HomeMy WebLinkAboutPackets - Council Packets (1430)
AGENDA
ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL
REGULAR, STUDY AND SPECIAL SESSION
JULY 1, 2020
ONLINE ZOOM MEETING
Join Zoom Meeting:
https://orovalley.zoom.us/j/91220575177
To attend via phone only, dial 1-669-900-6833 then enter Meeting ID: 91220575177
Executive Sessions – Upon a vote of the majority of the Town Council, the Council may enter into Executive
Sessions pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes §38-431.03 (A)(3) to obtain legal advice on matters listed on the
Agenda.
REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 5:30 PM
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
EXECUTIVE SESSION - Pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.03 (A)(3),(4), (7) to instruct its representatives about the
acquisition, purchase, sale or lease of real property within the Town limits, and/or receive legal advice thereon,
and/or to discuss, consult on, and consider its position the above described matter
RECONVENE THE REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS
COUNCIL REPORTS
TOWN MANAGER'S REPORT
The Mayor and Council may consider and/or take action on the items listed below:
ORDER OF BUSINESS: MAYOR WILL REVIEW THE ORDER OF THE MEETING
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
CALL TO AUDIENCE – At this time, any member of the public is allowed to address the Mayor and Town Council
on any issue not listed on today’s agenda. Pursuant to the Arizona Open Meeting Law, individual Council
Members may ask Town Staff to review the matter, ask that the matter be placed on a future agenda, or respond to
criticism made by speakers. However, the Mayor and Council may not discuss or take legal action on matters
raised during “Call to Audience.” In order to speak during “Call to Audience” please specify what you wish to
discuss when completing the blue speaker card.
PRESENTATIONS
1.Introduction of new Oro Valley police officers by Chief Riley
CONSENT AGENDA
(Consideration and/or possible action)
A.Minutes - June 3, June 10 and June 17, 2020
B.Resolution No. (R)20-32, authorizing and approving an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) between the
Town of Oro Valley and the Pima County Jail to provide officer coverage and access to a video link at the
jail for video proceedings between the jail and the Court
C.Request for approval of a Conceptual Architecture request for a new multi-purpose building at Pusch Ridge
Christian Academy
REGULAR AGENDA
1.MATTERS RELATED TO A POSSIBLE AGREEMENT WITH 1) THE CANADA HILLS COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION/CANADA HILLS MASTER COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION AND/OR 2) THE VILLAGES OF
LA CANADA MASTER ASSOCIATION GENERALLY ABOUT FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTIONS TO TOWN
GOLF OPERATIONS (The HOA Agreement will be posted prior to the Council meeting)
A. EXECUTIVE SESSION (IF DESIRED OR DEEMED NECESSARY) - PURSUANT TO A.R.S.
§38-431.03 (A)(3), (4) FOR LEGAL ADVICE ON THE ABOVE DESCRIBED AGREEMENT AND/OR TO
DISCUSS, CONSULT ON, AND CONSIDER ITS POSITION ON THE ABOVE DESCRIBED AGREEMENT
B. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON THE ABOVE DESCRIBED AGREEMENT
FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS (The Council may bring forth general topics for future meeting agendas. Council may
not discuss, deliberate or take any action on the topics presented pursuant to ARS 38-431.02H)
ADJOURNMENT OF THE REGULAR SESSION
STUDY SESSION
CALL TO ORDER
STUDY SESSION AGENDA
1.PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION REGARDING THE ORO VALLEY PRIMARY EMPLOYER
INCENTIVE PROGRAM
2.PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION REGARDING THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY'S PROPOSED
ANNEXATION STRATEGY
3.DISCUSSION REGARDING THE TOWN'S FISCAL YEAR 2020/21 BUDGET
ADJOURNMENT OF THE STUDY SESSION
SPECIAL SESSION
CALL TO ORDER
SPECIAL SESSION AGENDA
1.DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING THE TOWN’S FISCAL YEAR 2020/21 BUDGET
ADJOURNMENT OF THE SPECIAL SESSION
The Mayor and Council may, at the discretion of the meeting chairperson, discuss any Agenda item.
POSTED: 6/24/20 at 5:00 p.m. by pp
When possible, a packet of agenda materials as listed above is available for public inspection at least 24 hours prior
to the Council meeting in the office of the Town Clerk between the hours of 8:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m.
The Town of Oro Valley complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If any person with a disability needs
any type of accommodation, please notify the Town Clerk’s Office at least five days prior to the Council meeting at
229-4700.
INSTRUCTIONS TO SPEAKERS
Members of the public have the right to speak during any posted Public Hearing. However,
those items not listed as a Public Hearing are for consideration and action by the Town
Council during the course of their business meeting. Members of the public may be allowed
to speak on these topics at the discretion of the Chair.
In accordance with Amendment #2 of the Mayoral Proclamation of Emergency issued on March 27,
2020, the following restrictions have been placed on all public meetings until further notice:
1. In-person attendance by members of the public is prohibited.
2. Members of the public can either watch the public meeting
online https://www.orovalleyaz.gov/town/departments/town-clerk/meetings-and-agendas or, if they
would like to participate in the meeting (e.g. speak at Call to Audience or speak on a Regular Agenda
item), they can attend the meeting and participate via the on-line meeting application,
Zoom, https://orovalley.zoom.us/j/91220575177, or may participate telephonically only by dialing
1-669-900-6833 prior to or during the posted meeting.
3. If a member of the public would like to speak at either Call to Audience or on a Regular Agenda
item, it is highly encouraged to email your request to speak to Bluecard@orovalleyaz.gov and include
your name and town/city of residence in order to provide the Mayor/Chair with advance notice so you
can be called upon more efficiently during the Zoom meeting.
4. All members of the public who participate in the Zoom meeting either with video or telephonically
will enter the meeting with microphones muted. For those participating via computer/tablet/phone
device, you may choose whether to turn your video on or not. If you have not provided your name to
speak prior to the meeting as specified in #3 above, you will have the opportunity to be recognized
when you “raise your hand.” Those participating via computer/tablet/phone device can click the “raise
your hand” button during the Call to the Public or Regular Agenda item, and the Chair will call on you
in order, following those who submit their names in advance. For those participating by phone, you
can press *9, which will show the Chair that your hand is raised. When you are recognized at the
meeting by the Chair, your microphone will be unmuted by a member of staff and you will have three
minutes to speak before your microphone is again muted.
5. If a member of the public would like to submit written comments to the Town Council for their
consideration prior to the meeting, please email those comments to mstandish@orovalleyaz.gov no
later than sixty minutes before the public meeting. Those comments will then be electronically
distributed to the public body prior to the meeting.
If you have questions, please contact Town Clerk, Mike Standish, at 520-229-4700 or email
at mstandish@orovalleyaz.gov
Thank you for your cooperation.
Town Council Regular and Study Session 1.
Meeting Date:07/01/2020
Introduction of new Oro Valley police officers
Subject
Introduction of new Oro Valley police officers by Chief Riley
Summary
Attachments
No file(s) attached.
Town Council Regular and Study Session A.
Meeting Date:07/01/2020
Requested by: Mike Standish Submitted By:Michelle Stine, Town Clerk's Office
Department:Town Clerk's Office
SUBJECT:
Minutes - June 3, June 10 and June 17, 2020
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
N/A
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to approve (approve with the following changes) the June 3, June 10 and June 17, 2020 minutes.
Attachments
6-3-20 Draft Minutes
6-10-20 Draft Minutes
6-17-20 Draft Minutes
D R A F T
MINUTES
ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL
REGULAR SESSION
JUNE 3, 2020
ONLINE ZOOM MEETING
REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Winfield called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Present: Joseph C. Winfield, Mayor
Melanie Barrett, Vice-Mayor
Joyce Jones-Ivey, Councilmember
Rhonda Piña, Councilmember
Bill Rodman, Councilmember
Steve Solomon, Councilmember
Absent: Josh Nicolson, Councilmember
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Councilmember Jones-Ivey recited the Pledge of Allegiance.
UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS
Town Clerk Mike Standish announced the upcoming Town meetings.
COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Jones-Ivey reported that she attended a ribbon cutting for Sparkle Cleaners.
TOWN MANAGER'S REPORT
Town Manager Mary Jacobs provided the following information during the Town Manager's report;
Overview of the new shopovaz.com website launched on June 1, 2020.
Services of Davidson Strategic would be utilized to help the town develop and implement a
customized program designed to assist businesses in Oro Valley in successfully conducting or
restoring business amid the closures or the new practices as necessitated by the COVID-19
pandemic. This service would be funded by the Cares Act or Town funds that would be freed up as
a result of Cares Act reimbursements to the Town.
Two informational Zoom meetings would be held regarding Proposition 480: Permanent Base
6/3/20 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 1
Adjustment. See the Town's website for further information
Expect delays on La Canada starting June 4, 2020, due to the installation of a flashing pedestrian
warning light at the crosswalk of Canada Hills and La Canada Drive.
ORDER OF BUSINESS
Mayor Winfield re-organized the agenda as follows: Regular Agenda item #1 would be moved to item #3,
item #2 would be moved to item #5, item #3 would be moved to item #4, item #4 would be moved to
item #6, item # 5 would be moved to item #1, item # 6 would be moved to item #2 and item #'s 7 and 8
would remain as posted.
Mayor Winfield provided the guidelines for participation in the Town Council's Regular Session Zoom
meeting.
Councilmember Nicolson joined the Zoom meeting.
Motion by Mayor Joseph C. Winfield, seconded by Councilmember Joyce Jones-Ivey to amend the
agenda by changing the agenda order as follows: Regular Agenda item #1 would be moved to item #3,
item #2 would be moved to item #5, item #3 would be moved to item #4, item #4 would be moved to item
#6, item # 5 would be moved to item #1, item # 6 would be moved to item #2 and item #'s 7 and 8
would remain as posted.
Vote: 7 - 0 Carried
Mayor Winfield continued providing guildelines for participation in the Town Council's Regular Session
Zoom meeting.
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
There were no informational items.
CALL TO AUDIENCE
No comments were received.
PRESENTATIONS
1.Proclamation - United States Army's 245th Birthday
Mayor Winfield proclaimed June 14, 2020 to be the United States Army's 245th Birthday and expressed
appreciation on behalf of the people of the Town of Oro Valley, to the United States Army and the
dedicated soldiers who have served in it over the 245 years it has been in existence.
The proclamation was accepted by Captain Joseph Boland of the United States Army.
CONSENT AGENDA
A.Minutes - May 20, 2020
Motion by Mayor Joseph C. Winfield, seconded by Councilmember Joyce Jones-Ivey to approve consent
agenda item (A).
Vote: 7 - 0 Carried
6/3/20 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 2
REGULAR AGENDA (Items reflect the re-organized order as passed in the motion above)
1.DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE DIRECTION TO THE TOWN MANAGER TO FACILITATE, WITH
ROMPSEN'S KNOWLEDGE AND CONSENT, COMMUNICATIONS WITH THIRD PARTIES ABOUT
POSSIBLE OPTIONS FOR ITS ORO VALLEY PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE FORMER
VISTOSO GOLF COURSE
Motion by Vice-Mayor Melanie Barrett, seconded by Mayor Joseph C. Winfield to direct the Town
Manager to work with The Conservation Fund and Romspen on the potential preservation of the open
space that was formerly the Vistoso golf course, and to work with The Conservation Fund to help identify
possible funding, including grant funding, to acquire the property for a green space to be gifted to the Town.
Vice Mayor Barrett clarified the reason for requesting agenda item #1.
The following individuals spoke in support of item #1.
Oro Valley resident Rosa Dailey
Oro Valley resident Michael Bilodeau
Oro Valley resident Tom Stegman
Oro Valley resident Richard Molnar
Oro Valley resident Sarah Nelson
Oro Valley resident Bruce Baier
Mayor Winfield made a motion to go into Executive Session regarding item #1. No second was received.
Motion Failed.
The following individuals continued to speak on item #1.
Oro Valley resident Roy Hoff
Oro Valley Gayle Mateer
Oro Valley resident David Chanover
Oro Valley resident Anita Roger-Fields
Oro Valley resident Bill Garner
Oro Valley resident Eileen Itrheim
Oro Valley resident Ken Brown
Oro Valley residents Gordon and Anita Parkhill
Oro Valley resident Patricia Sturmon
Oro Valley resident Bill Sugars
Oro Valley resident John Medlen
Oro Valley resident Cyndy Wicker
Discussion ensued amongst Council and staff regarding item #1.
Town Clerk Mike Standish repeated the current motion on the table.
Discussion continued amongst Council and staff regarding item #1.
Motion by Councilmember Steve Solomon, seconded by Councilmember Bill Rodman to amend the main
motion and request the Town Manager to facilitate, with all vested parties, all possible options for
preserving the Vistoso Golf Course.
Discussion continued amongst Council and staff regarding the amended motion.
Councilmember Solomon withdrew his amendment to the main motion. Councilmember Rodman
withdrew his second.
6/3/20 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 3
Motion by Mayor Joseph C. Winfield, seconded by Vice-Mayor Melanie Barrett to direct the Town
Manager to work with The Conservation Fund and Romspen on the potential preservation of the open
space that was formerly the Vistoso golf course, and to work with The Conservation Fund to help identify
possible funding, including grant funding, to acquire the property for a green space to be gifted to the Town.
Vote: 7 - 0 Carried
Mayor Winfield recessed the meeting at 8:20 p.m
Mayor Winfield reconvened the meeting at 8:30 p.m.
2.UPDATE AND INFORMATIONAL DISCUSSION REGARDING THE CLOSED VISTOSO GOLF COURSE
Councilmember Solomon provided an overview of item #2 and requested the item be removed as a result
of the previous motion and discussion provided during item #1.
3.DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING A MASTER SIGN PROGRAM FOR THE
PROPERTY KNOWN AS TWO ORACLE PLACE, LOCATED AT 7315 N. ORACLE ROAD
Senior Planning Technician Patty Hayes presented item #3 and included the following:
Purpose
Subject property
Existing Signs
Master Sign Program
Monument and Entryway Sign Locations
Entryway Signs
Monument Sign - Existing
New Monument Sign
Wall Signs
General Plan
Summary
Property owner Melissa Lal continued the presentation regarding Two Oracle Place and included the
following;
Two Oracle Place
Existing Conditions
Planned Exterior Remodel
Keri Silvyn of the Law Offices of Lazarus & Silvyn, P.C continued the presentation and included the
following;
Current Aerial
Unique Building
Goals of Sign Program
Monument South Entrance
Monument North Entrance (Two Options)
Entryway Signage
Wall Signs
Under Canopy Signs
CSP Modifications
Discussion ensued amongst Council and staff regarding the Master Sign Program for Two Oracle Place.
6/3/20 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 4
Motion by Councilmember Bill Rodman, seconded by Councilmember Joyce Jones-Ivey to approve the
master sign program, in Attachment 1, for Two Oracle Place based on the finding that the proposed sign
program is consistent with the Design Principles.
Discussion continued amongst Council and staff regarding item #3.
Motion by Councilmember Bill Rodman, seconded by Councilmember Joyce Jones-Ivey to approve the
master sign program, in Attachment 1, for Two Oracle Place based on the finding that the proposed sign
program is consistent with the Design Principles.
Vote: 6 - 0 Carried
Councilmember Nicolson was absent from the vote.
4.DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING PROPOSED GRAZING IN A PORTION OF
STONE CANYON NEIGHBORHOOD 7, LOCATED NORTH OF TORTOLITA MOUNTAIN CIRCLE
ABUTTING THE TOWN'S BOUNDARIES
A. PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE NO. (O)20-03, A TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE RANCHO VISTOSO
PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT TO ALLOW REQUESTS FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS FOR
FARMS AND RANCHES IN THE LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT
B. PUBLIC HEARING: RESOLUTION NO. (R)20-27, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ALLOWING
GRAZING IN A PORTION OF STONE CANYON NEIGHBORHOOD 7, LOCATED NORTH OF
TORTOLITA MOUNTAIN CIRCLE ABUTTING THE TOWN'S BOUNDARIES
Senior Principal Planner Milini Simms presented item #4 and included the following:
Purpose
Subject Area
Site History
Existing Zoning Standards
Item A: Text Amendment to the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Dev.
Item B: Conditional Use Permit for grazing in part of Stone Canyon
Item B: Mitigation measures
Planning and Zoning Commission
General Plan Conformance
Summary and Recommendation
Paul Oland of Paradigm Land Design LLC., continued the presentation and included the following:
Martin Grazing Leases
Existing Grazing Limits (Fence Lines + Impassable Terrain)
Summary
Mayor Winfield opened the public hearing.
The following individual spoke on item #4.
Oro Valley resident Michael Staab
Mayor Winfield closed the public hearing.
Motion by Mayor Joseph C. Winfield, seconded by Councilmember Steve Solomon to approve
6/3/20 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 5
Motion by Mayor Joseph C. Winfield, seconded by Councilmember Steve Solomon to approve
Ordinance No. (O)20-03, a text amendment to the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development to add
farms and ranches as conditional uses to the Low Density Residential zoning district based on the finding it
is in conformance with the General Plan.
Discussion ensued amongst Council and staff regarding item #4a.
Motion by Mayor Joseph C. Winfield, seconded by Councilmember Steve Solomon Ordinance No.
(O)20-03, a text amendment to the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development to add farms and ranches
as conditional uses to the Low Density Residential zoning district based on the finding it is in conformance
with the General Plan.
Vote: 5 - 1 Carried
OPPOSED: Councilmember Joyce Jones-Ivey
Councilmember Nicolson was absent from the vote
Motion by Councilmember Bill Rodman, seconded by Councilmember Steve Solomon to approve
Resolution No. (R)20-27 for a conditional use permit allowing grazing in a portion of Stone Canyon
Neighborhood 7, as depicted and subject to the conditions in Attachment 1, based on the finding it is in
conformance with the Conditional Use Permit criteria in the Zoning Code and subject to the condition that
the number of allowed cows be changed to six (6).
Vote: 5 - 1 Carried
OPPOSED: Councilmember Joyce Jones-Ivey
Councilmember Nicolson was absent from the vote.
5.PUBLIC HEARING: RESOLUTION NO. (R)20-26, AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING A DECREASE TO
THE RECLAIMED WATER COMMODITY RATE AND A DECREASE TO THE RECLAIMED WATER
GROUNDWATER PRESERVATION FEE FOR THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY
Water Utility Director Peter Abraham presented the FY 2020/21 Water Utility Rates and included the
following:
The Oro Valley Water Utility
Water rate setting goals & analysis assumptions
2020 Water rate analysis - Potable water
2020 Water rate analysis - Reclaimed water
2020 Water rate staff recommendation
Mayor Winfield opened the public hearing
No comments were received.
Mayor Winfield closed the public hearing.
Motion by Councilmember Bill Rodman, seconded by Councilmember Joyce Jones-Ivey to approve
Resolution No. (R)20-26, authorizing and approving a decrease to the reclaimed commodity rate and a
decrease to the reclaimed Groundwater Preservation Fee for the Town of Oro Valley Water Utility.
Discussion ensued amongst Council and staff regarding item #5.
6/3/20 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 6
Motion by Mayor Joseph C. Winfield, seconded by Vice-Mayor Melanie Barrett to amend the motion to
approve Resolution No. (R)20-26, authorizing and approving a decrease to the reclaimed commodity rate
and to retain the Groundwater Preservation Fee of $.47 cents for the Town of Oro Valley Water Utility and
to revisit the policy for any possible updates regarding the reclaimed ground water preservation fee.
Discussion continued amongst Council and staff regarding item #5.
Motion by Mayor Joseph C. Winfield, seconded by Vice-Mayor Melanie Barrett to amend the motion to
approve Resolution No. (R)20-26, authorizing and approving a decrease to the reclaimed commodity rate
and to retain the Groundwater Preservation Fee of $.47 cents for the Town of Oro Valley Water Utility and
to revisit the policy for any possible updates regarding the reclaimed Groundwater Preservation fee.
Vote: 7 - 0 Carried
Motion by Mayor Joseph C. Winfield, seconded by Vice-Mayor Melanie Barrett to adopt the amended
motion as approved.
Vote: 7 - 0 Carried
6.DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING RESOLUTION NO. (R)20-25, SUPPORTING THE
NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES (NLC) CITIES ARE ESSENTIAL TO AMERICA'S ECONOMIC
RECOVERY CAMPAIGN
Motion by Councilmember Bill Rodman, seconded by Councilmember Rhonda Piña to
approve Resolution No. (R)20-25, supporting the National League of Cities (NLC) cities are essential to
America's economic recovery campaign.
Vote: 7 - 0 Carried
7.DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ABOUT THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY'S CURRENT
EMERGENCY PROCLAMATION AND/OR AMENDMENTS THERETO CONSIDERING GOVERNOR
DUCEY'S 5/12/20 EXECUTIVE ORDER 2020-36 (AKA "STAY HEALTHY, RETURN SMARTER, RETURN
STRONGER") AND/OR PIMA COUNTY'S 5/21/20 EMERGENCY PROCLAMATION
Motion by Councilmember Rhonda Piña, seconded by Councilmember Bill Rodman to continue agenda
items #7 and #8 to the June 17th, 2020 Regular Session.
Motion by Councilmember Rhonda Piña, seconded by Councilmember Bill Rodman to amend the main
motion by continuing agenda items #7 and #8 to the June 10th, 2020 Budget Study Session and Special
Session meeting.
Vote: 4 - 3 Carried
OPPOSED: Mayor Joseph C. Winfield
Vice-Mayor Melanie Barrett
Councilmember Josh Nicolson
8.DISCUSSION ABOUT TOWN COUNCIL INPUT ON FUTURE AMENDMENTS, IF ANY, TO THE TOWN
OF ORO VALLEY'S CURRENT EMERGENCY PROCLAMATION
Agenda item #8 was moved to the June 10th, 2020 Budget Study and Special Session per the previously
passed amended motion.
FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
No future agenda items were requested.
6/3/20 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 7
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Mayor Joseph C. Winfield, seconded by Councilmember Joyce Jones-Ivey to adjourn the
meeting at 11:08 p.m.
