Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
OV1501011
Board/Commission/Town Council Notice Form OV Number: DJJ \ Dl ) Board/Commission: ( b1?13 Date of Meeting: LP/ 0 1 ) L 15 Day Notice Deadline: S J3l )/L Publish in Daily Territorial Newspaper: Submission Deadline: Ad in OV File: Emailed to DT: Cost of Publishin • Publish Date: Publishing No: Publishing Placed in Folder: Affidavit of Public 'on: Town Clerks Copy Folder Postcard Notification Boundary: Notification Feet: Total Residents: Spreadsheet placed in Folder: Date Mailed out: HOA's Notification: 014-P(\)-e-d Total HOA's: Date Mailed out: 5/ �7 Property Posting: //4 Gave to Inspectors: AJ/4-- Town Posting: Date Posted: 5/D7 Town Website Posting: yeLv Date Posted: 5137 Notice Map Placed in OV Folder: w_„„.,.,..„---.:,,,,,,, .i.„,,,,c,'„';,. - ."lir... — ', 11.141 Illi IdiVioA'1114 , mk,- k ;„,,,,,''• , „....4 ain ''''''' , ' ,,,--..,•••* , 7-- 'y' „,".!.',I'- '''.4.$,* 7.41)*0414Pa.4.6,. •'‘' i .?-.1.---,' *i . '• 0.19.1$ tiro i$ , 47 .0, tt, -0; a • Ail q x',.. ,, ",..,,,,,.,:i„ ..,„, .ir ,.." 65'.),‘.,,,.,-;..11‘114.414„ 110,4111.,',,,,it L w ,' '''''' egg }.� `W6 µ x IN H� y 4 '-- A r' Elr * `,w L'°gyp, ry ,. a«� I. w e . V ,Y ,.. Y mo1 , f ,a • ® a"" � xPi � Ti ` #` —.' 4 .n�'� 1„i� + ' Aims Y, : ,iX � f" pAr g x � ""A A S w a , ,, 7 ,. . , ?, .f a y�� a ;xA;. ! 4y n x ‘ R,°�" g1Y"� ��' Y-yuP " �.. . ." .........4....t fit,!f." i-t"�% 1 „„•r.: ' :! ,p, avf R.. � x „� , t M a a a x.1 , . x. ,, 1 ' ,A• `'" s" wf9x""# y '�P' m iiii \ fn. � x� ra .,- / �,.,., t '. PI• , .,, rin.,rr,1".4,,4, .''"'''''." riplk'''' "''," $0,, 4'.... l'....'.1 l'. i o.n o;a .^m;M�, ,a ' da 0 yx a • ,.,� ��� d-�w :y r. xi•t • � � a saR, . f„ (j Y , lay Y :. mwY ;r w« S ai f x::; ^'r' tg aU�' , i+f scs � t yy/C ai +�, � r ° g "iti , <=s aRj j e a � 84 illqf g� Y V C W ell al .41111 ., ;', ,,,,....., 11L1r.,,.. ,,,IICO:'' ' '''''---.1'' Irli:4:' •,—ter i '.. pi ' il . 6,11 , ' �.yit ., , .,,,,, _ - , gym. , N WEE OV914-001 600 FEET NOTICE AREA s NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW BOARD The Conceptual Design Review Board invites the community to attend a public meeting on Tuesday, June 14, 2016, 6 p.m. Oro Valley Town Council Chambers, 11000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley, Arizona Proposed Conceptual Architecture for Tucson Koi and Water Gardens, located on the east side of Oracle Road, approximately '/-mile south of Magee Road, OV1501011. The public is encouraged to attend and will be invited to speak. An agenda for this meeting will be made available at least 24 hours prior to the meeting time and can be viewed at www.orovalleyaz.gov. For questions and additional information, please contact Michael Spaeth, Senior Planner, at (520) 229-4812 or mspaeth(c�oroval leyaz.gov. POSTED: 05/27/2016 TIME: 3:00 PM BY: rmf XOPO iik Conceptual Architecture Conceptual Design Review Board Staff Report OUMDED y91 PROJECT: Tucson Koi &Water Gardens CASE NUMBER: OV1501011 MEETING DATE: June 14, 2016 AGENDA ITEM: 4 STAFF CONTACT: Michael Spaeth, Senior Planner mspaeth©orovalleyaz.gov (520) 229-4812 Applicant: Daniel Tessone, Tucson Koi & Water Gardens Request: Conceptual Architecture Location: East side of Oracle Road, approximately '/-mile south of Magee Road Recommendation: Recommend approval of the requested Conceptual Architecture SUMMARY: The purpose of this request is to consider Conceptual Architecture (Attachment 1) for the Tucson Koi & Water Gardens store proposed on the east side of Oracle Road, approximately 1/4-mile south of Magee Road (see Location Map - Attachment 2). The Final Site Plan (Attachment 3) for the proposed store has been previously approved which includes the following elements: • One approximately 1,800 sq. ft. store/showroom • Walking trails and shaded seating throughout the nursery • Koi pond for sale of fish • Plant loading area • Vehicle/Pedestrian bridge spanning the existing wash that bisects the property • Parking The proposed architecture represents a modern southwest design that incorporates desert colors and elements. The architecture features predominantly earth tone colors with rusted metal roof, split face masonry block accents and a prominent tower element. The proposed architecture has been reviewed and is in conformance with the Design Principles and applicable Design Standards and staff is recommending approval. OV1501011 Tucson Koi& Water Gardens Conceptual Architecture Page 2 of 4 Conceptual Design Review Board Staff Report BACKGROUND: Existing Site Conditions • 2.8 acres • Zoning: C-N (Neighborhood Commercial) • Vacant Proposed Improvements • 1,800 sq. ft. building/showroom • Design: modern southwest style architecture Approvals to Date • 2014: Rezoning approved from R-S (Residential Services) to C-N (Neighborhood Commercial) • 2016: Final Site Plan, Landscape and Irrigation Plan, and Rainwater Harvesting Plan approved. DISCUSSION / ANALYSIS: The following is a list of the applicable Design Principles (in italics)followed by staff commentary. Conceptual Architectural Design Review Principles-Zoning Code Section 22.9.D.5.b • Section 22.9.D.5.b.i: "Design:building architectural design shall be appropriate for the climate and characteristics of the Sonoran Desert, including indigenous and traditional textures, colors, and shapes found in and around Oro Valley. All development shall maintain and strengthen the high quality of design exemplified in Oro Valley through project creativity and design excellence." The proposed architecture represents a modern southwest style that incorporates desert tones, hues and materials. Specifically, the predominant external stucco material will be painted a deep earth tone color with various accent materials including split-face masonry block, rusted metal roofing and shade sail canopies. Secondarily, the design incorporates "roll-up" doors, oriented north and south, which create a breezeway during operating hours, a feature appropriate for the Sonoran Desert climate. Lastly, the design utilizes sleek modern lines with varying roof planes, including a prominent tower feature, which will provide visual interest from Oracle Road. OV1501011 Tucson Koi & Water Gardens Conceptual Architecture Page 3 of 4 Conceptual Design Review Board Staff Report • Section 22.9.D.5.b.ii: "Scale, Height, and Mass: building scale, height and mass shall be consistent with the Town-approved intensity of the site, designated scenic corridors, and valued mountain views. Buildings shall be designed to respect the scale of adjoining areas and should mitigate the negative and functional impacts that arise from scale, bulk and mass." The height and mass of the proposed building are appropriate to the area and will result in an appropriately scaled development. The proposed building height (18 feet) is compatible with the adjacent commercial development. Furthermore, the subject property sits slightly lower than the commercial development to the north and residential development to the east, further reducing any potential visual impacts. Additionally, though the property is not officially within the Oracle Road Scenic Corridor Overlay District (ORSCOD), the site is in a highly visible location that could have an impact on the mountain views to the east. The proposed architecture takes this into account by limiting the building height to 18 feet and using predominantly earth tones and colors, both of which will help limit the impact on existing view corridors. • Section 22.9.D.5.b.iii: "Façade Articulation: all building facades shall be fully articulated, including variation in building massing, roof planes, wall planes, and surface articulation. Architectural elements including, but not limited to, overhangs, trellises, projections, awnings, insets, material, and texture shall be used to create visual interest that contributes to a building's character." The proposed architecture provides significant façade articulation through the use of several elements, including: • Varied roof and wall planes • Tower features • Roof cornicing • Window "eyelets" • Varied materials, including masonry block and rusted metal • Shade sail canopies • Section 22.9.D.5.b.vi: "Screening: building design and screening strategies shall be implemented to conceal the view of loading areas, refuse containers, mechanical equipment, appurtenances, and utilities from adjacent public streets and neighborhoods." The proposed refuse collection areas and plant storage facilities will all be enclosed within architecturally consistent screen walls and fencing. These areas will not be visible from adjacent roadways or residential developments. Design Standards Analysis The proposed models are in conformance with the Design Standards by providing significant façade articulation, roofline variation, a varied color and material palette, OV1501011 Tucson Koi & Water Gardens Conceptual Architecture Page 4 of 4 Conceptual Design Review Board Staff Report surface articulations and design elements which are consistent with the modern southwest style architecture. CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION: The proposed architecture incorporates elements of modern southwest style architecture which is compatible with the surrounding area. The proposed architecture is in conformance with the Zoning Code including Design Principles and applicable Design Standards. It is recommended that the Conceptual Design Review Board take the following action: Recommend approval of the requested Conceptual Architecture to Town Council. SUGGESTED MOTIONS: I move to recommend approval based on the finding that the request is in conformance with the Design Principles and Design Standards in the Zoning Code. OR I move to recommend denial of the Conceptual Architecture, finding it does not meet ATTACHMENTS: 1. Application 2. Location Map 3. Approved Final Site Plan Bayer Vella, ATOP Planning Manager n ' w ; Fli all _« , : �a .^ x�rMw�a e �. LA rig".,,,41' •,. , ' ,:-.,,.;,„:1,,-•!,:•. • .1,,,,,, :,„.:.7.,:::4: , ! � � Magee Road " . e :,',9, : ' ' ' "" . ' -,..;''''"'''' '''''' .' . i ';:r .;ywd fi , " ".„# ye .a•'• j i. "$ � ; / r,. ,,,,ii, i .ra „.�,d' �; „ ' i :''' ,„ x a 44 Ltd 91N .� R'", a yy, , 1 ,,„,, , . „,,..',,,, , ,,,,,—""""' 4'4,4*,:,;',:, ;,..„,„„. , w«; I t Property Subject k a t I «M i a' .•^' :�., , .. "yjry . '� "' ***.' i ,,,, 9� W w M d � •p: �J�,tY ._q!9/,?p LOCATION MAP j``9 TUCSON KOI & WATER GARDENS (OV 1501011) ae °L` DEt� � �� Attachment 2 Board/Commission/Town Council Notice Form OV Number: (\J 1 CJD) Di Board/Commission: 1 Date of Meeting: —1 I �..P 9 l Day Notice 15 N i Deadline: Lf2 ( �lii b Publish in Daily Territorial Newspaper: qe-') Submission Deadline: /1 ro Ad i IV Fi e: Emailed to DT: Cos of Publishi : Publish ate: Publishing o: Publishin Plac in OV Folder: Affidavit of ublication: Town Clerks Copy Folder Postcard Notification Boundary: Notification Feet: Total Residents: / Spreadsheet place older: Date Mailed out: HOA's Notification: Total HOA's: c)t Date Mailed out: c 1 17 I O Ito Property Posting: Gave to Inspectors: , Town Posting: ES Date Posted: Town Website Posting: Date Posted: Notice Map Placed in OV Folder: NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING TOWN COUNCIL The Town Council invites the community to attend a public meeting on Wednesday, July 6, 2016, 6 p.m. Oro Valley Town Council Chambers, 11000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley, Arizona Proposed Conceptual Architecture for Tucson Koi and Water Gardens, located on the east side of Oracle Road, approximately '/-mile south of Magee Road, OV1501011. The public is encouraged to attend and will be invited to speak. An agenda for this meeting will be made available at least 24 hours prior to the meeting time and can be viewed at www.orovalleyaz.gov. For questions and additional information, please contact Michael Spaeth, Senior Planner, at (520) 229-4812 or mspaeth©orovalleyaz.gov. POSTED: 06/20/2016 TIME: 10:00 am BY: rmf li r NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING Oro Valley Town Council The Oro valley Town Council will hold a public meeting on Wednesday, July 6, 2016, 6 p.m. Oro Valley Town Hall, 11000 N. La Canada Dr. Oro Valley, Arizona Conceptual Public Art for the Kneaders Bakery & Cafe, located north of the northeast corner of Linda Vista and Oracle Road (OV1601150). Proposed Conceptual Architecture for Tucson Koi and Water Gardens, located on the east side of Oracle Road, approximately '/-mile south of Magee Road, OV1501011 . Conceptual Architecture for Native Grill and Wings, a proposed restaurant to be located in the Steam Pump Village Center, at 11107 North Oracle Road, OV1600903. Public Hearing: Request for approval of a Conditional Use Permit for a drive-thru Freddy's Steakburger located in the Steam Pump Village Center, at 11143 North Oracle Road, OV1600904. Conceptual Site Plan and Conceptual Architecture for proposed Freddy's Steakburger, located in the Steam Pump Village Center, at 11143 North Oracle Road, OV 1600904. The meeting will be in the Town Council Chambers. The public is encouraged to attend and will be invited to speak. An agenda for this meeting will be made available at least 24 hours prior to meeting time and can be viewed at www.orovalleyaz.qov. For questions and additional information, please contact Chad Daines, Principal Planner, at (520) 229-4896 or cdaines©orovalleyaz.gov. Posted: 06/20/2016 Time: 10 am By: rmf OQO�y AR/?O29 °UNDED Development and Infrastructure Services July 6, 2016 Daniel Tessone Tucson Koi & Cactus 3320 E. Allen Road Tucson, AZ 85718 Email: designmyyard(a�outlook.com Subject: Town Council Action Letter Tucson Koi & Cactus Conceptual Architecture, OV1501011. Dear Daniel, The Town Council at their regularly scheduled meeting of July 6, 2016, voted to approve the above request. You may now submit the Final Architecture package (see attached process guide). If you have any questions, please contact me at (520) 229-4812 or m spaeth©oroval leyaz.gov. Best Regards, ift4ild Michael Spaeth, AiCP Senior Planner 520-229-4812 m spaeth(a�oroval leyaz.gov cc: File Planning Permitting Inspection&Compliance Engineering Operations Transit (520)229-4821 (520)229-481 5 (520)229-4815 (520)229-4894 (520)229-5070 (520)229-4990 Caring for our heritage, our community, our future. 11000 N.La Canada Drive•Oro Valley,Arizona 85737 • Flte O O. 4OVNDED Town of Oro Valley Development and Infrastructure Services Department September 13, 2016 Rhonda Rawson Daniel Tessone ADC Inc. Tucson Koi & Cactus P.O. Box 13152 3320 E. Allen Road Tucson, AZ 85732 Tucson, AZ 85718 via email: rr2233@comcast.net via email: desiqnmyyard@outlook.com Re: Final Architecture for Tucson Koi &Water Gardens, OV1501011. Thank you for your submittal for the abovementioned project. Based on the submittal, staff offers the following comments. Final Architecture 1. Planning staff has no additional comments. The Final Architecture is approved. Conceptual Public Art 2. As a reminder, the project will need to meet the Town of Oro Valley Public Art requirements. As discussed, installation of Public Art is required prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. To avoid delay, this process needs to be started as soon as possible. As a generalized timeframe, the review and approval process can take between 4-6 months. We look forward to continuing to work with you toward successful completion of your project. Should you have any questions, please contact me at(520) 229-4812. Sincerely, Michael Spaeth, AICP Senior Planner Town of Oro Valley 520.229.4812 mspaeth@orovalleyaz.gov cc: Lee Goldberg (leerandallgoldberg@gmail.com) Oro Valley, it's in our nature. 11000 N.La Canada Drive Oro Valley,Arizona 85737 www.orovalleyaz.gov phone:(520)229-4800 I fax:(520)742-1022 commercial 95 . ,,, Synthis Polymer Fabrics Architectural Shade Cloth • Heavy duty.professional grade architectural shade fabric for sp.t" NahHip,tthlmttt..t.. ws.d(ham'', at catch.*A wJ4 tensioned structures and other shade applications. pu•wu.d.m..th ad.. ':. g orw.G.y t+.vlamat.m .. • Made from UV stabilized HDPE monofilament and tape yarns. 't""° ' • Specialized lock stitch knit for more air movement and better "47' channeling of cooling breezeways. • Constructed to block up to 98.8%of harmful UV sun rays. (� • Heat set for ease of fabrication and to limit shrinkage. . . �''J • Tear resistant and will not crack,rot or fade. • 10 year manufacturer's warranty against UV degradation. AP • Recyclable. Synthesis - rt. COLOR CHOICE COLOR CHOICE Fabric Color Options #2 #3 COLOR CHOICE #1 Natural Desert Sand Yellow Cayenne Deep Ochre #445003 #444983 #445072 #445058 #444990 Cherry Red Charcoal Steel Grey Navy Blue Turquoise #444976 #444969 #445041 #445010 #445065 III1. Iti: Aquatic Blue Sky Blue Rivergum Brunswick Green Black #444938 #445034 #445027 #444952 #444945 Colors are representative only. Small variations in color should be anticipated and are within commercial tolerances. Synthesis*and Commercial 9r are registered trademarks of Gale Pacific Limited. All rights-reserved. i SLIDING PATIO DOORS—MULTI-TRACK DOORS Built-in pockets house optional 4 `� supports to y withstand highest r': +* I` wind zones t. 9 } ,, it ,- .: a I; d ..„:„.„,,4,,,,„,..„..i . ._ , , „„,.„,..,,,,..4,,,.,..,,,,,„7„,........„. . .„ .„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,„..,. . .„ . . „, „.„... ..„ , f •` Heavy dutystainless steel Two and three-track 5 ,�a' : "" tandem rolers provide systems available for ' " smooth,effortless and multi-slide R . „. long-lasting operation Prr,,,. '''4.,-. -' i ? x Premium Aluminum sliding patio doors from JELD-WEN°frame the natural beauty of the environment while keeping the harsh elements where they belong—outside.For beautiful and reliable aluminum patio doors that withstand the rigors of any climate—hot or cold,wet or dry,choose JELD-WEN. : Standard Features Optional Features • Color.White,Clear Anodized,Bronze Anodized • Frame.8-3/16"for 3-track systems • 6'box frame for 2-track system • Glass options include 1°clear insulating tempered • 1'Low-E insulating tempered glass Low-E,tempered tinted,tempered obscure .f , • High-quality weatherstrip for a tighter seal • Grilles between the glass(GOG)available with 5/8°flat or 1'contour grilles . ,# • Dual-point mortise lock for increased security SI,I • Color matching handle set • Deluxe fiberglass Charcoal insect screens with frames that match color of unit` o;.. • Heavy duty stainless steel tandem rollers with precision bearing for effortless operation 'Insect screens are intended to allow air and light in while keeping insects out.They are not intended tol stop children from Ila27 falling through an open door or window For safety screens or other security devices,contact your local building supply retailer 1...D RUSTS i7 '�►-,q=6 Q METAL. CLAn M�CLAfl T.o.P; Q BY. PARAPET - =6 0 N PARAPET = T.O.P. - Q Ce Q 1111 i SAIL U W >�- SAIL CLOTH ()ZS U W :LOTH II ii ri O 4 g Q Sy �= zz0 a - O '''''P)14‘) Now �FE GAB I ON WALL VI/ 16'x 12' GARAGE 3,OOR MASONRY COLUMNS: D N METAL SI GNAGE ABOVE GLASS DOORS OPTIONS: SPLIT PAGE BLOCK I I--SOUTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION 1/8'=1'-O' -or_ 1/8'4-0' I6 x8 x4 CMU VERT I GAL JOINTS PLUSH HORIZONTAL JOINTS RAKE1; la'-6"e RUSTEr, 0 T.O.P. METAL GLAD Zia.. I6-6 MIN Ill= T.O.P. � y PARAPE; UMT III II UJ III ... SAIL Z 00 tofl SAIL CLOTH CLOTH N MIMI MINI LV/ ; 4 I MN M■ MEI dill t , w ci) „ tz _ .... c) u .- - ..., .... II N. C III= NM SAIL PPE :t' APPROVED BY:TC/PZ/DRB/BOA 0 CLOTH a WEST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION --5' w 1/- /3, Z tl( Cl) C' 1/8'4—01 1/8A4—O' Ver-1"..... /14 - jpi 1 PZ PROJECT MANAGER COLORS _ RUSTED METAL MATERIAL LIST-EACH ELEVATION: DATE: 07/07/15 MAIN SU I LL7I NG COLOR CLA : SPLIT PACE I. STUCCO (PA I NTEfl) flUNN E1,VVARi7 SAIL CANOPY _ MASONRY BLOCK 2. METAL GLAD PARAPETS flE62 I'1-ANC I ENT EARTH DEEP OCHRE S. SPLIT FACE MASONRY BLOCK LSV I S = 4. GLASS COLORED ANOr;I zE17 = ELEVATIONS VAII NI,OVAIS 1=RAMES (BRONZE) s e ;;.�rw K .-a. ai! tF Wit- V. -.. Igo , r r4 r'z,,„,,Y*:r'' . ''.,. tY, 4 -:,i;'.*' ' - -,,..,,ww_-44 , -....;. � .Y R y .. 0 N — Ob., 1.4"jam" x s•: `'+ t W " 06' e:. lego g ___, '• . 44'-'443 --t-: it ' . . -4* ...:, S1 f iF 41, _. - O , ..:41,' .' rni 7-p r' . .:.ei#:,...:_.r....i...*;,„,„::;,„:......,,,, ,,_:,- .;,..: 0 > :.: .,. , .„4., ,„:: . ... _. :., ,..„..,, ,,,_ .„)::4,..,:..,.....„.„,,,,.., 4 AN . , z 1. 0 is -._,, r .'•:Wi O z M .. F c MAIN STRUCTURE COLG',: M/A SONRY CO UMNS METAL DETAOLS GAi,1:OON WAL-S DUNN EDWARDS DE 6217 SPLIT FACE MASONRY METAL PANELS RIVER ROCK IN RUSTED 0 ANCIENT EARTH NATURAL GREY RUSTED METAL METAL GAMBION CAGESigiC CC co E Z % ice Z � i 'a , 0 °3 k° E . '''. SLIDING PATIO DOORS-MULTI -� t '� .�i N ono a LU ° • ..,*...j Tr 4 ,. -K - Tr c I �� i I v ,-,,c, -- . ' Q Ct it - t di M f v./ �' StanEare Features yrul T. Fe ai W 1 j r ( t1L" ''r il<'77:;. ,,:,'.t4.4:::::::','.... .''''',;:.,.0 . ;;.Y ,*,.,. _;,,, i''‘'' .11r#wwJ.r.'•.-, Y..: 1,V. WBO\II O>OW FRAME COLGR° OVERHEAD DOOR (S L E ONLY- DATE: 07/07/15 ROOF COLOR: COLOR ANODIZE* E RONZE) SR 0 N ZE ANODIZED ALUMINUM COLOR & MATERIAL DUNN EDWARDS DEC 7., OYSTER PALETTE • a s- O ,- O ,- O 1- p Via` -§Cr -per lb"i 191-0" 1 ( L ENINNIE MEW 1 I it OP - - y I' •,..; C114 �• 1 ;;-,,,, -lif itd 00 •� I q r ,...„.....- -1 I ::-,.., ?. 2 140 _. ..: .... ►; ,.. ....0. f-.. Z , '• • .,, . 'j ' r t .,�:i t O • I CO M A 91 I. ® H h A i Irti ,... ..-..1 g 1 i-- ii --) ...., ,:......, ,:__,, -.4 ::: 1 0 .... L__ m _ - ,.. 1 ,, 54 -; 11 Di xl] ,.::1 ' Ij 'ig ii 0 71 i3-% :1 1 QD nr 0 !°1-4'1! t t` 'A)(s` :.-: x 40u i41;104 E: T 6 71iiiii; tItna5 XII l II{ ' '1Ai U Ei ,....... 1 .:-: (._______ _ ) (--- - -- i I i-- - -A ,, ,,,, 1 _i _ 6 .- ,00, CO gi . . !giiil fla j :gi�u� t..c i ;-1 i o rn SOUTHWEST ENGINEERING TUCSON KOI & CACTUS o . . 0 1670 N. KOLB RD. #144ROAD 7776 N. ORACLE o T UCSON, AZ 85 715 CO Phone (520) 615-7786 ORO VALLEY, AZ 1 cr c,al-)vn>>ni crpnrrr.c.Orrmai1 r'nrr► r ir C ii ROOF COLOR - (TYPICAL ALL ROOFS) a 1 DUNN EDWARD DEG148-OYSTER Q LRv 62 ---1 b Ce 4 U W 06 .(....i i ROOF O , SCUPPER 1 ■ - 0 MIN SLOPE: Z ,AIL ' 3/8" PER FOOT O Z C -ANOPY (f) lD SELOW MIN SLOPE: >..< >,'< MIN SLOPE: U r 3/8" PER FOOT 3/8" PER FOOT n N 2'x2' 2'x2' MI '„_ N SKYLT SKYLT SAIL CANOPY BELOW 3-PLY B.U. ROOF I N6 OVER PLYWOOD SHEATH I N6 SEE FRAM I N6 PLAN AND DRAWI N6 SI-O Z V W � � r Z , Z c4 , 0 c: 00 4 >�< >�< ' IN 2'x2' 2'x2' W `� C SKYLT SKYLT C Al CO W ° ( k c, L.) $ N. ( 4c, E--, 4 likilli6k. E ROOF TOP EQUIPMENT ' 0 BELOW PARAPET ELEVATION itY R PIPLAN 3/16'=1'-0' DATE: 07/07, ROOF PLA J v / Q t) 0M Q Ce Q w � � J W U J H J O Q O > Z ' O O Z oC flEPRESSEn EXISTIN --\G LAN17SG�4PE ~ N AREAPROPOSED SUI Ltd I NG 5UILi7ING 1s-6 L--, J I T.O.P. EXT`G KOI EXISTING OPI=ICE SHOPPING CENTER SL17G i.0 T.O.G. FFE_2581.8s POND ---)1 .._ FPE 2s8-r.2s, I PLAT 171 SPLAY 8 4.0 SERVIC R I VE 0 EXT'G Sb.S TOE Z DC co E W,�LL 24' SOUTH DRIVE ESTIMATEfl 100 YR NORTH W `o R c It FL00Z7PLAIN LIMITS t. Z —I �` �- i(j 1 '- EROSION 0 °0 HARZAR17 SETSAC K Z @ W $ - a ° � co Q S "--- : S' ICTTON0- F. F. V3O 9 0.' O R ci) J9"--1 DATE: 07/07/15 SSTE SECS DON trellatm SITE WALL AND HARDSCAPE KEY NOTES: Ii ^ A: Proposed building with stucco and split face block walls. K) B: Rust patina metal roof panels. L . C: Clear story windows. /- , D: Perforated metal panels on gabion wall. ``' 1-�., '� 7\ E: Rust finish corrugated metal and slatted 71. **"-\ 1_\,,47 , , S 4 ► ' 4 _ metal panel rail fencing. .1 rt G: Landscape plant material. j SI\ " .fr4t"')\N-r 1--\ H: Existing natural vegetation. . J: Metal bridge with perforated and slatted metal panels- , K: Sail shade canopy. g r-qc ..I L: Rust finish corrugated metal fencing. M: Metal lattice canopy beyond. Oracle Road Elevation of North Side of Project N: Rusted patina slatted metal panels. M ov fJ-r'S.11•1 S _ 1 4 l l s e l f 1 i /' i-t=_-oP A . . , @..c... 6).\.L...._____,),,-,‘„....i. - - r '' 11 • i An 11 . - I . N . . . 1, ...,._., , . i a l t --1 1 p likitiliht.P11 a:- ` +Ml..'- '+ -" ill= .c�+Ma_r"� - If_.' .._. � �{j� it i` i':• _ y # r �pY' p' e }it:i yam; M�. 7-, t .. it ,- ' •Irot }` t 11'1 ' T. , , frni M. ' 2 - - - Mil .. .Ilia f I 2 0 • fir...• ,,. et _ , _ _ OracleRoad Elevation of South and Center of Project Road Elevation Tucson Koi & Cactus Oracle t NOTICE FORM CHECKLIST OV Number: DV)5 Di DI 1 Meeting Name & Date: C OIL g - 12-1 i Application Type: Wlicu,o fv a.,,( P Lth ( � C ar4- 15-day Notice DEADLINE: 20 "I 1 Publish in Daily Territorial? Yes No Day of Publishing: 2pm submission deadline: Date/Tim e i ed: Publishing#: Cost: Paper copy (attache : Scanned to OV file: Affidavirscanned to OV file: Original to Town Clerk: HOA Notification? No All (Affected , ,T tal: t HOAs: i ate mailed out: Notification Boundary? Yes N - Notification radius: feet---Spreadsheet into file: Total resident • _,. Date mailed out: Property Posting? Yes Vo Stickers given to Planner: (1 ( a_-- Posting on Town property Yes No Date posted: K/2S'I -] �j Post on Planning Page? Yes No Date posted: ( IS I Notes: - _. kOVNDED AS" Town of Oro Valley Community Development and Public Works TOWN OF ORO VALLEY NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW BOARD The Conceptual Design Review Board will hold a public meeting on Tuesday, September 12, 2017, 6 p.m. Oro Valley Town Council Chambers 11000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley, Arizona Discussion and possible action regarding proposed Conceptual Public Art for Tucson Cactus & Koi, located on the east side of Oracle Rd. approximately a %-mile south of Magee Rd. (0V1501011). The meeting will be held in the Town Council Chambers. The public is encouraged to attend and will be invited to speak. For more information about the project, please visit www.OVprojects.com. An agenda for this meeting will be made available online at least 24 hours prior to meeting time. For questions and additional information, please contact Milini Simms, Planner at (520) 229-4836 or msimms@orovalleyaz.gov. POSTED: 8/25/2017 TIME: 11:00 a.m. BY: jma Oro Valley, it's in our nature. 11000 N. La Canada Drive,Oro Valley,Arizona 85737 www.orovalleyaz.gov I phone:(520)229-4800 I fax: (520)742-1022 omr--BEY qR1/4"t P°UNDED 19:a Community Development and Public Works May 4, 2018 Daniel Tassone Tucson Cactus & Koi Co. 10645 N. Oracle Rd. STE 121 Oro Valley, AZ 85737 designmward c(�outlook.com Re: Final Public Art Tucson Cactus and Koi 7810 N. Oracle Road Approval, OV1501011 Dear Mr. Tassone, Thank you for submitting a Final Public Art application for Tucson Cactus and Koi. Based on your submittal, Town staff has approved the art piece. If you have any questions, please contact me at msimms@orovalleyaz.gov or 520.229.4836. Best regards, Vitcat-"-,Imwa) Milini Simms Senior Planner msimms@orovalleyaz.gov 520.229.4836 CC: File Oro Valley,it's in our nature. 11000 N. La Canada Drive,Oro Valley,Arizona 85737 www.orovalleyaz.gov I phone:(520)229-4800 I fax:(520)742-1022 11 Q ' Conceptual Public Art Conceptual Design Review Board Staff Report CASE NUMBER: OV1501011 MEETING DATE: September 12, 2017 AGENDA ITEM: 3 STAFF CONTACT: Milini Simms, Planner msimms©orovalleyaz.gov(520)229-4836 Applicant: Daniel Tassone, Tucson Cactus and Koi Request: Conceptual Public Art for Tucson Cactus and Koi Location: East of Oracle Rd., approximately IA mile south of Magee Rd. Recommendation: Approve requested public artwork SUMMARY: The purpose of this request is to consider Conceptual Public Art for Tucson Cactus and Koi, located east of Oracle Rd., approximately a ' mile south of Magee Rd. (see Attachment 1). The applicant proposes a mosaic mural depicting koi fish in a desert pond.The proposed art piece will be installed along a seating wall, near the property's main entrance. A site plan showing the proposed art location is included in Attachment 2. The proposed artwork uses painted ceramic tiles to create the mosaic mural. The applicant's description and design of the proposed artwork is provided in Attachment 2. BACKGROUND l DETAILED INFORMATION: Previous Approvals: • 2014: Property rezoned from Residential Service to Neighborhood Commercial • 2016: Approval of the Final Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Architecture Request Details: • Install a mosaic mural along a seating wall, near the main entrance - Dimensions: 3'x 5' (height and width) - Materials: Ceramic tiles - Colors: Variety of glazes used to create the image - Total cost: $3,500.00 • Installation fees: $5,000.00 • Building permit valuation: $504,705.21 • Required art budget: $5,047.21 • Proposed art budget: $8,500.00 4 11111111111111111111111111, OV 1501011 Tucson Cactus and Koi Page 2 of 4 Conceptual Design Review Board Staff Report DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS: Tucson Cactus and Koi is a partially constructed development consisting of a 1,800 sq. ft. store and showroom, walking trails, koi pond and plant nursery. The proposed art is necessary to meet the Town's 1% Public Art requirement. Based on the project cost, a call to artists process was not required. The applicant worked with Santa Theresa Tile Works to contract local artist, Kristine Stoner, to design this custom piece. The proposed artwork has been evaluated and is in conformance with the Design Principles and Design Standards in the Zoning Code as provided below. For specifics, please see Attachment 2. Design Principle Analysis The Design Principles contained in Section 27.3.H provide the primary guidance for evaluating Public Art. Principles are shown below in italics, followed by staff commentary. Quality: Artwork demonstrates originality, artistic quality, and excellence in design and craftsmanship; to be demonstrated through renderings, explanation of construction, materials, and 4 artist resume. Staff Commentary: The artist has worked with Santa Theresa Tile Works since 1998 and her portfolio contains several mosaic murals. The proposed mural was designed specifically for this site, embodying the cactus and koi elements of the development. The artist will paint ceramic tiles with images of koi fish in a desert pond illustrating harmony between them. Response to Context: Artworks should be appropriate in scale, material, form and content for the immediate and general social and physical environments with which they are to relate. Staff Commentary: Since the primary functions of the development are outdoors, a mosaic mural along a seating wall is an appropriate form of art. The scale of the artwork is appropriate for the seating wall, which will be five(5)feet by seven(7)feet. Durability: Consideration should be given to structural and surface integrity, permanence, and protection against theft, vandalism, weathering, and excessive maintenance and repair costs. Staff Commentary: The proposed mosaic mural will be recessed into the stucco seating wall to prevent theft. A grout sealer will be applied upon completion and the artist will reapply it once, annually to further protect against theft and weathering. The glaze used to create the images becomes glass-like, protecting the ceramic tiles from weather and graffiti. Maintenance of the art piece is minimal and if needed, the artist will make all the repairs. Integration: Where possible, in addition to meeting aesthetic requirements, artworks should also serve to establish focal points, modify, enhance or define specific spaces or establish identity. Staff Commentary: The location of the proposed artwork is along a seating wall, near the main entrance of the property. The mosaic mural will not only create a focal point but also a sense of arrival for customers. 4V1501011 Tucson Cactus and Koi Page 3 of 4 Conceptual Design Review Board Staff Report Safety:Artworks should not present a hazard or create unsafe conditions. Staff Commentary: The ceramic tiles will be set flush along the seating wall without jutting out or exposing any potentially sharp edges. Diversity:Artworks should contribute to a diversity of style, scale, media, artists, community values and forms of expression within the Town. Staff Commentary: The proposed artwork will add to the diversity and style of public art and does not duplicate other art pieces found in the Town. Visibility: Artworks should be visible and accessible for the purposes of public enjoyment and security, considering pedestrian and vehicular traffic, lighting, active hours on site and future development and vegetation growth. Staff Commentary: The proposed mural will be significantly visible as a point of arrival for customers. Visitors must walk by the mural to access the walking trails, koi pond and plant nursery. It will also be visible from Oracle Rd. for the general public's enjoyment. Feasibility: Consideration should be given to the likelihood of successful completion of the artwork. Factors to be considered include but are not limited to: project budget, timeline, artist's experience and soundness of materials. Staff Commentary: The proposed mural will likely be installed because the project is nearing completion. Installation of public art is also required prior to the issuance of a Final Certificate of Occupancy. Advertising Elements: Public art shall not reflect or include advertising elements of a business or corporation including colors, graphics, logos or other representations of corporate identity Staff Commentary: The proposed artwork does not contain elements of corporate advertising. Design Standards Analysis The Design Standards contained in Addendum "A" provide the secondary guidance for evaluating Conceptual Public Art. The Design Standard below is shown in italics, followed by staff commentary. Public art shall be integrated into the overall design of the project and shall be located in areas of high visibility and use such as courtyards, seating areas, and along public roadways. Staff Commentary: The proposed artwork is located along a seating wall, near the main entrance to the property. Visitors must pass by the mural to access the walking trails, koi pond, and plant nursery. The artwork will also be viewable from Oracle Rd. for the general public's enjoyment. OV1501011 Tucson Cactus and Koi Page 4 of 4 Conceptual Design Review Board Staff Report RECOMMENDATION: Based on a finding that the Conceptual Public Art is in general conformance with the Oro Valley Zoning Code, it is recommended that the Conceptual Design Review Board take the following action: Recommend approval to the Town Council of the Conceptual Public Art for Tucson Cactus and Koi, SUGGESTED MOTIONS: I move to recommend approval of the Conceptual Public Art for Tucson Cactus and Koi, based on the finding that the proposed public artwork is consistent with the Design Principles and Design Standards. OR I move to recommend denial of the Conceptual Public Art for Tucson Cactus and Kai, as it does not meet ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Applicant's Submittal Bayerella, Planning Manager ifir0 .. •,,„...,,,,,,,„„,,,,, ,..,_ ..... . ....,...„,;„,,, a �,� *r .ate " 3��w gg # + ' Alio - , - ` ;if,,,,,,,, v ,„,,,,i, . m '6 F „, ,,..t.,,,,„.,,„.. ,..,.!.!!. 1 ,, ,,,,,,, . , . ., :,,. . . ,,,,,,,,:,„,,..w. ,,, .,, -,,,,,,,I ,J.,,,,I,-,-,,,, ...,,,,;, . , , , ' ,,,,,a0,,t,,,ovo ',,,' ,,,, t ,-,!›., -- ,.;i: .Allussit• ,.- '',„ .1-' ,-, ' ' ,-,' '• d�." • ` ' * ,t' 1 A,,,, Via. ,, �0 yMMM►. " p, ; z, ,s,, . e . t ," Wit.. " �' ,q� n» x i , , . �.r a"� A. . ,1;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,�y," os § $, * .a A < ¢,. .1p i li �� ° ' t iA • « F r � lCa. es 't k , ° t,4 ' Vi + � i .a " '"ne$ws ♦j.« : l �y i =�. t • " s sN • 4 t . pia•." 91NY • ; 4 . r.,,,, ;,, . . . ..• . ,,,, .„,„, ,. , J X. P' i,44# •.,, el _ ♦ n 4r'3$k 'b ItEw 0 P �» • #aY — (117 :::‘ 4''''' ‘31,,,t, -,d*fititl-cf„.„r- ,,,,,, 4,4 , ',,',e.'";,°,..' ' ,,' 44 IS* 4 •. liklt.' *--,s . 41„,..--, - , ›,›* . ,,,v . ,", , ", * . I ,. 't,'•.,4,,, ,' ''' —.4, .9'•,'4:'• • .cti*,,,t,i, 'AM, 9 M 4. y ;- r .. $ .! . ,,,,, .›"Irp l›,,',.• ,‘',. .- .A,, °At,*" 1.6,1 • ,`-,' ii ‘,k‘ l's I:* All-1 -I' .. i to n111111.= ,. '�. f i ... E' Yellow Line — Subject Property Boundary -Jr' _,EY q�,/ e2a zoy--.7 Tucson Cactus & Koi Location Map (0V1501011) g,,, Attachment 1 OVtQ .IQ % 1 Qo'-4t4fY,a)5��o2 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY f ._ DEVELOPMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES DEPARTMENT -,t; , 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE, ORO VALLEY, AZ. 85737 .4.46 , _ PHONE: (520) 229-4800 FAX (520) 742-1022 Asa,"- ...:.. r www,orovallevaz govldis VNDED kg'i 1.2 GENERAL APPLICATION FORM office Use My C V Case#' aO"I 15010\ 1 ' Applicatiop Type ❑ Major General Plan Amendment ❑ Final Plat 0' Sat r t,' CI Rezoning/PAD Amendment. CI Pre-Application :; CI Planned Area Development ❑ Zoning Verification 11V x 6 �;�' • Conditional Use Permit 0 Sign �' J� `` Criteria l ❑ Zoning Code Amendment ❑ Sign-PAD Exemption':l'°° . °°° ❑ Conceptual Site Plan ❑ Master Sign Program °.. ❑ Conceptual Public Art ❑ Communication Facility Tier 1 and 2 Minor ❑ Conceptual Architecture i LI Communication Facility--Major Final Site Plan ❑ Revised Development Plan ❑ Conceptual Landscape Plan 1 1 Other F 1-NI Irl P u b 1,i c A r ._- Subject Property Information: n Address:, "' ,,01 a �,,,�- ` GL, 07 Parcel/Tax Code:_4.2D )01 1 .�i-4.Z6 101 L.I Subdivisionn/Commercial Center Name:SIXI L VN%L / i Book/Page or Sequence Number: + t 3 ! f'a. I Lot Number(s) t I Pc" 12 A Legal Description: 50.�- �"�'�,L PJl.X_I Section/Township/Range: 3(P�l 7. Property:Area of VA ,�aA� � �'� Existing Land Use: v Proposed Land Use: 14 k...01 Applicant Information: *If more than one, attach list Applicant': Name: O019Pk 12 Fimr 1c1 C4 I OC, Address: PO 1036 1315 2 City:1 5Ot.J State: Ab Zip: gc 4'32 Telephone: .1f 40 /Q I CO Fax; *cap 3(p o Email: rrr Z2. 3 C, C.d s-i''i 'th Property Owner(s)if different,from Applicant*: ,."i Name:,...1 )6%.) YOt 4 VaSnal Firm: i rk---i- t /���'r--�-r0 pecevia -I Address: 3 2 0 9 City: ` C&) State:AZ Zip: S$ d/5 Telephor,e: Fax: . Email: reZ2.- @ s \O4c1.yt.-e- (5T c, tr CLVt0 Consultant (Discipline) Name: Ct2N06 5 V I Firm: ` J] 69 I Li Address: 16210 �` tL OL . ' t 4 City: _ L . Stat0e: AZ, Zip: �:A� �C7 Telephone: Lei53.