HomeMy WebLinkAboutOV99953 .
MINUTES
ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
TUESDAY,APRIL 6, 1999
TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS
11,000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE
CALL TO ORDER: at 6:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
PRESENT:
Chair Douglas-tardy
Acting Chair, Vice Chair Wiant
Commissioner Partridge
Commissioner Briggs
Commissioner McCook
Commissioner Moody
EXCUSED:
Commissioner Ruble
ALSO PRESENT:
Mayor Loomis
Council Member LaSala
Town Attorney Dan L. Dudley
Prosecuting Attorney Tobin Sidles
ANNOUNCEMENT: Acting Chair Wiant stated that the Commission was expecting Chair Douglas to
arrive at any time.
Acting Chair Wiant asked that the record show that a quorum was present.
MINUTES:
MOTION: Moved/Seconded (Briggs/Moody) and carried by a 5-0 vote to approve the February
18, 1999 Special Meeting, as written.
MOTION: Moved/Seconded (Briggs/McCook) and carried by a 5-0 vote to approve the March 2,
1999 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting minutes,with the following correction: Excused
was Commissioner Moody and Present was Commissioner McCook.
1. PUBLIC HEARING: OV9-98-17, WONG PROPERTY REZONING FROM R1-144 TO R1-36
AND R1-20, LOCATED SOUTH OF NARANJA DRIVE AND APPROXIMATELY 1 %2 MILES
EAST OF LA CANADA DRIVE
APRIL 6, 1999 MINUTES,P&Z COMMISSION MEETING 2
Mr. Nodine, AICP stated that the applicant has requested to postpone this item until the May 6th, 1999
Planning and Zoning Commission meeting.
2. PUBLIC HEARING: OV8-99-03, CHURCH OF THE APOSTLES PAROCHIAL SCHOOL
REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP)
Mr. Nodine, AICP explained that The Church of the Apostles is requesting a conditional use permit to
establish a parochial school, located in the recently annexed area known as La Cholla/Tangerine, which is
currently undeveloped. The parochial school segment will be located on the eastern side and the church
and related offices will be located on the western side of the property. He added that the proposed
parochial school will serve students from pre-school through 8th grade with approximately 220 students
and 15 faculty and staff. The development will comply with all requirements of the County and State
Health Department.
Mr. Nodine, AICP reported that the subject property is bounded on the west, south, and east by Oro
Valley R1-144 zoning, and to the north by Pima County SR. The site is located on the northwest corner
of La Cholla Boulevard and Tangerine Road, and is 35.8 acres.
Mr. Nodine, AICP expressed to the Commissioners that there are determining factors to be considered
before granting the conditional use permits. In terms of the first factor, nuisance arising from noise will
be mitigated by designing the church and school in the center of the parcel, leaving the periphery in its
natural desert state. This natural desert vegetation at the edges will screen this development from the
street and adjacent properties. Illumination will be mitigated by implementing conditions 3 and 4 in
Exhibit "A". The second factor is not relevant to this application. Regarding the third factor, as noted
above, traffic volume and character will change as a result from the proposed uses. However, a traffic
analysis will be done for the development plan phase of this project which will address potential traffic
problems commonly associated with churches and schools. All required parking will be located within
the property boundaries. The proposed school is a day school with students being dropped off and picked
up in the early part of the morning and afternoon. Similar to the peak use of the church on Sundays, the
school will have two peaks of automobile traffic impact to the surrounding area. There is an adjacent
parcel to the north,but the house is more than 600 feet away from the proposed parochial school. Due to
the possibility for major traffic impacts in this area because of the school, staff will require a preliminary
traffic study to be done that addresses impacts to the surrounding area.
Mr. Nodine, AICP summarized that there are requirements in Chapter 9, Conditions for Specific Uses and
Pima County Zoning Code CUP regulations which apply to the proposed parochial school. Per Section 9-
1147G.7 of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised, all recreational facilities and related apparatus shall be
a minimum of 100 feet from all property lines. Per Section 9-114H.2 of the OVZCR, guest parking,
mechanical structures and appurtenances, storage and refuse areas shall be screened according to the
requirements of Section 14-206 as approved by the Development Review Board. Pima County Zoning
Code requirements include compliance with Section 18.09.020A, all outdoor lighting used in conjunction
with the school use shall be located and directed to eliminate light trespass on adjacent streets and
residential properties. All outdoor lighting for outdoor recreational areas shall cease no later than 10:00
p.m. The proposed parochial school will comply with all provisions of the Tangerine Raod Corridor
Overlay District. A viewshed analysis of vistas across the site, including any view corridors to the
mountains, shall be prepared. Other Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District provisions that this project
must address relate to vegetation and landscape standards, architecture, and setbacks.
APRIL 6, 1999 MINUTES,P&Z COMMISSION MEETING 3
Mr. Nodine, AICP stated that regarding General Plan compliance, Oro Valley has designated this
area as acceptable for rural low-density residential uses (R-LDR). The Plan denotes "areas of large
lot single family development ...desirable in a rural environment". This is the lowest intensity land
use designation category in the General Plan, with density from 0-0.3 dwelling units per acre, and is
identified as an "area where there is a desire to retain a rural lifestyle or where protection of the
natural environment is necessary".
Mr. Nodine, AICP explained that the General Plan also established an Urban Growth Boundary
(UGB) along the northern edge of the planning area. The site lies immediately north of the UGB, as
shown on the attached map. The General Plan states that:
"...any land north of the [urban growth] line should not receive any increase in density or land use
intensity over what currently exists...the purpose...was to ensure rural character preservation of
the land within the area...it is strongly recommended that the Town Council and other
jurisdictions consider and honor the existing resident's wishes to maintain the rural character of
the area. Additionally, increasing the intensity of development of this area over the next twenty
years will continue the trend toward urban sprawl that the Focus 2020: Oro Valley General Plan
is attempting to limit." The Town Council approved the translational zoning for this property with
the condition that no more than 30% of the 36-acre site may be developed, which meets the intent
of the UGB.
Mr. Nodine, AICP reported that staff has reviewed the request for conditional use permit for
compliance with Article 3-2, Use Permits, Section 9-114, Churches, and the Pima County Zoning
Code. Staff finds this request in compliance with the above-mentioned provisions, the General Plan,
and recommends approval with those conditions stated in Exhibit"A".
EXHIBIT "A", OV8-99-3, CONDITIONS FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPROVAL,
CHURCH OF THE APOSTLES, PAROCHIAL SCHOOL
1. Per Section 9-114G.7 of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised (OVZCR), all recreational
facilities and related apparatus shall be a minimum of 100 feet from all property lines.
2. Per Section 9-114H.2 of the OVZCR, guest parking, mechanical structures and appurtenances,
storage and refuse areas shall be screened according to the requirements of Section 14-206 as
approved by the Development Review Board (DRB).
3. Per Section 18.09.020A, of the Pima County Zoning Code, all outdoor lighting used in
conjunction with the school use shall be located and directed to eliminate light trespass on
adjacent streets and residential properties.
4. All outdoor lighting for outdoor recreational areas shall cease no later than 10:00 p.m.
5. The proposed parochial school shall comply with all provisions of the Tangerine Corridor
Overlay District.
6. A preliminary traffic impact analysis shall be done prior to Town Council approval of the
CUP.
APRIL 6, 1999 MINUTES,P&Z COMMISSION MEETING 4
Vice Chair Wiant expressed that he does not agree with the access from Tangerine Road. He suggested
that for the sake of public safety, the access should be limited to La Cholla. Tangerine Road does not
have acceleration and deceleration lanes.
Mr. Nodine, AICP stated that traffic studies will be conducted and these issues will be addressed when the
development plan stage.
Bob Vint with Bob Vint and Associates Architects, 312 East Sixth Street, Tucson, 85705, explained that
in terms of site speculation the entrance would eventually include another access, Limewood to La
Cholla. He stated that the Fire Department encouraged having two access points to help ease the flow of
traffic from Tangerine. Mr. Vint stated that, as recommended by staff, a traffic engineering report will be
conducted and they may very well recommend pull-out lanes on Tangerine.
Mr. Vint stated that as part of the project, they will be paving Limewood and Como up to the point where
the entrance road begins. He added that the school will be a real asset and service to the community.
Mr. Vint requested that "Parochial School" be changed to "Parochial/Private/Charter School" instead of
using "Parochial School" as a general term. Mr. Vint stated that in any case, the church and the school
would be very closely associated. He pointed out that the church may arrange with an educational
institution to come in and operate the school in terms of operation and faculty.
PUBLIC HEARING OPENED
Barbara Smith, 13600 N. Como Drive, Oro Valley is concerned that the court will not rule in favor of the
Town of Oro Valley and that the church will have be in serious trouble where building is concerned. Her
second concern is that the proposed school is going to be in the flight path of La Cholla Airpark.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED
In answer to Chair Douglas' question, Mr. Nodine, AICP stated that the issue of the La Cholla Airpark
flight path was not addressed. Mr. Nodine, AICP added that it is in the flight path but out the airport
safety zone.
Mr. Moody asked how far from the end of the runway the property is located.
Mr. Nodine, AICP stated that the location is approximately a mile and a half away from the end of the
runway.
Chair Douglas asked Barbara Smith to please use the microphone, so that what she said would go on
record.
Barbara Smith 13600 N. Como Drive, Oro Valley stated that she had flown the flight patterns last
weekend and they were east of La Cholla. But if someone did a turn out and headed west there is the
possibility that they would fly right over the school.
Chair Douglas stated that this is obviously a concern and asked Mr. Nodine, AICP about this issue.
APRIL 6, 1999 MINUTES,P&Z COMMISSION MEETING 5
Mr. Nodine, AICP stated that at this time, he does not have the data to address this issue.
Mr. Moody stated that the government should have established guidelines for this air park
Chair Douglas suggested that he would like to see this item continued on the basis of the safety zone and
flight patterns for the La Cholla AirPark.
MOTION: Moved/Seconded (Moody/Wiant) and carried by a vote of 6-0 to continue OV8-99-03,
Church of the Apostles Request for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to the May 4, 1999 meeting, to
allow staff the opportunity to research the safety zone and flight patterns of the La Cholla Airpark
and the effects this may or may not have on the proposed school.
3. PUBLIC HEARING: OV9-99-50, TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FOR THE STEWART TITLE
& TRUST PROPERTY (AKA CHAPARRAL HEIGHTS), LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF LAMBERT LANE AND LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD (CONTINUED FROM
MARCH 2, 1999 COMMISSION MEETING)
Mr. Nodine, AICP reported that on August 5, 1998, pursuant to Section 9-471B of the Arizona
Revised Statutes, the Town of Oro Valley Mayor and Council annexed the area known as Map 4.
The Town is required to change, or "translate", the zoning on the annexed properties from Pima
County zoning designations to the closest comparable Oro Valley zoning designation. In accordance
with State law, the Town must translate the County zoning by May of 1999. This item was continued
from the March 2nd Commission hearing for a meeting to be held between the property owners and
the neighbors. This meeting was held on the evening of March 24th, 1999.
Mr. Nodine, AICP stated that the property is located on the southwest corner of Lambert Lane and
La Cholla Boulevard, and extends approximately%2 mile to the west and to the south.
Mr. Nodine, AICP explained that there was a pre-annexation agreement negotiated between the
property owner and the Town, which is attached to this report. Per the terms of this Annexation
Development Agreement, the property will be limited to a maximum 150 lots when subdivided, and
the applicant will be required to submit a Native Plant Preservation and Salvage Plan in order to
preserve the significant stands of Ironwood and Saguaro onsite. The annexation agreement also
permits grading at Pima County standards, and the right to construct erosion control improvements to
previously approved plans by the County. All other aspects of development and use for the property
will be subject to Oro Valley development standards.
Mr. Nodine, AICP summarized that this property is not in conformance with the Town's General
Plan land use map. The proposed translated zoning of R1-20 will not be in conformance with the
General Plan land use designations for the property, which are Low Density Residential (0.6 — 1.2
DUA), Rural Low Density Residential (0.0 — 0.3 DUA), and Parks and Open Space. However, the
proposed translated zoning of R1-20 is consistent with the current CR-1 zoning designation under
Pima County.
Mr. Nodine, AICP added that staff recommends approval of the translation of zoning on the Stewart
Title and Trust property, from Pima County CR-i to Oro Valley R 1-20 and all applicable
R
APRIL 6, 1999 MINUTES,P&Z COMMISSION MEETING 6
development standards of the R1-20 zoning district shall apply thereto,with those conditions listed in
the Annexation Development Agreement and Exhibit A, attached herewith.
Exhibit "A", Planning &Zoning Commission Conditions for Approval, OV9-99-50 Stewart Title
Trust Property(aka Chaparral Heights) Translational Zoning from County CR-1 to R1-20.
1. Grading shall be restricted to 50% of the area of the individual lots, to a maximum of 20,000 square
feet, excluding driveways.
Robert Stubbs, represents the applicant, stated that there has been a sewer improvement district in this
area and the property owner has spent over$300,000 for improvements on this property. Mr. Stubbs
referenced the pre-annexation agreement that the Town Council had already approved. He requested that
this agreement be included in the minutes. He summarized that he felt that this area is the ideal location
for this project. He sincerely requests that the Commission consider approving the R 1-20 zoning request
for the 150 units.