Vote: 7 - 0 Carried
_________________________________
Michelle Stine, MMC
Deputy Town Clerk
I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the regular session
of the Town of Oro Valley Council of Oro Valley, Arizona held on the 3rd day of June 2020. I further certify that
the meeting was duly called and held and that a quorum was present.
Dated this _____ day of ____________________, 2020.
___________________________
Michael Standish, CMC
Town Clerk
6/3/20 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 8
D R A F T
AGENDA
ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL
BUDGET STUDY SESSION AND SPECIAL SESSION
June 10, 2020
ONLINE ZOOM MEETING
SPECIAL SESSION AT OR AFTER 5:30 PM
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Winfield called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Present: Joseph C. Winfield, Mayor
Melanie Barrett, Vice Mayor
Rhonda Piña, Councilmember
Bill Rodman, Councilmember
Steve Solomon, Councilmember
Absent:Joyce Jones-Ivey, Councilmember
Josh Nicolson, Councilmember
EXECUTIVE SESSION - Pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.03 (A)(3) and (A)(4) about Town Golf Operations and
Agreements related to those operations with Canada Hills Home Owner's Association and/or Villages Home
Owner's Association
Mayor Winfield announced that the following staff members would be joining Council in Executive
Session: Legal Services Director Tobin Sidles, Town Attorney Gary Cohen, Town Manager Mary Jacobs,
Assistant Town Manager Chris Cornelison and Town Clerk Mike Standish.
Motion by Mayor Joseph C. Winfield, seconded by Councilmember Steve Solomon to go into Executive
Session at 5:32 p.m. Pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.03 (A)(3) and (A)(4) about Town Golf Operations and
Agreements related to those operations with Canada Hills Home Owner's Association and/or Villages
Home Owner's Association.
Vote: 5 - 0 Carried
Councilmember Jones-Ivey and Councilmember Nicolson absent from the vote.
Councilmember Jones-Ivey joined the meeting before going into Executive Session.
ADJOURNMENT OF THE SPECIAL SESSION
Motion by Mayor Joseph C. Winfield, seconded by Vice Mayor Melanie Barrett to adjourn the Special
Session at 6:11 p.m.
Vote: 6 - 0 Carried
6/10/20 Minutes, Town Council Budget Study and Special Session 1
Councilmember Nicolson was absent.
BUDGET STUDY SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Winfield called the Budget Study Session to order at 6:13 p.m.
Mayor Winfield provided the guidelines for participation in the Town Council's Budget Study Session and
Special Session Zoom meeting.
ROLL CALL
Present:Joseph C. Winfield, Mayor
Melanie Barrett, Vice Mayor
Rhonda Piña, Councilmember
Bill Rodman, Councilmember
Steve Solomon, Councilmember
Joyce Jones-Ivey, Councilmember
Absent:Josh Nicolson, Councilmember
BUDGET STUDY SESSION AGENDA
1.PRESENTATION AND POSSIBLE DISCUSSION OF THE TOWN'S FISCAL YEAR 2019/20 FINANCIAL
UPDATE THROUGH APRIL 2020
Finance and Budget Administrator Wendy Gomez presented the Fiscal Year 19/20 Financial Update
through April 2020 and included the following:
General Fund Revenues
General Fund Expenditures
General Fund
Highway Fund
Community Center Fund
Discussion ensued amongst Council and staff regarding Budget Study Session item #1.
2.PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION OF THE FY 2020/21 TOWN MANAGER'S RECOMMENDED
BUDGET
Town Manager Mary Jacobs provided a brief summary regarding the presentations of the Fiscal Year
20/21 Town Manager's Recommended Budget.
Community Center Fund
Parks and Recreation Director Kristy Diaz-Trahan presented the proposed Community Center Fund
budget and included the following:
Community Center Fund
Community Center
Antares Golf
Tony Marino, with Antares Golf, continued the presentation and provided an overview of Antares Golf that
6/10/20 Minutes, Town Council Budget Study and Special Session 2
Tony Marino, with Antares Golf, continued the presentation and provided an overview of Antares Golf that
included the following:
History of Antares Golf (formerly known as Billy Casper Golf)
Transition plan and transition team
First year goals
Golf Management Services
Questions
Discussion ensued amongst Council, staff and Mr. Marino.
CARES ACT REIMBURSEMENT
Town Manager Mary Jacobs presented the following information regarding possible CARES Act
reimbursement to the Town of Oro Valley;
Cares Act Reimbursement
Discussion ensued amongst Council and Ms. Jacobs regarding Cares Act reimbursement.
Ms. Jacobs continued the presentation and included the following:
Proposed Allocation Strategy
Business Support ($1M)
Town Services and Continuity of Operations ($1.3M)
Future Resurgence ($1M)
Town Council Strategic Priorities ($1M)
Additional Contingency ($1M)
Discussion continued amongst Council and staff regarding the possible CARES Act reimbursement.
ADJOURNMENT OF THE BUDGET STUDY SESSION
Mayor Winfield adjourned the Budget Study Session at 8:37 p.m.
Mayor Winfield recessed the meeting at 8:38 p.m.
Mayor Winfield reconvened the meeting at 8:48 p.m.
RECONVENE THE SPECIAL SESSION
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Winfield called the Special Session to order at 8:48 p.m.
SPECIAL SESSION AGENDA
1.DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ABOUT THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY'S CURRENT
EMERGENCY PROCLAMATION AND/OR AMENDMENTS THERETO CONSIDERING GOVERNOR
DUCEY'S 5/12/20 EXECUTIVE ORDER 2020-36 (AKA "STAY HEALTHY, RETURN SMARTER, RETURN
STRONGER") AND/OR PIMA COUNTY'S 5/21/20 EMERGENCY PROCLAMATION
Councilmember Piña requested clarification regarding the differences between the Governor's
6/10/20 Minutes, Town Council Budget Study and Special Session 3
Councilmember Piña requested clarification regarding the differences between the Governor's
Proclamation and the Town of Oro Valley Mayor's Proclamation.
Town Attorney Gary Cohen provided clarification regarding the differences between the proclamations.
Discussion ensued amongst Council and staff regarding Special Session Agenda item #1.
2.DISCUSSION ABOUT TOWN COUNCIL INPUT ON FUTURE AMENDMENTS, IF ANY, TO THE TOWN
OF ORO VALLEY'S CURRENT EMERGENCY PROCLAMATION
Councilmember Rodman and Councilmember Piña asked for clarification regarding Council's input
on future amendments, if any, to the Town of Oro Valley's current Emergency Proclamation could be
addressed.
Discussion ensued amongst Council and staff regarding input on future amendments, if any, to the Town
of Oro Valley's current Emergency Proclamation.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Mayor Joseph C. Winfield, seconded by Councilmember Joyce Jones-Ivey to adjourn the
meeting at 9:04 p.m.
Vote: 6 - 0 Carried
Councilmember Nicolson was absent.
______________________________
Michelle Stine, MMC
Deputy Town Clerk
I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the budget study session and
special session of the Town of Oro Valley Council of Oro Valley, Arizona held on the 10th day of June 2020. I further
certify that the meeting was duly called and held and that a quorum was present.
Dated this _____ day of ____________________, 2020.
___________________________
Michael Standish, CMC
Town Clerk
6/10/20 Minutes, Town Council Budget Study and Special Session 4
D R A F T
MINUTES
ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL
REGULAR SESSION
JUNE 17, 2020
ONLINE ZOOM MEETING
REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Winfield called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Present: Joseph C. Winfield, Mayor
Melanie Barrett, Vice-Mayor
Rhonda Piña, Councilmember
Bill Rodman, Councilmember
Steve Solomon, Councilmember
Absent: Joyce Jones-Ivey, Councilmember
Josh Nicolson, Councilmember
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Councilmember Piña recited the Pledge of Allegiance.
UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS
Town Clerk Mike Standish announced the upcoming Town meetings.
COUNCIL REPORTS
Vice Mayor Barrett reported that Council had been working closely with staff to stay informed with local
and national events. Vice Mayor Barrett also expressed her appreciation to first responders.
Councilmember Jones-Ivey joined the Zoom meeting
TOWN MANAGER'S REPORT
Town Manager Mary Jacobs reported on the death of George Floyd and said that local government
officials had the obligation to treat members of the community and those within our organization, fairly
and equitably.
Councilmember Nicolson joined the Zoom meeting.
Oro Valley Police Chief Kara Riley provided an overview of recent police reform measures and how the
6/17/20 Minutes, Oro Valley Town Council Regular Session 1
Oro Valley Police Department complied with these measures. Chief Riley also thanked firefighters for
their service and assistance in dealing with the Big Horn fire.
Town Manager Mary Jacobs continued the Town Manager's Report and included the following:
Update on COVID-19 precautions
Overview of Proposition 480
Recognized and expressed appreciation to the first responders dealing with the Big Horn Fire
Public information outreach efforts regarding possible flooding as a result of the Big Horn Fire
ORDER OF BUSINESS
Mayor Winfield reviewed the order of business and stated that the order would stand as posted.
Mayor Winfield provided the guidelines for participation in the Town Council's Regular Session Zoom
meeting.
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
There were no Informational Items.
CALL TO AUDIENCE
No comments were received.
PRESENTATIONS
There were no presentations.
CONSENT AGENDA
A.Minutes - May 22, May 27, and May 28, 2020
B.Request for approval of a Final Plat Amendment to remove a portion of the no access easement along the
south side of Tortolita Mountain Circle in Stone Canyon Neighborhood II
C.Resolution No. (R)20-28, authorizing and approving an intergovernmental agreement between the Town
of Oro Valley and Pima County regarding payment for the incarceration of municipal prisoners
Motion by Mayor Joseph C. Winfield, seconded by Councilmember Bill Rodman to approve Consent
agenda items (A) - (C).
Vote: 7 - 0 Carried
REGULAR AGENDA
1.PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE NO. (O)20-04, AMENDING THE ORO VALLEY TOWN
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES BY REPEALING AND REPLACING WITH NEW FEES AS PROVIDED
IN EXHIBIT "A"
Strategic Initiatives Manager Amanda Jacobs presented item #1 and included the following:
6/17/20 Minutes, Oro Valley Town Council Regular Session 2
Strategic Initiatives Manager Amanda Jacobs presented item #1 and included the following:
Purpose
Impact Fee Process
Proposed Development Impact Fees
Arizona Fee Comparison
Non-Residential Fee Comparison
Key State Law Requirements
Options
Grandfathering Fee Provisions
Grandfathering Project Examples
Questions
Mayor Winfield opened the public hearing.
The following individuals spoke regarding item #1.
Oro Valley resident and President and CEO of the Greater Oro Valley Chamber of Commerce Dave Perry
Oro Valley resident Timothy Bohen
Mayor Winfield closed the public hearing.
Discussion ensued amongst Council and staff regarding the proposed Development Impact Fees.
Motion by Councilmember Steve Solomon, seconded by Councilmember Bill
Rodman to approve Ordinance No. (O)20-04, amending the Oro Valley Town Development Impact Fees
by repealing and replacing with the new development impact fees as provided in "Exhibit A," and repealing
all resolutions, ordinances and rules of the Town of Oro Valley in conflict therewith, effective July 1, 2022
due to the uncertainties of the current environment with the COVID-19 pandemic.
Discussion continued amongst Council and staff regarding item #1.
Motion by Vice-Mayor Melanie Barrett, seconded by Councilmember Josh Nicolson to deny Ordinance
No. (O)20-04, amending the Oro Valley Town Development Impact Fees as provided in "Exhibit A."
Discussion continued amongst Council and staff regarding item #1.
Councilmember Solomon accepted the amendment to the main motion, Councilmember
Rodman denied the amendment.
Motion by Vice-Mayor Melanie Barrett, seconded by Councilmember Josh Nicolson to deny Ordinance
No. (O)20-04, amending the Oro Valley Town Development Impact Fees as provided in "Exhibit A."
Vote: 2 - 5 Failed
OPPOSED: Mayor Joseph C. Winfield
Councilmember Joyce Jones-Ivey
Councilmember Rhonda Piña
Councilmember Bill Rodman
Councilmember Steve Solomon
Motion by Councilmember Steve Solomon, seconded by Councilmember Bill Rodman to
6/17/20 Minutes, Oro Valley Town Council Regular Session 3
Motion by Councilmember Steve Solomon, seconded by Councilmember Bill Rodman to
approve Ordinance No. (O)20-04, amending the Oro Valley Town Development Impact Fees by repealing
and replacing with the new development impact fees as provided in "Exhibit A," and repealing all
resolutions, ordinances and rules of the Town of Oro Valley in conflict therewith, effective July 1, 2022 due
to the uncertainties of the current environment with the COVID-19 pandemic.
Vote: 7 - 0 Carried
Mayor Winfield recessed the meeting at 7:55 p.m.
Mayor Winfield reconvened the meeting at 8:05 p.m.
2.PUBLIC HEARING: RESOLUTION NO. (R)20-31, ADOPTION OF THE TENTATIVE BUDGET FOR FY
2020/21 AND SETTING THE LOCAL ALTERNATIVE EXPENDITURE LIMITATION FOR FY 2020/21
Town Manager Mary Jacobs gave a brief overview of item #2 and introduced Chief Financial Officer
David Gephart.
Mr. Gephart presented item #2 and included the following:
FY20/21 Tentative Budget
FY 20/21 Tentative Budget by Fund
FY 20/21 Revenue Sources - $105.4M
FY 20/21 Expenditure Categories - $105.4M
FY 20/21 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
FY 20/21 General Fund Overview
Final Notes and Next Steps
Mayor Winfield opened the public hearing.
No comments were received.
Mayor Winfield closed the public hearing.
Discussion ensued amongst Council and staff regarding the adoption of the tentative budget for FY
2020/21 and setting the Local Alternative Expenditure Limitation for FY 2020/21.
Motion by Mayor Joseph C. Winfield, seconded by Councilmember Bill Rodman to approve Resolution
No. (R)20-31, adopting the Tentative Budget for Fiscal Year 2020/21, and setting the local alternative
expenditure limitation for Fiscal Year 2020/21 at $105,435,626.
Vote: 7 - 0 Carried
3.RESOLUTION NO. (R)20-29, DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING ADOPTING THE
PUBLIC SAFETY PERSONNEL RETIREMENT SYSTEM (PSPRS) PENSION FUNDING POLICY AND
ACCEPTING THE TOWN'S SHARE OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES UNDER THE PSPRS ACTUARIAL
VALUATION REPORT
Chief Financial Officer David Gephart presented item #3 and included the following:
Overview - Pension Funding Policy
Plan Financial Position - June 30, 2019
Oro Valley Police
Summary report - Contribution Rate - Page 2
Summary report - Funded status - Page 2
Contribution Requirements 2019 (Police Pension) Page 4 of report
6/17/20 Minutes, Oro Valley Town Council Regular Session 4
Asset Support - Page 14
Impact of additional contributions - page 8
PSPRS Police Employer Cost by Year
Discussion ensued amongst Council and staff regarding item #3.
Motion by Mayor Joseph C. Winfield, seconded by Councilmember Joyce Jones-Ivey to approve
Resolution No. (R)20-29, adopting the Public Safety Personnel Retirement System (PSPRS) Pension
Funding Policy and accepting the Town's share of assets and liabilities under the PSPRS actuarial
valuation report.
Vote: 7 - 0 Carried
4.RESOLUTION NO. (R)20-30, AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE TOWN
FINANCIAL AND BUDGETARY POLICIES TO COMPLY WITH GOVERNMENTAL ACCOUNTING
STANDARDS BOARD STATEMENT NO.54, COMMITTING THE ENDING FUND BALANCE FOR
CERTAIN SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES, AND AUTHORIZING THE TOWN
MANAGER OR A DESIGNEE TO ASSIGN FUND BALANCE TO A SPECIFIC PURPOSE
Chief Financial Officer David Gephart gave an overview of item #4.
Discussion ensued amongst Council and staff regarding item #4.
Motion by Mayor Joseph C. Winfield, seconded by Councilmember Rhonda Piña to approve Resolution
No. (R)20-30, amending the Town Financial and Budgetary Policies to comply with Governmental
Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 54, committing the ending fund balance for certain Special
Revenue Funds for specific purposes, and authorizing the Town Manager or a designee to assign fund
balance to a specific purpose.
Vote: 7 - 0 Carried
FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
No future agenda items were requested.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Mayor Joseph C. Winfield, seconded by Councilmember Joyce Jones-Ivey to adjourn the
meeting at 9:51 p.m.
Vote: 7 - 0 Carried
________________________________
Michelle Stine, MMC
Deputy Town Clerk
I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the regular session
of the Town of Oro Valley Council of Oro Valley, Arizona held on the 17th day of June 2020. I further certify that
the meeting was duly called and held and that a quorum was present.
Dated this _____ day of ____________________, 2020.
6/17/20 Minutes, Oro Valley Town Council Regular Session 5
___________________________
Michael Standish, CMC
Town Clerk
6/17/20 Minutes, Oro Valley Town Council Regular Session 6
Town Council Regular and Study Session B.
Meeting Date:07/01/2020
Requested by: George Dunscomb Submitted By:Suzanne Wentzel, Magistrate Court
Department:Magistrate Court
SUBJECT:
Resolution No. (R)20-32, authorizing and approving an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) between the Town of
Oro Valley and the Pima County Jail to provide officer coverage and access to a video link at the jail for video
proceedings between the jail and the Court
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the IGA between the Town and the Pima County Sheriffs' Department for Jail staff to
move Oro Valley prisoners to and from their cells to the video court room.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
This IGA is a renewal of the IGA approved previously by resolution No. (R)20-16, which expires July 1, 2020. The
IGA allows the Magistrate Court to access the video system at the jail, reserves a specified time for those hearings
one time each week, and provides for jail officers to be present to move the Oro Valley prisoners from their cells to
the video courtroom, watch them during the hearing,
give them their paperwork and move them back to their cells.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
The Town of Oro Valley previously entered into an IGA with Pima County to provide video conferencing capabilities
between the Pima County Jail Court Room and the Oro Valley Magistrate Court Room. The video equipment has
been purchased and should be operational in the very near future.
Video conferencing reduces costs to the Town by allowing the Court to conduct hearings with in custody defendants
without having to physically load them into a van and drive them to the Town Court facility. It saves money on
security costs and gasoline, and it reduces risk to all involved. The attached IGA between the Town of Oro Valley
and Pima County sets out the terms of the Town’s use of the jail facility and staff to conduct the in-custody
hearings.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The IGA provides that the County Jail will provide one officer, at $33 for one hour each week, 52 weeks per year, for
a
total projected expense of $1,731 per year. The Magistrate Court had been utilizing Arizona Rangers to conduct
transports, one time each week at a cost of $200 per court session for two officers, at a projected annual cost of
$10,400. Additionally, there are savings in the costs of the gasoline and upkeep of the transport van.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to APPROVE Resolution No. (R)20-32, approving the IGA between the Town of Oro Valley and
Pima County for the use of video equipment and personnel at the jail for video court proceedings.
Attachments
(R)20-32 Resolution IGA Video Court Hearings
IGA Video Court
RESOLUTION NO. (R)20-32
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, APPROVING AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL
AGREEMENT BETWEEN PIMA COUNTY, AND THE TOWN OF ORO
VALLEY FOR THE PROVISION OF VIDEO COURT HEARINGS OF
MUNICIPAL PRISONERS ; AN D DIRECTING THE TOWN MANAGER,
TOWN CLERK, TOWN LEGAL SERVICES DIRECTOR, OR THEIR DULY
AUTHORIZED OFFICERS AND AGENTS TO TAKE ALL STEPS
NECESSARY TO CARRY OUT THE PURPOSES AND INTENT OF THIS
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, pursuant to A.R.S. § 11 -952, et. seq., the C ounty and municipal corporation
participating jurisdictions may contract for services and enter into agreements with one another for
joint or cooperative action; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Oro Valley desires to enter into the Intergovernmental Agreement
(“IGA”) with Pima County for the provision of video court hearings of municipal prisoners; and
WHEREAS, the Pima County Sheriff’s Department Corrections Bureau shall provide the Town of
Oro Valley’s Magistrate Court with a video court session between Oro Valley Magistrate Court and
the Pima County Adult Detention Center; and
WHEREAS, each video court session will be held weekly on Thursdays at 0830 hours for a period
of one hour, unless a different schedule is otherwise agreed to by both parties ; and
WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the Town to enter into the Intergovernmental Agreement,
attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference, for the provision of video
court hearings of municipal prisoners; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL OF
THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA AS FOLLOWS:
1. That the Intergovernmental Agreement between Pima County and the Town of Oro
Valley, attached hereto as Exhibit “A” is hereby approved.
2. That the Town Magistrate of the Town of Oro Valley and other administrative officials
are hereby authorized to take such steps as necessary to execute and implement the terms
of the Intergovernmental Agreement.
3. The Town Manager, Town Clerk, Town Legal Services Director, or their duly
authorized officers and agents are hereby authorized and directed to take all steps
necessary to carry out the purposes and intent of this resolution.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona,
this 1st day of July, 2020.
2
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA
_______________________________
Joseph C. Winfield, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM :
Michael Standish, Town Clerk Tobin Sidles, Legal Services Director
Date: Date:
3
EXHIBIT “A”
1
INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
AND
PIMA COUNTY
FOR
PROVISION OF VIDEO -COURT HEARINGS OF MUNICIPAL INMATES
THIS INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT (IGA), is entered into pursuant to ARS §
11-952 (as amended) by and between:
THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, a municipal corporation, (hereinafter sometimes referred to as
the “Town”); and
THE COUNTY OF PIMA, a body politic and corporate, a political subdivision of the State of
Arizona, (hereinafter sometimes referred to as the “County”).
WHEREAS the Parties desire to enter into an agreement to provide video -court hearings for
municipal inmates; and
WHEREAS the Town and County may contract for services and enter into agreements with
one another for joint or cooperative action pursuant to A.R.S. § 11-952, et seq.; and
WHEREAS the provision of video-court hearings for m unicipal inmates will be in the best
interests of the Parties and the citizens of Pima County.
