HomeMy WebLinkAboutOV999107 ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-
30 vUg ce`t
AN ORDINANCE TRANSLATING THE ZONING FROM
PIMA COUNTY SR TO ORO VALLEY R1-144, WITH
CONDITIONS, ON THOSE PROPERTIES KNOWN AS THE
STENSTROM FAMILY PROPERTIES, AND THE
PROPERTY KNOWN AS THE COFFINGER FAMILY
PROPERTY,LOCATED WITHIN MAP 2; AND REPEALING
ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH.
WHEREAS,the owners of certain real property known as the Stenstrom Family Properties,
and the Coffinger Family Properties, located within Map 2, have requested that their existing horse
and cattle entitlements under Pima County Development Standards be preserved; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, has considered said translational
zoning with added conditions on these properties at a duly noticed Public Hearing, in accordance
with State Statue, and having made its recommendations to the Town Council; and
WHEREAS, the Oro Valley Town Council has duly considered the translational zoning
with added conditions at a Public Hearing and finds that it is consistent with the Town's General
Plan, and other Town ordinances,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL OF
THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY:
SECTION 1. That the Stenstrom Family Properties and the Coffinger Family Properties,
contained within Map 2, be translationally zoned from Pima County SR to Oro Valley R 1-144,
and that all applicable development standards of the R1-144 zoning district shall apply thereto to
said properties.
SECTION 2. That Pima County Standards shall apply to all livestock and horse
facilities and activities on said properties.
SECTION 3. That any expansion of the existing livestock and horse facilities shall be
in conformance with the requirements of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised. Specifically, any
additional clearing or grading (including the expansion of livestock areas) of more than 1000
square feet shall require a Type I grading permit.
SECTION 4. That all ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be and the
same are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict;
SECTION 5. That this ordinance and the various parts thereof are hereby declared to be
severable. If any section, sub-section, sentence, clause, word or phrase of this ordinance is, for any
reason, held to be unconstitutional, such holdings shall not affect the validity of the remaining
portion of this ordinance.
(0)99-30 p.2
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley,
Arizona this 12 day of April 1999.
Paul H. Loomis,Mayor
ATTEST:
Cu- Als
Ka Cuvelier, Town Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Dan. L. Dudley, Town •ttorney
PUBLISH: Daily Territorial
May 6, 7, 10, 11, 1999
POSTED: May 3 - June 2, 1999
rg
Stenstrom Translational Zoning : SR to RI- 144, with Additional Horse Entitlements
, ,
ii z c 2 ____ I____
___ _
_J
j_____ _
0
r ..
L La Cholla/Tangerine: ,
SR to R1-144 w
a
b
County SR [a
--
-y- I me
Map 2: SR to R1-1� � � 6 4 :� al In
sis
, -5 ;pia no
09_ dileAlL,M MI
al reri""111111151111111111
_„ , 75 p i Willa
(mc 4,4 Alkimoor
(t3 VI allot
--1 -vft puss
II 1E19
Nac pja-Driue_ + ,
_ _ -0 r
„, 4 INA
al
�_ \ _--- - . c
SR R1-144 ` •S
eaksa IA=II
ii,7:::: 8 AI I ...
- 0
c IWO$ P A F.4 I I
no
co a otti al pion
_.„_,,.. 41
- '
I G a I � �i�y,
1 . ,,-, EN.,..,
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 Feet
�•� .............. �. 4/7/99
COFFINGER FAMILY PROPERTY TRANSLATIONAL ZONING WITH HORSE ENTITLEMENTS
Glover Road
0
0
xz 6� S
Naranja Drive
ORO VALLEY PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REPORT
MEETING DATE: April 6th, 1999
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: David Marsh, Planner I
SUBJECT: OV9-99-107 and OV9-99-108 Parcel #224-11-046B and #224-11-046C
Stenstrom Properties, Translational Zoning from Pima County SR to Oro
Valley R1-144, with Additional Horse Entitlements, Located East of Shannon
Road, and North of Naranja Drive-Addendum
BACKGROUND:
In September, 1998, pursuant to Section 9-471B of the Arizona Revised Statutes, the Town of Oro
Valley Mayor and Council annexed the area known as Map 2. The Town is required to change, or
"translate" the zoning on the annexed properties from Pima County zoning designations to the
closest comparable Oro Valley zoning designation. In accordance with State law, the Town has
adopted an ordinance which requires the translation of County zoning to occur by April of 1999.