PUBLIC HEARING OPENED
Barbara Smith, 13600 N. Como Drive, stated that she objects to The Town of Oro Valley annexing this
property into Oro Valley and would like to go on record as stating that this is going to cause future
problems for the Town of Oro Valley and when the court case is finally decided and they don't rule in Oro
Valley's favor there will be serious repercussions and she wanted to make sure that the Town of Oro
Valley understands that. She wanted to make sure that the Town of Oro Valley understands that. She
summarized that Oro Valley is annexing land that does not belong to Oro Valley and by giving permits to
people and businesses and allowing changes the Town of Oro Valley is inviting disaster.
Linda Snodgrass, 11311 N. Vista Del Sol, resident for 21 years, and does not wish to be annexed into the
Town of Oro Valley. She stated that she does not want high density housing approved in this area.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED
Mr. Nodine, AICP stated that the main issue is that the grading maximum set at 20,000 square feet.
He added that the applicant has requested and staff does support that the grading could be increased
to 60%,with the Planning and Zoning Administrator's approval.
In answer to Chair Douglas'question,Mr. Nodine,AICP explained that through the Pre-
Annexation Development Agreement, Oro Valley Zoning has already taken care of the height
limitations and the recreational area and took care of the concern with the additional runoff inline
drainage issues. He added, in regard to the vegetation issue, that would be a condition that could be
added, it is not a part of the code. It is a policy in the Platting stage but staff felt that it was
appropriate to add it in at this time.
MOTION: Moved/Seconded (Wiant/Moody) and carried by a 6-0 vote to approve OV9-99-50,
translating zoning of the Stewart Title and Trust property,from Pima County CR-1 to Oro Valley R1-
20 and all applicable development standards of the R1-20 zoning district,with those conditions listed
in the Pre-Annexation Development Agreement and Exhibit "A",
.
APRIL 6, 1999 MINUTES,P&Z COMMISSION MEETING 7
1. Grading shall be restricted to 50% of the area of the individual lots,to a maximum of 20,000 square
feet,excluding driveways.
With the additional allowance that additional grading could be increased to 60% with the approval of
the Planning and Zoning Administrator.
AMENDED MOTION:
Amended as approved by those making and seconding the motion and carried by a 6-0 vote to also add
the condition that the lot size be limited to 24,000 square feet.
4. PUBLIC HEARING: OV9-99-51, TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FOR THE HALLAQ
PROPERTY, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LAMBERT LANE AND LA
CHOLLA BOULEVARD
Mr. Nodine, AICP stated that in accordance with State Statutes, the Town should translate Pima County's
zoning designations for the Hallaq properties, to Oro Valley's closest equivalent designations. The
translational designations are:
CB-1 (Commercial) to C-1 (Commercial): 10 acres
TR(Multi-family residential/offices) to R-6 (Multi-family residential/offices): 20 acres
CR-2 (Single-family residential) to R1-10 (Single-family residential): 50 acres
Mr. Nodine, AICP added that this item was noticed as a public hearing, noticing the change from CB-1 to
C-1. Since then staff has looked into case law and the precedence that was set in the annexation rezoning,
and due to the additional information that was received and the problem with the noticing staff is
recommending a continuance for this item.
PUBLIC HEARING OPENED
Bill Adler 10720 N. Eagle Eye, Oro Valley stated that he would like to complain that if not a legal error,
then the Town has made a procedural error in knowingly entering into an agreement which violates the
General Plan, without going through an amendment process to the General Plan. He added that he cannot
conceive why under some conditions, staff is insist upon going through the amendment process and other
conditions are not. He suggested that if an annexation agreement will violate the General Plan, then an
amendment procedure should be required. Mr. Adler also suggested that he would translate this to RS,
which would take into consideration of the people who live in the area.
Chair Douglas thanked Mr. Adler and stated that, as always, his comments are insightful.
Richard Tracy, 10674 N. Sand Canyon Place, Oro Valley, President of the La Privada Homeowner's
Association. Mr. Tracy is representing the homeowners this evening and is relaying their concerns
regarding the zoning. One of the main issues of concern is the diminishing property values, the water
supply-there is a water pressure issue now, the increase of vehicular and pedestrian traffic from these
apartments, and of course the negative impact on the views. There are homeowners that were told that
these views would not be obstructed and that is why they purchased their lots. Another concern is for the
wildlife that traverses through the wash areas that are in close proximity to the La Privada subdivision.
.
APRIL 6, 1999 MINUTES,P&Z COMMISSION MEETING 8
Mr. Tracy stated that he would like to see every house in a certain subdivision should be "noticed", not
just the one's that are within 300 or 600 feet of proposed changes.
Mr. Tracy added that considering the closest apartments are located over a mile away in any direction the
proposed location would not be the best place in Oro Valley to plant an apartment complex.
Barbara Smith, 13600 N. Como Drive, expressed her to objection of the annexation.
Glen Smith, 10361 N. Sand Canyon Place, stated that he is a resident of the La Privada subdivision and
his property does border the property in question. He explained that he does not agree with the proposed
zoning translation of the Hallaq property.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED
Mr. Nodine, AICP stated that it is the request of the applicant to continue this item to another meeting.
MOTION: Moved/Seconded (Moody/Wiant) and carried by a 6-0 to continue OV9-99-51,
Translational Zoning for the Hallaq Property, located at the northeast corner of Lambert Lane and
La Cholla Boulevard.
Discussion: Mr. McCook stated that he would like to see the square footage requirement a little closer to
the Pima County designation.
5. PUBLIC HEARING: OV9-99-52, TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FOR THE FUTURE
ARIZONA INC. PROPERTY, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LAMBERT
LANE AND LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD,WITH CONDITIONS
The Town is required to change, or "translate", the zoning on the annexed property from the SR Pima
County zoning designations to the closest comparable Oro Valley zoning designation, R1-144.
Chair Douglas stated that Item 5 will be included and considered with Item 9, translational zoning.
6. PUBLIC HEARING: OV9-99-110, TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FOR THE WHEELER
PROPERTY, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SHANNON ROAD AND
NARANJA DRIVE
Mr.Nodine,AICP stated that in September, 1998,pursuant to Section 9-471B of the Arizona Revised
Statutes,the Town of Oro Valley Mayor and Council annexed the area known as Map 2. The Town is
required to change, or "translate" the zoning on the annexed properties from Pima County zoning
designations to the closest comparable Oro Valley zoning designation. In accordance with State law,
the Town has adopted an ordinance which requires the translation of County zoning to occur by April
of 1999.
Mr. Nodine, AICP reported that in accordance with State Statutes, the Town should translate Pima
County's CR-1 zoning, which allows single family residential (1.2 DUA), to Oro Valley's closest
equivalent designation. The translational zoning which was noticed was from County CR-1 to Oro
Valley R1-20, Single Family Residential (2.1 DUA). Upon further review, Staff has determined that
the nearest Oro Valley equivalent to CR-1 is R1-36, which both require a minimum 36,000 square
.
•
APRIL 6, 1999 MINUTES,P&Z COMMISSION MEETING 9
foot lot per residence. Moreover, the permitted density under a R1-36 zone(1.2 DUA) is closer to the
CR-1 density than the R1-20 advertised in the notice.
Mr. Nodine, AICP added that a subdivision plat has been approved by the County for this property.
The plat contains eight lots with a minimum lot size of 40,000 square feet, and a condition restricts
grading on the individual lots to the building pads and driveways.
Mr. Nodine, AICP explained that this property is not in conformance with the Town's General Plan
land use map. The land use category for this area is Rural Low Density Residential (0 to 0.3
DU/acre) which does not comply with the proposed translated zoning of R1-20; however, the current
Pima County CR-1 zoning designation existed prior to the property being annexed into the Town.
Mr. Nodine, AICP conveyed that staff recommends approval of the translation of zoning on Parcel
#224-11-0480, the Wheeler property, from Pima County CR-1 to Oro Valley R1-36, and all
applicable development standards of the R1-36 zoning district shall apply thereto, with the condition
listed in Exhibit"A".
EXHIBIT "A", PLANNING& ZONING COMMISSION, CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL,
OV9-99-110 THE WHEELER PROPERTY, PARCEL#224-11-0480
1. This property shall be subject to the conditions of the recently approved plat.
In answer to Commissioner Briggs' question, Mr. Nodine, AICP explained that the recorded plat
restricts the grading to the building pads and the driveway and with an approved plat there will not be
another opportunity to review until the building permits start coming through.
Jackie Wheeler, 11220 N. Shannon, applicant stated that the zoning has been in effect since before
the annexation process. Ms. Wheeler stated that her goal is to keep the grading to a minimum.
PUBLIC HEARING OPENED
Barbara Smith, 13600 N. Como Drive, stated that her objection is not of the development itself,but to
the Town of Oro Valley and Pima County allowing these changes.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED
MOTION: Moved/Seconded (WiantlBriggs) and carried by a 6-0 vote to approve OV9-99-110,
Translational Zoning for the Wheeler Property, located at the northeast corner of Shannon
Road and Naranja Drive.
7. PUBLIC HEARING: OV-9-99-106, TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FOR THE SMITH
PROPERTY, LOCATED EAST OF SHANNON ROAD AND NORTH NARANJA DRIVE
Mr. Nodine, AICP reported that in September, 1998, pursuant to Section 9-471 B of the Arizona
Revised Statutes,the Town of Oro Valley Mayor and Council annexed the area known as Map 2. The
Town is required to change, or "translate" the zoning on the annexed properties from Pima County
APRIL 6, 1999 MINUTES,P&Z COMMISSION MEETING 10
zoning designations to the closest comparable Oro Valley zoning designation. In accordance with
State law, the Town has adopted an ordinance which requires the translation of County zoning to
occur by April of 1999.
Mr. Nodine, AICP added that in accordance with State Statutes, the Town should translate Pima
County's SR zoning, which allows single family residential (0 - 0.3 DUA), to Oro Valley's closest
equivalent designation,R1-144, Single Family Residential(also permits 0-0.3 DUA).
Mr. Nodine, AICP explained that there was not a pre-annexation agreement negotiated between the
property owner and the Town; however, the property owner requested, during the annexation process
that their existing horse rights under Pima County standards be preserved. Staff has met with the
applicant on this issue, and agree with the applicant's request to preserve their existing horse rights,
with the conditions listed in Exhibit "A". Since Staff's initial meeting with the property owner, a
letter has been submitted which requests that the permitted and conditional uses of the County SR
zoning be retained.
Mr.Nodine,AICP expressed to the Commission that this property is in conformance with the Town's
General Plan land use map. The land use category for this area is Rural Low Density Residential (0
to 0.3 DU/acre)which complies with the proposed translated zoning of R1-144.
Mr. Nodine, AICP stated that staff recommends approval of the translation of zoning on Parcel#224-
11-046E, the Smith property, from Pima County SR to Oro Valley R1-144 and all applicable
development standards of the R1-144 zoning district shall apply thereto, with the conditions listed in
Exhibit"A". These conditions are similar to those placed on the Miller property, located immediately
to the north. He added that staff has reviewed the applicant's request for retention of the permitted
and conditional uses of the County SR zoning in terms of conformance with the OVZCR and the
General Plan, and cannot support the request. The permitted and conditional uses of the County SR
zoning include those which are not permitted under R1-144, such as libraries, veterinary hospitals,
and substance abuse treatment facilities. These uses would not be compatible with the rural
residential character of the area, and would not be in conformance with the General Plan's Rural Low
Density(0—0.3 RAC)designation.
EXHIBIT "A", PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION, CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL,
OV9-99-106 THE SMITH PROPERTY, PARCEL#224-11-046E
1. Pima County Standards shall apply to all livestock and horse facilities and activities.
2. Any expansion of the existing livestock and horse facilities shall be in conformance with the
requirements of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised. Specifically, any additional clearing or
grading (including the expansion of livestock areas) of more than 1000 square feet shall require a
Type I grading permit.
Claud Smith, 11598 N. Shannon Road, applicant, stated that he would like to retain livestock privileges
for his property.
PUBLIC HEARING OPENED
APRIL 6, 1999 MINUTES,P&Z COMMISSION MEETING 11
Barbara Smith, 13600 N. Como Drive, stated that she is opposed to the Town of Oro Valley's
translational zoning of this property because of the pending litigation over the annexation of this land into
Oro Valley.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED
MOTION: Moved/Seconded (Wiant/McCook) and carried by a 6-0 vote to approve OV9-99-106,
Translational zoning for the Smith property, located east of Shannon Road and North Naranja
Drive and Exhibit "A":
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL,
OV9-99-106,THE SMITH PROPERTY, PARCEL #224-11-046E
1. Pima County Standards shall apply to all livestock and horse facilities and activities.
2. Any expansion of the existing livestock and horse facilities shall be in conformance with
the requirements of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised. Specifically, any additional
clearing or grading (including the expansion of livestock areas) of more than 1000 square
feet shall require a Type I grading permit.
8. PUBLIC HEARING: OV9-99-05 AND OV9-99-06,TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FOR THE TLC
PROPERTIES (CONTINUED)
Mr. Nodine, AICP stated that on August 5, 1998,pursuant to Section 9-471B of the Arizona Revised
Statutes, the Town of Oro Valley Mayor and Council increased its area by annexing 300 acres,
known as La Cholla/Tangerine. The Town is required to change, or "translate", the zoning on the
annexed properties from Pima County zoning designations to the closest comparable Oro Valley
zoning designation. In accordance with State law,the Town has adopted an ordinance which requires
the translation of County zoning to occur by April of 1999. He added that the property is located
north of Tangerine Road, east of the other TLC Investment Group property (# 219-46-0170), and
west of the Neville property (# 219-46-0230). Mr. Charles Townsdin is the property owner of these
two parcels.