NOW THEREFORE, The Town and County hereby agree as follows :
Agreement
1. Purpose. The purpose of this IGA is to set forth the terms and conditions for the Pima County
Sheriff’s Department Corrections Bureau to provide the Town of Oro Valley’s Municipal Court
with a video court session between Oro Valley Municipal Court (OVMC) and the Pima County
Adult Detention Complex (PCADC).
2. Obligations of the Parties. PCADC will be responsible for pulling OVMC’s inmate files and
preparing them for court, preparing their inmates for court, providing security in the courtroom,
providing clerical support for court documentation and faxing required documentation back to
OVMC.
OVMC shall fax PCADC’s Records Unit appropriate documentation on each OVMC defendant
prior to the defendant leaving the video court session.
Each video court session will be weekly on Thursdays, beginning at 0830 hours. This session
both Town and County agree that this schedule may be changed based on either party’s need
for more video court time, or based on other factors that could require a different schedule.
2
OVMC shall complete the video court session no later than 0930 hours. Any hearing extending
past 0930 hours shall be continued at a later date.
Town will pay for one weekly hour of video court which will cover the cost of one Corrections
Officer for one hour for security. The current salary rate for these employees is:
Corrections Officer (1 hour) $32.53
Total for one hour: $32.53
“Town of Oro Valley inmate” shall mean any person who has been incarcerated as a result of a
charge pending in the Town of Oro Valley Municipal Court, as a result of an agreement between
the Town of Oro Valley and another jurisdiction to allow the person to serve his/her sentence
locally, or has been sentenced pursuant to an order of the Town of Oro Valley Municipal Court
and for whom the Town of Oro Valley has the legal obligation to provide or pay for prisoner
housing (this Agreement does not create such an obligation, that obligat ion exists under current
Arizona Law). A prisoner arrested by the Town of Oro Valley Police Department solely on
another governmental entity warrant is not a Town of Oro Valley prisoner.
Criteria and Rules Governing Billing:
a. A “billable video-court session” is defined as that period commencing at 0830 hours and
ending at 0930 hours each Thursday, or any fractional part thereof.
b. Should a “billable video-court session” not occur in any given week, the Town will not be
billed that week.
c . The Town will be billed monthly for these services. Invoicing for these services will be
separate from the monthly incarceration billing invoice and must be paid separately.
Criteria for Assessment of Billing:
a. The costs of a “billable video-court session” shall be based on the current rates of salary
each involved class of employee currently earns. These rates are subject to increase as
wages increase for the classification.
b. County will give Town a thirty (30) day notice of any sala ry rate increase and Town will
be billed accordingly.
County will submit a statement of Town video-court session charges on a monthly basis. This
statement shall provide information in chronological order as follows: billing period, dates of
video court sessions, weekly costs of individual employees, weekly totals, and the monthly total
bill.
Any individual video court session charge contested shall be made known to the County within
30 days after receipt of the monthly billing. If the Town notifies the County of a dispute within
30 days of receipt of the monthly billing, the Town may withhold payment on those specific video
court sessions for which billing is disputed until the disput e has been resolved. No dispute will
be accepted if not made within 30 days after the receipt on the monthly billing. Disputes about
the billing statement shall be jointly reviewed by both parties and satisfactorily resolved within 45
days of the monthly billing. All charges shall be paid within sixty days of receipt of the monthly
billing, excluding contested charges. Contested charges shall be paid within 30 days of
3
resolution of the dispute. Charges remaining unresolved after the 60-day period may be
arbitrated by a mutually acceptable third party. Town agrees to pay interest on outstanding
charges beginning on the 10th day after resolution of the billing at a rate of 10% per annum until
paid. Town agrees that when a check is sent to County in paym ent of previously disputed
charge, Town will attach an invoice detailing what specific charges are being paid. Town
agrees that when funds are withheld due to a disputed charge, the specific charge being
disputed, and the amount of payment being withheld, will be specified on an invoice attached to
the payment check for the period in which the charge disputed was included. Town agrees to
attach to each check submitted to County an invoice indicating the dates for which that check is
to be applied.
3. Term. This IGA shall be in effect from July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021. This IGA may be
extended for four (4) additional one (1) year periods or any portion thereof. Any extension shall
be by written amendment executed by the governing bodies of the parties.
4. Costs. Neither party shall be obliged to the other party for any costs incurred pursuant to this
IGA, except as herein provided.
5. Jurisdiction. Nothing in this IGA shall be construed as either limiting or extending the statutory
jurisdiction of either of the parties.
6. Indemnification. To the extent permitted by law, each party agrees to indemnify, defend and
save harmless the other, their appointed boards and commissions, officia ls, employees and
insurance carriers, individually and collectively from all losses, claims, suits, demands,
expenses, subrogation, attorney’s fees or actions of any kind resulting from all personal injury
including bodily injury and death, and property damage occasioned during the term of this
Agreement for acts or omissions of such party, its agents, officials, and employees.
7. Insurance. Each party shall obtain and maintain at its own expense, for the duration of this
IGA, the following type(s) and amounts of insurance:
a) Commercial General Liability in the amount of $1,000,000.00 combined single limit Bodily
Injury and Property Damage.
b) Commercial or Business automobile liability coverage for owned, non -owned and hired
vehicles used in the performance of this IGA with limits in the amount of $1,000,000.00
combined single limit or $1,000,000.00 Bodily Injury, $1,000,000.00 Property Damage.
c) If this IGA involves professional services, professional liability insurance in the amount of
$1,000,000.00.
d) If required by law, workers’ compensation coverage including employees’ liability coverage.
The above requirements may be met through self insurance pursuant to A.R.S. §§ 11 -261 and
11-981 or participation in an insurance risk pool under A.R.S. § 11 -952.01 at no less than the
minimal coverage levels set forth in this article. Parties to this IGA shall provide thirty (30) days
written notice to all other parties of cancellation, non-renewal or material change of coverage.
8. Non-Appropriation. Notwithstanding any other provision in this IGA, this IGA may be
terminated if for any reason the Pima County Board of Supervisors does not appropriate
sufficient monies for the purpose of maintaining this IGA. In the event of such cancellation,
4
County shall have no further obligation to the Town other than for services already provided.
9. Termination. Either party may, at any time and without cause, terminate this IGA by providing
ninety (90) days written notice of intent to terminate.
10. Conflict of Interest. This IGA is subject to cancellation for conflict of interest pursuant to the
provisions of ARS § 38-511, the pertinent provisions of which are incorporated herein by
reference.
11. Compliance with Laws. Each party to this IGA comply with all federal, state, and local laws,
rules, regulations, standards, and Executive Orders, without limitation to those designated within
this IGA. The laws and regulations of the State of Arizona shall govern the rights of the parties,
the performance of this IGA, and any disputes hereunder. Any action relating to this IGA shall
be brought in a court of the State of Arizona in Pim a County. Any charges in the governing
laws, rules, and regulations during the terms of this IGA shall apply, but do not require an
amendment.
12. Non-Discrimination. Town and County will not discriminate against any Town or County
employee, client or any other individual in any way involved with the T own or County, because
of race, age, creed, color, religion, sex, disability or national origin in the course of carrying out
duties pursuant to this Intergovernmental Agreement. Town and County agree to comply with
the provisions of Arizona Executive Order 99-4, which are incorporated into this agreement by
reference as if set forth in full.
13. ADA. Each party shall comply with all applic able provisions of the Americans with Disabilities
Act (Public Law 101-336, 42 U.S.C. 12101-12213) and all applicable federal regulations under
the Act, including 28 CFR Parts 35 and 36.
14. Legal Authority. Neither party warrants to the other its legal authority to enter into this IGA. If
a court, at the request of a third person, should declare that either party lacks authority to enter
into this IGA, or any part of it, then the IGA, or parts of it affected by such order, shall be null and
void, and no recovery may be had by either party against the other for lack of performance or
otherwise.
15. Workers’ Compensation. Each party shall comply with the notice of A.R.S. § 23-1022(E).
For purposes of A.R.S. § 23-1022, irrespective of the operations pr otocol in place, each party is
solely responsible for the payment of Workers’ Compensation benefits for its employees.
16. No Joint Venture. It is not intended by this IGA to, and nothing contained in this IGA shall be
construed to, create any partnership, joint venture or employment relationship between the
parties or create any employer-employee relationship between County and Town employees, or
between Town and any County employees. Neither party shall be liable for any debts,
accounts, obligations or other liabilities whatsoever of the other, including, without limitation, the
other party’s obligation to withhold Social Security and income taxes for itself or any of its
employees.
17. No Third Party Beneficiaries. Nothing in the provisions of this IGA is intended to create duties
or obligations to or rights in third parties not parties to this IGA or affect the legal liability of either
party to the IGA by imposing any standard of care with respect to the maintena nce of public
facilities different from the standard of care imposed by law.
5
18. Severability. If any provision of this IGA, or any application thereof to the parties or any person
or circumstances, is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect othe r provisions or applications
of this IGA which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application and to this end
the provisions of this IGA are declared to be severable.
19. Notice. Any notice required or permitted to be given under this IGA shall be in writing and shall
be served by delivery or by certified mail upon the other party as follows (or at such other
address as may be identified by a party in writing to the other party):
County: Town:
Pima County Sheriff’s Department Town of Oro Valley
Corrections Bureau Chief 11000 North La Canada Dr.
1750 E. Benson Highway Oro Valley, AZ 85737
Tucson, AZ 85714
With copies to:
County Administrator
130 W. Congress St., 10th Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701
Clerk of the Board
130 W. Congress St., 5th Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701
20. Entire Agreement. This document constitutes the entire agreement between the parties
pertaining to the subject matter hereof, and all prior contemporaneous agreements and
understandings, oral or written, are hereby superseded and merged herein. This IGA shall not
be modified, amended, altered or extended except through a written amendment executed by
the parties.
Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank
6
In Witness Whereof, County has caused this Intergovernmental Agreement to be executed by
the Chairman of its Board of Supervisors, upon resolution of the Board and attested to by the
Clerk of the Board, and Town has caused this Intergovernmental Agreement to be executed by
the Mayor upon resolution of its Town Council and attested to by the Town Clerk:
ATTEST: TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, a municipal corporation
___________________________________ ___________________________________
Town of Oro Valley Clerk Mayor
Date Date
ATTEST: PIMA COUNTY, a body politic
____________________________________ ___________________________________
Clerk, Board of Supervisors Chairman, Board of Supervisors
Date Date
7
Intergovernmental Agreement Determination
The foregoing Intergovernmental Agreement between Pima County and the Town of Oro Valley has
been reviewed pursuant to A.R.S. § 11-952 by the undersigned, who have determined that it is in
proper form and is within the powers and authority granted under th e laws of the State of Arizona to
those parties to the Intergovernmental Agreement represented by the undersigned.
PIMA COUNTY: TOWN OF ORO VALLEY:
__________________________________ _________________________________
Deputy County Attorney Town of Oro Valley Attorney
Town Council Regular and Study Session C.
Meeting Date:07/01/2020
Requested by: Bayer Vella, Community and Economic Development
Submitted By:Hannah Oden, Community and Economic Development
Case Number: 2000761
SUBJECT:
Request for approval of a Conceptual Architecture request for a new multi-purpose building at Pusch Ridge
Christian Academy
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the proposal, as shown in Attachment 1, at its
June 2, 2020 meeting.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The purpose of this request is to consider Conceptual
Architecture for the addition of an approximately 17,000
square foot multi-purpose building at Pusch Ridge Christian
Academy (Attachment 1). The campus is located east of
Oracle Road between Calle Concordia and Linda Vista
Boulevard, as shown on the map to the right.
The property is zoned as Private Schools and Churches.
This zoning district permits buildings up to 24 feet in height,
but gymnasiums may be increased to 36 feet subject to
Planning and Zoning Commission approval. The Planning
and Zoning Commission approved this height allowance at
their June 2, 2020 meeting, as the proposed multi-purpose
building includes a gymnasium.
The proposed building uses similar architectural and design
features found throughout the existing campus and
conforms to the previously approved Master Development
Plan.
The proposal is in conformance with the Design Principles and Design Standards of the Zoning Code. Planning and
Zoning Commission recommended approval at the June 2, 2020 meeting.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
Related Approvals
1980: Development Plan approved
2003: Updated Master Development Plan Approved by Town Council
2003: Revised Master Development Plan Approved, dividing a 40,000 sf classroom building into two separate
buildings
2003: Architecture for a classroom building (Building 2) approved by the Development Review Board
2019: Architecture for a classroom building (Building 3) and a modular building approved by Town Council
2020: Revised Master Development Plan approved, reflecting Building 3 and the modular building
2020: Public Art approved for the campus by Town Council
Existing Site Conditions
Zoning: Private Schools and Churches
Area of the development is 48.17 acres
Soccer, baseball, and football fields
Basketball court
Parking areas
Modular buildings
Building 1 (51,470 sf)
Classroom Building 2 (18,600 sf)
Classroom Building 3 (under construction, 20,400 sf)
Proposed Improvements
Construct a new approximately 17,000 sf multi-purpose building
The proposed multi-purpose building will be located south of the
outdoor performing arts amphitheater near the main entrance to
the school. The structure will be situated near Building 2 and a
future modular building, as shown in the image to the right and
in Attachment 2. It uses similar architectural elements and colors
as the design of existing buildings on campus. The proposed
location is in conformance with the previously approved Master
Development Plan (Attachment 3).
Conceptual Architecture is reviewed for conformance with the
Design Principles and Design Standards of the Zoning Code.
The following is a list of noteworthy Design
Principles in italics followed by staff commentary:
Conceptual Architectural Design Review Principles, Zoning
Code
Section 22.9.D.5.b.i: Design: building architectural design shall be appropriate for the climate and characteristics of
the Sonoran Desert, including indigenous and traditional textures, colors, and shapes found in and around Oro
Valley. All development shall maintain and strengthen the high quality of design exemplified in Oro Valley through
project creativity and design excellence.
The proposed multi-purpose building incorporates architectural styles, materials, and colors found in the Oro Valley
area and compliments the existing buildings and overall style of the campus, particularly Buildings 2 and 3 which
have a complimentary design (Attachment 4). The multi-purpose building uses similar colors and materials as the
existing classroom buildings including smooth and split face CMU block, metal panels with a rusted finish, and
metal canopies over the entrances and covered patios painted to match the existing buildings. Awnings over the
windows promote energy conservation and a design appropriate to the Sonoran Desert environment. Overall, the
design of the proposed multi-purpose building and the durable materials used creates a cohesive design and
compliments the larger campus and Oro Valley community.
Section 22.9.D.5.b.ii: Scale, Height and Mass: building scale, height and mass shall be consistent with the
Town-approved intensity of the site, designated scenic corridors, and valued mountain views. Buildings shall be
designed to respect the scale of adjoining areas and should mitigate the negative and functional impacts that arise
from scale, bulk and mass.
The height of the proposed multi-purpose building is 36 feet to the top of the parapet. Section 23.8.E.1 of the Town
Zoning Code permits buildings up to 24 feet tall in the subject zoning district and gymnasiums may be up to 36 feet
tall subject to Planning and Zoning Commission approval. The proposed multi-purpose building includes a
gymnasium (Attachment 5), and the Planning and Zoning Commission voted to approve this height allowance at the
June 2, 2020 meeting. Existing buildings on campus range from 18 feet to 28 feet in height. The proposed
multi-purpose building will be the tallest on campus, but is within the height allowance permitted by the Zoning
Code.
Regarding potential visual impacts from the requested height, the multi-purpose building is proposed just southeast
of the main entrance to the school adjacent to the outdoor performing arts amphitheater, which is a focal point of
the campus. West of the proposed building is a parking lot and Oracle Road is over 700 feet away. A view rendering
of the proposed building from Oracle Road is included in Attachment 1. East of the proposed building is Building 2
(existing classrooms), and National Forest Service land. The building will have little to no visual impact from
adjacent properties or roadways due to its distance from surrounding areas, topography, and existing vegetation.
All mechanical equipment, such as air conditioning units, will be mounted on the roof and fully screened.
The footprint of the multi-purpose building mirrors that of other campus buildings and is within the approved square
footage indicted on the original Master Development Plan approved in 2003 (Attachment 3). The applicant has
stepped back the top portion of the building on the south, east, and west facades which serves to break up the
mass of the building. Rusted metal paneling, parapets, windows, and a covered entryway and patio also work to
soften the bulk of the building.
Section 22.9.D.5.b.iii: Facade Articulation: all building facades shall be fully articulated, including variation in
building massing, roof planes, wall planes, and surface articulation. Architectural elements including, but not limited
to, overhangs, trellises, projections, awnings, insets, material, and texture shall be used to create visual interest that
contributes to a building’s character.
As previously mentioned, the proposed multi-purpose building utilizes varied wall planes by stepping back the top
part of the building on three facades. All four sides of the building also use a variety of colors and materials that add
visual interest and compliments the larger campus. The main entrance to the building is on the north elevation and
the applicant has included a covered entry-way that adds dimension to the prominent facade. Numerous windows
on the north elevation also articulate the part of the building that will be most visible from within the main campus.
The east elevation faces National Forest and Building 2 and is not visible from the campus entrance or parking lot.
Because of this, and the interior layout of the building, including a performance stage, (Attachment 5), no windows
have been included aside from the entrance. The east facade does have a covered patio over the entrance and the
maintenance ladder will be painted to match the metal paneling.
The south facade will also not be visible and sits lower due to topography. Due to bathrooms and locker rooms on
this end of the building, no windows have been added to the lower level of the building but the upper portion does
have windows. The west elevation is where storage and kitchen facilities are located and additional windows on the
lower portion is difficult (Attachment 5). The west elevation faces the school parking lot and a future modular
building.
Overall, the applicant has used a variety of colors, materials, projections, and variations of the wall planes that
successfully articulate all facades of the building and break up its mass and bulk. As shown, the proposed
conceptual architecture complies with the Zoning Code.
Design Standards Analysis
The proposed multi-purpose building is in conformance with the Design Standards found in Addendum A of the
Town Zoning Code by providing four sided architecture, articulated facades, varied roof lines with the use of
parapets, and a varied material and color pallette. The mass of the proposed multi-purpose building is also
minimized by using varied wall planes, awnings and covered entryways, and the use of two types of masonry block
that add a variety of texture. The overall design of the building compliments the existing color, massing, and
materials of existing structures at Pusch Ridge Christian Academy.
Summary and Recommendation
This proposal has been reviewed for conformance with both the Design Principles and Design Standards of the
Zoning Code. The Planning and Zoning Commission has found that the request complies with the review criteria
and recommended approval at the June 2, 2020 meeting. The staff report provided to Planning and Zoning
Commission is included in Attachment 6 and draft meeting minutes are included in Attachment 7.
FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
N/A
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to APPROVE the Conceptual Architecture for the proposed multi-purpose building at Pusch Ridge Christian
Academy, based on the findings that the request complies with the Design Principles and Design Standards of the
Zoning Code.
OR
I MOVE to DENY the Conceptual Architecture for the proposed multi-purpose building at Pusch Ridge Christian
Academy, based on a finding that ____________.
Attachments
Attachment 1: Applicant Submittal
Attachment 2: School Map
Attachment 3: Approved Master Development Plan
Attachment 4: Photos of Existing Campus Buildings
Attachment 5: Proposed Floor Plan
Attachment 6: Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report June 2, 2020
Attachment 7: Draft Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes: June 2, 2020
CONCEPTUAL ARCHITECTURE REVIEW SUBMITAL - Revision 1
Pusch Ridge Christian Academy | Oro Valley, AZ | April 23, 2020
NORTHEAST PERSPECTIVE
PUSCH RIDGE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY
9500 N. ORACLE RD. ORO VALLEY,AZ
EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE OF SOUTHEAST CORNER
Pusch Ridge Christian Academy | Oro Valley, AZ |April 23, 2020
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The proposed project is a 17,000 s.f. Multi-Purpose Room for
Pusch Ridge Christian Academy on an 48.59-acre parcel on the
corner of Oracle Rd and Linda Vista Blvd. The building comprise
of a full kitchen, basketball court / cafeteria, locker rooms,
restroom, offices and a performance platform. The MPR is
developed for up to 740 occupants from the existing school.
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN STRATEGY:
The building takes cues from its surrounding landscape to
reflect the colors of the desert. The use of colored split face
block and stacked blocks and on each façade allows us to have
3 distinct materials. Mases are articulated and gradually broken
up with the use of metal panels. The main entrance is marked
by the intersection of the protruding tower and the shade
canopy. Awnings that provide protection for the doors and
windows are similar to ones found on campus. The large shade
structure mimics the existing in color and scale.
Proposed Site Plan
KEYED NOTES
CO
HARDSCAPE SC
RETAINING WALL, SEE PLANS BY CIVIL ENGINEER
UTILITY LINE, SEE PLANS BY CIVIL ENGINEER
STORM DRAIN PIPE, SEE PLANS BY CIVIL ENGINEER
SIDEWALK GRATE, SEE PLANS BY CIVIL ENGINEER
RIP RAP, SEE PLANS BY CIVIL ENGINEER FOR SIZE ANDDEPTH, SEE LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE FOR COLOR AND QTY.
NEW CONCRETE SIDEWALK,
SEE HARDSCAPE SCHEDULE FOR MORE INFO
X
C.X CIVIL
C.1
C.2
C.3
C.4
C.5
L.X LANDSCAPE / HARDSCAPE
L.1
WALL, SEE ARCHITECTURE PLANS
PATIO COLUMN, SEE ARCHITECTURE PLANS
A.X ARCHITECTURE
A.1
A.2
EXISTING CURB, DO NOT DISTURB
EXISTING SIDEWALK, DO NOT DISTURB
EXISTING LANDSCAPE, DO NOT DISTURBSEE LANDSCAPE LEGEND AND SCHEDULE
EXISTING GRASS, DO NOT DISTURB
X.X EXISTING, DO NOT DISTURB
X.1
X.2
X.3
X.4
COLOR: REGULAR GRAY
WITH MEDIUM BROOM
SEE PLAN FOR JOINTS
SEE DETAIL 10/L1.2
KEY SYMBOL MATERIAL
REGULAR CONCRET
DN
F.E.
F .E.
