r'S.y � ']. tl<. _,. a•7 ., .a , JVi � y � :.e �7j7n .a 7. , r :tO �eiL •k, � >� ,b � : '_ T�Ld .eY. r ' nf^aYYhhC�' 6 ,,`i, YI •ce t - r < 7/ : M ;v ��� gf' r? �. ke oa11 7''r$s ,� avToim •� �! lM�=.tff4ir: •� fi�:;T" � -yr ! R .l '4i. k wa ,LAr �rYuY � �y should be an essential as ect of Oro Valley's transportation design process. Where possible, 'olicy 2.1D View protection P permanent protection of scenic vistas is to be encouraged,especially from the Oracle Road scenic corridor. Road construction on slopes should minimize the visual impact of the roadway. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT _ r�r �y ry <r �,t��.<�a.. .:y,a: t:•r'r .r <Apy:r{% --.;.r. .w ►:�4•<r y.:3ivcw..<g!t.>• ,.7, :,a,,:: l�y�✓'�';a�`tr` '.t✓<Fs,�i !�•a>,n�'�'s�h�4 :�' :-Y..i•"Cr,'•:'.xr„ n '':r� =z;. �ry ♦a .;. s:•/�•..v� �- :or^.•� �a�>r•:!r•.''N,F.�, ';: <f .:r x:r :t..=...,a.a.a,.;... ..�_, K%:r1 T :1 .a„r:3'. ,,,-, .: ':i•,r<rr: -%•it' t:.of<i Z... ''),1<y r/Af' ?'�;. �^...Y. '''a."'N:<'A. ..R✓.. i v t. _.�... :f^ r•..JI,?,. �. ....� a..},a.7+"�,3' ',r: :r. ,.h• .FIs .S' �`"t ;.: is s r';•t,«: •«vt.-r. ,.FC*,�'."i.`!... _.r.. �: lei':�. ��.. _..: stat �.< �.. .� ciao an M� ::r �n:a�n e to k ��, .x :�s.�'r,�(i�� .�r15S�'Tc'SA _. To e n$u r. ��:f4....,< . 'rb � ) f^L.J^�:f^' 3= Q?` _. '�,,. Joa��•� f y,.a 4qi f�: i '].'�,'t'` �i•'""f..'f.�.s '^f-. r 1F Maintain and enhance Oro Valley's residential/resort/recreation character. impact anal sis for significant development proposals. C y 3.1H Prepare economic developmentp Y Policy 3.1Employment-related Em to ment-related uses are encouraged to provide work places for a growing employment base. Office itechnical,and corporate employment facilities shall be compatible and consistent with the scale of the , surrounding area. Campus-type employment - ]o ment centers that emphasize a unified architectural theme,pedestrian orientation,inward- %PT transportationpatterns,atterns,and a natural landscaping theme are encouraged. These employment centers do not include high-rise structures or heavy industrial uses. , Policy 3.1K Heavy industrial and outdoor commercialuses that require significant infrastructure,introduce greater truck traffic,and are visually and environmentally incompatible with the Town's vision are generally unacceptable. $i. Fl- , - Policy 3.1L Institutional uses,such as colleges or health care,are desired and will be actively pursued and supported when located in appropriate locations. 14 Pr similar to St.Phillips Plaza in Tucson,is encouraged in appropriate locations. N ct Policy 3.1M Specialty commercial development, P HOUSING ELEMENT ,,r•„ ..�i <:. <i�!tL.'l f:<: -:w:, Y>� '.•+`.''�41'c-'r' .<.t Y .t-lk5.a: it ,f: .r f'i::ti:L.,.� ,=<,.,� .z~: ;S iC .c '♦::�Et R •1. fC!>>;L�lC s`�t f:�,1>�..'�ra'Sf�w�'' � .'�h�,ti+. . . ....,.-..'.•.':Y -.�:• .. ::: .:-,.' .,... ":.,�..,:•%.v�:.. ..r ta,t.rc)!3=•l• �''•f6' '..�"bMvLy!,.,;.+)te�.`•t,.):n!;a€=,'!.7Nt•,ti,t::Cf' .1•r•s,.::>fc.a,...ir: �ii<dM.sz•` ,�k:i;�_ :.f +.»d''.` �- .? '?.f. ..E�'.s •. :,iy ,-r.';?"`:K;4:: •',,1,•:.,• „I,,�ii.,•)..w;w..i[<..r i,.,f.w+ f..;s.. r .... ...:,:. ,�,..:=.,K/.,,A.ti„A,,:..<:.,,A<.,l• r,t�� .Y :.4.11.x.Y I <^'.d.. h I M. �••1�••M7.. 1. j M �� v<'A{.,�,i4).''C ,S7!��, a .t': �-f' tb!kL^:':.:�i1.. �t,'�`�a:.:L"'.` is '.t2 ,�`•.. .,fr.. :r.�f 1.• :•:.�.... •f.,(,a�.. .L:' .•s::�! - ..7.: -f•. •v+ .:i!f' �...: .y�,.�.. .'�C"•rr :S:•�;r;?.•/: r �a: .r•.,,:f^ ,r.+ <+t �¢•J" �.. .,� _ rA' G. i,...i/'n% '.:"Z1t;� 7v',�.T ^,�L;�. •1.' <•:. �. .a'''J!..,, ..C, 1!1" 1�.R:.w), •��+'�w4..sig �a,.,,}�������. +''t•.Y. •l.a•.,....• �. ff:.'r� k ve.t:.?.f. J.:..ti�.. !' O.':7 � ,�1, ..`:: ♦,; `Li'.'C!Yi';�4'it,•?S- .'�' ��1:ivw> -.v'.> ,a.:..!...A.?et .♦ :i•" .'Ci••.•' '� � :,.. .0"�F% ...)r ..... ,�, ��'t1�S... .a,...�.>:.s..«. .:......t ..;.... .,:...,. /�r .)i� IA> ::,ix .,w.'�R:% .ii'4:` �r!.!w- e,7rP'•w 4 '� �'t:r ,,,. :v..*., >L'a, :.,r,.Ya.S a!' > r. •v: »yf;;y t„�.% N.�::` :s y.t ,._�r.:�`...�.'i:...,°�.+�•`.:i. •c r :x: �Vi�,'h� `t'.i!t•.'�.te',S,`� ..lv:$t:'�.� :�;.,,.='1'•<?'`s•:i= .,rS�t'. •.T,:ir'"•t%�'•:o. . ..w. � �•v {�j�.`. Y] �Agr�esrderi#tai:-r�er -� �. �. � .�: ._ . ... -'T '< !i'' �A � 1, .. ,. w,%�• .... .: .. . • � r �] r )Y < ro hi ote h ix.;.. s, �. - oal.•�..f.�".� a.,. .:��'. :•'c.,.ryr'-t a• .>b«f4� .bj�•!::�<a..^.-�.-!:?b.1�sr.7✓''':�r�'f�N�'T"?"��r:;�:'.�,C';t..,. .<••,,,1 w;7e..Ao< ... . .. , !<; o� -'1 .. i,ra!•r'.A7�r q rr..✓Y. f4., .ie... •.�"a ... ........• ...... ,, y context of existingneighborhoods through the use of appropriate buffers.Policy 4.1A Protect the integrity and aesthetic g . Apartment and condominium developments should have built-in recreational facilities and other amenities to serve Policy 4.1C p residents. N Pr ' r .. ::,..: sw. ,.Z..t.!�rR t4.'',, i.. f..'. �}; ..i a�*>a ,<u ,a r �' •.,.,: ..E :. '. : �; ..+ `ter<,<... w:ti ♦ .X•: e` der;Opo Va�l�e re t±o ; >�.:: ' �� �< obslhousm ba lance:within the a ry g :: . .•' ensure:a , , .... .. Po', 1.2A Encourage the provision of a variety of housingchoices matched to employees within a reasonable proximity of employment sites. --P onformance:C=conforms;D=Doesn't Conform;NA=not applicable;U=unknown,too close to tell,etc. lake any notes regarding conformance on the back of the sheet. e\neveinnment Review\General Plan Conformance Table.doc Page 2 > GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE CHECKSHEET f.::;.-:,....:'--,..-:•:- PU ..B.�wL.:. IS.C�-. F A•Cay.•;I:E..L(TIE4Si S AND SERVICES ERVICES ELEMENT Conformance 1-• , . ^•Sv7,y; :-s.4 �q4,7tr^ cv mo "�••r�4���t �� f11!.<�. 0.,,� -44s{J? �voyyetw„'°Jy �4 � ^_�4.r- ' z�,,�✓Y�"" e,;i'< � F ' ensue..Tht declsp . .t ; rrAkra�fy , r�? �' eF. t`'D`^ ; . -ta. a ^ t,•,: *X� rh4.�, ,W .i, :: .t.$ ,.:. . , _ districts within the Oro Valley Planning Area,define both school service areas and of icy 5.1 C In cooperation with the school implementation school needs that can potentially be met through proactive p lementation at the time of development f Pr review_ olicy 5.1D Ensure that municipal services and facilities are or can be provided efficiently and cost-effectively prior to development occurring. C., new developments should be evaluated to determine impacts on all Town infrastructure,including but not limited ol�c} S.IE All P 1\)Pr to schools and roads. Such impacts shall be used as a criterion in deciding the approval or denial of land use rezoning proposals. PARKS,OPEN SPACE,AND RECREATION ELEMENT 1',. .. .. .+.r' .`. .fx..�.y.y:..'._..,^ f.,•. ::��..:�:.::.�•��..:�r�Y t�..:.a,•.: s'V, Z %w404'W :�e •. ;yt,.�. -�J -1, g+�� s� r uV y...a li. ?.��712:42 1!ViO .�. �,iv t7 :, ;os)6i �, :�o+develo a crm[• � . ,. . ertecparks �s are�ane m � rs�••9♦ ► Y�R.�� �< rYom ..::-.'....;,.,:.:3/4:,....,,:.. � .z.fy4yis,iLw4v`io�w1 .:r*L- ay.ti::,- �:. 3•+�..�%�..w:z �,.., ,.� �� :� s _ � ��< .��� 'olicy 6.lA Plan for the connection of open space,natural areas,parks,trails,bike paths,and recreation areas to minimize conflicts G with the environment. olicy 6.1B Encourage private dedications of land as permanent natural areas or open space. P olicy 6.1D All developments should link their recreation facilities and natural areas to the community open space network where C.--.appropriate. ol,cy 6.1E Trails shall ultimately connect to public preserves and the regional trail network per the Eastern Pima County Trails System Master Plan,where possible. Dnii,- 6.11 Protect existing and establish new trail access points to major washes and regional preserves. C.- ).lJ Develop a bike paths system that is separate from the roadways and serves to interconnect various public facilities iN) such as schools,parks,trails,open space areas,etc. Pr �f }}I ,: ..,... .. ...::�..y....-.. ; .f,�: .c:y.•.a�•>s r �„•TXysR, �,i' .>r Oi y�f_ ?h.�'.fz+''��Sc"�•J1•� ��i'ac^t�,�`,,,ry'3 t„ �.. - ..r,�. n..5 y. �,,r..r-y. ate/ r 'a:r�io>• z`f4�F. T4'Y%'P.. bu^�r.,t.•(�t�t.-.. +T� r}J�'^.��GYy�./��1,��3: �.�.y�S��,�. 'Fr ?P:'�,���, :!'•r 7e' ...4 :•�04,t.r'LT•_ ..T� �,. �T ry 2>'A 1Z� ,gyp .�tA. �./N: .:/',. '•+"'.:.. 'Y`�:.G.+G.r. eHvr✓,5.�71` :'l'. - :%/:.f uY. •; si::�ef,s�;..,_ ..,if�yt.a"• .[^'"":fn�'.M" �. ,Y, *?rY. '.:.1!±Sl�?'-c"'�'t.:��''.Sf:�'.,.4 �' �.�,. h -:e;•• tL�,,, ,s�• ?,�•.I t: + ;,wS ..fby r.r, fi ar,.. ..� '•mar J .�S + .f'�.+ '.,O•�d%��� '���a .c� "''�'i�:' ,`�;•v. .•a t't: w f .-.r:J d:: it►4f!.aW.• ,4 Ste.:.�?.,'i r n a n n rn a e ,, ' "�`.+� t w.., :sensit�ry o ens � <: ,��. ���;;�- A.,�;. ..,.. .<:' _ � �- �� �, (� i :,- s:To protect,t eyenv,� ..: " y, , :Nom,,.� 1 -t.. two ... ,,-.,.. ` * V oal���+r gra �i 'l> > •t.t .r_.� y..• ��x�r. ,�.f �'.'a. ��• "�? :cr�c��r„,�,�� �v,.:...� 4%?:•'�....,,..s,:, ...%"A>1`� •f, •t:w"3�' :F^•3�', Policy 6.213 Open space preservation shall be used as a criterion in deciding theapproval or denial of land use rezoning proposals. C., Policy 6.2g C Encourage natural open space connection to and the expansion of Tortolita Mountain Park. open space areas thatprotect the visual,natural,and cultural resources of the community. Policy 6.2G Preserve and enhancep p SAFETY ELEMENT , ..,...•...t :-,......>. .. .'.•a +LJ��'j' ?�'4���'Si•.•��•r�, y;c�"r •,�wW�,a,���,c.w..; yA,��' :u. t o o.:'•.`1-;:✓- '<' l:. !a• .e '-,�.'.e�` t''�7'-•..+���D:-vv;'ia":'�; :r-: ,e.�T�.�.?�i.'`�W.;'�ih•i+,,. wet+. .•��11.. .• S:,•'��.�.`'�^ . .r. «-"';j �•” ;* ra i l .ti �l ,C fAi '►+iwi,,'. :C:..'h 1. .: r+3 _.•t.,.',Y•f.br.K< ,a' wr. _::cfq 't: vf. '�n`.�'a' .',�+'�t.•� t;. �' �7�'+�'�` ., >�' o„ .•� .H.. �t y s. •...•c•.:ti�` » ur .r „e . �.�::•.:b': ':!•.s•. f.��`vt' +• ,.,•� ^s.;� .vt.a.��`5.¢.�..:� 2` �'i s.. :Y.v' -�'k` .y �.. _y ,.;v,.„s`•fi.�r.��` „{. :ll.,a"� •'ti a�..i�'�_�.,(trr � •T•;�,,, fes,. .a�wr, >:s�. M, :►j x..' a +If •a. f �•ib .�.. -i: ,.�.', .�•w':.:�, •y::o�. t`"r..t ..c;. .���.�'>!t.,•.>...1r•,y :v.