Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPackets - Council Packets (1484) TONIGHT ' S STUDY SESSION (April 12t'') HAS BEEN CANCELLED DUE TO A LACK OF QUORUM THANK YOU ! AGENDA ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL STUDY SESSION APRIL 12, 2000 ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11,000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE STUDY SESSION CALL TO ORDER — AT OR AFTER 7:00 P.M. ROLL CALL 1. Town-wide Drainage and Stormwater Program and Fee Concept Proposal — Discussion 2. Oro Valley Orthophotography Presentation - "A Snapshot of Today for a Vision of Tomorrow." ADJOURNMENT The Town of Oro Valley complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If any person with a disability needs any type of accommodation, please notify the Oro Valley Town Clerk at 297-2591. POSTED: 4/7/00 4:30 p.m. LH .1 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION STUDY SESSION DATE: April 12, 2000 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: William A. Jansen, P.E., Town Engineer SUBJECT: Review and recommendations concerning the establishment of a Stormwater Management Utility Summary: Since the incorporation of the Town of Oro Valley in 1974, the Town has not had a specific program to deal with the many issues associated with stormwater and associated flooding. The continued growth of the Town has compounded the problems associated with stormwater. In recognition of this issue, the Town has embarked on a town-wide drainage basin study to establish a stormwater management program and identify steps that need to be taken to reduce the adverse impacts of stormwater on the citizens and their property. The Town of Oro Valley must comply with the Phase II requirements of the Federal Clean water Act through the EPA managed National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). This is an un-funded federal mandate that requires the Town to establish a stormwater/pollution management and reduction program by 2003. The NPDES program requires the Town to initiate and/or follow the requirements of the NPDES program. The cost to implement the NPDES program is estimated to be in excess of $200,000.00 and it will have an estimated annual program operating cost in excess of$150,000.00 per year. At present, the Town does not have a funding source outside of the general fund to fund the NPDES program or any town-wide drainage improvement program. The concept of a stormwater utility has been used by many communities throughout the United States to fund their stormwater management program and institute their NPDES program. The Department of Public Works will present the stormwater utility concept to the Mayor and Council for their consideration. Attachment: 1. Preliminary Stormwater Utility Feasibility Study It; De , .fent Head T/` Town Manager TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PRELIMINARY STORMWATER UTILITY FEASIBILITY STUDY Prepared for: The Town of Oro Valley Public Works Department 680 W. Calle Concordia Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 Prepared by: IlEFULLERo O enc. In Association with: tr\\_. Curtis Lueck &Associates And Frank Cassidy, Attorney-at-Law March 2000 Town of Oro Valley Preliminary Stormwater Utility Feasibility Assessment Page ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction/Overview 1 Stormwater Management 2 How much stormwater? 2 What kind of stormwater? 2 Level of Service 2 The Town Wide Drainage Study 2 NPDES Phase II Regulations 3 Requirements 3 Permitting Deadline and Approval 4 Penalties 4 Regional NPDES Programs 5 Benefits to Public 5 Costs 6 Funding 6 Funding Source Evaluation Matrix 7 Stormwater Utility 10 Legal Basis 10 Structure 10 References 12 Attachments 12 Town of Oro Valley Preliminary Stormwater Utility Feasibility Assessment Page 1 Introduction/Overview The Town of Oro Valley was incorporated in 1974. At that time the City was a community of less than 2,000 people. By 1997, the Town's population had grown to over 20,000. With that increase in population has come homes and businesses that increase the amount and quality of runoff across yards and into roads and drainageways. The Town has historically dealt with larger flooding issues, such as flooding along the Canada del Oro Wash, on an as-needed basis. However, local drainage concerns have gone largely unaddressed, as the town has experienced its rapid growth during the last 25 years. Today, there are hundreds of homes and businesses located along natural and improved drainageways in the Town. Many of these drainageways were built before there were standards for drainage. Many are also privately owned and not within the jurisdiction of the Town to enter and maintain when needed. As development occurs, runoff from paved and other impervious areas increases, causing ponds and areas of flowing water where little or none had occurred in the past. This can create problems ranging from the nuisance category, like getting out of your car after a rain storm in a parking lot with six inches of standing water, to real hazards to health, such as getting ones car caught in a swiftly flowing roadway crossing and being swept off the road. To compound the problem, decreasing stormwater quality has been identified as a pervasive national problem by the federal government through its National Pollution Discharge Elimination System(NPDES). The NPDES program prescribes programs and regulations that communities in certain urban areas must meet to improve stormwater quality and reduce the degradation of the nation's waterways. The result of the above happenings has been the development of a system of stormwater infrastructure that has gone largely unattended and unaccounted for in the development of the Town. The Town has historically been unable to address the growing problems associated with this system due to a lack of dedicated funding and manpower to deal with the system. This condition is expected to worsen with the recent inclusion of the Town in a listing prepared by the Environmental Protection Agency of communities required to meet the requirements of the recent NPDES program Phase II requirements. Town of Oro Valley Preliminary Stormwater Utility Feasibility Assessment Page 2 Stormwater Management What is stormwater management? Simply put, stormwater management is the program that a community uses to insure that the storm runoff from urban areas is treated and conveyed so as to protect the safety,property and convenience of its residents and the quality of the stream environment that the runoff drains into. Although such a program may seem simple at first glance,there are many aspects of providing adequate provision for stormwater that can become complicated and costly. The following paragraphs discuss some issues for consideration. How much stormwater? A community needs to have a method of determining how much stormwater runoff will occur during different types of storms. This process involves scientific and engineering measurements and calculations by professionals trained in the field of hydrology. What kind of stormwater? As a community develops it may see all types of land surfaces that affect water quality such as pavement, landscaping and even grass lawns. In addition, different commercial and industrial land uses can generate pollutants such as oils, greases, solvents and heavy metals that can find their way into storm drains. The community needs to consider the type of water quality it wants to have within its streams and washes and develop technical standards and requirements to insure that level of quality. Level of Service What kind of protection from stormwater does the community want? Do the residents want protection from only the most hazardous floods that happen during the most rare of rain storms? Or do the residents expect protection from the inconvenience of the typical summer thunderstorm? Or is the expectation somewhere in between. Do the residents expect all stormwater to be drained into defined washes and drainageways? Or can the residents tolerate some drainage being run within streets and parking areas? Is an increase in the amount and frequency of runoff acceptable? Or do the residents want regulations to limit the discharge of runoff from new development? A good stormwater management program identifies the level of service to be provided through control of stormwater runoff, its quantity and quality. The Town Wide Drainage Study Currently, the Town is attempting to answer many of the questions posed above through a comprehensive study of the Town's drainage basins, existing drainage improvements, and assessment of future needs. The Town has retained the services of a professional consulting firm to perform the study.' 1 The Town Council approved a contract with Kimley-Horn Associates in March 2000. The work is expected to take a year to complete. Town of Oro Valley Preliminary Stormwater Utility Feasibility Assessment Page 3 NPDES Phase II Regulations The National Pollution Discharge Elimination System, or NPDES, program was first developed in 1972 as the fundamental regulatory mechanism of the Clean Water Act(CWA). The NPDES program is administered by the Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) and requires anyone discharging from a point source (e.g., a single commercial or industrial operation) into "waters of the United States"to obtain an NPDES permit. It is important to understand this latter term as it is often confused with the more intuitive understanding of flowing rivers and streams. The Clean Water Act defines"waters of the United States" as surface waters, including streams, streambeds, rivers, lakes, reservoirs, arroyos, washes, and other ephemeral watercourses and wetlands. The federal government has generally interpreted this definition to include almost any ground feature that might occasionally convey runoff in response to rainfall. The initial focus of the NPDES program was on industrial and municipal wastewater. However, the federal government believes that several studies have shown that pollution from diffuse sources is now the leading cause of water quality impairment. Diffuse sources are those that cannot be isolated at a particular location like a gas station or manufacturing plant. Such "diffuse" sources include urban areas (such as housing and commercial developments), agricultural areas, construction