Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPackets - Council Packets (1528) **AMENDED (4-6-99, 4:45 PM) AGENDA ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION APRIL 7, 1999 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11,000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL EXECUTIVE SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM An Executive Session pursuant to ARS 38-431.03(A)(3) & (4) to obtain legal advice and to consult with the Town Attorneys concerning the following items: 1. Tucson Water Service Area within the Town of Oro Valley corporate limits. 2. Review of 9th Court Circuit of Appeals decision relating to Charles A. Lathrem and Wayne Bryant vs. Town of Oro Valley 3. (a) The outcome and effect of the decisions of the Arizona Court of Appeals and the Arizona Supreme Court in the case Schmitz v. Cuvelier, Pima County Superior Court No. 328724, Court of Appeals No. 2 CA-CV 98-0223, Supreme Court No. CV-99-0031-PR, (b) the canvass of the FOP Initiative election which was the subject of the Schmitz v. Cuvelier case, and (c) the proposed ordinance which was the subject of the FOP Initiative. **4. The Town's position in response to the motion of Plaintiff/Appellant Wayne Bryant to withdraw and be dismissed as a party in the case Town of Tortolita et al. V. Town of Oro Valley, Arizona Court of Appeals No. 1 CA-CV 99-0022, Pima County Superior Court No. C-328365. RESUME REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 7:00 PM **TAKE LEGAL ACTION AS THE TOWN COUNCIL DEEMS NECESSARY CONCERNING THE EXECUTIVE SESSION ITEMS LISTED ABOVE CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS —TOWN MANAGER The Mayor and Council may consider and/or take action on the items listed below: 04/07/99 Agenda, Council Regular Session 2 ORDER OF BUSINESS: MAYOR WILL REVIEW THE ORDER OF THE MEETING CALL TO AUDIENCE —According to the Arizona Open Meeting Law, the Town Council may only discuss matters listed on the Town Council Agenda. Matters brought up by the public under "Call to Audience"cannot be discussed by the Town Council as they have not been placed on the agenda. Any items must be addressed to the whole Council, not a specific member. In order to speak during "Call to Audience", please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. 1. CONSENT AGENDA (Consideration and/or possible action) A. Minutes — 3-15-99, 3-17-99 & 3-24-99 B. Police Report— February 1999 C. Resolution No. (R)99-37 Authorizing the Town to contract with Agra Infrastructure, Inc. to prepare plans and specifications for the installation of three traffic signals within the town limits D. Proclamation - Designating the week of May 1 — May 8, 1999 as National Safe Kids Week E. Resolution No. (R)99-38 Authorizing the Oro Valley Police Department to apply to the Governor's Office of Community and Highway Safety for funds to purchase a DUI Enforcement Vehicle and an Aggressive Drive Enforcement Vehicle to further public safety within the boundaries of the Town of Oro Valley F. Resolution No. (R)99-39 Designating Officers to declare Official Intent on Behalf of the Town with respect to reimbursement from proceeds of tax-exempt bonds pursuant to Treasury Regulations Section 1.150.2 G. Resolution No. (R)99-40 Award of Contract for Project No. 318- 310-903.319 to construct a left turn bay at the intersection of Tangerine Road and La Canada Drive to NAC Construction H. OV13-97-68 Approval of Sunset Ridge at Rancho Vistoso II (aka Maravilla) Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 10, Parcel M, Entry Monument (Property located west of Rancho Vistoso Blvd. and north of Moore Road) I. OV12-95-02 Approval of amended assurance agreement between DMI Tangerine, LLC and First American Title Insurance as Trustee of OV12-95-02 — Coyote Ridge, Lots 1-109 J. Project No. W07-0798 — Notice of Completion for Town of Oro Valley Water Utility Water Main Extension (2700 zone) K. OV12-98-20 St. Mary's MPP, Public Art Proposal 2. RESOLUTION NO. (R)99- 41 CANVASS OF THE VOTE - FOP LODGE # 53 INITIATIVE, MARCH 9, 1999 SPECIAL/RECALL ELECTION 04/07/99 Agenda, Council Regular Session 3 3. PUBLIC HEARING — ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-18 AMENDING CHAPTER 11, SECTION 11-3-4 OF THE CODE OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PERTAINING TO SPEED LIMITS - MONTERRA VISTA DRIVE FROM NARANJA DRIVE TO TANGERINE ROAD TO 30 MPH AND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF 4. PUBLIC HEARING — ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-19 AMENDING CHAPTER 11, SECTION 11-3-4 OF THE CODE OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PERTAINING TO SPEED LIMITS — PORTION OF WOODBURNE AVENUE BETWEEN ARROWSMITH DRIVE AND RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD TO 35 MPH AND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF 5. RESOLUTION NO. (R)99-42 APPROVING THE REQUEST FROM GREEN TREE ESTATES HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION FOR THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY TO ACCEPT MAINTENANCE OF STREETLIGHTS ON GREEN TREE DRIVE 6. PUBLIC HEARING — ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-20 TRANSLATING THE ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY SUBURBAN RANCH (SR) TO ORO VALLEY R1-144 FOR THE PROPERTIES KNOWN AS MAP 3 "WESTERN ANNEXATION" (PROPERTIES LOCATED NORTH OF LAMBERT LANE APPROXIMATELY 1/4 MILE SOUTH OF NARANJA DRIVE, EAST OF SHANNON ROAD, AND WEST OF LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD) 7. PUBLIC HEARING — ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-21 OV9-99-28 PARCEL 224-20-002B, CASAS ADOBES BAPTIST CHURCH, TRANSLATING THE ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY SUBURBAN RANCH (SR) TO ORO VALLEY R1-144 WITH CONDITIONS, AND REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH (PROPERTY LOCATED WITH ANNEXATION MAP 3 - WEST AND ADJACENT TO CANADA HILLS B & C) 8. PUBLIC HEARING — ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-22 OV8-99-2 COPPER MOUNTAIN ASSEMBLY OF GOD REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ESTABLISH A COMMUNITY SERVICE AGENCY FOR SPRINGBOARD, A TEMPORARY SHELTER FOR ABUSED, ADOLESCENT WOMEN (PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE COPPER MOUNTAIN ASSEMBLY OF GOD, ON THE NORTH SIDE OF TANGERINE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY V4 MILE WEST OF LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD) 04/07/99 Agenda, Council Regular Session 4 9. RESOLUTION NO. (R)99-43 A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY ENCOURAGING THE INCORPORATION OF THE CASAS ADOBES AREA OF UNINCORPORATED PIMA COUNTY 10. PUBLIC HEARING — ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-23 OV8-99-1 MIRAGE HOMES REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR SHORT- TERM RENTALS IN THE RANCHO VISTOSO PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT— BUILDINGS 1 — 8 AND COMMON ELEMENTS OF VISTOSO GOLF CASITAS II, (PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTH OF VISTOSO HIGHLANDS DRIVE, WEST OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD 11. OV12-98-21 VISTOSO GOLF CASITAS II, FINAL PLAT, RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 11, PARCEL AJ (PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTH OF VISTOSO HIGHLANDS DRIVE AND WEST OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD) 12. OV12-98-21 VISTOSO GOLF CASITAS II, LANDSCAPE PLAN RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 11, PARCEL AJ (PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTH OF VISTOSO HIGHLANDS DRIVE AND WEST OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD) 13. OV12-99-3 RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 10J, THE INN AT VISTOSO DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD AND VISTOSO HIGHLANDS DRIVE) 14. OV12-99-3 RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 10J, THE INN AT VISTOSO LANDSCAPE PLAN (PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD AND VISTOSO HIGHLANDS DRIVE) 15. OV12-98-12 CANADA CROSSROADS DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A PROPOSED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONALLY ZONED C-N (PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LAMBERT LANE AND LA CANADA DRIVE) 16. OV12-98-12 CANADA CROSSROADS LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR A PROPOSED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONALLY ZONED C-N (PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LAMBERT LANE AND LA CANADA DRIVE) 17. OV12-98-18 SIGMA TECHNOLOGIES EXPANSION, DEVELOPMENT PLAN, (PROPERTY LOCATED ON LOT 1 OF THE FOOTHILLS BUSINESS PARK, WEST OF THE ALLIED SIGNAL BUILDING) 04/07/99 Agenda, Council Regular Session 5 18. EXTENDING THE TERMS OF THE FIRE ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBERS TOWN MANAGER'S REPORT ENGINEER'S REPORT FINANCE DIRECTOR'S REPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S REPORT POLICE CHIEF'S REPORT COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS CALL TO AUDIENCE- According to the Arizona Open Meeting Law, the Town Council may only discuss matters listed on the Town Council Agenda. Matters brought up by the public under "Call to Audience"cannot be discussed by the Town Council, as they have not been placed on the agenda. Any items must be addressed to the whole Council, not a specific member. In order to speak during "Call to Audience", please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. ADJOURNMENT .POSTED: 03/31/99 AMENDED AGENDA POSTED: 4:30 P.M. 4/6/99 Ih 4:45 PM RG A packet of agenda materials as listed above is available for public inspection at least 24 hours prior to the Council meeting in the office of the Town Clerk between the hours of 8:30 a.m. - 5:00p.m. The Town of Oro Valley complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If any person with a disability needs any type of accommodation, please notify Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk, at 297-2591. 04/07/99 Agenda, Council Regular Session 6 INSTRUCTIONS TO SPEAKERS Members of the public have the right to speak during any posted public hearing. However, those items not listed as a public hearing are for consideration and action by the Town Council during the course of their business meeting. Members of the public may be allowed to speak on these topics at the discretion of the Chair. If you wish to address the Town Council on any item(s) on this agenda, please complete a speaker card located on the Agenda table at the back of the room and give it to the Town Clerk. Please indicate on the speaker card which item number and topic you wish to speak on, or if you wish to speak during "Call to Audience", please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. Please step forward to the podium when the Mayor announces the item(s) on the agenda which you are interested in addressing. 1. Please state your name and address for the record. 2. Speak only on the issue currently being discussed by Council. Please organize your speech, you will only be allowed to address the Council once regarding the topic being discussed. 3. Please limit your comments to 3 minutes. 4. During "Call to Audience" you may address the Council on any issue you wish. 5. Any member of the public speaking must speak in a courteous and respectful manner to those present. Thank you for your cooperation. AGENDA ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION APRIL 7, 1999 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11,000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL EXECUTIVE SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM An Executive Session pursuant to ARS 38-431.03(A)(3) & (4) to obtain legal advice and to consult with the Town Attorneys concerning the following items: 1. Tucson Water Service Area within the Town of Oro Valley corporate limits. 2. Review of 9th Circuit Court of Appeals decision relating to Charles A. Lathrem and Wayne Bryant vs. Town of Oro Valley 3. (a) The outcome and effect of the decisions of the Arizona Court of Appeals and the Arizona Supreme Court in the case Schmitz v. Cuvelier, Pima County Superior Court No. 328724, Court of Appeals No. 2 CA-CV 98-0223, Supreme Court No. CV-99-0031-PR, (b) the canvass of the FOP Initiative election which was the subject of the Schmitz v. Cuvelier case, and (c) the proposed ordinance which was the subject of the FOP Initiative. RESUME REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS — TOWN MANAGER The Mayor and Council may consider and/or take action on the items listed below: ORDER OF BUSINESS: MAYOR WILL REVIEW THE ORDER OF THE MEETING CALL TO AUDIENCE —According to the Arizona Open Meeting Law, the Town Council may only discuss matters listed on the Town Council Agenda. Matters brought up by the public under "Call to Audience" cannot be discussed by the Town Council as they have not been placed on the agenda. Any items must be addressed to the whole Council, not a specific 04/07/99 Agenda, Council Regular Session 2 member. In order to speak during "Call to Audience", please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. 1. CONSENT AGENDA (Consideration and/or possible action) A. Minutes — 3-15-99, 3-17-99 & 3-24-99 B. Police Report— February 1999 C. Resolution No. (j )99-37 Authorizing the Town to contract with Agra Infrastructure, Inc. to prepare plans and specifications for the installation of three traffic signals within the town limits D. Proclamation - Designating the week of May 1 — May 8, 1999 as National Safe Kids Week E. Resolution No. (R)99-38 Authorizing the Oro Valley Police Department to apply to the Governor's Office of Community and Highway Safety for funds to purchase a DUI Enforcement Vehicle and an Aggressive Drive Enforcement Vehicle to further public safety within the boundaries of the Town of Oro Valley F. Resolution No. (R)99-39 Designating Officers to declare Official Intent on Behalf of the Town with respect to reimbursement from proceeds of tax-exempt bonds pursuant to Treasury Regulations Section 1.150.2 G. Resolution No. (R)99-40 Award of Contract for Project No. 318- 310-903.319 to construct a left turn bay at the intersection of Tangerine Road and La Canada Drive to NAC Construction H. OV13-97-68 Approval of Sunset Ridge at Rancho Vistoso II (aka Maravilla) Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 10, Parcel M, Entry Monument (Property located west of Rancho Vistoso Blvd. and north of Moore Road) I. OV12-95-02 Approval of amended assurance agreement between DMI Tangerine, LLC and First American Title Insurance as Trustee of OV12-95-02 — Coyote Ridge, Lots 1-109 J. Project No. W07-0798 — Notice of Completion for Town of Oro Valley Water Utility Water Main Extension (2700 zone) K. OV12-98-20 St. Mary's MPP, Public Art Proposal 2. RESOLUTION NO. (R)99-41 CANVASS OF THE VOTE - FOP LODGE # 53 INITIATIVE, MARCH 9, 1999 SPECIAL/RECALL ELECTION 3. PUBLIC HEARING — ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-18 AMENDING CHAPTER 11, SECTION 11-3-4 OF THE CODE OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PERTAINING TO SPEED LIMITS - MONTERRA VISTA DRIVE FROM NARANJA DRIVE TO TANGERINE ROAD TO 30 MPH AND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF 04/07/99 Agenda, Council Regular Session 3 4. PUBLIC HEARING — ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-19 AMENDING CHAPTER 11, SECTION 11-3-4 OF THE CODE OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PERTAINING TO SPEED LIMITS — PORTION OF WOODBURNE AVENUE BETWEEN ARROWSMITH DRIVE AND RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD TO 35 MPH AND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF 5. RESOLUTION NO. (R)99-42 APPROVING THE REQUEST FROM GREEN TREE ESTATES HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION FOR THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY TO ACCEPT MAINTENANCE OF STREETLIGHTS ON GREEN TREE DRIVE 6. PUBLIC HEARING — ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-20 TRANSLATING THE ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY SUBURBAN RANCH (SR) TO ORO VALLEY R1-144 FOR THE PROPERTIES KNOWN AS MAP 3 "WESTERN ANNEXATION" (PROPERTIES LOCATED NORTH OF LAMBERT LANE APPROXIMATELY 1/4 MILE SOUTH OF NARANJA DRIVE, EAST OF SHANNON ROAD, AND WEST OF LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD) 7. PUBLIC HEARING — ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-21 OV9-99-28 PARCEL 224-20-002B, CASAS ADOBES BAPTIST CHURCH, TRANSLATING THE ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY SUBURBAN RANCH (SR) TO ORO VALLEY R1-144 WITH CONDITIONS, AND REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH (PROPERTY LOCATED WITH ANNEXATION MAP 3 - WEST AND ADJACENT TO CANADA HILLS B & C) 8. PUBLIC HEARING — ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-22 OV8-99-2 COPPER MOUNTAIN ASSEMBLY OF GOD REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ESTABLISH A COMMUNITY SERVICE AGENCY FOR SPRINGBOARD, A TEMPORARY SHELTER FOR ABUSED, ADOLESCENT WOMEN (PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE COPPER MOUNTAIN ASSEMBLY OF GOD, ON THE NORTH SIDE OF TANGERINE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 1/4 MILE WEST OF LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD) 9. RESOLUTION NO. (R)99-43 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, SUPPORTING THE PROPOSED INCORPORATION OF "THE VILLAGE OF CASAS ADOBES, ARIZONA, PURSUANT TO ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES SECTION 9-101.01, WITH CONDITIONS 10. PUBLIC HEARING — ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-23 OV8-99-1 MIRAGE HOMES REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR SHORT- TERM RENTALS IN THE RANCHO VISTOSO PLANNED AREA 04/07/99 Agenda, Council Regular Session 4 DEVELOPMENT MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT — BUILDINGS 1 — 8 AND COMMON ELEMENTS OF VISTOSO GOLF CASITAS II, (PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTH OF VISTOSO HIGHLANDS DRIVE, WEST OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD 11. OV12-98-21 VISTOSO GOLF CASITAS II, FINAL PLAT, RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 11, PARCEL AJ (PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTH OF VISTOSO HIGHLANDS DRIVE AND WEST OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD) 12. OV12-98-21 VISTOSO GOLF CASITAS II, LANDSCAPE PLAN RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 11, PARCEL AJ (PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTH OF VISTOSO HIGHLANDS DRIVE AND WEST OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD) 13. OV12-99-3 RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 10J, THE INN AT VISTOSO DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD AND VISTOSO HIGHLANDS DRIVE) 14. OV12-99-3 RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 10J, THE INN AT VISTOSO LANDSCAPE PLAN (PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD AND VISTOSO HIGHLANDS DRIVE) 15. OV12-98-12 CANADA CROSSROADS DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A PROPOSED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONALLY ZONED C-N (PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LAMBERT LANE AND LA CANADA DRIVE) 16. OV12-98-12 CANADA CROSSROADS LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR A PROPOSED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONALLY ZONED C-N (PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LAMBERT LANE AND LA CANADA DRIVE) 17. OV12-98-18 SIGMA TECHNOLOGIES EXPANSION, DEVELOPMENT PLAN, (PROPERTY LOCATED ON LOT 1 OF THE FOOTHILLS BUSINESS PARK, WEST OF THE ALLIED SIGNAL BUILDING) 18. EXTENDING THE TERMS OF THE FIRE ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBERS TOWN MANAGER'S REPORT ENGINEER'S REPORT FINANCE DIRECTOR'S REPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S REPORT 04/07/99 Agenda, Council Regular Session 5 POLICE CHIEF'S REPORT WATER UTILITY DIRECTOR'S REPORT COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS CALL TO AUDIENCE— According to the Arizona Open Meeting Law, the Town Council may only discuss matters listed on the Town Council Agenda. Matters brought up by the public under "Call to Audience" cannot be discussed by the Town Council, as they have not been placed on the . a endaAnyitems must be addressed to the whole Council, not a specific g member. In order to speak during "Call to Audience", please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. ADJOURNMENT .POSTED: 03/31/98 4:30 P.M. Ih A packet of agenda materials as listed above is available for public inspection at least 24 hours prior to the Council meeting in the office of the Town Clerk between the hours of 8:30 a.m. — 5:00p.m. The Town of Oro Valley complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If any person with a disability needs any type of accommodation, please notify Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk, at 297-2591. 04/07/99 Agenda, Council Regular Session 6 INSTRUCTIONS TO SPEAKERS Members of the public have the right to speak during any posted public hearing. However, those items not listed as a public hearing are for consideration and action by the Town Council during the course of their business meeting. Members of the public may be allowed to speak on these topics at the discretion of the Chair. If you wish to address the Town Council on any item(s) on this agenda, please complete a speaker card located on the Agenda table at the back of the room and give it to the Town Clerk. Please indicate on the speaker card which item number and topic you wish to speak on, or if you wish to speak during "Call to Audience", please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. Please step forward to the podium when the Mayor announces the item(s) on the agenda which you are interested in addressing. 1. Please state your name and address for the record. 2. Speak only on the issue currently being discussed by Council. Please organize your speech, you will only be allowed to address the Council once regarding the topic being discussed. 3. Please limit your comments to 3 minutes. 4. During "Call to Audience" you may address the Council on any issue you wish. 5. Any member of the public speaking must speak in a courteous and respectful manner to those present. Thank you for your cooperation. A MINUTES ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL j.. STUDY SESSION y. MARCH 15, 1999 _ ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11,000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE STUDY SESSION - AT OR AFTER 5:30 P.M. CALL TO ORDER - 5:40 P.M. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Paul Loomis, Mayor Dick Johnson, Council Member Fran LaSala, Council Member EXCUSED: Paul Parisi, Vice Mayor Cheryl Skalsky, Council Member STAFF PRESENT: Chuck Sweet, Town Manager Don Chatfield, Community Development Director Tobin Sidles, Town Attorney Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk DISCUSSION REGARDING OV9-99-21 TRANSLATIONAL ZONING OF THE ARIZONA DISTRICT COUNCIL OF THE ASSEMBLIES OF GOD PROPERTY FROM PIMA COUNTY SR TO ORO VALLEY R1-144, WITH CHURCH DEVELOPMENT ENTITLEMENTS The discussion was broken down into three parts: 1. Translational Zoning: Dr. Chatfield explained that Arizona State Law requires that a municipality is required to translate the zoning within six months from annexation to the nearest compatible zone without giving any greater entitlement than enjoyed in Pima County. Existing zoning is suburban ranch(SR). Primary uses for SR include 1 home per 3.3 acres. Oro Valley's nearest compatible zone is the R1-144 district. However, he stated the differences between the 2 zones include building heights and setbacks and associated uses. He explained that in Pima County one of the uses allowed by right is church uses. The Oro Valley R1-144 does not include this use. He explained that under Council direction, at the time of translational zoning, if there is a property owner that enjoys an additional entitlement in Pima County, we have been translating that entitlement to Oro Valley when requested by the applicant. Dr. Chatfield explained that this translational zoning request will include a church use. 03/15/99 Minutes, Council Study Session 2 Council Member Johnson stated that property owners should receive equal rights of what they had in Pima County when translating to Oro Valley zoning. In response to a comment made by Mayor Loomis, Dr. Chatfield stated he can't think of a time when Oro Valley has deviated from our performance standards in terms of construction. However, we have made allowances to retain land use rights. Dr. Chatfield and Mr. Sweet reviewed what is covered with property owners at the time a proposed annexation is under consideration. 2. Church plan and how it fits into the zoning: Dr. Chatfield reviewed the site coverage issue that would limit the disturbance of the site to 30%. He stated that the applicant had previously requested 55% disturbance, however they have withdrawn their request in a letter dated March 12, 1999 and will comply with the 30% site disturbance limitation. Dr. Chatfield explained that the applicant is requesting that in addition to the church entitlements and permission to apply for a conditional use permit, that 2 additional conditions be added: 1. If the urban growth boundary is adjusted to exclude this site the intensity of the development shall be comparable to the Town's PS & C zoning district. 2. Any revegetated areas (including retention basins &utility easements) be excluded in calculating the allowable development area as dictated by the urban growth boundary. (As long as it meets the landscaping requirements that are provided in the Tangerine Road Corridor). Dr. Chatfield referred to the site map with the proposed uses of the site. He stated that staff has discussed these additional conditions with the applicant and are open to considering them. According to staff analysis, the applicant would be able to construct all of Phase I within the 30% envelope recommended by staff. In answer to a question by Council Member LaSala, Dr. Chatfield stated that if the urban growth boundary is shifted to the north,this translational zoning would stand, because the urban growth boundary is a policy. That means that if that gets changed, the property owner would need to come back to the town with a request to amend that translational zoning. If we agree to use the P S & C zoning standards, that will establish a maximum envelope (minimum of 25% open space net lot area& 75% allowable site coverage). He reviewed the uses allowed under P S & C district. Dr. Chatfield reviewed the percentage of uses proposed for the site: Gym—2.19% Worship Center—3.43% Total building coverage—less than 9% in buildings. Total coverage including parking areas, etc. - 29.90% 03/15/99 Minutes, Council Study Session 3 Detention/Retention basin - 3.12% In response to a question by Council Member LaSala, the primary issue to resolve is the design of the detention/retention basin. He suggested if the basin is designed naturally with earth walls that can be revegetated, we are open to considering this. He discouraged the use of cement. Council Member Johnson encouraged coming up with a creative way to handle the drainage on that property. Mayor Loomis pointed out that the action Council will take on Wednesday will be to translate the zoning from Pima County SR to Oro Valley R1-144. The plans and conditional use permit are totally independent of the translational zoning. Mayor Loomis pointed out that this plan meets the 30% requirement. 3. Urban growth boundary: Dr. Chatfield explained that the urban growth boundary was included in the General Plan approved in 1996. The intent was to exclude increased intensity beyond the urban growth boundary during the life of the plan for the following reasons: 1. Concurrency— suitable carrying capacity in the infrastructure to allow increased intensity (roadway, water& sewer capacity). 2. In the case of the properties included to the north of Tangerine Road, the judgment of the community, planning team and Town Council was that during the life span of this general plan there wasn't adequate carrying capacity to encourage more intense uses. There was also concern with the rural character of that area and that we try to maintain the northwest part of Oro Valley with the suburban ranch characteristics. Dr. Chatfield stated that although it is premature for him to say what will happen with the urban growth boundary in the future, it does seem clear that by the time the updated boundary is adopted in 2001, it is likely there will be substantial improvements made or being planned for infrastructure for that area. The key question is our town's character for that area. Mayor Loomis pointed out that there was significant public discussion on establishing the urban growth boundary. Discussion followed regarding how the Sector Boards were developed to ensure full representation of citizens, developers, environmentalists, planners, etc. throughout all areas of the Town. 03/15/99 Minutes, Council Study Session 4 Council Member Johnson stated he supports the basic concept but we need to watch how our current boundaries will fill in with development, which is happening quickly. He pointed out that we have done a good job with creating our wildlife corridors and open spaces, etc. ADJOURNMENT Council Member Johnson MOVED to adjourn the study session at 6:25 p.m. Motion seconded by Council Member LaSala. MOTION carried 3 —0. Respectfully submitted, Kathryn E. Cuvelier, CMC Town Clerk MINUTES ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION 441) MARCH 17, 1999 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 4A> 11,000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER—7:02 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Paul Loomis, Mayor Paul Parisi, Vice Mayor Dick Johnson, Council Member Fran LaSala, Council Member PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Loomis led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS Town Manager Chuck Sweet reviewed the upcoming meetings. CALL TO AUDIENCE John Leigh, 1213 E. Camino Diestro, Oro Valley Police Officer and representing the Fraternal Order of Police (FOP) Lodge#53, reviewed the FOP's Initiative process. He stated that the ballots were counted today (March 17th) for the FOP Initiative. He stated that out of 3500 voters who voted for the Initiative, 2600 voted in favor of the FOP Initiative (Mr. Leigh rounded off the votes.) He stated that the voters have stated that it was okay to recognize the FOP as a bargaining agency and to go for binding arbitration. Mr. Leigh urged the Council to reconsider its position on the Initiative and to adopt the ordinance. Bill Adler, 10720 N. Eagle Eye Place, stated that Agenda Item#11, Selection of the Vice Mayor, should be removed from the agenda as it is not consistent with the Recall Campaign to return to civility and respect. He further stated that currently pre-annexation agreements do not require the same notification to immediate neighbors as other land use changes and he recommended that the Town's Planning and Zoning Commission look into changing the requirements and expand the 600 foot notification limit for major land changes. Mr. Adler suggested that no significant rezonings be approved before the General Plan is amended and adopted. He stated that the Town's citizens have a great deal to say and he recommended that the Town utilize those citizens that have graduated from the Citizens Planning Institute early in the Technical Advisory process along with industry experts to provide a balance of point of view. Mr. Adler also suggested that in 03/17/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 2 order to accelerate the decision on alternative water resources, a moratorium be placed on building permits until an alternative to ground water use is found. Debra Oro, 991 W. Wheatgrass Place, stated that she has seen a lot of things take place in Oro Valley in the time that she has lived here. She stated that her and her husband's motto is "Do the right thing." She stated that it was very important that we as a community come together in unity. Ms. Oro stated that the past election was a"striking blow" by the people in the town to make their voices known. She stated that the election of the Vice Mayor a year ago took place at the beginning of the meeting. She requested that to maintain a feeling of unity, the citizens should be able to congratulate the new Council Member and the new Vice Mayor at the beginning of the meeting. Joe Waskiewicz, 9440 N. Raleigh Place, requested that Agenda Item#11, Selection of the Vice Mayor, be moved to the beginning of the meeting. He also stated that he supported the Fraternal Order of Police request to move forward on the Initiative. Emily Anne Sleigh, 12417 N. Copper Queen Way, stated that as a concerned citizen, she would also like to see Agenda Item#11,Selection of the Vice Mayor, moved forward on the agenda. She said that this would enable citizens who will not be able to attend the Council meeting in its entirety, to witness the vote of the Vice Mayor. 1. RESOLUTION NO. (R)99-31 CANVASS OF THE VOTE, MARCH 9, 1999 SPECIAL/RECALL ELECTION Town Clerk Kathryn Cuvelier reported that Resolution No. (R)99-31 declares and adopts the results of the Special/Recall Election held on March 9, 1999. The totals from Pima County Elections reflect Wayne Bryant with 2,379 votes (61%) and Cheryl Skalsky with 1,445 (37%). MOTION: Council Member Johnson MOVED to approve Resolution No. (R)99-31. Council Member LaSala SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 4—0. la. SWEARING IN CEREMONY—OATH OF OFFICE Town Clerk Kathryn Cuvelier administered the Oath of Office to newly elected Council Member Wayne Bryant. Council Member Bryant thanked his family and those who helped and supported him through the campaign process. He stated that the people's vote was for change and accountability. He stated that the citizens need to be aware of the truth of supplemental water agreements and the transfer of responsibility of bringing an alternative water source to the Town. He stated that it is the responsibility of the elected officials to provide information to the citizens. Council Member Bryant also stated that he would request an independent audit to look into several areas including the Municipal Property Corporation and the Water Company. He stated that with this information, the community's most urgent needs can be addressed. He stated that he felt a super majority 03/17/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 3 vote should be required to change the General Plan. He stated that we need to address rapid growth and its impact on the Town. Council Member Bryant said that he also supports the towns of Tortolita and Casas Adobes and their right to self-determination and he would like to see the communities work together as good neighbors. He stated his goal was for openness and honesty and asked for the citizen's help and participation. Mayor Loomis recessed the meeting at 7:25. The meeting resumed at 7:37 p.m. 2. CONSENT AGENDA At Council Member Bryant's request, the Mayor removed items G, K, and L from the Consent Agenda. MOTION: Council Member Johnson MOVED to approve the Consent Agenda Items A —F, and H—J. Council Member LaSala SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 —0. A. Minutes—2-22-99; 2-24-99; 3-1-99; 3-3-99 B. Police Report—January 1999 C. Finance Report—January 1999 D. Building Codes Activity Report—February 1999 E. Resolution No. (R)99-32 Accepting a waiver to the No Access Easement to allow access to the rear of a lot for the construction of a pool at David Ortiz residence, Lot 32, Copper Creek II Block C F. Resolution(R)99-33 Accepting a Waiver to the Oro Valley Town Code, Section 11-3-5 Vehicle Weight Limitations as requested by Alvaro Alvarez of the United States Postal Service G. Resolution No. (R)99-34 Approving and authorizing the execution of a contract with the AAA Landscape Company for landscape maintenance services of town facilities (Pulled for discussion.) H. Granting permission for ice cream vendor to sell on the streets within Oro Valley Town limits pursuant to Section 8-1-6 of the Oro Valley Town Code I. Resolution No. (R)99-35 Accepting a License Agreement for the installation and maintenance of landscaping elements within the La Canada Drive right of way as requested by Beztak Companies, owner of the Golf Villas Apartment Complex J. Resolution No. (R)99-36 Awarding a contract proposal to Westland Resources, Inc. to provide Engineering Design and Project Management Services for capital improvements within Oro Valley Water Improvement District No. 1 K. Oro Valley Water Utility Commission—request for extension to file annual report(Pulled for discussion.) L. Consideration of Town Magistrate Selection Committee recommendations to appoint George Dunscomb as Town Magistrate effective April 8, 1999 —April 7, 2001 (Pulled for discussion.) 03/17/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 4 G. RESOLUTION NO. (R)99-34 APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A CONTRACT WITH THE AAA LANDSCAPE COMPANY FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES OF TOWN FACILITIES _ Community Development Director Don Chatfield reported that on February 12th bids were opened for routine landscaping maintenance of Town facilities. These areas include Oracle Road medians at Greenock Drive south to Linda Vista, Camino Cortaro to Linda Vista, the Pusch Ridge Access Trailhead, the rest stop at First Avenue and Oracle Road, and the grounds around Town Hall and the Police Department. Dr. Chatfield also stated that the base bid included routine mowing and tree trimming work at Dennis Weaver Park. Dr. Chatfield explained that in addition to the base bid, bids for two Add Alternates were received. Add Alternate I was for turf mowing at the proposed Canyon del Oro (CDO) Riverfront Park site and Add Alternate II was for tree trimming also at the CDO Riverfront Park. He explained that these bid amounts would be used as such time as the CDO Riverfront Park opens and the Town assumes the maintenance responsibilities. Dr. Chatfield stated that bid prices were also received for hourly rates for extra work if needed. He stated that consistent with Town policy to award the bid to the lowest responsible bidder, staff is recommending that the bid be awarded to AAA Landscape in the amount of$50,030 (Base Bid) and$21,450 (Add Alternate I & II.) In answer to a question from Council Member Bryant regarding liability against undocumented workers, Town Attorney Tobin Sidles stated that Oro Valley is required to comply with the U.S. Immigration Act and the Town's contracts have provided wording to protect the Town. MOTION: Council Member Bryant MOVED to approve Resolution No. (R)99-34 authorizing staff to enter into an agreement for Landscape Maintenance Services for Town Facilities with AAA Landscape in the amount of$50,030 (Base Bid) and approving Add Alternates I & II ($21,450) and the Extra Work Rates as listed in the proposal for any unforeseen work or repairs that might be needed during the contract year. Council Member Johnson SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 —0. K. ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY COMMISSION—REQUEST FOR EXTENSION TO FILE ANNUAL REPORT Water Utility Director David Hook reported that the request to postpone the rendering of the Annual Water Report, is a result of the Water Utility Commission and staff trying to complete the analysis of data that provides recommendations for capital improvements and the budget. He explained that some delays had been encountered while compiling the data. Mr. Hook stated that staff expects to have final data to the Commission in April and the draft report prepared for Council by the end of April. In answer to a question from Council Member Bryant, Mr. Hook explained that the Water Report has required an extension for the past two years. He explained that the intent of 03/17/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 5 the March reporting date was to have information for the budget process. He explained that their challenge was to have enough information prepared late enough in the fiscal year to have sufficient data to analyze and still be ready for the budget cycle. He stated that the Commission is looking at requesting a change in the deadline date for the Annual _ Water Report. MOTION: Council Member Bryant MOVED to approve the request to postpone the rendering of the Annual Report of the Water Utility Commission until the end of April, 1999. Council Member Johnson SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 —0. L. CONSIDERATION OF TOWN MAGISTRATE SELECTION COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS TO APPOINT GEORGE DUNSCOMB AS TOWN MAGISTRATE EFFECTIVE APRIL 8, 1999—APRIL 7, 2001 Outside Legal Counsel Frank Cassidy reported that as a result of the expiration of the current Town Magistrate's term of office and in keeping with the practice established in 1997, the Town advertised for the position of Town Magistrate in January, 1999. Applications were screened by the Human Resources Director using criteria extracted from the existing approved job description and interviews were conducted by the Selection Committee which was comprised of Mayor Loomis, Council Member LaSala and Human Resources Director Jeff Grant. Mr. Cassidy explained that the Selection Committee has recommended that George Dunscomb be appointed as Town Magistrate for the term beginning April 8, 1999. In answer to a question from Council Member Bryant, Mr. Cassidy confirmed that litigation was still pending with Susan Agrillo but there should be no effect on the selection of the Town Magistrate. MOTION: Council Member Johnson MOVED to appoint Mr. George Dunscomb as Town Magistrate to a two-year term beginning April 8, 1999 pursuant to the terms of the attached Employment Agreement. Council Member LaSala SECONDED the motion. DISCUSSION: In answer to a question from Vice Mayor Parisi, Mayor Loomis stated that the process was the same as it was two years prior. The Committee strictly followed Town procedures and he felt that everything had been done correctly regarding the hiring of Town personnel. Motion carried, 5 —0. 3. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING—ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-07, OV9-98- 19 REQUEST TO AMEND THE RANCHO VISTOSO PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT,AS IT PERTAINS TO NEIGHBORHOOD 10 PARCEL J: 1) BUILDING HEIGHT; 2) PARKING REQUIREMENTS LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF RANCHO VISTOSO BLVD. AND VISTOSO HIGHLANDS DRIVE (CONTINUED FROM 3-3-99) 03/17/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 6 Community Development Director Don Chatfield reported that the request to amend the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development (PAD) was first heard by Council on March 3, 1999. At that meeting, the applicant requested an additional height change from 38 feet to 40 feet. Staff requested a continuance to look at the additional two feet change in _ height. Dr. Chatfield explained that there is currently an application for a Radisson Hotel to be built on the northwest corner of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard and Vistoso Highlands Drive. He explained that the applicant is requesting a PAD amendment for a reduction in the parking requirements by approximately 25% due to the location and nature of the development. The applicant is also requesting an amendment to the Rancho Vistoso PAD height limits which provides for a building height not to exceed 34 feet or three stories. Dr. Chatfield explained that the applicant is requesting that the height limit be changed to 40 feet in order to build the hotel. Dr. Chatfield reported that the Planning and Zoning Commission heard the PAD amendment requests on January 5, 1999 and recommended approval of reduction of parking and the increase in height to 38 feet(40 foot request was requested later at the March 3rd Town Council meeting.) He explained that staff has reviewed the request for the increase of two feet to a total of forty feet and is willing to support the request provided that the height change be limited to the seven buildings on the west side and the three buildings adjacent to the pool area on the west of the property. Dr. Chatfield stated that staff could support the additional height on those specific buildings due to the topography of the site. He stated that because of the depressed topography, the additional height has no significant impact on the view shed to the west of the Tortolita Mountains. In answer to questions from Mayor Loomis, Charles Hulsey, The WLB Group, representing the applicant Southwest Properties, explained that they are asking for the 40 foot height limit on the 7 buildings along the west side. The topography "rolls off' into a drainage way and these buildings can be built with three stories on the back-side and two stories on the front. Mr. Hulsey explained that they are only asking for the extended height limit on two buildings adjacent to the pool as they will sit lower than the parking lot side. He also explained that they did not do a view shed analysis looking north from Rancho Vistoso Boulevard as the height of the buildings closest to the Boulevard are less than the highest building on the site. In answer to a question from Council Member LaSala, Mr. Hulsey explained that if the situation arises that there would be overflow parking from the hotel, they have made arrangements with the Golf Club at Vistoso to utilize their parking lot. A shuttle valet service from the hotel to the Golf Club would be provided. Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. Larry Meeks, 931 W. San Martin Drive, representing the architects for the site, stated that he was available to answer any questions from Council. Mayor Loomis closed the public hearing. 03/17/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 7 In answer to questions from Council Member Bryant, Mr. Hulsey explained that they are requesting the extra height in order to provide nine foot ceilings within the rooms and that they are dealing with a floor structure that is "thicker"to provide for the duct work -� _ and piping. He also explained that the three story buildings would sit lower than the bulk of the site, so they would not obstruct the view shed. He explained that the salvaged landscape materials would be utilized to help obscure views along Vistoso Highlands Drive and Rancho Vistoso Boulevard. Mayor Loomis asked to have a condition added to the Conditions of Approval to document the overflow parking agreement with the Golf Club of Vistoso. Vice Mayor Parisi stated that he liked the alternative of using a shuttle service as it would protect the desert by not having to provide extra parking. In answer to a concern expressed by Council Member Bryant, Dr. Chatfield stated that it would not set a precedent as these types of requests are reviewed "within the context of the request." He stated that from a planning standpoint, it does not establish a precedent as long as it is tied to a view shed analysis and characteristics of the site. MOTION: Council Member Johnson MOVED to approve OV9-98-19, request to amend the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development, as it pertains to Neighborhood 10 Parcel J: 1) Building height; 2) parking requirements, subject to the conditions as listed in Exhibit"A" as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission and to include that over flow parking will be sent to the Golf Club. A) 1. The request for height change from 34 to 40 feet maximum shall be limited to the 7 buildings on the west and the 3 building adjacent to the pool area. 2. The parking area shall be reduced by 25% from the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised requirements. 