HomeMy WebLinkAboutPackets - Council Packets (1509)
AGENDA
ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL
REGULAR SESSION
FEBRUARY 17, 2021
ONLINE ZOOM MEETING
Click link to join:
https://orovalley.zoom.us/j/96070780591
To attend via phone only, dial 1-346-248-7799 then enter Meeting/Webinar ID: 960 7078 0591
The Town recently updated its Zoom capability to allow for increased public attendance and to better facilitate the
Town’s virtual meetings. When you log in to the meeting you will be added as an attendee. You will be able to
address the Town Council during the “Call to Audience,” public hearing and public comment items on the agenda. If
you wish to address the Council during those parts of the agenda, select “Raise your hand” from the Zoom controls
and wait until you are called upon to speak by the Mayor. Town staff will then unmute your microphone and camera.
For additional information about the Town’s Zoom meetings, visit
https://www.orovalleyaz.gov/Government/Departments/Town-Clerk/Zoom-meeting-attendance
Executive Sessions – Upon a vote of the majority of the Town Council, the Council may enter into Executive
Sessions pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes §38-431.03 (A)(3) to obtain legal advice on matters listed on the
Agenda.
REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS
COUNCIL REPORTS
Spotlight on Youth
TOWN MANAGER'S REPORT
The Mayor and Council may consider and/or take action on the items listed below:
ORDER OF BUSINESS: MAYOR WILL REVIEW THE ORDER OF THE MEETING
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
CALL TO AUDIENCE – At this time, any member of the public is allowed to address the Mayor and Town Council
CALL TO AUDIENCE – At this time, any member of the public is allowed to address the Mayor and Town Council
on any issue not listed on today’s agenda. Pursuant to the Arizona Open Meeting Law, individual Council
Members may ask Town Staff to review the matter, ask that the matter be placed on a future agenda, or respond
to criticism made by speakers. However, the Mayor and Council may not discuss or take legal action on matters
raised during “Call to Audience.” In order to speak during “Call to Audience” please specify what you wish to
discuss when completing the blue speaker card.
PRESENTATIONS
CONSENT AGENDA
(Consideration and/or possible action)
A.Minutes - February 3, 2021
B.Resolution No. (R)21-07, approving a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for fiscal years 2021/22 and
2022/23 between the Town of Oro Valley and the Public Safety Employee Group
C.Resolution No. (R)21-08, approving the Agenda Committee assignment for the period of March 1, 2021,
to May 31, 2021
REGULAR AGENDA
1.PRESENTATION, DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING THE PUSCH 9 GOLF COURSE
FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS (The Council may bring forth general topics for future meeting agendas. Council may
not discuss, deliberate or take any action on the topics presented pursuant to ARS 38-431.02H)
ADJOURNMENT
The Mayor and Council may, at the discretion of the meeting chairperson, discuss any Agenda item.
POSTED: 2/10/21 at 5:00 p.m. by pp
When possible, a packet of agenda materials as listed above is available for public inspection at least 24 hours prior to the Council meeting in
the office of the Town Clerk between the hours of 8:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m.
The Town of Oro Valley complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If any person with a disability needs any type of
accommodation, please notify the Town Clerk’s Office at least five days prior to the Council meeting at 229-4700.
INSTRUCTIONS TO SPEAKERS
Members of the public have the right to speak during any posted Public Hearing. However, those items not listed
as a Public Hearing are for consideration and action by the Town Council during the course of their business
meeting. Members of the public may be allowed to speak on these topics at the discretion of the Chair.
In accordance with Amendment #2 of the Mayoral Proclamation of Emergency issued on March 27, 2020, the
following restrictions have been placed on all public meetings until further notice:
1. In-person attendance by members of the public is prohibited.
2. Members of the public can either watch the public meeting
online https://www.orovalleyaz.gov/town/departments/town-clerk/meetings-and-agendas or, if they would like to
participate in the meeting (e.g. speak at Call to Audience or speak on a Regular Agenda item), they can attend the
meeting and participate via the on-line meeting application, Zoom, https://orovalley.zoom.us/j/96070780591 , or
may participate telephonically only by dialing 1-346-248-7799 then enter Meeting ID: 960 7078 0591 prior to or
during the posted meeting.
3. If a member of the public would like to speak at either Call to Audience or on a Regular Agenda item, please
"Raise Your Hand" during the meeting when the Chair announces that it is the appropriate time to do so. For
those participating in the meeting through Zoom, place your cursor towards the bottom, middle of the page and
look for the "Raise Hand" icon and click on it to "Raise Your Hand" to speak. For those participating via phone
only, press *9 to "Raise Your Hand".
4. All members of the public who participate in the Zoom meeting either with video or telephonically will enter the
meeting with microphones muted. For those participating via computer/tablet/phone device, you may choose
whether to turn your video on or not. Those participating via computer/tablet/phone device can click the “Raise
Your Hand” button during the Call to the Public or Regular Agenda item, and the Chair will call on you in order.
For those participating by phone, you can press *9, which will show the Chair that your hand is raised. When you
are recognized at the meeting by the Chair, your microphone will be unmuted by a member of staff and you will
have three minutes to speak before your microphone is again muted.
5. If a member of the public would like to submit written comments to the Town Council for their consideration prior
to the meeting, please email those comments to mstandish@orovalleyaz.gov no later than sixty minutes before the
public meeting. Those comments will then be electronically distributed to the public body prior to the meeting.
If you have questions, please contact Town Clerk, Mike Standish, at 520-229-4700 or email
at mstandish@orovalleyaz.gov
Thank you for your cooperation.
Town Council Regular Session A.
Meeting Date:02/17/2021
Requested by: Mike Standish Submitted By:Michelle Stine, Town Clerk's Office
Department:Town Clerk's Office
SUBJECT:
Minutes - February 3, 2021
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
N/A
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to approve ( approve with the following changes) the February 3, 2021 minutes.
Attachments
2-3-21 Draft Minutes
D R A F T
MINUTES
ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL
REGULAR AND STUDY SESSION
FEBRUARY 3, 2021
ONLINE ZOOM MEETING
REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Winfield called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Present: Joseph C. Winfield, Mayor
Melanie Barrett, Vice-Mayor
Tim Bohen, Councilmember
Harry Greene, Councilmember
Joyce Jones-Ivey, Councilmember
Steve Solomon, Councilmember
Absent: Josh Nicolson, Councilmember
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Councilmember Greene led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance.
Councilmember Nicolson joined the meeting.
UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS
Town Clerk Mike Standish announced the upcoming Town meetings.
COUNCIL REPORTS
No Council reports were received.