sites and mining operations among others. As a result, the 1987 amendments to the CWA added Section 402(p), which required the EPA to develop a comprehensive phased program to regulate stormwater discharges under the NPDES program. The program was to include provision for regulating flows from municipal storm sewer systems such as those found in most cities and towns throughout the country used to drain streets and neighborhoods. Such"municipal separate storm sewer systems" are referred to as MS4s by the EPA. The initial phase of the program developed by EPA in response to CWA Section 402(p) was aimed at larger municipalities serving populations of 100,000 or more and was implemented in 1990. However, as of December 1999, the second phase (Phase II) became effective. The Phase II regulations cover municipalities serving populations of less than 100,000, which are located within"urban" areas. The EPA defines urban areas as defined areas with populations of 50,000 or more. Thus the Phase II regulations cover the Town of Oro Valley by virtue of its location within the Eastern Pima County urban area. The Town's storm sewer system is referred to as a"small MS4"by the EPA. Requirements The NPDES Phase II regulations call for small MS4s to implement a program that will provide the following "minimum control measures" (EPA's term): 1. Public Education and Outreach on Stormwater Impacts 2. Public Involvement and Participation 3. Monitoring and Prevention of Illicit Discharges to the Stormwater System 4. Control of Construction Site Stormwater Runoff Town of Oro Valley Preliminary Stormwater Utility Feasibility Assessment Page 4 5. Management of Post-Construction Stormwater Management in New Development and Redevelopment 6. Implementation of Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping Practices for Municipal Operations Additional information regarding program requirements under each of the above categories is provided in Appendix A of this document. In addition to developing a program that includes the above components,the community must develop a series of measurable goals for each of the above controls. Examples of such measurable goals include: • Inspecting or repairing a certain number of drain inlets each year; • Conducting street-sweeping operations a certain number of times each year; • Surveying all municipal rights-of-ways to identify illicit discharges; • Conducting a certain number of training classes for municipal operations each year; • Soliciting the help of a certain number of volunteers each year to perform water quality monitoring or education/outreach activities; or • Reducing sediment loading. Permitting Deadline and Approval The deadline for small MS4s, including the Town of Oro Valley, to make application to the EPA for their NPDES Phase II permits is December 2003. By that time, the Town must have submitted a Notice of Intent (NOI)to be covered under the NPDES Phase II program. The NOI must include a description of: • The Best Management Practices (BMPs)that will be implemented. BMPs are schedules of activities, prohibitions of practices, maintenance procedures and other management techniques used to implement the "minimum control measures" described above; • The measurable goals used to determine achievement of the minimum control measures; • The month and year in which each BMP will be started and completed, or the frequency of action if it is ongoing; and • The person(s)responsible for implementing or coordinating the stormwater management program. The Town will be covered under a general NPDES permit within 48 hours of submittal of the NOI and will be notified by mail of its permit number. If, for some reason, the NOI is not adequate, the Town will hear from the EPA. Penalties NPDES Permits are federally enforceable. Violators may be subject to the enforcement actions and penalties described in Clean Water Act sections 309(b), (c), and (g) and 505. The cited references call for fines of up to $25,000 per day for knowing violations of the regulations, with higher fines for repeat violations. Town of Oro Valley Preliminary Stormwater Utility Feasibility Assessment I Page 5 Regional NPDES Programs The urbanized area of Pima County directly surrounding the City of Tucson, as well as the City itself, are both required to apply for NPDES municipal stormwater discharge permits. In order to assure that the quality of stormwater discharges from its municipal storm sewer system is managed to the maximum extent practicable, Pima County has developed a Stormwater Management Program that includes best management practices, public education and stormwater monitoring. The major components of Pima County's Stormwater Management Program include2: Monitoring for Illicit Connections and Illegal Dumping: Pima County's storm drain system includes roadways, pipes and constructed channels. Pima County monitors discharges from its storm drain system both during dry weather and during storms. It is illegal to dump waste into the storm drain system. If an inappropriate or illegal discharge is detected, the flow is traced back to its source so that the discharge can be eliminated in the future. Stormwater Discharges Associated with Industrial Activity: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency requires a select group of industrial facilities to secure NPDES stormwater discharge permits. Pima County is developing an industrial facility database and inspection program to assist the industrial community in achieving compliance with federal requirements. Stormwater Discharges Associated with Construction Sites: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency requires all construction sites over five acres in size to secure a stormwater discharge permit. Pima County is developing an inspection program to assist construction site operators in achieving compliance with federal regulations. Stormwater Assistance Program: Pima County is developing a Stormwater Assistance Program as an extension of its existing Business Assistance Program. The Stormwater Assistance Program will assist businesses and persons in their efforts to comply with NPDES stormwater regulations and will educate citizens about stormwater runoff and associated concerns. Benefits to Public The benefits of the NPDES program include: • Better public understanding of the stormwater system in their area and the hazards of discharging polluted waters into it; • Cleaner water in the Town's streets, drainageways and streams; • Less silt and sediment deposited in roadways and drainageways; • Development of a database on infrastructure improvement and maintenance needs; and • Better performance of well maintained infrastructure; and • Compliance with the NPDES Phase II regulations and avoidance of penalties. 2 From Pima County Department of Environmental Quality(PCDEQ)web site: http://wwvv.deq.co.pima.az.us/h2oinfo/stormli2oistorm.htm Town of Oro Valley Preliminary Stormwater Utility Feasibility Assessment I Page 6 Costs The costs of a stormwater management program to meet NPDES requirements are not easily determined. However, a good deal of research has been done on the cost incurred by communities that have already implemented NPDES stormwater programs. The following paragraphs discuss some of the different cost components of the program. Manpower: Staff is needed to provide public outreach, inspection, maintenance, regulatory and administrative functions. Capital and Equipment: On occasion NPDES compliance requires construction of improvements to control the quantity and quality of runoff. Such improvements can include grass lining of channels, detention ponds, stormwater filtration basins and systems. Equipment needs can include street sweepers, water quality monitoring equipment and stations. Maintenance &Inspection: An important part of a stormwater program is the need to inspect and maintain the infrastructure of channels, roadways, storm drains, basins, etc. These facilities need to be inspected and maintained on a regular basis. Inspections are also needed of private construction projects to insure that NPDES requirements are being met. Administration: A stormwater program requires administration just like any other regulatory program. Permitting, inspection, maintenance and construction all need planning, coordination and financing administration. Public Awareness: Public awareness costs can include public meeting set ups, flyers, staff time for meetings and production of educational materials such as videos, poster boards, etc. The resulting costs of all these components can add up. In addition, private sector costs are incurred to meet regulatory requirements. A July 1999 survey of communities already administering stormwater programs indicated annual per capita costs for stormwater management ranging from a low of $0.03 to a high of $26.00, with an average annual per capita cost of$2.76 for those communities responding to the survey3. Utilitizing information from the above survey,the EPA estimated a total annual per household cost of$9.16 for those communities automatically designated to meet the requirements of the NPDES Phase II regulations. Funding There are a number of different ways in which a stormwater management program can be funded. The matrix on the following pages provides a summary of the various funding options and their advantages and disadvantages by different evaluation criteria with comments on each option relative to their applicability to Arizona and the Town. 3 Survey of Stormwater Phase II Communities,National Flood and Stormwater Management Agencies(NAFSMA), July 1999 '-11R 'V '.11 '-il0 ^ der rn (4 .71d ci) oil CD S ° CD h.-4 (4.,i5 8 --•• 0 .4 15, A, ,.. a,, cn m, C P. 0CD .4. �- C 8 fa q CO a o g V) o 0 b • it ' OO 44 r,cDKp - - � o " -:2 o , CDa co • eD .- 0 0 r-* p CD 0 ►-'- cn C) O 0 ~' ''� n� ° 0p crow 0 rp0 � 0g 2 o . a " s Ito 111 n1 o o L to `� O Cti CA 0 Ind 25 4 ' > ,„ ..,_, . ,,, a ,,,..., v, . c., ,.< til z . 0 cDF2t K cnaz *1 133 ,c't 0 t � S C- ~' ' ..CD pnU ► OCD rtti OQ �' CD..t ¢' UQ Cp' O CD A) Ac' CD 0 .0 �-* OCA v, �... 0. O 0 �'Cn is N. CD' p 0• Q Z O CD 0 O g 11, �' a• 0 1 00 �n CA 0 A� 1. _ • ZS' ,. v' ph) .: :-.. ► ►--' 0), to ., - ►-r, co < 0 C sr‘7 C 0 ,-, t S1' O 0 CD 0 EA CO 9,3",...