Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Packets - Council Packets (1578)
AGENDA ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION SEPTEMBER 1, 1999 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11,000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS — TOWN MANAGER The Mayor and Council may consider and/or take action on the items listed below: ORDER OF BUSINESS: MAYOR WILL REVIEW THE ORDER OF THE MEETING CALL TO AUDIENCE —According to the Arizona Open Meeting Law, the Town Council may only discuss matters listed on the Town Council Agenda. Matters brought up by the public under "Call to Audience" cannot be discussed by the Town Council as they have not been placed on the agenda. Any items must be addressed to the whole Council, not a specific member. In order to speak during "Call to Audience'; please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. 1. CONSENT AGENDA (Consideration and/or possible action) A. Minutes -August 18, 1999 B. Police Report, July 1999 C. Building Safety Division Activity Report, July 1999 D. Finance Report for Month Ended July 1999 E. Postponement of the September 15th, 1999 regular meeting to September 22nd, 1999 due to the League of Arizona Cities & Towns Conference F. Resolution No. (R) 99-87 Awarding a Contract Proposal to WestLand Resources, Inc. for a Preliminary Site Investigation and Land Acquisition for an F-Zone Reservoir and Route Study for a 16" Supply Pipeline G. Resolution No. (R)99- 88 A resolution authorizing the amendment of an Intergovernmental Agreement with the State of Arizona concerning traffic signal maintenance H. OV12-97-18A Approval of Brake Max at Oro Valley Retail Center Public Art Proposal located along Oracle Road between First Avenue and Pusch View Lane I. OV12-98-1A Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 11 Stone Canyon Golf Course Temporary Clubhouse and Recreation Center Landscape Plan, located west of Rancho Vistoso Blvd., one mile north of Vistoso Highlands Drive J. OV12-99-01 Villages of La Canada Final Plat, located on the northeast corner of Congressional Way and north La Canada Drive K. 0V12-99-08 Oro Valley Retail Center Block 8 Development Plan, located northwest and adjacent to Oracle Road L. 0V12-99-10 Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 10, Parcel N Model Homes Development Plan, located west and adjacent to Rancho Vistoso Blvd. and east and adjacent to Hidden Springs Drive M. OV12-99-10 Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 10 Parcel N Model Homes Landscape Plan, located north and adjacent to Vistoso Village, east of Hidden Springs Drive, south of vacant land, and west of Rancho Vistoso Blvd. N. Reappointment of Public Art Selection Committee for CDO Riverfront Park & the new Development Services Building 2. APPOINTMENT OF WATER UTILITY COMMISSION MEMBERS 3. APPOINTMENT OF BUDGET & BOND COMMITTEE MEMBERS 4. APPROVAL OF ADDITIONAL MEMBERSHIP TO THE ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE LANDS ORDINANCE (ESLO) PUBLIC ADVISORY COMMITTEE 5. PUBLIC HEARING — 0V12-99-07 GRADING EXCEPTION REQUEST FOR LA CANADA/LAMBERT COMMERCIAL CENTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LA CANADA DRIVE AND LAMBERT LANE)(CONTINUED FROM 08/04/99) 6. OV12-99-07 LA CANADA/LAMBERT LANE COMMERCIAL CENTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LA CANADA DRIVE AND LAMBERT LANE)(CONTINUED FROM 08/04/99) 7. OV12-99-7 LA CANADA DRIVE AND LAMBERT LANE COMMERCIAL CENTER LANDSCAPE PLAN (PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LA CANADA DRIVE AND LAMBERT LANE)(CONTINUED FROM 08/04/99) 8. PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION NO. (R)99-89 INCREASING SERVICE FEES AND CHARGES FOR THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY 9. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-45 OV9-99-51 PARCEL #224-24-0120 AND PARCEL#224-24-0130, TRANSLATING AND REZONING RECENTLY ANNEXED LAND KNOWN AS THE HALLAQ PROPERTIES, FROM PIMA COUNTY CB-1, TR AND CR-2 TO ORO VALLEY C-2, R-6 AND R1-10, WITH CONDITIONS (PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LAMBERT LANE AND LA CHOLLA BLVD. (CONTINUED FROM 08/04/99) 10. RESOLUTION NO. (R)99- 86 APPROVAL OF MODIFICATIONS TO THE PROPOSED INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH PIMA COUNTY REGARDING THE UTILIZATION OF COUNTY BOND PROCEEDS TO DEVELOP THE ORO VALLEY PUBLIC LIBRARY (CONTINUED FROM 08/18/99) 11. OV12-98-1A RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 11 STONE CANYON GOLF COURSE TEMPORARY CLUBHOUSE AND RECREATION CENTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PROPERTY LOCATED WEST OF RANCHO (PROPERTY LOCATED WEST OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD, ONE MILE NORTH OF VISTOSO HIGHLANDS DRIVE) 12. PUBLIC HEARING-LIQUOR LICENSE APPROVAL FOR QUINCY ZHANG/HARVEST MOON CHINESE RESTAURANT, 12985 N ORACLE RD., SUITE 125 13. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-47 PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED, CHAPTER 3, CRITERIA, AS IT PERTAINS TO RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE AD HOC COMMITTEE ON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 14. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-48 OV12-94-32, SUNRIDGE II IN-LIEU FEE PROPOSAL, LOCATED % MILE EAST OF LA CANADA DRIVE AND 1/2 MILE NORTH OF TANGERINE ROAD 15. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-4909-99-112 REQUEST TO AMEND THE RANCHO VISTOSO PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT (PAD), REQUIRING SIDEWALKS ON BOTH SIDES OF RANCHO VISTOSO BLVD. FOR ALL FUTURE DEVELOPMENT 16. PUBLIC HEARING — ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-50 OV9-99-113 REQUEST TO AMEND THE RANCHO VISTOSO PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT (PAD), TO ADD THE DATE PALM TO THE APPROVED PLANT MATERIALS LIST 17. PUBLIC HEARING — ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-51 AMENDMENTS TO THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED, CHAPTERS 2, DEFINITIONS, AND 9, CONDITIONAL USE REGULATIONS, LOCATIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR CONVENIENCE USES 18. APPOINTMENT OF MEMBER TO THE PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD TOWN MANAGER'S REPORT ENGINEER'S REPORT FINANCE DIRECTOR'S REPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S REPORT POLICE CHIEF'S REPORT WATER UTILITY DIRECTOR'S REPORT COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS CALL TO AUDIENCE— According to the Arizona Open Meeting Law, the Town Council may only discuss matters listed on the Town Council Agenda. Matters brought up by the public under "Call to Audience"cannot be discussed by the Town Council, as they have not been placed on the agenda. Any items must be addressed to the whole Council, not a specific member. In order to speak during "Call to Audience", please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. ADJOURNMENT POSTED: 08/25/99 4:30 P.M. Ih A packet of agenda materials as listed above is available for public inspection at least 24 hours prior to the Council meeting in the office of the Town Clerk between the hours of 8:30 a.m. — 5:00p.m. The Town of Oro Valley complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If any person with a disability needs any type of accommodation, please notify Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk, at 297-2591. INSTRUCTIONS TO SPEAKERS Members of the public have the right to speak during any posted public hearing. However, those items not listed as a public hearing are for consideration and action by the Town Council during the course of their business meeting. Members of the public may be allowed to speak on these topics at the discretion of the Chair. If you wish to address the Town Council on any item(s) on this agenda, please complete a speaker card located on the Agenda table at the back of the room and give it to the Town Clerk. Please indicate on the speaker card which item number and topic you wish to speak on, or if you wish to speak during "Call to Audience", please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. Please step forward to the podium when the Mayor announces the item(s) on the agenda which you are interested in addressing. 1. Please state your name and address for the record. 2. Speak only on the issue currently being discussed by Council. Please organize your speech, you will only be allowed to address the Council once regarding the topic being discussed. 3. Please limit your comments to 3 minutes. 4. During "Call to Audience" you may address the Council on any issue you wish. 5. Any member of the public speaking must speak in a courteous and respectful manner to those present. Thank you for your cooperation. A. MINUTES ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION AUGUST 18, 1999 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11,000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE dV41* REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Paul Loomis, Mayor Dick Johnson, Vice Mayor Paul Parisi, Council Member Fran LaSala, Council Member Wayne Bryant, Council Member EXECUTIVE SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM MOTION: A MOTION was made by Vice Mayor Johnson and SECONDED by Council Member LaSala to go into Executive Session at 6:00 p.m. Mayor Loomis announced that in addition to the Town Manager, the Town Clerk and the Town Attorney, the Town Engineer would join Council in Executive Session for Item 3. The Executive Session was called for the following purpose: 1. Pursuant to ARS 38-431.03(A)(3)to obtain legal advice relating to Tortolita v. Town of Oro Valley Cause No. 328365/1-CA-CV 00-0022 and related matters. 2. Pursuant to ARS 38-431.03(A)(3)to obtain legal advice relating to possible intervention into the City of Tucson v Grant Woods and Pima County et al, defendants, [Committee to Incorporate, Inc. and Committee to Incorporate the Town of Tortolita, defendant-intervenors] (Pima County Cause No. 32-0926) 3. Pursuant to ARS 38-431.03(A)(3)to obtain legal advice relating to possible settlement with Pulte Homes regarding construction of a median cut on Rancho Vistoso Boulevard in, at or near Neighborhood 5, Parcel T, in Rancho Vistoso Motion carried, 5 - 0. MOTION: A MOTION was made by Council Member Bryant and SECONDED by Council Member LaSala to go out of Executive Session at 6:45 p.m. Motion carried, 5 — 0. RESUME REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER— 7:30 p.m. 8/18/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 2 ROLL CALL PRESENT: Paul Loomis, Mayor Dick Johnson, Vice Mayor Paul Parisi, Council Member Fran LaSala, Council Member Wayne Bryant, Council Member PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Loomis led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS Town Manager Chuck Sweet reviewed the upcoming meetings. CALL TO AUDIENCE Barbara Smith, 13600 N. Como Drive, stated that the Town of Tortolita still exists. She stated that Oro Valley should not move any further on issues in the disputed area until the Courts make their final decision. Alan Lathrem, 1750 W. Tangerine Road, stated that the extension of La Canada Drive would not happen as planned as the property lies within the Town of Tortolita. Kevin McHugh, 1651 W. Limewood, stated that the property of the Copper Mountain Assembly of God Church being considered for Springboard lies within or near an endangered species critical habitat. He asked that Council not act on the issue regarding the Springboard until more studies are completed. Ken Smith, 13 600 N. Como Drive, relayed a story portraying Oro Valley, Tortolita, and Tucson and a scenario regarding incorporation and annexation. 1. CONSENT AGENDA At the request of Council Member Bryant, Mayor Loomis pulled Items C, D, and E from the Consent Agenda. MOTION: Council Member LaSala MOVED to APPROVE the Consent Agenda, Items,A, B, F, G, H, and I. Council Member Parisi SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 —0. A. Minutes, August 4, 1999 B. Finance Report for Month Ended June 1999 C. Resolution No. (R)99-82 Acceptance of a License Agreement to clarify the maintenance and construction responsibilities for the First Avenue storm drains associated with Home Depot 8/18/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 3 D. Resolution No. (R)99- 83 Accepting that portion of Woodburne Avenue between Arrowsmith Drive and Rancho Vistoso Boulevard as a public street (PULLED FOR DISCUSSION) E. Resolution No. (R)99- 84 Accepting the Final Location Report for the La Canada Drive Extension from Tangerine Road to Moore Road (PULLED FOR DISCUSSION) F. OV 12-97-24, Giant, Phase I of the Plaza at Rancho Vistoso, Public Art G. Substitute Assurance Agreement between Nancy Properties and Lawyers Title of Arizona as Trustee of OV12-92-09 Naranja Ranch I Lots 84, 125-131, 141- 150, 132, 133, 135-140, 160-170 H. Notice of Completion, Project No. WOV #1-0199 OV-1 Town of Oro Valley Oro Valley Water Utility Interconnect Priority A, Main Extensions I. Notice of Completion, Project No. WOV #1-0399 OV-1, Town of Oro Valley Oro Valley Water Utility Interconnect Priority A-Miscellaneous PRV and Valve Installations C. RESOLUTION NO. (R)99-82 ACCEPTANCE OF A LICENSE AGREEMENT TO CLARIFY THE MAINTENANCE AND CONSTRUCTION RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THE FIRST AVENUE STORM DRAINS ASSOCIATED WITH HOME DEPOT In answer to a question from Council Member Bryant, Town Engineer Bill Jansen explained that Home Depot will be installing and maintaining the drainage. He stated that the drainage would cross from the north side to the south side and would accommodate all the development going in on the north side of First Avenue. MOTION: Council Member LaSala MOVED to APPROVE Resolution No. (R)99-82. Vice Mayor Johnson SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 —0. D. RESOLUTION NO. (R)99-83 ACCEPTING THAT PORTION OF WOODBURNE AVENUE BETWEEN ARROWSMITH DRIVE AND RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD AS A PUBLIC STREET In answer to a question from Council Member Bryant, Town Engineer Bill Jansen stated that the streets are currently up to the Town's standards and Code. He further explained that the maintenance fee is the annual cost of maintaining the street as a public street. Mr. Jansen also explained that once the street is turned over to the Town, the Town has the authority to enforce speed limits and to take jurisdictional control of the street. MOTION: Vice Mayor Johnson MOVED to APPROVE Resolution(R)99-83 accepting that portion of Woodburne Avenue between Arrowsmith Drive and Rancho Vistoso Boulevard as a public street. Council Member LaSala SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 —0. E. RESOLUTION NO. (R)99-84 ACCEPTING THE FINAL LOCATION REPORT FOR THE LA CANADA DRIVE EXTENSION FROM TANGERINE ROAD TO MOORE ROAD 8/18/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 4 In answer to a question from Council Member Bryant, Town Engineer Bill Jansen explained that the developers working in the Rancho Vistoso area are paying for improvements to Moore Road in bringing the road to the west. The La Canada Drive extension is part of the Metropolitan Transportation Plan and the PAG Regional Transportation Plan with monies earmarked for the extension. MOTION: Vice Mayor Johnson MOVED to APPROVE Resolution (R)99-84 accepting the Final Location Report, La Canada Drive Extension, and approving the recommended B-2 alignment as described in the report. Council Member Parisi SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 —0. Town Manager Chuck Sweet stated that the Town Attorney has a matter that is necessary to bring forth to Council. Town Attorney Dan Dudley stated that on August 4, 1999 the Council denied a motion to amend the Oro Valley Retail Center Sign Package amendment for Payless ShoeSource. Following the denial a lawsuit has been filed by Payless ShoeSource. As a result of the filing of the lawsuit, he and staff would like an opportunity to review the lawsuit thoroughly and report back to Council. He requested that Council reconsider the August 4' 1999 motion to deny, and upon that reconsideration, move to continue the item to the second meeting in September. Council Member LaSala stated that he did not think it was the intent of Council to reconsider their objections. He asked if this would help to put the Town in a better position for the lawsuit. In answer, Mr. Dudley explained that the reconsideration would give staff time to review the lawsuit and if possible, put the Town in a better position. MOTION: Council Member LaSala MOVED to RECONSIDER the motion to deny the Oro Valley Retail Center Sign Package Amendment, OV 13-98-33 adopted at the Council meeting of August 4, 1999. Vice Mayor Johnson SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 —O. MOTION: Council Member Bryant MOVED to CONTINUE OV 13-98-33 Oro Valley Retail Center Sign Package Amendment to the second meeting in September to permit adequate public notice. Vice Mayor Johnson SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 —0. 2. LEGISLATIVE REPORT—SAM POLITO Mr. Sam Polito reported on issues of major interest to the Town from the 1999 Legislative Session. Items he discussed were state shared revenues, incorporation issues and preemption issues 3. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY SPONSORSHIP OF THE CHAMBER'S GREAT PUMPKIN FAT TIRE BIKE RACE AND FESTIVAL Economic Development Administrator Jeff Weir reported that the Chamber of Northern Pima County has requested $3000 in sponsorship for the Great Pumpkin Fat Tire Bike 8/18/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 5 Race and Festival. Mr. Weir explained that the event would be larger this year than it has been in the past. He stated that in conjunction with Oro Valley's 25th Anniversary Celebration, the Town would be providing water bottles and advertising for the event. Mr. Weir stated that staff recommends increasing the Town's previous sponsorship amount of$1,000. Melanie Larson, President of the Chamber, reviewed the plans for the event. She explained that the event has been enhanced this year and will include a festival. The event will be held at Catalina State Park and will also include bicycle safety demonstrations and a bike rodeo. In answer to questions from Council Member LaSala, Mike Cadden, Event Chairman, explained that direct expenses for the event would be approximately $10,000. Ms. Larson stated that Northwest Hospital would be donating $5,000,Norwest Bank-$1,000 and Mr. Tom Vetrano donating $250, with thousands of dollars of advertising also being donated. She further stated that the event is a major fundraiser for the Chamber and there would be direct benefits to the Town. In answer to a question from Council Member LaSala, Finance Director David Andrews reported that $5,200 was budgeted in the Economic Development Budget for Community Support requests. Mr. Weir stated that this was a significant event for the Town and he felt it was important to support the Chamber. He recommended a possible match from Council Contingency funds. Council Member Parisi urged Council to support the event and the Chamber. He stated that this event would be a bonus to the Town and was an important event to the community. Council Member Bryant stated that he was more comfortable with donating $2,000 just in case something else came up in the future that might also require funding. Council Member Parisi supported funds coming out of Council's contingency as this event was of great benefit to the Town. MOTION: Vice Mayor Johnson MOVED to APPROVE $3,000 in sponsorship of the Great Pumpkin Fat Tire Bike Race and Festival. Council Member Parisi SECONDED the motion. AMENDMENT TO THE MOTION: Council Member LaSala asked to amend the motion to include that$1,500 be taken from Council Contingency and $1,500 from the Economic Development Budget. Vice Mayor Johnson and Council Member Parisi agreed to the amendment. Motion carried, 5 —0. Mayor Loomis recessed the meeting at 8:25 p.m. The meeting resumed at 8:37 p.m. 8/18/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 6 Mayor Loomis moved Agenda Item#6 forward on the agenda. 6. PUBLIC HEARING-ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-22 OV8-99-2 COPPER MOUNTAIN ASSEMBLY OF GOD REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ESTABLISH A COMMUNITY SERVICE AGENCY FOR SPRINGBOARD, A TEMPORARY SHELTER FOR ABUSED, ADOLESCENT WOMEN, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF TANGERINE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY ' MILE WEST OF LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD (CONTINUED FROM MAY 5, 1999) Community Development Director Brent Sinclair reviewed the staff report stating that the Copper Mountain Assembly of God is requesting a Conditional Use Permit(CUP) for the Springboard shelter. He explained that there has been extensive public input on the project with dialog between Springboard, neighbors, staff and Council representatives. Mr. Sinclair explained that the translational zoning from Pima County zoning provided for requests for conditional uses. He explained that the surrounding area is R1-144, low density residential with the Church of the Apostles Church site immediately to the east. He further stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission has recommended approval of the CUP request. Mr. Sinclair reviewed the recommended conditions for the CUP. In answer to a question from Council Member LaSala regarding the Endangered Species Act, Town Attorney Dan Dudley stated that the ultimate responsibility would be the landowners. The Town's responsibility is to make sure that its ordinances are consistent with federal law. At the request of Town Manager Chuck Sweet, Planning and Zoning Director Bryant Nodine explained that the Town's policy provides that before any permit is issued, the applicant must indicate and sign that they understand and are aware of Federal Fish and Wildlife requirements in terms of Pygmy Owl surveys. He further explained that the Town is looking at revising the procedure to place the emphasis on the development plan and grading stage and not the use phase. Mr. Nodine reported that the church site has a completed survey and that the report is still valid. In response to a concern expressed by Council Member LaSala, Mr. Dudley explained that as long as the Council's actions are consistent with Pima County's actions during the translational process, then he would be comfortable. Reverend Seale, Copper Mountain Assembly of God, thanked Council, staff, and neighbors for their help on the project. He further stated that they were comfortable with the resolution and conditions as presented. Brian Hagedon, Senior Architect on the project, reviewed the proposed master plan for the Copper Mountain Assembly of God and Springboard project. Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. 8/18/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 7 The following spoke in support of the Springboard CUP: Dr. Tom Hendrickson, 1751 E. Buckridge Place Mark Stone, 4274 N. Howe Place Kathy Thomas, 1480 E. Grimalda Place Jackie Thomas, 11760 N. Rainrock Way Dr. Eric Abrams, 13835 N. Como Drive Darlene Abrams, 13835 N. Como Drive Marilyn Balcerzak, 10805 N. Ridgewind Court Reverend Snow Peabody, 698 E. Wetmore Road Pat Fairchild, 297 E. Southern Pines Drive Mike Gurr, 12471 N. Granville Canyon Way The following spoke in opposition of the Springboard CUP: Jon Michael, 2555 W. Tortolita Hills Trail The following spoke in favor of the concept but expressed their concerns about the property not being in Oro Valley and actions towards Tortolita: Alan Lathrem, 1750 W. Tangerine Road Barbara Smith, 13 600 N. Como Drive Steven Shocat, 1795 W. Hunter Road Paula Abbott, 12700 Bandanna Way, stated that she understands the concerns of all involved and she was trying to remain neutral. She stated that she hoped that everyone could work together. Claire Klingler, 12151 N. Como Drive stated that she and the neighbors did not have a problem with Springboard and their cause but they had a problem with the location. Ms. Klingler reviewed conditions she would like to see placed on Springboard to help mitigate their presence in the Town and asked that Council approve the conditions presented by Vice Mayor Johnson. Mayor Loomis closed the public hearing. Vice Mayor Johnson stated that Springboard and Teen Challenge are outstanding examples of what the private sector can do to help rehabilitate youth and adults and he supports their work completely. He stated that he supported their presence in Oro Valley, but he wanted to come to a compromise, an agreement, with the neighbors and the developers so that there would be a"win-win" situation for all parties. Vice Mayor Johnson reviewed suggested conditions that he would like placed and/or changed on the plan. He stated that some of these could be accomplished through the development plan process and would make the project more accommodating to the neighborhood. Vice Mayor Johnson also recommended that a committee of citizens be formed to work with Springboard. The committee would help enhance the working 8/18/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 8 relationship of the citizens of Oro Valley and Springboard by taking positive approaches to help with the mission and work of Springboard. Council Member LaSala stated that he would like to see the facility built as planned but he expressed his concerns regarding the fact that the courts have not made a final decision regarding the land and what `town" it lies in. In answer to questions from Council Member LaSala, Town Attorney Dan Dudley stated that there has been no ruling that Tortolita is a town, and that there has been no ruling that Tortolita is not a town. He also answered that there has been no ruling that Oro Valley's annexations are illegal. Council Member LaSala stated that he would like to see this approved based on an effective date that the property is ruled to be in Oro Valley. Council Member Parisi stated that he understands the neighbors concerns and he understands the feelings of the leaders of Tortolita. He stated that the town could work with the neighbors, the development standards, etc. Council Member Parisi further stated that as elected officials of Oro Valley, the Council must make decisions based on what is right today. Council Member Bryant stated that this is not Oro Valley's decision to make at this time due to the current litigation on the property. MOTION: Vice Mayor Johnson MOVED to APPROVE Ordinance No. (0)99-22, OV8-99-2, Copper Mountain Assembly of God Community Service Agency Conditional Use Permit with the conditions listed in Exhibit"A", with changing condition#2 to eight (8) residents and by changing the Town Review Committee to include two (2) neighbor representatives, a Town Council Member, the Town Manager, the Chief of Police, the Community Development Director, a Springboard representative and a Church representative. A) 1. All structures to be constructed for the operation of the Springboard residence shall comply with the R1-144 regulations for accessory buildings. 2. *The total number of beds for the Springboard Home shall be phased. No more than eight (8) beds shall be utilized during the first two years. Upon successful completion of the second annual review, the total number of beds may be expanded to a maximum of twenty (20). 3. No person with a criminal record or criminal charges pending, shall be admitted to, or reside at, this facility. Status offenses are exempt. 4. There shall be a minimum of two supervisory staff on site at all times. 5. The abutting property owners shall be notified by the applicant of the development plan review process. 6. All alarms on-site shall not be audible to adjoining property owners. 7. Buffer yards shall emphasize `non-pedestrian friendly' vegetation, such as cacti. 8. *The Conditional Use Permit (CUP) shall be reviewed annually, in concurrence with the Department of Economic Security (DES) review, by a committee consisting of 2 8/18/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 9 neighbor representatives, a Town Council Member, the Town Manager, the Chief of Police,the Community Development Director, a Springboard representative and a Church representative (Committee would meet six months after the Certificate of Occupancy and then semi-annually for two years and the Committee would have the authority to change the frequency as they determine.) Should the reviewing body determine that the CUP should be revoked, they shall submit a recommendation of termination to the Town Council for their action. Violation of any of the above conditions or incidents having impact on the neighboring properties shall be grounds for termination of the CUP for this facility. ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS PROVIDED BY VICE MAYOR JOHNSON: 1) Springboard Facility to be located as far southwest as feasible. 2) Move driveway off Tangerine farther to the west. 3) Parking to be relocated to southern portion and make buffer to the north. 4) Springboard should be residential in design/appearance. 5) Provide screening around yard (wall or landscaping around back of facility) 6) *Change to 8 residents for first two years. 7) *Form Town Review Committee to consist of 2 neighbor representatives, a Town Council Member, the Town Manager,the Chief of Police, the Community Development Director, a Springboard representative and a Church representative (Committee would meet six months after the Certificate of Occupancy and then semi- annually for two years and the Committee would have the authority to change the frequency as they determine.) 8) Restrict land use to 30% of property 9) Use will be restricted to females ages 8-18 10) Landscape architect to work with the Klinglers' on the placement of the visible screening buffers such as the trees and cacti, etc. Council Member LaSala SECONDED the motion. DISCUSSION: Council Member LaSala asked to amend the motion by adding that it be effective on the date that the courts rule that this property is in Oro Valley. Vice Mayor Johnson did not accept the amendment. CALL FOR THE QUESTION: Motion carried, 3 —2, with Council Member LaSala and Council Member Bryant opposed. Mayor Loomis recessed the meeting at 10:00 p.m. The meeting resumed at 10:12 p.m. 4. RESOLUTION NO. (R)99-85 AWARD OF BID FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF ORO VALLEY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUILDING AND AUTHORIZING THE TOWN TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT Community Development Director Brent Sinclair reported that bids for construction of the Development Services Building were received and opened on August 10, 1999. Giles 8/18/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 10 Construction was the apparent low bidder but they have officially requested that they be removed from consideration due to mathematical errors. Mr. Sinclair explained that the next low bidder would be Richard E. Lambert, Ltd. at $1,159,500. References have been checked and the company is qualified to do the project. He explained that staff recommends the approval of the award of bid to Richard E. Lambert, Ltd. MOTION: Council Member LaSala MOVED to APPROVE the award of bid to Richard E. Lambert Ltd., the lowest responsible bidder, for a total project cost of$1,159,500 and to approve Resolution No. (R)99-85 authorizing and directing staff to enter into a contract with Richard E. Lambert, Ltd. Vice Mayor Johnson SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 —0. 5. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-46 REVISION TO SECTION 109.1, USE AND OCCUPANCY, OF THE 1994 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE Community Development Director Brent Sinclair reported that staff is recommending a revision to Section 109.1, Use and Occupancy of the 1994 Uniform Building Code to allow for a Certificate of Occupancy to be issued for single family residences, private garages and carports. He explained that this change would allow the inspectors to insure that all improvements (i.e. structural, site, and infrastructure) have been completed. In answer to a question from Council Member LaSala, Mr. Sinclair stated that in some cases there could be some delay in issuing the Certificate of Occupancy but the end result would provide protection to buyers. Council Member Parisi stated that owners should have a certain amount of liberty in their own homes and he suggested that some discretion should be used. In answer to a question from Vice Mayor Johnson, Mr. Sinclair stated that the suggested revision is at the discretion of the individual cities and towns. He explained that he thought that the majority of towns have implemented some type of similar mechanism. Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. Jim Kreigh, 40 E. Calle Concordia, stated that homeowners should not be allowed to move in if the home is not safe. He stated that the Town for some reason has been holding up Certificates of Occupancy based on site improvements and that the Uniform Building Code does not address site improvements. He stated that something like this should be done, but homeowners should be protected if they are not responsible (for items such as streets not per standard, drainage problems caused by other scenarios, etc.) Mayor Loomis closed the public hearing. MOTION: Council Member Bryant MOVED to CONTINUE Ordinance (0)99-46 to the second Council meeting of September to allow more time to study the issues. Council Member Parisi SECONDED the motion. 8/18/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 11 DISCUSSION: Vice Mayor Johnson asked that staff look at safety issues, cosmetic fixes, etc. Motion carried, 5 —0 7. RESOLUTION NO. (R)99-86 APPROVAL OF MODIFICATIONS TO THE PROPOSED INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH PIMA COUNTY REGARDING THE UTILIZATION OF COUNTY BOND PROCEEDS TO DEVELOP THE ORO VALLEY PUBLIC LIBRARY Community Development Director Brent Sinclair reported that the Pima County Board of Supervisors has approved the Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with some revisions. He explained that he has not received the final agreement for Council's final approval and suggested that Council might want to continue the item until the final copy of the IGA is received. Vice Mayor Johnson stated that he would not support approval of the IGA without seeing the document. He asked that staff begin the process for the selection of the architect for the library. MOTION: Vice Mayor Johnson MOVED to CONTINUE Resolution No. (R)99-86 until the September 1, 1999 Council meeting and direct staff to proceed with the architectural Request for Proposal (RFP). Council Member Bryant SECONDED the motion. Motion carried 5 —0. 8. COMPENSATION STUDY FOR MAYOR AND COUNCIL Mayor Loomis and Council Member LaSala excused themselves from discussion of Item #8 declaring a conflict of interest. Vice Mayor Johnson chaired this portion of the meeting. In answer to a concern from Council Member Bryant,Nancy Mager, Chair of the Compensation Study Task Force, stated that the recommendation for the compensation was determined by comparing statistical data and reviewing the time and work put forth by the Mayor and Council. Council Member Bryant stated that he was more interested in volunteering his time to the town. He also thanked the Task Force for their work on the study. Council Member Parisi stated that his term is running out, but he felt that the next council deserves the compensation that has been agreed upon by the community. MOTION: Council Member Parisi MOVED to ACCEPT the Mayor and Council Compensation Task Force recommendation as presented, and to instruct staff to develop the appropriate ordinance for Council action at the next available council meeting. Vice Mayor Johnson SECONDED the motion. 8/18/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 12 DISCUSSION: Council Member Bryant stated that he felt it was hard to vote to pay oneself and that he served on the Council as a"labor of love" and not for monetary reasons. Vice Mayor Johnson stated that people expect a high quality job from politicians and he felt that compensation would help draw more qualified candidates. He stated that there were many tough decisions before the Town and he would support the recommendation for compensation. Motion carried, 2— 1 with Council Member Bryant opposed. 9. ANNUAL ANALYSIS OF ZONING CONFORMANCE WITH THE GENERAL PLAN Planning and Zoning Director Bryant Nodine reported that during the analysis of zoning conformance, a number of parcels were identified to be in non-conformance with the General Plan. Mr. Nodine reviewed the Action Plan for the non-conforming parcels. He stated that staff recommends that Council approve the ranked action plan and that Council direct staff to begin working with the property owners of parcels 7636 and 7861 (the two highest ranked non-conformance parcels) to develop performance standards that will implement the action plan. MOTION: Council Member LaSala MOVED to APPROVE the ranked action plan, and direct staff to work with the property owners of parcels 7636 and 7861 to develop performance standards in conformance with the action plan. These performance standards will be returned to the Commission and Council for review and approval by November. Vice Mayor Johnson SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 —0. 10. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION,AUTHORIZING INTERVENTION IN CITY OF TUCSON V GRANT WOODS ET AL, [COMMITTEE TO INCORPORATE, INC. AND COMMITTEE TO INCORPORATE THE TOWN OF TORTOLITA, DEFENDANT-INTERVENORS] (PIMA COUNTY CAUSE NO. 32-0926) Town Attorney Dan Dudley recommended that Council intervene on the side of the City of Tucson in the case of City of Tucson V Grant Woods Et Al. He stated that this would help bring about some finality to the issues that separate Tortolita and Oro Valley. Mr. Dudley further stated that he felt this would bring about a more prompt resolution than if Oro Valley waited until the City of Tucson case was determined and then pursue its own case with Tortolita. In answer to questions from Council Member LaSala, Mr. Dudley stated that the primary argument in the case is whether the 1961 law was constitutional. The 1961 Law provided that a"new"town needed approval for incorporation from towns within a specified distance. He further explained that if the 1961 law is determined to be constitutional, then Oro Valley has an interest as to whether Tortolita was validly incorporated and now needs to be dis-incorporated or whether Tortolita never even existed. The reason for concern is that Tortolita feels that they are incorporated and that Oro Valley's zoning 8/18/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 13 actions are illegal. Mr. Dudley stated that if Tortolita is determined to be "void" from the beginning, then Oro Valley's actions are clearly legal and appropriate. In answer to a question from Council Member Bryant, Mr. Dudley explained that if in the future the City of Tucson withdrew from the pending lawsuit, Oro Valley would be responsible for attorney fees for litigation. If they were successful on the Voting Rights Act, Oro Valley could possibly be responsible for fees incurred by Tortolita's attorney from the time of Oro Valley's involvement forward. Mayor Loomis opened the floor for public comment. John Michael, 2555 W. Tortolita Hills Trail, stated they have the right to due process. He stated that this is not a game, it is a civil rights case. They (Tortolita) have the right to vote on self-determination. Alan Lathrem, 1750 W. Tangerine Road, stated that if Oro Valley enters into the City of Tucson case, it would be one more example of"adding salt to the wound." He asked Council to look at where Oro Valley was twenty-five years ago when it tried to incorporate and what they were attempting to do now to Tortolita. Steven Shocat, 1795 W. Hunter Road, stated that most of the Oro Valley Council Members have stated that they support Tortolita's right to exist and its right to self- determination. He stated that it was ironic that the founding fathers of Oro Valley fought the City of Tucson to incorporate and now Council is considering siding with Tucson. Barbara Smith, 13 600 N. Como Drive, reminded Council that the City of Tucson was Oro Valley's "bully." She said that maybe Oro Valley should not follow in their foot steps and maybe Oro Valley should not join them in being the bully to Tortolita. Jim Kriegh, 40 E. Calle Concordia, stated that as one of the founding fathers of Oro Valley, he was against the Council interfering with Tortolita. He stated that siding with the City of Tucson, who fought against Oro Valley's incorporation, was giving the wrong impression. Paula Abbott, 12700 Bandanna Way, asked that Council not be hypocrites and to show the people how they feel. She stated that Oro Valley would not be a town if it were not for people like Jim Kriegh. She stated that we need to respect Tortolita's right to be a town. Council Member LaSala stated that he does not consider sitting on Council as a"game." He said that Council has a phenomenal responsibility and as a Council Member he feels very strongly about his responsibility to the Town. He also stated that Oro Valley fought a hard fight and siding with the City of Tucson is not right. He stated that this is not an endorsement of the Town of Tortolita, but he could not support intervention. Council Member Bryant stated that perception is everything. He stated that he understands the reasons to expedite the case but he could not support the intervention. 8/18/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 14 Council Member Parisi stated that he does support Tortolita and Casas Adobes in becoming towns but as an elected official, he has the duty to vote on what is right for Oro Valley. He stated that he would like to get the issue resolved in court as quickly as possibly. MOTION: Council Member Parisi MOVED to JOIN the City of Tucson in this particular lawsuit. Vice Mayor Johnson SECONDED the motion. DISCUSSION: Vice Mayor Johnson stated that he has had his doubts about the validity of some of the actions that have been taken. He understands that Tortolita wants to keep their lifestyle, but he felt land uses could have been protected without Tortolita becoming a town. He stated that it is imperative that the decision be made as quickly as possible and with a degree of certainty. Mayor Loomis stated that by joining the City of Tucson, it would expedite and resolve the process with respect to the issues. His main concern is that we will be able to ask the Judge for a judgement that will address the issues and put closure to these items. Motion carried, 3 —2, with Council Member Bryant opposed and Council Member LaSala abstaining. 11. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE AUTHORIZATION TO ENTER INTO SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WITH PULTE HOMES REGARDING CONSTRUCTION OF A MEDIAN CUT ON RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD IN,AT OR NEAR NEIGHBORHOOD 5, PARCEL T, IN RANCHO VISTOSO MOTION: Vice Mayor Johnson MOVED to AUTHORIZE the Town Attorney to negotiate and enter into a settlement with Pulte Homes regarding the Rancho Vistoso median cut at the level recommended in the Executive Session. Council Member LaSala SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 —0. TOWN MANAGER'S REPORT No report. ENGINEER'S REPORT No report. FINANCE DIRECTOR'S REPORT No report. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S REPORT Community Development Director Brent Sinclair reported that the Arizona Department of Transportation has awarded the Town an additional grant that would help provide a 8/18/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 15 new passenger van for Coyote Run Transportation Services. He reported that this is the third year that Oro Valley has received the grant. POLICE CHIEF'S REPORT No report. WATER UTILITY DIRECTOR'S REPORT No report. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS Vice Mayor Johnson reported that the Greater Tucson Economic Council (GTEC) received $364,000 from Pima County. Council Member LaSala reported that seven people were interviewed for the Budget and Bond Oversight Committee and they hope to recommend five people to Council at the next meeting. Council Member Bryant reported that the Water Utility Commission is working very hard on alternative water resources. They hope to bring their recommendations to Council in the near future. Mayor Loomis reported that the League of Arizona Cities and Towns Resolutions Committee has met and there seems to be good support for the Save-a-Plant resolution as presented by Oro Valley. He stated that funding sources must be identified for all of the proposed resolutions. Council Member Bryant thanked Mr. Bill Adler for his generous monetary contribution to the Save-a-Plant Program. CALL TO AUDIENCE Aspen Green, 1795 W. Hunter Road, stated that Council does not seem to understand the frustration of the citizens of Tortolita. She said that Council should listen to Jim Kreigh, the founder of Oro Valley. Paula Abbott, 12700 Bandanna Way, stated that she supports the compensation plan for Mayor and Council. She stated that she felt this would open the door and encourage future potential candidates to run for Council. Ms. Abbott also stated that the compensation will remind those who sit on the Council who they represent. She stated that many citizens appreciate the dedication and time put forth by the Council. 8/18/99 Minutes, Council Regular Session 16 ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Vice Mayor Johnson MOVED to adjourn at 11:45 p.m. Council Member Bryant SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 —0. Respectfully submitted, .c .J\.;', --- Roxana Garrity, Deputy Town Clerk I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the regular session of the Town of Oro Valley Council of Oro Valley, Arizona held on the 18th day of August 1999. I further certify that the meeting was duly called and held and that a quorum was present. Dated this day of , 1999. Kathryn E. Cuvelier,CMC Town Clerk if I 0 • 11000 N. La Canada Dr. 11, Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 'ERNER S. WOLFF, Chief of Police {, ► Phone (520) 742-5474 FAX (520) 797-2616 •dik'>. ► 1 UNDEp1 ORO VALLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT "INTEGRITY, PRIDE, EXCELLENCE" MMQR&NPUM TO: Mayor Loomis and Town Council FROM: Chief Werner S. Wolff DATE: August 10, 1999 RE: Monthly Breakdown of Citations by Violation and Police Activity Summary Attached please find the updates for the month of July, 1999. WSW:nir N M r-. 'o C\ VO M 00 rt V) Q\ d' N C ,", n OM p r-• ,--.. O N O N cl, CP `J 4- t. `O N M •-- c'c H O H U w O z H C.) C Elm* 4 a w W „, c4 , -.i (...cg .., iiit . , Ai M O C" r�-� N C N N 00 M C, 00 � 00 t� ON O Cr W N N C — — N N c q to \C O M M C` AVD PTI4 OOO O NM N N .-4 N M v, NcV - N ON N M C O M O N enc.) CT N C O Cr) ql' qlt CC 0.4 CM� C O O 01 M VD ON 00 M N 00 N N 00 N k' AOM *--- to r-+ N N ON N M VO N O M cr; LI) C d" VC \O ON �' ,,zr N C 440 ,--. --- N kr) O t� W14 N O - ON N N O ,N N 00 d' 00 ‹) 0C C N v) VD 00 M d' cr 0-4 C.) 0.-0 4' .4 , , . , , . O -. C1 `1- N M O d' � �' M r-+ M M � M N VO � � Cr)M N 'd' N � N Q� Cr) � en kr)00 N � � �t C Cr C C , • C\ N O - t� t� - in C\ d' 01 t� ,--. Cy Cl- C,) N r.. d' N00 r-+ N N ON O N M Cr 00 r--� .1' M N N -1' n ►-� w O a4 H C in ,n N N — ,-- �C •--. C\ t•-• �C M 00 �C .:1- C`' a'" -- -+ V•) M N N N Nin 00 - ct 00 OC a4 CD �. 1 rN k1--- N O w CA w w H ril x 0 C7N _ c„ _ 4.1 op c'-'' 2 "52 'a' cA to 6 c-,) 'f) cl. 9 ,..) 0.,,,,n 5 1 8 .< .8 ? I 2 c H = H H Q < H ►�' 44 w �✓ p4 a P4 C Z ,--+ ,--. M1---- O qD .1. O CT ,--4 r-" CD N r-11 . - N CT eN1 tel kr) GNG CT N c ,--- M N0 ,:t, H O H L) W Q O Z 4 c _____ ___. , , . ,•.• .-1 Hc..)itt O 0.4 , , .0 ..,1 1-04 p. W ci, w co _ _ , , ,� i-i ck 4• 4 c...o W imi 00 4 �!' O O CT O t� 00 M — 00 O N A O W O J --c..) o am 6T.0 M N O \O M 00 04 r- t--- —. N O � N v) N r-- M NO O 0 O0 N a• 4 ;.4 ,.4 , ›,4 CT N O H M O M O CT CT V) M M M .. 00 ,-. M — M W � N a 0 w5 ....._ ....._, ...t -, v) v) N O t- M C [- O O - C • w O g , . g CO N O CN N O O O 00 00 —. N 00 C O r.... N, 01114 : — ,.....— , ,—, ,--. kr) O .--+ O c'7 VO N,... r.. in ,—. CT M N C 4 (4[..0 ,,,-, .,-, 0 , � M O ,--, t-- O N O vO -7t- 00 M M N Z00 00 r--+ r--+ N ,-. M \D 4 Q C. O H CNW O ZCT W a CT U Q 4 H ,o cii� W r-) Q W HcinC t O• � 0 c%) (.. 0 g O � W 40,1 W > i H �' ›., W �., Q O E-4 gw = W U w Z = L) H w0 Q Q w Ccn N D Co r-• c O M O N G'C. (I) CT d- `p N N G' 64 O 6R O N W • O OD in t� O N N L • CG b N 44 C, —y N ..... < 4� 64 69 6A 64 64 6A .—. 69 Q ›- VD 000 O Okr, \pvoN O .72' O \O N U L a) Ll. ,-1• oo CT O -- C O O O O -- • .7t 'D CT N 6A 6A 44 t kr) t� • rt 00 N EA CT CT C — Q cu cn > r-- 6A oo 6A o0 6A 6A 64 44 69 LT.1 cu ii• C!p t� '7t — M kr, O O O M M 00 • •E 00 7r' ._r U E a, a- . cn • 'C CT C N 64 44 64 N • O = 00 N L Cr, C� C H Q y ri N o0 in- in v� •— Z > N 64 44 00 44 44 C, Z O 69 64 64 C 2 � cn N r1 O O O M M 00 ... 00 > W z Co L a, E— v� M O N `C t� C1 M O ON L a) M --y M ,7t. 'C ,r) O N C, 9 . t^ d^ C M ,O N 'O N • OT _ N `D M -- 00 U1 N' 00 64 N v V = 0 > 44 64 64 64 64 �'" N 'D — ,:r' M N M N 00 G.. • 00 C\ N O N G4 "� CA N 'C CT O t� C, O M O N C, a� G1 �O N N C, 64 O 69 O N Q = O ,D v1 N O N N in > = v1 LO O 6A M M '1- N o a)6A 6A 64 6A 6A 64 — N 64 Z 00 00 N M O 00 O M O O G' M O ; r7N 6 N 69 O it- p N00 N M N O 00 • M00 00 zs 00O O d' N 00 O 00 'D z O 4 T 00 'C W N M N -- 00 • > •-- 64 64 64 64 •-- 6r4 6A 6A U O O O VD 'C N O •1- O VO N cn 00 — to .-., a) a ea O 4.+ a a ."- cn a = �y a ce U U N su . Z 4) c4 o w `� Z V U w `� :u .� CI -U > 2 Q >, �, >,..., �, 0 3 .... L o F-. = a, ,� u a ; en aO a, co ►-a U . Rs g < zz ani gcUa �_ .-°� ani H 3w ; o.' �_ � �' v� C� v� Q 45 < CD � O cx QEZ. C7 D TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: September 1, 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: David L. Andrews, Finance Director SUBJECT: Finance Report For Month Ended July 1999 SUMMARY: Attached to this communication is the Finance Report for the Month Ended July 31, 1999. Financial statements were prepared using pre-audit figures. GENERAL FUND: Select points are as follows: q:). Sales tax collections do not reflect a full month due to timing differences related to the fiscal year end close. \ q:). Residential building permit fees collected total $112K which indicates a favorable trend in construction related activity for the new fiscal year. State/county shared revenues collected total $181K. Federal and state grant collections were not reflected due to timing differences related to the billing of outside agencies. q> Departmental expenditures were under budget. Other Funds tb State shared fuels taxes were not reflected due to timing differences related to the fiscal year end close. q. Local transportation assistance funds were not reflected due to timing differences related to the fiscal year end close. t't> Townwide roadway impact fees, alternative water impact fees and water connection fees revenues are meeting or exceeding budget. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Co COUNCIL COMMUNICATION PAGE 2 OF 2 Oro Valley Water Utility tb Retained earnings is $1,057K. q> Water revenues are slightly below budget due to timing differences related to the fiscal year end close . t . Cash at July 1, 1999 is exceeding budget. 4 oR. . David L. Andrews Finance Director / 773 r 1 , -. .: 7 #71r 0; . ' a: r CC: Chuck Sweet, Town Manager All Department Heads Town of Oro Valley GENERAL FUND Budget Compared to Actuals Report Through July 31, 1999 Percentage of-Year Completed 1/12 =8.35 1999/2000 Percentage July Y-T-P Total of-Budget Actuals Actuals Budget Completed REVENUES Local Taxes $ 5,641 $ 5,641 $ 4,962,000 0.1% State/County Shared 181,496 181,496 4,503,000 4.0% Fines 14,529 14,529 201,000 7.2% Licenses & Permits 132,181 132,181 1,105,000 12.0% Charges for Services _ 30,790 30,790 220,600 14.0% Federal Grants - - 647,323 0.0% State Grants - - 281,993 0.0% interest Earnings 19 19 318,600 0.0% Miscellaneous 8,365 8,365 15,500 54.0% Bond Proceeds - - 2,700,000 0.0% Carryforward 7,531,724 TOTAL REVENUES 373,021 373,021 22,486,740 2.5% EXPENDI T URES: Town Council 11,423 11,423 81,983 13.9% Town Clerk 9,502 9,502 275,132 3.5% Mays-trate Court 17,396 _ 17,396 340,173 5.1% in Manager 11,092 11,092 243,401 4.6% Human Resources 5,691 5,691 180,327 3.2% Economic Development 9,397 9,397 313,249 3.0% Finance 11,417 11,417 334,793 3.4% Legal 10,773 10,773 459,809 2.3% Community Development Administration 6,805 6,805 288,440 2.4% Planning & Zoning 29,304 29,304 956,491 3.1% Parks & Recreation 37,299 37,299 849,292 4.4% Police 253,322 253,322 5,450,974 4.6% Police- Capital Contingency - - 132,493 0.0% Building Safety 20,620 20,620 934,772 2.2% Custodial & Facility MaintenanCe 5,477 5,477 146,752 3.7% General Administration: Personnel, Operations & Maintenance 29,830 29,830 381,674 7.8% Improvements - - 115,489 0.0% Vehicles & Equipment ui ment 160 160 24,500 0.7% Land - - 3,243,500 0.0% Transfers to Other Funds - - 1,901,810 0.0% Contingency/Reserve 5,831,686 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 469,508 $ 469,508 $ 22,486,740 2.8% REVENUES LESS EXPENDITURES $ (96,487) $ (96,487) (IND BA LA NCEAAT-JULY 1, 1999 $ 8,152,994 CURRENT FUND BALANCE $ 8,056,507 ' Pre-audit figure. Town ofOio Valley HIGHWAY FUND Budget Compared to Actuals Repoi-t Through July 31, 1999 Petcen tage ofYeat- Completed 1/12=8.35 1999/2000 Percentage July Y T-D Total of Buciget Actuals Actuals Budget Completed REVENUES: State Shared Fuels Tax $ - $ - $ 1,629,000 0.0% _ Other Revenues 972 972 70,800 1.4% Transfer from Debt Service Fund - - 73,860 0.0% Carryforward of Fund Balance 1,832,378 TOTAL REVENUES 972 972 3,606,038 1 0.1% EXPENDITURES: Personnel 31,143 31,143 634,725 4.9% Operations& Maintenance 29,776 29,776 551,134 5.4% p . Capital Improvements - - 1,030,000 0.0% Equipment& Vehicles - - 240,000 0.0% Lease Purchase Payments - - 55,982 0.0% Contingency 1,094,197 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 60,919 $ 60,919 $ 3,606,038 2.4% REVENUES LESS EXPENDITURES $ (59,947) $ (59,947) FUND BALANCE ATJULY 1, 1999 $ 1,960,836 * CURRENT FUND BALANCE $ 1,900,889 *Pre-audit figure. Town olOro Valley TOWNWIDE ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT-IMPACT-FEES FUND Budget CCmpred to Actuals Report Through July 31,1999 Percentage o1Yeer Completed 1/12 =8.35 1999/2000 Percentage July Y-T-P Total olBudget A ctuuls Actuals Budget Completed REVENUES: Interest-Investments $ - $ - $ 270,000 0.0% Development Impact Fees 164,714 164,714 1,307,000 12.6% Carryforward of Fund Balance - - 5,428,238 TOTAL REVENUES 164,714 164,714 7,005,238 2.4% EXPENDITURES: Personnel - - 62,812 0.0% Outside Professional Services - - 80,000 0.0% Improvements - - 2,138,000 0.0% tinqency - - 4,724,426 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ - $ - $ 7,005,238 0.0% REVENUES LESS EXPENDITURES $ 164,714 $ 164,714 FUND BA LA NCEA TJUL Y 1, 1999 $ 6,133,360 CURRENT FUND BALANCE $ 6,298,074 Town oFOro Valley PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION FUND Budget Compares/to Actuals Report Through Duly 31, 1.999 Perces t,c7ge of Yeas Completed 7/72 =8.39' 1999/2000 Percentage July Y-T-P Total ofBudget Actuals Actuals Budget Completed REVENUES: HB 2565 State Grant $ - $ - $ 11,000 0.0% Local Transportation Assistance Funds - - 156,000 0.0% Other 1,698 1,698 18,500 9.2% Carryforward of Fund Balance 74,153 TOTAL REVENUES 1,698 1,698 259,653 0.9% EXPENDITURES: Personnel 5,917 5,917 153,034 3.9% Operations & Maintenance 3,996 3,996 59,923 6.7% Capital Outlay - - 24,980 0.0% Contin enc 21,716 LTAL EXPENDITURES $ 9,913 $ 9,913 $ 259,653 4.2% REVENUES LESSEXPENDITURES $ (8,215) $ (8,215) FUND BALANCER TJUL Y 1, 1999 $ T04,249 * CURRENT-FUND BALANCE $ 96,034 Pre-audit figure. Town oFOro Valley COO Rl l/ERFRONT PARK FUND Budget Compared to Actuals Report Through July 31,1292 Percentage oFYe4r Completed 1/12 =8.39' 1999/2000 Percentage July y r-o Total of-Budget Actuals Actuals Budget i Completed REVENUES: Pima County Bond Proceeds _ $ - $ - $ 1,250,000 0.05 Transfer from General Fund - - 773,256 0.070 Carryforward o(Fund Balance - 388,876 0.0% TOTAL REVENUES - - 2,412,132 0.0% EXPENDITURES: Outside Professional Services - - 83,000 0.0% Improvements - - 2,329,132 0.05 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ - $ - $ 2,412,132 0.0% REVENUES LESS EXPENDITURES $ - . $ - FUND BALANCER TJULY 1, 1999 $ 374,253 CURRENT-FUND BALANCE $ 374,253 Pre-audit figure. Town ofOro Valley MUNICIPAL FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION F(/ND Budget Campared to Actuals Report Through July 31,1999 Percentage ofYear Completed 1/12=8.35 1999/2000 Percentage July r r-o rota/ ofaudget Actuals Actuals Budget Completed REVENUES: CarryForward oF Fund Balance - 1,435,944 0.05 TOTAL REVENUES - - 1,435,944 0.05 EXPENDITURES: Improvements - - 1,435,944 0.0% TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ - $ - $ 1,435,944 0.0% REVENUES LESS EXPENDITURES $ - $ - F `IP BALf1 NCEAril/1.Y 1, 1999 $ 1,372,870 CURRENT"RIND BALANCE $ 1,372,870 Pre-audit Fure. Town olOro Valley ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY Budgeted Income Statement Through July 31, 1999 Percentage ofYear Completed 1/12=8.35 1999/2000 Percentage July Y-T-P Total ofBudget Actuals Actuals Budget Completed OPERATING REVENUES• Water Revenues $ 379,453 $ 379,453 $ 5,228,000 7.3% Service Charges & Meter Income 15,823 15,823 209,000 7.6% TOTAL REVENUES 395,276 395,276 5,437,000 7.3% OPERATING EXPENSES: Personnel 36,497 36,497 892,339 4.1% Operations&Maintenance 77,535 77,535 1,695,891 4.6% Depreciation &Amortization 105,710 105,710 1,351,000 7.8% TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 219,742 219,742 3,939,230 5.6% OPERATING INCOME 175,534 175,534 1,497,770 11.7% NOPERATING REVENUES (EXPENSES) err Interest Income - - 190,000 0.0% Interest Expense 122,229 122,229 1,616,833 7.6% TOTAL NONOPERA TING REVENUES (EXPENSES) (122,229) (122,229) (1,426,833) NET INCOME $ 53,305 $ 53,305 $ 70,937 RETAINED EARNINGS AT)4 1, 1999 $ 1,003,714 $ 400,333 CURRENT RETAINED EARNINGS $ 1,057,019 $ 471,270 Pre-audit figure. Town oFOro Valley ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY Cash 8r Capital Budgets Through July 31, 1999 Budget Current at Over/ Ca to9 ory Balance 6/30/2000 (Under) Cash from Operations $ 3,245,463 $ '1,463,074 $ 1,782,389 1996 MPC Bond Proceeds 291,566 - 291,566 1999 MPC Bond Proceeds n 1,133,660 966,610 167,050 Debt Service Reserves 2,287,940 2,287,940 - Totals 6,958,629 4,717,624 2,241,005 July Y-T-0 1999/2000 7'Budget CAPITAL BUDGET Actuals Actuals Total Budget Completed 1 039 1,039 173,300 0.6% Machine & Equipment $ $ $ Machinery Vehicles - - 169,000 0.0% Meters 10,867 10,867 66,500 16.3% Wells - - 530,000 0.0% Booster Stations - - 212,500 0.0% Transmission/Distribution Main - - 490,800 0.0% Reservoirs - - 1,287,000 0.0% HO rants - - 7,500 0.0% Telemetry - - 130,250 0.0% Structures - - 100,600 0.0% TOTAL CAPITAL BUDGET $ 11,906 $ 11,906 $ 3,167,450 0.4% Town ofOro Valley ORO VALLEY WATER CONNECTION FEES FUND Budget Compared to Actuals Report Through July 31, 1999 Percentage of Year Completed 1/12 =8,55 1999/2000 Percentage July Y-T-D Total olBudget Actuals Actuals Budget Completed REVENUES: Connection Fees $ 63,468 $ 63,468 $ 775,000 8.2% Carryforward of Fund Balance 743,303 TOTAL REVENUES 63,468 63,468 1,518,303 8.2% EXPENDITURES: Improvements - - 1,324,000 0.0% Debt Service Payments - - 73,289 0.0% Contingency 121,014 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ - $ - $ 1,518,303 0.0% REVENUES LESS EXPENDITURES $ 63,468 $ 63,468 VP BA LA NCEA TTJUL Y 1, 1999 $ 429,433 CURRENT FUND BALANCE $ 492,901 * Pre-audit figure. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: September 1, 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk SUBJECT: Postponement of the September 15th Town Council Meeting SUMMARY: Due to the Annual League of Arizona Cities & Towns Conference scheduled in Oro Valley, September 7 — 10, it is necessary to postpone the September 15th regular meeting until September 22nd. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to postpone the regular meeting of September 15th to September 22nd due to the League of Arizona Cities & Towns Conference. VI1 1 / c , ' Town Manager TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: 09/01/99 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Froilan H. Cota, Interim Project Manager SUBJECT: Resolution No. (R) 99-8 7 A Resolution of the Town of Oro Valley, Pima County, Arizona Awarding a Contract Proposal to WestLand Resources, Inc., For a Preliminary Site Investigation and Land Acquisition for an F-Zone Reservoir and a Route Study for a 16" Supply Pipeline. BACKGROUND: Included in the water utility's budget for FY 99/2000 is a capital project for construction of a 1,000,000- gallon ,000,000- gallon reservoir to be located in the Northwest area of Oro Valley. The construction of this reservoir will allow the utility to provide water storage and dependable fire flow capability as well as ability to better meet peak summer demands in the F-Zone service area. WestLand Resources has submitted a proposal for professional engineering services to begin preliminary investigations for the new F-Zone reservoir and associated 16-inch supply pipeline to be constructed per the 1999/2000 CIP budget. Prior to the beginning of any design for these projects, several issues will need to be addressed. The consultant will study the issues related to the project, locate a site for the proposed reservoir, determine the routing for the proposed pipeline, and arrange for necessary property acquisition. The scope of work for services is as follows: On a preliminary basis, Water Plant (WP) No. 13 has been identified to be constructed with an F-Zone high water elevation of 3002 feet. The proposed reservoir site has been located in planning reports as adjacent to the proposed access road to the Ritz Carlton Resort location. Currently, the access road to the private resort has not yet been constructed and is in the planning stages. The investigation will include identification of sites that can be used for the F-Zone reservoir, provide preliminary site layouts, and piping designs for each alternative location. The consultant will identify the type of reservoir construction and will provide an opinion of probable construction costs necessary for the type of construction. Due to the fact that this reservoir may be very visible, it is proposed to investigate the aesthetic aspects of the construction of the proposed reservoir including screening, landscaping and fencing and to also coordinate with Rancho Vistoso Partners and their engineers to determine a location for the proposed reservoir and provide legal descriptions for site acquisition. In addition, the consultant proposes to provide a detailed summary of all of the current regulatory permitting and revegetation requirements for this project. Per existing planning information, the proposed 16-inch F-Zone main will connect into the suction side of WP No. 24 and will be constructed approximately 4,450 lineal feet (LF) northerly along the Rancho Vistoso right- of-way (R.O.W.). From existing planning information, approximately 1,500 LF of pipeline will need to be constructed through an area that is currently unsubdivided with no dedicated R.O.W. nor easements for construction at this time. The consultant proposes to determine the offsite routing for the proposed F-zone pipeline and coordinate with Rancho Vistoso Partners and their engineers for horizontal and vertical alignments. r---. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 2 The consultant also proposes to provide appropriate easement and ROW dedication information and opinions of probable construction costs for all of the proposed routes that are studied. WestLand Resources, Inc. (WestLand) is an engineering firm that has been associated with the Oro Valley Water Utility for the past two and one-half years; however, staff from WestLand have performed engineering and consulting services for the private utilities for the past ten and one-half years. The services provided by WestLand is classified as Professional Services, therefore, staff believes that Chapter 3, Section 4-8 of the Town Code and the Town's Standard Operating Procedure No. 2 may be implemented and a contract awarded to WestLand without going through the public bid process. FISCAL IMPACT: Staff included $900,000 in the FY99/00 budget specifically for construction of a 1,000,000-gallon reservoir, which included engineering costs. The contract proposal from WestLand is in the amount of$8,000.00. This amount in only for a preliminary site investigation for the reservoir and a route study for the 16-inch supply pipeline. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff respectfully recommends award of the contract proposal to WestLand Resources, Inc. in the amount of $8,000. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. (R)99- 87 A Resolution of the Town of Oro Valley, Pima County, Arizona Awarding a Contract Proposal to WestLand Resources, Inc. to provide preliminary engineering services for a 1,000,000 gallon reservoir at Water Plant No. 13 in the amount of$8,000.00. Or I move to ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. (R) 99- 87 2. Contract Proposal from WestLand Resources, Inc. in the amount of$8,000.00. ater Utility Dir 6/10 Town Manager Page 1 of 2 RESOLUTION NO. (R) 99-8 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING A CONTRACT WITH WESTLAND RESOURCES, INC. FOR PRELIMINARY SITE INVESTIGATION AND LAND ACQUISITION FOR AN F-ZONE RESERVOIR AND ROUTE STUDY FOR A 16"—SUPPLY PIPELINE WHEREAS, ORO VALLEY has the requisite statutory authority to acquire, own and maintain a water utility for the benefit of the landowners within and without the Town's corporate boundaries pursuant to the provision of Arizona Revised Statute 48-571 et.seq.; and WHEREAS, ORO VALLEY is a political subdivision of the State of Arizona, and pursuant to Article 13, Section 7 of the Arizona Constitution, is vested with all the rights, privileges and benefits and entitled to the immunities and exemptions granted municipalities and political subdivision under the Constitution and laws of the State of Arizona and the United States; and WHEREAS, the Oro Valley Water Utility needs to construct a 1,000,000 gallon reservoir in the Northwest service area to achieve a more dependable water supply system; and WHEREAS, the Oro Valley Water Utility has included in its budget for FY 99/00 a capital project for the construction of a 1,000,000 gallon reservoir to be located in the Northwest service area; and WHEREAS, WestLand Resources, Inc. has provided engineering and consulting services to the utility for the past ten and one-half years; and WHEREAS, ORO VALLEY now finds it necessary to award a contract to WestLand Resources, Inc. for professional services associated with preliminary site investigation and land acquisition for an F-Zone reservoir and route study for a 16" —supply pipeline; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE ORO VALLEY MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY; PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA: Page 2 of 2 1. That the attached Contract Proposal from WestLand Resources, Inc. for preliminary engineering services in the amount of$8,000.00 is hereby approved. 2. That the Mayor of the Town of Oro Valley and other administrative officials are hereby authorized to take such steps as are necessary to execute and implement said agreement. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Pima County, Arizona this_ 1st day of September , 1999. Mayor Paul H. Loomis ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Town Clerk Town Attorney 4203293°47 ary IN 4 WestLand Resources inc. 7 Engineering and Environmental Consultants 03 July 28, 1999abtra* 1:0 wss sq,%%4,0#1)ew Mr. David Hook, P.E. Water Utility Director TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 1565 E. Rancho Vistoso Boulevard, Suite A Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 RE: WATER PLANT NO. 13 F-ZONE RESERVOIR AND 16-INCH MAIN EXTENSION PRELIMINARY SITE INVESTIGATION,PIPE ROUTING,AND LAND ACQUISITION WESTLAND PROPOSAL NO. P442.99 Dear David: We are pleased to provide a proposal for professional engineering services to begin preliminary investigations for the new F-zone reservoir and associated 16-inch main extension to be constructed per the 1999/2000 CIP budget. It is our understanding that Water Plant (WP) No. 13 is scheduled to be built in the upcoming fiscal year. Prior to the beginning of any design for these projects, several issues will need to be addressed. We propose to study the issues related to the project, locate a site for the proposed reservoir, determine the routing for the proposed pipeline, and arrange for necessary property acquisition. Our scope of work for our services is as follows: WATER PLANT NO. 13 On a preliminary basis, WP No. 13 has been identified to be constructed with an F-zone high water of 3002. The proposed reservoir site has been located in planning reports as adjacent to the proposed access road to the Ritz Carlton Resort location. Currently, the access road to the private resort has not yet been constructed and is in the planning stages. Our investigation will include identification of sites that can be used for the F-zone reservoir, provide preliminary site layouts, and piping designs for each alternative location. We propose to identify the type of reservoir construction and will provide opinion of probable construction costs necessary for the type of construction. Due to the fact that this reservoir may be very visible, we propose to investigate the aesthetic aspects of the construction of the proposed reservoir including screening, landscaping, and fencing. We propose to also coordinate with Rancho Vistoso Partners and their engineers to determine a location for the proposed reservoir and will provide legal descriptions for site acquisition. In addition, we propose to provide a detailed summary of all of the current regulatory permitting and revegetation requirements for this project. 16-INCH F-ZONE MAIN EXTENSION Per existing planning information, the proposed 16-inch F-zone main will connect into the suction side of WP No. 24 and will be constructed approximately 4,450 lineal feet (If) northerly along the Rancho Vistoso right-of-way (ROW). From existing planning information, approximately 1,500 if of pipeline will need to be constructed through an area that is currently unsubdivided with no dedicated ROW or easements for construction at this time. We propose to determine the offsite routing for the proposed F- zone pipeline, coordinate with Rancho Vistoso Partners and their engineers for horizontal and vertical C.\MyFiles\Proposals\442 WP 13 f-zone reservoir doc 2343 E. Broadway Blvd., Suite 202 • Tucson, AZ 85719 • 520.206.9585 Fax 520.206.9518 Mr. David Hook, P.E. July 28, 1999 Page 2 alignments. We also propose to provide appropriate easement and ROW dedication information and opinions of probable construction costs for all of the proposed routes that are studied. We understand that it is very important that this project be constructed this fiscal year and are prepared to begin work immediately on the preliminary planning efforts to get the project moving forward. We propose to provide the above-referenced services on a time and materials basis per the attached rates with a budget of$8,000. If you have any questions regarding our scope of services or need additional information, please contact us. Respectfully, WestLand Resources, Inc. 7 / ' Mark F. Taylor,P.E. Principal TAM:jc cc: Thom Martinez,WestLand Froy Cota C:\MyFiles\Proposals\442 WP 13 f-zone reservoir.doc CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Project: Water Plant No. 13 F-Zone Reservoir and 16-inch Main Extention Preliminary Site Investigation,Pipe Routing,and Land Acquisition This Agreement entered into between WestLand Resources, Inc. (WestLand) and Town of Oro Valley (CLIENT) authorizes WestLand to complete the scope of services outlined in the Scope of Services described below. I. SCOPE OF SERVICES WestLand will provide a proposal for professional engineering services to begin preliminary investigations for the new F-zone reservoir and associated 16-inch main extension to be constructed per the 1999/2000 CIP budget. It is our understanding that Water Plant(WP)No. 13 is scheduled to be built in the upcoming fiscal year. Prior to the beginning of any design for these projects,several issues will need to be addressed. We propose to study the issues related to the project, locate a site for the proposed reservoir, determine the routing for the proposed pipeline, and arrange for necessary property acquisition. Our scope of work for our services is as follows: WATER PLANT NO. 13 On a preliminary basis, WP No. 13 has been identified to be constructed with an F-zone high water of 3002. The proposed reservoir site has been located in planning reports as adjacent to the proposed access road to the Ritz Carlton Resort location. Currently, the access road to the private resort has not yet been constructed and is in the planning stages. Our investigation will include identification of sites that can be used for the F-zone reservoir, provide preliminary site layouts,and piping designs for each alternative location. We propose to identify the type of reservoir construction and will provide opinion of probable construction costs necessary for the type of construction. Due to the fact that this reservoir may be very visible,we propose to investigate the aesthetic aspects of the construction of the proposed reservoir including screening,landscaping,and fencing. We propose to also coordinate with Rancho Vistoso Partners and their engineers to determine a location for the proposed reservoir and will provide legal descriptions for site acquisition. In addition,we propose to provide a detailed summary of all of the current regulatory permitting and revegetation requirements for this project. 16-INCH F-ZONE MAIN EXTENSION Per existing planning information,the proposed 16-inch F-zone main will connect into the suction side of WP No.24 and will be constructed approximately 4,450 lineal feet(10 northerly along the Rancho Vistoso right-of-way(ROW). From existing planning information,approximately 1,5001f of pipeline will need to be constructed through an area that is currently unsubdivided with no dedicated ROW or easements for construction at this time. We propose to determine the offsite routing for the proposed F-zone pipeline,coordinate with Rancho Vistoso Partners and their engineers for horizontal and vertical alignments. We also propose to provide appropriate easement and ROW dedication information and opinions of probable construction costs for all of the proposed routes that are studied. II. COSTS: We propose to provide the above-referenced services on a time and materials basis per the attached rates with a budget of$8,000. HI. TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1. CLIENT agrees to cooperate in any and every way or manner with WestLand on the services to be performed by WestLand as described above. 2. All sketches,drawings,tracings,computation,survey notes,and other original documents are and shall remain the property of WestLand, and CLIENT subject to the requirements of public agencies. 3. All agreements on WestLand's part are contingent upon and subject to the fact that WestLand shall not be responsible for damages or be in default or deemed to be in default by reason of delays in performance by reason of strikes,lockouts,accidents,acts of God,shortages of materials,unavailability of labor at established area wage rates,delays caused by failure of CLIENT or CLIENT's agents to furnish information or to approve or disapprove work promptly,or due to late or slow or faulty performance by CLIENT,or other contractors or governmental agencies,the performance of whose work is precedent to or concurrent with the performance of WestLand's services hereunder and other unavoidable delays or any causes beyond reasonable control of \\Admin-wp\c-drive\MyFiles\Proposals\442 WP 13 f-zone reservoir cont.doc Page 1 of 4 WestLand. In the case of the happening of any such cause of delay,the time of completion shall be extended accordingly. In the event WestLand's services hereunder are not completed within six(6)months from the date of this Agreement, WestLand reserves the right to adjust its fee for the uncompleted portion of its services to reflect any increases of wages,salaries or benefits to be paid by WestLand to its employees in the performance of this Agreement. WestLand shall complete the Scope of Services in accordance with Exhibit A. 4. In the event that any staking is destroyed by an act of God or parties other than WestLand,the cost of restaking shall be paid for by CLIENT. Such cost shall be in addition to the compensation otherwise payable to WestLand hereunder. 5. WestLand makes no representation concerning soil conditions, and has not,unless expressly set forth in the description of the scope of work set forth in this Agreement, undertaken any responsibility to furnish any reports or to secure performance of tests concerning the character of soils or their suitability for construction. In the event that WestLand agrees to secure performance of soil tests,it is agreed that the service shall be for the convenience of the CLIENT,and WestLand's only obligation shall be to coordinate the performance of soil tests and preparation of soil reports for a soil testing lab,which reports and tests shall be for exclusive use of and dissemination to CLIENT. WestLand shall not be responsible for any claims,liabilities or damages which arise or are alleged to arise out of the making or failure to make soil surveys, compaction tests or other subsurface soil tests of any kind or nature. 6. WestLand's responsibility in performing this contract is limited solely to the scope of services to be performed by WestLand as expressly set forth in this contract,and WestLand, its agents and/or employees shall have no liability of any kind to the CLIENT or to any construction contractor or subcontractor or any person having contractual relationships with them for any actions, errors and/or omissions of WestLand, its agents and/or employees which are not within the scope of the services to be performed by WestLand Additional services requested by the CLIENT shall be covered by letter or memorandum and constitute an addendum to the Agreement. 7. CLIENT agrees that the liability of WestLand,its agents and employees,in connection with services hereunder to the CLIENT and to all persons having contractual relationships with them,resulting from any negligent acts, errors and/or omissions of WestLand, it agents and/or employees is limited to the total fees actually paid by the CLIENT to WestLand for services rendered by WestLand hereunder. 8. No conditions or representation altering, detracting from or adding to the terms hereof shall be valid unless printed or written hereon or evidenced in writing by either party to this Agreement and accepted in writing by the other. 9. The CLIENT agrees that, in accordance with generally accepted construction practices, the construction contractor will be required to assume sole and complete responsibility for job site conditions during the course of construction of the project, including, without limitation, prosecution and of work and the safety of all persons and property and that this requirements shall be made to apply continuously and not be limited to normal working hours. CLIENT further agrees to defend, indemnify and hold WestLand harmless from any and all liability,real or alleged,in connection with the performance of work on the project. 10. CLIENT shall pay the cost of all expenses incurred or to be incurred by WestLand directly or indirectly in connection with the project for: transportation of subsistence incidental thereto: obtaining bids or proposals from contractors;toll telephone calls and telegrams; and all charges to be paid or incurred for fees,permits, bond premiums, title company charges, delivery charges, blueprints and reproduction of reports, drawings, specifications and all other charges and expenses not specifiable itemized in this paragraph, but which are reasonably necessary to the proper completion of the services hereby covered. In the event such reimbursable items are paid directly by WestLand,then CLIENT shall be obligated to reimburse WestLand,therefore, and such charges and expenses shall be invoiced by WestLand to CLIENT at direct cost,plus fifteen percent(15%) for handling. 11. Invoices will be issued monthly,are due and payable upon receipt and are delinquent thirty(30)days after the invoice date. When an invoice becomes delinquent,WestLand may,at its option suspend or stop performance hereunder until such time as all delinquent invoices, together with accrued late charges, attorneys' fees, litigation or collection expenses,whether taxable or not,shall have been paid. If an invoice remains delinquent for a period of thirty(30)days,WestLand may,at its option,terminate this Agreement by giving written notice \\Admin-wp\c-drive\MyFiles\Proposals\442 WP 13 f-zone reservoir cont.doc Page 2 of 4 of its termination to the CLIENT. Termination shall take effect on the date of the notice of termination. In the event of termination under the provisions of this paragraph,WestLand shall be entitled to payment for all services rendered and costs incurred hereunder to the date of termination and to recovery of all expenses which are attributable to said termination or described in paragraph 18 hereof. 12. CLIENT shall promptly review invoices and reasonably notify WestLand of any objection thereto. 13. If invoices are not paid in full prior to delinquency,CLIENT agrees to pay a late change on the unpaid amount at a monthly rate equivalent to the prime lending rate then being charged by Bank of Arizona,plus four(4) percentage points, said late charge to accrue from the date on which each such invoice becomes delinquent. WestLand reserves the right to increase or reduce the late charge rate by giving written notice to CLIENT. Notice of any such increase or reduction shall become effective thirty (30) days following the date of the notice. All payments received by WestLand shall first be credited to payment of any late charges and then to the principal balance. 14. In the event any term or provision of this agreement is held to be invalid or unenforceable,the validity of the other provisions hereof shall not be affected, and this agreement shall be construed and enforced as if it did not contain the particular term or provision held invalid or unenforceable. 15. In the event of a conflict or dispute as to the interpretation,application or implementation of this agreement, either party shall have the right to submit the conflict or dispute to arbitration in accordance with the Construction Industry Rules of the American Arbitration Association in effect at the time of submission of the dispute. 16. In the event of a change of rule,regulation or policy by any governmental agency or agencies after the date of this agreement,which change alters the plans,specifications and/or field work to be prepared or performed hereunder,any additional office or field work required as a result of such change shall be deemed additional services, shall be payable by CLIENT,and shall be invoiced and paid for as provided herein. 17. Upon written request,each of the parties hereto shall execute and deliver or cause to be executed and delivered such additional instruments and documents as may be necessary and proper to carry out the terms of this agreement. 18. Should litigation be necessary to enforce any term or provision of this agreement, then all litigation and collection expenses,including,without limitation,witness fees,court costs,attorneys'fees and other expenses, whether taxable or not,shall be paid to the prevailing party. 19. This agreement binds WestLand and CLIENT and their successors,assigns and partners. Neither party shall assign,sublet or transfer his interests,rights or obligations in this agreement without the prior written consent of the other party hereto. 20. This agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Arizona. Any action arising out of this agreement shall be brought in the Superior Court of Arizona,for Pima County. 21. This agreement sets forth the entire agreement of CLIENT and WestLand with respect to the services to be performed hereunder. There are no understandings or agreements except as expressly stated herein. 22. CLIENT may terminate this agreement at any time without cause upon delivery,during normal business hours, of written notice to that effect to the other,in which event this Agreement shall terminate 24 hours after the delivery of such notice. If the CLIENT terminates this Agreement, CLIENT shall pay WestLand for any expenses incurred up to the time of termination. 23. Any waiver at any time by either PARTY of its rights with respect to a default under this Agreement,or with respect to any other matters arising in connection with the Agreement, shall not be deemed a waiver with respect to any subsequent default or other matter. 24. All notices, requests, demands or other communications required or permitted to be given hereunder to WestLand shall be delivered to WestLand at 2343 E. Broadway Boulevard, Suite 202, Tucson, Arizona. \\Admin-wp\c-drive\MyFiles\Proposals\442 WP 13 f-zone reservoir cont.doc Page 3 of 4 85719. All notices,requests,demands or other communications required or permitted to be given hereunder to the CLIENT shall be delivered to the Address set forth below the CLIENTS signature on this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have executed this Agreement this day of , 19 . CLIENT WestLand Resources,Inc. Signature: Signature: Name: Name: Title: Title: Principal Street Address: City, State,Zip: Telephone Fax No. \\Admin-wp\c-drive\MyFiles\Proposals\442 WP 13 f-zone reservoir cont.doc Page 4 of 4 G TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: September 1, 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL FROM: William A. Jansen, P.E. Town Engineer SUBJECT: Resolution (R) 99- 88 , a resolution authorizing the amendment of an Intergovernmental Agreement with the State of Arizona concerning traffic signal maintenance. SUMMARY: In November, 1983, the Town entered into an intergovernmental agreement with the Arizona Department of Transportation concerning the operation and maintenance of traffic signals on Oracle Road within the Town boundary. This agreement provides that ADOT will maintain the signals and the Town pays the electric costs. This agreement presently covers the Traffic signals on Oracle Road at Calle Concordia, El Conquistador Way, Pusch View Lane, First Avenue, and La Reserve Drive. ADOT has requested that this agreement be modified to include the traffic signal at Linda Vista Blvd. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution(R) 99-88 2. Letter Addendum to the initial Intergovernmental Agreement with the State of Arizona. 3. Maintenance Intergovernmental Agreement FISCAL IMPACT: The monthly electricity cost for the traffic signal is estimated to be $100.00 per month. RECOMMENDATIONS: The Department of Public Works staff has reviewed the proposed Addendum and recommends its approval. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION PAGE 2 OF 2 SUGGESTED MOTION: The Town Council may wish to consider one of the following motions. I move to approve Resolution(R) 99- 88 OR I move to deny Resolution(R) 99-88 Department MI6 At Town Manager RESOLUTION (R) 99- 88 RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN ADDENDUM TO AN EXISTING INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE OF ARIZONA FOR MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS. WHEREAS, ORO VALLEY is a political subdivision of the State of Arizona, is vested with all the rights, privileges and benefits, and entitled to the immunities and exemptions granted municipalities and political subdivisions under the Constitution and laws of the State of Arizona and the United States; and WHEREAS, the installation of traffic signals is necessary for the public's health, safety and welfare in order to provide for the safe and efficient movement of traffic; and WHEREAS, the TOWN COUNCIL deems it necessary in the interest of providing for the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of the TOWN OF ORO VALLEY to enter into an addendum to an existing intergovernmental agreement with the State of Arizona for the maintenance of a traffic signal NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE MAYOR AND THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA: That the proposed addendum to the existing intergovernmental agreement with the State of Arizona be accepted. That the Mayor is authorized to execute the addendum on behalf of the Town of Oro Valley. Passed this 1st day of September , 1999, by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona. Paul H. Loomis, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM Kathryn E. Cuvelier, Town Clerk Dan Dudley, Town Attorney Date Date ::l bARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ,�%?. INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION DIVISION JOINT PROJECT ADMINISTRATION 205 South 17th Avenue- Room 293E, Mail Drop 616 t �5�� p _ oF� Phoenix, Arizona 85007 JANE D.HULL X` THOMAS G.SCHMITT Governor r; ��, State Engineer MARY E.PETERS 21 April 1999 E.JACK HAMMITT Director . Joint Project ,- :. Administrator �ti1 n6isY •v Mr. David G. Hook � �, Town Engineer ��`r ;,�� Town of Oro Valley 680 W. Calle concordia Oro Valley,AZ 85737 Re: Master Signal/Lighting Maintenance Agreement Addendum Dear David: Find enclosed two each originals of the above subject agreement amendment which adds the intersection of SR-77 at Linda Vista Blvd.to the agreement. Please obtain the signatures of the appropriate officials. Upon execution please return all originals to the undersigned, to the attention of Mail Drop 616E, for state signatures. Questions may be directed to the undersigned at (602) 712-8369. Sincerer //i E. Jac Hammitt, CPM Joint Project Administrator End. Highways • Transportation Planning • Aeronautics LETTER ADDENDUM In accordance with paragraph 7. of the Agreement AG # 83-733 Secretary of State #9044 dated 6 January 1984, for the operation and maintenance of traffic signals and/or highway lighting between the STATE OF ARIZONA and the TOWN OF ORO VALLEY it is agreed by both parties that the following intersection be added to the existing list of intersections to be operated and maintained as set forth in the agreement: State Route 77 at Linda Vista Blvd. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY STATE OF ARIZONA Department of Transportation By By PAUL LOOMIS MICHAEL MANTHEY Mayor State Traffic Engineer Date: Date: ATTEST: By KATHRYN CUVELIER Town Clerk A.( . CUNTRACT NO. 33-733 JPA 83-07 ?aCMAINTENANCE NO.. .. . ....FILED WITH SECRETARY OF S ATE INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT Date,itled.....J }„�... ..�....r .2 ::-4//61. BETWEENd7/44.,&/ THE STATE OF ARIZONA AND THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY THIS AGREEMENT, entered into pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes, Section 11-951 through 11-954 , as amended, by and between the STATE OF ARIZONA, acting by and through the ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, hereinafter called "STATE" , and the TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, hereinafter called "TOWN" , WHEREAS, the STATE is empowered by Arizona Revised Statutes Section 28-108 to enter into this Agreement and the Director of the Arizona Department of Transportation has delegated to the undersigned his authorization to execute this Agreement on behalf of the STATE; WHEREAS , the TOWN is empowered by Arizona Revised Statutes Section 9-672 to enter into this Agreement, and acting by and through its duly elected governing body, has by that certain resolution attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "A" resolved to enter into this Agreement and has authorized the undersigned . as its representative to execute the same on behalf of said TOWN; WHEREAS, for the safety and protection of the traveling public, it is necessary and desirable that certain operations and maintenance activities be provided on the State Highway System in the TOWN. This work shall include, but not be limited to the operation Sheet 1 and maintenance of traffic signals and/or highway lighting at the following locations : US 89 and El Conquistador Way NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter to be kept by all parties, it is mutually agreed as follows : 1. The TOWN shall set aside sufficient funds and be respon- sible for all electrical energy costs to operate the traffic signals P gn and/or highway lighting. 2. The STATE shall set aside sufficient funds and be responsible for all operations and maintenance except electrical energy cost; the responsibility of the STATE includes monthly tele- phone charges for traffic signal interconnect circuits when utilized. 3 . Any new installation or any betterment shall be based on a traffic engineering study, and the mutual involvements shall be negotiable. 4. All parties are hereby put on notice that this AGREEMENT is subject to cancellation by the governor pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes Section 38-511. 5. THIS AGREEMENT shall remain in force and effect until . midnight June 30, 1984, and shall thereafter be automatically • renewed for successive periods of one (1y year, unless either party shall give notice in. writing to the other not less than one (1) month nor more than three (3) months prior to the initial expiration date, or of any renewal date hereof, cancelling said Agreement. In event of such notification and upon expiration of the term during Sheet 2 which notice is given, this Agreement shall thereupon on becor;ze of no further force and effect. 6 . It is understood that this Agreement will 111 cancel and supersede any previous Agreements for installation,Ilatzon, maintenance, and betterment of traffic signals and/or highway lighting y on those State Highways which traverse within the boundaries of the CITY. 7. It is understood that the list of location (s)s) set forth in this Agreement may. be added ded to, or have deletions made, by Letter Addendum Exhibit "C" , with all other ' conditions set forth remaining in effect. 8. it is understood that upon the termination of this hl.s Agreement for any cause whatsoever, allro erties which P are the subject matter of this Agreement are declared to be property of the Arizona Department of Transportation. 9. Any disposal of properties. subject to this Agreement shall be in a manner as otherwise prescribed by law concerning ng the . disposal of public property. 10 . This Agreement shall be filed with the Secretary of State and shall become effective upon beingwith filed with the Secretary of State. 11. Attached to this Agreement and incorporated ' • c rporateci herein - by reference is Exhibit "8" which is a copy of the written determin- ation of the appropriate attorney that the TOTS is authorized under the laws of this State to enter into this Agreement and that it 4 is in proper form. Sheet 3 STATE OF ARIZONA ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BY: Chief Deputy State Engineer Date: . 2 /983 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY By: -7> ATTEST: Title: or., •* Wiz.- L: 4* L• 7 eA-me Date: A di Date: I • Sheet 4 ,1 S.-STEVE"ENGLE.Mayor !�1& �� - 4;0.� r - JAMES H. PETERSON. ViC9 Mayor �� i` KATHRYN ARMSTRONG. Torn Clerk JAMES 0.KRIECH.CouncilmanMi HENOEASON&OLLINGER,Attorney PAULINE R.JOHNSON. Councilwoman ., COOLSY-.lONE,S&gSSOC.•Engineer LOIS M. 4• ROYAL L•�MBEASON.Councilwoman *44 )r.r� G.3OUSCHOR.Magistrate , WERNER S.WOLFF.Chief of Police ort • gat 4 4) . ZA. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 680 W Calle Concordia Oro Valley,Arizona 85704 Phone(602) 297-2591 t � "A motion was made by Councilman Kriegh authorizing Mayor Engle to enter into the + Agreement with the Chief Deputy State Mag./neer far the State of Arizona sna Departnent of Transportation. The nction was seconded by Vice-Mayor Y� and tinanircusly cai-rzed by a 5 - 0 vote." I certify that this is atrue excerpt taken frail the Oro ValleyTown Council Meetian . g of 17, 1.983. Dated this 2�2r�d day of , .1983. L ("1" ( . •r APPROVAL OF THE TOWN ATTORNEY I hereby state that I have reviewed the proposed inter- governmental agreement between. the State of Arizona, Arizona Department of Transportation, and the Town of Oro Valley, and declare the agreement to be inw within er form and P P n zthin the powers and authority granted under the laws of the State of Arizona. Dated this2ay of 19 Town Attorney B • ie- jiL-711:S: To ' ttorney EXHIBIT "B" OFFICE OF THE 46.40m et. tthrn2tT (l2xtzrzI! 5-Fpg. , C 4, ROBERT K. CORBIN �' i'_' ATTORNEY CEPIEJ�AL " TRANSPORTATION DIVISION 1275 WEST WASHINGTON PHOENIX. ARIZONA 83007 (602) 255.1 Geo • INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT - It , • DETERMINATION . •- s A. G. Contract No. .(f- .. #7,53 , which is an • agreement between public agencies, has been reviewed pursuant to A.R.S. Sec. 11-952, as amended, by the undersigned Assistant Attorney General who has determined that it is in the proper form and is within . the powers and authority granted to the State or its agencies under the laws of the State of Arizona. No opinion is expressedas to the authority of the remaining parties, other than the State or its agencies, to enter into said agreement. _3 DATED this /9/17 day of )7ergi7,44-as,' p 198 • . ROBERT K. CORBIN Atto ney General i eVie / .. ......# 0 ...< , ,.._ 4,4_m-r-e...e.,c Assistant Attorney General 'transportation Division TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: September 1St , 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: David Marsh, Planner I SUBJECT: OV12-97-18A, BRAKE MAX, ORO VALLEY RETAIL CENTER, PUBLIC ART BACKGROUND: Brake Max is a 31,903 square foot commercial building pad, Building 9A, located as part of the Oro Valley Retail Center, also known as the Target Center. The owners of Brake Max have now selected an artist to construct their required public art on-site. SUMMARY: Per Section 4-504F of the OVZCR, all new commercial related projects shall contribute 1% of the project cost towards public art. The art contribution must be certified in compliance with the dollar amount prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The public art proposal has been reviewed and recommended by the Public Art Review Committee (PARC). The public art for the Brake Max development will feature a "glass mosaic southwest picnic table" and benches, inlayed with coloured tile in geometric designs and in the shape of a roadrunner. The public art will be on the outside of the building, facing Oracle Road. Due to the size of the drawing submitted to Staff,the exhibit displaying the public art will be presented at the Town Council meeting. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the proposed Public Art for Brake Max as recommended by the PARC. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to approve OV 12-97-18A, Public Art for Brake Max, Oro Valley Retail Center, as shown. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map of the Public Art On-Site. - Planniu d Zoning Administrator Co ma unity evelop 1-nt Director 4/1 Town Manager F:\ov\ov12\1997\12-9718A\pubarttc.doc . • . /110411111111,211111.0.MMMMM aft I 4---- --- - -- 1-T f —‘, - 1 ■ 11 i -----�--, \...,..re",,v,r, r-- 7777-7- \ ' -/_/111111L 1K ' 1 ..r:., an Aor.EN2 Mitelmil dit Op EP 21.on NIS im an mo ...,....ger ini gm in.....ai \‘'‘,.%.\\/::/*,.. I 1 *.‘„'.," . I N , ,,,;.,,..:,, p.........._________ ...,.. A , --.....;,„,-- \ ,./ ,- . , iv ----• 1 . ., , \ \ / 1 ' : \ , tv=1 ? N� % 1\ ' .:•• ,.., .„- \ ♦ 1v , t j / i ,- r----- 1 ,r---L----- 1 \ i t i , 1.../ F I ; I "I\ ---/ , / .11".."0 aAte li\lia ';':**.::.:‘:.:- `\ `♦' ,'atiC , .�\ t •0 "•5%• t � t I, 1 tI 4 , , .„, ,, >\..,, , \Ii / 1�� I L- ---1 1 A 1 .17:411 :77...... 1 ' 1 1 --7-7-7,i/ 1 I A 1 . „// / ii/////4 1 ri... 1 1 1 ! _..........._--_,kb.% ce/... ...e3-..................,, 1 49 1 1 1 1 1 t t i 1 `; \il i \I 1 1 A 1 1 u - -0-4 M. J __—.....—--If-liV•7'•'•7-7Z••:''It'..... .....—---- _--7-- iLL` - C `] el \ s� 1?,t)(14E ---rAltc-rb 5 Hopp#41 ?cios)ey Mi c.4 e 0 (HM. 3 Mo $oIC49uAJe6+ CA");°*----T:41":848. ... 6 A-.. ,-Y,�-ii.• �sal� ..+tit.'.,,, �e r ix '*4 -"4.47-74.••••!144,5'.%:i- r .• '':. Ro i Ic ''°" • >. ',.�`:::-mar,,-y "` TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: September 1, 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Valerie Feuer, Senior Planner SUBJECT: OV12-98-1A RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 11 STONE CANYON GOLF COURSE TEMPORARY CLUBHOUSE AND RECREATION CENTER LANDSCAPE PLAN, LOCATED WEST OF RANCHO VISTOSO BLVD., ONE MILE NORTH OF VISTOSO HIGHLANDS DRIVE BACKGROUND: Stone Canyon Golf Course at Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 11 is an approximately 239 acre parcel of land that lies north and west of the existing Rancho Vistoso Golf Course, north of Vistoso Highlands Drive. The golf course development plan was approved by Town Council on May 6, 1998 without the clubhouse. The recreation center location was approved by PAD amendment on February 3, 1999. SUMMARY: Stone Canyon will be a private golf course within a gated community. A temporary golf course clubhouse with associated parking has been combined with the recreation area required by OVZCR for all subdivisions. The golf course membership will be available to a limited number of Stone Canyon residents, while the recreation area will be open to all Stone Canyon residents. The gross area of this project is 15.40 acres. The landscape plan shows a large number of native trees, shrubs, groundcover, vines, cactus and accent plants around the temporary clubhouse, recreation area, and parking areas. The required trees and plants are shown in the parking lot islands. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD ACTION: The Development Review Board recommended approval, by a vote of 5-0, on August 10, 1999. GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE: Planning Staff finds that the Stone Canyon Golf Course Temporary Clubhouse and Recreation Area Landscape Plan is in compliance with the General Plan land use map and policy 9.1H, landscape improvements are to add aesthetic charm, interest and character. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 2 RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval of OV12-98-1A Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 11 Stone Canyon Golf Course Temporary Clubhouse and Recreation Center Landscape Plan. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to approve OV12-98-1A Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 11 Stone Canyon Golf Course Temporary Clubhouse and Recreation Center Landscape Plan, as submitted. OR I move to approve OV12-98-1A Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 11 Stone Canyon Golf Course Temporary Clubhouse and Recreation Center Landscape Plan, effective on the date of satisfaction of the following conditions OR I move to deny OV12-98-1A Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 11 Stone Canyon Golf Course Temporary Clubhouse ind Recreation Center Landscape Plan, finding that ATTACHMENTS: 1. Landscape Plan / / 0..,/)3 w 1 Planm��'�� Zoning Administrator A ilk I 4 ,L, Co•-. 'ty D-veil p ent Director 1 / 6. ' i /..1) Town Manager F:\ov\ov12\1998\12-98-1A\LPTC.rpt.doc 7 -5,/ j p p, V Of 9' A N 0 m 03 a) 2m: p7DyO.O !HI mi; '_ D, 00v 5m iI m Nmmn D 0 y - O„.......msI D4 , A („f,'1 ,t, m D m !.. N zm z ,zrn ,: D6,—;31 331 z NIr” z o c» mNr NNrvop rmr -p pN �g DZm rWD Dmp - DOO r ••� �- ).8f. �.0g . D 6-X8o D "'N p . <mM?D Z M8D� mZ Z DC Zp DZ = Or N Pi a2'1 ' - 0,pp Nf m p- ZWermrD � � D �DljC NmA •m ZDZN p 0 'm Z2Nm Z'? 4n1 mNmhW F‹7); z X O ZZo IVz( D mrn4 -o-_< Omm r- I soj �D)iNz- o r pZZzDOmN mD - nn - sRe [:',1- C ZZ mr D N DNp�D nt m AD R Dc O Am mlel�u V„h mm� p O Z D m D n �O mDDgm _nD mr-4 D` 0* Z Z pO nN 1 ri= O •p O iYe 312 m O N(v D D D m Dm _ C 8 il, OWr v r 2;N5 �O-N mN n mO �Zp V N? Z.-. (4 � 1 mm 2). 253 mcl O v D, 2 D p „ m c fel t N 5 r .2 D 0 ;v O 2 m O , r 00 -,z -? r wm O › p NNv Eh ZD o • _/� m r,?:', Q p m A 6I D N r Z O �w n n m ZmA Iw N J p N T.cmc li m g Z oA Z z ms Av / D Zg a D F2 Z- OZ Ao 10 DW p�C 2 Ell n _,.. mi nE 0 O 0 — -4 ,&....0/- -4 :k440,,,\O /, 0 :b/N;ii ) NMg4,5Q C / m�Ocn–_ fr!. " N N��C � ODmm i \ A I (Vi'' r • 'ic, co 0 nt xi 4.,. „......y .„,,,,,,,,01111%,--4.4 , (E: ::j - OM di---____Tik_ Cm§ 1(1:'0_N 1_ Mt\ °Z i m C (/ Z (�(WfJQ C m ii, , .., o_ s o ,,- a,,, ♦/ 7 TOuun +�+ iT �_ . 8 ,,,, C 8 p m D EV 1 m Ta Ci)Z � 1R. 1447 t�2 st O 1-co) 4/' .(1„, ,_,,,„,-r: : ON o O ZC) it ..-:‘_,' .110 r=id m�,N N m F-,,.› x *-.2 0 cn`I ,mNO 0�; ��,,�0 n E.OmZ Itor ®4414 - • 9 \\ . , L. DR•g m m O O iNN� �• .0 ' PO Z Z ?,A •-: `i �'\ir., c m 5z E nnm m • . Ni > R, ,..,r-—N W 7...C T" D 1 �b� Z L ca.�,� D mT • AM i 9 W t Do. y 111111 /ill: rwlli 1 ;r. :...\.... .. + Q6 'T ZC coo !O � ,io c r I • r. `ppp o00= o000000(,©o O .....300000.3 .,..,:>1.,...:2.... )..: 0. ,,,., • "10: ieq 1, i i;1;1:1 ; ili"Ot N 11/11 li * nil > - , ';> ' R > i g- n 1 PM 1 al 1 h 1 pg . ,,,,ma -. • ..,' -/' ) ,;. ill N i > NN i 1 C > A is ,' (401) .:4--.,:::;-!--:„.------ .. c •..._ .s1 ,../ i . .. - ..- ; . , i 1 . ,.< I - ____, ‘,1.9i7_, < - vef.tf.:-- : . , ) ............._ . ,. ,. .., , • ,..- : I ;,,,,o : lit;ip ill 1 iii i ii ill i ,, -y- oirol , ._, co:d w IR ;� 2 0 N § _ingt ill hl is /211941 I 11° m c I� �,:• �j ..S~1 / �/ Ply 1 A i si 1 pp •A •\ '' i • LoSY iR ,_ I • K x'�a' ,0 r i I i i '�ti,• '' CI)ti ': ,,. . / Co:' \ , ; / i 1 i a i 0 ?,I, ,. 0 0000 V fg # /�G _� I '+ ?: . tt:P'''),:osirlilli - i2e',..,‘--w,..1.7.1. r•!4INF01.-- ..-417`.......4....—....., ... . a I ki . . .4:'.Cli&veccgi -141.. ;.:10,1s1k41,,/ i ! i . ,i,k,x7c ‘•--0.x, )-r*,,, i --. i • COW c 1? 11 1;11 i it'',,Y::a;:li**,,,,,7,1j1C,Sifb - -•-.- ',‘).,:i.V.f,, d,allb. ( :I 4 'PA.a :., '''''''''';';4,.^:i.,,(.0110:4,..`'Isi. ‘.,:x/LkstS4s:•:".„,, I,,.‘4N.•- ,, ,:41,,,,., ,k,414 i .':, .: 41 o ill 0 :i‘!2-7:3.. V/,1„,:74.:12),,vptiVie. C-1.:,-1'!J-: 14( ,rs. 411/.:,',Z4' ., 0 z / � *�,' r // Slip --i;"; - ..7, ,-,:'-'s va.4,,2" ' ii � $o %may •� ♦ ,<1 — i �tt�' �i ' ,� ' , . ' ".:1.7' ,i7,8', OCID10) e.: (41;4.7tti. ,___"-- ::Sqi. ) /40:4' _.:. . . , , .; „_. i . !:,. ote., i ‘-‘Z. 641i7-•:N ' i '%Lia*--$ / 1 .14 SI* r''''''' f t i t Q.F.rI+ 6. .,/ ..: ,:',;',':_i 1 ..,\ :: 'N /44 ', 't,--of) ,„ . 0....'',, . '.../ I ‘.'21‘• i \ , ! /A i ,,,---,:_. .7„;,-;.,,,- , \‘.--1..z.,,,-,,,,, *•,::-.,-„ ,,, 1 , ., pni 7 i /... . . .-.. ,,,,-•.... ,,r) I ,/0-1'',0 • - . 1 , • -,�'` '---' � i'� c /�~� /Yi •,__ j�^, 1' -�, �Vie- t+', rf f \s- _ /^±"--;Ss 'i '.1 ... -,j _ 72, •_• , $�•.oaf .'4�` A.,-!,,,x,,..- i ' ././ ' ;•'" _ .-- may. f I ,X ',.:7.'N) wN - /'`.'� 1 0©i�.�}1 0� j )5--i7, �� .ice -- �`:, �=_�,� 11'•t rte\`. ;.� ` �� ,��-" S `` ]� 7�,`�-�,`7� ',i I �: \ , ! ``O-...A. %,\./Ili 1, •� �� • � <:-i-- J i }J,1 ) ,§`,� P1 \ "�. �)-A1C•T� :'.� 5 'K1`•,\\\ �g♦ \'� •'� / ./��`� 1 , . ki ss-,.., '..---.., !i --i.2-_,N, ., ''..,..- -', •\•;)Y2, . •.:"-\\-- -- i X A ,•, • i ,.. ...., . , ,,,.. ,\ •. .. i § 1 1 E I 3 ... . .: ..1 •V-.--.:.-:: : hi, , 8q..,:::....„ `� (:`+,t C:/ `A' t'1 ) i i\,,,r, 1)t :.,: i7,.,;/.-,,,,.. i`�/ x - I.t"3 kV :/',.,:' _, 1 i.i .1%..4--.,- -.. < to, .c. -,-;•,A•,\,,,,,,-;,- 1_,,,,7 X,--,..,-,....z;',. ',-=',:,,, '. AA .-.11!....,"!!!!". ., •� . '�►� .SII- ti• .'--..0144-2: + ' ::;./.:4:. '/10, /4-4.- Mill111111M1111111A� ,.*:•..4.5';--.7-7011. /t ,4''''.'°:'�_ •-_�,. .i 10*°� -_.�1�:►�►-, � ' �. � `{ O . ,, ,1.61,'-v4,-..-;:„.---, -...-2,/ %::�lt':it.Oto 4, -- , 1' 1''11 s -•��-si ,,, ,.,- - ,:z.' ...._, off u.., . . -•,,,,.. , . 3 L:'' Vis'-., " ...,...,Alb-d,...A,,,,?,,,,,,,;„_,• -IraNetli'.;:1,11,•\:•,,.V;74,---D.:\„,,,,_ .,.. , :.„. (Li-1:2):Z, .t , 0 0 .. 9pil , ---2,(../.....,,,._.,ii.o. - ,,...-,-,,.,..„,.-...,r.,-,.;:-:, ,iJ 11 i0.;-` rr '/a,,`I(n::----, i'.1;', �- ttt' -` SC"� , ^. t A ' \Q�) s 3 17,3,41,0. .' . no ..i4 bar,. :f e" .'.-:„, .��._:'� '`, -) &k %,_ , g g§ 1 0 — II --7----.. • 1.C0. �'RSYm c �..." . _�� I q c rn z pow c-x ► .., ___ 0 . o z ( 4. ,-,. 4 +...gra_t 1 0�� Z � ' `•t � '�. �; ' `,. • 11104\1")113 111.-......11."111111111 �� ..<- 1 1 . -.''''''. .-,M2 •J':-, N /' >..:'.''.'P., 0 Atip4 • immiiiim --. - -..':--:- - :titti\'' - - • . -- , ,.. -,---- ,......-,-, ._ _ , s_. iirept, ...:. . /.. . :-:-..c.i„,,,,..-i..--,:.......:-.., , ____ ____---) . 0 ..0.10i:, ... w 4.0 . in 5.0 %I 73-8„W •. - . 0„ _ . , , s ZEN rcl j' s: `. 1 . •• l O i t ,,... z 1,10 ri Z Z ( t .(''�•,t'! 1-:* ..)•1'�r - ., ., ...,-.14-- k, 1.; -.J�C; 'J a,a • i }i 0 O /w `I I' • 1. N O_ W ]lo-lM,p. • J ; O . , . . . U N 1 EE1 w0 pgi$sriC li tli� r 1D 1 14 ilOZ ii,,, nil s Q j O �• ATF. g $ pI m z ;E. o l oo 11 � �_ �i�ggz mgi z 4 �;� Id �`�1El > '' mpt 1 j� y> Z 2� D = Q > f7 N p I D DDD � D � m N m= g2 =m 0221')i'mc^a yo mi rml v 4 rAi v / / I 2Aioi> >A 8 .P Od \ $ A z Amo > D zl�� �W A•9 ��� C�)1 cA m � m ��+> i ��m 2 n O !m -� I / RQSRi rv*N �C m iz� 'Zs g•r, 2 O p c'D • I / G7 70 I N�"� ]° =Z N; X 9", Zm 4Vf . ,2 m m In mA 1 / 9-1 €; k c 'Al ? o= $ g v 1 I ..p�-tc =m NO mO �- Ul>� r O � � I iil o 8 2 I 1� iia "--'1vogO ^i aFl m o O _r m -t�o O 6; X22 v n 3 A D 5 A TOA O § > F 1 1 stn M. N§Z m Q S*t r5 G p 1 1 Zo vZZZv .,.N cA. zF v D z ► 1 A '�P 9 ami 1 ' 741p0) -,1 1 \\ t 1 \ 8 I C11)‘ • B A \ ` 131 P I • 1A-1:_ m z, _Q Fel ' '' V\ :s.S4S(''. *'‘‘ I ' ''' 1 e >1 (24 i 'A m 2 gliFilP,2 g s., P',' 4 ,,., , , , , ., , , , t ';zll i R -,30 8 P A g , ' ,: , , , 4;?. ,,-; ,,a, . ,-'1'___JI- (---a,-..-:,,,_- - \ \ A - ' rc-'(' -„ 2 / tr , , ,.77-,\,)% .,:, _1\ it' — „ R. \ , X 1 / t, ,ir _`, ,..i,:;ii::' . t : 4 , ' / i 'I - 7: ' ,,,,,-.:•.:4 f `\ -�•_ _ -,.1.k�/ - / 1,-. 4I1; , - I.\7:,7,.12.\.,.,,.... (',\„\(\\ \\:,1 (ANA \N4.. // - 7,H '. /I ‘,...-I.--, T A, 1 \ Z TSA \ !i � •.�.'I/ -, izo ‘‘, \,......;,,,,., \\I\ -,,...\ \\ A� il� \, 'it„, .I -2 r \ � � 1 I \ \ '., N 1: I 1 R.55 1 \ :0-' / 1 1 •\ \\ \ h: / \. , \\\ \ I \ z‘z-,/// ,,_,/ //' \ \''''. ,,.,, \ /////61'."..., "17_17::_....1.--...,,,, C, '''''4 "---- _ ___-'.'-., ' \ '''' --''') /\\\i'') \ j '''''' \ :2,qpir,-- `. A...... "Val\ f__ \ ,,,N4 \ \ m_ \( -1: illiiiiill 1 R 1 \ _........., 41/ •••., 7N- i INN\� - •%yam '9 ilippi \ _, . , . raw �'\i,' I-,,I 4i 44mtiii, •;. -...4----1/4,1 �-/ ; ‘titon t—n- lg gip r • .. mil- ... .3 ----7- ,• \ / ' \ 1 N ,./- - 4 )'' ,, , . .. . ; . ,, ' ..Y'8 3 c-5 ‘ ; \ /,,,.-,,,,, A V4 m9, _ ��� ,��' �, / - r \\ ,. ..,,,.....,...,11 \1 I / N1. Epw, 0 go z 0' �,` /� / I J /• , I w >,.(;)' Z VI / \ I gym' 8.2 ' m O p ~'`-_/ I A zz h0rn ,, r-` • _. _• > Tom. ;'t Y/ Z ZI- c,+ 7J " A O L,, 1 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: September 1, 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Dennis Silva, Jr., Planner I SUBJECT: OV12-99-1 VILLAGES OF LA CANADA FINAL PLAT, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF CONGRESSIONAL WAY AND NORTH LA CANADA DRIVE BACKGROUND: The WLB Group,representing Kaufman and Broad, request Town Council approval for a final plat for the Villages of La Canada. The downzoning for this property was recently approved by the Town Council on March 17, 1999. This downzoning allows for development of 80 single-family homes on lots of approximately 7,200 square feet. It is located northeast corner of La Canada Drive and Congressional Way. The Rancho Feliz subdivision is located to the west across La Canada Drive, and to the north is a vacant land. The property will be accessed via Congressional Way. SUMMARY: The proposed preliminary plat illustrates 80 single-family residential lots designed with a similar lot size as he adjacent existing Villages of La Canada. The proposed plat will be accessed from Congressional Way and •onsists of a 55' buffer area along the western boundary. The western boundary will include a Bufferyard D and part of the recreation area, which links to the main recreation area at the southwest corner of the proposed plat. A 16' Bufferyard D is located along the northern boundary of the development. The 16' Bufferyard D also runs along the eastern property boundary of this development. Sidewalks will be implemented when La Canada Drive is widened. Staff is requesting that the applicant pay an in-lieu fee since they will not include sidewalks in this plan. The property development standards for the proposed plat are as follows: the setbacks are front—20', side— 5', and rear — 5'. The existing zoning is PAD High Density Residential with a conditional zoning of Medium Density Residential. The maximum permitted building height for this subdivision is 25' two (2) stories. A recreation area has been provided in the common area on the west side of the property. It is being submitted and reviewed in conjunction with the Landscape Plan, which will be presented to the DRB on September 14th. Per the Zoning Code, the recreation area must be approved by the Council for approval of the plat. This is addressed by Condition 4 in Exhibit A. GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE: The proposed preliminary plat complies with Policy 1.2A of the General Plan, encouraging that the location of residential neighborhoods are close to activity centers to minimize travel times. The proposed plat will be located text to future neighborhood commercial development which will promote pedestrian linkages between the uses. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 3 TRAFFIC: The proposed site is a single-family housing development that will generate a total of 844 calculated trips per day. The site had been approved for an apartment complex generating 1,794 calculated trips per day. The traffic will be able to disperse in a such a way that it will not have a significant impact on La Canada Drive providing the following recommendations from the traffic Engineer are implemented: • Minor widening around the guard station is needed for a 150-foot queuing length for left turning vehicles on Congressional Way into La Canada Drive. • Restripe La Canada Drive to make a 16-foot refuge lane for left-turning vehicles. This refuge lane should be the entire length between Congressional Way and Sonora Drive. • Place a 12- foot wide 100-foot long minimum right turn deceleration lane with a minimum 100-foot taper length on La Canada Drive approaching Congressional Way from the south. • Raise the elevation of Congressional Way to be equivalent with La Canada for 30 feet back for sight distances purpose. • Prepare for signalization by the year 2010. DRAINAGE: This project site generally drains from north to south with onsite generated stormwater runoff entering Congressional Way and the soil-cement to the east with both flows ultimately reaching the CDO Wash. This )roject is affected by 326-cfs from vacant land at the north property line. This offsite runoff will be diverted into e soil-cement channel along the east property line through an earthen channel on the northern boundary of the property. The earthen channel will be lined with a soil erosion blanket, covered with a thin layer of topsoil and hydroseed. The channel will be irrigated to ensure vegetative growth. The onsite-generated runoff will be collected by slotted drain at three onsite locations and conveyed into the soil-cement channel. Only 37cfs will be discharged into Congressional Way, which is a better situation than pre-developed condition. GRADING: A grading waiver was approved in 1994 by DRB with the following conditions: 1. All cut slopes shall be benched every eight(8) feet,providing a three (3) foot bench. 2. All cut slopes shall be undulating to match the natural terrain. 3. Limit fill to no more than two (2)feet in any location. 4. Slopes shall not exceed 3:1, nor shall slopes require jute mat, grouted riprap, or mechanical means to hold slopes in place. RECOMMENDATION: Staff finds that the proposed final plat complies with the Villages of La Canada PAD, the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised, and the General Plan and recommends approval, subject to those conditions listed in Exhibit"A". TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 3 of 3 .SUGGESTED MOTION: The Council may wish to consider one of the following motions: I move to approve OV 12-99-1 Villages of La Canada Block A Final Plat, effective on the date of satisfaction of attached conditions listed in Exhibit A, attached herewith. OR I move to approve OV 12-99-1 Villages of La Canada Block A Final Plat, effective on the date of satisfaction of attached conditions listed in Exhibit A, attached herewith and the following added conditions: OR I move to deny OV 12-99-1 Villages of La Canada Block A Final Plat, finding that: Attachments: 1. Exhibit A—Conditions for Approval _. Reduced Copy of Final Plat a jp., aL.,....„ Planning. Zoni Administrator iitii5(---- . Community Development Director C 4,CUS2.r...- anager F:\ov\ovi2\1999\0V12-99-1\FPTC2RPT.doc EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL OV12-99-01 VILLAGES OF LA CANADA BLOCK A FINAL PLAT 1. The applicant shall pay an in-lieu fee since they will not provide sidewalks along La Canada Drive. 2. The applicant shall correct inconsistencies of plat information and coordinate file data including, but not limited to, the following: • Centerline data for Sand Trap Way and Tee Up Way; • Common Area C boundary data and square footage; • Boundary data and square footage for the Common Areas A located adjacent to Congressional Way and the Private Drainageway; • Centerline and tie data for Pitching Wedge Lane; • Boundary data and square footage for Lot 533. 3. The applicant shall submit a blueline of the corrected plat for Town staff review and approval prior to the submittal of the final plat mylars for recordation. 4. Approval of this plat is dependent on Town Council approval of the recreation area plan submitted with the landscape plan. 2 7 y c $ •2 2 y+. 11 P ',y o . :, . Y ! SA N a 1. 1' , o Y + 1. N - gl 1;114 W. PP1441: N; 0t; OV Ili g! Wi1 N wW i t1 Z=9 I x li pN ,ZNGi1M > � 1 ii A �_il �_ !. GIN 01 i ��� ` : g � <!. ei di 0; OF F 0'zii, 1 . g i S ,� vF ,l 4 i�� � 1� �g ��`'�<� �,' �� � ��� ���, ,��m� A �g=� � ••I +, o § 11 1 $ 4 I c F gg ii N13al< 4 2Il N� 1 a > i ih 1 Zz 8 '1N> ;"i 1gA 0 A A P o 4 RA qf 1" � `� S 4ggHI; `-9 � Si; id P��� r'1 Rm a o iQ 1 11 o �� tl � '�' ki � � .� 4411!!!! 1 AA-_ig!$1 a !s is _pg iA 84 RI P �3i;; d if 11 ; ; ; ., , , A g p n!s:ql ig 8 Y0 > _ yC i s ���1 - is0,gi al N ;>A+ i i 4 $1 u ctiff 1;g2= eA4014rig g g ; -§ as >§ ; JS 1 :g, Al ! 4, 1P N '� Pa � P■ 3 N ��t "�° 60A*rQO�A{11�� �>y cziu� _�f>1jj.�.!1 >i � �`�� � �'° P ��s'��p�pp�� ' g �4'��j� 1 � < >p� 'SIA; ' � i � �, F b "mea°W � � 1 461 AI 5� j � �ps �11 8��� m; 1 e�� F, li li 4 .5 il; • ��u� $rout•,,43� �rqi:' 2 A pii 11� �" P; Uh �� A� � �9 � A 1 1� Z� •s §i 1 of S8 1g < 30 > 1 y , ii z tato AI , ii 43, <= 4 o A i( Z OMMEMEMEW 9 $ N = . 89 5 9 9 9 9 N "IF 1A;g;: , i;MI 4 6 n 1! q // G o ' -T- 0 F i"rs a 2 0 7 % rpl Pi > i X111 A n AgY�L#{ 14 hh, E7v �1 11��" TF,1D?:' ziGro-8 q a� 1A zif1lif8 9$i 3.q $a ,,,>�i ,ql r��'E;bvF yi.- z; �?MpO Q N c, n Q � 0 r.,..! "v 1 f y �Ci 1 +gWA 11 V G �f� nom '. JII -I 5m �" % P m e� 9I -' l 1 1'hi h ,1 or N ccl h. N . NIPEA '§ A! 1 4 61 / 3 1 A iiiig §1 4 I 4'xc;I ,,P g 0 1 ! i ® 0 pi “ii -, oo $ g S 8''98 !A •; b ' i 91I a 1 ' 1 4 1/ prZ 4 0 I ��,z 9 3 y= co< < .. a ' 7,',.I % 0 d14; 8 ; e' N^ p t o S .•Fp s l N o a F, zD 20.0 5'708. ��'3,�:�000�N�i°'Y.rrr�J�°,f+'N^ '°a`^ S.b � aeqq++��t'ia�pq�pp� 2 t�� I $ � 1g� >�RJZ I � �: +GOJ�-aPO4 000 N fA N� Y � �� `^ ��m� S �`� .� >�� f•1� IO ��_ 1 t•1 YY'' AA Z $> i 'A AP1911:, Iiig4q01 § '' 1C1 II m y A- X i o0 0000 O 9 1, a n O �s e`�i�. 81'x- _ m o (n h op N., 8• (n I k II . v. _1 j I 1 1 1 1 1 t 7'S • $ $— +--,3 71 Q _{ 1 n I i S I 1 I I N. i I MN, I I•.t6> rrp� <90, ��99. _ m r� z rn 0 1 I I 1 kit �1�" _ j` ' oli i nia%0-�.4,41�, SRcg D n 0 a z I •�� �N4813'22'W 222.32' N , ,.jit C,.::'' /,'41- -gym c n x Z vtiiitr&NP00,0140*.slarlintkli —mk., ®r+_`%i�or -gypwr �� �M � ' �irn., ,liitql . D ' . I' c a 1 K o o cn 8 M ' r • i) OA 4 ri °P, oul g 1 ; i ' . TA,q r, _ 1 e 1 iii?' 0 ffesP, 1M1 i m D W I SETS CK Ei s. _■ .w ,� rn + IF „._,,,,L., IA kN F-, N �„ 1 v. C ; 62.(n N cDIy O1 11 v \\� \/,,,/\ o D N O 'i " 1 4 1 ,° r•'•• 1''�..'• ••; f ■ 1111/NNHINIII R , "' ...,, MA . I, g,ki i ,r•: %i; 'cr: D f. O !f■!1 ( j 117.10:11:1 10 I I _ II I tt .,(; fi r. 'f1 IL..IQ �/ � II:irsi,,..4.ig..,..,. 5"';ofN1' .. 1 C � O I�I L*I 1i I 0 , -: mi. ..1 . k, Iiimimpwej 11, 1, ;f� O � 1 I 2/ 1 �!!r�� 'on ...7 \ \.114,44.6.7117,14 i, . .--- . iiirt7:4,.:0!"-.....,416‘...0,,,,11:4: •Vnill,-.-:_L._.......- ........ ---,-.. ...---'----"''''''-____2..,..1-- r.Alti ftte01,,,, :rq zr;Z W F 2'3 g1 1I i`!� �1 Nii.taftwovb 1111�V, 1� "`Y 1\ Qii 1 C 'T: 13 rn 7i g •i I M \\ I \ \ I n-7 OLF 9 11 AO Al lr to :� Fn OR� �L, � N 1 Li N N i O I I I 1 ail N, m m F., n 4121 \v%Ogu AOA O rn O N A �.In r ._` �\' ;,� i m o i�> D rn Z 1N� �Li O m�J� � \�` �,��b - O ...V ft', ik P I I 1 4- OD k a" Nc� 2ilci g-53,_<,(22-0 >, a c� in ;:= 8 $..1.®O . . •p I 1 I N �, #,I N r9' .ei6 ,r_,.. o` �o� J v < K8 ® r� Z z 4NO•8mpv 2�� 2 v � I � III l v ;<� r �o '•.��uF r'i i \ U , Wiz. �^-4 y R v Q }, DN D '_\. D ����� Ll 1 7.1 Ai �� idlg .11111 iliiii li 82 wow �s.,\\\ Fpj1§q1d ! ii! {p,, Q o g,. tg000V % 51 2 m j '> 5 • �'� � >m �-7 ,4,555 -" g 1 pQ r��] 1 A D xi_ is, -.NNN N T 1 L v� I!! 1- 2 i OV/ ... 2• 73 YL> j I D C N n l',-.112 C0)U� L1,A AJ - r71 -1 n Y p� Y Y + �+ ',1 Y o p' v w Y ! N P P .`J ' Y + I.' N °c ao� �� " _ $ � �q fig' !� iii s ��5�$ z=' Inw S +ii 1 1G " 0 1 g! E111i •114 i zQ� Q z ii P a 1! 6 A 4 L154 �y?1G G on h. E < x Ail g C ' A r � 1!J : Z� �" � . � +I 051 p >� � � � ! , � t$ b- � � ���� ,, FF 5 i_ : L ;`4F 40 a ! it F3c=i ; `� _ 1� � 7'0 .Y'.' = A ' ' a!A ;GoI^a g� E � _ �> �� MI � :_ ,�.. •� 1-a� 1IB 18 >a 618 'm g 11 1 i 6 F dg lil3 s; 8 = I N AX 11 A S1 P i 1,!IJPJ i c, S > A� 8< a4Y;Ilip P m8Mm `q RST , F a '`tS�j 4 g pi ~�r� 3 C � $1 � '<=3 � µ� a'2 q' jAi4 to 1 .E 1 i 3i 51 G =oG� rn1A � � �> � � � �'� > z ;,i tn= `Zn 5 , 4R3, ZR 9 ;* Vin n A7 +1 S1 (N�1 LQ p> r ; , fA {�]{ -. r rm F� rfi� z 07PAgl � � g ZKKKQ{{{ (� r� � >y � rA�' � A opj'• �_t � I O � lf�gA �a,p < l !m '� � > 8>Pi M '� ill � G � � �i �:.{15 e g ^� 9�u{ y� Q i N >A,o$l = Wi ^��� _qR 1 r >Ia '9 ' ; IR •� ��li N p c F AR li _ IA • _4.4 8 G 11 gal igliir • a ii�� o � mc�36ki 2���_ tl Q F S1{ 4 5/8 fl3 `2 ' MH Q �i ^q;X1 �'i 4;TIM,. F 3� (J}3i p �y $¢r� a > i ;' f o vI viNN NWnn•� ,5> Fc4P I m s 7 Z CAI NR ramf�0g 0 ;g Q` 1g+P _ p <_ NZ 0 ' ro=tOC 8 o >E A Z <a S. In Q �tlj i A 00 � �� 0.0;30 zz $v o � m gQ�vo; �m .. vai� czi ^Ine' > o �i� �' ! a !� 6 It A imimmommow i P N ± $ 40 00 k 0 " u ca.r.L., R i s• INT �q > _ -, 4 , 0: p,,-.____. il.1.7 0,4. g A li :I! ! 1 P 11 '0Q 11 1 Z 1 0 g v�NO.(18. iN2(�4N+$ �i ilAi 6 I; n Fi„. A � mm 2I Y'G N'S(9 �7 T 9,PgAii: j/1 al ,y ;.i 4F P �ipPof 9aN F1 96.11 h ii i:r• G1 ) §i ArC ,1,g 1 z ' ' 30 s > AIL° .§..' % P :A w % 1!v EAF,%q g qg 4 p.P 11 cx'igi m 'A •a 0 pli :,-; i 1 4 14 4 ig l'i 1 D ' lfflii il � pOid J� N Na .'+N N' PNo A $g m + f„N., aTolldx? lg Iw<�,a , 1 I cil— vI® 1; S 8i �3�11< +- ogg 2 g1 S ge.taa S Ip ".5k , 3 ig x a HI; 2 I N I '2 . il a ii a Iii ' a ; 1 ,' g 2 D 2U.0' S'TO d. ri+u m i-74„OOO p.g.