TOWN MANAGER'S REPORT
Town Manager Mary Jacobs reported the following information:
2-3-21 Minutes, Town Council Regular and Study Session 1
Town Manager Mary Jacobs reported the following information:
Information regarding COVID 19 vaccinations could be found at pima.gov
Update on Oro Valley podcast
Status update regarding the Pusch 9 Golf Course discussions
Status update regarding the former Vistoso Golf Course
Vacancy on the Stormwater Utility Commission
ORDER OF BUSINESS
Mayor Winfield reviewed the order of business and stated that the order would stand as posted.
Mayor Winfield provided the guidelines for participation in the Town Council's Regular and Study
Session Zoom meeting.
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
There were no informational items.
CALL TO AUDIENCE
Oro Valley resident Rosa Dailey spoke regarding the Vistoso Golf Course.
Oro Valley resident Don Parce spoke regarding the condition of the Push 9 Golf Course.
Oro Valley resident Patricia Sturmon spoke regarding the Vistoso Golf Course.
Oro Valley resident Rich Molnar spoke regarding the Vistoso Golf Course.
Oro Valley resident Ray Barth spoke regarding the Vistoso Golf Course.
Oro Valley resident Cindy Wicker spoke regarding the Vistoso Golf Course.
Oro Valley resident Dan Tussle, for Jeannee Yermakoff, spoke regarding the Pusch Ridge Golf
Course.
Oro Valley resident Sandy Carter spoke regarding the Pusch Ridge Golf Course.
Oro Valley resident Craig MacKay spoke regarding the Vistoso Golf Course.
Oro Valley resident Paul Sedon spoke regarding the Pusch Ridge Golf Course.
Oro Valley resident Tom Stegman spoke regarding the Vistoso Golf Course.
Oro Valley resident Bill Garner spoke regarding the Vistoso Golf Course.
Oro Valley resident Peter Bell spoke regarding the Pusch Ridge Golf Course.
Oro Valley resident Caryn Hill spoke regarding the Vistoso Golf Course.
Oro Valley resident Teresa Marrow spoke regarding the Vistoso Golf Course.
Oro Valley resident Mark Enzor spoke regarding the Vistoso Golf Course.
2-3-21 Minutes, Town Council Regular and Study Session 2
Oro Valley resident Richard Beam spoke regarding the Vistoso Golf Course.
Oro Valley resident Bruce Baier spoke regarding the Vistoso Golf Course.
Oro Valley resident Bruce DaCosta spoke regarding the Vistoso Golf Course.
Oro Valley resident Niranjan Vescio spoke regarding the Pusch 9 Golf Course.
Oro Valley resident Art Scarla spoke regarding the Pusch 9 Golf Course.
Oro Valley resident Jennifer Semon spoke regarding the Vistoso Golf Course.
Oro Valley resident Kenneth Brown spoke regarding the Vistoso Golf Course.
Oro Valley resident Patrick Tebo spoke regarding the Vistoso Golf Course.
Oro Valley resident Nancy Olson spoke regarding the Vistoso Golf Course.
Oro Valley resident Terry Hart spoke regarding the Vistoso Golf Course.
Oro Valley resident Charlene Donovan spoke regarding the Vistoso Golf Course.
Dave Brown spoke regarding the Pusch 9 Golf Course.
PRESENTATIONS
1.Recognition of outgoing Board and Commission Members
Mayor Winfield recognized the following outgoing Board and Commission members for their service;
David Perkins - Board of Adjustment
Dan Huff - Historic Preservation Commission
Timothy Bohen - Historic Preservation Commission
Eric Thomae - Historic Preservation Commission
Charles Cachoeira - Parks and Recreation Advisory Board
Neal Herst - Planning and Zoning Commission
Richard Hawkinson - Stormwater Utility Commission
Michael DeSantis - Stormwater Utility Commission
Winston Tustison - Water Utility Commission
2.Presentation and possible discussion on the Town's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2020
Christopher Heinfeld of Heinfeld, Meech & Co., P.C. presented item #2 and included the following:
Financial Statements
Audit Approach
Final Notes
CONSENT AGENDA
A.Minutes - January 20, 2021
2-3-21 Minutes, Town Council Regular and Study Session 3
B.Resolution No. (R)21-05, authorizing and approving a subgrantee agreement between the Town of
Oro Valley and the Arizona Department of Homeland Security to fund overtime and mileage under the
Operation Stonegarden program
C.Resolution No. (R)21-06, authorizing and approving a subgrantee agreement between the Town of
Oro Valley and the Arizona Department of Homeland Security to fund equipment under the Operation
Stonegarden program
D.Request for release of Stormwater Utility contingency funds for three minor drainage repairs and/or
rehabilitation projects
Motion by Mayor Joseph C. Winfield, seconded by Councilmember Tim Bohen to approve Consent
Agenda items (A) - (D).
Vote: 7 - 0 Carried
Mayor Winfield recessed the meeting at 7:39 p.m.
Mayor Winfield reconvened the meeting at 7:46 p.m.
Mayor Winfield reviewed collegiality rules as stated in the Town Council Parliamentary Rules and
Procedures.
REGULAR AGENDA
1.DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING THE PROPOSED 1ST AVENUE AND
TANGERINE ROAD GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND REZONING FOR 13.44-ACRES,
LOCATED SOUTH OF TANGERINE ROAD AND APPROXIMATELY 1/4-MILE EAST OF 1ST
AVENUE, PUBLIC COMMENT WILL BE TAKEN
ITEM A. RESOLUTION NO. (R)21-01, TYPE 1 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO CHANGE TWO
KAI-CAPRI SPECIAL AREA POLICIES TO ALLOW R-6 MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
ZONING USES ON A VACANT COMMERCIAL PARCEL (2001085)
ITEM B. ORDINANCE NO. (O)21-01, REZONING TO CHANGE THE ZONING DESIGNATION OF A
VACANT PARCEL FROM C-1 COMMERCIAL TO R-6 MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (2001306)
Oro Valley Planning Manager Bayer Vella provided an overview of Regular Agenda item 1
including items #1A and item #1B.
