Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Packets - Council Packets (1503)
Oro Valley Mayor and Town Councilmembers Mr. Bayer Vella, AICP Town of Oro Valley Planning Manager 11000 N. La Canada Dr. Oro Valley, AZ 85737 Dear Honorable Mayor, Vice Mayor, Councilmembers, and Mr. Vella I'm writing once again to urge you to vote in favor of the Silverhawke Block 5 General Plan and Amendment rezoning C-1 to R-6 to allow for the residential development of Casitas. I understand that many of you ran on a platform of minimal development. Having grown up in Tucson and raising my children in Oro Valley, I share the desire to preserve as much of our Sonoran Desert as possible. It is a truly unique and special environment. I have had the privilege of calling the Tucson area home for over 40 years. It is out of my love for our environment that I am compelled to write you. Like you, in my experience, I have learned to balance my idealism with pragmatism. 20 years ago, in choosing such a desirable place like our one of kind Oro Valley to call home, I realized growth is inevitable. As much as I hoped we could stay the size we were 20 years ago, growth eventually wins. However, there are moments when an opportunity arises to choose how we grow. With the guidance from our town government and input from the community, the landowner is proposing a change of land use that is offering our town a unique opportunity to choose a development that is very much to the benefit of the existing community. Casitas are a more environmentally sensitive and attractive use of the land than an office, retail center or research and development facility. These uses of the land which is what the land is currently zoned for keeps a 25' or 2 story height limit. Large trucks, waste, and odor are not an attractive use of the land for the existing neighborhoods. A unique 1 story residential offering is a clear and much better choice for our community and environment. As an Oro Valley voter and resident of Catalina Shadows, a neighborhood which is directly impacted by the proposal I request that approve of the Silverhawke Block 5 General Plan and Amendment rezoning C-1 to R-6 to allow for the residential development of Casitas Stine, Michelle From: Randall, Diana Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 20214:29 PM To: Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael Subject: FW: Failure Notice Please see below for constituent comments. Sincerely, Diana Randall Executive Assistant Town Manager, Mayor and Council From: c Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 20219:25 AM To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov> Subject: Fw: Failure Notice I have a question as to what is occurring with the property at 1 st and Tangerine. I saw the road sign regarding the meeting back in December, so I tuned into the Zoom meeting at that time. During that meeting, there was some kind of technical issue and a matter had to be revisited at a later time. I then heard that the votes did not qualify for rezoning of this property to allow for residential. I saw on Nextdoor that it appears it has come back again. This is the first that I have heard of this. If it was already decided why is it being discussed again? I would hope that whatever is decided would fit in with the long-standing plan of the town, would not cram a lot of dwellings in a small space and would consider the natural beauty of that area. Furthermore, the noise from traffic on Tangerine has become incredibly loud in a short amount of time, enough to wake a person from a deep sleep within the house. Also, what is the best method forgetting notifications for upcoming meetings. Thank you Louisa Osborne ----- Forwarded Message ----- From To: Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2021, 05:57:54 AM EST Subject: Failure Notice Sorry, we were unable to deliver your message to the following address <cou ncil C oroval levaz.com>: Unable to deliver message after multiple retries, giving up. --- Below this line is a copy of the message. I have a question as to what is occurring with the property at 1 st and Tangerine. I saw the road sign regarding the meeting back in December, so I tuned into the Zoom meeting at that time. During that meeting, there was some kind of technical issue and the issue of rezoning had to be revisited at a later time. I then heard that the votes did not qualify for rezoning of this property to allow for residential. Today on Nextdoor it appears it has come back again. This is the first that I have heard of this. If it was already decided why is it being discussed again? I would hope that whatever is decided would fit in with the long-standing plan of the town, would not cram a lot of dwellings in a small space and would consider the natural beauty of that area. Also, the noise from traffic on Tangerine has become incredibly loud in a short amount of time, enough to wake a person from a deep sleep within the house. Rezoning would be quite a shift from the initial plan for this property and I am not sure the community has had the time or insight to give you it's pulse regarding this matter. Louisa Osborne February 2, 2021 Oro Valley Mayor and Town Councilmembers Mr. Bayer Vella, AICP Town of Oro Valley Planning Manager 11000 N. La Canada Dr. Oro Valley, AZ 85737 Dear Mr. Mayor, Councibnembers, and Mr. Vella, My family has lived in Oro Valley since 1994, and we absolutely love our community. My wife and I raised both of our kids here through Wilson K-8 and Ironwood Ridge High School. We have friends who are business owners in Oro Valley, our church homes are in town, and I work in the town as well. For both my wife and I, we have lived in Oro Valley longer than any other place in our lives, so this is without a doubt our home. I am familiar with the project and rezoning proposal around the Silverhawk development near Tangerine and 1st Ave. and believe that rezoning the area from C-1 to R-6 would be beneficial for the neighborhoods surrounding it and the community as a whole. Given the amount of unoccupied commercial properties in that general vicinity and the proximity to other residential areas, I support the plan to increase residential housing at that location. We have known many people through the years who would love to call Oro Valley home but have not been ready to settle into one of the larger houses that are prevalent in the town. By providing a smaller and more intimate community setting, I believe we will bring additional young professionals into the town that will ultimately support our local businesses and help our community grow well. I encourage you to consider the immediate and long-term benefits of rezoning this property. I am fortunate to have the opportunity to live and work in this beautiful community and look forward to continuing that for many years to come. Thank you for your consideration and leadership. Stine, Michelle From: Randall, Diana Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 20214:47 PM To: Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael Subject: FW: Stop the needless building and destruction of Oro Valley Please see below for constituent comments Sincerely, Diana Randall Executive Assistant Town Manager, Mayor and Council From: Chance Hanusek Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 20214:39 PM To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov> Subject: Stop the needless building and destruction of Oro Valley Please, with all the talk of Green and carbon footprint and adequate housing in a Town (not a city) we do not need additional construction. Keep Oro Valley QUAINT and simple. Focus on improving existing areas that are neglected and show signs of blight. Do not approve additional apartment construction. Many, many apartments have been built up and down Oracle. How long has the property where Sports Authority has been vacant and only with season tenants?! Halloween and other temp occupancy just does not cut it. How long was the sporting good store space at LaCanada and Lambert vacant? Lots of empty plazas up and down Thornydale in Marana. Do you want Oro Valley to turn into Marana with lots of empty units -- commercial or otherwise? The appeal and charm is being lost and has significantly eroded over time. Had I known this I would have bought in Catalina or Oracle! Use and repurpose what exists and have areas of commercial, residential low density and middle density. If you want to do apartments then put them by the Walmart and closer to Oracle, not Safeway. Not Rancho Vistoso. First you do apartments then car washes and car repair shops. The area is turning into a total hodge-podge and is not true to the original character. If you want to keep people living, coming and spending then you need to make it attractive. The distinctiveness and taste is being lost so it is no different than any other place. An example of poor planning (monstrous school on LaCanada -too close to the road and eyesore playground in front). Looks like an office building - no plantings. Nice touch was the LaCanada and Moore rotary -- classy. Distinctive. Please refrain from changing the historic look and feel and keep the development around the Fry's (Oracle) and Walmart. Thankyou! Mr. and Mrs. C Hanusek Oro Valley Stine, Michelle From: Randall, Diana Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 3:16 PM To: Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael Subject: FW: Pusch Ridge golf course Good afternoon, Please see below for constituent comments. Sincerely, Diana Randall Executive Assistant Town Manager, Mayor and Council -----Original Message ----- From: Jerry Huf' ' Sent: Monday, February 1, 20212:47 PM To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>; Jacobs, Mary <mjacobs@orovalleyaz.gov> Subject: Pusch Ridge golf course Oro Valley council members, Mary Jacobs, Kristi-Trajan, The city council' lack of action regarding Pusch Ridge golf course is creating an eyesore and devaluing our homes. Representatives from the HOA have put forth a reasonable solution for keeping the golf course open, yet there has not been a reasonable response from the city. I voted to increase my taxes so that all the golf courses would remain open. Why is it that the 36 hole course is being supported, but Pusch Ridge is closed?I have always supported play fields, the swimming pool, tennis courts and all the other recreational activities, but do not use them. I need the city to use the money that was promised for Pusch Ridge golf course to support my peculiar interest. Jerry Huff Oro Valley A2 85704 Sent from my iPad Stine, Michelle From: Randall, Diana Sent: Monday, January 25, 2021 8:17 AM To: Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael Subject: FW: Keep the Pusch Ridge Golf Course as it was originally intended Attachments: Pusch Ridge Golf Course Arguments rev.docx Good morning, Please see below and attached for constituent comments. Sincerely, Diana Randall Executive Assistant Town Manager, Mayor and Council -----Original Message ----- From: Saul Rosenberg _ _ Sent: Saturday, January 23, 20217:53 PM To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>; Jacobs, Mary <mjacobs @orovaIleyaz.gov>; Diaz-Trahan, Kristy <kdiaz- tra ha n @orova I leyaz.gov> Subject: Keep the Pusch Ridge Golf Course as it was originally intended I am absolutely in favor for the gold course to remain as it was originally developed for all the reasons stated in the attachment. Even if the town wanted to use the space for some recreational use other than what it was originally intended, the space is woefully inadequate in width to be used for anything other than a golf course. Sincerely, Saul H Rosenberg, PhD Oro Valley, 85704 Financial Comparisons and Implications for Pusch Ridge Golf Facility Use These are preliminary estimates based upon information received from the town staff. The golf estimates use the some operating strategy in place prior to its closure. The open space estimates are based upon the town manager's overall initial estimate of $125,000. For this purpose, we prorated open space expenses vs. the golf plan. Pusch Ridge Golf Pusch Ridge Open Space Variance Users (Golfers vs. walkers) 5000 1500 (3500) Average Green Fee $27.00 Revenues Golf Play $135,000 Merchandise $2,100 F&B $1,800 Total Revenues $138,900 $0 ($138,900) Expenses Labor $107,000 $37,000 Maintenance $34,000 $15,000 Operations $46,600 $3,000 Water/ Utilities $156,000 $70,000 Other $2,000 $0 Total Expenses $345,600 $125,000 ($220,600) (Indigo Golf Estimate for 6 months of operations) (Town Manager Overall Operational Cost Estimate before capital transformational investment) Net Income (Loss) ($206,700) ($125,000) ($81,700) Subsidies to offset losses HOA Support $34,000 $0 EI Conquistador Resort Support (couldbeas much as $40,000 annually starting in 2023) $0 .5% Tax Contribution (this represents between 5% and 7% of tax collected while representing about 15% of the facilities the tax is intended to support) $172,700 $125,000 ($47,700 Total Subsidies Required $206,700 $125,000 ($81,700) Net Cost to Town per User $34.54 $83.33 $48.79 Town Savings by closing golf before considering any Resort subsidy contribution, lost future tax income and water revenues, lost marketing value and before investing capital to make it open space. $47,700 Is this really worth it to disrupt 227 homeowners and lase a beautiful town amenity? Pusch Ridge Golf Course Arguments Reasons to Restore Golf Reasons against Open Space Golf Demand is Up / Income opportunity — at a recent No real net savings to the town / All cost, no revenues — when factoring in lost tax revenues from town council meeting it was noted that the municipal courses (without Pusch) are up 22% golfers vs. walkers there is no difference in costs. Increased interest in 9-hole Play — all the major golf Cost of transformation (S3.5MM) — the town manager trade journals proclaim renewed interest in 9-hole play— has indicated it could cost this much just for a minimal time for play, need to socialize, families, youth, safe transformation with no real economic or recreational socialization, costs are all reasons for the increase. benefit to town residents and no investment payback. Potential for youth golf, charity events, family golf Negative impact on surrounding landscape — because use — to offset demand on the I8-hole courses, PR is much of it has depended upon golf course irrigation for ideal for less formal golf events and uses. over 30 years, without water it is dying and could become afire and drainage hazard. Tax income benefit to the town — golfers pay for the Reduces revenues to Oro Valley Water — water cost privilege to play, they also buy merchandise and for the golf operation is revenues to the town. Without refreshments and many stay in hotels significantly more it income will have to come from other sources, than walkers on an open space. including increased rates. Continuation of marketing - The resort OV, Tucson, No specific need for Open Space — no one is and realtors continue to feature the green fairways advocating for additional open space in this part of town against the dramatic Pusch Peak to drive business to Oro vs. areas north of Tangerine. Only purpose would be an Valley. This property is a valuable town asset. attempt to cut costs. A unique and recognized golf course - PR is golf course Potential reduced assessed and market values of homes and resort — the permanent closure of PR to golf ground, with changes in elevation and immediate proximity to Pusch Ridge, it is special and like no other and minimal transformation to a usable open space will golf property in southern AZ, as recognized by many golf impact the assessed valuations of over $100,000,000 in review sites and AZ golf magazine. For most of the 30- real estate and therefore, property taxes generated. In plus years of operation, Pusch Golf was successful. The today's robust market valuations are up, but not to the town never gave it a chance when the town took over extent homes in the rest of Oro Valley. operations, by limiting hours and closing on Mondays, Potentially greater stormwater runoff risks — the and failing to promote; a 9-hole course excels when rounds can be played early and late; such was never slope and changes in ground cover will increase risks of offered. The successful status quo should not be uncontrolled runoff into adjacent homes and washes. abandoned. Manageable costs of operation — Projections from the Insufficient Public Parking — this facility weaves town show operating costs are within range of tax through neighborhoods on private roads. New parking passed to support continued operations and would need to be built and no parking signs installed at maintenance of the course. Even though the facility additional expense to the town. represents 15-20% of the assets, less than 10% of the tax is needed to offset any operating deficits. Opportunity to reduce turf to save water — the current Control over unauthorized uses, i.e. dogs off leash — design reflects the 1980's. Homeowners have indicated the natural of the current conditions attracts off-leash they would consider adopting and funding xeriscaping pet activities, further eroding the fairways and disrupting efforts to reduce water requirements on the course. natural wildlife migrations. Friends of Pusch Golf Opportunity— unlike with open Current cart path not in acceptable walking condition and it runs too close to homes — the path is unsafe to space there is interest among individual homeowners to in financially support continued operations. walk on and would need to be repositioned at a significant cost to the town. Willingness of individual homeowners advance Increased Safety and Security Concerns for Residents purchase multi-play pack plans — to enhance play and — much of the space is open directly to homeowner yards cash flow. with no restricted access or lighting. kulfillment of commitment to Golf members — Towns track record maintain non-natural open spaces — OV has limited resources and skills maintaining memberships were sold to use 3 distinct golf course options. No discounts have been offered with PR closure. non-natural 'passive recreational use"facilities. Competitive Benefit of Golf Adjacent to Resort — Changes in wildlife patterns — If the pond is removed, it assuming OV annexes Westward Look, without PR, the will displace waterfowl and no longer be a water source only two major resorts in greater Tucson area without for other wildlife. on-site golf will be in Oro Valley. Homeowners implied contract to be on a golf course No Real Benefit to the resort — whether played or not — our homes were built specifically as vacation homes, the appeal of the resort is in part reinforced by the named and linked to a golf resort. CC&R and easements visuals of green fairways surrounding the resort. Open refer to golf access. space with no grass will not project the some image. Precedent established with Canada Hills HOAs to Open space plan will require HSL Approval — the sales agreement implies acceptable standards for use if not a support continued golf — HOAs have offered the town financial support proportionate to what OV accepted from golf course. The town is required to do more than simply Canada Hills HOAs. close and maintain it in its current state. Productive use of town-owned assets — The existing infrastructure includes retail and maintenance buildings, cart paths, signs, tee boxes, greens, and a golf-intended irrigation