3. Overflow parking shall be addressed by an arrangement between the Golf Course at Vistoso and the hotel. Council Member LaSala SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 —0. 4. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING—ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-11, OV9-99- 21, TRANSLATIONAL ZONING OF THE ARIZONA DISTRICT COUNCIL OF THE ASSEMBLIES OF GOD PROPERTY, FROM PIMA COUNTY SR TO R1- 144 WITH CHURCH DEVELOPMENT ENTITLEMENTS (CONTINUED FROM 3-3-99) (Council Member Bryant excused himself from this agenda item due to a conflict of interest.) Community Development Director Don Chatfield reported that consideration of Ordinance No. (0)99-11 was continued from the March 3, 1999 Council meeting to 03/17/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 8 further study provisions of the translational zoning. He explained that whenever the Town annexes property it is required by Arizona State Statutes to translate the zoning to Oro Valley's nearest equivalent. The Arizona District Council of the Assemblies of God property would be translated from Pima County SR to Oro Valley R1-144. Dr. Chatfield _ stated that staff recommends approval of the translation of zoning to the R1-144 District with the church use entitlements on the property as provided under the Pima County Zoning. Dr. Chatfield further explained that the primary issue discussed during the March 3rd Council meeting was regarding site coverage. The Church at that time requested disturbance of up to 55% of the site. Based on the General Plan and the Urban Growth Boundary in the area, staff recommended that no more than 30% of site be disturbed. Dr. Chatfield stated that at a Study Session held on March 15th, the Church submitted a letter withdrawing their request to disturb up to 55% of the site coverage. He also stated that the Church submitted an alternate site plan and asked that retention/detention basins be excluded in calculating the disturbed area. He explained that staff has analyzed the site plan and can support the proposal as long as the detention basins are configured with a general slope and have no concrete on the sides so the basins can be revegetated. Dr. Chatfield stated that the revised site plan has a total disturbance of between 29.8%— 29.9% of the total property. Dr. Chatfield stated that a separate request for a Conditional Use Permit for a shelter home would be addressed at a future Council meeting. Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. Reverend William Seale, Pastor of the Copper Mountain Assembly of God Church and representing the Arizona District Council of the Assemblies of God, confirmed that the District Council has withdrawn their request for the additional site disturbance. He explained that their new site plan conforms to the 30% development issue. Reverend Seale further requested that in addition to the church entitlements, the Church be allowed to apply for a Conditional Use Permit to operate the Springboard Shelter, a temporary shelter for adolescent women. Ken Smith, 13 600 N. Como Drive, stated that he is the liaison for the La Cholla Air Park. He pointed out that the proposed church and shelter are in the flight pattern of the Air Park. Dorita Brady, 1885 W. Limewood, stated that she served on the General Plan Sector Board. She said that she was opposed to any changes to the current Land Use Plan. She expressed her concerns and asked that Council support the General Plan. Kirk Hunt, 12428 Mesquite Crest Way, stated that it was the intent of the Church to build a house of worship and a shelter for girls who have been victimized. He stated that in Pima County, their property had church entitlements. He stated that the Church is asking to be allowed to use their property as it was intended. 03/17/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 9 Claire Klingler, 12151 N. Como Drive, stated that since the last Council meeting, petitions from surrounding neighbors have been submitted to the Council opposing the shelter care facility. She stated that they are not opposed to the church, but they do not _ feel the shelter home for abused girls fits into the residential rural neighborhood. She stated that the original proposal had the shelter sitting just 57 feet from their property line and she was concerned. Ms. Klingler stated that they object to a Conditional Use Permit being considered for the shelter care home and asked Council to consider their feelings. Mayor Loomis closed the public hearing. In answer to questions from Council Member Johnson and Mayor Loomis, Dr. Chatfield stated that the current request before Council was for a translational zoning from Pima County to Oro Valley zoning. He stated that it is not a land use change and staff's analysis was to respect the Urban Growth Boundary and make the development intensity on the property follow the General Plan to make the proposed project fit the rural character of the area. He also explained that the requirement for a Conditional Use Permit would also be required in Pima County. MOTION: Council Member LaSala MOVED to approve Ordinance (0)99-11, Translational Zoning of the Arizona District Council of the Assemblies of God property, from Pima County SR to R1-144. Council Member Johnson SECONDED the motion. DISCUSSION: Vice Mayor Parisi stated that he was sensitive to the property owners' rights. He stated that the current Council is also sensitive to the neighbors wishes. He stated that in the future as Tangerine Road develops, another Council could approve Circle K's, etc. He stated that when a church is allowed, you are not eliminating desert, but eliminating ungodliness. He stated that he understands the neighbor's concerns regarding the shelter, but the residents would be under the supervision of the Church. He urged the neighbors to open up dialog with the Church for a better understanding of what the Church is proposing. Motion carried, 4—0. Mayor Loomis called a recess at 8:30 p.m. Meeting resumed at 8:37 p.m. MOTION: Council Member Bryant MOVED to place consideration of Agenda Item #11 before Agenda Item#5. Council Member LaSala SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 3 —2 with Vice Mayor Parisi and Council Member Johnson opposed. 11. SELECTION OF VICE MAYOR MOTION: Council Member Bryant MOVED to NOMINATE Council Member LaSala as Vice Mayor. Council Member LaSala stated that he wanted to do what was best for theTown. He stated that he saw the results of the past election as the citizens saying that they are tired 03/17/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 10 of polarization of politics. He stated that he felt the Town can now move forward and work together as civil individuals. He stated that he knows what he can and can not do, and he can not do what he thinks is not the right thing. He declined the nomination stating that he was not the appropriate person at this time for the position of Vice Mayor. He stated that Council Member Johnson has worked very hard for the Town and he supports him as Vice Mayor. (Council Member Bryant's motion failed due to lack of second.) MOTION: Council Member LaSala MOVED to NOMINATE Council Member Johnson as Vice Mayor. Vice Mayor Parisi SECONDED the nomination. DISCUSSION: Vice Mayor Parisi stated that he was proud to have served as Vice Mayor for the last four years. He stated that the title of Vice Mayor is just an honorary one and Council Member Johnson is an honorable person and deserves the title. He stated that in the future, he thought the position should not be looked upon as a political one. He stated that other communities rotate the title of Vice Mayor so that it is not something that is looked upon as political among the Council. Vice Mayor Parisi stated that in good faith he supports Council Member Johnson as Vice Mayor and the Council should look towards mending rather than trying to do political "digs." AMENDMENT TO THE MOTION: Mayor Loomis asked to amend the motion to direct staff to begin changing the Town Code to rotate the office of the Vice Mayor. During the process, staff can determine what the proper term would be. Council Member LaSala and Vice Mayor Parisi agreed to the amendment. MOTION AS AMENDED carried, 5 —0. 5. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING—ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-15, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. (0)96-27 TO PROVIDE A SUPPLEMENT TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY GENERAL PLAN—OPEN SPACE/RECREATION ELEMENT—TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PARKS, OPEN SPACE, AND TRAILS MASTER PLAN (CONTINUED FROM 3-3-99) Community Development Director Don Chatfield reported that Ordinance (0)99-15 was continued from the March 3, 1999 Council meeting to address items of the Plan that were not included in the draft. He reported that items to be addressed were a bibliography and definitions, particularly that of Open Space. Staff has met with Gary Chandler, member of the Parks and Recreation Board, to draft a bibliography and work on the glossary. Dr. Chatfield reported that a rough draft of the bibliography and references have been prepared. He explained that since the last Council meeting, the consultant has updated the maps and financial information in the Plan. Dr. Chatfield further commented that the Parks, Open Space, and Trails (POST) Master Plan is a policy item, not an ordinance. He explained that it provides a"road map" and lays out specific action steps to address issues. Dr. Chatfield stated that staff 03/17/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 11 recommends adoption of the POST Master Plan Update. Staff also recommends that the Council direct Planning Staff to work with the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board to complete three appendices for Council's review within five months. These appendices would be: Appendix A—Glossary, Appendix B — Sub-Regional Needs Analysis, and Appendix C —Bibliography. Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. There being no speakers, the public hearing was closed. MOTION: Council Member LaSala MOVED to adopt Ordinance (0)99-15, amending Ordinance (0)96-27 to provide a supplement to the Town of Oro Valley General Plan Opens Space/Recreation Element—Town of Oro Valley Parks, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan with the Addition of a Glossary, Sub-Regional Needs Analysis, and Bibliography as presented in the staff recommendation. Vice Mayor Johnson SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 —0. 6. PUBLIC HEARING—ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-16 OV9-99-01, VILLAGES OF LA CANADA PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT (PAD) AMENDMENT TO BLOCK A CHANGING THE DESIGNATION FROM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL Community Development Director Don Chatfield reported that Ordinance (0)99-16 provides for an amendment to the Villages of La Canada Planned Area Development (PAD). The applicant has requested to change the designation to reduce the density in Block A. He explained that the current zoning is for High Density Residential allowing multi-family apartment structures on the property. Dr. Chatfield reviewed the history of the property. He further stated that the current request is to "down zone"the parcel to allow for development of 80 single family homes on lots of approximately 7,200 square feet. Dr. Chatfield explained that even though the proposal represents a dramatic reduction in density, it is still necessary to amend the adopted PAD to change the land use. He reported that the Planning and Zoning Commission and staff recommend approval of the PAD amendment. In answer to a question from Vice Mayor Johnson regarding the Condition for Approval, Dr. Chatfield explained that the Oro Valley Zoning Code stipulates expiration periods for rezonings. He stated this was to discourage speculative rezonings. He explained that he has not heard any objections from the applicant on the 210 day time limit. Charles Hulsey, The WLB Group, representing the applicant Kaufman and Broad, stated that the condition was part of the request for the down zoning to allow for the filing of the tentative map. He asked that the condition for the 210 day time limit remain intact. Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. Bill Adler, 10720 N. Eagle Eye Place, stated that it was his recollection that when the land was originally rezoned for the apartments, the Development Review Board turned down a grading waiver but he thought that the Council approved it. He stated that he felt 03/17/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 12 if a grading waiver is necessary when the land use and application significantly changes, then the Development Review Board should have the opportunity to look at the grading waiver again. Mayor Loomis closed the public hearing. In answer to a question from Council Member LaSala, Dr. Chatfield explained that on June 14, 1994, a grading waiver was approved for Block A by the Town Council with four conditions attached. He explained that it is the interpretation of Bryant Nodine, Planning and Zoning Administrator, that the grading waiver is still active on the site and does not to be applied for again. He stated that if a resident was concerned, he could appeal the Planning and Zoning Administrator's interpretation through the Board of Adjustment. MOTION: Vice Mayor Johnson MOVED to approve OV9-99-1,the Villages of La Canada PAD Amendment, Block A, to medium density residential (MDR), subject to the condition in Exhibit"A". A) 1. The above referenced property may be developed as single-family residential homes. If the final plat shall not have been approved by the Town of Oro Valley (including the expiration of all administrative or other appeal) within 210 days after the approval date of the PAD amendment,the single-family land use entitlement shall automatically revert back to the former apartment use entitlement. Council Member LaSala SECONDED the motion. DISCUSSION: In answer to a question from Council Member Bryant regarding water run-off, Mr. Hulsey explained that they will be diverting water out of the northern edge of the site into a channel. Water off the streets will be diverted out into a drainage channel and they will be solving problems that have been previously experienced. Mr. Hulsey explained that there is a limitation of how much water can be on the streets. Motion carried, 4— 1, with Council Member Bryant opposed. 7. PUBLIC HEARING—ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-17 OV9-98-2A AMENDING THE RANCHO VISTOSO PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT FOR NEIGHBORHOOD 11,REALIGNMENT OF THE EQUESTRIAN/HIKING TRAIL Community Development Director Don Chatfield reported that the applicant requested amendments to the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development(PAD) in Neighborhood 11 on May 6, 1998. He explained that one of the two unresolved issues was regarding the equestrian/hiking trail requirements and that as part of the motion made on May 6th, the Council stipulated that the issue be referred directly back to the Council. 03/17/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 13 Dr. Chatfield stated that in the May 6th amendment request, the applicant proposed that the Pima County trail along the westernmost wash be constructed outside of Neighborhood 11. The applicant also proposed to relocate the PAD trail at the western edge of Neighborhood 11, outside of Stone Canyon. He explained that the proposed _ amendment addresses both of these public trails, as well as a private trail for Stone Canyon residents only. Dr. Chatfield reported that staff has looked at the issue with regard to Tortolita Mountain Park and access into the park. He stated that the trail on the approved PAD map runs south to the westernmost wash on the northern part of Neighborhood 11 and the southern point of the proposed trail begins outside the far western edge of Neighborhood 11 (which is also outside the Town of Oro Valley.) He explained that the trail crosses the northwestern corner of Neighborhood 11 and then goes north outside the PAD and the Town. Following the topography, the trail re-enters the PAD going generally northeast, exiting the PAD and Town about halfway into the far northern part of Neighborhood 11. He explained that the part of the trail in the PAD lies entirely within the approved no build area of the PAD (within the open space area.) Dr. Chatfield reported that the proposed alignment as presented by the applicant was developed in the field by the applicant in cooperation with Planning Staff and Pima County Parks Department Staff. He explained that it is consistent with the Pima County Trails Plan and the Town's Parks, Open Space and Trails (POST) Plan. Dr. Chatfield explained that other trails for consideration are the Rancho Vistoso Pedestrian Trail and the Stone Canyon Pedestrian Trail. The Rancho Vistoso Trail is a public trail on the approved PAD map for Neighborhood 11 and is a continuation of the Neighborhood 10 trail. The Stone Canyon Trail is intended to be a private trail within a gated community. The proposed Stone Canyon Trail would replace the approved PAD trail in Neighborhood 11. He explained that this trail follows Tortolita Mountain Drive as it enters Stone Canyon from Vistoso Highlands Drive and then follows the road west and loops back around the Stone Canyon Golf Course existing the PAD at the eastern edge of Neighborhood 11. Dr. Chatfield further reported that Planning Staff has received a letter from Mr. Steve Anderson of the Pima County Parks and Recreation Department approving the proposed alignment of the segment of the Tortolita Foothills Trail with a revised list of conditions. These conditions include: 1. The Vistoso Partners should assist in the additional cost associated with constructing the trail and acquiring public right-of-way to access the trailhead site; 2. The Tortolita Mountain Park Access Trail shall be dedicated in fee to the public at the time platting occurs; 3. A trailhead shall be located on the two-acre buildable site identified by Vistoso Partners west of Neighborhood 11 and conveyed in fee prior to platting of the final portion of Neighborhood 11; and 4. The developer should secure a connector trail corridor a minimum of 15 feet in width between the trailhead and the agreed upon alignment for the Tortolita Foothills Trail to be dedicated in fee to the appropriate public entity at the time the trailhead site is dedicated. 03/17/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 14 Dr. Chatfield stated that staff supports the County's conditions and support adoption of the request with said conditions. Dr. Chatfield also reported that Planning Staff has received a letter from Mr. Lon Lester, a resident to the west of Oro Valley, requesting that residents in that area have an opportunity to review the trail alignment and trailhead o prior to the Council's approval. Charles Hulsey, The WLB Group, representing Vistoso Partners, stated that the northern trail alignment was not ready for consideration, and he had requested that it not be placed on the agenda as they needed more time to work with the County. Dr. Chatfield stated that if it is the applicant's desire, Council could continue consideration of the northern trail and only consider the other items. In answer to a question from Mayor Loomis, Mr. Hulsey explained that there are private easements to access the trailhead but there is not a public roadway access. In answer to a question from Council Member Bryant, Mr. Hulsey explained that they could have condemnation actions to acquire private easements if necessary. In answer to a question from Mayor Loomis, Dr. Chatfield explained that staff would be content if Council approved the Rancho Vistoso Pedestrian Trail and the Stone Canyon Pedestrian Trail and continued the Tortolita Mountain Park Access Trail. Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. Patty Estes, 11700 N. Joi Drive (comments are attached to end of minutes.) Jan Johnson, 3885 E. Golder Ranch Road, representing Pima Trails Association, stated that they support a trail that accesses the Tortolita Mountain Park. She expressed concerns about the realignment of the proposed trail and access by mountain bikers and equestrians. She stated that she supports Pima County Parks and Recreation's recommendations and suggested that Council hold off the developers realignment until all concerns are addressed. Ken Smith, 13600 N. Como Drive, stated that the proposed trail access goes through his property and several other private properties. He said that he did not think all the property owners were aware of the proposed trail. He recommended that Council find a way to work with the property owners and extend the information to the property owners before approving the trail. Mayor Loomis closed the public hearing. MOTION: Council Member Bryant MOVED to deny Ordinance (0)99-17, OV9-98-2A for the various reasons. Motion failed due to lack of second. 03/17/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 15 MOTION: Vice Mayor Johnson MOVED to approve Ordinance (0)99-17, OV9-98-2A, a PAD amendment request for Neighborhood 11, Rancho Vistoso, Realignment of the Equestrian/Hiking Trail. This includes only the Rancho Vistoso Pedestrian Trail and the Stone Canyon Pedestrian Trail with the Tortolita Mountain Park Trail continued. Council Member LaSala SECONDED the motion. DISCUSSION: Council Member Parisi stated that he had concerns regarding the trails going through private property. He stated that many people feel trails are a better way of accessing areas, but he felt that the more trails that are made available into pristine areas, the more "trashing" we get in the desert. He stated that we need to be very selective in placing trails in the desert and keep them at a minimum. At the request of Council Member Bryant, Dr. Chatfield reviewed an overhead map of the proposed trails. Motion carried, 5 —0. 8. OV12-98-22 STONE CANYON II PRELIMINARY PLAT, COMMON AREAS A & B, RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 11 (PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE RANCHO VISTOSO PAD, NORTH AND WEST OF THE GOLF CLUB AT VISTOSO) Community Development Director Don Chatfield stated that Staff received a letter from Vistoso Partners requesting a continuance of this item for a period of thirty days to allow time to work with staff and other parties to resolve some significant issues. MOTION: Council Member LaSala MOVED to CONTINUE consideration of OV12- 98-22, Stone Canyon II Preliminary Plat until the April 21, 1999 Council meeting. Vice Mayor Johnson SECONDED the motion. Mayor Loomis opened the floor for speakers. Patty Estes, 11700 N. Joi Drive requested that Council reject the Stone Canyon Preliminary Plat as it does not follow the Harrison Environmental Wildlife Habitat Study. She stated that there should also be 300 foot buffers around all the washes and the wash crossings should be limited to a bare minimum. She said that at one point a golf cart path actually travels up the middle of the wash. Ms. Estes stated that Scott Richardson of the Arizona Game and Fish Department has offered his assistance in making the crossings more "wildlife friendly". She stated that the plat does not reflect the citizens concerns and comments that came out of the meetings with the developer nor does it comply with the intent of"open space." Richard Feinberg, 1451 E. Triton Place asked that the developer be kind and gentle and to leave untouched as much as possible the irreplaceable environment. 03/17/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 16 Allen Wright, 1005 W. Wilkenson, stated that the plan is only partial and the developer needs to present a complete plan and also meet with the residents and work with them on the issues. _ Paula Abbott, 12700 N. Bandanna Way, stated that she is not against development but she is for sensitive development. She stated that she finds it disturbing that the recommendations of the wildlife expert are not going to be followed by the developer. She asked Council to protect the wildlife that live in the Honey Bee Wash area and establish reasonable corridors by reducing the roadways that would intrude on the wash. Charles Hulsey, The WLB Group, representing the applicant, stated that there was a lot of misinformation going around. He stated that there was no intent by the developer to develop anything in or along Honey Bee Canyon. He stated that there is a plan on file with the Town that shows the complete plan and there is no development proposed anywhere near Honey Bee Canyon. He reviewed the roadway continuation and stated that it was also on file with the Town. Mr. Hulsey stated that there are no homes within 50 feet of the wash as some believe, but there are property lines within 50 feet which the law allows. He stated that they have met with the Neighborhood Coalition on two different occasions and if they or other citizens have concerns or questions, he was happy to talk with them. CALL FOR THE QUESTION: Motion for continuance carried, 5 —0. 9. APPROVAL OF PUBLIC ARTS SELECTION PROCESS FOR THE CDO RIVERFRONT PARK AND THE ORO VALLEY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CENTER Community Development Director Don Chatfield reported that the Town Code requires that one percent (1%) of all public construction be set aside for public art. Under this requirement, the Town Council appointed a Public Art Review Committee to consider artist proposals for the new Canyon del Oro Riverfront Park. He explained that a Call to Artists and the art selection process was administered by Don McGann of McGann and Associates as part of his overall park planning contract. The Call to Artists was issued in December, 1998, asking interested parties to submit representative slides of their work to be reviewed by the Public Art Review Committee. After a short list of artists was agreed upon, the artists submitted their proposals. Dr. Chatfield further explained that the Committee voted to not recommend any of the proposed artwork and to issue another Call to Artists. Dr. Chatfield reported that an artist who was not selected to participate in the proposal process had filed a protest stating that the Committee had not used clear criteria in making their judgements. Dr. Chatfield stated that in discussing the situation with Mr. McGann, Mr. McGann recommended that the Town might consider contracting with an arts council to administer the process to help avoid some of the issues raised in the first round. Dr. 03/17/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 17 Chatfield reported that he spoke with Carmen Feriend, the Executive Director of the Greater Oro Valley Arts Council (GOVAC). She stated that GOVAC was interested in participating in the process, but they were not currently prepared to take on the role. _ Dr. Chatfield stated that the Tucson/Pima Arts Council (TPAC) has stated that they are prepared to talk with the Town about administering the public art process. He explained that TPAC would charge up to ten percent (10%) of the project cost. Dr. Chatfield stated that the fees would be included in the contract for the park. He further stated that it was possible to execute a contract under which TPAC would administer the project, but would not play a role in evaluating the artists. The actual selection of the artist would take place by the members of the Town's Public Art Review Committee. Dr. Chatfield stated that staff recommends that Council approve a public arts selection process to include three elements: 1) Execution of a contract with the Tucson/Pima Arts Council to administer the selection process, including issuance of the Call to Artists, mailing of informational packets to selected artists, and procedural arrangements for the Public Art Selection Committee; 2) Signing a Memorandum of Understanding with the Greater Oro Valley Arts Council to serve as a resource in the administration of the selection process; and 3) Utilize Community Development Staff to convene the Selection Committee and to provide meeting minutes. Council Member Parisi expressed his concern with TPAC's art selection and recommended that either staff select the art or that Council not vote on the process at tonight's meeting. Dr. Chatfield clarified that the selection would be made in Oro Valley by the committee already established by Council. TPAC would only be handling the administration of the process. He stated that this process if approved, would be for the CDO Riverfront Park and the Development Services Center only. He explained that it is hoped that after these two projects are completed, GOVAC would be in a position to take over the administration of future projects. Council Member LaSala stated that this process would set up rules and hopefully eliminate any further protests. MOTION: Council Member LaSala MOVED to approve a public arts selection process for the Canada del Oro Riverfront Park and the Oro Valley Development Services Center to include the following elements: 1) Execution of a contract with the Tucson/Pima Arts Council to administer the selection process, including issuance of the Call to Artists, mailing of informational packets to selected artists, and procedural arrangements for the Public Art Selection Committee (TPAC shall not be involved in the evaluation of artists); 2) Signing a Memorandum of Understanding with the Greater Oro Valley Arts Council to serve as a resource in the administration of the selection process; and 3) Utilize Community Development Staff to convene the Selection Committee and to provide meeting minutes. Council Member Parisi SECONDED the motion. 03/17/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 18 DISCUSSION: In answer to a question from Council Member Bryant, Dr. Chatfield reported that the cost of the contract with TPAC would be in the amount of up to $2,000 with some internal staff costs. _ Motion carried, 5 —0. 10. APPOINTMENT OF TOM VETRANO TO SERVE ON THE MUNICIPAL PROPERTY CORPORATION Town Manager Chuck Sweet reported that the Municipal Property Corporation(MPC) Board of Directors consists of three members. There is currently one vacancy on the Board which must be filled. He explained that it is anticipated that the MPC will be used in the coming months to provide financing for the O.V. #1 water system conversion/ improvements and the construction of the new Community Development Building. He stated that it is important that the MPC vacancy be filled. Mr. Sweet stated that Mr. Tom Vetrano has submitted an application of interest. In answer to questions from Council Member Bryant, Mr. Sweet explained that the function of the MPC is to provide a financing arm for large projects such as infrastructure improvements. He further explained that the MPC Board of Directors has three members and must be citizens of the community and serve specific terms of office. Mr. Sweet explained that the only time the Board has been used as a financing mechanism was in 1996 when the private water companies were purchased. He stated that when the MPC issues bonds, it does have tax exempt status. He stated that when the vacancy is filled, they would like to meet in a Study Session with the Council. Mr. Sweet also explained that there would not public voting on MPC financing but there would be public hearings held. MOTION: Vice Mayor Johnson MOVED to appoint Mr. Tom Vetrano to the Municipal Property Corporation Board of Directors with his term to expire in November, 2001. Council Member Parisi SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 4— 1, with Council Member Bryant opposed. TOWN MANAGER'S REPORT No report. ENGINEER'S REPORT No report. FINANCE DIRECTOR'S REPORT Town Manager Chuck Sweet announced that on Friday, March 19, the Department Heads would be submitting their 1999/2000 budgets to the Manager's Office. He stated that 03/17/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 19 after work is done balancing the budget requests, a draft would be submitted to the Council in early May. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S REPORT No report. POLICE CHIEF'S REPORT No report. WATER UTILITY DIRECTOR'S REPORT No report. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS Vice Mayor Johnson reported that the Solid Waste Study Task Force and Town staff have been working diligently and will be meeting with Council in a Study Session in April to present their findings. Council Member Parisi stated that he was proud of the Police Department's work in getting support for their initiative. He also reported that the Chamber of Commerce held a membership drive and signed up 58 new members. Council Member Parisi stated that on Monday, March 15th, the first meeting was held with the consultants and citizen volunteers for the Emergency Fire Strategic Plan. Pima Association of Governments (PAG) is working on getting more monies for roads in the area. Council Member Parisi, in a gesture of good faith and cooperation, offered Council Member Bryant and the Oro Valley Neighborhood Coalition a donation. CALL TO AUDIENCE Emily Anne Sleigh, 12417 N. Copper Queen Way, referenced Agenda Item#9 and stated that she is a local artist and did not receive a Call to Artists. She recommended that the process be explored and better organized. Allan Wright, 1005 W. Wilkenson, member of the Oro Valley Neighborhood Coalition, stated that they met with Mr. Charles Hulsey and others regarding the Stone Canyon II Preliminary Plat. He stated that they felt their input and comments were ignored but they wanted to try to continue to meet to address citizen concerns. Nancy Young Wright, 1005 W. Wilkenson, thanked Council for re-establishing two Call to Audience times. She stated that she would like to see Oro Valley move forward and mature politically. She asked that members of groups such as the Oro Valley Neighborhood Coalition not be used as a scapegoat but treated as other tax paying 03/17/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 20 citizens in the town. She stated that it was important to be sincere and that all groups are welcome at Town meetings. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Council Member LaSala MOVED to adjourn at 10:20 p.m. Vice Mayor Johnson SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 —0. Respectfully submitted, Roxana Garrity,Deputy Town Clerk I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the regular session of the Town of Oro Valley Council of Oro Valley, Arizona held on the 17th day of March, 1999. I further certify that the meeting was duly called and held and that a quorum was present. Dated this day of , 1999. Kathryn E. Cuvelier, CMC Item #7 Comments by Patty Est Neighborhood 11 Equestrian/Hiking Trail Realignment,OV Town Council, 3/17/99 Comments by Patty Estes, 11700 N. Joi Drive I support wholeheartedly an Oro Valley trail into Tortolita Mountain Park that originates in - Neighborhood 11. Oro Valley citizens would greatly benefit from the recreational opportunities associated with such a trail. However, with this new alignment, it is no longer an Oro Valley Trailhead and access to it cannot be controlled by Oro Valley, therefore,it's actual implementation remains in question. I recommend that the Public Trail alignment not be approved until the Council is sure that the following conditions have been met: 1. That the Town of Tortolita approves of the location of the trailhead and alignment, since it is located in their Town and it affects their citizen's and property owners. Even if you don't agree that Tortolita exists, you are moving the location of this facility to another jurisdiction. This is interesting planning on our part. We are exporting a problem for our developers and making it a problem for their residents and landowners.The citizen's of Oro Valley were supposed to have a trailhead within our Town limits, its seems that the developer has sucessfully argued that it just wouldn't fit in with his view of what Ono Valley needs. 2. The legal access to a trailhead staging area via roadways that are open to the public still needs to be worked out. It was my understanding that the access issue would have to be resolved before this trail alignment could beapproved. Access will require permission from property owners outside of the Town and will require upgrading of dirt roads outside of the Town. If there is no access, then there is no trail. 3.Who will be the legal owner of the staging area,the trail and the trail corridor?These must be owned by the public. If the Town becomes the owner, then who pays for the construction of the trail?Since the alignment has been drastically altered, who will pay for the added expense of the trail construction?If this detail has not been worked out between the Town, the developer and the County, then without money, there is no trail. 4. With the new alignment, Canada Aqua will have to be crossed near the northern boundary. A road crossing will also have to be upgraded to the trailhead south of Neighborhood 11. A trail realignment to locate the trail between the two western most washes in Neighborhood 11 would eliminate those two crossings. Was that possibility even explored? Advice on the location and construction of wash crossings was offered to the Town by Scott Richardson of Arizona Game and Fish. Has he been contacted? In summary, I enthusiatically support a trail into the Tortolita Mountain Park, but I feel that many important aspects still need to be finalized. 4; FT MINUTES ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL STUDY SESSION MARCH 24, 1999 ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11,000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE STUDY SESSION - AT OR AFTER 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Paul Loomis, Mayor Dick Johnson, Vice Mayor Wayne Bryant, Council Member Fran LaSala, Council Member EXCUSED: Paul Parisi, Council Member STAFF PRESENT: Chuck Sweet, Town Manager Jeff Grant, Human Resources Director Don Chatfield, Community Development Director Dan Dudley, Town Attorney Tobin Sidles, Prosecuting Attorney Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk COMPENSATION AND BENEFIT BUDGET DISCUSSION Jeff Grant, Human Resources Director explained that to insure that we remain competitive in the external labor market, HR has reviewed the Town salaries of selected communities throughout Arizona on an annual basis (using the League of Arizona Cites & Towns Local Government Salary and Benefit Survey). For job hierarchies that are not adequately represented in the League Survey, HR has utilized additional, topical survey data to provide clarifying data. He pointed out that most of his comments are directed at the non-police pay plan. He stated that two major problems with the existing 30-salary grade structure have emerged in the past few years. (1) With the growth in the Town's workforce, the natural development of additional levels within existing hierarchies has become necessary. (2) In addition, the salary range spread characteristic is too broad at the lower salary grades, artificially reducing the grade minimums below competitive levels. As a result, HR proposes to revise the salary structure from 30 to 75 grades beginning with the FY 1999- 2000 budget. The proposed structure reduces the range spread to 30% at the lowest grades, and expands to nearly 50% at the highest grades. This provides for more rapid growth within the range for job classifications with traditionally shorter learning curves, and much longer growth paths for those classifications with traditionally longer learning 03/24/99 Minutes, Council Study Session 2 curves. In addition, classifications in lower grades normally have far greater potential for job mobility. Mr. Grant stated that the revised 75-grade salary structure will give the Town of Oro _ Valley much more flexibility in dealing with both external and internal relationship issues for the future. He stated using COLA estimates from the U of A Economics Department and the recent Arizona Finance Officers Association Conference, HR advises using a July 1, 1999 COLA increase of 2.0%. In addition, based on data from the American Compensation Association, a continuation of the existing 4.0% merit grid is also recommended. Mr. Grant stated that pursuant to requests from the Town Council during the budget phase last year, HR has requested data from our broker, Lovitt and Touche, regarding feasibility of implementing a Flexible Benefits (Cafeteria) plan for employees during the 1999-2000 fiscal year. Discussion followed regarding the benefits of offering a Flexible Benefits (Cafeteria) plan to employees and the feasibility of starting with medical benefits. Vice Mayor Johnson stated the importance of being competitive with other cities and towns and would like to see the Town's compensation the top third in the state so we can hire the best employees for the town. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED, DESIGN GUIDELINES Don Chatfield, Community Development Director stated that in March 1998, a Technical Advisory Committee was appointed, and a planning consultant was approved by the Town Council. Dr. Chatfield explained that the design guidelines contain both text and graphics, covering standards for site planning, architecture, landscaping, and signage for both residential and commercial projects. The goal of the guidelines are intended to provide strong direction to developers, builders, owners, and designers, as well as staff and the Development Review Board (DRB). He stated that while the design guidelines are intended to be part of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised, they are descriptive, not prescriptive. Design principles offer a range of acceptable possibilities for developers. Steve Kellogg, Consultant with Cornoyer Hedrick gave a presentation of the proposed Design Guidelines. Mr. Kellogg explained that the purpose is 1) To ensure that the built environment is aesthetically pleasing and compatible with the natural surroundings. 2) To maintain the value of the Town's scenic and natural resources. 3) To promote the Town's quality of life. 4) To minimize disturbance to the natural environment. In answer to a question by Council Member Bryant, Dr. Chatfield stated that the Town Council can set a policy that they want to send a strong statement of what Oro Valley wants. This proposed package tries to encourage flexibility. 03/24/99 Minutes, Council Study Session 3 Mayor Loomis stated that this process received a lot of citizen input and he is glad to see a lot of it brought forward in this document. Mayor Loomis called a recess at 8:10 p.m. Meeting resumed at 8:20 p.m. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED CHAPTER 2, SECTION 2-101, DEFINITIONS AND CHAPTER 12, SIGNS Dr. Chatfield reviewed 5 highlights of the proposed amendments to the Sign Code. 1) New definitions are proposed for clarifying different types of commercial signage. 2) Deletion of the economic benefit exemption and Section 12-104, Comprehensive Sign Plan is proposed. The purpose of this sign plan is to provide for the establishment of signage criteria that will be tailored to a specific development or location, and may vary from specific ordinance provisions. The intent is to provide for more flexible sign criteria that will promote superior design through architectural integration of the site, buildings, and signs. 3) Kiosk identification signs have been moved from the permitted temporary section to the permitted permanent section of the sign code; Section 12-502M. 4) Entry-way signs have been separated into single-family and multi-family residential districts, Sections 12-601K and L. Entry-way signs identify, by project name, the entrance to a residential complex or subdivision. 5) Amending Section 12-601G, Custom Home Subdivision/Custom Builder Signs. These signs identify a custom home subdivision (Ri-20 and lower density) by name and the custom builders active within it. Council Member Johnson expressed concern with the economic impact on small businesses such as a"coffee cart" located outside of a shopping center that are not allowed to have signage. Discussion for possible solutions were discussed. Council Member LaSala asked that when a sign is submitted to the Council, that the applicant makes sure the true color is presented. He felt the Target sign colors look different than what was presented. Council Member Johnson stated colors can be used if they are tasteful. He expressed concern with every sign color being the same in the Town instead of having some variety. He stated color can be a positive instead of a negative, it depends on how it is done. Council Member LaSala asked that we explore the possibility of asking the applicant to select either their registered trademark symbol or text in the color they want. Mayor Loomis expressed concern with allowing unlimited colors and the overall impact on the environment. 03/24/99 Minutes, Council Study Session 4 After discussion regarding signage colors, Dr. Chatfield asked for direction He stated that until 1996 the sign code permitted the following colors: brown, beige, rust, sand or any metal color. (He stated that is where the copper patina came from). He stated that the Sign Code was amended over 3 years ago. The current code permits any color. He asked _ for parameters from the Council. Mayor Loomis suggested there will be further discussion regarding colors, at this point no changes should be made before it is brought forward to the Council. Council Member Bryant stated he would love to see the colors go back to the earth tones. He'd like to see us identify ourselves similar to Sedona or Park City, Utah, not only for signage, but for landscaping as well. He does not want us to be an extension of Oracle Road. In answer to some questions by Council Member Bryant, Dr. Chatfield explained the reason for the deletion of the Economic Benefit Exemption and how the Alternative Sign Package would address specific requests for signage. Mayor Loomis stated that Sign Code changes should be addressed before the Town Council instead of the Development Review Board (DRB) since they make recommendations to the Council and the Town Council gives final approval. In answer to a comment made by Mayor Loomis, specific criteria and examples of qualifying criteria should be listed in the Sign Code before an Alternative Sign Package would be considered. In answer to a comment made by Mayor Loomis, Dr. Chatfield clarified that a separate appeal process for DRB approval of regular signage would include the right of a citizen to appeal, as well as the applicant. Council Member Johnson stated that there should be a process developed to allow some latitude in the Sign Code to address unique situations that are needed on a temporary basis. Mayor Loomis suggested that the DRB should be included in the review cycle for signage with the Planning Commission regarding exemptions or changes allowed in the PAD. In response to a question by Council Member Bryant, Dr. Chatfield stated the amendments proposed were not intended to weaken the Code, but to make it simple to use while retaining the "teeth" of the Code. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED, COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS 03/24/99 Minutes, Council Study Session 5 Dr. Chatfield stated the purpose of the revisions were to make the categories more distinct and coordinated with the Economic Development Plan. Mayor Loomis requested that the Zoning Code be placed on the Town's Web Site as _ soon as possible. Dr. Chatfield stated a Technical Advisory Committee met over the time frame of 6 months. They looked at primarily C-N, C-1 and C-2 Districts. He explained that"retail categories" were listed instead of itemizing every retail use. Dr. Chatfield stated that the Planning & Zoning Commission recommended approval unanimously on February 2, 1999 and the Chamber has reviewed and submitted their comments. Council Member Johnson stated in preparation of the General Plan amendments we should consider what are appropriate commercial uses for the high volume corridors such as Oracle Road or Tangerine Road. He stated C-N uses should be used on other commercial corners that fit into neighborhood areas and not along the high volume corridors. Mayor Loomis commented that on page 5, add"or outdoor sales" except by special permit. He suggested that to encourage view shed, thoughts should be given to include a buffer requirement in commercial zones between side yards to get some space between some of the big commercial or office buildings. He stated that side yard buffer requirements should not be limited to single family zoning. He complimented staff for their work on this ordinance. In response to a question by Council Member Bryant, Dr. Chatfield reviewed the uses permitted subject to a conditional use permit, which includes convenience uses. Discussion followed regarding how"tent sales" at grocery stores should be addressed with a special use permit and allowing for some flexibility with"sidewalk sales," while maintaining some control. Council Member Johnson brought up a concern with smoke emitting from the Burger King Restaurant. Mayor Loomis stated that these restrictions should be addressed in "Restaurants" section of the Zoning Code. ADJOURNMENT Council Member LaSala MOVED to adjourn the study session at 9:20 p.m. Motion seconded by Council Member Johnson. MOTION carried 4—0. 03/24/99 Minutes, Council Study Session 6 Respectfully submitted, -�_ Kathryn E. Cuvelier, CMC Town Clerk /4„ ANi'�i J ‘ce% �. 4. flto ` h . 11000 N. La Canada Dr. ~' y { Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 x VERNER S.WOLFF,Chief of Police {° x y Phone (520) 742-5474 FAX (520) 797-2616 ti 114.1..;# . `"- UNDER ORO VALLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT "INTEGRITY, PRIDE, EXCELLENCE" MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Loomis and Town Council FROM: Chief Werner S. Wolff DATE: March 24, 1999 RE: Monthly Breakdown of Citations by Violation and Police Activity Summary Attached please find the updates for the month of February, 1999. Please note that some areas of the summary have changed. Due to a new computer system not all areas of the statistics will be broken down as before. WSW:nlr M [� 00 M N N ON N VD CN d' M N Q\ r.. O inN r--r OC CA e's �t O ,-. - — H O H U W Q O z H U O E.* 4 a W >.1 ,,, g , . . , , Em0 itt (.. itt , , , . . , , , Al PTI4 AV) W >0 CI) Em1 .4 O SO E.* >4AO Co)w W4 P4 *4 C.)**a itt .4 , A , , , i • C o 0. gg O , 4 . . 4 ON N O in r.-. in O\ QT [� r-r (V (r; , . r- N ON O N M C7,cc N r. !�' -- M N cam` ►-� W O w H I , , , * I . 1 , Q P. .D in N N --. r-. VD r-.. ON � in M 00 Q` p ,. 1n r-y M N N Vs' N 0kr) 00 N Tzt 00 dam' O Z CT N kr) 0t--- ►-, W CA P4 . , , W W H cA o U O N O0, .4 0 , N 74f5 64 V g c...; -0 vi — Cn y N •-. 4:1 rU , W rV6 UU U O ... N Eo . . U 4 '7;1 . 4 ,.= ti, g - c;,.) ,... 7, H r4 H H r4dui i H w - 0 P4 p. P4 4 Q\ O ,-.+ N N O t-- O CT N — t`-• C kr') t` kr) M N N r-- M �D r+ O — — "-4 H O H 0 w O Z 4 .--., 0 ~ H E.* c) 40C o 1-4 +' , , o . . b . E.., a* z ,,, w w = ' . 4 . . , , _g 4� E-0 cA • o 0.1 1-1 ,w4 viA 4' o E.* H w < C. imMill 'Cj m , a I IMME ....1 .4 Pi 00 0 O N ao 4 _...._ w...1 . , i ,____›. H wo H 5a5 ,._,....._ . 4 4 _ ..t a4 0, w o g _ 4 , , , g = o ..i 0.4 : _....._ , , , , _____ Hi O tr, tO �, O M M N , wo r--- r--- kr) .-- N 4 O 4. M O O r-, t-- O N O .0 '.O .1' 00 M M N in Z00 00 .-- •--. c,1 r-. en 1 1 2 G 0 E--. c. aN w w 0 > 4o\c` ;' u w ',1 • .,i-, w o c g E--, c2 Q w H. 0 ,,,.� ,,- c: z o M :4,:-.. �c. � o �4 w' c,z � .4 ,n, o ,n, , E.., 0 ,-.. < Cil p. 4 ph) a--;° w ›-, > w W f . c. 8 a z ,- '-' o H o = w a P., w C' Vt O H H rn w 0 w Q Q = w cA , v) cn 0 44 a. C TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: April 7,1999 To: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: William A. Jansen, P.E. Town Engineer SUBJECT: Resolution (R) 99-37 Authorizing the Town to contract with Agra Infrastructure,Inc. to prepare plans and specifications for the installation of three traffic signals within the Town limits. BACKGROUND: The Town has received A "Traffic Signal Warrants Analysis and Signal Installation Study" prepared by Curtis Lueck & Associates. This study examined various intersections within the Town to determine what intersections warranted traffic signals at this time. This study concluded that traffic signals are warranted at the following intersections: La Canada Drive/Naranja Drive; First Avenue/Lambert Lane; and Tangerine Road/First Avenue. The proposed contract with Agra Infrastructure Inc. is to prepare the plans and specifications for the installation of the above traffic signals. Funding for these traffic signal installations is in the 1998/99 Town Wide Roadway Development Impact Fees Capital Budget. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution(R) 99- 37 Consultant's Scope of Work FISCAL IMPACT: The project cost is estimated to be$36,000.00. Funds are available in the Town Wide Roadway Development Impact Fees Fund. .RECOMMENDATION OF STAFF: The staff of the Department of Public Works recommends the approval of the contract. SUGGESTED MOTION: The Town Council may wish to consider the following motion: I move to approve Resolution (R) 99- 37 authorizing the Town to contract with Agra Infrastructure, Inc. to prepare plans and specifications for the installation of traffic signals at the following intersections: La Canada Drive/Naranja Drive; First Avenue/Lambert Lane; and Tangerine Road/First Avenue. OR I move to not approve Resolution(R)99- 37 . 4 ^)s.-V---- — T• Engin- i ,/` ../ //J. ,// own M. ager P.O. NO. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION WORK ORDER SCOPE OF WORK NARANJA DRIVE/LA CANADA FIRST AVENUE/LAMBERT LANE FIRST AVENUE/TANGERINE TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS March 10, 1999 WORK ORDER SCOPE OF WORK NARANJA DRIVE/LA CANADA FIRST AVENUE/LAMBERT LANE FIRST AVENUE/TANGERINE TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS INDEX DESCRIPTION PAGE WORK ORDER SCOPE OF WORK 1 SCHEDULE 3 FEE PROPOSAL 4 - 12 i 100 GENERAL 110 Location The traffic signal project, Naranja Drive / La Canada, First Avenue / Lambert Lane, and First Avenue / Tangerine is located in the Town of Oro Valley in various sections of Pima County, Arizona. The project limits include the intersections, the adjacent right-of-way, and the approach roadways to the intersections within the immediate vicinity in each direction. It may be necessary to collect data beyond these limits to provide alignment tie-ins, configure lanes and complete the plans. 120 Description This is a Traffic Signal Improvement Project. Its goals are to add traffic signals to select unsignalized intersections per the "Traffic Signal Warrants Analysis and Signal Installation Planning Study", January, 1999, prepared by CLA. Also included in the project are curb returns at the various intersections and the addition of minor geometric improvements to facilitate lane alignment and vehicular turning movements. The existing pavement will remain, the improvements will entail signals, striping, curb and widening only. Utility relocations are not anticipated. The work on this project includes the following: A. Research existing utility, as-built and right-of-way data. B. Perform a topo survey of the project. C. Develop base sheets to indicate existing conditions. D. Prepare plans, specs and estimates to: 1. Accomodate future improvements at Tangerine/ 1st Avenue. 2. Install curb returns and minor geometric improvements at the three subject intersections. 3. Install Traffic Signals at the three subject intersections. 4. Provide striping and traffic control plans. 5. Provide appropriate typical sections and indicate grading for drainage, access and utility requirements. E. Since this is a minor project consisting of traffic signal improvements to already disturbed areas (based on field observations of the project limits), no environmental study is anticipated. F. Provide Initial and Final documents for review and distribution. 130 Purpose The purpose of this project is to improve the safety and traffic operations of the Naranja Drive / La Canada, First Avenue / Lambert Lane, and First Avenue / Tangerine intersections. 140 Construction Cost The Consultant shall provide cost estimates commensurate with the level of detail for the project plans. Construction cost is estimated at $360,000. 160 Length of Services The length of service shall be 120 calendar days from the notice to proceed, including all reviews. AGRA INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT NAME: TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS THREE INTERSECTIONS DERIVATION OF COST PROPOSAL SUMMARY (round Figures to the Nearest $1.00) ESTIMATED DIRECT LABOR ESTIMATED AVG. HOURLY LABOR CLASSIFICATION MAN-HOURS RATE COSTS PROJECT MANAGER 7 $90.00 $630 PROJECT ENGINEER 78 $77.00 $6,006 ENGINEER/ DESIGNER 44 $68.00 $2,992 TECHNICIAN / DESIGNER 28 $55.00 $1,540 CADD TECHNICIAN 168 $50.00 $8,400 2-MAN SURVEY CREW 72 $90.00 $6,480 CLERICAL 16 $34.00 $544 TOTAL PERSON-HOURS 413 SUB-TOTAL DIRECT LABOR $20,112 ESTIMATED DIRECT EXPENSES ACTUAL COST (Listed by item at Estimated Actual Cost- NO MARKUP) VHS TAPE 1 EACH $6.00 $6 XEROX (B&W)81/2x11 4000 EACH $0.05 $200 XEROX (B&W) 11x17 1000 EACH $0.15 $150 VELLUM PLOTS 30 EACH $8.00 $240 BLUELINES 200 EACH $1.00 $200 SUB-TOTAL ESTIMATED EXPENSES $796 ESTIMATED OUTSIDE SERVICES COST Mars Burnside Associates, Inc. $14,800 SUB-TOTAL ESTIMATED OUTSIDE SERVICES $14,800 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $35,708 I 1 10-Mar-99 Signature Date TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: April 7, 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk SUBJECT: Proclamation— SAFE KIDS Week SUMMARY: The attached proclamation declares the week of May 1 - 8, 1999 as Town of Oro Valley Safe Kids Week and encourages all town residents to buckle up and recognize that injuries are not accidents and to participate and plan activities during SAFE KIDS week. SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to Proclaim the week of May 1 —8, 1999 as SAFE KIDS Week. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Proclamation Letter from Arizona Department of Health Services (4-1-4-4- - Kathryn uvelier, Town Clerk Chuck Swe0/7A411 , n Manager 0 oidte diart Ora paltry Arizima ‘n) t*" 111. WHEREAS, thirty-two percent of deaths to Arizona's children ages 1-19 could have been prevented through the use of common safety practices such as use of seat belt, locked storage of guns, secure pool fences, smoke detectors, bicycle helmets and other safety precautions, including closer parental supervision; and WE7EAS, the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona supports the Arizona SAFE KIDS Coalition mission to enhance the safety of children and youth throughout Arizona, as well as the communities in which they live,by conduction,promoting,and enhancing injury prevention activities; and WHEREAS, the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona will partner with the Arizona SAFE KIDS Coalition in promoting childhood injury prevention by uniting diverse groups into local coalition, developing innovative educational tools and strategies, initiating public policy changes, promoting new technology and raising awareness through education and the media. NOW, THE1 EFORE, I, Paul H. Loomis,Mayor of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, do hereby proclaim May 1st through May 8th, 1999 as SAFE KIDS WEEK May 1-8, 1999 and encourage all Town residents to buckle up and recognize that injuries are not accidents and to participate and plan activities during SAFE KIDS Week. Paul H. Loomis,Mayor ATTEST: -- Kathryn Cuvelier,Town Clerk Bureau of Community and Family Health Services �,�,,.( Office of Prevention and Health Promotion Arizona i Department of Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention Program Health Services 2700 North 3rd Street, Suite # 4050 JANE DEE HULL,GOVERNOR Phoenix, Arizona 85004 JAMES R. ALLEN,MD,MPH,DIRECTOR (602) 542-1222 (602) 542-7520 FAX March 5, 1999 The Honorable Paul Loomis Mayor of Oro Valley 11000 North La Canada Drive Oro Valley, Arizona 85737-7015 Dear Honorable Paul Loomis: The National SAFEKIDS Campaign has announced that National SAFE KIDS Week will be celebrated the week of May 1 through May 8, 1999. As in years past,the Arizona Department of Health Services Office of Prevention and Health Promotion, in partnership with the Arizona SAFE KIDS Coalition,the Governor's Office of Community and Highway Safety and the Governor's Office of Community and Family Programs is planning a series of events focused at increasing awareness and education related to childhood injuries. The first event will focus on educating members of the legislature on the prevalence of childhood injuries, cost of injuries to Arizona's taxpayers, and how public policy can have a positive impact on the lives of children statewide. As part of this process,we will set up a festive proclamation display at the State Capitol Foyer that will include a proclamation from Governor Jane D.Hull and proclamations received from Mayors and Tribal Chairmen. Enclosed is a draft proclamation that you may want to consider in developing your own. Please return your proclamation to me no later than April 16, 1999. Upon receipt, I will have it framed and will include it in our display. Doris Evans-Gates, M.S., C.H.E.S. State Coordinator Arizona SAFE KIDS Coalition 2700 North 24th Street Phoenix, Arizona 85004 Thank you for your participation. Please call me at 602-542-1222 if you have any questions or if I can be of any assistance. Sincerely, ao.A.Lio Utult11". Doris Evans-Gates, State Coordinator Arizona SAFE KIDS Coalition Leadership for a Healthy Arizona TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: APRIL 7, 1999 ti. TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: Werner S. Wolff, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Resolution No. 99-38 authorizing the Oro Valley Police Department to apply to the Governor's Office of Community and Highway Safety for funds to purchase a DUI Enforcement Vehicle and an Aggressive Drive Enforcement Vehicle to further public safety within the boundaries of the Town of Oro Valley. SUMMARY: Funds will become available through the Governor's Office of Highway Safety in conjunction with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) under the State of Arizona's 2000 Highway Safety Plan. All governmental agencies are encouraged to take an active part in the Arizona Highway Safety program and as such the Oro Valley Police Department wishes to apply for these funds. Funds if approved will be received after 1 October 1999(The start of the Federal Fiscal Year). This request is for permission from the Council to apply for funding in the amount of$75,000.00 and is no guarantee that funding will be approved. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Copy of Governor's Office of Community and Highway Safety letter requesting proposals for this grant. 2. Resolution No.99-38 FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact to the Town of Oro Valley for FY 98/99 or FY 99/00. RECOMMENDATION: I recommend Mayor and Council grant a resolution permitting the Police Department to apply for funding from the Governor's Office of Community and Highway Safety in the amount of$75,000.00 for a DUI Enforcement Vehicle, and an Aggressive Driver Enforcement Vehicle both equipped with mobile vision camera and radar systems. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move that Resolution No. 99-38 be adopted. .9 , . r -r S. Wolff, 1 ief of Polic / / .i Y / 1 ' ' 4 Charles F. Sw--t, Town Manager oxce of f. °4 c.., ‘•,., 414 ,z. . -. - -. , cf) ' �: JANE DEE HULL ALBERTO GUTIER ARIZ()NIk ( Governor Director Governor's Highway Safety Representative --- February 1, 1999 Chief Werner Wolff Oro Valley Police Department 11000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley, AZ 85737 Chief Wolff: The Governor's Office of Highway Safety (GOHS) is requesting from state, county and local jurisdictions, submission of proposals relating to all aspects of highway safety for the 2000 Federal Fiscal Year. All projects are funded in the form of reimbursable grants from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and the Federal Highway Administration A). Some of the highway safety issues that will be addressed are: Occupant Protection, Youth Alcohol, Emergency Medical Services, Police Traffic Services, Traffic Records, Impaired Driving, Accident Investigation, Motorcycle, Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety and Rural Highway Safety. Highway safety-related training in all disciplines will also be considered. As has been the case in previous years, we anticipate the total dollar amount of the proposals to exceed the federal funds which we will receive. We cannot guarantee all proposals will be funded, however, all proposals received will be reviewed and given full consideration. The most important areas we will evaluate are problem identification, analysis of prior highway safety program performance and compliance with the quarterly i report requirements. Enclosed is a proposal guide for your review. If you or your staff have any questions regarding developing your project, please contact a GOHS Grant Manager at -- (602) 255-3216. If your agency would like to participate, a proposal must be submitted to us no later than April 1, 1999. Sincerely, 1 t% t \ •. . Alberto Gutier Director 3030 North Central Avenue, Suite 1550, Phoenix, Arizona 85012 Telephone (602)255-3216 Fax (602)255-1265 RESOLUTION NO. 99-38 A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF GRANT APPLICATION BY THE ORO VALLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT TO THE GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF COMMUNITY AND HIGHWAY SAFETY FOR FUNDING OF A DUI ENFORCEMENT VEHICLE AND AN AGGRESSIVE DRIVER ENFORCEMENT VEHICLE BOTH EQUIPPED WITH MOBILE VISION CAMERA AND RADAR UNITS TOTALING $75,000.00. WHEREAS, the Governor's Office of Community and Highway Safety is accepting grant applications for funds in the form of reimbursable grants from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA); and WHEREAS, it is in the interest of the Town of Oro Valley to apply for and receive grant funding purposes for the of furthering public safety within the boundaries of the Town of Oro Valley. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA: 1. That the grant application requesting funding from the Governor's Office of Community and Highway Safety is hereby approved. 2. That the Mayor, Chief of Police and other officials are hereby authorized to execute and complete the grant application documents on behalf of the Town of Oro Valley. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, this 7TH day of APRIL , 1999. Paul H. Loomis, Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Tobin Sidles, Town Attorney TOWN OF ORO VALLEY ;OUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: April 7, 1999 HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: David L. Andrews, Finance Director SUBJECT: Resolution No. (R)99- 39 Designating Officers to Declare Official Intent on Behalf of the Town with Respect to Reimbursement from Proceeds of Tax-Exempt Bonds Pursuant to Treasury Regulations Section 1.150-2 SUMMARY: As you are probably aware, action is underway to transfer operation of the Oro Valley Water Improvement District(OVWID) from the Metropolitan Domestic Water Improvement District (MDWID) to the Oro Valley Water Utility. Activities with regard to the new development services building are also underway. It is the intention of the Town to finance the costs of these two projects with Municipal Property Corporation bonds. At this time, it is anticipated that the bonds will be sold in June, 1999. However, because some costs such as architectural, engineering, and water system interconnection improvements must be incurred prior to June, it is necessary for the Town to approve the attached reimbursement resolution. Council approval of the resolution will allow the Town to reimburse its General Fund and Water Utility Enterprise Fund for those costs as mentioned from the bond proceeds that will be available when the bonds are sold. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. (R)99- 39 Designating Officers to Declare Official Intent on Behalf of the Town with Respect to Reimbursement from Proceeds of Tax-Exempt Bonds Pursuant to Treasury Regulations Section 1.150-2 2. Letter from Gust Rosenfeld, Bond Counsel 3. Blank Reimbursement Form RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the resolution. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION PAGE 2 OF 2 SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. (R)99-39 Designating Officers to Declare Official Intent on Behalf of the Town with Respect to Reimbursement from Proceeds of Tax-Exempt Bonds Pursuant to Treasury Regulations Section 1.150-2. or I move to deny Resolution No. (R)99- 39 Designating Officers to Declare Official Intent on Behalf of the Town with Respect to Reimbursement from Proceeds of Tax-Exempt Bonds Pursuant to Treasury Regulations Section 1.150-2. n . 7 ,_ ,) ._,z/„!,,_,J24,/ �- David L. Andrews Finance Director ,. al i 4 Chuck Swe- Town Manager RESOLUTION NO. (R)99-39 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, DESIGNATING OFFICERS TO DECLARE OFFICIAL INTENT ON BEHALF OF THE TOWN WITH RESPECT TO REIMBURSEMENT FROM PROCEEDS OF TAX-EXEMPT BONDS PURSUANT TO TREASURY REGULATIONS SECTION 1.150-2 WHEREAS, The Town of Oro Valley, Arizona ("Town"), may from time to time make expenditures with the intent that such expenditures will be reimbursed from the proceeds of tax-exempt bonds (the "Reimbursement Bonds") and; WHEREAS, in order to treat such reimbursement as an expenditure of proceeds of the Reimbursement Bonds for the purpose of applying Section 103 and 141 through 150 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, the Town may be required, pursuant to Treasury Regulation Section 1.150-2, to declare its intention to reimburse an expenditure with proceeds of a Reimbursement Bond; and WHEREAS, such declaration of intention to reimburse and expenditure must be made no later than sixty (60) days after the payment of such expenditure; and WHEREAS, the Town may designate an officer or officers to declare such official intent on its behalf; and WHEREAS, appropriate officers of the Town to make such declaration on behalf of the Town are the Town's Manager or Finance Director; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY THAT: Section 1 The Town's Manager and the Town's Finance Director are each hereby designated, for the purposes of the Treasury Regulation Section 1.150-2, to declare the official intent of the Town to reimburse an expenditure with the proceeds of a Reimbursement Bond. Such declarations of intent shall be in writing signed by one of the designated officers and shall comply with the provisions of the Treasury Regulation Section 1.150-2 and shall be effective when executed. Section 2 The Town's Finance Director shall, upon the issuance of Reimbursement Bonds, cause a written allocation to be made that evidences the Town's use of proceeds of the Reimbursement Bond to reimburse a prior expenditure. Section 3 The Town's Finance Director shall not permit proceeds of a Reimbursement Bond to be used to reimburse a prior expenditure unless such reimbursement is made within the reimbursement time period set forth in Treasury Regulation Section 1.150-2 or unless the requirements of such section are otherwise satisfied. Section 4 The Town's Manager and the Town's Finance Director are authorized to take any other appropriate actions which are necessary to meet the requirements of Treasury Regulation Section 1.150-2. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this 7TH day of APRIL , 1999. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA Paul H. Loomis, Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn E. Cuvelier, CMC, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Tobin C. Sidles, Town Attorney GUT O 201 N.CENTRAL AVE.,SUITE 3300 ONE S.CHURCH AVE.,SUITE 800 1Ei\JFEL]J PL.c. PHOENIX,ARIZONA 85073-3300 TUCSON,ARIZONA 85701-1620 TELEPHONE (602)257-7422 TELEPHONE (520)628-7070 Attorneys Since 1 9 2 1 FACSIMILE (602)254-4878 FACSIMILE (520)624-3849 - REPLY TO THE PHOENIX OFFICE SCOTT W.RUBY www.gustlaw.com (602)257-7432 FAX: (602)340-1538 swruby@gustlaw.com February 26, 1999 Mr. David Andrews Finance Director Town of Oro Valley 11000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley, Arizona 85737-7015 Dear David: Enclosed is a copy of the Reimbursement Resolution which should be adopted by the Council. The Resolution designates you or Chuck to fill out the form which is also attached to the Resolution. The first form for the improvement district transaction has been filled out for your convenience. Any subsequent reimbursement can be documented by completing a similar form(a blank is also attached) for that particular reimbursement. If you have any questions or comments,please give me a call. Very truly yours, 674(2--- Scott W. Ruby For the Firm SWR:jmd 022699 Enclosures DECLARATION OF OFFICIAL INTENT UNDER TREA- SURY REGULATION SECTION 1.150-2 TO REIMBURSE AN EXPENDITURE WITH PROCEEDS OF TAX-EXEMPT BONDS The undersigned is either the Town Manager or the Town Finance Director for the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona(the "Town"), and has been designated by the Mayor and Council of the Town to declare official intent on behalf of the Town with respect to the reimbursement of expenditures with proceeds of tax-exempt bonds. Section 1. Declaration of Official Intent. The undersigned hereby declares under Treasury Regulation Section 1.150-2 the official intent of the Town to reimburse the following capital expenditures with the proceeds of tax-exempt bonds. Date of Description Payment of the Amount of of Expenditure Expenditure Expenditure $ Section 2. Timeliness of Declaration. This declaration is being made not later than sixty(60) days after payment of the expenditure(s)to be reimbursed. Section 3. Project Description. (Instructions: Generally describe the project for which the expenditure is paid. A project includes any property, project or program (e.g. highway capital improvement program, hospital equipment acquisition, or school building renovation). A project description is sufficient if it identifies, by name and functional purpose, the fund or account from which the original expenditure is paid (e.g. parks and recreation fund -- recreational facility capital improvement program)). SWR:joy 296969.01 2/26/99 Section 4. Maximum Principal Amount. The maximum principal amount of obligations expected to be issued for the project described in Section 3 above is $ Section 5. Reasonable Expectation to Reimburse. This Declaration as of its date is consistent with the budgetary and financial circumstances of the Town and the Town reasonably expects to reimburse the expenditures described in Section 1 with proceeds of tax- exempt bonds. Dated: Its Town of Oro Valley,Arizona S W R:j oy 296969.01 2/26/99 -2- TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: April 7, 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL FROM: Don Manspeaker, Civil Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Resolution (R) 99-40 Award of contract for Project No. 318-310-903.319 Tangerine Road / La Canada Left Turn Bay SUMMARY: This project involves the construction of a left turn bay at the intersection of Tangerine Road and La Canada Drive. This will include widening Tangerine Road to accommodate the turn bay, restriping Tangerine Road within the project limits and other incidental work. These improvements will improve the safety of the intersection. In response to the advertisement for bids the Town received five bid proposals. The bidro osals were opened by Town staff at 2:00 p.m. on Monday March 12th, 1999. p p The following is a summary of the bids received along with the engineer's estimate: 1 NAC Construction $39,098.50 2 Pima Paving $45,296.18 3 Dar-Hil Corp. $49,609.00 4 Southern Arizona Paving $53,483.25 5 A&S Paving $57,790.00 Engineers estimate $54,452.33 ATTACHMENTS: Resolution (R) 99 - 40 FISCAL IMPACT: Funding for this project is available from budgeted Town funds for the 98/99 fiscal year. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 2 RECOMMENDATIONS: 1 . Award the Contract to NAC Construction, the lowest responsible bidder, in the amount of $39,098.50. 2 . Direct the Town Engineer to prepare a Notice of Award To NAC Construction, and transmit said Notice along with the Contract Agreement and bond forms for execution. 3 . Direct the Town Engineer to issue the Notice to Proceed in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Agreement upon receipt of the executed Contract Agreement. 4 . Authorize the Town Engineer to execute Contract Change Orders and/or Supplemental Agreements incidental to the prosecution of work. 5 . Direct the Town Clerk to hold the bid bonds from all bidders until such time that a Contract Agreement has been executed. SUGGESTED MOTION: The Council may wish to consider one of the following motions: I move to approve Resolution (R) 99-40 subject to the Town Engineers recommendations OR I move to deny Resolution (R) 99-40 William A. Jans=n, P. Ike wn Engineer "I' t` - - �I Chuck Sweet, Town Manager RESOLUTION NO. (R) 99-40 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, AWARDING A CONTRACT TO CONSTRUCT A LEFT TURN BAY AT THE INTERSECTION OF TANGERINE ROAD AND LA CANADA DRIVE TO NAC CONSTRUCTION WHEREAS, the construction of roadway improvements within the Towns Right of Way is necessary to the publics health, safety, and welfare in order to provide for the safe and effective movement of vehicular and pedestrian traffic, and WHEREAS, the Town Council deems it necessary in the interest of providing for the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Oro Valley to authorize the Towns staff to contract with NAC Construction to construct a left turn bay at the intersection of Tangerine Road and La Canada Drive. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE MAYOR AND THE TOWNCOUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA: That Town staff is authorized to contract with NAC Construction to construct a left turn bay at the intersection of Tangerine Road and La Canada Drive PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this 7TH day of APRIL , 1999. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA Paul H. Loomis, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Kathryn E. Cuvelier, Town Clerk Tobin Sidles, Town Attorney Date Date TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: April 7th, 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: David Marsh, Planner I SUBJECT: OV13-97-68 SUNSET RIDGE AT RANCHO VISTOSO II (AKA VILLA), RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 10, PARCEL M, ENTRY MONUMENT, LOCATED WEST OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD, AND NORTH OF MOORE ROAD BACKGROUND: The final plat for Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 11, Parcel M was approved by Town Council on March 1st, ' 98 single familyresidential lots and common areas. Parcel M is 1995, and occupies 47.78 acres subdivided into g surrounded by Moore Road to the south, Sunset Ridge I to the east, and undeveloped landis found to the west submitted for approval of the entry monument and landscaping at the and north. A landscape plan has now been corner of Moore Road and Eagle View Drive. SUMMARY: • entrywall arrangement set back from the street at the project's ,:he applicant has proposed a U shaped g principle entrance off of Moore Road. The entrymonument will consist of a 4' stucco wall with a veneer rock area, consisting base and 5' rock wall trim. A landscape of Chilean Mesquite, Sweet Acacia, Yucca and • way. A colour palette has been proposed for the entry monumentation, Ocotillo, will be provided along the entry y Beige" Stucco, and is consistent with other entry monuments in the Rancho "Vistoso Rock" stone and "Stone B g Vistoso PAD. } DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD ACTION: - recommend approval of the entryway/landscape plan. On March 9 , 1999, the DRB voted 6 0 to pp GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE: ent monumentation against the General Plan policies and finds the project Staff has evaluated the landscape plan/entry g usin earth tone colors and masonry/tile materials and using native to be in conformance with Policy 9.1A, g materials and colors predominant in the surrounding natural landscape. RECOMMENDATIONS: with the condition that the signage recommends approval, shall be reviewed via separate permit. SUGGESTED MOTION: Rancho Vistoso� II (aka Maravilla), �Rancho Vistoso I move to approve OV 13-97-68 Sunset Ridge at pp Neighborhood 10,Parcel M,Entry Monument. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENTS: 1 Reduced Copy of Entryway/Landscape Plan L.i P ., in % Zoning Administrator 11 1i 4 °�' 1 1. It dii.:60,ei A 1 Community D: 1 •pme 1 irecto 40 . / 4 Town Mana:er F:\OV\OV 13\1997\13-97-68\GatesTC.doc TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: April 7, 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL FROM: Shirley Gay, Assurance Clerk between DMI SUBJECT: Amended Assurance AgreementTangerine, LLC and First American Title Insurance as Trustee of OV12-95-02 Coyote Ridge Lots 1-109 SUMMARY: DMI Tangerine, LLC has requested approval of a Substitute Assurance Agreement for OV 12-95-02 Coyote g askin for an extension as the assurance agreement has expired. Ridge lots 1 thru 109. DMI Tangerine LLC is RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff has no objections to this request. SUGGESTED MOTION: The Town Council may wish to consider one of the following motions: move to approve OV 12-95-02 Coyote Ridge Lots 1 thru 109 Amended Assurance Agreement OR I move to deny OV 1 2-95-02 Coyoteb Ride Lots 1 thru 109 Assurance Assurance Agreement. ATTACHMENTS: Amended Assurance Agreement pl, , - _ ; d o g • ' 'strator ,, 1 ` 1 s. r o rirff ty D:'opment h irector / 14Wr own Man. :er F:\INDIVID\SAG\Tccrel.doc Subdivision COYOTE RIDGE Lots 1 thru 109 LESS ANY LOTS PREVIOUSLY - OV 12-95-2 RELEASED FROM ASSURANCES TOWN OF ORO VALLEY AMENDMENT OF ASSURANCE AGREEMENT FOR COMPLETION OF SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS • THIS AMENDED AGREEMENT made and entered into this day of MARCH , 19 99 , between DMI TANGERINE, L.L.C . an Arizona limited liability companyBeneficiary under Trust No. 4616 (referrpd to in this Agreement as "Subdivider") ; FIRST AMERICAN TITLE IN RUANCE COMPANY, a California corporation As Trustee under Trust No. 4 616 (referred to in this Agreement as "Trustee") and Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, (referred to in this Agreement as "Town") . WHEREAS, the parties have entered into an Assurance Agreement dated August 15 , 19 96 , recorded in Docket 10408 , at Page(s) 1531 in the office of the Pima County Recorder and, WHEREAS, conclusion of improvements is not possible within the time stated in that agreement due to the following circumstances: improvements have not been completed • and WHEREAS, the parties desire to extend the time for completion; THE PARTIES agree as follows: 1. That based upon the above specified conditions, good cause for extending the assurances has been demonstrated. [2. Note: Complete depending upon which circumstances are applicable to the request: ] [a. THE time for completion stated in Section 2. 07 of the agreement described above shall be extended to gf,pt ember 30th, 19 99 . [b. PURSUANT to the Oro Valley Town Zoning Code the parties are requesting substitution of assurances to the following plrties, who are the property owners ' 1 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA Mayor ATTEST: . Town Clerk SEE ATTACHED FOR TRUSTEE SIGNATURE AND NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGE- MENT APPROVED AS TO FORM: Town Attorney SUBDIVIDER: DMI TANGERINE, L.L.C . , an Arizona limited liability company NanaDgieapon•_ V: 't es Inc. , an rizona Corp. , By• its : STATE OF ARIZONA ) ) ss . County of Pima ) On (Y16A-a\i t1, t?" , befor e,Ite undersi ned NotarY --- - Public, personally appeared 4�- dui , personally known to me (or proven to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person (s) whose name (s) is/mow subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/samhey executed the same in his/ ..__edi-r authorized capacity(ies) , and that by his/her/their signature (s) on the instrument the person (s) or the entity upon behalf of which the person (s) acted, executed the instrument . WITNESS my hand and official seal . --- OFFICIAL S r`�.:-��%� Y ►Gid. • L _.,_ �'� ,,,�_ .� isle e- i Vill*:** !_ •..._ • • f .::►1.-r e Y&.--g9 Not ub l i V.; my Corncniar RIces h Nittk•ii-f;. junp. :1*.P.' ,,,.,„-'' A 4 ., . - TRUSTEE: FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation, - :-r Trust 4616 as Trustee only and no ' nis corporate capacity and no -....447 s4inall 4-/ r' by: ,/ -.�-' its :Briitte Echave, Ass' t Vice President STATE OF ARIZONA ) ) ss . County of Pima ) On March LSI 1999, before me, the undersigned NotaryPublic, personally appeared Brigitte Echave, personally known to me (or proven to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person (s) whose name (s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies) , and that by his/her/their signature (s) on the instrument the person (s) or the entity upon behalf of which the person (s) acted, executed the instrument . WITNESS my hand and official seal . r) -fill A a A;my fb,,,.44 s dir.-+.- , tAL SAL" ? , e,,,CAL-- on .Mctm (iLl'7;AP, ,. . •ic-Arizona ,i Notary Public • Pima County 11 �``�� � Commission Ex es 12/27/02 ? My p t..^�-.-�^�.--�--- -._�-•.^,`-.. rte...-`-�--.—...- TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMUNICATION MEETING DATE: April 7, 1999 • TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Froy Cota, P.E., Interim Project Manager SUBJECT: Notice of Completion Project No. W07-0798 Town of Oro Valley Water Utility Water Main Extension (2700 Zone) BACKGROUND: ofOro ValleyWater Utilitystaff distributed total of 15 sets of contract plans and specifications to The Town local contractor's and reference agencies. Seven (7) bid proposals were received for this project. Bids were the Town Clerk at 4:00 p.m. on July 29, 1998. The following is a summary of the bids that were opened by received: 1. NAC Construction S148,838.00 2. Southern Arizona Paving $126,970.00 3. Tricon Contracting $143,396.00 4. KE&G Development $180,856.00 Dar-Hill Corporation $168,204.00 6. Pima Pipeline $135,124.00 7. Miura Construction, Inc. S166,986.00 The bid proposal was accepted ro osal and awarded to Southern Arizona Paving and Construction on August 19, 1998 in the amount of$126,970.00 at the regular Town Council meeting. SUMMARY: A. The above-described work was completed in general conformance with the plans and specifications. The work has been inspected by the Town staff and is recommended for acceptance. B. The initial contract award amount was $126,970.00. Seven change orders were issued for the project and theyare summarized in a letter from WestLand Resources, Inc. (Attachment A). The total contract amount to complete the project, including the change orders and reduction in bid quantities, was $156,289.25. C. After the Notice of Completion is recorded, the Town will release the final five (5) percent of the contract retention to the Contractor. ATTACHMENTS: A. Change Order Summary from WestLand Resources, Inc. B. Change Order Summary from Arizona-Paving and Construction Company C. Notice of Completion TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMUNICATION Page 2 of 2 RECOMMENDATIONS: lk: Accept the work constructed by Southern Arizona Paving and Construction for Project No. W07-0798 entitled"Town of Oro Valley Water Utility Water Main Extension(2700 Zone). B. Authorize the Mayor to sign the Notice of Completion. C. Direct the Town Clerk to record said Notice of Completion within ten (10) days of the Town Council's action at the Office of the County Recorder, Pima County. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to accept the work constructed by Southern Arizona Paving and Construction for Project No. W07-0798 subject to the Town of Oro Valley Water Utility Director's recommendation. Or I move to deny 4 .4-(1 aitt( tA+L-k- xG Wa -r Utility Dir'• •r / , 1 , /4 own Mana:er WestLand Resources, In c. Engineering and Environmental Consultants March 29, 1999 ATTACHMENT A Mr. David Hook,P.E. Utility Administrator TOWN OF ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY 1565 E. Rancho Vistoso Boulevard, Suite A Oro Valley,Arizona 85737 RE: CHANGE ORDER FOR SOUTHERN ARIZONA PAVING PROJECT NO.W07-0798 WESTLAND JOB NO.206.03 Dear Mr. Hook: The following letter is a summary of all of the change orders submitted by Southern Arizona Paving and Construction Company for Project No. W07-0798, Town of Oro Valley Water Utility Water Main Extension (2700 Zone). The following change order items are listed in the order that they were received from Southern Arizona Paving. Item 1. Over the course of construction, the Town of Oro Valley field staff requested, due to the field conditions, the classification of the ductile iron pipe be changed from Class 350 to Class 52. The Contractor submitted his price of$4.10 per lineal foot for the Class 52 ductile iron pipe. The total amount for the change order to change to a higher quality of ductile iron pipe was $963.50. Item 2. The plans provided by Cella Barr Associates show the existing fiber optic locations based upon design bluestake. After the existing utility locations were potholed and field verified, the existing fiber optic lines were too close to the proposed water main. At the request the Town's inspection staff, the contractor increased the depth of his pipeline through a stretch di-ectly adjacent to the fiber optic lines to create a two-foot separation from the fiber optic lines and the proposed water main. The total amount for the change order is $672.00. Item 3. On the furthest western connection along Lambert Lane for this project, the plans show a connection adjacent to, and missing the existing fiber optic lines adjacent to the existing water main connection point. After field-verifying and digging up the existing main for the connection, the contractor encountered additional fiber optic lines and the design required modification to come in from the northern side of the existing pipeline instead from the southern portion of the pipeline as it was showed on the plans. This included extra depth, extra potholing and shoring equipment to insure that all fiber optic lines remained in place and intact. Additional fittings, materials, and labor were also necessary to reroute the water line in a manner so that the fiber optic lines could be protected and avoided. The total amount for this change order is $3,362.79. Item 4. After the project began and was out to public bid, the Oro Valley Water Utility was approached by Town staff to evaluate connection alternatives for the new CDO Riverfront Park project. To save money for the Park Department, two 12x8 tees were added with 8-inch valves to the 12-inch water line adjacent to the Riverfront Park so that the Park would not have to make live and more expensive taps into the existing system. Both 12x8 tees and valves were stubbed out and plugged for connection to the Riverfront Park. The total amount of this change order was $2,940.00. A:\AZ paving change order Itr.doc 2343 E. Broadway Blvd., Suite 202 • Tucson, AZ 85719 520.206.9585 Fax 520.206.9518 Mr. David Hook, P.E. March 29, 1999 Page 2 Item 5. As we got into this project, it was determined that Town preferred to install a fire hydrant at the entrance of the Highlands Trailer Park adjacent to the proposed alignment. This connection included installation of a new fire hydrant, a 6x6 tapping sleeve and valve, and pavement cuts and traffic control necessary to install this fire hydrant. The total cost for this change order is $5,355.50. Item 6. As pipeline installation went on, the trenching crews hit an existing private 6-inch sewer main which was not shown on the existing plans, nor was bluestaked due to the fact that it was a private line connecting into the public sewer system within public ROW. Upon hitting the existing line, the contractor had to maintain service for existing customers, provide a temporary patch for the 6-inch private sewer, incurred standby time for pipe delivery, and had to modify the design of the 12-inch main to meet the minimum separation and material standards between the proposed water main and the existing sewer main per ADEQ standards. The total cost for this change order is $6,784.31. Item 7. The existing plans provided by Cella Barr & Associates showed the 12-inch main connecting into an 8-inch main for a small stretch along the Lambert Lane alignment. In an effort to keep all of the lines within Lambert Lane a 12-inch, the Town evaluated alternatives looking at extended the 12-inch main approximately 100 feet beyond the project limits and connecting into the existing 12-inch water main, which would make a better connection for the system. This was an intensive effort being that there were several fiber optic lines and a sewer main that provided several constraints. The contractor field- verified the location of all utilities, added additional ductile iron pipe, bends and fittings to avoid the existing main, and tied into the existing 12-inch main within the Lambert Lane right-of-way. The total amount of this change order was $9,385.65. GENERAL The final quantity calculations differed slightly from the Engineer's estimate of quantities for the project. The final adjustment for quantities using the unit prices bid create a change order of(-)$144.50 for the project. SUMMARY Southern Arizona Paving and Construction Company was highly professional in this project, handled all conflicts, and/or unforeseen field conditions in an expedient manner. We recommend that these change orders be granted to Southern Arizona Paving for a total change order amount of$29,319.25. If you have any questions regarding this information or if you need additional information on the project, please let me know. Respectfully, WestLand Resources,Inc. k.cs-w)ae/Ckli,a4,4„,„„3 Thomas A. Martinez,P.E. Civil Engineer TAM:jc A.