Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOV1501146 \ _.(S...ist ki..),.: .. o4P�Y AA% TOWN OF ORO VALLEY � DEVELOPMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES DEPARTMENT i �� IJ11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE, ORO VALLEY, AZ. 85737 y4- PHONE: (520) 229-4800 FAX: (520) 742-1022 www.orovalleyaz.gov/dis °UNDED A91a 1.2 GENERAL APPLICATION FORM Office Use Only OV Case #: Application Type: ;.r ❑ Major General Plan Amendment CI Final Plat c.t• `� x. R . CIRezoning/PAD Amendment Cl Pre-Application `W AUG 01 `T ❑ Planned Area Development ❑ Zoning Verification 1 Cl Conditional Use Permit Cl Sign Criteria ,� CI Zoning Code Amendment ❑ Sign - PAD Exemption B : '' Conceptual Site Plan ❑ Master Sign Program ❑ Conceptual Public Art Cl Communication Facility—Tier 1 and 2 Minor ❑ Conceptual Architecture ❑ Communication Facility—Major ❑ Final Site Plan ❑ Revised Development Plan ❑ Conceptual Landscape Plan ❑ Other Subject Property Information: Address: Enclave at Stone Canyon - Block 1 Parcel/Tax Code: 219-19-9050 Subdivision/Commercial Center Name: Enclave at Stone Canyon Book/Page or Sequence Number: 20143040306 Lot Number(s) Block 1 Legal Description: THE ENCLAVE AT STONE CANYON V SQ2 014 3 04 0 3 0 6 COMMON AREAS B C & D OPEN S PACE Cr ' Section/Township/Range: S23, T11, R13E Area of Property /, s-9 Existing Land Use: Vacant - Unsubdivided Proposed Land Use: Residential 2„�5 a pe r,44y . Applicant Information: * If more than one, attach list Applicant *: Name: Matt Stuart Firm: Cypress Civil Development Address:2102 N Country Club, -49 City: Tucson State: AZ Zip: 85716 Telephone: 520-505-1023 Fax: Email: mstuart@cypresscivil.com Property Owner(s) if different from Applicant *: Name: Terry Klipp Firm: Terramar Properties Inc. Address: 2200 E River Road, Suite 105 City: Tucson. State: AZ Zip: 85718 Telephone: 520-577-7800 Fax: Email: tklipp@terramarproperties.com Consultant*: (Discipline) Name: Firm: Address: City: State: Zip: Telephone: Fax: Email: 6 Project Description/Narrative: Proposing to develop Block 1 of the Enclave at Stone Canyon residential subdivision. Proposing to develop 32 detached single-family lots. I hereby certify that I have read and examined this application and know the same to be true and correct. I am the owner of the property or the Owner's authorized representative, and if not the owner, I have obtained the owner's permission to perform stated work. All provisions of laws and ordinances governing this type of work will be complied with whether specified herein or not. The approval of this application does not presume to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of any other federal, state or local law for which this project may be subject to. Notice: It is the applicant/owner's responsibility to ensure all private rules and regulations (such as Covenants, Conditions & Restrictions (CC&R's)) of the subdivision and/or commercial center are adhered to. Contact your Home Owners Association or property management to determine applicable requirements. It is also the applicant's responsibility to coordinate with all outside agencies to secure their acceptance or clearance. Failure to do so may delay issuance of permits. See attached list of agencies. ;e______ - Matt Stuart 07/30/2015 Applicant's Signature Print Name Date Important Note: All submittals received after 4:00 p.m. will be processed the next day Submittals will be rejected if: • Not folded using Pima County fold &collated; • There are missing items on the checklist unless otherwise approved by Planning Division Manager or Town Engineer. • Re-submittals cannot be accepted without a transmittal and a written narrative summary describing the purpose of submittal. 7 1.3 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW PACKAGE - SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: All submittal requirements are included herein. Please note additional site specific information may be required. ' , Fees (Refer to the Section 1A Fee Schedule of this process guide) • Traffic Impact Analysis (4 copies) • Alternative Parking Analysis (if applicable) (2 copies) ve P• ublic Outreach Report (see Section 1.4 of this process guide) (2 copies) vre N• arrative providing a brief description and overview of project (10 copies) te Letter of Authorization from property owner(s) (2 copies) All items included in Section 2.0 and Section 3.0 Submittal Type ❑ Full CDRB Conceptual Design Package: u Written response to Pre-Application Comment Letter (6 copies) ❑ Conceptual Site Plan — Size 24"x36" (10 copies) ❑ Conceptual Model Home Architecture — Size 11"x17" or 24"x36" (4 copies) Li Conceptual Landscape Plan — Size 24"x36" (10 copies) u Native Plant Preservation, Salvage and Mitigation Plan — Size 24"x36" (2 copies) u Site Resource Inventory— Size 24"x36" (2 copies) ❑ Preliminary Traffic Impact Statement (2 copies) ❑ Offsite Drainage Conveyance Letter by downstream property owner (2 copies) te Individual Plan Submittals: v. Conceptual Site Plan — Size 24"x36" (10 copies) Li Conceptual Model Home Architecture Plan — Size 24"x36" (4 copies) The following will require additional fees. Please contact the agencies below for additional information. Li Pima County Wastewater Management - (520) 740-6609 LI Pima County Addressing — (520) 740-6586 Li Arizona State Museum (See Section 3.2 of this process guide) — (520) 621-6320 U Pima County Department of Environmental Quality — (520) 740-3340 U Signed notification of potential state or federal issues (see Section 3.1 of this process guide) 8 OQON%EY'AR/20�9 j °VNDED A9 Development and Infrastructure Services July 14, 2015 Matt Stuart Cypress Civil Development 2102 N Country Club Road #9 Tucson, AZ 85716 Re: OV1500757, Pre-Application Letter fora proposed SFR Development in Stone Canyon — Enclave at Stone Canyon V— Block 1 The Town of Oro Valley Permitting Division offers the Engineering comments listed below. Note: these comments are preliminary in nature and subject to change upon receipt of more detailed information. These comments are for guidance and are not a substitute for all applicable Town of Oro Valley, Pima County, State of Arizona and Federal codes, regulations, ordinances and/or laws. Please provide the following information with the Conceptual Site Plan submittal: n A copy of this TOV engineering comment letter ❑ A comment response letter ❑ Sewer design information The following comments are to be addressed and are meant to protect the public's health, safety, and general welfare: 1. CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW Conceptual design review is required for this project in accordance with Town of Oro Valley Zoning Code Section 22.9.D. The conceptual design review stage includes submittal, review, and approval of a conceptual site plan. A conceptual design review checklist is available which provides minimum standards for the preparation of the conceptual design review package. The conceptual design review package is reviewed by staff and presented before the Conceptual Design Review Board (CDRB) and Town Council for approval. 2. FINAL DESIGN REVIEW Final design review is required for this project in accordance with Town of Oro Valley Zoning Code Section 22.9.E. Final design review includes the review and approval of the final design construction package which consists of the following: a. Final Site Plan and associated reports based on the approved Conceptual Site Plan. b. Civil Improvement Plans for proposed roadways, infrastructure, and grading. c. Native plant preservation, salvage and mitigation plans. d. Landscape, irrigation, buffer yard, and water harvesting plans. The final design review components that are reviewed by engineering are described in further detail below. 2.1 DRAINAGE A professional Civil Engineer registered in the state of Arizona will be required to prepare a drainage report that conforms to the Town's Drainage Criteria Manual (2010 Edition). A scoping meeting can be arranged with The Town of Oro Valley prior to preparing the drainage report if the engineer desires. The drainage report shall address the following: a. The Town does not allow stormwater retention; provide detention instead. Detained stormwater shall be released at pre-development rates and flow conditions. b. Provide detention routing. c. Detention volume may be reduced at a 1:1 volumetric ratio utilized for water harvesting. The volumetric ratio must be confirmed for the 2-, 10, 25- and 100-year storm events. d. Show the drainage concept on the Conceptual Site Plan for this planned development. This includes showing on-site watershed boundaries, high points, and flow arrows. e. Show all points where off-site drainage enters the site. f. For each drainage course entering the development, the 100-year frequency flow must be shown for pre-developed conditions. For each drainage course leaving the development, the 100-year frequency flow must be shown for pre- and post-developed conditions. g. Drainage must be collected and released from the proposed subdivision at the locations and in the manner indicated by the original topography. h. The 100-year frequency flows at points of discharge (concentration points) must be shown. i. If drainage is to be disturbed outside the boundaries of the subdivision, arrangements must be made with adjacent owners and documentation submitted. j. Standing water utilized for water harvesting purposes shall be limited to a maximum depth of 4" and must infiltrate or dissipate within 12 hours of initial ponding. k. Delineate any regulatory flood plains. I. Show off-site drainage improvements that might be affected or required by this project. m. Lot to lot drainage is discouraged. When necessary, proper drainage channels and easements must be specified on the plat. S:\PERMPLUS\DOCS\OV1500757 Pre-app SC Enclave\Comments\Engineering\eng-preap- 2 20150714.doc n. A minimum of one all weather crossing shall be provided to all areas of the proposed subdivision. o. Delineate any regulatory floodplains and erosion hazard setback lines. p. Show existing or required off-site drainage improvements that may be affected or required by this project. 