Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPackets - Council Packets (1533)Town Council Meeting Regular Session April 21, 2021 Council meeting will resume at or after x:xx p.m. Town Council Meeting Announcements Upcoming Meetings Meetings are subject to change. Check the Town website for meeting status. Board of Adjustment -CANCELED April 27 at 3 p.m. Via Zoom Historic Preservation Commission May 03 at 5 p.m. Via Zoom Planning and Zoning Commission May 04 at 6 p.m. Via Zoom Town Council Regular Session and Budget Study Session May 05 at 6 p.m. Via Zoom Mckenna Manzo Spotlight on Youth Westward Look Resort Annexation April 21, 2021 Tonight's Process and Order Consideration of the Preannexation Development Agreement (PADA) (#1) If approved, Council then considers annexation petition (#2) If annexed, following another public hearing, Council will consider land use items: Designates Translational Zoning per State Law (#3A) Considers General Plan Amendment for 4.6 acres (#3B) Considers rezoning of property (#3C) Benefits of Annexation •Increased corporate boundaries by 32.52 square miles •48 successful annexations Oro Valley Annexation History Item #1 Pre -Annexation Development Agreement (PADA) PADA -Purpose and Summary of Major Provisions •Sets parameters by which both parties will benefit from the annexation. •Specifies PADA, annexation, translational zoning and rezoning/PAD must be considered in same meeting •Town Council cannot make zoning changes for 15 years without owner concurrence Summary of Major PADA Provisions (Cont.) Town accepts Ina Road right-of-way for maintenance Also responsible for design and construction of future improvements Town accepts first 1,500 feet (approx.) of Westward Look Drive, to first residential street. Repave within one year following annexation Design and install landscape improvements up to $350,000 Maintain historical character Repave trail on property within two fiscal years, subject to public easement Waive development impact fees for future development on the property Waive site plan permit/review fees for all development;50% of building permit fees for future commercial development Fiscal Impact to Town Annual net increase to Town revenues for resort only -$755,000 escalating to $916,000 at buildout (10 years) Additional net revenue per year at full build out -$61,000 - $562,000, depending on final development plan One-time construction sales tax and other fees -est. $2.1 -$3.3 million Total net revenues over 20 years -$16.8 -$23.8 million Cost to Town for improvements/fee waivers –est. $1.5 -$1.9 million Questions on PADA Item #2 Public Hearing Pursuant to A.R.S. Section 9-471 Considering the Annexation of the Westward Look Resort Purpose Required Public Hearing to consider proposed annexation of Westward Look Resort 78-acre property Included in Priority 1 area of the T own Annexation Strategy Second Public Hearing related to the proposed annexation Annexation Process Process by which municipalities incorporate new territory into municipal boundaries Governed by State Law Petitions must be signed by more than 50% of property owners, representing more than 50% of the assessed valuation of real and personal property Petition must be filed with the Pima County Recorder within one year after the last day of the 30-day waiting period (October 28, 2021) Timeline and Next Steps If approved, Annexation Ordinance effective May 21, 2021 Town Clerk files signed petitions with Pima County Recorder's Office Town Clerk sends adopted Annexation Ordinance to the Clerk of the Pima County Board of Supervisors Town begins collecting local sales taxes in May 2021, which will be reflective on the June 2021 sales tax summary FY21/22 Recommended Budget updated Questions on Annexation Item Public Hearing: Westward Look Resort Translational Zoning, General Plan Amendment and Rezoning Town Council April 21, 2021 Purpose Resort Westward Look Guest Ranches Westward Look Estates Catalina VillageWestward Look Heights 23 Key Considerations Item A –Translational Zoning