Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Packets - Council Packets (1480)
AGENDA ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL SPECIAL/STUDY SESSION MAY 22, 2000 ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11,000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE SPECIAL SESSION CALL TO ORDER — AT OR AFTER 6:30 P.M. ROLL CALL 1. RESOLUTION NO. (R)00-48 CANVASS OF THE VOTE - MAY 16, 2000 GENERAL ELECTION 2. PUBLIC HEARING INCREASING TOWN WIDE ROADWAY IMPACT FEE ADJOURN SPECIAL SESSION STUDY SESSION CALL TO ORDER — AT OR AFTER 7:00 P.M. ROLL CALL 1. BUDGET REVIEW: A. Review of Follow-up issues from 5/10/00 Budget Review Session B. Review and Discussion regarding Revised General Fund Revenue Budget Estimates for FY 2000/01 7:00 p.m. Highway Fund — Public Works Pages 351-365 7:25 p.m. Townwide Roadway Development Impact Fees Pages 407-416 7:50 p.m. Oracle Road Improvement District Construction Fund Pages 417-419 8:00 p.m. Public Transportation Pages 366-381 8:20 p.m. Facilities Maintenance Pages 162-169 2. REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS CONCERNING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A STORMWATER MANAGEMENT UTILITY ADJOURNMENT The Town of Oro Valley complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If any person with a disability needs any type of accommodation, please notify the Oro Valley Town Clerk at 229-4700. POSTED: 5/19/00 4:30 p.m. lh 1 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: May 22, 2000 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk SUBJECT: Resolution No. (R)00- 48 — Canvass of the Votes — Declaring and adopting the results of the General Election held on May 16, 2000 SUMMARY: The attached resolution declares and adopts the results of the general election held on May 16, 2000. The official canvass prepared by Pima County Elections dated 5/18/00 shows the following results: Richard Johnson 3139 (57.60%) Werner Wolff 3083 (56.57%) Bart Rochman 2396 (43.96%) Wayne Bryant 2368 (43.45%) Hector Conde 2331 (42.77%) Paul Parisi 1725 (31.65%) The following candidates received the highest votes and are hereby elected to the Office of Council Member effective June 7, 2000—May 2004: Richard Johnson Werner Wolff Bart Rochman SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. (R)00- 48 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. (R)00 - 48 2. Official Canvass prepared by Pima County Elections dated 5/18/00 / / (a. D- .a I nt Head i Ata„,x Town Manag•r RESOLUTION NO. (R)00-48 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, DECLARING AND ADOPTING THE RESULTS OF THE GENERAL ELECTION HELD ON MAY 16, 2000. WHEREAS, the Town of Oro Valley, Pima County, Arizona did hold a general election on the 16t" day of May 2000, for the election of three council members, and WHEREAS, the election returns have been presented to and have been canvassed by the Town Council, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Pima County, Arizona, as follows: SECTION 1. That the total number of ballots cast at said general election, as shown by the poll lists, was 5450. SECTION 2. That the number of ballots to be verified was 141, and that voters found to be ineligible were 70. SECTION 3. That the votes cast for the candidates for council member were as follows: Richard Johnson 3139 (57.60%) Wayne Bryant 2368 (43.45%) Werner Wolff 3083 (56.57%) Hector Conde 2331 (42.77%) Bart Rochman 2396 (43.96%) Paul Parisi 1725 (31.65%) SECTION 4. That it is hereby found, determined and declared of record, that the following candidates are hereby elected to the Office of Council Member and shall serve 4 year terms commencing June 7, 2000—May 2004: Richard Johnson Werner Wolff Bart Rochman SECTION 5. This resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this 22nd day of May, 2000. Paul H. Loomis, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Kathryn E. Cuvelier, Town Clerk Dan L. Dudley, Town Attorney Li i I I I 11:, te ovi3,44) , co r: T ),t9i w,‘ ,lii ''414) 111 in. leel 'It'"9 hT/ - NEW �RIz�P' PIMA COUNTY OFFICIAL CiA.SS:) TOVN OF ORO VALLEY GENERAL ELECTION MAY 16, 2000 PIMA COUNTY DIVISION OF ELECTIONS 130 W. CONGRESS ST. srtt FLOOR TUCSON, AZ 85701 � TEL. 740-4260 ELECTIONS MANAGER: MITCl.I ETTER 026.4 /,‘ _ i ,TY DIV fre .P.1r. :, t wl 11 I____./9 j *1/4'4,1111r r:-"'f \, \tea:1,"in f i, i ,,-,' w a ,!,' \*1----=-:-'4./ \'`'' '' 'C.,'\'TY.P.?'`-' DIVISION OF ELECTIONS 130 W. CONGRESS STREET TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701 (520) 740-4260 FAX (520) 620-1414 MITCH ETTER Elections Manager Be Heard... VOTE! May 18, 2000 In accordance with Arizona Revised Statutes, TitIe16, I hereby certify the enclosed tabulation is a full, true and correct copy of the Returns of the Consolidated Elections held pursuant to Arizona Constitution and Arizona Revised Statutes Title 9, 15, 16 and 19 in and for The Amphitheater Unified School District No. 10, The Tanque Verde Unified School District No. 13, The Indian Oasis/Baboquivari Unified School District No. 40, and The Town of Oro Valley, Pima County, Arizona on May 16, 2000. This tabulation includes all early ballots and verified ballots cast at said election. Respectfully submitted, 7// ,. or/ /If.- Mitchel F. Etter. Manager, Election Division f, v 0 v C) CZ ^� n� n r �. f 1 1� ..... C.r ..r.r f r 11�.�� ) .J • �„U ... 7..... ,V. .:24 v O bA U v r- -- U .- . v .Fr0 a.� e r"+ C .~ O W L' C C 0 N U U CJ V Cle.) ..or' 0 .J v < V J v /'� 0 `V �' U c G) , (:) 7:: 2 q0 ..., t/; OU z C7., U L C.) C.)E' l° v ,.. .., c,„.„-...„ U ,,, 8 0 ,..... .,_.. ,.. ,..... ..r ...... .._, _ ,... ..= _ ...... .7_,. .44 ...... -...-. c)s. = c. z 0 0 0 C.) ,... tat) .., .. = .., ,_ ..„4 ,_ (. L_. ___J = r_ ,.... --._ „ ,_ ,.... ....... C.) O -- C CX C/) Cl) Cl). v = U r... Gv cr, f r•� v� En •— ct CD ci: CD C) r.. f v CD v v ^^ .^ .... .fl ..c: ..c ri 4 :7; ,-- _ v O U •> v tJ cJ = ‘>6. `;, ›..( .., i = * cr; U v ct U v ..0 ,4 ...0 f. :r. v,rr ,� g..) G4 r vU i. L _ ..-5 0 ,... ...... .--J ,.. 0 ct < p . = > .... .., .... r ::., t.,.... c- ¢ G 3 :� 0 vi. -- G CD O > -C -C -O = y 4 In- >, v C.) CD ,o � i lit :74J ),p, •=g) . (=wt. 0 ,J „ 7.,- c, — — .... 0 to iz: 4) - , 4.1 c.: ..,„ tD = 0 •....1 0%. 7.1 i.ii, c_ C 0 IU� ` ..t i.i..- U Q Q cz•..... 0 .1. >„... , L_. ._. s,_ ,... c. c... ,.., c.) > ,_ 7, „-,. = = \.) ---”? ., co - 0 _ G — :_. G.. U G ¢ `+.� Cr A 0 v v) �; -- " s. J — 3 c. v y Or- - .� • �i� ,C..) >, = A — ..- Cr) r-- ^- O U U ;f — L.. UN .^ U i44 < _, L. C.) C `"' cr. CZ "V v J , i • ; cam. C.) "� v ._ .�, U ••+ = e` • ....) -0 P :- J O ;4 L J 4.1 CJ c4 ..r0 VGil C.... 44 '..H :...ti) ......, v v to — i = v c: v v v v a� ..... ,... rte/ ..... ...... r.... .. ` •• ^. �"' :l r V j e . 44 ..r O O CIO W • -a: T in — qt c: I C'w7 ct E r-i Z 1) E .. ucA .. , [.:, . c.) ,. — w) cf) E— sEil N, 4 . W, V rtO ct VO p p C) %>"( cA C.-) �, � v r v V 4 ',...: r...4 "Ea' ar") b-I5 CI) cr)_,4 44 4.1 C4 4tt cJ k) 8 E cg „t„, -4...) ci) ... ,. u ... .... u ..,_ pi, u = P4 w) . -52 x, , >"4 C4' U 2 i3 C4 •� 442 4.4 BI4 Fat:1 = Z jai Z © "C C4 iia: C2 U I 44 0 4 t” 4.4.4W CT: ci—) E—ig 4.11 ct ci) -4.4 .e..) cp u 44 '-'3 2 -me = = 2 = s-4 44 (,) 43 Z ct 0 © - 44 Pio , I OE , cz '.Z.. 1 0 .i.. • "1"4 C4. .-1 0 ' 0i) 4-a E-4 - 44 clia• P-0 `I-.4 8 cz s c.._) 41 z t , = c/) cz 44 UCD �L 0 L--) - . O 144 o c.4 = < Ca cek.4, cv p_. c� .4 2 E....., © L n 7:3 0 u pi. -4 =, . ,. , a . .,a . W C.') /ICci) 4 � w zi ..= ,) 2 l w 7: 'i"i , ,)..... 2 = wirt) g :_.)) 2 d TV .d CP 4.4 . b.4 l aa �" C/D 6 iz ci) cn v; cr. L L L 04: 10 PM PIMA COUNTY ELECTIONS FX NO1 520 620 1414 P. 02 MAY-18-00 THU EARLY BALLOTS PROCESSED MAY 16,2000 VOTING AREA EARLY BALLOTS COUNTED REJECTED 09-014. 4. . .• 319 - 09-02Hi4 _. -- 4/ .p 09-03 — -- 272 1 .— _- 09-04 97 -- -� o9-os ` ..... 4S _ N 1 TOTAL - 3 --- -- 850 10-01 138 2 Allalo .w 85 .1.-02 10-03 205 2 -- 10-04 -" �--�- `-" - -- --- - - 08 -- 10-05 56 — 4.41. 10-06 _. _ 29 10-07 29 �— -- -- ---. - 10-08 28 10-09 23 N -- M .r .., r . .... 4. 4.1111. _ �— JJ1 24 -- -- --- '- .A1Q.12 27 ....► ....1 10-13 34 -�--.. --- -- /0-14 �r �' 0111.` 38 '-' �" .�_ - 4_ - 10-15 31 10-16 11 ••- — — 10-17 4 .— ...0., , w A. 10-18 26 10-19 7 4. — 10-20 f 10 A. _' 10-21 --- �� s 50 A. --� 0-22 3 TOTAL - - 936 4 440. 13-.0....1 _ -- -- a4 — -. 13-02 -- - -- -� ... . -. 66- 13-03 -" `�' - 45 ._._ s .4,.13-04 - - .....� 47 TOTAL 202 AMY 41.1., -� — .f 40-01 — -- — — -- 2 .- 40-02 _ - - 40-03 0 _ —' — 40-04 0 ANEW 40-05 Th 40-46a- -- -` - - 40-07 0 - _ _ 0., ..11 i. 40-08 .. - -,M TOTAL � - GRAND TOTAL _ J �' ��-2006 7 - TO BE VERIFIED BALLOTS PROCESSED MAY 16, 2000 VOTING AREA TBV BALLOTS TBV BALLOTS TBV BALLOTS RECEIVED VERIFIED AND NOT VERIFIED & COUNTED UNCOUNTED 09-01 9 7 2 09-02 4 4 0 09-03 19 12 7 09-04 0 0 0 09-05 3 2 1 TOTAL 35 25 10 r 10-01 4 4 0 10-02 6 _ 4 2 10-03 17 10 7 10-04 0 0 0 10-05 1 0 1 10-06 2 _ 2 0 10-07 . 8 3 5 10-08 9 0 9 1 10-09 0 0 0 10-10 23 0 23 10-11 2 2 0 10-12 1 1 0 10-13 6 1 5 10-14 0 0 0 10-15 3 2 1 10-16 3 3 0 10-17 0 0 0 10-18 0 0 0 10-19 0 0 0 10-20 0 0 0 4- 10-21 2 2 0 10-22 2 2 0 TOTAL 89 36 53 13-01 4 3 1 r 13-02 3 3 0 13-03 2 0 2 13-04 3 1 2 TOTAL 12 7 5 40-01 2 2 0 40-02 0 0 0 40-03 0 0 0 40-04 0 0 0 40-05 1 1 0 40-06 _ 0 0 0 40-07 2 0 2 40-08 0 0 0 TOTAL 5 3 2 GRAND TOTAL 141 71 70 MAY 16 , 9000 Official Polling Place List Consolidated Elections May 16, 2000 18-May-00 PCT: 901-VA09-01 PCT: 902-VA09-02 PCT: 903-VA09-03 SUN CITY VISTOSO/MOUNTAIN VISTA RECREATION RESURRECTION LUTHERAN CHURCH ORO VALLEY TOWN HALL CENTER PAPAGO AND NAVAJO ROOMS FELLOWSHIP HALL 1&2 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1495-A E RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD 11575 N 1ST AVENUE 11000 N LA CANADA DRIVE TUCSON,AZ 85737 ORO VALLEY,AZ 85737 ORO VALLEY,AZ 85737 PCT: 904-VA09-04 PCT: 905-VA09-05 PCT: 1001-VA10-01 ORO VALLEY CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE PUSCH RIDGE CHRISTIAN CHURCH SUN CITY VISTOSO/MOUNTAIN VISTA RECREATION CENTER FELLOWSHIP HALL SANCTUARY PAPAGO AND NAVAJO ROOMS 500 W CALLE CONCORDIA 440 W CALLE CONCORDIA 1495-A E RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD ORO VALLEY,AZ 85737 TUCSON,AZ 85737 TUCSON,AZ 85737 PCT: 1002-VA10-02 PCT: 1003-VA10-03 PCT: 1004-VA10-04 RESURRECTION LUTHERAN CHURCH ORO VALLEY TOWN HALL ORO VALLEY CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE FELLOWSHIP HALL 1&2 COUNCIL CHAMBERS FELLOWSHIP HALL 11575 N 1ST AVENUE 11000 N LA CANADA DRIVE 500 W CALLE CONCORDIA ORO VALLEY,AZ 85737 ORO VALLEY,AZ 85737 ORO VALLEY,AZ 85737 PCT: 1005-VA10-05 PCT: 1006-VA10-06 PCT: 1007-VA10-07 PUSCH RIDGE CHRISTIAN CHURCH ST.ELIZABETH ANN SETON CATHOLIC CHURCH GRACE COMMUNITY COVENANT CHURCH SANCTUARY ORGAN PIPE/PALO VERDE ROOMS MULTIPURPOSE ROOM 440 W CALLE CONCORDIA 8650 N SHANNON ROAD 9755 N LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD TUCSON,AZ 85737 TUCSON,AZ 85742 TUCSON,AZ 85742 PCT: 1008-VA10-08 PCT: 1009-VA10-09 PCT: 1010-VA10-10 ST.MARK'S METHODIST CHURCH CASAS ADOBES CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH COMMUNITY CHURCH OF THE FOOHILLS SANCTUARY FELLOWSHIP HALL FELLOWSHIP HALL 1431 W MAGEE ROAD 6801 N ORACLE ROAD 480 E INA ROAD TUCSON,AZ 85704 TUCSON,AZ 85704 TUCSON,AZ 85704 PCT: 1011-VA10-11 PCT: 1012-VA10-12 PCT: 1013-VA10-13 DOVE OF PEACE LUTHERAN CHURCH FOUNTAINS AT LA CHOLLA CHRIST THE KING EPISCOPAL CHURCH SUNDAY SCHOOL ROOM KACHINA ROOM LIBRARY 665 W ROLLER COASTER ROAD 2001 W RUDASILL ROAD 2800 W INA ROAD TUCSON,AZ 85704 TUCSON,AZ 85704 TUCSON,AZ 85741 PCT: 1014-VA10-14.0 PCT: 1014.1 -VA10-14.1 PCT: 1015-VA10-15 HACIENDA DEL RIO APARTMENTS FRIENDLY VILLAGE OF THE CATALINAS AMPHITHEATER BIBLE CHURCH CLUBHOUSE CLUBHOUSE GYMNASIUM 4545 N VIA ENTRADA 101 W RIVER ROAD 226 W PRINCE ROAD TUCSON,AZ 85718 TUCSON,AZ 85715 TUCSON,AZ 85705 PCT: 1016-VA10-16 PCT: 1017-VA10-17 PCT: 1018-VA10-18 MONTE VISTA CHRISTIAN UNION CHURCH FLOWING WELLS ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH TUCSON SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST JR.ACADEMY FELLOWSHIP HALL ROOM#11 MULTIPURPOSE ROOM 1140 E ROGER ROAD 3198 N FLOWING WELLS ROAD 3225 N MARTIN AVENUE TUCSON,AZ 85719 TUCSON,AZ 85705 TUCSON,AZ 85719 1 PCT: 1019-VA10-19 PCT: 1020-VA10-20 PCT: 1021-VA10-21 CORONADO BAPTIST CHURCH ITALIAN-AMERICAN CLUB VISTA DE LA MONTANA UNITED METHODIST CHURCH FELLOWSHIP HALL MAIN HALL WORSHIP CENTER 2609 N PARK AVENUE 2537 N STONE AVENUE 3001 E MIRA VISTA LANE,NORTH OF WILDS ROAD TUCSON,AZ 85719 TUCSON,AZ 85705 TUCSON,AZ 85739 PCT: 1022-VA10-22 PCT: 1301-VA13-01 PCT: 1302-VA13-02 HOLY RESURRECTION ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN LEW SORENSON EDUCATIONAL RESOURCE TANQUE VERDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CHURCH CENTER FELLOWSHIP HALL GOVERNING BOARD ROOM#14 LIBRARY 715 W VANOVER ROAD 11150 E TANQUE VERDE ROAD 2600 N FENIMORE ROAD TUCSON,AZ 85705 TUCSON,AZ 85749 TUCSON,AZ 85749 PCT: 1303-VA13-03 PCT: 1304-VA13-04 PCT: 4001-VA40-01 EMILY GRAY JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL AGUA CALIENTE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SCHUK TOAK DISTRICT MULTIPURPOSE ROOM STAGE-MULTIPURPOSE ROOM DISTRICT COUNCIL CHAMBERS 4201 N MELPOMENE WAY 11420 E LIMBERLOST ROAD HIGHWAY 86,MILE POST 127 TUCSON,AZ 85749 TUCSON,AZ 85749 CROWHANG,AZ 85634 PCT: 4002-VA40-02 PCT: 4003-VA40-03 PCT: 4004-VA40-04 TOHONO O'ODHAM CAPITAL COMPLEX PISINEMO DISTRICT HICKIWAN DISTRICT OFFICE LEGISLATIVE CHAMBERS MAIN ROOM KIOHOD TONLIK KI MAIN STREET PISINEMO RURAL BRANCH VAYA CHIN VILLAGE SELLS,AZ 85634 SELLS,AZ 85634 AJO,AZ 85321 PCT: 4005-VA40-05 PCT: 4006-VA40-06 PCT: 4007-VA40-07 GU VO DISTRICT GU ACHI DISTRICT CHUKUT KUK DISTRICT MULTIPURPOSE BUILDING TAS TONLIK KI SERVICE CENTER GU VO COMMUNITY ROUTE 1 SANTA ROSA VILLAGE INDIAN ROAD#2 AJO,AZ 85321 SELLS,AZ 85634 SELLS,AZ 85634 PCT: 4008-VA40-08 TOPAWA MIDDLE SCHOOL CAFETERIA BIA ROUTE 19 SELLS,AZ 85634 2 Official Polling Place List Consolidated Elections May 16, 2000 18-May-00 PCT: 901-VA09-01 PCT: 902-VA09-02 PCT: 903-VA09-03 SUN CITY VISTOSO/MOUNTAIN VISTA RECREATION RESURRECTION LUTHERAN CHURCH ORO VALLEY TOWN HALL CENTER PAPAGO AND NAVAJO ROOMS FELLOWSHIP HALL 1&2 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1495-A E RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD 11575 N 1ST AVENUE 11000 N LA CANADA DRIVE TUCSON,AZ 85737 ORO VALLEY,AZ 85737 ORO VALLEY,AZ 85737 PCT: 904-VA09-04 PCT: 905-VA09-05 PCT: 1001-VA10-01 ORO VALLEY CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE PUSCH RIDGE CHRISTIAN CHURCH SUN CITY VISTOSO/MOUNTAIN VISTA RECREATION CENTER FELLOWSHIP HALL SANCTUARY PAPAGO AND NAVAJO ROOMS 500 W CALLE CONCORDIA 440 W CALLE CONCORDIA 1495-A E RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD ORO VALLEY,AZ 85737 TUCSON,AZ 85737 TUCSON,AZ 85737 PCT: 1002-VA10-02 PCT: 1003-VA10-03 PCT: 1004-VA10-04 RESURRECTION LUTHERAN CHURCH ORO VALLEY TOWN HALL ORO VALLEY CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE FELLOWSHIP HALL 1&2 COUNCIL CHAMBERS FELLOWSHIP HALL 11575 N 1ST AVENUE 11000 N LA CANADA DRIVE 500 W CALLE CONCORDIA ORO VALLEY,AZ 85737 ORO VALLEY,AZ 85737 ORO VALLEY,AZ 85737 PCT: 1005-VA10-05 PCT: 1006-VA10-06 PCT: 1007-VA10-07 PUSCH RIDGE CHRISTIAN CHURCH ST.ELIZABETH ANN SETON CATHOLIC CHURCH GRACE COMMUNITY COVENANT CHURCH SANCTUARY ORGAN PIPE/PALO VERDE ROOMS MULTIPURPOSE ROOM 440 W CALLE CONCORDIA 8650 N SHANNON ROAD 9755 N LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD TUCSON,AZ 85737 TUCSON,AZ 85742 TUCSON,AZ 85742 PCT: 1008-VA10-08 PCT: 1009-VA10-09 PCT: 1010-VA10-10 ST.MARK'S METHODIST CHURCH CASAS ADOBES CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH COMMUNITY CHURCH OF THE FOOHILLS SANCTUARY FELLOWSHIP HALL FELLOWSHIP HALL 1431 W MAGEE ROAD 6801 N ORACLE ROAD 480 E INA ROAD TUCSON,AZ 85704 TUCSON,AZ 85704 TUCSON.AZ 85704 PCT: 1011-VA10-11 PCT: 1012-VA10-12 PCT: 1013-VA10-13 DOVE OF PEACE LUTHERAN CHURCH FOUNTAINS AT LA CHOLLA CHRIST THE KING EPISCOPAL CHURCH SUNDAY SCHOOL ROOM KACHINA ROOM LIBRARY 665 W ROLLER COASTER ROAD 2001 W RUDASILL ROAD 2800 W INA ROAD TUCSON,AZ 85704 TUCSON,AZ 85704 TUCSON,AZ 85741 PCT: 1014-VA10-14.0 PCT: 1014.1-VA10-14.1 PCT: 1015-VA10-15 HACIENDA DEL RIO APARTMENTS FRIENDLY VILLAGE OF THE CATALINAS AMPHITHEATER BIBLE CHURCH CLUBHOUSE CLUBHOUSE GYMNASIUM 4545 N VIA ENTRADA 101 W RIVER ROAD 226 W PRINCE ROAD TUCSON,AZ 85718 TUCSON,AZ 85715 TUCSON,AZ 85705 PCT: 1016-VA10-16 PCT: 1017-VA10-17 PCT: 1018-VA10-18 MONTE VISTA CHRISTIAN UNION CHURCH FLOWING WELLS ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH TUCSON SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST JR.ACADEMY FELLOWSHIP HALL ROOM#11 MULTIPURPOSE ROOM 1140 E ROGER ROAD 3198 N FLOWING WELLS ROAD 3225 N MARTIN AVENUE TUCSON.AZ 85719 TUCSON,AZ 85705 TUCSON,AZ 85719 1 PCT: 1019-VA10-19 PCT: 1020-VA10-20 PCT: 1021-VA10-21 CORONADO BAPTIST CHURCH ITALIAN-AMERICAN CLUB VISTA DE LA MONTANA UNITED METHODIST CHURCH FELLOWSHIP HALL MAIN HALL WORSHIP CENTER 2609 N PARK AVENUE 2537 N STONE AVENUE 3001 E MIRA VISTA LANE,NORTH OF WILDS ROAD TUCSON,AZ 85719 TUCSON,AZ 85705 TUCSON,AZ 85739 PCT: 1022-VA10-22 PCT: 1301 -VA13-01 PCT: 1302-VA13-02 HOLY RESURRECTION ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN LEW SORENSON EDUCATIONAL RESOURCE TANQUE VERDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CHURCH CENTER FELLOWSHIP HALL GOVERNING BOARD ROOM#14 LIBRARY 715 W VANOVER ROAD 11150 E TANQUE VERDE ROAD 2600 N FENIMORE ROAD TUCSON,AZ 85705 TUCSON,AZ 85749 TUCSON,AZ 85749 PCT: 1303-VA13-03 PCT: 1304-VA13-04 PCT: 4001 -VA40-01 EMILY GRAY JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL AGUA CALIENTE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SCHUK TOAK DISTRICT MULTIPURPOSE ROOM STAGE-MULTIPURPOSE ROOM DISTRICT COUNCIL CHAMBERS 4201 N MELPOMENE WAY 11420 E LIMBERLOST ROAD HIGHWAY 86,MILE POST 127 TUCSON,AZ 85749 TUCSON,AZ 85749 CROWHANG,AZ 85634 PCT: 4002-VA40-02 PCT: 4003-VA40-03 PCT: 4004-VA40-04 TOHONO O'ODHAM CAPITAL COMPLEX PISINEMO DISTRICT HICKIWAN DISTRICT OFFICE LEGISLATIVE CHAMBERS MAIN ROOM KIOHOD TONLIK KI MAIN STREET PISINEMO RURAL BRANCH VAYA CHIN VILLAGE SELLS,AZ 85634 SELLS,AZ 85634 AJO,AZ 85321 PCT: 4005-VA40-05 PCT: 4006-VA40-06 PCT: 4007-VA40-07 GU VO DISTRICT GU ACHI DISTRICT CHUKUT KUK DISTRICT MULTIPURPOSE BUILDING TAS TONLIK KI SERVICE CENTER GU VO COMMUNITY ROUTE 1 SANTA ROSA VILLAGE INDIAN ROAD#2 AJO,AZ 85321 SELLS,AZ 85634 SELLS,AZ 85634 PCT: 4008-VA40-08 TOPAWA MIDDLE SCHOOL CAFETERIA BIA ROUTE 19 SELLS,AZ 85634 2 ELECTION SUMMARY . , Election Summary Report Date:05/18/00 Elections May16 2000 Time:13:04:52 Consolidated Page:1 e:1 of 1 Summary For Town of Oro Valley, All Races ORO VALLEY COUNCIL Vote For: 3 Polling Early TBV Latesr Precincts Reporting 5/5 0/0 0/0 0/0 5/5 100.00% Ballots Cast/Reg. Voters(17389) 4575 822 25 28 5450 31.34% Total Votes 12726 2197 62 7915064 276.40% Times Blank Voted 3 1 0 0 4 0.07% -: Times Over Voted 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Ss Number Of Under Votes 990 266 13 5 1274 23.38% BRYANT,WAYNE 1994 353 12 9 2368 43.45% CONDE,HECTOR 1980 332 13 6 2331 42.77% JOHNSON,RICHARD 2666 443 10 20 3139 57.60% PARISI,PAUL 1495 206 13 11 1725 31.65% ROCHMAN,BART 1978 402 7 9 2396 43.96% WOLFF,WERNER 2594 459 6 24 3083 56.57% Write-in Votes 19 2 1 0 22 0.40% .. -.......,.,2......,,,,,x•'w....:.,v.2•.-' fG f6'::.:Y'1,• ....x.s... VOTING ik.g_ ik. TOTALS Election Summary Report Date:05/18/00 08 Consolidated Elections Ma 16 2000 Time:1 e:1 of y � 1 Page: of 1 Summary For 09-01, All Races ORO VALLEY COUNCIL Vote For: 3 Polling Early TBV Lates 1 Precincts Reporting 1/1 0/0 0/0 0/0 1/1 100.00% Ballots Cast/Reg. Voters(3756) 1654 313 7 61980 52.72% Total Votes 4649 838 20 18 5525 279.04% Times Blank Voted 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% : Times Over Voted 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% s Number Of Under Votes 313 101 1 0 415 20.96% BRYANT,WAYNE 659 113 4 2 778 39.29% CONDE, HECTOR 747 142 4 0 893 45.10% 1 JOHNSON, RICHARD 945 153 3 6 1107 55.91% PARISI,PAUL 335 47 4 3 389 19.65% ROCHMAN,BART 1105 225 3 2 1335 67.42% 1 WOLFF,WERNER 858 158 2 5 1023 51.67% Write-in Votes 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Election Summary Report Date:05/18/00 Time:13:05:09 Consolidated Elections, May 16, 2000 Pag e:1 of 1 Summary For 09-02, All Races ORO VALLEY COUNCIL Vote For: 3 Polling Early TBV Lates 3 Precincts Reporting 1/1 0/0 0/0 0/0 1/1 100.00% Ballots Cast/Reg. Voters(2834) 733 105 4 9 851 30.03% Total Votes 2044 282 10 24 2360 277.32% Times Blank Voted 0 1 0 0 1 0.12% . Times Over Voted 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Number Of Under Votes 155 30 2 3 190 22.33% -F BRYANT,WAYNE 361 56 1 5 423 49.71% CONDE,HECTOR 359 45 2 5 411 48.30% JOHNSON, RICHARD 414 54 2 4 474 55.70% PARISI, PAUL 284 24 0 3 311 36.55% ROCHMAN, BART 227 40 2 1 270 31.73% WOLFF,WERNER 394 63 2 6 465 54.64% Write-in Votes 5 0 1 0 6 0.71% �v a :.v 4. v.:v w.v. ;n.a n.Yi:., {4. na,vn`:•:.v:�n�:..:y:y;:: vv.v..v.: .�.v�� :n wnva.{v vj Nvv na v..:..:v:.�:.v r. :. m xa♦ n n va..avay.aaa aa{i '�'p'f i .: . .:±.^T�^'� \\. . :a.v.....:.v.vF '{•4'::•i:;";y.::..vv:.v.v{:7i:i'I::'r. _...:3z 'r.;s���bxrax�a.�u/�..,� s,,:s•:n:•....�.�, -rss::,,...,.. �:Sxn•}xr. :�:�c�:vxxc,3rar8: rxrz�,cs�afbm�l+�iiz4''.: '/•.xralaa�:�i.v ��x::.:...r�'..�' rr�wm�a`Aca��au�a��e?aaa��a�a.