•. ,y.. �_1�..� �. � i.r 4...w. � .;.t��..��n_S �. .1::. �. ..•e -:r% "S'- h'�. _ �4i��f..:�..y. �i.:�, r- �,^. �) �'.:k. .� t .R. '`�r��.cc,�,,��� ,at;:' ��. .,C;3`. �- t:7E�• ..�,T! �'ti.,� .,•7.'' ..�{'a,. -a 1%`tE^..:wF Y .'1►1 r.�^...a-, '<:�f:. .y�.• Baa..Y, ''� moi. •t; 't :i.t:�y'a,'- 1 � � /r� •L•:Y 4<� :t:.:t •'t.:/!/. :A.>. y. `f:3; .r sx;ia. ......i?a w `!•+9• e ��I �e�■ `• .,+V •:+f�.... I.`...> tom.•. .?t Y7:1•�....).i�. �1 y .f,/� '� '..R.....1k�����N,. i',,.... / .11.65'.',:; rO:�/)� .r .. .J r.t;,..`,w - .i,: ,,ez w!Y! T• M k....n•.�..:Z > .'{.Y..i. i ._ G o a� /• ♦i i°r�A i-w •w Y' ��' F',� 7< �iti r3�F'" s^�q'^�';4�..F`''Yw�..Lc.�T!JLr�•� ;��•�'� f..t ».Y.�'•C �;;.:�s.'!!v�.,i,: t,. �r��^b: R i r� _w v ./r✓f.'�:�:..r.t:;•ti?:.!!�1a1'3.. ........................ ...... .. ... :�•••�.. ..,..... .. .. .fw' u is safetyshall be developed as a required finding for development review. H 1 Policy 4.1A School site planning in regards top public P Dnformance:C=conforms;D=Doesn't Conform;NA=not applicable;U=unknown,too close to tell,etc. ake any notes regarding conformance on the back of the sheet. 1Admin PZ\ RMS\Develo merit Review\General Plan Conformance Table.doc Page 3 FO p j • GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE CHECKSHEET N A TURA L RESOURCE CE CONSERVATION ELEMENT-CONTINUED Conformance � �',,���,; ;,�:;��.-..�:, r/.-:•s. i� { ,�b,�.'•(:7i�wM` ''� �"i0..�''F"y.. t..Cf�k'�`r i,'�.•�'f�L/ A� i4�`. .i.'+7'k'= i ,.:. .• -/ ° S 't . a `7.^ ,ff .�4;,-}+•'"... LA'd'a�,�•'v-`a.. y:(► )y� T .aA!! 4" '.�.:..<� .t. v:c'?.t3 ''L.i/•1,:�.'�•''2�'✓?3'^>•�.'.i.^fv'<.�•,��^T,.�.Q���` r+rr'�. .� s. `t.. (�-Q e.. �:i-.O.11J;7�1��;1•.> �d�wi O.✓y. �.�w .;,i i .u��`i,,^f;•.:i::'�M�<,5f1- S :y�.�,.yY,��/l(.:.tf+-y,:� .'t... '� <, �ppT �es�� �n��ec��J�.�i� <:'•`�to.T�^♦_ :�`,.<� ,� � :c.,Is y`Z G :h .:.nc'�•- r, 'T ...I �a i. .,i. A�e,beeT�::tj . y•1!.edli p,w'.v�.� • +l' Y, ''Y!•' � -_ \t ' vsj:n:4�?:.Y : �'�ehi.�ia V.+V... .g :9 a1i•. r�<. �l�M�!(.�).'W'r>'�•�•�• �� .f'..�i. .-. •'�'�.. �> fo •�. �.. '�� �.�: � .,r.. �.4.•i":..`Y'�':i+�`,.:tsc(�;'".''��'C 's�^ �94'1"24f"�' .y. ,,.-4+al�v...M,.r.•ri...�^ �< 'J� �7latura�:.�f#�-� � wt�yYv'. Y `�CL'of...:: �„n'' ��Hli...4i.>..r�r a< ;u. vn�:y+.,f.. e:�'I�nn�n' rea-s; ,.. - `.z�:. z':0.-A.tA,a, <"TQ prot�ft�h .r...-"k:'�%+�+• ,s`>G�i.:e'i.. ab7%;•�C is�'`.•,�, , �•:� .,•vc..�;�.g:..•p '‘'.:!.,..,.,;.,.-„,-...1-„...:‘,..:„.;,;,,-„:. i.8-1=422::. s. � st.. t':'a ys. � :r' +._,.:ice��,n3"i-�'^i.,,�,:,�'l;.��sA.• ?*•.s;Lw.�3:. ilicy 8.1C Wash encroachment may be perm�tte p ' d where flood tains are broad and shallow in order to permit a reasonable roe ,unless such encroachment impedes natural groundwater recharge ofthe a q uifer. utilization of p p �' as"balanced basins"and any future basins designated as such,Pima County N ,lacy 8.1E For drainage basins designated shall be adhered to. Pr Floodplain Management policies and regulations clic 8.l F Allow only floodplain-compatible uses in flood-prone areas. C y � vegetation and riparian habitats should be maintained and enhanced where possible. alicy 8.1G Indigenous(native desert) P 8.1}� Identify and protect light-sensitive uses and locations,i.e.Kitt Peak,Mt.Lemon,Mt.Bigelow,and the Pusch Ridge olicy Wilderness area. N Pr COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT }-;�;_.- ,,.�• ,r=��,. .--�.� �.r a•^ cit'.'"::,•� ��w,wS�v?��'!�'y3. .,.-i-S��+,sx.N-��I V �'���� �v� i`''<sr •4a •• ;ny,.`�a•.:H,.;r..-,s'•• ��.,y!r..i[.'<P.:.,'-a fT'''��'�-.p„"I���y�FK+�NFY,1M'9L�'yD.YC�"L+•M�yy+snyV��r'�,.�..�M'„� i .t.�� �:� 'i'?.'�����:'-■'� (� ���; ./�. '.J��.:'1'r'¢k-if.:�'!'�T;.':�,W�' sy. • /5.�''C+T+_ �,,:i O�! ..�Y1.�7•:•.C!'.,c: a.�. ../.,•,y`K+� .Y��;1��:���� .,,.Y r_ �°-i§k::,..�4,a<,.�.:s. f ->;xo ��_ ..nage _. :� �� :r.•. :x�:.��• � ,� «� �: .�.�:�F ��:�.,. m a f�bae;�xl�= ls�� `� ,� .s :' .•.�: �� ,sand ,� d. ,c ,,�. ,<, ;w !►:.!'�s�''..,�..�ti`•/. .+(..c :','�. •L�.-+`,LyS� :� e.as�n •-�O 4.: .�r-.�...,;ro� z „�.'SC �';q„"'.`••i;. r `"�'`..^7C:•Y_...r. ;. r.,f.�:.., �eSt�1 e��C8� .�... v .r;.c.' .r:''`I^s� :.r,:�l'=�-:�,..v"r' �k....r.���fjiY''"��«e��.Y��y ;y en rsa p..._.. r�:a env'i.ronm. ..�. •W9 <W r .,*..��.,�� :r���r;}��t ; ,�x�; .:�.:�.n...,.T� -/�f.y To ensure that th£bu�lf ,�..zr--....-,:r�.��,,��<�., �Yt.��F�a,,�r�� t:sv'� ,..��.,..�Y..�....�;.�. - 4 y ,. , �=� � _���;�. .. J,d l...T:.'!. T � olicy 9.1D All development proposals s is of lots to hould attemP t to arrange buildings,massing of buildings,and/or arrangemen preserve views from adjacent properties and streets while providing privacy for residents. 'olicy 9.1E All development proposals should show design strategies used to minimize changes to existing topography and the disturbance of existing vegetation. C., surroundings'olicy 9.1F All sides of buildings may impact their surr sand should be coherently designed and treated. Mk g 'olicy 9.1G In order to maximize integration of the built environment with the natural environment,and minimize distractions of w development proposals should incorporate means of reducing the apparent size and Nk the built environment,all ne p bulk of buildings. 'olicy 9.11 All new development proposals should consider existing landscaping within 400 feet of the project site to provide and maintain landscape continuity within the community. N Pc CULTURAL AND HISTORIC RESOURCES ELEMENT '..•.� -�shy<tT4?`"`.'� w%rz 6o Ys". r..y 3 ?..'Y�a c<+ wi. >�fi��w1r:X:t' >`�s�+.a 1, a!�.t mow!' °d:i�4r`. t� r^,t;_'i,:<�fw-\,fes,�'►�.�r r^.,!�w'�•,h[�1,.��"K. ..:�,4 d.Y,Fw: 7 c�r.�. �.�r ,rvs ��.�i.air..�a r.yy+/.�r�` T�": .J;7�'R.`J.YC^,[�'.' ..`iF� ,�"°6�� t�'"::».7A :,nr.;.a.<y 1.:A:'=.:'c• .KN .Z-',:��`.o.., n ii ye..::f.T..i>_ ).. '.irti.l., ..�'►:l s:.,� r� -' ."1�`. .ilia• �•� 4 F`!-f+'4.� '3, '�>�: �>.tNy.� .�•. ��i, ta'-rss7.i'".� ;}�.','.�•i'-�"" •`.. `.'�1^toe !: .Fb.. //.:��' �+�x4 <s w'r�.d^ ".)-::q �'4,:Y�fx'v,•i./. /.- Y' .i. :.,N.Y.Y'?'•..., ..,F%~ __.��_. .',. � - ''rea. � -.Y! .'�►� .:•A.' b'}q .1!^4-+�1h .0 4J, t .rj;...y.7'.. C. r ,.��:.sjyn�, ,. ■„„ �y <.lanrr�n. ..;�:��. -� 'L �= r. . i<^a>r,s s c..'' +�i".'S f.,--.i b ufth�, ,.� ....: z..,.., ..,._. _� �.�.�,s:.�,L.,.sc �:. ■■�`j. ■y�� ur�ces t ,�. >~�. �. ,�. ��.Y.(��(�� .... .��„��`.� .... :s:•..:y r+ r,,.:?:f•.-A• >�' .Y. ra;�.antl�� fV1, ■.■�.�� .� u:f• Y Y��� '�1!✓ K- "���+r'LL .. � f -,: ,1■(,■' rpreservethe<'unique cy9Jt i --�:�!�rvk. t , 4e?4 --; I - . ,. o a�..i�V��Z/iw!r?v'C�.�.'-. ".'...�.P.�� .•a'hk�3'.•"¢`,T'�1.F� V.r..��./.a�'. ':-�.:,±I..L�.,_-<-` l�r.�^.C7�F.7'�:��•.�r� for all new developments where evidence of culturallarchaeological resources is 'olicy 10.2A Require cultural resourcesurveys C., found. 10.2B Ensure protection of cultural resources discovered during construction. 14 CV 1 onformance.C=conforms;D=Doesn't Conform;NA=not applicable;U=unknown,too close to tell,etc. take any notes regarding conformance on the back of the sheet. Page 4 -1 A Amin P7\F(1R MS\Develooment Review\General Plan Conformance Table.doc cu d 41 rTl i+ g ,I . ............ „., Z 'mu." .413 E, i r CU � tl) to 0 c Q m 2 1.• re 0 o .4i.< 8 1-- Z.-- , to > i C Q Z 4•0 C Clei.37,., DO - 11e10 N r-- co E N ii-- < N FIR: v,. ea a. MIME 0 oy X litj'ill; OX19 �\�pN�sIli 0 CII oj 0 1 lisi Om . I , 0 'gm" cc 0 V" w 0 I 0 Z1 N 1 4 CO � fiLl!d aU . . //// / / // / / ,..... \ / (!) r.„, / / / 4, ---uur- \ • — I i i U) / r v.- CD / ' / / / 40 cn / /..-s, n / 4*'iet & iv L. co (n .. '11:3 1, va// 4,..".4‘ 1.74*4 't3 ,.."''' c 6*I II.I /i i 4 I I* o � � = Ed � c J � i °� //�� 12.-0 i aa � gc i � QarmOavoO /IV *43) i . ir / / � ao •�m � � am 0 O tel- 2 rnJ m U) ��S 7\ \ Nit ., 4_\,,11* \ \ . AO \ . �ZaJd 2 CLL' d 0 0 \\ 'Ct. � � ci4741,111,s4 rk: \ .v it. \ hd tlist.- V\ 11%.,.r'N4OSP l"' o $4, *104 14.0 1.1 . CI,. I .4.400, X °8 , Uml = / N �o0 1 ". ailsX /1 Ati, TN'r 1Z Z N 1C TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: Aug. 1st, 2001 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: CHUCK SWEET, TOWN MANAGER DATE: July 31st, 2001 SUB J: Reconsideration of Ordinance No. (0) 01-21 OV11-01-02 General Plan Amendment for Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood #12 SUMMARY: 18th, 2001 the Town Council approved Ordinance No. (0) 01-21, On July therebyamendingthe Town's General Plan for Neighborhood #12 OV -11-01-02 in the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development. Since the adoption of this Ordinance the Town has received a letter from the applicant (Vistoso Partners LLC) requesting a reconsideration of the action taken on July 18th 2001 (See q g attached copy). Addy, itionall the Town Attorney has expressed some legal concerns relating to the "considerations" included in this General Plan Amendment. A separate Attorney-Client Privilege Privile e memorandum is being distributed to you from the Town Attorney which will outline his concerns. Robert's Rules of Order and Section IX. — MOTIONS TO RECONSIDER of the Town Council Policies and Procedures outline the process whereby previous actions of the Town Council can be reconsidered. As indicated in the attached excerpt of this section of the Policies and Procedures, "Reconsideration of any action taken (or not by the Town Council may be requested only by a taken) Council member who was on the prevailing side of the vote." The vote on July 18th 2001 was approved by a 4-0 vote, with Council Member Rochman voting on the prevailingside. Council Member Rochman has indicated his request to reconsider this previous action of the Town Council on this evening's agenda. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Section n IX. — MOTIONS TO RECONSIDER, 1. Placement on the Agenda, excerpt from Town Council Policies and Procedures. 