\AZ paving change order ltr.doc ATTACHMENT B SOUTHERN ARIZONA PAVING AND CONSTRUCTON CO. 4001 E. ILLINOIS TUCSON, AZ 85714 Phone(520) 745-8181 Fax(520) 745-8808 PROJECT: Town of Oro Valley 12"Main Extension LOCATION Lambert Lane, WORK DESCRIPTION ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL 1 Change DIP CL 350 to CL 52 235 LF $ 4.10 $ 963.50 2 Extra Depth for 2' separation from fiber optics 1 LS $ 672.00 $ 672.00 3 Extra Work for rerouting under existing water line and fiber optics 1 LS $3,362.79 $3,362.79 4 12"x8"Tee,valve, B&C,plugs 2 EA $1,470.00 $2,940.00 5 Fire Hydrant, including 6"x6"tapping sleeve, sawcut roadway,patching additional Traffic Control, etc. 1 EA $5,355.50 $5,355.50 6 Install 12"DIP pipe under 6"sewer, including standby time for pipe delivery and extra depth 1 EA $6,784.31 $6,784,31 7 Install 12"pipe beyond project limits under utilities including 90-degree bend,extra depth and potholing utilities. 1 EA $9,385.65 $9,385.65 TOTAL $29,463.75 For Owner: For S.A.PC\ Signed: Signed: \--Aew--4)67 (Vt. et, A:\AZ paving change order Itr.doc (for Recorder's Use) NOTE: To be recorded with the County WHEN RECORDED, RETURN TO Recorder within 10 days after acceptance. Town Clerk Town of Oro Valley 11000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley, AZ 85737 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE is hereby given by the undersigned owner, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona, that a Public Works Project described as: Project No. W07-0798 Town of Oro Valley Water Utility Water Main Extension (2700 Zone) Has been completed and was accepted by the undersigned awarding authority on the date specified herein. CONTRACTOR ON THE PROJECT: Name Southern Arizona Paving Address 4001 E. Illinois City/State Tucson, Arizona 85714 SURETY FOR CONTRACTOR'S BOND IS: Safeco Insurance Company of America Safeco Plaza Seattle, Washington 98185 The Real Property upon which said work as preformed is in the Town of Oro Valley, County of Pima, State of Arizona, described more specifically as follows: Along the southern Right-of-Way of Lambert Lane, Sections 11 and 12 of Township 12 South, Range 13 East DATE: January 15, 1999 (Date of Completion (Name of Political Subdivision) DATE: April 7, 1999 (Date of Acceptance) (Name of Political Subdivision) STATE of ARIZONA ) By: ) ss. Mayor COUNTY OF PIMA ) By: Town Clerk I hereby certify that I am the of the Governing Board of the_ , the political subdivision which executed the foregoing notice and on whose behalf I make this verification; that I have read said notice, know its contents, and that the same is true. I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at: , Arizona on 19 . Town Clerk, Town of Oro Valley A:\AZ paving change order ltr.doc TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: April 7, 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Dennis Silva, Jr., Planner I SUBJECT: OV12-98-20 ST. MARY'S MPP,PUBLIC ART PROPOSAL BACKGROUND: Gromatzky Dupree ree & Associates, representing the St. Mary's Medical Park Pharmacy (MPP), received Town Council approval for their development and landscape plan. The subject property is a 1.81-acre lot with a pp p 19,661 square foot buildingenvelope, located on Lot 4 of the Foothills Business Park. The subject property is q p abutted on the north by Mavinee Drive, to the south by a Pima County public drainage way, to the east by Lot 3, a self-storage facility, and west by Lot 5, which is undeveloped. The existing zoning for this project is Campus y Park Industrial CPI in the La Reserve PAD and permits professional offices and warehouses, which is the proposed use for this development—specifically a prescription drug mail-order facility. SUMMARY: Per Section 4-504F of the OVZCR, all new commercial related projects shall contribute 1% of he project cost towardsp ublic art. The attached public art proposal has been reviewed and recommended by the Public Art T)eview Committee (PARC). The proposed public art will be displayed in the lobby of the main building for St. lary's MPP. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the proposed Public Art for St. Mary's MPP at Foothills Business Park, as it meets the requirements in OVZCR and has been recommended by the PARC. SUGGESTED MOTION: The Council may wish to consider one of the following motions: I move to approve OV 12-98-20 St. Mary's MPP at Foothills Business P k Public Art, attached herewith. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Reduced Copy of the Proposed Public Art P1 g and Zoning Administrator // I ' i 41 / 61 ;; AP F:\ov\ovi2\1998\12-98-20\pubarttc.rpt Co, , unity De -,I ment D ector f Town M. t.ger _ + . sr: • . •:. •a " " .---, ,f,� ., 1.--,,�} .r'' -4.,. ,C2. ` s". , $ A 3, , t:i. . -, S t.s-f -, s .- - Z :7-.. T • .0,. Wi -et :, i. L- .Y � f; ..y T ._ .; - p v *' ,` : t..a +. gi ;•-,-,-',-,c-,-' F: -.; - Z ... % y -. u =yi �'.- is 4 . -'a = :': r0 Y r7r0 > " s w �- T• .r ^ l O z 4 Z zl ii. :: *• FA ,, :7::.. _ ,`•E ,,,, *-.7. .7..-7. -,7._ 2 :.: ---; -. r i.7.,,,,..„-„7•.—- '-',''' — i 2 r: • �r � J r n" . f '''- s -ms ' ^ vr teys , ? 7C T '" , .�-r.^ >. -„,......,..-•-4,,,...„....--T---, w— :.,-;,-,,,,•..4- :.:-:-.; -.7.'a4L-4'4.fri--7t-t,"7,4 . --..titk•'. •*.-- -;-- _ -:,-,:-.77-,•:c.',..„' • :-±.-,.-..-.',. -.;..1.,,.1-:-'-••--:,----:F '.--, `;- `.. --, ; _ ,-17,-,/r. ": ?�! ,-.� 1 -...,,,-.--„,_-4-,..- -,:-...„,.,es - ._ , 't1 � t..� $'/ ... ., { �„� o .,-, ls.,,",..4,,,, ' z-.-1 :,,:- ,----",it),__b.:. - '. .t.'„•-i .- -,; ,:,_-,4-,..„—.'_-:-c-.',-- ''-k-,,,,:,,-J„- 4 q - '-....,-;....,'.1. . '..-.4.,i '-'-• ‘'-, '-'6.3. '',•''',,:;'''-4:3,.e ,S4..e-.-.,•',,,,n Tj -,r.r .,� l...;a1,. • ..-- . - ..,---ii. -,-. •.• '4- [f��3�r�����:�:��,���js��[[ r •c; �moi.'-�'10-,.�a v ,� --;,..7--,-„- rS, >.! ... .A „,,,,A , ,...-, ,...:..,... ... , .. --- vri,..:. ' _..... -."7tF;.}a a.:'4„�..” .`�. Qw,„,,,.,,..._•,c.' c,r. �,y .- f \ ,_ . •...... 'r i�;, _ F' t r vay . .r•t--' Ylitiii „F+#- �Sr s� 1''�..L�r '..a',ax. -f'r-- �� `-1..�l ="�:rx� r-... • •�'�.j x .,..,,:,-,.„ .-_ ..•r�.--C1 _ 1'1 �•4 •� tyt�T�{��IN. t S" �-yi!i,�'^�'..�,y.y,���-�• �: •�. w�A "-..,fit • 4,..) '$ i �^ '7/'• j„: ��. i .ti'^- �. Off'• T.- „ �. 4. • • -,-I-.- Ai '''...l'Alk--7#1.1-,. ... ;-1ai.,-.-.' tipp „,,..„.. ;,.,::„...„.„.:, ._ti . 1Y i t �`�(j -`i3: s f �4 ' ✓ ''_�> y.�r'�,. ;,*,--4,-"I`+1 � -v.-ii?',-,1:7-,,� s>,� °� •�./ ,�• �� • :v7..„,_,..„.........„,,,,,..„__.,,,i7i37 i-..--+,-..+..� .�� 4,.-,.. r..., ,,,--: :,-,,,,i.,„.„-,,iliF ,, -,....' ..„, ...0 1.i',,,,,,,..,..„:„., ..„,e.,,,,... , ,,,,,,,:, ,„ '...,” , t........cW;,, -.,-1-i..C' -.-... ‘- '- '-'" . -14::‘V.J-.iio-,! 40... -*.. '.,...., -.----;k4:, -"----. .-..,' ig49..'-o.::,- -:- s'‘''' .., ,.:,, .. . ,,, ,i, \,,..‘ii,-,; -,..,,,,-, . t- . !--:.--: -. ,....., .. - - - ;7---,..-v-.-:fi ,i4kL. \. _ • f 7 .♦^- ..../ .. ,�-, - - 1., '✓�,,• , - • , ! ti_ 'is:-..',.-',.....?;>„,-,;44/1111,....--:'-'1••••,: ,.. 1 �',��* `i i%-_7,�) i :., .:;7-:::, �., to *.1 f. *�,,,..',4'.:, .4.1�+ T- -.:'**41:/ - .- ' ': ..:-'-''.- -----..'-':••- ,2-.---,---, ___,../.....-L-n,..,,,...--it- 7-,',4,,,,f,.., ... ;,*0..., '96--.'": - � f •' `..3:----7.-Art, hl►.i'•• 1 r}+�g i, .. �'', - iJ • yam.-: ," „,,:,.7.. ,'..,,,, -. •\ . :',:... ',.^;moi �a,...ct” e."-:.1. � � `�� '� r:;�+t, - � •.tea, 4 ', ‘ * 010,...,..--,47-4,..,,,,-§,- `....,....:,,,... • - ': 't l':-"'''' '''''''''."'4' - s " • :1-•;-:'---- ,--i- 4"--:: --, '----1*..,--.7._-- 1-..--:'"- 7/ ,.., lio, .::,.,!; 'lir, :::,,-..:7-*;_ • :-.,2-_----,-4::.,,;ii.,-;-",..' ' ‘.‘"4-iy• • *-:,. .-..4-0: "� -'`ice10-1,•;13:11 +z =�=~ 4 �' \• � � �f • „..r, „ tin -Arc, t . ,s. ,,,__ „�: �� � .-tet,"t �{ e,•:.-,..4_/;-.",_--�••�: - • _.-.�4 ,' - `-�"�?-. �1•..- ,.• { •,Ea.+y-' i eye 1' { -i.'''.-,—, - . .--•—•,"' -,,,, *: ',4 -bt•Astillyi.,, ;7 AL: V -*.11`, =. , i nes \ , Y y ---,-,'1.-,7,4-N,,, * V; -!:. tkiait .2......- •••••••\ --_, ..:4.,,er':,,,‘---.... ..!'..L_'-'.-. :,'"4 l'a..;s\S'71.4S'. 4,-.es's,':*' c.`".':-',,- ;M I --1.5:74-: < - �.- ( t� _ .','- ',;,,-,4;1...-•:':•14-,‘ i '!'...,:.. 14 • `4".f'•;1 1-- r,..J..ra '.•t7 r _ r .:.t� "�+.' �tt.,y�T4-„,.,=-7.- k':•,' y :',A-1,-.„-/;-.4 . .,-1Z-/,':-/,'-; // r • .i _'�-•_ ',Ai-Tr �� „r ��;.k'e" :,t`+�s�� ri �; e ' r T9'` � ._�-- - �,- ;� ;X _ u•-��:{i. . f w�'�'"'.,."�s 1•��-I-•�.S.tl� .�Y• '.;:4-±7'.' . ---r-‘- ltilf 't,'i...-'..'!-'.'' ' ',-•-;',..,:' f N *• •�,�„.3wa 1' _f '(. a.}. sem....'Y s.f- 2 aj .fwd r i.# �` ti i`1i �J K j __ . ' ._ •. "• V l - ---.'i,.1..',-* -] �C. - I: -r ,.::-. , ....c.--_,'',,--:', -;.'. <-4:,: ' .- .---.--,',,,-,,,,---"e9 -,.. -i;,--- .._' ., -k-_ • . .311, f, \ \ _ -,_.».,,,ter..-IF:7,..,......, n .. -_.-;.... . _:r , _- '-s: .•- -,�br' . L- ',7-7... i a.. s ♦ ; ,� ` �` _ ,_ ^fir' ,,.-r*" "f '� - ' 1i $ : „. ..e. o T TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: April 7, 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Dennis Silva, Jr., Planner I SUBJECT: OV1 2-98-20 ST. MARY'S MPP,PUBLIC ART PROPOSAL BACKGROUND: Medical Park Pharmacy (MPP), received Town tzk Dupree & Associates, representing the St. Mary's Gromatzky p The subject property is a 1.81-acre lot with a Council approval for their development and landscape plan. J p p pp Foothills Business Park. The subject property is 19,661 square foot building envelope, located on Lot 4 of the q public drainage way, to the east by Lot 3, on the north byMavinee Drive, to the south by a Pima County p• g abutted • • is undeveloped. The existing zoning for this project is Campus a self-storage faculty, and west by Lot 5, which p g • andpermitsprofessional offices and warehouses, which is the Park Industrial (CPI) in the La Reserve PAD • • —specifically a prescription drug mail-order facility. proposed use for this developmentp y SUMMARY: • commercial related projects shall contribute 1% of he project cost Per Section 4-504F of the OVZCR, all new p J Art has been reviewed and recommended by the Public towards public art. The attached public art proposalinQ for St. public art will belayed in the lobby of the main build displayed'.eview Committee (PARC). The proposed p Mary's MPP. RECOMMENDATION: ' Mary's MPP at Foothills Business Park, as it recommends approval of the proposed Public Art for St. Staff pp q meets the requirements in OVZCR and has been recommended by the PARC. SUGGESTED MOTION: The Council may wish to consider one of the following motions: Mary'sMPP at Foothills Business P k Public Art, attached herewith. I move to approve OV 12 98-20 St. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Reduced Copy of the Proposed Public Art P1 g and Zoning Administrator 41) 14$' Ari F:\ov\ov12\1998\12-98-20\pubarttc.rpt Co, , unity De : sment D' ector �i 4 Town M. .ger 2 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: April 7, 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk SUBJECT: Resolution No. (R)99-41 — Canvass of the Votes — Declaring and adopting the results of the Special/Recall Election held on March 9, 1999 regarding Oro Valley Fraternal Order of Police Lodge #53 Initiative known as Proposition 200 SUMMARY: The attached resolution declares and adopts the results of the special/recall election held on March 9, 1999 regarding Oro Valley Fraternal Order of Police Lodge#53 Initiative known as Proposition 200. Attached are the final totals from Pima County Elections: Yes 2,570 (66%) No 1,025 (26%) RECOMMENDATION: Approve Resolution No. (R)99-41 canvassing the votes of the March 9, 1999 Special/Recall Election regarding Oro Valley Fraternal Order of Police Lodge#53 Initiative known as Proposition 200. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. (R)99-41. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. (R)99-41 2. Final results from Pima County Elections �� �• (4.42.€,J.Ze:%— D -p;r� nt Head Town Manager RESOLUTION NO. (R) 99-41 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA, DECLARING AND ADOPTING THE RESULTS OF THE SPECIAL/RECALL ELECTION HELD ON MARCH 9, 1999 REGARDING ORO VALLEY FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE LODGE #53 INITIATIVE KNOWN AS PROPOSITION 200 . WHEREAS, the Town of Oro Valley, Pima County, Arizona did hold a special/recall election on the 9th day of March 1999 . WHEREAS, the election returns have been presented to and have been canvassed by the town council . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, as follows : SECTION 1. That the total number of ballots cast at said special/recall election, as shown by the poll lists, was 3 , 875 . Total Ballots counted was 3 , 875 . SECTION 2 . That the number of to be verified ballots processed was 15, and that the number of to be verified ballots not verified to count were 4 . SECTION 3 . That the votes cast for FOP Initiative known as Proposition 200 were as follows : YES 2 , 570 NO 1, 025 SECTION 4 . That Proposition 200 did receive a majority of the ballots cast in said Special/Recall Election. SECTION 5 . The FOP Initiative which was the basis of Proposition 200 was the subject of the case Schmitz v. Cuvelier, Pima County Superior Court No. 328724 , Court of Appeals No. 2 CA-CV 98-0223 , Supreme Court No. CV-99-0031-PR, in which the FOP Initiative was determined to be null and void. SECTION 6 . The mandate from the Arizona Court of Appeals, making the appellate court ruling in the Schmitz v. Cuvelier case effective, will be issued as a matter of course approximately two days after the canvass of the election is required to be performed under Article IV, Part 1, Section 1 (13) of the ARIZONA CONSTITUTION. SECTION 7 . The Town is performing this canvass to comply with its technical obligation under the ARIZONA CONSTITUTION to canvass the vote within thirty days . SECTION 8 . Due to the impending issuance of the mandate from the Court of Appeals, the Mayor will not issue a proclamation declaring that Proposition 200 is approved, and nothing in this resolution shall be construed as a determination that the ordinance which was the subject of Proposition 200 is in any way approved, in force, or effective . SECTION 9 . This resolution is in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, this 7th day of April, 1999 . Paul H. Loomis, Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn E. Cuvelier, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Tobin Sidles, Town Attorney Election Summary Report Date:03/17/99 50 Oro ValleyProp200 Count, March 16, 1999 Time: : f1 Page1 Summary for Jurisdiction Wide, All Races ORO VALLEY PROPOSITION 200 VoteFor: 1 Polling Early TBV Lates Precincts Reporting 5/5 5/5 5/5 5/5 5/5 100.00% Ballots Cast/Reg. Voters(15484) 3516 341 16 2 3875 25.03% Total Votes 3273 306 16 0 3595 92.77% Times Blank Voted 241 35 0 2 278 7.17% Times Over Voted 2 0 0 0 1 2 0.05 % Number Of Under Votes 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% YES 2337 220 13 0 2570 66.32% NO 936 86 3 0 1025 26.45% I Election Summary Report Date:03/17/99 Oro Valle Pro 200 Count, March 16 1999 Time:15: 5y p Pagel of 1 Summary for 09-01, All Races ORO VALLEY PROPOSITION 200 f VoteFor: 1 Polling Early TBV Lates Precincts Reporting 1/1 1/1 1/1 1/1 1/1 100.00% '- Ballots Cast/Reg. Voters(3473) 1510 110 4 0 1624 46.76% Total Votes 1390 102 4 0 1496 92.12% Times Blank Voted 120 8 0 0 128 7.88% Times Over Voted 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Number Of Under Votes 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% YES 983 75 3 0 1061 65.33% NO 407 27 1 0 435 26.79% Election Summary Report Date:03/17/99 26 Oro ValleyProp200 Count, March 16 1999 TimPag .I of 1 Summary for 09-02, All Races ORO VALLEY PROPOSITION 200 VoteFor: 1 Polling Early TBV Lates Precincts Reporting 1/1 1/1 1/1 1/1 1/1 100.00% Ballots Cast/Reg. Voters (2200) 461 44 3 0 508 23.09% Total Votes 441 42 3 0 486 95.67% Times Blank Voted 20 2 0 0 22 4.33% Times Over Voted 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Number Of Under Votes 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% YES 323 26 3 0 352 69.29% NO 118 16 0 0 134 26.38% Election Summary Report Date:03/17/99 Oro Valley Pro 200 Count, March 16 1999 Time:15:15:29 P g Pa e:l of 1 Summary for 09-03, All Races ORO VALLEY PROPOSITION 200 VoteFor: 1 Polling Early TBV Lates Precincts Reporting 1/1 1/1 1/1 1/1 1/1 100.00% Ballots Cast/Reg. Voters(5517) 894 101 8 2 1005 18.22% Total Votes 860 90 8 0 958 95.32% Times Blank Voted 34 11 0 2 47 4.68% Times Over Voted 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Number Of Under Votes 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% YES 628 68 7 0 703 69.95% NO 232 22 1 0 255 ....,',.. ..:.',: :,. ,..--.:.,,., .Y..;, sr✓.,.,:.s.',.,.sc!.Vt,ey,'.°9?;°y;?!°Hr;lb?!oJh9yg"!»q• %SJ Election Summary Report Date:03/17/99 Oro Valley Prop200 Count, March 16, 1999 Time:15: 5g Pa e:l of 1 Summary for 09-04, All Races ORO VALLEY PROPOSITION 200 VoteFor: 1 Polling Early TBV Lates Precincts Reporting i/1 1/1 1/1 1/1 1/1 100.00% ` Ballots Cast/Re Voters Cast/Reg. (2375) 372 52 1 0 425 17.89% Total Votes 320 42 1 0 363 85.41% Times Blank Voted 51 10 0 0 61 14.35% Times Over Voted 1 0 0 0 1 0.24% Number Of Under Votes 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% YES 213 26 0 0 239 56.24% NO 107 16 1 o 124 29.18% ;� m .1/� Z Election Summary Report Date:03/17/99 Oro Valley Prop 200 Count, March 16, 1999 Time:15:15:36 Pagel of l Summary for 09-05, All Races ORO VALLEY PROPOSITION 200 VoteFor: 1 Polling Early TBV Lates Precincts Reporting 1/1 1/1 1/1 1/1 1/1 100.00% 4 Ballots Cast/Reg. Voters 1919 � ) 279 34 0 0 313 16.31% Total Votes 262 30 0 0 292 93.29% Times Blank Voted 16 4 0 0 20 6.39% 1 Times Over Voted 1 0 0 0 1 0.32% Number Of Under Votes 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% YES 190 25 0 0 215 68.69% NO 72 5 77 Statement of Votes Cast Date:03/17/99 Oro ValleyProp200 Count, March 16 1999 Time:15:16: 3 g Pa e:l of 1 TURN OUT ORO VALLEY PROPOSITION 200 O*) IO -o O O IC > > cn C y �L V• o " V v > o g 0 0 E > O > Fa 4 .r 0 U E— ?-. 7. Jurisdiction Wide 047 833 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 134 840 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 09-01 3473 1624 46.76% 3473 1624 1496 0 0 128 1061 435 09-02 2200 508 23.09% 2200 508 486 0 0 22 352 134 09-03 5517 1005 18.22% 5517 1005 958 0 0 47 703 255 09-04 2375 425 17.89% 2375 425 363 1 0 61 239 124 09-05 1919 313 16.31% 1919 313 292 1 0 20 215 77 10-01 1246 1 0.08% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10-02 2713 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30-01 467 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30-02 438 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30-03 1440 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30-04 606 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30-05 593 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30-06 272 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24932 3876 15.55% 15484 3875 3595 2 0 278 2570 1025 3 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: April 7, 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL FROM: Steven Faaborg, Civil Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Ordinance No. (0)99-18 , establishing a speed limit for Monterra Vista Drive between Naranja Road and Tangerine Road. SUMMARY: Monterra Vista Drive is located approximately one mile east of La Canada Drive and extends from Naranja Drive on the south to Tangerine Road on the north. It traverses the Monterra Hills, Monterra Knolls and Monterra Ridge subdivisions. The street had been constructed and accepted by Pima County prior to Oro Valley's annexation of the area in December of 1994. Presently no speed limit has been set for this street, therefore the speed limit would be 25 miles per hour per Chapter 11 Section 11-3-4Q of the Town Code. The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, 1988 Edition suggests that the following factors be considered when determining the proper numerical value for a speed zone: 1. Road surface characteristics, shoulder condition, grade, alignment and sight distance. Monterra Vista Drive is a paved street with 2" of asphaltic concrete over 4" of asphaltic base course. It has 6" vertical curbs and is 38' in width between curbs. Vertical curves, grades, sight distances and alignment within the zone meet the requirements for a 30 M.P.H. design speed 2. The 85th-percentile speed and pace speed. No speed study has been done on Monterra Vista Drive. Because the area has not been built-out, such a study would not be reflective of future conditions. 3. Roadside development and culture, and roadside friction. The area adjoining Monterra Vista Drive is entirely residential. A 1' no access easement has been established along the Monterra Vista Drive right-of-way so that driveways for adjoining lots will be placed on the side streets. All streets intersecting with Monterra Vista Drive between Naranja Drive and Tangerine Road will be controlled with stop signs. Monterra Vista Drive has stop signs at both Naranja Drive and Tangerine Road. 4. Safe speed for curves or hazardous conditions within the zone. Horizontal curves within the zone meet the requirements for a 30 M.P.H. design speed. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION PAGE 2 OF 2 5. Parking practices and pedestrian activity. Ultimately as a collector, this street should be posted for no parking. The improvement plans indicate that sidewalks will be provided on both sides of the street, in fact, most of these sidewalks are in place. 6 . Reported accident experience for a recent 12-month period. A review of the accident reports on file with the Department of Public Works revealed no reportable accidents for the 12-month period ending August 1, 1998. Based on these criteria, a 30 mile-per-hour speed limit would be justified for this section of street. ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance No. (0)99-18 , An ordinance of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona amending Chapter 11 Section 11-3-4 of the code of the Town of Oro Valley pertaining to speed limits and providing penalties for violations thereof. FISCAL IMPACT: S130 for installation of two signs, plus yearly maintenance. RECOMMENDATIONS OF STAFF: The Department of Public Works recommends approval of Ordinance (0)99-18 , establishing a speed limit of 30 miles-per-hour on portions of Monterra Vista Drive. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to approve Ordinance (0)99-18 , establishing a speed limit of 30 miles-per-hour on portions of Monterra Vista Drive. or I move to deny Ordinance (0)99-18 , establishing a speed limit of 30 miles-per-hour on portions of Monterra Vista Drive. jt Department Hea h -.ofe 4// . i '/A Town anager ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-18 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA AMENDING CHAPTER 11 SECTION 11-3-4 OF THE CODE OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PERTAINING TO SPEED LIMITS AND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF WHEREAS, Chapter 11 Section 11-3-4 of the Oro Valley Town Code allows that either the Town Engineer or Chief of Police with the Approval of Council shall place and maintain traffic control devices deemed necessary to regulate traffic under the traffic laws of the town or state; and, WHEREAS, a review of current engineering standards has determined that the existing 25 mph speed limit is out of compliance; therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA: SECTION 1: That Chapter 11 Section 11-3-4Q of the Town Code of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, is amended to read: Monterra Vista Drive from Naranja Drive to Tangerine Road: 30 mile per hour. That Chapter 11 Section 11-3-4R is added to read: All other streets, roads and areas: 25 miles per hour. SECTION 2: Any person found guilty of violating any provision to this Ordinance shall be guilty and shall be punished as provided by state law for the same or similar offenses. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this 7TH day of APRIL , 1999. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA Paul H. Loomis, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Kathryn E. Cuvelier, Town Clerk Dan L. Dudley, Town Attorney Date Date 4 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: April 7, 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL FROM: Steven Faaborg, Civil Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Ordinance No. (0)99- 19 , revising the speed limit for Woodburne Avenue between Arrowsmith Drive and Rancho Vistoso Boulevard. SUMMARY: Paving has recently been completed on the portion of Woodburne Avenue between Arrowsmith Drive and Rancho Vistoso Boulevard. The right-of-way for this segment of Woodburne Avenue has not yet been dedicated to the Town of Oro Valley although the expectation is that this will soon occur. The speed limit is set by Chapter 11 Section 11-3-4I of the Town Code to be 35 miles per hour from Moore Road to Rancho Vistoso Boulevard. This speed limit was apparently set when the Town annexed Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 7 Unit 1, including the portion of the road between Moore Road and Arrowsmith Drive, in 1987. At that time the portion of Woodburne Avenue south of Arrowsmith Drive had not been constructed, however it was included in the description for Chapter 11 Section 11-3-4I. A review of the newly constructed portion of Woodburne Avenue indicates that a speed limit of 25 miles per hour would be more appropriate, mainly due to the sight visibility at intersections from side streets in this area. There is also a park adjacent to this portion of Woodburne Avenue, also contributing to the need for a slower speed limit. This ordinance would remove this portion from Chapter 11 Section 11-3-4I, effectively changing the speed limit to 25 miles per hour as indicated by Chapter 11 Section 11-3-4Q; "All other streets and roads 25 miles per hour". ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance No. (0)99- 19 , An ordinance of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona amending Chapter 11 Section 11-3-4 of the code of the Town of Oro Valley pertaining to speed limits and providing penalties for violations thereof. FISCAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATIONS OF STAFF: The Department of Public Works recommends approval of Ordinance (0)99- 19 , amending Chapter 11 Section 11-3-4I to read "Woodburne Avenue from Moore Road to Arrowsmith Drive: 35 miles per hour". TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION PAGE 2 OF 2 SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to approve Ordinance (0)99-19 , amending Chapter 11 Section 11-3-4I to read "Woodburne Avenue from Moore Road to Arrowsmith Drive: 35 miles per hour". or I move to deny Ordinance (0)99-19 , amending Chapter 11 Section 11-3-4I to read "Woodburne Avenue from Moore Road to Arrowsmith Drive: 35 miles per hour". Department Head ( / 10of Police , Town Manager ORDINANCE NO. (0)99- 19 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA AMENDING CHAPTER 11 SECTION 11-3-4 OF THE CODE OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PERTAINING TO SPEED LIMITS AND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF WHEREAS, Chapter 11 Section 11-3-4 of the Oro Valley Town Code allows that either the Town Engineer or Chief of Police with the Approval of Council shall place and maintain traffic control devices deemed necessary to regulate traffic under the traffic laws of the town or state; and, WHEREAS, the portion of Woodburne Avenue between Arrowsmith Drive and Rancho Vistoso Boulevard has been recently opened to the public, and, WHEREAS, a review of current engineering standards has determined that the existing 35 mph speed limit is out of compliance; therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA: SECTION 1: That Chapter 11 Section 11-3-4I of the Town Code of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, is amended to read: Woodburne Avenue from Moore Road to Arrowsmith Drive: 35 miles per hour; SECTION 2: Any person found guilty of violating any provision to this Ordinance shall be guilty and shall be punished as provided by state law for the same or similar offenses. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this STH day of APRIL , 1999. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA Paul H. Loomis, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Kathryn E. Cuvelier, Town Clerk Dan L. Dudley, Town Attorney Date Date 5 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: April 7, 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR 8c COUNCIL FROM: William A.Jansen, P.E. Town Engineer SUBJECT: Resolution No. (R)9942_ A resolution to approve Green Tree Estates Homeowner's Association request for the Town of Oro Valley's to accept maintenance of streetlights on Green Tree Drive SUMMARY: On March 20, 1991, the Town Council adopted resolution No. (R)91-11 approving an agreement authorizing the Sun City Community Association to create, maintain and operate street lights along and within the Rancho Vistoso Boulevard public right-of-way in Sun City. In late 1995, the Sun City Vistoso Community Association sent a letter of intention to the Town advising of their intention to terminate the street light agreement. Pursuant to that letter, on July 1, 1996, the Town assumed the responsibility for maintenance and operation of the streetlights in Sun City on Rancho Vistoso Boulevard. The Town contracts out all maintenance work on streetlights. The eight streetlights in Green Tree Estates are not part of the original agreement with the Sun City Community Association. The Green Tree Estates Homeowner's Association is responsible for the cost of operation and maintenance of these streetlights. Because of the expense involved in maintaining the street lights, the Green Tree Estates Homeowner's Association has requested that the Town take over maintenance of the eight existing streetlights along Green Tree Drive FISCAL IMPACT: $1025 annually ($275 annually for electricity, and an average of$750 for annual maintenance) RECOMMENDATIONS: With the exception of the street lights along Rancho Vistoso Boulevard in Sun City, the Town policy has been to establish and maintain street lights at major intersections. The streetlights in Green Tree Estates are not at a major intersection and, for the most part, benefit only those citizens residing in Green Tree Estates. Therefore, Department of Public Works staff does not support this request. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION PAGE 2 OF 2 SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. (R)99-42 A resolution to approve Green Tree Estates Homeowner's Association request for the Town of Oro Valley's to accept maintenance of streetlights on Green Tree Drive. Or I move to deny Resolution No. (R)99-4?A resolution to approve Green Tree Estates Homeowner's Association request for the Town of Oro Valley's to accept maintenance of streetlights on Green Tree Drive. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Map of SCV Unit 1 Subdivision 2. Resolution No. (R)99-42 A resolution to approve Green Tree Estates Homeowner's Association request for the Town of Oro Valley's to accept maintenance of streetlights on Green Tree Drive. D-•artment - IL Town M. ager RESOLUTION NO.(R)99- 42 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, TO APPROVE GREEN TREE ESTATES HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCITATION REQUEST FOR THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY TO ACCEPT 1VIAINTENANCE OF STREETLIGHTS ON GREEN TREE DRIVE. WHEREAS, ORO VALLEY is a political subdivision of the State of Arizona, is vested with all the rights, privileges and benefits, and entitled to the immunities and exemptions granted municipalities and political subdivisions under the Constitution and laws of the State of Arizona and the United States; and WHEREAS,the maintenance of street lights in the public right-of-way is necessary for the public health and welfare in order to provide safe night-time travel; and WHEREAS, the existing streetlights on Green Tree Drive are within the Town of Oro Valley road right-of-way; and WHEREAS, the Green Tree Estates Homeowner's Association currently operates and maintains the streetlights on Green Tree Drive; and WHEREAS, the TOWN COUNCIL deems it necessary in the interest of providing for the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of the TOWN OF ORO VALLEY to accepting the maintenance of the streetlights on Green Tree Drive. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE MAYOR AND THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY,ARIZONA: That the Green Tree Estates Homeowner's Association request for the Town of Oro Valley's to accept maintenance of streetlights on Green Tree Drive is approved. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley,Arizona this 7TRday of APRIL , 1999. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY,ARIZONA Paul H. Loomis,Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Kathryn E. Cuvelier, Town Clerk Tobin Sidles,Town Attorney Date Date ) \ vy: \'\:11 ; \--1--\-----:::—.\ tolls,:ir...:_•..."1,E.... %.1 \ '‘,';'....,k,,,\31 ' ''',, \ "0V:\ i 7 .14",4: 1.- '. All 4 410 4. ,,..7.!,., .'::,,. .!ii A, .,�•7,'�;�";'ir`"rte�, •- ` <<i0 \ 6\D\' NN......./, . 01111101.1. GI:' ........ d 0. .1f4' 011,00_. .-1- ., \ r4". " C'i 35 38 i. / ,.....‘,.:.,,.;,,,,,, ,..., �r 4039 38 A 4 , 4 3 y + .-.4; Iiiis ,0'7'fIlt:1 'y , -11-* • ,..--' A ),, 15 , 0 ? 11,1022 cr‘ 'h 4:,. , , .4 4 4 -;,:. y trt:1 if. ' : ,. .7v,...,f, 0 1\41ilk,:2::, I Q '- c F 200 it g / JaJ: 4: -i h 8g---- 4,,,,, ., tft Iti - h`6 p 29 E. itotk. ` 5C.' ... , 1.1 i 0 (17i' .;.:- i', .x. \ ', -i1.7-. 5 :' -_I- '•.- li ,sc3,3‘4‘ 6 C5L 8 e3 ,..., 68 Ell -,,,, Li.1 5 27 .;:. (IA 26 g .t.,9 , as r�++• 7,3r4 k . 9 � 10 It Lz. 556 T:,„), 11 lipk, . 0 ir 1:.,. 400 ik CD el 4.-A 12 iti • qt...2) '2-c, .•;i., .P.: CI 1/44: 13 qp :6 ,it ( rt ell 0 lia •t 5 24 �' t x: Vi.. t 9 Iiiiii �;;. 2112 1 6 .. ¢ ,'. � .fib I�'�n ,�. �1 MMf� 1 1•t i',-, '-,1 4 ..eritr"14;t ifs pt-e10,•.i :,,it.t. .1 . --, 1100004"4# .. 10) li :4. ,--,_. dook Nt, • . A. % -LSC. 414 .,4;,.. i ,14. 11.4.. 4 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 6 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: April 7, 1999 O: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Dennis Silva, Jr., Planner I SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE (0)99-20 , MAP 3 TRANSLATION OF ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY SR TO ORO VALLEY R1-144 BACKGROUND: On August 5, 1998, pursuant to Section 9-471B of the Arizona Revised Statutes, the Town of Oro Valley Mayor and Council increased its area by annexing 455 acres, known as Map 3. The Town is required to change, or "translate", the zoning on the annexed properties from Pima County zoning designations to the closest comparable Oro Valley zoning designation. In accordance with State law, the Town must translate the County zoning by April of 1999. Properties listed within Map 3 are located north of Lambert Lane, approximately '/4 mile south of Naranja Drive, east of Shannon Road, and west of La Cholla Boulevard. SUMMARY: The following properties within Map 3 are to be translated: 1. OV9-99-23 Parcel#224-21-0020 Manning Property 2. OV9-99-24 Parcel#224-21-0030 Manning Property . OV9-99-25 Parcel#224-21-0040 Manning Property 4. OV9-99-26 Parcel#224-21-0050 Manning Property 5. OV9-99-27 Parcel#224-20-002D JMK Family Properties&Felker 6. OV9-99-29 Parcel#224-20-001C JMK Family Properties&Felker 7. OV9-99-30 Parcel#224-23-OO1A JMK Family Properties&Felker 8. OV9-99-31 Parcel#224-22-001K Dixon Property 9. OV9-99-32 Parcel#224-22-001R Caplan Property 10. OV9-99-33 Parcel#224-22-001W Wolin Property 11. OV9-99-34 Parcel#224-22-001V Worden Property 12. OV9-99-35 Parcel#224-22-001N Nelson Property 13. OV9-99-36 Parcel#224-22-OO1L Huss Property 14. OV9-99-3 7 Parcel#224-22-001J Holcomb Property 15. OV9-99-3 8 Parcel#224-22-001S Newton Property 16. OV9-99-39 Parcel#224-22-001M Fleming Property 17. OV9-99-40 Parcel#224-22-0020 Constantini Property 18. OV9-99-41 Parcel#224-22-0030 Constantini Property 19. OV9-99-42 Parcel#224-22-006C Constantini Property 20. OV9-99-43 Parcel#224-22-007B Lin Kuo-Minh Property 21. OV9-99-44 Parcel#224-22-0080 Lin Kuo-Minh Property 22. OV9-99-45 Parcel#224-22-004D Iglar Property 23. OV9-99-46 Parcel#224-22-006B Lin Kuo-Minh Property 24. OV9-99-47 Parcel#224-22-0050 Lin Kuo-Minh Property 25. OV9-99-48 Parcel#224-20-001X Nelson Property 26. OV9-99-49 Parcel#224-22-001U Wolin Property TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 3 _a accordance with State Statutes,the Town should translate Pima County's SR zoning, which allows single family residential (.3 DU/acre), to Oro Valley's closest equivalent designation, R1-144, Single Family Residential (also hermits .3 DU/acre). There was no pre-annexation agreement negotiated between the above-referenced property owners and the Town. GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE: About half of Map 3 is designated Rural Low Density Residential (RLDR)under the general plan land use map and the other half is shown as Schools, Low Density Residential(LDR),and Public/Semi-Public. Oro Valley R1-144 is the same or lower intensity than these designations. Therefore, the proposed translations are in conformance with the General Plan. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION ACTION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the translation of zoning for Map 3 by a 5 — 0 vote on March 2, 1999. RECOMMENDATION: Planning Staff recommends approval of the translation of zoning for the area known as Map 3 from Pima County SR to Oro Valley R1-144 and all applicable development standards of the R1-144 zoning district shall apply thereto. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to recommend approval of the zoning translation for Map 3, from Pima County SR to Oro Valley R1-144 and all applicable development standards of the R1-144 zoning district. OR I move to recommend approval of the zoning translation for Map 3, from Pima County SR to Oro Valley R1-144 and all applicable development standards of the R1-144 zoning district,and the following added conditions: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ordinance (0)99-20 2. Location Map TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION / Page 3 of 3 )Diel... . I -- r 1.. in:----4i Zoning Administrator Vi , Os' /- x.:,;um; N. C• -ii, unity De,'•,•ment D ector ior d ' 4 Town Man:ger F:\OV\OV9\1999\9-99-23\TZTC.RPT ORDINANCE NO. (0)99- 20 AN ORDINANCE TRANSLATING THE ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY SR TO ORO VALLEY R1-144, FOR THE PROPERTIES KNOWN AS MAP 3, LOCATED NORTH OF LAMBERT LANE APPROXIMATELY 1/4 MILE SOUTH OF NARANJA DRIVE, EAST OF SHANNON ROAD, AND WEST OF LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD. WHEREAS, the zoning for the properties located within Map 3 have been translated from Pima County SR to Oro Valley R1-144 and all applicable development standards of the R1-144 zoning district shall apply; WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, has considered said translational zoning with added conditions on these properties at a duly noticed Public Hearing, in accordance with State Statue, and having made its recommendations to the Town Council; and WHEREAS,the Oro Valley Town Council has duly considered the translational zoning at a Public Hearing and finds that it is consistent with the Town's General Plan, Tangerine Corridor Overlay District, and other Town ordinances, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY: SECTION 1. That the properties contained within Map 3 be translationally zoned from Pima County SR to Oro Valley R1-144, and that all applicable development standards of the R1- 144 zoning district shall apply to said properties. SECTION 2. That all ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be and the same are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict; SECTION 3. That this ordinance and the various parts thereof are hereby declared to be severable. If any section, sub-section, sentence, clause, word or phrase of this ordinance is, for any reason, held to be unconstitutional, such holdings shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance. SECTION 4. Any person found guilty of violating any provision of this code shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine of not to exceed one thousand dollars or by imprisonment. Each day that a violation continues shall be a separate offense punishable as hereinabove described. ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-20 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this 7th day of April, 1999. Paul H. Loomis,Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Daniel L. Dudley, Town Attorney . .... E _ ,.hannon.Road , • .....,.. . Qh) ..,,...,..... . .. . ....,.:.- , . . . ft. • ..,,,,.'„„. .;. ' •.: .. .....::: ..,. , , ,., . -........S..-,.. ,.:J.:.........:.",..', ..::: . ' ..,:i. ....,'•••••• 7:3 ' . ..:-..:......,:t•...4.'"..7,2,,,,_,•-,..••...r..:, .:.-•,..,..'..., ,...:;,;47;;;:ii. .0'......,...:;:,..,.•;•.,A.:: :.i.t.,',..10A1.,-4,:;',1.-;:-...,:"'``'•• ...••.•_.*-.......:,...: .-.,-,.:•:-f-,'',.:t 4..."'.'7:•.--;,'.,..'..:',..'''''.,'.....•.;•.',..• •-:.......iiI.,-....... ••••".•.',.•• -r.;•...:... :::".r.,;:..,-..,,..',."';. '.7.....4..'',..:.:;•....•;:...:....%:t.,..,,,,,,,I,;,-;,,,..;;;,.::.:.:,,,,,:...rn,":44W..,,..,-;;;,,,,ik.,,,.:,:.,,,,.....,,.......,....,„..,.. .7 ',....„'..L,'• :-T.''7,;:,'..'••.-; ••::...,,.;-....,,..,„;,:'..-.;,..-;:i:.',i..:-,..,;......,.,.... .-,........,,,,,,,..f.,..•,....• ....-•-,,-•••-- .•••:;•:.?.1.:,i,.';:‘,4,,,,•',""::-,. ,..-.-.F.•:7.4,;',.", '-1:.:',..,..-.7.;.,,,,,?.',..e.',.e.,.,:::,:-....::k.......;,i4,,,j1i,r.t.,,,,..,,,,,,,::•,,-........;.7-,-:-..., ,-•-•_A,-. .........s.:0,,,,::,,....:.:•........:,.:,....„,........2...:..,..• ...: .........,,.....,., . (sk) ::::),...-„.•,,,,:,:•44-z;;,4.,.''':-•:-:::::',.•.;;;;;;',. .::•,:;-5;';',2,..02.44k•..;.... :::',..;ii..Frif,,:taliel;' ,..f; ,' ...:-.......---:-..-..7,: -S.'- - "..4g4Z**e..,,fitir.:-. .b'.7.' -4'!:-.1iic---7,7,,,77 , t91,x,,,.:a.,,,,-444%, -0-x,t4-t•-,-,---.--- ,--7....s....-....;::::..::: -S Jt--411s •'.1,a•,••...4it.P4.,-,,A%f"..4,;...!,7%.-,.,,r1;.,,:4.!.,%0,‘k,';',.:4,W%r7,_7%.,,.A.,..44.:•••"14•.''.•,:4;,;':t,•'.!*'',:t1.,...;.......,.M-'i4in,k:';-'*''-,.,.'i,4,.),Z;.:,:;..C':.....,'-:::'::';';'4'',','=,41.'44''4.'4,.;1114'71;,-:'":'';,'4p''4:.;.::,'.:e,:A,.1:4;4,.....4..l..ke41;;e:44°i.tSk'.41t:f4.:f4••• ,f ,.,...",. :: ...-.-.:*4tit',°,,;7::';•:''''''%4.,,..I.,,.,..',..'Y,','..'.:7,.-•<--.44,.I:1,i::••,,.•;.,.•-a.:.:-.-,,,;,.,,,-,;;•,;;:.-•--:3t••r.:,.-:4•.,-..1..-.,1.r 4-.-.;7:,•'•..,.i;.-.•:3:.,„•',"..t,-i:,•.f•.!:•=••••.,,•.vz , , 7 N H4 $'. i, Wt; ' .% .-:::s,-.::,,•,,:••••-',,,s•.”...,::.:•.,.'.„,!.7,,...-..;,..7.,..,-.;•/.:,..,/:.,?.:.;'..,i.. :.'.',.4......,...:''..• ..!, -.:.. aH• • ..1.:',,,,t.',....:2,4,4.,..,..4.....-..,..--7,: _...., 1/4)#..i..,,, -,.........e..M.,,,,Z,V,,t,,,,,...?4,,..,...,-,2,,,,..,,vit..4....*,,,•••• '...„..„.•'. .• V A.,'47 '''''''*,2,,,,,:',:'-'5V;4,",%t.""4'r4"7.%t.;• •--:::'-', •-:. -'-4,,"'.'''''''''..'..','POV':,r,g,,!044. ,•::',.:',..';',54-,...,..,!:,,,,,...-•;.,. - :*...-,','•••• ' iiil •-g•';';',;•'',.........-•m••'•;',774?-Zef4VT;46' 4r .44.,.".':..,7:;,•!, ,,i,,fr„,.. .4 .,.1.;:..:,.,..,4;• -..I0.,%0..,.,.'4.•.,,•.;,:.'1:•:7;,,,;..7..74, - A4;.„,; ---s:-i ..::.• "---,,,.::t--..r,::i.,:-:.;•:.,,-.-.r:7.s-.. --.,-;„Zi.,;.:1,:41:.f:•4,:`•',•••-,•.:"1 ,, e „ a , (.0,.,,:,-?:-•-:-.4,:•,4;'7i4•757,t;,.,.,•;.t,r,-,Lk;,4;.4;;,-i.4i.4-i:i.4,.•.,,•,,:,•,,;':,•:,.;,,;";:':;,-mt'•--.,-,.,"..:.•>•.:,'..-,:..,:%.;:.,:.7.f,.,..-.,.:.:..-.-..., ....:-.- , ;45(0m . . r -. . : 0g44; 4, 144, ±t : ...m.i) , v.f..."-,-'.,t:Pir... ,,,t,',7e2. •74...71'.tr...%,":,.:.`77!...1f,'5.:•:•,,...•••.,,:•...,,•,,....:cjir...,::;..,.:‘....-,::::..H.,:;:,,,:.;„,,,,,..--,,,,....,:,..,..,,,.:.,..:,+4.i..t.,:;,,E.,,,,.. .. ......4:i.;!,"4......,v,.....;,44,#i*().)-.-,,.....;', ,:-,,........,-„:..,,,,.....,..74. i , :...:...L:;:i.:':.---t------:,...,..--....... .:.,..:.;35:-: , .kf..; ,t:-.,...;.4;:i.....--7.' ,j: . '--..,..-',: Cl) ,.t,.,,,-,. ...,;,,,;.,..,,,:,,,..;,-,:.,,.::- '..--1..i.,-,-4,..,4KiFFI:?..i,...ileAtf;,....,(::' - -:-..-7-'.- ' .'.....'::: :,..44.i....-,,,;.4._ iitti,..A.,:i.,4,4'4::...7,,,,,..;;:,:',..::::-7: ..:::,t;.7,,F........:... .,....,>;•,,... .:7`...,4•.(4,,4,;,•11•,,,,-„4.1,;•,,,,, •••- 2 •••:-:,•;” •••••':,•.,.:.:,-' •:•,;,,•••,;:i1;,..4:::::$4,,,7,1•;:licl,4"tilt".:5:F7r-lt.;:z,''...';',..•.'•:•••• :1 " " s) 52.) .g, lta:..4;,., ..,;,.....,..,",,j,,,.4,,,,,', .'.e.-.,-.•.,:,'7' ;/?,:,?:'%.:;.,'-.",..fr;-", .:...'.-q:zi.,.'. ...t..'...:.';:, :'.'.1,;.,=,;,:.',,;%:-.4,......-.,,,,,.;'•:7'.•:', ..tt;',..ii. :4,.,:<;::::::;•,.;:: ,-.. -''- '..•' • ''':.'.,..'.......si:•,: -..'•.,•_:,,,,,..,,,••• •,::+.:,-,,..,..,..,.:. :::: -:..•••• • .:.*1,...' . '-‘"-'''''''....' -"--- "'---"".-"'.--7'-'':'''''''''..1.t.l.';'''', .:1.:,t'::".'r7.:::. ..'::, •_:•;::-''' .: ';:-. ...4',.::':',..q;•t,::-.:•••,....;'.:2....;',*''.•..'4.f:..:',.',.-:'',.. ,:',..,..:....'••'''.•'.-. '''.7'.l•-•-•..' . . ......,....,....,...,,,.;,-..::-.':;,...;4.•••,',.:;77;.:•'-,..'..,.. :;:.'-::::::::.....,,:,..•, ,3:.....,•••7- - -.....-.•CI -7...-,...,!::'..:..1..4.,..,.....-.----4-.--..— -.. -. , • "'"?. ''''• ' -''....--,,•.-,-,...V.',5.:,,,...,,....,....,:..,...::.......,,,.-.7-.-= •• =MINI II -..''...7::::;e.•:'''.,,,,:....."-:,7‘.. .'-:,........:,.:.-.--...1.:,,,,:.,:„....,,,,;,;:4,.:,,„ikY;;;,:.].,'::...i,,;:;,.:•.:,...,,,,:';;:i''',.....,...::.':........).7 •.;;-::::::"-7...'.--71:;•7-'7..,;.•••-•,..--.--'-'''.'...''''.:-.'.•••,-,'.::-:*;:::!'.7*.e5'..477 ...:''..,..'....7::::7',..::,:-.•-•- r-t. N..) •. • ., •*.•.....*:,,,:"•,,,,,,,,,,:,,,,,,,,•,......,444,:•„:: ---,•,,:,. ..i:t..-..-•::•'••-(I.< ''' 7.:0) " 2 -. ..:.....r,-,, .-'••••,;•-•,*•••:'•':.';,'/,'::„...7::„.••••:,.-.'•‘ '...`„ •:'•.•_.•.• :v.':..--,-;•:'.'''.-•••-•-••••-.-":::*.;:-7.-:""....,•,:,...;::.,:•,,..•:•-;„,,',-.•-•,;::.'„::,.-.::: ••,••,:••••••••••••,••:,..:,,,.-::;:z•-•• = ... .• ,.•... ._ . . •• . •• . .....„.,.. ... .. .„ . ... . .. .... . ... ••• . . '.'- :;.-•:-..',,„ ..:,.:;,••—•:.••:1,..v.-•-...:.,::::,,••••••-,.,••••-• •••••••,:,,:,-.,,,,•-•-•Cf) . ''''-a) .-...••••r\.) •: -''''''''''. ''.-' •"•- . ,,...•...:..;,,.;.•:-..,--2.,.,:-2!;,.%,.,..-.,--,-....7•••z'..7":1-777,',:-17,--•47.:04', ..-,',''''4'"--"•'::•••••''s"'''''''7..) •::""•-'"-' --,---,'''' 7.-:".'---•-••,,- • - • - 1\.) Q.) •••-•• • • -,,. -',„,,,,,,,:::,,,..7„.,,,4,,,,:,,,,,,,;;;,:?4,,,,,-.:,.,:----• -,..„,...-..;,,,,,,,..,. ...,,,,,,,,,•-•:,4•,..--,•.,.,- , ,..... ,. ........., . .... . . ..:....., .,,,..•:.• .,.: •••, • ,........„..,••• •,,, • , . „ ..,.....„„••.....,-......., ••_ • .,- • • _ „........„.,••,,,,, . - ..,....„..„. . , . . • . „,... _ , . .,. .• .., ,•,..• - - .. „.„ . •-•....,...••., - ••••:. . ,. ' 0 ' - . -- - .'''.. -• '..'. ..'..-.''''''''.'-......''' .•-•'•:.'. .. c . . ...................,,••..•....... .....,.............. , , .. . , , ••••. ,, ...:. . ... •. .......•,.. , , • .. •• •.. ..... ...,•••••• .••••••.,..:•. .,.... ... ..... .. •.....:....,......... • , . •• .. .. ... : . • . .. . . . .... . . ...,....:...:......,:_.,....,.. ...: ,......,. ..•.............. .. •." .: . . . .... .. .. .... . . . .:.... .....:..:„. ..:. . ...: •.. .. , •.,. . 0 _ .-_._: 0.) .- .-,...,....:•-,.:.::.,..,..,„• :,.T..::::: •,..:-... = • . •• . ...•..........,.....•. • :•„. ,.... , .. . .,. ,... • ... . •. ......•• . ....., . • ... ,.... • ... ,. • •. .,..... ......• ... _ ..••.•.., . , ....... .. .. ... . ... . . .... .. ... . . .... .............: ...„,.• ,..... ...„..... . .. . ... ••• , .. . _. • .. . ...i.,...,..„.,:,..„::..,..„,,,T,... _..7.. . , .,.,..... ..,..,..: i: ,...... . . . v....• • -.....