�,a�# i� :3»4� %yWif/,J; ., ,.,,. Election Summary Report Date:05/18/00 Consolidated Elections Ma 2000 Time:13:05:10 y 16, Page.l of l Summary For 09-03, All Races ORO VALLEY COUNCIL Vote For: 3 Polling Early TBV Lates II Precincts Reporting 1/1 0/0 0/0 0/0 1/1 100.00% Ballots Cast/Reg. Voters(6171) 1356 264 12 8 1640 26.58% Total Votes 3748 714 26 24 4512 275.12% Times Blank Voted 3 0 0 0 3 0.18% Times Over Voted 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Number Of Under Votes 311 78 10 0 399 24.33% BRYANT,WAYNE 592 113 5 1 711 43.35% CONDE,HECTOR 514 91 5 0 610 37.20% JOHNSON, RICHARD 856 167 5 7 1035 63.11% PARISI,PAUL 592 99 7 3 701 42.74% ROCHMAN, BART 363 88 2 5 458 27.93% <' WOLFF,WERNER 820 154 2 8 984 60.00% Write-in Votes 11 2 0 0 13 0.79% ....:.:� :: : :•: .4,.:•.: . �:/: :.....x...;."'•"-V„-• ,. :.....:,:.., d.r,x.::.• ,, :•. v,• d2..4£��HY.........:n:fx..:v4.:.. : .... ...:s.•:...:P. ::..::32�h v.:4iyw:: • cb% r � �Q > : ,r,,,•,.i }: ,.:,...9Y.f.. . 5,�J1.;7 �'/C.:;;' Election Summary Report Date:05/18/00 Consolidated Elections Ma 16, 2000 Time:13:05: 0 ' y Page:l of 1 Summary For 09-04, All Races ORO VALLEY COUNCIL Vote For: 3 Polling Early TBV Lates i Precincts Reporting 1/1 0/0 0/0 0/0 1/1 100.00% Ballots Cast/Reg. Voters(2680) 469 93 0 4 566 21.12% Total Votes 1294 243 0 12 1549 273.67% Times Blank Voted 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Times Over Voted 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% s. Number Of Under Votes 113 36 0 0 149 26.33% BRYANT,WAYNE 185 38 0 1 224 39.58% CONDE, HECTOR 177 32 0 1210 37.10% '< JOHNSON, RICHARD 283 51 0 3 337 59.54% PARISI, PAUL 165 27 0 2 194 34.28% ROCHMAN, BART 170 37 0 1 208 36.75% WOLFF,WERNER 312 58 0 4 374 66.08% Write-in Votes 2 0 0 0 2 0.35% ...;ick .y .n.......:.,.w.x -,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,m,„.,♦.nr:::mwtJ ... .. yk N� .��s . ; ..Ka,,.:..v::s:k.:•:x: yf..<::r} ..-,:',Alia.,,,' ^"...vv` :�:;.. 5.. , y�::,.s. yu �44,mauz" ;'.:.6%:a-�6 `••;r `a >,�f,f //f?/�n.; W?3 ✓,.i/;r;•r<:. Election Summary Report Date:05/18/00 Consolidated Elections Ma 16 2000 Time:13:05:11 ' y Pagel of 1 Summary For 09-05, All Races ORO VALLEY COUNCIL Vote For: 3 Polling Early TBV Lates Precincts Reporting 1/1 0/0 0/0 0/0 1/1 100.00% Ballots Cast/Reg. Voters (1948) 363 47 2 1 413 21.20% Total Votes 991 120 6 1 1118 270.70% A Times Blank Voted 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Times Over Voted 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% k Number Of Under Votes 98 21 0 2 121 29.30% :s BRYANT.WAYNE 197 33 2 0 232 56.17% CONDE,HECTOR 183 22 2 0 207 50.12% JOHNSON,RICHARD 168 18 0 0 186 45.04% PARISI,PAUL 119 9 2 0 130 31.48% ROCHMAN,BART 113 12 0 0 125 30.27% WOLFF,WERNER 210 26 0 1 237 57.38% Write-in Votes 1 0 0 0 1 0.24% =WM,.*446CR2kY> " 'X.iY2{a*.&$,eL�S�;iMakiavd.t.�dR51i.L"':,.. .:-';';',;,',QMi:: .^>.2�2: 2bi'..L',.3237.:'i401a141;;..S:AR.£%'d/11.ffGv/�t'Rr"Y,e4' ,;•/- .,. f•••: STATEiviNI: Of VOTES CAST Statement of Votes Cast Date:05/18/00 9 Consolidated Elections Ma 16 2000 Time:l e: of y � 3 Page:1 of 3 TURN OUT J � � > Jurisdiction Wide 09-01 3756 1980 52.72% 09-02 2834 851 30.03% 09-03 6171 1640 26.58% 09-04 2680 566 21.12% 09-05 1948 413 21.20% 17389 5450 31.34% Statement of Votes Cast Date:05/18/00 Consolidated Elections, May16, 2000 Time:13:o9:s9 Page:2 of 3 ORO VAI.I.FY COUNCIL w cd -v v 0O zrx IC � y j Q U U -4 < ,., 3 w CC - ; o E; = z oa. > U > ` ¢ Q c z t, E "g E -8 Jurisdiction Wide 09-01 3756 1980 5525 0 415 0 778 893 1107 389 1335 09-02 2834 851 2360 0 190 1 423 411 474 311 270 09-03 6171 1640 4512 0 399 3 711 610 1035 701 458 09-04 2680 566 1549 0 149 0 224 210 337 194 208 09-05 1948 413 1118 0 121 0 232 207 186 130 125 17389 5450 15064 0 1274 4 2368 2331 3139 1725 2396 Statement of Votes Cast Date:05/18/00 Consolidated Elections, Ma 16 2000 Time:13:09:59 y Page:3 of 3 ORO VA J EY COUNCIL CL z w ti 3 ° Jurisdiction Wide 09-01 1023 0 09-02 465 6 09-03 984 13 09-04 374 2 09-05 237 1 3083 22 EXHIBIT 'A' 2 MAY 22, 2000 PUBLIC HEARING ON NOTICE OF INTENT TO INCREASE TOWN WIDE ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE Public Notice of Intent to Increase Oro Valley Town-wide Roadway Development Impact Fee Purpose of Public Report: The purpose of this Public Report on the Oro Valley Town-wide Roadway Development Impact Fee is to provide all documentation to the public that supports the assessment of an increased town-wide roadway development impact fee within the town limits of Oro Valley. This Public Report is published and available to the public at least thirty (30) days prior to intention by the Town to assess an increased town-wide roadway development impact fee. Pursuant to Arizona Revised Statute 9-463.05, the Town of Oro Valley shall conduct a public hearing on the proposed increased town-wide roadway development impact fee after the expiration of the thirty date notice and at least fourteen (14) days prior to the scheduled date of adoption of the proposed increased fee by the Town of Oro Valley Town Council. The public hearing on the proposed increased town-wide roadway development impact fee is scheduled for May 22 , 2000. The Town Council shall schedule the proposed increased town-wide roadway development impact fee for consideration and adoption for a date at least 14 days following the public hearing. Notice of Town Council consideration and adoption of the proposed increased town-wide roadway development impact fee shall be forthcoming. Overview of Current Ordinance: In 1994, the Town of Oro Valley adopted its original development impact fee ordinance for the reconstruction of La Canada Drive from Naranja Drive to Lambert Lane'. A fee of $1,035.00 was imposed on an area of the Town that would directly benefit from the improvement. The ordinance was amended in 1997 to include the entire Town, with a fee of $1,494.00 per single-family residence.2 Representatives of the development community were concerned that the fee would result in a downturn in home building in the Town, but the pace of construction has actually increased over time. In 1998, the PAG Regional Council unanimously adopted the Metropolitan Transportation Plan that includes roadway impact fees of $2,500.00 as a key element for funding transportation improvements region wide. The Town has been accumulating badly needed funds for major roadway projects. From Fiscal Year 1996-97 through 1998-99, the Town collected $3.1 million in development impact fees, as detailed below: 1 Prior to adopting the fee, the Town Council adopted a roadway performance standard of Level of Service D, engineering design standards, and arterial roadway cross sections. 2 The full development impact fee per "equivalent demand unit" (EDU) is $1,614 (Ordinance No. (0)97-02, Section 13-4-4). Adjustments per Section 13-3-2 resulted in a reduced fee of $1,494 per EDU. Page 1 of 7 • FY 1996-97: $0.34 million • FY 1997-98: $1.23 million • FY 1998-99: $1.56 million To date, the Town has spent a total of $1.27 million in development impact fees, mostly for reconstructing La Canada Drive between Lambert Lane and Naranja. Most of the current fund balance is earmarked for the widening of La Canada Drive south of Lambert Lane in a cooperative project with Pima County. Impact fees have also been used for the purchase of right-of-way for the La Canada Drive Extension, Moore Road to Tangerine Road, and for traffic signalization improvements on 1st Avenue. Need for an Update: The roadway development impact fee should be updated periodically to account for changes in travel demand and the increasing cost of building new roads and widening existing roadways to serve new development. Since the last update was more than three years ago, staff requested that a consultant team review and update the roadway development impact fee. Ordinance Update Process: The statutory process for updating the Ordinance and revising the fee is identical to creating a new ordinance, and is summarized below. The entire statute (ARS 9-463.05), attached, is very short. Also attached is a modified version of the statute that could be considered as a simplified text potentially replacing the current ordinance. ✓ Provide at least thirty days' advance notice of intention to assess a new or increased development fee ✓ Release to the public a written report including all documentation that supports the assessment of a new or increased development fee. ✓ Conduct a public hearing on the proposed new or increased development fee at any time after the expiration of the thirty day notice of intent and at least fourteen days prior to the scheduled date of adoption of the new or increased fee by the governing body. ✓ The development fee shall not be effective until ninety days after its formal adoption by the governing body of the municipality. Technical Analysis: The prior analysis utilized the "consumption" method, which takes into account the travel patterns of Oro Valley residents within the Town and the cost to provide additional roadway capacity for newcomers. The development impact fee for roadways was calculated by multiplying the roadway capacity consumed by a typical single-family residence, which represents the "equivalent demand unit", or EDU, by the unit cost to build that capacity. Some adjustments were also included in the calculation to take into account and credit for related transportation fees and taxes, including gasoline and vehicle license taxes, which are paid by newcomers and go in part to construction of new roadway capacity. The bottom line was a development impact fee of $1,494 per Page 2 of 7 EDU. Note that this fee is dedicated to construction of new capacity3 only and cannot be used for maintenance of roadways or resolving existing deficiencies. The consultant review of the methodology shows that the original analysis remains valid and need not be revised. Travel patterns have not changed substantially over the past three years. However, the cost of building roadway capacity has increased due to higher labor and materials costs, an abundance of work available to road builders resulting in a tight labor market, inflation, environmental mitigation costs, and other factors. Accordingly, the fee could be adjusted based on the higher construction costs without changing the roadway capacity consumption analysis.4 Level of Service Analysis: During the Mayor and Council study session on raising the fee, a question arose regarding the appropriate roadway performance standard for the Town of Oro Valley. Level of service is the qualitative description of roadway performance. Much like academic grades, LOS is defined in a range from A to F, with A representing free flowing traffic and F representing severe congestion. Urban areas typically adopt LOS D as their peak-period performance standard in recognition that some congestion is acceptable during "rush hours", and that free flow is anticipated during the rest of the day. Indeed, the Pima Association of Governments adopted the LOS D criteria in its Mobility Management Plan.5 The standard permits LOS D performance on Oro Valley arterial roadways, and is used regionally to prioritize roadway projects and forecast regional air quality. If the Town adopted a different service standard — LOS C for example — it would need to provide arterial widening and intersection improvements sooner and more often than would be needed by LOS D. This has very significant implications on capital costs, particularly when a six-lane roadway would be needed instead of a four-lane roadway.6 Previous studies indicate that LOS C would result in a roadway capital cost up to twice as high as LOS D, with concomitant increases in maintenance costs. LOS C would result in less congestion during rush hours, but would have no discernible benefit during the other 22 hours of a typical weekday. The higher standard could also necessitate the installation of grade-separated intersections (GSI) at major arterial/arterial intersections because the standard might not be achievable by traditional at 3 Widening existing roads, making operational improvements such as traffic signals, and building new roads are examples of ways to provide additional capacity. 4 In the future, the entire technical analysis may need to be re-done if the Town limits change significantly or if there are other changes in traffic patterns or travel demand. The MMP is PAG's version of the federally mandated congestion management system. It was unanimously adopted in 1993 by the PAG Regional Council, which includes representation by the Town of Oro Valley. The MMP establishes LOS D for most of the region. Exceptions include the University and Downtown areas (LOS E) and main access routes to Tucson International Airport {LOS C). As an example, using LOS C, roadways with more than 24,000 vehicles per day would need to be six-lanes wide, instead of four lanes. This would immediately impact the current plans for First Avenue south of Tangerine Road and La Canada Drive south of Lambert Lane. Page 3 of 7 grade intersections. GSIs cost up to $30 million to build compared with a traditional intersection cost of about $2 million to $3 million each. Roadway Construction Costs Evaluation Methodology: The consultant team assessed the current cost of construction by contacting other agencies in the metropolitan area to determine their actual costs to design and build contemporary four-lane arterial roadways. The attached table summarizes some roadway improvement costs in Oro Valley and Pima County. Roadways constructed in Pima County have actually averaged over $6.3 million7 per mile. Based on this analysis, the revised roadway construction cost for the Oro Valley area is expected to be $6,306,640 per mile to construct a contemporary 4-lane divided roadway versus $4,736,000 in the current ordinance. This results in an increase of the gross fee to $2,128, per EDU and a net fee of $2,008 after an approximate credit of $120 is applied. This represents an increase of 34 percent over the fee resulting from the 1996 analysis. If the Council approves this increase, minor changes to the text of the current ordinance would be needed. The proposed changes are attached. The amount of the credit will remain at the same $120 level. Next Steps: Town Council has scheduled the public hearing on the proposed increased town-wide roadway development impact fee for May 22, 2000. Following the public hearing, the Town Council shall schedule the proposed increased town-wide roadway development impact fee for consideration and adoption for a date at least 14 days after the public hearing. 7 The projects were built between 1994 and 2000. Accordingly, the project costs have been adjusted to year 2000 dollars. 8 The calculation is thus: ((($6,306,640/32,000) x 10.8) - $120) = $2,008.49; where $6,306,640 is the cost to construct a typical mile of four lane arterial, 32,000 is the daily capacity at Level of Service D, and 10.8 is the average Oro Valley arterial vehicle miles traveled per EDU per day. Each typical household is credited $120 for the portion of gasoline and vehicle license taxes paid in one year which is typically used for roadway capital improvements. Page 4 of 7 ARS 9-463.05. Development fees; imposition by cities and towns A. A municipality may assess development fees to offset costs to the municipality associated with providing necessary public services to a development. B. Development fees assessed by a municipality under this section are subject to the following requirements: 1. Development fees shall result in a beneficial use to the development. 2. Monies received from development fees assessed pursuant to this section shall be placed in a separate fund and accounted for separately and may only be used for the purposes authorized by this section. Interest earned on monies in the separate fund shall be credited to the fund. 3. The schedule for payment of fees shall be provided by the municipality. The municipality shall provide a credit toward the payment of a development fee for the required dedication of public sites and improvements provided by the developer for which that development fee is assessed. The developer of residential dwelling units shall be required to pay development fees when construction permits for the dwelling units are issued. 4. The amount of any development fees assessed pursuant to this section must bear a reasonable relationship to the burden imposed upon the municipality to provide additional necessary public services to the development. The municipality, in determining the extent of the burden imposed by the development, shall consider, among other things, the contribution made or to be made in the future in cash by taxes, fees or assessments by the property owner towards the capital costs of the necessary public service covered by the development fee. 5. If development fees are assessed by a municipality, such fees shall be assessed in a non- discriminatory manner. 6. In determining and assessing a development fee applying to land in a community facilities district established under title 48, chapter 4, article 6, the municipality shall take into account all public infrastructure provided by the district and capital costs paid by the district for necessary public services and shall not assess a portion of the development fee based on the infrastructure or costs. C. A municipality shall give at least thirty days' advance notice of intention to assess a new or increased development fee and shall release to the public a written report including all documentation that supports the assessment of a new or increased development fee. The municipality shall conduct a public hearing on the proposed new or increased development fee at any time after the expiration of the thirty day notice of intention to assess a new or increased development fee and at least fourteen days prior to the scheduled date of adoption of the new or increased fee by the governing body. A development fee assessed pursuant to this section shall not be effective until ninety days after its formal adoption by the governing body of the municipality. Nothing in this subsection shall affect any development fee adopted prior to July 24, 1982. Page 5 of 7 Town of Oro Valley Development Fees (Draft Simplified Text) A. The Town of Oro Valley ordains to assess development fees to offset costs to the Town associated with providing necessary public services to a development. Complete description of general provisions, procedures for adoption of development fees, administration, and the town-wide road development fee are provided in the Town of Oro Valley Town Code, Chapter 13 (attached). B. Development fees assessed by the Town of Oro Valley under this section are subject to the following requirements: 1. Development fees shall result in a beneficial use to the development. 2. Monies received from development fees assessed pursuant to this section shall be placed in a separate fund and accounted for separately and may only be used for the purposes authorized by this section. Interest earned on monies in the separate fund shall be credited to the fund. 3. The schedule for payment of fees shall be provided by the Town of Oro Valley. The Town of Oro Valley shall provide a credit toward the payment of a development fee for the required dedication of public sites and improvements provided by the developer for which that development fee is assessed. The developer of residential dwelling units shall be required to pay development fees when construction permits for the dwelling units are issued. 4. The amount of any development fees assessed pursuant to this section must bear a reasonable relationship to the burden imposed upon the Town of Oro Valley to provide additional necessary public services to the development. The Town of Oro Valley, in determining the extent of the burden imposed by the development, shall consider, among other things, the contribution made or to be made in the future in cash by taxes, fees or assessments by the property owner towards the capital costs of the necessary public service covered by the development fee. 5. The Town of Oro Valley shall assess development fees in a non-discriminatory manner. 6. In determining and assessing a development fee applying to land in a community facilities district established under title 48, chapter 4, article 6, the Town of Oro Valley shall take into account all public infrastructure provided by the district and capital costs paid by the district for necessary public services and shall not assess a portion of the development fee based on the infrastructure or costs. C. The Town of Oro Valley shall give at least thirty days' advance notice of intention to assess a new or increased development fee and shall release to the public a written report including all documentation that supports the assessment of a new or increased development fee. The Town of Oro Valley shall conduct a public hearing on the proposed new or increased development fee at any time after the expiration of the thirty day notice of intention to assess a new or increased development fee and at least fourteen days prior to the scheduled date of adoption of the new or increased fee by the governing body. A development fee assessed pursuant to this section shall not be effective until ninety days after its formal adoption by the governing body of the Town of Oro Valley. Nothing in this subsection shall affect any development fee adopted prior to July 24, 1982. Page 6 of 7 Area Roadway Project Costs 14-Mar-00 Design! Planning Total Cost Year Construction Right-of- Const. Cost(TAP, (Current Total Cost Project Description Completed Length Cost Way Admin. EA/MR,etc) Year$) (Year 2000$) Cost per Mile Ina/Skyline,Oracle to C.V. 1994 2.2 $ 7,900,000 $ 651,000 $3,533,000 $ 237,000 $12,321,000 $ 15,589,996 $ 7,086,362 From 2 to 4 lanes divided River Road,La Cholla 2000 1.1 $ 4,500,000 $ 16,000 $ 900,000 $ 135,000 $ 5,551,000 $ 5,551,000 $ 5,046,364 to La Canada (Includes$1.0 million for La Cholla intersection reconstruction and signalization) From 2 to 4 lanes divided 1st Avenue,River Road 2001 2.0 $11,000,000 $ 756,500 $2,200,000 $ 330,000 $14,286,500 $ 13,715,040 $ 6,857,520 to Orange Grove Road (Includes significant costs for water,drainage,and noise wall) From 2 to 4 lanes divided La Canada Drive Reconstruct 1998 1.0 $ 2,000,000 $ - $ 440,000 $ 80,000 $ 2,520,000 $ 2,620,800 $ 2,620,800 Lambert to Naranja From 2 to 4 lanes divided La Canada Drive Extension, 2010 approx. 