The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutOV130725 \P,LLE.4Y AR/� Q2 02 OLLLJ\WEfl .,,,,,, .,,,,_57 ,„, ,,,,,, *,:,,,,,r, .t,, AUG 3 0 2007 °UNDEQ.\°1„, Planning &Zoning Division 11000 N. La Canada Drive, Oro Valley AZ 85 37 Phone: (520)229-4800 Fax: (520)742-10•e Town of Oro Valley eY APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROJECT ARCHITECTURE Li(lf3 -07-2 S DATE: £kLW LIOV `CASE NO.: Cc` . (office use only) i ) SUBDIVISION C 11� ---NIR- LOCATION/ADDRESS:PROJECT NAME • G�, _ .LOT#it..,/ 1 ti, btf50 V � D , - to s w , v%s-oS. ,cam(u r�s t/ 61 lr' A -iC- - ER: 1 ' l /tIi'it- LOTSIZEZONING � 1 . PARCELNUMB �P,a � }'�?G�x� f ►G 7 -1/\ MODEL NAMES OR NUMBERS462-- anTaata ..,...:w+?M°0 yyyw.::;:..:,e;oro»"w:.:..- ". _ :�::.«�°`'�;.nali8�h�.. °w:.emx,msD��Ov�r.,i '."^..� a,,.ADO"w:n:,.eel"��.«.::;ieN�'roK.mx.»+?P,4�`�xM+rt?roc'x>:»e `°°aa,..,edy<„rY�i4�'w..�m�°�-�➢.mi?R�0"°".>s,:ari�t.:,.,�A��,.,:.-Ae?r�w.;,,aii@.»:;:.: .. 1 YUL; , WLLAJ!L - ADDRESS:APPLICANT: � .� r.�l�1/1) V V - ryw 6 • 1 eit IM FAX NO.: ( ô) T4L 4?, PHONE NO.: ( 16) 74Ci74 v4*- - ,-,,, PROPERTY OWNER. �,i � � ADDRESS: 1.: L L l6inj'L C &L ( PHONE NO.: FAX NO: ... .:...YOY:..;.w�pywer• '. ... :...x<:.�.i Ab...:....:lttob...::T9e' .::o`m: .:. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD HEARING DATE: I ii -v 7 SIGNATURE: ,-� ,, , DATE: d 2009 .L , �Submittal Requirements: Fees Twenty-Eight copies of the following: Color chips of body,trim and roof tiles(81/2"by 11"format)Commercial and Residential • Applications will not be accepted without all required materials. • PLEASE COLATE AND FOLD SUBMITTAL SaIOS >a..................�y�.J vw�_r—uKtST..PL...............�z4r....,..........................._.. N. i 1083 • 1277 �Q �� 0 I1247, [--'Z - _ ,1168 / I I, 1160 �i • 2 1296 �� 107E0 Z 972 96s 964 1• �� 1152 9b� • - 1276 1144cf) 996 9088 2 • / : 'P PL - 1004 P�1N 1151 136 10281020 1012 `.��pR 971i ' 1036SQV �` • • 1,28 1044 W` to M� 987 •,,- 13884 1295 1275 138841,41 �/ �cS 13868 1003 995Q 13878 108 1011'P 1104 1092 z/'\ 1033 1019 13874 • 13873 � 13856 '�� :1:2,0 I1386613861 W Trri- p 1027q 13864 � 990 982 13861 13851� �3844 1 �� 13852 A 13854 �� -- Z 13854 \ • \ 13852 13853 13849 'p z 13832 l� 0' 13832 1382 r 13840 13843 � ��' 997 \ 13820 OS, 989 981 Z 13844 • 13841 ,13 13837 m 13831 1015 Oy/ (,� 13830 Q 13828 \ �h'� 70 13834 _ 13829 382 �p 13819 ,q4,OS, --_fmfl �" 13816 ��, Z • 13812 \ 138i8 13813 13807 73 • 13817 13804 1005 13806 13so1 W MULLIGAN DR Cr 13805 - 1009 ~ 3800 (jQ`NO 1077 1065 1053 1041 1025 101 7,I 1013 13793 M��'` 1101 1089 • • 1276 1125 1113 1246• 13781 Z • 1137 O �________` N 13764 13769 m1149 • 2 1273 13765 m 13756 �,`, 13744 ;-�`�. 13761 • • 13742 13735 -7, 4V . . \13736z- • 118 13727 • 4 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY STAFF REPORT TO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING DATE: September 11, 2007 TO: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD FROM: Manny Lizarraga, Planning Intern SUBJECT: OV13-07-25, Lewis Management Resources, representing the Board of Fairfield at Rancho Vistoso, requests approval for a revised color palette for Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 10-11, parcels A and F located approximately a mile north from the intersection of W. Moore Road and N. La Canada Drive. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF APPLICATION: Nature of Application: Architecture review is required in order to ensure compliance with all applicable General Plan policies, Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised requirements, and the Design Guidelines. All architecture submittals are subject to review by the Development Review Board (DRB) per OVZCR Section 22.6.A.2. DRB approval constitutes authorization for the applicant to proceed with the building plan review process. The Building Safety and Zoning Divisions ensure compliance with all applicable Town-adopted building codes and conditions of the approved architecture. Current Site Conditions: The subdivision has no undeveloped parcels. The subdivision area is 17.44 acres. The subdivision consists of 68 lots. The color palette is of a greenish hue. Proposed Improvements: The applicant is proposing updating and revising the neighborhood's color schemes to blend in with the more contemporary surrounding schemes while providing more of a natural earth tone. The previously approved colors were more of a green hue and the proposed is now incorporating more browns and tans. BACKGROUND: Approvals to date: In 1999,the Architectural Elevations for Fairfield at Rancho Vistoso were approved. Surrounding Land Uses: Direction Zoning Land Use Stone Canyon II and North