2y , Jul 31St 2001 Letter from Vistoso Partners, L.L.C. requesting reconsideration of General Plan Amendments for RV #11 & #12 RECOMMENDATIONS: g Due to the legal concerns that are being brought forward by the Town Attorney's • office and theg it magnitude of the General Plan Amendment contained in OV11-01- 02, is recommended that the Town Council approve a motion to reconsider your action of July 18th 2001 regarding Ordinance No. (0) 01-21, OV11-01-02. It is further recommended that if this reconsideration motion is approved, that the appropriate action on the item itself would be to continue OV11-01-02 to the appro p September 19th2001 regular meeting. This would allow sufficient time for the p Town Council to conduct a StudySession/Executive Session on this requested General Plan Amendment during August or early September 2001. SUGGESTED MOTION: I make a motion to reconsider Ordinance No. (0) 01-21, previously adopted by the Town Council on July18th 2001 due to legal concerns expressed this evening. TOWN MANAGER b. jpvpluptary: At any time before the question is called on a pending motion, a Council member may make a motion to amend the motion. At that time the discussion of the underlying issue will stop. If there is not a second to the motion to amend, then discussion on the underlying issue will continue. If the motion to amend is adopted by a majority of the Council, discussion will continue on the (now) amended motion. If the motion to amend fails, discussion will continue on the original motion on the floor. c. Vigunian, WlthdraajI: At any time before the question is called on a pending motion, the Council member who made the motion may ask that his/her motion be withdrawn. The motion will be withdrawn only in the event that the Council member who seconded the motion agrees with withdrawal of the motion. 8. Calling the Ouestio:: Discussion shall end at the time the question is called, or at the time the Mayor determines that there is no further need for discussion. 9. lakinglivailig: The Mayor shall ask Council members to designate his/her vote by =mum* "aye" or "nay". If, prior to the vote or after the vote, any Council member requests a roll call vote, the Clerk shall call roll, and each Council member shall state his/her vote aloud. Any abstention shall count as a "nay" vote. 10. Ammuncinfabrainuillitkaitg: After the vote, the Mayor shall announce whether the motion failed or passed. If the vote was unanimous, the Mayor shall so state, and if it was not, the Mayor shall state the individual vote for the record, stating the number of "aye" and "nay" votes. 11. lie Votes: In the case of a tie in votes on any motion, the motion shall be considered lost. The item itself may be continued to another meeting. 12, : Ordinances shall be prepared as provided by law. SECTION IX. - MOTIONS TO RECONSIDER 1. Placement on the Agd : Reconsideration of any action taken (or not taken) by the Town Council may be requested oh by a Council member who was on the prevailing side of the vote. 2. Discussion and Vote on thy_riginal Jssu : If the motion to reconsider failed, the Council will skip the next agenda item, which will be the discussion and vote of the original issue. If the motion to reconsider was successful, the Council will discuss and vote on the original issue as for any other business before the Council, and any Council member may make motions on the original issue. r ltrpslvoouncirpdiciss.6-01051111-4:00 pm 8 U l%J1I U1 14:u1 rAA 40U Opo 01.:1 VISTOSO PARTNERS,LLC 1121 W. Warner Road,Suite 109 Tempe,Arizona 85284 480431-2000 480-893-1604 fax July 31,2001 Mr. Chuck Sweet Town Manager Town of Oro Valley 11000 N.LaCanada Drive Oro Valley,Arizona 85737 Dear Chuck: Vistoso Partners feels that the considerations placed on the approval of the General Plan Amendments Neighborhood 11 and 12 would be more appropriately addressed at the for PAD Amendment level. Therefore, request that the Mayor and Council reconsider their approval we respectfully of these two General Plan Amendments and continue them until the corresponding PAD Amendments are forwarded to the Mayor and Council or until other circumstances dictate_ Sincerely, . 41, - 410 i John Beerling Mike • TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 9 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE• o jf� O. HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL � : FROM: Bryant Nodine, AICP, Planning and Zoning Administrator Sangeeta Jain, Planner II SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING. ORDINANCE N p, (0)01-21 , OV11-01-02, REQUEST TO AMEND . THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY GENERAL PLAN FOR THE AREA KNOWN AS RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 12 LOCATED NORTH OF RV BOULEVARD IN THE NOTCH FORMED BY THE TOWN BOUNDARIES BETWEEN RV NEIGHBORHOODS 11 & 13 (ASSESSOR'S PARCEL # 21904009E, 21920002A, 21920002B, AND A PORTION OF 21904009D) BACKGROUND • • • Commission in April 2001, to amend the General Plan for This item was initiated by the Planning and Zoning p the area known as a portion of Rancho Vistoso Nel gh borhood 12. The request to change the General Plan land use designation was made by the WLB Group on behalf of Vistoso Partners. SITE DESCRIPTION parcel is approximately- subject 360 acres located north of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard in the notch formed _ie Town boundaries between Neighborhoods 11 and 13 (see the attached map). The current General Plan • portion of the property as Low Density Residential and the designates the southern half and an eastern P p . g with a back updesignation of Rural Low Density Residential. northwestern portion as Parks Open Space g LANDOWNER'S REQUEST •Vistoso Partners L.L.C., is requesting General Plan amendment from the current The WLB Group, on behalf of V�st � existing of different land use designations. Table 1 below summarizes the exis g land use designations to create a mix potentially be acres; table two comparesp y and proposed land uses Inthe number of dwelling units that could the current General Plan and the applicant's proposal. developed under current County zoning, TABLE 1: NH 12 ACREAGE SUMMARY P/OS w/back up of LDR (0.4-0.5 Total Area RLDR (0-0.3 DU/AC) DU/AC) Current General Plan Designations 177 182 359 Proposed General Plan Designations • Parks and Open Space 92 59 151 • LDR (0.4-- 0 .5 D U/AC) 85 87 172 • MDR (5.1 - 10.0 D U/AC) 23 23 Resort 13 13 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 5 TABLE 2: NH 12 DWELLING UNITS COMPARISON P/OS w/back upof LDR .4-.5 DU/AC Total DU RLDR 0-.3 DU/AC Potential DU per County Zoning (RH) 39 48 87 Potential DU under Current General Plan 0.48 79-99 79-147 57 40 (LDR) 153 Proposed DU + 44 (MDR) Note: The areas above are based on GIS data. DU/AC -Dwelling Units per Acre P/OS—Parks/Open Space RLDR - Rural Low Density Residential LDR-Low Density Residential GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE Staff has evaluated this proposal against the Focus 2020 General Plan (GP) and finds the following. Focus 2020 Land Use Map.. Town of Oro Valley General Plan has designated northern half of this amendment of Rural Low Density Residential at 0-0.3 DU/AC). -re9 as Parks and Open Space (with back up designation outhern half of this area plus a portion to the east has been designated as low density residential (.4-.5 DU/AC). The proposed LDR in the southern area meets the current General Plan Map. The resort and MDR in the southern area and the LDR in the northern area require a map amendment. will significantly impact the open space in this Impact on Open Space: The General Plan amendment proposal g . p The proposal does not provide any large pockets of contiguous open area (as shown in the attached map). p P aces, except one near the current boundary line s between parks and open space and low-density residential P zoning district. • is proposing an increase of housing units in the Impact on Number of Dwelling Units: The applicant p p g . p more than current zoningwould allow). The number of housing units POS/RLDR land use designation (18 proposed in LDR is within the current General Plan range. Urban Growth Boundary: As per Focus 2020, Town's Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) follows the outer edges project area (as shown in the attached map). The General Plan of residential land use designations in the p � • existing ".......is a line that indicates any land north of the line should not receive any increase in states that the UGB currently exists. The purpose of the UGB was to ensure rural character density or land use intensity over what cu y p p it is strongly recommended that the Town Council and other preservation of the land within the area. Therefore, g y jurisdictions consider and honor the existing resident's wishes to maintain the rural character of the area. increasing the intensity of developmentof Additionally, this area over the next twenty years will continue the trend toward urban sprawl that the ... ......Plan is attempting to limit. " limits of urban infrastructure ori urban growth boundary should designate the existing g or planned and services, such as sewer and water. Currently, the UGB follows the limits of the low-density residential development. F:\OV\OV11\2001\11-01-02\RV12 GP July 18 TC.doc TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 3 of 5 • half of the area, the limits of the UGB will have to it7 new ro osal of Increased density in the northern the proposal • to follow the proposed boundaries of the development. be extended p P isamount of infrastructure that will be required to re alreadybeing extended into the area and the . Infrastructure than would be required by existing zoning. To serve serve the proposed development to the north is no more . p P ' water service reservoir in the area and a road to the reservoir. the, Ritz, the Town is currently