Paul Oland of Paradigm Land Design along with Applicant James Kai provided an overview of the
proposed 1st Avenue and Tangerine Road General Plan Amendment and Rezoning for 13.44-Acres,
located South of Tangerine Road and Approximately 1/4 mile East of 1st Avenue and included the
following:
Market Summary
Casitas
Previous Downzonings
Potential Employment
Conclusions
General Plan Amendments
Letters of Support
Support
2-3-21 Minutes, Town Council Regular and Study Session 4
The following individuals spoke in support of items #1A and #1B:
Oro Valley resident Michael Garcia
Oro Valley resident Bill Rodman
Oro Valley resident Lisa Hopper
Oro Valley resident Don Cox
Oro Valley resident Andy Thomas
Oro Valley resident Sean Smiley
Oro Valley resident Kit Donley
Oro Valley resident JJ. Johnston
Oro Valley resident Dennis Roberts
University of Arizona Dean of College of Veterinary Medicine Julie Funk
Oro Valley resident Jeff Grobstein
Oro Valley resident Laura Muller Raymundo
Lorena from La Hacienda Mexican Restaurant
President and CEO of the Oro Valley Chamber of Commerce and resident of Oro Valley Dave Perry
Oro Valley resident Joe Hornat
Oro Valley resident Darin Hoffmann
The following individuals spoke in opposition of items #1A and #1B.
Oro Valley resident Rosa Dailey
Oro Valley resident Shirl Lamonna
Oro Valley resident Teresa Marrow
The following individual spoke regarding item #1A and #1B.
Oro Valley resident Rich Molnar
Discussion ensued amongst Council, Mr. Oland, Mr. Kai and staff regarding item #1A and #1B.
Motion by Mayor Joseph C. Winfield, seconded by Councilmember Joyce
Jones-Ivey to adopt Resolution No. (R)21-01, approving the Type 1 General Plan Amendment to
change two Kai-Capri Special Area policies to allow rental casitas and no other residential use
types on the subject parcel located southeast of the 1st Avenue and Tangerine Road intersection,
based on the finding that the request complies with the amendment criteria and the General Plan.
Discussion continued amongst Council, Mr. Oland, Mr. Kai and staff regarding item #1A and #1B.
Motion was withdrawn by Mayor Winfield and Councilmember Jones-Ivey withdrew her second to the
motion.
Motion by Mayor Joseph C. Winfield, seconded by Councilmember Joyce Jones-Ivey to adopt
Resolution No.(R)21-01 to allow R-6 multi-family residential district zoning uses limited to rental casitas.
Vote: 4 - 3 Failed, required 2/3rd majority vote
OPPOSED: Vice-Mayor Melanie Barrett
Councilmember Tim Bohen
Councilmember Josh Nicolson
Item #1B disregarded due to item #1A failing.
Mayor Winfield requested that Study Session item #1 be moved to a future agenda. There were no
objections to this request.
2-3-21 Minutes, Town Council Regular and Study Session 5
FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
No future agenda items were requested.
STUDY SESSION AGENDA
1.PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION REGARDING THE PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER
PLAN UPDATE
This item was moved to a future agenda.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Mayor Joseph C. Winfield, seconded by Councilmember Tim Bohen to adjourn the
meeting at 10:45 p.m.
Vote: 7 - 0 Carried
_______________________________
Michelle Stine, MMC
Deputy Town Clerk
I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the regular and study
session of the Town of Oro Valley Council of Oro Valley, Arizona held on the 3rd day of February 2021. I further
certify that the meeting was duly called and held and that a quorum was present.
___________________________
Michael Standish, CMC
Town Clerk
2-3-21 Minutes, Town Council Regular and Study Session 6
Town Council Regular Session B.
Meeting Date:02/17/2021
Requested by: Chris Cornelison Submitted By:Chris Cornelison, Town Manager's
Office
Department:Town Manager's Office
SUBJECT:
Resolution No. (R)21-07, approving a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for fiscal years 2021/22 and 2022/23
between the Town of Oro Valley and the Public Safety Employee Group
RECOMMENDATION:
Both the Management Negotiating Committee (MNC) and the Public Safety Negotiating Committee (PSNC)
recommend adoption of the proposed MOU for fiscal years 2021/22 and 2022/23.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Presented herein is an MOU between the Town and the Town's Public Safety Employee Group that has been
mutually agreed upon and signed by members of both negotiating groups. The MNC and PSNC were able to meet
virtually and have mutually agreed upon the attached MOU, which discusses the working conditions, wages and
benefits provided by the Town. The process was productive and resulted in the proposed and agreed upon MOU.
Substantive changes from the current MOU include the change from a 1-year term back to a 2-year term, similar to
previous MOUs prior to COVID-19. The MOU also includes verbiage based on the Town Manager and Town
Council's desires to conduct a salary market assessment, with the potential of adjusting salaries for all employees
based on the market, if financially feasible. Step increases have been included in both fiscal years of the MOU, and
the Step Pay Plan (Attachment A of MOU document) includes the 3% pay and range adjustment proposed by the
Town Manager and approved unanimously by Town Council on January 6, 2021.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
In 2004, the Town Council adopted Ordinance No. (O)04-28, which established a "Meet and Confer"
process for public safety employees. This ordinance was modified in November 2005 by Ordinance No.
(O)05-44, which refined and clarified some language in the original ordinance. On March 3, 2014, the
Town Council approved a modification of the ordinance by removing civilian positions from Town Code
Chapter 4, Section 4-1-8 through Ordinance No. (O)14-03.
The MOU and its related attachments were developed by the Public Safety Negotiating Committee
(PSNC) and the Management Negotiating Committee (MNC), with both parties being in agreement as to
the terms and conditions that are contained herein.
The PSNC's representation is determined by eligible employees within the Police Department and
includes police officers with a rank of sergeant and below. The following members of the Police
Department negotiated the MOU on behalf of the Public Safety Employee Group:
Kevin Peterson, Sergeant
Sarah Leiner, Officer
Zach Young, Sergeant
Rick Rendon, Officer
The MNC membership was assigned by the Town Manager and includes the following employees:
Chris Cornelison, Assistant Town Manager
Judy Boros, Human Resources Director
Chris Olson, Police Commander
David Gephart, Chief Financial Officer
The MNC negotiated with concurrence and guidance from the Town Manager, Police Chief, and Legal
Services Director.
Compared to the current MOU (FY 2020/21), the following substantive changes were agreed upon in the proposed MOU for fiscal years 2021/22
and 2022/23:
It was agreed that this MOU will revert to a 2-year term instead of a 1-year term, as the 1-year term was decided based upon entering
the COVID-19 Pandemic.1.
Step increases are included in the MOU as part of sections 1.18 and 1.19, consistent with past MOUs prior to COVID-19.2.The Step Pay Plan was updated per Town Council's January 6, 2021, approval to provide a 3% adjustment to salaries
and ranges for all Town employees, including officers.3.
The MOU, Section 1.20, includes verbiage based on the Town Manager and Town Council's desire to
conduct a salary market assessment, with the potential of adjusting salaries for all employees based on the
market, if financially feasible.