Rancho Vistoso North: PAD Neighborhood 11 (5 8-13 3) South: PAD Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 11 (1-360) East: PAD Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 11 AG(1-42) Stone Canyon II and North Rancho Vistoso West: PAD Neighborhood 11 (5 8-13 3) , TOWN OF ORO VALLEY STAFF REPORT TO THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD, OV13-07-25 Page 2 of 3 ANALYSIS OF OVZCR SECTION 22.6.B-DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CRITERIA: "In considering any application for development review, the Development Review Board shall be guided"by a specific list of criteria when deliberating(see Section 22.6.B, OVZCR). The following is a list of noteworthy criteria (in italics) followed by staff commentary: 1. The Development Review Board shall examine the application to insure that all provisions of this Code and all other codes,master plans, general plans and standards of the Town shall be complied with where applicable. A. GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE In particular, the following policy applies, Policy 2.1.6: "All sides of buildings may impact their surroundings and shall be coherently designed and treated. " All sides of the proposed improvement are consistently designed to evoke coherent visual interest with the surrounding developments. This has been previously evaluated as part of the Architectural approval. B. RANCHO VISTOSO PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT The proposal is in general conformance with the standards of PAD. C. OVZCR COMPLIANCE The architecture is in general conformance with applicable OVZCR requirements. Chapter 22.6.B.6, "The character of the proposed design shall be in harmony with, and compatible to, those structures in the neighboring environment and the design character adopted for any given area avoiding excessive variety or monotonous repetition. " The colors proposed are in harmony and compatible with the neighboring structures, avoiding excessive variety and monotonous repetition. Chapter 22.6.B.10, "All exterior materials and colors including roofs, walls and fences shall be predominantly muted earth and plant tones and shall minimize contrast and glare. " The colors proposed for this project meet this requirement. The colors are muted earth tones comprised of greens, tans and brown shades. Addendum A Design Guidelines: Design Guidelines C.2.e.iii: "Compatibility and visual coherence is desired... " The proposed color is actually more compatible to the surrounding neighborhood structures and future developments. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY STAFF REPORT TO THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD, OV13-07-25 Page 3 of 3 Design Guidelines C.2.f: "Substantial earth- tone material should be used. " The proposed colors are earth-toned consisting of shades of brown,tan, and green. SUMMARY OF FACTORS: Findings in Favor: 1. The proposed colors meet the intent of all applicable General Plan policies and OVZCR requirements, as well as the OVZCR Design Guidelines. 2. The proposed colors are complimentary to the neighboring architectural developments of the area in terms of architectural style and proposed color palette. Findings Against: 1. None. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the proposed color revisions request with no conditions, finding that the proposal meets the intent of all applicable General Plan policies, OVZCR requirements, and OVZCR Design Guidelines. SUGGESTED MOTIONS: The DRB may wish to consider one of the following suggested motions: I move to [approve, approve with conditions, OR deny], OV13-07-25, Lewis Management Resources, requests approval of revised color palette for the existing subdivision. Attachments: 1. Proposed color scheme and previously approved colors. 2. Site plan. CC: TOV: Shirley Gay Applicant: Lewis Management Resources Fax: 520.742.1523 JPA,LEY qRi� OHO O4/ TOWN OF ORO VALLEY P. PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT 11000 N.La Canada Drive, Oro Valley,AZ 85737 (520)229-4800•Fax(520) 742-1022 UNDED September 27, 2007 Lewis Management 180 W. Magee Road, Suite 134 Tucson,AZ 85741 520.742.5674 Fax: 520.742.1523 RE: Continued Item: OV13-07-25, Lewis Management Resources, representing the Board of Fairfield at Rancho Vistoso, requests approval for a revised color palette for Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 10-11, parcels A and F located approximately a mile north from the intersection of W. Moore Road and N. La Canada Drive. Dear Applicant, At their special meeting held September 26, 2007,the Development Review Board voted 5-0 to approve this project with the