�j Fax: Email: `� r 1 ,J f c. e.onso, . , 5voictitk . con,-\ , 1 ,` Tucson Cactus and KOI Rprt l 2(;):)c)ii18 Public Art Project Building Valuation: The permit valuation for building is$504705.21 The budget for artwork is 1%at$5047.05.This is below the one million mark for the call for artist process.Please see attached for the valuation sheet and phases. Public Artwork: The artist that was chosen is Kristen Stoner with Santa Theresa Tile Works.Santa Theresa has done several public art pieces in the town of Oro valley and Kristen has created a truly original piece that brings the botanical feel of the desert to meet a koi pond. Please see attached for resume and her previous work. Budget: The budget for the public art is$5047.05.The artwork is$3500 and and the installation is$5000.The total is$8500 with the over budget cost of$3452.95 Timeline: The timeframe for installation is around 10days.We would like to start building by by September 25 and be completed by the end of September 2017 Maintenance Plan: a.The frequency of maintenance is once every month. b.The maintenance steps are to hose the tile down with water. c.The responsible party for any repairs will be the artist K.Stoner. d.The grout only needs to be sealed after completetion and applied once annually. It will be sealed with a product called 511 impregnated original penetrating sealer. e.The Ceramic tile being used is called Cone 5 clay bodies with absorption below 3%to ensure durability and frost resistance. Cone 5 glazes will be used for great color as well as easy graffiti versabond mortar.The Glazed tile being used is very dense and sealer and any liquid will not penetrate it.The glaze becomes glass and doesn't need to be sealed. Public Art Title: The title of the artwork is called Desert Zen.The plaque is going to be 50 square inches and will state on it Desert Zen with Kristen Stoners name below it with words Oro valley 1%public art program see attached for location and text Final review: Evidence of insurance will be provided at final review. Daniel Tassone 520/603-0297 ® DATE(MM/DD/YYYY) A LJ CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE 3/6/2018 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER,AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED,the policy(ies)must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED,subject to the terms and conditions of the policy,certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER CONTACT NAME: Lori Steiner Crest Insurance Group, LLC PHONE FAX 5285 E Williams Cir.Ste 4500 (A/C.No.Ext):520-881-5760 LAvc No):520-325-3757 Tucson AZ 85711 ADD TRESS: Isteiner@crestins.Com INSURER(S)AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIL# INSURER A:Pekin Insurance Company 24288 INSURED 70TUCSCAC INSURER B: Tucson Cactus Company dba Tucson Cactus&Koi Holding Co LLC INSURER C: 800 E Magee Rd. INSURER D: Oro Valley AZ 85737 INSURER E: INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER:1913467422 REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR TYPE OF INSURANCE ADDL SUBR POLICY EFF POLICY EXP LIMITS LTR INSD WVD POLICY NUMBER (MM/DD/YYYY) (MM/DD/YYYY) A X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CL0211484 4/21/2017 4/21/2018 EACH OCCURRENCE $2,000,000 DAMAGE CLAIMS-MADE X OCCUR P EMISESO(EaENTED occurrence) $100,000 MED EXP(Any one person) $5,000 PERSONAL&ADV INJURY $2,000,000 GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: GENERAL AGGREGATE $4,000,000 POLICY X LOC PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG $4,000,000 OTHER: $ A AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY 00P710977 4/21/2017 4/21/2018 COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $ (Ea accident) 1,000.000 ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY(Per person) $ OWNED x SCHEDULED BODILY INJURY(Per accident) $ AUTOS ONLY AUTOS X HIRED X NON-OWNED PROPERTY DAMAGE $ AUTOS ONLY AUTOS ONLY (Per accident) UMBRELLA LIAB OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE $ EXCESS LIAB CLAIMS-MADE AGGREGATE $ DED RETENTION$ $ A WORKERS COMPENSATION WC0014444 4/21/2017 4/21/2018 x STATUTE EOTH AND EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY Y/N ANYPROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE NIA E.L.EACH ACCIDENT $1,000,000 OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? (Mandatory in NH) E.L.DISEASE-EA EMPLOYEE $1,000,000 If yes,describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L.DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT $1,000,000 A Fine Arts Floater CL0211484 4/21/2017 4/21/2018 Limit 3,500 Deductible 500 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES(ACORD 101,Additional Remarks Schedule,may be attached if more space is required) This form is subject to all policy forms,terms,endorsements,conditions definitions&exclusions. CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. City of Oro Valley 11000 N.La Canada Drive Oro VycAZ 85737 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ClIttt R4bC.14;(1 MAR Z� ©1988-2015 AC• ! CORPO T ig reserved. ACORD 25(2016/03) a ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD M,�,�4 0 L Tucson Cactus and KO[ July 12,2017 Conceptual Public Art Project Building Valuation: The permit valuation for building is$504705.21 The budget for artwork is 1%at$5047.05.This is below the one million mark for the call for artist process.Please see attached for the valuation sheet and phases. Public Artwork: The artist that was chosen is Kristen Stoner with Santa Theresa Tile Works.Santa Theresa has done several public art pieces in the town of Oro valley and Kristen has created a truly original piece that brings the botanical feel of the desert to meet a koi pond. Please see attached for resume and her previous work. Budget: The budget for the public art is$5047.05.The artwork is$3500 and and the installation is$5000.The total is$8500 with the over budget cost of$3452.95 Timeline: The timeframe for installation is around 10days.We would like to start building by by September 25 and be completed by the end of September 2017 Maintenance Plan: a.The frequency of maintenance is once every month. b.The maintenance steps are to hose the tile down with water. c.The responsible party for any repairs will be the artist K.Stoner. d.The grout only needs to be sealed after completetion and applied once annually. It will be sealed with a product called 511 Impregnated original penetrating sealer. e.The Ceramic tile being used is called Cone 5 clay bodies with absorption below 3%to ensure durability and frost resistance. Cone 5 glazes will be used for great color as well as easy graffiti versabond mortar.The Glazed tile being used is very dense and sealer and any liquid will not penetrate it.The glaze becomes glass and doesn't need to be sealed. Public Art Title: The title of the artwork is called Desert Zen.The plaque is going to be 50 square inches and will state on it Desert Zen with Kristen Stoners name below it with words Oro valley 1%public art program see attached for location and text EarC.IWIER Final review: Evidence of insurance will be provided at final review. MAR 2 6 7018 Daniel Tassone 520/603-0297 'Y: Santa Theresa Tile Works Designer- Kristine Stoner Kristine Stoner has worked at Santa Theresa Tile Works in Tucson, Arizona since 1998. The Tile Works is a full production studio that specializes in handmade tile fabrication, mosaic design and installation. As a senior designer, Kristine manages residential and commercial projects from their initial concept development through their completion. She has participated in numerous public art projects, which include mosaic tile installations at the University of Arizona, Paul Revere Park in Boston, Massachusetts, Charlotte Mecklenburg water treatment facility in North Carolina and the Oro Valley Market Place. Proposed Artwork 2ft x 5ft mosaic panel for seat wall Materials -Ceramic tile. Cone 5 clay bodies with a water absorption below 3% will be used to ensure durability and frost resistance. -Cone 5 glazes will be used for great color as well as easy graffiti clean.- Versabond mortar -Customs Polyblend Sanded Grout -Grout sealer for easy clean up. Description The mosaic panel will include desert and koi pond images. Blues and greens will predominate the water section that will be set in juxtaposition to a swirling yellow sun over desert sands. The panel showcases 3 lively koi fish swimming around lily pads as a succulent aloe with santa rita prickly peak enliven the desert floor. The two distinct sections are divided by a curve that is reminiscent of the yin-yang symbol. The composition harmoniously brings together contrasting elements- hot and cold, dry desert and cool pond, cactus and koi. The artwork will be located at the main entrance of the site and will be visible from the street. Tiles will be set flush in a reveal along the seat wall and will follow the curve of the wall without jutting out and exposing potentially sha ed 0 SONTRNIPI MAR 2 6 2010 BY. 11Q10; 1 (\gi ,._ <_ ------------------„,---- ,/- \ ..7 7 1El / //, - .,,,,.-, 6 810Z 9 2 elVW r ,--;- .. . . . • ,-N.,_--- ; (3 --1- --) ( ,..3j \, /! - -----'-"-- /7 I * i 7\-\\ 'i , \ '1 .11it\hi.„•%. 1,\Q‘ 1 ..:771:1j /l i-- 17‘ p ' 1119 chh. 'I LL /4100.-''' - • - ' ' , / I /1) \\, sco)- (# ,..- osi /' —'1411S 1 (r IS ( ( Ry // ,---- & „......_ / )• ,„,, , ....„...... .. MI CCI9 C=4 k D4 T1/41 MI • A 'F---: - % C-- -1:::;52-4-1 r k.6C:P.e4,4 4,0 4 t p e_ , . • -s-roa,12 - % Of-S,f.9...-C* IX..1•4 ,„,.‘ vilecir,e, stoiNe.v oit* 1%culovw,lat-1 i)f. ------- + N 89'59'29„ / io.00' 89'59'29"E(R&M) '' 101.63' I — 391.52'(R) / A,��\i��'. 71�p7 h:iyLiJ q S v. „:' ',,' I &' C , N/ C iin , "--- , 11.5% 1 ,,a 3 IOC I f f [ //17( \\\ f ' t� q ,f:+ 6 Nt ti 1 i \ i 7r7 ) , f � ff . A /p/� i s t s t P1_- I) � • 1,..____ .,, 5, / HAZ :> �. - r t r I �s'4s•;sry 3. 0 ILI -/- . --, 1, vi W 1 c 11 fN j ESTIMATED 100 YI! I 1 ^� �FLOODf'LAEN_LIN(1T5 • •* ■ ■ �it. -----— , i ---j t --- I -- -1- AREA f:---- --'--...._______,- cg '-- ! o to 0CRITICAL I CN • N89'59 9"(R1) 355.591(C) I- a -. } 4ii- • o N89'5991"(C) r 11 I o o '0 RESOURCE _ • c t,.,, ii • I 0 f{t GLASS G • • A. 1 il n AF?IAN HA3ITAT i [ r ■ I �. I 9 4s,43„ ` a r ,4 .Q.oo (R i} w(M} �' ESTI ATED 100/rR _ __ _ _ • i�LOCDPLAIN-r(MiTS - - �-__-•- SIGNAGE AT BR1DGE ENTRY: -j� u mill l ' ------------------ I_ ___ , ----- - - ---'e' � MAX WEIGHT: !6,00(? POUNDS .!. -._r —— ----- PPC4— ~--r` ----� +t.i../.4-4-1- - %m ll" me, -al- _ A,, •-SETgAGKcra I I -•� �' )' -, .srLr► a*. � & Q I L.fFE$239o.ma usE J � I�''� r (‘( l:htTR7 ! • U 1)03 id /}7( 7 4 SdPet GO xM�'It i r ITS c 11111 •-_ 71 11 .� i RE F��QUSE:•Yu1�[ E FFE=2590.00r ' tdL-- —- t"WATL'R Q +� --__ l_fPE�259t2�._ - J ..../ i I _----- ---.' N89'59'29"E(R 1) 406.52' (R 1) N ; 1' ONSITE REFERENCE PLAN i RS `.f 1'-30 1 Santa Theresa Tile Works July 12 2017 Tucson Cactus and Kai Project • Creating an original piece of art with a botanical theme. The piece is titled Desert Zen the cost of design is$3500 Total:$3500 Kristen Stoner EF `q 0, /A7�A 1 � 1- 4, .o. D1) 151) 1.01- 1 Santa Theresa Tile Works July 12 2017 Tucson Cactus and Koi Project • Creating an original piece of art with a botanical theme. The piece is titled Desert Zen the cost of design is$3500 Total:$3500 Kristen Stoner Ze 10 •a ® n Desert Streams & Waterfalls, Inc Mike Coffee Po Box 12340 Tucson,Az 85732 520-603-6032 dswaterfaHs@aol.com www.desert-streams.com July 12 2017 Tucson Cactus&Koi Oracle Rd and Magee Rd Oro Vatiey,AZ Scope Of Project: • Building of the 5'by 7'wail with concrete footing.Wall will be stucco. $3,000 • Laying and inserting of mosaic tile 3'by 5'art piece recessed in the stucco wall $2,000 Total : $5000 Thank you • Hartman Construction LLC COST ESTIMATE FOR Tucson Koi and Cactus TOTAL SQUARE FEET Exhibit A ITEM Amount Notes Appliances 1,500.00 Allowance Appliance Installation 300.00 Architect Architect Fees owner Architect Review owner Blue Prints 250.0D Bath Accessories 1,370.00, Bath tile 2,880.00 8B0 Platform owner BOO Finish owner Cabinets and Countertops 15,000.00 Allowance Cabinets-storage closet 2,500.00w Allowance Carpentry Trim!rubber base 1,080.00 Cleanup ' 350.00 Concrete: Concretelstab 22,050.00 . 1 lb color polished 3,600.00 Concrete flat work 14,925.00 Bridge retaining wall footing Bridge Deck Curb and gutter Paving/striping DoorstiOpentngs: Store Front 26.000.00 Man doors 7,874.00 Rol-up glass doors 7,200.00 Drywall 9,500.00 Electrical: Electrical 29,200.00 Feeder Conduits 5.000.00 Light Fixtures/dimmers/speed 4,500.00' Allowance Engineering Costs: Hydrology owner Soil Test owner Compaction test Floor Coverings: none Framing 27, 25.00 Insulation 7.020.00 Landscaping/SWPPP owner Masonry Columns 13.500.00 Gambian and Sjgnaje walls 10,000.00 Allowance Retaining Walls none Trash Enclosure 1.800.00 Mechanical: Mechanical 16,542.00 Paint General 7.000.00 Bridge Permits&Fees owner Plumbing: Sewer and water lines Inc d Fire Line/Hydrant 20,000.00 Allowance Gas tine to Meter Included Fire Sprinklers 9,760,00 Plumbing 19,000.00 °,<' h + . Plumbing Fixtures R 3,500.00� AllowInceY Water meter owner 4, %X.•1 S Pool/Kos Pond owner 4 �� , Roof 7,500.00 '�' '.• ,tip;,; Sail canopy 9,500.00 •• eAA Skylights 1,600 00 t� '"' Steel j Bridge Steel t� Cubans 22,594.00 Allowance •••' !_�''tsh Enclosure Gates �.. 2 000.00 Page 1 of 2 • • Hartman Construction LLC COST ESTIMATE FOR Tucson Kol and Cactus TOTAL SQUARE FEET Exhibit A ITEM Amount Notes Metal F: M • and•-tea 50 947,0 - Exterior metal •anelslroof 12,000.00 Stucco 9 500.00 Site P Surve Site Pre• Erosion ControUR'•Ra• Included Gradi ! included Final Grafts• included Oust controfltracic out Included Tem•• Facilities: Tern•• Du ••ter 3 500,00 Tern wAr.4 Power 500 00 Tem•ors Toilet 750.00 Tem••ra Water 500.00 Termite Treatment 540,00 Utifi Trench! • included UtNit Trenchin!-Sadcfi!! included TOTAL HARD COST 411 837.00 Profits• . • u•= sloe 61,775.55 Subtotal 473,612.55 Sales Tax 31 092 66 TOTAL COST S 504,705.21 A 61 (st..„% • Page 2 of 2 POST IN A Annual Business License Town of Oro Valley License No. CONSPICUOUS moo N.La Canada Dr. PLACE Oro Valley,AZ 85737 3617 THIS LICENSE EXPIRES 12/31/2016 Business Name: HARTMAN CONSTRUCTION LLC Business Account No.: 2370 DBA Name: HARTMAN CONSTRUCTION LLC Address: 7049 E TANQUE VERDE RD TUCSON AZ 85715 This business is hereby licensed to conduct business in the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona. Category: GENERAL Type: GENERAL CONTRACTOR Date Issued: 01/01/2016 PAID By 4144 .4,0,4_, Michael Standish,CMC Oro Valley Town Clerk This License Is NOT Transferable License Copy KEEP THIS COPY Annual Business License License No. FOR YOUR Receipt 3617 RECORDS THIS LICENSE EXPIRES 12/31/2016 Business Name: HARTMAN CONSTRUCTION LLC Business Account No.: 2370 DBA Name: HARTMAN CONSTRUCTION LLC Address: 7049 E TANQUE VERDE RD PAID IN FULL TUCSON AZ 85715 ANNUAL BUSINESS LICENSE This is to certify that the above named business has paid the annual conduct business in the Town of siness license fee required is licensed to �p.1..��Y �t �, OroValley. �q p/zi o -� Category: GENERAL Type: GENERAL CONTRACTOR dam,_ By 4VALW Q Standish,C C fl E D 'U i trre alley Town Cie* . . t 44 ,.,,. ti 0( , ..,, ,a• .,,. , 14, - .. • I . df .i> , , , • • f It r ' .. - -6 „,.. .. • . ,. , , .- -, ••, '- — R, AlSk N•*, : itil • •,,, ''" ..... 40..".000.,, .4, 4 vt. Af - A° 44 ' *aer 0 • 1r .'''',4,, 1, . . ii, ve 01111111, .11 1 *-;: 4 4 r . • el ,... t ... . r''''‘, t •;," ,1 tilif I 1 il lik .t* V •. • . 011114 IIII . t-',# Ili 446 4111,1, ittfr. , 144 -,• . ' . 1 IWO . , • • . • • .. 4 r , ,. • . ., - 1# '.4 . 'S ' ,, . '," -.401011 . '••• g - -',';'. '; ' ,,i; ',:!-,-,, ''' ' t'',-,-t1' :, ,,,4410.. ...-, • -- .. g tlk . 4- 7, ... ,•,' • 4 tt ' ..... ...... p NO 1 • f „ okis 4 '01/1/Pivs' Ah aripp. , -, * .---#'1. _ et- " „, 4 sc ' 4' "t 1( . al fr,..,ttF4 ,. 1,- , 4.......: : '4,„,..,_4 3 •-• 4, :... , , „.., ,... . 7.1 ...1 ... 4* t"*- 11, ...... 6 i.. .-„,, . .,,, ,_, • 40 ' ' -- ..-• 104,11111111W 4 - fi, 4 • .114 .710-• ve .,. , .. , , .. ...AS 1 'rb Ck:114 .'4. .. 'j;;;,:.s.". ' • ,/,Ii. N 111)0 Lb Li ,..,:a*.141 ,.- - jow: . iii4i°: —gas" . fe% '-''',57.- ft:-..,..,',7 4. .., . it , 40 • • ,.... . , lie ,11 Lk.20... . .--21e.iiii'41‘-‘6'.- ,.'-. '7 T-'" tif sr ? ,' , k -•.4.A* -1111F ''', 4 • '.; 441". - .. i` WO_iiir4,.ali-.Az— '-' Atea„, ,,,,,..4t.4. _ ii ., :-.,,,ivir, Ittiv,.,4,,, ,. 41.0.--- , ,se,,r.si, , ,..., r� " draw., 7r. E +y r .ice '' �.. 4,64/4), x. is( '). , -....,,,, . • k, w if 4 �t y,; 4 6 ..,... . „.„,,,,,,„,„„.,,..„.,„ ,. ., ..,.._...... _ _,,_ 4„.„,•,.. _ „.. 1..*:‘,..—...1;',-,:;;;Y :4::'''' p^ t ^#:.f 4 -',-.,',9,,-.--- -- 4 ,..:_-:,.. �&. ..„,._••:- ,,,,,,7=4; '--!'' ?,---- "� .,..,,,_ ' . _•,.....„1,....„,_• ,.. •, i %\ ''' '' '-:,>.• .y �t` � E j b• . 00 N89'59'29"E R&M ,1 , N 89 59 29 � � ) Air 4; yf 101 .63' i 391 .52'(R) (titi\ 0 ii j' i ... •,,-- p 1,,/ .~- ` /" ;-��.. � .. ^Ace f Z N ' f> Oil r • I f 7r F. I s. - 7 --'' \NH' ,' Ili I (0 tv r i\ 1� I IQ ,. j _ .. I t 1 II ..32.1t,,_ r_1. 11.4±.....L I in 1 _ Ro5 t `� / HZt� 11 r ` i .- 11) j ,, i f S7g•46• .> -�-�, I I -�i �/ . 50.00► 7 5 E(M& �.� � .., t, ill Ore k ft/ '''.ft'''"''..,_. ., . i /1 ,V lit'"."".. ''�-`_- ESTIMATED 100 YR 1 0 �"�, I 1 FL00D'L�41N LINTS-._ `� in I �'�• i t i; i ,._._ 1z - ; I AREA r o _ ~-- /0 u____ - CRITICAL ■ �: ,? 1 - 1 I I • oli : CN N89.59,9"(R 1) 355.59 (C) I ``` I '- - - N89 59 1 C I 111' ill0, o z RESOURCE - - t h 11, .. ,, C!} l GLAS "G j I 11�, I 4 0 ARIAN HABITAT i = s t / I N79°4 --I - t .' • a ��1 W(M) E5TI f�I TED oM ) - + f 001°R ----_ •_ , .1_ FLOCDPL�IA!-LIMITS 4______ I SIGNAGE AT BRIDGE ENTRY: -'•�� -g^ �.__.....__------ I - 1 1 _ + MAX WEIGHT: 16,000 POUNDS I j - _ _ -__ - m i�-r _� - ! ��ElQG�SION L r--.1.8it ow-ISET5ACKN j ,/ .. .. - ii. . . .-._ L-, f 7 BREEN¢OUSE I �, } RETAIL :.jam 0 ;' FFE=2590.(p0 i � w MAIN ! tr) in 'IQ (( LNTRY I d-' co t \ tz-,. 4" SEINER - -GG t - . t 10 • ( I + 1 GREENHC)USE 1( I. .'-I \ SLDG 3'' r- . j I W'�`TER ! FFE_2590.0q 1 Lit._- — - I W,4TER M o 25' 117E _ S� GK _-- -- L FPE 259i�.Ild.-, J G) I GFtE PH4 a.. KATE1t t 1 L J N89'59'29"E(R1 ) 406.52' (R1) N r i \ 1`� E REFERENCE PLAN I ALTA Commitment(6/17/06) ALTA Commitment Form COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE ISSUED BY STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY, a Texas Corporation ("Company"), for a valuable consideration, commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the Proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges and compliance with the Requirements; all subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions of this Commitment. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the Proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A by the Company. All liability and obligation under this Commitment shall cease and terminate six months after the Effective Date or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue the policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. The Company will provide a sample of the policy form upon request. This Commitment shall not be valid or binding until countersigned by a validating officer or authorized signatory. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Stewart Title Guaranty Company has caused its corporate name and seal to be affixed by its duly authorized officers on the date shown in Schedule A. Countersigned by: Stewart title guaranty company ALAttorized CcultersIgrtatur Matt Morris N President and CEO v -it.E pod Stewart Title&Trust of Tucson :‘ y . 3939 E. Broadway Tucson,AZ 85711 + 1 (520)327-7373 :` •*• «R° •f x Ns Denise C rraux Secretary Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. M ";` ~ All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. File No. 05504-10959 004-UN ALTA Commitment(6/17/06) • w CONDITIONS 1. The term mortgage,when used herein, shall include deed of trust,trust deed, or other security instrument. 2. If the proposed Insured has or acquired actual knowledge of any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing,the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a)to comply with the requirements hereof, or(b)to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions and Conditions and the Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. This Commitment is a contract to issue one or more title insurance policies and is not an abstract of title or a report of the condition of title. Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed Insured may have or may bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the status of the mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of this Commitment. As to ALTA 2006 Policy forms: 5. The policy to be issued contains an arbitration clause. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Insurance is $2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. You may review a copy of the arbitration rules at<http://www.alta.orq/>. All notices required to be given the Company and any statement in writing required to be furnished the Company shall be addressed to it at P.O. Box 2029, Houston,Texas 77252. Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. '4''t i' ,AN All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. htkf.i ik.I lYi File No. 05504-10959 004-UN ALTA Commitment(6/17/06) SCHEDULE A File No.: 05504-10959 Escrow Officer: Effective Date: July 30, 2015 at 5:00 p.m. Title Officer: Jan Stephenson 1. Policy or Policies to be issued: Amount of Insurance (a) 1974 (LTAA Standard Coverage) Proposed Insured: TBD- Buyer/Borrower (b)ALTA Loan Policy 1974 (LTAA Standard Coverage) Proposed Insured: 2. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is: Fee 3. Title to said estate or interest in said land is at the effective date hereof vested in: Tucson Koi &Water Gardens, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company as to Parcel 1, Ramirez-Goldberg Properties, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company as to Parcel 2 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: SEE EXHIBIT"A"ATTACHED HERETO 5. The Deed of Trust to be insured and the assignments thereof, if any are described as follows: Deed of Trust given to secure the original amount of$*, and any other amounts payable under the terms thereof Dated: * Tru sto r: * Trustee: * Beneficiary: * Recorded: *, in * File No. 05504-10959 Page 1 of 2 STEWART TITLE Commitment Sch A SAC GUARANTY COMPANY EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL 1: Tucson Koi &Water Gardens, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company That portion of Block"B" of SUFFOLK HILLS, a subdivision of Pima County,Arizona, according to the plat of record in the office of the County Recorder in Book 13 of Maps and Plats, page 18, described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest Corner of Block"B". Thence South 10°16'10" West, along the West line of said Block"B" 150 feet; Thence North 89°59'29" East, 406.52 feet to a point on the East line of said Block"B"; Thence North 10°16'10" East, along the East line of Block"B" a distance of 135 feet; Thence North 39°52'10" West 19.23 feet; Thence South 89°59'29" West, along the North line of Block"B", a distance of 391.52 feet to the True point of Beginning. EXCEPT that portion conveyed to the State of Arizona by Deed recorded March 13th, 1979 in Docket 5982 at Page 577; FURTHER EXCEPT any portion included in the Final Order of Condemnation Superior Court Case No. 177462 recorded January 16, 1981 in Docket 6483 page 860. PARCEL 2: Ramirez-Goldberg Properties, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company That portion of Block"B" of SUFFOLK HILLS, a subdivision of Pima County,Arizona, according to the plat of record in the office of the County Recorder in Book 13 of Maps and Plats, page 18, described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest Corner of Block"B". Thence South 10°16'10" West, along the West line of said Block"B" 150 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence continue South 10°16'10"West, along the West line of Block"B" a distance of 155 feet; Thence North 89°59'29" East, 406.52 feet to a point in the East line of Block"B"; Thence North 10°16'10" East along the East line of said Block"B", a distance of 155 feet; Thence South 89°59'29" West, a distance of 406.52 feet to the Point of Beginning. EXCEPT that portion conveyed to the State of Arizona by Deed recorded March 13th, 1979 in Docket 5982 at Page 577, FURTHER EXCEPT any portion included in the Final Order of Condemnation Superior Court Case No. 177462 recorded January 16, 1981 in Docket 6483 page 860. File No. 05504-10959 Page 2 of 2 STEWART TITLE Commitment Sch A SAC GUARANTY COMPANY COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE B File No.: 05504-10959 Showing matters which will be excepted in the Policy unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. i. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. ii. Subject to the usual printed exclusions and exceptions contained in the regular form of policy, reprinted for reference on the Addendum attached hereto. The following matters will be excepted in Schedule B of the policy to be issued: 1. Taxes and assessments collectible by the County Treasurer, not yet due and payable for the year 2015. 2. Any action by the County Assessor and/or Treasurer, altering the current or prior tax assessment, subsequent to the date of the Policy of Title Insurance. 3. Water rights, claims or title to water, and agreements, covenants, conditions or rights incident thereto, whether or not shown by the public records. 4. Reservations or exceptions in Patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof. 5. Easements, restrictions, reservations and conditions as set forth on the recorded plat of said subdivision. 6. Terms and conditions as contained in instrument entitled Agreement, recorded in Book 108 or Miscellaneous Records page 333. 7. Easement for water pipelines, and rights incident thereto, as set forth in instrument recorded in Docket 147 page 580. 8. Terms and conditions as contained in instrument entitled Grant,. recorded in Docket 1770 page 116. 9. Restrictions, Conditions, Covenants, Reservations, Liabilities and Obligations, including but not limited to any recitals creating easements, party walls or assessments, omitting, if any, from the above, any restrictions based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin contained in instrument recorded in Docket 1289 page 11,Amended in Docket 11204 page 1139. 10. Terms and conditions as contained in instrument entitled Deed of Easement, recorded in Docket 13083 page 4960. (Affects Parcel 2) 11. Liabilities and obligations imposed upon said land by reason of its inclusion within the Central Arizona Water Conservation District. 12. Liabilities and obligations imposed upon said land by reason of its inclusion within the Mountain Vista Fire District. 13. Any easements or rights of way not disclosed by those public records which impart constructive notice and which are not visible and apparent from an inspection of the surface of said land. 14. Location of improvements, easements, discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments or any other facts, which a correct survey would disclose. 15. Rights of parties in possession on month-to-month tenancy or under written but unrecorded leases. File No. 05504-10959 Page 1 of 5 STEWART TITLE Commitment Sch B SAC GUARANTY COMPANY COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE B File No.: 05504-10959 File No. 05504-10959 Page 2 of 5 STEWART TITLE Commitment Sch B SAC GUARANTY COMPANY COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE B File No.: 05504-10959 REQUIREMENTS The County Recorder may not accept documents for recording which do not comply with Arizona Revised Statutes 11-480 which, among other things, requires the following: a. Print must be ten-point type (pica) or larger. b. Margins of at least one-half inch along the left and right sides, one-half inch across the bottom, and on the first page at least two inches on top for recording and return address information. (NOTE: Nothing must be contained in the margin areas, including initials) c. Each instrument shall be no larger than 8-1/2 inches in width and 14 inches in length. Due to changes in Arizona Revised Statutes the County Recorder may not accent for recording any documents containing any more than five numbers that are reasonably identifiable as being part of an individual's Social Security Number, Credit Card, Charge Card or Debit Card Numbers, Retirement Account Numbers, Savings, Checking or Securities Entitlement Account Numbers. The following requirements must be met and completed to the satisfaction of the Company before its policy of title insurance will be issued: 1. PROPERTY appears free and clear of encumbrances. Seller to disclose property status. 2. THE RIGHT IS RESERVED to make additional exceptions or requirements upon submission of the name of the proposed insured. 3. THE RIGHT IS RESERVED to make additional exceptions or requirements upon submission of adequate information concerning the nature of the proposed transaction. 4. APPROVAL by the Legal Department of the Company of this Commitment prior to close of escrow and issuance of policy. 5. SUBMIT fully executed copy of the Operating Agreement(and all amendments) of Tucson Koi & Water Gardens, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, for examination. The right is reserved to make additional requirements upon said examination. -or- FURNISH currently certified copy of a Resolution by the members of Tucson Koi & Water Gardens, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, authorizing the execution and delivery by the proper officers of all instruments required to consummate this transaction. Said certification must be by an officer other than the officer(s) authorized to sign and must state that the Resolution has not been revoked. 6. SUBMIT fully executed copy of the Operating Agreement (and all amendments) of Ramirez-Goldberg Properties, LLC„ a limited liability company for examination.The right is reserved to make additional requirements upon said examination. -or- FURNISH currently certified copy of a Resolution by the members of Ramirez-Goldberg Properties LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, authorizing the execution and delivery by the proper officers of all instruments required to consummate this transaction. Said certification must be by an officer other than the officer(s) authorized to File No. 05504-10959 Page 3 of 5 STEWART TITLE Commitment Sch B SAC GUARANTY COMPANY COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE B File No.: 05504-10959 sign and must state that the Resolution has not been revoked. 7. RECORD Deed from Tucson Koi &Water Gardens, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company as to Parcel 1, and Ramirez-Goldberg Properties, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company as to Parcel 2 to* COMPLIANCE with A.R.S. 11-1133,which states that an affidavit must be completed by a seller and a buyer and appended to a deed or contract for the sale of real estate which is presented for recording. Pursuant to A.R.S. 1134 A& B, the affidavit and fee required by this article may not apply to certain deeds and/or transfers of title. If a document is exempt, the Exemption Code must appear on the face of the document. 8. RECORD Deed of Trust to be insured, shown at Schedule A, Paragraph 5 TAX STATUS NOTE: Year: 2014 Parcel No.: 225-51-011A Total Amount: $6389.69 First half: $paid Second half: $paid TAX STATUS NOTE: Year: 2014 Parcel No.: 225-51-012A Total Amount: $5286.30 First half: $paid Second half: $paid (Property tax notices are mailed on or about September 1st for the tax year due. First half taxes are due October 1st of the tax year shown and delinquent November 1st of that same year. Second half taxes are due March 1st of the following year and delinquent May 1st of the following year.) Escrow personnel MUST verify any delinquent taxes information with the Pima County Treasurer's office. STREET ADDRESS NOTE: According to the Pima County Assessor's Office, the purported street address of the subject property is disclosed as follows: 00 no name Tucson,AZ This information is provided as a courtesy, and no liability is assumed as to its accuracy. If no address is shown, it means the Assessor does not disclose one. CHAIN OF TITLE (24 month) VESTING NOTE: The subject property is currently vested in the party(ies) shown in Schedule A, Paragraph 3, by instrument recorded 10-3-2014 in Seq# 2014-2760423 as to Parcel 1, and recorded 03-28-2014 in Seq# 2014-0870432 as to Parcel records of Pima County,Arizona. NOTE: This transaction does not qualify for a short term Re-Issue Rate. File No. 05504-10959 Page 4 of 5 STEWART TITLE Commitment Sch B SAC GUARANTY COMPANY • COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE B File No.: 05504-10959 POLICY NOTE: Unless specified otherwise on Schedule A,ALTA 2006 coverage policy(s)will be issued in connection with this transaction. WIRING NOTE: Arizona Revised Statutes Section 6-483 regulates the disbursement of funds by escrow agents. Funds received by Stewart Title & Trust of Tucson via wire transfer may be disbursed upon receipt. Other types of payments may delay closing of your transaction. You should contact your escrow officer directly to obtain wiring instructions. SEARCH NOTE: All searches required pursuant to issuance of this commitment for title insurance were performed through a dedicated title plant, including a search of the geographically posted indices affecting the subject real property a nd any matters disclosed in the general index relating to the parties being insured herein.Accordingly those matters, if any, are shown herein. LENDER NOTE (Only applies to Purchase Money Loans): The name(s) of the proposed buyers in this transaction has (have) not been searched in the public records and this commitment does not reflect matters such as liens, proceedings or decrees, which do not specifically describe the land which is referred to in this commitment. If any do exist, they may affect the title or impose liens or encumbrances upon the land herein described. Any loan policy issued pursuant to the terms hereof that insures the loan securing a purchase money obligation on residential property will insure that such matters, if any, are subordinate to the lien being insured herein. THIS COMMITMENT IS NOT AN ABSTRACT, EXAMINATION, REPORT OR REPRESENTATION OF FACT OR TITLE AND DOES NOT CREATE AND SHALL NOT BE THE BASIS OF ANY CLAIM FOR NEGLIGENCE, NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION OR OTHER TORT CLAIM OR ACTION. THE SOLE LIABILITY OF COMPANY AND ITS TITLE INSURANCE AGENT SHALL ARISE UNDER AND BE GOVERNED BY THE CONDITIONS OF THE COMMITMENT. File No. 05504-10959 Page 5 of 5 STEWART TITLE Commitment Sch B SAC GUARANTY COMPANY ADDENDUM TO COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to or exclusions from coverage as to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of or by agreement with the Company. EXCEPTIONS TO STANDARD POLICIES AND ALTA OWNER'S POLICIES 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records. Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records 2. Any facts, rights, interest or claims which are not shown by the Public Records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof,which are not shown by the Public Records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by the Public Records. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims. (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof. (c)water rights, claims or title to water. 6. Any right, title, interest, estate or easement in land beyond the lines of the area specifically described or referred to in Schedule A, or in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways or waterways, but nothing in this paragraph shall modify or limit the extent to which the ordinary right of an abutting owner for access to a physically open street or highway is insured by this policy. 7. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the Public Records. EXCLUSIONS FROM STANDARD POLICIES, ALTA OWNER'S POLICIES AND ALTA LOAN POLICIES EXCEPT 2006 POLICY FORMS 1. (a)Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii)a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or(iv)environmental protection, or the effect of the violation of any of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by(a)above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 4. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction (vesting in the insured the estate or interest)(creating the interest of the mortgagee) insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that is based on: (a) the transaction creating the (estate or interest insured by this policy)(interest of the insured mortgagee) being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer, or (b) the subordination of the insured mortgage (if applicable) as a result of the application of the doctrine of equitable subordination; or (c) the transaction creating the (estate or interest insured by this policy)(interest of the insured mortgagee) being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: (i) to timely record the instrument of transfer, or (ii) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. In addition, as to an ALTA Loan Policy only: 5. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is situated. 6. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending law. 7. Any statutory lien for services, labor or materials (or the claim of priority of any statutory lien for services, labor or materials over File Number: 05504-10959 Page 1 of 3 the lien of the insured mortgage) arising from an improvement or work related to the land which is contracted for and commenced subsequent to Date of Policy and is not financed in whole or in part by proceeds of the indebtedness secured by the insured mortgage which at Date of Policy the insured has advanced or is obligated to advance. NOTE: Exceptions numbered 1 through 7 above will be eliminated from an ALTA(Extended Coverage)Owner's or Loan Policy. Exclusions 1 through 7 are exclusions from coverage in the regular form of the policy and said items cannot be eliminated. EXCLUSIONS FROM ALTA 2006 OWNER'S POLICY: The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys'fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: 1. (a)Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (iii) the subdivision of land; or (iv) environmental protection; or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5. (b) Any governmental police power.This Exclusion 1(b)does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6. 2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (a)created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; (b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c)resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; (d)attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy(however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 9 and 10); or (e)resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Title. 4. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that the transaction vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A, is (a)a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (b)a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 9 of this policy. 5. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching between Date of Policy and the date of recording of the deed or other instrument of transfer in the Public Records that vests Title as shown in Schedule A. NOTE: Exceptions numbered 1 through 7 above will be eliminated from an ALTA (Extended Coverage) Owner's or Loan Policy. Exclusions 1 through 5 are exclusions from coverage in the regular form of the policy and said items cannot be eliminated. EXCLUSIONS FROM ALTA 2006 LOAN POLICY: The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys'fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: 1. (a)Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (iii) the subdivision of land; or (iv) environmental protection; or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5. (b)Any governmental police power.This Exclusion 1(b)does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6. 2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (a)created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; (b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c)resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; (d)attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy(however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 11, 13, or 14); or (e) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Insured Mortgage. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the Insured Mortgage because of the inability or failure of an Insu red to comply with applicable doing- File Number: 05504-10959 Page 2 of 3 business laws of the state where the Land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability in whole or in part of the lien of the Insured Mortgage that arises out of the transaction evidenced by the Insured Mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth-in-lending law. 6. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that the transaction creating the lien of the Insured Mortgage, is (a)a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer, or (b)a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 13(b)of this policy. 7. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching between Date of Policy and the date of recording of the Insured Mortgage in the Public Records. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 11(b). NOTE: Exceptions numbered 1 through 7 above will be eliminated from an ALTA (Extended Coverage) Owner's or Loan Policy. Exclusions 1 through 7 are exclusions from coverage in the regular form of the policy and said items cannot be eliminated. EXCLUSIONS FROM 2/3/10 ALTA HOMEOWNER'S POLICIES In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule B,You are not insured against loss, costs, attorneys'fees, and expenses resulting from: 1. Governmental police power, and the existence or violation of any law or government regulation concerning: a. building b. zoning c. land use d. improvements on the land e. land division f. environmental protection This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 8.a., 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 23 or 27. 2. The failure of Your existing structures, or any part of them, to be constructed in accordance with applicable building codes. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 14 or 15. 3. The right to take the Land by condemning it.This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 17. 4. Risks: a.that are created, allowed, or agreed to by You,whether or not they appear in the Public Records; b.that are Known to You at the Policy Date, but not to Us, unless they are recorded in the Public Records at the Policy Date; c.that result in no loss to You; or d.that first occur after the Policy Date-this does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 7, 8.e., 25, 26, 27 or 28. 5. Failure to pay value for Your Title. 6. Lack of a right: a.to any land outside the area specifically described and referred to in paragraph 3 of Schedule A; and b. in streets, alleys, or waterways that touch the Land. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 11 or 21. 