Mr. Nodine, AICP explained that this item was continued from the February 2, 1999 Planning and
Zoning Commission meeting because of the possible changes to the General Plan as a result of the
Mr. Townsdin's development standards request.
The following TLC properties are to be translated:
1. OV9-99-5 Parcel#219-46-0200
2. OV9-99-6 Parcel#219-46-0170
Mr. Nodine, AICP stated that in the minutes of the February 2, 1999 Planning and Zoning
Commission meeting, Mr. Townsdin, stated that he is opposed to Oro Valley development standards.
However, as illustrated in the attached analysis, there aren't many differences between Pima County
SR and Oro Valley R1-144. Staff has not met with Mr. Townsdin prior to the report deadline, so
there is not an update stated in this report regarding his development standards request. Staff will be
•
APRIL 6, 1999 MINUTES,P&Z COMMISSION MEETING 12
meeting with him prior to the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting and will have an update for
review.
PUBLIC HEARING OPENED
No speakers.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED
MOTION: Moved/Seconded (Mccook/Wiant) and carried by a 6-0 vote to approve OV 9-99-05 and
OV9-99-06, Translational zoning of the TLC Properties from Pima County SR to Oro Valley R1-
144 and all the applicable development standards of the R1-144 zoning district.
5. OV9-99-52 PUBLIC HEARING: PARCEL #224-39-0020 FUTURE ARIZONA INC.
PROPERTY, TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY SR TO ORO VALLEY
R1-144, WITH CONDITIONS, LOCTED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LAMBERT
LANE AND LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD AND 9. PUBLIC HEARING: OV9-99-53
THROUGH OV9-99-109 AND OV9-99-74, OV9-99-75 AND OV9-99-103, TRANLSATIONAL
ZONING MAP 2,FROM PIMA COUNTY SR TO ORO VALLEY R1-144
1) OV9-99-53 Parcel#219-41-0090 Cheng/Phung Property
2) OV9-99-54 Parcel#219-41-0100 Cheng/Phung Property
3) OV9-99-55 Parcel#219-41-0110 Bennett Property
4) OV9-99-56 Parcel#219-41-0140 Ali Property
5) OV9-99-57 Parcel#219-41-0120 Niles Property
6) OV9-99-58 Parcel#219-41-0150 Andrews Property
7) OV9-99-59 Parcel#219-41-0160 McReynolds Property
8) OV9-99-60 Parcel#219-42-0100 Tangerine Investors Ltd. Partnership Property
9) OV9-99-61 Parcel#219-42-0120 Tangerine Investors Ltd. Partnership Property
10)OV9-99-62 Parcel#219-42-0130 Bonita Vista Co-Op Water Co. Property
11)OV9-99-63 Parcel#224-11-0190 Schall Property
12)OV9-99-64 Parcel#224-11-0220 Sianas/Kostoula Property
13)OV9-99-65 Parcel#224-11-021 A Richoux Property
14)OV9-99-66 Parcel#224-11-020A Clark Property
15)OV9-99-67 Parcel#224-11-023C Braun,H. Property
16)OV9-99-68 Parcel#224-11-0240 Braun,O.R. Property
17)OV9-99-69 Parcel#224-11-0270 Jackson Property
18)OV9-99-70 Parcel#224-11-028B Smith,T. Property
19)OV9-99-71 Parcel#224-11-028C Bertrand Property
20)OV9-99-72 Parcel#224-11-028A Hadd Property
21)OV9-99-73 Parcel#224-11-029A Goodwillie Property
22)OV9-99-76 Parcel#224-11-029B Gormally Property
23)OV9-99-77 Parcel#224-11-0320 Albee Property
24)OV9-99-78 Parcel#224-11-046D Koch Property
25)OV9-99-79 Parcel#224-11-046A Koch Property
26)OV9-99-80 Parcel#224-11-0470 Buck Property
27)OV9-99-81 Parcel#224-11-0450 Tietig Property
APRIL 6, 1999 MINUTES,P&Z COMMISSION MEETING 13
28)OV9-99-82 Parcel#224-11-0490 Tietig Property
29)OV9-99-83 Parcel#224-11-0430 Devlin Property
30)OV9-99-84 Parcel#224-11-0440 Devlin Property
31)OV9-99-85 Parcel#224-11-0420 Devlin Property
32)OV9-99-86 Parcel#224-11-0410 Devlin Property
33)OV9-99-87 Parcel#224-11-0400 Hyman Property
34)OV9-99-88 Parcel#224-11-0390 Kwo-Ming Lin/Ying Property
35)OV9-99-89 Parcel#224-11-038A Kwo-Ming Lin Property
36)OV9-99-90 Parcel#224-11-0580 Yang-Wen Lin Property
37)OV9-99-91 Parcel#224-11-0590 Kwo-Ming Lin Property
38)OV9-99-92 Parcel#224-11-0600 Lin Property
39)OV9-99-93 Parcel#224-11-061 D Kino West Investment Group Property
40)OV9-99-94 Parcel#224-11-061 C Kino West Investment Group Property
41)OV9-99-95 Parcel#224-11-0500 Coffinger Property
42)OV9-99-96 Parcel#224-11-0510 Fanelli Property
43)OV9-99-97 Parcel#224-11-0520 Snodgrass Property
44)OV9-99-98 Parcel#224-11-0530 Leonard Property
45)OV9-99-99 Parcel#224-11-0540 D'Amore Property
46)OV9-99-100 Parcel#224-11-055A Davenport Property
47)OV9-99-101 Parcel#224-11-055B City of Tucson Property
48)OV9-99-102 Parcel#224-11-0570 Glover Property
49)OV9-99-104 Parcel#224-20-022C JMK Family Properties Property
50)OV9-99-105 Parcel#224-20-001 B JMK Family Properties and Felker Property
51)OV9-99-107 Parcel#224-11-046C Stenstrom Property
52)OV9-99-108 Parcel#224-11-046B Stenstrom Property
53)OV9-99-109 Parcel#224-11-0560 Vandas,Willard, and Phylles Property
Mr. Nodine, AICP asked Chair Douglas if the Commission would remove the following items:
15,16, 41, 51, and 52 until the other translational zonings have been considered and voted on.
Chair Douglas stated that this would be acceptable with the Commission.
Mr. Nodine, AICP explained that on September 11, 1998, pursuant to Section 9-471B of the Arizona
Revised Statutes, the Town of Oro Valley Mayor and Council increased its area by annexing 857
acres, known as Map 2. The Town is required to change, or "translate", the zoning on the annexed
properties from Pima County zoning designations to the closest comparable Oro Valley zoning
designation. In accordance with State law, the Town must translate the County zoning by April of
1999.
Mr. Nodine, AICP stated that the boundaries for Map 2 are: bounded on the west by Shannon Road,
extending south approximately 1/4 mile south of Naranja Drive, extending north approximately 1/4
mile north of Tangerine Road, and extending east to La Cholla Boulevard, not including the area
known as La Cholla/Tangerine.
Mr.Nodine,AICP referenced Item 5:
In accordance with State Statutes, the Town should translate Pima County's SR zoning, which allows
single family residential (0 — 0.3 DUA), to Oro Valley's closest equivalent designation, R1-144,
Single Family Residential(also permits 0—0.3 DUA).
APRIL 6, 1999 MINUTES,P&Z COMMISSION MEETING 14
Mr. Nodine, AICP explained that a pre-annexation agreement for this property was approved by
Town Council on April 1st, 1998,which recognized that a future change in zoning may be appropriate
at a later date. It is important to note that this condition in the pre-annexation agreement does not
require the Town to approve a rezoning to a higher density at a later date.
Mr. Nodine, AICP reported that this property is in conformance with the Town's General Plan land
use map. The translational zoning of R1-144 is in conformance with the land use categories for this
property, which are Low Density Residential (0.6 - 1.2 DUA) and Low Density Residential (1.2 —2
DUA).
Mr. Nodine,AICP added that staff recommends approval of the translation of zoning on Parcel#224-
39-0020, the Future Arizona Inc. property, from Pima County SR to Oro Valley R1-144 and all
applicable development standards of the R1-144 zoning district shall apply thereto,with the condition
listed in attached pre-annexation agreement.
PUBLIC HEARING OPENED
Mark Dickerson, 9960 La Cholla, expressed his concerns for building height, livestock entitlements, and
the water pressure coming up the hill.
Gary Devlin, 5221 Camino Escuela, stated that he came to listen this evening. He expressed to the
Commission that approving the livestock entitlements is acceptable to him. However, he does not want
his neighbor to be allowed height changes.
Eric Gormally, 11600 N. Vista Del Sol, stated that he is opposed to Oro Valley making any decisions
based on the pending litigation regarding the annexation of certain property in unincorporated Pima
County.
Linda Goodwillie, 11600 Vista Del Sol, stated that she is opposed of the translational zoning until the
final decision is given by the courts.
Christine, (name undetectable on tape), 11765 N. Vista Del Sol is opposed to the annexation until the
courts decide whether or not Oro Valley can legally annex this property.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED
MOTION: Moved/Seconded (Wiant/McCook) and carried by a 6-0 vote to approve OV9-99-52,
Future Arizona Inc, property, Translational Zoning from Pima County SR to Oro Valley R1-144,
with Conditions, Located at the Southeast Corner of Lambert Lane and La Cholla Boulevard, and
all applicable conditions in the pre-annexation agreement approved by Oro Valley Town Council
April 1, 1998, and OV9-9953 through OV9-99-109 with the exception of 0, P, 00,YY, and ZZ.
MOTION: Moved/Seconded (Wiant/McCook) and carried by a 6-0 vote to approve OV9-99-74,
OV9-99-75 and OV9-99-103, Translational Zoning, Map 2, from Pima County SR to Oro Valley
R1-144,with Public School Entitlements.
.
APRIL 6, 1999 MINUTES,P&Z COMMISSION MEETING 15
PUBLIC HEARING—OV9-99-67 & 68, MAP 2 TRANSLATION OF ZONING FROM PIMA
COUNTY SR TO ORO VALLEY R1-144 WITH CHURCH ENTITLEMENTS,ADDENDUM
REPORT.
These two parcels are part of the Map 2 translational zoning and this report addresses additional Pima
County entitlements that the property owners requested.
The following properties within Map 2 are requesting Pima County entitlements:
54)OV9-99-67 Parcel#224-11-023C Braun,H. Property
55)OV9-99-68 Parcel#224-11-0240 Braun, O.R. Property
Parcel # 224-11-023 C is located on the southeast corner of Tangerine Road and Shannon Road and
Parcel#224-11-0240 is located south and adjacent to the first parcel.
In accordance with State Statutes, the Town should translate Pima County's SR zoning, which allows
single family residential (.3 DU/acre), to Oro Valley's closest equivalent designation, R1-144, Single
Family Residential (also permits .3 DU/acre). There was no pre-annexation agreement negotiated
between the above-referenced property owners and the Town.
A portion of the parcel was purchased by the Catholic Diocese. The property owners request church
entitlements and the ability to apply for a conditional use permit for a minor resort and a school.
These Pima County entitlements are outlined in Exhibit"A".
Most of the area in Map 2 is designated Rural Low Density Residential (RLDR) on the Land Use Map.
Other land use designations in this map include Parks/Open Space, Schools, and Low Density Residential.
Oro Valley R1-144 is the same or lower intensity than these designations. A church is a higher intensity use,
but it is appropriate in a residential neighborhood. A minor resort and a school are also a higher intensity use
and these impacts will be addressed in the CUP process.
Planning Staff recommends approval of the translation of zoning for parcels 224-11-023C and 224-
11-0240 from Pima County SR to Oro Valley R1-144 and all applicable development standards of the
R1-144 zoning district shall apply thereto in addition to the Pima County entitlements outlined in
Exhibit"A":
ENTITLEMENTS AND CONDITIONAL USES, PARCELS 224-11-023C and 224-11-0240
CATHOLIC DIOCESE,MAP 2
1. The permitted use of a Church in the Pima County SR zoning district will be maintained for this
property.
2. A private or parochial school use as permitted in the Pima County SR zoning district with a
Conditional Use Permit (CUP), may be permitted on this site. The applicant must apply for the CUP
under a separate process from a Development Plan.
3. A minor resort use with a Conditional Use Permit (CUP), may be permitted on this site. The applicant
must apply for the CUP under a separate process from a Development Plan.
APRIL 6, 1999 MINUTES,P&Z COMMISSION MEETING 16
4. No building shall exceed 25 feet in height. Steeples, spires, towers, and architectural elements may be
permitted up to 34 feet in height. Religious symbols placed atop such structures are not included in
the calculation of building height,but are limited to a maximum height of 5 feet.
Chair Douglas stated that Braun, Coffinger, and Stenstrom Properties are advertised as a public hearing.
PUBLIC HEARING OPENED
Herbert Braun, applicant, 11900 N. Shannon, stated that the northern part of the lot sold in July and did
not close until November.