1.1 $ 3,490,000 $ 500,000 (1 $1,200,000 $ 104,700 $ 5,294,700 $ 5,506,488 $ 5,005,898 Tangerine to Moore Rd From 0 to 4 lanes divided All Projects Total Cost 7.4 $ 42,983,324 $ 5,808,557 Adjusted Project Costs(2) 6.4 $ 40,362,524 $ 6,306,644 Recommended Unit Cost 1-3-673W,Tal Source: Pima County Department of Transportation,Town of Oro Valley Note: Project costs have been grown(or deflated)by 4 percent per year from completion year to adjust to constant year 2000 dollars. (1) Revised estimate based on recent right-of-way acquisition activities Original estimate of$1.1 million contained within the La Canada Drive Extension,July 1999 report (2) Excludes La Canada Drive reconstruction due to its atypical nature,wherein no right-of-way was necessary and higher Town roadway standards have been adopted since its completion. Page 7 of 7 BUDGET REVIEW STUDY SESSION ITEMS I -A MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Chuck Sweet, Town Manager et - David Andrews, Finance Director- � DATE: May 19, 2000 SUBJ: Follow-up Issues from May 10 Budget Review Session A number of issues were raised during the Mayor and Council's Budget Review Session of May 10. This memorandum serves as staff follow-up to those issues. 1. Issue: Community Development Administration —Administrative Assistant Response: Title changed to Secretary IV. The Director has indicated that the actual salary should be $26,104 in lieu of the budgeted $36,774. This results in a cost savings of$12,233 including social security and related retirement contributions. 2. Issue: Community Development Administration — Secretary II and Clerk/Receptionist positions Response: Title for existing Clerk/Receptionist changed to Secretary II; no financial impact. Added Clerk/Receptionist (Additional cost of $21,171). 3. Issue: GOVAC Financial Participation Agreement Response: Town funding tentatively increased by $20,000 to arrive at total funding of$80,000. GOVAC will include performance measurements in its upcoming proposed contract as well as information demonstrating the progress being made by the organization. 4. Issue: Geographic Information System (GIS) Response: Staff will pursue passing along development associated costs to developers. Staff is also preparing a summary report concerning GIS for Council discussion on May 24. 5. Issue: Summary of Development Services revenues and expenses Response: Please refer to the attached chart. 6. Issue: Construction start dates for 4-Star and 5-Star Hotels/ Contract Inspectors Response: This item will be discussed in detail in Agenda Item 1 B. 7. Issue: Fire Extinguishers in all Town Vehicles Response: Staff will research and implement this suggestion. 8. Issue: Building Safety— Policy for Staffing Requirements Response: This issue will be considered by the Council separately from the budget process. 9. Issue: Parks & Recreation/Public Works Landscape Maintenance Contract Response: Staff will examine the operational feasibility of transferring the roadway median maintenance portion of the contract from Parks & Recreation to Public Works. 10. Issue: Validity of the price of rakes at $50 each Response: The actual price of the rakes is about $50 each, they are high quality, commercial grade tools and have proven to be the most cost effective per Parks & Recreation. 11. Issue: Funding for Pusch Ridge Majesty Art Project Response: Oro Valley's total commitment is $15,000. The artist was paid $5,000 on 5/26/99 (last fiscal year). An additional $5,000 was paid on 2/29/00 and $5,000 remains to be paid. The remaining payment is included in the current year's estimated actual expenses for Community Development Administration. 12. Issue: Linda Vista Trail - Land Acquisition Response: Funding for trail acquisition has not been included in the budget as presented. A cost estimate will be developed and presented to the Council at the May 31 budget review session. 13. Issue: West Lambert Lane Park/Unfunded CIP Items Listing Response: Please refer to the attached listing. 14. Issue: In-line Skating Facilities Response: Parks & Recreation will explore this issue during the upcoming fiscal year. 15. Issue: Council's Budget Discussion of Capital Projects Response: The following items will be added to the May 31 Budget Study Session Agenda. Time Item 8:30 Dennis Weaver Pool Renovation 8:50 Linda Vista Trail Land Acquisition 9:05 Library Construction 16. Issue: Library Operations & Maintenance — Cost Sharing with Pima County Response: The Community Development Director will begin discussions with the County regarding this issue. Staff appreciates the opportunity to review these items with the Town Council. CC: Brent Sinclair, Community Development Director Bryant Nodine, Planning & Zoning Administrator Terry Vosler, Building Safety Administrator Ainsley Reeder, Parks & Recreation Administrator Kathi Cuvelier, Town Clerk Bob Weede, GOVAC Town of Oro Valley Development Services Revenues and Expenses FY 2000-2001 Budgeted Revenues: Residential Building Permits $948,000 Commercial Building Permits 600,000 Other Permits & Fees 156,100 Total Revenues $1,704,100 Budgeted Expenses: Planning & Zoning $1,633,850 Building Safety 1,281,941 Total Expenses $2,915,791 Revenues do not include an estimated $2.7M in construction sales tax. Town of Oro Valley FY 2000-01 Unfunded CIP Items West Lambert Lane Park $50,000* Administration Building Expansion 300,000 Global Positioning System 20,000* Interactive Voice Response System 35,000* Voice Recognition Software System 21,000 Total $426,000 * Projects not included in recommended budget. MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Chuck Sweet, Town Manager David Andrews, Finance Director I• DATE: May 22, 2000 SUBJ: Geographic Information System (GIS) This memorandum serves as staff follow-up to the GIS issues that were raised during the Council's budget review session on May 10. Attached to this memorandum you will find a summary report that outlines the purpose, scope, benefits, current status and budgetary impact of GIS. The budget currently includes $191,220 for GIS of which $137,220 is included in the General Fund. The Town Manager's Recommendation also includes $12,000 in consultants for Sierra Permitting applications. The Manager and Finance Director recommend redirecting this funding towards a GIS consultant to prepare a comprehensive long-range GIS master plan. Town of Oro Valley Geographic Information Systems Cost Summary FY 2000-2001 Budgeting Process Department Town Budget Manager's Department Item Description Request Recommendation Police Department ArcView Training (3 x $300) $ 900.00 * Crime Data Mapping Training $ 2,500.00 *1 • ArcView Licenses(3) $ 750.00 $ 750.00 Map View Licenses(2) $ 1,100.00 $ 1,100.00 Crime Analysis Mapping $ 18,000.00 $ - — Plotter/Printer HP 450C $ 3,800.00 $ - Subtotal Police $ 27,050.00 $ 1,850.00 Planning &Zoning GIS Analyst(Existing Position) $ 46,670.00 $ 46,670.00 — GIS Technician (Requested New Position) $ 41,781.00 $ - Advanced Visual Basic Training $ 1,500.00 * Map Object Training $ 1,500.00 * Access Development Training $ 500.00 * GPS Training for Staff $ 2,000.00 * Aerial Photo Update $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 - su..ort $ 400.00 $ •88 es Consultants-Sierra Permitting Applications $ 12,000.00 $ 12,000.00 0 _-r"'Far .8 erva ion- - $ 40.00 " T --- Visual Basic Upgrade $ 500.00 $ 500.00 Map Objects LT 2 Upgrade , $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 Eagle Info.Viewpoint Transport $ 400.00 $ 400.00 — Sierra Licenses for Additonal Personnel $ 5,000.00 $ 3,965.00 Palm Tops, accessories& Sierra tie-in software $ 7,500.00 $ 7,500.00 — GPS (Unfunded CIP) $ 20,000.00 $ - 4Arclnfo License Maintenance $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 ESRI Conference $ 1,500.00 — Intermediate ArcView(13 @ $330) $ 4,290.00 * AutoCad (3 @$450) $ 1,350.00 * ArcView licenses for new personnel (9 @ $700) $ 6,300.00 $ 2,100.00 ArcView upgrades(13 @$295) $ 3,835.00 $ 3,835.00 ArcView upgrade and tech support $ 600.00. $ 600.00 ,-- ArcView Spatial Analyst upgrade $ 700.00 $ 700.00 Autodesk(CAD)viewer(4 @$300) $ 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00 — GIS Technician NT Workstation- New Position $ 3,000.00 $ - GPS Unit and descrabler(to be shared with DPVV) $ 13,000.00 $ - Subtotal Planning&Zoning $ 229,566.00 $ 133,870.00 Building Safety ArcView maintenance agreement $ 1,650.00 $ 1,500.00 ArcView Training (5) $ 1,650.00 Subtotal Building Safety $ 3,300.00 $ 1,500.00 Economic Development ArcView Licenses(2) $ 1,350.00. $ - ArcView Upgrades (2) $ 900.00 $ - Subtotal Economic Development $ 2,250.00 $ - Information Systems GIS Technical Support-Global Systems Modeling $ 395.00 $ - .GIS &CAD Workstation (2) $ 5,000.00 $ - ArcView Software Licenses(4) $ 2,648.00 $ - ArcView Upgrade Subscription (4) $ 1,180.00 $ - ' ArcView Image Analyst $ 2,071.00 $ - ArcView 3D Analyst $ 2,071.00 $ - v ArcView Spacial Analyst $ 2,071.00 $ - ArcView Network Analyst $ 1,241.00 $ - AutoCAD Land Development w/Upgrade Subscription $ 3,453.00 $ AutoCAD Civil Design w/Upgrade Subscription $ 2,246.00 $ - ( AutoCAD Survey w/Upgrade Subscription ` $ 826.00 $ - Autodesk Viewer(10) $ 360.00 $ - HP DesignJet 1050C Large Format Printer 7,941.00 $ - Microfische Replacement Multimedia Workstation $ 4,000.00 $ - Adobe Photoshop Upgrade `$ 150.00 $ - Subtotal Information Systems $ 35,653.00 $ - Subtotal General Fund $ 297,819.00 $ 137,220.00 Water Utility Global Positioning Training $ 5,100.00 $ - Land Surveyor- GPS • $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 GPS Mapping Equipment $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 GPS Software $ 7,000.00 $ 7,000.00 Subtotal Water Utility • $ 47,100.00 $ 42,000.00 i Public Works- Highway Fund GIS Equipment $ 12,000.00 $ 12,000.00 Subtotal Public Works • $ 12,000.00 $ 12,000.00 Transit Division ArcView Training (Beg. & Int.) $ 1,500.00 $ - Subtotal Transit $ 1,500.00 $ - Total All Departments ' $ 358,419.00$ 191,220.00 * Funding may be included in the budget depending on departmental priorities. 1-B MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Chuck Sweet, Town Manage €21_,, David Andrews, Finance Director DATE: May 19, 2000 SUBJ: May 22, 2000 Budget Review Session — Item 1B Review and Discussion Regarding Revised General Fund Revenue Budget Estimates for FY 2000/01 At the Council's Budget Review Session on May 10, staff was directed to review the estimated construction start dates for the 4-Star and 5-Star resort hotels, specifically with regard to their budgetary impact to the Building Safety Division. The following outlines the results of that review. The estimated and budgeted construction start date for the 5-Star resort is November 1, 2000. The Economic Development Administrator has indicated this date is still a good assumption. The estimated and budgeted construction start date for the 4-Star resort is June 1, 2000. Pursuant to discussion with the developer, the Economic Development Administrator has indicated that the developer does not have financing for the project and recommends deletion of all construction sales tax ($312,000) and commercial building permit fees ($180,000) for FY 2000-01. The Building Safety Administrator has recommended that $105,000 be deleted from the Building Safety Division budget (Contract building inspector $50K and $55K outside professional services for plan review) as a result of the 4- Star Resort. The following is the status of the budget based on this new information: Recurring deficit as originally presented $454,765 Community Development — Increased Personnel 8,938 GOVAC Funding 20,000 Decrease in Revenue Estimates 492,000 Building Safety Reductions <105,000> FOP Recommendation 101,050 Revised Deficit $971,753 The Town Manager and Finance Director are recommending that reductions be made to the Town budget to limit the deficit to at least the original amount of $454,765. Budgetary adjustments may be considered mid fiscal year, depending on the Towns financial status over the next five to seven months. I i , , . . 2 TOWN OF ORO GALLEY 0\c.,--0 '4'3, COUNCIL COMMUNICATION STUDY SESSION DATE: , 2000 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL FROM: William A. Jansen, P.E., Town Engineer SUBJECT: Review and recommendations concerning the establishment of a Stormwater Management Utility Summary: Since the incorporation of the Town of Oro Valley in 1974, the Town has not had a specific program to deal with the many issues associated with stormwater and associated flooding. The continued growth of the Town has compounded the problems associated with stormwater. In recognition of this issue, the Town has embarked on a town-wide drainage basin study to establish a stormwater management program and identify steps that need to be taken to reduce the adverse impacts of stormwater on the citizens and their property. The Town of Oro Valley must comply with the Phase II requirements of the Federal Clean water Act through the EPA managed National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). This is an un-funded federal mandate that requires the Town to establish a stormwater/pollution management and reduction program by 2003. The NPDES program requires the Town to initiate and/or follow the requirements of the NPDES program. The cost to implement the NPDES program is estimated to be in excess of $200,000.00 and it will have an estimated annual program operating cost in excess of$150.000.00 per year. At present, the Town does not have a funding source outside of the general fund to fund the NPDES program or any town-wide drainage improvement program. The concept of a stormwater utility has been used by many communities throughout the United States to fund their stormwater management program and institute their NPDES program. The Department of Public Works will present the stormwater utility concept to the Mayor and Council for their consideration. Attachment: 1. Preliminary Stormwater Utility Feasibility Study E.t)IL:— — De.. /ent Head i` iiA . .4._(410 4 Town Manager TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PRELIMINARY STORMWATER UTILITY FEASIBILITY STUDY Prepared for: The Town of Oro Valley Public Works Department 680 W. Calle Concordia Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 Prepared by: JE FULLER t1YDROORDfIOIOGY. MC. In Association with: C4 L t&A Curtis Lueck&Associates And Frank Cassidy, Attorney-at-Law March 2000 Town of Oro Valley Preliminary Stormwater Utility Feasibility Assessment • Page ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction/Overview 1 Stormwater Management 2 How much stormwater? 2 What kind of stormwater? 2 Level of Service 2 The Town Wide Drainage Study 2 NPDES Phase II Regulations 3 Requirements 3 Permitting Deadline and Approval 4 Penalties 4 Regional NPDES Programs 5 Benefits to Public 5 Costs 6 Funding 6 Funding Source Evaluation Matrix 7 Stormwater Utility 10 Legal Basis 10 Structure 10 References 12 Attachments 12 Town of Oro Valley Preliminary Stormwater Utility Feasibility Assessment Page 1 Introduction/Overview The Town of Oro Valley was incorporated in 1974. At that time the City was a community of less than 2,000 people. By 1997, the Town's population had grown to over 20,000. With that increase in population has come homes and businesses that increase the amount and quality of runoff across yards and into roads and drainageways. The Town has historically dealt with larger flooding issues, such as flooding along the Canada del Oro Wash, on an as-needed basis. However, local drainage concerns have gone largely unaddressed, as the town has experienced its rapid growth during the last 25 years. Today,there are hundreds of homes and businesses located along natural and improved drainageways in the Town. Many of these drainageways were built before there were standards for drainage. Many are also privately owned and not within the jurisdiction of the Town to enter and maintain when needed. As development occurs, runoff from paved and other impervious areas increases, causing ponds and areas of flowing water where little or none had occurred in the past. This can create problems ranging from the nuisance category, like getting out of your car after a rain storm in a parking lot with six inches of standing water, to real hazards to health, such as getting ones car caught in a swiftly flowing roadway crossing and being swept off the road. To compound the problem, decreasing stormwater quality has been identified as a pervasive national problem by the federal government through its National Pollution Discharge Elimination System(NPDES). The NPDES program prescribes programs and regulations that communities in certain urban areas must meet to improve stormwater quality and reduce the degradation of the nation's waterways. The result of the above happenings has been the development of a system of stormwater infrastructure that has gone largely unattended and unaccounted for in the development of the Town. The Town has historically been unable to address the growing problems associated with this system due to a lack of dedicated funding and manpower to deal with the system. This condition is expected to worsen with the recent inclusion of the Town in a listing prepared by the Environmental Protection Agency of communities required to meet the requirements of the recent NPDES program Phase II requirements. Town of Oro Valley Preliminary Stormwater Utility Feasibility Assessment Page 2 Stormwater Management What is stormwater management? Simply put, stormwater management is the program that a community uses to insure that the storm runoff from urban areas is treated and conveyed so as to protect the safety, property and convenience of its residents and the quality of the stream environment that the runoffdrains into. Although such a program may seem simple at first glance, there are many aspects of providing adequate provision for stormwater that can become complicated and costly. The following paragraphs discuss some issues for consideration. How much stormwater? A community needs to have a method of determining how much stormwater runoffwill occur during different types of storms. This process involves scientific and engineering measurements and calculations by professionals trained in the field of hydrology. What kind of stormwater? As a community develops it may see all types of land surfaces that affect water quality such as pavement, landscaping and even grass lawns. In addition, different commercial and industrial land uses can generate pollutants such as oils, greases, solvents and heavy metals that can find their way into storm drains. The community needs to consider the type of water quality it wants to have within its streams and washes and develop technical standards and requirements to insure that level of quality. Level of Service What kind of protection from stormwater does the community want? Do the residents want protection from only the most hazardous floods that happen during the most rare of rain storms? Or do the residents expect protection from the inconvenience of the typical summer thunderstorm? Or is the expectation somewhere in between. Do the residents expect all stormwater to be drained into defined washes and drainageways? Or can the residents tolerate some drainage being run within streets and parking areas? Is an increase in the amount and frequency of runoff acceptable? Or do the residents want regulations to limit the discharge of runoff from new development? A good stormwater management program identifies the level of service to be provided through control of stormwater runoff, its quantity and quality. The Town Wide Drainage Study Currently,the Town is attempting to answer many of the questions posed above through a comprehensive study of the Town's drainage basins, existing drainage improvements, and assessment of future needs. The Town has retained the services of a professional consulting firm to perform the study.' ' The Town Council approved a contract with Kimley-Horn Associates in March 2000. The work is expected to take a year to complete. Town of Oro Valley Preliminary Stormwater Utility Feasibility Assessment I Page 3 NPDES Phase II Regulations The National Pollution Discharge Elimination System, or NPDES, program was first developed in 1972 as the fundamental regulatory mechanism of the Clean Water Act (CWA). The NPDES program is administered by the Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) and requires anyone discharging from a point source (e.g., a single commercial or industrial operation) into "waters of