•OO Jl•.�j pUJ w ' - Si 0-•'•1N3$i Pr's+ -> rx, I MI 1 t Ft y'HILLL333 ' I 8 �'Q ygp _ 8 ' 1 N In. .. Op fV,tJ p x T i1 lit Fi < j < 1'O VT; r11 ' '.'§ toz z 9: ero A P 0 m 4 ;Ai 6h10 0 i, g R. 1 lgl a g > 4 ,, 27!", 1 2 ; ' '?.. R (XXX)0 _3 r- '7— -(-3 4 X . o�Zrn nN= a' !yy •• z I t rII' I I 1 1 I1 t 16 ?s-� s 3' m '&3 m In 1\ I I \ I ( I v• i M*`£t 1 I IOtt- '��� '9 .9$V I-71 D O O D n • I 1 1 1 1 or "��•o O�A�• 9 o -� � + I I j VI 1�' 1 _- —_ .,irrdrori ii,\ F`..49kAril, fR"'� D Z i� pi N48'33'2--222.32' ;� , ''..•,�q�' �ao . ' r i i. z ' / ,,,,,,Irmi-iriz„„,,,,frewRis lot,1 io,i lit, ... , i)7.-;,. 13 ,,,; 8 m 1 1, 1* '.- P — ---\-- A ,li till T!.,°:.) 1 ,_% 8 '-.) G u) 1 !I 1 `-. 4n r' ,__: 1[ 14 c, r' g i r, g 1 ii, .: ... 'Pp_ .... .4 r ,,R r:P, rTi ; w i 11 SETBICK lip ,, ii ic) \, O O 1} •11 I •..:;01• 1 J r:� ■ 1 •Mr!? IIIIFI/N//,,,!I, it i, O �jX/�\� A S j o I 4;;:t l�� 1 4,I m ;, . .� `7 �� ' I T _ .,..II 0 9' ,_/.,/c,r y' i c'' I ro I; I Il(11 /, e't.;,z�'x O ?o I 4 II'.�► r'Q s ,I _ II I= PM 111111PRE • ._< .- Ileligto , -...autmilt ii .3. . ) '-', 'unTriter4 40 r }. o I 4 ri co I l i Z til 1 J Ny II Igl, IL '1'/�4 �r/ ,..,... _ ____,_.___,....„...--........ .--....E ,Nit korfAi ' lt :,',,V,Oczn Z 111M 1 a ill I i It&-- V* III r } �, I I jj��' ir...� `fir r m \ , 111 V1111111111MILW 'r �\ 1 II I1 ci 5,3 Q. 'I _ .--)14ZyCla=g1Pft01100y""*.--;d1".. =-I,,,,rt I I ' fif,"€ rn -`-',4 t( \ Qii 1 73 8 ,... .... NOS., D II I I I • O Oyp o2 • N p o N � < 8n ' PA2 .71 0 r u I-�2 . OD ci NNn � Y 0 -----_,441 ? o 1Y- D m 2 I! --1 I ' r'§'D N l'\ UNob 'NI � $ I7 yg s9� � Z " Oa o , -4 ,T. ,3, �� ®O mi- ; to(1vZ 53 ,II , - r,v ♦ Y±)- 1 ril 111 1 1 1 1 1§ 1 li PI 11 1 i i i;1 1 1 i i i!>-° . 00,10- ,,., to, \ ›,, r- 7 0 (, .).! T. 4'1 0 Z P i ! 1111114'.10; "'CIP§ii 5S1 z 1ppp�> QN+ �%, xix 't P'“ N N 2 -1 N O y 101010 Z ...� y > -� I I mn P M X d 0y 0 XM 7 R 0 X q 0 X PP i •,i 0 i R e-? 3 r • . • r ► r I. 8 1 a 111;1 q' 0 �� 1 a= I �=3���� 1 �I E 'a� qui 1; ?U 1i1 11 !IN XII li 11 m 6 a 0 1 i E I I� ? i T? a l f ;1 1 . I i 4 , as�R�4 Q qqd� q��� � M� �d � 1 Mg ��I �� r�� q a yggqq h P C n 0 l g E $ : r q $ 0 9 a q 11 L4AE � � � �� �� g a�� 9 F �qAq �� •-� ■ Q< � Ill d � �a iOA � � � ��� L �Mg i ��� � a Qy � i 1� V il 0 a,1 ■1 zII 9a 1 las _ 1.010:4a01 11 a lip l ir_ .i _Q 4 :q $ Rt J"�a g-11.110� I I� 9 �a 9�� �!la I. a y 3 0 ga 1111 lip l � Y4 � >� � 'Al �� �.�� ��$ .�T. at 1 al E a Iq , I li 1 i ■ii z■91; a Y lir.g i ig l T As 5� a ea q ''o' i6E : G l_P a IP 4 i 1 q u t n " ■: n Ixqn 5E 1 ; qi I l 4 4 qi Ity 1 1 11 l� ■E g< g a Q4 66§1?bE ; 6 . . pa Dl Q� �■>Q a l 0 � � E,15 s!g� �: I .I 1! Q�'a g4�i1�� ic, �>! S 0*'Ii Y!€�II Ao el ...� '� G 1111 11,1 � 5 • ii 8� E ,� 1�;� � _�1qFi . Sy��d� h7 � a � �,V0 ig 'p 1 . d l a . ; § l i ■I.■ f,a C �O5CCy i 1 ql % , q 6 a . P. a E o P i 4 ■1. _V4 � b T qq � Pi � �i .. � �� h F ra iq g 0 "�!■ it � a � If ■1 i a . $a �■ 1 AE F E .I: a I a I llin' a l li. l 0 S 1 IQ 4 "1 a g I1 li X ti r t ! r sa - G 8 Q i zI ,:ig . 1� i 1 I _ Y s *1 11 fil Iti * i d 1 ) 1141i• i i i i.; _ 4a la ; II:1 e §.Y.Y O t 7 tig N r 4 N-M N y-y /y� F'�M.L g O w 1 i. M In M< 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 y ) i Lil i 11NR41111 r ► I1 n e Q 1 1 j a c 1=1.1 3 f f• ' !I gi ii!II P 1 1 Q I ' a ii w !- ; "y n ► R S 4 -,..e.:-.,-..-..... P P C P S P`1 N kr N `N St r-12(1 pu'„fo Z ,, A_1n 1 A l *;11 m ♦ • Vim'" ♦ v 44,74,..r‘ I _ 1 ILO, 5%)°,9 ,i _• S °I.1117 rmit .'!--13/4)1110';‘1. till : %\-4:\ !,, 01 --7----77-, - ' .40- , 2,,'',(.. \ WSw ' 0 )-\\, ''' 1 Y( ' .. vicT., ,•.- ' - ;.;--1 ,144, . •�,� _ � � 4!_f --,4p, " 2---,,-, ;,,,-------,- -'2 .ii :'-,iI,I,(— ,c:,i,sg i',11. A iNfo.) ,tdtti, „--,-....,.-- ...w.Ti.,----- - ------- if 1•# T.0,04 m I, m sv# ---\ x-Nip 's'al _,..----trtX— -- ' ,.*?(%)< 2 ,y1 ,-,0p, 13,..„_,..,—,,,-*";e• —......... ..41., ,... - ii 0„,„:,!or!. 2,4,:`6',"0 :rci-i .R.1,! )• / all leir f4P.-L--.:-.^;igi-.44w' -_ c -;,.'• "fV4Iir. Fi SI Itlrici-A O z 3 al vAmiliiiimir-". ' ,47, 3 0 I� !'-i 1; ‘imili ..4- I ' Q V. 73 t/ / :ii:v • Fi ' ''' 0 ••' ‘la '--1"-- _._.--- „iii.000.0.011101111911"1"7"."....."1"111 ,$40- ------------.....___ a ' i * .**V - -iiiii.1.7 .1 — . • 4— '-- -,_-..._-- - ---.-.--'4"---,.."..........._ftit--wili i ,,,_ • -1 I . D Z 23 41 Z NN N as Xi 41."''', Z ['s%Tl•.i �o Q _ (Sig 0 m o ;',:r°73 i Tr; ,A� z ;Eli s . Tgs .-2',--; op � I I n1 1 I N i r— �� 0D2 5tnQ 3 $ * h o bN- v x :t /7 • eapor, 1 1 1 i ‘iir mitrA iI, % (ci. „,,„,-z... ZO" r _ lit v 1 1 1 li c' V''' 01,4 qWAOE ^Z Dp0 4, . N `. _� � 1 1 1 p T m p O v m m Z Z �mm m, m m, 1 O 1 m< 0000 - w z � ; f N * f i In n n * N $ A 1n A z Dn rII/ <° opU1. . -0 O O O O n , m Dn OJ ao -1 -1 -•1 ' mn O .f iKii - O %'.---- w On +s mm vmo Vmf R cn Z m o Z n * f u1 f cn D 4 z on Z.5-). ie .1 ON OZ v yr:, D Z A Z m co n j > m > z \ 72 . z 2 0,--:„If..3 o < 2 = V m v 2 rAm m 4 ymmR2tpo oN . cx rr,-7(' Zi v 6 z S' O m R. R. z R. CR' * VO f �. ' 9 0 Zm . � z - osD D D 0n D; u. ° a m c A C Z , b 2 n r' W qm m D N N:\185050\NE1GN10\PAR-NWOOELS\1044-1,1001.DWC • -.Ni''I. r� C)ag /11\ ' ,„_'-' / _ ( , _ ,, , , . (i,, ,,,..- .,,, ,..:- , , _,4c)-- --. ..40i0 J � �, 1 s.1__ __, 4_ *fi\\:t,. ., HA___,_ ,4,_____ :__4y__,.i � :::: 7 w\ Z tsal '''''rif?NV . ________ t , Iz p., - \'''9°.'-‘1.'''..---4--:''':-.'-;:.'''' ' ‘8 1-- -- / ' - t v,:,........,,a...." , ,- .___ . • \- NI -'-----------__j", al '11 •:Yf':.ei .,-, .-- ^€' i -------,•.-----,-„. �,Lj I \ 8 L.: 0 \\11:::1(':- N m iff t I /.C%.. " \_- �1 • lig I. =_ �{ . =ss= ; l • j CN i ` // y \. z ++�,, ---.,,—„,.._--,t, ems`\'`:w.. i - as ,.'2" i'!1 _..... i i , ,w, %:'-': i'-V, At :.,44\11:i%,,,, ,...,,,e)) '�4. ` , `('• �tD 1(:''.‘'IT „:....,.,,,>:,,,,,,, .,E , ,,, g-,° .a *-7:-...,,,:,..... r^1__ 1 tdie# ' ,, /. , 0,... ..:_-_,..---....,-<-:-...., _,??,4417.T.Mt 4. '-- ..., ,. --, ,, N ,,-. ,-..4 go '11.1 .Alli.% \ ,!•• o 1 ...,--• ::.<<.•- .'41k''''•-" ',.' '.----.... .1411 &YAK '''',. ,.;,*fr % '' '''' ''' Ad /`�.., ,, `\ �' , - -�\__ . iia '�+” = ..._.. . . ....„,...... -11*, -.`<f ,'., --' ,J4*A11W—liAl _., .- ,00 - --- ' " 110‘,,....,-;:. .411,,,,No.,,,,kies ,,,J 'N., , ,-- - 440,1 im.0_,,,,,,F _______ , ;_. 7 ' ..„-- Wtitil:W48. )'1414 .1P-7-4.4.4; ,*):"''',7,-4/113.1Z illir- i- iei, ,,,,,, - -----f._.-. .,,,,,,.4p\ .. l .• 4 ).1.6saik,,,.!71,-../4 ,o,,,A,4.,,,;,.-., --viii,,.L, allou •� , i s -ii --7 -:� ,�f..- L *i. -_- -------__... ..---.0 � .:J lIOCI A - - .,.......--„,„...---- -, ' .- ' 1 •`Th ' 1,..wilr&.,"..V41,„&"Itglite, ". ,...Affli:S-,P, ..---,,,....i , -,..,,, ,---4,----= - ----. \\ *.. ` I/4� 1<-, , co, 4u,_,c7.1--.A7,17474_.16) �. :':._ _�z ��ldi1.► '\� ' i8I l - N/- I—' �,�, • firrz----;:------a.wo �rit�; 1f,��4w�iiL+[i�:�1r11�(I/.►7.�1 �i��--ja` '•Il‘j� s$ / Cr 'o. '''Al ' '-I re ' i .2r:".°i''''1,7°,1 dr.:-..,,_„.„...-17S-V--41-- --117-7-,-.-1-11935M4lAtire//4 .---''''' ' i..ri . iiii , -17----411 —I – 1,....,_.,,,,,,. __ _,•, 4, ..„ ,:::, ,-„,,,-. ,• , , ,,,„..c,L._ ,,,,... , 7.,,, -.:., -,q, i ,.• N .- 7 ..,...,......,• ., ,I.:.::_.;., -.. 0 44,,,::::: :.:-.:..:,‘„,...1„..,__ if ,,,;: ii, it ,,,: :di:.iii ;,:, ______ 4.-\ , 2: ti, 4ai,:_t_. -# ,t'a- il*--.:...i:!“., 'Ark . . 1; -:i • .: - • [ P-..: , ., ,, , ® 411,- -..- -'! _,01p...:./!-'' i 4, :---viii,----, :oar wi..... .i, @, : - ,T •L , ik : , :4 L.9%.'.1,,,:v i,',41..,: ig 1 Al F.,: i/"-..' • ,- _ , .1•_• ...6.1,4,t53*,,,l- rte..5'i li l�/ ,, , $ Vie ir J .a.----.,....._-''''.-1-7__... ...i........i i i.._...---=---'7-',---- ______'''.------., . ..ii. .....IN I I"..,4:;. , ,4, , ,,, ...0561w, „....____„:,. . -- . :,,,,.,....„..,,:,.. ...., ___. ........ 4,..., (s \ I / .. "7" ..,_______. ----. ..— --- iiiii0!______ ,i, -- .Ar -____-_i__. .•! .. P 1 ,‘,19AWIliffteklik- , 17.10600....._,40611........,- ._:.-,--------. .- _ T-----------------. . iii -- k.4*--71'4.A( Pii.V" --4 // .•-•-----"-- -"" - 111,66... ..414%:". ."'‘'. .. ------4hiln ,,,,...-- ___-,-,;;;....- .--_.___--- mi..-- "111111L, . . . ., : ,. v ,‘,11....1 .___ ____ . .... _ ,..,.,._.,0 \w_ ._ \ - ------ _-_,---,,----': ''....----'''' __, .1.6-------_.14161,...militillik--ft"."---'411111111116.- 111141ENMISILIWN- - 11-""'"111. 1M-416„------ - ----"""5"--------\';—...\ \----- *--- _-- -.111111114,11141111Lizr.—. -VIIg1;k111;1ihs.144;a11/4.-- ...L.11--_\ s.' „..,;_i(----) _,---, .. --;-.....---. ,..;,,,,z, ..:-.40vosso _ ..,------4 / ____./ --___:_?....- ......k.iii....r --,-:,,,, ,„ 0 -'7... __ - ,___ . ,:••• „•:.:...:., ,. „, .,:,.,..,,-:,:. ,.,4 .... .,...:.,,:, ___ 1 ..+ iO ( �_._ gi ,...1:; A14Or.,,..)„, :.4 _____ , „. i/ k 73 1 . F 1 i , 11 52 Q. tli m 1..., o- -=.• IP "4*.ii- `� 2$2 rip �, m ;Fiqr- I II �_ x II '(5z XrrIE ,r... ___E__4 X le Gm-f zL [ al N M S NN i 20' ^7• `� Iblol a yO�yN�� . M _, .f7 , A .ao N oZ - x r o N LTi r N Z N:I85050\NEICIO\PARNMOOELS\ION—MOD2 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: September 1, 1999 ti TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Dennis Silva, Jr., Planner I SUBJECT: OV12-99-10 RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 10 PARCEL N MODEL HOMES LANDSCAPE PLAN LOCATED NORTH AND ADJACENT TO VISTOSO VILLAGE! EAST OF HIDDEN SPRINGS DRIVE, SOUTH OF VACANT LAND, AND WEST OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD BACKGROUND: The WLB Group representing StoneCrest Homes request Town Council approval for a landscape plan. The subject parcel is 4.56 acres and is zoned for Medium Density Residential (MDR) under the Rancho Vistoso PAD. The subject parcel is located north and adjacent to Vistoso Village, east of Hidden Springs Drive, south of vacant land, and west of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard. SUMMARY: Proposed trees for this development include Thornless Mesquite, Blue Palo Verde, Whitehorn Acacia, and Feather Bush. Thirteen types of shrubs will be planted throughout the site. Two shrubs, the Turpentine Bush Ind the Chaparral Sage are not in the Oro Valley Approved Plant List or the ADWR list. Fact sheets were submitted to DRB and both shrubs are low to moderate in water usage and are non-allergenic. Six types of groundcover will be used for this site. The Green Dalea is not on the Oro Valley Approved Plant List or the ADWR Plant List. The fact sheet was submitted to DRB stating that water usage to maintain this groundcover is low to moderate. Five types of transplanted plants will be used for this site. These plants are Mesquite, Palo Verde, Saguaro, Ocotillo, and Barrel Cactus. Landscaping is located along Hidden Springs Drive buffering the parking lot and cul-de-sac on the south and the eastern property line buffering the site from Rancho Vistoso Boulevard.Streetscape Buffer Yard C along Hidden Springs Drive and Buffer Yard D for the common area along Rancho Vistoso Boulevard will be implemented in this development. GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE: This project landscape plan complies with Policy 9.1H which ensures the preservation, restoration, and enhancement of the ecological and scenic qualities of the natural landscape. This landscape plan will use native transplanted vegetation to enhance the site. Hi ! 0, ; ; ; 53Pm-� ND rp IICcam r�4 Tl D>pmp D P :: rrI g D §g O PmD91mD�D Zry i �mpm !isl rslri p mpAD$623 pNmMp Cim 9r,--, NN m -,,,,,-,,,,,,g; D W--7, mm m Om Zmra p ' , -,Vii, -c3 Ug CO f mZfNz NM°5 123z,, -q-> mvp { m 0 oz Om rD13 FPI N m Z nNn(D TIz, riil op r9 3 mr" - 6;232 + m v Znm mEo 'mp = v >O°A� i 0 m� D� mO Z � -Niti D rg O ZN zAp'"$o FD m f,--),vm ���_E OA D N r ( nZmNme �o�Ig1nw 2- D�N D OpoN z i P.'- -. Opp T3m�p O t Dx„'m� o Oi Zr zm 1r D N DNpD �, DOm N -D E0 1'^OiO pC mm OZD m ZD P,t. mD 2 m ONo07,a, L .✓ DZDmZ O gp � C S D m (Ti19 2 O (np rZ D N im T. 0 E(1 m i�K 111W'Nm mD r'' OZZ7, m n 7Z m (/(1ZV DN 0 mm 530p 0 q p 33, mIpi, . m JT r O OO D p2 D (�, -C -1 D 3;O Za g z O r m O m p c L-DAr () O ND o 1z ZI Z z N n n p N Q r r m m z z^ esO to fTlLE ', - - \- ,.1.74' . *IP it �'” ��,.,:,q ''''.7...3*,�� ` C7 \ \\ N N .LD7 a ' o\o . LW, � CA, . t� , � � ,--' .:Ai. " 0 p L ♦ ,s ♦ ♦ N./14-, ' 1 1 \\\\ . PO' fD*1 \ \\\ \0 .0 , \_. - 41/ a, -), ',,,.. , i,v, S 1 NMI Co' ''''' ' "11*144 —4 al*. ..' ., — •.., \ \ o.03 o cn 53' j. ,,4‘ ..0 �R/tiIF i 1., ►�\/". I �rxn ` U,r �O 111 (__ . C.) .-'2. 11 -6,C<Ir(11-j13 4 ' al O (,'N‘4 ? E,-111 i Z (i, r D > . _ t glik c—,:C3 :7- niiivP __:,,__.__----------- ARD, - '`1" --, /I i/Le?..... • I2J: M. 4 L. ,__:,i-.;,:z ,-..9� c e v_ S E c •o wma^•A. O mm i owuus �o9 ik,„,..,. .k ,,.poo E3T ikr5- : 5,-ci ,T, 0 Nor �- �. 4 i, rum. ,,, 0,1> z -,,, --Trnrg-1ir Atli 'I ii), g ,f..-„-c,), tui 0„c7; .-5, rn S W e ITI ..all Z Z �a. � � DOO m 4�"�v+ O� 1..(tiVWuA .8>s,-,r;8>s,-,r; . Z +u S32,(3 D (it NT Z m ir "� I O all Q fn 9 i P �/, C) G0 cn Ti -i cn cWa ®i Z C) D _ OC) D �� -_ ® F C) oo 'o e'Pz r` maaa i©)DZr � c C r0 ig _ 00 00 0000 cop®a 000000000 - Z m 1 C OC7 Z W SQ AAAA �� r) I ��xtiVcn 1m > > giZ» A ?>p A vQ D 44; z 4 ��-Z z > ; N z zi d g g ; gr4 'ci r:' !' niP: ! ! '25 N 0, 4 pp. m z 4 �m�8� Z W C z z _ 1 o > �� D A S_0 y D > D Ail') Pi i)2 2 g 2 ' SSSS TN m y > m r D > r y q o � A � c�o�o j p Z t i C m C7 C7 C) • tiI z y z y v� m.o> v g Dr%1 ci�m�o>a' J � �) � � �ATZ ����8m=r�mgoA open} n N + u C - Ngvg +t �� 1 O '1'2 \ 0 N9 aL, <z '0 v3z�>c,3 z 1p m, z ^<� 3 N P C z P OriTg6A! Z 0 `h Z all m g;'>> z T -° v c Nqm M r 4 ml , ma(°U�i > F N >y rmid ,.0 D g NN D m o`< .iii Z D U 6,-N 5 o co NCJNNN'N p albu 8, aNN-gzs- C ,i57 NN Z Z - N C +n G7 C) UI cn ,'>) + + 0 N N w m m m N N N m ----___i_L____J /Tc — - ;,_._. ------ El• 'al. tic l. ...---_-_-__ / 1 A _ ,..._ t g ", ‘„ e k WP., "4% \ NI .40.01,4p - , 0 :)2s 0� se 1. 'i_, ____:::::::,----:::___--- ol_o 41, 4.)'8, /1/041 o kV ,a o> Sp ;f y /- J J +t r0., �` U byO:-O O. �G_ S 90,oa� .0;,,!01 �u"` '4(.4";:i...1. ii` 13Rive — dY.o0q0�_ O4n jO' I.l�O Off' J ~ 01 00/V.u..� J VO/�• ���� D'A� O t,. V�VJ�A .000 0 00` l? u. �► •u �.°.►0►, 0p0 ,oj0�'-�..i.I°l.. �`.1�.`��.°pOlpr C: �`OC�y`_O.�%, O j0` h°�O.°���'Oi w J.���;���.0.O c..�01 �..7 1'O V�i.>7.p�• QCi O�OC �C� 4 O .+ .� + y1. .--,`-yam O�°. Ooh. 'Lr o f �O�,�l��J o0{�cots °""tet- . .. .-c•,•D oE1•D� =,'c, a�,ca- �� c'. _ e„) /off.o c �oa' '�tc�, 9 fd) D rtl.,., to*c;,, , @_‘, .„,e,s0 oiviv LIQ r. co Voe v6,r ice. . r.z —......�A, .i s l o-;t�WO WASH •� NCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD - -----— ------------- .�-_— I.o 0 z \ fr m o � O N o� Z ,z O /` ,1,'->. .� ,\ N,N ,: z z mn0 E"o 0 _1rnc O 8 >R.v, -u �O P,n5 3 zoo Z o A 4.= Z v t( -3; 'd. _ i Dz ca O r O o m N � w O 7 ^ , .O co V co co . W N —x, C�e W a J O g al ,g ig rq Lorg 1:1 ;(1. rc-310,F,Ili': 2 I;IIAi ; 118 . -. SPy gN#FT mDv- gzF A -' elO l 5 rz 4 Z , . _ ..cg=TE, ; \+ e� p2m zs m�Ai Z --az , vgN aI4A o•* 23 >' , * 8 1yO H >A 2 2v22 Zm2 z2 2 1 .t ?mAg ;iig mQCr2gz gm8FO m' xi, m N N x ON , fem,r26p,-.-,2s 'Z ,-p4 tq •co ¢W NR -_,V�Tm�O NNa, mGNZ p prip O :4A$ u5 vZpO ppUpR \A rZ MM2 T. D C si O oz 7Z A mao aF7s_ g-. =r9--15@ z9n°� mc m; p.. pppFA GWZ 0Tg 2O 32Paor Ng *5 § ,2gt?'. N ' f A X 2 0 :LT 5 o 2.i 2Z'il; S 12A , S ° amocoi rOC D 5 NaFm Oj� O p NN Fit0`ocp0.a�oN ai ZCZm >Dm O Z III _ . 53 m g a, a; O .T53 N qr p O m c�° D n2 DV 004 N� p N b 0 0 N§i m 1 AA OZpm ��F o4mi m I' D . - r m • 1 M ,I ( z v4 '„. ._ ' / i'ci g \)\\ *VC2 t',t ,�zp ler. 0 \\ 1a az ? 1a •v� m >2 v `' Q � jOQOQ z;:)m („:, __ 010 40,. , 1111 • . P col' m v III ,' • ET: El(' q\ f 4f 4i,./ • i >,. .s 4 tww,t f 4 ( * • •—• htil . .-,8 % eft m itir P.1 ow •A • .1-, -,„--„„, 4-,'-, .J'%o ___. E04-. Sp iti, \ <_______—____ �/� by Q. _....----",--_,..- ,...,---- ___-- .gr-.01010,;:::,,,,.-._. ea — - _-_,-- --- ---- --- �■7p �°�l pp,r00® �f O ��� r �� • 6� d.G .PR Off, °CO—�� \ R' .� _"fes' ..' i Or/ '' / ,'.G`31* �i 1 Mte 1/4:11/ ' • ------ - ------ -0/1,4) 16: ;11w .�o- i/AV •y^_ ..":-.7*".-• �, „,,,,,,..4.0•© ooh-' 1111 p.01-°ozpC �to90 /,,Loo, at'kio 77 -„.--i:' �'-o � �..�o ,oo � op��\ ��°o©aoe o��.v =,.�'Za�_v..,.,r � - o � -+ I°' "o°�;o$ (!%9� oo °° o ok 7—4%-,s o(� • N c:9� 0000°•?„'° °JP o r, o�ooe ( `5. ♦ cs_° . . o ” oo ono . q ••- � 4" �_1 0.97' a � o� -10,,0;,` i R� `Q o o d ��-�`� - y W '°O I �° IO. Ati,„,.......C,° , J p 0-Q Y7��+ °'.. q.0'1;i -- i �r PAF.' \ Otp O pq �� �'�� C O��°p"AAP', O _- J��O iI '1�o ,��-•-o,;o �°0�;, --.coo p. .�. 00 0 � k. � ©-'�� ►Soa�o�o//r� • e�no po,©°'o cjp o._, ,..":•61.14127.10244.7. oto o�� 4�0. � g !---"r ‘14.-'' 5ara ---",-,-- ---,--,:--:gas � -ao�::.;;,4.44.404,91,-A-0-4,20 �� C `\� T 01) , _______/5 .--,--,-::-.;,....„,,.._,..,-,;,:, -_ -.Lr., I I A 2 i gi; a s , 1 .4. / , r.,P--a k4.4 I A Il \ / I < 11) 'Qk' I''....._ _---..., 7-4-7-- - ----- -___.-- ._..- - ._,-----tit_ \ --•'' 0'.' 4,,,»Nr,,,,,,i)4,4,4.44 tias):"Li '11 ..-1 0 • • .,a iti—AA-0-6 Lt,''•Ta.. :t -----Z_---7,-,,----.'.•,:.-----' '.„,; � ` - 73 m o _"- 5 --- --�- ATCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD-I----c rn 73 O _ D ,� — ------ i .- I, rv' _.-------.-- m W<nNm C �a e, Z m D v O :'113 z G) `---— r°- 7-CM3. r = C 7 -a C w 0 O TI W TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 1N' COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 1, 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL FROM: AINSLEY ANNE REEDER, PARKS & RECREATION ADMINISTRATOR SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT OF PUBLIC ART SELECTION COMMITTEE SUMMARY: On November 18, 1998, Mayor and Council approved seven to serve on the "Public Art Selection Committee." Due to a variety of circumstances, four of the Committee Members are no longer available to participate. This Committee is responsible for selecting the art for both the Canada del Oro Riverfront Park and the new Development Services Building. The following list of individuals has been prepared for consideration. GOVAC REPRESENTATIVE: Carmen Feriend (Formerly Richard Eggerding) PARKS & RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD: Gary Chandler (Formerly John Russell) TOWN/COUNTY BOND REPRESENTATIVE: Bill Cassarino (Formerly Ken Lawrence) ART INSTRUCTOR: Mimi Griffith (Formerly Don McGann, McGann& Associates) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: If the above list of names meets with the Mayor and Council's approval, staff recommends appointment of these individuals to the "Public Art Selection Committee" for the Canada del Oro Riverfront Park and the Development Services Building. FISCAL IMPACT: None SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to approve the appointment of Carmen Feriend, Gary Chandler, Bill Cassarino, and Mimi Griffith to the "Public Art Selection Committee" for the Canada del Oro Riverfront Park and the Development Services Building. ilimatjtaa,le i ''; L9 Parks and ReGreatio Admini trM•r 4 -ii,ott. i dr ent H�., , / 4 , , / Town Manager 2 TOWN OF SRO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: September 1, 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL FROM: Chuck Sweet, Town Manager SUBJECT: Mayor and Council appointments to the Oro Valley Water Utility Commission SUMMARY: There is currently the need to make 3 appointments to the Oro Valley Water Utility Commission (Commission). Three seats had their terms expire on 6-30-99. Those three seats were all included in the Mayor and Council's 7 original appointments to the Commission in 1996. One of the 3 seats has been vacant due to the resignation of Valerie Hoyt. The two remaining incumbents have continued serving on the Commission pending the formal action of Mayor and Council regarding appointments to new terms. Staff issued a news release publicizing the opportunity to serve on the Commission. It was subsequently published in several area newspapers. As a result, 10 individuals expressed their interest in serving as a volunteer to the Commission. The applicant field consisted of many very qualified candidates, including the 2 incumbents. The Town Manager convened a panel consisting of Councilmember Bryant and David Hook, Water Utility Director. Interviews were conducted on 2 evenings in recent weeks. The panel is prepared to make recommendations for 2 of the 3 seats at this time. The applications of the 2 recommended individuals are attached for your reference. In the interim, Mr. Mcgill will continue to serve. The panel suggests that all the unsuccessful applicants be considered for involvement with the Commission through its several subcommittees. Also attached for your reference is a draft revised Commission membership list used by the OVWU. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this request. RECOMMENDATIONS OF STAFF: It is the recommendation of the Town Manager, with concurrence of the full panel, that the following individuals be appointed to the Water Utility Commission, serving a term of approximately 3 years to expire on 6-30-02: 1. John Dohogne 2. Leo Leonhart TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION PAGE 2 OF 2 Further, it is the recommendation of the Town Manager, with concurrence of the full panel that the constituency required by chapter 15r of the Town Code, be assigned as follows: Constituency Member 1. Residential (Countryside) John Dohogne 2. Residential (Town #1) Mike Caporaso 3. Residential (Town #2) Jennifer Gillaspie 4. Turf Carl Staub 5. Commercial Leo Leonhart 6. At-Large (#1) Nicholas Vale 7. At-Large (#2) John Mcgill ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resumes of the two recommended individuals. 2. Commission membership list (draft). 3. Excerpt of Charter 15 of the Town Code. SUGGESTED MOTION: The Mayor and Council may wish to consider one of the following motions: I move to appoint John Dohogne and Leo Leonhart to the Oro Valley Water Utility Commission, serving a term to expire on 6-30-02 and to assign the constituency of each member as recommended above. Or move to 9 „ . /.4 Town Manage APPLICATION FORM FOR WATER UTILITY COMMISSION TOWN OF ORO VALLEY ARIZONA LEO S. LEONHART, PhD, RG ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY COMMISSION APPLICATION Prospective Oro Valley Water Commission Members: Thank you for your interest in the water planning and service activities of the Valley Water Utility Commission. The volunteers who are appointed to the Commission will be joining a group of citizens dedicated co assuring a permanent supply of the best quality water available for present and future generations. The Commission and its subcommittees will meet once or twice a month dealing with the basic fundamental issues including those in the checklist below. Please complete this application and return to the Town Clerk's Office. 11000 N. La Canada Drive, Oro Valley, Arizona, 85737-7015. Name Leon ha rt Leo S. Lau Fust Middle Home Address Oro Valley, AZ 85737 Elwine Address 1820 E. River Road, Suite 100, Tucson, AZ 85718 Home Phone gusinpss pion 881-73u0 ext. 101 FAX 529-2141 Number of Years in Om V ley 1 Pima County 16 S /bate 'lease c:iec. the Water Utility Commission activities in which you would be most interested and a short statement of why below the checklist. Water Utility Commission Capital Improvement Program Budget Review and Recommendations Revenue Requirements and Rate Adjustments System Development Water Resource Development Information and Education 3 State & Federal Legislation Regional Water Issues 2 _ I am a practi ci n rofessi onal_h_ydro�eol ogi st with a doctoral e in watershed hydrology from the University of Arizona 1 have lived in Tucson over the past 28 years (although not continuously) and have an active interest i n water resource issues._ wcodmonAmy&96 ORO VALLEY WATER LTILITY CO MISSION APPLICATION 2 Please list other community, civic, professional. social, educational. cultural or athletic organizations you have been affiliated with, length of time, any office held, and any achievement in those organizations you feel are noteworthy. Adjunct Professor, hydrology &Water Resources, Universe of Arizona (since 1991) Adjunct Professor, University of Phoenix (since 1995) of Pima Community Col 1 ege (s=nce 1996) National Ground Water Association (since 1980,E award recipient American Geophysical Union (since 1980) Registered Geologist (Arizona, 1985; Indiana, 1980; California; 1993) Certified N dro. -. OG ' - • 4 .. AP •: Arizona Governor' s Hazardous Waste Technical Advisory Comi ttee Youth soccer and softball coach Arizona Association of Industries (1996) — What do you consider your highest responsibility, skill or achievement: professionally andior personally, and why? This is a command/ complex_ question, but in terms or "responsibility" . I am most serious about my role as a husband and father of four four_childulL All else that I do centers on and follows from that role. This has led me to strive for i ncreasi nal y greater professional responsibility and achievement. VA:ad a_=0pt6.96 � - •trV5- _7 1•1,4?7r,- 3 ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY COMMISSION APPLICATION EMPLOYMENT Please list previous employment. List your last or present employment first: Dates of Employment Company Name &Address 1. 7/92 topjesent„ Hargis+ associates Inc_, 1820 E, River Road Ste_ 100 Tucson t AZ_ 85718 2. 4/91 to s7/92 Voodwa_rd-Clyde ConsuJtantst Tucson,AZ 3. 7/87 to 4/91 Hams+Associates_enc. Tucson,AZ 4. 7/87 to 7/87_ ,ocicwelI/Westinghouse Hanford_Richnaand,WA 5. 1124 to 7/18 U.S. Enyironntentai Prot 'on Agency,Washington D.C. see encl. ed resume for further details List Position&Job Description in numbered order as listed above_ See attached resume '4•4444.44.4. Ab4444444 , ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY COMMISSION APPLICATION 4 EDUCATION Briefly describe your educational background: InstitutionlSchooi Degree Received University of. Arizona, Watershed N drol ogy .PhD 12/8_ • - - - - oureps L • •• • . t . - . - -• .• ss 1q7c1,_ Area of Study in numbered order as listed above: I....Geo l Qa ,Z,,,, Hyd rn J()Day -_ - Ettaineerina 4. Natural Resources AMP Other fields of study, professional institutes, training program. etc.: see resume IF DESIRED, FURTHER INFORMATION MAY BE ATTACHED waodinal.WW6.96 RESUME LEO S. LEONHART, PhD, RG / -_a If—VS-1 J ! LEO S.LEONHART, PhD, RG, CHg,Principal Hydrogeologist SUMMARY OF EXPERIEIVCE _ Professional experience in geology, hydrology, and environmental science since 1974. Professional experience includes technical contributions and management in government, industry, university, and consulting. Technical work includes hydrogeologic investigations,watershed studies, and environmental assessment. Extensive supervision of technical teams of scientists and engineers, university teaching and research. Operations and technical management of consulting firm. EDUCATION • Doctor of Philosophy(PhD)in Watershed/Hydrology,University of Arizona, 1978 • Master of Science(MS)in Natural Resources/Geology,Ohio State University, 1971 • Bachelor of Science(BS)in Geology,Youngstown State University, 1970 PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS& CERTIFICATIONS • Certified Geologist,AIPG, 1980(No.4740);Indiana, 1980(No.225) • Licensed Geologist,No.AA0036,Alaska, 1981 • Registered Geologist,Arizona. 1985(No. 18133);California, 1993(No.5779) • Certified Hydrogeologist,California, 1995(No.350) • UST Consultant,Arizona, 1995(No. 1155) • Special Teaching Certificate,Arizona Community College Board, 1996,(No.43788) PROFESSIONAL POSITIONS 1992-present Principal HydrogeologistfTechnical Director,Hargis+Associates,Inc.,Tucson,AZ 1991-1992 Senior Project Hydrogeologist,Woodward-Clyde Consultants,Tucson,AZ 1987-1991 Associate/Manager Site Assessment Group,Hargis+Associates,Inc.,Tucson,AZ 1985 Research Hydrologist,Arizona Water Resources Research Center,Tucson,AZ 1978-1987 Senior Hydrologisr/Hydrology Mgr_,Rockwell/Westinghouse Hanford,Richland,WA 1976-1978 Research Associate.U. S.EPA/University of Arizona,Tucson,Arizona 1974-1976 Physical Scientist,C.T. S.Environmental Protection Agency,Washington,D.C. 1972-1973 Research Assistant,University of Arizona,Tucson,Arizona 1970-1971 FSA Trainee,Ohio State University,Columbus,Ohio PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS__- • Air&Waste Management Association,Grand Canyon Section, Water Editor • American Geophysical Union • Arizona Geological Society • Arizona Governor's Hazardous Waste Technical Advisory Committee • Association of Groundwater Scientists and Engineers • Pima College,Adjunct Professor • University of Arizona,Adjunct Associate Professor • University of Arizona,Technical Advisory Committee Member • University of Phoenix,Adjunct Professor Dr.Leo S. Leonhart Resume (coned) Page 2 of 9 REFRESENTA TI VE PROFESSIONAL ASSIGNMENTS Dr. Leortart's professional experience comprises an extensive list of projects spanning many facets of the environmental consulting discipline as well as academic research. The following is a List of his key professional assignments in various representative El/ES and RD/RA • Directed and performed investigations supporting CERCLA investigations including remedial RUES, risk assessment, and remedial design investigation for PRP at the Apache Powder Superfund Site Cochise County, Arizona. Work included evaluation of nitrate contamination in alluvial groundwater system adjacent to the San Pedro River, investigation and response action at DNT-contaminated landfill, preparation of baseline risk assessment, preparation of feasibility study, installation of replacement wells for affected residents, siting, design, construction and operation of treatment wetlands for groundwater remediation system,and interface with regulatory agencies and community_ • Provided technical oversight over RI/FS and RD/RA work performed at several other CERCLA sites including the Beckman Instruments Site, Porterville, California; General Dynamics/AFP 4 Site, Fort Worth, Texas; Hughes/AFP 44 Site, Tucson, Arizona; Lockheed site, Burbank, California; Marley Site,Stockton,California;and Montrose Site, Torrance,California. • Provided technical oversight over work performed at state-superfund sites including Beckman Instruments Site, Irvine, California: Caspian Site, El Centro, California; Chatham Site, Escondido, California; Chrome Company WQARF Site, Tucson. Arizona; Hughes Site, El Segundo California; Hughes Site, Fullerton, California; and Hughes Site, Torrance, California, Xerox Site, Irvine, California. • Directed EE/CA, design, and implementation of CERCLA Removal Action for VOC-contaminated shallow groundwater at AFP 44, Tucson, Arizona. Remedial design incorporated dual-phase extraction,conventional extraction,and in situ bioremediation of low hydraulic conductivity strata. Remedial Response Actions Dr. Leonhart has directed work involving remedial response actions involving releases of hazardous materials to the environment. Examples include: • Unexploded Ordnance Survey over trinitrotoluene-contaminated area at Apache Powder Superfund Site,Cochise County,Arizona. • Closure of Open Burn/Open Detonation Unit at Apache Nitrogen Products, Inc. facility, Cochise County,Arizona. • Removal of DNT drums and contaminated soils at the Apache Powder Superfund Site, Cochise County,Arizona. Portions of the work performed under PPE Level B. • Removal of lead contaminated soils at Knight Foundry, Tucson, Arizona. Removal action involved fixation of soils. • Emergency response to spill of concentrated nitric acid at Apache Nitrogen Products, Inc. facility Cochise County,Arizona_ • Soil removal, clean-up verification, and site closure at Chrome Company WQARF site, Tucson, Arizona. • Numerous UST investigations involving release of petroleum products to soils. 07/09/99 Dr.Leo S.Leonhart Resume (coned) Page 3 of 9 RiaLisessment • Managed baseline risk assessment for Apache Powder Superfund Site, Cochise County, Arizona. Assessment included evaluation of exposure pathways related to on-site soil and groundwater contamination. la& • Directed compliance actions required under civil consent decree issued to Apache Nitrogen Products, Inc., Benson. Arizona_ Actions included compliance with RCRA inspections, labeling, training, hazwaste determinations of materials, and closure of treatment and manufacturing facilities. • Directed work supporting preparation of a joint Subtitle D/Aquifer Protection Permit application for Cinder Lake Landfill,Flagstaff,Arizona. Sitinz Studies • Managed and conducted regional hydrogeologic investigations supporting siting of a high-level nuclear waste repository in basalt within the Columbia Plateau region. Investigation performed on behalf of U. S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations under authority of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act. Investigations included exploratory drilling, aquifer testing, piezometry, watershed and flooding evaluations,hydrochemical and isotopic analyses,and modeling. • Performed fatal flaw landfill siting study for City of Nogales,Arizona. • Performed hydrogeologic evaluations supporting landfill siting studies in Maricopa and Pinal Counties,Arizona. Data used in GIS overlay. • Directed siting investigation for artificial treatment wetlands at the Apache Powder Superfund Site, Cochise County,Arizona. forensic Investigations I xpert Wit= • Supervised and supported technical evaluations supporting litigation involving third-party culpability in toxic tort case. Suit alleged adverse health effects from groundwater contamination originating at aerospace manufacturing facility. • Supported technical evaluations involving litigation between PRP and insurers over payment of costs for CERCLA actions at multiple pesticide formulation facilities. • Retained by U. S.Aix Force as expert witness for settlement of claim by contractor for reimbursement of costs for environmental clean-up. • Retained as expert witness by PRP for settlement of claim against insurers for costs for CERCLA actions involving groundwater contamination. • Performed technical analysis supporting opinion on water rights adjudication involving the impact of well use on surface water stream. 07/09199 Dr_Leo S.Leonhart Resume (cont.d) Page 4 of 9 Entronment,_.al1mpact Reviews . • Served as federal agency liaison for U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D. C. Responsibilities included liaison with U. S. Department of the Interior and Tennessee Valley Authority to ensure agency compliance with environmental statutes. • Performed and supervised environmental impact reviews for EPA. Reviews included proposals for federal policies, rulemaking. and proposed federal actions requiring environmental impact statements pursuant to National Environmental Policy Act. Proposed federal actions of assigned agencies included offshore oil and gas leasing,coal and mineral leases, grazing leases,water resources projects, pipeline projects,and other uses of federal Iands. QoD • Performed and directed investigations supporting various components of Installation Restoration Program(IRP)at 12 Government-Owned, Contractor-Operated(GOCO)facilities throughout the U.S. for the U.S.Air Force, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base. • Prepared status summary for federal,state,and local requirements for underground storage tank(IJST) compliance at 12 GOCOs. • Expert witness for contract settlement relating to environmental costs accrued by a contractor. • Project manager for Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis (EF/CA) for evaluation remediation alternatives for perched groundwater zone at USAF Plant No.44,Tucson,Arizona. H . is Asse,s erns&Field!nvestiaatim • Project manager for hydrogeologic study supporting Aquifer Protection Permit (APP)/Subtitle D application for Cinder Lake Landfill near Flagstaff Arizona. • Directed technical investigations supporting APP application for Apache Nitrogen Products, Inc., Cochisc County.Arizona. • Designed and implemented special testing methods for deep, low conductivity basalts. Methods included tracer testing of basalt flow tops, vertical hydraulic conductivity testing using Neuman- Witherspoon methods,and multilevel piezometry. • Directed groundwater modeling studies investigating groundwater flow and transport evaluations at the Apache Powder Superfund site. Cochise County, Arizona; Columbia Plateau and Cold Creek Syncline, Washington: U.S. Air Force Plant 44, Tucson, Arizona; and the Cholla Steam Electric Station,Joseph City,Arizona. • Prepared and directed program for alternate domestic water supply provision to affected households in St. David, Arizona. Program involved plan preparation, public meeting, design and installation of deep wells,wellhead treatment,and monitoring. 07/09199 Dr. Leo S. Lconhart Resume (cant'd) Page 5 of 9 Watertglind Floodinz Studies • Performed surface water inventory/budget study of the Columbia Plateau in support of Basalt Waste Isolation Project. • Performed flood risk evaluations for Reference Repository Location in support of Basalt Waste Isolation Project. • Performed flood risk evaluation in support of Asarco-Santa Cruz in situ mining project. • Performed watershed studies at the Black Mesa and Kayenta mine sites supporting EPA research on mined-land reclamation_ • Supervised program of urban runoff assessment in Tucson, Arizona, for Arizona Water Resources Research Center. • Performed water quality data review and reporting for Gila River Indian Community_ SUPPLEMENTARY TRAINING 1975 Photogrammetry/Remote Sensing,USDA Graduate School,Washington,DC 1978 Project Management,Joint Center for Graduate Studies(JCGS),Richland,WA 1979 System 2000. Immediate Access. 1979,Boeing Computer Services,Richland,WA 1981 Engineering Economy,JCGS,Richland,WA Modeling Pollutant Movement in Groundwater,University of Wisconsin,Madison,WI 1983 Management Principles for Technically-Trained Personnel,JCGS,Richland, WA 1984 Numerical Methods Applied to Flow through Porous Media,JCGS,Richland,WA Finite Element Analysis in Fluids&Hear Transfer,JCGS,Richland,WA 1985 Geosrat:stics Workshop,JCGS,Richland,WA 1986 Applied Groundwater Modeling,International Groundwater Modeling Center,Indianapolis.IN Ground Water Modeling without Advanced Mathematics,Tri-Cities Univ_Ctr.,Richland,WA 1987 Hydrochemical Modeling,Tri-Cities University Center,Richland,WA OSHA 40-Hour Training for Hazardous Waste Workers,Clayton Environmental,Tucson,AZ 1988 Safety at Hazardous Materials Sires,National Water Well Association,Valhalla,NY Expert Witness Short Course,National Ground Water Association,Las Vegas,NV 1989 Regulation/Compliance Underground Storage Tanks,Arizona State University,Tempe,AZ 1991 Project Management.Woodward-Clyde Consultants.Denver,CO Wellhead Protection Programs, 1991,U.S.Environmental Protection Agency,Phoenix,AZ Storm Water Sampling Methods Workshop, 1991,Woodward-Clyde Consultants,Portland,OR 1993 Management Workshop,Performance Systems,Inc.,La Jolla,CA 1994 UST Consultant's Workshop,Arizona Department of Environmental Quality,Phoenix,AZ 07/09/99 Dr.Leo S.Leonhart Resume (cont'd) Page 6 of 9 1995 Faculty Workshop, University of Phoenix,Phoenix,AZ 1996 Wetlands Shancourse,Humboldt State University,Arcata,CA TECHNICAL PUBLICA TIONS/PRESE?TTA TIONS Lconhart, L. S., 1998. "Apache Wetland Project" poster presentation for winning Outstanding Ground Water Remediation Project Award at National Ground Water Association, Annual Convention. December 13, 1998.Las Vegas,Nevada. Leonhart,L.S., 1998. "The Apache Wetlands Project"presented at the Arizona Association of Industries, Environmental Summit. August 14, 1998,Prescott,Arizona. Ross, C_ G_ A., L. S. Leonhart, J. D. Schwall, and D. M. Bresette. 1998. "Design and Operational Contingency for Remediation of a Low Permeability Stratum" poster presentation at The First International Conference on Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Compounds. Battelle. Monterey, California.May 18-21, 1998. Leorthart, L. S., M. C. Coggeshall. and K. E. Nejdl, 1997. ''Source Control at the Apache Powder Superfund Site, Cochise County, Arizona" in Proceedings of HAZWasre/EPAZ 97 Symposium, Environmental Professionals of Arizona annual meeting,Phoenix,Arizona. Leonhart, L. S., M. C. Coggeshall. E. J. Nelson, T. P. Leo, R. A. Gearheart, A. Benner, and K. M. Alter, 1996. "Artificial Wetland Treatment of Nitrate Plume, Apache Powder Superfund Site, Cochise County, Arizona" in Wanted: Water for Rural Arizona. Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Symposium,Arizona Hydrological Society,Prescott,Arizona. Leonhart, L. S.,M. C. Coggeshall, and C. L. Leo, 1995. "Remediation of the DNT Drum Disposal Area, Apache Powder Superfund Site, Benson, Arizona" in Proceedings of HAZWASTE 1995 Symposium. HAZWASTE Society annual meeting,Phoenix,Arizona. Leonhart, L.S. and D. R.Hargis, 1990. "The Hydrogeologic Character of Sedimentary Interbeds in Flood Basalts" in Proceedings of the International Conference on Groundwater in Large Sedimentary Basins, H.Ventriss,editor;Australian Water Resources Council Conference Series No.20,July 9- 13, 1990. Perth,Australia. Nevulis,R D. Wolford,D. Davis,S. Sorooshian,and L. S. Leonhart, 1986. "Statistical Tools for Aquifer Conceptualization"abstract in EOS: American Geophysical Union(full paper published as RHO- BW-SA-634A,Rockwell Hanford Operations,Richland,WA). Leonhart,L.S., P.C. Frankel,and M.C.Hagood, 1986. "Structural Segregation of Sub-Basins within the Columbia Plateau Regional Aquifer"abstract in EOS, American Geophysical Union(full paper published as RHO-B W-SA-633A,Rockwell Hanford Operations,Richland,WA). Leonhart, L. S. and K. M. Thompson, 1985. "The Role of Piezometric Baseline Data in Hydrologic Characterization"abstract in LOS 66(46)887, American Geophysical Union. Lconhart, L. S., R. L. Jackson, D. L. Graham, L. W. Gelhar. G. M. Thompson, C. R. Wilson, and B. Y. Kanehiro, 1985. "Analysis and Interpretation of a Recirculating Tracer Experiment Performed on a Deep Basalt Flow Top" in Bulletin, Association of Engineering Geologists, XXII(3)259-274 (paper also published as RHO-BWI-SA-3 00P,Rockwell Hanford Operations,Richland,WA). Rogers, P.M., L.S. Leonhart,A.H. Lu,and S. M. Baker, 1985. "Strategy and Sequencing of Hydrologic Characterization of the Columbia River Basalts" abstract in Memoirs of the International 07/09/99 '.tn�_i ' 1 �C7_n Dr.Lco S. Leonhart Resume (cant'd) Page 7 of 9 Association of Hydrogeologists,XVII(also published as RHO-13WI-SA-320P,Rockwell Hanford Operations.Richland,WA). Loo, W. W., R. C. Amen, L. S. Leonhart, S. P. Luttrell, I. S. Wang, and W. R. McSpadden, 1984. Effective Porosities of Basalt: A Technical Basis for Values and Probability Distributions Used in Preliminary Performance Assessments_ RHO-BW-TI-254, Rockwell Hanford Operations, Richland, WA. Leonhart, L. S. and G. E. Wukelic, 1983. Monitoring Land and Water Uses in the Columbia Plateau Using Remote-Sensing Computer Analysis and Integration Techniques. Presented at CEP.MA International Conference on Resource Management Applications, Energy and the Environment, San Francisco, CA (also published as RHO-BW-SA-307P, Rockwell Hanford Operations, Richland,WA). Leonhart, L. S., R. L. Jackson, D. L. Graham, G. M. Thompson, and L. W. Gelhar, 1982. "Field Tracer Experiment for Determining Groundwater Flow and Transport Characteristics of Flood Basalts". Abstract in Proceedings of the Pacific Northwest Regional Meeting of the American Geophysical Union/Alaska Science Conference, Fairbanks, Alaska (also published as RHO-BWI-SA-220P, Rockwell Hanford Operations,Richland,WA). Cole, C. R.,H. P. Foote, G. W. Wukelic, S. C. Blair. and L. S. Leonhart, 1981. "Integration of a Digital Data for Regional Hydrologic Modeling" in Proceedings of the Joint Automatic Control Conference,Charlottesville,Virginia. Leonhart, I.,. S., F. A. DeLuca, S. N. Sheahan, and L. M. West. 1981. "Devising a Groundwater Monitoring Strategy for a Geologic Repository for Radioactive" Ground Water Monitoring Review(2)1. Schalla, R. and L. S. Leonhart, 1981. "Dealing with Regional Hydrologic Data Base Limitations and Uncertainties" in Proceedings of the Symposium on the Uncertainties Associated with the Regulation of High-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal in Geologic Media,Gatlinburg,TN. Bell,N.M. and Leonhart, 1980. A ,Preliminary Evaluation of Water-Resource Development and Poten-tial within the Pasco Basin,RHO-BWI-LrD-33,Rockwell Hanford Operations,Richland,WA. Leonhart, L. S., 1980. Assessment of the Effects of Existing Major Dams on a Radioactive Waste Reposi- tory within the Hanford Site,RHO-BWI-LD-26,Rockwell Hanford Operations,Richland,WA. Leonhart, L. S., 1980. "Evaluation of Artificial Recharge and Discharge via Remote Sensing" abstract in LOS,American Geophysical Unions,presented at annual meeting,Toronto.ON. Leonhart, L. S. and J. G. Stephan, 1980. "LANDSAT Data as a Basis for Regional Environmental Assessment within the Columbia Plateau" in Proceedings of the eh Canadian Symposium on Remote Sensing,Halifax,NS. Gephart, R. E., F. A. Spane, Jr., L. S. Leonhart, D_ A_ Palombo, and S. R. Strait, 1979. "Pasco Basin Hydrology" in Hydrologic Studies within the Columbia Plateau. Washington, RHO-BWI-ST-5, Rockwell Hanford Operations,Richland,WA. Leonhart, L. S. and F. A. Spane, Jr., 1979. "Regional Hydrology" in Hydrologic Studies within the Columbia Plateau. Washington,RHO-BWI-ST-S,Rockwell Hanford Operations,Richland,WA. Leonhart, L. S., 1979. Surface Hydrologic Investigations of the Columbia Plateau Region, Washington, RHO-BWI-ST 6.Rockwell Hanford Operations,Richland,WA. Leonhart, L. S., I979. Remote Sensing of Ii Situ Oxidation, presented at Association of Exploration Geochemists annual meeting,Tucson,AZ. 07109/99 , I r`G` `I ___C7.._^ Dr.Leo S.Leonhart Resume (coned) Page 8 of 9 Leonhart, L. S., 1978. An Analysis of Combustion within Surface Mine Spoils and of Its Consequent Effects on Reclamation and the Environment. Doctor's Thesis, School of Renewable Natural Resources,University of Arizona,Tucson,AZ. Leonhart,L.S., 1978. "Physical Processes Related to Impact Prcdiction of Land Disturbance Activities"in Proceedings of the International Congress on Energy and the Ecosystem,Grand Forks,ND. Kempf, J., L. S. Leonhart, M. M. Fogel, and L. Duckstcin, 1978. Water Quality Runoff from Surface- Mined Lands in Arizona, presented at the American Water Resources Association's Arizona Section/Arizona Academy of Sciences'Hydrology Section annual meeting,flagstaff,AZ. Leonhart, L. S., 1975. The EIS and Offshore Geology, invited paper to the American Association of Petroleum Geologists,Western Section Workshop in Environmental Geology,Long Beach,CA. Everett, L. G. and L. S. Leonhart, 1973. "An Evaluation of ERTS-1 Imagery in Reservoir Dynamics"in Proceedings of the 4''Annual Symposium on Remote Sensing of Arid Lands,Office of Arid Lands Studies, ACADEMIC POSITIONS 1991-present Adjunct Associate Professor, University of Arizona, Department of Hydrology &Water Resources 1995-present Adjunct Professor,University of Phoenix,General Studies 1996-present Adjunct Professor, Pima College, Arizona State Environmental Technology Training Center(ASETT) TEACHING ASSIGNMENTS 1999 People, Science, and the Environment(SCI 256) University of Phoenix — Overview of environmental science in relation to human issues(3 c.u.). 1999 Environmental Issues and Ethics (SCI 362) University of Phoenix — Historic, current, and future environmental issues from an interdisciplinary philosophical perspective by applying scientific,philosophical,economic,and ethical principles(3 c_u.). 1999 Environmental Hydrology(HWR 450/550)University of Arizona. Guest Lecturer. 1998 Field Hydrology (HWR 414/514) University of Arizona — Field methods of collection compilation and interpretation of data in surface water (1 field). 1996-98 Environmental Science (SCI 480/SCI 360) University of Phoenix — Application of fundamental concepts of air and water pollution, solid and hazardous wastes, radiation, occupational safety&health,and environmental law in the business organization(3 c.u.). 1996 Hydrogeology and Groundwater Pollution Technology (ENV 210) Pima College — Principles of hydrogeology and overview of groundwater pollution and remediation for environmental technology majors(3 s.h.,3 Iec, I lab). 1993-96 IIWR Thesis Practicurn (HWR 696), University of Arizona, Department of Hydrology& Water Resources — Sponsored regional hydrogeologic investigation by interdisciplinary team of graduate students in HWR. Study areas include Cicnega Creek and Patagonia groundwater basins in southern Arizona. Thesis research includes groundwater modeling, gravity/geophysical surveys, hydrochemical modeling, surface water 07/09/99 `Jf1}i-� i•1--�Ff�l= AFF _��_� Dr.Leo S.Leonharr Resume (cont'd) Page 9 of 9 modeling, evapotranspiration/energy balance, hydrologic budget, and resource management. 1992-1993 Introduction to iivdrogeology, Hargis + Associates, Inc. — to-house technical training course for consulting geologists and engineers(14 lesson correspondence curriculum). 1991-1994 Hydrageology (HWR 431/531 and GELS 431/531) -- Hydrologic and geologic factors controlling the occurrence and dynamics of groundwater on regional and local scales. Field and laboratory methods in hydrogeology. Field trips. (4 s.h.,3 lec., 1 lab) THESIS COMMI Z7EES As an Adjunct Associate Professor of Hydrology & Water Resources at the University of Arizona, Dr. Leonhart has been a committee member and thesis reader/examiner for several candidates for the Master of Science degree. Goodman. B. S. (1992) 1-fydrogeology of the Quitobaquito Springs Area, La Abra Plain and the Rio Sonoyra Valley. Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument, Arizona and Sonora, Mexico (with M. Sully and L.G.Wilson) Gutierrez-Ojeda, C. (1994) Origin of Arsenic in the Alluvial Aquifer of the Region Lagunera, States of Coahuilla and Durango. Mexico(with R.L.Bassett and L.G.Wilson). Ellet, W. J. (1994) Geologic Controls on the Occurrence and Movement of Water in the Lower Cienega Creek Basin(with L.G.Wilson,T.Maddock,and M.Gettings) Chong-Diaz, D. (1995) Modeling of Stream Aquifer Interaction in Lower Cienega Creek Basin Using a Finite Element Technique(with T.Maddock and L.G.Wilson) Grahn, H. (1995) Hydrochemical Characterization of the Cienega Creek Riparian Area. Pima County, Arizona(with M.Conklin and R.L.Bassett) Roudebush, E. M. (1996) The Influence of Bedrock on Perennial Stream,flow in the Upper Cienega Creek Basin, Pima County, Arizona Evaluation of Upper Cienega Creek Basin (with L. G. Wilson, M. Zreda,and M.Gettings) Huth, H. (1996) I-Ivdrogeochemical Modeling of Western Mountain Front Recharge in Upper Cienega Creek Sub-Basin.Pima County,Arizona(with M.Conklin and L.G. Wilson) Soul,L.(1996)Modeling of Stream Aquifer Interaction in Upper Cienega Creek Basin Using MODFLOW (with T.Maddock and L.G.Wilson) Schieffer,J.H.(1998)Storage and Recovery Potential of a Fractured Rock Aquifer at the Arizona Sonora Aquifer(with C.Glass and M_Poulton)Thesis submitted to Department of Mining and Geological Engineering. 07/09199 1 rt - • r 7 • Town of Oro Valley July 12,1999 Mayor Paul Loomis David Hook Utility Director Re: Water Utility Commission Vacancies As of June 3-0th 19.93, I, John M. Dohogne, have- served for three years on the Oro Valley Water Commission, thus ending my term of service. After much consideration, I will continue to serve on this commission as long as needed at this time. If someone else from my area is qualified and desires to serve on the commission, I will step aside, for I believe in term limits, and allowing the chance for all citizens to serve. I look forward again to serving the community and doing what 1 can to make it a better place to live. Thank you for asking me co serve again. Sincerely, John. K. Dohogme_ J 133-••`'`• 0):: 3 '• :::::: oo a) a) ::C-- :c----C.-1 ::::::: 5 .:-.13, :;,.... i.:f....f.:: :t.-:.-..:- Q •_ 1. •_ ._ •_ •_ •— -:Er).-:v •U). . --: 6 I- 0 0 0 V v 0 0 -:D:•:W : :::D :433':':--.• o CO < < < < < < < --.(4.-:;4: c4:-.h•~. 17!7',..•-•:•:- 6 •-•-•._ ••• ••• •-••--- C Z .. ... ... ••: ... •• C) O at r' r' N N .. . ... : c,_ i c-).... • W X - o 0 o o 0 0 :O-Q 0::tom.Q :: I- W M M M M el :ch.:E'.3 )::c') cY) -:.. ... ... ... . ....... ... ... ....... ad i k,..,. L. 1.5. >, 15, :-ii.,:ii::.‘...-. :!j.:i.:$4.:....-'4...;:::::::: i0 C‘) CI C4) :*.i!'d.-.iSi..6::;t1 ;.".6t:.:.:.:. 44 ct z • ii :is :::.........:::::-• ..,:-......:::::. ------ W 1111111 �= to :ti) :.tl� :1-0'..-.. :-: •V):,:-:- -.- a. 4 ,.„... .......... a` ' c4 . - 0 c''. 3 • ... ... .... i'lli •0 -8 -..- ... .--. -.-.. .. ...... ... ............. ...........• .....- ....... ... ... ... ..q . ....... ... ... ... ........ . ... ... ... ...• ...... _... ... .0 • -6 ›* u • • •,.•• Vr W i . . g 15 2- ii4:::'4i. :0:-I '---- . ‘.. . : a V . 1" 6 , jiil:itr?I? Pli"... .4. 4' 0 tim,..„,firj co a° 0 Adfl g.:.°021 ECNt47.. A. o11111111ppopippli F O r' � Q •�► L6 co vi- Cs1 _ _F._ a� >" .ga lloi pi!. „, a) 3 0 0 0 sr, 0 L z ._ •E '. Eh Lci 2 - Ei2 2 W cy _ r.• _ _. ca. ori _; > c . -i }+ • • cn cn cn cn a) = cn :-.- 41, § ... 1- M is co - co co co co co N o cis Z —1 u —i V) it •V) E :,_.E: ,;,,1:::�.;� -�,�:-:-:-: _ ceceOC ecce0 (n fx 0 .;.+ 0 �.+ a) = a) O .=:::0 ::+; >-::-:- I# ii Ei H ii iI iU ii H H o QOCQOCI- gCo :Q.:Q. <:.4 .��: -.. :- (NI coNJ- inco co a) az , .... - Z L. C C.12 W 'IC (n _ .= O 7 6:... . ''�--...- ---. .......• T....'♦ IC vz s w 0 --) -' ...i ..C �: - - •-.ca: V, a W 0 0 w ) w :. =: :O•Q ii O2 � N " °' v = a) 0 IMINM C936. Z 12”. ec CO Ca .....":5 >:.`7',... :r)::::-:. cn :- O O ::0::••••• . .0 ce 2o > t u) CI -J :Q.:O.I-:r H •: EXHIBIT 3 Proposed revisions to Article 15-4 of the Town Code Modify Section 15-4-3 as follows: 15-4-3 Membership Composition, Terms and Qualifications The Oro Valley Water Utility Commission (Commission) shall be composed of no less than five and no more than seven members. Insofar as is possible, a . olnetheers one shall be a-technically qualified residential customer from the area served by the Town of Oro Valley Water System wi aeurren�: � n� :4—"ounanTe7 area, one of • . - - •• - --- - - - a ea—t eem6E7 shall be a technically qualified residential customer representing the largest service area of the Town of Oro Valley Water System outside of the Town boundaries, one of which shall mit eAen commercial customers and � e.' . �:�. ._� • . wc. , iossiolokeiii"---entdtiv ,',o turf interests. Should t-we additional members be appointed causing the Commission to be composed of seven members, insofar as possible, they shall be technically qualified and _ _ __ __ _ _ _.•_ _ '_ ___ _ _' 't _ ! • xit �fl j r ent icer' �� eiftlp,AVAItit§1.W*fiWiettlis ?�.. ..> , . K:t� 4 411 ' • en •r .. r.o o;; as . " �` � ' . Members of the Commission shall be appointed by the Town Council, having completed an application on a form supplied by the Town, a subsequent interview and having been recommended by the Town Manager. The Commission members shall serve terms of three (3) years, which terms shall be staggered. An initial five member Commission shall draw lots to determine which two members shall have an initial term of three (3) years, and which two members shall have an initial term of two (2) years. One member shall initially serve a term of one (1) year. An initial seven member Commission shall draw lots to determine which three members shall have an initial term of three (3) years and which two members shall have a term of two (2) years. Two members shall initially serve a term of one (1) year. Thereafter members shall serve for terms of three (3) years. All members are limited to a maximum of two (2) successive terms. C:\WTRC.Comm\Membership.Composition.11.24.97 ..- [..... TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 3 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: September 1, 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: David L. Andrews, Finance Director SUBJECT: Consideration and Possible Approval of Appointments to the Budget and Bond Committee SUMMARY: On June 2, 1999 the Town Council approved the formation of the Budget and Bond Committee. The Town Clerk advertised to fill the five positions for the Committee and received a total of seven applications. Councilmember La Sala and the Finance Director interviewed the candidates and are pleased to offer the following recommendations for Council approval: Mr. Louis Dudas Mr. Jack Longley Mr. Mark Neihart Mr. Barton Rochman Mr. Vito Tedeschi ATTACHMENTS: 1. Applications and related materials for all applicants SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to approve the recommended appointments to the Town of Oro Valley Budget and Bond Committee. or I move to . . . .21-,2.___d,....,,,,..4,u..._ David L. Andrews Finance Director / /// .. //L,_/ •ck weet ' r Town Manager OHO Os `1- 41'.4".".11 . ;Ili. Calf' Af_1711 r _ (Qadtikd . ORO VALLEY BOARD/COMMISSION APPLICATION Dear Oro Valley Citizen: We appreciate your interest in the Town of Oro Valley. Enclosed is an informational form which when completed will allow us to quickly process your application. While the information asked for is optional. your supplying the information will greatly assist in an understanding of education. experience and background to allow the best possible use of your talents which you are so kindly willing to provide to the Town of Oro Valley and for which we thank you. Please return to the Town Clerk's Office. 11.000 N. La Canada Drive, Oro Valley, Arizona 85737-7015. Name DuD4S OUiS Last First Middle _ Home Address / Business Address Home Phone _ Business Phone Number of Years in Oro Valley —7// Signature Date Please state which boardlcommission you wish to 'oin and why. #7, • 'Ar Please list other community, civic, professional. social, educational. cultural or athletic organizations you have been affiliated with, length of time. any office held. and any achievements in those organizations you feel are noteworthy. /04-AfER6A/0 C4& & CiEi y— / 1//VO/$- D/ -- ?R � g2 ° ,9- 406 114. �fZ c_ i �'!e�/lJ E ge r � m H ALS D • C PE/L) / SC.), (2,Z) What do you consider your highest responsibility, skill or achievement: professionally and/or personally, and why. EMPLOYMENT Please list previous employment. List your past or present employment first: Dates of Employment Company Name & Address 1. /Pc3i— e-/: L(g OW Pe.)5re f&S At, 1_19eq - /° - A.) go t..t.c mic ateeie j 3. SSE iV 4' __AkC74161et iL 4. 5. (List Position & Job Description in numbered order as listed above) g P F AI* ECA.72-P AitE 44 E'E-A. p?9-4-&-koar Y PC,r�.ST1 tJ�si --S T. PL i OMAR 1,?Pr /t4 ti1�-L.i,4� ,p-u.9 r7T3 7A4L-E . STK_ EDUCATION Briefly describe your educational background: Institution/School Degree Received 2. UN'V02--f)/ 77i tc)F Cc4 Cel+e-C) 1111,gt6r 1 4. 5. Area of Study in numbered order as listed above: 1� 4C-00 v Arr, 1\?6 ff)( Lc) sr? Other fields of study, professional institutes. training program, etc: bio ' W F ,D ,e EC:7-0/e_ 10e;er -- /z.• `7e<' /' AY- ,1*-- i / i L. i► /'moi U -- �,53 /NIP- R__AL.3m4 IF DESIRED. FURTHER INFORMATION MAY BE ATTACHED D OC1A P P FO RM.KEC110/96 hece Lveo J un-23-99 08:45am f r Jack W. Longley le page 1 g Y Certified Public Accountant ) 08:54 V er494, �,v o 520/297-1210 :%\,kW:Anti e '' la ONGLE FAX 520/797-6790 ♦ Tax&Business Services.Ltd Vi........... -• , 70. 7225 N. Oracle Rd. Suite 105 Tucson,Arizona 85704 ORO VALLEY BOARD/COMMISSION APPLICATION - _-• __ __ Dear Ore Valley Citizen: We appreciate your interest in the Town of Oro form which Valley. Enclosed is an informational fo mp feted willY loch when completed allow us to quickly process your application. While the information asked for is optional, your supplying the information will greatly assist 3i in an understanding of education, experience and background to allow the bestpossible use of your talents which you are so kindlywiI • willing to provide to the Town of Oro Valley and for which we thank you. Please return to the Town Clerk's Office, 11,000 N. La Canada Drive, Oro Valley, Arizona 85737-7013. Name -- ��,� (Ai • Last First Middle Home Address / Business Address 7,2,2-5- 4/'t OQ i4 e Le- S✓,` ,4 d 'r..-- Home Phone Business Phone a 9' 7- /o? /.0 Number of Years in Oro Valley •Sh7 6,4/L....2. , A,,,,,,,:z_L- ______ r'e � /, vc s R /- a hove k e/c/rr is .S' c 71- /Y, Y ) al oP , 4 1%pt f& ________,L_____a —21.%7 -.....12_______/. •ignature Date Please state which board/commission you wish to join and why. a il 6-er, i. A 0 ED A,—"--------:—:-7--e---- i ----.77.--07 — e ,`e vc _7"- C,F fr? r, I x_ ,' ,.,,7 c_,,,';), I _ a t/n!gy 74- if2Vc/. .L. ....t.t....._. i Please list other community, civic, professional, social, educational, cultural or athletic organizations you have been affiliated with, length of time. anyoffice held,and anyachievements in in those organizations you feel are noteworthy. i 9 I1VkoUUI 111Y%d UI r LUL E./aya F-367 T-202 P-002 JUN 23 '99 0S:55 0 What do you consider your highest responsibility, skill or achievement; professionally andlor personally, and why. IMMENNIft EMPLOYMENT Please list previous employment. List your past or present employment first: Dates of Employment Company Name & Address s_c —Cry:. LTD 2. -., 77- - v G f' 6-/Z,C L L / 5. (List Position & Job Description in numbered order as listed above) _S 076,17 / , UP4V , r e( - /L % // a/` VEM EDUCATION Briefly describe your educational background: Institution/School Degree Received ••• �•••+ v�./ 1VVVV1‘I li\V VI I .1..VL }•�QyG v F-367 7-202 P-003 JW 23 '99 03:55 v � (.9; SA- (911; ✓crc, 7 4. 5. Area of Study in numbered order as listed above: Gnt'/7 H/l l C t Other fields of study, professional institutes, training program. etc: a, /,`c 14 zo.ti E. }A IF DESIRED, FURTHER INFORMATION MAY BE ATTACHED 3 oOOAPPFORM.KE010r96 JP_.EY Ae�, -- _F:__'-_ &tj /ce`,` YV .., r j..,•,,. x`7:'.!!!7• SA'NI .°`u''. -;F;�'/.•-.,{ 'J - A ) ! � vi + +1,1. ►:i±�•~1 w. •�OA `A ittilY��i'hr.