7. The transfer of the Title to You is invalid as a preferential transfer or as a fraudulent transfer or conveyance under federal bankruptcy. LIMITATIONS ON COVERED RISKS Your insurance for the following Covered Risks is limited on the Owner's Coverage Statement as follows: For Covered Risk 16, 18, 19, and 21 Your Deductible Amount and Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability shown in Schedule A. The deductible amounts and maximum dollar limits shown on Schedule A are as follows: Your Deductible Amount Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability Covered Risk 16: 1%of Policy Amount or $2,500.00 $10,000.00 (whichever is less) Covered Risk 18: 1%of Policy Amount or $5,000.00 $25,000.00 (whichever is less) Covered Risk 19: 1%of Policy Amount or $5,000.00 $25,000.00 (whichever is less) Covered Risk 21: 1%of Policy Amount or $2,500.00 $5,000.00 File Number: 05504-10959 Page 3 of 3 • STG Privacy Notice Stewart Title Companies WHAT DO THE STEWART TITLE COMPANIES DO WITH YOUR PERSONAL INFORMATION? Federal and applicable state law and regulations give consumers the right to limit some but not all sharing. Federal and applicable state law regulations also require us to tell you how we collect, share, and protect your personal information. Please read this notice carefully to understand how we use your personal information.This privacy notice is distributed on behalf of the Stewart Title Guaranty Company and its title affiliates(the Stewart Title Companies),pursuant to Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act(GLBA). The types of personal information we collect and share depend on the product or service that you have sought through us. This information can include social security numbers and driver's license number. All financial companies, such as the Stewart Title Companies, need to share customers' personal information to run their everyday business—to process transactions and maintain customer accounts. In the section below, we list the reasons that we can share customers'personal information;the reasons that we choose to share;and whether you can limit this sharing. Reasons we can share your personal information. Do we share Can you limit this sharing? For our everyday business purposes—to process your transactions and maintain your account.This may include running the business and managing customer accounts,such as processing Yes No transactions,mailing,and auditing services,and responding to court orders and legal investigations. For our marketing purposes—to offer our products and services to Yes No you. For joint marketing with other financial companies No We don't share For our affiliates'everyday business purposes—information about your transactions and experiences.Affiliates are companies related by common ownership or control.They can be financial and Yes No non-financial companies.Our affiliates may include companies with a Stewart name;financial companies,such as Stewart Title Company For our affiliates'everyday business purposes—information No We don't share about your creditworthiness. For our affiliates to market to you—For your convenience, Yes Yes,send your first and last name,the email Stewart has developed a means for you to opt out from its affiliates address used in your transaction, your marketing even though such mechanism is not legally required. Stewart file number and the Stewart office location that is handling your transaction by email to optout@stewart.com or fax to 1-800-335-9591. For non-affiliates to market to you.Non-affiliates are companies No We don't share not related by common ownership or control.They can be financial and non-financial companies. We may disclose your personal information to our affiliates or to non-affiliates as permitted by law. If you request a transaction with a non-affiliate,such as a third party insurance company,we will disclose your personal information to that non-affiliate. [We do not control their subsequent use of information,and suggest you refer to their privacy notices.] SHARING PRACTICES How often do the Stewart Title Companies notify me We must notify you about our sharing practices when you request a about their practices? transaction. How do the Stewart Title Companies protect my To protect your personal information from unauthorized access and use, we personal information? use security measures that comply with federal law. These measures include computer,file, and building safeguards. How do the Stewart Title Companies collect my We collect your personal information,for example,when you personal information? • request insurance-related services • provide such information to us We also collect your personal information from others, such as the real estate agent or lender involved in your transaction,credit reporting agencies, affiliates or other companies. What sharing can I limit? Although federal and state law give you the right to limit sharing (e.g., opt out) in certain instances, we do not share your personal information in those instances. Contact us: If you have any questions about this privacy notice, please contact us at:Stewart Title Guaranty Company, 1980 Post Oak Blvd.,Privacy Officer, Houston,Texas 77056 File No.:05504-10959 Page 1 Revised 11-19-2013 TAX SEARCH REPORT Printed:Tuesday,11 August 2015 11:19 AM Order:05504-10959 Area Code: 1059 Tax Rate: 15.5516 Parcel Number: 225-51-011A6 Docket Book: 5552 Recorded: 06/22/1977 Situs Address: 0 Page: 750 Owners Name:WALTER&JANE WONG FAMILY INVESTMENTS LLLP Address: 5437 E 3RD ST Section: 36 Book: 13 TUCSON AZ Township: 12S Page: 18 85711 Range: 13E Block: B Lot: Legal: SUFFOLK HILLS N150'BLK B EXC SWLY COR THEREOF 2014 TAXES UPDATED THRU 07/15/2015 Value Ratio Land: $256,793.00 16% Improvement: $0.00 0% Full Cash Value Exemption Net Assessed Land& Impr: $256,793.00 $0.00 $41,087.00 Personal Prop: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Limited: $256,793.00 $0.00 2014 TOTAL TAX = $6,389.69 *** 2014 TAXES ROLLED OVER SEE BACK TAX INFORMATION *** NO LIABILITY BACK TAX INFORMATION UPDATED THRU 07/15/2015 **NO DELINQUENT TAXES FOR THIS PARCEL ** UPDATED THRU DATES: ASSESSMENTS RESOLUTIONS CITY OF TUCSON: 07/15/2015 07/15/2015 ORO VALLEY: 07/15/2015 07/15/2015 PIMA COUNTY: 07/15/2015 07/15/2015 **NO ASSESSMENTS ** **NO RESOLUTIONS ** **NO SOLD ASSESSMENTS ** Page 1 of 1 �.v/i r., w, i, rj. . r . •+- a 1` '•4 „[ •.r �, .5,. ,r• .,e �-C ♦ y•`r+, r.r, .n.!-i. M1: ' . I Y. 3 •+ } J t r. ' [f'•, , '':.+r j ♦�„1. '`' :i.11 ,.' - ' ♦I,1 ., f, '• � -� t •1. f♦�,- 7t ' ,• :,/.4 •,)_ I S,.: y It.-• i �jL , \ •Ill-'1%i tit;t<. <`(ra t�tilt it 117 r • , `- i ,n' A�. 4t� � ( f� c�.A:; ti�;11�n r�cC,c`.^:ti �••+a� 7ransportat�on ` •-. 'Iy •f 5 1,.,_* ;•f,,, ++�� ♦ n ServiCCS,3�� +... yt�11 �' 1 ' VI, 1.J11..ta tVt1� •�.y��'� • J-,-': .• , ; .,0•3 s, 13 th s Doi • 3i JAN I S .t�2• 26 �. , .; AZ ` •t . fir,. ,,J ;y'. - "~4 3 �1.1f<i1 'r,•S :L''C!t:;'_!'y j • ;-1 J ':S I,• 47 � ,,. yti Y 7 , i ;' ef+t ' ' �1fi IN ^1�E SUPER/OR COURT OF THE STATE, OF Ai<1 OVt\ `• • i `; . fit, ,Fi b '' `.0� y;- • 4x 9 TNT ,ND FOR THE COUNTY OF PI �e, ,,r, t-a ' :1•,%;11ii. •n~y;b`o;•r�;;,_.. 10 STATE of ARI ONA, ex rel., ) ` `�t, , . .. i ,,,.4.'�'. t . A, ORDWAY, Director, Arizona ) .fit' ;;-L,. ;i,,,<.*.,., :1 , I i Dep.3rt;ncnt of Transportation, ) R3r "i»'i x 'Y' t f ,z - 1 ) NO. 177462 4 r �. 1t,l•» -r,,.%=, 4 °`" `! 12 P1�1;ntiif } - Y •s''.iq;s.>� ' + y�. INAL ORDER or CONDEMNATION 1'a r<' `r` y a+�-' 'i'' y r r 13 v. ) 71r •� p�~`�1 , .-< , /fit. f. d 7 t sY �rSit ,♦ r ♦ ♦ r t 1 ),,,4 �..!' 14 WALrL•R {SONG aka L. W. ,LONG, t • :'ys .'' and •:Ai�E IyGC:r aka S. C. SIONG t •^< ■7 : .; f•k4 15 i��t�;E�.•>nd and wife; LAWYERS ) t.`: �} ; `' j 1: ' .�. - 'TITLE OF ARIZONA, an Arizona ''y``... ' (!_- =, 'K'".y' corporation;o ra !flSk" aa,.t•�Ntit „ ;; ,`�. i5 c �. iOn; PIMA COUNTY ) 4'*- s�g;�+ 7' '3l:„':`:-A•:.:2. ';,,g. TREASURER, ) ! �_ ` _``•, in yr'r £-.ji,<- :1,t, 11 Defendants. ) .4'�°, : i ,',�a': `. 'e. r 19 ' r: It appe�ri.nr to the Court that the Jt:dyit�enC heretofore ,,�.', r ,�,; tk f r....,...-3.:,\. ; • 20 ent:erc,i in this matter has been fully complied with, ,%1,1, Tr;� :•:..' t ti, .i #?'' 21 t I5 ORD£ttFi!J that the propertry ucseribod i.n Exhibit t\ ,�' ♦. , G t rp T r,r sy�, '.''i�i-• y6f'L ,;, ; ' _ 22 i s condemned for state highway purposes _''".•!uat� that title to i••k,r ;.! ' : a f .`.x 23 property, as indicated in Exhibit A, be vested in the State of � ;�, tiy 24 : Arizona upon recording of this Order with the Office of the ,l, z��* , 25 CoL:nty Recorder of t'ie C t,hty in which the property r , 4' • `, ' located. its, 1; Sty DATED: •t^�, ��L, �, f ti•w'r'do a `` q �f 1 t+�,{ro .' /.1" • T. ? • . l' Ji7J(aE.OF Y 1 /(//:/:''''177 t-tg E rt COUit'T ' ' 1 1 f 29 I• c r • i , •' y'. 1. :,.Y r 1s ,.. �4 ,. ''' r. , rSit s..: �,• .. ::?'�'. �.i 1 ri.. V: J `'I��l' •:., i✓f,',/^ ,` .. �!�•� .a":.' �� •I.=.R!.::ir=, x. 4n_ .��� 1 .�•L,y.�y.-� .,•...cr .1•, , �. f `�^yrµ y :�•: +�•'�':.;r •4,�, `�';r'A r 1 ,i/ try t +�%r� �j:e• �'j :,'1's ��:�,::1 .l-�,.:C.e r. v}'j�" -�.�+�. r 'y t. ., -l- � � �� %i,�' ".�i4..5r �. •w� •1 Y -f� 1..':+ ..,,,� �..,r e.f.;.ea r Li -f :.' - -s?':�, •1 r':. 7;�:.. -f,�•,k• i ,S� .s" .� \r�rr.. 1;:. t..t .�`:'f" :1`'��i.'G-714 :?i.�•. .`+S ��It ►:tyi Sr _ _ 1, +: #.t i;:,: '%f,IC�,s.;r.l ;r,. !;7�, .'�:, r. c'7,�jdi spa� '�`�rj � �'� •�1 , ��:.A' 11.C- s i. r { '.f:,'^( .�:i:.��< s�l.i�6f�' .��..++ -x >.a � '•�•. � �`d,.� t f l-2� rY R� � �. ;II:, �•..7�•, ?r• 5 „ai :+` `'- i.� ►t.'.i'.°'�,I;Jrr. �'�r.•' " "•:3'• � =1:•i ,5. .. f ��'+�� � '� � :sti. #''... '_ ! �• fj�'k'•-� � ` ..'',-' ,, M f. 117.'‘''..:4:',1.1...t. f i�jr2 ti l 1 A-:,� ,, ',•'� APPROVED AS TO FORM: a a:, r}L1 {, 2 ',-,' , ,•..k cikr;;;o- t1a ti :tOt3EEt7' K. CO:t3IN ` �•i ,1` f 1 r r•I`. ': 3 ?Attorney General •:,' • ` :Y ' '''t , is • i r ;�/,l t � ';,Y.,. r 1.1. .',9 4,w,` ii Cr"ilt:ti RAMPS + �, ... i � x ri� S r r t s* 4: , -;, `• I, r},��. 6 ;,ssxstar�t Attorney gene:-.11 ,.� • �,`,� ,1aL Attorneys for Plaintiff' �'~ ��- r {r7�{�tTrFi, • i JrV!.trJ: . r ' & TGWNS)rN,.,..c, ��' r ri '4( r 4� > ,i 9 (/, { err:..._. f „ t ::11.. "^:, 4 #”` f 4,,'.,i� 10 Uy; , ; •,,.=., , r� .�• ( � ' «;. t'l r °' r 1 Y, FtOE3E1r C. Sfitliiig- c. I ! c 7 # r - '' _, r, i`uc:�on, 11rizan 83703 j � { ,� '.' f S 12 Attorneys for Defendants r ` } , • ,r��a�:�e , S.rt t1z:t4 D. rat:rF.r:�Y r ���, � , 9 t-R A,• -.,F.�..;i*Yt i�Lrra County Attorney• :.r R t� y..toy�• I.cx•r ,.=+1, 15 i 4.�F = !A-L1 r-` •�i' ' .,r-Y71.1{t' k. 1 j S r'. r i•.l� 4 d�`'1 '4 I s 1 1 rsE'�'�krs!1ar''` 1b , 13y; (11) • `,I_S f >~�• 17 JOHN ELIH USlt iiS �, fJ�p y f lir :7_�r :;ar✓Q.;k 19 At .orneye, for Defendant # t •• J IItS\ COUN':'Y `TREASURER 1 ;, �r{ ' •, c • . ! ••;•i et- r k"r =" • ` • ..,,4.,'":;'••••.=', .,• ;,,../.,..:.,i,X, 2? ti y ?e• • • r rx,';'`;,it' 24 . 4- . .,,,! .,•,....,,/ e. 'i''A'..RY..,i 4,11, . .. _ ..v. : . . yti:„.f,,,ts . , ..,...... ..,p.i..:,:cl, 2e f \ •t...,..,•,:Ir•;-:.?4 ,.y, 29 ri j �- Ys 5;.. • • f r + i, '' 'i� ',;r,, 30 Ii - .R.:i• ', .; 1 1- Y I� 1 1 , `` • y• f ir' f �t' 32 r /r , '�. +' -..kf 11! r •L 4, '`,,• , ' 'is •" r •', L ,1 t ...:V i' •'• ., °7, 1. ;'`r'�r ++,' ., • J ,v •'1 ' r ■ r - i, 1",.31 '''1,/i.rt• 's * 1 +h , ,! •' ``'•. ' j"' 1 1 4 s • ,! '�''t" i�Pi. a•tfY+:':i fS� (t•,I r4 art1'.y.,•;,T.s P'fit. .;i .G�.�'tA,1 - ♦-'.,. 1 i� �.- T1; . re`,.'t., !.}. } /` 1%.?•, �. • •1If , f t • } .\ ,,' t E J!.r y{a ''.�"� as t �; •bC ` �vh it :4 '" }ti,, ,v'k .:i • J`�j,,r• ,,' I• • iat • ,4, 'a 1,• . rl.»: V •t ti r r 1i,•' a; �- :•'I• ,t. '�\., ,, ✓. 's- .,• �''I i?f '"•f ti� t`."FY'. 'wn '., i.l: /+ s1 }, ,r`_•, -• --'•r:.,,, ♦1 .S S n.�•� .j' ; t' �'fy 'y J /tt•. '.,i Y k i'r �irt7 i A}!f , • ..• ,!:.1 ,_ } y..' ,,. :l' - �� A •.f • T� ! Y • t Y ' �i. C, k ,�` 1,:'i -: .3f.) Y .ail .• I 1 '+ : $ , ,� lf..•:�: p.R�� � ` !~'1 j� •3:,�'�'1.r .* ,.$,�<,+,y.."t�u,.. ��,''•� ,t,., ,.*,� � �, �• i. . 1 • {1 S.ti i� `a�.� 'r r 'iw.r 7.Z1•,��♦ ' .'*I�r .�(1� �. , 1� ���� •1 .. a ,:•': •,I4' ,.,}�- ti:•Y! -•.i,. `�!i('�7:w?'��:.i:%J:�i.},'v',r.:,. •,,. .I.; i � 1k • v 1 .( l •f. }� , • ,:r',k vL':ii..\. •ZY,,J,• '•,..y; %• 1•1 ,rri.-'._• :f),tc.A�f4%,' *.:i^ :t _k ..1 :N'�.•..: •:]' ,.�,f. . ..h.,l•1., RnY I-.3 ,. .Jl• r •4tr:�•'l�r^:1J"<:'a YiS` '.:..• .>: i •, i V. r,:N., ,t-'f,r•r' Y.L.�G .t1'•;t�'�,: •r,t'j��.' .1.:,,)� vi� • r• •�'4•'a ZI •'i a s1:1 -i. s • '' ,i }I I•.1•,'.- ,tt;:V. t.. i r:, r t .q y:�k.. :;`, ;• ;1' r, .'•' .,,. .1, , :J•.'r:','x li+ i t, •.• ,::yam•:, ,1•^.5•. .S'�. K i•k'•:r; :.•r'. ,�: t :" i' • ? �_. ,( ..5:• �J 1, pAR. r.'(...• , �: ..: r ' rf � :':,'4.. ��r..: .; t1.� (,k,,r .•t,i"'r .r•:a ';•, ;.:t. +'rr :,r•" 'r.r '•,. ,_n ,•err.: ..�..!t Flit:, :i' ~i�, 't J r • t. 'r:'• 1. /;' `err''+ rr: t7:'••' 11 '•,LI • 1. i. k t'>' •fa it r 1 ` Y ns:• 1.';t••r,r "'w :'3:" t' • I � 1 . ., f' • •3 , :•r y ! c i '4 �.f` 'S +r.: • a J t 'l i' •t. "i• 1 1•• i:. .(4, '41%.,i 4;-,.o,,, ..• • • ••• • • 'I 1,',`,''(•t II»tj2 E•, 'i q .s r:: • ! • 1 III '� •<:'t°;.r�.. .1..••r •.t e T:l •, I 1 R` 7. s..,_ • • 'r•. I?i C,i Tt 11. I ti t II',I:.3 a - I aJ11�rr('1 lit' 1tc)tt:; ,r ,, pp , ;f� t•� I.;.:..• :I.ii:i.:Lr!i •• ,,10-III 8 'lir'•cl .l0';,'() 1 ,i • ! 1 'f rrir:1 • • • •• 'PA'I'l .: :I.. ,i1c Volivi` I.i, 19�I1I : ,1. • • 'I :r• V�, • .�r • 9 +• •• • �,t , i I. • ., • • • •.I 1_n •.1, il•1, :'t•...L'- mar �,:` !,4 `t, r , :dlrf_ t..)t„a1:.t:Idh c l'iai . • ;•: i ,,'_-� . r • 'i' • .'1•� Ii;I hWi'y •la) 1r):ion: :11! » ;' t • • •3111 • ", • F #a.. E .: '' , I• •t:•r.,iuit,l, 'iti�>l�:r.•�rt:rrrtc! 't:o. .. •.. r �•.� l 'r I ( 1 .•!ritic. :li:,u curl i n LlIr i1{'. II.;,•,.,Ul.i O„I''1l1.I,l ' , i.t. I1. n +.. 1, ;. iiii.'•'rlli'ri,:t1. I n t rvii.: 7 , :'• . ' , rr); lo.::,lrJ..r1I ilj, 1♦{1 my•i)l/lti o, • • 1,,'t 1,:IItlliti:;tti:'1)'U1Jr 1•v, .ip(:r)i'ct:)::C:: 'i .tIJ.p •�C).Ji1L' ;i"; / 4 r ' .At•I•v11rl:i •iii',1•'1lr::i':1.3 bcs{t'•:i:i••:1'61'1 t)Wi3 i; . . Y I ^�.,,� IL t, ta.l 'i• .� • • • L :r • J' 0' ,' All't.Ii,i t. 'ic) t .� r /� 7•":r ,r i,; .LIP' I Of .r ry �' 1 t 1 n ){:::..1. !•:.`13l(k.c.. Lt ..i 1?i'1'Q i'I{' �[ f' y , •. { ' •:c)ilt•11(.1'.ly a:IQ Wu:,t.vt'iy•Ol' .trittil`':i'r13,1c)illn8 th'ii,i lbeti 3.1r o a; ti 'J,.1 li • t• • r, • r,'t)ria711!rl{:1.fIJ'; ':lt:. 1.111► :i'IAtltllV�:tilt trn�r • •}' • .:.> J1 , ►..`t.1l, R r Y { . riot I,11'.•tine C�.Ya,tl':,�6 i ntintclil , •4ts , } '' A r i •.'s111.it, ;itil ',0.",1 3 'I,:titir•.::tt.i•.1 ,;'illf}i ilitl l ' ,.. p.�2 r ,f 14, y t•, ,(�r , •• � .l.�•.Iti'rri'•iile.ie? :init.�ierlrl.l;ltl, •' , /� •>., 1 � + • .r ilrit: .,:.'• `tll),�,t.�i,•''•i`IL<3:::I.)I71it,11:•'j;3, 110 'tl{)..•�;�t:lt; along f •: ..' i', +L�. • .,•nur,1)'• 11•rlo L;lel •6r• •1;.;•di t3t•a ,.,4 )]fl t:na • . - .,.':l'c � .'tiiite���it.. :s1?.Ob •rQLt;•••t;a L'itC.C:{39�':1J1(;.• .r •. . .: • �'+. ' �'r'�`-' �;, , .� aetitr•.1 r11 a.i' I1.5. :1II1,1twtly.::89..(it`•fi:tIon-•I_ Ot•nc:1.e•.?et. - 01ob , ,. ,E .,,: i.3 IfilU:I ) •t'hnttt'a'••r} tl;•.:I;Qca.r..JI','tnj c.i11:'Pent it)l{ 01 IHO;,t:11 0" 'fit } ' 1 3 tan1:: •• R + r t ' 1 i.3•l;'t ' •• 1,�i� 21I, 1±:.:J L iI.L' •' r . s. , �' 1 r ,t 11i, 'ii:i•1,1...0'{�•.'i1•.•Cni;'.,.er:•It1•t?i'3 s 110,•• n�.l)11G the;Arr.': r ,,,)•'., g •. ', , /,, ;I• nui►ve.'tcr. 1,11ct .13lrltt• 11c1vmi1t;;;rl:-1'riltLoa•+.,r la jpr� G r: ,, `�, :. • • c, a'or: t13 � ,,. 0 9� 1• t'tcL' , a r �' �+• F• ,ram 1 i .. 'ir I. t.•.)t1r:1 n I. i� ''!vv•f;� :LilCltc•o�'1'1�••t't.11 10°''Z�1 all It t5t1g V • •'. ' r : f.:,:ra: iI-, 't' • • 1:C1 ;.J,rilt.itli�'i11C1111"'':ill {1 C s. 4,..t, • ''t `' ;;,, ; ,,. •• ici1.ir1nt ;per) line, Lii6L'�1Cu t:' +••:�•,1•r'::: . t<, y -i:•, )',..0 '1 j rr:o. t,ii0 t•(.• •' i 7 O t t• Qf. #wy•,• '.. r,:r�_,����x'�•-��- >. • '; .. ,� n •I .t'9 3 .�a l:nrt r'�.3 0�.{�a rc:�_t: tl�;.: � •'��;: 1 fir', tt '� r; :: xii s i > .. • • .i-.I�ilttl,i:1,~o i::.tli OIll.tI 1IIlt:OIiiIt:ef�1, .rl.(tlL ar'•i ,`;' ;�: ';a :a•F.?' . .;�'1S'•-r ;l ia' (1�` lar Lr1 i.1.:i • r y' t. .ay 4. ti •) «.:��:< r. , •h.i,r.liw l;v;'i139' cciri.I io;11:•w c •. -": i'::.,.K. •' 'rlit! ,I .. tl If Jel r•: . ' y '_,` '1:.tt " .. :. ,�; I i. 1' :ILO. :1It7t:k 1✓ tihonc.C`' I (0 J • rl T7 00 .b:; ,i :Xz. i. 1,7 rr •,,.,. •1'n•'411•76 i,9.•,-'1};l L•mo-; 117♦ • • ,r• .,,'•-:i'': ... .t-t.L; thent:Q••,0 1 0:.• t:.:•Yt' "• ':•.ra ' , r + NI :•, Ut;,i>-J.U,. l.tj;.. •.3� •��,'+.!:it:'1.11)r 39••rPe�i: to tiro Point .. :;z.' , '� ¢ . ;�t' ,iltltit;; •:,rt the t3c�ii yi:l na . if at:1t1 Dlock'r,L;,e 1 +,l):irr.7,',"l; . r • l-.Ik rl i i } r5'•` ' e,• • t11• tt f �34{1t11't3 t'!'C tr r }•\'. 1� .J r »`�•i;t „ -1 1•• 1 i{ l I. .•C r lt.c):i••': • • • ✓rrf:.', i{r�}? l ate`• r .1 i?;`• it t: fir-:• r, I'l i, kir ''V" .,1 1\ 'I'll%it, 1){)i'i..lnit {)1' trlle'IIC?)'tilt:;1',Q root .i..:II ri t 4• j"ti 411 rtlr:'lliillt;{ i 1 r CC .ati Or a.rorealtid 'B1our. 1 '' ' �;1' ,� 1', ` t 11 t 11M;,6li't. •WCit I. :1•1.no I:l;ni'rof,..wh.k9,11•'lie& c'r. thi..tt: • . r a;�" ,,(7 • • tr1 t 1o3,1owi g �'.yx'.. ,•t' Or a,.'tildt:: r..M.;1; ., 'i :i I' '' ,i t. •..r,4 �,i. .\t•,. ..,••,} 'f'1;•,1 fit:'. • F' [ �i: •r .t , f r :.,_ :.;. ., • • •i; !, :t �1 t t� >z't; .:orl)ri. '{ti•1''.�tf•� '• ' .r; ',{R:iY:, • fore i :5uc.(;toit ry t:tie•n:tt• � ,. ; �` ' .. •':� • th t) 3 IC1 ;llrttet'';.1i:l oiti;:; ,1 ,�; ,1a':� ..,«;,i ;E'.,v�'1+' tA'� ' �>rh ,FJtrI',41K',•1irlc,;ar::3ilfCj 3{:Ct'rS.Ott . . ,:: `'i''Y.'�¢;,':',y:-V:•• .a-_3i.: :.y ••� 'I I rev., I, r. , J r`,., •-:Q •S , tP, f ` '`�- , , 1•'��li!`f+X.1. i::kittr:CCltt:l:lt7:1.1 i`.'t r'. tillwi.I;j Ilc) ,'il{:. . t�,'' �• 1' r.rti:I{N) —•0P:,i:.1i1:',.1.1;I• '.`_','.(I I:ob•t..rrlli "Ili•l t ' 1 :' n; 1: ' >! ;,' •. T ,, rl •yr;),.0r,'; I' i is ?Y 3'•-'1;.t>wt'1i:r.: Sou ta)`'.1.0 :�Iri • • ;,:��.{::5.:•. t a • r ;i .��.' ',. • +., ,ZI1t `1�f:i,it :t•i:Or1 :i il'1.t! i�; '•L..r+�':1' �':• e' .'. ' ••t:.l; • •g:':.;:•, `. ;•'. •i\ , ,s.•aa • • ':, f.`' . ,1i ,ti1.r• (Fen') l,,,',:;G-, :Irr�t:•. :•Lt1t:tn iw'%.: ! .A., !, 1 ':.. .:�; '•a)g:;k ::;oil l' rt:.l •t //'�1!. f;' 4,1•• , .i. 1 *ti. i: ,,.. 'jst��y. •.. jut,I`1 1 •1V, 1 r .>: t'• 'JI ,. I,. ',.. :I.: :4 L'+1 �'.:: .�,._ .r� 3: .i'i1 L•• .1t3J;/�t1i)'��,!' ci f:'":' �•. .;'::. ' ,. . :>� .., G :t. :.C11�,:.!ltlll °•'1 J,C1'tI.•01 ��' t f �'Nil I: • 1J TN -� >< , � ti•: Y . Kl t'�;�6�';''wu,/�;•lirlo �ci,.•`z;•��lt!• '•:�* V .:'::t: �3 .r I,I wrY':U9,:'t,•1"I:,�iit1�.>.t:,iiiit:'lntil •�� ��' �r..'!a.' .,;.,;; � �:;•! �..�,,� , , nl•' ,pul:11 79 l3 '•1 �1'� is .t ,!• • '.!i!1►00.'l'aoC,•.'1:11011u@''I3Ui11t11:::7,if"16I ri)" Wont.t ' • .'�'`' • /• t >r ,•: i��'t� 11 >' o• n � •� � 1'� 1 , 1A•I);Cu•:!'4'O r;�''t 11Qt'iCQ.'' .. -tt::': � ,f if, ,. iL /• '-{ • r r't'.1i r� 3! '�3tU Wit;it:°,:.:►a'U�Jn•=feet;•to *aid nx3•ot:ing cnatclr]y f 4 •,t tip..1i. rl,li•hi 01• w1ly .1IIL()...o!':t+•ii•.: 11ii;hwtiy 139; tiileo1CC)::Not`1,:1'1 10° 76I. ! •:•, _ "' : is t•j ,r c 1.F"•1. • • :,'`;:...I;IIis liiiclt.,.•':l3•7t13T.:l;lllcl:.'C:xitltttlp.•'•1:L•liltot.'V•I`ljjlit,.:•Or...Wa 1inc.,7.;r•: :;-. .,.. '�, -,•-_.'. `: :: f:,: , (e +> li,er •uotuket;'r1t 71,=':PQINT:.citt,UL :t,:,.'•;,- *,;��f' ,:.�, -.,••,... �, ,•. •�:• ,fir.. ,�:� .v:.• .4• 0.[NNIN{i�- -:., . . 1•';.:••',:i' .,•�' .:,.: • .. •, :.(a ••,. • 'i. i•r:Y._.i1,•i..•. 0:a'✓ fl'...5, •i+ . .;•. -fir' 1, • a:4•' r ,M :f f 1 Sf. 1 1 'Y'• .!� !• �. loot itri5 '���° r 1 .:' p • • %:i• i,,t, .d':• ,:,:` ';.':.'t 1,•` „'.-•*(.; yr i7: •7 .. rt•:•i { t1 r'�3 yt ,. `4y ,••i.x 11 r' .c .t r Y t .n';. r1 rr / 5 l 'c a 'r• •s t,' , 'i .h _ r• p t. i• N�• s i S t ,i t "ii .r.y .v, j :fig 4, r: A A .Yj' III. J c µ., \ w,K: n dS I :I' X it• >j- • • • t''^ , •.Ii T fi' "!. F -t•i`.; x • 9.1....... . , .. h..1:+a .ite`.;d••, ,�:•� } . . :''••, '''•:„,'',4"t-`•.c•''" --:--- •,.• -.,. ..-,3„: • •- it ,' "' '• ' -. i'. •• ,..-•,‘ ; '..- ' '•,•.-,'i..;,:.1•::,...,7— —'—ki ..,,, , .,.. , , ,,":',,,...1., r E\;. r....k '\:.• .s., ' ! •4 I ',11 ',',' , , ....?1..t, fel :"„. N, . 1.;,•-• I i ,-,•.,,.*.\\N•.\-_,-,..2.'„,..., ,,-,4:-•,-, • ./... '7•24-: -77.,,ti,•,,,1-- 4.' ..••••',. . '' tir ' ' "4 'I l• • ki.,..• . ,,,,,,..i., .... ,.. \ ,. ,..y , I .t. • , .A i ,i , • \,• •,••••;, ,,•,.4' ' . /,,, •', „•,,, . . \/.S.AN... I ' • './ 4.*.‘:c, • ,. ''.f .11 / , t:,/ ,,'•:‘. 's,',00/.•,:',, b • 7• -)..••• .:•• ,i ., •,, " ••,11k. ' • ,..`•-, ,•,',....V•i:-IV1-,-\;,\•1, 4, :.;.,.:,.,•.•„•;',•':;-),k: •-•••!,,:',11,(,- 4 •i,i t1 : ' ' •,•,-;••• t•:,-!:',.:•!4,3:1'-ft.,.-:•,••./\.0,1 . e ^ . •. :I..'.........."A':-';kg•tv 7'•.',. ;;!:-.1. ,-•.-;:'•'„It ix.', • 1,',\:• is • 6‘.' .,.... _ .,.. .1.,..,,,• ,,...\. , ...:......,(..4_,:ii lAT'i k l es'''1•''2-,.1..,;S;.'-..,.7i..'.l1:-I'','•%--:'s5.1 .it • .. \, I !• •1 \ Ni1: I, ' . ••;..; ..`,,, ii":„--11.4/r1,!1;;•4:• 1 A ,... :•• ;,•;:rx:ss;.1-,',:.:e. „ ,•4 V, 1,,•.;;V,•. t- $•,-,4'„I 4,,,..- ,, .,....,. '4•'•V t iii.4.74 .....-................-11i...g., -..,,;:''•JI. 4.. ri : • -4.f ';!''i.4. — ,••.. •:: -11 .. t ,,j•' 41;1:''': .7 :!:'i• ' .• '. ..'7.'' ,••,•,,-;•.!?:' \ c, •.,,. •,/,..„.! , 1,.) 'N 14'let.;,1' .' :,.4.-• '4 ;'‘r /0.--11'44 ...i,'`11',j.'i',: A',‘.... :• 4.-t.k :.rr& •,, ; •'•,.‘t.r::..:...t..,4i 4',•.4, .;' tif--.„;,,/•,•11',.- -•,\?'-''.! -&11''• tl 'ir:•i F"..,,-,....y.,:•'.44.:,C''.., -:''1':•Ir..... .s• Itl•Ci:\.",-..4:ifi',,.'j;.;*1'it 14, '• 4' is.'•,,,,, ':,L 1 4 - .,,..,. x••)., .i . 18,,,i •, . '''••• a. '',ts,'- ,f,•''',' • i 3v,' •' , 7...•-• . • „ -,:.• \‘‘ea...,,, k. -,•-• -;• •'''Z',,• ,-- ' Yit\''••\,116i.:' I- ':'• -•-• .. • -'' ,r'', •-; ' •;-';"-.:::,k3 .-••.• V-.'‘itii,„1/4A;;; .1 ' ,.• ,. ••'• ••• ,,,,•- \IN:...,'•':::,'7,..,.,7 , ,,•,.,-...,... .•,I, ''''' -''': t.441,,,'. ---lrf,. .fttl;• • ;/• • ," •••.: ...„4,. s•-$.,,,; r,ir.1 „ i•-,-.'•,, • • l• .• , ..,. . ‘ '4,1 • o, •'t .. I ,1 It. A •*;•I 'I- '. ',.:‘ •!';'• *,•••s 4;!-I, 1..; " (•,- '1,1.:r.: 0• 4.b•,, .• ;I ir,,-.,,,,'.,,.0„...,0,.• • • - .,. ,‘ ._,,, , - ., •,.!. :.!'- ,,, i, i.). 94C,,,...-•,,,. ....l\t,.,•: , „re,... ,...i..•:.:•,,,„ '•-• .:,•'I',',1'.:.•;, ,.:•,':-• :h r411 ,...c••.,'-• :•,),,,,... ' ....,-.:5 -4-..,,,..,..., i• ••, ••••,. •44,''', • ,• .. ,•:.4• :''.'' -1' f:,k ' . :...'-•;'.,'" ...,•'. • it..t.1- •,: •-•• ,si •"..., i ..;-.1`it• .'!•,cli.ts,..T.-k. ,I•-,''..• ,"•.,..-.:.:•,';.--...,;:.'?' =..t']..,7‘..;•.4.r.-1 4.--.;:e::\i'' ,.:-• •:, •-•1 - - 1.••t • ,....••:•,.,,..-..,z'f", :.t:f 7!,i, Oi:41:.•:,,tit.:::::':jt::ti(':: , .......•,.--•..." . ) ,t 74k,:.:.'elf.Y:,:1;:.'ii;..i...• - */-4-4.-.'.,‘t'-:•=t -•-. ,,,. ,. , :.‘ei'',....'');'.•:':'• ".'t,*•,'"i ,?.‘,.',,`,,,•-•,':',.."-'•1' ;......'..i.''''!',* .., ,-f..•:.•'-:.-....lirl'Y:j.:'..,`A-r-4 8TAT OP lig IZOLIA. ) . • '- ---, --- ' - • r-.. _ ,.. ... r•'... .,:i,i4r.A....-.:.. COUNTY OF Fltiikl,_„-) — ., -,--ir.••,--.4;.•;,:-..i:..ei.... .,1i.-.•>•.-4.44.:•::..,,/-::',,'-',,:l 'It e•f:o ree_ai,ne Instrument is a at 250'7.'2 full -. t-ihi.a., ur 48•cri i4t C., py of th 9 o ..—.2..- ce--, .!:,...,,,,.4-i.,..,...,..,.1.,,.... :,-`.... ... s....:;:-.:;..:'.. . . -,,_.J.-•a-4 ,.....ii‘a.' /'', .:•::,,i;•;:•:' cf'.s.N..4.1...... Prlginal op fi. •i.n this offlo)s. ..'.:.: , -' ,•'-',,',,, , ,,,..-,•''.•.i.---:tore.4%,-;,,,, ,,..,-..4,,,,..,,,,.4„,,„,...,•,,,,, ,,,,..:-,,,,,,,•,,..... ..-,I.,.„, moiXtb C414.its •',Di-RD •:• 1` .61,.., •4 t. , ',!*, . , ''-1,:,:'14,f'-',,„...^"i";:'te,':-i'3'`.., (::-.>'-S4 t''''''' .' . ,'"" • 7P• 9-r--/--- -, - r . ••'. c,..2,.• 0-,;;; ;.;.--•‘'''•-,:i<4.:.'``.:.:`:...;? .. . . ..;-• ;:lit'•-t.. 04Nsyytlerk . SU%fl Aftleilil i ,.. .. ,. --5.1.'..",, ,,',.;.:1;f2,i-;•''Z','-' r'k , . * CA.Jr.tY 01 Pins ',..).-v.,.-,' ''''.. .H. •. eput7 1 hrtiby tvrtify that th.initnr 1- •;,*/: , ' '•:,••:'• •,•:,1•,,-•'1.'x.;•`1,. ''''' i. 1111C was Net W recili g at topMt-'/-..!;'- ' ,.f• (:: • ,, 11 . , I ' . . ''' - , , ' '.•...";'',...:dt!rt:.:;:+:`,1:::....1.:'• ' 4'''' ',-'i'.'• ..,4s4 p 1 Ari.0,,••,:rgiiiilifirir 4:Ellittite, --- .,'•,: .. .; . ..ti:1 i 1 -:;•-• - •it •. . .. . . . • I I. • C01.941"(j WiVitis mr hivid end Ctf1;:ler Stoo l , •.... . . . 1 6 • ,.... . . tW yea*boys*len .,*'ft•C J.IMNPIEDY rAinitr R• 'or Illtkilrgg•tl'' „... ' •,•'.;..'i 6483l. 863 • : '• . . .• ,,,,,•/ . . . . r.,-.., ... , .... i , • i ,, ,..... .; . -:. .....‘..,„.: ......„ . . ..„„ ...... .... ......... ............. .. .. . ,._ . .... . . . } 11111111110 1111111111 IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIf�lllllllllllllllllllllllllIII SEQUENCE: 20142760423 No. Pages: 3 10/3/2014 2:35 PM ty F. ANN RODRIGUEZ, RECORDER ,, Recorded By: HEM(e-recordin. tt0? Recording Requested by: Title Security Agency, LLC When recorded mail to: Tucson Koi&Water Gardens, LLC 3320 E. Allen Tucson,AZ 85718 WARRANTY DEED File No. 5570816 (JAS) For the consideration of TEN AND NO/100 DOLLARS, and other valuable considerations, I or we, Walter & Jane Wong Family Investments, LLLP, an Arizona limited liability limited partnership, the GRANTOR does hereby convey to Tucson Koi&Water Gardens, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, the GRANTEE the following described real property situate in Pima County, Arizona: SEE EXHIBIT"A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION ATTACHED HERETO AND BY REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. Subject To: Existing taxes, assessments, covenants, conditions, restrictions, rights of way, easements and all other matters of record. And the GRANTOR does warrant the title against all persons whomsoever, subject to the matters set forth above. DATED: September 30, 2014 Walter&Jane Wong Family lnv. LLLP, an Arizona limited liability limited partnership By:Tucson W&J Wong Company, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, General Manager By:Wong Trust A., Member Manager By: Ja e Wong, Try . ee Page 1 of 3 08/10/2015 9:04 AM r ... * E RECORDING * Page 2 of 3 Sequence No. 20142760423 File No.: 5570816 (JAS) Warranty Deed -continued A.P.N.: 225-51-011A STATE OF ) )ss. County of I /9'2 G` ) On 0 Ci / (2.0 / 1/ , before me, the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared Jane Wong, personally known to me(or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence)to be the person(s)whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies)and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the per on(s)or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. 2-. My Commission Expires: i 0 — z9-. 9 No ry Public e JANICE A.SAUNDERS ft..-.i\ Notary Public-Arizona ,V,;'`;.� k Pima County My Commission Expires • • November 21,2014 Page 2 of 3 08/1012015 9:04 AM * E RECORDING * Page 3 of 3 Sequence No. 20142760423 EXHIBIT"A" Escrow No. 5570816(JAS) ALL THAT PART OF BLOCK"B"OF SUFFOLK HILLS,A SUBDIVISION OF PIMA COUNTY,ARIZONA,ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA, IN BOOK 13 OF MAPS AND PLATS AT PAGE 18 THEREOF, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:TO-WIT: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK"B"; THENCE SOUTH 10 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 10 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID BLOCK"B", 150 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 29 SECONDS EAST,406.52 FEET TO A POINT IN THE EAST LINE OF BLOCK"B"; THENCE NORTH 10 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 10 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID BLOCK"B", 135 FEET; THENCE NORTH 39 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 10 SECONDS WEST, 19.23 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 29 SECONDS WEST,ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF BLOCK"B",391.52 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION AS SET FORTH IN ORDER RECORDED IN DOCKET 5995, PAGE 1062, AND THEREAFTER FINAL ORDER OF CONDEMNATION RECORDED IN DOCKET 6483, PAGE 860. Page 1 of 1 Page 3 of 3 08/10/2015 9:04 AM TAX SEARCH REPORT Printed:Tuesday,11 August 2015 11:28 AM Order:05504-10959 Area Code: 1059 Tax Rate: 15.5516 Parcel Number: 225-51-012A7 Docket Book: 0 Recorded: 03/28/2014 Situs Address: 0 Page: 0 Owners Name: RAMIREZ-GOLDBERG PROPERTIES LLC Address: 3372 N DODGE BLVD Section: 36 Book: 13 TUCSON AZ Township: 12S Page: 18 85716 Range: 13E Block: B Lot: Legal: SUFFOLK HILLS S155'N305'BLK B EXC PCL IN NWLY PTN THEREOF 2014 TAXES UPDATED THRU 07/15/2015 Value Ratio Land: $212,450.00 16% Improvement: $0.00 0% Full Cash Value Exemption Net Assessed Land& Impr: $212,450.00 $0.00 $33,992.00 Personal Prop: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Limited: $212,450.00 $0.00 2014 TOTAL TAX = $5,286.30 *** 2014 TAXES ROLLED OVER SEE BACK TAX INFORMATION *** NO LIABILITY BACK TAX INFORMATION UPDATED THRU 07/15/2015 **NO DELINQUENT TAXES FOR THIS PARCEL ** UPDATED THRU DATES: ASSESSMENTS RESOLUTIONS CITY OF TUCSON: 07/15/2015 07/15/2015 ORO VALLEY: 07/15/2015 07/15/2015 PIMA COUNTY: 07/15/2015 07/15/2015 **NO ASSESSMENTS ** **NO RESOLUTIONS ** **NO SOLD ASSESSMENTS ** Page 1 of 1 Ttif!, f. r Y 1 '.#i . • - , .!•.J I�ai,. 1' :'., ,Y. 'may'- M r,",.. .�. ..•.�•,,,,y ,' ' , ; 1: '--, + •! t-...- 1:., s ti '.,,, i;}. t}i', •,x s+,rrf �t III, ;\ * .:,.r-: lid',sr', :v.1 N., ,:1 .. • -? �1 '� 'k 1•i P� 1,•• 1 -r•t j M•; lli 4 ,�yt � -...,,� (.ice:!:.;,, `:,. r,�•, F , r g�ti. 1 1 • �:� J fi r I .S. �. ,�1\ �l:. il. 1'• la ate^ ,� t �.� < g6 <� 7 , TITTS DOC11) T•1S EZIltG RECOEBD'!D AT.THE SST C}F TEE STATE CV PRIZONA 4 r ",•1 iT 4' t When recorded nail totState of Arizotta Dtgatt sutnt.of Trans o 'F•nation RNSs '-•;ir,, ;"e :, ., , •i Phoenix,'la ` F '�`'� . Section, 330E it.`� `' ' < :, , .-e5007, '. E.r' • N, , .fir,.. t', Est:. No. &99G&372'•3 • s ,t,,:k t e• f ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF'i RANSP{)RTATION ' :.1 ••,•... , ,,,I;;,,T:'. '.stke ;` al •) '' ';` it -ti '' 11t' r l. � ,. 31 +r r r A n i 1�ra w, `,,• , y,h, ,:, r.II,'!r I;\t11� .1,-E. if"r.\ 1!1' THESE PRESENT:- , t;.; Fred Wolf and tinily R•;:.•Wolf, husband and wife '•'q.. ,.r ._ i0. '. ,;: .! (irntm,r, fur rh.•f•a,n„itlerretian or ONE Ali? NO.100 $1.UI} p tii •� .1'' F�}E k{r •`. .i fi :•~ =-' k C'{1ti•:II)'•'ii,1TI[1ti dne>K 31t>rlah {` �,_DOLLARS AND (1'THI�,Ii 1•.1I.t I�RI,� s:,t • .� z •• �rnat,ttlnYn} nnei warrant la thr STATE OF,llil%�3 :1 I»' slnct rlt'nte;:I: ; '"` • > ire 1)4.1mrtnivni lit Trnnrixvintion,Grantee, Ihr hPeri mallet drnvriiieit mai prOpe,rly siimiceil in • ay :f� ` .��] r ti Pi'iia t'ac I . nn arc;rnrr r ,r I,uc n) Ari o i•lllnrl (1,,,yrii•,•11 u ' I -•.'— f- t ��. ti :'hut portion o!' the Soutil •1»,00 feet or t?te Nort;lh 3C':.00 feet of n1.0 .: nr.,7, %/ �, ¢'�'• ' a. > ..,.." �.,e ,.1 .•f>:, `i,Y'• .y, 11,/r.,ra r1..1.L,I�:, according to tilt n�.z:t of record in look.' ,3 or 1'iana at nr.:!-+: ,,r:, •/ �_�"�� 50 �:i`. s, ,• -i ,� records or Pima Cocutl;y, Arizona, au tittsurera alon- the West line of so.1.•i • :�"t ' ylr',, E , ,..i,,,,, ,j ' 31ac�: ".3", :v;11,ch lies within the follo,'ri.n, described tract r,f land: r,. • ,i ,tip rI ' �' �.., -ir1. theNorthwest n • t est corneroi' SectiOrir• t . - '�•''41 ., �'f',.; ,�. :� �inr� at 'iG, +'oYrn�hit� 12 3vlzLh, R3t1=;e `:.�1 i r. *-,!l r r� ...dzN .' ,:il'3t, Oils; and Salt River Meridian, Pima County, ArizorI., thence South • t C •'' 2,, `:i,'I;: ,:�° 9• r Ion i a.G along the ;forth line distance f' ? 31 feet �v -' a f; n thereof', a d nae o. 1,�G.1 • �• ;.c, ';4.;1,4tl��e. `o. tie exi,atinr; centerline of U.S. 1ltr,hway 99 (Tucson*- Oracle Jet., - Cilo:*e ,"'•Yc�•"",1titt ',T.Z't 1, .I ',•1,r'-; r,.:)" s'3y'noos'otV$10° 6f r 9 1 e Y• *. •'�"` 3 t 'fir '� t. ,tia..r , � :i.1 -,3�J West {►,-.ott�:..t�.;�f £.��:,C ',':;' centerline, ,. •I• ,';Iq`f {S{ , '1•' '-: ,a di:;tance ori0�,7•,'3 feet' thence Saute• 730:n 1 n 4A `.: 10U 0 il;�I . 1•,ry'.i: 1 .t1: o., , 3 ' 0 s :0 foot t t o t h c� - f //,:y ,� %,ciluti:; `•t, 6'kii. n:)Z,:rl (1,, RE0l�1 INQ on the existing easterly right at' way line of s ale -.•r ` .0 I t r S " •• Iway 39, thence coritJnuinr; Sough 79° 43' 3O=r bast 50.00 feet• thence • <,'. 'J"r , t-, N ;,auto 1.0 lfi t)0 Wes ' 1 'r ti ty�ri' '� o , i Ir t 100.00 feet; thence Ptort+h 7Si° 4.3' :011 'VJe9t: g0.,?Q �• 1'1i. 5 y ,'t 4'(�a' to �'.Ct id a ist4 T y t !•1 ., t e ,' ,; , „',. , x ...n,, a&sterl;r ri ,h,. .of way lino of II.$. Highway 89, thRnC•. 4t 'd. I `- - } ? Iorvh 1.0° 16' 50" East along said existing easterly rij't c+,` w*y line, a .� 'i �'`'y "r•, r ' ri" uiatance of.100.00 reef to the TRUE POINTor tiEGI?V, ItUO. ' t • ,,•i' ,j,..:,.,\,,„,,,c, , .,,,,f, ... -1;•:=',.':.•",.',,,sv,..--.;,, .`-,.. •, 14: 0 . 'AI • . • .......,-;. -;i•,••,,,,.44:;?...:'..:. t • t • { K a la d x (i • /h 1t . 7".1 J ice" 4:;.. ,�x^5�'r ! • • • r"r•S: • t;' ' r • r ,i �� j. i +t ,,ii'1'• f41' o.ta - 4fLa ! I t� { • ri • 'ff • ,u.� ;,, i � • • • • • • • • • • • • .• rIi 'r .. ?rr rr,' r' I! • „ :d ?lt.rr/ • • i'r,i' , r r C:r r • i. .. .i< ,r 4t N '1 .: �Z.. i2 '.r r• :N •l' • =,r • • • •t: • ..... ,. '•tad '�i'..I: : r.!•:..:4.. 'r..:.; ,. .. "r', r '« I'rrrjret Ni,.:.Z2:1a:s .l..i...Sootloi'`Stt aad :,T ri'1Q.: 1 P,itoei:: 10` l ., 'L,';, :x;_ ;. • IN.:_ r 1- .r 7 N.i A L - ll • • • �. -r M1 ` .J • i �• I ;r ` • • • I' , ato.. r 4_Y� !' st: :•r l q r - 1.•• ,{•: w 1 't �t Y' : , :'E:r:.i•.� I, • .•r `l i'i�•:3..Ic , •/fir.`.. 7 y,'•,� � f ..n: .1•... !:t':::i ..,i:1'•r`-+i.. r ' 441 lk nt was ackno Ca . Commissinm —`—.. Sao APS fu VOL —_—__....... ................. F. ANN RODRIGUEZ, RECORDER 11111113110111101111111111111110110111111IIIII)Recorded By: JJE vo,PjM DEPUTY RECORDER ���/ \C' SEQUENCE: 20140870432 4911 !W �; 41 NO. RAGES: 3 GGAD `�' �d!, y I 03 28 2014 N b WTDEED � � MK CONSULTANTS-GADARIAN 13:57 PICKUP PICK UP AMOUNT PAID: $9.00 RECORDING REQUESTED BY Recording Data: AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: GADARIAN&CACY,P.L.L.C. 2200 East River Road, Suite 123 Tucson,Arizona 85718 MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO: Ramirez-Goldberg Properties,L.L.C. 3372 N. Dodge Blvd. Tucson,AZ 85716 Exemption: A.R.S. § 11-1134 B 7(c) SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED For the consideration of Ten Dollars,and other valuable consideration, TUCSON KOI AND WATER GARDENS,LLC,an Arizona limited liability company hereby conveys to RAMIREZ-GOLDBERG PROPERTIES,L.L.C.,an Arizona limited liability company all right,title,and interest in the real property situated in Pima County, State of Arizona described as follows: Legal description attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. This Deed is intended to convey the real property located at Magee and Oracle in Pima County,also known as Tax Code Parcel No. 225-51-012A. The legal description herein is taken from that certain instrument recorded on September 30, 2013, sequence number 20132730235 and is intended to be identical to the legal description contained in that instrument. Page3of 3 08/08/2015 12:40 PM Page 2 of 3 Sequence No. 20140870432 Subject to:current taxes and other assessments,reservations in patents and all easements,rights of way, encumbrances, liens, covenants, conditions, restrictions, obligations and liabilities as may appear of record or otherwise. Grantor warrants title as against all of Grantor's acts and no other acts and subject to all taxes, conditions, covenants, restrictions, reservations, easements, encumbrances and matters of record. The Affidavit and fee required under A.R.S.§ 11-1132 and 1133 do not apply to this transfer because the transfer is exempt under A.R.S. § 11-1134 B 7 (c). DATED: 3k.� �/ ,2014. Tucson Koi and Water Gardens,L.L.C. By: ' Title: Manager STATE OF ARIZONA ) )ss. County of Pima ) SUBSCRIBED, SWORN TO and ACKNOWLEDGED before me this gaik" day of ,2014,by Jim C. Ramirez,as Manager of Tucson Koi and Water Gardens,LLC. STEPHANIE RUSNAK Notary Public-Arizona 9(24-A. Pima County • ° My Commission Expires otary Public June 25,2016 IM7 .....s.Sao.CVr..ellorI IMy U.C�1 f 11 4.4N ri �b 7w-O r ie 'Y 0.116,PD 2 14C Page 2 of 3 08/08/2015 12:40 PM Page 3 of 3 Sequence No. 20140870432 EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description ALL THAT PART OF BLOCK"6"OF SUFFOLK HILLS,A SUBDIVISION OF PIMA COUNTY,ARIZONA,ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF OF RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA,IN BOOK 13 OF MAPS AND PLATS AT PAGE 18,THEREOF,DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK"B"; THENCE SOUTH 10 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 10 SECONDS WEST,ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID BLOCK"8"150 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 10 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 10 SECONDS WEST,ALONG THE WEST UNE OF BLOCK "8"A DISTANCE OF 155 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 29 SECONDS EAST,406.52 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID BLOCK'S"; THENCE NORTH 10 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 10 SECONDS EAST,ALONG THE EAST UNE OF BLOCK"B"A DISTANCE OF 155 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 29 SECONDS WEST,A DISTANCE Of 406.52 rCCT TO THE TRUE POINT Of BEGINNING. EXCEPT FROM THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY,THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF ARIZONA BY DEED RECORDED MARCH 13TH, 1979 IN DOCKET 5982 AT PAGE 577,MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH 155.00 FEET OF THE NORTH 305.00 FEET OF BLOCK"B",SUFFOLK HILLS ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF RECORD IN BOOK 13,OF MAPS AT PAGE 18,RECORDS OF PIMA COU'ITY, ARIZONA,AS MEASURED ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID BLOCK"8",WHICH LIES WITHIN THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED TRACT OF LAND: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 36,TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH,RANGE 13 EAST,GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN,PIMA COUNTY,ARIZONA; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 40 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF,A DISTANCE OF 1156.81 FEET TO THE EXISTING CENTERLINE OF U.S,HIGHWAY 89(TUCSON-ORACLE JCT.-GLOBE HIGHWAY); THENCE SOUTH 10 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 50 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID EXISTING CENTERLINE,A DISTANCE OF 1087.69 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 79 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 10 SECONDS EAST, 100.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING ON THE EXISTING EASTERLY R1GHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID U.S.HIGHWAY 89; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 79 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 10 SECONDS EAST,50.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 10 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 50 SECONDS WEST, 100.00 FEET; TT-L NCE NORTH 79 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 10 SECONDS WEST,50.00 FEET TO SAID EXISTING EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF U.S.HIGHWAY 89; THENCE NORTH 10 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 50 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EXISTING EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE,A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. ...�. ,...� a._.t�..,.��,,,, .....�... .....�...�> 3 Page 3 of 3 08/08/2015 12:40 PM A SB S oI 'S ItEcoim 14AP Itut.CIEE B DETAIL 2 225-51 SUFFOLK HILLS L ors i—44, 84 '',4." r FORMERLY L Ofl g 203-63 Bums A & B kr 63 4 4- 61 h X'4' 1 60 s. 59 a. sr 'A.- 57 u�• was till _�• axe 513 i ivEr-2-II:1 51A 4r i 55 ,.r 14 23SW 4 .Er SC t sla a- , ,.... -i,„„, 52A 53 11: 2.-ffer, i " a SIZE EEC 13 � MI. G ` r3� r Lr7 E ( ae�en 2II R 14 ir .,k.i,i 4� 4� 1. 7e asaao S1` FEET� 1 ,= i - "AoillmENT ' ' . . {3 J j , +' t • - ,• ; . A 1,, CI(:). r ;• `. . c'• THIS.ACIBIEbiEN' ,-made and entered�•into':thle ..�.: { • day.of 116bruary, •1947, by and.between MARMITE_ NYDR, • : ." ; ''•'::/:i •i • ' ' ' aountves'or.Iltiffol1c-and rk"�~e ; a id :•partyof.Wit,'•'' 1 • ;.. • -. , 0 •• ' a first.part,. and WlhA,N:''aARD N, a widow,'party of the 5004 ' . •• - •' ' and part', .` • 1• , • ' , NITNESSE'H; .That. • I. ,' • . ' , 1 . ' •WI Aa, the party at the first part is the owner • •• - . • ' viumai •, • at that•ohrbain treat of land in Hisne County, Arizona,, de- , .. • t• scribed"as fa],lo+ra', to wit: . The North Half of Section 136, Township i• +, 12 South, Range 1.3 East, O. lc S. R. IL . 1 . ', ' r V,, L • ' I , t • . • And, WHERAS, there ia'now hsituated upon said _ ' treat or land owned'by the party of the first part a water ' syntein, consisting of well, pump and appurtenances, provide, ..-r; I' C1:11) risig a aid treat of laud of the party of tho first pert with" ', water for irrigation purpoaes; and a•, ' • • WHEREAS, the party of the seoond part is the ' ' • owner of d ern at•of:land adjoining the'aforesaid traot ,of ' minim] . k the party of the first, part, desoribed as follows, to'wit; ,'I+ • The $uthwoat.4uarter of Sae' 38,'Town- , - , ship 14 South, Range 13 East, {3. & S. R. g, k • And, wren, there i o now,situated Spon said . ....., (0.) ' ' , ,i traot of land owned.by the party of Ithe ooaond•part a . . ' t s . • ,vatbr system ooJtefsting of wall,'pump and appurtenances •• 2 , I • 1 • prQYidiTg;acid tract of: land of the party of the a second ' •, . , • . , . , part,wilth,water for irrigation purpose's; and' • • - ' ''WHEREAS, said two water syetorad 'arc approximately e1y , . ' • 'three-hundred—foot-distant one from the other; and . • .— , '., • • WHEREAS,.in tbe,.ovent of. a bre akdoppn of Ion or .• ; . ' .•1 ' • 1, , > 1i••If 1•�.i. ,•1•,•lam- .< ♦ �,.. ' :1 i 1 • '`i ••r•'.i., • , . ?'. III t,.1•, .., ll.l,',.,N.\ , •, ' .1.r•r jee r..• 11:••,1. ..' ;'. . • .4 1 ' (- Vi a other: t.;eaid: inter.'Di steiaaai i~t.wvuid, bd'ti • �dvanta�sous to the party hereto..'�i h s.•ite r•system .heal brokeni dawn;to- •be able•t imp OpprI,17••to�u■s •i n'her-.herethbstore de sort bed' ' raalat.of •land'ir ter.froia:,t�ie�rrs, er�syeteat of._the other, I - ,' ' T • ' party. hereto 'tar* i rx at ogres • • • r S ion:pure , • NOW, .'I�� RJ RS; 'in'ofonnideration or* the proad,a;vs - ... , t •P , and agr1etepnts he'reinai'tsr i et•+rorth, it ill ,agrsed,'by and •between the parties .hereto-as. follows: • • a$td-•two 'water terna'•2 ref nbptore referred to - • shall.