the United States" to obtain an NPDES permit. It is important to understand this latter term as it is often cold with the more intuitive understanding of flowing rivers and streams. The Clean Water Act defines"waters of the United States"as surface waters, including streams, streambeds, rivers, lakes, reservoirs, arroyos, washes, and other ephemeral watercourses and wetlands. The federal government has generally interpreted this definition to include almost any ground feature that might occasionally convey runoff in response to rainfall. The initial focus of the NPDES program was on industrial and municipal wastewater. However, the federal government believes that several studies have shown that pollution from diffuse sources is now the leading cause of water quality impairment. Diffuse sources are those that cannot be isolated at a particular location like a gas station or manufacturing plant. Such "diffuse" sources include urban areas (such as housing and commercial developments), agricultural areas, construction sites and mining operations among others. As a result, the 1987 amendments to the CWA added Section 402(p), which required the EPA to develop a comprehensive phased program to regulate stormwater discharges under the NPDES program. The program was to include provision for regulating flows from municipal storm sewer systems such as those found in most cities and towns throughout the country used to drain streets and neighborhoods. Such"municipal separate storm sewer systems" are referred to as MS4s by the EPA. The initial phase of the program developed by EPA in response to CWA Section 402(p) was aimed at larger municipalities serving populations of 100,000 or more and was implemented in 1990. However, as of December 1999, the second phase (Phase II) became effective. The Phase II regulations cover municipalities serving populations of less than 100,000, which are located within"urban" areas. The EPA defines urban areas as defined areas with populations of 50,000 or more. Thus the Phase II regulations cover the Town of Oro Valley by virtue of its location within the Eastern Pima County urban area. The Town's storm sewer system is referred to as a"small MS4" by the EPA. Requirements The NPDES Phase II regulations call for small MS4s to implement a program that will provide the following "minimum control measures" (EPA's term): 1. Public Education and Outreach on Stormwater Impacts 2. Public Involvement and Participation 3. Monitoring and Prevention of Illicit Discharges to the Stormwater System 4. Control of Construction Site Stormwater Runoff Town of Oro Valley Preliminary Stormwater Utility Feasibility Assessment I Page 4 5. Management of Post-Construction Stormwater Management in New Development and Redevelopment 6. Implementation of Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping Practices for Municipal Operations Additional information regarding program requirements under each of the above categories is provided in Appendix A of this document. In addition to developing a program that includes the above components, the community must develop a series of measurable goals for each of the above controls. Examples of such measurable goals include: • Inspecting or repairing a certain number of drain inlets each year; • Conducting street-sweeping operations a certain number of times each year; • Surveying all municipal rights-of-ways to identify illicit discharges; • Conducting a certain number of training classes for municipal operations each year; • Soliciting the help of a certain number of volunteers each year to perform water quality monitoring or education/outreach activities; or • Reducing sediment loading. Permitting Deadline and Approval The deadline for small MS4s, including the Town of Oro Valley, to make application to the EPA for their NPDES Phase II permits is December 2003. By that time, the Town must have submitted a Notice of Intent (NOI) to be covered under the NPDES Phase II program. The NOI must include a description of: • The Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be implemented. BMPs are schedules of activities, prohibitions of practices, maintenance procedures and other management techniques used to implement the "minimum control measures" described above; • The measurable goals used to determine achievement of the minimum control measures; • The month and year in which each BMP will be started and completed, or the frequency of action if it is ongoing; and • The person(s) responsible for implementing or coordinating the stormwater management program. The Town will be covered under a general NPDES permit within 48 hours of submittal of the NOI and will be notified by mail of its permit number. If, for some reason, the NOI is not adequate, the Town will hear from the EPA. Penalties NPDES Permits are federally enforceable. Violators may be subject to the enforcement actions and penalties described in Clean Water Act sections 309(b), (c), and (g) and 505. The cited references call for fines of up to $25,000 per day for knowing violations of the regulations, with higher fines for repeat violations. Town of Oro Valley Preliminary Stormwater Utility Feasibility Assessment I Page 5 Regional NPDES Programs The urbanized area of Pima County directly surrounding the City of Tucson, as well as the City itself, are both required to apply for NPDES municipal stormwater discharge permits. In order to assure that the quality of stormwater discharges from its municipal storm sewer system is managed to the maximum extent practicable, Pima County has developed a Stormwater Management Program that includes best management practices, public education and stormwater monitoring. The major components of Pima County's Stormwater Management Program include: Monitoring for Illicit Connections and Illegal Dumping: Pima County's storm drain system includes roadways, pipes and constructed channels. Pima County monitors discharges from its storm drain system both during dry weather and during storms. It is illegal to dump waste into the storm drain system. If an inappropriate or illegal discharge is detected, the flow is traced back to its source so that the discharge can be eliminated in the future. Stormwater Discharges Associated with Industrial Activity: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency requires a select group of industrial facilities to secure NPDES stormwater discharge permits. Pima County is developing an industrial facility database and inspection program to assist the industrial community in achieving compliance with federal requirements. Stormwater Discharges Associated with Construction Sites: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency requires all construction sites over five acres in size to secure a stormwater discharge permit. Pima County is developing an inspection program to assist construction site operators in achieving compliance with federal regulations. Stormwater Assistance Program: Pima County is developing a Stormwater Assistance Program as an extension of its existing Business Assistance Program. The Stormwater Assistance Program will assist businesses and persons in their efforts to comply with NPDES stormwater regulations and will educate citizens about stormwater runoff and associated concerns. Benefits to Public The benefits of the NPDES program include: • Better public understanding of the stormwater system in their area and the hazards of discharging polluted waters into it; • Cleaner water in the Town's streets, drainageways and streams; • Less silt and sediment deposited in roadways and drainageways; • Development of a database on infrastructure improvement and maintenance needs; and • Better performance of well maintained infrastructure; and • Compliance with the NPDES Phase II regulations and avoidance of penalties. 2 From Pima County Department of Environmental Quality(PCDEQ)web site: http://www.deq.co.pima.az.us/h2oinfoistormh2oistorm.htm s i Town of Oro Valley Preliminary Stormwater Utility Feasibility Assessment I Page 6 Costs The costs of a stormwater management program to meet NPDES requirements are not easily determined. However, a good deal of research has been done on the cost incurred by communities that have already implemented NPDES stormwater programs. The following paragraphs discuss some of the different cost components of the program. Manpower: Staff is needed to provide public outreach, inspection, maintenance, regulatory and administrative functions. Capital and Equipment: On occasion NPDES compliance requires construction of improvements to control the quantity and quality of runoff. Such improvements can include grass lining of channels, detention ponds, stormwater filtration basins and systems. Equipment needs can include street sweepers, water quality monitoring equipment and stations. Maintenance &Inspection: An important part of a stormwater program is the need to inspect and maintain the infrastructure of channels, roadways, storm drains, basins, etc. These facilities need to be inspected and maintained on a regular basis. Inspections are also needed of private construction projects to insure that NPDES requirements are being met. Administration: A stormwater program requires administration just like any other regulatory program. Permitting, inspection, maintenance and construction all need planning, coordination and financing administration. Public Awareness: Public awareness costs can include public meeting set ups, flyers, staff time for meetings and production of educational materials such as videos, poster boards, etc. The resulting costs of all these components can add up. In addition, private sector costs are incurred to meet regulatory requirements. A July 1999 survey of communities already administering stormwater programs indicated annual per capita costs for stormwater management ranging from a low of $0.03 to a high of $26.00, with an average annual per capita cost of$2.76 for those communities responding to the survey3. Utilitizing information from the above survey,the EPA estimated a total annual per household cost of$9.16 for those communities automatically designated to meet the requirements of the NPDES Phase H regulations. Funding There are a number of different ways in which a stormwater management program can be funded. The matrix on the following pages provides a summary of the various funding options and their advantages and disadvantages by different evaluation criteria with comments on each option relative to their applicability to Arizona and the Town. 3 Survey of Stormwater Phase H Communities,National Flood and Stormwater Management Agencies(NAFSMA), July 1999 S .... -I go .1:: -1-1 .1.1 c rE.-_-, q g r- r- C C4 an C/) oil "11 4 a' 5 5 g S g ..":r1 C) <. q CA g a z e� g v) vCO � o ~_ O Tc. o �• � o b �' ,� • � �. bgra §• �b = �• � � moo . �D AO co C• i/� r. a Ao r-. 2 ri ,, < -0 .._.,fl 0 ."� �..- ,...."0 --..G 7 A r C� CD ni O AN 00 �' i D G A O C cT' cp O '-� �' p a� p "0 z-** II g.47' g 005 r° (D" i e Ss: CLcr (41 R ,,,, — En C:L g cs C't) pa ,- :op = 5 . ,_. 0 5:2 _...__. = 0 e 1 � '"'a < (D r� !n .. . CD CD :"..T. Nca.. E.Cl) ► b _ O yaz opo 2§ a54 F 2ya CA � tri - � ft? C(o CD `G D FP - Gn .! 7: �z R o < A)oCrn CC. CD O la z`i CD r v, 0 tC ....„fid ` ` UG O `b `L3 �, m co Z 14 .-.. Q. ._. rt Q.• m c ... ~o = Qom.0 ::. 0 14. ° CD 53 Cs) 2 =I a). q r:1Q co O. z u,i n n cn O o 6►-t p .r. e� < 4..0 o C1. - CD CD acoZ CCD ..'9 O CD (/) Z z q ° 4 ood -sqn r) r) - b tm Xis Ca. z. r•. to e-. I ; = CD a > w) � ctil 4 g � o d d � o m to ro a T4 ''' ' w Ca, ....• § at.' ......„ _ 0 °• b cr r ,0 ►_,, C) 2 .8 > -c28n & n � � ,, n 0 -, n nod g'... C124.1 ir in; 113 .—.. a E.,.,..,, ,,,.. ..._. -. ,g, ... . ..... 0 sr a..g, -, 8 -cl 0 n I= q 0 �' 00 CD 0 dq `� A) ,,, ` A 8 ° a. Pp .- ° a �� a Sr a 4 Cl) A ° d .,,:s ac � � Q ' � o � �' '- > c 'fito �.0 ►� �. o c , � 5 , � � d' -, o ... qg , Qs- , .... o. 2 a: •Q' to � te �° = 9A • C a ~ • a c�i @ . ye,; *, i s''' (IQ 7.17 0 CPC) ro 2 fp = D, 4.. -1 a (,,, - -g: a cpo ,,, a c t a. t:0 .4. 7C1 ft CL hti oO a (o $ aCD CD a N .. ,:,. a 4 , i o- .. ,... 0 5. n El. sz tri 4 Z ° ,r2 4. F., a Z O .� "'O ." '-t c X.A 5 ra. .... = O O e '"t to 0 .4 .t T3 O `� d � �- R 6 2 Q. '56) C � ; R N �• < e� A pc- O as,.. 2 cm w 0 r., q fit 0 fti a `I CTi ►-3 C~ 0 -1 d (.4 -d d n O t-il cA ....1 co ii fi n ° o A n0 , • O gc � a- o �`? aro b P CD Qv u, CD = - r• o = 1 1 Fr O G. pct t� 'Z3 ''d POCLCDD �.7 �-�'• O • =- to O . .0 ).:$ (T a 2-2 6 g 65 ....,- Q. . 0 .,,, — ,- ..... z . 6" Er 5', '6 - c4,-, 0 o gi 5...q Ft, 2 ,- . — U) 11'' 'CA = Cr B " g a C) =-. (A gc< V...6 9 z ny, .00 ...._. 9 g n -. CD o O O• _> CD r•.. CD to CD O 0 CD 14) A. 00 0 O 0 i - v) --I n- ,..-. *q g § 3" ‘E 2 V: P U:. ,c1B. 2, ,g:.: .,.,, g. ,-, t ti 1 (1) 2 2 a w B Fi: --. ca. CA g 2 sla rs F. ' 5 g2 .8 -. 2 =it- 0 8 . 2, ca. i , Op�• • . O �' �' D ..1 Aa (IQ Co ,..,.. ._ 5,2 8 i . 14: n O `- O VA n ac, cc c„ , , z z O T z oo ' '-'11'-4' cD �' m 0 o a, 0 Q. R , A 'A: n CD �. . o CO y •-► �r J. r-. 3 ' 2g• CD CD 2 � A � D O .... a O O Ah O Etv, 5 1-Laj a cn p ca. 0.aA , = 1 CD cD b oCl. 0 =I'i)o ba7• g d °' 8 � 8o' n � 2 ,� > a-4p142an noz a r.„0 5 Q. 0, , 1 — a — --, q a a...... g. go 8 ,<.. i....,<,,. ig s. a a. ,....,,i Es, .3 0 62..0. IS ell .''. 5 R 4. a — „, .0 , . IZ 2 q 5 eg, a.an -t-.1 Cl. = Et g Sr el is p a. 8 F., 7,- g 2 - '5',' a -I c" ::*.* O ''� 'O*s O to Q° y cD = o 0 g' Q, g_. 01 •ov3d ii ! a' 226Z � ,wd gcd -. g- rut a 2 wr... .g... -a- g 0 a zi .g. iel ca. m S. § ggg ,- 8=1gB, a, „O g C ,� cr r„ n '..' a �QM e7 � O B. tZ. Cp - p . q ,••. 0• a. 0. '"� a' to O O ,t O 4. , , , tr. a. = a O Q 1 g < n itnC, fD () � Z f) to d Q , >. '.�~' O R 8c. a. R •.6O 8a. R , ob 0 vi Ot� t, - � O' r. 0 "p`'. Crn '; C7 O vo .... � rri O ,�. .. a O a. gw = v, = acA = u, z n g (Acc4Om mrtQcD'., =. , O• O p• O = O• O 203 � `dy>,%) 000 0Uad '3 ` ap0Z. O R ,� 0) CD:1 cr no,„ „, et oa Town of Oro Valley Preliminary Stormwater Utility Feasibility Assessment Page 9 Based on preliminary assessment of the possible alternatives, this feasibility assessment was focused on the development of a stormwater utility. This option was selected because of the inherent equity of the distribution of costs to all residents of the community. The stormwater utility concept is discussed further in the following section. Town of Oro Valley Preliminary Stormwater Utility Feasibility Assessment I Page 10 Stormwater Utility Many communities develop stormwater utilities to create a dedicated and reliable funding mechanism for their stormwater management program. State enabling legislation is often required, and local implementation ordinances will be needed as well. The basic philosophy behind the utility fee is that "users" should pay for the stormwater program to the extent that they contribute to the problem. The term"users," in this case, includes property owners, particularly, property owners that have impervious surfaces on their property. This approach is equitable because it charges a fee for the service of stormwater management (rather than a tax) and because all property contributes to runoff. Legal Basis One of the first issues to address in the feasibility of the Stormwater Utility concept is whether or not a sufficient legal basis exists for its implementation. Currently, Arizona Revised Statutes(ARS) Title 9, Chapter 5, Part 9-521, "Definitions", defines"utility undertaking"to include stormwater. This chapter addresses the use of municipal bonds for financing utilities and, under Part 9-530, "Service charges; taxation and budgeting; computation," states that"the governing body of the municipality issuing the bonds shall prescribe service charges, and shall revise them when necessary, so that a utility undertaking for which the bonds were issued shall always remain self supporting..." This section also states that the service charges shall generate sufficient revenue to pay all bonds and associated expenses when due, provide for all expenses of operation, maintenance, expansion, and replacement of facilities and to provide reasonable reserves for such purposes. The legal requirements for implementation of a stormwater utility will require further research before serious development of the concept can begin. Structure The stormwater utility can be structured to assess costs by different land use designations and their relative contribution to the amount and quality of runoff and the associated need for stormwater management. Most stormwater utilities charge either a monthly or annual fee based upon the amount of impervious area on the property. Commonly, a necessary annual revenue base for operation of the utility is determined5. That revenue base is then divided by a number representing a rough estimate of the amount of impervious surface being served by the estimated annual revenue base6. A base rate can then be developed based on the $/impervious unit. This base rate can then be converted into monthly or annual service fees for different land use categories(residential, commercial, industrial, etc.) 5 This would include amortization of up front capital costs as well as annual operation and maintenance costs. Such an estimate could be incorporated into the ongoing Town Wide Drainage Study. 6 Such an estimate can be done by assuming certain percentages of impervious cover for different land use categories. Town of Oro Valley Preliminary Stormwater Utility Feasibility Assessment Page 11 based on the number of impervious units for each land use category. The example below illustrates the concept. Hypothetical Example: It may be determined that a total annual revenue base of $100,000 is needed to operate the stormwater utility. It may also be determined that the current impervious coverage in the service area is 100,000,000 square feet. Thus the annual base rate to operate the stormwater utility is $100,000 divided by 100,000,000 square feet or $0.001 per square foot impervious cover. It is then determined, as part of this example, that a typical medium density residential area is 40% impervious, while commercial developments are 80% impervious and industrial developments are 90% impervious. As a result the following service fee rates could be developed: Med. Residential = $0.001 x 0.40 x lot area(sq. ft.) (e.g., $8.71/year for a half acre lot) Commercial = $0.001 x 0.80 x lot area(sq. ft.) (e.g., $34.85/year for a one acre lot) Industrial = $0.001 x 0.90 x lot area(sq. ft.) (e.g., $39.20/year for a one acre lot) The concept can then be extended to other land use categories based either on general categories of impervious cover or by actual measurement of impervious cover. Keep in mind that the above illustration is only one of many ways in which a fee structure could be determined. However, generally speaking the rate should be based on the degree to which property contributes to runoff and, by extension, the cost of providing stormwater management services. Also, some stormwater utilities only charge if there is impervious surface on the property. Others charge all landowners, however if there is no development on the property the rate is typically lower than that charged for developed property. Some communities are evaluating adding a water quality component to their utility fee rate formula.. This quality factor would allow communities to have user pay for not only the quantity of stormwater that they contribute, but also the quality. Because a utility charges a user fee, not a tax, schools and churches typically are not exempted from paying the fee. Some stormwater utilities receive additional funding from developers' fees and permit application fees. The manner in which the service fee is assessed is also important. The service fee can be incorporated into an existing billing structure, such as the Town's water billing. Or the service fee could be billed separately. The cost of implementing the billing structure should be considered in the overall cost of the stormwater program. Town of Oro Valley Preliminary Stormwater Utility Feasibility Assessment Page 12 Conclusion The Town of Oro Valley faces many challenges in maintaining and improving its existing stormwater infrastructure. In addition, the Town will need to address the legal, institutional, regulatory and capital requirements associated with the NPDES Phase H regulations in the years to come. This document summarizes the issues associated with developing a stormwater program. This document also briefly summarizes funding options for developing and maintaining a stormwater program. Finally, this document describes the stormwater utility approach to stormwater management in more detail. More research is needed on the legal, aspects, costs and revenue potential of developing a stormwater utility, however, the stormwater utility concept appears to offer the most equitable manner in which to apportion the costs of developing, operating and maintaining a stormwater management program which is needed by the Town and for which no dedicated funding source currently exists. References Survey of Local Stormwater Utilities, National Association of Flood and Stormwater Management Agencies(NAFSMA), 1996 Survey of Stormwater Phase II Communities, National Association of Flood and Stormwater Management Agencies (NAFSMA), July 1999 Designing and Implementing an Effective Storm Water Management Program—Storm Water NPDES Phase II Regulations, American Public Works Association(APWA), February 2000 National Pollution Discharge Elimination System—Regulations for Revision of the Water Pollution Control Program Addressing Storm Water Discharges; Final Rule, Report to Congress on the Phase II Storm Water Regulations; Notice, 40 CFR Parts 9, 122, 123 and 124 Attachments Excerpts from Designing and Implementing an Effective Storm Water Management Program— Storm Water NPDES Phase II Regulations, American Public Works Association(APWA), February 2000 Chapter What We Required To Do About Storm Water? . . ..