+earl•\/�-�r'*. DED -737. VS;77 ,4:7viT71 ,L04,tWi ORO VALLEY BOARD/COMMISSION APPLICATION Dear Oro Valley Citizen: We appreciate your interest in the Town of Oro Valley. Enclosed is an informational form which when completed will allow us to quickly process your application. While the information asked for is optional, your supplying the information will greatly assist in an understanding of education, experience and background to allow the best possible use of your talents which you are so kindly willing top rovide to the Town of Oro Valley and for which we thank you. Please return to the Town Clerk's Office, 11,000 N. La Canada Drive, Oro Valley, Arizona 85737-7015. Name NE/HAI/41a- 4 Last First Middle Home Address // Business Address — 8927q/- 4/3d7/7 Home PhoneBusiness Phone Number of Years in Oro Valley airy< . f _. .k• vet' /4) / Signature Date Please st. e whic. bo. dlcommission you wish o j oin d why. 4.44s/e, ..ate I �' j I _' AI 17 • j i;k iI:ALS `L CD7s i#C04.4e av' j✓ 4?4,$L MIN w!/AL Please list other community, civic, professional, social, educational, cultural or athletic organizations you have been affiliated with, length of time, any office held, and any achievements in those organizations you feel are noteworthy. 0 What do you consider your highest responsibility, skill or achievement: professionally and/or personally, and why. fi lhose S ilsts.640.1 - ;n4deifee or! ni , sMITAIIEMInall=ir-- .640. 47111. 11177 , tel/ /. ... ri i:l7.1117177L W;. I AtlEAM • is; eY O*1 At.7531,101 I g , a afdimi cioidreff.6" /e.sith7 ep/ism EMPLOYMENT Please list previous employment. List your past or present employment first: Dates of Employment Company Name & Address 1. j, , o,1 2. d/7/‘. 3. Div✓4. Aiwr ye4-0, a 5. !ffif, arm ezedie. Cfi P Ateferiees, (List Position & Job Description in numbered order as listed above) - 45:5/00n roc4oreoperiA _ Z F VL��Mer s•Sfos+ rwrt esi Aida 34e A 4t S r r MIITVIEFIJE ert_e_pikth'iou EDUCATION Briefly describe your educational background: Institution/School Degree Received 1. OnV&SNY 04/ / � 5.,4 . � layeAdv7y_ 0%.51-A1.€ veise .S. � .s:,ess 4. 5. Area of Study in numbered order as listed above: iihme›,e- ---6,w5;17 fri, �owrSts— "'WS.> le Ail,w.nK /�tar�.�+f,��r, a- Other fields of study, professional institutes, training program. etc: IF DESIRED, FURTHER INFORMATION MAY BE ATTACHED 3 DOCvk P P FO RM.KEC110/96 __ gerawm_act: AM9 W00,4S1 ":%Fawl aateaCa Ti*PT%UM LliA2-i7S 0 o, ‘116-tri Pi • • „-v 4 A--071r11.117,1 ORO VALLEY BOARD/COMMISSION APPLICATION Dear Oro Valley Citizen: We appreciate your interest in the Town of Oro Valley. Enclosed is an informational form which when completed will allow us to quickly process your application. While the information asked for is optional, your supplying the information will greatly assist in an understanding of education, experience and background to allow the best possible use of your talents which you are so kindly willing to provide to the Town of Oro Valley and for which we thank you. Please return to the Town Clerk's Office, 11,000 North La Canada Drive, Oro Valley, Arizona 85737-7015. Name fIC f ./� thli All Last First Middle Home Address ' - Business Address `- r4- Home Phone ` Business Phone Number of Years in Oro Valley phi_ lttte A A,eilta its 1444 Signature Date Ple, e state whic board/commission you wish to join and why. - .4 A ' ag 'i. I 14A.1-4 )11 ; , 3 ' 1 4 ‘11 A il/Y, -4Q-444,1- zuwi A 1 • IMINWRIIINSIMINU, A A A , • Ard.41i\c/ iik 4 , Please 1other community, civic, professional, social, educational, cultural or athletic organizations you have been affiliated with, length of time, any office held, and any achievements in those organizations ou feel are noteworthy. • • it • At / " G . " /� i � 'i• - ._ At # J� �. ." C4 • 14 ) *Tay,pa. vetr-d,ikr411121, cf 7:nti,q3 haad 114-mitv ,� to What do you consider your highest responsibility, skill or achievement; professionally and/or personally, and why. /111 loy,ti e)V CZ t fir Avy EMPLOYMENT Please list previous employment. List your past or present em t�o ent first: 4 rt'Y ill 4r y Dates of Employment Company Name&Address 1. 4 I A 2-14°' s 7 - )4r7 2. 3. 4. 5. (List Position&Job Description in n .ered order as listed above) • /1 • JA .1 ztarrazosirotwzmilicsamwspew z 11.._. r►fU'1Ljii�;/�'l41� .nthIjt1.v� 11.4,r�. . L1;11r,441 EDUCATION Briefly describe your educational background: Institution/School Degree Received 1. �/�. . ' / As I' 2. 3. 4. 5. Area of Study in numbered order as listed above: LL fiX4 Other fields of study,professional institutes,training program, etc: /4-4 Avoiny '5' . - 1it M7 IF DESIRED, FURTHER INFORMATION MAY BE ATTACHED 3 p.,LEY a 014, ezp � � O 40? ; ` yi�t'� ,r'�e�=R�;s ti p?'+ ;1 1�Y::�17 t s:cfs~ �r.'r�, -(iNDED 31 yQ, t (.17-7 4t-L`kCi ORO VALLEY BOARD/COMMISSION APPLICATION Dear Oro Valley Citizen: We appreciate your interest in the Town of Oro Valley. Enclosed is an informational form which when completed will allow us to quickly process your application. While the information asked for is optional, your supplying the information will greatly assist in an understanding of education, experience and background to allow the best possible use of your talents which you are so kindly willing to provide to the Town of Oro Valley and for which we thank you. Please return to the Town Clerk's Office, 11,000 N. La Canada Drive, Oro Valley, Arizona 85737-7015. Name Tedeschi Vito ,Tames Last First Middle Home Address s.. _ - : 7 7 Business Address 4701 N. La Cholla Blvd. , Tucson, AZ 85705 Home Phone ( Business Phone (520) 887-1010 Number of Years in Oro Valley 1 1/2 Years 6-16-99 Signat -e Date Please state which board/commission you wish to join and why. Finance/Board Commission - 20 Years experience in qoyernm nta fi nanc.e ar,1 would like to assist town if needed. Please list other community, civic, professional, social, educational, cultural or athletic organizations you have been affiliated with, length of time, any office held, and any achievements in those organizations you feel are noteworthy. Mohave Coun Fair and Racin• Corrmi ss i• - Y-- - _•- - - • •• 0 Municipal Treasures Assoc- Certification Committee_ Pima County Finance Officers Assoc.- 2 Years - President uncinr / Lake Havasu City Finance Committee city of Surprise Bond Committee- 2 Years Az State Unified Audit Committee--10 Years What do you consider your highest responsibility, skill or achievement; professionally and/or personally, and why. Obtained Masters of Business Administration frau AZ State University Jan_ 1g48 Went ba , . •.. . - - T • Took 3 1/2 years attending school after work. EMPLOYMENT Please list previous employment. List your past or present employment first: fiJOflfU3T Fths — f-f-'cF Ft MINC.III— G PFYL Dates of mployment Company Name & Address I01.151c37 6 P4 sei T' 4ioi /J. Clot . �g inkesvi, g57U '� a 1. PLEASE SEE ATTACHED RESUME 2. 3. 4. 5. (List Position & Job Description in n mbered order as listed above) 1 i I EDUCATION Briefly describe your educational ba kground: InstitutionlSchool Degree Received 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Area of Study in numbered order as listed above: fI I ' Other fields of study, professional institutes, training program. etc: IF DESIRED, FURTHER INFORMATION MAY BE ATTACHED 3 DOOAPPFORM.KEC\1 O/96 SHORT FORM RESUME OF: Vito Tedeschi, M.B.A., C.G.F.M., C.M.F.A. Oro Valley, AZ 85737 ( EMPLOYMENT RECORD October 25, 1997- Northwest Fire/Rescue District, 4701 N. La Cholla Present Blvd., Tucson, AZ 85705 Population Served: 110,000 (520)0887-1010 *serve as Chief Financial Officer April 10, 1991 - City of Surprise, 12425 W. Bell Rd., Surprise, AZ 85374 September 10, 1997 Population : 20,000 (602) 583-1000 *served as Asst. City Manager for Finance & Mgmt. May 10, 1982- City of Lake Havasu,1795 Civic Center,Lake Havasu,AZ86403 July 20,1988 Population: 30,000 (602) 453-4147 *served as Management Services Director Se i tember 15 1977 - Ci of Peoria 8401 W. Monroe Av• Peoria AZ April 30, 1982 85345 Population : 23,000 (602) 412-7150 *served as Finance Director/Assistant City Manager March 1, 1972 - Arizona Auditor Generals Office, 2910 N. 44th St., Phx., Az. September14, 1977 85018 *served as Senior Financial Advisor Short Form Resume- Page 2 EDUCATION 1968 - 1972 Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281 Bachelor of Science Degree-Major in Accounting Minor in Data Processing 1994 - 1998 Masters of Business Administration PERSONAL Born: 1950, in Chicago, Illinois Married: August 16, 1969; 1 son (25), 1 daughter(23) Health: Excellent Finances: Good Order; buying home. Affiliations: a International City Managers Association Arizona Municipal Management Assistants Association Municipal Treasurers Association Arizona Finance Officers Association Arizona Horsemen's Association Arizona Fire District Association Hobbies: Golf and sports in general Certifications: Certified Government Financial Manager Certified Municipal Financial Administrator 3 `./ O`r^i� ,i,r.r•S'+•s.-a/ 1/ �•S °•.•.;:a' )0bJ(!; 1 .,,WW4C: )4; J�v, - _ � ... )07 V� e `al,. ,jam��. �.� 61k-tti •� � —uND, ORO VALLEY BOARD/COMMISSION APPLICATION Dear Oro Valley Citizen: We appreciate your interest in the Town of Oro Valley. Enclosed is an informational form which when completed will allow us to quickly process your application. While the information asked for is optional, your supplying the information will greatly assist in an understanding of education, experience and background to allow the best possible use of your talents which you are so kindly willing to provide to the Town of Oro Valley and for which we thank you. Please return to the Town Clerk's Office, 11,000 North La Canada Drive, Oro Valley, Arizona 85737-7015. Name SO X Ale ,r Last First Middle Home Address , ve 0 z,t g s—93 7 Business Address Home Phone Business Phone Number of ears in Oro Valley 9 / 9 - Date J rf Please state which board/commission you wish to join and why. +•� z �' B rJ Con\n\ i—re . V CJX ' A IV I& S . c Q R61 , P' aN n) t OY a2 3 O\/12 S, 6 Q._A p.4Q r t c,d s�`tc- _ Please list other community, civic, professional, social, educational, cultural or athletic organizations you have been affiliated with, length of time, any office held, and any achievements in those organizations you feel are noteworthy. See , 3 0 , -t- cPie S' Gi'nn ;44.70 o D Sci m r •e - uN ikJ ,p C, I c,4 G v SC-10 Q c 5 O C I A-L Sen J 1 C Q rn n1 . ?Q. ri,N nl E-6 r m N --r- ni! r Tr?Pk-T/ What do you consider your highest responsibility, skill or achievement; professionally and/or personally, and why. LA-57 Zrn e eti 7 EX 19 4 ( e ti c - See e S‘-;,n ems, EMPLOYMENT Please list previous employment. List your past or present employment first: SQ Dates of Employment Company Name&Address 1. See em 2. 3. 4. 5. (List Position&Job Description in numbered order as listed above) —e s.�.•, e". EDUCATION Briefly describe your educational background: Institution/School Degree Received 1. See Pe _ i e 2. 3. 4. 5. Area of Study in numbered order as listed above: SQ Q_ 2 .2 sm (p� L . Other fields of study, professional institutes,training program, etc: �}--t-r-e D Q,D n/q ,rl J2/2,v u s kl o te,r; SA v Jn S c' sT\ ry E Q-42- i:b 0n/AJ 4 f r-Q fi-rt-1 i'- 1114 A1 A_6'e in A T 134 0 6•z T 4- 1/S e 14. .I R p ,71 ry i EJ Pe 2,S'on/N �. � J S i R r1/ ft/N D iV A N ;f-0V 7"S .a1 n•!� .S" j� 1 .i'r'e - —. IF DESIRED,FURTHER INFORMATION MAY BE ATTACHED u 1 I J+ 1 3 HENRY SUOZZI Tucson, Arizona 85737 ( EDUCATION Bergen College, New Jersey, 1948-1950. University of Southern California, B.S. in Public Administration, 1951. University of Connecticut, School of Social Work, 1954-56, degree M.S.W. EXP ER I ENCE Nov. 1971-June 1990 COUNSELING AND FAMILY SERVICE, PEORIA, ILLINOIS (Retired) Executive Director: Provide overall leadership,management and administration of one of the larger multi-function, not for profit family service/child welfare agencies in the state. Major responsibilities include: (1) program innovation, planning and development; (2) leadership to Board of Directors, its committees and staff In development of goals and objectives, practices and procedures; (3) fiscal management and accountability including budget development and implementation; (4) innovative techniques and funding development through local,state and federal grants,purchase of service contracts and relationship with several United Ways; (5) development of an active community education/public relations program including public speaking, news media relationship and frequent t.v. and radio appearances; (6) personnel management - overall staff supervision including hiring, firing, staff development, salary and benefits administration; (7) Leadership in developing effective relationship with local,state and national legislative representatives and officials re: family and children advocacy/social action concerns; (8) active participation in community planning, assessment of needs and coordination of services; (9) providing leadership and assistance in board and volunteer training, recruitment and development; (10) maintaining effective quality control through timely statistical data,recording and case management systems including computerization; (1 1) active participation and leadership in local/state/national professional groups and related associations; (12) contributing to the professional education of social work and related fields through field work instructional programs with Schools of Social Work. April 1970-Oct. 1971 SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA, SOCIAL WORKER IN PRIVATE PRACTICE Offering group and individual counseling. Also serving as Social Service Consultant to various local hospitals, nursing homes, and agencies primarily in the area of staff development and training. May 1963-April 1970 SACRAMENTO AREA MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA Executive Director: Major responsibilities include overall agency administration, community organization mainly in mental health planning, development and coordination of services. Responsibility for budgeting and fund raising, program and staff development, public relations, development of community educations programs for the lay public and professional groups,legislation and social action, policy Implementation and development, direct services through the use of trained volunteers, work with the Board of Directors, various committees and numerous community agencies and groups. Provided leadership on agency programs and policies and responsible for the coordination of the Associations' varied programs and activities into an effective team work operation. 1 Dec. 1960-April 1963 FAMILY SERVICE SOCIETY OF MARION COUNTY, MARION, OHIO Executive Director: Responsibilities include usual administration of entire agency program,budget, public relations,work with the Board of Directors and its various committees. Also supervision of several caseworkers, clerical and volunteers,staff development,research projects,coordination of service with other agencies, community planning, family life program, educational activities and expanding and developing new programs. April 1959-Dec. 1960 FAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE OF BLACK HAWK COUNTY, WATERLOO, IOWA Casework Supervisor: Served as Director of professional services, which included supervision of caseworkers and graduate and undergraduate students. Responsible for entire agency's casework program, staff development, public relation and community education programs. Limited caseload. Worked with Board's personnel policy committee, intake committee and community education committee. Developed agency research program Including studies related to community needs. Established and supervised Homemaker Service Program, group counseling and family life education programs. Assisted the executive director in other delegated administrative responsibilities such as: budget, annual reports, recruitment, board meetings and interagency relationships. July 1956-April 1959 BLACK HAWK COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER, WATERLOO, IOWA Psychiatric Counselor: Psychiatric social casework therapy with children and adults in a psychoanalytically oriented, all-purpose, out-patient community clinic. Participation in: intake, psychotherapy interviews, intensive group therapy, research, consultation to other agencies, educational (talks) and preventative community programs,work on committees,and some administrative responsibilities. Represent agency In inter-agency conferences. Field Work Supervisor: Supervising University of Iowa, School of Social Work, second year students. Involvement in the usual supervisory process and responsible in the development of the agency's training program for graduate students, including administrative functions related to supervision. Liaison between agency and school. Also performed above-described duties. Aug. 1952-Aug. 1954 U.S. ARMY, MEDICAL SERVICE CORPS. Psychiatric Social Work Technician: Usual psychiatric social work duties involving intake, social histories, and casework therapy. Psychiatric hospital with team approach providing variety of services. Served mentally ill servicemen and their families. In- and out-patients under fully trained social work and psychiatric supervision. Participated in in-service training and research. Chief Psychiatric Social Work Technician: For five months supervised three social workers and responsible for the majority of the administrative functions of the Social Work Section of the U.S. Army Hospital at Camp Pickett, VA. Also performed duties described above. PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS o National Association of Social Workers o A.C.S.W. - Academy of Certified Social Workers VOLUNTEER ACTIVITIES Past President, Illinois Association of Family Service Agencies, 1974-76 Member, Purchase of Service Committee of Child Care Association of Illinois, 1973-78 Member, Public Relations Committee, Family Service America, 1972-74 Chairman, Regional Council on Aging, 1972-74 o Active in Central Illinois National Association of Social Workers Chapter o Chairman, United Way Agency Executives Group, 1979 Member, Child Welfare League of America, Council of Executives, 1980-83 O Executive Committee, Family Service America Mid-West Regional Council and Chairman of Its Nominating Committee, 1981-84 O Member,National Family Service America,Evaluation and Strategic Planning Committee, 1986-89 REFERENCES Available Upon Request o / - 1�-+'.�-�1 vL '�`"`=`� .: iGt�,.`..-.,,�`.� �' �-C l r GC.'1'�,V's�►�,-c (,��L•'�',,<-vTw l S.p 2 1•JaA f T )��t+�.'...� 1 11 •1—Lf 1t�c.�• h� "r-- '_ �J • `3 �r • jXG� ., ="`�ri -eiLL L��'�1-�'r t •' (Ate-en/S e O R414-1- 4- to �2 S}2� z a, L 614'0 -'14416-4/ (ak tz et-e..r T 6*-/d.c,(/` rt(.ttit /-'~'���H//.r�_�1 /./' „/7•/..L.F-/r !_* '1't.�`��..e_Q_ CATERPILLAR® Treasurer Caterpillar Inc. Peoria. Illinois 61629 May 18, 1990 To whom it may concern: Although Henry Suozzi has been Executive Director of Counsel- ing and Family Service in Peoria, Illinois, for the past 19 years, I have been associated with him since May 1986. During those 4 years I have served as a member of the board of directors and most recently as 1st Vice President of the board. In this capacity I have had the opportunity to work quite closely with Henry. Henry is certainly a dedicated, experienced, and effective social services agency manager, as evidenced by his signifi- cant accomplishments at Counseling and Family Service. Henry did an exemplary job in raising funds and controlling the budget for the agency during his 19 year tenure with a 277% increase in the agency budget, a 212% increase in United Way funding, and over 1300% increase in government grants . Services provided have increased on a commensurate basis. Our agency certainly has grown in size, stature, and effec- tiveness under Henry's able leadership, but perhaps other factors are of greater importance to potential recipients of this letter. Henry's agency was well organized and con- trolled from both a personnel and fiscal standpoint, and it retained capable professional and clerical staff who were with the agency for many years. Henry also represented him- self and his agency well in the communities served and became well known locally as a media spokesman on social issues . He is well respected in his field by social services people at the lo;:al, state, and national level. I have enjoyed working with Henry and wish him well in his retirement. We on the board are sorry to see him leave. His contributions truly have been significant. Very truly yours, a. Len A. Kuchan bk WOODRUFF HIGH SCHOOL i 1800 N.E. PERRY AVENUE PEORIA. ILLINOIS 61603 PHONE: 672-6665 DAVID H.BARNWELL AREA CODE: 309 RICHARD A.BLAKEY PRINCIPAL HEAD COUNSELOR RODGER CLEMMER BARBARA J.BELL JOHN HATTON GERALD J.MCCANN ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANTS DEANS OF STUDENTS May 16, 1990 To Whom It May Concern: It is indeed a privilege to write a letter of recommendation for Mr. Henry Suozzi, Executive Director of Counseling and Family Service. Over the past eight years I have had the pleasure of being a board member at Counseling and Family Service, serving as President of the Board for two years. I have had the pleasure of seeing Mr. Suozzi, as chief executive officer of a medium size social service agency, run a very effective and efficient program. Mr. Suozzi is an excellent manager. He has the unique ability to manage both employees and administrative assistants. During the almost twenty years of Mr. Suozzi's administration at Counseling and Family Service he has overseen a dramatic increase in agency funding, has made agency services more easily attainable, expanded agency services to meet changing community needs, improved the visibility and respectability of the agency and received top marks from the National Council of Accreditation of Service for Families and Children. Henry Suozzi is an outstanding man. He is a hard working honest individual who knows how to establish and reach goals. His dedication to duty and professionalism has caused him to have the well deserved respect of his staff, his board of directors, his peers, and the Peoria community. His shoes will be hard to fill. His experience will be missed. It has been my pleasure to support and be a part of Counseling and Family Service under the direction of Mr. Henry Suozzi. Sincerely, 42%C't: e4 David H. Barnwell, Principal DHB/mjf • r r FSA Family Service America May 9, 1990 Ed N,r H Ruzinsx y Cra•man Jan Se person Vice Chairman Cha'e; S McNeer Mr. Henry Suozzi v cc:Chairman Executive Director Hon Judge Sharon J Bell Counseling and Family Service Sec etary Gunther Borris 1821 North Knoxville Avenue Treasurer Peoria, IL 61603 Geneva B. Johnson President and Ch.'e4 Executive Office! Dear Henry: What a privilege it is to write this letter and to know that your many contributions to the Family Service movement will be recognized by a reception honoring your 19 years as Executive Director of Counseling and Family Service. I sincerely regret that I will be unable to be present and personally congratulate you. You have provided leadership and guidance to Counseling and Family Service to the extent that it represents one of the best managed agencies in the FSA movement. You have been independent and, yet, you understood the need to be involved in the wider community. You served with distinguished competence in various FSA activities. You have been flexible and able to change directions and shift strategies. I have, personally, enjoyed my relationship with you, Henry, and the FSA movement is richer because of your commitment to strengthening families and your participation in FSA to make your commitment become a reality. You have been a true professional who has always been willing to participate and share ideas. You have been loved and respected by your peers. We will miss your astute and sensitive leadership, and your deep loyalty and commitment to the Family Service movement will leave a void. We, at Family Service America, appreciate you and wish you good health and much happiness in your retirement years as you pursue other interests and do "what you want to do when you want to do it". May you enjoy new and exciting experiences in your life. Sincerely, eneva B. Johnson President and Chief Executive Officer GBJ/bjb 11700 West Lake Park Drive Park Place Milwaukee. WI 53224 (414)359-1040 Fax(414)359-1074 Families Strengthen America New York Washington,D.C. �Pt.,t•�v �:a? .• L'317 rEgn tZ 6Isi Pt • 1 _ ORO VALLEY BOARD/COMMISSION APPLICATION Dear Oro Valley Citizen: We appreciate your interest in the Town of Oro Valley. Enclosed is an informational form which when completed will allow us to quickly process your application. While the information asked for is optional, your supplying the information will greatly assist in an understanding of education, experience and background to allow the best possible use of your talents which you are so kindly willing to provide to the Town of Oro Valley and for which we thank you. Please return to the Town Clerk's Office, 1l,000 North La Canada Drive, Oro Valley,Arizona 85737-7015. Name 7 A RiEt4 Last First Middle Home Address - I&LL ( Business Address � - , ' Home Phone - Business Phone jel Number of Years in Oro Valley �— / ..) — .tZ6 4. 1. • e Date Please state which board/commission you wish to join and why. - — G/U/C— • —/ 4J) 40, diro e_e Please list other community, civic, professional, social educational, cultural or athletic organizations you have been affiliated with, length of time, any office held, and any achievements in those organizations you feel are noteworthy. What do you consider your highest responsibility, skill or achievement; professionally and/or personally, and why. ,"i K- ;-x-ci-" 141./Tz ;c6-,-- ;-5- 4vee' 7- AV' /Y#47-11&--- ,-S vim-v //1/1" --77-7--,ti- EMPLOYMENT / EMPLO T Please list previous employment. List your past or present employment first: ,v_g-EA) /6 D. 4 _ -' z - �� \ ‹- Dates Dates of Employment Company Name&Address GL.2 r'y'e-v 1. t,) = f?it� l (isci i 2. dam_. is - C1 1. 771` _ f� z . G-7A71 o 3. 4. 5. (List Position&Job Description in numbered order as listed above) LO (22) //ed / etc. S ,. � S-, rCe=ca/ }✓r CSL a u EDUCATION Briefly describe your educational background: Institution/School Degree Received 1..ONS.2T C n ., '/�4/fy � 8/ ' ::76 y' 3. A- f- 2_1711-C vr-dO /, 27 �. 4. 5. Area of Study in numbered order as listed above: Other fields of study, professional institutes,training program, etc: IF DESIRED, FURTHER INFORMATION MAY BE ATTACHED 3 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 4 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: September 1, 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Bayer Vella, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Approval of Additional Membership to the Environmentally.Sensitive Lands Ordinance Public Advisory Committee BACKGROUND: At the July 21, 1999 meeting, the Town Council approved a list of proposed ESL Public Advisory Committee (PAC) members. Furthermore, staff was directed to consider including representatives from Sector Boards 5, 6, and 7. Even though each of the aforementioned Sectors lie outside of the Town boundaries, there was a concern that all General Plan areas should be represented on the PAC. Also since the July meeting, the Planning Division has a received a request from Richard Ames, of Vistoso Partners. L.L.C., to be included as a PAC member. ADDITIONAL REPRESENTATION: Because the PAC will guide the development of a vision statement, goals & policies, and draft ordinance, staff wishes to insure that there is a proportional balance of a myriad of interests. An equally significant concern is that the PAC is viewed as an inclusive body. To that end, inviting representatives from Sector Boards 5, 6, and 7 is an idea to be embraced. It should be noted; however, that the PAC will no longer be considered a Town "citizen only" committee. To date, we have contacted each of the Sector Board chairpersons and some other members of those boards and only one person has indicated willingness to serve on the PAC--Mr. Joe Murray of Sector Board 6. We will continue are efforts to contact members of Sector Boards 5 and 7. Since the 7/21/99 Town Council meeting, Richard Maes has formally requested (see-attached letter) that he be included as a member of the PAC. As a representative of the largest expanse of open space within the Town, a representative of Vistoso Partners should be included. Staff asserts that the committee would retain a proportional balance of interests. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adding Joe Murray, Dick Maes, and two open positions for Sector Boards 5 and 7 to the Public Advisory Committee. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 2 SUGGESTED MOTION: The Oro Valley Town Council may wish to consider one of the following motions: I move to approve the addition of Joe Murray, Dick Maes, and open positions for Sector Boards 5 and 7 to the ESL Public Advisory Committee. OR I move to approve the addition of only to the Public Advisory Committee. ATTACHMENT: Letter from Dick Maes / 0./ bi.:),r Planni7V Zoning Administrator -ntjj_Ala Co 's'1 ity Development ? ►-ctor 4 Town Manager F:\PROJECTS\ESLO\TAC&PAC\Council PAC Additions.doc 08/17/99 10:59 FAX 602 831 1330 VISTOSO PARTNERS Cj 002/002 VI5TOSO PAcmERs. LLC 1121 WEST WARNER ROAb • SUITE 109 • TEMPE, ARI2QNA 85284 (480) 831-2000 • FAX (480) 893-1604 • August 17, 1999 Mr. Bryant Nodine Town of Oro Valley 11000 North La Canada Drive Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 Re: Environmentally Sensitive Lands Ordinance Committee Dear Bryant: to our conversation, I would like to formally request to be included on In follow up Lands the committee that reviews the Environmentally Sensitive Lands ordnance. I believe it is important to have a representative of the Rancho Vistoso project included in decisions being made. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, PlioAck Richard Maes TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: September 1, 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Paul K.Nzomo,P.E., Civil Engineer: CIP& Development Bryant Nodine,AICP,Planning and Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING OV12-99-07, GRADING EXCEPTION REQUEST FOR LA CANADA/LAMBERT COMMERCIAL CENTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUMMARY: The applicant, the WLB Group Inc., is representing the owner's request to exceed the cut/fill provision of the Grading Ordinance. On June 29, 1999 the Development Review Board (DRB) voted 4-3 to deny the grading exception for this project because the applicant did not meet all six standard conditions as per the Grading Ordinance. As per the Grading Ordinance, the applicant may apply any decision of the DRB within 20 days of the decision to the Mayor and Council. REPORT: The property is located on the southeast corner of Lambert Lane and La Canada Drive. It is abutted on the east by a golf course and soil cement channel, to the south by La Canada Villages Block A, to the west by La Canada Drive and to the north by Lambert Lane. This property is currently undeveloped with topography that slopes uniformly to the southeast with a range of 3-5% slopes, with the exception of the two hills on the property. The tallest hill is near Lambert Lane, at the northeast corner of the property, and is about 25 feet high. The other hill is near La Canada Drive, at the southwest corner of the property, and is about 20 feet high. Cuts of up to 31 feet and 14 feet, respectively, are proposed in the development plan for these hills. The plan also proposes 5-12 feet of fill for the perimeter buildings on the lower elevations of the site to the south and east. The cuts and fills are best illustrated by the cross-sections included with the attached development plan. Impact of Future Lambert Lane Improvements The applicant has stated that when Lambert Lane is widened to its ultimate section it will have a significant impact on the northeast hill. Lambert Lane is a 150' right-of-way. This street is not programmed to be improved to its full width in the Town's next 5 year Capital Improvement Projects. The only improvements planned for this street are safety improvements, which will include a multi-use pathway. Hence, it is difficult to speculate the future cross-section. Regardless, if Lambert Lane was to be improved and did encroach into the hill in question, there are various engineering methodologies to increase the slope of the cut and minimize impacts on the hill. Developability Without a Grading Exception According to the subdivision standards, the maximum slope allowed for a driveway is 8% and the ADA horizontal maximum slope is 5.0% continuously with no more than a 2% cross slope. With the exception of the two hills, the existing topography of the site falls between 3-5 %. Thus the site has a adequate fall for drainage and sewerage and should be able to meet Code and ADA requirements--the site can be developed g and meet all the above standards without a grading exception. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 3 Criteria for a Grading Exception The Grading Code states that DRB may grant a grading exception if it finds that all of the following six standards have been met: 1. The property is buildable; and Staff: The site is buildable. 2. Granting the exception constitutes the minimum to allow the proposed improvement; and Staff: The site has 3-5 % fall with the exception of the two hills on site. Hence, the site can be developed without a grading exception. 3. The conditions on the property are unique and effectively deny improvement; and Staff: The conditions on the property (the hill remnants) are unique, but the site can be developed without a grading exception. 4. The exception does not constitute a granting of special privilege, and does not substitute for creative design; and Staff: It could be argued that any exception grants a special privilege. Though "creative design" is a very subjective term, the applicant has responded to the site by: (1) stepping the floor elevations of the buildings to follow the contours of the site; (2) removing the southeast most building to create a grade break; (3) lowering the rear circulation and parking elements; and placing a detention basin at the southeast corner of the property. All of these design changes help to minimize the required fills and their impact on surrounding properties. 5. The exception is necessary to adapt the improvement to the land; and Staff: The applicant's position is that the exception is necessary to fit the typical commercial center on the site. This is correct, however, fitting a typical improvement on the site is just the opposite of adapting an improvement to the site. The applicant does not meet this standard, because they propose to use the grading exception to adapt the site to the proposed improvement. 6. That the exception will not negatively impact the community, the neighborhood or the public welfare. Staff: Staff has received numerous calls from citizens in the immediate areas expressing a variety of concerns regarding this project. Those concerns that relate to this exception are: the removal of the hill at the northeast corner of the site; the visual impact of the fill from south of the site on La Canada Drive (see the proposed south property line cross-section graphic); and the visual impact of the fill from the golf course and homes east of the site. DRB CONSIDERATION AND ACTION The Development Review Board (DRB) reviewed this grading exception request on 6/29/99 at a public hearing and denied it by a 4-3 (Underwood/Vogelsberg/Lewis) vote. As noted in the attached minutes, the reasons for denying the exception were that the site could be build without the exception and the application did not meet all six standard conditions listed above. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 3 RECOMMENDATION: Staff has reviewed the grading exception request for this development and must recommend denial because the project does not meet all the six criteria listed above. If the Council chooses to approve this grading exception, Staff recommends the following conditions, which would allow the hills to be cut but would ensure that the fill on the perimeter of the site meets the Grading Code: 1. Fills on the perimeter of the site will be limited to 6', or 8' if terracing is utilized. 2. Constructed slopes shall not exceed 12' high measured vertically from the existing grade to the proposed grade. 3. Any excess material shall be hauled into an approved offsite location. SUGGESTED MOTION: The Council may wish to consider one of the following motions: I move to deny applicant's appeal of the grading exception, OV 12-99-07, finding that OR I move to approve the applicant's appeal of the grading exception, OV 12-99-07, [with the conditions included in the staff recommendation]. Attachments: 1. Grading Exception Application 2. Excerpt of June 29, 1999 DRB Minutes 3. Appeal of DRB Decision 4. Reduction of Development Plan 5. Supplemental Graphics Planni Zoning Administrator 7")(gt:A1-1, Y Community Development :irector // Town Manage �:\OV\OV 12\1999\OV 12-99-7\TCROV 129907GRADINGWAIVERFORLACANADALAMBERT.doc TOWSOF ORO VALLEY APPLICATION FOR GRADLNG VARIANCE DA1'E: 5717799—Revised-6/15/99 OV CASE NO.: (Office use only) PROJECT NAME: La Canada Lambert Commercial Center PROPOSED USE Commercial/Retail NO. OF UNITS: N/A ACRES: 14.9 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Southeast corner La Canada Drive and Lambert Lane NATURE OF REQUEST/MODIFICATION TO GRADING ORDINANCE REQUESTED: Please see attached. APPLICANT: The WLB Group,Inc. ADDRESS: 4444 E.Broadway Blvd.,Tucson.AZ 85711 PHONE NO.: 881-7480 PROPERTY OWNER: Arcade Development Company ADDRESS: 800 Atrium I Bldg.839,5'Ave.SW.Calgary Alberta T2-3C8. Canada PHONE NO.: PROJECT ENGINEER: The WLB Group.Inc. ADDRESS: 4444 E.Broadway Blvd..Tucson,AZ 85711 SIGNATURE: 2DATE: 5/17199 You must submit 12 copies of the proposed grading plan,a$150.00 fee and a list of all property owners within 300 feet of the proposed site at least 21 calendar days prior to the desired hearing date. Additional written supporting material may also be required to further describe your plans. LA CANADA l LAMBERT COMMERCIAL CENTER NATURE OF REQUEST/N. MODIFICATION TO GRADTh G ORDINANCE REQUESI.ED:- ADDENDUM (Revised June 15, 1999) A grading waiver is requested with respect to the amount of cut and fill that is permitted on the site. The property contains two isolated hills that remain as remnants of larger ridges that existed prior to roadway development adjacent to the site and are the source of the request for additional cut. Additional fill is required in order to establish developed grades that do not exceed Town standards and safe engineering practice. FILLS Design effort has been emphasized in order to lower the grades (fills) on this site while respecting the Town of Oro Valley's design standards and following general engineering safety guidelines. Entry drives have been revised to have the maximum slope allowable by Town standards as they"drop"into the site from La Canada Drive and Lambert Lane, thereby reducing the amount of fill for building pads. Overall,fills have been reduced throughout the project by 5'to 7' at the main buildings. All proposed retaining walls have been eliminated with the exception of a short length of retaining wall required at the southwest corner of the project All other perimeter locations shall "daylight"using landscape enhanced slopes. CUTS The isolated hill along Lambert Lane consists primarily of an exposed cut slope that was created by grading existing Lambert Lane. The owner and developer of the site request that a significant cuts and fills be permitted to support the development of a retail center on the site. The cut will include removal of both small hills on the propertyWhile the majority of the cuts will be within current standards,the peak of the hill along Lambert Lane will require an approximately 28 foot cut. It should be noted that the eventual widening of Lambert Lane will cause a significant impact to this hill, with the possibility of an 18-20 foot cut and the removal of about one-half of the hill along Lambert Lane. The roadway cut condition found on the subject property is somewhat unique to the immediate vicinity where road building has left significant exposed cuts which are unsightly Panddonot leave enough original land form intact to be considered a visual, aesthetic or functional asset to either the neighborhood or development of the subject property. The retail center has been planned and designed in coordination with the development of the property abutting to the south;Villages of La Canada,Block A. Specifically, grading design for the two properties has been integrated to accommodate planned and suitable uses of the property P rtY while reducing the amount of import/export of material. La Canada/Lambert Commercial Center Grading Waiver Application - Supplement Grading Waiver Criteria Revised 611199 The following is submitted in support of our application for a grading waiver on property located at the southeast corner of La Canada Drive and Lambert Lane. This narrative addresses the six criteria established by the Oro Valley Zoning Code in relation to grading waivers. 1. The project site for the proposed commercial center is a buildable site. 2. The exception to cut and fill requirements is intended to be the minimum cuts and fills necessary in order to develop the site for commercial uses as planned and zoned, under sound and accepted engineering practice. Accepted standards as to driveway grades, sidewalk and walkway slopes and ADA requirements act to limit the amount of Bade change that can be established on a developed site. In order to reduce fills any further, maximum slopes and grades would likely be exceeded. 3. The isolated hill remnants found on the subject are unique in that many property qu of the existing contours,particularly those most visible to the public,are man made. At the time of area roadway construction and golf course construction, considerable cuts and fills were created through ridges and hillsides. The remnants of grading activities for Lambert Lane,La Canada Drive,and the drainageway to the east, are the primary subject of this grading waiver application. it is these hillside remnants that are, 1) unique to the • immediate vicinity of Lambert Lane and La Canada Drive,and, 2)the cause of other grading waiver approvals. 4. No special privilegeis sought through this gradingwaiver application. Development of the subject property for planned, accepted and zoned land uses is intended. Design of commercial centers are often dictated by access locations and site constraints. in order to respond to the unique conditions of the site, the design has been revised in several ways: a) finished floor elevations for the buildings have been stepped to respond to the existing topographic conditions, b) a section of building has been removed to accommodate a"grade break"through the middle of the commercial center, c) an outdoor courtyard has been added to the design to provide a transition in grade change and an outdoor pedestrian space between the retail buildings, d) rear circulation and parking areas have been lowered in elevation to reduce fill amounts 5. The grading exception is necessary to allow for the development of the site as a commercial center. The design of the improvements have been altered to respond to the center. The design of the improvements have been altered to m respond to the to oa hic p p � F features of the site. Typical commercial centers are developed on relatively flat sites (1%-2% slope). This site typically slopes 4%-5%, and the site design has been adapted to more closely build to the land, as intended by the grading ordinance. 6. The additional cut and fill requested will not be materially dtrimental to the rights of property owners and residents. There are no existing residences adjacent to the development site, and particularly the isolated hill along Lambert Lane. Further,there are no adjacent properties that rely on the existing contours to provide screening or buffering. The adjacent properties include the Canada Hills golf course,the Smith's shopping center,Walgreen's, Canada Crossroads, and the Villages of La Canada Block A. It should be noted that the hill located along Lambert Lane will be severely impacted by the eventual redevelopment of the Lambert Lane roadway. Based on anticipated widening and the addition of pedestrian and bike facilities,the new facility will cut severely into the existing hillside,just as the existing Lambert Lane's construction did. In summary, development of this site or any site creates impacts to the community; the additional cuts and fills requested do not act to increase the impact of the development of this property. W:1HEID1\1990131beztakgrading EXCERPT OF MINUTES OF THE ORO VALLEY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING Tuesday June 29th, 1999 PUBLIC HEARING: OV12-99-7 GRADING WAIVER, LA CANADA/LAMBERT LANE COMMERCIAL CENTER (continued from June 8, 1999 DRB meeting) Paul Nzomo introduced the staff report into the record. This project was continued from DRB meeting of 6/8/99 because it did not meet the Town of Oro Valley code. The applicant WLB Group In. is representing the owner's request to exceed the cut/fill provision of the Grading Ordinance. The property is abutted on the east by a golf course and soil cement channel, to the south by La Canada Villages Block A, to the west by La Canada Drive and to the north by Lambert Lane. The site has a good fall for the drainage as well as sewer fall. Hence, the site can be developed and meet all the above standards without a grading waiver. The Public Works Department staff has reviewed the grading exception request for this development and recommends denial because the project does not meet all the six standard criteria. David Williams, WLB, thanked staff for all the work that has gone into this project. He commented he had spoken with Mr. Nzomo about meeting the criteria and hoped to explain how the project met the six standards for the grading waiver. The project location is the southeast corner of Lambert Lane and La Canada. This site has been a part of Canada Hills since the original conception and zoned by the Town in the late 1980's for community commercial center. He pointed out where the shopping center would be and the three fountain areas along with the parking lots as well as pedestrian walkways and seating areas. There would be 125,000 square feet of building area. The front would have arch covered walkways. We have redesigned this site four times. We have also redesigned the driveways in order to meet staff standards. We are within the six-foot cut and the six-foot fill for eighty percent of this site. The grading waiver request is affecting 20 percent of the site. Mr. Williams pointed out what areas would be affected by the waiver. He commented that many areas in Canada Hills were built on cuts and fill that far exceed the six-foot cut. He provided photos of the site with different angles of the building in place to give the Board Members an idea of how it would look. Mr. Williams stated he spoke with the managers of the golf course showed them the plan and they had no objections to the grading waiver. Mr. Williams proceeded to explain how the project met the six criteria. The first criteria, relates to is the property buildable. Mr. Williams stated he felt the property is buildable. The second criteria, relates to minimum cuts and fills necessary in order to develop the site for commercial uses as planned and zoned, under sound and accepted engineer practice. We feel this is the minimum necessary to allow the center to be developed given the constrained standards needed to live with for public safety purposes. Third criteria, we feel there are two isolated hills, we feel they are man made they are not natural slopes. The other projects around this property have been developed and have exceeded the cut and fill. The fourth criteria, we have redesigned this plan four times, our intention is to develop the subject property for planned accepted and zoned land uses. In order to respond to the unique conditions of this site, the design has been revised in several ways. We feel it's a hardship to require a six-foot compliance of cut and fill. Similar properties have had greater cuts and fills. The fifth criteria, this is not a custom home-site, it's a commercial center and most centers have floors of the same elevation. This design has been altered to respond to topographic features and adapted to build to the land as intended by Oro Valley's grading ordinance. The final criteria, we know we can't make everyone happy but we feel we have come up with a design that meets the intents and spirit of the Town's grading ordinance. The additional cut and fill requested will not be materially detrimental to the right of the property owners. PUBLIC HEARING OPENED Rosemary Fruend, 10503 N. Fairway Vista, commented she lives next to this site, and when they moved to Autumn Hill it was to enjoy the views of the hills and the desert area. The hill has charm and a sense of privacy. There are homes who would look and see this development, I say we do not need another shopping center and the hills do not need to be leveled. Leave the hills alone. Vincent Baiocchetti, 989 W. Fox Ridge Lane, stated he served on a planning commission in another state for 13 years, he understands the function of planning and zoning enforcement's. The planning development is used by homeowners and businesses to determine if they want to move in a particular area. Waivers cause problems, he feels it's important to follow the plan, things should only be changed in extreme cases. Reason for changes are due generally for profit/construction costs. Rarely does the plan ever profit the town or the citizens. The hills are a unique screening, if you are going to err always err on the side of the community for no change. Bonnie Harris, 1212 W. Desert Greens Way, felt the land is buildable it does not need a waiver. She likes the hill as it is. The hill acts as a natural buffer to the homes that live around it and should be left alone. The Town makes rules and laws that we must abide by, only in extreme cases should a variance be granted and there is nothing here extreme enough for that variance. Rarely does the plan ever profit the Town. We have unique screening and I would like to leave the hill as it is. If the hill were to be taken down it would affect the noise and the lighting in Autumn Hill. It is not necessary for the Town to grant this waiver there is no reason to. Geo Jae, 10262 N. Hacienda Hermosa, he would like to see the grading waiver denied. People have been coming before this Board to make sure our hills remain intact and are not graded away. I would ask the Board to deny this waiver. Jim Ruhman, 10380 N. Hacienda Hermosa, commented he lives directly behind the northwest corner of the property. He asked the Board to support the residents. The developer bought the property as is, the objective of a grading ordinance is to require for post development plan to accommodate existing conditions. Please vote no to the request of the developer. Require them to submit a plan that would require them to develop without the need of a grading variance. The challenge to the Board is hold the developer responsible to develop this property as close to as is, as possible. Please ask yourself could this property be built on without a waiver. I ask the Board to look strongly at the six standards that need to be met. I'm asking the developer to build to the existing land not the land to conform to the development. This land can be developed without a waiver. Russ Rumley, 11091 N Tapestry Drive, commented he had been in Oro Valley one year. He comes from an area in Colorado that is heavily zoned. He has seen how variances have been given and the neighborhoods have been sacrificed. What is the benefit of granting the waiver, what is really served by it, is it serving the community, who are the tenants. If no change is made what is the benefit of no change. He expressed he would like to see the site developed with the existing zoning requirements, and the waiver be denied. Rich Young, publisher of the Oro Valley Times, provided pictures for the Board which showed the views from the back of his home, several homes will be effected by this development, all seventy lots would not approve of this waiver. He commented that this developer bought the land as is at a cheap price because of the hill. Now they want to grade the hill. He commented that the developer would leave if they could not get the waiver, well I'm telling you the developer is not going to leave, that is just a bluff. Mr. Young stated he is for the development of that site but not at the expense of taking down the hill. Jerry Roberts, 10280 N. Cmo. Valdeflores, one thing that is not shown is the people that live in the Rancho Feliz area, when that project is built, they will be looking at parking lots. A lot of people will be effected by this development. I don't feel a grading waiver is necessary, build with what is there and work with the community, it can be done. I ask the Board to have the developer work with the people. Vote no on the grading waiver. Karen Stratman, 1707 Placita Caracol, commented when she bought her house she spent more time on her own landscaping than what been given to this development. What will the drainage do once the site is covered by a parking lot? Where is it going to go will the Town be responsible for the drainage? What about the added traffic volume. A lot of people will be effected by this development. She doesn't feel that the developer needs a grading waiver. No one wants to see parked cars, please vote no on this grading waiver. There are other possibilities. She would like to see variety and creativity for this corner. Walgreen's gave up their hill, why can't these developers do the same. The Walgreen's site looks very nice. Please vote no on this waiver. Bill Adler, 1720 N. Eagle Eye Place, commented we need to preserve and conserve. Mr. Williams tried to justify the need for the waiver by using the questionable judgment grading on other properties. Each project should be looked at on its own merits. Always trying to look at the opportunity to make something better than the past. I would say look at this property on its own merit. Consistency on its own is not a valid justification. It is possible to work out the issues with the residents. This property seems to be created with a specific retail use in mind. A specific retail use has space requirements which require a waiver. To me, that's granting a special privilege. The conditions on the property are unique they do not effectively deny improvements. The developer needs to come back with a different plan. Only two of the six findings comply with this project. Four of the standards are not met and you can't justify the waiver. There are alternatives, give the developer a chance to come back with a different plan. Greg Kish, 861 W. Annadale, stated he accepts that that property will be developed as commercial. He is against the grading waiver. He asked are the peak heights consistent with the other projects in the area. He also expressed concern about the peak flows from heavy rains. Can the Town cover if a problem arises from the rain flow. Ro Young, 10421 N. Autumn Hill, felt that the developer was not listening to the people that they want something different. This can be a workable piece of property; the further back it sets the less impact it will have on the residents. There is also the issue of the telephone pole, I see there is another letter to come back to get the telephone pole again. The developer keeps coming back and back until they finally ware down the people and then get what they want. Valerie Feuer wanted to clarify that this is not the same developer as the Villages, the engineering firm is the same, but the issue with the conditional use permit and why its going back to the commission, is because there was an error, all the people that were required did not receive notice. We don't normally see issues keeping coming back, such as the issue with the pole. Ann Rose, 1161 W Desert Way, wanted to make one point; she is against the variance. Her point was to the developer, that this is an opportunity for them to establish some integrity. Work with the residents and make a change that would please all of the community. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED Five minute recess. Mr. Hank Nelson, representing the developer Beztak, commented he has developed in Oro Valley since 1985, He developed the Village of La Canada, Rooney Ranch Center, and also the Golf Villas of Oro Valley. For the record in the Villages of La Canada the cuts and fills where much larger than 20 feet and much deeper than six feet. He would like to clarify a comment that was made by Mr. Young,we did not purchase that site for pennies on the dollar as a matter of fact we have not bought the site yet. It doesn't close until tomorrow. We will pay market value for the sight. It has been in the plan for Oro Valley from day one as a commercial site. When a Town creates a corner like this one and calls it a commercial center, there is an obligation to allow the site to be developed as has been ruled and named. It is true that you could build on this site. Would it be economically viable as a commercial center if you took out 20 percent of the dirt, I don't think so. We are allowed to cover 31 percent of the property with building floor, are plan as it stands today is 19 percent of the site with building floor. We may have to look at different uses, under the zoning code we are allowed to put single family houses if we wanted to, or apartments. Staff and others asked us to try and make a viable commercial out of it. I am here tonight asking to make this property developable for us, it is not developable now as is. It has been in the plan from day one to be a commercial center and we feel like we have operated within the restrictions and now trying to capitalize on the opportunity. David Williams, WLB, we have appreciated the comments we have heard tonight and the time people have taken to express their concerns. It was stated that many homes can see this sight, if you have been out to the site there is only one subdivision that sits higher than the site. There are four or five homes at most that look directly at this site. The Oro Valley General Plan is one of the most intensive public input document this Town has undertaken and it's a very good reflection of where this Town wants to go. There has never been any other reason that this land would be developed as a commercial center. This is consistent with Oro Valley's General Plan. Commercial opportunities in Oro Valley are encouraged to make the most of the designated locations by constructing substantial attractive buildings with full improvements convenience and safety. This is the type of project that we are bringing to the Town unfortunately it needs a grading waiver and we feel that waiver falls within the standards. We feel the market is read to bring in tenants. We ask for approval of the grading waiver. Member Underwood commented he has lived in Oro Valley for fifteen years, some projects would have not gotten built without waivers. Member Underwood feels that the hill is ugly, the site is not viable without the waiver. But if the residents love it they love it. Is there any way to compromise the building, like shift things keep a part of the hill and create a nice seating area in back of the hill? We would have to grant a waiver for the rest of the site, but would it be possible to do something like that. David Williams replied we don't see it that way, we have looked at keeping the hill, we can go back and rework the plan but we have abandon the ideal of trying to save the hill. It works against the design and against the concept. Member Underwood commented that the grading waiver should tie to the architecture, we need to look at the whole picture. Member Glueck agreed with Member Underwood, the hill has an attachment to the residents, but she is not convinced that all six standards have been met. Why does something have to be so set in stone is there no room for compromise. David Williams commented that we are open to design ideas but feel there is a need to remove the hill. Member Underwood said what if the hill is re-engineered partly taken down and heavily planted as a buffer. Mr. Williams replied that the widening of Lambert Lane would eventually impact the hill. Member Smith stated that everyone knows its commercial but not necessarily a commercial center and would vote against granting the waiver. Member Mager felt the plan should be redone. Member Mager wanted to clarify with Mr. Williams, was she correct that WLB would rather not come back with a plan than includes the hill. Mr. Williams replied yes. Member Mager asked would the developer appeal to Council. Mr. Williams replied he did not know if they would appeal to Council,there is a good possibility if the waiver is denied. Our request is action tonight, we would preferred this be approved. Member Bell commented looking at the scale of the development to her it doesn't seem to fit. What is aesthetically pleasing, is there some way to work this out, possibly scale back to keep the hill. We should keep looking at this and keep it more viable to where the Town is happy and the developer is happy. Mr. Williams stated we are willing to come back but we are not going to make everyone happy. Valerie Feuer explained that the alternatives could be. It doesn't look like anyone is willing to approve it as is. But it could be approved with conditions that would meet the design considerations. Secondly it could be denied but also with that denial, state those concerns and issues should the developer appeal to the Council those concerns would be a part of the record. Finally it could be continued, but that is not the desire of the applicant. Member Vogelsberg commented about the viewscape from the back of this building. Is there any way to design around it and maintain a part of the hill. Charlie Hulsey, WLB, commented can we move buildings, we have already been though that process. We have tried not to bring a plan that would not work, however we would like an opportunity for a work session, it will give the Board Members a better understanding of what goes into a commercial center. Member Glueck welcomed a work session as long as it's not a lecture but a discussion, she would consider a better plan. Valerie Feuer thought a work session would be valuable if the intention is to understand that process. If the Board felt that anything at all would come out of the session then have it, but for this project to continue, she felt they would not be getting anywhere. Member Mager felt it would not change her mind. Member Smith agreed with Member Mager it would not change his mind. MOTION: Moved, seconded (Smith/Mager) and carried by a 4-3 vote (No Underwood/Vogelsberg/Lewis) to deny Grading Exception Request for La Canada/Lambert Commercial Center Development Plan OV12-99-7. Discussion of motion: Member Mager wants it known that she has moved into that area of the commercial center and she welcomes it. She does not agree with this plan and does not support it and votes to deny as she felt it could be built without a waiver. Member Glueck asked if the motion is denied can an amendment be added if it goes to Council for appeal can there be a study session between DRB and Council before it goes to council so this can be discussed. Valerie replied if the person who made the motion and the secondary agree to that, then it could be added. Member Smith asked what does taking this to a study session going to do. He does not agree to amend the motion. He stated he felt it could be built without a waiver. Member Bell agrees it is a buildable site without the waiver. Member Underwood stated he would vote against it because he felt the site requires a waiver. Member Glueck commented she would vote against the waiver because the site is buildable, she is uncomfortable with the lack of compromise and besides all the standards have not been met. he Engineering • Planning WLB Surveying • Urban Cesign Landscape Architecture uroup July 19, 1999 Honorable Mayor and Town Council Town of Oro Valley 11,000 N. La Canada Dr. Oro Valley, AZ 85737 Subject: La Canada/Lambert Commercial Center Grading Waiver Denial WLB #199013A001 Dear Council members, The Development Review Board recently denied our application for a grading waiver for the above referenced project. We still believe strongly that the best way to develop the subject property includes the removal of the small hill remnant along Lambert Lane - necessitating a grading ordinance waiver. Therefore, under the provisions of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised, we are appealing the decision of the DRB to the Oro Valley Town Council. We feel the grading waiver has strong merits and should be considered closely based on those merits as outlined in our grading waiver application. We believe the application meets the established criteria for grading waivers, and, we believe the project is an important part of the planned and developing land use pattern in Oro . Valley. The planned development of this property is tied to the development of the Villages of La Canada Block A, and it is hoped these two sites can be developed simultaneously. Such cooperative development allows the earth moving activities to occur between these two sites, alleviating the need for heavy truck traffic on public streets importing or exporting dirt during the development stage. Engineering • Planning • Surveying • Urban Design • Landscape Architecture Offices located in Tucson , Phoenix, Las Vegas • E-mail : wibtuc@ix. netcom.com 4444 East Broadway • Tucson, Arizona 85711 • (520) 881-7480 • FAX (520) 881-7492 The yyLB group Oro Valley Council July 19, 1999 Page 2 We appreciate the Council's consideration of this appeal and would be happy to supply any additional information you may desire. Sincerely, THE WLB GROUP, INC. z) _ .,y David A. Williams, AICP Planning and Landscape Architecture c: Hank Nelson, Beztak Companies W:\11=1\199013\grading-a ppeal.ltr P 2 co / -----, .