condition of excluding the colors not approved by the HOA from the color palette. The colors schemes "Meadow Trail" / "Herbal Wash" and"Artifact"! "Burlap" are to be removed. If you have any questions, please contact me. We look forward to the successful completion of this project. Sincerely, Manny Q. Lizarraga Planning Department 520.229.4814 mlizarraga Cad orovalley.net CC: Shirley Gay F:\OV\OV13\2007\13-07-25\Correspondence\DRB follow OV 13-07- 18.continued.done.doc www.townoforoval ley.com TOWN OF ORO VALLEY STAFF REPORT TO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING DATE: September 26, 2007 TO: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD FROM: Manny Lizarraga, Planning Intern SUBJECT: Continued Item: OV13-07-25, Lewis Management Resources, representing the Board of Fairfield at Rancho Vistoso, requests approval for a revised color palette for Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 10-11, parcels A and F located approximately a mile north from the intersection of W. Moore Road and N. La Canada Drive. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF APPLICATION: Nature of Application: Architecture review is required in order to ensure compliance with all applicable General Plan policies, Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised requirements, and the Design Guidelines. All architecture submittals are subject to review by the Development Review Board (DRB) per OVZCR Section 22.6.A.2. DRB approval constitutes authorization for the applicant to proceed with the building plan review process. The Building Safety and Zoning Divisions ensure compliance with all applicable Town-adopted building codes and conditions of the approved architecture. Current Site Conditions: The subdivision has no undeveloped parcels. The subdivision area is 17.44 acres. The subdivision consists of 68 lots. The color palette is of a greenish hue. Proposed Improvements: The applicant is proposing updating and revising the neighborhood's color schemes to blend in with the more contemporary surrounding schemes while providing more of a natural earth tone. The previously approved colors were more of a green hue and the proposed is now incorporating more browns and tans. Development Review Board Action: At their regular meeting held September 11, 2007, the Development Review Board voted to continue this item based on the Board's decision that the item was not within their purview and wanted further clarification. BACKGROUND: Approvals to date: In 1999,the Architectural Elevations for Fairfield at Rancho Vistoso were approved. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY STAFF REPORT TO THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD, OV13-07-25 Page 2 of 3 Surrounding Land Uses: Direction Zoning Land Use North: PADStone Canyon II and North Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 11 (58-133) South: PAD Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 11 (1-360) East: PAD Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 11 AG(1-42) West: PADStone Canyon II and North Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 11 (5 8-13 3) ANALYSIS OF OVZCR SECTION 22.6.B-DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CRITERIA: "In considering any application for development review, the Development Review Board shall be guided"by a specific list of criteria when deliberating(see Section 22.6.B, OVZCR). The following is a list of noteworthy criteria (in italics) followed by staff commentary: 1. The Development Review Board shall examine the application to insure that all provisions of this Code and all other codes, master plans, general plans and standards of the Town shall be complied with where applicable. A. GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE In particular, the following policy applies, Policy 2.1.6: "All sides of buildings may impact their surroundings and shall be coherently designed and treated. " All sides of the proposed improvement are consistently designed to evoke coherent visual interest with the surrounding developments. This has been previously evaluated as part of the Architectural approval. B. RANCHO VISTOSO PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT The proposal is in general conformance with the standards of PAD. C. OVZCR COMPLIANCE The architecture is in general conformance with applicable OVZCR requirements. Chapter 22.6.B.6, "The character of the proposed design shall be in harmony with, and compatible to, those structures in the neighboring environment and the design character adopted for any given area avoiding excessive variety or monotonous repetition. " The colors proposed are in harmony and compatible