Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPackets - Council Packets (1540) AGENDA ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION MAY 5, 1999 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11,000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS —TOWN MANAGER The Mayor and Council may consider and/or take action on the items listed below: ORDER OF BUSINESS: MAYOR WILL REVIEW THE ORDER OF THE MEETING CALL TO AUDIENCE —According to the Arizona Open Meeting Law, the Town Council may only discuss matters listed on the Town Council Agenda. Matters brought up by the public under "Call to Audience" cannot be discussed by the Town Council as they have not been placed on the agenda. Any items must be addressed to the whole Council, not a specific member. In order to speak during "Call to Audience", please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. 1. CONSENT AGENDA (Consideration and/or possible action) A. Minutes —4/5/99; 4/7/99; 4/12/99 B. Building Codes Activity Report— March 1999 C. Award of Contract for Project No. 101-310-623-99/1 — 1999 Slurry/Crack Seal & Reconstruction Program to Southern Arizona Paving & Construction in the amount of$45,978.20 D. OV12-99-1 Villages of La Canada Preliminary Plat (Property located on the northeast corner of Congressional Way and North La Canada Drive) E. OV12-99-5 Oro Valley Town Hall Addition Development Plan (Property located east of La Canada Drive and South of Naranja Drive) F. OV12-99-5 Oro Valley Town Hall Addition Landscape Plan (Property located east of La Canada Drive and South of Naranja Drive) G. Award of Bids for Capital Improvements related to interconnection of the assumption of the OV#1 water customers into the Oro Valley Water Utility System, Project No. WOV#1-0199, OV-1 Interconnect, Priority A— Main Extension H. Award of Bids for Capital Improvements related to interconnection of the assumption of the OV#1 water customers into the Oro Valley Water Utility System, Project No. WOV#1-0299, OV-1 Interconnect, Priority A— Old Linda Vista Booster Station Improvements I. Award of Bids for Capital Improvements related to interconnection of the assumption of the OV#1 water customers into the Oro Valley Water Utility System, Project No. WOV#1-0399, OV-1 Interconnect, Priority A— Miscellaneous PRV and Valve Installations 2. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING — ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-22 — OV8- 99-2 COPPER MOUNTAIN ASSEMBLY OF GOD REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ESTABLISH A COMMUNITY SERVICE AGENCY FOR SPRINGBOARD, A TEMPORARY SHELTER FOR ABUSED, ADOLESCENT WOMEN TO BE LOCATED AT THE COPPER MOUNTAIN ASSEMBLY OF GOD, ON THE NORTH SIDE OF TANGERINE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 1/4 MILE WEST OF LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD (CONTINUED FROM APRIL 7, 1999) PUBLIC HEARING TO BE CONTINUED AGAIN TO A FUTURE TOWN COUNCIL MEETING 3. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING — ORDINANCE NO. (0199-32 OV9-99- 67 & OV9-99-68, BRAUN AND CATHOLIC DIOCESE PROPERTIES, MAP 2 TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY SR TO ORO VALLEY R1-144 WITH CHURCH AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ENTITLEMENTS (CONTINUED FROM APRIL 12, 1999) 4. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-36 AMENDING THE ORO VALLEY TOWN CODE TO REVISE THE SPEED LIMIT FOR WOODBURNE AVENUE BETWEEN ARROWSMITH DRIVE AND RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD 5. PUBLIC HEARING — ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-37 AMENDMENTS TO THE 1996 GENERAL PLAN FOR 4 ACRES IN ORO VALLEY, KNOWN AS THE ALBEE PROPERTY (PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTHEAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF FIRST AVENUE AND PALISADES ROAD 6. PUBLIC HEARING — ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-38 AMENDMENTS TO THE 1996 GENERAL PLAN FOR 3,909 ACRES IN ORO VALLEY, KNOWN AS THE WINCHESTER PROPERTY (PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTHEAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF FIRST AVENUE AND PALISADES ROAD) REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE TO MAY 19, 1999 7. PUBLIC HEARING — LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION GIANT CONVENIENCE STORE AND GAS STATION #6813, 12885 NORTH ORACLE ROAD, REQUEST FOR SERIES 10 BEER & WINE ONLY 8. PROPOSAL FOR TOWN HALL ART BY MATTHEW MOUTAFIS 9. RESPONSE TO U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE REGARDING DRAFT ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF CRITICAL HABITAT DESIGNATION FOR THE CACTUS FERRUGINOUS PYGMY OWL TOWN MANAGER'S REPORT ENGINEER'S REPORT FINANCE DIRECTOR'S REPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S REPORT POLICE CHIEF'S REPORT WATER UTILITY DIRECTOR'S REPORT COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS CALL TO AUDIENCE—According to the Arizona Open Meeting Law, the Town Council may only discuss matters listed on the Town Council Agenda. Matters brought up by the public under"Call to Audience"cannot be discussed by the Town Council, as they have not been placed on the agenda. Any items must be addressed to the whole Council, not a specific member. In order to speak during "Call to Audience", please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. ADJOURNMENT POSTED: 04/29/99 4:30 P.M. lh A packet of agenda materials as listed above is available for public inspection at least 24 hours prior to the Council meeting in the office of the Town Clerk between the hours of 8:30 a.m. — 5:OOp.m. The Town of Oro Valley complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If any person with a disability needs any type of accommodation, please notify Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk, at 297-2591. INSTRUCTIONS TO SPEAKERS Members of the public have the right to speak during any posted public hearing. However, those items not listed as a public hearing are for consideration and action by the Town Council during the course of their business meeting. Members of the public may be allowed to speak on these topics at the discretion of the Chair. If you wish to address the Town Council on any item(s) on this agenda, please complete a speaker card located on the Agenda table at the back of the room and give it to the Town Clerk. Please indicate on the speaker card which item number and topic you wish to speak on, or if you wish to speak during "Call to Audience", please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. Please step forward to the podium when the Mayor announces the item(s) on the agenda which you are interested in addressing. 1. Please state your name and address for the record. 2. Speak only on the issue currently being discussed by Council. Please organize your speech, you will only be allowed to address the Council once regarding the topic being discussed. 3. Please limit your comments to 3 minutes. 4. During "Call to Audience" you may address the Council on any issue you wish. 5. Any member of the public speaking must speak in a courteous and respectful manner to those present. Thank you for your cooperation. MINUTES OF THE ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL AND MUNICIPAL PROPERTY CORPORATION (MPC) BOARD OF DIRECTORS STUDY SESSION APRIL 5, 1999 ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11,000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE CALL TO ORDER: 6:10 p.m. PRESENT: Oro Valley Town Council: Paul Loomis, Mayor Dick Johnson, Vice Mayor Francis LaSala, Council Member Wayne Bryant, Council Member EXCUSED: Paul Parisi, Council Member Municipal Property Corporation Steve Lucas Board of Directors: Tom Vetrano Wendell Cheek OVERVIEW OF MUNICIPAL PROPERTY CORPORATION (MPC) STATUTE AUTHORITY AND HISTORY Fred Rosenfeld, Bond Counsel with Gust Rosenfeld, gave the background of how the municipal property corporation was formed and why cities and towns use a municipal property corporation. REVIEW OF MUNICIPAL PROPERTY CORPORATION (MPC) ACTIVITIES REGARDING UPCOMING TOWN PROJECTS: A) ORO VALLEY WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT #1 PROJECT B) NEW DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUILDING Mark Reider, Bond Advisor with Peacock, Hislop, Staley & Given, Inc. reviewed the MPC debt financing and reviewed the proposal for issuance of approximately $4,435,000 of municipal facilities revenue bonds for Oro Valley Water Improvement District#1 Project; the new Development Services Building and repayment of the Tucson Settlement Agreement. DISCUSSION WITH MUNICIPAL PROPERTY CORPORATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS 04/05/99 Minutes, Council & MPC Board of Directors Study Session 2 g Mr. Reider stated this will be brought back to the Council on May 19th to provide them with updated information and ask the Council to adopt an authorizing resolution, giving permission to move forward with the bond sale. Town Manager Chuck Sweet and Fred Rosenfeld explained that a resolution required by the IRS is coming before the Council that makes a public statement that the Town intends to reimburse itself from a tax-exempt bond issue. ADJOURNMENT A MOTION was made by Vice Mayor Johnson to ADJOURN the meeting at 7:15 p.m. MOTION seconded by Council Member Bryant. MOTION carried 4—0. Respectfully submitted, at.4.44)-, Kathryn E. Cuvelier, CMC Town Clerk MINUTES ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION APRIL 7, 1999 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11,000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER 6:05 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Paul Loomis, Mayor Dick Johnson, Vice Mayor Paul Parisi, Council Member Fran LaSala, Council Member Wayne Bryant, Council Member EXECUTIVE SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM MOTION: A MOTION was made by Vice Mayor Johnson and SECONDED by Council Member LaSala to go into Executive Session at 6:05 p.m. for the following purpose: Pursuant to ARS 38-431.03(A)(3) & (4)to obtain legal advice and to consult with the Town Attorneys concerning the following items: 1. Tucson Water Service Area within the Town of Oro Valley corporate limits. 2. Review of 9th Court Circuit of Appeals decision relating to Charles A. Lathrem and Wayne Bryant vs. Town of Oro Valley 3. (a) The outcome and effect of the decisions of the Arizona Court of Appeals and the Arizona Supreme Court in the case Schmitz v. Cuvelier, Pima County Superior Court No. 328724, Court of Appeals No. 2 CA-CV 98-0223, Supreme Court No. CV-99-0031-PR, (b)the canvass of the FOP Initiative election which was the subject of the Schmitz v. Cuvelier case, and(c)the proposed ordinance which was the subject of the FOP Initiative. 4. The Town's position in response to the motion of Plaintiff/Appellant Wayne Bryant to withdraw and be dismissed as a party in the case Town of Tortolita et al. V. Town of Oro Valley, Arizona Court of Appeals No. 1 CA-CV 99-0022, Pima County Superior Court No. C-328365. Motion carried, 5 —0. Council Member Bryant declared a conflict of interest on Items 2 and 4 and was not present for those portions of the Executive Session. 04/07/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 2 MOTION: A MOTION was made by Council Member LaSala and SECONDED by Vice Mayor Johnson to go out of Executive Session at 7:20 p.m. Motion carried, 5 —0. RESUME REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Paul Loomis, Mayor Dick Johnson, Vice Mayor Paul Parisi, Council Member Fran LaSala, Council Member Wayne Bryant, Council Member PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Loomis led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS Town Manager Chuck Sweet reviewed the upcoming meetings. He also announced that the "kick-off'to the Town's 25th Anniversary Celebration and the Arts and Music Festival will be held on April 17th and 18th at Dennis Weaver Park. Mr. Sweet introduced new staff members Ainsley Reider, Parks and Receation Director; and Terry Vosler, Building Official. Mayor Loomis introduced Dan Dudley, Town Attorney. ORDER OF BUSINESS Mayor Loomis moved"Taking Legal Action from the Executive Session" and item 2 before the Call to Audience. *TAKE LEGAL ACTION AS THE TOWN COUNCIL DEEMS NECESSARY CONCERNING THE EXECUTIVE SESSION ITEMS AS LISTED ABOVE MOTION: Council Member LaSala MOVED to direct staff to proceed as discussed during the Executive Session on Item 4. Vice Mayor Johnson SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 4— 1, with Council Member Bryant abstaining. 2. RESOLUTION NO. (R)99-41 CANVASS OF THE VOTE - FOP LODGE # 53 INITIATIVE, MARCH 9, 1999 SPECIAL/RECALL ELECTION MOTION: Council Member Parisi MOVED to approve Resolution No. (R)99-41. Council Member LaSala SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 —0. 04/07/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 3 CALL TO AUDIENCE Heidi Muma, 11381 N. Twin Spur Court stated that she was new to Oro Valley and had concerns regarding fire service within the Town. She said that she was discouraged to learn that fire service was not provided as a municipal service. She stated that if it were a municipal service, then all residents would be treated equally. Ms. Muma presented a signed petition from area residents requesting that fire services be provided by the Town. g Bill Adler, 10720 N. Eagle Eye Place, stated that he felt strongly about the Town's General Plan. He stated that the Community Design Element(Section 4.9.3) addresses Gateways in major thoroughfares within the Town. He said that the Gateways were to be aesthetically pleasing and well landscaped and expressed his concern that the La Canada Gatewaywas not being maintained and it was an absolute disgrace. He asked that while matters are being negotiated for the maintenance of the area, the Town make the Gateway presentable. Mr. Adler also pointed out that the Community Design policy statement, 9.1.0 references erosion control and that segments of Naranja Road are in violation of that policy. He felt that the Town should take action to correct the problem. 1. CONSENT AGENDA Council Member Bryant asked to pull Consent Agenda Items F, G, and J. MOTION: Vice Mayor Johnson MOVED to approve the Consent Agenda with the exception of Items F, G, and J. Council Member LaSala SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 —0. A. Minutes—3-15-99, 3-17-99 & 3-24-99 B. Police Report—February 1999 C. Resolution No. (R)99-37 Authorizing the Town to contract with Agra Infrastructure, Inc. to prepare plans and specifications for the installation of three traffic signals within the town limits D. Proclamation - Designating the week of May 1 —May 8, 1999 as National Safe Kids Week E. Resolution No. (R)99-38 Authorizing the Oro Valley Police Department to apply to the Governor's Office of Community and Highway Safety for funds to purchase a DUI Enforcement Vehicle and an Aggressive Drive Enforcement Vehicle to further public safety within the boundaries of the Town of Oro Valley F. Resolution No. (R)99-39 Designating Officers to declare Official Intent on Behalf of the Town with respect to reimbursement from proceeds of tax-exempt bonds pursuant to Treasury Regulations Section 1.150.2 (PULLED FOR DISCUSSION) G. Resolution No. (R)99-40 Award of Contract for Project No. 318-310- 903.319 to construct a left turn bay at the intersection of Tangerine Road and La Canada Drive to NAC Construction (PULLED FOR DISCUSSION) 04/07/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 4 H. OV13-97-68 Approval of Sunset Ridge at Rancho Vistoso II (aka Maravilla) Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 10, Parcel M, Entry Monument (Property located west of Rancho Vistoso Blvd. and north of Moore Road) I. OV 12-95-02 Approval of amended assurance agreement between DMI Tangerine, LLC and First American Title Insurance as Trustee of 0V12- 95-02—Coyote Ridge, Lots 1-109 J. Project No. W07-0798—Notice of Completion for Town of Oro Valley Water Utility Water Main Extension(2700 zone) (PULLED FOR DISCUSSION) K. OV12-98-20 St. Mary's MPP, Public Art Proposal F. RESOLUTION NO. (R)99-39 DESIGNATING OFFICERS TO DECLARE OFFICIAL INTENT ON BEHALF OF THE TOWN WITH RESPECT TO REIMBURSEMENT FROM PROCEEDS OF TAX-EXEMPT BONDS PURSUANT TO TREASURY REGULATIONS SECTION 1.150.2 Finance Director David Andrews reported that the Town is working on transferring operation of the Oro Valley Water Improvement District (OVWID) from the Metropolitan Domestic Water Improvement District(MDWID)to the Oro Valley Water Utility. He also stated activities are underway with regard to the new Development Services Building. Mr. Andrews explained that staff is looking at financing the costs of these two projects with Municipal Property Corporation(MPC) bonds which are expected to be sold in June, 1999. He explained that some costs for infrastructure improvements and architectural design have already been incurred and that these costs are currently being paid through the General Fund and the Water Enterprise Fund. In order to be able to reimburse these two funds, Council needs to pass the reimbursement resolution pursuant to Internal Revenue Service guidelines. In answer to a question from Council Member Bryant, Mr. Andrews explained that the Town has ninety (90) days from the date that an improvement cost is incurred to reimburse itself. If the reimbursement resolution was not adopted within that time period, the Town could not reimburse itself after the ninety days. He reported that the total bond amount would be $4,435,000. MOTION: Council Member LaSala MOVED to approve Resolution No. (R)99-39, designating officers to declare official intent on behalf of the Town with respect to reimbursement from proceeds of tax-exempt bonds pursuant to Treasury Regulations Section 1.150-2. Vice Mayor Johnson SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 4—1 with Council Member Bryant opposed. G. RESOLUTION NO. (R)99-40 AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR PROJECT NO. 318-310-903.319 TO CONSTRUCT A LEFT TURN BAY AT THE INTERSECTION OF TANGERINE ROAD AND LA CANADA DRIVE TO NAC CONSTRUCTION 04/07/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 5 Town Engineer Bill Jansen reported that Resolution(R)99-40 would award a constructionp roj ect contract to the low bidder,NAC Construction, for the installation of a left turn bay at Tangerine Road and La Canada Drive. Mr. Jansen stated that the intersection was heavily traveled and with the addition of the Post Office, it is extremely critical from a traffic safety standpoint and for traffic movement that the left turn bay be installed. In answer to a question from Council Member Bryant regarding the U.S. Post Office g help in with road improvements during the development of the new post office, Community Development Director Don Chatfield explained that during the design phase of the Post Office, the Federal Government claimed sovereignty and claimed that they did not need to come through the Town's review process. Mr. Chatfield stated that they did go through the Town's design process out of courtesy to the community. He explained that Public Works worked with the Post Office during the design phase and the Post Office did install off-site improvements along La Canada Drive. MOTION: Council Member Bryant MOVED to approve Resolution No. (R)99-40 subject to the Town Engineer's recommendations. TOWN ENGINEER'S RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Award the Contract to NAC Construction,the lowest responsible bidder, in the amount of$39,098.50. 2. Direct the Town Engineer to prepare a Notice of Award to NAC Construction and transmit said notice along with the Contract Agreement and bond forms for execution. 3. Direct the Town Engineer to issue the Notice to Proceed in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Agreement upon receipt of the executed Contract Agreement. 4. Authorize the Town Engineer to execute Contract Change Orders and/or Supplemental Agreements incidental to the prosecution of work. 5. Direct the Town Clerk to hold the bid bonds from all bidders until such time that a Contract Agreement has been executed. Vice Mayor Johnson SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 —0. J. PROJECT NO. W07-0798—NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR TOWN OF ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY WATER MAIN EXTENSION (2700 ZONE) Water Utility Director David Hook reported that Water Main Project No. W07-0798 is completed. The acceptance of the Notice of Completion by Council will allow staff to close out the project. In answer to a question from Council Member Bryant regarding the initial contract amount of$126,970 verses the final contract amount of$156,289.25, Mr. Hook explained that the difference was brought about by seven change orders that were issued, some of which were initiated by the Town. 04/07/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 6 MOTION: Council Member Parisi MOVED to approve and accept the work done on Project No. W07-0798. Council Member LaSala SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 —0. 3. PUBLIC HEARING—ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-18 AMENDING CHAPTER 11, SECTION 11-3-4 OF THE CODE OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PERTAINING TO SPEED LIMITS - MONTERRA VISTA DRIVE FROM NARANJA DRIVE TO TANGERINE ROAD TO 30 MPH AND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF Town Engineer Bill Jansen reported that Monterra Vista Drive is located approximately one mile east of La Canada Drive and extends from Naranja Drive on the south to Tangerine Road on the north and traverses three subdivisions. He explained that the street was constructed by Pima County prior to Oro Valley's annexation of the area. He stated that presently no speed limit has been set for the street and by Town Code, it automatically defaults to a 25 m.p.h. speed limit. Mr. Jansen explained that the Police Department and the Public Works Department examined the appropriate speed limit using factors from the "Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways". He stated that they are recommending a speed limit of 30 m.p.h. for Monterra Vista Drive. Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. There being no speakers, the public hearing was closed. MOTION: Vice Mayor Johnson MOVED to approve Ordinance No. (0)99-18, establishing a speed limit of 30 miles per hour on portions of Monterra Vista Drive. Council Member LaSala SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 —0. 4. PUBLIC HEARING—ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-19 AMENDING CHAPTER 11, SECTION 11-3-4 OF THE CODE OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PERTAINING TO SPEED LIMITS—PORTION OF WOODBURNE AVENUE BETWEEN ARROWSMITH DRIVE AND RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD TO 25 MPH AND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF Town Engineer Bill Jansen reviewed the Council Communication stating that paving was recently completed on the portion of Woodburne Avenue between Arrowsmith Drive and Rancho Vistoso Boulevard. He explained that the section of Woodburne Avenue which ran to the north had a 35 m.p.h. speed limit which was set when the area was annexed into Oro Valley. Mr. Jansen explained that the new section has a lot of congestion including a park in the area. He explained that the Public Works Department and the Police Department have reviewed the speed limit and talked with area residents. He stated that staff is recommending that the speed limit be changed to 25 m.p.h. on this section of Woodburne Avenue. 04/07/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 7 Council Member LaSala questioned whether it would be better to set the speed limit on all Woodburne Avenue to 25 m.p.h. since there are plans for a school to be built off Woodburne Avenue. Mr. Jansen stated that there would be quite a period of time before the school is built so it would be at the discretion of the Council to change the speed limit in the area now. He explained that when the school is built, Public Works would definitely readdress the speed limit on that section of Woodburne Avenue. Chief Wolff stated that he felt it would not be appropriate to lower the speed limit on Woodburne Avenue in its entirety at this time. In answer to auestion from Mayor Loomis, Town Attorney Dan Dudley stated that if q changes were made to the ordinance, it would have to be re-noticed. Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. There being no speakers, the public hearing was closed. Vice Mayor Johnson stated that the Town needs to be sensitive to speed limits and what fall the roads will bear. He said that speed limits should not be set so that they are artificially low for the situation. MOTION: Council Member LaSala MOVED to approve Ordinance (0)99-19, amending Chapter ter 11, Section 11-3-4i to read"Woodburne Avenue from Moore Road to Arrowsmith Drive: 25 miles per hour. Council Member Parisi SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 —0. 5. RESOLUTION NO. (R)99-42 APPROVING THE REQUEST FROM GREEN TREE ESTATES HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION FOR THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY TO ACCEPT MAINTENANCE OF STREETLIGHTS ON GREEN TREE DRIVE Town Engineer Bill Jansen reported Green Tree Estates Homeowner's Association (HOA) has requested that the Town take over maintenance of eight streetlights along Green Tree Drive. He stated that Green Tree subdivision is along Rancho Vistoso Boulevard near Sun City Vistoso. Mr. Jansen explained that in 1996, the Town assumed the maintenance of the streetlights in Sun City along Rancho Vistoso Boulevard. He stated that Green Tree Estates was not part of the original agreement with Sun City Community Association. Mr. Jansen stated that because of the expense involved in maintaining the street lights, the Green Tree Estates HOA has requested that the Town take over the maintenance of the eight lights. He explained that other than the lights at Sun City, it has been the Town'sp olicy to maintain street lights only at major intersections. Mr. Jansen explained that because the street lights in Green Tree Estates are not at a major intersection and serve the residents within Green Tree Estates, the Department of Public Works does not 04/07/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 8 support the request to assume the maintenance and operation of the street lights within pp q that subdivision. Bill Young, 14020 N. Green Tree Drive, representing the Green Tree Estates HOA, stated that they have been working with the Department of Public Works to initiate the maintenance of the seven street lights in their subdivision of 28 households. He explained that they can not afford the equipment necessary to maintain the lights. He stated that they have minutes from the June, 1996 HOA meeting stating that"the Public Works Department will include Green Tree Drive for maintenance,"but no one can find p the letter from Public Works stating so. Mr. Young requested that Council consider their request for accepting the maintenance of the street lights. Mark Lewis, 11181 N. Copper Butte, Lewis Management Resources, representing the Vistoso Community Association, stated that maintenance of streetlights has been discussed many times and the Vistoso Community Association has also requested that the Town take over the street light maintenance for Rancho Vistoso Boulevard. He stated that it has been the Council's decision in the past to not take over the maintenance of street lights and he asked that the Council be consistent in their decisions. Mr. Lewis g offered to work with the Green Tree Estates HOA and possibly tie their maintenance in with the Vistoso Community Association's regularly scheduled maintenance which could potentially save the Green Tree Estates HOA some costs in maintaining their lights. Vice Mayor Johnson stated that the issue of light maintenance has been discussed several times and he would like to see some resolution on the maintenance of the street lights. He stated that he would like to see some equitable distribution between the HOAs and the Town as everyone in the Town benefits from street lighting. In answer to a question from Council Member Bryant, Mr. Jansen stated that if the Town would accept maintenance of lights for any one of the associations, it would set a precedence and others would be `waiting in line." He also stated that the overall financial impact to the Town would be substantial. Mayor Loomis and Vice Mayor Johnson recommended that staff look into costs associated with maintaining all the street lights and the impact on the Public Works budget. Council Member LaSala stated that one neighborhood association has offered to help another and he felt that government should stay out of the situation. MOTION: Council Member LaSala MOVED to DENY Resolution(R)99-42, a resolution to approve Green Tree Estates Homeowner's Association request for the Town of Oro Valley to accept maintenance of streetlights on Green Tree Drive. Council Member Parisi SECONDED the motion. DISCUSSION: Council Member Parisi stated that he had no problem with the Town maintaining the lights if the residents were willing to pay for it. Residents would have to 04/07/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 9 realize that thesetyp es of maintenance would cost money and he would like to see Oro Valley remain free of property tax. Vice Mayor Johnson stated that he would like to see staff collect facts and then come back to Council. AMENDMENT TO MOTION: Direct staff to gather data on how much is spent on street light maintenance and bring those figures back to Council when time permits. (Council Member LaSala and Council Member Parisi agreed to the amendment.) Motion as amended carried, 4— 1, with Council Member Bryant opposed. 6. PUBLIC HEARING—ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-20 TRANSLATING THE ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY SUBURBAN RANCH (SR) TO ORO VALLEY R1-144 FOR THE PROPERTIES KNOWN AS MAP 3 "WESTERN ANNEXATION" (PROPERTIES LOCATED NORTH OF LAMBERT LANE APPROXIMATELY 1/4 MILE SOUTH OF NARANJA DRIVE,EAST OF SHANNON ROAD, AND WEST OF LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD) Community Development Director Don Chatfield reported that on August 5, 1998, the Town annexed 455 acres known as Map#3. He explained that under Arizona Revised Statutes the Town is required to translate the zoning on the annexed properties from Pima County zoning designation to the closest Oro Valley zoning designation. Dr. Chatfield reviewed an overhead presentation showing the area which is located north of Lambert Lane, approximately 'A mile south of Naranja Drive, east of Shannon Road, and west of La Cholla Boulevard. He explained that under State Statutes the Town would be translating Pima County's SR(Suburban Ranch) zoning to Oro Valley's R1- 144, Single Family Residential zoning. Dr. Chatfiled stated that prior to the annexation, there was no pre-annexation agreement negotiated between the property owners and the Town. Dr. Chatfield further reported that the R1-144 zoning designation is of the same or lower intensity than the designations laid out in the General Plan Land Use Map, therefore,the ro osed translations are in conformance with the General Plan. Dr. Chatfield stated that proposed p the Planning and Zoning Commision voted to recommend approval of the translation of zoning for Map#3 on March 2, 1999. He stated that planning staff also recommends approval. Council Member Bryant referred to a letter he received from Attorney Bill Risner stating that the Ninth District Court of Appeals has ruled that the case he (Mr. Bryant) is involved in with the Town of Tortolita verses the Town of Oro Valley has been resolved. Council Member Bryant stated that he, therefore, feels he has no conflict of interest and is capable to vote on this item. 04/07/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 10 In answer to aq uestion from Council Member Bryant concerning the item not being voted on until April, Town Attorney Dan Dudley stated that there is no current Arizona case law that defines what would happen in such a situation. He stated that he felt there would be greater risk involved in not voting on the translational zoning. Dr. Chatfield explained that if Council would defer action, the property would essentially be without zoning until such time that the translational zoning was executed. Town Attorney Dudley concurred. In answer to a question from Council Member LaSala, Dr. Chatfield clarified that the R1- 144 zoning is the closest comparable zone to Pima County's SR district. He explained that there may be some differences in setbacks, but the intensity and use of the properties are virtually identical. Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. Christina, McVie, 4420 W Cortaro Farms, representing the Coalition for Sonoran Desert Protection, expressed concerns regarding the potential for up-zonings, building permits, and land use decisions in federally proposed critical habitat. She stated that these were grave concerns of the Coalition and asked for the Council's careful consideration of any zoning that might be less restrictive and may promote habitat degradation. Ms. McVie stated that the Coalition's concerns relate to Agenda Items 6, 7, and 8. Barbara Smith, 13600 N. Como Drive, stated that she understands having to place the translational zoning in a specific amount of time, but she wished the Town of Oro Valley would have waited to annex the properties until after the Courts had made their final decisions. She asked the Council to refrain from further action on rezonings and the granting of Conditional Use Permits and building permits until the issues are decided on by the Courts. Ms. Smith stated that her concerns relate to Agenda Items 6, 7, and 8. Louis Benson, 2590 W. Tortolita Hills Trail, stated that the land that Oro Valley is attempting to rezone is in the Town of Tortolita. He stated that Tortolita was legally created on September 2, 1997 under a law that was found constitutional by a Judge. He stated that he feels Oro Valley's behavior is aggressive towards Tortolita. He recommended that Oro Valley do away with the current annexations. He stated that under Arizona law, it is illegal for one bona fide entity to annex parts of another legal bona fide entity. He asked the Town Attorney to verify. Mayor Loomis closed the public hearing. MOTION: Council Member Bryant MOVED to continue Agenda Items 6 and 7 until further notice to legal action as to which direction to proceed. Motion FAILED due to lack of second. In answer to a question from Council Member LaSala, Prosecuting Attorney Tobin Sidles reminded Council of all the paperwork that has come forward. He stated that one item 04/07/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 11 includes a decision by the Arizona Court of Appeals, Division One, that clearly states that no incorporation which has occurred according to this law is legal or valid. He stated that the Court of Appeals sits higher than the Superior Court Judge, and the Town of Oro Valley is relying on the language from the Court of Appeals. Council Member LaSala asked what if the Town of Oro Valley approves the translational zoning and the Tortolita is ruled to exist. Mr. Sidles explained that no one has ever been in such a position. He stated that(as speculation) if Tortolita is found to exist, they would need to develop their own General Plan and place zoning on the property. Mr. Sidles stated that there is a provision in the United States Constitution regarding vested rights. He explained that once an owner has started development on a particular piece of property, it can not be taken away. He explained that if construction has already been started,then the property owners would have a constitutional argument. In answer to a question from Council Member Bryant regarding costs incurred by the Town such as rezoning, police service, etc., Mr. Sidles explained that there are always costs incurred from providing such services. He stated that the biggest liability would be in not providing the services after the areas are annexed. Mr. Sidles stated that the Town of Oro Valley could not be assessed attorney fees for any lawsuit it is not a party to. Council Member Parisi confirmed that as part of his Oath of Office, he has to do what is best for the Oro Valley citizens. MOTION: Vice Mayor Johnson MOVED to recommend approval of the zoning translation for Map 3, from Pima County SR to Oro Valley R1-144 and all applicable development standards of the R1-144 zoning district. Council Member LaSala SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 4— 1, with Council Member Bryant opposed. 7. PUBLIC HEARING—ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-21 OV9-99-28 PARCEL 224-20-002B, CASAS ADOBES BAPTIST CHURCH, TRANSLATING THE ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY SUBURBAN RANCH (SR) TO ORO VALLEY R1-144 WITH CONDITIONS, AND REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH (PROPERTY LOCATED WITH ANNEXATION MAP 3 - WEST AND ADJACENT TO CANADA HILLS B & C) Community Development Director Don Chatfield reported that on August 5, 1998 the Town of Oro Valley annexed a parcel owned by the Casas Adobes Baptist Church. The Town is required to translate the zoning on the property from Pima County SR zoning to Oro Valley's closest equivalent, R1-144. He explained that Pima County SR zoning not only allows single family residential but also permits church uses. The Casas Adobes Church had an approved development plan through Pima County and is currently amending their development through the Town of Oro Valley process. 04/07/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 12 Dr. Chatfield explained that the General Plan Land Use designation for this parcel is Public/Semi Public which complies with the existing use and the approved development plan. He said that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the translational zoning on March 2, 1999 and staff concurs with the recommendation. In answer to questions from Council Member LaSala, Dr. Chatfield stated that the church currently operates a school on their site which was permitted under Pima County zoning. He stated that the school use would continue with the property as well as the worship and Christian activities associated with the church. Dr. Chatfield also explained that the General Plan does support the use of a school in this area. In answer to a question from Council Member LaSala, Warren Thompson, Cella Barr Associates, representing the applicant, stated that a Conditional Use Permit(CUP) was required by Pima County for the school. He explained that the CUP was received for the school and the day care center that are currently operating on the site. In answer to a question from Council Member LaSala, Dr. Chatfield stated that the CUP's that were granted by Pima County are not subject to review by Oro Valley as they are land use entitlements that have been granted (school and day care facilities.) Dr. Chatfield stated that the structures are already in place on the campus and that the zoning as provided by the County is vested. Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. Alan Lathrem, 1750 W. Tangerine Road, recommended that the Casas Adobes Baptist Church work with Pima County and not Oro Valley. Ken Smith, 13600 N. Como Drive, stated that Mr. Sidles referred to a ruling by the Court of Appeals but ignored the fact that the same court ruled that they had not directed the dis-incorporation of Tortolita. Mayor Loomis closed the public hearing. In answer to a question from Council Member LaSala, Mr. Sidles explained that the reason this issue is in litigation is that there are always two legitimate view points. He explained that the situation is if the translational zoning is not placed, the property is not zoned and someone could build anything they wanted to. He explained that at this time, the Town is in litigation and there are risks involved and we want to minimize those risks as much as possible. MOTION: Vice Mayor Johnson MOVED to approve Ordinance (0)99-21, OV9-99-28, translating zoning for Parcel #224-20-002B in the area known as La Cholla/ Tangerine, from Pima County SR to Oro Valley R1-144, and all applicable development standards of the R1-144 zoning district, and the entitlements attached as Exhibit"A." A) 1. This property has an existing development plan under Pima County. 