F.E.oooo o o oooooooooooo
oooooooooooo o o o o o o
ooS S SSSS S S S SSSS S S S SSS S S
S S SSSSS S S SSSS S S S SSS SS S S SSS
SS S
S S SS SS S S S SSSS S S SSSS S S S S S
SSS S S S SSSS S S S SSS SS S S SSSS S S
SSSS S S S S SSSSS S S SSSS S S S S SS SS
SS SSSSS S S S SSS S S S S SSS S S S S SSS S S
S S SSSSS S S SSSS S S S SSS S S S S S
SSS
SS S S SSS S S S S SSSS S S SSSS S S
SS S
SSS S S S SSSS S S S SSS S S S S SSSS
SS S
SSSS S S S SSSSS S S SSSS S S S S SS SS
SS SSSSS S S SSSS S S S S SSSS S S S SSSS S S S SSSSS S S SSSS S S S SSS S S S S SSSS
S S S SSSS S S S S SS SS S S SSSSS S S
SSSSS S S S SSSS S S S
S
S
S
SSS
S
S SSSSSS
S
S
SSSS
S
S
S
SSSS
S SSSSSS
S
S
SSSS
S
S
S
SSSS SSSSSSS
S
S
SSSSS
S
S
SSSS SSSSSSSS
S
S
SSS
S
S
S
SSS SSSSSSSSS
S
S
SSSS
S
S
S
SSS SSSSSSSS
S
S
SSSS
S
S
S
SSS
S SSSSSSS
S
S
SSSSS
S
S
SSSS SSSSSSS
S
S
S
SSSS
S
S
SSSS SSSSSSSS
S
S
SSSSS
S
S
SS SSSSSSSS
S
S
S
SSSS
S
S
S
SS SSSSSSSSS
S
S
S
SSSS
S
S
S
S SSSSSSSSS
S
S
S
SSSS
S
S
S
SS SSSS
SSSS
S
S
S
SSSS
S
S
S
SS SSSSSSSSS
S
S
SSSSS
S
S
SS SSSSSSSSS
S
S
S
SSS
S
S
S
S SSSW
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W WWWWWWGGGGGGGGGGS S SS S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S SSS S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S SS S S S S S S SSS S S S S S S S S S S S SS S S S S S S S S S S S S S SSS S S S S S S S S S S S SS S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S SSS S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S SS S S S S S S S S S S S S SS S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S SSS S S S S S S S S S S S SS S S S S S S S S S S S S S SSS S S S S S S S S S S SS S S S S S S S S S S S S S SS S S S S S S S
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G WWWooooooooWWWWWW
W
W
W Go
oooooooo
o
oo o o o
ooooo o o o
ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooW
GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSW SSSW BF
F F F
F
G G G
SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD
123
127
E EEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E E E E E E E E E E E
E EEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E E E E E E E E E E E
2665
266226632664
2666
2665
2662
2663
2664
2665
2670
2664
2666
2667
2668
2669
2660
266526702657
2658
265
9
2661
2662
2663
26642666266726682669267126722673267426552655265326
5
3
26542
6
5
4
265626
5
6
26572657265826602665 26582
6
5
9
266
1
2662
2663
2664
2666
26
6
7
26
6
8
49
52
53
55
50
51
56
57
59
63
61
62
60
45
65
115
122
125
126
124
40
2
37
41
42
43
44
47
48
129
130
BF
X.2
X.2
X.1
X.3
X.3
X.3
X.3
X.3
X.2
X.2
X.4
X.4
C.1
A.1
A.2
A.1
A.2
COL.1
L.1
CO
CO
L.1
CO L.1
COL.1
COL.1
A.1
3
4
5
6
9
10
11
13
16
20
18
19
22
24
23 27
3032
31
35
36
58
66
6768 69
70
71
74
78
80
84
89
90
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
105106107
108
110
111
112
117
120
91
114
46
128
118
39
54
83
38
34
21
19
93
C.2
C.2
C.3
C.3
C.4
C.4
C.4
COVERED
PATIO
COVERED
PATIO
TYP.
TYP.
TYP.
TYP.
TYP.
TYP.
TYP.
TYP.
TYP.
TYP.
TYP.
TYP.TYP.
TYP.
TYP.
TYP.
TYP.
FUTURE
BUILDING
NEW BUILDING
SEE PLANS BY ARCHITECT
FF: 2663.0
TYP.
TYP.
TYP.
84
84
LEGEND
EASEMENT LI
PROPERTY LIN
EXISTING CON
PROPOSED C
WORK LIMIT L
1.FUTURE BUILDING AREA PLANTS ARE SHOWN
FOR REFERENCE ONLY, CONTRACTOR SHALL
COORDINATE WITH OWNER OR OTHERS FOR
THIS ACTIVITY.
2.TREES IN AREA OF FUTURE BUILDING SHALL
ONLY BE SALVAGED AND TRANSPLANTED IF
THERE IS CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY.
3.IF NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY OCCURS, THEN
PLANTS SHALL BE PROTECTED IN PLACE.
NOTE:
EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE OF NORTHWEST CORNER
Pusch Ridge Christian Academy | Oro Valley, AZ | April 23, 2020
EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE OF SOUTHEAST CORNER
Pusch Ridge Christian Academy | Oro Valley, AZ | April 23, 2020
SITE PLAN
Pusch Ridge Christian Academy | Oro Valley, AZ | April 23, 2020
BLDG A BLDG C ORACLE RDE LINDA VISTA
Parcel Number: 225-100-64D
Address: 9500 N Oracle Rd
Land Use: Education
Area: 48.59 AC
Total parking: 83 spaces Req. 101 provided
ADA parking: 4 Req. 7 provided
Zone: PS
NEW PROPOSED MPR
PARKING
PARKING
BLDG B
MATERIALS BOARD
Pusch Ridge Christian Academy | Oro Valley, AZ | April 23, 2020
1
4 5 6
3
2
5a MATERIALS KEY:
1. 8” CMU, Stacked, Color: DE6117, Colorado Trail, LRV=30
2. 12” CMU , Running bond, Color: DE6117, Colorado Trail,
LRV=30
3. Split face CMU, Running Bond, Color: DE6118, Sandpit, LRV
=21
4. Structure Accent paint, Color: DE5520 Crocodile Tears- to
match existing color LRV=60
5. Metal panel, Mfr: Bunger steel, Profile: C-Panel, Color:
Bunger Rust. LRV= 29
5a. Accent paint Color : DE712, Briar, LRV=10, Access ladder ,
doors in metal popout
6. Anodized aluminum window frame. LRV=58.5
5
5a
BUILDING ELEVATIONS
Scale:1/32” = 1’-0”
Pusch Ridge Christian Academy | Oro Valley, AZ | April 23, 2020
EAST BUILDING ELEVATION
2
45
1
NORTH BUILDING ELEVATION
ELEVATION KEYNOTES:
1. 8” CMU, Stacked, Color: DE6117, Colorado Trail
2. 12” CMU , Running bond, Color: DE6117, Colorado Trail
3. Split face CMU, Running Bond, Color: DE6118, Sandpit
4. Structure Accent paint, Mfr: Dunn Edwards, Color: 5520 Crocodile Tears
5. Metal panel, Mfr: Bunger steel, Profile: C-Panel, Color: Bunger Rust.
5a. Accent paint Color : DE712, Briar, LRV=10, Access ladder , doors in metal
popout
6. Anodized aluminum window frame.
3
6
451
2
3
4
GENERAL NOTE:
Mechanical units will all be screen thru the use of
parapets and taking into account perspective sight lines.
If any units are visible from public view, we will provide
mechanical screens painted the same color as the
building.
Roof drain leaders are located inside the metal popouts.
with over flow protuding out
F.F.E.
0"
T.O.P GYM
36' -0"
T.O.P.
20' -0"
F.F.E.
0"
T.O.P GYM
36' -0"
T.O.P.
20' -0"
REVISION DATE DESCRIPTION BY
PROJECT NO.
DATE
SCALE
DRAWING TITLE
DRAWING NUMBER
DRAWN BY
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
1/8" = 1'-0"4/23/2020 4:08:19 PMNEW MPR FOR:
PUSCH RIDGE CHRISTIAN
ACADEMY
9500 N ORACLE RD ORO VALLEY
85142
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
SD102
EXTERIOR BUILDING
ELEVATIONS
KN
APRIL 20, 2020
1/8" = 1'-0"SD102
3 EAST BUILDING ELEVATION
1/8" = 1'-0"SD102
1 SOUTH BUILDING ELEVATION
1/8" = 1'-0"SD102
2 WEST BUILDING ELEVATION
F.F.E.
0"
T.O.P GYM
36' -0"
T.O.P.
20' -0"
F.F.E.
0"
T.O.P GYM
36' -0"
T.O.P.
20' -0"
REVISION DATE DESCRIPTION BY
PROJECT NO.
DATE
SCALE
DRAWING TITLE
DRAWING NUMBER
DRAWN BY
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
1/8" = 1'-0"4/23/2020 4:08:19 PMNEW MPR FOR:
PUSCH RIDGE CHRISTIAN
ACADEMY
9500 N ORACLE RD ORO VALLEY
85142
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
SD102
EXTERIOR BUILDING
ELEVATIONS
KN
APRIL 20, 2020
1/8" = 1'-0"SD102
1 SOUTH BUILDING ELEVATION
1/8" = 1'-0"SD102
2 WEST BUILDING ELEVATION
4
5
3
7
BUILDING ELEVATIONS
Scale:1/32” = 1’-0”
Pusch Ridge Christian Academy | Oro Valley, AZ | April 23, 2020
SOUTH BUILDING ELEVATION
WEST BUILDING ELEVATION
4 5
3
GENERAL NOTE:
Mechanical units will all be screen thru the use of
parapets and taking into account perspective sight lines.
If any units are visible from public view, we will provide
mechanical screens painted the same color as the
building.
Roof drain leaders are located inside the metal popouts.
with over flow protuding out
1
2 3
5 1 2
4 6
ELEVATION KEYNOTES:
1. 8” CMU, Stacked, Color: DE6117, Colorado Trail
2. 12” CMU , Running bond, Color: DE6117, Colorado Trail
3. Split face CMU, Running Bond, Color: DE6118, Sandpit
4. Structure Accent paint, Mfr: Dunn Edwards, Color: 5520 Crocodile Tears
5. Metal panel, Mfr: Bunger steel, Profile: C-Panel, Color: Bunger Rust.
5a. Accent paint Color : DE712, Briar, LRV=10, Access ladder , doors in metal
popout
6. Anodized aluminum window frame.
7. Electrical enclosure for SES to receive same metal treatment as the popouts.
5a
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
Pusch Ridge Christian Academy | Oro Valley, AZ | April 23, 2020
SITE PHOTO: BLDG A SITE PHOTO: BLDG C
SITE PHOTO: BLDG A SITE PHOTO: BLDG B
SITE PHOTO: PROPOSED SITE SITE PHOTO: BLDG B
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
Pusch Ridge Christian Academy | Oro Valley, AZ | April 23, 2020
RENDERED VIEW FROM ORACLE RD
Attachment 2: School Map
Pusch Ridge Christian Academy
Proposed Conceptual Architecture: 2000761
Existing
Building 1
Building 3 (under
construction)
Existing
Building 2
Modular (under
construction)
Existing
Amphitheater
Proposed Multi-
Purpose Building
REVISION 1 ACCEPTANCE ________________________________________ __________ PLANNING AND ZONING ADMINISTRATOR DATE ________________________________________ __________ TOWN ENGINEER DATE ________________________________________ __________ ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY DIRECTOR DATEREVISION 1 SEE NEW SHEET 58/26/19REVISION 1REV 1
5PUSCH RIDGE CHRISTIAN ACADEMYMASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVISION 1
5A
Attachment 4: Photos of Existing Campus Buildings
Pusch Ridge Christian Academy
Proposed Conceptual Architecture: 2000761
Building 1
Attachment 4: Photos of Existing Campus Buildings
Pusch Ridge Christian Academy
Proposed Conceptual Architecture: 2000761
Building 2
Attachment 4: Photos of Existing Campus Buildings
Pusch Ridge Christian Academy
Proposed Conceptual Architecture: 2000761
Approved Architecture for Building 3
DNWDFTTOFFICE/CLASSROOMA133PESTORAGEA132TELE/ELEC.A135STORAGEA143PLATFORMA130COURTA100STORAGEA131COVEREDPATIO -SOUTHA159FOLDABLETABLEA142KITCHENA149FOODPICK-UPA141DRYSTORAGEA148JAN/ W.H.A138M.LOCKERSA136W.LOCKERSA1444' - 8 3/4"2' - 11 3/8"15' - 7 7/8"8"8"6' - 8"15' - 4"9' - 4"2' - 0"35' - 4"10' - 0"5' - 4"14' - 0"5' - 4"2' - 8"COVEREDPORCH -NORTHA152W.RESTROOMA139M.RESTROOMA1371234ABCD32' - 8"76' - 0"30' - 8"3' - 4"11' - 2"3' - 4"94' - 0"37' - 4"32' - 8"8"75' - 4"8"30' - 0"38' - 0"12' - 0"42' - 0"12' - 0"4' - 8"2' - 8"3' - 4"6' - 0"8' - 0"10' - 8"33' - 4"4' - 0"30' - 0"3' - 4"15' - 4"2' - 0"6' - 0"1' - 4"36' - 0"2' - 0"10' - 0"19' - 4"3' - 4"2' - 8"22' - 0"6' - 8"68' - 8"3' - 4"9' - 4"3' - 4"7' - 4"3' - 4"7' - 4"3' - 4"8"31' - 7 3/8"12' - 1 3/8"12' - 6 5/8"8' - 0 1/8"27' - 9 5/8"8' - 8 5/8"11 5/8"28' - 2 5/8"8"8"28' - 2 5/8"9' - 6 3/8"34' - 5 1/2"5' - 4 1/4"8' - 8 5/8"17' - 9 1/2"6' - 2 1/2"106' - 4"1' - 0"8"3' - 10 1/2"3' - 1 5/8"15' - 7 7/8"8"8"22' - 8"8"1' - 4"10' - 0"2' - 8"6' - 0"15' - 4"33' - 4"2' - 11 7/8"2' - 4 1/8"3' - 4"7' - 4"4' - 0"8"3' - 4"4' - 0"6' - 0"7' - 4"8"32' - 8"8"13' - 6 7/8"3' - 11 7/8"14' - 4 7/8"14' - 1 3/4"3' - 11 7/8"13' - 10"11' - 4 7/8"8"8"32' - 0"8"27' - 4"3' - 4"2' - 8"3' - 4"34' - 8"3' - 4"8"8"5' - 6 3/4"12' - 5 1/2"39' - 6 1/4"8' - 10 7/8"8' - 6 3/4"20' - 11 7/8"8"5' - 6 3/4"12' - 5 1/2"4' - 2"31' - 2 5/8"4' - 1 5/8"6' - 10"10' - 7 5/8"20' - 11 7/8"8"134' - 8"14' - 6"32' - 0"8"7' - 2 3/4"5' - 4"5' - 0"4' - 3 3/8"10' - 1 1/2"9' - 10 3/8"4' - 3 3/8"4' - 10 3/4"5' - 4"7' - 7"11' - 4 7/8"2' - 1 5/8"2' - 0 1/4"4' - 4 7/8"14' - 8 1/2"6' - 6 3/8"2' - 4 1/8"8"16' - 0"2' - 10"7' - 8 1/8"5' - 5 7/8"8"73' - 2 1/2"4' - 1 3/4"22' - 5 1/8"5' - 6 3/4"8"8' - 2 3/8"11' - 8"6' - 7 3/4"6' - 5 1/2"72' - 10 7/8"8"5' - 3 1/8"2' - 1 1/2"1' - 2 1/2"17' - 0"3' - 5"3' - 0"32' - 8"3' - 4"14' - 10"3' - 4"14' - 10"3' - 4"14' - 10"3' - 4"14' - 10"3' - 4"5' - 1 1/2"8' - 5 7/8"18' - 7"131' - 4"109' - 4"30' - 0"32' - 8"76' - 0"30' - 8"139' - 4"5' - 0"11' - 4"21' - 4"4' - 0"51' - 4"20' - 8"30' - 8"11' - 4"47' - 0"8' - 0"53' - 8"11' - 4"9' - 4"41' - 0"8' - 0"41' - 8"9' - 4"17' - 4"9' - 4"3' - 4"26' - 8"3' - 4"11' - 4"33' - 9"8' - 0"32' - 11"11' - 4"T.O.W 3' - 4"T.O.W 4' - 8"REVISIONDATEDESCRIPTIONBYPROJECT NO.DATESCALEDRAWING TITLEDRAWING NUMBERDRAWN BYPRELIMINARYNOT FORCONSTRUCTION1/8" = 1'-0"4/27/2020 3:52:08 PMNEW MPR FOR:PUSCH RIDGE CHRISTIANACADEMY9500 N ORACLE RD ORO VALLEY85142CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTSA103DIMENSIONED FLOOR PLANKNAPRIL 27, 20201/8" = 1'-0"A1031DIMENSION FLOOR PLANNOTE: -INTERIOR DIMENSIONS ARE TAKEN FROM FACE OF STUD OR MASONRY TO CENTER OF WALL CORE. -EXTERIOR DIMENSIONS ARE TAKEN FROM FACE OF SHEATHING TO CENTER LINE OF WINDOWS AND DOORS.
D R A F T
MINUTES
ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
REGULAR SESSION
June 2, 2020
MEETING HELD VIA ZOOM
REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER
Chair Gambill called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Present: Celeste Gambill, Chair
Jacob Herrington, Vice Chair
Hal Bergsma, Commissioner
Neal Herst, Commissioner
Ellen Hong, Commissioner
Skeet Posey, Commissioner
Daniel Sturmon, Commissioner
Staff Present:Michael Spaeth, Principal Planner
Joe Andrews, Chief Civil Deputy Attorney
Commissioner Hong arrived at 6:02 p.m.
Chair Gambill provided instructions on how to participate in tonight's meeting.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
CALL TO AUDIENCE
There were no speaker requests.
COUNCIL LIAISON COMMENTS
Council Liaison Melanie Barrett provided updates on past and upcoming Council meeting agenda items.
REGULAR SESSION AGENDA
1.REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE MAY 5, 2020 REGULAR SESSION MEETING MINUTES
Motion by Commissioner Neal Herst, seconded by Commissioner Daniel Sturmon to approve the May 5,
2020 meeting minutes as written.
A roll call vote was taken:
A roll call vote was taken:
Chair Gambill - Aye
Vice Chair Herrington - Aye
Commissioner Bergsma - Aye
Commissioner Herst - Aye
Commissioner Hong - Aye
Commissioner Posey - Aye
Commissioner Sturmon - Aye
Vote: 7 - 0 Carried
2.DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON A CONCEPTUAL ARCHITECTURE REQUEST FOR A NEW
MULTI-PURPOSE BUILDING AT PUSCH RIDGE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY, 2000761
Senior Planner Hannah Oden provided a presentation that included the following:
- Purpose
- Location
- Proposed building location
- Proposed multi-purpose building
- View from Oracle Road
- Compatibility with existing campus development
- Summary and recommendation
Applicant Mark Cueva with Carhuff and Cueva Architects, provided a presentation that included the
following:
- The reason/need for the building
- Exterior perspectives of the building
- Site plan showing location of the building
- Sample of materials proposed
- Detailed layout of the floor plan and uses
- Building elevations
- Site photos of the campus
- View from Oracle Road
Discussion ensued among the Commission and applicant.
Chair Gambill opened the public hearing.
There were no speaker requests.
Chair Gambill closed the public hearing.
Further discussion ensued among the Commission and applicant.
Motion by Vice Chair Jacob Herrington, seconded by Commissioner Skeet Posey to recommend approval
of the Conceptual Architecture for the proposed multi-purpose building at Pusch Ridge Christian Academy,
based on the findings that the request complies with the Design Principles and Design Standards of the
Zoning Code.
A roll call vote was taken:
A roll call vote was taken:
Chair Gambill - Aye
Vice Chair Herrington - Aye
Commissioner Bergsma - Aye
Commissioner Herst - Aye
Commissioner Hong - Aye
Commissioner Posey - Aye
Commissioner Sturmon - Aye
Vote: 7 - 0 Carried
3.DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON A REQUEST FOR CONCEPTUAL MODEL HOME
ARCHITECTURE FOR THE MILLER RANCH SUBDIVISION, LOCATED NEAR THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF TANGERINE ROAD AND LA CAÑADA DRIVE, 2000236
Planning Intern Michela Wilson provided a presentation that included the following:
- Purpose
- Location
- Approved site plan
- Design principles and standards
- Elevations
- Colors and materials
- Compatibility - photos from surrounding area
- Condition of Approval 1
- Condition of Approval 2
- Summary and recommendation
Applicant Brent Davis, representing D.R. Horton, provided a presentation that included the following:
- Rendering of entrance sign for the subdivision
- Site layout
- Six floor plans with three elevations and six color schemes
- Architectural features
- Colors and materials
- All homes meet energy star certification and include smart home technology
- Review of the model plans and elevations: Opal, Jade, Onyx, Savannah, Sabino and Ventana
- Aerial view of area
- Existing homes in the area
- Photos of Lehman Academy and neighboring community
Discussion ensued among the Commission and applicant.
Chair Gambill opened the public hearing.
There were no speaker requests.
Chair Gambill closed the public hearing.
Further discussion continued among the Commission and applicant.
Motion by Commissioner Skeet Posey, seconded by Commissioner Neal Herst to approve the Conceptual
Model Home Architecture for six (6) model homes in the Miller Ranch subdivision, subject to both conditions
in Attachment #1, based on the findings that the request complies with the Design Principles and Design
Standards of the Zoning Code.
A roll call vote was taken:
Chair Gambill - Aye
Vice Chair Herrington - Aye
Commissioner Bergsma - Aye
Commissioner Herst - Aye
Commissioner Hong - Aye
Commissioner Posey - Aye
Commissioner Sturmon - Aye
Vote: 7 - 0 Carried
4.PUBLIC HEARING: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING A PROPOSED CODE
AMENDMENT TO THE NOISE ABATEMENT STANDARDS ONLY FOR NEW AND SPECIFIC LAND
USE TYPES AND SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS FOR CONVENIENCE USES OF THE ZONING CODE
Chair Gambill introduced the consultant, Dr. Lance Willis with Spendarian and Willis Acoustics and Noise
Control, who was in attendance to answer any questions related to this agenda item.