4.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The fiscal impact of step increases for FY 2021/22 is $135,348 and FY 2022/23 is $122,960. Step and merit
increases would need to be adopted through the budget.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to APPROVE Resolution No. (R)21-07, adopting a Memorandum of Understanding between the Town of
Oro Valley and the Public Safety Employee Group for fiscal years 2021/22 and 2022/23.
Attachments
(R)21-07 MOU Public Safety
MOU 2-Year Agreement
RESOLUTION NO. (R)21-07
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
ORO VALLEY, AR IZONA, APPROVIN G A M EM ORANDUM OF
UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN PUBLIC SAFETY EM PLOYEES AN D
THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 4, SECTION
4-1-8 OF THE TOWN COD E, PUBLIC SAFETY EM PLOYEE RELATIONS
AND PROCESSES FOR FISCAL YEARS 2021/2 2 & 2022/23; AND
DIRECTING THE TOWN MANAGER, TOWN CLERK, TOWN LEGAL
SERVICES DIRECTOR, OR THEIR DULY AUTHORIZED OFFICERS
AND AGENTS TO TAKE ALL STEPS NECESSARY TO CARRY OUT
THE PURPOSES AND INTENT OF THIS RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the Town of Oro Valley is committed to the development and continuation of
harmonio us and cooperative relations hips with all of its employees; and
WHEREAS, the Town recognizes the right of public safety employees to join employee
associations which comply with the laws of Arizona and to present proposals and testimony to
the Town Council, and not to be discharged, disciplined or discriminated against because of the
exercise of those rights; and
WHEREAS, the continued smooth operation of the Police Department is of great benefit to the
residents of Oro Valley and the general public; and
WHEREAS, in 2004 the Town Council adopted Ordinance No. (O) 04-28 which enacted Town
Code Chapter 4, Section 4-1-8, Public Safety Employee Relations and Processes, establishing a
meet and confer process for public safety employees and the Town, and on March 3, 2014, the
Town Council approved the removal of civilian positions from Town Code Chapter 4, Section 4 -
1-8 through Ordinance No. (O) 14-03; and
WHEREAS, the Memorandum of Understanding, attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and
incorporated herein by this reference, was negotiated between the Public Safety Negotiation
Committee and the Town’s Management Negotiation Committee in accordance with C hapter 4,
Section 4-1-8, Public Safety Employee Relatio ns and Processes.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro
Valley, Arizona, that
SECTION 1. the Memorandum of Understanding attached hereto as Exhibit “A”, between the
Town of Oro Valley and Public Safety Employees is hereby approved.
SECTION 2. the Agreement, attached as Exhibit “A”, shall be effective for the period of July 1,
2021 through June 30, 2023.
SECTION 3. The Town Manager, Town Clerk, Town Legal Services Director, or their duly
authorized officers and agents are hereby authorized and directed to take all steps necessary to
carry out the purposes and intent of this resolutio n.
SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this
Resolution is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of
competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions
thereof.
SECTION 5. All Oro Valley Resolutions, or Motions and parts of Resolutions or Motions of the
Council in conflict with the provisions of this Resolution are hereby repealed.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley,
Arizona this 17 th day of February, 2021.
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
Joseph C. Winfie ld, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Michael Standish, Town Clerk Tobin Sidles, Legal Services Director
Date: Date:
EXHIBIT “A”
Town Council Regular Session C.
Meeting Date:02/17/2021
Submitted By:Mike Standish, Town Clerk's Office
Department:Town Clerk's Office
SUBJECT:
Resolution No. (R)21-08, approving the Agenda Committee assignment for the period of March 1, 2021, to May 31,
2021
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Per the Town Council Parliamentary Rules and Procedures & Code of Conduct, the Town Council shall set and
approve the Agenda Committee meeting assignments. Attached is the proposed Agenda Committee meeting
assignment of Vice Mayor Barrett for the period of March 1, 2021, to May 31, 2021.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to (APPROVE or DENY) Resolution No. (R)21-08, approving the Agenda Committee assignment for the
period of March 1, 2021, to May 31, 2021.
Attachments
(R)21-08 Agenda Committee Assignment
RESOLUTION NO. (R)21-08
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY,
ARIZONA, ASSIGNING VICE MAYOR BARRETT TO THE AGENDA COMMITTEE
FOR THE PERIOD OF MARCH 1, 2021 THROUGH MAY 31, 2021; AND DIRECTING
THE TOWN MANAGER, TOWN CLERK, TOWN LEGAL SERVICES DIRECTOR, OR
THEIR DULY AUTHORIZED OFFICERS AND AGENTS TO TAKE ALL STEPS
NECESSARY TO CARRY OUT THE PURPOSES AND INTENT OF THIS RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, on September 19, 2001, the Mayor and Council adopted the Town Council
Parliamentary Rules and Procedures and Code of Conduct; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to section 5.2 (A) Town Council Parliamentary Rules and Procedures &
Code of Conduct , the Town Council shall set and approve the agenda committee meeting
assignments; and
WHEREAS, Town Council wishes to assign Vice Mayor Barrett to the agenda committee for
the period of March 1, 2021 through May 31, 2021.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro
Valley, Arizona, as follows:
SECTION 1. That Vice Mayor Barrett is hereby assigned to the Agenda Committee for the
period of March 1, 2021 through May 31, 2021.
SECTION 2. That the Town Manager, Town Clerk, Town Legal Services Director, or their duly
authorized officers and agents to take all steps necessary to carry out the purposes
and intent of this resolution.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the To wn of Oro Valley,
Arizona, this 17th day of February 2021.
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
___________________________
Joseph C. Winfield, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM :
____________________________ __________________________________
Michael Standish, Town Clerk Tobin Sidles, Legal Services Director
Date: _______________________ Date: _____________________________
Town Council Regular Session 1.
Meeting Date:02/17/2021
Requested by: Mary Jacobs Submitted By:Mary Jacobs, Town Manager's Office
Department:Town Manager's Office
SUBJECT:
PRESENTATION, DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING THE PUSCH 9 GOLF COURSE
RECOMMENDATION:
N/A
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
In February 2020, the Town Council voted to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with HSL El
Conquistador Golf, LLC, HSL El Conquistador, LLC and HSL Financial Management, LLC (cumulatively referred to
as HSL) to exercise their option under the original April 2015 Purchase and Sales Agreement to lease the Pusch
golf course effective October 1, 2020. The MOU further declared the Town’s intention to discontinue operations of
the nine-hole course.
Due to the significant impact of the pandemic on the El Conquistador Resort, HSL notified the Town in late summer
that it would be unable to take on the financial responsibility of the golf course. On November 18, 2020, the Town
Council voted to “request the Town Manager and the Town Attorney to initiate discussions with HSL and the HOAs
that surround the Pusch Ridge Golf Course in an effort to negotiate an acceptable plan for the maintenance and
use of that course subject to Council approval.”