system that would be of little value and an expense to the town if course is permanently closed. Here are the email addresses for the town council members. You can either communicate individually or collectively at the council@orovallevaz.gov address. Mayor Winfield Email: jAmfield@o allevaz.gov Vice Mayor Barrett Email: mbarrett@orovallevaz.gov Councilmember Bohen Email: tbohen omNvallevaz.gov Councilmember Greene Email: hgreene@orovalleyaz.gov Councilmember Jones-Ivey Email: jjones-iveo royallevaz.gov Councilmember Nicolson Email: jnicolson@oroya tievaz.gov Councilmember Solomon Email: ssolomonna orovallevaz.gov The councilmembers can be reached as a group by utilizing the email address council@g[gyalieyaz.gov We also suggest sending additional concerns directly to the town manager, Mary Jacobs at miacobs@orovallevaz.gov and the director of parks and recreation, Kristi Diaz-Trahan at kdiaz- trahan@orovallevaz.gov. They are the two staff members responsible for the current condition of the course. Stine, Michelle From: Randall, Diana Sent: Friday, January 29, 2021 9:34 AM To: Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael Subject: FW: Pusch Ridge Golf Property Good morning, Please see below for constituent comments. Sincerely, Diana Randall Executive Assistant Town Manager, Mayor and Council From: Sent: Friday, January 29, 20219:23 AM To: Winfield, Joe <jwinfield@orovalleyaz.gov>; brodman@orovalleyaz.gov; Jones -Ivey, Joyce <jjones- ivey@orovalleyaz.gov>; ssoloman@orovalleyaz.gov; Barrett, Melanie <mbarrett@orovalleyaz.gov>; Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>; tbohen@orovalley.az.gov; hgreene@orovalley.az.gov; Nicolson, Josh <jnicolson @orovalleyaz.gov> Subject: Pusch Ridge Golf Property Dear Mayor, Council Members and Town Manager I am a homeowner in the Hilton EI Conquistador Patio Homes development and my house borders the #5 fairway. As a full-time resident and taxpayer, I think I am entitled to say that the town is truly negligent in it's responsibility to maintain town -owned property. The Pusch Ridge land is in deplorable condition and a blight on the town. I can appreciate that the future use of the property is under consideration, but in the meantime, some basic maintenance is necessary. Thank you for your attention to the matter. As for the longer term use of the property, I am convinced that returning it to a 9 hole golf course is a wise move. It is an exceptional site and layout, and is truly a jewel in the Oro Valley crown. If the course is run properly, it will generate revenue that would significantly offset the costs associated with operation. Considering that any alternative use for the land will require major upfront costs and potentially large ongoing operating subsidies, this option is nowhere near as costly as one might think. With more optimal opening hours, proper pricing and good course marketing, the course could easily return to profitability or at worst, break-even. Reducing fairways to "target golf' standards would cut down on one of the largest costs - water use. Even if the income/expense gap is not reduced to zero, the town should still operate the Pusch Ridge Golf Course for the following reasons: 1. Few other community recreational facilities operate at a profit. Dog parks, soccer fields and most other recreational facilities generate zero revenue yet carry costs. 2. The costs to convert the property to a linear park or some other recreational facility will carry sizeable upfront costs and ongoing maintenance and water costs. 3. Golf play is up. Opening Pusch Ridge will meet the demand for more play 4. Adjacent HOAs are willing to contribute, though I personally think it is unfair that the town expects this additional support from taxpayers. Owners with property abutting other town owned recreational facilities don't have to contribute extra to the town to operate those facilities. 5. The town already raises money to support Pusch Ridge Golf via the tax surcharge levied when the properties were purchased. 6. Allowing the land to return to a more natural state will impact property values and hotel revenues, reducing the town's tax base. Thank you for serving our community. Please ensure that the condition of the Pusch Ridge land is promptly returned to a healthy and attractive condition, and consider this taxpayer's position regarding re -opening the golf course. Sincerely, Marianne Berlan Stine, Michelle From: Randall, Diana Sent: Friday, January 29, 2021 9:15 AM To: Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael; Sidles, Tobin; Hynd, Jessica Subject: FW: Pusch Ridge Golf Course Good morning, Please see below for constituent comments. Sincerely, Diana Randall Executive Assistant Town Manager, Mayor and Council From: Keith Holm Sent: Friday, January 29, 20219:05 AM To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov> Subject: Pusch Ridge Golf Course January 29, 2021 Oro Valley Council Members My name is Keith Holm, I reside at Oro Valley. I moved into my townhome on December 4, 2020. My property backs up to the pond on the course. Not being from this area when I purchased my home, my assumption was that the Pusch Ridge Golf Course had been closed for the season or closed because of the pandemic. My expectation was that the course would reopen in the spring. Had I known that there was a possibility that the course would not reopen, I would never have purchased my home at the premium price I paid for it. I fully intend to find out how the permanent closure of the course will impact the value of my property. If it is as I expect, the City may find itself embroiled in legal action by many of us, to recover our loss of property values. I saw breathtaking photographs of how the course once looked. It was why I bought here. This course is an incredible asset to our community. I strongly urge Council members to do the right thing and reopen the course. I am not a golfer. I chose to purchase here because of the views of the course and of my enjoyment of watching those who do enjoy the game, play the game. Even though I don't play, I'd be willing to purchase one or more advance multi -play pack plans to enhance initial cash flow to help reopen the course. I fully support our HOA's offer to subsidize the operations of the course. In fact, I'd be willing to increase my contribution over and above what the HOA has proposed. Many of us in the area are retired with spare time on our hands. In addition to my financial contribution, I'd be happy to volunteer in some capacity to lower the personnel cost of the course operation. In a former life I managed a 12,000 member trade association so I'm sure some of my experience could be put to good use. You have been provided with many reasons to reopen the course. Please review them carefully without bias. Put yourselves into the shoes of the homeowners in the area. Imagine the horrible impact of closure. I have a personal distain for lawyers, but, if your decision is to convert the course to "passive recreational use," I would support legal action to restore what will have been taken away from residents, community members, and the entire area. Restore the course. It's the right thing to do. Respectfully, Keith O. Holm Oro Valley, AZ 85704 Stine, Michelle From: Randall, Diana Sent: Friday, January 29, 2021 8:47 AM To: Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael Subject: FW: Pusch Ridge Golf Course deliberations Good morning, Please see below for constituent comments. Sincerely, Diana Randall Executive Assistant Town Manager, Mayor and Council -----Original Message ----- From: Paul Sedon Sent: Thursday, January 28, 20216:07 PM To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>; Jacobs, Mary <mjacobs@orovalleyaz.gov> Subject: Pusch Ridge Golf Course deliberations Hello all, My name is Paul Sedon, I am the president of the Shadows of the Ridge HOA which are the patio homes located directly east of the resort. I would like to take this opportunity to highlight a few facts regarding this pending decision compiled from previous distributed reports/information. Additionally, I'd like to extend my appreciation to the mayor, to the council, and to Mary Jacobs for affording us the opportunity to participate in the ensuing discussions. * The Hilton EI Conquistador resort contributes approximately $1.5/2 million dollars annually to the Oro Valley tax revenue; * The surrounding Pusch Ridge Golf course property values encompass a total of nearly $100 million dollars ($30 million/HSL; $70 million/home values); *A renewed 3-5 year golf course commitment from Oro Valley would mitigate any decreased tax revenues resulting from lower property values. In the interim, hopefully, a COVID-19 recovery may afford the renegotiation of a lease with HSL; *The golf play at the La Canada/EI Conquistador courses have far exceeded the mayor and council expectations due to the sport's popularity given the COVID-19 restrictions, an on-going trend; *The Pusch Ridge 9 -hole golf course presents an extremely unique opportunity for those with a limited timeframe in addition to its iconic setting; *Given the current transformation of both the Vistoso and the Rooney Ranch property to open space, would it not be redundant to also transition the Pusch Ridge Golf course to the same? As an alternative, perhaps it would be beneficial to renew our golf course as such in the interim, to readdress/postpone the decision until the COVID-19 situation has improved? Th nk you all for your attention and consideration, Paul Sedon Sent from my Wad Stine, Michelle From: Randall, Diana Sent: Friday, January 29, 2021 3:10 PM To: Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael Subject: FW: Pusch Ridge Golf Future Good afternoon, Please see below for constituent comments. Sincerely, Diana Randall Executive Assistant Town Manager, Mayor and Council From: Bruce DaCosta Sent: Friday, January 29, 20212:33 PM To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>; Jacobs, Mary <mjacobs@orovalleyaz.gov> Cc: Bruce DaCostz Subject: Pusch Ridge Golf Future Good Afternoon, Good Afternoon, My partner and I purchased our patio home at in June of 2019. Having lived in Tucson from 1975 to 1980 while attending graduate school, we were excited to return to the wonderful setting of Oro Valley. When we purchased our home on the eighth hole of the Pusch Ridge golf course we were unaware of the ongoing controversy of the city's purchase of the golf courses. To our dismay we find the golf course in the back of our home is in complete dis-repair and the trees are stressed due to lack of water lack of maintenance by the City. I have reviewed the City's financial reports, met with fellow homeowners, attended town council meetings and to me it seems that those of us in the EI Conquistador Hotel area are being punished for the decisions of a previous town council to purchase the properties while imposing -- a dedicated sales tax to support their operation. Furthermore, the City has failed to apportion the revenues generated from the sales tax proportionally to all the golf course areas. This has led to the lack of maintenance and demise of trees and green belt areas at Pusch Ridge. To be clear, I am not a golfer but was drawn to the patio home area for tennis, pickleball and the amazing views. However, looking out the back of my property presents a travesty compared to what motivated us to purchase here in 2019. My understanding is tax dollars are being collected to support all the assets purchased. To date, the assets associated with the Pusch Ridge golf course have sadly been ignored at the expense of the homeowners that live here. Others, more knowledgeable than I on the financials of running the Pusch Ridge course, can speak to the value it brings to our community. I feel confident in speaking as an Oro Valley resident and homeowner that the irresponsible 'abandonment' of this complex neither serves the homeowners, the Hilton Complex as a business nor the City of Oro Valley. I would expect the City would like to present a thriving, positive image to those who in the future might choose to make it their home. I would ask to the City to reconsider its allocation of resources in support of the Pusch Ridge — EI Conquistador community. It is essential to maintain this asset to ensure the trees, the green belt areas, home owners property values and the natural habitat are maintained. Thank you for your consideration. Bruce J. DaCosta Stine, Michelle From: Randall, Diana Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 8:03 AM To: Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael Subject: FW: Pusch Ridge Golf Course Good morning, Please see below for constituent comments. Sincerely, Diana Randall Executive Assistant Town Manager, Mayor and Council From: Judy Smith ' - Sent: Saturday, January 30, 20215:53 PM To: Judy Smith <judy@2jsmith.com>; ccornelison@orovalley.gov; Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>; mjacobs@orovalley.gov Subject: Pusch Ridge Golf Course To Oro Valley City Officials: Imagine: *That New York City stops maintaining Central Park after a group of citizens who live in Queens complain that they don't utilize the park. *That San Antonio closes the River Walk, rationalizing that, although the city does not have a water shortage, Texas is an and state. *That Anaheim shuts down Disney Land, because negotiating with Disney is complicated. Now imagine that you own: *The only winery in Napa Valley, or *The only horse farm in Lexington, or *The only art gallery in Santa Fe. Oro Valley owns the only nine -hole golf course in this part of the Arizona, one of the golfing capitals of the world. Prior to its lamentable neglect, Pusch Ridge Golf Course was universally described in glowing terms for its beauty and the pleasure of golfing it. It has been called "the best kept secret in Arizona Golf." It's time for Oro Valley city leaders to appreciate Pusch Ridge Golf Course for the unique asset that it is. It's time to return Pusch Ridge to its former glory, to preserve, protect and promote it. Imagine letting all golfers in on "the best kept secret in Arizona golf." Imagine the many ways that maintaining Pusch Ridge will benefit the City of Oro Valley. Respectfully yours, Judith R. Smith Oro Valley homeowner and resident Stine, Michelle From: Randall, Diana Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 8:05 AM To: Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael Subject: FW: Pusch Ridge golf course Good morning, Please see below for constituent comments. Sincerely, Diana Randall Executive Assistant Town Manager, Mayor and Council From: Peter Bell Sent: Sunday, January 31, 202112:44 PM To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov> Subject: Pusch Ridge golf course To: Council member of Oro Valley From: Peter Bell and Sharon Bottorff Regarding: Pusch Ridge Golf Course We are writing to express our deep concerns regarding the status of the Pusch Ridge golf course. There appears to be broad agreement that the current status of the course is unacceptable to the home owners, residents and political leadership of Oro Valley. The residents believe that the city made an agreement to subsidize the cost of maintaining the course when they imposed a 1/2 cent sales tax. It was our understanding that these funds were to be used for the recreation center and two golf courses on La Canada Drive, and the nine hole golf course at Pusch Ridge. When public trust in government is so low as it is today it is disappointing that the city would choose to back out of their agreement and leave the home owners of Pusch Ridge with the situation we now face. Further, we understand that Tony D'Angelo has presented the city with a plan for operating the golf course that includes the HOA's surrounding Pusch Ridge contributing funds for the ongoing upkeep of the golf course. As you no doubt are aware, nine hole golf courses are an important amenity that many seniors increasingly value. There are numerous other reasons to reconsider your decision including the cost and the need for more open space in Oro Valley, the impact on tax revenues from the EI Conquistador resort and the environmental impacts of your decision. The residents of Pusch Ridge want a workable solution for all involved. It is our hope that this issue can be resolved without the cost of needless litigation. Sincerely, Peter Bell and Sharon Bottorff Peter Bell Stine, Michelle From: Randall, Diana Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 10:31 AM To: Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael Subject: FW: Deliberations on the Future of Pusch Ridge Golf Course Attachments: Why Not Pusch Ridge .... docx Good morning, Please see below and attached for constituent comments. Sincerely, Diana Randall Executive Assistant Town Manager, Mayor and Council From: Tim Bondl Sent: Monday, February 1, 202110:27 AM To: Town Council <council@orovaIleyaz.gov>; Jacobs, Mary <mjacobs@orovalleyaz.gov>; Diaz-Trahan, Kristy <kdiaz- tra ha n @ orova Ileyaz.gov> Subject: Deliberations on the Future of Pusch Ridge Golf Course To the Oro Valley Council and Staff: This is the first time you have heard from me, a homeowner in the EI Conquistador Patio Homes neighborhood. I recognize that most, if not all, members were elected based on a passionate belief that the OV golf purchase a few years back was a mistake and vowed to get the city out of the golf course business. Work has been done, and accommodations made. Now, the Pusch Ridge golf course seems like the easiest remaining target to declare victory and move on. Oh, but life isn't quite as simple as a spreadsheet. I attach a portion of an article published in The Wall Street Journal over the weekend about Covid and golf. I'm sure you can locate the entire article, which went on talk about investment themes of a revitalized golfing environment. The attached excerpt is relevant because it talks to the value of an outdoor activity such as golf in a Covid world and beyond. Rounds of golf are up dramatically; broadened interest base, and an outdoor activity. Consider that Pusch Ridge is a 9 -hole course, and thus attractive to those who want to spend a short time playing golf, not the better part of the day. Oh, and did I mention the views and vistas that make this area of Oro Valley so attractive. Sometimes facts change; sometimes circumstances change the way we look at, and act on, facts. I believe this is one of those times. A properly structured financial relationship between all the parties affected by this magnificent piece of Oro Valley can result in the right outcome, given today's environment. Perhaps a functioning golf course wasn't the right answer 3 years ago; today, it is very much a logical, effective stewardship of an Oro Valley resource. Thank you for your consideration. Tim Bondy For Golf, Covid Is Even Better Than Tiger The socially distant sport got a shot in the arm from the pandemic, and demographic trends could take it to new heights Golf was just working its way out of the rough when the pandemic hit. After an initial shock last spring, the sport is poised for its best year since Tiger Woods was at the height of his popularity two decades ago. There is still plenty of green for investors to aim for. Rounds played in the U.S. fell by 8.5% in March and a whopping 42% in April compared with a year earlier, according to the National Golf Foundation, as many courses were closed. But the socially distanced nature of the sport led