„'.,..,._ . ff. . + K.t., ....,. ,., . .. j .> .:., . .„.,... _, s _-_ . , . .„ ,. ., .. .., .:„ ,_,,,;,.. . , ............„. .., ,,,... 2_,_,,_. ..,.,,,,,,,,„...„ .... , , ::„: .,. ip.,..„*...,., ..... . ,... ...-. ,- .. . . .. . .. , : , ... ... . ..„,......„......:::..,..,.. .„..... :, . .. . .,.,...„. , ,, ,.,. ,.. .. „..„,..:.....: . ..,.....t.„. -. . ....-,....,„..4., - --.,...• ...„- - ‘....._ ,...:,....,-....;-_,/. . ..„: ; c(&L♦ •f., :, _ ,r., .--.F.,....„....„4.-.,-.. .....A.-..,;:.....—..o. . .., ,„%,- w _ ~4 p -..1/4 Yom '^�': ..;�. , , . 6.,.....,:,--",.' • w . _ Yom: off x. ..,::,,,I,..;: r .rf 3 t f. .T' JO.i 3I'',. .4. :1 i,:: ,,-. ,..,. ...,.,.,.....,..:: „, ,,;..:... . 4§." ,......„:::,040,. -4,4, . -.'.--4 i / rJ• rod: " -. .. ' 4.,•-i.,...--f.., ' 11 .'"1/4 ).: .--?-isp ...t.,,, r., ...:-.-....,.44::.:.ry4' - ���Ai i`s t,�, - ,, .% . - :A. . ...•• •• , . , ,- •,I. ,.. - . -4• :---•:----,:•: . —:•-•. —..- ••..°•‘">it', '''-.,''''.-&4,6.04,‘„,3 Developing an effective storm water management program makes sense. In addition to the practical benefits derived from storm water management programs,federal regulations govern how you manage storm water in your community This chapter addresses: • An overview of federal policy and regulations for storm water management; •The objectives of Phase II regulations; •A discussion of EPA's role in administering the Phase II Rule, as well as the roles of state,local,and tribal governments and permitting authorities; •A description of NPDES storm water Phase II requirements; • A discussion of who is covered by the Phase II --- regulations;and /r _ - ` 7 _ - • A description of what's involved in the Phase II permitting process. r C---_� 1 • Federal Storni Water Management Policy The federal government has finalized regulations for storm water management in smaller communities- known as the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES) Phase II Rule. This rule is designed to comply with the requirements of the Clean Water Act and to further protect our nation's streams,rivers and beaches from polluted storm water runoff. Phase II regulations follow the 1990 NPDES Phase I Rule, which addressed priority sources of pollutant runoff,including storm water pollution from medium and large municipal separate storm sewer systems, industrial sources,and construction sites disturbing at least five acres. Phase II requirements grew out of a long-standing concern on the part of federal legislators for protecting surface water. To better understand these regulations,you must look at the evolution of the NPDES program. The (lean Water Act The Clean Water Act(CWA)is the primary federal legislation that protects surface waters,such as lakes,rivers, and coastal areas. The CWA stems from the federal Water Pollution Control Act(WPCA), which was originally enacted in 1948. This legislation employed ambient water quality standards in specifying the acceptable levels of pollution in a state's waters. This approach - stressing tolerable pollution rather than preventable causes of water pollution-proved to be an ineffective means of preventing pollution. Other problems with the WPCA included awkwardly shared federal and state responsibility for promulgating the standards and cumbersome enforcement procedures. The CWA was developed in 1972 to strengthen and expand the WPCA. The CWA took a different approach to addressing water pollution. The amendments focused on establishing effluent limitations on point sources, or"any discernible,confined and discrete conveyance... from which pollutants are or may be discharged" (PL. 92-500). Increased accountability for protecting water quality was placed on dischargers of pollutants.The amendments also required states and tribes to survey their waters and determine an appropriate use for each, then set specific water quality criteria for various pollutants to protect those uses. Another addition to the 1972 CWA was the provision of certain funding mechanisms to help communities meet their clean water goals. The 1972 CWA also introduced the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES). NPDES (Section 402) The NPDES program was established as the fundamental C :j1/1 .)1) regulatory mechanism of the CWA. The NPDESro am requires p � q anyone discharging a pollutant from a point source into the waters o!_ 2 Federal Storm Water.Management Policy Timeline 1940 1950 - 1948- Federal Water Pollution -••• Control Act originally Enacted 1 Y6Q 1970 1972-Significant changes made to FWPCA • henceforth known as the Clean Water Act 1977- Minor amendments made to the CWA 1980 1981 - Minor amendments made to the CWA 1987-NPDES and nonpoint source programs established 1990-Phase I implementation December 15, 1997-Proposed Phase II rule signed 1990 by EPA Administrator October 29,1999- Final Phase II rule signed by EPA December 8,1999-Final Phase II rule published in Federal Register December 2000-NPDES-authorized states must modify their NPDES program if no statutory change is required December 2001 - NPDES-authorized states must modify their NPDES program if no statutory change is required 2000 • December 2002- Permitting authority designates small MS4s March 2003-Municipal industrial NPDES application due f . (ISTES sources) March 2003- regulated small MS4s and storm water discharges associated with other activity submit permit application dor 3,ns and 90 clays after Anal rrqulaio,r issued) December 2004- Permitting authority with storm water watershed plans designates small MS4s 201() 2008- Regulated small MS4s programs developed and implemented (or five after p issuance) December 2012- Reevaluation of the Phase II rule by EPA • r = Every 5 Years- Submission 202 of No Exposure Certification 61"". 3 - � of the United States to obtain an NPDES permit. The initial focus was on industrial and municipal wastewater. Controlling these targeted point sources has substantially improved water quality. However,several studies have shown that pollution from diffuse (nonpoint)sources-such as storm water runoff from urban and agricultural areas, construction sites,land disposal,and resource extraction(mining)- are now the leading cause of water quality impairment. Although storm water runoff originates from diffuse sources,it is often discharged through separate storm sewers or other conveyances,which are regulated under the CWA. The 1987 amendments to the CWA,therefore,added Section 402(p), which required the EPA to develop a comprehensive phased program to regulate storm water discharges under the NPDES program.This task promised to be challenging because storm water originates from so many separate,undiscernable sources,and there were not yet proven control techniques to mitigate storm water pollution. The Phase I rule was issued in November 1990. The rule addressed storm water discharges from medium and large municipal separate storm sewer systems(MS4s)(those serving communities with a population of at least 100,000), as well as storm water discharges associated with industrial activity. The Phase II proposed rule was signed by the EPA Administrator on December 15, 1997. Final Phase II regulations,which effect smaller communities,were signed October 29, 1999. NPDES permitting authorities must modify their existing NPDES permits by December 2000,if statutory changes are not required, or by December 2001 if statutory changes are required. Regulated small MS4s and storm water discharges associated with other activities need to submit their permit applications by March 2003 (or 3 years and 90 days after final regulations are issued). Regulated small MS4 programs •-could be developed and implemented by 2008,or five years after permit issuance. Appendix G includes a copy of the Phase II Rule. Appendix H presents a brief s of other federal regulations that affect storm water management. What are the Objectives of Phase 1 Regulations? The United States Environmental Protection Agency's(EPA's) objectives in developing the Phase II regulations include: • Provide a comprehensive storm water program that designates and controls additional sources of storm water \ discharges to protect water quality, pursuant to CWA Section �'� �l 402 (p)(6). 4 Major Differences Between Phase I and Phase II Phase I Phase II Who Is Covered • Large MS4s(serving a • Small MS4s(serving a population of 250,000 or population of less than more) 100,000 and located in - Medium MS4s(serving a an urbanized area or population of 100,000 to designated by the 250,000) permitting authority) • Construction activities • Construction activities disturbing five or more disturbing between one acres and five acres • Industries(specified by SIC • Industrial sources code) designated by the permitting authority • ISTEA sources (including municipally owned/operated industrial facilities) Monitoring • Mandatory ongoing • NPDES permitting monitoring required of authorities establish medium and large MS4s small MS4 monitoring requirements Application • Very specific,detailed • Streamlined application Requirements application requirements. requirements • Application requirements • General permits don't lend themselves to encouraged;application general permits requirements lend themselves to this approach Program • Specific activities required • More broad— Requirements • Municipalities must address municipalities can commercial and industrial develop own BMPs to dischargers in the address minimum community control measures • Municipalities do not necessarily have to address industrial _ dischargers 7 - (col Alp Wri.:-77`,--)•,,, 1111141ft lik.olW- 5 •Address discharges of storm water activities not addressed by Phase I,including: • Construction activities disturbing less than five acres; • "Light"industrial activities not exposed to storm water; • "MS4s located in urbanized areas not covered under Phase I; and •Municipally owned industrial facilities that were addressed under Phase I but granted an extension under ISTEA(Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act). •Facilitate and promote watershed planning as a framework for implementing water quality programs wherever possible. EPA aims to achieve these objectives by balancing nationwide automatic designation and locally based designation. EPA will designate on a nationwide basis: • Storm water discharges from small MS4s located in urbanized areas;and •Construction activities that result in land disturbance equal to or greater than one acre. EPA believes that this designation criteria addresses the main sources of storm water pollution causing significant degradation of surface waters. Permitting authorities may designate additional small MS4s,categories,or individual sources of storm water discharges that are problematic in specific communities. What is EPA's Role in implementing Phase 11?. EPA's role in Phase II implementation includes provision of a flexible regulatory framework;development of tools to help the regulated community;provision of permits; and oversight of state programs. Provide Flexible Regulatory Framework EPA's approach is to provide a regulatory framework that ensures that permits issued to municipalities include the minimum control measures,while providing the NPDES permitting authorities with a significant amount of flexibility so that they can be sensitive to regional issues. Some of the ways in which Phase II allows for flexibility include: • Permitting authorities establish designation criteria for small �~ 11 MS4s located outside of urbanized areas. C`- • Permitting authorities can designate other MS4s or construction,industrial,or commercial facilities that are not covered nationally, on a case-by-case or regional basis. • Permitting authorities may provide waivers to MS4s and construction activities in certain situations,such as where: •Construction activities of between one and five acres: (1)The value of the rainfasll erosivity factor is less than five(5); (2)TMDL assessment or equivelant assessment addresses the pollutants of concern. • Regulated small MS4s serving jurisdictions with a population of less than 1,000: (1) Its discharges are not contributing substantially to pollutant loadings; and (2) If there is a discharge of any pollutant(s)a TMDL is already established to address the pollutant(s)of concern. • Regulated small MS4s with a population under 10,000 if: (1)All water receiving discharges from the system have been evaluated;and (2)A TMDL or equivalent analysis has been conducted and allocated for pollutants;and (3) It has been determined that current and future discharges do not have the potential to result in exceedences of water quality standards. •General permits are encouraged and may be issued on a watershed basis. •Qualifying local programs can be incorporated in NPDES permit requirements. •Minimum control measures may be implemented by another governmental entity,such as a larger,neighboring community. • A cooperative and/or a watershed-based approach is encouraged. •TMDLs for single pollutant(s)os concern. EPA expects encouraging the use of general permits for the majority of sources to be designated under Phase II to lessen the regulatory burden placed on the permitting authority. EPA is also / working to streamline the application/Notice of Intent(NOI) (r" process to reduce the burden on the regulated community. Immmirw- t. Roles of the Federal Government, States, Permitting Authorities, and Municipalities/Tribes in Implementing Please U NPDES Regulations Federal All States NPDES Permitting Municipalities/ Government Authorities Tribes Develop overall Comply with Comply with other All regulated MS4s must framework of program: requirements as a regulatory requirements establish a storm water discharger: management program • Rule Designate sources: that meets the • State-operated • Toolbox MS4s • Develop criteria requirements of six minimum control • Permit • Apply criteria • State construction measures: Encourage use of sites • Designate • public education watershed approach interconnected Communicate with EPA sources • Public involvement/ Provide financial amici participation assistance: • Address public P p petition • Illicit discharge • No appropriated detection and funds Provide waivers elimination • Federal grant Issue permits • Construction site programs Issue menu of controls Implement programfor appropriate BMPs in • post-construction non-NPDES authorized cases of general permits controls states,tribes,and Support local programs: • Pollution • Provide financial prevention/good Oversee state programs support(to extent housekeeping for Comply with possible) municipal operations requirements as a • Oversee programs Comply with discharger: P P Y requirements as a •• Federally-owned Ensure , , discharger,including MS4s(i.e., municipalities have municipally hospitals/prisons) adequate legal owned/operated authority industrial sources • Federal construction projects - a...) slip C---- .:V_ na� 8 Develop Tool Box EPA has made a commitment to work with the Storm Water Phase II Urban Wet Weather Flows Advisory Committee to develop a "tool box" to assist states,tribes,municipalities and other parties involved in the Phase II program.This tool box will facilitate efficient and cost-effective implementation of the regulation. EPA developed a preliminary working tool box in 1999. The tool box should be finalized by the time the general per- ::t is issued and will be updated as new information becomes available. The tool box will include: • Fact sheets; • Guidance documents; • Information clearinghouse; •Training and outreach efforts; •Technical research; • Support for demonstration projects;and • Regional workshops. EPA worked with the Urban Water Resources Research Council of the American Society of Civil Engineers to develop a database on BMP effectiveness,which is available on CD-ROM and through the Internet. For more information on this database,refer to Appendix I. Provide Permits The EPA is the permitting authority for non-authorized states, tribes and territories. EPA,therefore,has the same responsibility as any other NPDES permitting authority-issuing permits, designating additional sources,and taking appropriate enforcement actions. EPA will tailor the program to the needs of the state, tribe,or territory. Oversee State Programs EPA also must oversee the programs for NPDES-approved states and tribes. EPA and the states and tribes will work together to implement, enforce, and improve the program. EPA also will work with states and tribes to help them modify their existing programs where inadequacies exist. In addition, EPA reviews the continuing planning process(CPP) periodically,to assess the accomplishments of the program. If EPA's evaluation of a state's program deems that the program is inadequate,EPA will work extensively with the state to help improve the program. If the state program is not brought into compliance,the NPDES authorization can be revoked. 9 What Does the Federal Government Require for Storm Water Management under Phase II? For MS4s: The EPA requires, under the Phase II regulation, that all owners/operators of small MS4s reduce the discharge of pollutants from a regulated system to the "maximum extent practicable"to protect water quality. At a minimum,jurisdictions regulated under Phase II must: •Specify BMPs for six minimum control measures and implement them to the"maximum extent practicable;" • Identify measurable goals for control measures; • Show an implementation schedule of activities or frequency of activities;and • Define the entity responsible for implementation. For Construction and Other Activities: Construction activities that disturb one to five acres must also be regulated under an NPDES Phase II permit. The NPDES permitting authority may also require that other facilities and industrial and construction activities,as well as small MS4s outside urbanized areas,be designated on a case-by-case or categorical basis. Each of these requirements is discussed in more detail in the subsections that follow. .};Iirdl..1,1,,,,',"...4FgrAr$;zp4,-,:m.:,,,,-•rt.y �} � •S::!:1•tvrniK.f .i i{,�%fR[ !:.,4ir:��?•r••.'�{•i�?t;f{r?'�ti:Y�y�{ .y.i !:"l};.v:•r r.y <I •:� r . f :v:.<•'.:•r:.•.{.-: C�F.::y .i,,�}' r. {•.�,.. � ••• •i8:• •f^ p`C r � ..•i•.}��•�. ▪ •'•.Y .� rfi•({{C'.:/w'••r•'�'vJ:•~.t `^ - • :,.JV- :}f.. ..L r%,.•l�- �[ ••• ',";;,,..4:"._..:* .: ,:r -S:• ft-)..,• /y.l.A•: ••r•• r I 4. 'f-••.\•!. `:?. J y'J; { y r ! ry r' y: • •},<v.. {.:,1 ti?S ri i.•"+C• Y 1:r' ;i' . VVV �• !, :}i, te,\�•r...a�• •r' •Y : .v :'rr.J. •�.1,r � "��"y�`ry� T r /vf r. •x•:•}'.. �":: ., •?,'(Y .••• /:::4:::w;?JJ r: �!'•: • •�' it :;f> .;•ti r) '.4:,$:.•:',„,,44.:, k. {r.3'• ri\ t,i••,7,,,,,:: ..: r {:,..0..+:.):;•::.:/: • 1'•%,!;., :C{�:,:::•.:ti :'•'•%; �rirl:�: •;'• f k.Z• ty 4t•,..'4,`,..itRtt4▪..,:...,,,,,:._ ' s!{,r irs:•-;i,7r`\wr• •,' • fr?•'yr•:P!.? •'e•. .•a'r 'rrvJy.•} .:!:r!•:j,..f�:�:�y4•.}•li%n<rL r_•C• •.i S r' .i C << .i1 r''''',..^^-,"1% f.�„-�`��; •' 1 •: yr,;)°.; . }•���• ;�•.r- jr:i.1,} !:,!' r11. .. r 2 1'!f�r i t'} rti. {•e f }--' : .�'; {! !S: ::•144., 4 ..e 7 C• ,'1•r ..-,Cr�r:S f J{ iv ••: i•+ n•'yy•y .r- r.':.t{xn�S 7r* ?•J r 57•f i.'±w•i-r,C,r/Yry'�>►" .5,,. ..W n:•..7 i ,n_ / y/. •> +`;:, r ; .•v t• 'iL ' {}:; ',ti.Y 51 '.vV�/ ' • ; •ti�~ Y C f:�'•.:t. r'Gx,...::� .,y1':1: .,,. ..' -r ��:-...„::.,.:k.',:,. r', a},/• >.v✓.r ..., a Xr� v SL` � f ?. C �> >f>y r i .•;�{? R a.�♦yr.V{rflS+ t :i,Si'�~i.��.�:•r: • i v,... 0:' ;: -,,{''r'4': t Y ''.,y,�v i** iY*Al i 7' •i?�•fi: :`�y\ -e, .S�Tt•► i C•. ,:r •-f', x r ,. ti �7::1 �. y.. •!I}7 Y a 3�C .i 4 3i1.\ti `r .♦ •i :`E S`f`r ♦.�: t }•fr►:JV4,St�r1 \(i..:• : f \-.. J •'Q�pril... .? .i• a w.b,.: ? •y�•] v.`yt Jy'•y�•S f QS,Q!�. '}i: •♦ .:. Yr. rC,..-,::,-;-:f-,..34 .%i `VYtiG{''u�`C -•YS't.}�,•':-..:J.':..:,-:.''-...:..?"-,-, '?:�tx.S ti :�': !:'{J: !: -•:}•r?:i•-�-'i`P'# a }�,�r..<•'r �¢rC:S•f•rr �•�: :'r{:,\\fes.:, r, !M1. -..e.... r•t�'r .•}'' �.. � ++{{���,.`� J:.J r Y .cid:y i�•'�'�� '. ..4� L\•.titt�`..r:.s♦�r_5.,4., •,<�.,`..�ti.�}y•�f•.. r♦ ,• .i."..-%::::-'7. rv" -r•rY �y� ',.-• •••,:-:, :<.:,r1 >C!: '.i 'r.A..2 1 v"•�,:-•:,4,-..\:,..,:,. >t t: [S i .>;•f .y�' '� 'r J i' ♦. 'r %4%./ .r r r: :1\•• .,A. ,1.y: •r:::•.vir• .r.•. F .\ t/ •:\ > L' ' :yS • r• ; �P•-- �j�::.• �[r .r f� :-rvr<. i K`?1��'•• '•.'�/' .: rL.r/•.•.• y: 1{.f`r�• .• .r `j�-v �, :,• ...:'-':;''',...14. :a Y.'r.J V•��•i}�$r ;.�/�'_y �.�/ r' � •�! Y.f.�,y "� Jyy rr�• ';�:. (-..: -v' r S :ii `:'..ki.., y��:r}' f <_:- .',t•,^r- "'r.{!<.:-,''N'.,:.:1;W:':P'.', -r:•;l:i/ ciS •'t-•7a y'‘'..;.r.1.:"?' J: rr� / �•^ �',ti" .{ti vN,wH��fM.��s 1....h-��yrw.f WwL.{A �.�,•~ir•'v!•wrY� tv'•�i:Y.�'S-\ s �v�'G�•�S!••p.\ :�i i•�;.�',,�,1��} {r.•�:'S`r+!' ;k4. �:Y- r ) 1'¢7.i} .} :�� ff} j 45V:^r >'. SSvfi':.i}ri•.:}.%. }+•..¢: >#r�:.ti.^.::<.:S'!i,'��•yy fry y`�yf ./ ti•} 4: .(}' \ !!♦•'- C. •:Z v<;'•. r�♦ :'.�r. 11. iy :••r}S!•: -0 I r. •.^}~.j:{•�f n ..: k. \. �` �.. �.. rti-..�. �, �' i��} •'� .•.q�';•: �•'+?:i ''r!r�::,•r:ri♦.?.•:{...;}A.i,_�.. .