PUBLIC HEARING OPENED
No speakers.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED
MOTION: Moved/Seconded (Moody/Wiant) and carried by a 6-0 vote to approve translational
zoning from Pima County SR to Oro Valley R1-144 and Exhibit "A" and the additional condition is
that access be limited as a temporary access and it may be closed as the Tangerine Corridor is
developed.
PUBLIC HEARING: OV9-99-95 COFFINGER, OV9-99-107 STENSTROM, and OV9-99-108
STENSTROM,TRANSLATIOINAL ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY SR TO ORO VALLEY
R1-144 WITH LIVESTOCK ENTITLEMENTS, EXHIBIT "A":
1. Pima County Standards shall apply to all livestock and horse facilities and activities.
2. Any expansion of the existing livestock and horse facilities shall be in conformance
with the requirements of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised. Specifically, any
additional clearing or grading (including the expansion of livestock areas) of more
than 1000 square feet shall require a Type I grading permit.
PUBLIC HEARING OPENED
No speakers.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED
MOTION: Moved/Seconded (Wiant/Moody) and carried by a 6-0 vote to approve OV9-99-95,
OV9-99-107 and OV9-99-108, Translational Zoning from Pima County SR to Oro Valley R1-144
with Livestock Entitlements and all conditions listed in Exhibit "A":
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION, CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL, OV9-99-95
COFFINGER, OV9-99-107 AND OV9-99-108 STENSTROM.
1. Pima County Standards shall apply to all livestock and horse facilities and activities.
APRIL 6, 1999 MINUTES,P&Z COMMISSION MEETING 17
2. Any expansion of the existing livestock and horse facilities shall be in conformance
with the requirements of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised. Specifically, any
additional clearing or grading (including the expansion of livestock areas) of more
than 1000 square feet shall require a Type I grading permit.
10. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST TO AMEND THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY GENERAL
PLAN FOR THAT AREA KNOWN AS THE ALBEE PROPERTY
Mr. Nodine, AICP summarized that the Planning and Zoning Commission initiated an amendment to the
General Plan on March 2, at the request of the property owner, Maralyn Albee. Requests for General Plan
amendments may be submitted twice a year: in February through March, and August through September.
Mr. Nodine, AICP explained that the subject parcel is 4.009 acres in size, and is located in the new
annexation area, west of La Cholla Boulevard and south of Tangerine Road. . The pending translational
zoning for this and the surrounding properties is from SR to R1-144. Access is via an unpaved road at the
western end of Glover Road. It is surrounded on the north and east sides by school district property (the
Wilson School), on the south side by an unpaved road and vacant property, and on the west by largely
vacant property and one home (see the attached location map). The property is in close proximity to a
major wash, and has relatively minor topography. Currently on the site are three structures used as
residences, and the unpaved road. School playing fields border the north and east sides
Mr. Nodine, AICP stated that the request from the property owner is to change the General Plan land use
designation from Parks/Open Space, with a backup designation of LDR 1.2, to "a medium density land use
category". The medium density land use designation permits 2.1 to 5.0 du/ac.
Mr. Nodine, AICP explained to the Commission that the Town of Oro Valley has designated this area as
acceptable for park/open space, with a backup designation of low-density residential uses 1.2 (0.6 to 1.2
dwelling units per acre). Park/open space denotes areas that are "to be precluded form development except
for public recreational facilities or nature preserves. Open space should be left in a natural state for scenic
purposes due to topographic or drainage constraints or the need to provide buffers between potentially
incompatible land uses".
Mr. Nodine, AICP reported that the General plan backup designations are recommended "in the event that
the use shown cannot be realized due to lack of funding or other factors." The low density backup
designation denotes areas " where single family residential development is desirable, but only if it is at a
density that will permit retention of a rural, open character...clustering and building envelopes would be
encouraged within this classification to ensure maximum protection of the Sonoran Desert and allocation of
open space". The requested medium density residential designation permits 2.1 to 5.0 dwelling units per
acres, and is "where typical single-family detached, townhouse, or patio home development is
suitable...these areas should be located with proximity to schools, shopping and employment".
Mr. Nodine, AICP stated that several General Plan policies are applicable in consideration of this request for
an amendment. Based on the proximity of the site to the Wilson School, policies that promote locating
residential development to school sites support the request for an amendment, as it is desirable to site schools
with residential use. Additionally, the fact that the site is not in a totally natural state, due to site disturbance
and residences, and has infrastructure in place (water and sewer are on site) lessens its value as natural open
space and supports higher density development. Conversely, the proximity of the site to a significant wash
APRIL 6, 1999 MINUTES,P&Z COMMISSION MEETING 18
and potential wildlife habitat area supports the need for a low density buffer between the school and sensitive
land. Information on vegetation and wildlife habitat has not been made available, however, a site visit
showed little disturbance on parcels around the site.
Findings of Fact:
As stated in"Focus 2020", the granting of a general plan amendment will be based on the following findings
of fact:
1. That the amendment constitutes an overall improvement to the general plan and is not solely for the
benefit of a particular landowner or owners at a particular point in time.
Based on potential impacts to the open space and riparian area, a change to medium density
residential will not constitute an overall improvement to the general plan.
2. That the amendment is consistent with the vision, goals, and policies of the general plan.
The following goals and policies are relevant to this request. Policies 1.2A and 1.3I support the
amendment,while the remainder do not.
Policy 1.2A: "Encourage the location of residential neighborhoods close to activity centers to
minimize travel times." The proximity of the site to the Wilson School supports a higher density land
use classification.
Policy 1.2D: "Institute complementary zoning near open space, parks, washes, trails, trailheads,
schools, and recreation areas to provide adequate buffer." The underlying land use category LDR 0.6
to 1.2 provides adequate and sufficient buffer between the adjacent school site and wash area. A
more intense category will generate additional traffic and may not provide adequate buffer to the
wash.
Policy 1.3I: "Ensure safe bike/pedestrian access to school sites from open space, parks and
neighborhoods." The proximity of this site to the school ensures easy, safe pedestrian access.
Policy 6.2B: "Open space preservation shall be used as a criterion in deciding the approval or denial
of land use rezoning proposals." For value as preserved open space, given that the site is already
partially disturbed,the primary benefit is that it will provide a buffer between the school and potential
park/open space site and additional low density residential.
3. That the general plan land use map does not provide appropriate optional sites for the use proposed
in the amendment.
The land use map does provide other sites appropriate for medium density residential land uses.
4. That the amendment will not adversely impact the community as a whole, or a portion of the
community without an acceptable means of mitigating these impacts through the subsequent zoning
and development process.
The requested medium-density residential designation may adversely impact the open space and
riparian area to the west,due to the potential density of up to 20 homes on the site. Mitigation such as
clustering would not provide sufficient protection of the wash and open space at this density.
Mr. Nodine, AICP stated that the Planning staff recommended that the Planning and Zoning Commission
forward the proposed General Plan amendment to the Town Council with a recommendation to retain the
current land use designation of park/open space and the backup designation LDR 0.5-1.2. An alternative to
the medium density request would be to change the designation to LDR, 1.2 - 2.0 dwelling units per acre.
This designation would be a logical transition between the school and the LDR 0.5 - 1.2 designated property
APRIL 6, 1999 MINUTES,P&Z COMMISSION MEETING 19
immediately to the south. However, because of the presence of the wash to the west and uncertainty of the
impact of higher density development on the wash, staff cannot support a recommendation to change the
General Plan land use designation.
Mrs. Albee presented a letter to Chair Douglas, stating that she would like to amend her previous request
and change the designation of the Albee property.
Mr. Nodine, AICP stated that in light of the amended request and the fact that there is a wash located on
the property in question, staff could no longer recommend that this request to amend the General Plan be
forwarded to the Town Council.
Chair Douglas asked Mrs. Albee if she would like to speak, Mrs. Albee declined.
PUBLIC HEARING OPENED
Bill Adler, 10720 N. Eagle Eye, stated that the burden should be placed upon the applicant to prove that
the findings allow for General Plan amendments. Clearly, even though the applicant has requested to
change the density, number three on the requirements will never be met. He stated that the staff report
does not state why number three has been met.
Barbara Smith, 13600 N. Como Drive, expressed her concern that Oro Valley is approving all these
changes while there is still a court case pending.
Linda Goodwillie, opposed to the proposed change in the General Plan.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED
MOTION: Moved/Seconded (Moody/Partridge) and carried by a 5-0 vote to deny a request to
amend the Town of Oro Valley General Plan for that area known as the Albee property, located in
the new annexation area, west of La Cholla Boulevard and south of Tangerine Road.
11. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST TO AMEND THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY GENERAL
PLAN FOR THAT AREA KNOWN AS THE WINCHESTER PROPERTY
Mr. Nodine, AICP reported that the Planning and Zoning Commission initiated an amendment to the General
Plan on March 2, 1999 at the request of the property owners, Ken and Iva Winchester. Requests for General
Plan amendments may be submitted twice a year, in February through March and August through
September.
Mr. Nodine, AICP explained that the subject parcel is 3.909 acres in size, located near the intersection of
First Avenue and Palisades Road, approximately 250 feet east of First Avenue. The current zoning is R1-
144. It is part of the 1995 annexation area known as the "Palisades Parcel Splits". Palisades Road
borders the north property side, a Rural Metro Fire station and R1-144 zoned vacant property the west,
and the east and south sides are bounded by developed and vacant residential property zoned R1-36. It is
important to note that although the zoning is R1-36 for 10 of the 12 parcels in the annexation area,
restrictions do not allow parcels less than 1.01 acres in size.
•
APRIL 6, 1999 MINUTES,P&Z COMMISSION MEETING 20
Mr. Nodine, AICP stated that the site is vacant and undisturbed with the exception of an unpaved 2-track
road, and it contains substantial slopes (hillside development zone standards may apply). There are no
identified protected riparian areas on the site however, the topography indicates minor drainages may be
present.
Mr. Nodine, AICP summarized that the landowners are requesting a General Plan amendment to change
the land use designation from Rural Low Density Residential (0-0.3 DU/Acre)to Low Density residential
(LDR 0.6-1.2 Du/ac).
Mr. Nodine, AICP stated that in regards to the General Plan, Oro Valley has designated this area as
acceptable for rural low-density residential uses (R-LDR). The Plan denotes "areas of large lot single family
development ...desirable in a rural environment". This is the lowest intensity land use designation category
in the General Plan, with density from 0-0.3 dwelling units per acre, and is identified as an"area where there
is a desire to retain a rural lifestyle or where protection of the natural environment is necessary". The Rural
Low-Density Residential designation allows for"clustering of residential densities in order to preserve open
space and protect the Sonoran Desert environment. Low density residential, (0.3 —2.0 du/ac) "denotes areas
where single family residential development is desirable,but only if it is at a density that will permit retention
of a rural, open character". He added that the General Plan land use designation of rural low density
residential for the Palisades Parcel Splits area is not an accurate density for the existing residential uses. The
requested low density residential designation is an accurate description of the exiting land use, and is
appropriate given the topography,which may limit any higher densities, and the absence of riparian habitats.
Mr. Nodine, AICP explained that as stated in "Focus 2020", the granting of a general plan amendment will
be based on the following findings of fact:
1. That the amendment constitutes an overall improvement to the general plan and is not solely for the
benefit of a particular landowner or owners at a particular point in time.
The current land use designation does not accurately reflect existing and future land uses in the area
immediately surrounding the property (primarily Palisades Parcel Splits), in that approximately one
half of the lots are developed at a density of at minimum one unit per 1.01 acres, and the remainder
permit development at a density compatible with the requested land use designation.
2. That the amendment is consistent with the vision, goals, and policies of the general plan.
The amendment is consistent with the following goals and policies:
Land Use Policies:
Policy 1.1K: "Consider development impacts on natural rolling terrain and emphasize low-density
development in these areas". The requested low density residential is consistent with this policy.
Policy 1.1D: "The Hillside Development Overlay Zone (HDZ) and development standards shall be
considered at the time of rezoning and shall supersede when a conflict exists between the land use
map and the HDZ standards". The average cross slope on this parcel indicates that the requested
density for the amendment should allow compliance with the HDZ standards.
Natural Resource Conservation Policies: The low density request supports both policies listed below
because it permits the designation of maximum grading limits and building envelopes, techniques
which support these policies.
APRIL 6, 1999 MINUTES,P&Z COMMISSION MEETING 21
Policy 8.1G: "Indigenous vegetation and riparian habitats should be maintained and enhanced where
possible".
Policy 8.1N: "Mass grading is prohibited for all residential developments 2 RAC and under and
strongly discouraged throughout the community".
3. That the general plan land use map does not provide appropriate optional sites for the use proposed
in the amendment.
The majority of the land use map does provide for appropriate optional sites for the proposed
residential use and density.
4. That the amendment will not adversely impact the community as a whole, or a portion of the
community without an acceptable means of mitigating these impacts through the subsequent zoning
and development process.
The amendment will not adversely affect the community because the change is compatible with
surrounding developed properties and with the General Plan designation of Master Planned
Community to the north and south of the site, where the overall residential density is limited to 2
du/ac.
Mr. Nodine, AICP stated that Planning staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission
forward the proposed General Plan amendment to the Town Council with a recommendation to change
the General Plan Land Use designation on the Winchester property from Rural Low Density Residential
(0-0.3 DU/Acre) to Low Density residential (LDR 0.6-1.2 Du/ac).
Mr. Winchester, 199 E. Fort Lowell, applicant has requested to amend the Town of Oro Valley General
Plan for his property.