2.2 SOILS A geotechnical soils report shall be prepared containing all geotechnical engineering information and recommendations applicable to this project. The minimum geotechnical information to be included in the report is as follows: a. Soil stability of all proposed cut and fill slopes. b. Angle of shear and maximum recommended slope ratio of all proposed cuts or fill. c. Recommended compaction treatment of all fill areas. d. Erosion vulnerability of all graded areas and created slopes. e. Stormwater siltation potential of soils for all graded areas and created slopes. f. Description of soil constraints on the structural design of all foundations, footings, and walls. g. Identification of any potentially hazardous geotechnical areas where construction is proposed. h. Recommended treatment for stability, erosion, and siltation control of all newly graded areas and created slopes. i. Determination of a pavement design section for driveways, parking areas, trash enclosures, etc. j. Provide a recommended slope over a given distance for drainage of unpaved surfaces away from building pads. k. Foundation design recommendations. 2.3 TRAFFIC A traffic impact analysis will not be required for this project. 2.4 LANDSCAPING The landscape plan for this project will be reviewed to ensure that there is coordination between the Landscape Architect and the Engineer preparing the various design documents. The following landscape items will be verified during the engineering review: a. Show complete and clearly defined Sight Visibility Triangles (SVT's). Section 4.8 of the Town of Oro Valley Subdivision Street Standards explains limitations to improvements within the triangles. b. Landscape Plans must show and clearly delineate all existing and proposed underground utilities, drainage structures, and easements as depicted on the final design drawings for determination of planting clearances and conflicts. S:\PERMPLUS\DOCS\OV1500757 Pre-app SC Enclave\Comments\Engineering\eng-preap- 3 20150714.doc 2.5 RAINWATER HARVESTING PLANS A Rainwater Harvesting Plan is required for this project. The Rainwater Harvesting Plan requires close project coordination between the Civil Engineer and the Landscape Architect and requires both to stamp the plan with their registrant seal. Please refer to the Town of Oro Valley Zoning Code, Section 27.6.D.4 and the Rainwater Harvesting Plan Checklist for additional information. 2.6 IMPROVEMENT PLANS Paving, grading, and drainage plans shall be prepared by a Civil Engineer registered in the state of Arizona. The civil improvement plans shall meet all applicable requirements of the Rancho Vistoso PAD, the Town's Zoning Code, Subdivision Street Standards, Drainage Criteria Manual, and Improvement Plan Checklist where applicable. This information can be downloaded or viewed from the Town's website. 2.7 TITLE REPORT A new Title Report is required to verify ownership and identify all easements within the subject property. Submit two legible copies of the current Title Report, updated to within 30 days of final design review submittal. Provide complete copies of the recorded dockets and pages of the easements as identified within Schedule B of the Title Report. These dockets shall include all information necessary to corroborate easements shown on final design documents (e.g. final site plan, improvement plans, landscape plans, etc). 3 GRADING A Type 2 Grading Permit will be required to construct utilities, roadways, and general site improvements for the project. Grading shall be in conformance with the Rancho Vistoso PAD and the Town of Oro Valley Grading Ordinance, Oro Valley Zoning Code (OVZC) Section 27.9 where applicable. Excavation, grading, and fill shall also be in conformance with the project's geotechnical report and the 2012 International Residential Code. 4. PROJECT ASSURANCES Site stabilization, landscaping, water infrastructure and third party trust assurances are required for residential subdivisions. The amounts of the assurances are to be approved by the Development and Infrastructure Services Department prior to the issuance of a grading permit per Chapter 26.6 of the OVZC. Assurances for stabilization, landscaping and water infrastructure shall be an amount equal to 120% of the specified improvement costs as estimated by the contractor, engineer, and/or landscape architect. The Town will provide additional information as to the specific bond requirements and procedures during the improvement plan review stage. S:\PERMPLUS\DOCS\OV1500757 Pre-app SC Enclave\Comments\Engineering\eng-preap- 4 20150714.doc Ay 5. GENERAL COMMENTS a. Provide an additional access point to Block 1 from the access drive for the Swim and Fitness Center. b. Cul-de-sac streets are limited to 600' in length unless waived by the Town Engineer if a written release is obtained from emergency services and the local school district. At a minimum, cul-de-sac turn around areas shall be spaced at a distance not greater than 600'. (Subdivision Street Standards Section 4.2) c. Please be aware that the minimum distance to be provided between a residential driveway and the end of a curb return is 20'. The pre-application submittal depicts several driveways that may be within 20' of the end of a curb return. (OV Town Code Section 7-5-5) d. Please be aware that the minimum distance between residential driveways is 12'. Also, the maximum width of a shared driveway for two adjoining properties is 30'. (OV Town Code Section 7-5-5) e. Please closely analyze the location of future driveways with respect to proposed curbed medians and traffic circles with through traffic. Ensure that safe and efficient access is provided for all proposed lots. The Town's preference is that driveways not be provided at blind spots such as those created by the proposed traffic circles with through traffic movements. f. The proposed streets will be required to meet the requirements of the Rancho Vistoso Pad and the Town's Subdivision Street Standards where applicable. g. Ensure that AASHTO SU-30 design vehicle maneuverability is provided throughout the proposed subdivision streets. (Subdivision Street Standards Sec 4.4) h. Double frontage lots are not permitted. Revise site plan as necessary. In addition, ensure that lots provide appropriate dimensions to accommodate the proposed product and allow for sufficient vehicle maneuverability within the driveway area. i. Detention provisions shall be required in accordance with the Town's Drainage Criteria Manual. j. All lots within the proposed subdivision will require verification that all- weather access has been provided. k. Analysis and encroachment analysis of the Highlands Wash will be required to establish floodplain limits, erosion hazard setbacks and minimum finish floor elevations. I. This development shall be subject to the Town of Oro Valley Floodplain Ordinance requirements and will require an issued Floodplain use Permit for any improvements within floodplain areas. i. Please note that the vertical alignment of streets shall be subject to the requirements of the Town's Subdivision Street Standards. (Subdivision Street Standards, Section 4.6) j. This development shall be subject to the International Residential Code, S:\PERMPLUS\DOCS\OV1500757 Pre-app SC Enclave\Comments\Engineering\eng-preap- 5 20150714.doc 2012 edition with local amendments. k. A Final Plat will be required per Oro Valley Zoning Code Section 22.9.F. I. Please provide verification of archeological clearance for the affected property. m.Please note that it is the applicant's responsibility to coordinate all sewer improvements directly with the Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department. n. Please note that it is the applicant's responsibility to coordinate all addressing and street name requirements directly with Pima County Addressing. This includes review and approval of the Final Site Plan and Final Plat by that agency as required. o. Please note that it is the applicant's responsibility to coordinate all dry utility improvements directly with the respective utility company (TEP, Southwest Gas, Centurylink, etc...) p. The applicant is encouraged to contact the utility companies early in the submittal process to begin coordination of all components of the project. q. It is applicant's responsibility to coordinate and obtain any necessary approvals from the Army Corps of Engineers for 404 jurisdictional watercourse, as applicable. If you have any questions, please call me at (520)229-4824. Sincerely Josh Potter, P.E. Senior Civil Engineer Attachments: cc: File S:\PERMPLUS\DOCS\OV1500757 Pre-app SC Enclave\Comments\Engineering\eng-preap- 6 20150714.doc 1<w C Gdrt, Steal- ' td ►f Ise ,oLoFR GOLDER RANCH FIRE DISTRICT „.„.„ Fire and Life Safety Division A► International Fire Code (IFC) 2012 Edition Compliance Review TO: Town of Oro Valley Development Services Building Safety Division FROM: William Loesche, Fire Marshal DATE: 07/09/15 PROJECT: Block 1 — Enclave at Stone Canyon Hohokam Village Trail, TOV TOV PERMIT #: OV1500757 REVIEW: Fire Code Compliance Review of Pre-Application Documents Review Type: First Review Received on: 07/01/15 Review Status:Comments Only Review Due Date: 07/23/15 a r,. tic • ii �-y ;s��-,.� r � - 51� ��� 4�� � � - -����.-.,� �; �� ��� •rinkler Fire Alarm -.'tip°•. Ciotti Pre-A•.lication Documents Comments Onl Deferred Submittals- Water Plan Status Current Fire Flow Status Current Fire A..aratus Acc.-Status- IFC Standard 901 Acknowled•ment Does Fire Approve of Permit Issuance-M Comments Onl The application of the above referenced project is in review for compliance with the Town of Oro Valley and Golder Ranch Fire District's Fire Codes and Standards. Section I—GRFD/TOV IFC Standard 901: [Has ndard 901"Pre-Co AcjC gwl dgment'aBeenPovided? 