The attached map identifies the location of the parcels of land owned by the Stenstrom family. The
property is located east of Shannon Road, and approximately 1/2 mile north of Naranj a Drive.
SUMMARY:
In accordance with State Statutes, the Town should translate Pima County's SR zoning, which
allows single family residential (0 - 0.3 DUA), to Oro Valley's closest equivalent designation, RI-
144, Single Family Residential (also permits 0 - 0.3 DUA).
There was no pre-annexation agreement negotiated between the property owner and the Town;
however, the property owner requested during the annexation process that their existing horse rights
under Pima County standards be preserved. Staff has met with the applicant on this issue, and agree
with the applicant's request to preserve their existing horse rights, with the conditions listed in
Exhibit"A".
GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE:
This property is in conformance with the Town's General Plan land use map. The land use category
for this area is Rural Low Density Residential (0 to 0.3 DU/acre) which complies with the proposed
translated zoning of R 1-144.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the translation of zoning on Parcel #224-11-046B and #224-11-
046C, the Stenstrom properties, from Pima County SR to Oro Valley R1-144 and all applicable
development standards of the R1-144 zoning district shall apply thereto,with the conditions listed in
Exhibit "A". These conditions are similar to those placed on the Miller and Smith properties,
located to the north.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I move to recommend approval of OV9-99-107 and OV9-99-108, translating zoning of Parcel #
224-11-046B and #224-11-046C, the Stenstrom properties, from Pima County SR to Oro Valley
R1-144 and all applicable development standards of the R1-144 zoning district, with the conditions
listed in Exhibit"A".
OR
I move to recommend approval of OV9-99-107 and OV9-99-108,translating zoning of Parcel#
224-11-046B and#224-11-046C,the Stenstrom properties, from Pima County SR to Oro Valley
R1-144 and all applicable development standards of the R1-144 zoning district,with the conditions
listed in Exhibit"A", and the following added conditions:
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Exhibit"A"—Conditions for Approval
2. Letter from property owner
F:\OV\OV9\1999\9-99-107\TZPZ.RPT.doc
2
EXHIBIT "A"
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL
OV9-99-107 AND OV9-99-108
THE STENSTROM PROPERTIES
PARCEL #224-11-046B AND #224-11-046C
1. Pima County Standards shall apply to all livestock and horse facilities and activities.
2. Any expansion of the existing livestock and horse facilities shall be in conformance with the
requirements of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised. Specifically, any additional clearing or
grading (including the expansion of livestock areas) of more than 1000 square feet shall require a
Type I grading permit.
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: April 12th, 1999
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL
FROM: David Marsh, Planner I
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING, ORDINANCE NO.(0)99- ,OV9-99-107 AND OV9-99-108 PARCEL
#224-11-046B AND #224-11-046C STENSTROM PROPERTIES, AND OV9-99-95 PARCEL
#224-11-0500 COFFINGER PROPERTY, TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA
COUNTY SR TO ORO VALLEY R1-144, WITH ADDITIONAL HORSE
ENTITLEMENTS, LOCATED EAST OF SHANNON ROAD, AND NORTH OF
NARANJA DRIVE -ADDENDUM
BACKGROUND:
In September, 1998, pursuant to Section 9-471 B of the Arizona Revised Statutes, the Town of Oro Valley Mayor
and Council annexed the area known as Map 2. The Town is required to change, or "translate" the zoning on the
annexed properties from Pima County zoning designations to the closest comparable Oro Valley zoning
designation. In accordance with State law, the Town has adopted an ordinance which requires the translation of
County zoning to occur by April of 1999.
The attached maps identify the location of the parcels of land owned by the Stenstrom and Coffinger families. The
properties are located east of Shannon Road, and approximately y/2 mile north of Naranj a Drive.