- •. . . .... . ...... ... . . •. ••: ' CD ..ix4,...._ ,. ....) .....- . . -, ,,, . ..,.....:.....:.:„.:... . . . ..„ . . ;..................,-.-:,, :. , ,:.-..'..;.,_.-.::-.:,::::::.''.--..,!:.-...,,:,..,.:.;:.;;.....::,,.............. !.....• (C . • ...... .. . . . .. . - - '..... .: ..... . . .., :,......i:::... , .,....":-•'.':•'!'7: :--7'.'"'"7:7!,V17...Z,.tV.:;,.4,,i.,:b .•.,...,-.;• . - - ' • •'''' ''':- ' --:'''"'''''''''''''''''''--..'...: ' (ri) C) ••••,':'''''>,,'-:-4r,;..'....7..'..:':;F•''I1Y*:,'''t::''''-:','::...:,•-:•-•-•;::---;:°:.'?±,4'4,77.•?-1:',,ttl.',r,77:::::•' .,: :- - ,-•...,....-- -4::::.::._. .....,: .,.s•-....•,:,...........,..,...... ... "", . .. ..... .. . .. .,. . . •. .. .•...-• -:: ,•........ — l• • ..-..:...-: . . : .- • .. .7.,',..,....•.:;:::::J...,',:;.'„f..,‘.%I..,:.=,...,...:.: ......1. .- .............. . . . .::.... „, .... .:: 3 ..•.. .•.....„.•....-..,...:<.• .. --., i , -:- ..•„, ..,.••,-,••,..''..• '.' -.....,...,..'I.:....-, .I','...'...'"'...:Eit.....'•,Z .7.:,..:.:''..':.:......''...::::::... --I :::•-•...--...-..:....-.....,...::;:::<•,-;‘„:±':;,.....:._;•..:, ••.-:':,:i7.7::. ..:".=':',.•...-.7.' ..... :::' :'''.. 0 0 i i.'..:. ..,_..,,.;„. <:••,- ..-,...-'....::•••'..... :- :'"''-'''''''' ---..-7:::::',..,.........-......_-.-- •::•.,...„..,..i....H.,...,7,.-,..........-.- •. . ,-...-,..-..... 1 1 i . • ,..• .-•-....,••• -•.,-....: . . ., ,v v. . . .... .... . . . . . . , , . •-....., -... . . ....•,..-::::".2:::;z:::,Z:::::,....-.4,........-:::,; ...-. ,:. :7. . ,,-,,,..-.::!...:,........,:.:•-•••.•::''. .- ,-...‘-'-- :::.:.-1-‘, ' . ' ....... 1 ! .. •'-••..'......-:,':..:'.7:::.,,,'.'-4.-y•-•::•...-...7 1.,;.., ,......;:..--..7.-.,•.,.-',..,;.:..4,...,.,,,, f.:".:N'!.-,;..,. ‘"•::',.. • .••-'• •*-A.-••••-•: -„ .-"-: ":''''. - . . t 1,,,,....r. l'T..:';'•.i.-,••::;:z'.'i:..;i'.:1':,.4,"'.::;:.'Hf.:::..:' "!:.::l::-:';"':4:''..'is,..'';:::'.:7i.H;'-:',7-•Z''IS'',•:P°•'..Y.:iMt'''' .;,..,.':'Pt':''•.:"..',.,f7,-;:':::?,.7'...-. ''.---''.',..'.:•.-..***''''''.. '1.::::.4.7..;!-'-',:',:.T.:-::,''':::7-..:1:.7-'1.-::::•:"-','•'''''''''''....i-•:'-: ''..."....1..: ; i .• .-....,...,,,,•••,.,,,-:-. :,..t;,:ic.,,...;•.:,..,,,,-'-'..,v.,..-..,.......;. .7.".•.?..-z,".•.:.;,.!::,4,44,°':,-,.7...7f,-,•:7::.,•-•..7'2,•:. •...•.....„. ..... - :-.:•,";.-.'......,'....,...:.::',.......-.::..-- '..-:•'..,-•-:'..•-..-'.....:-.--7.7.''• •. '•-.-- I i ..' ."...---.'''''''':.. '•--.....-.',...,,,,',„e:'"•::,*:"..,1*,',.!'w.v.,,I,-,:T.•, -,-,,,,--,•..:: - . -.. . •,,-.-:,...,-...:•.......,..:.,...,..,,...,,,,.,.,-, ..—, ,. ..,.-:,, , 1 • C :,, -.....-.,•:t.,.-,,•. •;'.:,:•'...e.'.4.•:ci,:i:;:......-7.'•',.!,.',.....•.:.:,i.i4:,,,.:4;„lt.Ig4t,se.-,b-::;.p,i.... •,--.:.;.....,;:-.',.'..:•,-•••:,:•••••••••-.4„,:.-•-•:••t••,•i-,:'1,..r.:<.:••••t?.:;;•:i*•:•::i.,-.',.::••::•-•::.7''':••:,. .'"--'•':-.,.•'" n —1 •:,•72.;.,•,„•;,.2,.i4.3:44.#11..1.V•:!.t,i.•i'•1.....,.77.i.'. 3•1!'iL`4V,...4•V41•Itr ,t.'''''• '•'• '--• . f .• ' ...' : ;:•.-.."'.'....): '-f.":''''''''''''''''''''''-' -'.:.' -- :*'..'•'",-.7,1t"...--:, •..,,.:.‘,,•-••••,,'_......• -1,,,..w...4,...,,,„“,,,,::::',',..4.,.0... .-.:....,:.,;,...L. --.7,---_,,--........,••.,..::'.:•••:-;,......•.:::::,',::'4,,',.;..:-:::.t.:,,As•i4'6f,t,,,,,,,,,:s.-.;,-,'.%,',",.'.:. ' - r ..e:':;;;;;!!••:',...Z,r,,,:,,...4:.::::...,,,,,,,••••,..:....2',..,,,,,,,,,,i,',41,,,,,.01, 1,;•,,,,,,....,,,,,,.:,:•'7:::'.,::: ......7'--::,...--.,,,..'''',.,•;••' .'';'..-; .•'''''•''''•••:":7;:"..:"..' .;:::-,,-.• :. ' amisme —13 I ::.... ..::::::.'::':: :..4:17-54t4t.".2:::il':7. ..4fr:::;f;27;.1: :::".i.4?..0.?....11:::: :'?.:.. .:J':..;,:.'''''''':. '.--7- 1 •'.:....... .•-i....:"..,...-,I • ,...,-.,.•:::::•.,.....-..:-..:::H.;,: ..s...: s, . ,.. 1f/U -d r .- '':;".:.:.",,...,,,,.:'•._,_.::.•...,'....'7............:.-,.• , •,,•-. :.......4.-:•:',:".::: :;::ii.,...,.;',1.::: s-.... -. . .- - .-7.:..:...7:r..- i.:'-.,I. ",'.,-,:2,.:•.:'''..•.' ' ...- ':'•.. • ' C. 1 •• : •...... •,:::::::',-4;.Y.1.177.-:.- .'''',.....,;7',.;':,-s...',..'''.'...":;.:..7.:.;..'...]:',.11'.,1'.,--.:.iV...:•:::'?,.''..,,,,,:,s::.'..' ....':-- _-. '"'•,..-"-7.:...•:.. -...7 .;•,,.:''.......rj::.. , ' -.-:, '• CD I ..'...... ','''';'....',...r........**.Yn.••'...:;-:.• .:.7!%1•.........';',Er'`..,1'.'...i:*(:.:Y-':''':ir...,.,'.::1:...:,.••:.:.. --':-":.'''.. ' - . ".•:.,.-•,•1.;-...,..,-..:1:,..,.-."'',-;..:,*:.•.....:.•,•.',....'' 7...i:-..' .••' •' . r-4-. i i . ..--',:-..-,-;-..:..,-.-,....!.;::;1::',.,.....:-....--,,,::,,,,.i..t.,-;,..,.: sf. .,.,......:.:.,:7...4...7#4.,4t:....!:::t.,,,,..,,,:..:.....-..,:...,:,::..:- ,. .... .. ... .......... . .;„ • ....,. ,s ._..s s 1-- . ,.-:-.- .. - . .:::.:....::::';-,:1.:,::„:•:':;;;,..4F;:',::-.,:.;:...7...:•1:,,: ,.........• . ••-... -•-'.:,;,•-. --.: .:..I•::.;.F::::.A;..-•.-:.,..-,,,.., :,-'- •- .. • .7... z) ,. . ..: ,-;-_-:••.‘,.-.,;',.'.••,:::,:*•..-.,*::,....,..•.-:-.47-7.„,-,.....,:••.„;":,.•-•••,,,:,,.:75....:.,.,:::„:,.. . , • 7 • ::.: :.,., •,, .:: - ...,:' .,.. .••• -.... ,-. ...... ....,.. ..,..,... ,, ........,_........„.• ...:. . 0 1• . :.::•:,:-........„ ... ‘. -. •.....-...- •..., :-..:... • ... , . . . . .. • i • • • :. ., .. . .. . , . ..• . .•. .: ,.. ....•••• .. • , ,....... .. ..,. •.• .. .5 : , • 1 •• •- • .•: • , . • •• ,.• • . . ., -• • ' -, . _ ..:: . : :- :.•.-:, --•.. - , , ..... • • ,: •- - 1 0 . .,.. . .. .••••:, . ... .:.:,::•'..l.: :••::::••••E••.. 2:-. - .1 . 1 . . •,•.• _. , ,.••,..• •• .: .• • . • .• , • . , - • .• . • .., . . .. • , - • , •-.. ,..„:.......,. ........ .. .•,• , ca.) 7 •-::.-......,• •.•:. • .. . .......,.. ..,, . , : • " • , i - . . .. , - •"•' ... •• -••.- .. . . • , - .: • ' - •- I --,. , . . . .I -I-(-110147a Rot-t!.n...fr-Ar (17 4,..a.T ....,...--1, T-77-7.57:77,--: ::1 t.....- 4.--....... • ' ',./...___.-...---. _""*".... : • / 1 Cr . •Ja..' --.......,..,. ' I —4("3•,---• r , ; — . ,...i..........2...„ 'S r ; ."- : 1, 01 -- , . ....'--......,__-,... . ......1 / - 1 ., ., , . 1 1 . -____ ...L. . ,.W-\.: -', ------------------- - s C) •, . .... , . . • • -r- , • 0 , . . , ....,, • ii........„ E,---,;, , • • .\ , \\/= ,, -... . . .. , ....._........ . ....._______. • . . , . i • Nap" • ......._:....: .. - --: .• ..--:- < .....< cif) ..-------.., ,./ .. ,..,,....• ' : .., -., , /, . — ...-. .-- -., . • -. ',, / . / - ' _.• ......-.., , ...., . . TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 7 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: April 7, 1999 i0: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL FROM: Dennis Silva, Jr., Planner I SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING — ORDINANCE (0)99-21 OV9-99-28 PARCEL 224-20-002B, CASAS ADOBES BAPTIST CHURCH, TRANSLATION OF ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY SR TO ORO VALLEY R1-144, LOCATED WEST AND ADJACENT TO CANADA HILLS B & C BACKGROUND: On August 5, 1998, pursuant to Section 9-471B of the Arizona Revised Statutes, the Town of Oro Valley Mayor and Council annexed the parcel owned by the Casas Adobes Baptist Church. The Town is required to change, or "translate", the zoning on the annexed properties from Pima County zoning designations to the closest comparable Oro Valley zoning designation. In accordance with State law, the Town must translate the County zoning by April of 1999. The property is located approximately 1/4 mile south of Naranj a Drive, approximately 1/4 mile north of Lambert Lane, west of La Cholla Boulevard, and approximately 1/2 mile east of Shannon Road. SUMMARY: Tn accordance with State Statutes, the Town should translate Pima County's SR zoning, which allows single family esidential (.3 DUA), to Oro Valley's closest equivalent designation, R1-144, Single Family Residential (also permits .3 DUA). There was no pre-annexation agreement negotiated between the property owner and the Town. The applicant has not submitted a letter requesting additional entitlements, however, they have an approved development plan through Pima County and are currently amending the development plan through the Town of Oro Valley process. These conditions are addressed in Exhibit"A". GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE: The General Plan land use designation for this parcel is Public/Semi Public which complies with the existing use. This designation includes churches,police/fire substations, and hospitals. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION ACTION: On March 2, 1999,the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this translational zoning by a 6 —0 vote. RECOMMENDATION: Planning Staff recommends approval of the translation of zoning for parcel # 224-20-002B in the area known as Map 3, from Pima County SR to Oro Valley R1-144 and all applicable development standards of the R1-144 zoning district shall apply thereto along with the entitlements attached in Exhibit"A". TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 2 ,J UGGESTED MOTION: 1 move to recommend approval of Ordinance (0)9921 , OV9-99-28, translating zoning for parcel # 224- 20-002B in the area known as La Cholla/Tangerine, from Pima County SR to Oro Valley R1-144 and all applicable development standards of the R1-144 zoning district, and the entitlements attached as Exhibit «A» OR I move to recommend approval of Ordinance (0)99-21 , OV9-99-28, translating the zoning for parcel # 224-20- 002B in the area known as La Cholla/Tangerine, from Pima County SR to Oro Valley R1-144, all applicable development standards of the RI-144 zoning district, the entitlements attached as Exhibit "A", and the following added conditions: . ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ordinance (0)99- 21 2. Exhibit"A"—Conditions for Translational Zoning 3. Location Map i i0L P1• i7; d Administrator Zoning I a ' I P Or -� ,�.�1 0 /1 ityDev:. �� • 1 ent Dire tor r '! 1 ' 40 Town Manag,r F:\OV\OV9\1999\9-99-28\TZTC.RPT ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-21 AN ORDINANCE TRANSLATING THE ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY SR TO ORO VALLEY R1-144, WITH CONDITIONS, ON THE PROPERTY KNOWN AS THE CASAS ADOBES BAPTIST CHURCH, LOCATED WITHIN MAP 3, AND REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH. WHEREAS, the owners of certain real property known as the Casas Adobes Baptist Church, located within Map 3,has a development plan previously approved by Pima County, and is currently amending this plan through the Oro Valley process; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, has considered said translational zoning with added conditions on these properties at a duly noticed Public Hearing, in accordance with State Statue, and having made its recommendations to the Town Council; and WHEREAS, the Oro Valley Town Council has duly considered the translational zoning with added conditions at a Public Hearing and finds that it is consistent with the Town's General Plan, Tangerine Corridor Overlay District, and other Town ordinances, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY: SECTION 1. That the Casas Adobes Baptist Church contained within Map 3 be translationally zoned from Pima County SR to Oro Valley R1-144, and that all applicable development standards of the R1-144 zoning district and entitlement conditions shall apply.thereto to said properties. The conditions in Exhibit"A" shall also apply to this property. SECTION 2. That all ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be and the same are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict; SECTION 3. That this ordinance and the various parts thereof are hereby declared to be severable. If any section, sub-section, sentence, clause, word or phrase of this ordinance is,.for any reason, held to be unconstitutional, such holdings shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance. SECTION 4. Any person found guilty of violating any provision of this code shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine of not to exceed one thousand dollars or by imprisonment. Each day that a violation continues shall be a separate offense punishable as hereinabove described. ORDINANCE NO. (0)99- 21 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this 7th day of April, 1999. Paul H. Loomis,Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Daniel L. Dudley, Town Attorney EXHIBIT "A" 0V9-99-28 CONDITIONS FOR TRANSLATIONAL ZONING CASAS ADOBES BAPTIST CHURCH PARCEL #224-20-002B —1. This property has an existing development plan under Pima County. 2. Any additions or amendments to the development plan must be built under Oro Valley standards. . . .....„, ... . ,., ... ..._ Shannon Road J,.....\_ 1/4. (1) I . I ; I > CD I . 1 >-....., C) . ; I 0 . . 1 , , 1 CO 1 . , 1 . i 1 , 1 ! ril Cr) I I • , I , , I 1 i I I i CO 1 . , 7 • 1 ! , I H CD ;• • , H 1 , I I : • • 1 , 1 , , C I ! , , 1 . i • 1 , . , . , i . , 0 . , . . 1 , . 1 . . 1 , , • • 1 . , 1 . . , -77• ,..d ,...... . ., .... -,1 I ..,......_ • .• I ! I ..-. -..,..: .,..,..::::::.4-,-..t•:..,:;', •:";-:•,..::,,'..2, ,,, . . ...1""' ' •-.'"- -.'-:.--.,,:-..--.4 ,--"'....,_, - ...- --: : C ........ ; i i . . • , s • . • , . ., ---:. . o 0 . . ._ L...... . . . . . . ....... , . --ii ......, , , , .„,.• . .. . .a. •..•• • > ..... Cr) 'an .....,........• ,..• • . .. , . .. . ,. , , 7 c-- i 0 , H - . 0 , . 1--- , 0 CD ' 7• 0 < >; • . •• • .. - , ! I . . •• • • , . • , , I -*.- •,-.:..•-•-..,---.-..-'.::.':.-‘,3',' ' ' ri''' .. . —...,... • M . i ••:•.. . .., .. ,..., ,,.,,,.::.,.. . ''''' ,‘.:"'";•'•',1.7^::',".—''' ,si., ;.‘ ...' - i --"< I acholia_Rotati . . /, ; , / •,...4 . -"N, , :• • : ,. 1 ,.....:a. ,/. ,_ . _ , .. / , . • ,--4c,.- , \ /.• , ,. , , 7 ri / ,---r---,.......--'----4---------, . • , , , v.= • , 1 •:D--- . • • , /r •, . . ' • j,,..,----eD i • , ,, ,./1• ,, \ ‘ i ; • C.7 -'--'-'-'''',- • i ; I IP 1 ' . \ --..._ • :..: ---- C . . 1 ' I I ,. t • \ Ila , . I ' 4 t. .• ' . , g,..1.....,:l.......... .,./ :, -,,,;"KL..---....„,....s........._(7.....s...................___.__ 1---------------7 ! ; i . , iN. ,,z,..'4 .,'/..''' '-'.----•'•:-..--....----a". lk‘ , ......... ." ....... ', , ,.... Mayor Loomis & Commissioners April 7, 1999 RE: Springboard Home Thank you for giving me the opportunity to speak again. I wish to discuss three points: Number one: 1) Individuals (letters) for and against the proposed home A) We have two piles of letters, one weighs much more than the other as it represents the neighbors close to the proposed facility who will be most affected by it. B) The neighbors who are affected will definitely have their property values lowered because anything that affects whether or not a buyer will buy must be disclosed on the `Sellers Disclosure Statement.' Since the neighbors are upset and oppose the Springboard Home, so will perspective buyers. Mr. Allbright has attached the `Sellers Disclosure Form' to his letter for your review. I hope you had time to read his letter and the form. C) I hope that your Staff will be pointing out to you which letters that came in are from the nearby neighbors and which are not. D) The neighbors fears of what may happen when you have abused/runaway girls in a home, were confirmed when they read a copy of the police report obtained by Mr. Allbright. To quote an excerpt from Mrs. Starks' letter "I have two school age children. As evidenced by the attached police report by the Tucson Police Dept., the Assembly of God Church's current facility has had several encounters with the police. This report only confirms my fears. I feel this facility would put my children at risk." E) Many of the parents of Wilson School children have expressed their fears and concerns to us and have signed the new petition, which strictly opposes the Springboard Home and has nothing to do with grading of the property. The `home' is proposing to locate right around the corner from an elementary school; many of us believe this will be an appealing place for runaways to hide by mingling with young children. Many are concerned about vandalism. Number two: 2) The 100% in favor Planning and Zoning Commission vote A) I live 57 feet from where the proposed facility would be located and my husband and I did not find out about the request for the conditional use permit until the night after the P &Z Commission met and voted for it, because we never received our notice. I phoned David Marsh immediately upon learning about it and he checked the records and it showed a notice was mailed -2- to us. Unfortunately we didn't get it. If we had received it, we could have voiced our concerns at the P &Z meeting. WE BELIEVE THE VOTE WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN 6-0. Number three: 3) A couple of points about the police report: A) Mr. Allbrights' second letter to you reflects what would happen when you take the statistics,which include aggravated assault, auto theft, disorderly conduct, disturbing the peace, runaways and more. It changes from 20 incidents over 2 years to approximately 36 emergency and police 911 calls every year. That sounds like more than one every other week. This type of alarm in our neighborhood interferes with the lifestyle we are entitled to one of peace and harmony. Helicopters &police at our doors looking for runaways, police and ambulance sirens create havoc in our lives. B) If all incidents mentioned in the police report happened on the premises, it would still mean an interference in our lives with the police and helicopters. C) ALL incidents that happened at or near 'the home' are most probably not reported. We moved here to retire. We do not wish to put up fences and gates to keep our neighbors out. We enjoy seeing the coyotes run free across our property and hope it continues. PLEASE LISTEN TO THE NEIGHBORS WE ALL OPPOSE THIS HOME IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. Neighbors are here tonight. THANK YOU JK Mayor Loomis & Council Members 4/7/99 RE: 0V8-99-2 I. Springboard Letter (To Petition Signers) Purpose "To hopefully relieve any fears you may have regarding the nature and operation of Springboard" A.We are told " Springboard is not a residence for criminal offenders or a residence which provides drug and/or alcohol rehabilitation. 1.Review by Chief Wolff a. 1-08-98 Runaway Juvenile age 15 alcohol abuser ran away from the facility. b. 3-09-99 Runaway juvenile age 13 chronic runaway (alcohol&drug abuser) ran away and was found. B. We are told "Any youth arrested for criminal offenses cannot be accepted by Springboard,but are placed in the Juvenile Detention Center. 1. Review by Chief Wolff a. 4-8-97 Runaway Juvenile/ Stolen vehicle. b. 3-04-98 Two juveniles ages 14& 15 attacked a 55 year old female caretaker at facility. Spraying her with a fire extinguisher and striking her head with a skillet. c. 3-23-98 Juvenile with history of violent outbursts arrested, and taken to juvenile detention. d. 6-07-98 Juvenile (possible suicide) causing disturbance for several hours. Juvenile was on rooftop. Probation officer could not be reached. How do you have a probation officer without an arrest record? C. We are told "DES further requires that Springboard not provide shelter to youth who are a danger to themselves or others,withdrawing from substance abuse,or those who are unwilling to sign an agreement to abide by the shelters rules. • idry J Ittodikk •••• ••• • 1. Review by Chief Wolff a. 11-20-97 Mental case.Juvenile age 17 threatening suicide. b. 1-08-98 Marijuana/ alcohol abuser. c. 3-04-98 Two juveniles attacking 55 year old caretaker with a skillet. d. 6-07-98 Possible suicidal causing disturbance. e. 10-26-98 Juvenile age 14 grabbed a butcher knife,tried to cut her wrist and stab herself in the stomach. f. 3-9-99 Juvenile age 13,chronic runaway,alcohol,and drug abuser. ***I do understand that all of these occurrences are not technically "criminal cases ", however;they are criminal in nature, and did happen. 2. QUESTIONS 1. What will happen when one of these youths flees the Shelter (common occurrence),and runs several hundred feet to my home where my wife and children are,while I'm at work?Are you willing to assure me that this facility is not a threat to my families safety. Let's be realistic about this!! 2.Does Oro Valley have the trained staff to respond to ongoing suicide attempts, mentally ill patients,and violent teens? 3. Who will monitor that this facility doesn't decide to become a coed facility,or a facility of some other nature. Once established it will be under the control of the church and DES. Oro Valley and the community will have little control? tic 4. Will this facility vmo, will accept youths from all over Tucson,and possibly even Phoenix on occasion,be a benefit to our community and families. It is not a local ministry! II. STAFF REPORT. A. "Did not affect neighboring properties". a.What about emergency units responding? b. The troubled suicidal youth on the roof,causing a disturbance for several hours? • 2 .;. 0,1K c. What about the youths who fled the home on 01-08-98,3-04-98, 6-27-98, 2-12-99, 3-04-99, 3-9-99. d. I would like to read the incident on 3-04-98. *** I have a one year old girl, a five year old boy,and a wife. Should I have to go to work everyday worried for their safety? B. Staff recommends that two Springboard Staff be present at all times. This is a 1-10 ratio. My sons AWANA'S CLUB requires a 1-4 ratio at all times.Are troubled teens easier to control than preschoolers? C. Who will monitor all the Staffs "_Added Conditions ". The fact is, that we will have little control on what goes on there once it is opened. III. CONCLUSION. A. Your Staff Report shows concerns. B. Your Police Chief in his letter stated, " I recommend a denial of the requested conditional use permit". C. MOST IMPORTANTLY WE AS A COMMUNITY DO NOT WANT THIS IN OUR BACKYARDS! PLEASE RESPECT OUR CURRENT ZONING AND WISHES. *****We DO NOT want you to continue this, this is a tactic they're using to prolong this matter. There is enough information available through the Town of Oro Valley's Staff Report, the Police Chiefs recommendation to deny the conditional use permit, and most importantly the communities objection to the location of this facility. I am not against providing shelter for troubled youths, I am against the proposed location. Please honor our wishes, and thank you for your time. .;. 3 .;. 6'4/06/1999 15:43 6676786 rHut ul • t'•\ r • •1) SFr ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC SECURITY DIVISION FOR CHILDREN,YOUTH,AND FAMILIES 717 3,Alvirnon Tucson,AZ 85711 (520) 3114716 Jan*Doe Hull Dr. Linda J. Blessing, DPA GOVERNOR DIRECTOR April 2, 1999 Oro Valley Town Hall 11000 N.La Canada Oro Valley,AZ 85737 Re: Springboard, Inc Dear Mayor at Council Members, I am writing to inform you that Springboard, Inc., currently operates an Emergency Receiving Satellite Home (shelter) in Tucson at 3644 N. Nufer Place. This home is licensed for six (6) children,secs 8.]8 years,and is for females only. Springboard, Inc., is not licensed by D.E.S. to serve as a drug rehabilitation center for children. The childret who are placed at Springboard come from a variety of backgrounds but have typically been abused and)or neglected in some way. Springboard, Inc.. has been providing services to children in Tucson for over 20 years. During that time, Springboard has maintained. execilent relations with their neighbors and with professionals in the community. If you need further information regarding Springboard, or clarification regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact me at 318-9715,Ext. 118, Thank you. Sincerely, ralcja44,9,...9 Fred Sats Community'Child Care Licensing Specialist ,is L tr 2,7 N Sri . �SZc I �Z46-8 TE—I3ZS t ' �T 66�L i7.c i bcA -V.‘ TEEN CHALLENGE SHELTER HOME MINISTRY DONORS WHO LIVE IN ORO VALLEY AND ARE IN FAVOR OF US RECEIVING THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AT THE 4/7/99 PUBLIC HEARING NAME ADDRESS RESPONSE Arnold,Raymond & Katherine In favor PETITION Reference: Case board Facili We the undersigned residences of Oro Valley and nearby neighbors of the referenced property near Tangerine and La Cholla are NOT in favor of Oro Valley giving a conditional use permit to Springboard Home for runaway/abusscgi iLls., WE OPPOSE THIS HOME IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. 1.11 ti f-3/ . ......._-___,...............,............._..... ' :i ,.27 _. VZS Pr Ai' 77, cSoik-fi , (Nz j /,,‘,,i ' g / A. . ..„, _. V3- iff' IF/ CM(5I"), S6C-KION ( " . • * LIO cla, H61,0 )141 0 0 OC1, LP 9. )W- Id '171; PETITION Reference: Case No. OV8-99-2 S 1 rin I board Facilit . We the undersigned residences of Oro Valley and nearby neighbors of the referenced property near Tangerine and La Cholla are NOT in favor of Oro Valley giving a conditional use permit to Springboard Home for runaway/abused girls. WE OPPOSE THIS HOME IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. ..R1A)1 Mitf-to 6 ." AB D R E s-S C 1 r t) Z / SilLA)11-711k5 " A---2 V 1 3 I ci: [/ 1M Ori V4' 76 7 I y4e,#g(Vtyl.__ ( ,/ Ltic/ ,....T. 1/0 ,--\- c.x..„ \\ D 3 . , V- ')--- *---.1 C.—S: 0 iN 'CO "1 S —) s .jrAti 411,010, -----T--- y... 471— — (/ ,_ —)4 t 1/ . — a. .... -- (2,c, In „II__ / -¢ le-' PETITION Ileference: Case No. OV8-99-2,amkighoat_a_ffaajkl We the undersigned residences of Oro Valley and nearby neighbors of the referenced property near Tangerine and La Cholla are NOT in favor of Oro Valley giving a conditional use permit to apjill bg_PATIn _y_________Z-aWa iab d ir1SUSe . WE OPPOSE THiS HOME IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. _AIILL-11/101-E--- AO f S. C Z. S i ii TV ' AT 1 ,,... c-, 4•6.)- ? , , , '(.. -- .6- (3 0 P -7 j .-, /1 J'-{. 1-e ---- K At , •.44 . ,--- Mi 1=•-% 60G.isivi,i ril DV 'N'ti 3r1 1 , itir 0 ' ?S' 1 ILdalii (7 , L-L---- / 7r OF , /- (:-/oz-1 III IIIIIIIIII. _ i1-------- PETITION Reference: Case No. 0V8-99-2 ( pringQIrd FociW.il ro near Tan Brine and La • Oro Valleyand nearby neighbors of the referenced property g We the undersigned res�d�nces of • • r�,xnawa abused �irls. a conditional use ermit to S,r _board Home forcholla are jQJi.in favor of Oro.Valley giving P NEIGHBORHOOD WEOPPOSE THIS HOME IN OUR . ' •?' • �- C . Li/ 40 ii)co) ,4- 1,0 c ,,,ti k ' ---74,0_.s..-.---L . -. -0-si....i Le:- Li, .) Lz, . _______. w.-' ( • 7 i i / i C --7-,' • ''''. ::,;* Zlal--- I: Q ' Li'L-'_/31/1 „„e- : // ,,- .--(, --L___ . .„- ...,__ _. '' 1 Vaikkl,i _____ _____________________.........._ UII ...._. i Apr-07-99 02 : 19P P.01 I-TEm 8 _____, CoER MOUNTAIN , N4"f,./...„.". t- ../..,..-- ' )• • \ -----........L, ASSEMBLY OF GOD , April 7, 1999 Town of Oro Valley Community Development Department ATT: Bryant Nodine, Planning and Zoning Adm. 11000 N.La Canada Drive Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 Subject: OV9-99-21 Parcel#219-22-0140 Arizona District Council of the Assemblies of God Property-Conditional Use Permit for Springboard-Request for Continuance Location of Property: OV9-99-21 Parcel#219-42-0140: NW corner of Tangerine and Como Dear Mr. Nodine: Based upon a meeting this morning with Police Chief Werner Wolff and at his recommendation,we are formally requesting a continuance on the decision on the Conditional Use Permit for the Springboard Home until the Town Hall Meeting which will take place on May 5, 1999_ During our meeting with Chief Wolff,we were able to answer concerns that have been expressed by Oro Valley residents and also speak specifically to the incidents which were itemized in a Tucson Police Department report which covered 04/08/97 to 03/09/99_ A continuance would allow for more of this kind of discussion and study between the Oro Valley Police Department. Town Leadership and Staff,and concerned residents who are willing to participate in the dialogue. Thank you for your thoughtful consideration. Respectfully submitted, se-12.4-- OrS21„:1). '1 .......,_, (1, zi-e-- --- Rev. William T. Seale, Pastor,Copper Mountain Assembly of God, on behalf of The Anzona District Council of the Assemblies of God. Inc. 2009 N. 7th Street Phoenix, Arizona 85006 CC: Chief Werner Wolff Chuck Sweet,Town Manager Mayor Paul Loomis and Town Council William T. Seale, Pastor P.O. Box 65312 Tucson, AZ 85728-5312 (520) 293-9539 Office (520) 8.50-2202 Mobilc TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 8 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: April 7th, 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL FROM: David Marsh, Planner I SUBJECT: ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-22 ,OV8-99-2 COPPER MOUNTAIN ASSEMBLY OF GOD REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ESTABLISH A COMMUNITY SERVICE AGENCY FOR SPRINGBOARD, A TEMPORARY SHELTER FOR ABUSED,ADOLESCENT WOMEN TO BE LOCATED AT THE COPPER MOUNTAIN ASSEMBLY OF GOD, ON THE NORTH SIDE OF TANGERINE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY V4 MILE WEST OF LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD. BACKGROUND: Copper Mountain Assembly of God is requesting a conditional use permit for the proposed Springboard residence, a temporary shelter for a maximum of 20 abused, adolescent women and supervisory staff. The Springboard residence will consist of several bunk bed rooms, a kitchen, dining room, living room, and several offices for counseling purposes. lie project will be located on the northern portion of the Copper Mountain Assembly of God property, and if approved, will be built in conjunction with the church and recreational facilities on site. The site itself is located at the corner of Tangerine Road and Como Drive, on the north side of Tangerine approximately 1/2 mile west of La Cholla Boulevard. NATURE OF REQUEST: The CUP application before the Council this evening is an unusual one, as there are no provisions for a `community service agency' under the OVZCR. The origins of this request are part of the translational zoning process for the Copper Mountain Assembly of God property. As a condition of approval of the translational zoning of this property, the applicant was granted by the right to apply for this CUP, which is permitted under Pima County. While the OVZCR has no definition of`community service agency', the Pima County Zoning Code defines the term to mean : "an organization such as an orphanage, home for the aged, YMCA, Boy Scouts, CYO, YMHA, Campfire Girls, or any similar organization organized as a non-profit corporation or supported in whole or in part by public subscription and primarily established to serve the social and welfare needs of the community or any part thereof, and not organized for the personal profit of any individual, group of individuals, or corporation." SURROUNDING LAND USE: fhe subject property is located on the north side of Tangerine Road, approximately V2 mile west of La Cholla Boulevard. It is bounded on the west, north, and south by SR/ R1-144 low density residential, and on the east by the Church of the Apostles property, a proposed church use. Tangerine Road borders the southern property line. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 4 COMPLIANCE WITH ARTICLE 3-2 USE PERMITS Use permits may be granted when the determination has been made that the granting of such conditional use permit will not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare. In arriving at this determination, the factors to be considered shall include the following: 1. Damage or nuisance arising from noise, smoke, odor, dust,vibration or illumination; 2. Hazard to persons and property from possible explosion, contamination, fire or flood; 3. Hazard occasioned by unusual volume or character of traffic. The first factor is generally not applicable to this type of use. Although it is possible that the Springboard residence may generate more noise than the typical rural residential properties surrounding it, it is highly unlikely given the clientele of the shelter, on-site supervisors, and the nature of the activities on site. Neighbors of the existing Springboard facility have reported no noise nuisance incidents, and a member of the Tucson Police Department responsible for the area has stated to Staff that they have had no negative reports about the facility. Moreover, there will also be a minimum 40' natural landscape buffer between the residence and the adjoining property to the north. The second factor is not applicable to this use. Regarding the third factor, traffic volume and character are not expected to change from the proposed church use for the property. Parking will be provided for the shelter, and the number of vehicles entering, exiting and parking will not significantly increase from those of the proposed church use. In addition, the characteristics of the proposed use must be reasonably compatible with the types of use permitted in the surrounding area. It is the opinion of Staff, given the nature of the facility and its limited size, that the proposed shelter is reasonably compatible with the surrounding rural residential properties. Three property owners who reside immediately adjacent to the existing Springboard facility in Tucson have stated to Staff that the facility has not had a negative impact on the neighborhood. Moreover, the proposed facility will be limited to a maximum of twenty residents. GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE: The current, adopted General Plan Land Use Map designates this property as rural low density residential (0.0 — 0.3 Dwelling Units per Acre), an area where single family detached residential development in a rural manner is appropriate. While the proposed use is not a residential one, and thus not in conformance with the General Plan, the relatively low impact of the activities of the Springboard residence should not be in conflict with the rural character of the area. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENT: All property owners within 600 feet of the site were notified of this public hearing. On March 6th, Staff has received a petition of protest with 29 signatures from property owners in the area. The petition dealt with two separate issues: opposition to the Springboard CUP, and the increased grading limits proposed as a condition of the TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 3 of 4 translational zoning for this property. It is difficult to ascertain if the signatories of the petition were expressing opposition to the CUP, or the increased grading limits, or both issues. A neighborhood meeting was held by the applicant and Staff on March 25th at Town Hall in an effort to respond to the neighbor's concerns. Of the 16 persons who attended the meeting, only three were from neighboring properties. It is important to note that the Klingler and Bennet families, the principle authors of the petition, stated publicly at the translational zoning hearing for this property that they would not attend the March 25th neighborhood meeting. Staff has also received eight letters of support, and four letters against, at the time of preparing this report. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ACTION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (6—0)with conditions. RECOMMENDATION: Staff has reviewed the request for conditional use permit for compliance with Article 3-2, Use Permits, and we recommend approval, subject to those conditions attached herewith as Exhibit A. SUGGESTED MOTION: move to approve Ordinance No. (0)99-22 , OV8-99-2, Copper Mountain Assembly of God Community Service Agency Conditional Use Permit with the conditions listed in Exhibit A, attached herewith. OR I move to approve Ordinace No. (0)99-22 , OV8-99-2, Copper Mountain Assembly of God Community Service Agency Conditional Use Permit with the conditions listed in Exhibit A, attached herewith, and the following added conditions: OR I move to deny Ordinance No. (0)99- 22 , OV8-99-2, Copper Mountain Assembly of God Community Service Agency Conditional Use Permit, finding that TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 4 of 4 ATTACHMENTS: t. Ordinace No. (0)99-22 . 2. Exhibit A—Conditions for Approval 3. Concept Site Plan and Location Map 4. Applicant's Narrative 5. Petition of Protest 6. Neighborhood Meeting Letter from Applicant 7. Sample Letter in Support of Request 8. Letter in Opposition to Request . qoat g and Zoning Administiator 4., • Community De p = t 1'irector / / a anager \\OV PZD\PZ 1\OV\OVCASES\8-99-2\CUPTC.RPT.doc ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-22 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, RELATING TO ADOPTION OF A OV8-99-02 COPPER MOUNTAIN ASSEMBLY OF GOD REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ESTABLISH SPRINGBOARD, A TEMPORARY SHELTER FOR ABUSED, ADOLESCENT WOMEN AND FIXING THE EFFECTIVE DATE THEREOF; PRESERVING RIGHTS AND DUTIES THAT HAVE ALREADY BEEN ASSURED AND PROCEEDINGS THAT HAVE ALREADY BEGUN THEREUNDER. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY: WHEREAS, the Town of Oro Valley permitted the Copper Mountain Assembly of God to apply for a conditional use permit for Springboard under the conditions of approval for the property's translational zoning, OV9-99-21; and WHEREAS, it has become necessary to adopt a Conditional Use Permit to allow for Springboard, a temporary shelter for abused, adolescent women; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, having considered said Use Permit; and having held a public hearing on March 2', 1999; and having made its recommendations to the Town Council; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY: SECTION 1. The Council hereby adopts (0)99 -22 and conditions of Exhibit A. Three copies of the Conditional Use Permit are on file in the office of the Town Clerk of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona. SECTION 2. The effective date of the Conditional Use Permit shall be thirty days after the adoption of this ordinance by the Town Council. SECTION 3. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of the ordinance or any part of the Conditional Use Permit adopted herein is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. 1 SECTION 4. That all ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be repealed to the extent of such conflict. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this 7th day of April, 1999. Paul H. Loomis, Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Dan Dudley, Town Attorney F:\OV\OVCASES\8-99-2\CUP.ORD.doc 2 EXHIBIT "A" OV8-99-2 CONDITIONS FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPROVAL COPPER MOUNTAIN ASSEMBLY OF GOD / SPRINGBOARD COMMUNITY SERVICE AGENCY 1. All structures to constructed for the operation of the Springboard residence shall comply with the R1-144 regulations for accessory buildings. 2. The number of beds in the facility shall be limited to a maximum of twenty (20). .. ..... ... . •. .., ,.. . .x., k , .__.__.__.___Ep 0, N $ _ s I O I 40 NATURALNATURALLANDSGAPE I k , , , \\\\,, _ -i---1, \ \ q. , , \ .! -: { \�4 , , . i, < \\ ° \- '93 SPACES s q'-0•eA I° l 62'-o. \\\\\\\N 1 � ,„; 0.. 2 I i X,h, : ` -041 I 24 SPAGES•ci'-O"Eh. 111 JL\\\11 C--)' iii 0 NNI. 1 19.„ , ,,,,,,i,u, rn I S I' k : k:: '� `` ° O \ Q 1 \ \ \ 1 i p�_p• '. \\\\\\\\\N ..\\\\\\\ 10> § ! I 1 - j g24 SPADES e 4-0' A. I it ill 1 N . ----- 54 SF'AGPS•q'-0'RA. ? ;44 l r t= ' _ I 40.O. I O I � I � i 4 rn➢1TI B� I rn o 1Z i 1 1 ti la I S I � i I I _ _ ` , 0 40'NATURAL LAMDSOAPE 6---' - --- _____ ____ 0 ... r_ NVih,,,qh, 1414C w--- _ . _ ___-‘,X-.:Nlat*--- - 'ea\ 1...._____>---M--<-------- Its J , Rt i N 3 11111 i M Mil poi o Li . .-.c., s = Z r- g I I.; . ""'14 COPPER MOUNTAIN . . N.,... . r",,,,,,,,,. )-1.. : ,.. -: , . -, --. ....:<::,:-..7.‘ . . . „.. ... . . . . . . ... . -+ ASSEMBLY OF GOD January 11, 1999 Mr. Donald Chatfield, AICP Community Development Director Town of Oro Valley 11000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 Subject: Copper Mountain Church Development- Application for Conditional Use Permit Location of Property: the Southeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 33, T11 S, R13E, of the Gila and Salt River Meridian in Pima County, Arizona. Dear Mr.Chatfield: In lieu of the upcoming translating and rezoning of this 10 acre property from Pima County SR to Oro Valley R1-144, we, in behalf of the Arizona District Council of the Assemblies of God, Inc. who holds title to this parcel, respectfully request that a conditional use permit be granted in order for Springboard , a non-profit, shelter care home for abused, adolescent girls, to be built as part of the total developmental plan being set forth by the District Council of the Assemblies of God, Inc., 2009 N. 7th Street, Phoenix, Arizona. Springboard accepts runaways, molested and abused young ladies and ministers to their emotional, spiritual and physical needs until their home-life can be put back together. The average stay by these girls is approximately 90 days. Springboard is not a substance abuse treatment facility and does not accept violent or incarcerated individuals. This ministry has been in existence for over 23 years and is licensed and in good standing by the Arizona Department of Economic Security/Division of Children, Youth and Families, as a Child Welfare Agency. Letters of reference accompany this request and verify the nature of the Springboard program and the positive response it receives from its neighbors. Springboard has outgrown its present facility on 3644 N. Nufer Place and needs to begin construction as soon as possible. There is a waiting list that averages 25 needy young ladies on a daily basis. That is why a 20-bed facility is urgently needed. A significant number of young ladies from Oro Valley and the northwest corridor have benefited from the ministry of Springboard. An enlarged and upgraded facility in a rural setting, in addition to the resources Copper Mountain Assembly of God will be able to provide on site, would greatly enhance the recovery of these deserving, young ladies. Please find attached to this request an initial rendering of a floor plan for the new Springboard shelter care home. It highlights the features the new facility will entail. If a 20-bed facility is granted a conditional use permit,the dimensions of this layout would be increased accordingly to accommodate 4 additional young ladies. Respectfully submitted, William T. Seale, Pastor — S—caL, P.O. Box 65312 Tucson,AZ 85728-5312 Rev.William T.Seale, Pastor 293-9539 Office on behalf of The Arizona District Council (520) of the Assemblies of God. Inc. (520) 850-2202 Mobile 2009 N. 7th Street Phoenix, Arizona 85006 Mayor,Vice Mayor and Council Members Oro Valley 14A.CLA,ck—1) (47 ci ci 11000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley, AZ 85737 ;ED RIhidWCta wawa bywriel Rif: 520-297-2591 . L ETI- Fax 297-0428 oj;tdc\. Dear Mayor and Council Members, We are writing to ask that you deny the Assembly of God's proposal for a Springboard Shelter Care Facility in our neighborhood. Our heart goes out to these girls, but we feel their facility would be better off in an area acceptable to the neighborhood. We have canvassed our neighborhood; there are few homes and a lot of vacant land. It is a rural, gh low-density residential neighborhood that is protected from over development by an Urban Growth Boundary. Due to this boundary line, which is Tangerine Rd., all property north of there is to maintain no more than 30% grading to help maintain the rural character of our neighborhood. The Church & Springboard are requesting to grade 55%, which is a 25% increase. In an 8.82 acre parcel, that is an extra 2 plus acres that will no longer be our beautiful desert. Is it necessary to have a playground and gymnasium as we have these things for our children at the nearby Wilson School? Every single neighbor contacted wanted to sign a petition opposing the additional grading and the shelter care home. Since there are few homes in the neighborhood and some people were not at home, we feel we have collected a large amount of signatures. The petition is attached hereto. David Marsh has informed us that there is no zoning existing in Oro Valley that allows, or addresses a home of this type. Pima County has a category that it fits into, but also requires a conditional use permit and if neighbors in an area of Pima County objected, maybe the shelter care home wouldn't be able to locate there either. It is not that you are taking away any rights they might have had under Pima County, because nothing was automatic there either. Every driveway and parking area is considered in Pima County, as well as Oro Valley, as far as the percent of grading allowed. Just because Oro Valley annexed their property does not mean they should automatically get a zoning, or permit; it just means they can ask for one. They are proposing, based on their drawing submitted to Oro Valley, to place the shelter care facility only 57 (fifty-seven) feet from the Klingler's south boundary line. Moving it closer to Tangerine would not change our feelings and only make it more dangerous and noisy for them that close to the highway. They knew when they purchased the property, or they should have known, that it is not a 10(ten) acreP arcel, but a 8.82 acre parcel. That is due to the setback of Tangerine Rd. and also Como Drive(their East boundary). Most of the neighbors in our area have all given land up to easements and have made our homes fit. In towns there are churches on lots that are smaller than an acre. To say that 8.82 acres is too small for a church and they need to grade the extra 25% is unnecessary, especially if the Springboard Home is not part of the proposed development. In Chapter 6, page 6-1 of OroValley's "Single Family Residential District Regulations," it states, under "Community residences," (b) Such residence contains no more than 6 residents, or 8 residents, including staff." Springboard proposes a 20 bed facility in our rural, low-density, residential neighborhood. Under "Definitions," Sec.2-101, page 2-8, Oro Valley defines a Community Residence: A dwelling unit shared as primary residence by the disabled, or disabled elderly persons, living together as a single housekeeping unit in which staff provides on-site care, training or support for the residents. Such residence or services provided therein shall be licensed by, certified by , approved by, registered with, funded by or through, or under contract with the State of Arizona. Community residence does not include a residence which serves persons as an alternative to incarceration for a criminal offence, or a residence for a criminal offence, or a residence which provides drug and/or alcohol rehabilitation." The Springboard Home is a rehabilitation home. Please do not set a precedent for changing the General Plan or the Urban Growth Boundary. Please listen to the neighbors who will be most affected by the desecration of our desert and an unwanted shelter care facility. You may contact us at the following: Mr. Tim Bennet 12150 N. Camino Del Fiero Oro Valley, AZ 85742 phone: 797-8501 Larry& Claire Klingler 12151 N. Como Drive Oro Valley, AZ 85742 phone: 742-5510 We sincerely thank you for your time and consideration in this important matter. 1 12i2 *5---‘- Tim Bernet date SI /_2.? 7Y))c1/16Zt , • Larry gler date Claire Klingler date PETITION Reference: Case No. OV 8-99-2 (Springboard Facility) We the undersigned residences of Oro Valley and nearby neighbors of the referenced property are NOT in favor of: . changing the allowable grading from 30 percent to 55 percent. 2. the proposed Shelter Care Facility which requires a conditional use permit for the referenced property Allowing the increased grading percentage is a violation of the Urban Growth Boundary, Although we have compassion for the proposed affected residences of the shelter facility we feel this type of"home" should be located on a more appropriate site, not in a rural residential low density neighborhood. No. Print Name Address City/County ZIP Signature Date Pir‘vk 1 i /("pi / ���" ! / � o. ."7:-.273k--- 3 r 47? ! 