•bo aonneo to d,by a pipe approximately three-'hundred L • feet long with a abut-off valets . �si.tuated-�tpprtiOnately at .. the dividing line between'tie'a1o,raeaid. properties off the part i.e e:•hereto. - 'In the ev enj. of a breakdown of e,ithvr of -the aforesaid water systems, the .party hereto whoeo water•,aye- tent has broken dbrm ithaYl hive the right to use, ' witliout , charge, water ,frbnn the later system of the 'other party • hn reto for the• irrligatian of her treat of land ,ee heroin- before described; .provided,. however, .that, no such ups shall over be Lora period of more -than . _ daps at., any one time without ape eia]. a reemdnt .authorising use for a longer period. • . It in ...specially •uncioratood and agreed -by aid• , botweien'ythe parties., hereto• that thin agreement ovnetitutee nothing'more than a license from one -party'heretb'to, the • other. party baretp,,, zjevooable ingaediately at any time by:- - Dither party horetp i••end'- that neither• by ,virtue of this .agreement,'nor by •the, use.upon the=lend-of gone party•hereto ,of.water i rots the;•water .risteTM off`• tints',;.othwr• party hereto ' • reef in 'any raaaner.n �no at•.all 'shall'eitheri party•.hera or :'.' { . °C) 3 L:ti't 1a.-nti of eIther party hero to as heret.oho fore do34r1h+td _.... 00 Cal0.o:l to vrattir from tho .1t or system of the other party hereto after 'either party hrtreto has terminated this arruomant and given notice to that nffoet to tort other party norato. 0 AM It is further agreedthat the death oreWler party i'o rota,.of it;anli', shcrl.1 (two this nrroe'ont at once to hecoyee andho of no FurOier farce or effect whatsoever, ri."1 Tni wIT1IESS thr►FElrOF the pert tas lroreto have h rt:- t,ri1.e eat their hands, all on the dry end ,year f'ira t horn. 'nhafore nut`s titan, II 2/Atutu-tawa_Acti_L#04,..efitnava id:4)u. 1'- .11),..4:_pja... ),-\ Ck:s......r., C1:141 —V . r -. "7 • \ [•r'trn\ L7 r.J 4.3 4 • F'. OF Artr lntIA ) sa. r()1UNTY OP PIMA ) . This instrument was aokknow1Or1i ici be Fore 'mu this A(.4 t-i ay or , 1947, by Marguerite Hyde, 0i3nCe'gr3 or Sur,i'olk and Berk sill.re, 'a'w:idow..• • '; t,rift eoirma3 4: aion expires ,,p,; /t _ t f frV- _ " .. ..44,.. '. i .4•7 6:2;t1.4.4,40, . • • ..• tro;+pry Fublia, ira vaunty, Az' z(ini. Sr"ATf: OF Ali IZOttA sn . MITf'11 O=1' P rMA ThL8 'instrument arras na;know10 dr,od he Thro me t.hi.s day ar �... 6 , 1047 , by Vale ” . •iurd"ri, a. wi Iiow . •' V- bo 7,n rr�i.a a V.o rs ':Cp 1 re s f / � • . I'`, ... ►j+'fir`. : , _ . , ,'Vi I'.t C.:44r I No tort'" 11 C, iiri klouny, Al'1•LOnfr. I • I I . 'e.. 4 ye R o t t C — 1 r' i . N .+ nl x._ 4 } Z 1r__ 1 � ;! 1W 1 r Ii'\ U -y s p E— yi '; A 4 0 2. -'"**4).. tr.0,3 g }•. - ! s ..". - 4." 47 N .4 t t+M „� O •�• T , rxt�' • i. .. .fi el O a, ;,. I 45i., ,..; ..._ ai v o a a te_ ......... f^ '• ► ' • 4'4 a g • T r ' . SOUTHERN ARIZONA TESTING LABORATORY P.O. BOX 2508 TUCSON, AZ 85702-2508 Ph: (520) 623-3331 - Fax: (520) 623-3214 satl.tucson@gmail.com February 3,2015 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT PREPARED FOR TUCSON KOI &WATER GARDENS, LLC C/O SOUTHWEST ENGINEERING P.O. BOX 31136 TUCSON, AZ 85751 Project: Tucson Koi &Cactus 7 g LONorth Oracle Road Oro Valley, AZ 85704 Parcel 225-51-0011A &225-51-012A SATL Project#27759-15 Its �. `04,V 29C6'1*.: W. KEVIN WALKER • k 444 4'4>oNA 6.s Expires:06 30/2016 W.K. Walker, P.E. SOUTHERN ARIZONA TESTING LABORATORY P.O. BOX 2508 TUCSON, AZ 85702-2508 Ph: (520) 623-3331 - Fax: (520) 623-3214 satl.tucson@gmall.com February 3, 2015 TUCSON KOI &WATER GARDENS,LLC C/O SOUTHWEST ENGINEERING P.O. BOX 31136 TUCSON, AZ 85751 ATTN: GEORGE SAHYOUNI, PE Project: SATL Project#27759-15 SOIL REPORT- GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING EVALUATION TUCSON KOI &CACTUS MO NORTH ORACLE ROAD ORO VALLEY, AZ 85704 In accordance with our proposal dated December 30,2014 and approved January 9,2015,we have completed the geotechnical engineering evaluation for the proposed new retail building and -pedestrian bridge located at 7776 North Oracle Road in Oro Valley, Arizona (Parcel No. 225-51-011A & 25-51-012A). Our project study results are attached. This engineering report contains geotechnical design recommendations to aid in the design and construction of foundations and other geotechnical related phases of the proposed project. Our evaluation showed compressible sands with varied silt content. In our opinion,the sites surface and subsurface soil conditions can be made suitable for the proposed development provided the report's recommendations are followed. The specific site conditions and recommendations are presented in the report. We are available for consultation during the design and construction stages of this project. If you have any questions, please contact us. Respectfully submitted, Southern Arizona Testing Laboratory "reirl*IN c) 29061 • �► W. KEVIN �- WALKER 4 NAU Expires:06 30/2016 W.K. Walker,P.E. Professional Engineer, P.E. #29061, Arizona ' SATL Project#27759-15 7910 North Oracle Road Oro Valley, Arizona TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. • INTRODUCTION 1 • PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 1 • SITE DESCRIPTION 2 • SITE SAMPLING 2 • GEOTECHNICAL LABORATORY TESTING 3 EARTHWORK • GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS 3 • SITE GRADING 4 • PLACEMENT AND COMPACTION 4-5 • IMPORT SOIL SPECIFICATIONS 5 • AGGREGATE BASE COURSE SPECIFICATIONS 5 • CORROSIVITY 5 • SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS 5 • SLOPE CONSIDERATIONS 6 • DRAINAGE 6 ANALYSIS &RECOMMENDATIONS • CONVENTIONAL FLOOR SLAB DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS 6-7 • ENGINEERED SLAB AND FOUNDATION SYSTEMS 7-8 • LATERAL EARTH PRESSURES&ASSOCIATED DESIGN RECOMMENATIONS FOR RETAINING WALLS 8-9 • CLOSING REMARKS AND LIMITATIONS 10 SUPPORTING INFORMATION • TEST PIT LOGS 11-12 • SI`l'E LOCATION MAP (Figure-1) 13 • SITE PLAN by Southwest Engineering WITH TEST PIT LOCATIONS(Figure-2) 14 • CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN by The WLB Group (Figure-3) 15 • METHODS OF SOIL CLASSIFICATION 16-17 • FIELD AND LABORATORY TEST RESULTS SUMMARY 18 • GEOTECHNICAL LABORATORY&FIELD TEST RESULTS 19-24 SOUTHERN ARIZONA TESTING LABORATORY SOUTHERN ARIZONA TESTING LABORATORY P.O. BOX 2508 TUCSON, AZ 85702-2508 Ph: (520) 623-3331 - Fax: (520) 623-3214 satl.tuc sort @ gmail.com February 3,2015 TUCSON KOl &WATER GARDENS,LLC C/O SOUTHWEST ENGINEERING P.O. BOX 31136 TUCSON, AZ 85751 Project: SATL Project #27759-15 Tucson Koi &Cactus 781ONorth Oracle Road Oro Valley, AZ 85704 Source: Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Sampling Date: January 12, 2015 INTRODUCTION This report contains geotechnical design recommendations to aid in the design and construction of the foundation for the proposed new retail project,located at 7776 North Oracle Road in Oro Valley, Arizona (Parcel No. 225-51-011A &225-51-012A). The site is in Section 36,Township 12 South, Range 43 Fast, of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian,Pima County, Arizona. The scope of the work performed for this project included site reconnaissance,subsurface exploration, laboratory testing, engineering analysis and report preparation. The recommendations contained in this report are based upon the results of this work and experience with similar soil conditions. The report addresses the following information: • General site and subsurface conditions encountered during our evaluation. • Recommendations for allowable bearing pressures,lateral earth pressures and estimates of differential settlement, etc. • Recommendations for support of concrete floor slabs. • Earthwork recommendations, including site and building area preparation,fill placement and suitability of on-site native soils as engineered fill and backfill. • Slope considerations. • Perimeter drainage recommendations. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The project site is proposed for a new retail structure (nursery showroom) and pedestrian bridge. It is our understanding that the new retail building is being designed as one-story wood frame and stucco construction, incorporating conventional reinforced slabs and foundations. The foundation loads for the proposed structures are unknown but anticipated to be relatively light. Shallow site cuts and fills with possible import soil fills are anticipated to obtain the finish floor elevation. The finish floor elevation should comply with the Hydrologist recommendations for this project site. Page 1 SITE DESCRIPTION The project site consists of two undeveloped parcels located on the east side of Oracle Road Jetween Suffolk Drive and Magee Road at the proposed new address of 7776 North Oracle Road. The site is northwest of Tucson in Oro Valley, Arizona. Parcel 225-51-011A is approximately 1.37 acres and Parcel 225-51-012A is approximately 1.42 acres. The site slopes predominantly from the east to the west with approximately 10 feet of grade variance from the east property line to the west property line and approximately 2 feet of grade variance in the proposed southwest retail building location. The natural vegetation is thick and consists of mesquite,palo verde, greasewood, cholla, prickly pear, barrel cactus and other small cactus and shrubs. An existing wash bed and critical resource area is present near the center of the two parcels and runs east to west(see Figure-3, Page 15). SITE SAMPLING The field work and subsurface sampling for this project was performed January 12,2015 using a CAT 416 E backhoe with a 16 inch bucket. Two test pits were excavated for the Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation near the proposed building location by Diggum Excavating,inc. The approximate test pit locations are indicated on Figure 2. During the field exploration, the subsurface conditions were described,logged and sampled (pages 11-12). The Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) was used to classify soils (see pages 16& 17). —Test Pit 1 (TP-1) .i loose layer of nonplastic (SM) silty sand with gravel topsoil was present from the natural ground grade to an approximate depth of 2.5 feet. A medium dense to dense layer of low plasticity (SW-SM) well-graded sand with silt and gravel was present from an approximate depth of 2.5 feet to 4.0 feet. Dense to very dense, nonplastic (SP-SM)poorly graded sand with silt, strongly cemented caliche was present from an approximate depth of 4.0 feet to 8.0 feet. Dense to very dense (SW-SM)well-graded sand with silt and gravel with variable cementation was present from approximately 8.0 feet to 11.5 feet and the bottom of TP-1. Test Pit 2(TP-2) A loose layer of nonplastic (SM) silty sand with gravel topsoil was present from the natural ground grade to an approximate depth of 2.5 feet. Medium dense,nonplastic (SW) well-graded sand with gravel was present from an approximate depth of 2.5 feet to 9.0 feet. Medium dense to dense (SP-SM) poorly graded sand with silt and gravel was present from approximately 9.0 feet to 10.5 feet and the bottom of TP-2. Caving occurred in TP-2 from the surface to an approximate depth of 8,0 feet. Areas of calcium carbonate cementation were encountered in the Test Pit 1 location. Soil moisture contents were moist to dry at the time of sampling. No free water was encountered in the test pit excavations. The test pit logs show the details of the subsurface conditions encountered during the field evaluation. Page 2 GEOTECHNICAL LABORATORY TESTING Select samples collected during the site investigation were used to conduct geotechnical aboratory testing. Geotechnical laboratory testing performed on soil samples collected from Test Pit 1 primarily focused on determining the characteristics of the native (SM) silty sand topsoil layer present in TP-1 from the natural ground grade to an approximate depth of 2.5 feet. Gradation (Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes-ASTM D 2487), the plastic behavior determined from the "Atterberg Limits" (Standard Test Method for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit and Plasticity Index of Soils - ASTM D 4318) and the swell potential(One- Dimensional Swell or Settlement Potential of Cohesive Soils-ASTM D 4546)were determined for the (SM) silty sand sample obtained from TP-1 (0.0' - 2.5' depth). Gradation and Atterberg limits testing was also conducted on bag samples of each soil layer obtained from TP-1 and a selected soil sample obtained from TP-2. A standard Proctor test(Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Standard Effort- ASTM D 698)was conducted on the (SM) silty sand soil to determine compaction properties and the results used in conducted the swell test. A summary of the field and laboratory testing performed is presented at the end of this report. The results of the field and laboratory testing form the basis for estimating material strength and other engineering properties and the development of the foundation and earthwork recommendations. • Expansive Properties At increased moisture contents, the existing native (SM)silty sand topsoil (TP-1, 0.0'-2.5' depth)has a low remolded expansion potential. (0.1% Expansion measured on a sample compacted to approximately 95% of the ASTM D 698 maximum dry density at about 3% below optimum water content,confined under a 100psf surcharge and submerged). • Compressive Properties At increased moisture contents,the existing near surface native soils(0.0'-2.5` depth) are expected to have a moderate to high compressive potential under the proposed construction loads. Without appropriate design and site preparation,the proposed structures could experience significant differential settlement. Most settlement is expected to occur soon after construction,although additional foundation movement can occur if water from any source infiltrates the subsurface soils. Soaking of the underlying foundation soils adjacent to the proposed structures should be avoided to minimize the potential for any long-term settlement associated with moisture changes and moisture differences in and around the subgrade soils. The site grading and drainage recommendations presented in this report should be closely followed. EARTHWORK General Considerations: The following presents general recommendations for site preparation, excavation, subgrade preparation and placement of engineered fills. The recommendations presented for design and construction of earth supported elements including foundations and slabs are outlined in this section. The site must be suitably prepared and the subgrade soils compacted as part of the earthwork which will be required to prepare the subgrade for the slab construction. Recommendations for earthwork and compaction specifications are discussed later in this report. While current designs may not include plans for a P.T. slab,we have also provided geotechnical recommendations for these popular `oundation systems. It is important to understand that using a P.T. slab does not necessarily indicate anat no foundation preparations are required in order to resist adverse differential settlements. In fact, relatively significant site specific foundation earthwork preparations are usually required in advance of the P.T. slab to minimize potential for adverse foundation deformations over the life of the structure. Page 3 SITE GRADING To provide uniform bearing values and limit differential settlement we recommend that all oundations and slabs be supported on a minimum 2.0 feet of engineered fill. Observation and testing of all earthworks, supervised by a geotechnical engineer, is necessary to ensure compliance with the grading recommendations. The building site should be prepared by stripping and removing all existing debris and vegetation from the building area and at least 5 feet beyond. All exposed surfaces should be free of mounds and depressions that could prevent uniform compaction. The existing native soils should be over-excavated and recompacted as engineered fill to a minimum 95% density to a minimum depth of 2.0 feet below the existing site grade and/or the bottom of the lowest foundation elevation;whichever is greater. The over-excavation and recompaction should extend beneath the entire building pad and a minimum 5 feet laterally beyond the footing edge in each direction. For detached conventional foundations and stem wall foundations,the over- excavation and recompaction with engineered fill should extend a minimum of 2.0 feet beneath the bottom of the foundation and a minimum of 2.0 feet laterally beyond the footing edge in each direction. The exposed native subgrade soil after over-excavation should be moistened to near optimum moisture to a minimum depth of 12 inches and compacted and tested to a minimum 95% density (ASTM D 698) prior to placement of the engineered fill. The on-site native soils are acceptable for use as fill and backfill in the building areas, after screening or removing all rock larger than 6 inches in size. Import fill material should be approved, granular, select material meeting the specifications contained in this report. All native soils and imported soils should be sampled, tested and approved by --4he geotechnical engineer or his representative during the site grading and prior to placement as ,tructural fill. Engineered fill and backfill should be placed in uniform level loose lifts, not to exceed 10 inches, processed to near optimum moisture,compacted and tested to a minimum of 95% density (ASTM D 698). Modifications of the fill lift size are dependent upon the compaction equipment capabilities. Fill placed on slopes steeper than 5:1 (horizontal to vertical) should be stepped and benched in uniform level lifts to reduce the potential for slippage between the existing slopes and fills. All site grading, over-excavation,fill and backfill placement, etc.,should be observed,verified and tested by the geotechnical engineer or his representative during construction. This site, if properly prepared, will provide adequate soil bearing values for the proposed structures. PLACEMENT AND COMPACTION Testing should be performed to verify that the relative compactions are being obtained as recommended regardless of the compaction equipment used. The recommended relative compaction levels for engineered fill materials are as follows: Material Minimum Percent Compaction (ASTM D 698) Exposed native subgrade soils after over-excavation 95 On-site and Imported fill soils: Beneath foundations 95 Beneath slabs 95 Aggregate base (beneath slabs) 95 Miscellaneous backfill in non-structural areas 90 For any fills below floor slabs and footings that are greater than 5 feet in thickness,the compaction should be increased to a minimum 98%of the ASTM D 698 Standard Proctor Maximum Dry Density weight. Page 4 All temporary excavations must comply with applicable local, state and federal safety regulations, including the current OSHA Excavation and Trench Safety Standards. All natural drainage must be completely diverted from the building areas and follow the Hydrologist's recommendations for this project site. IMPORT SOIL SPECIFICATIONS (ASTM C 136) Sieve Size %Passing by dry weight 6" 100 4" 85-100 3/4" 70-100 No. 4 Sieve 50-100 No. 200 Sieve 30 (Max) Maximum Liquid Limit 28 Maximum Plasticity Index 6 Maximum Expansive Potential (%)* 1.5 Maximum Soluble Sulfates (%) 0.10 *measured on a sample compacted to approximately 95 percent of the ASTM D 698 maximum dry density at about 3% below optimum water content. The sample is confined under a 100psf surcharge and submerged. AGGREGATE BASE COURSE SPECIFICATIONS (ASTM C 136) Sieve Size %Passing by dry weight 1" 100 3" 90-100 I/4' 45-75 No. 200 2-10 Maximum Plasticity Index 5 CORROSIVITY To minimize any likelihood of the slab being attacked by the underlying soils, the prepared slab subgrade that the slab will be cast over, should be constructed of a suitable aggregate base course which has a content of less than 0.10 percent by weight of water soluble sulfates (SO4). The area around the slab/structure should also be well drained to further prevent any likelihood of the slab being subject to attack by any possible soluble salts. SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS The project site is in the southeast corner of the Sonoran Seismic Source Zone. This zone is characterized as being tectonically stable with relatively few historic seismic events. Based on a recent 2008 earthquake database and seismic hazard assessment completed by the U.S. Geological Survey,this site is also characterized by a horizontal acceleration of 4.29 percent of the earths' gravitational -T-cceleration, at bedrock with a 90 percent probability of non-exceedance in 50 years. Based on the information obtained from our exploration and knowledge of the regional and local geology,we recommend using the 2012 International Building code soil Site Class D. Page 5 SLOPE CONSIDERATIONS In general, all work should be performed in accordance with the required local and state code equirements. The following slope practices are generally acceptable: All structures should be set back from the edge of fill slopes a distance equal to one and one half of the slopes height with a minimum required set back of 5 feet. This requirement will help ensure stable foundations in slope areas where compaction is difficult to achieve. Slopes 3:1 (horizontal to vertical) or less should be revegetated. Slopes from 3:1 to 2:1 should be stabilized with riprap with a minimum diameter of 6 inches, over filter fabric. Slopes steeper than 2:1 will require mechanically stabilized earth or retaining walls. All fill slopes created with the clean granular native soils should be riprapped or retained as specified in this report,to prevent erosion. No cut or fill slopes should exceed 6 feet measured vertically from the toe of the slope to the top of the slope. Erosion control should be constructed and maintained to prevent erosion of slopes and cleared, brushed or graded areas. The top/bottom of the cut/fill slopes must be a minimum of 2 feet from any property line. Bank protection and erosion setbacks for the existing wash and Critical Resource Area should comply with the Hydrologist's recommendations for this project site. DRAINAGE Saturation of soils below foundations and slabs could result in movements. It is extremely nportant that subsoils do not become saturated. All surface water run-offs should be controlled to prevent erosion,ponding and infiltration into the foundation soils during construction and for the life of the structures. Surface grades should be sloped to provide positive drainage away from all structures. In areas where sidewalks or paving do not immediately adjoin the structure, grades should slope away from the structure with an outfall of at least 3 percent for at least 5 feet beyond the perimeter walls. Down spouts, roof drains and scuppers should be discharged into splash blocks or extend away from the building when the ground surface beneath these features is not protected by exterior slabs and paving. Backfill against footings, exterior walls and in utility trenches should be well compacted and free of all construction debris to reduce the possibility of moisture infiltration. Planters and other surface features that have the potential to retain water adjacent to the structure should be eliminated or constructed in a manner such that planters are adequately sealed internally and/or allow any potential accumulation of water to drain away from the structure at 3 percent minimum fall for at least 5 feet horizontally from the structure. CONVENTIONAL FLOOR SLAB DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS Conventional reinforced foundations and floor slabs should meet or exceed the most current International Residential Code Design Criteria. Only non to low expansive materials should be used as fill below floor slab areas. To reduce potential slab movements, the subgrade soils should be prepared as discussed in the Earthwork and -Cite Grading section of this report. Additional conventional floor slab design and construction recommendations: • Use of separations and/or isolation joints between slabs and adjacent foundations,columns or utility lines is recommended to accommodate some independent movement. • Consider placement of joints in slabs to control the location and extent of cracking. Page 6 • Interior trench backfill placed beneath slabs should be compacted per the recommendations of this report. • Square slabs are less likely to crack compared to slender slabs. • For the anticipated design loading, a minimum 4 inch layer of clean sand,well-graded gravel or Aggregate Base Course should be placed beneath interior slabs. For heavy loading,vehicular traffic or concentrated loads on floor slabs, a minimum 6 inch thick layer of Aggregate Base Course is recommended. • Potential vapor rise through the slab can be mitigated by using moisture barriers and are especially relevant where moisture sensitive floorings are planned on interior slabs. • Other design and construction techniques,as outlined in the ACI Design Manual,Section 302.1R are recommended. • Follow the design and construction recommendations of the American Concrete Institute (ACI) Design Manual,Section 302.1R. Improper curing procedures and/or high slump (water to cement ratio)conditions could cause excessive shrinkage,cracking or curling. ENGINEERED SLAB AND FOUNDATION SYSTEMS Thickened Post-Tensioned Slab/Footing Design Recommendations: The technical inputs for planning a thickened post-tensioned (P.T.) slab are largely controlled by the structural engineering design requirements and the value of the"modulus of subgrade reaction" for the subgrade soils. Other important considerations include: the allowable bearing capacity, estimates of likely foundation settlements and the potential and degree of possible collapse and/or expansion of native soils below the slab. The planned slab and foundation design details for the subject property are currently understood to possibly include a P.T. slab system. Any P.T. slab for the planned structures must be designed by a Structural Engineer based on the geotechnical recommendations provided in this eport. This report can also be used for appropriate planning relative to conventional monolithic concrete slabs on-grade or other foundation types as allowed under prescriptive building codes. Guidelines presented in the Post-Tensioned Institutes, Third Edition, 2004 and Addendum of May 2007, or other approved methods should be followed. The post-tensioned slab and foundation system should be designed by a Structural Engineer for a compressive soil condition. The stressing and phasing of construction for the P.T. slab should follow the Structural Engineer's recommendations. Proper slab curing for P.T. or conventional foundations is recommended. We are providing the following parameters for this design: - Soil values and parameters are applicable for Engineered Slab and Foundation systems and/or Conventional Slab and Foundation Design. - To provide uniform bearing values and limit differential settlement we recommend that all slabs and foundations be supported on a minimum 2.0 feet of engineered fill. - The existing native soils in the building areas should be over-excavated a minimum 2.0 feet below the natural ground grade or 2.0 feet below the bottom of the lowest foundation elevation;whichever is greater(prior to construction of engineered fill). - The exposed native subgrade soil after over-excavation should be moistened to near optimum moisture to a minimum depth of 12 inches and compacted and tested to a minimum 95% density (ASTM D 698)prior to placement of the engineered fill. - Engineered fill should be constructed in a manner resulting in uniform moisture contents and densities after compaction that meet or exceed the Soil Report site grading recommendations. - A minimum of 4 inches of spec. Aggregate Base Course is recommended under all interior concrete slabs.A minimum of 6 inches of spec.Aggregate Base Course is recommended under concrete slabs with heavy loading,vehicular traffic or concentrated loads. Page 7 Maximum Allowable Bearing Pressure o Engineered fill as recommended 800psf at a minimum 6 inches below the lowest adjacent grade. 1500psf at a minimum 12 inches below the lowest adjacent grade. 1900psf at a minimum 18 inches below the lowest adjacent grade. - Edge Moisture Variation Distance, em Engineered fill as recommended. o Center lift condition 5.5 Feet o Edge lift condition 2.4 Feet - Estimated Maximum Settlement and Estimated Differential Movement Ym: o Engineered fill as recommended 0.5 inches - Slab Subgrade Friction Coefficient on: o Polyethylene sheeting 0.75 o Cohesionless soils 1.00 o Cohesive soils 2.00 - Modulus of Subgrade Reaction(estimated value for 1x1 ft. sq. plate): o Engineered fill as recommended 250pci All building pad grading must be observed,verified and tested by the geotechnical engineer or his representative during grading. LATERAL EARTH PRESSURES AND ASSOCIATED DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS FOR RETAINING WALLS The following geotechnical design recommendations are included in the case where development plans include any retaining walls. These general recommendations generally apply to retaining structures less than six feet in height. Walls should be designed by a structural engineer to resist lateral earth pressures exerted by the retained backfill (lightly compacted by light hand-held equipment within four feet of the wall, as discussed below) plus any additional lateral force that will be applied to the wall due to surface loads placed at or near the wall. The recommended equivalent fluid weights presented below are for static conditions with dry (above any free water surface) granular backfill materials placed level behind walls. The recommended equivalent fluid pressures for unrestrained foundation elements are: ACTIVE SLIDING PRESSURE • Existing native (SM) silty sand soil 31psf/ft E.F.P.* • Compacted granular backfill 30psf.ft E.F.P.* PASSIVE RESISTANCE PRESSURE • Existing native (SM) silty sand soil 280psf/ft E.F.P.* • Compacted granular backfill 450psf/ft E.F.P.* COEFFICIENT OF BASE FRICTION • Existing native (SM) silty sand soil .28** ■ Compacted granular engineered fill .40** *E.F.P. =Equivalent Fluid Pressure ''The coefficient of base friction should be reduced to 0.30 when used in conjunction with passive pressure. Page 8 Where the design includes restraining elements, the following equivalent fluid pressures are recommended: At Rest • Existing native (SM) silty sand soil 55psf/ft • Compacted granular backfill 50psf/ft The active pressure is typically used to design unrestrained walls, where rotation about the base is possible to mobilize an active state of stress. At-rest pressure is typically used to design rigid or non- yielding walls, such as for any basement walls. The resultant force of the static lateral force prism should be applied at a distance of 33 percent of the wall height above the soil elevation on the heel side of the wall. The tabulated values are generally based on a soil unit weight of 120 pounds per cubic foot(pcf), and do not provide for a factor of safety, sloping backfills, surcharge conditions resulting from foundations,vehicle traffic, or heavy compaction equipment. The drained values do not provide for hydrostatic forces (for example, submerged conditions due to standing water in the backfill materials). Surcharge loads induce additional pressures on earth retaining structures. An additional lateral load on non-yielding walls equal to 0.5 times the applied surcharge pressure should be included in the design for uniform area surcharge pressures. Lateral pressures for other surcharge loading conditions should be considered, if required. The setback distance from the home to the retaining wall must be considered with your structural engineer. Any backfill within approximately 4 feet,measured horizontally,behind retaining walls should be compacted with relatively lightweight,hand-operated compaction equipment to reduce the potential )r creation of relatively large compaction-induced stresses. If large or heavy compaction equipment is used, compaction-induced stresses could result in increased lateral earth pressures on the retaining walls in addition to those presented in this report. Backfill material should be brought up in lifts uniformly behind retaining walls (in other words,the backfill should be at about the same elevation behind the retaining wall as any general backfill away from the wall is placed and compacted). We recommended the use of granular,relatively free-draining soil for retaining wall backfill to reduce the potential for hydrostatic pressure build up. Other recommendations for geotechnical parameters associated with any walls include: an allowable bearing capacity in engineered fill as recommended of 1500psf for a footing bottom at 12 inches below the lowest adjacent grade,minimum backfill friction angle equal to 28 degrees, cohesionless,modulus of subgrade reaction greater than 250pci (estimated value for 1x1ft. square plate) and likely total settlements estimated at less than 1 inch with likely differential settlement estimated at two-thirds of the total settlement provided the recommendations in this report are followed. Retaining walls should be designed with a back drain that drains to lower ground or to a sump with a float-activated pump. Medium to high plasticity clay type soils should not be used as backfill against retaining or restraining walls. The exterior face of the below-grade walls,which are exposed to interior living spaces,should be water-proofed to retard moisture penetration. All backfill should be placed and compacted in uniform level lifts as recommended in this report. Cobbles,if present, should be removed from the soils placed adjacent to walls. Care should be taken to .void damaging the walls during placement of backfill. Backfill under structures should be inspected and tested during placement and compaction to ensure the compaction specifications of this report are met(see the Site Grading section of this report). Other recommendations for geotechnical parameters Page 9 associated with any walls include the parameters provided under foundation recommendations and a backfill friction angle equal to or greater than 28-degrees (estimated at 33-degrees). LOSING REMARKS AND LIMITATIONS This report has been prepared in substantial accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practice, as it existed in the site area at the time services were rendered. No other warranty,either expressed or implied, is made. Conclusions and recommendations contained in this report were based on or in part on the data obtained from the test pits and conditions encountered during the field investigation and are applicable only to those project features described herein. it is possible subsurface conditions could vary between or beyond the points explored. The nature and extent of variations between these observation points may not become evident until the time of construction. If conditions are encountered during construction that differ from those described in this report, or if the scope or nature of the proposed construction changes,it will become necessary to re-evaluate the recommendations of this report and a qualified geotechnical engineer should be notified in order to review and, if deemed necessary,conduct additional studies and/or provide supplemental recommendations. This report does not purport to address all the effects of local geologic conditions,including seismic activity, subsidence and fissuring, or any other ground movement not related to settlement or expansion of soils. The scope of services provided for this project did not include the investigation and/or evaluation of toxic substances, soil or groundwater contamination of any type,any environmental or biological (e.g., mold,fungi, and bacteria) assessment of the site. If such conditions are encountered uring site development, additional studies may be required. Also, services provided for this project did not include the evaluation of the presence of critical environmental habitats or culturally sensitive areas. This report may be used only by the intended client and their agents and only for the purposes stated herein, within a reasonable time from its issuance. Land use, site conditions, and other factors may change over time that may require additional studies. In the event a significant period of time elapses between the issuance date of this report and construction, a qualified geotechnical engineer shall be notified of such occurrence in order to review current conditions. Depending on that review, additional studies may be required. All applicable Arizona State laws and regulations regarding protection and discovery of archeological remains and artifacts should be complied with in the event that such remains or artifacts are unearthed during construction. It is recommended that the geotechnical engineer be provided the opportunity for a general review of final design and specifications in order that earthwork and foundation recommendations may be properly interpreted and implemented. Further,the geotechnical engineer should be afforded the opportunity to conduct site reviews during construction. If the soil and foundation engineer is not accorded the privilege of making these recommended reviews,he can assume no responsibility for misinterpretation of his recommendations. This report is issued with the understanding that the owner or their representative will ensure that the applicable provisions of this report are called to the attention of the designers and incorporated into the plans; and further, that the necessary steps will be taken to ensure that these provisions will be --carried out by the construction contractor and subcontractors. Should you have any questions, please contact us. Page 10 SOUTHERN ARIZONA TESTING LABORATORY Test Pit Number TP-1 SATL Project Number: 27759-15 Client: Tucson Koi &Water Gardens, LLC c f o Southwest Engineering Location of Test Pit: See Figure 2 Project: Tucson Koi & Cactus -'1810 North Oracle Road - Oro Valley, AZ Sampled by: M.L. Vick Sampling Date:January 12,2015 Depth USCS Description of Moisture (feet) Code Subsurface Conditions (Density (%) 0 1.[Y-1.5' 6.4 depth 1-- 0.0`-2.5'depth,loose,dark brown(7.5YR 3/4),moist,SILTY SAND WITH SM GRAVEL,nonplastic fines,homogeneous,not cemented,(no effervescence 108.90 5.3 to 10% dilute HCO),some roots. 3 2.5'-4.0' depth,medium dense to dense,brown(7.5YR 4/4),damp,WELL- SW-SM GRADED SAND WITH SILT AND GRAVEL,low plasticity fines, homogeneous,not cemented,(weak effervescence to 10% dilute HCI),some 2.3 subrounded Catalina gneiss cobbles up to 8" in size,trace roots. 5 4.0'-8.0' depth,dense to very dense,strong brown(7.5YR 5/6),damp, 3.4 6 SP-SM POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT,nonplastic fines,homogeneous, strongly cemented caliche,(violent effervescence to 10% dilute HCl),some subrounded Catalina gneiss cobles up to 6" in size. 7 8T 9 8.0'-11.5'depth,dense to very dense,strong brown(7.5YR 5.6),damp, SW-SM WELL-GRADED SAND WITH SILT AND GRAVEL,nonplastic fines, 3.9 10.__ homogeneous,variably cemented,(strong effervescence to 10% dilute HC1), some subrounded Catalina gneiss cobbles up to 8"in size. { 11 { Bottom of test pit at 11.5 feet. No free water encountered. Excavating Equipment: CAT 416 E Backhoe Page 11 SOUTHERN ARIZONA TESTING LABORATORY Test Pit Number TP-2 SATL Project Number: 27759-15 Client: Tucson Koi &Water Gardens, LLC c/o Southwest Engineering Location of Test Pit: See Figure 2 Project: Tucson Koi&Cactus -710 North Oracle Road -Oro Valley, AZ Sampled by: M.L. Vick Sampling Date:January 12, 2015 Depth USCS Description of Dry DensityMoisture P (feet) Code Subsurface Conditions (PCF) (%) 0._ 1-- 0.0'-2.5' depth,loose,dark brown(7.5YR 3/4),moist,SILTY SAND WITH SM GRAVEL,nonplastic fines,homogeneous,not cemented,(no effervescence to 10% dilute HCO),some roots,some caving. 2 3 2.5'-9.0'depth,medium dense,brown(7.5YR 4/4),damp to dry,WELL- 5^ GRADED SAND WITH GRAVEL,nonplastic fines,homogeneous,not SW cemented,(no effervescence to 10% dilute HCI),trace roots,some 2.0 subrounded Catalina gneiss cobbles up to 8"-10"in size. 6 7 8._._ • 9.0'-10.5' depth,medium dense to dense,brown(7.5YR 4/4),damp to dry, SP-SM POORLY GRADED SAND WTTH SILT AND GRAVEL,nonplastic fines, homogeneous,not cemented,(no effervescence to 10% dilute HCI),some 10 subrounded Catalina gneiss cobles and boulders. 11_ Bottom of test pit at 11.5 feet. No free water encountered. excavating Equipment: CAT 416 E Backhoe Page 12 t _ Milt it , , r 4—— _L---7-7-7F5114 21Q0 u U- S 1 oesa 2tsa I nazo 1 r11 f oleo A C __ lY ii Isins _, OStA r `,� II a , _ ' --- a _ 0120 O99D _ ___ ._ _ F � L 952A 9900 z O. 7L 0?2A N ..0-. NARUNOELDR_ - illilM t .G .- IIII /In/ aa50 oaf y Aa0 u j alp �sb�r % 3 9L r ___ _ ____________ N SITE LOCATION MAP FIGURE-1 NO SCALE CLIENT: Tucson Koi &Water Gardens,LLC SOUTHERN ARIZONA c/o Southwest Engineering TESTING LABORATORY P.O.BOX 2508 TUCSON,AZ 85702 PROJECT (520)623-3331 LOCATION: Tucson Koi&Cactus satl.tucson@gmail.com 'iO North Oracle Road ___ Oro Valley,AZ 85704 Parcel 225-51-011A&225-51-012A SAIL Project Number:27759-15 Page 13 r } i i 1[ I i • r i • .f t t _ - T . ... . v i { TP-2 . ( I-4 EL::: Pillii E- I - , TP-1 .a.v--,___Ipirrri r____, . Esi 1 1 f,":,-....r i .: i 1 __ ___.__ .� _.. i_I 1. _L l__ —1 LL_----� .. 1_— ...� a . . .. _zY . .__.. IN SITE PLAN by Southwest Engineering WITH TEST PIT LOCATIONS FIGURE-2 NO SCALE CLIENT: Tucson Koi&Water Gardens, LLC SOUTHERN ARIZONA c/o Southwest Engineering TESTING LABORATORY ` P.O.BOX 2508 TUCSON,AZ 85702 PROJECT (520)623-3331 LOCATION: Tucson Koi&Cactus satitucson@gmail.com 7810 North Oracle Road Oro Valley,AZ 85704 Parcel 225-51-011A&225-51-012A SATL Project Number:27759--15 .Wage 14 • i LI I # s 0 ; • l ;y .:':r ":1.{l:.i•:{?{.,h:r �;.{. . ....:::i,',...::::,:::,.