1.1 An applicant written response and acknowledgment to each of the items within GRFD Fire Code Standard 901 shall be provided with the Building Permit Application. The applicant completing the form shall be the owner of the property or the owner's authorized representative. The applicant's written response and acknowledgment to each item may be directly on the form or may be provided separately with references to each numbered item 1.1 through 1.17. Provide a completed Form 901 to this office. Section II— Building Application Fire Code Review Comments: 2.1 No comments Section III— MUNIS DATABASE Oro Valley Building Safety Division: Please be aware that the following fire inspections have been added for this application. MUNIS Fire Code Inspections 09026 C of 0 FIRE APPROVAL(Call 825-5959) 05290 FIRE CODE GENERAL(CALL 825-5959) Please email or call me with any questions related to any of the above Fire Code comments. William Loesche Fire Marshal Golder Ranch Fire District&Town of Oro Valley (520) 818-1017 wloesche(c�grfdaz.gov TOV: Sets of plans to be returned -0 Golder Ranch Fire District,Fire and Life Safety Division,3885 E.Golder Ranch Dr.,Tucson,Arizona 85739 Office: 520-818-1017 Fax: 520-825-5987 www.grfdaz.gov wloesche@grfdaz.gov Proudly Serving Our Community with Strong Hands&Caring Hearts Since 1977. Serving as the Fire Marshal for the Town of Oro Valley since 1999. °`DER GOLDER RANCH FIRE DISTRICT 4c, Fire and Life Safety Division '1'744CIA‘. International Fire Code (IFC) 2012 Edition Compliance Review TO: Town of Oro Valley Development Services Building Safety Division FROM: William Loesche, Fire Marshal DATE: 09/01/15 PROJECT: Enclave at Stone Canyon Block 1, TOV TOV PERMIT#: OV1501146 REVIEW: Fire Code Compliance Review of Conceptual Site Plan Documents Review Type: First Review Received on: 08/14/15 Review Status:Comments only Review Due Date: 09/09/15 Occ.Type Const.Type Area S.F171 8tris height Qcc.Load Sprinkler Fire Alarm Fire Flow Submittal Represents New Subdivision Deferred Submittals Water Plan Status Pending Current Fire Flow Status Pending Current Fire Apparatus Access Status Pending IFC Standard 901 Acknowledgment Pending Does Fire Approve of Permit Issuance? Comments only The conceptual site plan of the above referenced project is in review for compliance with the Town of Oro Valley and Golder Ranch Fire District's Fire Codes and Standards. Section I—GRFD/TOV IFC Standard 901: Has Fire Code Standard 901 "Pre-Construction Fire Code Requirements-Permit Applicant Acknowledgment"Seen Provided? 1.1 An applicant written response and acknowledgment to each of the items within GRFD Fire Code Standard 901 shall be provided with the Building Permit Application. The applicant completing the form shall be the owner of the property or the owner's authorized representative. The applicant's written response and acknowledgment to each item may be directly on the form or may be provided separately with references to each numbered item 1.1 through 1.17. Section II —Conceptual Application Fire Code Review Comments: All corrections must be made to the building application documents and new complete revised sets shall be resubmitted. All changes shall be highlighted by using clouds and deltas, noting the revision date in the title block. A written, narrative response shall be provided to each fire code compliance issue noted below. 2.1 IFC Sec. 104.2, Sec. 105.4.1, Sec. 105.4.2, Sec. 507,App. B, and App. C: The public water supply plan/documents shall include all locations of fire hydrants, water mains, valves and other appurtenances and specifications relevant to the delivery of the required fire flow. Provide a complete set of water supply documents for review. 2.2 IFC Sections 507.5 and C105.1 with Table C105.1 and Footnote(a) Fire Hydrant Systems: A distribution of fire hydrants shall be provided in accordance with these referenced code sections. Fire hydrant spacing shall be five hundred (500)feet except for dead-end streets where the spacing shall be four hundred (400)feet. No home shall be constructed more than six hundred (600)feet from a fire hydrant.,Provide proper hydrant spacing. 2.3 IFC Section B105.1 Fire-Flow Requirements for Buildings: A water plan shall be developed and submitted for review. The water plan shall include all appurtenances thereto. Fire flow shall be provided and capable of flowing at least 1000gpm for 2 hours for homes up to 3600 square feet in size. Homes larger than 3601 square feet shall provide fire-flow in accordance with IFC Table B105.1. Golder Ranch Fire District, Fire and Life Safety Division,3885 E.Golder Ranch Dr.,Tucson,Arizona 85739 Office: 520-818-1017 Fax: 520-825-5987 www.grfdaz.gov wloesche@grfdaz.gov Proudly Serving Our Community with Strong Hands&Caring Hearts Since 1977. Serving as the Fire Marshal for the Town of Oro Valley since 1999. 2.4 IFC Section 503.1 Fire Apparatus Access Roadways: Approved fire apparatus access roadways shall be provided in accordance with this section. Roadways shall be surfaced with an all-weather material capable of supporting an imposed load of 75,000pounds. Grades shall not exceed 12% for blacktop surfacing. Turning radii shall meet the requirements of SU-30. The documents submitted for permit review are in compliance with the fire code and are approved. Approval of plans and specifications shall not be construed to be a permit for, or approval of, any violation of any provisions of the Fire Code and shall not be deemed to nullify any provisions of local, state, or federal law, regulation, or code. Section III—MUNIS DATABASE Oro Valley Building Safety Division: Conceptual comments only at this time, no inspections entered Please email or call me with any questions related to any of the above Fire Code comments. William Loesche Fire Marshal Golder Ranch Fire District&Town of Oro Valley (520) 818-1017 wloesche(a�q rfdaz.qov TOV: Sets of plans to be returned -0 ` �`' /1 l 0946 t A. icqpI ORO VALLEY ' '-41;;; f? `- RESIDENTIAL CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW -~_ PROCESS GUIDE 'F-AIDED/ , a • This process guide contains the process narrative, submittal checklist, and plan content for each of the two (2) Conceptual Design Review submittal plans, including Conceptual Site Plan and Conceptual Model Home Architecture Plan. Each of these items will be reviewed by the Conceptual Design Review Board (CDRB) who will make a recommendation to the Town Council: 1.0 Conceptual Design Package 1.1 Process Narrative (Pg. 2) 1.2 Application Form (single form for Conceptual Site Plan and Conceptual Model Home Architecture Plan), (Pg. 5) 1.3 Conceptual Design Review Package Submittal Checklist (Pg. 7) 1.4 Meeting Calendar (Pg. 10) 1.5 Conceptual Design Process Flow Chart (Pg. 11) 2.0 Conceptual Site Plan Content 2.1 Plan Format (Pg. 12) 2.2 Plan Content (Pg. 13) 2.3 Required Notes (Pg. 19) 3.0 Conceptual Model Home Architecture Content 3.1 Plan Format (Pg. 23) 3.2 Plan Content (Pg. 23) Revised 7-17-12 1 ______ _,, , ., ‘,„.„..„ ,,,,, cp,.-..-,-abi,„:,.,„, 0/9 ,.,,„.„..,„.,,,,,_, A.,, ,,,,,,Aty). .aiJ y 1 .1 Process Narrative Introduction: The Development and Infrastructure Services (DIS) Department is here to assist you through the Town's Design Review process. Throughout the process, you will be working closely with the Town staff to ensure the efficient processing of your application for development. There are six Divisions within the DIS Department that will help coordinate all facets of your development. For information on a specific topic relating to your development, please refer to the attached resource list or visit the DIS Department's website at www.orovalleyDlS.com. The approval process for an application varies depending on the type of application. To better understand the approval process for the Town's Conceptual Design applications, please refer to the table below. Table of Authority 40.`z,`ir'�,_zcK �rw-C'''-� -.' -vim t�.9' F_° ,3 tF�"' %� �.'�= rl, i - , € - ��- {� .2. - ic'�-`'�'��� t' Ss>;� �-'�-�` ��:"4?,L*FL�-r-s; .zw+ 4 o r -<.tii.al< 7.,,s }, i, -ji a � Jre. + :+�- 'ft'�•L"`• dF�.... itAr7* '-e ti n�'ir : �: �: fi� '�+� �� ,, : , Cgncep `�y al Design 3 : , , ,= �u f �_ .t f ' e -T4Re. °i.e a o.rd; _ .=-k. F .c. - �.. �•1.�, _4,�- A i.a<,�_ y:.e���- ,x `��^�� ' _. �+-. s 0 :t".�€�����,'k � ,.t`;_ ��-, ,••,*4 ,{.• - 'g :;;��u`a -t ' ,i 11: , bm ittal,T;yp . w Authority tm �4,ut a r -1,,- r y Kam....... - �_�,� �:3��.� .:T�, ��. n. .i.����;�4;.u, h�o�r�.tY ,R Conceptual Site Plan Review Recommendation Final Decision Conceptual Model Home Architecture Plan Review Final Decision Appeal Process Overview: Design Review is a two-part process required for all new residential and non-residential projects in the Town, comprised of a Conceptual Design and Final Design. The intent of the Conceptual Design is to ensure that a project's overall site layout is functional within its boundaries and is compatible with the surrounding area. During the Conceptual Design process a Conceptual Site Plan and Conceptual Model Home Architecture Plan must be submitted for review and approval. Next, the Final Design process includes the submittal, review, and approval of the Final Plat and construction documents. The intent of a Final Design is to ensure that a project's Final Plat and construction documents are in accordance with the Town's and outside agencies' adopted codes and provisions. Final Design is the last step an applicant must complete before permits can be issued. Conceptual Design — Process Description Step 1 — Pre-application Meeting It is strongly recommended that applicants attend a pre-application meeting with the Development Review Committee (DRC) for a preliminary review of their proposed development to discuss the required process and broad issues related to the proposed development. The DRC is comprised of Town staff responsible for reviewing and commenting on an application. To initiate a pre-application 2 • meeting, applicants must submit a written request and preliminary drawings 10 working days prior to the expected meeting date. (Applicants should refer to the attached "Request for Pre-application Conference" form for additional details.) The Development Review Committee will send a review letter identifying any broad concerns with the application and the project's development process within 3 working days following the meeting. Step 2 — Neighborhood Meeting Pursuant to Section 22.15 of the Zoning Code, applicants are required to hold at least