„ . (//e, itqii lb --• ,tfti; • / ,,,,,, ,.--,. -----,,,—__ — .- -..... , ; . .... _, ..-- -'a a 3 .jillkallifillifak.1111101-W101111111111111111111.11011104. : .. rzik Now.,_ mrakftradmilk...1111111L____Miamik vii__•__ __.1:1 DA DRIVEWORM illiklis - -I -11w,--.......„....7mima.--- - •. : imi --;17 ‘,.............„,....,.4 , i F itVilig • ___—__.; _, rilf, ---"1"4---,..........—•"...4,.. -iffar'...--siii-.-wm „.-4.-_—...... ---,-. ' NI I 11111110 avelis-6.1,MOPtimilimilitliFfair.-- : -_,I... iss.:... „f , ii,*--'-'re--,(,i, IN:i7.: ,1_.....,„, '''(1i N :- iNTAmiklivenkvilIPFkli--fl[,------'"'" intriMMANguiPilam%.% i i ... P -•,..-,, ,,,--- • --..,,----„,.,,,,,,w,iik„A A . IA 7' Jr"Pirleft4M7F"1:711: LT ' 41,11(g 'Er 4 uml ' t a - 1 g. A i . •. • .......1..! A 11;• 1 e ! 1 imipii, A. 4.:','...'11M. i'.1 '- LI litl. ii. 1-1 •i' Tn„ itCliiii311151 . I - tow- Alwr ,,_ r4t: =II INN mi*---11), .1-41h • . .1_ A___..4._.a- 1 ._.A1 : . ,.=-'---•-•--rw dr ob.04......;T*.d...mVor,ws3N5=.1111-74: paritprigat ' P..I '' MOlikni ' iti' tlikl-- 441FRVIIIILE":11:1 . it 4'. lirth 'IPA" - i '' j4k At ' lb 'MI If 4.411: r l'i 'IN IltVpi 1 .iil a IP ti 1 i !,, - - • . iit ii. 46 •_..t.k, I p. LLAT-71_" - ..iii.:1 ig, I . P ZI ' 1 ill I .6 III . 1 I f. t filk- , rh....i . 4- .. -.i 4 ; ., i krill I -iP ii L- • IL --- I Imp: -, ' .. 1 II :: '40 I A a....., 1 t,, • . - , m'W: -•111K. .:mu m. . I *IL __ ihrir . .1•Kuosa Niiii 1, yriolrjr1 I • 1-, i i• ) ' • )k 7. 4644 i •,Q.'.-. :i ..7,Np:N. Nk....),. ,,,, ‘ ilk11401 c.*:.4\i" ' .1.;... 1 !.gi‘NIX1 kilti4',Wag I ire-, CD <> ,s el' k. ' -<- . PN.... L____ .11••_6_ 1110 4-..,..,,f. ,i ,-4, I . :'' 1 ft - %II -,, ...." -, k ,_____ .r.Z1A%11( ii.- -, • , M dltf , 4.• 04 , IMMIMMIRIMISt %- ,,.. 1$11 ir_ ,t k 4;t. .1- 1:: I In ik hT 1 INA•IPF',FT&L 2 0** 111. --A tit?;% :: I 1 ' I ' 71 ,L,_: hiT,INAL ----Aw,---/ ElamairtermardassAll_Qk , i I P . ___. .„„...-____--...,---... .._....------ - ...-_t...,__.,_ _, .. ...._ ... ... .......... ..._,...,.... „ft-z ,, r Immo ),);4 / 1111111111 . ----r':'- ----- -----, ._____. _7--g'IN14.-4# --- I:, ---- --1-2 I - ---. • ----'411/4.' - • I ' c xe 0 - ilr# • 1 1-. • : I CA -. t 4;'' r Goj F .. .. :.... 0000® ® ®®®®®::::::,: .:. 11.1 :: ,. ., � 0000 0000®® ® ................. 0000 M® ® 0000®®®:: N 0000 ® LIMMAUEMW ®® : 0000 I ®N :::::::::::: i° Nil ®® ®N®® N NN®N ENN ®®®® :::::: ®® ®®NN® N ®N ® NN®®®::::::::: INNI®'®®® ®N®® ® ®® N NN®N::::::::::::::: N® ®®N® N ®® ® ®NN®::::::::::::::: INIMININEPZENNOMOMMIMMINMENNMEENNNNMMENMINENNEMMENNEMENNMNNNMENNME MENNEN: : : M®l •® ®®N® ® ®IN .;N N®®::i::::::::::::: : ®® ®N®N 0000 IIN N ANN::::::::::::::::.:. ®® ®®®® N IIN ®11I11 ® NIIINN:::::::::::::::: :: ;;MENNINIMMENNMENNENOMMENNENEMMMNMENNNIENNNIMMNMENNEMENNNEENENNMNEEM MIME:::::::::::::;;;:::;;:: i;6 # :00 !®® ®®®® N 11® NNNM MN!!!........ : + !1111®® 0000®® ® ISN ® :: +q- l �® I N® N iN NNN ITEM H iii ii:ii:::::::::: solae :;NMEMENNIRENNNIMEMENNEMENNMENNMMENNriMMNIMMNMMINNMNNNINEINIUMINUNIPIMINN=LI®N:::::::::::::i::::::: gsE3 :® eN IN®N® ® .>y I®® .. MEM::i::;�::::ii::.:i:: N' MI I®®®® N • I® •NNY II®N:::::::::::::i:::::: m1Q N® NNIM N Ilm i IA acts,:::::;::::::: ::: g 0000 '.�'�: � N 10000 N111®N::::::::::::::::::::: C !i IM11111001MU1®00 I®® ® N 11® ® 111®N::::::......::::::... 0 NNS IN® ®00®00 1 M®� NNl;S100N:::::.::......... I� a N®® I®®N® ® I®® _Illi'®� ! .l®®:,;::::,,,;:::: •::.:®® 0000 ® ® I®N um!!!: :: ;:::::: �� �0000 ® N i®® � �®® : : : : i . . ®�i�kgi I®® ® � 0000 fm®® ;:::,,,:: ;;1111 ® t®llt=® II®®®® ® 0000 -MmeSE :::: :::: :: ::::: .:••..... 1111®® �I®NN® ® ®® MNi:11INN::::::::::::::::::::: 1:::MN IIN®N® ® ®N N�.� ; :: ;::: ::::: :' ii 100::: 0000 IMMI N ®N NNf�003N:iii:::!i iii:i:iii:ii 0000 .I®��® ® 0000 ® J0000®':::: �:: : :::: : 6�® I®®®® N ®® NN;®®N::::::::::::::::::::: 4Ik® ®NN® N 0000® aMINNU 00®N::::::;:::::::::::::: I s® �NMENN N T MEN ............. .w NOM MEN::;::::::::::::::::.: IMMMONNEIMENNI i®®®® N® rt M ®®A® ::::::::::::::::::::: :;!!!!!!MMNIMM!®®N® ® ®N ®N®;N®N::::::::::::::::::::: ......... . ::::::®® ®® ® ® 0000 NEMINi®®N:::::::::::::'' :i:::MEE=M ® ® ®® NEMMIM NN:::::::::: " : I®.........ISN® N®N® ® ®® NNIe00®N:: :i::ii:::i::::: ®® NMEM ® ®N NN®®00N::::::::::::::i:::::: ::NNNENNONMEfflumm INN® ® ®® NENOMM®N::::::::::::::::::::: HUMME lIIII NN® N ®N NNir`'N®N::::::::::::::::::::: ::MENDENNOM,,ENNNI NENNENNEMEMENNENNNNMN.MNNIM 00N N®®®N®:::::::::::::::::::: :MMENNEMENNNI MENNEMMMEMMENNMENNMMEM 0000ENNMENNEMENNMMMMINNI®®N::::::::::::::::i:::: ::MNMENNEENNNI IMENNEMMENEENNNNEMN• ®NUNOMIIMN i::i:::i::::iii i::i:: ::NNNNIMMMENNI NENNENNEMNNEMEMMNNENNMNNM®N NNMMEN ii::::i:i iii i::i:i:.: ::MMMMMNNNENNNI MENNMMOMENNMNNMENNENNMONNI ENNNNENNMMMMENNNNENNNMENIMMMO:::::i i:::i:i:::::::: ::MEENNNNMENNNI MENNEENNMNMENNNNMMNNNNMNI®® NEUI1 IMM ii:i::i:::::i:i iii::: ,:MMENMENNEENNI MMENEMNNMENNENNNNMENNMNI®® mommEi�Ni:i :ii ;:MMENNMENNNEMB ENNNMMTMENNEENNENNENNEMMM®®M1NNumm�7"�rr o:::'::;;:;:';;;;;,;:: ®N®® N®®® ® ® _I INMMp�IIlq��i:i:i i:i iii iii iii::i 9EPE NNN® N ®N i ® M®ENWI_®®::::::i.: is 1ga�® inr,'Y ® q aom I®NES p lfNNOWNME,�9,::,::: ::::::::;:: 11® MI I®®®N® N' ::; :::: :: : :: ®N® IEN® NEMS NL11 :::::::::: ::ENNMENMENEMMENNOMMMWRMMMENNNMNIMMEMONN®® IW5lid NNEMEM''IJ ::::::::::::::: ;;MENNNNMEMENIMENNERAMMNMENNMEMENNEMMMI MMMINVICNNENNEMEMMINNENOMMINMEMPIIt::::::::::::::E ;:ommmummENIEBEIMENNEMIINCNENNEMMENNMMENNI BINf E I EMIE NN®E®®/ ::'"":::ii;::€:::.::: ME IMMENEM m IMN NENNENNNIMrN®001®NN::: ::::::::::::::::: : 00 IlN®N® M 1:9N N; TNNI 'I®®N :::::::::::::::: ::N 0000 II®NN® N 100N Ni MEMEMMEN::::::::::::::::::::: ®® 100®®® ® INN NNNNNiM00®N:;::::::::::::::i:::: :N®1N11N®® I!'®®® N 100® 11NNMN IIIEMME®N:::::;::::::::i:::::: :N1NN®® EMME ® I00N I ®ME®®N::::::::::::::::::::: ::® 00 ®®®1®® N 100® N NMIME®®N:::::::::::i::::::::: P-® ®®® ® N 100EA NMBMMN::::::::::::::::::::: I®EE 0000®®® N I CN IE EN®1®®®N::::::::::::::::::::: 0000® MMEN® ® 100 NN1N®®N:::::::::::::€::::::: ®® r[IFIEME N 1.00: ESN NNIN®®N::::::::::::::::::::: 0000® NNIdN® N g00N N®1IE®®N: ::i::::::::::::::: N®® MMANNE ® $:M® Nl NMIAN®N®::::::::::::::::::::: ::N®N ®® ®®i®N® ®NN uNN N® Iff.IPPME::::::::::::::::::::: ::EmN11NIi® ®'i®N® ® 00N Nuu NRI 10000N::::::::::::::::::::: `N FM Iri®®N® N 00N 00®N NN®I I®®® : ::NN C 00 fi®®N® ® O® - O 0000N::::::i:::::::::::::: ::Q r s N 0000 '�0000N00 ® ®i00 I NI0000N:::i:i:::::::i i::::: 0000® M®®N® ® I®IKCGflNNIN N®I®N®N:ii::iii::::iii i:i E®®IE®0000®00 ® IiIN00® 1i N®IN®®N::::::::::::::::::::: E11NN®00 E®®N® 00® IM ::::: :::: :111111 11111 1 11.11 : ::: .:.:..:... ® 0000N::i I::::::::::::::::: i+�: iii iii iii rr;rr;;rr rrr rr;:r:: ;:r r::rii� !ii iii iii Hi iii-if♦iii iir'f'ti iii 1ii�i:,iii iii ii i iii hi hi i UU ::, :i:iiiiii iii .. ®� ;: •ii ...........: 1111:... :. ::. .............. ........ ..,.i: 'iii ........... ....... . :':'1111::': ::::::::I .::::�::::::::: : NPI®Nr MMEN00 MENN a ®®® ENNN;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; ! NC00®mm0000000000 N 0000® -N►®00®0000®::::::::::::::::::::: 1 N®® N® ® N ®0000® N11 ®®NMN::::::::::::::::::::: 0000® ®N®® ® 0000 Il®®N®®N:::::::::: ::::: ®®® N®N® ® 0000® !1 11te1�t1IN N®®®®N::::::::::::::::::::: :: ®®N �®® ® ®® N '1'� ® N® ®®N::::::::::::::::::::: .......... ®Intl! N►®N®00N::::::::::::::::::: ®®® I®®N® ® ®®N NN 11i N11N®®N::::: ::::::::::::: .......... N1���00 ®®M®®p ® MMqpNM IEEll E''lM001 yp�EpMp�N�M�pE® :::::::::::::::::::: ........ a 0000®00 00® 0000N -N00N00®®:: :,i :: :::::::: ®00 0000N00 00® 0000® NI'NI�N11® ® ®®N:: : ::: : I ..... ralimmiplommommwmmommil=====ip::::;:i::::::i::i:i::1 . . :: i::::€::::: :::: :..... � : :::,,:,,,,,,,EmmmmEmmmmmEmommmEmmommEmmmomm=mmEmm=mmm=ommmEmimmummEmENN,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,: .......... 0000 ®N®® ® 0000® ®IE ® 0000® i;ii;;;;;;::::::::: !® NNN00 ® 0000® 0000 0000N:€::::€:::::i:::::::: ........... 00® 0000®® ® 0000N 00® 00®N :::::::::::::::: ..... ®® 00NN® ® 0000® N ®00N::::::::::::::::::::: .... 0000 ®®N® N 00®N N 0000N::::::::::::::::::::: .......... ®® 0000®00 ® ®00® N 00®N::::::::::::::::::::: ........ 0000 ®®®® ® 0000® N ®®®::::::::::::::::::: ........... 00® N®N® N ®®® ® ®®®:::::::i::::::::::::: a t ®® IIM N ®0000 N ®® ::::::::::::::::::: 0000 0000®® ® 0000®® N NEM:::::,:::::::::::,::: W N MMNNNNENENNIMMENEMENNNMENNENONNNIMMNENNENNEENIMMNENNIMMIINUMEMNIMINIMINNMINIMONNE:::::::::::::::::::::: MENNMNNMENNMENNMENNNENNENNMMONMENNMENEMENNEMENIMMENIMMNNNIMNIMNMINEENNEENN:::1::1:::::::::::::: MMENNENNENNNEMEMENNMEMENNIMMNIMMMEMMEMEMINENMINMEMINNIMMEMERNMMIMONMIENMEN:::::i:::::::i::::::: MIME BIEMBIIII BEM EMI®®®BM111® MIIM1111111MMINIE®EN ME iffilliffitillIEMIffiliii IMPRITINIMIM MINN llflUEIffifilla®®NEM'ii i::ii:iii:::::::: J msas�: a� e nIIIHIIIIIIIIHIIIIIIHIHIIIIIIIIOHIIIHIIIOIIIIIIOIHIIOIIIIIIIIIIIIIHIIII xe =ee�:' !$Bm°e3eer" ! II IIIMI"IIIiiIIIIYIIIiii1111■11111IIIIiiIIIN91111118.�� ..i'�iYIIIII d Em1an� i�nnnmiu111111nu1mii�iii .. .i...n. . 11111 !1!111! 1!Bl iii1;1:::e 111!l111111111e111ee in uiiii1111t11111Ini " Ill t IHIHIHhIIIIIIIIIIIHIIIIIIIIIIHIfllHIIlI1IlIIIHHHIHII!PIIHh1II 11 iiunwii �II IAiliii�ii iiRi�iiiil�iliii ii i� EMMM � IYIIIIIIIII �Rllll�llill�lll�Ii� 1ili11�i111II�����I �IRI - I� � � nan1 II / _ ii IIIIHHhIHIiIHhIIIIIIIIIIIIII1III1HIfluIH1HhIIIEHilHhIIIIlIHIIH -1�� 1 �11 � 11111 � ' 1, RII N�' 111111111111111111111111111611111111 llll 1e�allilll�lilll : � I II ill�llll IIT 111 M 9!111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 �ii�i � ��� i111 ��IIlI��� � lllll � 'riummtimunommammirmumminnummmitutimmumnams��� � � 1� iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii 1 : � I�„ _ '� 11IIIII ! fl' III111I111II111I Illililllil Ill�llll�lfl�lllll�llll IIIIIIIHIHIIHHIIHUIIIIIIIIHHHHIIHIHIUHHIIHIIIIHHHIIHHIHIIIIIII 1 u . immummumummumdmommummummimmommo \. . Q 0 Q Z Q U Q J U. Q a! W -.1 (..5 ...J J Q 3 S z W W w U w ID J .Willi ui 0Z 11111 Z z o1- • W le • - • 0 IOW,'i zl_I CC • - ' . I W III e 1,0 - At."-'" • - - 0 CL 0 (111) N 8 , _ .1*---2:7% rii 1111 Cg i • _. -, &zip M _4gi. M_ • '‘�,A ti W •• (I) rn .. ,--,4 0 K ig rg 41.- (r) v) • � I• p III A CD rn .•. lese‘ iff Z W le iii 0 CN r � -� Q 0ig )t. "" --....''''''"i .... - - . . 2 1 . • 4, s • < mi. M .. _ el N ... •�• CI) ,,,, O O O• _' • � __' I pc w -��� III W z ,; U .•... • 02 Vj -I o � _ U Ilr 1 2 � O a O W II a cz m _ 0 = U._<7:-',. Q 111M1 ccZU 3 lid WCO NL a Z mc7J FE 4:c U ¢Q 0 Z O \ ' a EI a II; 4 iii "moo a V) JOS ct-t -61cl Te Engineering • Planning KvLB Surveying • Urban Design Landscape Architecture roup Inc, August 26, 1999 Mr. Brent Sinclair Town of Oro Valley 11000 North La Canada Drive Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 Subject: Development Plan for the Southeast Corner of Lambert Lane and La Canada Drive Dear Mr. Sinclair: Enclosed please find a concept site plan for the above referenced project. As oualready know, on behalf of Beztak, we have applied for a grading waiver and have also y may areay submitted a development plan. You probably also know that both the grading waiver and the p development plan were recommended for denial by the DRB and were continued by Mayor and p Council to the September 1, 1999 hearing. We have also met with homeowners from Autumn Hill, homeowners from across the 10th Fairway in the Villages, and homeowners from across La Canada Drive in the Rancho Feliz subdivision. In g response to concerns expressed by these neighbors, the accompanying concept site plan was generated. Changes from the original development plan include: 1. Relocation of the truck access on Lambert Lane to retain a substantial portion of the existing hill. This change also involved deleting a parking lot for the restaurant. 2. Relocation of the drug store to the northwest corner of the site and relocation of the bank to the south to ensure no night-time users. 3. Addition of a berm raising the screen wall to 8 feet along the eastern boundary. 4. Agreement to build a 6 foot masonry screen wall around the Town well site. 5. We have agreed to work to continue to lower the site during actual grading design. 6. We have agreed to use the mature salvaged trees around the perimeter of the site. Engineering • Planning • Surveying • Urban Design • Landscape Architecture Offices located in Tucson, Phoenix, Las Vegas • E-mail : wlbtuc@ix. netcom .com 4444 East Broadway • Tucson, Arizona 85711 • (520) 881-7480 • FAX (520) 881-7492 The WLB Group Inc. Mr. Brent Sinclair August 26, 1999 Page 2. These were the issues we were able to identify and address. Though we have not technically made substantial changes from the original development plan,we feel these changes do address the concerns of the neighbors. If you have any questions, please call me. Sincerely, THE WLB GROUP, INC. 641eA,6)(0. Charles W. Hulsey, AICP Director of Planning and Landscape Architecture CWH:hg c: Hank Nelson David Williams W:\HEIDI\Charlie\sinclair.Itr.wpd TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 6 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: September 1St , 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL FROM: David Marsh, Planner I SUBJECT: OV12-99-7 LA CANADA / LAMBERT LANE COMMERCIAL CENTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LA CANADA DRIVE AND LAMBERT LANE—CONTINUED FROM AUGUST 4TH, 1999 BACKGROUND: The WLB Group, representing the Beztak Companies, request approval for a project Development Plan. The 14.90-acre property is located at the southeast corner of La Canada Drive and Lambert Lane, and is designated for commercial use under the El Conquistador PAD. The property is abutted on the north by Lambert Lane and the Fry's commercial center, to the east by a drainage channel and a golf course, to the south by the Villages of La Canada, and to the west by La Canada Drive and the approved Canada Crossroads commercial development. The site is still in its natural state, with a small wash, two small hills, and large amounts of vegetation. This development plan is dependent on appeal of a grading exception application, which the DRB denied at its June 29th, 1999 meeting. The applicant has appealed the denial of the grading exception to Town Council, which is also scheduled for this evening's meeting. This project is also dependent on approval of a conditional use permit to replace an existingutilitypole, which was continued by the Planning & Zoning Commission at its July 6th, p '999 reqmeeting, uest at the of the applicant. This item was continued from the August 4th, 1999 Town Council meeting in order for the applicant to meet with neighbouring property owners. SUMMARY: The Beztak Companies proposes to develop a commercial center on-site, with a total of 132,422 square feet (SF) of commercial floor space. The proposed development will consist of a specialty grocery store, a drug store with drive-through, a bank, restaurants, and approximately 33,000 SF for retail shops. The development will also feature a large number of sidewalks, links to the planned Lambert Lane Multi-Use Path, a pedestrian plaza with outdoor seating areas for restaurants, and several water features. The development will have vehicular access off of Lambert Lane and La Canada Drive, and will possess 549 parking spaces and 56 bicycle spaces. The development plan is discussed in detail below. Please note that there are a large number of conditions, as the applicant has not revised the development plan submittal owing to the DRB's denial of the grading waiver. El Conquistador PAD The proposed development plan meets all requirements of the El Conquistador PAD. All buildings proposed by the development plan are within the required setbacks, and the parking provided is in conformance with the 1 space per 250 SF requirement of the PAD. OVZCR he development plan proposed is in general conformance with the requirements of the OVZCR, although several issues remain. Loading bays have been adequately provided for the planned commercial development on- site; however, the OVZCR requires that PAD B have its own loading bay, due to square footage and distance TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 6 requirements. Sec. 11-203.H of the OVZCR does permit a reduction the number and location of required loading spaces, and Staff recommends that the Council eliminate the loading bay for PAD B, given the type of development proposed, and the current methods of delivery to retail businesses. As required by the Code, Staff has placed a condition that all loading bays be screened by a 6' high opaque wall. In addition, Staff has also placed a condition of approval that the trash dumpster behind Building 2 be screened by a 6' masonry wall and landscaping, as per the requirements of the OVZCR. Design Issues The proposed development plan features a variety of amenities, such as water features, a pedestrian plaza with a fountain and an outdoor eating area, and staff commends the applicant for the provision of additional landscaping and sidewalks throughout the plan. The applicant has made several modifications in the development plan since the last DRB meeting, including the provision of a small pedestrian"patio" in the southeast corner of the buildings, and has combined Buildings 1 & 2 to allow for a larger pedestrian plaza area and increased views of the Santa Catalina Mountains. The applicant has also proposed to construct a sidewalk along La Canada Drive to connect the development with the Villages of La Canada to the south. Staff has requested that several raised pedestrian crossings, consisting of coloured paving materials, such as interlocking brick, be placed within the parking area as a traffic calming measure, which the applicant has incorporated into the plan. In a similar manner to the Target and Home Depot Centers,the applicant has provided a trailhead area to link the ~oposed development to the planned Lambert Lane Multi-Use Path, which will run adjacent to the south side of Lambert Lane. Staff has requested that the trailhead area be linked to Building 1, and the Multi-Use Path, with a minimum 8' wide path, constructed to AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials) standards. Forty-four bicycle parking spaces are required for this development, and the applicant has more than met this requirement, providing 56 spaces, 28 Class I and 28 Class II. While these spaces are provided, Staff has requested that several of the spaces be moved or re-allocated to allow for a more equitable distribution across the site. In addition, Staff has placed a condition that the lighting plan for the development be the same as the commercial centers to the north and west and, at the request of the Building Codes Division, be submitted for staff review prior to issuance of building permits. Access/Traffic A retail center has already been constructed on the northeast and northwest corners of La Canada Drive and Lambert Lane. A proposed retail center has been approved for the southwest corner. There is a proposed and approved 80 unit residential community adjacent to the site on the south and a golf course to the east. The adjacent topography is rolling plains. La Canada Drive goes downhill south of the site; Lambert Lane is relatively level. Both La Canada Drive and Lambert Lane are 150 feet wide right-of-way. The intersection of La Canada Drive and Lambert Lane is signalized with the following approaches: Northbound: one left turn lane,two through lanes, a bike lane and a right turn lane. Southbound: one left turn lane,two through lanes and a bike lane. Eastbound: one left turn lane, one through lane and one right turn lane. Westbound: one left turn lane, one through lane, one right turn lane and a bike lane. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 3 of 6 La Canada Drive, south of the intersection transitions into one lane in each direction. There is a small median island on the south side of the intersection,which will eventually be a full median. Lambert Lane east of La Canada transitions into a cross section consisting of one through lane in each direction and a center two-way left turn lane. The speed limit on La Canada is 40 MPH and on Lambert Lane is 45 MPH. La Canada Drive is programmed to be widened to 4 lanes with a median and multi-use lanes. Lambert Lane is not programmed for widening in our 5-year CIP and no cross-section has been developed yet. It is scheduled for safety improvements in the FY 1999-2000. This project will include a multi-use lane only. A traffic analysis was prepared for this project. At full "build-out", the project is expected to generate 12,174 daily trips if each parcel attracts individually. However, when the retail uses are combined into a shopping center" a calculated total of 8,602 trips are generated. The difference between the two values is the number of trips between different retail establishments on the site. Since the study is concerned with access points and the nearby roadway system, and not internal issues,the overall trip generation will be used. Pass-by trips (are vehicles that are already on the road and are attracted to the site because of convenience): Weekday: 1,592 trips per day AM peak Hour in: 38 AM peak hour out: 38 PM peak hour in: 157 PM peak hour out: 157 fhe following is the existing and projected vehicles per day data for the following years 1998, 2010, 2015 and 2020. 1998 2010 2015 2020 Lambert Lane—West of La Canada Drive 4,200 15,500 16,225 17,200 Lambert Lane—East of La Canada Drive 6,100 16,700 16,225 22,200 La Canada Drive- South of Lambert Lane 10,500 16,300 24,340 30,200 La Canada Drive-North of Lambert Lane 3,500 15,100 24,300 30,100 The proposed site will consist of a drive-in bank on the corner and two small office buildings on the south side of Lambert Lane. A 50,000 square foot food store, a drug store and associated shops are located on the rest of the site. The drug store is anticipated to have drive-up windows. It is anticipated that some establishments will serve food. Driveways to the north align with existing driveways to the retail center on the northeast corner of La Canada Drive and Lambert Lane. The driveway at the back of buildings 1-5 will be primarily used by delivery and service trucks to the rear of the center. The two driveways near the intersection of Lambert and La Canada, and the last driveway south of the intersection along La Canada Drive, will be right-in, right-out only. Drainage This site is affected by offsite drainage from the intersection of La Canada Drive and Lambert Lane. Under .;xisting condition, all the flows drain northwest to southeast through the proposed Villages of La Canada subdivision into the soil cement channel. Should the site be developed the way it is shown, onsite and offsite TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 4 of 6 runoff will be directed into a retention basin and finally into the existing soil cement channel through a spillway into the east property line. Although this project is not in a critical basin, detention is required as per the Floodplain Ordinance Section g 1307, because of flooding potential downstream. Hence. the post-developed flows from this development shall be restricted to pre-developed condition. At the present,there are two outstanding issues relating to drainage which have not been resolved by the applicant. Staff's report to the DRB required that the applicant provide written permission from the Home Owners Association(HOA) of the Villages of La Canada for the construction of the spillway into the existing soil cement channel, and that the applicant address a fair share of cost agreement with the Villages of La Canada HOA for maintenance of the existing channel. The applicant has failed to provide documentation on either of these issues, and has indicated to Staff that they will not do so, as they believe it is solely a private matter between the developer and the Villages of La Canada HOA, and is not within the Town's purview. Grading The current development plan shows a maximum cut of 31 feet of cut for the hill along Lambert Lane and 14 feet of cut for the hill along La Canada Drive. The plan proposes 5-12 feet of fill for the perimeter buildings on the south and east. Both of these elements exceed the cuts and fills allowed by the Grading Code and accordingly ie applicant applied to DRB for a grading exception. The DRB denied the exception because the applicant did not demonstrate full compliance with the six standard conditions in the Grading Ordinance. (See the grading exception report for more details on the exception and site grading.) Citizen Concerns Staff has received numerous letters and calls from concerned citizens in the immediate area, and has met with several of the neighbors to discuss their concerns. This item has also received extensive coverage in the local press. Citizens have expressed concerns on a variety of issues regarding this project, including concerns over removing the hill at the northeast corner of the site,the overall layout of the development plan, the large amount of parking in the front of the building,the impact of traffic on Lambert Lane, lighting, and odor from potential restaurants. Removal of the hill relates more to the grading exception application, and will not be discussed here. In terms of the overall layout of the development plan and the large amount of parking in the front of the building, these elements do meet the requirements of the OVZCR; however, the overall design of the site itself is dependent on the approval or denial of the grading exception and may change. In regards to increased traffic on Lambert Lane, the Town Engineer will require any additional road improvements as identified in the project's traffic impact analysis (TIA)report. Staff has added conditions which will require that the lighting for this project be consistent with the Fry's center and Canada Crossroads, and will require "scrubbers" and filters to be installed on venting outlets for all businesses who prepare food as a means of mitigating smoke, vapours, and odours. 'he applicant has held a meeting with the neighbours to discuss their concerns on August 11 t', 1999. At the sileeting, the applicant made several promises to make minor changes to the development plan and augment the landscape plan with additional vegetation and screening elements; however, the applicant has not submitted revised plans to Staff for review. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 5 of 6 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD ACTION: At its June 20, 1999 meeting, the DRB voted 6-0 to recommend denial of this item, due to denial of the grading exception. GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE: The La Canada / Lambert Lane Commercial Center Development Plan is in compliance with the Town of Oro Valley General Plan, as the commercial / retail use proposed is consistent with the Neighborhood Commercial designation for the site. The development plan is also in compliance with Policy 1.2F, "locate higher density land uses and transportation-dependent uses near major transportation corridors". The development plan does not comply with Policy 9.1I, "all new development proposals should show design strategies used to minimize changes to existing topography...". RECOMMENDATIONS: Should the Town Council uphold the DRB's denial of the grading exception, Staff recommends denial of the proposed Development Plan for the La Canada / Lambert Lane Commercial Center. Without the exception the development plan will need significant revisions that can not be handled by conditions. Should Council chose to overturn the DRB's decision and approve the grading exception, Staff recommends continuance until such time that the outstanding issues relating to drainage and others listed in Exhibit "A" be resolved. Should Council chose to overturn the DRB's decision and approve the grading exception, and approve the submitted development plan, Staff recommends that such approval be subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit "A" herein and in the Grading Exception. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to approve OV 12-99-7, La Canada Lambert Lane Commercial Center Development Plan, subject to the conditions in Exhibit"A"herein and in the Grading Exception. OR I move to approve OV 12-99-7, La Canada Lambert Lane Commercial Center Development Plan, subject to the conditions in Exhibit"A"herein and in the Grading Exception, and the following additional conditions: OR I move to deny OV 12-99-7, La Canada Lambert Lane Commercial Center Development Plan. OR move to continue OV 12-99-7, La Canada Lambert Lane Commercial Center Development Plan, until such time that the outstanding issues identified in Exhibit"A" are resolved to the satisfaction of the Planning & Zoning Administrator. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 6 of 6 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Exhibit"A" ir 2. Reduced Copy of Development Plan iDeL. 7 . Plann7.11' d Zonin: A s ministrator 415t 0 Co . u 'ty Develop t 'a° ector / ti 4if '...0 Town Manager V \\OV PZD\PZ1\OV\OV12\1999\OV12-99-7\DPTC2.rpt.doc , EXHIBIT "A" CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 01/12-99-7 LA CANADA/ LAMBERT LANE COMMERCIAL CENTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN Development Conditions 1. The loading bay/area for Pad B shall be eliminated. 2. One of the loading areas behind Building 1 shall be located behind Building 4 to service the businesses in that structure. 3. The trailhead area located at the northwest corner of the project site shall be connected to Building 1 and to the Lambert Lane Multi-Use Path by an 8' minimum width asphalt path,built in accordance with AASHTO standards. 4. Correct the"8/3"numbering to "3/3" for the raised pedestrian crossing detail on Sheet#3. 5. The pedestrian patio at the southeast corner of the buildings shall be connected by a stairway to the parking in the rear of the structures. 6. The following changes shall be made to the bicycle parking location and distribution: • The 6 Class I and 6 Class I parking spaces located to the east of the Building 1 shall be relocated to the front of Buildings 4 & 5 • The 4 Class I and 4 Class II parking spaces to the north of Building 1 shall be increased to 6 Class I and 6 Class II spaces. • The 6 Class I and 6 Class II parking spaces to the south of PAD A shall be decreased to 4 Class I and 4 Class II spaces. • All bicycle parking spaces shall have a minimum of 6' clearance on all sides. 7. Indicate and label the access route to the well site at the southeast corner of the development plan. 8. The lighting for this development shall conform to the lighting in the commercial centers to the north and west of the site. 9. A lighting plan for this development shall be submitted for Staff review prior to issuance of building permits. 10. As per the requirements of the OVZCR, all trash dumpsters shall be screened with a 6' masonry wall and landscaping. 11. Where not screened by proposed landscaping, all loading areas shall be screened by a 6' high opaque screen. 12. "Scrubbers"and filters shall be installed on the venting outlets of all businesses preparing food to mitigate smoke,vapours, and odours. 13. Improvements along La Canada Drive and Lambert Lane shall require Town Engineer's office review and approval. 14. Dimension the dumpster pad 10'x 10' and delineate 50' min.turning radius for the dumpster trucks. 15. The following pads or buildings require dumpsters. Pad"B",buildings" 1, 3 and 5". 16. Label 40' concrete header return radius for all driveways. 17. Call out stop signs for the driveways. 18. Cross-section 5/3 shall be revised to reflect the correct cross-section with property line, landscape and bottom grade,top elevation of the retaining wall and top elevation of screen wall. Engineering Conditions- Traffic 19. On page 3,paragraph 6, line 2 of the traffic report,the last sentence shall read"both La Canada Drive and Lambert Lane are 150 feet wide right-of ways." 20. On page 3,paragraph 8, line one of the traffic report shall read, "Northbound: One left Turn,two through lanes, one right turn lane and a bike lane". 21. On page 6,paragraph 2, of the traffic report the last sentence shall read, " This local project will construct multi-use lane only". 22. The applicant shall provide additional and appropriate striping for 12-foot wide right turn lanes on East side of La Canada Drive and south side of Lambert Lane for the entire lot frontages. 23. Correct driveway numbers 3 and 6 to show right in,right-out only on all figures in the traffic report. 24. The traffic report shall address the effect of this development to the level of service at the intersection of La Canada and Lambert. 25. Near Sight distances for driveways number 5& 6 shall be delineated on the development plan. 26. The developer shall install 12' wide pavement and striping on East Side of La Canada drive for the entire site frontage. 27. All recommendations listed by the Traffic Engineer in the traffic report shall be addressed and reflected on the development plan prior to forwarding it to Town Council. Engineering Conditions-Drainage 28. The offsite runoff from the intersection of La Canada and Lambert Lane shall be documented in the drainage report and accepted by this development. 29. A new drainage report addressing detention basin shall be submitted and approved. 30. The drainage report for this project shall be able to stand by itself without cross-reference of other reports. Hence the following analysis is required. Hydraulic capacity of existing 5 cells RCBC at Congressional Way is required. This analysis shall include any possibility of flow overtopping, backwater analysis, outlet velocity and increase headwater for the inlet. 31. Written permission from the HOA of the Villages of La Canada for the construction of the spillway into the existing soil cement channel is required prior to forwarding the development plan to Town Council 32. The flows from CP. 6 and 5 shall be directed by storm drainpipes into the soil cement channel. 33. The fair share cost of the maintenance of the existing channel shall be addressed with the Villages of La Canada HOA prior to the development plan going to Town Council. 34. The proposed CMP in the R/W along La Canada Road shall require a license agreement from Public Works. Call out head walls and wing walls for all inlets and outlets for these CMP's. 35. A percolation test is required for the retention basin. 36. The detention/retention basin shall be landscaped in order to provide a multi-use purpose. Engineering Conditions- Grading 37. Since this site is more than 10 acres a phased grading plan is required, but because of the nature of the site, it is hard to achieve this requirement. Therefore,the portion of the pads that will not be built within six(6)months shall be hydroseeded and irrigated to ensure vegetative growth. F:\OV\OV 12\1999\OV 12-99-7\DPTC2 Exhibit A.doc 7 _ N 11 N N N tt ^� ro fl :4a '71 + w p o a 9, , P. , r i' r' onocoJ 0 U1 + U !" o 5:4- (� i orr 101 RRDi 8 ' i~♦ � � a; >AF+, tgR z$ fr�� ql > m> t�i iR �Fcga 4Pm> p qg Ais 7C ; hi� 1 HI A> m � ynM �+> -Z7> � � �_S� Z� � N-� n� �� U>WN� pv 413 hp : i b; m� SW A21 O (/I{Z,� .11 h R 1 t168 % nA -- . 1Z PI,vr� �,.�o-1. 71 t: > > ali 1c7= !^O� �o� � m�s v� > Ovz� � � G P b mm Ig t ��ow to�,°oul+�,�� � � ' >0 6 m n 0n F c tz p �1 z8��,, l/� Ul A S� ppppS+p s I.12 ZZIZ'IjI ��>p2 �� mf�l �1pm _�(/� O �>F � .y. j� �r p�n O�O � 2 fpn�N OeppONu�n NOOOCeU DUp� rPi g 7G ppiA h 9 'g.fp�1oZ g4 �N«SS ! S OZ Aa �1111jjh .".A O+l �o.. 4TMN m8 pdi OcN ,mi F ^� Z�r�1"� �/ O� ��NC� � ��m�I�/7sry,� ((��']]yy1G�� 2m ; m0 � � Z� X1011� yN >r� TT-1=0 PAI� ��+1�� �� NO�OOO�WD f+�, N ..: U 6 ;i n ;; 4; 4 x1.1 % 'A ,,, amf% Ag >L O 1 / Uf �Otuj ""s"eCr fel,s .Z. � , 1111111Orr�.1 � � 1 1 t 1 t 1 1 u >A 1 fy Oi ;n 1 >O ! •.20Q ~ N>N6 CtHO 4y mm ;1� N h � 'O > r tzci '18;37' 18;3�' ; Z2x"* y m�77Dm� ;,; 41Ummr M Nm ilY41 0CfA.t> N�Q �+1C of � �+ �WVV'D� g r' � $ 9C <Z•� > �O� pC< �� $Q� >` 'n"p j >r > {/� C'A � mU-. Nr� jn o p �mp•n �� m... OUZr... pZDZ gY nt��n.>D�11`1 Z'ZA � i ;ZD , M �� i _m 01 N p; i� > > > N"wN(/1N .1.rmoE [,F .� U D D m v 1 v z .dao Sad 1 e4g v- , m> A $o (144tH 1, 2 Yi 0, 1 !< !: 1 : �^rJHM n2 �6 .'1 68 p it: < > I no O >o�o D,° N � > O ZC) AQ�v �C •� ~Z 4 f-��I Z.7 @j ���� 8 ` ; Z A r" � f/1 � f.l~ A O �Z '�W Z� � y Ul 3 i N �1 >i p Op i z g o~ <, c . tP "� �i vWrv1 Zi z . a^ r� 2 A8 G O A A to \r 2',"4 > N o i A ..; 2 M ': i S i< m z [ v , 2; 01 _ Lt d I.a}.1 „ ? ;'°-a '°, 2 20 m; A 2 I V mG � � �-1 id 1 ; zT A121 O gasv'` ' o • F� d n z1-�r4mg `2 Am> , rm `^ 1 �Oc`"i d! p ,`gi 0�� m vl -� Z mA Om pm o Y v� , A O .i{4 O5 Z= is; tl �� I 4 O nn n mfg y 22 AN " r, A. 0_ . 0G IA m 61 M is; M gi L OA z0 6 -" _� �1>/I Ga� 1� 2 1 ,� A8 6 r Al.' 1 t 1.-. u O O 6 y 0 L o O W 1�, >m U 1. m> os 'Al.OiY 8 m D 0o r>- v, ; Hr in� Z� 1 m • E .! i j W r.) N _ _ LAM: - •. vG j C 0 �� �- -- . i .. i ' rv=;yam r�cY= OawP igx p. • ' 1 r= AN01 WI gcRWAy 8q - '0 ,3 lirarr 'el �� = 411111 III _ i •� Air>+1 O�� �-•11^'r�NqO ��,^ : 11110-10„,- 1 Allii..416.-„.-- .,-7"IA r-41111P%-1;-7 ,'•1 05 1.,, —_.,,,, ,„, ( '1'14 c'Sp PVIlla gl , - IKiiiiirliglaitir' MINIM I- %ffil_L-lk I 1.Ii I PV-iP Ao 'N,nn71 1g; , ' rAi_.... .w.C.0,- 7,4i2o --„:- • - pr i I f . i§44 iq; rt...1.;13A, 'L - 0 _ z VI L. \ rot it I __ I -.1", -11141 , Z yy��A.m.T LO " 4 rc3 I 04Aad 11E4 !1 r! ;,ilh •Vg6_ , r %calo A. c �I �_ I_DA '� r� pier L = �n g+l naph: � rZi r L = Z , /, --- �, -I = ��I I 111.C I L419 W I 01 _ € 1% , 'lm its A <_ m> 0 Fi i < i � c• i �- !1 . ii 1 1. I I .I • Qy►� z m• I l--, L.--. _:-.1.-- 4 Ara .: ,, ,-..--.-i AI----::' [ L (0 _ .: 1 i a b xEci 8,1 eV1M AA Aill'‘ ' '3'1 f * Ig;„'.1%-'a. - dilaVIPV 'AgoAl I 1 9 1 . a..'' I 7 I.:"'.••, ....002A ':'[' 41 - ' 1 . il i ' .. r.'`...i.Ztc--;.iP 11 \ „ , , v., :'1,r4e..04 ,,,, ,,, rm. „\., ,_,.. ,,I s:., „aPik g I iiiiiNIFA -,,,= , . ,,,, , cq .._. .. :_ ,Ili „ pit •,;_. \ _ Ai IFIgt:t,9.,.iirli 1p I N r;0 1 0 AE j W4 • 'ii 411iR N I `,. ����r \�� 1i•~ b,: 0711%1011 , .-• 51 Ads; b n p ii 4, (101,1 \ �11I _i _:-.F.=_, IA -�� LTi ( > c �i �*1 � cooy z / 1 � FA • A AS - rjg -�---_ �' - .- , I I g% cz rn Z= t� i VILLAGES�r�rC nr- 1 CANADA - - r�+ m O o_ t: N V IL.LAGES V I LA CA VADA N 4 S fCryDf1 > T y Z .ln ;�/� 5.Vi ' � y2 Z A o� A�� O .. L $ 1 r n 22 Q!U 6 U W i.,-. Z _. 4 11 . Z i �t R r'1 O ( D »o 2S 9 8 8 , Z Z= g O O A I C7 A r•t Q 1 I I 1 I I I 1 1 % m � A ; 1 4 ,_____, WW1 i4 1 '1. ' O ,m `e-0-''''''.\ 1 a k ! > , rAn Q� to 2 O p q cA� fA n 1 WI•1 i j§j l i i J m N N J 0+"1 pn V Rj A P m m o IA AO ' D m o O 1c7 m>t-n1> • v O W fD N J V�' (]]•,�(1 xi Ow pi o m�1 NOZQ Cy . r . D n l 94�S• on C)C0 7,-_, ? -- I 1' QWg• Orn n Of I/ 10 P. ,. ® I rOTt , \ \ t j b0Nooc >Fin i > .8 V 11 1 1 79,1 F-9-6 \,\E t5 R, 'x )4 V.• ?”<130 n m zm v 'i Ya' vvn© l.A�CANADDRE UDKmZ Gn7 O o Nmi mr7; D *Nm ma D -1 (-=_ cQn :z - y"y_Oy? � � N - rTi O� n D, vc m _F,8 y 8� �Z _ �m e; � vm F Nn A nZ A . r p Zr�* . ��Z f. (4^ Dv GG O m n >_, � .' ,•.s°,` - � N rNW� mCZ ' C � ppv - mCc7 o g 8'f. 4 _.* D v , / m Z � r z A m oQ � z CN' b �. 'li:.. 1�\ P2K'0 nncD rD z m r, DN o m O \ v r1m rZ Z � F n P7,o p ' Z $ .a.;.^.n- Dw :1.11 �m r mm � mm o m �� r , Rc w Zm<m . $ :ma .T 1 ik id NmDN �t~` .z • H Dz _, r cn ^ Z z z G DDtom = r z m • yI_. - . : XI z O O 0O mm O A = 8m' w' \.;' *:5•O . � Y O O vr2,1 m D. Z = .,06ID *1Z .. ` `9013\DEV-1.DWG 06/15/99 BEZ F.. gap X pclIal X= foelF,1 ' --- -------- --------ii- ---f-' 1,- .-- '--- ,_,,,.,.,,,.., ..0,42,:f.„_-::::-..:. iii rct'iilJ:liilri -- - — -__-_-,.-,._.-:-f ,_m:,„_..•._,.l......i....m.-_s_\s-a-,i,.n-bk--c-------__---- __.4_.\_\iA,:tA.gL).,........\•\CA---, DA DRIVE , RIVE 2 ... ' --\---- - ( 31ROAD MAPS P2)\ ---''-----'7, -- - - •,___,rirs.,.' _ _.,,, ':-;i ' I. IMIllill10... :::, ---.. - - -, \ 85'2 --tc....D---4111 2,r -----------------=- ------",-- --,. ..,..1111MP--,4111N111.........17-7- 7 -l''''n-- 13 fiec' /Ali' ..:" 4: :____:,.-..,.---mar-....... , ..,,rinimmimik''‘ .--..., 0 coo g•t g, ......„,„;-„-,uv S.-AO. 3 A ER r..„„,,4,01141&-..iii,=, giiiw...) --=-41,,--_.lirmow----:::_,--:__-:.ir .-.04*--.....,, ..*44m011101 ............--tt.,,t,.. .....:.:,______--z.- --....,,, .„- -_°* „r_ .,,,,,........,,, . . . '\". 0101.,. ' '•',., IMMOINUMPIllir,....- -- "eaKek.'‘,2_,_ IIIN1... 1,,,5_,„\, ..‘ , I I,. .• .. lir PEIS3-,F.1-2..:Parli Ili ioN r nr'illii 7141M1,1111011V4W,11)I If t , i, t , iymr... .wr Pm 1 woo ;,..6.1, .„.„1„.....- ...., .:, ,i.___.. 6,„........ , .....9 .., .,., . . , ',,k,..TA., .;',....., IMF'-Aa-'4,-,,,,l-eim'al.lt 4".. 4 . likei i A , A 111/ 1-1-WkosLy-) -----1 -' .-q1,4;AIP ,...,:, per sio.......i„, j i/1 iipwa:27... NV Vail ii mil i i: r I y,. ; •L. \ ovreabi.4741,-4..j 1,1111_-.9) Allre "-el. ; , 1 I trl riii P,i'-g: I- kt _1. is ,„, _.„... i 1, • hil . .4,,. ii k h it, ..., El '' „t5r01-24LINTITY Ap, 0 , Jil, ._____ ___„fflyio.. K i g_ ' atai- • Z , 1 1 glif ilci f n 1 li I 19p):17 fii--1-Wi:77-1 i ' !1 fe ,.., 41 r,:t. jiliZabm, wall I A iw 1,4.--,.. .? 1—' iTir— 'No "11114`0,401,' ,1 . . ..., .. _ •, .,) NI 11111 . 1V4 H i'Altai-. ._1.-IIM,i 1 5 I ti 111.1611:2 P1'0/C,Mill 1 i,1,1tr...1.a.I-_limi-- 1 ,---r-r-------.------.1 . -- 4„,-.----....---LE__1111111 4."1"4"4:':'&2011111,0111111AMArl '' 121, r4;970.7* trait Ili 1 1. iii , r` I . ii 1 11 ltagifilli PIG - ei - L" fr li 1.,., L4141110.4.1.119LIV lli 4 -,--Z 1 IF 11 -71. "1 a 011,. .10. II L... = 1.-:;;I:3004 li 4 ,tpt,. .,411* ,r-ii•cb,, igi)..4jr_4, 19.1,.... ,._ 1.7..s. MA. . si...:K. 4, rd, u I 4 ,„,,vali, ;wt.: .T„. . 11 112. iliL,,,,111 , . W., a.. L .....e.... -... ---1 0- ona p P Bira.T.1.11 C•:1 .... , r- X' 141'. IT - -ib 1potwiiiMp i , - 13-,A,AVIAIRIL. ,. k it. ill! 1W,,,AN- A.1._ ' 1 Ir#4_ 4%---14Itittl'• p i i iii irtitik.t, 1 VM411 Jill tagt:111 IV -4- ,,, ,4 A t-11)Til .1 1 1 ht .. p . 17, '' . z-lbeIririllif --t.11W 4131:14,1611=1115,4it''-'''' t-I'''414V1t4iikl. '..il - 1-1irii, mow% Via,Irriffa, 4 . 1 1 A I4 1.11.) Itt'.'lligi ' 1-1111k5' td,./M111:'-`4 •, ',:")-'" \\\,?, II ..- h . .v4.04S,,ti` V...a• ra",;-„, ' . ,-:,, v7-4!:•;--,0-is..10 I..; . rvf- t 6 A.:*,-* "."4 • .4' ',4Arr-Pd."71 I'''T ' '33' lig' 11 kill'IlW-- • jr/P474------11'ti,11,\1\.) it\ikW;,* ' 1110PL.,:•-•\''''- 54.*'':.- loti_ "`\N 1 :Illi ' A . fi 1P4,.. .riitlavj q..D , (------_, • plii wp (iwi;:-„,...-rigi ,rit vial, „....._\ cirigitt, 40-_06, 7r$ 0,1Fikl-11/4. 7,L 5,...rAl <1.J.1 k-,- 1 i •,;...,:4, 4, 11•NIIN k ' '-'1 "iP . 4 `4k. \ 111IL. ->tit/4\ \ -..:;iimmrga likllttiffrfr. ( "11. 1'. ,-‘ • - ,\, \, , „„..iiktfty0 ilit,s,L, -,: pip N-\.,, viitw joy._ 4-, ape,.7041, -----, :•••.st:.,;,4". „.1 ' ti. <..... .......:§4--1..\\ _ ..... - ; - NVAtilf c„ Al.--1-t-___----4--e--ig--77- - --- -----, .----ogmtl".1, 01-A g g 1 ( ,,A - 4 3 11.,. 4 NV 1 0161tal6 Nlitarvq11111MA — galISNANA41-KOMV,111111 i 7,' ' ,L. u 4 @ •, 51.„..,.... :____,;;_j,.....litErrito1441\tv\)):•*•tici, •, _.,,,...„........_imm, ___,....,,,.,...,.........,,............,,_ ....,....._.74- _ 1,1;,.. • u e.4 1,!,,,, ,................ r; 111012411(jr410,,_.0•.‘"-'-''' ii,...al.,,,--_, ............,,,,,r '' 'I' -------- - .."e_____ _____ . 9.,.itr..i.:PrII.__ 47. ____....„...,? ________4 g___.„,7__ n...)jil, INC _..---- ..._.,....„.. ,_„,..-......-._,,,,_,,,, _.----,--„..---._.,,----:,-_,....--.,..,,,,,,.i......------ .......ik....: 7.-----____ ---.......-1,-.......:7_,,.virr. ..... ........... ii, ,,,iiii...... ..,-_,.....,... _".,a,1- r---;____-,.* '''."411r,• --,;: PP'''. // ii• I , 1 ____ er'`'.., 8 ----,_1_,&:, 0 ,.---- • 1 ;--/-11-, , -.., \s-------s.:•-•-\- 1 i. zNin ,4 . 32 . . • WO ._ . . .-..1 ,- -iM - , g . _ ). i/A j - \r" '4 --. gi . -(. . AC dilliA , * A A 3 A ---------AvTe.LAGES OF LA CA'.:ADA t,C-0 G@@0g00 8 _ 6-''-'••::: 0 r-- 1. --,0119,• Ko< F,E6 t F..'it 4 4 4 4 Z a' ,Z,3.00 K>ri .° . i5? I-il q, 8' ,,.a r'l Z 6 'Ts, iii , L Wirrt.1rTi -.-.- 4 ' n.' &t7ri IN ii.:e-.-P 0 -1 . A-8 r.91 5• g3 33 r]i i gl i(1 g me,, • 1 i 11-`3c,-,-3-(3;,' ) ...,." Zw g- Ds.. ._14,-, 0A h_(); q1,234Z ;11 Eg--:,.•,...!..... 9 I T8 g 1,-}.1 1:1-, •,, q N\19901 ADEV-2 DWG 06/15/99 KZ • � —I 0 1 4D , A , _<i. lir-i- //. N O1. Qr- ^� r- / 1r. _, ' D 6,. Ito 2n9 2IY ^� -- N D Nn DZ § �y ;`��� _ / N "VITAo �_ I1�� o NnQ \//\�` C O 2> I4 IL 31 P ,' z Q 1r; M<_ 4 Nik -4 112;11■ N � \J Z y n i � vir'D R a nvi3ro a7 r O g z o r� y�Ag` R', z F 11 Z m �— A 8 $" n c�v \� L o"� Z 11 N 0 oOQn>� N 11 A� �. ^l 11 D N 0�n�:3 4 y p \� vI ,,,,LIT5 m D o,ii5N yD 20.0' Nr 1 ,s,1:, a 70< //`` NDN JO " f" nv1. /j\� ,NDN_.)., ;u oW D =AI O L` •O IC 8• 8• 4Do � b 1I— w � ,\ i 1 gm> C 1' _' C ii n ,�'.r 6'-0 OR 3.-0. -1 y g v \\N�\\\\\\\\\\\\\'NN u�; o ,/ r' — I•or��r--. 1-CLR.OF PROPERTY D I� F'-.:-7... Vit:'.- _. :_sem.. S A N (�LINE WHERE OCQ S y [ ..417.--.' :"' :•' ' _S 2!28.::.:.. 1+ „ . L. . ' .. r ''�.;.j, 8I I DN CONT e i. v) lial L` ., LW_ ._41 \ \/k N \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ lig A N m 0rn O 10'-e' +N' �� z• N 1�op i fN�1 g s, c) X p8.Z. UN ��N f�1 Y1C r� `;:ITN HP O a• V \\)t�x ti oo 0 l ''ia� q O1 ma m2 n�D DD Zi ,b,Ov. >DmOoR� i w z ww2"1 ln N › .1'.›,, 4► =, _ mF faiFe m cA I p cit. r z 1 4B 88 NOI103S d 1�®, 1 N_ / „,„z rn .. s, ,,,_9 —! 0 2 p �' I o m D 1i::I /:. IMF z7';cu , D n y m 16 _ u A u Q g • my r m 0 A rrl D 4D -4- ii q ITY)-- ,.,> g ?„1::',.:„.. 1 r_ 4 ,„:..: :-., a Fl. i0 u� f z D o° , \� „,.4 V ri a'7,1v III .- r'1 cp II ,.l� 4-Z , II • � m m I ... m I_ NN A m ¢V1 O m 0 00 v . rn t t O v 18 rrF. E C �AA ', / �ZZ SIN qN ? tiy .2 "'z 1 r_ i��+z 2 I �in I'1 g.-- ,q! m O� r OC{-+t' \ 8 j,Z n. Z O \\i Z ozA ig!! ,.., 7C \ > i yAyyo �0• 0� l! v 9 r01 EN '\ -21- jpc,O < T ug N�9,' rD� , N �D OC �Z Z Z rrl /` �?' 1 Ri 2�,{ _oma o O D C., E �Is, R'-Zrn- >m ', c z �)a cinm� ��Or _.op g:1,8C.. 051.-1 ",,,‘4 .:,..,:ii 0 i Z ,4 D D T. z co — f� Q' 1 as -_-0,, �rh •JYJ� O mOIAD yS,11„7_clZ ? Ip v '/ n NA . Z r=rorD' p rt -,:� O a U J Z o � '1 N.\199013\000-3.0w0 06/15/99 BEZ I-- -C ? I - c Coa' ID g W Aasr� 0 >A1'.o$" 3 �m3as� iglu mo=ve 00'a. 0 i f oo o4f 111 -- — ----_ _.- - -- - - 1 I.41111.1111111.1.1. II\ I, , I--- /,----...._ -......--.N c.--,_ i r°M-- i I---- r q - y - - - - / C - '.i . 1 i.i. _ I - I 1 1 I I I I \ I , D I I o jl D IT I I I • I I — I .. • JI I r A I I ',� - - 1 l -1 I I I I I I I I - l LK ----r II lc E ...N.- 1ling' 1 r I �. I D 6; , iIiii r )I ) _ ! I \ I ' \ 1 I I I ! 1 J 141. I - 1 - - I • I I I I G ± • . O )1 I ti. I I I i \ i aro; ----- I I c)� ----- ',,,) k\IIL., \'+' I 5 1 !I I I I \ 7 y. i ) II , 1 N , rg8 og• � n . _O tit�''8 0020111 1 O cn ()Can i-1, "98 �.Di' v EP-.2 AIT.0 r(.1 s v c r�r'1 cAi .1 2D�� Z E rn, 8- nD07 0$.-4 �o vOr \JJJ 'd��� li �1 D D ( WI )I, D ,. Vf ODv� � Vl po^' O' Nz t",-;f�1' -4 `%?)IS+S Zwm T S rDNo Il N r_- ' e Z O 4+ J *7 4. N:\199013\DEV-3.DW0 06/15/99 8EZ t TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: September 1St , 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: David Marsh, Planner I SUBJECT: OV12-99-7 LA CANADA / LAMBERT LANE COMMERCIAL CENTER LANDSCAPE PLAN PLAN, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LA CANADA DRIVE AND LAMBERT LANE—CONTINUED FROM AUGUST 4TH , 1999 BACKGROUND: The WLB Group, representing the Beztak Companies, request approval of a project Landscape Plan. The 14.90 acre property is located at the southeast corner of La Canada Drive and Lambert Lane, and is designated for commercial use under the El Conquistador PAD. The proposed development will consist of a grocery store, a drug store with drive-thru, a bank, restaurants, and approximately 33,000 SF for retail shops. The development will also feature a large number of sidewalks, links to the planned Lambert Lane Multi-Use Path, a pedestrian plaza with outdoor seating areas for restaurants, and several water features. The property is abutted on the north by Lambert Lane and the Fry's commercial center, to the east by a drainage channel and a golf course, to the south by the Villages of La Canada, and to the west by La Canada Drive and the soon to be constructed Canada Crossroads commercial development. The site is still in its natural state, with a small wash, two small hills, and large amounts of vegetation. This landscape plan is dependent on appeal of a grading waiver application, which he DRB denied at its June 29th, 1999 meeting. This project is also dependent on approval of a conditional use permit to replace an existing utility pole, which was continued by the Planning & Zoning Commission at its July 6th, 1999 meeting. This item was continued from the August 4th, 1999 Town Council meeting in order for the applicant to meet with neighbouring property owners. SUMMARY: OVZCR Buffer Yard standards require a Buffer Yard D along the north, west, and southern edges of the development. The landscape plan satisfies these requirements, as well as those of the El Conquistador PAD. The applicant has elected to utilize a 20' Buffer Yard D along La Canada Drive and Lambert Lane, and a 17' Buffer Yard D along the south edge of the property, which will satisfy the requirements of the PAD and the OVZCR. The La Canada and Lambert Lane buffer yards will consist of sections of a low decorative wall, with variety of understory vegetation and trees, which will include palo verdes, mesquites, redrock oak, gold trailing lantana, and yellow yucca. The buffer yard along the south side of the property has been designed at 17' in width, as to match the 17' landscape buffer provided along the northern half of the Villages of La Canada. The buffer yard will consist of chilean mesquites, sweet acacia, transplanted mesquites and palo verdes, and understory vegetation, all utilized as a screening element for several retaining walls. While a landscape buffer yard is not required on the eastern edge of the site, the developer has proposed a 25' wide buffer with transplanted mesquites and palo verdes, acacia, and understory vegetation. The applicant has also proposed to utilize the Wooly Butterfly Bush in the landscape plan, which is not on the Oro Valley approved plant list. Staff has reviewed the pollen and drought-resistant characteristics of the plant, and recommends approval of its use. In a similar manner to the Target Center and the Home Depot Center, the applicant has been required to provide a trailhead area, in this case to link the project to the planned Lambert Lane Multi-Use Path, which will run TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 3 immediately to the south of Lambert Lane. The applicant has also provided water feature and turf area at the northwest corner of the site, as well as a pedestrian plaza and fountain area. The pedestrian plaza area will feature a `stream element', which does promote an oasis-like feel; however, this element is in direct conflict with General Plan Policy 8.1R, "encourage water conservation." The applicant has held a meeting with the neighbours to discuss their concerns on August 11th, 1999. At the meeting, the applicant made several promises to augment the submitted landscape plan with additional vegetation and screening elements; however,the applicant has not submitted revised plans to Staff for review. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD ACTION: At its June 29th, 1999 meeting, the DRB voted 5-1 to recommend approval of this item. GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE: The landscape plan submitted by the applicant is in general compliance with the Town of Oro Valley General Plan. The landscape improvements proposed "mitigate negative visual impacts of buildings and parking lots" as required by Policy 9.1H of the General Plan; however, as stated above, the `stream element' of the landscape plan is not in conformance with Policy 8.1R, "encourage water conservation". RECOMMENDATIONS: Should Council uphold the DRB's denial of the grading waiver, Staff recommends denial of the proposed Landscape Plan for the La Canada / Lambert Lane Commercial Center. Should Council chose to overturn the DRB's decision and approve the grading waiver, Staff recommends approval of the submitted Landscape Plan, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit"A", and any additional proposals to meet neighbourhood concerns. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to approve OV 12-99-7, La Canada Lambert Lane Commercial Center Landscape Plan, effective on the date of satisfaction of the conditions in Exhibit"A". OR I move to approve OV 12-99-7, La Canada Lambert Lane Commercial Center Landscape Plan, effective on the date of satisfaction of the conditions in Exhibit"A",and the following additional conditions: OR I move to deny OV 12-99-7, La Canada Lambert Lane Commercial Center Landscape Plan. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 3 of 3 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Exhibit"A" 2. Reduced Copy of Landscape Plan F:\ov\ovi2\1999\0V12-99-7\LPTC2.rpt.doc iii ..).k...„ s Plane - ZZo 1 in: Administrator it / , Co unity Develop - t Director 1//Ill i Town t anager EXHIBIT "A" CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OV 12-99-7 LA CANADA/ LAMBERT LANE COMMERCIAL CENTER LANDSCAPE PLAN 1. The landscape plan shall be amended to show the 8' wide asphalt path connecting the trailhead area to the Lambert Lane Multi-Use Path and to Building #1. -9J c mm t . ,-.: JO .D Q J W U A w N 0 >m �� mom- m- v ,n ry m m IP N >A $> m= 3 r>- V, mzm A� Z 2% p o v m T, . .) AA $ < > v c�1 •v - m •> gi CC >� >L =NSA Cm -� l�>7� Vf>� An'V p�G1 (l r y ,VI h'" �1 Zm S<��f=1n <O4r$1 film p v .r= $Vc/OT1 2 2 Z9 D.2 Z r,'; dA 4,,v,=.>my Ak;g N A bA Amo N� A -, m O< r �O r F ({/n/ - A v� AAOC>�f pv+S1S> Yi A -,m> goY� p>rrm;n Crr�r�i�>tRm�� �o�> n p� AOO � �� YA ? r> Hp� O t,n Sr Y��S>l�r9ON L� �m O 2 �> !V, 1� 5 p> r=i01 V p�o: is Z> pgvi�i� F�gA xi >p$t F A 1Q>v z Ar 2 zU �A t:4uy R' {99 [ f.A i A20 AZ Z m ; 'ri `v7,, 2yy N >9 m A �v t�'J+�:� wj 2Zf Z �O� > _ �A=F O� G7 AC�v �n S 2 vD On m aSQ tlgi ZZvmi �� mmm f� >!�,.f,,m V . t^ gH, r�� X ',§ P 1 QOoma^ 'O TX m (;-..2 Q m r iV, 0 2 u 0, ;; P N D,7 ; =O �� ;cl m 0 m • 2=>m V p 4 Z� ,r Z a Ap= _ >O C� 22 2 m �Q7E9 2m Z-+ m>4 m x ><<� �� r>- , §� j:p ti, QL O j>V . nZ ”l'1 6 0 3 qi A 2 AM °' :1 Pg ,-6' P ',),*8 rr;,' m�g+ A v > N m A m no v c> m := o"' 1 A ;vg m =4�Qm om Tz Z ;o ; X a i i k 1 f ; 2Ni !c721 q P 'r; !g F m = �m in C A�p 4 -i +- nn- co F c zg A m m N ht A x i � p i':-. J . o AF ''cQQ z A kg M 2 isa 0,6 o i Z u ii c. 3 0 _ _ iAM�9A izioDA DRIVE ----ifil M 0091'•C..U33. 13 SO --.- _ ,-- a 1 VI 11 I _I? •• ..i , \ _Il ,. -.:2, rl 1 , - , lui 0...< . •] _ . ,-,, :); , s O x Jn vi 5 el _ . , , 4 1 I I f J i.. -- _ �—II � i_.' T og 4,4 = _ — Il r zo 1 _ . _, 1 _ v- . . .___ N , Z V ' r J 1 l z \l-N't_ ir ^lnwm_�� 1;!. N i m � xr I) ,om q;,A,z g o l h- 4,1 i ''"' P Zm ,.N i 1 o 1 I r, , so,, ----..„,) . ti$ I— — "s — — —— —— soow't !;ii: r� ICE ,. 11 191 • .„ co w 5 c> �,�I N< 0 n Q� g o d r : ; iNir4D = I\ ti ;, fl ls = m 3 A r.. r, E z it ., tE"� • gr- 73 2>N N 4-1'O N� \,�J E' W U N R v r ..,M i.. CIJ m a t Li "r x >a LA CANADA DRIVE iir ' �) ' i o\i r �� r 0 �� O ,. a. ��it D o a _ fD o a a o v�'.�.��.� 0 talo `<" 1/ ► ,11,.S►� I.r r.-- ..�..i ..I -��a.,-....-,[3:.,,,,;1:110-..71,_ '!r. �,... �E�►+L.,..-.iJ.ki� ss * 54111 ''•,.,_.t,‘,�" w l��CP117....r"Az a , ........7:-.,•_II ' , I1 A!!,.., !:,:;11,4"!, .t' `\ t7 8 0 `Gr „.4:::4,,,,,.,......:11, !Tin- III 1 ^SES "r ; mff£y;3 i C� O -' -• J.�rJi aJe: . < c•. j I 11 ..�o c< ggiS a ' rpl moi.; /,� 1 I••'. �. �0 l,' j �I �',,' LE hi • j .1 ! 1'= —I'd-s- — 4/11 ►< u ..- . O 1? el!t s1 1u i +," . ' of ., ��, j /r• 40: I S 1 v. r.r i� rifir w 1 '3 fx) fr~v iss � lONdU i• I --- / _ - ,_ ,. 44 44 .:_.L.1 -:__ c. t:.�._ ,,? 0,... ,-, • 1 ' I.j I ;,! . i _ is, II ' _; r_i: 11,1 ,f -4... __,.. .,, ill — A _o_ /` ..„,. ,,, — ii. " �, ' L; v� i /.; /• . I.' • I ' '-,l te .� � 0• j ..i\ < ‘: .'rti �,rw\•a . .r._ rcr•yr�:v." _ _ I � . 0 r• i a c • li ..:,!!, - let F, -4"P Ii g ..-0 vs; zp ,Iir ----:: i,' ... oi ..-‘, -4! -- : iiliii !.:!.. __ iill b u Fii N !l' ;; of DIE 4. _ •. /j '_ �, _� 43 m ,' ar• � # ►,i P. of _I.i 4.!•_ �'. d _ '''',.;..A1 .. . A cl - — I;,,._ ,;:,,..,:;•,..: ....,,e.., .., . • g'C 03 I11 7 ' ► — of i;i �9,11) `. 1 1 rs,.I ,As i "'�I ON lite. `1�� \h,ek �. �.`p:`�1y ` ❑ X11I�-� ►�� 1 m m \ \ ,sib [ �1 . , P Ir •♦ ‘. i :F Ng. ,,1 i•-y I r :•:-• ,',11I- MN . , , ‘,1)A -,-„..,<:\.&. 4 . '',,,t,..,"..::1 INI I'l 1 • ''''' ei 0.. N*,„ Mi 4,,,,,,-.„,,, ,04 ',,, lio .t ur _ A '-'. kw, r----7---- -.... , ' \ — -, --4,,,gi., ,-,1,i3 A v. Q NIP I r o 0 �-( 1710 0 ' ►.� x•40 �: -40 = .\�l 1\I O ®i a ," S, I. a s s g; ;i I7 ti®i a(1'') - •A O 0 "IS © (p;i :•, )_ . OC00000®®c 000 0000 O 00= 0©0©®00®0000.0...0 e 0 0 ®a r z -4 Hu>i C TZ Z Z 0 2 2 >>�� Q� ' > >�j j' y>O 0»>0 IEEI,ig ieJ A »11 3 rz, C 2 C i r" ,... ,,, iii">a,ii - ilthi . -'1:1 2353' ,r) A ; m -:41ill ! • 2R 11 I $ §.? 4 11 1 ,1,1E..1'g P i pAp � o� 17 >) - t�/ �" "" � 11P1= �A1 r� ' ' i g ' 4 re F � III v r<I m i O " O v = " �y. 2 1 -t Z V � � liql!ril A $ � <3m��i<�id <z� 9+� �J. �;-' ; R� z � K " ; gz i t !I! cI 1111 > i E I l i r i O i-#��,,..,� i X N `> > . ig. 8 '' *4 r i g A i w 1, i I 9 i co < 2 v ��> t Q n 0 4 p� 5 G N au��a u � NNb000.dm . V m O ((.r11 2..�N �p -1 1 -< ' I ^ > {J� N p >(Ji U U1 N�fA U U U1 fA lT fn N�!!�N�(!�N�fA(A N N 1 7-. N ebd i J '9 -+>a -1 > > >>> > C1 Gf 4l Cl Cl CI G1 n Gl Cl Cl r7 C1 n ♦ w ' U U U U U U U U r r U J~ 4i o u n c� c+ �n n �r,n �' n • N- \ . :J rye'1;. .as+A • • .•iY-.fit:,•Ila:»...t.' -14'..',7; • • i- - - .rte._.�_ ..�.'�9 y'�J'' --_ _.. MI 1<t' ----7----,---_____ r_ 1-� .; u CANADA DRfrt LA CAfZADA DRIVE 1,-.---:: . _—__.�. �.�' .,'=---- -- +j i 1 ---' __ L _' owl map \ f TR I I was i H o �--I _ ` - ' ' ,x, 0 ,,,•,-, .., — � 1 , ; ill 1 , , , , I — = gill; 1 I 1 ._-- I 1 11! 1.—_—..—__- 3I r ! ' 1 I I j ::,ii lb I I — —1'— 11F------.- -- -- II -� 11''I- 1 I i I 1 i ....... 1 %1 , mA 1 I1 I _ , ! , - _ 1,.1,1 l4. litk---- l i . I — --_1 ' iJu ' ' _ ' '' - 11 `_1 - I1 , ,* ' ± \%. . \ \.\\I ...M.M3 \ ' TT I I I ,1 i ,. I I ' ,-, ,1 i ,•\;. _ ---- ,i ,I1 'i 1 i .,�--1i•= I -- ' - i �l I I I(1:-,tat..1. ' 1_.