•,.::::i:C.:!!!,:7:i!!i„,,,7,'!.::%i F!. : :•:;Ai ::: ff•.iyyti .i f r- r r _ Vt,• �II r¢1� l }:: i : ryIY' Ir {.I l: }:i: :rr?d , .. :4yl .rr:? �I.}R �'r rf I y};{1; :{; ' r • ? I.. .• l r i . ; .'""''': r ;r.-.r.•r•:•:',f. :Y •: .,, 7ii }:'.•:�::". • , :;� . ,:r''' :1::: ??• :-• :v.:,;:*�:tif:}h. im ::i'Yi 'I i, ,,:!i: ' • . . .; '';;_ ii am .r t r �iLII TUCSON K *&WAi-ER Q.ARD N. CONCEPTUAL SCAP'E PLAN FOR CONOIT ONAL..USE PERMIT l IN CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN By The WLB Group FIGURE-3 NO SCALE CLIENT: Tucson Koi &Water Gardens, LLC SOUTHERN ARIZONA c/o Southwest/ Engineering TESTING LABORATORY P.O.BOX 2508 TUCSON,AZ 85702 PROJECT (520)623-3331 LOCATION: Tucson Koi&Cactus satl.tucson@gmail.com 7510 North Oracle Road Oro Valley,AZ 85704 Parcel 225-51-011A&225-51-012A SATL Project Number:27759-15 _`age 15 Geotechnical Field Investigation Methods &Procedures for Logging Soils Sampling Symbols: Drilling Symbols: ss Split Spoon Sampler-1-3/8"I.D.Unless otherwise indicated nio Hand Dug using Shovel&/or Pick sr Thin Walled(Shelby)Tube-2"OD,Unless otherwise indicated ns Hollow Stem Auger its Ring Sampler-242"ID.Unless otherwise indicated Ha Hand Auger is Bulk or Bag Sample or Loose Auger Sample roc Diamond Rock Core Drilling Ds Diamond Bit Core Sample-Core O.D.indicated(Typ.178 to 2.5") we Wash Boring,Mud Rotary,Tricorn!Rack Bit The standard penetration test measures the"Nvalue"or the number of blows required to advance a standard 2-inch O.D.split-spoon sampler(SS)the last 12 inches of penetration with a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches.(See'Consstency"below.) SOIL DESCRIPTIONS Soils are described and classifiedbased on the Unified Soil Classification System(USCS)Coarse-grained sails have more than 50%of their dry weight retained on a#21L)sieve(0.075nsm opening size)referring to materials which are prt3damfnatelysand,gravel,cobbles,or boulders.Fine-grained soils have less than 50%of their dry weight retained on the ilk sieve and include days which show plasticity and silts which are typically non plastic.Major constituents maybe added as modifiers and minor constituents maybe added according to the relative abundance.Coarse-grained soils are described based on their in-place relative density and fine-grained soils on the basis of their consistency as detailed below.In the absence of laboratory test data,a visual-manual description canbe obtained by estimates made in the field. ORDER&DEFINITION OF TERMS 1)CONSISTENCY(For California 14odified Senpler-MS[or Dames&More Sampler](OD=3"lE(w/Riztgs)2.4 SPT-N(blows/ftp0.b3 CMS-N(blows/ft) COARSE-GRAINED SOILS FINE-GRAINED SOILS vele ram SPT-N<4 eery rate Posse SPT-N e2 Easy to Squeeze Ulm SPT-N 4to10 Can be deg by spade stilt FPo/seoo5se' SPT-N 2to4 Molded by Light FingerPressure wed nerve SPE-N 10 to30 slam Paos to 1 D tat 5FF-N 4 toe Molded by Strong Finger Pressure reran SFT-N SO tO50 Needspick for excavation seat Pal a to xD is SPF-N 8 to15 Indented by Thumb Very Dense SPT-N>50 very stiff PP2D to aD st 5FF-N 15 to30 Indented by Thumb Nail PP=Pocket Penetrometer ran 'PP rcote SFT-N>30 —Also describe using Rock Nomenclature 1.0 tsf=150 KN/m^2 2)COLOR Preferably use a Munsel Color Chart for Soils 3)MOISTURE CONDITION aRY No signs of any moisture,dusty DAMP Some sings of moisture but not nece sarilymddeble PSOIST Obvious presence of interstitial water WET Significant presence of water but not saturated s ATER servo Extreme wetness,voids filled with water 4y SOIL NAME OF MAJOR COMPONENT 5)SOIL NAME OF SECONDARY COMPONENTS i&eatca pits(tasers,aa.SANDor CRAWL Ake. TRACE 1 to5% Boulders Over12 in.(300nun) LITTLE 5 to12%(Requires Dual MOS Sycanhil) Cobbles 3 to 12 in.(75 to 300mm) sows 12 to 30% Gravel #4 Sieve to 3 in.(4.75 to 75mm) AND 30 to 50%(ORSilty Oravelly,etr.Modifier) Sand CEO to#4 Sieve(005 to 4.75mm) 6)PARTICLE SHAPE 7)PLASTICITY OF FINES[Considestrg Plasticity Index(PI.)] ANGULAR IS AT NON' P.I.=0,Cannot roll 1/8 in.dianl.thread SUB ROUNDED FLOM ATM WWIL/FATaCrTY P.I.=1 to 10 ROUNDED IRREDISLAR ram.PLASTIC P.I.=11 to 30 RICHLY PLASTIC PI.>30 STRUCTURE OF SOIL a parsert) 9)CEMENTATION Of remit) FISSURED PURR,:Sat sprang lleterumb[ypantsties Csetftim welt rofD iota Hrltocts cpitt)ecstfAvaixhta STRATIFIED Iaccassoneay saes n p Golf weak'csdie'scats) ICaeeattataon w f aVatvasa Coto WE woad typicAtsoggest a'caticha'sorry LArsaATED ROPSOGRIOIO S swOoaenoua misname OPTIONAL TERMS AND CODES TO DESCRIBE WEATHERING/ALTERATION/MINERALOGY A)WEATHERING of Soil Mass CS Concretionary Soil((aliAs,Laterite) RS Residual Soil;No rock texture,Original minerals decomposed to secondary minerals,no rock fabric,easily excavated by hand,roots maybe present Cw Completely Weathered;Completely decomposed rockbut rock texture still recognizable,can be excavated by hand,crumbles in hand HW HighlyWeathered;Pieces canbe broken&crumbled in hand MW Moderately.Weathered;has some intact rock strength,Pieces can not be broken by hand SW SiightlyWeathered;Slight discoloration throughout but not significantly weaker than fresh rock UW Fresh/Unweathered;No intact strength loss,may show soma discoloration,weathering along joints $)AL TERAT ION of Rack or Rock Pieces(sand,;mare],cobbles)in Soil Mass HA Highly Altered;More than half of rock is decomposed,can be broken and crumbled by hand,takes on soil properties,little parent rock appearance MA Moderately Altered;Can be broken by hand,parent hock fabric noticeable but more than half of rock is decomposed S A Slightly Altered:Discolored but maintains intact rock strength pope rtes. UA Fresh Unaltered Rock,;No discoloration C)1M INEERAIDGY of Rack Pieces(sand,pave',cabbies) Ca Calcite Fe Iron or Iron Oxide No None Ch Chlorite GY Gyps Pi Pyrite Cl Clay Alteration That Manganese Oxide Qs Quartz SOUTHERN ARIZONA TESTING LABORATORY Page 16 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (From A.S.T.M.D-2487) Criteria for Assigning Soil Group Symbols and Group Names Using Geotechnical Laboratory Test Res ul4i) Soil Classification Group Group Named Symbol Coarse-Grained Soils Gravels Clean Gravels Cu>'4and 1<aCc<(e) GW Well-graded gravel(f) More than 50%of coarse Less than 5%Fines(c) Cu<=4 and/or 1>Cc>3(e) GP Poorly graded gravel(f) More than 50%retained fraction retained on Gravels with Fines Fines classify as ML or MH GM Silty gravel(f,g,h) No.4 sieve More than 12%Fines(c) Fines classify as CL or CH GC Clayey gravel(f,g,h) on No.230 sieve Sands Clean Sands Cu>==6 and 1<y_c<-. (e) SW Well-graded sand(f) 50%or more of coarse Less than 5%fines(d) Cu<6 and/or 1}Cc>3(e) SP Poorly graded sand(f) fraction passes Sands with Fines Fines clsssifyas ML or MH SM Silty sand(g,h,i) No.4 sieve More than 12%Fines(d) Fmes classify as CL or CH S C Clayey sand(g,h.i) Fine-Grained Soils Silts and Clays Inorganic PI>7 and plots on or above"A"line(l) CL Lean Clay(k,l,m) Liquid limit less than 53 PI<4 or plotsbelow"A"line(0 ML Silt(k),m) 50%or more passes the Organic Liquid limit-oven dried OL Organic day(k,l,ni,n) Liquid lint-not dried Organic silt(klntp) No.200 sieve Silts and Clays Inorganic PI plasma or above"A"line CH Fat clay(kl,m) Liquid lint 53 or more PI plotsbelow"A"line MH Elastic silt(k.l,m) Organic Liquid limit-oven dried OH Organic day(k,],raP) Liquid limit-not dried Organic stilt(k„l,m,q) Highly Organic Soils Primarilyorgenic matter,dark in color,and organic odor PT Peat NCYTES (a)Based on the material passing the 3-in.(75-mm)sieve (h)If Fines are organic,add"with organic fines"to group name (b)If filed sample contained cobbles or boulders,or both,add'with cobbles (i)If soil contains)15%gravel,add"with gravel"to group name or boulders,or both"to the group name. (0If Attuberg limits plot in shaded area,soil is a CL-ML,silty clay (c)Gravels with 5 to12%Fines required dual symbols:GPI-GM well graded (k)If soil contains 15 to 24%plus No.203,add"with sand"or"with gravel with silt,OW-GC well-graded gravel with clay,GP-GM poorly gravel,"whichever is predominant graded gravel with silt,GP-GC poorly graded gravel with day (i)If soil contains)30%plus No.2CO,predominantly sand add (d)Sands with 5 to12%Fines required dual symbols SW-SM well graded "sandy"to group name sand with silt,SW-SC well-graded sand with clay,SP-SM poorly (m)If soil contains>-=50%plus No.200,predominantly gravel,add Igraded sand with silt,SP.�poorly graded sand with day "gravelly"to group name (e)Cu=Dmif Dio Cc= t /(Dia x Dui) (n)PI>+4 and plots on or above"A"line (elf soil contains>=15%sand,add"with sand"to group name (o)PI<4 or plots below"A"line (g)If Fines classify as CL-ML,use dual symbol GC-GM,or SC-SM (p)PI plots on or above"A"line (q)PI plots below"A"line Criteria fo rClass ification of Fine-Grained Soils and Fine-Grained Fraction of Coarse-Grained Soils 60 50 'U"IINE PI".9"(L$) • 40 uuu LINE CH or OH "A"LINE 41 '2 30 , LINE r- E"t 20 i CL or OL MH or OH _____�.. ,� 10 __ __. _._-_ �.___.�____�_-..._. ____. _.._.._.__....____._ __.— .__ . C 4 L-ML ML or OL 0 - 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 LIQUID LIIMIIT (LL) SOUTHERN ARIZON A TESTING LABOR ATORY Page 17 SOUTHERN ARIZONA TESTING LABORATORY P.O. BOX 2508 TUCSON, AZ 85702-2508 Ph: (520) 623-3331 — Fax: (520) 623-3214 satl.tucson@gmail.com February 3,2015 TUCSON KOI&WATER GARDENS,LLC C/O SOUTHWEST ENGINEERING P.O. BOC 31136 TUCSON,AZ 85751 Project: SATL Project #27759-15 Tucson Koi&Cactus MO North Oracle Road Oro Valley, Arizona 85704 Parcel 225-51-001 A &225-51-012A Field and Laboratory Test Results Summary EXPANSION IN-SITU PROPERTIES TEST DRY MOISTURE % PLASTICITY COMPACT PIT DEPTH DENSITY CONTENT PASSING SOIL MOIST. DRY NO. (FT) (PCF) (%) LL PI #200 CLASS DENSITY CONT. SURCHARGE EXPANSION SIEVE (USCS) (PCF) (%) (KSF) (%) TP-1 0.0-2.5 108.90 5.3-6.4 NP 14.4 SM 118.85 7.0 0.1 0.1 TP-1 2.5-4.0 2.3 21 2 7.2 SW-SM TP-1 4.0-8.0 3.4 NP 10.2 SP-SM TP-1 8.0-11.5 3.9 NP 7.1 SW-SM TP-2 2.5-9.0 2.0 NP 3.6 SW NOTE:Percent expansion measured on a soil sample compacted to approximately 95% of the ASTM D 698 maximum dry density at about 3% below optimum water content,confined under a 100psf surcharge and submerged. Page 18 SOUTHERN ARIZONA TESTING LABORATORY P.O. BOX 2508 TUCSON, AZ 85702-2508 Ph: (520) 623-3331 - Fax: (520) 623-3214 satl.tucson@gmail.com February 3, 2015 TUCSON KOI&WATER GARDENS, LLC C/O SOUTHWEST ENGINEERING P.O. BOX 31136 Project: SATL Project#27759-15 TUCSON, AZ 85751 Tucson Koi &Cactus 78)0 North Oracle Road Oro Valley, AZ 85704 Parcel 225-51-011A &225-51-012A REPORT OF LABORATORY AND FIELD DENSITY TESTS Proctor No.1 Native Soil (ASTM D 698 Method'A') Source:TP-1 0.0'-2.5'Below the Natural Ground Grade Maximum Dry Density,pcf 125.1 Optimum Moisture, % 10.0 ASTM Test Method D 1556 Field Density No. 1 TP-1 -Existing Undisturbed Native Soil 1.0'-1.5'Below the Natural Ground Grade Percent Moisture 5.30 Proctor No.1 Dry Density 108.90 Percent Compaction 87.1 Page 19 SOUTHERN ARIZONA TESTING LABORATORY P.O. BOX 2508 TUCSON, AZ 85702-2508 Ph: (520) 623-3331 - Fax: (520) 623-3214 satl.tucson@gmail.com February 3, 2015 For: TUCSON KOI&WATER GARDENS,LLC C/O SOUTHWEST ENGINEERING P.O. BOX 31136 TUCSON, AZ 85751 Received:1/12/2015-AM Lab No.27759 Submitted by:SATL/M.L.Vick Marked:Native Soil-Sample#1 REPORT OF LABORATORY TESTS Project:Tucson Koi&Cactus-7810 North Oracle Road Oro Valley,AZ 85704 Source:TP-1 0.0'-2.5'Below the Natural Ground Grade Mechanical Analysis-ASTM D 2487 Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes ASTM Test Methods C136,D1140,02216&D4318 Sieve %Retained %Passing Size (Indiv.) (Cumul.) 5" Liquid Limit % 4" Plastic Limit % 3" 0.0 100.0 Plasticity Index Nonplastic 2" 6.2 93.8 Unified Soil Classification System:(SM)silty sand with gravel 11/2" 0.0 93.8 1" 2.5 91.3 3/4" 0.8 90.5 Bitumen Content 1/2" 2.2 88.3 Specific Gravity 3/8" 1.6 86.7 Moisture 6.40 % 1/4" 5.5 81.2 Absorption #4 4.0 77.2 Weight/Cu.Ft.Rodded lbs.,Loose #8 7.8 69.4 Fineness Modulus 10 4.5 64.9 Organic Impurities 16 13.6 51.3 30 13.1 38.2 Abrasion(L.A.) % wear 100 rev. 40 6.0 32.2 % wear 500 rev. 50 4.9 27.3 Soundness(Sodium Sulfate)5 cycles 100 7.6 19.7 (Magnesium Sulfate)5 cycles 200 5.3 14.4 Potential Reactivity -200 14.4 %Expansion=0.1% ]measured on a sample compacted to approx.95%of the Expansive Pressure=500psf]ASTM D 698 maximum dry density at about 3%below optimum water content. The sample is confined under a 100psf surcharge and submerged. Proctor No.1 (ASTM D 698)Meth"A" Native Soil Source:Test Pit#1 0.0'-2.5'Below the Natural Ground Grade Maximum Dry Density,pcf 125.1 Optimum Moisture,%© 10.0 Respectfully submitted, Southern Arizona Testing Laboratory 441,00.4. Page 20 M.L.Vick-Manager SOUTHERN ARIZONA TESTING LABORATORY P.O. BOX 2508 TUCSON, AZ 85702-2508 Ph: (520) 623-3331 - Fax: (520) 623-3214 satl.tucson@gmail.com February 3,2015 For: TUCSON KOI&WATER GARDENS,LLC C/O SOUTHWEST ENGINEERING P.O. BOX 31136 TUCSON,AZ 85751 Received:1/12/2015-AM Lab No.27760 Submitted by:SATL/M.L.Vick Marked:Native Soil-Sample#2 REPORT OF LABORATORY TESTS Project:Tucson Koi&Cactus-7310 North Oracle Road Oro Valley,AZ 85704 Source:TP-1 2.5'-4.0'Below the Natural Ground Grade Mechanical Analysis-ASTM D 2487 Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes ASTM Test Methods C136,D1140,D2216&D4318 Sieve %Retained %Passing Size Llndiv.) �Cumut.) 4" Liquid Limit 21 % 3" 0.0 100.0 Plastic Limit 19 % 2 1/2" 2.6 97.4 Plasticity Index 2 % 2" 12.5 84.9 Unified Soil Classification System: (SW-SM)well-graded sand 11/2" 3.1 81.8 with silt and gravel 1" 3.0 78.8 3/�" 0.8 78.0 Bitumen Content % 1/2" 1.8 76.2 Specific Gravity 3/8" 1.3 74.9 Moisture 2.30 % 1" 3.0 71.9 Absorption % #4 3.3 68.6 Weight/Cu.Ft.Rodded lbs.,Loose #8 7.0 61.6 Fineness Modulus 10 3.2 58.4 Organic Impurities 16 12.6 45.8 30 15.4 30.4 Abrasion(L.A.) % wear 100 rev. 40 7.2 23.2 % wear 500 rev. 50 5.3 17.9 Soundness(Sodium Sulfate)5 cycles 100 6.8 11.1 (Magnesium Sulfate)5 cycles 200 3.9 7.2 Potential Reactivity -200 7.2 Respectfully submitted, Southern Arizona Testing Laboratory lestieriese:thi M.L.Vick-Lab Manager Page 21 SOUTHERN ARIZONA TESTING LABORATORY P.O. BOX 2508 TUCSON, AZ 85702-2508 Ph: (520) 623-3331 Fax: (520) 623-3214 satl.tuc son@gmail.c orn February 3,2015 For: TUCSON KOI&WATER GARDENS,LLC C/O SOUTHWEST ENGINEERING P.O. BOX 31136 TUCSON,AZ 85751 Received:1/12/2015-AM Lab No.27761 Submitted by:SATL/M.L.Vick Marked:Native Soil-Sample#3 REPORT OF LABORATORY TESTS Project:Tucson Koi&Cactus-781ONorth Oracle Road Oro Valley,AZ 85704 Source:TP-1 4.0'-8.0'Below the Natural Ground Grade Mechanical Analysis-ASTM D 2487 Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes ASTM Test Methods C136,D1140,D2216&D4318 Sieve %Retained %Passing Size (Indio) (Cumul.) 4" Liquid Limit 3" Plastic Limit 21/2" Plasticity Index Nonplastic 2" Unified Soil Classification System:(SP-SM)poorly graded 11/I' sand with silt 1" 0.0 100.0 3/4" 0.4 99.6 Bitumen Content % 1/2" 1.0 98.6 Specific Gravity 3/8" 1.4 97.2 Moisture 3.40 % 1/4" 4.3 92.9 Absorption #4 5.6 87.3 Weight/Cu.Ft.Rodded lbs.,Loose #8 28.0 59.3 Fineness Modulus 10 7.4 51.9 Organic Impurities 16 13.5 38.4 30 11.3 27.1 Abrasion(L.A.) % wear 100 rev. % 40 4.7 22.4 % wear 500 rev. 50 4.1 18.3 Soundness(Sodium Sulfate)5 cycles 100 4.7 13.6 (Magnesium Sulfate)5 cycles 200 3.4 10.2 Potential Reactivity -200 10.2 Respectfully submitted, Southern Arizona Testing Laboratory M.L.Vick-Lab Manager Page 22 SOUTHERN ARIZONA TESTING LABORATORY P.O. BOX 2508 TUCSON, AZ 85702-2508 Ph: (520) 623-3331 - Fax: (520) 623-3214 satl.tucson@gmail.com February 3,2015 For: TUCSON KOI&WATER GARDENS,LLC C/O SOUTHWEST ENGINEERING P.O. BOX 31136 TUCSON,AZ 85751 Received:1/12/2015-AM Lab No.27762 Submitted by:SATL/M.L.Vick Marked:Native Soil-Sample#4 REPORT OF LABORATORY TESTS Project:Tucson Koi&Cactus-7810 North Oracle Road Oro Valley,AZ 85704 Source:TP-1 8.0'-11.5'Below the Natural Ground Grade Mechanical Analysis-ASTM D 2487 Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes ASTM Test Methods C136,D1140,D2216&D4318 Sieve %Retained %Passing Size Qndiv.) (Cumin.) 5" Liquid Limit 4" Plastic Limit 3" 0.0 100.0 Plasticity Index Nonplastic % 2" 2.3 97.7 Unified Soil Classification System: (SW-SM)well-graded sand 1 1" 5.3 92.4 with silt and gravel 1" 6.4 86.0 3/4' 3.7 82.3 Bitumen Content 1 " 4.4 77.9 Specific Gravity 3/8" 3.7 74.2 Moisture 3.90 % 1/4" 7.1 67.1 Absorption % #4 6.2 60.9 Weight/Cu.Ft.Rodded lbs.,Loose #8 11.4 49.5 Fineness Modulus 10 4.3 45.2 Organic Impurities 16 10.1 35.1 30 11.2 23.9 Abrasion(L.A.) % wear 100 rev. % 40 4.7 19.2 % wear 500 rev. % 50 3.5 15.7 Soundness(Sodium Sulfate)5 cycles 100 5.1 10.6 (Magnesium Sulfate)5 cycles 200 3.5 7.1 Potential Reactivity -200 7.1 Respectfully submitted, Southern Arizona Testing Laboratory 4.4e /1/14a M.L.Vick-Lab Manager Page 23 SOUTHERN ARIZONA TESTING LABORATORY P.O. BOX 2508 TUCSON, AZ 85702-2508 Ph: (520) 623-3331 -- Fax: (520) 623-3214 satl.tucson@gmail.com February 3, 2015 For: TUCSON KOI&WATER GARDENS,LLC C/O SOUTHWEST ENGINEERING P.O. BOX 31136 TUCSON,AZ 85751 Received:1/12/2015-AM Lab No.27763 Submitted by:SATL/M.L.Vick Marked:Native Soil-Sample#5 REPORT OF LABORATORY TESTS Project:Tucson Koi&Cactus-7810 North Oracle Road Oro Valley,AZ 85704 Source:TP-2 2.5'-9.0`Below the Natural Ground Grade Mechanical Analysis-ASTM D 2487 Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes ASTM Test Methods C136,D1140,D2216&D4318 Sieve %Retained %Passing Size (Indiv.) (Cumul.) 5" Liquid Limit % 4" Plastic Limit 3" Plasticity Index Nonpiastic 2" 0.0 100.0 Unified Soil Classification System:(SW)well-graded sand 1 i/z" 3.0 97.0 with gravel 1" 2.3 94.7 3/4" 0.8 93.9 Bitumen Content % 1/2" 1.4 92.5 Specific Gravity 3/8" 1.3 91.2 Moisture 2.00 % 3.7 87.5 Absorption #4 4.2 83.3 Weight/Cu.Ft.Rodded lbs.,Loose #8 11.7 71.6 Fineness Modulus 10 6.4 65.2 Organic Impurities 16 20.8 44.4 30 22.3 22.1 Abrasion(L.A.) % wear 100 rev. 40 7.2 14.9 % wear 500 rev. % 50 4.5 10.4 Soundness(Sodium Sulfate)5 cycles 100 5.1 5.3 (Magnesium Sulfate)5 cycles 200 1.7 3.6 Potential Reactivity -200 3.6 Respectfully submitted, Southern Arizona Testing Laboratory 7,40,0 ;eler°94e0k M.L.Vick-Lab Manager Page 24 C SOUTHWEST TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, LLC 8 April 2015 Scott Beck, PE Southern Region Traffic Engineer Arizona Department of Transportation 1221 S. Second Ave Tucson, AZ 85713 SUBJECT: TUCSON KOI & WATER GARDENS ORACLE ROAD SOUTH OF MAGEE ROAD TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT Dear Mr. Beck: Please find enclosed a brief traffic impact statement (TIS) regarding the proposed Tucson Koi & Water Gardens development located on the east side of Oracle Road, south of Magee Road in Oro Valley, Arizona. The site vicinity is located as shown in Figure 1. The project will consist of a new 1,800 square-foot garden nursery center on an approximately 2.8 acre site as shown in Figure 2. With the project expected to generate less than 100 trips during any one hour of the day, and per our discussion, ADOT will not require a traffic impact analysis for this project. However, the impact of the project on the adjacent street system will be addressed in this limited TIS. Existing Conditions Adjacent to the project site, Oracle Road is a six-lane roadway which currently provides three lanes in the northbound and southbound directions separated by a concrete median. An exclusive northbound left turn lane provides access to a shopping center on the west side of Oracle Road, across from the proposed site. Southbound vehicles are provided with an exclusive, continuous right turn lane that allows access into various commercial driveways on the west side of Oracle Road. No curb, gutter or sidewalks are present on the east side of Oracle Road near the project site. Overhead electric lines exist on the east side of Oracle Road however, overhead lighting is not provided on either the east or west sides of Oracle Road. An open drainage channel exists along the east side of the roadway. The posted speed limit on Oracle Road near Magee Road is 50 miles per hour(mph). 3838 North Central Avenue Ste 1810 Phoenix, Arizona 85012 p 602.266.SWTE (7983) f 602.266.1115 www.swte.us Scott Beck 8 April 2015 Page 2 As shown in Figure 1, the proposed Tucson Koi & Water Gardens project will be located on an undeveloped parcel of land adjacent to the existing Escondido Plaza Shopping Center on the east side of Oracle Road, south of Magee Road. Located within the shopping center is a grocery store, fast-food restaurants and various retail shops. No shared access between the Tuscon Koi & Water Gardens and Escondido Plaza Shopping Center is being proposed. Trip Generation Trip generation for the project was developed utilizing nationally agreed upon data contained in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) publication Trip Generation, 9rh Edition, 2012. Trip generation was estimated for the construction of 1,800 square feet of garden center space based on ITE Land Use Code 817, Nursery (Garden Center). The result of the weekday trip generation for the proposed project is shown below in Table 1. The complete trip generation calculations can be found attached to this TIS. Table 1 —Weekday Site Generated Trips Time Period Nursery Average Daily,Inbound(vtpd) 61 Average Daily,Outbound(vtpd) 61 Total Daily 122 AM Peak Hour,Inbound(vtph) 3 AM Peak Hour,Outbound(vtph) 2 Total AM Peak 5 PM Peak Hour,Inbound(vtph) 6 PM Peak Hour,Outbound(vtph) 7 Total PM Peak 13 vtpd-vehicle trips per day,vtph-vehicle trips per hour As shown in Table 1, the proposed facility is projected to generate an average of five vehicle trips during the AM peak hour and thirteen vehicle trips during the PM peak hour. The low volume of site-generated trips is not expected to impact traffic within the immediate project area. The development is proposing one new driveway which will be a"T" intersection located on the east side of Oracle Road, approximately 1,200 feet south of Magee Road. Northbound and southbound traffic on Oracle Road will remain free-flow while the new westbound approach will provide one right turn only lane and be STOP sign controlled. The site plans shows a driveway width of 35 feet. Scott Beck 8 April 2015 Page 3 With a low volume of expected trips and one right-in, right-out access point, the new development is expected to have limited impacts on existing traffic along Oracle Road. Thank you again for your time and review of this TIS. If you have any questions regarding the TIS, please feel free to contact me at 602.266.7983. • Respectfully Submitted, ;onaj , Qi` CATKfr• ();,. a/ 42636 ag CHRISTOPHER B. WILLIAMS, Chris Williams, PE, PTOE s; fliP 1,p� gn d •v S P• Southwest Traffic Engineering LLC Expires 6-30-17 cc: David Laws, Town of Oro Valley Daniel Tassone, Tucson Koi • Scott Beck 8 April 2015 Page 4 Figure 1 — Vicinity Map �,,,�°'`' N Dr .e a a••y.r., 4 w.n�r Sys 1 • ay I / V Project Location .. acre Rd s t' tie Mom. tip t 1 s is c` �0• s d ... k‘,04#*". w* 1 IL • T �lr r ... _� -,, l ' w -A, tis " i ..110110 * 'V t • ' • r * Ilt. ., • • o' r ;Mil �. I, .- / - . 7 7 4 f w ir , go `�. k,Ay A 46 • , 4.t...• ) e3, • 41.: - i:.4*. 1 `JA„t• , .4 4 J ' +,; + ., ,'"",'Al'' • 41�•y 4 JOINIF:itifr/(' f l• :" a '� $ s Pak10A, • mar 4 iliAriC" !• ' • • •r'Q71r `. Y t 3 4. „•4 t • , . .'.. s t ` .. � y mow. / tl � °IF 1 , ♦ �T� ♦•� 1 Y , EXISTING ZONING: PLAZAEscoNol�o tES: C-2 SHOPPING CENTER a� Property Size:2.8±Ac. JACK FURRIER'S Existing Zoning: R-S(1.4±Ac.)&R1-144(1.4±Ac.) TIRE CENTER 00 Existing General Plan Land Use: I Neighborhood Commercial/Office,with Growth Area Overlay L � 6"Water-- i -6"Water Proposed Zoning: CN Neighborhood Commercial(2.8±Ac.) ii Parking Spaces Provided= 19 L. L8„Sewer — Open Space Provided= 1.2±Ac. (44%) PROPOSED 10' PROPOSED ESTIMATED 100 YR \ FLOODPLAIN BUFFERYARD\ DETENTION BASIN ' ) -� — PROPERTY ' o 0 0 0 o a o o 0 0 o a e o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 SETBACKS ` ,-- -- --- PROPOSED l\ : R Xi WATER FEATURE& • DISPLAY GARDENS i' 1 l WROUGHT IRON &PLANTER BEDS SHADED SEATING AREA PROPOSED 35' FENCE BUFFERYARD / , . / / / 3 5'D.G. a) WALKING PATH 14W \-. / . �' I �' � � DISPLAY GARDENS �� � • o PROPOSED PROPERTY Z EROSION WATER FEATURE& ,`'' ommio# &PLANTER BEDS = SETBACKS - 2°) / OZ HAZARD SETBACK SHADED SEATING AREA N ' —8"sewer- ONZ U EXISTING CULVERT �'''' k t fi%e* ' Q PEDESTRIAN -- / / P� / Cr W # BRIDGE . Lu O / EXISTING WASH B `r / , W • V !' c2 C � RCE � . x Ov / Q co W PROPOSED �-+ Q R � ,,__ , , ' t/ 'i /—/—_ Qr SCREEN WALL �' `� Q ii SHADE SAILS EXISTING 20'ALLEY EXISTING ZONING: &UTILITY EASEMENT R1-36 PROPOSED 9'X17'PARKING ENTRY SIGN KOI 7'CONCRETE STALL(TYP.) , f /PoND/ SIDEWALK !1 LOADING • ' II r j ti - - - ' -- ZONES GREENHOUSE24'x35'RY SHOWROOMfr I1 900±SF/1-Story I o 800±SF -f- !a U 35 ngle-Story ` �. ,' �k�\\ w 5'CONCRETE _-�—_ / - - _ • a / --_- § SIDEWALK ,.}�-.. \ GREENHOUSE '' 900±SF/1-Story PROPOSED 15' 2—` ^ N N BUFFERYARD'B' 1 ' -"H"---- V'' • i I i ------------------------------------ /--------------- --------------------------------- ------- —�/ PROPOSED PROPOSED 15' 6'CMU i t DETENTION BASIN m BUFFERYARD'B' SCREEN WALL ' ka Co L SOUTHWEST PEACEFUL SPIRIT 3 p KITCHEN&BATH fq z_ w¢ EXISTING ZONING: TI 0 R-S The EXHBIT TUCSON KOI & WATER GARDENS 2014.08.28 0' So WLB Q: TENTATIVE SITE PLAN WLBNo.113036-A-001 Group L:\113036 Tucson Koi\A-001 Planning\Exhibits\Exh 0.tentative site plan 8.28.14.dwg Plotted Dec 12,2014 Nursery (Garden Center) LAND USE: 1,800 Square Feet Nursery (Garden Center) TRIP GENERATION CALCULATIONS ARE BASED ON THE INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS' TRIP GENERATION, 9TH EDITION. THE ITE LAND USE CODE IS Nursery (Garden Center) (817) WEEKDAY Average Rate = 68.1 Trips per 1000 Square Feet (SF) T = 68.1 Trips x 1800 SF / 1000 T = 122 VTPD ENTER: (0.5)*(122) = 61 VTPD EXIT: (0.5)*(122) = 61 VTPD AM PEAK HOUR (ONE HOUR BETWEEN 7 AND 9 AM) Average Rate = 2.43 Trips per 1000 Square Feet (SF) T = 2.43 Trips x 1800 SF / 1000 T = 5 VPH ENTER: (0.52)*(5) = 3 VPH EXIT: (0.48)*(5) = 2 VPH PM PEAK HOUR (ONE HOUR BETWEEN 4 AND 6 PM) Average Rate = 6.94 Trips per 1000 Square Feet (SF) T = 6.94 Trips x 1800 SF/ 1000 T = 13 VPH ENTER: (0.49)*(13) = 6 VPH EXIT: (0.51)*(13) = 7 VPH *where, T = trip ends TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY WEEKDAY 122 VTPD AM PEAK HOUR (ONE HOUR BETWEEN 7 AND 9 AM) 5 VPH PM PEAK HOUR (ONE HOUR BETWEEN 4 AND 6 PM) 13 VPH • ADO'I'Traffic Engineering Policies,Guidelines,and Procedures December 201,1 Section 200-Traffic Studies Exhibit 240-A. Traffic Impact Analysis Pre-Submittal Form Project Name:Tucson Koi & Cactus Developer/Owner: Bruce McDonald Phone Number: Email: Project Location State Route (with nearest MP or Street): SR 77(Approx. 1,000 feet south of Magee Rd..) Local Jurisdiction: Oro Valley Stage of Development(choose one) ❑ Planning/Zoning rif Development Plan Brief Description of Project (land use, intensity, timeframe/phasing) Proposed site will construct approximately 2,000 square-foot nursery Proposed Access (number, location, restrictions) One proposed right-in, right-out access to SR 77 Preliminary Assumptions (provide as attachment) • Trip Generation • Pass-By Or Internal Capture • Study Horizon Years C .ti\ C: • e Roadway Net k- NCE: 0 • Trip Distribution A t: • Study Area Intersections 1-TIC fl \ EV)A\-1 tLy Traffic Study Type (choose one) I Transportation Planning Study ❑ Traffic Impact Analysis s Traffic Impact Statement Traffic Study Preparer Firm Name: Southwest Traffic Engineering LLC Contact: Chris Williams Phone: (602)266-7983 Email: Chris@swte.us Pre-Submittal Forms are not required for each project but are a useful tool to reduce the number of submittals/reviews and aid development timeframes. When submitted, Regional Traffic Engineering staff will review and confirm the form in a timely manner. Changes to the above information should be provided in writing. A hard copy of an approved Pre-Submittal Form shall be included in the Study appendix. m 1 Approval by: 1 1 t C;�\..1 C'.� —'-J-Q-�=39 Date: \`-a� 2410-1d r4 DVO ) °1601, • Intermodal Transportation Janice K.Brewer,Governor John S.Halikowski,Director Jennifer Toth,State Engineer Robert Samour,Senior Deputy State Engineer,Operations Dallas Hammit,Senior Deputy State Engineer,Development May 8, 2015 Mr. Chris Williams, P.E., PTOE SouthWest Traffic Engineering, LLC 3838 North Central Avenue, Suite 1810 Phoenix, AZ 85012 Subject: SR 77 (Oracle Road) South of Magee Road, MP 75.6+/- Tr affic Impact Statement for Tucson Koi R, Water Gardens April 8, 2015 Dear Mr.Williams: This letter constitutes approval of the April 8, 2025 Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) for the Tucson Koi & Water Gardens development (1800 Square-foot garden nursery center on an approximately 2.8 acre site)to be located on the east side of the SR 77 (Oracle Road) south of Magee Road. We concur with the finding that the addition of the site generated traffic volume will have limited impact on the safety and efficiency of traffic operations on Oracle Road. Therefore, no roadway improvements will be required on Oracle Road as a result of this development. Access to the site will be provided by one new driveway to be located near the south boundary of the property. The new access will allow right-in/right-out movements only. The access will be 35 feet wide with 35 feet radii. A drainage report needs to be submitted for our approval. The drainage study should address how the development will affect the existing drainage and the need to add to or alter any existing drainage facilities in ADOT right-of-way. The developer/owner of the site will need to apply for a Highway Encroachment Permit prior to commencing work in ADOT right-of-way. Questions regarding the permit application siiuuiu be directed to Ms. Corrine Garey, Permits Technician III. Ms. Garey can be reached at 520-388-4225. To assist in obtaining an access permit, ADOT Tucson District has developed "Plan Design Guidelines for Permittees". A copy of the guidelines can be obtained from the Tucson District Permits Office. Site plans, driveway construction plans, and a signing and striping plan will need to be submitted as part of the permit application. The developer/owner of the Tucson Koi &Water Gardens development will provide 100 percent funding for any and all required work within ADOT right-of-way on SR 77 (Oracle Road) as a result of this development. ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 206 S.17th Ave. I Phoenix,AZ 85007 I azdot.gov Mr. Chris Williams, P.E., PTOE May 8, 2015 Page 2 All of the evaluation and planning for the development will need to be coordinated on a cooperative basis with the Town of Oro Valley to ensure that mutually acceptable conditions are arrived at. We are looking forward to working with the Town of Oro Valley and the developer/owner of the Tucson Koi & Water Gardens development toward the satisfactory completion of the project. Sincerely, kLi Maria Deal Transportation Engineering Specialist Southern Regional Traffic Engineering 1221 S. 2nd Ave. Tucson, AZ 85713 Phone#: 520-388-4235 C: Scott Beck, P.E., Southern Regional Traffic Engineer,ADOT Steve Mishler, P.E.,Tucson District Development Engineer,ADOT Corrine Garey,Tucson District Permits Technician Ill, ADOT David Laws, P.E., Permitting Manager,Town of Oro Valley 3 I 0 EXISTING ZONING: PLAZA ESCONOIDO NOTES: C-2 SHOPPING CENTER • Property Size:2.8i Ac. JACK FURRIER'S • Existing Zoning:R-S(1.4t Ac.)&R1-144(1.4t Ac.) TIRE CENTER • Existing General Plan Land Use: I x Neighborhood Commercial/Office,with Growth Area Overlay L — — 6"Water— --� 6"Water— • Proposed Zoning:CN Neighborhood Commercial(2.8t Ac.) — — • Parking Spaces Provided=19 - 3"Sever--- • Open Space Provided=1.2t Ac.(44%) ESTIMATED 100 YR PROPOSED 10' PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN BUFFERYARD DETENTION BASIN dr .. PROPERTY SETBACKS '-7 IONIMEMONIOMMIL \t a- 3 C - ------------ PROPOSED ' �� � WATER FEATURE 8 DISPLAY GARDENS --SHADED SEATING AREA WROUGHT IRON PROPOSED 35' &PLANTER BEDS /� s FENCE BUFFERYARD � O , i ' 5'O.G. `---- �✓, s 01 WALKING PATH t \ so, -� �._ Or CeZI, �' �a� A • ,eimer...:-",,,-.1 1 \ C� PROPOSED a4. -0. •'ISPLAY GARDENS ' I PROPERTY 2 EROSION WATER FEATURE& r , , &PLANTER BEDS / . I SETBACKS HAZARD SETBACK a O SHADED SEATING AREA - %g, tiO EXISTING CULVERT I __ __g"Sewer x o r 3 \ 4`4 , PEDESTRIAN / ' ti O BRIDGE c9 N \ \ `f \ —` EXISTING WASH BEDirJ —� �` ` ,. S PROPOSED CREEN WALL I \\ VI . SHADE SAILS EXISTING 20'ALLEY EXISTING ZONING: PROPOSED ' 1 � � W I I' &UTILITY EASEMENT R1-36 ENTRY SIGN s "` g4 t L.. ```"1', KOI 7'CONCRETE 9STALL(TYP.G, ' I' //-v POND SIDEWALK �OAbING to j ��• ` --/ ' +` „.Y ZONE] GREENHOUSE I O URSERY SHOWROOM Sa C� - - r 1 243.I` 900tSFF/1-Story am J 35' Single-Story a O OP13111;CONCRETE -'� ____ �� i — � SIDEWALK ----"'_-���"�. /- GREENHOUS � 900t SF/1Story PROPOSED 15' 1, ———— BUFFERYARD'B' PROPOSED 15' PROPOSED BUFFERYARD'B' 6'CMU '� DETENTION BASIN SCREEN WALL 3 i� r SOUTHWEST PEACEFUL SPIRIT O KRCHEN&BATH s 2 2 r' y3 0 w EXISTING ZONING: 1' a RS I • The WEE TUCSON KOI & WATER GARDENS © �� cog EXHIBIT Q:TENTATIVE SITE PLAN t tIOM Tucun KafWaOt i4ninyEJlAE.n°.MrYlw M,d.llG.t,.yQ am¢Dc il,dlt, a 54 4 WI - • ESC N t d 0 f)LAZA'', , . , .. - --..... a, , ale , ..:. if. .r. " .41-7.* 7 ' - .., „-• -'..-- • ,' ,It I `NemAIMIalmai....e•• ' j Pl • t / M. II' t,. .:., _.....,..� U. 1 i C. ' 1 al ' 'j Jlit, -1.1. It c cl .1 _if. ..11 ..A.:1; / i IA/ 4.1 ag 1 XI f `� i •- t IID !` SUS y t' r riir , -.: -, f "'�!I+� .I X ,, .......i.l.. -.. —_1�r • SUBJECT rr . f • �, s . P RO �Y` <. .yam - ✓< f PERTY • Y ..ii-xi „14.‘., ` • a 4 e , . ,;,$##4;-. ''' ,- . - '-• i 41 -•r"".1- "-4.- 1,, -..-' ., .... - ' 04 tr3N.. ip*07. . y • tt . At . . .; , 0.;••,,, ?•.;,,, • -i :..-'• ‘***1418,•if• ' k *14_1 4- lie 4"tr."•-•IP 4" :'' . i , f* . • e d a ¢r r �. t a ,- r ' • v t ki- �., .. - '., / _. ,.t ' ' :&i,„7...**T'all:::: :‘'.14:1/4.,..... �• <3 ts • '.°. A ''. .-,. .1,.. . li....' 1't.'i g k Itikk.a dt '101 '1' .< 0 : ,_ :::;;C‘‘ ::',1','il':.:.:: 4,,1 • .,*,-" ,,,, 7 _ ,7 , ` r , :-. it ...,•_ >. at ,_.. #� a:...g „'- ;,.s.k, ,F�,-t - - t.;.. r� x .t • _ ♦ f - ,g • ` ',. + ! -s '� - — — ' '` • i } .Iy¢yam-., 1 } **4 "- -';';::' ' ..' --.‘ .. ir , - sl,':•,,,,..,. .•-•- v IV. " , ---... , , . 4 v _ > i.,. }.' ..•;� ,,.,. S-.,�,_- e.. + .. *•• *y! 4 ,a.. 0 '+r ! .. ' -a _ - r .sue. :j ..,. . d - • _ s t` - QJ fA� • , a • , r w' } < _ z s> fLt. h =. C. 4. , <,„,,,,7.,,,,,...., ,.ii , . �. ‘. ; :. <� • i • "+ •r Y ,,r- rr.r.rrt •t. ! _ ` � • "\iia. �. : Li' rr .s r .., . -.DEil2triti:.."4....,.40wmola_ 314.- - t.,, ' ) - : t• , > 1, _ t i,, . x r 1 . rt n 1 � . 1. . r lit ,. ! .... ..._ _. �.. ...� h _ 1 t � . _... 1 ,,, % ,,,, : , , : I. 04i 1 ►f 'ilki " i , flit'4' '-"C.''...a ' `.4 ':4/11,,' ,,*; 5 )-v Ai . • • s.♦" 6 ''S e a. rt t .* ' .S„ iiiiiiiiiitti, ''' j . • The TUCSON KOI & WATER GARDENS 2014.0210 ` /\ 0' 100' WLB ,_ EXHIBIT B: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH Aerial Photo Date=2013 Grou WLB No 113036-A-001 ' „ L.--11---1 2 „ L:\113036 Tucson Koi\A-001 Planning\Exhibits\Exh B.Aerial.dwg Plotted:Feb.19,201413 . m ° e • JAS ENGINEERING Jeffrey A. Stanley, P.E. P.O. Box 1888 Tucson, Arizona 85702 Telephone (520) 390-7920 stanley19263@msn.com December 15, 2015 Development and Infrastructure Services Town of Oro Valley DEC 2 3 LOIS j 11000 North La Canada Drive Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 Attn: Fritz Laos and Josh Potter Re: Tucson Koi and Cactus Gardens—OV 1501011 Drainage Report Dear Fritz and Josh: This letter is meant as a response to drainage report comments outlined in an August 11, 2015 memorandum regarding the referenced project. The following are responses to each comment that pertains to the drainage report. Drainage Report(Fritz Laos & Josh Potter) 95. Stormwater retention is not permitted in Oro Valley. Remove all references to retention in the drainage report. RESPONSE: Completed. 96. Clarify the post-developed Qroo. It is stated as 17 cfs in one location and 16 cfs in another. RESPONSE: We revised this portion of the report; however, the post-development peak discharge is 18 cfs. 97. Water harvesting is required for this project and can account for the project site detention requirements at a 1:1 volume ratio. However, the maximum depth of water harvesting permitted is 4". In addition, discuss the method of water harvesting that is proposed for this project. 4 ' RESPONSE: Passive water harvesting is part of the project plan. All water harvesting areas are a maximum of 4"deep. 98. Provide additional discussion in report regarding the project detention volume required and the volume provided, including water harvesting, and any additional basins that may be required to meet the detention requirements. RESPONSE: Detention has been provided for the project based on peak discharges exiting the site. Discussions are included in the report. 99. Delineate the basin areas on the drainage exhibit. Include the detention volume, ponding depth, top and bottom elevations of the basin and basin outfall location/structures. In addition, provide calculations and/or additional discussion to indicate that the basins must drain in a maximum of 12 hours. RESPONSE: There are not any onsite detention basins. Each of the water harvesting areas is labeled with area, depth, and volume. Only one of the basins has an outfall and it is labeled on the drainage display map. Each water harvesting area is only 4"deep so that percolation will occur in the required 12-hour time period. 100. Provide post-developed watershed boundaries and the pre-post developed Q1oo at all points that drainage exits the south. (i.e. discharge along the south property line) RESPONSE: The existing discharge across the south boundary is shown on the Existing Conditions Map (Watershed A, Q100 = 1.1 cfs). The post development discharge across the south boundary is 1 cfs. 101. Provide additional discussion regarding the maintenance procedures and responsibility for the basin. RESPONSE: There is not an onsite detention basin. Maintenance is discussed in the report for water harvesting areas and first flush filters. 102. This project is required to provide first flush measures for run-off from paved parking areas. Provide discussion for the first flush requirements and proposed mitigation measures. In addition, indicate the location of the first flush measures on the final site plan. RESPONSE: First flush has been incorporated into the onsite drainage design. Discussions and calculations are included in the report. A T-Dam style of filter will be used(see detail on the Drainage Display Map). 103. Provide minimum finished floor elevations in the text for the proposed buildings that are adjacent to the floodplain. RESPONSE: Completed. The FFE is about 1.94' above the water surface elevation in the wash. 104. Provide post-developed floodplain limits within the project boundaries. The modeling of the post-developed floodplain shall include the bridge structure and any potential backwater effects. RESPONSE: Completed. An analysis in the report shows a potential increase in water surface of 0.07', which will not create any adverse effects to the site or adjacent properties. The floodplain limits have been adjusted at the bridge abutments. 