developing a through the sized to serve the proposed development and is being extendedg Other infrastructure to the south is southernp ortion of the area to serve the Ritz. AMENDMENTS TO AND UPDATE OF THE GENERAL PLAN: "the stated in Focus 2020, granting of a general plan amendment will be based on the following Uourj findings of fact". ' an overall improvement to the general plan and is Findingof Fact #]: That the amendment constitutes P . a particular landowner or owners at a particular point in time. not solely for the benefit of . presented is in Applicant States: that the development as response to the natural terrain of the area and pp the preservation of open space. • consistent in terms of housing units with the general "staff Analysis: As noted previously, the proposal is y ' In those areas the proposal is an improvement to the _ �an for those areas currently designated LDR. • approved resort (see Finding of Fact #3 below), provides open space, PIan because it recognizes the clustering, support for the resort and a housing product (casitas) related to the resort. increases housingunits and affects open space. The In the northern area, the proposed amendment units in the POS district is higher than the maximum housing proposed plan for 57 residential housing • (as shown in the revious Table). The amendment in the northernunits possible under the General Plan P applicant, but does provide the following benefits to the Town: area primarily benefits the • a relativelyhigh tax base compared to the services that are • residential development that provides g required; one-time fiscal impact from construction sales tax and fees; • development that provides a large, p • enhancement of the Town's destination resort image and character; and, • development that will helpto attract high-end, specialty retail investment. The applicant canmitigateimpact the im act on open space among other things by: • redesigning si nin theproposal to decrease number of housing units larger areas of open aces, which are wildlife friendly. • redesigning the proposal to provide g p p • providing open space areas in otherparts arts of the Town that would benefit the community. .he considerations recommended by Staff in Exhibit 'A' addresses the latter two issues and results in an overall benefit to the Town. F:\OV\OV11\2001\11-01-02\RV12 GP July 18 TC.doc TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COI TNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 4 of 5 ,nding of Fact #2: That the amendment is consistent with the vision, goals, and policies of the general plan. • to all the applicable goals and policies of the General Applicant States: This amendment conforms pp PP involvea resort area. This development will be focused around Plan that the promotion of the Town as the Stone Canyon golf course and the Ritz Resort. Staff Analysis: Staff has evaluated this proposalagainstgoals the and policies of the General Plan and pp policies (see the attached General Plan of the 26 applicable finds that the proposal conforms with 23 Conformance Checksheet). Finding of Fact #3: That the general plan land usedoes not provide appropriate optional sites for map the use proposed in the amendment. • land use mapdoes not provide any other optional sites for the Applicant States: that the general plan use proposed in the amendment. Staff Analysis: In evaluating this finding of fact, staff would like to point out that the development of NH 11 alongthe western side of this project area started with an the Ritz resort in Rancho Vistoso proposal The. 1998ro osal for 13 acres ofresort designation and 23 approval of General Plan amendment in p specific to the roved resort and could not be provided gyres of medium density residential is p approved elsewhere. The low density residential is an extension of the Stone Canyon Development tied to the Golf Club, and to a lesser extent to the resort. The General Plan does not provide appropriate optional g this kind of hi h-end, low-density residential near a golf course and resort area. sites for development of amendment will not adversely impact the community as a whole, or a Finding of Fact #4: That the the acceptable means of mitigating these impacts through portion of the community without an p subsequent zoning and development process. • will have apositive impact on the community as a whole, as it Applicant States: that the amendment p . willsensitive limiting development in riparian habitat areas. The development will preserve sensstive areas by lsmstsng p p drainage oversized wildlife friendlydraina e structures and "watering holes" for wildlife. Staff Analysis: Amending the General Plan to allow the additional units in the northern area may have vironment. Addin development standards to the proposal, such as those some adverse impacts on the en g P in Exhibit 'A', can mitigate these impacts. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENTS: • notification regarding the proposed amendment was given to adjacent As required by State statue, public g g p p property owners within 600 feet, posted on the site, published in the local paper and posted at Town Hall. Staff e'-q notified members of Sector Boards 4 and 5. No comments were received except those from Sector Board .nbers as reported in the section entitled Sector Board Meeting below. F:\OV\OV11\2001\11-01-02\RV12 GP July 18 TC.doc , TOWN OF ORO VALLEY cQITNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 5 of 5 NNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ACTION: ' Commission held apublic hearing on this proposal and On June 5, 2001, the Planning and Zoning . designations, thereby amending the General Plan. The recommended approval (4-1) of changing the land use g , • • „ . changing Exhibit 'A' from "conditions of approval Planning and Zoning Commission motion recommended g g Pl g e uirements that must be fulfilled) to "considerations" (suggestions for future development review and (i.e.,.r q approval). This change is reflected in Exhibit 'A'. SECTOR BOARD MEETING were members of Sector Board 4 and 5. By consensus the boards On May10th, Staff held a meeting with the it opposed to the proposed change. They statedthat, if the Town chose to go forward with the amendment, pp should do so only if the amount of open space dedicated to the Town is 3 to 5 times what is used for the proposed development. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: , uncil a rove this item with the considerations listed in Exhibit 'A'. Staff recommends that the Town Co pp TOWN MANAGER RECOMMENDATION: Amendment contained in OV 11-01-02 and taking into consideration Due to the magnitude of the General Plan it is Council Members will bepresent at the July 18, 2001 regular meeting, that only four of the five meeting. continued to either the August 15 or September 5, 2001 regular g recommended that this agenda item be eneral will allow sufficient time for the full Town Council to hold a Study Session on the specifics of this G rlan Amendment. SUGGESTED MOTION: The Council maywish to consider one of the following motions: • Amendments to the 1996 General Plan, to the regular Town I move to continue Ordinance N o. (0)01-21 allow sufficient time for the Town Council to hold a study Council meeting of , thereby a session on this matter. -or- I move not to adopt the Amendments to the 1996 General Plan and to deny Ordinance No. (0)01- 21 _, finding that: • ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ordinance No. (0)01-21 A..);2. Exhibit 'A': Considerations for OV 11-01-02 / 3. Exhibit `B':NH 12 Proposed General Plan Amendment Area illk 4. Exhibit 'C': NH 12 Existing & Proposed Land Uses P 1 ann�iA WIZ:�d Zonin dministrator 5. General Plan Conformance Checksheet f i / 4,1...... j . - nity Develo ent Director f � ...iF:\OV\OV F:\OV\OV11\2001\11-01-02\RV12 GP July 18 TC.doc Town Manager ORDINANCE NO. (0)01- 91 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE LAND USE MAP OF THAT DOCUMENT KNOWN AS "FOCUS 2020: TOWN OF ORO VALLEY GENERAL PLAN, JULY 1996" FOR A PORTION OF RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 12; FIXING THE EFFECTIVE DATE THEREOF; AND REPEALING ANY OTHER ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH. WHEREAS, the Town of Oro Valley adopted a document known as the "Focus 2020: Town of Oro Valley General Plan, July 1996"; and WHEREAS, it has become necessary to revise, amend and update this document due to a request for an alternate land use for that parcel known as a portion of Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 12; WHEREAS, Planning the and Zoning Commission, having considered an amendment to the Land Use Map of the Town of Oro Valley General Plan relative to the appropriate land use for that property known as a portion of Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 12; and designation p p y having a heldpublic hearingon said map amendment; and having made its recommendations to the Town Council; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY: SECTION 1. The Council hereby adopts a revised Land Use Map as a part of that certain document known as "Focus 2020: Town of Oro Valley General Plan, July 1996". Said map revision shall reflect a land use designation on that parcel known as a portion of Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 12, as described in Exhibits `B', 'C' and 'D'. Three copies of the revised Land Use Map of said document are on file in the office of the Town Clerk of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona. SECTION 2. The effective date of the revised Land Use Map shall be on the date of approval of a PAD amendment based on the considerations listed in Exhibit 'A'. SECTION 3. If anysection, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of the ordinance or any pof the Land Use