`")- PD ' cil q n 0 0 " it ril Z 777' g A r E. 70c- 0 0 CA a A Ca.CAI ta, CD 0553 53 wpn 8 v' ¢' 0' 0 0 CM 0 — r,- 0 ' & ° O O 0 Gn sz > „ � 4 ra4 � 4o800' d COQ O 0 0 o a' o ° cw r ICI 0 O a*zi - ..., n b 0 c r go o o .-) n O O > O 0-+1 )8+) n t an 0 n o 0' n n 70 cC � e A . CDSf�0 • � : ,4 a a. �° 0 0.. p, 0 a 4 Cl) GQ 0 t. ..• Sy p e '-o 6 � Q, Z '� to a ►-3 a Z 8 5- R• a CA � d A .. 0,.ct b Cep cD �. O O a p 0 `9 CD ¢, ..; 0 0.. C p. � O ~ O c• � 0. a o. o• L'• a a: c-,- w a ,.... CD 's a, �. o a ,, • ...• A) ,-,• .• ,.... fts 0 0 4. ¢' 0..' 0CT' 0 O 0 O (10 • Cp .t p. ,5 0 0 0 n A CD u CD �O O zO ad � PD P rt 8 zO ad 4%. a. a Z n O' a Z OO' n 4. �d 0 ?<.►,� ,d 5 — p �. O O .1 Dv K 0 I1 11 "Cs 0 E. tJ e+,-.• " v) N t.-.... g 6-- ;5,--: 5, p.,_ . 6-- 0 „s gCA • a�`C dq v� O O O et) ft CD dM CD cD eD .• p, a 'TJ 0-3 r o d C4 b d n o '•11 CA oil x 6- r,.... 8 0 CD 0 ‘•C CD CA P 0 (7' a n P n CA CD (7 8* rs-•' En O co ag g p CD gni `,..t' CD '', -. CD q n . n 0' 0 o O A) �-.• -h CD C ,-t O CCD CD CP CD o (n O n O c) CL ` O 8. O 4, -• ... 0 i" ,-+, 0 C , P O -• .4 5 g 14 :=,- czi., 0 0, ci-.,,• • F. 4 w 5 0 'A rj) a g — 9., .e7.'":: 5- 5' PD g+, ,7 0 .-- gs ''-3 CD . O [� U' `C 0 `, O O R. r+ 0 0 '5 C `� tin' " p gas 6 0 P C"). Crq ° '"' r T CDCL E w CD a CD aQ �. r' `o H w 0 0 En '' C1Q- CDD O `C r CD g 0 7d Z ca. O ►y 0 7d O 't, O Z --4,1,) C CD CD 1 P Cl. CD UI.6 FT O' o ,S n 00 "r: q . o v1 gt. O 5 CD 0.0 0 0 �' .11 o �' m 0 a.. CD 0 ti. CD CD .0I a -7:3 CD P-7:3e'D t o 2 N• 2 O. t 6 ,.... a p t , es- tZ' 0 cf.2. P• P Ft. 5- ai• 0 fY N ft tg 6' '-ca a '"L. - q � 0 CD b 0 y a• o or tj ''� E 7• D) A) C7 a O �s o 5 n C� 3 > O+ V C) 5 n n 7d a' O ¢ oOrD 0oa+ o � .8 _ R. ►� � 0 ,� CDc .800 ' -, , mr� . ►1: 0 '�3 qg g CD — O -• C 0 O 0' :-.4-i• 2., �. CD ' r' w OtiDO et) cl 0 0 0 7 g 0 — ca. Fb-q ,, ,„ — r„ 0 cr 0 r. ,_,. 0 .. = o o 0 ag a05 5- a- , a ¢. . S.k `C ,tr E) P V`� CDo � d � � o � oo � '� • CLI � dd tioc • ca, C� to,8- P g 00 2 fa, p ,7). a: ,E st, a „, 52 CD md. f'D clqp D 4o COO a' ... •.! „ p,o• ct, vv ►-t O � . apa 6+ g 0 o , O co h• h. a0 o o d o p. do Pa IC) co ad � '�a o ` ,. O �' ,, O �-.. 0. d 9" ( �. t1 g- , or CD o o, t� '-� -,E 2 O s 4a � r" � 0 �• t� oa Ott al C' Cl) tri 2 C &I �' S <-p- .-4 0 ,--,g � o- 0 g CAOci) Qc40cnOeDge3 it o o � n 5• � a tomel�� or Cl) `� $ g' F q Q° D 6 Town of Oro Valley Preliminary Stormwater Utility Feasibility Assessment Page 9 Based on preliminary assessment of the possible alternatives,this feasibility assessment was focused on the development of a stormwater utility. This option was selected because of the inherent equity of the distribution of costs to all residents of the community. The stormwater utility concept is discussed further in the following section. Town of Oro Valley Preliminary Stormwater Utility Feasibility Assessment Page 10 Stormwater Utility Many communities develop stormwater utilities to create a dedicated and reliable funding mechanism for their stormwater management program. State enabling legislation is often required, and local implementation ordinances will be needed as well. The basic philosophy behind the utility fee is that "users" should pay for the stormwater program to the extent that they contribute to the problem. The term"users," in this case, includes property owners, particularly, property owners that have impervious surfaces on their property. This approach is equitable because it charges a fee for the service of stormwater management (rather than a tax) and because all property contributes to runoff. Legal Basis One of the first issues to address in the feasibility of the Stormwater Utility concept is whether or not a sufficient legal basis exists for its implementation. Currently, Arizona Revised Statutes(ARS) Title 9, Chapter 5, Part 9-521, "Definitions", defines"utility undertaking"to include stormwater. This chapter addresses the use of municipal bonds for financing utilities and, under Part 9-530, "Service charges;taxation and budgeting; computation," states that "the governing body of the municipality issuing the bonds shall prescribe service charges, and shall revise them when necessary, so that a utility undertaking for which the bonds were issued shall always remain self supporting..." This section also states that the service charges shall generate sufficient revenue to pay all bonds and associated expenses when due,provide for all expenses of operation, maintenance, expansion, and replacement of facilities and to provide reasonable reserves for such purposes. The legal requirements for implementation of a stormwater utility will require further research before serious development of the concept can begin. Structure The stormwater utility can be structured to assess costs by different land use designations and their relative contribution to the amount and quality of runoff and the associated need for stormwater management. Most stormwater utilities charge either a monthly or annual fee based upon the amount of impervious area on the property. Commonly, a necessary annual revenue base for operation of the utility is determined. That revenue base is then divided by a number representing a rough estimate of the amount of impervious surface being served by the estimated annual revenue base6. A base rate can then be developed based on the $/impervious unit. This base rate can then be converted into monthly or annual service fees for different land use categories(residential, commercial, industrial, etc.) 5 This would include amortization of up front capital costs as well as annual operation and maintenance costs. Such an estimate could be incorporated into the ongoing Town Wide Drainage Study. 6 Such an estimate can be done by assuming certain percentages of impervious cover for different land use categories. Town of Oro Valley Preliminary Stormwater Utility Feasibility Assessment Page 11 based on the number of impervious units for each land use category. The example below illustrates the concept. Hypothetical Example: It may be determined that a total annual revenue base of $100,000 is needed to operate the stormwater utility. It may also be determined that the current impervious coverage in the service area is 100,000,000 square feet. Thus the annual base rate to operate the stormwater utility is $100,000 divided by 100,000,000 square feet or$0.001 per square foot impervious cover. It is then determined, as part of this example, that a typical medium density residential area is 40% impervious, while commercial developments are 80% impervious and industrial developments are 90% impervious. As a result the following service fee rates could be developed: Med. Residential = $0.001 x 0.40 x lot area(sq. ft.) (e.g., $8.71/year for a half acre lot) Commercial = $0.001 x 0.80 x lot area(sq. ft.) (e.g., $34.85/year for a one acre lot) Industrial = $0.001 x 0.90 x lot area(sq. ft.) (e.g., $39.20/year for a one acre lot) The concept can then be extended to other land use categories based either on general categories of impervious cover or by actual measurement of impervious cover. Keep in mind that the above illustration is only one of many ways in which a fee structure could be determined. However, generally speaking the rate should be based on the degree to which property contributes to runoff and, by extension, the cost of providing stormwater management services. Also, some stormwater utilities only charge if there is impervious surface on the property. Others charge all landowners, however if there is no development on the property the rate is typically lower than that charged for developed property. Some communities are evaluating adding a water quality component to their utility fee rate formula. This quality factor would allow communities to have user pay for not only the quantity of stormwater that they contribute, but also the quality. Because a utility charges a user fee, not a tax, schools and churches typically are not exempted from paying the fee. Some stormwater utilities receive additional funding from developers' fees and permit application fees. The manner in which the service fee is assessed is also important. The service fee can be incorporated into an existing billing structure, such as the Town's water billing. Or the service fee could be billed separately. The cost of implementing the billing structure should be considered in the overall cost of the stormwater program. Town of Oro Valley Preliminary Stormwater Utility Feasibility Assessment Page 12 Conclusion The Town of Oro Valley faces many challenges in maintaining and improving its existing stormwater infrastructure. In addition,the Town will need to address the legal, institutional, regulatory and capital requirements associated with the NPDES Phase II regulations in the years to come. This document summarizes the issues associated with developing a stormwater program. This document also briefly summarizes funding options for developing and maintaining a stormwater program. Finally, this document describes the stormwater utility approach to stormwater management in more detail. More research is needed on the legal, aspects, costs and revenue potential of developing a stormwater utility,however,the stormwater utility concept appears to offer the most equitable manner in which to apportion the costs of developing, operating and maintaining a stormwater management program which is needed by the Town and for which no dedicated funding source currently exists. References Survey of Local Stormwater Utilities,National Association of Flood and Stormwater Management Agencies (NAFSMA), 1996 Survey of Stormwater Phase II Communities,National Association of Flood and Stormwater Management Agencies (NAFSMA), July 1999 Designing and Implementing an Effective Storm Water Management Program—Storm Water NPDES Phase II Regulations, American Public Works Association(APWA),February 2000 National Pollution Discharge Elimination System—Regulations for Revision of the Water Pollution Control Program Addressing Storm Water Discharges; Final Rule, Report to Congress on the Phase II Storm Water Regulations; Notice, 40 CFR Parts 9, 122, 123 and 124 Attachments Excerpts from Designing and Implementing an Effective Storm Water Management Program— Storm Water NPDES Phase II Regulations, American Public Works Association(APWA), February 2000 Chapter 2 What We Required To Do About Storm Water . • .y. • r.• :•ii• iii: :'i: :'r:• ��i• ii:� :v:• '•%'�%../i. :•rte J.• ii:•:"i• :i• .r.