Principal Planner Michael Spaeth provided a presentation that included the following:
- Purpose
- Part 1: Noise abatement - existing standard is broken
- Part 1: Noise abatement - background
- Part 1: Noise abatement - proposed amendment
- Part 1: Noise abatement - scenario
- Part 2 Convenience use separation - convenience uses
- Part 2 Convenience use separation - proposal
- Part 2 Convenience use separation - scenario
- General Plan
- Summary and recommendation
Discussion ensued between the Commission, staff and the consultant.
Chair Gambill opened the public hearing.
- Keri Silvyn, a Zoning and Land Use lawyer who represents many developers in Oro Valley, spoke in
support of Agenda Item #4
- OV resident Tim Bohen spoke on Agenda Item #4
Discussion ensued in response to the public hearing comments.
Chair Gambill closed the public hearing.
Further discussion continued among the Commission and staff.
Motion by Commissioner Hal Bergsma, seconded by Vice Chair Jacob Herrington to continue
consideration of this matter until a future meeting to give staff time to provide more evidence related to how
the proposed standards compare to other jurisdictions in the area, in Arizona, and the rest of the country.
Staff asked for clarification on what information is being requested to provide. Commissioner Bergsma
stated what information he is requesting.
A roll call vote was taken:
A roll call vote was taken:
Chair Gambill - Nay
Vice Chair Herrington - Nay
Commissioner Bergsma - Aye
Commissioner Herst - Nay
Commissioner Hong - Aye
Commissioner Posey - Aye
Commissioner Sturmon - Nay
Vote: 3 - 4 Failed
OPPOSED: Chair Celeste Gambill
Vice Chair Jacob Herrington
Commissioner Neal Herst
Commissioner Daniel Sturmon
Motion by Commissioner Hal Bergsma, seconded by Commissioner Daniel Sturmon to continue
reconsideration of this matter to the next Commission meeting in July, allowing staff time to elaborate on
their findings and evidence by showing how the proposed standards compare to other jurisdictions, both
locally and nationally.
Discussion ensued among the Commission and staff.
A roll call vote was taken:
Chair Gambill - Nay
Vice Chair Herrington - Aye
Commissioner Bergsma - Aye
Commissioner Herst - Aye
Commissioner Hong - Aye
Commissioner Posey - Aye
Commissioner Sturmon - Aye
Vote: 6 - 1 Carried
OPPOSED: Chair Celeste Gambill
PLANNING UPDATE (INFORMATIONAL ONLY)
Principal Planner Michael Spaeth provided updates on upcoming neighborhood meetings and tentative items on the
next Commission agenda.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Vice Chair Jacob Herrington, seconded by Commissioner Skeet Posey to adjourn the meeting.
Chair Gambill adjourned the meeting at 8:34 p.m.
I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the regular session of the
I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the regular session of the
Town of Oro Valley Planning and Zoning Commission of Oro Valley, Arizona held on the 2nd day of June 2020. I
further certify that the meeting was duly called and held and that a quorum was present.
Dated this 11th day of June 2020.
___________________________
Jeanna Ancona
Senior Office Specialist
Town Council Regular and Study Session 1.
Meeting Date:07/01/2020
Submitted By:Mike Standish, Town Clerk's Office
Department:Town Clerk's Office
SUBJECT:
MATTERS RELATED TO A POSSIBLE AGREEMENT WITH 1) THE CANADA HILLS COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION/CANADA HILLS MASTER COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION AND/OR 2) THE VILLAGES OF LA
CANADA MASTER ASSOCIATION GENERALLY ABOUT FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTIONS TO TOWN GOLF
OPERATIONS (The HOA Agreement will be posted prior to the Council meeting)
A. EXECUTIVE SESSION (IF DESIRED OR DEEMED NECESSARY) - PURSUANT TO A.R.S. §38-431.03 (A)(3),
(4) FOR LEGAL ADVICE ON THE ABOVE DESCRIBED AGREEMENT AND/OR TO DISCUSS, CONSULT ON,
AND CONSIDER ITS POSITION ON THE ABOVE DESCRIBED AGREEMENT
B. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON THE ABOVE DESCRIBED AGREEMENT
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Town Council approve the agreement with the Canada Hills Community Association/Canada
Hills Master Community Association and the Villages of La Canada Master Association as presented.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
In October 2019, the Town Council approved a motion that provided certain conditions and parameters by which the Town would continue to
operate and invest in the Town's golf courses. One of the provisions stated:
The Canada Hills HOA will contribute up to $100k annually to reduce the tax support necessary for
the 36 hole option to include the Conquistador and Canada courses. This will be for a 10 year
period limited to 10% of the town’s audited figures for the previous year’s tax support needs. The
Villages of La Canada will contribute $25k per year under the same conditions as the Canada Hills
HOA. Payments will be made quarterly, beginning July 1, 2020.
The Town Manager and Town Attorney negotiated with the representatives of the two HOA's, resulting in
the agreement attached. The agreement provides for a 10-year period with contributions of the $100,000
and $25,000 specified in the motion, but removing the limitations the motion established to no more than
10% of the town's audited figures for the previous year's tax support needs, and instead securing the full
contribution for five years with an opportunity to renegotiate additional contributions in year 5 of the
agreement.
The agreement further stipulates the Town's commitment to abide by the other provisions of the
Council's motions on October 2 and November 6, 2019. It further provides for the possibility of extending
the irrigation investment in the courses one additional year due to the pandemic, should that be
necessary.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:
The Town will receive $125,000 per year for five years beginning with FY20/21, which will be placed in the
Community Center Fund to be applied toward the tax subsidy of operating the Town's golf courses.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to (approve or deny) the agreement with the Canada Hills Community Association/Canada Hills Master
Community Association and The Villages of La Canada Master Association.
Attachments
No file(s) attached.
Town Council Regular and Study Session 1.
Meeting Date:07/01/2020
Requested by: J.J. Johnston
Submitted By:J.J. Johnston, Community and Economic Development
Department:Community and Economic Development
SUBJECT:
PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION REGARDING THE ORO VALLEY PRIMARY EMPLOYER INCENTIVE
PROGRAM
RECOMMENDATION:
This item is for discussion purposes only. No action requested. Based on Town Council input and direction at the
study session, it is anticipated that this policy will be placed on the July 15 Council agenda for possible action.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The purpose of the Primary Employer Incentive Program is to help enable long-term financial sustainability in Oro
Valley through the creation of new primary job opportunities and the generation of new capital investments in the
Town. In accordance with the economic development goals embodied in the voter-approved General Plan, the
Town Council's Strategic Leadership Plan and the Council approved Comprehensive Economic Development
Strategy, this program is proposed to assist Oro Valley in its efforts to attract high quality primary job opportunities
and new capital investment to the community. If approved by Council, the Town of Oro Valley may offer different
incentives such as fee reductions or reimbursement of other eligible expenses, depending on the nature of the
project. Reimbursement amounts will be restricted to the amount of construction sales tax and related fees
collected by the Town in association with the project.
These incentive reimbursements will help offset qualifying expenditures by the primary employer such as required
new public infrastructure improvements, which could include partial offsets to impact fees, employee relocation and
qualified job training programs, exterior building aesthetics and renovation expenses. The program aims to
encourage the retention and expansion of existing primary employers. Additionally, the program will help attract
new primary employers to the Town.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
Oro Valley is without a primary employer incentive program which puts our economic development efforts at a
significant competitive disadvantage in the region. The Town's economic development team has generated dozens
of new primary employer projects; however, winning new primary employer projects is extremely competitive. Oro
Valley is in the 'final four' phase of the site selection process with several high quality prospects and all prospective
employers are requesting incentives. Companies and their consultants frequently engage in a compare and contrast
financial analysis of Oro Valley in comparison with competing communities. The proposed primary employer
incentive program will enable Oro Valley to 'catch-up' with the surrounding communities who are already providing
these incentives.
The Oro Valley Primary Employer Incentive program goals, its administration, employer and project qualifications,
proposed incentives, and other considerations are detailed in the attached program document. The
Council-approved Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS) for 2019-2024 further details what is
needed to protect and expand primary employers in the community. The Council incorporated several of the CEDS
recommendations into their Strategic Leadership Plan. If approved, the Oro Valley Town Council, Town Manager
and ED staff will implement the program in accordance with SLP Goal 1A: Expand Economic Vitality.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Fiscal impacts will be determined after negotiations are finalized by the Town Manager, on a project case-by-case
basis. In every Town Manager-approved project, a Council-approved contract is required. It should be noted that the
primary employer will earn the incentive (via its capital investment, job creation, etc.) before the incentive
reimbursements are realized back to that employer. Even with 100% incentive applications, the primary employer
will still generate direct, indirect and induced net new revenue in the community. The economic and fiscal impacts
will be prepared by an independent third party service provider and will be part of the final documentation prior to
Council-approved contract execution.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
This item is for presentation and discussion only.
Attachments
Proposed Primary Incentive Program
Primary Incentive Program Presentation
Town Manager’s Office
TOWN COUNCIL REPORT
DATE: June 12, 2020
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
THRU: Mary Jacobs, Town Manager
FROM: J.J. Johnston, CED Director
SUBJECT: Proposed Primary Employer Incentive Program
PURPOSE:
This report is to provide an advance look into primary employer incentive proposals we
will present to the Mayor and Council during a Study Session on July 1st.
DISCUSSION:
Please find attached our discussion draft of the proposed primary employer incentive
program.
Many of the major goals of the primary incentive program are already aligned:
Strategic Leadership Plan (SLP), Goal 1 A:
Implement strategies to improve opportunities to attract, grow and retain primary
employers AND expand local job opportunities.
Guiding Principle of the General Plan:
Grow the number of high quality employment opportunities.
The Council approved Comprehensive Economic Development Strategic (CEDS)
Plan for 2019-2024 details several opportunities regarding what is needed to attract
new long-term investment and financial sustainability. Foundational to accomplishing
this will be to continuously expand the community’s economic tax base. This will be
accomplished by bringing net new capital investments to generate direct, indirect and
induced positive impacts to the economy.
Both the CEDS and the Council approved SLP promote economic vitality and
competitiveness. The creation of new primary jobs will generate new payroll
expenditures that support local businesses. A strong and competitive primary
employer program will bring increased household spending, generate new sales and
Use Taxes, new research and development investments and innovation and
technological advancements.
Winning new primary employers is hyper competitive. Our economic development
team has generated dozens of active primary employer prospects and several are
requesting incentives. Prospects and site selectors compare/contrast Oro Valley to
other communities.
Oro Valley is without a primary employer incentive program which puts our economic
development program at a significant competitive disadvantage. Primary employers
are selecting neighboring communities. Our competitors are providing up to 100%
credit of construction sales tax and up to 100% reduction of fees. They are also
allowing reimbursements for employee relocation and negotiating reductions in impact
fees.
The proposed primary employer incentive program will enable Oro Valley to become
more competitive. It will help us retain, expand and attract new primary jobs. The
program elements will be detailed in the July 1st Study Session. We will speak to the
establishment of strict guidelines regarding the application and approval process.
The Town Council, Town Manager and Economic Development team will implement
the program in accordance with SLP Goal 1A (expand economic vitality), General Plan
Guiding Principle (grow number of high quality employment opportunities) and the
CEDS.
RECOMMENDATION / CONCLUSION
This report is for information only.
Attachment
DRAFT Primary Employer Incentive Program
Oro Valley Primary Employer Incentive Program
Goal
The goal of this incentive program is to enable long-term financial sustainability in Oro Valley
through the creation of new primary job opportunities and the generation of new capital
investment in Oro Valley. This program aims to encourage the expansion of existing businesses
and also to attracting new primary employers to the Town.
Administration
New capital investment revenues may be reimbursed to qualifying primary employers for
allowable expenses based upon the value of their economic impact to the Town of Oro Valley.
Once construction sales tax revenue has been collected, the incentive program allows for
reimbursement of eligible expenses up to the designated percentages that are outlined in this
document.
1. Each qualified primary employer project requesting reimbursement will prepare and
submit detailed information to the Town. This information will always include the primary
employer project type by NAICS code, the number of new primary employees and their
average salaries and wages along with a detailed list of their capital investments,
especially construction costs.
2. Town staff will confirm that the project qualifies for the program.
3. A 3rd Party Vendor analyzes the application to verify it is in compliance with the Arizona
Gift Clause (A.R.S. Const. Art. 9 & 7):
“[A] governmental expenditure does not violate the Gift Clause if (1) it has a
public purpose, and (2) in return for its expenditure, the governmental entity
receives consideration that “is not so inequitable and unreasonable that it
amounts to an abuse of discretion, thus providing a subsidy to the private entity.”
The Arizona Supreme Court’s interpretation of A.R.S. Const. Art. 9, § 7, (the “
Arizona Gift Clause”) highlights a requirement for there to be a quantifiable
benefit to government before payment of any kind can be made to private
business. The Turken court decision hinged on the second prong of the
Wistuber case test and determined that the “reliable way to determine whether
the private party has received a forbidden subsidy is to compare the public
expenditure to what the government receives under the contract. When
government payment is grossly disproportionate to what is received in return, the
payment violates the Gift Clause.” Turken v. Gordon,223 Ariz. 342, 224 P.3d
158 Ariz.,(2010); Citing Wistuber v. Paradise Valley Unified School District, 141
Ariz. 346, 687 P.2d 354 (1984).
4. Final application presented to the Town Manager (or designee) for approval.
5. Council-approved contract is signed.
Reimbursement amounts are identified below and reimbursements are aligned and restricted to
the amount of construction sales tax and related fees collected by the Town in association
with the project. Reimbursements must correspond to the following project investments, in
addition to the other requirements specified in this policy:
Construction Related Fees Collected
by the Town
Reimbursement
Up to $100,000 $0
$100,001 - $250,000 25% of allowable expenses
$250,001 - $500,000 50% of allowable expenses
$500,001 -$750,000 75% of allowable expenses
>$750,000 100% of allowable expenses
Minimum Primary Employer Qualifications
To qualify for this program, employers must:
• Invest $1 million in direct capital investment 1 in Oro Valley; Or
• Create at least 10 net new full-time primary employment job opportunities in Oro Valley
that pay at least median wage in that industry sector as determined by The University of
Arizona Eller College MAPAZDashboard 2
• And be a primary employer 3;
• An d cover at least 50% of employee health insurance premiums.
Incentives
Eligible employers can request reimbursement of the project’s construction sales tax and related
fees in accordance with the above table for any of the following expenses:
• Employee relocation expenses: An allowance of up to $3,000 per employee to assist
with the cost of relocating. Allowable relocation expenses are at the discretion of the
employer.
• Exterior building aesthetics: Expenses such as building façade or exterior features that
improve the appearance of the property. Projects must conform to Oro Valley design
standards.
• Renovation expenses: Costs associated with renovating and/or repurposing an existing
site for primary employer use by a new or expanding business.
• Job training: Expenses incurred for training employees, including interns and
apprentices.
• Sustainable development: Costs associated with investment in renewable energy and
sustainability best practices.
• Public infrastructure: Costs of constructing public infrastructure needed to access the
employer’s facilities.
• Impact fee reductions: Up to 100% reimbursement of impact fees.
Other Considerations
• In addition to reallocation of capital investment revenues for the qualified expenses
outlined above, Ordinance 97-27, which states that 1% of the total budget for every new
construction project or expansion of existing projects must be allocated for public art,
may be capped at $100,000.
1 https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/capital-investment.asp
2 https://mapazdashboard.arizona.edu/workforce-demographics/occupational-wages/occupational-wages
3 https://www.montroseedc.org/122/Primary-Employer-Definition
• The Town of Oro Valley may offer up to 100% reduction on any permit and plan review
fees and an expedited permitting process. This incentive may be enhanced at the Town
Manager’s discretion.
• Council-approved contract is required after negotiations are finalized by Town Manager.
• By working with state and regional partners on behalf of new and expanding businesses,
the Town will help facilitate the use of Federal, State, and Regional Incentive Options,
including:
o The federal Work Opportunity Tax Credit (WOTC) is available to employers for
hiring individuals from certain targeted groups. More information on the WOTC is
available here.
o Foreign Trade Zone (FTZ) #174 encompasses all of Pima County, including the
Town of Oro Valley. Sun Corridor Inc. is the administrator of FTZ #174 and can
provide additional information on how to best utilize this incentive. Information
found here.
o The Arizona Commerce Authority (ACA) offers several incentive options to
new and expanding businesses in the State of Arizona. The ACA has programs
focused on tax relief, talent and training, innovation and entrepreneurship, small
businesses, manufacturing, rural economic development, and international trade.
More information is available on their website.
o ARIZONA@WORK Pima County One-Stop Workforce Development System
offers a nationally recognized job training program to prepare individuals for
quality jobs. More information about the organization and its programming can be
found here.
o Tucson Electric Power (TEP) is the Town’s electricity provider and offers
discounted rates to new or renovated construction for five years after completion
of the project. Information on TEP’s economic development incentives can be
found here.
o Southwest Gas is the Town’s gas provider and offers rebates on efforts made to
reduce gas consumption. More information can be found here.
Proposed Oro Valley
Primary Employer Incentive Program
Town Council
July 1, 2020
Purpose of Proposed Primary Incentive Program
Attract new long-term investment and financial
sustainability
Expand economic/tax base—ensuring financial
sustainability.
SLP Goal 1A—implement strategies to improve
opportunities to attract, grow and retain primary
employers AND expand local job opportunities.
Guiding Principle of the General Plan--grow the
number of high quality employment opportunities.
Town Council Approved CEDS
According to the International Economic Development Council:
Economic Development Defined
“Economic development is the intentional practice
of improving a community’s economic well -being
and quality of life. It includes a broad range of
activities to attract, create, and retain jobs, and to
foster a resilient, pro -growth tax base and an
inclusive economy. The practice of economic
development comprises of a collaborative effort
involving industry, government and myriad
community stakeholders.”
Economic Base
Tax Base
Revenues Expenditures
Service Delivery
Population
Communities Need Economic Stability
What are Primary Employers
Produce more goods and services than can be
consumed by the local economy
Export goods and services
Import net new revenues
Infuse new income into the local economy
Increase employment opportunities and new
disposable income
Economic Impact
New capital investments
Impacts—direct and indirect (RIMS)
Direct, indirect and induced
New primary jobs that generate new payroll
expenditures that support local businesses
Examples of new primary employer impacts generated by
new business development and job creation in the
community:
Economic Impact (cont.)
Increased household spending
New sales and Use Tax Generations
New R & D, innovation and technological
advancements
Targeted Technologies
Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR), AI, 3D, I of T, VR
Bioinformatics
3PL and Redundant Supply Chains
5G Technology and expanded IT capabilities within
commercial business corridors
Precision Cancer Diagnostics
Research and Development/Academic and Commercial
Tele Health/Tele Medicine/Tele Veterinarian Services
Translational Genomics
Local
Primary
Employers
Targeted Industries
Advanced business services
Aerospace and defense
Engineering
Environmental Sciences
Information technology/software
Life and bio-sciences
Research & Development
Ubiquitous Mobile Super Computing
Why New Competitive Tools Needed
Winning new primary employers hyper competitive
Prospects and site selectors compare/contrast OV to other
communities
OV only community in region without primary employer
incentive program
ED team has generated dozens of primary employer
prospects; several requesting incentives
Absence of incentive program cited as major disadvantage by
prospects and site selectors
Approximately 8000 adult workers leave OV daily to work in
other communities
Limited and comparatively poor selection of shovel ready
sites means OV needs to be competitive
Incentives Offered in Region
Up to 100% credit of construction sales tax
Up to 100% reduction of fees
Allowance for employee relocation
Impact fee reductions
Eligible primary employers can request up to 100%
reimbursement of construction sales tax collected for project for
the following eligible expenditures:
Summary of Potential Incentives
Employee relocation: Up to $3,000/employee with
criteria
Job training: Employees, interns, apprentices
Sustainable development: Investment in renewable
energy and sustainability best practices
Public infrastructure: Constructed in public ROW
Renovation expenses: Repurpose existing site for new or
expanding primary employer
Summary of Potential Incentives (cont.)
TOV administrative incentives
Federal, State, Regional Incentive Programs
Exterior Building Improvements
1% Public Art Requirement: not to exceed $100,000
Impact fees offsets: Up to 100% reimbursement
To qualify, primary employers must:
Primary Employer Qualifications
Invest $1 million in direct capital investment in Oro
Valley;OR
Create at least 10 net new full-time primary employment
job opportunities in Oro Valley that pay at least median
wage in that industry sector as determined by UA Eller
College MAP AZ Dashboard or appropriate government
sourced ED data.
AND be a primary employer;
AND cover at least 50% of employee health insurance
premiums
Limited to the total amount of construction sales tax collected by the Town in
association with the project.
Reimbursement Amounts
Construction Sales Tax Collected Reimbursement
Up to $100,000 $0
$100,001 -$250,000 25% of allowable expenses
$250,001 -$500,000 50% of allowable expenses
$500,001 -$750,000 75% of allowable expenses
>$750,000 100% of allowable expenses
Proposed Process
Primary employer applies for Incentive Program
Town ED staff confirms that the project qualifies for
the program
Independent 3rd Party analysis of application to
verify it is in compliance with the Arizona Gift
Clause
Town Manager or designee negotiates incentives
Subject to Town Council approved contract
Proposed Primary Employer Incentive Program:
Summary
Enables Oro Valley to become more competitive
Helps retain, expand and attract new primary jobs
Establishes strict guidelines about the use of
incentives
Supports Town Council Strategic Leadership Plan
and CEDS
Town Council approval of all incentives required
Questions?
Town Council Regular and Study Session 2.
Meeting Date:07/01/2020
Submitted By:Amanda Jacobs, Town Manager's Office
Department:Town Manager's Office
SUBJECT:
PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION REGARDING THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY'S PROPOSED ANNEXATION
STRATEGY
RECOMMENDATION:
This item is for information and discussion only.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
One of the objectives in the Town Council FY 19/20 - FY 20/21 Strategic Leadership Plan is to develop a
comprehensive annexation blueprint to guide the Town's strategic growth and economic expansion.