Map amendment adopted herein is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. SECTION 4. That all ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be repealed to the extent of such conflict. ORDINANCE NO. (0)01- 21 (Continued) PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this 18th day of July, 2001. Paul H. Loomis, Mayor ATTEST: at-4144L Kat n Cuvelier, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: �'�t _ 2 ,540� Dan Dudley, Town Attorney PUBLISH: Daily Terri.'orial July 31, August 1, 2, 3, 2001 POSTED: July 27 - August 26, 2001 rg (0)01-21 p.3 EXHIBIT 'A' OV11-01-02 AMENDMENT MENT TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY GENERAL PLAN FOR RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 12 CONSIDERATIONS FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT At the time of PAD Amendment 1. Vistoso Partners will dedicate the Honey Bee Canyon Park Site to the Town. 2. Vistoso Partners will provideany reservoir sites, not already in place,to serve these developments 3. Vistoso Partners will dedicate an acceptable area in trade for any additional open space impacted as a p result of the proposed PAD beyond be and what would be impacted through the development of existing entitlements. Areas such as, but not limited to, the Honey Bee Village Archaeological Site or designated riparian areas within BigWash and the Honey Bee Wash that could be impacted by development, may be considered as acceptable. p 4. Riparian areas within the development will be preserved with at least 300 feet wide areas of open space left as wildlife corridor unless existingconditions (topography, vegetation, etc.) or mitigation measures adequately buffer development impacts (lights, noise, etc.). 5. All street crossingof riparian areas shall be designed to be wildlife friendly by providing: p a. shrubs up to the shoulders speed limits of 15-20 mph g c. culverts or other structures where the length is no more than two times the width (for wider roads [longer crossings] this may mean providing a light well at the median) d. sandy-bottomed, square culverts or at least large, sandy bottomed, 1/2 or 1/4 round culverts option, a 2'-3' culvert-type crossingfor smaller animals such as javelina in conjunction with an e. as an yp g area on either side of the drainage level with the roadway and enhanced with vegetation to provide an area where larger animals can cross. f. as an option, pavement materials that mimic native materials 6. Rock outcropscomparable arable to those identified in the Harris Study (greater than 1,000 square feet in area p and higher than 10 feet) shall have 50 feet buffers around 75% of their circumference. 7. No development shall be visible from the floodplain of the Honey Bee Wash. 8. Grading limits of no more than 20,000 square feet shall be imposed on all lots. Other 9. The approval of this General Plan amendment does not constitute an approval of the number of lots or the layout of lots as submitted, which will be evaluated at the PAD amendment request. (0)01-21 p.4 _ Q W C t CC E J , z _._ _........._ v.) 't7 / cN 00.O QE (I) E 4 0 a. c 4 re 0 IV i41a O ,r H' It •ens = > 4:11) \\ r: =• lr 113 C 1 -... 4 I) al E 1 N , is earn on. _ 0 0._ X w 11111 00 - • 0 ti \` �` „� , .\,\\, ,,\\\ GAO CL \s„,.\\\\\\ \\s„.\::c\\\ \\- -.- \ N\ \\\N\ N-\\ ,, ,s, . ,„, 0 s.• a. a oe 0 w z 1 CNI � �� Q Tim I N LA CHOLLA BL I, N (0)01-21 p.5 E hibit C NH 12 proposed Land Uses ■. l I 'iii IilllII !,:!..„„,, III . III I_ _1 .. ., II r IIIIII II��+,� - 11,11,:„.".........,:..)._„....„,,z,„-_- ' I_ � �', ciii,:.._, � ,. _— ,IIII .1 ►�1 �� t =_X111 _ !1III ,1-�. _'{,,,,: illii. - M11 / !lit .-'-,----,:--------.VIII!I7i,,,_ lIlk11!--01 Ili _ 1►�1.,,, X11 I. 1 iiiiii l'i',:,;..1.;,_::_,,, ._ _ 1111 - ,i1 1111111 llIII- ;_ I _ ,iii --..--_:::711-i.-,_,!:IIIIII,1.. 1 Ili li: =1--llS ,► . ;Ill, h . ::,.to�IIhI1 =111 _ i1iik ! IIS Illi --.i `y ! �7_: ,IItil, , l ... -� II `1 tv ,III, X1111,,,, 1111 _t�iiii-,,, l1111' i! I VIII_ i l I _ _1 7_ II:- _� �l �,.,111, .........A. ' --.- lir.? _ 1 !....:, 11 ,1 i ill: I,I;�, ; -- ,..-.=:,.._. 1,_,.,,,: - -'--illit till _.:-._)?:t..1,:-.:6::::_11-:-=:11,1-11—:-=-----i'S!; '..,:kji\41 1 Ili == r--7_ .' ���Y 1�I' b-h_11-__ .111*!_ji II!_;..Thlksc.';'—'13,-.::.:—,111111i1' : -—_ - I 11111 -=--� 11111:_is----,i,--_ -_= �.-, _ -k.: iiih----41--_...,_. r il -,,-, -,...-.,-. ..ii ,f.:4,..,:-'7,V-- _1:. 111 .:1' NH 12 Proposed Roads -III - —11-1--=_..._-iiit.==-_,, . ExistingLand Uses � i!!ii..1,w_....„,............1l Tie ,,��� ----,,t►.. ihr1 Proposed LandUse ---- — 1•.II NH 12 %,��tt ----- -- . LDR (0.4-0.5 DU/AC) � �F ti ::,I '` • MDR (5.1 - 10.0 DU/AC) Parks I Op en Space __ Resort 0.2 0 0.2 0.4 Miles N (0)01-21 p.6 EXHIBIT D NH12 - Existing General Plan Designations E3 NH 12 Boundary Existing General Plan Designations LDR (0.4 - 0.5 DU/AC) Parks/Open Space (R-LDR Back-up; N 0.4 0 0.4 Miles 0\4) -0 -0;7- (2A /•.) GENERAL PLAINT CONFORMANCE CHECKSHEET LAND USE ELEMENT Conformance [,•v.<: ,a. <:i+$%y)�::�•7ii?s i��s��\.,Jv`i.r• w-,y<^< ::;Z'.[), •-< ..�. a\..>4). `K': ,:�:.a> •.f![ �..,, Y::P:�Y,Ti t•.>s -S^ti ite w .... .. .. �,,......... ..t•.... ....:.. ...: :...:: r ,. .4rr:.:> r ..� t, >i:a..i� .r. ,'ii!C :.:v}? :k[ F'1'..!:.. ... ,.. ..... ....... <,.. r ... t. ...r,.:.,. +..: •.•.,....,. r,. �>' Jolri`a;.'.+';tal; C�4>".. .,:•.. 5,���:t.« .k.., '''..,�..a>.>•.. ..t. ....,.. .., .,..:....•d. ..+..... Q n ....{a. �.r.. r.>...... ........>..? )..,A. ,r. fb Z..r.. .,.�' y n• .<,C' �''r`••'•o� <., ..•� '•S Y. �t,. �/rw,.:`^,y Y.•<);,> >'f. �>T." .•c'� .`�',•,...:: ,•+., V ai. �.`'W. ro. ..[ .}r. f:. iL..aL.Yd r..•w a S.tv=tiT>. �?'.. ,r;i: .:! F�.,`•�f..•`�r%'N^.,..•...T f. ..L'?•i'4.w X L. r Cc... .r •! ,w, �`.: .<.. moi.. <. .r:- ..{!i, .�. ,o ..w. .�'.. -� YYY .,.1v>., .>.:. .�',. ..3�i"y..,•. ,�,.:4/fl.y. t..... <�+ .<.. -:,.. )4-., ... .. ..-.,.... ... ..w -•...-.. :•`• i..,, .... ...Jr. ,:! / '.SrSSi!:-, r/•". .:�-Y�r..!:•;; .. .7...., ..,nL..: ^�....).,. ,. a�rq..•;4w<S nk.:':::: .. .. .. .�:� ..; �._ tura�•�onoran �ro.nrr�e.nt,a. . .,,f„' ., .O.{.. ) .. ... ... ....,... :..-,...�., ..: •:.� .•,.i`+. ::Y<::..>„-;r.:s4,i>::t::;•^N:1°:... r.- ,(`ice",`r,.. r. r'�" .' a.,v.•?.>:: •<oe, ..... .� ..... se ..e.(fir .,..< s.w .,..;+......3 r .,... ., .J.t-,.. ....,5<..,..< .x. ....:...,.,.....,...:<.,Y.es 1...,-.. .}h,1Gv ^St•'i•+Gw>t'. .1": :.•n :.`'S:.•r- . ..r:.,.: .....c:`. ..: �.fiit,.Y.r`�ii.. ... .. ....., .; w <•,.,..!•.....�.. ..,:3*.fflef...t•.d. .YY.,. ,k .•t).vt...k2v.>.5:!,. .aw< ,i•'i �7vy•!�:`!r 'Y. aY, ✓n,,ey O.a l ... r..... ,r.•w ,.>r s t...5,. )e..........w. ,... ....•:• . ,;,..,XS +J,'`,. ,r. ^,ww^ .YT.. -< r n-}oa 1 .('... .R•w.v.. r..Y.w,. .-f.;,f.,;...:./,bt,>.....�.... :<..^� ..<.. . .�. y�-,.,�,.•wks;,< .... .w...T. «e.. ..... /...�....:,. ....4.) .. .... ., ....!. ........? .a, ,.. kms.•, .u[i.S,e;.��: •.::,t{vsY" .<l."r'f. 'KH:..•.M'� ,...)tom.,..:a<,.{. ,>Y• "�'.,.�.... .,..., ... F_.» <. ��:::'•.:;. �,q,�v.� :.uk h. w•• .�. w •.a!� ,•[ �ari!r..a4• :�,<'� ;!'r.Ali.:•• f T•"•••""• s fl'� rat,.,fi.... �.. ti .. , .. �,Y•r....,...:.. .,....:i'::r:> r:•.,i'•ki:, .:�i.: .2`, :'� -�;..�. s k4. w ..,�•-:. . w.. :v.,v vv :2 ...rY.,,... .:i)✓ M:o::�"ilf". ,,( �''' <.r<z.«+ R ,f:,li•. n,Xlr....^X%;' :l >f:Y* .::•tr:» <-Y,?C^w�l .x. Y;i^N...f�.. w•S•= •%c';:o;<.,. •.a,•. r.Y..:..... ...... .. ..... :....«-. .{•:.4 f.-.s.s+, Y, ..rY:........;. w.p...•.:.:. •. ..•....,:.,...:.. ,..,-. )T� .;y .,sY ..R>!>. r) ...,>:... .. >R.ro�v...K.. .. .,. ... .Y. .. .. .+. ., <..r.•.,. s .,� r,r.:�':`is 2' X S.' ,...R,..S�?:tw...)y:'�:. r :.� 3et. ..:.,........r..Ya>,.:!:6: .ri'^........... ... .,,.. � I� ,.f� ,d.,::..,.'�..<..rfoR a)-.:+Cr i.•,4'?�-.t<. .<. .'�..a ��//;i• '��.� .,�. �?3, ,r::.y.:3„ _�.`.r'' rse�w:rt!r;:T:"•L i r .. ..Y ..s ..,..,...: y�� ,..+.. .. ....<.. X... Lt- ,.•E,n`<>l.�:,yc ..<, •�.,2,. :� r3�..R:.. ;'r/.: `�'�^� ,>.:,+t'z:C>'Xhy.a-'•." s�af�r.: .. ,. ,.. ,.. :.- .,...a,,:r,... ..:.. •,>,.rf ..:r.: C ��u, .:w� f.ivn-..✓y Z.'�iaf;4C �•w'T f.. .s.r•t"%3£i'!v�t :Y:- f >A•... `� :i1 P�l. ,�.�l�e.:.r'.S. .,.r':,w s. `YM' .:2. �"�, :-r.. .r. :;r:�r >:�L.•LYc.: .r .......... ,.:o-..::•..:t., .: � � O Jam■ .. ) .....r tl�e. .... ............,. .. ..n ` .. ...<r ..,.`•>. < L/,. •:M,•r ;:{..• .�'. 4r�-' O�. A .•�'Y/ Nv,. `if7 w,y?!.., ,;�...;;..ti !;»...r.<.<• ...-{t ,... .. ;... ..... ,. .. .... � �...•.: ..r,e4a-. ..,.... o5X 4.... :.:i•'�: y...,.:r'•: '.�' ,rr .y.>Y• .. r.......:... .. ..... ... ....:.>,:a•.. ,a.rt...•.V ... . .r:,... r )..�.. R..Y. w<.w•. ..f 't /.•:.i ......... ..^a.... ...... ... .,..•>....,., \f:....dtY H r. .. .:..--... ':.... .....!., : r ..:.. ....l :t•S.. .4,. "'l t...................... w. 'olicy 1.1B Promote clustering(average density)developments to protect environmentally sensitive areas. Clustering is a development design technique that permits a reduction in lot area and bulk requirements,provided there is no increase in the number of lots,and the remaining land area is devoted to open space. In large-lot or multi-family developments,clustering may also be accomplished by placing building pads close to each other as mechanisms are in place to protect remaining open space. ?olicy 1.1C Clusters should be encouraged for the preservation of significant,passive use,natural open space within residential neighborhoods. The integration of natural open space within clustered developments should promote openness within the housing development. Policy 1.1D The Hillside Development Overlay Zone(HDZ)grading and development standards shall be considered at the time of rezoning and shall supersede when a conflict exists between the land use map and the HDZ standards. Policy l.l E View protection shall be an essential aspect of Oro Valley's community design review and project approval. Policy 1.1H Slopes 15%and greater shall be evaluated for development compatibility,safety,and preservation as natural open (-!").11p. space. Z"'t<.