• i i. r':/! Ji: •J v is%•;:%•;:� ri:%�� •1•'i:• i!' .! .•r:' •/`.i:??'?r/•.•:•' :i%i�'ii i r r/i /'r- r/ /.•i'��:•i••J ' ,,;•••.••,;: %:i :iii%ij.•!;.J•{%i.' :•r. /J.: ,�:•iv�: .�. {:. :ir%•i� :ii•: ./% '!••:fir. :r.y i ii: ir:• i%ri•'%"%:. �:ti:•.:. .•%.r.. .!!.• ,i,i/,i.�:�i..•i;,r�i! r'�y! ! !J %�l J�rr�'• . � :r/,, '.•:•.,r:�J:'f ::. ir:•ii;:��!%:}/,yrrl l'rZi i i.. . rr:J.•/! � ;i.%i'C1.�rii:::!/,.. / ..��•..i; •. •'r ! r?ilii.'. i r ii :• X C�!y!. }tI f! j!f'i:i.•.i'rr. /'/, �.r .J'r r y-..r .:{.r.:v:•.:.•. a vii /j.•r/r;r. �/J/r.! .j. %%r.• .f�! f ♦ i�J Jr:v'�♦r !" .... •.v.� ... .�"'}: 'iii: %r?/%;/�:•Yf r.�f!j -/ !r..r:.•v•••••.'}}.,r i .!V'('.;•Yf!:'::_J!✓?'4ir'•'•' r +..,.�•' �:�%:• �/v/. /,i/ ;/ r'_�l,r;rr•. .., .iv+%r r• i :4,.. 5+:�;r Ali:; ! i j rrf%fl,•,yam,/� r r,r .c+F'',r f i.•.ifr:.-.f.,� '+�•.'."S�'••1jj7•'.y -Jy;. .:yl. r.! •i/, !•'/,,rri,it/♦��lr•'T• /•r r•�"'•'�^ r�'r: :. :v1••¢r� r,.�i i'� l'%/!> ijfrit' < /. i{:{- ..'. i;?yytiti •• •: ar {w Y!/, f`�.!;Yr�;rff ti�:�.}'riyJ ..?•Rr Y/�{/Y t J S..r r :• Y 4^ :i{t.•.. ♦! ti J.. 1. :5"1.•rl,,rtri� •f �v iFi: :ti f! •:p• �C jrr�,!{if'!�i %Y.r rrjtis•'.:• ;..r OY ''Y f♦ r.,.y .. .S^ `f'. SFf�Ji.`•Y`,�Ya�l�r�f r�. r4 r. ri� ♦•Z �^• �•r �•t Y�i'!.1�f.St,�.`:..ti� � {J 1 r , ! 'Dft , / 4rr�frif •♦'�•y ,� S� 'rf /r�i +�� fr..'� r�. � r'� �r4 /•Y�• !"'� r f 'r r r •.:.",{�'.' ••�:x ' .� f �• :1�T���[ Iry .ti: ,. i li"{�:��•i••%. r + .....r.: ti.�..rrrr:•.J - v r ! .<i`fj`ri;:>: ♦:'tr .r.,r{fxf.$^'r:`.•.'.'. r rJ^/. V i•T' r'�'<r ff vfr.•SC•aG' 7b'..v },..� {..r♦r4��.•.�r, f/•/!{!i�/41;� i�y rr.r ,fir'X X+ i,•r fr.Y.. f r 'S^:X, r,�`•�i�:,r�r �Nr�� •"� s'�y r f ~ rr.r.ri/rJ rwn•/••w gyp.t r W,� :� •�f'y{::::/N�_�v`,• K'nS .• r�:xrx rri r. ti♦ '•- ^ r.{vv yY,.rr`Nh•+}�. r.. ~`r !♦Jr?T�.'Qy, r t` �,Y!r .s J •�,v r!� r :r 'II t r�,.{,�,,�.� h ,. `. r �}{.•'JYiGf r'r v A``'" !! r !} !r v r ti ,!:, •.'_^rV►r -: { r dry .l yAy,M •-• . . J•,�Q''J(��[♦{�l�1yjVJ�/. f • ` r pTj �I r .1 Ny J/ r r �N ! L?"••••:W �• f.,fr Ny. •• ill:r ♦ r f•Jai• ", Y Y •~ A vt i ` �`iy♦Y?:✓�^•l...y., Developing an effective storm water management program makes sense. In addition to the practical benefits derived from storm water management programs,federal regulations govern how you manage storm water in your community. This chapter addresses: •An overview of federal policy and regulations for storm water management; •The objectives of Phase II regulations; •A discussion of EPA's role in administering the Phase II Rule, as well as the roles of state,local,and tribal governments and permitting authorities; •A description of NPDES storm water Phase II requirements; •A discussion of who is covered by the Phase II ■"'~ regulations;and • A description of what's involved in the Phase II ='•� permitting process. 1 Federal Storm Water Management Policy The federal government has finalized regulations for storm water management in smaller communities-known as the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES) Phase II Rule. This rule is designed to comply with the requirements of the Clean Water Act and to further protect our nation's streams,rivers and beaches from polluted storm water runoff. Phase II regulations follow the 1990 NPDES Phase I Rule, which addressed priority sources of pollutant runoff,including storm water pollution from medium and large municipal separate storm sewer systems, industrial sources,and construction sites disturbing at least five acres. Phase II requirements grew out of a long-standing concern on the part of federal legislators for protecting surface water. To better understand these regulations,you must look at the evolution of the NPDES program. The Clean Water Act The Clean Water Act(CWA)is the primary federal legislation that protects surface waters,such as lakes,rivers, and coastal areas. The CWA stems from the federal Water Pollution Control Act(WPCA), which was originally enacted in 1948. This legislation employed ambient water quality standards in specifying the acceptable levels of pollution in a state's waters. This approach-stressing tolerable pollution rather than preventable causes of water pollution -proved to be an ineffective means of preventing pollution. Other problems with the WPCA included awkwardly shared federal and state responsibility for promulgating the standards and cumbersome enforcement procedures. The CWA was developed in 1972 to strengthen and expand the WPCA. The CWA took a different approach to addressing water pollution. The amendments focused on establishing effluent limitations on point sources,or"any discernible,confined and discrete conveyance... from which pollutants are or may be discharged" (EL. 92-500). Increased accountability for protecting water quality was placed on dischargers of pollutants.The amendments also required states and tribes to survey their waters and determine an appropriate use for each,then set specific water quality criteria for various pollutants to protect those uses. Another addition to the 1972 CWA was the provision of certain funding mechanisms to help communities meet their clean water goals. The 1972 CWA also introduced the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). NPDES (Section 402) TheNPDES program was established as the fundamental regulatory mechanism of the CWA. The NPDES program requires !/ anyone discharging a pollutant from a point source into the waters 2 Federal Storm Water Management Policy Timeline 1940 ..,,,;.i,.;...,: . !->>-,. %/, `1950 - r: 1948- Federal Water Pollution Control Act originally Enacted .,,,...,q,)`4;;;;;// %,ii i'',. /.,•.•I;iJ•%! .. •r i''''',/1•'::',,I.(:::);%."''.•.%•%ji:•. • • •,),;,,),,,....,,,,,,,••••,',..,,:,,. 1972-Significant changes made to FWPCA ;%" henceforth known as the Clean Water Act .'-;i ,.:.,,,.:,..,:ir,,_,...);,,;.•!.,: ;, 1977- Minor amendments made to the CWA 1980 . -.., ./, ..,,;:-,,,,,::, ,. ..: 1981 - Minor amendments made to the CWA % % :- 1987-NPDES and nonpoint source programs established '` " 1990-Phase I implementation ,f•-• ,. December 15, 1997-Proposed Phase II rule signed 99p /'!?:.:;:; `% by EPA Administrator >.. October 29,1999-Final Phase II rule signed by EPA December 8 1999-Final Phase II rule published in Federal Register :•;.•,,...'•%;' , December 2000-NPDES-authorized states must modify '••i''" •;' their NPDES program if no statutory change is required `-•; December 2001 - NPDES-authorized states must modify "•::"> ::>;.••- their NPDES program if no statutory change is required 2 000 %:,,,-...,,„.-.;27.;-:, :•:!;;.:i December 2002-Permitting authority designates small MS4s --.'.;.•:•.;.,•..,•': 4;:,,.':;, i:• ' sir: '`/ ..-, .:.•j'" March 2003-Municipal industrial NPDES application due •,,,,,;•,,,,,./..,,,,;:,,,,,...;,,• .' 4i (ISTES sources) :!". '/"!%:v%'/iii'/.l-iJ/,r.•i:'. ••l:• • .•r i!%',..f? ,.• March 2003-regulated small MS4s and storm water .'. • ;.• - discharges associated with other activity submit permit ;:�ji:/i y •i%:•:.r!i/•. :,.f!: .:rJ�!'fi,. !�%�';.f�Irk:;!•:r/rf!.•.,- •,; of the United States to obtain an NPDES permit. The initial focus was on industrial and municipal wastewater. Controlling these targeted point sources has substantially improved water quality. However,several studies have shown that pollution from diffuse (nonpoint)sources-such as storm water runoff from urban and agricultural areas, construction sites,land disposal, and resource extraction(mining)-are now the leading cause of water quality impairment. Although storm water runoff originates from diffuse sources,it is often discharged through separate storm sewers or other conveyances,which are regulated under the CWA. The 1987 amendments to the CWA,therefore,added Section 402(p), which required the EPA to develop a comprehensive phased program to regulate storm water discharges under the NPDES program.This task promised to be challenging because storm water originates from so many separate,undiscernable sources,and there were not yet proven control techniques to mitigate storm water pollution. The Phase I rule was issued in November 1990. The rule addressed storm water discharges from medium and large municipal separate storm sewer systems(MS4s)(those serving communities with a population of at least 100,000), as well as storm water discharges associated with industrial activity. The Phase II proposed rule was signed by the EPA Administrator on December 15, 1997. Final Phase II regulations,which effect smaller communities,were signed October 29, 1999. NPDES permitting authorities must modify their existing NPDES permits by December 2000,if statutory changes are not required, or by December 2001 if statutory changes are required. Regulated small MS4s and storm water discharges associated with other activities need to submit their permit applications by March 2003 (or 3 years and 90 days after final regulations are issued). Regulated small MS4 programs should be developed and implemented by 2008,or five years after permit issuance. Appendix G includes a copy of the Phase II Rule. Appendix H presents a brief summary of other federal regulations that affect storm water management. What are the Objectives of PhaseII Regulations? The United States Environmental Protection Agency's(EPA's) objectives in developing the Phase II regulations include: • Provide a comprehensive storm water program that designates and controls additional sources of storm water - N discharges to protect water quality,pursuant to CWA Section 1011'-' .� 402(p)(6). 3 • 11.1 Major Differences Between Phase I and Phase II Phase I Phase II Who Is Covered • Large MS4s(serving a • Small MS4s(serving a population of 250,000 or population of less than more) 100,000 and located in • Medium MS4s(serving a an urbanized area or population of 100,000 to designated by the 250,000) permitting authority) • Construction activities • Construction activities disturbing five or more disturbing between one acres and five acres • Industries (specified by SIC • Industrial sources code) designated by the permitting authority • ISTEA sources (including municipally owned/operated industrial facilities) Monitoring • Mandatory ongoing • NPD ES permitting monitoring required of authorities establish medium and large MS4s small MS4 monitoring requirements Application • Very specific,detailed • Streamlined application Requirements application requirements. requirements • Application requirements • General permits don't lend themselves to encouraged;application general permits requirements lend themselves to this approach Program • Specific activities required • More broad— Requirements • Municipalities must address municipalities can commercial and industrial develop own BMPs to dischargers in the address minimum community control measures • Municipalities do not necessarily have to address industrial dischargers .