PUBLIC HEARING OPENED
Bill Adler, 10720 N. Eagle Eye, Oro Valley, stated that in talking with Melissa Shaw, the planner who
wrote the report acknowledge that finding number three fails because it does not meet the existing
conditions.
Richard Bauer, 826 E. Palisades, stated that he would like to endorse everything that Mr. Adler has said.
He also stated that the ratio is one house per three acres. He explained that there is a lot of wildlife that
roams around the area. He added that the property under consideration does have a wash and really
wondered if a house could actually be built there, considering that this area is pretty hilly. Mr. Bauer
summarized that as a property owner he would really like to see more wide open space than housing.
Duane Delarco, 11484 N. 1st Avenue, and 11414 N. 1st Avenue, Oro Valley, stated the report that was
written grossly mischaracterized the current use of the affected properties. He added that one of the 1-
acre parcels is a house by itself. He stated that in effect one house per two acres is the current use. He
explained that when their property was annexed into Oro Valley they were promised that they would
continue to have the suburban ranch zoning. He feels that this would totally change the integrity of the
property.
APRIL 6, 1999 MINUTES,P&Z COMMISSION MEETING 22
Wendy King, 820 E. Palisades, have been there since 1984 and they have 3.7 acres of land. She added
that they are horse people and when they were annexed, they were promised that the integrity of the land
would stay suburban ranch. Ms. King stated that she wants to be able to keep their current horse lifestyle
and is really against this General Plan amendment.
Fred King, 820 E. Palisades, grading and paving contractor, stated that there are less than four acre there
will not be anything left of the land after its been graded for home construction. He added that the houses
that are out there now sit on larger than 1-acre lots.
Sam Sapalla, his wife Robin interpreted for him, 11404 N. 1st Avenue, Oro Valley, stated that they are the
newest residents in the neighborhood that the reason why they were here was to support the neighbors.
Mr. Sapalla signed that there is a special enclave of homes and both he and his wife feel that it is
important to keep this area the way that it is.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED
MOTION: Moved/Seconded (Wiant/Moody) and carried by a 5-0 vote to deny Request to Amend
the Town of Oro Valley General Plan for that area known as the Winchester property, located near
the intersection of First Avenue and Palisades Road.
12. PUBLIC HEARING: AMENDMENT TO THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED,
CHAPTER 4, SECTION 4-504 F. PUBLIC ART PROVISIONS, TO CHANGE SUBMITTAL
AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS
Staff is recommending that this item be continued to the May 6, 1999 Planning and Zoning Commission
meeting.
MOTION: Moved/Seconded (Wiant/McCook) and carried by a 5-0 vote to continue the
Amendment to the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised, Chapter 4, Section 4-5-4F. Public Art
Provisions, to change submittal and other requirements.
13. INITIATE COMPREHENSIVE CODE AMENDMENTS
A project to revise the zoning code (OVZCR) for consistency and clarity, while making minimal changes
in meaning.
Mr. Nodine, AICP stated that staff is recommending that this item be continued to the May 6, 1999
Commission meeting.
MOTION: Moved/Seconded (Briggs/Wiant) and carried by a 5-0 vote to Initiate Comprehensive
Code Amendments in January 2000.
14. PLANNING STAFF REPORT
Mr. Nodine, AICP stated that the Work Plan will be back for the May 6, 1999 meeting.
APRIL 6, 1999 MINUTES,P&Z COMMISSION MEETING 23
Mr. Nodine, AICP and the Commissioners discussed dates and times for the Wong Rezoning Site Tour
and direction was given to the Secretary to follow up with the Commission and set a date and time.
Due to the issues addressed at this meeting, Commissioner Partridge suggested taking a look at the
General Plan findings especially the routine use of finding#3 and establish how many of the 4 findings
are required for recommending the approval to amend the General Plan.
In answer to Chair Douglas' question, Mr. Nodine, AICP stated that staff will be looking at initiating
amending the General Plan sometime in the fall.
ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Moved/Seconded (Briggs/Wiant) and carried by a 5-0 vote to adjourn the meeting at
9:15 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
Shannon Ritchie, Administrative Secretary
F:\MINUTES\PC\1999\040699pz.doc
ORO VALLEY PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REPORT
MEETING DATE: April 6, 1999
TO: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
FROM: Dennis Silva,Jr.,Planner I
SUBJECT: Map 2,Translation of Zoning from Pima County SR to Oro Valley R1-144
BACKGROUND:
On September 11, 1998, pursuant to Section 9-471B of the Arizona Revised Statutes, the Town of Oro
Valley Mayor and Council increased its area by annexing 857 acres, known as Map 2. The Town is
required to change, or "translate", the zoning on the annexed properties from Pima County zoning
designations to the closest comparable Oro Valley zoning designation. In accordance with State law, the
Town must translate the County zoning by April of 1999.
The following properties within Map 2 are to be translated:
1. OV9-99-53 Parcel#219-41-0090 Cheng/Phung Property
2. OV9-99-54 Parcel#219-41-0100 Cheng/Phung Property
3. OV9-99-55 Parcel#219-41-0110 Bennett Property
4. OV9-99-56 Parcel#219-41-0140 Ali Property
5. OV9-99-57 Parcel #219-41-0120 Niles Property
6. OV9-99-58 Parcel#219-41-0150 Andrews Property
7. OV9-99-59 Parcel#219-41-0160 McReynolds Property
8. OV9-99-60 Parcel#219-42-0100 Tangerine Investors Ltd. Partnership Property
9. OV9-99-61 Parcel #219-42-0120 Tangerine Investors Ltd. Partnership Property
10. OV9-99-62 Parcel#219-42-0130 Bonita Vista Co-Op Water Co. Property
11. OV9-99-63 Parcel#224-11-0190 Schall Property
12. OV9-99-64 Parcel #224-11-0220 Sianas/Kostoula Property
13. OV9-99-65 Parcel#224-11-021A Richoux Property
14. OV9-99-66 Parcel#224-11-020A Clark Property
15. OV9-99-67 Parcel#224-11-023 C Braun, H. Property
16. OV9-99-68 Parcel#224-11-0240 Braun, O.R. Property
17. OV9-99-69 Parcel#224-11-0270 Jackson Property
18. OV9-99-70 Parcel#224-11-028B Smith, T. Property
19. OV9-99-71 Parcel#224-11-028C Bertrand Property
20. OV9-99-72 Parcel#224-11-028A Hadd Property
21. OV9-99-73 Parcel#224-11-029A Goodwillie Property
22. OV9-99-76 Parcel#224-11-029B Gormally Property
23. OV9-99-77 Parcel#224-11-0320 Albee Property
24. OV9-99-78 Parcel#224-11-046D Koch Property
25. OV9-99-79 Parcel#224-11-046A Koch Property
26. OV9-99-80 Parcel#224-11-0470 Buck Property
1
27. OV9-99-81 Parcel#224-11-045 .tig Property
28. OV9-99-82 Parcel#224-11-049 ;tig Property
29. OV9-99-83 Parcel# 224-11-0430 Devlin Property
30. OV9-99-84 Parcel #224-11-0440 Devlin Property
31. OV9-99-85 Parcel # 224-11-0420 Devlin Property
32. OV9-99-86 Parcel# 224-11-0410 Devlin Property
33. OV9-99-87 Parcel# 224-11-0400 Hyman Property
34. OV9-99-88 Parcel# 224-11-0390 Kwo-Ming Lin/Ying Property
35. OV9-99-89 Parcel# 224-11-03 8A Kwo-Ming Lin Property
36. OV 9-99-90 Parcel# 224-11-0580 Yang-Wen Lin Property
37. OV 9-99-91 Parcel# 224-11-0590 Kwo-Ming Lin Property
38. OV9-99-92 Parcel#224-11-0600 Lin Property
39. OV 9-99-93 Parcel# 224-11-061D Kino West Investment Group Property
40. OV9-99-94 Parcel#224-11-061 C Kino West Investment Group Property
41. OV9-99-95 Parcel#224-11-0500 Coffmger Property
42. OV 9-99-96 Parcel#224-11-0510 Fanelli Property
43. OV9-99-97 Parcel#224-11-0520 Snodgrass Property
44. OV9-99-98 Parcel#224-11-0530 Leonard Property
45. OV9-99-99 Parcel#224-11-0540 D'Amore Property
46. OV9-99-100 Parcel# 224-11-055A Davenport Property
47. OV9-99-101 Parcel# 224-11-055B City of Tucson Property
48. OV9-99-102 Parcel# 224-11-0570 Glover Property
49. OV9-99-104 Parcel#224-20-022C JMK Family Properties Property
50. OV9-99-105 Parcel#224-20-001 B JMK Family Properties and Felker Property
51. OV9-99-107 Parcel#224-11-046C Stenstrom Property
52. OV9-99-108 Parcel# 224-11-046B Stenstrom Property
53. OV9-99-109 Parcel#224-11-0560 Vandas, Willard, and Phylles Property
The following properties within Map 2 are to be translated with Public School Entitlements:
la. OV9-99-74 Parcel #224-11-0300 Amphitheater Public School District
2a. OV9-99-75 Parcel#224-11-0310 Amphitheater Public School District
3a. OV9-99-103 Parcel #224-21-0010 Amphitheater Public School District
The limits of Map 2 are as follows: bounded on the west by Shannon Road, extending south approximately
V4 mile south of Naranja Drive, extending north approximately 1/4 mile north of Tangerine Road, and
extending east to La Cholla Boulevard, not including the area known as La Cholla/Tangerine.
SUMMARY:
In accordance with State Statutes, the Town should translate Pima County's SR zoning, which allows single
family residential (.3 DU/acre), to Oro Valley's closest equivalent designation, R1-144. Single Family
Residential (also peunits .3 DU/acre). There was no pre-annexation agreement negotiated between the
above-referenced property owners and the Town.
GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE:
Most of the area in Map 2 is designated Rural Low Density Residential (RLDR) on the Land Use Map. Other land
use designations in this map include Parks/Open Space, Schools, and Low Density Residential. Oro Valley R1-144
2
v ,
27. OV9-99-81 Parcel# 224-11-045 ;tig Property
28. OV9-99-82 Parcel# 224-11-049u 1 ietig Property
29. OV9-99-83 Parcel#224-11-0430 Devlin Property
30. OV9-99-84 Parcel#224-11-0440 Devlin Property
31. OV9-99-85 Parcel# 224-11-0420 Devlin Property
32. OV9-99-86 Parcel# 224-11-0410 Devlin Property
33. OV9-99-87 Parcel#224-11-0400 Hyman Property
34. OV9-99-88 Parcel#224-11-0390 Kwo-Ming Lin/Ying Property
35. OV9-99-89 Parcel#224-11-03 8A Kwo-Ming Lin Property
36. OV9-99-90 Parcel#224-11-0580 Yang-Wen Lin Property
37. OV9-99-91 Parcel#224-11-0590 Kwo-Ming Lin Property
38. OV9-99-92 Parcel#224-11-0600 Lin Property
39. OV 9-99-93 Parcel#224-11-061D Kino West Investment Group Property
40. OV9-99-94 Parcel#224-11-061 C Kino West Investment Group Property
41. OV9-99-95 Parcel#224-11-0500 Coffinger Property
42. OV9-99-96 Parcel#224-11-0510 Fanelli Property
43. OV9-99-97 Parcel#224-11-0520 Snodgrass Property
44. OV9-99-98 Parcel#224-11-0530 Leonard Property
45. OV9-99-99 Parcel#224-11-0540 D'Amore Property
46. OV9-99-100 Parcel#224-11-055A Davenport Property
47. OV 9-99-101 Parcel#224-11-05 5B City of Tucson Property
48. OV9-99-102 Parcel#224-11-0570 Glover Property
49. OV9-99-104 Parcel#224-20-022C JMK Family Properties Property
50. OV9-99-105 Parcel#224-20-001 B JMK Family Properties and Felker Property
51. OV9-99-107 Parcel#224-11-046C Stenstrom Property
52. OV9-99-108 Parcel#224-11-046B Stenstrom Property
53. OV9-99-109 Parcel# 224-11-0560 Vandas, Willard, and Phylles Property
The following properties within Map 2 are to be translated with Public School Entitlements:
la. OV9-99-74 Parcel#224-11-0300 Amphitheater Public School District
2a. OV9-99-75 Parcel#224-11-0310 Amphitheater Public School District
3a. OV9-99-103 Parcel #224-21-0010 Amphitheater Public School District
The limits of Map 2 are as follows: bounded on the west by Shannon Road, extending south approximately
1/4 mile south of Naranja Drive, extending north approximately 1/4 mile north of Tangerine Road, and
extending east to La Cholla Boulevard, not including the area known as La Cholla/Tangerine.
SUMMARY:
In accordance with State Statutes, the Town should translate Pima County's SR zoning, which allows single
family residential (.3 DU/acre), to Oro Valley's closest equivalent designation, R1-144. Single Family
Residential (also permits .3 DU/acre). There was no pre-annexation agreement negotiated between the
above-referenced property owners and the Town.
GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE:
Most of the area in Map 2 is designated Rural Low Density Residential (RLDR) on the Land Use Map. Other land
use designations in this map include Parks/Open Space, Schools, and Low Density Residential. Oro Valley R 1-144
2
is the same or lower intensity than tl designations. Therefore, the proposed slations are in conformance with
the General Plan.