Annexation is the process by which municipalities incorporate new territory into their municipal boundaries, and is
one of the most lasting actions a city or town can take. In addition to benefits to local businesses, annexation may
bring additional services and public funds to invest in the community. Potential additional revenues include sales
tax, bed tax, and a portion of state-shared revenues, such as state income tax, highway user revenue, vehicle
license tax and state sales tax. These additional revenues should ensure services, such as police, parks &
recreation and transportation, are continued at current or improved levels of service.
The purpose of the Oro Valley Annexation Strategy is to identify, prioritize and prepare for future annexations that
are economically beneficial to the Town while also considering the impacts to residents and the social, aesthetic
and environmental quality of the Town . The proposed Annexation Strategy is a reference document and a blueprint
to facilitating future decisions regarding annexation. It is intended to be used by Town staff and the Town Council, in
conjunction with the voter-ratified Your Voice Our Future General Plan, to gain a thorough understanding of the
implications of annexations and provide a framework for proceeding with annexations that are beneficial. The
following goals identified in the General Plan will be used when considering future annexations:
Develop a diversified and robust economic base to support long-term economic stability. (Economy Focus)
Maintain financial and economic stability and sustainability. (Community Goals)
Provide the community with a wide range of services, amenities, shopping and dining opportunities and
housing types that meet the needs of current and future residents. (Community Goals)
Provide diverse transportation choices that are safe, user-friendly, efficient and accessible, that maintain the
lifestyle of residents, and that support employees, visitors and the local economy. (Development Goals)
Support the development of diverse housing types within the community. (Community Policy)
On February 5, 2003, the Town Council adopted a policy that updated the established guidelines for future
annexations to ensure they are logical, practical, financially feasible, and in the best interest of the Town
(Resolution No. (R)03-06 - Attachment 1). This Annexation Strategy is intended to consolidate and replace all
previous policies and resolutions into a single, comprehensive document with the recommendation of reviewing the
strategy every five years.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
The Town was originally incorporated in 1974 with a small 2.4 square mile area, and through a series of
The Town was originally incorporated in 1974 with a small 2.4 square mile area, and through a series of
annexations since then, has resulted in the community that exists today. All but three of the 20 subsequent
annexations since incorporation have been less than three square miles, 12 of which were less than one square
mile. The largest annexation incorporated nearly 13 square miles, an area that includes most of the Rancho Vistoso
planned area development. A copy of the Annexation History can be found on page 5 of the Proposed Annexation
Strategy (Attachment 2).
Future annexations will continue to be carried out in accordance with state law, which includes:
The annexed area must be contiguous to (directly bordering on) a current Town limit for at least 300 feet.
The annexed area must be at least 200 feet in width in all places.
The annexed area's length (extending out from the Town limit) may be no more than twice the distance of its
width (adjacent to the Town limit). For example, if the area is contiguous for 300 feet, the annexation can
extend outward for up to 600 feet from the current Town limit.
More than 50% of property owners in a proposed annexation area, representing more than 50% of the
assessed valuation of that area, must sign a petition in favor of annexation in order for it to be successful.
Determining priority areas for annexation is necessary in order to identify for the community which areas are most
beneficial for Oro Valley. In order to evaluate those areas and determine priorities, the following criteria were
developed by which opportunities would be assessed:
The Town’s ability to provide the full range of Town services and facilities, and the ability for the area to
financially support those services.
The potential of the area to accommodate job growth.
The opportunity to incorporate existing commercial enterprises that would generate revenues for the Town.
The opportunity to control urban growth using Town development standards in areas where future
development is likely.
The importance of the area in terms of key multi-modal transportation or open space corridor.
Creation of logical Town boundaries and service areas.
The perceived level of support for annexation by affected property owners/residents.
The area’s importance in terms of it being a gateway to the Town.
Consistency with the Town’s Your Voice Our Future General Plan goals and policies.
Using the above criteria, the priority areas that Oro Valley will focus include both developed and undeveloped
(vacant) land. Annexation of developed residential areas allows the Town to capture some state-shared revenue
that those residents pay to the state that are returned only to incorporated cities and towns based on population. In
some cases, these areas serve as connectors to potential future annexations. Additionally, annexing commercial
areas allows the Town to collect sales taxes and, in some areas, bed taxes. Annexing land that is primarily
undeveloped enables the Town to properly plan for future development, including the phasing of infrastructure. Staff
has proposed four priority areas for future annexation, which can be found on pages 9 - 13 in the proposed
Annexation Strategy. Annexation has been an important tool for the Town of Oro Valley since it was incorporated in
1974. The Town has increased its corporate boundaries by 32.52 square miles through 48 annexations and has
gained a diversified and robust economic base. Continuing to annex developed and vacant land will provide Oro
Valley with a wide range of services, amenities, housing, shopping and dining opportunities that meet the needs of
current and future residents, thereby maintaining the financial and economic stability of the community.
Next Steps
Based on Council's feedback, the Annexation Strategy will be considered as a resolution for adoption at a future
regular Town Council meeting.
FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUGGESTED MOTION:
This item is for presentation and discussion only.
Attachments
Resolution 03-06
DRAFT Annexation Strategy
DRAFT Annexation Strategy
Proposed Annexation Strategy - staff presentation
I
RESOLUTION NO. (R)03- 06
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY,ARIZONA,AMENDING POLICY FOR
ANNEXATION OF UNINCORPORATED LAND AND MAKING SUCH
DOCUMENT A PUBLIC RECORD; AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION
NO. (R)95-22
WHEREAS,the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona has in the past, annexed unincorporated
areas into the town limits, and
WHEREAS,the Mayor and Council desire to update and revise the policy of established
guidelines for future annexations to ensure that any such annexation will be logical,
practical, financially feasible and in the best interest of the town's present and future
residents.
NOW THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND TOWN
COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY,ARIZONA:
That certain document known as "Town of Oro Valley Policy for the Annexation of
Unincorporated Land: dated February 5, 2003,which is attached herewith and labeled as
Exhibit A", three copies of which are on file in the office of the Town Clerk, is hereby
adopted, declared to be a public record, and said copies are ordered to remain on file with
the Town Clerk.
That this resolution shall supersede Resolution No. (R)95-22, which adopted a previous
annexation policy, and Resolution No. (R)95-22 is hereby rescinded.
PASSED,ADOPTED AND APPROVED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of
Oro Valley, Arizona this 5th day of February 2003.
Paul H. Loomis,Mayor
ATTEST:
i ,
Cas, dzzo,Le-e;
Kat E. Cuvelier, Town Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
64.41/4# 1/
Dan L. Dudley, To n Attorney
s•
Exhibit"A"
Town of Oro Valley, Arizona
Policy for the Annexation of Unincorporated Land
February 5, 2003
The annexation of unincorporated areas of Pima County of the Town of Oro Valley,
Arizona shall consider the following guidelines:
1) Pursue the filling out and squaring off of the town limits. Strive toward a
configuration for the town limits which eliminates county islands and peninsulas
and yields an identifiable, manageable boundary for the town.
2) Areas to be considered shall be prioritized as to quantifiable benefit to the Town.
3) Require the submittal of a fiscal impact analysis for both undeveloped (rural) and
developed properties, the level of detail and contents of which may vary with the
intensity or complexity of the proposed or existing use of the land. Such analysis
is required, regardless of who initiates the annexation process.
4) Future annexations of the Town shall be generally consistent with the policies
and the planning area of the Town's adopted General Plan.
5) Consider a proactive stance on annexations initiated in areas deemed most
beneficial to the Town as indicated by town-prepared studies and/or professional
regional studies.
6) Lands annexed by the Town shall have existing, ordinanced zoning translated to
Oro Valley districts in conformance with state law and to densities and uses no
greater than those permitted by the zoning ordinance of the governing jurisdiction
immediately before annexation.
7) The Oro Valley Planning and Zoning Commission shall review any proposed
annexation outside the General Plan Planning Area. The Commission shall
forward a recommendation to the Town Council within 30 days of the initial
hearing on the proposed annexation.
8) Pre-annexation/development agreements shall be considered by the Planning and
Zoning Commission and Town Council where appropriate during the annexation
process with a five year limitation then subject to review at the end of the five
year period.
9) That the Mayor and Council may appoint a Council Member to serve on the
annexation team.
Proposed Annexation Strategy
July 1, 2020
Presented by:
Amanda Jacobs, Strategic Initiatives Manager
Joe Andrews, Chief Civil Deputy Town Attorney
Overview
Proposed Annexation Strategy
What is Annexation?
Annexation History
Update 2003 Annexation Policy
Annexation Criteria
Priority Areas
Annexation Tools
What is Annexation?
Proposed Annexation Strategy
Process by which municipalities incorporate new territory
into their municipal boundaries
State Law
Proposed Annexation Strategy
Territory to be annexed shall adjoin the boundary
of the annexing city or town for at least 300 feet
Contiguity -ARS §9-471.H
Proposed Annexation Strategy
The parcel to be annexed must be a minimum of 200
feet in width at all points, exclusive of rights-of-way
and roadways
The length of the parcel is measured from where the
territory adjoins the annexing city or town to the
furthest point of the parcel and cannot be more than
twice the maximum width of the annexed territory
The only exception is when a property is surrounded
by the jurisdiction on at least 3 sides
Size and Shape -ARS §9-471.K
Proposed Annexation Strategy
A city or town may annex only unincorporated
territory (Backed up in Case Law)
Annexations may cross County Boundaries
Annexations of County Parks requires a special
process and need County Board of Supervisors
Approval
State Land with Special Procedure
Federal Lands -No Special Process necessary
What Can Be Annexed? Unincorporated County Only
Proposed Annexation Strategy
A city or town may not annex territory if, as a
result of the annexation, unincorporated territory
is completely surrounded by the annexing city or
town. However, annexation of existing County
Islands is allowed.
New Legislation SB 1303 proposes prohibition if
County island is formed between two
municipalities upon annexation
What Cannot Be Annexed? Create County Island
Petitions
Proposed Annexation Strategy
Ownership/Valuation ARS §9-471.A.4 (Signatures);
Petitions must be signed by the owners of one-half or more in value of the
real and personal property; and
Petitions must be signed by more than one-half of the persons owning real
and personal property
Increased corporate
boundaries by 32.52
square miles
48 successful annexations
Annexation History
Proposed Annexation Strategy
Update 2003 Annexation Policy
Proposed Annexation Strategy
Replace and update with comprehensive strategy
Square off of town limits
Fiscal Impact Analysis
Consistent with General Plan Policies
Five-year limitation and appointments
Annexation Criteria
Proposed Annexation Strategy
Consistency with the Town’s Your Voice Our Future General Plan
Creation of logical Town boundaries and service areas
Maintain financial and economic stability and sustainability
Prioritize incorporation of existing commercial businesses
Utilize Town development standards
Support for annexation by affected property owners/residents
Westward Look Resort
Casas Adobes Plaza
Tangerine 880
Priority Area 1: Current
Proposed Annexation Strategy
Remaining two commercial
corners at Ina/Oracle (NE
and SE)
Residential area adjacent
to Westward Look
Honeywell
Priority Area 2: Near-Term
Proposed Annexation Strategy
Foothills Mall
Pima Community College
Omni Tucson National
Residential
Nearby commercial and
residential areas
Priority Area 3: Mid-Term
Proposed Annexation Strategy
Arroyo Grande
Tangerine/Moore
Shannon/Thornydale
La Cholla/Shannon
Priority Area 4: Long-Term
Proposed Annexation Strategy
Annexation Tools
Proposed Annexation Strategy
Value proposition
Pre-Annexation Agreements
Taxes
Next Steps
Proposed Annexation Strategy
Update Proposed Annexation Strategy, based on Council
feedback
Present resolution for adoption at future Town Council
meeting
Proposed Annexation Strategy
Questions?
Town Council Regular and Study Session 3.
Meeting Date:07/01/2020
Submitted By:Michael Dyckman, Finance
Department:Finance
SUBJECT:
DISCUSSION REGARDING THE TOWN'S FISCAL YEAR 2020/21 BUDGET
RECOMMENDATION:
N/A
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
On June 17, 2020, the Town adopted the Tentative Budget and expenditure limitation for fiscal year 2020/21 in the
amount of $105,435,626. The item presented tonight is to allow for further discussion Council to help direct
staff regarding final changes for the 2020/21 budget prior to final adoption scheduled for July 15, 2020.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUGGESTED MOTION:
This item is for information only.
Attachments
FY 2020/21 Tentative Budget
Fund Summaries
OFFICIAL BUDGET FORMS
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
Fiscal Year 2021
4/19 Arizona Auditor General's Office Official City/Town Budget Forms
Schedule B—Tax Levy and Tax Rate Information
Schedule G—Full-Time Employees and Personnel Compensation
Schedule C—Revenues Other Than Property Taxes
Schedule D—Other Financing Sources/(Uses) and Interfund Transfers
Schedule E—Expenditures/Expenses by Fund
Schedule F—Expenditures/Expenses by Department (as applicable)
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Fiscal Year 2021
Resolution for the Adoption of the Budget
Schedule A—Summary Schedule of Estimated Revenues and Expenditures/Expenses
4/19 Arizona Auditor General's Office Official City/Town Budget Forms
Fiscal YearGeneral FundSpecial Revenue Fund Debt Service FundCapital Projects Fund Permanent FundEnterprise Funds AvailableInternal Service Funds Total All Funds2020 Adopted/Adjusted Budgeted Expenditures/Expenses* E140,706,766 11,314,540 1,468,201 26,156,755 0 26,858,482 4,514,972 111,019,7162020 Actual Expenditures/Expenses** E238,693,390 9,943,162 1,376,102 18,672,124 0 21,746,391 3,617,475 94,048,6442021 Fund Balance/Net Position at July 1*** 317,157,343 1,227,740 197,503 20,662,679 0 11,160,760 1,107,185 51,513,2102021 Primary Property Tax LevyB4002021 Secondary Property Tax Levy B502021 Estimated Revenues Other than Property Taxes C643,230,386 11,126,539 318,283 5,729,445 0 17,678,500 4,207,654 82,290,8072021 Other Financing Sources D70 0 0 0 0 2,942,995 0 2,942,9952021 Other Financing (Uses) D80 0 00000 02021 Interfund Transfers In D9120,000 0 1,079,200 17,617,021 0 0 0 18,816,2212021 Interfund Transfers (Out) D101,839,520 278,302 0 14,492,678 0 2,205,721 0 18,816,2212021 Reduction for Amounts Not Available:11LESS: Amounts for Future Debt Retirement:89,82589,825Future Capital Projects287,153 12,821,277 7,495,710 20,604,140Maintained Fund Balance for Financial Stability9,792,318 217,918607,185 10,617,421002021 Total Financial Resources Available1248,875,891 11,570,906 1,505,161 16,695,190 0 22,080,824 4,707,654 105,435,6262021Budgeted Expenditures/ExpensesE1348,875,891 11,570,906 1,505,161 16,695,190 0 22,080,824 4,707,654 105,435,626EXPENDITURE LIMITATION COMPARISON 2020 20211Budgeted expenditures/expenses111,019,716$ 105,435,626$ 2Add/subtract: estimated net reconciling items3Budgeted expenditures/expenses adjusted for reconciling items 111,019,716 105,435,626 4Less: estimated exclusions5Amount subject to the expenditure limitation111,019,716$ 105,435,626$ 6EEC expenditure limitation$ $ X******Amounts on this line represent Fund Balance/Net Position amounts except for amounts not in spendable form (e.g., prepaids and inventories) or legally or contractually required to be maintained intact (e.g., principal of a permanent fund).SchFUNDSIncludes Expenditure/Expense Adjustments Approved in the current year from Schedule E. The city/town does not levy property taxes and does not have special assessment districts for which property taxes are levied. Therefore, Schedule B has been omitted.TOWN OF ORO VALLEYSummary Schedule of Estimated Revenues and Expenditures/ExpensesFiscal Year 2021Includes actual amounts as of the date the proposed budget was prepared, adjusted for estimated activity for the remainder of the fiscal year. 4/19 Arizona Auditor General's OfficeSCHEDULE AOfficial City/Town Budget Forms
ESTIMATED
REVENUES
ACTUAL
REVENUES*
ESTIMATED
REVENUES
2020 2020 2021
GENERAL FUND
Local taxes
Local Sales Tax $ 18,686,206 $ 18,274,146 $ 17,513,304
Cable Franchise Tax 625,000 625,000 615,000
Licenses and permits
Licenses 206,300 206,300 202,500
Permits 1,624,818 1,929,922 1,246,500
Fees 153,000 198,250 143,500
Intergovernmental
State/County Shared 12,530,715 12,185,307 13,194,438
State Grants 75,000 75,000 75,000
Federal Grants 549,543 364,819 5,790,969
Reimbursements 1,585,000 1,285,000 1,580,000
Other 90,000 100,000 92,000
Charges for services
Reimbursements 152,400 153,000 157,400
Fees 1,369,700 903,211 1,061,150
Other 1,030,539 1,031,539 1,021,125
Fines and forfeits
Fines 120,000 110,000 125,000
Interest on investments
Interest Income 150,000 504,929 150,000
Miscellaneous
Miscellaneous 288,000 316,926 262,500
Total General Fund $ 39,236,221 $ 38,263,349 $ 43,230,386
*
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
Revenues Other Than Property Taxes
Fiscal Year 2021
Includes actual revenues recognized on the modified accrual or accrual basis as of the date the proposed budget was
prepared, plus estimated revenues for the remainder of the fiscal year.
SOURCE OF REVENUES
4/19 Arizona Auditor General's Office SCHEDULE C Official City/Town Budget Forms
ESTIMATED
REVENUES
ACTUAL
REVENUES*
ESTIMATED
REVENUES
2020 2020 2021
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
Revenues Other Than Property Taxes
Fiscal Year 2021
SOURCE OF REVENUES
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
Highway User Revenue Fund
Highway User Fuel Tax $ 3,604,407 $ 3,513,856 $ 3,458,929
Permits 50 25,000
Interest Income 3,168 5,000
State Grants 180,000 180,000 210,000
Other 1,500 63,827 2,000
$ 3,785,907 $ 3,760,901 $ 3,700,929
Seizures & Forfeitures
Seizures & Forfeitures $ 325,000 $ 33,000 $ 325,000
Interest Income 6,100 2,000
$ 325,000 $ 39,100 $ 327,000
Community Center Fund
Local Sales Tax $ 2,478,552 $ 2,300,962 $ 2,492,960
Charges for Services 4,250,551 3,714,706 4,460,148
Other 19,502 19,502 145,502
$ 6,748,605 $ 6,035,170 $ 7,098,610
Total Special Revenue Funds $ 10,859,512 $ 9,835,171 $ 11,126,539
* Includes actual revenues recognized on the modified accrual or accrual basis as of the date the proposed budget was
prepared, plus estimated revenues for the remainder of the fiscal year.
4/19 Arizona Auditor General's Office SCHEDULE C Official City/Town Budget Forms
ESTIMATED
REVENUES
ACTUAL
REVENUES*
ESTIMATED
REVENUES
2020 2020 2021
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
Revenues Other Than Property Taxes
Fiscal Year 2021
SOURCE OF REVENUES
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
Municipal Debt Service Fund
Federal Grants $ 43,509 $ 43,509 $ 39,245
Interest Income 5,000 18,639 5,000
Miscellaneous 100,000 104,000 100,000
$ 148,509 $ 166,148 $ 144,245
Oracle Road Improvement District
Special Assessments $ 176,912 168,630 $ 174,038
$ 176,912 $ 168,630 $ 174,038
Total Debt Service Funds $ 325,421 $ 334,778 $ 318,283
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS
Alternative Water Resources Development Impact Fee Fund
Development Impact Fees $ 1,276,190 $ 1,644,000 $
Interest Income 40,000 69,271
$ 1,316,190 $ 1,713,271 $
Potable Water System Development Impact Fee Fund
Development Impact Fees $ 635,728 $ 818,000 $
Interest Income 36,800 63,729
$ 672,528 $ 881,729 $
Water Resources Development Impact Fee Fund
Development Impact Fees $ $ $ 1,889,411
Interest Income 182,000
$ $ $ 2,071,411
Townwide Roadway Development Impact Fee Fund
Development Impact Fees $ 541,430 $ 525,095 $ 314,320
Interest Income 30,000 29,387 30,000
$ 571,430 $ 554,482 $ 344,320
Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Fund
Development Impact Fees $ 244,816 $ 240,025 $ 309,668
Interest Income 9,480 5,000
$ 244,816 $ 249,505 $ 314,668
Police Impact Fee Fund
Development Impact Fees $ 111,074 $ 104,951 $ 95,911
Interest Income 1,600
$ 111,074 $ 106,551 $ 95,911
Capital Fund
Miscellaneous $ 536,900 $ 536,900 $ 883,010
State Grants 100,000 100,000 117,000
Federal Grants 229,500 229,500
$ 866,400 $ 866,400 $ 1,000,010
PAG/RTA Fund
State Grants $ 10,300,000 $ 11,716,553 $ 1,875,000
Other 28,125 28,125 28,125
Miscellaneous 198,401
$ 10,328,125 $ 11,943,079 $ 1,903,125
Total Capital Projects Funds $ 14,110,563 $ 16,315,017 $ 5,729,445
* Includes actual revenues recognized on the modified accrual or accrual basis as of the date the proposed budget was
prepared, plus estimated revenues for the remainder of the fiscal year.
4/19 Arizona Auditor General's Office SCHEDULE C Official City/Town Budget Forms
ESTIMATED
REVENUES
ACTUAL
REVENUES*
ESTIMATED
REVENUES
2020 2020 2021
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
Revenues Other Than Property Taxes
Fiscal Year 2021
SOURCE OF REVENUES
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
Water Utility Fund
Water Sales $ 13,714,000 $ 13,434,000 $ 13,078,000
Charges for Services 3,262,700 3,219,700 3,086,500
Interest Income 63,000 130,000 75,000
$ 17,039,700 $ 16,783,700 $ 16,239,500
Stormwater Utility Fund
Charges for Services $ 1,422,000 $ 1,438,000 $ 1,438,000
Interest Income 1,000 17,852 1,000
State Grants 2,100,000
Miscellaneous 10
$ 3,523,000 $ 1,455,862 $ 1,439,000
Total Enterprise Funds $ 20,562,700 $ 18,239,562 $ 17,678,500
* Includes actual revenues recognized on the modified accrual or accrual basis as of the date the proposed budget was
prepared, plus estimated revenues for the remainder of the fiscal year.