� •Address discharges of storm water activities not addressed by Phase I, including: • Construction activities disturbing less than five acres; • "Light"industrial activities not exposed to storm water; • "MS4s located in urbanized areas not covered under Phase I; and •Municipally owned industrial facilities that were addressed under Phase I but granted an extension under ISTEA(Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act). •Facilitate and promote watershed planning as a framework for implementing water quality programs wherever possible. EPA aims to achieve these objectives by balancing nationwide automatic designation and locally based designation. EPA will designate on a nationwide basis: •Storm water discharges from small MS4s located in urbanized areas;and • Construction activities that result in land disturbance equal to or greater than one acre. EPA believes that this designation criteria addresses the main sources of storm water pollution causing significant degradation of surface waters. Permitting authorities may designate additional small MS4s,categories,or individual sources of storm water discharges that are problematic in specific communities. What is EPA's Role in Implementing Phase II? EPA's role in Phase II implementation includes provision of a flexible regulatory framework;development of tools to help the regulated community;provision of permits; and oversight of state programs. Provide Flexible Regulatory Framework EPA's approach is to provide a regulatory framework that ensures that permits issued to municipalities include the minimum control measures,while providing the NPDES permitting authorities with a significant amount of flexibility so that they can be sensitive to regional issues. Some of the ways in which Phase II allows for flexibility include: • Permitting authorities establish designation criteria for small MS4s located outside of urbanized areas. • Permitting authorities can designate other MS4s or construction,industrial,or commercial facilities that are not covered nationally, on a case-by-case or regional basis. • Permitting authorities may provide waivers to MS4s and construction activities in certain situations,such as where: •Construction activities of between one and five acres: (1)The value of the rainfasll erosivity factor is less than five(5); (2)TMDL assessment or equivelant assessment addresses the pollutants of concern. • Regulated small MS4s serving jurisdictions with a population of less than 1,000: (I) Its discharges are not contributing substantially to pollutant loadings; and (2) If there is a discharge of any pollutant(s)a TMDL is already established to address the pollutant(s)of concern. • Regulated small MS4s with a population under 10,000 if: (1)All water receiving discharges from the system have been evaluated;and (2)A TMDL or equivalent analysis has been conducted and allocated for pollutants;and (3) It has been determined that current and future discharges do not have the potential to result in exceedences of water quality standards. •General permits are encouraged and may be issued on a watershed basis. •Qualifying local programs can be incorporated in NPDES permit requirements. •Minimum control measures may be implemented by another governmental entity,such as a larger,neighboring community. • A cooperative and/or a watershed-based approach is encouraged. •TMDLs for single pollutant(s)os concern. EPA expects encouraging the use of general permits for the majority of sources to be designated under Phase II to lessen the regulatory burden placed on the permitting authority. EPA is also working to streamline the application/Notice of Intent(NOI) ( r process to reduce the burden on the regulated community. - 7 Roles of the Federal Government, States, Permitting Authorities, and Municipalities/Tribes in Implementing Phase 17 NPDES Regulations Federal All States NPDES Permitting Municipalities/ Government Authorities Tribes Develop overall Comply with Comply with other All regulated MS4s must framework of program: requirements as a regulatory requirements establish a storm water discharger: management program • Rule Designate sources: that meets the • Toolbox • State-operated • Developcriteria requirements of six MS4s minimum control • Permit • Apply criteria • State construction measures: Encourage use of sites • Designate • Public education watershed approach Communicate with EPA interconnected Provide financial sources • Public involvement/ participation assistance: • Address public • No a ro riated petition • Illicit discharge PP P detection and funds Provide waivers elimination • Federal grant Issue permits • Construction site programs Issue menu of controls Implement program for appropriate BMPs in • Post-construction non-NPDES authorized cases of general permits controls states,tribes,and Support local programs: territories • Pollution • Provide financial prevention/good Oversee state programs support(to extent housekeeping for Comply with possible) municipal operations requirements as a • Overseero rams Comply with discharger P g requirements as a • Federally-owned ' Ensure discharger,including y municipalities have MS4s(i.e., municipally adequate legal d/ crated hospitals/prisons) owned/operated authority industrial sources • Federal construction projects ," 8 develop Tool Box EPA has made a commitment to work with the Storm Water Phase II Urban Wet Weather Flows Advisory Committee to develop a "tool box"to assist states,tribes,municipalities and other parties involved in the Phase II program.This tool box will facilitate efficient and cost-effective implementation of the regulation. EPA developed a preliminary working tool box in 1999. The tool box should be finalized by the time the general permit is issued and will be updated as new information becomes available. The tool box will include: • Fact sheets; • Guidance documents; • Information clearinghouse; •Training and outreach efforts; •Technical research; • Support for demonstration projects; and • Regional workshops. EPA worked with the Urban Water Resources Research Council of the American Society of Civil Engineers to develop a database on BMP effectiveness, which is available on CD-ROM and through the Internet. For more information on this database,refer to Appendix I. Provide Permits The EPA is the permitting authority for non-authorized states, tribes and territories. EPA,therefore,has the same responsibility as any other NPDES permitting authority-issuing permits, designating additional sources,and taking appropriate enforcement actions. EPA will tailor the program to the needs of the state, tribe,or territory. Oversee state Programs EPA also must oversee the programs for NPDES-approved states and tribes. EPA and the states and tribes will work together to implement, enforce,and improve the program. EPA also will work with states and tribes to help them modify their existing programs where inadequacies exist. In addition, EPA reviews the continuing planning process (CPP)periodically,to assess the accomplishments of the program. If EPA's evaluation of a state's program deems that the program is inadequate,EPA will work extensively with the state to help improve the program. If the state program is not brought into compliance,the NPDES authorization can be ® te- -- revoked. r C- VA% What does the Federal Government Require for Storm Water Management under Phase II? For MS4s: The EPA requires, under the Phase II regulation,that all owners/operators of small MS4s reduce the discharge of pollutants from a regulated system to the "maximum extent practicable"to protect water quality. At a minimum,jurisdictions regulated under Phase II must: •Specify BMPs for six minimum control measures and implement them to the"maximum extent practicable;" •Identify measurable goals for control measures; •Show an implementation schedule of activities or frequency of activities; and •Define the entity responsible for implementation. For Construction and Other Activities: Construction activities that disturb one to five acres must also be regulated under an NPDES Phase II permit. The NPDES permitting authority may also require that other facilities and industrial and construction activities,as well as small IYIS4s outside urbanized areas,be designated on a case-by-case or categorical basis. Each of these requirements is discussed in more detail in the subsections that follow. P.. :1. ......,_,........,::„."*-:,:,..gag-,:itic :•I �::�%:�;:'::.;:. :„ :J�• �J� .J- :f .J' :.::::,:whiak ::,:::::::-,;:-:.i.,: :::,,,,:,; •:{{• •:is t:' _ :J: _ :.• it� 1.•r• JJ :J '•1::�' .J •: JJ•. -J. J •'-i. •i r ��ti C: ,} :f :f }� :,., . J '...,,.':::11:*.h.,;:.,,..--,:i.::::::k:y.::-..,.:::::::: 'I J• •J:-J:5S. •r : :•r '%r: J.:r-'•��%:J:-ir'.. ::.':::::' :J.:. :v.:•.! r .f• %i. J. •r 4::•i•• /:J::::=• v 'r•J.•: :•}":•� :r:.vl.•:-'r::. :r::::• °:•:•:•:-::�'� •rw: :v{r.' 'Y• r. ,f•:�: •.\:v:, r'ir,r. .J'vY.r?: .r.. .r::.. 'rr :r l: J' rY.C-i•_'!:�.. .{:!.•r'r:��'•irY •r: •Y'rr� J.. .r .!r.•:: :J,•.:•:: :fy�: }i• , .�•r•(�J�,•:J J:.�. .f., {t:.. Jr.. •:1 .•!�''-:t•. :JJ {...r,.;�.;•;�jr.Y:. .{J✓_:f r..,t?{:::..�f;.. :•.:;�•:: •:illi J-•J lJ rJr JJ JJJ V: •.V •. �rr - - .J.. .•'J•!}'•:l✓•!}. 1.. I:rJ. •.�•::::::::::r'::- ' -J.V. • JJ-• _ :'J '.1• r.' i+ ls.��:�s�:. f.. .J.. .r ''rr•� ':• :J •!• '•i• :r::Jri:.Y,. IJ:Jr: 1 '•li:%:':r•• J:•J•'J:-J. r: .n ..'i: lm •!'.iii•:rivJ '•r:✓• .J r:• \.-l-v. .:. r4:i rr•r:: v. v y•i .-,• .. h.r v' :/.•::ti ./r rr.tiJt::.. :, Y:. ! }i: ii v:,{.'.v.. ::!:„--0:ii!.:::.. :i: - 'r. {: w.r :rF.J.:v. :}..!. .ter.�•.•r':: {{ 1•'{.}•• f r :r•:•:•.•S• ..'.•:r.. i.-'% :}::..J':i:{. --:; r. :Jll: •�::• V:•:Jl:A:'r.7::.rJ,. 'J •/.:. :•%•.. :•l:i.•!::•,-:•.'.':' •.C}:•:;!J. :' :l: :.�. .�. •I: .J.:% .l.:r:•.!. •!-• J••:�• ;.�:1.•i:.I`.�;!•:f't. .f{rJ.'.!'.:':�'. �:•l:��;: :,4• rr :!•ii Jr J yL 7��N����:'�V... •� ::� '�W..;�`[ •����j ���•�:{�.y�{y,,� .{•::v.•:::•::::ti•r '-. :�r ��✓':J. .ANN fYJN!J.•J:yq .JJ rrr.4 r_r.-W}.