SUMMARY:
In accordance with State Statutes, the Town should translate Pima County's SR zoning, which allows single family
residential (0 - 0.3 DUA), to Oro Valley's closest equivalent designation, R1-144, Single Family Residential (also
permits 0 - 0.3 DUA).
There were no pre-annexation agreements negotiated between the property owners and the Town; however, the
property owners have requested during the annexation process that their existing horse rights under Pima County
standards be preserved. Staff agrees with the applicant's request to preserve their existing horse rights, with the
conditions listed in the Ordinance.
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION ACTION:
On April 6t'', 1999,the Planning &Zoning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval of these items.
GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE:
The properties are in conformance with the Town's General Plan land use map. The land use category for this area
is Rural Low Density Residential (0 to 0.3 DU/acre) which complies with the proposed translated zoning of R1-
144.
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 2
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the translation of zoning on Parcel#224-11-046B and#224-11-046C, the Stenstrom
properties, and Parcel #224-11-0500, the Coffinger property, from Pima County SR to Oro Valley R1-144 and all
applicable development standards of the R1-144 zoning district shall apply thereto, with the conditions listed in
Exhibit"A". These conditions are similar to those placed on the Miller and Smith properties, located to the north.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I move to approve Ordinance No. (0)99- , OV9-99-107 and OV9-99-108, translating zoning of Parcel # 224-
11-046B and#224-11-046C,the Stenstrom properties, and OV9-99-95,translating zoning of Parcel #224-11-0500,
the Coffinger properties, from Pima County SR to Oro Valley R1-144 and all applicable development standards of
the R 1-144 zoning district,with the conditions listed in the Ordinace.
OR
I move to approve Ordinance No. (0)99- , OV9-99-107 and OV9-99-108,translating zoning of Parcel#224-
11-046B and#224-11-046C,the Stenstrom properties, and OV9-99-95,translating zoning of Parcel#224-11-0500,
the Coffinger properties, from Pima County SR to Oro Valley R1-144 and all applicable development standards of
the R1-144 zoning district, with the conditions listed in Ordinance, and the following added conditions: .
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Ordinace No. (0)99- .
2. Location Maps
3. Letters of Request from the Property Owners
Planning and Zoning Administrator
Community Development Director
Town Manager
F:\ov\ov9\1999\9-99-107\tztc.RPT.doc
. •
MINUTES OF THE
ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL
SPECIAL SESSION
ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS
11,000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE
APRIL 12, 1999
CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 p.m.
PRESENT: Paul Loomis,Mayor
Francis LaSala, Council Member
Wayne Bryant, Council Member
EXCUSED: Dick Johnson, Vice Mayor
Paul Parisi, Council Member
1. PUBLIC HEARING — ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-24 STEWART TITLE AND
TRUST PROPERTY(AKA CHAPARRAL HEIGHTS), TRANSLATIONAL
ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY CR-1 TO ORO VALLEY R1-20, WITH
CONDITIONS (LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LAMBERT
LANE AND LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD)
Robert C. Stubbs, representing the applicant. Mr. Stubbs stated this is a translational
zoning,translating from Pima County CR-1 to Oro Valley R1-20 limited to 150 units per
acre. He stated the Planning& Zoning Commission's recommendations that the
minimum lot size should be 24,000 square feet rather than the 20,000 square feet
permitted in the R1-20, is in conflict with the pre-annexation agreement. He pointed out
that the height in CR-1 is 34 feet, the height in R1-20 is 18 feet. He asked that the Town
Council adopt the ordinance with R1-20 limited to 150 units per acre as bound by the pre-
annexation agreement.
Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing.
Alan Lathram, 1750 W. Tangerine Road. Mr. Lathram asked about the requirement of
preserving the ironwood trees in the area.
Dr. Chatfield explained the process the Town follows to preserve vegetation.
Mr. Lathram voiced his opposition to the translational zonings scheduled for adoption
this evening and pointed out that these are all within the Town of Tortolita.
Barbara Smith, 13600 N. Como Drive. Mrs. Smith voiced her opposition to all of the
translational zonings scheduled for adoption this evening and distributed the most recent
ruling issued by the Arizona Court of Appeals and dated 11-24-98. She stated that since
•
04-12-99 Minutes, Council Special Session 2
the Town of Tortolita was not disincorporated by the Arizona Court of Appeals,the
annexations voted on are in the Town of Tortolita.