^ u- Policy 1.11 Oro Valley shall encourage the use of building envelopes in master planned communities,which encourages natural buffers between housing units. Building envelopes designate the specific area that can be disturbed in any way during area outside the buildingenvelope must be maintained in a natural state. or following construction. The o s p Policy l.l K Consider development impacts on natural rolling terrain and emphasize low-density developments in these areas. 'Y G f:iyi:�:Y b s.f bf4 'iii i:2:,>•�`'•,/��'�f::Y;f.4» w] {t!t .<{f w i table mix of land:uses throu hnut Prom ... ........,.:. ...:.::g �- ,>� '4,�.. �; ,[��..�_ � ,R4 C t S 0!•:.•,.w,.•>>4.'•'• P ) f:atr:,✓... 'S4.,sf.:,Yy K«' C V 7:f:uvfv d`•tfi . r. .;l. :... t'o»cy 1.2A Encourage the location of residential neighborhoods close to activity centers to minimize travel times. Policy 1.2F Locate higher density land uses and transportation-dependent uses near major transportation corridors. Policy 1.2H Strip commercial developments are discouraged and clustering of commercial developments at specific nodes or villages that are planned with strict aesthetic and design guidelines are encouraged. Freestanding pads are NA. to overall ross leasable area and center des . discouraged,except when expressly permitted in relation g � .f y�:1i'. ...ryyt• ':riAv.. .N 'A' l'• K. . L w • GoaL •.fYiY,„S •i 1 O-pro m oteoint...,;1 ani use siey., las...n...t n.,..,•m and' .yr•Lf".`r'wfs-us.%ie�':li:,•v:S:. r �..:.,.6+w..x.:.'ss:•lu, r.".. Liciui:. 4.!���.,�t'..,.�:.4 <+.<wY•>.>.. '>d,'�i.�•ivi 4•}ror:-•4w-�f� jf. ,- :.�,�•..l, ..�:yt.;3f,. �ic:�.y';L.k'.sf r ••sr:a::•y..r:�•:6=:,,.,..>;�..•..,.i>:,.....;�C?-s�?:,.�,:-�..,.. :'�"�'c 5�,. �'' .. �.K.. r./J,C.,. ... ...<'� :{::, x ,a c)' ..„ ..:..:s,, .:�l•J �11 ,r•,,i.S!".�'' ....w r.`. .....F. .rr4^•>'�.•^t,....�..,.!,i>,t-,......�.. , Policy 1.3D An evaluation of the adequacy of school facilities shall be developed as a finding for all residential land use requests before the Planning and Zoning Commission at the time of rezoning. Policy 1.3E One elementary school site of at least 10 acres should be reserved within developments for every 500 elementary P school level students forecasted to live within the development. 10 4- N r ' Policy 1.31 Ensure safe bike/pedestrian access to school sites from open space,parks,and neighborhoods. cr :Y >. "7�4.. "S+F.,>:r::.'' m•4+.!"IY, /' w t.. 'F[;�S s ;,� �. .... ... .. ..., ..: ..,:. .,. r..:.... ... _).:< ,•� )' tr.3r'rn '.f.. [• .X r•SY. `� a.4 rir�%N f'. :r.[:M.':. ..... ....... ... :. ,... -. .. .,. ...: ........ �.: ...,.. ., ,. .+. ...� r. n., w,>•v`.• ,:<tC4��'f F w�•r,7..' t„ of^ y ... ., .. ',....� -.. ::..... .........:.. :...♦:. '.ti, ;/,r •>f,Y•. 't Vy i.,.:}+ '.fG.�R... ,i"•'! 'a.>'::'' � ...,. .. .� .... ..... ,.. .s r.-.:.,•.w•.,...k:...f,,• r.. �'< ,.v: Y:v' >3< Y Y•C '•:<.pp), S.. >.> Yr-� ✓' '`i3,.,,.,[Y.. ':R;:�rL'-<`.'., :k: ..< , ......w . .: ...e. K.,.)..,...... .:. ,. t.. M> i< ..YA.Q.. .✓.' ..[n..�., r:Y.. .�K... 7G1=:Y. s-ii>:, ..!�' c a>• ,7 ♦.a.a a< Y /.'., ,.>., -Ka.>.ry. f. yk,yfl{,,,..>a>,:•y'•':: 'A':.`'. �: . .;r • : of:it a call: b.urdeIr- • �annm . t�e::Townafiall:.Ensu�-e.tha�t new develo: Linen#aloes n, ,.)."Y�'w._.,..,�f,t.<.. r..�. .. .. .... ..:' '. U .. .....:.. .. .. ....... ,..........-:: «,s.r i••4: ':as>.. �w;..Y. •§iFi'tZ`•:oiYR<. 'n?t:.�!fa<f,,<...M A�.Y .. ... ......... ....:. w.:...,ar..,...,:...;.,,.Y,.. ...�,,..v,•....•.:: .:.•:,Y........ s .X2 4r:. .,...,•,�. :,.,....... Y... v..,. ..-.... :.. .... .r. .. ....., ..,.......: ..,.,...Y.. ,.:.. a 'S:' 'y;tv.r:•�`�•,i'f;o.•. •», �-c�.r�• .�p•''�:� iy.•• ,:�'a.7f vws•,yp ...[.)...,. ... ? ,., ... ..: .. ,: �... _. ..,.:.R.,.,-.... a xw. /a,.r A.. .'S';:s '�...i's� :{' .7h r•.r ��.f,... •`i'i:e'�'.ir :l:5 �)%<,.:.,:}. !t Q%eF<i' ,� �... :.N. r .3�kYr..s «5,•: a>:: Y'• .r`�r:t�wyi,iYy� •,.,Cl?�••sL`: .r.`�+,i:.�1w`;A f: :?5�!'rs.T;••t.a.L> F:. .,ti.. .) l:, c fk� l..i" w-:4 .-;....; .. .:.::•,..:., .�... ....r..s, -...>,'r.✓rc r,•.:<.,.u.Ck. .ti.f'''' a,a<' '>✓L�`...s !•li. .M,r,..4._ �.. 4.:1.- •'>�: .T.' ;1ii.. ,.��r •... .' >;>a„ ... :.,..:y:,.1r..:..,r'{,..'.:.r,w.,.a ... ..: ..:.,.. 5?�t!k.•+ty!': :7e)'. of. •r4:.. Yvt�'f�8a.r.:.t.•s: �»:Rb:'if,.:isri„i�t' �.?...rwv� 'M& .rt.r... .t•.k w..,.. ....,<. � ♦ •.:� . .,.a >. :�w �ns'.':<>it...,..,...•.� a`:Y:'. )1!"'.�++r•••..'4•"t'Y.'.<�i•'r�..t.3► ..�X. �y,y�, >•yW. �H.�n:,: iJ • ..s. .. ...,......... .. .. .. �. .w\.. ..Y r;t S!4{ ',iF.r<,a•,1^.:r•Rt.'d 3'!!..."aew}•�'>'Y>rM o.N!'T. !r !" r+•... ,N'^W Y•aVr �jY. YM:::!`!�.».. • .N :.4. i": if• .�. dmfs. l- .<: Y :S•C „< :J .. . :,:::.:..: .. esu ... ._ . .. ......:.. .. D �stin r ,. .:> :.: .. ...- .. .:.. ... ...:...,• .... [.�. „ t :< •rr -> ')4:'ti rf. ...:ii., a<::�:•..t ry�..s.'Tl'$R �. ri+ -:r, >. Y. •:E ::-i,:. ,.8, �.a.s ni :<. S.J. aY).,, :.�,i:< a^.:c':r`".f,.:.� .. ,.: ...• ...•..,,,,,.;:..:.:,!;;...•„,w..!.. .o •:YI ��:..i:"r :i:�l.\ .,T/ ..J. +•r•,•d2;4`...,>...<. 'r S:'.'y ..... .... .., i:;d Policy 1.4A The long-term fiscal impacts to the Town and its taxpayers relating to proposed new developments shall be evaluated decidingth a criterion inapproval or denial of land use rezoningproposals. ase ►nformance:C=conforms;D=Doesn't Conform;NA=not applicable;U=unknown,too close to tell,etc. ake any notes regarding conformance on the back of the sheet. Admin PZ\FORNIS\Development Review\General Plan Conformance Table.doc Page 1 GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE CHECKSHEET CIRCULATION/TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT Conformance s.,�;,:{e;•::•},� _.�, :•L•,sl,'�!t•. i;a r'i•y.y�`.^t3=s;�,r:> '�.,:ci:�•{{,,%$">��BiclZ�"�s:�>?1..<<.�`�rr, ........... ...:•..:....;.....:. .. �..:::......:. '<r••.:,,,.Y .:•. :,/.:'/..t ..:'%5`tr .u.'f.� J ,:< Ywk:o, :�. .,f,..:l•�kt,.Y+,r,a,. �L.: n4f��C:.<1'....l,. 't:'Y.,L'.".' w s. ), �a^ ,x:#, w,l :.!'.�.a'Y .3 •� _ :`]...�:;• ,.'.:<.':k;•vY:i''a,...•]<..q Xwr�;,.,Y). 'a':,5i.•%:- '>`:..r:)s:: .. ::: �... 'vim;:•::..:�: ;..�....: .:..... ...... .. -:.: ... ,. .:... ......�....:". .r.�.r,i.•......t::,...•.. 'N. r... < E>. +)'..va, > ..i• '^�1T:h. .<.. '•r���. .... .. ... ... :.,......"..::•. .:. ,.i.u. .. .....< ..,. e... :t�, :r t i• =xr:: ,,:4<:Y:::...r a....?�`':?' =.�F• :w. J. a. Y .:; .., .,:: .:�....-..<.�.:-. . .� _-'.. ;.. .... ,tr:affr��c�r.;c�Ta�ao��o;�e�-v,�;b;�::..�.<: :��: , •''.a: d efficient vehicular:.and notn,me torized} ��� fe :conventen�.. n o�. sure.#h . ....... .. .:............ '. ..v.,..<...' n.... ... .. ]:. ..+...:......Y:,):S. "it S .. ':''i:f.+.} ��iw''Iw.K. tr[:Y.•.•�6n S..T<Mw� .•iY:•'A}� iS^.. ���l 2.1 ,..r...., >•;:....w..:..!r. ..�.r .. +:v...,..:..:V. .^:...J .. S'. �:L.<+L .'.N)«� ,:�.,E:�wRiYT`sf• ...+.,, 9a'%r A/iu.f4N,'i' .a.+x. b�<.�::•:< ..f]zTv yr. ,R.. ..5., v'v:w*o►r X.:?a!ol•Suzrrv�wr..<A w'?<... ++rr. ,.:<.. .Y.s 1' J> 6• • .>•....<•..:•.•,..^:,• .i •.. ..., .. %4:: •:i` •`Xv �. ..:: :^iGir+'� .i�'`..}d':�.r< .�• <,.....a••o-.c...,..<,£.aK�cA.at......:;:t.. ... ..:: ..,.<•�.. .. ". ;..., ..<.. <.?►�>t�.. '.Z'YY. ..�<: !/ ^.::4�a�. .,. •:::Y •»>r.%. :<_•.�`>fre..: .wl�:: :s:.tt¢!ic ��<•�;�.... ,.,ara. �' ..,;:.....: ..:..�.;..,.. .::... 'M ,:,..a.. .<. .. a Ys. :.<r te..a« ...:/fi! ;fY..• t.r..<ui• !�a.. rx;�f:!.. l.,V ,,f�� .n. -�/•..a, r.< <<� :< i�`i.''dL�.l.... w.J .^?4 �"�:� ,@-...:�;>..,r '.�kh..r. ...a�-. o�f.�'G..a :•.'4";.0�t ./:�`; a:•„•^«`•^:� Y?;!t'a :y Y< r..:,.Y•S iw n�l� ,74.7 �'— ,•f+d s?A 1f...R:t,. p .9.:::�/•Cv:e)<�<Y]ri. +'h .f.w :t 4i•.<.1:,41, t"f`. .>�..': :.SY'.�),,,••.'!<.v. I... SA7 .✓:•... r�.^: V.. :ak:'.Y.?6`.�i.b',S�""t. :V•, .J.t_v ..,,..;.<!- .:A:,a•..•:•.,•f:�::a� .w r>_. >� vJ '�J/ .,!<, :.+ ,.4a. ..:yT::.' Y'``.�"J C«..<vY�aJ•,,:•�.. ."�. h tfie�co.mm un.•::.::...:' ' '.: >o-. n throw . .:.:._... .: : ^.�iY.,..,.._.,.. ::.�.......:..... within a d � ._, sidewalks, sufficient outside lane width,and provide other specific provisions for safe and convenient use of olicy 2.1D Build arterials and collectors by bicyclists and pedestrians. .l E Bike vehicle and pedestrian conflicts are to be minimized through appropriate design standards. N( ' 'olicy 2 � ,r L... ', ,,.:. :•^vZ; ,;: F',.f %{v r -%!'SZ`iA•.:f, ..�'F q:•v +f-v�y.�as?'<�J.,r� :r>^ cY.sy`:' .. _. .,......,.. _•Y. y.,; '. ..: .:�i• :i:;.i �...�r rf -..•. .r 1k`)v','.i\,3,,r,y.v; •�`�".•)<,r ..t a}..t.r..f,�".:<� �'`��>�� ;�;bl.<!}<�•�.•��. v ,•.<,.v,�Y 4 a't<,..S+.w3�,.e:fy._ }!.Z`�;' •,aae. < .,rd S r.. to `..! �( �fy /•r/ f .,,:. ,.. ..... :., .,.. ;. il•ky �llC��':nl�e���tr'a!�e.���.. .t�<r-< a redu:��on fl�tr�#'fic:�,o.�u�nes an � ' .;�- •�: ..that:' .ro.m: tesN�. .■/��J■ ..q•'f3`�R,d'LCh"..r:: ',/-,;�xS:fxA .v't,,N.�i F '••.... ftJ <�f"'n: .)+` 'F'.FIr/fir�,^�% N,x! . . :.:.. .:..>.. .. ans .or#a. . . .. ... .. ... . L � v.�,.. .:�.i,:':K,�$si,� z]�•.y���>..�< ,. ..,�... ..�..�:...... 'olicy 2.3Bpaths Bike should be constructed,where feasible,to separate bike and pedestrian traffic from motorized vehicles in �1 order to provide safe access to schools and parks. 'V 91- 'olicy 2.3C All nein or reconstructed collectors and arterials should include sidewalks. .... ..,::. ... ..:,'.,,. ...,...�;:.„..::, �...:,: :i. 'L.. .:,J". .} !] .r.- <.. :Y•:.. ..Y,t'n,,. :t f:''_'.C.r'tC y<, JSs� !1`x r`a f r C� (��a'•(.:yr +� yet"<: .� r•\%: �'•S].h'1R�t L'r:Yi<7,.').. n'fi. 7 3, •.•.;f:!: fly,• ,• �r <'� ;4;, f>,-•1f-.rS'w•) �"di.:)<.. ':fi�c: i•4 *p.rf*gy:Aps9E94 ..1.\a11 a>w..._ e n of oo:ds�se�-v�ces,m oye:metit b ., '-.!.<•.Y>>z%•: !rr). >_, :z 444� .:.. theeff x . . .. .. ....<:........ .,,.,:; 4.� _ •ir���_. . ... .. d e f or. .. :... ........ . .:. . ,.. ....+ ..Y.. .:....