105. The report indicates that the structure will not span the entire floodplain width. Will water overtop the structure? Is the structure designed to withstand the impact of impeded flow and/or overtopping? RESPONSE: The lower deck of the bridge will be above the water surface elevation and should not be impacted by the wash. I believe that all of the comments have been addressed in the revised report. If there are any questions or if clarification is needed, I can be reached at 390-7920 or by email at stanley19263@msn.com Sincerely, /9)152. Stanley, .E. HYDROLOGIC/HYDRAULIC REPORT FOR TUCSON KO! AND CACTUS (7776 N. Oracle Road) Within Section 36, T12S, R13E Oro Valley, Arizona Prepared for: Tucson Koi and Water Gardens 3320 East Allen Road Tucson, Arizona 85718 Ramirez-Goldberg Properties 3372 N Dodge Rd Tucson, AZ 857116 Prepared by: JAS Engineering PO Box 1888 Tucson, Arizona 85702 (520) 390-7920 4, . .:_... �. December 15, 2015 �ZkFICAre Q �� G 19263 JEFFREY A. Vertical Datum - NAVD 88 sTAraLEY AN AC: s9�ea, 48/ZONA,t1•`'P 30, 2 01 S� TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 OBJECTIVES 1 PROCEDURES 1 RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS 2 OFFSITE WATERSHEDS 2 ONSITE EXISTING 2 ONSITE DEVELOPED 3 FIRST FLUSH 4 MAINTENANCE 5 SUMMARY 5 REFERENCES 6 LOCATION PLAN 7 FEMA MAP 8 404-COMPLIANCE STATEMENT 9 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH 10 DRAINAGE DISPLAY 11 EXISTING CONDITIONS MAP 12 DEVELOPED CONDITIONS MAP 13 APPENDIX A- HYDROLOGIC DATA OFFSITE WATERSHED MAP HYDROLOGIC SOILS MAP HYDROLOGIC DATA SHEETS FIRST FLUSH VOLUMES TOTAL RUNOFF VOLUMES APPENDIX B-HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS MANNING'S CROSS-SECTIONS SCOUR CALCULATION SHEET CULVERT DATA SHEET WEIR OPENINGS ROCK CHANNEL SECTIONS INTRODUCTION This report represents a Hydrologic/Hydraulic Study for the proposed Tucson Koi and Cactus project located at 7776 North Oracle Road. The approximate 2.7-acre proposed development is located within Section 36, Township 12 South, Range 13 East, Gila and Salt River Meridian, Pima County, Oro Valley,Arizona(see Location Map). The project site is not located in a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Special Flood Hazard area. Included herein is a copy of the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate (FIRM), panel #04019C1680L, for Pima County,Arizona and Incorporate Areas, effective date: June 16, 2011. There are not any washes that are under the jurisdiction of the Army Corps of Engineers for compliance with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (a compliance statement is contained herein). There is some riparian habitat C within the project limits. Detention and first flush requirements have been addressed for the project. OBJECTIVES The objectives of this report are as follows: Evaluate drainage conditions at the site. Propose site improvements, which will safely contain and convey storm runoff in accordance with established regulations. Provide hydraulic information for all drainage improvements. Address detention requirements. PROCEDURES Peak discharges for onsite existing and developed conditions were determined using the accepted Pima County PC-HYDRO method (Ref. 1). Hydrologic data, including data sheets, a watershed map, and a soils map are included in Appendix A. Based on the soil survey conducted by the U.S. Soil Conservation Service, the project site falls within one soil category, Palos Verdes — Sahuarita Complex, which is 50% soil type B and 50% soil type C. Standard basin factors of 0.034 (pre-development) and 0.034 (post-development)were used for dispersed flow. Manning's equation was used to for open-channel flow hydraulic calculations that were then used to determine floodplain limits. Manning's equation was also used to determine the minor encroachment resulting in the construction of the bridge across the wash. Onsite riprap channels were sized based on Manning's equation as well. A scour calculation was performed based on the City of Tucson method. Standard weir equations were used to determine scupper opening 1 sizes and for the outlet to water harvesting area #2 (trapezoidal). All calculation results are included in Appendix B. A formal detention basin has not been used for the project. Instead some of the project area will be used to passively water harvest the rainfall that lands within the specific area. Some of the site will completely retain the entire volume of runoff draining to the water harvesting area thereby removing it from the contributing watershed. A separate water harvesting plan is part of the overall project. Drainage areas developed as part of this report were used in developing the water harvesting plan. First flush requirements as outlined by the Town of Oro Valley have been incorporated. All of the paved areas will drain to one of three onsite first flush T-Dam type filters. First flush volumes have been tabulated and included in Appendix A. Runoff volumes for each onsite drainage area were tabulated and are included in Appendix A. Volumes are based on equation 3.1 in the Pima County Department of Transportation and Flood Control District/City of Tucson, Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual (Ref. 3). RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS OFFSITE WATERSHEDS There are two existing offsite watersheds that discharge onto the property. Minor flow (Q100 8 cfs, A= 0.8 acres) enters the site from the commercial development adjacent to the north. The main flow enters the site from the east and exits at the west boundary (Oracle Road right-of-way line) A total watershed area of 166 acre discharges at Oracle Road in the existing condition. The anticipated flow rates are: Q 100 = 799 cfs Q 10=310 cfs Q2=92 cfs ONSITE EXISTING An Existing Conditions Display that is included in Appendix A shows the 100-year floodplain associated with the aforementioned 799 cfs. All of the flow from the 166 acre watershed is collected upstream of Oracle Road where there is an existing three barrel 8' x 4' concrete box culvert. A culvert data sheet that shows the ponded water surface elevation at the culvert entrance is included in Appendix B. There is no current onsite development. Under existing conditions about 2.1 acres of the overall 2.7 acre site drains to an unnamed wash that traverses the site from east to west. Approximately 0.16 acres drains across the south boundary of the site before being conveyed over to the right- of-way (Watershed A, Q100= 1.1 cfs). Watershed B (Q100 =2.8 cfs, 0.42 acres) drains directly to Oracle Road. All of this flow immediately drains to the south on the east side of the roadway within the right-of-way. Below are the flow rates for watersheds A and B. 2 Watershed A(to south) Q100= 1.1 cfs Q10=0.4 cfs Q2=0.1 cfs Watershed B (to west) Q100=2.8 cfs Q10= 1.2 cfs Q2 =0.3 cfs Under existing conditions the entire 2.7 acre site discharges the following flow rates. Hydrologic data sheets are included in Appendix A. Q 100= 18 cfs Q 10= 7.5 cfs Q2 = 1.8 cfs ONSITE DEVELOPED About 0.6 acres of the site will be developed into driveways and vehicular use areas, parking areas, a bridge, buildings, sidewalks, and water harvesting areas. The remaining approximate 2.1 acres will either remain natural,be landscaped, or will be part of the northern plant display area. The 0.6 acres are divided into 6 onsite watersheds. Hydrologic data sheets for each drainage area are included in Appendix A. A summary of the 100, 10, and 2-year storms is listed on the Drainage Display. The summary also includes the First Flush volume for those drainage areas that include paved surfaces. Drainage areas 1, 4, and 5 do not generate First Flush flows. First Flush volumes are also in a table within Appendix A. Developed conditions show that there will be four onsite water harvesting areas that will each be a maximum of 4 inches deep. This depth will enable the runoff to percolate within the required 12-hour time period. Details of these areas are shown on the Drainage Display Map. The effect that the capacity of the water harvesting areas has on each storm event is that during the 100-year storm only 2.5 acres will drain from the site (the remaining 0.2 acres is captured). Anticipated flow rates are: Q100= 18cfs Q10=9.Ocfs Q2= 3.6cfs Results are that the 100-year storm remains the same and the 10-year and the 2-year storms increase. However, flow rates are minor and it is more important that runoff volumes are not reduced. Most of the flow from the site drains into the main wash where downstream flows are expected and are provided for. The more potentially problematic situation is the flow in the right-of-way. It is these flows that have been mostly reduced. The only discharges from the site directly into the right-of-way are from watersheds 5 and 6. Total flows from these two watersheds, which can be compared to Watershed B, are: Q100=2.1 cfs Q 10= 1.1 cfs Q2= 0.5 cfs Regarding the flow into the right-of-way (Watershed B), results are that the 100-year storm is reduced by 0.7 cfs, the 10-year by 0.1 cfs and the 2-year is essentially to same (0.5 cfs compared to 0.3 cfs). 3 Runoff rates across the southern boundary (Watershed A) are almost the same as pre-developed conditions. It was important to keep flow to the south because there is some landscape in the area. Developed flow rates are: Q100 = 1.0 cfs Q10=0.4cfs Q2=0.1 cfs The 100-year storm was reduced from 1.1 to 1.0 cfs while the 10 and 2-year storms remain the same. The impact to the flow rates in the main channel is minimal. As a consequence of the onsite development a total of 2 acres will drain to the wash. This results in a total of 165.9 acres discharging at Oracle Road. Hydrologic data sheets in Appendix A show the following rates: Q 100 = 799 cfs Q 10=310 cfs Q2 =92 cfs All of peak discharges remain the same. There will be a service and pedestrian bridge that connects the south and north halves of the development. The bridge will span the low flow portion of the wash but will not span the entire 100-year floodplain; however, the decking will be above the 100-year water surface elevation. Because the bridge will be located about 135 feet from the east boundary there will not be an issue resulting from a potential minor backwater. To check this, a basic analysis was done to determine the effect of the abutment encroachment into the overbank area of the floodplain. The analysis was performed using Manning's equation for a cross-section at the abutment. Results (in Appendix B) indicate that the water surface may rise about 0.07' (less than an inch). Essentially the encroachment will have no adverse impact to the floodplain nor will it create a backflow area that would affect adjacent properties. A scour analysis (see Appendix B) was performed for the main cross-channel where the bridge will be located. The abutments will be protected by grouted rock riprap,which will have a 3' toe down to match the scour depth. A second option will be to lower the abutment base so that it is at least three feet below the wash bottom. The onsite building must have a finished floor elevation (FFE) that is at least one-foot above the flow in the main wash. Based on the location of the building and interpolating between the water surface elevation at cross-sections 3 (2585.27) and 4 (2583.4), the water surface at the east end of the building will be about 2584.91. Consequently, the FFE must be at least 2585.91. The planned FFE is 2587.85, which is 1.94' above the water surface elevation in the wash. FIRST FLUSH First flush flows will be directed to three onsite scuppers that will include T-Dam style filters (see detail on the Drainage Display Map). Per the detail each scupper will include a depressed area so that the filter will be utilized for at least the first 0.5 inches of rainfall. When higher flow 4 26 25 25130 35 36� ' • ---- �- I 36 31 , ED .4. A i PP' -- I , k4(.:• _ • =. ,..4---, ,- - __ ,,! , - . , AS 110 ' ' Arttilln1110,4161,64 THIS PROJECTLi5OFFAo•ii— '„\ ' o 4Cn v ��N "' gis3WiwtritStA.,.. 1 / 4c-) tTefil' .4 4:(111 011 i- 35 36 �i _, - .,.. _ r' iNA 36 31 02 01 ROAD 01 06 LOCATION MAP S T12S R13E SECTION 36 G&SRM TUCSON, ARIZONA 3"= 1 MILE NOTES TO USERS LEGEND The map is,or use.n admn.ttervg the Naeonil F.el lesdance Prcaram n ST•ECIAL ROOD HAZARD Aar.51.I33ELT TO INUIMTION don not moths.,Path,as areas suede:,to Parana parboaoh Irons bcsl 1!E ANNUALCHANa ROOD dram,salvoes at smNl sue The conouni,map Ieposaay sM.:b M I ,h [Ama.Xedfor pos.,updated a ed..c.Po.heard e.t.a.on -a'r.-i f t �.rvs PANEL.GId 'N'-�F•a FT E5S)T)F JOINS P<VEL+G1E 1000000 FT v t• M t.rat i .eaJ•:or coo fed In avthuaripa s.lava Musa.bed a nn a de TO Klan mac del•kb iMormate M areas atnere Base Flood E4vanon• >:-"Ct • 1j.. r -- r r •.. _�. e- • - ..'Si ath s ar s ro calm a cat s In aisle m eat the Saran.b.•d Nrw a de (BEEN and.Rooftops have been dea.ned uxss a••enCarna d to emote ` - W y an also,ro Fn•„nl b de:+:sat..RrA Rest d tgrpal F•cd rNaA ud�e �I( tees A AG,rY,AG m.•5f.v,oaf,_M ease fboe Fathom a the waded. the Flood Ord.and FY-Wway Dm ehd.'a Srmmar,d:NMmyr.Elev.. - i.4�♦�j • 1 -- .... b•Ja - ele.xe,elh t,tneeld.vicelted boles con dined vat.the Flood Imam.51WY n ratio ton sponsor., '+ •` W 1 --• 1• - - -_ •2 ♦ •- - 20W. fa.R d 9thaaaa dc[omm1. Ws FIRkI Was snadd be owme q,BFEt slam on,he FIRM "n 1 •• • • - A - Handed whole-loot elevations West BFEI are meMac ea lead neuranu r g �' '"' - r. v -j••y *`t L J'' _. - !t>E AE Awe ibodtievtmsmtarwvt ranaq puposef anti and shc,dd nd ee used al the solo sat.d Iced a. 13 I - 20SEAN l the Rot to,am d pone+*), a pod eNva,on olana: Ar dT.pldy focal elevation M,a presented m.PS �•iF :. • ..� ' ••• •1f�rt�(It' _ ,_ •- t.e..m'm) N report should» 10 d th canpmetan with the FIRM tar oaths.d 5000W FT' - i .1y' >i' h •Q. .a- dy` :J- -:.1 • J_, - • - Sena AO Pmddeph+dta•3M lu>eN s/a4 Rw mdrywq wood):F .....lase..Motblsn Management • • - to ` 2. -- r0 sea d allnp.,an=;OMIa:r. co...Bose Flood Bova..Mann on Ms i 0 Ape,only lammed d i •'n% y t t - tT aroaa at�lmw.f 0 Cr fbnh A.M.Vertical OM.eat 11e8 MAUD FS.Ours d N.n ARM should _ : >J _ t'"!C�.- MmmM 6e aware INN padsltl food...tons,!AEa paraded In the JfdrinNY d y -- ZOEE Alt 9+awa.Sf,[rernnathaahwrtea'.dh,m,N l.tr..1.AA tt ,� _ :,`,y ROdb(aefoa[madfrTam an"aftaa[tFeml agars i.Y.e OR Mathew E!evat:ro table n coo Flood Inn..Steer report.p sus,aA•4:for low} y Y (. • Y ms.Ica lord lea...Hen rs trot moth.dada f)8 aT t (C�j� 1 e(mtb't oat • Bs t >i min re SumnvlY d SCTrin E1nMnu.s tape•ItatlJ LN•uaM fa [yM1 .�, d ,421.i... y• - • ��se,:.. re[ wont r,vm oona.uabe e a noroC•aa manr.•men p.ryo,n wnM they sera n.Mr:ran ..--t.�NN.�, a Yip}E i 9 F Yam+ t / - ,:,r r tort,£seen macM'n 4.Isre ;67 fcc,av•,roe it Rene q-.eva!bns anoarn m this F WM. • vil y l?> X{ e . _ - _ m.m..,e •?^'F2G Bounder.d the Medway,'were[am,wa•d n aria theta.and t.«pdatw "-��.I . e a rS / - '.� � . > ,• • f "81°`N tax v Gxaf scud,e-e.a.Mod,twad 1•..e atlmS m ex Fos between Cress leder.The 11...a.5 arc..bated m*Mato oatLdNalero - - trtabn mmM WV,reps$m aao•man.er Iry N...I Nod Mftra ce Ragan Floc., n. .1 i -•Y '< } fi' i r .. Ts 2anE M enN Uri me at.Mth as:ad!tote .l Msa Fool wMnI and other avowal IlMdw ay data are then:ad n Ns Flood Y.fwanu j aU '� / • 1. _ helm+osemw.a oludy report fa lti,..11s1t.11 _-� R M+r' a \ a•. L ` • • fLOCA,W1 AREAS N 2Q1E Ab CenOn Ater rat in Soo.Flood Nearer Arras may ten proleCleJ ar flood 3 _ . •♦.;` of*• w •A1f'Fr Y ,••\ - .1 T.e ktil 4'•M1a FLOODW 9.ceerS Ill2Cp[aa ROASI'namu,Nl r't e+f0/lee Onhvl fM1uaurOs.Reler 1 Eer•nn 2.•feoA FtelKdrn aleSaei:oar.: a. .. .�..d(► U " - - dean Yvn.v[,1`• an 1\a":.!: eat T.M..a..ea.•hertsL•,er =-12..: Fkdd Ms.umGe SI:Ny r!'po11 la eYamallOn M anal rMNtd Vn>Jufla lot Ws T ; l •]c ` -•` �- [a n.0,,a., ....on. ham`. - f"" l • .7•� - - OfIRR FLOOD AREAS • • Trio pralsdbn used n Pe papa/aeon el Ims mop was An muse Cad.Sate / • . Li. - j✓ Y e -• '•2pR rI a of VA anlN moo t Rath torte PIPSZONE 3202d eeerr•banel Feel The horleomal datum was a q e11rN5. .L '„• aaa ants d Ik e t o fled wan MD 83,IGGNNaRtI GR.°sohetad Waren:es.atrium.spool,prq.3taon ,, ,•7.,y.a>,- :•� I elf -1 I fgw•'.'„F.rol arlm[dpr ld'[[a M.-,:«,ralrte ernca of Sate Mane acres used a.M predation d Fthr,br mac.nalsa-sons , [ • _ • a _y `N,* may Iesu9 n stew pommel delmencea n nap'[et Gans jaadv.Een • F.. 1j' . ;•..L.' • ..�• I I OTNER AR. N Awes.There Path..re r.Ol Wed led oaths,of Me FIR41 s,� . t �. •`- , epees Sala(1....0earudeee 0.....fusee110..1. • Flora e'etaVons on Its map ate Were..la the Noah American Venkal Vahan •• • •'• -"f" ! • • .a • of 19e8.these Mod efavoten1 must be 01.01 d to sauctha and Pound - _ - _ _ f _ 2pED Mr t. BA RMiaadsUR are are...,SYSTEM(mv:)A•. T _. a'E ® COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM(YBRS)WFAS •b atom bXC'ed to the cant•rout,datum with For Bathos of 19 ra and theine °' n_ - • - N s bet.eM 1M Datum Gt9e8 v al tacal D.°.m of ISM Su q< ' ��. - I f t `� OTHERWISE MOfECTED AREA$(OPAS) North A!rc VMiW C•N.n d l9!/.vial the NalanM Geodesc S.rvey M500C iT •�I r.Tt+l 'Sr., ,robed at 11,.2st Wes nos no0a oar or contact the National Gaeetc 3unen a • • , } - [�,/.}j _ 1 _i i. 't1. '-1 l _. ceraa.ecase.�otwavrdtwrt-v.rl.'emar,furda mwurRoa,Nu.d aa..s the T�.Ig ddNess i.- • A • • � • 'fgt.,•Ip/I- � f• .. • . '•� l'eannd cOnce flap.Mu., • NOS INormSbn Services _• •• • •• -'. • - _• •••'♦1��'� • • _ 0.t!1.meek..Mar.b w. Natant SINGS. Si., _ . • _• -a`1 S>; l-t • ,11 E i - • -• 1T a - s a ..-. Rath.tuwy SShC-3.r92D2 • - l _ �a - ay'. :71e 1 t •y. •- Silva Spmq.Maryland.310-3292 • _ • • `f - • - -R 'F ;Set)Tn.321` • `: T r; - {- >D r- • -r e _ .. &'ry.a.)rq s>.I roan was an.zo..m.d A- • r ., ~-lr✓@,y.Ndr.•pmdimee Mar•Matdd.iN.r'9ae To than NnmN fe,atm,deaa.pim.end',bl Aran rdJ mJi.a tor anal ^'� • ' - - - node...neaa<epm:ar oath w.ua- marks Mown on Ns,sup please canted the hdarrotnn Soothes Branch -] �_, / `�- - -••••••..4 rt.' • a s' J ,L _ !_} -.-leutdraodvae'apeAram d the Nat...Geodetic Survey al Boll T13.32.12 cr vas es weMt•J IPF // e• F.a rea...wreenaaa'Fr. _ - r � y f,`�,�qe . •. t _ >�7 - './r •-....3TJ-..... tee Reno fixemtnt a1.the remW,n lies• f • ��F . _ • - r -. ith thee balm�ay..Iert memthen sae,dMm Bathp.Mcmmatian sham on IYa FIRM nos dewed hp•t mWyle aau'cc. ) a } - - - WI Bak math,her eastern Ana Com,se x erm.1 m Om.limn by the -I f J ♦.+` • �' s. Pen.ape..of GoernmMts.There fusevae aev,aped,lfca Ground avfr.LAEUa _...-. • _ : "�"' • ..,Y [ - `, e �,r�� - �� •Me'sawm d.w[Fanl.M.nvan vmealtwvn7 a•Me Sa d Deana IGSD,hen cda Ronal 1'ha•a9,aph noon.•.2002 Raft•nap •wa.cns V P y, a • -arrA- •',--;- .s. o---Q Om..... mage,lot western IAnv Carey nth dem.from USW Muth,avaiaCN to '- >r I ' ti - --• / • * of J' • '''"N llav[t Ma the Stele of Arden and prod.CW a a saute of 1.12000 flans Mwlogephy dated , �s}� - d - .f..`rIF A t .,v 20051..0' .7F••� Y I, ♦ �•s,�7,R. ' .JE! 1 1r er'OT'ID",32.27". sear.'.cruel(wntA.,MernJ.[e?.•=-"••Mmrm The mep ma+.e1.1 met detaad end[pt-dale Imam Ow/Mg4. •1 -_.____Li•NB„IT r•a r _ - s fit a.rw�rr.w:wreNx,m ear.a":F mate e aethpratt ra.tan these sham M the previous FlaAI la oho.1,1,-p.T. • TIBC9�t aIt'l)x1fEr71I f -s 3 _ _ S.•a_ - w _ t •7a"'N . aeon Awed aM!ttdc nF 1M1 wen Ira,a earn handle pld,tur a FIRM may haw a _ - '..tea[ - ft vmmer r.f f.n.•tr., •••a,•r.. both aQlOCdN[pia,nbg.OSC Mt NIe]m cMnn!I CCId/gulahes Aa itplR. Vt J ,T .'.. N rl rl .. �n.., g•. '. -. �F`, ..y • f00000FT CHYadl marlaD'ii01[E102).TRrevefeN�td dok[no^ the Flood Pm..and Reod.Data tables n.Feat'Imvance Study Raton 3 ..a - J.. .F••• a,ai ate• - - I • •�TI > .. Iwhchcolant ltlUlae.1,0laac dole,may wtoot slrean chamw..Ke4 �, l l _ - ,~ _ e. - a Syr 1 _ - t f,�,.a - 1 N? G.aa.uert;,ee ed..lnlR•m Um!eee.ddn Ina sera•from waseu slaws on dm map. j t.* 1 , ' -•; s 1i�} • 4r -e'' _T -0 DAS.>. RAl pea) CAspOraY fgrs tnawn M iX.s mW Ca trod on Ins Ma dke nx1Mh r the • •'�' I •• -... > - :t �-�/ .j•D!'T• T.r�,"y •� F f'th •MI.5 Poe,. bate d Ftatcntirt.B�aae f.angas nro ra or,.tr,eam a da.•.n.ranrn.mep a A • J •x r r1 E P•A .� -'•f -ate • •, " s♦♦-,1.:; ••• _ v �aaoar have open.after the map nes pobthhed rep Use:s teal anlxtepOOMae •T as > a i !a Y y Aew•I,wp['Act F.pmtWam Ny1%•. comm.,off.,:a vedy a.nml aapame hm.1.a[a. .l t u, • • •-.ta 7�1.•L a L. 4, y 4.;;;'['�, - `. Passe refer to see separate,meted Nap Inge,fir en moo d ux -j t 1 r\r -- i ' _..-..; N .�.�F' r a '�,J,[ia•- S - :` •• _ _ see.a < e�ECGOOnr�,7:,`E a.'icrtan'." enemy r,wve,p the trrcul d map rowel.:mmm.m:,map Roth,adart•Ner _ 1• 7 - i'•' a u -".7 w,:m and a list.d Comra11101..'Ole cont.,HOMO fend Inasrice program ya - ; , +r9 • C y' ef ..y. `;-r ti■ r r Jt T �. .__. • v. v. , C- -'t••thiy 13. - •,i•!'al..,. • t • _ Semen Coder;MSCI webae al Ire-.cadent.py thralls.pods.coati 1.: 't •,i -s a•.i y ./t �a.Y• �h - � •fi4 _ v. :m. ma,a•nrowbuay...ed Leiters cl Was Chpge.a Rood...once S,tdY Repan - ' _ Ca1tt egltad verses d this map.Many al these emduda can be ordered or e_: •' •♦,.�. t• .'_ -1' .- .. - - In tamm, ry y L� •-• •w �• T ry • Ire.•plw b.a.uaY.'.Y u9 ab to a,•C •••• Oblened dmalY lmn the MSC wa•Dau. _ _.- ` s Aav n tie Imearia rrOort ea k<lu,.ackm.- - i wro �_� nut ar m A,as r•la hate questions about Ids reap.now Io order FM...a the National •T f r` 'r r� i. -�.+7 •) - ' Flood tsaance Prop.in pima, ease cal the FEIAA Map!Mom Oen • - - t *"X "y - . :t t •,a] • -_ a.... ae.v.arN cx rrl tn]eravJ twre.r..r.tapnam w��Rrf�rv.f?.n.<w open ge inkAr al 1.a'/-FEhUMAP'1.1TT331:282r1 a uses qs FEM-0 •t - - 's r 14 }tt'S T _ y t r s AOII webs.al rebravar lens eaw:uenelan� - aAt^Y. k.`.' - t� 11.••rj _yd _ - • • , +a MAP SCALE 1_ 1000• Do -• ...t r3 e -► t.. • _ , -'}f _ .• - ••• • r wo g-�-_"°E0' �satr - ':: . = y _ _ sew a lw an A. .- .' 7. [ .. � - r 1 ".F t -r ��afgg��Li!! t t r1 A -a q 4rF'Iyl -'--- -- --'--------__--- -. � i3 • t - '•-R t '-7,-, .i Pat' PANEL 1680E 14t"t tM.• 1 _ r • l r N - f • ;;3 ti t ram• ` .. , . fi titilete -1., FIRM c f- ri• :L;.�r,a+-t.• i - �• •Yi -d.a ,r B : a , 2 FLOOD INSURANCE RATE YAP . a - - .'., we-v' �43.;:r-'..".• a,a +r.�.►.�', .!-.ir3'i ,.• . - i ,.:r I PIMA COUNTY, li •r-.-..J %Zee.-,. - 1. � f(�+>� .... -i 'r a' NG/�. '�• - Nit 'y'i''' ARV.ONA •_ .,t� t a•. ()1 - „A t,T` ♦• , I i� . .AND INCORPORATED AREAS iil J d -3 E 3 -_ fr y. r.I)I'I PANEL 4750 + w< *a �t� 1680CF { �� -7. 'yt `i , '4' A• 3:-..,.. • - Y•• '1, Z�* SEE NAP INDEX FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT) - • ailifr "-sf .ser. a•. r� y-•• • • A• _• t :4 GtffiE•X V r•17.- • L- .. a IIl Q 1; f.0,, 7..t.t.a :,..�Bi,i. g r `• rc, al • _ a/ - -.'But.' I taw 4°, tram ma 3S !ra 1\ta. ':..,' ` �_ - -f BICCO D{.ni.C•.ot- F s.. 6 / A ' '✓ I'•sat •a -i I Mt. `. - '..ae. �� bar*-; rr •AIMT t r.r a , �•, •. V j III .u..wrn. "' •an •„u, .. I�r r k- i. 1 + .tea w 8 B�.a p, l_ as,..,s!� ., t-,,.A' j t+t-•-•- a j • +a . Cat _ _-_ /, `-...c ..l a'* -...'7 .••?a•.''` r'. i.. 1��Z ..i'.:ix..Ye•`• , ?r a .• e I�I,t*rZ _ 1 Y. �2 , -y - .}<.l N s tB..� rx . t• :' • Ill rat'; 1i��Pi � y, e t r� t ',.:--tG. [ I J�I! .n toe..than b• • ...OFT •-• _ _ T -st t+a-• 'st _ Y -.• .. �'F•r• _ _ NII J.I ]w ,u.dm.+u,•. Nlre of _ �..• j, ' � J 1'fl�� 6 1 - �N # .� ue.n a , ` -- S J_ 's j 3 a•n t - - Y _ >,"w >, '�... . •[ _ i ii, MAP NUMBER i • •T -•- r. 44�. of`� s-, �•-: :.•i^�Lt Pr • • I Q4 04019C1680L • ��a� fie .'. ♦..., tom..' 11 Zd P - -• h'n15PANELtE-- • '02'-E •03•"E ` 0••"E JOINS PPUEI'.e' p5"E r It �t • MAP REVISED •Ol"E t•.ARNV'4 cNANCE .- " ZONE a. nE.:1 rrtAX a If i JUNE 16,2011 PONTNNEnm r.ULKII 'III I r(IPI Q 1 I! Fednl Fm01,11 Y NiP119 rnNnl L=441e2 404 COMPLIANCE STATEMENT Tucson Koi and Cactus is a development project on 2.8 acres in Section 36,Township 12 South,Range 13 East of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian in Pima County Arizona. I,Jeffrey A. Stanley, am a Registered Professional Civil Engineer in the State of Arizona and am responsible for the preparation of the report for the above-referenced project. I attest to the following statement: This project has been determined to be non jurisdictional pursuant to section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act amendments of 1972, 33 USC 1334. 0,•••••::"ssio0,7 na/ �'� 19263 JEFFREY A. STANLEYf. 49iIONA. S 1,, / / :,fie). .,-••e...". *....,,....,,...,,_.,,:„.,,11: . ,,,1::o7:.:.-' 1..., 4....: 1,4,..,•‘• — CiScr--F " - * • .,..'",..,;':',., 0"- . CN.I S-ii. .-'•''.J:',.''..4',.- . - _,, . . . . ". Ai, • !e'°) ' -:"'''' ''' I " •.„...---- . ... ,-;•„ . , 117.,.. ? 1 0)-r..,-‘1, ,.).-• '- .--',"•1.L_Setili,,..,--- ..,-",t. . (7,,,,,c,-.„ .•.,,,-_,*. .:,• , .4" . ) -• .,',.. -- - ' '::, . -260° ,....'":, !. 11:4, .-.1 1 ', ,,,...':,.2C41,,,,,,'•-;,••:1"!. , . , .......,,,,...--,,,...•-,7.,,,,r-, ,..........,...:.,......-,:,..,•-._ -- . 4, 4Ir, ' , ..4-, I ,:.•••/i iffii• i-.1' • ' .. ,•. i, '•`• k- tet. 9, -•C''' 41•'. -'. ... ! - ••'I &i.,-",, ," ,4 1, 1 ''',-4-'..,K;:••,..•,','•'.;-;•';:"4 ::. ,.i ."-t-': L.„•.• • 4:- ' 4. • -;;) 474i!V; •'• it'1- : -'..' ''N,it^',.7',.-.. ''..,,I, 1,.' V3 .•;,•LiN i ' . j 1 • •:•;;;': ',cf k;;;;;;;;'-zi; 1 ' ,, I' , ••;1?„1" ,..113cp' ,,' ; ';! ;' -''....;' .ik:' ••--' ;;;•• . . ., /; ;- ''';',•;;,, . .04, ;.•••;.1k '' P',.'- ;• i..!",,;;;; ;;. • •;'!';'':'.; ,,, , . ,-;,,k -k•"•• ,,tf ti a. .„ :, ,t I - '. - ' l•'-4,--..11,p,;,- . 1. • •r 4 ,,,,,•,., • ' .110 . - ..., , ,,,:.!-4,:.,,,;4...,,,,.,,.• „A_,1......_i_ M .,, _,.,:";,..7",.., ..,— • ,,,,..',ttt..4. !, i„:., : . '' : ;i t' — •:"./. '..: • '••••;.'''.•-7.'„,-,• :;...7,i'.1 . 4.,...-..,. -,..., • .....„....• . • 1;7 -7:,-,•i. •r•:-::• .11 . • ' . .:„.",..•. ' ,,,,,....7.!ZFeiy. ,,,.:•,:;:,::.'-4-,,i,:... „7„--- . 451----.143,4"..... -It_ :yr.....,.„.,, 4:,0,:`--.....:-..:,.,•;* -.:,,,..., . " i,!t,',...•.:--. ,...„.,.. ,- , w.,-,v7,..7-i,..:;....,••••.,.... 4,.."-;.:L9.1413 ,...,:....E .ve„...-.4,..-.---,..-,, '''I'•-. •' 41 :'-)"-,--1. ""14).. - • • ':'• .-. ,---: • 44.:, .•AK,... ..4- ..t -,... . • •.- 4...•,..,-' '••'•:•: -,,-;.,.:7--'4.%• 4-'..,4, .•., .. .'' 4 7. ,,, " 'T . • . ,!''.:' -;.;•1i.:-••,.('*".i'.o. - :*•, k,., %.....,: ......'.7:.-....:,-... • ,..,--. ....,.- . .•:--,,,.49Aft.'. :,..,-t .-.--1,,., .•....tv•,. ...,•.-. •...•,.•,.,-• ,..,, .:‘ .„ •. . •:',.:.,i•-,14'7"-‘,. , ,. ,-14.4011-• ...,4",,••,,, .'",*ft ',',;••''.•—,-•.),',1".'",'•'•;tei.• -40%.•,47 '#"....,f'-"'"•:',.. . ,'-;i'l 4-'4!,„„••;,.• '4'.,, ••, A -,",... •'- '444t-:st.-;,i'e.-,-.. , 't...11,..:-4. - , .!.--.-••y.. • • - ---,'.. ••,...,.:. . ••.: '1,t- ''- •••%,-4-- ••••;.•;..• .•'4.*-,•••;, f "(bp. '.:•.';. •:'',"V...14 ,• 4.40-..,-.( ...-'' --"'",i,..irl' -'1:••'.'4-,. 4.. ..'.:'-t.,:-.;.:. ..44;-!...-,.,...'.,...,;•*,..•-.•4,: :- • ".. ,•.........-,,,4•,,..41..'.-,.-. 4',..•._ ,,..J. ' . ' ',.$4,•'-„,„,p..04,.:.4-- . .. ....„,...,. ..----,.-„,1H- .• . ...,,,,..,.k-,:::,-:.''..-- •... ......,.., i:',,..,,,4'.•...:;:..,,„.--..,?.;.;.• ";?:•,-„,-4.4, ,-.... .. 1 „e,':Att.' • ....• .-- .,,t, ..' '•.:::::-- . , Tof.) . - c . ', . -,._:-., 4''' -.. ' ''.',....4:''.. '''''....1',....-:#1,44.**''..,,:'::'..,,.- :-;;;;,,,,,; "14'1:'.'.':-',%;;-, L.,,-,..iim...,0...47:::....y..,,- A.- j•S' - ',-.?.-."7- .,,,/.,Ar- ;';'•:;-`.;',;--.. '-....-sA ,.• ..--,•,:•,-. -!;•'..-1'.--,•• -,'.,t1„,(7. .4:•...;•-•••,:.;-*•••„.itt,•-•02..,..:it:•,-„TiFir,,-•,•;!,„..,:..•,..• ,..,•••••_ •i'•'-' ,.-:,•.•..•,-, ,•;,...,••......,......., ,•-, .. ,..-..,.,•:4,w, ,,* , •,....--;•ii,,'„'"1••••?•e4). •:,',-.Q,i) • „...-. .. ;.••••4•.$ •-.-,,-.,‘-.. ,.--,•71•-..,,,,•..•:,•.•,,:•.. .,,-.. . •',••,..!.• -. •,,....:•.•,„-,y.:,.....AT :„..,...4_,„ ,-.,.,...::,,:,:,: ,,.,..:,,, , .,.„ ...., :::, ::.,,z... ..•„ i:.- . ,::;,,, .::::,, ,4::•).*fc.-'•*`4 ' ! ••••',•.,;'-'-','• ;..,."•-•'w .. ,,!'.-•', .•••-•.•....-•7.14.•-• ,..41'' ...*.:,, -1);;5,9 I: ",•,7 . 1,:c,-,c)OIL„: ,kr„,,,,,.,;;7..- ',-,:'-,',,'''-' .-jr4illi . V. •""_'.",•-4''f,' „'",--.4„, ,...• i•••••,1,,•••-•.r.'*4 .''PI'••:'1,.; -,444.C.' ,,1$00 •,.'. ',:.!!'''',4'''':,...:•-',I'' "••...,'''','*r....•,.-. ,,jr ••,.,• ..-... «.' • ..4:.,,ticti.-.-.:-P,•.- ,—,.•••-•','.',,,•' ••:•,,„ -- .400,. .•,-.-',,. . .._ —N •;-'...,..7,'*,,-.••,.,' -i4.. .• .••.-,..•-' .• ' ' 1:,,,•*.•.:• •' ' .t„,,, .-.'•'1,,, ' •'f••• -•4.',"-,‘ 4 0 .,„e ',"• •-••••••'''•10,- ,•', --0 ' • - .,„,,,„ , ,•• • ....),. ..•,,,,• .••,,,••••" .,:). '•-71.)„. •• ' 1 -.•'••::!--6 - -:•\IP'*'4e',,,i,- ':'-_,-,,,,••...;,,i,"'!::.°:. ":4'•:,:it,••-•''''''' --q-.,:'''''1-•'•*••;104:1446'"* .'-,-;:-',... '.'•'.. ,--- • •,,, .. . , i .,„,......,::...77:::,,•).;-.7,tr/•••'pr•---•.•:....,..,...,::,,,:"..ts,- -.41,1,,,.„•,,,,.., .,,i ,..•...,";,-)i.• .,i,:,:--i,5 8.r...,.,-'.4+.: ...,,',1-Lr,'-',....,....i.,•,,,4,,,.,.,46..,, „._....v71',.0. ••• ,,,-,f". -.4, I ',:..,,,`,,,'..:;*1..'44'.,:.‘"H-'''.;ii..". V . ','--';'-10- - ' .,,l'-'''•-- ''...-.•••,:: ,i:',:. •••-•-•:.7 7.-" "':•-•.. .-'• .../..• 7‘.-•.:.'- -'7-•,-,,,, ... -...,..-.•:••,i.-.7 '- •• ,,,* , .•,,...,.'.•. --- ,..'i,..:.-0, , - ,,•:,), .•......... , . ..1,... .-,.--.',-,,,,:•-•,-..:,••.,..,-,..or.:,.,.. .--...':- •,.,-....,.., ..,...,'..‘',....,,.....,.•..-_-,,„H''.•:.-'-.:, .. .. -.--. .%.•- ....:. ..'.'.,•,•.*.... .-;.'.. -.,•.....-,-•,, •'..••.0,,, . ... . ; ,• - -.,- 0•:,_..--,.,,',,,t... ...,... .,, _,,, ,,,-•..1,..„.-,,„,4.:•.I.,..,;,•,.,,. .,- ,•,..., .,.. -...,-..,,. .,,,,,*"-.F''. ., .44.,•.:‘,.-.3,..,•".„;•:,''-'..;-•,.'0,;.; .-',.....,....t..,..t. ..,,;:.:;,.,„,•:... ;';;•-?; ••••••;,;;,,,:;;;-;,'",4,,,, • ..»• L.-'• -.•;,;•-t: '4,4.•.---";•-;';;;4`•-'1•••- ';'; - ,;'4:•••Akt.44 iti,-,•:. ••••-,,-,- --•' : ,.,• •••• •-•:,•••,•-•• . ••.- - •Yi,••-•••• • •-• •,,-, •, • - -- ---- .,, , - ... ; :, 1 -••:•„:„,.. ,,...t,..,),. .. ...,..„....•--4,..••••,,,,,....0,,,:-:.....4.,:„7-,••••„.„.,-7.,..*0: ,„ .-.a-..-.,_. ....,,..,-.-,..,, ......,',• .,••1,-.4 „ .....: •• ..„ —....*4,, ..4,.., )."`.';„ ."..".,•1::.•'ri '. I .:;..4',kk. ' ';k"""..',.kkk''".'--"?' ..4,8ir',c,•401,.''.. :'',•4'1..',. -.''. ;••,.. ,,,t...,,,;,•,•-• ‘,—,. --...-...--;..• .;•,.. •, *40.4iL.4, ••-i,;,,- r • . • - -:..:.:, ,,,; ., :. . .-1' ;:.•,,c4k. -4 ;;,-.-....tt ...„„:„ - .',,,,•. . . '--;•- ,;:.-;..;k;..1;4., ,,,,....*-;i ;'„;, L'7.,;,,- ••. ,,,,e1;.• .... .itel.:.;,";-•=r", .......,,"I •,"'''',.'" IP'''.' 1-r -",, Ck.; ;• k<4;• - At;"-','•li‘t..4 nklit ' f;;-ff;,;-'4 . _. •'..---1.• ''''. ... .-:r•'!4'•••';'A'--;;;-;4;';;;;••,,:k••';".;;;- 4;;;;f--;;.-A,-7 - 7-•: '., -.•..' ''...A:--':'.-• ..•:'•-• -'.„ , .-"-•...•.*, -:;# if.' •'. •••• - ••..,•••,, . . t . - . . . ' '-',kci.:.-' ''''•' ''''',-."'•"..,'",„ .., ... ., •; .#4-t...7', . •,. i ;.--'' '-. . .,,'.; j, . „,.„.,. '`.. 4-',----- ,. ,• ..,,,,,44...:-•.' .,,,.4,4„,_, . . . .r 4 .. HlrM!Y- „ - -, ,-t' `., ,,—....,„, , •"r !"..:+' ' • I 'f'."., .i.• .,•,1".,",... .., .., ,,, _ .....k !„'",-. • ., . it ' "'";„:", • :31. ..•"'''''.", ••• ."..:,..-.. ,„•-•., " ',', , • ,,• $ .-r.'..-- •.rr-'''''''',1;',".-'--:"."'. i ' IINJ!: 1‹,27FC) 1. I 11 To -. , ... ... • '4, t .,., . ., .. .;,.... ...k..,.., 7..„ .,,,„ _:,,,,,.,... • ,.. t . 4 ;,...„ c - • ..."'"F":!;•-..•,.:3 ' .',ott.t.4,-':".%•';;' '; . ,,,, „;, P. .. I --°';•-'••;-•--;';•••••;-L- "'ie-•';'44' ?.,. t ':;;;_la'41 ; 'I. 1 ;la 5\1 , .-i (- P.:'-',.: ;•:;-:',:lif•7' '. I.'-'•";'•''' ; ;1". k. I: Gott I,al? ,,,- ; ';'. ,,,.•:4,, i.:;;„,,;•••:.„;;;'i . -.;,. ..:4.:. -;#,:',..,tiiiiii; •.,,. •-" . • - . .. ;;:Ir...0,'-,..."`-.'• ,,•. ; ON 7,i ,:1,' ,,,, •....1 ' 1.:1:j 1,1 H.:.., ' -; .'",) /•:.' i:, , :•4 1, "T-(0it' ';-.ti,F•14.;;;',' r .it-,,,,,,,,,,•-.,..1.,,,,,,,,,t,„,:: ..--,-, •..,....... . .,... :- . •Ail --••%. ••,- ..., -,•;„..,,,, ;•:"-•• • - ,r4. „, A.,,,..„.,.. ...., .,,.. : - ., ., 7... -I 1 -1;..!,I "..; -,. -,....... ik•-ik •!;44.:: ____:___._.___„_•5''-'";'.4;;-'-•:;';',-Ti; -_____ _. ..... ,•-••1 , . • ---- d' i dr „,..2.* :.::----,-, \ N _/..,/, : /N(0.,,t(b. i ,-." --- -- -_ ------- - ----' / , i i 1 [ f1 ' z ! ' ' I� + , f` 2 I ' t - i ;'1 ' 'I % EROSION ,' ! / I 3 r ; t' ` ioe HAZARD SETBACK t . ' ! t 1 , / 0 _ 100-YR FLOODPLAIN LIMITS '' f' i r ` ! EXISTING 3-8'x4' i ,,� ,,.. � 0 i BOX CULVERT ' A , Q1oo=799 '�'_ ' .„ CFS�� © o , A=166 "�' - 2 \ sco 1 1 ,/ s, t ,.... c.. l'"................r, ' ...690 ? LO � N _. r , ti �..L1J N i 4 J _^f�-4-- II it _ �,f, f / , 1 W 14_ r i ft,. -� ! r 1 4**4 0 a ii ium ir ir , at lb 401...........° I I '•* 2 '` \, ;r—Q� •8 CFS . r 711:-- ' A=0.42 AC B �.,.......,,,,,, f '��� ����+ ��� ♦� �� j ■..��� ,,,,,,,,, .. t . ., , / , , 1 . /! I j` i 01oo=1.1 CFS - _ --- -� `25 . " ` 2 A=o.16 AC 1"=60' ! ' C.I.=1' LEGEND ■■■■■■.. EXISTING WATERSHED BOUNDARY EXISTING CONDITIONS A WATERSHED MAP DESIGNATION _ ._ —1111/— a. /I/ ' FIRST 7/�-- -z i t �' ,_% -- —G45 FLUSH AT 1:, i z ; 259 17. �_ son. A PG . 4h SCUPPER WATER HARVESTING eoo . / L')<--- 0.00411). .44-444545---- ��.��_ & fig,, a 1 --1. _ f ■ fiii I;- I / ))/ /---- ro 1 0 0 t 7(tii.c-_ w r : , /00' 1 i ;‘ illi414111:1:111----;:ii,',t4-lirlt::::IA: / . . 1.0 i/2 ROw0 � 1 1 � 411 1 r' 1 /'+ + 2 1 VP." 11 '- (,ale ,e ,: :i \ . . , Z59s Q 0 .W--� Qi00=798 CFS . 4© o �, ,�, WATER 1 1 A=165.8 AC 1 1 ' ' ' ow HARVESTING • Q N r 100 YR STORM A CL f 1 M N ' m Y1.,J iv N N N +. ..-6 s o 1 gi 1 I1 �r: _. / D Cl_ a) 1 1 1 _ .. > FIRST a II , a 11 n .•, —•• w FLUSH AT >> 1 SCUPPER i w '1 I; LW ljj—jintall*4."-:,.... ••i*Liisinki0.44:-. . Q100=1.8 CFS 1� o T •�---. a r r _ Cis % L • :0 , 1, E . y WATER FIRST rr 6 / * L . — . — . ��"' HARVESTING FLUSH AT �; < ;, / \\ \ � ■ ■■ ; 100—YR STORM SCUPPER r r / l _. ��� �■� -- 4 7,E -- L ■ -zso... Q10 0 3 CFS: — — — —i--- -�;� — __ — .11 _' `\\` �,• ,......, *: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ IS '. ` .. x a a ........a _ . . . a a • a a a ___ -lc Rt Q1DD-1.0 CFS 2 FF�LK HILLS �`''' _ 59+� �\._-- , =a ,; 11,,I/ 4'7 1^.A.k.r.-.--4-rt i 4 A In I I 4 A LEGEND C.1.=1' ■■■■■■■■ DEVELOPED WATER HARVESTING 100—YR STORM WATERSHED BOUNDARY WATER HARVESTING 4 WATERSHED DEVELOPED CONDITIONS 100 YR DESIGNATION \\\\\\\\\\ WATER HARVESTING AREA MAP APPENDIX A HYDROLOGIC DATA OFFSITE WATERSHED MAP HYDROLOGIC SOILS MAP HYDROLOGIC DATA SHEETS FIRST FLUSH VOLUMES TOTAL RUNOFF VOLUMES :_-_--.7_7::::- ; •—t----i--7—,z —7-- .....„, /7, ... ' // I, —7 / ---1'(7-; 7,;77-7---i / ." ' li _, -: ‘/'-‘-- , . C.:.11. ,.......„ (\1-7, -3--- ,..Jc •Q-A.,,,--ccs... :- \ ,----. -j "--'' 1 ``,,,, T .............______,.., / .., / ,_.......,. .„,-.• .--,-,\-------_______,/ i ,.. ,/„.../ ! . . . . ,.... . ,._. -.... -......_ ../.,____, -..... J I Milp , I I \ // ____,_, -1 's - ./'• ",.., ''''' / /', % ' I 1 t .---..,...,---1• \ \ I I '7 ,..„N`. iii.'`.,', / ---7<- '1,) \\,<, .., .. v \,, 1 'i cb / \ \ ---- ..-,A" \ ‘. \ 1 \ ', ; 1 .• . ...., ....... , . ._ .... --. " i 'F-- ,\ ,\.----s ..', ' -1- • , \ 1,,3,...---„>./ j i / ' / . . / / .•,., '. , / Ay I / , I \ '',,, ' \VI .-----‘ 6?\ r .. ,..•\ I . i ,,,...-C , „........_,-, , I \'-c------ i /X''''- I . \ \ / , *' // Zz'r \ \ I :.> ''..cl'.-- \.< if- . )-----'' .,,,,m I Nil v......../' .-..."7 . -..... .44111111. .-------7 I,/ --- r t _...— , • 1 i ._ — ....„.r._"--- _-- ; 1111 1 ..•,_•__• -.-!. . 7 ' f s ' i _____„ . _ . _.,...:.,),N. 1 ..., ,_ , 3, 7 (r.,, AO Id i 1 i - . ' .4.°111111 . A.\- ....' • 1 i.....,_ • .. . -I 'I-----j.\ 01111111111111fty \ i: ---fr i ‘N. --- , ..-- ----____:: 6,1 ts______.---•,,,-( \ , -.' ! i I ---- i ... —____-----1 1 1c4 -I.:\ ...,,,.,I'''''',' I .1 .;•• '14,(,, ----,....„ I 1 I i• r . • , ,..--/ II 1 1 ,,, - L r I,- -„___*.. /1.-----___J' . r--/ / loi si fxos I, . i,--- I ' 1 I 1, '''' ht... ".___ : __. I , 1, 1 t_-----7 1 1 .____l L___.,11 __ ,___ i I I li 400 , IIIII1}. 1111114:41111.° ' . vi --;; I . _ ....-- I_____--...c....„ ,..i.____r_f__----,_\-:----:..--,',... -----C-\1/4_,.\----,c.\--1---j-,c.:-,'</..,,,./:, ,,,\)------.77:1)•:::jr4r--7.31::::-.4:g . \ , , • 1 \ I . , •,--.. ...---..1 ! I t I 1 / / t I _...1.-",' - 7 7"t t t t t....."C \ /:,../.7''\,,,'.:,- ',. /1-.: ::..:--=E-gc-.il i ! '-----•..... NI Sa....\.....1‘......../.......\\_...0 ""......., sr.. r 1, '- 1 i•----- ' -`,.....—.2----1_ 1 .,..,) „....-."; \ --7._\ r •/ • _--,,..,..-_, ----:.-- // /.,-......,, ,---; •--..-i/ . ; . 1 '.."- . Z/? ‘v'1/(k3 /98 CIVS.-.-ii.„11 ik,47j • e..•••• / Q.c2Opf- ,-.• „I .1\i I / .1 V -... 1 _r______..__,,_, 1:::., ,ili___12-__J____I t_11:—...._.J........1....1:1,....:_ii''._11:.......11.411:15''1:1'.1-1-..1,t11‘.r''-'1..-0-7:°:':/9-7-'1E11:71=1:1:1'1- 11-E---:::'Li":31:tr.:::TE-11 'i ' `�--= --= v,'' -�� � - --__.__ Il`_� �_��j_il1�I,(i'i�l ;��..1�Lam,tilt;_;� �-�.� f--��j,I ;' \ -- i , i i t 11_1 l 1?; ',--,L�II.I t_ � � 11�1�' i I _— �_ I I tit 1 � 1�;--�--�. I J f , I l l T�� 1 V �,f J I, 1 i- i i -•--k_'`,—-`_ i_ j `.:I r* r �(7� Iw�1 1i7' r :� — � ; -T' - r �-�.- r"` I I, _4 �'rII1 T7 1-�.. r - r ,l°, '•� i i -1 t, .-� ",T -! , -Ir __`-"`- j f'--_ i _i, .-i , (lTI ui1'L1�— F.,'• j li I 1 `t ) I i , ` t j r---- r t �" • l i i I 1 1:-'-.I -" -------I —t ,•/ I �_-'- r---} I \ _ \`,. \ \,1 \- - -i'' \% IiII - ii- I t ' r - - ; ;----- 1-- —1 ! . I,- , i , •\.;-::::-::-%-zi:::-.:::,...-::,::::::::::::::,..-, , __.----- \.. / _....1 I ty- ,i; x ri--- -::::::::-:::_,.,-,-,v:::",:::felli;i:,:-.;:;:,..7,,'''v-: --I\ - 1� It til' II ,, A t i . ,.� 4. ::e.4...:,..:::.:::::g°:::...K:,.4.-:....../.,,z- „. ,....„., '''.',. ...........„-. '--.:......;;S:—.1.1.:?.::-..-..'4-:',.......1..--rili,..::::1*:;._:*::..,::'... _2.,:\\„--1-7.----41.,Jlif •,/.................b.+,:x........v:?....7.::-:-::1,F::::::::, ' --:;:if:::::::: :::::::::;',.'.'.c.s,_ :•.*:-.::-:',.."':-...;#•::-..-.7''..:: .---" - ' . - - .. ......T.:::::::-..:::.-i 1 ir........ff-.41: :::::-.......x.:.:.:::::: ,...,................{.....--...... ,,\ 1-----1/ , :„...................,...4.21..e: '.y t I ,.+ 1 Y vralS - Kr!• YMYIrr I •_ r ..n^' »YC :::.*:.::ii:::P:!::4::: .. :;.1;:. fit. I ....... "• .................. ............. ........_....._...........«....._........ ..1.'L:'Jf.:1::C.Y.' I :::::..,?,:i.y.....T.:42;::42......7iiit.,zl:._. .:........ - 7.,fe.:1;.n.... _ 1 l _ ...... ...... :-M :::::::,-,....„......,.F.....„::,7.....z.......zga......:,...... ....k.......z.::.:,17,......., . t:.............. ........... . •�v-w�wac: aarlw•a rir7w:y•`rvrr Nil_.......'....._ __...... ....• «..... ....... ""::.r::: i -~4�YwiIMIG•wl.AYWlXS'.lM�•iiRYIYC�::•...-..,. :*i.... ',....,. -.--._.-.._,. .-_.--....»._.,—.. .ate .:-.-- _.... , i ..A, :::......... • . .............. ..,:::':-/..------..,;.*,,,..c.:1-::::;:;.:.E...:,;;21--,4V--.....•-.......*,;t:::2:::::ft,;::::.:.:.,:...:..,::::::::.:-.,;2:2:527,-,-.;,....i..:„ ....`- ........_.. .... ...,........-..... _..... :::-,i • ...._._......s•:•::::::.._:s:•:. ems%.:_.._�.;...��:r�iiiirrriiw.' • ....... ...... ....... ........... eaYww:yiir•». _ i:0. -1 - lT ;:. 4• �' •:.are: 7:, • i _ ........... ...... .. .:::. r .t- ::'mot HYDROLOGIC DATA SHEET FOR PIMA COUNTY FLOOD PEAK PROCEDURE Pima County Regional Flood Control District 010 (OPIWOt r�wy Client: Prepared by: JAS Project Name: _ TUCSON KOI AND CACTUS Date: 11/30/2015 Concentration Point: AT ORACLE ROAD-EXISTING Job#: Watershed Area: 166.0 ac Watershed Type: 50%RURAL 50%SUBURBAN Watercourse Data By Reach Reach No. Height(Hi) Length(Li) Slope(Si) Basin Factor(Nb) 1 180.0 3,000 0.0600 .034 2 182.0 5,000 0.0364 .034 Length of Watercourse(Lc): 8,000 feet Mean Slope: 0.0433 Length to Cen.of Gravity(Lea): 4,000 feet Weighted Basin Fac.: 0.034 Veg.Cover Type(s): Desert Brush Veg.Cover Density: 20 RETURN PERIOD: 100-years Rainfall Depths: NOAA Atlas 14(90%UCL)@ Latitude: 32.3484 Longitude: 110.9746 Duration: 5-min 10-min 15-min 30-min 60-min 2-hr 3-hr 6-hr 12-hr 24-hr Point Values(in) 0.88 1.35 1.67 2.24 2.78 3.10 3.26 3.55 3.85 4.51 Areal Values(in) 0.88 1.35 1.67 2.24 2.78 3.10 3.26 3.55 3.85 4.51 Soils Data Soil Type Percent Curve#(CN) Adj.Curve#(CN*) Runoff Coef.(C) B 50 83. 87.3 0.565 C 50 88. 91.07 0.674 D 0 0.000 Imp. 20 99. 99. 0.958 Weighted Runoff Coef.(Cw): 0.687 Time of Concentration: 13.7 min Rainfall Intensity(i)@ Tc: 6.95 in/hr Runoff Supply Rate(q)@ Tc: 4.78 in/hr PEAK DISCHARGE: 799 cfs PC-Hydro,Ver 5.3.1 HYDROLOGIC DATA SHEET FOR PIMA COUNTY FLOOD PEAK PROCEDURE Pima County Regional Flood Control District #IO (MIN IX Client: Prepared by: JAS Project Name: TUCSON KOI AND CACTUS Date: 11/30/2015 Concentration Point: AT ORACLE ROAD-EXISTING Job#: Watershed Area: 166.0 ac Watershed Type: 50%RURAL 50%SUBURBAN Watercourse Data By Reach Reach No. Height(Hi) Length(Li) Slope(Si) Basin Factor(Nb) 1 180.0 3,000 0.0600 .034 2 182.0 5,000 0.0364 .034 Length of Watercourse(Lc): 8,000 feet Mean Slope: 0.0433 Length to Cen.of Gravity(Lca): 4,000 feet Weighted Basin Fac.: 0.034 Veg.Cover Type(s): Desert Brush Veg.Cover Density: 20 RETURN PERIOD: 10-years Rainfall Depths: NOAA Atlas 14(90%UCL)@ Latitude: 32.3484 Longitude: 110.9746 Duration: 5-min 10-min 15-min 30-min 60-min 2-hr 3-hr 6-hr 12-hr 24-hr Point Values(in) 0.57 0.87 1.08 1.46 1.80 2.02 2.10 2.31 2.56 2.95 Areal Values(in) 0.57 0.87 1.08 1.46 1.80 2.02 2.10 2.31 2.56 2.95 Soils Data Soil Type Percent Curve#(CN) Adj.Curve#(CN*) Runoff Coef.(C) B 50 83. 84.2 0.342 C 50 88. 88.66 0.469 D 0 0.000 Imp. 20 99. 99. 0.936 Weighted Runoff Coef.(Cw): 0.512 Time of Concentration: 20.0 min Rainfall Intensity(i)@ Tc: 3.62 in/hr Runoff Supply Rate(q)@ Tc: 1.85 in/hr PEAK DISCHARGE: 310 cfs PC-Hydro,Ver 5.3.1 HYDROLOGIC DATA SHEET FOR PIMA COUNTY FLOOD PEAK PROCEDURE Pima County Regional Flood Control District tI O (Otti kOt Client: Prepared by: JAS Project Name: TUCSON KOI AND CACTUS Date: 11/30/2015 Concentration Point: AT ORACLE ROAD-EXISTING Job#: Watershed Area: 166.0 ac Watershed Type: 50%RURAL 50%SUBURBAN Watercourse Data By Reach Reach No. Height(Hi) Length(Li) Slope(Sil Basin Factor(Nb) 1 180.0 3,000 0.0600 .034 2 182.0 5,000 0.0364 .034 Length of Watercourse(Lc): _ 8,000 feet Mean Slope: 0.0433 Length to Cen.of Gravity(Lca): 4,000 feet Weighted Basin Fac.: 0.034 Veg.Cover Type(s): Desert Brush Veg.Cover Density: 20 RETURN PERIOD: 2-years Rainfall Depths: NOAA Atlas 14(90%UCL)@ Latitude: 32.3484 Longitude: 110.9746 Duration: 5-min 10-min 15-min 30-min 60-min 2-hr 3-hr 6-hr 12-hr 24-hr Point Values(in) 0.37 0.56 0.69 0.94 1.16 1.32 1.38 1.57 1.77 2.02 Areal Values(in) 0.37 0.56 0.69 0.94 1.16 1.32 1.38 1.57 1.77 2.02 Soils Data Soil Type Percent Curve#(CN) Adj.Curve#(CN*) Runoff Coef.(C) B 50 83. 79.34 0.109 C 50 88. 84.88 0.215 D 0 0.000 Imp. 20 99. 99. 0.903 Weighted Runoff Coef.(Cw): 0.311 Time of Concentration: 32.5 min Rainfall Intensity(i)@ Tc: 1.77 in/hr Runoff Supply Rate(q)@ Tc: 0.55 in/hr PEAK DISCHARGE: 92 cfs PC-Hydro,Ver 5.3.1 HYDROLOGIC DATA SHEET FOR PIMA COUNTY FLOOD PEAK PROCEDURE Pima County Regional Flood Control District 0000(MOROI Client: Prepared by: JAS Project Name: TUCSON KOI AND CACTUS Date: 11-27-15 Concentration Point: EXISTING SITE Job#: Watershed Area: 2.7 ac Watershed Type: NATURAL Watercourse Data By Reach Reach No. Height(Hi) Length(Li) Slope(Si) Basin Factor(Nb) 1 10.0 400 0.0250 .034 Length of Watercourse(Lc): 400 feet Mean Slope: 0.0250 Length to Cen.of Gravity(Lca): 200 feet Weighted Basin Fac.: 0.034 Veg.Cover Type(s): Desert Brush Veg.Cover Density: 20 RETURN PERIOD: 10-years Rainfall Depths: NOAA Atlas 14(90%UCL)@ Latitude: 32.3484 Longitude: 110.9746 Duration: 5-min 10-min 15-min 30-min 60-min 2-hr 3-hr 6-hr 12-hr 24-hr Point Values(in) 0.57 0.87 1.08 1.46 1.80 2.02 2.10 2.31 2.56 2.95 Areal Values(in) 0.57 0.87 1.08 1.46 1.80 2.02 2.10 2.31 2.56 2.95 Soils Data Soil Type Percent Curve#(CN) At.Curve#(CN*) Runoff Coef.(C) B 50 83. 84.2 0.342 C 50 88. 88.66 0.469 D 0 0.000 Imp. 0 99. 99. 0.000 Weighted Runoff Coef.