HomeMy WebLinkAboutOV139933 pewaa.
I
PLANT ADDRESS:3162 EAST 47TH STREET•TUCSON,ARIZONA 85713-5217•PHONE(520)792-2563•FAX(520)792-9871
MAILING ADDRESS:P.O.BOX 26738•TUCSON,ARIZONA 85726-6378
April 26, 1999
Valerie Feuer(Senior Planner)
Town of Oro Valley
11,000 N. La Canada Dr.
Oro Valley Az 85737
RE: Design Review Board Submittal
Fry's#651 10450 N. LaCanada Dr. Oro Valley
Attachments: Application
(12) sets of plans (elevation and site)
Pearson's check#21589 in the amount of$150.00
Dear Ms. Feuer,
Please accept this DRB Application for above listed location. Submittal is required due to the
FRB Agenda Committee denial of our sign application during the week of April 12th, 1999.
Our request is for 4'/1'reverse channel letters that would be with white neon/halo illumination.
Total square footage of proposed signage is 96.0 sq. ft. These letters would be painted Matthews
#42-212 (Scarlet Red).
Please feel free to contact me should you require any addition information or have any questions
in regards to this submittal.
Sincerely,
Gene "Geno" Rosburg
CORPORATE OFFICES&PLANT:1904 NORTH BLACK CANYON HIGHWAY•PHOENIX,ARIZONA 85009-2914•PHONE(602)272-9461•FAX(602)272-1163
ARIZONA CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE•071342-003 SIGNS•071341-002 PAINTING
TOWN OF ORO WILEY
APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
SUBDIVISION ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
D11'E: A7 .Z6 ,/
OV CASE NO. : b11 V 5- 91- 33 ,
(office use only)
PROJECT: f' ys 466 S/ /a zis o Ai LA 67,v4p 2>,e
SUBDIVISION/NO. OF LOTS:
NUMBER OF MODELS/ELEVATIONS:
,
APPLICANT: P, ,14/2-� ,C.4.5 6/4'/(/�l"
ADDRESS: 3/6,2— , • 7`7 57-• '-kcSo,tf Xi-2- & 7/_3
TELEPHONE NO. : 792-Z:o3 P/9-)( 772- - 9 F7
PROPERTY OWNER: GA V,41' t WO i p/14/C> L TP,
ADDRESS: .50S D 5//DR,gh'4 i PZ.- - /a c) PHONE NO. :
4,I D/,EGo c.4 9Z/D
PROJECT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: ///4
ADDRESS:
DEVELOP:1= EW BOARD G DATE:
SIGNATURE: DATE: f Z�,�'l
r
NOTE: This application shall be accompanied by the required $150.00 fee and twelve
copies of the plans, 11" x 17" in size, each to include dimensioned elevations of
all models from all four sides, front views only of alternative elevations, if any,
floor plans and a typical site plan. AT THE MEETING, applicants must have on hand
for presentation, colored perspective or rendered elevations of all four sides of
one typical model. This rendering must depict the exact type of landscaping
proposed for the project. Samples of paint and trim colors, roof and detail tiles
and photographs of similar products built by the same company are also requested,
if possible.
SUEMITITALS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AT LEAST 15 CALENDAR DAYS IN
ADVANCE OF() # (c;) THE DES D DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD HEARING DATE.
11( \ -
i6,G I
ITEM 6
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD REPORT
MEETING DATE: May 11 t, 1999
(4) I 4+1d1b .411 ‘.0 trv.
TO: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD i.-7Pat176 Al
FROM: David Marsh, Planner I
SUBJECT: OV13-99-33 FRY'S FOOD AND DRUG — WALL SIGN — LOCATED AT
THE CORNER OF LAMBERT LANE AND LA CANADA DRIVE
BACKGROUND:
In the spring of 1999, the Fry's supermarket chain acquired the Smith's supermarket store at the
corner of La Canada & Lambert Lane. Pearson's, representing the Fry's supermarket chain,
requests DRB approval of a permanent wall sign to replace the current "Smith's" sign located on
the front façade of the building.
SUMMARY:
The applicant first submitted an application for a wall sign and monument sign, with both signs
utilizing Fry's corporate red colour. The DRB Agenda Committee denied the application on the
grounds that. if was not complementary and consistent with the copper patina signage used
throughout the commercial center. The applicant then submitted a revised application for the
monument sign with copper patina lettering, which was approved, and requested that the red wall
sign be reviewed by all members of the DRB.
The proposed wall sign is in conformance with the OVZCR requirements for wall signs. The
proposed sign will consist of individual reverse pan channel lettering, painted a Mattews #42-212
colour, also know as "scarlet red". The wall sign will be halo illuminated utilizing a white neon
lighting system mounted within the individual letters. The sign itself will consist of an upper row of
4' high letters 21' long, forming the word "Fry's", and a lower row of letters 1' high and 11'2 '/2"
long forming the words "Food& Drug". The total square footage of the sign is 96 square feet.
GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE:
Staff finds the signage, as presented, to be inconsistent with the Town's General Plan Policy
regarding community design, which states that the Town should "ensure that the built environment
is aesthetically pleasing and compatible with the natural surroundings" and, to accomplish this,
"Earth tone colors and masonry/tile materials are strongly preferred".
RECOMMENDATION:
All sign colors are permitted, except fluorescent or iridescent. However, sign colors for permanent
signs shall utilize complementary and consistent color schemes subject to approval by the DRB
Agenda Committee or the DRB. Staff recommends that DRB not approve the red signage, and
recommend copper patina lettering to maintain conformance with the existing signage in this
commercial center.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Colored Elevation, Photo Composition, and Site Plan
\\ov PZD\Pzl\ov\Ov13\1999\13-99-33\WALLSIGN.RPT.doc
2
r
`o
lAr
n3
ai
a.
f'
u�
d
I �� �
`aye
!� d Q asah
W
/ / 9 c
z c3u�
arrn
ty
REVERSE PAN CHANNELI.
SELF CONTAINED LETTERS o
SIDE VIEW 33.
•
TA
=� WALL nu a
ac
o �
,0(03 ALum ��
a
th
WIT'''
mFOOD & DRUGRemDT�
j j�' NEON TOE TRANSFORMER O
I� by �' d•-}--•
C `wtr
m6wuT `
�` z
Q
f
� � � • ,�..v�eY`�b�"�t ..,��r 1�'�'r� s> "v$�O`' i,..- ��i •. .+�
.y�s yv�'f r .:, -Y 'i.- ' ,fin ' - i -�.x'� .
• _ r Th t,' .`�- ° '.+`.'^'." !.0
. 'B .- y. J LLI
a e7)( 1 IT '' i4 ate. 7 J
1::1-1:1\\*
z REMOVE EXISTING "SMITH'S" SIGNAGE AND REPLACE 0 `� °
f -- _-w- .w, .� WITH NEW"FRY'S FOOD&DRUG".
M
METAL
N.
: ,
063 ALUMINUM CONSTRUCTION
o N
`-A-c_ES ' RETURNS/FAINTED MATTHEWS #42-212 (SCARLET RED).
a
...-10.--44,...".-i:4'
� � w ;�,; y, NEON m o
At
,,.,}. �, ,,;,�,• #4500 WHITE NEON TUBE/!��►_.o -� a a�
. ; 9 ..
Imo�-� Tr2,4�v s�o pew,Elm z x• N
120 VOLT POWER. o N
r
w
N
.....a -.n.o•_-�NF-
U l
U
Z
N
CIL
mossimmZ
~
,
^
16
---'
MINUTES OF THE
ORO VALLEY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING
Tuesday May 11th, 1999
CALL TO ORDER: 6:07 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
Present
Patti Jo Lewis, Chair
Mary Glueck,Vice Chair
Richard Underwood,Member
Jim Vogelsberg,Member
Verlin Smith, Member
Nancy Mager, Member
Others Present:
Valerie Feuer, Senior Planner
Paul Nzomo, Engineer
Dennis Silva, Planner I
Shirley Gay, Clerk
MOTION: MOVED, Seconded (Smith/Vogelsberg) and carried by a 5-0 vote(Mager
abstained) to approve the April 13th, 1999 Development Review Board Meeting
Minutes as written.
CONSENT AGENDA
A. OV13-99-32 Elwood Room Addition, Sun City
B. OV13-99-70 Dominion Homes,Naranja Ranch,Model 1750
C. OV13-99-27 Villages of La Canada Models 2591, 2838,2886,3084
MOTION: Moved, seconded (Smith/Glueck) and carried by a 6-0 to Recommend approval
of Consent Items A thu C subject to Staff conditions.
REGULAR AGENDA
OV12-98-19 CANADA DEL ORO RIVERFRONT PARK LANDSCAPE PLAN
ADDENDUM-SITE LIGHTING-CONTINUED FROM APRIL 13TH, 1999
05-11-99 Development Review Board Minutes Page 2
McGann & Associates has presented a site lighting scheme for the CDO Riverfront Park, which
will include nine different types of light fixtures. While the proposed lighting scheme is in
conformance with the requirements of Article 6-7 of the Town Code, Staff earlier expressed
concerns over the type of lighting proposed and the hours of operation of some of the fixtures.
Staff has met with the lighting consultants hired by the Town, and they have satisfied Staffs
previous concerns. Staff had requested that the Parks & Recreation Administrator review the
lighting scheme proposed by this plan prior to submittal of the Staff report to Council. The Parks
& Recreation Administrator has reviewed the lighting plan, and her comment letter is attached
herewith. The Oro Valley Police Department has also reviewed the proposed lighting plan;
however, they do have some concerns and will meet with the applicant prior to Town Council
review of this project.