+ J v• :{•:Jr-•. •v..-!�:_ S .:T �!'!!�'J�r.},_.J..�7S•:::T-� �•_v r..ti{ .✓r•. .!.J. .•:.r J.. .'J...\•�h++•�. ._V. .F..J_.�.'.•'-'-Y•':-r��._ _!-:•- Y.:\..J:.. tJ Y J.✓:::.::.:. ^ .J_. }:::{r:->Y.ti J'. Vii:• - .l. _ fes; Y :" - r: :rr.: .r•:- -Y :f�! {{•. :•}ice:::% Jr::.f... f :r✓:. .r:-. % J. tti': �rJ J.' .h r..F•:��:l:YJ•.,{.. .f-•.:'Y..J• J.••:{ :r-•:I::i••JJ:::'••.. •:•::•� Y.. �'�•' :.••:. :'%' 'J:Y.r. r�' .r. .!!.•r•J,• .J.•':'!:J:r' ..f.. Jr'!:-.'.': C. :i. r :i':f: n r::::<r r• ,:...r•:p:.. {.•• :{:/.; .::%•J-•J:f.J-kk!•• r r: J•'�'�' r..r.::.. .�.. -r••n .'1:• fJI.:•tiv+:y.f./v5'•.:v.{ti:.r.::• •'r.! ... 'v v:}:• •tijf .rl v +'• ti{r {{:•5i••�__:J i• .J•:-:•.v:r::.vr .:v. ::•:•:•:::•}:•.•: v: :Jr:% .v.:�:f '• ��• i' f':fir:rrr -f- r{:..,.r. .•+�iti:}:• }r r•. r. !:•:f• .i ''-i'✓)•J}:•n.f...r..v.v: .r::.v v' ,ihi,ki::,;:..-.E •'%' �.�rj: : '• J: •.y �,.. :r: Yi -+!. v./ 1:'•Xr:�::fv.y Y...! /:\. { .. •:r.•::! .:t•: :'i: :� "f{j'7::.. i•Fra {AM.. .r �i....t=�attN•►'I{:':ti�:t J:•.rh%•:•'!{�i.:�• iJ:J.�'l' rrN. .li'.;..:�:Jvr::/•:ti•,'r:::./.•��a�� Y..�/• •!:.J / :N•J• .r.r._..r:: {.r, :.: {-:}:': :ri:{ ',: : J.:••/.J } /'• Jl.:• J-.if'vr.J✓,, �/• •:%r .. ,,i4 i:.: fJr�•j. '•' �,.Y {•-:J/},r�: r JFJ::,lti• :Jr ,/r.+ l F•..f�S'�rJ'�:•rs•.. v:J. :r.. !::'.:;:,•'r,?:::i{�{{•:}:'r. •. JYFi ���/. '�r !} j/. J U•l:r .! / •J••• J' F. •Y✓`r •.�IJJ w!r•J h+}:.. : :� ''h,.. }:r✓r-ir r• ;.la,• -:: r :tf':!F••:: g 4: l•;q.i rf ii /:r tii:yJ�J. :Y•:::i f:+vti:JJ •/ J ::"i':•• ;.:�:• f'i�'�r r f }t+l � } iY.y7.7iC��ri'w•�► ?=� amirenan s i:•: :•r.::-.- :3 .i -•}: y:{Jr j;.;.vr.. .J•. Jv. !.r/J��•.v. :rv•:••r:: .+:•!.•:••:/.w.• /• :r .r r.:•:{5-.-. Y.J} Cti{:-:v.:,}.,::•rry�• {.. •! .J.. r .Yr:v:. +JJ.../:• : -,Y,. .J y i•i'f{:i.:i :it .•r:....4::v:•::: Jr. .J.•:: .4+rJ:!' .�. vJr:,+v/r•)J J. .J . •.f.:.yJ:�•••rl.�:.r!rrrrr_i1.� :�''�{ r>yCr •J f:�''l ,y�. J.. .J• J..:.{.. {. } :Jr .J.:..SF.J r,:}{:,,,,:+S.fttr{{._r -:'C_:'+.. -i--`e••.'ty{.; ::::.,,,4.•Gi 'v %:hit•'{: .....SJJ'Ai •_f-•r.} r •.•... :1:-a::::: {:J:'{:. •s .: _r. �•..J•w i.. :•j;-y; '-.rjr.1r: .wC•:. r. _ r::.-Jf.�:}J�::r{- :J r_J.{•::.�:=:-._•::- :r: -''C. r- �/^[]JE •{:y►�y�■ �•'�•:;.,��.}may(,��'..}�/'.►�'[�� �.`r •r,L.•. {r.•.v.J.; _ .r. t.i.y+++:1::-:•t._ :• %:%. yr :\•. •'-.•. .J:. ;,:::::-:::;::::.:v.:::,;:.!:::-,.::q •f: r :r,• •r. .; 1{. .iv,. :•r;r.. rr• •y;::::•irr• :n••v'• .}.- Q J •:�. :v:•T. + •� •:::rr•r.:/./•r.:if'?�:�/:�r.•:::{.l. F/.•:{:%:is:':. :r}:v: n• :r... r.. �•.v.. .r-..r..:. ,r.. :r• •r:}i'• v::. • :: .j.::•):1:�i:•S:•?i'•i: ••�. :fi •.{•:v{rr'::•• :r•:• •r:.' .I... .r: .rrr : v.:! n•}:'•::•:Jrr.•.. . . .:.. \: :'l} :J,.+. J• •ll::•l: Jr i• .J.. .V{•l:: •r..•J. J.. .'f:•.Y:.:} :f:r.., .'•'J•. ,,,,,:::::.,':,-,:,,i,,..::- :::-:::.::::: }i:: -r'• •:: •.} .• .r:r r: !r.++iV:Y%:/•v /r:.• .r.'' r.. J �i:r'}:J::•:�i:•%JJ:.•:' .rr.::::::' :'r'•'•• v '%. .rl':.•:.•�. ./. . r•t�..Y;•:':: .:-t.. .!:}./.. :'::%.:'1J.rJ.Y• •�:r•J.r.':.•:.. .iJJ•.�.'.'... !.ti•%:..!.''::•:''•::':•:::. :•1.•: .• :�r.:., .•r:! .J:r.! r.�rJ'•::r.�. J.f.-.;}J:r:J:i ter.::••:.:•:�. :r.. ✓. .r.. �}, :i. .is I: :✓'•.•:•':' .v :'J• ,t.,,r:. :!.{:•::t.•.•:::.:. .l:":Y.'.. r: t'r•: :•Y. ,r: .• J4: •:•v:' J.!. .r.• ... :r.v .J.•:�:r:•Y:�:C��::::�:'. :v• ' •J {y: I: + %:. •.tiff.;:. :S_..J.. r{r V• _ __ r, ++ �r� �•�a{. r: j.j. ��( ':•}:' .� • f ice• �j �!�Y `��• _ .:,:::..g.:.f.:,.,. : :{:; ;'r• - :•J .jf• rt. :r.. .+: ` r. .I { i,i,,iii....?:.::::ii:,i....--;::04:;:ovat54., ritttt '-p.::::vi- J:.I .J� .JJ::�•i �� �[; ' r:�•i .:,:i:iiitittgb:.i,::::.:.:; /�{r�.�•� % r J, - _ �` _ r::': : ter'::r._:{•: .;:y._•.:.. �• -ter%.: •t ••Y rf,• l' •r• J._ .! rN: r:' r. _ ::r r . • f:• i:: :J. .;t•tip.;:•:.' ._____:..:..m.......,_,, r: - r 'J' .ee�� -ate:;:::�:.. 4 •r,. .+ :r :r•+ .t: 4•'r .r. ::i; •r:%'r :Jr: .r. .ti• ..�::3":•....r J.•.::r.•• _r.. .n,.7•:.•:J.. : !"'_:�•��r. ,•. .r: ;:: .r.. X.l.. .!/.•• .".•!: v• .. J, r. :i:�}':ti�':•. •r• .r• _.r v. ......,_....4410N. rJ, ,� it J. •.ti: r. .t:: .r: r. \ :J. �;y•��;�,•�rjj•r { rJ:: I J• .J. v. J "viumffi,............0:10. 1°' ' •:•ii .:...:.:-.:,,,,:::::::i:::,----- 10 BMPs for Six Minimum Control Measures Municipal storm water management programs must specify best management practices(BMPs)for the following six minimum control measures: 1) Public Education and Outreach on Storm Water Impacts •A public education program must be implemented to distribute educational materials to the community. •The community should be made aware about the impacts of storm water discharges to waterbodies and the steps needed to decrease storm water pollution. •Municipalities are encouraged to work with their state and Phase I communities to develop an education/outreach program more efficiently. 2) Public Involvement/Participation •The public must be involved in developing the municipality's storm water program by following state, tribal, and local public notice requirements. •All economic and ethnic groups should be included. • Examples of public involvement/participation that should be considered include public hearings,citizen advisory boards, and working with citizen volunteers. 3)Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination •The owner or operator of a regulated small MS4 must demonstrate awareness of their system,using maps or other existing documents. •They also must develop a storm sewer system map that shows all outfalls,and the location/name of all waters of the US that receive discharges. •A Phase II community must effectively prohibit illicit discharges into the separate storm sewer system. •Appropriate enforcement procedures must be implemented. •A Phase II community must develop and implement a plan to detect and address illicit discharges(including illegal dumping)to the system. • Public employees,businesses,and the general public must be informed of the hazards associated with illegal discharges and improper disposal of waste. 0 • Need to specifically address categories of non-storm water �,--- discharges in 40 CFR 122.34(b)(3)(iii). 11 4) Construction Site Storm Water Runoff Control •The owner or operator of a regulated small MS4 must develop,implement,and enforce a program to reduce pollutants in any storm water from construction sites of more than one acre. •An ordinance or other regulatory mechanism must be used to control erosion and sediment to the maximum extent practicable and allowable under state,tribal or local law,as well as sanctions to ensure compliance. •Must include procedures for site inspection and enforcement of control measures. •Must have procedures for input from public. •Must address water quality impacts through site plan review process. •Must require construction site operators to control wastes generated at site. • Existing erosion and sediment control ordinances may suffice, if approved by the NPDES permitting authority. 5) Post-Construction Storm Water Management in New Development and Redevelopment •Owners or operators of regulated small MS4s must develop, implement, and enforce a program that addresses storm water runoff from new development and redevelopment projects that result in land disturbances of at least an acre and that discharge to their MS4. •Appropriate structural and non-structural BMPs must be used. •Controls must ensure that water quality impacts are minimized. •Adequate long-term operation and maintenance of BMPs connected to a regulated MS4 must be addressed. •The goal,at a minimum,should be to maintain pre- development runoff conditions. •EPA encourages the use of preventive measures,including non-structural BMPs,which are usually thought to be more cost-effective. 6) Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping for Municipal .. ,. _ Operations • Owners or operators of small MS4s must develop and -1) ) implement a cost-effective operation and maintenance as well as employee training programs with the goal of preventing or reducingpollutant runoff from municipal operations. 12 .P P s EPA Encourages: •The use of maintenance activities and schedules and long- term inspection procedures •The use of controls for reducing or eliminating the discharge of pollutants from roads,highways,parking lots, maintenance and storage yards,and waste transfer stations •Implementation of procedures for the proper disposal of waste,such as dredge spoil,floatables,and other debris removed via operations and maintenance activities •New flood management projects should incorporate water quality protection to the greatest extent possible •Pollution prevention measures in municipal operations,such as golf course maintenance,fleet maintenance,open space maintenance,planning,building and oversight, and storm water maintenance Measurable Goals for Control Measures The requirement of identifying measurable goals for each control measure is unique to Phase II. Communities regulated under Phase I were not required to devise measurable goals. Examples of measurable goals include: • Inspecting or repairing a certain number of drain inlets each year; • Conducting street-sweeping operations a certain number of times each year; •Surveying all municipal right-of-ways to identify illicit discharges; •Conducting a certain number of training classes for municipal operations each year; •Soliciting the help of a certain number of volunteers each year to perform water quality monitoring or education/outreach activities;or • Reducing sediment loading. Implementation Schedule of Activities or Frequency of Activities Regulated communities must show an implementation schedule of activities or frequency of activities that will be done as part of the storm water management program. An example might include the following entries: / _ Sweep entire x miles of road in county 2 times per year �r•- Vacuum storm drain inlets 2 times per year 13 - __ Who is Regulated Under Phase HP Automatically Included Exceptions Owners/operators of small municipal • Systems that serve less than separate storm sewer systems located in 1,000 people where no urbanized areas including military significant impacts are known, facilities,large hospitals,prisons or other and where TMDL assessment such MS4s operators that exist in an addresses the pollutants of urbanized area. concern if any are identified. • Any other system waived from the requirements by the NPDES permitting authority. All construction site activities involving Requirements could be