Bill Adler, 10720 N. Eagle Eye Place. Mr. Adler objected to the Town entering into a
pre-annexation agreement that does not meet the Town's General Plan.
Steve Shocat, 1795 W. Hunter Road. Mr. Shocat stated the importance of honoring the
restrictions that Pima County placed on the parcel on the corner of La Cholla/Lambert
Lane. He stated there was concern about losing the owl habitat, saguaros and ironwood
trees. He pointed out that ironwood trees are hard to transplant.
Mayor Loomis closed the public hearing.
Council Member LaSala stated if we don't translate this zoning,the developers can
attempt to build anything they want on that property.
A MOTION was made by Council Member LaSala. MOTION SECONDED by Mayor
Loomis to adopt Ordinance No. (0)99-24 from Pima County CR-1 to Oro Valley R1-20
and all applicable development standards of the R1-20 zoning district with the conditions
listed in (0)99-24 and the pre-annexation agreement dated 4-9-98; and that Section 7 of
(0)99-24 shall be removed.
In response to a question by Mayor Loomis,Dr. Chatfield explained that in the pre-
annexation agreement it states "that the developer shall preserve in place,relocate or
mitigate significant onsite cacti and trees, including ironwood trees as recommended by
the preservation plan as approved by the Town." He explained that Oro Valley was the
first jurisdiction in this area to require native plant preservations plans. He explained that
registered landscape architects are required to survey the site for significant native
vegetation and then a preservation plan is developed. He stated that if a significant tree
or cacti is in jeopardy because of development, mitigation is required in the form of
movement or replacement. He agreed that ironwood trees are difficult to transplant and
staff direction is to maintain as many as possible, but he pointed out that there are 2
healthy transplanted ironwood trees at the entrance to the Town Hall.
In response to a question by Council Member Bryant regarding his right to vote on the
translational zonings, Town Attorney Tobin Sidles replied that since he has not seen any
paperwork, he does not know if Mr. Bryant has been withdrawn or not from the lawsuit
MOTION carried 2— 1 with Council Member Bryant opposed.
2. PUBLIC HEARING—ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-25 OV9-99-52 PARCEL 224-39-
0020 FUTURE ARIZONA INC. PROPERTY,TRANSLATIONAL ZONING
FROM PIMA COUNTY SR TO ORO VALLEY R1-144 WITH CONDITIONS
(LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LAMBERT LANE AND LA
CHOLLA BOULEVARD)
Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing.
04-12-99 Minutes, Council Special Session 3
Barbara Smith, 13600 N. Como Drive. Mrs. Smith stated that if the developers have not
filed the proper paperwork with Pima County before they start building, she will file a
complaint. She asked that this comment apply to each translational zoning listed on this
evening's agenda.
Mayor Loomis closed the public hearing.
Council Member LaSala MOVED to approve Ordinance No. (0)99-25, OV9-99-52
translating zoning of Parcel#224-39-0020,the Future Arizona Inc. Property, from Pima
County SR to Oro Valley R 1-144 and all applicable development standards of the R 1-144
zoning district with the conditions listed in (0)99-25. MOTION SECONDED by Mayor
Loomis. MOTION carried 2— 1 with Council Member Bryant opposed.
3. PUBLIC HEARING—ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-26 OV9-99-110 PARCEL#224-
11-0480 WHEELER PROPERTY,TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA
COUNTY CR-1 TO ORO VALLEY R1-20 (LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST
CORNER OF SHANNON ROAD AND NARANJA DRIVE
Don Chatfield, Community Development Director stated that it is recommended that this
property be translated to R1-36 instead of RI-20.
Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. There being no additional comments, the
public hearing was closed.
Council Member La Sala MOVED to approve Ordinance No. (0)99-26, OV9-99-110,
translating zoning of Parcel #224-11-0480,the Wheeler property, from Pima County CR-
1 to Oro Valley R1-36, and all applicable development standards of the R1-36 zoning
district,with the conditions listed in(0)99-26. MOTION SECONDED by Mayor
Loomis. MOTION carried 2— 1 with Council Member Bryant opposed.