�.y 'A.<,i ..a•.;{.♦:`�;�,•Sr:�:v,L:J�}...�,/r.Sr...�C�?r '!{•.�:�•r}� �r•i;�i }�.?7'•:�:n•',-Y.♦' ;.4.{� r••;!•♦..'C:!•'Ani;♦�:'.:n• .\•v}')~.:� '.'`, �^•,j ♦•.`C_ •:?!+•r al,! •y{.;r{}:5^t.}:r�rf,`./}���``��'•'y::•�lr.w.�Y'� ..}• y� r}.. r, •y#.;:fhr•'r�.;:,S♦,�1 •,•r+ ��. ..k•:•:�,...,.\v.J.':•:}:"7ir:rw,�.�. v: r♦ '.ys:yti r.•'y \"J.•r'>.'•:•rQ:C}??J. f{!.�4CC,'!r�,y�n': .+ •• -,,,. f�r/s�i• :i't, 'Yr,�/{���iti ;a�'':P �•ft•y4:fg'i ).&; -;1 �.:..:i.M: .� :'). 'i.g;_ i:J':•( C�\r<f ,,t,$ N. r'!..�...� • �'. r/r ♦ r r.!;.r �m•.' ♦ it,i•i Jriny,':!v%Lr}trr r ri} 1 t. }��t. 11.i"7i ♦ r• !{:Cy r.;: �r•��' .r "S:. r.0� �.. :W:�rV\1. rr:•r rr. r,.r.: !;,f?••.�•r.I:O " Y."�!f.t'-.:C�iRG•' € r. 6C' ,fy ,if•/;irY;>�GG•¢¢T•ir:.�%/.�..`<•:'v}• •,'•?CNi'.'/'S,; �r •irr• ./.,.,1.h{.i..'• i.�::i��.. :!Jr:{J`.0<: r .r .J. r •.) �r!r r.• ?" !r •r:,r. r i. r•. '7i1:. :•: I'1 r.r•,• i} r 'J,r': r.�>r.v�•�•..,;.. Sj.r-••':.,.♦y:. '1 � 7" •r'�y /�;�/.'r��{�J:.j••rl••;...J� r '.rgy�ri:'i.:•C .% �;J. �{.:Y:ti.�r?`,.,.�.:�:.i:. v,•��.�;:.r.i�•itr/J;,L `::.r. ^•y��'(�• i •>. ,�( •`"_'T�� 'v:f-•• S fo r!•i.r: i+: C :\.i'{"!:j i W �! 1! :• �Y• {:!\: .'}:•' ?:5{•i:S•1!•: %•sr,• 7:Z S!,�:•?!y.'i f'%"r Y" :ij .h'r_♦ ~:r• r. f:. :7, SSMC•'} .0. �t j,�r.. }t.i: w. .{�,,-;, r. per. �. i .t.4�•1::< rlrr •''>i•.. r wr�'/ �:iv'C.•:::.�GF•:r. \. :), ,s' .<;.{,r:C .t�•`•.1 •Fr;ls: JS.�. �•.YSiY;�.;r).w.i✓.•S!••��. •• � .. �� }?. �ti } :r � ':x ��Y?. �' "#lf'.r i•.. ,.� �sr..• !r:•�r•,•�, r � } {6. Z•!. .. i j}• .titin,r a• •JV.•}Y�i••�'{: \.,. }•.r'u_ .• �\��•'-.X^C - ♦`.♦•.f'� .. "t,.r J'v•-0,,,,,,;:r. ":_- :.j' f j �'�,r��. ; !C`:•2 • V'� � ;r�• ♦♦. J .:.•. Xr 7>U'C ti'; ` r S:`�4 �:$�' 7u%' � .5.. 1 r.v C••♦ �w ))}(�1y7'' �`Sr'♦S!•} }i:! ',1C •'h� '��••. 1}� , •S ti' Q'ti~•.•<)•Y. 7r.a)a i•.` ]2 f i'!v, 7 ✓. v � yy�{ r.• j.;.}::; Z ,,,,:.• hr,,i 1 ,,r_Y!• •^. -,-rti•J.-•,ti'.S' N.•,1..{'.`�..fy ,. �� fr.`i.,a y.1k. \� • , •,•f:p .,..,,,,,,:.„4..,,...,,,.,:t.3.,..„,:„..• Sy♦,... ti '.r.._r f!4• < � :Yw:.,,. •,.Y.:4, :.::,q,:,10,,,,,,.0).,:44.1-.1. ♦SS t �4 X!' ) • .,a � r -,e,;,,.!,':,..:.,..,:.- 'Se�•V'.♦.'rj,,., {L•:: '•�vv'•.♦ '.C.:\ .Zy } .!r� ri:♦' � 7.4 . r.: r � ,r ,�^[^�,� �C"l r. ♦/ ♦�/.:f�L:•vf r• �'. .!\' ♦�. v .{ L,,{{,,�� .:a}.�--05 ' I,,,-..• !. .?✓!})� irtii . y•. • N V ii•^}; w :t.•.:,.:, ♦_ " ::,.. .ri:.r !.`^•. yqi f_ •r::,. ,,•;: . ?of:� /' .{} •.• �..'_ ` . �� ref- ♦ Y:9 Sf f1 :. .^!.{ .. :.,' r,! I /•' >r'r:� v% -Ni i�S:i> r. tr ! 1 y}•. ..fj.�/�r?.ivy i .' f'i}, r�'4 � �r.�.;�•r 4. '144.M- 0: .1y' •.: r r ,r !. r� fr. : Y. fr '•' .r' ry`i i:'f`.�v1.i�!. :yC.`: �r'":•`,�i•. r r ,f !, :r4:,, �4 ter`, {,{}Q; rte+ ...v J .:c 'r� r.:rf:�\J.i:• :{'•+\�";y f w. ... ':: • ••1;f,�`,¢}`ya t•'♦ :.5'r :,-.1`.•.'�-{`�_.• •i N;21:: :: .tet ra�'� r si' .}!. 4:.`f•:,lt.t?`:J-:.'.4''',;:;.: > a h . t�i li_`J. ] ''v .t -`'• '.•' w �4 :\M::, : •.}•r'Sq G!}71:••); S?Caa''!�C ''� 1i .,{ ..''N.,:/... \•J :ir.i, :•{,,/'•,ivC \$' ` .,i ) X7 i-r t< 'q !:'L:3, a`S6' '*'•.••}'•.' v. Y. •:'' !F•�"• y •�••' fNO!!•S..,.:t• ?'6. �-`y, 'r,}:i .}�`�`�'.i:.`•.-v:S": #'. •:}:%•??. ' .:. ;yk,f 6:J., y:'- fi .<,:_€�o-�'fr i<o r::4` S{'�::.♦ rC• S ♦ • •{ {• \. �1"••,:::,.,..,....,.:„..,:„..:.,...,..::r:' v7�� J'J{i• Y'r� ti7 'I.y•YvZ.'in.••. . .vi ^ •� . ... C •. .- ,r.,'.i i..h�• ti[.a♦4:`{•.r•. t,..,...„..,......, • ti! 1, ,r w. ?v .; ,:a....„,....",_„,,,,,,,, •rr rj'.Y'.. ",, 7 :.`:','?T. .` .tir- 222}5 �� ♦a -.���',f,. �•�15.4,...,.,,.,7r1-.,1.,,:v,,,�S{:r'`:F y�'1 �C��: t:r/� i`,9' •� •r: KC; �. �Jy s 't�•' Y�:y -.!' {%'' QCff .•w J • •r.. �yy.. r �r�/ ;.'^.•: cA'•:f1�'S• •I.. • '�Vi� :•�.{-Y.� .�I•(� ,Cji.j!(. <:f_: r ^ ',` rr .. • �' �� `(` ,/,-;#A / j 6-4_ .;:;,: gyp liC rY,•-r��, ��ri'r'G•a r''t�:�.r'�.•.y�{��. r�y,;=,•;v� � f..i ter.•J,. : r• � •J�•J•i i':`� J 'r1{,��•'4" ;t.:r!'Y•Vi .�r' i:'.::•�r}ri%ii. S _ � y. .:1., -.7;:.vJJr. ♦ F'^?^;• "••i .'.•- , C. .Y�; :i •,'?���' i.� ii .K::. ••y`�1• r f.:''- 'i.:{-i-;.JQS{S \:i rr . �r/}y yy-: J. \:,: v;; ( ::a'••'{';ti r S{<(-\j(,�,-,(/{. /moi 3' ,{`i= '"�: n: ti l'` • I�}� '.\�w :(/.,.-�� �•?P'� ♦�I. j• r t -}}j�• •Y'ti.J-�•SC'.'raS rl 1�'i _ ,'A..r_1C_•.v4_•r -{-:t'-'+�, ,1�-{ •r!r •,' • A v, •'Y.'t •• •.� -.15 <': :.Sp^i '•!:. iv ♦r J.. �i:.\r w �{,x-_4r r {t:C• )�, 33 .• _yr Kr r.. S..................... T.. ::....... i:�.}•: :•• \ y•r4 •i�r.�r Y•.4 �• +♦ •7C...4' • •,�'� r � �•,sY r�{''?�� r y.r� ..{ �\:.•,,,••••••••,--4,•••• <:. \ •?.\: •. �'.�..'v: •♦•.'•Y 'Y•a' �' .,,,,,:,'.-........,',..•} a .,',.:•:...t .,.:.. 1•:n• .:-5$ , - ••{�,•,: is r':sS Y::-r 1,vi; J.:-•: {{:v:>:i}•i:.,{:�r,;...••�t '•J) ~•,•,:S• � ;•4•\1jr.,�.:f> y ►• .y; �'{. ••:} �. %`.t4-4.3,, ✓N,i7! Q 2 i:\ 'ti:•l!:<•�'3:J :4Vr\.{ tC.: ,}��_;_-• -Y•,v.1 ?' �.••. •,.%ti•.,�` f, ,,,,..,,,,,,,..i514:-... v.•,•,{,j�` R y...,.v<•• r• , :y:•r:•'r. .„::,,:.?raf#•;dr!•.r.•,:.:{`{:•i'?rs1�; :;• J e ti .v,. 7 i •. " •r•' '• :i}1,- ;4•J'•f'•G!S '• ♦`,..fv •v. •. .J,� Z,:t.• i•% �i?: •. �,---- .'i•:..;'''' :{ )r :S,/,;4,),! .,:: f•�kti.I• C r`' , a: 'r ,--'%;``...1.y Jlc! :.1: �•:r - :•.♦)r':.. { . • ii•' ;: %i'.f f't•.i•^''�: :i r1 :e_r 4 \. M..i`- \X' ,z.. ,•it Z ,,. r.•7,.{ f;,C ♦ 4i..-:; _ r fi'-� : vi'�.`:,{Y.!.7 �f,�,�ti,• Y•r�{, .,��j��'�f�{�,.Yr it .rr f• •r .:,:-.<4'..,14:.„ "'.r•r ,j�.•t• }•TY•..�^. - :\. n• n ,y` f''... ,•• t F?�':k�4 , , ,.`. •-C• ..sia.1'Y •�' i: v ,r.r it f i`r. f:�, L f�•vr f Z� <+ •,•dGG• Ci_v}'/rti .`,1�:\� i ;J.t_.� ,� �:'••�.•'/�: •}'E ri'•1:•G*:1)•• ��...,v • 9G� :,�:�Xr.v i i xt•:- .:44.c., ti• `•' Cyr T`..:..�:••-:r i •{_: �i {':: � .s:{ ��:i>Ct•"•ti Y!•+4 .: ��:•Y+'Q '4Z• ♦r ::.,,,,,...,:-.Ar.:, •.j�' .Siy. ;�: -• ri•.{. .r 'rr' .•<•r�l::� }',v,':{_ •r►•Y��;. .::: - �'• . - wry wry,Z^f,•:,.•,:fn : _ r. ?.4 _•.{•: Y:r:}.�!+•rl�:.�ti : }•?>.:�.�ti• ;{:;•: 1. x\J {.� ;'' •.Y• •{. :3�:•.\�r. -a ..-....04;e:'0•0' {. 2r:t a• \ {.' ?f r r',�y'iv,'":*: ¢ •x!'•r'•: {i r v ' .;:7:�{:4 �: ;�'+^''.,, ..%� • -. :{• T •:4�.fi•Z{ , !�G ��}J.irf':3T.�'•� ?v. .., .;,..�� r.. �:ct<,i! %•7i 'J :r.• 7 ••5 'tF ,. ):-y 'Xi p r !�-:•\ •v.• {: i::•v, :!S x-:••<v'•r; . ,v`{_{• i i:. :C^S���Sv:b•:'j}. A J J •}::V �vs'{:.iJ j.'1 }.`C w/ r ` ;: rti r-.4:•....-.<.,:,- `r,' . {• {T ;iit •r• }� -1.j��rt: i.:- j,, gQ�}r..,' {r,•, -f'r':•.{q P,rte.+! ••,`,,- * r•{.:'}.. :rFj ••.it.,,,...„,...-,..r ,...,,,,.A:a v y{ ��� •:{`.�.`W>�1i:J�?.�i•:iir:4rJ:..::ivJ�J•:rS�`. •I:�'.� >:{' �'_ •J,�,•.Z`t•:• ...:Y. :5C"if4�}i. ..9!�/.rf'PK": 10 BMPs for Six Minimum Control Measures Municipal storm water management programs must specify best management practices(BMPs) for the following six minimum control measures: 1) Public Education and Outreach on Storm Water Impacts •A public education program must be implemented to distribute educational materials to the community. •The community should be made aware about the impacts of storm water discharges to waterbodies and the steps needed to decrease storm water pollution. •Municipalities are encouraged to work with their state and Phase I communities to develop an education/outreach program more efficiently. 2) Public Involvement/Participation •The public must be involved in developing the municipality's storm water program by following state, tribal, and local public notice requirements. •All economic and ethnic groups should be included. • Examples of public involvement/participation that should be considered include public hearings,citizen advisory boards, and working with citizen volunteers. 3)Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination •The owner or operator of a regulated small MS4 must demonstrate awareness of their system,using maps or other existing documents. •They also must develop a storm sewer system map that shows all outfalls,and the location/name of all waters of the US that receive discharges. •A Phase II community must effectively prohibit illicit discharges into the separate storm sewer system. •Appropriate enforcement procedures must be implemented. •A Phase II community must develop and implement a plan to detect and address illicit discharges(including illegal dumping)to the system. • Public employees,businesses,and the general public must be informed of the hazards associated with illegal discharges and improper disposal of waste. -- • Need to specifically address categories of non-storm water discharges in 40 CFR 122.34(b)(3)(iii). iiTj, 4) Construction Site Storm Water Runoff Control •The owner or operator of a regulated small MS4 must develop,implement,and enforce a program to reduce pollutants in any storm water from construction sites of more than one acre. •An ordinance or other regulatory mechanism must be used to control erosion and sediment to the maximum extent practicable and allowable under state,tribal or local law,as well as sanctions to ensure compliance. • Must include procedures for site inspection and enforcement of control measures. •Must have procedures for input from public. •Must address water quality impacts through site plan review process. •Must require construction site operators to control wastes generated at site. • Existing erosion and sediment control ordinances may suffice, if approved by the NPDES permitting authority. 5) Post-Construction Storm Water Management in New Development and Redevelopment •Owners or operators of regulated small MS4s must develop, implement, and enforce a program that addresses storm water runoff from new development and redevelopment projects that result in land disturbances of at least an acre and that discharge to their MS4. •Appropriate structural and non-structural BMPs must be used. •Controls mast ensure that water quality impacts are minimized. •Adequate long-term operation and maintenance of BMPs connected to a regulated MS4 must be addressed. •The goal, at a minimum,should be to maintain pre- development runoff conditions. • EPA encourages the use of preventive measures,including non-structural BMPs,which are usually thought to be more cost-effective. 6)Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping for Municipal -d" Operations • Owners or operators of small MS4s must develop and implement a cost-effective operation and maintenance as well as employee training programs with the goal of preventing or reducing pollutant runoff from municipal operations. 12 EPA Encourages: •The use of maintenance activities and schedules and long- term inspection procedures •The use of controls for reducing or eliminating the discharge of pollutants from roads,highways,parking lots, maintenance and storage yards,and waste transfer stations • Implementation of procedures for the proper disposal of waste, such as dredge spoil,floatables,and other debris removed via operations and maintenance activities •New flood management projects should incorporate water quality protection to the greatest extent possible • Pollution prevention measures in municipal operations,such as golf course maintenance,fleet maintenance,open space maintenance,planning,building and oversight, and storm water maintenance Measurable Goals for Control Measures The requirement of identifying measurable goals for each control measure is unique to Phase II. Communities regulated under Phase I were not required to devise measurable goals. Examples of measurable goals include: • Inspecting or repairing a certain number of drain inlets each year; •Conducting street-sweeping operations a certain number of times each year; • Surveying all municipal right-of-ways to identify illicit discharges; •Conducting a certain number of training classes for municipal operations each year; • Soliciting the help of a certain number of volunteers each year to perform water quality monitoring or education/outreach activities;or • Reducing sediment loading. Implementation Schedule of Activities or Frequency of Activities Regulated communities must show an implementation schedule of activities or frequency of activities that will be done as part of the storm water management program. An example might include the following entries: Sweep entire x miles of road in county 2 times per year (71 Vacuum storm drain inlets 2 times per year ow_ 13 Conduct classroom storm water education 4 times per year : ..•.�,�}}:.:?•:.; :/i"%��t-'•:::'./'v.?•.,.: r.yL{•r .:s•,%a• :.,r)'1t:;�.C•.•'� '',:r.,�em:j..t.. -.'S T.::a/',Y v�' ;j:'l i oi us r i -rf1:�.v.�._ r•v. . by /y July uly31' �i1!+rC,? 1999 9r 9I!:J9hold Hazard Waste ' r rrr•%1 Q Y, r: t:!l r�'7j Y•r :r %.e%1ii•/*{wdm. ri:A:•..�:s} • : . ..r'>3•r •*ti•% ::: iJ- iJr... •}f%4,0r.: :.GImplemPernotgHaomsei:S• Yr{ f •" : ! : r_v:rr: � �Jx�f� Yf -'f' �%4ih.\%1!S/ 9V i •� � � il:x / �4�YTfgµn}lif )' 3>if• r . A0.e.. ...-77:::"ZZ.": 111.4Ritif,„4,.:•.-444)jiiifigitt4.effi J: 7a�;i ,4,42t,g4`? xr/ .. p /SlJ::•. %:, A ' . r/,:• • } 7:¢�rw�. - •r, r� w�4"-. i:w1•4 � :!i :ja1FX• r: r ,,,„.......4.;,_:,:. . •.x�f:'•.{ j..v.ti;4}w,/l�1s.J:.,,rF .:Ji!.�!• t't:,,{�Q:yrv'�4•! .1}�.i: t'Af1.!q'• N,:• 'r. }•1•••�6T•r:yr .•!tt, t:Jbti'l,i•C{ti�' .f!'•i,i.,....:::.'...,:.•••,!�Y�J.fi {i i�N �r• y •'.--,1f;.;.-... '*;2`4';:::•; Ffyi" :r..(• S?`` lf 1S !�* C{.• /•• 4 ��•i: ��• %"4:,:tirs.0440:#$04. ..:y � !•rK7iJC � r -i S ..a•5r•-}!r,4Y} 'Jt.:44..:;;:;oltap,-kgto. }iStr0r Yi {�• 4.Yr .�J ..:} l' yixC4-r atri ..C':_:(JS _•r/' �:i,"0•:•er.r :E }:•@.r , ri Yvft':,;'r:v';•.l,y•.Y -ii:..{•:•�g1m,,•,i:r03Siy'♦ !;.}•.•�X, .4>;'�•.S^ • � t. /�/.{vLtt.v.,.:,.•rnv. f, j:';4G:fr:- .9.i�:Jy.y�'7r•YFf.• { rt 0 ; 1:�;r;;•i•-^Y'.fJl y��r :} .(--.S•:rr. _C•.11:tw .i•. •!>r. V {,fr i :av -6 • rI v ,.:ti f %w :/ %�•>}•%wr;`iY1/b.G'Y i�:=•,.-,41..-.4',.,:.r....!-,7.-141-8,.;_:...-:-..--....; r! '}.•: . •r.r{'Jl �r_: }. .. k � v�.•.4.{ r { r:7. •' . ryf4tr:i�':.'ti>.r6r2 rJ• v:.' 1_ v} ,.a:{ _ " (}/te•rir.r QA,y � ‘ ',Apetypir,imelid-.4..:,,--;',.. ., ;.Y1 . :y.,:f4�� . ,,::,?...;:,,,,A.. _. v•,. ¢rr J"•Y.•! ! i. ! 4a �!. -r.,a• �,;.t{� - •:v•.w:t`,....":1,- ..-0.A4,4-....34.,-0.:',- ';•}s ,}�M, 't�}• •-rr-•i'frwF{ .�;{;vti. f;ili%:ti4•�.��:} n,''7'.•ii.ea�k.t� • �J.rtiLM%r:f3::� "t �;•q,',n 'F•: ''.iv � Y rJ {-. {.R �?i.*:;. r. i.f yYi!; .: :' g { "% :t:a v7.M4 X}%�• .• ,•;te /%?;•v�i`/ s tgjyY,rK 'rS!;7Y4/.r• r�v" s1fi ::V � ZJ •{ • -',0;;.•-••1'!,fxvS�r.• ' ..�:�� o •p.4 � f� rh� W ` a k,,-,f,,, •f ;' • .:•••.'•..,.'::::444;:. ur'•.ai 44 :.''..4.....:4';•••,0,M.:,-, :. v'.. •'' �%-! . .JYi '....i1::•:..... ...:: ::•• ' :-•.•': ••. y'.Illf.ANfOgk. Y� • ;.•.f.:. T':�.•. 43:• . } S^•: �•••':,i !O •', •{• r•r�.,-,:.§:•.,•.j: ./ %,• �!� /,:l�;f. �f•\J.4%tr•}:�5i.,.:,i-..,;,,,-.11,''.:::....... `r.? k} tt} 5�Y'1SC• '�L :�!. !•0 ,.: ••fr04Y' ,>,Yl -- .a0r+!0j.�ti•'i}� i•> rr';?}'�ii,•}Yrv/Jl }xi !.J'\ {1.f,!. /v'' ' i:ti • '�`.43.4:1•P•,•• :TvYvv:�1.l•^y� lV -:`:••",:',.-';`6.:-' ' -• .....:::S.,;',.:•;: e..}.r.}:iJY• ;.Y:'c; ;$ ..104.$1; { � vN::'r•�eS'{ ;1.•' •L•r,.l/i:Yv r " , yI ' vv • • X.fV•' •�.! fjy: V � ' TY' --44(:-..,* x=• '- .}•Y • .44: r• • 'y' •� .'.,.--.?;,:a.lri:• .-..,�.Y,1 fl. • •'Yr...�.:y/• i•a•Yivr:r:j:-r nf:..J- ',.r:rr%:: ▪i, .. ,• .,; .,..a.,..„,.., ...„.1.4::. 'a . / ..,,....,....:,..,.:,..„:„,7,..,, 1•. - ,r :wf, - rk� • fl r:/.• • . ; .%,, { jr-r'�,rfi;: 'y • ,i }:• �yrf.� ..V,' 'Y:•:. L'•yif' ., ,,:• ' . ,`s ,,N,'•*. ,r I'.r:r.,t:y.•5:. rrJr• ' r�C:,.' �!� :� }yMy.,-;. ::'. �.}Z}:t{'' ' `•• •4**-',,, �, .-/,;,y.yS C •Yh-1,„H' Yx •i ,F'ti':,:�i- • ad '.lf r. , ,-G.r_rv{�V •.ff -li!* :;..L?::-.?..,a Y•a ',,:-:;:::;,,,..,:v r'r',,17:-...7...,-. •.,. ti • 4 ' ,'l {�*/ },,t •}•- •.yYa_ } 4i'tiSGK', 0X.`,}.f/ ,.rf.�♦:/ : •6�!• G :Y ::� G .t• ` r1 7.•.f. ,t-,„;;K:,..-.,.... c• . -: \h:•iC j�.{`4.•�C• �rrC•...•lM%.T.,' .• / Ytf YryY; � . nsv,-¢{�l. 2�'t1yf:.�,,:i r��-0 .:N 1L, :'• ; 1A1a.t- .':,.�?..C>r•{v?0} v�•� Ja.pr Or!�tititifft***4 �' T4.�i/1�'� 4� ;A :{:_�.i'4.' ll •{'?'n'4¢f{•J:A^y•r5 1:..► :•i _441' •'vvrYh• j ' :{.,,}: i � ` :.{a•y: J:.S -ytYr...I.a '..:1,-,: x Y\' ,�r > :i+ <y•f i <��y�:a�nf��•' . ¢ s' ;•Y/r iv :/ � r •-'5.�4y' 4t.Ar:J{„i', iil •♦:R•��3•-;t7:0,-, r vfvr.� xY : 'l .i: :' S! .,'..,.'AiRgi.:14:::!:L::::!:::1:',:: `f.r.rr!,$,/':,..VAI: ar•:1," '.1•�•.: J.s Nr :,!':W:„. tKf• �: .� 0Z� ;4a.4%.1.7. } '.�1y. '.r!i 7% iy > r.LYT, i�? LJ •ni� •,\ti •• .,Y!r •.:'44,,,,,,.;:).01,0,14:,,,,.. . 'rJCAr,���1, ,AWf�frr4f3.{i1:%v: 4��: x :.y._ r:S• , 1? ,y. a'¢ ,• J,.� r-, :i „ ' :',�:}'. .. 7 $�jy�S:•vfCv , '::,. :• :;,,tr t-,-~ -`'• 4.'':r ic:t %nZ . ?,fi•v♦:f� •1•a �yr!♦�ti'::•4'�i �•rrri.f}i !, ',.tYt��-a:t?..,l :� { h{ {e- y)•4G�:ti r%•''ry•'S ' , �. M et, vffiS2�:� i l •�,r1�}�vr .:r/:',,:;:.7...,..•Yr µ ! . .v i !•.i•tif •4,,I*4•1%:4 -44.-+:;•••:,.;?;:fl'i <•::(:••i/K\�.tiy.isf,44•y Sh•. ;.n4trJ�:�:v%.;!v ,+-;••.`..i;4.-,.;:;,:•.;•,.-:. } r :r:..t-}•, •iAyxi`�YJ I:v i,.r ,}<:Ztt ,(,;,� a4:w.•{•6 :44 =1•• a Y -1?}:':1! � r.:4�;�J1f./r4 ',7 ` ti -..7...§:_...:., .4 ,r�.�r.�Y(x .;;,}.,}:^ ••J`:.� '•a 77f�">r��l��r f. } �'$ _.. S: C;.ZC:{< .r •.•. ..,...4-•-•.`:?..,) ...Y•Y<:q!r1i:,.y4--........,'-.,m4; ;,.- ;• ir :, .: /Z-.4 <'• `•J:{�4r '�{1•�:&}!,.K { tiStjfri ,aS,-�;� .•v.r{ •�C ., .•y�ir%;.{:}•:J•: •l•'i._.Jf'i(• : •, • r y:.t,!� Lp , �,':�.4-::::,64,1:41-71,... • f+� 1:fir•. :.i�K4 }"j ::,, i :.� ti'..r l•it):j'rt,a : %..rrI�,.0r7•.2 J?.r.• . /iJ� • ;"-.}.I, �{J .,av,.::Sti_�r.• .i& •�•'�r.,% Jtl_ira,Sy,<t,r► ^!-x�F � .7N, - irt i'.::• s_ ,. . ,:,9''•y.Nvr.i } �..` ¢.•.•r�yla.M;. ..:•%?}. 4:y'. •.1:JJ4Cy }!,.ti•Rrrr:' i ' ,!}r:i . V� :;''{< • !ir!:/ :"S'{y:.ii !•.{f��;l{4i'.'. • 41.4s1w.:;v:•. .,'z'•! _ ' ` ti'n3l.::,.} 'xti •,-{�.Y.riJt;�•<:%Yi// te !rrr' •,• : r:. . a ,. ;f.} r� ••.<:::\ av!( :.• �.X }�r•' �Cxi1;fFf0••%- , x +ff' . • ,; • }.P,:}:•♦/o: }v•%}.4f v:.:.:.0^0` Y/Y9 , SZ ?.;}.Yv.y vv-f-,:g:114'''',•:. - ,?„}\*A.. i..,.,....,a,.,••• . :?!: '{•.• •. fii, �'...,---.1. '.iv J; : � r'%Y: .'fJ,•t!rt• !/•. , ..' { 1r_ • • • • •r;f!.•'},>:::.,'}ti�%•::'i;.K�f_u�r►:`,•a3•.::l.i:i•}�iS•.v:'r,{.•:.r••i..rA\fY,t;...on•::.•:::.r?;.�.�,,•;.,{:![,:`..,',{Z.:'>:i.7A t,•.�+;..'::A i i�,.t�s-:-�,�;.JJ.•'1.:,!,i'nr.v:.:.•!i:,=.r'�7{C mo.i'.'�S'.;Sr•}''.^•.::.`t.?'.:.-.�:•'rtf�:�s•!}-3.ti'a•�/.,'r.�'Y�l+'•'SV:.c.•}r:1}..•l..j.,f•.�.".}:.,;.,r j..:"a;!1.'.�{:',..-'a•v:..i,a{`�.C1:-:t�,�''if Jr�.,!,',�•:r,}'t• .\:Q`aS�! v2>aL"`...\•,a.:�a•,:,:1•.•.>:a,,�t}y`-'.r':'i•y".t.;..tr1 .}•-:',:';•:.•r,:Y:r':>f\.:i�.r:•i :•:;-..,-15...::::':••0,,..::•0 Jj..y %Z..•::•y.lSr•v: r. /}�•- •f�.•/}•.f:• ✓ 'r .ia'• • r. /. .,,.' f • • i� :•'l:r::ri•, iKin /••• ,,Y y JQa{f ••: :,,,.... 4r�•t/ 'a�.x 4!\. I''' • �i,•.:. ^ .� . ', v, 4:,¢ .:i , {' � r ti: •• ,. -. .} { Y'-ay}� �„..,...,.,,,;.,...),:,,,,,,, ,...-,..,.::,.• �1 ..-:' .• ,.• I -.,:^,')♦y, .y ' i:,',x'4;$.$ ,,vS1J,. .,l',, l.r,,'dC �r: }^Y{.� .,,J:'!ti:'} v ^t �t"-• r. .j.-,i,:::.,..:::t:h~,: ;45^, 4}. S'.,{rT �0.a}r'.'ter•"•4.• {Z: �-'••.rr:. `1 f.•a 44aS i' a�.+•/ {iaiF/ \,J 1. :S S �•.:•i .:j+XqS•• !>f .i•....,,,.<-- .,:-:'.:4.:-•''...:44-.- .!57,'r. • • .iti J 's Jy�•�{,:"�'J,ir►- itst -,7+.. rrS:ny•.G f ?, , ,. J'..r1•.r�; ,�f :• .n _S ! .,,{ rnvvi^�r..l�r R •'i;v{i'�.>�¢ �it.•frr...--J:{N �> r . }.,-).:•::;"4'''::' ; 4~:( r-` 'ti; •,a•• /•.•'rnrr:l;/tJ `,. •. '.'va. ....y...-,... .;11,,?,;'. '• ,�: ,.•;t{:•.•:;:..-:5„.:',." .> J...�>: t:r•;:',2-,..;:,,,- ..;A -} '}L. •iTii.:j,:N1! •.:r •lJ �'':'::� :: w^'; � -,'Y :....,..7. A 1• , l •�r} ;:{. A rti•,:t •a,,,,,...,,,:„..,,e,,,,',:.:,::,-,1,:,::.:,.-:: ;.: .\• s}' .>:J..::i1,:t y- J!.>.y,r.•r�' ;,•ti�:'GC:r _ •. i�• � r,y''v..y• C;t<.:. !i ,{4:1•'r•b-♦ -'.'4:;,:2.4..,..,74.,.,...'-': ::?. •.:. r."..t.: :'I•tVr: `y.,r,1.r:i�..:f'•: f! .� Y ••v,`,,e:',.r 1 £.i:--ri{!4,1:4144:..,.4 f : � ,.< .{ J,: .' -f`lr`•:L r' {r''[(v•`%;:r +'., = : .`•\.- ,J �.. i •1,t-Y>J!tAaS..T{{ r}„ LrYi , .,'Y,v ,i<�hy,.':?••- ' :.:1. y,,„i',y}•a,1...' Vv' :▪ ::?`^•fffz. ! /:�� x.r,ti�t.:•'3''ti f.)�` ;'!C�+ Y:: . •�:v'• .r?a:J{ rJ'i. r:i: t.� y.FSr'••!Y�tr��Y �r•-1 1,�"I'f• Ww�f.i!,}i4`r�it�1 {/ 1 !f%`1 ::: .4. :'r,:an ,.";?.':�'�.;,,�..w:,r ' I.�40,1--� 4S . J\ 4 • ..)--- ) •6' r4�r{•Yfi �r IVIIMIZAIT;Oliitil*kFt. . 1� �•�.• } � .� D:11.7.,-!;{ C` y .iwnyVaC•' fY;Y 14,Pc-v / .•• ,• ;t)/ ���•>•."„1,-;', ,i1,-:-41,;,74,..., x� :,• n1 ' - # i,x: 1;.; • 2: r';/a7 i f ''',..'"r `. /���Y ..1 )•&......'-- .0;7.' •> %K•l�}rr'.�. . :tt'�/" ►,. r '4� s }.<+CY.� ?' r :J' yt • {..a�i��.r• •J'/• ••• -•.1.3 J•.•.Y-• ,lti•+a/�y• .J '.J�0y!/�. a .l'-z ;:• tN ' , •(C�r, 'F ' i-ri;� .• - : .!r •2 ;!.}4V,2-41-.. '.4L •,•�:� ..a.a+` U•'S•.k:�,• S ,1,'nr+? •.?. \;:.„4.-4.;•,•.,. -'Y •'�►.>!t.:'�f .! :Yi`•.X(l'r{ . #..; :•::' .{ • } • .� .:1:;1.1,0,4_:,,,..,& ' � �.14uC ),7•>{ ` a� , } r. ,.?, \.•r ':,. : .r.::`•rY :•a'!•.,J:::} /.fa .f. } � r'::•, ,�!:ti'r:1;:S,a ;1�� • J ,-SYY'a.,.! Sn•',r -rr;'r ,,y�• `:{ti V -,111.,„:„. } - {1 „tY'�} �3 rti{�,,, a•:r:. !.:}r,/f.r . �:(-:v.: Yi ,i./'t• S,.