two neighborhood meetings to encourage public participation. The first meeting is an educational session to inform stakeholders of the Town's process and applicable provisions of the General Plan and Zoning Code. The second meeting is an opportunity for the applicant to present their project, solicit feedback, and address issues and concerns. The Planning and Zoning Administrator may have the discretion to combine the meetings or request additional meetings as needed. Step 3 — Formal Submittal Once the public participation requirement is satisfied, applicants may submit a formal Conceptual Design package that includes: - Conceptual Site Plan - Conceptual Model Home Architecture Plan To ensure timely review, applicants should review the applicable provisions of the Zoning Code and address the comments of the pre-application review letter. Step 4 — Staff Review After receiving a complete application, staff will review the Conceptual Design in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Zoning Code, engineering standards or other areas of review authority. A review letter will be sent to the applicant within 20 working days of the submission. The plans may need to be revised and re-submitted for additional reviews to address comments on the application. When all review comments have been addressed, the application will be forwarded to the Conceptual Design Review Board for a review. Step 5 — Conceptual Design Review Board The purpose of the Conceptual Design Review Board (CDRB) is to promote attractive, safe, and compatible developments. Staff will prepare a report and recommendation on the application to the CDRB. The Conceptual Design is reviewed by the CDRB within 15 working days of receipt of a staff recommendation. The CDRB's recommendations and decisions are based on the Design Principles outlined in Sections 22.9, 27.3, and Design Standards, Addendum "A" of the Zoning Code. CDRB decisions are subject to an appeal by the Town Council. Step 6 — Town Council Meeting and Decision The Town Council is the legislative body that makes the final decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the Conceptual Design. Following CDRB recommendation, a staff report is prepared and sent to the Town Council approximately 10 days prior to the Council meeting. Following the meeting, an action letter is sent to the applicant including any final conditions on the request. 3 Step 7 — Proceed to Final Design After receiving an approval from the Town Council, applicants may submit a Final Design to the DIS staff. Final Design — Process Description Step '1 — Submission and Review The Final Design is an administrative review of the following documents: - Final Site Plan and Final Model Home Architecture Plan - Final Plat and Improvement Plans - Landscape, Irrigation, Buffer Yard, and Water Harvesting Plans These documents will be reviewed by the Town Staff and outside agencies for conformance with the approved conceptual plans and adopted codes and provisions. A letter will be sent to the applicant within 20 working days of the submission to notify the applicant of an approval or if further revisions and re-submittals are needed. Step 2 — Approval Upon approval, the DIS Department will issue permits for the development. Construction document approvals shall expire if improvements have not commenced within 2 years of the date of approval of the Final Design. Applicant may submit a request to the Town Council requesting an extension of time within two years of the date approval of a Conceptual Design. 4 1A TOWN OF ORO VALLEY BOARD MEETING SCHEDULE — 2012 TOWN COUNCIL P&Z CDRB BOA 1 st & 3rd 1st Tuesday 2ND Tuesday Wednesday 411,Tuesday 01/04/2012 01/03/2012 01/10/2012 01/24/2012 01/18/2012 02/07/2012 02/14/2012 02/28/2012 02/01/2012 03/06/2012 03/13/2012 03/27/2012 02/15/2012 04/03/2012 04/10/2012 04/24/2012 03/07/2012 05/01/2012 05/08/2012 05/22/2012 03/21/2012 06/05/2012 06/12/2012 06/26/2012 04/04/2012 07/03/2012 07/10/2012 07/24/2012 04/18/2012 08/07/2012 08/14/2012 08/28/2012 05/02/2012 09/04/2012 .09/11/2012 09/25/2012 05/16/2012 10/02/2012 10/09/2012 10/23/2012 06/06/2012 11/06/2012 11/13/2012 11/27/2012 06/20/2012 12/04/2012 12/1 1/2012 07/011/2012 07/18/2012 08/01/2012 08/15/2012 09/05/2012 09/19/2012 10/03/2012 10/17/2012 11/07/2012 11/21/2012 12/05/2012 12/19/2012 Please note: a project cannot go forward to the next review level until all issues have been addressed and approved by the Public Works review manager and project planner. **Holiday(will need to determine date for meeting) or Election Day (will need to schedule another meeting room) 10 I .5 Residential Conceptual Des ign Review F low Chart r•r.,;k ii'i ,a`' t+'`/S,� 'J.'.^+a`7''i'M�':�y.7�w[iY rL7 4ii;wr rr rti i�,^ �'n! r�:«�A:a.."<'i:t 41 ilr'rt1. t/.ur'�Kf� ' `�!k>�' o,i+'r- 2;, x.e, .l tr�r ,� _. , ,.3 � � r. d;, ' * ' -•. Town Council Post Town 1 ; :P�r �,�� pl.f.ca#�o,n,{�' N �Neighb�orfoatd ` yF .FMar�rral, Sdtibm;ita� C oncep �a]'Design a ui�i' • 2yy,,r"w1=�,y::�f' ..5 k�^,i'a;=°'1.�`Ns.,h;`t'u 0 ,,t-g, 4.Y i; ,�, ta'if,r�i3O•••'=,k.4-r i: y S...R:. -} ;► �:�; s� r. r ,r -,,�," a egt.q,53,,. + >~ Ewa, Review''Baard Council Process I�1'eett n'g "~a� � ' J ItJe of F ' Iz , i> :�'�� :>��.��>n �r,3:� �����.• ?`�.m����,•��'��,.� �,4��:�• :�•_�g� �:��,� �„7;a n d��.eva ew,�,� ,r•• M:e�et i n'g Rv: w u,r r ia;::-.'-.iiii'r''+,+y,-ro`X- w,. u �,z,.i:,".u�9K'�-M ltr7,a,c''�^'rt�.u'¢ u<4'�.�?'F ,�fM�;�,x,fJ'a y,; ku a�;��s1 ''�A�jO�� �• ��a'' °; .x e: ` ; ' ',::.e rrat'ent of�a c a s ;'fie urpos;e'of the The Town Council is a -Staff shall notify the :ram.�; �e<,�(e- pPpII:C;at c�nw:,��'� 'Th.e.t:p�rrpQ>S'e"�a�,_t .�t. ,��r ,,. , r�• n a+la"'RS":1 «?LS ▪aNRr« �2Gh a.?? �ixl.•. r y�r46Ci4Jn"F x M "C 1 a 1`,.k� .Tt ygy.3.:..r yz{ti"r.Y} F p .«: :..'r ' e'etrr ' fro de'sa r, s-'r e�'I{,'taa,•�l�oihe'einrsaesr�'n.,eya,e�wG`3R) sa' � nceptual,gesign legislative body that applicant of all conditions �±wm1:J1y oeF 'giti?.�� fy'�'"�h4�`.�.i.:Y�? t�S"Sra1rh'647Y,+Sf,.✓d�,:.� u�}�w7vt'l�ilatw�' ,uS 3es1t _�,yt•. � „ 4 .a' .l:rc'anncpaf:..},�`*� �typrrsv� e nfcrrmat�o�; Y�, �,denirptFie' roycsbver�ll Revrew,`Board•(GDRB)is makes the final decision of approval. :r,..h,Pt; i,.:.-.,'h6��',•+!I,y.•:''„'Me!l,V3f;�i"r,J :`3r� ';.i1'' ,iX'�G'' `?#�'- ,'M ,:T,�sP15a,G•'fki^��,r>t�,l� ,;..�1" �. 4�•`¢+'ir+t,!vP�_.J..cr.:•as,�t. , .•+. _ i<�todtcu'ss th'e�`To rs° � at:ctfa :]"ta'e' (a yr ,,�, "sltePst nits= :ctorlfi ' toprorrote attra• ct•ive', • to approve, deny or yy� r'y {•'j✓'f''u'ii.<renh .`d'U:Y+rt.:•.",�,�.11n r,.4.rit v .e,w.« �`�1k "7'Ll,�b .,t Ia.`F'�'`�:iK:"4i:e"'c I.id,�..'yiN"e.v�,,i hr ..:.,�.. .,... „�K,J'1!t' I YYT�'�l't7Ff 011E�tf..�` '{t`k'.'rr,,wt ,«last '+�:-�''S ,r }?fie e1o:.rr�en,}�"proce��� _. . i,'cgm,:u tea'rn :e ,eke, I ��'wrt'han•�xts haur� ar�:earacfa s'afe;.•and compatible • conditionally approve the '' es c' R'•;i%t+.rd',,.'.._t„''P,"''''.'?S5-,',•• �I4 i'al,`,.. i�'4`'""'gr4t Hiatt et ;•• P r i Y,�`P.!K'•i i ,'•-' . t 1:r.,�I�!Itky'E' .A;a;r,•r` L:.. r aY;u, . 4.,arap,�oe.tissj.e ,f`]:Fa� ,s 41, ` 't.tfbef e,ll�oa.1.r�a,4i r,,341. .;„,at it;m P rove'„ mm ,vare it vrt develop rent_ CDR pac.ka'ge. The:applicant shall ra M:i• • �'.,...?[l';.4..-?•-4, `•,,i1Y._I ii''•.irr.., `.•.Av.0-1.1 4.0r„..e,`',M,1..oiv. rM tj."•(.. '$.',�,�"4,..tr?U ;aF.+f,4,'�'.,y 0.r?.'t� `,) •!r y.-;s,. .. 7.,1° (r � , .,ter,,�� ¢y;R, r! M s nr ec h•bo:r_s'�`7:'_ x+``�x "� �¢�'t' e.so ro" dry({area�� ,. submit •a Final Design i S',+. "'`�'' �a eAa^e,',��1'�r� ',.h1K+l�'�i��.r�S�'',dl� ?'S,tyl!r�.�nd `''`'�"�"�'�:•'r�yi�u�'rj�F�:r,k[,a,r' ��F S'J.;..:�i�,�,.A„�'',N 1'�. �r�•�•lq}.`J�' �,,rtr..s:_xq��. 4:.1 rf ,,, L.,1 xis �rlby: , �' Mi u,' .�,�.,an,^t�x;.: .r1. .. x3 , �,I /�1• Review(FUR)Package "t S i< �J:N 1 i C ,F ix7Y e. ��y Ltf5 G,�,1. y F z1'. I r+yt`� I i ti, r r� �.• r:.•----.}.. -:•- .`5,,, •$arts°s(;,, i�� r5 k ri. F.: ..ail=�•,l,i-#.1.-,. ;--,,4.p, ,,,4-•-.�r h <.ry r PJ ,L std O N;?.n'i r^j ,(I 4,.Y r„ IF ,r. rta ,i.:,)� s... fs,n 1 I n'�Y M ,-t" �,w x r l,v. , ,t,.$1 .+r..:l,}) 7"'r''A ?�a^^n .n,•i.rir', =F' t {�,. '` �r �, ,,y u:�"' �y .+ Yk11' ( '�.` •`... �"ixis" to •i'e- I c:atton ii J,Lr'''' 4?r li`L�4�ziP�fik`2p�y'c r�'y1°%d"' `�: fy ••'i. gei3«,•: `4"`r a J'9u•tt6z: I'°'1,',,r.+ 'i: CPC!. ""'RBrs .e.r-and The Town Council shall for an administrative Y'�=L��r� r��p�'' •.' _ �:,=1„�'r:k a�'1,L,:r,,,�.a, r�e'�,�.+f`rir�"•�t'"= }•,�k'7�a�,�,f11k 'V,�' �,�• rr..rn�1,71 r.,g.• r a,l'";ed � :�i=• !l,. _ •a F.K•h:1'1.,S xr4,..r.•.lti..r�t�n''n•!,t ..�'..sp�'r�' tGF�+: .� '."'x:. i. ,r'rr:;r1'''�'a;�:,.4•�,'-'l .c.. 1� ,. •. eet n. r ut,e��tla g rr���, rca �re�'r rya ,ed'� efoTct►a�.'`,ubmtttal,° r Y f , one[�ro ct..s consider a GDR nacka a re�riew. ie'"=t' :N'�`,r �� '��'�..:'-'�P'p'�.,�:'�Ij�.G!rr"3.n:'-�� '�nR?"', F,,rl:q�"��`;4�� ,' "r il�'�t��`.�••i'��:tay�• ��,s�t.�"�'�.Lr+,i'iri�f'ec'N?'ul'+'G�' ,:r!'�c'n+ t.S'x.,� , 1 • ^ F' g rr, a'4. ,,�' >� '� }�, , '' �.. de3 a.desrgn}C 3arad'er a:n at its next regular .t�bm�,a , a'tcoc.�ir�le�et�,.�n��ha�:^�.a���e.ast ..-...-,tt '; �;�.��,�'ncli��e t1,, ,ezkr3e,�he►�r;ar�.� rr.r _ L, "1,...•,Y:,`'.,7g'LF.n ay ;«9 M':o;?._=;.r'4,l.af"y.,,,ti. ,�lac;.ha,h�.t�, +7i..#,`�lr'fK,rNt>G.��e t7.�he y gip,."'ltL n"',I r`9+°?,,{c.i..� 1bf?F' V`"�F:' 'zZ',++1. .1y,:k 1y,. -.?t�..iil. • Ila'n 10 -4 a�1❑ rr."atiora.afittas ,, rye,''.' �ef tll'aP ics,.. na"; s�g", ,g.p.').4.ale,af�a:vVdri ept ,a i-, _r co«mtnu,n•lty fit, rrreeting not less t A!9 t= .N�'.s r{� Yf 01 �i Re nil, ti-A.•,[rr, �i'1.4r',8 �,`lr'wi. i�.. s"x'.t!lY•v ,.,. an,'i:�rt a a� ha ,E�OI�i't rS•N 0,:i .t., i r �h ,tom` e ,� k,n .�'1+r r�` { „�Fz , �aN yµ9 rs ,r ,.y calendar days of croncpp t`ua=J� o '' ,r (aP�ana;n,{�c�an br1< (jti, �RI!anannGptii'al vu..F,4 •The submitted FDR S t`Sp a. i 4y:,s¢,C� y�dx. rl iSy' P!;r kItn'1'.V `si��yi`-i% .. d"h"riWt f1aa. iSTr,7 (YP@f,r::b TKM ,c7 +,YT «+r.. r,c,s: r . ' �.f14.1.404014,7,44,:q.A � : , ,.,d } +l}� q 'vy"',;."t � ,.. ::{. receiving 3 formal Package sha11 contain �!, k ,•+.. A.rEnyl� ._ „x ti a t.,e 'F �� I1 etr�me;Tx chat'? t1 �. �.' "r�.L•n�/w ` ' >`�,a{'•M }7SS"'t'I t '.'1. x, i'• M"1•,,�.'w 17�.,w'�'`.tr.3s.r� �c•�1.'FC'±!:".th' ,r. .'