waived clearing,grading and excavating land by NPDES permitting authority equal to or greater than 1 acre(including based on: projects that are comprised of several • Low predicted soil loss(erosivity sites of less than one acre each). factor of less than 5);or • TMDL addresses pollutant of concern. Municipally owned/operated industrial Industrial and other sources that sources required to be regulated under provide a written certification of the existing NPDES storm water "no exposure of materials and program but exempted from immediate activities to storm water." compliance by ISTEA. Conditionally Included Owners/operators of small municipal separate storm sewer systems meeting the criteria for designation(to be established by permitting authority) Owners/operators of any municipal separate storm sewer system contributing substantially to the storm water pollutant loadings of a regulated,physically interconnected municipal separate storm sewer system Construction site activities that disturb less than 1 acre of land that are designated by the permitting authority 15 Entity Responsible for Implementation Regulated communities must also indicate who is responsible for the storm water management program. There may be one individual in one department who is responsible for the entire program,or the responsibility may be shared among several departments. Many Phase II communities have a more limited resource base than communities regulated under Phase I. Phase II communities will also have a broad array of governing structures. Defining an implementation entity will therefore require much thought and perhaps some creativity. The Phase II regulations are amenable to creative implementation strategies,as they encourage communities to take a watershed or cooperative approach. Communities may also be covered under a neighboring Phase I community,or allow another entity,such as a county,to implement certain minimum control measures or portions of minimum control measures. The regulated entity, however,is still responsible for complying with the requirements of the permit. In defining an implementation entity,you should consider the following: •What financial resources are already available to your community? •What will the cost of implementing and operating the storm water management plan be? •What other communities are located in the watershed? •Who in the community has expertise in storm water management components of a storm water management program? •What actions have already been taken that would qualify as BMPs under the Phase II regulations? •Are there neighboring communities or other communities in the watershed that already have a storm water management program in place? •Are there neighboring communities that will also be subject to proposed Phase II regulations with whom a community can share resources? Who Is Covered by Proposed Phase II Regulations? Those covered by the NPDES Phase II regulations include the federal government,tribes,states,local governments,individuals undertakin construction activities, and industr . g ;moi►___---�--�'' 1 6 On a national basis,the following entities will be covered: • Owners/operators of small MS4s located in urbanized areas;and • Construction activities resulting in land disturbances equal to or greater than one acre. The NPDES permitting authority could, however,provide waivers for construction activities serving less than 5 acres if certain conditions apply,such as: • Determination of low soil loss associated with construction activity based on an erosivity factor less than five;and •A TMDL assessment or equivelant analysis addresses the pollutants of concern on the construction site. Waivers could also be provided for small MS4s if they: • Regulated small MS4s serving jurisdictions with a population of less than 1,000: (1) Its discharges are not contributing substantially to pollutant loadings;and. (2) If there is a discharge of any pollutant(s) of concern. • Regulated small MS4s with a population under 10,000 if: (1) all water receiving discharges from the system have been evaluated;and (2) a TMDL or equivalent analysis has been conducted and allocated for pollutants;and (3)it has been determined that current and future discharges do not have the potential to result in exceedences of water quality standards. In addition,the NPDES permitting authority could extend designation to municipalities,construction sites,or industrial/commercial sources outside of the nationwide designated classes on a case-by-case or categorical basis. Small MS4s located outside of an urbanized area,for example,could be included based on watershed and water quality considerations.At a minimum,the rule requires that the NPDES permitting authority consider for regulation a particular subset of small MS4s located outside of urbanized areas. Other storm water discharges from unregulated industrial, commercial,and residential sources could also be designated if an NPDES permitting authority deems it necessary to protect water -4mr quality. { rCT q 17 r�� It is important to note that the fE1f :%f.:,•rv•:r:r:f•rrr%}::: :�.•.:i:r! :'.l:':�}rr..•:'�•,�:•:':I:r jte:•:irr;J::: '1-:i:/r••::/J!{":::,%...•�•r'%r!1/:if•.!r.%i.ti�i.Yi!r/%i%/.':l;ri}':%:�rs�A_i'..ir::::v Jri:,:••:r,r%%I'r'%.•::'}:.�:J:•••%%.'%.'r't:•i':.'..::i ir::'••,::1i.!/J::'r%:�f JJrff_•il:s::::}{:r};�•:::::i�'•''i. .{•i:�•r:'r:%.:-ce�:;%!'r+rI�:'i::vi':;:i, s••:J::•.i:::•:�:•tr.:•'r'r•7r:rr/%�.:'..:v..:':J.'•j'f•-J.� ..}?.�:r.'?v:i:•l•[�hv::':.•!'•Ir:Y:::.:%r'::'..:':•:%�:r::}::%r.•:r:•:frr:•::f�r�,ri..:'i•i '�••:::::.•':�.�f•:.J•:tir'.}r%.i:'v!ff_�.,.��,.!f..'• �r+.!'•..r.:J�-f=rJl}•1,}:::.,r::'�:!v.. J.i11Jlr..:�:/•::iJ:r...•.J.l r':J:✓:•�r..r::•_.r.r:ri::�r•,r',.•.r:::ft.J•,Yr::r.•�•v!!1i!}trJJ'.. ;•...f.r•;'.v'•• ::•.:--::Y._:J.•::n:r:1r.{'':!•r..'•Xfr;ror:r...-._r�.•r�r�'f:r.�r:•N;••••.}?•::•i"•}:-:..'.:.':i.•}:. :'!f::;:r{:/l.:fJ�'vr•.•••:�..}i�.•..!.j.:•:rv'{rvr:Yr%J'-.:•J 11 :.t.:•�'•..•r.:.'J:••;Ji.:•:..::t•v.r.{YJ.•.'!ry r:.:•l•v lrrrJ[/...X•:.r:. �!7.:,jj r�:.::'r.rrro'i•'-S•:s• :..r!..•/:::.•.,�'i::..•.••..:{.- .v l:•!%...J}:1.:''Y...:}:.•t•.xter:,..:r! 1rrr'.:,J'ff:•.i�.J•ti..{.r::..•.•r•}..'•::-.!•y.t•.:r::�r/•.•.�.:riY'v}J!..r'i:•'•:'r(:!..f:rJ�j!•J•.:':::.l.;•�rF:r:l:!:..•r••::.:i!riJ::lJ.:•:.':•;.•..tir:�1,_rr::!::iJs:•:L•• :i:.::r::.:•}-•i.-Ji.r�!.r{:i:'r}l.}:r•r:::!i:•-...•iJ:i:::/ >:.r••�.•�s:tiv.iJ..{:i:�}:'..�v:/rxr':..h>:.:•J••�v.:.•:J••�•�rf�!r./J:::}'i.iY'-:1i•}..•::�:'�!:: ':.v.v••:.r:..•�.:.._}:..r!.ir.v:r:J':.,'r.rrri:=r. .�!•.'JSryr•J:..r�'r::r.•.•YM::w ti.::J•.-s.i!yr:F:rJr:•� ''r�-.''::r.:J:ir:.i�:l•.•i'Lr.-.'I:.•�:;i r:::�r.�.:••l-••l••*rY•�vr�::S:.'rr:'il::•.i %•'��i r/L..:.:::}.{J•:J..•.v•v:�:r'1:•.rr::J�r•.l:rr{: Y�✓'.•r:-•'•ri!r:..:..'fir:'j,•_YL.rr•.rJ:'.r..•••:•• �•r rJ.:.l•v.r::%.}.y:L•l:lf•r.r..,Jr.:.!.:=:}.+•.J...�Y r�Lf..r.�.if:%..•, '•.i•rri!rlii:.: .:.!'.:-J.i•.l r{i••irY1:rr.J:%•?;•ae: .r!:•JYJ..:v.•wr•:'.,r,..'Jr.i: !i.::r:�:J.J,•:•;.v.iJf}A!-:rri•!r. .:ft7rl's�.'.�rrrr•J.:'!r::}rrl.:• ri..:lw�..ti:::YJr.':•frL?:.r•r..::i/:.rrlte.•'r:.�..;r•r'-.Y.Yr r s_.:f:rS}�•e'J.fJ:�J.3n✓?c.�rf4LCs..!'r_:r,..'r}.• J'..-f:r rJrr.!!}':.!:!:v::•Jr:..:frr'({..rr•..r:;.•:•r'' :•.+r:r�.::..•:.:.r�:�fi':.:'iti!.r:.}.•Y•..{:,{..!�Y..r:";rr.•�'iJ,_J:J:•?r.'r r.rJ::' :►.:.•�'l.:i:=:,.Ai:Ja..:.:J.t.'Jr:�:r:L:}:.Y.:'•:,.r••-J -:'/�.:}r:r,::!Y::r✓�.:_:.�Y':. %if!•✓::':tir•..llY:t.•ii:J..r.t:•i!{::r Pt• '.rt:v:i.f!.?•.i::'r1:}r/'J::ir r r 1:Jr::j:�/�•J•,•:J�'t:.ftrr.-/..!'.v.J^• �•:{�sp'.::jY.�r•r�•rJ.•..::i:w•}.v,..•�•h:v!rsrrl7•'ti-ri.•:irr S:iiAU.?'.J•ir:i..•.:.Y{:ir••.•-�r:'•./..!Lfi.r.�r••.:}l::eA%r•%"!;•ri!rya•�J:irY,:'..in'!-i'�:Y.•/•..'r:r/.':.::!•.�•.•!�i•l!al.•:r:rii•rr.i.ri•:.:.s_:r.1.J'.•.%v T.r:,rr.•.,�J-L.•,:n••J:••rr_•.J:_•,r-S•::::!S'l ttSl f.�!:{�'I.J.:.rJe •.;.•::..:1J�.rr .'.'t; •:::.::r,:Jr:r:if: :.:f.':-••.!r:.!ir.::i'.•{.s.fJ._-pti�:m:Y.r•:�.-is•t�; .::.:Irv.• r..}:y•.,�•'.v:••rr.t.:rr•: ..v�:.[l.lY:r�...•:J.'%J r. •.'..ily:..:.•,•r:�J:':.r:,:;:•JI Y'•r•r ..•:.!r4lY�:i[:•;•::.r.✓.-, ..:rJ:':..r.am%l:{ste.:v_-V J:..vi:::.:i i'J?..;,.v::.}:-��}.•L':{L••�,C...LyiJ.:.[!{r.:r'�J-:::•-{ •�.N•...:Ji!•J•.i...r::�::,•iv•..r'.•:L•r•.-.frr�..tir r.r�:•.:'.i.•1.::•,:e•:J.•:!i{f:::.-:rJ:.Y•:•rr::: /.a'!m:.v:!:!;t.':•-•::l..-.%!4.:.:..:J.!gJ•,::=:•::rr'..:_"•�.:rJv:ti:vrJ::...-.•..'•.=•f.�.:.:•r.�!rJ:.::•vJ,!:4r.}u:{'.:J✓.J•:•::....::r•t rr:';S.•+. •.::.r.i:':.•::3.:.r I:r:SJl/::J�4.r:YJ}'JJ:{ :•}j7fr.r�j•.r•Sl:::�.l'.r'�:.::J•:•v v:'•.Jv?..r1•j...r:'ir.,:a�: -!..,l_.ii"•_...::•.•r•::t'.rJ�r.:•r'iJ:.•�N..•.r.:::'l.�.•.:.`t.•:'!.f:.lter.•.ri�?;-::,.rt•:ir 1r ti•:1r..}r•:ti:.:.,!%:S.•sL'• .':..t.:.rr..•'::%:::.Ji�::•:�'ir:.r�v.r-{..:•J:•L:.J.%!:::.•rrf:..r.✓•'•::•o%ri•-:r_•.�i•'••_ ��.:::.::.•:i.'�.'..vv:%�:%.:,..n•• 'Y:::{':•r!6::'..i.l:'_'.=,.-:.•:.:•.�. ..:.{.J%:..�r�•.:.'Y: :J-:J;.:rr:J'r:l•{.��:r:rr:'s:•�.L•:!::j:f•..Jrr'J.':%.J�l•.:!JYji:t•.r.:!� .r :••.:r:�•:�••r:.!i.•:,•,.Y..•�•: �i..•r:- '•.JJ also ls'o:'::.•,:-::�4:f•:��:f r/�••.':.•:i••::.•:i"i:_.•Y•.••f ;•:r:.•=..lyr>:v.•r �':',.�::•S.:Viif•/r•.•S{::ir:apply pply iiA.�i••:}:f•.::i:•ir.J:.o�'.•- ., • '.•i:::• •:r•:,:::JlJ•J r:'.:::..:i•:'.if Y;•:�•'.:{•..• • '::::dr•:{:r::J:•,•••!J.t:..: :•;::'i.:;:.,�%•.:Y::{•{•::r�i:f. .i..l..•ti'r%r. o commu communiities ahatwill be included under the 2000 Census. These tre expected to have the same deadline as those otincluded under the 1990 Census- nher words, 3 years and 90 days from publication of the final rule. f t.- •/ l:' ii i:_Y:-: :'i:i•:i••:J,•.:'.f:�r:!r•rJ:: �. .::-•'.•v•.'i%.r::•:..: '!..•. .{ti:J✓•.r..'{'::: ;S: ;•�•:l.�li.r:'{:: •r'.•.:_.}l;:•.J.i.-..�'.!:::;ti':/vJvy :.; •:•:... Li.:•=.:r.r.::•'•.�i:;:•:•i.J ::•:.• • •:.::.;,r.. - �r � A; f :"'';:;:..:::::: y ti • • ntarpork : ir • • f •t'•PP-0;11-0.00,;fiL. • } :: L ! : iYvr:r . ' ;�:-}'!rrS'::v:�,�• ::...v:.!'. • i::,• ;v•:v:L?:•J•i r J:r%�%•Cry it _ • f. What's Involved in the PHASE II Permitting Process? There are two types of NPDES perm .irJ:r.i•v:.' •:r••.i:; }r: .:•: :.