04/07/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 13 2. Any additions or amendments to the development plan must be built under Oro Valley standards. Council Member Parisi SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 3 —2, with Council Member Bryant opposing and Council Member LaSala abstaining. Mayor Loomis called a recess at 8:50 p.m. Meeting resumed at 9:05 p.m. 8. PUBLIC HEARING—ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-22 OV8-99-2 COPPER MOUNTAIN ASSEMBLY OF GOD REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ESTABLISH A COMMUNITY SERVICE AGENCY FOR SPRINGBOARD, A TEMPORARY SHELTER FOR ABUSED,ADOLESCENT WOMEN (PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE COPPER MOUNTAIN ASSEMBLY OF GOD, ON THE NORTH SIDE OF TANGERINE ROAD,APPROXIMATELY Y4 MILE WEST OF LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD) Community Development Director Don Chatfield stated that the Copper Mountain Assembly of God has requested a continuance of Ordinance No. (0)99-22 until the May 5, 1999 Council meeting stating they would like more time to address some of the surrounding citizens concerns regarding the police reports from the existing Springboard facility. Dr. Chatfield reviewed a map depicting the location of the facility and the criteria for consideration of a Conditional Use Permit(CUP.) Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. The following people spoke in favor of approval of the Conditional Use Permit by the Copper Mountain Assembly of God request for the Springboard facility: William Seale, 1161 W. Eureka, Pastor-Copper Mountain Assembly of God Church Paul Jaffe, 1019 W. Prince Bill Adler, 10720 N. Eagle Eye Place Mark Stone, 4274 N. Howe Place Steven Thomas, 11760 N Rain Rock Way Jackie Thomas, 11760 N. Rain Rock Way John Patla, 1005 W. Wheatridge Reverend Snow Peabody, 698 E. Wetmore Donald Nehs, 4950 S. Jeanette Ave. Drue Burleson, 1280 E.E1 Conquistador Way Darlene Edwards, 11891 N. Mandarin Lane Lana Herre, 1779 W. Wimbledon Way Stan Sifers, 444 W. Orange Grove#423 Sharlene Nehs, 4950 S. Jeanette Ave. Janet Stone, 4274 N. Howe Place Kristina Sifers, 444 W. Orange Grove #423 Kathie Baker, 4200 E. Benson Highway Chris Morand, 270 S. Stone 04/07/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 14 Ronald Tatman, 1010 W. San Miguel Circle Barbara Tatman, 1010 W. San Miguel Circle Keith Setilmeyer, 3950 W. Potvin Kirk Hunt, 12428 N. Mesquite Crest Way The following people spoke in opposition of the approval of the Conditional Use Permit by the Copper Mountain Assembly of God request for the Springboard facility: Dorita Brady, 1885 W. Limewood Drive Andra Ewton, P.O. Box 1901, Tucson Larry Klingler, 12151 N. Como Barbara Craig, 2600 W. Limewood Claire Klingler, 12151 N. Como Jake Kendrick ,12250 N. Camino del Plata Patty Edkins-Tedy , 1775 W. Tenner Alan Lathrem, 1750 W. Tangerine stated that he did not know about this issue before tonight's meeting. He recommended that the noticing and communication with surrounding residents be better. Mayor Loomis closed the public hearing. In answer to a question from Council Member LaSala regarding General Plan compliance, Dr. Chatfield explained that the General Plan Sector Board encouraged development of this property with a rural residential character. He explained that is why during the translational zoning it was recommended that the grading be limited to 30% of the site. He stated that this is much less than the residential properties in that area have been graded. Dr. Chatfield stated that while the proposed use is not a residential one, the low impact of the activities should not be in conflict with the rural character of the area. Dr. Chatfield further explained that regardless of who annexed the area, the property came from Pima County and has always had the right to build non-residential uses. He stated that we are dealing with prior zoning entitlements and the Town is trying to make the best fit with the property entitlements that existed before the Town's General Plan Policy was made. Given the entitlements and the due process rights that came with the property, a Conditional Use Permit can be approved without an amendment to the General Plan. Vice Mayor Johnson stated that whether the Springboard facility came to Oro Valley, it would still exist. He stated that he also felt that it should be a win-win situation for those people who wanted to be annexed into Oro Valley, but it was a very difficult decision for the Council. He stated that the process is complex and emotional and it is time for the Springboard people and the neighbors to step back and honestly and candidly discuss the issues. He ur ed the Council to continue the item with the proviso that the parties meet before May 5th. 04/07/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 15 MOTION: Vice Mayor Johnson MOVED to CONTINUE this issue with the proviso that the applicant and the neighbors get together and if they wish, someone from staff to sit in or a Council Member, and see what combinations there are, if any, and then come back to the Council on May 5th. Council Member LaSala SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 —0. Mayor Loomis stated that Council would address Agenda Items 13 and 14 after Item 9. Mayor Loomis called a recess at 10:43 p.m. The meeting resumed at 10:52 p.m. 9. RESOLUTION NO. (R)99-43 A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY ENCOURAGING THE INCORPORATION OF THE CASAS ADOBES AREA OF UNINCORPORATED PIMA COUNTY Town Manager Chuck Sweet reviewed an overhead map of the Casas Adobes area. He explained that Resolution(R)99-43 supports the incorporation of the Village of Casas Adobes under the existing laws. Mr. Sweet reviewed some minor recommended revisions to the proposed resolution. Pete Tescione, 4471 W, Meggan Place, read a letter to Oro Valley Council Mayor and Council Members from Members of the Casas Adobes Council dated April 5, 1999. He then reviewed his recommended revisions to the proposed resolution. Mike Schuh, 1431 W. Maximilian Place, stated that he felt the Town of Oro Valley should remain neutral and to not take sides. He urged the Council to vote no on the proposed resolution. Ken Smith, 13600 N. Como Drive, reviewed Tortolita's process for incorporation and stated that there is no resolution supporting the incorporation of Tortolita. He stated that it is clear that the majority of the citizens of Tortolita want to be a town. He felt that Oro Valley should be willing to cooperate with all its neighbors. Jane Madden, Vice Mayor of Casas Adobes, stated that Representative Huffman has not met with Casas Adobes citizens or council although he has been invited. She stated that Casas Adobes would wait out the court ruling and see what happens from there. Michael Kramer, 10455 N. Gila Road, stated that the Town of Oro Valley needs to look at people's feelings and consider what they are doing. He asked for support for Tortolita. Discussion followed regarding supporting the towns' incorporations, changes in the state legislation and being good neighbors. MOTION: Vice Mayor Johnson MOVED to pass Resolution No. (R)99-43 with the deletion of Item 2 in the "Now, Therefore, Be it Resolved" section, with a resolution to come before Council at a later date supporting the Town of Tortolita. Council Member Parisi SECONDED the motion. 04/07/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 16 DISCUSSION: Council Member Parisi suggested that the Council not pass the resolution and have another meeting inviting Casas Adobes and Tortolita to discuss the issue. Motion failed 2—3, with Council Members Parisi, Bryant, and LaSala opposed. MOTION: Council Member Parisi MOVED to have another meeting and have discussion and possible action on giving permission to Tortolita and Casas Adobes to become towns under the present laws. Council Member Bryant SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 4— 1, with Vice Mayor Johnson opposed. 13. OV12-99-3 RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 10J,THE INN AT VISTOSO DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD AND VISTOSO HIGHLANDS DRIVE) Community Development Director Don Chatfield reported that a Planned Area Development (PAD) amendment was approved by Council on March 17, 1999 allowing a reduction in parking and an increase in building height at specific locations on the site. He stated the Development Review Board reviewed the development plan on March 16, 1999 and recommended approval. Staff evaluated the Inn at Vistoso Development Plan against the General Plan Land Use Policies and found the project to be in conformance and therefore, recommend approval. Dr. Chatfield recommended amendments to the conditions listed in Exhibit"A" by amending Condition 1 by adding"if warranted by an appropriate traffic study"to the first sentence and changing "issuance of a grading permit"to "issuance of a certificate of occupancy." Charles Hulsey, The WLB Group, representing the applicant stated that they would have no objections to the amendments to the conditions. Penny Wolfswinkel, Southwest Properties, reviewed the new hotel property stating that it would have 232 units, a spa facility and 15,000 square feet of meeting space with ballrooms and boardrooms. Dave Harkinson, Radisson Hotels Worldwide, Minneapolis, Minnesota, presented slides on the background of Carlson Company (the parent company) and Radisson. MOTION: Vice Mayor Johnson MOVED to approve OV 12-99-3, Rancho Vistoso 10J, the Inn at Vistoso Development Plan, as recommended by the Development Review Board, subject to the conditions in Exhibit"A" as amended. A) 1. The applicant shall contribute fair share funds to the cost of future signalization of the Rancho Vistoso Boulevard/Vistoso Highlands Drive intersection if warranted by an appropriate traffic study. This fair share shall be 04/07/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 17 based on the percentage of total traffic this project will contribute to this intersection. Details concerning the collection and holding of these funds shall be worked out at a future date prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. 2. Correct the number of compact parking spaces in note #4. Council Member Parisi SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 —0. 14. OV12-99-3 RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 10J,THE INN AT VISTOSO LANDSCAPE PLAN (PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD AND VISTOSO HIGHLANDS DRIVE) Community Development Director Don Chatfield reported that the Development Review Board at their March 16, 1999 meeting voted to recommend approval of the Landscape Plan for the Inn at Vistoso. He explained that the applicant has proposed to use a number of plants not listed on either the Oro Valley or the Arizona Department of Water Resources approved plant lists, but these plants are to be used in specialty "oasis"type settings. Dr. Chatfield stated that the required fact sheets on the plants have been submitted, and staff can support the use of these plants under the provisions of the Zoning Code. Dr. Chatfield stated that he is recommending the approval of one additional condition, Condition 4 stating "All exterior lighting to be low pressure sodium per the Outdoor Lighting Code." In answer to a question from Council Member Bryant, Dr. Chatfield explained that the majority of the site will be in native vegetation. The other plants will be placed around the pool areas, etc. and their fact sheets show them to be low allergen producers. He explained that a large part of the site would be undisturbed. Charles Hulsey, The WLB Group, representing the applicant, stated that they would need to get approval of the low sodium lighting from the Radisson. Dr. Chatfield confirmed that if the Radisson would not accept the low sodium lighting, they could come back before Council requesting an amendment to the Landscape Plan. MOTION: Vice Mayor Johnson MOVED to approve the OV 12-99-3, Rancho Vistoso 10.1, the Inn at Vistoso Landscape Plan, as recommended by the Development Review Board, subject to the conditions in Exhibit"A" and subject to the requirement of low pressure sodium lighting being added. Applicant can return for an amendment to the Landscape Plan if the lighting is not approved. 1. Elevations and layout of entry features must be submitted for Town Council approval. 04/07/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 18 2. Palm trees whose mature height may reasonably be expected to exceed 25 feet are prohibited under the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised. A PAD amendment or variance will be required for use of such trees on this project. 3. Oasis areas must be specified on the landscape plan. 4. All exterior lighting to be low pressure sodium per the Outdoor Lighting Code. Council Member Bryant SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 —0. Mayor Loomis moved Agenda Item 15 and 16 to follow Item 14. 15. OV12-98-12 CANADA CROSSROADS DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A PROPOSED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONALLY ZONED C-N (PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LAMBERT LANE AND LA CANADA DRIVE) Community Development Director Don Chatfield reported that the Development Plan being submitted for Canada Crossroads has some minor amendments but substantially conforms to the Tentative Development Plan that was submitted as part of the rezoning of the property. He stated that the building sizes have been reduced to 3 8,15 0 square feet in response to grading concerns. Dr. Chatfield stated that a meeting was held on March 23, 1999 to review the proposed development changes with the affected neighbors. Dr. Chatfield explained that the project is in compliance with the General Plan Land Use Map as well as applicable commercial and economic development policies. He stated that staff recommends approval of the Development Plan with the conditions listed in Exhibit"A" with one additional condition. Condition 6 would read "The south entry to the buildings shall be restricted to employee use only," (Building #3 on the plan.) Jerry Roberts, 10280 N. Camino Valdeflores, stated that the neighbors met with the property owners,the developer and the Town's Senior Planner, Valerie Feuer. He stated the neighbors expressed their concerns and the owner and developer were very cooperative. He stated that the neighbors were in support of the amended development plan. Bill Adler, 10720 N. Eagle Eye Place, expressed his concerns with an entry into the development off of Lambert Lane. He stated that he did not believe that the economic success of this development hinged off an entry off Lambert Lane before Lambert Lane is widened and extended. Don Laidlaw, Laidlaw Consulting, developer of the project, stated that much discussion has taken place on the Lambert Lane entry. He stated that it has been determined that with the existing pavement, having traffic enter off Lambert Lane poses very little risk. He explained that it is limited to a right turn entry only and that further turning movements at the intersection would only be considered at a later date when all the safety 04/07/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 19 improvements to Lambert Lane have been made. Mr. Laidlaw thanked Mr. and Mrs.Jerry Roberts for their determination and help on the project. Discussion followed regarding safety devices, barriers, deceleration lanes, etc. In answer questions from Mayor Loomis, Dr. Chatfield stated that the final configuration addressing the traffic barriers, etc., would be made at the improvement plan stage when the improvement plans are reviewed by the Public Works Department and the Planning and Zoning Division. In answer to a question from Council Member LaSala, Fire Chief Fink, 3535 E. Hawser, stated that as a general statement, an ingress and an egress are desirable. He stated that he did not see a problem with the design as presented. MOTION: Vice Mayor Johnson MOVED to approve OV 12-98-12, Canada Crossroads Development Plan subject to the conditions in Exhibit"A" with the addition of Condition 6 as recommended by staff. A) 1. Architecture shall be compatible in theme and color palette with other existing structures at the intersection as required by the rezoning. 2. All permanent signs shall be of consistent color, size and style and are encouraged to be consistent with the sign theme at other corners of the intersection 3. The public art must be submitted to the Arts Advisory Board Subcommittee and Town Council simultaneously with submittal of architecture to the Development Review Board. 4. Development plans will be required for individual buildings if there is any change to the building footprint, parking, or circulation. 5. Any lighting in the south parking area shall be low level and directed away from residences. Lighting must be shown on the development plan and can be administratively reviewed and approved. 6. The south entry to the buildings shall be restricted to employee use only. Council Member LaSala SECONDED the motion. Council Member LaSala complimented the developer and neighbors on working together. In answer to a question from Council Member LaSala, Dr. Chatfield directed Council's attention to the first page of the Development Plan, Item#19 which specifically states that"The access onto Lambert Lane will be limited to a deceleration lane and a right turn in only until the proposed improvements to Lambert Lane have been completed by the Town of Oro Valley." He stated that he did not feel there were any real safety concerns as a staff of engineers and consultants have studied the issue. CALL FOR THE QUESTION: Motion carried, 5 —0. 04/07/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 20 16. OV12-98-12 CANADA CROSSROADS LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR A PROPOSED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONALLY ZONED C-N (PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LAMBERT LANE AND LA CANADA DRIVE) Community Development Director Don Chatfield reported that the Landscape Plan for Canada Crossroads is in full compliance with the General Plan and the Zoning Code Revised and staff stands with the Development Review Board in recommending Council approval. MOTION: Vice Mayor Johnson MOVED to approve OV 12-98-12, the Canada Crossroads Landscape Plan as recommended. Council Member Bryant SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 —0. Mayor Loomis recessed the meeting at 12:05 a.m. The meeting resumed at 12:12 a.m. Mayor Loomis stated that the order of the remaining of the meeting would be Items 10, 18, 11, 12, and 17. 10. PUBLIC HEARING—ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-23 OV8-99-1 MIRAGE HOMES REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR SHORT-TERM RENTALS IN THE RANCHO VISTOSO PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT—BUILDINGS 1 —8 AND COMMON ELEMENTS OF VISTOSO GOLF CASITAS II, (PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTH OF VISTOSO HIGHLANDS DRIVE,WEST OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD Community Development Director Don Chatfield reported that Mirage Homes has requested a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for Vistoso Golf Casitas II. He stated that three similar Conditional Use Permit(CUP) applications have been approved in the past by the Council. Dr. Chatfield stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission and staff recommend approval of the CUP with conditions. He also recommended approval of an additional condition: "Operation of this facility shall apply to Section 8A-444 of the Town of Oro Valley Sales Tax Code relating to the 2% sales tax and Section 8A-447 relating to the additional 1%bed tax." Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. There being no speakers, the public hearing was closed. MOTION: Vice Mayor Johnson MOVED to approve Ordinance (0)99-23, OV8-99-1, Vistoso Golf Casitas II Short-Term Rental Conditional Use Permit with the conditions listed in Exhibit"A" including the additional condition as read by Dr. Chatfield. A) 1. Complete disclosure of current and future rentals must be released, in writing, to all prospective home buyers. 04/07/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 21 2. The minimum length of rental time shall be limited to three (3) nights, and overnight rentals shall be prohibited. 3. A complete on-site, full-time management company shall be involved with the rental units, ensuring maintenance, not eliminating the owners' rights to contract elsewhere, if they so desire. 4. Future timeshare of units shall be prohibited. 5. Rental signage will only be allowed on site and must conform to the Oro Valley Sign Code and the Rancho Vistoso PAD. 6. Violation of any of the above conditions may result in a citation, or revocation of the conditional use permit. 7. Operation of this facility shall apply to Section 8A-444 of the Town of Oro Valley Sales Tax Code relating to the 2% sales tax and Section 8A-447 relating to the additional 1% bed tax. Council Member Parisi SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 —0. 18. EXTENDING THE TERMS OF THE FIRE ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBERS Town Manager Chuck Sweet stated that this request is to extend the terms of the Fire Advisory Committee to July 31, 1999 (terms to expire at the end of May, 1999.) He explained that the Committee is currently working on the Strategic Plan for Fire and Emergency Services for the Town and the extension of time would give them time to complete the Plan. Council Member Parisi stated that as liaison to the Fire Advisory Committee he would recommend leaving the terms open ended to allow the Committee sufficient time to complete their task. Herb Rutt, 160 E. Carolwood, member of the Fire Advisory Committee, stated the Committee is anxious to conclude the Plan. He stated that he feels the time limit is arbitrary and defeats the purpose. He stated that there are issues beyond their control and he recommended that Council approve the extension of the Committee's terms to at least 60—90 days beyond the completion of the report. In answer to a question from Council Member Bryant, Mr. Sweet stated that the consultants have estimated that the report should be completed by the end of May or the first of June. MOTION: Council Member LaSala MOVED to extend the terms of the Fire Advisory Committee until such time as the report is received and Council takes action on the Strategic Plan at which time the Committee's terms will expire. Council Member Parisi SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 —0. 04/07/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 22 11. OV12-98-21 VISTOSO GOLF CASITAS II, FINAL PLAT, RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 11, PARCEL AJ (PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTH OF VISTOSO HIGHLANDS DRIVE AND WEST OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD) Community Development Director Don Chatfield reported that Council approved a preliminary plat for Neighborhood 11, Parcel AJ on February 3, 1999. He stated that the Final Plat complies with the requirements of the Zoning Code Revised and staff recommends approval. In answer to a question from Council Member Bryant, Dr. Chatfield explained that plat is not in conformance with the medium-density residential land use designation of the General Plan, however,the proposed development is permitted by the existing zoning. Mayor Loomis asked to add that the recreational requirements will be satisfied through the shared use of Vistoso Golf Casitas I. In answer to a question from Council Member Bryant regarding potential flooding from Highlands Drive, Town Engineer Bill Jansen stated that Exhibit "A", Condition 2 requires a final drainage report to be submitted. MOTION: Vice Mayor Johnson MOVED to approve OV 12-98-21, Vistoso Golf Casitas II, Final Plat, Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 11, Parcel AJ, effective on the date of satisfaction of conditions listed in Exhibit"A" with the additional condition regarding the recreational requirements being shared with Vistoso Golf Casitas I. A) 1. Vistoso Highlands Drive shall be labeled as a Public Street. 2. The final drainage report shall be submitted which shall address the final design of the street section C-C and drainage channel section B-B. The report shall include a detailed section through the sediment basin. The Table of 100 year Post- Development Peak Discharges shall be revised to include Concentration Point 5. The report shall also address the erosive nature of the earthen channel carrying flows to the retention basin. The report shall include the updated Summary of Retention Credits available within Neighborhoods 10 and 11. 3. A recorded agreement between the owners of the golf course and the owner of this site with regard to construction and maintenance of the drainage basin, drain pipes, drainage channels, other drainage structures and cut/fill slopes that occur on golf course property shall be provided prior to the recordation of the final plat. 4. The recreational requirements will be satisfied through the shared use of Vistoso Golf Casitas I. Council Member Parisi SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 3 - 2, with Council Member LaSala and Council Member Bryant opposed. 04/07/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 23 12. OV12-98-21 VISTOSO GOLF CASITAS II,LANDSCAPE PLAN RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 11, PARCEL AJ(PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTH OF VISTOSO HIGHLANDS DRIVE AND WEST OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD) Community Development Director Don Chatfield reported that the applicant has more than satisfied the open space requirement, providing 1.82 acres of open space and landscaped area, or 55.1%of the site. He stated that the developers of Vistoso Golf Casitas II have proposed a passive recreation area in the northwest corner of the site. Dr. Chatfield also reported that at their March 9, 1999 meeting, the Development Review Board voted to recommend approval. Staff also recommends approval of the Landscape Plan for Vistoso Golf Casitas II with the following general note being added: "The recreation requirements for this development are met through the provision of a passive recreation area on site, and the use of the active recreation facilities located within the adjacent Vistoso Golf Casitas I development." MOTION: Vice Mayor Johnson MOVED to approve OV 12-98-21 Vistoso Golf Casitas II Landscape Plan, with the recommended staff condition. CONDITION: The recreation requirements for this development are met through the provision of a passive recreation area on site, and the use of the active recreation facilities located within the adjacent Vistoso Golf Casitas I development. Council Member Parisi SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 —0. 17. OV12-98-18 SIGMA TECHNOLOGIES EXPANSION, DEVELOPMENT PLAN, (PROPERTY LOCATED ON LOT 1 OF THE FOOTHILLS BUSINESS PARK,WEST OF THE ALLIED SIGNAL BUILDING) Community Development Director Don Chatfield reported that Sigma Technologies is located in the Foothills Business Park and are proposing to expand their facilities by 5,000 square feet. The maximum total building coverage allowed under the La Reserve Planned Area Development (PAD) is 33%with the actual building coverage with the expansion being 20%. Dr. Chatfield stated that the expansion development plan complies with Policy 9.1A of the General Plan. The Development Review Board recommended approval of the proposed expansion at their January 12, 1999 meeting. He stated that staff also recommends approval as it meets the Zoning Code Revised requirements and complies with the General Plan. MOTION: Council Member Parisi MOVED to approve OV 12-98-18 Sigma Technologies Expansion Development Plan. Council Member LaSala SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 —0. 04/07/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 24 TOWN MANAGER'S REPORT No report. ENGINEER'S REPORT No report. FINANCE DIRECTOR'S REPORT No report. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S REPORT No report. POLICE CHIEF'S REPORT No report. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS Council Member Parisi reported that he and Town Manager Chuck Sweet and Human Resources Director Jeff Grant met with the Fraternal Order of Police (FOP) regarding Town Policy and recognition of the FOP. He stated that this item should come to Council on April 21, 1999. Vice Mayor Johnson reported that the Solid Waste Task Force has been working on their report for the past three months and have completed their task. CALL TO AUDIENCE No speakers. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Council Member Bryant MOVED to adjourn at 12:30 a.m. Council Member LaSala SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 —0. Respectfully submitted, \ � i Roxana Garrity, Deputy Town Clerk 04/07/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 25 I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the regular session of the Town of Oro Valley Council of Oro Valley, Arizona held on the 7th day of April, 1999. I further certify that the meeting was duly called and held and that a quorum was present. Dated this day of , 1999. Kathryn E. Cuvelier, CMC A Di"' AFT MINUTES OF THE ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL SPECIAL SESSION ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11,000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE APRIL 12, 1999 CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 p.m. PRESENT: Paul Loomis, Mayor Francis LaSala, Council Member Wayne Bryant, Council Member EXCUSED: Dick Johnson, Vice Mayor Paul Parisi, Council Member 1. PUBLIC HEARING—ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-24 STEWART TITLE AND TRUST PROPERTY (AKA CHAPARRAL HEIGHTS), TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY CR-1 TO ORO VALLEY R1-20,WITH CONDITIONS (LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LAMBERT LANE AND LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD) Robert C. Stubbs, representing the applicant. Mr. Stubbs stated this is a translational zoning, translating from Pima County CR-1 to Oro Valley R1-20 limited to 150 units per acre. He stated the Planning & Zoning Commission's recommendations that the minimum lot size should be 24,000 square feet rather than the 20,000 square feet permitted in the R1-20, is in conflict with the pre-annexation agreement. He pointed out that the height in CR-1 is 34 feet, the height in R1-20 is 18 feet. He asked that the Town Council adopt the ordinance with R1-20 limited to 150 units per acre as bound by the pre- annexation agreement. Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. Alan Lathram, 1750 W. Tangerine Road. Mr. Lathram asked about the requirement of preserving the ironwood trees in the area. Dr. Chatfield explained the process the Town follows to preserve vegetation. Mr. Lathram voiced his opposition to the translational zonings scheduled for adoption this evening and pointed out that these are all within the Town of Tortolita. Barbara Smith, 13600 N. Como Drive. Mrs. Smith voiced her opposition to all of the translational zonings scheduled for adoption this evening and distributed the most recent ruling issued by the Arizona Court of Appeals and dated 11-24-98. She stated that since 04-12-99 Minutes, Council Special Session 2 the Town of Tortolita was not disincorporated by the Arizona Court of Appeals, the annexations voted on are in the Town of Tortolita. Bill Adler, 10720 N. Eagle Eye Place. Mr. Adler objected to the Town entering into a pre-annexation agreement that does not meet the Town's General Plan. Steve Shocat, 1795 W. Hunter Road. Mr. Shocat stated the importance of honoring the restrictions that Pima County placed on the parcel on the corner of La Cholla/Lambert Lane. He stated there was concern about losing the owl habitat, saguaros and ironwood trees. He pointed out that ironwood trees are hard to transplant. Mayor Loomis closed the public hearing. Council Member LaSala stated if we don't translate this zoning, the developers can attempt to build anything they want on that property. A MOTION was made by Council Member LaSala. MOTION SECONDED by Mayor Loomis to adopt Ordinance No. (0)99-24 from Pima County CR-1 to Oro Valley R1-20 and all applicable development standards of the R1-20 zoning district with the conditions listed in(0)99-24 and the pre-annexation agreement dated 4-9-98; and that Section 7 of (0)99-24 shall be removed. In response to a question by Mayor Loomis, Dr. Chatfield explained that in the pre- annexation agreement it states "that the developer shall preserve in place, relocate or mitigate significant onsite cacti and trees, including ironwood trees as recommended by the preservation plan as approved by the Town." He explained that Oro Valley was the first jurisdiction in this area to require native plant preservations plans. He explained that registered landscape architects are required to survey the site for significant native vegetation and then a preservation plan is developed. He stated that if a significant tree or cacti is in jeopardy because of development, mitigation is required in the form of movement or replacement. He agreed that ironwood trees are difficult to transplant and staff's direction is to maintain as many as possible, but he pointed out that there are 2 healthy transplanted ironwood trees at the entrance to the Town Hall. In response to a question by Council Member Bryant regarding his right to vote on the translational zonings, Town Attorney Tobin Sidles replied that since he has not seen any paperwork, he does not know if Mr. Bryant has been withdrawn or not from the lawsuit MOTION carried 2— 1 with Council Member Bryant opposed. 2. PUBLIC HEARING—ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-25 OV9-99-52 PARCEL 224-39- 0020 FUTURE ARIZONA INC. PROPERTY, TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY SR TO ORO VALLEY R1-144 WITH CONDITIONS (LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LAMBERT LANE AND LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD) Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. 04-12-99 Minutes, Council Special Session 3 Barbara Smith, 13600 N. Como Drive. Mrs. Smith stated that if the developers have not filed the proper paperwork with Pima County before they start building, she will file a complaint. She asked that this comment apply to each translational zoning listed on this evening's agenda. Mayor Loomis closed the public hearing. Council Member LaSala MOVED to approve Ordinance No. (0)99-25, OV9-99-52 translating zoning of Parcel# 224-39-0020, the Future Arizona Inc. Property, from Pima County SR to Oro Valley R1-144 and all applicable development standards of the R1-144 zoning district with the conditions listed in (0)99-25. MOTION SECONDED by Mayor Loomis. MOTION carried 2— 1 with Council Member Bryant opposed. 3. PUBLIC HEARING—ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-26 OV9-99-110 PARCEL #224- 11-0480 WHEELER PROPERTY, TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY CR-1 TO ORO VALLEY R1-20 (LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SHANNON ROAD AND NARANJA DRIVE Don Chatfield, Community Development Director stated that it is recommended that this property be translated to R1-36 instead of R1-20. Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. There being no additional comments, the public hearing was closed. Council Member La Sala MOVED to approve Ordinance No. (0)99-26, OV9-99-110, translating zoning of Parcel #224-11-0480, the Wheeler property, from Pima County CR- 1 to Oro Valley R1-36, and all applicable development standards of the R1-36 zoning district, with the conditions listed in(0)99-26. MOTION SECONDED by Mayor Loomis. MOTION carried 2— 1 with Council Member Bryant opposed. 4. PUBLIC HEARING—ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-27 OV9-99-106 PARCEL #224- 11-046E SMITH PROPERTY,TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY SR TO ORO VALLEY R1-144, WITH ADDITIONAL HORSE ENTITLEMENTS (LOCATED EAST OF SHANNON ROAD AND NORTH NARANJA DRIVE Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. There being no additional comments, the public hearing was closed. A MOTION was made by Council Member LaSala to approve Ordinance No. (0)99-27, OV9-99-106, translating zoning of Parcel#224-11-046E, the Smith property, from Pima County SR to Oro Valley R1-144, all applicable development standards of the R1-144 zoning district, with the conditions listed in (0)99-27. MOTION SECONDED by Mayor Loomis. MOTION carried 2— 1 with Council Member Bryant opposed. 04-12-99 Minutes, Council Special Session 4 5. PUBLIC HEARING—ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-28 0V9-99-5 & OV9-99-6 TLC INVESTMENT GROUP PROPERTIES,LA CHOLLA/TANGERINE MAP, TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY SR TO ORO VALLEY R1- 144 Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. There being no additional comments, the public hearing was closed. Council Member LaSala MOVED to approve Ordinance No. (0)99-28 for parcel #219- 46-0200 in the area known as La Cholla/Tangerine, from Pima County SR to Oro Valley R1-144 and all applicable developments standards of the R1-144 zoning district. MOTION SECONDED by Mayor Loomis. MOTION carried 2— 1 with Council Member Bryant opposed. 6. PUBLIC HEARING—ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-29 OV9-99-53 & OV9-99-109, MAP 2,TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY SR TO ORO VALLEY R1-144 Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. There being no additional comments, the public hearing was closed. Council Member LaSala MOVED to approve Ordinance No. (0)99-29 translating zoning from Pima County SR to Oro Valley R1-144 and all applicable development standards of the R1-144 zoning district, excluding the 3 public school parcels and public school entitlements. MOTION SECONDED by Mayor Loomis. MOTION carried 2 — 1 with Council Member Bryant opposed. 7. PUBLIC HEARING—ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-30 OV9-99-107 AND OV9-99- 108 PARCEL#224-11-046B AND#224-11-046C STENSTROM PROPERTIES, AND OV9-99-95 PARCEL #224-11-0500 COFFINGER PROPERTY, TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY SR TO ORO VALLEY R1- 144, WITH ADDITIONAL HORSE ENTITLEMENTS (LOCATED EAST OF SHANNON ROAD, AND NORTH OF NARANJA DRIVE) Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. There being no additional comments, the public hearing was closed. Council Member LaSala MOVED to approve Ordinance No. (0)99-30, OV9-99-107 and OV9-99-108, translating zoning of Parcel#224-11-046B and#224-11-046C, the Stenstrom properties, and OV9-99-95, translating zoning of Parcel #224-11-0500, the Coffinger properties, from Pima County SR to Oro Valley Ri-144 and all applicable development standards of the R1-144 zoning district, with the conditions listed in(0)99- 30, general plan does support the equestrian lifestyle which retains the character of the town. MOTION SECONDED by Mayor Loomis. In response to a question by Mayor Loomis, Dr. Chatfield replied that in Oro Valley R1-144 it allows for 1 horse for 30,000 04-12-99 Minutes, Council Special Session 5 square feet. In Pima County SR it allows for 1 horse per 10,000 square feet. MOTION carried 2— 1 with Council Member Bryant opposed. 8. PUBLIC HEARING—ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-31 OV9-99-74, OV9-99-75 & 0V9-99-103 PARCELS 224-11-0300,224-11-0310 & 224-21-0010 AMPHITHEATER PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPERTIES, TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY SR TO ORO VALLEY R1- 144,WITH PUBLIC SCHOOL ENTITLEMENTS (LOCATED WEST OF VISTA DEL SOL,NORTH OF GLOVER ROAD AND SOUTH OF TANGERINE ROAD) Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. There being no additional comments, the public hearing was closed. Council Member LaSala MOVED to approve Ordinance No. (0)99-31, OV9-99-74, OV9-99-75 and OV9-99-103,translating zoning of parcels#224-11-0300, #224-11-0310 and#224-21-0010, the Amphitheater Public School District properties, from Pima County SR to Oro Valley R1-144, all applicable development standards of the R1-144 zoning district, and public school entitlements stated in(0)99-31. MOTION SECONDED by Mayor Loomis. MOTION carried 2 — 1 with Council Member Bryant opposed. 9. PUBLIC HEARING—ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-32 OV9-99-67 & OV9-99-68, H. BRAUN AND O.R. BRAUN PROPERTY—MAP 2 TRANSLATION OF ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY SR TO ORO VALLEY R1-144 WITH CHURCH AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ENTITLEMENTS Discussion followed regarding the proposed uses for this property. Council Member LaSala requested an opinion from the Town Attorney regarding county entitlements carrying over to Oro Valley during the translational zoning process. Town Attorney Dudley read the statutory requirement for translational zoning and stated he would like to research the underlying due process concerns. Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. Barbara Smith, 13600 N. Como Drive. Mrs. Smith stated that this property is directly in the flight path of the La Cholla Air Park. Louie Benson, 2590 W. Tortolita. Mr. Benson stated this property is in the territory of Tortolita and he doesn't understand why Oro Valley continues to annex into Tortolita. He stated he prefers open space and asked no action be taken within the territory of Tortolita. Hector Conde, 14040 N. Lobelia. Mr. Conde stated based on his research of the statutes when a developer translates from county to town zoning, he loses those entitlements. 