.y�r.,,_7 t.^;. ' �rr.� fy.� , 7., esr!` ,:'Y ^�r�;,L:u- ,� ' -W �~. e fi3RB'sr inn. recommendationfrom theinformation outlined in,, 0,,,r." !y ,�..„..,,.,,,,t g.,r, SSIyS e{tAra-.4, .�J rl,b. v q.v4 Apr a ie,,.,�`'kie,, ik'?'rr,c•{"'.•�""r ,"a'p',SLo,'•. .;yti,A- �1° .( it d Jo'k• t"',ie.": w•;'•• rl':a'l , ''{'',1, . t a L✓''d Y( ,.,•s�` ,( A �. a..0^t! R. � . , y,l r ��rx r r,. y "rrr� p�(es arEe_A taGa alas mu• 'rbe °a :.�� s � � .u"e;a `y : �'� r �;,., ^ " ' •CDRB_ t:he FDR ProceJsGuide „.. ., > Gam ,, 1 Q ] �y� � �,•;,a - � Phn ,l + +y -Tc IFy $.' " •q 1n`f'r rM",S, #4s,74rt1�1S'! Puyi t• :h'?'Bs 4r? J.li t',^ i�' ' •4•.t .. .. �-r..+_..� ,a ,a. �r r , •rr�,-,',�°', r; ,' ithil' :4 . ac'o•p}e'd tg',n b and address a II � e3Y1JdYlrl :�,y� t-=fit�$✓fi�J� rtQli Ckr�� � P, 5 v2 ' t �t;i,,,: e.;scP,w :,;l�r ;, yr. r r u:u J• c ' �,t r N! A i ,y„ R,lA? t F?!1 1 x,: + r�F7 ��mt.< FITa�.Y. d 3 ca�i:�. •i r y i,. •:r fi�i.. r 's �, ..f ,,�Ewa.{ ir. k ri�� # ,a, . . � ,'r5,. .,r �., r �,r': 3;„� or+ e tri"es a�tlined.''rn conditions of approval. "v*etr,6ti.a, f,g „.` .�7 ' e illo.l 11{ ,.x:.+a i y0;;y{. ,�,i1R a gaff, ara84 wrth, .,,,,l:-g, rt �_ ,, ;fir P sr;�;�?bM•� ,i.�Glt:�9'��,%'le,Kf�"'°�'iL4+%'''�':�' tt' :I'y,�q�(,. �,.t•.:�i..:1+.n,� f�!,u,sw ,.,t,,a.mkt,, r.• .1.{ ^,r"_- y:. .u�. -«•,. S'i: ., .�.�.. rn, ;� �.>".F; G r frl}�r °> _�° �� first f wAcltendmw and;• •Denied GDR packages ~�r<eX .e��et�'�:�ee��ta' ,t�a"t �.�;r'�:��� v[r�,� .�,.:, =- � :�;State �. 415�81 affr�s a�llr;r.`f�_ = r. ,.• is :�," ry r_ FYNe ,f••, ri, .:«« x P 7 L 4. y� y,•,,t•r-,xr5'S"':,"+.,.a.SY',J4"F;.,, v'.'GI{+ r Tty'�;,k r",�y.yl4,,$ Ir1 i � I>♦.u^6S'.1.. 'r�.•."�1�,'�4:r A., .,ti, '�,.+,d.� , n ti5`i g� nd 27:3 of:.� must be re-submitted �ti ..5 tv ratsii hart a°4 : .n, 1s yg �'v a ,j��F,w n �ta'�?R ! ' '"ti ..�.,:�!Y•' F� .� .,..i�i�'J'r`Fy'N41';i�.n;_� ^�'i'ti'�� ��� .!�„ ...4 Fir �a9' 'ugd,aa a�;o• �nd 'iWtjnrn.g code within•15 working'dayys � 'ia.) p Pj : .t �,;° ry,�,, ,r��. , �� r. �Ly:4 s.,., �}�`�, l�.Z ,trf�'..,i:{�' ,F,rcr t r ai'J... i1 i1.�f . 1.- r. r.� ., p..r r; 0 r N 7' [� sty n� .G I�] _y �, Yr-?4� �.� � r=�.�r-1��,.I,Y ye�.)ron n:a�] �t��'e 'a�Plc:a�'.af'ya"r�4� d M"}Y 1,M •i 1 ••t+�-{w. • i .,1 :`,. .. •t ..I'KA.1 I_13.1. P.,�,i:x'G'`jYJ ` '2fa.�uSGrG ie--- y..i'"'�n ,0-1,1'.'M;3 .HC^.`. ;.r,7''�'f 1.7.44C,Lra4`'""1'.•..'1,a, :wt'•,�t'•t•1*ti• �,.t�r:;t , .Y.f4' :•-1.,a'eri'Yir.;•..rv,'�rY',1''rx�C'y'�r,i, ^#«. r,v T� '¢, ,'�',ra,,Leki ,,�..7'�ir. -- will.be r 1g,,�t•. ,=t �4„g s ;, , . '.rig ''�.,, . Y ,, y,, wi e7 ,},...,nt e d f'I 7:e:c-'�e � •fro�,�,�1: ..,,.L.,,fi •ti a.r;__ wh:'ich t>�e package ;Y....�;`"Jl r��� �'eyC�r.;'y�.gip,;•, '�} .,,'h�v,f7a[�1� �'��.a�l.�,einr,,1,g'i.}r_W r. S4��Prl,,, .Y.: F,,. �'�i•ti N. 3 Rr-, �yr-r.kt...1,•'" i a o.x. ,i �y? ro ,.r z. _'t ,. ,r ti w: :x l:,t ,44, xyr a' W g1a' . . ; ig •.,yaY `'`� `'tS�1a�'r i, x.�� ::�b'": ', 4�:r;N r��,s�a�:K >��$ ';?�i?�t'T� k�, ?�.��"•�f" �'�c'' r'`�;'w .,'�I'.t�CDI�� , a ..�-. •Te-GU'nSrCl'e're••d. '-=• 4o1 :: t Su_"4,1 l.y._ 2 •� iw 5"• ra. ,. 14.-0< .,r� WO kfn t a 4.; p �„�r..,•r_.t irr' h 1 '� , s` { 4a,�77 S sr' a ,., ! y'r'Kl,r ,-t,',1,�. er.. .�, 4._•,.k t,; .}'.:, �• �; � �«�� km Pr% f:J .. •l= r Y"�1��•j,£" �N« ,.� 7'��gl. d -w '.�,�,.ri• .e,:�.•,�y mq,f,,a.1- 1 t,, n T I a• f�,1' rr q. ? �'.'., �.,-.0.'. b.a r# uoar" ;'',..:r' ":. .'{f' ..D.,y Iil. ¢¢. - i 1 r�.-' 'y14,-, ,,41A.,1, 8'�•�r,,;;1. ... 4••r�]'! -"�y1''StE.10,,• `4,t,r�,3'�a - rafaan,a is ati:a,!"fit •e v. w�,), 7rE A k ..• r'. , .L•,L"` 'Y, ,, ,r - ',ei 44 t C41 Ei[Tt2 ti(? ,5;.1•.,. a:. .,.� �C�; -sY,tii^�. y.,,,�,;1 ar+,���a'�r4�L�•c,l�,r �'�tl1 •�';7',� 'Nape, �"�''S1'��1"�Ar��:r. .Ri�'��t• �; wr,..t7,�r.<�{ ,f�y,�,r•,,u�.v r'�yi.�. i«' , •.•. gt" 1f coat, Y .. J. cv, f.,r. A N•'J' fi Ew• �,r r r ?.I 1 kK d • 5©eare;o me.tRere. ''` ,-=:A Irartts_ �a ,r ° L "', ,,.1�} t. ac ;in'�'.andrfirarxg�s wrtl:: is `..a•',3x 1+r"f', r rr , �Aa� zn.f t5sl,• ,y ryti�r��•yF. a ,22. ,i wgirt i�n3"� ; it rls8-,: S �;C N,.•-• 1�e wTI 'ee v"liitfa° co',i_ ,rrat .M'a rr�eetrn I _,, .�.,,,,t� f�n'g; h. r,J. :'� a: i.w_ ,� a to e I4St ,P lil3.,,-,-'�iga:,4 �_"r ,��`�'•"`<,5,,.4,,,a.0};,F's;r-- a•uv4r�+u,-.0.� t r 1 io..• .r ,, 1W44.9.i e , ,A..,., : „.,. - a,.10b tla ri �da .tt e,, te ortr.i r+v�il evecta o', Iyvitor!=C;a'pn�c,1 ,n,.,te:0_ . a :f r ..>. .�im? ram°,!s�r a R,7,5!$_, I ' r, "�. ett�„ xyr t�.,� div•:, .ANz, '.ki--,, l .t ,v• nq ,";i ^7.ti A al'at.s f., '/C .,b. "i,: Yl' i16 „�"R.aln: i �. v, aocp�ra:at7o lvilfhe„h#or 4, trt.... ink ltrvworkrn ,day�. ,wr as�,fq Iv.//,.fr«IrL.er..y!�i��'�,�{15 Lr?✓C�?i.4"^�.ra�grr`9,i.C1 y�•t„ •?a"$'�.:��'Y�� �,iu•,U��.,.'.'-•7, t ��.A!,,�.;.y^V. 's!•y t ffY. 4, x �;t' r u� .t;,,��1I , , •,'�'.,�! � t xg � � �� J r• � �M• ,.k � • as 1yW tY!4 ,r �+Crr �iJ t 4 ly^i' r0'.�' Wu,a.,1C ,t. .�1,,",,.a .�w2'alt. d .!>1•,;'. yt .+,"r • .r+ W,-t„• •j t ",r� yk�*:.: ,�. yk a g,I.•Afi I'.t;y,C yam^,)F +.F i_r �t',r /p d •r• ., ,.�!�4, n_ .a,, �'' ."O ''u f 1 ', '0:1$ 4'!•, 4.�.Y b'•l,k �,)Sri ;:; 0.p:-.b.Ir f. b:,„ste•,t ,Rk:'��,r it ;l rf`'Ii1�F1"u ,' ?ti w».Z,6,p'i.,a^,Y :�,i��'rTs:y(t�r;9 i•{�"4.o�a ,�?s}1'�1�+A c'il.�ls.tpd Y; s� 4 .., _:: 4d r a St, 'w7, aaann#1 .i+" ):--,sea,.. '`N,.. I�'r R '�* pro -:�t l Gar .Yt,t .. + �6 ,� ,'�' F t�(;;, ai.'��',k;,.,h.�.- gig,.c, } .F v ./r�+. ,� �c1.1 v,.:'t"••,. }, ��r. a 1 t� �, , •.,r ,[ti� '�:.ri s '�':. 'a: ry F C S,{F$�,�,T am'1; H'Y3 •� ,,.,, � �!"1 1 �'�TI'l„y KI �j`�y i� �rf w.:r vl t r 1 a A,{'�"r-�•!L,w �r y., ,,7�,�,;s i",:Ei�i. e.99 wi Sri ,•"r .7 ti+,4 t'+r v.F.� .� a•a !I�h-, S';S fi r .M ,a'yytS p�r7`F,',at ,e,i,yly,-- •'•- 1,,',�. 14...t ,r,ll,li T•'L 41.;.},ftl ;s„ 44,1,1��n I;,..T. .4fit lty i.11. •k,,.;,4! ., :• ,•-; •,;,,Yr ZFt '."tt 1._.,�.�t,':",0.4 f'• U S J.J,I `+s l'd `,,,,,4nY'fir 3, 'a i<i ry,'r.,,!o ra'Gp �{u a i.;.Q.rs� �"i�''o`� ,c:i '',,. v L'r f4L'�.i.:.--giti.��,gilr",�!',, ;'%�i s 4:L.ylrSr,'fit*.54a 3 pr' !{.r,� ,it ' .�•q ''. 1 ,tr' `S,aF .,4,, y ti.f•..ot 1,..-r -4", � ,�r�� �'3a-r<��.`ttr"'�' s._. .a'+r9. '1�,e't�.c.�:;PJX'-2.' C;$. �`,Sb'L`'7z'?w+ rshri. ,6r .'fir?::�.y.,�s'c»°�*w�;;"o}�••,�'`°'(�'.I Fm{. .r?;:r.4.KT:!\:�«'Z Yin ' '�,,4-1C 2c._'�,«'r '�,,Ati f+.` +rr,. . rl ,� •' y , ,r tY A .t ijr,-+,,\fly S., ,r„y..,��t Ir, itra r.{';h, �: � ,,. . . , -:;' k e �onsub(�er.44.F; at! ': ,b tta�s J+rif ie,, �t� rr ,,�:, ��"'r s�i>yCl a.m�,�i� ,wti ht'�x��,a I c+N,4����i�,•3y{r�prcr� .`Pa�;�s?+�''?3,H��i 5` :rr� „��;'A,7s?!IK i'"�.� a'�'M'r � 'rl�r'0",av�„r � .a„� •' .,,��' "�4r{r 4 rr. '`�wk � n'ot-...-h aii'l at+er t �' "r 7 • ''q" .tb .-r > .: , �t�'.. .'+�F�s'!.,'3 t `t,�i t 'I fl,,"y 1�fi. '°r �., Da oait,*Ff t:,,Lira.S1w,10-4 dia� t 'e+r kte,.-v ' . § y' r '^,..�'-;V�'" �9' •v,t, 24,,,,..4s...,'�i r.r��.r+tJ iv t•• r '¢J +�t'"'•^,� %n" S "' ,�, T .J ,r„1r 7\`'�ry Z t s !+ .[ ) n .i, Af fi a;g. ,,, i'Y�ti'� E_-.t ,7:,.:t ., .jVA-1- ri .. t ' t �" t <,R'' a��'cvyy's,'';"` �c�;��-�� �£�v,��•�' �,�,�, .,�.: ,„S--rILE+'��J10X: t r'�,t,t�,.n�r ;!,•""•,r,,�`��:S�.�G:ep��78��t'�Sdg�r�etfl�W",Spa' } *',i";�� :7^',,,�'�, a?i. Z��.�'_ �,�u- ,,;� tr�r ,+���1��1-r�..,- �'rrl� Y v,;L.Ji'�„'f+..,�•'k' �n '-,- w,, J +x.'�.. ...� L `� r :(l'>'.• •;'�.7;;vJ 5f,'•.8u"F' np" it yS'•,'„ '' y r,�r 'i• ,s�t,• 's.rR, �;,�'t �6 y r .,. asY_. r"'r','''?r t•� w , yk' •d'+�',,�•• fh p L ��,�'�`� '� r�.�wS�yr��"�s "'M'� ;4'i,+ �r<�a.▪;"-� t .,.,r��.•4d _r. 1 frr ,t�;,(},r-'['_,x ��t'a'� a'oit�e�s��'t�,. a,'P•a 1,,� +t''N?,I.c+E� � 9r^a� r,.r rr3`1'`r. �rJ;rl''l ,1L. ,�,e t .f, ,y��1 Y3`F,LtR _.."7..'��?,;i'�h'.,cvt"Zi? .r �,�u. ,h,>' -4,^c:+1�i 1 'a'd"�"'ap7Q�r """,x .r^'.yit� 1Pr�",�i" '.F'ir1 ,,y .,,y!'�}.a``ftt 1" °,G�FacfPaV'4' ,[$ x'4'i�r f(?L',r> '��ti`{i3is'iscd{ '#rT'inFn,4a. a :ri ltpir< �'r+ 7frt`ti� In aA jl •9rta y rr�r w.,,,. , 1�„r .y..•. ...,�:,'f r+ ;,4, y�.i•Y�,,�_y,•�+;x 9 �r i'"L'[Y �.,Grin,4.;v.�c d' 1, ,td,l�•;^"r,�.+ia w 'Cft^'ra••.,r't • +k�nt}t`,tT+,�ry��,!�'�7i' " '1� �9'';a at 4T:.+e u"i'1. .�iGn'i'�'tE,l„'"•. :C1 t�„ y„t,�,:�,, J�:<.3„a �* �•.`, tl. .:w blyry,4ti.'•''g'trN.`. N'�y� .«'fir,, «,:. ;�- Ya r,., � r � tVtlFtf,25;'da S.:<Of•a t'Iot,ess than 10'cal nCEI k'4 ;�.74'0:�� ''Q + , x . Wfq'th -4201a� (PFli -- 4 1ll'..1 ng+D r _ '. r,... Y P tTown Cott r *f 'Kti r , ,_. }� w 'x� ���: � N ,t -t,,� a �,,. : -.' ' 3�1 —� days of a.CDRB ".�,� .� r ..p, ,_ ,, 1_{ btio, ... .,, , � ,, '�;a '4 , .v ;: >r t � . ; co a f at o n a rova f 1, l,t4ejokv,oeri104. .4,., fo !I�su44*. rzyg A_.---. e;u:P nodi:k;py+ aft PP � -n' ez '1 ";,: ,e ry � L4, �r,�,"'I�rlx+rrtw`' m 1 r}`z #i,..1�yi Y�y��a P i N yin m y�t,K recommendation i yA -,� ,,•�'•F3' .r>5: ,..a .r:'�ef�r'.s. z?S ,..Igo v-r +?,t - a,, �. 1 .t' l P s r 1 44 y, 'L, ,..r t tan +, p 'Fl '., 2.:t 'ti*�s?'a:'3'i:.r.�l,1.•'s. ... �;x.`3a ;r�n:i:�kf 4.'53��itY^x in a.�tf ,7�; ^},i.n�teis 'r.r�.r�� „•air,fS3�# n y' .. LLEY A ;►P ..,, Rig ° = y�','., : °� 2.0 ORO VALLEY CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN ;,•�..... � Yr ,; CONTENT aFOU t.: :- 6, LADED 2.1 PLAN FORMAT All Sheets c":;lit The conceptual site plan must be drawn to a scale of one inch equals forty feet . (1"=40') on sheets measuring 24" x 36". Scale to be the same for all sheets. Different sheet size or scale must be pre-approved by the Town Engineer and Planning Division Manager. . 2. The conceptual site plan must include a page border, 1/16" (0.0625 inches) width, with one-half(1/2") inch margins on the top, bottom and right hand sides of the page; and a two (2") inch margin on the left hand side of the page. 3. Margins are to only contain the name of the project in the lower right hand corner below the Title Block. ,, 4. All lettering and dimensions must be the equivalent of twelve (0.12") point font or greater in size. C) In the lower right corner of each sheet, provide a Title Block which includes: --' ,,'`i ..i'. "Conceptual Site Plan" ii. Name of development S L wa ON -a ,, _ _ E Lots ;through * and Common Areas AIC.1 c..-- through ", if applicable. ( } Brief legal description, i.e. "Portion of r Section , T S, R E, G&SRB&M, Town of Oro Valley, Pima County, Arizona gt v Scale 0 v Contour interval ( f;= vii. Date (revised plans must show date of revision) viii. Town of Oro Valley case number for this plan ix. Sheet of (total pages) .)'