- I I I 1 ,-.4:. k. i cr--Til— - I > ^" oit" —`�' ::,, A .7:1 til - -' I- i II 'I 1 or. 1, 4' _-_-_-_- .3, ..!::.. ...- 1-1--.. .,LI_I I s-T 1 I 1 t:1 isl ta ti :, v I I I 1 ., fir: I ' .:( ....:_t �:'l q,".''',14 \ � .��3 �L-1 ;rye a o o �/'T .._.. ,..._. I 11 , /�\ \ . mm 1 I I ',1 . , i�\� •\\ N. I 1 N i 0l I, L I `I // \•.,:;,i-• ;'- �>s a u F �j 1 I ..../ ,,,. 11,k,,,, ._:,.._ '-i.ii:: ,.._ i. „,„icig > I �,I\ \ ; 1 F 7.' -',',:,,,,__\:•.,.N -.�«fir ,. 1 YY"•• •:_.6` VA w N[Y'-`\ l __,a•I (I' f2. .,.:r,1 'i i -- I ~�� ~>'�, - -- '. - I tiff t —N I �, \<,..:H.... - ----- III i' 1 „):::-.,\\ ---, r. I • __] \ - -+..-- �/ \`”--- -��� - .... ---r-- - -__� \, / 1 Z.: N O . . J O. U t 4 N —- — 3n R li li fii5 1,111 !'' !"(:( (gi r,Y 1 I I - - i "g5w i -c.-, 1 ;,,,,---.. % -.1 vr 8-`5, ai-2 rIn'1; 4 ii 1 . ,___ . ., ... 1 , a__, TA i saygg.tA 2 lig A< g2§9 1 Vil - .35:i2 i g -4 8 , E lik "--4 aR dg d §5i° e i li,. §,,,,-.. rl 2 tg 1):15 1S A e 1 wA. It ri ;,i f,>">i� Rei 1 a.§1 i21 v2 mRR 1 0 St�. %.. `1`--J) I � l'..4"i 5 ::11 gym, GR_2o� ft>7As> g �n��i> 8 � pc�mi �n m v>i�i�� .�_ T m y 2 2� 8004!ANO oA�i r,m1 7 r1,1 O �� D > IT2 p % ,`Ig > >n 2 PAF 1%75, ,A fOy O �=vZ m 2 r ri f, 01 QCi m < p �. 1PFFE r1g,TfI ^ N 1 `- P,I2 mAAO . A A2 p• 290 \ Q Wit/{ p -1 a'1 tit: ittN///fff � 'IIm ORt N <IS z 2 m N ,, �i1,4 � ail? hi -,,i g 2:., tli, P 4+ 3 0m m ^' • rsiOn0 a Z A M z m 8 PI R2E1 m g 8 ./ -di D n a Od p 21 s L �_2 . 1 > 1 Z p1 R Znm ,?,3 > P r. -• J m3 ,e 8 "m� Z Z w N m XI i X I w q I ., - NEMINIMMINIIIIIIIIIIIIMI cc COM X'l i ti aiii 1 www N - l4 pil v r m AMA 2 A 1 i 4 I Z— r Mir O ; k r.,yt lal/s i A '1 ., . 0 { 7 r. ,....4 /., " a0 ..iik, r z o :,,„, / ' ( I , 1 xtZ.,'''',!':• pp r ilf L ( / .. 1 i 1' v 2. i:'r I , L --17.1;;4:_ �y ii �� • ,•. ♦ ��. , ��� �_ Asa m rit r r ,' . z — ci i -----t:. O ' tr.' i:t's'i;(P. .,-,! .,';' I (..A 1 '-- 14 ...., 1 . % , 1 7 q` t C� :i i) l. a In i 1 • 1' X '\ ' i :,I ,)i ; ,1 P .1'.' O #fi • ' i 1 . ik a$ ca ' g fii i.. ( xs V 1 z aQ',. , .,,, ..."...„.;i ,s,,, , I > Cv � e •'i ,.4 \ .)11 ► § '. i I Y 5 ois C z mz h3 CI 0 0 o„$ m r� • z� 1'El ZW �.waannasn TOWN OF ORO VALLEY ' 81i, COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: September 1, 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Shirley Seng, Utility Administrator SUBJECT: Public Hearing on Resolution No. 99- 89 A Resolution of the Town of Oro Valley, Pima County, Arizona Increasing Service Fees and Charges for the Town of Oro Valley Water Utility. SUMMARY: At its regular session on July 21, 1999, the Oro Valley Town Council adopted Resolution No. (R)99-80 providing Notice of Intent to Increase Service Fees and Charges for the Town of Oro Valley Water Utility. As part of the Resolution, an Oro Valley Water Utility 1999 Fees & Charges Report was placed on file with the Town Clerk for public inspection. The Notice of Intention was advertised in accordance with Arizona Statutes. The resolution before you would adopt the fees and charges detailed in Exhibit "A". The Mayor and Council have the opportunity to consider different fees and charges other than those detailed in the 1999 Fees & Charges Report, so long as the increase is no more than those identified in the Report. Should the Council approve this resolution, the proposed increase in fees and charges would take effect on October 2, 1999. At their June 21, 1999 meeting, the Water Utility Commission recommended that staff forward to Mayor and Council proposed increases in the Utility's service fees and charges and the transition from manual read meters to radio read meters. When the Town of Oro Valley purchased the private water companies in 1996, the Town Council adopted a Schedule of Rates, Fees and Charges. While the water rates have experienced changes throughout the last three years, the other fees and charges have remained unchanged. Since that time, the material costs for meters have increased as well as the Utility's labor costs. As recommended in the Water Utility Commission's Annual Report, staff has reviewed the various service fees and charges. Four of these charges require an adjustment while the balance of the charges may remain as originally established. Staff is proposing that an additional fee associated with backflow prevention installations be added to the schedule of charges. Related to the meter fee adjustment, staff is recommending that the Mayor and Council consider a recommendation regarding switching from traditional manual read water meters to those that can be read electronically via radio frequency. Under this scenario, the developers/builders would pay for these meters as they have in the past. In future years, the Utility would budget for retrofitting the existing meters. Upon completion of installation of the entire system with radio read meters, it is expected that the meter reading labor staff could be reduced to 1 FTE (full time employee) from the current staffing of 4 FTE's. FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed increases in Service Fees and Charges would allow the Utility to recover the costs associated with the services and lowering of costs over time. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution(R)99- 89 A Resolution of the Town of Oro Valley, Pima County, Arizona Increasing Fees and Charges for the Town of Oro Valley Water Utility 2. Oro Valley Water Utility 1999 Service Fees and Charges Report 3. ARS 9-511 Re: Adjustment of Service Fees and Charges TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 2 WATER UTILITY COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Water Utility Commission has forwarded their recommendation of increased service fees and charges as detailed in the Oro Valley Water Utility 1999 Fees & Charges Report. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff concurs with the recommendation of the Commission. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. (R)99- 89 A Resolution of the Town of Oro Valley, Pima County, Arizona Increasing Service Fees and Charges for the Town of Oro Valley Water Utility. OR I move to Utility Administor hector Town Manager RESOLUTION NO. (R) 99- 89 RESOLUTION OF THE OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA INCREASING SERVICE FEES AND CHARGES FOR THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY WHEREAS, Oro Valley has the requisite statutory authority to acquire, own and maintain a water utility for the benefit of the landowners within and without the Town's Corporate boundaries pursuant to the provision of Arizona revised Statute 48-571 et. Seq.; and WHEREAS, Oro Valley is a political subdivision of the State of Arizona, and pursuant to Article 13, Section 7 of the Arizona constitution, is vested with all the rights, privileges and benefits, and entitled to the immunities and exemptions granted municipalities and political subdivision under the Constitution and laws of the State of Arizona and the United States; and WHEREAS, Oro Valley now finds it necessary to increase service fees and charges for the Oro Valley Water Utility according to state law; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA: 1. That the Oro Valley Water Utility service fees and charges are increased as described in attached Exhibit"A". 2. That the Mayor of the Town of Oro Valley and other administrative officials are hereby authorized to take such steps as are necessary to implement the rate increase effective thirty (30) days from the date of this resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this 1st day of September 1999. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY,ARIZONA Paul H. Loomis, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Kathryn E. Cuvelier, Town Clerk Dan Dudley, Town Attorney EXHIBIT "A" DRAFT Oro Valley Water Utility 1999 Fee & Charges Report Report in Support of Proposed Increase in Service Fees and Charges Contents Current and Proposed Meter Fees Comparison of Installation Costs: Manual Read vs. Radio Read Meters Current and Proposed Service Charges Assumptions for Proposed Increase in Service Fees & Charges o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o W o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u) w o 0 0 0 0 0 Lri i 0 0 0 0 Lri 2 O in Ln o C3) co co co co I` O O Vn �t C\J a N CO (n (n CO CO CO I` CO N- V C3 C ) °� O N Cr; H W O O O O O O O O O O O I- F- H I- O O O O O O O O O O O Z O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 LUW O CO in (Cd- d- In Ln O O 0 0 0 Et CM C?) tt d' 'I' I` I` CO CO M 0 I` CO I` In N Lf) to I,- I` CD CO CSO 0) O J CO O I` — In I` C3) co N 0) ,- L J ~ J M 4 i- C3) ai 4 O N CO O CO (C Q u) Q co C7) co in to Lc" Co ti a) (n 4 Co N2 H H H CO In In CO CO.. CO CO (C) I,- N 0) 0 O C) CI N C? F- H Q Z U — + + a N CO CO d' O O O O O 0) Cr) CO CO J Q N T- r- N- CO CO CO Ln n N N (n LO L W W W �- r- C3) C7) CSO CSO N N2 O > = M co co CO I` N- I,- N- I` CO CO CO CO 06 Q W F- J H O J (n O r- — C\J LO Ln I` N- O CD (C CO T- Q Q W co CJ) CO it C3) '- co CO I` 't Ln (NJ CO CO E H — ti lC) cn I` Ch 6 N CO N I` Co C3) N W I- W O Ln `1" C) CO CO CO CD ,-- O I` V) CO ,- ,- co �t (n N N- CO CO O ti I'` Q Q c N C?i d' `4 7. g U et ••••••:. Cn a) Z O W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 nC 2 m I 'n Ln in .c Ln Ln in (n in in Lo to Lc) ozS CO 0 Q Z H C Q J CU c W CO W o cnC)O J ^• O = E E- J Lc) Lr) 0 0 0 co 9- LIJF- _ (C ti 1,- N O Q O N N N ti N (Ni_ oa = C 43 N W 2 (I) S N H O- . CU cill> Ce I- Z z L O• E T- Ce d Ca LL O J O C LLEa > co co Q F- r- T— r- N N N N N N cn Co M M o� = p 0 -11 W O co WZ — � E 1- QwQU (1) W U) II Q 2 cz c cv W 0 II12 C o L `*' O Q Z O L o W }' 7, O W Cn N Z C � Z c� II W 0 .. O cu co Q n CU J W W a. -0 c = = = = H .- ca co (� C4 0- c0 ca L CO C) O 4) O C) O a) O C) W i , () Q C d C Q C Q C Q. C 2 L L .0 C � c L' • o- aa. U `'r) co = - cv E E E le E E �° -°0 O O W cr) n n v v v v J I-- O W Ce C4 W - - - - - - - - a a 0 r- CV N N M M 't Co Co CO < O u) Q w W L.1 W 0 I'. Z J W W a,' � M z 0M co CO CO LC) co N 0 ,— LWL Q Q `CD co CO • LC) ti CO CD CD N r-- N Li.. 2 CD NRI O) Lri CO N irz O CO r-- ciS Q _ O LC) Lo Lo r. Lo N . r- r— NM C?) I-- (i) j E.Q._ 0- W0 u) g W V Z H _, • W > O (r)2 a Q- W O I- W g Z 1" N- CO N- IC) N in a) ti N C .,. CO OC) — p CO 0 ti O M4 — O O4 N C) U 4 M Cl) 1— w coM O CO LO ' M ti CD IC) N. NO 1— > re r- N. CO LO LC) CO ,r CO e— r N 05 izi: O 1— 0 W 0 6 tt 0 g-J a n (/) Z a J w 2 J .. W U) co 2N COO N O N CD CD CO CO 1 Z- o co O CO o co) r` ti co M2 f` � O � C� F„.;0 O W M N O O r- it %.J CMO N- N 0 Lf) oa O ~ tx ti 't M (' s ri.) N ig U) M U) C) IC) 1— CV. w w Z H J r- ,- N N Ni: Q 0)c= OZ j J V a � J — 2 aco re C1) W Z a O co c Z Z 72 W 0 .. 0 cu CO c -v - 10 -v J � 0 'v la - c c c c J - c C CO CO a) O a) O a) 0 a) O a) = '0 C Q C Q C Q C Q C > a a -p CO c cA c E E E :� E O g a. 0 c� = V. O L O L O �. O �- O Wuj U) to V) 0 0 .� v U O 0 a. 0 in — r- - & N CV M M 4 4 CD GO gilr!liEl qiimpi .,,,F::,:: ....„:::::,: L O I— 'L.)_L' a--� c� OO000 o - - o III W QOOo0O . O Q cn cn cti � UWi. In •0 •I • o• o ori U U a) aD :N � � o 0.. Q. U :::::::: 0 0 0 0 L) N d3 try 0111.1O W 2 coW1_000 © 0 ! v 8 0 p �. 0 o a 0000 0- Lrio0I0oLcicsi0oUa) �a� CL 11111 - O O a. { A : 111 LO N ' r < I- Lni ire)) ii)) L.r) -4- < `- < 1,- 2 2 < c M F-O O ON N o MZ ZNI- Z I- U r • 0 Q W N O O N QQ Q co Q Wc� ciaochc� ZZZLOF- FZ > 0 -J Q (!) O FE 1— Z Q � QZ � Q � � Q p ZZNMZZF ,_ Z Q U ti 2 cf) Cl) c a) O V Ce cf)� � � � � o Q Q Q M � � Q c� � cn � � }. CL Q co p ,_ ,_ N Z Z Z N F- 1 Z c CD C o TD > W J U a) I C O M 2 13 a) U) - U) O c -0 \ = -0 c I co O ° co �' o �. O5 a L co LO u L LLri CD =- W L a) L L L Q .0 - E CO '� V) Ur 2 U E p O E L O E N L ~ Q W :t$ ,� O O0 O �c O Q. Q L n W Q c0 : �� = a) a) _' U) - � *E .n o 't c (X co = a) o a) C U W CO — a) O o0 `e co O 4- W C� co 0 E LL I� Q. c 2 c c o o 00 '- 1- Zv- W in o .0 °' o o •� en � -° � UaU� © � = o II co W U t r) a) a1 .... O. _ _ c N W > N N a) 5 - a) +_, U) 0 (I) o E} a) >- LL c6 cn C C LL c ' 0 >, 0 = c Z O O OV II O II CO ,. II O W D p W w o o civ � � a) � � � o - � 0 � � U U Q a) � � o � U U cx J v a) Na) a c (3- p 0 a_ II II II II II a) 0 U O Q O E W W Q) a) 24_, a) 3 a) Q L L L L L L-- _ a- EL u) 0 - .� E c � o c) Oso _o .o � .0 > ? c 0t) O W ° c ° > CO a) OQQ. a zn n2 EU = 0mO0n Q Oro Valley Water Utility Assumptions: Proposed Fee Increases—Other Services Assumptions used in determining costs to provide services: New Service Establishment Fee CSR I handles phone call, completes paperwork, data entry, filing, forwards to USO I for turn on. CSR I = 15 min. USO I= 1 hr. 5 min. (inc. travel time) Service Reconnection Fee CSR II processes delinquent account (phone calls, prints bills, accepts payments, prepares turn off notice) and forwards work orders to USO I for turn off. USO I turns water off and back on after payment has been received. CSR II = 15 min. USO I= 1 hr.5 min. (inc. travel time) Service Reconnection Fee (after 5PM) Same as Service Reconnection Fee with exception that USO I is paid time + one half with a minimum 2-hour call out pay feature. Meter Re-Read Fee CSR I handles phones calls (before & after), writes work order and/or verbally notifies USO I. USO I reads meter. CSR I= 15 min.USO I= 1 hr.5 min. (inc. travel time) Insufficient Funds/Return Check Fee Accountant receives returned check from bank & processes in finance dept., forwards to CSR II. CSR II debits account, provides written notice to customer, follow-up. Bank of America charges $2.50 per item. Accountant=30 min. CSR II= 30 min. Customer Security Deposit No costs are incurred. Security deposit is automatically billed on first bill and held as insurance for non-payment. Refunded after 1 year plus 5%interest. Hydrant Meter Deposit(Equipment) Deposit is for fire hydrant meters used for construction water in the event the meters are damaged, lost or stolen. In addition, the customer would be charged a security deposit for non- payment of account. Both the hydrant meter deposit and the security deposit will be refunded when the meter is returned plus 5% interest. Delinquent Payment Fee No costs incurred. Fee is to encourage timely payment of water bills. Backflow Prevention Installation Permit USO III coordinates with contractor installing device, visits site to inspect installation and verify that device and installation meets Town specifications. If work is in order, USO III unlocks meter and begins water service. After initial testing results are received, USO III updates backflow data base. USO III= 1.5 hrs. (inc. travel time) Jun-08-99 10: 28A 0110 VALLEY TOWN ATTORNEY 520 297 3927 P .05 9_511 CITIES AND TOWNS Note g Title 9 tltrtrtut lay with trspect thereto. Cit~ of ordinances are designed to benefit the public at Scottsdale V. Municipal Court of City ofTempt: large and result in a benefit to the municipality (1462) 90 Ariz. 3'13 fill P.2d 6.37. which is "equitable and reasonable- in light 01 A municipality may require installation of t'et- the atttnttnt expended by the municipality. Op. rulittiii t devices for 'sates'backllnw prevention. Attv.Gett. Nu. 190.034. even though the municipality failed to enforce 12. Contracts to supply, water ,itttilac ordinances in the: past. tip.Attv.rrtt. Nu. 15+0-034. C:nttttac1 between city and desekiper of t'esi. dcnttal subcli•isi+>t► t t ovidinp- for water cttpply 10. Television translator system was not void hum its inception. bitt Only to H tr)r��,'."i tt:t,t�latc,, -nctcm has been grant- extent that such contract itn!,inged upon tights cd a cit tilitate of public convenience and neves- of water utility to provide. pursuant to certili- site• as a public by tilt corporation corn- tate•of convenience arid necessity. water to part mission. facility tumid he acquited by city got- cit arra covered tender the contract. Slade Vic• et utlient hurt only after- a ..ittccesslul election to Water Co. Ittc. v.City_ of Phoenin(App. 1914(1) tender § 4-514- it facility was operated as a 127 4117. 42. 017 1.2d 1138 p,iv:its. concern. cite crekd purchase it r+ttirivht without such an election. t.tp.Attv.(,icti.No. 65- 13- Eminent ttuusaltt--In general ;9-L. Sre. also. Notes ul Decisions lullyss ittg § 9- ('itc government could for benefit 'it citizens 516. +"t .i,r0,ttttttitt. :lscttme operation vl "!ringLit• ltatcl tight at any troth to acquire. either 1Clt�ii�+t+t,,t,t,l'ttr„ .‘�t.�!lt and snake:t un-t"its by mutual atgt dement or 1)v r.ondcmnation. err- . change to all:it� ei.e,t�imrr{.to he included with tirlcate nl convenience ,testi necessity held by mttntltlt ~dater. sewer. and gat hnFy. c:hur,c;. %v('i utility for residential scthdic isott develop- Op.Atti-.(icts. No..6.;:-.19-L. • uncut in comity in which the city was located. City could appropriate tar muttev to install Seride Vistas NVatet Co.. Inc. v. City of Phoenix and maintain u ttatttslatot' lelcvicinn system it tnpp. false)► 127 42. till P.2d approved by a_special election of the registered City of Tucson has been granted the power of yvtrts of the its UtJ.Attv.t;+gin. No. 57-I12. eminent domain by tctetuts of its charter and of 11. Water-1n general this section and ai 9-516. 12-1111. stud 12 Action b` city in taking water company's 1 1 1 2. Citi'ens Utilities Water Co. v. Supet ivt ret t.rttt:s.�utnc•of which carer outside city anti (-(tort Its and rut Pima County 1.1972) 1113 Ariz. properties. ?'Th.497 1'.2d 53.critiuruti denied 93 S.('1.462.did not serve rite's citszrnc, was teat att'l'ilt at-v. where it was desirable that city have a -mot!). 40V I;.ti. 1022, 34 L.id.Id 314. p('litatt concept"ofand control of csattet. 14. pul,lic use. eminent domain and to "beet tip- Cite pt otection by haying an integrated water system tlttuughottt the area. Untrammeled tight to use property to he con- and to have control of construction and leprose dpmncd is nut cruet ion of whether use in be of utility facilities its areas It potential ttrucc tit. made is a public one. Citizens Utilities Wales' and to book up water company s facilities with Co. v. Superior Court In and For Pima County city's so as to equalize supply acid demand id (19•72) 108 Ariz. 296. 497 rid 55. certiorari diltrtrttt areas. and natural future growth ui denied 93 S.t.:t. 462. 409 11.5. 1022. 34 L.Ed.2d city would eventually require all of water c-nm- 414. party's properties. Citizens Utilities Water Co. v. Superior Court In and I or Pima Cuuttty 15• Water, eminent domain (1972) 11)8 Ariz. 296. 497 P.2d 55. certiorari A city, in condemning a water company's denied 93 S.Ct. 462. 409 U.S. 11)22. 14 L.Ed.2d prom ttrs. may anticipate its future growth. 314. Citizeti5 Utilities Water Co. v.Superior emelt In A municipality may require installation of wa- and For Pinta County(1972) 108/%t'iz. 296, 497 ter backflow prevention devices and may pay P.2d 53.certiorari denied 93 S.Ct.462.409 U.S. for and install such devices, so long as the 1022. 34 L.Ed.2d 314. § 9-511.01. Water and wastewater business: rates: procedures A. A municipality engaging in a domestic water or wastewater- business shall nut increase any water ur wastewater rate or rate component, fee or service charge without complying whit the following: 1. Prepare a written report or supply data supporting the increased tate or rate component, fee or service charge. A copy of the report shall be made 254 • �� .. • Jun-Y8-Yg 1O: 29A ORO VALLEY TOWN ATTORNEY S20 297 3927 P .06 S UTILITIES; MUNICIPAL OWNERSHIP § 9-512 �- Cavh.3tls a.ble to the public by filing a copy in the office of the clerk or the„( municipality goVerning hoard at least thirty days prior to the public hearing 77. described in paragraph 2 til this subsection. notice 2. Adopt • of intention b�. motion at a regular council meeting to.� water rates or rate components. fee or service charge increase water or wasted proposeincrease which shall be held and set a date for a public hearing on the pru P not less than thirty days after adoption ol the notice of intention. A copy of the T the date, time and place of such heating shall be .; notice til intention showing circulation within the boundaries published otic time in a newspaper of general hearing date. nisi dilly not less than twenty days prior to the public u1 thestilt municipality B. After holding, the public bearing, the ttuverning body mai adopt. by resolution. the proposed rate or rate component. fee ur service ordinance or charge increase for any lesser increase. C. ;Votwlth standipu § 19-142, subsection B, the increased rate or rate e component, fee or service charge shall become elective thirty days alter . adoption of the ordinance of resolution. Addc:cl l)V Laws 1992. ch. 257. 4 1. Historical and Statutory Notes 9t:h. 257. § pr vides: and ,A.1•t vire 01aq q:es utkpptcd after the effective L�tw ly 2... 2. •• ..��•�..�. APPi,cahility cJ,tti� of this act. "The pro isinns of thin act apply only to water and wastewatrt rams and edit componeut3.Ices § 9-512. Issuance or bonds; service rates land all purposes provided in § 9- A. The municipal corporation, ot' any 51 I, may issue and sell bonds bearing interest not to exceed cline per cent per annum. - ui• enterprise or public improvement has been purchased B. When the rP constructed by means derived from the sale of.bunds, the municipality shall Eix • red ion•service to the public as nearly as practicable so as to pay the rates c.hd g the interest and not less than three per cent per annum on the principal of the bonds. in excess of the expense of maintenance and operation. Amended by Laws 1970. Ch. 89. § 2. elf. April 27, 1970. Historical and Statutory Notes is the intent nt this act to core with the serious y Source: r nblem of rising interest rates which Laws 1921. Ch. ;1.§ 1 have as a consequence made various types cel Rt-v.Cudr 1928. § 4U9. bonds unmarketable. The enactment of this bill Laws 1933. Ch. 77. § I. will permit the state and its political subdivi- t;ode 1939. a 16-602. siutts to continue to market its bonds when required and thrc r[orc allow the Mate and its Laws icJ7l�. Ch. 89. 4 I provides: opportunity subdivisions the Iv Sect, maccc- tion I. Legislative Intent taut itself in a proper manner." Crus References Financing utilities by the issuance of bonds. see 4 9-521 et seq. 255 49 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: September 1St , 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: David Marsh, Planner I SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING — ORDINANCE NO. (0)99- 45 ,OV9-99-51 PARCEL # 224-24-0120 AND PARCEL #224-24-0130,TRANSLATING AND REZONING RECENTLY ANNEXED LAND KNOWN AS THE HALLAQ PROPERTIES, FROM PIMA COUNTY CB-1, TR, AND CR-2 TO ORO VALLEY C-2, R-6, AND RI-10, WITH CONDITIONS, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LAMBERT LANE AND LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD—CONTINUED FROM AUGUST 4m , 1999 BACKGROUND: In August 1998, pursuant to Section 9-471B of the Arizona Revised Statutes, the Town of Oro Valley Mayor and Council annexed the area known as Map 4. The Town is required to change, or "translate" the zoning on the annexed properties from Pima County zoning designations to the closest comparable Oro Valley zoning designation. The attached maps identify the location of the parcels of land owned by the Hallaq family, the zoning designations under the County zoning, and the proposed translational zoning designations. The property is located at the northeast corner of Lambert Lane and La Cholla Boulevard. This item was continued from the August 4th Town Council meeting at the applicant's request to permit them to meet with third parties regarding the translational zoning. SUMMARY: In accordance with State Statutes, the Town should translate Pima County's zoning designations for the Hallaq properties,to Oro Valley's closest equivalent designations. The translational zoning designations are: • CB-1 (Commercial)to C-2 (Commercial): 10 acres • TR(Multi-family residential/offices)to R-6 (Multi-family residential/offices): 20 acres • CR-2 (single family residential)to R1-10 (single family residential): 50 acres While the applicant and Staff have agreed to the general zoning designations for the translation, there were earlier disagreements on several significant issues. These relate to proposed time limits for the translational zoning designation, specific development conditions to be placed on the property, and certain legal questions which needed to be resolved by the Town Attorney. Staff has met with the applicant and has resolved the majority of these issues. Meetings with the neighbors by Staff and the three Planning & Zoning Commission meetings have outlined several concerns, including intensity of development immediately adjacent to Canada Hills, height issues, and the type of uses on-site. While the uses allowed on the property must be translated to the nearest Oro Valley zoning quivalent, and are essentially `fixed', Staff and the property owner's representative have agreed on a proposal that restricts the intensity of development on portions of the site, and moves the more controversial TR-to-R-6 translational zoning designation away from Canada Hills. This is summarized in the attached map illustrating the TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 4 proposed translational zoning designations. The CR-2 designation would be translated to R1-10, with conditions, these being a minimum lot size of 16,000 square feet, with a lot reduction option to a minimum lot size of 12,000 square feet. This minimum lot size will match that of the existing homes to the north, while allowing the property owner some flexibility in developing the site. It is important to note that the lot reduction option requires a lower overall density of 2 dwelling units per acre (DU/ac), versus approximately 2.3 DU/ac under County CR-2, and will result in an increase in open space preservation through clustering. The remaining TR area along La Cholla would be translated to R-6, with a restriction in density to a maximum of 12.5 DU/ac. The TR area along Lambert Lane would also be translated to R-6, and the applicant has proposed a maximum density of 18 DU/ac for this section of the property. The CB-1 area will be translated to C-2, with no increase in land intensity. The above proposal will result in an overall decrease in density from the zoning designations in Pima County. The decrease in density for the various designations is summarized below: County Zoning Density OV Zoning Density CB-1 Commercial N/A C-2 Commercial N/A 10 acres 10 acres (no change) TR 44 DU/ac R-6 Multi-Family/Offices 18 DU/ac 20 acres@44DU/ac 20 acres @ 18 DU/ac CR-2 Residential +/-2DU/ac R1-10 Residential +/-2DU/ac 60 acres @+/-2 DU/ac 60 acres @+/-2 DU/ac OVERALL: 12.5 6.0 DU/ac DU/ac Because all the uses are permitted on the property, involve the same quantity of land, and the intensity of uses will not increase, these actions are deemed not to be a `rezoning', but a valid component of the translational zoning process. The Town Attorney has reviewed the legality of this translational zoning proposal, and has given his consent. There are two outstanding issues which remain. The first is a proposed time restriction on the CB-1 to C-2 Commercial translation. Staff has recommended that a time limit of five years be placed on this designation,which would revert to R1-144 zoning if construction did not commence on an approved development plan. The rationale behind this recommendation is that the C-2 zoning is not in conformance with the General Plan Land Use designation of Low Density Residential (1.3 to 2.0 DU/ac) for this site. Staff would be amenable to an additional five year extension on this zoning designation if the General Plan designation has been updated to a Community Commercial designation at that time. The owner's representative disputes this condition, and this issue has not been resolved in several meetings with Staff. The second outstanding issue regards the maximum density limit on the TR-to-R-6 portion of the land along • ambert Lane. As stated above,the applicant has proposed a maximum density of 18 DU/ac for this area; however, -ane Planning & Zoning Commission has recommended to restrict the density of this area to a maximum of 12.5 DU/ac, which is in conformance with the maximum allowed under R-6 zoning in the Town. By restricting the TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 3 of 4 maximum density to 12.5 DU/ac, the overall density for the site would decrease from the applicant's proposal of 6.0 DU/ac to 4.625 DU/ac. The applicant's rationale for their position on both of these issues is outlined in the attached letter from the owner's representative. Several members of the public expressed concerns over the translational zoning process for this case at the Planning & Zoning Commission meeting on July 6th , 1999. Adjacent neighbors expressed concern over the amount of grading which could occur on site, and the potential destruction of the washes present on the property. It is important to note that there is significantly less potential for grading in Oro Valley, with the 6' maximum cut and fill regulations under the Grading Ordinance, versus the grading standards under Pima County, which has no maximum limit for cut and fill. Moreover, the Town has more restrictive wash and riparian habitat preservation requirements than the County, which are issues reviewed during the development review process, not the translational zoning process. One member of the public expressed concern that the neighbors were not involved in meetings with the property owners regarding this translational zoning. While no members of the public were invited or present at these meetings between Staff and the property owner's representatives, Staff has endeavoured to ensure that the neighbor's concerns have been addressed within the confines of the translational zoning process. This item was continued from the August 4th Council meeting at the request of the applicant to meet third parties in regards to the translational zoning. Staff has not received any information from the applicant's representatives as to whether any meetings have taken place. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION ACTION: 3n April 6th, 1999, the Planning & Zoning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval of this item. The Commission added a density limit of 12.5 DU/ac to the eastern R-6 zoning designation, whereas Staff had originally proposed a maximum of 18 DU/ac. Staff concurs with the Commission's recommendation. GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE: This property is not in conformance with the Town's General Plan land use map. The land use category for this area is Low Density Residential (1.3 to 2.0 DUA) which does not comply with the proposed translational zoning designations of C-2 and R-6, with conditions; however, the current Pima County CB-1, TR, and CR-2 zoning designations existed prior to the property being annexed into the Town. RECOMMENDATIONS: Although Staff has no evidence that meetings have occurred between the applicant and third parties, Staff recommends approval of this item, as all elements of the translational zoning process have been addressed. All other issues can be resolved in the development review process. Staff recommends approval, subject to all applicable development standards of the C-2, R-6, and R1-10 Oro Valley zoning districts, with the conditions listed in the Ordinance. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to approve Ordinance No. (0)99-45 , OV9-99-51, translating zoning of Parcel # 224-24-0120 and Parcel # 224-24-0130, the Hallaq Properties, from Pima County CB-1, TR, and CR-2 to Oro Valley C-2, R-6, and R1- 10, and all applicable development standards of those Oro Valley zoning districts shall apply thereto, with the conditions listed in the Ordinance. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 4 of 4 OR I move to approve Ordinance No. (0)99-45 , OV 9-99-51,translating zoning of Parcel # 224-24-0120 and Parcel # 224-24-0130, the Hallaq Properties, from Pima County CB-1,TR, and CR-2 to Oro Valley C-2,R-6, and R1- 10, and all applicable development standards of those Oro Valley zoning districts shall apply thereto,with the conditions listed in the Ordinance, and the following additional conditions: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ordinance No. (0)99- 45 . 2. Exhibit"A"—Oro Valley Translational Zoning Designations. 3. Location Map and County Zoning Designations. 4. Letter from Owner's Representative. F:\OV\OV9\1999\9-99-51\TZTC3.rpt.doc AtA bl.%31 A)11'11-- Plane d Zoning A dministrator ' t /01 Co is unity Develop ent Director own Manager ORDINANCE NO. (0)99- 45 AN ORDINANCE TRANSLATING THE ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY CB-1,TR,AND CR-2 TO ORO VALLEY C-2, R-6, AND R1-10, WITH CONDITIONS, ON THE PROPERTIES KNOWN AS THE HALLAQ PROPERTIES, LOCATED WITHIN MAP 4; AND REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH. WHEREAS, the owners of certain real property known as the Hallaq Properties, located within Map 4,has been annexed into the Town; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, has considered said translational zoning with added conditions on these properties at a duly noticed Public Hearing, in accordance with State Statue, and having made its recommendations to the Town Council; and WHEREAS, the Oro Valley Town Council has duly considered the translational zoning with added conditions at a Public Hearing, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY: SECTION 1. That the Hallaq Properties contained within Map 4 be translationally zoned from Pima County CB-1, TR, and CR-2 to Oro Valley C-2, R-6, and R1-10, as shown in the attached Exhibit A, and that all applicable development standards of the C-2, R-6, and R1-10 zoning districts shall apply thereto to said property. SECTION 2. That the 20 acres of R-6 zoning designation shall not exceed a maximum density of 12.5 dwelling units per acre (DU/ac). SECTION 3. That a 16,000 square foot minimum lot size shall apply for the 50 acres translated to the R1-10 zoning designation. A 12,000 square foot minimum lot size may be permitted in the R1-10 zone under a lot reduction option, which will require additional preservation of open space and buffering of adjacent properties. The gross density in the R1-10 zoning designation shall not exceed two dwelling units per acre (DU/ac). SECTION 4. That the property owner, and their successors, shall record a final plat or begin construction upon an approved development plan for the C-2 portion on the property by July 6th, 2004 in order to retain the C — 2 conditional zoning entitlement. This date shall be amended to July 6th, 2009 if the General Plan Land Use designation for the C-2 site is amended to "Community Commercial"by July 6th, 2004. SECTION 5. That all ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be and the same are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict; SECTION 6. That this ordinance and the various parts thereof are hereby declared to be severable. If anysection, sub-section, sentence, clause, word or phrase of this ordinance is, for any reason, held to be unconstitutional, such holdings shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this 1St day of September, 1999, Paul H. Loomis,Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Daniel L. Dudley,Town Attorney \\OV PZD\PZl\OV\OV9\1999\9-99-51\ORD1NANCEHALLAQ.doc A N--- / >,-T /, ------ ---- ,, / -------------_______.---;— — / __.-- /--, ;,_,.i/ /—::::7 i )" ( i I 1 -I (N...,.. -0 ------- ,,,,\:--- \ \ ,,,,\''.>,.-//:v-vi t_L ,. \\I N 1 I i ) 1 C v 1 1 I I 1 i IL \ I 1 i , 1 ! i I • LE. 1 I 1 i I L '/ 41... . -------4----- / I 7^-r: , N< / i , \ 157 , / Ns, ) (...5 , 4 , 1 . \ iloi Li-- AIPIRIOM I ' ''.7 I 0 Sa , I ri- 7 \ ›N \ ' la 1--I ,. 1 1 / Am MO . z+ / 1 • , MN 1 0 ', L----i)/ 1 1_ _ tom. iii r--, H / \\ 1 / "1 \ / a. ,--... 0C/) i ' / i i 44 INU.-- ..,'-- I, _ .._ 4 .) CZ 0 (---\ 1 ca CD co z iiiim -..t. a CL 1 1 • = wwwiihar .0 \ •414 p ** 1 0 m— :1-.• a -- •-- 44,0 6\ lji U) Ci) ec 4 BIL CL cri • A I. 6 %, 1 I 8 a , \ a) \0) *slum c , •..... , s. ... - .0 I 8 al w --- \co -- I Li= i / cz (1) = w CZ E> §4 ,s— r- i d i 1 I 1 I E2 A, \ i \ , I \ 1 \ I 1 \ \ \ / \ \ 0 / ,./// ___-_,./ _,_\,\,, 1 1 1 , 1 1 ______Li I 1 1 ) 0 U i- \ \ i ' J i , 1 , c\I / ,A\ _ ,,,/./...--- / (-7-3,, ,\\\L______------ 7-0,>/ //i -.Qii / 1 ,---. / ; \ \ , i \ 1I/ � I ! i 1 7 gK\ ---. - ' ". Qi'fr- I ' _____zi, , .,\\„\ \ \‘‘,, , . .>-'i j 1 f—/I F, ,,, -,,, // r 1 I -- --, , 1 1 '', 0 / , / J--(/' y ,,\ i 4) al E.) ___ _L 1 R__ (\_ , / 3 iv ce 4.11411/ i , _ Ak 4404 ,,7_ 4 \7 W) -0 iritaag' 5 E. I iiir41101111 \( 0 atitliftsmallt el \. or\-ciz+ O mom/ , ' iniftria si PP ' 7-\\ c \ „/ c Raft / Q , i •En ---, 13 a) co tA, ri- ! a tap aillia . a c',4ct 3 , ...,4 11 a. wwir 0 ° Za' 0 WV Wit/ C'4 C T NI*Wit 8 � En * 44to*d&w,ika 4 1 # Aga4r Alp . 4E' z, P -us NIL c 4 aft • tv,IJ cc cn Ld8 # S*w 11 OP * $00 , 0 ..1 -g �0 i •', ii1%. 0 E .. L- .1 , v A a. 0 • / Isom .1 1: .,,, i .7.0 iv� p- /♦ \�a #1� * peeIlo4O el To 2 a) §_c CDCI ? 1 Nir . 22 1 4 / cm -.=, , ' 7 N N0 -5W L5Pow N'" , K, w th It 0 0 L U � II 1 MAY 2 1'/9 MEMORANDUM TO: TOWN OF ORO VALLEY FROM: G. LAWRENCE SCHUBART, STUBBS & SCHUBART, P. C. LL SUBJECT: HALLAQ PROPERTY: TRANSITIONAL ZONING DATE: 5/28/99 On July 21, 1970, the Pima County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved the rezoning request for 80 acres of land at the northeast corner of LaCholla Blvd. and Lambert Lane. The request included 10 acres of CB-1, 20 acres of TR (Transitional), and 50 acres of CR-2 uses. The conditions imposed by Pima County required the owner to: (1) Recording an acceptable plat that will provide for any drainage problems as well as the necessary rights-of-way; (2) A suitable arrangement with the Pima County Department of Sanitation regarding sanitary facilities; and (3) Recording a covenant holding Pima County harmless in the event of flooding. Pima County did not impose a time limitation on when the conditions for rezoning were required to be completed. The reason for this seems self- evident: In 1970 there was no established sewer system in the area, but the approved rezoning was for development that would required the owner to tie into the sewer system. We are approaching the time when this, in fact, can be done. In regard to translating the Pima County Zoning to Oro Valley Zoning, an issue has arisen regarding whether a certain portion of the land approved for TR zoning can be moved to another portion of the property. Specifically, by moving the north 5-acre portion to an area contiguous with the south 10-acre portion of '14R development, to abut Lambert Lane, would be in the best interests of the developed property to the north, and would accommodate a more efficient use of the Hallaq property. I believe that this can be done at the time of annexation. SUBJECT: HALLAQ PROPERTY: TRANSITIONAL ZONING DATE: 5/28/99 Before the statutory change adopted in 1986, Chapter 45, Section 2, effective April 10, 1986, there was no statutory prohibition in changing the zoning classification concurrent with annexation. In point of fact, often the inducement to agree to annexation involved conferring a more favorable zoning designation. In 1986 the following section was added to A.R.S. 9-471: "L. A city or town annexing an area shall adopt zoning classifications which permit densities and uses no greater than those permitted by the county immediately before annexation. Subsequent changes in zoning of the annexed territory may be made according to existing procedures established by the city and town for the rezoning of land." Inasmuch as each parcel of land needs to be treated separately to have translation zoning adopted by the Town of Oro Valley, the word "area" in the context of this statute best describes the individual parcel under single ownership. There is nothing in this statute that prevents Oro Valley from adjusting the location of a zoning designation, as long as the prohibition that the overall densities or uses are no greater than those permitted by the county immediately before annexation. This type of analysis is consistent with many of the prerogatives that exist within zoning codes themselves. A planned area development (PAD) typically designates broad zoning classifications in large areas, while at the same time permitting a methodology to tailor the development to the nature features of land and aesthetic objectives. Similarly, transfer development rights have been utilized as a means to move density of development from one area to another area more compatible for development. Finally, even the use of cluster development under zoning code criteria is a method to transfer within a property densities for a given development. These are all common methods to accomplish the same goal that we now seek to achieve.' To accommodate the translation from existing Pima County zoning to Oro Valley zoning, and with input from neighboring owners, and meetings with the Oro Valley staff, the Hallaqs submit the following proposal: 1 This analysis is consistent with ordinary notice requirements,see,e.g.,Summit ProperCy,Inc. v. Wilson,26 Ariz. 550, 550 P.2d 104 (1976) [variations from notice are allowed when the ultimate classification or zoning is no more restrictive than the noticed proposal];Sandblom v. Corbin,125 Ariz. 178,608 P .2d 317 (App 1980) [authorizing administrative adjustments to approved plan]. 2 SUBJECT: HALLAQ PROPERTY: TRANSITIONAL ZONING DATE: 5/28/99 1. The CB-1 zoning be translated to Oro Valley C-2 for the 10 acres at the southwest corner; 2. That the 5 acres north of the CB-1, abutting LaCholla Blvd., be translated to R-6; 3. The 15 acres of TR zoningeast of the CB-1, abutting Lambert Lane, . � be translated to R-6, but with the right to develop18 residences per acre; and, g 4. The remaining acreage is to be translated from CR-2 to R1-10 under the Oro ValleyZoningCode. The Halla s agree that the overall number of q � residential units cannot exceed that which could have been constructed under the existing CR-2 designation. See Attachment A. We have included, as Attachment B, the depiction which outlines the Hoe and reflects the configuration for the translation zoning. This HallaqP property � exhibit also depicts the lots in the adjoining Canada Hills development to the north. Attachment C reflects the lot size for each of those adjoining parcels. This translation zoning reflects a substantial reduction in the g development rights that would have been permitted under the Pima County Zoning Code. Hopefully those that view this proposal will recognize the substantial compromise beingoffered, and that additional limitations, including a time limitation for this development, will not be imposed. It would be unfair to require the roe to b e developed d within any set period of time when, in q property�Y P is fact the abilityto developtheproperty dependent upon other property owners participating in infrastructure improvements. 1 This increase from 12.44 units to 18 units per acre is an essential ingredient in this proposal. Under Pima County TR zoning,owners are entitled to develop up to 43.5 units per acre,which we concede is excessive. There are, though,many luxury apartment developments that have density in the range of 18 RAC and I have attached one additional brochure depicting this type of development. 3 7 B. :Minimum lot size r2 i iiementS for lots in a CR-- B. Ditini-naura area per dwe1 j?r g ,ny: Sixteen -thou- subdivision r ousubdivision may be approved by the board of sand square feet. supervisors for reduction from thirty-six thousand C. Minimum lot width: Eighty feet. square feet to twenty-fp-1:r thousmid square feet in D. Minimum yard requirements: accordance with Section 18.09.050;provided,that in 1. Front: Thirty feet; total there are no more individual one-family lots 2. Side: Ten feet each; than one lot per gross acre of the area of the subdivi- 3. Rear: Forty feet. sion zoned CR-I. (Ord. 1985-82(part), 1985) E. Building height limitations: 1. Maximum height:Thirty-four feet; 2. Maximum stories:Two. Chapter 18.23 F. Minimum distance between main buildings: Twenty feet except as required in Section CR-2 SINGLE RESIDENCE ZONE 18.09.0203 (General Residential and Rural Sections: 18.23.910 Permitted uses. 18.23.029 Conditional uses. 18.23.939 Development standards— General. tan ds---General. 18.23.040 Development standards— Detached accessory badings. 18.23.059 Cluster development option. 18.23.069 Lot reduction option. 18.23.070 Lot development option. • 18.23.910 Permitted uses. A. Uses permitted: 1. Any use as permitted in Section 18.21.010(CR- 1 Single Residence Zone), but horses, cattle, sheep or goats shall not be kept on less than one commer- cial acre and not more than one such animal for each ten thousand square feet of lot area. (Ord. 1985-82 (part), 1985) 18.23.020 Conditional uses. A. Uses conditionally permitted: 1. Any use as conditionally permitted in Section 18.21.020(CR-1 Single Residence Zone),except the raising of ratites is not permitted. (Ord. 1994-146 § 7, 1994: Ord. 1985-82(part), 1985) 18.23.930 Development standards—General. A. Minimum lot area: Sixteen thousand square feet. (Pima County 5-96) 18-52 EXHThH A 2 23 04 D - Zoning Provisions) for a rear dyes? i-ng. (Ord. 1923- 13.23.C5D LoI rafi,ae.don Dp 1051. 32(part)91.955) A. Referto Section 1 2.09.050 (Qenera1.Residential and Rural Zoning Provisions) for the general provi- 10 3.D4D •Deve o pp an meat stchr ---Dc chec1 sions of the lot reduction option. ac esso u gs. '' B. Minimum lot size requirements for lots in a CR- A. Pecoverage:covera e:one-1 rd of the total area of 2 subdivision for reduction may be approved bye rear and sideyards. board of supervisors for reduction from sixteen thou- B.the s xi height:Twenty-four-four feet. sand square feet to twelve thousand square feet in Maximum g � C. Minimumdistance iequirements: accordance with Section 18.09.050,provided that in main buildings: S even feet; total there are no more individual one-family lots 1. To 2. To front of lot line: Sixtyfeet; than two lots per gross acre of the area the subdi- 3. dos side and rear lot lines: vision zoned CR-2. (Ord. 1985-82 (part), 1985) a. Four feet if building is not used for.poultry or animals, 18.23.070 Lot development option. b. Fifty feet feet if building is used for poultry or ani- A. Refer to Section 18.09.060 (General Residential and Rural Zoning Provisions) for the provisions of mals, c. All goats,horses,cattle,sheep, or other similar the lot development option. (Ord. 1985-32 (part), animals must be confined within a stock-tight fence 1985) (no material shall be permitted not ordinarily used for a stock-tight fence)in an area of no less than four hundred square feet per animal. Such fenced-in area Chapter 13.25 shall be set back ten feet from the rear where it abuts SH,CR-1 CR-2,or i U zone CR-3 SiNGLE SILENCE ZONE an IR,�, G� 1,SR, and forty feet from the rear where it abuts a zone other than GR-1 RH, IR, SR, SH, CR-1, CR-2, or Sections: e line. A set- 18.25.010 Permitted use s. MU, and forty feet from a side property backthe side and 1 8.25.020 Conditional uses. of ten feet shall be permitted ony • where the adjacent property owners have a written 18.25.030 Development standards— recorded agreement to this effect, but, in no event, General. • 18.25.040 Development standards— orshall a corral be closer than fifty feet to any residence (Ord. Accessory buildings. living quarters in an abutting property. �., ent option. • _ 18.25.0da Cluster develop8n P1955-157 § 1 (part), 1955, ofd. 1955 S2 (pm), • ' 18.25.060 Lot reduction option. 1985) 18.25.070 Lot development option. 18.23.050 Cluster development option. Thispermitted onlyfor subdi- 13°25.- 10 P� 'fid uses° A. option shall be • allowed in this chapter, and A. Uses permitted: vided residential lots as alto e P � in Section 15.�9.o2oA in accordance with Sec- 1. All uses as permitted their associated open space, and RuralZoningProvisions); tion Residential and Rural Zon- (General Residential 15.09.00 . . Z. Temporary trailer ©r mobile or manufactured ing Provisions). (Ord. 195-111 § 1 (part), 1985; Ord. 1985-82(part), 1985) home: In accordance with Section 15.17.020A2(SR Suburban Ranch Zone); 18-52.1 ern ccuz:yy 7-90) and shall become a charge on said properties, and b. CR-2: Refer also to Section 18.23.060; such charge shall be paid by the homeowners of said c. CR-3: Refer also to Section 18.25.060. properties within thirty days after receipt of a state- B. Conditions: -ment. 1. That in total there are no more individual one- K.'Phased development. family lots than provided for in the lot reduction 1. Approval may be given for the development of option provisions of the individual zones; delineated phases of the site,after submittal of a uni- 2. That the subdivision and all park, recreation . fled cluster site plan for the total project.The phased areas, and drainage areas (CR-1.only) conform to portions shall be shown on the subdivision plat. this code, including area and neighborhood plans,as 2. Open space requirements for each phase shall be supplemented and amended; the same as stated in Section 18.09.040F. Separate 3. That full and adequate provision is made for sur- homeowners' associations with provisions . for face drainage, including dedication of rights-of-way expansion or consolidation may be created. Prior to for existing and natural watercourses; and the sale of any lot, site, unit or dwelling in a phased 4. That to promote parks and recreation: portion, the open space and recreation areas in that a. An area is dedicated for drainage purposes portion shall be designated,recorded and developed (CR-1 only) or otherwise permanently reserved_for or maintained in conformance with the approved . park or recreation purposes, either by dedication to development plan. the public or by conveyance of an undivided interest L. Amendments to final plan. to each lot owner within the subdivision or by appro- 1. Unsubstantial changes in the location, siting or priate deed restrictions or by other governmental character of buildings may be authorized by the plan- acquisition processes, ning and development services director, if required b. The total extent of said park,recreation area,or by engineering or other circumstances not foreseen drainage area (CR-1 only) is no less than the sum at the time of the final subdivision plat approval. total of the number of square feet by which the area 2. Substantial changes to the approved cluster site of each lot in the subdivision is less than that plan shall require a complete, new review of the required by the zone, entire project, to include additional fees, plan sub- c. In no event is the size of any single park or rec- mittals and meetings in accordance with this section. reation area any less than four acres, and (Ord. 1998-51 § 2, 1998; Ord. 1996-58 § 4 (part), d. Said park and recreation areas, whether dedi 1996;Ord. 1994-147§3(part), 1994;Ord. 1988-116 cated to the public or not,are reasonably available to § 4, 1988; Ord. 1986-187 § 1 (part), 1986; Ord. all lot owners within the subdivision. 1985-187 § 1 (part), 1985; Ord. 1985-111 § 1 (part), C. Approved plat recordation required:No approval 1985; Ord. 1985-82(part), 1985) on a minimum lot size reduction shall be effective until a subdivision plat complying with the commis- 18.09.050 Lot reduction option. sion's findings and certification and approved by the A. Scope: commission and supervisors is recorded in the office 1. Minimum lot size requirements for lots in a sub- - of the county recorder. (Ord. 1985-82(part), 1985) division may be approved by the board of supervi- sors for reduction where the conditions of Section 18.09.060 Lot development option. 18.09.050B exist and the planning and zoning corn- A. Purpose.The purpose of this option is to: mission finds and certifies them to the supervisors. 1. Permit the efficient use of land; 2. The lot reduction option is permitted in the fol- lowing zones: a. CR-1: Refer also to Section 18.21.060; 18-31 (Pima County 10-98) P- `-' N r 1 �N> �� �� a, N II DoohXc) X 9 `"5,0 ►-� r -1 ti, U' o r f-4 tz �i-1 I ,O rri ti, N-rnr cnQ .ZZcnm o.1{1 cA QL I QfWARI lO$V11OHD V1 - I \\'' 41 U sr \-O ' \•� Cc) 0 i 3 11 I : s MI\ -- I CA 0 1 i -- IP\----------- - i 1 r 1 r -il til MrflICISIP,4111KKAIIMUI,A111.1441602111/5,1111,5051..t1 M o .-� `\ -10 ON 1 N r __i1/ r r r � r 2 r 3isi CD o_ ! r 0 1 0 Ir.r ›. i .') 0 0 � r tri0 A Cir L1 0- 0 r k< r 0 0 r r__� r r\ 1111111 r 0 'C:_j all ., r ---1 ' 11111 r °q1111.11 MB r .,..„ r r MI 0I1 ill- K r.) z \ 111:,r - 0 ' 0 co K CZ x x LOT Na AREA SQUARE FEET 30 8,054 29 7,370 28 7,370 27 6,820 26 6,820 25 7,480 24 8,603 23 9,234 22 9,710 20 8,693 19 8,950 18 9,317 Open Space 21 11,394 22 11,293 23 10,736 24 14,646 20 10,147 Open Space 24 10,928 25 12,780 27 11,565 28 12,713 29 12,546 32 12,376 33 11,746 34 12,801 EXHIBIT C TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 10 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: September 1, 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: H. Brent Sinclair, AICP, Community Development Director SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. (R)99-86 APPROVAL OF MODIFICATIONS TO THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH PIMA COUNTY FOR LIBRARY BOND PROCEEDS TO DEVELOP THE ORO VALLEY PUBLIC LIBRARY BACKGROUND: In the 1997 bond election, Pima County voters approved funding to establish a new northwest branch library. On August 5, 1998 a Library Technical Advisory Committee (LTAC) was appointed by the Oro Valley Town Council to facilitate discussions regarding the construction of a new Library on Town-owned property located adjacent to the Town Hall Complex. After several meetings the LTAC put together a draft IGA for the design and construction of the Oro Valley Public Library, which the Council reviewed and approved at the July 21, 1999 meeting. This IGA covers only the first phase of the project, and will secure the $2 million dollars in County bond funds for this project. SUMMARY: The IGA, after receiving approval from the Town Council, was reviewed by the Pima County Board of Supervisors at their August 3, 1999 meeting. The Board had several concerns and asked that revisions be made to the IGA priorapproval.to their a rovalTheycontinued their review of the IGA to the Board's August 16th, 1999 meeting, subject to receiving a revised version from Oro Valley. The revisions made at the August 3 meeting mainly relate to the ownership of the building and of the land. The changes are shown with strike-outs for language Pima County wanted to delete and capital/bold letters for new language to be incorporated. The Board of Supervisors met again on August 16th, 1999, at which time they reviewed the IGA again. At that meeting a decision was made to revise language relating to the financing of the project. The revised language better defines how and when funds will be transferred from the County to the Town. The revised language has been included in the attached IGA and is shown in capital, bold letters. RECOMMENDATION: In order to implement Phase I of the Library Project, the Town must execute an Intergovernmental Agreement with Pima County. If the revisions incorporated by Pima County meet with the Councils approval, it is staff's recommendation that the IGA be approved at this time. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 2 SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to APPROVE the Intergovernmental Agreement with Pima County, as revised per the Pima County Board of Supervisor's, for the receipt of Library Bond proceeds, in the amount of$2,000,000, and to set forth the responsibility of both parties for the design and construction of the Oro Valley Public Library. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. (R)99- 86 2. Proposed Intergovernmental Agreement with Pima County Community Develop nt Director Town Manager F:IN D I V l D\L M'I\L I B RAR YU G A2.tc c RESOLUTION NO. (R)99- 86 A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, MODIFYING THE PROPOSED INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGEEMENT ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. (R)99-81 BETWEEN THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY AND PIMA COUNTY FOR LIBRARY BOND PROCEEDS TO CONSTRUCTION THE NEW ORO VALLEY PUBLIC LIBRARY WHEREAS, the Town of Oro Valley has the authority to enter into contractual arrangements with other governmental agencies in order to provide services to its residents; and WHEREAS, it has determined that it is in the best interests of the Town and its citizens to enter into an intergovernmental agreement with Pima County regarding library bond proceeds for the construction of the Oro Valley Public Library; and WHEREAS, the approval of the modified intergovernmental agreement will further this goal by allowing Pima County to provide the funding for the construction of a library, which is hereby determined to be in furtherance of the public health, safety and welfare of the citizens of the Town; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA AS FOLLOWS: 1. That the attached modified Intergovernmental Agreement is hereby approved. 2. That the Mayor and the Town of Oro Valley and all necessary administrative officials are hereby directed and authorized to take all necessary steps related to the execution of said agreement. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this 1st day of September , 1999 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA Paul H. Loomis, Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn E. Cuvelier, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Dan L. Dudley, Town Attorney INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN PIMA COUNTY AND THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY FOR THE ORO VALLEY PUBLIC LIBRARY DATED , 1999 Town of Oro Valley Community Development Department 11000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley,Arizona 85737 Telephone: 520.797.9797 Facsimile: 520.742.1022 1 Intergovernmental Agreement between Pima County and the Town of Oro Valley for the Oro Valley Public Library This Intergovernmental Agreement is made and entered into this day of 1999, by and between Pima County, a body politic and corporate of the State of Arizona ("County") and the Town of Oro Valley,Arizona, a municipal corporation ("Town"). Recitals A. Pima County and the Town of Oro Valley desire to develop community library facilities. B. County and Town desire to provide for the construction, development, maintenance, operation, and use of public library facilities (the "Project") at the Southeast corner of Naranja Drive and La Canada Drive in Oro Valley,Arizona. C. County and Town desire to define the terms and conditions under which the Project is to be designed, engineered, constructed, financed, operated, and maintained. D. The Pima County Board of Supervisors included the Project in the Bond Improvement Plan for the May 20, 1997 Special Bond Election. E. The County bonds authorized in the May 20, 1997 Special Bond Election allocated $2,000,000 for the Project. F. Construction of the Project is anticipated to commence on or before July 1, 2000 and is estimated to be completed approximately 10 months after the start of construction. G. County and Town agree that the Town shall design and construct the Project. H. County and Town may contract for services and enter into agreements with one another for joint or cooperative action pursuant to A.R.S. Sec. 11-952. I. County and Town are authorized by A.R.S. Sec. 11-952 to enter into a cooperative agreement for the establishment, development, maintenance, or administration of a public library. J. The Pima County Board of Supervisors adopted guidelines for bonding disclosure, accountability, and implementation of County bond program projects within other jurisdictions in Pima County Ordinance No. 1997-35, Section VIII, and Pima County Code Sec. 3.06.080. NOW,THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants, stipulations, and conditions hereinafter contained the parties hereby agree as follows: 2 1. Purpose. The purpose of this agreement is to set forth the responsibilities of the parties for the design and construction of the Oro Valley Public Library as described in Exhibit A of this Agreement (the "Project"). 2. Financing of Project a. Total Cost of the Project. The total cost of the Project is estimated by the parties to be $3,995,000. The final cost of the Project shall be the actual sum necessary to complete the Project. b. County share. County shall pay $2,000,000 from County bond funds for the Project, including approximately $20,000 for public art. No County funds in excess of $2,000,000 may be expended for the project. c. Town share. Town shall pay any and all costs of the Project in excess of allocated County bond funds, including the costs of any change orders approved by Town for unanticipated work. Town's share of the total cost of the Project is estimated by the parties to be $1,995,000, of which approximately $19,995 is for public art. d. County deposit in escrow. Town shall give County at loast 45 days prior notice that Town will release a Request for Proposals to architectural and engineering firms to prepare preliminary architectural and programmatic documents. Within 30 days of receiving notice, County shall deposit$330,000.00 in an interest bearing escrow account from which Town can draw for payment. Any interest earned by the escrow account shall remain with the County. Town shall give County at least 45 days prior notice that Town will advertise for bids - : :-- .:- :- . : - - ' :•- . • ithin 30 days of receiving notice, County shall deposit $1,670,000.00 in an interest bearing escrow account from which Town can draw for payment. Any interest earned by the escrow account shall remain with the County. Following completion of construction, Town shall d. COUNTY WILL RESERVE $2,000,000 FROM FUTURE BOND SALES FOR PURPOSES OF FUNDING THE PROJECT; $330,000 FOR DESIGN, AND $1,670,000 FOR CONSTRUCTION,WHICH INCLUDES APPROXIMATELY $20,000 FOR PUBLIC ART. AS PROJECT MANAGER,TOWN WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THE ACCURACY OF INVOICES AND CERTIFYING THAT SAID WORK HAS BEEN COMPLETED PRIOR TO REQUESTING REIMBURSEMENT FROM COUNTY. COUNTY AGREES TO REIMBURSE THE TOWN WITHIN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS OF RECEIPT OF A REIMBURSEMENT REQUEST UP TO THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000,000. ALL REIMBURSEMENT REQUESTS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED TO PIMA COUNTY FINANCE DIRECTOR, 130 WEST CONGRESS, 10TH FLOOR, TUCSON,AZ., 85701 IN A FORMAT TO BE MUTUALLY AGREED UPON BY COUNTY AND TOWN FINANCE DEPARTMENTS. 