with the neighboring structures, avoiding excessive variety and monotonous repetition. Chapter 22.6.B.10, "All exterior materials and colors including roofs, walls and fences shall be predominantly muted earth and plant tones and shall minimize contrast and glare. " TOWN OF ORO VALLEY STAFF REPORT TO THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD, OV13-07-25 Page 3 of 3 The colors proposed for this project meet this requirement. The colors are muted earth tones comprised of greens, tans and brown shades. Addendum A Design Guidelines: Design Guidelines C.2.e.iii: "Compatibility and visual coherence is desired... " The proposed color is actually more compatible to the surrounding neighborhood structures and future developments. Design Guidelines C.2.f: "Substantial earth-tone material should be used." The proposed colors are earth-toned consisting of shades of brown,tan, and green. SUMMARY OF FACTORS: Findings in Favor: 1. The proposed colors meet the intent of all applicable General Plan policies and OVZCR requirements, as well as the OVZCR Design Guidelines. 2. The proposed colors are complimentary to the neighboring architectural developments of the area in terms of architectural style and proposed color palette. Findings Against: 1. None. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the proposed color revisions request with no conditions, finding that the proposal meets the intent of all applicable General Plan policies, OVZCR requirements, and OVZCR Design Guidelines. SUGGESTED MOTIONS: The DRB may wish to consider one of the following suggested motions: I move to [approve, approve with conditions, OR deny], OV13-07-25, Lewis Management Resources, requests approval of revised color palette for the existing subdivision. Attachments: None. CC: TOV: Shirley Gay Applicant: Lewis Management Resources Fax: 520.742.1523 4c.ilml, Coto,€ 1 C '► The Board of Fairfield Rancho Vistoso appointed four residents to review our current paint palette and to recommend new colors and any changes that should be made. The Committee members are: Lynne Wiedebush, Chairperson Marsha Thrall, Board Representative t.. Isabelle Hendricks Alice Homstad Fairfield Rancho Vistoso was developed in the late 90's and the color palette reflects that era. The committee felt it was time to upgrade and enhance our colors to meet the new standards of Oro Valley and bring us into the year 2007 and beyond. The committee spent many hours looking at paint palettes and touring Oro Valley to identify homes with desert colors that were current and appealing. There were ap- proximately 24 colors chosen and then Thia Cross Design was consulted to review and recommend 10 base colors plus trims that would be compatible and would upgrade our community. Each of these colors comply with the LRV values of Oro Valley. It is recommended that all the houses be painted with the base color plus the identified trim. The garage doors would be the base color with the facia and indent walls being the trim. Our recommendation to the board is to have only one trim color, as identified with each base. The existing colors will be eliminated when each house is painted as they are no longer in the current paint palettes. It is also recommended that no two adjacent houses have the same color. These colors may also be computer matched by any paint company the resident may choose. The color codes are: AF'PROVE p BY: TC/P RpQA SW=Sherwin Williams f,, ATE DE=Dunn Edwards Pz PRO CT M 'L-- FZ=Frazee Thank you for this opportunity and your consideration of our recommendations. ----k-671.T1777:-.7.7-‘, t' 3 0 2007 of Town ' 0 valley:F r t s Fairfield at Rancho Vistoso Paint Pallet Proposed Paint Pallet Established 2007 Body Body Trim Trim SW 6123—Baguette SW 7737—Meadow Trail SW 6122—Camelback SW 7739—Herbal Wash Ill 4010.1 SW 6138—Artifact I DEC 707—Foxtail I SW 6137—Burlap DE 5214—Tawny Amber SW 6124—Cardboard —Saddle Brown SW 6123—Baguette A 5.U. SW 6131—Chamois FZ 8255—Jamocha SW 6130 Mannered Gold FZ 8254—Cinnamon Spice IIII SW 6117—Smokey Topaz Tucson Clay SW 6116—Tatami Tan rZ 8�'6` -6 Sefie .hade r2- F, 3 - , E:.R F/c,6 Fairfield at Rancho Vistoso Paint Pallet Last Revision 03/05/1999 Trim Trim Walnut Wash Rockbridge Body Body Bark Mulch Strafford Brown Wild Country Barn Rafter Akifr 4 � Gig 3 Trim Trim Cornico Beige Tram Gray Body Body Tomorrows Taupe Seal Beach • Grey Lock Manufacturer—Frazee Paint H30 BODY n TRIM AV 8734M Bark Mulch -IIMMilrilll] 8735D Wild Country H27 4IN, M BODY 1 Joilii TRIM 1 8704D Stratford Brown O 8705D Barn Rafter . -• a) 6 1 T BODYF , ,,,N, TRIM V QJ A 8754D Tomorrow's Taupe ` I H21 BODY -__ TRIM 8644M V Seal Beach I 8645D Greylock