HSL Representative Omar Mireles and five members of the three surrounding HOA’s participated in multiple
discussions regarding potential solutions and options. The HOA representatives stated their willingness to
financially contribute toward the continued operation of the golf course. Staff has reviewed and analyzed the two
most feasible options for the Pusch course: continue golf on the property, or permanently convert it back to natural,
desert open space for passive recreation use. Those options are outlined in more detail in the attached
memorandum, including five-year projected proformas for each.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
See attached memorandum for detailed analysis.
FISCAL IMPACT:
See attached memorandum for detailed financial analysis.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE that the Town Council direct staff to proceed with the ________________________ option for the Pusch 9
golf course property.
Attachments
Town Manager's Pusch Course Options Memorandum
Presentation
DATE: February 8, 2021
MEMO TO: Mayor Winfield and Members of the Town Council
FROM: Mary Jacobs, Town Manager
SUBJECT: Pusch 9 Golf Course Options
BACKGROUND
In February 2020, the Town Council voted to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding
(MOU) with HSL El Conquistador Golf, LLC, HSL El Conquistador, LLC and HSL Financial
Management, LLC (cumulatively referred to as HSL) to exercise their option under the original
April 2015 Purchase and Sales Agreement to lease the Pusch golf course effective October 1,
2020. The MOU further declared the Town’s intention to discontinue operations of the nine-hole
course. Based on this agreement, the Town did not budget or plan to operate the Pusch course
for the 2020/21 golf season.
Due to the significant impact of the pandemic on the El Conquistador Resort, HSL notified the
Town in late summer that it would be unable to take on the financial responsibility of the golf
course, and after some discussion, requested an extension of the MOU until January 31, 2021
in order to explore other options with the adjacent HOAs that could potentially still enable the
lease to be consummated. Subsequently, on November 18, 2020, the Town Council voted to
“request the Town Manager and the Town Attorney to initiate discussions with HSL and the
HOAs that surround the Pusch Ridge Golf Course in an effort to negotiate an acceptable plan
for the maintenance and use of that course subject to Council approval.”
HSL Representative Omar Mireles and five members of the three surrounding HOA’s
participated in multiple discussions regarding potential solutions and options. The HOA
representatives stated their willingness to financially contribute toward the continued operation
of the golf course, which is included in the financial proforma for this option later in this
memorandum. They further stated their unwillingness to partner with HSL on any option, or to
financially contribute to an alternative option to golf.
In January, Mr. Mireles verbally informed the Town and HOA representatives of his
determination that HSL would not exercise their lease option under the MOU. He followed up
with a written notification to the Town on January 30, 2021.
Memorandum to Council on Pusch Golf Course Options
February 8, 2021
P a g e | 2
COMPARISON OF TWO MOST VIABLE OPTIONS
After a thorough analysis, the two most feasible options for the Pusch course are to continue
golf on the property, or to permanently convert it back to natural open space for passive
recreation use. The Purchase and Sales Agreement limits the Town’s consideration of other
uses beyond golf, open space and recreation without amending the agreement. Town staff and
representatives of Indigo Golf Partners have prepared financial proformas for both viable
options, which are detailed below. Staff also engaged the assistance of contractor Kimley Horn
to assess the property and develop likely investment and ongoing maintenance costs for the
open space/recreation option, which have been incorporated in that proforma.
OPTION A: Town continues to operate golf on the 9-hole Pusch course
A challenging yet scenic golf course with dramatic elevation changes, Indigo Golf has assessed
the condition of the existing infrastructure, opportunities and limitations, reviewed the costs and
revenue opportunities, and worked with Town staff to develop a realistic proforma to operate the
Pusch course during the peak season beginning next fall. The proforma is based on the
following assumptions:
• The course would be open from approximately November 1 through May 1 seven days a
week except holidays (increased from six days) from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
• Year 1 assumes an investment of $80,000 in capital to repair the cart path, replace
deteriorated pumps and perform some minor irrigation repairs. Without the investment,
it is anticipated that operating costs would increase approximately $37,000 per year until
the irrigation system is replaced. Year 3 also includes resurfacing of the cart path.
• Revenues are based on $25 greens fee per round and group outings at $20 per round
with revenues projected to increase 2% in year two and 3% thereafter reflecting
utilization and opportunities to modify the pricing structure.
• Revenues are based on 35 rounds per day average, about 50% more play from prior
years, with 2% increases per year. More substantive increased capacity was not
projected as the cart storage/charging area would need to be expanded. The building
can only accommodate 20 carts, including charging stations. Very preliminary estimates
for such a capital project are $350,000 - $400,000 but staff would need to get an
architect and contractor to firm up estimates. This investment has not been included in
the proforma.
• The HOA’s offer to pay $34,050 per year for at least five years is included in the
proforma. No potential revenue from HSL is included as they were unable to firmly
commit at this time due to an unknown economic recovery period for the hotel.
• Golf check-in would need to continue to be conducted from the small counter space
shared with tennis check-in until such time as the downstairs pro shop is updated and
made ADA accessible (interior, bathrooms, etc.), limiting the ability to grow in additional
rounds as well as food/beverage and merchandise revenue. This set-up is also
challenging for the tennis operator. Those estimated $500,000 in facility improvements
are programmed into year 5 of the proforma to match revenue availability within the
Community Center Fund.
• Assumes no additional changes in minimum wage.
Memorandum to Council on Pusch Golf Course Options
February 8, 2021
P a g e | 3
The Pusch Ridge golf course is the only golf course on Town-supplied potable water. In the
preparation of this proforma, the Water Utility identified an anomaly related to the rate charged
to the Pusch course for its water. Director Peter Abraham discovered during his analysis of
water use and projected revenues that for an unknown reason, the Pusch course water account
never transitioned to the tiered conservation pricing structure adopted by the Town Council in
1999/2000 and later updated in 2007/08. For the past 20 years, the course has continually been
charged a fixed Tier 1 rate rather than the established commodity rate structure. There is no
documentation in the file regarding this matter, and no current staff were employed by the Water
Utility during that time to further explain this discrepancy. The Council has the option of
including a new Tier (Turf) in the upcoming rate structure discussion and formally set the
potable turf commodity rate at the Tier 1 rate. If the correct rate structure is alternately applied, it
is estimated that the cost for water on the 9-hole course would increase by approximately
$70,000 per year. The proforma does not reflect that additional cost.