to a furious rebound. By last month, rounds played were 37% higher and up handsomely for the entire year, even with the spring lockdowns. Even though other parts of their business such as clubhouse dining remain depressed, golf courses find themselves in far better financial shape than a few years ago. Back in 2016, a quarter of public golf courses surveyed by the NGF said they were in "poor" or "very poor" financial condition—slightly worse than in the aftermath of the 2008-09 financial crisis. By last year, only 8% of public courses reported similar conditions. The proportion reporting that they were in "good" or "great' shape had doubled. Stine, Michelle From: Randall, Diana Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 9:20 AM To: Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael Subject: FW: Time for a Decision on Pusch Ridge Golf Attachments: Microsoft Word - TC appeal for Golf.docx.pdf Good morning, Please see below and attached for constituent comments. Sincerely, Diana Randall Executive Assistant Town Manager, Mayor and Council From: Anthony DAngelc Sent: Monday, February 1, 20219:09 AM To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov> Subject: Time for a Decision on Pusch Ridge Golf Members of the Oro Valley Town Council: Please consider the arguments presented in the attached document. After nearly 6 years of constant uncertainty, our homeowners deserve a decision and then prompt actions to correct the neglect of this once beautiful town asset. Respectfully, Tony D'Angelo Golf Chair EI Conquistador Resort Patio Homes Association To: Oro Valley Town Council Members Date: February 1, 2021 RE: Reconsideration of the viability of Pusch Ridge Golf As you know, the town manager convened three meetings with representatives of the three HOAs on the Pusch Ridge Golf Course and Omar Mireles, president of HSL Properties to discuss options for the course. This was per your motion passed at the November 18, 2020 town council meeting. During these meetings it was resolved that there was no practical path at this time for HSL to assume a lease on the property. Therefore, the responsibility for the facility remains with the town of Oro Valley. Our HOAs are advocating for the restoration and operation of the facility as a golf course and have offered financial support consistent with and proportionate to what the town accepted from the Canada Hills HOAs to continue operation of the 36 holes of golf adjacent to the community center. The town manager intends to present two options to the town council. While throughout this process, town staff has been responsive to most of our direct inquires, staff has never actively sought our input or opinion outside the three meetings. Please also understand that we will not see written options until the same day they are sent to you. In the meantime, current conditions of the course remains unacceptable and have become a serious blight to our neighborhoods. Option One is a plan to restore and operate golf on the Pusch Ridge facility. Again, our representatives have not participated in any discussions with what this may look like. We are restricted from talking directly to Indigo Golf and have been told they work for the "town" and cannot talk to the people living in the town. We have been given very limited numbers showing an anticipated loss of $205,000 per year and told the operating plan would be what it was prior to its closing — 6 months of operations, 6 days a week, limited hours of operation, limited carts for use, no marketing and no dedicated pro shop. Option Two will be an open space plan which we presume will comply with the conditions of the sale agreement between the town and HSL. Our representatives nor HSL have been asked for input as of yet into what this plan may entail. It has been made clear to us that this will not be a green space park. One way or another though, the open space option will require a capital investment by the town to transform the property—for what purpose? Where is the outcry for more open space in this part of town? What will happen to the existing infrastructure for golf? Will the marginal savings to the town offset the negative impacts to home values, town image, resort attractiveness? Is the savings worth the increased safety and security risks to our homeowners? Austerity seems to be the preferred strategy for this town when it comes to providing recreational amenities. Is there not more upside for visitors, youth, families and retirees on a nine -hole golf course than with a minimally maintained "passive recreational facility?" Is there no value to the talent and experience of homeowners willing to voluntarily invest time as well as money into making this a successful golf venue? We are prepared to offer our collective expertise in the form of an advisory committee relative to successfully marketing the course. Because we are not golf professionals and are not allowed to talk to the town's golf professionals, we then can only provide points of view from what is available in the public domain. What follows are some of the arguments we hope the town council considers before making a final decision with regard to golf. NGF Summary — July 10, 2017: EI Conquistador Golf & Tennis Assessment and Recommendations This report was prepared for the town of Oro Valley to consider the future of its 45 holes of public golf. What a difference three years makes in prognostication! Some of the "facts" presented at that time included: "The overall demand/supply balance for golf in the greater Tucson market is very unfavorable to golf courses. There are far fewer permanent households and resident golfers available to support each 18 holes of golf in the market, and as a result the golf courses in this area tend to host fewer rounds than average." "The City of Tucson's public golf courses are down 25% in rounds and 19% in revenue since 2008, and other public golf courses report similar reductions." Since this 2017 report, the city of Tucson Golf Courses have experienced a significant increase in play and improved financial performance. Oro Valley is experiencing a boon in housing development and population growth. The Vistoso Golf Course has permanently closed and homeowners are endorsing a conversion to town -maintained open space. On the town owned and operating courses, play is up 22% YOY. More people, fewer golf courses, renewed interest in golf, COVID-19, etc. While a lot has changed since this report was commissioned, simply one point stands out: "Outright closure, although perhaps the most economically beneficial decision, is not necessarily a "cheap" option, as there are costs to prepare the property appropriately and there may be additional contemporaneous impacts that have to be considered (property values, tax base, resort relations, etc.). Further study is recommended." Furthermore, published articles continues to validate the resurgence of golf and nine -hole play in particular. Forexample: From Fox Business—January 29, 2021: For golf, COVID is even better than Tiger. The socially distant sport got a shot in the arm from the pandemic, and demographic trends could take it to new heights ByJinjoo Lee, Spencer Jakab The Wall Street Journal "Rounds played in the U.S. fell by 8.5% in March and a whopping 42% in April compared with a year earlier, according to the National Golf Foundation, as many courses were closed. But the socially distanced nature of the sport led to a furious rebound. By last month, rounds played were 37% higher and up handsomely for the entire year, even with the spring lockdowns." "Back in 2016, a quarter of public golf courses surveyed by the NGF said they were in "poor" or "very poor" financial condition -- slightly worse than in the aftermath of the 2008-09 financial crisis. By last year, only 8% of public courses reported similar conditions. The proportion reporting that they were in "good" or "great" shape had doubled." "People aren't giving enough thought to how much of America is getting older, "says Mr. Konik. "Golf is the perfect sportfor that part of the population." "A more recent boost for the sport comes from younger professionals now working remotely.... But the really significant boost for the game might lie with younger, more casual players." AMOS — Nov 9, 2020: How the coronavirus pandemic helped fuel 2020's golf boom Jeff Tracy "By the numbers: More rounds: September saw a 25.5% increase in the number of rounds played year -over -year — the fifth straight month to surpass last year's totals." "The National Golf Foundation estimates the number of junior golfers could increase by 20% (500,000) by year's end, and new or lapsed golfers also increased 20% in H1, per Wash Post." R&A Newsletter—April 30, 2020: 9 -hole golf courses —the future of golf? "Golf operator, Troon Golf, has recently stated that it would like more 9 -hole courses developed to make the game more attractive and less time-consuming. In 2012, HSBC produced a report entitled, Golf's 2020 Vision — in which it stated the need for golf to be made more attractive for non -golfers, for families, women and schoolchildren; and that 9 -hole facilities are the future of golf.• quicker rounds and more family focused." "Golfers will argue that a 9 -hole course is not a full golf course and regard them as a limited challenge. However, if well designed with imaginative features and hazards, with two distinct tee -boxes per hole, there is the possibility of creating an 18 -hole course within a 9 -hole course. It may even be possible to create two greens per hole or, at least, much larger greens with many more pin positions. There are advantages that outweigh the disadvantages: if you play only nine holes it takes less time to play (speeding up play is a big issue for the international governing golf authorities), it's less tiring for children and older people and less expensive for a green fee." "For the environment less land is required, therefore, less intensively maintained grass, less fertilizer, less water for irrigation; sustainably, it makes good economic and environmental sense to develop 9 -hole courses. Even specialist golf operators say they can make these courses work profitably." NGF, A Publication of the National Golf Foundation — April 2018: When Nine is Fine — Here's Where and How 9 -Hole Golf Courses Can Succeed by Adam Schupak "Nine -hole courses are golf's sandlots, a breeding ground for future golfers and a farm team of sorts for future private -club membership rolls. They often serve as the foundation for learning the game, as well as its customs and etiquette." "I wish I knew how it happened, but somewhere along the lines people came to the realization that golf doesn't have to be 18 holes," Pioppi said. 'It's OK. The goal is to play golf." "Nine -hole rounds are a fulfilling way to enjoy the game in half the time, often at a reduced price and in a format that is more welcoming to friends or family members who may be less experienced." "The nine -hole round is highly regarded for a range of appreciable benefits: It involves a lesser time commitment than playing 18 holes. It can be a less intimidating format to newcomers in learning the game's fundamentals, along with Rules and etiquette. Nine -hole scores are eligible for handicap purposes. A nine -hole round is cost-effective." USGA — May 5, 2016 USGA Deepens Commitment To 9 -Hole Recreational Golf Playing Format "With nine -hole golf facilities making up more than 30 percent of public courses in the United States, and 90 percent of 18 -hole public facilities offering nine -hole rates, the United States Golf Association supports PLAY9 Days as an optimal opportunity to play the great game of a lifetime, and encourage additional participation." Bottomline, our point is that we hope the town staff and Indigo Golf keep an open mind as they consider the viability of Pusch Ridge Golf. If we hang on to old thinking about the course and the people who play golf, we will overlook a great new opportunity. This is also before we consider the impact on the image and performance of the EI Conquistador Resort. We can't speak for HSL, but we can be fairly certain that open space as it is being managed now adds no benefit to the resort. Finally, keep in mind that Oro Valley is about to have the dubious distinction of being home to the only two major resorts in the Tucson area (out of 7) without an on-site golf course. This feature is often included in RFP's for major conventions and events. It doesn't matter how much play there is on the course. You must consider the larger impact on tourism in Oro Valley. We believe the town has been incredibly short-sighted with the decision to close Pusch Ridge during the pandemic as it attempted to lease the facility to HSL. Not only has the town lost golf revenues, it has taken an unfortunate hit to its reputation of being a good steward of its town assets. Please do not delay any further resolving this issue — make a decision. Carefully consider all of the information we have provided relevant to the current resurgence to golf, the long-term impact on our community, The Resort, the Town of Oro Valley and our collective future. Respectfully, Tony D'Angelo Golf Chair EI Conquistador Resort Patio Homes Association Stine, Michelle From: Randall, Diana Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 10:52 AM To: Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael Subject: FW: Resend: Mud hole once the beautiful Pusch Ridge Golf Course Attachments: golf course bad 5 jpg; golf course bad 4jpg; golf course badl jpg; Golf course Good morning, Please see below and attached for constituent comments. Sincerely, Diana Randall Executive Assistant Town Manager, Mayor and Council From: Marie Daniels Sent: Monday, February 1, 202110:50 AM To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>; Winfield, Joe <jwinfield@orovalleyaz.gov>; Barrett, Melanie <m ba rrett@o rova I leyaz.gov> Cc: Jacobs, Mary <mjacobs@orovalleyaz.gov>; Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov> Subject: Resend: Mud hole once the beautiful Pusch Ridge Golf Course Dear Mayor, Vice Mayor, and Council Members: I feel it imperative you see what the Pusch Ridge Par 4 golf course now appears after months of OV maintenance neglect and community/animal traffic. It is profoundly sad to see what the town has permitted it to become for this community. It has become a mud hole from animal digging, animal walkers and residents walking off the assigned golf path. As a functioning course, this never happened previously. If this is an indication to how your proposed 'open area" will be maintained, it is an accident waiting to happen for those who use it. Think insurance liability!! 1 PLEASE PLEASE postpone your decision to change it to an open area until the hotel gets on their feet these next few months and can work out a reasonable resolution with you and this community. Please respond to your reaction. Thank you, Marie Daniels EI Conquistador Patio Homes Oro Valley, AZ 2 Stine, Michelle From: Randall, Diana Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 2:07 PM To: Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael Subject: FW: Pusch Ridge Golf Course Good afternoon, Please see constituent comments below. Sincerely, Diana Randall Executive assistant Town Manager, Mayor and Council From: Jill Radel < Sent: Monday, February 1, 20211:51 PM To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov> Subject: Pusch Ridge Golf Course I am terrified with the thought of the Pusch Ridge Golf course becoming public open space. My property sits at the narrowest and most accessible portion of the course. Having people walking ( taking note?) within 2-3 feet of my property is unnerving. Where I once felt a sense of community and safety, I feel only fear. Is there not a tax approved and on-going that was meant to address maintenance? With the influx of Californians buying real estate here, and the recent Covid related interest in playing golf, shouldn't this be an opportunity? I would never purchase a property with public access within such close proximity & so near an maintained open space fire hazard. Please consider looking at this decision as an opportunity. If there is anything positive coming out of the Corona virus, it is the increased interest in golf. It is one of the few things people can and are doing. Most sincerely, Jill Radel Stine, Michelle From: Randall, Diana Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 2:19 PM To: Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael; Hynd, Jessica Subject: FW: Fate of Pusch Ridge Golf Course Good afternoon, Please sec below for constituent comments and ducstions (rhetorical&). Sincerch , Diana Randall I :�ccuti�c _A,sisruv 7 o�au �lanagcr, i�iflcor and Council From: John Haig Sent: Monday, February 1, 20212:15 PM To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov> Subject: Fate of Pusch Ridge Golf Course Dear Mayor Winfield and Oro Valley Town Council Members: Regarding the Pusch Ridge Golf Course (PR): I am writing again to encourage you to restore this unique property to its intended use as a golf course. As a homeowner in the EI Conquistador Resort Patio Homes Association I am admittedly biased in favor of said action. However, I think I have a tailwind of athletic, geographic, economic and somnambulatory arguments supporting my position. I'll try to be brief. • Golf playing at local municipal courses is on the rise, and national interest in 9 -hole courses is increasing. I find the PR course to be beautiful, cleverly designed and much more challenging than I had expected. I don't always tell friends that my score was on a 9 -hole course. • 1 have not seen, heard or read about any person or group clamoring for more "open space" in Oro Valley. When I want to enjoy open space, I put on hiking boots, grab poles and head to any number of local places where that equipment makes sense. For example, the versatile Linda Vista Trail is located only about 1,500 feet from the green on the 91h hole of the PR course. (Based on my worst drive on that hole — a wicked hook — it's only about 1,100 feet away. See Google Maps.) I can't speak for others, but low on my priority list is walking or hiking around a place that obviously looks like a previously flourishing (i.e., abandoned) golf course. Based on how the grass looks now, I would wonder about the quality of the hotel that would have this surrounding their main buildings. I might wonder how often their carpets get vacuumed. I must admit that, as open space, this would be the only place in Oro Valley where one could enjoy a stroll in the great outdoors while also viewing the back patio of approximately 113 homes. (On an off day of golf, I see a bit less of the fairways, and somewhat closer to 120 patios.) • 1 don't see how the town benefits, economically, from abandoning the PR course. If PR is designated as a discontinued facility, OV is obligated to maintain it "in a manner compatible with the operation of the Resort as a first class resort property." A quick online search of "first class resorts in AZ" yields several with gorgeous on-site golf courses — but none surrounded by first class open spaces consisting of formerly gorgeous tee boxes, fairways and greens. Sure, just "letting the course go" would be cheap. But reconfiguring it so that resort guests (and town residents) view it as an interesting, classy place to explore on foot would require some thought and money. Is