04-12-99 Minutes, Council Special Session 6 Mayor Loomis closed the public hearing. MOTION: Council Member LaSala MOVED to continue this item to May 5, 1999 and direct staff to check into the flight pattern of the airport and direct legal staff to look into issues discussed tonight. MOTION seconded by Mayor Loomis. MOTION carried 3 —0. 10. PUBLIC HEARING—THE HALLAQ PROPERTIES FROM PIMA COUNTY CB-1, TR AND CR-2 TO ORO VALLEY C-1,R-6 AND R1-10 (LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LAMBERT LANE AND LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD Dr. Chatfield requested a continuance of this item until such time as the Planning & Zoning Commission has heard this item and made a recommendation. Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. There being no additional comments, the public hearing was closed. MOTION: Council Member LaSala moved to continue OV9-99-51, translating zoning of Parcel #224-24-0120 and Parcel #224-24-0130, the Hallaq properties, from Pima County CB-1, TR, and CR-2 to Oro Valley C-1, R-6 and R1-10. MOTION seconded by Council Member Bryant. MOTION carried 3 —0. ADJOURNMENT Council Member LaSala MOVED to adjourn the meeting at 8:30 p.m. MOTION seconded by Council Member Bryant. MOTION carried 3 —0. Respectfully submitted, Kathryn E. Cuvelier, CMC Town Clerk I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the meeting of the Town Council of Oro Valley, Arizona held on the 12th day of April 1999. I further certify that the meeting was duly called and held and that a quorum was present. Dated this 26th day of April 1999. Kathryn E. Cuvelier, CMC Town Clerk B CD 00 V)N N N d' O r-- N 444 M ON W Z O CT CD kr)O \O O o0 t� .-� 00 VO to O d= t7' `O �t C N tr)N to P. vp 00 69 N69 m bq 00 H w U 6A 69 69 69 W � � 4� 00 'C N M O 00 N N x �O �, M a LO O O M ON en Q� 00 'C O Tr \C) 69 0 O N O �O M �D a) 00 00 W ^ ^ 00 • QrJ N (-q-c. M M O e N 44 U 'p M 'O 6A N H • W .. o O N tv., .a. ^ •--a U Ca. N N .I- N O oo O O O CN 0 a) 00 kr) O kr) N 69 69 Nt' = oo try \D M en M 69 ^ t� 00 " WI N N • Q j �p 69 64 6N 49 49 69 E"' O C4 Ci 69 Z G4 w W ›'' cn N N CrN N —. O O ^. N N G.; C/) Z !, d O a, C.. c:a Q N M M O O LO t� O O O t� en >" N en M 00 en O 44 VI b+4 M `D O en ..._; ej 64 o0 N N O �" C G'� CA U N 64 00 69 44 ' LWT. a G\ y 69 69 69 44 < � � Z o . > vl N N to N — .-4 O O O N E- V 00 LO N C— N ,-; > 4' ! s.. r-", 2 0.) a. • V CC v, N r o0 00 O oo N O O oo - 'O >,,, U r1' \D ^" O N N 69 69 N C' N W C 69 N 'O N 'O N O0 ^ r--^ a c!, Nct W — M 69 44 44 .:1- ...I a) .4 69 69 64 64x H C 4► Z `O \O . I-- 00 O O tet' N C' '400 `O • C' oo ' �t 69 64 M 00 N CO oo C\ 00 t1 .7r 00 N 0 H O oho 'C N N 0O Z en O ^ 69 GO 69 6R W ms 00 6NA N N Ce > 496969 U OT OT \O Nci) N O O M to O enN N E U a ,--:. ,—.. ., vi CA cin ,4 cic a) O C4 E - x a C...' 2 a4 U U ba) Z � � oO o W ..1 � a Z UQ - Q H a� O ^ to N w E 5 ° 0 0 � c24 §b � �' = 9c4 E � E c 0 0 LI. au L.L. o .— W o a) W c"Fa c re �v c H a c0 C� Q 2 0 cG ... U +� 0 Z 0 FA C� cn Q •cn � t H C7 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: May 5, 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL FROM: Jim Hossley, Roads & Drainage Operations Supervisor SUBJECT: Award of contract for Project No. 101-310-623-99/1 1999 Slurry/Crack Seal & Reconstruction Program SUMMARY: The project involves applying approximately 16,750 square yards of slurry seal in the Canyon Shadows Subdivision. Additionally, it involves applying approximately 64,460 linear feet of crack seal in the Canyon Shadows, Pusch Ridge Estates, portions of Rancho Catalina, portions of Shadow Mountain Estates and portions of Sun City Vistoso Subdivisions. Also a part of this project is to saw cut & replace approximately 828 square yards of pavement on Silverton Avenue at Copperstone in Sun City Vistoso. The purpose of this project is to maintain and improve the road surfaces in the above mentioned subdivisions. In response to the advertisement for bids the Town received two bid proposals. The bid proposals were opened by Town staff at 2:00 p.m. on Monday April 12, 1999. The following is a summary of the bids received: 1 Southern Arizona Paving and Construction $45,978.20 2 Sunland, Inc. $57,117.22 ATTACHMENTS: Exhibits "A"-"E" Maps of Areas Covered by This Contract Minutes from bid opening Copy of Bid Schedule - Southern Arizona Paving and Construction Copy of Bid Schedule - Sunland, Inc. FISCAL IMPACT: Funding for this project is available from budgeted Town funds for the 98/99 fiscal year. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 2 RECOMMENDATIONS: 1 . Award the Contract to Southern Arizona Paving and Construction, the lowest responsible bidder, in the amount of$45,978.20. 2 . Direct the Town Engineer to prepare a Notice of Award to Southern Arizona Paving and Construction, and transmit said Notice along with the Contract Agreement and bond forms for execution. 3 . Direct the Town Engineer to issue the Notice to Proceed in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Agreement upon receipt of the executed Contract Agreement. 4 . Authorize the Town Engineer to execute Contract Change Orders and/or Supplemental Agreements incidental to the prosecution of work. 5 . Direct the Town Clerk to hold the bid bonds from all bidders until such time that a Contract Agreement has been executed. SUGGESTED MOTION: The Council may wish to consider one of the following motions: I move to approve the award of contract to Southern Arizona Paving and Construction subject to the Town Engineers recommendations. OR I move to deny the award of contract to Southern Arizona Paving and Construction. (1)Willi. . Janse' P. Town Engineer Chuck Sweet, Town Manager :0 ' PROJECT NO. 101-310-623-9911 if 1: SLURRYICRACK SEAQ & RECONSTRUCTION PRCGA'J1 . . 1999 • EXHIBIT "A" • •.. .t ... J J 1CANYON SHADOWS SUBDIVISION •, 40 i '" . • • • . • • . . • • • . • , . . . • ... • • .• • . . • , . Ar • • • . . . .1 . • _ . • • ... .;: ., IN • . .,,, • - • -• • • 1... a....T4‘.:.‘1:'04rr--7 • L..C.6.1 .1::... . • . i ) .:.-• tl., j • f • • • . .. . . tal\••. . • -77, . , N . - • • - • -. : . . • 4,:-. . 1.. . . .... : - p . • • . . • • . %. J`.;... . i . .• •••. • tea► •• ' -• • •• ' . • • • . . . ..• , • - r -- • • - - - . ..- . 4 • • - . • • • • . g• • • • ..--: • . .... , :. , • • • -..- . .. •• . •. . • • . • • ,....: • , . • • • • • • • • A.,-; • • • - . ., • • •.. • - . • - - . . • • • • • • • . .. . . ... ... •... •• . . . . . . . . . . . .. • . _ . . • . • . . • • fx:7, •• • • • ..._.,... -•,:•,• ..,..,. • • . .. • . . • ... . . • . • • ,..-- .4. . • . . . • . - . • - • .:,-.,- lit • • • • .. • _ - .. • .' • .•-. t C - , . • • • • . ...„, . I •• . • ' '..• 4Z3 .- • • • • • .. . • . . • • . . • ,,, . -,p - Iv 1?40- 1 - . . - : • • „.. • • . •-. r.. I 0..,,,,?•-a•••••:.:;•.-:.,..= • •.. • . . ” . ' .C, ,..... .4.,. • • -. tii,19-7...,.t.--:-.- ," :: ' .:., 6 • . .A 1:07_,,,,,- ..ickit...,:• Fa Ger • : -•: . ?Li:IC.4e •e...ti.„:::-.' i-.1 7 s,7,..:,-; . 6.* • t • • . . •• (DAl< 0.----;...,....._:-.,:•• . • • . • _ • 7 • .„.-.., • .,1%4 ..,,•••-,,- ...1,40 • . . .. • . • •. . ,, ,•,. • - -•. .. slkPit- .tws-rt4 ,cfm,z- • • • • • • • • • • • • - -�O_ _; ...., ... i . _ PROJECT NO. 101-310-623-9911 ..6 .. 1999 SLURRY/CRACK SEAL & RECONSTRUCTION PRCGRM • -.1 :.: • _1 , EXHIBIT "B" - . •_s- .. • PUSCH RIDGE ESTATES SUBDIVISION •y° 'VK • -•••-• •.:-.,-- i. • • • - • . i' . •• . .....-i •. ; .. .... . •. • .4) '' •• . 49 .: • . : . '• • • • . . ,....7---:- - .. ' . .....-Q, ...• p - Ar:-PL • 4 ..max • ••• : ::-'. : • ` z ..''• i . , - ,•••.• t,e4. •._., _.,....7, a/fit: ..:• • . •.. - • :. , . --..:... , ? - • . • :..-• • . • -- . • •- • • • • •-• ... fiz, ..• .....: , .--. . ... • • -.: -•-4-- • -•- ---t4 - . - •. . ....-:::,,, -'- ... :. " .-- • . •;.•..• ..... ,...f, •-•,::: *, -V- ...)- • .d. --. '..- 4?-1;5 •: . P .. .,,--- . . it..f..t-; %•. '‘ • - ,,. _.• '.. •'{'� tet • • . °•• -. : •• • . . 4°9" .••.:...;....;......................."'"'!'"'""""7"'"N"....•.1,..S,.....E..4:.,.:!••::,,...,,r.:e:..41,.::::,:.....:::.•• ......:: • •A .- -r -- --- . • ...• • • .. ... . - • - - . -...... ... . ... - < . • . .'.1 ., -- -•-• •• .• • . . . .. . . . . . . • •. ... .. • . - .- . • - • • • .• . • •...• . • • •• . . •, . . .. .• . • •. .•. . .. .... . . ..• • . . . .. . • .,.....,..,. 1 • •. ., - . -• - . . .• . • .... . . ...... • .. • • • •• .••• • . . • •• .. .. .. .• . . • • ..... . ..•.. . . . . . • • -,..k. t . :• . • .. •• •• • .. • . . ..,• •• . • . ..., . .... .•.. . ..•• . ..„.. 1 . •.•. .. .. .. .. • . ... • . . • • • • ti -•.• • • •:'• • • . • . '. . • •ti .• • •••• • '•-: • - - - - •. .• •. • • •7? .,.., - tea. • • '• - A • • .. 7_ `fix '� � . .. ▪ • . . • • . . • -• • • • . - . • • • . . • • • , . , -71'. .. . --. -- . : . . PROJECT NO, 101-310-623-9911 ., _ .-., 1999 SLtJRRY!CRACK SEAL & RECONSTRUCTION PROGRAM iii., • %••. . . • . ...., - . EXHIBIT "C" ..:: :•-• 1 . . • . . . , - . s ,i • . . • RANCHO CATALINA SUBDIVISION • ..•. •. C elf'. 1,N9.- CCA/C-0 l'el, C.,',. •• • • • • • • . .•. .) • •,.7• . ••': • • :;:j.:H. •Ej • t ..89 • �'._+ • it ° • • t • • f • . , • . l •. • • , • • 1' 1 . . • ; ••V.• .- : :...*• .•. .: . - • 'f.. 0 . • . •,..`c i •••••- • . .a..kt• ,_ 14 • . •-p 6..A...:.: • . • • . • • '• tf • . • . •" : •••• . • . . C a . --.. • •• 1 ,.: • . • . • . • . . . .• . . . . . _._... , . . • s• ... . • • . . • . . . . . •• . . • .... . .. • (., . . . • • ... ihe, •. -. -. - • . . ,. , . . • • .• . _ . . • • • • .• .. . • • • ... • . • • . . . . ..-:•• •••: • . • . . • . • .. . . • • • • •• • • - . ... . . . • • i „ . .. • • • • - :4 '. •.• , . .. . .. • • . • .. . . . .. •• • :•.• . .:. •... • •• :. _, ..:.,.i.„-- -....s.„•••••..„.......... .• . . • • . • • • • -• . . •• •• viiN..!•0-_-- - riatr.40 . • • .. • • • . • .. _..,..,..-- 34::, . . • . • •• ••-•--2 L., • _ .. • • .. • • . • . ' .; ... . - • 'CI P°. . „i4P!P •• l • • . .,,.. . • . . • . • • . , • •• . .. •• • •• -- • •• ,--:- . . . • . • ... . . • . •. . • • . ... v..,...±.....„.,,,,, . . : . ,,%.,,, -••• -:. - • - •- • - • >: �‘,--: ' . • . -- - • -• • - . • fr•.. - if • • •• -._. 1.srizt.ft . _ r` - • 1— _:, . . i • ' • . . . . PROJECT NO. 101410-623-9911 ., _, It) . ssRECONSTRUCTION POG M ��� S� ��i? ���91j('ice�i� SEAL � .. .......:, : . : EXHIBIT "D" - . . . . - --_i . _ :: ! . -_...._i . . . SHADOW MOUNTAIN ESTATES SUBDIVISION - • • / .- • . . .• ,.. \\e. r',.._ c 1.,,.. c...4,..1...c\ Ix, ..• . . . - - . . . . „ i . • C.......--- . . • ___ _ _ . _ _ ., __ ,._. . . . . . • ... .:. . . . . • . . . . . ,-.., - t . . • ., ., • • .::. . . . . -,:- ....i - - • . . . . e 40% . . . • .:-..1 -. i . • . . .. . • .. ..... .. • .... • 10" ....... . . .... .14.1. .. . • • .• .." • • . -,.- • . .•. • • • • • Af '.• .• • • • • • • T4t- 1 - fr frz" -- .. 'gr- • • *••• - • f • • • • � • •, . • _. . . ..-;-- • •1 .• • . . . . • •• • . •.„ gift--'. • pis, • • • • . . .. .• ,.... • • .„ . . . • tr. . . • • . • . . . .. . . • •.• • ,, . . . • . . . -. 4.4Ni -. .-- g -_ .A. - •-. . • . . • • • • ••. •• fir. - • • •• - • •• _73_ ..kipp.-- . . . M • • • . PROJECT NO. . .. ...... , 1999 SLURRY/CRACK SEAL &RECONSTRUCTCN PROGRAM • . . EXHIBIT "E" . , . ..:. ,.x . • SUN CITY VISTOSO SUBDIVISION ...:4 .. . • • • .• . . . .. . . . . . ... . . . ..„. . t • • fil • \ - • Vis' * t : •h • • �J • '11 ... • • - • N - - . . •.. . • .. . .... ,• •, . .. . a A 1 • • , + • • ti • , .. t �' : . � • • . 4.is .• . 6• . .•. • • • . . • . . • . • .•.„„.. . . , . • • . • .. • . .. . • . . . . :. . . . . . •. . t . . ,,..:' 't•••• ••: •• •• - •• --. it- . .• • . ••• -• •• -.• - .,cr- .....„•,-,.. - • • . • :.44 • J. — • 4 Cld rirtft0D ' •• • ' ... • .. • . . . • i • , .. • . • . . . . sik...a.. ... ..• . ..',),. :.Carr;vb::a.,.... /1126-•-•...... ....:..... .).. .. • • is :. • • • • • • • 4 • . A � . • - TOWN OF ORO VALLEY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: • FILE ���JIM HOSSLEY,ROAD AND DRAINAGE SUPERVISOR ` SLTBJECTi BID OPENING MINUTES APRIL 12,1999-PROJECT NO.101-310-623-99/1 DATE: APRIL 20,1999 At approximately 2:03 PM April 12, 1999 the bid opening for project no. 101-310-623-99/1, 1999 Slurry/Crack Seal&Reconstruction Program, commenced. The location of the bid opening was in the Administration Conference Room at Town Hall, 11000 N.La Canada in Oro Valley. Attendees of the bid opening were Linda Hersha,Clerk's Office; Debbie Bailey, Southern Arizona Paving and Construction; and Jim Hossley, Department of Public Works. Jim began the bid opening. Linda announced the name of the contractors submitting bids and opened each contractor's bid package. Jim then reviewed the documents in the bid package to determine apparent completeness of the package. Linda then read the bid amount aloud. Jim announced the name of the contractor with the apparent low bid. The bid opening then dosed. There were two bidders on the subject project. The bidders were Southern Arizona Paving and Construction—the apparent low bidder,and Sunland,Inc. IP ili BID SCHEDULE PROJECT NO, 101-310-623-9911 IP _, ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION OF EST. UNIT OF UNIT TOTAL ITEMS QUANT. MEAS, PRICE 1 Apply Crack Seal in Accordance 64,460 L.F. 3 U1 4 5, .-W' 11 With the Contract Documents, Special Provisions, and The State Standard Specifications, 111 Complete R 2 16,750 Place Slurry Seal Coat S.Y. \,C)c) krolien, Application in Accordance 1lVith ii. the Contract Documents, Special 1.1 Provisions, and The Standard Specifications, Complete p p II 1 ::t- 3 Sawcut And Replace Asphalt in S.Y. a- in \.,d.‘b- --I --,.!. __,, Accordance With the Contract 828 L Special Provisions, p te and The Standard ;X ; Specifications, Complete A 1111 4 Traffic Control in Accordance 1 each Lumpc-� -' b;gym, ri , ,tom -� with the Contract, Documents, Sum C(,: Special Provisions, and--the Standard Specifications, 1 Complete I! ,i NI , 1 o AMOUNT IN NUMBERS: $ (-4rN nTOTAL B[Ds.-r'\Oj i. BID AMOUNT IN WORDS: -- \�, �I Jcc� TOTAL ` IT\ G' N. --CO:VL- RECEIPT OF ADDENDA NO(S). Tr) IS HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGED. 4,,,).,-;j0,--,,( Cu\) III -10- 111 BID SCHEDULE PROJECT NO. 101-310-623-9911 111 ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION OF EST.-- UNIT OF UNIT TOTAL ITEMS QUANT. MEAS. PRICE 1/1 1 Apply Crack Seal in Accordance 64,460 I-•F. $.42 27,073.20 11111 With the Contract Documents, Special Provisions, and The State Standard Specifications, Complete 2 Place Slurry Seal Coat $:91 16,750 S.Y. 15,242.50 Application in Accordance With the Contract Documents, Special Provisions, and The Standard Specifications, Complete 3 Sawcut And Replace Asphalt in S.Y. 15.34 12,701.52 Accordance With the Contract 828 $ Documents, Special Provisions, —11101- and The Standard Specifications, Complete 4 �. Traffic Control in Accordance 1 each $ with the Contract, Documents, Lump Sum 2,100 2.,100.00 _ Special Provisions, and the Standard Specifications, Complete . ate 1111 Y y r TOTAL BID AMOUNT IN NUMBERS: $ 57,117.22 TOTAL BID AMOUNT IN WORDS: Fifty Seven Thousand One Hundred Seventeen and 22/100 Doll RECEIPT OF ADDENDA NO(S). None IS HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGED. NOW 111 -10- TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: May 5, 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Dennis Silva, Jr., Planner I SUBJECT: OV12-99-1 VILLAGES OF LA CANADA PRELIMINARY PLAT, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF CONGRESSIONAL WAY AND NORTH LA CANADA DRIVE BACKGROUND: The WLB Group, representing Kaufman and Broad, request DRB approval for a preliminary plat for the Villages of La Canada. The downzoning for this property was recently approved by the Town Council on March 17, 1999. This downzoning allows for development of 80 single-family homes on lots of approximately 7,200 square feet. It is located northeast corner of La Canada Drive and Congressional Way. The Rancho Feliz subdivision is located to the west across La Canada Drive, and to the north is a vacant land. The property will be accessed via Congressional Way. SUMMARY: The proposed preliminary plat illustrates 80 single-family residential lots designed with a similar lot size as he adjacent existing Villages of La Canada. The proposed plat will be accessed from Congressional Way and consists of a 55' buffer area along the western boundary. The western boundary will include a Bufferyard D and part of the recreation area, which links to the main recreation area at the southwest corner of the proposed plat. A 16' Bufferyard D is located along the northern boundary of the development. The 16' Bufferyard D also runs along the eastern property boundary of this development. A 20' pedestrian access common area between lots 20 and 21 is implemented which will provide a linkage between the proposed residential development and future commercial development to the north. Sidewalks will be implemented when La Canada Drive is widened. Staff is requesting that the applicant pay an in-lieu fee since they will not include sidewalks in this plan. The property development standards for the proposed plat are as follows: the setbacks are front—20', side— 5', and rear — 5'. The existing zoning is PAD High Density Residential with a conditional zoning of Medium Density Residential. The maximum permitted building height for this subdivision is 25' two (2) stories. TRAFFIC: A draft traffic impact analysis report has been submitted. The proposed site is a single-family housing development that will generate a total of 844 calculated trips per day. The site had been approved for an apartment complex generating 1,794 calculated trips per day. The traffic will be able to disperse in a such a way that it will not have a significant impact on La Canada Drive providing the following recommendations from the traffic Engineer are implemented: • Minor widening around the guard station is needed for a 150-foot queuing length for left turning vehicles on Congressional Way into La Canada Drive. • Restripe La Canada Drive to make a 16-foot refuge lane for left-turning vehicles. This refuge lane should be TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 3 the entire length between Congressional Way and Sonora Drive. • Place a 12- foot wide 100-foot long minimum right turn deceleration lane with a minimum 100-foot taper length on La Canada Drive approaching Congressional Way from the south. • Raise the elevation of Congressional Way to be equivalent with La Cafiada for 30 feet back for sight distances purpose. • Prepare for signalization by the year 2010. DRAINAGE: This project site generally drains from north to south with onsite generated stormwater runoff entering Congressional Way and the soil-cement to the east with both flows ultimately reaching the CDO Wash. This project is affected by 326-cfs from vacant land at the north property line. This offsite runoff will be diverted into the soil-cement channel along the east property line through an earthen channel on the northern boundary of the property. The earthen channel will be lined with a soil erosion blanket, covered with a thin layer of topsoil and hydroseed. The channel will be irrigated to ensure vegetative growth. The onsite-generated runoff will be collected by slotted drain at three onsite locations and conveyed into the soil-cement channel. Only 37cfs will be discharged into Congressional Way, which is a better situation than pre-developed condition. GRADING: A grading waiver was approved in 1994 by DRB with the following conditions: All cut slopes shall be benched every eight(8) feet,providing a three (3) foot bench. 2. All cut slopes shall be undulating to match the natural terrain. 3. Slopes shall not exceed 3:1, nor shall slopes require jute mat, grouted riprap, or mechanical means to hold slopes in place. The grading waiver is still valid. Engineering staff has reviewed the preliminary plat and grading plan and finds them consistent with the grading waiver. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD ACTION: The preliminary plat for the subject parcel in the Villages of La Cafiada PAD was recommended approval by a 5— 0 vote on April 13, 1999. GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE: The proposed preliminary plat complies with Policy 1.2A of the General Plan, encouraging that the location of residential neighborhoods are close to activity centers to minimize travel times. The proposed plat will be located next to future neighborhood commercial development which will promote pedestrian linkages between the uses. RECOMMENDATION: Staff finds that the proposed preliminary plat complies with the Villages of La Canada PAD and the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised and recommends approval, subject to those conditions listed in Exhibit"A". SUGGESTED MOTION: The Council may wish to consider one of the following motions: IsmTOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 3 of 3 I move to approve OV 12-99-1 Villages of La Canada Block A Preliminary Plat, effective on the date of satisfaction of attached conditions listed in Exhibit A, attached herewith. OR I move to approve OV 12-99-1 Villages of La Canada Block A Preliminary Plat, effective on the date of satisfaction of attached conditions listed in Exhibit A, attached herewith and the following added conditions: OR I move to deny OV12-99-1 Villages of La Canada Block A Preliminary Plat, finding that: Attachments: 1. Exhibit A—Conditions for Approval 2. Reduced Copy of Preliminary Plat l , ; '`"� ' : ing7 Zoning Ad inistrator 1 . i. r ' • t L . 1 ., ,. „.. Co . unity De pment D ector K.2 -/h,,,„,0--- Town Manager F:\ov\ov12\1999\0V12-99-1\PPTC.RPT EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL OV12-99-01 VILLAGES OF LA CANADA BLOCK A PRELIMINARY PLAT 1. Add a note to the general note stating that the proposed earthen channel will be irrigated to ensure vegetative growth and state who is going to maintain the channel. 2. A hydraulic analysis shall be provided for the 90-degree channel confluence with the existing soil-cement channel. 3. All off-site grading and construction of the drainage channel shall require a written permission from the adjacent property owner. 4. The applicant's engineer shall ensure that vertical and horizontal street design meets the Town of Oro Valley Subdivision Street Standards. 5. Two copies of lot boundary closures calculations are required. 6. The applicant's engineer shall ensure all boundary survey bearings and distances shown on the plan are consistent with the title report. 7. Address to where the carryover flows from concentration points 1.1, 2.1 and 2.3 will be discharged. 8. Call out the existing Qioo just north of cross-section 5. 9. The discharge used for rating cross-section 1 through 4 shall include flows from lots 22-33 as well as flows from concentration point 2 and from the earthen channel. 10. The gutter longitudinal slopes for slotted storm drain calculations shall be revised to match the street profile. 11. A revised drainage report is required, which shall address all drainage conditions. 12. The ponding depth for the flows at the concentration point 2.1 shall be revised so as not to exceed the required 6"per the floodplain ordinance. 13. Drainage report calls for a 24" slotted storm drain at concentration point 1.1, but the plat calls out for 30"pipe. Correct where necessary. 14. Lines 13 and 20 of page 11 of the drainage report shall be revised to reflect no carryover flows from concentration points 1.1 and 2.3 being discharged into Congressional way. 15. Call out right of way width for Tee Up Way. 16. Dimension the entrance right of way width leading from Congressional Way into Sand Trap Way. 17. The traffic report shall address internal traffic flows and conflicts especially at the intersection of the proposed streets and Congressional Way. 18. Traffic counts shall be performed at the intersection of Congressional Way and La Canada in order to determine the AM and PM turning movements for peak hours. 19. All recommendations from the Traffic Engineer shall be addressed. 20. A Traffic Engineer licensed in the State of Arizona shall seal the traffic impact report. 21. A final traffic impact report is required. 22. Provide rating calculations and Hec-ras/Hec-2 backwater analysis calculations for the existing 5 cell 10' x 4' RCBC at congressional Way. 23. The above comments shall be addressed prior to submitting grading & improvement plans for review and prior to scheduling the final plat for Town Council meeting. 24. The applicant must pay an in-lieu fee for sidewalks along La Canada Drive. f 9 � w N Scam N � � pe v o V, !4-) u N !� "' � . ' !o .i a N a u , o cn o o!a o v oe u a u n� - o P° N ' F. �+ > A !IT z AZ �' 29r°�� ry�A AAO � �2 >m �m 2ulv�> _ JTr �TAz-8 HP' c!:P v�/1ito5$� 1! 4 !OM! P ;{ Fv OA F' 6 A 'S IA q mil �nm>«pg ,m�3 C O i0 rfil A ri y w >L hic:, C x N O S� > > �+ �� Z =op rs'iiiA>r i-�• >r > � ri � v > h C Cf p dip o 1•. O�9m...cf -iAA Am9 rn 6� G taA �jyr� i�jpO ` O �� �MCG7JlpZ M 2 y <�i�j 2' Qj f�i �+i {(,�, y� V-71 y1y- Av� !. 7, OAAO ; i njA'Ni+��rm•-• S� � oUNS�i 9„3; m ;y 4171 ZA �j = v O, > A �`�i i O2> ,y 699 O' ;; y2 �A A M > rz lq Nrsf2 A; 3`-z > _ �� . i>F p n < �rsi'S `" v, + 'F < _�� �(�r�f A4 Am>i"-iirrii rz 1 > oz c cL4f � � S3 �, zo Fi > z AA > Z 2SZ(c''ff CmWri o1(51; cZ,�Ui WO A = r �`(+><1 fr�ni m> QO C A> x N > �O F<O � .'1-Q o A -� T �j O oZmCi m E� ZN , ` A .o m 2 < 4>R ,3 �i^' PI _ A L '9 Act m .I mT' Or, z „,r, mm til �f+t>-i>f'1 VI LT �A ; 1 r Q Cm�i Ss 1 N Ul .�.'N�N U p m� -i = Q ] m S AmA yC5�� A �oo=A' OZ Ar�A O ''j < D 2 v>� (,1 C =a < s� -� Zm �i y ... O i`ri `.• $^ Nv`� �1'O `R mvA=� 1A 1 D > A5 r .[ �AF z N = (+) ( A>� O V m Z C [•"' `A Z r v Z = Ui y i >,A., it T > 9A z 9 F m S 29 4 6A^ �, (n m���oa �m�~Ac��mm p,. � i3; F n� �� (� � Cr� ig �'A� Tz�{ � �r�At•i� � � to �, 6 � � mQ�?�� A+'- m� o A� `� � zm�i oA >> i._i 4 A > C.` Z L �� D Z ,24 t/i r� --i� Z��Ap \r � y� o S� -i �iry�nii oZ RZ Ag > p C 132:22 'An-.1:�Ai,,AA �p ��Ayipp A Y m px 2 $2 F 6 OS iA , >rm0N N N'''c§§ N N N $ . N m 43 2A> -O O A-i >2 r A Dp'^_O Z-_C rAi1.m V1y1Ae; =m A2A O m mN Z� DZ A A m >, �m m6 0 mA w 00 .m. X §. gF GqR rp 1 p> O ' >2.$,1 KIP Z�OOA . D S m E IC7 O zP§ O ri> C OA ':.IP c7 A O ZS �� � AA xF mz � �1 y� � A PP �� �� G �= 2 �;>< � �P >; �fyi � = OAm> ^A '.-� A O � � O iph > -i r y o to m � > ; >O v�ii A Z� 1 O > r>�i�'Op� v< N mAr r� � O � O L � �O A C Am� � O) V > ZyOrn A.. A>O 0 A ZOm A4 >-i �+i OZ 5 A< N N m m > m mc�o�°� DCVi y o� ryN{�i � �'�>��� �r.i1 rtZi"' A �Vl o = g�A �y� Z A O ���� r+� aZ Z $ (� �>U��yu?"�'aiO mAv . . A2 Or>AA. AcgmP p Z a. SQ�m A z O A.. A Aom A� Qy UCn,J N m Ac 0.' O �1 �2 R. • > 5A,��.g� . 0'.k l2.43 o�o -<A.AA.' Val A8 gA ;� O Z > p>7 2A9 to Om ? O U y N 2O Mg8 2 A _; �$� y b NN Nai5t?$:v°o m g 2"iZji $`" N ZINE. r S C 1 z3 �1 o ,.Oya , _41 gN 'O PAAq z* 0 U+2 >m + > 2 ZA 01+N�Y�" a _ 81_ � 2o �.Ai z^'i `� u� Fm ,I � AI� ; i o m mm � � >Q> � � < S.. �� I �570� 0+1 m !�A Zm_� O�0 �O>p�0� � A AN O -IF 0 Z P f/)t�.$( 8� p�tA p� 2 >-i ;A A i T� A� � P"'f/i Vl 4ic a n h' O to m OYA = p A ! m 1 A L L r' q' A O rAi ,A Ls ON C u�o n .p ...p� (>� N '�D A f��I O>� O <> > A� ODp�1 j ((m�n m Va 0 A y� O= Od d ;40,. 'AA..�DO Ng '0;N�g N O ra A ig m 1 _ .'ACr % O0 N z ZN > 1 Cm zr 00: Av'i �Z7 >4AN f" �`Q- > i�T;� C "RA O 'Ay m W mi8 i=,i�" j' A 41 i�.i QA C� A >`�.i � 1 i'O.< x07m �Cm�� A AmyNyN ! p1 �r.' �OM1M1 2.f� mo'� x]i0D p A > �� m �Z p 91Ag ': NV - f-* I+iy O Z j °s p*i W i 88N! !,1 T- 7.p4 0. > N I!QA q rei m, S m.r ,,H A 2•-•AA - r? y Da A A mOG ,2 AO A ;A qO Z j` u m+ NOAg yz Tz>iz$z g m vo > voAim o L m'z'=^�� ;m M> 2> 0 o T x .7027T; m p A m D z p N in > > p A < 2 �� � �'iA N�cm !n�gmy� < '� ,�, � � m ''A ym $ r a^� <o �� v m o Xo ��C Amo.21 k m ; 'mN. < F �` y t� z ol'2 2zo� 2AN 1 c 2 _ 2 z 0 ' mi ` z < Tz Pg p�p� g�;'; 000gi� � � m � ui1 � rA A gj �m1M ? O y -� Z- �/i A Ui��i S,^ (Of2.!l•%j F3>pm i.Ai�WO A r 4°' 'a 'Z..O � mm� Ri5 1n O M i,i O R � A _ LA CANADA DRIVE (BASIS OF BEARING) 730.00' 1C w (BK.31,PG.92) N 00.01'40'W 1026.31 I 883.33• A N - -`. , - - 1 N COMMON AREA�T _ - - - • N 1! , BUFFER YARD D � ,TiRECREATION AREA §z g o S i- > EE . , TN u 4► tr I w v m co y N i ,e___,_________... O , — —--- HIE -.4,43- Th 4,43—- - u I ) _ I O � ! w N � 4 m g a p a : i �!� V Q u r- L i) •5> y 4 I M �, I ��<: 8 D1 o I 8.O <.0 1 I m i # a CI V $ s a e N w Q o C' �i aka m r. ! 5' T U1 j; 2 c2= a• t81. i f * * 1 -s" t ci 0 c', of - I •.�.STI I'J--i V I• r t0 , a c, . • - I :7 8: 8 t• N u NT ` 3.1 4/83;12, 3oN _ ---StND-TRtP W*1-----cam e �\j C.A''A'Z , ZZD m j *Q D aD mvim_ w z r c.=� m 73 T ?. 8 8 ' m v CN N �' NNgND�� rT• � N ti '1E20'82NrK „ > .--,Dp ,_ _ COMMON AREA A N Ut gM .(q . S A lCcz !I I A CF LA CANADA B 1, 40, PG. 59 AKIN F P r o w �� �i Z N i[I ocn o0 n 8 7C in 1,0 ILL.ki "11118 ""*...'.' '''-: __-_` � u CHOW 90UItVARD e -z" Fr" \ -. z • . -.I?: 7 ° h7E / ; h 1 _ , , i_o_. ,,,, , , ! 1 i��:NgOpr"O oOCD4 • _ p'• *o ,D l L I • .O . j-- -�?iyZZ m�,o _. - «;;u•',I � , I if till, oN r'''.:1.91;,' 0(//x0 N Z m00 . s Ze a i i � gg07.1n a � m m m A o m A m m Ov D ovNrtm O>08 � � i \: fE1� ogpOR O�{ rZ 1 mn nO o x� mZ -ri� C� p y rng NO .m D* Nm H m p 5m,i1' i � "� i 46 -.- 3.,,-,if,-:-.)i§› ; ,- ! ,r1 c Nm tiN n � ! �SZrOc i ; � lv C4 r`;' n41' O rol nOO 00 z�-_. �=\\i� f IP,: P o D -1 '5 rD -m m� i <m O o � mmm � mm � � rm 'm •� m m g o z 9 z o a � \�%' i� ! !) o qi 07.2 .1Z)1 N r�, rm2Oi-D 9A -'. R° R. LZ O C C:Ho oF2Dtlim Z/ 2 Z -1 Z Z D Dn N D Z O C C R . ZCmA V?/)3 - �i !U^„•'+'5c2. ii, I!li rm Om Nw -, ° ` ,�' l '`9AvrZ iI >.N oD m m m Z8 \.;',,". R. R D N V ° N A W t.,:,-,-; -9, g 2 com c . .AN•i&Mr ffiffwmffiff , , , ( 03,.31,- .9 mu& immimagivi , 1 -WI N 77 ... .,:ii‘.......w.. ., ,c:llW..... .. ..it,.,,, . q ligLis- - - e _z. I .g g. beiNP"M.-:-. EL kV 6 tsio _ sominummormiimurArammIrair M - tn. -------•••mfirmiiMiptMEMIIIIIIIIFe" II , N.001,1:0".NI '- W-3§-2 41101111wallri7"7,7 grill liV, ill, , -_A/40 --- ,------ __________ -„, ____ jr,--,-- .1 F.,-ti, •pilie Ile a I/ _ ',1r-ig2 _,_____--- --.:171400--w -.-''. .-1t ., :i,i---- r_.g: 119. ,..33 85_ , ' -4 .--7.- A---_-_-,,A ..A. ,, - - - -mm -- •,, A 6.12..E.A.._-_ ,to-m-n, i T gg.2;S1 Ai itc e le 2 ,. /pm ; ....msocr . 1 1. Elf . -:M------- -bi- ' --- I : um idil loilt 21, 1 ,1 k: i ' 0 Ef 4111 ,..wq 1 .IF 1 it • , , --- .,,_ . s.... - iv) 10 II ItpAp clilrag--.16 --- ..._......i.-e -____ ...,. . 111114114Vidito, ,.. : • . [A,: ..._...__.__, ... ...............,„ gaz,,111,...,...44--......---•v-11!,..... .__-.E,7-7-:_-..,....-..=-,--"=-474-.77.-M.----'----7.---- -..--=-,..-.==_----- - m..- lik,:s..,z-=.. ..-...- -..-...---ii,14 .,-Iiirtsww.,TaiiWic491RWIMBEIMEIAMEN11..45un Pg‘;:,T-iENG 8- 1' I 1:=1,31 •16/10111111,ZOPAIMM --"'"''''..e.:1;7".s...4.111MMOMMINVIriiiittdibrilliErardialni.---. rT1 "I,• !;:10.IremalLW---- -Zl1-4,,,,..---4,--- F.---- -,-- -...- -,..,...---- --------am. \S Pt• 11 1111 ili 111) r. r Fp' oltt;i1p t 14-* Aitiii- +pi,i.,,,s rf --... •.pi- --,-. 4,-. ,g)/(---....-- .. wi.. . A Rilim '5'1 11- 11 fi 1........1. 111ffiNjil 41.111f 0 m 5,ovi',,,,, eillillilliFi:::,1111,1ill'i, i-m:-: iii,frer Ic:, API:w111=3. ,.. L..1a1A 10i • :LA:alirir r i A .. ..,.,". . ._.•..,:. ,,,,,iro, 4 -‘, Iiiiiiir • AIL g; 7. 10,,,,p 1 ( . Dagial iiiiiii„, 1, 0 ,:; '')>Ay, k ..,—:-,Lat--,- -:..Zr_.t.'.,,,.,v,,,,._ iii, ,.h,-,..___•-..,..,--,mttes..,_------_--,t,,._-,.-_,•_••,:m.----..._-=_-... ..7,7... .....' 1,* ',111 ir twat=r_igt.z.,.,-:-.idr.-rf--- ia ' 4-)zi iteirtl i-, -N_F.tzi ipeFilf‘r-9:711Wite-ALL--0-1-Mr-a------timi , • IV iiiNir 04111 ‘ ..)' ' 411*.y. 1 411 1 0 Pil• 11.141[111?-49E ri 194140 Hu- er( i • IMP-) 10 & iir 0 :,. ,11110.01Iii,itito ,kt: 1 'ONO ilii If II IA e.. 416011 hi k, 1 ''' kV' 0 11110111111 "'11041. ..'----li BIEI i k tr. 1 e rip 4 Ilk ( (,) rn . **4 it le -- PEP 16,111111! 111/f. e e./ir P, r ''' - 'fir*N. -k 111 ti. ' mon al-Tli 1111-I 160-,:_k PiP-4nPla, ilit ' 4 • .".....-- -i* AV , .t/(1i.. t._ IN*, .,. .20e.„. ,z,Ar,.._,..„- :,_i:„.;_.:tyr.---.-a._:,,,-. .=.•,-r-__.. ......._,Andtiv.. . ..,-ri 1,,',,. .,,r;740.741*.attigiiiriaitilliKOMMOPPEr 11111% 1 At \AV,\V., V.<414-tkWir.M0‘,',',41.:?,11Fratlialli DM saMIESSEMWENZMIlhltil C'' "r ibp CA 1M st \s,k0,.,,t4,,w,,,, ,__: „..,,-,,ii,o,:.- i-.-.:.;;--.-.---4-_*=L-- ill `', Lipp e\\;!.7.4.T-1,7-r--. 111.10/411161L LIAM --- -4... .40,4...... .,......._.-AL.e,„\)„,,,. ,„W• ,,41 ,.=' i JE.9§ f4),--Sitiii 11 ie ,,- \OW ggi ' .&ifet '651[:: - ------- - ri AIL i,i). c. 1.....4,,,_----pciliw.i-- .., --.... ,\I Isit,10: p igo....,,J---:, F.-a 4t ''' '41* ' rir. III ,........ i ... .4., \\N\ ---=-1,....---1- -----.,..._.__ ---•- - ,-------------1--- ,,,_., .w. ‘, _ ,,,...,,,,, .,,..\.^,? 0-4 , wai -tia L-,, \ •;- __,------N, --__ vglirly'• Qi...2227.. Ifi. 0 (-- , . ' ,z) — ------.=- - t - V • ..----------,, ,.....-------- '----- ---- ---- :, _----- 1., -1-- "ili 7----"-:::: ------=-------'- CI: LA CANADA W PzC3oC <XI 2 v)Fn t) cA - 3K40, PO.59 .2 A A *-"P>cocIE 8. fxl0 >-(73 0 9 1;1 010 > q 0 i 7 -9, J Scum Ag g ---7-. --- ------ -_'/),,, - (C_-___----. --- ,----,-- ---------_-:ff--_ -_-„,,--------,,,--,.- -'-- - "1"--Ap"-- ----71V - JP' ---------",--- -'-'-- - ----,......:---- -7------------7----,---____: -44 Marlitirtailialtateggi.IgNagrik-'7-i\---'-'-: , .\ <" 7 i2iT i '\..__ •-\, '\ ---,...SA.i, -,J..-------.;•'.4 7-, - ......... .._....... - ------ ,--" ,---„, ).,..\.,!..iit5 4 R'(e780 4 5,0 , 1 , :=, ----_____ -- q -.___-__7— -------t(.2 --,17---Zi\„--1- 1rir ,,,;-- -,--------7\I-:2---:•-\T-C___ ___ ',,>,„,:"---N.,,,_. _______,, - , apt,- - --,_-------- - ,,-, *- --,-..; • ' , , -, ._ -•.:--•••••-•,,, L , i• i.-X _.-1-- -13.1i 2 Ls_\ / ' • --- -\ ift e„ie - _ -• 1p ) ' ), :4 2-_ c\. /t-''' „m4PlehAllikqlftm4OMMOrm-'1621L- 4 3; ittipSVM TCre"10111111H'nir 4 ih 0 .4..t.. ..,s.........„0,...g.,061.....".N. 0 g 6 koril ,, ,k . .,,:- .4., _.,...\ ;.;.,,...._.,., t,..„.. SPL _55 P, 5T4 'Fa Mt 0001111'. _,,, / MOM r-spo,tr- 79,4 1 ''., ..... 11. 0 17:46-,& L ‘\‘.,..N.. .... ..-"7..... .....-"ty p ___ allAIM...e,%. Al \ !,,, _......41 1 . 4.%.jeigv,‘, 2;: P1 ,il, 7 LIP r 1 I 111 11 I i aiilairgliR.MIL, ,F_LII,L.I.I i i AI I al f a ft I,3 72- M:r 2 MIL VW,l',;.;,:~g f 0 1 i_ J1 „, .1acatwommounsmitar.---gamlm.T&vm.‘...-- . .r.wz4friAor V 1 r to,i; 5,5, ' elliti kilimie h opki g Cr Olg:• ? ..1`1) 5:I ''i,`7? P AKIO"-I4 L-\.!.\ -,-,- - to •-- , ' 921 IIT .3...: ills:1,.-4,0,;;;., ,-- • ._•-, 0 0 iWrI:7*.,■Ii114 ° I CI 44'2=D111: 1‘ 0 4 , . , 40 Ag ...., -.:' ___. ---e______-. --.7,-...Nire ,h. , katrioilti, y; 'r 1 j -•4% 4 Pe, .n.310g111:1 ‘Ir CIS ------. ...... 01.4411 .'401!(70"'%:--7 ;-: '-''' &1 (1141LIS3 -.! •pv 111,0 .,.. . ,...:. 4 ii,-.:,. R-- f----..7.------zric- --, vp'-",!!!!Lr. ;;;,.,•40 . * lOir , '7"...,,,,,,N\ LAn...4z..._- :.''•t"-----1'-,. .:.:::,-7 .-.___----=-- -•:-- siirfairirx4;,- 44.-1 • )iib 1.\...,.__......__ ,-„'i , ''''',%,,,--------_-_--, -...°41i ith9,-. Aill ' I 8 \,:n=leae.m..m..-,,,,,,..-___,..r, Aimgffpnnr.-ai:!,:aut-,:- .-- .z. --;..,-,--, r,-.,:szti-•msoL. , ts,,, ( Ismememmum-,----amiftwowtrortrapparwinscauselloriv .• • egima.mm.cvaresa ouna,rosammosa impr 4 2..1.., • 1 AillIlLa - ire '' Fer-atillL lift *POI ir IA. 1°1 •.A4 1 :,'. • ! :-. ' Jeggl ;: itilom 116.&.--- --_ "..,,r. ..., . 1111 - WO • 11111Pr P.:„1/4_,.. .- ?;-;,.:,i,-- • 111.::: . r;:;.; . ,,,,, - ,,-,40, , pli ..2 ) ariii„... 2E." '''..; • ':-8:1• .1 '.'-':: . ft. : Pi foe, . 0-10 1 t; Cil . Q C'lltilgittil kg 1-- - II. cn 0 0 1 .Arl vi!!,!, 1 1 i Ila cn r•Ti• q/ . ?:11 03 P.(be, u'".. :.---;'-- .. g:% ' E# r' 3-11114$ -„E)-171 bq i o• c3.0 - i,.. ift LitiM4 II -261 ...,..--- 7-. .........--.0111._.....„..,... ........_.7--—.. .... .......n..„,.....,,,,,,...,,,. ...............,.......... ....tri:4111. Al. iirrairIOWAL.marli Nip. . ,2 11,111111E. MIEllasAmminourgLowi. -Wolk - ----, 4 W -,'161111111111M1.1 .1161411111111L01111CAMMIELMV.==illiktit 4,.... 01 ( i I ( E i 1 A 1-1-.-w.".r.—•.=..;'a.- . 1 - -vri •. 1 'IV. rp ',14.7,- ---7.--,,--- -,.. .z--'• - iv r) •-J.,- • .• ift Aro, ,!:...7 ..• • • niv lik, ...... ,4.::•i r.:':', - ,_'•;i4l, 4 . .,,--&- _ 2r. 0 1 0.1w-- el k Atli ^ 0 MIL._‘,A1 ,..., .10.11E di.0.1.2- ,A1,._,..gbli- ,_. ,k hi,, Nimm . 2 - -- 9-0„-- __ ., ________ ,3-•is 0...I = ___..........,,,,,.,.... ...,... ..:.„...... .. -----------",--4----9,-L-----------T_2 --......' .. ..' ...'' -----------------,--,---_-'1- awiaftware .-_,..._7.-:--, ----",---,,,-_-_-_--. , , 1 —rn I (- --- E ST.DRAI NAG AY Choo...2 1 c 7E2 (--- -) - 4 , t g•-:8 E ' .---------L - _ 1._-,-----_____--,--11-,,, --- --111W-_-_. ------, _ . --„,_-___:---_______. - ,_____ _ _____=::_____ 51. .0., --------_,_,-----,_-,--- !_ =7:111 `1'11(1r.lacjipl-C;(4A; VILLAGES CF LA CANADA flE:riq00-< . to BK.40, P0.59 1-07-0;17C"r-0 6 A q A:4 A.VA 0>c A h ;,4>>r, OIR1r9442 >0 CAI) . R. ci 0 . , P C coo11 Rg -,u 40 , I I A l ..,,;. O I ` > 'J A -i v 16 jz • `-1 i I , roxm A ,m N O x. i O tb 2 a a SII V v+ ,i' .' > li N e O z �� Z 0. t7 m;1 R LOCAL ST. 15' c� MI , '. w u " ^�-. U 1 o f I e i0 m m O� O�-y 2 00 3 15' O I + ^i li4 Ey I D ' N i m ft N r`R>x> i 1+1 A I F +- Q -/ ( Zp y P-' 1,1Z y O I : ,,, ir,..i.;,.:':,5',1. i t.,' 1 i A -+ ____=-27_...__ ___•z __ ;I"), N ro ---1yA c7 0 � � i1 , 2 1 i P HI jj • / + ;�N -+ 'TIME' u 'f o i(f-1' uI. �u ro ,.1 . ik'llis : 4 n l OMNI • 1 3 N,,o t • ; EL ig -,1 iiiiii O _ A :,-,- ;1, n ii `''').• ► 0 > vro 2:1 Z + M� • IVa. :.fn "4 r �...; . :**Wail 4. 4,i., J ,-,-T, 1,t•ONI ‘. 1 .0,•_;, • _ ___ ro ► .'�a�� _ 1�_��'• �. ,, -- ra r U xro m 2:1 v '3o • s. ��►_�: ti-a P:§V-;%' ' pr` 11,. ,.'�:+ uM "-) n ftili----=--- --=----Al • �► . , -; - Z u e.--- „_ r- 0 6S \ O� 2 uiw mOZD= (O O m O A('N N O G tp,1 01 1,,-, N N N u w N N j J (;.i �0 O$D ^� N o rti}�i "+O ni�DDZrOmZi, :ci ; N (n N O N N N N N N N N N ,2., p O p p p 8(g Z UI (_,�Z7��f” S U O U(Nle O N V'N P D �ti > I� �� D�D; �� § ou,�.Noo�o'8' Om8 �8'r,v8 8 ,c �OA�D O> moo,r u it iv m O ' D GN bOoNfJi g v 2 (,' v R NOO':D;DD lZN vm ie 1gmy Dm O m x ,),-,,YoAZ o fmD 'p D r.;.—.:.".,..-4-.N N N N N ti O 8 O P] OO8 7 2 O UNOSOO8 ^ • 8 4. R r 0 �211'.1�fN I'I.:•�II� tirwil �i.� �'1 �1'.... •�\f TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: May 5th, 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: David Marsh, Planner I SUBJECT: OV12-99-5 ORO VALLEY TOWN HALL ADDITION DEVELOPMENT PLAN, LOCATED EAST OF LA CANADA DRIVE AND SOUTH OF NARANJA DRIVE BACKGROUND: Sakellar Associates, representing the Town of Oro Valley, request approval of a project Development Plan. The approximately 15 acre property is located on La Canada Drive,just south of Naranja Drive. The property is abutted on the north by Naranja Drive and the Copper Creek subdivision, to the west by Canada Hills, to the east by a golf course, and to the south by the Golf Villas. SUMMARY: The Town of Oro Valley proposes to develop a Town Hall Addition on-site. The Town Hall Addition is comprised of the construction of a 9,650 square foot building, additional parking, and landscaping. The new building will contain a public meeting hall, several conference rooms, and will house the offices for the Community Development and Public Works Departments. The building itself will be constructed adjacent to the Magistrate Court and the existing Community Development Building. The applicable planning issues are discussed below. The Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised All aspects of the development plan are in conformance with the OVZCR. An additional 100 parking spaces will be added to the Town Hall complex, for a total of 251 spaces, including 9 handicapped spaces. Moreover, ten Class I bicycle lockers are to be added, which will allow for secure storage of bicycles for employees who commute to work via that mode. As the proposed addition is a 25% or greater expansion of an existing facility, the Town is required to bring the current parking lot in compliance with the OVZCR. Several landscape planters have been added to meet the requirements of the code, which are discussed in further detail in the landscape plan. The El Conquistador PAD All aspects of the development plan are in conformance with the El Conquistador PAD. The structure to be constructed will be a single story building, and will be well within the 38' maximum height restriction outlined in the PAD. Traffic Main access to this proposed addition will be through the existing driveway off La Canada Drive. Additionally the site will be served by a future proposed right in/out driveway off La Canada Drive,just north of the Police station. The proposed addition will generate insignificant traffic. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 3 Drainage This project site generally drains from north to south. The site is not impacted by any off-site runoff. The commercial use of the parcel will require 5-year threshold retention to be provided. The pond shall discharge the 2-year pre-developed flows to help maintain downstream riparian vegetation. This site is not designated as being in a Balanced or Critical basin according to Pima County's current map Dated 2-17-87; hence no detention is required. However, a detention basin will be provided to maintain post-developed runoff to its pre- developed conditions. This detention/retention basin will serve as a Master basin for the proposed addition and any future expansion. Grading Grading will be limited to the location of the new building, parking lot and detention/retention basin. The preliminary grading plans for the proposed addition meets the requirement of chapter 15 of the Zoning Code. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD ACTION: At its April 13th, 1999 meeting, the DRB voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the Town Hall Addition Development Plan, with the condition that a master plan and traffic study be prepared for future Town Hall projects. GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE: The development plan submitted by the applicant is in compliance with the Town of Oro Valley General Plan, in that the proposed development meets Goal 5.1, "to ensure that adequate public facilities and services are provided when needed", and Policy 1.2F "locate higher density land uses and transportation-dependent uses near major transportation corridors." RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the proposed Development Plan for the Oro Valley Town Hall Addition, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit"A". SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to approve OV 12-99-5, Town Hall Addition Development Plan, with the conditions listed in Exhibit A, attached herewith. OR I move to approve OV 12-99-5, Town Hall Addition Development Plan, with the conditions listed in Exhibit A, attached herewith, with the following additional conditions: OR I move to continue OV 12-99-5, Town Hall Addition Development Plan, until the following issues are resolved to Staff's satisfaction: • TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 3 of 3 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Exhibit"A" 2. Reduced Copy of Development Plan Am 0 L. P d Zoning Administrator Community De pment D rector 414,dI Town Man ger F:\OV\OV12\1999\0V12-99-5\DPTC.rpt.doc EXHIBIT "A" CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OV 12-99-5 ORO VALLEY TOWN HALL ADDITION DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1. Public Art for this facility will be approved prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 2. Provide dumped riprap for energy dissipater at the outlet of the proposed 24" storm drain. 3. A master plan and traffic study shall be prepared for future Town Hall projects. 13 OI .14 02 25 03 30 04 35 0S 50 DS .60 Ol TO " .80 09 9D 10 I.O II 30 12 .',!S IS BO 1...------;° jr- 80 N - Z "it .A, U�n c Q1 C�nl -�-it U1 r N -6 lP Zt -a °° W Q1°°-0 A N N z C 2 C A D O 0 3 D S A c� rn y °fii l-N N A rn c U. c rn ro n- c1. 1 S tf� i rn N rn N_cf1 @-6 ' 9, 1. Q- r r D r trl 'Cl --i{ i 1�1 o Iii A O z rAA A =f '5, A 6 r rn T rn 9 ter a3§ r<-rV 0 0 O- D1 UAS R 6 i A D ' r o c3 a_ 0 7-i r m D O n p 2 N N 4' 6'I'll c fTt rn 4 r r y rn N N t�-11 C�C� C� Z N (� Ill _ - y D n N Z -0 A r� (p z -�-p rn rn� y rn� y r 11t N FR !" _Itap' We A z ° a sUss1rnNi-it NAAnOrn Eit O O irs n6 Z i N A1D 4 °rn r ON r U - 1 w N Z a rn? p H � � �n� z n�to��n � ® C�� umi�n n°g D D m ! — FRto .1 y P m r r�i 6<DII itrnrn 5 D Z A r m c m A �1 m Z A.°�N N m Q ° U ,, A N KM g A u, ; A o z rn -' ° I A ! I j � riDo g� � o ti T 6 Z m O r-, rn (1j ' I Z O N N N N N AC3 OAi n p �n� n � �RI N�Q pfir �� �o ;l � ;, '� ',r vi a rn (� SZ O iii j, F,'; w /� rn pip pp �q+ D t trl i.J 0 s N S i -. N o o O f�i tit tf1 I Sli N D h A�itO N •8 N w ' O D D tAs A rn Arnim z �u1Wn u;,.o m u N ct",I o Z (y� Z O ,?,rt pp 4,, L g iti : 1/4, �i y I�rlx D=O yYq 1-i1 a y��cz. ��°� SDA iAli--''$ °I'8 � i �m Arn rn‘'t rnrn�rn z OA� - 'City A C1 D O- ; 1"t' {. '' t+� J. � ',.:,.----,:.4.,.! T '. ;6 T,'OS A l O A x til ° �t •' :7 : ,C. .4-! {rE °x x x x Z I Z 11.. _ ,. f-.� :1 J ,^"'•-_ ✓{;. i Y 11 � [ill D°}�i ..1...-',-'-..'".. ,:,. "� t r-' •t r .F,��r. ,, nZ � ,sim+rz"`-!, t�'��� ''2 °f m rn = :Vi Nz (l r' e:• \ ?'. r' �..r,,, -; `.'�� 2. ' k: if:rp ° rn° C7 r A �. I•. :'.°�C ` r ' f,. is a+ o?li •.r ' :.-F ?� S ...'rnrn m A rn mail t t y' ✓, L-� „twa I O�r Gl(Il ni ',I,(I z-I `' _. ' 1 i: %:� , . s. tr tiS m rn rn T fi DfT�<lrnA � \�, • Q •T} i ;,,•.--`� i. �'��-}"'/�- _,. t .__ ..�i: �� �r mi J a�'� ,n. �qll I� I.,'I[IIthN � 1 � �i �''�, .'"' Y.. � c ,f w �. }mss .,, 1� , ��Nto a t.,- i''. N�O�A �� tt.� „✓ ,.‘-.-:.,:,-A- ,�''�\; i,5 f. _',• 3 �ti� t~r,. '"� :,..,-4,.. .!•�`- "'`- ..�" a+o ;{ ww.�0-1 �� ii it'. CP i - .� ' - -f-i. -. . . , t -• > >' 1 - t7 Q'L-OD 'i I .L.. 3 ,ill N rn ,u:w'�`\ '. .r��" t j + �,: ".•,-: ✓r-'+ra`�': /' 1 1 "'� ��i.'t! v�iy�'..._..__ 4II i 3 3 3 3 y��A t • �\`� r' �' \�� � frf �•�' X;..,. <,. t,. ..:i„"---. -� l~ .. Z -t1- :.x r.','•S=':' ,L...._.. ._c r.:._: j7-. yr {� . � Z -Z C' O�� _: ti� .�,� ,.� � �...✓f--7r �:i;s `%s•`''r �"[.i /'�^"` 11�f c ° O DD ;�'.. «u �a� .1 , . _ fl',-,;...1:„„,.:::, �`'• •,t 7.:t - r ,-..-4,..4:,... „I.i N N N N N 7ZZ!1 �1 + _..r` �� •; �a r�P _ i t. -'$i,y.. ,fid.. i r -1 �: Tii N (-O-,-,.. y - F �, .' ,r^ 7 �;- \1 :f° ; s' .bx. 1;:,,,- } _ . 44.,,,,,i.„.,, -,. -i;_, W e Q f A•'10-A :\ -' `- \°. %-•' �` :`�' ._.. 1 :e --g, `$ _' '�a vI :,ew.r 2C, (11 (Q{1 rn�N Tri N�N O D CI\ :\ ^� • �; �� ' � ' � -4 -- �«j •,$�i �'i+t' :a:..iitil Q' t'Ilrn-TI T , 7-.... .;. � ..�,, ` 4 p.. ,Y..rft`�, =.v....s t,sti:•_�_,�.-` _.?` Mt - fir j, {.t•- `r. t t 'i•.'�i'':. • � 2694.V4'.15 O � D GNiI \:�`'`t: tyy* -' ) �� `\ zi�� :.+s':-r �"`� .<�� '� .11 ui :_ i ,, 1'j xA •\ iii, ', -p.Q d[11 p D W� i `•,. ��`'' ::rrt t. .. - ./ \ r��•"' � ,",r'6�.44 _r ...f � I i- . .. 'S'a'd.• �'atl YZ, 11;:lti t i Q 2 6 9 ..I Rt-i x N i V' >/:, i t' ^..:_- ..„ , $ °t ,sa 4 q,741 ,c:�,`-..,' a s } - ,t ,\ '. ice..x�_ IA 't i] 9 D.Vt r 6 2 `� 1i.,.. ._ 4 Y j !pa� tp�,--1 t, °Q ,Ai '\ -‘:::4•1M.',5,:: -"*._a+. "*•:.� - ; a \:,,,,,‘-';...4.-!:, t s, _: •R�."'^':'. ':r: i I ' -•E.. i; -A -,,-6'`,14,-,1,. -t�n rn-o r `: •`t'{f;,� .: -;.14:s + 0 ', –„,.....;L, t� ' Elirn V-:11 f fmlt 1 �.?, I .>--:..r.4..,..... '1 r -^r `, r 4 s f.i' �..�� ",•�--- --p�j-'--`' .,y' ;; ' AI rn.rn 2 f g A O. ` 1.',.•;-_,.,,...';',..::,'..;...:;:-... .,;.2... ti , .:.,µ , V3:$' 'di' "... �, :j g r.- :r--. N - -.j"1 ai -'(6 :�---. �`'7•'[{ `` .� , .7 I r s -' t•,•p'> p ,/``• `.f =!. qst °. �_- „,...,42,.,--, :.::::::.:' t`� : p � -i -I °_ ' ;^ -NL 1 1�L �.. �`�,:�ti�. �,'y t� �y-i �..�..a�i� �,��} P-s-:), {:, - -- "f .� s}.t �- I.,i�.'� �f..y • (Ap rn ttt t:::'::,:....;:::.'..‘: '4 ti •k • r A t $ `i 1 rte, i' _• +'- 7„.,,�r__ - c, : prI-i y Z O pt t .. 1z F, -4 xti.' �I.• ..Mx -,: i'_:�:i a' ��I�,- -,_,.:',.i.-,....,:,;.- -.; �`.I Q S Q _�/.:M 11 1 •`����� 4}�4' ..fix ?�a .t -r�:,,l Lr xs4'a'. m� . -::,-.1'1 rr'/ _ ..,•-••••-•,:. -1. .---E.---- � � ,1 'r., ,I ,l,i -ill A c''' � � 'i. 1. •#* t s C-w•. f .{„ ' Al /� _ ll - 4 ..'! '.'• Baca' ! 1�'j ..'.�{�y .. ' �' i ��'���' ��p � �.::��1;�j�!1\l +; �"�g�`�?'*bwa ,.�,'.�� � ;;`�+^!�'�3�-,� ��r� .�.M1.i�L ��ar, �-F��'�; :F�«ry, T. fil � :•�c:: ��`i '- t\^, [ �, e,�� w`�'r•. efifii.-I4-A,;;ie- ���+_ a�R�,; ��.� � � � �t,��� gp�j '�-�?t,7� ,iI• iii rn Arn Oprn 1 -4 F ��� ; ';. 1 kti . 1,¢;aa? � , � :727.01---;�i., 5 l�IBQ�j. T rz y ,� (ZZZ ZNz �jj ,r-tQ IJ Z��� r i'� 5.., • 4..,� -+ �1t `�����_.` ..-.!. -gY ''''t-,'I.,..447. -',--'4.•;;•.' . p '.SwY'tia.:'a li •ir �1 .,' + ll'rt! a f-.s .,Fa.. f It -I � ;i � :�as., '} • � tt � e!' ``f .% �"�`ra � i �.;; " . `�I�`� �w��. .� r". O z°O�Oz� ��<<_ �/ i 1 r-1'..i.'..-°=:.„..1,__' �. � ;v'+ �'� / � �' tg�tg.+ -.,e', a ._r 41.,---.-::.:",;•r c t :' � i.-,�x ' 1• �.•- {� T Z D CD -i fTi I'I{ j-6�ZOZ i ,:\• t,�, /a M ?,,t! ea'°` S es, ...f A t. t.x a y�z-'tR ;7.-' ° f ' •1 ,1: 31 O '�twil O A i W O •I/ ;''''L'''''''''."'-`4'1'..)".:•- +.�."i-d.l_sv�q t t;1;•�t / . .�- .r.� `;x'.x ' _ -.Ej,_•. -- '' ,-.�,,a - t 1, r )' t '., w "�«� Y s. ; .. .:d,t'l _i .a 3,�,e� �%,f:, , '�t 1a✓ , • p°O°-' t°z°tai rn D� �:��- nl sd�MOTd ++1 +,;1 ,' �- `'�r ���,� >r °', __ G r „ ��u`� - �'li �I ?!- m rn rn m m A rn \ br000%a f x* r e e� .Nit 1.:,-,41:4; k T Gl p .5 q1 r(n�› o z rn* / `sDd; ) ' # ,.s . 7,11 '!,�i ':—_T -. - 4' �t 7 1.* r F t L. m fit-n ilffSil�y(�Ij Orn 6 {D;n ."„/......,„ / "'''' i; f ,::: ,/; ,) `.. �;'° _ f t q -I-} .c-L i ` ' ; !ii 1' I ..„ t[mill[mfl troll[mf1 g--t N O[m11 111,w2° /� ft•'�- i •t p• jr {[i, -I•� .'- \�'s,.�"i at ¢a / • 1>r` - e- a ;r t �`'^tm� t'�'. !'i :`1�ti.f�wD° ��� � / :�aq:�f�{ � t,�'! Jff ! _ '�� k �,"''°a ? '� ` �_sI :.y 1� ��y F.-:'. '. i. �.f .I I¢ NOtit6+ Ot / ,. t i F j. .r dr. .� ,'/ kl�.% ®i t �( _ 7T.,,, ^__ r ,,,O ._ _'''ADrni33 X► l 1 ; ! �' rf �,$•.. \ nc.io r�� �!�1Y - � �. .1 —�{ �A �{➢� -fit�°—y� �f'�.. ; 4 Jt r r ,! tt{: �j,�{/ �°�"�-^-;1.1A. �i- 'sir '��w;`: 1�, M.. /�� � r�rlt A ZA I / i t :,; /'•._.. , fil K,,i -14017V1,-..41 { J '-.1. Iy N 1 N 6+N O t - i t .,r / -... R N �� 7",,,*,, �r.ar u, „g 'k 's / 1 .f O.p Y-1 J.0 O A-p.71-0 (� F { t!t f r r;. :.;... �i. t- - :iF °_.__.. O-i ,e'� �'rgp,''4.'� I F 1 o N O rn O �' ; r' / y '-` ., 1,-, _: . ,', % h I.Iii I t a I l�� fNfl I•ij � � D fNtl T rn 71 T-1-'` Q +�•- :1:41;;(171.1••:.=:,.,:,.1,1;��'`'r! �l��pM� / :..W1s ••'.- , �� "' `."'�r�yejr'��..'�,'g' �:'-�/x_ i1 �'�I I •t` {1 til �Q fil '� !' .. 0.t .. r .� r p%r.A1R•MR- 9 o g ## �i���.,- �(� i y --, 31,7.6,,1 _ z A i v - fYt { L- i• rose. 1\-- , , •rJY-Q-«r `C R,i 1 i ,HT 1 t 1.' I: l N D D O I ,, x..s: , 1 r i,.t'��+i E{r ;�' _-`` `$ I'SG t' . 1,1® �.. g; , 'i,`} I .l`'' 1�it D , Vi N°Ag ' 11''d7 t1'i % $ xs�� • �' i.I! A' N1� Ni O-1 r-I ��OZ O�A � , ._ t � Si�.'t:T' �-rr� ,.--,V,12.'" t1.,�• .• l '" � � ..,> "�`� q�i^:' •$`� � � �6� r�,. ; W D A z rn 1 i ,� '''•1' £1 c', I - f/ ,,. ',, W r Dr `� p r - -, i . + 1 ,';lir .i , - { I iI t �CP � � m �N rt1 N ,ii. "(SI,: l` ...a:. 4 ?I!{t 1.,`� >g S �� � ,r '� ,,� :; yI ,�S::r.' ',1>: - P"41 I�j A mp�� (Cr �` s:a }tw.a , `.', ' \'4',L,,:•'-:-',:-.-. E i� --:i r 3 )1i*; 'r,/-; 11 �..,,. t tiii7- :1.•1!i ;I i i O D F,•,`"-)---9 n O `73,-c7-1:' ;�; P `,4_0,°3 0 � ,,.,1 .` ,L"1 . r f Ili/ ,` .. --.<.... ..,,.`;-:''t:'.'--77-7 :t •`'' --tt 1 !<< ' t trs D D(121 b tzi{ T_ z 4 :•-•,1•.• ,: -.' t'• r r. „ ,, 4 r° _.. j '`1�.,_r>,, 't -►,', s s I i I ll O w .I <, a ,%i ll. �. ''. 'y- ,.,-1-7 %' r.• _ AF-i,°4 -n r.4" I•n ,' , .,�. ,. ISIt p i 1 tris %), O y - J i:,:r'4:�;1.`,,.. • • �1 .7.,".".m'�� ti` 1 1'4 ,:;I • r r x gN \, .t rt'. 1 1, ? r 1 =r 1 nliw O r I r rn t y e,a, t I ; n fn y i o-. o-0 o-: o-eZ f } . $ i`''ii` *'I.I 4 Iv U1 tJ S1 CP"1 a. w W N - _ '‘.1_:':,..11'.1,01.:1,�( i. - --,A,.-- ',A,•-i� I s'! ' 4 aR Z Z1"t Q° m N Q3 D C�Z t�-6�D 1 --{ N o f� s x y ) .��•c: .. . ^ r ... „A.;:--7,.., � ..ti,t, } Q° �z m 1),-1,,iril.g-,\RT— TIOT ° �jD � z��j00 �� � �1 "_' � + ;0ZDrn ° & iR .E.'`.!ii(; :,4 • - r i /trl t 1 I : iitz OzAOzN , O �} , (t fl: ,., zNON ll Orn O lNrn ':',\''-:V.,''''''':.•'-'7.'-'-'-:-:-':‘,'. ,.r,. _ '1 • r ,, I,: -1-Il til'',,,,,, [P tzii till 1 O N ,'c..+ai r'--. ..>._. i - .,.._...., ' ,•:I p A�7 I i Iii m D z N O �1 r °�1t A(.N 00 .. \'‘,.,:. ,,,,,..,',,,,s0 1 t�••,,,,,'°`,„`•, _t:: t, /'J ._ - :!' _,)•;dr i.°, ,-111-i �P:14iii;itItirj'ioUl-it s`�O nof�g� r�i 7 ,t � ,```�:.. p! -'-.,. 'j _ "'iz -t <D F \ •', Pr - - 1 ,."- {C ,rr:rq �' / t11rrQZ 'itotf ANEms` j; y. :.`:` ; i ` }, ij iIrc tJ1 - r01 rnA 7q m � t, ">`' ''[:•l ;',';'�.;�' - '� �.�'11 i !�i @m Q q1 A f�ti y O N Z D'Cy z-Zt C�. Q1,-7.,,,, '' f�? f f `'. .t .j, l 11 i' �+ 1. 70 c- (, Vii Ny �t1 Nx r 1i-1r •! "' . AA O a x i nr i, I. Cf�O�O Fn D D�W A rn�-_t-O p�r _,A � � .. ,` �' / t � 11./.:,. rnoO NAy jrn O-D[s1A�rW - rr r s ', ;/' f �. �3. p O��n�U� �rt C� Op�z�°D�_o fll m -i s= D / -- } ;Y 4.31.k llr � _. ? ' � ,'`�, 1.rn O8Sg,i °O Rm0 �.D-° rp1 �' S. r a::: `F�1 Yr 'i_ z rn !� `-� k x 01 N•-{ oo N�1 CP 111 r rn ty t } r , " "`"",` +..✓ ,/` i O D rn z r O s�O � A w - O Q� c� �. �; t ,�+ 1 � - :� , ' '�,^t;i":r •r N N A pi O y s rn O O=p!q 2 A§,,rn rn O _-.�, • /` j.t1r',i`t& �:«� II, 1 l' '-,T1 -1I r u D< m r�ANZ �tl° �1 L`,''1C`,., i.'J.' f'k,:.,..„ -- !�,...- L.... . r� Z 1'll �S tl V1 ill ��z��-0 O � j 1 y , (`��,: ^) _. '� i- :�' I I �. 1 -,-3: oo+ A 0'W r in ''N-I�z,D n O Iil {r �,`'.. is ; 1` ;' 1, A itx -, l .rnQw. O N N y° r ` .;,. r ( I; Ir � � r � O n"rn =� D � �,. t ;s' ` ''�• ` '"`....•--... 1 ;�, ", � J �i F ill" (I z ° c....,:-T, � z z�01 D�'� n z� � .r.- '��.4. �.���. � _ +`"�-�: 't - �� - r.� �., •,...i...,,,--,,, f! �Jr -< < �t�Np OZ -f°y rn y Iii O i I • -�ti�•. `. ..-:..-r/i.',1-... r'.'r , .,,..,` • ..--••''tel' !A•'•1 '.1 I, ,', Ap .A D D= O-09 A p -� S w: w'..w r i':1: / f •'i i al!.1f is• [p � c� -+ rn Z -�y Z = 1' {{-^e� ^''��.�,- ---��,�}t i";, / ••..,,,,�-:' • f lr :-/,..,, ,: _ is , iii {, N_I _O fl I ':/ - ..,ill'•::... _:::^/#, f f ' 1. J7 ;I ` (1 N -xt lP--1 i :ti=-;,, �p .,,i:?t. :`t•, x,�• I{!,. .t_, ,' 5,12 D D N ttf N �tTl-( x D ..,,`�V. "'.:.. i �v %� �"!�,.:'�'•si•;� " `� r` �. �' „r 's` it ;: -I -I -1 Ol I m - .. r::�=- ,:ray. -5".'�..•r;,.. �'��' ��� - i •'!tt';, ! !;i m Z O -4�1 O ITI Vi -TI i `_. ',�':' _ • `,:,.,>-%,,ci ` •� ,I 1pj�I 1. Z D W Z1J10 Q O .;:<':-:',.:i'''''''-'1''',',..-..-::''''',--•• '::�%; _'�::. - . .tii? _ � - 1, �•t 3 ° X11 I' --{{N )a Gl' Z 3 "�` pit ,,. i/ .,,,.,+:..:-�T.i n,.'rr`n.•�;.�` __ -+ Ar'' ITI- -I D , . ".:•' +r-.:w .. - -„Lr-: .PfnQ•: .. it `n t flt - � _ I N � r - W _ A N C7-i ..:ter--. ie-,,-,,,- ..:-:., sr��+� -:--_-,7•2::-:•-":7--,';':::::--'--•- . fP X011 7tJ z -1....,,,`-,,,,..,,,..,_,-,...,,,--:',..,. .., .. _-..•..�.- 41t : - - .....µ, ms � -I O D - � I-Ij Zt til ... -. * +r^-�..;•+.t.:...__ - ,,-,-.•-•••'',-;•,---- -<..�.4 ,,,-4,--2------,,,,,,,,,,,,,--:,-,-,• ---- sh .• •-----amu".-..•.'.---.'_'---tMtr.''4” - - �-- ..... .... D o `34 3 �...�... j____,..._... ..▪- Ill ='f No 'd1�4''� --,...4;:,;-,...-,-----c-,-,,,,...- :..- A � tD� ,... . __...A....--r— _ _ ,; �..'" ._. - .aalz•va' �r (r r.- j - u T ,,..,.:<,1 N ii 6 2 oZ T. fit o r [ b '` j 3 gS, - in N 1 C rn z 1i' ^Y.t ^-4' *r - cril J e ° m �• (� .. ...y � ---� O ,r. � f = t,64::14,-.....:. 2Y ..R t"fg�t °a"'� ['s • .... •'�l ll W +, A -� � �g1 --/� N � �/0 j,r Q ?r" «' s � ffi��$ ..,„:,.,,,,,,,,,,,-5 _ '^a ,Z � !,.- v y ,,' {I' I-1-,-',1 kliallht-,,,,:F,,,,-oicil'_e ''-ii §i c; r";-1,1...?10.:,5'i 6 2 F 6 (l (_ N O N V rt-{ _ g i 0, op: i N t.*` ',i`^-1 g,' ''w- 1 xr� 1 L. iii A- -)!- I (-;. ,, : gli, • — � o b g > A m Z W m 7 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: May 5th, 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: David Marsh, Planner I SUBJECT: 0V12-99-5 ORO VALLEY TOWN HALL ADDITION LANDSCAPE PLAN, LOCATED EAST OF LA CANADA DRIVE AND SOUTH OF NARANJA DRIVE BACKGROUND: McGann Associates, representing the Town of Oro Valley, request approval of a project Landscape Plan. The Town of Oro Valley proposes to develop a Town Hall Addition on-site, which will be comprised of the construction of a 9,650 square foot building, additional parking, and landscaping. The approximately 15 acre property is located on La Canada Drive, just south of Naranja Drive. The property is abutted on the north by Naranja Drive and the Copper Creek subdivision, to the west by Canada Hills, to the east by a golf course, and to the south by the Golf Villas. SUMMARY: The Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised The landscape plan presented is in compliance with the requirements of the OVZCR. The landscaping for this project is focused on the landscape planters in the parking areas and the area immediately around the new structure to be constructed. The plan calls for the use of a variety of southwestern vegetation, including palo verde, mesquite, acacia, ocotillo, red sage, and prickly pear. As the proposed addition is a 25% or greater expansion of an existing facility, the Town is required to bring the current parking lot in compliance with the OVZCR. Several landscape planters will be added to the existing parking areas, as well as the new parking areas, and will feature mesquites, palo verdes, and fairy dusters. Additional vegetation will also be placed around the new building. Moreover, Staff has also requested that additional vegetation be placed between one of the new parking areas and the retention basin to provide additional screening of the drainage structure. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD ACTION: On April 13th, 1999, the DRB voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the Town Hall Addition Landscape Plan, with the conditions listed in Exhibit A. GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE: The landscape plan submitted by the applicant is in general compliance with the Town of Oro Valley General Flan. The plan presented by the applicant is in conformance with Policy 9.1H, "mitigate negative visual impacts of buildings and parking lots...add aesthetic charm, interest, and character." TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 2 RECOMMENDATION: Planning staff recommends approval of the proposed Landscape Plan for the Oro Valley Town Hall Addition, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit"A". SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to approve OV 12-99-5, Town Hall Addition Landscape Plan, with the conditions listed in Exhibit A, attached herewith. OR I move to approve OV 12-99-5, Town Hall Addition Landscape Plan, with the conditions listed in Exhibit A, attached herewith, with the following additional conditions: OR I move to continue OV 12-99-5, Town Hall Addition Landscape Plan, until the following issues are resolved to Staff's satisfaction: • ATTACHMENTS: 1. Exhibit"A" 2. Reduced Copy of Landscape Plan / , P . ing a d Zoning Administrator 1 ., 1 / i i pi Ilj ..Ay 41' ji , ,,,, ,r, o7F unity De ►= �► : • ent II• ector ` i Town Manager F:\ov\ov12\1999\0V12-99-5\LPTC.rptcloc EXHIBIT "A" CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OV12-99-5 ORO VALLEY TOWN HALL ADDITION LANDSCAPE PLAN 1. Additional vegetation shall be added to screen the drainage basin from the new parking lot on the south side of the site. 2. The Class I bicycle locker area shall be identified on the landscape plan. A minimum 6' clearance shall be maintained between the lockers and all vegetation. 3. Add plant type "LF"to the Landscape Schedule on Sheet#2. 4 . The signature and seal of the registered landscape architect preparing the plans shall be placed on all sheets. „.....,. , ,. .......„ ._ . __. , / \--1 • I . ' • . •- f' , 17'1 r• t:-----• •) • 'I,... • . • , • . IHI-',.: )1' , /I '”. -'i ii • ) :, .. 1,.,",! 7: .., , .....„.< • /. •• -2., ,, ......_.•______.- _ _ . • ,...,..---- '!lin•zu ) ,,, j). ‘,, 114,4 Iii '''' r :,,..., i.. / ,..--..,,,, __ ..._____:.........-- .,..,..„:„,„- . _E, ,...,,:-„,,.... -:,7_,,.. :.....7,717---""-17:5- ------4i---4._._. 1.1 t......_.„...• ,......,.....,, . ......1?7,• --.. /..,-,..-, . -'•-:---4:::•:),:-1.•-'•..'-,i.\?•'...:.I',c''..,.7-/---./..•I•.'•;•/ •,„..,.4'••7-'.,•-.,-.:1:;:Q- , ,-:..-.......;.,e;../..I,#"..,..7.• -- ---.-‘;.7'..)..-----.-,"-7",.•--------K.,-...-• .-.•.,•,-.,-------:----.--7,,......-.--..-.::-..:•...•...;.,..-.1 ................6x.z ,'1,,,-,.-)-,-;;;.• -,......-7-.•--,.-..- ,tAA ,'- . ; 1,7; s-'/ , -___•-;,•.7..2.-1-T--1-.---4,.'.,1"..."i-v •rzr•1, • ,.: :..• .AS.- •NNININBainill I.1:1 ,•i.•:'-•--• , ‘,....--,,, .,14i...,:•.....,-, ..../..:. • ' i L .t , --- Jr:7.c--r, CZ- -s. ea.....„........i m vospatait. ,,,, - -414-..,•i.j„ •• A.,,_,-- -';,- 4:,-4.. . .;f•-• -" •---"••rr ! • •••,.... ••. . ,.. ,,,„. ,..• lir .- .,......., • :k•• f , ,. •v .,... , „. ,....,..,_-__, .. ., . ,h,. 4r , -,• ,..;,.. ., ,...„, .. . • t Ac,,.,.>-- 46,.. .-,, .. ..:.• 7.4-.--•----,-----, '4:041 -• -, -.--:-i------ ' t. , . ,;././ ,:, ---,„-,,, 1, i t 1 ) : • • ...i. • • •• : - . ,..... .:.4..4, •- , . .. .-.• . 1 i .. ,i ,i.,,.....,_„..,:„,._. ,(.-..--.) . .:', 16-77;---, NA lig ,, •-i ., !...,.:.,/ \ i-..., ,-. ..i...,_.. , : cs, . .)_.:. -...-t. '',. ' 1 ..... : \\. --..,.-`:'4 •'.%-pi ,. 8 ... .x,'•:,,,-i--...i .._....] .• . . • ,,:',----- -' . \ 1 • ) -, , -!k . .,:::.-fi-i 1.,-,-, 1."!..-:,,., '17", • \ - -i.:-:4 , -.... 1..1 . .. . . .„. , .. ,...,!, ...., . ,..•• ,.' . t•-.5 `.,, .c.•'"',,, 1 :.,4,-, .•'• Ass ..... 4givic,..411 v-- ., i si ., Nu v0 p• ‘, •:••SI 1 - ,' ' • • . •, , M ...,c3,, c-....,..., • I :.,,,,Ilf. ', ', 1 ,..:-. ,ii .. • . 4•,,-- . --.::'-....-..-, .1....!.*:..:%1 ''f',.\., '•,, ;. ' 1 i 4'7' ' ': t---'1.[7.1.-- --.: •.--...,...,';',:.:,?,-- - ' \.'.,:e41 *\., - i ,...,. . ,I 4.4,-- .... ., lc1 l '' %, 1 ' '-.11.1i.. ."'./,'.::%!'-... ‘..,*1: .., . : ,. icT,' •-..(:.r, : \,, 1..,::- ...i.- ;:-., ,. -...- ., -,....,,,, ,4. ) ;, , .. ' ,.... . .,- ------- ---•-•-7 ,1 1.,,. 1 1 „..0- ' ?.•> , 'L,. ... . ..... i : •-•••1- ,.. - ' . ' ), • • •.. ..,,,,niK,,, . 1 .. 1';.....::!f• ••, ..... '',.., i,\.:fiii!,,•.;., ' <•••• - • I I '.....•,,- . C *3 ,, r-,,,, .p. „-:,,,,,,.. . , .. ,,. , . J.. ,„ „,.,. ,,.., , s : , ,:,,•,, _ --Li, ,_, , ,.... , ,, ,.. . . ,., .„......., ..., , ,.., „, i ,.• ,,,, •, „......................,..,..,. ., . ,...--,-",,, .,,,,,.. '',•....--,...,„,,./i.., ..../../,,,,i,,,-,,,,,'N,'„'1,1.10:1,„"e',,,,,., c >,•'".....\''4.),--..'.-,_,,..''',..•. :-..-._.\.../,/,,,, .....:'..(,-..:‘, '•'..•."._ t--:• (*i:-\,.-.,.,.-!,-''.1”';*:111,1..--`...--",*14::':...--.1..,_,:,.,,-,,"-k?J:.•_)—:-1,--',•:,;.'; l/ • .i..-- .. •...>, •,......,,-4., •-!:--, ----- 7-. -,-•-,,,,,,i.;--------.3,',9-:,- 7:-.1,..i, ) ).: ..,•-' N,11•-.,,,,ti,,.:714. .1 ,..•;F(' .,„ '',, ..: • ,/ ., .., r ,.. , -5..,,,, N.'' '-. -• .- „"..<., •.. N.- .4 .,...i ; - ,...... , .. ,,.....‘-. • ",,,,.',41.„.,;, ..< \,•.- i, ,1,,,,,.,..,, . .,,,-'' A#4.0.4W.:;"' ..,•?' '''''4,•:::.:.-VII::'..1•:( 1 ,. '-I'4IIII 1 1 i ..r-J3 I. ----::,ii.1,.:: ,,/,--,>,.•• / .• .. \ ';. .-„,.b.ar'. , 'NI, •::','_,••, '' Ilk. •''', - .1 . L''' . , 4-, A.: ,• ..,/,...,,, \ • .,., 1 . . • •• ,•4;,,,w.:;.,':.•,\: ••:••••••,,,\-,., .,.? _., '11 '4, , - --•,,,,, • . `••''''.•,•' •-•,...,1.....40,.t•:7::?;',),f-•1•,,\,..2',..1.5. •/ ••,., .,' i 41',,,„,,., ) ,.:S..-''. ..../ i ./..., .,,„ . . ,, -•'. .' --,:,--.(-Jo ,,;.,• .Cs-t.:,--il N,' ‘', ' i :.--,..;Fre' .'llt,,,,-;,,,..,, ' I \././. ''. ' •1!. i ) , 1 r-- ,. -, -I.* - r..) .-. .''-' • '11 .-.A.,' - •ota...,ii:.5'.- .1,-;---,----, ,.'. ,'• i : , 4:', 1 • , : ; . ' -: , ,,. .,,:.....-- -,-.,-I J. ,P.,.., \..•'',Npir::::-.,.. •0--- -,t:-4,-,. ii 11'. '..':I .. ,,I,L....'.\:,',.,,-,„,--.1.-",-''. "'::::,,..'.li:tf,,.-- " ‘,_ . .,,- • ,,,-,__- -- . . . , ',,...II I,,11-.'''.. ', .''':"`"....'iNi._',,`,(."'• ' .11' :, il'.:i:-"..'!-''' .1-.— ),- i',,,,,,,,'mi. :iii... , ',...,„1,-„:: . ( 't,,,r.''' ',. ... ::g:••, ..,..:::,•'-'11c1;'..i;1431/ A'::'....7'•'''''-'11,10M-:‘ t ' . , .., r, .•• c' 1 d . ifr..,,,.; -_ ',',., ---",•,-, ,,,'N•c„''',•f'-:: -- 41-,- I 1 '-:... .. „.. .., ',1 1 '• ..' . ..,-,.,{-.....-.N, . -; 6 ,‘„,.. ..,,i--„;••;,-.. . ,p' ---i --- -g I : .../.• .11:?..-:-..ro s',e ... ,.'''MVP,--='".,.:,..,,,.,.°.1';;:.:. -._ ;--ar..4 ,... II ,. I I/. 'if...••••4..i..4.,....••••••,,,,;' '''' •••''''`,4,4'.,...r• •',i," (, j, • 1.-,I, ,,,, ' • 1. i •..1/....•••-1.-":':4"::".."6;;;,.' - ir,,,•:;,-.,):!;44'..;:,'. f li , ij• • :,-.-- ___ 1? '44:,-*4-•• 4;e4ptt,,,.,,,,,,, '.11'•;;:',•-.i,":"./;‘,4 i......,,i,----. -- ,.•,. • 1--II-- .. ,,,,.. ,,, .,, ,.„:„. . \ s•,•• _ .,-.....lik:::,%.. 4i,v,-.4:2-477:-.•Viii-.-:!.. - ..yi -••• Ci—,,...--,) :_ ...,-. ..- • M. 4, ' 'P.;,:;\ '1 it .1 ' i! ':;:....:4A+.!:1:.,,, . ...:"'"tl".. ;i..,. ., „. -*;..i). • i , I' ANN', Amit,,_....Tr.. r-Ais '',)' f*.: 4 et.:'-‘,7+4.'•',:',,-,,,..''''..•..:::.• -...IL;.aOR i Iiiiicil ,,, F--:',.. .11u,--,..-1 10.„.... .,.. .., .. ii, ..-,;:-.....7,, „.., 1 i . lit.,--, vir... .,..._.,, -,.., 1 1 71 ,:,fj----).___..••• 1.-- , J., • 1 • .2) !....- -- t'....4- __ ,4:-.!•:•;':,.:::,"...:4-'..:::+::`..:.1:::* ii,„.,...t 1 i• !....-•,.r: '..! i -I- •:'--II !......Lik•. ,,-,I12 ", .'......:•,,,..,/ ..•i i i• .i.• • ; . ,,,,77....W:-,,...'' , , ./.., ../ 1. 1 i i•-:i.: „...,....___, li_..,--i-- .....\ ,,,,,,i-:;„,,,,,•41'...i. . . -----. *11E4: ?:'" . .t: ..V.-:)- ------t-"--. ,f '.'\‘-- , , F ..:- .„..„. , .,-.. ,--4-- • ------ ( '''- . 1 - -' / ',: r < .., .,,.= • - - i , A ' ,•-•\`• . t...,r,arm*: , : y-4.`: -,'---•-. ..111 . i ' •tn."-IkV'1,1', ' a • ,Il .1' ''' •-i '-'7,-'1"`^-•'''.•', ' .,. i/,, .*: ...4 ' r . • • t . ,1111,:.:•..,,..,1,..,, 4,.4-`• i , ... •,Ik......,-,/ '• -"I-7)' I J ";/ .1.;::••:::4 ma.' -V-L. 1 / -I ,,,,, ' 4.( ''''::: , - )? , ' , i',•,,,. it ' - ' . .t. • ( - '..---'• ...- 1 ' . '1-::: ' ,• ia' i •• •,i .., •, .•• 6 I _ , . - • i...).\------- .., .: i *••..•:::::,:, ' I . / ). • , •• ( .:".. ,,,,,A,.1. '.«14.• ,. :•,' I • § , \ ,;..,e'.-i. , .,.. .. . . , .........<,,,,,,,..,.,. \,_.._. : , . - 4... 1 , , , . ., i , ':,,-1/4:,:;,,. . il • • . /..,,,. '----- *‘' ' ' i ' , 1 I ., tl' ''t:4•-•, , .. , Aug,_. _4,-4, ,4 f .,4.! ._,.-----,-:---------;i•-4 • • ' ,r .'„„ , ---...--,.-,,,.ii, , - _____ , .40,,,- .-, '(;),....,_,...----,-• -,, -,R t ..c., ,..,,,,,,,....1,,,: ..,, . , , i. k ,, „, , .----, ,•..., r, .. . ...,_ - -,.A.4.;-- , .,\ ( , • . ..,.:....! ,..it , :.: 1 i I 1 . : , __,,—,4,--17---' ' ,I•••• ! ,r , U ,•\k,. ..'...' '.. '..' i'ille,;.PN':"::;.:::::::.'1...‘,.\.-17--•-tL ..7-':.-.'"'..---. \, I'..''''...:LLt:ki ...„1-/, • ''''T. 1.4`+'''•4-"---•-••—.'',,,,,,•:_,,•;•:::•i•:_y.......,,•,•c., . ,,, , i , , , , „ , -a 5, c , I :" '64 ''' „s' 1 ,'''' g / "% •-:-.,,,.`,..::`, •-:.-,-. ' ',"--,-- ,..4-`..\ '.,• lil! 1 • . ..... . _i;-.1-,,L'• A h' 1 g % 1 .A g s,-5-', A _Iig ! A' ,:.-,s.,,,,,,-...„-_... ... ' - - ...i.., „, ..\\ ...of ,.: _, .)., ,- a ', • -!) ., ,i. c.L i .• .4-*, . illi. . i.:1: - — __,,,,,z.• ...... ..„........, ; T-, m1:1 %.(-5, „------- rf N-',,,..-- - . 1 i --.7'7,, i . i ...,- --- • 81" II .-e i - ?,,,-, ,_ gg A• n •....--- •...- r\;*. .14' ' • ..1,-.. •• ' \• / 1 . §4 °' >i - i ,.. . .. . - . •ft ; , ri' r I 0 El ,Ai 90 i'l < + ' ‘--- i-- . • , I , , '. e''''' .I •' ..I I , ' t.1.' •Irft' ' 1 1 i'll - ' § ' • V' I .. 1., __ , .,-,‘ \it,,.. , ,./ . . .:• . .. i A - 1. 1.' _.. ig 2g - A A°,1 i c ....,, ,.,,,...,,,„:s. J 7...•,, .'•,-1,4 i i '. ,..1. ' •••\;.'• .1 \\It)'''' ' . --tt • ' ' " - u,_.,_8 li sR ei -,....., „ ...„ - , ...,-,.• .„... .... A, :„.,rA , A. . ..- .1t ..,- ii A ,-1, ., .. . , .• \.\ ..,-,- ,,. , --- --,,---- -/--t,..,••• .,, . 0 PiI •.,, P .e6 )81 lil ; .-..------- i .• \.\,,- ii..,,,,e l i -"'".••'•••..., "•,...e...-" .'' ' .•-'•-t I •' . ,.......,,A ''i: ' / . •, .. 1„i= /r (2, _IIQi1 8 '6 -AA T ' i 1 ililiCi 1 T.1 d i (12 i7 ,'.;,,;:\,...1:, \, ''', t;,.. :: ,,,,,,. 11.. wp1) ,-; ..._ m - :----,,-.,,_!_-_.:-.% i i i ; 0) " ,f,;;',,kt •N. .,,,.,4,,,,:;,,,,,;, ; 0 5 , 1 a ',:i: --'-:7:4-%v,,,,,,:':',u,..'4'''',,, C3 Z•< ( CI t- •-'icr! lit $ . 3. G .':h4V,,,,,.t.,,,A.,,.,: .:,‘ ,, o r__•-b-1--- ( r- >0 i -.:g! ,,..1,. (•\-- '-4:i4i... g* •' gi , 3, 1,,::::--,, : o :1-, -,,,,:•-;,-,A1,,: i qi z r_ ° n N.i....7.,...., -a,- § I - I 57-g I . . . p ,„ It. ..1. , 1 ;ii$6ii2,_l;f,r*:. ,crl6pi 11Ii[fl,t1:_I._.f1i-..r_.t1l-iI0K1.'"i:!-,,I‘•,I1!,1-.i'I,*il1--,l,I01?.',1'n;I•,I4,nI Rg_,H-l.:-i,iiI-I.,i I Ii ...—'-'---i1----i--'-‘-f17-_t„----1—.3pi'111',.i1417'10kA.1•14- r4-,- '2g 1'i. M 1 ii 41.ig141Pg ' 8 _•xS1 A i 12"Mk 8 F ; 'Hilk6 $ 2g ilt 1 d l'1•` I, iii-p-j-.1-,-/v.--„; $i HIS.kt<:,,:c:4 -H.., 1--- U--;.: .-1,,,v,w;m4...._____ `• 14 pi kb,,,PA,>•,*. 1 q• ,-.I, ----iirli- (14' 1: Tyal ,i 3.1 m ._ fit Rs1 ill" i 3, I. , cit 111. ?-.- $ 6 OR1 Otg 'T 6 'T 2 9' I 42 , ;> F.k F iAA R.P F 4Ig k1.3,:iiiil 114 -j I1:-...•:.....:-..ii,-.....„: _,..: ••••-__ ,:.,..: , •• 0 1 1:,....:.:....,y::•,:.:4':::', ,...„).,_ --i•-:...•:--...:. -,:------- p- 1, F r.,1 0 0 ::::... i 1 -,, y N , .0 0 0 0 I R d > 1 1p- q,cillri ; 11 i I 71 WI d i 1 6 ,,51h, >5;'''.< .111 4 i- '' l'IP4T!ZI ii i il 1-$1! 1 1 P 61 i I Di 6 2 , i $ a 2 Pi5qPIIq olpiP i E 2 ' gi-34' i 1 i - M i IiiH1 1 -11 1 1 'i $1 1 1 R V?.`riORiliQEIRN-g , r F (1 tg H g H H H - ?7,' 5 5 —1 , $ 1 _ UT _ @ i/i!ici c---'\ K:i Z c) ti • ' it-k-al 0 F ,:''':c,,,,t.,_,.-,,,,--,,,,-',,z,.--,-k„ = —to . , il, : ii " 1,!:!:;-,c- •.li,,, .,..,,,.,., ,. , ,,,,,,. 1-- Ni 0 41 '''11.A. 1 E (CI ;1 8 -$4 : 0 1..,. —I Z § al- 3. : 50—. a . F r" iti 0 co .11W • ....,..„ ._. ../ 19'7'-'' /I I ./..-'7::::-.'''. f • .,,, \,..., ,, : ..:^C 1. ':I .. '.1i, :/' .././.• .. .,. „...,.)., .. .:,,,,. ' I • ,,,p,,:..,. r i iiiii .....11.,r ----....., .,•,.,...--.....,, • ,. 1,1 ,IH :,,-.' r :,, ,.• , ...;.,,./• /.:„,,., i..,:•,.....,./. ,,.....,,:, .:,...::::-.2....---..„..,w...../ .......... •.„........... ,11,,,r,.. ----- it.4":-.7 -••••' ./7,..... --'71:- -a 1,-...-e'',:•-::...---",;• i''.:-:\• 13- ::•--,..*:;:!...... -.C,,,,.... .f,„:„., ---.•4,....., -'''--1---4, :!•!!!....... .2 \ -„:- '•.: I',..!..:"A.,,,,,, /11‘ -•• :-••••,:-.I., ..r.::;.'1•!.:•e„,-„,...-....-..:-,,,:....,:k-----.- ",,•:-,;,,,,,,,„.............:,....:-..........-.....,-............_,....................:......,............j....-..............,_•._......m.........::::..,..,...:.!„1-1,(..;„,,,,,Z.—....,_„•.:,,,,,,,,L.,„,„......:- ••-:',,::::::?,' ,:-:‘-'' .,,1:7•,..":••i'..;:i.:•,!--'-‘•:,- .:.---;:,-"'.. z -;.4-.'"-- '''. •• I, . 1'111 f ' - ' 7i-''.I '''• ,41:1•-:;:.11-74.:.-tr-'''' .7-C i ''. - -c...- .t.'"''',..:'" . . , 1)1! I .. .\,,,,,,,,.-,i,".::‘,:e.r,,,,,,1:,.......:. t, : ;,. , -.-./.....,....., • • . , i 2 ' \ • I ik'i; .,,,, •:,:, c 1 .. -/ ( N I I. ' ' ' • •• „.::,••••,,• .•-•.•:.:,,•.," •-•'.•'7-;"..7,./.. ' • r" ". !,..tie-",, ---c. ----, ' •. .,......---......,,;4,,,..„,.., , ‘ • , ii..\. -:'[-----:. .. .../...\---1 7 ,....,......-:'.......1.i.. -.-......., . .7...:t....F.--..-L.'....,L;-,... '',,,, ...',71:!•:L#Iiill'ili.:';"-if..:,...,;.,.:,.;,i:!'...:.;'.i...,,r,.:i,f:--b-4,,_.:-,,,_•••111..N::.:',";:',1\ , 1.,^IV • ;#' \.-•'1,,, • ) it' '1,4-1\r. :, t''...'' •A'/ ..:,... ',. ./I i i j ',,,," ., ,., •-,,,, ,,,,,,,,,- i I 1 'r..,.. : -• , ,.. 4 • V .1)!.o. -• .: -, - ':' i --- ,;•..ti ,, ?1 §'I ' i . ..,d ...... -77_): in-.....1_, \ - .. . •'-'',-• •• ' 1 . .\-)'•-.•g '4' !'',1,,, Yr---.1,,. . • . . , . ......c•.:' •'• , t; ‘,. ,-11,,-....\• --, ...,•:>. ) _ ''',S1.-''' '. -11 i 1 r .,......., 1 .1 . • , , a= p .. , I- H 0 \ ,i ,, ,, ., ,,,, ... j.,, ' .,..,,:.• , u, to , , .......,..• • ''•'1,- 't - • -• • - - I '1 1, bp 1 14 t-.I, -'t '• „.., •••.. /-;; .,, ; , I . ..., .•. ,..,...., .. ...../,... . .., .,„..,:: 1,,,..f,/,' •• c.,.. SK. . •-.., . '.. ,-,..: •- -. i i .,...- ) ' .- > ,,c,,, • ..,..... -. 1.• ..... ,, ,,,, ' Il 1 ,‘! -1, ' ' 1•_::;:, ---. .•,...... . . . • t- ....- , ..,. •,,,....,,,, ••. n •. ..,..., L111,„.„:f.I'l.''''' 1:• .../-.. -11--,... '' '''''' '• 1.'. ',,. ti, \ ' ”. .,', .- .,,,,.(s. .., [ • 1 ..,,, , • ,2e. :,,,,,,,:',• (7"--rn''' '''''''' , . '‘‘....?•"( C ' ;,1•I .::: ,.......„,„...„,11 L.}(..)'., ''''. .. ,-, .•* 1'''' 1 i ..i i' I '•.. .. N. ,„..., Q'''Ir.„4 '1,•,1.. \ I •I\ ..., . ...,.., . I: ., ',E8,111 I., .,,,..'""••••,. • ,.. : , • % . I e . • .,,,,A,,ef . ),,,',,, i m4. w4r.css'I'GM..,-..R.i.;:.: .‘,.,‘‘,•,...,.-'''•„ , ,•.3,.•, i t,; -_-,',tt al V,1".1 z 6§-16:1 ';',111,4‘. ‹....:,,-. ,.,,\, ,,,,............-7• ....,,•;‘,3 ..,,,...,,,,, '.t-,...r.„ ' ''.::' ', 11 • ' - ( ,,,,, .t• .../ tNIII,' "'',A ,,,dx _.,F • ..4--, ,',::....-•••,-••,,,,,,,,,,,,:+•--,-,•,.2--1•::----•-',,,•--,..e.,--.-.--.,:,,,,,,'.',...,...:,...1.,..........f.__._.____,.".7....../.-.,„:' , -, '.1'.i•, i I-.Y g>-0-,C4 , 7, i 1,.. ' ' .-.,.., ......-,,,, ,..,,,-.......12 ••••..*.., '•-.. -N„,. • •,•.,'•-.1, ' 4 1 •'1 ,)‘' c ii....., ' „,,„,.„',,.'..T.,1,,>>..- ...,•1.,,:•,,,-.... •Al.., ,•-•-.'''' '',Hmt"'Y'.... mrFz. m ..----.., ,t,..:, '•5( '7., Inj, -,.)?: . ...-, i '.. ;!...,r‘1,-,-; ' ,. '' '-'''/4:.., ..'•N't:.,,,,c ri \,.', I • ,01:1,L.,,: .,.....„.,,. ,.,i•,6 :,,,,*0411,11410,..f — ' c•-•si ,- ,:.,,,,/•N.-.....) ..':". iN ;•:'=. ..L'400-W...',-...., ''';,.f::.`'... '-...,,.....,,t,:',..f :., ''..: 1 ,.................. ... • -.. . ... ...."!1.1),;:. "(:, \ / .... ''•..\\ 1 (I 1''' '.1., 1,1,,.\tit' ie,....,_. ; ...,..,.. 1,_•. 4,ii..,01 ,.., ; 1„,, N:4". ..'.. . ../i..., ., ,/,.....) ,,,,,,_ ... ..\ i 1 ..i....,, I -I:', ''..Rhif,„ r '''I-. :-.--„i...':::.NV, N,,,,,,.'..., A / .'-',' , ',q 40, .: --,- -,..,.:.i.,.i,. .-1,-1 i -..,...1,..,.. ., .. -r'-. V .•• I•41'?:. rn /.....,,;..... 1,___,.,..,,,,:„1,.:',0 -, • -• I?, f -(T`' •. \• . I- --- . ,,•; , . .• ''..Z.R.,:,C,ik7.7 (.7' .: ::'..:,.-.• ::::.:.'''' 4...--Tig ' . .i. ' r i i •1'. / , . ''A- -'.:,,, .-/-,- ;,-/ u.,i1/4 i 1 ,ci• ,- - ,,,,,,,.....,A\ ,,,•:;,i,::.1-' 4('... - i ..' ' ,•c:‘4,6$8 • ' . ... .. . \qi.< (1.,. R,••,.., ...,,--,, ••••41,- - ,, .• .. X.....1---- ,' '.,./.1.,:f\:•.\- --6'''''''',\ '''' '-1,27'1' Lc3- I -.1-,T. •,,, -•..`,._‘`..\\•• - -• • V, :!.. /-:--:"T-1 ji-it .i , -' ! :i.r.icf-• i - . I I • •'I ' 'I 7. • -"\-- ,.!...,i! ., , : -• •,,• ..,. ..t.:_,..5-..... -- 1 ..:;,../--A-,•-\.1,, -sx ... %,,...<1,..--,.-'-',. .i.LW PI 71 it 1 1 j ........__E........-.3:1-11/4:, , ,• , •• , . I '7-- \ ••••:, \.• ..::-- .::-./ I. 1-.. ... -; )1- I.: i . ...... 4, ,\ ‘...,-..\<..- \..-. ,/'-'11 .---irs„--_. _--77- ,,;•-• --,...,;:--, ! •''''''.. ' \,, • •I: :., i. , ....,..„.•.,,,,:,. /.. ,,,, -r, . :......,... 1- , . ' .-C.,.,-i...,...j,...4.9 ',„ •, , ........, A_ ,. _ . , .... ‘,„,..:, -----....1...i...::,,_:.--------- •.... ,, r___:...2.-L.Li, ..•'''' ,„,0,, ..,.. ., ,: ,• , \ .......•• .x... ...v.__ __I: ...,,,!, ,...::.Hzi. ., ,, •.„ 1 , . .,. -----,,...,---• IN .,,... ' ... ,,.:. ,,i • ,.....,, .. ,,,, • ,,,,, ......,/ •c,•. : . ,... ......„,.........., : .... ' i-.1,-1-1-' [ . --1-,T ' . • - ''''''. ' -.,.• , , , , , .1 . k., ,7- .., -,-, ,. ------........m..., 4••••• •-- 1--,, - -. li...':1 ''''''''.\\:•:‘:TT... .... ...,.,....... . ..' 1:-1111 i . .g.,...r.,....s ,„ ...........,,,..,..„--.. i ....7.,.., _.. . .. ./. '••••: ./ f t•• .., AL ''',. t /...*--. ...• . il ,C•j.i.1 i I,I, ''',..,.....,..../ 1 f /r - 7- --- 4 . , i''\•-ato urr..ilL....* 1 , k, \--••••A.t,',.174.aela,*.i, , ift.-",i : 1;. •; ii , ,•, ..;•:,..,......" 3 ./ \' :W. _:L_ariiszo,-,,:,• !C =1.,-r,-- .".. ). : ; ; ik . - .•t / •- T '(t . •,,' ,.,,,,,,, ....,....! / ,,,--,.. / ',...„:., .•,,...1 .,,, • i i L.) / , .,.. , ....:.- . . . i . i - 1 --- I ,..&. A '... . • i . . , , „,/,r,„,.,1 • - .. . '.• - .. . , . •• ....,....f,...! ..i., •-•• ..„ •,..,••:, ...,... / . '.1'...ii:. . ' i I k: ' I I /71" ,-,,/ ., ., - .-t- 7 ., ,.. c . ".V.VI,'• . '' ' '' : T A ,.i: , ,•,,,,..., i I ,::.:,,..,. __..,.._...,,_..„..._eim,_,,,",, .--,,,,‘-, ,.• i.,,.., , , -. ,../, _, / , . ..„.••„.,, , , , , ---f r IgNij . /!i• , .... ___-, 1 ! ;. v . . . . f.'-, .,:.•,-T','-,' 1:1. ' .. . , ,) , , I ':I 1 ( )1 I . ,• .. . . ' -' .1'.1 • I 1 ,.,....,......." , ,,..,..,- , •\ , ,•-• .. __ . , , '-‘, i.1.7, , . ,--,——) •, . - — , ,, s..„,..,_ ,..: -.....,...„, .,. ,..,.----,--,----- -------------- , . . .t,, i ' ' %. i , , 1 ',6,4 I ‘ , ..'' ---'l,' C '.'..,..,./. 1'1.• .. ... , ''r, • I 1,i •."-.'\ ),:,......--.........„,..,...r..) ... . 11, ) ' '1 C.('• \I • • I h '...,‘. - .,:: .'... '': r!,,...... ._ \. ,.... ....,, , I (i..• ., ,N, \'•• .., . ...,, i , ; \t / „ i . ,. t 'i .. ( I: \ •/ 13 . I'''''it,'' •(! .1\•, 1 I \. '., V ) ... -. , . •L. , ....t il ' ' ,, . , •'('-''','. ! 'L..N-1.''. •. ',a. , • ,., . ,L.fr.:1,07 • . - 1 - ' ‘'- .).' , ..• V- ,•,, ! ..,., .....? . Illi,„ .- ... c '.,. •\' i- • ',i i .-• , .„.. • , • --,..... --....,..--, , ,•',,,t ,„ k.-.'' 1 -,., • , . .. -,.,„ i .. . '..r k ' •'I' • I//.-. ' /1 A - 0 t: k .i.i . • ' ..fr 4.7----i'. . ---------' ... ,. , •I. . . ; • , , < '',...,....-•.' ..:••-..,. ''''..,....:.'''''',.:"-... ' ,)•1 . 1 ..,-------- / . ......„....... •. \•' . •.' l''' ) -- LL.:. . '' ,t,„. 1,i , / k i",...5 '"••••., ''''' ".1'\ i 4 •'' . . ..,. ,1 t -Q, SA 61 1 i g : U) .-_,.• ,, .6, - X3 , - t i _ T§a -,' a) •,'..,,,--,N.•:‘,2•.,-•--,•-•—• 1'-'21 `-' c, .I.-- ';7. :.Lt.•*,, ,•'''`dr.: 6 R e ",„.....•..,,.,_,•-•„. N1-1. 7,..'io ';'3. '',, (,),. ,,, ii ,. , ,..,,,,,,•_..,•.,..„. , 1 0 x • - V• :it W r.,i r:o .-. %,',,,,t„.4. IV. _- .C =i 4,9. a;=0, :';‘.t.',,,,::'',,,,ke.!'•';,,,>----, 4 XIR i 4 I M to c, 0 P 45 , , ; 4. ifl -8`t 0 i $ it -111--' -71-:III s I d S Lii le'MIN. ,.. ; b"- 1- _ b III= . III..Iii m N_ ,, ,, ..I I trl IIF:�1(f111'.f.'111:I=I .III VIII t i 1,--'1_9101 :::.1.1.1.111.' -11 —,i � I! z_ j •',�.�'�1 , ,� II r. IIl- 111-=�1�--I - - ro� Su, I r� qC 11�"- �.. -:-Ill-•III +- - .�� g �Q4 I_.If=II-III"_j II II`.1 II �D N� 11.1 �.�-��G.r°, lli g4 .m13 iJ:::: :::::t1: I $ Fi A i le 1 i !ii b i.1 � ���:1 ........:111—i->�'�� i-I b� q iIi �I � Tr,IT�� 71 �' � �$9 t13-0.-1" i 124'MNFORHI aN.IN35 il �� �) �` • � �l',r 5 v e ! g g z a� III 1 iiii 4 — §9 r v. Iii W i@g cc; ° g .-.IIIi Ii i ' 61- 11 6 41 _ CVIPM :1 \:..tF �-N �� C ,I;g1���uG� C11:91111-573: 11:"'-11!!:.1,3... ;''':•:: : III:....III.: '`_ z I a _ r,,l 1 .'7-T r-•±1 -I I: OSI -'1.!E 1 11r:11�: 1.11111.!J-11_111:'111..11 , � �•::: 111__11111 = .i� •'4 _ Ilil iF = �NP12°1'11411. 's; lik:1 .i8 - it• III - t1 114')�y"'�i �—g------1 26i ' 4: Hi,� I ��SN" — 4,1 gi, I�Iii i 11 , ?�•I'--1B-1O( ._•_.. ♦ o_ � t11 it c, II---l1 1,-'11nilIli II-1 < _.....:i•t C>.c I g g i--j*, E 111 1) r -1�i1 yy. �2 Ili T � - i o;� t- �$ 11=J.'--ice I ��rg x�� � ��_�� � I I� �r �� ��1lIvill. �� g� � �� � x �I 1.-:!.;o:•• ��� I• III `, - tIIIct, r''..-',U ,,� a ki,.[1:i Iril §F IL:, 11--_,111 s-,:ti 8 §A ,1 IF ---,li , t 1.. 1 0 P ti iii1-= !,1! ,1.$ im ii ,s., ,t. J 8: ° 0! P rigg+ 11 i I -�` ill 1 111•.. --' �53_� �,,, 111_.11. ,,,ra ---=� 11�'•• ---1111 w����� �� C P� ti: i W lilt !j1111 ' � ia -= z4� ' IT 11: 8 l•�� '''g 6i il 1-1 b1M 10i Ore lk 1 g P ti' il- 1 '1 ii ; ii--- ri., ! '; 1 • 040. 0 lia i Al biII -iII o lY _ w . II \-rt._ . . . 0 ? 1 N 213 II II � r 41kq 11, 1 g 61 1-1 6 � o c ii T,t 1 V,T- i z- pt-r/ li 1-tg, lgi 2 �� $ � d;12 rn ��q I ' [cf-,' ni i r �Z 8�A F8 P.xth ii X6y x tT �01 rir6 ' vmi- �t � yylIl D.i _6`g; a,. Ri u' _$ N O 6) g s N ti sa U1 ` O eo 73 n a iii.Sqo ` Pi 1, n : 0) � ,7aaaSaaas -' ,_ s-,, 1. 'I:lin z 3 P Q1 li' a $ '�a, 'tl a 3 —;7yuwo�Kn �['�^c` P C3 .�&`w , D•Y F 0 Q l�'t P 1 41:1;*L4- 41 P' 0 >I— r . Ft e rr--rn m M f_ sik:�acUa'aliclRklt*.RCaea?Nc*.T:A�Ia<lctaV:.- TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMUNICATION MEETING DATE: May 5, 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: David Hook, P.E., Water Utility Director est s'ti i - SUBJECT: Project No. WOV#1-0199 ` '=`= =_-- 10k) Oro Valley Water Utility OV-1 Interconnect Priority A—Main Extensions SUMMARY: Per the direction of Mayor and Council the Oro Valley Water Utility has designed several capital improvements necessary for the interconnection between the Oro Valley Water Utility potable water system and the OV #1 potable water system. A component of these interconnections are the capital improvements necessary to physically connect the two water systems. On April 19, 1999 through the office of the Town Clerk, advertisements for public bids were posted. Plans and specifications were provided to interested contractors and public bids were accepted on April 30, 1999 for the following project: Project No. WOV#1-0199 OV—1 Interconnect Priority A—Main Extensions The project consists of the installation of three eight-inch water mains and associated valves, fittings, connections, pavement replacement and landscape restoration. The first main extension consists of the installation of approximately 265 lineal feet of 8-inch B+ zone water main within the La Canada Right of Way near the entrance of the Villages of La Canada. The second main extension consists of approximately 775 lineal feet of 8-inch D-Zone water main within the Valle Del Oro Right of Way, near Desert Sky Road. The third main extension consists of approximately 1260 lineal feet of 8-inch C-Zone water main within the Valle Del Oro Right of Way adjacent to the Oro Valley Country Club. ATTACHMENTS: Bid Opening Tabulation Project No. WOV#1-0199 FISCAL IMPACT: The total amount bid by NAC Construction, the lowest responsible bidder, was $108,483.00, Public bids were opened on April 30, 1999, at 2:00P.M. at Town Hall. RECOMMENDATIONS: CA. We recommend the award of Contract No. WOV#1-0199 to NAC Construction, the lowest responsible bidder, for$108,483.00. B. Direct the Water Utility Director to prepare a Notice of Award to the lowest responsible bidder and transmit said Notice along with the Contract Agreement and Bond forms for execution. C. Direct the Water Utility Director to issue the Notice to Proceed in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Agreement upon the receipt of the Contract Agreement. D. Authorize the Water Utility Director to execute Contract Change Orders and/or Supplemental Agreements incidental to the prosecution of Work. E. Direct the Town Clerk to hold the bid bonds from all bidders until such time that a Contract Agreement has been executed. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to approve the award of Contract No. WOV#1-0199 to NAC Construction, the lowest responsible bidder Or I move to deny Water Utility Director Town Manager a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Q 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 o Co O 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 c 0 0 0 0 0 © o CM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 os o 0 0 0 o o V o 0 o 0 o o 0)to u4- cc' 0 Lr)) 0 �)' iocoo0CQvo0ccoo tiooa000 $ gotEu8) o) rn8oN ut° gC 4 N r r 4 u7 N e N .