•:,41,,,,,,,,,7.4„n7,4,01.,,,,,:, �<,+ ( /!y!:y�` � y1.,,,/:vti-,,,14.: 1� :.,r•'•C} ; Who is Regulated Under Phase IC? Automatically Included Exceptions . Owners/operators of small municipal • Systems that serve less than separate storm sewer systems located in 1,000 people where no urbanized areas including military significant impacts are known, facilities,large hospitals,prisons or other and where TMDL assessment such MS4s operators that exist in an addresses the pollutants of urbanized area. concern if any are identified. • Any other system waived from the requirements by the NPDES permitting authority. All construction site activities involving Requirements could be waived clearing,grading and excavating land by NPDES permitting authority equal to or greater than 1 acre(including based on: projects that are comprised of several • Low predicted soil loss(erosivity sites of less than one acre each). factor of less than 5);or • TMDL addresses pollutant of concern. Municipally owned/operated industrial Industrial and other sources that sources required to be regulated under provide a written certification of the existing NPDES storm water "no exposure of materials and program but exempted from immediate activities to storm water." compliance by ISTEA. Conditionally Included Owners/operators of small municipal separate storm sewer systems meeting the criteria for designation(to be established by permitting authority) Owners/operators of any municipal separate storm sewer system contributing substantially to the storm water pollutant loadings of a regulated,physically interconnected municipal separate storm sewer system Construction site activities that disturb less than 1 acre of land that are designated by the permitting authority (,,„. ct '-W(T---:---- .' �_s 7 15 Entity Responsible for Implementation Regulated communities must also indicate who is responsible for the storm water management program. There may be one individual in one department who is responsible for the entire program,or the responsibility may be shared among several departments. Many Phase II communities have a more limited resource base than communities regulated under Phase I. Phase II communities will also have a broad array of governing structures. Defining an implementation entity will therefore require much thought and perhaps some creativity. The Phase II regulations are amenable to creative implementation strategies,as they encourage communities to take a watershed or cooperative approach. Communities may also be covered under a neighboring Phase I community,or allow another entity,such as a county,to implement certain minimum control measures or portions of minimum control measures. The regulated entity, however,is still responsible for complying with the requirements of the permit. In defining an implementation entity,you should consider the following: •What financial resources are already available to your community? •What will the cost of implementing and operating the storm water management plan be? •What other communities are located in the watershed? •Who in the community has expertise in storm water management components of a storm water management program? •What actions have already been taken that would qualify as BMPs under the Phase II regulations? •Are there neighboring communities or other communities in the watershed that already have a storm water management program in place? •Are there neighboring communities that will also be subject to proposed Phase II regulations with whom a community can share resources? ••••' Who Is Covered by Proposed Phase I1 Regulations? Those covered by the NPDES Phase II regulations include the federal government,tribes,states,local governments,individuals undertaking construction activities, and industry. 16 On a national basis,the following entities will be covered: • Owners/operators of small MS4s located in urbanized areas;and •Construction activities resulting in land disturbances equal to or greater than one acre. The NPDES permitting authority could, however,provide waivers for construction activities serving less than 5 acres if certain conditions apply,such as: • Determination of low soil loss associated with construction activity based on an erosivity factor less than five; and •A TMDL assessment or equivelant analysis addresses the pollutants of concern on the construction site. Waivers could also be provided for small MS4s if they: • Regulated small MS4s serving jurisdictions with a population of less than 1,000: (1)Its discharges are not contributing substantially to pollutant loadings;and (2)If there is a discharge of any pollutant(s)of concern. • Regulated small MS4s with a population under 10,000 if: (1)all water receiving discharges from the system have been evaluated;and (2) a TMDL or equivalent analysis has been conducted and allocated for pollutants;and (3)it has been determined that current and future discharges do not have the potential to result in exceedences of water quality standards. In addition,the NPDES permitting authority could extend designation to municipalities,construction sites,or industrial/commercial sources outside of the nationwide designated classes on a case-by-case or categorical basis. Small MS45 located outside of an urbanized area,for example,could be included based on watershed and water quality considerations.At a minimum,the rule requires that the NPDES permitting authority consider for regulation a particular subset of small MS49 located outside of urbanized areas. Other storm water discharges from unregulated industrial, - commercial,and residential sources could also be designated if an NPDES permitting authority deems it necessary to protect water =� quality. 17 It is important to note that the Phase II regulations also apply to communities that will be included under the 2000 Census. These communities are expected to have the same deadline as those r' included under the 1990 Census•in other words, 3 years and 90 days from publication of the final rule. .,i i%,::�.!.;i�'i.;J:'''i�it •. i:-:Y%/4', ♦:' .•3•'r/'�f: •i%r:!':•Sib::,i'ir♦•yr�._• Y.;y: .. ••i'i!:i%�!/-{:..1{i•/'�%i?%:i.1}' �. 4..1.! 7{ Y: r�f:. „r rri ti•::'.•...v:.•.f,• ./rJ•• '•�}':%{•:�j::. !.•:�<?..,,f!. !r r:• .r.,(rrv;}!. f 1 i. ti .•�;:f.. ::.� :. ��r.,::•:•ir.'i}::{:{:•:"y:Y.tiY a '�< '�.f. %��:vim\.r,.�•� r'•.r .?' • :1• K d •, i•..} {::::�.•. -.i+C;•::J}!i LiiC;ii}ry s.4iGy.•rj,c;:: ) rr y }i�::r:X: ?:Y,:a_i.:}<:.r%::4'y�if�',:4ii:•i< •.. r} 'rJ�-iv J.::. :�}'r�:• 1./v:._�!•:Y... .�i::.ry•.J4i_r...1 .v::':'• :•�. `•:,ti:; .f .v:'i ii.<•: I�':tV. lI I:• !.I. •> •A 4{t :�:•: .`r::��:•:'. •!:r}: Ir. •I: •Y :•7.'t::::':. :Y..Y: •:<':t. '{Lj S: •Y }N: .I \•�•.t J.•.\' :t•:•%:. .{..Y,a- }'.\ r :I .Y.:•:'"•••/' f.▪. .J:�.�:,:-I:':: r..!rf- .a 1n. r' .r. v. •r, r. r.1. `:w:'•:r. ::.•.. 'V. :f•j. .f.;t{.. i}�.�Y.}.�:-.1..•`.,}•'�• •.{: •r Y'.�'.Y: !.••• L�.•r''J.1�}•tt �':.{.-._...7: .t.1;7.'l•-.. :.f :•i: :is•:y;}%r}':i � K}. '•i r.{:rr.Z`.•. •i i •.: .{•'Syl :::,,,7:::::: v.r•::::' 'ii'•I,•:��' f�:{i:::�.. •i,•.¢•.;•i. :i 4+.}' :r.•.:{a:+y,.:,.7r^.: :\r:rtih 2:1 u*5 :Jv. ! •..•r.• i?.% '/.•fir••t,tS" d=r:is 1:ti••{il.r., .r./. r:::.•:1 a.:� /�f{�'t' •/� ', �r O ./ {-' !. ::4" �r•- ,{ ,�:;ari r•A+r• �;Y• r. J. �S'�'v �-j�¢:J.•. <k'• 'i! • ! t {'i M JJ$ •¢) r r�''t --+2,, SL' 7,,,,:i,•:1-:./ ry•:1-:./;•r.;:". •i 3Y.:•r ff t•{;T:r{-v{:' '`•'�} y:f:t. 1:.:.r'''-;1:....AillgriERt.: :S SC :?CRY..-{ S,i.fArcit., Cri 4, :•,r r • 7.•'ry'.•Ji•- X Ay r }' ifi,..„,":;!,:f4r;,....i.11:4,,7-,4":::::',L..e,:•-tl,"&:. !{i r. :f ., h' .4}•...,�!fr/Ji�`�•••rti{ a•Y r i • pijrr7^}'t:•.j/.•fs'�.fy rrr rfi_.•�r>r:�.'yr�:4:ti• . • y? :1 •f: :■♦ }C 'r. ,f C•• •••{•' '•/;•. :ri'•'♦'1�,.,.•• {. � ,..-:::..::.A-4-.?:; - -- �•+ w t S{r I�..�w.rY.• j!�.}9 .>.} > _ .\ r.•r - •�. r ''�'Sv'•Y;r :jet:i r�i{::aJ•:�r:{f:K{'i rrr�'•" :.' �{ F�'�• '',,'�.��tir •fr�Y^�r{r�Y r:.ti �' �:i^r.ib` {• :.ir•!J' .�:'% •.�:.�{ ..;K�, f{ .,!. •,•:t�y:r•}';:'!1`.+:,?!'vr.t t' , ;C:4;frit:-., Y 3S� /p-� • f'',-v ., y•�/�' , 2 i•'C } Ja {l�.:";.;'."7:. i /' .rti �f •t !�.r:{ !r.....,-;,,;: ..•r "C lar{: :Z 5+�� ��• '�{.:.;rr`y�{'%�!/�r.i St? ., �x�-'� fi J ri �„.,:,,44,,„::.,::,::;:i ,,,, '}'��'i'•'�rj'' '.}r4�A.t_Y v f: �.,'t:�•/Ji•�.,•Y.4.,�.rr vi% •;v: •:'j:i tet r �' •.. r,:..: ,t :•} �' - J •v. /:•r r •r .,r• f::•:.r'-4,;,.o-v. : d ,. 407.~::::'' ti• r,!i!. -} r,.:.. r:.>,J: !`f:=y' 31$, :! f.}•r ."�• ti. ! 'Y A•:'Y 1 A -}'.v.Yr.\•.Y.v{r: !/'.r, :a •� !{,rr'fit :;!�,� v t •, }.:7••,f;s t_` .f 4 ro l�: {�.f S r,/ �{/. {'�R::/.• r�,.'� :•��::-s.;J/! !!i%!' rf >.{ :r'� r:�C� • J,;� :�r ' y? r:.�.•.�{r}rw•:}!:;:�%Gr.f�Yf.wr.Y:r�%.�,lr_ �,a,�ll�f •�!'v� '!:.:•ii lY�'�///,�5•;�,i •%'r::}JS';i:Y,! .�r.'�;�' r}��. •r. r::.?f!-i •'.' •�^Pr.•. {rt}, r �.;.!.�'r,i/.r!- ,iyf.J i;:l.�r��::v'.!!•%+j:!{:•./fti fi .{ /r.J /Jr e� t.."t{. r. r.t r i,f,i{: ;,.i{ff•r{:: :r•i r:S� r.:{, 1.. r_,•.... 1.4 i. r. •.v!.i1 Yi::•:•�r•+! !/�'~'•�U•.v,YY�y.�:.vr�'�'r'�} r. .{ S 'y/.' : , :i•:••.i.'•{%: .3•.r !i:?it%!r" :•'l ti4ri-: x{rv.•:is:r•::•:-iG�:i.},:tiJ•::�;:•. .+� '•{.i 1. Y,.1�.,:i-/ .l•-•1Fi"f v � �f. • A.�•. rf l J,i.t•�� { !w•.Ji{: "{,�{ t .'}'. , +. ••��'�'r} :'ft'•.fi, i.b:�!{i{::i .\r.'Y .• 1:r/{.+�� Sr�i:,S••� .`(r. .,�'�Y';'. �����/j�<�.�i{Yi1.L.a!:ti'' '�' 'w•ib6L}�Y'�,,r.:�}.��i..'J v.!}•{..j�•�:r.}�rrl:C!•}�r4?'•'•. . '. .:,i*.'-.?..''.: _ '13b}'�f f,;K r'?f !.' {��r. .!f!!t.. !/r r�iii:•' j.,>' ����{{vvr�G f�.•:7�<i K•.� r i .\ •Y.}`ya. -1: � _moi.�.i 'G!•:; :J.'{r.r'Y�:•.; r v..x•i}y, .r ''•i::.:•:. •{ �:•:Y f:/r r } ,�,y��� •:ti�.. � �:t..•-r''+.Z:� {f;�i• {• :� ! :�.y�" ./}.yJ. ._. .. {i•r r f•.\tii.'.'��dvX iv.}}{;•:�!•/f,-J{t• '•{. .v i:: Y, r X 2{k•C t"•'.<:-.>. •} S �.� --M f�Y_{.•�}:•,•�i'}':i�r.J:.vi;:{ rfC- :�:•r:'r'i:ti:•.r ••;<•. ..tw:;a•f iS ;y►• :;}:}. :�{:4. ,1 {{ {•i: : ,.11,'!?f/t'•n'•( ti S �f w ;JC raywv: 'O', Y rvCf'•{r!.•t;l•iC''{�{. /••: a•, . •:!�•�f:. {Y{(:+;O. :•;{t :7..:{•:,. �( ?-{T. ?y��}:..::7 • -1{ %nr .!�^.vi;!}. Wryti"!Y J�i,f'%:�?:C.}}'�!ryC;.�'},.i s Tr'%t•:J tx•{•}r - Sr g !,!•' �:tT; ;�7�iC•� �'.'!.• � •i�•�,�•� ':' ••3!C'•"'!��iG.J;7•.?'.• _ �,w.,�aflP +v{�.-/•.Yl.,Y;Ja�Y�5:4n• :4' :1}�•v..J .ti:}.{:!.a•` >r�:•r.,�•�•: -,{? v. \• •:v. :1 r!�.4! \ >' r ./,F.,,,•. .r•. y,. rr. r •r. +"J!t 7:0•V. �(� �[ ' : yr,:: , �,r//v s. S}^. { r } ' [ j r.;}::f r r .}r4 '-:i:J;�� .v'�, :.-•!{�•..iyyr /}7b:$�./A(,C,'a'4.iY,, >••• •j•+,!L- 'F•f •/••.:{y., J is 1 Y yr�r. X,�%' �? A / r}. >r '�r 'f.}'A • '� -•;:.,;::.1,;-4:,i;#0.': f �.!'Y.�r'NJ} J� 'rV•T'7 :�:y�i,.y v :• i.• ¢• •� M�' �': . . ,R }j. �� .� _ .,. ' si. t:f.l., r{ r!G r. I 'i / ay Jf.{ `�' :•'; _ r r � t },!i f �.r t. -! rt i:• r! '9- r:• Y{,f� /{'r Y� !�{r��r .!•• I``f ~•i��..r! �}.• �� •. S t t:�ii� �• .'!{ :S�r/{.Y�f f-,1���f�:�`S •l .3�J•;{• �:Y.•�/.!:!'yy!Y•'!r�rrv._-_may I {. J�� •:S.' r:r' :..+ 4. ••:• -....:,,..-04,1.41i? !,'♦a//_•r •r .r� .lr: '��{}f.r. %W.•�i ,4,11,.1.:;„4.,,,..::: l• -.{! t.r J : .r r.. \j 4" ;•t3•i ♦ -. {:it 4 -CC-'. r. i.0 ••}r.i. .�' ! }. •, .. ''_, ``%z{ ti'.. :� r !}y. i:J�C•tiY}/•. •<iS } Xyj!x <j!{.tip ,}•??:. ,�..tY ,••..r a'v. ti - ; y 4. • r'J.• .� .v�`:•�.'75,..iF: .�-f,•�✓- ,[ .•i•::_i:.: -: •.i.•. •_}:\:�: t ♦. .. •,•:Sr{r•. { 1•t:Fi t•}E<•J�Yi, !.',fir?:i.,,•Y.' f�'ryrC•: '+` '•r' ir'Y-: {rv� }ri• Y:;! :'l' -r'i} :•. .�:�. }�•�}:Z�y:•,'•:r<r�' �•�. t' :�r'r } •! iJ'r{Y:'v'J\' ! r.4 :,;��rfY../ f � 'JD :�: 'W:\• 'Ji .i. ':;:�:. 4. •i::• .w -j�. v:� .vy. !'i .•J! x--...,-;i .; •n• r• r: �{/ ?' '.•Jfi}' . v ::f�:j::�:jrfy!.� � :;,;�r{,i-'•Y(.• r: +-"V`....\.rK}. l..a• .•<} 4 '�, i � .C J`•�•: rf:' .-•.t 4. •f..i:' \.x .. •\ ti ff ' •.:.t:ii4'ri:yj♦•,i Nr•{, ...�fir'JC i} •. i) }• 7`:t%r•C�r�,"9 v. t. ? }'a• v r 2 •' •a 1•S. 6 Y;.} .Y{C=rI r.nYc:•{4:,::}•►ay4f.VS t7F+' k'h =cr Y•+. ,'• S >>: ?:r C•.'�t�6 i : r7 J'{�''! 'AY�.Sr'{�'ri.y�i y�r.r::%.„,...:f'•• t ,1!,.!Y�' � �y'}� /..4.-:.::.iTf � +l,"t.4f4 t'' •r.i4r•'- �"�',S� •�'�;Nr !,`. '� -N:,r/' !.••. :+7V n'�••' rr• r r l w r .,4, �/�y�?, 'r .0{;4. '!.r• v -,---- J�/N. 'f-i�s•�.�ry ,. .. � rc'• .i.<� •rf.!�r ?� �: r•��'L'<� �':5:;:.: ,• •. 'yn •}:':°f`4, irYjbr'j.f•` � r • ::r• '•iix'r:r: riL �i .y . t v ."{ {^a 4}i:r.lr•L.� r:'::•/r'.�r,�' Rtr Y 'Y\G: ,, y om' j' I _ .•�. <'. /. �K} y ',T;�{/ f Y�.r Jf ,... _'♦•4 JY• :X`• 1fi'=t- ,.. 'inti.}r{1{:Y:�. .,•4y}. .rr•:•X k . gy m YS-`C''�•,'�'2Ci'it,^�f.fry" : ::^.. ♦:J.f..:.J�r,xr i'r• : -:ti:•�L'-.•r •J' in.'a'. r`1c4J�''.� i.'''. 4y \ �,. i..:';': •fi'` - 4tiv: �•j•< rti ?'r' �'�{J{'P'v:�i14_:'. , !•• /:5r„ r M.,;';''... ':♦•,<;: .0:." }�• ti- ..i .;{r r•. 7 lr 3: •>7 : . {•C;. n'�:}..t •r' ♦i t ��`-f+g.+{�},,•, -i'% i' , '�3 �'<•>.!/ •?. ....5,a.:‘-'. �. .� • v h\ ,�.{-1r:. .,',...'Ll� ,�,�,r{ r• �`�,,l�� �•/ �r 7 �,:,t};{�•i• �>��i•'rY { •.�y;{v+/.`�,j�: • }>;>1:••....5,• }w .•..yrr:, y r.• ?::ter:.n n,,•*,•Y :\r•-;:}'^ •r d .. :rtirr,'4K... :"-..;...-...<,;: - '�}��' '-•iY• r� ,:er� � v}:• r\r �^+.... �{..{y'}Y��,f' �' 'y+.?•..♦ :j�.:;.{�. �:'�• � :}'ja'{:} v:'' .} .ti}-r•�:.1,: •9.'::"..:,;-:•:•:. •• J ��y. {.,y r�:,•:�. •,� wry '�y�'0�Q)�'��' ,[-.• :4Si'id YSS' :r,•"•':�¢� 1;..;��.{r`r ^'v �f r••!'•.:\�•♦�''': }. T.•T:.rYl... �:n` •::. ��•r'�r.4[- X,:� •�'�.. •rr.�,-f,{ ' {:• 7({i:..':''C/• "j`.;. v,.�v. {,fa:;;.••. wa;Gc -S }j[J�y\;�c'' 'S' .,•.•..•Y' !Y. .! . y,�,y�G\f¢ r" 'y'. : 7 '•r. •:Y .:..:` tr.•• ,fit' :•rA•.•r..:'.�:. r r-,, rd.h'�',7�Y:,•,/,.-:^5.•. �.y� :'.:• r.. J '.!:�.f:?i.� ,.-f{i..'�r�:y.:v.�.' .•}. ..r;:. �•..i.,..•.'r. .a{....v'. -}..r� .♦;•.Cr.:4':{ �`:a�•�'{ � ,�! rti ::1r:•'r.•-.t.;A, r..S'y. ::a��LL <'•r r y i \ .�: i..v y.v• {•/',t.r1}'. .• ;'i:•: }'.).:{'.}`. :}.? n��rr.!3'•r f"i:•':��./IC''�.'/,Y :S�. V:•.!•i.. -r.r.�r�7' 'J r7� /.I.VI•' ''' / �•••••r•-�$ -%.'7, r..rrCrY:.'.. :'Y i.�r •. r�..rr! / (/• !I J . :r•r J {.,t,.. '�i i r !-is :v'::t:%::\ ,► :v_':'�l){-y.t;�rMYCi.:,•:i,f.,:'wC•:;l.*: <•:. r •:{;;:C fix...k. .!� j :4 ! /'^t;::i. :t{:r '•f'''`i"•r�'•'r "^ j �Y Y. .;Z -+r(:\• �i•.I !•1 i�i h'.f !• •�•/(<Y i Q..S• {/(� :�" Ci • i } I''f J• t%..-. Y /}J I {!4, 1(K.• r% J r •4. ,•rra�?y�y�y.-r S},/T w w.�l ,.,',.i,,,, .'.M .J(/ ��\:!. • Yr i \ 'r'.;7.. .\., .4(43-(]}.:<`-r ,; 1`,-IS� _ •`^'�c•• -•`.`:.\-N:• ..�C.'_-�;;{,T•,?e' r�'Y� s,t, . .}�?.�r..3. Y •�- '• .,�;•.•>•_•,+a{. •' ••-•.r i.� ♦'. r: �i..w %n'r�rvn' v. \•ii a: .:\ r j<•.\•:.♦.!. Y ..H {. 4i!- '.'�:: '''..'4,,,,, I f h •��'} y�yf , : S I �'I _, r',0 �]!�VIKx:•r .�_r r.`y v-,,,,-....?,..,;',,l, ,r(y?,... 1 5A'Yom} :¢• � Y�♦ Y J�1�4�.• ���TYy • �`r y',S � y���'�,.'A'i'.'h�'YJ/•�.•:�.,.'-.•.-ate-Y.'�r7K�4J�V Y ��` .�Y :.-Jti• }it{/,:�=,�'T• ♦ "-.<4:'ry�rrjri y} r ' { ,_i( kS:j. t .{,C.,,rr '/! .�Crr,, S•f...y iSi•', .•;004.:,:j.:,:j3 ! ' r:"'!4^:'4aT' ::Jcf, <{ r h lrrC•'r{G=;' ;*K •>. C(¢. { `y. Y' r S�:rrf :iJ y,•'� v.} :ti� r:l .<0.•r ,.�r"T%}�r. •• ;fir, r •fir•,:!v./A�/,'yy'y�r, -]yy{r^�y �lQy, i t•:. ,-/+ Y y l7r� J� �r rY / ;�' Q�rJr'�;A• .-♦, ,•. :XIa.:%r.�, RJ'Vr:•,•r:�}G• $r ti�:�!V�' ! �` '1.•}{;.1{ ,:�,:•r�':ice Y:.rr.Ky'4'�.rl.;!.NJ!rY~':'ti:ti:i'4'.���..'�;, r+ ivV.Y'� {S!• ▪ Y.1r}f?•%i.r 77rVV!vL•.�r::::'.!i i XOit (rr/,tlr.:rrJtii..rvr.4 .f .• r` •�•.4 /43: yyy���} �, rl.:^''�'{• .� +'JJ r:. \,�.���. >� .f' ....6' .�.%!;'>.: .,�r.l �-<•.} C.ij•!rY.<i.r •Y.•Y+. �••-..{� }'?. �': { r r/'Kf t`'•'J'i/<i„j-,„:„::;♦..: {! {•.w:•/...i,� !!. G •♦. ..• r,S.n L,?, [. 1r.••, Y r. : .r.: , %r. 'I ••/ G r it r.r. i/. .y!•' r• '<•?• w :i !�1 r. :/:�:!••I.Y/.:i.•.Y v.•.•/< n• r : + 4: y ,�!•\/. /• � `fir. a•::ti y;y i f r:. Y f..¢!f `C .%,y(•r� ti%4\i ;:✓: r, :r. {• ,?'. •fjJ1�' T SC• y-� �j•�iC .1 �.:'i J.?. •t,,,•„,.';,,)'•• : •.)Z.S 3i•! 4 r. s •� !•j>•r r.• .{•� _ •,ti�:; ."-•:';''./:: .:Irra! r�' rV f:t •'•'"`'t/..iiti-i �•yv' r Z?r �^'f•+7i4' rZ•. .M.��• ?�, /r<i� ..• .y. I T/r / �j'/.- �rjy.:k �/y /�` ' '4 yam. lJy i } {7 r {rg f•.b%a. .. •,t..).:::,.:..'-a4;..- .�..'.V". r.,I.;f vi/y�.��rrJ.��:l�'' •N{• �Jir. 'r tiI '�`JT.^f., .�.. Y x'����T//Zlyiy.�r7`.•, N.•� ;l!J• •��r•''•>L•.•. �: �.{'r• �!.' !.:Y✓.�•:v-.\'}.'.• '`'?� Y..'v�•'/: ,.•a -.r.K� :}C••rrYY 77r.r � �j. �' :�"/ r. r 2 •t , ..-:,:.-5,,E, r. } .Y: ?••/- e \.a{., \;'i yP ,. .r.r.•.�y 7'.•. ti:%:�{:�ti Y!,'~(• .t.�•'�'�`r'f:�•v,�(�r�n•.,�r�fi'~rS:<;Y'YS'•'�'�`�''O��^�{f 2•�-C''1:r:�r�':7C t t t �� 3 a•�.:��: 2r` } 2 i•7 Y- i� i-�4:,:,.,g•�• ;.�:1n:,�;:r Sir'• � •/`4 � t•?: \\• ♦'::�a;��{,,. r .Y''1'.'+� M •✓ti ,.. n {• •'.•:ta`'r.:}. •v.4:7}x4: ... '. ��� '�• r;J it,`:1•..: ) ..-', � tt Z f�'�••}�} j�.r�l.�g. �jty.+' 4m' f�rya•`r+�{y��{',`"? ! { '�+rry�•�r4':�(''::t�'rft�v�,'vLSi!rl�9C -ti r {' • k.'t,,,./ �' `•�:,..: ,J� .'�+-•/'r.. :74:•,,.r 4..`f•: a• ••!r•% ! •i v TStiv.-:r. <i 4-• •r• '• Y..� r JC ,j*1,3I,c N: � ')',:.; y �:fiiir. .5. •i• v.Y, �•• S• '.4• . !1: :•` ><%r i t'r;'.: .K - t',::.,..':Z!-: x:r ,, L 1*ris. 1';�yi. vrt , }. .Y. :i J' •' rr �'� r41Y,,,...-.1g.„..-0,):$1. �' ir• !' Y,v .' !;..tr,,'�r. r: •. r.r.r +�ii. Y:Y,.' y .1:'• J. 4/{ �+�, Y .•+}+;:•. ty,pmft,« y. ,✓ SY?'�+} r�`� - •�7•:9!`�/f� 'r�, �r� �Y+-J• •{r'n: �••� �}:rJ:s i� iJ�,- r:.; -� v'tiY• �'� ��Y�••_v.\• •• f •'1. •ti•:v 1r ./., a r.� _ t : a �-�� ,;--'‘1, •!y{ '-,T.-:,,4A ;lr 3t .; 1-:`..1: +v` :'�S .�ia•_�� -�w�• : . �s•i�f^�YrCr,y .,,,�/ J,.•T r. ^;fir � '"''S:�+ F, i •'• t 'J t•i:c^�•� `j, -� .;!. 4:i r• :'.},'�sj•- .•rfi''�?•.L:• a� b�i:':, h$; C''f,•;. j^.S�'�{C�`!S.}. �{C .<ri:!•/rr :�r••� .r >.n 3"}'r�'. -i' -x .ri♦ ,-,7iv .y:�,- �;•i .�' ,'Sa }• /}' r .. r••yQ•! .Y.�/,n r/ - r. .r. ,,r• •.r. ,1ti3{:!1}rXr,}1i1,}r�4:N��r v ...,6 {,t:r `�-y ).}�:"C,,r r..j1 ;.'{!G�y;•�:v4 �`f}v•r.�i!�.•rr!h.r.�r.r- :v'r,•�: %� ��•,,�•y L Y^!r�'1••}:,•?: r• /r.1 rw {'''i' S`}: ^?'' r }.<:�<}{ {.•'..r i rt r%:r..+ + 4Kr:�v'y, :'' {�w , (y,..,?V?.Y.�,r�+Y fi r. %•i•L t•''C..-%1.`f}!.`. Y>r:•J.'{•.` '',.. {.' }¢.,.: {...Y.4 : o':• .�-4 -1• :P•, .1 •{•yf.%vt'?•)\:[.kq ;; 'ti } }r:• ..: .:�'f„•/•'^''I .,tir. y,-`!�.,f•t.^•,-i.•!. -?:? 'ri:i .{'••i:•:r/r'' :. r.,>, .' i•' .. r .�rY'• ..G::•� ' ..i r ry .•r•, r4 N:•.• r;.•.•. •'n',•/' •i\•�^� {' {•Y• C'• •• + ' } f..}} 777 , • .:.7�"J:'J�rr}}:•v•.. r ..„.. • r.,. t � • •.••:,...4�'O<-X�,•.,•}r{.:i.i• ..„„,kk::,,.;:::::.,:•:S. . ;r.,' •'�A- ,:l :{yam,'{•I., ....f'i 7 •••;••-••,,.:,,,,„•:;,„.••••.,::.,..„� . : �<: .vt r:`•C}a r:`r,�•}L.}<♦•::�..•J..r:r �:.r,r ..�i.•;:'' {,\ -£.......;.4.4.,...0,, !!•.T/��r,{• ky/�r+'�•�::::•'.AR♦��r�.G=.r• '�•� �:? •,....,,,,,-.'i.i :•,,,\i"'j. ;:,:�•*:,.•1 }•ll....♦:3>y'',4,,:, SY:'::V•vt {. i !•.r ir. '::- •}' .! rf.•. :l.0✓J rJ:iif/'l ,��A%: ••''.r•,{:Y jW? 1 g 1 What's Involved in the PHASE II P Process? There are two types of NPDES permits general and individual. An individual permit is a permit specifically tailored for an individual facility based on the information contained in the application(s). The permitting authority develops a permit for that facility based on the information contained in the permit application,such as type of activity,nature of discharge,receiving water quality,etc. The permit is then issued to the facility for a specific time period (not to exceed five years). A general permit is developed and issued by a permitting authority to cover multiple facilities within a specific category. General permits may offer a cost-effective option for agencies because of the large number of facilities that can be covered under a single permit. _ Permittees usually submit a Notice of Intent(MOI)to the • permitting authority to be covered under ageneral permit. i _ ,(--:� :di" ) Generallyboth types of NPDES (individual yp permits(individual and general) ii .ni are obtained by application to the EPA or to the appropriate state agency. The owner or operator of a regulated small MS4 would be 18 :y: :tir•'}Y:. -f {: } r.• <r.:r>•!•:i:.*•�•i :r.�•J}v•:ri }:..� ,,.,. .t' y. .•i. ly.. .S. .iA:V.'r.f.. ••••:::..,..,...•V•IJ '.,.'.Y S. :::::::.?:,,,,-...,,::.:.:::.::„::::: , -•is f;. •T:J`Y. '.,r ••+: _ia,.Y':..♦'.. :; .\}•-. .vr, • :r: L (. v /•..;Whicihrt . .:7�': .r..i'•' :�'.ii. . • J}�: •f^.Jlirr •J!r,� :/ •�• S.::i:� .r }%�:�. :•if: :r.• i•1.. :'{i rr::.r. J r ,I�.fi:?:::=: .. �/% r. r J. .r' I.. S� ,:,:]:..:!:::::::::::• ::::....!,:::„..:....,:...::::-::::::::.,.:,..:::!.!: 1 /fes ••i.• I ' Y 'J /:• {s > . .Y• r fi j 'J. ♦r . : Y•.• .SM1•JX• '14p0 •�5:� S� }T'�' r !. Y,r� ir..: • 7. •Y i,Y� , Sy . .,�. '• r.r •r n•/.• :•r{r:j rt.,+.i;:;•.?t Y.•"::: :i' .r: •r J.� A� •z: J- .::::0• .iii.r::.Y.11.:::•iN Mf.'.:N!.:CP4TiFf1.1*..,- 11?..M.i?...::::::ii.l. • fArry_.• y)� r• :i rr.: ./ .Sv•ir' •Jr. :9.rf'/�..ri�r: 4G::r..'%r.�r :i• r.,�•. 1�J,.•i%:: a•:.•.:it / �•:•- �.'••.,. .:.iIr. iiiilligii.i.i: -0-....i.g.:. r. .i { •!:•.r:i.. .•r::•!�iii :ice; C ! i � t '//l• •'::. - ��11��//'' :tip: r.•:.:.. )C. 'moi fS s •.%•: r n !: j r.r, ' �.h{r•• ''A•i: . '\'• . .•r: r M :• ♦.'::y :i:' �v.•_ .'�:•.v .4.. ,+. . •:•G;i. :A•.•.:Sti•.?. ''r: •i,....At,. .,...,.5.mnm: �r,�. %moi� .S:• %:S:•i.. \•:�.. � '2'•�'y'C.<. '•:•fY '+:,.• 4.Y'$ :)N•{:'� }: .::..+;:;. r.•: 1:;:�,•:l+'/."�. :.i.i'.v:•i:.::.j•::,..{.;:•.v, r.•.:Y4 :. ': : •r' ?{i-.: : :j !ti•- :�r.• !rr:• :i,:�i�i.• :r: :J .! •r..•♦}):••'/:l.iv.. :y 'J .tY,'/• ♦ •y,.) :r:•J :C 'f.\. ,y..}r•:Y.v.;•. :�•`;�t� :t:. .;r:.•.�!�":r. v. � :{•..i.!. ./.. `•'2•:}! •i::;Ji'Ji' _ 1 '''%",{JC•. n i'� •' v: }w'r'• i' � .!..y { f',.,•x•S,>`. •ir Y,:Y•.i.�{.. :r• T r) S•.•/,>i�••N''<e,'....,: -,:$0:,.:' , }'.-0{:; r•.� ` i' ?. •�.?�'r�:-'`r,�: :.:::. ! :is 1{: :i.'.• 1'• rr:'= ` t S ti= '../..%.",%::P:::::3::.:::::1: �{ r/,, .f{v. 4.T �•Y 7`i+:.�S • + .,•r '•:•:ti; .•i:v.•:rr.'.. h / +...� '1'4ti•}' r.•.}.:'if;:.Jr�..r f. • '� C •.. :": .Y r' ��,� , :Y.•Y<• .. !y.. :;fir''%;:r':�;� J[.:'•�: ,+., .''::f� fir �':••. Cly• :`.', v •'{i '� r;\., ..y, {::'.,,\.�.•. '.?lr{.{{�•.?:L"/r,:,l,�(.:�C,.•.� i!{!•,:�. JJam�''!}' :' Y ?J N/.7:•:�S•.!�'.. r +. i. ,/:::.- .r: .\.-;5:, .{.-��••CC',' {Sr.. ✓S''t/y-: Lr.v JS tX, CSS ♦.\f r {r:�i:• J. t !v'•:•S: :r• :•'- .l' i. +. •'I.••y:. :!; fit;'y �Gy >• • \}{:4'.}:::r�:•::::'.•:4. :i{:{. /.i•.�..�r :i:::'r:•(r•��a•(,' {� <:r '•Y:•{:•L�� �.tl{•' '•i isv : v'� :'i}:..•i-i:: •Y.�?.3 •.,• ':�:• .!{'i':y'•::•}C:: VL �4j '+:, t:-.4.4VAL44-;:::':',1141:1•-}:,'•.''v} •:i}• :- :/,.•. !y,..v'r:r 1. .♦)¢� :.•. '•X:v:: .} ti : a4' :ar►;, •J.r •Y. iJ{..rri::r.•:r:n•%ri:..rliC..n}• . `,,•����rr � {{ � a ){:••Z..}; } i:.,y_•:`_nL{.��{t L!'v:i} r. '!.: v. r:i. r `�:•A;i=:t/. . �<•• •:j'. ;}"''• •: �4:.' ~ � .�;:S'}C•:. .;yam•.. - 3� `•. ..,�.� �. ,eta\'.: .,,::. .,:;;•..;..,ii!:i-•'•r.