that really cheaper than maintaining it as a golf course? Especially given that a special 0.5% sales tax is already generating funds to cover the costs of the 3 municipal courses. • The somnambulatory angle. True, I have often played behind some fellow duffers who appear to be sleep walking. But, they are perhaps engaged in one of the least harmful activities to the community. (In Florida, while riding my bicycle, I was hit by a car driven by a daydreaming octogenarian who would have been much less of a danger struggling to take his fifth putt on a par 3.) Question: Will you sleep better at night if the Council elects to decommission the PR course? Who would be the beneficiaries of that decision? Is there really a group of OV residents cheering the course's demise with anything close to the enthusiasm and determination with which my neighbors in the EI Con HOA are fighting to resurrect the PR course — resurrecting it to the use for which it was painstakingly designed almost three decades ago? If you don't like golf — or golfers — are you willing to risk of running into one of them (or, worse, vice versa) in the parking lot of Fry's or Home Depot when they could be safely testing their driving skills (pun intended) away from the general public on the PR course? Apologies. I said that I would try to be brief. I did not say that I would actually be brief. Thank you for reading this entire email. Respectfully, John Haig Stine, Michelle From: Randall, Diana Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 2:26 PM To: Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael Subject: FW: EI Conquistador 9 hole golf course Good afternoon, Please see below for constituent comments. Sincerely, Diana Randall Executive Assistant Town Manager, Mayor and Council From: Ann Liggins Sent: Monday, February 1, 20212:25 PM To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov> Cc: mjacobs@orovallyaz.gov; Diaz-Trahan, Kristy <kdiaz-trahan@orovalleyaz.gov> Subject: EI Conquistador 9 hole golf course Good afternoon Mayor, Vice Mayor and Council members, My husband and I moved into the EI Conquistador patio homes neighborhood about 5 and a half years ago. It was a beautiful location and, visually, a neighborhood we were proud to live in. We still love our home and our outstanding neighbors but as you know, the golf course has deteriorated to the point where I no longer feel proud. Frankly, I am more than disgusted and annoyed that you, the Mayor and town council, have taken the action of "inaction" in regards to the upkeep of our once beautiful property surrounding our homes. You all know full well, all of the reasons that this property needs to be restored to its former beauty and for the life of me, I cannot imagine why any of you would allow this to become a blight on Oro Valley, known for its high standard of living. All of the voters in OV know that there was a tax increase several years ago that was designated, in part, to keep this 9 hole course alive and cared for. Your deliberate move to let it fall to waste is extremely unethical if not illegal. What makes you think this is ok? Is it because as individuals you won't stand up to the other members and say'This isn't right, we need to honor our commitment and use the money that was allocated to support this propertyT Two questions to ask yourselves as individuals who were elected to uphold the standards of desirability to live in OV: 1. If I lived in the EI Con Patio Homes neighborhood, how would I feel about the current conditions of the course and how would I vote on this issue of upkeep? Be honest with yourselves, because you and I both know the answer. 2, Am I truly living by the golden rule to do unto others? Again be honest. That really is the bottom line. Vote with integrity and honor for all citizens that you were hired to serve. If you choose not to do the right thing, that is on you and you will have to live with that decision. I would like to think you will do the right thing - to honor your word and your integrity. Sincerely, Ann Liggins Oro Valley Virus -free. www.avo.com Stine, Michelle From: Randall, Diana Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2021 8:33 AM To: Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael Subject: FW: Pusch Ridge Golf Course. Good morning, Please see below for constituent comments. Sincerely, Diana Randall Executive Assistant Town Manager, Mayor and Council From: captainnick Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 202110:02 PM To: Winfield, Joe <jwinfield@orovalleyaz.gov>; Greene, Harry <hgreene@orovalleyaz.gov>; Jones -Ivey, Joyce <jjones- ivey@orovalleyaz.gov>; Nicolson, Josh <jnicolson@orovalleyaz.gov>; ssolomom@orovalleyaz.gov; Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>; Bohen, Timothy <tbohen@orovalleyaz.gov>; Barrett, Melanie <mbarrett@orovalleyaz.gov>; Jacob, Maryann <mjacob@orovalleyaz.gov>; Diaz-Trahan, Kristy<kdiaz-trahan@orovalleyaz.gov> Cc: admin@elconpatiohomes.org; 'Anna Bifano' - Subject: Pusch Ridge Golf Course. Dear Mayor, vice Mayor, Council Members, Mary Jacob and Kristi Diaz-Trahan I am compelled to write to you regarding the absolute disgrace and shambles of our Push Ridge Golf Course. This communication will be to the point and will pull no punches. I am honestly disgusted with the irresponsible attitude displayed by the Oro Valley Council. (with the exception of two Council members whom I prefer not to name) it appears that you are dead set against reinstating our golf course. Frankly, I don't believe that you ever intended to operate it as golf course and if in fact that can be proven, then you have charged and taken from us, and others in the Oro Valley Community, a large sum of money in the form of the tax increase you imposed, a percentage of which was to run Pusch Ridge Golf Course. At the very beginning of this debacle the HOA members were invited to a meeting at the Hilton Hotel regarding the Community Center on La Canada and the 3 golf courses. It was then we were TOLD that a deal had been consummated between the town of OV and HSL Properties. The majority in attendance were utterly shocked that we were not made aware of the purchase and that we literally had no say in the matter despite the fact that more than 250 homes in three HOA's are adjacent to the 'then green and well kept' golf fairways and was the primary reason the majority of buyers bought their homes here. And you have to agree that the outlook and beauty is a major Oro Valley draw because you have been touting the beauty of our Push Ridge and lovely well -kept and maintained 9 hole golf course on your Oro Valley website promotional material. We attended the meeting at the Hilton thinking that there was to be a discussion and that we would have a say in the decision of the Town going into the golfing business, but no, it was already a done deal when we turned up. I also believe that the reason for signing the deal was because the Town primarily wanted the Community center and it was such a sweet deal that OV took the'package' offered,. The offer included 3 golf courses. The OV Town had no expertise and experience in running golf courses but never the less took the task on. After the takeover we were slapped with a one half cent sales tax to help defray the costs of running the THREE golf courses and the Community Center. BUT, it is the general opinion that the Town never intended to maintain nor even retain the golf course at Push Ridge - as a golf course. Bad business !! But, if we were to give you the benefit of the doubt and it was your intention to maintain and run the 9 hole course then why didn't you use the percentage or portion of the imposed 1/2 cent sales tax raised to do so ? I understand that the half cent sales tax equates to approximately $2.5 million. That figure covers the maintenance of the 45 holes, therefore our 9 holes at Pusch Ridge qualifies for approximately 20% of the revenue or around $500,000. Even after one deducts an additional 5% or $125,000 from the Pusch Ridge tax revenue amount to cover the cost of maintaining the Community Center and any other buildings, then that should leave a balance of $375,000 for maintaining the needs of the 9 hole Pusch Ridge course. If proper promotion of the golf course, the tennis courts and other excellent facilities at the EI Conquistador Hotel were properly conducted, (Covid issues aside) then the revenue enhancement to Oro Valley, the Hotel and its facilities would have been and would be in the future vastly improved. There is no way that a golf course can survive when it is closed for the Summer and only open between 9 am and 1 pm each day for the balance of the year. I am not sure of those days and times of operation, but many in the neighborhood would get an early start and play all year round including the Summer. Our golf Course was successful even though it lacked aggressive, targeted promotion. It is a fact that golf did go through a decline for a while but that decline has reversed itself. It is also a fact that many people are returning to enjoying the 9 hole courses as they can play forjust a half day and spend the rest of the day with family, business or enjoying other activities. Pusch Ridge was for many years recognized as one of the most beautiful, scenic, pleasing and challenging golf courses in Southern Arizona. I understand that according to the Town council meeting recently, the municipal courses without Pusch Ridge are up 22%. This speaks volumes for the sport. As to our property values. If the property values decline due to the neighborhood desirability level dropping, then, so will the revenue from property tax !! So it begs the question just how much greater our property values might be now had we the beauty and the facility of the golf course in the condition it was before you took it over and destroyed it. I think this whole problem was a deceptively contrived plan - again, I don't think it was ever your intention to do anything but let the property go to pot ! How can you in all conscience allow this to happen, particularly as Oro Valley benefits by riding on the coat tails of such a first class facility as the EI Conquistador resort. Surely you see the immense value of that resort property? The Oro Valley Marketing Brochure shows a beautiful picture of a green golf course and the Pusch Ridge mountain in the background. BUT look at it now. Attached are 5 pictures I took on the 2nd of February 2021. What an utter shambles ... and total disgrace. Just how do you manage to conduct yourselves having made such an irresponsible decision. If my assumptions are correct, (and you only have to look at the condition of the 2 La Canada courses and some other public courses in and around this area), you are not only guilty of abandoning our Golf course but you have also wrongfully collected taxes as they relate to their use on our golf course property The EI Conquistador Hilton Hotel is one of Oro Valleys great tourist draws and revenue producers (obviously outside of this terrible Covid issue). Many people visit and stay in the Hilton and many have played golf on the friendly but challenging 9 hole course. But not anymore. I am also critical of the way HSL seemingly has not promoted the Hotel. We are all extremely disappointed with the actions and poor judgement of the Oro Valley Town Council members. Also, collectively we are very concerned about the intentions of our Town manager, Mary Jacob. When she was introduced at a Town Hall meeting shortly after her appointment, she made strong categorical statements which it turns out now may not have been as well intentioned and sincere as we then thought. She said she was a fighter and would be 'so in our court'. But, what 'court' was she referring to, it certainly doesn't seem to be ours as we understand she is somewhat a fly in the ointment regarding the continuation of the Pusch Ridge Golf Course as a Golf course. Ms. Jacob, it would be refreshing if you would please take a look at the grave situation we have with Pusch Ridge Golf Course and offer some encouraging words such as you are indeed 'in our court' and will push to rectify the current situation. As stated above:: Pusch Ridge was for many years recognized as one of the most beautiful scenic and interesting golf courses in Southern Arizona. Please, for the good of Oro Valley and those living here, bring it back to its old glory. I sincerely appeal to all the Council members, please, do the right thing. You have the funds, let's all pull together and get this beautiful course back to the pristine condition it once was. Sincerely. Nicolas and carolyn Bond. (20 year residents on Push Ridge Golf Course). Stine, Michelle From: Standish, Michael Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2021 8:51 AM To: Stine, Michelle Subject: FW: Westward Look PAD From: Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 20219:54 PM To: Standish, Michael <mstandish@orovalleyaz.gov> Subject: Westward Look PAD Hello Mr. Michael Standish, Please distribute my letter to the Mayor, Council and Mr Speath. Also, feel free to contact me if you have any questions per my request. Dear Mayor and Council, It was obvious in tonight's Council meeting that there was hesitation and confusion to what was being voted on item C. And for such an important vote, which Council members elected not to attend the meeting; specifically the two that personally went door to door talking to residents in the Westward Look Estates; I suggest they review the recording of the meeting. The fear is deception and the opportunity for'bate and switch' with the confusion of mixing up the concepts. We were shown that 2 story buildings (concept A and C) limited the perception to privacy of a person on a second story building 120' away looking into our backyards but not concept B. This gives in to conspiracy that when a master plan is drafted months later that we do not get our privacy because the confused council allows concept B less which is less than 120'. Mr. Speath, we will have to consider our legal options against all parties including individuals if the submitted master plan ignores The Planning Center and Westward Look's proposed 120' of perception to privacy along the East boundary. Thank you in advance for your consideration in the matter. Regards, Jon and Angela Rowley Stine, Michelle From: Randall, Diana Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2021 12:29 PM To: Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael Subject: FW: Pusch Ridge Golf Course Please sec below for constituent comments Sinccrcl , tlliana Randall I accutivc .Assistant '1'o%�n Nhinager, NIm or and Council From: marci Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 202112:08 PM To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov> Subject: Pusch Ridge Golf Course Please do not let Pusch Ridge become another casualty of Covid 19. It is a beautiful 9 hole course which I have been playing for the past 20 years as a member of The Quails golf league. The 18 hole courses at the Community Center are not 9 hole friendly and are actually dangerous for 9 hole play since there is no safe way to return to the club house after completing 9 holes. I do not live in Oro Valley and miss shopping there on the way home from golf. I hope you will reopen the course. Thank you, Marcia Williams Stine, Michelle From: Randall, Diana Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2021 1:45 PM To: Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael Subject: FW: Proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezoning near 1st Ave & Tangerine Hi, Please see below for constituent comments. Sincerely, Diana Randall Executive Assistant Town Manager, Mayor and Council From: Frank Mayfield < _ Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2U11 1:14 PM To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov> Subject: Proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezoning near 1st Ave & Tangerine To the Town of Oro Valley, I would like to voice my concerns regarding the following request for rezoning... "The applicant is proposing a General Plan Amendment and Rezoning for a vacant commercial parcel located near the southeast corner of the 1st Avenue and Tangerine Road intersection to allow apartments, rental casitas, senior care, townhomes, and single-family homes (case numbers 2001085 and 2001306)." It seems that investors commonly purchase tracts of vacant land, with KNOWN zoning restrictions, speculating on their ability to obtain a variance granted by the Town of Oro Valley. Developers & speculators benefit financially when this happens, at the expense of the residents of Oro Valley, who then are subjected to higher density, heavy traffic, more noise, and a loss of views. Requests for variances from the General Plan, and rezoning of commercial properties to other uses, diminishes opportunities for Town of Oro Valley residents to obtain employment, and to access and enjoy nearby retail establishments within our community. Please consider the General Plan & existing zoning as the footprint and guiding values for our community, rather than a nuisance to investors who cannot develop their properties within the existing guidelines. Thank YOU for the opportunity to express my thoughts! Frank Mayfield Edward Jones Joe Dylewski 11941 N 1st Ave Suite 171 Financial Advisor Oro Valley, AZ 85737 (520)219-4707 EdwardJones February 2, 2021 Oro Valley Mayor and Town Councilmembers Mr. Bayer Vella, AICP Town of Oro Valley Planning Manager 11000 N. La Canada Dr. Oro Valley, AZ 85737 Dear Mr. Mayor, Councilmembers, and Mr. Vella, My name is Joe Dylewski and my Edward Jones office is at the intersection of 15t Ave and Tangerine Rd in the Ace Shopping Center. I have been serving residents of the Oro Valley community for over 11 years and a resident of Oro Valley since 2007. 