(Cw): 0.405 Time of Concentration: 5.0 min Rainfall Intensity(i)@ Tc: 6.84 in/hr Runoff Supply Rate(q)@ Tc: 2.77 in/hr PEAK DISCHARGE: 7.5 cfs PC-Hydro,Ver 5.3.1 HYDROLOGIC DATA SHEET FOR PIMA COUNTY FLOOD PEAK PROCEDURE Pima County Regional Flood Control District 1000(0141 Client: Prepared by: JAS Project Name: TUCSON KOI AND CACTUS Date: 11-27-15 Concentration Point: EXISTING SITE Job#: Watershed Area: 2.7 ac Watershed Type: NATURAL Watercourse Data By Reach Reach No. Height(Hi) Length(Li) Slope(Sil Basin Factor(Nb) 1 10.0 400 0.0250 .034 Length of Watercourse(Lc): 400 feet Mean Slope: 0.0250 Length to Cen.of Gravity(Lca): 200 _feet Weighted Basin Fac.: 0.034 Veg.Cover Type(s): Desert Brush Veg.Cover Density: 20 RETURN PERIOD: 2-years Rainfall Depths: NOAAAtlas 14(90%UCL)@ Latitude: 32.3484 Longitude: 110.9746 Duration: 5-min 10-min 15-min 30-min 60-min 2-hr 3-hr 6-hr 12-hr 24-hr Point Values(in) 0.37 0.56 0.69 0.94 1.16 1.32 1.38 1.57 1.77 2.02 Areal Values(in) 0.37 0.56 0.69 0.94 1.16 1.32 1.38 1.57 1.77 2.02 Soils Data Soil Type Percent Curve#(CN) Adj.Curve#(CN*) Runoff Coef.(C) B 50 83. 79.34 0.109 C 50 88. 84.88 0.215 D 0 0.000 Imp. 0 99. 99. 0.000 Weighted Runoff Coef.(Cw): 0.162 Time of Concentration: 6.3 min Rainfall Intensity(i)@ Tc: 4.00 in/hr Runoff Supply Rate(c)@ Tc: 0.65 in/hr PEAK DISCHARGE: 1.8 cfs PC-Hydro,Ver 5.3.1 HYDROLOGIC DATA SHEET FOR PIMA COUNTY FLOOD PEAK PROCEDURE Pima County Regional Flood Control District 4900 tcI ,. Client: ,.. Prepared by: JAS Project Name: TUCSON KOI AND CACTUS Date: 11-27-15 Concentration Point: SITE DEVELOPED Job#: Watershed Area: 2.5 ac Watershed Type: NATURAL/COMMERCIAL Watercourse Data By Reach Reach No. Height(Hi) Length(Li) Slope(Si) Basin Factor(Nb) 1 10.0 400 0.0250 .034 Length of Watercourse(Lc): 400 feet Mean Slope: 0.0250 Length to Cen.of Gravity(Lca): 200 feet Weighted Basin Fac.: 0.034 Veg.Cover Type(s): Desert Brush Veg.Cover Density: 20 RETURN PERIOD: 100-years Rainfall Depths: NOAA Atlas 14(90%UCL)@ Latitude: 32.3484 Longitude: 110.9746 Duration: 5-min 10-min 15-min 30-min 60-min 2-hr 3-hr 6-hr 12-hr 24-hr Point Values(in) 0.88 1.35 1.67 2.24 2.78 3.10 3.26 3.55 3.85 4.51 Areal Values(in) 0.88 1.35 1.67 2.24 2.78 3.10 3.26 3.55 3.85 4.51 Soils Data Soil Type Percent Curve#(CN) Adj.Curve#(CN*) Runoff Coef.(C) B 50 83. 87.3 0.565 C 50 88. 91.07 0.674 D 0 0.000 Imp. 22 99. 99. 0.958 Weighted Runoff Coef.(Cw): 0.694 Time of Concentration: 5.0 min Rainfall Intensity(i)@ Tc: 10.56 in/hr Runoff Supply Rate(q)@ Tc: 7.33 in/hr PEAK DISCHARGE: 18 cfs PC-Hydro,Ver 5.3.1 HYDROLOGIC DATA SHEET FOR PIMA COUNTY FLOOD PEAK PROCEDURE Pima County Regional Flood Control District tMOD(OKIROt Client: Prepared by: JAS Project Name: TUCSON KOI AND CACTUS Date: 11-27-15 Concentration Point: SITE DEVELOPED Job#: Watershed Area: 2.5 ac Watershed Type: NATURAL/COMMERCIAL Watercourse Data By Reach Reach No. Height(Hi) Length(Li) Slope(Si) Basin Factor(Nb) 1 10.0 400 0.0250 .034 Length of Watercourse(Lc): 400 feet Mean Slope: 0.0250 Length to Cen.of Gravity(Lca): 200 feet Weighted Basin Fac.: 0.034 _ Veg.Cover Type(s): Desert Brush Veg.Cover Density: 20 RETURN PERIOD: 10-years Rainfall Depths: NOAA Atlas 14(90%UCL)@ Latitude: 32.3484 Longitude: 110.9746 Duration: 5-min 10-min 15-min 30-min 60-min 2-hr 3-hr 6-hr 12-hr 24-hr Point Values(in) 0.57 0.87 1.08 1.46 1.80 2.02 2.10 2.31 2.56 2.95 Areal Values(in) 0.57 0.87 1.08 1.46 1.80 2.02 2.10 2.31 2.56 2.95 Soils Data Soil Type Percent Curve#(CN) Adj.Curve#(CN*) Runoff Coef.(C) B 50 83. 84.2 0.342 C 50 88. 88.66 0.469 D 0 0.000 Imp. 22 99. 99. 0.936 Weighted Runoff Coef.(Cw): 0.522 Time of Concentration: 5.0 min Rainfall Intensity(i)@ Tc: 6.84 in/hr Runoff Supply Rate(q)@ Tc: 3.57 in/hr PEAK DISCHARGE: 9.0 cfs PC-Hydro,Ver 5.3.1 HYDROLOGIC DATA SHEET FOR PIMA COUNTY FLOOD PEAK PROCEDURE Pima County Regional Flood Control District Client: Prepared by: JAS Project Name: TUCSON KOIAND CACTUS Date: 11-27-15 Concentration Point: SITE DEVELOPED Job#: Watershed Area: 2.5 ac Watershed Type: NATURAL/COMMERCIAL Watercourse Data By Reach Reach No. Height(Hi) Length(Li) Slope(Si) Basin Factor(Nb) 1 10.0 400 0.0250 .034 Length of Watercourse(Lc): 400 feet Mean Slope: 0.0250 Length to Cen.of Gravity(Lca): 200 feet Weighted Basin Fac.: 0.034 Veg.Cover Type(s): Desert Brush Veg.Cover Density: 20 RETURN PERIOD: 2-years Rainfall Depths: NOAA Atlas 14(90%UCL)@ Latitude: 32.3484 Longitude: 110.9746 Duration: 5-min 10-min 15-min 30-min 60-min 2-hr 3-hr 6-hr 12-hr 24-hr Point Values(in) 0.37 0.56 0.69 0.94 1.16 1.32 1.38 1.57 1.77 2.02 Areal Values(in) 0.37 0.56 0.69 0.94 1.16 1.32 1.38 1.57 1.77 2.02 Soils Data Soil Type Percent Curve#(CN) Adj.Curve#(CN*) Runoff Coef.(C) B 50 83. 79.34 0.109 C 50 88. 84.88 0.215 D 0 . 0.000 Imp. 22 99. 99. 0.903 Weighted Runoff Coef.(Cw): 0.325 Time of Concentration: 5.0 min Rainfall Intensity(i)@ Tc: 4.44 __in/hr Runoff Supply Rate(q)@ Tc: 1.44 _ in/hr PEAK DISCHARGE: 3.6 cfs PC-Hydro,Ver 5.3.1 HYDROLOGIC DATA SHEET FOR PIMA COUNTY FLOOD PEAK PROCEDURE Pima County Regional Flood Control District t1O00(0tTRat k Client: Prepared by: JAS _ Project Name: TUCSON KOI AND CACTUS Date: 11-19-15 Concentration Point: OFFSITE ENTERING-EXISTING FROM NORTH Job#: Watershed Area: 0.8__ ac Watershed'Type: COMMERCIAL Watercourse Data By Reach Reach No. Height(Hi) Length(Li) Slope(Si) Basin Factor(Nb) 1 2.0 320 0.0063 .020 Length of Watercourse(Lc): 320 feet Mean Slope: 0.0063 Length to Cen.of Gravity(Lca): 160 feet Weighted Basin Fac.: 0.020 Veg.Cover Type(s): Desert Brush Veg.Cover Density: 20 RETURN PERIOD: 100-years Rainfall Depths: NOAA Atlas 14(90%UCL)@ Latitude: 32.3484 Longitude: 110.9746 Duration: 5-min 10-min 15-min 30-min 60-min 2-hr 3-hr 6-hr 12-hr 24-hr Point Values(in) 0.88 1.35 1.67 2.24 2.78 3.10 3.26 3.55 3.85 4.51 Areal Values(in) 0.88 1.35 1.67 2.24 2.78 3.10 3.26 3.55 3.85 4.51 Soils Data Soil Type Percent Curve#(CN) Adj.Curve#(CN*) Runoff Coef.(C) B 50 83. 87.3 0.565 C 50 88. 91.07 0.674 D 0 0.000 Imp. 95 99. 99. 0.958 Weighted Runoff Coef.(Cw): 0.941 Time of Concentration: 5.0 min Rainfall Intensity(i)@ Tc: 10.56 in/hr Runoff Supply Rate(q)@ Tc: 9.93 in/hr PEAK DISCHARGE: 8.0 cfs PC-Hydro,Ver 5.3.1 HYDROLOGIC DATA SHEET FOR PIMA COUNTY FLOOD PEAK PROCEDURE Pima County Regional Flood Control District t10 U)HTf t Client: Prepared by: JAS Project Name: TUCSON KOI AND CACTUS Date: 11-19-15 Concentration Point: EXISTING WATERSHED A Job#: Watershed Area: 0.2 ac Watershed Type: EXISTING SITE Watercourse Data By Reach Reach No. Height(Hi) Length(Li) Slope(Si) Basin Factor(Nb) 1 8.0 320 0.0250 .034 Length of Watercourse(Lc): 320 feet Mean Slope: 0.0250 Length to Cen. of Gravity(Lca): 160 feet Weighted Basin Fac.: 0.034 Veg.Cover Type(s): Desert Brush Veg.Cover Density: 20 RETURN PERIOD: 100-years Rainfall Depths: NOAA Atlas 14(90%UCL)@ Latitude: 32.3484 Longitude: 110.9746 Duration: 5-min 10-min 15-min 30-min 60-min 2-hr 3-hr 6-hr 12-hr 24-hr Point Values(in) 0.88 1.35 1.67 2.24 2.78 3.10 3.26 3.55 3.85 4.51 Areal Values(in) 0.88 1.35 1.67 2.24 2.78 3.10 3.26 3.55 3.85 4.51 Soils Data Soil Type Percent Curve#(CN) Adj.Curve#(CN*) Runoff Coef.(C) B 50 83. 87.3 0.565 C 50 88. 91.07 0.674 D 0 0.000 Imp. 0 99. 99. 0.000 Weighted Runoff Coef.(Cw): 0.619 Time of Concentration: 5.0 min Rainfall Intensity(i)@ Tc: 10.56 in/hr Runoff Supply Rate(q)@ Tc: 6.54 in/hr PEAK DISCHARGE: 1.1 cfs PC-Hydro,Ver 5.3.1 HYDROLOGIC DATA SHEET FOR PIMA COUNTY FLOOD PEAK PROCEDURE Pima County Regional Flood Control District 1€ (ONTROL Client: Prepared by: JAS Project Name: TUCSON KOI AND CACTUS Date: 11-19-15 Concentration Point: EXISTING WATERSHED A Job#: Watershed Area: 0.2 ac Watershed Type: EXISTING SITE Watercourse Data By Reach Reach No. Height(Hi) Length(Li) Slope(Si) Basin Factor(Nb) 1 8.0 320 0.0250 .034 Length of Watercourse(Lc): 320 feet Mean Slope: 0.0250 Length to Cen.of Gravity(Lca): 160 feet Weighted Basin Fac.: 0.034 Veg.Cover Type(s): Desert Brush Veg.Cover Density: 20 RETURN PERIOD: 10-years Rainfall Depths: NOAA Atlas 14(90%UCL)@ Latitude: 32.3484 Longitude: 110.9746 Duration: 5-min 10-min 15-min 30-min 60-min 2-hr 3-hr 6-hr 12-hr 24-hr Point Values(in) 0.57 0.87 1.08 1.46 1.80 2.02 2.10 2.31 2.56 2.95 Areal Values(in) 0.57 0.87 1.08 1.46 1.80 2.02 2.10 2.31 2.56 2.95 Soils Data Soil Type Percent Curve#(CN) Adj.Curve#(CN*) Runoff Coef.(C) B 50 83. 84.2 0.342 C 50 88. 88.66 0.469 D 0 0.000 Imp. 0 99. 99. 0.000 Weighted Runoff Coef.(Cw): 0.405 Time of Concentration: 5.0 min Rainfall Intensity(i)@ Tc: 6.84 - in/hr Runoff Supply Rate(q)@ Tc: 2.77 in/hr PEAK DISCHARGE: 0.4 cfs PC-Hydro,Ver 5.3.1 HYDROLOGIC DATA SHEET FOR PIMA COUNTY FLOOD PEAK PROCEDURE Pima County Regional Flood Control District tE H0 ROl Client: Prepared by: JAS Project Name: TUCSON KOI AND CACTUS Date: 11-19-15 Concentration Point: EXISTING WATERSHED A Job#: Watershed Area: 0.2 ac Watershed Type: EXISTING SITE Watercourse Data By Reach Reach No. Height(Hi) Length(Li) Slope(Sil Basin Factor(Nb) 1 8.0 320 0.0250 .034 Length of Watercourse(Lc): 320 feet Mean Slope: 0.0250 Length to Cen.of Gravity(Lca): 160 feet Weighted Basin Fac.: 0.034 Veg.Cover Type(s): Desert Brush Veg.Cover Density: 20 RETURN PERIOD: 2-years Rainfall Depths: NOAA Atlas 14(90%UCL)@ Latitude: 32.3484 Longitude: 110.9746 Duration: 5-min 10-min 15-min 30-min 60-min 2-hr 3-hr 6-hr 12-hr 24-hr Point Values(in) 0.37 0.56 0.69 0.94 1.16 1.32 1.38 1.57 1.77 2.02 Areal Values(in) 0.37 0.56 0.69 0.94 1.16 1.32 1.38 1.57 1.77 2.02 Soils Data Soil Type Percent Curve#(CN) Adj.Curve#(CN*) Runoff Coef.(C) B 50 83. 79.34 0.109 C 50 88. 84.88 0.215 D 0 0.000 Imp. 0 99. 99. 0.000 Weighted Runoff Coef.(Cw): 0.162 Time of Concentration: 5.3 min Rainfall Intensity(i)@ Tc: 4.30 in/hr Runoff Supply Rate(q)@ Tc: 0.70 in/hr PEAK DISCHARGE: 0.1 cfs PC-Hydro,Ver 5.3.1 HYDROLOGIC DATA SHEET FOR PIMA COUNTY FLOOD PEAK PROCEDURE Pima County Regional Flood Control District HOOD Client: "" Prepared by: JAS Project Name: TUCSON KOI AND CACTUS Date: 11-19-15 Concentration Point: EXISTING WATERSHED B Job#: Watershed Area: 0.4 ac Watershed Type: EXISTING SITE Watercourse Data By Reach Reach No. Height(Hi) Length(Li) Slope(Si) Basin Factor(Nb) 1 9.0 320 0.0281 .034 Length of Watercourse(Lc): 320 feet Mean Slope: 0.0281 Length to Cen.of Gravity(Lca): 160 feet Weighted Basin Fac.: 0.034 Veg.Cover Type(s): Desert Brush Veg.Cover Density: 20 RETURN PERIOD: 100-years Rainfall Depths: NOAA Atlas 14(90%UCL)@ Latitude: 32.3484 Longitude: 110.9746 Duration: 5-min 10-min 15-min 30-min 60-min 2-hr 3-hr 6-hr 12-hr 24-hr Point Values(in) 0.88 1.35 1.67 2.24 2.78 3.10 3.26 3.55 3.85 4.51 Areal Values(in) 0.88 1.35 1.67 2.24 2.78 3.10 3.26 3.55 3.85 4.51 Soils Data Soil Type Percent Curve#(CN) Adj.Curve#(CN*) Runoff Coef.(C) B 50 83. 87.3 0.565 C 50 88. 91.07 0.674 D 0 . 0.000 Imp. 0 99. 99. 0.000 Weighted Runoff Coef.(Cw): 0.619 Time of Concentration: 5.0 min Rainfall Intensity(i)@ Tc: 10.56 in/hr Runoff Supply Rate(q)@ Tc: 6.54 in/hr PEAK DISCHARGE: 2.8 cfs PC-Hydro,Ver 5.3.1 HYDROLOGIC DATA SHEET FOR PIMA COUNTY FLOOD PEAK PROCEDURE Pima County Regional Flood Control District tWOO(NI R L Client: Prepared by: JAS Project Name: TUCSON KOI AND CACTUS Date: 11-19-15 Concentration Point: EXISTING WATERSHED B Job#: Watershed Area: 0.4 ac Watershed Type: EXISTING SITE Watercourse Data By Reach Reach No. Height(Hi) Length(Li) Slope(Si) Basin Factor(Nb) 1 9.0 320 0.0281 .034 Length of Watercourse(Lc): 320 feet Mean Slope: 0.0281 Length to Cen.of Gravity(Lca): 160 feet Weighted Basin Fac.: 0.034 Veg.Cover Type(s): Desert Brush Veg.Cover Density: 20 RETURN PERIOD: 10-years Rainfall Depths: NOAA Atlas 14(90%UCL)@ Latitude: 32.3484 Longitude: 110.9746 Duration: 5-min 10-min 15-min 30-min 60-min 2-hr 3-hr 6-hr 12-hr 24-hr Point Values(in) 0.57 0.87 1.08 1.46 1.80 2.02 2.10 2.31 2.56 2.95 Areal Values(in) 0.57 0.87 1.08 1.46 1.80 2.02 2.10 2.31 2.56 2.95 Soils Data Soil Type Percent Curve#(CN) Adj.Curve#(CN*) Runoff Coef.(C) B 50 83. 84.2 0.342 C 50 88. 88.66 0.469 D 0 0.000 Imp. 0 99. 99. 0.000 Weighted Runoff Coef.(Cw): 0.405 Time of Concentration: 5.0 min Rainfall Intensity(i)@ Tc: 6.84 in/hr Runoff Supply Rate(q)@ Tc: 2.77 _ in/hr PEAK DISCHARGE: 1.2 cfs PC-Hydro,Ver 5.3.1 HYDROLOGIC DATA SHEET FOR PIMA COUNTY FLOOD PEAK PROCEDURE Pima County Regional Flood Control District ft000 aMinft Y Client: Prepared by: JAS Project Name: TUCSON KOI AND CACTUS Date: 11-19-15 Concentration Point: EXISTING WATERSHED B Job#: Watershed Area: 0.4 ac Watershed Type: EXISTING SITE Watercourse Data By Reach Reach No. Height(Hi) Length(Li) Slope(Si) Basin Factor(Nb) 1 9.0 320 0.0281 .034 Length of Watercourse(Lc): 320 feet Mean Slope: 0.0281 Length to Cen.of Gravity(Lca): 160 feet Weighted Basin Fac.: 0.034 Veg.Cover Type(s): Desert Brush Veg.Cover Density: 20 RETURN PERIOD: 2-years Rainfall Depths: NOAA Atlas 14(90%UCL)@ Latitude: 32.3484 Longitude: 110.9746 Duration: 5-min 10-min 15-min 30-min 60-min 2-hr 3-hr 6-hr 12-hr 24-hr Point Values(in) 0.37 0.56 0.69 0.94 1.16 1.32 1.38 1.57 1.77 2.02 Areal Values(in) 0.37 0.56 0.69 0.94 1.16 1.32 1.38 1.57 1.77 2.02 Soils Data Soil Type Percent Curve#(CN) Adj.Curve#(CN*) Runoff Coef.(C) B 50 83. 79.34 0.109 C 50 88. 84.88 0.215 D 0 0.000 Imp. 0 99. 99. 0.000 Weighted Runoff Coef.(Cw): 0.162 Time of Concentration: 5.0 min Rainfall Intensity(i)@ Tc: 4.42 in/hr Runoff Supply Rate(q)@ Tc: 0.72 in/hr PEAK DISCHARGE: 0.3 cfs PC-Hydro,Ver 5.3.1 HYDROLOGIC DATA SHEET FOR PIMA COUNTY FLOOD PEAK PROCEDURE Pima County Regional Flood Control District 4000 WWI '10,0147- Client: Prepared by: JAS Project Name: TUCSON KOI AND CACTUS Date: 11-27-15 Concentration Point: ONSITE-WATERSHED 1 Job#: Watershed Area: 0.2 ac Watershed Type: COMMERCIAL Watercourse Data By Reach Reach No. Height(Hi) Length(Li) Slope(Si) Basin Factor(Nb) 1 1.0 50 0.0200 .020 Length of Watercourse(Lc): 50 feet Mean Slope: 0.0200 Length to Cen. of Gravity(Lca): 1 feet Weighted Basin Fac.: 0.020 Veg.Cover Type(s): Desert Brush _ Veg.Cover Density: 20 RETURN PERIOD: 100-years Rainfall Depths: NOAA Atlas 14(90%UCL)@ Latitude: 32.3484 Longitude: 110.9746 Duration: 5-min 10-min 15-min 30-min 60-min 2-hr 3-hr 6-hr 12-hr 24-hr Point Values(in) 0.88 1.35 1.67 2.24 2.78 3.10 3.26 3.55 3.85 4.51 Areal Values(in) 0.88 1.35 1.67 2.24 2.78 3.10 3.26 3.55 3.85 4.51 Soils Data Soil Type Percent Curve#(CN) Adj.Curve#(CN*) Runoff Coef.(C) B 50 83. 87.3 0.565 C 50 88. 91.07 0.674 D 0 0.000 Imp. 0 99. 99. 0.000 Weighted Runoff Coef.(Cw): 0.619 Time of Concentration: 5.0 min Rainfall Intensity(i)@ Tc: 10.56 in/hr Runoff Supply Rate(q)@ Tc: 6.54 in/hr PEAK DISCHARGE: 1.1 cfs PC-Hydro,Ver 5.3.1 HYDROLOGIC DATA SHEET FOR PIMA COUNTY FLOOD PEAK PROCEDURE Pima County Regional Flood Control District 1 UPS 1*NI RO Client: Prepared by: JAS Project Name: TUCSON KOI AND CACTUS Date: 11-27-15 Concentration Point: ONSITE-WATERSHED 1 Job#: Watershed Area: 0.2 ac Watershed Type: COMMERCIAL Watercourse Data By Reach Reach No. Height(Hi) Length(Li) Slope(Si) Basin Factor(Nb) 1 1.0 50 0.0200 .020 Length of Watercourse(Lc): 50 feet Mean Slope: 0.0200 Length to Cen.of Gravity(Lca): 1 feet Weighted Basin Fac.: 0.020 Veg. Cover Type(s): Desert Brush Veg.Cover Density: 20 RETURN PERIOD: 10-years Rainfall Depths: NOAA Atlas 14(90%UCL)@ Latitude: 32.3484 Longitude: 110.9746 Duration: 5-min 10-min 15-min 30-min 60-min 2-hr 3-hr 6-hr 12-hr 24-hr Point Values(in) 0.57 0.87 1.08 1.46 1.80 2.02 2.10 2.31 2.56 2.95 Areal Values(in) 0.57 0.87 1.08 1.46 1.80 2.02 2.10 2.31 2.56 2.95 Soils Data Soil Type Percent Curve#(CN) Adj.Curve#(CN*) Runoff Coef.(C) B 50 83. 84.2 0.342 C 50 88. 88.66 0.469 D 0 0.000 Imp. 0 99. 99. 0.000 Weighted Runoff Coef.(Cw): 0.405 Time of Concentration: 5.0 min Rainfall Intensity(i)@ Tc: 6.84 in/hr Runoff Supply Rate(q)@ Tc: 2.77 in/hr PEAK DISCHARGE: 0.5 cfs PC-Hydro,Ver 5.3.1 HYDROLOGIC DATA SHEET FOR PIMA COUNTY FLOOD PEAK PROCEDURE Pima County Regional Flood Control District 4000 ONTO Client: Prepared by: JAS Project Name: TUCSON KOI AND CACTUS Date: 11-27-15 Concentration Point: ONSITE-WATERSHED 1 Job#: Watershed Area: 0.2 ac Watershed Type: COMMERCIAL Watercourse Data By Reach Reach No. Height(Hil Length(Li) Slope(Si) Basin Factor(Nb) 1 1.0 50 0.0200 .020 Length of Watercourse(Lc): 50 feet Mean Slope: 0.0200 Length to Cen.of Gravity(Lca): 1 _feet Weighted Basin Fac.: 0.020 Veg.Cover Type(s): Desert Brush _ Veg.Cover Density: 20 RETURN PERIOD: 2-years Rainfall Depths: NOAA Atlas 14(90%UCL)@ Latitude: 32.3484 Longitude: 110.9746 Duration: 5-min 10-min 15-min 30-min 60-min 2-hr 3-hr 6-hr 12-hr 24-hr Point Values(in) 0.37 0.56 0.69 0.94 1.16 1.32 1.38 1.57 1.77 2.02 Areal Values(in) 0.37 0.56 0.69 0.94 1.16 1.32 1.38 1.57 1.77 2.02 Soils Data Soil Type Percent Curve#(CN) Adj.Curve#(CN*) Runoff Coef.(C) B 50 83. 79.34 0.109 C 50 88. 84.88 0.215 D 0 0.000 Imp. 0 99. 99. 0.000 Weighted Runoff Coef.(Cw): 0.162 Time of Concentration: 5.0 min Rainfall Intensity(i)@ Tc: 4.44 in/hr Runoff Supply Rate(q)@ Tc: 0.72 in/hr PEAK DISCHARGE: 0.1 cfs PC-Hydro,Ver 5.3.1 HYDROLOGIC DATA SHEET FOR PIMA COUNTY FLOOD PEAK PROCEDURE Pima County Regional Flood Control District itO00 COW R t Client: Prepared by: JAS Project Name: TUCSON KOI AND CACTUS Date: 11-27-15 Concentration Point: WATERSHED 2 Job#: Watershed Area: 0.2 _ac Watershed Type: NATURAL/COMMERCIAL Watercourse Data By Reach Reach No. Height(Hi) Length(Li) Slope(Si) Basin Factor(Nb) 1 2.0 70 0.0286 .020 Length of Watercourse(Lc): 70 feet Mean Slope: 0.0286 Length to Cen.of Gravity(Lca): 35 feet Weighted Basin Fac.: 0.020 Veg.Cover Type(s): Desert Brush Veg.Cover Density: 20 RETURN PERIOD: 100-years Rainfall Depths: NOAA Atlas 14(90%UCL)@ Latitude: 32.3484 Longitude: 110.9746 Duration: 5-min 10-min 15-min 30-min 60-min 2-hr 3-hr 6-hr 12-hr 24-hr Point Values(in) 0.88 1.35 1.67 2.24 2.78 3.10 3.26 3.55 3.85 4.51 Areal Values(in) 0.88 1.35 1.67 2.24 2.78 3.10 3.26 3.55 3.85 4.51 Soils Data Soil Type Percent Curve#(CN) Adj.Curve#(CN*) Runoff Coef.(C) B 50 83. 87.3 0.565 C 50 88. 91.07 0.674 D 0 0.000 Imp. 60 99. 99. 0.958 Weighted Runoff Coef.(Cw): 0.822 Time of Concentration: 5.0 min Rainfall Intensity(i)@ Tc: 10.56 in/hr Runoff Supply Rate(q)@ Tc: 8.68 in/hr PEAK DISCHARGE: 1.5 cfs PC-Hydro,Ver 5.3.1 HYDROLOGIC DATA SHEET FOR PIMA COUNTY FLOOD PEAK PROCEDURE Pima County Regional Flood Control District 11000 COKTROt Client: Prepared by: JAS Project Name: TUCSON KOI AND CACTUS Date: 11-27-15 Concentration Point: WATERSHED 2 Job#: Watershed Area: 0.2 ac Watershed Type: NATURAL/COMMERCIAL Watercourse Data By Reach Reach No. Height(Hi) Length(Li) Slope(Si) Basin Factor(Nb) 1 2.0 70 0.0286 .020 Length of Watercourse(Lc): 70 feet Mean Slope: 0.0286 Length to Cen.of Gravity(Lca): 35 feet Weighted Basin Fac.: 0.020 Veg.Cover Type(s): Desert Brush Veg.Cover Density: 20 RETURN PERIOD: 10-years Rainfall Depths: NOAA Atlas 14(90%UCL)@ Latitude: 32.3484 Longitude: 110.9746 Duration: 5-min 10-min 15-min 30-min 60-min 2-hr 3-hr 6-hr 12-hr 24-hr Point Values(in) 0.57 0.87 1.08 1.46 1.80 2.02 2.10 2.31 2.56 2.95 Areal Values(in) 0.57 0.87 1.08 1.46 1.80 2.02 2.10 2.31 2.56 2.95 Soils Data Soil Type Percent Curve#(CN) Adj.Curve#(CN*) Runoff Coef.(C) B 50 83. 84.2 0.342 C 50 88. 88.66 0.469 D 0 0.000 Imp. 60 99. 99. 0.936 Weighted Runoff Coef.(Cw): 0.724 Time of Concentration: 5.0 min Rainfall Intensity(i)@ Tc: 6.84 in/hr Runoff Supply Rate(q)@ Tc: 4.95 in/hr PEAK DISCHARGE: 0.9 cfs PC-Hydro,Ver 5.3.1 HYDROLOGIC DATA SHEET FOR PIMA COUNTY FLOOD PEAK PROCEDURE Pima County Regional Flood Control District Ito(Oida Client: _ Prepared by: JAS Project Name: TUCSON KOI AND CACTUS Date: 11-27-15 Concentration Point: WATERSHED 2 Job#: Watershed Area: _ 0.2 ac Watershed Type: NATURAL/COMMERCIAL Watercourse Data By Reach Reach No. Height(Hi) Length(Li) Slope(Si) Basin Factor(Nb) 1 2.0 70 0.0286 .020 Length of Watercourse(Lc): 70 feet Mean Slope: 0.0286 Length to Cen.of Gravity(Lca): 35 feet Weighted Basin Fac.: 0.020 Veg.Cover Type(s): Desert Brush Veg.Cover Density: 20 RETURN PERIOD: 2-years Rainfall Depths: NOAA Atlas 14(90%UCL)@ Latitude: 32.3484 Longitude: 110.9746 Duration: 5-min 10-min 15-min 30-min 60-min 2-hr 3-hr 6-hr 12-hr 24-hr Point Values(in) 0.37 0.56 0.69 0.94 1.16 1.32 1.38 1.57 1.77 2.02 Areal Values(in) 0.37 0.56 0.69 0.94 1.16 1.32 1.38 1.57 1.77 2.02 Soils Data Soil Type Percent Curve#(CN) Adj.Curve#(CN*) Runoff Coef.(C) B 50 83. 79.34 0.109 C 50 88. 84.88 0.215 D 0 0.000 Imp. 60 99. 99. 0.903 Weighted Runoff Coef.(Cw): 0.606 Time of Concentration: 5.0 min Rainfall Intensity(i)@ Tc: 4.44 in/hr Runoff Supply Rate(q)@ Tc: 2.69 in/hr PEAK DISCHARGE: 0.5 cfs PC-Hydro,Ver 5.3.1 HYDROLOGIC DATA SHEET FOR PIMA COUNTY FLOOD PEAK PROCEDURE Pima County Regional Flood Control District WOO(.0td Client: Prepared by: JAS Project Name: TUCSON KOI AND CACTUS Date: 11-27-15 Concentration Point: WATERSHED 3 Job#: Watershed Area: 0.3 ac Watershed Type: NATURAL/COMMERCIAL Watercourse Data By Reach Reach No. Height(Hi) Length(Li) Slope(Si) Basin Factor(Nb) 1 4.0 190 0.0211 .020 Length of Watercourse(Lc): 190 feet Mean Slope: 0.0211 Length to Cen.of Gravity(Lca): 95 feet Weighted Basin Fac.: 0.020 Veg.Cover Type(s): Desert Brush Veg.Cover Density: 20 RETURN PERIOD: 100-years Rainfall Depths: NOAA Atlas 14(90%UCL)@ Latitude: 32.3484 Longitude: 110.9746 Duration: 5-min 10-min 15-min 30-min 60-min 2-hr 3-hr 6-hr 12-hr 24-hr Point Values(in) 0.88 1.35 1.67 2.24 2.78 3.10 3.26 3.55 3.85 4.51 Areal Values(in) 0.88 1.35 1.67 2.24 2.78 3.10 3.26 3.55 3.85 4.51 Soils Data Soil Type Percent Curve#(CN) Adj.Curve#(CN*) Runoff Coef.(C) B 50 83. 87.3 0.565 C 50 88. 91.07 0.674 D 0 0.000 Imp. 100 99. 99. 0.958 Weighted Runoff Coef.(Cw): 0.958 Time of Concentration: 5.0 min Rainfall Intensity(i)@ Tc: 10.56 in/hr Runoff Supply Rate(q)@ Tc: 10.11 in/hr PEAK DISCHARGE: 3.1 cfs PC-Hydro,Ver 5.3.1 HYDROLOGIC DATA SHEET FOR PIMA COUNTY FLOOD PEAK PROCEDURE Pima County Regional Flood Control District It maim Client: Prepared by: JAS Project Name: TUCSON KOI AND CACTUS Date: 11-27-15 Concentration Point: WATERSHED 3 Job#: Watershed Area: 0.3 ac Watershed Type: NATURAL/COMMERCIAL Watercourse Data By Reach Reach No. Height(Hi) Length(Li) Slope(Si) Basin Factor(Nb) 1 4.0 190 0.0211 .020 Length of Watercourse(Lc): 190 feet Mean Slope: 0.0211 Length to Cen.of Gravity(Lca): 95 feet Weighted Basin Fac.: 0.020 Veg.Cover Type(s): Desert Brush Veg.Cover Density: 20 RETURN PERIOD: 10-years Rainfall Depths: NOAAAt1as 14(90%UCL)@ Latitude: 32.3484 Longitude: 110.9746 Duration: 5-min 10-min 15-min 30-min 60-min 2-hr 3-hr 6-hr 12-hr 24-hr Point Values(in) 0.57 0.87 1.08 1.46 1.80 2.02 2.10 2.31 2.56 2.95 Areal Values(in) 0.57 0.87 1.08 1.46 1.80 2.02 2.10 2.31 2.56 2.95 Soils Data Soil Type Percent Curve#(CN) Adj.Curve#(CN*) Runoff Coef.(C) B 50 83. 84.2 0.342 C 50 88. 88.66 0.469 D 0 0.000 Imp. 100 99. 99. 0.936 Weighted Runoff Coef.(Cw): 0_936 Time of Concentration: 5.0 min Rainfall Intensity(i)@ Tc: 6.84 in/hr Runoff Supply Rate(q)@ Tc: 6.40 in/hr PEAK DISCHARGE: 2.0 cfs PC-Hydro,Ver 5.3.1 HYDROLOGIC DATA SHEET FOR PIMA COUNTY FLOOD PEAK PROCEDURE Pima County Regional Flood Control District 'IMO WWI t Client: Prepared by: JAS Project Name: TUCSON KOI AND CACTUS Date: 11-27-15 Concentration Point: WATERSHED 3 Job#: Watershed Area: 0.3 ac Watershed Type: NATURAL/COMMERCIAL Watercourse Data By Reach Reach No. Height(Hi) Length(Li) Slope(Sil Basin Factor(Nb) 1 4.0 190 0.0211 .020 Length of Watercourse(Lc): 190 feet Mean Slope: 0.0211 Length to Cen.of Gravity(Lca): 95 feet Weighted Basin Fac.: 0.020 Veg.Cover Type(s): Desert Brush Veg.Cover Density: 20 RETURN PERIOD: 2-years Rainfall Depths: NOAA Atlas 14(90%UCL)@ Latitude: 32.3484 Longitude: 110.9746 Duration: 5-min 10-min 15-min 30-min 60-min 2-hr 3-hr 6-hr 12-hr 24-hr Point Values(in) 0.37 0.56 0.69 0.94 1.16 1.32 1.38 1.57 1.77 2.02 Areal Values(in) 0.37 0.56 0.69 0.94 1.16 1.32 1.38 1.57 1.77 2.02 Soils Data Soil Type Percent Curve#(CN) Adj.Curve#(CN*) Runoff Coef.(C) B 50 83. 79.34 0.109 C 50 88. 84.88 0.215 D 0 0.000 Imp. 100 99. 99. 0.903 Weighted Runoff Coef.(Cw): 0.903 Time of Concentration: 5.0 min Rainfall Intensity(i)@ Tc: 4.44 in/hr Runoff Supply Rate(q)@ Tc: 4.01 in/hr PEAK DISCHARGE: 1.2 cfs PC-Hydro,Ver 5.3.1 HYDROLOGIC DATA SHEET FOR PIMA COUNTY FLOOD PEAK PROCEDURE Pima County Regional Flood Control District II00►(04110 Client: Prepared by: JAS Project Name: TUCSON KOI AND CACTUS Date: 11-27-15 Concentration Point: WATERSHED 4 Job#: Watershed Area: 0.1 ac Watershed Type: NATURAL/COMMERCIAL Watercourse Data By Reach Reach No. Height(Hi) Length(Li) Slope(Si) Basin Factor(Nb) 1 8.0 300 0.0267 .034 Length of Watercourse(Lc): 300 feet Mean Slope: 0.0267 Length to Cen.of Gravity(Lca): 150 feet Weighted Basin Fac.: 0.034 Veg.Cover 1'pe(s): Desert Brush Veg.Cover Density: 20 RETURN PERIOD: 100-years Rainfall Depths: NOAA Atlas 14(90%UCL)@ Latitude: 32.3484 Longitude: 110.9746 Duration: 5-min 10-min 15-min 30-min 60-min 2-hr 3-hr 6-hr 12-hr 24-hr Point Values(in) 0.88 1.35 1.67 2.24 2.78 3.10 3.26 3.55 3.85 4.51 Areal Values(in) 0.88 1.35 1.67 2.24 2.78 3.10 3.26 3.55 3.85 4.51 Soils Data Soil Type Percent Curve#(CN) Adj.Curve#(CN*) Runoff Coef.(C) B 50 83. 87.3 0.565 C 50 88. 91.07 0.674 D 0 0.000 Imp. 5 99. 99. 0.958 Weighted Runoff Coef(Cw): 0.636 Time of Concentration: 5.0 min Rainfall Intensity(i)@ Tc: 10.56 in/hr Runoff Supply Rate(q)@ Tc: 6.72 in/hr PEAK DISCHARGE: 1.0 cfs PC-Hydro,Ver 5.3.1 HYDROLOGIC DATA SHEET FOR PIMA COUNTY FLOOD PEAK PROCEDURE Pima County Regional Flood Control District 11 (MOM Client: Prepared by: JAS Project Name: TUCSON KOI AND CACTUS Date: 11-27-15 Concentration Point: WATERSHED 4 Job#: Watershed Area: 0.1 ac Watershed Type: NATURAL/COMMERCIAL Watercourse Data By Reach Reach No. Height(Hil Length(Li) Slope(Si). Basin Factor(Nb) 1 8.0 300 0.0267 .034 Length of Watercourse(Lc): _ 300 feet Mean Slope: 0.0267 Length to Cen.of Gravity(Lca): 150 feet Weighted Basin Fac.: 0.034 Veg.Cover Type(s): Desert Brush Veg.Cover Density: 20 RETURN PERIOD: 10-years Rainfall Depths: NOAA Atlas 14(90%UCL)@ Latitude: 32.3484 Longitude: 110.9746 Duration: 5-min 10-min 15-min 30-min 60-min 2-hr 3-hr 6-hr 12-hr 24-hr Point Values(in) 0.57 0.87 1.08 1.46 1.80 2.02 2.10 2.31 2.56 2.95 Areal Values(in) 0.57 0.87 1.08 1.46 1.80 2.02 2.10 2.31 2.56 2.95 Soils Data Soil Type Percent Curve#(CN) Adj.Curve#(CN*) Runoff Coef.(C) B 50 83. 84.2 0.342 C 50 88. 88.66 0.469 D 0 0.000 Imp. 5 99. 99. 0.936 Weighted Runoff Coef.(Cw): 0.432 Time of Concentration: 5.0 min Rainfall Intensity(i)@ Tc: 6.84 in/hr Runoff Supply Rate(y)@ Tc: 2.95 in/hr PEAK DISCHARGE: 0.4 cfs PC-Hydro,Ver 5.3.1 HYDROLOGIC DATA SHEET FOR PIMA COUNTY FLOOD PEAK PROCEDURE Pima County Regional Flood Control District IOW [ ROt Client: _ Prepared by: JAS Project Name: TUCSON KOI AND CACTUS Date: 11-27-15 Concentration Point: WATERSHED 4 Job#: Watershed Area: 0.1 ac Watershed Type: NATURAL/COMMERCIAL Watercourse Data By Reach Reach No. Height(Hil Length(Li) Slope(Si) Basin Factor(Nb) 1 8.0 300 0.0267 .034 Length of Watercourse(Lc): 300 feet Mean Slope: 0.0267 Length to Cen.of Gravity(Lca): 150 feet Weighted Basin Fac.: 0.034 Veg.Cover Type(s): Desert Brush Veg.Cover Density: 20 RETURN PERIOD: 2-years Rainfall Depths: NOAA Atlas 14(90%UCL)@ Latitude: 32.3484 Longitude: 110.9746 Duration: 5-min l0-min 15-min 30-min 60-min 2-hr 3-hr 6-hr 12-hr 24-hr Point Values(in) 0.37 0.56 0.69 0.94 1.16 1.32 1.38 1.57 1.77 2.02 Areal Values(in) 0.37 0.56 0.69 0.94 1.16 1.32 1.38 1.57 1.77 2.02 Soils Data Soil Type Percent Curve#(CN) Adj.Curve#(CN*) Runoff Coef.(C) B 50 83. 79.34 0.109 C 50 88. 84.88 0.215 D 0 0.000 Imp. 5 99. 99. 0.903 Weighted Runoff Coef.(Cw): 0.199 Time of Concentration: 5.0 min Rainfall Intensity(i)@ Tc: 4.44 in/hr Runoff Supply Rate(q)@ Tc: 0.88 in/hr PEAK DISCHARGE: 0.1 cfs PC-Hydro,Ver 5.3.1 HYDROLOGIC DATA SHEET FOR PIMA COUNTY FLOOD PEAK PROCEDURE Pima County Regional Flood Control District 11 UPI Client: Prepared by: JAS Project Name: TUCSON KOI AND CACTUS Date: 11-27-15 Concentration Point: WATERSHED 5 Job#: Watershed Area: 0.0 _ac Watershed Type: NATURAL/COMMERCIAL Watercourse Data By Reach Reach No. Height(Hi) Length(Li) Slope(Si) Basin Factor(Nb) 1 4.0 230 0.0174 .034 Length of Watercourse(Lc): 230 feet Mean Slope: 0.0174 _ Length to Cen.of Gravity(Lea): 115 feet Weighted Basin Fac.: 0.034 Veg.Cover Type(s): Desert Brush Veg.Cover Density: 20 RETURN PERIOD: 100-years Rainfall Depths: NOAA Atlas 14(90%UCL)@ Latitude: 32.3484 Longitude: 110.9746 Duration: 5-min 10-min 15-min 30-min 60-min 2-hr 3-hr 6-hr 12-hr 24-hr Point Values(in) 0.88 1.35 1.67 2.24 2.78 3.10 3.26 3.55 3.85 4.51 Areal Values(in) 0.88 1.35 1.67 2.24 2.78 3.10 3.26 3.55 3.85 4.51 Soils Data Soil Type Percent Curve#(CN) Adj.Curve#(CN*) Runoff Coef.(C) B 50 83. 87.3 0.565 C 50 88. 91.07 0.674 D 0 0.000 Imp. 0 99. 99. 0.000 Weighted Runoff Coef.(Cw): 0.619 Time of Concentration: 5.0 min Rainfall Intensity(i)@ Tc: 10.56 in/hr Runoff Supply Rate(q)@ Tc: 6.54 in/hr PEAK DISCHARGE: 0.3 cfs PC-Hydro,Ver 5.3.1 HYDROLOGIC DATA SHEET FOR PIMA COUNTY FLOOD PEAK PROCEDURE Pima County Regional Flood Control District 1t (OH1RO Client: Prepared by: JAS Project Name: TUCSON KOI AND CACTUS Date: 11-27-15 Concentration Point: WATERSHED 6 Job#: Watershed Area: 0.2 ac Watershed Type: NATURAL/COMMERCIAL Watercourse Data By Reach Reach No. Height(Hi) Length(Li) Slope(Si) Basin Factor(Nb) 1 3.0 160 0.0188 .020 Length of Watercourse(Lc): 160 feet Mean Slope: 0.0188 Length to Cen.of Gravity(Lca): 80 feet Weighted Basin Fac.: 0.020 Veg.Cover Type(s): Desert Brush Veg.Cover Density: 20 RETURN PERIOD: 100-years Rainfall Depths: NOAA Atlas 14(90%UCL)@ Latitude: 32.3484 Longitude: 110.9746 Duration: 5-min 10-min 15-min 30-min 60-min 2-hr 3-hr 6-hr 12-hr 24-hr Point Values(in) 0.88 1.35 1.67 2.24 2.78 3.10 3.26 3.55 3.85 4.51 Areal Values(in) 0.88 1.35 1.67 2.24 2.78 3.10 3.26 3.55 3.85 4.51 Soils Data Soil Type Percent Curve#(CN) Adj.Curve#(CN*) Runoff Coef.(C) B 50 83. 87.3 0.565 C 50 88. 91.07 0.674 D 0 0.000 Imp. 55 99. 99. 0.958 Weighted Runoff Coef.(Cw): 0.805 Time of Concentration: 5.0 min Rainfall Intensity(i)@ Tc: 10.56 in/hr Runoff Supply Rate(q)@ Tc: 8.51 in/hr PEAK DISCHARGE: 1.8 cfs PC-Hydro,Ver 5.3.1 HYDROLOGIC DATA SHEET FOR PIMA COUNTY FLOOD PEAK PROCEDURE Pima County Regional Flood Control District 1LMOt1(MI % Client: Prepared by: JAS Project Name: TUCSON KOI AND CACTUS Date: 11-27-15 Concentration Point: WATERSHED 6 Job#: Watershed Area: 0.2 ac Watershed Type: NATURAL/COMMERCIAL Watercourse Data By Reach Reach No. Height(Hi) Length(Li) Slope(Si) Basin Factor(Nb) 1 3.0 160 0.0188 .020 Length of Watercourse(Lc): 160 feet Mean Slope: 0.0188 Length to Cen.of Gravity(Lca): 80 feet Weighted Basin Fac.: 0.020 Veg.Cover Type(s): Desert Brush Veg.Cover Density: 20 RETURN PERIOD: 10-years Rainfall Depths: NOAA Atlas 14(90%UCL)@ Latitude: 32.3484 Longitude: 110.9746 Duration: 5-min 10-min 15-min 30-min 60-min 2-hr 3-hr 6-hr 12-hr 24-hr Point Values(in) 0.57 0.87 1.08 1.46 1.80 2.02 2.10 2.31 2.56 2.95 Areal Values(in) 0.57 0.87 1.08 1.46 1.80 2.02 2.10 2.31 2.56 2.95 Soils Data Soil Type Percent Curve#(CN) Adj.Curve#(CN*) Runoff Coef.(C) B 50 83. 84.2 0.342 C 50 88. 88.66 0.469 D 0 0.000 Imp. 55 99. 99. 0.936 Weighted Runoff Coef.(Cw): 0.697 Time of Concentration: 5.0 min Rainfall Intensity(i)@ Tc: 6.84 in/hr Runoff Supply Rate(q)@ Tc: 4.77 in/hr PEAK DISCHARGE: 1.0 cfs PC-Hydro,Ver 5.3.1 HYDROLOGIC DATA SHEET FOR PIMA COUNTY FLOOD PEAK PROCEDURE Pima County Regional Flood Control District twoa(Of4T ROt Client: Prepared by: JAS Project Name: TUCSON KOI AND CACTUS Date: 11-27-15 Concentration Point: WATERSHED 6 Job#: Watershed Area: 0.2 ac Watershed Type: NATURAL/COMMERCIAL Watercourse Data By Reach Reach No. Height(Hi) Length(Li) Slope(Si) Basin Factor(Nb) 1 3.0 160 0.0188 .020 Length of Watercourse(Lc): 160 feet Mean Slope: 0.0188 Length to Cen.of Gravity(Lca): 80 feet Weighted Basin Fac.: 0.020 Veg.Cover Type(s): Desert Brush _ Veg.Cover Density: 20 % RETURN PERIOD: 2-years Rainfall Depths: NOAA Atlas 14(90%UCL)@ Latitude: 32.3484 Longitude: 110.9746 Duration: 5-min 10-min 15-min 30-min 60-min 2-hr 3-hr 6-hr 12-hr 24-hr Point Values(in) 0.37 0.56 0.69 0.94 1.16 1.32 1.38 1.57 1.77 2.02 Areal Values(in) 0.37 0.56 0.69 0.94 1.16 1.32 1.38 1.57 1.77 2.02 Soils Data Soil Type Percent Curve#(CN) Adj.Curve#(CN*) Runoff Coef.(C) B 50 83. 79.34 0.109 C 50 88. 84.88 0.215 D 0 0.000 Imp. 55 99. 99. 0.903 Weighted Runoff Coef.(Cw): 0.569 Time of Concentration: 5.0 min Rainfall Intensity(i)@ Tc: 4.44 in/hr Runoff Supply Rate(q)@ Tc: 2.53 in/hr PEAK DISCHARGE: 0.5 cfs PC-Hydro,Ver 5.3.1 FIRST FLUSH VOLUMES WATERSHED FIRST FLUSH PAVEMENT PAVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME PRECIPITATION AREA AREA (AC-FT) (CU.FT.) DEPTH (SF) (ACRES) (INCHES) 1 N/A 2 0.5 3013 0.069 0.0029 126 3 0.5 11264 0.259 0.0108 469 4 0.5 3268 0.075 0.0031 136 5 N/A 6 0.5 3863 0.089 0.0037 161 NOTE: VOLUMES ARE BASED ON PAVEMENT AREAS ONLY RUNOFF VOLUME WATERSHED RETURN RUNOFF 1-HR AREA VOLUME VOLUME PERIOD COEF PRECIPITATION (ACRES) (AC-FT) (CU.FT.) DEPTH (INCHES) 1 2 0.162 1.16 0.167 0.0026 114 2 2 0.606 1.16 0.174 0.0102 444 3 2 0.903 1.16 0.302 0.0264 1148 4 2 0.199 1.16 0.148 0.0028 124 5 2 0.162 1.16 0.044 0.0007 30 6 2 0.569 1.16 0.211 0.0116 506 SITE-EXIST 2 0.162 1.16 2.7 0.0423 1842 SITE- DEV 2 0.325 1.16 2.5 0.0785 3421 1 10 0.405 1.8 0.167 0.0101 442 2 10 0.724 1.8 0.174 0.0189 823 3 10 0.936 1.8 0.302 0.0424 1847 4 10 0.432 1.8 0.148 0.0096 418 5 10 0.405 1.8 0.044 0.0027 116 6 10 0.697 1.8 0.211 0.0221 961 SITE- EXIST 10 0.405 1.8 2.7 0.1640 7145 SITE- DEV 10 0.522 1.8 2.5 0.1958 8527 1 100 0.619 2.78 0.167 0.0239 1043 2 100 0.822 2.78 0.174 0.0331 1443 3 100 0.958 2.78 0.302 0.0670 2920 4 100 0.636 2.78 0.148 0.0218 950 5 100 0.619 2.78 0.044 0.0063 275 6 100 0.805 2.78 0.211 0.0393 1714 SITE - EXIST 100 0.619 2.78 2.7 0.3872 16866 SITE- DEV 100 0.694 2.78 2.5 0.4019 17509 APPENDIX B HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS MANNING'S CROSS-SECTIONS SCOUR CALCULATION SHEET CULVERT DATA SHEET WEIR OPENINGS ROCK CHANNEL SECTIONS PROJ: TUCSON KOI AND CACTUS DETAIL: Manning's Rating for Irregular Section Section: CROSS-SECTION 1 Solution is for Manning's Equation for each section segment as follows: Q=VA= 1.49Rh^2/3SA1/2 A n Calculation of discharge is for an assumed water surface elevation(WSEL)and given slope(SLOPE): Number of Points in Section= 8,00 ASSUMED WSEL= 2591.30 SLOPE= 0.0270 POINT STATION ELEV "n" A WP Rh V Dmax T Dh Froude Q # (FT) (FT) value (sq.ft) (feet) (feet) (ft/sec) (feet) (feet) (feet) # (cfs) 1 0 2592 2 9 2591 0.034 0.41 2.73 0.15 2.02 0.30 2.7 0.15 0.92 0.8 3 19 2590 0.034 8.01 10.05 0.80 6.17 1.30 10.0 0.80 1.22 49.5 4 29 2589 0.034 18.01 10.05 1.79 10.60 2.30 10.0 1.80 1.39 190.9 5 34 2589 0.034 11.51 5.00 2.30 12.52 2.30 5.0 2.30 1.45 144.0 6 51 2590 0.034 30.62 17.03 1.80 10.62 2.30 17.0 1.80 1.39 325.2 7 68 2591 0.034 13.62 17.03 0.80 6.19 1.30 17.0 0.80 1.22 84.3 8 115 2592 0.034 2.13 14.16 0.15 2.03 0.30 14.2 0.15 0.92 4.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,0 0.00 0.00 0.0 TOTAL SECTION VALUES= 84.31 76.05 1.11 9.48 75.9 1.11 1.58 799 Legend: "n"= Manning's roughness coefficient A= flow area WP= wetted perimeter Rh= hydraulic radius V= flow velocity Dmax= maximum flow depth T= topwidth Dh= hydraulic flow depth=A/T Q= discharge NOTES: Segment Q shown is for segment between indicated point and previous point 'Total"Section value for V(velocity)is average for entire section Cross-Section Plot vi1 2592.5 - -_ -------- .�. .. i - _�._i 2592 - _ �_� -_ -__. ,_ m. ____-_______„„443 _„--,..--- Zcf4 3 - - - -- . ... , J 2590.5 --- 1 -- ._ ...—— _ _ _ , .._._ . ... 2 ;---. w. i j w ( a 2590 _ _ _ _ - _.. — — j - -1,___:.:1'.1-.:1,:* _ _ _ — 2589.5 _-- W_:. _ _ .� t * -----. --- - ______ _ ______ ___i .„,_,_ _,_ .. 2588.5 0 40 80 120 160 200 Station(feet) --♦--Cross-Section PROJ: TUCSON KOI AND CACTUS DETAIL: Manning's Rating for Irregular Section Section: SECTION 2 Solution is for Manning's Equation for each section segment as follows: Q=VA= 1.49Rh^2i3SA1/2 A n Calculation of discharge is for an assumed water surface elevation(WSEL)and given slope(SLOPE): Number of Points in Section= 8 00 ASSUMED WSEL= 2588.27 SLOPE= 0,0300 POINT STATION ELEV "n" A WP Rh V Dmax T Dh Froude Q # (FT) (FT) value (sq.ft) (feet) (feet) (ft/sec) (feet) (feet) (feet) # (cfs) 1 0 2589 2 9 2588 0.034 0.33 2.45 0.13 1.99 0.27 2.4 0.14 0.95 0.7 3 19 2587 0.034 7.71 10.05 0.77 6.34 1.27 10.0 0.77 1.27 48.9 4 29 2586 0.034 17.71 10.05 1.76 11.04 2.27 10.0 1.77 1.46 195.6 5 34 2586 0.034 11.35 5.00 2.27 13.08 2.27 5.0 2.27 1.53 148.5 6 51 2587 0.034 30.10 17.03 1.77 11.07 2.27 17.0 1.77 1.47 333.2 7 65 2588 0.034 10.79 14.04 0.77 6.35 1.27 14.0 0.77 1.28 68.6 8 115 2589 0.034 1.83 13.54 0.14 2.00 0.27 13.5 0.14 0.96 3.7 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 TOTAL SECTION VALUES= 79.83 72.16 1.11 10.01 72.0 1.11 1.67 799 Legend: "n"= Manning's roughness coefficient A= flow area WP= wetted perimeter Rh= hydraulic radius V= flow velocity Dmax= maximum flow depth T= topwidth Dh= hydraulic flow depth=AJT Q= discharge NOTES: Segment Q shown is for segment between indicated point and previous point 'Total"Section value for V(velocity)is average for entire section Cross-Section Plot 2589.5 . ____T----27---.L.---- , . , _ ., ., .,.. . ,. El 2589 _ --- ------- _ - - — . �.... 2588 — -- -__ ._ HH1ttIii • i j ..._..... 0............_ t_ _ , , �__.__ _ _. _. ___�_ w_ , 0 2587.5 _- _- . _ �__ __V ,-- _ w 2587 2586 - ------ _ - _ - ___ . -1 L 1 --d 2585.5 0 40 80 120 160 200 Station(feet) H -Section PROJ: TUCSON KOI AND CACTUS DETAIL: Manning's Rating for Irregular Section Section: SECTION 2-WITH ENCROACHMENT Solution is for Manning's Equation for each section segment as follows: Q=VA= 1.49 Rh"2/3 SA1/2 A n Calculation of discharge is for an assumed water surface elevation(WSEL)and given slope(SLOPE): Number of Points in Section= 10.00 ASSUMED WSEL= 2588.34 SLOPE= 0.0300 POINT STATION ELEV "n" A WP Rh V Dmax T Dh Froude Q # (FT) (FT) value (sq.ft) (feet) (feet) (ft/sec) (feet) (feet) (feet) # (cfs) 1 0 2589 2 9 2589 0.034 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 3 9 2588 0.034 0.00 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 4 19 2587 0.034 8.41 10.05 0.84 6.72 1.34 10.0 0.84 1.29 56.5 5 29 2586 0.034 18.41 10.05 1.83 11.33 2.34 10.0 1.84 1.47 208.6 6 34 2586 0.034 11.70 5.00 2.34 13.35 2.34 5.0 2.34 1.54 156.2 7 51 2587 0.034 31.29 17.03 1.84 11.36 2.34 17.0 1.84 1.48 355.4 8 53 2587.15 0.034 2.53 2.01 1.26 8.84 1.34 2.0 1.27 1.38 22.4 9 53 2589 0.034 0.00 1.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 10 115 2589 0.034 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 TOTAL SECTION VALUES= 72.34 45.67 1.58 11.05 44.0 1.64 1.52 799 Legend: "n"= Manning's roughness coefficient A= flow area WP= wetted perimeter Rh= hydraulic radius V= flow velocity Dmax= maximum flow depth T= topwidth Dh= hydraulic flow depth=ATI Q= discharge NOTES: Segment Q shown is for segment between indicated point and previous point "Total"Section value for V(velocity)is average for entire section Cross-Section Plot III W z,- i-v* IN 02)C/ce,4 C int a/r MIM 2589 ,amaria=r111.11111111mmoirmanammiammui , 2588.5 111111111111111111111111KILIIIIII 111111111.11111111111. MIMI al 2588 d • 0 2587.5 1,11111111 II d W 2587 illnallall AIME 1111111111111MMIIMPIMMI 1111111MERIININI AMININNINNININNININNIMIN INNININSIImMINIII 1111111111111=0111111 2586.5 WIIIIII immourammommom NosAlWII Mum =mmiummummisin immumwarmisammummem. amarwmarall1111111111111111111 IMENIAIIINNIINE ME 2586 rtilralianIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIII NM 11111111111111PINIMINMEN 2585.5 0 40 80 120 160 200 Station (feet) i tCross-Section PROJ: TUCSON KOI AND CACTUS DETAIL: Manning's Rating for Irregular Section Section: SECTION 3 Solution is for Manning's Equation for each section segment as follows: Q=VA= 1.49Rh^2/3SA1/2 A n Calculation of discharge is for an assumed water surface elevation(WSEL)and given slope(SLOPE): Number of Points in Section= 8.00 ASSUMED WSEL= 2585.27 SLOPE= 0.0300 POINT STATION ELEV "n" A WP Rh V Dmax T Dh Froude Q # (FT) (FT) value (sq.ft) (feet) Sfeet) (ft/sec) (feet) (feet) (feet) # (cfs) 1 0 2585.5 2 9 2585 0.034 0.66 4.87 0.13 1.99 0.27 4.9 0.14 0.95 1.3 3 19 2584 0.034 7.70 10.05 0.77 6.34 1.27 10.0 0.77 1.27 48.8 4 29 2583 0.034 17.70 10.05 1.76 11.04 2.27 10.0 1.77 1.46 195.4 5 34 2583 0.034 11.35 5.00 2.27 13.08 2.27 5.0 2.27 1.53 148.4 6 51 2584 0.034 30.09 17.03 1.77 11.06 2.27 17.0 1.77 1.47 332.9 7 65 2585 0.034 10.78 14.04 0.77 6.35 1.27 14.0 0.77 1.28 68.5 8 115 2586 0.034 1.82 13.51 0.14 1.99 0.27 13.5 0.14 0.96 3.6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 TOTAL SECTION VALUES= 80.11 74.54 1.07 9.97 74.4 1.08 1.69 799 Legend: "n"= Manning's roughness coefficient A= flow area WP= wetted perimeter Rh= hydraulic radius V= flow velocity Dmax= maximum flow depth T= topwidth Dh= hydraulic flow depth=AIT Q= discharge NOTES: Segment Q shown is for segment between indicated point and previous point 'Total"Section value for V(velocity)is average for entire section Cross-Section Plot 11,3 2586.5 -1- - -t. 2586 , -- - r '''*' ---/- 2585.5 - -- _ , ,_ ---- , 4_- __ _ _ _ . • -**- ...... ,- - 2585 - . ' - 1- . ___„:„_. , _ __ , ,.., .4; . - - -- --- 2584 --f------1---- ------- -------1--- - - -I.-, - - I _ r ..._ , ._,.... ...„..._ ,.......... I ....... i ....— ' 1 „...t.,........__ _..........._ ......._.........____ ., ......... 4, ., -..---,,-.... 4 ....., .....-.......,-...-. , . I i , I , , * .. -* .-.I. , 1 2583 .,_____________ --- -- - - , _ — — ---- . ' _ - 2582.5 . 