RECOMMENDATION:
Planning Staff recommends approval of the translation of zoning for the area known as Map 2 from Pima
County SR to Oro Valley R1-144 and all applicable development standards of the R l-144 zoning district
shall apply thereto.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I move to recommend approval of the zoning translation for Map 2, from Pima County SR to Oro Valley
R 1-144 and all applicable development standards of the R 1-144 zoning district.
OR
I move to recommend approval of the zoning translation for Map 2, from Pima County SR to Oro Valley
R l-144, all applicable development standards of the R 1-144 zoning district, and the following added
conditions:
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Location Map
F:,OV\OV9\1999\9-99-53\TZPC.RPT
3
: .
\iii#L\i--) 2 TF i\NSLATONAL. 'ONI NG
, 1 '
, .
2 ' ' '
8
1
. 1 ,
1 • : • 4 - 9 -
I • - 1 , 1
[
12 • - • ' - . •- - •-.. .-' : •:-. - i ,,
I.I
15 13 11 I' II
I
I
. .
14 • . .
1 17
16 I 8 21 tq.
--____
. .' 19
- 2.q
> -- .
. .
22 ,2 1 -, -
0 ',
-.-7.•
23 i -------------': : 5,
1 I .33 . - I ,
ii-
', ,
1
1 . .„
t i /.,_
• -_._--- --
24 . 29 - . - - ' ' ' ----:-
..-,
51 31 . 34 ' 35 -
r ) . ,-- -----
27 . 32 . . , . . . . ,- ,;,.____.
,,..._
. ... ........-...„, _
• - - - ,- =
52 30 7
. ,
, .--..... _
25
,. , ,...._
, . .
•--,, , , 1 i 1
1 26 41 48 ' 38
I .
4 L ' ' ----
„_,_),-1
1A') 53 .47 - ' , =_,./•, ' -
,. i----/ i / - - ir ---
, 28 43 - ... 36 37 , 39 --/ l,_ -‘, , ' _. •
1 p si ..-- /, -
,• ,,----,
:,...f......,..,......,.,...,........,.. ,.......„, .
....'7.:::''''''''''''''.."-. ; - • I 12__--._, tr—‘, —(4ii 45 46 40
Nararia Crive
I. . .
1q1
i - - -. ---...... .. -.,...,..-- . . , .- ,- ,,- • ‘2 . . ...... . - .',E --,, , ---.7 //' , • i
, 1 1
1 . - -- ,- . ‘---- ••.•.• • 54 . .. . -,. - :.-,-...: ...-.-.,,-.. - - . ..,-,:,..--., , ,. ....... ., . ... ,K ,0
i • • - - - - .:. ---.--_,••-••• . -, ' ' - . N-4
, . .
1 ,. . .. ,. . . . •,4-
1 , , • - ,'------ ,. _ - -, . ., k at 44eialp ,'-i-',, __1,x.
1 . . 49 - - 50
--..--_,
, 1 i
t-----7 -
;'?....;
, • -..,.........,,........,..--,..<.,„....-..,. , ,
.• ,,,t,,,,,.."4,4,4,,,,,,,,,-. ... , -
_,............... :., . i
,' .
ORDINANCE NO. (0)99- 2 9
AN ORDINANCE TRANSLATING THE ZONING FROM
PIMA COUNTY SR TO ORO VALLEY R1-144, FOR THE
PROPERTIES KNOWN AS MAP 2, LOCATED WEST OF
SHANNON ROAD, EXTENDING SOUTH
APPROXIMATELY 1/4 MILE SOUTH OF NARANJA DRIVE,
EXTENDING NORTH APPROXIMATELY 1/4 MILE NORTH
OF TANGERINE ROAD, AND EXTENDING EAST TO LA
CHOLLA BOULEVARD.
WHEREAS, the zoning for the properties located within Map 2 have been translated from
Pima County SR to Oro Valley R1-144 and all applicable development standards of the R1-144
zoning district shall apply;
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, has considered said translational
zoning with added conditions on these properties at a duly noticed Public Hearing, in accordance
with State Statue, and having made its recommendations to the Town Council; and
WHEREAS,the Oro Valley Town Council has duly considered the translational zoning at a
Public Hearing and finds that it is consistent with the Town's General Plan, Tangerine Corridor
Overlay District, and other Town ordinances,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL OF
THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY:
SECTION 1. That the following properties contained within Map 2 be translationally
zoned from Pima County SR to Oro Valley R1-144, and that all applicable development standards
of the R1-144 zoning district shall apply to said properties:
OV9-99-53 Parcel#219-41-0090 Cheng/Phung Property
OV9-99-54 Parcel#219-41-0100 Cheng/Phung Property
OV9-99-55 Parcel#219-41-0110 Bennett Property
OV9-99-56 Parcel#219-41-0140 Ali Property
OV9-99-57 Parcel#219-41-0120 Niles Property
OV9-99-58 Parcel#219-41-0150 Andrews Property
OV9-99-59 Parcel#219-41-0160 McReynolds Property
OV9-99-60 Parcel#219-42-0100 Tangerine Investors Ltd. Partnership Property
OV9-99-61 Parcel#219-42-0120 Tangerine Investors Ltd. Partnership Property
OV9-99-62 Parcel#219-42-0130 Bonita Vista Co-Op Water Co. Property
OV9-99-63 Parcel#224-11-0190 Schall Property
OV9-99-64 Parcel# 224-11-0220 Sianas/Kostoula Property
OV9-99-65 Parcel #224-11-021 A Richoux Property
OV9-99-66 Parcel#224-11-020A Clark Property
OV9-99-69 Parcel#224-11-0270 Jackson Property
OV9-99-70 Parcel#224-11-028B Smith, T. Property
ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-2 9(CONTINUED)
OV9-99-71 Parcel#224-11-028C Bertrand Property
OV9-99-72 Parcel#224-11-028A Hadd Property
OV9-99-73 Parcel#224-11-029A Goodwillie Property
OV9-99-76 Parcel#224-11-029B Gormally Property
OV9-99-77 Parcel#224-11-0320 Albee Property
OV9-99-78 Parcel#224-11-046D Koch Property
OV9-99-79 Parcel#224-11-046A Koch Property
OV9-99-80 Parcel#224-11-0470 Buck Property
OV9-99-81 Parcel#224-11-0450 Tietig Property
OV9-99-82 Parcel#224-11-0490 Tietig Property
OV9-99-83 Parcel#224-11-0430 Devlin Property
OV9-99-84 Parcel#224-11-0440 Devlin Property
OV9-99-85 Parcel#224-11-0420 Devlin Property
OV9-99-86 Parcel#224-11-0410 Devlin Property
OV9-99-87 Parcel#224-11-0400 Hyman Property
OV9-99-88 Parcel#224-11-0390 Kwo-Ming Lin/Ying Property
OV9-99-89 Parcel#224-11-038A Kwo-Ming Lin Property
OV9-99-90 Parcel#224-11-0580 Yang-Wen Lin Property
OV9-99-91 Parcel#224-11-0590 Kwo-Ming Lin Property
OV9-99-92 Parcel#224-11-0600 Lin Property
OV9-99-93 Parcel#224-11-061 D Kino West Investment Group Property
OV9-99-94 Parcel#224-11-061 C Kino West Investment Group Property
OV9-99-96 Parcel#224-11-0510 Fanelli Property
OV9-99-97 Parcel# 224-11-0520 Snodgrass Property
OV9-99-98 Parcel# 224-11-0530 Leonard Property
OV9-99-99 Parcel#224-11-0540 D'Amore Property
OV9-99-100 Parcel#224-11-055A Davenport Property
OV9-99-101 Parcel#224-11-055B City of Tucson Property
OV9-99-102 Parcel# 224-11-0570 Glover Property
OV9-99-104 Parcel# 224-20-022C JMK Family Properties Property
OV9-99-105 Parcel#224-20-001 B JMK Family Properties and Felker Property
OV9-99-109 Parcel#224-11-0560 Vandas, Willard, and Phylles Property
SECTION 2. That all ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be and the
same are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict;
SECTION 3. That this ordinance and the various parts thereof are hereby declared to be
severable. If any section, sub-section, sentence, clause, word or phrase of this ordinance is, for any
reason, held to be unconstitutional, such holdings shall not affect the validity of the remaining
portion of this ordinance.
ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-2 9(CONTINUED)
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley,
Arizona this 12th day of April, 1999.
Paul H. Loomis,Mayor
ATTEST:
CUmAL4.;
•
Kathryn velier, Town Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
t "
Dan. L. Dudley, Town Attorne
PUBLISH: Daily Territorial
May 11, 12, 13, 14, 1999
POSTED: May 6 - June 5, 1999
rg
(0)99-29 p.4
T \NSATCNAL.. ONiNG
4
:.:-�,..C, .
cr:1 s
i I j : i ,
, ,
, _ .
. ,
, , ,
3 5 11
: .� I
i
4 �� , . . :: I � H
•
�� taw.. a. • ^+7 wyr," ?.♦:- I I ( i
15
11
•
_. 13 •• •
14 : .- .
i j
• 17
.•
•16 • • 18
4 ,7-.21_.- .:. .......- :.-• 1
19
2.ct
I _
20 1
33 il - __
_
•
24 29, I
- _ .
•
• 34 35 ��
51 ,,; �- -�- _-
27 32 ,/�,,�/ -
25 ` `�-�--
26 4 •
41 .4$ •
38 ,rf
•
• 423 • 4i �•
-- _28 43 37 3a I , -
� - ,�
iz,,...,:::-----,
•
46
4 _-4 I i.
Narania Crve t -•—
_ I �
i . •
ti;1
•
�'-' �,^tip •• /
•�.•
• ....�ir.-. •� � �-. r•
...► z� -� i ` •'may '/\\'
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
BEFORE THE ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL
In accordance with ARS 9-462, 9-471 and Section 3-108 of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised,NOTICE
OF TRANSLATIONAL ZONING PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL
IS HEREBY GIVEN:
TIME : at or after 7:00 p.m.on MONDAY,APRIL 12,1999
PLACE: Oro Valley Town Hall
11,000 N.La Canada Drive
Oro Valley,Arizona
SUBJECT: OV9-99-53 THROUGH OV9-99-105, AND OV9-99-107 THROUGH OV9-99-109
TRANSLATING AND REZONING RECENTLY ANNEXED TERRITORY KNOWN AS
MAP 2,FROM PIMA COUNTY SR TO ORO VALLEY R1-144
THE FOLLOWING PROPERTIES WITHIN MAP 3 ARE TO BE TRANSLATED:
1. OV9-99-53 Parcel#219-41-0090 Cheng/Phung Property
2. OV9-99-54 Parcel#219-41-0100 Cheng/Phung Property
3. OV9-99-55 Parcel#219-41-0110 Bennett Property
4. OV9-99-56 Parcel#219-41-0140 Ali Property
5. OV9-99-57 Parcel#219-41-0120 Niles Property
6. OV9-99-58 Parcel#219-41-0150 Andrews Property
7. OV9-99-59 Parcel#219-41-0160 McReynolds Property
8. OV9-99-60 Parcel#219-42-0100 Tangerine Investors Ltd.Partnership Property
9. OV9-99-61 Parcel#219-42-0120 Tangerine Investors Ltd.Partnership Property
10. OV9-99-62 Parcel#219-42-0130 Bonita Vista Co-Op Water Co.Property
11. OV9-99-63 Parcel#224-11-0190 Schall Property
12. OV9-99-64 Parcel#224-11-0220 Sianas/Kostoula Property
13. OV9-99-65 Parcel#224-11-021 A Richoux Property
14. OV9-99-66 Parcel#224-11-020A Clark Property
15. OV9-99-67 Parcel#224-11-023C Braun,H.Property
16. OV9-99-68 Parcel#224-11-0240 Braun,O.R.Property
17. OV9-99-69 Parcel#224-11-0270 Jackson Property
q 6T1" 18. OV9-99-70 Parcel#224-11-028B Smith,T.Property
0V - l�- 19. OV9-99-71 Parcel#224-11-028C Bertrand Property
20. OV9-99-72 Parcel#224-11-028A Hadd Property
21. OV9-99-73 Parcel#224-11-029A Goodwillie Property
22. OV9-99-76 Parcel#224-11-029B Gormally Property
23. OV9-99-77 Parcel#224-11-0320 Albee Property
24. OV9-99-78 Parcel#224-11-046D Koch Property
25. OV9-99-79 Parcel#224-11-046A Koch Property
26. OV9-99-80 Parcel#224-11-0470 Buck Property
27. OV9-99-81 Parcel#224-11-0450 Tietig Property
28. OV9-99-82 Parcel#224-11-0490 Tietig Property
29. OV9-99-83 Parcel#224-11-0430 Devlin Property
30. OV9-99-84 Parcel#224-11-0440 Devlin Property
31. OV9-99-85 Parcel#224-11-0420 Devlin Property
32. OV9-99-86 Parcel#224-11-0410 Devlin Property
33. OV9-99-87 Parcel#224-11-0400 Hyman Property
34. OV9-99-88 Parcel#224-11-0390 Kwo-Ming Lin/Ying Property
35. OV9-99-89 Parcel#224-11-03 8A Kwo-Ming Lin Property
36. OV9-99-90 Parcel#224-11-0580 Yang-Wen Lin Property
37. OV9-99-91 Parcel#224-11-0590 Kwo-Ming Lin Property
38. OV9-99-92 Parcel#224-11-0600 Lin Property
39. OV9-99-93 Parcel#224-11-061 D Kino West Investment Group Property
40. OV9-99-94 Parcel#224-11-061 C Kino West Investment Group Property
41. OV9-99-95 Parcel#224-11-0500 Coffinger Property
42. OV9-99-96 Parcel#224-11-0510 Fanelli Property
43. OV9-99-97 Parcel#224-11-0520 Snodgrass Property
44. OV9-99-98 Parcel#224-11-0530 Leonard Property
45. OV9-99-99 Parcel#224-11-0540 D'Amore Property
46. OV9-99-100 Parcel#224-11-055A Davenport Property
47. OV9-99-101 Parcel#224-11-055B City of Tucson Property
48. OV9-99-102 Parcel#224-11-0570 Glover Property
49. OV9-99-104 Parcel#224-20-022C JMK Family Properties Property
50. OV9-99-105 Parcel#224-20-001 B JMK Family Properties and Felker Property
51. OV9-99-107 Parcel#224-11-046C Stenstrom Property
52. OV9-99-108 Parcel#224-11-046B Stenstrom Property
53. OV9-99-109 Parcel#224-11-0560 Vandas,Willard,and Phylles Property
THE FOLLOWING PROPERTIES WITHIN MAP 2 ARE TO BE TRANSLATED, WITH
PUBLIC SCHOOL ENTITLEMENTS:
1. OV9-99-74 Parcel#224-11-0300 Amphitheater Public School District
2. OV9-99-75 Parcel#224-11-0310 Amphitheater Public School District
3. OV9-99-103 Parcel#224-21-0010 Amphitheater Public School District
In accordance with Arizona State Statute, the zoning on the above-referenced properties must be translated
and rezoned from Pima County Zoning Classifications to the nearest Oro Valley Zoning Classifications.