4. PUBLIC HEARING—ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-27 OV9-99-106 PARCEL #224-
11-046E SMITH PROPERTY,TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA
COUNTY SR TO ORO VALLEY R1-144,WITH ADDITIONAL HORSE
ENTITLEMENTS (LOCATED EAST OF SHANNON ROAD AND NORTH
NARANJA DRIVE
Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. There being no additional comments,the
public hearing was closed.
A MOTION was made by Council Member LaSala to approve Ordinance No. (0)99-27,
OV9-99-106, translating zoning of Parcel #224-11-046E, the Smith property, from Pima
County SR to Oro Valley RI-144, all applicable development standards of the R 1-144
zoning district, with the conditions listed in(0)99-27. MOTION SECONDED by Mayor
Loomis. MOTION carried 2— 1 with Council Member Bryant opposed.
04-12-99 Minutes, Council Special Session 4
5. PUBLIC HEARING—ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-28 OV9-99-5 & OV9-99-6 TLC
INVESTMENT GROUP PROPERTIES,LA CHOLLA/TANGERINE MAP,
TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY SR TO ORO VALLEY R1-
144
Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. There being no additional comments, the
public hearing was closed.
Council Member LaSala MOVED to approve Ordinance No. (0)99-28 for parcel #219-
46-0200 in the area known as La Cholla/Tangerine, from Pima County SR to Oro Valley
R1-144 and all applicable developments standards of the R1-144 zoning district.
MOTION SECONDED by Mayor Loomis. MOTION carried 2— 1 with Council
Member Bryant opposed.
6. PUBLIC HEARING—ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-29 OV9-99-53 & OV9-99-109,
MAP 2,TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY SR TO ORO
VALLEY R1-144
Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. There being no additional comments, the
public hearing was closed.
Council Member LaSala MOVED to approve Ordinance No. (0)99-29 translating zoning
from Pima County SR to Oro Valley R1-144 and all applicable development standards of
the R1-144 zoning district, excluding the 3 public school parcels and public school
entitlements. MOTION SECONDED by Mayor Loomis. MOTION carried 2— 1 with
Council Member Bryant opposed.
7. PUBLIC HEARING—ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-30 OV9-99-107 AND OV9-99-
108 PARCEL#224-11-046B AND#224-11-046C STENSTROM PROPERTIES,
AND OV9-99-95 PARCEL#224-11-0500 COFFINGER PROPERTY,
TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY SR TO ORO VALLEY R1-
144,WITH ADDITIONAL HORSE ENTITLEMENTS (LOCATED EAST OF
SHANNON ROAD,AND NORTH OF NARANJA DRIVE)
Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. There being no additional comments, the
public hearing was closed.
Council Member LaSala MOVED to approve Ordinance No. (0)99-30, OV9-99-107 and
OV9-99-108,translating zoning of Parcel#224-11-046B and#224-11-046C,the
Stenstrom properties, and OV9-99-95,translating zoning of Parcel#224-11-0500,the
Coffinger properties, from Pima County SR to Oro Valley R1-144 and all applicable
development standards of the R1-144 zoning district, with the conditions listed in(0)99-
30, general plan does support the equestrian lifestyle which retains the character of the
town. MOTION SECONDED by Mayor Loomis. In response to a question by Mayor
Loomis, Dr. Chatfield replied that in Oro Valley R1-144 it allows for 1 horse for 30,000
04-12-99 Minutes, Council Special Session 5
square feet. In Pima County SR it allows for I horse per 10,000 square feet. MOTION
carried 2— 1 with Council Member Bryant opposed.
8. PUBLIC HEARING—ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-31 OV9-99-74, OV9-99-75 &
0V9-99-103 PARCELS 224-11-0300,224-11-0310 & 224-21-0010
AMPHITHEATER PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPERTIES,
TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY SR TO ORO VALLEY R1-
144,WITH PUBLIC SCHOOL ENTITLEMENTS (LOCATED WEST OF VISTA
DEL SOL,NORTH OF GLOVER ROAD AND SOUTH OF TANGERINE ROAD)
Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. There being no additional comments, the
public hearing was closed.