1 relocated to Oro Valley after retiring from the United States Air Force. In my many duty stations throughout the country I had the opportunity to live in and nearby many various communities. One thing I clearly noticed was that successful communities, were the ones that grew smartly. I believe this proposal allows Oro Valley to do just that. I have reviewed the updated proposal of Silverhawke block 5's one-story casitas project and I think that is a very wise use of the property. This development will bring additional people, help support our local retailers and fill up many of the empty storefronts. The need for additional residents is evident just in our shopping center alone. There are empty storefronts that have never been occupied in over 14 years. The one-story housing use makes more sense than waiting on empty land for potential employers, especially considering all the available land elsewhere. I respectfully request that you please represent your constituents and vote in favor of the Silverhawke block 5 General Plan Amendment and rezoning for Casitas. Sincerely, J February 2, 2021 Oro Valley Mayor and Town Councilmembers Attn: Mr. Bayer Vella, AICP 11000 N. La Canada Dr. Oro Valley, AZ 85737 Dear Honorable Mayor, Councilmembers, and Mr. Vella, I am an industrial properties specialist and a Principal with PICOR / Cushman Wakefield. I started working with PICOR in 1985, much of that experience has involved working with employers looking in Pima County and in Oro Valley looking for potential options for relocation and expansion of their businesses Based on my 35 years of experience in Industrial properties, the concept of a Research and Development/Employment use would be great if a buyer were to be found. Unfortunately, the market throughout Pima County is shallow for this type of company and even more so in Oro Valley as there is an abundance of land available for this type of use both in Pima County and Oro Valley. When evaluating the Silverhawke block 5 site specifically it is unlikely to develop as a Research and Development/Employment site for the following reasons: 1. It is located adjacent to a subdivision that will have homes constructed within the next year. 2. The site has low to no visibility next to a major arterial. These 2 constraints make Silverhawk block 5's viability as prospective Research and Development/Employment site low in comparison to other potential sites in Pima County and Oro Valley. Thank you, Signature Printed Name Contact Info Stine, Michelle From: Standish, Michael Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2021 1:52 PM To: Stine, Michelle Subject: FW: Zoning hearing From: hr Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2021 11:55 AM To: Standish, Michael <mstandish@orovalleyaz.gov> Subject: Zoning hearing Hello, I recently sent an email with several issues regarding this renewed appeal for a zoning change around 1 st Avenue and Tangerine. am a home owner and taxpayer living in the single family Rancho Vistoso complex. This neighborhood has already been developed and designated as a single family residential area. Two additional single family housing areas have already been build on the east side of 1 st Ave and south of Tangerine. These houses are extremely close together (packed in) and degrade the open appearance of our community. These new development have also impacted the utility usage and increased the traffic flow here, especially during high traffic times. Adding additional single family housing will increase this traffic congestion at the nearby Safeway adding to this dangerous intersection. For example, when exiting on the west side of this Safeway strip mall requires making a U Turn to go south, which many cars do. This has exuberated this into difficult traffic hazard as cars approaching the intersection on Rancho Vistoso going south typically are travelling at 40+ mph. We've already seen a collision here within the last few weeks! Additionally any commercial or multi -family structures on either side of Tangerine are not in keeping with the characteristics of our neighborhood. There are already many vacant commercial suites available both on the west side of 1 st and Tangerine, as well as in the Walmart shopping center to the east. As a result I would like to voice my vehement objection to any new zoning change in this area. There is several other more appropriate locations for this type of development in the Oro Valley area. Kind Regards, Mr. Herbert Phillips Stine, Michelle From: Standish, Michael Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2021 1:27 PM To: Stine, Michelle Subject: FW: Why are you against Young Professionals and Young Seniors investing in Oro Valley? From: Lisa M. Hopper Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 202112:13 PM To: Winfield, Joe <jwinfield@orovalleyaz.gov>; Barrett, Melanie <mbarrett@orovalleyaz.gov>; Bohen, Timothy <tbohen@orovalleyaz.gov>; Greene, Harry <hgreene@orovalleyaz.gov>; Jones -Ivey, Joyce <jjones- ivey@orovalleyaz.gov>; Nicolson, Josh <jnicolson@orovalleyaz.gov>; Solomon, Steve <ssolomon@orovalleyaz.gov>; Standish, Michael <mstandish@orovalleyaz.gov>; Vella, Bayer <bvella@orovalleyaz.gov> Subject: Why are you against Young Professionals and Young Seniors investing in Oro Valley? Why is Mayor Winfield and council against younger professionals and young active seniors from having an opportunity to live and invest in Oro Valley? Why are some of the Council refusing to sit down and talk to the Kai's? Why is there Rezoning Opposition for Tangerine and First Ave. Casita Style Homes? Who does not want this to be built? Positive Position: 1. • The people and businesses of the community are for it (Read letters sent) 2. a Better options for Young Professionals and Active Seniors 3. • Walking distance from Businesses and new Market Place 4. a Cost efficient for people wanting to move/live/work in Oro Valley. 5. • Smaller footprint environmentally responsible 6. • No car needed to receive all the needs of living independently My name is Lisa Hopper and I have lived in this community for over 26 years. I moved to Oro Valley when I was in my early 30's. I am concerned that the current Oro Valley Council is not giving the Kia's an opportunity to provide the very kind of units that are needed in Oro Valley for individuals that want to own and live in a smaller unit such as their proposed Casita style homes. The current options for individuals younger and older are either an apartment or older people wanting to downsize have an option to buy either a single family home or go straight into assisted living. The Casita is a great option. If the community and businesses want it why are you against it? This is the perfect option for those wanting a smaller footprint both size, financially and environmentally. It's also an opportunity for the Town to receive more sale tax $. Thank you for letting my voice be heard. Lisa H000er ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL. FEBRUARY 3, 2021 6PM ONLINE ZOOM MEETING Join Zoom Meeting: https:/Ioroval[eV.zoom.us/m/96070780591 TO: Oro Valley Town Council FROM: Mr. J.J.Johnston, CEcD, FM, IOM DATE: February 3, 2021 Subject: Support of the Silver Hawke housing project Good evening Mayor Winfield & Town Council, I am writing you tonight for the first time since my retirement as your Director of Community and Economic Development. It is good to be with you again. Beverly and I are proud and permanent full-time residents of Oro Valley. Tonight, I want to go on record in support of the proposed Silver Hawke housing project. To be clear, we have no financial interests in this proposed housing development. Oro Valley is blessed by highly engaged community members who deeply care about the future of the community. Our community is highly -respected for its public safety, well-managed local government services, outstanding public infrastructure, top-ranked schools, scenic view sheds, smart land use and a shared sense of environmental stewardship. Community and economic development is a collaborative process of developing economic, social and political environments in which suitable, balanced long-term growth may be realized at the community level. The Your Voice, Our Future General Plan set forth the foundation to guide and direct the community and economic development priorities of local government, which include: ➢ Developing and sustaining a diverse and robust economy that supports long-term economic and financial stability in the community. ➢ Establishing policies, strategies, programs and projects that help attract new investment and job creation to Oro Valley. ➢ Supporting a wide range of services, including quality housing. Businesses and their employees need property to make their dreams come true. Tonight, you have an opportunity to help attract a very nice new housing project from a high quality development team. Please let me add this perspective for your consideration. During my tenure as Director of Community and Economic Development for the TOV, I met with dozens of local employers. Several CEO's and site managers asked if the town could do anything more to attract additional housing for the benefit of their employees. As you know, existing apartments continue to have occupancy rates in excess of 95%. Oro Valley needs additional housing options. Please think about employers like the OV Hospital, and other health and hospitality employers who need to accommodate their service workers. Think about the UA Veterinarian College faculty, staff and students who would benefit by having nearby housing, And think about the dozens of other local employers and their employees who live somewhere else simply because of the limited supply and comparatively higher cost of housing in Oro Valley. You can help change that tonight. As our community, state and nation continues to recover from the devastating effects of the global pandemic, communities across the country are stepping up their efforts to attract new residents and businesses. Businesses need new consumers to have sustained profitability. Consumers and service workers need a diverse supply of housing stock. To that end, Mr. Kai and his project team propose to bring new casitas that could either be leased &/or purchased. This fills an existing need and would also support new possibilities for the town to attract new home-based professional services. New entrepreneurs could also be attracted to the community, such as was the case with my company back in 2017. We leased, then -purchased a home in SCOV. While in OV I served clients located in multiple countries and other states. In a direct sense, the work from our home in OV was integral to bringing net new revenues to Arizona and to OV. People who work from home represent a sound and sustainable economic development opportunity. I'll wrap-up with this... I respectfully ask that you help welcome this and other opportunities that bring new housing options to our workers and their families. Thank you for your consideration. February 2, 2021 Oro Valley Mayor and Town Councilmembers Attn: Mr. Bayer Vella, AICP 11000 N. La Canada Dr. Oro Valley, AZ 85737 Dear Honorable Mayor, Councilmembers, and Mr. Vella, I am an industrial properties specialist and a Principal with PICOR / Cushman Wakefield. I started working with PICOR in 1985, much of that experience has involved working with employers looking in Pima County and in Oro Valley looking for potential options for relocation and expansion of their businesses Based on my 35 years of experience in Industrial properties, the concept of a Research and Development/Employment use would be great if a buyer were to be found. Unfortunately, the market throughout Pima County is shallow for this type of company and even more so in Oro Valley as there is an abundance of land available for this type of use both in Pima County and Oro Valley. When evaluating the Silverhawke block 5 site specifically it is unlikely to develop as a Research and Development/Employment site for the following reasons: 1. It is located adjacent to a subdivision that will have homes constructed within the next year. 2. The site has low to no visibility next to a major arterial. These 2 constraints make Silverhawk block 5's viability as prospective Research and Development/Employment site low in comparison to other potential sites in Pima County and Oro Valley. Thank you, Signature Printed Name Contact Info February 2, 2021 Oro Valley Mayor and Town Councilmembers Mr. Bayer Vella, AICP Town of Oro Valley Planning Manager 11000 N. La Canada Dr. Oro Valley, AZ 85737 Dear Mr. Mayor, Councilmembers, and Mr. Vella, I have been a resident of Oro Valley for over 7 years. For the past three years I have lived in the Catalina Shadows neighborhood which is very close to this property. I've become familiar with the issues surrounding the Silverhawke block 5 General Plan amendment and rezoning. I've spoken with some of my neighbors about the plan, and we would all prefer to have additional housing at this location instead of a 2 -story employment, retail, research & distribution or office facility for several reasons. First, considering its close proximity to the existing Silverhawke subdivision, the current proposal is much preferable as a 1 -story alternative versus the previous submitted 2 -story plan. Further, in my work I interact with many of the local business owners and restauranteurs. Having more residents in this location will greatly help our struggling retailers, and maybe even bring in a new retailer to fill existing vacant space. We have a lot of empty storefronts in Oro Valley in this area—just drive through the plaza surrounding Walgreens, and you'll see what I mean. The Casita option proposed on the Silverhawke Block 5 would be a beneficial and preferred addition to our community. As one of your constituents I strongly urge you to vote in support of the Silverhawke Block 5 Casita General Plan amendment and rezoning. Thank you, Signature Sean Smiley Printed Name Contact Info February 3, 2021 Oro Valley Mayor and Town Councilmembers Mr. Bayer Vella, AICP Town of Oro Valley Planning Manager 11000 N. La Canada Dr. Oro Valley, AZ 85737 Dear Mr. Mayor, Councilmembers, and Mr. Vella, Ace Hardware has been in business at the intersection of First Ave. and Tangerine Rd. for roughly 12 years. Our store is west of the Silverhawke block 5 project being proposed. We have seen Oro Valley grow during our years of business here and have appreciated having new subdivsions like the Villages of Silverhawke but it has not been enough people to support local businesses. Although Oro Valley has grown, so has the pressure from online retailers which have made it has still been a struggle for a small business like ours and other brick and mortar retailers. In our shopping Center there have been empty storefronts that have never been occupied since 2006. There are other empty spaces at Oracle and I` and empty buildings at Oro Valley Marketplace. There is enough undeveloped commercial and employment land to meet the supply the needs of this area. It would be a better to approve the Silverhawke block 5 property for a residential use to help bring more people to help support existing businesses and hopefully bring new ones to fill the empty spaces. additional residential development in this area and vote in favor of the Silverhawke block 5 General Plan Amendment and rezoning for Casitas. Thank You, —f\ —` Justin Piccoh General Manager/Owner �Orn Valley AWE Harldware Store #14650 11921 N. First Ave Oro Valley, AZ 85737 Phone: 520.297.0222 Fax: 520.297.0236 ovacehardware.com Nationally Known, Locally Owned ORO VALLEY ACE HARDWARE • 11921 N. FIRST AVE • ORO VALLEY. AZ 85737 • PHONE: (520)297.0222. FAX: (520) 297.0236 • OVACEHARDWARE.COM Feb. 2, 2021 Oro Valley Mayor and Town Councilmembers Attn: Mr. Bayer Vella, AICP 11000 N. La Canada Dr. Oro Valley, AZ 85737 Dear Mr. Mayor, Councilmembers, and Mr. Vella, I am writing regarding the Silvehawke block 5 reconsideration hearing for the General Plan Amendment and Rezoning application that will be presented to you on Wednesday February 3rd. I am an industrial properties specialist and a Principal with Picor / Cushman Wakefield. I start working with industrial properties in Tucson in 1983, and have been with PICOR since 1994, all of that experience has been in the industrial real estate sector, involved working with employers looking in Southern Arizona and in Oro Valley looking for potential options for relocation and expansion of their businesses. Many companies will only consider locations that are close to interstate highways and railroads, which immediately excludes communities like Oro Valley. So, when marketing Oro Valley's available employment properties we tend to focus on lifestyle considerations such as schools, recreational opportunities, and available housing. Oro Valley boasts strong schools and recreational amenities, but we've heard from a number of potential employers that the cost and variety of Oro Valley's housing options are woefully inadequate. Allowing the Silverhawke Block 5 property to develop as a casita neighborhood would be an excellent addition to the Town's housing stock that would be very attractive to potential employers by giving their employees a place to live at a reasonable price point. Based on my experience in the industrial market, I would categorize the Silverhawke block 5 site as an inferior employment site. It is located adjacent to a subdivision that will have homes constructed within the nextyear, which is always a concern for potential employers. Theyworry about disturbing neighboring homes with their operations (noise, lighting, etc.). This constraint makes Silverhawk block 5's viability as prospective employment land site low in comparison to other potential sites in Oro Valley. The best and most viable use for that property would be to allow it to develop as a sensitively designed residential neighborhood. Oro Valley's existing and future employers would agree. Thank you, Signature Stephen Cohen Printed Name Contact Info February 2, 2021 Oro Valley Mayor and Town Councilmembers Mr. Bayer Vella, AICP Town of Oro Valley Planning Manager 11000 N. La Canada Dr. Oro Valley, A2 85737 Dear Mr. Mayor, Councilmembers, and Mr. Vella: I am a new resident of Oro Valley since May of 2020 and have enjoyed my decision to relocate here very much. I am writing to express my support for utilizing the Silverhawk block 5 General Plan amendment and rezoning to allow the construction of one story casitas. Given the current issues surrounding the closing of numerous local Oro Valley retail establishments, it seems like a natural decision to have additional housing options available atthis location. I believe the nearby residents will appreciate the current proposal now as a 1 story alternative versus the previous 2 story plan. Having more people in this location will also aid Oro Valley restaurants and smaller service industries such as laundry facilities, beauty spas, yoga facilities, etc.. Given the direct access to Tangerine Road, the one story casita development option appears to be a great fit at this location and would benefit our entire residential and business communities. Please vote in support of the Silverhawke Block 5 Casita General Plan amendment and rezoning. Thank you, Peter Hoch Stine, Michelle From: Standish, Michael Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2021 8:53 AM To: Stine, Michelle Subject: FW: Letter of Support for the rezoning of 1st and Tangerine General Plan Importance: High From: Laura Raymund( Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 202111:28 PM To: Winfield, Joe <jwinfield@orovalleyaz.gov> Cc: Barrett, Melanie <mbarrett@orovalleyaz.gov>; Bohen, Timothy <tbohen@orovalleyaz.gov>; Greene, Harry <hgreene@orovalleyaz.gov>; Jones -Ivey, Joyce <jjones-ivey@orovalleyaz.gov>; Nicolson, Josh <jnicolson@orovalleyaz.gov>; Solomon, Steve <ssolomon@orovalleyaz.gov>; Standish, Michael <mstandish@orovalleyaz.gov>; Vella, Bayer<bvella@orovalleyaz.gov> Subject: Letter of Support for the rezoning of 1st and Tangerine General Plan Importance: High Dear Mr. Mayor and Council Members, I would like to introduce myself; my name is Laura and I have been a resident of Oro Valley for about 28 years. I've raised my family in this Community and seen it evolve. My line of work is heavily based on face-to-face interaction and needs of the citizens and visitors of Oro Valley. I am currently a real estate agent of 17 years with Long Realty and an Airbnb Owner of 3 years. I have also been in the Hotels Resorts for at least 7 years of my time here in our community. As I have read the proposal of the projects, I recognize the need most for the residential casita which I fully support as a great addition to the Oro Valley home inventory. This unique and modern concept of a detached homes will draw more people to explore and feel the vibe of Oro Valley before committing to residency! I feel it will be well received positively by our citizen as a home alternative and seen as a more secure residence than the