Pima County CR-1 Town R1-36 Homes per acre 1 home per 36,000 sf 1 home per 36,000 sf Minimum lot size 36,000 sf 36,000 sf CR-1 TownPima County Item B –General Plan Amendment Existing Proposed NCO NCO NCO R/GCR/GCR/GCR/GC LDR 26 Item B –General Plan Amendment Criteria Analysis Item C -Rezoning Town Ina Road Existing –Translational R1-36 (if approved as part of Item A)Proposed –Planned Area Development Resort Future Development 28 CONCEPT A Resort Gateway –West Boutique Retail and Restaurant Building Height: 28 feet (2 stories) Setbacks: 105 feet Resort Gateway –East Multi-family Residential Building Height: 40 feet (3 stories) 28 feet (2 stories) Setbacks: 120 feet CONCEPT B Resort Gateway –West Residential Villas (Townhomes) Building Height: 28 feet (2 stories) Setbacks: 85 feet Resort Gateway –East Commercial, Restaurant, Hotel, Office Building Height: 40 feet (3 stories) 28 feet (2 stories) Setbacks: 50 feet (Office) 120 feet (Mixed Use) CONCEPT C Resort Gateway –West Office and Retail Building Height: 28 feet (2 stories) Setbacks: 120 feet Resort Gateway –East Multi-family Residential and/or Hotel Building Height: 40 feet (3 stories) 28 feet (2 stories) Setbacks: 170 feet 29 Public Participation Planning and Zoning Commission Conditions of Approval 1.The intent of the PAD is for the Resort Gateway areas to be a mix of residential and non-residential uses. To clarify this as a requirement, revise Section II.C.i.b. (Page 68) as follows: All uses permitted under the C-N (Neighborhood Commercial District) of the OVZC shall be allowed within the Resort Gateway except as modified by the following sections. The Resort Gateway areas are not permitted to be fully built out with only residential development, but rather a mix of residential and non-residential uses. Residential only uses may not comprise more than 20% (approximately 15 acres) of the entire PAD as stipulated in the modified development standards Table II.1.E.ii.b. 2. Revise all graphics depicting Concept C to include a non-residential component to be consistent with Section II.C.i.b. 3. Include a Section reference in Table II.1.e.ii.b (maximum 20% requirement for residential) to Section II.C.i.b. for clarity 4. Revise westernmost and easternmost buildings in Concept A Resort Gateway -East to a maximum of 2 story. 5. Revise all 2 story buildings to a maximum of 28 feet Two Public Hearings Recommend approval of Items A and B and conditional approval of Item C All conditions have been addressed Summary Item A –Translational Zoning Item B –General Plan Amendment Item C -Rezoning Remedies existing zoning discrepancies Enables future development on Ina Road Incorporates a number of mitigation measures to minimize impacts Compatibility with neighbors Economic benefit to the larger community Conformance with all applicable General Plan and Zoning standards Commission recommends approval of Items A and B and conditional approval of Item C Westward Look Planned Area Development Westward Look Planned Area Development Existing Proposed General Plan Designations Existing Proposed CONCURRENT TYPE 2 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL/OFFICE •Less than 5 acres in size •90% Compliance with applicable General Plan criteria Ina Rd Ina Rd Ina Rd ILLUSTRATIVE CONCEPT B: Mixed-Use Commercial Center, Restaurant, Office/Casitas •Approximately 76,000 sf of gross floor area •Two-stories at 28’; Three Stories at 40’ ILLUSTRATIVE CONCEPT C: Luxury Apartment Complex/ Hotel •Approximately 400,000 sf or 250 units •Two-stories at 28’; Three Stories at 40’ RESORT GATEWAY EAST ILLUSTRATIVE CONCEPTS ILLUSTRATIVE CONCEPT A: Luxury Apartment Complex & Potential Integrated Commercial •184 one-two-and three-bedroom units •Two-stories at 28’; Three Stories at 40’ Westward Look Planned Area Development Ina Rd Ina Rd ILLUSTRATIVE CONCEPT A: Boutique Retail Restaurant •Approximately 30,000 sf of gross floor area •Two-stories at 28’ Ina Rd RESORT GATEWAY WEST ILLUSTRATIVE CONCEPTS Ina Rd Ina Rd ILLUSTRATIVE CONCEPT B: Residential Villas •38 one-and two-bedroom