-Q ..Ci w p N �... c N r-.- r CV v 0N. •w 00 A .... . . . . . . oil 43 toVfeAI4344 a V,4449V36A4444 Q 44414443694361614444636144 a. 61 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ao 0 0 000000000000o 0 01o o o o o o o plo o 0 o 0 a o an 0 0 o o o o o o o 9 o o 9 o �? c� O cv O v o 0 �i c,) co o u `N o 0 N. aco c0 v u eon c° ,- 0 u) cNv `,vr, vv c0 0 N0 upon ;: N N to r= ge j r- r) ap r. Id hr• r 0 r- r - - t[) 'd . C r- N C N M b in r C G N r U 0 C3 0 at 2 as ca C C C = V3 d!V) 63 60) 43 44 = 69 41 to 44 49 64 6A 2 V! b9 6941 44 44 64 61 61 69 69 69 44 = 61 o g 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 0 c000aC7o1� t-- tn00000 - 7. ov aooaioovioovi ;rri CD 0 u) 0 0 o I� C N C) 0 o oQ to U co t0 o N o 0 0 'n o to 0 o en u co 2tncn � C') tnoco = ornclN- rr) (p 200 _0 (DN0coCn �t00 .4 = et , f`N '" 6A r. C� N M GS to v vi w .- (D.- r-r= r tt) u o m w- M N ('1 h N v.. V) 41 0 C o C 5 8r U U V 0 z to 61446141)(464 z 6144V344V36R 6R z 61!V!49 61696943614616R61407 N z N z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0o 0 0 0 0 0 C1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ca 0 O o 0 0 0 0 01 o co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C)o C O C� tO 0 0 1A C o 0 0 o a o q0 C CO C 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 O D C raj a o r2. O © O *" u 0 0 V. o o O �# V C> e� LO o 0 o 0 0 0 o o ch a� • CO._ ) O L0 0 o in O Ln O O O O I� u T.:.Ul m 41 0 0 - Q 0 (0 0 -. t• N N t'') to a .- r r 0 N T. CO CO h► r- r' 0 N N N N r N tin (O 0) C ,- N Cr) C t'7 .- r- to C in o O 0 0 U U U V c I) C1 u u H 44 64 6.1 th 4 Vf ) 44 H 69 V)4'3 69 69 63 M 44 44 b9 44 43 V)44 V 44 6! 3 9 V9 69 447. 61 C C fit, RI > > a 0 C vl ti u7 y) 1� N '4 in C) W N •- .- +- .- • N v c� C O C) wow Ce o,C „- '4 O 9 ro Ti z z z a I- > EE E h a,p :: 5 a m '_ m m t W Z — >a > > in O al a) . v • W u v C7. v iiiV V . tob is Cl) cd cn r`5 is •— , ' 73 m m �? O o 0 r CV U 0 r- N [') t7 (0 tt3 1- C) .- N M ct 0 0 1- m• '- N C') .t 0 CO N. 0 01 r r- e- 1-- I- v r .7 % ° d '. °- — . ro' o ti9 ..„.1 O 0 0 El" c Q," , �. �"'` H O -- l,n C\il ac,- tL v,4 -,%, 2 A w Ko goA Q R q __.1. A V z -,.,A,. .. .4rti ,., -..„ Z ON It r - ~it:' P TN i __ , , it 4, c, 0 ►'7Owcen a CZ u c5 E ''. 4 te, K. 4 z ›, .„1 >. s-- 3-.„ ;7 E. w — 0 , cd 1-4 C:4 7, • 5: ti Q � calCZ ° 0 >.' A Acl; r3" al • 1 o "•� yi,viv) 4,''' N i ill u 1 . ts Nt* .6 4; 1.1 e. Q L; p \ q E o c) OD 0 .1i .; N) :19 ' l' ''' t; \ 'r4 O' iN 1 d • • • , • • N t•-; efi kn :7 t` oC Ccp — N x .--. \ ' t J ' ' J -7. ,-- , TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMUNICATION MEETING DATE: May 5, 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: David Hook, P.E., Water Utility Director SUBJECT: Project No. WOV#1-0299Q.Ce•-•\-5\ a)`�� Oro Valley Water Utility _I Y tt 141 OV-1 Interconnect Priority A— Old Linda Vista Booster Station Improvements SUMMARY: Per the direction of Mayor and Council the Oro Valley Water Utility has designed several capital improvements necessary for the interconnection between the Oro Valley Water Utility potable water system and the OV #1 potable water system. A component of these interconnections are the capital improvements necessary to modify an existing booster station within the OV#1 system to pump into the Oro Valley System. On April 19, 1999 through the office of the Town Clerk, advertisements for public bids were posted. Plans and specifications were provided to interested contractors and public bids were opened on April 30, 1999 for the following project: Project No. WOV#1-0299 OV—1 Interconnect Priority A—Old Linda Vista Booster Station Improvements The project consists of the installation of three new booster pumps, and a remote telemetry unit with a programmable logic controller. The proposed system will enable the booster station to pump into the Oro Valley C-zone system. The existing booster station will then be controlled off of the high water levels of the Oro Valley reservoirs within the C-Zone, allowing improved efficiency and reliability ATTACHMENTS: Bid Opening Tabulation Project No. WOV#1-0299 FISCAL IMPACT: The total amount bid by SunWestern Contrators, the lowest responsible bidder was $64, 707.00. RECOMMENDATIONS: A. We recommend the award of Contract No. WOV#1-0299 to, SunWestern Contractors, the lowest responsible bidder. B. Direct the Water Utility Director to prepare a Notice of Award to the lowest responsible bidder and transmit said Notice along with the Contract Agreement and Bond forms for execution. C. Direct the Water Utility Director to issue the Notice to Proceed in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Agreement upon the receipt of the Contract Agreement. D. Authorize the Water Utility Director to execute Contract Change Orders and/or Supplemental Agreements incidental to the prosecution of Work. Direct the Town Clerk to hold the bid bonds from all bidders until such time that a Contract Agreement has been executed. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to approve the award of Contract No. WOV#1-0299 to SunWestern Contractors, the lowest responsible bidder Or I move to deny -- I C Water Utility Director Town Manager 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 88 8 8 8 8 crC O dam' r C°0 CA Nti O aNN sr2NNC+7N 0, •r r r r •- r (11 41. r f40 V E C y60 V,6,6461WI60606,610616,6% f400 000000888880088888 e8gg§ 88c88iI880888 11 0 M c'') N N N Ni N �i c') N O a. 69 M iA iA iN W%63 609 60 60 610 M 69 63 60 iA 40 M a N T. it N N (11 gr- .re C 0 c) RI o) • N f0 # CMa. S• 3 ma. g 0 Q. •-- 0,1 to (o ti O r N C7 et (D 1� COm . , • ' , f R 4 z:___. 1 , , ...N fg. Q (Q v3 t e o R,— p o Q QW6 4 4 08 t a Q2 oc"'i. °4 ztal 3 At — 1 , , .) N 2 A 0 00 d W....IC gcl z-,. .1%, -L 4 d z ,t, o ct, ,.4 H © H FiFi ,u, C �i. • > c' e 4 001 4't 3 Qw.1-4 tri a V � cpcilte.g; z ,c.c. 4 a .... z , .,,,,i , i.-- , 1 . nV ►w ... F Z E. � NII ,:u, wE- Liil -.T ..t cp., O 0 › A A ' . \ Aa0 d 1 I 43 tf 0 • 12 1 ii r- '1-, N ww �+ CN Q al W ‘j Al Ita 4 ,,-4 O 4 V *a ..' '''' ,-' 4i '.5 NI -fl C;'-'''' r• % 11 d , , ,.1 N! i d •--; tom! ,-; -4 `^ C- 00 C: O N M 4 1 z '4'. 1 i P Es __ _ 1 1 . - _ •13 lb ;' cin \' `, 8 ` F,; G e- :2 q e. U� yyry •-.-+ r r f '� zh ' .._.Q,,i-yvN, ----T-- TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMUNICATION MEETING DATE: May 5, 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: David Hook, P.E., Water Utility Director SUBJECT: Project No. WOV#1-0399 Oro Valley Water Utility Ls 9\e_\i' Je-a OV-1 Interconnect !...,--,J _-,i -=_ Priority A—Miscellaneous PRV and Valve Installations • SUMMARY: Per the direction of Mayor and Council the Oro Valley Water Utility has designed several capital improvements necessary for the interconnection between the Oro Valley Water Utility potable water system and the OV #1 potable water system. A component of these interconnections are the capital improvements necessary to modify the water pressure zones within the OV #1 system so they are compatible with the pressure zone boundaries of the Oro Valley Water system. On April 19, 1999 through the office of the Town Clerk, advertisements for public bids were posted. Plans and specifications were provided to interested contractors and public bids were accepted on April 30, 1999 for the following project: Project No. WOV#1-0399 OV—1 Interconnect Priority A—Miscellaneous PRV and Valve Installations The project consists of the installation of three pressure reducing stations and six valve inspection/replacements. ATTACHMENTS: Bid Opening Tabulation Project No. WOV#1-03 99 FISCAL IMPACT: The total amount bid by NAC Construction, the lowest responsible bidder, was $89, 730.00. RECOMMENDATIONS: A. We recommend the award of Contract No. WOV#1-0399 to NAC Construction, the lowest responsible bidder B. Direct the Water Utility Director to prepare a Notice of Award to the lowest responsible bidder and transmit said Notice along with the Contract Agreement and Bond forms for execution. Direct the Water Utility Director to issue the Notice to Proceed in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Agreement upon the receipt of the Contract Agreement. D. Authorize the Water Utility Director to execute Contract Change Orders and/or Supplemental Agreements incidental to the prosecution of Work. ?. Direct the Town Clerk to hold the bid bonds from all bidders until such time that a Contract Agreement has been executed. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to approve the award of Contract No. WOV#1-0399 to NAC Construction, the lowest responsible bidder Or I move to deny -ciipp.,...-_,A c.,A,L_ ater Utility Director Town Manager 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c o o o o o 0 0 c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �u� `Q' 0 CV nCC1!) 00000' oPP• gN N N Ce tO 0 C N1 N •- N Cq C O 0 V ZV)in.( U)to,.to,U 4"U N 00og0000000a cr o 0 0 o a 0 a o 0 0 0 C a o v o o a o o a a o CO (a to N CO o co 0 0 0 co u tri ci wi 2 N N N N o U aU)1 U)U) U)IA U)U)U)44 44 C ra C N 0 W ca ca .- C 0 o) (5 0) 4 4.0 H > z LIQ E C C o cDzt w Q v Q R .... O -0CD r- .. m O. r." m <I oc rn H . , ,, , 1 I Z , , 4,174 c.T. r- (1--1 r 4Z VI i; IC) 6 4.4 I Qa o in g) isii: 'g mt o `, A Q �' , ... , ,0 . # k -.4 A Aa 4 W v aic—. iC;--) -- q Q, .2 c d z al — ›.. 4 1 E. o It\ :44 r:: 2 E-4 g; . ' 1 , i r4• 0LMa <4 ri-‘ i g .4i-, 4'4 .47.1 u , u d i4, 4 ..., , t .,t ;'..i ,t >4v) ; kl.. ' r..WzU tiW 0.1E-+ Eva* W 44 1st It = Q o > A a �. ACCO d (72 ' cc i 4 o t il, . , 4,-.. 1 -4, , v ›.,4 *.sqw 81 31 ti. 1 a g g 1 ago %. 1, , `� 1 1 R I 1 , . %. . -I 3 2 1s % 0 0 N c'1 d• sri `J N: oo a 0 N c+Z 4 to % gr i § • 4 - .-4. \ ; \4. 1 , r E t,i § 46 <cc,' . E ..4. 1 o z TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: May 5th, 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL FROM: David Marsh, Planner I SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO. (0)99- 22 ,OV8-99-2 COPPER MOUNTAIN ASSEMBLY OF GOD REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ESTABLISH A COMMUNITY SERVICE AGENCY FOR SPRINGBOARD, A TEMPORARY SHELTER FOR ABUSED, ADOLESCENT WOMEN — CONTINUED FROM APRIL 7Th, 1999 (ITEM TO BE CONTINUED AGAIN TO A FUTURE TOWN COUNCIL MEETING) TO BE LOCATED AT THE COPPER MOUNTAIN ASSEMBLY OF GOD, ON THE NORTH SIDE OF TANGERINE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 1/4 MILE WEST OF LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD. BACKGROUND: Copper Mountain Assembly of God is requesting a conditional use permit for the proposed Springboard residence, a temporary shelter for a maximum of 20 abused, adolescent women and supervisory staff The Springboard sidence will consist of several bunk bed rooms, a kitchen, dining room, living room, and several offices for counseling purposes. The project will be located on the northern portion of the Copper Mountain Assembly of God property, and if approved, will be built in conjunction with the church and recreational facilities on site. The site itself is located at the corner of Tangerine Road and Como Drive, on the north side of Tangerine approximately V2 mile west of La Cholla Boulevard. This item was continued from the April 7th, 1999 Town Council meeting. NATURE OF REQUEST: The CUP application before the Council this evening is an unusual one, as there are no provisions for a `community service agency' under the OVZCR. The origins of this request are part of the translational zoning process for the Copper Mountain Assembly of God property. As a condition of approval of the translational zoning of this property, the applicant was granted by the right to apply for this CUP, which is permitted under Pima County. While the OVZCR has no definition of `community service agency', the Pima County Zoning Code defines the term to mean : "an organization such as an orphanage, home for the aged, YMCA, Boy Scouts, CYO, YMHA, Campfire Girls, or any similar organization organized as a non-profit corporation or supported in whole or in part by public subscription and primarily established to serve the social and welfare needs of the community or any part thereof, and not organized for the personal profit of any individual, group of individuals, or corporation." TOWN OF ORO VALLEY ` -"OUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 2 SUMMARY: On April 27th, 1999, Vice-Mayor Johnson facilitated a meeting between the applicant and representatives of the neighbors surrounding the proposed Springboard facility. At this meeting both parties agreed to request continuance of this item to allow for them to further discuss four specific issues. These issues are: 1)the intake and referal process used by the Springboard facility; 2) access onto Tangerine; 3) police issues, with particular emphasis on runaways; and 4) security issues. Both parties have agreed to an additional meeting on May 18`'', and have requested the attendance of the Oro Valley Police Chief, and a representative from the Department of Economic Security. Staff will work with both parties to facilitate this meeting. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends non-date specific continuance of this item to allow the applicant and the neighbors to continue to meet and resolve the issues to their mutual satisfaction. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to continue non-date specific Ordinance No. (0)99- 22 , OV8-99-2, Copper Mountain Assembly of God Community Service Agency Conditional Use Permit, to allow the applicant and the neighbors to continue to meet and resolve the issues to their mutual satisfaction. OR I move to approve Ordinance No. (0)99- 22 , OV8-99-2, Copper Mountain Assembly of God Community Service Agency Conditional Use Permit, to allow the applicant and the neighbors to continue to meet and resolve the issues to their mutual satisfaction,and direct Staffto: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ordinance No. (0)99- 22 . 2. Exhibit A—Conditions for Approval 3. Concept Site Plan and Location Map Plann and Zoning Administrator 4,,,,,i,„..y l/i . Irl �•.-�u ity D /pmen �1 ector Coi L� own Manar \\OV PZD\PZ1\OV\OVCASES\8-99-2\CUPTC2.RPT.doc EXHIBIT "A" OV8-99-2 CONDITIONS FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPROVAL COPPER MOUNTAIN ASSEMBLY OF GOD / SPRINGBOARD COMMUNITY SERVICE AGENCY 1. All structures to constructed for the operation of the Springboard residence shall comply with the R1-144 regulations for accessory buildings. 2. The number of beds in the facility shall be limited to a maximum of twenty (20). 3. No person with a criminal record, or criminal charges pending, shall be admitted to, or reside at, this facility. 4. There shall be a minimum of two supervisory staff on site at all times. 5. This CUP shall be reviewed annually by the Planning & Zoning Administrator, with input from the Oro Valley Police Department. Violation of any of the above conditions, or any incidents having impact on the neighboring properties shall be grounds for termination of the CUP for this facility. ORDINANCE NO. (0)99- 22 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, RELATING TO ADOPTION OF A OV8-99-02 COPPER MOUNTAIN ASSEMBLY OF GOD REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ESTABLISH SPRINGBOARD, A TEMPORARY SHELTER FOR ABUSED, ADOLESCENT WOMEN AND FIXING THE EFFECTIVE DATE THEREOF; PRESERVING RIGHTS AND DUTIES THAT HAVE ALREADY BEEN ASSURED AND PROCEEDINGS THAT HAVE ALREADY BEGUN THEREUNDER. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY: WHEREAS, the Town of Oro Valley permitted the Copper Mountain Assembly of God to apply for a conditional use permit for Springboard under the conditions of approval for the property's translational zoning, OV9-99-21; and WHEREAS, it has become necessary to adopt a Conditional Use Permit to allow for Springboard, a temporary shelter for abused, adolescent women; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, having considered said Use Permit; and having held a public hearing on March 2"d, 1999; and having made its recommendations to the Town Council; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY: SECTION 1. The Council hereby adopts (0)99 - 22 , and conditions of Exhibit A. Three copies of the Conditional Use Permit are on file in the office of the Town Clerk of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona. SECTION 2. The effective date of the Conditional Use Permit shall be thirty days after the adoption of this ordinance by the Town Council. SECTION 3. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of the ordinance or any part of the Conditional Use Permit adopted herein is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. 1 SECTION 4. That all ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be repealed to the extent of such conflict. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this 5th day of May, 1999. Paul H. Loomis, Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Dan Dudley, Town Attorney F:\OV\OVCASES\8-99-2\CUP.ORD.doc 2 EXHIBIT "A" OV8-99-2 CONDITIONS FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPROVAL COPPER MOUNTAIN ASSEMBLY OF GOD/ SPRINGBOARD COMMUNITY SERVICE AGENCY 1. All structures to constructed for the operation of the Springboard residence shall comply with the R1-144 regulations for accessory buildings. 2. The number of beds in the facility shall be limited to a maximum of twenty (20). 3. No person with a criminal record, or criminal charges pending, shall be admitted to, or reside at, this facility. 4. There shall be a minimum of two supervisory staff on site at all times. 5. This CUP shall be reviewed annually by the Planning & Zoning Administrator, with input from the Oro Valley Police Department. Violation of any of the above conditions, or any incidents having impact on the neighboring properties shall be grounds for termination of the CUP for this facility. Nig vir t 6710' `. 40'NATURAL LAhIDSGAPE -EP . 4' - �6 � \. �. _ _._ _._ _ -.-.-.- --1 I S N ---- , , ' 1 o)i k ° 6\ \ i - '99 SPACES•4'-0'EA. Q ii 62'-0' � ln� N o tf,,- I o o ° \\\x ! I 0 L-= I q 24 SPACES•o 4'-0"Et. � 1 G ,i K2 ...a, ? ,_a_. i c j_, ,\\-\\-\\\,\\\, „\\„_, _...,.\ \ 1 (8 NSI, , .._,.., \ x 51 I N U _ — \ \ l 01 o.-0.. o \ .a\ 3 II I \ \ b o I b \ \ \ Ir m -1 T ,0.0" \N\\L\NN\\\\\\ •, \\\�\\ ,25'-O' Z \ i 24 SPACES•4'-0"EA. I -1,2 i ()- 1 PaNit-o" 60'-O• Pp40 1 i4o. I� , O i `` �----'-� 94 SPAGeS•4'-0'EA. `p 1 0 I I I , 8- 8 ,i 1 zI I A o 1 `\s 1 iso' 1 I � 1 ! 1 1 \\ I 40'NATURAL LANDSCAPE --- --- --- C$-.-__,___ -- 11 * -....N„. ......116 ,......... _ .- ---NNn......1k1%*W......--- - lik. %. ii i$ 3i a nit ).� 5 12 E 3 1 , 0 , IR o ., a a z 1 g mom §.. 6 § ®E \\i = Vv .c _'_ La Cholla Airpark and Twin Engine Traffic Patterns A. *11:** ,,,,,L , 0.‘ ''''s.,\''''''',\,\ , N 'N',‘::,,'‘ \\N<1...\\:\ \ ''''' \ %'\'\,` \\ 144,%?, cr, st \'‘. 4 ,L.4 \ \.\\''''k I - ;v\v . \ k4,' W 04k- \ - \\I 1-,\ TURTIE DINE L 4 PRNER NW \%1‘. ,4, KIPS\,. HAWK WAY ' ,,, '\''''::'. N. HAv1clANa vw►Y , )fPDE HAVI«ANR WYi• - • RtIART WAY AERA5TAIt WAY aa� ,NA c 800- 1000 w a ,, - '; Feet Above a g Ground ql A Level �,. ..,,,N. i .*' ,„k . MOORS . 4 3 m,HUNTER \ 400 Feet LEMoNwoaa RD Above Twin Engine Aircraft ''''..\1/4 _ :a 2„, Ground * \\\\,\ gr Z. RDLevel Single Engine Aircraft 4 ,\it\ Nir\ -• ciU61EW000 • pR \ '114%,_. N,,,,'a z 5- 2 \-\\.\\N‘ N: E___ Tangerine Road .-... TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 3 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: May 5, 1999 10: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Dennis Silva, Jr., Planner I SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING — ORDINANCE (0)99-32,0V9-99-67 & OV9-99-68, BRAUN AND CATHOLIC DIOCESE PROPERTIES, MAP 2 TRANSLATION OF ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY SR TO ORO VALLEY R1-144 WITH CHURCH AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ENTITLEMENTS. BACKGROUND: These two parcels are part of the Map 2 translational zoning and this report addresses additional Pima County entitlements that the property owners requested. The following properties within Map 2 are requesting translation to R1-144 with church entitlements and the ability to apply for a conditional use permit for a minor resort and a school: 1. OV9-99-67 Parcel # 224-11-023C Braun, H. Property (A portion was recently purchased by the Catholic Diocese) 2. OV9-99-68 Parcel#224-11-0240 Braun, O.R. Property 'arcel # 224-11-023C is located on the southeast corner of Tangerine Road and Shannon Road and Parcel # 224- 1-0240 is located south and adjacent to the first parcel. SUMMARY: In accordance with State Statutes,the Town should translate Pima County's SR zoning,which allows single family residential (.3 DU/acre), to Oro Valley's closest equivalent designation, R1-144, Single Family Residential (also permits .3 DU/acre). There was no pre-annexation agreement negotiated between the above-referenced property owners and the Town. Existing Pima County entitlements are outlined in Exhibit"A". LA CHOLLA AIRPARK: The subject properties do not fall within the La Cholla Airpark planning area as designated on the General Plan land use map. The attached map illustrates the properties located outside of the Airpark Compatible Use Zones (CUZ). GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE: Most of the area in Map 2 is designated Rural Low Density Residential (RLDR) on the Land Use Map. Other land use designations in this map include Parks/Open Space, Schools, and Low Density Residential. Oro Valley R1-144 the same or lower intensity than these designations. A church is a higher intensity use, but it is appropriate in a esidential neighborhood. A minor resort and a school are also a higher intensity use and these impacts will be addressed in the CUP process. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 3 'LANNING & ZONING COMMISSION ACTION: This translational zoning was recommended for approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission on April 6, 1999,by a 6—O vote. RECOMMENDATION: Planning Staff recommends approval of the translation of zoning for parcels 224-11-023C and 224-11-0240 from Pima County SR to Oro Valley R1-144 and all applicable development standards of the R1-144 zoning district shall apply thereto in addition to the Pima County entitlements outlined in Exhibit"A". SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to recommend approval of the zoning translation for parcels 224-11-023C and 224-11-0240 from Pima County SR to Oro Valley R1-144 and all applicable development standards of the R1-144 zoning district in addition to the Pima County entitlements outlined in Exhibit"A". OR I move to recommend approval of the zoning translation for parcels 224-11-023C and 224-11-0240, from Pima County SR to Oro Valley R1-144, all applicable development standards of the R1-144 zoning district, ie Pima County entitlements outlined in Exhibit"A", and the following added conditions: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ordinance (0)99- 32 2. Exhibit"A" 3. Location Map 4. Mr. Herbert Braun Letter dated September 9, 1998 OL, PA A 'ng = Zoning Administrator • Community Dev ment ►��-ctor //t/te-€4 Town Manager F:\OV9\1999\9-99-53\TZTC.RPT ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-32 AN ORDINANCE TRANSLATING THE ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY SR TO ORO VALLEY R1-144, WITH CONDITIONS, ON THE PROPERTIES KNOWN AS THE CATHOLIC DIOCESE AND BRAUN, LOCATED WITHIN MAP 2 AND REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH. WHEREAS,the owners of certain real property known as the Diocese of Arizona Property, located within Map 2, has requested that their existing development entitlements under Pima County Development Standards be preserved; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, has considered said translational zoning with added conditions on these properties at a duly noticed Public Hearing, in accordance with State Statue, and having made its recommendations to the Town Council; and WHEREAS, the Oro Valley Town Council has duly considered the translational zoning with added conditions at a Public Hearing and finds that it is consistent with the Town's General Plan, Tangerine Corridor Overlay District, and other Town ordinances, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY: SECTION 1. That the Catholic Diocese and Braun properties contained within Map 2 be translationally zoned from Pima County SR to Oro Valley R1-144, and that all applicable development standards of the R1-144 zoning district and entitlement conditions shall apply thereto to said properties. The conditions in Exhibit"A" shall also apply to this property. SECTION 2. That a private or parochial school as permitted in the Pima County SR zoning district with a Conditional Use Permit (CUP), may be permitted on this site. The applicant shall apply for the CUP under a separate process from a Development Plan. SECTION 3. That all ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be and the same are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict; SECTION 4. That this ordinance and the various parts thereof are hereby declared to be severable. If any section, sub-section, sentence, clause, word or phrase of this ordinance is, for any reason, held to be unconstitutional, such holdings shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance. ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-32 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this 5th day of May, 1999. Paul H. Loomis, Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Dan L. Dudley,Town Attorney EXHIBIT "A" ENTITLEMENTS AND CONDITIONAL USES PARCELS 224-11-023C and 224-11-0240 0V9-99-67 & OV9-99-68 CATHOLIC DIOCESE,MAP 2 1. The permitted use of a Church in the Pima County SR zoning district will be maintained for this property. 2. A private or parochial school use as permitted in the Pima County SR zoning district with a Conditional Use Permit (CUP), may be permitted on this site. The applicant must apply for the CUP under a separate process from a Development Plan. 3. A minor resort use with a Conditional Use Permit (CUP), may be permitted on this site. The applicant must apply for the CUP under a separate process from a Development Plan. 4. No building shall exceed 25 feet in height. Steeples, spires, towers, and architectural elements may be permitted up to 34 feet in height. Religious symbols placed atop such structures are not included in the calculation of building height, but are limited to a maximum height of 5 feet. 5. This property shall comply with the setback requirements for Oro Valley R1-144 zoning district. The setbacks are as follows: Front— 50', Side — 20', and Rear— 50'. A one hundred fifty-foot half right-of-way will be dedicated on Tangerine Road. 6. Access to Tangerine Road shall be considered temporary and may be closed when, and if, Tangerine Road is developed as a limited-access roadway. LA CHOLLA Al RPARK CUZ LAYOUT I, / 1r 1 4;:f4e ...0_4, N 1 14-.4 .\• .....,* •ai. , \ zi ,.... wool'. .,,„„ ,c,• Milk PI 11111,4,,,, 00k,,,it i 116. 11Plia.U‘. 1 • tt W •••• A It , OS 11114V7 Az),:. lik, joh lit>'41.9/ jti,4. 4..0>W111 CUZ-3 / , .,.4::.:,;,;:,,,,,,,, ._.....,,. , ,./„,,.„,..., \ \ I ...,„..„,k,f,:i:Dip,,,. ity::.,::,---?;‘,442,11111 .00: ..1 5j114 ,,,,. f::,:::......::,......2,- ...;, , _ ,1,-4*. i-..k.:‘,Ii ia 7, KV:gakilli 1,::‘,;,.., Ai r:P t gigigr.s,ii, ::".i;i-i,...l. .. CUZ-4 ...41,4)E .=„T:t.-.11.... :,,t ,girdillanigNifig .1.:4-f....,-.:; :._-,,ikR,-;,,,,,,,,,, ktr14stitv N. A, _....... • tyt 06:4,tier. 4,:41,'''-,'•ti%:-'.' - a . -7.,..........,,,- , VtiP• I' •oak' lif MOINE II Braun properti:,, _________. ,..,....-„, mill gm.p..1 ari,;:%? 1, i111111 ail.;- V I sigro 1.10;v :2;I:iM, t, • ** '::,i.: .---::::,.:,:,': •,.: 1 •atal:47%:11,_ 7 .4-g.z_ or'Ta'514"0'11 ,7.:,i;;;.:.. . .n,=... =,:i::.kr:: •;:. ..4. 4- • rAiji• ..1..qV,--: argiii•tvg0 1 - :',.,7,1-'?-i'-y.•-rti :.,-..,...,, a 2.14,, 0 9 ..k.Z.::' gFj lairatidT/114714 El _ Ii;ret; imigilli`..4.:iia.-::-..ii;iv- Et,:::.-..........; 1 — 1, ' iiiii:i-v ,,,.., ..- .,:.44........,.!7„:..z... I .:.. 1,',....• ... cl.,, fil................... ........... ,,A. .,-....•,.,s....... IS lit - Ma ............,,„,_ Ai.. . ---;71177P.1.4.17,:ft — ../..,..,'',.4.7.:7, ,;7,;==A..:... ..-- ,.- -•- : =--,.., ..A.,• ...::1 7 1,..........................., MO Li : Mil a 10. I sip lai 7.. VI\ iIV= i - .E er'f3;.::.:i 11 iiiIIM s',' .1 .....1,1::,e.:;i a iiii T. •,;,!q h Pig i;Age/ .1.4 -*I's ._a 111 ,,,,„...,1w .,z.... .. ,,,,, *.r....,,,....,.,...„= .._,,v .*.N....-1afs-,..,---,-- e .,-.;:o.i..:.,. I „....., . ......: 4,:i..-, - 7:6 - .14„...._ Avarisir..-% P4WIlremp "*"... " AF).-r.:4=' di ..i-W ity1, , ,IP ir.....i& ....w for.,•ipiiih.,01,7 7' ..,. 11.,;.:-::': I:•...... 4.%eM • .-H 7-1 , , i.ip-..1.__opt ,-..::::... .::..i....,::.... ..:::::.:;‘, tt:fr/17 il %::::' z V. y .,:. , v4,.;;:otirAvow.01, , „...,...:::_::.::::_,Ii ,,,„..,. _ , ...., ... ...,. ....= „ill; i ..- :,...,..... :::.:1. „:,._ . .._:,...„„.„,,„..,,, ,,:::Cilivillaill.. /....--- :"7:::::.,:,,„„ 'I- .................•-.., .11.,,,,, _,,,,, ‘,...:_ ik. .i.Pz.,:!•.--;-.•oo. id.....:....,,,,z.s„,,iii„,,,,,,, ogeow, ::< a .........,.,...ii , w.....,...e/ ... , um implir.::.;=...."4.!•1 V::::.A,::::." • ' a 1111.1%..i ............. i. M. 11:4:hal ' 11 lIns/-1:ii;i 5;•::'`-:'4 *.j4 4 • ..Nor se .04111W,L4 Vile".4w '-'111 -;'=.1.;.:-Vv;:::.2,.',-",f•••• AV/-`Pi4r4„111:Nows.‘'t-7 4#.likiellff A \ 1"" t.25 4wAtilaPPA 144111941,4=01. A11.111 to.—ill..,., -ir ... Ipe AAA A elmiam W,*.....,•er: .:.'.'.::: 4... nia•N"..T.0.• VIIPa PPir\• — 0•as or- i;R::., Sitliiiiii.._ Alii;F:----..vim int ii& Am •Vit04teise PP' J 1)3,1_EY q'9/ 6'' TOWN OF ORO VALLEY o`.• • 4):r7- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1, �Yr :, =� • Building Safety • Parks and Recreation ",r°rye; • Planning and Zoning • Transit Services it UN D ED September 9, 1998 Mr. Herbert Braun 2727 W. Tangerine Road Tucson, Arizona 85742 RE: Oro Valley Zoning Questions Dear Mr. Braun: After consultation with the Planning and Zoning Administrator, I have been able to find an answer to the questions you posed at our last meeting. Specifically, you asked about your ability to sell your property for a church use after annexation into Oro Valley. In a discussion with Mr. Bryant Nodine, our Planning and Zoning Administrator, we determined that the staff recommendation for translational zoning would include the ability to use the property for church uses. We would be allowed to make this recommendation under state law which permits us to translate zoning so that you are given no more rights than you presently enjoy. We would need a request in writing from you to make this recommendation to the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Town Council. If the church wished to file a development plan for review during the six months it takes to translate your zoning, Mr. Nodine confirmed that planning staff would review the request under the provisions of the Pima County Zoning Code. While this would involve consideration at the Development Review Board and Town Council, all County regulations would be used if the plans were filed during the interim period. I hope that this information answers your questions about Oro Valley and our zoning provisions. We look forward to working with you in the future. 1cerely, ilf Donald L. Ch i ld, AIC' Community Developmen Direc •r Town of Oro Valley FAnd ivid/dlc/letters/braun.ltr 4 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: May 5, 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL FROM: Steven Faaborg, Civil Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Ordinance No. (0)99- 36 , revising the speed limit for Woodburne Avenue between Arrowsmith Drive and Rancho Vistoso Boulevard. SUMMARY: An Ordinance was presented to the Town Council at the April 7, 1999 meeting which was intended to lower the speed limit to 25 mph on that portion of Woodburne Avenue between Arrowsmith Drive and Rancho Vistoso Boulevard. The Town Code, Chapter 11 Section 11-3-4I had previously read "Rancho Vistoso, Unit 7, Woodburne Avenue from Moore Road to Rancho Vistoso Boulevard: 35 mph". The Town Code lists all streets with speed limits of other than 25 mph, with Section 11-3-4Q stating "All other streets and roads 25 mph". Lowering the speed limit on Woodburne from Arrowsmith Drive to Rancho Vistoso Boulevard would require removing that portion from Section 11-3-4I, leaving the other portion of the street, which is intended to have a speed limit of 35 mph. This resulted in some confusion at the April 7 meeting. The Ordinance, reading "Woodburne Avenue from Moore Road to Arrowsmith Drive: 35 miles per hour" was changed to read 25 mph, which had the effect of lowering the speed limit on the wrong portion of Woodburne Avenue. This ordinance would correct that error. The phrase "Rancho Vistoso, Unit 7" has also been removed from the code as it is inaccurate and unnecessary. ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance No. (0)99- 36 , An ordinance of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona amending Chapter 11 Section 11-3-4 of the code of the Town of Oro Valley pertaining to speed limits and providing penalties for violations thereof. FISCAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATIONS OF STAFF: The Department of Public Works recommends approval of Ordinance (0)99- 36 , amending Chapter 11 Section 11-3-4I to read "Woodburne Avenue from Moore Road to Arrowsmith Drive: 35 miles per hour". T.--- TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION PAGE 2 OF 2 SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to approve Ordinance (0)99- 36 , amending Chapter 11 Section 11-3-4I to read "Woodburne Avenue from Moore Road to Arrowsmith Drive: 35 miles per hour". or I move to deny Ordinance (0)99-36 , amending Chapter 11 Section 11-3-4I to read "Woodburne Avenue from Moore Road to Arrowsmith Drive: 35 miles per hour". _ ,,,Azi4 k ' A-6.7 ierr)*'' /owA:6.15c„cX.,- LES,4.�u..s4cc Dep rtment H ad 7.,. &,. 2,„( _,1_..,. � Chi of Po i. e aeLc,24 Town anager ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-36 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA AMENDING CHAPTER 11 SECTION 11-3-4 OF THE CODE OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PERTAINING TO SPEED LIMITS AND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF WHEREAS, Chapter 11 Section 11-3-4 of the Oro Valley Town Code allows that either the Town Engineer or Chief of Police with the Approval of Council shall place and maintain traffic control devices deemed necessary to regulate traffic under the traffic laws of the town or state; and, WHEREAS, the portion of Woodburne Avenue between Arrowsmith Drive and Rancho Vistoso Boulevard has been recently opened to the public, and, WHEREAS, a review of current engineering standards and public safety concerns finds that the existing 35 mph speed limit is not appropriate, and, WHEREAS, Chapter 11 Section 11-3-4 of the Oro Valley Town Code lists those streets with speed limits other than 25 mph, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA: SECTION 1: That Chapter 11 Section 11-3-4I of the Town Code of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, is amended to read: Woodburne Avenue from Moore Road to Arrowsmith Drive: 35 miles per hour; SECTION 2: Any person found guilty of violating any provision to this Ordinance shall be guilty and shall be punished as provided by state law for the same or similar offenses. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this 5th day of Nay , 1999. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA Paul H. Loomis, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Kathryn E. Cuvelier, Town Clerk Dan L. Dudley, Town Attorney Date Date TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 5 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: May 5, 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Melissa Shaw, AICP, Planner II SUBJECT: ORDINANCE NO. (0)99- 37, AMENDMENTS TO THE 1996 GENERAL PLAN FOR 4 ACRES IN ORO VALLEY, KNOWN AS THE ALBEE PROPERTY, LOCATED SOUTHEAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF FIRST AVENUE AND PALISADES ROAD. BACKGROUND AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The Planning and Zoning Commission initiated an amendment to the General Plan on March 2, 1999 at the request of the property owner Maralyn Albee, and held a public hearing on April 6, 1999. Requests for General Plan amendments may be submitted twice a year, in February thru March and August thru September. The subject parcel is 4.009 acres in size, and is located in the new annexation area, west of La Cholla Boulevard and south of Tangerine Road. The recently approved translational zoning for this and the surrounding properties is R1-144. Access is via an unpaved road at the western end of Glover Road. It is surrounded on the north and east sides by school district property (the Wilson School), on the south side by an unpaved road and vacant property, and on the west by largely vacant property and one home (see the attached location map). The )roperty is in close proximity to a major wash, and has relatively minor topography. Currently on the site are three structures used as residences, and the unpaved road. School playing fields border the north and east sides. LANDOWNER'S RQUEST: The General Plan land use designation for this site is Parks/Open Space, with a backup designation of LDR 1.2. The original request was to change the land use designation to "a medium density (MDR) land use category" (the MDR land use designation permits 2.1 to 5.0 du/ac). The landowner asked the Commission during the April 6th hearing to continue this request in order to consider the low density residential, 1.2-2.0 du/ac, designation instead of medium density residential. The Commission declined to continue the item. GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE: Oro Valley Land Use Map and Policy Analysis: Oro Valley has designated this area as acceptable for park/open space, with a backup designation of low-density residential uses 1.2 (0.6 to 1.2 dwelling units per acre). Park/open space denotes areas that are "to be precluded from development except for public recreational facilities or nature preserves. Open space should be left in a natural state for scenic purposes due to topographic or drainage constraints or the need to provide buffers between potentially incompatible land uses". General plan backup designations are recommended"in the event that the use shown cannot be realized due to lack )f funding or other factors." The low density backup designation denotes areas " where single family residential development is desirable, but only if it is at a density that will permit retention of a rural, open character...clustering and building envelopes would be encouraged within this classification to ensure maximum protection of the Sonoran Desert and allocation of open space". TOWN OF ORO VALLEY c:OUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of4 The requested medium density residential designation permits 2.1 to 5.0 dwelling units per acres, and is "where typical single-family detached, townhouse, or patio home development is suitable...[t]hese areas should be located with proximity to schools, shopping and employment". Several General Plan policies are applicable in consideration of this request for an amendment. Based on the proximity of the site to the Wilson School, policies that promote locating residential development to school sites support the request for an amendment, as it is desirable to site schools with residential use. The LDR 1.2 - 2.0 du/ac designation would be a logical transition between the school and the LDR 0.5 - 1.2 designated property immediately to the south. Additionally, the fact that the site is not in a totally natural state, due to site disturbance and residences, and has infrastructure in place (water and sewer are on site) lessens its value as natural open space and supports higher density development. Conversely, the proximity of the site to a significant wash and potential wildlife habitat area supports the need for a low-density buffer between the school and sensitive land. Information on vegetation and wildlife habitat has not been made available, however, a site visit showed little disturbance on parcels around the site. Findings of Fact: As stated in "Focus 2020", the granting of a general plan amendment will be based on the following findings of fact: 1. That the amendment constitutes an overall improvement to the general plan and is not solely for the benefit of a particular landowner or owners at a particular point in time. Based on potential impacts to the open space and riparian area, a change to low density residential 1.2-2.0 will not constitute an overall improvement to the general plan. 2. That the amendment is consistent with the vision, goals, and policies of the general plan. The following goals and policies are relevant to this request. Policies 1.2A and 1.3I support the amendment,while the remainder do not. Policy 1.2A: "Encourage the location of residential neighborhoods close to activity centers to minimize travel times." The proximity of the site to the Wilson School supports a higher density land use classification. Policy 1.2D: "Institute complementary zoning near open space, parks, washes, trails, trailheads, schools, and recreation areas to provide adequate buffer." The underlying land use category LDR 0.6 to 1.2 provides adequate and sufficient buffer between the adjacent school site and wash area. A more intense category will generate additional traffic and may not provide adequate buffer to the wash. Policy 1.3I: "Ensure safe bike/pedestrian access to school sites from open space, parks and neighborhoods." The proximity of this site to the school ensures easy, safe pedestrian access. Policy 6.2B: "Open space preservation shall be used as a criterion in deciding the approval or denial of land use rezoning proposals." For value as preserved open space, given that the site is already partially disturbed, the primary benefit is that it will provide a buffer between the school and potential park/open space site and additional low density residential. That the general plan land use map does not provide appropriate optional sites for the use proposed in the amendment. The land use map does provide other sites appropriate for medium density residential land uses. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 3 of4 4. That the amendment will not adversely impact the community as a whole, or a portion of the community without an acceptable means of mitigating these impacts through the subsequent zoning and development process. The requested low-density residential 1.2-2.0 designation may adversely impact the open space and riparian area to the west, due to the potential density of up to 8 homes on the site. Mitigation such as clustering may not provide sufficient protection of the wash and open space at this density. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ACTION: The Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on April 6, 1999, and moved to recommend denial of the proposed amendment changing the land use designation from Park/Open Space, with a backup designation of LDR 0.6-1.2, to MDR. The motion passed with a 5-0 vote. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Because of the presence of the wash to the west and uncertainty of the impact of higher density development on the wash, staff cannot support a recommendation to change the General Plan land use designation. Planning staff recommends that the Town Council retain the current land use designation of park/open space and the backup designation LDR 0.6-1.2 for the Albee property. ;UGGESTED MOTION: The Council may wish to consider the following motions: I move not to adopt Ordinance No. (0)99-37 , Amendments to the 1996 General Plan, and to retain the General Plan land use designation park/open space designation and the backup designation LDR 0.5-1.2 for that parcel known as the Albee property. OR I move to adopt Ordinance No. (0)99- 37 , Amendments to the 1996 General Plan changing the land use designation from park/open space designation and the backup designation LDR 0.5-1.2 to MDR 2.1-5.0. OR I move to adopt Ordinance No. (0)99- 37 , Amendments to the 1996 General Plan changing the land use designation from park/open space designation and the backup designation LDR 0.5-1.2 to . ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ordinance No. (0)99- 37 2. April 6, 1999 letter from Maralyn Albee 3. Exhibit A: Current General Plan Land Use Map and Site Location 4. Excerpt of Minutes from the April 6, 1999 Planning and Zoning Commission Hearing TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 7OUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 4 of4 F:PROJECTS\GP\AMDTS\ALBEETC.RPT lam , 1 . Milil Z ni : ' inistrator i1 i, , I �� ` C ity D o/ ent 1 irect• Of ..of 4 ' -4 Town Manag- ORDINANCE NO. (0)99- 37 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE LAND USE MAP OF THAT DOCUMENT KNOWN AS "FOCUS 2020: TOWN OF ORO VALLEY GENERAL PLAN, JULY 1996"; FIXING THE EFFECTIVE DATE THEREOF; AND REPEALING ANY OTHER ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH. WHEREAS, the Town of Oro Valley adopted a document known as the "Focus 2020: Town Of Oro Valley General Plan, July 1996"; and WHEREAS, it has become necessary to revise, amend and update this document due to a request for an alternate land use for is 4.009 acres located in the new annexation area, west of La Cholla Boulevard and south of Tangerine Road, and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, having considered an amendment to the Land Use Map of the Town of Oro Valley General Plan relative to the appropriate land use designation for that property known as the Albee property; and having held a public hearing on said map amendment; and having made its recommendations to the Town Council that the land use designation not be changed from Parks Open Space to Low Density Residential 1.2 - 2.0; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY: SECTION 1. The Council hereby adopts a revised Land Use Map as a part of that certain document known as " Focus 2020: Town of Oro Valley General Plan, July 1996". Said map revision shall reflect a land use designation Low Density Residential 1.2 - 2.0 on that property known as the Albee property, as shown in Exhibit A. Three copies of the revised Land Use Map of said document are on file in the office of the Town Clerk of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona. SECTION 2. The effective date of the revised Land Use Map shall be thirty days after the adoption of this ordinance by the Town Council. SECTION 3. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of the ordinance or any part of the Land Use Map amendment adopted herein is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. SECTION 4. That all ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be repealed to the extent of such conflict. PASSED AND ADOPTED by Mayor Ma or and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this 5th day of May, 1999. Paul H. Loomis, Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Dan Dudley, Town Attorney 10. 0 I L W H- Cl) 1z J LIJ 1 --- c.) -,-r , - = , CY 5 1 LU , 1 CC: , i i--! oni 1 i z 1 E 8-1 LL.1! U 1 1I E 0 i 1 0 zA k �� =! C iiii#0... .'7 LIJ a. LLI ._ ,...N,.:..:,=.:,:i.i:, o_ Me: livi9,-!,.,,,,,; 1 ,<- �or'9'txi^l amid iaP 3 ,. �,.•: W . , CO— = Q' 1 _I u) I a_1 Q 1 ____1 _____ _ tos tep ersiA —Q1 CC i 1 LUi i 44.3 RP wed LU LD .L In O 1 MST Rano mi. iv MAY119 1.r.j LMMIV.Eft c. 1. -'t trIcrr REAM acres e . April 6. 1999 Oro Valley Planning&Zoning 11000 N.La Canada Dr. Oro Valley, AZ 85742 To Whom It May Concern. The Objective of this letter is to change my original request from a medium density to an LDR 1.2—2.0 dwelling units per acre as suggested to me as an alternative by your Commission. This seems to be a more logical and practical plan for this acreage. This density is more in keeping with Oro Valley's over all plan of protecting the environment. I would like to ask for a continuance to consider this new request. Thank you. Sincerely, Maralvn Albee -_ PLANNING ,,,P'..,,, 1 - _ - - -I 1-\`• I I 1 • i I i • 1 ..._.t 1t ... .r. ` \ -. - 1OT1017....:-S1._.-......1 ..t.,-,-•/. I \ 1 • ‘ 1 MASTER PlarrrrED CCMMUrIIrr BACK UP:ESIGN-:T;C;.: • I I , rt/i •II 1 i 71._:. 1 I 1 t• 1`` i il 1 • I,1 `f.^ a-Loa ; . MCR r ; 1_ I - /��J 1 1 L^ �. 'a I;-LCR ,\..'-�' I. I t OR t / r /t ; .;r. ' ----- LDR. ,'.,' *-., ` N MOA i=�/ t PRE-ANNEXATION AGPE=:AENTS ,` Ili t\1...\. 2 r LCR i } -%,g Icilcwing -e-Anr.s�a:::n,',greener's-.a,,a,...- ,,, Y; I:t ' .;:, i % r, �'• S anterec into cy;he.c:'rr.;t Cro Vailey ':j MGR c t r 1 � , III Moa j �1 1 j r PAO WI Cvinn^ierc:a,.,i'r-OR.!ACP. C .;' !�A ii `E;_ Moa ...`c�/'I I ,,;" i j ! ® PAD..vi GR?,Ccr-=-rc:al ..-i',. / Ii1 �� • �`�GR! • I._. J ?.aC':�l r.t�.P C. jai LGR 1,tDR l / ..;( O ' © ;' ii r , :__.::. .. . :- y STATE `•J Cc-,rnarc:al ( URBAN GP.OWT :Ct;�DARY 1/ i'► P°S ;'�' • "s- P,es r PARK (r' ' _ '` �E�• t G ='=_ ''_'ti` I LA CHOLLA AIRPARK SPECIAL PLANNING:.rPDA MOORE ROAD "I.-----'I -- ' It'---•�''' `:/ 0 nom -_ i^e Ecurcar/or this_;a-...^q area,s.ra C:.-= (�mcLDA ;•c 't:::;;z�' Zone icr atrocr,traffic...LOR .R-1..CP/ A ..,..,, ; .; MDR . / R-LCA ' t.2 20 MOR • • ,f.:_ i SPECIAL CONDITIONS I R-LOR r-- OCR, I''j;:�f_--= 1, _ _ _ „r E ITE ', (i.3;D+ . L P5?`� r' _ 1�� J AIlowaole uses?irr;-_;_;t�cse r.--- V ,__.._. III / '-u;(-.1 w,A 1r a 1 ' t� �+ i ses!irritea:o arcs_ t t,.,��}. ; � a small scala TANGERINE ROAD ■ 1''•_�_ 11/ / ' WI�TQ _ Y. - , . ,.'2 arc -_3-L- - : --- _ il �' / It_2 I`"` LGR___ . ,`1.•/ 1 ,-J , I"�: - '\ r j yr SI 5C -5 _ +x:_3'b---.. __ =,•LCA �/-A-1-�,i.. .�1 Cnl 0 - r-' �- ,t I �- (.IPC ADR % 1 ^��I -I_�?.?1 - tAGP/'`I i �-.;// t i1"1 ADVISORY NOTICE �5.tAl _�•ICR r,1 I �J , t `ter'.f �::a• :i ,. ;/ -3'dnc�Si�25:C�r.3JCR .-•.__S.-a7._a:�=i-__--..�- -_• - __ 285:cna::CIS-'ai:r�3./-•: .3=8^• Vr1RA1V,lA DRIVE 1 �:1-Pi• " i/!.1c -i ( -.. �L:'� •�,_ 'rV �, :acvcrs,acarc:-�arc. -_iS9:r-�55:_.4---5:---- _' I I. Gn-- t „L.._ := Oy' �1r•/ ermilerr.4rt:E.•4'4r:0.:a ...sl::3 V2.1:41_ v-7.r.rt:ccrnazcr. :a:. :.C£ ` 1 I r'f f �� �=y.,--.x..-..-.z.� �� ::,Inc_...a==•:152C..ar=•._.c• v.:a:::. i /-•--. =! MCR i (1 1 lo_• . "� _ -a i LSA .'/ ;g ,; t \�/ V ;\� .--7--.2.71: .r' _i: f I /+ _ ;'• . ---' I/`rACP` l? C?r • - -; il c. _C7 �.�� /.CPI j ����� .,--.-=.7 I - -•'•:!';-r±-'n fart.= Ate'.'".� _:rbicE:ii LANE 1� _�' _.� . •', ' r=,,.a, ,'" •;,��-� �' - � 1 RL.R /, I_-=, I 2.]i :•-a; 1 ' :!\t MCR.'`L'/j_ ! .,,, •, - .-- -.2 /I C •-1 r`.� ' HCR'--.f.10A. 1 1 .R i .-AGR ! \ ;,>� - ;C.,\\‘‘'': ` !,i f . // MGA _b.'"'I^__, 1• 1. •L1�1_G?R LGAai_;� �.', /= ' • t I•R�ri '1: .2' yr;j.�• ti • / I .i • �� • / JtG=i t i� Lfr ?ca i .� D'a I/:. C,1 0 � Loa � I _ � 'LINDA VISTA 3L0 '-CP � 1.2 �' c- ' i \ MOR / ._ I a-LD __ ; ..iii :1 -� \ �r l _ OVERTON ROAD MOR StC= ! ^s LGR i rq �o'- ty 4 _/ > !eoa MCP. \I' ,.z Ps� :,cA-- y _ J `\\�\'///;��/ , ;• UDR . LOA1. 2 OR C--• LOR'1I \.�. - , -.^- -.1�' 1 �t 1. ,if ., ,`ADR 1.2 P.cG 1- PiPpy..0A0--- .Cr;-- 1,J r....7_. 14tioalI -- t: «tnrc?�' u,t '� •'J1l E7).,'",':�I 1 .„dHOR ,'. MCR ,_yF ;.C:I, ., :f •..P. 1 ;:,i6ii _kiCR 1 th+oa::::.,,'I.. .I ; i.. 0 A r,4 . ,1 .2 _ ,:„F---: -1 t ':?r MHOR '/J ( -r-- `.. )1 1 1 �t '2 �,-.:r II./ '.1F+C \I.•�,A =.-.A = C:• 1_227 I ••,,,..2,-. ' 3 _E.CO IDARY P1 ANNI NG -1,=-1,..,, r0- f= 1.2 on rci*,\,,fnn _ �,� �; I MGF I-=-C y' LCR w- �,r2 "~ : t .:,_ -. s`7 t.2 c 1 , INA ROAD I ' -'-T.7 a ►' = 11 1 - _ ' , it I ' r MOR y ® CLCR /� iI - _ _ CI ',.a/ ,no -> I i i,F_ - _, •i .,C Ic (•'1.. ca ,-,--1,---.-_,..,/ � c :'/ I < _ \,:,..,,,...:_„....,.GROVE -• S ... ( ,- PLANNING AREA _ r ��� , I y/ -3 y ... - . I \% I F1'I _ TOWN of URO VALLEY GENERAL ..,_ .P L A \I- L A -n 1 IR-LCR RURAL LOW DENSITY RESIOGITIAL MPCI MASTER PLANNED COMMUNITIES 'CS I ?.ARKS/OPEN SPACE (0-0.301.liac) 1LOR 1 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL MI REGIONAL COMMERCIAL .5"=') SCHOOLS o.s (0.4-0.5 DU/ac) 1 LoR 1 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL II COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL -• TRANSMISSION LIME 1 1.2 J (0.6-1.2 DU/ac) 1lCR LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL a __! ...AILNEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ,� TOWN BOUNDARY . 2.0 (1.3-2.0 DU/act I ti,IpR MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL OFFICE 1 RESORT (2.1-5.0 DU/ac) i ..•." i. F5ii: MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL :.cp,: COMMERCE PARK 3 j- '_ 3 2 -= U/act...' (5.1-10.0 DE.2,•_.=, 't -== EllHIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL '-s?' ?'JBLIC,SEP/MI PUBLIC 110.OU/HCl MARCH 2, 1999 MINUTES, P&Z COMMISSION MEETING 16 PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED MOTION: Moved/Seconded (Moody/Wiant) and carried by a 6-0 vote to approve translational zoning from Pima County SR to Oro Valley R1-144 and Exhibit "A" and the additional condition is that access be limited as a temporary access and it may be closed as the Tangerine Corridor is developed. PUBLIC HEARING: OV9-99-95 COFFINGER, OV9-99-107 STENSTROM, and OV9-99-108 STENSTROM, TRANSLATIOINAL ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY SR TO ORO VALLEY R1-144 WITH LIVESTOCK ENTITLEMENTS, EXHIBIT "A": 1. Pima County Standards shall apply to all livestock and horse facilities and activities. 2. Any expansion of the existing livestock and horse facilities shall be in conformance with the requirements of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised. Specifically, any additional clearing or grading (including the expansion of livestock areas) of more than 1000 square feet shall require a Type I grading permit. PUBLIC HEARING OPENED No speakers. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED MOTION: Moved/Seconded (Wiant/Moody) and carried by a 6-0 vote to approve OV9-99-95, OV9-99-107 and OV9-99-108, Translational Zoning from Pima County SR to Oro Valley R1-144 with Livestock Entitlements and all conditions listed in Exhibit "A": PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION, CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL, OV9-99-95 COFFINGER, OV9-99-107 AND OV9-99-108 STENSTROM. 1. Pima County Standards shall apply to all livestock and horse facilities and activities. 2. Any expansion of the existing livestock and horse facilities shall be in conformance with the requirements of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised. Specifically, any additional clearing or grading (including the expansion of livestock areas) of more than 1000 square feet shall require a Type I grading permit. 10. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST TO AMEND THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY GENERAL PLAN FOR THAT AREA KNOWN AS THE ALBEE PROPERTY Mr. Nodine, AICP summarized that the Planning and Zoning Commission initiated an amendment to the General Plan on March 2, at the request of the property owner, Maralyn Albee. Requests for General Plan amendments may be submitted twice a year, in February through March and August through September. Mr. Nodine, AICP explained that the subject parcel is 4.009 acres in size, and is located in the new annexation area, west of La Cholla Boulevard and south of Tangerine Road. . The pending translational zoning for this and the surrounding properties is from SR to R1-144. Access is via an unpaved road at the MARCH 2, 1999 MINUTES,P&Z COMMISSION MEETING 17 western end of Glover Road. It is surrounded on the north and east sides by school district property (the Wilson School), on the south side by an unpaved road and vacant property, and on the west by largely vacantroperty and one home (see the attached location map). The property is in close proximity to a p major wash, and has relatively minor topography. Currently on the site are three structures used as residences, and the unpaved road. School playing fields border the north and east sides Mr. Nodine, AICP stated that the request from the property owner is to change the General Plan land use designation from Parks/Open Space, with a backup designation of LDR 1.2, to "a medium density land use category". The medium density land use designation permits 2.1 to 5.0 du/ac. Mr. Nodine, AICP explained to the Commission that the Town of Oro Valley has designated this area as acceptable for park/open space, with a backup designation of low-density residential uses 1.2 (0.6 to 1.2 dwelling units per acre). Park/open space denotes areas that are "to be precluded form development except for public recreational facilities or nature preserves. Open space should be left in a natural state for scenic purposes due to topographic or drainage constraints or the need to provide buffers between potentially incompatible land uses". Mr. Nodine, AICP reported that the General plan backup designations are recommended "in the event that the use shown cannot be realized due to lack of funding or other factors." The low density backup designation denotes areas " where single family residential development is desirable, but only if it is at a density that will permit retention of a rural, open character...clustering and building envelopes would be encouraged within this classification to ensure maximum protection of the Sonoran Desert and allocation of open space". The requested medium density residential designation permits 2.1 to 5.0 dwelling units per acres, and is "where typical single-family detached, townhouse, or patio home development is suitable...these areas should be located with proximity to schools, shopping and employment". Mr. Nodine, AICP stated that several General Plan policies are applicable in consideration of this request for an amendment. Based on the proximity of the site to the Wilson School, policies that promote locating residential development to school sites support the request for an amendment, as it is desirable to site schools with residential use. Additionally, the fact that the site is not in a totally natural state, due to site disturbance and residences, and has infrastructure in place (water and sewer are on site) lessens its value as natural open space and supports higher density development. Conversely, the proximity of the site to a significant wash andotential wildlife habitat area supports the need for a low density buffer between the school and sensitive p land. Information on vegetation and wildlife habitat has not been made available, however, a site visit showed little disturbance on parcels around the site. Findings of Fact: As stated in"Focus 2020", the granting of a general plan amendment will be based on the following findings of fact: 1. That the amendment constitutes an overall improvement to the general plan and is not solely for the benefit of a particular landowner or owners at a particular point in time. Based on potential impacts to the open space and riparian area, a change to medium density residential will not constitute an overall improvement to the general plan. 2. That the amendment is consistent with the vision, goals, and policies of the general plan. MARCH 2, 1999 MINUTES,P&Z COMMISSION MEETING 18 The following goals and policies are relevant to this request. Policies 1.2A and 1.3I support the amendment, while the remainder do not. Policy .12A: "Encourage the location of residential neighborhoods close to activity centers to minimize travel times." The proximity of the site to the Wilson School supports a higher density land use classification. Policy 1.2D: "Institute complementary zoning near open space, parks, washes, trails, trailheads, schools, and recreation areas to provide adequate buffer." The underlying land use category LDR 0.6 to 1.2 provides adequate and sufficient buffer between the adjacent school site and wash area. A more intense category will generate additional traffic and may not provide adequate buffer to the wash. Policy 1.3I: "Ensure safe bike/pedestrian access to school sites from open space, parks and neighborhoods." The proximity of this site to the school ensures easy, safe pedestrian access. Policy 6.2B: "Open space preservation shall be used as a criterion in deciding the approval or denial of land use rezoning proposals." For value as preserved open space, given that the site is already partially disturbed,the primary benefit is that it will provide a buffer between the school and potential park/open space site and additional low density residential. 3. That the general plan land use map does not provide appropriate optional sites for the use proposed in the amendment. The land use map does provide other sites appropriate for medium density residential land uses. 4. That the amendment will not adversely impact the community as a whole, or a portion of the community without an acceptable means of mitigating these impacts through the subsequent zoning and development process. The requested medium-density residential designation may adversely impact the open space and riparian area to the west,due to the potential density of up to 20 homes on the site. Mitigation such as clustering would not provide sufficient protection of the wash and open space at this density. Mr. Nodine, AICP stated that the Planning staff recommended that the Planning and Zoning Commission forward the proposed General Plan amendment to the Town Council with a recommendation to retain the current land use designation of park/open space and the backup designation LDR 0.5-1.2. An alternative to the medium density request would be to change the designation to LDR, 1.2 - 2.0 dwelling units per acre. This designation would be a logical transition between the school and the LDR 0.5 - 1.2 designated property immediately to the south. However, because of the presence of the wash to the west and uncertainty of the impact of higher density development on the wash, staff cannot support a recommendation to change the General Plan land use designation. Mrs. Albee presented a letter to Chair Douglas, stating that she would like to amend her previous request and change the designation of the Albee property. Mr. Nodine, AICP stated that in light of the amended request and the fact that there is a wash located on the property in question, staff could no longer recommend that this request to amend the General Plan be forwarded to the Town Council. Chair Douglas asked Mrs. Albee if she would like to speak, Mrs. Albee declined. PUBLIC HEARING OPENED MARCH 2, 1999 MINUTES,P&Z COMMISSION MEETING 19 Bill Adler, 10720 N. Eagle Eye, stated that the burden should be placed upon the applicant to prove that the findings allow for General Plan amendments. Clearly, even though the applicant has requested to change the density, number three on the requirements will never be met. He stated that the staff report does not state why number three has been met. Barbara Smith, 13600 N. Como Drive, expressed her concern that Oro Valley is approving all these changes while there is still a court case pending. Linda Goodwillie, opposed to the proposed change in the General Plan. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED MOTION: Moved/Seconded (Moody/Partridge) and carried by a 5-0 vote to deny a request to amend the Town of Oro Valley General Plan for that area known as the Albee property, located in the new annexation area,west of La Cholla Boulevard and south of Tangerine Road. 11. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST TO AMEND THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY GENERAL PLAN FOR THAT AREA KNOWN AS THE WINCHESTER PROPERTY Mr.Nodine, AICP reported that the Planning and Zoning Commission initiated an amendment to the General Plan on March 2, 1999 at the request of the property owners, Ken and Iva Winchester. Requests for General Plan amendments may be submitted twice a year, in February through March and August through September. Mr. Nodine, AICP explained that the subject parcel is 3.909 acres in size, located near the intersection of First Avenue and Palisades Road, approximately 250 feet east of First Avenue. The current zoning is R1- 144. It is part of the 1995 annexation area known as the "Palisades Parcel Splits". Palisades Road borders the north property side, a Rural Metro Fire station and R1-144 zoned vacant property the west, and the east and south sides are bounded by developed and vacant residential property zoned R1-36. It is important to note that although the zoning is R1-36 for 10 of the 12 parcels in the annexation area, restrictions do not allow parcels less than 1.01 acres in size. Mr. Nodine, AICP stated that the site is vacant and undisturbed with the exception of an unpaved 2-track road, and it contains substantial slopes (hillside development zone standards may apply). There are no identified protected riparian areas on the site however, the topography indicates minor drainages may be present. Mr. Nodine, AICP summarized that the landowners are requesting a General Plan amendment to change the land use designation from Rural Low Density Residential(0-0.3 DU/Acre) to Low Density residential (LDR 0.6-1.2 Du/ac). Mr. Nodine, AICP stated that in regards to the General Plan, Oro Valley has designated this area as acceptable for rural low-density residential uses(R-LDR). The Plan denotes "areas of large lot single family development ...desirable in a rural environment". This is the lowest intensity land use designation category in the General Plan, with density from 0-0.3 dwelling units per acre, and is identified as an "area where there is a desire to retain a rural lifestyle or where protection of the natural environment is necessary". The Rural TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 6 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: May 5, 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Melissa Shaw, AICP, Planner II ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-38 SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: AMENDMENTS TO THE 1996 GENERAL PLAN FOR 3.909 ACRES IN ORO VALLEY, KNOWN AS THE WINCHESTER PROPERTY, LOCATED SOUTHEAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF FIRST AVENUE AND PALISADES ROAD: REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE BACKGROUND: This request to amend the General Plan was initiated by the Planning and Zoning Commission on March 2, 1999 at the request of the property owners, Ken and Iva Winchester. The Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on the amendment request April 6, 1999, and moved to recommend denial. Since the Commission hearing, the applicant has requested that this item be continued to the May 19th Council meeting. The reason for the continuance is so that the engineer representing the property owners can inform the owners of the status of the case, and to prepare their justification regarding the"Findings of Fact"as set out in the General Plan. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Planning staff recommends that this case be continued to the May 19th Council meeting to allow time for the property owners to be informed of Planning Commission action. SUGGESTED MOTION: The Council may wish to consider the following motion: I move to continue Amendments to the 1996 General Plan changing the land use designation on the Winchester property from R-LDR to LDR(0.6— 1.2 DU/ac)to the May 19th, 1999 Town Council hearing. ATTACHMENT: 1. Request for continuance F:PROJECTS\GP\AMDTS\winchestertc l.RPT ,'1. ing Zoni it g nistrator 1 Zi, l 0A ;,/ ,,, ,I /l /► C• - ity 1�De - •,• D.rector 41:4 ffif / Aar. / , ,..gow' 411 IV WA/ Town Manager Haien° M. Koski. President Stephan Moos, Arch, Vice-President Frank H Koski, PE, RLS. Vice-PrestO,int Architects & Engineers, Inc. April 26, 1999 Town of Oro Valley Community Development Department 11000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley, AZ 85737 Attn: Melissa Shaw,AICP Planner II Re: Winchester Property 220-06-00406 Request a 30-day continuance on this General Plan Amendment application_ The owner is considering her options and wishes the continuance. Sincerely, ri F. H. Koski Vice President mud 199 East Fort Lowell Road Tucson, Arizona 85705 (520) 887-6003 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: May 5, 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING — APPROVAL OF APPLICATION OF SERIES 10 (BEER & WINE) LIQUOR LICENSE — GIANT CONVENIENCE STORE AND GAS STATION #6813, 12885 NORTH ORACLE ROAD SUMMARY: An application by Carlos Guerra has been submitted for a Series 10 beer and wine liquor license at the Giant Convenience Store and gas station under construction at 12885 North Oracle Road. In accordance with Section 4-201 of the Arizona Revised Statutes, the application was posted for 20 days commencing April 12, 1999 on the premises of the applicant's property. No protests were received during that time. Chief Wolff has conducted a background investigation on the applicants. He has found no derogatory information on the applicants, therefore, he has no objections to the approval of the Series 10 liquor license. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Liquor License Application 2. Memorandum from Police Department SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to approve the request for a Series 10 liquor license for Giant Convenience Store and Gas Station, 12885 North Oracle Road. Cr. 6.4.4kit-te.; !/ I .. • ent -.I Town M. ager ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR LICENSES & CONTROL 4,1i2Z • . . 800 W Washington 5th Floor ' :T_r F�r.... 400 W Congress#150 Phoenix AZ 85007-2934 45q Tucson AZ 85701-1352 (602) 542-5141 . s �}= R '._ '(520) 628-6595 APPLICATION FOR LIQUOR LICENSE TYPE OR PRINT WITH BLACK INK Notice: Effective Nov.1,1997,All Owners,Agents,Partners,Stockholders,Officers.or Managers actively involved in the day to day operations of the business must attend a Department approved liquor law training course or provide proof of attendance within the last five years. See page 5 of the Liquor Licensing requirements. SECTION 1 This application is for a: SECTION 2 Type of ownership: ❑INTERIM PERMIT Complete Section 5 ❑J.T.W.R.O.S. Complete Section 6 ®NEW LICENSE Complete Sections 2,3,4,13,14,15,16,17 0 INDIVIDUAL Complete Section 6 ❑PERSON TRANSFER(Bars&Liquor Stores ONLY) 0 PARTNERSHIP Complete Section 6 Complete Sections 2,3,4,11,13,15,16,17 ❑CORPORATION Complete Section 7 ❑LOCATION TRANSFER(Bars and Liquor Stores ONLY) 0 LIMITED LIABILITY CO. Complete Section 7 Complete Sections 2,3,4,12,13,15,16,17 0 CLUB Complete Section 8 ❑ PROBATEJWILL ASSIGNMENT/DIVORCE DECREE 0 GOVERNMENT Complete Section 10 Complete Sections 2,3,4,9,13,15,17(fee not required) 0 TRUST Complete Section 6 ❑GOVERNMENT Complete Sections 2,3,4,10,13,15,16,17 0 OTHER Explain SECTION 3 Type of license and fees: LICENSE#: t O l C) ( C 1. Type of License: i n 2.Total fees attached $ 100.00 APPLICATION FEE AND INTERIM PERMIT FEES (IF APPLICABLE)ARE NOT REFUNDABLE. A service fee of$25.00 will be charged for all dishonored checks(A.R.S.44.6852) SECTION 4 Applicant:(All applicants must complete this section) Mr. 1. Applicant/Agent's NamQ.. Guerra Carlos Antonio (Insert one name ONLY to appear on license) Last First Middle 2. Corp./Partnership/L.L.C.: Gi ant Industries Arizona, Inc., an Arizona Corporation (Exactly as it appears on Articles of Inc.or Articles of Org.) 3. Business Name: Giant #6813 (Exactly as it appears on the exterior of premises) 4. Business Address: 12885 N. Oracle Rd. Oro Valley Pima 85737 (Do not use PO Box Number) City COUNTS Zip 5. Business Phone: ( 602 ) 585-8888 Residence Phone: ( ) N/A 6. Is the business located within the incorporated limits of the above city or town? ®YES ONO 7. Mailing Address: P.O. Box 12999 Scottsdale AZ 85267 City State Zip 8. Enter the amount paid for a 06,07,or 09 license: $ (Price of License ONLY) DEPARTMENT USE ONLY C .AcceP Y ted b : c C... Date: Lic.# 1 1 I(fir Fees: 0 '' $ OO Application Interim Permit Agent Change Club F.Prints TOTAL PROCESSING APPLICATIONS TAKES APPROXIMATELY 90 DAYS,AND CIRCUMSTANCES OFTEN RESULT INA LONGER WAITING PERIOD. You ARE CAUTIONED REGARDING PLANS FORA GRAND OPENING,ETC.,BEFORE FINAL APPROVAL AND ISSUANCE OF THE LICENSE. LIC 010011/1998 *Disabled individuals requiring special accommodation,please call the Department. SECTION 5 Interim Permit: intend to operate business whileyour application is pending you will need an Interim Permit pursuant to A.R.S.4-203.01. 1. If you p PP Z. There MUST be a valid license of the same type you are applying for currently issued to the location. 3. Enter the license number currently at the location. 4.. Is the license currently in use?0 YES 0 NO If no,how long has it been out of use? ATTACH THE LICENSE CURI1ENTLY ISSUED AT THE LOCATION TO THIS APPLICATION. I, ,declare that I am the CURRENT LICENSEE of the stated license and (Print full name) location. I have read this application and the contents and all statements are true,correct and complete. X ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME (Signature) this day of Day of Month Month Year My commission expires on: (Signature of NOTARY PUBLIC) SECTION 6 Individual or Partnership Owners: EACH PERSON LISTED MUST SUBMIT A COMPLETED FORM "LIC0101", AN "APPLICANT" TYPE FINGERPRINT CARD, AND $24 FEE FOR EACH CARD. 1. Individual: Last First Middle %Owned Residence Address City State Zip %a Partnership Name:(Only the first partner listed will appear on license) General-Limited Last First Middle %Owned Residence Address City State Zip ❑ ❑ % ❑ ❑ % ❑ ❑ % ❑ ❑ %O (ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEET IF NECESSARY) other than the above,goingto share in the profits/losses of the business? 0 YES 0 NO 2. Is any person, • - SECTION 7 Corporation/Limited Liability Co.: EACH PERSON LISTED MUST SUBMIT A COMPLETED FORM "LIC0101", AN "APPLICANT" TYPE FINGERPRINT CARD, AND $24 FEE FOR EACH CARD. ® CORPORATION Complete questions 1,2,3,5,6, 7,8. ❑ L.L.C. Complete questions 1,2,4,5,6, 7 and attach copy of Articles of Org.and Operation Agreement 1. Name of Corporation/L.L.C.: Giant Industries Arizona, Inc., an Arizona Corporation (Exactly as it appears on Articles dim or Articles of Org.) 2. Date Incorporated/Organized: 1-1-69 State where Incorporated/Organi7ed: Arizona 3. AZ Corporation Commission File No.: 074717-4 Date authorized to do business in AZ: 4. AZ L.L.C.File No: Date authorized to do business in AZ: 5. Is Corp./L.L.C.non-profit? ❑YES ®NO If yes,give IRS tax exempt number: 6. List all directors/officers in Corporation/L.L.C.: Last First Middle Title Residence Address City State Zip Please See Attached List (ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEET IF NECESSARY) 7. List stockholders or controlling members owning 10%or more: T ast First Middle %Owned Residence Address City State Zip Please ScPAttached List (ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEET IF NECESSARY) 8. If the corporation/L.L.C.is owned by another entity,attach an ownership,and director/officer/members disclosure for the parent entity. Attach additional sheets as necessary in order to disclose real people. SECTION 8 Club Applicants: EACH PERSON LISTED MUST SUBMIT A COMPLETED FORM "LIC0101", AN "APPLICANT" TYPE FINGERPRINT CARD, AND $24 FEE FOR EACH CARD. 1. Name of Club: Date Chartered: (Exactly as it appears on Club Charter) (Attach a copy of Club Charter) 2. Is club non-profit? ❑YES 0 NO If yes,give IRS tax exempt number: 3. List officer and directors: Last Fust Middle Title Residence Address City State Zip (ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEET IF NECESSARY) 3ECTION 9 Probate,Will Assignment or Divorce Decree of an existing Bar or Liquor Store: 9 L Current Licensee's Name: First Middle Exactly as it appears on license) Last a. Assignee's Name: Middle Last First 3. License Type: License Number. Date of Last Renewal: 4., ATTACH TO THIS APPLICATION A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE WILL, PROBATE DISTRIBUTION INSTRUMENT, OR DIVORCE DECREE THAT SPECIFICALLY DISTRIBUTES THE LIQUOR LICENSE TO THE ASSIGNEE TO THIS APPLICATION. SECTION 10 Government: (for cities,towns, or counties only) 1. Person to administer this license: Last First Middle 2. Assignee's Name: Last First Middle A SEPARATE LICENSE MUST BE OBTAINED FOR EACH PREMISES FROM WHICH SPIRITUOUS LIQUOR IS SERVED. SECTION 11 Person to Person Transfer: Questions to be completed by CURRENT LICENSEE(Bars and Liquor Stores ONLY). 1. Current Licensee's Name: Entity: (Exactly as it appears on license) Last First Middle (Indiv.,Agent,etc.) 2. Corporation/L.L.C.Name: (Exactly as it appears on license) 3. Current Business Name: (Exactly as it appears on license) 4. Current Business Address: 5. License Type: License Number: I ast Renewal Date: 6. Current Mailing Address(other than business): 7. Have all creditors,lien holders,interest holders,etc.been notified of this transfer? 0 YES 0 NO 8. Does the applicant intend to operate the business while this application is pending? 0 YES ❑NO If yes,complete section 5,attach fee,and current license to this application. hereby relinquish myrights to the above described license to the applicant named in this application and hereby declare that the statements 9. I he y q � made in this section are true,correct and complete. I, ,declare that I am the CURRENT LICENSEE,of the stated license. I have read this (Print full name) application and the contents and all statements are true,correct and complete. x ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME (Signature of CURRENT LICENSEE) this day of Day of Month Month Year My commission expires on: (Signature of NOTARY PUBLIC) a . • co____ Cn , • --.. , •-••3,§,iis iliiimeg-0 IliVitinitri410 , k.,04,"1:1,1'..,,•.,',*At:,}ii,• ,i;iii,'•kif,•W411_14,34 . 0 ;10::•,'414:c1.,',14.44,FAIS."11.NI• A.=i?,,N:•••=0„t'‘,s,OF ,-- Vi:Pi!,ttIMPTO.,aik.'4 E/04.414,1allnitti41.)'-'1 .460,111,NIFIT. , '' -7 •r•titl.,, 1:4,34;girit+-17.11It 1"41*,114141igigitt. A 7 1 i(1'.:-1t-)R ,::>i, ‘• . . igp-',,,,,,,''"'foxtpdp_.-1-140fitw,...ntitin•E', ,,,,,-0,..,-;.,,,,••5,.,,.-.-,...IiihopNi .44.....!,.t w.,,i I ..4 ,, .. -Z.c4V.:1 I Qi • .--. 7;z:1•5:tie?:... -.; .>4-'titaitclh,:-•-..!1,t, i,I,.,i.,1 7 1 1 i.j . c . .wea.,,.. ...__1„,,r,..,:,,.•.'.111gcsi-,--,,roi,:r ...,.1'.! f:',.il r i„. U 0 ,.,.. ..07..,,,,rplic.:-.F,y.:.;,..n,':,..,,•,r1,,p,,,,,Keixi.- 4,,,g ,1.i - C •- tUZiliTiiibArkElect!;$11',!.-10,q51. 4.- >.,*::=1,i=ilike-•}... Ti'rni..z.:1 AU... r', •,,,1•1:1:, 0 ° .r.1;S:"' .,4:•:144....st,./.. ,Ipti011i\,•• ..:.,,;,,,ii.E4fi ,•...:LT.........:ik,, ,.......,;.,„„,,,,..,,v;;;;;.,,.Z.,i,,,,Il C - 0 . :ClAcir,:;.4.:!"CiAb.:Ztitp.04141.".=,.„..• CZ CD (...) :,•:ZtVit,.:,.,i'•.,L',,II.V=1,42,1,.iltIllig 0- = (.,,, zit 1 litr:.0;;JF,,f•.,..riTtL=411:4„..1,,::-..ii•pli E u_ c ..titi: tite,f,.-_-.....,i;A.i.g.ii.:Liiip,..;,..1,i.ciii.'.1•449,, o x o >c,u , • 3.,........niiutm.;ii C.) L-- ....,,,,,:*-ty,,..4.!...i. ',,,if•,e.:,,,,,it,...itr..!,slit.;',:rOatiy, CTS 4-3 c 0 < -0(n....*%.1fii.,4T:I=I-444,0,-41.14C'Aifig c a. c, 0 _c .•,... ...vv.'.••--i,„=:,.,..,..±:mlitup,14.40t, o - -.,:-.; o_ „., 7,T#1,.-4.:t.'-',*, i", - • 04'''''14,„4-1.,i,..ii4 as 0 a_ ':.t-i,•,,,1-10r__C-4'."-.. ,' .--i ,)1914,4i,,illm-4-2- ,_ r ,.., o . .„,ii:,, -.,. --it,,,, o ,..., v a -15." 4--*-•-,•1' •,,4":434,,Pnirtte - c -63 ,- ,,,ti eN.,,,,itte .,,,tr;44,4i,....9"irt..•TV:',C a o ix,,,.....„4"...74:4,1,,,,v„,,‘• .,r 0.t .„„. .....4.1,,..tror.,,,,b-.. . ,,,,. Hikli•.ki.,....i.1-2.iirm,sit X ° > U 4-3101011.4Z,:',1:6,14,15„--gailypitt:... u_s 17 c = •- o 0 __.(1) 0 ,- x .CL *-±- ct • .6 > ...... ,._ cu E • u o c ,...... o , >- E c c .-.. ._u 0 cm .2 crs 0 ---.. c •,... C) ° • •- a) al cv E L-• co E %-- •... 0 -`- _ ra 8 0 0 0 0 1/4..) - , , CI. U C- - .- L.- 0 2- d L.- L.- a. cU 0 0 c 0 a) a. b.° U 0L) .- ,_ ..) 0 Z U C 0 ‘r, U C U U U = za)", ) = as 0 X t i cu x ce cl) 73 a) c as c 1 o ,- ....... - - Z c ez 0 0 di. _..... C13 (i) •.... 2z C Z .2 z ...... co ..-- - 4_, ....... ..... ..... C at , •_ 0 . ...-:.. u U C C _ --- C c .,.. — ......, ,.... , N vl 0 6 < 73 ,-• - - CO U 4.. '1' .... 0 4:siki''..1.eig#0,1kAti,i4iiib:AVITI,tfif.i144,,,,,ighteifr/26,-.:: rjit riLttil,,,,,, Mz, MOM-....,iigA7",r,in,•411,,,*" ,..tit. .,.1,. ' q.:iiri:St45.4i;,,,,,g•.-;';,':','7,,....itshii:i”,p,!;:iiitr4ftl,,,V 0 .r.i -10 A',•,,,,;11"...=..,,,- 11,-,••:, •'. .i, : 4,04.W.41.v•i•or, :-* 11111 C >.,e ,fr.tirAil, ...I.:firtilk.4,14:4,i:•• • "'*f.rite,,,,,,,,..",.0. . • ear;;....ioqiitteA4Iihil,14.,17:•N:.,:.„,„, •e.1:11**y..2-7-F.z: lia ...... - -..., L.- !f.hrgra70,0114, . ?2.77:_,•..1,tr.a,_. ...-..., ,:::.*,411,:.,.,.;,,,.,.:,,,,,„re,,..,,...,;:.,...r4.0,,, ,:ft.,,,,.,.;,),—,.,,,,......tiGe,f,.,:„.'!%:,03 ,,,,..,,,,t,•7‘,;:ip.„7,15,, (.11. m E . ..-... . u --- ::. ... ....,„,•.,...k.i.,.,,,,,..k.,et;i.1.:1 .,....,„.,,,...,,,.......,:,,,..4,...,,,,tt.2,,,,,,,, ...... u cc c .,,,..,*,.,,,,,ovtrgett,.::.ate....4.• •r,•,...,...,,,,,,,,,k.a,,i. .- ,.. c o ...... 0 1.r,m7.-4,...,... ,,,,,,,,,„,,,,.....,,,,,,,K_,..c.ns,,,,,,,•0.,,,,,,I s CD O2 _ •_ ..-• ._ ..---- - - ,,-:..4,.!eve:,:.".;::'r..iifitilAirwr:--;,h,i aft •::?:',3):..- ;,..',,,,,i,:,!! QVI ...... - as.. cu 0 cu 0 k,VP•u,.0=f;ti-gtm.r7700:1Zit:izitip,-.1,14 , -„z C 6 c L_C- C 0. um 0 .......„ ,_ ,,,,init:0`.1.!.4.1,:c0-Fciggittltjt,erSint0.4:1)C4TIgt ". - O 0 C 0 " 1. 1•4,547:4,-,-,44.;;;L,IfiTigtgliAwatit,P11,4. gir u u ilgrVie: .,..i 0:,:!,....,i!iliV;;;;;;„p!•::......11.,,MIT''.',!ii,i...4i1TV.. [iliggillUiri•rri*f:10,,,a0,,For,iti#= ;147...It-, 44 U W II I= 0 . gn •A % IrSi 2 cu 1.. .... ... a.. in4111 Iall 3 C 0 al 4 ..... Z 0 oa = c O 0 u_ .N .- C < as 0 as --.....- .......0 . i C -0 0 ••••• 4-, < c cz C •... . as 0 ......... --.., ..=:''"Arl.,' .r, ..i:••. ,c,...., 117:.: :::::.i*t in a glin:i twi,cvz IT,41,:177.74,,; :ii tir ,.;,401,g,....- 3, ,iN E ..,pm,,,.. ,77r'•,,,,, .,.. .. ?If 'ilitiVLATPI.,i1, ggrii047:•:4?.'WeztdfSh0117L.V.:,_. a "4,41/4ktfqig.00!=ltItit..itaiNN;6.•;1'.'!"`.1.:Ziiiiard::IVI!'.:,E2: TiFiri,nriftfri'iEU401.44'.:'"il•VIL-...,'-'11C4i3lfW ..P:".74.4i; r..ipm:ii, ... . • --rE.,...i,0:!;M:Irr..,,,,,,,..:,..