3 e. Permits. At no cost or expense to the County,Town shall provide or pay for all permits and sewer connection fees required in connection with the Project. f. Transaction privilege tax. Town agrees that the construction pursuant to this Agreement shall be exempt from any transaction privilege taxes levied by Town. 3. Town Obligations. a. Design and construction. Town shall administer the design and construction of the Project. To that end,Town shall prepare the consultant contract for design, select the consultant,who will create construction contract documents, bid the construction contract, choose the contractor, and supervise and inspect the construction of the Project. Town shall provide County with copies of all technical documents and drawings required for design of the Project. b. County participation. Town shall provide County the opportunity to participate in and provide advice on all major items (programming, schematic design, etc) that affect the design and operation of the Project. Town shall include in its contract for design a requirement that the consultant closely coordinate with County relating to the design of library facilities. Such design requirements shall be approved by Town prior to incorporation in the design. c. Working drawings and specifications. Following completion of the Project design, the working drawings and specifications shall be provided to County for approval, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. d. Public participation. Town shall manage all public participation processes deemed necessary by Town and County for design and construction of the Project. County shall be invited to participate in the public participation process. Town shall coordinate all public meetings on this Project in compliance with Board of Supervisor's Policy, 3.5 —Notification to Board of Supervisors of Public Meetings to be Held in Their District (See Exhibit A), and Administrative Procedure 3.8 implementing Policy 3.5 (See Exhibit B). e. Official dedication or opening ceremonies. Town shall coordinate all official dedication or opening ceremonies for this Project with the County Supervisor in whose district this Project is located. f. Town point of contact. Town shall provide a unified point of contact to County for this Project. All communications to County shall be forwarded through Kate O'Rielly, Community Resources Director. g. Town ownership. After completion of construction,Town shall owner 50% of the 15,000 square foot Project facilities, and the county shall own 42%ALL OF THE UNDERLYING LAND; COUNTY SHALL OWN 50% OF THE PROJECT FACILITIES. This is based on funds supplied by both entities and the value of the land at the time of construction. 4 h. Compliance with County laws. Town agrees to comply with the provisions of Pima County Ordinance No. 1997-35, Section VIII, and Pima County Code Sec. 3.06.080, "Implementation of County Bond Projects in Other Jurisdictions". (See Exhibit C). i. Compliance with the County's MWBE Program. Town agrees to comply with the provisions of Pima County Ordinance No. 1997-44, Chapter 20.20, Professional Services Contracts and Chapter 20.24, Construction Contracts. (See Exhibit D). 4. County Obligations. a. Design assistance. County shall review and comment on all engineering studies, technical data and specifications provided by Town pursuant to this Agreement for the design and construction of the Project under a schedule mutually acceptable to County and Town to ensure timely progress and completion of improvements. b. County point of contact. Mike Tuinstra, Pima County Facilities Management Director shall provide a unified point of contact to Town for this Project. All communications to Town shall be forwarded through the Town Manager or designee. c. County inspection and approval. County may jointly inspect the construction with the Town. Town shall allow County personnel reasonable access to the Project site before, during, and after construction, provided that County staff coordinate visits in advance with Town staff associated with the Project whenever possible. 5. Pygmy-Owl Survey The parties mutually agree that the site for the library is in close proximity to an area designated by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) as critical habitat for the Cactus Ferruginous Pygmy-Owl. Because of this proximity, the parties agree that consultation with the Service on this project and its potential to adversely impacting critical habitat is imperative. The parties agree that County shall initiate this consultation,with the full participation of Town. The parties also agree to abide by decisions of the Service regarding factors such as the need, timing and number of pygmy-owl surveys or whether design and construction of the project should proceed under the auspices of the County's Sonoran Desert Conservation Plan. 6. Town Operation and Maintenance. a. Operation and maintenance. Upon completion of the project, the operation and maintenance costs for the project shall be negotiated through a separate IGA between the Town of Oro Valley and the Tucson Pima COUNTY Public FREE Library District. b. Facility use by County residents. Town agrees to make the Project facilities and collection available to all residents of Pima County without restriction or preference to jurisdiction of residence. 5 7. Indemnification a. Mutual indemnity. To the fullest extent permitted by law, each party to this Agreement shall indemnify, defend and hold the other party, its governing board or body, officers, departments, employees and agents, harmless from and against any and all suits, actions, legal or administrative proceedings, claims, demands, liens, losses, fines or penalties, damages, liability, interest, attorney's, consultant's and accountant's fees or costs and expenses of whatsoever kind and nature, resulting from or arising out of any act or omission of the indemnifying party, its agents, employees or anyone acting under its direction or control, whether intentional, negligent, grossly negligent, or amounting to a breach of contract, in connection with or incident to the performance of this Agreement. AS THE TOWN RETAINS COMPLETE OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL OF THE UNDERLYING LAND,TOWN REMAINS COMPLETELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL LIABILITIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE LAND, INCLUDING ANY ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS OR CONDITIONS. TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW,TOWN SHALL INDEMNIFY, DEFEND,AND HOLD COUNTY HARMLESS AS TO ANY AND ALL CLAIMS OR DAMAGES ASSOCIATED WITH THE LAND AS FULLY SET OUT ABOVE. b. Preexisting conditions. To the fullest extent permitted by law, each party to this Agreement shall indemnify, defend and hold the other party, its governing board or body, officers, departments, employees and agents, harmless from and against any claims and damages, as fully set out above in paragraph a., resulting from or arising out of the existence of any substance, material or waste, regulated pursuant to federal, state, or local environmental laws, regulations, or ordinances, that is present on,in or below or originated from property owned or controlled by the ifideffiftifying-party prior to the execution of this Intergovernmental Agreement. c. Notice. Each party shall notify the other in writing within thirty (30) days of the receipt of any claim, demands, suits, or judgments against the receiving party for which the party intends to invoke the provisions of this Article. Each party shall keep the other party informed on a current basis of its defense of any claims, demands, suits, or judgments under this Article. d. Negligence of indemnifying party. The obligations under this Article shall not extend to the negligence of the indemnifying party, its agents, employees , or e. Survival of termination. This Article shall survive the termination, cancellation, or revocation,whether in whole or in part, of this Intergovernmental Agreement. 8. Insurance. When requested by the other party, each party shall provide proof to the other of their worker's compensation, automobile, accident, property damage, and liability coverage or program of self-insurance. 6 9. Right of Entry. Execution of this Agreement by Town grants to County the right to enter upon Town- owned lands to inspect the Project. County staff will coordinate site visits in advance with town staff. 10. Public Art. Public art budgeted at$19,995 for the Town's portion and$20,000 for the County's portion, shall be included in the Project. Public art shall be approved by both parties per County program standards (see Exhibit E). 11. Books and Records. Each party shall keep and maintain proper and complete books, records, and accounts, which shall be open for inspection and audit by duly authorized representatives of any other party at all reasonable times. All design and construction drawings, records, documentation and correspondence shall be the property of Town at the completion of the Project, except copies maintained by County for its records. 12. Town Accounting of Town Project Costs. Town shall account for all Project costs to be paid by the County pursuant to this Agreement. 13. County Inspection and Audit. County employees may perform any inspection of the Project or reasonable audit of any books or records of Town in order for the County to satisfy itself that the monies on the Project have been spent and the Project completed in accordance with this Agreement. County staff will request a joint staff inspection of the Project site along with any related records on an as-needed basis. 14. No Third Party Beneficiaries. Nothing in the provisions of this Agreement is intended to create duties or obligations to or rights in third parties not parties to this Agreement or affect the legal liability of either party to the Agreement by imposing any standard of care with respect to the maintenance of the Project different from the standard of care imposed by law. 15. Legal Jurisdiction. a. Nothing in this Intergovernmental Agreement shall be construed as either limiting or extending the legal jurisdiction of County or Town. b. It is not intended by this Intergovernmental Agreement to, and nothing contained in this Intergovernmental Agreement shall be construed to, create any partnership, joint venture or employment relationship between the parties or create any employer- 7 employee relationship between the Town and any County employees, or between the County and any Town employees. Neither party shall be liable for any debts, accounts, obligations nor other liabilities whatsoever of the other, including (without limitation) the other party's obligation to withhold Social Security and income taxes for itself or any of its employees. 16. Compliance with Laws. The parties shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, rules, regulations, standards, and executive orders,without limitation to those designated by this Agreement. The laws and regulations of the State of Arizona shall govern the rights of the parties, the performance of this Agreement and any disputes hereunder. Any action relating to this Agreement shall be brought in an Arizona court. a. Anti-discrimination. The provisions of A.R.S. Sec. 41-1463 and Executive Order Number 99-4 issued by the Governor of the State of Arizona are incorporated by this reference as a part of this Intergovernmental Agreement. b. Americans with Disabilities Act. All Facilities shall be constructed and operated in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C., Sec. 1201, et seq. 17. Remedies. Either party may pursue any remedies provided by law for the breach of this Agreement. No right or remedy is intended to be exclusive of any other right or remedy and each shall be cumulative and in addition to any other right or remedy existing at law or in equity or by virtue of this Agreement. 18. Notification. All notices or demands upon any party to this Agreement shall be in writing, unless other forms are designated elsewhere, and shall be delivered in person or sent by mail addressed as follows: To Town: Mr. H. Brent Sinclair, Community Development Director Town of Oro Valley 11000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley,Arizona 85737-7015 To County: Kate O'Rielly, Community Resource Director Pima County Community Resources 130 W. Congress, 10th Floor Tucson,Arizona 85701 19. Construction of Agreement. a. Entire Agreement. This instrument constitutes the entire agreement between the parties pertaining to the subject matter hereof, and all prior or contemporaneous 8 agreements and understandings, oral or written, are hereby superseded and merged herein. b. Amendment. This agreement shall not be modified, amended,altered, or changed except by written agreement signed by both parties. c. Construction and interpretation. All provisions of this Agreement shall be construed to be consistent with the intention of the parties as expressed in the recitals hereof. d. Severability. In the event that any provision of this Agreement or the application thereof is declared invalid or void by statute or judicial decision, such action shall have no effect on other provisions and their application which can be given effect without the invalid or void provision or application, and to this extent the provisions of the Agreement are severable. In the event that any provision of this Agreement is declared invalid or void, the parties agree to meet promptly upon request of the other party in an attempt to reach an agreement on a substitute provision. e. Captions and headings. The headings used in this Agreement are for convenience only and are not intended to affect the meaning of any provision of this Agreement. 20. Waiver. Waiver by either party of any breach of any term, covenant, or condition herein contained shall not be deemed a waiver of any other term, covenant, or condition, or any subsequent breach of the same or any other term, covenant, or condition herein contained. 21. Force Majeure. A party shall not be in default under this Agreement if it does not fulfill any of its obligations under this Agreement because it is prevented or delayed in doing so by reason of uncontrollable forces. The term "uncontrollable forces," shall mean, for the purpose of this Agreement, any cause beyond the control of the party affected,including but not limited to failure of facilities, breakage or accident to machinery or transmission facilities,weather conditions, flood, earthquake,lightning, fire, epidemic,war,riot, civil disturbance, sabotage, strike, lockout, labor dispute, boycott, material or energy shortage, casualty loss, acts of God, or action or non-action by governmental bodies in approving or failing to act upon applications for approvals or permits which are not due to the negligence or willful action of the parties, order of any government officer or court (excluding orders promulgated by the parties themselves), and declared local, state, or national emergency,which,by exercise of due diligence and foresight, such party could not reasonably have been expected to avoid. Either party rendered unable to fulfill any obligations by reason of uncontrollable forces shall exercise due diligence to remove such inability with all reasonable dispatch. 22. Term and Termination of Intergovernmental Agreement. a. Effective Date. This Agreement shall be effective upon recording with the Office of the Pima County Recorder. 9 b. Term. Those portions of this Intergovernmental Agreement pertaining to the construction of the Project shall terminate upon completion and acceptance of the construction contract for Project by Town;however, the ownership, operation, maintenance, and liability provisions shall remain in effect until terminated or modified in writing by mutual agreement. c. Termination. 1. For cause. A party may terminate this Agreement for material breach of the Agreement by the other party. Prior to any termination under this paragraph, the party allegedly in default shall be given written notice by the other party of the nature of the alleged default. The party said to be in default shall have 45 days to cure the default. If the default is not cured within that time, the other party may terminate this Agreement. Any such termination shall not relieve either party from liabilities or costs already incurred under this Agreement. 2. At will. This Intergovernmental Agreement may be terminated by County or Town by giving 60 days written notice. Such termination shall not relieve either party from those liabilities or costs already incurred under this Intergovernmental Agreement. 3. A.R.S., Sec. 38-511. This Intergovernmental Agreement is subject to the provisions of A.R.S., Sec. 38-511. 4. Non-appropriation. It is acknowledged that all obligations of the County and Town hereunder to make payments to or to incur costs for the specified Project shall be subject to annual appropriation by the respective governing bodies and to any limitation imposed by budget laws or other applicable state or local law or regulation, and are undertaken subject to and in accordance with such processes and constitutional limitations. Notwithstanding any other provision in this Intergovernmental Agreement, this Intergovernmental Agreement may be terminated if for any reason the Town Council or the Pima County Board of Supervisors does not appropriate sufficient monies for the purpose of maintaining the Intergovernmental Agreement. In the event of such cancellation,Town and County shall have no further obligation to the other party other than for payment for services rendered prior to cancellation. 5. Arbitrage. County may unilaterally terminate this Intergovernmental Agreement whenever the County determines violation of federal arbitrage regulations are likely to occur and may reallocate the Project funds to any project authorized by the bond improvement plan. 6. Legal authority. Neither party warrants to the other its legal authority to enter into this Agreement. If a court of competent jurisdiction, at the request of a third person, should declare that either party lacks authority to enter into this Agreement, or any part of it, then the Agreement, or parts of it affected by such order, shall be null and void, and no recovery may be had by either party against the other for lack of performance or otherwise. 10 7. Ownership of property upon termination. Any termination of this Agreement shall not relieve any party from liabilities or costs already incurred under this Agreement, nor affect any ownership of the Project construed pursuant to this Agreement. IF TERMINATION OCCURS AFTER COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION,TOWN WILL PAY TO COUNTY A SUM EQUAL TO 50% OF THE PRESENT VALUE OF THE PROJECT FACILITIES. UPON RECEIPT OF PAYMENT, COUNTY WILL TRANSFER ITS OWNERSHIP INTEREST IN THE PROJECT FACILITIES TO TOWN. 11 In Witness Whereof County has caused this Intergovernmental Agreement to be executed by the Chairman of its Board of Supervisors,upon resolution of the Board and attested to by the Clerk of the Board, and the Town has caused this Intergovernmental Agreement to be executed by the Mayor, upon resolution of the Mayor and Council and attested to by its Clerk. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PIMA COUNTY Mayor Chair, Board of Supervisors ATTEST: ATTEST: Clerk,Town of Oro Valley Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Intergovernmental Agreement Determination The foregoing Intergovernmental Agreement between Pima County and the Town of Oro Valley has been reviewed pursuant to A.R.S., Sec. 11-952 by the undersigned,who have determined that it is in proper form and is within the powers and authority granted under the laws of the State of Arizona to those parties to the Intergovernmental Agreement represented by the undersigned. Town of Oro Valley Pima County Town Attorney Deputy County Attorney 12 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: September 1, 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Valerie Feuer, Senior Planner SUBJECT: OV12-98-1A RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 11 STONE CANYON GOLF COURSE TEMPORARY CLUBHOUSE AND RECREATION CENTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN, LOCATED WEST OF RANCHO VISTOSO BLVD., ONE MILE NORTH OF VISTOSO HIGHLANDS DRIVE BACKGROUND: Stone Canyon Golf Course at Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 11 is an approximately 239 acre parcel of land that lies north and west of the existing Rancho Vistoso Golf Course, north of Vistoso Highlands Drive. The golf course development plan was approved by Town Council on May 6, 1998 without the clubhouse. The recreation center location was approved by PAD amendment on February 3, 1999. SUMMARY: Stone Canyon will be a private golf course within a gated community. A temporary golf course clubhouse with associated parking has been combined with the recreation area required by OVZCR for all subdivisions. The golf course membership will be available to a limited number of Stone Canyon residents, while the recreation area will be open to all Stone Canyon residents. Golf Course Overlay Zone Off-street parking must meet the requirements of Article 11-1, Parking, and be adequate in number to serve persons employed, residing or visiting on the premises so as to prevent congestion of surrounding streets and promote the safety of the public. The applicant has proposed to provide a slightly reduced number of parking spaces for the combination of uses of the club house and recreation area. Sec. 11-105 of OVZCR allows the Planning and Zoning Administrator to approve a reduced number of parking spaces, based on the use with the highest parking demand, if the uses would not be operated simultaneously. Staff supports the reduction in parking spaces, based on different times of peak use. Encroachment into Areas of 25% Slope The Rancho Vistoso PAD requires that areas of 25% slope or greater be set aside as non-buildable areas. The design of this golf course requires that some areas encroach into the non-build area. The Planning and Zoning Administrator agreed,prior to project submittal,that there could be limited encroachment into the 25% slope areas, 2rovided that an equal amount of buildable area was designated on the development plan as open space. The areas to be exchanged have been approved by the Planning and Zoning Administrator. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 3 While much of the developed area has been planned around the sloped areas,there is an identified encroachment of 10,089 square feet. Buildable area in the amount of 13,958 square feet has been identified as undisturbed open space in exchange, northeast of the parking areas and joining two 25% sloped areas. Staff has approved this p location of the area of exchange. Recreation Area One of the conditions of the PAD amendment approving the location of the recreation area was that the size and number of active and passive areas must be consistent with the recreation area requirements of OVZCR Sec. 4- 305F. The recreation area must be provided in a ratio of one acre to 85 dwelling units. The recreation area, combined with the pathway system throughout Stone Canyon, meets this requirement. The three active and five passive amenities required by code have been included within the indoor and outdoor areas. Traffic A 2 lane private road will provide access to this site that is an extension of Hohokam Village Place. The traffic impact report update of July 2, 1999, by Curtis Lueck and Associates, has determined that 648 trips will be generated per day by this development. There is no through traffic traveling across the site from other originations. Therefore, the proposed area street network will have sufficient capacity to provide for an acceptable level of service. Drainage This site is not within a FEMA designated flood plain. Additionally, the site has been determined to be non- jurisdictional in accordance to Section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, 33 USC 1334. However, the site is in a critical basin, the Highlands Wash Basin. Regional retention is provided at the Moore Road Basin. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD ACTION: The Development Review Board recommended approval, by a vote of 5-0, on August 10, 1999. GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE: Planning Staff finds that the Stone Canyon Golf Course Temporary Clubhouse and Recreation Area Development Plan is in compliance with General Plan policy 3.1F, maintain and enhance Oro Valley's residential/resort/recreation character. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 3 of 3 RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval of 0V12-98-1A Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 11 Stone Canyon Golf Course Temporary Clubhouse and Recreation Center Development Plan, subject to the conditions attached. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to approve 0V12-98-1A Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 11 Stone Canyon Golf Course Temporary Clubhouse and Recreation Center Development Plan, OR I move to approve 0V12-98-1A Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 11 Stone Canyon Golf Course Temporary Clubhouse and Recreation Center Development Plan, effective on the date of satisfaction of the conditions attached and the following additional conditions OR I move to deny 0V12-98-1A Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 11 Stone Canyon Golf Course Temporary Clubhouse and Recreation Center Development Plan, finding that ATTACHMENTS: 1. Staff Conditions of Approval 2. Development Plan loge Plannin'"d Zoning Administrator Ac/k. Co ►nity Develop - Director 4. .,4 Town Manager �� F:\ov\ov12\1998\12-98-1A\DPTC.rpt.doc CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OV12-98-1A STONE CANYON GOLF COURSE TEMPORARY CLUB HOUSE AND RECREATION CENTER (RANCHO VISTOSO,NEIGHBORHOOD 11) DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1. There shall be no encroachment into the dedicated natural open space, with the exception of the areas identified on the development plan. A trample zone, not to exceed 5 feet in depth, may be permitted. 2. Any significant changes to the approved development plan must be submitted and reviewed by planning staff. 3. All sidewalk against the curb must be 5-ft wide, detail 3/2. 4. Remove the ribbon curb from details 1/2 and 2/2, and add vertical curb. {,� y y NN M Y N P ; p Y + Y N ;p1 v a St + Y N c-5 . ? J? , ," y.r p . 11 11 n( i4,--- 0 41 40g � kl > 4444Pv _ � p ypS � N q " o11 01 ihrh1 0 gi� 1 <I I � p A g 1 g " � 3f 2g° mA P. IA "44 j'cl'4 ' ' P.P. ' i- re ' ' l'A) 4 A. -. P2 0; q ya22E AR 6i 8ml y i$ F F FPO F 4 m g> c <1 6art" A'h- ' � 4jQ�J �$�$wir �� �{.. �� ^� 5 2S c� fi ��6 * � f�] 8TmM n�o�.. �_ {Q �t��O o�{oy . s1 � x A� $C~ p n mSS=tltl8 pNfp� }a{ 1G= p�j :4f � ;J1 P 1.1 2 � 0� O� >gC =44 0 g 7Jii1AA{ _ "f'iN:666 1.� a., j :4f cl n• + > tm 6 pA., 1 1 m o: ,,, ._,....,..,...,..,.„,...,,,,,,••.,- 0 4C `Zopp m( ,f..gA $ T2 'a ii.'AT2 i-f _ ` _> [>�g ". o To fqS,� > �o ' 8 ! rS$ ��j��zi�,V9 c-f ��•1 �S ¢4 88 yop v A m [1, 5 ' I'.r�'.11 r+1 I CG F Z N>n 4^ N -,o g h! 4,, ,,,,,,, , N Q o o u o p p 0 0 0 0 o e r o g.o y i C i > L.qi 1 ZO' z, , +1 G3g6,'N x JO V', � Z J O >2 1 C < ¢ 1 O i o P a Z pp8, .YNxS9 t 8aBgG91!ifyYi8ia ! ,n H $ v_ l '1 <_ :•t �5[_ £ A '1 p o m C cs ( .r ,=193 ,, t 1 4 Pi !li 4'7 4q halll i 1 1! A .p; !! a -_, 8 h!4> A 1 0 p,ORE 0 .,2 A e 0 Q,VA Wo ��saraY�y�.;N�•rs;pe.�r � '� €m: !! II �_� F _ A~ A 6 ;2 R M pL m > grAAr1 y q L = $Ag 8,0 W_ 1 ♦ S > 'fi x p p�p . vii, j O g h �y QQm R.� m��r �fjj PI7E 6 ♦ �' n� AH Z 2 § f.14' V(1 8 cl gg $ i i> Yj $= s ri81 ' @ Vs $ $ ? r- co � � � 4 � �mQmNhif: v � j " Omi 4 < > m 8 �t J RANCHO VIS !SO NEIGH. 11\\ C7' r STONE CANYO, I (N•'TH) \\ o I (OV12-98 02)L- -——_ ,_. .. . . 3.1( Y": , 1.,: 17. N I� �^ ii a)I00 X =t' quo, - -(e' '.- ::<4 i �'%i;� CF `j< N 0 i m r. V • '116,P .':', .:'',, [i , sC? ,....:::;:2. ,. I _____,---± AN __ Cb,,t:.:_.' .- F., ------, , / 1 ...E.,..i.s. .. ‘r.k "*L--A ,- ,,p,Liii;;!;:;,Y mmP, I 'N -e4"SA,' N \ I �.• : i 0 o 46S .....---.. — - — — '7101 :' \��\•/ itijef. • i 1 '+ C�A z iii o. �E o I(r- 01 O • 3, O 0-14 0 L ? __J I:�r o m NP D 23 Pr c: m it cn I P-1 Coilpi- IINO/ 1111' Eik.' ... r- rn J. 9 ""My u ' mil AKAI O 1 __r'n_in \ = r -�vi+�orf- r.O MMM y n fnO ' Sv -O z —N00'03'39"WN � N .7.7j2638.44r / =ZN — — — 2-c-4i N'I Q rr#YiTI � C7 O • O U O z p0-.,' r 8r-N O "mob N lc Ir 7' (2) I ZIIIN, \ D 2,-,T, o�tit'llr M oma. i`, mL.• t7 0`►yy, n.)-0-.,. O. 11 I I I 0 v❑ O A a ^ O ♦ �\� \ � m ( �y 1�1(n n Z n n UI O l PIMA"2. PIMA cauYry 4�t �. ` , n� al.;)(43 t;:it;13tr3 7"'z3x 2,-,S32A• ,t+ ; pp R•] �k�'� N N4:U D m$m m v m cr Z Z m Z v m m D ��� `'`')4, �•-:�•w. pNO b� O Z Z f X1 �nr'r1l U c z r m m x m z 2 x x 9, >> , '\ �,�\ }: 2 § c�z r� O ir?,' M3 22' K ; $ o y * f N f o z v, in I zo � a _. o z. rn �o D m mmr�••z cn 1 � � •� � �+ � � o�o� � � I�����.. D ;A o 0,- v(, t,- ,f7,2 m G) O T ISR N ? D ,i) D -p C1 . 7' o - - k 'S = `�' � � � of � �j 1, (,+ D f>• 1�,(, 1 m(�n vv z r� rs1pa o cnzr Yt'fWy.�7o ,D r-�1 N 9 P N O > z m Z A Z > m O Q � Via.,--- y4 :II rj N t W CD r n .r. v 8 O� C z .r. z ' ; rr-1-'n s Z al �' 2 r < T D m A' f7 O ' I N EVir " 1 % - 1 i§, D tiPof•1� vZ Z g C r- ; C A * ; im9NO (1 ' ONb X D o o Z � � a• � z � ; �, Z �� >3 0C n u1 z ' m cA D• o • V7 ® d D to ' ; i oo= z m 8 f>•n,,F. , 7� r,N -FYI _- r Nm m C s...-_-4.p), -wino PrwA worn #0 u r:. 2 CC �� � ' z = �� � !� " m�� t;e9 Z O Fpz 'I• - I �'a, 1�/] v (,-,1 �I I , T N Ip tejc o JR5 Ti .� 7. ' `-' PIY ACCESS ESMT LINE \� l� `'� j - / 0 __ ! \ \ , \ , .--AANGHO VISTOSO NEIGH 11-' r �0-5j \ \ ; � \ '�• _.i�_SONE CANYON ORTH) � /� '/� (2..,„.(__. (Do -:.:::,i. • \ 1 as I - `\'1 , \..- - ' lig ACCESS ESMT LINE X \� ! 1)'.11 ----_.: \ _____.--- ./ �7 c; • - __ RI �I Z �nn o n z' a n 301507-72‘(::- ;*,, -,v� ' -DDVZim �y� mri m•� A ACCESS ESMT LINE i' ... a g�- o z ACCESS 7974T LINE 9 �< o + pips r g n (I p u ey S71 • � I C41iTi \ / i .. N e i �� C EXISTING �' ( ' -�/ ' ----), - �O_ `. _ -_� \ t %;N n ` 1 41-1 11\,,, O ,,MP 9'rl 9 r-D 11- ,R,„ v i' . .� % O Z ' • t,'r 'r1 CS++� ?il f�1�N m D ' "\ _ _� / '\ , /, ^r-11•x �: ,:.� In 1 I n 'pC ..-- \ \ /. ( ,// ///// 3.15A !z �i',i ^ 11ZN �/ \ ` j -/� / /. ,vV,C ' ?/. m ; 1 `J I I� gm y ::- ti _ 7 1 I ;� ne�.. :g: w j ZQ ;`+i 1.1 11,1',1 I N (n t :1,4,-, .. /1�, O. II x Z<N ; �j 4� ; I -o `i, 7 t I m f 1 ` (r" , 2.p b ,,, 2` r A N o ),, I j n•m �i " x ! , <v j i .ice O n �., EkISTING` L u woo / 1 �/ \'! ` ` ,'••�' _ m ACCESS ESMT UNE r �1 ro o /11<f 1 \ �, '1 ` --.r m 1 r� li\ o$i 0 �' 1 'T D<r,7 ` ,\ (,1 .� � o Z ` ` I0 \ rp ii PI ! IN `` J ; Nkii„,r_.-._/-- N 0\\ ��` .x / am= er/01 - ---- -----_ ilun-r , io _ ,„ 21' 1.:,:,:.:,f,,:•:,: 1> !r^ ' _ .iC` ^a `\�_�� 1 r.�3 1' W n �' /�••\' x NVQ--� 1 I ;'r ►u Of o n• 1 o [ '.. ��rl F ` a� �r \ m'� �, 'o tJti• _ 1111111111111111111111 N�/� ,i� ` `` '.# �4 ';�. f 7.t'- e: '•• \a.• . :,..,, . ------__1. ...,..,.,.,. /' . . , ,, -....... :„.„)„,„.44,1_ ,-,,-....-----_. _______ rr, ----y......... '='��F�r:....:.......'...),,..:.,...:,,,. `� � n > •IIICIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1 � 4114`41,4434.4,1�`tofilre," _ �i,bV \;0 \, .;111111.0•� z � ..; A Ave m..., :.,....,*:. /' 7.2 4a1g0 .'. '".•/.///-A `2,',/- .-',.: ',r(,,,, co . N 1N \ ;,i -,)- ',CA 4141,444ftAlickite.,.._ 14 1 1• co 2, `X `/',, .A.-,Q` ''61,- !D� (G. O> \ m IN � ,LY. / A wI <CS7 o' ,1 `-,,,,rs,..c ",-40(4fr...'-: r d ,/ ,'!.. 1 2 ' 0' 41D 8,, .. ,,v4. � '/JR g, ,,, --) T� -D , •:. -.• —. •......-.• --_,. ,,-...,,,,,// — ,..,:„ .::. ( (116 O o ( " ,--..�,R,�•,r /-.*- ;/' - ' ' \ _ . _ 64 ''' --Th ///.1 .. 2: /-. '� rCii .n< ,?) N y '..1 1\\\ 1:L.;: • , 4 ‘ , .. C4 C:::. .1) '\ ,)4 i - ____ —1-i---- -- :::. , ........A _ ,,, , . 2.„ , r.-r-!-' ,-<<. i ce% \_ \ r' , 1 J_O_L----ff-# n O Ito ":.;- . N R v - .►•1 R7X. I 7D• D Tel v l'----- c-,J)o o n!� y m et S�z • .�-, \..,� ,F,r) z FI,,, Cczhi A ':r'-'''4 s -- te--,,,,--,,,,,c, c.,,g ,,,), g f-,' Z II'D A,-o0�ti s r.. `,.,,$)', tzi, A �'I o D OHO (� NA-`.., -- (�O A , '' r- Z m ` `1)'0. r N" (" ,-.31-9 2A�mGm2oZ N N ©D top•,D�tm ��' mNA,��,, aim I� „,a.Ap,,,,,,,) -,,A =<- a O �o'1 v�N cn 2 *g n 1111 . , I ,r ,\ i t . , O 2J-ii N 4 n 111 o ' , fib m <� N ; •ill f' -' �” i ti =Dm c m ,II�I i `! OCv 0,'.--,,,,, m z f Z 11 ly ,`-.�,. to v Z x 7, . y ii, -�I` hi ov O r N m y m r.,, O � � N o� hi hi cn z2 m > � � I Nx zx • x N \ \ II p N / u x Pcoa) j / v 7_-- l r ao \ ( , 1 1 / . I / \ II ( '-\ • 30 , r.,,...,,, 1b / f- i _____ tt: o \ c- _____. -, o -2 ,,,.. --, ,., ../,V- —�� r...1:, /\\----:':/ {r.,____ ? ,,,,-_-_-,.,,-- '''''. /i�.�oo sL 1. / �. `^ _�_�._,�J / � J._. \ I .-i } 1x _ \_......' �7 1 -- .\-- ' / ;---- \ I r / n ^3010 j1.v+:. s- a•W / rw/ ( `� '\ / p '-; c— :ns. / ) ,-6)--,. ,,., ..,,z ,_...z, /,f , \. \'\ \s.ii. - q."& x (._(,---)1 i „ , c.„,,„....,::,.,. ..f,,,i, , , :, ,,,,,....... , . , ..... 3141! ., _, , A . ( / .-- A -., .. ,•--'....--\\._ \ -;-... - 10 E.,F a i f •� f� , `0 A 1 ' TD u r/ C ` 1 i;a� �� .,> .,--.•acs''- � ,, � f,. r.._. , � 23d. \ Nej p: ,.1 }-, ,..1a,p---- , .. ... .i1S' i --;(1 \ \ ,\'''• x o ov ao� �� ` U i rnN u / 0; oi,� H, ' N wJ P / �- X006 - il. �. �" /1\ .-, \i___ 1 > c� /---__ 8— 0 . -----___._,4_,. . I o7'S - x +/ Z Q II/ u, m ) 7 - 8 .. D• x -0 O ©. ? , ,a. • T. a.. ro , ;'' _ro jL u z ,x ,�'--`� /r/' I SOS 4.. 7.111.11111111111W -- -- ---- 4 l" —(_62' Ar........."-,....______—_..6._ .q41.,:- it,_:',,-1,-',:.,t,'-'. _,(<.;.,.,._:,,.,- iiirr,„-- Ailliz,.. ....;.;......; Air ' ' /t1 ,,,. N\ 'Ik #titt O 1-k7 1.7*>...4.10°Y Abil.,. .1., , CO _. ,--' N/KJ... IV -,e."..j''':';'f-ti,',..-- L'-'• -•'-') ‘IL\ / I - 416, 0 0 0 0 `.. 7.000 j -' w:�. = `��' , , ,-*/ 4 ,, . N. \--,. ( /lalii , / iirini.--4:94 rl-irp,F ); -,-,7-- N'aNk.,,,,,--.. / (c'4::,:::'- . •,•,___ '47' Iii:Wr *41:,:-.Z4::.( ''''', ..., `' m _tVA. ` .\ irm Q 1 aC 4/`� Fq - _ , I N:m�m+w � � / � wAO 26 xu xx (;) -Set......_. ca:_, , R-3, 'ii ZJ.Z m � 1>' Are x '° � bob .APV r�� �� �© /� 0 g N ,_.c o x \ `R x //: : - 44• • o � 11i a Z''_ NZAI` j G = !r, v 1/ a �r: _ !jA _ Mr !rn -Nit • © / .i. m // :4'''' r-drl.•T lip,- vi, 4„,,.:,:,:_..:,..AL- . PI m -. l■.�- .. / / rn ► �. � N c� r• 3; �u PI o j 01 f a_ ow �, ++ x a • • xp 101 ` N �� • j/ - ,!' 43 \ `11 p V -----410/. , � 14ell .. 1 VVV f � � i"\. 41, �\- w -.1•,,;1-,-IiTir,-;,\ .,.... Vi..t5;:;i:V , i.) I ‘14461, 3,;,,'S� x / xv +� '� 0 v wo 1 q Qx t,._„ ?.,,,,, ...,,.,,,., 1 , i ,...0 1 o, �� u + OI \ I'''.71 -1''' `n — I .. , I 7 . 4D,\ N, ,_\., -- -----, \,, \ x . ._ •_., _, ....___, ..... .,0,4 c„ \ 1 T . ,.- /:, ,,‘P/ifi&01 ii.ii,I.Niimmt..,,,.."illidirivliii mistv s*., 10 'Sil g51'N Q� ,•\w__.rte\ J \N `•�,t,Z ._-�--�._� J T \� -i ��. ��i�I ll r...l� u 1 "(.--) O' \------, .gyp, Eli 1111111,iiiii,lii!I,iiI,i NI •7- /'..' ,o, ,, j pill y4iii 4 r /::-:i x TIv \ L:4i ::IJi F.0L , ; ■�2 1 1.5.- z : L . / . -,' : ---= 'i) \( (",..,‘„, ./ f Li :1-L, 3,- .1 ',. "*��+r,•,,'..,.',;,"•11-... ��, 41=30 5.00 ! > Et i. L '..i.• i� A 1 M a v!I(Ilill� , � rn *Y'8..1 , �QJpb ,/ �. Q •RP /:-+ 1.6. I" I / ri , : __Iik .-3 i . ' I� D n Qtib '',• �-� c/ �l ` ,~' �+f' I�/ :ti..\ „....,::: ',. :. :1:, ,..,,.. ..,;,:,--, i �P �N I ,'/..= \Y• LI, 0. .\ ;,-.— , . \*j c,g\ c„ci L ,0.,..., / , •., .. ..-, x.;"-: 4. ,2-"-.1 -•-...:, ) .1,j1,.....,,',/ •) ii ,. 0 1 I, 7'. ( •. ' ,,. -_-I.F1)4t3, ' / . ' ' . ,t !"i< '. 8 ; ' '-, 8, O1 �- ihi .`ti �• . ` ,ooCo j � y 0 I i , .„,,w. ,/ffir„ '.„.;.. .._____ _Ir„,, / f c...„ 0.NEIGH.11 I 4,1rCAN Ts I(NORTH, _....ilikilpritr'AI-Ifir 4111. Arer.. , ... P a? • / I r.,.. /-1C3 1 \y .,,,. ...•., . . , .. .. •. ..3.... mi ,,, , _\ ._``r C.--•-,;(,,,o...__.--.7, ','4:--:,:.•.::''...:.. . c> A N-- — -8 ill V; i9 -- /N___J , ....s # •!' ' wsicT' c - ,il/ /I,/ )-`*n\--f 31.21 r > t.--5-- .. ,,--/i :1; tir ?':- -' .-2., i '-.6 4,,j , K , z g I'. :1 x 1 1 .0- 1,ji-A-F •7„.• ..,0,,fi 5 x , , <ti ..,,, , _.. za.,..73. 7-- (-,- ( __.imide Vt .sler= gi1.1- • .- A 014 - pir -t'z (S - _,.---Y 23 86. -lr Z.4 -2; i -r- - . I a z m 2 \ 5; ,- ,N. /• / .s ,,, li. _ ..,•-• kr Iiif ) 42 t!.' •?I MO%h., (6' yr.:, 0 IN: .,: 7 Liar i., . 7 e ,,,,.: ,,, if.,., .• 4 ,,,..„.4 y .• ,. . ii.:4' V• . 4-52 1 X g A.16,..• ;L g:te,.. 3;V ,,,„,,e; .:,5 T.. ,. 11 c:1 '' :;,'Pir .:07feof **•4'4"",11r-1`411 \v r'ID•:8' - . . . r . .,.,,. • , ,. •. , •./., , ,. ., • ... _..... .. . ._. ......: ' - .... . Y• • 1W-41bW * OE Z: 7 --:':.,'"---74.1<--:..-.- .::-..:-""-1 ' ,.. , • -,-;,'"VEr4 . ,,,g. , • • . - .",-,,--r .-. 5,..s .i vt t e'r.4,, C::),,,, --/. -•,,,-:.,/;----,,; -:..:--'--:'-...::..-. '.' 0 9 4 08 2// ..t..."..%,, 0455 „...1.7,oiltwoodeio,_ 6. • • -• ..it ,..-,, 1,-;:,/I,'.:'',.,.:.7::-.,':...': ii.-... •. 4 -A'''* ir.st.. c.i-_:"I:T". : •-• :- -.. .. ,;:* girlg,i1F,41 .... /1 ..., 4,4 A-•:.c.' '.,-Ail•tql114% * ,A4rik A . . TagOgggC f ':o4!:," // os. .;*:.:1, . *.''''''''7--;"<r.z.'llp.-A . 4/„, cc- -omit et, =,-.,,-r.:.,1•0.,,,,,...,7:-..-• ..... i. ' . , 4,.''...7011:r44,,, 311• i•,•,-950g.94°Ig ',7'i 'I'pi ' ::1';. _ 1 4/-." i 44, w,..r illie) p'‘' '2:':'',1!:'1.,7-.:'::-:.':' .‘. ' '-''' ''' • -4,it,-4., i P ‘ ih..7., .t /.4 ... ,, .•.• .11,244 .1.1, ,,„, , ,• ..•,.„,•.....:.• • • ., •- 4°'Z' 1 z cn _ i 4 .: . ..4 F/Aii - ,ti•-• 7 p;?.,..,.. ,‘... ..,,tmlii . 4 LT.44 s....-..:,,,,- . :-:7 P?•,A1- ° - — ,,.. . • 2 '-it a r , . ,..,. .fr peqt,,,,i.„ire...A.7...k-4i1.:,- -Ay- .4 it, ... ,_-,.•:-,.. .,. ,.._ ::.. •...•.,-.,-_-,.... .. .. -.- -• •- • -, -- ' "-N.:- 6, i 8 4 c ,. :,•-..--.:_.:,;:,:c..::_ ,... :• , . ,....-- 41.1' i I .1 ,g''' /. • 1 ,..... .:i.iii-4. , , _.,...,,, A 44, _- ., "ii 4 fit , _ . , 4 ,. "7,... . _• . .._.._ . ... ; 1:a. / ......,,,,,,,Liar.,44,4,„,,,-.. -...,:,,..1...r,[-arAtti,u, ../...0.• 6...6 ,s+, * _w 4%, :ir 1-. .,,, .,:, ,....2,. • ..., -,-.: 4e, 04 1 4 ' 7. /if,-‘11.o.7.1)r 041.14N-7.& ,e.414it •oil/ 4 . ..t..-' , x , ' .- • ' 1- ,.....Awl ifr\ '.•f,..*1- '',40V--s J 04 7 o '- giiii,sre i.:-. , :-•:i. .,:%_,.::;-.-, -,, 4 , PC* • 'r Vf ' -,,.„,. :. .• . .. . . -. '7,A •;,-,, a,7006d,...1:-..i 7,.;.-. .''....-'.-' ,-,'''':..-'' • 4,- -i 04 . 4 '''.::',.;',. '..':,...".. :-- ......,.. :,..-:-.1!-.:,.---I Ca, tc .. . . ,. _pc, . IN ' '. ,,y 4 '.'..'7‘...-.'::';',-.r.,...--........:..:.- --.:‘,:-,1 :•:,,.* x''' '111.1*'' 111.44'-., :'. '.• ..:0 .L4 Ag 3;C 1..4 -.a, V • ii. . . .. , .,,, _ii.. -. 0# As :.:,=:::,.,.:;:-:-,:-:.-.:.,::..--.;.:-;..:..,, -.- J Mao, •-• ., ,., ' .., - ,. , .. :6 ,..;:/ . P,.„-:'r.,-1 i. .' -- ". „4'-' ` - '.',...„., • .(4.,"- -• , .....„,....• -.. .:... ...-,,...... . . . .. • 0_ r, • ,,,,17 1, e'. ,!.,,IIIMMI 2:'.:..-.',.,-, c.-.....,.v.._ iir;::,..-.. ,7,a ,.,...A , - . RA 01', i-• =4:\A: .,*:i'',:• ::.---'2T. ' 1 :33.8'0,- ''''1--"? • ' .."- __.,..;.:.,_: 7-, -i,,.. .. • ..-... - -94 IF4:t • ..... . ... p . --,• • . -• - F./- '-- 40 ' 11?., 4 4 . . „ 46, ‘.. _216,... -.• •A-A.,4i •' '''-'• \ • , . - '.,•=- ;1, fil • • '44 \ - -"..-- '::' -' '-' "-vivo 1.4r4 (:D- J.,,-:.,..„ .,-- ...,-.;----7--t;---:,-;-- ---t--.:'--. m i .,, 4? 40,„‘... It....,,-,. ,_ .-._,.. , ' ...•,.: • : , ' 4. . •.„,, , ,. - : ' ' r° 4/ JA- - 4 ti----_-----M-'- :,...,. '.. .-.....--.- .. .., .•,.:x .-. :-.. • ,. - , lk.2,:, $4.1( A .-r_ .---=7:,-_-_-_-_.----=:..:4-_,-=:,'.--,'.4 - ---- -,- ' . --'---.,. •-- .,--. kg.'''.:'., . .4,...\le-40 Ole-, 1'-..,---,...,..;--, . .-':-7;' ..-.: .-i--i, iv. .--,„„0.7.-_-=,----___. „..... s ::.,•.... , •. .. „- : .,.....;..:. ,,T.-: i v0-• , ,0‘-‘,.,-,ip, • . . ,,, ,------,4 • 0,.. ..___=---_,..-..-..-..-..--.. . • ., .... • ... ., ,-...., .,-- • ,iiii, g d•;1 i, u cfpAi v-, u: :-.--,:i:::','.::._-:;:.. ,.; :, -. .;:-_,41(`-%...3.,.,*,.:..;\&_\.( of *c*1„------------ :•,':::.-..,-,';.,,';-r,'-=:..;,,;--1,:-:,.'-:','..'...-:,,:=:'.,:-,-..:..,.'::-:;:,-.."::::,7::'.-:::-..,--: -:,..',.. -,.....}di . i..-.-. :: N.--s.,,,,,,pri . . 6_, - •- - • - -- %moat'. .,t, Nip' :Air%.- -...-::: I),IkVi.e.4,-,Ai:,,::r7.::5..r.-:1.k ., ,4 W-.____=--,---_-_-..._.-.,,',41, ; ',,,,,,r,-._,,,-., .-.,:-...., -;: .•..-.:,'..'• Efi tn,.....,..._11k.:41, (:)q A) ii. f..0,.4-*-4,.‹... ..*. ;;;;111,!, _Ait:ee._,-/ATP:if:i.;":1 *- Ai'-=-__=-.-_-=---.....-_,-_------kitv.z-i-‘--%------:,::2-*-,-. :-.--:- ,..-`., •-.• -- •-•-. 44 - —'-';'7'' .47 --.‘ 1.-..k.:?/%%....•17%.1' . :--'1•Pil-?...::::-: -..:, ,-/sr-t..1% \W---K--,:-- -='-'-':.':.,...-;,:,-2: 1--. ,••• 7..:,.-..-:, -- 4iiigkg,pRii A.-__ -.•••:,--•--,-:-----,::,,-. -- itt--,.;T•:;...)„--.7.--,:T...:i,- -•;:---7----,.::.:Az---A**-------ff______- ----------0-- La ttl (41411 'Ai" 411....-44r-...:..; I.-: :.-:-: ieft .",.-.41111T___IrAIAW .i:;.;:•::::.:...:,:::•:,..,::::.:;.4.ii,:a .% 1----1_.:----_--_______,-.;:----=---;77 f.i) \---,-.,..4.,,,.,,i.:,,..,., 11.____ !,,*.• nt, ilicti.k $. ,__-,,, . ., ., s. . ,„„ .,?.... .. ,...,,,,,..,,, 4„....::,.„.._....,,,.•,.•...• -......,\ iiiii , ...,..-_-4-.__= .. .... .. .., ,,,_ 111 i:..•::. :,-.4.0(4,..-. .-:-.7„:..71/4.,..:45am PA ,,-,--1,,,:ii1-•-',',--:-.::,._'..:::::;:.-:.;:::`1,,,,,--_.--'_..--,---_,----_.----------.-_,------,----- --' .1... .,.....___..„..- . . .. ...., •.• ., • .:3 P•• , • r . ,..,,,, . 0 . ,i„,.:.:.• , -.......,-,, ,,-....., ......„ _h cl I h....„.......041/ , . .. .- .__410/4p.......4i, ..-..".`.--. .. ,..-:'.. 7-"i:-.;:-.--.... .;. .;.:"- --;!..---:::-------:----•-=7-=7-_-7::: P:1 )',., - 8 ....C. 44 ' • o ..,...., .....,,,,,e..„.,.....„ttiws; .; ,':. ."4:•.-714„:=-.7;---.7--=-----1----i, -.-- . ....•',..::,;:r.-..--. ..‘%,,,Y,,:-.`,'.----.. 3-411m :--, -.t2 1.„. i ,G g '- - A. t •,-.2 4,,,,, - -- 'i ...J.- ..- . ,• c ,.Apiimpt,. .!-.!,- „MiN8-a-1,-, ,,,,., ..,;(7,,--4,1'.',:,i;f•c.--..i • - ( 9, g-tzd. QD/gA SEATI 4 0 *fit207,:.„? ,_:,., :.0 irc.',;.,Tig-Ircliir.... ',..:---:-,...;:-.i \ ,..:.- h,........,..t....,....,. ..67.„).) ,, 0 1 .. 53 ),....itC1C43 .11M2X/MW 85a vs. AL,-.,k-,-..:,..-4,B ,wilitculpk.: ,:::11.71,-4--3710.-4,--.,,..-- --,..,\-73 w.xtkir--1,„” r4 K ), ,,,O) 1:672261171 a, i _MilliVA:',..,..4;le, . ..&,..\ar....iiit.441,2,;41 * 4 ,,- I i i: ,1.7 :. ,\,\R... -`,. . g --`,141,q31 I ',41 # ''‘*.AIZIlq7." ......til VA:•'-'.4/1 ki-t....-47-LI:Ap V t.'- -4.: •hr 2.„1, ti, 5,E 'Atli-I t.i 6:: ,,,.4. 's Alivir- 4, ilk/,---Nakkt... - 's.'t. iiiv••:111kidkirwr- 4, (--- , r i T''' t , ---, 1. o's.(8'31r•Imli.t, \ 4::',,,,,,>__., . _ %'-i.ft::A <4 '*,-,,iNti ''',........-...,',..# . p.,...,......;21rValril,..r. _1,,-,. ..-c--?...4.1 f ,4 I . j4ill.EX.Tilia .• ' gl: ,o,' '. eiot. I ig. 5.7:61rcg, h g it, v. , „,...,4„-..-.-...„1.°F,.,,------.;:,?....... ,-x v.-.. Co ., 11,4:'MINgUligile -, --- \ \ - .411-11,... N ,,,,:iii:'!"',:if4,T,727,7S141,i, '4.'.*V.:1,.,, L di '14271fiiiniiiiii.CA. ')-- em ) r,-, r.izit.lk:5 ..,\ ;,:44,01,:...;...:_tl.,": ;,:s.7,:ii.:1,17,4:.17-''..4.,n...,..7.,. i...1.7.,..,.. .,:7e._L.,, ,x1(71L, -. ..41 aliral.,1116Clary; ),..7 - -11....:: „...., „,,,,,.,;.,„,:,,,,,,..,,,,,,,,,„,,,,.., -...„....„. ), ,,,,,,,,,,k,„....„- ,„*. 7 ) i /C.'....- .,-,.;,71,;'d"Iko; ` -----'-'1 -t9 Jr*, Int vf ...-_, _. -,.. \, - 4 t,tz ..q..., ' \ \ ' , ...... .... OC ...., ....... N. 1 ) '1,;:\ ,c)‘ -77---#,:i4t,p,7--:.-,_,..f., - ....-.-,z4t, • ....-•••••......, , , _ ( _____, n4.4 -\ ,,,,,:..-4,4 re.,,v,v,•••-i::,-...'lil‘kf.....1,4i-:- ,...g,,,,-...4.t.-- , -4will_l_IBIlbailZtri .,.44.. :. firf.,---, -__,. ,, r!,,--cs tmo \ j t...53..:7;..::4:-....,,',14,.=3,,,,,.:::',',.-:',.aii....1F..a.:::, **_'.•li A, .','.4...,.:-:ttgl..."..... iiraii..... ir „/...i, et, - ,...,, .,-- ,. ti-,;:',,I• -,,.-,,,_ 0 .,. -°,7%4,..,?-.7--,t---..N,,,,,,,,,,„ii,,,,,,, .!, ,i ( ,. ...,.., ._ \ , (7.- \ / ,.....-.•,-;.,-;:f..1„:-,;„••.:1-,---,-,;•-',.:'•'.-7..„.-:.,,,,,i,..,•-•gr, ;.-4„. .-.:,-:.,•:.,,- _ ..., ,: .N.00.i,!Nry132,95 -,-.". • - ..13 SIP .;-' A .t, .‘,,,,t:.',.,.,.,.,',',„..,..: •,.....:.., .; ,-,:4,:xL.4..i.: ',,.-- .......,, ..•.:,..: :,;,,,...„....1.::-...-.., lkisk\\,'--_--- 1(77-------s* 7,-.7 , • , 12 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: Sept. 1, 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Kathryn Cuvelier,Town Clerk SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING — APPROVAL OF APPLICATION OF SERIES 12 LIQUOR LICENSE — HARVEST MOON CHINESE RESTAURANT, 12985 NORTH ORACLE ROAD, STE. 125 SUMMARY: An application by Quincy Zhang has been submitted for a Series 12 liquor license at the Harvest Moon Chinese Restaurant to be located at 12985 North Oracle Road, Suite 125. In accordance with Section 4-201 of the Arizona Revised Statutes, the application was posted for 20 days commencing August 9, 1999 on the premises of the applicant's property. No protests were received during that time. Chief Wolff has conducted a background investigation on the applicant. He has found no derogatory information on the applicant, therefore, he has no objections to the approval of the Series 12 liquor license. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Liquor License Application 2. Memorandum from Police Department SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to approve the request for a Series 12 liquor license for Harvest Moon Chinese Restaurant, 12985 North Oracle Road, Suite 125. r•ep. ent ead own Manage ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR LICENSES & CONTROL 40,12rt,T,„ 800 W Waslzi.nzton 5th Floore.z...,_...;:,-,,i-�,.1", 400 W Con Gress #150 riPhoenix AZ 55007-2934 ° Tucson AZ 85701-1352 (602) 542-5141 (520) 628-6595 I ,r4 ° A 8= 28 APPLICATION FOR LIQUOR LICENSE off. a:PT. TUCRU" ;' TYPEINK OR PRINT WITH BLACK Notice: Effective Nov. 1,1997,All Owners,Agents,Partners,Stockholders,Officers,or Managers actively involved in the day to day operations of the business must attend a Department approved liquor law training course or provide proof of attendance within the last five years. See page 5 of the Liquor Licensing requirements. SECTION 1 This application is for a: SECTION 2 Type of ownership: ❑INTERIM PERMIT Complete Section 5 0 J.T.W.R.O.S. Complete Section 6 El NEW LICENSE Complete Sections 2,3,4,13,14,15,16,17 0 INDIVIDUAL Complete Section 6 ❑ PERSON TRANSFER(Bars&Liquor Stores ONLY) 0 PARTNERSHIP Complete Section 6 Complete Sections 2,3,4, 11,13, 15,16,17 0 CORPORATION Complete Section 7 ❑LOCATION TRANSFER(Bars and Liquor Stores ONLY) Pg LIMITED LIABILITY CO. Complete Section 7 Complete Sections 2,3,4, 12,13,15,16,17 0 CLUB Complete Section 8 ❑ PROBATE/WILL ASSIGNMENT/DIVORCE DECREE 0 GOVERNMENT Complete Section 10 Complete Sections 2,3,4,9, 13, 15,17(fee not required) 0 TRUST Complete Section 6 ❑GOVERNMENT Complete Sections 2,3,4, 10,13,15, 16, 17 0 OTHER Explain SECTION 3 Type of license and fees: LICENSE#: /2/c3 ?/:;J7 1. Type ofLicense: 2.Total fees attached: $ yd' APPLICATION FEE AND INTERIM PERMIT FEES (IF APPLICABLE)ARE NOT REFUNDABLE. A service fee of$25.00 will be charged for all dishonored checks(A.R.S.44.6852) SECTION 4 Applicant:(Alla applicants must complete this section) fi 03 V)6, -, PP PP P Mr. ''� ‘ 1. Applicant/Agent's Name:Ms. fit (' l.!i C L 1 2M-1 (Insert one name ONLY to appear on license) Last FirstMiddle tn 2. Corp./Parership/L.L.C.: RAP-_\,ec a \C C <'\ t . , Cu S 1-\IC L r L C (Exactly as it appears on Articles of Inc.or Articles of Org.) 3. Business Name: . : _ I %,„ CC _A k -r a.:=S ... q• 'Iv (Exactly as it appears on the exterior of premises) i ,4 4. Business Address: \ -)--C1 ^ , o C- ..eRN.,iso t t 6 1-2-, t l --L_ (Do not use PO Box Number) City UNIY Zip P 5. Business Phone:( ) `__S- 5 S_ 1 Residence Phone:( 6. Is the business located within the incorporated limits of the above city_of tomm? gIYES ONO 7. Mailing Address: 1 apt i 0 D6 , Of2O L {�'_iZ- t--)P % 4U k 1 .is City State Zip 8. Enter the amount paid for a 06,07,or 09 license: $ . (Price of License ONLY) DEPARTMENT USE ONLY Accepted by: Li/e Date: g Lic.# 02 0 2c,e/ l Fees: e Cl /J'' $ I 9? Application Interim Permit Agent Change Club F. Prints TOTAL PROCESSING AI'I'I.ICATIONS TAKES APPROXIMATELY 90 DAYS,ANI)CIRCUMSTANCES OFTEN RESULT IN A LONGER WAITING PERIOD. You ARE CAUTIONED REGARDING PLANS FOR A(:RAND OPEMNG,1 TC.,BEFORE FINAL APPROVAL AM)ISSUANCE OF THE LICENSE. LIC 0100 11/1998 *Disabled individuals requiring special accommodation,please call the Department. • SECTION 5 Interim Permit: 1. Ir you intend to operate business while your application is pending you will need an Interim Permit pursuant to A.R.S.4-203.()1. 2. There MUST be a valid license of the same type you are applying for currently issued to the location. 3. Enter the license number currently at the location. 4. Is the license currently in use? 0 YES psi NO It no.how lone has it been out of use? ATTACH THE LICENSE CURRENTLY ISSUED AT THE LOCATION TO THIS APPLICATION. ,declare that I am the CURRENT LICENSEE of the stated license and (Print full name) location. I have read this application and the contents and all statements are true,correct and complete. X ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME (Signature) this day of Day of Month Month Year My commissio .pires on: (Signature of NOTARY PUBLIC) / SECTION 6 Individual or Partnership Owners: EACH PERSON LISTED MUST SUBMIT A COMPLETED FORM "LIC0101", AN "APPLICANT" TYPE FINGERPRINT CARD, AND $24 FEE FOR EACH CARD. 1. Individual: Last First Middle %Owned Residence Address City State Zip Partnership Name:(Only the first partner listed will appear on license) General-Limited /Last First Middle %Owned Residence Address City State Zip ❑ ❑ °Ia ❑ ❑ %a ❑ ❑ %a ❑ ❑ %a (ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEET IF NECESSARY) 2. Is any person,other than the above,going to share in the profits/losses of the business? 0 YES 0 NO 2 SECTION 7 Corporation/Limited Liability Co.: EACH PERSON LISTED MUST SUBMIT A COMPLETED FORM "LIC0101", AN "APPLICANT" TYPE FINGERPRINT CARD, AND $24 FEE FOR EACH CARD. ❑ CORPORATION Complete questions 1,2,3,5, 6, 7,8. TE1 L.L.C. Complete questions 1,2,4,5, 6, 7 and attach copy of Articles of Org.and Operation Agreement. , w ^ C 1. Name of Cor poration/L.L.C.: f� � Cci C 1 -L , (Exactly as it appears on Articles of Inc.or Articles of Org.) �.t1'� I tk/C 2. Date Incorporated/Organized: - Z-4- - ct 9 State where Incorporated/Organized: 1''�-t Z-�•�r 3. AZ Corporation Commission File No.: Date authorized to do business in AZ: 4. AZ L.L.C.File No: P?- Date authorized to do business in AZ: 5. Is Corp./L.L.C.non-profit? ❑ YES RNO If yes,give IRS tax exempt number: 6. List all directors/officers in Corporation/L.L.C.: Last First Muddle Title Residence Address City State Zip mail/A1 .( �t•-)(CI 12 0 MerlAf.)a, / .7cccoki Z1'1415C7 M - , tbitA10 f(pi tf-L,3c-N (ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEET IF NECESSARY) 7. List stockholders or controlling members owning 10%or more: Last First Middle %Owned Residence Address City State Zip -co% t 3Cr3I W . Sur l4 m c % 36R � to, Su&)(0./AP. 1ucoA (ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEET IF NECESSARY) 8. If the corporation/L.L.C.is owned by another entity,attach an ownership,and director/officer/members disclosure for the parent entity. Attach additional sheets as necessary in order to disclose real people. SECTION 8 Club Applicants: EACH PERSON LISTED MUST SUBMIT A COMPLETED FORM "LIC0101", AN "APPLICANT" TYPE FINGERPRINT CARD, AND $24 FEE FOR EACH CARD. 1. Name of Club: Date Chartered: (Exactly as it appears on Club Charter) (Attach a copy of Club Charter) 2. Is club non-profit? 0 YES 0 NO If yes,give IRS tax exempt number: 3. List officer and directors: Last First Middle Title Residence Address City State Zip - G (A'ITACI I ADDITIONAL SI IEET IF NECESSARY) 3 SECTION 9 Probate,Will Assignment or Divorce Decree of an existing Bar or Liquor Store: l. Current Licensee's Name: (Exactly as it appears on license) - Last Rist Middle 2. Assignee's Name: Last First Middle 3. License Type: License Number: Date of Last Renewal: 4. ATTACH TO THIS APPLICATION A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE WILL, PROBATE DISTRIBUTION INSTRUMENT, OR DIVORCE DECREE THAT SPECIFICALLY DISTRIBUTES THE LIQUOR LICENSE TO THE ASSIGNEE TO THIS APPLICATION. SECTION 10 Government: (for cities,towns, or counties only) 1. Person to administer this license: Last First Middle 2. Assignees Name: Last First Middle A SEPARATE LICENSE MUST BE OBTAINED FOR EACH PREMISES FROM WHICH SPIRITUOUS LIQUOR IS SERVED. SECTION 11 Person to Person Transfer: Questions to be completed by CURRENT LICENSEE(Bars and Liquor Stores ONLY). 1. Current Licensee's Name: Entity: (Exactly as it appears on license) Last First Middle (Indiv.,Agent,etc.) 2. Corporation/L.L.C.Name: (Exactly as it appears on license) 3. Current Business Name: (Exactly as it appears on license) 4. Current Business Address: 5. License Type: License Number: Last Renewal Date: 6. Current Mailing Address(other than business): 7. Have all creditors,lien holders,interest holders,etc.been notified of this transfer? 0 YES 0 NO 8. applicantoperate Does the intend to o erate the business while this application is pending? 0 YES 0 NO If yes,complete section 5,attach fee,and current license to this application. 9. I hereby relinquish my rights to the above described license to the applicant named in this application and hereby declare that the statements made in this section are true,correct and complete. I, ,declare that I am the CURRENT LICENSEE of the stated license. I have read this (Print full name) ` -� :, ti,- : .. -.1 application and the contents and all statements are true,correct and cornr,ete 4iq. OFFICIAL SE. L .,.."._°. PAULA M.DELGADO G r .r; a,C i' ,,4 :. , ' 4' ',_��i �Eri�REME X . r ignature of ENT LICENSEE) c�• ' CI �� :, p,.,2:��� rli-F1 this e••"•:....at♦.:•'•....:::.-..-z-z- - -" ' 1 ---...:`•. ....�....�•�ir iliffry .. Year Day of Month �' • commission ex ires on: �•I '- �� Ai/ da-6---------- r��'ie �.. � My p (Signature of NOTAR PMJBLI 4 SECTION 12 Location to Location Transfer: (Bars and Liquor Stores ONLY) APPLICANTS CANNOT OPERATE UNDER A LOCATION TRANSFER UNTIL IT IS APPROVED BY THE STATE. 1 "urrent Business Name and Address: cactly as it appears on license) 2. New Business Name and Address: (Do not use PO Box Number) 3. license Type: license Number. Last Renewal Date: 4. What date do you plan to move? What date do you plan to open? SECTION 13 Questions for all in-state applicants: 1� �' Ceyy tt LeS-c \ c 1. Distance to nearest school: � N `fit. Name/Address of school: � �� Nit�Q (regardless of distance) \kft ?---eCt& 2. Distance to nearest church: 41i LC-M. Name/Address of church: . - .,eimm;.amai«„ _i _lier (regardless of distance) ,/.114.1-4- GA--A IN - _ CATH CLIC C.(4641 3. I am the: LEssEE 0 SUBLESSEE 0 OWNER 0 PURCHASER(of premises) 14-3(0 �. . Of2A-GLg . 1 _ • the premises is leased give lessors name i ) Q and address. 1 � '� o � �I �0( Co �►�� �c-•D�. �� Zl ��C �1�21 t$-7( Monthly rental/lease rate$ Z, SOC ,00 5. What is the total business indebtedness of the applicant for this license/location? $ Does any one creditor represent more than 10%of that sum? 0 YES tin NO If yes,list below. Total must equal 100%. Last First Middle %Owed Residence Address City State Zip (ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEET IF NECESSARY) 6. What of business will this license be used for?(BE SPECIFIC) Q �A t�. type SEC C) t?� Ab 7. Has a license,or a transfer license for the premises on this application been denied by the state within the past one(1)year? 0 YES p,NO If yes,attach explanation. 8. Does any spirituous liquor manufacturer,wholesaler,or employee,have any interest in your business? ❑YESgJ NO 9. Is the premises currently licensed with a liquor license? 0 YES rig NO If yes,give license number and licensee's name: (Exactly as it appears on license) -- 5 SECTION 14 Restaurant, or Hotel-Motel Applicants: I I. Is there a valid restaurant or hotel-motel license at the proposed location? 0 YES lig NO If yes.give licensee's name: and license#: --' L ist First Middle 2. If the answer to Question 1 is YES,you may qualify for an Interim Permit to operate while your application is pending;consult A.R.S.Section 4-203.01;and complete Section 5 of this application. 3. All restaurant applicants must complete a Restaurant Operation Plan(Form LICO 114)provided by the Department of Liquor. 4. Doy ou understand that 40% of your annual gross revenue must be from food sales? YES 0 NO SECTION 15 Diagram of Premises: (Blueprints not accepted,diagram must be on this form) 1. Check ALL boxes that apply to your licensed premises: Entrances/Exits En Liquor storage areas ❑ Drive-in windows 0 Patio enclosures ❑ Service windows 0 Under construction:estimated completion date 2. Restaurants and Hotel/Motel applicants must explicitly depict kitchen equipment and dining facilities. 3. The diagram below is the only area where spirituous liquor is to be sold,served,consumed,dispensed,possessed,or stored. Give the square footage or outside dimensions of the licensed premises. DO NOT INCLUDE PARKING LOTS,LIVING QUARTERS,ETC. 5k..:i t-E. I a-C / 1 6 OCD •irissc (- - /- ,-, 7 ,-, Z. i-—a •-- - :./..--i - :V,... ' -. ! i —. ft-- —--.- 4 ' - a -, 1 - i'f.'i -77 _ ! 1 ----.---4----.... . 1 --0- - ' .. \ it , .-,.g---------'%•77—;:--1,---CT,e 4171N,I. . _ ".1;.-...',..: ....,...,-.: ....._ - A• • ';) -- ..... . 2 ' ,p, 6 - ., . • . ..4 . ) • . . • ?/-6.-).), . - ;. • . to - _ ,1 ...-rr: , ,— k4) . ' 0 0 0 0 . '"2'' 2 7, _ — -:eoe.T/. ---/5.,‘' .,3 \a) '). 4.2; ‹J * 4t) - 5--v , • 1j ._.4 _S _ 3 vp,_w .; . .....r .21 . ' 4,\ f:77:_ r; 7imo ' , q�_J_.‘1. _' any, 1 C2c,,o. 0 '� 4. 'i -' - tea, u,''c i kio �0 r . , 2..:.. . ri ,.W.7' 0"' ... — tr.,, 0. ;id . --., ... .... _,.,- 1-... .,-.1---. -' lv Er. • Q J z. v • :-.: ��..�. I - • '-, i I OIT'y Jet , _____ • •...,.....„. (--, \ , , . , ,„ Lu\ N,',..1 .,4..„ - -Ici ;.s...12. 1 p. t:', i' ----C >41 ' 1141 -I--j il, Chi ?h,%• . ,-7,7 1 „. ,.:Nc_ Kr,.4. . — s t �• ,- . <(1- J; 1 a 1 f i'j: 1 1 • dc-& -----.' , ' ,, r • •4 . .- it, ..7:::t '000i •�7 u 1 to .3-•-•,-i ii7i, •_ ,.tc•'71 . ,.. 4., -. * i'isi •":' v , 1 1 i . eika. t. �.. •.�F ` V'T ••� •j •�. , :fire 11 ��.. '� �, ,� ,,,,f�.� WILIND6: , �► •est • _-.,...... ....1.-7,::..,.,• — • ---..r.,,t, ......,,,,..-,....v.ik— -••••ii.-P-.:-c• .., ;:,:::,-?... ..2*(Z.F.-ya,. YOU MUST NOTIFY THE DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR OF ANY CHANGES OF BOUNDARIE ENTRANCES, EXITS, OR SERVICE WINDOWS MADE AFTER SUBMISSION OF THIS DIAGRAM. 6 ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR LICENSES CONTROL .`�y;l?l��r�v 1111/ , 800 W Washington 5th Floor 40() W Congress #150 Tucson AZ 85701-1352 Phoenix AZ 85007-2934 \;�,� �. , ,,� (602) 542-5141 (520) 628-6595 Nqg juL ,A 8: 2ci LID. DEPT. TUCSü`�, ,' RESTAURANT OPERATION PLAN LICENSE# /2/63(9 Fki 1. List by Make. Model and Capacity of your: Grill SC=ft Oven Z tuRt4era_ STo /epiSti.1(4\ c P_ Freezer 3 boo?.-- Refrigerator c - Refrigerator V\1:41Lnq ac a1EC— Sink ec +4 S W&v. tte 3 CC ISA- Dish t �4t2 'I ,tom P Dish Washing B42_ S r (_ Facilities OtORft( iS r ,cCvy Food Preparation • (Dimensions) ( i� . A [esc �� CounterT, T S��c 1� � � Other te: CP„,^,`t.IGIE 2. Print the name of your restaurant: AkAV_S -Ac� c_us4 3. Attach a copy of your menu (Breakfast, Lunch and Dinner including prices). 4. List the seating capacity for: ► -;J:Za7,,0 'U.,J gek41'V` ;;r:- ,& !2(-:- p Le a. Restaurant area of your premises [ b. Bar area of your premises [ + c. Total area of our premises [ `���°I-�'-1] Y 5. What type of dinnerware and utensils are utilized within your restaurant? 1 Reusable 0 Disposable 6. Does your restaurant have a bar area that is distinct and separate from the restaurant seating? (If yes, what percentage of the public floor space does this area cover). ' Ye• % 1 No 5-e+r,;-t-a-cC4-'-cet'efEE 7. What percentage of your public premises is used primarily for restaurant dining? (Does not include kitchen, bar, cocktail tables or game area.) I SU % 62--t `Disabled individuals requiring special accommodations,please call the Department. I.ic01I411/I994 8. Doesy our restaurant Contain any games or television'? 0 Yes lia No (If yes, what types and how many'? Pool tables, Video Games, Darts, etc.) 9. Do you have live entertainment or dancing? 0 Yes Ell No (If yes, what type and how often?) 10. Use space below or attach a list of employee positions and their duties to fully staff your business.-7 i</77-CAe7(/ /n( , ihEr2-') 1 AS,Ci-kvr-r-i Pe_-11D eiok s, gl.ivtii,__) /1 &,),,ei-c17s - I - eA7,?---iz,zi-/ 7 .) , Z-___ ,4/2_--k/vrti-ex_i fifIxd-it, c-c-- )/9.-5//vt--lx / 6(14 /-77L-elar 180--s--.AELL) . I • I, ( ((I AfC L 7 W4 f ,.hereby declare that I am the APPLICANT filing this application. I have Print full name) read theis application and the contents and all statements true,correct and complete. -"\,ti1 l -,,-LACKNOWL '_ D BEFORE ME X �. � , (Si'nature of APP/‘ANT) �� /, l this __ day of , Day. M. th Year My / ,e__. ' /zA ,,, ,e, commission expires on:: /1), ,c)Z(....R .)() p PUBLIC) t. attire of � � 'N� Y PUB ) 2 (Ara.) OFFICIAL SEAL, f :.r- PAULA M.DELGADO 1? NOTARY PUBLIC-ARIZONA 1 P(.. • . -e'. .. . IMA COUNTY 1 My Comm.Expires Feb.28,2000 2 /;770.Z 1959 JUL -Q H,� V 1:ST MOON CHINESE�. 29 E C U S I N E JQ. DEPT 12985 N Oracle 85737 . suite 125 TL,CSr 825-5351 Businese hour : Mon- FRi 11 : 00-9 : 00 sat&Sun 12 :00-900 LUNCH SPECIALS S RVED DAILY UNTIL 3 : 00 Include ec 7 roll • ori VL c' t 'i .262_ 61-1,c,i,vgt-kcoup. J�J Ercccc Z; eel G Y' c:hick-enMtc &cc �i ;t, pa n 4 ? ,ctAiQe-t cincd < r c fcke i 8e+ Se 'czm e c cl? iCkei 6,60 QC:ci t, c'hc i/k) iLI�,p L c mn 5.5-1) Vc(3e:tales De/kxe citel.