idea of being close to an apartments complex. There is truly a need for this type of residence that could solve situations and anxieties where to locate, especially in our tight housing market. When considering the current commercial zoning and employment, which will be more impactful on the neighbors and community? With the vast Oro Valley Market Place, retail at the intersection of r" and Tangerine and all the employment land at Innovation Park we need more residences to support our local businesses, especially now. I believe the casitas use is more cohesive with the existing community. Also, when I think of today's current economic environment keeping empty land located in town is not a good use of the property and not supporting the financial needs of the town or community. In my opinion I see that this location works will have denser housing options being near Tangerine Road will truly help supporting our local businesses. Thank you again for your time on hearing my point of view as a local citizen who is hopeful for a prosperous Oro Valley! I again support this General Plan and Rezoning for these 2 uses and request that the council vote to support this proposal. Best Regard, Laura Muller Raymundo You have questions, I have the answers. Laura Muller Raymundo Oro Valley Branch La u raWD LonERea Itv. co m lauram. LongRealty.com (520) 918-7479/(520)800- 9164 WIRE FRAUD is on the rise. I will never send wiring instructions to you, so always call if you receive anything. Oro Valley Mayor and Town Council members Mr. Bayer Vella, AICP Town of Oro Valley Planning Manager 11000 N La Canada Dr. Oro Valley, Az 85737 Mr. Mayor, Council members and Mr. Vella, Rosati s Pizza Sports Pub has been in Oro Valley since 2017, across the streetfrom the proposed Silverhawke Block 5 development. My husband and I have been residents of Oro Valley for 17 year. While we have seen Oro Valley develop from a "retirement" community to one of great diversity in those years the housing availability has not kept up. Silverhawke was certainly a nice addition! Putting commercial/industrial buildings in the space next to them would be a disservice to not only those residents, but future Oro Valley Residents, Oro Valley business owners are facing financial struggles. Having more residents in the area would be very beneficial. As tax payers, and voters we respectfully ask you to vote to support the rezoning of Silverhawke Block 5. Thank you, Patrick and Jeanette Bush Rosati's Pizza Sports Pub/Owners February 2, 2021 Oro Valley Mayor and Town Councilmembers Town of Oro Valley 11000 N. La Canada Dr. Oro Valley, AZ 85737 Dear Mr. Mayor, Councilmembers: I'm writing this letter in support of the Silverhawke Block 5 rezoning development near Tangerine Road and First Avenue. It appears that the developers have revised their development plans to make Silverhawke a welcome addition to the neighborhood and Oro Valley. People want to live in Oro Valley, but currently there is a lack of inventory for housing and the cost of homes has soared. The Silverhawke Development is a well thought out plan. One of the most positive attributes of the development is that the residents won't have to jump in their cars to drive anywhere for what they need. They will be able to walk to Safeway, Walgreens, Ace Hardware and the nearby restaurants. The residents will be able to jump on their bikes and ride to the Oro Valley Market place and access all the bike paths in the area. All this adds to the quality of life and helps our business community. I've been a resident of Oro Valley and Rancho Vistoso for over 25 years. I've watched and was happy to see the positive growth in Oro Valley. At the same time, I've witnessed businesses that have not made it. There are enough empty storefronts in strip centers and empty buildings in Oro Valley. We need a population base that can support our businesses. Oro Valley needs thoughtful residential development for its citizens. We also need to make our business community just not survive, but thrive. Please vote to allow this project move forward. Thank you, //�aI�ZCLa- �Cf Thomas Hoch B URRIS & MAC O MBER, PLLC ATTORNEYS AT LAW D. Rob Burris, Esq. 2478 E. River Road Telephone: (520) 775-2000 Attorney at Law Tucson, Arizona 85718 Facsimile: (520) 775-2001 Email: rob@burrismacomber.eom February 2, 2021 Sent via email to jwinfield@,orovalleyaz.gov; mbarrettaa.orovallevaz.gov; tbohenna.orovallevaz.gov; h reene@orovalleyaz.gov; ijones-ivey@orovalleyaz.gov; inicolson(@,orovalleyaz.eov; ssolomon@orovalleyaz.eov; mstandishCa orovalleyaz.gov; bvella(a)orovallevaz.gov Town of Oro Valley Mayor and Council c/o Mr. Bayer Vella, AICP Town of Oro Valley Planning Manager 11000 N. La Canada Dr. Oro Valley, AZ 85737 RE: Sllverhawke Block S Proposed Development Dear Mr. Mayor, Councilmembers, and Mr. Vella, I provide this letter to express and confirm my full support for the proposed amendment to the general plan and related rezoning regarding the proposed development known as Silverhawke Block 5 Casita. I have been a resident of Oro Valley for over forty-two (42) years. I have seen Oro Valley grow from a "northern outpost' of Tucson consisting of primarily ranchers and retirees, to a flourishing township attracting young families and professionals of all types. While other opportunities presented themselves, I chose to remain in Oro Valley because that is where I wanted to settle my family and raise my children. I currently live at the end of Palisades Road, in the Palisades Point subdivision. I am an attomey specializing in business and real estate. I am married with twin six year-olds. My wife works for the University of Arizona and our children attend preschool at Resurrection Lutheran Church. My children are both actively involved in the club sports and other youth programs offered by the Town. My family is committed to Oro Valley and its future wellbeing. Living on Palisades Road, I am very familiar with the Silverhawke development projects on both the north and south side of the road. I have known James Kai for twenty (20) years. He is an honest and upstanding individual. James has an ability to understand the needs of the community and to fulfill those needs by organizing, planning and developing first class residential projects, as he has shown with the two current Silverhawke projects. I have become familiar with the issues surrounding the Silverhawk block 5 General Plan amendment and rezoning. I attended the last Council meeting which addressed this issue and was one of the numerous supporters who took the time to call in and make their voices heard. There was so much support expressed during the meeting that I was shocked to learn that the Council had rejected the proposal. The Council's decision was disappointing, short-sighted, and not reflective of the Oro Valley community's needs and desires. Oro Valley does not need more commercial space. The Town cannot fill the commercial space presently available and thus it makes absolutely no sense to force more commercial development on the community. What Oro Valley needs is residential growth. Oro Valley needs to be an inviting and welcoming place to families and professionals seeking to plant their roots. Residential growth is what will help the Town to grow and prosper. There is a saying, "if you build it, they will come," and that is true in Oro Valley. More available (and affordable) housing will bring more life-long residents. More residents will equate to more financial stability and growth for the entire community. Our retailers, restaurants and overall business community are struggling. Bringing more residents to the area will help support our local businesses. Changing the proposed development from two-story to one-story makes sense and will lessen any perceived negative impact on the neighboring properties. Direct access to/from Tangerine Road will also help mitigate any negative traffic impact. The revised proposal is first- class and will only add to that which Oro Valley has to offer to young families and professionals, who will be the lifeblood of our Town's future prosperity and growth. As one of your constituents, I request that you vote in support of the Silverhawke Block 5 Casita General Plan amendment and rezoning. Your attention to this matter and courtesies are appreciated in advance. Sincerely, BURRIS & MACOMBER, PLLC D. ob Burris Stine, Michelle From: Standish, Michael Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2021 1:43 PM To: Stine, Michelle Subject: FW: PROPOSED 1ST AVENUE AND TANGERINE ROAD GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND REZONING FOR 13.44 -ACRES Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged From: Jacobs, Mary <mjacobs@orovalleyaz.gov> Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 202111:49 AM To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov> Cc: Standish, Michael <mstandish@orovalleyaz.gov> Subject: FW: PROPOSED 1STAVENUE AND TANGERINE ROAD GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND REZONING FOR 13.44 - ACRES Members of Council, Mayor Winfield requested that you receive the following email from the Tucson Chamber of Commerce. Mary Mary Jacobs, Town Manager Town of Oro Valley 11000 N. La Canada Dr. Oro Valley, AZ 85737 520-229-4725 www.orovallevaz.gov All messages created in this system should be considered a public record subject to disclosure under the Arizona Public Records Law (A.R.S. 39-121) with no expectation of privacy related to the use of this technology. From: Winfield, Joe <iwinfield@orovallevaz.eov> Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 202111:33 AM To: Jacobs, Mary <miacobs@orovallevaz.gov> Subject: FW: PROPOSED 1ST AVENUE AND TANGERINE ROAD GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND REZONING FOR 13.44 - ACRES Mary, Please forward to the other council members if they have not already received it. Thanks, Joseph C. Winfield, Mayor Town of Oro Valley 11000 N. La Canada Dr. Oro Valley, AZ 85737 520-229-4700 www.orovallevaz.gov All messages created in this system should be considered a public record subject to disclosure under the Arizona Public Records Law (A.R.S. 39-121) with no expectation of privacy related to the use of this technology. From: Michael Guymon <mauvmonl?Dtucsonchamber.ore> Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 202110:23 AM To: Winfield, Joe <iwinfield(cDorovallevaz.gov> Subject: PROPOSED 1ST AVENUE AND TANGERINE ROAD GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND REZONING FOR 13.44 - ACRES Mayor Winfield, I saw that the Oro Valley Mayor and Council reconsidered the vote that initially disapproved the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezoning for a project near the intersection of 11t Avenue and Tangerine Rd. The Tucson Metro Chamber supports the ultimate approval of this project scheduled for consideration at the February 3, 2021 meeting. The developer has submitted a letter in response to Council and resident concerns officially removing all other development options limiting the proposal to the development of rental casitas. This seems reasonable and appropriate. As we stated in our letter sent on January 5, 2021, in the last 10 years, the homebuilding industry has been challenged with labor issues and availability of developable land. As a result, it is estimated that our region is undersupplied by around 5,000 homes when comparing total SFR permits (23,207) and household growth (28,254). This undersupply of new housing has contributed to rising home prices, lack of resale inventory and decreased affordability and that has not changed much during the pandemic. I would add that as our economy starts to improve post -pandemic, we need to make sure we are situated well and providing the diverse housing options people will need as the economy grows. Our scope is region wide. As companies look at our region to expand or relocate, communities and municipalities will need to responsibly provide housing options for current and future residents. We communicate this argument to all jurisdictions throughout the region since this housing shortfall should not be limited to one city or town. All communities should be acceptable of and build diverse housing options in response to companies expanding in our region and to help keep housing options more affordable as compared to other markets. Thank you for your consideration of our position and I would be more than happy to answer TUCSON questions you have. { METRO CHAMBER Sincerely, Michael Guymon Michael S. Guymon • Vice President P 520.792.2250 ext 150 • C 520.260.3666 mouvmon(abtucsonchamber.org • TucsonChamber.ora Tucson Metro Chamber • 212 E. Broadway Blvd. • Tucson, AZ 85701 © © 0 a Mission: Champion an environment where your business thrives and our community prospers Confidentiality Notice: This message contains information from the Tucson Metro Chamber and is confidential or privileged. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify this office by return email or telephone (520) 792-1212 immediately so that we may arrange for the retrieval of the information at no cost to you. Stine, Michelle From: Randall, Diana Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 3:16 PM To: Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael Subject: FW: Kai property Good afternoon, Please see below for constituent comments. Sincerely, Diana Randall Executive Assistant Town Manager, Mayor and Council -----Original Message ----- From: Judy Krausser- Sent: Monday, February 1, 20212:55 PM To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov> Subject: Kai property Regarding the council meeting this week. We are vehemently opposed to these three sites for building. There are two north of Safeway and the one near Woodburne and Moore. We live on Wayfarer Way with our backyard facing Woodburne near the Painted Sky school and have for 241/2 years. There is already so much traffic on Woodburne when school is in session with parents dropping off and picking up the kids. We shop at the Safeway plaza often and sometimes getting in and out of there is a real problem. We do NOT need more traffic in these areas. Please do NOT approve this. Judy & Dieter Krausser, Stine, Michelle From: Randall, Diana Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2021 8:31 AM To: Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael Subject: FW: Kai -1st and Tangerine General Plan Amendment/Rezoning Good morning, Please see below for constituent comments. Sincerely, Diana Randall Executive Assistant Town Manager, Mayor and Council -----Original Message ----- From: Margie Pasero Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 20215:04 PM To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov> Subject: Kai -1st and Tangerine General Plan Amendment/Rezoning Hello, My husband and I are very concerned about the amendment/rezoning for 1st and Tangerine property. The Reflections neighborhood enjoys a unique peacefulness with the open space and wildlife across the street and the beautiful mountain views. Building homes, rental casitas or senior care facilities would completely disrupt the beauty and peace of this neighborhood as well as adding more traffic and noise. I hope you will reconsider this ill-advised plan and listen to the concerns of the community. Thank you, Margie and George Pasero Margie Pasero **************************************** "There is only the unfolding, the opening ever happening. All else are thoughts — lollipops for the mind." (Em Claire) Stine, Michelle From: Randall, Diana Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2021 8:31 AM To: Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael Subject: FW: Kai rezoning Good morning, Please see below for constituent comments. Sincerely, Diana Randall Executive Assistant Town Manager, Mayor and Council -----Original Message ----- From: CHRISTINE GEORGELOS Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 20215:23 PM To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov> Subject: Kai rezoning Hello, I am writing to express my grave concerns about the rezoning project being discussed this evening at the Town Council meeting. I purchased a home five years ago in the Reflections subdivision on Woodburne Avenue. I enjoy the neighborhood feel and the beautiful views of the Catalinas. I invested my almost entire savings to purchase this home as I fell in love with the neighborhood, the school district, the views, and the proximity of resources and businesses that are close but not in my backyard. The openness and space surrounding my neighborhood is one of the reasons 1 decided to buy my home and raise my family here in Oro Valley. The idea of rezoning nearby plots of land for commercial use, especially one potentially right outside my backyard on Woodburn Avenue in the future, is very unsettling and would completely ruin all of the things I love about my home. The traffic would increase that's making outdoor activities such as bike riding, walking to the park, and playing dangerous for children as the traffic would increase and take away all of the things we love about living here. In addition, I am concerned about how this change to my neighborhood would lower my property value and affect resale of my own property when I retire and it is time to downsize. If approval of the Kai rezoning plan will set any precedent for rezoning of any of the parcels on Woodburn Avenue or Rancho Vistoso Boulevard for commercial use then I would like to emphatically express that I am against this as a tax paying community member. Please take my concerns under consideration when voting on this matter. Thank you, Christine Georgelos Sent from my iPhone Stine, Michelle From: Randall, Diana Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2021 8:31 AM To: Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael Subject: FW: Concerns for rezoning Good morning, Please see below for constituent comments. Sincerely, Diana Randall Executive Assistant Town Manager, Mayor and Council From: Lynn thompson Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 20214:24 PM To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov> Subject: Concerns for rezoning Hello, I have some concerns about the rezoning the parcels of land across the street from my home. I live on the corner of Woodburne and New Dawn Ave.. It has the most beautiful view of the mountains and would hate to see that disappear by future building across the street. There is also traffic on Woodburne that makes it noisy when outside in the backyard and any future building will double it. I believe that rezoning these areas would most certainly hurt the future of the neighborhood. Please reconsider approving the rezoning of these land parcels. Thank you for your time Lynn Thompson IF YOU DON'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS, PLEASE, FEEL FREE ... TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM Stine, Michelle From: Randall, Diana Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2021 8:32 AM To: Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael Subject: FW: General Plan Amendment Good morning, Please see below for constituent comments. Sincerely, Diana Randall Executive Assistant Town Manager, Mayor and Council -----Original Message ----- From: Bradley Louis Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 20217:07 PM To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov> Subject: General Plan Amendment To the Mayor and town