4/19 Arizona Auditor General's Office SCHEDULE C Official City/Town Budget Forms
ESTIMATED
REVENUES
ACTUAL
REVENUES*
ESTIMATED
REVENUES
2020 2020 2021
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
Revenues Other Than Property Taxes
Fiscal Year 2021
SOURCE OF REVENUES
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
Benefit Self Insurance Fund
Miscellaneous $ 4,014,972 $ 3,988,152 $ 4,207,654
$ 4,014,972 $ 3,988,152 $ 4,207,654
Total Internal Service Funds $ 4,014,972 $ 3,988,152 $ 4,207,654
TOTAL ALL FUNDS $ 89,109,389 $ 86,976,029 $ 82,290,807
* Includes actual revenues recognized on the modified accrual or accrual basis as of the date the proposed budget was
prepared, plus estimated revenues for the remainder of the fiscal year.
4/19 Arizona Auditor General's Office SCHEDULE C Official City/Town Budget Forms
FUND SOURCES (USES)IN (OUT)
GENERAL FUND
Transfer from Community Center Fund $ $ $ 120,000 $
Transfer to Capital Fund 1,021,143
Transfer to Debt Service Fund 815,377
Transfer to Oracle Rd Improvement District Fund 3,000
Total General Fund $ $ $ 120,000 $ 1,839,520
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
Community Center Fund $ $ $ $ 278,302
Total Special Revenue Funds $ $ $ $ 278,302
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
Municipal Debt Service Fund $ $ $ 1,076,200 $
Oracle Rd Improvement District Fund 3,000
Total Debt Service Funds $ $ $ 1,079,200 $
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS
Capital Fund $ $ $ 1,021,143 $
Police Impact Fee Fund 100,000
Alt Water Resources Impact Fee Fund 8,611,958
Potable Water System Impact Fee Fund 5,780,720
Water Resources Impact Fee Fund 16,595,878
Total Capital Projects Funds $ $ $ 17,617,021 $ 14,492,678
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
Water Utility Fund $ 2,942,995 $ $ $ 2,205,721
Total Enterprise Funds $ 2,942,995 $ $ $ 2,205,721
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
$$$$
Total Internal Service Funds $$$$
TOTAL ALL FUNDS $ 2,942,995 $ $ 18,816,221 $ 18,816,221
2021 2021
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
Other Financing Sources/(Uses) and Interfund Transfers
Fiscal Year 2021
OTHER FINANCING INTERFUND TRANSFERS
4/19 Arizona Auditor General's Office SCHEDULE D Official City/Town Budget Forms
ADOPTED
BUDGETED
EXPENDITURES/
EXPENSES
EXPENDITURE/
EXPENSE
ADJUSTMENTS
APPROVED
ACTUAL
EXPENDITURES/
EXPENSES*
BUDGETED
EXPENDITURES/
EXPENSES
FUND/DEPARTMENT 2020 2020 2020 2021
GENERAL FUND
Administrative Services $ 4,648,370 $ $ 4,540,359 $
Human Resources 457,347
Innovation and Strategy 3,846,018
Finance 832,888
Clerk 366,336 361,076 428,524
Community and Economic Development 3,039,421 2,787,207 2,779,661
Council 206,001 206,001 197,019
General Administration 2,590,400 2,594,923 4,751,466
Legal 874,057 874,057 870,592
Magistrate Court 923,561 912,169 864,826
Town Manager's Office 1,314,145 1,294,364 1,028,734
Parks and Recreation 3,808,366 3,497,763 3,478,517
Police 17,448,615 16,993,985 17,051,408
Public Works 4,826,507 4,631,486 4,898,891
Contingency Reserve 841,325 (180,338)7,390,000
Total General Fund $ 40,887,104 $(180,338)$ 38,693,390 $ 48,875,891
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
Highway User Revenue Fund $ 4,213,739 $ $ 4,014,875 $ 4,066,213
Seizures and Forfeitures 372,883 59,593 327,000
Community Center Fund 6,727,918 5,868,694 7,177,693
Total Special Revenue Funds $ 11,314,540 $ $ 9,943,162 $ 11,570,906
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
Municipal Debt Service Fund $ 1,282,049 $ $ 1,200,228 $ 1,325,445
Oracle Rd. Improvement District Fund 186,152 175,874 179,716
Total Debt Service Funds $ 1,468,201 $ $ 1,376,102 $ 1,505,161
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS
Townwide Roadway Impact Fee Fund $ 3,010,000 $ $ 1,016,000 $ 2,110,000
Alt Water Resources Impact Fee Fund 2,859,800 1,227,558
Potable Water System Impact Fee Fund 1,435,996 445,996
Water Resources Dev Impact Fee Fund 6,981,099
Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Fund 781,806 100,000 995,000
Police Impact Fee Fund 764,149 (650,000)110,000 101,035
General Government Impact Fee Fund 3,580
Recreation In Lieu Fee Fund 15,718 16,004
Capital Fund 3,315,100 830,338 3,857,616 3,994,666
PAG/RTA Fund 10,790,268 11,914,954 2,497,386
Community Center Bond Fund 3,000,000
Total Capital Projects Funds $ 25,976,417 $ 180,338 $ 18,672,124 $ 16,695,190
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
Water Utility Enterprise Fund $ 22,810,077 $ $ 20,292,274 $ 20,273,074
Stormwater Utility Enterprise Fund 4,048,405 1,454,117 1,807,750
Total Enterprise Funds $ 26,858,482 $ $ 21,746,391 $ 22,080,824
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
Benefit Self Insurance Fund $ 4,514,972 $ $ 3,617,475 $ 4,707,654
Total Internal Service Funds $ 4,514,972 $ $ 3,617,475 $ 4,707,654
TOTAL ALL FUNDS $ 111,019,716 $ $ 94,048,644 $ 105,435,626
*
Expenditures/Expenses by Fund
Fiscal Year 2021
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
Includes actual expenditures/expenses recognized on the modified accrual or accrual basis as of the date the proposed budget was
prepared, plus estimated expenditures/expenses for the remainder of the fiscal year.
4/19 Arizona Auditor General's Office SCHEDULE E Official City/Town Budget Forms
ADOPTED
BUDGETED
EXPENDITURES/
EXPENSES
EXPENDITURE/
EXPENSE
ADJUSTMENTS
APPROVED
ACTUAL
EXPENDITURES/
EXPENSES*
BUDGETED
EXPENDITURES/
EXPENSES
2020 2020 2020 2021
Administrative Services
General Fund $ 4,648,370 $ $ 4,540,359 $
Department Total $ 4,648,370 $ $ 4,540,359 $
Human Resources
General Fund $ $ $ $ 457,347
Department Total $ $ $ $ 457,347
Innovation & Strategy
General Fund $ $ $ $ 3,846,018
Department Total $ $ $ $ 3,846,018
Finance
General Fund $ $ $ $ 832,888
Department Total $ $ $ $ 832,888
Clerk
General Fund $ 366,336 $ $ 361,076 $ 428,524
Department Total $ 366,336 $ $ 361,076 $ 428,524
Community & Economic Development
General Fund $ 3,039,421 $ $ 2,787,207 $ 2,779,661
Department Total $ 3,039,421 $ $ 2,787,207 $ 2,779,661
Council
General Fund $ 206,001 $ $ 206,001 $ 197,019
Department Total $ 206,001 $ $ 206,001 $ 197,019
General Administration
General Fund $ 2,590,400 $ $ 2,594,923 $ 4,751,466
General Fund - Contingency Reserve 841,325 (180,338)7,390,000
Municipal Debt Service Fund 1,282,049 1,200,228 1,325,445
Oracle Rd. Improvement District Fund 186,152 175,874 179,716
Benefit Self Insurance Fund 4,514,972 3,617,475 4,707,654
General Government Impact Fee Fund 3,580
Capital Fund 3,315,100 830,338 3,857,616 3,994,666
Department Total $ 12,733,578 $ 650,000 $ 11,446,116 $ 22,348,947
Expenditures/Expenses by Department
Fiscal Year 2021
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
DEPARTMENT/FUND
4/19 Arizona Auditor General's Office SCHEDULE F Official City/Town Budget Forms
ADOPTED
BUDGETED
EXPENDITURES/
EXPENSES
EXPENDITURE/
EXPENSE
ADJUSTMENTS
APPROVED
ACTUAL
EXPENDITURES/
EXPENSES*
BUDGETED
EXPENDITURES/
EXPENSES
2020 2020 2020 2021
Expenditures/Expenses by Department
Fiscal Year 2021
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
DEPARTMENT/FUND
Legal
General Fund $ 874,057 $ $ 874,057 $ 870,592
Department Total $ 874,057 $ $ 874,057 $ 870,592
Magistrate Court
General Fund $ 923,561 $ $ 912,169 $ 864,826
Department Total $ 923,561 $ $ 912,169 $ 864,826
Town Manager's Office
General Fund $ 1,314,145 $ $ 1,294,364 $ 1,028,734
Department Total $ 1,314,145 $ $ 1,294,364 $ 1,028,734
Parks and Recreation
General Fund $ 3,808,366 $ $ 3,497,763 $ 3,478,517
Parks & Recreation Impact Fee Fund 781,806 100,000 995,000
Recreation In Lieu Fee Fund 15,718 16,004
Community Center Fund 6,727,918 5,868,694 7,177,693
Community Center Bond Fund 3,000,000
Department Total $ 14,333,808 $ $ 9,466,457 $ 11,667,214
Police
General Fund $ 17,448,615 $ $ 16,993,985 $ 17,051,408
Seizures and Forfeitures 372,883 59,593 327,000
Police Impact Fee Fund 764,149 (650,000)110,000 101,035
Department Total $ 18,585,647 $(650,000)$ 17,163,578 $ 17,479,443
Public Works
General Fund $ 4,826,507 $ $ 4,631,486 $ 4,898,891
Highway Fund 4,213,739 4,014,875 4,066,213
Stormwater Utility Fund 4,048,405 1,454,117 1,807,750
PAG/RTA Fund 10,790,268 11,914,954 2,497,386
Townwide Roadway Impact Fee Fund 3,010,000 1,016,000 2,110,000
Department Total $ 26,888,919 $ $ 23,031,432 $ 15,380,240
Water Utility
Water Utility Fund $ 22,810,077 $ $ 20,292,274 $ 20,273,074
Alt Water Resources Impact Fee Fund 2,859,800 1,227,558
Potable Water System Impact Fee Fund 1,435,996 445,996
Water Resources Dev Impact Fee Fund 6,981,099
Department Total $ 27,105,873 $ $ 21,965,828 $ 27,254,173
*Includes actual expenditures/expenses recognized on the modified accrual or accrual basis as of the date the proposed budget
was prepared, plus estimated expenditures/expenses for the remainder of the fiscal year.
4/19 Arizona Auditor General's Office SCHEDULE F Official City/Town Budget Forms
Full-Time Equivalent (FTE)Employee Salaries and Hourly Costs Retirement Costs Healthcare CostsOther Benefit CostsTotal Estimated Personnel Compensation2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021310.69 $ 19,657,600 $ 4,732,060 $ 2,527,995 $ 2,059,155 $ 28,976,810Highway User Revenue Fund 15.00 $ 1,031,311 $ 126,026 $ 126,656 $ 103,659 $ 1,387,652Community Center Fund 21.55 667,837 14,122 25,910 54,844 762,713Seizures and Forfeitures 1.00 54,422 22,667 11,381 7,319 95,789Total Special Revenue Funds37.55 $ 1,753,570 $ 162,815 $ 163,947 $ 165,822 $ 2,246,154Water Utility Fund 40.48 $ 2,525,621 $ 306,641 $ 418,962 $ 244,133 $ 3,495,357Stormwater Utility Fund 10.25 608,204 74,323 86,337 61,643 830,507Total Enterprise Funds50.73 $ 3,133,825 $ 380,964 $ 505,299 $ 305,776 $ 4,325,864TOTAL ALL FUNDS398.97 $ 24,544,995 $ 5,275,839 $ 3,197,241 $ 2,530,753 $ 35,548,828SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDSENTERPRISE FUNDSFUNDTOWN OF ORO VALLEYFull-Time Employees and Personnel CompensationFiscal Year 2021GENERAL FUND 4/19 Arizona Auditor General's Office SCHEDULE G Official City/Towns Budget Forms
Fiscal Year 2020-2021
General Fund
Fund Summary
FY 2020 FY 2020 FY 2021 $ %
Budget Projected Budget to Budget to Budget
Revenues and Other Sources
Local Taxes 19,311,206 18,793,612 18,128,304 (1,182,902) -6.1%
Licenses and Permits 1,984,118 2,184,210 1,592,500 (391,618) -19.7%
Federal Grants 549,543 377,500 5,790,969 5,241,426 953.8%
State Grants 75,000 75,000 75,000 - 0.0%
State Shared Revenues 12,530,715 12,070,307 13,194,438 663,723 5.3%
Intergovernmental 1,675,000 1,585,000 1,672,000 (3,000) -0.2%
Charges for Services 2,552,639 2,141,965 2,239,675 (312,964) -12.3%
Fines 120,000 120,000 125,000 5,000 4.2%
Interest Income 150,000 555,980 150,000 - 0.0%
Miscellaneous 288,000 295,800 262,500 (25,500) -8.9%
Transfer from Community Center Fund 120,000 120,000 120,000 - 0.0%
Total 39,356,221$ 38,319,374$ 43,350,386$ 3,994,165$ 10.1%
Expenditures and Other Uses
Personnel 29,146,622 28,432,662 28,976,810 (169,812) -0.6%
Operations & Maintenance 10,193,107 9,922,934 11,771,081 1,577,974 15.5%
Capital Outlay 706,050 482,664 738,000 31,950 4.5%
Transfer to Capital Fund:1,100,000 1,100,000 1,021,143 (78,857) -7.2%
Transfer to Debt Service Fund 795,436 795,436 818,377 22,941 2.9%
Total 41,941,215$ 40,733,696$ 43,325,411$ 1,384,196$ 3.3%
Increase/(Decrease)(2,584,994)$ (2,414,322)$ 24,975$
Beginning Fund Balance 17,157,343
Total Ending Fund Balance 17,182,318
25% Coverage 10,831,353
Fiscal Year 2020-2021
Community Center Fund
Fund Summary
FY 2020 FY 2020 FY 2021 $%
Budget Projected Budget to Budget to Budget
Revenues and Other Sources
Local Sales Tax 2,478,552 2,300,962 2,492,960 14,408 0.6%
Charges for Services 4,270,053 3,734,208 4,479,650 209,597 4.9%
Miscellaneous - 12,390 126,000 126,000 0.0%
Total 6,748,605$ 6,047,560$ 7,098,610$ 350,005$ 5.2%
Expenditures and Other Uses
Personnel 850,734 773,964 762,713 (88,021) -10.3%
Operations & Maintenance 4,786,685 4,560,277 4,417,077 (369,608) -7.7%
Equipment Leases 438,468 427,953 294,792 (143,676) -32.8%
Capital Outlay 106,500 106,500 1,124,500 1,018,000 955.9%
Transfer to Debt Service Fund 148,810 148,810 158,302 9,492 6.4%
Transfer to General Fund 120,000 120,000 120,000 - 0.0%
Total 6,451,197$ 6,137,504$ 6,877,384$ 426,187$ 6.6%
Increase/(Decrease)297,408$ (89,944)$ 221,226$
Beginning Fund Balance
Committed 405,988$
Ending Fund Balance
Restricted 627,214$
Fiscal Year 2020-2021
Capital Fund
Fund Summary
FY 2020 FY 2020 FY 2021 $%
Budget Projected Budget to Budget to Budget
Revenues and Other Sources
Transfer from General Fund 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,021,143 (78,857) -7.2%
Federal Grants 229,500 108,401 - (229,500) -100.0%
State Grants 100,000 88,116 117,000 17,000 17.0%
Bond Proceeds - - - - 0.0%
Miscellaneous - 490,512 250,000 250,000 0.0%
Vehicle Reserves 536,900 536,900 633,010 96,110 17.9%
Total 1,966,400$ 2,323,929$ 2,021,153$ 54,753 2.8%
Expenditures and Other Uses
Operations & Maintenance - 950 - - 0.0%
Capital Outlay 3,999,100 3,656,666 3,994,666 (4,434) -0.1%
Total 3,999,100$ 3,657,616$ 3,994,666$ (4,434) -0.1%
Increase/(Decrease)(2,032,700)$ (1,333,687)$ (1,973,513)$
Beginning Fund Balance
Assigned 2,277,358
Ending Fund Balance
Assigned 303,845$
Town Council Regular and Study Session 1.
Meeting Date:07/01/2020
Submitted By:Michael Dyckman, Finance
Department:Finance
SUBJECT:
DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING THE TOWN’S FISCAL YEAR 2020/21 BUDGET
RECOMMENDATION:
N/A
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
On June 17, 2020, the Town adopted the Tentative Budget and expenditure limitation for fiscal year 2020/21 in the
amount of $105,435,626. The item presented tonight is to allow for further discussion and possible action by Council
to direct staff regarding final changes for the 2020/21 budget prior to final adoption scheduled for July 15, 2020.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUGGESTED MOTION:
This item is for information only.
Attachments
FY 2020/21 Tentative Budget
Fund Summaries
OFFICIAL BUDGET FORMS
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
Fiscal Year 2021
4/19 Arizona Auditor General's Office Official City/Town Budget Forms
Schedule B—Tax Levy and Tax Rate Information
Schedule G—Full-Time Employees and Personnel Compensation
Schedule C—Revenues Other Than Property Taxes
Schedule D—Other Financing Sources/(Uses) and Interfund Transfers
Schedule E—Expenditures/Expenses by Fund
Schedule F—Expenditures/Expenses by Department (as applicable)
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Fiscal Year 2021
Resolution for the Adoption of the Budget
Schedule A—Summary Schedule of Estimated Revenues and Expenditures/Expenses
4/19 Arizona Auditor General's Office Official City/Town Budget Forms
Fiscal YearGeneral FundSpecial Revenue Fund Debt Service FundCapital Projects Fund Permanent FundEnterprise Funds AvailableInternal Service Funds Total All Funds2020 Adopted/Adjusted Budgeted Expenditures/Expenses* E140,706,766 11,314,540 1,468,201 26,156,755 0 26,858,482 4,514,972 111,019,7162020 Actual Expenditures/Expenses** E238,693,390 9,943,162 1,376,102 18,672,124 0 21,746,391 3,617,475 94,048,6442021 Fund Balance/Net Position at July 1*** 317,157,343 1,227,740 197,503 20,662,679 0 11,160,760 1,107,185 51,513,2102021 Primary Property Tax LevyB4002021 Secondary Property Tax Levy B502021 Estimated Revenues Other than Property Taxes C643,230,386 11,126,539 318,283 5,729,445 0 17,678,500 4,207,654 82,290,8072021 Other Financing Sources D70 0 0 0 0 2,942,995 0 2,942,9952021 Other Financing (Uses) D80 0 00000 02021 Interfund Transfers In D9120,000 0 1,079,200 17,617,021 0 0 0 18,816,2212021 Interfund Transfers (Out) D101,839,520 278,302 0 14,492,678 0 2,205,721 0 18,816,2212021 Reduction for Amounts Not Available:11LESS: Amounts for Future Debt Retirement:89,82589,825Future Capital Projects287,153 12,821,277 7,495,710 20,604,140Maintained Fund Balance for Financial Stability9,792,318 217,918607,185 10,617,421002021 Total Financial Resources Available1248,875,891 11,570,906 1,505,161 16,695,190 0 22,080,824 4,707,654 105,435,6262021Budgeted Expenditures/ExpensesE1348,875,891 11,570,906 1,505,161 16,695,190 0 22,080,824 4,707,654 105,435,626EXPENDITURE LIMITATION COMPARISON 2020 20211Budgeted expenditures/expenses111,019,716$ 105,435,626$ 2Add/subtract: estimated net reconciling items3Budgeted expenditures/expenses adjusted for reconciling items 111,019,716 105,435,626 4Less: estimated exclusions5Amount subject to the expenditure limitation111,019,716$ 105,435,626$ 6EEC expenditure limitation$ $ X******Amounts on this line represent Fund Balance/Net Position amounts except for amounts not in spendable form (e.g., prepaids and inventories) or legally or contractually required to be maintained intact (e.g., principal of a permanent fund).SchFUNDSIncludes Expenditure/Expense Adjustments Approved in the current year from Schedule E. The city/town does not levy property taxes and does not have special assessment districts for which property taxes are levied. Therefore, Schedule B has been omitted.TOWN OF ORO VALLEYSummary Schedule of Estimated Revenues and Expenditures/ExpensesFiscal Year 2021Includes actual amounts as of the date the proposed budget was prepared, adjusted for estimated activity for the remainder of the fiscal year. 4/19 Arizona Auditor General's OfficeSCHEDULE AOfficial City/Town Budget Forms
ESTIMATED
REVENUES
ACTUAL
REVENUES*
ESTIMATED
REVENUES
2020 2020 2021
GENERAL FUND
Local taxes
Local Sales Tax $ 18,686,206 $ 18,274,146 $ 17,513,304
Cable Franchise Tax 625,000 625,000 615,000
Licenses and permits
Licenses 206,300 206,300 202,500
Permits 1,624,818 1,929,922 1,246,500
Fees 153,000 198,250 143,500
Intergovernmental
State/County Shared 12,530,715 12,185,307 13,194,438
State Grants 75,000 75,000 75,000
Federal Grants 549,543 364,819 5,790,969
Reimbursements 1,585,000 1,285,000 1,580,000
Other 90,000 100,000 92,000
Charges for services
Reimbursements 152,400 153,000 157,400
Fees 1,369,700 903,211 1,061,150
Other 1,030,539 1,031,539 1,021,125
Fines and forfeits
Fines 120,000 110,000 125,000
Interest on investments
Interest Income 150,000 504,929 150,000
Miscellaneous
Miscellaneous 288,000 316,926 262,500
Total General Fund $ 39,236,221 $ 38,263,349 $ 43,230,386
*
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
Revenues Other Than Property Taxes
Fiscal Year 2021
Includes actual revenues recognized on the modified accrual or accrual basis as of the date the proposed budget was
prepared, plus estimated revenues for the remainder of the fiscal year.