4 „ 1/)/ Ls-) v)-1 L- 1 .71/4197 3 f ec � /17 , / kt„ -7c 6 1,j() '417(ala s'91 (` 121 1/1A., /6(Zi- ;7c:z-(1?-7:--ic, • 9-• —7 3 I A 14‘65-,72h ..rifIr .7"11111111111V f L (IRMJWL I kc7, 4t , 3 9 Wd&-i., I 4/, - 13 ' Z/z-,-, ://%-? c . 20 1 I f I I PETITION Reference: Case No. OV 8-99-2 (Springboard Facility) We the undersigned residences of Oro Valley and nearby neighbors of the referenced property are NOT in favor of: 1. changing the allowable grading from 30 percent to 55 percent. 2. the proposed Shelter Care Facility which requires a conditional use permit for the referenced property -Allowing the increased grading percentage is a violation of the Urban Growth Boundary, Although we have compassion for the proposed affected residences of the shelter facility we feel this type of"home" should be located on a more appropriate site, not in a rural residential low density neighborhood. No. Print Name Address City/County ZIP Si nature Date 1 ! ' 0 LA. ! (%,w/ I c4 ap.,,a, // 13 ► I I I 14 15 16 1 ! I I I 17 1 I l I 1 18 '9 20 I I I i I Sring 0 , . Y ._ 7_,, ,:„., ,,, . . 1 ., . yipts, ,..-T ,,Z � -.-, - p - r' s 7 Rev. Snow Peawbody ). Executive12 ector _==: ,. '` . 0' , ./ ' March 12, 1999 Mark •r�tc�ne -:, .,Center[Director 44. .- Mr. Tim Bennet {y g` is i-r Larry & Claire Klingler 1y `- 4netStone-� ;°' And Si ners of the Petition g SS 4 Head Counselor To Whom It May Concern: . A We became aware of your opposition to Springboard, having received a l copy of your letter to the Mayor and Town Council of Oro Valley dated '`'` ` March 7, 1999. We regret that you were not aware of the Tuesday, s- _ March 2nd Meeting of the Planningand Zoning Commission at the - ae 4.\_s i= Oro Valley Town Hall• At this meeting, the ministry of Springboard ow £;t 8 `= ,r was presented and received a unanimous approval for our Conditional .�- .r-�- ,� �-��'� Use Permit. :, 4\ _. ��. r ' We want to speak to a fewpoints of concern and hopefully relieve any :rF if'- "-- ,- p p •rri::-.),.•_'.: ,;_ -' ,' ,"\ fears you may have regarding the nature and operation of Springboard: , Q RY �:` Springboard is not"an alternative to incarceration for criminal • ti,8--,-,-1-.:" , ,-Pty L,/ . : offenses" nor"a residence for criminal offenders" or a"residence c whichrovides drug_ and/or alcohol rehabilitation." S ringboard is p p • ,..,. I licensed by the Arizona Department of Economic Security as an : :. / "Emergency Shelter Home. Any youth arrested for criminal offenses cannot be accepted by Springboard but are placed in the Juvenile _e ;_ - , p p rr,M.d, Detention Center or the Center for Juvenile Alternatives. DES further ` -' requires that Springboard not provide shelter to youth who are a danger `, to themselves or others, withdrawingfrom substance abuse, or those ,,:_ ; who are unwilling to sign an agreement to abide by the Shelter's rules. • J 4 For the past 23 years, Springboard has an unblemished record with j- � DES who re-licenses the facility every year as well as coming { ,:„..4.,,,,..- unannounced to inspect any and all activities at the property. Those ! / 4,A , / - youth Springboard does provide shelter care for are those who are `''' being, or have been, physically, emotionally, and/or sexually abused. /' .I`..r W7 Ninety-five percent of the youth coming to Springboard have been .), :_-;:n di � victimized in one or more of these areas. Springboard was created for . ��r and continues to "PREVENT" abuse among at-risk children. '-}-. 4 ' 5966 .'' N.Nufer Place Tucson, Arizona 85 705 Phone:(520)887-8773 Fax (520) 887-8786 Page 2 The attached letter written by Fred and Sylvia Ruelas speaks for the success of Springboard. Their house is 25 feet away from the Springboard Home! They have lived there for 30 years and state that Springboard has been a trouble-free neighbor that keeps the property and the home neat and quiet! Springboard meets the criteria noted under"Definitions", Sec. 2-101, pages 2-8, of Oro Valley's code pertaining to Community Residence: Springboard is a dwelling unit shared by adolescent girls "living together as a single housekeeping unit in which staff provides on-site 24-hour care, training or support for the residents." Springboard is providing a safe, loving environment for adolescent girls who have suffered physical and emotional abuse. We are looking forward to expanding our efforts to care for these children. We would love to meet with you personally to discuss these matters and we would also welcome your making an appointment to visit the present Springboard Shelter Home. Respectfully, Snow Peabody Executive Director SP/aj Enclosure Please note: The Town of Oro Valley has agreed to provide an opportunity for us to meet informally and to further discuss the Springboard Shelter Home. A Neighborhood Meeting is scheduled on Thursday, March 25, 1999, at 7:00 p.m. in the Town Council Chambers. Oro Valley Town Council: I am writing this letter to voice my support for a conditional use permit to allow establishment of the Teen Challenge Spring Board Home at the site of the Copper Mountain Assembly of God here in Oro Valley. I firmly believe this facility and the Teen Challenge program deserve our support based upon their goals and track record. Our town has the potential to provide life-changing support to girls who have been the victims of abuse and domestic violence. There is certainly no better part of the Tucson area to provide a positive,respectful role model to these young citizens in need than our own community. Misinformed individuals have brought opposition to the Home,wrongly thinking"criminals"or other troublemakers will be housed there. Please realize these girls and young women are victims,not criminals,and desperately need our help to keep them from being victims again. If we turn our backs to our community's problems they do not go away,but instead become worse. We only solve our social problems by being proactive and giving support to those in need. These people need and deserve a positive, safe facility within our community. Please allow the Teen Challenge Spring Board Home to provide them a home and a chance. Very Sincerely, ROSE HEPLER 11772 N. Rain Rock Way CJJ/ 47J 1��7 CJ7.J( 1JLCJ :JJl1JOl DHf[171-11t,-1 vfCH1V ► r-+••"- "jv • KRSTRadat TQ MIN kMikeal al Rh magi. ion - 07101 26 March 1999 ({ To: Mayor and Council,Town of Oro Valley ;:. j: y,_ _:r _- Re: OV899-2, Springboard Home We have recently been made aware of the attempt by Springboard Home to gain approval to construct a juvenile borne near La Cholla Blvd. and Tangerine Road. We wish to go on record to be in opposition of this plan, and to urge you,Mayor and Council,to deny this type of development. We are concerned about the safety issues that a center lice Springboard can introduce into a community. We have reviewed a Tucson Police crime report for the first three months of 1999,which involves the current Springboard location. It is quite alarming to see the number of crimes and the severity of them which occurred at that site in such a short period of time. We would hate to see these elements enter into our quiet neighborhood,where it is still safe for our children to go outside and play. Other areas of concern are the increase of traffic problems on Tangerine Road and La Cholla Blvd. Noise and light pollution are other issues which need to be addressed. And also the unnecessary grading away of yet more of the dwindling Sonoran Desert raises concerns throughout the community. Again,we urge a no vote on 0V899-2(Springboard Home). Sincerely, a ~ of, Wallace Craig-) Barbara Crai 2600 W. Limewood Dr. 2600 W.Limewoo Dr. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 9 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: April 7, 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & TOWN COUNCIL FROM: Chuck Sweet, Town Manager SUBJ: Resolution No. (R) 99- 43 SUPPORTING THE PROPOSED INCORPORATION OF THE VILLAGE OF CASAS ADOBES, ARIZONA SUMMARY: As a result of legislation passed by the State Legislature in the Spring of 1997 there has been an ongoing incorporation effort in the Casas Adobes area of unincorporated Pima County. The interested citizens from the Casas Adobes area held an incorporation election in 1997 that was later declared unconstitutional by the state courts, when the 1997 legislation was declared invalid. Since that time the incorporation of Casas Adobes has been in the Arizona and Federal Courts under various appeals. Additionally, new legislation was introduced during the 1998 legislative session and again this year in an attempt to solve the incorporation issues surrounding Casas Adobes. Presently the latest version of the "incorporation bill" is under review by the House Rules Committee with an undetermined outcome at the writing of this communication. Continuing with the spirit of regional cooperation, the attached Resolution would provide support for incorporation for the Village of Casas Adobes, upon the receipt of a written request. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. (R) 99- 43 Supporting the proposed incorporation of the Village of Casas Adobes, Arizona pursuant to Revised Statutes, Section 9-101.01, with Conditions. 2. Mayor Loomis Letter to Ms. MartyCramer, Casas Adobes, Dated March 22nd, y 1999. RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended that the Town Council approve the Resolution No. (R) 99- 43 thereby sending a message to the leadership of the Casas Adobes incorporation effort that the Town of Oro Valley supports their incorporation under the existing state statutes. FISCAL IMPACT: If incorporated Casas Adobes would share in the State Shared Revenue formula and there would be a minor decrease in Oro Valley's share of State Shared Revenue, but Pima County wide there would be significant state shared revenues that presently does not flow to the area due to the large populated area in unincorporated Pima County. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. (R) 99- 43 supporting the incorporation of the Village of Casas Adobes. Town Manage RESOLUTION NO. (R)99- 43 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, SUPPORTING THE PROPOSED INCORPORATION OF "THE VILLAGE OF CASAS ADOBES", ARIZONA, PURSUANT TO ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, SECTION 9-101.01, WITH CONDITIONS WHEREAS, in July of 1997, the proponents of the incorporation of "The Village of Casas Adobes" attempted to incorporate without requesting permission of the surrounding jurisdictions as required by A.R.S. § 9-101.01 (1961 law); and WHEREAS, that attempted incorporation has been declared unconstitutional by the Arizona Court of Appeals and the matter is still in litigation; and WHEREAS, the proposed geographical limits of "The Village of Casas Adobes" are within six miles of the Town of Oro Valley, thus encroaching upon Oro Valley's "urbanized area", requiring the permission of the Town of Oro Valley for incorporation pursuant to A.R.S. § 9-101.01; and WHEREAS, the proponents of the proposed incorporation of "The Village of Casas Adobes" may desire to incorporate "The Village of Casas Adobes" pursuant to A.R.S. § 9- 101.01 (1961 law), and request approval of the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, as required by that statute; and WHEREAS, although the proponents of the incorporation of "The Village of Casas Adobes" have not approached the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley to do so, the Mayor and Council have determined that, in the spirit of regional cooperation, they will support the legal incorporation of"The Village of Casas Adobes" with stated conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA that a second proposed incorporation of "The Village of Casas Adobes" will be supported by the Town of Oro Valley as long as: 1) the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley exist as they are presently constituted, 2) the boundaries of the proposed area of incorporation within "The Village of Casas Adobes" remain as they existed at the time of the initial proposed incorporation in July of 1997, 3) the request is made to the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley in conformance with A.R.S. § 9-101.01 (1961 law) within six months of the adoption of this resolution and 4) thereafter the issue is properly submitted to the voters at an election held pursuant to that section and which is otherwise in conformance with applicable state law. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council on this 7th day of April, 1999. Paul H. Loomis, Mayor 03/31/1999 ATTEST: Kathryn E. Cuvelier, Town Clerk Date APPROVED AS TO FORM: Dan L. Dudley, Town Attorney Date LEY A Q• 0T s y : TOWN OF ORO VALLEY . . , At ,: 11000 N. LA CANADA D RIVE ORO VALLEY ARIZONA 85737 - Administrative Offices(520)297-2591 Fax(520)297-0428 • - www.ci.oro-valley.az.us OUNDED 4' March 22nd, 1999 Ms. Marty Cramer Casas Adobes P. O. Box 36704 Casas Adobes, Arizona 85704 Re: Letter of Encouragement— Incorporation Dear Ms. Cramer: As the Mayor of Oro Valley I would like to express my support for your continuing efforts to incorporate the Casas Adobes area. The Town of Oro Valley understands that the road to a successful incorporation in the State of Arizona is a challenging one that tests everyone's patience and perseverance. It is my position that the Casas Adobes area has all of the basic elements that are necessary to make a new town successful in this metropolitan area. The 60,000 people that would be included in the incorporation of Casas Adobes certainly fits my definition of an urbanized area. As development has occurred in the unincorporated area of NW Pima County over the past several years, the commercial tax base has become a sufficient size to provide a newly incorporated town the funding to provide necessary municipal services to it's residents. I submit this letter to you and the other members of your group to demonstrate my commitment to work hard in the future to assist you with efforts to follow the existing State Statutes involving getting permission from existing cities and towns surrounding Casas Adobes, and encouraging your voters to say YES on the incorporation of Casas Adobes! I truly believe this process would accomplish your ultimate goal sooner than the current approach with new legislation. I can not speak for my fellow Council Members on this subject, but based upon my on-going dialogue with them on this subject during the past several months, it is my belief that the majority of the Oro Valley Town Council would approve the incorporation of Casas Adobes, given the opportunity to respond to a letter of request. Letter to Marty Cramer March 22, 1999 Page 2 If you have any questions or would like to meet to discuss this matter further, please do not hesitate to contact my office @ 297-2591, ext. 108. Sincerely, Paul H. Loomis Mayor C: Oro Valley Town Council Members Steve Huffman, State Representative, District 12 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 10 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: April 7th, 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: David Marsh, Planner I SUBJECT: ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-23 ,OV8-99-1 MIRAGE HOMES REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR SHORT-TERM RENTALS IN THE RANCHO VISTOSO PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT BUILDINGS 1 THRU 8 AND COMMON ELEMENTS OF VISTOSO GOLF CASITAS II, A PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TO BE LOCATED SOUTH OF VISTOSO HIGHLANDS DRIVE,WEST OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD BACKGROUND: Mirage Homes is requesting a conditional use permit for the proposed Vistoso Golf Casitas II to provide for short- term rental of residential units. The casitas will be 8 two-story buildings with four units each, located in Rancho Vistoso High Density Residential, which is analogous to the R-6 Multi-family Residential zone. The preliminary plat has been reviewed and approved by Town Council, and the applicant is requesting the use permit prior to 'onstruction of the buildings. The project is located on the southwestern side of Vistoso Highlands Drive, and will share a private recreation area with a clubhouse and pool located within Vistoso Golf Casitas, a sister project also developed by Mirage Homes and located immediately to the north. Three similar conditional use permit applications from Mirage Homes have been approved by Mayor and Council in the past two years. Short term rental CUPs has been granted for Vistoso Resort Casitas and Vistoso Golf Casitas I, immediately adjacent to the site this application, and a short term rental CUP was also approved for Trendwest, a time share resort located to the south of the site in question. NATURE OF REQUEST: In Chapter 2 of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised, Definitions, sec. 2-101, a short-term rental property is defined as " a building(s) of a residential character other than a hotel or motel compatible with the neighborhood offering temporary lodging for less than one month (30 days). This use shall not create any impact greater than those existing in the residential district. This shall not include any of those properties held by a person who is not deemed to be in the rental business per Section 8 of the Town Code ." Full-time management services will be responsible for the rental opportunities for short-term stay, along with all project operations including landscaping and building maintenance. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 3 SURROUNDING LAND USE: —The subject property is located on the southwest side of Vistoso Highlands Drive,just south of the Vistoso Golf Casitas development. It is bounded on the west and north by a golf course, and on the south by a golf course and the Vistoso Resort Casitas. Vistoso Highlands Drive borders the northeastern property line. COMPLIANCE WITH ARTICLE 3-2 USE PERMITS Use permits may be granted when the determination has been made that the granting of such conditional use permit will not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare. In arriving at this determination, the factors to be considered shall include the following: 1. Damage or nuisance arising from noise, smoke, odor, dust,vibration or illumination; 2. Hazard to persons and property from possible explosion, contamination, fire or flood; 3. Hazard occasioned by unusual volume or character of traffic. In addition, the characteristics of the proposed use must be reasonably compatible with the types of use permitted in the surrounding area. Given the fact that short-term rental properties exist on the adjacent parcels to the northwest and south east, it is the opinion of Staff that the proposed short term rental CUP is compatible. lie first two factors are generally not applicable to this type of residential use. Although it is possible that i ental properties may generate more noise than owner occupied, the size and location of these units will generally preclude families. Occupants of rental properties will most likely be adults who are winter visitors using the nearby golf course, the amenities of the adjacent Vistoso Golf Casitas clubhouse and pool, and other nearby recreational opportunities. Regarding the third factor, traffic volume and character are not expected to change significantly from the current approved use. Traffic circulation and parking have been provided for the number of units to be built. The number of vehicles entering, exiting and parking should be the same for long and short-term renters as for the full-time residents. GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE: The current, adopted General Plan Land Use Map designates this property as medium density residential (2.1 to 5.0 DU/AC), an area where single family detached, townhouse and patio home development is appropriate. The approved high density residential zoning for the Vistoso Golf Casitas II, while not in conformance with the land use designation of the General Plan, was the zoning in place at the time the General Plan was passed. This proposal does address General Plan policy 3.1F, "Maintain and enhance Oro Valley's residential/resort/recreation character." PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENT: Ill property owners within 600 feet of the site were notified of this public hearing. Staff has not received any comments regarding this application; however, Staff has received complaints from residents in the adjacent Vistoso Resort Casitas, also developed by Mirage Homes, that residential units have been rented for a shorter TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 3 of 3 duration than the three day minimum required by their CUP. Staff is currently investigating these complaints, and have added a condition for approval allowing for the revocation of the CUP should repeated violations occur. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ACTION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval(6—0)with conditions. RECOMMENDATION: Staff has reviewed the request for conditional use permit for compliance with Article 3-2, Use Permits, and we recommend approval, subject to those conditions listed in the attached Exhibit A. The conditions of approval listed are identical to those approved by Mayor and Council for the Vistoso Golf Casitas Lodging House CUP, with the addition of possible revocation of the permit for any violation of the conditions. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to approve Ordinance No. (0)99- 23 , OV 8-99-1, Vistoso Golf Casitas II Short-Term Rental Conditional Use Permit with the conditions listed in Exhibit A, attached herewith. OR I move to approve Ordinance No. (0)99- 23 , OV 8-99-1, Vistoso Golf Casitas II Short-Term Rental Conditional Use Permit with the conditions listed in Exhibit A, attached herewith, and the following added conditions: . OR I move to deny Ordinance No. (0)99- 23 , OV8-99-1, Vistoso Golf Casitas II Short-Term Rental Conditional Use Permit, finding that: . ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ordinance No. (0)99- 23 . 2. Exhibit"A" 3. Location Map 4. Concept site plan 5. Applicant's Narrative ../. 41414' ‘N6)8i\,LS1. LuiDt-e-- • ng and Zoning Admini trator 0 i A i / i _ , vikEt li.P dov EA . ;Itivi.r.. ..s.,1 t i ity IT e ••me t Direc nor / /i , / 4 Town Manag-r r:\OV\OVCASES\8-99-1\CUPTC.RPT.doc ORDINANCE NO. (0)99- 23 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, RELATING TO ADOPTION OF A OV8-99-01 MIRAGE HOMES CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR SHORT TERM RENTALS IN THE RANCHO VISTOSO PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND FIXING THE EFFECTIVE DATE THEREOF; PRESERVING RIGHTS AND DUTIES THAT HAVE ALREADY BEEN ASSURED AND PROCEEDINGS THAT HAVE ALREADY BEGUN THEREUNDER. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY: WHEREAS, the Town of Oro Valley adopted a document known as the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised and Section 7-503.B; and WHEREAS, it has become necessary to adopt a Conditional Use Permit to allow for short term rentals; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, having considered said Use Permit; and having held a public hearing on March 2', 1999; and having made its recommendations to the Town Council; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY: SECTION 1. The Council hereby adopts (0)99-23 and conditions of Exhibit A. Three copies of the Conditional Use Permit are on file in the office of the Town Clerk of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona. SECTION 2. The effective date of the Conditional Use Permit shall be thirty days after the adoption of this ordinance by the Town Council. SECTION 3. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of the ordinance or any part of the Conditional Use Permit adopted herein is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. 1 SECTION 4. That all ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be repealed to the extent of such conflict. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this 7th day of April, 1999. Paul H. Loomis, Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Dan Dudley, Town Attorney \\OV PZD\PZ1\OV\OVCASES\8-99-1\CUP.ORD.doc 2 EXHIBIT "A" OV8-99-1 CONDITIONS FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPROVAL SHORT TERM RENTALS VISTOSO GOLF CASITAS II RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 11 PARCEL AJ 1. Complete disclosure of current and future rentals must be released, in writing, to all prospective home buyers. 2. The minimum length of rental time shall be limited to three (3) nights, and overnight rentals shall be prohibited. 3. A complete on-site, full-time management company shall be involved with the rental units, ensuring maintenance, not eliminating the owners' rights to contract elsewhere, if they so desire. 4. Future timeshare of units shall be prohibited. 5. Rental signage will only be allowed on site and must conform to the Oro Valley Sign Code and the Rancho Vistoso PAD. 6. Violation of any of the above conditions may result in a citation, or revocation of the conditional use permit. i • i ui t,,i i t isr . ijs I.i' , ,,, ,„ S 11° Aii 11, w'aItt4 w _,4X'4 ^4'',,,,tid .-",t,,A. ..4,1,: 177��r�.3, -'F+,S z , ? ' .. %t,.�..:,., a...5 :�n::ar�.. .Mt.....w..2..4a-....�8.+.t.�a.cY4u'Y�..u.. .a... ... PROJECT NARRATIVE a t s DATE: January 7, 1999 TO: Town of Oro Valley FROM. Northstar Contractors, Inc./Mir e Homes Gary A. Martinson RE: Vistoso Golf Casitas II/Management Operations 0-° Request for Conditional Use Permit '' - 1f Northstar Contractors, Inc./Mira e Homes is requesting a Conditional Use Permit isg q the opportunity of providingmanagement for both 'v at Vistoso Golf Casitas II to allow pp y g I long term and short term rental of the condominium homes. We are proposing topo ' provide Vistoso Golf Casitas II with the same full time management as currently exists at Vistoso Resort Casitas, adjacent and to the west. A ,t Conditional Use Permit will provide the owners with the management of their tit Q 3 condominium home both while occupied and while they are an absentee owner. lei We are in agreement with placingthe same stipulations on Vistoso Golf Casitas II g as currently exists at Vistoso Resort Casitas as it relates to the minimum length of stay of three days. We continue to feel strongly that professional management enhances the appearance and longterm value of the condominium project and provides the opportunity t. pp for revenue to the Town of Oro Valley through the bed tax assessed against condominiums used for short-term rentals. Q The project does not require any changes to the site plan or buildings to accommodate this request. .1 . C , 1. S I 16927 East Saguaro Boulevard • Fountain Hills, Arizona 85268 Office (602)837-8700 • Fax(602)837-3043 n9 www.miragehomes.com / . .•• ,./ril . 0 ic) i )/ .) ::::: (•,-) • 0 •,' • * '7/ / t<;'�. . . / 'j . f • 1 / i' ,/ ....„ ....-..../ #,,,,,, _�"" �� / / \ / / / ) , //./ •ri...-: A / 1 il r/ 0 1/-1- ., •• 't• / / :•i i i i . 00 f P..±.!: , I d/r/ //://, ai,/ Plilt r. , I i 1 . trti • t.;,. /7 / i•i / ,:•,/ t4 th.) ((iiii\\;••••.".,1/\::',1-::::::''''..' 0 Zi • i4 ,113 ..,14 • i/ / / /.? f jr_O/ AA _nig el, IA.. . i . , ...... 4. Ni.' , Itiii,-.71"\• . 1?;.. . 1 • / :•:::, / $0/ , .--fi • . olik N ... . / . \-‘,../ I._ / . : li • Aiwp,.., : . ... ..." ,/ 0 ...... //tb,./ . .. . 4,,* v,tv . ...... .,...\ .- . sr-itt, - V.:.' , . ,-// ,, ....•.. ' •-•. /:-/. ' /7 ./''', e . :..4..t. ,,,g4-,,,, ,6 4,\---41, .... i.4.0.....44.,, I:, .. ..\\(\\ '''' Veltib ' ..... -. ,; I .,5 -.,p,' . -i / .-i-: / . i:: ,- , - iTi . 41111‘rislik,. ,----..," 1.-4 slip,•. . . , i *. 3' Ati,AY 'Al 1 r V\ '. , ‘ , ,. I 11, - rN (e.,40- . *7.40?`' ' ',whir..., .__0 \\:\ ‘,, iNpAs ., ., .,..., t fr-ii..1 .,* • . i .4.\_ ;II : 1 H ,. t.--____,_ .....•. ...... ..........._•_•...„ !, *AI -, . --v. :.:,A:... ,-•„\--_....:-,-;-______-- ,,.....--- ,,,,. 4 4011F:14.. W Oilipp flN• //•�►•� / i 1, 'j i= ..• . yam.•,";61ij*....,-,r /��� rri Z - 1 ��$‘ . %. - /,y . .. -, ' / y_J. i \,, i'.1. . *IV: A# .. :41!• . D D to i \ .f...:1..14:41.. �,/ ��' r.'•; 'l': 0 „--0 :, i m 1/4,-, .....4 C/). i \ ,- --, --a ___I CD l'inli aj ........, .. . ........ t.,- ? ,, / 4 /1.,4, • .--________T......,:. � f� 'f•�� ti ice' � / I // i rn 0,,z ......e. 0 711 :::,...:‘,,, i. > ...ii) '..."-'' t• .,, •-- ,' - .‹ . 2 4,f //, . . '›. .."/ . O ."� i 1 -� � �, (i) Z _._ • / / 8 ; > 0 gi 70 0 C7 / ►1 ' 'RI'`2' c C) 0 I ...P-�' o (i)- . . c *x c).7p 0 0 0---- z . _ ....16 . ...,,, ' I ---42./141,_._41/7 P' // i i \I:- N ...h. r- „ ,r___ / ,, , [ [ /ll/ , i -<.:.. C /. -,-..._ :: ... Oeu. ; / iN di 11 1 ..„A ,, NZN0 I / , O . Xi' ....4 �i t � , Y DOS 0 1b�, i !t 0 0 3 0 — > (in .:::. 149)4t44 I ir ( 33 ..... ...iz ,,„,„ %.,,, (...-. u..,..... ...,::......: / „ - ,, r \ °v.) ' ' >6 . <1 ...4 ., „,.. ' • ,....,.., ,..... ill/ , ., ....,, > '. x -v"rn Ili! • --.. i 1: ' ' "..,., , lc;_, , r. :...,,:... •,•;.•,•, i ,\. :<. c ts) ...,:..,..„ ,,, ,. , ,..,, ................._...._ 0 r.v 11:1 \- c _ _ - _ _ _ - ,�______ _ _ - - TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: April 7th, 1999 £0: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: David Marsh, Planner I SUBJECT: OV12-98-21 VISTOSO GOLF CASITAS II FINAL PLAT, RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 11, PARCEL AJ, LOCATED SOUTH OF VISTOSO HIGHLANDS DRIVE,AND WEST OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD BACKGROUND: On February 3rd, 1999, Town Council approved a preliminary plat for Neighborhood 11, Parcel AJ for development by Mirage Homes. The applicant, represented by the WLB Group, requests Town Council approval of a final plat for this project. The project site, some 3.3 acres in size, is located west of Vistoso Highlands Drive, and is surrounded on the north, west, and south sides by the Golf Club at Vistoso. The existing condition of the site is mostly undisturbed desert. SUMMARY: The proposed Final Plat presented by the applicant calls for 32 condominium units to be constructed in 8 buildings on 3.3 acres, for a density of 9.7 DUA, which is within the 10 DUA permitted for this site in the Rancho Vistoso PAD. The project will be similar to the Vistoso Resort Casitas to east, and the Vistoso Golf Casitas to the northwest, also developed by Mirage Homes. The various planning aspects of this project are described below. Golf Course Overlay District The layout proposed by the applicant is substantially similar to the layout of the previously approved plat, and the proposed structures and property lines will be no closer to the golf course; thus Staff has no objections to the applicant's proposal in terms of the Golf Course Overlay District. Recreation Area Requirements The proposed Final Plat is in conformance with the recreational requirements of the OVZCR. The passive recreational requirements will be met through the provision of a passive recreation area in the northwest corner of the development, and the active recreational requirements will be satisfied through the `shared use' of the active recreation facilities in the Vistoso Golf Casitas I development, located immediately to the north of the project (see General Note # 34 on the attached plat). These facilities, which include a pool, picnic area, and play area, are also owned by Mirage Homes, and are of a sufficient size and character to serve both developments. While this arrangement is unusual, it is permitted under the OVZCR. • Rancho Vistoso PAD Requirements All requirements of the Rancho Vistoso PAD are met by the proposed Final Plat. The 9.7 DUA density proposed by this development is in compliance with the High Density Residential designation for the site, which permits a maximum DUA of 10. A 10' Buffer Yard A is proposed along Vistoso Highlands Drive, and 1.82 acres, or 55%of the site is provided as open space,more than satisfying the 10%open space requirement of the PAD. Traffic& Streets :he private entry street consists of two 14' travel lanes with extruded curb and curbed islands located to allow for free flow of traffic to the units on either side. Meandering sidewalks are designed on both,sides of the street to provide access to the parking areas and the units. The street serving Units 3 through 6 consists of two 12' travel TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 3 lanes with extruded curb and meandering sidewalks. The street sections do not meet the Rancho Vistoso PAD design guidelines. However, the proposed design is consistent with the design approved for other Golf Casita sites -'within Rancho Vistoso and is acceptable to staff for the development of this site. Although the community consists of private streets, it will not be gated. A turnaround will not be required at the entrance to the site. This project and its 247 trips per day will comprise a minimal amount of the ultimate traffic on Rancho Vistoso Boulevard. The estimated build out traffic volume on Vistoso Highlands Drive adjacent to the site is 5,400 vehicles per day. Therefore,this project comprises approximately 4.57% of the overall traffic on Rancho Vistoso Boulevard at this location at build out. This should not be problematic as the roadway has a capacity of at least 13,700 vehicles per day. The traffic volume does not warrant installation of a left turn bay on Vistoso Highlands Drive. Drainage The site is located within the Highlands Wash Drainage Basin. The Pima County Flood Control District has designated this basin a critical basin. Drainage detention is required for this project. A regional detention pond at Moore Road in the vicinity of Neighborhood 10, Parcel M will satisfy the detention requirement. Drainage retention is also required. Partial retention will be provided in a basin within the golf course property and the southerly corner of the parcel and the balance provided through utilization of retention credits available from other existing basins within Neighborhoods 10 and 11. Grading The proposed finished grading is consistent with the Rancho Vistoso PAD grading standards. Cuts of up to 5' will occur along the northern boundary. Final drainage design in this area will dictate the actual depth of the cuts. Fills of 4' to 9' will occur at the rear of Units 7 and 8. The balance of the site has cuts and fills in the range of 2' to 4'. Cut or fill slopes of 10' or more, if they should occur, will require benching per the Rancho Vistoso PAD grading standards. GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE: Staff finds that the Vistoso Golf Casitas II final plat is in not conformance with the medium-density residential land use density designation of 2.1 — 5.0 dwelling units per acre; however, the proposed development is permitted by the existing zoning. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval, subject to those conditions listed in Exhibit A, attached herewith. SUGGESTED MOTION: The Council may wish to consider one of the following motions: I move to approve OV 12-98-21, Vistoso Golf Casitas II, Final Plat, Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 11, Parcel AJ, effective on the date of satisfaction of attached conditions in Exhibit A. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 3 of 3 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Exhibid"A"—Conditions for Approval —2. Reduced Copy of Final Plat , Oxi:....... I. P 110 ng 71 Zoning Administrator A i j lb , i a g•1 1 iiAl4.1# s• Community Devel RI ent Dir;ctor I 4.1. di i 1 //�1 ... .4 Town Manag'r F:\ov\ov12\1998\12-98-21\FPTC.rpt.doc EXHIBIT "A" CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OV12-98-21 VISTOSO GOLF CASITAS II FINAL PLAT RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 11,PARCEL AJ 1. Vistoso Highlands Drive shall be labeled as a Public Street. —2. The final drainage report shall be submitted which shall address the final design of the street section C-C and drainage channel section B-B. The report shall include a detailed section through the sediment basin. The Table of 100-Year Post-Development Peak Discharges shall be revised to include Concentration Point 5. The report shall also address the erosive nature of the earthen channel carrying flows to the retention basin. The report shall include the updated Summary of Retention Credits available within Neighborhoods 10 and 11. 3. A recorded agreement between the owners of the golf course and the owner of this site with regard to construction and maintenance of the drainage basin, drain pipes, drainage channels, other drainage structures and cut/fill slopes that occur on golf course property shall be provided prior to the recordation of the final plat. f fNV N N �NV N N N N N N ° 0 J Ol U ♦ N r0 0 J P U t u N O !� O J 0 Ti; # U F°. O Q7 8m >_''� $p h ���$88'^;���_ '� 3i 5�g$ � �'> > ZZ���z} �m v� o z 26.1§,.>1 2 > I/>�' C,c I > ;loci >...4 r� y WA Ov givi myi.N ! n Nu_0 yn�>�>>1 ,c ZA , G;2 = iu�80 -,zZy25 2Z S� m ''y Fc Fi � X�... > 4111' y 6^ ^ j�f I�f'C/^"v� Z A m > A ` !Ing m, C'••' > cm S_rN m y Z A \ p` 5i > >6Ing pR R0 82 AG g ,��pp, s�>�> J53 og �N'ZE� �p�� yp �Z Z4 A �y"���.. �� � �Z�{�� A.� � Z>'.� N U�,��V1 � �c� f ,c �� A� 8-•og 2 P.?<4 ;Y pm R1 , ..6$mgm q > p4,e_o� N g 124 Ap �p :cPI >g ,1g�?L<F �5QQt' 6' u 1 �wNz f)�, ?.4 'E umzi= +z_-> 6 > W2 A ��� ��pA� ��PUNA>2�y ��CZ}�mO��� O 1~�OX^� 'A-' �,��- ' Z N 201 O y_11, 1 Z S• OS 11 1.. G -,oap 'occ--ff /1 ,8 <�N''C 2f 7 A > ng ci1 2 5 �rA��2 F y2 y�V >_+>6Ay ppA X��. QFC T��.p1y ;1< p �p�2� Fm ��< Zm �� >,�+'' _ �[�_ppmyy1 {rpf0� aC•�i rQi��� 1r'2� � mO � mmr''';'oO�zOA (O�><yO Zyf•1 i�� ��m��ZJ f~Z� Sf•1 {��...� f•1�4A��4 ����� mm 2frA1�A I.1�2 J� c�n/'1 = 6� .�1�1 1 � Nmp1.1 2 nZO Ar7• ZY .tA t o › :ApVO 1 0mylii m�� ;� >�o_'r�`e�� l� � m��'mo���� � li �o�s�� z � g�--4 _cN,,i zA -� , (>� 'z �-���u 5> ZZ � �j> �O�S > =�4�1NFmZp�=O � >� m 6t��fL1 �� {�V 1:.,griA � >�1 �<��'�I'=7rZ A$ M AOvb>N�N.y.,1 v '0r,aj .ijp -�i,g, r0-g ,1; t,83� Zxjp 2`i C>f0� p{ yy � N27,3:-:!: x,> p`� f 2 _ i�fp2OAU m mmm088Ar � ActZ'$qao ioo�r>; � �,m ii "� c' o `�� '�r�i r�"' �2;o�go cn �$ �tcn,B OG�o jqZ S �_IM 1 n $E O �°pi=2 �m'1z y<�p C� > Pre:' 1 { m z �1 ''1 f rvi !rp Xm�p� g r.:8 u '�S ji 'f'� I Z�O m�AM�N�C. �C--1�1// Amro �I�� �! �_ yF' � �p�N� � � mmA�� �my -i , 1 N � ,ZN u 'AM! 'n , p O n C `Uf O ppA 4 p > (((///���Z +�N >y■Q^..� {� ,^ ^, �� A y0�.i��_ [r��f�y��Oy Z.•'O � Z�;r.� O Z� �m� J<�' ����°� �� � ������L7 �;p {O� . bill O� 2 AO� A �5°a nnn !OpAp �� >r>���ZZ po .•p�p �� _ y $ c',,19,7, 1 i r�r1 _ rn cmc : �r•��l ; r•1 �S q'3b g b m O E,;6gm�R"Vr1 r•1 2c .>y02 S p dO Z Z ;cip>g p 9yN t. mci...xm O Z> % iIm/8;•z , ':.'N1 A e�•i A d E ==ig> gArAZy, _ > S30-1Z' g y,pg{ �,q,r�'AZ N x m0tfi.° �c� hi �S�>rpn�Ly� �SoF � �^���R4�O, �iQ>�,�� � ; 229 ��� �m �Q� z � ; N� •,s'c• 9 DA �°. t� `2,4; ��Zz��F ;fmn '< �Pi > Z ;.� <�m >O� .y-. A SNA ;� yT• (1.1 c m y� O~ 0 , ;Art t/1 m , O ,,i -.;,10, m 10, !S�,I A> r•1 �• y Z D Z�m R 1 �� .. lel m I O V U z o 8 z2 r00,,q 1s 4g� p19 ogg 1 2 ��+ z < _ � Az D " g'.$ F z> .. 1"' 5 i r)2 ' A i'3•p2>ais��"yczi rPn,� 2 2 / 2 I9 y0� .2si 'm8o9�'mr�2g '§-.2.r�.@" ,oA n,' oy v9 2 A 2 >2 1$m�+'c A '>4d 3 `Vy�J�( E!', 22 2c4 -</{/>y 2, ry fA�.1A_ o2 c'm;�� G p5! m x m �" sl §79 A SpA D Ay�O A'� O ..P,-T,' n ^' C> SS Am {�>A� S 2 p1m�•> � Q�O � � o+ uu m '1 pC O A 0,21 ,yZ., rPp�p 5 > E{ y>m XI�0 g2.;A .1r Z t�j>� 3Z{ 2 JUNN , r'j pi* �� j ip ZN m0 h r,.=j2>A O o c�.,0 t,)6rl AS� ig -49 S m ='� m ' ➢ Z y 2Z 4 y Z> A » O O A> / I my I m °.E g'o +5.g 0 o 5 ?'m, r A r u N - x D IO Z3 t =�3 0 »_ r*1 y a 3 o o +°r�t o i° ni S Q r�i1 c',t�1� 8 _c\oQ / I r�rg P � m '- �Z °°� u�'SZ h T� � Z 'Z L #.l A /g � f� i� uf� 3� r / �� �ih � � � ~� N N 3a i up0 ° u Z o D ., m � P9 2uN emo3z ye J z u m �� O� p wUu �° T� o S �S1 � o N cn u� � vL,' f*1 Zrilt. N�m� �� ;i9i, �8�=� s w8 S 99 N$ ae us S g� �I : AZ G� S 1 3N1 QQ c}Q��_ o s. 8. ° S4 's g °S° NiO m o ail ii El ,♦-• , L�v.; ys ;ev �i� � { R u as °� o$a R' + �� y� I �• ...,�, o8 o~ §Eira5 ZyFil m N + N �� °e �g °oe �o umi N o° ill �� �♦►� , /�yr Aorta' �vi,COi r4i o S' ^'g a 0i 0 �8 �Z S S Z° 4J1 Z 3 r :•�� li//� • �-A-4 zo o A 2;Aet C ° uo e� a n 3 u §-2 o. ° ,�, y �� SI ♦ �,, �� \4:ii•SP ` rmrnPg % in!OaoQ fib{W R 2 ' s W a J 2 c,3. a o fQ $ ���_ ��\� I1� / ,�� m o � ,z~r1M ��o� m i �� S= c g fig$ U11:p o �"" ,-.1.- ± O .,� •,�/ � 1♦t'�\ ��t►�t� �- � ����N ��>mm �,�;o� o s uo g`�° Jo : o ITl liP � �il- Z, Q,;d m..F,,,!> Z -h 7° ♦� n 7.° y � z »� � ``�i"�, w \ � / �A � Z A~ i/1 Q m u I 3 o u 2 a zv n: I N I ♦� or m� �L2� n �� 77 T3 NO O�O �� C S � �� (A ♦', � 7 l� y m >� zrz ' DP z yo z� �� oil °> >w ' '',,,,. 1:•f,, ' Xoy. IA oo^ . §mR m aongg. N ue a ° -.e o I 4 j �Z, Z 2�' o° o i °eo °a g zz AI ') / / .C.ol um,z IrAA '„I c>' ^o c 8a °,c o Qy ," / / rr+1Z� 29 raiz tmif c� > rs' O O• a / >� ZPR o. o° c o 2y° g r- ,,,, v 1 i m$ > Sic � 4� g° �� $ o29 3u m �� ;g2 I; zr�1 2Op>? 9-,. , °° I O•° yp l X o n 7,1' e a u ;-(2 Ip;2 DAC53 y> a c� uo ° �. ,° N- ,s- I O A . m .y- S>� g Wiz =m • > 'may § m ,m �m .j m .m �� o' ~ oo >� , $i^ D mom_ 13 - 22m -. _ z ,� o Tii D F i o n , N 22 >> m 8� 0 - ro/� N A;,. 4�z � M O ip c„, fT1 m cMrz� 4Q cryrzf� VI't fgi C , 2sp2 T1 1 1�n{1 < f. Dpp2A m Tg'i '4� >2 T M> 2 1• N N I, N 1, . Nl' 2AZy2 ; cif OO� � A � O �K �- r� zt5 iii v o 6 ,.z-, > FD =, :.! z = `�r�i2`z Z 2 A< o 2 5,2 rii x. DD;D : ^ 2 N 1�, ;� m Z ,,, -51P p 1 A O 0: E a .Z ZOt� e-2-1 Z > ;�� ,- j m C A O ZO ' • L yi; v, Z D j m ,:2, ;mS • A = D 0A D •J A p • F,' Fy O { Qy m ' ;m!1 'A ;1yZ 0 A A4 l ;- ,N0mO >0o'> n m;4 i ;I 4, 7:1 r4.1Pi 1 li . ' ,01 '..-'-0 Ilea qq; 1 q-,�A15 n i .---ik. i : <1 w N ,AZ , !hY mFr : Vp » � mloy mmQ p ,,T, O` `mv� o : m iRrn- -,1-' rmOO• 1m Zpm yDC Auli Am1Z3f gNr1 Io .25 74 O �/!�. M I!1-Z11,11r.����� aOg.�����-)._y���a���O�"-'a•c,O��ma�yy {VVl I ZOO Fp $�IJ1OCZ� \\o�2 �A, rC� ��G•Z�ZCz�r�m.;>..�Ao2�p Z�ZO�m: :: m�Z>�9lC�'�11-OS ZS�CA��r$'o21Qnr�.lC Z2C� ; =:� �_,c�I//1'1 1 GOppC2� I :01 2 lnA _ f. ° Ii I rn O_ N �VzZo �G m� o „- y2 Qv 9 ♦ I I u 9D� N myil.A, �A OAFO Zyr Zr ,1:m _' O I I • N ' Rn J NN < I o u u (1,---AP, 4 �pt0~O 7pym1pM� 2 _ D m I Q 02 N,N o._ O � { E iO gy, iyC ,53C; y0 z� O _> bZ� p0ybym ''''2 m a ,,, � j Ci Anij8= ;AW,.diyO -di 8E -.1 ",r nm ' D. ' � pz- A A n^. % ' SLI 0, � � ft O7 I , °_,>O . V .-,. "%4[C''' � % F1-142 i = v , AArzrO9Z 2 Ao �- i~, mm> `^ Z ?J-4 N. GAo Ori; i , a m r-2m A A iy 7 t a-C 'T7ZG,~�"� mA^"� D z rmV >�-; �g�mp m :�, g zZA ?O .9 'mil z u - :�id00 Q gnSmn�Zpvsy^V m ; 2 Z m m A 01 i , 1 11. to 0§ '-iOV , �,' ,AR0NZ7ym2_r �Z> g0Z i i 'At9 =p °>ym qo+z>lv 2o . v ' N!, °"Iiii 4T/� < i: a is, 'ai 0to Oy -+Q \ 1 m ' o " o p- - o1IVU5çjj 7 \'c 'o ' o �>rr _� mAy >p 0aini ,--,.'-'',2c.;2�� .7. A nim ,2A > �mm � 1 y WN `+. VApTr.'A4^. ry> ,,.%•,., , ,,,, 11of3 " mQO > A<> 0 m1�Om 1117.-8''',7, ,>O I1y � - eIyPt �OO '��. myO=m rnmrn^;m PmmA 0 22* ,< z•1 { OO' Z � :..i'2;Z O O p A �' 25' ,2; t-,G�77 Zmm O� NJD >9 o 4 -q-- p� pmm> mOQmNj Q � 141 ,Vp0 AA ;uDmr` RA �, c;,--0 yA^0 A O. Cll> �r ''o ;1 f-,13 ;A r> ' A - . 1 9 4�Ae3� �" �., Z (i.,-g — ZyH0j o tynn ,m0o`pC alit pv d� myi 2T,%oNN I ^ _ 9 sCDOocAmvi{ NinCy.vmg ,AAoi' Ip ' , Li,' r`1,1 1y \ > m4•eOw Oc• G A Om� OOV � C 'pi = O;mOSZ AApA>Z1 m -p! ry oAy ^i o N1+ i5 a�S. --..•� '7 m{N0 1;0.7,0 y ^ AA �rnA p ,Poi p1 OD Oi?Z Z� ZZmOL O 2 uYs m 13 % 42,1 tiG7 ,:,2 Q -te7 c(L)278g Nr<i.ftC ,53q0g!, NZOZ .yOmlz dq ',rymmA - 67 X n0 0 A Z Q",?, o 2.4 Q > 4 §5 ° mOi yo0z160§A C2Oo4 1 >Zv ,« a n � rnn m Om <MAb .bOCom O.u= ,,=_:,- _ N:\1%031\PARCELAJ\PLAT\AJY-1.DNC 03/22/99 BEZ Inammunimr 0 -I 6 i 8 8 •• n iii X8,A 9p T6 � gi rr�T{�'Irn-rn a - w U • u N - �i-- mu,.uN-.oGSivGG�GGG � QCS, > ?)r--- - coo UUZNVI.UV122Z2CA VI VIN I~ gg gg tg gg ' 4 Pi2- rr 4 •VI P r� Ny N i0 G v 01 y v♦N 2 Z 2 2 j 44,1 OO Z�� N�>Ci �dcdt.S14�,:nSw♦ MMiti ii izi i4 >9 .sm !,18'i g2 .p N-.U!W VUN OI O j m G) G] n OZ 'J__ ___p_ s" Q-��:. t�..t ettg.g..1A Ei E2 E2 '9 411 > `�" �. q , ain ru 2Ei o$iCig§§- r c+ Zoq CZ m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m i_ > > > q uZZ� UPNONdI000ICOO�Or'1�1 O> i •W 0/ _ _ NI-• CC CC m O og N O~ Z !IA !A po++ 11pp NN pqI > Z-a Z Z 1 N �f (� � ��-IP ii �4� !V � ill -- �m �rzi cii d� �� d9 >r '�pG>..g > umi �vmi •< • Zt • < •<< ¢� ;;�?i �g9 fi r" r�i 'b' i q tr�� C o m X3'9��9.9'S Ue RR SR 99 zoi �_» ? Z > p p p p pp / p p p (5: CTS ll 01U;:r.,1,'O$$9 8$J.0 Ns W mR,� ; ; ; 2 M Ng > 1::trpr> kg i OQ m O 3 4,a°r, D O r7 oa' ;�,ao> / eQ e5 ti4 i,' lii 7 \ - Ci: c°''''; ti I � m N Il / / ,,, -i 0 m� CL mmG ■ WI ,2 4, / „ CrCj ,o.„,„..., � -,>.›?) ( )ii./ ,,, 1-11 �ic > �Kp 14, 6/ $ ' og i o'foo r� , ,r 0 * 8�.n 6` >N ,r '* / �\\\� \ NZN I �pt� •wy QQ”) ,\., il , 7\-0 r-p ,-, NN-N,-./ I ., ,„, ,, , „ (7,,,,,,,,-, ,, ., , tiftl'o. N .4..8`..j. / ,„. ,..-- ' —I \\ ii t.' "f" ***v \ ' tOri,, z•) `1`.,, ,L g. �Q / r @ y"; ' i , ,,,„ , . . . , ,v ,,Q, 2 / , .,A. 0.5 ;40 -,i'et, 04,t @ S ' '..- :.• ti \ '. -4---r--- @ kik:rev . V . • Ilk --i - v. ..- .. . c. -N 4. u sa � A. 14674) —1,—, ''' `'-',,.-4 - � n � .,-- , ,/ Q..,.. AvInvw- 0\ 07-0410$ ,------ , -„/ ,>, / <cu! <Cm. c , i� \ \ "'' ' d'i 121C: i\ Z / SAA A^" OWN /t T. )4 cf. .,--<,s(n- Jaz .. mA r�G � �l + ► ::::1—:"\lo.:111-%''9' og1_ U) mei (;) mi �z81 ,®t� ��/ �. c= zzo '-{ Zo 'Ii " t 1 A , (� �r. // \\ ) / m �� -i cmy jjj I y �f\ Q •/'/ 1 ;, =Z� \\ /'' 0 I ; mZ / 4M� -1(..� , ) \''.2,9 '',371/// \ \\):60, / � � rip r___ H-, C. \ 9 / .\\,0.,,,y, 0 0 \ ass / S N P Ic9\ -<R4 N N N (;) NI \ . / ! / /4'0, vI C=IA5 I ii - \ �� a P.n I;iu 4 �l la'• o r- S T u 74-mss(.) I y wl ;D�ZOr o-� I 1 �8 /� /�NOZA O .• I C C 0 0 0 >T�C) mSD�NZCo q 0 G� 0 �p $ o d V ;b i,, O , ya Co0''.3 ,(;) N I b a - I m •.. -„, C� A2 O G7" .te ,, �+ D TI8 I 33 26 �t- a. ( ln; F2' v.' ��ya (_) N N vog3cnrnm I It.11 i t.g", k-- a'O u) N N I V« ate" 9NN c�� N:v9.31\PARCELAAKA,A.,-2.0.03/22/99 Ki J A , + G N X r el iM1 A.. G") —I i IlE aul a.uN-c10 1p�a�il ar.l-....rim 2 L !_ ! 3. n .� m8>> 1 O m J a a r u N >_ � � b � b y �r� ig, � �a c Ma) �o N.Z In N N to to 2 Z Z Z.N N Uf �� �� >p��p>� Sym p8> WW aJOp pppp V V pp�1 07o 1b ll = .Z.. .Z. ._.. PI 2��1•CN> o �ppN �O.r CUV r 01 4yy�yyySS�O�111�(��tUj21QQ�f Z7L = � �� � �>ZJ�1 ,{ N..� NZ �N�UO�i.�U �ipObN WfTlAC .A C� C'1 jr. �Ap UZ-� =-1 p 11 i olt17?..,V.I'l1V01V1J.{AN mmmrlmr•lmmmmmmmmmmQG An 8 4 ,� c� N o �e fM gi --i{ u li {� p1 V N1 ..'•'� [� f�Ps�j OV1� � O .Zi m N v P♦ '.'$m IJ O OI N OI O C Z Z �p J ^' -� Zj O)N 07 pN�NCCC Npp�++Id J�01pp1 O � 2. ^�12. i. 01 {� f�1 t�b J 0110/0 O1t+N 10 b 01 ONI k t� �f•1 -/�• 1f•1 -i l•1 ��m =IA�� 8� � mfr.. �]ri m>m>m>m>"a'a>m>it Al fl- A.4.) r g g x- AA Cp it Ag >l MI C>]gQS1f11C>Ny SANZr< { Ij7 � f� f•Zl i� � � f1.1 �1�1 '20 Ag 8 il CfAp n ~A �Q �Q �QO }( i�N 2 NI� Sp > lig 01N♦G N�O SigJ OIN r7----] / \J'. DOA 2 IA 5m 1 O c�o�Om v,Ir-^ °n un� n�Z 'iA`OR' D z E. ;4:-Ii o O no 1. / rn�n'n .o (;) lejg' (,) f oaf e ix N•2 7 \ C; ) V/ mM R1 r- >RA R1 / OI �, >� � �ZA I N / C 1!,/Y :Ili •P // b. _73 _-. O0 m v g 0 o-'m 00 4 s 114% Z $/ . -8mn, >N, a •,,44 aft O '\' >g 6t• �,,# a �14 ti 7 0 ,, .4ylie r.XI r> it, II II II \ � • � / x+ n ip O / ' 7 � % .. i . , tiV � s \ . I ct, .0940# \ i . N,\,,,, ._, ., r- 2 ,Y t 53 / — ,,,,, 0, 4,/ ...•— /-,‘4,, v(;* N C ///// /' �Oti I / /• 440 ;\446\4. 4I tis > 4—., ,-,.:174 cn ,/ s23b. •1 -- - '-. rkg .01*, 0,14* @ 1 , cn ',, ///\ °oo 4,- , ---__ ',„ i --- i---7'--, '1 r z cli 4.% v ,45,,,, ,.- - -s-s NI Z . . . '''''" acv , qc?). . / _ y o >. ....* A il . . , ,, - ..._„\, ..,,,, . Ai,-2- .7-,,g, -'"2"; y 9Zrvf�1 rIl �:1 "› 1 -4 m • t&N‘s4 `,J Z.y G7 N R1 D, 'A -i 1 @ tri* lr /" 1 / z (;) Zo ,'y \\\, tis • ��/' \\ ,. C7c / cn zZc -� > r'�D 1 > ,,i Q .m-1 �= ??