Valerie Feuer informed the DRB that the conditions have been met and Staff recommends
approval. Member Smith asked what condition and Valerie replied the concerns that the OVPD
had. The OVPD has met with Parks Administrator and Staff and those concerns have been
resolved. Member Underwood asked Anisley Reeder the Park Administrator did she feel this
would be adequate and compatible for the Town. Ms. Reeder commented that a meeting was
held with the neighborhood, lighting engineers and Don McGann. She felt that a good
compromise had been met between all parties.
Don McGann, McGann and Associates, representing the Town commented that what was being
done with the lighting issue was to balance the issues of Public Safety, esthetics, and how the
lighting is perceived by the adjacent area residents. It was based on photometrics of on field
lighting and still lighting, the four-pole eight lighting fixture system preformed well. General
area lighting, which includes lights around the playground, perimeter walk, and lights around the
parking lot will typically be on at dusk off at park closing time. There are five lights that will be
on from dusk to dawn for security purposes.
Member Smith asked Officer Trujillo was the police department satisfied with the plan.
Officer Trujillo, OVPD, commented the lighting plan is set up with computer control, which the
Police Department will have access to. He felt that a fair compromise had been reached between
all parties for safety purposes.
MOTION: Moved, seconded (Smith/Glueck) and carried by a 6-0 vote to recommend
approval of OV12-98-19 Canada Del Oro Riverfront Park Landscape Plan Addendum -
Site Lighting subject to Staff conditions.
OV13-99-34 CANADA CROSSROADS ARCHITECTURE
Valerie Feuer introduced the staff report into the record. The building height is less than 18 feet
from finished grade, which provides a building of a more neighborhood scale than the
commercial developments on the northeast and northwest corners of the intersection. The
building style resembles territorial, using flat roofs of varying heights, portals, and divided pane
windows. Each building has a variety of storefront treatments, with different color and column
05-11-99 Development Review Board Minutes Page 3
elements defining each storefront. Arcades along much of the building front provide shade for
pedestrians and articulation for visual interest.
The storefronts on each end of Building A are painted stucco "Peddle Pusher", a cream color
(which shows up as white on the colored elevations). The storefront with arches and
wainscotting is split face block in a variegated "Santa Rosa." Slump block accents in adobe red
are used at the top of each arch. The remaining storefront is painted stucco "Buff Pill", and the
smooth finish pre-cast concrete columns are colored to match the slump block. The south
elevation, facing the residential area, is painted "peddle pusher" with adobe red slump block
above each of six rear employee entrances. Staff finds that the architect has designed a
commercial center that meets the intent of the neighborhood commercial zone. The arched
elements and colors provide consistency with the existing commercial buildings at the
intersection. A condition is attached to enhance the rear of the buildings by adding parapet trim
in the adobe red. Staff has evaluated the Canada Crossroads architecture against the General Plan
policies and finds that it meets Policy 9.1 F, all sides of buildings should be coherently designed
and treated, and Policy 9.1 G, development proposals should incorporate means of reducing the
apparent size and bulk of buildings.
Sean Cullen, representing Burlini/Silberschlag, Ltd. was present for questions and provided
colored visuals. Member Smith asked what is the color of the roof. Mr. Cullen replied it would
be the same color as the building, which is a cream color.
Jim Ruhman, 10380 N. Hacienda Hermosa, commented he had no concerns about the color of
the building. He did express his concern about the lighting. Valerie Feuer informed Mr.
Ruhman when the building plans came forward she would inform him so he could look at the
plans. Mr. Ruhman asked when the sidewalk would be in at Lambert Lane. Paul Nzomo the
sidewalk would be put in approximately two years.
Karen Stratman, 1707 N. Placita Caracol, she commented that the architecture looked good but
the reason she came was to voice her concerns about sidewalks on Lambert Lane.
Jerry Roberts, 10280 N. Camino Valdeflores, commented that the majority of the residents he
talked to liked the copper patina that is one the front of the building for signage and hoped that it
would be left that way.
MOTION: Moved, seconded (Vogelsberg/Smith) and carried by a 6-0 vote to recommend
approval of OV13-99-34 Canada Crossroads Architecture subject to Staff conditions.
PLANNING STAFF CONDITIONS
1. All flat roofs shall be painted to match exterior wall color.
2. All mechanical equipment shall be screened.
3. Signage must comply with OVZCR and will be reviewed separately.
4. Parapet trim in adobe red shall be added to the rear of the buildings.
.