--,1.1.1.,,, 11,4_112Y.ViDeggliviVignilirao.eirtlogizikei0V,q.' 'imwtior>iiii,,,or-r,,,,irt,,,,,,J,,,aph.,.:,4iL,one,,,i.,,,„:iy, .t.t.,.......,-SL.0,,,,,,l'",it,'',-,iir4r.',M.A.I.41:7!,f,rgti14.701,44 F,Faitrit.ChIrralidgiVe.riatingUtOkf,Mr . j,,tTniltitea,ii,;,fiumilitAECI.4r:',,44::..'ieVrWint3R,...1;r44- • r . GIANT INDUSTRIES,INC. CORPORATE ENTITIES Name: GIANT INDUSTRIES ARIZONA,INC.,an Arizona corporation A Z. L.; 5 P'= Address: 23733 North Scottsdale Road F 2 1 gg Scottsdale,Arizona 85255-3465 (602)585-8888 Date of Incorporation: December 11, 1968(Giant Service Stations,Inc.) Amendment:April 23, 1974(Giant Industries, Inc.) Amendment: October 12, 1989(Giant Industries Arizona,Inc.) Employer ID No.: 86-0218157 Duration: Perpetual Annual Meeting: Second Quarter of Each Fiscal Year(Calendar Year) Authorized Capital: 50 Million Common Shares at$0.01 Par Value Shares Outstanding: 1,000(Giant Industries,Inc.) Foreign Authorization: California(March 4, 1970) New Mexico(February 20, 1974) (d/b/a Arizona Giant Industries,Inc.) Texas(October 4, 1976) Colorado(August 13, 1981) Utah(April 4, 1985) Nevada(February 28, 1985) States the Tax Dept.Reports to for Various Purposes: Sales Tax Returns Filed In: Arizona Louisiana Oklahoma Utah California Nevada Texas Wyoming Colorado New Mexico Excise Fuel Reports: Federal California Nevada Texas Arizona Colorado New Mexico Utah Income/Franchise: Arizona Colorado Texas California New Mexico Utah Agent for Service of Process: CT Corporation System(3225 North Central Avenue,Phoenix,Arizona 85012) Officers and Directors: James E.Acridge Chairman of the Board,President,and CEO Fredric L.Holliger Director,Executive Vice President,and COO Morgan M.Gust Director,Executive Vice President Monte N.Swetnam Executive Vice President Administration and Corporate Affairs Leroy Crow Senior Vice President,Operations Division Philip W.Tomczyk Senior Vice President,Retail Division Guy W.Yates Senior Vice President,Raw Material Supply&Marketing, Planning&Acquisitions Division Greg Heinlein Senior vice President,Risk Management and Trading Michael S.Hardy Vice President Transportation Carl D. Shook Vice President,Engineering&Analysis Luke K. Wethers Vice President,Raw Material Supply Mark B.Cox Vice President,Treasurer,Financial Officer, and Assistant Secretary Gary R.Dalke Vice President,Controller,Accounting Officer,and Assistant Secretary Kim H.Bullerdick Vice President,Legal Department Director,and Secretary January 15, 1999 SECTION 12 Location to Location Transfer: (Bars and Liquor Stores ONLY) APPLICANTS CANNOT OPERATE UNDER A LOCATION TRgINSFER UNTIL IT IS APPROVED BY THE STATE. 4rrent Business Name and Address: (Exactly as it appears on license) 2. New Business Name and Address: (Do not use PO Box Number) 3. License Type: License Number: Last Renewal Date: 4. What date do you plan to move? What date do you plan to open? SECTION 13 Questions for all in-state applicants: 1. Distance to nearest school: ft. Name/Address of school: (regardless of distance) ' 2. Distance to nearest church: ft. Name/Address of church: . (regardless of distance) , \41� n the: 0 LESSEE 0 SUBLESSEE ®OWNER ❑PUR (o 'r=ii ses) 4. If the premises is leased give lessors name and address: Monthly rental lease rate$ 5. What is the total business indebtedness of the applicant for this license/location? $ Does any one creditor represent more than 10%of that sum? 0 YES 0 NO If yes,list below. Total must equal 100%. Last First Mddle %Owed Residence Address City State Tp (ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEET IF NECESSARY) 6. What type of business will this license be used for?(BE SPECIric) Convenience store and Gas Station 7. Has a license,or a transfer license for the premises on this application been denied by the state within the past one(1)year? 0 YES El NO If yes,attach explanation. 3. Does any spirituous liquor manufacturer,wholesaler,or employee,have any interest in your business? DYES ®NO ). Is the premises currently licensed with a liquor license? 0 YES ®NO If yes,give license number and licensee's name: (Exactly as it appears on license) • r SECTION 14 Restaurant, or Hotel-Motel Applicants: 1. Is there a valid restaurant or hotel-motel license at the proposed location? ❑YES ❑NO If yes,give licensee's name: and license#: Last First Middle 2. If the answer to Question 1 is YES,you may qualify for an Interim Permit to operate while your application is pending;consult A.R.S.Section 4-203.01;and complete Section 5 of this application. 3. All restaurant applicants must complete a Restaurant Operation Plan(Form LIC0114)provided by the Department of Liquor. you understand that 40% of your annual gross revenue must be from food sales? 0 YES ❑NO 4. Do SECTION 15 Diagram of Premises: (Blueprints not accepted, diagram must be on this form) 1. Check ALL boxes that apply to your licensed remises: Entrances/Exits Liquor storage areas Drive-in windows Patio enclosures ❑ Service windows 0 Under construction:estimated completion date 2. Restaurants and Hotel/Motel applicants must explicitly depict kitchen equipment and dining facilities. 3. The diagram below is the only area where spirituous liquor is to be sold,served,consumed,dispensed,possessed,or stored. Give the square footage or outside dimensions of the licensed premises. DO NOT INCLUDE PARKING LOTS,LIVING QUARTERS,ETC. 10, YOU MUST NOTIFY THE DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR OF ANY CHANGES OF BOUNDARIE , ITS OR SERVICE WINDOWS MADE AFTER SUBMISSION OF THIS DIAGRAM. ENTRANCES, EX , 6 . LS., ...h..1 ..r..,,........ ,..el... .,..., .. •. . • ...............“.. tEl , . , . I i 1 I . ; • 1. I - I I . i I . • i • I I I I 1 • I 1 I I I i I 1 i ---.....--.................... . .; E.] 0 r..7.1. ......••.......•_•............... . 1-1 !i i • •-.,r•-• ---•,5,-----• er- 0 i/ • I• I ! i 1 A 11 1 i i ! 1 1.%.,j r ,I L.-.-.——-—,..f...., -.:.-_-= \ ----1 • II 4. SZ, i• 11\,\ / 1 (.Z Ci ii 1 • L(0 5 To rci c-1 -, ,1 . . .II r----r---r"-----.-----1-•-• ----7---—T--- ----.—.---t—----1----1!i %\ I :ii ! t i 1 t t t ! !II \t I: it---,-..-...:t..,..:::::::.-3..:.,,.,...••.-..•.,•.,....t.:.-.•:,...gr..:1:•,.....,,,Jr..,..-..,S.L.....,,, .:.:.,,...t.,,..-..,.,..:1:::,.--:.1,14,.11j,7 .i•-••-•••••. • "1 1 ; i 1 ; 1 1 k ( ; R I 1 I i, f'. I'‘. I\ 1%. I\ .1‘. I\ !.' i.‘• I I ‘../‘%\ I ,, . \ • t--", I, '.-i •• \ !• 1\ !‘.. 1• i,,, i.‘ i,. i•.,. I•, I i ,,,, /- `.,,...1 '......j '........j ''-..„1 '......; '....._i '-...! ''....„4.....‘.:-...._..j...,•••••,-.4........',......1...:‘-•--I ,,% . ‘t t .,/' I.,-" 1 ‘1\.,I \\‘ n. / . ....."., / \ 1,...%•,, A • I'', , 4. ... /• i ' - ./ ••,, ‘. : .., \A t / ,• *). ) ...• • > .... ,..• k,%% . .7; / d. `_•1 - .... .,. , „.• ..e < . t\\\ \ •• .1,‘ /* '• ., ." /- • ' ,'% / •.i , t,\\\ ., / .„,• „ / 4". • ./ ,*1 ./ ,. ' 4,.', / .• ,L., > " -,..*k/• /',... ,,'••1,.,„ < ./.'• l')i '-7 ...Ci','' 1 , •1.%1 /. .... /...• ,• , ' .,. •' /. 1.r.4 I.,,% ! e • • „ t',1..*_..... .--• I I s'e. ,' 1. N' ' .'••• .e/ :k,.., .,A, 1 ' \, , \ , /•,. , ) • ). •,;„• .., ./ 'd .; ../ '.. , '1 , /. • , 1 4( I, 't i 1.,t . .- 1-.Z1 • 11 1 • •. /* •. '!" • / ,./ • ‘• i' •• •. , •• i'1 1 It II. •I % ,........-_., I I I 1..) I 4 • t i 1 1 I i .•--•-••••••.., • „L.__t„,,„ ' -......-.I t i i ....4 t 1 r ,......... • . ./1,AV.‹, S• i 9, 11 CJI i // ,•. • • '''' • / .,„ . . • /..."':', .1_ S,• !1 i !.......— 1 • f.=.r.... ..." `.,.., •. •..*1.,,),,e, •) ,,___ L... f! .C.•....,1,,,), ) wr 'ii,... r I, r!r••...•7 I . i , s• ‘• , ,„e .1< .,. .. /i, I ti. ,....=:!.. 1 \ ,e,./.. •\, 1/4. c!' ,'.• r. ... , I I ! . , X. 1 1; f Ill ! 1, •,/,,..e. / )\ v• • ./ ,,, .,„ /• ..,...., ,. a^', .\ ,' Se,ei \(. ' '\ i if I Is 4., , ,.---, ,_• a. i : ,,:••••,.. \'` i• ' •.‘', ,i ,..... /‹ I " I t.... • -,...- •••,..., ''' ( ',?\ ?t 1,,,,l'• ?' i I i i 1 . •\, \ i \ .' , <, > \ ', .:1 1 • 7// 2::S.' 7 .. . .......... ...............".. .. ...Sj..j -"'"7.7'...':'', '1....:_........! ...,..................., ; r. , . , 1 t ....... , I I I .--------.---.-1---1- 1 ......... 4 j ,, • . I— --- i . il•-. ;141, i .,,, ; : .. • • L. -i st.i.....1 1111101rrillill N/ : I ,_ ,........v..-.. . ...!!..„.,,_:.., l_. ; cs. ..... • i -... L. , A4 . • •• g i i . `IFt.: -., NI 1F,..7•...._a.......•• r: 4 , . cs.... , , .... . V MI i....--. .__--—._. .E •_._._.., . .............._.............:_.........._1-E-1---I- ; • • . _. _••A.. .,::::: -;zi mi. A .”........4... . , . ._, , ... . . ... P.•.... 1 i ! 111' IN 1 1 . i() 0 I I 1 • • i . 2 • 1 1 ' 01:::/ El • t . -..--... •.............. 14 t- . • • • • TOTAL P.05 s. ("7, SECTION Location to Location Transfer* Bars ard Liquor Stores ONLY) q APPLICANTS CANNOT OPERATE UNDER A LOCATION TRANSFER UNTIL IT 1$APPROVED PP ROV ED Y THE STATE. _ ,.Tent Business Name and Address: Cly as it app=rs on license) 2. New Business Name and Address: _ not use PO Box Number) 3. License Type: License Nor. __-- Last Renewal Date: 4. What date do you plan to mope? What date do you plan to open? Animmew SECTION 13 Questions for all in-state applicants: 1. Distunce to nearest school: ft Name/Address of school Coronado Elementary School. (regardless of distance) 3401 E. Wilds Rd. , Catalina, AZ 85737 . 2. Distance to nearest church 12,I44,f , Narceimdruss of church: Santa Catalina Catholic Church (regardless of distance) . 4 Q Craoie, C tralina, AZ 857 7 3. the: LP-SSEE Q&MUSS= ®OWNER, • 4. If the premises is leased give lessors name and address: _ - - - --- ---- Monthly rental/lease rate$ 5. What is the total 'ti indebtedness of the applicant for this license/location?.$ 0 _ Does any one motor represent more than 10%of that sum? 0 YES O If yes,list below. Total must Nual 100%. Last sin mimic %Owed Resice Actress Se• e (=AM ADDrONAL SHEET IF NECE.SSARY) .-'�-.T.,► 6. What type of business will this license be used for?(BE SPEcTIO) .. -. -, - 7. Has a license,or a transfer license for the premises on this application been denied by the state within theast one P (1)year? YES El NO If yes,attach explanation. . Does any spirituous liquor manufacturer,wholesaler,or employee,have any interest in your business? DYES Ll NO 9. Is the premises currently licensed with a liquor license? 0 YES El NO If yes,give license number and licensee's name: (Exactly as it appears on license) SECTION 16 Geographical Data: A SAMPLE FOR THIS SECTION IS PROVIDED ON THE BACK OF THIS PAGE. T=�t below the exact names of all churches,schools,and spirituous liquor outlets within a one half mile radius of your proposed location. 1. bcn Foods D s rt Market 2. NT 3. Clio ala. C c-ina Italiana 4. 5. I 6. cn 7. 8 2 0 Rancho Vistoso Blvd. 9. A 10. • 11. • 12. • 13. a) 14. TACH ADDITIONAL STIEEI'IF NECESSARY) A=Your business name and identify cross streets. SECTION 17 Signature Block: • I, CarL s Guerra_ ,declare that 1)I am the APPLICANT(Agent/Club Member/Partner),making this (Pant name of APPLICANT/AGENT listed in Section 4 Question 1) application; 2)I have read the application and the contents and all statements are true,correct and complete;3)that this application is not being made to defraud or injure any creditor,taxing authority,regulatory authority,or transferor,4)that no other person,firm,or corporation,except as indicated, has an interest in the spirituous liquor license for which these statements are made; and 5) that none of the owners, partners, members,officers,directors or stockholders listed have been convicted of a felony in the past five(5)years. QX ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME (Signature) this ," dayof - /r :7! Day of Month Month Year /9 7 , My commission expires on: (Signature of NOT Y PUBLIC) r1DCR1S E.ABBOTT iO3: Notary a J.ublic.stzt3 of Art= MARICGPA CcUN1Y My Comm.Was Aug, e3 SAMPLE GEOGRAPHICAL DATA the mapprovided below indicates your proposed location In the area adjacent to and the exact names of all churches, schools , and alcoholic beverage outlets within a 1/2 mile radius of your proposed location. (See example below) A ! Applicant Series 12 01 Pink Elephants Series 06 02 Mama ' s Rest . Series 12 03 Corner Liquors Series 09 04 Joe' s Groceries Series 10 05 Lions Club Series 14 06 Burgers R Us Series 07 N 07 Pizza Perfect Series 07 08 Bill • y Bobs Bar Series 06 MMi . 09 St . Anthonys Church 3 Latrobe 10 St. Anthonys School 1 C 11 Burbank Middle School N 11 1mi . Lockwood T 4 2 7 1/ mi. 12 First United Baptist Church 12 ©r . A 13 T.nrP1 6 L 8 14 9 10 15 A.R.S. Section 4-207 .A reads as follows : 4 Mi. • issued for anypremises which are. at the time A. No retailers license shall be 300 • received bythe Director, within three hundred(300) the license application is horizontal feet of a church, within three hundred(300) horizontal feet of a public or private school building with kindergarten programs or any of or within three hundred (300 ) horizontal grades one (1) through twelve (12 } feet of a fenced recreational area adjacent to such school building . GIANT INDUSTRIES ARIZONA, INC. (THE "COMPANY") AND ITS WHOLLY-OWNED SUBSIDIARIES Except for the liquor licenses listed below which are owned or leased by thCCompany and/or its affiliates as of February 19, 1999, I do not presently hold, as an individual and in personal capacity, any interest in a liquor license in this or any other state. Since its incorporation in 196 rtheJ Company:=hias1old various liquor licenses which were associated with assets or businesses that have been sold to third parties; such liquor lic:n.es are not ' ted ht4-'n. P By: / ' ..a . !A.._- Date: O3-. O9- 99 ARIZONA LIQUOR LICENSES Store# State Liq Lic Location City ST Zip 1 AZ 10071126 7035 N. 35th Ave. Phoenix AZ 85051 3 AZ 10033014 2960 W. Hwy 89A Sedona AZ 86336 6 AZ 10030049 1205 S. Milton Flagstaff AZ 86001 16 AZ 10131011 999 South Main Cottonwood AZ 86326 17 AZ 9070522 17027 Cave Creek Phoenix AZ 85032 28 AZ 10073027 704 E. Greenway Pkwy. Phoenix AZ 85022 30 AZ 10073026 8646 E. FLW Pkwy. Scottsdale AZ 85260 32 AZ 10071359 23609 N. Scottsdale Rd. Scottsdale AZ 85255 42 AZ 10043010 701 E. Hwy 260 Payson AZ 85541 45 AZ 10033004 2300 E. Butler Flagstaff AZ 86004 193 AZ 09090009 410 Hopi Dr. Holbrook AZ 86024 194 AZ 10033034 11985 Hwy. 89 Flagstaff AZ 86004 219 AZ 10010008 PO Box 218 Springerville AZ 85938 222 AZ 10093016 PO Box 661 Lakeside AZ 85929 223 AZ 10093013 1981E Deuce of Clubs Show Low AZ 85901 224 AZ 10093014 PO Box 368 Taylor AZ 85939 900 AZ 10020048 201 N. Haskell Willcox AZ 86444 905 AZ 10030008 Mormon Lake Rd & I-17 Munds Park AZ 86017 908 AZ 10050008 300 Hwy. 70 Safford AZ 85546 911 AZ 10020047 1807 10th Street Douglas AZ 85607 913 AZ 10070668 5049 W. Buckeye Phoenix AZ 85043 914 AZ 10073035 7550 S. Rural Road Tempe AZ 85283 915 AZ 10070669 6807 E. Baseline Rd. Mesa AZ 85208 918 AZ 10070671 2743 S. Alma School Rd. Mesa AZ 85210 919 AZ 10100262 4180 W. Ina Rd. Tucson AZ 85741 920 AZ 10040022 804 S. Beeline Hwy. Payson AZ 85541 922 AZ 10100264 2100 W. Ruthrauff Rd. Tucson AZ 85705 924 AZ 10101098 761 W. Ajo Tucson AZ 85713 927 AZ 10101097 4479 W. Ina Rd. Tucson AZ 85741 929 AZ 10101096 9491 E. 22nd St. Tucson AZ 85710 930 AZ 10101099 2750 S. Kolb Rd. Tucson AZ 85730 931 AZ 10101100 3780 W. Magee Rd. Tucson AZ 85741 932 AZ 10071497 4305 E. Ray Rd. Phoenix AZ 85044 COLORADO LIQUOR LICENSES 59 CO 13-12452-0001 26223 U.S. Highway 160 Durango CO 81301 229 CO 11-65395-0023 PO Box 329 Dolores CO 81323 260 CO 11-65395-0028 921 E.Main Cortez CO 81321 405 CO 09-70268-0000 2201 Main St. Alamosa CO 81101 675 CO 23-40235-0001 PO Box 487 South Fork CO 81154 676 CO 23-40235-0003 805 Grand Del Norte CO 81132 r NEW MEXICO LIQUOR LICENSES 2 NM 393 2654 E. Hwy 66 Ave. Gallup NM 87301 4 NM 4025 531 E. Broadway Farmington NM 87401 5 NM 624 6100 San Mateo NE4.buquerque NM 87109 M 9 NM585 1730 S. 2nd St. lGallup -.- NM 87301 10 NM 1323 5200 Menaul Blvd. N� Albuq,zer ugv NM 87110 11 NM 1038 201 Rio Bravo SW L L¢ - Albu jt e�r ue' NM 87105 12 NM 584 701 N. Hwy 666 Gallup NM 87301 14 NM 4033 3341 E. Main St. Farmington NM 87401 15 NM 200 3603 Hwy 528 Albuquerque NM 87114 20 NM 755 201 Coors Rd. NW Albuquerque NM 87105 24 NM 632 4720 Tramway NE Albuquerque NM 87111 25 NM 339 2930 Coors Rd. NW Albuquerque NM 87120 26 NM 1029 1897 Coors Rd. SW Albuquerque NM 87105 27 NM 932 6104 Academy NE Albuquerque NM 87109 31 NM 4007 2101 Southern Blvd. Rio Rancho NM 87124 33 NM 711 3524 Hwy 47 Los Lunas NM 87031 34 NM 621 135 Candelaria Rd. NW Albuquerque NM 87107 35 NM 619 10400 Central SE Albuquerque NM 87123 36 NM 586 224 Hwy 44 Bernalillo NM 87004 37 NM 4014 1050 Hwy 528 Rio Rancho NM 87124 38 NM 593 6242 4th St. NW Albuquerque NM 87107 39 NM 142 19384 Hwy 85 Belen NM 87002 41 NM 031 9690 Golf Course Rd. NW Albuquerque NM 87114 43 NM 851 233 Main St. SE Los Lunas NM 87031 46 NM 900 2691 Sawmill Rd. Santa Fe NM 87505 55 NM 895 1009 St. Francis Dr. Santa Fe NM 87501 56 NM 3 1698 St. Michaels Dr. Santa Fe NM 87505 118 NM 5521 2790 US Hwy. 550 Aztec NM 87410 127 , NM 4058 2603 E. 20th St. Farmington NM 87401 159 NM 1366 507 E. Broadway Farmington NM 87401 168 NM 0934 PO Box 8002 Bernalillo NM 87004 183 NM 0935 902 N. Riverside Dr. Espanola NM 87532 185 NM 0964 510 N. 666 Gallup NM 87301 196 NM 1048 PO Box 118 Vanderwagen NM 87326 200 NM 0773 6475 Main Cuba NM 87013 207 NM 1046 PO Box 70 Church Rock NM 87311 208 NM 0359 1223 E. 66th Gallup NM 87301 210 NM 0886 204 S. Bloomfield Blvd. Bloomfield NM 87413 211 NM 4043 2700 W. Main Farmington NM 87401 214 NM 4070 602 W. Broadway Bloomfield NM 87413 217 NM 4034 8180 E. Main Farmington NM 87401 218 NM 2018 5702 Hwy. 64 Farmington NM 87401 220 NM 4071 609 E. 20th St. Farmington NM 87401 227 NM 0587 416 N. Main Aztec NM 87410 232 NM 0376 PO Box 217 San Ysidro NM 87053 239 NM 5507 Star Rte 4, Box 3000 Bloomfield NM 87413 240 NM 2022 3001 Bloomfield Hwy. Farmington NM 87401 278 NM 0105 Box 28 Estancia NM 87016 310 NM 1044 PO Box 1443 Waterflow NM 87421 408 NM 0822 3340 E. Hwy. 66 Gallup NM 87301 409 NM 0341 3302 W. Hwy. 66 Gallup NM 87301 549 NM 508 650 Bosque Farms Blvd. Bosque Farms NM 87068 555 NM 0950 286 S. Riverside Espanola NM 87532 557 NM 0132 800 E. Coal Gallup NM 87301 265/270 NM 0595 3215 Hwy. 64 (Hogback) Waterflow NM 87421 VOLUNTARY TEMPORARY SUSPENSION LIQUOR LICENSES: NM740 and NM 356 GIANT INDUSTRIES ARIZONA, INC.,(THE "COMPANY") AND ITS WHOLLY-OWNED SUBSIDIARIES Except for the liquor licenses listed below which are owned ,lase4My•;the.Company and/or its affiliates as of February 19, 1999, I do not presently hold, as an individual and in personal capacity, any interest in a liquor license in this or any other state. Since its incorpo ation jib')1:9.69;=-th ;Company has held various liquor licenses which were associated with assets or businesses that have '}ee sold to third parties; such liquor licenses are not listed herein. By: ae-)\-1---d-d" Date: --7- 9- 71/9 ARIZONA LIQUOR LICENSES Store# State Liq Lic Location City ST Zip 1 AZ 10071126 7035 N. 35th Ave. Phoenix AZ 85051 3 AZ 10033014 2960 W. Hwy 89A Sedona AZ 86336 6 AZ 10030049 1205 S. Milton Flagstaff AZ 86001 16 AZ 10131011 999 South Main Cottonwood AZ 86326 17 AZ 9070522 17027 Cave Creek Phoenix AZ 85032 28 AZ 10073027 704 E. Greenway Pkwy. Phoenix AZ 85022 30 AZ 10073026 8646 E. FLW Pkwy. Scottsdale AZ 85260 32 AZ 10071359 23609 N. Scottsdale Rd. Scottsdale AZ 85255 42 AZ 10043010 701 E. Hwy 260 Payson AZ 85541 45 AZ 10033004 2300 E. Butler Flagstaff AZ 86004 193 AZ 09090009 410 Hopi Dr. Holbrook AZ 86024 194 AZ 10033034 11985 Hwy. 89 Flagstaff AZ 86004 219 AZ 10010008 PO Box 218 Springerville AZ 85938 222 AZ 10093016 PO Box 661 Lakeside AZ 85929 223 AZ 10093013 1981E Deuce of Clubs Show Low AZ 85901 224 AZ 10093014 PO Box 368 Taylor AZ 859.39 900 AZ 10020048 201 N. Haskell Willcox AZ 86444 905 AZ 10030008 Mormon Lake Rd & I-17 Munds Park AZ 86017 908 AZ 10050008 300 Hwy. 70 Safford AZ 85546 911 AZ 10020047 1807 10th Street Douglas AZ 85607 913 AZ 10070668 5049 W. Buckeye Phoenix AZ 85043 914 AZ 10073035 7550 S. Rural Road Tempe AZ 85283 915 AZ 10070669 6807 E. Baseline Rd. Mesa AZ 85208 918 AZ 10070671 2743 S.Alma School Rd. Mesa AZ 85210 919 AZ 10100262 4180 W. Ina Rd. Tucson AZ 85741 920 AZ 10040022 804 S. Beeline Hwy. Payson AZ 85541 922 AZ 10100264 2100 W. Ruthrauff Rd. Tucson AZ 85705 924 AZ 10101098 761 W.Ajo Tucson AZ 85713 927 AZ 10101097 4479 W. Ina Rd. Tucson AZ 85741 929 AZ 10101096 9491 E. 22nd St. Tucson AZ 85710 930 AZ 10101099 2750 S. Kolb Rd. Tucson AZ 85730 931 AZ 10101100 3780 W. Magee Rd. Tucson AZ 85741 932 AZ 10071497 4305 E. Ray Rd. Phoenix AZ 85044 COLORADO LIQUOR LICENSES 59 CO 13-12452-0001 26223 U.S. Highway 160 Durango CO 81301 229 CO 11-65395-0023 PO Box 329 Dolores CO 81323 260 CO 11-65395-0028 921 E. Main Cortez CO 81321 405 CO 09-70268-0000 2201 Main St. Alamosa CO 81101 675 CO 23-40235-0001 PO Box 487 South Fork CO 81154 676 CO 23-40235-0003 805 Grand Del Norte CO 81132 NEW MEXICO LIQUOR LICENSES 2 NM 393 2654 E. Hwy 66 Ave. Gallup NM 87301 4 NM 4025 531 E. Broadway Farmington NM 87401 5 NM 624 6100 San Mateo NE Albuquerque NM 87109 9 NM 585 1730 S. 2nd St. A 7. . s Gallup NM 87301 10 NM 1323 5200 Menaul Blvd. NE Albuqu-ordue NM 87110 11 NM 1038 201 Rio Bravo SW •frp 1 2 411b,pq-u..p,Tve NM 87105 12 NM 584 701 N. Hwy 666 ' & I.iip:'i "I ' NM 87301 14 NM 4033 3341 E. Main St. Farmington NM 87401 15 NM 200 3603 Hwy 528 Albuquerque NM 87114 20 NM 755 201 Coors Rd. NW Albuquerque NM 87105 24 NM 632 4720 Tramway NE Albuquerque NM 87111 25 NM 339 2930 Coors Rd. NW Albuquerque NM 87120 26 NM 1029 1897 Coors Rd. SW Albuquerque NM 87105 27 NM 932 6104 Academy NE Albuquerque NM 87109 31 NM 4007 2101 Southern Blvd. Rio Rancho NM 87124 33 NM 711 3524 Hwy 47 Los Lunas NM 87031 34 NM 621 135 Candelaria Rd. NW Albuquerque NM 87107 35 NM 619 10400 Central SE Albuquerque NM 87123 36 NM 586 224 Hwy 44 Bernalillo NM 87004 37 NM 4014 1050 Hwy 528 Rio Rancho NM 87124 38 NM 593 6242 4th St. NW Albuquerque NM 87107 39 NM 142 19384 Hwy 85 Belen NM 87002 41 NM 031 9690 Golf Course Rd. NW Albuquerque NM 87114 43 NM 851 233 Main St. SE Los Lunas NM 87031 46 NM 900 2691 Sawmill Rd. Santa Fe NM 87505 55 NM 895 1009 St. Francis Dr. Santa Fe NM 87501 56 NM 3 1698 St. Michaels Dr. Santa Fe NM 87505 118 NM 5521 2790 US Hwy. 550 Aztec NM 87410 127 NM 4058 2603 E. 20th St. Farmington NM 87401 159 NM 1366 507 E. Broadway Farmington NM 87401 168 NM 0934 PO Box 8002 Bernalillo NM 87004 183 NM 0935 902 N. Riverside Dr. Espanola NM 87532 185 NM 0964 510 N. 666 Gallup NM 87301 196 NM 1048 PO Box 118 Vanderwagen NM 87326 200 NM 0773 6475 Main Cuba NM 87013 207 NM 1046 PO Box 70 Church Rock NM 87311 208 NM 0359 1223 E. 66th Gallup NM 87301 210 NM 0886 204 S. Bloomfield Blvd. Bloomfield NM 87413 211 NM 4043 2700 W. Main Farmington NM 87401 214 NM 4070 602 W. Broadway Bloomfield NM 87413 217 NM 4034 8180 E. Main Farmington NM 87401 218 NM 2018 5702 Hwy. 64 Farmington NM 87401 220 NM 4071 609 E. 20th St. Farmington NM 87401 227 NM 0587 416 N. Main Aztec NM 87410 232 NM 0376 PO Box 217 San Ysidro NM 87053 239 NM 5507 Star Rte 4, Box 3000 Bloomfield NM 87413 240 NM 2022 3001 Bloomfield Hwy. Farmington NM 87401 278 NM 0105 Box 28 Estancia NM 87016 310 NM 1044 PO Box 1443 Waterflow NM 87421 ' 408 NM 0822 3340 E. Hwy. 66 Gallup NM 87301 409 NM 0341 3302 W. Hwy. 66 Gallup NM 87301 549 NM 508 650 Bosque Farms Blvd. Bosque Farms NM 87068 555 NM 0950 286 S. Riverside Espanola NM 87532 557 NM 0132 800 E. Coal Gallup NM 87301 265/270 NM 0595 3215 Hwy. 64 (Hogback) Waterflow NM 87421 VOLUNTARY TEMPORARY SUSPENSION LIQUOR LICENSES: NM740 and NM 356 4 GIANT INDUSTRIES ARIZONA, INC. (THE "COMPANY") AND ITS WHOLLY-OWNED SUBSIDIARIES Except for the liquor licenses listed below which are owned or leased byl the t o ij afiy and/or its affiliates as of February 19, 1999, I do not presently hold, as an individual..jnd lip. personal,c .p^acity, any interest in a liquor license in this or any other state. Since its incorporation fn 1969, they.Coip:may has held various liquor licenses which were associated with assets or businesses that have been sold to third parties; such liquor license are not liste herein./ By: ✓ 9/Q � Date: 2 d ARIZONA LIQUOR LICENSES Store# State Liq Lie Location City ST Zip 1 AZ 10071126 7035 N. 35th Ave. Phoenix AZ 85051 3 AZ 10033014 2960 W. Hwy 89A Sedona AZ 86336 6 AZ 10030049 1205 S. Milton Flagstaff AZ 86001 16 AZ 10131011 999 South Main Cottonwood AZ 86326 17 AZ 9070522 17027 Cave Creek Phoenix AZ 85032 28 AZ 10073027 704 E. Greenway Pkwy. Phoenix AZ 85022 30 AZ 10073026 8646 E. FLW Pkwy. Scottsdale AZ 85260 32 AZ 10071359 23609 N. Scottsdale Rd. Scottsdale AZ 85255 42 AZ 10043010 701 E. Hwy 260 Payson AZ 85541 45 AZ 10033004 2300 E. Butler Flagstaff AZ 86004 193 AZ 09090009 410 Hopi Dr. Holbrook AZ 86024 194 AZ 10033034 11985 Hwy. 89 Flagstaff AZ 86004 219 AZ 10010008 PO Box 218 Springerville AZ 85938 222 AZ 10093016 PO Box 661 Lakeside AZ 85929 223 AZ 10093013 1981E Deuce of Clubs Show Low AZ 85901 224 AZ 10093014 PO Box 368 Taylor AZ 85939 900 AZ 10020048 201 N. Haskell Wilcox AZ 86444 905 AZ 10030008 Mormon Lake Rd & I-17 Munds Park AZ 86017 908 AZ 10050008 300 Hwy. 70 Safford AZ 85546 911 AZ 10020047 1807 10th Street Douglas AZ 85607 913 AZ 10070668 5049 W. Buckeye Phoenix AZ 85043 914 AZ 10073035 7550 S. Rural Road Tempe AZ 85283 915 AZ 10070669 6807 E. Baseline Rd. Mesa AZ 85208 918 AZ 10070671 2743 S.Alma School Rd. Mesa AZ 85210 919 AZ 10100262 4180 W. Ina Rd. Tucson AZ 85741 920 AZ 10040022 804 S. Beeline Hwy. Payson AZ 85541 922 AZ 10100264 2100 W. Ruthrauff Rd. Tucson AZ 85705 924 AZ 10101098 761 W.Ajo Tucson AZ 85713 927 AZ 10101097 4479 W. Ina Rd. Tucson AZ 85741 929 AZ 10101096 9491 E. 22nd St. Tucson AZ 85710 930 AZ 10101099 2750 S. Kolb Rd. Tucson AZ 85730 931 AZ 10101100 3780 W. Magee Rd. Tucson AZ 85741 932 AZ 10071497 4305 E. Ray Rd. Phoenix AZ 85044 COLORADO LIQUOR LICENSES 59 CO 13-12452-0001 26223 U.S. Highway 160 Durango CO 81301 229 CO 11-65395-0023 PO Box 329 Dolores CO 81323 260 CO 11-65395-0028 921 E.Main Cortez CO 81321 405 CO 09-70268-0000 2201 Main St. Alamosa CO 81101 675 CO 23-40235-0001 PO Box 487 South Fork CO 81154 676 CO 23-40235-0003 805 Grand Del Norte CO 81132 NEW MEXICO LIQUOR LICENSES 2 NM 393 2654 E. Hwy 66 Ave. Gallup NM 87301 4 NM 4025 531 E. Broadway Farmington NM 87401 5 NM 624 6100 San Mateo NE.A Z. L':!Ufik14iiitiuerque NM 87109 9 NM 585 1730 S. 2nd St. Gallup NM 87301 10 NM 1323 5200 Menaul Blvd l? � J&Ibuqe1e NM 87110 11 NM 1038 201 Rio Bravo SW Albuquerque NM 87105 12 NM 584 701 N. Hwy 666 Gallup NM 87301 14 NM 4033 3341 E. Main St. Farmington NM 87401 15 NM 200 3603 Hwy 528 Albuquerque NM 87114 20 NM 755 201 Coors Rd. NW Albuquerque NM 87105 24 NM 632 4720 Tramway NE Albuquerque NM 87111 25 NM 339 2930 Coors Rd. NW Albuquerque NM 87120 26 NM 1029 1897 Coors Rd. SW Albuquerque NM 87105 27 NM 932 6104 Academy NE Albuquerque NM 87109 31 NM 4007 2101 Southern Blvd. Rio Rancho NM 87124 33 NM 711 3524 Hwy 47 Los Lunas NM 87031 34 NM 621 135 Candelaria Rd. NW Albuquerque NM 87107 35 NM 619 10400 Central SE Albuquerque NM 87123 36 NM 586 224 Hwy 44 Bernalillo NM 87004 37 NM 4014 1050 Hwy 528 Rio Rancho NM 87124 38 NM 593 6242 4th St. NW Albuquerque NM 87107 39 NM 142 19384 Hwy 85 Belen NM 87002 41 NM 031 9690 Golf Course Rd. NW Albuquerque NM 87114 43 NM 851 233 Main St. SE Los Lunas NM 87031 46 NM 900 2691 Sawmill Rd. Santa Fe NM 87505 55 NM 895 1009 St. Francis Dr. Santa Fe NM 87501 56 NM 3 1698 St. Michaels Dr. Santa Fe NM 87505 118 NM 5521 2790 US Hwy. 550 Aztec NM 87410 127 NM 4058 2603 E. 20th St. Farmington NM 87401 159 NM 1366 507 E. Broadway Farmington NM 87401 168 NM 0934 PO Box 8002 Bernalillo NM 87004 183 NM 0935 902 N. Riverside Dr. Espanola NM 87532 185 NM 0964 510 N. 666 Gallup NM 87301 196 NM 1048 PO Box 118 Vanderwagen NM 87326 200 NM 0773 6475 Main Cuba NM 87013 207 NM 1046 PO Box 70 Church Rock NM 87311 208 NM 0359 1223 E. 66th Gallup NM 87301 210 NM 0886 204 S. Bloomfield Blvd. Bloomfield NM 87413 211 NM 4043 2700 W. Main Farmington NM 87401 214 NM 4070 602 W. Broadway Bloomfield NM 87413 217 NM 4034 8180 E. Main Farmington NM 87401 218 NM 2018 5702 Hwy. 64 Farmington NM 87401 220 NM 4071 609 E. 20th St. Farmington NM 87401 227 NM 0587 416 N.Main Aztec NM 87410 232 NM 0376 PO Box 217 San Ysidro NM 87053 239 NM 5507 Star Rte 4, Box 3000 Bloomfield NM 87413 240 NM 2022 3001 Bloomfield Hwy. Farmington NM 87401 278 NM 0105 Box 28 Estancia NM 87016 310 NM 1044 PO Box 1443 Waterflow NM 87421 408 NM 0822 3340 E. Hwy. 66 Gallup NM 87301 409 NM 0341 3302 W. Hwy. 66 Gallup NM 87301 549 NM 508 650 Bosque Farms Blvd. Bosque Farms NM 87068 555 NM 0950 286 S. Riverside Espanola NM 87532 557 NM 0132 800 E. Coal Gallup NM 87301 265/270 NM 0595 3215 Hwy. 64 (Hogback) Waterflow NM 87421 VOLUNTARY TEMPORARY SUSPENSION LIQUOR LICENSES: NM740 and NM 356 5 GIANT INDUSTRIES ARIZONA, INC. (THE"COMPANY") AND ITS WHOLLY-OWNED SUBSIDIARIES Except for the liquor licenses listed below which are s&.d;d± leased by the Company and/or its affiliates as of February 19, 1999, I do not presently hold, as an individual and iApersonal capacity, any interest in a liquor license in this or any other state. Since itsilifccii:porticiii.7240.96g, the Company has held various liquor licenses which w re ass• iated with assets or businesses that have been sold to third parties; such liquor licenses are not ',39d rein. By: 44# Date: 3-g" 99 ARIZONA LIQUOR LICE SES Store# State Liq Lie Location City ST Zip 1 AZ 10071126 7035 N. 35th Ave. Phoenix AZ 85051 3 AZ 10033014 2960 W. Hwy 89A Sedona AZ 86336 6 AZ 10030049 1205 S. Milton Flagstaff AZ 86001 16 AZ 10131011 999 South Main Cottonwood AZ 86326 17 AZ 9070522 17027 Cave Creek Phoenix AZ 85032 28 AZ 10073027 704 E. Greenway Pkwy. Phoenix AZ 85022 30 AZ 10073026 8646 E. FLW Pkwy. Scottsdale AZ 85260 32 AZ 10071359 23609 N. Scottsdale Rd. Scottsdale AZ 85255 42 AZ 10043010 701 E. Hwy 260 Payson AZ 85541 45 AZ 10033004 2300 E. Butler Flagstaff AZ 86004 193 AZ 09090009 410 Hopi Dr. Holbrook AZ 86024 194 AZ 10033034 11985 Hwy. 89 Flagstaff AZ 86004 219 , AZ 10010008 PO Box 218 Springerville AZ 85938 222 AZ 10093016 PO Box 661 Lakeside AZ 85929 223 AZ 10093013 1981E Deuce of Clubs Show Low AZ 85901 224 AZ 10093014 PO Box 368 Taylor AZ 85939 900 AZ 10020048 201 N. Haskell Willcox AZ 86444 905 AZ 10030008 Mormon Lake Rd & I-17 Munds Park AZ 86017 908 AZ 10050008 300 Hwy. 70 Safford AZ 85546 911 AZ 10020047 1807 10th Street Douglas AZ 85607 913 AZ 10070668 5049 W. Buckeye Phoenix AZ 85043 914 AZ 10073035 7550 S. Rural Road Tempe AZ 85283 915 AZ 10070669 6807 E. Baseline Rd. Mesa AZ 85208 918 AZ 10070671 2743 S.Alma School Rd. Mesa AZ 85210 919 AZ 10100262 4180 W. Ina Rd. Tucson AZ 85741 920 AZ 10040022 804 S. Beeline Hwy. Payson AZ 85541 922 AZ 10100264 2100 W. Ruthrauff Rd. Tucson AZ 85705 924 AZ 10101098 761 W.Ajo Tucson AZ 85713 927 AZ 10101097 4479 W. Ina Rd. Tucson AZ 85741 929 AZ 10101096 9491 E. 22nd St. Tucson AZ 85710 930 AZ 10101099 2750 S. Kolb Rd. Tucson AZ 85730 931 AZ 10101100 3780 W. Magee Rd. Tucson AZ 85741 932 AZ 10071497 4305 E. Ray Rd. Phoenix AZ 85044 COLORADO LIQUOR LICENSES 59 CO 13-12452-0001 26223 U.S. Highway 160 Durango CO 81301 229 CO 11-65395-0023 PO Box 329 Dolores CO 81323 260 CO 11-65395-0028 921 E.Main Cortez CO 81321 405 CO 09-70268-0000 2201 Main St. Alamosa CO 81101 675 CO 23-40235-0001 PO Box 487 South Fork CO 81154 676 CO 23-40235-0003 805 Grand Del Norte CO 81132 NEW MEXICO LIQUOR LICENSES 2 NM 393 2654 E. Hwy 66 Ave. Gallup NM 87301 4 NM 4025 531 E. Broadway Farmington NM 87401 5 NM 624 6100 San Mateo NE Albuquerque NM 87109 9 NM 585 1730 S. 2nd Si• LI --11-1 ''': L' .Gallup NM 87301 10 NM 1323 5200 Men ul Blvd. NE . ;:kiAlttruerque NM 87110 11 NM 1038 201 Rio Brk o §W i ---) .4" Albuquerque NM 87105 12 NM 584 701 N. Hwy 666 Gallup NM 87301 14 NM 4033 3341 E. Main St. Farmington NM 87401 15 NM 200 3603 Hwy 528 Albuquerque NM 87114 20 NM 755 201 Coors Rd. NW Albuquerque NM 87105 24 NM 632 4720 Tramway NE Albuquerque NM 87111 25 NM 339 2930 Coors Rd. NW Albuquerque NM 87120 26 NM 1029 1897 Coors Rd. SW Albuquerque NM 87105 27 NM 932 6104 Academy NE Albuquerque NM 87109 31 NM 4007 2101 Southern Blvd. Rio Rancho NM 87124 33 NM 711 3524 Hwy 47 Los Lunas NM 87031 34 NM 621 135 Candelaria Rd. NW Albuquerque NM 87107 35 NM 619 10400 Central SE Albuquerque NM 87123 36 NM 586 224 Hwy 44 Bernalillo NM 87004 37 NM 4014 1050 Hwy 528 Rio Rancho NM 87124 38 NM 593 6242 4th St. NW Albuquerque NM 87107 39 NM 142 19384 Hwy 85 Belen NM 87002 41 NM 031 9690 Golf Course Rd. NW Albuquerque NM 87114 43 NM 851 233 Main St. SE Los Lunas NM 87031 46 NM 900 2691 Sawmill Rd. Santa Fe NM 87505 55 NM 895 1009 St. Francis Dr. Santa Fe NM 87501 56 NM 3 1698 St. Michaels Dr. Santa Fe NM 87505 118 NM 5521 2790 US Hwy. 550 Aztec NM 87410 127 NM 4058 2603 E. 20th St. Farmington NM 87401 159 NM 1366 507 E. Broadway Farmington NM 87401 168 NM 0934 PO Box 8002 Bernalillo NM 87004 183 NM 0935 902 N. Riverside Dr. Espanola NM 87532 185 NM 0964 510 N. 666 Gallup NM 87301 196 NM 1048 PO Box 118 Vanderwagen NM 87326 200 NM 0773 6475 Main Cuba NM 87013 207 NM 1046 PO Box 70 Church Rock NM 87311 208 NM 0359 1223 E. 66th Gallup NM 87301 210 NM 0886 204 S. Bloomfield Blvd. Bloomfield NM 87413 211 NM 4043 2700 W. Main Farmington NM 87401 214 NM 4070 602 W. Broadway Bloomfield NM 87413 217 NM 4034 8180 E. Main Farmington NM 87401 218 NM 2018 5702 Hwy. 64 Farmington NM 87401 220 NM 4071 609 E. 20th St. Farmington NM 87401 227 NM 0587 416 N. Main Aztec NM 87410 232 NM 0376 PO Box 217 San Ysidro NM 87053 239 NM 5507 Star Rte 4, Box 3000 Bloomfield NM 87413 240 NM 2022 3001 Bloomfield Hwy. Farmington NM 87401 278 NM 0105 Box 28 Estancia NM 87016 310 NM 1044 PO Box 1443 Waterflow NM 87421 408 NM 0822 3340 E. Hwy. 66 Gallup NM 87301 409 NM 0341 3302 W. Hwy. 66 Gallup NM 87301 549 NM 508 650 Bosque Farms Blvd. Bosque Farms NM 87068 555 NM 0950 286 S. Riverside Espanola NM 87532 557 NM 0132 800 E. Coal Gallup NM 87301 265/270 NM 0595 3215 Hwy. 64 (Hogback) Waterflow NM 87421 VOLUNTARY TEMPORARY SUSPENSION LIQUOR LICENSES: NM740 and NM 356 I la (ZP: N7,01, 11000 N. La Canada Dr. 10. Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 WERNER S.WOLFF,Chief of Police t k Phone (520) 742-5474 FAX (520) 797-2616 A, "A A. � A A . ?`A � � .7`/ 0� I/NDEO- ORO VALLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT "INTEGRITY, PRIDE, EXCELLENCE" TO: WERNER WOLFF, CHIEF OF POLICE KATHRYN CUVELIER, TOWN CLERK FROM: SGT. CORONA a ,e-Ysv;,) RE: BACKGROUND CHECK FOR LIQUOR LICENSE GIANT #6813 12885 N. ORACLE ROAD DATE: April 20, 1999 ON 04/20/99 I COMPLETED THE STANDARD BACKGROUND CHECK FOR GIANT INDUSTRIES ARIZONA, INC.,AND PRINCIPALS, JAMES E. ACRIDGE, FREDERIC L. HOLLIGER, MARK BAKER COX,AND CARLOS ANTONIO GUERRA. BACKGROUND CHECKS WERE QUERIED THROUGH PIMA COUNTY, STATE OF ARIONA, AND THE NATIONAL CRIME INFORMATION CENTER. MR. ACRIDGE, MR. HOLLIGER, MR. COX, AND MR. GUERRA, HAVE NO CRIMINAL RECORD ON FILE WITH ANY OF THE LISTED CRIMINAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS. ON 04/21/99 I MET WITH JOHN SANDERS, SPECIAL INVESTIGATOR WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR LICENSES AND CONTROL. MR. SANDERS INDICATED HIS RECORDS SHOWED NO INFRACTIONS RECORDED UNDER GIANT INDUSTRIES. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 8 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: May 5, 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & TOWN COUNCIL FROM: Chuck Sweet, Town Manager SU BJ: Proposal for Town Hall Art by Matthew Moutafis SUMMARY: Matthew Moutafis has submitted an unsolicited proposal for you to consider this evening to construct a piece of art at the entrance to the Town Hall Administration Building. Mr. Moutafis' proposal is requesting $15,000 from the Town with the balance of the funds being secured through private donations. If the Town Council decides to approve this proposal, there is currently money budgeted in the Parks and Recreation Division for the fiscal year 1998/99 to accommodate the initial $5,000 in seed money. The balance of the town's commitment ($10,000) would need to be budgeted in the upcoming 1999/2000 fiscal year budget. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Matthew Moutafis Proposal - "Pusch Ridge Majesty" 2. Parks and Recreation Division Operating & Maintenance Budget for Art Projects FISCAL IMPACT: $15,000 SUGGESTED MOTION: I make a motion to approve the proposal submitted by Matthew Moutafis to establish an art sculpture at the entrance to the Oro Valley Town Hall Administration Building in an amount not to exceed $15,000 of town funds. or I make a motion to solicit proposals from other artists regarding concepts and the selection be administered by the Public Art Review Committee. or I make a motion to deny the proposal submitted by Matthew Moutafis to establish an art object at the entrance to the Oro Valley Town Hall Administration : ilding. / Aid If/A Al Town Mana• "Pusch Ridge Majesty" By Matthew Moutafis Sculptor SAGEBRUSH DESIGN 10707 N. POMEGRANATE DRIVE ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA 85737 520-742-4307 Pusch Ridge No landmark in Southern Arizona's Oro Valley communicates the power and majesty of our natural environment than this magnificent setting. It's an integral part of the Towns' logo that I designed over 10 years ago. Pusch Ridge Majesty For thousands of years, the big horn sheep have called this place home. Now we also can claim this land for its beauty and spirit. Although few big horn sheep remain, they as we are tied to this place forever. Matthew Moutafis These two paragraphs are significant statements that reinforce our General Plan philosophy and vision. Through the General Plan, our citizens, have expressed their love and passion for the Oro Valley: what was, what is, and a vision of what the future can be. This proposed project epitomizes this dream and serves as a visual reminder of these values. THE PROPOSAL Project Scope: A dramatic bighorn sheep descends to the lower ridge line; it's decorative and colorful artistic expression, standing over 8 feet tall and approximately 3 feet wide. The ram is a life size and looks down across the Town. The solid bronze sculpture majestically descends a cliff like surface and stands eye-level of the viewer. The base interior has an armature of one-inch steel tubing welded to support the weight of bronze statue. The base exterior is composed of synthetic sculpted rock and outcrops. Materials: Pusch Ridge Majesty is fabricated from 3/8 inch steel support armature and bronze cast metal,prepared by Matthew Moutafis, Oro Valley artist. The sculpture will be cast bronze. Etching and coatings will be finished after the initial coating. The base outcrop rocks are cast resins, dyed and painted to match Pusch Ridge. Timeline: Sculpture will be completed approximately 11 - 12 months from signed agreement commencing May 15, 1999 to be completed approximately April 30,2000. Work commences on May 15, 1999 Scale model is finalized and approved by Town and Artist June 1 Scale model is cast into bronze and resins;delivered to Town July 5 Work begins on base of full scale sculpture armature, and application of plaster and clay Finished base mold is approved by Town and Artist September 13 Work begins on armature for BigHorn Sheep full-scale sculpture, plaster and clay application Finished life scale model is approved by Town and Artist December 20 Casting begins on base, finished and installed March 3,2000 Casting begins on Bighorn, sculpture installed by March 24, 2000 Final sculpture unveiling and dedication Sat. April 29,2000 Funding: 1. $45,000.Includes cost of sculpture, base, base materials, sculpture shipment to site,assembly, and installation, providing"turnkey" sculpture. Also includes one cast copy of model for the Oro Valley Town office. Additional cast copies of model for Oro Valley presentations or citizen ownership are available through Town of Oro Valley or Matthew Moutafis. 2. $15,000(1/3 of total)provided by the Town of Oro Valley available to the Artist in increments of$5,000 and available as the following installments: May 15, 1999 July 1, 1999 August 15, 1999 $30,000(2/3 of total), provided by private funding and citizen participation with the cooperation of Greater Oro Valley Arts Council. Funds to be distributed by the Town of Oro Valley Finance Department and available to the Artist as needed during the length of the project. 3. Cost includes all meetings and final approval from both Town of Oro Valley Public Works and Oro Valley Town Officials. All contributions to be administered by Town of Oro Valley.Initial and interim draws to be made available to Matthew Moutafis as needed. 