PUSCH GOLF 5-YEAR SUMMARY PROFORMA
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
FY 21/22
Forecasted
FY 22/23
Forecasted
FY 23/24
Forecasted
FY 24/25
Forecasted
FY 25/26
Forecasted
Revenues:
Greens & Cart Fees 164,475 169,409 172,797 176,253 179,778
Pro Shop Sales 3,600 3,672 3,745 3,820 3,897
Other Golf Revenues 5,275 5,381 5,488 5,598 5,710
HOA Contribution 34,050 34,050 34,050 34,050 34,050
Subtotal $207,400 $212,512 $216,081 $219,722 $223,435
Expenditures:
Personnel & Labor 86,913 87,800 88,697 89,604 90,521
Golf Course Maintenance 196,426 198,390 200,374 202,378 204,402
Other Golf Expenditures 41,424 41,544 41,787 42,033 42,282
Facility Improvements 95,000 - 75,000 1,200,000 652,460
Subtotal $419,763 $327,734 $405,858 $1,534,015 $989,664
Expenditures: 419,763 327,734 405,858 1,534,015
Net Pusch Impact: ($212,363) ($115,223) ($189,777) ($1,314,293) ($766,229)
Cumulative Impact: ($212,363) ($327,586) ($517,363) ($1,831,656) ($2,597,885)
Est. General Fund Tax
Collections from Pusch Golf
Operations
419,763 327,734 405,858 1,534,015 989,664
$9,254 $9,413 $9,542 $9,673 $9,806
Memorandum to Council on Pusch Golf Course Options
February 8, 2021
P a g e | 4
The following is a list of the major pros and cons for this option. This list is not exhaustive.
PROS
• The Town would continue to operate 45 holes of golf, with a 9-hole course available
in its offerings for those seeking a shorter play option. With few 9-hole courses in the
region, this could provide an opportunity to capitalize on the growing number of
golfers in the region/nation due to the impacts of the pandemic.
• The course provides an attractive backdrop to the El Conquistador Resort as well as
the adjacent residences and helps to protect property values.
• This option would provide an immediately adjacent golf course to the El
Conquistador Resort with which to attract leisure hotel guests and groups and could
be used to help market the resort.
• The HOAs have committed to financially participate in the operating costs of the
course for at least five years and have further expressed support in encouraging their
residents to become members or otherwise regularly use the amenity.
• The HOAs have also committed to facilitating among their individual homeowners
additional contributions toward investments/modifications to reduce turf and improve
water usage, such as installing more water efficient native plants in a campaign to
“adopt and fund” such improvements.
CONS
• Pusch is the only course on Town-supplied potable water, using an average of 38M-
45M gallons annually. Reclaimed water infrastructure cannot be affordably installed
to mitigate use in the future.
• The Pusch course irrigation system is nearing the end of its useful life and will need
to be replaced in the foreseeable future, estimated at $1.2M. This cost is included in
Year 4 of the proforma.
• With limited space for check-in until the former downstairs pro shop is refurbished
(preliminary cost estimate of approximately $500,000), and with space to store and
charge only 20 carts daily, capacity is limited to meaningfully expand the number of
rounds played without a significant additional capital investment (preliminary cost
estimate of approximately $350,000 - $400,000).
• If future HOA boards determine their continued contribution to the operation of the
course is not financially feasible or desirable, it could result in the review of the same
options for the property, potentially after investing in the irrigation infrastructure.
• Similarly, the resort/HSL is unable to make a firm financial commitment toward
supporting golf operations at this time. (Mr. Mireles expressed a willingness to
consider up to $40,000 per year once the resort is financially able to support the
contribution.)
• The proforma projects approximately 6700 – 7200 rounds played on the course
annually. The Town could be criticized for making the needed capital investments in
this amenity versus the Community Center, which receives over 8,000 users per
month (pre-COVID), on average.
• The ongoing subsidy and needed capital investments for the Pusch course would
impact the resources available for capital investments in the Community Center
based on the Town Council’s current pay-as-you-go policy.
Memorandum to Council on Pusch Golf Course Options
February 8, 2021
P a g e | 5
OPTION B: Convert the 9-hole course to natural open space/passive recreation as a
community amenity
The 9-hole course is located within a scenic area at the base of Pusch Ridge. The report from
Kimley Horn identified a range of investment options to convert the property to natural open
space/passive recreation, which are summarized in the table on the following page. The final
report will be sent to Town Council as a follow-up. The financial summary/pro forma is based
on the following major assumptions:
• The Kimley Horn analysis is not intended to serve as a final design or firm cost
estimate, but rather provide a framework with which to evaluate this option and
potentially budget for improvements.
• A final plan would be developed by a qualified landscape architect (following a
competitive solicitation), incorporating input/engagement of area residents and
representatives of the resort/HSL to design an acceptable plan.
• Three (3) different levels of improvements/restoration are provided and can be adjusted
to varying degrees of in between.
• Fairways and greens would be repurposed with appropriate natural, low maintenance
and sustainable landscaping that would support an attractive, walkable/bikeable space.
• Cost estimates are based on the native seed mix being applied during a normal rain
season rather than irrigated to minimize invasive species such as buffelgrass, which
would increase maintenance costs in the future and potentially impact other areas.
• Much of the existing 8’ asphalt pathway is cracking, uneven or in need of replacement.
It is estimated that approximately 70% of the pathways should be replaced if the site is
to be used by the public in the future.
• Parking is currently limited, so would likely need to be expanded if the trail system
became a community amenity.
Memorandum to Council on Pusch Golf Course Options
February 8, 2021
P a g e | 6
CONVERT GOLF COURSE TO NATURAL OPEN SPACE 5-YEAR SUMMARY
Revenues and Operating Expenses based on Level 2. Other levels would be slightly less or more.
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
FY 21/22
Forecasted
FY 22/23
Forecasted
FY 23/24
Forecasted
FY 24/25
Forecasted
FY 25/26
Forecasted
Revenues: - - - - -
Expenditures:
Maintenance* - 70,000 35,000 30,000 30,000
Utilities 1,550 1,600 1,650 1,700
Operating Capital - 7,500 6,000 5,000 5,000
Capital Investment
Level 1 1,355,505
Level 2 1,760,075
Level 3 2,675,245
Total Net Impact Level 1: ($1,355,505) ($79,050) ($42,600) ($36,650) ($36,700)
Total Net Impact Level 2: ($1,760,075) ($79,050) ($42,600) ($36,650) ($36,700)
Total Net Impact Level 3: ($2,675,245) ($79,050) ($42,600) ($36,650) ($36,700)
Cumulative Impact Level 1: ($1,355,505) ($1,434,555) ($1,477,155) ($1,513,805) ($1,550,505)
Cumulative Impact Level 2: ($1,760,075) ($1,839,125) ($1,881,725) ($1,918,375) ($1,955,075)
Cumulative Impact Level 3: ($2,675,245) ($2,754,295) ($2,796,895) ($2,833,545) ($2,870,245)
*Maintenance costs include landscape trimming, invasive species removal, raking, etc.