<,u. > .AJ.i':y ` � 4 !: ova ..... ,. ..w ...:. .....a...g .r� . f � �:,:. nr..�//� �..- :. .:.Pr. .. .. ..... .... ..... ....., . ,.. . . :Myt {:r`<..• :�.� :..:. .. �.. .. .:..... .. :... ".,...w.. .. ..<.... . .as",..v., vieta ` ^ � ..i2•,...7 oA <• 5.,!Lfe�L'f!l<�,. i ..�•�.. .> .H. ..Y.. rY aiA.w..WaYAY�'' if:.N:{...• :t:bi%Y,•>:�'n:E�:". /• .. .. ..•. .. .... ...-..,.:. �• ...:.:�. ::.,. :.::- -': •: .�' :r:"...:r,. > .'i>Sw+•..L)o,..f`':<,:. .va :.!..•,.^: <�l.. iJ''r.:<:�.'{'.. /.� {'. Sil,`r:: .,. 4., r ..�,+-�!i.w :.J.).!.:7 J'<.�.Ajt 1«.. f. --�''W.-<`'. :,.. '��. �T•^^' ��!.:,, �:�$$..7 4 ;<i✓'X :.vt;,w::rv�., Z..:3r.']`r.J.,R_ .l.,,.7';`e!:..M. r '.. <�_:yam.!• .. ■M■ s ✓:,r: ,,yy,, `..< f:.:•,;•t .'�.�" S%< 9i. .)' t��a])w+w«.-,iyti•. !i:?�• +^6�., n :'iroh-men <. J /.. a%Mr "� .r5=.,��. .ati :� ,.r w. 3d"L SSL'Y'.A ,G::...r �\'.•Yl�r ".��5'<tL�%. R•e ."r':�. .eser ��.� ..�C' x•tW ^Y^'!: ,Tti,.....'+T:q<, �: ". .l::. i�:f�"=S^:... the-So •�).-- <:,.�. �...., .,�,,.<�:. .a�..���J�;>� �. <� .J..�...Y):]:w..,�.. >; ... ....... .. . ... .. :r• ::Niv i;iY 4= .rte f ). :..:;i., .:�... ...... .`+':{.'. .... .. ............ .... olicy 2.1D View protection should be an essential aspect of Oro Valley's transportation design process. Where possible, permanent protection of scenic vistas is to be encouraged,especially from the Oracle Road scenic corridor. Road construction on slopes should minimize the visual impact of the roadway. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT -. .. .......,, ..'..,. ... ..... .-.... .... :. q'� j�(.4f0 rix y • ��/�■■ ■yam■ :�'1��/�.'y:.S.:]:• : ,f,<w. •'y+}�.? .S< M,':•"Y,v�Fi�,.iw/";�: how OiY�V.. . r.••S.<..�.5.4r!'�')!'".• :�� .~�j'Y"J. fait:. �':.�. :.. ,... � � ��!• �ottb�� � •'fl.K.r..-a:/•. ..i.: ./M..�.i<•w•+ir.., �nancial.and economic siusta�na to mf� �• .. . .. :Ion r .:. :... ._. t3' +Yh• 11 To ensure > • >�: ; : .pv: .. ... 3 'olicy .1F Maintain and enhance Oro Valley's residential/resort/recreation character. Ci d Prepareeconomic development impact analysis for significant development proposals. 'olicy 3.1J Employment-related uses are encouraged to provide work places for a growing employment base. Office,technical,and corporate employment facilities shall be compatible and consistent with the scale of the surrounding area. Campus-type employment centers that emphasize a unified architectural theme,pedestrian orientation,inward- transportation patterns,and a natural landscaping theme are encouraged. These employment centers do not include high-rise structures or heavy industrial uses. 'olicy 3.1K Heavy industrial and outdoor commercial uses that require significant infrastructure,introduce greater truck traffic, tall incompatible with the Town's vision are generally unacceptable. and are visually and environmentally p 'olicy 3.1L Institutional uses,such as colleges or health care,are desired and will be actively pursued and supported when located in appropriate locations. IN it Specialty commercial development,similar to St.Phillips Plaza in Tucson,is encouraged in appropriate locations. iv id- HOUSING ol,cy 3.lM sp �y P ELEMENT .. .. ...,. .... .. .....,.. ..�.......•..,..:,..:•: ::::-•..�;:}•�� :... .�<,,�ut!: y:'. '1%�►'9' NxGa::'•?2:<i �"::•!J� d.-.fi.'�• ry.p�r-yw:i. • K o . . u... r.;'ed�,en•....t,..,.;.a: l.ne.' g)..ti .rlT:. :0�.r 3. r)s`.f•! k ..<y < i•:f .) f.!.Q ",.•��� Yf Soa•:.A .✓.: sh+yL .: > '�!] �' �:... ., �•.� :�'. ...._>�....� -.�.:.:r.......}.. i appropriate 4.1A Protect the integrity and aesthetic context of existing neighborhoods through g the use of bufl;ers. 'olicy 4. C l Apartment and condominium developments should have built-in recreational facilities and other amenities to serve • residents. .. .. ...... •.. .' .. .•,.: �.�..' .. ..a .. n,:.::•..... .K. •{s••b+'e: a.'.�i'ti� :Y�r.y\iR`SI<<'•w�<wTp'h,•.�Yt•it'>� �µ<t'.��Kw,•,yr+?t^.4. :.. ... :. .. .... :.. �..r.....:.' ..:...,..r..:...:.<. .:...y../.••...<» wr <. �.�. .,,n.b•.:.?�,v...,:Y.•.;;. 'KZ.<s:t�'��:w::F +�.L'•+w. �:Yi 'yoi.,.:. FF :x• .:+.... ...... , .... .. ... .. ...,. .. :� r. . .y.."::.:..�: .,ff:'?c, p... rod s `.. !'1•' ,.. :•,:: .. .. .: .:.:.. .Y:JY<+K'/.} ya}> i• ys%i<t}�K,��.l.::>{':.:.. :�?;•`:.:+ obs/hous�n •balance v+�th�n the reater_Oro..�al1e reg�on� oensurea ... J g... ..:. .... .: y�....r�nah n. .. ....... .. ..x .... ,.:.L. J.:..w,. -'ry ,.�}'::'•.. ..<,>:.<Y ..w•.J, J ,.<(.... -N 1'a'�'2 �. a. 3��}s` <•::_ 'olicy 4.2A Encourage the provision of a variety of housing choices matched to employees within a reasonable proximity of employment sites. mformance:C= conforms;D= Doesn't Conform;NA=not applicable;U=unknown,too close to tell,etc. ake any notes regarding conformance on the back of the sheet. Admin PZ\FORMS\Development Review\General Plan Conformance Table.doc Page 2 • GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE CHECKSHEET PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES ELEMENT Conformance •a;'. r.-mac• ,.,:.,,�.. :.;;�, ..:n.u:� :a;,'`•.3r,';ra.cu8y,rr•�'3'>.` -.r�.r. �.r-s'�c z>c��-'a'>=x�`-t^7`r�>^sa•�.��"••fc;t:•`�.�"'t�H an`"��„'2".•. 3t�• :£'YY�����;a^�J/i'.';i .,✓.. 5r.:• J '%i'._.2rf�es.e !k:. ..ra7•,`.dt�'•r;9�..° �?�..i+t. ;ifr."..,./.f�< .a's+r :+.C..-32z.• :.� .•� ,.,.>s:.:<>:r.F.S;Q .d,sf..+...Lc,'y"...:.,' ..y<•aY�''vf!!/�'�:n�y,.4�._��^, 1r[hKi:i'^'aL...�:' Y:�:^<4)l. x.`F:d.'i3.V:+f'- ,,,o:.;•• v.`� .�� .'�Y:i).r•%' .•.t ,:t:..�-I�i'..,y i.^ f .3. :.J!^:a�.r.. ...'!"�...•(::•Ni`.G:. 't'.:•i:. Y:xif;..5>, R. .4..IS. t• ,,•mow .) I+Y. .�•. ::),: !` r„!;' <:a..,f }... a:w.:t': ;.y ..}. ..a,�w �v,✓rt. a.:' '.e" v i .N•Y ,a--M(. .T. ld..:t,: �33 •:>(C:...�::,; Is»:. .., .,i:. ..... .. :••...,...t•.,.;.... .:w ,<,....iY wt .: 6.!ra'::. wr-; s,•."x`i.;.:•.... .i a i„vY..i':h:5`j'.:.1•. .:.• .........a 'L •n '�._<...Sw .: ...I•a....,./..._ .V F F. .Ir,iA.S,! �vf-:v?:' .fv: f'.....�N: iG i�:.L.��v'Zf. M'�" a.: ,...x...,..�.....„r ...,a ,...... .a,.,iv..... ,.5..<,r„v�,<... ... ..:. .. .C!•r:` it •"•Y >'•i: •� %:i::��. vr,... '':�'� i?'j�v.rr..a•. .:i' .r/ii^ ......... . v Un<..ni'i-n`..>�:.:n.f,.,w.,.a.y;.,14,r. a... .,..rkv. .:. :.�♦.1'.Y>,<• ..a::<,':: s::�.. .!.� .L A �:>... ded:� hen,oeene . .:r � : i ;t: a. f p e ie are_ rove ��.. , � . >.. '�, wr. %�''�• 77ll a� ♦ ..<•.. y�;>,t'•`i..f:Y t>iea<..i:•' ,.•�^' �:'4: N�t .a• �:t:%...<f. .o ,r - :.♦.....,:... .:./ .....� .:• ai. .. .. ...... .:: ..., a.. ::�. �� ..i�..l,.�Sr�afh .t.`�f . .. .. .. F:., . .�...... a T�. .. .. ,_ ....,.�..�( ...4,..:.<...•r....:i^.!•tc ,.0:.i':r•Ii..,. .•$ ,.Sfw:: t��y+a'�••r%?l,a ,.<" �t.. .,;O..Y:n:..>4 <:i./.. ...;f:R,;°•�.a.•:'Lfs2•'•:.1>�•::.v.. .•. ..y.w•..p,`•.,. .. !.....v..:`J ?•i.•.r :.. :a` .:•.r•.,..d+.K k"CLpSi:<>rl.�yK.•:�;i ...•rl�.r s`!'.n.:>.:�:L'•,��::;.ri:..... ..5... , .^.�.. .... _ .. ... � _. ,,, .h!,.•.,C .,fr( ...... :v:i'r f' y :.V� ,�..r..,,l<!•�a;..aK.,YaI� ^:t ..r ..,.{. .. ............. _ _ In cooperation with the school districts within the Oro Valley Planning Area,define both school service areas and Policy 5.1C p associated school needs that can potentially be met through proactive implementation at the time of development N review. Policy 5.1D Ensure that municipal services and facilities are or can be provided efficiently and cost-effectively prior to development occurring. Policy 5.1E All new developments should be evaluated to determine impacts on all Town infrastructure,including but not limited to schools and roads. Such impacts shall be used as a criterion in deciding the approval or denial of land use rezoning H i proposals. PARKS,OPEN SPACE,AND RECREATION ELEMENT .. �... ........... ..^:>:no.. ..., .A/> .r._ a ;.��. 'a r r.<w!' / �/Y. r„ b 1f2•sS'Y.�rw:a�>.y:Hq,s�?i <.r-+.f",. :... ....>... .....,.. ...:.........:<.. .<:. ,... ., ,.:�..,........... .... ... �:Y/ i `�, i.• f ....s._: tF:p ...Y" �.'ff.• ti...k... .< i-w `'c �i•ir.' tY':<i• . .r 1,`'-". '•../.:�� ,..' ...,.. .....' .... ... .,.:. .,... ...,..... .:_ ,<'�.... ,...:,'. .,yf• .,ru>i:"M• 4 . ati•."..t.i` •:i:t . fii' +e'�S••�2•>.�_ i:: `"J(W_::...' fY, .... .,.$. s :v, Lr a'es .e�T•f!.�:' -`�f,ET _�.Y�!f. } ,.gid :r ''�.• MM ectec�' arks o. :en�� e� atn�l�r-a ils:s ste .�.: .• . .:::..:, 'Comp pp'hens ve an�:co:na ... . .. .. .. :.^...� . ,i .� . �y ,�..;�-f� ... : .. '�OJI/ re �.:.r ... ............. ,....;.... ,:� r.a',waI• :,:c• r..i '?�..`i.h. �✓ _. ....: v:el oD a ...... .... .... : � {„1'..a.,k...�,P .t .,,�,`<:r! ^:L'ri•.,.Nic,W�•SK". .�. .•.�f:.-,:t• .. .. .. .'. ode ..,•. -... .....<........ .. ..,.... ., P •+:o.•. •:<�' ,Y:, t.io.,.,a..:.� .::>, •'y<tt'f�l't.�.:a')�SS'i....>.-> ,...Y=���; AA •./�/r•��• ,........:.n.v ....T ...... .. .. :. ... ( ..r F.�7r. •.:i::.i�.ta .c•t..r../;ri.:gi..r. "2'. :l :<i"'•:•.� ..`9>+nf•,..�....�..».:.,.. :. ':r. P k. ,.'�!^.';Q.y::•fn>!...x. .o('rl,��:: an{.. < ,. r .. •;•;.3:f..:.>.�^.....a.. ....):a,4. �i� � '�,ey�f r.......... ..�a ? .. ..a' .. !: it::..l.:.... ro..:)t:r•a#r�(r1A....ylbY..... ... 6.l A Plan for the connection of open space,natural areas,parks,trails,bike paths,and recreation areas to minimize conflicts Policy with the environment. Policy 6.1B Encourag e private dedications of land as permanent natural areas or open space. Policy 6.1D All developments should link their recreation facilities and natural areas to the community open space network where appropriate. Policy 6.1E Trails shall ultimately connect to public preserves and the regional trail network per the Eastern Pima County Trails System Master Plan,where possible. Policy 6.11 Protect existing and establish new trail access points to major washes and regional preserves. J Develop a bike paths system that is separate from the roadways and serves to interconnect various public facilities parks,trails,open space areas,etc. such as schools, p p .t, i,<i� .•.w :4<c:'.r..<.'i.