� oo� \s\''1. w //' C `t m z / a44M Z. cc �l C 8 66 / / cnw .., C J n \''' '''S 0 :r'i;/,i t O 1,/a°D u �_ !f *• Ns.cn (I) WI Vin \ / �� -is s .,I=i l [. R IP V� Ivy ' _ ' �� /T� �"01 2 vlo �. ` y / C a•;1/4i 8 `A3 / '.7 6 / 4 ,- I I:j ri7 C tilifig ,li � C_ a y� rAJ� I ti �DCc ��lt"-7'-..cm (:) ' // I ZN�p �'O (:) ia00 -� •'/ 00 ,i 1 1 '-''''''''CO co -(�ul(n w> � ac'zV'� 0 co0 0 ZV , P?ri� I b I I A >a Only :j(A N 0, 5I.i `;'`Qc7a - C) rcw 114 00�.--.1 :i-Ivy 2 Or �'1a � (nog6Ao lA �ZO f it('), N N Dgmmaew-i _ 11 ', vO�Nof•• i:'1 is 0 - - - _ .. 1. p ..r (;) N N I 0 0 !^ b � UI -F. I m m A « te. 9NN P wiLl t, q11) uN .c....„... N:\1%031\PMCELAAPLA,A.fP-3.D.03/22/99 KZ _J P tcp ❑ ❑ C P I IE..Ej�AENT TI�A�Ililll ���1 � LI wtI TE --� ��r�wll. <o�,�% 5.72' ?� 11.836.3;10/4'1' to �" `,28 m o 9.67' 0 6.31' 13.81' ` >O S>Q U � (1OU� O 41 V -1m 2.33' n' ,A"i2.0? r^1 rn 8. 11.: ��5q`� ( o� 24.50' I-< ^ � 21.50' '• - >�> I - Qi +. o JC aj � Z . ' ._�•u > rnN rn3.50' afTlgB • ^� 3.67 v _.� uU S 10 25.1r 1._- m27.17' I! Li I I lg. i Ii �L_ � o cn I D J 0.33' Q c3-�m 'I I I,;u u N ii l wc - 'I zzm J I z, - _ _ p N-• ! 27.17' l C) 27.17 S _ -- I� I o � 7 m o o;� lI l 25.67 C p a 1,-,:, �> r„O Ag , z P.. I N I 25.67' ii ^a I� 11d w I 27.17' II 2 c iI _� I rn -1--- u 25.17' -A _I - C rn 3.67 li 4E' Z Z L ef N L r i A li I 3.50' _ CU d a, II d N rpt u u II� Q 1^ D u 21.50' T 0.50' (A 2.00' II I E _, r z 1 24.50' • M rn M nmc�C 2.33' a Omz Cd u o O a, o q u o ,' o u u 13.00' _y 10.17' � 6.64' 13.14' C f MI'��Cp,p ITIT1�I 1 I c2m \J• 5.72• GY Imo+ 1 zcFn•; / ----'-------F---, EEd:�STS 1111-Lo ❑ ❑ --1 D fA " o, U + u N +8 y + LL �pye,0 m 0 m f- # 8 mord, AF mi:i �(,,(°?' ~m �p $ 3 A -s8 32 8 �1Q y 2 r Dl�>�0 > mm nr"� Dry tm/) T 1 =N <-i 2 yC P X;;*'. 40 ;2 g I-'?„ -,p, '' o ig Co- , ?= a IOo' ,p, u y o. � _^�� vo om N�>J Um i u :: ! g 2m : 'IXA - I U r > m q g ,,.._•______„,....-. ---� - I� �I o i �4 5.72' ?\ vzc�=� mmm A gN ti v e I z o �o Z29 m = �A z ' L� 23.81' 13.81' IQ yAfff...��� o r� >m �m ,,, ' o 0 i( >2 °';', .r. S� O u 11 mP i2m N cNn N > m O Iil �u �1 4.00• v oL _ 0.33' �I �r Z 9.00' -__k.49 :(•, ..ig;',0,, . "\ ---'I -.< u r'1 A.1 - m = I 1.00' a.00• 1 m -. J I 0.33' o u N g II I I Z. .12 pr 16.33' 1 S 25.67' I O g CNI zbzs.00'n '° Vk4.- --I 8 --,,,,,--5,,--,,,,,--5,,z); O 1 V2 A g a'000 I ..;.....1 +.. i moEr; z1° on O �' D',v;� I ILg 5.00' Z"0' Q' T �oa _ 03 O 8►N o',, ,-, z O 7C ' 'y Si,' w --11 co 0 O n' j I �.� ��Ca D • ,, ---.1::-_-.3c::::, � l w x�� �I 13 T �� odd I I u � ��� V ,I 2 n 0 .g o I �� OHO K 0.33' cg. o w i'::::.: yV 11.17' 6.64' ti 13.81' m I ° ^ a LIMITED CO 101"1 i I I 11 i7-e'r",0 '0 .11,. 5.72' 4j �J.� c I. E EAIfiN�ST l I �p;; m NN - ❑ C -� rev U a N,\-031\PARCELAJ\PLAT\ASB-4.0'.03/12/99 BEZ 12 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: April 7th, 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: David Marsh, Planner I SUBJECT: OV12-98-21 Vistoso Golf Casitas II Landscape Plan, Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 11, Parcel AJ,Located West of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard, and South of Vistoso Highlands Drive BACKGROUND: The WLB Group, representing the developers of the Vistoso Golf Casitas II, request approval of a Landscape Plan. The project site, some 3.3 acres in size, is located west of Vistoso Highlands Drive, and is surrounded on the north, west, and south sides by the Golf Club at Vistoso. The developer is proposing to construct 32 residential units in eight buildings on site.The existing condition of the site is mostly undisturbed desert. SUMMARY: OVZCR Buffer Yard standards require a Buffer Yard A along Vistoso Highlands Drive, and a Buffer Yard D along the perimeter of the development. In addition, the Rancho Vistoso PAD requires a minimum of 35% of the site be landscaped or open space, and a recreation area is required under the OVZCR. The applicant has met these requirements, which are described in detail below. The applicant has more than satisfied the open space requirement, providing 1.82 acres of open space and landscaped area, or 55.1 % of the site. The applicant has elected to utilize a 10' Buffer Yard A along Vistoso Highlands Drive. The buffer yard will consist of a mixture of understory vegetation and trees, including sweet acacia, bottle trees, honey mesquite, velvet mesquite, palo verde, ocotillo, and Bird of Paradise. Sisoo is also utilized in Buffer Yard A, which is not on the Oro Valley Approved Plant List in the OVZCR, but has been approved for use in the landscape plan for the adjacent Vistoso Golf Casitas development. The proposed development will utilize the existing golf course 40' Natural Buffer Yard D on the north, west and south sides of the site, which is permitted in the OVZCR. In compliance with the requirements of the OVZCR, the developers of the Vistoso Golf Casitas II have proposed a recreation area for the project. A passive recreation area is provided on the northwest corner of the site, and will consist of shaded picnic tables and benches. The development will also utilize the active recreation facilities of the Vistoso Golf Casitas I project. The existing active recreation facilities have a total area of approximately 21,000 SF, which is sufficient to serve both developments. These facilities include a pool, spa, club house, and barbeque area. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD ACTION: On March 9th, 1999, the DRB voted 7-0 to recommend approval to Town Council of the Visoto Golf Casitas II Landscape Plan, with conditions. GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE: The landscape plan submitted by the applicant is in compliance with the Town of Oro Valley General Plan. The landscape improvements proposed "preserve, restore, and enhance the ecological and scenic qualities of the natural landscape", as required by the General Plan. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 2 RECOMMENDATIONS: 'Planning staff recommends approval of the proposed Landscape Plan for the Vistoso Golf Casitas II development, with the condition that the following general note be added: "The recreation requirements for this development are met through the provision of a passive recreation area on site, and the use of the active recreation facilities located within the adjacent Vistoso Golf Casitas I development." SUGGESTED MOTION: Town Council may wish to consider the following motion: I move to approve OV 12-98-21 Vistoso Golf Casitas II Landscape Plan, with the recommended Staff condition. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Reduced Copy of Landscape Plan ing TIZoning Administrator 11 141 CO kid re! /11 Co unity D - -pment P irecto Of/ / 4 Town Man.ger F:\ov\ov12\1998\12-98-21\LPTC.RPT.doc 1°, ! j i., ; fT1 i b ° g! Jm ' ° ' m rr N $ , h p 7 A D .. _ IiiiHrfilfriii � Rsi� 1 > frn Q ill- 0 g lq i V ----1 fiqrili Will ' 12.1T7 Z V L ! a Y 4 9 - i i. W1 ,',.a. x ; ! iii. . . . . . v f- vg r N S� 1�R A i i 0 v 3 Ps a a. lir ; '' . _ o g gnz ; 41 P r,..._) - ?frit A !' gi ASg •t ' ign O O O D 1 O 1 o o p M ~O O O C ~O N •i IIITTT! m l VP g t i O � 0 0 0 o o iji 7 X C r g RP. A D t � fq � rll ' r n1 r $ I ll ,,: i i ' A If • C-5 / 1 -;.1>. _.--- /./.2 //1 _.. 0 c"OZ4 \ _.-\/ / / .. rim ---1037,, z t7 op / itz.„;,:./... o° , i: /,' 20t o 0 i i X Z W • 1-,,i,..-',.. ) 7 r, 4d1A. .(r 1$...64,1i -./1 ° 1 0 0 g i • --, //."/V . *AA (,/. i 0 0 1 > �� 440 �` � �� �� 000 73 73 a .1', di N•-• / / f�= 0 . zi: MI" 0 )c , te. .a::::,' -1,01:12flta ',,,.‘ t m ...„ ,, 73 ;21 ,,--<,-- 1 ' 4k,It..c)Ny'Vp 0 _.‘, Vi . -,1 ii f --•;‘,"'1.-) 'IP ? ?'P V,7 'wx 52. > 03 z -1 x 0 ,71 > 0 F, ..... , - is iii / N ' . \ (I I.i (-7,---....._ I: n i . i u ir 5- 1. t i li -,,83 . CC` m 7J�^ Ji r 'Z �� - o Z rio(4_ �+gam -, w a_O )-p2c ono -.40 /%144b., - 32'• pillailli I, \ ft I , 4MM - Qay s—pOD is gg v I g gt " Yll Vi:R'S'(')''N Na NP O L '�8 Q:Ou)�0Z !EE __ I° N a • OO ; / _ 0 o / Q3• •>73 v000 mmm•m•0 s,D•Tow a, oMP'i°Pco ®1110 mEI:: m Z 0 o LI O vv —{ v _ / 1 • ,'.,,,''''''(,..„'/',r'i:-- . i'::,,/:C I /ii iliiirdilliWil! iiiiiiIMIlillii 11 1 i r p -T,7-, t 1 . i,I, S �a � , 1 i i i 1 i ri -- i / _____\, 1 1111111/" 1it i ri iiti !F.11 111/1 111,11111;11111111i1110iiii 11P ; �; 1 k 1 i ;i i i qi 1 ill I. i I 1 a - \ I' - ,1 ,4.:774°t\ ( . \.\x Y' •S g__ ( 1 \ /i I , -,ii . ':.,,,\., ‘,- ,..'„,..-.,-------- - ,,,,,-* . I<---31 < i < i si ---- Lei / r.--/..---- t ( - ... ,, ,- 4 ,, /. \_____________N_____„N ........,,,,i_.,...y S _ i ! / Z.— V :,0 ..( i ...I -. ) ).,-..: /- ,, , jt D , .. V _j IN*4 406 To\ ) ‘ ' , .,‘,..„) rj..,1 ‘ ' )1' \: ''.. ° ' / :••••,,-' ' i m / V' _J\ -/.. ..i.r•e \'- SE i i i 6 ,,,,,- ___,..-- ie.. .,\ 3 (1-:-- , to / '1 '�....alMlk u •:1+ 44-7,1, 1eSS\? . .I' / 1' (/ / ::, O t ' I 7m ,,, ,�D(�� 1..,,,>,,,,„,r,,) ,��� tai ,(d r ,,, i 1,/,',; . , ,,,,m, ; ,.., ,,.. " \ /,,, /</ , /r.- V.'S Vi'd,e4._,AtkVlifr . '' ' II/A (s.. ... V z ___,) ,;,--/\. , •-sttor.-9.--:,,,0.- --' ..:‘ \ \ ',...,,u,r, 1 q /// /.,' : - . ' -,.._.--„, (\z„\c" 1 ,t 1 1 FR4473 4 A 9,,/) .' ',11 1---1, //.li' —-0 .18.. / -- to. <, �► if ,;." , --0 Q / ,..,--7,---z�(----\\\ \\ \� e-\o •; .. Par%7--\"" ' 4, /74, ....."-.44.. • ).:_,, • i \ / \C-Vit- ad. � •r1 NL) i./ •'® I III/// -/ �^ I�� s,„ "."r`I' ''...kf-'•____,,E.,•"°,....i,,,,.; „,,,, - �v �•••►'j i`� P{ "ti11) / /y/ \ ,s' ` !\,,„ ; ,„' -, 2,v:t•I \ .,,,,. ..,s4.1.-,„„Aw.:4,--1., ' ,-- ...-: . . 7-,,,,ex...-,,,..e.......... -. aro,. .-',---.,,-% \\ ,..,/ ",, /0INIFtt\r\ Arfhire.,' 34,40'''.-------141171PteillW -.4n may. 1 ,� x,",3 Z 1 i -, ...„., , . \,,, ,. .\_:---- - / ,,-;,, 40Z/07-aa;*7 4,R,It, -b to 0 , • . ....,„ ,, „ . , ,...44,,,, , „trio, ...,,„,- .., ,. i --N-_,:„.- . - . tokt,,..74:7-, to 7'37 -.”41,-• . .......___ ___. ,_ , , x „..)0 , \ „, -, „. • \ \\ •, •/.• . 44`�'�•7,1.19• \ „ , AIL -'- \ \^,r ' .1.. ,,\ •.,--\ 'te_ *\ _,,i,, , . \,, - . r;F /. ,/ L 1 ,&,,,...,....„,,,, s, .reiv,--__ -, -- ....m. ,., , •,.:. ,,, \\ it), / Alt•- /` f ` 1.11.•\� �` ~X � r \: \ ```\ ` 6 s:\2. 0 '• -;:\... ‘. • \ ��� �•.1. ` •— ”.• r4ejr \ :~tt'\ `'�a� �•i/\p`� ��♦ `\, \ . - , -4, \;--i.,-..t.,--, , ,,-...,. - o/e�r .• mac. <I`�• ie �' `,�-- �\i'"\-\ L t� \ *YS' ( ./.' -.' ,;_i ;4,- .- --,. , --,. .----,,,,.._,-,1,8„..., \gip; \\,,,„ ,„.. ,....:, ., .....„ ...-.. ). ,., , ,...,,, ,itt.z1,-,. kovoilk, \ .1 \---.1,.. ('''7' ?,,,''fr-_\.Ki "' .-g � ` % \' I -▪ -w„, _,.,_,__,,_,..., � ` � �} t'\�` ` 1 \ i // ; Ii 'a ' ,,,, ..„ , dH �� 1 — ,_. i�+ '? , • ! \ -.-",..7,11.' / r4A' v '~i/J45,• .....As..\§-,.. '1m .�t 4W ./-• - ,�- . , , } a . , \ as._.?,7,"4,t-,,,,s,....mi'. . , ...,,; %, , ry'''••-/C'N N., f.5..1 •' .diveo*Zuriot.".e.11. 1 ‘. )<.P.. X •\ , N. \ g4i:1 •1•�;• j ..N •►rr►•'�4l.iM� —�j--,r'?-44Z�p �,; �► `� !- cC� .1 ' , � •It.--*-pti4k,o' �. :�0�. nt 'Q� `�` /. •- 5-- \\;_t___,..,,...- -4 �---� l , {o..--' \ r� '' ` / __'_� -S�- -- v.......‘.6‘N.-r.2:1'! '\, \\\\'., lI\* 1.11 1 4- , : .( ���.�i�`i!� / ► /moi `-7.L/l(-/ / ;, MI 1' g z .> \k 1 \ \; -\''s..!---- vi- ‘•;‘=•f 4::Nf ' ' Tif' ' \I /' ' -—-1'40e..........* i / ' 7 -(1.-/-/c , z„? , / -- -• 7 6 0 00 \ z.� r.., / l / .,-vii.,,i,* .›... . - -„fP(. ..,•lyS0**e 1 / / / r•- 1 k\ ./1,7/. 40, �• O v o r*, view/iii?!q,,:ts 8 g c) i?': -. - \-- a .4.::-7-- 4 cf....V.! . 5.4 P. r8 X01^� � / / •" / .'/ _ C 1 • ;!Irio 1 I// iii / .\\- / / .. ,/ / .ti' l /l "4 .C3)ill>v)z (>5/�w .44 <9 = npgY = c m � / / / ! XiNj I - g '2 - , __ ,, fr. / / �f/ // I,/fi/ r�� ND ./L /I icg'S/ /1 / / 7 / "' / / ri 113 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: April 7, 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Valerie Feuer, Senior Planner SUBJECT: OV12-99-3 RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 10J, THE INN AT VISTOSO DEVELOPMENT PLAN (LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF RANCHO VISTOSO BLVD. AND VISTOSO HIGHLANDS DRIVE) BACKGROUND: The Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development, with its associated land use map, was adopted by the Town of Oro Valley in July of 1987. That portion of Rancho Vistoso, known as Neighborhood 10, Parcel J, is located on the northwest corner of Rancho Vistoso Blvd. and Vistoso Highlands Drive. SUMMARY: The subject property is bounded by Rancho Vistoso Blvd. on the east, Vistoso Highlands Drive on the south, and the Club at Vistoso golf course on the west and north. The Vistoso Resort Casitas are southwest of the lroposed project, and Rancho Vistoso 5B, Monterey Homes, is to the east. The existing condition of the site is mostly undisturbed desert and a wash along the west property line. The site is approximately 18 acres, and the net building area in 6.54 acres. The remainder will be open space, far exceeding the 10% requirement. The main building includes a 5000 square foot restaurant/bar, 14,000 square feet of meeting rooms, and 1500 square feet of shops, as well as reception, administration and maintenance spaces. The 232 guestrooms are provided in 26 casita buildings, which range in size from 2332 to 4725 square feet. The site also includes a spa building, tennis courts, swimming pool, and an event area for weddings or other outdoor gatherings. Sidewalks link the casitas to the parking area and the central building, while a decomposed granite trail system offers a scenic walk around the north and west sides of the property. A PAD amendment was approved for the site by Town Council on March 17, 1999, allowing reduction in parking and increase in building height at specific locations on the site. Forty-six compact parking spaces were approved by the Development Review Board, as required by OVZCR. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD ACTION: The Development Review Board recommended approval by a vote of 5 to 0 at the March 16, 1999 meeting. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 2 GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE: Staff has evaluated the Inn at Vistoso against the General Plan Land Use Policies and finds the project to be in conformance with Policy 3.1F, maintain and enhance Oro Valley's residential/resort/recreation character. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval of OV 12-99-3, Rancho Vistoso 10J, the Inn at Vistoso Development Plan, subject to the conditions in Exhibit"A". SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to approve OV 12-99-3, Rancho Vistoso 10J, the Inn at Vistoso Development Plan, as recommended by the Development Review Board, subject to the conditions in Exhibit"A". ATTACHMENTS: ' . Exhibit"A" 2. Reduced copy of development plan F:\ov\ov12\1999\0V12-99-3\DPTC.RPT.doc f) -- N) fv I. . ng and Zoning Ad ini trator i //4 014 ommunity II= ;lo;ment.1 irec or i FAlIAJAlI kAtt- _ 4 own Maria. -r EXHIBIT "A" TOWN COUNCIL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 10J INN AT VISTOSO DEVELOPMENT PLAN OV12-99-3 1. The applicant shall contribute fair share funds to the cost of future signalization of the Rancho Vistoso Blvd./Vistoso Highlands Drive intersection. This fair share shall be based on the percentage of total traffic this project will contribute to this intersection. Details concerning the collection and holding of these funds shall be worked out at a future date prior to issuance of a grading permit. 2. Correct the number of compact parking spaces in note #4. V I< N f Y 0 y P 0 K '3 0 a x Y p P P ►► i N N f Y M P ► ► P N u r >TO q' q ,�.> y= �; �Ir ',> �crs R T {Q� sy' �� $a� d�,#�I g$qIRTPma) g V 1 S7Sa ' Giq ''' iIqi1� ifi F L Qy I H i;I" AnIi /i'l ..i3FAl, >,;A\��4 ii ig i"� A$ �q■ A '12 11 ly� R������� °�GR6 ��� �A� �a4 � yrgo on.> iilli ����; F� � $`qR� ��"S�€4RRR dAg F� a $_ � : � �� a � ! � rAI,03- Ff` _ 1R >ig$ tPi=4 wI R 3 ■ cC�Al SGp� 6ARFSNI:L: ,II116t$ 1'Z€: : $ _ R L c B -�cE_1�8Ra I�F R F aF P R $� �IP 2, S E__;�a g w a a S €d 1�rL$ F II $$ 9as i a ?Ibb� R q� aAt A� ��q �q a � C �� 8� �� �R�� a,���R � ��_ $8� Q� "$�� � 4c � ���a��R�� ppp� F� �` NN � H € !4...„:;....1 �a �w•�p LwQ�tl' '' ' Moaq'� � R``-�gFE 10Li1 I S 1 1,pm i _.A dM11 1 G-� 4 a 14 f$$g i x� si:' ;; =-x RN$'3 -3."-8 N iz . ;` llt 1$i i 4;0 $41111i 1/13XRE3 $_�1 X I aii a$__� dR R R r 1a < _1 a_ =4 go f ,'is 1: tlR 17 � ?;� ' li ,An S F q " i6rA Ar= - o ':�4���€�w� � �1 � � � � �il � ai� $� �s :lib; i����� H A �"� � �c� a �R ,.� �t r a„s� 7 � �S a� � A �� € �=a �� � Y�$ E� �� i R��>5�` qbli: � !°cn � $ � �c� { NF�i 3i plcto � l7a II q 8 '-$ ! N ��1 !=k " N R�{ i �F Y��Rw R y, .Q @ it19 R F F 4 p - F _S Qo f$=i g F"g i c iAig"• : ti1 !pt a " >i 'ix i •4 1 A[ z t Q R ; it 1 Si 0 g ' G a =,1� I- Ig a',o W g Y$ p !g I' 7 2 t W g iqg la i , i I 1 I - . ,t .1 p , '1.,' : . " A A 1 ,, i ._. i O� _16.:. _ , .. IAAL i ►AAL ro . , j q cn'eorx 4 '' s # if bl4 . 1__. .._.. 119 _ _. — — — — W N E 1 W ( I 1 it II }rI grave p g to /;.►�:.I 111 I s to ► -___t i ..v_rpi,.\ 0: - f0 11 ll N5-..3 -cri:'��. re r. 1 11 .--,s, s‘ ii-e:\ •0 le\k\\\\\ \ ._ iiii„Ivi_..,.."3.14, . _, .. .. ..b4.0„..... igE 11 ..,.,__it :„ \ \\'\\\''',\ ,C 0 --r- F,IL , q i= ------:' •04. ____\_\ \ ' '. ___Th_.....__HtillfW.0#19-1 Al d N Et-,-_, .�,_ ________4•.--'-•-..,_..: , . tt fe - ...-14-4-"' �,z ..-- =%� 1;\.:' ./���.: � \ o•.,, N-ili � ���w r 41,12:4:r.'j Q ��. `3 7 �4,-..;.....-1,�'A' - m=j Z Q �� II I i fy� �� ���0'/��f :�ILF)e- 3. r,- rZZ,N f 4-4 il riii - I4 0 0 • I`° m r-t ..`"`-.'j1o : �ri rwNr m� l (I ,o,lit --o (.:;, ' , rn m —-- — 111 I n -3 ' 4N4tii I A) 7, _.__,..., /4,\As.", .-ea.-;.---,- , t) 1__ __.. AN* , . g _ s__,„_ kliv e b�� � `�`}' `� FIST •\`‘ - , Ijç • Z 1= 1 r / W r�,.` t Xi V *•40-,44k4k% ry 4�.$ SRP0 \ - gli 4,A4k4),,t,,o,ait'M,-.i.-,z-k- --r) 1 : 1--‹ ,,- ' j',/rst/ 'r< N Ns'N -- ' \ ' - i, k -N. --,,,;, -- ,4 Z _ —,_ ?, , x c„„ sc ,.. A. �A.kP'�' ie„,:,.a-,,,.-j;q,ttt. /O I =I'id t, ,,____--, -1— W -19/1'\ rotk ;( N; 1 A v in Vs 1:4 Qg 64 ,w kirg wVtw+ w�! S+whiw _q �Q !. 7 i- u•i.s r � 7 ►-g �•�,:. L 1V1 7., 1 1�7! OZ > 2 1 / { m Oo W O n O,. v z •• x OoO4D4D 1 I 1 ' IDmN .311.,>—"' � a ^ l` • ,Din .3O.,nZm I'm I I cd i I 1, o��� w ` �� 'oeo =oO=ZO 53, o . �OI •- • :�u zz4(n C�OOD ''''''''''1,9,� -1117111 A :a< � C-AK A O mxno - mNmm _ m m m zmN vog cnm �m� mD � `�;/� nt Oro wDoNm (4-c'" O O ➢ Om mn DO> 7 Oo m D -i m mn IO �Wm15-c� < . � o ,ND D�nTQ�2 Do �m otop r Z f3 n D m S O � m �, Z m g 000 t,i 'OOo m�rnTN�� P'' . S4 • m r8rO8nNN ' -v �---�--O-------,TL�O o N m›c- (nZ mm O P. 1mn r r Ea .rmZi Zzropn Cp N = rN^ —1 Zo (' >D z �+ omm oO73 80`-lot - zo 6 �r14-412TxN f•71. Z 0 0 m r-,11 < Cm P- RRzRR. cR 2 .. zz , = f. l . R ifN rv � Z Z Z o ➢ m C m 4 ' R=rnm om ci D F = W r8 o _ U 4:. ,? o n mm mO z U A N:\185050\NEIGN1D\PARJ\PARJ-TI.DWG ,-) A'N ,„,, .. ,, OI 111 (x, -(T1 1 I ( • ,,, 1, 'x: , .. ,, s.„ N. \,iiiiii--, 4 J / .: t, i ' . , � -_ /. , ,`x_ 111111 _ Ars I �� 4� -r_� , . _.._ `'�' 01 1 i T C , �N 4_,;:- \ 7,„. ON IIN :-.___... _ frgC1 1� 1� �. +u y g t�8 I r/ 1: . ,, , i -- - y f ,,, 1 .. __. . , i. s ,„.• ,, ,_ , , te . , 1 zo J • 1)) 0. '.:.:..§. \..,— ,---',-' • '-:. ' '‘ ' it„ ,_ , \ - ,:§, +$ . ‘10\\-- --- .-,J__‘:_,,i- — t ,.. .. 1 _:_, r 1 li.i. „.., . --44,..,. .\.. ,l e.,...._—_. - li, , .- fr 51 g� i!, \ -I 2-4-- .- ,-,, + i_. .: `__. of k i,„1,, A _ 30 , lazak,,..tiAiistii,:,, ,,...44, ,...y 2.-- ,,,,-.4,:,” ./---;qc..-4,--- z LN.)1A111%14A — '406'.t"..--a:" ('J''''-:-'1-2.i ''7'7;--1 . . . b D Q F �+° I rI�����'`k.s ��„�!�2L`!�('���' frtiS`.• 't "` y:.:r'j c IP191.W.44 ..-_,-401-W.4 . . 4.P. Iiii I, Elli; & 1\ - H.., ,§ 1 itio i I I 1 T VE y, �� - u+t1�rue► 1 II T Moat b it)i\X\1 • r' b • 1 ii vim. w i-"1 k1'rrC\ •IN" '�- ��"� r` \ ''''4,:'--t, ''--- A*....liro•, ,/ �- .> 4© ! +t►� ," 1„1..x., kitPkvirami �� • � alMirifili.milt-etevA ,,,Afen I„11 ., c /1.� ^ '1.•1 1......., mow..- m I., ---,.. -,...,4.4.4_,-;c40-74;,,,„*.-4,/r,:-,T A- ,i,e, i, r.,:. 7.. ,:,.. 00.....- , __ - . - us ..... Abigriip. v,..c., ,cr , i --_,,,7 .Akv ,.. ), ,- , vieWr: `, ........6., ,,,,, " . k —111trk) ,!Z-11'.',.---- ','ell `M� \N.amoni...*Valliiikk". ♦%'�`:_' --,.„,. , . Vii /►t-1.- �.. -' iirl%--"te-*1121'71t4's •..--1, (. V441-4 NI.' WywtilOW' liOrewril I , 3 •/ clic; % 2L" _ • �� ('I` ! _::,�.. �' 't ; 1, 44.c,,,-A-4i fr,*,•!:.i,v4ktiktiTt-.,7-.; Illitiligtalt t ; o opi. f -• ci-- I,' � � o m o0 2-. _ I moi.! 7 e ��` `A� -R�>: ��lti���:�j� // ',/(0)',ft*-1P1,41\t'.*:frilitTrr4' ' BLDG.' .'a t,y .,-1,. ,- ,,w4-1/ „., q,„„A.• ..,.....7 -- ---....- / i 44*...;?..; >v -i 6• 7 �. I 1..40„ - r '/17 .�c����� ���.�7�I i—_I , At: wir.---4,,,,,,Nt,,,i,2aitV/49-- ., . .row.- . -1.- a NW-7,,,,, / A "---.- :, -:___,4 :14,„,....r, ..--- I': '>♦ 1 1, 4 n7 A. / / .7.,a :s/ (�` i ''AA , . — 1-1.1.1.” iti ,�,, LTJ ,4 :2:I i pt,'I; i it /-. < c.-- _,,..:7:- : : , in ' *k1/4„, ,,,,,,,,4 _ raw ' • // / .. --_r;. : . . - v 101 !1P • 1 . —— .'"---"\- '' c ( 11/444, ..,. .A.,...................... ,,/7 .: — . :: . - -4�li, SI ��' ` ;� / / rii;___ ' p r _ l I k" � :. f" o o i or: T 4. .1-t pip' 11- 7-.,-. I • af: 7—'0 d.. 1 11 1 i II il. 9 T' 11- is /ft i 1 2 A.i r.. p. ID Ilk ° (1 i, I R ,17 4 jiiro,...), '- *I 1-' ' 4-- i. / ...-., , .,,,44, .... ,. ,,,, ,, f., ir..... . . _, , 4_,‘-- I p-, mir4.,,:: 4....4-06gige?, ,., . I M c^� � N9+ �7.. G 07, -.`'1� F/nom' � ,;;"� (/�\ 2' .! I II I 0 !II:• , .i, -it,.. 1"11.i ,,aa,A..I cA ircn— ---, ,. , , . z . '''' I :- • , __,,, ..c .0 i'llitracjefri; i / `/0 n 1 1 ''' 1 hilrflpir ..,, , 5 .. ..." -_. 'XI t..4,15.1,,,( -- ' i ,. 47, '‘ \‘'Ik,............iirdiiliki,ii''‘i J , , , co 0 •''IN .,:t ' \ 7 ivirciii / i 1 ,', .,:19./ .,, )‘„itr41,4) g. .-,%, .., 0),„. 7,...„,,AN,. i \ M O __ . , .,,,, ,, -4- , _ , 1,7N,,,,x., t ,.° (/ C %:,.ii'''— � _ 1 i �� �. fi � '� ..... , 1 • - , ', ..;,, -,;. " /� �#r�te• �� �, . \ i' N .,o• o _.i6660®®0®®O®0 0 I gvnnnnnnp Nit -q• k .44.t .' a -- - ''- I•' I z R1 x� D ,,1 f f f 1-�-i-/-1 1 N-i� '�' /� {Dv, �I� , �ormr ;v,Imm mmrzn+uA' \ `4 �""Dv •s mI� �u0� =O=� vm-IN�rxi�>;ff�fo �= w � �`\-�e �,BJt� �';� ih.:- �� i }*cI m�pD mr ,,74A"off+_!� �0 ^ �. _c Ex.mm O=OZZZ A l . y 1 " M � e otli. Opo= rin- ciia`nu' .p}�". aee/- .0 .tom •, ,• ♦ , a ZAIn O_.00 �� �� . mxA�o r^ � *: � \\ •�� �'��+moi`� ' '.: i r+l 4" t' a � •� _ K w f,q1,,,'4,11,1qg g DAN `41';`)(7<k" DON ZN .� 111p�pp�r� n \ ,q ‘`,:\,,,,\ \ �•` �i'. ��� \\I; \! '� .� ' 1111;‘-')' Z irsO( N ;>Iii,IN/1,.%,;.,;) m Z-T rn \' 1`\4 `. YI, l DOO �D�O�, m--fliNN D m �r-rZ s' n' \O� '\1 \\.,.„,\\,,,,:-, ,,,___..,. \ _� Orin -or- 0� �^ v gg m .A • > ,F,z• .\• :� �\ \'OdV1l\'', -'_'.:9n o m J _ \ H . ♦. uko A 2 W I • P ,,:.\ -4,: s'` -1 ('i ''''' *Oi• ft‘, y ' '-..:-7 --wis ,.._ •,. ....,_,- - P ce .8, . 1 ., ' 2',' •/t'. / a. " , ....--..„ • , . . . s'....A - „.._....,, - gill•„I-., \ f :'1,1* ' ,,,,,3, 1 . /,,, 1'ft Arlo,(,/,' • :,- (f) ',... .._ • ri, 7+-, c__ ----;. - --' 02 • , r i;;4•4t''' ' '.44\'''\., '., r • ;• , \'•,. \ . TR. plY' rn > ';"' .,12.••'_ , t29, ill II, R 11 ., _\ •-•-g: § --...; I ' Ig. ot, Fell 4- 'I 4-',.:\,c,- • r;,1§: sif f - " 't ' ',A 's\-. • '..:3,--&:, fi''.; gi — t., — , it wi, : i i 1 r F , -N ‘`.- N .. ,.....5I1 -.. , Or -7,- ipt,..., _ 8 r. w -... i ___„,....., . ____ ,.. _::. .-- 4. ;., ri - - -_,__-_--.=..dis : ,_ ___ ,, .....n..... b. ______2. - .. .. _, 44,7" . ,......-.... -_,., i,....11411P111. .1. . -__.-,-,-,:: •.,',. -LI:4 _ - . I1 -g 1 `.. ' - - A ,-14- - •- .__L --, - - , ‘•,------/ ' • '4;- ' ." 7---- - ,,:•1` i 401111• -÷1-,--it 50CFs ., • / OA 7..,A c , -:''',1 L.I-1- ' ' ,,,. 4! 4 -i _Apply --- gh.. 1,,,, --,- -,',-: P''''S ' tr.,,,,Mik $ 6,, ..... ------. _ re& 8 1. -f -.Wit:----- , --:f--- FP' =--------- , ' _ ..4 hr.......,‘. • ---, *91i16,4!.......yorlt\.. vig 1 lipli„6-- k iu li ',O.,Vi I_ 1 J.. rim. :,,S77:8•-; :miptii;fr ...°7'.P. -- (r) r ‘ 0, 00„. it" i %-7404" r, ,/ •,•utent 1 % "'IC__- ."- , /// i c R I 1 s 1 ii r -V z \ 14 \ -§, . :. ,, , ,s, , ii, . A 11114 Ti .. 1,.;*0 -i-. :32 , - ; 1 t., N gi: /4 1- 41 ,,,, I • § g r 5, IME‘ ' IIIc- 1 0„ , • -6 ......., ,, i ' ladValliffl• 0 . fl 'i 1 7 _,, V ,," 4771-----.;•-•%:-' im AtAiftlr , _Nr ty dipko --1 . • ..w, 2 'A \ r‘ • 1<_/,'- 1 • . .• - -- 1111-:i:1111i1161*Eff.r Pi „,..... , ...,..„... \w „, ,, .........,.„_,....... ...,............,,..,..,...,,,,,,,,,„,..,,,,,,ti .,:„., ,_rAll ,Nrailibb..4.1 ., ..,.1'r,,. - -PI' oniemi, _, i\\,\A ,\?, k\,-• .:- ,8.- e-.6, ,,c,-„,,liagig- Attisa. • . ),,T, 1,--.400 :-.,- ,N\-\‘',. t'.\, ,4'', 1*1 ...;-.,),l',(' rPg""4 * rilliT --&Lei.;, ... , ..v ., , i .. 0 . < _ope. -,--- _ , t - \\\ ,,--.• 111 if t °. . i 47. , o , ),,_,1.44* ,„ - m ,c-k.,\ \ -;'' 'fi'd -- •ipVii ' ' \, \ - AMI" / a hl - 1,. r.-___,, , -te - I i' 1 ,,,girtre ,-61 4/.. , ,s. lisito, , \\,___ .,I‘ .,• 4t, -,-. _ ,.,,.. , , ,..,,,,,_,"__.- gi 1 ,,,itc, 4 '.._: -;,'„lb ! I . 1.-, l' lit it. -4 i \ ,",,,:Pr.,i," dr -...'‘ ":. I ----`-7-- abir:y 4 i , -4t, , 14r• 40"_ I /, . ,,, . 7-;- tovitii4t*-,,T4'i-1-,-41544, i 41 . . .. 'qir-,•.'_ „ :'-'''IN,,g3', ' .",I'', 7--:-..;',"' itOebtbatli '''4 Al :7111 4 ' . ----__--- ..-- - -- ..N ,.....- A -,1 . ,,,, /.i.. iii..,, 0 • . - CD -_-I-4 :-,-.1>!,,,e.i;_,-(0-_?.. '1,0";''',_.--,.,- ''.. ' ,0 '%, ,.r. \ .",i,',,, •' "4-1404f " I ; ...IP -..-,- r--0 -- ---,-- -.-.-= —,- 4e,- , ..'i - -.... , . •-,-- f • ,. f, ; ____ ---....„.:...-- -.--:.-iz..is--.-- ,, • D, II,„,-"A•I IV 1 ii, ,- millipli • -.4.; Si'- . II • 'c rt. , PPE' giggi ,.- i • t.. '4- "., ' • II. .re r. 0dpil -,,t lzocli •wiri-iv giii - acz04 ° 5.'' i,, ..• --,'W . . -, . . •:: 1 . --- itt • , = _'. migtalkfillEA.2 ! ' . .--\ \ ' , .; L.--•. -/' i 11,0. Ili: , /41 '''4141114IP‘....\''M I 1 ... ..... ..---- . •i -......,,ar....... .:,y i .,,..i.... ,,,,,...4._.... 1 \ 1 ' -.'''. . '''\,_ 40 .111•7 Ft:`IFT.-tAFW / 2 T. ---., ;....--.,„.. o ' -,p, I-0 tit • ---_ ; , • .. , ,-E , ..- AL. 1 , - H h-- '' I- -.. . 1 • 't ,..- , 1, . --.'....' - , 4 7. , I Ili I 11 -1 .:'•- lig. tr , Ill 4---* . V, _ I -r-----,-77-121.7"i • .. -__---- ,, • , <.---, "4 4 1:L.:J.,- _...,' --......i..j: ... ___ ,...., s _—_.,,, _ 7- •_,,,\_ --.s.:L,_ _:, pi mil --/ , - V s, 1/11;)k @ . r - - . • . 1 ( -: ;; i ' q 1 itow /1. ,. ! -N. 'Jo II/ I, ).--- . 401w.....0,. 1 • • .L._-_-__,..2_._,÷........., ,._. -.---,-.f,, r•i , (1 r l'"/ill 1 •• ,--- ,I /' z-/ -7 i 1 r u) • . , p, .., 0 , ri __, , k ' ' , ., _ 1,ii •Z1,c,(1. ,::.. -r .: . . .1 i li -----.' J'd 1 •-,- i 1. 1.: _ , .1 -• . „ . , ,,, , , . - , (,) .f .. . • • - ' i E M - APIIIMINIft...----' / / , , ., • • ..••.... -,.., ---..." .......n.......m.......... rn / / •4Illk • // / / ',/ . ... • n (. , 4--.-02.;:--- g ,.._..,_ __•-•4.... , . 1-4> ©ggewgeg000 e '''s -'----- -‹.----- - 4%,‘ ,-•iii,\A\ al..' 'V "F N9' a , .......... ...„..............„_:-....._ . .. --,. . _ ,,,, 1;:-.......„,c...._„..41-,.1/4,-, . -.- ..-114.4,,, ... .:..-,3 -,4 r:Hng?g.i..)-i . —_......,--• • - ,.._— -_ -• ---,_.:,., -.AE,,,_ • -.. —A- _ lot, :tn., 22,2F__ r,,,,6,1.ri,pi Pi.....R,:.;.,...'''- , . ' / 1/ ..., -- . _i l i '•i.-z•--•.. ,. •-7...„ . .. ' -:::.68,/110,,V 1'41`Z..,... .s7•*4,, '114- ..c,mriel ETSCTA `21-1 r2ii:::;-`11%1 . I ' I - & -'1 , 1/' :""/P,j•-• ifi, '‘‘, ,--‘ -',R''':„ ,'''''' . %,(4*' ,,,..i ''',-, c/ • 7, 861i 181'2-,1, ...,78.'4,U,',,''ficie-?...\.:.-1 ' . ,__-,,-1 -• • ,\ 4 . f "", •.,`N -.-13>t,--,Lkf,, ,/ 11 . "- ' '''r - 'U'j• l' '''''‘,'.. . s' '''',«- Al ` _....„-_, ± ' ;'. I.,-'111VI-1-‘. t .ca I , --. • '- - - 7,-1. - .. taits,) .72.(7,-,K - -_;:71 t g P-a•ti 'A. 2 '' ' ' ' "' ILA 1 ' \ 'I( ... '' / - '. ' i.'6:""-' ‘ m-\1. ''',.', „. El Z Po)#,...4=2 p!, sq'r.:,: , A, ,, , , -76, -,-, - gai /1,;,.,._ -. 2- - -- --5•,.iivT , , '',1-. '' . f.915 N PI;`o;(2 F; s.4 .,• i -,-‘-'- '11, 4.1-41---1:.:' 1. 1-.' , ,' ggi.) - :7,,,, ,- 2 X p8p00-0 ' .xl-itt A ''' LL)----- ,...). 4 ‘\:t''‘ ( litivi -7---- --41k-' ' ' -• ;1•12 '''0 'NI :• '' . pot vie m ,.... Vc rl, 8 8 , 2 N's‘, ,--------'-- ._' ,_. , ) ) , • e N -;„,,,,,r' . ,.,, ( r.',,-18 , -•, ,,,, ,-, <ri z Oz y p T ..- 1\ ,',I. - q', ,-‘ i ,- (-i.,, (7) \f- :, ' W O 33 x•''., '` . c.„....a • 3 - - -r1-- —1;, ) --co-_ ',/ ,. ,- ' k ' -i . ,/"), \ — t (L) u, , • 14 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: April 7, 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL FROM: Valerie Feuer, Senior Planner SUBJECT: OV12-99-3 RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 10J, THE INN AT VISTOSO LANDSCAPE PLAN (LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF RANCHO VISTOSO BLVD. AND VISTOSO HIGHLANDS DRIVE) BACKGROUND: The Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development, with its associated land use map, was adopted by the Town of Oro Valley in July of 1987. That portion of Rancho Vistoso, known as Neighborhood 10, Parcel J, is located on the northwest corner of Rancho Vistoso Blvd. and Vistoso Highlands Drive. SUMMARY: The site is approximately 18 acres, and the net building area in 6.54 acres. The remainder will be open space, far exceeding the 10% requirement. In addition to the required bufferyards and landscape islands, the landscape plan hows plantings around the casitas, gardens and pool areas. Bufferyard D is required around the entire property. A forty foot natural bufferyard will remain on the north and west sides, separating the site from the golf course. A ten foot bufferyard, using the approved desert trees and a six foot high masonry wall, is shown on the two street sides. About 54 palo verde trees will either remain in place or be salvaged for use in the bufferyards and within the site. Trees and cactus will remain in place at various locations at the edges of the site, augmented by plants and hydroseeding. The applicant has proposed to use a number of plants not listed on either the Oro Valley or ADWR approved plant list, to be used only in specialty "oasis" type situations. These plants include ornamental pear, evergreen pear, Australian willow, citrus, edible fig, crape myrtle, photinia standard, sago palm, and cycad. As required, fact sheets have been submitted for each of the plants. Sidewalks link the casitas to the parking area and the central building, while a decomposed granite trail system offers a scenic walk around the north and west sides of the property. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD ACTION: The Development Review Board recommended approval by a vote of 4 to 0, 1 abstention, at the March 16, 1999 meeting. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 2 GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE: -Staff has evaluated the Inn at Vistoso against the General Plan Land Use Policies and finds the project to be in conformance with Policy 3.1F,maintain and enhance Oro Valley's residential/resort/recreation character. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval of 0V12-99-3, Rancho Vistoso 10J, the Inn at Vistoso Landscape Plan, subject to the conditions in Exhibit"A". SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to approve OV 12-99-3, Rancho Vistoso 10J, the Inn at Vistoso Landscape Plan, as recommended by the Development Review Board, subject to the conditions in Exhibit"A". ATTACHMENTS: . Exhibit"A" 2. Reduced copy of landscape plan F:\ov\ovi2\1999\0V12-99-3\DPTC.RPT.doc fl briA- , IU r\-(t: s ,,, / P P . 'ng and Zoning Admi istr ior i i k p$ A► ', 4 .444 ! 09 Co LIf ity De . : ent Dir•ctor own Man.'Per i 4 EXHIBIT "A" TOWN COUNCIL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 10J INN AT VISTOSO LANDSCAPE PLAN OV12-99-3 1. Elevations and layout of entry features must be submitted for Town Council approval. -I. Palm trees whose mature height may reasonably be expected to exceed 25 feet are prohibited under OVZCR. A PAD amendment or variance will be required for use of such trees on this project. 3. Oasis areas must be specified on the landscape plan CJI A W N O , m v CD (T A W N g T,, y � C a0 g�z� D� A>Am mz�g� O� A �D �_ Oim �i Al T r',D P-4,1i. mO , > D % Oom ADs ', m D Oyi,m �2 v2iomo rirz•' <$gzo W-Pra Po > ��2 omF mo m mZ ZOa v m v mpg A m z z mr., HI � my Otj��Cm�A=1Zva� ��c�i� i�•�� rnS �� o hi c�s n > H O� y O D C r;i C O r ii T z O;O b -1 �O Z m f-i i> (sv 2� S n E� i Ao�>r o�y��vmD�+ �,> � mo �� r90' �� m Do� • z cg if-AF N �r��go,v�: Farvl O �� �m � ZZ �� Pr', Am ���� .gNcD ;cD " V„a�V > am4V �zrF h D� -, do z, s i r^ :m 0 3' g m ,W Alm v�1�z a F a T. n'v yr o- � m r^�No p-zi r"m o ) mm mmc m OaOm � Do O~ D 77: x A(D � D DmZO t- Nm ; �m OZO {> 'L,- O OO � Fm uci c^� F �rl� m � m�mm �F �= W A i� v, F��l � ��o g m �o m �.'.� m mm2 O m Ell mo m0 ; j D rriAp a, gi g O $m m D.op _aU1'1 Z- �9 O 7C�L q �C�� O2OD 1 (7,; N i m DO m Z-( � N„ -i0 OOr+1l ; > argz,sz �mz n�Zso� Oz 2iN� c).' 2 z ��i 5 mm > Dy � � Ooc' > � �> � <m n � � m m ; a � y tnmi OC mm Z O D i 0 otj:y NOD rlg1 m N ON m ;A �� 4,0- yn v O� �,nr, �F<- n yOm Z A � D� �� Z ; D r1,:;,; OU1+ mm m� O ZD r "O'D�0lD/1 m m r? 0 � ny 8OA 2 m yD a v c"no i o ;002 n2 ooh ; I>n m 2 si Sp$v' i 2 mz �v� � FT: � m ... ng m � �m r ox z> m0 � A z, o O Far a n 'm� A n r F mi p q ;i xzgy r r*t W rr+l O tnF m r y > �� OO y > zy $ � Cn rOO g m � oa -OR ' I. m oz�; om opo v n mz Z r ;� �� �DVl -nivel ' NI > 4'1o U' l nn [ zczi ul 10 -. i 8 m u� LL'Aps N;-� O•D 0 x 1+1 m -( �> 2TD r 2< m m D 1-4 O OT � in' O Z r m ” ±g F m? = m 5o m P v'o souoi x1 x i A M '1 m Cr N Q yml. O aUl 2 �' o x c)' 6R -I n Nom o i9 v mmO D o. z uz' o m ? FP, Z O 2 m , n m z v m v z 0 v m 1 t Iii I II I 1 li • \ c e m \ asmaw O O -` m . s- \I \ ZRZ: ilir : st411*- --. \sE!<ig,, %% —V\‘ 5A;I,-,J77if,),j'''d AIV , r--.' 1 p:iTt1.i. a \ -i- (11=1:i12 irti :,„‘I :1 Q O g$ m� 11111 \1 t•;, 4%6:41� _0 1 \ Tu III 1 �I' a i:Aer ; o a c7 �I N r `c f .' • 11441P a r 0 o R D m I 7 , �i e� 0 • 1a.L O ' J ,-.,1•01, °V/ n° C tff ° 0• _ - , R fl J o A .401' fj s' ►iST 11:i, • r e��zA 11,z.' 1 v m S hq�r1 x �N rm W kit �_yY��I,`.j�'.__� 4 T�..�ur.�ic D •1 -�vx isms Y+ r .„,.. m Z fn if*,=� c mrn _ A O z g (►t� '!'-' ,r iti 1 iZ� TZ O-).' Ire lyk %,, - r • o wr flIh ..t- ..4_,Atir❑ ��� \�' z :g: n �5 › OH =(c./)) �v1�0 I \ / rW py�� / 840 D 5-7.- 7,1 r-� `tmD �� .' �� ZAm \ f:-...<1.11 AG -7.- .. --7--4041 \0- m . �� .o.r<m �mo �r ^'S �owc v�-o� A�OOZ `:... ,i Q EFv Z , .,Ag- �„ :rA,2ne D�, O p60, i°8e» T .S 2rn rrD� 0 FN gi _ Yy $ms4 ON D Z " Nic: NI \ 'oo < gRI N 15`( a '� A • M 4 I I H 1 tift. .•..• ' . .,---...-.,,.. O m m m I, trO...iron . ipiPlo ----,.. \ , • „ 0.,,.,.,.... D .... \ ,\\.41(6,. ..... : .. Ti _io, ----„,_,(1)...... _„,X.... ...1. 4,,, ;,;/, \--.... %, 00,0 Al'e.°ft/kip'''''• %\ \ ,,,_-.41,0 .Illiniiii. ‘‘\100 . .7.7............„....• C)Cb °OP ��Q o®aAo0 0, tow, ilia,,, � ; ,�`�Oi � ,, -� �� Ti o” �� \. . _ w .„ . 0., , ,\ '� \`�� �� -.4'0000. /' � �j .0*--_,6�0��..:Lr.-1..q.-......t. te-,-_ ..„ �\ 1, ` 7/ �4. ,-0, 1 ,101/ Oar \ \ ' :'i f or;1-�,,� -..._........0, —_ •, 0 .. . \ A\ \ Int ,0 , wi , i 120`_ ,, ,> 4a.'- _�_I IIi � -if „. �i �AN ,, _ _�- poi � I 1 _ + •. `�- t t , l�G�' Kos - —1—/ -11_i_,-j-;0 r-� 4 0 m 4/). +� •\I(, qv,- -.I4''�r �,:,Y ! 0 Q�if q�v , (` ' 4. , ,,” ��7�' 4, okw.) , ---."..-- , - , , („• 0 \ iii i m �Zzom ;',, •L, ciN 'Y�Yr 9,1 :r `'7 =• ilik x(,:,I s .,. , ) i-#_ `✓ ; simprioa A 1 tlipv 0%`x!41app! I 4 \, , - '� �O O.0)a►,�`Ir, 0 !,-: ��� �'-,----,-,-,-\..)--- - • _- -tkro., ,y, • (ED) i, '..c.,_,Y'..0,,,, fi \ I %IA.) :440.W.h., I 0 47 vti '''‘'s ' I\' \ II rat t„,,,,.,... ,4.,.i,',,, ,3_, ii 0. ' -it. - i1 '\ � iil 13'4 110 11'40 1 �a m ±ika � tip, `c0' *E%�,►�' 0e�0 1'\_ I (�0 i� \ II 1�I� ��// � � �'� �•► .a�`� O � 1 01`1,-',.- � � ,� •IIII\ II I 'll, ••',� _��� i�.�c> �,?�/ O ��',� ,1.� X14`� � ' I{1III' ,i'' •hip i,'` > .� `�,�.�.r O .� .ww/010 tIII III 1 Ijl�� �'l�� -_. •:�,iia 'p" �� �"1v� \'�' �" I /IIIIIIII • 'i,„w" �y/ �, z y •III II I�1' ��"'Y,, _ 41' , "`\ 'O� O1S -+�` a,.........._ao �e/' .I �.'� „, o o �' o O, �� ` j,i.a44 .0./N„,.....---.-- 1 :I.M 444N4111Af 1 1 i i I ' 111 '-- its ik7: -t•' �jr ,. o m * -AV `��4r& '-,> --'','` lip,,gi .410/$ i y / 4i744440 / 71,„ z, , Jo _ Ojv� el III ,I of* / -/ % rrl__. ile Z 4? ? 4 /11. / OAP, DA WO �0 illiiO n , iv, III_ i P.% As) --. ----1,_...Lil) • ' till 1 I 1 ,.;�`� mA :i% •x'141 O �/V 1- 1.� Ill'l I 1 I 1� ` fi ,,, .i�_o 4! v 03 h �i 4o►, = __�►' ��i� 11i i I ,I1 ti l �.E 1► e+ ! , ,,//,/ I '/,i:iaa 6.,i �je p- w V..#6■ '70.. a1 ti f ill !l I I/1 1 1 I,401 kn i`�'I m * * �����O� r, ;.;` 11 I 'Ir;' ;1 %l /,i ���b,� a; A �'� � .� ��' -;.,a 6'Q'a�;_ _.;\1�Oqp f / � 1i I / ' / / /7 '` 0 Mk 011P ti. 7 f m '' i / ' i" \\ eg=:%'r'4AeA, 0WAvitTir-fgc ,,, . iq' r 3 itt ,....! 40r, 1 / / i / /// ,..,OattiePity, mi. ....cialyokp_Sripk--,4,44-‘ 494 a -•-ai ,ii: d,r,"....4.7. 0 ,,, /i ,/ / / /11 --—1'\70.70-11(0/4-0,PRITO Attek41,5":04111:, I" 1_.__ =JAI I 1 iF! r O •� .tiA0___.: I, -wir‘4114*v /7,';7 77',7/ 0/,,.,_ of.%O = ,a- , .D ' L ---------, ,, .-.. , .. Ask irPv---il „---'..17 ____-'17(1,41ii 0 w 1 '''' ,, d. i r,, , _ ---,,,,,_=5.1., vii. ,, ,//,,-, w.44.1' ,... NN ',... Iir,-,,‘/ •-44*.....tTmir . ,,------.:::, -------, -, ,6141 ;;;-...,-, , ..,Fk,•‘-L._I_,' `'1 `1-1,..wp,, eQ- ° a►___ ----=-- a, kI 1 '"-::--.-!'';.%;,:',";;;;;7::'.' -We a"„(Ar. i 1 b V...) , Vc,:i . „ aI w N OZ 6'0,> . ; ,, \ CmAr Cm u1V1- OO • i Q � O �'++1 'f.'-1?) Z �\\ C (,:,,,,,1:‘,61241r4-140.1%, ! Z> .Z01m-C!O*I �D mCm II I O mO1:1* , pry pDp OAmr�S N� ZOZ Dl' ' c..t.rr- vpi0 0X r z w Fri„A-A .-.)§ ,) o z wT Z PJ D Z \ `Z 0 \1 v \ �T JFg D =n �,i_� . t ) \ �4-4* ♦ o �a r <m�Xm'^m zov C to O�,A'2 OOO=n i �\ ura N `. %�;' 0��1 mAc'��o� �o \/ � -1 D ZAN GOO V 7-.�y \�/� ��4 zr22 �= Ei 'O �� W,O<I-1I \ \\ \ t* �mo v rs1 D-, c Ul"Dr- /...2, I \ .d11 z z u • \ a �`.�` m D o z V O p O n-fl ' \ �,� m r kir* N J• R4)..W D D \ i, D r C O 7A o�m O �rzi(n / \ �`�a >� z�mpm .'o O O Z \ Z� OP A . O� rpr M n •M m e°O! .� OD inli pp N 1' (D- i0`ic f :�Vl O i a''j -9 p RRN11 A u O 0 t v * o ;;o 0 O 0 0 -,, .o N� •1, b A N N :0f �D ON ICR7;,- C) Dn� �mA vn g m ' ,, -rD; mA �D fTl p r �g m on ,Mgr 16 �� ZZo e ' m Z m.D iZO r^; c memw Q ib 0Q i1111 , OC'1 C"iVrrmAC7 OON�'U $14-'0911 ➢DD D D DO hi C� �J'DOD"' ��,'r i f �^-(22 'CDO-' r bm CDDOrpr rND � DQODO DU Z b m C rimaa $ 4-'0�C)C) bbrm➢b 2 (� D m c. D D D D D D O O Z b OOZ 22N Z mNc�A mN W(DC-1X 2�Z D -COmCrD--� 4:,;),;,'..;,;,1- m -{Z4! iiii— < m^ A bO i br b Cin C)C)^C) N5,71>,1-',N- �{ A D Z I H DQm bx Dlppo� NC N >➢ �C(C/1CC b DD DD D D 'O DO 00 p0 ,,-_,-s, Z • '. Crr*7O Nn - OA ,,( , .-0 N'D'+2 mpfA�' 2 2W6)ir. r--�N y2� bD I DAD > NXNmmCCFO--IG�NNbb�;rNn0 OO �� T '1(!-,r'71 C7 Z r Z 'n N...D�G� Z;--Zy.-.�.. DA Oa p C b (A rh D r O Z b 8?p O r-',1,^D ^D D r� p e') Z H \` 8('S.✓/ `1 m b O C O ITS �' '' i7,1; r^ gc 2 < A � � m rm • ZC')e7 00 �D77➢00 b D D C� SDA U>f r�1+��rW pD m D2-f...�mZ (7 2 XX:ECC.y N( OQO Cy rclO ��_\ Arf ;N8'D ;mNQD yy F,'pZ /,'.N- Df�y Z<�_ < Zm \�, b >' mvm>m 'r•NNZ ZON OR;O X14:gi 5,NgF6--G1 IC MrpC^ ZC Fr{ Z 'y1,n2 cpC?`" bpO 2 � III �) = 2 <T SCS ➢i ^� Ob0_�. i���y i r�+Rb1 r W O Z ,,-)...A>.4-1 �Fj l v `\\`1\ i m- `D' `m" : 4b? ' / �N 0 z !,-,', m x N I � ?,,,0 i tb' z H s-,„-i., W m x n,"4c V) \ II I o \ H I I U). F2b D 0 II I n 6 --c b ZO O . Mil) ZION -, moo o$ c r D H+ W C Q ,C,4-') ' .N.yx y�l�ANN NNUbb b`b�2 r T r rr�� r m m0f)[7 C)C)A[�nm m b z TAY) .2i-4W C') »api-1 mm➢ O m mcg fn Fnrri, t+1m NOf rrf� Cbb2ZZ���C�CmCOC�C Cp^�D�np >f f>•I f>*1 f>A V>1C OO � -, ��N���oS555x�Nz^o`nNo�yac'r,�or^o�po�mo'^nmp�F�NNNNc�CZ r C �mmDZ)”.”. OpOSpf� ZNNy� SZ'OD-ObHD>C, .r..ZjDNDDyy➢ Db Z IIO N m>� N yR� )bG:ii 2g2 0O� rj D C)0��p D mi> 2 22 m S Z G� V.-2 � m A/72 y.. DF� ODm,.• O;;m r f- -� b � Z py WD Sp...z .-i - V.2pO �yZD bC)�N �� � mX00 CSCpC CCO N _AS-' DD;� C'7 b A Y(n d iiii./ ' D N> N A n-Z1~ZT Nw)--.HI 2 S.N Oi c-2 3.� Tr-Ore>Zn > "_;I: Dtion Z ir, 2 Z�mS^0. Z mb2-�...,b A DDDDW bVOiO�^ XC r^ ry [� i ! '�'O >Z.^-.DD C) A�.-.DN V7 m C C Ci ZZDDZ�>>^O (:p S2 i ._ .ZOI b CZ7�N. >GD Dmt7S � � m �� milb Dy Dmm 0 0 , .� i 1y o•••f r` ' n D —1' N N ^A C Z Z Z 3:Z r D D ^ N D (l T� it -'C >A • •P D7 N r7; 2B W C N OO N_N_> illit, I��I� \�` � � -1 �mZ Z 2 N f*j b bD�� � ��DDD� �` )..,....___ - > O � b m f� 2 p { D�`i o � o P mZp N t v n v m W v v y� v N °.i,' m o. n'� � � T�o � , o e S'u n � ,,, ‘. wfr. i ° o m »,fl .�. O e °p N ° N m11: 0 a N o :.°c R o.c W o 0&O.' : n ° x o o e? c C ¢ j PI C 2 g. rilv a 'o ° n Q i o `o D n Q C s'w i 7 a r N„ ‘ v ,:i D Z 2 0 u o o D �v fel 1 n n a° n° R Do Q °v° v N „ ! ;i ;j y y 3 ,°o c i o f i.R c m c o. fel D < 17j p "�g g N _ 0 0 3 -u r.,°-, °0 '° o R a 3 rl-8 3g x o o � c � 5c o ° 3 n o o$ !” c. o r v Q c Q- ° 'o ^� -c � 3 i o,o n � S � �' �`n,2 0 .1-;-1-5,-,, 'N':,,, p .i °.. °N X C C C U) v of 3 nu : (� N S > �5 if (12,m \� U O n pro II°'n I Tl ' v p� ,,\:-/ * , ` C G7 E 1 c m C �� Z N �'!. N G N V: rl S�p1�OO ynyy OWp V1N LmmCl t7 cony»¢Z f�V'O' m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0(li O O O O O UI s a Cvmvi pC by1>/IAD >C>1 ;rrZ1A�FDm(n A n+^nu0i Oy 7' { O I I I I 1 0 i D �r5C'F'E'g»_ pN Dl+IR''rf>-- <"O Z a C-r=i O I m D O cmmc cyy.�. O N(D� R` (R�rD- DATE c) CO I;:O p p O � .+ r�i D>ppp�nApZA�D Df7��p�����V D :',-,'%,' n 3 n Z V O QWQ N N .Il D rD OO-Zi+1 p�]O�y2--UR!'. �C f� n�y�b� O O O O iN y2r.n 0(7, D� DD> C N� Z > '�C D b ll N f fSl (rr�D> b A n (=jy D 0 D i n � o y t yy yy {n p . ��'-O° Z) C ..-1p1:-ET. D > m < C>O O f��l D b D N j> N Z>C N t>n C N��m z • u o - l^z p m � T >Z 1 m D N Z C O m W<> r p0 O V F.y b O I� .� a sc �v � � c i r3 gN > g> '71 v v ro S z ; A c r�1 z z A D+.r-- m¢ rn D • * N ; N N D n RI 5 ' m�zTz p g (j�� S S v a vzi r _" > 1 O b A N D D O N iv, z > z '' Z a.'� "A"O�AmO ;A f O� TOf�I y O ''O Y D ; 1 D C A y I .,F N C r, ��r3gt zo -VP,,,", r6i sir i o frl �� Og�C' Z m>o�SSg��`^oiq �''zrz,cjz� q uDmi i D N D O C''1 D b r grmcli Vg % 0 Z Oo II .N f*1 > j m= rTi -...T. o-i v N a N;r n t� o i� p 'i> t -.m. m0mDc) ,im>> S k m b`;' f �8b 2 m � 9 S n * �4,1E,P, vm ?? S•r51 nl bc)z� 6����z S z� i A� .EGA AZA o ZD � �'AzZo : mA 2 O ZL'r _�=DZ > YItiD A '9,43'W N A , E;30. V .C r 2 > O .b. O a �m�c Z O=�Z to m ° v z o z i 2 c>> r'1 Z �• m Z T8To oc cin z„N�r� (n z y m a s D c D a t(-A OG=O=n u wn+i c+nm�N �i� .,.,-;,z3::,^,.a + {��m� m z Q z> c c c>i i Z P314.-- � o�o�D OF � � � � Z _ � m m n� < o 0 0 $ s /� W-OC(n �m m m $ m N C VJ D m N �Owo 6' iii,i0F),) �R ^ < CN + O >< n A iA'3na Z /� Z > o -- U) 4AE`:Ke ?C',6 m r-^-t,,1°T � D N 1Mr r-'1Z fl <ri G N D -T io,', c---,:. m\ �g „S g:,!, O9, i : 41 ? ? .7U E ill n eY o'Co 3 to ? N A M .. iii 1° 1 P'11111 ii:11 t ig ,1$ 1, 0e�i.,miz1al a/ka + A 1 : 01 O Iil N 1 lees e 1 ;A Og ii II pi iLl:1 my y .tm 4 • ,,i gi;1 Nil ',,g,i!!iiii: i 11 i 1 1 11 I 1 i i li 2 51 �+,I� �. ,_____ 111111 1 1 I.:111:r' ! 7,3 a ... .... c..A S 5 ;la a A a! li . 1 a • 1 for ' -.--,-.T----:".-7- ......... .y.,..,,',,;*"___, ,,,,,,k,'!-Cs&-.. --------, Hi °' 1M1 :1 : iiiiii i \left f.•;11relaill',t i r- ' •• ,..• ..% -7-1 1 * , 410 ' ... ' .'c:-."--7--', /44--5:'-°-' ',-------2___Q-C) - +, (Piot*. .i..—re,..-,---- ..'. . / ,i----1,-/-z-i--.J.-„ • _(----c--L,--_,-, ,i(?),-:-'-'43,ft, \, AO' :illa.,8112 ... ,--_-:--' ,,,,' ri/I j Pl'TEDir..-7,- :,-A-)--- , i'",(::, L. -;„4------...4 I '‘, MI* " "....."----'7.!_-,..: <ball 14, eft)/- ------•-- ''1 1 I II/(2);,:5\'1‘,. '/.N\'l'"--77:::_,:=,-,,,,,,,,,,,,i'--------'--1!!'7,-_,;:-.7'\ '``, i'•O®ow,- l -� I i� f'11l —�' 1-4.,./.41.:,::_,,,,,,, r/l r1 l ? if�1 — 0 I—,--- -_ \\ \ \ \ efseefif-„,h\ \ __---- 1---;7----wi.,Ili;70 ,I,"Jo,-ells 0_ _ _.,--,, it -, -7,-, \ „, \\42,- . or, -- 40-40,6,44,..---------_ - 4.,.:42. !I ffirr'i, •--9=4..-.-. . IS' J'ilitL,(L--1 --/-",,,) , ii--- \A ; \ \ \'b 7 t P \W) �I! ' -1,..4".P' ' P'�, '� --_-_-'''"01.-;I� 111,1 1 1�ir`� ' ,-- ip �\\‘‘‘,\\\\ -II-- ' ` -( Ii�, ►7� l-.! �- ITir'j ; -I- ,\ �. ;-\` \\ ` i, 1t -- lirr-. , .--, a, 7 - __, , - 7' -=y-z\.'L- / -:::-..fiA ivii '1 ,..11.0,--NC!V Iirk- -: (4140 ,7-A4 ,,,, 'Lir ... \ , N /Po__ .4), '1 //0:), .--------1416 ...itif._ ke4 i- iii-----,.. \\P.\ ...... -:-,-,"-\\ ‘-_-:.\ 4 , .`..\- 6\ \ \ _- (IL., __,-,. ,•_,__I----------A.a----------------.._i_e'-',.' 1 '`\\\\**--4.'-- - , '-r:.- \ -::'-k.----`\..,-)0„-- \' 0 .1 1, ,.,„,-- 0 \ \r. \------- 2‘..--;-.-. .4.ita'‘,,s'‘, „.)-,_ .9\,11:tw /' • _,. ----, ,, _.,....,4 --,,---_-_p ,.., ...,i-\-i- -,' --c.--ij ---.,.\ „...., • w,..._ \, •-.•\ \-\\ \ �\ \ /-k i 1, ' /1 b0,- �r� 1, zdy\ ''..\\•'''. ''-(.`-'-•---) �,\ �r� �rJ n�, dwc,l• r`i. N�' \ 1 ' cA �, 'fir, a. /".-.- \:.0,,'..,, r \ _a \ _- _ / \�� 1 l 1 t1 , _1,2.4-, _ a 40 _ ar\'\ .:'v r. 'Y� --0-- \- jell —J'— lu til\:: t���i �;-= ',,, -__\ - s04 ` `,�\*INV-, 0 -7). ,c. '' - `•'\, -�`� 1 ��---I- jfl 11 \ �, 1 , L�-�= — - 11 t 1 11 V �' 'A' !\-/.. I ,/L` / /� /, \1 �-- , / .111 I i 1;5 V,,' , Aft ' ! \ ` ` `�;%'1, ,/'li iter\-\.>,, ..,.,, 1I-_� ..'/.1itIi ,,1 � = L� ..�: �'yJ � /'� ;.°'` �. 1 ‘ ./11a'I `!'""”) ,. � !rte e y� � ,..4.. : IIlI 111'��,1, �. 147.%. tri I �, /j / \ r.-,-- "°,`,`+ �',�y�,/. 1 1 1 5 ii,t �:. L' b ,0 ///��/� `i/ qia, ‘,/....- .-iii t _---- . \' I 1 1 F �I�!��,0 '. „ 4r*;.��. G+1111 �� i /rat'' `''i?ii, C'l /---V / �' l�/t /Ii � iii � r "'� ° . • �- �. ��i� , x.:�1__ , ,. �,we !� l; 14,(� °14 (-,,rip7 ,,, ...,,,,,, ..ct.moo, o ,.��1 O1l 1 / ' 141/. 0 Cti 11, I I /Oft / gal —a_` _ �/,�� Sl 5 ,-3r //, II br �// 1!I , I 1100/1--1 \\Ids ;� ��'\\\ �w / ' ,_, �� 9 O FA 1111 I I 1 441t1/1 1 A I11 ! I N ���►rr \ v /� _ r - j';. ,L _ Is, Iii A '1,, I, �,Jii ill -- i \�\ �D' _ i?..*„..---",-.-i �\``/ , I✓"` �,r--ti= -±' 1 . 1'^1�f r I�!F,�;rF \ $!.� i ter,,- :.. _ , ,;_,,,,,,4 , \ r% - R -;.1 1 !:-$ 1 --_,,A,,, I I��;j,.�!II�! 1 - /i -Nil- 1114 ('1 insi �--� ane �� �� ~� 6 8 !4 ,.. . — , ,,A ilk'. 1 3 1 1 ' /p , / ' ,oi.;11t!" ,.. 04.4._ - * , ,.,. . 1.1-, Ar a ,-.wri - , , . ,,ii i/ ii ottc; ,,,, .9.)err 0 ... * * i.ie , v. , LLI_pii .a..._ .--_,A, / , . i u... e-4L /P Y iii /-i4o\ mg) ((-i- \-- • * Ito i.itaccy.f==-_,I, - 43-0:0,0,- , i ,„ ,, ,,, ,./4,, .41 t,,o, // ,r / I • i, . �I C - , I I/ r r i( ) l •fv,l 1 \ ,2" j..:41r:'-..m�0 C= I 15 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: April 7, 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Valerie Feuer, Senior Planner SUBJECT: OV12-98-12 CANADA CROSSROADS DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A PROPOSED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONALLY ZONED C-N (PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTH OF LAMBERT LANE ON THE WEST SIDE OF LA CANADA DRIVE) BACKGROUND: Canada Crossroads received a conditional rezoning from R1-144 to C-N (Neighborhood Commercial) in March of 1997. The subject property is 10+ acres in size. The proposed use for the property is a commercial development of a neighborhood scale, which is consistent with the Town's adopted General Plan Land Use map and existing commercial development at the northeast and northwest corners of this quadrant (Smith's and Walgreens). The southeast corner of this intersection, which lies vacant at this time, could also potentially be developed as a commercial site, per current zoning. To the south and west are existing single family residences (Rancho Feliz No. 5) zoned R1-36. A grading waiver was denied by DRB and appealed to the Town Council. The grading waiver, as well as a 1evelopment agreement, has now been approved. A development plan was reviewed and recommended for approval by DRB in August 1998. The plan was withdrawn prior to consideration by Town Council after the development agreement was approved. SUMMARY: A height variance has been approved for the property, allowing building height to be 25 feet above natural grade. The Development Review Board approved a reduction in the required front yard, allowing the applicant to provide a portion of the yard and landscaping in the right-of-way. Under the rezoning case OV9-96-7, the applicant submitted a tentative development plan (TDP), as required by code. The development plan submitted does substantially conform to the TDP. Four commercial buildings have been shown, totaling 38, 150 square feet. The building sizes have been reduced from 45, 200 in response to grading concerns, by eliminating portions of the two shop buildings at the northwest and southwest corners of the site. The parking lots in these areas have also been revised, although the amount of parking is substantially the same as before. In addition to the building area changes noted above, changes have been made in the drainage and entrances. The overall drainage concept was revised to include three separate parking lot detention basins, which will totally remove any developed drainage flow onto La Canada Drive. In addition, the developed flow onto lot 553 south of the project has been reduced from that shown on the previous submittal. The northern and southern entrances have been increased in width to 36 feet for three lanes (one in and one out). Right turn in inly from Lambert Lane will be allowed until the proposed roadway improvements are completed. The public art requirement will be met with ceramic tile, mosaic-work, and/or relief in the screen wall on the property. The artwork will be submitted for Town Council approval at a later date. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 2 A meeting was held on March 23, 1999 to review the proposed development plan changes with affected neighbors. Some minor changes were requested and are incorporated in the attached plan. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD ACTION: The development plan now under review is considered a minor revision of the plan recommended for approval by the Development Review Board by a vote of 7 to 0 at the August 12, 1998 meeting. GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE: The Canada Crossroads project is in compliance with the Town's General Plan Land Use Map, which shows neighborhood commercial development on this parcel. Further, the project complies with the General Plan policy 3.1E, "attract new retail and service businesses, especially those in under-represented categories, in order to help reduce expenditure leakage." RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval of the Canada Crossroads Development Plan, subject to the conditions in Exhibit"A", finding that it conforms to rezoning conditions and OVZCR. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to approve OV12-98-12 Canada Crossroads Development Plan, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit"A" attached herewith. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Exhibit"A" 2. Letter from OPW&Associates, March 9, 1999 3. Reduced copy of development plan n I 3,1_,Liz,„4 N r.,-,6.,, Planning ng and Zoning Adminmstra or I I NO ' i OC ki.L.-_, 4./ Co unityiog •• ent ii irecto, / , Ai , f I own Manag; EXHIBIT "A" TOWN COUNCIL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CANADA CROSSROADS DEVELOPMENT PLAN OV 12-98-12 Architecture shall be compatible in theme and color palette with other existing structures at the intersection, as required by the rezoning. 2. All permanent signs shall be of consistent color, size and style and are encouraged to be consistent with the sign theme at other corners of the intersection. 3. The public art must be submitted to the Arts Advisory Board Subcommittee and Town Council simultaneously with submittal of architecture to DRB. 4. Development plans will be required for individual buildings if there is any change to the building footprint, parking, or circulation. 5. Any lighting in the south parking area shall be low level and directed away from residences. Lighting must be shown on the development plan and can be administratively reviewed and approved. OPW&ASSAY2IATES, INC. Engineering, Surveying&Planning 6383 East Grant Road Tucson, Arizona 85715 Phone: (520) 296-8544 FAX(520) 296-2356 .'.•••.'.ti1 .hY:M':.•:••r• '•',W.'.•h••WrY:.•:.Y:.'.•.•.Y:r.•r::.•r.•:.•.•.tiY.v.};..,.•.•..Y..�•�:Y••Y.ti✓r.•,V�.Y,.!t.�Y.Y.1ti r.'r•..Y•M•N.}}Yr.}}.'.•.ti vr:r.•.ti•.:r.•.v.• r:.•.•.w •.vr.••.vr.•. •.vr:.'.Y:x.Y.v: :{r,.v,. .}..;};. .r.vr.. }• March 9, 1999 Ms. Valerie Feur Town of Oro Valley 11000 N. La Canada Oro Valley, AZ 85737 Re: Canada Crossroads Development Plan OPW Project No. 93072-104 Dear Ms. Fuer: Per our telephone conversation, attached are three full sized prints of the revised Development Plan, along with twelve reduced prints and two copies of the revised drainage report. The primary changes made to the plan are described below: 1. In response to grading concerns, we have reduced the overall building area of the project from 45,200 square feet to 38,150 square feet by eliminating portions of Buildings 3 and 4 at the northwest and southwest corners of the site. This adjustment in the layout will allow the site to be developed without any further grading waivers being necessary. The parking lots in these areas have been revised accordingly. 2. In response to the Mayor's concern of concentrated storm runoff on La Canada Drive, we have revised the overall drainage concept to include three separate parking lot detention basins which will totally remove any developed drainage flow onto La Canada Drive. In addition, the developed flow onto lot 553 south of the project has been reduced from that shown on the previous submittal. The separation of the detention areas required the relocation of Building 2 further to the south. The overall parking lot has been adjusted accordingly. 3. The northern and southern entrances have been increased in width to 36' for three lanes (one in and two out). Ms. Valerie Feur Town of Oro Valley March 9, 1999 Page 2 4. Note #18 has been removed and Note #19 has been revised to allow a right in only turning movement off of Lambert Lane until the proposed roadway improvements are completed. 5. The unnatural slopes which exist at the northwest and southeast corners of the site will be cut back as allowed by the approved grading waiver. Please review this submittal and respond to us with any comments. We strongly feel the changes which have been made create a much more acceptable project to the neighborhood and Oro Valley. Because no significant revisions to the site layout are involved, we ask for a timely approval by the Town staff so that the revised Development Plan can be scheduled for the April 7, 1999 Mayor and Council meeting. Do not hesitate to contact us with any questions. Sincerely, OPW & Associates, Inc. -------(-1 t()J1 Tim Walsh, P.E. TW/lb Enclosure 93072\vf0309.1tr cc: Bill Martin Doug Martin 0 i y 0 i g 0 r p NN N N -` m --, D-v` ')rn' i-.11 -' ON bNg :-.NN O m= D 0DD' OZ - f. pp�O �Dg �zCQ-1 ycD, mv00 tV pO> c='' p(r t?-128X O�nX �"P�l mN m 2 N `.•2Oi ?- p � O”m ST7 rnnv '-'1:'' WI m � I 0.88 m op n_p DD ng ,� >hyNZW S mQr0N j T bV1(-1 mmNe 6g� ��D 0-(-. rTmt) IP OD = dD q V m- Fmiv" 5e' mm 1 vm nO� ri Sccl mroo � NOD^!OP Z N m m 165E r-N PI rO- 0Z G� � 1m!zpZ Uqg a- SpnA qPn-54 zDrOiD rNRzg ZD L11 Ow zDrnZFl— OG)O gO UIDNTrSt _2OD D;-rn4.ru DOp4 wOC C00 ZCr) .,,,t1p�m NOr �r*1 e r� - rn SZD0-n [,,,,-.9A -±-§ rn0A i O ' Driw� DrnO1 \�_ P �W j�SD ApD� r � nS1TAO C-p -2I 4 ZOa ( '-:". 79:2' n00 ( m7 '^ZZ PA! g; OZ "1 q rn Pe nOP s0m ODZ O - O !LW yyN� OO! (7,,n�n rD = c4r,(rn� 482 ni ON; rnO !mm h ,U4 r-�.4 Pi: OIT -m07O A m -cD- � - IN!! pPt OZ dPq s4 1;h r mOm - z)p N r a iY Arn or 7�0Sioz Z � zmC 3K)-0- m m� 5,9 !gE°<; C fl ,, � Z tzD :mini, 0 -Vl'NQRZr MZ � 4 r %, ZOb �gi imp ''31 mzl P O ._O0r96iIn 2 -OPw D1 p mi-,i7aC 0p0 d��ii O ( Y 8 2 P- M � ' fO*O4 F.;-r"' Z mg O mo 'Om W'' S � -/NNZ D2n` Om: IO C7O Om �'D,,m nOOVT D 2 aZ ZU � '' 'OO1° On Dr0 z N QZgr2 E44 lqprq • Ic)D ?v1O1lp O 2. Dp - ngcboDv4 ' opp - g0*r1 zp ocF tmm n7rnr zn4 � � Or cn D1� p 1pa < 9 ^ z N D p, S D Pr 4 RP yWWV2Dito :3,75 n (n rn§ Df NOWcV 2D O Z p O Dmrnir , x-0 p ppn O Z 55 XM6 20rr-1,. Z P � mD pDW„M. W >- (n rnE Omp 7m Z q 03 O "WA Arlig '< 2 . Nm g r; Zm OpNA O ' OP L� 90Ei4C0 El rnON 4ON t sO rnm5 1" I z ,-3,a' cD N TI o9 ZO -1z (n0 mz W131. A p rn = 0 ,N ffri D0i m% ()-8()-8-(5 - = C) = 'gqDm t S n . m 6 m�^ � r � � DOOD� -p n p m<_ (U) 2 � n cn ' v' W � 4 6 0 > 3;, D O 4a _ c� o® a g o D D D rCi c= (� .eco x r X M Z1 i'.4, <m fN*i x O O N w. V1N tn” c //O��\ Dr + r r bll 99 -I D" D� n� n nl r II H < > (nn O O O m �� �� V mZA 11 D D D v 515 O O cn cF\ ; n0-� ?? �i�*imm r i rn rmn 0 V_/ z r-,E; ', �� Z � � �/ �•c� ' 9-if.i m n �cD7c�'icD> 6 Z or 0 c p _ _ V S Ctt tD i';',",' A+ < r Z, O 'D n n N O N b\ cn\ O\ ONi\ to ii "1 pmap 11 0 FA fig' j A 0 8 w 8 w'8 i 5) X10 s C_ NN C � �O DO p0 'UO O�1 ,+ piI'D otOo �z ''^^ p —GIG' �rn ncn ncn Pi P c In W {p to o O pp :?..,Y (mlf �'� �') rn r C rr r C H IIHIIHn 0c K al m 000 ;`N, o " "2 V. r n n r - -i M 0 O N N o O `' - (n V1 fn [n ,i3 . . r W , CD7 CD7n n 8r> n n ^> O O mmm m 8 m8 N . z W -1w -0 11 I ;x 0 11= `� r © ® O W -� to invC) n P r 0 �+cwm Q xY. -I �l \ fil o o 8 o o Z z N NnD� >: III- ....3 \ _< r O v v v Do 10 Z m 2 �, x -I ,{ N rnD o m N_ . Zm t .>� III- ti � z '' NNF:. D � mDJDv1m T x \ 0 07 I W I vZONmZ\ a� ,x>\ I /� � \ n C7 0,7 n n � Faf,O �' .�>: III; h, z -i (in D iT1 (n n to 1 , D ,O�m Z rZrt X m Z go, D D DCOD . W N-FN ro n� r Z �- co Dr O -ni rn DD Z �A aJ D �n r W 09 m $ o D D� zZ I o �, r c 0 rn Z < oz m p rn n D rn �1 D xi m -I < O fDn Vri 9. —1 I � �N "' D D !Zm a = = Z O O O O O N n VOA'O :V Z .ZI ID n ou OO Z~ (,,,,,1 v m7O�.!-f'-Ota\'��� � z? (ilai� N ill O D ! ja) �� 0 ��� vii o Zl Rl 13 E © �' III '�'' x I ; 1 m la L >Z i�P •VIZ!� ®�� I rn b �, rn H , 0 o o _ �(r'r77 �r1 N O ZOAm �Zpj O O N m W 2 9 a> '�0 X Z X 8 X X _X N r W9 O "'I D 8 D X p •n[ m O 2 D z Z O g !n cn of r G7 I O acs Dn o zcwir 9 9 0 0 v i = 2 ` n ^m z r t ►'� o T z c) 1> m c7 n rn m S m z g z N z z z g o .-_,..I.,°..: m N O 4- (n D D ry T p m � � 2 rn -Dp W p D 0 G7 � G7 � c) G) G7 p < � to�G7 �*1 7,,•...?., V N D (n D p r3�37 m Z fn C')5 R'_` �� r c.n D OA Z D ' � D t'.' rte- 'OD � � D A � 0 � m � �D.Z�IO � z a� A D ^ -0 S mm O rr i R p p mp D m Z m r ? 1 m§ � -,-,,,s4 ,s��Z � Cr H W 0 Z " _I S D7 r p C 4 "0 z rn z rn Z p _ { v c" (n"'Nar�rr �� !'' z ! 2 >z=1 Z z z m O E rn m ;N'� rci Pm 2 ,gi a ri a O Z O _ $ r Z O cn r' T - �.,ADO i � �e�e$ v' Z � n rnDO- � s�ANu c__ O ZjzO fm�Co 9� P J e 4 O9)1 I � �!N o `O 1 1 I , 1 lid I RANCHO FEUZ I 1 I BOOK 31.PAGE 92 EXISTING•ZONING R-36 2` --,\\ ,,, -7--;-___—_-L.-,21/1/fi 'C----?- 1--v-s-- ii...-- f, I 1 Ii(i.---- \\''N; ' //7(,----. ' 1 (?'---- ' 1 x`'''j A . ' '-in:r" t 1 \- (, , , „„ ., .„ . , ,,,.,,. , iii '7-01,•4", X:`, iip 77-7---./________„,,,_____, ' t'r----- , :,., _1,1_2 _..:,_ I \ tin \ %\ I / 0 2 ,\\ .\\ ielisisl 1 i I/ i/N_- 7 ae" -,-,.,. .. -----_,..,\----.\\7\: :- , c_. ,,, ,,, 40.1(), .. \ \ \\ \\8 g .il 1 ill ' 1/,- --- - ':;,, ‘1 1 ,-_—___=," ___________. . —\\-- ''''t''''llrail ‘,„_,..... ,,, .//,,,,v>--A- � ' �. �� t, '/1' /-'�� N � i (/ �� -------_-----/ s •� --- - --\\ , \...,. .... -..,.s.,,_,,,,,),m _,.....• ... 1 • 7,_-_:7- \ -.... ..44. ,,,......._47-- ---„, ...,.... . ,iik \ N\ \„ ___.,,,] , , IN ,,/,,(----\\ ..1„... --,---...._...,:t7/ ------) -,.------ -----.-±„..----2:--- ---N4.--,<:: ,„„. 6.. . - ----i, -.....„ - .....--v„-,.......„--„„,, ., v , ,,i ,,, , ,....„:.....,,.. . „ \ , _ ,, .....„ . i\\ ...__-4.....—,.__... -: _ 7,,,,_. ,,,.,,,.,,,_, J_. —7.=.--. . A,. . ....._-...,_-7 , , „......--„,,„(_ , x. -44"-w------;---,)-r " r.-:---Th cam\ .i, ., ;„, ,!„ ......, �- _,; , \ N�________, \`---- 1„.ft 11-0-I f\I ',,,\ 1 ' Iii — ``,,,, �� ` % --'� _, ......... ...,,,...-------- .-.ft 1°• 1 /....,.,,„ , , 1 " fig' rip.--- - ',,K__-------_-_--------- :-: 1 i.-,. —== �; k -�, 11+ ___________________\ x _-�-�...-- I II toi(v '_ 't�« ' , \II �' .:),H x`N° /�/ fin,�� , �a �� n. ��� -.- ------------: ::-_-----\---, �-C\\t\\ \'*"...... ".'"'" �. - ,II II ;\ CA .. -11,,,-4t, '' 1 ''''- 111 ..' gl'il • \I .. -) , `,-,'N-- \ /Vk :j:"‘Sis ..;.-f. ----- i'ss' \ '-'''''\--- \ / �`\----:--------------------- it e5., '�1,1filf v41,4 1 1 ( \\ ---, \ .,.., ot.--4 fes- .p' tvi . \ ` .1::',.",± -------- %,alkt,1,, ,, J .14 ri:,y 11 ._1' \Vit.i r4.. ; 1 17, ____.--,---_-,____--Th +M .."\ 1.;___„,-J ita , LA � NA c7. I*1• 171' r ?�. /�. moi• f;t� • ---7 --)''- 7* - /r *47. X11 !�-� ��`..-.;-__ - „.-,. 1 - o ♦ rn?,.;�. a t ..... ,.,.._,,, --.. ............;. ....-..''''..'.•....‘,.:1., 1.4 ' . k.\\ \,..\.:..„ E.4! PtiW/OrtiOri i —"I"' ,1 irk rft.. 42 I /..-----" imit ................ .. ..„2„......______ _,,,,,.. .....-... ......,,,A,7,,;4- ,,... ‘,...-,-,;---\\ '',44/), 410, ,,\\ -- - il PT" r. ' I/ 0000,",-i.' ..:7-77.7:1. ..z,i., , . \ 1 ,,,fli' Otto. \\ ooh ��� � .:; � r w§ 8 � ��N Fir, g� - � �l�� f �`�����t1 g + I�''.. 'W. •p `. S. ,�•J•$ r errS �W.. �� '. a ll ♦ I�� s'�'� C} , . .UOL i..r ,-r, Q= ,-,.-i,.,..::::-.:.., ,i5 IMF' 1l Ix_W o .� � ° ®e, c,. t qi m i." . i�_�'I::, I( , ,00 \v UUII '''' ..1.'',...'"r:r1.::-.': •...'.: .tAtt \ ‘mtir;A A �t.t�► It �,` \ S� ,iii 11� '-9r,Ci�J�*��� �L� r,--._. t --.112111111111 '.'`.����1. �'l•. ,. - ., q �'� �1::�f� •.�w I NAI \7 1,z40_,\,' ,:fe ' ` CAIV . ,� r - } Y �(,,•' w7!`y -� 7�3 •• �L�li;�...,, ...,...:;:..sit.::.,....:.,„,„,..t......:.,:i...:. -=G. 6f � �� �� r�? •�-y_ ,fir •.S/t�=' .'71:x.-. ..,,i•• VIS •' •� !. : 4 .moo J N 6 O N ` O 111' 1S N C .1: � r^. 2 1u=.,- If Ali 1�'�ruu'- r 1-14 N R to _ p�=fU=-JL-�'I1 , 8 1(1:. �k. gIC=1L=11-1, WE = Z D IF o %-LJp m ,IC�frI - riii,e, n 0 v M w 11=11=14= .JI Jl 11NI (. ri k:� r� =Jl.�lllll11 fn o �Lll1L1--�u' Q v 1-1If�L L�A v o m cn �: 2 I 1111'�c O m -1 c grx 7ccii .11=1 p F N 31,$ <1 ''g _ L I� 1_4.11 -134-0 co of o :U X,-Aililr. C AO 1111�L W, �� I i , !ir D z O il 111 PHASE UNE �� to If Oho 'F-.) ���1 �z_n L rl u l;.' r i CEm dli. L9 II1?5 •ZEtD HAS!! 0 p U a V cn f l:�:ll�1 2 o ISI .� m n$ IL-11= a t- - r",,,-33 tas w C7 1 I a Ii�JI o 0 rn 1. 0 t1=[ rA 2 'p: ��Z Ale fA vmi 71 c! a ;4;2 v -1Tai t f m � a L , ttiro ,. RL:-----,,,i , / y i D Ini•L± 6 ,ii Iii. 8 , 1.7 grki jtn°:uit���I=a=o `: -�z it��lTl' ZD z 701.1 it -§ =1' <5 V .z N zA z ;�D�1' I pZL_. --w 9.m D�1=� \ ' -lip.P r.� nIf�=r� O L t O o 1 X �'1 X II n' 1,. 812 f m� cD7 pi \i wz �O.- iN�V ��Q • cnCwm S o� 1 o,.gyp rAi` o, pi zo c,a2m2 Z Iry il�.�l�. o N • zm ... _II:.' ro o �Dm N z CD -� i ' � fn rn m r = wz�tn 0 1 z p nD,m z <� o + m m m p r 53 D ?Em Ill�� C P I 1111�Lf1�� I to r=IL-1cil 1L=IZ--i1=1poo ILI�JIjr,moo 11=1i� `'II Pt,nor=�T j- 'o y. _a.o+•.. =iilli m , rL 'I 114�t�1' � rf: 111fIL�LI =LI I � II.�Ltl.l N _ lig p lk.. , J o® `4- D n I.I. : "AO ' bi �' w:D 0 r u= v _� Pi mo M a lira. W �J yea � voo�l< o �o FM' � :I p L ' , ;-,Az v � � Z 1=1 O�� D ria � '� ♦' ,>, COO t 1�� 2 AZ n m D O h D x I. Z r 1 m L O'-, •O PAZ fir: �ZJ m A 8 IP'SI 9, m D Ili, ^� Z �o p 'LA N ;p (n '-n- (mj 1 t', D D �7:,. r-.Zl 1+' NOO 0) Fi (41'N i 1ii -C 7C got.�Tjif� � �7 1 n cr mZ © �' �< cOnZ 7 1-ii Z� I:�i Z �i 0! N n m P Oitoro Ov(mf m nz 9 C-i F C P' # D ra m 0 0• °ac a= � O �� m• v "?.. i y N 16 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: April 7, 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Valerie Feuer, Senior Planner SUBJECT: OV12-98-12 CANADA CROSSROADS LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR A PROPOSED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONALLY ZONED C-N (PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTH OF LAMBERT LANE ON THE WEST SIDE OF LA CANADA DRIVE) BACKGROUND: Canada Crossroads received a conditional rezoning from R1-144 to C-N (Neighborhood Commercial) in March of 1997. The subject property, 10+ acres in size, is located at the southwest corner of Lambert Lane and La Canada Drive. The proposed use for the property is a commercial development of a neighborhood scale. SUMMARY: Front yard requirements on both La Canada Drive and Lambert Lane are 30 feet. The approved front yard .duction allowed 20 feet on site and 10 feet in the right-of-way, fully landscaped. The required berm and wall, along with the landscape buffer, have also been provided on both street frontages. Buffer yard A has been provided along both La Canada Drive and Lambert Lane, as required by code. A meandering sidewalk begins at the Lambert Lane access, going around the corner and the length of the La Canada side of the property. A recorded twenty foot protected natural area already exists along the south and west sides of the property, buffering the residential properties. A forty foot natural Buffer yard D is shown on the west side of the property. On the south side, Buffer yard D is shown as natural and forty feet wide along the western undeveloped edge on the western undisturbed portion of the site. The Buffer yard D then becomes 25 feet wide, with a screen wall along the south side of phase 1 only. The western half of the site will remain natural. The slope west of the shops will be vegetated with trees and hydroseed. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD ACTION: The landscape plan now under review is considered a minor revision of the plan recommended for approval by the Development Review Board by a vote of 7 to 0 at the August 12, 1998 meeting. GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE: Staff has evaluated the Canada Crossroads landscape plan against the General Plan Policies and finds the development in conformance with Policy 9.1H, with landscape improvements that mitigate negative visual impacts f buildings and parking lots. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 2 'RECOMMENDATIONS: 'Staff recommends approval of the Canada Crossroads Landscape Plan, subject to the conditions in Exhibit "A", finding that it conforms to rezoning conditions and OVZCR. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to approve OV 12-98-12, the Canada Crossroads Landscape Plan, as recommended. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Reduced copy of landscape plan F:\ov\ov12\1998\12-98-12\LPTC.RPT ¢ r - -4)114 N 0.- C,,,,C (1/ ' a 1 ng and Zoning Admini rator 1 , / i ' it //I' ity I- e' •pment t►ire/a° 410Town Mana:-r ,w7,-.; ,• \\-\,-,,,,,,,,T,,,,( -_:,,,,„--___ _______„).„, 1,„,,,, , CO 1/7, --„' \ :,,,,,,„,,,..g--___--,_.,:„.,,,"______,;,--,./.:-__gt,. \-5----,, ,---- s, \\‘\ \0\ ,..._:.-, -_ \‘,.______:-)t1),....,----,...,:s: !3 =I. . ........,\_„,,, ,,,/(,,,,,..„..____ __ ,._ /.,__:,,,,,,,, A,,,,s-,\I.:\ ‘ 2) ,‘ , ......----k...... 7,--.::...,„..._. -:2,‘,,, „-.----- ,v, ,ill,i fill(--- --if _J V________,X7--. I!! ,,\\,...______c v\\\3::::-_—_i "\-',...../ ,,`-:...,-,\\ _\ ; II p -1 5c4i -ru \\/\, , ----'---0`, *_ 7 1/, -tib -� - \, , '* I , t(d r \ --'---,--------- 4,,, 7,.-q,-;-1:_i_-._'.-mr.- .. , ----------______-___------ ----.\ ,___'-' _i---4, ,.. -.'-----,..,.'...---71' g:F,-, 5„,<z,,,, (\\-, --.__.) „ -..-__,_-_,/ iit,____LEP---17......_„\------------- .'\4.,:-......,..,,,.....,;....—....... .." ....,....„_ ......,,,,,,. ,:i ii ..... •\". 1 i E.r, o .co ------ _ - • . ( L______-----„__ -_,,,, \\, \ ____________,----___ ___:N- -N___. A -._.. -Ty.,._-,_._.;17.)._ it D-Q � 4--;;---jrp",-- , ' - m211 `> J , ,% ( -��__._ - . �\ ,� I "mac. r,..-.27.• , ....„, \,\s\\\:...::\s.,:.::,..::.. ------.____-_-----. ', ....‘... ....t., _ i\c„\-,, ,,,, r ,_ ,_----,----,, #,,,,,... 2/4({.A,,,,,., •,,,,11,1 I I if 1 '---------______:_7_7"::\\ N_____ -------... 4,\.\\,\,,, c it," ,- {' t.ii,. D v 1� 111� ,,, , �-.r-� -.,,.`. ▪/ �\,\\..-� ''-�� --, ,`\ ��\ \\ .x_\�• --,„,•_.----:-_______,„......_ :::,7 . ,,a■E _,-__,, .,---- _ _____„,..,_,________, .,\,,,,. ,,,,,,,,„_. „, ,, , ,,,, -----;-- -,-,-,_-_------:--,-----z-------- \\,,-------,-- ,\----- ,‘.\\,\—,---(( A...„,_—___—_,-_-_------------ \ -1------,N-----,____, ,.\ 11111 CI ____---..,---=___-/- -� r7. F �� t I` -- 4I -----) cID t :-...:: :•') ....••1•- ... "..... Ailltypit_ -_.:,....-,---,...,..._ ----,,,-..._ , ,,,, , i ,,, qk 'CIO: r 1.:-. r.. f , .I wo �.,7t..\ ` / P. • �'��/:11_.11°: j ��'1i..�� �i�I�r)/��i�.���i,y-.— ��.� !�"v�, C �.��,��� ,���.��.,.,Z�•����T�*3 •`� � � \ `• ,\,Ate" �IIr' ' �•'1 ��f i��+:�`-.���_.._ � �w�w=�.��y`~�`,�C's%�'���,+? �i{\``� / 1��---�'•111`‘`i?).i''' ,..'AS .,� �/"---- - `.� -----,,, '\ - ��,,ii I�NM��l�IIII'�� / \�� i. 12 �; �� � cn pE J ---4,1467:11"",494'17,/, �►��ti.;.• !' i �� •\ �� \,.All ' �'`I! v � �,._. ,,,,,,,or til g o _ ;00 _ _ u`nu a1���t`1 r J „' \ ' i 1 , i :-;,),, ..pip).,--..,1 U -2,1ft -I' . I 1 (..„.....mim--- .....„.-- --4108,431/ . ° ksitlIvilt;=. -41) 1 , , g�, �g _ems:�� ;� co t 4.11 .4_120,101%.0 \ ` o,",As � • �F ii '+ 1 11 S � ' y it {�`'� ii2 1 ' (ik)1\1 \ II---iv_,ii 1 . f:\_, i" --� rid. \ ��. v :� i p §al ,i1 a -('. _\\\ \ I,1. 0 ‘ , -_—_____:1,,-,.-7 5 81. 1 v _•-^--�\ \,:��au. .,, ki r L , 0 ` , �Ir�� of /_s `_-1. _ I(, re -;-21- ) 1.n,-' 'Llj i') - '----, . :11 , '' " 111,,,k,,N,i,:;:\,_ r 7 , ,,- lei,i ;,,\ . ro � � �.�.\�aQ ,�1►ll /�!� /'•=>�b •?i �� vv..�. a��L ��� ,��.i;, 1!1_Iii-4 lit ?_ D / __ ,N.,3 ►V\\. ,�� !. f14 i ., Ill int, ...I.71 i ( .� � !,� st4,.-!:g .:,-A411-i.,..1§1 .,_ �l� �" 1 __ � _ `:' � 1`; •.�!_�' � 1aR D 1 : ���� -�l'���. �_ ..'\ - .. -����.�.��I. O ' i�I1� ■� ii,a�1 % - ,�'4a, ��>V'�+�f!'�7"���.�/ i7,1��I�*1�.���/`T�''.��:ZC��%`�� �,,i►�i� '�'��~e�� ``� ------/- tilt `--••/ I ° m [ ��.'L:r.•''`'r; La `�`!�ili iiia lI -% ��`. eg _yl7-�i-1���.72.14=.11 .: � '�� 1 I►� � � -,-----,----(-77----5,77---7 �, �, �� ,,, , _ -- __! (, : ;w ml \ `_, 1;�N pow'YAMIA, 11.„-_._. -_._..__________\.41 , . \ \ 4-.A-6i i&,.w i,—ir gr ff p, _— 1 — r 411 --'"-- C,,, ,---J -u U 2 - ' --) -<; ----''-----:--- _'`‘`-- ,---- '--\ la ig _____-_,<7:- (,7-....,1.7 (\•-_____ _ --c------ ,---,.. t."a 1 ; 1 VIS 2 //' ' "*"1-1-l' L---.4, , • 4- ..4J,rt • 8 3, 33 D s; a r D q m t R e ® CDJ._ °• ��_�� � �rn'�• �< 3�j�S, - JI- - 9. O gD.-L "-1 o':,E Qa$ CTt D o 3 ,O °_v ,1- .a-•v •a co e o ° w H ° D D N N Zvi ;w (n ), a fp, ;3 cA C7 0� o`D °� oc°o Fit._nen ° oo �,e °j nc oo N° 3 o� og � 03 N= m< ,�;C7 .. ]-.3 3 ,O Fl N 7 N 3 7 3 N O O O� n.0 ,?. <= 4. D° 21 i n D �, o � D o� o. S a ..n -. v,�o c� v_ v p� �� o 08.111, 3 °3 a.o -f,o °,°. °... o T m o m, c.° c c $�-p Q 0 3 °m r s� ° ''o 41 ° ,o o,o p , °. o 08 1 T n o 0 0 o 4 D a io c 4 D�(Tl —o. X °� v, i,� o °7; m° on a os o, o o° ° o m N �Dc �• o ° �D co�� � � ��.to 0 0°N- o � a�.� -0,-f9. n°n � 3 rn o Zr+frTl aa+01 _ ,,n v am O o N m3' a o �oIE G, �'�1� oafl��fliio� °'Wm�' N- a o c � Pi S r) e o W m g'\D ° cpm Z al O 1�. n▪ T ,n a q5-(;),, to Cn LP . cn v,Olen . cn cn CA LA Cr. Ln cn NAS n�,Vr �y E �, i,�. Cn (e,2, o fl i ac 74 ,7 O g 2 -2 2-,n O L7 R E G) 2 R G) o Q 1 Inn N `' , Nm fTl o 0 0 0 0 0°, 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° o 0 . a � . '. 0 m m ° a _° m� o a co. °\ o\ son aoa ° rn x' ° 0 0 0 0 o m O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .o o° o0 00 - o � v� � > > > > 3 0 3\ > > > > > 3 > > x a xa xn xn n _ x '9,F), 4 D 7 en 7 N W N tJr N A en W (n N -' Oo - N A -' W p N--N--N N----N N °N - .c-7' A b�jb000ulobbobbb n �N(Tl to N O (r _, A W W Ol W A V ,D N c++ V P. V Cn O � Z O mm %U A en `^ n �.N enf N r O C u N rr 0 o 2 'z er'VrigIM �m _ in tZ ��+'+ z 1iolt�BDJI}1c�,igflc� u _,,— o •O�C Ii1 ®n Z®I®O m n Q' D 1§114VCIr --M6glica40;ligii 0 r° u,11111-u-sili 'U,Wings g- 41$TioRii qVI g''�a O fA Z EnggN ....... g-°,gn'! o°cr iba0 it I o 4 ' 1Nn id ffi�OI N4444. -1-Q8.01p .gippo 9.11 a. p1.1cl� ilW W� .i _ -_J CO< 'UQO I -1r- III O�0 b b �'wam�ultia��p�I ii z f-i �� qS- i k a§vt Aill il' s (r; In z r v., vi N Z �1,-1 $(D dog ��o $-���i a i, 0- 3 Dn4' v)o (� • (7 e�� :.,.3 -D(1.,,,_. &'‘,3,,,. . g� � V 1""glig :1 U i V3$� SI R��-, s�, R ,,,5-_,_ LA ANADAS2oR. c ' 9 •D t ■ 0 n ° ZD 11 V Op CA 1F1N till i 1 FT;hg: 1.!., I,�nOi 0 Fil2>e •t- , Y A �N Nm g. i V1 p m_ln NDA 3400:000WW1 CANADA CROSSROADS DSF. TMHS ASSOCIATES,INC. A PORTION OF THE SECTION 15,T-12-S, ''z<+»,''?c� a (— gillMU o C.i,"; Landscape Architechre 196 W.%%npson St R-13-E,G+SRBM,TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ;�q,, ,���. Irrigation Design Tucson,AZ 657rn v. PIMA COUNTY,ARIZONA c� .:;�,,, Urban Design (520)882-9655 r [1] i Z ORO VALLEY,ARIZONA -- Envir tal Services ( ) 7 \E -`� ' - -- 2586-- _ 0 \ -_ `` \ \ - -- , � `_--. . ., \ - /� /Ill I � \ ,----,....-z::,--,:-,.:--,...--- \\p__,--, \\ 'Pit E E (\b.- A._„___ 4 `\ 10 ,La SW'4-EE EFEF E•\Fr,/-; H E\ E a -E' _EN E -*0 E t ` I f 1 I E E \ EFfE E E (E,c__*__,,. ' --EtEE\tE Ef�E\\E E ..._E� `\'\\ II y E , _E __E`- - E /FT t---4- E E\-F' E�_© 40 \ 1I i ______;_e________,„ ... ........4‘ , ,,ellk 4 . , \ 1\ ' `1 ,_, ' / ) , g'2 ik..:1_____ 4e. .,4,......„___,...„..„, „,,,,,_., , ____,_,,/, i lirci7 7,. .---wiw......144.........artaveivtift I -------.. von/ ....,......-,,, ,,,,....ftwo- ,‘,111 .4craik., ',-1=-111ir_....„,,, 4.41,, ...... ......„.._-_,\,,, a k ' ____..111111E 1,11 .4 ella...... - - ..,,r _,,,,,,.....„.. ,i, ....,,,,______,-,.„-, 1 -- vairware.6.-,..,,,ipA*r-...-past, - ... .iim,..., ,,-„ ,„,_ N.,,,- - :4.. \ ;5 i I ,,,----,-1_,:_____-____,_______,-------________,____._____:!"Priar--' "1-1-71.'‘Hs .....e."- .1:40.•,,,174 --"-----4.1,, -\ '4''' .111' 171-11- "1.1111)---) \. lir 1•i 1,-,......._ 1-----*-, --VimuM):'‘`, * -______ -1----'- +.... ,,...101i.. .- nettw---*------- '' "kilAitt ''\\Ye' i. 111111, `11 �,O i�• �-�4 - �~e--•--4..._E`�'_---F----t----t--(�E-�-El ---�F--�---F----E.__�'� �-'.:_-',�--`� _ 2'•�`\ ` ,',44...... Nit,� � '`` F\f, f*r./ iii.-''f'---E_..-E E `F-- .f__...-----.1---"-4„�."E- A -"_.-_.e! --2:`1--E•--? • � --- 1 / .__ 7 c__________,___________, .,„___,"-F--. E f E E• _-F.�_-_ 'P-_-(.._ ....*''''''' ,..--...1. 11r1.,_ ` �`, `� 1 �E-/ E�,E , I. ..._ ,, "'____ _____________________:____________==______________:------ ------,?_45----------- "\\-,`� ----q_....„„,„1,,1/4„ A���'"'it i . ,, 1`1 , ,,,/ + / _______ VT +-1'1:- "- RiegtiN;,-. .*Ite,`" .''''' 1\\ 7 �`_ _II254 - a • ,[rhh t 1E E iii a ___---_-_ ---___ -\'�ii:I _ ���-------.-._-----__ -------\\ � ,� 1.4le' li( rl: 1E, F' E \, ,\ \— 7(A 1 \ \ ���� Ng w.otrk4 Vf)1110 LI \..../ E f --- -_-_---. \ \ \ , i'01)rk•," 1 / ------, \ \ 1 - riiiitt olitiF 1., ._ f , , ,,,i.- i `7_-_,---_-_-, sm.,,./), \\ ____,,./. / Qat ¢]� /�\ \) ' ) -I 1! 1311 ~ / -,\ .\,,, -,„\. \\\.A) q •^ � � ` ` �lid i�.l (.,'!, -1 _,-;:g-_.___:/ji. le iiw 11 re - —_ , - ..„.„..., , pm -- i, , \ ,,_, , ,*:,7.4.,t:.,t,, 1 ,,, ..- ',/ . il fil li (-).-4 V IT NiVo vq1/4..,, ..., Ati:. 11111fAj'il \'\ kriVii,,,,k1k)4AWk i=-.-----;- ---i I. ---,(4 ii g , ._ _______ _.____ 7 _ --- _- \�, i--- Ali,. .7•`•V 4., — , - , , :c., la. .o ,> , ,. air,,i611i,ANW, `, It:i 4"i! 11 0 ,... 74420„*.,-yA - , ,.;,_-:_ , 0 c 4 ,,,) ,________ ciairee-\\N .i Ili a 1 • ) ----- lif--‹ / \ \ 0 ,....stilla,74,%\\.\\\\‘;tii\ ii \11\11"13 it \‘ 1' '\`‘ 1 II i',,,.1 ____ ii .Y, 1 11111 A-- --- hip b.), � 2 , :►o;.`r:o`N, \\17 )i ir..-3,'f.i„:! "--z. hi;„g ,.... ( :14, LA.Ak s iadi-6 -I—IL—) A _ ,---\\ \ rfa.....tat......,,,,,..6:,..1 N\ % ,../ ) >__) � P ii... Y\ • i! ( ------\ in) 1 . ,,, Pun' li‘\ 1--;" Va-IPA~ ..„_.,... @ i,,r 1 I i 1 /06 ; " itkkk\1 \ V\\ 5. ) or/ lijI i ,,,. , 3 g - i 1 a �:L \! I _...... _____ �I�f,,,P(i t. \ n 1 Pm. , 4 , .4a :1:' \ \ N, 7:fi), 1 0 I 41, i,-• /,,:m 14) i • ,,,,, ai,s,11_, I I \ \ 1\ , P-VNIM;rf, I 00 i i go .______ ,1 17,. (i )rt, , , , \,,, , \ cAgovii_,) 1 , ti,vo ),. 1 \ b0q ) irliov �m� }P4 z I N p ,,,,,14,,,, \ \ ‘‘. �� RI °•�i . ; I I \ 1 1 M 1 .PE. 0„,.., le , . i to 1131! t - a ' 1 8-2,< riP,,,,, ap—A_ PI MOS\ 1 .... e 0:11 a Amt. . Atfiibe. AA 4tofilei,,,k i f.((TT2tt Cn �./• •-.',�• ..EiTnaw-..----�-i �'o`��..,, (`�<:,t, .;-- ct.- 0.0,a` .. .i,•`_i ,.�s..a ,,, /!' ..,11dAt D.Z6 g m 2 I A.5,aPa�..'Y,'-... t - :.•yf2 \\'�" .�T►`eeit iA �Ri. l► mit*,- E . 'NA .� 1 / F4'wow i�?e,,,' \ �'��'�i/.� it = *6,�;,j 1 ~� : e �i ,z--- 1► ate : °7� I®:•'•;ti1;;�>4 / i m wY�'.� JI. � \��wl�f}���!' ����"_'i��►L. ':f:i�:�`/� ��� 1��'"�� -� !�' ° _n Y -..�`�aU v C�p'O; ��.>�:,�;j�>�l�`3`AA�►•�, �� � 1\ I'n "3'� c:A� 1R 1 .�•.n >•,i' �� v o.l11e - �*► A �'�✓� .:s' '��� ` •� 2 2 D -, �.1'1! - Q►l3" `!!,'O,S,O'P '>;`,1 --- X10 o, `ir. 6 i r �l�3s -. r:, 4:►z t.,& f IIITTTIII _,,,e.--,_i '��1>�a u.t•"o-1•�'> O, � ,a���•iII► � �y���� ,`i1 `O O^�. _ O'- ��.�_�,��v i ll - T... .."1"1"--.--'',,,,A > ...."'"">r'''' = � \�AZ��1`f�,� •,`/52511. ic771Z;•s M1^►5111' 67J y .�0' / % / �l/ ig jam- -' /� /l /% ! � /% j - // 26- z i/ %Y 1i: 1 11 30BUFFERYARDA! 10'IN ROW _� WI c � imummummu 7-7 I �\ cur // i ��\ >,../t o „,' N. \ ~\ \._` D1�� O No o aoEoaE®ooEEOEoo ee ®c FC-•)COC O O NO nD -,,q -+iv AS 20 G)2 O�1'.0-)V2 7!'1717�lJl�ET7-•Q-C0�-O(7 ,-� AD ND is mC) -�'a 217 <� ---I Cr r °o E(no M Q!i $ _°"11-id o° n eo 53 rnto o coo_nn ev on c,o no nn ,i np O An eo no S En o° £° £E7 cn s-, o'• fl �Ar o N R�� '"�7��QQ� id -� m 30 � OQ m a� El v� '7 °� aN »c.nco x_< n �^oa � well nn m .nn.� nn oN '" r<ocn rrn,N„rV °S S s°8 r g 0_ SEE T to 1 13 Z ' m io (° <� n= -c.coo n 3 0 0 ° Qo°r�vo r° ^° FA D l °a• o o va �`•o ^v° (n�q �' 411 O��° O � � O � •c to Otp c OO :TJp O f0b O- � O £ O_C - ZVVV 33 to a o 31p O- vn- 7.o.-•v -° no (n a yD ,- N N Zvi a< 0W � n - 7�U03 n c° nn~ oc°o � °m o o � �� Y o c7� o�_ no3. o�• 03y5 oxom< rn�� N� °o � n � v3 3- � �<_.a o p o,'rc3m ° E_7- n o n\ DIii n n > n1Q S3 -$�•i Oo a 3a n °� 3t°_ P < uc ° y° oc §° tyir3 wog' oo �.c' °.'c <- ,2o no 85 D i-N - O t O O M E0 IO rt° 3 O,n nO U UC ga C 1 y a3 O30 -rs 2 fO 52: Op °p nO NF. C4. Cg 0_,r-i.° � �� D Q .-R ,,Ti-31 O 0 0 n° O N a O T- O° ° j A° O f(7T1 y O -,-;E: 3 D_a n O n 0 ppD ITI Z7n N Ori(n %) O Ol 2- p m O.� a in�O a s 3 n N Z f C O n n\ O O O N� n n -1 ° Vl�m 3 y_ o m Q ° ° �' n3 c • cn V o X '"w D o 0 3 �' �m m a o o ��� m an ' L a a E2 "�{,ami a = In $ pp o p ' -C N p N U7 Ut (3r CP (>t O�°� (It Ur UP N N N is !'s N� -'VI NVI -'� . NVI Nin m (n 2 u+�p O 3 g"LS 3 A a O O AY <-4 ,p.•• (PC , ,p,,... js.. UtC �-X D i-o G ,D e 6 O p aC - 0 0 R X72 2--i 2 G7 R 2 G7 G7 G7 O G' T O 9 fl. 9 M ufc; N� � C�L O�O O �� £ 7� N N m O O O O O O p O O O O O O O O O 470 3 G7= GZ'= O 7 (.7-. ErI „ fl o �.fl a O o x. ° a -° o ..a 'EL' a o\ o\ ma m°- o_ m yP is�I fl v P v 1 m > > > -°° 3 g 3� > > 3 > > > > > ° -Q xn Xa XQ A fl 4- r� ?f, (0 ? N W Co 6) V U 2 N N I i, --NbbbN a NO ( sa,• AW WAVO [ u- al D °i7 T7N Vi o°- N N a- ng n UPI 5,00110001211i CANADA CROSSROADS 4TMHS ASSOCIATES,INC. a (- A-PORTION OF THE SECTION 15,T-12-S, (i'r Tori t.'N J R 13 E,G.SRBM,TOWN OF ORRO VALLEY, '\`-MUM •,. ►endecape Architecture 196 W.Simpson 5t PIMA COUNTY,ARIZONA ���•_:.:d'% Irrigation Design Tucson,AZ 85701 �„ �', Urban Deeign (520)882-9655 �� Envronmental Services Fax(520)882-4307 g i i ORO VALLEY,ARIZONA _wit,i,.i. ,, „......______.,* --. � = �, EE •�%E E F- � • , I\� ..1 \ \ ik, ` \ tit �..\ _ • _ \ \ � \ \ \._ \ Q ,,,____, i la, ,_____________/ ___.] _, ,,,h, s , , 7 , 4... ,,,(,),„ I 1 D ., �\E _ \ ,� �_E _ \,_ ,, ,.. __ , / z ( s + / 111 ��A \ \L. E E \S f \ E F \ �.� ) \`rt ‘,\ J F E\fEEE 4 E/E f 'E EEE F \\ „ \ Qg \ C / E E /,' E E F F It \ ` \� .E - . A ) f EI E /E E F E, E /'--/ / n EEEtEFEEff E �FEEEEF�E / .,,:____—J, F F �F E F wimp.fEE - EEEEFF/r `'.------11V F E F \EeFFfEfEEFF t E/ .E Fi E �lE'EF . F E F _` � '. �\ ME F6E E r E ). E E ,,./4_ F .. /E E_ F--F---4- _ E��E .__wi ,`? 1 E/ / E; ! E E % ' E E �f/E6____,-----------.____-7----- �Siip -`1f - � �- % - J \.` ) i F t 42----;-4 f �E f /E,E,� i�" -,S �-4`,�` �` ' .�7 / z J i r-\�% E Ft ,I 141, / E 4'"j \ -�/ i 4a/4 / E,/ :i / :E'' � --_ __-._�- � �EPE4�"-��h FE ;� fp. \ \ e /// i' �/EFE ,' ..• {fF�. E-f-- EFE E E -----,w.-_-_,_.,. -�� .,�-_.� -- . ,tog-a ___/ // � \1 / / iE - —4��_ - , ' _ "1 , _ - - E ` _. . �\1 -/// . I !� <3F _ .{ ' E y 7, <•1V- F• / —`E_ 4f— Y- --._F-- f`--E- E -`- *--.4--- __^ �C / /lL \ / ;• r E-- F E ,' E/ --EE -- 4 ' �E-•f-^-fo _._._v- -T---_-.�._= F� : 3 / __.) _; \, / / f' ,"" f E 1* % �� --' 2 a E t EFE---,-------,-.2.----,---__I----,--.::(_-- --�--_ a T' \� ,,t-..`y\ \\ ( /4' E , •Er /E;' .,,, ,7/'_. f E _.E.'-Ef -`-E- E E 1- -4-,____-_-4.2_�"E^ '�-` Q ''',..s. w``-`\.\1\7411•� EE ,/ EI � F/ .fE�iE�!' „- E_.4- EFEE E f-fFEEtF E fesF- �' \ :. i ' s/ , E4 _`' __-T" + Ei // �/ _„„,0 \\ \.,) \\\\, \\ .1'('40,--, I, , + ,(7.r' .,, „,4 .iiillin.. .,-,,,,,•Cii". , ._------ - -- ------All ___-----_______. _ -------j \ \ E F / EI i /- r. 11 11 Ill 5, \ \\ .ice ���c ,,,'E9%,/. ..,":1/..;A ' , l ice__', 1i`E r _..E--Y.�_----Cf./�• _.-T-"-. `', i 11 I,111 1 i .11 op--.4 i III ! 4t,�Eam• Y -F E � _ ,� 2 g' p \ % Ir. 4.14 /\ t , ___________ 1,;, f66 it" � ._____,..N N \ re,____-___. q ih „ , „, ,iri Al ••• ,...----,\\ ..\ .'‘,\\ \ \ \_.) 45 -A I, qi 11 _-_-_.•-7:---___-'-'-_7-._ \ li 1/ 14 '1 ---_____.`,\\,\ \ 's Olk 01 v/'''''\ \\\‘ ' I' \\ I!III $ _ --) 1 �' o j\\\., / ,f.r.,„ A��1 \ \ i , 'I ` , \_., co \ `� /, 1 /''1 i/ , '} I �i ; j ,1 , i ___.....,......, g I\ \ \\ I 1 \ \ \\ ----' ) \ i _ \ is.-/(fa i-c-ti I 1 1 1 \\ _____,,Mi, Ago,-0 ) \ 1 i 1 \ 5.1 11 \i'll\ \ \\ \V. r\- 411 I % \ -''kvbb'-1 L ' \\ ' 11, . \ \\. \ i.___._----. - ,'\\ \\\'',. \\114:10 -- , \ i ' ' _ ow ,eint i , (/ \-----) it"i .11 .._.,\\ , \ ,.,,,,,,\...,.., ,, it.,, j ,, , \ \ \ N ss,\.\\\,....., ,c.4.4.I /ph. I .10 - ) IN Ili; ----------____ \\„..,,,,NN\NN:\\\\\N- -______ ,_:0111,111,ih,N.6:- 1 1 \ . [ / ) ,/ kisi / big ----. , \N`s-_____.----, . -.411116,;\ \ ------- -,_._ \ \ ----, itsizs 114:, ,,\ „ \I I, 1 1 i , , 1 ____ ./ ______D ----s„.0 \\I ,,,,,...c., )„..., 1,,„," 1 ___...„\\.3\ \ k 1 1 S---- ,--) ,-.-... --.,---_- '-',S .x-mi U '. . \ ;R i '..",°] 1----, ,„,214++1 AV ,\_______ ) \\ r 8 J --"' Mgrigll A - --'-'-----------/-4,-7------ '* am,. ,,-- __.-.) )) 1 — , i A ip- Alk 73 ,_ 41\ 1§1 ; ii,?,P7, ''< - - 7- Fri - ila \\_051/00",/, ' .--) AI A AN' t, i at \\\ 4g I .1 I '''''w=1.6, 6, -.' I r r N Isi 6 • ,;----- -. ,-. / 6.-- ''AO-( ___, . 0 tp ----------------- .-i:-:: T.S,& k Np.\:,—, - / / ',.,,- \ W . 1 r %�/�-- ^- i \.. silt; \\V "\r (E • 82 1 fil rP - ,,, * ✓ ,� IVA Illi 1 i ...,A 8 Tr A > /7,---:-. 11111 1 5R -1;%1 - ba- X1..4- ,�.... ..,,,,_,...a.tiv li �--..--`7- ��.._-; N " _ A P N /,,-__----=----7-------=--_.--N,-, sr""Tvez`z',..r*- iark:c,iei', ,,44%,.. ...,-,- ' ��,� �'♦t r u � /,� Z� w`ter.+�IiG:•". :' ) ) !!;;,44.0-4, 0 rr.^ ��rs ,cam'If) ��� do 535 '--`�-�_ ,i,,, ��i `�� 9,0..,4. / ' (' -' 7 , . / ttIA / ,.., c , liik-"Jks..--*0,1im1/47,,,,,,:SS5152.7,11r:/.,-.. cle.;'6,1. O' 674':1 . ,_,_ \ 'N.. i _g6 we eNpN B O ® • 0O o oe❑o�� (.<1_ ��� 00 ❑ ❑aQaE1aDa0(LD❑ -f p NO� C)D;,.' :U2•OQ G)2 O�1 TX7�Z.ZIA�Ul Wr'1-i�-Wr OC)� r'O\7 CSD (/1D VID WC> -1"D 2� <-O �CD rm :e mo mommcv om no 00 :r cc mo 3 T` co ro0 2 °m3- oo to fo co 00 �o �- mzrDo w o O ]o a�ay c ]a o c o rn =.� rn x.S.�m 3 0 �--m y a'm o nc°i •�.0 • Nm'� m`� R1 rNi ZS� _ o < moifv v v c - R5'0' rt 3 C 31 cn° <o m_. , -c coo�000 0° �o-• o , :o o 0 0 o va �v° "b �,76 _ 3 �3 rn , 3 Qo mcs m D'y gc 1;1. - -ss �O V Z Si`.G N o,0 CO O , O. b ]- 7°O O.�-' 1httPI fmfl ,-.a � . 'o -_. -..o Orn a_ ° . , ° 0 ° Z rya � w (,T��' m o 0 0 '� m " a ° fTl V �j \ CI O O y N O a O NO Z 3 °a. ,c rW= o 0 3 0 rt° O x N ? 5.1 1 ,pp,o 3 .•. O.•0 a D]7 ilitikitg-iiiii cD (�D O 3 D Ui N U1 (l, Ui if,0107 V1 U' U, (!i (7, tJ, N tJ, ?C N'"� �' V'C NC �'" �^� NC IV�X i� g� F : i y m o 0 0 0 0. o°0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o D1� o a coo• o\ o\ mo- mo• o m x ° 0 0 o m o ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -p oo o° o° �1vilgI p 'YaQ'� 3 0 o a ] 3 3 3� ] ] > > > > ] ] x a xa >a a D m p _ J � ' 1 >S' lit t . (D O f 0 :O W N OD . O7 7.N W N g; N A 02 W 2 N ' -• N A w pN O O �� 43 a O y N O (l7 .r -' �A W W 01 W �? 1 �O N C., V O� �.I � O � Z N __ -- W-' '';->„, �, rno a v i oobobo,"bboobbo ,o - I z- 10:010019 / 11 °°'°°° CANADA CROSSROADS 't igli , r TMHS ASSOCIATES,INC. (— liffi A PORTION OF THE SECTION 15,T-12-S, R-13-E, I 11 R-13-E,G•SRBM,TOWN OF ORRO VALLEY, W.211scson 131. �, PIMA COUNTY,ARIZONA ,� Design Tucson,AZ 8,5701 . ' pe e82-9655 GP 1 r «rne Services Fu(5 0)882-4307 i ORO VALLEY,ARIZONA •Ti i- -i W. .j1' ii_ 7.-___--z_::,,_______, -\.,\--,.•: ::- .----___=_-7-_-_____--------,\ . .\---,-:_-:_-E"_-.-"L--- ---- -:-.---e::-::- -- _-:::---T----.__---::-,---__.1---------- -- ' ,.--:',---:---..1--- , ,‘L,)/Pi li I ,)I r\\________. __-___________ \ ------_-:-.,.- ,-.,--,,,,,,_ ,--_,-:,•,---.1,-,:z.„-,-, N,\\1, /,,,jr ii i -------L---77-------:----------,`„- ----=,-, .,-, -'\-\\\N .\\)\--t /il I 1 , ,..._:--_ \ -______ -, _— --.--_,-.-- , \L. /7 ii it\„._ ---- ______ i I N \s- 1 1 t '--,- /i/ 2, 2 a _ _------ 257 \ ...,,,,,,,.,....------1:-.--,,,,..,,.1 _____,--: / 2. .___...u-------„_.._____.__.T--------_.___.________ _lgtmLs.............- --/-----,-----------___________z=L____,___ ----------.__.._ .117565_—___------:. ------ . s'N..,C0 ' ---, --_2--1-4_ ----1 /// ow �•.,.``__._i-----.._.__.__-___._. — �.\�- �� .cam.� al .1--__=_____ ..:.._vii-d------_____--_______----7------ _ .4.11 --------....„.„ T------ \\ i ,, i if i ppm ---_g. g _. -�\ — -:-.- ?� - \�\-z-----,-----------------_—__ ___'-- �`\ \��'�\; i,1� �, d � iV - 1 ?, 2,a1------------ - ---------- .-- - --- —---11-7.- • -- --------- ---------‘1--:-1---- `-'-'-'s _.„..ktip -'"kit i\,V\, \ ,/// i -=-S-_ ,-,•• -4,_\. .' , t,i 7 ft'i,! \\\\ , (/ 1 i � � 254D ` \ . \\ s ` � ,il\r\ ,\/\ji//I, )\ I ------ ---, __________..-1,-------- -----------\\1\., 4* \ ,1 ' ' il \ \\\ ii I i gi 1 ---__ -_______--- ------ __ \ - , \\- \ \� I, tii\il\ti, 7y,i 1 li .i N N �;g o 1 K < - 1\, >\\\lil 11 i la" Tiftlr..//,',,� 1IIig Ali I;� 1 �`> N Iva - 1 _ __2------1_____. - r /Ai,� \ \ \,,L\ c::\ \ ` i(.,17:c _____. -/�I 11 il 4 14 P- 1 ' --N. s 3 ,_.._) ( ---'.._._-------- - 11':_Zflio71-7 ""( ' -1 \ \\Mbl \.,, I 1,,-. Ain------'-7--'77_,=-----7/it 1-3/15-- 'll-_--- -----ii:---'7) C,',:\ CI\--'III 1 ‘ l''''''-;;;;:'"I'\ik\ \\\4\ . !AAA ---'-----;-------___,„7:_-.- )!, i -% ) \ -' . ,I,,,,,,--,___,,, _ , 1! 11 i4 gi 0 \ ii a J . — __t"04 ic mi !'—�—. --- ��. •s -- _ / 1\413' 1� \ rr,i i i 4\ a %/ >� •\ •. \\ �\ _ i • /1 ii„q ., 11111; A / / ----- `1 1 ‘7.,. 7, \.\ ii._} z i 1, v i i i a C(-n / /J \IIIL, LA______\1 \ i ) . cil l3 \ Cry11' ,\\\\- i\ ai g •.cA �."i���.o /illi • •� I -t+ ti / / ____O____ , 'N V 4� ili�� kI fill i — \ — i \ l's — — ;� /' , et! ) \ \1\ / I0 \ r_ ill i fill \ \ I \ /A 1/4'. t \ '1/4\\\ \ ra`ii //.!!!/ is��';�1//1" i v r, \ --- ---- --..--",,_____:„.N_ / aro ,,, \ \ ,,,,,1 t -___".-- _, 1 i.--- 1 -- -------, , J i --,- 111 ii , \\ \ „..,- )0.4. , 1 1 1-- -7/ lir-- -- -- - -- -- -- -- - -- -- - ,i 4 �1 ) ' 1 IIIIIIIIIPWFIgiL............,rup.. . tij p. i ) t• -traMillia ----” -algallihnja- Id / / 1 .3,--. e 1 -::-- - ,I- v. . ---,-,-,,---,., •____-__ _____esi=7;_- )- ..., \ -- - ..,...---, ,- a z.-•--- -- - -..a-1/4 • _ ........,-- — -—...! X11 l am_ .- - - ----- r lir G3: , 1/;,' ' \ //! %/ /rr j/r (f" i// //! ---��--.—/-!---- r r 1 \ \\ 1 1 II17. I I IIII II1-1-:±f IIfi` III '� _ - r-) \ OIttlItItlit 9 A to N to o?-§ 41 1' D rn ;- &�+L-+a.o§thCO 1-+1-�� urn�_l I ipi 'e19_O -�� o"o r ,nom- K1111 0 ° Vatli%Fi -pry, -lQ-p4 gSg4. — (p �4= s g,-0 pE n i o la p0 pg, t a�6�pm S t3- 3 3 o Q 03 i a i i;J 7 a, .Q 6 n 0 i D tio, , 1 gip • ig ° t.._ a (0 ch 401 lug lion '.,33 $ i°<f4u?q 3 3 o §.[31 ° ° ° `fid'"Ig 31 .° `c o° 00Li O 1 42iP , c� N u N o 1.0•.....10 i i i 1 i i i CANADA CROSSROADS oF. TMHS ASSOCIATES,INC. A d T-12—S ' ' ' (— I A PORTION OF THE SECTION 15, h •DD C. a ' a R-13—E,GsSRBM,TOWN OF ORRO VALLEY, .:a. 'gym' Landscape Architecttre t96 W.Simpson St / •/'` Irrigation Design Tucson,AZ 85701 PIMA COUNTY,ARIZONA ! r.,''� Urban Design (520)882-9655 c" v cJ 1 Environmental Services Fax(520).2-4307 i ; 1 ORO VALLEY,ARIZONA R-ID i i 7-_T.-------::--T.E.7-------\.\,-,'\\-:„\\: ------- ------------------- \ ,,, . ) 1 , , ,fi-c'r ____ ___,,,.-/,' - ---, , \ N\ ,„ \ \ ......, ; , , \ \'\ \ --, st\\ ..--1 ‘ _____--- __________, .P , \ N— . I . `,11 ) \ 1 1\ \V \ \ .---\ \ , \ \ \ ‘‘ ..—_,} 1 ,.....\\..\ \ \ •\...„ .— \\ \\, \ _ . s.-- . \,...mumis 2: A 'T \ ) ) i , i ( ( `- '---., ) ----_.--:::-..---..., a F., /7/ ,/V- — a 1 to . 1/ )// ---J —4110 _Lo\ -., \...._ i' r --- "1 ,_ p g,,, _>z ( \ ' / /ii_______/,___:_i_____-_:, / / / !/ -/-- ;___. 2550 _- -i n / ; j _:_.f....,_,_/_,_,..../_/: :1_1: / I c ,,.,'--v _.,....- .......-- _ U��7 i �r , `.\�-J 1 / ,-'�/i /rte ,/�/��/i/�.i,�'j' _- 2545 -� --_..._~`-.,tiri.,„ / ��`\�;` ;'/ / ! ' gM ;��' _,-�i--' -540 `a'--—�-—— ��---�ji , aa — \ \ ;:,ri------i____ \„,,m\(,\itt cI 1 t /i lr�/ /��� __ Q ` -�tot \ \\ � e i l 7„,,,,,, i', -�..� '-,,)<-3 „ \\..\,\-,-, — -,'_.,, , . iik _-- ------: ir itNiilim , \ \ r� ,___� / , I• Iliga ►� ,., , \ _ ' \-4 N\ __ ____--- ,.•-f -___ _____---- ,...,________ i \\\\-----r_T_____----(/ ____ .......: .. . /.....--,--______---,----,. rep_ _-�/\\ r\ �il II► yam. 0 41 1; _____--—------......_ , ., ---_--....,. 4' Ad 15 -----__—_,,-- • ,z--,>—,\-, ', \\\.,,\\\ \ 1 -.1" ._,// _—________ , ,2 , /..,-v---;•\\ \ \\.!\\\ .._ ,-, , ,,ca , 8 ,i -------------------'' ' \ tj /7-',\ \\N.': . ) \\\\ ; \ I ffi 4) e '1 g D -`�\1,\\ o j ice.- \ 1;`; ��a,11 z 1ir \( \\ \ \ I I I \ P� , D / / II 1 i /.•-/,' i 11 i 1 1 1 i J..r�- 1 /A/ I 1 \ \ ,' \11,\.;I \ i \. rm, ‘,0 ;ilt A .„,.._) / ) I ) i1(-.4.t 1 , \ , ,.._______,,,,L,,ii '` 6 i / ( `\\\ \\ Ei 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I t f 'C y a 4 i o i' \\\\ \ J ( 4 I I ; i ro it !ar, ,—_,-\\ 1 \ \ \,` �. \ iI y 1 I , 1 - t:-.---_ li a:i V\ \\\ .-,, ' 6.: ) \ i\I \ 11 _,..,_,. , , ----___:, —„,,,.. ,Iti . N _ .. ;,im \\ .,,,k-__ mss- , 1I 1 ) ' i `.� itsw Mk\ \\ \11 I 4 i Vit_ \ ) ' I it& RI \\ .�— ) \ 5-- �/ 5"T\.1 \ , v -/.;�`/ I`I� � _ is ,, "— _ .�\ lum —. \ o Ull' \.\ 44. — , , 11 6. I ice/---- �-�� \ 1 a� \ \\..�/ -A.-- ,.7 j_ =i 6 6, iyiy_� i_��-�. V• . ,,, / / • ,..-,, \\\„,\ 4,....„1, — .......4.,./, / iv 1 ;,-;. --.,,,/-.... ,.----/- 7 \ , _,_ \ , .t.,— \ \ ,, ..___ 1 ;�`/ '�`� ; ; i - ,gill I -- -.-,---'-,------------ I c.'''''' V41441%.7M---),A „1 , ___i t ,i -- , --- - _ rig . _.,,,,_____. ..._______ ,, �� VS _ r .. .s a - s. \ `� _- � ;* — 72; —J/' ____ ___11,. �' :s'is X35 -.___—::::—_--::_----_s________:_____-- 1 ,. Ali %,/ ---2 7/ - 'i 7/7' ;4/ /7/ / ,W /7 -----77--------t 1 1 \,_ ( \\ N. \ -,. ■ 1 �, , s `I•poa O 1 1 1n ® ZI ®o — 4s;• +: N-o u- :,n N - a . a 1 2n ym I 8 Oi To ..„,-i11 \V O $ 5 ° ,1Ntill y ,,, a (S1441 -.- d-d` ,, fhaa '°9 1 it ,°°ora a,K .g,3q r+ ?-ilitiAl'Ili/i i“ S' l � ' g°- ' �bn� ln�nw^abi$� u1!00iP Z !P p 3 3 �� 1411 Q(D O al R ii!? —'v° n1ihi ;a o A. 4iii§.1:31 3 , .T-,, , li-:-..il z i ,, A o. no. $-ff° na -ooS q. ra u 086 u I � o 11 P $ , 1...;poill CANADA CROSSROADS 5 TMHS ASSOCIATES,INC. /DAV q 4 1 (— A PORTION OF THE SECTION 15,T-12-8, '24191 ; ; St R-13-E,CASRBM,TOWN OF ORRO VALLEY, '\� 1 Landscape ArcNiedure 198 W.Simpson Ul - Irrigation Design Tucson,AZ 85701 a, PIMA COUNTY,ARIZONA �l,-- Urban Design (520)882-9655 m O7 _ - Environmental Services Fax(520)882-4307 s 2 ® i I$ g 4 ORO VALLEY,ARIZONA I 7 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: April 7, 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL FROM: Dennis Silva, Jr., Planner I SUBJECT: OV12-98-18 SIGMA TECHNOLOGIES EXPANSION, DEVELOPMENT PLAN, LOCATED ON LOT 1 OF THE FOOTHILLS BUSINESS PARK, WEST OF THE ALLIED SIGNAL BUILDING BACKGROUND: VVC Design, representing Sigma Technologies, request Town Council approval of an expansion to an existing development. The existing development is 5.08 acres, with a 40,000 square foot building envelope, located on Lot 1 of the Foothills Business Park. The proposed expansion consists of an additional 5,000 square feet, on the northeast corner of the existing building. The subject property is abutted on the north by Oracle Road, to the south by Lot 2, to the east by Allied Signal, and west by N. Stallard Place and Lot 12. The zoning for this project is Campus Park Industrial (CPI) in the La Reserve PAD and the existing use is industrial. SUMMARY: Sigma Technologies proposes to expand their existing 40,000 square foot building by 5,000 square feet. The naximum total building coverage allowed under the La Reserve PAD is 33%. The actual building coverage for this site with the expansion will be 20%. There are 165 existing off-street parking spaces, including six handicapped accessible spaces. The proposed expansion is less than 25% of the entire development. Therefore, no landscape plan was required for this project. The existing off-street parking is designed in accordance with Pima County development standards, and does not need modification to Oro Valley design and planning standards because of the small percentage of expansion. The public art requirement is also waived from this project for the same reason. GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE: The Sigma Technologies expansion development plan complies with Policy 9.1A, ensuring that the building height and bulk will be moderate to low intensity and in harmony with individual site attributes. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD ACTION: The proposed expansion of Sigma Technologies was recommended for approval by the DRB on January 12, 1999 by a6-0 vote. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the proposed expansion for Sigma Technologies at Foothills Business Park as it neets the OVZCR and complies with the General Plan. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 2 SUGGESTED MOTION: —The Council may wish to consider one of the following motions: I move to approve OV 12-98-18 Sigma Technologies Expansion Development Plan, attached herewith. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Reduced Copy of the Development Plan 'Eri-a...ir 1\63,f,,,.. (6• 1)LC P : ing and Zoning Administra 4r �; , /140i !r.. o►jar Co o. . unity Deve Ir• ent Dir: tor / / 4 Town Man._: F:\ov\ovi2\1998\12-98-18\DPTC.RPT ' -'�'«-y+. ........}.,..,,.;..,'s.��:l:'s..,.,,._��.,..N.�..nJr.',...•..........:�:-. . _. ._... ... . . L -_ F . " .S7 rQ iSs•,a r . rLT Z .-----------m--'"''''"''''''''';'"'-'''''''''''', --FwvZm'''ti.}',n.7ff.:.,+ f .; -'. '' r«s-:.te,. :g^4TC r z, . � „ t'":-7 ^- ' : y =rt. ':.± i ':S.f� : - t '''€'.'.':', .• .:4 •K.. _ „a.11,.'',,,,f:,1....$.2".:: ;:17:7::!'-',.� .-t.r,.... ,k...,..t'. lm._i s':: .- ;{., ""5.r.r ,s�: : , ,.. :. ... _ -:, ••••,4,-,,,,i.'i,.. ll.n. ':•;;...:•:' ,f..¢1'''',i: r 1f �Ytt:r"X3. .t.. .'''''13"..'`-'..:.:C7,7' . . ..9.. .:r, . �. ts . ..... - . : ..:'.:1'..., , ..T7,. efFL . w+t'''',;:',.4;-"..,.. �r. ''.> : .. : .v:+ . ..... ... .,.';'-'",'''...:•:•':_:::.,„.1:-- .... ,,,,i.,,,...:_:,,-;.....,,,„-.: Y. ,,y . , « 1 • • • tCt ._ .t ..:R-r...0y� t:, .. .. ? ? . >Y{'ryf���, �ai' " 1 + ..r7 : 'fid, fi, i r tl.'„'t rI' y k y .s ..-`..•••.-.•..,...,)::,',.,.4..?...,,..;..,:,,,,,„....;,-..;„- ,.t .1: TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 18 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: April 7, 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & TOWN COUNCIL FROM: Chuck Sweet, Town Manager SUBJ: Extending the Terms of the Fire Advisory Committee Members SUMMARY: The Oro Valley Fire Advisory Committee is comprised of five members whose terms are due to expire the end of May 1999. At the present time, the Fire Advisory Committee, in conjunction with Town Staff and the consulting firm, Emergency Services Consulting Group (ESCG) is in the middle of the work necessary to develop a Strategic Plan for Fire and Emergency Services in Oro Valley. Based upon the work completed to date by ESCG and remaining tasks to be completed according to their contract, it is anticipated that the Strategic Plan for Fire and Emergency Services will not be ready for Council action until the middle or end of June 1999. Therefore it is suggested that the terms of the Fire Advisory Committee be extended to a point of time that would include the completion of the Strategic Plan. ATTACHMENTS: None RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended that the terms for the Fire Advisory Committee Members be extended from May 1999 to July 31, 1999. FISCAL IMPACT: None SUGGESTED MOTION: I make a motion to extend the terms of the Fire Advisory Committee members from May 31, 1999 to July 31, 1999. . I1 . c / • Town Manager