=17 . ciPaii1/43e. Ri;ibt1/4311 A; .rit6/1 ti) LEL3sr€,/r �c�uc�, . A-ppetiz6i-s z C2( , etalte - • .2 do . Rack Triss2.1 won ��� • -276goctst Ba41 716- Cr0-13 cAhlig43,0 pct • 550 pti. ptt -F-or TOW, - - s - - . .25- Cpw-- pc.e7,con 2 y 1Ra 2 CCL. F6166 2 s h r,,,yi p FeFc' cb,- �hvJ 6cck Wpb : Pk " i i-3�,� PORK SWEET AND SOUR PORK************************4 . 95 6 . 95 -'� tender pork, deep fried then cooked in sweet and sour sauce. 1' YU SHIANG PORK*****************************4 .95 6 .95 shredded pork, green onion , waterchestnuts mushroom stir fried with spicy saued . ****************************** � 13:7goo sHu PORK 4 . 95 6 .95 ),\ shredded pork and chinese vegetable served with thin pancakes . POR K WITH SNOW PEAS**********************5 . 25 7 . 25 °:7F !s. 1. ` - tender pork slices delicately cooked with �- fresh snow peas and carrot . 'HuNAN PORK********************************4 .95 - _6_.95 slice--tender pork mushroom bamboo 1 onion--bel-l-peppers and carrots . ,; 12- ' ~ JP6RK WITH EGG PLANT***********************5 . 25 7 . 25 stir fried egg plant with onions and served vismia‘sz,mar on hot iron plate. YS.: 1,v l ,� J • /r,q CI!TdKEN ____,, ' .------1(-- ( ' ---- SIZZLING RICE CHICKEN******************* k� ,-_ �- H.-. 4 '- -t;Ll _ 1 TENDER SLICED CHICKEN , BROCCOLI , ,/,_ CABBAGE BAMBOO , WATER CHESTNUT, 7CARROTS 4---,:.46 opt- STRAW MUSHROOM, SNOW PEAS , CRISPY RICE ON THE HOT PLATE . P . 7 1_. MONGLIN CHICKEN************** ***********�' 1 I<a --, - sliced chicken sauted with onions and \ V served over crispy rice noodle . SESAME CHICKEN*************************** :-�-� 7 .95 � `-�-. �' CRISPY SLICED CHICKEN WITH SPECIAL SAUCE ‘ - AND TOPED WITH SESAME SEEDS . 44..., .= ORANGE CHICKEN***************************5,-9-5 7 .95 /: , ,,�" SLIED CHICKEN IN BATER SAUTEED WITH ORANGE PEELS WITH SPECIAL ORANGE FAVOR SAUCE . -t-,--"2L/F- TRIPLE MUSHROOM CHICKEN******************i:95 .... 7 .. , /, _,5 L " sliced chicken , black mushroom, straw i MUSHROOM, FRESH MUSHROOM, SNOW PEAS , . 15r• M:,--.J., BAMBOO AND WATER CHESTANT IN BROWN SAUCE . CHICKEN WITH BLACK BEAN SAUCE*************5 . 95 —7,2, 5-' �'"=_ . , sliced chicken, bell pepper , onions and . r black bean . V /1-....---' -- v GENERAL TSO ' S CHICKEN*********************�:-7 6 . 75 T ‹, s�'liced ;hicke,n, bell p pper ,_carrots , I J -- , i ,_. / _ celery in speciate hot--same . �' 1-r‘tz-Q, CA,_ s.iv t .:;77, St,'-'\--('".• `^ u ************************** ���-. KUNG PAO C,.I CKEN 4--�-5 6 . 95 diced chicken , bamboo , water- chestnuts , '4 'r-' bell pepper , green onion and peanuts . r ` r sauteed in special hot sauce Ir- cashew chicken ***************************495 6 . 95 . qf ?- ‘' -�-�.� celery , carrpts . greeny leas and cashewnuts chicken , water-chestnuts , bamboo , TY in brown sauce . ?? , Aft, DAl CHICKEN****************************4 . 95 6 . 95 dic chicken, wate uts , bamboo , celery' carro reen peas and almonds in whit/s~aGce - CHICKEN WITH SNOW PEAS ******************5 . 25 7 . 25 � � 1, � slied chicken •am.00 water chestnuts . ,, � snow ^ Per�s , carrot-s 1 .;5",• M00 GOO GAI PAN****************************5 . 25 sliced chicken, fresh mushroom, bamboo , broccoli and carrots in white sauce. ) x -� SWEET AND SOUR CHICKEN**********************4 . 95 L 5 6 . 95 deep fried chicken with pineaple ,pepper and onion in sweer and sour sauce. LEMON CHICKEN****************************** 4 . 95 6 .9 5 ` -.,,� deep fried chicken in our special lemon sauce \ . **********************HALF**7. 95 WHOLE 14 .99 B.B.Q .DUCK****************************HALF***8 . 50 WHOLE 15 . 9999 DUO WITH , NOW PEAS****************** ;-q5 bone e RQ. _��CK WHIH SNOW PEAS, CE-LEHYT and onions . ck • SEAFOOD }' i HONEY WALNUT SHRIMP**************************7 , 95 9 . 95 K.,,L):7-\ JUMBO SHRIMP , SAUTEED WITH I H SPECIAL WHITE CREAM SAUCE , SURROUNDED WITH HONEY WALMUTS . -i- tt, ` SESAME SHRIMP*********************************6 .95 8 .95 crispy shrimp cooked with special hot spicy --._ sauce and topped with sesame seeds . SIZZLING RICE SHRIMP**************************6 . 95 8 . 95 fL.!..i r R - shrim p ,br occoli ,bamboo shoot , snow peas , water- chestnut , carrots , baby corn and golden rice ccrust served on hot iron plate. �.-- SCALLOPS WITH SNOW PEAS***********************6 . 95 8 .95 scallops , snow peas , carrots , water-chestnuts f I\ bamboo shoots . shrimp with snow peas************************6 , 95. 8 . 95 C shrimp snow peas , carrots , water-c strut I bamboo shoots . j� '--2-#-`);',?" WITH LOBSTER S AUCE******* **************o .g5 8 . 95 4' �./ , shrimp , onion, bell pepper , black ITt7214073.rjegg in special sauce . SHRIMP WITH TOFU****************************6 , 95 8 . 95 -7-2;7-7TI choping shrimp stir fried with chef specil ..!— ON sauce on the tofu. CASHEW SHRIMP********************************5 . 05 7 . 95 til-?,r Q shrimp , diced bamboo , water-chestnuts , celery ( 1' ? A ,, carrots , green pea- , cashew nuts . Nif KUNG PO SHRIMP*****************************5 . 95 7 . 95 /1 .0 diced bamboo , water-chestnuts , 1f- • celery carrots , � s ea reen peanuts . g p CURRY SHRIMP********************************5 . 95 7 . 95 (Z2 — t - shrimp , onion ,carrot bell pepper .sauteed in '� 5 a special curry sauce . cs;2 , / r, ,..., ,, , ,i,\.,,,, ,,,.,f, 'h�l 'y CHEF'S SPECIALS 11 WE SERVE STEAMED WHITE RICE :\ PINT LARGE. LOBSTER , SHRIMP AND SCALLOPS ********************* 10 . 95 14 . 95 /‘� lobster shrimp and scallops with broccoli fresh --k mushroom baby corn and carrots . i 1 SIZZLING SEAFOOD COMBINATION*********************7 . 95 g- scallops shrimp, crabmeat , stir fried and mixed vegetables on a sizzling hot plate CRISPY SHRIMP WITH SPICY SALTS* ww **!T*-F}''T a.**7 . 95 9 . 95 DEEP 'FRIED SHRIMP WITH SHELL ON OR SHELL OUT �- -� SAUTED IN A SPECIAL SPICY SALT BEEF STEAK WITH BLACK PEPPER*********************6 .95 8 .95 A THICK SIRLOIN STEAK, PAN FRIED WITH ONION BLACK -- '� PEPPER INOUR CHEF ' S SPECIAL STEAK SAUCE , � P KING STYLE PORK CHOP*****************************6, 8 . 95 -DEEP FRIED PORK CHOP IN SPECIAL PEKING SAUCE/0-1 91- = MONGOLIAN COMBINATION******************************5 . 95 ( shrimp, chicken , beef stir fried with green onion and served on top of crispy rice noodles C! - 1.-7 KUNG PAO COMBINATION******************************5 .95 7 . 95 F '`--"/"(j' , SHRIMP , CHICKEN, BEEF STIR FRIED WITH DICED BAMBOOD WATER-CHESTNUTS BELL PEPPER, PEANUTS IN SPECIAL HOT SAUCE . L ORANGE ROUGHY WITH VEGETABES*********************7 . 95 9 . 95 orane roughy stir fried w�th mixed vegetables . •_ S �.1,V'L�� •fit '�v ,/V1 v�'1'� , • ....ti�r - J MU SHU COMBINATION********************************5 . 95 7 . 95 - SHR Iii W, C ICKEN,v'EEF , SHREDDED CABBAGE , BAMBOO , MUSH100M, WOOFER CARROTS , EGG AND GREET ONION SER ED WITH" HOISIN SAUED AND ( 4 )CHINESE PANCAKES . v L.4 %.4; SWEET SOUR COMBINATION **************************5 . 95 7 .95 - DEEP FRIED SHRIMP, CHICKEN, PORK WITH PINEAPLE, CARROTS , ONIONS , BELL PEPPER AND SWEET AND SOUR SAUCE �• A^ THE PHOENIX AND DRAGON **************************6 . 95 8 . 95 j SHRIMP CHICKEN . � ,$ B .O . PORK SNOWPEAS BROCCOLI , NAPPA, MUSHROOM AND HOUSE SPECIAL SAUCE IN A GOLDEN BASKET . I ( i r _ (-11 BEEF Served with steam rice PINT LARGE -, '( '1:1: . � SIZZLING BEEF**************************:�****5 , q5 x . 95 ' TANDEE BEEF , BROCCOLI CHINESE VEGETABLE MUSHROOM, BABY CORN .CARROTS SNOW PEA, NAPA SERVED ON HOT PLATE . 1-.. .. .'4._ •- NiMONGOLIAN BEEF*******************************5 . 95 7 . 95 fl' f SLICED TANDER BEEF COOKED WITH GREEN ONION AND BEDED ON SHREDED RICE NOODLES . -e... 4- SESAME BEEF*********************************5 , 95 7 . 95 z'PJT ;/J-T- DEEP FRIED TENDER BEEF SAUTEED WITH SPECIAL ' •^"•==' SAUCE AND TOPPED WITH SESAME . _ ORANGE E ********************************** L44' 5 . 95 7 . �5 .. sliced b of in batter sauteed with orange favor swee and sour sauce . / . J �l `��--- �T. � BEEF WITH SNOW PEAS *************************� , q� g'- - f l ---pc -1-_,,a_ SNOW PEA PODS , NAPA, MUSHROOM COOKED WITH TANDER BEEF . • TRIPLE MUSHROOM ******* 5 ' ' � WITH BEEF ************5 . 95 - *-. -Lt-- 4s- _ TENDER BEEF ,BLACK MUSHROOM , STRAWMUSHROOM ..::..- a , .-- FRESH MUSHROOM, SNOW PEAS BAMBOO SHOOTS , WATER-CHESTNUTS , CARROTS IN BROWN SAUCE -4.-'' BEEF WITH BROCCOLI************************** 4 . 95 4 . 95 6 . 95 �f f, l -- SERED WITH BROWN SAUCE \ r.\-, '': : N =--- ___.-- _, • PEPPER_ S-T_EAK***** *****,**************** :-;.•__..7-7,C _._.- BE,EF WI-T,H GREEN PEPPER , oNI4- --A.ZID--.,--_, ,-, --;-•-0 =7f . Sr..,-4 C-K---P-E-P R-E-�� .KUNG=--- �- IEEE*******************************4 . 95 6 . 95 ; __ ---___BEEF _f D_I,CED BAMBOO ,—WASE = 1 SAUTETED HOT--RE-D---PEPPERS t? 1,,, OYSTER -. SAUCE BEEF************************* . . 95 7. 9 5 --: sliced beef—in -oyster sauce withr on- s ./Q:). 1'• _- . CURRY BEEF*********************** ********,4 . 95 : 6=ip-- 4.12Cilt-t _ SLICED BEEF BLENDED WITH BELL PEPPERS 1r'E& ppv AND ONIONS COOKED C-1-' IN A SPECIAL CURRY . SAUCE . ( :7-r- , q YU SHIANG BEEF*****************************5 , 95 SHREDDED TENDER BEER ,E . , GREEN ONIONS , CHOPPED WATER-CHESTNUTS AND MUSHROOMS STIR FRIED i t 22:— WITH SEASONED SPICY PEPPER SAUCE . - ._� r ri Stii- i-iii. (.: sPicti C -ivy' ';‘•) (-),, 7dre V'i,j c)._ Rit& (.. , of ,,,,jut .44:cs p /.,. iV',cc t 5 2S ‘`M— -1. i r hic( gQ.,e,i f Hc -F pi! 6FI cit R'cL 71 cod(-. . ) -7.---2-c-Z‘ s. .e r � l'- iii L 7 5 b.cis ,3-‘ -,_„,_____L____ _ , _, .-7- • --- ct----cci c:c---c-rn-, 1,1,—(--(,-.ti-T--, :-It/j----,5 6 3-1-1 ,71_________4-64•2=- 7, ,3 -1 _,_. . .,41 --- -_. ,,,-.,-, i C_67) r? a peri FrQc4 / OCt! , .... S E LL � ' il- CT ZT_C i cc:. Tec( /• (.... C H C t p,,-, cc.ft D-ritli‹c , . c C - /-106:_cc frij1" T-42,,, . Ai0 Citartj.-Q /V( i' ( k /. c ;: ciap 6.7/in.c,Q;ij 74 0 3 (,- f2,2p .(3.3.4,z.:6; C_- 6, fc€ e / Jire 1 "-ea, S giii-tft_ .5, 4A gi) 77 . 74'57 ." 11,,--7,0- Ij A1044 C GCl, L tet, �v���� �l7T-_::}^ � � � / p � G�.. 1. ('c. 4. C(Ark- (-C 0 0 cL- ti: c u-c p k'l .,.) SECTION 16 Geographical Data: A SAMPLE FOR THIS SECTION IS PROVIDED ON THE BACK OF THIS PAGE. List below the exact names of all churches,schools,and spirituous liquor outlets within a one half mile radius of your proposed location. (-iAklyest Kul, 1. t asp; 2. Ll1 LA ]TAL,,LS NT 3. 4EC1mx-57 tc5 4. Al_C e..e G s l�el(..R 1 5. $1 I !DA) 0 E Li o Ir 4t S 6. Ci-1 LL,P- JJ-1 , l�O() , c l'4d t .g o 11 s v 7. TSL A -to 4 c ,r 8. CA-114 Q f is� (.1.1 pi 12( 1---/ 9. f 38-0 ui i,KAL .- 'Z A , Ra 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. '"'TACH ADDITIONAL SHEET IF NECESSARY) A=Your business name and identify cross streets. SECTION 17 Signature Block: 6 1, G)(1,74LLI 7,1--/ 1 I 61 ,declare that: 1)I am the APPLICANT(Agent/Club Member/Partner),making this (Print name of APPLICANT/AGENT listed in Section 4 Question 1) application; 2)I have read the application and the contents and all statements are true,correct and complete; 3)that this application is not being g made to defraud or injure any creditor,taxing authority,regulatory authority,or transferor;4)that no other person,firm,or corporation,except rp , as indicated, has an interest in the spirituous liquor license for which these statements are made; and 5) that none of the owners, artners p , members,officers,directors or stockholders listed have been convicted of a felony in the past five(5)years. l '� t,, OFFICIAL SEAL 4 x /1,'ti r ��., PAULA M.DELGADOAC 0 (Signature) 1 NOTARY PUBLIC AAIZI rD BEFORE ME � kV PIMA COQ, 'T r 1 cit My ,/II ;I Ir..,..�, . Al 1 1 o• ./ c_ J' , 474 . Myie7-,-...-..--...-....-,-...-,-...-..,-....„,-,- -:, commission expires _' h, 9-2 �� / o 4 .4. -0,1reC Year _ J (Signature of '0''4' ' PUB L 7 SAMPLE • GEOGRAPHICAL DATA In the area adjacent to the map provided below indicates your proposed location and the exact names of all churches , schools , and alcoholic beverage outlets within a 1/2 mile radius of your proposed location. (See example below) A = Applicant Series 12 01 Pink Elephants Series 06 02 Mama' s Rest . Series 12 03 Corner Liquors Series 09 04 Joe ' s Groceries Series 10 05 Lions Club Series 14 06 Burgers R Us Series 07 07 Pizza Perfect Series 07 08 Billy Bobs Bar Series 06 1/2 Mi . 09 St . Anthonys Church Latrobe 10 St . Anthonys School 1 11 11 Burbank Middle School Lockwood , 4 2 7 �/ 1/ Mi . z mi . 2 First United Baptist1111111111111 1 Church 12 13 • P 8 14 10 15 A.R. S . Section 4-207 .A reads as follows : 1/2 Mi . A. No retailers license shall be issued for any premises which are. at the time the license application is received by the Director, within three hundred(300) horizontal feet of a church, within three hundred(300) horizontal feet of a publicor private rivate school building with kindergarten programs or any of grades one ( 1) through twelve (12 ) . or within three hundred (300 ) horizontal feet of a fenced recreational area adjacent to such school building. 8 `„—Lic." O 9 ,7 11000 N. La Canada Dr. Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 WERNER S. WOLFF, Chief of Police . ► Phone (520) 742-5474 FAX (520) 797-2616 41 . 1 vNoEo1 ORO VALLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT "INTEGRITY, PRIDE, EXCELLENCE" TO: WERNER WOLFF, CHIEF OF POLICE )2,.y..e , KATHRYN CUVELIER, TOWN CLERK FROM: SGT. CORONA di RE: BACKGROUND CHECK FOR LIQUOR LICENSE HARVEST MOON CHINESE RESTAURANT HARVEST MOON CHINESE CUISINE L.L.C. DATE: JULY 23, 1999 ON 07/23/99 I COMPLETED THE STANDARD BACKGROUND CHECK FOR HARVEST MOON CHINESE RESTAURANT/HARVEST MOON CHINESE CUISINE L.L.C., AND PRINCIPALS QUINCY, ZHOU, ZHANG AND MAN, LIN, ZANG. BACKGROUND CHECKS WERE QUERIED THROUGH PIMA COUNTY, STATE OF ARIONA, AND THE NATIONAL CRIME INFORMATION CENTER. QUINCY, ZHOU, ZHANG, AND MAN, LIN, ZHANG, HAVE NO CRIMINAL RECORD ON FILE WITH ANY OF THE LISTED CRIMINAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS. MR. AND MRS. ZANG HAVE BEEN RESIDENTS OF ARIZONA SINCE 7/8/87. ON 07/23/99 I SPOKE WITH JOHN SANDERS, SPECIAL INVESTIGATOR WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR LICENSES AND CONTROL. MR. SANDERS COMPLETED A FILE SEARCH ON THE PRINCIPALS ON 07/26/99; NO INFRACTIONS WERE FOUND. 13 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: September 1, 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Valerie Feuer, Senior Planner SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE (0)99 PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED, CHAPTER 3, CRITERIA, AS IT PERTAINS TO RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE AD HOC COMMITTEE ON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BACKGROUND: The Ad Hoc Committee for Development Review recommended to the Town Council a number of zoning code changes intended to improve the process for all parties involved, including Oro Valley citizens, the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Development Review Board, the Town Council, and the development community. Most of the recommendations for code changes have already been reviewed and approved. Design guidelines were reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission and approved by the Town Council on April 21, 1999. Changes to the criteria for use by the Development Review Board in Sec. 3-302 of OVZCR were dependent on adoption of the design guidelines. SUMMARY: The criteria in Section 3-302 provide general guidelines for the Development Review Board in considering applications for development review. The Ad Hoc Committee proposed that some additional language be added in some cases, that the Design Guidelines be referenced in other cases, and that one criterion be moved to a more appropriate location in the zoning code. Staff has reviewed the changes proposed two years ago, along with the recently adopted Design Guidelines and the comprehensive code amendments currently in progress. Since much of the current code language is now covered in more detail in Chapter 16, Design Guidelines, we are recommending deletion of the criteria that are covered elsewhere, along with a reference to Chapter 16. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ACTION: The Commission voted on August 3, 1999, by a 4-0 vote, to forward this item to Council recommending approval of the amendment to the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised, Chapter 3, as it pertains to recommendations of the Ad Hoc Committee on Development Review with the following revisions: Sec. 3-302 Criteria, paragraph C, strike "WITHIN" replace it with"CONSIDERING". TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 2 RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval of the attached amendments. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to approve the amendments to the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised, Chapter 3, Criteria, as it pertains to recommendations of the Ad Hoc Committee on Development Review. OR I move to approve the amendments to the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised, Chapter 3, Criteria, as it pertains to recommendations of the Ad Hoc Committee on Development Review, with the following revisions: . OR I move to deny the amendments to the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised, Chapter 3, Criteria, as it pertains to recommendations of the Ad Hoc Committee on Development Review, finding that: . ATTACHMENT: 1. Proposed Amendments 2. Ordinance (0)99-47 . . bieL Pl. WI d Zoning Administrator iAio Co ' Develop ) t Director 6-7(Ari-� Town Manager F:\ZONECODE\ZCR\3\ADHOCCRITERIATC.RPT.doc ATTACHMENT Proposed Amendments Chapter 3: Amend Section 3-302 to read: Sec. 3-302 Criteria In considering any application for development review, the Development Review Board shall be guided by the following criteria, AS WELL AS CHAPTER 16, DESIGN GUIDELINES: A. The Board shall examine the application to insure that all provisions of this ordinance and all other ordinances, master plans, general plans and standards of the Town of Oro Valley shall be complied with where applicable. B. The proposed development shall not have a detrimental effect upon the general health, welfare, safety and convenience of persons residing or working in the neighborhood, nor shall it be detrimental or injurious to the neighborhood. C. CONSIDERING THE ENTITLEMENTS OF THE ZONING FOR THE PROPERTY, the proposed development shall promote a desirable relationship of structures to one another, to open spaces and topography both on the site and in the surrounding neighborhood. D. The height, area, setbacks and overall mass as well as parts of any structure (buildings, walls, signs, lighting, etc.) and landscaping shall be appropriate to the development, the neighborhood and the community. E. Ingress, egress, internal traffic circulation, off-street parking facilities, loading and service areas and pedestrian ways shall be so designed as to promote safety and convenience, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SUBDIVISION STREET STANDARDS, THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED, AND ACCEPTED ENGINEERING DESIGN PRINCIPLES. • • to, those strtictures the neighboring environment and thea'chi ectural character adopted for any given a yea avoiding excessive variety or monotonous repetition. (NOW IN CHAPTER 16, DESIGN GUIDELINES) the building design. (NOW IN CHAPTER 16, DESIGN GUIDELINES) • • . . .} . . . . ' • . (NOW IN CHAPTER 16, DESIGN GUIDELINES) I. All buil .it+Ys .tufcs c iy l ildi s su-J-1- as- w 1ls at}c1 fel-ices � to be compatible \vith the sun-ow-kik-1g desert atm ..ii aii s i t k k ro nd. (NOW IN CHAP ER 16, DESIGN GUIDELINES) earth arid plant tont-s itnd sli,til minimize contrast and gltre. (NOW IN CHAPTER 16, DESIGN i- GUIDELINES) u ✓ order to assure a minimum degree of destruct s vetetat n -anxd contours, phased IP proper assurances lhav:� 1c. n rL�;eived and appro\ed 1).. the Town. (NOW PART OF CHAPTER 15, GRADING ORDINANCE.) ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-47 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, RELATING TO AMENDMENTS TO THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED, CHAPTER 3, CRITERIA; ESTABLISHING THESE AMENDMENTS AS PART OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED, AND FIXING THE EFFECTIVE DATE THEREOF; PRESERVING RIGHTS AND DUTIES THAT HAVE ALREADY BEEN ASSURED AND PROCEEDINGS THAT HAVE ALREADY BEGUN THEREUNDER BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY: SECTION 1. Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised, Chapter 3, amending Section 3-302, Criteria, is hereby amended to read: Sec. 3-302 Criteria In considering any application for development review, the Development Review Board shall be guided by the following criteria, AS WELL AS CHAPTER 16, DESIGN GUIDELINES: A. The Board shall examine the application to insure that all provisions of this ordinance and all other ordinances, master plans, general plans and standards of the Town of Oro Valley shall be complied with where applicable. B. The proposed development shall not have a detrimental effect upon the general health, welfare, safety and convenience of persons residing or working in the neighborhood, nor shall it be detrimental or injurious to the neighborhood. C. CONSIDERING THE ENTITLEMENTS OF THE ZONING FOR THE PROPERTY, the proposed development shall promote a desirable relationship of structures to one another, to open spaces and topography both on the site and in the surrounding neighborhood. D. The height, area, setbacks and overall mass as well as parts of any structure (buildings, walls, signs, lighting, etc.) and landscaping shall be appropriate to the development, the neighborhood and the community. E. Ingress, egress, internal traffic circulation, off-street parking facilities, loading and service areas and pedestrian ways shall be so designed as to promote safety and convenience, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SUBDIVISION STREET STANDARDS, THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED, AND ACCEPTED ENGINEERING DESIGN PRINCIPLES. SECTION 2. All ordinances and part of ordinances in conflict with provisions of this ordinance or any part of the amendments to the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised adopted herein by reference are hereby repealed on the effective date of this ordinance. SECTION 3. Repeal of all ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions set forth herein or any part of the amendments to the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised adopted herein by reference does not affect rights and duties that have matured or penalties that were incurred and proceedings that were begun before the effective date of the repeal. SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of the ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this 1 St day of September, 1999. Mayor Paul H. Loomis ATTEST: Kathryn Cuvelier,Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Dan L. Dudley, Town Attorney F:\ZONECODE\ZCR\9\ADHOC3.ORD.doc 14 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: September 1, 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL FROM: Dennis Silva, Jr., Planner I SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE (0)99-48 , OV12-94-32 SUNRIDGE II RECREATION AREA IN-LIEU FEE PROPOSAL LOCATED 3/4 MILE EAST OF LA CANADA DRIVE AND 1 MILE NORTH OF TANGERINE ROAD BACKGROUND: SunRidge, originally 80 acres in size, was rezoned by Mayor and Council from R1-144 to R1-20 (104 lots with minimum lot size 20,000 square feet) in the summer of 1994. The subject property is located approximately 1244 feet south of Moore Road, west of Rancho Vistoso, Neighborhood 7, and north of the Coyote Ridge subdivision. William Dallman, the developer of SunRidge II, requests an in-lieu fee for the two recreation areas in this subdivision. This item was continued from the August 4, 1999 Town Council meeting. SUMMARY: Most of the owners of this 65-lot subdivision have agreed to leave the recreation area in its natural state. The petition that was signed by approximately fifty (50) lot owners states, "We, the undersigned owners of SunRidge, would like to preserve our natural desert. We ask that the Town of Oro Valley allow us to keep Common Area and `B' as natural open space with no recreational facilities." Though many of these signatures are owner/developers not residents, Staff has received no objections to this proposal from residents. The developers of SunRidge II propose an in-lieu fee that will go to the parks fund which is equal to the amount that the recreation areas would cost. The proposed in-lieu fee is attached to this report. SunRidge II was granted a variance on May 25, 1999, which based the in-lieu fee on the cost to provide improvements to the lots versus fair market value of the lots as stated in the Zoning Code. This variance was granted because the developers had already set aside the recreation areas, but later determined that it was in their, and the homeowners' best interests not to improve the sites (see the attached letter). Staff suggests that the in-lieu fee be increased to accurately assess these costs. Staff requested a cost estimate from McGann & Associates and TMHS and based on these estimates,the fee should be increased from$1,958, as proposed,to $2,400. GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE: The proposed in-lieu fee proposal complies with Policy 6.2E preserving and enhancing open space areas that protect the visual and natural resources of the community. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 2 12ECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the SunRidge II in-lieu fee proposal with a fee of$2,400. SUGGESTED MOTION: The Council may wish to consider one of the following motions: I move to approve OV 12-94-32 SunRidge II In-Lieu Fee Proposal, attached herewith. OR I move to approve Ordinance (0)99-48 , OV12-94-32 SunRidge II In-Lieu Fee Proposal, attached herewith and the following added conditions: OR I move to deny Ordinance (0)99-4$ , 0V12-94-32 SunRidge II In-Lieu Fee Proposal, finding that: Attachments: 1. Ordinance (0)99-48 '. SunRidge II In-Lieu Fee Proposal 1/1/ /at Pl. 11917: d Zoning Administrator 77}LaA.,;...4 Community Development Director / (Attar— own Manager F:\ov\ov12\1994\12-94-32\INLIEUFEERPT2.doc ORDINANCE (0)99- 48 AN ORDINANCE REQUIRING AN IN-LIEU FEE FOR SUNRIDGE II LOCATED 3/h MILE EAST OF LA CANADA DRIVE AND 1/2 MILE NORTH OF TANGERINE ROAD WHEREAS, the developer for SunRidge II proposed an in-lieu fee for the recreation area; and WHEREAS, the Oro Valley Town Council has considered the requested Planned Area Development amendment at a Public Hearing and finds that it to be consistent with the Town's General Plan and Ordinances, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY: SECTION 1. The in-lieu fee for the recreation area for the SunRidge II subdivision shall be $2,400. This fee shall be paid prior to any further release of lots. Landscaping proposed for the recreation area will be installed and irrigated per the approve plans prior to any release of lots required to assure the recreation areas. SECTION 2. That all ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be and the same are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict; SECTION 3. That all ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be and the same are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict; SECTION 4. That this ordinance and the various parts thereof are hereby declared to be severable. If any section, sub-section, sentence, clause, word or phrase of this ordinance is, for any reason, held to be unconstitutional, such holdings shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance. ORDINANCE (0)9948 (Continued) PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this 1st day of September, 1999. Paul H. Loomis,Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Dan L. Dudley, Town Attorney F:\ov\ovi2\1994\12-94-32\ORDTNANCE.doc I CHINA_ • -1 CUSTOM HOMES, INC.s _ s July 20, 1999 Estimated cost for Sunridge recreation areas 1. 60 x 40 sand volley ball court with 2 post and net 833.00 2. 3 picnic tables Iron Mountain Forge #415-GXT 1,005.00 3. 2- 15 gal. mesquite trees (60.00) 4. 470 LF 24" decomposed granite path (6 yds granite) 120.00 5. All tractor work and miscellaneous labor to be provided by Kachina Custom Homes at no cost to Sunridge owners. Total Cost $1,958.00 Note: Trees have already been planted in small recreation area. l Michael E. Arnold President Kachina Custom Homes Inc. General Contractor License#074902 • 180 West Linda Vista Drive • Tucson,AZ 85737 • Telephone: (520)797-2137 • FAX(520)797-2137 t • ` o • R Pc..7 u e.v�� C �. ,rte -17 c:14 - e , r e c,r ems. dcz. , • e-- -77c11rc \.\ e-7 c.c "7"C\ r r\ d a r s e r �c4 : = Qtz CO3-; \ e ""k"1 �.- cam., �� \ ` `' e `�. o p e_ `�-�.c-= : b u . .z.�cS. aQ. S\ v-\ -L G�t,�-- �5*r `_' C' ate. —�-c• y \ ck-r Com\ -c: S '-'-c� p ^a cL_C' Qc‹.Fb. -6-70 d1 e ,O -Ccz cr_ � rrN Q. 0 (:) _ C t \• 1-(2c) 62.0 r' � o teS \ o `cef'S cf: c). r p cx-S 0— e_, o-P r cLrer....c r . . CtaiN C.)Q (# / 11 cD r , L--%G r.<3 L-3 '4' Lk3 ‘)I\ Fs 0 _-47 k.„ c- C: �'`� --_c 0 t-.s r - • . Ca.,.. C d \.) -....._\ ... \ ."- - -.k' -- --....__. X. _ ._ ____. ____... • _____......._ --k-CN.ct..._ �c� boy -;---op{-a �` GS c- • tC.-& f_.. --'---k 4;(- --.. \ =,C. --k-AN .Cc..)--‘, f. C .0 w<-- .,\ ' . r rC..5- c:.. -••=r\-t-• L.,,... .tx_.--%. \ G.:R._,,-\4 ,..,... a,...:‘ Ic...k (t a � _ --- - -- -- -- -.- ........_•..... 7 - --- .c.!:.-r- _. _ - .... (...."\e. ..A.-‘... ,....-.1 , U..-.j -4.- C.... C--2.- G)l.) C..—, C.-' p7 G) -- , - --....._. _ . _ __ ..,z....\. __ _ r` L--.._ _ .. .__ '`N. -- - -__.u_0 V __cam, _*_" ,! .__p�i- "-`�''- - --- TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 15 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: September 1, 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Dennis Silva, Jr., Planner I SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE (0)99- , OV9-99-112 REQUEST TO AMEND THE RANCHO VISTOSO PAD, REQUIRING SIDEWALKS ON BOTH SIDES OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD FOR ALL FUTURE DEVELOPMENT ADDENDUM REPORT SUMMARY: The Department of Public Works reviewed this request and needed more clarification on the costs and feasibility of the PAD amendment. Issues such as the amount of sidewalk that the developer will be responsible for versus the Town's amount still need to be resolved in order to calculate an accurate cost. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends continuance of the proposed Rancho Vistoso PAD Amendment requiring sidewalks on both sides of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard to the next regularly scheduled Town Council meeting. b.CL. PlannilW d Zoning Administrator Corn nity Development Director /;...cA. 4414 _I own Manager F:\OV\OV9\1999\9-99-112\PADAMDTCRPT2.doc TOWN OF ORO VALLEY .15 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: September 1, 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Dennis Silva, Jr., Planner I SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE (0)99-49 , OV9-99-112 REQUEST TO AMEND THE RANCHO VISTOSO PAD, REQUIRING SIDEWALKS ON BOTH SIDES OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD FOR ALL FUTURE DEVELOPMENT BACKGROUND: The current Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development was adopted by the Mayor and Council in 1987. The PAD encompasses 7,626 acres and is bounded on the south by Tangerine Road,on the east by Oracle Road, and on the north by the Tortolita Mountains. When fully developed, the PAD will have a variety of residential types, commercial, technical, and public areas. NATURE OF REQUEST: Staff has received a request from a concerned Oro Valley citizen to amend the Rancho Vistoso PAD to require sidewalks on both sides of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard for all new developments. Presently, the Rancho Vistoso PAD requires sidewalks only to be constructed on the north and west sides of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard. GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE: Staff has evaluated the request for the amendment to the Rancho Vistoso PAD against the General Plan Policies. Circulation/Transportation Element: Policy 2.1D of the General Plan ensures the safe, convenient and efficient non- motorized traffic circulation through building sidewalks, and providing other specific provisions for safe use of arterials by pedestrians. The proposed PAD amendment complies with this policy of the General Plan by encouraging the development of more sidewalks in the Town. PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: Vistoso Partners, LLC and the Vistoso Community Association support the proposed PAD amendment for providing sidewalks along both sides of streets within the PAD. The Rancho Vistoso PAD states that a primary bicycle-pedestrian path system linking neighborhoods and community amenities shall be provided in conjunction with major streets and routes, and secondary paths shall link planning units with the primary system. Staff recommends adding a condition that sidewalks would be required on both sides of all collectors for future development, not just Rancho Vistoso Boulevard. This proposal is not beyond the scope of the request and ensures compliance with the Rancho Vistoso PAD and the General Plan. The current Subdivision Street Standards for the Town requires sidewalks to be implemented along both sides of paved streets with curbs,or along streets where future curb grades and locations are established. The proposed PAD amendment will comply with this Town requirement. Currently, there are about seven (7)miles of developed sidewalks and about six(6) miles of undeveloped sidewalks along Rancho Vistoso Boulevard. About half of the undeveloped sidewalks occur along developed areas. It will cost the Town about$120,000 to install sidewalks along these areas of Rancho Vistoso. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 2 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the proposed Rancho Vistoso PAD Amendment requiring sidewalks on both sides of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard with the condition stated in the Planning and Zoning Commission recommendation. PLANNING AND ZONING COMNIISSION ACTION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this PAD Amendment by a 4—0 vote on August 3, 1999 with a condition requiring sidewalks on both sides of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard (5 foot width) and all collector streets (4 foot width)for future development and the sidewalk may meander to match the existing sidewalks. SUGGESTED MOTION: The Council may wish to consider one of the following motions: I move to approve Ordinance(0)99-49 , OV9-99-112 Rancho Vistoso PAD Amendment, attached herewith. OR I move to approve Ordinance (0)99-49 , OV9-99-112 Rancho Vistoso PAD Amendment herewith and the following added conditions: OR i move to deny Ordinance(0)99- 49,OV9-99-112 Rancho Vistoso PAD Amendment, finding that: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ordinance(0)99-49 2. PAD Amendment Proposal cud,/it.)1.... PlanninIrre Zoning Adli istrator I a) jo.`,. i�Co i ity Develop I -'t Director A, id i ' 4 • Town Manager I F:\OV\OV9\1999\9-99-112\PADAMDTCRPT.doc ORDINANCE (0)99-4 9 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE RANCHO VISTOSO PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT REQUIRING SIDEWALKS ON BOTH SIDES OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD WHEREAS, Vistoso Partners, LLC the master developer of this PAD, have requested an amendment to require sidewalks on both sides of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has considered said application for amendment to the Planned Area Development, at a duly noticed Public Hearing, in accordance with State Statutes, and has made its recommendations to the Town Council; and WHEREAS, the Oro Valley Town Council has considered the requested Planned Area Development amendment at a Public Hearing and finds that it to be consistent with the Town's General Plan and Ordinances, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY: SECTION 1. The Planned Area Development Document may be amended requiring sidewalks on both sides of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard at a five (5) foot width and all collector streets at a four (4) foot width for future development and the sidewalk may meander to match the existing sidewalks. SECTION 2. That all ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be and the same are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict; ORDINANCE (0)99- 49(Continued) PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this 1st day of September, 1999. Paul H. Loomis, Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Dan L. Dudley,Town Attorney F:\OV\OV9\1999\9-99-112\ORDINANCE.doc .LI7Li JCL' MAY 1 : 19 Richard Izen 12356 North Mount Bigelow Road Oro Valley, AZ 85737 May 17, 1999 Mr. Bryant Nodine, Planning and Zoning Administrator Oro Valley Town Hall 11000 North La Canada Drive Oro Valley, AZ 85737 Dear Mr. Nodine, I would like to request that the town consider amending the Rancho Vistoso PAD to require that all future development along the East and South sides of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard include the provision of sidewalks in the Town Right of Way along those sides of the Boulevard. As you know, the current PAD calls for sidewalks only on the West and North sides of the Boulevard. Because of this limit in the PAD requirements three developers (Monterey Homes, Pulte Homes, and Canada Vista Homes) have refused to install these sidewalks despite requests by residents and the Vistoso Community Association. Reasons for the additional sidewalks include the safety and convenience of residents on the East side of the Boulevard who are currently forced to cross the street through the increasing traffic to reach a pedestrian walkway. Further it is my belief that the town will eventually desire these sidewalks along major roads such as Rancho Vistoso Boulevard. If the PAD is changed, the developers would be required to fund these walkways as they develop adjacent areas. If there is no PAD change, the walkways along the entire length of the boulevard will eventually require town funding. This change will mean that while the town will eventually have to fund sidewalks along the already developed areas, the town will save the costs of the sidewalk along areas which have not yet been developed. It is my understanding that Vistoso Partners LLC, the current PAD owner, has given assurances that they would support such a PAD amendment so long as it is not retroactive and so long as they would not have to bear any costs in conjunction with the amendment (fees, surveys, drawings, etc.). This will have to be confirmed with them but I believe my understanding correctly represents their position. You have already received a letter from Mark Lewis indicating that while LMR and Vistoso Community Association have no legal standing, they would support the proposed amendment and act as facilitators. Bryant, there is some urgency to this for two reasons. Currently the PAD owner is favorable to a prospective amendment. As land sales are made, this could change. Secondly, each time a land sale is made under the current PAD rules the portion that is not covered by a prospective amendment (and that the town might well have to fund) increases. If there is anything I can to assist in this please don't hesitate to call me. Sincere 401P:e_.;/ Richard lzen c: Mark Lewis Dick Maes 1 6 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: September 1, 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Dennis Silva, Jr., Planner I SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE (0)995° , OV9-99-113 REQUEST TO AMEND THE RANCHO VISTOSO PAD, TO ADD THE DATE PALM TO THE APPROVED PLANT MATERIALS LIST BACKGROUND: The current Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development was adopted by the Mayor and Council in 1987. The PAD encompasses 7,626 acres and is bounded on the south by Tangerine Road, on the east by Oracle Road, and on the north by the Tortolita Mountains. When fully developed, the PAD will have a variety of residential types, commercial,technical, and public areas. NATURE OF REQUEST: The WLB Group, representing the developer, Vistoso Partners, LLC request to amend the Rancho Vistoso PAD to add the Phoenix dactylifera— Date Palm to the Approved Plant Materials List. The Date Palm is already used in the El Conquistador Resort, thus, the applicant believes this request is reasonable. If approved, the applicant plans I use the Date Palm for the resort sites in the Rancho Vistoso PAD. GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE: Staff has evaluated the request for the amendment to the Rancho Vistoso PAD against the General Plan Policies. Natural Resource Conservation: Policy 8.1G of the General Plan states that Indigenous (native desert) vegetation should be maintained and enhanced where possible. The Date Palm is not indigenous to the Sonoran desert environment. Policy 8.10 encourages restricting the use of non-native plant materials in new developments. The applicant plans to use the Date Palm for new resort developments in Rancho Vistoso. Policy 8.1U encourages the use of low water, native plants in golf courses, resorts, developments, parks, etc. The applicant's request is in non- compliance with the above-referenced General Plan policies. PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: Staff has reviewed the proposed PAD Amendment, and the planning considerations are as follows: Addendum C, to the Oro Valley Prohibited Plant List in Article 14-2 of the OVZCR, states that any species of tree or shrub whose mature height may be expected to exceed 25 feet, with the exception of those indigenous plants, listed in Addendum A, Oro Valley Approved Plant List, is prohibited. While the Date Palm is listed in the Arizona Department of Water Resources' low-water-use plant list, it meets the Town's criteria for a prohibited plant it is expected to exceed 25 feet and it is not listed in the Oro Valley Approved Plant List. although the El Conquistador Resort permits the use of Date Palms, it was approved prior to the passage of the Oro Valley Prohibited Plant List. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 2 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ACTION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the request by a 4 — 0 vote on August 3, 1999 with the following locational requirements: (1) date palms shall be located either in a plaza/courtyard setting or no more than two times their height at maturity from a building; (2) at maturity, the trees shall be no taller than the height of the adjacent buildings; and(3)they shall not be used for perimeter landscaping. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of the Rancho Vistoso PAD amendment to add the Phoenix dactylifera—Date Palm to the Approved Plant Materials List. This request does not comply with the General Plan and the OVZCR. SUGGESTED MOTION: The Council may wish to consider one of the following motions: I move to approve Ordinance (0)99- 50 , OV9-99-113 Rancho Vistoso PAD Amendment, attached herewith. OR T move to approve Ordinance (0)99- , OV9-99-113 Rancho Vistoso PAD Amendment herewith and the .,onditions recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the following added conditions: OR I move to deny Ordinance (0)99-50 , OV9-99-113 Rancho Vistoso PAD Amendment, finding that: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ordinance (0)99- 50 2. PAD Amendment Proposal • Plann"2 d Zoning A dministrator L .A_ Co •i unity Develo a r ent Director Town Manag- F:\OV\OV9\1999\9-99-113\PADAMDTCRPT.doc ORDINANCE (0)99- 50 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE RANCHO VISTOSO PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT ADDING THE DATE PALM TO THE APPROVED PLANT MATERIALS LIST WHEREAS, Vistoso Partners, LLC the master developer of this PAD, have requested an amendment to add the Phoenix dactylifera—Date Palm to the Approved Plant Materials List; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has considered said application for amendment to the Planned Area Development, at a duly noticed Public Hearing, in accordance with State Statutes, and has made its recommendations to the Town Council; and WHEREAS, the Oro Valley Town Council has considered the requested Planned Area Development amendment at a Public Hearing and finds that it to be consistent with the Town's General Plan and Ordinances, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY: SECTION 1. The Planned Area Development Document may be amended adding the Phoenix Dactylifera—Date Palm—to be used in resort sites with the following locational requirements: a) Date palms shall be located either in a plaza/courtyard setting or no more than two times their height,at maturity, from a building. b) At maturity,the trees shall be no taller than the height of the adjacent buildings. c) They shall not be used for perimeter landscaping. SECTION 2. That all ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be and the same are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict; SECTION 3. That all ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be and the same are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict; SECTION 4. That this ordinance and the various parts thereof are hereby declared to be severable. If any section, sub-section, sentence, clause, word or phrase of this ordinance is, for any reason, held to be unconstitutional, such holdings shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance. ORDINANCE (0)99-50 (Continued) PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this 1st day of September, 1999. Paul H. Loomis, Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Dan L. Dudley, Town Attorney e Engineering • Planning B Surveying • Urban Design Landscape Architecture roup Inc. May 28, 1999 Mr. Bryant Nodine Town of Oro Valley 11000 North La Canada Drive Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 Subject: Request for Amendment of PAD Rancho Vistoso Development Standards Dear Bryant: We would like to amend the Rancho Vistoso Development Standards,Appendix B,Approved Plant Materials, Page B-1 dated April 22, 1987,with the addition of Phoenix dactylifera—Date Palm. If you have any questions, please call me at 881-7480. Thank you. Sincerely, TH WLB GROUP, NC. Gary L. Grizzle Manager of Landscape Architecture GLG:hg W:W E1 DI11850501Letterslnodine.pad2.wpd Engineering • Planning • Surveying • Urban Design • Landscape Architecture Offices located in Tucson, Phoenix, Las Vegas • E-mail: wlbtuc@ix.netcom.com 4444 East Broadway • Tucson, Arizona 85711 • (520) 881-7480 • FAX (520) 881-7492 17' TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: September 1St , 1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: David Marsh, Planner I SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING : ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-51- , AMENDMENTS TO THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED, CHAPTERS TWO, DEFINITIONS, AND NINE, LOCATIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR CONVENIENCE USES BACKGROUND: Staff has prepared a zoning code amendment which will permit the location of convenience uses in shopping centers and office parks of 9 acres in size or larger. Currently, convenience uses are only permitted by the OVZCR to be located in shopping centers of 10 acres in size or larger. The OVZCR defines `shopping centers' as "a group of stores planned and designed for the site on which it is built, functioning as a unit, with off-street parking, landscaped areas and pedestrian malls or plazas provided on the property as an integral part of the unit". Because stores are defined as being `retail' in nature, this would exclude office parks as a `shopping center', and hence prohibit the location of a convenience use in an office park. SUMMARY: he Planning Center, representing the owner of the land at the northwest corner of Linda Vista and Oracle Road, has requested a code amendment to allow for the location of convenience use within an office park. The letter requesting this code amendment, and their rationale, is attached herewith. Staff has also examined the minimum size requirements of commercial centers to permit convenience uses. Currently, the OVZCR requires a minimum commercial center size of 10 acres for convenience uses to be permitted; however, a 10 acre commercial site may be reduced to approximately 9 to 9.5 acres after dedication of land for road, drainage, and utility dedications. In recognition of this, Staff has proposed that the minimum size requirement of commercial developments to permit convenience uses be lowered to 9 acres, and the corresponding total number of convenience uses be lowered from 1 pad per 5 acres to 1 pad per 4.5 acres. At the direction of the Planning & Zoning Commission, Staff has placed a restriction limiting the number of drive-through and retail motor fuel convenience uses to one per nine acres of office park. This condition was based on the Commission's concern over traffic impacts associated with drive-through uses, such as fast food restaurants, and retail motor fuel establishments. The attached code amendments to Chapters Two and Nine would allow for convenience uses to locate in office parks of 9 acres in size or larger. Moreover, it will allow for convenience uses to be located in mixed-use developments, both commercial and office in nature. Convenience uses would be subject to timing of development restrictions, such that they cannot be constructed until 50% of the total floor area of the non- convenience use structures in the office park or shopping center have been built. In addition, convenience uses in -ffice parks would only be permitted in commercial zoning designations. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 2 PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION ACTION: At its August 4th 1999 meeting, the Planning & Zoning Commission voted 4-0 to recommend approval of this item, with the condition that the number of drive-thru and retail motor fuel convenience uses be limited to one per nine acres. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends Town Council approval for amendments to Chapters 2 and 9 of the OVZCR, relating to the Locational Requirements for Convenience Uses, as shown in the attached Ordinance. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to approve Ordinance No. (0)99-51 , Amendments to the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised, Chapter 2, Definitions, and Chapter 9, Locational Requirements for Convenience Uses. OR I move to approve Ordinance No. (0)99-51 , Amendments to the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised, Chapter 2, Definitions, and Chapter 9, Locational Requirements for Convenience Uses, with the following revisions: . OR I move to deny Ordinance No. (0)99- 51 , Amendments to the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised, Chapter 2, Definitions, and Chapter 9, Locational Requirements for Convenience Uses, finding that: . ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ordinance No. (0)99- 51 . 2. Letter of Request from the Planning Center. ikr i / i • Plann :;: .' d Zoning Administrator-All j9_,,.. oICo nity Developm: t Director r I anager ':\ZONECODE\ZCR\9\9-110\Conv Use Amend TC.rpt.doc ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-51 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, RELATING TO AMENDMENTS OF THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED, CHAPTER 2, DEFINITIONS AND CHAPTER 9, CONDITIONAL USE REGULATIONS, LOCATIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR CONVENIENCE USES; ESTABLISHING THESE AMENDMENTS AS PART OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY: SECTION 1. Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised, Chapter 2, Definitions, and Chapter 9, Conditional Use Regulations, Locational Requirements for Convenience Uses, is hereby amended to read: CHAPTER 2 DEFINITIONS ARTICLE 2-1. DEFINITIONS Section 2-101 General SHOPPING CENTER shall mean a group of stores planned and designed for the site on which it is built, functioning as a unit, with off-street parking, landscaped areas and pedestrian malls or plazas provided on the property as an integral part of a unit. The unit shall have common points of ingress and egress and occupy a land area no less than-18- 9 acres, whether on single or multiple lots or under single or multiple ownership. All structures within a shopping center shall be architecturally integrated with regard to construction materials and colors. OFFICE shall mean a building or part thereof, designed, intended or used for the practice of a profession, the carrying on of a business, the conduct of public administration, or , where not conducted on the site thereof, the administration of an industry, but shall not include a retail commercial use, any industrial use, financial institution, place of amusement,or place of assembly. OFFICE PARK shall mean a group of offices planned and designed for the site on which it is built, functioning as a unit, with off-street parking and landscaping provided on the property as an integral part of the unit. The unit shall have common points of ingress and egress and occupy a land area no less than 9 acres, whether on single or multiple lots or under single or multiple ownership. All structures within the office park shall be architecturally integrated with regard to construction materials, colors, and architectural style. CHAPTER 9 CONDITIONAL USE REGULATIONS ARTICLE 9-1. CONDITIONS FOR SPECIFIC USES Section 9-110 Convenience Uses A. Location: 5. Locational Requirements: a. Convenience uses shall be ancillary to and located in shopping centers , office parks, and a combination of a shopping center and office park as a mixed use development. b. Total convenience use floor area shall not exceed 10% of the maximum allowable floor area ratio of the zoning district in which a shopping center or office park is located and the total number of convenience uses shall not exceed 1 pad per 4.5 acres of shopping center or office park. No more than one drive-thru or retail motor fuel / automotive service station convenience use shall be permitted for every nine acres of an office park. c. All convenience uses shall be accessed through a common driveway serving the center or office park(see Illustration B). SECTION 2. All ordinances and part of ordinances in conflict with provisions of this ordinance or any part of the amendments to the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised adopted herein by reference are hereby repealed on the effective date of this ordinance. SECTION 3. Repeal of all ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions set forth herein or any part of the amendments to the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised adopted herein by reference does not affect rights and duties that have matured or penalties that were incurred and proceedings that were begun before the effective date of the repeal. SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of the ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this 1St day of September, 1999. Paul H. Loomis, Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Dan L. Dudley, Town Attorney F:\ZONECODE\ZCR\9\9-110\Conv Use Amend.ORD.doc � J o� JUN-Z1-1'i`�`� 11; 11 IHt VLHNNINU LtNItK � � 17�71'� r.U 'u (.1. THE ePLANNING t) CENTER Governmental Services Planning & Urban Design Environmental Studies June 21, 1999 Landscape Architecture Dennis Douglas, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission 110 S.Church,Suite 1260 Town of Oro Valley Tucson, AZ 85701 11000 North La Canada Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 Phone:520.623.6146 Far:520.622.1950 Subject: Proposed Zoning Code Revision to Section 9-110A5a, Locational Requirement for Convenience Uses Emait.planning@4ca-net.com Dear Mr. Douglas, The Planning Center represents the property owners of a 14 acre site located at the northwest corner of Linda Vista Boulevard and Oracle Road. We are seeking a rezoning of that property from R1-144 Single Family Residential to C-N Neighborhood Commercial District to permit development of an office park. The only non-office use within this development will be a gasoline sales/convenience mart located on the northwest corner of Linda Vista Boulevard and Oracle Road and a "sit down" restaurant at the southwest corner of Desert Sky Road and Oracle Road. A pre-submittal meeting was held with planning staff on June 18 to discuss the proposed rezoning where it was discussed that convenience uses such as the proposed gasoline sales use are limited by Section 9-110A5a to"shopping centers". Centers where the predominant use is "office" exclude the development of"convenience" uses. Planning staff felt that due to the fact that the C-N Neighborhood Commercial District, as well as the other commercial districts, permit retail, office and convenience uses within them, and the fact that development of centers with a mix of uses such as these is typically preferred in order to provide a useful mix of uses to the neighborhood, that a code amendment might be in order. Therefore, The Planning Center formally requests the Planning and Zoning Commission initiate a Zoning Code Amendment to Section 9-11 OA5a to state "Convenience uses shall be ancillary to and located in shopping centers and office centers." The Planning and Zoning Commission may also wish to strengthen this amendment with the inclusion of a new definition for"office center". The Planning and Zoning Commission's careful review and consideration of this proposal is appreciated. Sincerely, 1/45140.46amraimaim... Steve Nage The Planning Center • TOTAL P.02 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 18 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: September 1, p1999 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL FROM: Chuck Sweet, Town Manager SUBJECT: Appointment of Becky Blankenship to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board BACKGROUND: The Oro Valley Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, a seven-member advisorybodyto the Town Council, currently has one opening. Mr. John Russell, former member of the Board, resigned earlier thisy ear for health reasons. SUMMARY: In late June 1999, interviews were conducted with Oro Valley residents who expressed a desire to serve on the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board. Interviews were conducted by Ms. Karen Baker, Chair of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, Chuck Sweet, Town Manager, and due to a change in liaison responsibilities, some interviews were attended by Council Member LaSala and Council Member Bryant respectively. RECOMMENDATION: Upon review of candidates, the interview panel recommends that the Town Council appoint Ms. Becky Blankenship to membership on the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, with a term to expire in May 2001. SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to APPOINT Ms. Becky Blankenship to the Oro Valley Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, with a term to expire in May 2001. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Application from Ms. Becky Blankenship / 9 _ Ji / 4 Town Manage Pr F:INDIVID\LMT\TCC\pbbbappt.tcc U>:Agnit) ::. `' Mme ' dirViCji "'TTT�i�777 • ORO VALLEY BOARD/C0 SION APPLICATION Dear Oro Valley Citizen: alerecur your interest in the Town of Oro Valley. Enclosed is an informational form which aPP when completed will allow us to quickly process your application. While the information asked for is optional, your supplying the information will greatly assist in P aneducation, experience and background to allow the best possible use of your talents which you are so kindlywilling to provide to the Town of Oro Valley and for which we thank you. Please return to the Town Clerk's Office, 11,000 N. La Canada Drive, Oro Valley, Arizona 85737-7015. Name s " ►` • , �- h Last First Middle Home Address Business Adds some Phone Business Phone 11 Number of Years in Oro Valley ' 4- SCI Sign. Date Please state which board/commission you wish to join and why. r k 5 • . • 0 •• • -- WO 4) "i �l�lok iecL t • • " • '•s.. • p +c___M__t____?)CI" ; . •• k _ T . . . G, • Please list other community, civic, professional, social, educational, cultural or athletic P organizati ons Y ou have been affiliated with,length of time,any office held, and any achievements in those organizations you feel are noteworthy. 1 rn6 _S.? r o ilt(; <�-�- p(csdenT na QL&rtc r ra (\ - - 6 ,ceu.rs 0 What do you consider your highest responsibility, skill or achievement; professionally and/or personally, and why. _ c-Q h y— Jr � J i� -4 110- iL D.ti. • A r•-• _ • , - c_ _ . • a • -= eLi le CLc4M1 EMPLOYMENT Please list previous employment List your past or present employment first: Dates of Employment Company Name & Address - • I - - .. • '- l GG ._ - 2. ,seiC.: e s.• - • n As a /9 919 , _5, . ._5o hoz,/ • / d Si (List Position & Job Description in numbered order as listed above) J. • • • " • _ c i rrein 0 CI cc(‘c±c„, -;12___- __Ly") 11.1 (-10,11241:4n EDUCATION Briefly describe your educational background: Institution/School Degree Received t‘4-Lf 3 S ea hP1 / E d e.c.r-e_a.4 tr%► Ex's ► - `t- r -C o-t' h�('c Lo�l G. Thb /� l.'�S e ti's e 5 6 et:,,rl c rc-1 2. 4. Area of Study in numbered order as listed above: _ju_e)&6-pl Q - �a mac'e n 4JL/4k 7 PC4 r-'y._#- / III g- er z rd Arc/ C u c# >*- .111, Other fields of study, professional institutes, training program, etc: IF DESIRED. FURTHER INFORMATION MAY BE ATTACHED 3 DocAPProitM.IC,eIx196