--- (.9 Reference related Case Numbers e. plan amendments, rezoning, 9 general variance) adjacent to the title block on each sheet. cy1 °i `. Each sheet must bear the seal, signature, and registration expiration of the registered professional who prepared the plan in the lower right hand corner near the title block. 12 8. 'Show north arrow and scale bar towards the top of each page that include the site layout. Every effort-muSThe made to have north oriented toward the top of the sheet. Some slight rotation may be made to accommodate long narrow parcels, convenient match lines, etc., but in no case will the north arrow point downward without pre-approval. 7)9 If the conceptual site plan consists of more than one (1) sheet, a small index P''" ' drawing of the site showing the area represented on each sheet must be placed on the right side of each sheet. 1O. If the firm name, address and phone number of the registrant who prepared the plan is to be listed on every sheet, then it must be in the lower right hand corner of the page immediately next to the Title Block. 2.2 PLAN CONTENT All Sheets ,31,1 Town limits must be shown on or immediately adjacent to the project site, where applicable. -1°2. Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of any General Plan amendment, rezoning, Conditional Use Permit (CUP), annexation, or variance conditions. . All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) must be indicated on all site layout drawings Y 9 with zoning boundaries clearly defined. Include subdivision name, recording information, lot lines and lot numbers. Addressing: Provide interior street names, if applicable C f c PP All naming and signage of streets shall conform to Pima County's Addressing Ordinance and Policies, Sections 18.83.060 through 18.83.080. 0y1,5. Ensure all line types are different and clearly indicated. e 16.The development exterior site property boundary line must be delineated with a solid BOLD line, which must be the boldest line on the plan. NA- 1-7. If more than one zone applies, show the zoning boundary line on the plan. 148. If the proposed development must be depicted on more than one plan sheet due to scale, adequate match lines must be provided "See sheet " on edges of the plan where an abutting sheet depicts more information. Cover Sheet 19. The following is to be centered at the top of the cover sheet in bold lettering with a font of forty (0.40") point or greater: i. Conceptual Site Plan 13 ii. Project Name iii. Oro Valley Case Number (Using format OVXXXX-XX) 20. A site plan of the entire project (scale to vary to accommodate placement on the cover sheet) is to be centered, toward the top of the page directly below the information listed above; and is to include at a minimum, the following: ri North arrow a Lot lines Sheet cuts j.I-. Circulation 4„/; Name of adjacent development (including Book and Page). Graphically depict abutting lot lines and significant land use features such as adjacent parking, etc wi. Proposed and existing on-site and off-site roadways. Include street names and whether public or private. )..p_,T =lr ' ' = � 21. All general notes to be numbered and listed on the cover sheet. If any additional room is needed, general notes may be continued on the second sheet. 22. Each section of the plan (e.g. Site Plan, General Notes, Location Map, etc) must be Titled and labeled in a font no less than fourteen (0.14") point. 2 _.. If the project is located within the boundaries of a Planned Area Development (PAD), include a reduced-scale map of the PAD District on the right hand side of the cover sheet, indicating the location of the portion being developed. 24. A legend which depicts and describes all symbols used in the document. 25. List the following on the cover sheet: i. The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of : `8. The primary property owner of the site The developer of the project, The registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents must be provided. Ai. The Arizona registrant responsible for preparing the conceptual site plan must seal all drawings and supporting documents in accordance with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines 26_ Location Map 14 A small project location map must be drawn in the upper right hand corner with north oriented to the top of the sheet. The map must cover approximately one (1) square mile, be drawn at a scale of-3" =1-mileand-provide-the following information: a. The subject property identified and centered within a one square mile area 4r Any adjacent conditions (e.g. subdivisions, non-residential development, un-subdivided land, schools, existing zoning, major streets, rivers, railroads, National Forests and city, town or other jurisdictional limits). c9 The section, township and range of the subject development Labeled section corners A north arrow and scale Plan Sheet(s) -Existing Conditions Content The following information must be shown on all plan sheets to indicate the existing conditions on the site and within one hundred (100) feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street, the existing conditions across the street will be provided to a minimum distance of 100 feet. Existing elements must be indicated in a different line weight than the proposed improvements and labeled or noted to be removed or retained. I 27. xisting contours at one foot intervals labeled at a five foot index frequency. v Two-foot or five foot contours may be used in special cases. Extend contours 100 feet outside jhe property line. (cam N5*t cam, eiEyxisting structures, including: Existing Building footprint(s) with label -.-✓ height(s) Designate existing use(s) and indicate if vacant or currently being used. Pkto 6 j ii. Existing storm drainage facilities (e.g. debn tio n basins, channels, dykes, dams) onCk�ke+o �Zrnf � ar d adjacent to the site 1-6 tP‘IIS/Er.x_i Existing traffic control and mitigation facilities � '' and features such as signalization and signage iv-: Existing fences, barriers and walls a�. Any other miscellaneous structures such as awnings, ramadas, covered parking, etc, that would be present in an aerial photo or survey. 2--9. Other significant conditions on the site, such as major rock outcrops, ravines, hazardous topography, etc, on and adjacent to the site 15 30. Provide the following information for existing private or public streets, right-of way (ROW) adjacent to or within the site: (i ) Right-of-Way width Edge and limits of existing pavement and • striping trewliza, Str,eeLlements such as medians, curbs, Csot da • (sidewalks, and other relevant features iv. Intersecting streets and driveways within one hundred and fifty (150)feet of the project property line or functional access, whichever is greater. 1. Street name Label street as public or private Traffic control and mitigation features such as signalization and signage . Conditions on adjacent land significantly affecting the design of the project such as character and location of adjacent development(s), residential subdivisions, dwellings, etc. 32. The following existing drainage information shall be identified on the concept site plan: Existing drainageways, arroyos, washes, ditches, channels, flow and flood mitigation structures, etc, including their existing condition and functionality t Delineate known flood prone areas Delineate local floodplains with a 100-year discharge greater than or equal to 50 cubic feet per second Delineate sheet flooding areas with 100-year flood depths greater than or equal to 12 inches ( xi. Federally mapped FEMA floodplains and • toAtS C ) floodways 33. The following information regarding existing utilities must be provided: i. The location of water wells -f ii. Water pumping plants µ._ iii. Water reservoirs jv. Indicate by note the direction, distance to, and sizes of water mains and sewer lines intended to service this project (v.;) Show all existing TEP facilities within the development and surroundingproperty and ���,. P P P Y i indicate any possible conflicts with the proposed project. 16 p vi. Existing utility facilities such as yards, stations and appurtenances that would affect the proposed development i1. Existing utility easements Plan Sheet(s) - Proposed Conditions Content The following information on the proposed project must be shown on the drawing or added as notes. This shall include on and off site elements required for the development. 34. All proposed features shall be delineated in a darker line weight than the existing site information 35. If the project is to be phased, provide all necessary information (e.g. r-r. calculations, setbacks, interim drainage, temporary curbing, etc.) to indicate that each phase complies with all requirements as a separate entity. Show and J label any temporary improvements that may be needed to make the site function for each phase as one entity o ff, v ,. s 36. All proposed lot lines. Metes and bounds property line information is not . required on conceptual site plans. Proposed lot lines should be the thickest on ` 'epeAfi, Lot wye$ the plan and differentiated from existing lot lines by line-type. 1 Q7,jf the project has common areas, label each common area individually with a separate letter designation. Enclose with a solid line each area (e.g. common area, private street, etc.). ei 0,) Site Elements - Depict the following information: / i. Proposed fences, barriers and walls along the periphery of the project / ii. All other miscellaneous structures and parking areas associated with the common areas 6 0 Locations and types of proposed monument signs (non-traffic related). 