SOURCE OF REVENUES
4/19 Arizona Auditor General's Office SCHEDULE C Official City/Town Budget Forms
ESTIMATED
REVENUES
ACTUAL
REVENUES*
ESTIMATED
REVENUES
2020 2020 2021
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
Revenues Other Than Property Taxes
Fiscal Year 2021
SOURCE OF REVENUES
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
Highway User Revenue Fund
Highway User Fuel Tax $ 3,604,407 $ 3,513,856 $ 3,458,929
Permits 50 25,000
Interest Income 3,168 5,000
State Grants 180,000 180,000 210,000
Other 1,500 63,827 2,000
$ 3,785,907 $ 3,760,901 $ 3,700,929
Seizures & Forfeitures
Seizures & Forfeitures $ 325,000 $ 33,000 $ 325,000
Interest Income 6,100 2,000
$ 325,000 $ 39,100 $ 327,000
Community Center Fund
Local Sales Tax $ 2,478,552 $ 2,300,962 $ 2,492,960
Charges for Services 4,250,551 3,714,706 4,460,148
Other 19,502 19,502 145,502
$ 6,748,605 $ 6,035,170 $ 7,098,610
Total Special Revenue Funds $ 10,859,512 $ 9,835,171 $ 11,126,539
* Includes actual revenues recognized on the modified accrual or accrual basis as of the date the proposed budget was
prepared, plus estimated revenues for the remainder of the fiscal year.
4/19 Arizona Auditor General's Office SCHEDULE C Official City/Town Budget Forms
ESTIMATED
REVENUES
ACTUAL
REVENUES*
ESTIMATED
REVENUES
2020 2020 2021
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
Revenues Other Than Property Taxes
Fiscal Year 2021
SOURCE OF REVENUES
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
Municipal Debt Service Fund
Federal Grants $ 43,509 $ 43,509 $ 39,245
Interest Income 5,000 18,639 5,000
Miscellaneous 100,000 104,000 100,000
$ 148,509 $ 166,148 $ 144,245
Oracle Road Improvement District
Special Assessments $ 176,912 168,630 $ 174,038
$ 176,912 $ 168,630 $ 174,038
Total Debt Service Funds $ 325,421 $ 334,778 $ 318,283
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS
Alternative Water Resources Development Impact Fee Fund
Development Impact Fees $ 1,276,190 $ 1,644,000 $
Interest Income 40,000 69,271
$ 1,316,190 $ 1,713,271 $
Potable Water System Development Impact Fee Fund
Development Impact Fees $ 635,728 $ 818,000 $
Interest Income 36,800 63,729
$ 672,528 $ 881,729 $
Water Resources Development Impact Fee Fund
Development Impact Fees $ $ $ 1,889,411
Interest Income 182,000
$ $ $ 2,071,411
Townwide Roadway Development Impact Fee Fund
Development Impact Fees $ 541,430 $ 525,095 $ 314,320
Interest Income 30,000 29,387 30,000
$ 571,430 $ 554,482 $ 344,320
Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Fund
Development Impact Fees $ 244,816 $ 240,025 $ 309,668
Interest Income 9,480 5,000
$ 244,816 $ 249,505 $ 314,668
Police Impact Fee Fund
Development Impact Fees $ 111,074 $ 104,951 $ 95,911
Interest Income 1,600
$ 111,074 $ 106,551 $ 95,911
Capital Fund
Miscellaneous $ 536,900 $ 536,900 $ 883,010
State Grants 100,000 100,000 117,000
Federal Grants 229,500 229,500
$ 866,400 $ 866,400 $ 1,000,010
PAG/RTA Fund
State Grants $ 10,300,000 $ 11,716,553 $ 1,875,000
Other 28,125 28,125 28,125
Miscellaneous 198,401
$ 10,328,125 $ 11,943,079 $ 1,903,125
Total Capital Projects Funds $ 14,110,563 $ 16,315,017 $ 5,729,445
* Includes actual revenues recognized on the modified accrual or accrual basis as of the date the proposed budget was
prepared, plus estimated revenues for the remainder of the fiscal year.
4/19 Arizona Auditor General's Office SCHEDULE C Official City/Town Budget Forms
ESTIMATED
REVENUES
ACTUAL
REVENUES*
ESTIMATED
REVENUES
2020 2020 2021
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
Revenues Other Than Property Taxes
Fiscal Year 2021
SOURCE OF REVENUES
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
Water Utility Fund
Water Sales $ 13,714,000 $ 13,434,000 $ 13,078,000
Charges for Services 3,262,700 3,219,700 3,086,500
Interest Income 63,000 130,000 75,000
$ 17,039,700 $ 16,783,700 $ 16,239,500
Stormwater Utility Fund
Charges for Services $ 1,422,000 $ 1,438,000 $ 1,438,000
Interest Income 1,000 17,852 1,000
State Grants 2,100,000
Miscellaneous 10
$ 3,523,000 $ 1,455,862 $ 1,439,000
Total Enterprise Funds $ 20,562,700 $ 18,239,562 $ 17,678,500
* Includes actual revenues recognized on the modified accrual or accrual basis as of the date the proposed budget was
prepared, plus estimated revenues for the remainder of the fiscal year.
4/19 Arizona Auditor General's Office SCHEDULE C Official City/Town Budget Forms
ESTIMATED
REVENUES
ACTUAL
REVENUES*
ESTIMATED
REVENUES
2020 2020 2021
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
Revenues Other Than Property Taxes
Fiscal Year 2021
SOURCE OF REVENUES
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
Benefit Self Insurance Fund
Miscellaneous $ 4,014,972 $ 3,988,152 $ 4,207,654
$ 4,014,972 $ 3,988,152 $ 4,207,654
Total Internal Service Funds $ 4,014,972 $ 3,988,152 $ 4,207,654
TOTAL ALL FUNDS $ 89,109,389 $ 86,976,029 $ 82,290,807
* Includes actual revenues recognized on the modified accrual or accrual basis as of the date the proposed budget was
prepared, plus estimated revenues for the remainder of the fiscal year.
4/19 Arizona Auditor General's Office SCHEDULE C Official City/Town Budget Forms
FUND SOURCES (USES)IN (OUT)
GENERAL FUND
Transfer from Community Center Fund $ $ $ 120,000 $
Transfer to Capital Fund 1,021,143
Transfer to Debt Service Fund 815,377
Transfer to Oracle Rd Improvement District Fund 3,000
Total General Fund $ $ $ 120,000 $ 1,839,520
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
Community Center Fund $ $ $ $ 278,302
Total Special Revenue Funds $ $ $ $ 278,302
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
Municipal Debt Service Fund $ $ $ 1,076,200 $
Oracle Rd Improvement District Fund 3,000
Total Debt Service Funds $ $ $ 1,079,200 $
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS
Capital Fund $ $ $ 1,021,143 $
Police Impact Fee Fund 100,000
Alt Water Resources Impact Fee Fund 8,611,958
Potable Water System Impact Fee Fund 5,780,720
Water Resources Impact Fee Fund 16,595,878
Total Capital Projects Funds $ $ $ 17,617,021 $ 14,492,678
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
Water Utility Fund $ 2,942,995 $ $ $ 2,205,721
Total Enterprise Funds $ 2,942,995 $ $ $ 2,205,721
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
$$$$
Total Internal Service Funds $$$$
TOTAL ALL FUNDS $ 2,942,995 $ $ 18,816,221 $ 18,816,221
2021 2021
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
Other Financing Sources/(Uses) and Interfund Transfers
Fiscal Year 2021
OTHER FINANCING INTERFUND TRANSFERS
4/19 Arizona Auditor General's Office SCHEDULE D Official City/Town Budget Forms
ADOPTED
BUDGETED
EXPENDITURES/
EXPENSES
EXPENDITURE/
EXPENSE
ADJUSTMENTS
APPROVED
ACTUAL
EXPENDITURES/
EXPENSES*
BUDGETED
EXPENDITURES/
EXPENSES
FUND/DEPARTMENT 2020 2020 2020 2021
GENERAL FUND
Administrative Services $ 4,648,370 $ $ 4,540,359 $
Human Resources 457,347
Innovation and Strategy 3,846,018
Finance 832,888
Clerk 366,336 361,076 428,524
Community and Economic Development 3,039,421 2,787,207 2,779,661
Council 206,001 206,001 197,019
General Administration 2,590,400 2,594,923 4,751,466
Legal 874,057 874,057 870,592
Magistrate Court 923,561 912,169 864,826
Town Manager's Office 1,314,145 1,294,364 1,028,734
Parks and Recreation 3,808,366 3,497,763 3,478,517
Police 17,448,615 16,993,985 17,051,408
Public Works 4,826,507 4,631,486 4,898,891
Contingency Reserve 841,325 (180,338)7,390,000
Total General Fund $ 40,887,104 $(180,338)$ 38,693,390 $ 48,875,891
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
Highway User Revenue Fund $ 4,213,739 $ $ 4,014,875 $ 4,066,213
Seizures and Forfeitures 372,883 59,593 327,000
Community Center Fund 6,727,918 5,868,694 7,177,693
Total Special Revenue Funds $ 11,314,540 $ $ 9,943,162 $ 11,570,906
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
Municipal Debt Service Fund $ 1,282,049 $ $ 1,200,228 $ 1,325,445
Oracle Rd. Improvement District Fund 186,152 175,874 179,716
Total Debt Service Funds $ 1,468,201 $ $ 1,376,102 $ 1,505,161
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS
Townwide Roadway Impact Fee Fund $ 3,010,000 $ $ 1,016,000 $ 2,110,000
Alt Water Resources Impact Fee Fund 2,859,800 1,227,558
Potable Water System Impact Fee Fund 1,435,996 445,996
Water Resources Dev Impact Fee Fund 6,981,099
Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Fund 781,806 100,000 995,000
Police Impact Fee Fund 764,149 (650,000)110,000 101,035
General Government Impact Fee Fund 3,580
Recreation In Lieu Fee Fund 15,718 16,004
Capital Fund 3,315,100 830,338 3,857,616 3,994,666
PAG/RTA Fund 10,790,268 11,914,954 2,497,386
Community Center Bond Fund 3,000,000
Total Capital Projects Funds $ 25,976,417 $ 180,338 $ 18,672,124 $ 16,695,190
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
Water Utility Enterprise Fund $ 22,810,077 $ $ 20,292,274 $ 20,273,074
Stormwater Utility Enterprise Fund 4,048,405 1,454,117 1,807,750
Total Enterprise Funds $ 26,858,482 $ $ 21,746,391 $ 22,080,824
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
Benefit Self Insurance Fund $ 4,514,972 $ $ 3,617,475 $ 4,707,654
Total Internal Service Funds $ 4,514,972 $ $ 3,617,475 $ 4,707,654
TOTAL ALL FUNDS $ 111,019,716 $ $ 94,048,644 $ 105,435,626
*
Expenditures/Expenses by Fund
Fiscal Year 2021
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
Includes actual expenditures/expenses recognized on the modified accrual or accrual basis as of the date the proposed budget was
prepared, plus estimated expenditures/expenses for the remainder of the fiscal year.
4/19 Arizona Auditor General's Office SCHEDULE E Official City/Town Budget Forms
ADOPTED
BUDGETED
EXPENDITURES/
EXPENSES
EXPENDITURE/
EXPENSE
ADJUSTMENTS
APPROVED
ACTUAL
EXPENDITURES/
EXPENSES*
BUDGETED
EXPENDITURES/
EXPENSES
2020 2020 2020 2021
Administrative Services
General Fund $ 4,648,370 $ $ 4,540,359 $
Department Total $ 4,648,370 $ $ 4,540,359 $
Human Resources
General Fund $ $ $ $ 457,347
Department Total $ $ $ $ 457,347
Innovation & Strategy
General Fund $ $ $ $ 3,846,018
Department Total $ $ $ $ 3,846,018
Finance
General Fund $ $ $ $ 832,888
Department Total $ $ $ $ 832,888
Clerk
General Fund $ 366,336 $ $ 361,076 $ 428,524
Department Total $ 366,336 $ $ 361,076 $ 428,524
Community & Economic Development
General Fund $ 3,039,421 $ $ 2,787,207 $ 2,779,661
Department Total $ 3,039,421 $ $ 2,787,207 $ 2,779,661
Council
General Fund $ 206,001 $ $ 206,001 $ 197,019
Department Total $ 206,001 $ $ 206,001 $ 197,019
General Administration
General Fund $ 2,590,400 $ $ 2,594,923 $ 4,751,466
General Fund - Contingency Reserve 841,325 (180,338)7,390,000
Municipal Debt Service Fund 1,282,049 1,200,228 1,325,445
Oracle Rd. Improvement District Fund 186,152 175,874 179,716
Benefit Self Insurance Fund 4,514,972 3,617,475 4,707,654
General Government Impact Fee Fund 3,580
Capital Fund 3,315,100 830,338 3,857,616 3,994,666
Department Total $ 12,733,578 $ 650,000 $ 11,446,116 $ 22,348,947
Expenditures/Expenses by Department
Fiscal Year 2021
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
DEPARTMENT/FUND
4/19 Arizona Auditor General's Office SCHEDULE F Official City/Town Budget Forms
ADOPTED
BUDGETED
EXPENDITURES/
EXPENSES
EXPENDITURE/
EXPENSE
ADJUSTMENTS
APPROVED
ACTUAL
EXPENDITURES/
EXPENSES*
BUDGETED
EXPENDITURES/
EXPENSES
2020 2020 2020 2021
Expenditures/Expenses by Department
Fiscal Year 2021
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
DEPARTMENT/FUND
Legal
General Fund $ 874,057 $ $ 874,057 $ 870,592
Department Total $ 874,057 $ $ 874,057 $ 870,592
Magistrate Court
General Fund $ 923,561 $ $ 912,169 $ 864,826
Department Total $ 923,561 $ $ 912,169 $ 864,826
Town Manager's Office
General Fund $ 1,314,145 $ $ 1,294,364 $ 1,028,734
Department Total $ 1,314,145 $ $ 1,294,364 $ 1,028,734
Parks and Recreation
General Fund $ 3,808,366 $ $ 3,497,763 $ 3,478,517
Parks & Recreation Impact Fee Fund 781,806 100,000 995,000
Recreation In Lieu Fee Fund 15,718 16,004
Community Center Fund 6,727,918 5,868,694 7,177,693
Community Center Bond Fund 3,000,000
Department Total $ 14,333,808 $ $ 9,466,457 $ 11,667,214
Police
General Fund $ 17,448,615 $ $ 16,993,985 $ 17,051,408
Seizures and Forfeitures 372,883 59,593 327,000
Police Impact Fee Fund 764,149 (650,000)110,000 101,035
Department Total $ 18,585,647 $(650,000)$ 17,163,578 $ 17,479,443
Public Works
General Fund $ 4,826,507 $ $ 4,631,486 $ 4,898,891
Highway Fund 4,213,739 4,014,875 4,066,213
Stormwater Utility Fund 4,048,405 1,454,117 1,807,750
PAG/RTA Fund 10,790,268 11,914,954 2,497,386
Townwide Roadway Impact Fee Fund 3,010,000 1,016,000 2,110,000
Department Total $ 26,888,919 $ $ 23,031,432 $ 15,380,240
Water Utility
Water Utility Fund $ 22,810,077 $ $ 20,292,274 $ 20,273,074
Alt Water Resources Impact Fee Fund 2,859,800 1,227,558
Potable Water System Impact Fee Fund 1,435,996 445,996
Water Resources Dev Impact Fee Fund 6,981,099
Department Total $ 27,105,873 $ $ 21,965,828 $ 27,254,173
*Includes actual expenditures/expenses recognized on the modified accrual or accrual basis as of the date the proposed budget
was prepared, plus estimated expenditures/expenses for the remainder of the fiscal year.
4/19 Arizona Auditor General's Office SCHEDULE F Official City/Town Budget Forms
Full-Time Equivalent (FTE)Employee Salaries and Hourly Costs Retirement Costs Healthcare CostsOther Benefit CostsTotal Estimated Personnel Compensation2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021310.69 $ 19,657,600 $ 4,732,060 $ 2,527,995 $ 2,059,155 $ 28,976,810Highway User Revenue Fund 15.00 $ 1,031,311 $ 126,026 $ 126,656 $ 103,659 $ 1,387,652Community Center Fund 21.55 667,837 14,122 25,910 54,844 762,713Seizures and Forfeitures 1.00 54,422 22,667 11,381 7,319 95,789Total Special Revenue Funds37.55 $ 1,753,570 $ 162,815 $ 163,947 $ 165,822 $ 2,246,154Water Utility Fund 40.48 $ 2,525,621 $ 306,641 $ 418,962 $ 244,133 $ 3,495,357Stormwater Utility Fund 10.25 608,204 74,323 86,337 61,643 830,507Total Enterprise Funds50.73 $ 3,133,825 $ 380,964 $ 505,299 $ 305,776 $ 4,325,864TOTAL ALL FUNDS398.97 $ 24,544,995 $ 5,275,839 $ 3,197,241 $ 2,530,753 $ 35,548,828SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDSENTERPRISE FUNDSFUNDTOWN OF ORO VALLEYFull-Time Employees and Personnel CompensationFiscal Year 2021GENERAL FUND 4/19 Arizona Auditor General's Office SCHEDULE G Official City/Towns Budget Forms
Fiscal Year 2020-2021
General Fund
Fund Summary
FY 2020 FY 2020 FY 2021 $ %
Budget Projected Budget to Budget to Budget
Revenues and Other Sources
Local Taxes 19,311,206 18,793,612 18,128,304 (1,182,902) -6.1%
Licenses and Permits 1,984,118 2,184,210 1,592,500 (391,618) -19.7%
Federal Grants 549,543 377,500 5,790,969 5,241,426 953.8%
State Grants 75,000 75,000 75,000 - 0.0%
State Shared Revenues 12,530,715 12,070,307 13,194,438 663,723 5.3%
Intergovernmental 1,675,000 1,585,000 1,672,000 (3,000) -0.2%
Charges for Services 2,552,639 2,141,965 2,239,675 (312,964) -12.3%
Fines 120,000 120,000 125,000 5,000 4.2%
Interest Income 150,000 555,980 150,000 - 0.0%
Miscellaneous 288,000 295,800 262,500 (25,500) -8.9%
Transfer from Community Center Fund 120,000 120,000 120,000 - 0.0%
Total 39,356,221$ 38,319,374$ 43,350,386$ 3,994,165$ 10.1%
Expenditures and Other Uses
Personnel 29,146,622 28,432,662 28,976,810 (169,812) -0.6%
Operations & Maintenance 10,193,107 9,922,934 11,771,081 1,577,974 15.5%
Capital Outlay 706,050 482,664 738,000 31,950 4.5%
Transfer to Capital Fund:1,100,000 1,100,000 1,021,143 (78,857) -7.2%
Transfer to Debt Service Fund 795,436 795,436 818,377 22,941 2.9%
Total 41,941,215$ 40,733,696$ 43,325,411$ 1,384,196$ 3.3%
Increase/(Decrease)(2,584,994)$ (2,414,322)$ 24,975$
Beginning Fund Balance 17,157,343
Total Ending Fund Balance 17,182,318
25% Coverage 10,831,353
Fiscal Year 2020-2021
Community Center Fund
Fund Summary
FY 2020 FY 2020 FY 2021 $%
Budget Projected Budget to Budget to Budget
Revenues and Other Sources
Local Sales Tax 2,478,552 2,300,962 2,492,960 14,408 0.6%
Charges for Services 4,270,053 3,734,208 4,479,650 209,597 4.9%
Miscellaneous - 12,390 126,000 126,000 0.0%
Total 6,748,605$ 6,047,560$ 7,098,610$ 350,005$ 5.2%
Expenditures and Other Uses
Personnel 850,734 773,964 762,713 (88,021) -10.3%
Operations & Maintenance 4,786,685 4,560,277 4,417,077 (369,608) -7.7%
Equipment Leases 438,468 427,953 294,792 (143,676) -32.8%
Capital Outlay 106,500 106,500 1,124,500 1,018,000 955.9%
Transfer to Debt Service Fund 148,810 148,810 158,302 9,492 6.4%
Transfer to General Fund 120,000 120,000 120,000 - 0.0%
Total 6,451,197$ 6,137,504$ 6,877,384$ 426,187$ 6.6%
Increase/(Decrease)297,408$ (89,944)$ 221,226$
Beginning Fund Balance
Committed 405,988$
Ending Fund Balance
Restricted 627,214$
Fiscal Year 2020-2021
Capital Fund
Fund Summary
FY 2020 FY 2020 FY 2021 $%
Budget Projected Budget to Budget to Budget
Revenues and Other Sources
Transfer from General Fund 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,021,143 (78,857) -7.2%
Federal Grants 229,500 108,401 - (229,500) -100.0%
State Grants 100,000 88,116 117,000 17,000 17.0%
Bond Proceeds - - - - 0.0%
Miscellaneous - 490,512 250,000 250,000 0.0%
Vehicle Reserves 536,900 536,900 633,010 96,110 17.9%
Total 1,966,400$ 2,323,929$ 2,021,153$ 54,753 2.8%
Expenditures and Other Uses
Operations & Maintenance - 950 - - 0.0%
Capital Outlay 3,999,100 3,656,666 3,994,666 (4,434) -0.1%
Total 3,999,100$ 3,657,616$ 3,994,666$ (4,434) -0.1%
Increase/(Decrease)(2,032,700)$ (1,333,687)$ (1,973,513)$
Beginning Fund Balance
Assigned 2,277,358
Ending Fund Balance
Assigned 303,845$