units •Two-stories at 28’ ILLUSTRATIVE CONCEPT C: Office Plaza and Retail •Approximately 35,000 sf of gross floor area •Two-stories at 28’ Applicant mails letter to neighbors 8/21/2020 Informational video posted to OVProjects.com 8/31/2020 Official OV Meeting notice Applicant and Neighbor meeting 10.6.20 Applicant and Neighbor meeting 10.9.20 Applicant and Neighbor meeting 10.14.20 Web Based Fully Interactive Zoom Meeting 10/15/2020 Planning and Zoning Commission 1/5/2021 Applicant Hosted Zoom Meeting With Neighbors 1/6/2021 Mayor and Council 4/21/2021 Applicant and Neighbor Zoom Meeting 12/15/2020 Web Based Fully Interactive Zoom Meeting 9/15/2020 Planning and Zoning Commission 2/2/2021 NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH AND INTERACTION 45-50 additional calls and individual visits and email exchanges Resort Recreation Luxury Apartment Complex Ina Rd 1.Increased Setbacks-The parking areas and buildings were rearranged to increase building setbacks. Buildings are now approx. 120’from eastern property boundary. 2.Increased Setbacks-Buildings adjacent to Westward Look Drive have been relocated internal to the project. 3.Building Heights-All 2-story buildings have been reduced to 28’. 4.Landscape Buffer Yards-Buffer yards have been increased to 50’ (natural & enhanced). 36” boxed trees shall be used in eastern buffer yard. 5.Increased Recreation Area Size resulted in the reduction of number of buildings. 6.Parking Lot Lighting-Lighting within 85’ of adjacent residential restricted to 5’in height. 7.Revised Entry for increased vehicular stacking. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Westward Look Planned Area Development RESORT GATEWAY EAST CONCEPT A REVISIONS Revisions: 1.Building Heights-2-Story buildings within 85’ of adjacent residential reduced to 28’. 2.Landscape Bufferyards-Buffer yards have been increased to 50’ (natural & enhanced). 36” boxed trees shall be used in eastern buffer yard and planted to create a continuous canopy. 3.Parking Lot Lighting-Lighting within 85’ of adjacent residential restricted to 5’in height. 4.Privacy-2-Story buildings within 85’ of adjacent residential shall not have balconies facing residential. Westward Look Planned Area Development RESORT GATEWAY EAST CONCEPT B REVISIONS 1 2 3 4 Resort Recreation Ina Rd Luxury Apartments/Hotel Revisions: 1.Landscape Buffers-Buffer yards have been increased to 50’ (natural & enhanced). 36” boxed trees planted to create a continuous canopy shall be used in eastern buffer yard. 2.Parking Lot Lighting-Lighting within 85’ of adjacent residential restricted to 5’in height. 1 2 RESORT GATEWAY EAST CONCEPT C REVISIONS Westward Look Planned Area Development RESORT GATEWAY WEST CONCEPT B REVISIONS Westward Look Planned Area Development Revisions: 1.Building Heights-2-Story buildings within 85’ of adjacent residential have been reduced to 28’. 2.Increased Setbacks-The parking and residences have been revised to increase building setbacks. Most buildings are now 130’ (approximate)from western property boundary. 3.Landscape buffers adjacent to wash will be receiving groups for mature transplants. Residential Villas 1 3 2 Westward Look Planned Area Development EASTERN PROPERTY BOUNDARY SECTION Westward Look Planned Area Development WESTERN PROPERTY BOUNDARY SECTION •Senior Care Facilities are prohibited within all Westward Look areas. Within theSection C. Proposed Land Uses section of the Westward Look PAD, add “Senior Care Facility” to the lists of “Prohibited Uses” within the “Resort Land Uses” and “Resort Gateway Land Uses”. •Revise Concept B and update all “PAD Development Regulations” to specify and illustrate a ninety foot minimum setback from the eastern Westward Look property line only for the building area labeled “Mixed Use Office/Casitas”.Furthermore, the “Mixed Use Office /Casitas” buildings adjacent to the eastern property line may not exceed 28’ and two stories in height or utilize balconies. Questions? Westward Look Planned Area Development Westward Look Planned Area Development