{:• rr: general and individual. An individual permit is a permit specifically tailored for an individual facility based on the information contained in the application(s). The permitting authority develops a permit for that facility based on the information contained in the permit application,such as type of activity,nature of discharge,receiving water quality,etc. The permit is then issued to the facility for a specific time period (not to exceed five years). A general permit is developed and issued by a permitting authority to cover multiple facilities within a specific category. General permits may offer a cost-effective option for agencies because of the .. - large number of facilities that can be covered under a single permit. - Permittees usually submit a Notice of Intent(NOI)to the permitting authority to be covered under a general permit. Generally both types of NPDES permits(individual and general) are obtained by application to the EPA or to the appropriate state agency. The owner or operator of a regulated small MS4 would be it .,.:_,-.----:-::,:::::-,::::::_:::•::::,,,,.:,--:::: ,:at - - Vi • is:•r '�i y' 4i,:•aii.,::Antall:::.::§iii gumi:::4::::-:::;.:::::::::::-,,,;:::,iw:i..:,,::::.,!..-:.,...:;:::,.1-.:.:::::.0.4:ii.;:m:::::,:,.,.....:,'::::::-.1:: :.'.�l��. ems-���� � Are: •L' !.Pl. :•i: .r• :'I' :'i:• '•i:-:!• 7:tri:.r. r i%� :J.. • .• J•J: J J! .. .•�• J rr.. , i-,.:4,..i.:I.,.-a,.,..-0, •r. •r: to' �:� �•. '..,i•,--,.i..:ilAitiner#.4v.%-,!-,,,.,::.:;..:,:-:::-.,,,::-::,::::,: ::,-.:::.1..!:4:!::::::::g.:'::: :Eikiit-p :.:',-.1,..'::--,:-..--...,_-----,,,,,--•-•:::,,,,,,,,,,,, . .- .e-r:--ri-. :�•J: to :-'9ar: a�� �. „,„.„-.4,,,,,,,,:.:,.,::.,:,:,:,:.:,,,::,:,:::.:-: rir 9,::::.::::::.::::,.:.:;:,:,,....-:,::::,,,,,. :t .J::. !:' 9.I .r:i •G:�i{J .,,,. ..is•..r•r.. •r: r tif•: :,:-...,:,,, 4.t10:0::.-;::.ig;:i::::::.:-'.1:::::,ai:, ,•7 i • A tNgiii-iiiiiii:..i:;;:a:-..i:,...,:iii r { _ .r:.. '!.•: '.Y• ..}{•rrr:S•. .•r.: •S - ''!:':•!:•l is i{•: •:t ii. :r.. f :;lir. �i' � .�;�tai;r���::�������:?! .r :iLr.. •Y.':.ti•i:' !. ii• ••1 iliiiikitivil......114:11:014:0 v: iipsi-kiv..migg::.} •1. "::iii-:-.11::::i..:;:ii::14:.:::::iiNti:::t:,):-i;.::::.:;,::.:::1::!:::;i::,..41::•:.-12::2iig.-I:;.iii:liiirigiliiili.Ikspigg• iv :J •' :v :!.:'.•::is :J y[ _ r• i :t: `� J:' r• • - - • :ice= ��:�-:=:�'::•:•:::::..::.•:•:::::•::_• • :is •i-• :r•�, r: r•:•i: �• ! ! r J.• .J,•r . v• : Jr jl J r• •.�':C .r•r ,r.vil��::�i 'i=!r l .r..�`•' • r••'.V :J;•vii:•::. !'r J �!J..Fl:rti!.. .•r• :�r:i: :r'.:.�i:?'r',�ii!r:•:v.li::-'r•:•f' /• •%•:::::::Ci:i: .r'f f•• •.:/ ! f f :�y:' Er. {. '•:rr:}•r. rr r.. .r:' :Y:•:/!• r:i'•�}..r.. :is :i J I :'• :r -,:..,,,:,,„..m?.,:ff,,..,:, ::::::m::: ,::':':':':_::.:::.:::.::.::.. ��// 1.ii.. �r :.:• !.:f.. •1 :Jr :vr r..:: i:•i:.r::.J.<{{:i L::'••Ji :JJ/..•.9�Y.Y'' /.•:�•:• .rr• I.J %:�' %j:y:�r:�!:•:'• r :r :r: • :f�: .J:L. J 't.J 1�1�.��y��j� ;!i--r•' 'ii _ v• .-r F_• l " .J. •.{.:tN. 1•• I r 1.. " .,ii' :ter J. Jl J: .•r :J: {y (214) • Y. J.{•: •�•� Y.. .5.i: r• 'i. • /� is A. :::::-.1w-a•g.i:::: :,-.: ,,�:is /� ;f' �/ .rr ,T� :��r l v. Iii!I:•i Y=t " r j'��}. :i7�7.+1�7 �� •• ./ Y. r;f t• •Y JI 'r. ',':i::::.l.:.:iiiii:::.t::gfiigjif:.:,iioolofkiftt.wp:•{• 1. _ r• •Y.. • J: J}.'..•:Y!::•:;:fir!!•:'._ :!. :is- �y,�;:Y ••!-f' ' ri-i=ii%:#1,, •. X r.Si•. v.r. •i .J 1. .t:: (�.� yT�s�- �{, r:�• : .•l�"i::%:i}i..J.Y. ::i• '•'i:?ii•%-..--,.....----,,,,,,,,,,,-,-----:,,,,v,,,,,,,,,..,,,,..;-:,- {i:•:J.•,i•.J.vJ:/.. .r! J...J:'• � •�:/ i .•f, ",Y :i:i,':.::r: :•i -i :r.. :�: :•t v::::r: .r_•:.. .'1���.••'r... ry. '����:!• rr: ./.l.,t J.r::r:r- :::q..:: :%i:: vl:: ii• rrr,li• :•r: :rr•.Ir:- :fl.. :!: •%-: ,.:':i': {1%I .{r!-. 'I:•i:. .-.i r:r.:./ J.r:r :•✓. .•t.. .Jr ./�./�/ .!':A'r:..!.../'rI 'J'i•J .� 1J• .1/.. 'J.. :!f. .J.•J. 1.;.!J. .I.. • Jr.. ..! ./.._•• _r i'i:•�lir •i- :ir.. •F::./,r: :>.•' Y• ,r:=!.':J/:•%': ;f: :Y' ••t• .'1!:•J•:•:. :•r. I /.=r:l'Y.�:•::• rl:.,f.•:.is I. .!r.. W r.-::i:. =i'r. "i!%irr JF•!' .�IJrr•. !;%'+':' r:rr:r.. .,:•::i:}%:, :r:•�:• },:::: : .rf!:L F{• •l.{.J./'}•:r•i••,til lV.:r. : .tiJi •:f .hr,:': .ff...r r Ifr, .If ..rr}i:r. '•;• !. i• { .. r. :{. •;'. .,L✓..• .r. f::..ir•.r f r}'•�i:::!•;':S;r.i.. i::. .{• ,r.r.- rs:;:!r!ty! , !, 1r::r":..�. '�����•: ?.T'T..7r T5+1'!V•Y'.•' :N. : •. � (�,.��j�:� r:.:`.f•. '•T� .CI!1- :•ir=.:%:Y :v::JJJ:,i•L...rJ.::•!.�•:: Y v•J• J.. _ :r..%i !••yr :Jr1J:r.v.•:•L:i : ::::,.::::::::;::E:::::•:::::::%;:..,,, r 'i}•.. .Fn .Jr:::. .:::::{•i.r.:r..l.•:{::-::::.:J::r.•:r.•:r.•. .f-: .!. .�� Jr.J.:�r :':•% . r: :f J..r..4:•';'.:.. :•.. :.•.•_ .r. .}: •:' _ :•:/.-: :l:'•.1/.. rY ,:: Jr•.. :i 'r: ilitil v:' J r r•_•. r •• ti!. :. at• •. �.tom':•.:. - .r. - - .'Y: - r.t. }:•. .{.,. t .Z'•-{. ♦..•...v...K-:{'Y'.?:i r:i:'r=7t?} J.�: •r.• •'S•• .iL. z:. '..:,0,!.....M::..?:.,,-,:d:::::::--.Mi• ::iii::.81„,,,Lfq::0Ai•;Lt• .ii'.::::.amraffiii rr. :: v r: :%r����:•i.r.�•.. ::i:t -r::::::: is•..r( :-f}�: - .J::•rN/: .v. .Y• l Y: :ti- .J• .Y J. ��:a:'� ::,��.�:�d77�6.�sRR-a�'�:• •:��X S�E� .rm0?:�r: c�. :::::og-i::::::::::k..-14:0I.:.11.,-'1:,., .1.15m,,,,, J• r• .4} L5' v: :.: _ to t. :I:'.,':::'r-•.:•:: �.I: "11'i:•:• .:'.�.•::.':.-. Jf:• ,:: ;i:i j • • r i':i. iii:•;:. rt �'}� �/�y� r: Ji :m:.: :::.:-,;:::::i:i:.:.:i,:.iii..:-:i:::::. ff:,:. :::::.:,i,:.i-:.:i•i ;:ef.i;::::,:.:.--;.:-..miii.:::::i::: .:?:.:-:m:.:::.: -::..::.::::,-,E..::_,::::i,.:i-:::i::.:;?::i::ii.:-...; -:::.:ii:aii.-:1:,-.:;. t ':' Y:•• '•!• 1Y• 1/' . :f:,Y: .•!:J:Jr.•.•J.• 'r :.::': !:,. r r,r.�P!.•rr-:!:I▪ .. 1•::.:•:.:!'::.':!.•."• J '!.. /.!':::.•:•: !v. r. .:.i1{ .1i:4YY. :�:t;.: r: .r: :i..yi }i! :{. :J:::i., :.... .!. �:. ,::. ,f: .f. v :r•1: •J.•.•.• .r .•r:f. 'rrr: .i• r'.J. �r..:r J,y,. r,. •!•:: ./ •-v••.:J: :•:••":t r. ':ii.. •J.•::. .::�J. i.•::•�•::"i_ ::v..,r:!:::}::.;:••i J:!.nL•.!. fir.•:.r.i.•:rti•�:: ••••:• r.• :•:•{r! ;.}.•r/. �• !•'.!...f•.:s% ::r ri.J,Y. .L:�•:•':/.>` :;:;i!.•:.::...,..x:l... /.::rr:. .{.!:; .Jr••y:.i r::N:i v::•:. •:-. .,.:-,-;:i:::1::,::::::::: ::::::,:-...:.-....-,-, -- ..-. r• •.{ _:::::::;::.:.:,:-:::E::::::,,,,::,,...:,:::-,--::::.i:ii,::-::-*,:::::::::.:1::::?.:.:-:*:::::::::,::::::::.:.:,......,....,„--.--..... 'v required to identify and submit to the NPDES permitting authority the following information: •The BMPs that will be implemented; •The measurable goals for the minimum control measures; •The month and year in which each BMP will be started and completed,or the frequency of action if it is ongoing;and •The persons}responsible for implementing or coordinating the storm water management program. This information could be submitted Niof Intent(NOH if the community wishes to apply unittederin aa generaotlce permit, or on an individual application if the community or facility seeks an individual permit. If a community wants to propose other controls within its permit rather than the Six Minimum Control Measures, the rule provides an alternative application process. EPA is not specifying NOI requirements for operators of construction sites of less than five acres applying for coverage under a general permit. While EPA recognizes the benefit of NOIs which allow for better outreach and dissemination of informationfederal regulators are sensitive to the burden being placed on the—re gulated community and on the NPDES regulators. Therefore,it is up to the NPDES permitting authority to determine whether it will require NOI submission for construction :� sites disturbing less than five acres. (r 1 19 1 The application form is reviewed by the permit writer who then prepares a draft permit. Once the draft is ready,it is sent to the applicant and published in order to notify the general public of the proposed permitting activity. The permit writer then accepts comments on the draft permit from all interested persons. Revisions are then made based on comments received,and the permis is issued final. What Do Regulated Communities Have to Do On an Ongoing Basis? Under the Phase II rule,regulated communities must conduct periodic evaluations and assessments of their storm water management practices,maintain records, and prepare required reports. Evaluation and Record Reporting Assessment Keeping Requirements Requirements Requirements • Evaluate program • Keep records required by • Submit annual reports to the compliance the NPDES permitting permitting authority for the 1st • Evaluate the authority for at least permit term. appropriateness of three years. • In subsequent terms,submit identified BMPs • Submit the records when reports in years two and four,or • Evaluate progress toward requested by the more frequently as required achieving measurable permitting authority. • Reports should include: goals. • Make your records and • Status of permit condition The NPDES permitting stormwater management compliance authority may determine plan accessible to the • Appropriateness of monitoring requirements public during regular identified BMPs appropriate to your working ours. • Progress toward achieving watershed. EPA encourages • A reasonable copying measurable goals for each participation in a group fee may be charged. measure monitoring project. • Advance notice of up • Results of data collected and to two days for analyzed during the copying may be reporting period requested. • A summary of the activities that will take place during the next reporting period • Any changes in measurable -- op, goals 20 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: April 12, 2000 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL FROM: Brent Sinclair, AICP, Community Development Director SUBJECT: "Snapshot of Today for a Vision of Tomorrow" SUMMARY: Our Planning and Zoning staff will provide a full audio and visualresentation o p four world as seen through the eyes of Orthophotography. What is it? Why is it important to us now and in the future? In 1998 PAG contracted with local jurisdictions to obtain high qualityorthophotos g p os covering 578 miles of urbanized area in Pima County. Orthophotos are high resolution images of the surface ce of the earth and provide extensive data in photographic (hard copy) form and digital form. Such data are useful for numerous studies including: land use, transportation, recreation and open space, topographic, h drolo p Mhydrology, vegetation, air quality, etc. In fact, this data is useful in just about every aspect of our daily routine. It is the essential ingredient for building a successful geographic information system (GIS). Using orthophotos as a base map, staff will provide a demonstration showinghow information nmatron is layered to form a GIS. We will also discuss the importance of obtaining and maintaining accurate data once a GIS has been established. c&' Community Development Director 'd. //II Town Manage