4. Materials Cost Budget Construction and Armature: Base& Sculpture $4,000 Dyes&Acrylics 500 Bronze, small casting 1,500 Base casting 1,000 Bronze, large casting 21,000 Casting, Polymer Base 5,500 Steelwork Skeleton 3,500 Site Preparation 1,750 Insurance &Bonding 500 Students 3,750 Freight 500 Miscellaneous 1,500 $45,000 Artist's Participation: $25,000 Contributed Final Total $45,000 Signature for Sagebrush Design Matthew Moutafis Date Signature for Town of Oro Valley Date TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION GENERAL FUND FISCAL YEAR 1998-99 BUDGETED EXPENDITURES OPERATIONS&MAINTENANCE 4 CURRENT YEAR BUDGET YEAR 1997-98 ESTIMATED DEPARTMENT MANAGER 1998-99 COUNCIL DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL REQUEST REVIEW APPROVAL Outside Professional Services $ 25,500 $ 50,300 $ 33,200 $ 33,200 $ 33,200 Water and Sewage 40,000 39,500 39,500 39,500 39,5004 Waste Disposal Fees - 4,400 4,400 4,400 4,400 Recreation Programs 12,500 12,500 12,500 12,500 12,500 Equipment Repair&Maintenance 5,000 2,100 , 2,750 2,750 2,750, Grounds Repair&Maintenance 11,500 - 7,000 7,000 7,000 Equipment Rental 1,200 250, 500 500 500 insurance 13,822 13,822 13,822 19,866 19,866 Telecommunications 2,000, 5,025 4,000 4,000 4,000 Postage 2,000 1,980 3,000 3,000 3,000 Travel&Training 1,650 1,650 1,450 1,250 1,250 Memberships&Subscriptions 375 375 375 375 375 Office Supplies 1,300 2,500 2,000 2,000 2,000 Natural Gas&Electricity 44,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 f Gasoline&Oil 3,500 1,900 2,000 2,000 2,000 Non-capitalized Equipment 6,500 5,500 6,000 6,000 6,000 Uniforms 750 1,150 1,500 1,500 1,500 Field Supplies 18,000 23,200 , 22,000 22,000 22,000 Miscellaneous Other Operating1,350 4,300 4,300 4,300 Arts Advisory Board 48,000 50,000 49,800 49,800 49,800 Parks&Rec Advisory Board 3,000 3,000 16,225 16,225 16,225 Arts Projects 30,000 - . - 30,000 Vehicle Repair: 'aintenance - 500 51' 's s , Advertising 500 500 500 Printing&Binding - 500 500 500 I I I TOTAL 0&M EXPENDITURES $ 275,597 $ 270,502 $ 287,822 $ 293,666 $ 323,666 116 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 9 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: 05/05/99 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Jeffrey H. Weir, CED Economic Development Administrator SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE REGARDING DRAFT ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF CRITICAL HABITAT DESIGNATION FOR THE CACTUS FERRUGINOUS PYGMY-OWL. BACKGROUND: On February 24, 1999 the Council approved Resolution(R) 99-25 that supported the Pima County Sonoran Desert Wildlife Conservation Plan; supported the initial determination by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service that designation of critical habitat for the pygmy-owl was not prudent; and supported removal of critical habitat designation within the Town limits, additional field surveys to determine resource value of the habitat, the exchange of State-held lands to be designated as critical habitat and consultation between FWS and Town of Oro Valley staff. One of the items specifically identified in the resolution was the requirement that FWS complete an Economic Impact Analysis associated with the designation of critical habitat lands. The Economic Analysis has been completed and the final date for comments is May 15, 1999. SUMMARY: The Draft Economic Analysis of Critical Habitat Designation For The Cactus Ferruginous Pygmy-Owl has been completed. The authors of the analyses are members of the firm Industrial Economics, Incorporated, Cambridge, Massachusetts. The analysis concludes that there are NO economic impacts expected from critical habitat restrictions. Throughout the report the authors sate, "according to guidance from the FWS(Federal Fish & Wildlife Service) staff, critical habitat designation will place no restrictions on lands and activities beyond restrictions that already exist under the ESA (Endangered Species Act) listing of the pygmy-owl". On page 2 under the heading Consultation Under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act the authors state "In cases where a species has been listed without designation of critical habitat, (via telephone conversation with Mr. Mike Rigley, USFWS, Phoenix office on Thursday 4/29/99 approximately 80% of ESA's do NOT have critical habitat designated) FWS only determines whether the proposed action is likely to jeopardize the continued existence of the species. In cases where critical habitat has been designated, FWS also (my emphasis) determines whether the proposed action is likely to adversely modify critical habitat. " Later in the same paragraph, "Adverse modification of critical habitat is defined as any direct or indirect alteration that appreciably diminishes the value of critical habitat......is dependent on a number of variables, including type of project, size, location and duration. " If the authors conclusions are true as they have stated that there is NO difference between ESA designation and Critical Habitat designation then why are there additional determination variables? The recommendation is to incorporate 733,786 acres within the eight (8) units to be designated as critical habitat. The following is a table of ownership of the proposed 733,786 acres: Owner Total Acres Percentage of Total Federal Agencies 145,369 19.8% State Land 434,651 59.2% Note: This is 4.6% of all State lands. County Lands 18,109 2.5% Private Ownership 13 5,65 7 18.5% TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION PAGE 2 of 2 The study identifies critical habitat restrictions (once again IF there are no differences between ESA and Critical Habitat designation then why do the authors continuously reference additional restrictions) can only be imposed on the activities and uses of state, county and private lands when a"federal nexus" exists. A"federal nexus" exists if the activities or land uses of concern involve federal permits, federal funding, or other federal actions. Some examples quoted as warranting a"federal nexus" are 404 Permits (Army Corp of Engineers permits for waterways, dams, etc.); FHA funding, EPA storm-water permit or other federal actions. The analysis authors state on page 7 "The economic effects of designation of critical habitat consist of those factors affecting national income (i.e., national efficiency effects) and those economic and social impacts that are important on a local or regional level (i.e., regional economic impacts). Two significant points about local impacts addressed are the responses on pages 33-36. The authors totally disagree with the Elliott D. Pollack and Company impact analysis they prepared for the Southern Arizona Homebuilders Association wherein the study estimated that there is a potential for an $ 8.5 Billion loss within the region. The authors state that it is not reasonable to assume that current zoning would/could be changed from low density to higher density zoning. It is apparent that the authors have not observed the most recent re-zoning activities in Pima County over the past number of years. Secondly, the authors further state that they are supported in claiming that re-zoning should not be considered because Pima County has recently NOT allowed for some higher density rezoning. At the same time the authors have stated that the higher density residential development WOULD occur some where else in Pima County, even though they just quoted the denial of rezoning for higher density by Pima County. ATTACHMENTS: a. Resolution 99-25. b. Memorandum from Field Supervisor David L. Harrow, USFWS. c. Letter to USFWS. A copy of the 43 page Economic Analysis is available in the E. D. Administrators office. The web site address for downloading is: http://ifw2es.fws.gov/library. RECOMMENDATION: Staff would like the Council to consider authorizing the Mayor to sign and forward to the USFWS the attached letter expressing the Town's disagreement with the findings of the Draft Economic Analysis and stating their lack of support for the designation of the 733,786 acres included in the eight units as critical habitat. 4, ,I Jeffre, . Weir, CED Economic Development Administrator David L. Andrews Finance Director / I Chuck Sweet Town Manager RESOLUTION NO. (R) 99-25 RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY: A) SUPPORTING THE PIMA COUNTY SONORAN DESERT CONSERVATION PLAN IN THE MAJORITY, AND B) SUPPORTING THE ORIGINAL DESIGNATION OF THE FEDERAL FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE THAT A CRITICAL HABITAT DESIGNATION IS NOT PRUDENT AND C) SUPPORTING THE CONSIDERATION OF REMOVAL OF ANY AREAS WITHIN THE TOWN LIMITS DESIGNATED AS CRITICAL HABITAT BASED ON THE FEDERAL FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICES REQUIRED ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS WITH PARTICULAR REGARD TO THOSE SITES IN WHICH CONSIDERABLE INVESTMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE; ADDITIONAL FIELD SURVEYS TO DETERMINE THE RESOURCE VALUE OF THE HABITAT; THE EXCHANGE OF STATE-HELD LAND TO BE DESIGNATED AS CRITICAL HABITAT; AND CONSULTATION BY FEDERAL FISH AND WILDLIFE PERSONNEL WITH TOWN OF ORO VALLEY STAFF SECTION "A" WHEREAS, there is a growing public insistence that all levels of government become more responsive to citizen needs and desires; and WHEREAS, it is the determination of the Town Council that the preservation of the Sonoran Desert Environment is important to its citizens; and WHEREAS, a cohesive strategy for the preservation of the Sonoran Desert and endangered species is currently being established by Pima County; and WHEREAS, the Oro Valley Town Council does not want to create the extinction of any species, and WHEREAS, the Town Council agrees with the majority of the Pima County Sonoran Desert Conservation Plan, and SECTION "8" WHEREAS, the Town of Oro Valley currently has 2 5,45 5 residents, and WHEREAS, the Town has averaged double digit population percentage growth over the last nine years; is one of the fastest growing communities in the State of Arizona, and WHEREAS, the Town of Oro Valley has many planned area developments already in the process of being developed, and WHEREAS, the Town is urban in nature, and WHEREAS, the Town has already included areas for development in its General Plan for population increases and infrastructure improvements, and made such decisions affecting the future of the municipality based on these plans, and WHEREAS, the Oro Valley Town Council supports the initial determination of the Federal Fish and Wildlife Service that a critical habitat designation was not prudent, and WHEREAS, in support of the proposition that the designation was not prudent the Town provides the attached Exhibit "1 ", which is a compilation of the estimated economic hardships that will be suffered by some of the properties lying within Oro Valley or near it on the Map designated as Unit 4, and WHEREAS, the Oro Valley Town Council believes that the Federal Fish and Wildlife Service should in the future consult and work with the staff of the Town of Oro Valley before any such designation is made, and SECTION "C" WHEREAS, the Oro Valley Town Council can also support the consideration of the removal of the designation of critical habitat for appropriate areas within the Town limits of the Town of Oro Valley based on: 1 ) The Federal Fish and Wildlife's services required economic impact analysis with particular regard to those sites in which considerable investments toward future development have been made; 2) Additional field surveys to determine the resource value of the habitat 3) The exchange of State-held land to be designated as critical habitat 4) The consultation by the Federal Fish and Wildlife Service with the Town of Oro Valley Staff SECTION "D" NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by a majority vote that the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley and for the reasons listed in this resolution: A) Supports the Pima County Sonoran Desert Wildlife Conservation Plan in its majority, and B) Supports the initial determination of the Federal Fish and Wildlife Service that the designation of critical habitat was not prudent; and C) Supports consideration of the removal of a critical habitat designation within the Town limits based on an economic impact analysis with particular attention being paid to those sites in which considerable investments toward future development have been made; additional field surveys to determine the resource value of the habitat; the exchange of State-held lands to be designated as critical habitat; and the consultation by the Federal Fish and Wildlife Service with Town of Oro Valley Staff. PASSED AND ADOPTED by a majority vote of the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this 24th day of February, 1999. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA Paul H. Loomis, Mayor ATTEST: / F°. Kathryn E. Cuvelier, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ‘41/t Tobin Sidles, Town Attorney EXHIBIT "1" • ROBERT C. STIES 340 NORTH MAIN AVENUE TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701 PHONE: (520) 623-5466 FAX: (520)882-3909 February 24, 1999 David L. Harlow, Field Supervisor United States Department of the Interior Fish&Wildlife Service Arizona Ecological Services Field Office 2321 W. Ro aI alm Rd., #103 Phoenix, AZ 850214951 Re: Proposed Rule to Designate Critical Habitat for the Cactus Ferruginous Pygmy-Owl To: David L. Harlow Set forth below is the economic and social impact created by designating land within the La Cholla Sewer Improvement District as critical habitat. Casas Adobes Baptist Church The Casas Adobes Baptist Church has made a very significant commitment.to. serve the Tucson metropolitan area. Attached as Tab 1 is a list of the services provided to member of the church and the community at large. The following church activities are open to the communityat large: 1. Early Childhood Development Center - Full-day program for the working parent; Parent's Day Out (PDO) Program; Traditional Preschool Program 2. Children's Ministries - Children's Grades 1-5 Sunday School; Children's -`- Worship grades 1-3; AWANA; OANSA - AWANA in Mexico 3. Casas Adobes Baptist School - Kindergarten through 8th Grade program; Dance and Gymnastics Academy 4. Adults - Ladies -Wednesday Bible Class 5. Adults - Single - GOODLthE - Singles 55+; SYNERGY - Singles in their 30's; OPTIONS -Singles in 40-54; CIRCLE OF FRIENDS-Singles o0-60 6. Women's Ministries - CRAFTS; WOMEN'S WORLD AM; WOMEN'S WORLD PM;PRAYER 7. Music, Drama and the Arts Ministries -School of the Fine Arts David L. Harlow, Field Supervisor February 2� 1999 P � Page United States Department of the Interior Fish &Wildlife Service Arizona Ecological Services Field Office Re: Proposed Rule to Designate Critical Habitat for the Cactus Ferruginous Pygmy-Owl 8. Pastoral Care Ministries - Professional Counseling; Benevolence counsels clients crisis; g in economic Pre-Marital Counseling 9. Groups - Serenity Seekers; Codependency Support Group; Sexual Abuse P �Yu PP Therapy; Weigh Down Workshop; FamilyMembers & Caregivers of the Seriously Mentally III P � 10. Prayer Meetings - Mondays at 9:30 a.m. Senior Adults; Tuesdays at 6:00 a.m. Men's Prayer Breakfast; Wednesdays at 8:30 a.m. CABC Staff; Wednesdays 7:00 p.m. All Church; Thursdays 9:00 a.m. Ladies; Saturdays 7:15 a.m. Men 11. Missions Ministries - Hispanic Church at Casas Adobes Open- to Hispanic Co P Community 12. Library Schedule - Sunday 7 a.m. to 1:30P.m.; Wednesday 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Church facilities are available forP ublic use. Attached as Tab 2 is a preliminary development plan of the Kai Family Pro erty FP which is adjacent to the ChurchP P�ro outlined in red. The church has received strong interest from people retiring to Arizona to live in close proximity to the church. These retirees want to take advantage of the many ro ams sponsored by the church. Couples with children are very interested in Irvin in close proximity to the church because of itsg • • excellent day care and educational facilities. The church also desires to have residential facilities constructed in close proximityso that people living in such. • • facilities would have convenient access toro ams sponsored bythe church. P � P Presently the church has 150 employees, some part-time. The designation of the church � property as critical habitat will have a chilling impact on future plans of the church to serve the Tucson area and will cause millions of dollars of damage to the investment which has been made in contemplation of significant future improvements. The social and religious ous damages to the community by this curtailing of the ability of the church to develop future facilities is even more significant than any economic loss the church may suffer. The Tucson area desperately needs the services which P are being and will be provided by the Casas Adobes BaptistChurch. P The development plan for the Kai property responds to the desires of the Casas Adobes Baptist Church. Wilson School The Wilson School, K through 8, constructed at a cost of $20,000,000, which lies within the north portion of the sewer improvement district adds importantpublic P educational facilities making the land in the sewer improvement district highly desirable. P David L. Harlow, Field 24 1999 Supervisor UnitedP February Page 3 States Department of the Interior Fish &Wildlife Service Arizona Ecological Services Field Office Re: Proposed Rule to Designate Critical Habitat for the Cactus Ferruginous Pygmy-Owl Analysis of Damages to Other Property Lv ine in the Sewer Improvement District if said Sewer Improvement District PropertyDesignated is Desi ated as Critical Habitat The FWS made the following statement on page 2 of the Cactus FerruginousPygmy-Owl Protocol dated August 13,1998: "Areas of low-density development (lot sizes greater than 3 acres) should be considered suitable if the appropriate vegetation characteristics are present." The above statement by FWS mandates wildcat subdividing, which, over the years, has caused tremendous problems in Pima County. Property used for wildcat • P ty � subdividing has a value from $10,000 to $15,000er acre, with an absolute topof 520,000per acre. P e. Property Damages See the separate mounted map of the property lying within the sewer improvement district. Levitt Property This property lies adjacent to, and east of, Wilson School with frontage on La Cholla Boulevard. g The east two-thirds of the propertyhave been designated as business in the Oro Valley General Plan. The balance of the property, pursuant to the Oro ValleyP. P � , General Plan, may have a residential dense of 5 units per acre. Mr. Levitt's opinion of value •p is $100,000 er acre for 19.54 acres. value is added by the commercial designation in the Oro Valley General Plan. The development develo ment of Wilson School, Casas Adobes Baptist Church, and the development ofproperty east of La . Cholla Boulevard also influenced his opinion. If this property Ywas designated as critical habitat, the value would drop to $20,000per acre or a total damage of $80,000 times 19.54g acres which equals $1,5 3,000 in losses. Hadd Property • The Hadd property is directly south of the LevittroP erty but has no commercial designation. Across the street, roP sold for $50,000 per acre for a 40 acres with a 2 unit per acre platted subdivision. The Hadd property has a value of perp• P ' ' $50,000 , acre presently. per acre value of the property, is designated as critical • P P� � habitat will drop to no more $20,000per acre. The minimum damages are $30,000 • � times 17.77 acres which equals$533,1000 in losses. Property Represented by Greg Wexler Greg Wexler represents the ownership of 140.45 acres, which lies adjacent to Wilson School and has frontage on La Cholla Boulevard. The damages from designation as critical habitat will be $30,000per acre or$4,213,500. Because ofsize, the valueof ' the property is now $45,000 per acre. If designated as critical habitat this value David L.Harlow, Field Supervisor P February 24, 1999 Page 4 Unitedof the Interior States Department g Fish&Wildlife Service Arizona Ecological Services Field Office Re: Proposed Rule to Designate Critical Habitat for the Cactus Ferruginous Pygmy-Owl b will drop to $15,000 per acre. The minimum damages are $30,000 times 140.45 acres which equals $4,213,500 in losses. Greg Wexler also represents s the owners of 43.21 acres s with frontage on Lambert Lane lying west of the Kai ro . The damages to this roe is $30,000time $1,296, OQ �� g p p rty per acre 43.21 which equalsq in losses. Towns ciin Property The Townsdin roe consists of 13.22 acres and �Y is located at the northwest corner of La Cholla Boulevard and Naran•a Drive. The ' Towns $30,000 � n"n n'� damages for the din roperty is er acre or $30,000 times 13.22$396 600 in o Pacres which equals losses. Kai Property See Tab 2, properties to be developed have been labeled 1 through 6. The areas 1, 2, 5, and 6 all suffer damages of $30,000 per acre. Ifplaced in critical habitat, area 3 will suffer damages of ($100,000 • g . $80,0 0 per acre per acre is the present value of the if laced in critical property,, habitat, the value drops to $20,000per acre). The damages to area 4 � . g is 0,000 per acres. The value is presently $70,000per acre, if placed in critical habitat the value drops to $20,000 per acre. Parcels 3 and 4 have more valuable uses. Stewart Title &Trust Proverty Stewart Title &Trust as Trustee under Trust No. 2002 own the 151 acres lying y g a r. the southwest corner of Lambert Lane and La Cholla Boulevard. Ire resent the owners of said oroperty. The damages to this propertyare a minimum $3,020,000• . g of if placed in critical Habitat. The last three Countyplans show the corner of this propertyat Lambert Lane and La Cholla Boulevard to be commercial with a d apartments aj ac ent thereto. Lambert Lane and La Cholla Boulevard is a major intersection. Lambert Lane will be extended west to the Avra ValleyInterchange at 1-10. There areplans to extend La Cholla Boulevard g to I-10. The roads in the roe were abandoned on November5,1 984, see Tab property� 3, as a prelude to develop the roe in a more dense fashion when the time was ripe. P property�Y The Wilson School and Casas Adobes Baptist Church have made this area desirable for densemore P residential and commercial uses. 40 acres at the northeast corner of Lambert Lane and La Cholla Boulevard will be zoned as commercial byOro Valleypursuant to a previous p e ious action taken by the Board of Supervisors. Peter Fasseas, who owns the 160 acres at the southeast corner of Lambert Lane and La Cholla Boulevard, has futurelaps to build a significant develo ment on his property. PP Urban Core The La Cholla Sewer Improvement District property, lyingwithin Oro Valley is an important part of the urban core of Oro Valley for the following reasons: 1. All utilities and sewers are available; David L. Harlow, Field Supervisor . p February 24, 1999 Page 5 United States Department of the Interior Fish &Wildlife Service Arizona Ecological Services Field Office Re: Proposed Rule to Designate Critical Habitat for � the Cactus Ferruginous Pygmy-Owl 2. Lambert Lane and La Cholla Boulevard are s•major roadways; Y � 3. Dense development in Oro Valleyhas been developed east of La Cholla Boulevard • p across from the sewer improvement district; and 4. The construction of Wilson School and Casas Adobes Baptist Church have made this areap very attractive for residential and commercial development. Clearly property that isart of the urban core of a town should not be designated habitat. criticalp Total Damages to the Proverty by Being Placed in Critical Habitat LEVTIT PROPERTY: $80,000 x 19.54 Acres = $1,563,200 HADD PROPERTY: $30,000 x 17.77 Acres = $553,100 WEXLER PROPERTY $30,000 x 140.45 Acres = $4,213,500 WEXLER PROPERTY $30,000 x 43.21 Acres = $1,296,300 TOWNSDIN PROPERTY $30,000 x 13.22 Acres = $396,600 KAI PROPERTY: PARCEL 1 $30,000 x 30.30 Acres = $909,000 PARCEL 2 $3000 x 24.50 Acres = $735,000 PARCEL 3 $80,000 x 16.70 Acres = $1,336,000 PARCEL 4 $50,000 x 17.80 Acres = $890,000 PARCEL 5 $30,000 x 27.30 Acres = $819,000 PARCEL 6 $30,000 x 34.50 Acres = $1,035,000 STEWART TITLE PROPERTY $20,000 x 151 Acres = $3,020,000 . CASAS ADOBES BAPTIST CHURCH Caused by inability to $10,000,000 expand TOTAL DAMAGES $21,251022 Sincerely, / / -�-- ,r; ,• ,/rrol/i/ Lt./- Robert C. Stubbs RCS/j d .....1 ..,,,,... . .• . .•. t..d "- .... c.. • -----& -= :, -mi.:1m ---• L. - il . , 2 Plg liestr,,..} tu T. ., u cn- - -• ' 2 4 -a . . u......1..... . = et P.• E I -.02 a 4: i 2 " .• .-w, ...• CO .0, E I tS r i 2 g ek, 1 11-0.,i ii a a. = c 21..„... .4 c fa - it I i 1 I -i ;i .•••,:sf g ,5 4, 2 ,g a c e d I; g I ,,, i d 1 •4.1.iiif-t -,1 kiliee .t.1 ....171 cliiii233cli -Gli § a i i - -sag P ....a. i, cc co 6. ;,; "a 2 3 b• `-' to z -4 12 ITI '2 -1 4 = . u .......• 0 .... 4 , ...4- 2P. < co traU .E2ZZZZa. rrigagui2u3u u) 3 _...., .. L.1 La. .• .... u• rim rez,-.1: ..7 In Da--- •-..... ,......,T1 7 r-. TaliFit "it AM t" eti iz Z IN r-,-; li , l'--I S ISI 11E1 E I 111...i E L'..1 1 ..IIT .. L.1, ..... &li: :: ant,0 lanati 1.4,4 A F.....F.-76.741-.7c:i.-:-....,.. ..7- 1.1"4-1-.74E-.7114.-:--•t-...:___,____-÷-11:4".-----'---:=111112: -.7.1=,:r..:71.:•-.7-:!grriz.-:r............:..•. 1._:::::2f:HH::...;=:-.:E:17.,17.H••••.::---:::" .-........•=t-Z1.-:-:.."1:7----Fiaii:ZiEF''''''''''''"''''"'' Z';•,-=-,-• •-••=---Fiii= =-74-:F.---,-.--::...,.: i:..r- ''' 01. '''''----"::".,,---:,:::,==• •-,..::::::::::::.......-,.---.=,,--17.,---Trrr:".• 7...777.''4,:.---77-4-717;;7''''''''''''' :.-tr:=:--.3= .::.•.:::::'::.,EE::::---"----•-'::''---.n--." - • :::....-:-.-...:...,.....7"......1:-........,:?.......=.,..r.,,===Tr :: ..a.............-.1,r.r.,...=.......-7,....-: .....:-,.,==...Z=...-.. ........ ... ... ...... ....- . ••,..i...::-T,.....,•• •-.....-..,,,-_-_,•••• • . - -- -- :::::. • •• . '41'..ifiiiiP. ::......:=•.=. ,,......... .:.:,... .........:•.. • ii :iri.-'2.-fsittufwatits .g-i- L•.**..... 1..-.. ..........: :.:::.: • ... .. •• •. ..•.....•.....••.................... .....•_.•.................... .... --,-It:;:: --•'=-221-.3.7...... ... . ..... -.---- ::.:--.- :.-.,,:r.,,...,,,==,'SEL-•?-iiE...--- :-...---7:-:7"•-•-'::i-_-*-:-:. -- ---.. ••,•.,,....,..,•• ..1.14,tr :.,=,..: •.:••• : •- •:::•.. ...:••...:. •Fi.,+-==.7.4i.iFf:::.:.'Hii.==.1.: .....:.. :ilii •- ..Ir. ":F:',i'., :: ----- !!...... ( 41,ni.-.:: :-:-....-7.". .. .:.:. : .: :::.•:...: :*.:.*-..••• -7-gt..-0T---- -7:=7: 7.-7::1...-- -1 --. i, ''''....r"....,'.. . L. - -• "..'...:...:1:::i. oAle rricH Li ' iiii.tlif illiq-if: ... :I.::7 i ,EN..3a. , 1-igEt.-.V-F :::::1::::::1.... ri:-::7:-:::-.2.-_-----1:-.:....•-•!-.7::::---:•:..-.-1 :::::::::::::::::,--F.r.iirig • . • ;::.:.:...:.---,.... ...J .. . ••:•:. F---...-....-...••• .:-........,.7...-=--.-....,3 :.. ----•••.::•,•• ----... - •• . -:.•:::i :.: =---",-.".11:yS . •YNOld _,•-=.1-...-=:...::.. ::•. .. • . ..• . 1 . .• •• -• ,,,-.:::::.• •; : --•--.:..:_.--z-'7•_„=- •••••:...:........._.. I ._. .t.-÷7--:,..-..............;::..•...:.• . . . .:- :::,:•• ...I ..•••;•••.. ff.:ET'- *::.:***::: -:::•:1 :": ..•-. qINOMMNO .......,1111.Mem '''....."...3.:............ ... = .. , •- • ":"= .:h: : • -• . 77:: ,=,:_ tE:231$1.$4t,NI' cc it •:1 .••••• .. :.:• ::7:7 ; lif .. -::....., • . •••• ••• ......:••• i:,.."...-:::-.. •••LA.:::......... ,....... -•-1... • •• .•• ...or -- • •.„• --.:Fr=7.--S-7 •••••••: cc•:••••-: wt.:-•I • • .*:-• . :;: ::, •• '+-:--FL-T4:444 • -ft......:'......ii::-.:--........--cc ii•inli • -.:: --ii..i...:•• "---__. ••- ,,j . ....,....... • •• .s. . _ per:011V- • . •• ,-_-„„ ..... .... ';,-,,..:3,...,::•„a:-..:,-.7,-:::: __ p.,. .F....-.:1YCIAtitifjiii. ..Ac .:::•:: •••. , tr.- .v,,:-...;,.. .:::'.......I. •:,--- ai...,..,...........- •!i i,,:....... •: :Fi, _____,- . • • .. 2 _...............E .----" ::,::-.-- -.2---__..4-i• ,,=?•:?,••,. - .. z • .:).14:..,,. z. ---:------:= 1.-----.... - __-___L--L--.4 U. :............ - 6.-.,‘• ••,...f!rd.......- •• •.%. ••...77:411 •,•'',-.71fr 4'•---=1.--------------ii '.7.-- •--.=•--• • ...1 .. ....- .,..g.,•:•:••- A.r.• PI.,.........,:--..44.2= ...... ..1....,.... a_ . ---.: e-7,-....T, ::: :,:.....-.•..k.m....t......•-••-.. ,..:,:••k.• ,., . P - '. • Min iii:,4..-z.-....,:-=•:•:-.: ,,ek .. F,.s::QN i 3:.:::7::.. •. • ....:i,••.6. • Y.A•Tt,..t... ..."'" 0.4 . IffraF.T.:'•:Ar.---- ..___,_ ' ...,..., -4,-.:::..i . ••' ...• - •• ::•••••••.. zere -• •-•'...›.1.-.-•!.. ,}.., un i.. ..L.T.:.-:-..:...::..-•-... ..,r--- ---,_,- ,...11.• ••... 7...=----:.:-..-_..:-_,- . ,. -- . __ • . , . -'''' :i-:i•: .N .••...... .•, ..,,,...,..,......, ..,,,,:...... :........1 ..:.,-..,:.... -1 . 4 -7=-.7--::-.7-r:i Iffilizr.=..ii• =-F=r.. 7.-=.----y•-uft=..,---,--.,-;:-..,-,:...i"=;11:1;NVKLUVW:,: --F------ '-'- - -.• ,. ---,---:T7.-7172-4t. .. - -:: - - ,...-F-.4,-',_--:.-,-:-_,..ii, •• ••••••••-:2".--:-•- •••• -.-.- • -...:',,,, .-:-. .T..-,-----1-----7.-_.7-.:-;;;;_.-2...rit-r_774 ---=•.= =- .1 ..-.-..,.-... .,..,,,,,•• .............. •---7:... -.L._:.:.:.-.,...,...: ,....t::::i::....,•:::i=:„."--;;;-7-.7:.;;:-..;:-.."-T- -• - -..,-- . r.......i.,.-,..K,,.., ...___ i F-=---------=';*-::FTETF:1 i "... 1 z:=-----'-- - •=1 .-.,:,-,_......_z.,-.-- ,.:•::. ..-......?..•_.;_;•"",'- • ....,-%..,,,..%:••-••• •• -.2.-,1-i,. ..------•=- .H._ _ -7,777 ii:ii.4T.:4-:2;iii.•-_,, ..... . • .."=. ....:•'. • ::;;;::.,:i.,....:.,-...,-••..-....... ..- • ..1.--....,•-•.=.-.:.--.:....---=•-•;::.:-:•-•-,- -4--;...4.i...-:-.2. 1 nr•-•_ • ;:,....,. ...„:,..., •,....•,..,,.... . . .•... ......T. .... .......... ...:, ..,..:,,• . !i L..:=••.••.• ....i:it i..................".........4.. E.:71 g=LE E.i: ::.......::.".......••==.t-...-.:-!in-t i-17-------:--, --- :,---,-,..-----:-."),.-., •::::: -..........--?.....T,-,_:.. ---: '1 I 2 7-----7:::-4 7-.71 7 7 a .:i-,----;,,,,,-.-::'i,T-4F-=-== ''...-',,::-.Iciell ;'- ,'.2..*:.1.-;.••=•:••' •'a r...T.2.....i • .11.......11F,• -.: *F17:: ii.--:41:=--.... =:=:•-•:.=, . =-----•=i;•,,,,--...i.:-_- -----* - ._. .-- •-:: --r•.-7-1.7-7 •: ...7--74:-..".:--: ' .. 7.-...74,.....T--------:,=-------,-,---1--•--• .:=-' .....1.-7---: •..-.:=.-=•- - • ••••.--.... .• ___ _ ----- .7,,,.....---=.---...--.....--,•• •••••:1_,----,..;,•-•...-.., --.:, ..4.--":•••• ...--• -- '..7",• -.Old aavm ...... .....-...,=-.-...7........... ...:., ===o...-=-. . •-r.:-..=--:r-••• ....,•=ii z-..- --;7.1-•-- -, :•••::::.. -... _ 474_7:7:-.7..___-:E. ••....•-tnr• .:7=---- .=.7.71•:=.:--,...---:-.:_. '•,.±.-::7-7:••• :::••••••21-2i7;:i;:t.• '' Ei.:•..:.. ..7:.....-,:.::'•'' .• . •::. 4:(c -,••••••:,:• ...=: ••-...• • .---=--•....-1...;_.....7.••---- .--:-:,.- =:Er....7-1.7--:.-ilii:2::::...... '-=':E• Z . :----:=1:F--r---:::-..=iiii.•-----' .:!..-:•:12- ....-7:F'-' ..••••••--.:- .-'' viI .•„,;:.- -., -....-:,...,.:., ,:, - ,- -:• ...,:i_....i..........?,__::. ..--__ .............____=..• .......„..._ . ....,.. .....4,, f-i•.7-..•...1.t a- •- •.: •• •l•...,•- - -,i...-7::::::::••••••:-.=4;4.•--• :;•••••.•••••-Fair..-F=.---::::,••• -=--• mi..... .. , •-, ' ... ......... ., ..--:::-...,-.:,-........-••=•••:.::::::•-----......_.-.-....•••::•-•=-1.....-....:-.1,--,-•• - •.•••,-;, i,4:-:.":•••• •,...-.E...÷.-•,..i....-.....nri,..--..r...---........-........::=MI.= •--.-•... • - ..,„+:............... .7...-........=.: :===.7.1...-....- ----'--"-..,... Th. ..1. ........• ',7..,::::-.-==:::1.7:E.:::-:-.7i.:Fi:iiiiii...:Iii.77.1::-E.............1::•:.-iF.......:"7:::=-Frali - •••'':.- •-• a! '2,7 r. _-..iii , ...,,.--,. ..;,-, Nil,k, . . .. ..,.....,,., ....... .•.•••_......... .stefidlital j..:--•:-4,---:i...:::-..a:-Zil---17..i....74....-14:1-:-.L.::::::7-.L.:2:-s-1:..r...%=...........:.:=-1....-...:7 ,,....., .-.4.-- A..... :-....iiiii,,,,,....i....1--,ziii.i.,:::rt.tur.......•-.-..•.:47,1-72.-:-;•:::i.:1- ......-÷.-. . ... ••• • • . . •• tr•-•=-....7-,..;-...7_--F-.-...: :171.EF•Eii--.7.-:-Frir,i'.7:th...--,7:-...r.....----.7--.7-.-7.7.1 .:.• -...-s• •.: .••••-•..3-7....-.........----...:1:-..-..............=11.=,.....,... .=al= ...,:r. ,.,i•:, .::21..;;•:•eif: :....•..:-,..,..-...............=1.7.9.,,7.........Fir.t..,...i.::-.....--",.=:.=F.i.C.= .4.1.* il' .".":'!T,7k.'.'',... •••4e• ..-F.....--i..!::=.....:Fliii Er.T....-1F,.....rr::-*.1'..-FiR.'i..-T.-lr.i-::-.-'-': •w-.•• - •• .",•••,..•:,•-..tr r.-nr+-....7.rr.r...Tra...-:-IHS...:..-...-.-....-....,-.: .•'''' &•.Vt..i4••`.: .....*-43'.,-: ..... •=.--7---..:::-.-_:---.F.. .....-1.....--..-...s..-:::-:-.......- AA --.: .^'--..,• -.•• liFfit-77.......,:=7,..„_ 7.-;__,,,:4::::',,,.;;;`=--::i.'''T .-i.."••••%,;'•':'.<;1;" ::E11:......777;42.3.1 .. -----.-4--,4 --=........--••• . k---.a,...----.---.. .F.:4.-4:4--•:-=-7-44, -i-, ,..T.F.,.. ,i.-% S...7..4-.:iC.:•Tr-.t if 7C.W:•'i41111.1'l ,:7 ;•---....••;:.".i:,::....,,,,,- •::•.•;•• ••• mri...w.::,......,:-..iip.... ....-7:.....L....,-z-...-_-:-..... 7:.....1x7:,..4. , r, :.... .-,10t.,;,-,...i.r:,: ,i4-,,,, ,,itl. -..... . ..,...,- .-- -...,..::.: . - --- . _.. - ••----••.....::: ,i=......:=--..=•:-. -f:.-----,-:=-Tm- g.r. '1:4 ,r 144,-, _A.,.. ..,, 47:47. •-•;,,,.. ...-4--,._--‘1,,,.-1,,,'", -------;:•:-:.:iiiit,....--.:"--- --- ....... :.::• • :3:2=71_.-...-mssr.rrn=====.....g. •:' •,:•,:;,. -.37:r .'f.7,• „,fr.-15-,-,,c,..,-..,,, .. . ......--. ..------- .........,- 7......-.....-.....-..-.......: 7.4.:: ,VJ F;.f..-ir.t1;;', "'54''''..4 j-1. .......... -11 . .. __., .%.-O..'•.,A• ..,.- ,..,,,___ ..•, ••• I :. •...••... (..),, ,.....,/-bet..Z,:,,,,,;:-.a 4 ......•....----•::. .,.::..--::.... :1,"- ---- ..,_,--. ..-.1*---r-,=u1=1,- ' t •.Acom:lit. , ,,.43...4i,. - .. •'"1 ,..*•-.T.,,,s..,.... le e.-.;,,-.. .. ...1. :: . , --.__.....::-_-_ -___rjiii•11- '.1.-6--, .:=- "----,_:•-r,.;.ii:.- .. ,- ' ,c1r,.-7--1.‘Crir:C1 fi.--....--. 1.1.' .n: •... ---.:.. '-...- .... :m•-i-: .**,---7" ...ii CY:47''.4.• 4-..71-...';*.r.-"ZZ:-;1:.s. 1.1••••1.' .r.;•--i70- I.f.....--x- . =•:-.----....--::::::, .::4-::...7. ...,..;:a.ff,' ..,:,.;:',.-7,-,,:ftli-t'fr. Mi' •'-'"1.'z'ai-1*''re'r,-41:'•; *--'''''''.;='` t..-:::=:::-+::_--1, .:i.::-::--r- .,.F.;:-.ir • ;;:7:':''-Z".•'''.i;r A' - .-7:,C,I.....7-,.-W,';,.- -11i; =:::::::31, .rs--=• :-.., -,4,1 testr•lii? ''' PA. V:•...-',i•..;.•'•.,•,---J4i 4'. •.... ME--. ;iii-ifF. ;:t• ':,..;:::,-.1.? l'.it.4'1". ' '; rill th:.:.;,!:t;- -1-.=..i.,:L.11 :1.1-. .. :::::.•• .. •,...• tir:'7?f•ern,,•...,,,i.--77.7117.iljg • 74/ --- --•••• .... :47-'••••• .4.41- --..•,.,‘"ri,:=•.- :....:- :tiiiiir ...:..,,,-7,7,-:. t as:, .:i...., : ..-..:-...t...).. .f. --_ •.,'. . -., - :., •nt g?..L.'rVi,'i:TA',74%.1,-4,T,1' =!:.!•------ """: :::. ,..- --lit,i-,,;. .,::: - -•••-,..' 4.--,”_::.,4 r • ......,-=,..E t...--. ..:, ;4461.:-..._.-7•.•%,:4, , p_.-- .. 4,,r.:., t....,.;',2.-;&',-''.-',--A---.141.i.„44-4,1'w a'I P5::-:***-2 ••:. .:iiti;ili. '.;::- .f:c...:7....,..;',:l... , I€-7:a::^1,94-,..s,.f,,,,, ,,(1.:2' '416t,'11:1-L'ibg 1;•:,-. 7.: ........ .•:::: I NI . - -•.- ::. ... 7 •-..5.,,,:.i:-,••:,,,ex;!..,.;Ci- `,...1,42:1,'"Wi .•:...-- ..k._:4;:t-.,,,z, %,:•,-,.:,:-,.:••••.-,./iiiaii.,a ..*;:, Li - i• . .•• I ifi.5 J.:ego-4.1w-.-,.,-c-_,,..•../.'„-:,,-...7-240,,-.4t-..,•;,3 'ilk- 1 • .2.„ ,,--- ..... • .;4-,.,.., ,r..-i i. - - • it,..,,,,.., ma .-...,_ , .".....4.. .....,. 0 .. 1.,..,1,1,,• -.._. .,-.z .. :.:•.-..• ,--*;•--:,-,,..t.-...-- . aj 44- I , ..._. i I . I . . .-a.-••••`, ?:.T..-:77 .. : -*.* _,:„t! -,•.• -_-.,,- 1 11.03. • Vrp.: ...., .#,..... -.i.,,,,,,. I • /1 1 o.• - •( ,.a t.N.,...•% i NO&, ',WT.,. :Nr, , I , • ..•-, ,t,:1',#.-'•• .4l.:r.r 1 'Pt; ,-. ,-- '/ : I . . 1 .' . 1,.. _,,,.. ,:_.•_. .•.. . • ,...... .......,„,„ ..1._- _,,...- .,. ,.._ ,.. :,... 1 __.., A4....,..:., _..,, ........, r., •I••c. ..-- ::!:•-•; 4L- '-.„ O '. O 7 ,l ' ,.-5.4 a. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY I =, 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE -7 �,� �. ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA 85737 M, -fir - ,:. Administrative Offices(520)297-2591 Fax(520)297-0428 -- www.ci.oro-valley.az.us °UN DED A9 May 5, 1999 itt -Nti,ci Mr. David L. Harrow * ..' Field Supervisor U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2321 West Royal Palm Road Suite 103 Phoenix, Arizona 85021-4951 Re: Draft Economic Analysis of Critical Habitat Designation for the Cactus Ferruginous Pygmy-Owl Comments. Dear Mr. Harrow, This letter provides comments concerning the Draft Economic Analysis of Critical Habitat designation for the Cactus Ferruginous Pygmy-Owl. • The economic impact determinations failed to include consideration for"stranded" infrastructure for the Town of Oro Valley. In accordance with the existing General Plan adopted in 1996 major investments have been completed and committed to by the Town in anticipation of continued (and desired) growth to and within the western boundaries of the Town. • The study consistently contradicts the authors findings, i.e., stating that critical habitat designation will place NO restrictions on lands and activities beyond restrictions that already exist under the ESA listing of the pygmy-owl and then at many other places within the study using the wording critical habitat restrictions. This is contradictory and obviously a significant error on the authors part. • In the report section on page 2 heading Consultation Under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act the authors state ""In cases where a species has been listed without designation of critical habitat, FWS only determines whether the proposed action is likely to jeopardize the continued existence of the species. In cases where critical habitat has been designated, FWS also determines whether the proposed action is likely to adversely modify critical habitat."Later in the same paragraph, "Adverse modification of critical habitat is defined as any direct or indirect alteration that appreciably diminishes the value of critical habitat is dependent on a number of variables, including type of project, size, location and duration."If the authors conclusions are true as they have stated that there is NO difference between ESA designation and Critical Habitat designation then why are there additional determination variables? vies 41' May 5, 1999co)?‘ f, Page 2 Mr. David L. Harrow Field Supervisor U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ➢ The study attempts to downplay the likelihood that private lands would be impacted due to the lack of a "federal nexus". Given the long reach of the federal government and once again referring to items directly quoted in the study, i.e., A"federal nexus" exists if the activities or land uses of concern involve federal permits, federal funding, or other federal actions. Some examples quoted as warranting a "federal nexus" are 404 Permits, FHA funding, EPA storm-water permit or other federal actions. More than likely a "federal nexus" would exist or if NOT would require some, and most likely an extensive, time to determine IF a "federal nexus" did exist. ➢ The study's conclusion that there would be NO economic impact due to critical habitat designation in the region appears once again be contradictory; that it is not reasonable to assume that current zoning would/could be changed from low density to higher density zoning. It is apparent that the authors have not observed the most recent re-zoning activities in Pima County over the past number of years. Secondly, the authors further state that they are supported in claiming that re-zoning should not be considered because Pima County has recently NOT allowed for some higher density rezoning. At the same time the authors have stated that the higher density residential development WOULD occur some where else in Pima County, even though they just quoted the denial of rezoning for higher density by Pima County. ➢ The elected officials and staff of the Town of Oro Valley have consistently offered to meet with the FWS to discuss critical issues and still await your response. It is apparent that the FWS does NOT understand the importance of continued residential growth, as determined by the community's residents, on the future economic well being of our community. Paul Loomis, Mayor Town of Oro Valley este:4 7.ry uniceu estates vepartmeni or acne Inter q 101 �+ — 9 U.S. Fish and 'Wildlife Service r74, . . 2321 W. Royal Palm Road, Suite 103 Phoenix _ �--�-�' Arizona zona 8021 4951 602 640-272 ( ) 0 FAX (602)640-2730 In Reply Refer To: AESO/SE April 15, 1999 Memorandum To: Interested Parties and Agencies From: Field Supervisor Subject: Availability of Economic Analyses for Proposals to Designate Pygmy-owl gand Huachuca Water Umbel Critical Habitat The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service announces the availability of the draft economic analyses for the proposals to designate critical habitat for the cactus pygmy-owl ferruginous m -owl g and the Huachuca water umbel. Both draft analyses are available on the Service's web site at http://ifw2es.fws.gov/library or by writing me at the above address. Additionally, the Service has reopened the comment period for bothro osals through P P g May 15, 1999. We are seeking comments on the draft economic analyses and on the proposals to designate critical habitat. If you have already provided comments on the proposals, you need not resubmit your comments. The Service received some comments on the proposals after the close of the original comment periods. These late comments will be incorporated into the public record as a part of this reopening and do not need to be resubmitted. Your comments must be received by May 15, 1999, to be considered in the final economic analyses and in the final critical habitat designation decisions. Thank you for your assistance in the Service's mission to conserve endangered plants and wildlife. X221 v avid L. Harlow Attachment econ analyses ltr:JAH:jh