council members, I am opposed to the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezoning for the Kai parcel located at 1st and Tangerine. I don't believe this would be in the best interest of our community. What are we trying to be, a rental community? Our we all about finding revenue at the expense of quality of living? The owners of that land have the right to have it developed but they don't have the right to change our General plan to make more money and our city government should not be a party to that. Are we so poor at managing our resources that we constantly have to reach out to developers to finance us. What about the strain on our infrastructure, water, police and fire department. I encourage every one of you to reject this effort. Sincerely, Brad Louis OV resident since '05 Sent from my iPad Stine, Michelle From: Randall, Diana Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2021 8:32 AM To: Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael Subject: FW: Rezoning Good morning, Please see below for constituent comments. Sincerely, Diana Randall Executive Assistant Town Manager, Mayor and Council From: Daniel Gurrieri Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 20217:14 PM To: Town Council <council@orovaIleyaz.gov> Subject: Rezoning I live in the Horizons neighborhood north of the Safeway.The traffic and congestion at 1st and Tangerine is already at an all time high. The addition of residential zoning in the three identified parcels will just make a bad situation worse. The parcel just north of the Safeway is a problem in that there is no frontage to safely get in and out of the area.There are accidents or near accidents daily at the exit of the Safeway currently. Shoe horning houses in this area does not make sense. We have been lucky no one has been killed at this intersection. Please reconsider rezoning these areas. Thank you = Virus -free. www.avast.com Stine, Michelle From: Randall, Diana Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 20214:30 PM To: Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael Subject: FW: Concerns for rezoning Good afternoon, Please see below for constituent comments. Sincerely, Diana Randall Executive Assistant Town Manager, Mayor and Council From: Lynn thompson Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 20214:24 PM To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov> Subject: Concerns for rezoning Hello, I have some concerns about the rezoning the parcels of land across the street from my home. I live on the corner of Woodburne and New Dawn Ave.. It has the most beautiful view of the mountains and would hate to see that disappear by future building across the street. There is also traffic on Woodburne that makes it noisy when outside in the backyard and any future building will double it. I believe that rezoning these areas would most certainly hurt the future of the neighborhood. Please reconsider approving the rezoning of these land parcels. Thank you for your time Lynn Thompson IF YOU DON'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS, PLEASE, FEEL FREE ... TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM Stine, Michelle From: Randall, Diana Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2021 10:51 AM To: Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael Subject: FW: Proposed amendment to General Plan for Kai -1st and Tangerine Good morning, Please see below for constituent comments. Sincerely, Diana Randall Executive Assistant Town Manager, Mayor and Council From: Ulanowicz, Susan Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 202110:36 AM To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov> Subject: Proposed amendment to General Plan for Kai -1st and Tangerine Hello council: I strongly object to the plan to change the parcels along Woodbourne and adjacent to the Safeway plaza to high density residential use! (the parcel on the South side of Tangerine will not pose problems as severe as those with similar use on the North side) These are my reasons: Traffic getting out on Rancho Vistoso Blvd is already excessive, so that it is difficult to exit from Woodbourne onto RVB, or to turn into or out of the Safeway parking lot. People have to take unsafe chances at the Safeway entrance and the intersection of RVG and Woodbourne already and I have been in several near -miss situations. It's dangerous and irresponsible to add more complexity in that area. Another intersection or traffic light will not work there, being so close to the light at Tangerine. I don't care what any computer models show, I drive it several times a day, and know it to be a fact. ** Remember, any traffic studies done in the past 12 months are invalid because of the reduction in travel during COVID restrictions, and reduction in the number of Winter residents. This cannot pass any environmental impact studies. Wildlife is already quite constricted and has had to resort to frequent visits in the neighborhoods looking for space, food and water. These are the big mammals, not birds or squirrels. Residential, especially of the density proposed, is too big a threat to them, and it will force more human/wildlife encounters, not to mention that it is just wrong to hem them in with nowhere to go except across Tangerine. Water usage is much higher with these high density developments. We continue to push this water system way beyond its capability with very short-sighted decisions. The buffer from Tangerine is already thin. If this amendment is passed, there is now more precedent to undermine the Town Plan and radically over -populate the area to the benefit of a few developers at the expense of the larger stakeholder group. We don't live in Phoenix for a reason. The reason we had the major overhaul of council members two elections ago was that we object to this disregard for the residents' well being in order to benefit developers with their undue influence over Council. Were we wrong to elect you? Thank you for your consideration and time. Susan Ulanowicz OV resident in Overlook neighborhood Confidentiality Note: This message is intended only for the use of then am ed recipients) and may contain confidential and/or proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete this message. Any unauthorized use of the information contained in this message is prohibited. Stine, Michelle From: Standish, Michael Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2021 9:38 AM To: Stine, Michelle Subject: FW: Attempt to change zoning near Tangerine Rd. and First From: Ocien, Hannah <hoden@orovalleyaz.gov> Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 20219:30 AM To: Standish, Michael <mstandish@orovalleyaz.gov> Cc: Vella, Bayer <bvella@orovalleyaz.gov> Subject: FW: Attempt to change zoning near Tangerine Rd. and First Good morning Mike, Can you please forward the email below to Town Council regarding regular agenda item #1 for tomorrow's meeting? Thank you. Best, Hannah Hannah Oden Senior Planner Town of Oro Valley 11000 N. La Canada Dr. Oro Valley, AZ 85737 (520) 229-4814 Work Cell: (520) 488-0906 www.orovalleyaz.00v From: PATRICIA KELLY < Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 20219:03 AM To: Oden, Hannah <hoden@orovallevaz.gov> Subject: Attempt to change zoning near Tangerine Rd. and First Hannah, good morning. Upon hearing developers are attempting to have zoning changed near our Horizon neighborhood, we would like to make certain that our input is heard. We have had this conversation before with OV, but now see a different attempt with the Kai area and fear that this cancer will spread. In an effort to have our concerns put forth, let us list out a few very general, but highly important considerations: 1. The traffic; already at epidemic proportions at Tangerine and 1st. More lights is not the answer as all that does is back traffic up and cause another problem call congestion, more air pollution as the cars idle causing more frustration for our current residents 2. The plats of land were originally set forth the way they are because residents need services; we have few. We need restaurants, grocery stores, gas stations, retail stores, and that is why the residential population drives out of OV to get these services. 3. Curiosity for the levy rates of commercial vs. residential? Why do you continue to attempt to open our currently platted land to residential building when it was set aside for either native growth and wild life living or commercial use. And why aren't these residential taxes used for road repair, etc. rather than golf courses that went south years ago due to mismanagement. 4. As residents, we see a real leaning in to residential construction, developers and owners. It would appear at first blush that there is (could be) a conflict of interest. 5. And of course, apartments, senior care facilities speak to multi level structures. We moved here years ago to enjoy the views of our mountains and the wildlife. Each year this seems to diminish and we feel cheated. And additionally we fear the loss of our home value; we purchased our home for the view and that is what brought value to it. 6. Noise generated from multi family facilities creates havoc. We moved to OV for the peace and quiet and certainly did not anticipate this type of growth. Growth of apartment and senior facilities certainly does not equate to progress. 7. The air quality from exhaust fumes and emissions from multi family facilities will hugely impact our community. 8. With 2.5 cars per household generally speaking, all we can anticipate are major traffic problems in our once peaceful community 9. OV has 25-30 assisted living facilities, with most of them having census far below their optimum levels. This tells us straight up that this is not what we need. We may be thought of as a semi retirement community, but the numbers do not lie. 10. Additional light pollution will require shades on all windows of current home owners to reduce illumination glare. Another point as to the impact on current home owners. 11. It was reported in the Voice, OV newspaper, that over the course of the last year, or so, that rezoning assemblies were held and all were approved by the City Council. We are at a loss as to how that is possible. Certainly looks like a conflict of interest, with anger from the audience running high. live and let live .... a slogan to live with! Patty a4L MaP-/KdUY Stine, Michelle From: Standish, Michael Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2021 8:15 AM To: Stine, Michelle Subject: FW: Kai commercial Property From: Vella, Bayer <bvella@orovalleyaz.gov> Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 20218:04 AM To: Standish, Michael <mstandish@orovalleyaz.gov>; Oden, Hannah <hoden@orovalleyaz.gov> Cc: Jacobs, Mary <mjacobs@orovalleyaz.gov>; Melcher, Paul <pmelcher@orovalleyaz.gov> Subject: FW: Kai commercial Property From: Anna Nappi Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 20217:28 AM To: Winfield, Joe <iwinfield@orovallevaz.eov>; Barrett, Melanie <mbarrett@orovallevaz.gov>; Bohen, Timothy <tbohenPorovallevaz.aov>; Greene, Harry <hgreene@orovallevaz.aov>; Jones -Ivey, Joyce <"ou nes_ ivev@orovallevaz.gov>; Nicolson, Josh <inicolson@orovallevaz.eov>; Solomon, Steve <ssolomon@orovallevaz.gov>; Vella, Bayer <bvella@orovallevaz.aov> Subject: Kai commercial Property I am opposed to the General Plan Amendment change to allow residential on the commercial property at 1st and Tangerine. The negative economic impact of Covid on local businesses is temporary. Houses approved under the prior Council are still under construction. New apartments will be built at the Marketplace. The additional businesses that are permitted under your recently approved Code Amendments could dramatically change for the Kai parcel. We should not make decisions to rezone this and other commercial properties when the financial impact of this new construction is unknown. Please vote against the General Plan Amendment and rezoning. Stine, Michelle From: Randall, Diana Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2021 8:34 AM To: Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael Subject: FW: Rezoning Concerns Good morning, Please see below for constituent comments. Sincerely, Diana Randall Executive Assistant Town Manager, Mayor and Council From: Midobuche, Eva Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 20214:36 AM To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov> Cc: Midobuche, Eva Subject: Rezoning Concerns February 2, 2021 Dear Oro Valley Town Council Members: As a resident of the Horizons neighborhood, I write this note to express my concern over the vote you are considering taking on February 3, 2021 regarding the Kai -11 & Tangerine General Plan Amendment/Rezoning. This will set a dangerous precedent for rezoning two nearby parcels—NW corner of Rancho Vistoso Blvd & Tangerine Rd and the parcel just north of Safeway. The traffic flow is already very heavy in both of these two mentioned areas and that is not including traffic from the new school that will be opening soon and the new surrounding neighborhood. Trying to exit the Horizons neighborhood with only 2 exits into Rancho Vistoso Blvd is already very difficult at best since one exit has to turn right (north) and the other can turn north but if going south has to cross Rancho Vistoso and has to wait for those making a U- turn --turning left (south) with oncoming heavy traffic in both directions—a bit dangerous. Many of our residents in this area are elderly retirees and adding a heavier traffic flow due to new construction can be very dangerous for them and all of us. The Horizons neighborhood will be boxed in as traffic on Rancho Vistoso increases. There is no other way to exit the neighborhood except the two exits into Rancho Vistoso Blvd. The traffic exiting Safeway into Rancho Vistoso Blvd has two exits and only one can turn south which is very difficult to do, so most turn north (right). This traffic adds congestion to the traffic from the Woodburne Ave neighborhoods since U-turns are being made here or at the Echo Valley Horizons exit which then affects the Horizon residents since this adds to the oncoming traffic which already causes delays in this area and to those who also need to make a U-turn to go south. New construction on the NW corner of Rancho Vistoso Blvd & Tangerine Rd and the very small parcel just north of Safeway would heavily impact and add to the traffic congestion. Additional traffic in such a small, dense, and congested area will only cause hazardous living and driving conditions to the residents. Is the Council not taking into account the welfare and safety of its residents? Residents in this area take pride in the beauty and safety of this area. How can the small area north of Safeway not be dense and congested with any type of construction? Noise, density, safety, and the beauty of the area should be taken into consideration in voting and planning. Also, take into account trying to exit out of Horizons. Turning left and then making a U-turn with all the new traffic will be impossible to do and how far will these residents have to go to be able to go south on Rancho Vistoso? Horizons is an established neighborhood of over 20 years and being boxed in is not what residents in this neighborhood had envisioned and definitely do not want --especially in case of an emergency. Please also take this into consideration when voting. I hope that as Oro Valley Council Members you take the time to listen to the concerns of residents in the affected areas. These residents have made a commitment to preserving a safe, secure, tranquil lifestyle and an appreciation for the natural beauty and wildlife of the community. If you need to contact me I can be reached at at Thank you, Eva Midobuche Dr. Eva Midobuche Professor Emeritus Stine, Michelle From: Randall, Diana Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2021 8:34 AM To: Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael Subject: FW: Rezoning Concerns Good morning, Please see below for constituent comments. Sincerely, Diana Randall Executive Assistant Town Manager, Mayor and Council From: Benavides, Alfredo Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 20214:12 AM To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov> Cc: Benavides, Alfred( Subject: Rezoning Concerns Members of the Oro Valley Town Council: We have become aware of plans to rezone nearby parcels through the Kai —1'( & Tangerine General Plan Amendment/Rezoning plan. Our concerns are based on our observations of the traffic patterns on Rancho Vistoso Blvd. and the impact on the Horizons neighborhood. These areas pose a danger in terms of traffic flow—especially the area north of Woodburne Avenue. However, the parcel north of the Safeway Shopping Center is very much a danger since it would pose several problems for the community. Particularly: 1. This parcel of land is extremely small to sustain any type of residential or commercial expansion. 