%G•i{%�< S -q:♦ •A' .+•. J fw'.: �y '� :i S t rJ'w;< v r ti .r rs � ,• !:•. ':::::�: ''• .,; r. ri:r„i?JC•'•.p .f!` ,.�'.:} � Y w*.•_r f < y7> , r r r :.:;:j-:r-.�•.•' ��{r i < .�L Sit 4:+S�Z: .:;,r'..:-/e .." � '^ 'd' >r' {i�S, '..•'�(Y'• C. •r•{ � '7 S•• �.� r.'�r�C�� fti. ..iJ.t!i •!Y:'r/•r r r7�: .. 1.J- �/'.! J •.- /• ,r�• ., f 't'.� ` :'011,4,7-.2 /`,{:-�: Y' r! •-r!':•.•!'•:i7•;. +.;v.Y/•rr}fr{i!•}J4 is J•.�:T ,`, �' _. r�• Jl�r i.•:}iC r'rri r:}.yiT, 47:-: !/rC l'/ `/•.i i Y rJ { t i**,,;1 ".:`% :• 4.J1`'.f�S; .$,.;:'i: The application form is reviewed by the permit writer who then prepares a draft permit. Once the draft is ready,it is sent to the applicant and published in order to notify the general public of the proposed permitting activity. The permit writer then accepts comments on the draft permit from all interested persons. Revisions are then made based on comments received,and the permis is issued final. What Do Regulated Communities Have to Do On an Ongoing Basis? Under the Phase II rule,regulated communities must conduct periodic evaluations and assessments of their storm water management practices,maintain records,and prepare required reports. Evaluation and Record Reporting Assessment Keeping Requirements Requirements Requirensents • Evaluate program • Keep records required by • Submit annual reports to the compliance the NPDES permitting permitting authority for the 1st • Evaluate the authority for at least permit term. appropriateness of three Yom. • In subsequent terms,submit identified BMPs • Submit the records when reports in years two and four,or • Evaluate progress toward requested by the more frequently as required achieving measurable permitting authority. • Reports should include: goals. • Make your records and • Status of permit condition The NPDES permitting stormwater management compliance authority may determine plan accessible to the • Appropriateness of monitoring requirements public during regular identified BMPs appropriate to your workingours. • Progress toward achieving watershed. EPA encourages • A reasonable copying measurable goals for each participation in a group fee may be charged. measure monitoring project. • Advance notice of up • Results of data collected and to two days for analyzed during the copying may be reporting period requested. • A summary of the activities that will take place during the next reporting period -� 11 • Any changes in measurable goals 20 ..i -•.....,i,ii:;:::-.'.--rif;i4I- Eii.flIllitiik:'1::;:liiiiiktitittgl!ditikkiii, ir:51:1 :j:Ktl'*;•44i:%,i:1...Y;'...--cil:?ii2Ai:•,:;:.ZZ:-::::M''4:i4 ......„.,,,::::.,..:-Ntk4.,,,,,,:v.•-,•.' ,...-,.-.„, •,.:.,.....,,,,,- :'.... -‘k, 5,..s.,..,:t,*„:,.....t.e *,i!'''1.--1:..44",,,44';'.'4'... ,..,.•i.'-'?.1:4PlittliiiPtik-tc:1' :Pirt".:.*;4 ...,.>:::.:2,.:,4,.::::. -..,,:;-_li.:::::„.::,:,:::::.,,,;,,...:::,',k..••- •.......,., ,,..,.0;;47,.,.....,.:7, .1"-:e.,...1,>.,., -i•, ..,,,.:0;3:ii:::Ii:::. :;:i'iii, ...,iff::.13:": .:. ::-.4}.;j'. ',1,.,....41,-;0 lt,',Lig---;:i...'411 i". ..•,.',.,;;E,...ilii:.*:::.-:;:A.,2:14,.:*i:.A:L.:9,:k .., •...................................................• •--1'.'”:'--1. ii mi ':.:;:.:;V:Iti:';:!.:11%.f::••*:•(::its*::?'''.."3.: ''.,,..;:;',,:a,',4 '"...:30;,....."'.*Atn.'7,-:''-::!...../r,;',r.;:"-'•;•,.:- •'''.14t:' .'-'4,fi. :, ;•.:'''.::;:•il'::::%11.41.*:03.1ith Oiligel.:.•:,:":. :it:Plt ':,':,3*...?"744;,'••••''!.St•:.: '-:;,"::-:..f,?.'"...f';';.:.',,'.;1,‘','...,./:13.-.::--_,:k...-".4.'"'',,.._•;*I'v.:*.,:iTti,it,-.. :•;:;,:i...'.;'::::i.:;.i.:41.:- i :?-7;-2;;:tki'l .:44f'K'f%!., ;.{:;'•...;:4:4P.V:::',,,-''. ,,.13.::::...':'...:r.4,1,€>1!'":4:,::::;:<-...?•;,-:"..1, "'1,..7:_::i-,;...,--t-i..:„.;:;V::44h1::- ..1...:..;:::-;:•.;--..::!4::::::''"';'-''''''......?"47r57,-vih.:::-k.' 4:0.;--....:4...i.':..,:;.,,::AL:''.:-:-.."--t.(•.';',V.:%:.':.....::::t•Vi, :;***, P..:::'1::::!-::*.1,13.4.t::14.1,:ti A .::.,.7,77741i.:,7;k„..,,,-;!.::..!1',ii.,r.,daiifoli.*Ln: : ;-',.kit ;-'-'7::.-4f-'1:4'..Wq.s;e'''- i;:41e4;'.;.-'4"-''',!';.'•'''''''%;-:'-':'''' .:.,....-:%..3.',.!; .:.:.':."-...1.>:',... :-::':-.-..,.''.1i.-.<::::Ii:.:4::,.'.1:::',1 4t•-•'..'''''.;'...t.,..1.#1;'",4. ....'....'''-111i:':4:1' 4-!if,741farvi!.:N...4,3:--,A,:,. ; .-..:-......1.01;t11 i : f,:g.,:t,:,..i,f.,,, 4 .4A ..::::::;i:i1::,:.1:::.4.:qi:::1.1:•;:liititilift#:•:4 ,74f34-,..:,. ;:'''.t:. 4,4. tlfiAirnit:,711114.411(1..,..iii•iK t:, if$:54a ":_:,',.-:...i.;i;lii-:....:.i.:1::..",.:::-:ita:::,;4-:4*.•;i::!5"1::.!1:P.',*.:..4.i._.ffq.‘,!,...,,.,.'..);i :Vitt;:.t.;...:1111,1:1';:11114.4•Ifkigja,. •i4;t44; •:•-•':,i-',.::, ....t.11,4)9p::11%.* k., .titi .,....14"..3/4t.-,..:1:,...,,a.,,i.,,-7:. :.!,.. k..14...1.3.2i-:.:4),4iiiN_410 t, !..:• ._,,.1.4..........,,,,,,,.....):-.:::,-,: ::::,,,),..A.,:f.:iiiipAitr,„,c.,,i.„,:,,kr.-1;:..1.211 .4,.. 4.. ..±1, , 1,,,.. .! ,:p-itio.,1:4,,....i...,,:../y...::.0,.-;:. #1 r .,,..„ ,,,:„.„.„,":)„,,,..,, ,.„,,,ti„.,..„.„,„,,i, t „, ,,,„:„,. .*.,,.,,.._,.,!,„„s,,,,,,,:i,.-„,,,::: ..,,,,t,„:,,,„;.:-.*.,:. 5 „;,,,:,,..,„„„.,:,,,,., .':•a:....i::''''.:-.'i';-**::,''.-4,.'":;•i'l..;.,`:''';'?,(.'''-'1.,i.?:','5':',(:::::: :''0'., :"...`it,,t"tWif't.%i .7.,,..‘::4,,,*1 i'-...!#g4..,,,,46-;',;),,ki 1.':-.:46.:414.f.A.';',,: `.',3.,t1.;.$4.3,,.?•,••• .:',., ',...:,f;:?;;:1:: -.::',r,r;',:,'.:Aftt:0:".,%,;-,,,,;: ..., ' ,i:•::;:i -14.,,A-...:-3:.„**1:.?,,k,:t... .;.•:R•.f.,,.:,,,?:i:,,,,:tv4,-,1,:%;.,,.;:<:,,,,e,:l.-...,,7,..;4,..-.::::-..'.:,..:Z,..%..: -r.1:''',';,34,;10..%*, 1,:1',--.,.,5-x.. ... :„.......:.:14.40.ifi .::4-1.:`,:4i.,:'-...:'3ilf*(::.:._,;„,i,:,..*?r:,'...:.'?!:z".:::.:..-4`.,:v:,:..••••;,,4::1`::.:"L.fiti':-'$o:7::.?,':, -;-..'---<tp.5...'"'''.4 .-71"4::'-'..'?4" t:d.:44.4.i.ti*4414.4.:Mr-p."*.f,1,..',Mi 1,:;-;;:s. ....../..-r.;:-..'-.*:*:.''K.','.,,::"..:•\r.'.A:',''..::4,',::-:-.Z 4 i7,,,,,,171-?:,..V:•-,,,Li)..:-:btt,14:1.::'Z.14.7, I.Iiii:44:4::Ai,Alti.i.-::.p.:i.411;...N.ig. ,*'::i:;-!- :'i-:;4.::.::-.•;e:.*Mr,*;".. . ).4,:it'iA',.', _;;f•WC,4;',;_,''.$-•,..-'3'1",.-..-":'-',.--.!4.2:----pi Iiii.:4.irittAikliitr. :::.::,41;1/2.11g:fote;k:T44i40.(1.11:qvg'•'...,iIt;.1,r,. .-e;':.4i'i4:;r::','7 :::•4'11.74rfir...411:1;:.-'711,,,- .'''''l -4-- :,A... igitj:514::fiikl:?1,7A•j..:1::1•, ..ft...4 t:,0,,,,t;#141:17;-,.,..,,,4,-L1.41,-',. ;:...'\•Itt,11::;?.fi'-,., . -:-.. .- ,'4::';1;'-'-:: '•'*.-i'0•;;5.. -:'•':111:'....,•:.:'.7'.:',.,':...':',:. .1:•:::-.:'i'''.*:,fii., ::::iiz-ff4:Vga.;:le;...z.kli?-.,4:4-.:<,•,.61.:t::0*.is,'s z.;.-.,'', ''.. <•.'..' .k.: --..;:i....-ii'-•,,4:,-4-my*....,:-:-.k .....::::::<•,:-.:t...'..,.,_.;..-;:•, :':, ,•,-.•.:11*.•-ii,fil. .,...:, ....:1 : .;'$'4 .,:.:',f;:,:v.,.W.*:.1" .:.:!::.'.--,ii-::':',*--!I'•i.•-•-•;-?::-41,.- ) ;•.-:-..:;,.• ff•Y$:•'!:k 4-,,,,•$'k.§., ,-,-.1,,,,..;:::::3,,,,,,,- :<-.._:...,,.?7,:v„.:,:.,..•,,, :- :::::::::::,.•,:. --.. ..,;:"•::.M.(7?...:....,,.,...!...,.!...kft;i'., :,',..--:.%.,0:::...,-4A•4) Inthrillivil,'•:- 'kq:,:: :;,•;.t:.,7,:k: 4:.-:7.1..::.:k'...`.A;Ii.4:"Ig?..'-';:i:`.:;C:'...1:',ii;..4‘i".'. Iletiti;::_ifItil:t.;.-- --•',:iVt4....-4t4:41t;ft,', . .'!"::::::1: ::.- ):-.`.'...r:',.?‘,.r"j.',..,a,k'f,',14.kr41-....' s..-:*4::Mt-.;,-"li..!;:::et:'",':V_Ati: ::.glUct...i.e..,,,- :k.,:•;,......‘:;:?,,.)g;.f::m'I'....:',:. .::•'...:'4.-::.•..-•:',?.;::'.3::.:ij....,..4. ,:k41?-:'-'''.t .,',:,'.',".11-1!;:i•.',. :44li .....03.,.<f:•,,:e4i4:: ..,;:.,.'.:+.....'.:.:.....4....,;.:.;i:.-.:-.4.- :.,% .,,....?;,:.1a-1:,`:,<',.''-',..;',.;.:.,:;:-.'','1.. ,;.•10;k,f;.$.tiCti...':!4..:..lil:u.kti)4,j:ki! t10,4*:,,-. .--..... . ,i':;li41.;-4',` A,iiA14'.V ..',,'.....i...:t#ta''' -`i'...4.;.: -g.:Ai.leimoiAta.,:•; ,:.:.:0,7'.:.:.,gi.-,;,•.-j3,..§41,..'•,i.:.1:.;..i*Z.... .".=;.Q1,:e7...,-_.,:•.:>: ': '?;41131M.kilitbAN674.',,.:4.?R',14•41;5.,,,I-z:;;.:,:-.z..: 4:::,..,,,-,ia..:.9.F4$-:;_..4.111z,i.-tey,.::: t 1.1:444ittltilgi;.A...;,?›.',244.:::::-k!'"it:*tett f.,..-,,,15 .If.50.ti.::....z.7.'......-tilt),..1,..,.:::..-,:li. Mt.4--:,4:::;„:.,.....-is:;;•.4.71. ',..,..,4. 4i.:-1-0;,..„Tz,. :,... ::_tew.,1:---,;,.;:':.;-iiitilli„;,1,:.:4:ti-i:4,1 -5s -.. ; *s I ..,..:,.,.m::..A.,...:: .titoc43.::.-:,,,k,E.,-.,-,...,?-0.41,7„..44...41,k1:,,;.*.o.;.,-,.'440.if..;41:::::,'. --.,. ..41,:-..>,",.."?.,:,-.,:. 4.e.,. ,,,,,„:,:,4.7-,(..,i.::,‘,., .,-,,,,,,,,,, ,,..,,.1-,,,, :i;:t•*tktA*:fjtttt:(''*itt.'gpk";1*'c':› .,,:,-• ,:,:t.t,',44. .,,,',.t,..3,;?;:.?,,,:::..,,...,,, 4:,-...,.),•::''...::,'''''.: 4.•*i.. ',,,:':;.':..1 P,•ni.1•4.4,.. 1:4:7:4?•' l'-:1*10:kil>.W'... .4,*,,.....,'7:' i'Vt$0,VeSikf'..,:. '..'24::1.,.:1'47,•:'..'?,•''''.:7';:r.',.:: .. ',.. :.*14::;;;kfiiV:14:4*••'' 4.14*.:N• t4. .: .-;-:,; :-.:.;"...ii.;,,'-' :"<'1:i•:'''.;51,,,.:-Nta.,..4.4.,...;..Q. ;': 4:::•.:::1141:%Lti::::•,4U;:i3. :;4t4I\:'• .:'-' 'k'-',/0:-.'-:', - .: ..'."..v..'-:,,1::::,.,•,::.::''.::.::''<i: it.',...;:.....4.'''.. .134:':,t4A;13:V9i'd.. *til.'"Atti,1• :i:.i..5.1.:(1) ;:;':4:';.':';'27...-: ."'-'•;; .".,.-. :;•::..tii*'.:: ., 13511t).(r.iti ..C.*:',4:i;tj.7-/t."'S''''''t-is,7•::''''''i':9:: : ".:;,:':::; r. 4.•'.'ti.:.:;;'''4::ii : :21:: .:i_.; i -5.-: '--,..,•:i.:1:.. :..411:14.Y1. ::-.:"" ; '',...::::::;,:‘,...:.,....•;.5.k),.:•<,i;:•."::. :...,.,; .:::,! ...;::..-...'...-...:::'.',.S.L.'•.:., :,4'44:74,*4,-;:::?;-...- ,.: ..:,.'„--,-;.-:•;?..:; . ,•.:. :..?:. -.:, ,,,,,,,, ,,-::.• ,,,,,,,,.. :-..-: :.;...4..fitz!4:71T4--.:*- -;....::''. ;':..sti,':.m 4•„4: ..:.:vt.-.......?:..-.i•.:.f.;:iv-::......- ,-,':;„.;-*1-.,...);; .,AZ,.4'.;.4.A:--,:f:-,It-1/1'''.:" .:';.v...:,..::1;;I:te,;-,./ -----:2- . ,-..', L:-:•-. II ,,?'•; --....„. 7 fr __1&. laiimi* - .q1IMIIPIF 21 --6 ....,..„, A Stormwater Utility for Oro Valley? A Feasibility Assessment by: prepared P>z•'` Z,„YMIMMER `.�C,,,IEWAIM,o�i::f�?:�iiESZt:„W 3,f Eal!il JE FULLER HYDROOT d 6fOMOPPt O OGT, IliC in association with (!! 0 Curtis Lueck&Associates Stormwater is . . ... .. . . . . . imemanarmaammanammanausaimm • The wa to r (and mud) in your driveway... :._, ....,,,,:,t.,=-:-,...,.' ,:3fiu--- 7-777 P _ „,,,f,..."_--s,t -:,,,..-,...,„.-:-----„,..,,,. - _,__:::i4,f:::-:,--,=.!o gra ,. - 2f r# •'.err f s a�� i 3 �.: ,i ., -..:.m 14''''''''''' r t' '��'�'' 4'".s u Rte..,� ",T._.1�'3f.���",A`*.,K t7� �„�� )_ ' "' i'a'r". -,y.`.-ar :„3IS. "rY� c.c� i' �X f: -. . ..,,,,..z‘,..,.: � ��1_ „y�`$v°��j���'�� .kms,x n�,;,. � '� ``�a'.<..d,u.> �'����T�'<�ry;9 s1���� �'Y s�A 't?.'.'+Z� ,� , -:1-1:77, ;.: 1 C 4. ,yr : .. vital k +3•e£.t{�va...J.ny. ;;;-'..*-.e^ -y'." '�^�b��y� r�'^''s�`�yM2 y� a"'����.i'����'• �(,§�" Y y J '�S�•��x�r.��`'tti7�t .f�s+!b��.�,,:,,.•. -':','-'''''''';;':7:'''''''''. :M;,,,,16:::-•;',.' y...!it'' A -,,, 'V 3'�'-.,�{��'��r�n. `n Y. naZ+ w^S•` 'a n. �.cC Y -� s 4,S fisyy, .yi a �Y.��s _ f x'�`b l' 'r'3!S'X'7 :; S f �>.od h'��.nsri .c:.r i � �t+a cL�e'��'� b T`�"t�.3.c. xs�"�t'AG.t,s..._ ` .-+eC �y?Lti�`-,-'�. i�r�s r r �' aT f,�''� y'�'c� + t. �� ' , { 3^'Y�FK�. cCy .�L v.9�,1;S� � '_ u'�7x„+'ti` - �+i�` k y� . ya"�- 'j.�"'M.��(F 'y.�"g'�"'`g'-^zKs F'^¢'�S r�}d""L�C�? r'S'�` '3 l•`.,M1b rb*'1.`��f,��{/�1..�wYw.14.,�r�):i xaSF:14_*'1,4'k •, 4 . 1 • It's the road can'tget throu h.... y 9warsairawitww,„4„,,,, cs,„,,-...,.---,.....,- trAt, .' :,-;,:-„,:,,,.,,,,.,. _.,,--...„,-- ,, ,.‘ ' ou . . ......., . 5 asset S ,x E .r ' -Vii „ ..kf+'avx�KT —�. ,e$' • '. ntj A.y* iL-`+i 4'. c 47,1*- 'S`R«`� .,.._, 6 w..,--.',...4,7--. .—"a a1.1.".,i�sa r-, v'''l a".a-,7 �SE ,�`4 ..._•. E f G_S.RytV ,y '`\ - '-'----40-k -'• S T J. - � Y �F ...5,. Y �•fir- x 1 "may_ TAT''.e;--'' ,Sgv t='?. ,,,_,-„,:„.i,,,,,,,,,:-'• ` --,•-•,,,,,,,,•--",;,-".L.,..",,,,, ,..- , "` :: .. . Scw ^� '�`.1 x �` f_ SSI �..f• at y�t x .-' ,+a.Y :',yam'''-af• r0,'.� -.. .. _.:,.,,,,,;-_:7;--.--:..,-:',1:—:-: .. _ ... ,.._ people and■ It's apotential S, ,.property... hazard to 'MF r zv• FCsK- k t,a " L -. ,- K ; h •F ,a �'�`" . :h, " ..-. sem, .. n: .:;'4::::4--:-',,..5-,..c.;::::;,4.: r" r _-_..•_• :;=-1,,,,,4 vh ,,- ` d,—,-' ",, ,y , "te• kF w F it J ' r a.; X .yam "'y� - _ . r ���<. asx4fr '1'e.' _ s ;,.r^n r.� i"'7{np, S`� M..+: .:..'y.�' R'�/r..nAoti !/�R-p ".:-- .o :tfg '11t. '� `'�-;:t, �h..D�"a/.''',.,....;,--"'C''"�`�'. ".�:r.3Gvw'77".-.,-,;';':':—� ::-,77....:,-..%144,C.�,t �Y��"�'7� .T "tM �•'es�.. '..3,:a` ..'Y. r', " �t Y+ .:",�' �4..I"'.,--,1,4" w-,1,f++.y4. ah .e Mr'.'.Z`' ...,._ c. 41*: ..f ._.„.., s ' •^ i.7fe. +n ^'6-:6 i:;C,J �v '�� * '^,R- ten '"'d- ,,; .:rte R "'.'44-..7-...:,..;;;;;t'':‘'77,—,:;4' �``i i `�' , ..:- ",' y.-v- 14, . 2 'r.�r 4: .}' •`" �yy�k'4.,-,:. .Sax -'+S°tz . - . ,'-'4-: -f,,,‘:,,,,,,_":1 'may`[ �. "4�.�'' 'R` .. ��..,yr y :.�..a,'<..": ,-,..,,,;3„ :';;...„ 4s 7" r�� \xy,•64147,..s.,„ '... +�� yly+ 1 1,51. � , Y ..- - - �� ��; q Z� C ',• ,�.,7y,.t�,y w�r.,� `n. -,-,,,,,,,,i,-,,,,,,,,,,,-.4.,-:\ . } p,�_.. �! �7'tet a�i ar'• ..,,,..1-,-4.:{ - -..-- L"`.��'';'` s � �„„e ale. \ .£s 'Nom?G 2 ■ and what's left afterward... - .:',F7-- - -z,,,,RIETE-eilignatiimitir-f....,„.„._ . ,. -.„- -- -.,,,-,,,,,,„„..,,H,`-',4^-'''''.-".",,-..1,::.;ie.,-,-', .,,,,,....- n,' f' ia•*�'r""'".'• 1<,.�!. •, r+.'s t3' '7r:`:"�"°"t'r'- . ,�7z4 - _, may, r .',T , yL." ' -:n��� `,z;.1� e' '" -. k , Wem4...a a fia.. A'a qnv�Y-. -aK'1F r. , { � qc T.-, �a 4;;.- � s � "c ` r; � r�"'. , "ir" •"ts:"xat,-., rro-- +r aratea:'4„a�t"*�r>".-Cv'a✓s'2`Y6�"S�'yficn 9r-yN,+>'rex, ;,ptiw.r..•ay,w°D`-vet .tfy�Y.'_.3�G?-J"y'.t' ,. �. •-..0 5�}.. "^v ca fi b'.4y���.Jl , e f�Qs8�.•�"`'�Yyy" qC. . •c ".-• � x.•"3 .q •'� 's " ,•W�..,: � 1 1 dti�Y "5.._ � ro, .-+y � r r-� xa "fi, .'4i�-w;tV ." nt, -,, . l�i h (�+�'Lr y Nry..,u, 0 � i�'- y -. ,,r!+� q4�.,z+ y� a ��i�'..! 5. „C�4 r- t ,� �mss3..+° ,.:,�..� 4-�� y4 �7.Y`c� iF'uw '� ,4� �t ��R r t 1„ � . r4,2--- ' { ,,AyZ mafs i w,,,, Qi ,r ° --A rf s� �r -. ?.«�4 - <n� rSx , `5,M . �v� p-` , � arF; � F� : r.YyQtF�. +' ' AtT'. -.;LF ,'z -.7'.;,,;.;‘,:.,,,,,i,.,,,-":',-1::,:::,A `" r` '�;1w ..-,,,,-,---,-----------.e:,-, vsS , t 4,..7 7:-...„,--7.4 : , i r.),av , - -+-'ar- ! ,_ '",.., � 0 \ "S� •fi� vi"" iro7 ' * �r Z`' `Aro�. .� t ,. `aPyZ�• � '�. r . -.',.,,t1;!:-', ..,,.07,k-V7.---'.4:;',;;'--1- ti1!- .�, 7. �`',n� F' ;,�is', � ..7' F7'--�� A� v�'!.4Z1‘:' ,1:i�1:.e� tt�wm�71x. 7.40.,,,:-'.-dr.,: �a y zs drt :'*z a ce,• '< T .ea• x • ,-oA.�1.� �•>s:, -:•::‘,E-2,-` 'H',y, '. ,•u,•P t `'"�.;'64,---',0:',. 0 S`„SFr '�` _T. e ~ :74,' a 4 •_ r` .-,.,'.1.,...- .c,'. 4-c ems'#, ':...r a , 'i . ., ,- - .•"g. , :. a' , i' ■ ....or what's not left.... 4 11?t - _ems.,' ,_ .. ,_ ,,,,,, ,:,,,,,-.,,,,,,,,,:„,..c.,,,,...„.„,...„...........,,--^M" .,ill .- r. , Lyam,^f• ---7,;'";-..- .,�., �-iarr.. ,�`y.°F,..��`.F, .� ..•mac a ..,� _� ^: � ' ks .n }re.' _ A.`^.ay. .$yam."' :eo c .,�.-� .w, 4.d.* .".�^s, �iw �� air �<-� r te�_sti S,�.g�,,, ,,3 � st ' " +• a' "' �, n.fie:r _�,�.� •,::. `Z i _ �--K, 5'r y%„ry c �N,t..+�SL. -.r• ..\� siIf°':-..�..t•.A,..; %, .__ !aL - �� , s. .,,.,;.,400,0z,.- sa rr` i. p;.; „. , x`..A z ,.: ..... :' 4r\'” * :« 7 , � ,=.T !',+��ti$ �Gim- f vt } f* A4 ,� ", �` ' 4 - _ ,, .n%t *tt,t,,�p- " ?„�C' .d[, 3 - ,.,',._,,,,,:a,. X _ ? �' P1rcs- ,� r frci . °1*. y _ rir ' '�' t�+ #D :i4 1, _c Yt y 4 r�, �: rFfii>� ^---,,;'.f--.-.:,. .7 . ,.qNC *t l” r �Y �'7 �r ' i+''.sB'� g�„, ya aw w,� . @rxw; k ' � " 5a 4. `r t . .., y� •e' ,n„ r .7, ! i � .O� X*, r ^X; 'NX a -c , s ,;' ' , �' Y�1 `. T -Y'z,1 S5�N'r,12 �,, _,"rc � yi -.':.-„--.-',2,:.,...--",-,,-::-▪t .i`sµ0�k��.3t,4�� 14w % :dd,��1 �'N� �'�� �����3. i « 14Aa: i �' � ,'.4M(. °s, +�a1n�:!-I � 5 °a 1" - i,*-syi?'��ySi,loe: y• ,Nt3e " •Fts}, YVZ, .-.:,..,,,4,-<-Y ,,, ; twwpib. 0 q`"?r sem. '71, t � �: :Y::'�y4h,;tx'�,a,is�� ~ * /b::p,5i3 � v 5 a - 4ti, .� "•an'i,d Y �£tr iak-0ah } a. k", ,,ru, ,v-.. + .::r: eK Yi'far.c~ ' «` ;,c,., ,,...h_ 3 Management isStormwater 1-11-Erlitirrirtri erts storm drains and other improvements , .. _, , .._ . ._ ._::.: ., .______7____.. ...„....,..„-c„,,,,,,.- , ,_,,,,,----.....--- ..-., -._ .„.„.._.- ., _.....„___- • ..... ..•41,,,-4A:::-. .-,,---. . :_.,,,,,,t,,,,,,,.:. -,---.-. .-..:,-.......,-,-,:p6-1,-,E.-':-,----. ._ .- ,:.-..--,-.1::-.D.,---- ,..„ . :- ., :,..__.„, . ,-...... . :-.-..,,...„ .,/ . .,,,..,- --.-„,...::,, . - T :::::::::„.„, -. -, •,t1,0,'44,144,1041-0:7-', • , „,".,-.,.,---t.i ...,,_ _•,,,v-,-,,,,,-2,,,,,,st',:,:,-,. _ / ..27f.'.44-,:-.;., `u. 9Mw , i • ,.. %�r - • �'\. ".,4-,s� ,00 `,, it, fiJ.. • g � F. I/4y-, / ki0- .. a ' ts /+ L; ?. k ,., z r lfti�'se'�r -;'•:,.."."4-'i:,..," 7.•••;-,170-'-',,,..:•-7. 5 y.wA ..��1��. .,d..s * ,#/�,j;,��,��r�� y--tR�k� -yip}.S ; �,�x.<"1_k'��-�£:, 4 t. i y�a x antes s�d;n4A� �F b tib[ t4v ti rr Yal i ;.K...c, ;�-+i:•,x.. `..'.ate...>-. &&�� ■ Its controlling runoff... --,,,,,,,,,-__,---p,-..- ..,,4' ti • , yam. • ,. , ,y,,,,, • s Pays -- 5 '-lit •- - F - -� -7:_,-,,i., -,,i.., a -,,,,i.,4-43. , ..-.;:"'.,:f.0-.',7-- �i -M'R" tw �ef._' $arc . . FF! i .-ice , • -• 5. y'y • fCT.• om'&'Sj.� A L ty� J `3�.al. - 4 • -a aq.: TM`bY..4 QTS` ^l'4(w *.:4144X:',,:,,..1...- x *•'-'''''': � - ... --,,,,--,,,i4...,..,...,„.;..-.-...:.-_:.-..,_y6s -' p � 7e C i '-.4.--' .,..-_—.A.I,:7-,.-k-,,,,,, It c '`.. '• R`Js..... { x ,...,..-••,..,,,i,,,,--,-.,,..7,?-,..,---,,,...:-:.. k . -., i4 :„.' Ft4'"+. hyi` ^�Ny c �.5. '.if4!: qFt' . ..-.wy'Cx 4 infopublic rmation and ■ And providing education to the .... ¢ 4 •`l''' t m may, -7 $. �,tr{h'•se y'ay,'.a•`�"�'':".si.F43?-� 1 , r:K „Ali ` _ r -1‘,' • !_;-:4:14**tb,": 1 rYfi� r quality?And what about stormwater ■ Residential runoff can contain chemicals from fertilizers, pesticides and other sources, ■ Parkinglot runoff can contain greases and oils, ■ Industrial runoff can include hazardous waste and heavy metals, ■ Thispolluted runoff ends u p in washes and rivers, ■ Polluted waterwa scan affect plants and animals y and groundwater quality, 5 Stormwater Regulations ■ The Clean Water Act addresses water quality problems from urban runoff, ■ The National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) was recently revised, ■ The new regulations (NPDES Phase II) cover the Town of Oro Valley. What do the NPDES Phase II regulations require? ■ NPDES Phase II requires the Town to develop a stormwater management program to reduce pollutants entering washes and streams, ■ The Town must submit its stormwater management plan by the Year 2003 to be covered under NPDES Phase II. 6 What's required by NPDES for stormwater management? ■ Public education and outreach, ■ Public involvement in development of the stormwater management plan, ■ Monitoring of the Town's stormwater system to detect and eliminate illegal discharge of polluted runoff, ■ Control of runoff during construction, ■ Control of runoff after construction, ■ Management of municipal facilities to reduce polluted runoff, What does the Town have now? --------. ■ The Town currently administers a floodplain ordinance which protects homes and businesses against flooding, ■ The floodplain ordinance does not address stormwater quality, ■ The Town does not address many NPDES Phase II requirements discussed herein. a The Town does not have a dedicated funding source for construction, management and regulation of its stormwater system. What does the Town need? ■ The Town needs to develop a stormwater program which meets NPDES Phase II requirements, ■ Ordinances, regulations, public participation and infrastructure improvements, ■ The Town needs a source of funding for the stormwater program, ■ Some of the Town's needs will be addressed by the ongoing Town Wide Drainage Study, What are the benefits? ■ Better public understanding of the hazards of polluting stormwater, ■ Cleaner water in the Town's neighborhoods, streets and streams, ■ Less silt and sand in Town streets, ■ Planning for needed stormwater improvements, ■ Better performance of existing infrastructure through proper maintenance. 8 What are the costs? ■ Staffing, construction, maintenance, administration and public awareness are all cost components, ■ A recent survey of communities with stormwater programs indicated per capita costs ranging from $0.03 to $26.00, ■ EPA estimates a total annual per household cost of $9.16 to meet NPDES Phase II requirements. Some Funding Options ■ General fund, ■ New taxes, ■ Developer fees, ■ Improvement Districts, ■ IGAs with other agencies, ■ Grants & Loans, ■ Utility fees 9 Which is best? ■ Reliance on general fund spreads already thin resources, ■ New taxes are unpopular and don't relate cost to service, ■ Developer fees only address new construction, ■ Improvement Districts are site specific and don't address community wide program needs, ■ Reliance on IGAs, other agency funding or grants & loans is uncertain and unpredictable in the future, What about a Stormwater Utility ? ■ User fees are equitable since all property contibutes to stormwater runoff, ■ Utility fees are reliable as a dedicated funding source, ■ A defensible rate structure is critical, ■ The legal basis needs to be evaluated and established by statute. 10 What would stormwater utility fees be like? ■ Fees should be based on contribution ■ Fees should be affected by area and use of property, ■ Typically such fees are based on a fee per unit of contribution, such as square foot of runoff producing area, ■ The fee can be tied to past or projected costs of drainage infrastructure. The Next Steps. . . ■ Determine if legal basis for utility exists, ■ If one does not, what would be needed? ■ If legally feasible, evaluate possible rate structure, ■ Estimates of program cost requirements can be included in the ongoing Town Wide Drainage Study. 1l