Council Member LaSala MOVED to approve Ordinance No. (0)99-31, OV9-99-74,
OV9-99-75 and OV9-99-103,translating zoning of parcels#224-11-0300, #224-11-0310
and#224-21-0010,the Amphitheater Public School District properties, from Pima
County SR to Oro Valley R 1-144, all applicable development standards of the R 1-144
zoning district, and public school entitlements stated in (0)99-31. MOTION
SECONDED by Mayor Loomis. MOTION carried 2— 1 with Council Member Bryant
opposed.
9. PUBLIC HEARING —ORDINANCE NO. (0)99-32 OV9-99-67 & OV9-99-68, H.
BRAUN AND O.R.BRAUN PROPERTY—MAP 2 TRANSLATION OF ZONING
FROM PIMA COUNTY SR TO ORO VALLEY R1-144 WITH CHURCH AND
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ENTITLEMENTS
Discussion followed regarding the proposed uses for this property.
Council Member LaSala requested an opinion from the Town Attorney regarding county
entitlements carrying over to Oro Valley during the translational zoning process.
Town Attorney Dudley read the statutory requirement for translational zoning and stated
he would like to research the underlying due process concerns.
Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing.
Barbara Smith, 13600 N. Como Drive. Mrs. Smith stated that this property is directly in
the flight path of the La Cholla Air Park.
Louie Benson,2590 W. Tortolita. Mr. Benson stated this property is in the territory of
Tortolita and he doesn't understand why Oro Valley continues to annex into Tortolita.
He stated he prefers open space and asked no action be taken within the territory of
Tortolita.
Hector Conde, 14040 N. Lobelia. Mr. Conde stated based on his research of the statutes
when a developer translates from county to town zoning, he loses those entitlements.
04-12-99 Minutes, Council Special Session 6
Mayor Loomis closed the public hearing.
MOTION: Council Member LaSala MOVED to continue this item to May 5, 1999
and direct staff to check into the flight pattern of the airport and direct legal staff to look
into issues discussed tonight. MOTION seconded by Mayor Loomis. MOTION carried
3 --0.
10.PUBLIC HEARING—THE HALLAQ PROPERTIES FROM PIMA COUNTY
CB-1, TR AND CR-2 TO ORO VALLEY C-1,R-6 AND R1-10 (LOCATED AT
THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LAMBERT LANE AND LA CHOLLA
BOULEVARD
Dr. Chatfield requested a continuance of this item until such time as the Planning &
Zoning Commission has heard this item and made a recommendation.
Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. There being no additional comments, the
public hearing was closed.
MOTION: Council Member LaSala moved to continue OV9-99-51, translating zoning of
Parcel #224-24-0120 and Parcel #224-24-0130,the Hallaq properties, from Pima County
CB-1, TR,and CR-2 to Oro Valley C-1, R-6 and R 1-10. MOTION seconded by Council
Member Bryant. MOTION carried 3 —0.
ADJOURNMENT
Council Member LaSala MOVED to adjourn the meeting at 8:30 p.m. MOTION
seconded by Council Member Bryant. MOTION carried 3—0.
Respectfully submitted,
ktFvc, ec4,41-4 .
Kathryn E. Cuvelier, CMC
Town Clerk
I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the meeting of
the Town Council of Oro Valley, Arizona held on the 12th day of April 1999. I further
certify that the meeting was duly called and held and that a quorum was present.
Dated this 26th day of April 1999.
Kathryn E. Cuvelier, CMC
Town Clerk
APR :; 1999
Tucson, AZ 85742
31 March 1999
Mr. Bryant Nodine
Planning and Zoning Administrator
11000 N. La Canada Dr
Oro Valley, AZ 85737
Dear Mr. Nodine:
Several weeks ago I attended a meeting with Ms Valerie Feuer to discuss the affects of
the possible annexation of my property into the town of Oro Valley. I own two 3.3 acre
lots, side by side, at and Shannon Rd. Should this annexation occur, I
need to request an exemption to the Oro Valley zoning standards for large animals and
instead obtain the authority to continue application of the current county standard. We
breed and raise horses on this property under the provisions of the county standard which
allows one horse per ten thousand square feet.
Sincerely,
Ronald L. tenstrom