39. Zoning Information — Provide the following information on the plan to indicate conformance with both the Town's Zoning Code and/or any over riding PAD regulations: Y. Graphically depict the building set-back from the property line, with dimensional control ii. Graphically depict the required Bufferyard(s), with dimensional control q-Alerr it";F Ut Hi) Delineate proposed natural open space areas 40. Site Circulation and Street Information: i. Show and label all right-of-way dedications on or abutting the site. If the conceptual site plan has been prepared in conjunction with a subdivision plat or is required as a condition of approval of a review process, such as a rezoning, street dedications in accordance 17 with Oro Valley Town Code Section 7.9 may be required. ii. Should there be any proposed street or alley vacation, provide this information. If vacation has occurred, include the recording information. iii. If new streets are being created, whether public or private, they must be designed in accordance with Town of Oro Valley Subdivision and Streets Standards. Indicate if ' Vi `,. .. streets are to remain private or are to be c!,±,,,,., 4 , ' dedicated to the public. Provide the names of any p P ro osed streets and include limits of street widths, curbs and sidewalks. na t r ay. Proposed sidewalks along abutting right-of- way where required #. v. Depict on-site pedestrian circulation through the common areas. vi. Depict all access roads and any proposed '''''------..%\H • changes to the existing driveways. 41. Conceptual Grading — Provide schematic level concept grading information on _Ahe concept ral site plan. Said information shall consist of: i. ' 1 Locations of graded features such as cut and `�_J fill slopes and retaining walls along the periphery of the project. Also identify the pitch (7, e 7---\ of cut and fill slopes (e.g. 1:1, 2:1, 3:1, etc) Y_, ii. I In lieu of spot elevations for general graded �.,^_ areas, proposed conceptual level contours �✓ may be provided instead iii. The level of grading depicted on this plan should be schematic only and may be 4?4,61AD‘G t i fgAit addressed with approximate proposed I a lor.. . topography. Detailed checking of grade for such items as drainage and International • Residential Code (IRC) compliance will be verified at the Improvement Plan Stage in the permit process 42. Conceptual Drainage - The following minimum proposed drainage and floodplain information must be delineated on every conceptual site plan: e) I. Proposed drainage and erosion mitigation features/structures (e.g. detention basins, culverts, channels, major catch basins and 0ii. storm sewers) o� Graphically identify any proposed changes to existing floodplain(s) 43. Conceptual Traffic—At a minimum, the following proposed traffic control and mitigation information must be delineated on every conceptual site plan: 18 130 `"t ca-0-10/47 i. Delineate any proposed or modified tzk:AS. signalization that corresponds to the traffic statement ii. Delineate proposed off-site road > 21 improvements that correspond to the traffic i t �.,�.. statement Plan Sheet(s)—Conceptual Landscape Plan The following information on the proposed project must be shown on the drawing or added as notes. This shall include on and off site elements required for the development. 44. Show full extent of landscaping, including trees, shrubs, and understory plants. Note: landscaping should be shown by type rather than by specific species on the Conceptual Landscape Plan. The specific species will be shown on the final landscape plan. i. Show all water harvesting basins ii. Dimension and label all required bufferyards iii. Add general notes, as follows: a. Landscape to conform to Oro Valley Landscape Code b. Mitigation of surveyed plants in the Native Plant Preservation Plan will be incorporated into the landscape design c. Shrub locations are preliminary 45. Plants in front yards, buffer yards, and common areas that require irrigation may not be established in areas that are shaped in a manner to not enable partial containment of irrigation or rainwater. Plan Sheets—Site Resources Inventory (SRl)&Native Plant Preservation, Salvage and Mitigation Plan The following information on the proposed project must be shown on the drawing or added as notes. This shall include on and off site elements required for the development. 46. SRI- Identify all Significant Vegetation (SV), as defined in Section 27.6.E of the Zoning Code 47. Native Plant Preservation, Salvage and Mitigation Plan - Provide an inventory of, and specifications for, the proposed treatment of all protected native plants, listed in Addendum C, Table C-1 and Table C-2 of the Zoning Code, which are being disturbed due to development. The inventory shall apply to the entire site. 48. The identification, salvage, and mitigation of protected native plants shall be consistent with the standards and tables found in Section 27.6.E of the Zoning Code. 19 2.3 REQUIRED NOTES General Notes 49. Gross area of development in acres 50. Residential units per acre for residential developments 51. Total miles of new public streets is 52. Total miles of new private streets is 53. List all applicable General Plan, rezoning, conditional use permit (CUP), final plat or annexation conditions impacting the project. Reference associated Oro Valley case number(s) and include any applicable Pima County case numbers. 54. List zoning variances or modifications that are applicable to the project, such as a Board of Adjustment variance or interpretation, or state none. 55. Add the following general note: i. "Assurances for water service, site stabilization and landscaping must be posted prior to the issuance of grading permits" Planning General Notes 56. Provide the maximum allowed building height and the maximum height proposed. 57. If one (1) or more of the following special overlay zones are applicable to the property, add a note stating that the project is designed to meet the specific overlay zone(s) criteria. The note must specify which lots are affected by the overlay zones if there is more than one (1) lot within the site. The zones include the following: i. Tangerine Corridor Overlay District (TRCOD) ii. Oracle Road Scenic Corridor District (ORSCD) iii. Riparian Habitat Protection Overlay District iv. Airport Environs Zone v. Hillside Development Zone (HDZ) vi. Golf Course Overlay Zone 58. If applicable, indicate whether the project meets the specific criteria for the General Plan Significant Resource Areas (SRA) and note which lot(s) are affected by the SRA. 59. If applicable, indicate whether the project meets the criteria outlined in Section 27.10, Environmentally Sensitive Lands (ESL), of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised (OVZCR) and provide a note identifying all impacted lots and a statement that the project is designed to comply with the regulation. 20 60. The following categories and figures must be provided: i. Total amount of open space required and provided ii. Total amount of landscaped common areas iii. Landscaped buffer yards appropriately labeled per OVZCR Table 27.7. Indicate type of bufferyard (A, B, or C) and location iv. Setbacks required and provided 61. For areas designated as common space or open space, specifically indicate ownership, purpose, restrictions, and maintenance responsibilities. 62. Add the following general notes: i. "Existing Zoning is ii. "All signage and lighting to be addressed as part of a separate review and approval process" Engineering General Notes 63. Indicate the design speed and design vehicle to be used in street design. 64. Add the following general notes: i. "All new public roads within and adjacent to this project will be constructed in accordance with approved plans. Separate public improvement and construction plans will be submitted to the Town Engineer's office for review and approval" ii. "Any relocation or modification of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public" Oro Valley Water Utility General Notes 65. Add the following general notes: i. "This development must comply with the Oro Valley Water Utility Specifications Manual during all phases of construction" ii. "This project will be served by Oro Valley Water Utility which has been designated as having an assured 100 year water supply by the Director of Water Resources. Any and all wells must be abandoned per ADWR regulations" iii. "A line extension agreement must be in place prior to any work on the water infrastructure before this project begins" 21 n b iv. "All meters shall have a backflow protection device installed on the customer side of the meter" vi. "All fire services shall have a backflow protection device installed on them" General Utility General Notes 66. If applicable, add the following general note: i. "Should an easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement is to occur prior to issuance of building permits" Golder Ranch Fire General Notes 67. Add the following general notes: i. "Fire hydrants connected to an approved water supply of 1500 GPM for fire protection must be installed and in service prior to combustible material delivery to the site. Temporary construction office trailers are considered combustible material" ii. "Approved fire apparatus access roads must be installed and in service prior to combustible material delivery to the site" iii. "Approved automatic sprinkler systems in new buildings and structures shall be provided throughout all Group A, B, E, F, H, I, M, R, and S occupancies for every facility, building or portion of a building hereafter constructed within or moved into the jurisdiction. Approved automatic sprinkler systems shall be provided throughout all one- and two-family dwellings and townhouses used as model homes with sales or construction offices, and one- and two-family dwellings and townhouses which exceed 3,600 square feet in fire-flow calculation area hereafter constructed within or moved into the jurisdiction" iv. "Temporary street signs must be installed at each street intersection when construction of new roadways allows passage of vehicles. All structures under construction must be clearly identified with an approved address" v. "The installation of traffic control signaling devices and/or electrically operated gates on fire apparatus access roads shall include preemptive control equipment compatible with the fire department's existing system" 22 Parks and Recreation General Notes 68. If applicable, add the following general note: i. "Trail-easement-is a "permanent non- motorized public recreation easement" that is granted to the Town" Permitting Division - Building Codes 69. Add the following general notes: i. "The following codes and standards shall be applicable to this development:" • 2006 International Codes with Local Amendments • 2005 National Electrical Code • 2010 American Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines • 2006 Golder Ranch Fire District Standards and Forms • 2008 Town of Oro Valley Pool Code • 2003 PC/COT Standard Specifications & Details for Public Improvements • 2010 Town of Oro Valley Drainage Criteria Manual • 2004 Town of Oro Valley Subdivision Street Standards and Policies Manual • Town of Oro Valley Zoning Code, Current Revised • Oro Valley Town Code, Current Revised 23 OJpILEYgR :- 3.0 ORO VALLEY CONCEPTUAL MODEL HOME ARCHITECTURE CONTENT otm-m-sA9-1, The Conceptual Architectural Design is one of the two primary elements of the Conceptual Design Review submittal and is a required element of all non-residential as well as subdivision model homes and custom home projects in Oro Valley as specified in the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised. Review of project architecture entails the following two stages: • Conceptual Architectural Design • Final Architectural Design Conceptual Architectural Design must be reviewed by the Conceptual Design Review Board (CDRB) and approved by the Town Council, except for model home architecture and custom homes. Please note that a separate application is required for final architecture. 