2. Using it for added residential building (whether apartments or single-family dwellings), would make life very difficult for area residents. Traffic would be difficult to manage since there already is heavy traffic on Rancho Vistoso (in both directions), as well as traffic entering and exiting the Safeway Shopping Center. Add the traffic entering and exiting Woodburne Avenue and Molino Basin as well as Echo Valley, and the potential problems for accidents would be increased substantially. As it is now, traffic exiting the Horizons neighborhood on Molino Basin has to turn right and quickly move into the left lane to make a U-turn to go to Safeway or Tangerine Rd. 3. Added traffic entering and exiting from the aforementioned parcel, Woodburne Avenue, and the Safeway Shopping Center, as well as that coming in from Tangerine would further complicate traffic patterns and endanger more lives. Getting out of the Horizons neighborhood is already difficult. Adding more traffic to Rancho Vistoso would create a more dangerous traffic issue. Please take our concerns into consideration as you vote on these issues. your decision will impact our safety and of course the beauty of our neighborhood. We take pride in the area as well as the overall neighborhood and environment. Please take our safety into consideration. I am a resident of the Horizons neighborhood and if you need to contact me you can do so at or at my email: Thank you, Alfredo H. Benavides, PhD Professor Emeritus THE KEG February 3, 2021 Oro Valley Mayor and Town Councilmembers Mr. Bayer Vella, AICP Town of Oro Valley Planning Manager 11000 N. La Canada Dr. Oro Valley, AZ 85737 Dear Honorable Mayor, Vice Mayor, Councilmembers, and Mr. Vella, The Keg Steakhouse + Bar has been in operation at The Oro Valley Marketplace for over 10 years. Our restaurant provides a unique dining experience to the residents of Oro Valley. We also provide jobs to Oro Valley residents and other residents living in Pima County. During our years of operation, we have had to deal with numerous retailers closing throughout the OV Marketplace. We are encouraged by the plans to bring additional residences and hotels to The OV Marketplace as well as its redesign and brand change into The Oro Valley Village Center. We see that these plans work well together, and we support the General Plan Amendment and Rezoning for Silverhawke block 5 casitas plan. There are hundreds of thousands of square feet of available space in the shopping center at V and Tangerine and along Oracle Rd, all these projects are still needed and will only help to support our business and help attract new businesses to Oro Valley. We believe this is a win for our entire community. We need empty land to be converted to help keep our community thriving. It would be a wasted opportunity to keep this as a retail, office or research and development use, especially with so much other, currently unused, commercial land nearby. We really appreciate your diligence and review of this proposal, but we ask you to please vote in favor of the General Plan Amendment and Rezoning for Silverhawke block 5 casitas plan Sincerely and Respectfully, Joshua C. Bishop General Manager The Keg Steakhouse + Bar KEG RESTAURANTS LTD. 560 KING ST. W I TORONTO, ON I M5V 01-5 1 T: 416-695-2400 1 kegsteakhouse.com Stine, Michelle From: Randall, Diana Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2021 11:53 AM To: Standish, Michael; Stine, Michelle Subject: FW: "Casita" Definition Needed for Zoning Purposes Please see below for constituent comments Sincerely, Diana Randall Executive Assistant Town Manager, Mayor and Council From: Patrick Mullol Sent: Thursday, February 4, 202111:49 AM To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov> Subject: "Casita" Definition Needed for Zoning Purposes To Whom It May Concern: I participated in last night's Zoom Town Council Meeting and am concerned about the discussion regarding the proposed Kai development located Southeast of the intersection of ls` and Tangerine. While the proposal seemed to be well thought out and reasonable, the discussion highlighted an extremely critical deficiency in the Oro Valley Zoning Code. Specifically, there is no definition of a Casita. This becomes particularly troublesome if the proposal were approved and the same logic applied to the other two C-1 parcels in question. I did some online research for a definition of a Casita, and it simply refers to a small house. One definition stated it could be up to 1200 sq ft. The Kai plan showed Casitas which were much smaller, and an Oro Valley definition would have to address an floorspace area limitation. As a side note: I grew up in a family of 6 children and two adults in a 3 -bedroom 1 bath house that was 1200 sq ft. Further, no definition I found of a Casita stated a limitation to a single story. So without a clear definition of what Oro Valley recognizes as a "Casita," applying a Kai development decision to the other two C-1 parcels would have been wrong. For example, if the Kai proposal had been accepted and the decision applied to the other two parcels then future development would not have been limited to single story structures! As an Oro Valley homeowner since 1996 and a resident living near the Woodburne C-1 parcel, I find that the development of multi -story "Casitas" in that parcel would be unacceptable. Respectfully Patrick J. Mullov ORO VALLEY AUDIOLOGY HEARINTUCSON.COM 2542 E. Vistoso Commerce Loop Oro Valley, AZ 85755 February 3, 2021 INC Oro Valley Mayor and Town Councilmembers Mr. Bayer Vella, AICP Town of Oro Valley Planning Manager 11000 N. La Canada Dr. Oro Valley, AZ 85737 Dear Honorable Mayor, Councilmembers, and Mr. Vella, I have been a resident of Oro Valley since 1996. My husband and I have raised our boys in the community. I have also owned small business in Oro Valley for 23 years. We support the Silverhawk block 5 General Plan amendment and rezoning. It makes sense to have additional housing density at this location instead of a 2 story employment, warehouse, distribution, or office facility considering its close proximity to the existing Silverhawke subdivision. There is currently other options and alternatives for those uses in this area. Having more people in this location will help our struggling retailers and restaurants. We also need housing options to help attract other employers and provide different housing options like this to attract younger professionals to help Oro Valley continue to grow. This site is a good location for the Casita use with it's direct access to Tangerine Rd. The Casita option proposed on the Silverhawke Block 5 would be positive project for our entire community. As one of your constituents and voters I would request that you please vote in support of the Silverhawke Block 5 Casita General Plan amendment and rezoning. Thank you, I T Sig ature Dr. Judy L. Huch, AuD Printed Name Contact Info Stine, Michelle From: Randall, Diana Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2021 12:45 PM To: Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael Subject: FW: Please Reopen Pusch Ridge Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Please see below for constituent comments. Sincerely, Diana Randall Executive assistant Town Manager, Mayor and Council From: Carolyn Weinig Sent: Thursday, February 4, 202112:28 PM To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov> Cc: Jacobs, Mary <mjacobs@orovalleyaz.gov> Subject: Please Reopen Pusch Ridge Dear Council Members and Town Manager Jacobs - I was hoping to address you, the Mayor and the staff last night, but my blue card was never called. Hopefully I'll be able to do so on February 17. My name is Carolyn Weinig and my husband Steve and I have owned a home on the Pusch Ridge Golf Course since 2012. I want to try to make 3 points in this email: 1) 1 am also a member of the 50 -member Quails Women's Golf League that has made Pusch Ridge its home for over 30 years — up until it was pulled out from under us last April 1— unannounced. This league plays year-round, accounting for at least 20-50 rounds of golf/week at least when the course used to be open year-round. The EI Conquistador Patio Home community held an annual April 15 Tax Day golf tournament at Pusch Ridge for many years, using every golf cart made available and paying whatever the Town chose to charge. The Town closed the course last year before our scheduled event — no notice given. My point is, the course had a regular clientele that will return when the course is reopened. 2) The 3 remaining public 18 -hole courses in Oro Valley are operating at OVER capacity. Just try to get a morning tee time on any of these courses! I have to Congratulate this council for voting to keep the other 36 holes of golf open in Oro Valley to take advantage of this huge surge in golf growth. Golf fed the town coffers during this pandemic downturn, while the community center and many of the town's other facilities were closed. Golf is the perfect healthy outdoor activity, especially for seniors. And there are lots of us in Oro Valley. Pusch Ridge wasn't given the opportunity to participate in this golf revival. It could have made the town money, too. If profit is your goal, I just ask, is the new $1.45 million playground profitable? Or, the Aquatic Center? 3) The EI Conquistador Resort has to compete in the greater Tucson market with the likes of Lowe's Ventana Canyon, Marriott Starr Pass, Westin La Paloma and the Omni Tucson National, all of which have adjacent golf courses and none of which bring business to Oro Valley. Think about that. It is not in Oro Valley's best interest for the EI Conquistador Resort to fail. We urge you to reconsider. Please work with those of us who are passionate about the success of Oro Valley golf and the future of Pusch Ridge. "This golf course is in our nature, we hope it's in yours!" How would you vote if you lived on this Oro Valley gem? It is time to do the right thing. With respect for all you do for Oro Valley, Carolyn Weinig Oro Valley, AZ 85704 My best, Carolyn Stine, Michelle From: Standish, Michael Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2021 12:58 PM To: Stine, Michelle Subject: FW: What I had intended to say Attachments: You know who I am and my position on the Pusch Ridge Golf Course.pdf Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged From: Anthony DAngelo Sent: Thursday, February 4, 20219:34 AM To: Standish, Michael <mstandish@orovalleyaz.gov> Subject: What I had intended to say Hi Mike: Please share the attached with the town council. This was what I had intended to share. Thanks, Tony D'Angelo I You know who I am and my position on the Pusch Ridge Golf Course. This debate has gone on long enough — it is time for you to make -a -decision. The lease option with HSL is off the table. Why you would have ever expected them to take this on given the negative effects of the pandemic and your lack of care over the facility. The town now remains completely responsible. You have two choices — restore the golf course and return it to operations with the help of our HOAs, or Formalize your abandonment strategy and allow it to continue as a nine -hole dog park. Your town manager will formally present you with these two options next week. Although none of us know exactly what the numbers will look like, I am sure the costs of abandonment will be greater than any perceived benefit. For over six years we have all suffered through the uncertainty and ranker over town - owned golf courses. What has been gained? How has the town been improved? Who won? As temporary stewards of town assets your job should be to first, do no harm. For those of you who have taken the time to visit Pusch Ridge Golf, can you honestly say that this facility is something to be proud of? We get it that we are a small community that most residents of Oro Valley never see. However, the EI Conquistador Resort is a vital contributor to the town's economy and your inaction is doing nothing to help them weather the pandemic or attract business. If you continue this path, you may lose the only 4 diamond resort in this town. Again, enough is enough. Act! If you choose to restore golf, we are committed to help you make it a success. If you choose abandonment, then we all lose. Thank you for allowing me to speak and thank you for your service. Tony D'Angelo Stine, Michelle From: Randall, Diana Sent: Friday, February 5, 2021 3:21 PM To: Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael Subject: FW: Save the 9 Hole Golf Course at Pusch Peak Good afternoon, Please see below for constituent comments. Sincerely, Diana Randall Executive Assistant Town Manager, Mi or and Council From: myronlm@aol.corr Sent: Friday, February 5, 20212:36 PM To: Winfield, Joe <jwinfield@orovalleyaz.gov>; Barrett, Melanie <mbarrett@orovalleyaz.gov>; Town Council <counci I@oroval leyaz.gov> Cc: Jacobs, Mary <mjacobs@orovalleyaz.gov>; Diaz-Trahan, Kristy <kdiaz-trahan@orovalleyaz.gov> Subject: Save the 9 Hole Golf Course at Pusch Peak Dear Mayor Wndfield, Vice Mayor Barrett, and Council Members: We are home owners of an EI Conquistador Patio Home bordering the 9 hole golf that is under consideration to become an Oro Valley open space. Should this occur, we believe this will cause significant losses to the City in a number of ways as well as to us personally and to our EI Conquistador Patio Home community. We also believe that by finding ways for the 9 hole golf course to remain and be maintained, it can prove to be a win / win for all concerned parties as follows: - The golf course adjacent homes have maintained and improved in value since they were built and therefore maintained and increased their property tax base over time. There is no doubt home values will decline if the golf course is abandoned for any reason. Loss in home values mean a needless loss in the property tax revenue base. Keeping the 9 hole golf course will be a win /win for all. All will lose to some degree if the golf course is converted to an open space because it only creates a cost to the City and its tax payers not revenue, it causes parking problems in the neighborhood, attracts wild life dangerous to neighborhood pets, and creates potential safety problems by providing direct back yard access for property owners who don't have fences. - In snow bird season, we have older guests visit our home. They, like many, come to Oro Valley each year and play golf at the Pusch Ridge 9 hole course which is more suited to aging stamina and body joints. This golf course is one of the reasons that Oro Valley is a "go to city" for them in addition to the City's mountain view, public safety history, well maintained streets, excellent restaurants and other stores and businesses where most of their need are met. All of this translates into substantial sales tax revenue for the City from its seasonal guests. Taking away the 9 hole golf course will be like removing anchor stores from shopping malls. Future Sales Tax losses can be avoided by 1 keeping the golf course as part of the reason why Oro Valley is N. W. Tucson's most attractive place to live, work, visit, or return to each year. - Oro Valley has a reputation for being the best run and one of the most desirable cities to reside in Arizona. It plans well both long and short term, it is fiscally sound, and it is responsive to the needs and desires of its citizens. As such it finds a way to support non income producing libraries, public parks, police and fire departments and public safety programs, and finds way to support public events. The Pusch Ridge 9 Hole Golf course should not be excluded from the group of important facilities available in the City. It is our hope that those in City Management could step into our shoes as residents of the EI Conquistador Patio Homes and fully recognize, as the members of our small neighborhood do, the value of keeping and maintaining the Pusch Ridge 9 hole golf course and its contribution to the city's image of meeting the needs and desires of its citizens. - Certainly creative minds can find a ways to mitigate the associated costs of managing and maintaining the Pro Shop and Golf Course beyond the limited financial support they have already found. If you haven't already, we suggest a "corporate sponsor" be solicited to partner with the City for support and naming rights for the golf course. Larger cities like Los Angles, Atlanta, and Dallas for example do this with their Staples Center, Mercedes Benz Stadium, and AT&T Stadium. Local or regional businesses like Southwest Airlines, Cox Communication, Chase Bank , Blue Cross Blue Shield, Geico, Sundt, etc. have the leadership and local advertising budgets where they would be proud to have there name permanently recognized as a company supporting golf, outdoor activities, a lifestyle of health and exercise, etc. along with their business products or services. It would be a constant source of publicity for them which would be further enhanced by their direct association with the town of Oro Valley. We offer our comments with the hope they will receive your serious consideration as you determine the best long term path to support all Oro Valley residents. Sincerely, Myron & Wendy Morris Oro Valley Stine, Michelle From: Randall, Diana Sent: Monday, February 8, 2021 12:56 PM To: Stine, Michelle; Standish, Michael Cc: Hynd, Jessica Subject: FW: PUSCH RIDGE GOLF COURSE Attachments: Pusch Ridge speech on 2-3-21.docx Good afternoon, Please see below and attached for constituent comments Sincerely, Diana Randall Executive Assistant Town Manager, Mayor and Council From: Sandy Carter Sent: Monday, February 8, 202112:28 PM To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov> Cc: 'Anthony DAngele Subject: PUSCH RIDGE GOLF COURSE Attached are my comments regarding the status of the Pusch Ridge Golf Course, some of which I was not able share with you on 2/3/21 due to time restrictions. In addition, when walking on the cart path the other day I saw a dead fox half way down the V fairway that had obviously been attacked and left for dead (and signs of being dinner for other prey). I am not sure who YOU need to call to have it removed, but since there is no patrol or maintenance on the course, it could eventually spread disease if a homeowner tries to remove it. Also, there are several critter holes on the course that if not seen while walking, could trigger a person stepping in them, hence a sprained ankle, or worse. We are really concerned about the your liability before something serious could happen. Please take care of the course that you purchased for the community to use. It needs immediate attention! Sandy Carter, President Shadows of the Ridge #2 (East side of the 8`" fairway) Mr. Mayor and Council: I am Sandy Carter, President of Shadows of the Ridge #2 My husband and I moved to Oro Valley from Alaska in February of 2005 after searching the Southwest for 2 years prior, before finding a new home site. We found our home at Shadows of the Ridge on the most beautiful green golf course. We were happy to find that the course (at that time) was open through the summer and was well maintained year round. With the snowbirds leaving in the spring and not returning until fall, we understood why the course became closed for 3 months during the summer. However, the past several years the summer closure has extended to 6 months. And now, it has been left to be destroyed by the extremely hot summer, no regular watering schedule, and unfortunately no monsoon rains this year. We are concerned about the loss of value of our (and our neighbors') property as we look right out on the straw-colored dead grass on the 8th fairway & green behind our home. If this course is not given attention immediately, it could be lost forever. This would be a critical loss for the City: loss of a valuable asset, loss of income, and loss of a landmark used in many marketing ads drawing people to the community and the greater Tucson area. We are concerned about the loss of value of our property, hence the loss of tax revenue for Oro Valley. When we moved here we were looking at our home as an investment with expected growth and appreciation. We moved here for the golf course, not for having a straw-colored field to look at. Itis even referenced in our CCR's that we acknowledge we are on a golf course with cart paths that we were to be mindful of, as well as no trespassing on the greens or fairways. We are not in favor of an open space facility. We are concerned for the privacy of our property and the people who would be using the facility. As it is now, many people from other neighborhoods come here to walk their dogs, but do not clean up after them. After the Big Horn Fire this past summer, we are concerned that the course, if left in its current condition, could become a potential fire hazard so close to many of our homes. As it was, we were on alert to vacate our homes had the winds shifted and come from the north forcing the fire our direction. It is a crying shame that the city has such a beautiful icon here in Oro Valley left to deteriorate almost beyond repair. Even at the entrance of EI Conquistador Way, east of the stop light, some of the larger trees along the sides of the road have died and been removed — not replaced, therefore leaving gaps in the landscape. Several of the trees have large clumps of mistletoe left to continue to grow and eventually kill off the remaining trees. Even the newer cactus and plants most recently planted are showing signs of stress from lack of water. The entire golf course grounds and perimeters have an overall run down appearance. This is not the image we want to look at or wish to portray. I would like to see some of our tax dollars put to use here. Please return the Pusch Ridge golf course to its original condition so that people can use the course as intended. Since nothing has been decided, please make a decision now. Enough is enough. Thank you.