Contractor is assumed to have control of site, including maintenance in Year 1. Year 2 cost
includes limited truck watering of seeded area, if needed.
Memorandum to Council on Pusch Golf Course Options
February 8, 2021
P a g e | 7
Kimley Horn Conceptual Opinion of Probably Cost for Conversion of Golf Course to
Natural Open Space and Passive Recreation.
(Note: 15% Contingency not included in this table but reflected in proforma on previous page.)
The following is a list of the major pros and cons for this option. This list is not exhaustive.
PROS
• The converted course could be a unique trail/pathway addition to the Town’s inventory of
paved paths in an area previously inaccessible to the rest of the community. The
community has identified outdoor paths as one of its top priorities in the recent Parks
and Recreation master plan process, and there is a natural area away from residents to
easily accommodate a parking trailhead.
Memorandum to Council on Pusch Golf Course Options
February 8, 2021
P a g e | 8
• Revegetation of the fairways and greens to a natural desert environment would
significantly lower potable water use on the property from the 38M-45M gallons used
annually for golf. After three to five years when the vegetation becomes mature, much
of the water use would be eliminated altogether.
• The El Conquistador resort could tout the proximity of a paved walking/biking path
adjacent to their property as an amenity usable to more of their guests, tapping into the
increasing number of leisure travelers seeking outdoor experiences due to the
pandemic.
• The Town could work with the El Conquistador to provide an opportunity for part of the
space near the resort to be planned for outdoor events, a desirable amenity in this
pandemic environment, in consideration of appropriate financial support.
• This option would provide a permanent solution to the considerable uncertainty the
surrounding residents have experienced over the past few years, stabilizing property
values.
• The revegetation would create approximately 30 acres of natural desert habitat for
wildlife.
• Annual maintenance costs are lower than the projected subsidy for the golf option.
CONS
• Once converted, the option for operating 9 holes of golf on the property is likely
permanently closed.
• The adjacent 227 homes and the Resort lose the green golf amenity next to their
properties and may see at least short-term impacts on property valuation until the
amenity vegetation is mature.
• The conversion process will take some time, potentially 3-5 years for the vegetation to
look its attractive best. Some non-native large trees in poor health will likely need to be
removed but would be replaced with a larger quantity of trees that are more natural and
self-sustaining in the desert climate.
• There are already public trails on the Town’s east side in Catalina State Park and via the
Linda Vista Loop, so this area may not be sought out by residents/visitors.
• The walking/biking amenity could attract more residents and visitors to the property
annually than the estimated golf users, increasing the number of people using the paths
for outdoor recreation. Care would need to be given to addressing resident and hotel
guest safety issues. Conversely, the property may not receive as many users as other
parks/open spaces, which may not justify the investment and conversion.
Memorandum to Council on Pusch Golf Course Options
February 8, 2021
P a g e | 9
COMMUNITY CENTER FUND IMPACT
Staff has updated the five-year Community Center Fund forecast with current information and
projections, some of which have changed due to the impacts of the pandemic on both revenues
and expenditures. This proforma will continue to be adjusted over the next two months as new
data is received, and the Town Council will have an opportunity to review the updated projection
at a study session planned in April. The proforma reflects all operations in the Community
Center Fund, and the net impact of the Pusch operation is toward the bottom of the table.
COMMUNITY CENTER FUND 5-YEAR SUMMARY
(36 holes + all other non-golf uses)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
FY 21/22
Forecasted
FY 22/23
Forecasted
FY 23/24
Forecasted
FY 24/25
Forecasted
FY 25/26
Forecasted
Est. Beginning Fund
Balance $879,785 $404,624 $152,387 $1,296,341 ($128,197)
Revenues:
Golf Operator 3,603,442 3,705,229 3,809,997 3,917,832 4,138,618
Town Operations 975,102 984,658 994,310 1,004,058 1,013,903
Sales Taxes 2,709,285 2,763,471 2,813,213 2,863,851 2,915,400
Other 2,500 3,000 4,000 5,000 5,000
HOA Contribution 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000
Subtotal $7,415,329 $7,581,358 $7,746,520 $7,915,740 $8,197,921
Expenditures:
Golf Operator 4,490,858 4,520,584 4,567,557 4,642,313 4,921,091
Town Operations 978,750 1,010,273 1,042,828 1,076,449 1,111,173
Capital 1,920,000 1,895,000 510,000 2,015,000 120,000
Debt Service 168,519 172,516 172,403 172,224 172,968
Transfers (in)/out 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 -
Subtotal $7,678,127 $7,718,372 $6,412,788 $8,025,986 $6,325,232
Expenditures: 7,678,127 7,718,372 6,412,788 8,025,986
Net Pusch impact ($212,363) ($115,223) ($189,777) ($1,314,293) ($766,229)
Est. Change in Fund
Balance ($475,161) ($252,237) $1,143,955 ($1,424,539) $1,106,460
Est. Ending Fund Balance $404,624 $152,387 $1,296,341 ($128,197) $978,263
Est. General Fund Tax
Collections from Golf
Operations
7,890,490 7,833,595 6,602,565 9,340,279 7,091,461
$83,076 $84,685 $86,312 $89,095 $91,985
Memorandum to Council on Pusch Golf Course Options
February 8, 2021
P a g e | 10
IMPLEMENTATION OF FINAL OPTION
The Town, through its golf operator, Indigo Golf Partners, took on interim maintenance of the
Pusch course property with the understanding that a final decision on its long-term use was
dependent first on whether the property would be leased to HSL, and second, whether the
property would continue as golf or be converted. The Town recognizes that the Purchase and
Sales Agreement includes a provision that requires the Town to maintain the property in a
manner “compatible with the operation of the Resort as a first-class resort property.” Since the
Town finds itself in an unplanned situation, HSL has verbally agreed not to seek enforcement of
that provision until such time as a decision on the final outcome of this property is determined
and the Town is given the opportunity to budget for and complete its implementation. In the
meantime, additional maintenance support is in the process of getting finalized through an
external contract with the Town’s outside landscaping firm.
Town staff have begun the development of the FY21/22 budget, and the Recommended Budget
is scheduled to be distributed to the Town Council by mid-April. Whatever final decision is
made, staff will incorporate the appropriate expenditures and revenues into the budget for
Council approval. If the Council chooses the open space option rather than golf, I will take
steps to immediately solicit the services of a landscape architect so the design process can
begin as soon as possible.