LOCATION: All properties listed above are located within the area known as Map 2. The limits
of Map 2 are as follows: bounded on the west by Shannon Road, extending south
approximately 1/4 mile south of Naranja Drive, extending north approximately 1/4
mile north of Tangerine Drive, and extending east to La Cholla Boulevard, not
including the area known as La Cholla/Tangerine.
DESCRIPTION: A detailed location and description of Map 2 and of the parcels slated to be
translated can be obtained at the Oro Valley Town Hall.
Members of the public are invited to this meeting and will be given an opportunity to speak. An agenda for
the meeting will be made available 24 hours prior to meeting time. Should you have any questions regarding
this ,,tter,please contact Dennis Silva or David Marsh at(520)797-9797.
.).42
B / odine AICP
Planning&Zoning Administrator
Town of Oro Valley
F:\INDIVID\DJM\ANNEX\Map 2\TZNOTICETC.doc
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF ARIZONA) r.,
r
r
:ss.
COUNTY OF PIMA ) STACEY 3 T:C NSON being first
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING #224-11-0490 Tietig Property and extending east to La Cholla
BEFORE THE ORO 2 9. 0 V 9-9 9-8 3 P a r c e 1 Boulevard, not including the area is that (he) (she) is the Legal Advertising Manager
VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL #224-11-0430 Devlin Property known as La Cholla/Tangerine.
In accordance with ARS 9-462, 3 0. 0 V 9-9 9-8 4 P a r c e l DESCRIPTION: A detailed loca-
9-471 and Section 3-108 of the #224-11-0440 Devlin Property Lion and description of Map 2 and
Oro Valley Zoning Code Revises, 3 1 . 0 V 9-9 9-8 5 P a r c e I of the parcels slated to be trans- ,, a daily newspaper printed and published in the
NOTICE OF TRANSLATIONAL #224-11-0420 Devlin Property lated can be obtained at the Oro
ZONING PUBLIC HEARING BE- 3 2. O V 9-9 9-8 6 ParceI Valley Town Hall.
FORE THE O R O VALLEY #224-11-0410 Devlin Property Members of the public are invited
TOWN COUNCIL IS HEREBY 3 3. O V 9-9 9-8 7 P a r c e I to this meeting and will be given )na, and of general circulation in the City of Tucson,
GIVEN: #224-11-0400 Hyman Property ar opportunity to speak. An
TIME: at or after 7:00 p.m. on 3 4. 0 V 9-9 9-8 8 P a r c e l agenda for the meeting will be
MONDAY, APRIL 12, 1999 #224-11-0390 Kwo-Ming Lin / made available 24 hours prior to
PLACE: Oro Valley Town Hall Ying Property meeting time. Should you have grizona and elsewhere, and the hereto attached
11,000 N. La Canada Drive, Oro 3 5. 0 V 9-9 9-8 9 P a r c e I any questions regarding this mat-
Valley, Arizona #224-11-038A Kwo-Ming Lin ter, please contact Dennis Silva
SUBJECT: OV9-99-53 Property or David Marsh at (520)
THROUGH OV9-99-105. AND 3 6. 0 V 9-9 9-9 0 Par ceI 797-9797. Bryant Nodine Bryant
O V 9-9 9-1 0 7 T H R O U G H #224-11-0580 Yang-Wen Lin Nodine AICP Planning & Zoning 0'10
OV9-99-109 TRANSLATING Property Administrator Town of Oro Valley r,'t----,,
AND REZONING RECENTLY 3 7. O V 9-9 9-9 1 ParceI Pub: The Daily Territorial _
ANNEXED T E R R!T O P Y #224-1 1-0590 Kwo-Ming Lin March 29, 1999
KNOWN AS MAP 2, FROM Property Req: Town of Oro Valley
PIMA COUNTY SR TO ORO 38. OV9-99-92 Parcel pnmap2 3/29/99 do
VALLEY R i-144 #224-11-0600 Lin Property
THE FOLLOWING PROPER- 3 9. O V 9-9 9-9 3 Parcel
TIES WITHIN MAP 3 ARE TO #224-11-061D Kino West Invest-
BE TRANSLATED: ment Group Property
1 . OV9-99-53 Parcel 40. OV9-99-94 Parcel
#219-41-0090 Cheng / Phung #224-11-061C Kinc West Invest- was printed and published correctly in the regular and entire issue of said THE
Property ment Group Property
2. OV9-99-54 Parcel 4 1 . OV9-99-95 Parcel
#219-41-0100 Cheng / Phung #224-11-0500 Coffinger Property
Property 4 2. O V 9-9 9-9 6 Parcel DAILY TERRITORIAL for issues; that the first was made
3. O V 9-9 9-5 5 Parcei #224-11-0510 Fanelli Property
#219-41-01 1 0 Bennett Property 4 3. O V 9-9 9-9 7 P a r c e I
4. 0 V 9-9 9-5 6 P a r c e i #224-11-0520 Snodgrass Prop-
#219-41-0140 Ali Property arty on the day of 19
5. OV9-99-57 Parcel 44. OV9-99-98 Parcel
#219-41-0120 Niles Property #224-11-0530 Leonard Property
6. OV9-99-58 Parcei 45. OV9-99-99 Parcel
#219-41-0150 Andrews Property #224-1 1-0540 D'Amore Property and the last publication thereof was made on the .._ day of
7. OV9-99-59 Parcel 46. OV9-99-100 Parcel ;i:::
#219-41-0160 McReynolds Prop- #224-11-055A Davenport Prop-
arty arty
8. OV9-99-60 Parce': 47. OV9-99-101 Parcel MARCH 19;.)•:? ;that said publication
#219-42-0100 Tangerine Inves- #224-1 1-0558 City of Tucson
tors Ltd. Partnership Property Property
9. OV9-99-61 Parcel 48. OV9-99-102 Parcel
#219-42-0120 Tangerine Inves- #224-11-0570 Glover Property was made on each of the following dates,to-wit:
tors Ltd. Partnership Property 4 9. O V 9-99-1 0 4 Parcel
1 0. 0 V 9-9 9-6 2 P a r c e I #224-20-022C JMK Family Prop-
#219-42-0130 Bonita Vista Co- erties Property 03/ ;9/9'i)
Op Water Co. Property 5 C. O V 9-9 9-1 0 5 Parcel
1 1 . 0 V 9-9 9-6 3 P a r c e I #224-20-001 B JMK Family Prop-
#224-11-0190 Schall Property erties and Felker Property
12. OV9-99-64 Parcel 51. OV9-99-107 Parcel
#224-11-0220 Sianas / Kostoula #224-11-046C Stentrom Property
Property 52. OV9-99-108 Parcel
1 3. 0 V 9-9 9-6 5 P a r c e I #224-11-0468 Stentrom Property
#224-11-021A Richoux Property 5 3. O V 9-9 9-1 0 9 ParceI ,
1 4. O V 9-9 9-6 6 Parcei #224-11-0560 Vandas, Willard, s ,i t'' .
#224-11-020A Clark Property and Phylles Property 15. OV9-99-67 P a r c e I THE FOLLOWING PROPER Request of =:"1NN CIORO VAL.LEY
#224-11-023C Braun, H. Prop- TIES WITHIN MAP 2 ARE TO
erty BE TRANSLATED, WITH
1 6. 0 V 9-9 9-6 8 Par c e I PUBLIC SCHOOL ENTITLE-
#224-11-0240 Braun, O.R. Prop- MENTS:
arty 1 . OV9-99-74 Parcel
1 7. O V 9-9 9-6 9 Parcel #224-1 1-0300 Amphitheater
#224-11-0270 Jackson Property Public School District
18. OV9-99-70 Parcel 2. OV9-99-75 Parcel Iaii3r
The
#224-11-028B Smith,T. Property #224-1 1-031 0 Amphitheater
19. 0 V 9 99 71 P a r c e I PublicTerritorial'
School District
#224-11-028C Bertrand Property 3. O V 9-9 9-1 0 3 P a r c e I
20. OV9-99-72 Parcel #224-21-0010 Amphitheater
#224-11-028A Hadd Property Public School District
21 . O V 9-9 9-7 3 P a r c e I In accordance with Arizona State
#224-11-029A Goodwillie Prop- Statute,the zoning on the above- By : ',...,."----'. . ft*..fad(Alt
arty referenced properties must be
22. 0 V 9-9 9-7 6 P a r c e I translated and rezoned from
#224-11-029B Gormally Property Pima County Zoning Ciassifica-
2 3. 0 V 9-9 9-7 7 P a r c e I tions to the nearest Oro Valley Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of
#224-11-0320 Albee Property Zoning Classification.