�iY». fy.rY ft<y. y 4�•a�,G ^#i. tr: >!e'- ';1' Y'. :✓. :.•�.:.^^''j.-SSa n: 1 :a. ...2:•,•'i,.7MYn, ��.•:Y ;,.. 'Ssr7" v.,,�'y. .<, `r.!•t..y. 'r.. Y... .6 udd`Y a.:f., i.v t .,J,. xw. l.r. � ,>.w,.r.,c. -!. ,,.: '•,� ..� .a S:,,d. f.Z .ts.v•f"'` !7 ,yy�:•S ....e:....I,...:: ]w �...::ay+... ,... , ;•:..'. ../... -.ra:! Ali�•.'3^w ..9Ia -.>':,i .IFAS•:�y .�w' <:'Y,. ,�' ��� u^T, �. ia.:. ..n.^ ....wa:K.. .:' .....� .. ...: ...�....... :�..i.,r,..i ,/ n,....iC,..:�La. t.:, kx 7!. s -:../.,...�'✓ !>.Y.oi :.5..a•:"'`'�Cai a. YX!_.•yW`.<•' 4c%!`. ......':.. > s? s^ t .r': ..v! ., !•,S,. i..,..� ... :. ....>.. ..., `-::. .i..'a. .:ef^.i� i<:�: )<' •.':i .3i•�:.i a.. .!'�.C... ..�: > w <a .r ::3.� n:r �..... y... `.:1....�.. ... /fi.4..v.x,.....•.. ...,.. '_... :: r%„ �fF•.. •R .�.v.' !:/:'. ,f.Na a�• .y; .:>�. ;.t�' >aux. -�' t a n .. .. ... ...... . /. .� .a� th�a_the ..a� q•>�� ac "f it n�trierifal� sen a M:y w.�,:r env ro !;.ix,,., _ r ..�•-.y Y� .., .r: �. r r-t- .-r�Y.�� 1,. ) .!R�.H' .:Si•<i. K'•� :vA',.<G.'i'•:`.'.i<I.,NvAf..^�X...:^�.,i.. 1v .r ...... : ..... f'�........... .... .. I':IA. i�,y�S a .rf',..w.. '.. - �;:: .�,.,.:� '^�..YS .•. ,-.i .:of/ -:it r �.tl... :i.." ,,, f.w �/.:{�r., .. .. ........ !7t'::•vrik,�i!�`•�y~'a.'i''Y.1"+"+ya.�"!`a:y' 3. h ......... ........... .. ..... .... .. ... .. .... .... .. .. f.. •c 6.2B Open spacepreservation shall be used as a criterion in deciding the approval or denial of land use rezoning proposals. Policy P P Policy 6.2C Encourage natural open space connection to and the expansion of Tortolita Mountain Park. 6.2G Preserve and enhance open space areas that protect the visual,natural,and cultural resources of the community. `- Policy _ SAFETY ELEMENT .. ........, ., ...... ...,.... �...:...r.-.. ..•� :(... .::r•i:.,:.. .c•f.�. >.J )T,,�i ...If:R �,.v�C:.;fi�G 7(%'.fny�.iYf"7•��' r' �S:rYL� :2'....?l O.; •,,<. n.G-1.^:S,• I>, •I r.;:%• �<!'...�:n...7fuS.�✓.1,�;i:y M L!G:M•.p�A'.N .iYf�.�J.S�� F F :k' :�(s. < ::." ..: ,.../X......:.•:::/ t .,,r;.,• ..�.!4. •.r..:;t3'e9 4 ;?f:..ir�',R : /:'/.. , .•. ia.::< "y?C... 4: .. ,...... .. ... :: ..,. '....�.....,'...... )f. .. ..-�,- .....:.i.. : .e..:r:v.. �:::.w•+<.. •! r.. d}• •a.a ':a��:.4.. ..�'h':tl� ..��u �.:I!"°>'. �?i:•v.•. ::.:.•. ..._<.•. ...::•... .!f:.:�.:. ,i'.-.v. .. .. r �';.. .w w • .... .r:,.:..I 1 .. � r ;:lsr'. al.a.. d."':/..Y2,aU.t'�.'$>O I�r�!'�:'FtTi'l+`.:, ..3./.. ..•.ux.y....•..... a ......:.....,a, i2.� . 4 .i.;: y,•"�i.i:r:iL'. ryf:.Z. J«C.S . ....... ..... ':t.'. ••.,.•:•:. :,/P..h ... ... t,I...,a f :r >`5..i'a'.a../a.)•.ti:.fa... f. er.:.:;.•y.''lixt%'�...f:af.. :r. .�'.. iff<..Y.F°" >'S9r' ..<I,,:.i,rw w:�a.���:F�l nwn..t ��:•r:�....�:r:."�.. ' : r. ..:e'y r .2,'�. .f�..,!. .a'4 4 Y .s. .��>. o?'. ,.f.a....a .r....r s,..•!., k '.u�h���� �� .Y..,...... ..,... ..fi :•^s .<� <..,....Y..at r, r.�'.1S�'+7k'i�'a�'r;bs�,`:n �.... /. ..1. ..,e� 4�: ..! x...:.r-Z.�'�;.ir�?�yy�,.:�>. .Itlti•'..,.�yy^,�t�'iy<-'''.l�s°YYK+' y',,,�! '*+'•-'Ifs`i�h. •Cf^ ✓w .n. tial t .�.• x. , .>.� �' •�.. ,. ...�I- . �: rom i1 a�ht�t�:� �.,. ��.. •!.af.�!e.,.i...:.,. � :�: .,. s:. �� ..x � n: '<a.i fi% '::fa. ,.h:t•^' / .C•.•'..)'f...t ����..i,:' ,:. �• .......• :'r• a•Y.: >,, i�a..;y>: "..i': a:..�ff":.i ;�. ..F..,.•. !:. ... ��if:P::.:. Policy 4.1 A School siteplanning in regards to public safety shall be developed as a required finding for development review. 'Rr • :onformance:C=conforms;D=Doesn't Conform;NA=not applicable;U=unknown,too close to tell,etc. .lake any notes regarding conformance on the back of the sheet. ':\Admin PZ\FORMS\Development Review\General Plan Conformance Table.doc Page 3 GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE CHECKSHEET RAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION ELEMENT-CONTINUED Conformance NATUs „fir a:r r aY Y�.,p 4 �w<�p'`��d`*•'< .te�L^r��`(ks�.aP•fy> �/�.r�v'�Y'¢V9h�«: •e',r.• ��•.Y,r�i+".''�;:1n,9.:'o•:y.e.i�i..ftC YS,�o t.,if 9,. .�a•{h�<✓' �v.. `S dY.yL'R'(y�fA^a{M.c}b�:r riix .;v�P� .. • ,.<f� .d p y"',{.w (.< (e!, � i \� '.t _'Xaf.rw 1. yr( ,� .�«� i, .:�- .%i ., tf:1•r ^t.;w a3 res 2e• ,.^mac.:''• S}a i..:a. Af r�`,n ty\:P.:yYiiaqe ..a✓ `e'C''<f.'lg Y';'...,7,I ,.�:., f. .y �. �i 'f�:,.:a,.:'.r':: .r++ y�. 7r... .L::'Y o,x „c.v::r..r.:.`F; /�, •.,.<+ 4 :'��i� • ♦ r. - � <. ,....: �... . :.....•::•..♦:':\ .:.:::;::%� ...cY::. is rj,, .Y.^ t> .lie?!•`: �: ,Mize u eS=mach .. g �s :«wa.�.• �.., ,� _ :`a..'L1:�Y LJ�"LVs7Y .;.�••;7'i.•r :tr'.::.i'S.'!;�.; ix ». ,t.tA•t�•14:.'.�fik• �!'.fe;�^...r���.:.^l- ... .. irotect thelann� g� - ,.e�,� i-�a�� �:,��9 •,r az�'�,�,�af:�:.�:.,��,;�>;��'-a.Y��..,,�`<.<, 3� To�p �' .����.^�.�K�,���.. .. �. ,.. . )hcy 8.1 C Wash encroachment may be p ermitted where floodp tains are broad and shallow in order to permit a reasonable N (�_ `�of ro erty,unless such encroachment impedes natural groundwater recharge of theaquifer. � utilization of P "balanced basins"and any future basins designated as such,Pima County 1 basins designated as 1 R- )licy �licy 8.ll✓ For drainage g licies and re u]ations shall be adhered to.Floodplain Management po g8.lF Allow only floodplain-compatible uses in flood-prone areas. vegetation and ri arian habitats should be maintained and enhanced where possible. L )licy 8.1G Indigenous(native desert) g P clicy 8.1H identify and protect light-sensitive uses and locations,i.e.Kitt Peak,Mt.Lemon,Mt.Bigelow,and the Pusch Ridge Ct Wilderness area. COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT k: - nr.� a ' Ysi�� �_.. �:•,:�:a.L..ikr+i.„ n r.r..yi* , 1io0. »f- �ii;s. „..,-;,<!,-!:'4 vau.. -Y•t^,t:'1J !.”...•/✓.5f......;. K � W R jyv �'�b6<Ai f � ���� t ,oal� T�enauretha{the built � nd, :tla:wtl,th. iiausemr.!.%C�1 [ : s^. < ,, a=>Ly�kv . . r °.�� .., ��.....r.�Y•• : .. .�<: o { a. 'r � 04Ww olicy 9.1D All development proposals should attempt to arrange buildings,massing of buildings,and/or arrangements of lots to g g preserve views from adjacent properties and streets while providing privacy for residents. olicy 9.1E All development proposals should show design strategies used to minimize changes to existing topography and the C..- disturbance of existing vegetation. j`rd' olicy 9.]F All sides of buildings may impact their surroundingsand should be coherently designed and treated. 1 olicy 9.1G In order to maximize integration of the built environment with the natural environment,and minimize distractions of the built environment,all new development proposals should incorporate means of reducing the apparent size and bulk of buildings. iTia- proposals should consider existing landscaping within 400 feet of the project site to provide and y y.�1 All new development 1-i, r maintain landscape continuity within the community. CULTURAL AND HISTORIC RESOURCES ELEMENT .s ( �, ':�.•�+..-C.t'tek'a� ``y°er.af...t'i`y�� �' ii.,1-i';' ..".• .: F :/ .<•.>i r <.,:.: ..'.' .: l<.(. .,i�'•y r•:.,c,..s•r;f r" T.../.:`u4s 4.L e. � u-a* 'y�r��.�.��a (y: r 4 ,. .•, ..-... _ ?.� ..•�!,+f Cl.,. +,�iC'<N rosV• e.; � � ••ff .,. ...:..,......• •. '::-... ... :...:.. !....•.'. .. .e.,";f••p; .. :.. �... r. ,Y'. �. •a;y!,i( �.�: ;K r;3- f.,. FGf�•ly���`��,.q,� ./.. ..\ ....w. ../...r( ..,r4 ,,,,,,e:.,,F,(K... wsr'� ..or. :, .�. ./..lr✓rt. w..:. .!-�.L,,, : . fY pie:: :a ,, r.��r� f. ..,. ori �: a �n �:,r(. >, l n 4 thin'�t ;r � _. r, a �p cies :� .w � . !f:K.. : •,;i :v} r9!,..f +r,. rf 1.t4t' ?�e,,,,:4;%;i To reserve.t a un�q cu to �,�.���,�,.�.,> ���.,�, .. . .... Y". uy 'olicy 10.2A Require cultural resource surveys for all new developments where evidence of cultural/archaeological resources is found. 'olicy 10.2B Ensure protection of cultural resources discovered during construction. H R- mformance. C =conforms;D=Doesn't Conform;NA=not applicable; U=unknown,too close to tell,etc. ake any notes regarding conformance on the back of the sheet. Page 4 ,Admin PZ\FORMS\Development Review\General Plan Conformance Table.doc N 18 V 11 O H C) til N' 1 Z I , ..a► 1 r4--ET—Lf-- ------EKT-aiv umx-Nw z 1 -1 rn x -13 c 3 I N) o ,■., 0 ,.,,,,, ,,,,„ \\:,\,,,,\ '\\\\\. \\\. \\vs\ "13 • \\, \\\\\, \\‘ ,\\\$„ ..„.\\\\‘,:\s\- ,\ ,,,,:\,: - 0 004' „„„..,,„,„\\,„\\\„. .N-s\N 0 m -0° ,_ O. X.I., ..6. 0 .... '13 03 N > •••11 3 ov i) ,....... CD Om t •, . 0 :s3 �,. m Oz . ._ 41. C = -.I -rz; O *"l' c 0 -, * 0 x C 0m Do ,s, a) a in 3 3 w 7.- m M u) m J , ._ 03 c„,„ —......... 2 i r cp m p, Zrtrl c) a) i . . Exhibit C NH 1 2 p ro posed La nd Uses ■ ;41 f, �, "'y �.ce.ymt 4.1.:,,,;:,...„:„._,.. ,, ,, , :.4,:„.. ._.. k„,._ , 1 • pyy�.�ma�'�'x ,..:, . „,,:e- , 4,:.:,.,,o. ,4, ,..,,,,i .-ii, ti £4.=r i r. Z'£ -ice::�"" y.' Y4� S ; (Y✓- �11� ‘.' . ' `arc )111-Ai*--4-7`-'''''= _ c i 4J�:�{.' - pip <,,mac..- ,J _ 1 1 �I t , Lc ..-, „......_— ,... ,„ , ,,,,,,, , vil Mk --' ,. (0 -';.,1,1.4ilt --. - -.7 '''':.i--,--. ' -: '- - Atiat, . -'''';..,.7,..' do IN :-:,-..-.. , ---- -.,..,„,,,:i, ofeit 1,:_fc:oRt'',:---:4 , Ht4 ---,iT,--„ S* --,. ,, ,,,--$4,,, .' ,,.! _ t iik.„,-„, . , ....,, .„.,,...„. 4.';-tat £,_V y '` ,_ -- i....:„. --,::-., , 1 ',--,-.frilif;:- :_:„;-,;!-7-2-- ,\ •.::;, . ‘:, --,4' . ..,.._,.... .. , , ..„..., ,,,,....,,,,E,„„,.. ,,,,„.„,...„,,.,,,,, ---,,,,,, _.._ :.,. .. , ,_.... . ,._.,. . , 4 ,, . _ ,. :. :;,,„,,,,i,„.14,_ , ,,L\ , , ;, O , ..r., \\._., .,,,,. , .,..,._, ,, _ ,, . • , . . , , .„....„...„.,, .._ _ . . ,...„ , iNhil si . It i .... iir,„ ,‘ ,_\ orf L,,,, . _y K f $ �T? NH 12 ProposedLf- Roads 0 (c ' , --- y`, Existing• Land Uses =f NH 12 Proposed LandUse .. ...... ,, ,. .‘,, . ---- LDR (0.4-0.5 DU/AC) 0 ,- ,'WI', -----'r: ' . ....,,.... ---_..--,,,-=i ' ..: \ :: MDR (5.1 - 10.0 DU/AC) ,--,_ ., I Parks / Open Space Resort 0.2 0 0.2 0.4 Miles N EXHIBIT 0 NH12 - Existing General Plan Designations Q NH 12 Boundary Existing General Plan Designations LDR (0.4- 0.5 DU/AC) Parks/Open Space (R-LDR Back-up; N 0.4 0 0.4 Miles