3.1 Plan Format: Submittals must include printouts on paper no larger than 11"x17". All submittals must be folded to 8 1/2" X 11" and collated. Also, an electronic version of all submittal materials in PDF format are required. 3.2 Plan Content: 10 copies of the following (except as indicated): — Narrative describing how architectural Design Principles (see Section 22.9.D.5) and Design Standards (see Addendum "A") have been met — (2 copies) Color Renderings of all buildings, structures, and elevations clearly depicting overall building composition, facade design elements, (24" x 36" folded to 8 1/2" x 11" in size) — (2 copies) Preliminary Color and Materials Palette for all elevations of all principal and accessory structures and site walls; this shall include roof material, accents, wainscot, etc. Note: Photographs of proposed building materials is required, actual materials (i.e. materials boards) will not be accepted Vignettes of the following: o Overall building composition o Entry building and other structures o Architectural features and facade design elements Building cross sections with floor elevation and heights (including roof, parapet, screening, and architectural features) Site cross sections depicting overall topography in relation to neighboring property and existing grade line 24 (2 copies) Site photographs of the project site and adjacent properties illustrating the relationship between proposed development and adjacent development/properties 8 1/z" x 11" Reduction of all submittal items Submittal will not be accepted if an electronic version of all submittal material in PDF format is not included 25 cee scit?4,p,rme :)7 tosa.k%ra.,e_si ipctixo(iv% cyffpfp-sicr) DRAINAGE MEMO for Ar STONE CANYON BLOCK 1 (OFFSITE WATERSHED) orw ‘14-44E-ti Tucson, Arizona 14 August 2015 PREPARED FOR Stone Mountain Builders LLC 700 East Broadway, Suite 200 Tucson, Arizona 85719 Attn: David Williamson DESCRIPTION A portion of the N.E. Y4 of Section 23, T. 11 S., R. 13 E., G.&S.R.M., Town of Oro Valley, Arizona mL AUG 14 2°15 valiz ....... ..... ...... PREPARED BY j_j CYPRESS CIVIL DEVELOPMENT - _4134 h 111511 '1 Alf "4, Yr artila 4Eri rAtf / !! '11 klq HUNT k-.!; 2102 north country club road, #9 tucson, arizona 85716 N A 520.991.5213 CYPRESS# 15.048 The intent of this Drainage Memo is to discuss the offsite drainage affecting the Stone Canyon — Block 1 Project. There are three (3) existing offsite watersheds that affect the Block 1 Project. The first watershed is 34.88 acres in size and consists of natural desert and golf course north of the project area. In the 100-Year storm event the watershed generates approximately 281 cfs (See attached for watershed calculations and map). The second watershed is 7.7 acres in size and consists of natural desert and golf course north of the project area. In the 100-Year storm event the watershed generates approximately 59.1 cfs (See attached for watershed calculations and map). ..c t„t WY\ iisqv f :a The third watershed is 5.34 acres in size and consists of natural desert and the Stone Canyon Club House north of the project area. In the 100-Year storm event the watershed generates approximately 44.8 cfs(See attached for watershed calculations and map). The total flow entering the Stone Canyon—Block 1 Project is 385 cfs. This drainage will be conveyed through the sit via existing drainage path with two culverts for road crossings. This Memo is to accompany the Conceptual Site Plan for the Stone Canyon — Block 1 Project. The information presented herein provides flow data to support the 404 delineation shown on the Conceptual Site Plan for Stone Canyon — Block 1. This Memo was written utilizing generally accepted engineering practices and all information herein has been researched through archived documents. STONE CANYON - BLOCK 1 OFFSITE WATERSHED MAP / _k N SCALE 1"=200' x \ , r, i . _. \ ---\ \ / , / \ / ----_______,:_____ /st / ,,,,,*ev7;*-- ( \4 \ / __ ,,,-, i, -gh:f--'1*-1'-1\_-:74,4 / OWSI �, /l 34.88 ACRES /4k.,,,?"-. ----,---7 .--0,-,;:--iz--4W,:ls:Tik.;,,,,o / -- / ( \ ,-::..,:: f \ \ .,,,--,t.--„:„..,,I, •.,---,--, A----- --,-' --------' '-_-_:,---,_, j I ) / .1 -, i .-?,„.-.:-::-,..---,-4 -1-,,.:,. :_;_>::-i. / / ,,, - , , , ,, , k N ' r:Air.,-: ,,,,t,_ ;.,t2., ,4 l // OWS2 / .-,. �- f\ X.7OACRES `� ( / \ , W-- / \ \..... 7--- � ` goo � - , ----."1:;„:„.=_;__, N'N. ,,‘,,,„ ,\N � -----...A,. C;‹,\ (-1 /44 Kh_) ` _{ R ` \ ` V r N. 0- (�-" \ N� OWS f 5.34 ACR E <` c,„, „,,,,, . 1 0/ \\. ' '4,,,'--,--,!.--4-. ,-..i-A.s., ---, iu ----, ..,,,, ,. , 4 z ` - ,� , : ,, , - v-s,\ ,, CA.....s ....... „, , ,,,,,„„,_,. PIMA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL HYDROLOGIC DATA SHEET FOR PIMA COUNTY FLOOD PEAK PROCEDURE Generated using methonds provided by Pima County Regional Flood Control District Client: Terramar Properties Prepared by: Greg Bennett Project Name: Stone Canyon Block 1 Date: 07/10/2015 Concentration Point: OS1 Job # 15.048 Watershed Area: 34.88 Acres Watershed Type Undeveloped-Foothills Watercourse Data By Reach Reach No. Height (Hi) Length (Li) Slope (Si) Basin Factor (Nb) 1 130 1950 0.0667 0.035 Length of Watercourse (Lc): 1950 feet Mean Slope: 0.0667 Length to Cen. of Gravity (Lca): 975 feet Weighted Basin Fac: 0.035 Veg. Cover Type(s): Urban Lawns Veg. Cover Density: 5 RETURN PERIOD: 100-years Rainfall Depths: NOAA Atlas 14 (90% UCL) @ Latitude: 32.4668 Longitude: -110.9823 Duration: 5-min 10-min 15-min 30-min 1-hr 2-hr 3-hr 6-hr 12-hr 24-hr Point Values (in): 0.89 1.35 1.67 2.25 2.79 3.11 3.28 3.61 3.95 4.7 Soil Type Percent Curve # (CN) Adj. Curve # (CN*) Runoff Coef. (C) B - - - - C - - - - D 100 91 93.37 0.748 Imp. 0 99 99 0.958 • Weighted Runoff Coef. (Cw): 0.748 Lesser Return Periods Time of Concentration: 5 min Return Period Ratio Qpeak Rainfall Intensity (i) @ Tc: 10.68 in/hr 2-year NaN Runoff Supply Rate (q) @ Tc: 7.99 in/hr 5-year NaN PEAK DISCHARGE: 281 cfs 10-year NaN 25-year NaN 50-year NaN ,A% i/, Rl. PIMA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL HYDROLOGIC DATA SHEET FOR PIMA COUNTY FLOOD PEAK PROCEDURE Generated using methonds provided by Pima County Regional Flood Control District Client: Terramar Properties Prepared by: Greg Bennett Project Name: Stone Canyon Block 1 Date: 07/10/2015 Concentration Point: 0S2 Job # 15.048 Watershed Area: 7.7 Acres Watershed Type Undeveloped-Foothills Watercourse Data By Reach Reach No. Height (Hi) Length (Li) Slope (Si) Basin Factor (Nb) 1 29 1300 0.0223 0.035 Length of Watercourse (Lc): 1300 feet Mean Slope: 0.0223 Length to Cen. of Gravity (Lca): 650 feet Weighted Basin Fac: 0.035 Veg. Cover Type(s): Urban Lawns Veg. Cover Density: 30 RETURN PERIOD: 100-years Rainfall Depths: NOAA Atlas 14 (90% UCL) @ Latitude: 32.4668 Longitude: -110.9823 Duration: 5-min 10-min 15-min 30-min 1-hr 2-hr 3-hr 6-hr 12-hr 24-hr Point Values (in): 0.89 1.35 1.67 2.25 2.79 3.11 3.28 3.61 3.95 4.7 Soil Type Percent Curve # (CN) Adj. Curve # (CN*) Runoff Coef. (C) B - - - - C - - - - D 100 90 92.56 0.722 Imp. 0 99 99 0.958 Weighted Runoff Coef. (Cw): 0.722 Lesser Return Periods Time of Concentration: 5.1 min Return Period Ratio Qpeak Rainfall Intensity (i) @ Tc: 10.56 in/hr 2-year NaN Runoff Supply Rate (q) @ Tc: 7.62 in/hr 5-year NaN PEAK DISCHARGE: 59.1 cfs 10-year NaN 25-year NaN 50-year NaN MOH I I*ALI PIMA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL HYDROLOGIC DATA SHEET FOR PIMA COUNTY FLOOD PEAK PROCEDURE Generated using methonds provided by Pima County Regional Flood Control District Client: Terramar Properties Prepared by: Greg Bennett Project Name: Stone Canyon Block 1 Date: 07/10/2015 Concentration Point: 0S3 Job # 15.048 Watershed Area: 5.34 Acres Watershed Type Undeveloped-Foothills Watercourse Data By Reach Reach No. Height (Hi) Length (Li) Slope (Si) Basin Factor (Nb) 1 20 710 0.0282 0.035 Length of Watercourse (Lc): 710 feet Mean Slope: 0.0282 Length to Cen. of Gravity (Lca): 355 feet Weighted Basin Fac: 0.035 Veg. Cover Type(s): Desert Brush Veg. Cover Density: 10 RETURN PERIOD: 100-years Rainfall Depths: NOAA Atlas 14 (90% UCL) @ Latitude: 32.4668 Longitude: -110.9823 Duration: 5-min 10-min 15-min 30-min 1-hr 2-hr 3-hr 6-hr 12-hr 24-hr Point Values (in): 0.89 1.35 1.67 2.25 2.79 3.11 3.28 3.61 3.95 4.7 Soil Type Percent Curve # (CN) Adj. Curve # (CN*) Runoff Coef. (C) B - - - - C - - - - D 100 92 94.03 0.771 Imp. 5 99 99 0.958 Weighted Runoff Coef. (Cw): 0.78 Lesser Return Periods Time of Concentration: 5 min Return Period Ratio Qpeak Rainfall Intensity (i) @ Tc: 10.68 in/hr 2-year NaN Runoff Supply Rate (q) @ Tc: 8.33 in/hr 5-year NaN PEAK DISCHARGE: 44.8 cfs 10-year NaN 25-year NaN 50-year NaN