This item is scheduled for discussion and possible action at your February 17 regular Council
meeting. I and several members of my team, including Indigo Golf Partners, are also scheduled
to meet with representatives of the HOAs late this week to review the content of this report and
answer any questions.
Feel free to contact me with any questions in the interim.
Copy: Gary Cohen, Town Attorney
Chris Cornelison, Assistant Town Manager
Kristy Diaz-Trahan, Parks and Recreation Director
David Gephart, Chief Financial Officer
Bernie Eaton, El Con Golf General Manager, Indigo Golf Partners
Tony Marino, Regional Director of Operations, Indigo Golf Partners
Omar Mireles, President, HSL Properties
Anna Bifano, President of El Con Patio HOA
Sandy Carter, President of Shadows of the Ridge HOA #2
Niranjan Vescio, Secretary/Treasurer of Shadows of the Ridge HOA #2
Tony D’Angelo, HOA Representative, El Con Patio HOA
Paul Sedon, President of Shadows of the Ridge HOA #1
Pusch Ridge Golf Course Options
February 17, 2021
Background
February 2020 –Town Council voted to enter into a Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) with HSL
HSL agreed to exercise their option to lease Pusch Golf Course, effective
October 1, 2020
Later extended to January 31, 2021, due to impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic
The MOU declared the Town’s intention to discontinue operations of the nine-
hole course
Based on this agreement, the Town did not budget or plan to operate the Pusch
course for the 2020/21 golf season
Pusch 9 Golf Course Main Options
Option A –Town continues to operate the golf on the 9-hole Pusch course
A.1 –Town could also pursue a Request for Proposals for 3rd party to lease (4-5 month process)
A.2 –Town could leave as park-like (green grass), although higher costs w/ little public use
Option B –Convert the 9-hole course to a natural open space/passive recreation as
a community amenity
•Note –The Purchase and Sales Agreement limits the Town’s consideration of other uses beyond golf, open space and
recreation without amending the agreement
Pusch Golf 5-Year Summary Proforma
Proforma Assumptions:
Option A –Continued Golf Operations (Cont.)
Golf Operations –November 1 through May 1
Seven days per week, excluding holidays
Year One -$95,000 Capital for Repairs
Year three -resurfacing of the cart path
Increased operating cost of $37,000 per year until the irrigation system is replaced (Year four)
Revenues
Based on $25 greens fee per round; groups $20 per round
Projected to increase 2% in year two and 3% thereafter
Based on average of 35 rounds per day, with 2% increases per year
Limited capacity due to facility and cart quantity limitations
Proforma Assumptions:
Option A –Continued Golf Operations (Cont.)
HOA Contributions -$34,050 per year for five years
Golf Check-In
Utilizing shared counter space with tennis check-in until Pro Shop is updated and made ADA accessible
Limited growth availability in additional rounds, food/beverage, and merchandise revenue
Approx. $500,000 CIP (Year five) –Dependent on revenue availability in the Community Center Fund
No changes in minimum wage
PROS (not exhaustive list)
Option A –Continued Golf Operations (Cont.)
Capitalize on golfers looking for shorter play and growing numbers due to
pandemic impacts
Attractive backdrop for the El Conquistador Resort
Resident property values protected
Marketing opportunity for the El Conquistador Resort –attracting leisure guests
and groups
HOA contributions and potential residential members or frequent golfers
HOA commitment to additional contributions toward investments/
modifications to reduce turf and improve water usage
CONS (not exhaustive list)
Option A –Continued Golf Operations (Cont.)
Only course on Town-supplied potable water, using an average of 38M –45M
gallons annually
Reclaimed water infrastructure cannot be affordably installed
Irrigation system will need replacing –estimated at $1.2M
Limited capacity until pro shop is refurbished and cart storage space expanded
Preliminary cost estimate of $350,000 -$400,000 for cart storage expansion
Future HOA contributions unknown
El Conquistador Resort/HSL contributions unknown
Utilizing capital on 9-hole course improvements versus Community Center
Approx. 6,700 –7,200 rounds annually for Pusch Golf vs. 8,000 monthly visitors (pre-COVID) at
Community Center
Conversion to Natural Desert Open Space 5-Year Summary Proforma
Proforma Assumptions:
Option B –Convert Course to Natural Desert Open Space (Cont.)
Preliminary estimate (Kimley-Horn) used as a framework for general costs and
concepts
Final plan developed by qualified landscape architect (following competitive RFP solicitation), with
input/engagement from area residents, El Conquistador/HSL and public
The three levels of improvement/restoration can be adjusted to varying degrees
Fairways and greens repurposed with low maintenance, sustainable, desert
landscaping
Cost estimates based on native seed mix application during normal rain season
Estimated that approximately 70% of pathways should be replaced if used by
the public in the future
Expansion of parking if trail system becomes community amenity
Kimley Horn Conceptual Opinions
(Note: 15% Contingency not included in this table but reflected in the proforma)
Option B –Convert Course to Natural Desert Open Space (Cont.)
PROS (not exhaustive list)
Option B –Convert Course to Natural Desert Open Space (Cont.)
Unique trail/pathway addition to Town’s inventory of paved paths
Outdoor paths identified by community as a top priority in recent Parks and Recreation master plan process
Revegetation of the fairways and greens to natural desert environment will
significantly reduce potable water use
Most water use will be eliminated after vegetation matures (3-5 years)
Marketing opportunity for El Conquistador Resort to increase leisure travelers wanting
outdoor experiences (paved walking and bike paths)
Potential for planned outdoor event space near El Conquistador Resort
Stabilize property values for surrounding residents
Revegetation will create approximately 30 acres of natural desert habitat for wildlife
Annual maintenance costs lower than projected subsidy for golf option
CONS (not exhaustive list)
Option B –Convert Course to Natural Desert Open Space (Cont.)
Once converted, option for 9-hole golf will likely be closed permanently
Short-term impacts on property valuations for adjacent homes while amenity
vegetation matures
Conversion will potentially take 3-5 years for vegetation to mature and reach its
visual potential
Trails may not be sought by residents/visitors due to proximity of Catalina State
Park and Linda Vista Loop
Resort and resident safety concerns with increased amenity use
Conversely, limited use may not justify the investment and conversion
Community Center Fund 5-Year Summary Proforma
Community Center Fund Impact
Pusch Course Options Summary
Option A –Town continues to operate golf on the 9-hole Pusch Course
A.1 –Town could also pursue a Request for Proposals for 3rd party to lease (4-5 month process)
A.2 –Town could leave as park-like (green grass), although higher costs w/ little public use
Option B –Convert the 9-hole course to a natural open space/passive
recreation as a community amenity