0 40 80 120 160 200 Station(feet) 1—*--Cross-Sectionl CHANNEL SCOUR COMPUTATION SHEET 2/2/2015 DESCRIPTION: TUCSON KO!AND CACTUS Q100=799 cfs CROSS SECTION 3 BY BRIDGE REF: C.O.T. "STANDARDS MANUAL FOR DRAINAGE DESIGN AND FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT IN TUCSON, ARIZONA" Z-gs=Y(0.0685V^0.8/YA0.4xSA-0.3- 1) Y(ft) > 2.27 V(fps) > 9.97 S(ftift) > 0.03 COMPUTED Z-gs = -0.25 NOT<0.00 USE Z-gs = 0.00 (General scour depth) 1.17 FROUD NUMBER Z-a=0.0137VA2 COMPUTED Z-a= 1.36 NOT TO EXCEED Y/2= 1.14 USE Z-a= 1.14 (Anti-dune trough depth) Z-Is=2.2Y(bp/Y)A0.65*FROUDEA0.43 bp(pier width) = 0 Z-Is= 0.00 (Local scour depth -at obstructions or changes in flow) Z-bs= 0.00 (Bend scour) COMPUTED Z-lft= 1.00 NOT TO EXCEED Y/2= 1.14 USE Z4ft= 1.00 (Low-flow thalweg depth) Z-t= 1.3(Z-gs+Z-a +Z-Is+ Z-bs Z-Ift) (EQUATION 6.3) Z-t= 2.78 (Total design scour) USE: 3.00 TOEDOWN SCOUR.XLS PROJECT: 7("7(5 -) 0",;.. .0-P Cl/41/5 DESIGNER: aisni-4 15.01) co-14)yr ,4,r co,"r 4/ .--. /44-i) DATE: /4-7-1( HYDROLOGIC AND CHANNEL INFORMATION SKETCH FL.151C STATION: at-7,1-tec rP, 4/f-.-.-Scej/ Q = TW . 1 4. .......... ......,.,„. ..1_ TW IV° Q = *-79a AK EL.z-51C17:--2reca-----17: 7,7- 2 TW = EL.gs 70,1T Qi = DESIGN DISCHARGE, SAY Q25 MEAN STREAM VELOCITY . Q2 . CHECK DISCHARGE, SAY Q50CR i MAX. STREAM VELOCITY . • CULVERT HEADWATER COMPUTATION = i-- -.1 DESCRIPTION Q SIZE INLET CONT. OUTLE)" CONTROL HW=H + ho - Bo 0 1-c.) COST COMMENTS ot Lul wo (Entrance HW '' HW ' Ke 7' H. ' dc dc+D ' TW ho ' LS0 ' HW ti-E. gill Type) T , 2 .4. , I 1/1/Y / 44 rick' 05" C.4( '1- /S/13 5“'" 'K.4 ?o / 3/ l' cow, eltomi/ evovit 47- Allit • •, 4 4 A' 4 , -4. • 1 1 ... :.•..4. I 1 SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS: , • WEIR CAPACITY COMPUTATION SHEET DESCRIPTION: TUCSON KOI AND CACTUS SCUPPER WATERSHED 2 RECTANGULAR WEIR EQUATION : Q=C x L x(d+H)^1.5 WEIR COEFFICIENT(C):> 3 LENGTH OF OPENING (L): > 2.0 ft. APPROACH VELOCITY(V): > 0 fps APPROACH VELOCITY HEAD (H): 0.00 SUMMARY TABLE DEPTH (d)ft. Q(weir)cfs > 0.17 0.4 > 0.40 1.5 Q100= 1.5 cfs > 0.50 2.1 > 0.61 2.9 > 0.75 3.9 > 0.80 4.3 > 0.90 5.1 > 1.00 6.0 > 1.10 6.9 WEIR CAPACITY COMPUTATION SHEET DESCRIPTION: TUCSON KOI AND CACTUS WATER HARVESTING AREA 2 OUTLET TRAPEZOIDAL WEIR EQUATION: Q=3.0 x(L x d^1.5+ .8 x z xd^2.5) SIDESLOPE RATIO (H:V) > 1 :1 LENGTH OF BOTTOM (L): > 1 ft. SUMMARY TABLE DEPTH (d)ft. ws elevation Q(W)cfs > 0.00 71.00 0.0 > 0.05 71.05 0.0 > 0.10 71.10 0.1 > 0.20 71.20 0.3 > 0.25 71.25 0.5 > 0.30 71.30 0.6 > 0.35 71.35 0.8 > 0.40 71.40 1.0 > 0.45 71.45 1.2 0.50 71.50 1.5 Q100= 1.5 cfs WEIR-trap.XLS WEIR CAPACITY COMPUTATION SHEET DESCRIPTION: TUCSON KOI AND CACTUS SCUPPER WATERSHED 6 RECTANGULAR WEIR EQUATION : Q=C x L x(d+H)^1.5 WEIR COEFFICIENT(C):> 3 LENGTH OF OPENING (L): > 2.0 ft. APPROACH VELOCITY(V): > 0 fps APPROACH VELOCITY HEAD (H): 0.00 SUMMARY TABLE DEPTH (d)ft. Q(weir)cfs > 0.10 0.2 > 0.20 0.5 > 0.30 1.0 > 0.35 1.2 > 0.40 1.5 > 0.45 1.8 Q100= 1.8cfs > 0.50 2.1 > > IRREGULAR OPEN CHANNEL FLOW CALCULATIONS - MANNING EQUATION JOB#: DESCRIPTION: TUCSON KOI AND CACTUS DATE: 12/14/15 CROSS-SECTION# RIPRAP CHANNEL-WATERSHED 2 INPUT> ELEVATION: 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.50 INPUT> OFFSET: 0.00 0.50 1.50 2.00 (DEPTH) -0.12 0.38 0.38 -0.12 (DELTA OFFSET) 0.50 1.00 0.50 (R) 0.24 0.50 0.76 (DELTA L) 0.12 0.50 0.38 (DELTA D) 0.00 0.38 0.00 (FPL'S) 0.12 0 1.88 (Areal) 0.00 0.19 0.07 (Area2) 0.07 0.19 0.00 (Area sum) 0.07 0.38 0.07 (W P 1) 0.00 0.50 0.54 (WP2) 0.54 0.50 0.00 (WP Sum) 0.54 1.00 0.54 INPUT> Q(CFS): 1.5 INPUT> 'N' FACTOR: 0.0350 WP(FT): 2.07 INPUT> SLOPE(FT/FT): 0.0300 R(h): 0.25 S^1/2: 0.1732 RA2/3: 0.40 INPUT> WS ELEV: 0.38 V(FPS): 2.94 AREA(SQ FT): 0.52 CAPACITY: Q(CFS): 1.5 IRREGULAR OPEN CHANNEL FLOW CALCULATIONS - MANNING EQUATION JOB#: DESCRIPTION: TUCSON KOI AND CACTUS DATE: 12/14/15 CROSS-SECTION# RIPRAP CHANNEL-WATERSHED 3 INPUT> ELEVATION: 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.50 INPUT> OFFSET: 0.00 0.50 2.50 3.00 (DEPTH) -0.02 0.48 0.48 -0.02 (DELTA OFFSET) 0.50 2.00 0.50 (R) 0.04 0.50 0.96 (DELTA L) 0.02 1.00 0.48 (DELTA D) 0.00 0.48 0.00 (FPL'S) 0.02 0 2.98 (Areal) 0.00 0.48 0.12 (Area2) 0.12 0.48 0.00 (Area sum) 0.12 0.96 0.12 (WP1) 0.00 1.00 0.68 (WP2) 0.68 1.00 0.00 (WP Sum) 0.68 2.00 0.68 INPUT> Q (CFS): 3.1 INPUT> 'N'FACTOR: 0.0350 WP(FT): 3.36 INPUT> SLOPE(FT/FT): 0.0150 R(h): 0.35 SA1/2: 0.1225 R"2/3: 0.50 INPUT> WS ELEV: 0.48 V(FPS): 2.60 AREA(SQ FT): 1.19 CAPACITY: Q(CFS): 3.1 Permit No. Development and Infrastructure Services Department Expires Permitting Division Review Fee S I1000 N La Canada Drive, Oro Valley,Arizona 85737•520-229-4815•520-742-1022(Fax) Permit Fee$ TYPE 2 GRADING PERMIT APPLICATION - CONDITIONS Nottec to permit flow,:It is the applicant/owner's responsibility to ensure all private rules and regulations of the subdivision are adhered to. Contact your HOA or property management to determine applicable requirements. Initial Here PROJECT PROJECT LOCATION: -44.4)1 0 is... . oRitC1.....e tz.0 APPLICANT: FA-1-0 f...A96 1441501L CONTACT PERSON: ADDRESS: PO er_lh, 1 5 I 5 2_ CITY: 11A,SCL.) STATE: A Z ZIP CODE: 15)5-4 32, DAY PHONE: ..t-IqC) le 1,00 EMERGENCY PHONE: CONTRACTOR: mzsug.)4. \...10\ite,s LICENSE#: ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE: DAY PHONE: SUPERINTENDENT CELL PHONE: EMERGENCY CONTACT PERSON: EMERGENCY PHONE: Subdivision/Project Name: 11X.e5C1(...) V-6I a66(..41.1) Book l'. Page 1 6 OV Case# Section '. 2. Township I 2,.. Range ( Tax code./Parcel#: 22 lcH4 5/0/ZA .. cubicyards Estimated disturbed area is t'IC:, Acres; Earthwork.. ,0 (Cut), cubic yards(Fill) Project size is 2, (eg> Acres. ,, Is Project Phased? YES /dill Archeological Clearance Letter)4 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan XSoil Report El Notice of Intent (N01) X Description of Permitted Activities: OM) F,&173 IL, eVijr441- tiitt—oiliGieiPAV106//tA6K,C6G- Pli,i Grading statement: A (F5t2- 5 b-3P9e I. Stabilization,erosion and drainage control measures:ITIft eA212A.M,5 - 51 a' RAZ/1,1i G 2. Estimated quantity of earth material to be removed from site: cubic yards. Off-sile disposal location: 3. A desc-iption of the dust cont&o method to be used during grading and until re-vegetation or stabilization has been completed: WtSTS12, *Mai 4. Starting date: ::4711-4FY12. Expected completion date: DCtaki1712 FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of granting this permit,the applicant has read and agrees to observe and comply with the signed permit application and any and all generil permit conditions,all applicable sections of the Oro Valley Town Code,the Oro Valley Standard Plans and Specifications,any relevant County, State or Federal Regulations,and any special conditions imposed by the Planning Administrator,and to complete said work all in accordance with the approved/accepted plan(s)and/or Standard Plans and/or Engineering Directives, The Town of Oro Valley ac'‘! . - esponsibility for the engineerii., for work covered by this permit. The applicant accepts all financial and/or legal responsibilities or oblig. ons which ma esult from the work p' ormed er this permit.The applicant must check for 404 permit compliance with U.S Army Corps of Eqineers. Applicant's Signature' '.:: d iti, . a4..L.hgAk-- Date: 0-3 - /1,5 f Town Employee Signature: Date: Project Description/Narrative: I hereby certify that I have read and examined this application and know the same to be true and correct. I am the owner of the property or the Owner's authorized representative, and if not the owner, I have obtained the owner's permission to perform stated work.All provisions of laws and ordinances governing this type of work will be complied with whether specified herein or not. The approval of this application does not presume to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of any other federal, state or local law for which this project may be subject to. Notice: It is the applicant/owner's responsibility to ensure all private rules and regulations(such as Covenants, Conditions & Restrictions(CC&R's)) of the subdivision and/or commercial center are adhered to. Contact your Home Owners Association or property management to determine applicable requirements. It is also the applicant`s responsibility to coordinate with all outside agencies to secure their acceptance or clearance. ,--Faillure to do so may delay issuance of permits. See attached list of agencies. ram_ c Applicant's Fignatur Print Name Date Important Note: All submittals received after 4:00 p.m. will be processed the next day Submittals will be rejected if: • Not fold.d using Pima County fold&collated; • There a-e missing items on the checklist unless otherwise approved by Planning Division Manager or Town Engineer. • Re-submittals cannot be accepted without a transmittal and a written narrative summary describing the purpose of submittal. 2 TYPE 2 GRADING STANDARD CONDITIONS I. A copy of the approved grading permit,as well as any special conditions,and a set of the approved grading plans shall be kept in an easily accessible location on the site at all times. 2. Any changes to the approved plans shall require the submittal of a revision to the Town of Oro Valley for review and approval prior to the construction of said changes in the field. 3. Erosion control measures shall be implemented and properly maintained to prevent erosion of slopes,and cleared,brushed, grubbec or graded areas. 4. The Contractor shall install stabilization devices when necessary to prevent erosion or sediment transport from the construction site. 5. All exposed graded areas,cut and fill slopes shall be re-vegetated,stabilized,'anckor constructed prior to the expiration of the grading permit. All work shall be done in accordance with applicable regulations,codes and approved plans. 6. The top of a cut slope shall be made not nearer to the site boundary line than one-fifth the vertical height of cut,with a minimum of two feet.The toe of a fill slope shall be made not nearer to the site boundary than one-half the vertical height of the fill,with a minimum of two feet. 7. No grading activity shall be allowed in any floodplain,except as provided in the Town of Oro Valley Floodplain Management Ordinance and authorized by permit from the Town of Oro Valley. 8. Earth and vegetation removed from the site shall be disposed of in an approved location. 9. Noise generated by construction,demolition,excavation or grading according to the following restrictions. a. Concrete.The pouring of concrete and all associated work may be conducted from April 15 through October 15 between the hours of 5:00 a.m.and 7:00 p.m.and from October 16 through April 14 between the hours of 6:00 a.m.and 6:00 p.m.or as authorized pursuant to an Extended Construction Hours Work Permit (ECHWP)issued under Oro Valley Town Code Section 10-1-4. b. All other construction.Within 500 ft.of a residential zone, all other construction may occur between the hours of 6:00 a.m.and 6:00 p.m.Construction sites more than 500 ft.from a residential zone may conduct work between the hours of 5:00 a.m.and 6:00 p.m.construction hours may be extended pursuant to an ECHWP issued under Oro Valley Town Code Section 10-1-4. The distance from a residential zone shall be deter nined by measuring from all property lines of the construction site. 10. No vehi6les or equipment shall encroach onto areas designated to remain in a natural state on the approved final plat, development plan,grading,landscape or native salvage plans. Points of entry to the site during grading shall be only as designated on the approved grading plan. 1 1. During grading and until re-vegetation or stabilization has taken place,dust shall be minimized through the application of approved dust controls in accordance with Section 27.9,2a of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised(OVZCR). 12. Public rights-of-way,sidewalks and other improvements shall be maintained during grading in a neat and clean condition,free of loose so i,construction debris and trash. Any damaged areas shall be restored to original appearance at no cost to the Town of Oro Val ey. Debris,fill material or equipment shall not be stored within a public,right-of-way without the written approval of the Town Engineer. 13. The permit holder shall provide notification twenty-four(24)hours prior to an inspection request,or as specified by the grading permit. 14. The contractor shall call for rough grading,certification of the building pad elevation,and final grading inspections. 15. Notice of Violation,Stop Work Order,and/or Citation may be issued whenever Town of Oro Valley determines that the grading does not comply with Town of Oro Valley approved plans or permit conditions. 16. A Type 2 Grading Permit shall be null and void if the authorized work has not been completed within one year of permit issuance. TYPE 2 GRADING SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. A Right-Of-Way user permit is required for any work within the Town Right-Of-Way. 2. Prior to consideration for Certification of Occupancy(C.of 0.)and/or release of assurances. a. As-B Jilts of the project will need to be stamped by the Engineer of Record along with a letter of substantial completion. b. All surveillance notes will be handed in from the Engineer of Record or his representative. c. If during the course of reviewing the project there are more than 10 punch list items,the Town of Oro Valley will consider the project not to be in substantial completion and a meeting will be held with the Engineer of Record to determine the status of the project and when final assurances may be released. 3. The applicant hereby certifies that he/she understands that the granting of a grading permit does not give him/her the authority to commen e construction of any water improvements or related works.He/She further certifies that he/she understands that construction of any water improvements requires a prior approval to construct issued by the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality,pursuant to Arizona Administrative Code Rule RI 8-4-505,and the satisfaction of any other applicable rules,regulations, laws or ordinances. 4. A field pre-construction meeting shall be scheduled at least five(5)working days prior to the start of any water system construction.Contact Mark Moore,Oro Valley Water Utility,229-5017. 5. By receipt of this permit,the property owner/applicant agrees that Town of Oro Valley designees may enter onto the property in order to make inspections of the property for compliance with Town of Oro Valley codes. 6. Any stockpile on this site shall not exceed six feet in height and shall be located only within the approved limits of grading under this permit. 7. Trash dumpsters must be provided for trash disposal at the construction site.Wire receptacles are not allowed for trash storage. 8. Stormwater pollution prevention measures shall be installed prior to the onset of construction activities and shall be maintained throughout construction as directed by the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan and permitted by ADEQ. 9. A Stormwater Prevention Plan is provided for this site.The plan identifies the minimum measures required during construction. The measures such as construction entrance(s),silt fences,and straw bale areas have been stabilized with permanent erosion control measures. 10. Temporary Stormwater Pollution Prevention measures shall be removed and properly disposed of when the graded areas have been satisfactorily stabilized. 11. As-buil:plans and Engineer and Geotechnical Letter of Certification shall be submitted a minimum of two weeks prior to the expiratian date of the permit and must be accepted by the Town of Oro Valley. 12. In all cases the Type 2 Grading Permit must remain active until the site certification has been accepted by the Town of Oro Valley.Applicant shall reapply or extend permit as necessary. 13. If cultural resources are discovered during development,work shall cease until a qualified archeologist inspects the site and materia s and makes recommendations regarding treatment.If human remains are discovered,the contractor shall coordinate with the Town and the State Museum to contact related tribes or communities who may have ancestral ties to the remains. 14. Monthly reporting is required.Reports shall contain: 1)Engineer's observation reports 2)Material(site)geotechnical reports. NOTE:Signature indicates acknowledgement and acceptance of all standard and special conditions listed on this permit. fir, ignaiu e of Author ed plica t Date • OPO�P�IEY q0 'NO MU Apy", %VNDED'91 Town of Oro Valley Development and Infrastructure Services May 23, 2016 Rhonda Rawson ADC, Inc. PO Box 13152 Tucson, AZ 85732 Daniel Tessone Tucson Koi & Cactus 3320 E. Allen Road Tucson, AZ 85718 Re: OV1501011, Engineering Comments—Final Site Plan (FSP), Final Landscape Plan, Rainwater Harvesting Plan: Tucson Koi and Water Garden (4th Submittal) Dear Rhonda and Daniel, The fourth review of Final Site Plan, Final Landscape Plan and Rainwater Harvesting Plan has been completed and the plans are acceptable. Review of these documents is in accordance with the 2012 International Building Code (IBC), Section 106. The following comments are to verify conformance with all applicable requirements of the IBC, Town of Oro Valley, Pima County, State of Arizona, and Federal codes, regulations, ordinances, and/or laws: If you have any questions, please call me at (520) 229-4824. Sincerely, 114 Josh Potter, P.E. Senior Civil Engineer Oro Valley, it's in our nature. 11000 N. La Canada Drive,Oro Valley,Arizona 85737 www.orovalleyaz.gov I phone:(520)229-4800 I fax:(520)742-1022 7i) , eir Ovi . . 4oa�`.ty R%eo29 o TOWN OF ORO VALLEY , DEVELOPMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES DEPARTMENT : ' ! 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE, ORO VALLEY, AZ. 85737 PHONE: (520) 229-4800 FAX: (520) 742-1022 °UNDED\a� 1.2 c ENERAL APPLICATION FORM Office Use Only OV Case #: . \I\ - 1 Applicatio Type ❑ Major eneral Plan Amendment ❑ Final Plat ❑ Rezonit g/PAD Amendment ❑ Pre-Application U Planner Area Development U Zoning Verification ❑ Condit onal Use Permit LI Sign Criteria ❑ Zonin v Code Amendment ❑ Sign - PAD Exemption ❑ Conce s tual Site Plan U Master Sign Program LI Conce tual Public Art ❑ Communication Facility—Tier I and 2 Minor ❑ Concestual Architecture ❑ Communication Facility—Major X Final Ste Plan ❑ Revised Development Plan U Concestual Landscape Plan ❑ Other Subject P operty Information: c� rI Address Parcel/Tax Code: �,2 ;J i 0l 1 /42-56 10/ 1.A Subdivis on/Commercial Center Name.S'l. -', ,..AK,‘A1 LA, /11-16—Sr:43 I Book/P-ge or Sequence Number: f t� `^» t 5 / p6', I j Lot Number(s) I I pc- 12,A (,rj er"r✓ Legal D:scription: V l_. �T ( �� f Section/ ownship/Range 5(P/ 17.. I Area of Property 6 0,(D Existing and Use: VA(IX Proposed Land Use: C., a '" rit ,i a... --4-k-Cel .11`t Applicant nformation: * If more than one, attach list Applicant* � � ( Name: g' Ol+V / \1� �a Firm: Ct 1 NC Address: PO 1) .J I 3t 5 2 City: I k,k5O J State: Az- Zip: 854'3 Telepho e: If QQ 62 la-, Fax 1-Ccor,.) 3(0 1-4,2 Email: rr Z2 ?3 C2 C.5 i' i1e-;± Property 0 ner(s) if different from Applicant *: p� ,,�y`�t'' Name: I F�t.lt wA 'C /Firm: F.r I,,..A it m' �j a Address: 3 2 0 -Y� f lA.A J v20 City. craDi .) State: l-Zip: 0( Telepho e. Fax: _Email: cr'2'2- '@ ��'�; `J4c J , 0-el (9T -0 cjp L.. c V t L) Consultant -C*16 ) ._ �'a--"" ---------- (Discipline) Name: ts' Or & 5f I t � max " ` J I Firm. " *" _ : 3T cam-•'!Y...1 5— Address: T -� 0 4 1 /()4 i-1,4 L4 __City: 1 6 14.-) State- AZ- Zip: C:230. 7" Telepho e: Lpl 5 - 0 Fax: _Email: Y t Licvn (. .3 eay, 1 5,cf\ck, �t . c • ,07 At* PIMA COUNTY http://www.pima.gov Receipt RHON nA RAWSON Development Services Department Public Works Building 201 N. Stone Ave Receipt Date: 8/4/2015 520-724-9512 Receipt Number: 499145 addressing@pima.gov Record Type: Addressing Location: Invoice# Date Record Number Amount 419181 08-04-2015 P15AD00027 $80.00 Total Due: $80.00 Check: $80.00 Comment: NEW ADDRESS ISSUED 7810 N ORACLE RD FOR APN 225-51-012A Print DatE:8/4/2015 Cashier: ROBIN FREIMAN Page 1 of 1 V Laws, David From: Turner, Justin Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 11:07 AM To: Laws, David; Potter, Josh Subject: Rancho Vistoso 10-A detention waiver request Josh, The letter from Eric Beam from The WLB Group dated May 3, 2016 requested confirmation that stormwater detention requirements for RV 10-A can be waived because the existing detention basin, located 0.3 miles downstream, had already been designed to accommodate future runoff from the subject parcel. If this is true and can be confirmed, it is my opinion that the Town should allow the requested waiver. My comments follow. 1. Section 1.0 of the 2010 TOV Drainage Criteria Manual says it is mandatory to use these design criteria for all projects submitted after February 1, 2010. In addition, the waiver-request letter referenced a 2003 drainage report as the technical basis for the request. An examination of this referenced report revealed that it contained very little technical information other than a computational summary and schematic diagram of the HEC-HMS model of the watershed upstream of Concentration Point#9 at Moore Road. To be in compliance with the mandatory use requirement, it is recommended that the Drainage Report for RV Parcel 10-A include an updated hydrology model of the watershed, as well as a description of the important input parameters used. This report should also compare the new results with those given in the original 2003 report, as well as in the 2007 Town-wide Drainage Study. 2. Section 11.4.5 of the 2010 TOV Drainage Criteria Manual says Detention basins are to be treated as an offline storage facility and that they shall not be located in washes. Similarly, Section 4.2 of the 2014 Pima County Design Standards for Stormwater Detention says on-line detention within regulatory floodplains is prohibited. One of the primary reasons for disallowing on-line stormwater basins is that they trap all incoming sediment causing aggradation upstream of the outlet and degradation downstream. 3. This stormwater basin was constructed in 2005, and it appears that these unintended consequences have already occurred because we see that the three low-flow outlet culverts are nearly buried beneath sediment. Furthermore, we also see that the downstream channel has also degraded by about three feet causing the existing rock-lined scour basin to have failed, as well as exposing a water line and telecommunication cables located within the public right-of-way. This channel degradation also appears to be continuing downstream onto private property. If this basin is to be used for Parcel 10-A then is must be fully operational, including demonstration that annual inspections have been regularly made. 4. The pre-formed rock-lined scour basin located south of Moore Road has failed, and it appears to be the direct consequence of continued operation of the stormwater basin. Demonstrate that the basin did not cause this failure, otherwise design and construct a replacement scour hole within the public right-of-way. 5. Demonstrate that the increased flows from Parcel 1-A will not adversely affect the existing grouted-rock-riprap bank protection along RV Neighborhood 10, as well as the nearby Oro Valley Water Treatment Plant. In other words, confirm that intervening properties were designed to accommodate these future flows from Parcel 10-A. 6. The channel downstream from Moore Road is actively degrading, and it is likely that this degradation will continue for the foreseeable future. In addition, the rate and volume of sediment transport are proportional to the discharge rate in the sandbed channel. By waiving the detention requirement may exacerbate the sedimentation/degradation problems downstream. Demonstrate that waiving detention will not increase these problems, otherwise recommend engineering methods for reducing this impact. That's it for now Let me know your thoughts on requiring some sort of repair to the basin and rock-lined basin in the public right-of-way 1 lir . Justin. Justin Turner, P.E. Stormwater Civil Engineer Development& Infrastructure Services Department Town of Oro Valley 11000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley,AZ 85737 520-229-4818 (Office) 2 1 T[ir Engineering • Planning Surveying • Urban Design r � May 3, 2016 Landscape Architecture David Laws, P.E. Town of Oro Valley 11000 N La Canada Drive Oro Valley, AZ 85737 Re: Request for Detention Waiver;Parcel A, Neighborhood 10, Rancho Vistoso Oro Valley No. OV1214-35 WLB No. 185050-ZA01-0400 Dear Mr. Laws, This letter has been prepared in support of the proposed detention plan for Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 10 Parcel A. This project site in this report contains a gross area of 20.4 acres and currently discharges storm water runoff through natural channels and sheet flow directly into to the Lomas De Oro Wash. The plan proposes discharging the post-developed storm water runoff from portions of Neighborhood 10, Parcel A through the proposed future development and directly into the natural channel and drainageways of the Lomas De Oro Wash flowing through the eastern portion of the site.The Lomas De Oro Wash drainageway will direct the flows south to a regional detention basin located immediately upstream of Moore Road approximately 0.3 miles downstream. This project is located in The Town of Oro Valley and is required to comply with any drainage requirements set forth by the Town. The Town has declared the entire town as being within a Critical Basin. This decision requires the discharges leaving the developed site to be reduced to, or below, the pre-developed levels. However,this site is eligible for a variance/detention waiver on the basis that"the project is directly adjacent to a public wash and the outflow introduced by the development can be demonstrated not to affect the peak flow rate within said wash". In addition, the site has been included in the analysis"Revised Drainage Report for Pebble Creek Drive(STA 10+00 to 88+00)Moore Road(STA 52+53 to 73+74) Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 10" prepared by The WLB Group Inc. dated August 15, 2002, revised and approved July 8, 2003. The reports states that the retention/detention requirements for this site and Parcels 10A, V, X, & Y have been provided through the regional detention basin located immediately upstream of Moore Road. Engineering • Planning • Surveying • Urban Design • Landscape Architecture Offices located in Tucson, Phoenix, Flagstaff, Las Vegas • E-mail: tucson@wlbgroup.com 4444 East Broadway • Tucson, Arizona 85711 • (520) 881-7480 • FAX (520) 881-7492 The existing detention basin at Moore Road is designed to decrease the post-developed nrr� e peak discharges to a minimum of 5 percent below the pre-developed levels by using a L a combined orifice and multi-stage weir outflow structure. This outflow structure has been &*L Installed into a proposed levee, constructed immediately upstream of Moore Road. The contributing watershed is approximately 1.7 square miles in size and encompasses Parcel A, Ranch Vistoso Neighborhood 10 entirely. The detention basin decreases the 2-year post- developed flow from 377 cfs to 335 cfs; the 10-year flow from 826 cfs to 741 cfs and the 100-yearflow from 1431 cfs to 1257 cfs. The routed flows discharge through a 2 cell, 12 foot X 6 foot concrete arch structure underneath Moore Road. The 100-year storage depth of the detention basin has been estimated to be 8.4 feet and the 100-year headwater depth for the Moore Road culvert has been determined to be 7.3 feet. As a result of the available retention/detention credit within this basin, the detention requirements from this site have been provided in this regional basin. Furthermore, the design discharges for structures and floodplains downstream of the site have been evaluated for future densities and development. A waiver for detention is requested for this project for any storm event based on its immediate proximity to Lomas De Oro Wash and the regional detention basin. If you should have any further questions or comments, please contactCorey Thompson or me at 881-7480. Sincerely, in The WLB Group, Inc. • 1 1 I,, ' `' Iona/ ti `' 22217 "c? Erik Beam, CFM ct COREY Hydrologic/Hydraulic Designer THOMPSON F.l ojQ./r3 J1(1# Sned k��res 09130\\6 . , oidb„. , , '!A, , ,..4r , ;,,,,,,,AL, ; •„,„,,,..,..,mt. a.„,,,,,: . . , , .,,,,,-.: , . _ „ • . ,,,,,„, , , , „,, , , ,, N. •" '. � t{a. _ 1 so- 11 e. " a„£ ,4„ , 1,,,',2,'''','„A''..,',:',I'' ,,.,,,, . ,- #k: ,,,,, !!'ii 't''.,,t''..'',,-,4!,,-i'''',. '7',,,'"r"'s .•• ''' '0*.:'--'. , re$.11•011t..„.: • ' „. . kPk. .,, gam, iiiiio ... • •. a „h• �:,, , ' 4 •< FZ. a ter,-` :.z .q ,,, a,h`t ,!:",H , fir 'AV r "'R' •iek,.QX'. z ' A� <y,;Y iAGti' ,' ,ate .. 'S ,.$," ,, '�'•• r. • 'C \,..:'� .w� `t"•k' M� ,,N "L�'• +11C.. .. „ < �y i••' ,�'f�, „ i .ft".. 4 w T `�k{�: f d. :yl{.. $xC ` ^'�'b. :,s, ' • 6 w Y 3Y % y '�r`� "' , a d_ ," , <a N •`�"+4 ,>Ct ., 'F ,',",r ` 'Jt` t'vl,J„ M iNVI „`+d� �^tiY-'•<:'4=;,'' c+:`x, ya.2�e' .•: .. _ 2frP`. '"�Ss k yy di•y'/,.. • �' v - ', P.^ ^ +. . , .. 'r. r G '�' "e. °3 ,k° t. e 'w'o-w,p $H`ii ^1,ti'i P'',,, -, .,xa t �2 �, ,^ k;4:� .T, 'gym ,! Y; ?. ,,,,,,,,,,,,,:. `1: :d "� Ybx .j,t.`A ,.'g<, .�,T� „ ''h �,;t;; ".' `,•3•a N .,9,. ,y Itp,,.`. sz'.01, .fin 'tip tt , , , Y, !„ 6r',4',.,irk'Ali „ T i�, � • qy✓��`,'„:'N'. . ', Af' y,. n.S." >p p 'Y.-. N ' to a, �'x� •' $'•s b"'" :�'•,hrz,.;g „r:.' ..�y, ' a. " Y 3o-, g .'9 'A : r giOt '4,F''' :'7 � ;" < .:z : - .,s?`' `.� tsdt <M •`$s.;,.' °^<, ''.,,,..#, i.rrx,: O'.•` its _ "# k, ,<. u 't ''�.' .4 ro ;:,M'"" „ta, 't7 �?a, ''' �^`,a, • .z • _,.'. .::e s"„w "'3r! .�k. `�:4.` ut'. �.mr ;, ';'.,,,3,. `r. ,. ... fie. ,fY� vy�' �. .:�. St ;.?z< ? � d., - '•fix - , K ry-. • ''yn:, ? �" <,y 'si u, k s 1`'m`, .ems [ x'�tl% ,LA„..!,.....',::,4, �'s' ';.Js t •� -- 'r�<. ''its �+ ^x„ysr • ,, a �f. i., ,t '.too „..{' . '.fir. - two .. "x• .;r,.,,,�` is *, .;''''.'%Iiii4i1441/41i1-,‘',:::.0 , v N,, • '' ''Y'' • y f .:: .av4+. rpe .({ i • ^ .!r{ ^L,..` 5,,f'R.` "^`Tn yy� '' 'Rn t'f`,:`, , n'y,", , ,,,:tli"'' h .� ,. ',sa :.."m`.r ,j""_'$F` fi I4 „6 •'.%a. ., • ,5�K$k `4 • q'4 i f • g' '. f �; ilit S,$' .tt,.it xa11. •�• rc,>,5 a'' b, e < ( '�.• ..p,; `.•: <7r, $ • • A '^,&xbfn'P4;?`•M €iS 4.2 - ^ ^ • « ..v4. �, .,6', ,� �.lt, „ N rAsk .. ` : Iifr7'4$,,, g; S> • • Q.. • ", '� •w` ir` :H", " ,, . d`: , ,, ' .pAprt li^'�'' .; . ;• ^ ,',:„`S:""s •yerE' „"kRf•A xr' • �,.f •r,,F .. �;µ '� ' ^` ', ^ ^ +R ,k • ±�m`".a;,.,•'^` 4y g�1,p ',f';:.:.,q .:;^ _ .;y,�„ ,,. •, dry" :• - ,,ft� '�f'''t _ x ^ ,r N.,, 4. ,. '_•,.. ,' Y ... .. 'ifr— _ �.„ •.. ax lei ' .. y ": p,, +" t ,r�.- is �l":� Kx ,� .. Mn `?; , , i +r✓» :.,, ...4te '3d.`i' - 'Hl Yt!=• i • ,. •' N : #o 7dy, IA "ill.:',,,,:t4 q; t'' x .a, W';4, ,Ham ' • . :,,,,,' • , . ,'S;`„ : �rc'`` _ - rn. `:'`.i.,." e:e s'° '?!t .x:4; r xt:;" .s ''"' "` - .,...«4. •, .. • K.p '' `ery iii,,, "' ,- 4 'b¢ IpiA' ^�w¢' ; r. .‘,. '•'''' '' ''''' '''''.V. 1 ` f:,xT"n",„, dat ,9# 1;",,i.:%^'€ %„a"s;x , ;it •; Y ..., ya ,r^;'' ' iiipii .. fl,. i. ; • :'''''':. `n,to r w' •. • '{•. - `.4'o g` 'Sa'>•� #'. .:w • i N it,,,,,,,!-Jirr':'-ii, '? #' "r "N w it " "y t ',,. fr � ' " '.n �`' :% .k' ,w'" ,,�. f - `, •a ..:a;-�..- ,r'y"• 'Y Wit. ;: :. ,�" tn, @�'r.�• t0iHri SA 'i'y �' t • • • :.- x it :€ , • ��. _",' •• <, . .w• p� '.bra: "' , — _ i� • 'fin= tit; .• ', ,> .,'•` ,. ;k `:,,, ,, ".,t ,.�.,, r_ , x ,,,g, .,A. +.• ffi„v."v ,-,. „�,�n`t'a�_ SU` `$'>!`..' �'. a,�"' .;Y+..� .�'„ ,•;.: .,"-:':::::,. lit%',:'::-. .. • �F. 7 s;F .;�`fi�t'. .. t,�i�'4,'4��TtS,,t'`�'� '�st`T-"• , • x M ,. s4,' � S�,, �5� Z� h♦ Y"x R" 43 rs'• �r< 11,1 '77 _ : • • kF s. f,, . C,t rf.,,,',,- „ ,•,, 1I ,,,rn t a ar,: :,x• ,,•' 'aisa s,,,...`ti? ',F. -- '11111111111911,17 - - •�">, .,, " .,,,,,::,..: .„_.•,...„ „, . , ,,,......., =z.- ,, , ri ,•,, ,,,,, ,�.,,'1'.e4„, - , ,y., ��N "^q,$?..<�.,,,,,, •' ;{...- :•., •}' .. -. 'a„t ,. s,,,' (n .. S ,',%`�a't'''` •' ff��, • .,d:.r ai ,. ,.r „.. �.. . ^ __ " .9'. >wNr" .�� ' .. - 'Y'+`,°-"xr;s! -s,. - y� ,`Y� • - 'rta, „ „;'�,. in, -lr1 .'. .'et, "'r�y' *i:xs:@,^ ' Y,. „ ,. :3x " �xl. 1' - ,a`i ems" _.t,� a .; , .., M, s ,t„. ,.,..�,-h."^:�,...,rc,6.: •-wi:wi':js,`,h,,,,,,�,,,as'<;x,«:,;„;,,,,,s.„;x,,, `k ' Mx' ,• Y u64y ,i�`5,'. 'S•'�«a .ri.a 4."Y.y ax` ,ram",F` Pw t, w' ., ,,;a Mx, is d .="aR•' 1}, • ,YiA^P/ ,5, or,,.,,^.^„,.,«., w St v 04� �y��' rl .. _�§: , , : s4„,,,,. ,,=1-,,t,,• •'* ' ,,",,t,i ,*: 'z 4,` , ,„'rs^','.:^ •ii, :ik's;3.< °'.'r,,<s''a£'.-' y `� �� did^� : ' s .:, N:^ r. •t`>r,f = f5r+i� �i't(e E' rn,"' :,w;. w, .*4:Aril,-'-:";„•',Yillis•:'$,•04,,,X.-,,T,44,1•:,'.r;,,— 77. i, ���rg re yp,xC sz,x a t, .f::4 :;'-' 9Y1: ,+ hC x `"� ,,-,-,4";44,;,''r f" .ys,' 'r5 'Y�'y'' H;,,', '�` w .?Ft ..,s�:,. ";,i„ :z .R" • , '#4: , 'z', • "•:#^?"''" >. ±i' ..ot.SIP- • row:'.,;z, ., -Y ,py:t ti. Y` `=A �j��t ``Rt c';R`„ "1'J,'. . - " y r • t, -'"�""*V`' Jokli "t" ,f y'r•1i ;}� , ,"'_^ .Fs'• '•w„t,:i G r "• , 'S '.,£,'.. .,s'.'±.`S}`I,.,^ ` �,. ' `~"1;"'`'^'Ys:'',+e,v,25 r£',EE,i •+3 ,,. • i Nt i - ,. yy� ,' ,,• •zx,... „n Kam`•,ti,\F .. <.,, • a:' % x''n "S.t<.C^,,?^0.ts,,xs :{e,,,;;'x4"•,F ;s :` •r_` :..?":. �} _''',„:-- „tii,V.,',,,:f-:, `,' ,10-'-' . I `E. 'iiii .:i,: -1% „ . „., Far — mr • -, .,:• , i1.110.,:,41 1147. -,41:t;'''',4„:.',,'''4' . . a t, . y, • fsf '_'i' y:4 -a '<"., 'ems 1..7_ " • ^k:'� ,. yHs ,'1,F i. Yq- '@ ,0,,,, o ,. „ - _ :t.h , '4 , , '„^r - • 'i `• k'• '"�,,Y,"a`9,~ _ - - tUT'x,�x; • a '' 400; . ,. .„„. ,m Pe Rx sy �` =r• '1't ..^+Y3 " � sk' � , t C e .pn a< 2y' .••, sd. , . , Fitzc),v15 (..) 1 () 11 ,, i' 1 AGAVE PARRYI V. TRUNCATA MOUNTAIN Sr. ES ARTICHOKE AGAVE y°'FSAtE%to The dense symmetrical form and AT A GLANCE SUMMARY wide blue-grey leaves make this one SIZE(H X W) 3 feet x 3 feet of the most ornamental agaves available. The characteristic form FLOWER COLOR Golden Yellow resembles that of an artichoke. Found only along the Durango-Zacatecas FLOWER SEASON Blooms once then dies border in Mexico, this agave grows in grasslands at 7500 feet in EXPOSURE Full Sun,Reflected Heat,Partial Shade elevation. This plant produces may WATER Very Low offsets, forming large colonies. A tall branching flower spike holds clusters GROWTH RATE Slow to Moderate of golden yellow flowers. HARDINESS 10°F,USDA Zone 7 PRUNING None " . . '.0.z"- '44(A:::- -'.». '4 ,4 .11, '.. .4t:"kt.g.io., k,,," ',.....„ „A �p "',ye..d"''.a la , e :Nittk 0� , `„ 4, "„r.,-... ..' w'�, � :N..: ,•.z.:'�,. o- , �t {'a,t rLt' , �' If yq , u( . od. " �.. A . t, t , ',PA' r ry � * /, w ° '' , :4 * ,, _ .., , . - , ,., - i 7 ~ ,,, ,. , , e , \\ , t A 4- , , A J , . iiliOrA © Copyright by Mountain States Wholesale Nursery 2006 Visit our web site at www.mswn.com for more information. ARIZONA MUNICIPAL WATER USERS ASSOCIATION CONTACT/DIRECTIONS amvaa Search ONE FOR WATER f 1 DROUGHT CONSERVATION Botanical Name: Lophocereus schottii Common Name: Senita Combination Basics: t Hardiness: 18°F Sun: full or reflected sun Water: very low Growth: Growth Rate: slow Mature Size: 10'height X 10'width Mature Form: columnar Foliage: Evergreen evergreen Foliage Color: light green Flowers: Flower Color pink Flower Season: late spring to summer Comments: Litter: low Thorns: gray spines Allergenic: no Special Features: Wildlife: Features:Flowers bloom at night on"furry"top regions of stems. Native to:Sonoran Desert Recently reclassified as Pachycereus schottii. Photo Gallery click a photo for a larger view Photo:Scott Millard I I ' NOLINA NELSONI MOUNTAIN S.' ES BLUE NOLINA *y0(4SAL E N��SE Blue nolina has a bolder look than other Nolina species, and is often mistaken for a AT A GLANCE SUMMARY Yucca species. The 2 to 3 foot long, 1 inch I wide leaves range from grey-green and SIZE(x X W) 12 feet x 10 feet flexible (juvenile foliage) to powder blue and less flexible (mature foliage). The FLOWER COLOR Chartreuse leaves are edged with tiny teeth. It grows at a moderate rate, eventually developing a 10 FLOWER SEASON Summer to 12 foot tall trunk, crowned by a massive EXPOSURE Full Sun, head of foliage. Old leaves persist along the Reflected Heat trunk, resulting in a naturally shaggy look. These dead leaves can be removed for a WATER Low neater appearance. In the summer Blue GROWTH RATE Slow-Moderate nolina sends up a 10-foot-tall spike of small chartreuse flowers. Blue nolina is very HARDINESS 0°F,USDA Zone 6 adaptable, tolerating full sun and reflected - heat, as well as part shade. PRUNING Remove Spent Flower Stalk ,.,. iiii ,TM , ,..,,,,':d,:',` )t.,,:,,d :,$4,40,: h,:!.m r�/ , ,i'w'..,1/4% ,,,,,,,,,.„,,,,,:it,,,..:.,,‘r i., ,,,,,t 7 . . , ',7. t oi , 11 44640 , N xw r {{ A - 4%04k , ''',N, •t:' A' . A, ,r'' / ' `,\ A. * ,:' ' l''' * •-•:,,, r://'' \ '',( ( r // , , , ) \\ , \ ' \.,,,,, 11 I \\.\\,' i � / /'I 4 �ti jf v t ' vv \ , .'�' ; ' l ARIZONA MUNICIPAL WATER USERS ASSOCIATION CONTACT/DIRECTIONS ,Search ONE FOR WATER- y' f Botanical Name: Pachycereus marginatus Common Name: Mexican Fencepost Combination Basics: t Hardiness: 20°F Sun: full or reflected sun Water: very low Growth: Growth Rate: fast Mature Size: 10'height X 6'width Mature Form: columnar Foliage: Evergreen evergreen Foliage Color: dark green Flowers: Flower Color pink Flower Season: spring Comments: Litter: low Thorns: whitish spines Allergenic: no Special Features: Wildlife: Features:A bold dramatic accent.Good in containers. Native to:southern Mexico May be sold as Stenocereus marginatus. Photo Gallery click a photo for a larger view itof , :4,1 { W Photo:Scott Millard • 1/11/2016 Yucca faxoniana I West Texas Tree Yucca(Spanish Dagger)I Low Water Plants,Eco Friendly Landscapes I Perennials from High Country Gardens Yucca faxoniana West Texas Tree Yucca (Spanish Dagger) ! : ,Fir, iiite .,:, .., of,: ,,,,A,1. :‘ , ., ,,„,. ....„ , . .--- �ti ,�.� t ' ' i I ,,, . Ay 41jo/ v le," \ i . ;."..4 --•,111., ..it-i-...;...., - ,_ ,...„, , '',,,,, \ ., 'I , / " / • ": .***''' ,,,", '4,,,,, '- . , k i1 ' \ l' i • 'r' .„. ' -..- 1$ 1: ,n, R M ' t. ''.''I ),1 0 - , -. , ift ' ,, '1° i'-. i ,V,IT .\\\.: \ \, , i :,./ //,' ,:c ,: tk ,,.:t 4i° HIGH COUNTRY ei 6-12' tall x 3-6 ' wide. Yucca faxoniana is a giant growing tree yucca with excellent cold hardiness, Y. faxoniana is very showy succulent that eventually grows to form a big tree-like trunk. Drought resistant/drought tolerant plant (xeric). Learn More... Out of Stock http://www.highcountrygardens.com/yucca-faxoniana 1/3 1/11/2016 Yucca faxoniana I West Texas Tree Yucca(Spanish Dagger)I Low Water Plants,Eco Friendly Landscapes I Perennials from High Country Gardens Sign up for our newsletter for updates on products. Zones 5 - 10 Advantages Deer Resistant 4 Evergreen Alk Rabbit Resistant Light Full Sun Requirements Annual 10 to 20" Rainfall Ideal Region =-- Only in Western US Bloom Time Late spring Shipping Buy now and we'll ship your order at the ideal planting time for your region. Spring shipping begins February 29, based on zone. Learn More... Size Plant - 2.5" deep pot SKU HBLQ721 Details 6-12' tall x 3-6 ' wide. Yucca faxoniana is a tree yucca from the deserts of West TX. This fantastically ornamental succulent has proven growable into the Denver area, far beyond its native range. Eventually growing to huge size, often with multiple heads, this is the most cold hardy giants of the genus. Watered regularly during the heat of summer, the plant will begin to size up after a decade of growth. Plant West Texas Tree Yucca where it will receive the maximum amount of heat to speed its growth. http://www.highcountrygardens.com/yucca-faxoniana 2/3 1/11/2016 Yucca faxoniana I West Texas Tree Yucca(Spanish Dagger)I Low Water Plants,Eco Friendly Landscapes I Perennials from High Country Gardens SKU HBLQ721 Common Name West Texas Tree Yucca (Spanish Dagger) Botanical Name Yucca faxoniana Zones 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 Light Full S u n Requirements Flower Color White Mature Height 8-15' tall Mature Spread 6-8' wide Bloom Time Late spring Ships As Potted Plant Native Yes Planting Time Spring / Summer Soil Type Sandy Soil, Clay Soil, Average Soil Soil Moisture Very Drought Resistant /Very Waterwise Amount of Rain 10 to 20" Advantages Deer Resistant, Evergreen, Rabbit Resistant Ideal Region Anywhere In The US, Western Only http://www.highcountrygardens.com/yucca-faxoniana 3/3 I A,� '.►l.` YUCCA DECIPIENS MOUNTAIN S TES PALMA CHINA yofsAlf 100�� This slow-growing yucca is native to AT A GLANCE SUMMARY central Mexico, at elevations ranging from 6000 to 8000 feet. It is reminis- SIZE(H X W) 30 feet x 30 feet cent of the Joshua Tree, eventually FLOWER COLOR White forming a branched treelike form. The green leaves are stiff, sharp, and FLOWER SEASON Summer edged with white threads; growing to 2 inches wide by 2 feet long. Our EXPOSURE Full Sun seed-grown specimens in 20 gallon WATER Low containers are about 10 years old. Plant Palma China in full sun and GROWTH RATE Slow well-drained soils. It is hardy to at least 6°F. HARDINESS 6°F,USDA Zone 7 PRUNING Remove Spent Flower Stalks i il',4 IN —..i„4„, E ,, , , --,,, ,-,,, , , t , . fir,. ),.. ..:4k ; N. !' -0' r - w i1 ,i, ,• , � « 4 , �, 1^ ,ry r' .44)"'4 `'`` �Fr •,� Yam'+. `� �, , —.- - a-,,,,,,, ....., st"- , - :' t.,'—' - ',,,,. :- ,,,W1 - . T ,./.......„:,,. y i' illa `" 4 2.a! ; ''. ....;--. ... rs ,. ,, ,, ..e&::$.-3;ill, +. A. .11;--''' ',ilik...ar„',..7° illf.a. f,p .. ,. .. . _i ' _, r thi,r r ,.v:le. 'tt 1, ,j,..., :Si, .,,, 1 r r • ..w slaw r S,~/::- .:' Copyright by Mountain States Wholesale Nursery 2009 Visit our web site at www.mswn.com for more information. I I