24. O V 9-9 9-7 8 Parcel LOCATION: All properties listed
#224-11-046D Koch Property above are located within the area �''r'f'
25. OV9-99-79 P a r c e I known as Map 2. The limits of 19 �r��''' ' iA-
#224-11-046A Koch Property Map 2 are as follows: bounded � C �' G G M C ��
2 6. O V 9-9 9-8 0 P a r c e I on the west by Shannon Road, ;`'=�r4' ^�N -E,'
#224-11-0470 Buck Property extending south approximately "� •c Q��i UC-APB�I�h�`
2 7. 0 V 9-9 9-8 1 P a r c e I 1/4 mile south of Naranja Drive, t, �. � ,>�, :Pe
RYPUB '7
#224-11-0450 Tietig Property extending north approximately ' ..`' �" ., �j`"�AC0U
v r�042 8. O V 9-9 9-8 2 P a r c e I 1/4 mile north of Tangerine Drive. r�',, .._,o, ., cX, r� = •,j.s-•rNotary Public in and for the C a#�Ra1 ;'S of Arizona
My Commission Expires:4'43/6'
1.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
BEFORE THE ORO VALLEY PLANNING&ZONING COMMISSION
In accordance with ARS 9-462, 9-471 and Section 3-108 of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised,NOTICE
OF TRANSLATIONAL ZONING PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE ORO VALLEY PLANNING &
ZONING COMMISSION IS HEREBY GIVEN:
TIME : at or after 6:00 p.m.on TUESDAY,APRIL 6th, 1999
PLACE: Oro Valley Town Hall
11,000 N.La Canada Drive
Oro Valley,Arizona
SUBJECT: OV9-99-53 THROUGH OV9-99-105, AND OV9-99-107 THROUGH OV9-99-109
TRANSLATING AND REZONING RECENTLY ANNEXED TERRITORY KNOWN
AS MAP 2,FROM PIMA COUNTY SR TO ORO VALLEY R1-144
THE FOLLOWING PROPERTIES WITHIN MAP aARE TO BE TRANSLATED:
1. OV9-99-53 Parcel#219-41-0090 Cheng/Phung Property
2. OV9-99-54 Parcel#219-41-0100 Cheng/Phung Property
3. OV9-99-55 Parcel#219-41-0110 Bennett Property
4. OV9-99-56 Parcel#219-41-0140 Ali Property
5. OV9-99-57 Parcel#219-41-0120 Niles Property
6. OV9-99-58 Parcel#219-41-0150 Andrews Property
7. OV9-99-59 Parcel#219-41-0160 McReynolds Property
8. OV9-99-60 Parcel#219-42-0100 Tangerine Investors Ltd. Partnership Property
9. OV9-99-61 Parcel#219-42-0120 Tangerine Investors Ltd. Partnership Property
10. OV9-99-62 Parcel#219-42-0130 Bonita Vista Co-Op Water Co.Property
11. OV9-99-63 Parcel#224-11-0190 Schall Property
12. OV9-99-64 Parcel#224-11-0220 Sianas/Kostoula Property
13. OV9-99-65 Parcel#224-11-021 A Richoux Property
14. OV9-99-66 Parcel#224-11-020A Clark Property
15. OV9-99-67 Parcel#224-11-023C Braun,H.Property
16. OV9-99-68 Parcel#224-11-0240 Braun,O.R.Property
17. OV9-99-69 Parcel#224-11-0270 Jackson Property
18. OV9-99-70 Parcel#224-11-028B Smith,T.Property
19. OV9-99-71 Parcel#224-11-028C Bertrand Property
20. OV9-99-72 Parcel#224-11-028A Hadd Property
21. OV9-99-73 Parcel#224-11-029A Goodwillie Property
22. OV9-99-76 Parcel#224-11-029B Gormally Property
23. OV9-99-77 Parcel#224-11-0320 Albee Property
24. OV9-99-78 Parcel#224-11-046D Koch Property
25. OV9-99-79 Parcel#224-11-046A Koch Property
26. OV9-99-80 Parcel#224-11-0470 Buck Property
27. OV9-99-81 Parcel#224-11-0450 Tietig Property
28. OV9-99-82 Parcel#224-11-0490 Tietig Property
29. OV9-99-83 Parcel#224-11-0430 Devlin Property
30. OV9-99-84 Parcel#224-11-0440 Devlin Property
31. OV9-99-85 Parcel#224-11-0420 Devlin Property
M
32. OV9-99-86 Parcel#224-11-0410 Devlin Property
33. OV9-99-87 Parcel#224-11-0400 Hyman Property
34. OV9-99-88 Parcel#224-11-0390 Kwo-Ming Lin/Ying Property
35. OV9-99-89 Parcel#224-11-03 8A Kwo-Ming Lin Property
36. OV9-99-90 Parcel#224-11-0580 Yang-Wen Lin Property
37. OV9-99-91 Parcel#224-11-0590 Kwo-Ming Lin Property
38. OV9-99-92 Parcel#224-11-0600 Lin Property
39. OV9-99-93 Parcel#224-11-061 D Kino West Investment Group Property
40. OV9-99-94 Parcel#224-11-061 C Kino West Investment Group Property
41. OV9-99-95 Parcel#224-11-0500 Coffinger Property
42. OV9-99-96 Parcel#224-11-0510 Fanelli Property
43. OV9-99-97 Parcel#224-11-0520 Snodgrass Property
44. OV9-99-98 Parcel#224-11-0530 Leonard Property
45. OV9-99-99 Parcel#224-11-0540 D'Amore Property
46. OV9-99-100 Parcel#224-11-055A Davenport Property
47. OV9-99-101 Parcel#224-11-055B City of Tucson Property
48. OV9-99-102 Parcel#224-11-0570 Glover Property
49. OV9-99-104 Parcel#224-20-022C JMK Family Properties Property
50. OV9-99-105 Parcel#224-20-001 B JMK Family Properties and Felker Property
51. OV9-99-107 Parcel#224-11-046C Stenstrom Property
52. OV9-99-108 Parcel#224-11-046B Stenstrom Property
53. OV9-99-109 Parcel#224-11-0560 Vandas,Willard,and Phylles Property
THE FOLLOWING PROPERTIES WITHIN MAP 2 ARE TO BE TRANSLATED, WITH
PUBLIC SCHOOL ENTITLEMENTS:
1. OV9-99-74 Parcel#224-11-0300 Amphitheater Public School District
2. OV9-99-75 Parcel#224-11-0310 Amphitheater Public School District
3. OV9-99-103 Parcel#224-21-0010 Amphitheater Public School District
In accordance with Arizona State Statute, the zoning on the above-referenced properties must be translated
and rezoned from Pima County Zoning Classifications to the nearest Oro Valley Zoning Classifications.
LOCATION: All properties listed above are located within the area known as Map 2. The limits
of Map 2 are as follows: bounded on the west by Shannon Road, extending south
approximately 1/4 mile south of Naranja Drive, extending north approximately 1/4
mile north of Tangerine Drive, and extending east to La Cholla Boulevard, not
including the area known as La Cholla/Tangerine.
DESCRIPTION: A detailed location and description of Map 2 and of the parcels slated to be
translated can be obtained at the Oro Valley Town Hall.
Members •f the public are invited to this meeting and will be given an opportunity to speak. An agenda for
the me, ing will be made available 24 hours prior to meeting time. Should you have any questions Aregar. :this r . er, .1 ase contact Dennis Silva or David Marsh at(520)797-9797.
Brya�"'odine AICP
Plannin:4: Zoning Administrator
Town of Oro Valley
\\OV PZD\PZ 1\INDIVID\DJM\ANNEX\Map 2\TZNOTICE.PZ.doc
POSTED:
3/19/99
1 100AM
SR
,,v, ,,•. AFFIDAVIT OF Pt IBLICATION
STATE OF ARIZONA)
:ss.COUNTY OF PIMA 1 '` AC• Y S I I NSON being first
NOTICE OF #224-11-0450 Tietig Property extending south approximately
PUBLIC HEARING 28. 0 V 9-9 9-8 2 P a r ce I 1/4 mile south of Naranja Drive, �s that (he) (she) is the Legal Advertising Manager
BEFORE THE ORO #224-11-0490 Tietig Property extending north approximately
VALLEY PLANNING & 2 9. O V 9-9 9-8 3 Par ce I 1/4 mile north of Tangerine Drive,
ZONING COMMISSION #224-11-0430 Devlin Property and extending east to La Cholla
In accordance with ARS 9-462, 3 0. 0 V 9-9 9-8 4 P a r c e I Boulevard, not including the area _, a daily newspaper printed and published in the
9-471 and Section 3-108 of the #224-11-0440 Devlin Property known as La Cholla/Tangerine.
Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised, 3 1 . 0 V 9-9 9-8 5 P a r ce t DESCRIPTION: A detailed loca-
NOTICE OF TRANSLATIONAL #224-11-0420 Devlin Property tion and description of Map 2 and
ZONING PUBLIC HEARING BE- 3 2. O V 9-9 9-8 6 P a r c e l of the parcels slated to be trans- Ona, and of eneral circulation in the Cit of Tucson,
FORE THE ORO VALLEY PLAN- #224-11-0410 Devlin Property lated can be obtained at the Oro g y
NING & ZONING COMMISSION 33. 0V9-99-87 P a r c e I Valley Town Hall.
IS HEREBY GIVEN: #224-11-0400 Hyman Property Members of the public are invited
TIME: at or after 6:00 p.m. on 3 4. O V 9-9 9-8 8 P a r c e 1 to this meeting and will be given Arizona and elsewhere and the hereto attached
TUESDAY, APRIL 6th, 1999 #224-11-0390 Kwo-Ming Lin / an opportunity to speak. An
PLACE: Oro Valley Town Hall Ying Property agenda for the meeting will be
11,000 N. La Canada Drive Oro 3 5. O V 9-9 9-8 9 Parcel made available 24 hours prior to ..
Valley, Arizona #224-11-038A Kwo-Ming Lin meeting time. Should you have
S U B J E CT: 0 V 9-9 9-5 3 Property any questions regarding this mat-
THROUGH OV9-99-105, AND 3 6. 0 V 9-9 9-9 0 P a r c e I ter, please contact Dennis Silva "ERTy
OV 9-99-1 0 7 THROUGH #224-11-0580 Yang-Wen Lin or David Marsh at (520)
OV9-99-109 TRANSLATING Property 797-9797. Bryant Nodine Bryant
AND REZONING RECENTLY 3 7. O V 9-9 9-9 1 Parcel Nodine AICP Planning & Zoning
ANNEXED TERRITORY #224-1 1-0590 Kwo-Ming Lin Administrator Town of Oro Valley
KNOWN AS MAP 2, F ROM Property Pub: The Daily Territorial
PIMA COUNTY SR TO ORO 38. OV9-99-92 P a r c e I March 22, 1999
VALLEY R1-144 #224-11-0600 Lin Property Reg: Town of Oro Valley
THE FOLLOWING PROPER- 39. OV9-99-93 Parcel
TIES WITHIN MAP 3 ARE TO #224-11-061D Kino West Invest-
BE TRANSLATED: ment Group Property Drrectly in the regular and entire issue of said THE
1 . OV9-99-53 Parce: 40. OV9-99-94 Parcel
#219-41-0090 Cheng / Phung #224-11-061C Kino West Invest-
Property ment Group Property
2. O V 9-9 9-54 Parcel 4 1 . O V 9-9 9-95 Parcel DAILY TERRITORIAL for issues; that the first was made
#219-41-0100 Cheng / Phung #224-11-0500 Coffinger Property
Property 42. OV9-99-96 Parcei
3. 0V9-99-55 P a r c e I #224-11-0510 Fanelli Property
#219-41-0110 Bennett Property 4 3. 0 V 9-9 9-9 7 P a r c e I on the e:',� day of 19
4. O V 9-9 9-56 Parcel #224-11-0520 Snodgrass Prop- ',l'I i:: MARCH
#219-41-0140 Ali Property erty
5. OVS-99-57 Parcel 44. OV9-99-98 Parcel
#219-41-0120 Niles Property #224-11-0530 Leonard Property and the last publication thereof was made on the 9 'EI�-j day of
6. OV9-99-58 Parcel 45. OV9-99-99 Parcel
#219-41-0150 Andrews Property #224-11-0540 D'Amore Property
7. OV9-99-59 Parcel 46. OV9-99-100 Parcel 19 r1'fJ
#219-41-0160 McReynolds Prop- #224-11-055A Davenport Prop- ;that said publication
arty erty
8. OV9-99-60 Parcel 47. OV9-99-101 Parcel
#219-42-0100 Tangerine Inves- #224-11-055B City of Tucson
tors Ltd. Partnership Property Property was made on each of the following dates,to-wit:
9. OV9-99-61 Parcel 48. OV9-99-102 Parcel
#219-42-0120 Tangerine Inves- #224-11-0570 Glover Property f,,
tors Ltd. Partnership Property 49. O V 9-99-1 0 4 Parcel •�t»�,.»��/22/9 9
1 0. 0 V 9-9 9-6 2 P a r c e I #224-20-022C JMK Family Prop-
#219-42-0130 Bonita Vista Co- erties Property
Op Water Co. Property 50. OV9-99-105 Parcel r`
1 1 . 0 V 9-9 9-6 3 P a r c e I #224-20-001 B JMK Family Prop- ,
#224-11-0190 Schall Property erties and Felker Property
12. OV9-99-64 Parcel 51. OV9-99-107 Parcel
#224-11-0220 Sianas / Kostoula #224-11-046C Stenstrom Prop-
Property arty
13. OV9-99-65 Parcel 52. OV9-99-108 Parcel
#224-11-021A Richoux Property #224-11-046B Stenstrom Prop- Request of"�I,�J � OF ORO VALLEY
14. OV9-99-66 Parcel erty
#224-11-020A Clark Property 53. O V 9-9 9-1 0 9 Parcel
1 5. O V 9-9 9-6 7 Parcel #224-11-0560 Vandas, Willard,
#224-11-023C Braun, H. Prop- and Phylles Property
erty THE FOLLOWING PROPER-
16. 0V9-99-68 Parcel TIES WITHIN MAP 2 ARE TO
#224-11-0240 Braun, O.R. Prop- BE TRANSLATED, WITH
erty PUBLIC SCHOOL ENTITLE-
17. OV9-99-69 Parcel MENTS: The
#224-11-0270 Jackson Property 1 . OV9-99-74 P a r c e I
0 Amphitheater al Territonal•
- I #224-11-0300, 030
18. OV9 99-70 Parcel
#224-11-028B Smith,T. Property Public School District
1 9. OV9-99-71 Parcel 2. OV9-99-75 Parcel
#224-11-028C Bertrand Property #224-1 1-031 0 Amphitheater
20. 0V9-99-72 P a r c e I Public School District
#224-11-028A Hadd Property 3. O V 9-9 9-1 0 3 Parcel 3y �� t/1 `"� r
2 1 . O V 9-9 9-73 Parcel #224-21-0010 Amphitheater , ,L e-'44N
,
#224-11-029A Goodwillie Prop- Public School District
erty In accordance with Arizona State
2 2. 0 V 9-9 9-7 6 P a r c e I Statute,the zoning on the above- Subscribed and sworn to before me this . .r•�• . day of �� � ;t:h
#224-11-029B Gormally Property referenced properties must be ;•-»:•• ,t-
2 3. 0 V 9-9 9-7 7 P a r c e I translated and rezoned from
#224-11-0320 Albee Property Pima County Zoning Classifica-
2 4. 0 V 9-9 9-7 8 P a r c e I tions to the nearest Oro Valley 19:-, SEAL
#224-11-0460 Koch Property Zoning Classifications. 11,DAWN OFFICIAL DEAL
2 5. 0 V 9-9 9-7 9 P a r c e I LOCATION: All properties listed
OUGALL
#224-1 1-046A Koch Property above are located within the area NOTARY PUBLIC-ARIZONA
2 6. O V 9-9 9-8 0 P a r c e I known as Map 2. The limits of �, 1/4; PIMA COUNTY
#224-11-0470 Buck Property Map 2 are as follows: bounded «
27 O V 9-9 9-8 1 Parcel on the west by Shannon Road, %11..,( 0 My Comm. Expires Sept.20,2002
Notary Public in an for the County of Pima,State of Arizona
My Commission Expires: cr)