05-11-99 Development Review Board Minutes Page 4
OV12-99-06 CHURCH OF THE APOSTLES DEVELOPMENT PLAN, LOCATED ON
THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TANGERINE ROAD AND LA CHOLLA
BOULEVARD
Dennis Silva introduced the staff report into the record. The subject parcel is 35.8 acres and its
existing zoning is R1-144 and will consist of a church and parochial school. Twenty-eight acres
will be open space and building coverage will be about one acre. A Conditional Use Permit for
the development of a parochial school on this site is currently being reviewed by the Planning
and Zoning Commission. When completed, the parochial school would consist of grades K-8
and have approximately 220 students. Phase I will consist of the Parish Hall Sanctuary,
Reception Wing, Office Wing and Parking. Phase II will consist of a future sanctuary, the
parochial school and more parking.
Paul Nzomo introduced the engineer's report into the record. Access to the site is proposed from
three locations. There will one from Como Road, and two future access points; one from La
Cholla Boulevard and the other one from Limewood Drive. A traffic analysis was prepared for
this project. At full build out, the project is expected to generate 945 trips per day entering and
exiting the site. The commercial use of the parcel will require that 5-year threshold retention be
provided. The site has not been designed as being located in a critical or balanced basin;
therefore, detention for this site will not be required. Grading will only be limited to the
locations of proposed parking lots, buildings and driveways. The Town Council approved the
translational zoning for this property with the condition that no more that 30% of the 36-acre site
may be developed, which meets the intent of the UGB. The development plan complies with this
Town Council condition. Staff has reviewed the request for a development plan for this parcel
and recommends approval.
Valerie Feuer stated she had a condition that needed to be added. The parochial school will be
included in phase two only if the Conditional Use Permit is approved by the Town.
Member Vogelsberg commented that the summary reads that the future alignment of La Cholla
will encroach on the property, who would assume the cost of the alignment. Mr. Nzomo replied
that they are working with PAG to get funding for that project.
Charlie Hulsey, WLB Group, representing the Church of the Apostles stated there where no
problems with Staff conditions, he was available for questions. Member Glueck asked what the
phasing time would be. Mr. Hulsey replied that depends on the contributions to the church.
Member Glueck also questioned how the neighbors felt. Mr. Hulsey stated there are mixed
emotions about a church coming into that area. But with the amount of buffer area it can't be
seen from the road.
MOTION: Moved, seconded (Underwood/Glueck) and carried by a 6-0 vote to recommend
approval of OV12-99-06 Church of the Apostles Development Plan, Located on the
Northwest Corner of Tangerine Road and La Cholla Boulevard subject to Staff conditions.
PLANNING STAFF CONDITIONS:
05-11-99 Development Review Board Minutes Page 5
1. The development plan shall be revised to include pedestrian walkways within the parking
lots that would lead to pedestrian crossing of the main drive aisle at points midway
between the parking area entrances. This will lead to a more safe and orderly crossing of
the main drive aisle. It would reduce congestion at the parking lot access points and
improve safety.
2. The pick-up/drop-off area along the drive aisle north of the school shall be increased from
80 feet in length to 200 feet long.
3. An off-site watershed map should be provided.
4. A hydraulic analysis of the sheetflow affecting the western portion of the site shall be
provided (i.e. cross-section(s) and hydraulic rating).
5. The remaining portion of Como Drive and Limewood Drive should be paved with Phase
II of this development plan.
6. The conveyor channel at section AA is shown to have 2:1 side slopes with hand-
placed/dumped riprap. Rock riprap lined channels should have side slopes no steeper
than 3:1 when using the City of Tucson Standards Manual for rock sizing. The side slopes
should either be modified to reflect 3:lsteepness or a riprap stability analysis should be
provided to demonstrate the adequacy of the rock size.
7. More details shall be provided for the proposed outlet weir structures associated with the
retention basin at CP 4.3. This shall include demonstrating that the structure has
adequate capacity to convey the 100-year flow and that adequate erosion protection is
provided at the outlet.
8. The maximum ponding depth within the retention basin should be demonstrated and be
in compliance with the depth/ side slope requirements of the Stormwater Detention /
Retention Manual. The method of disposal of the retained runoff should be stated (I.e.
infiltration\bleeder pipe). The report should also provide calculations,which demonstrate
that the basin will drain within the maximum drain-time specified within the Stormwater
Detention/Retention Manual.
9. The design discharge of 72 cfs that was used for the channel at sec. AA should be
documented. This discharge value is not listed within the Table of 100-year Post-
development discharges.
10. Details shall be provided relating to the outlet points of drainage from the paved parking
areas (i.e. depressed curbs,erosion protection, etc.)
11. Hydraulic analysis should be provided for the at-grade crossing at CP 4.3 and CP 2.4,
which demonstrate all-weather access and appropriate erosion control.
12. A hydraulic analysis should be provided for the proposed 24" CMP at CP 4.7.
13. A revised and detailed drainage report is required addressing all drainage report
comments.
14. Improvement plans for Deceleration lane on Tangerine Road shall be submitted to Public
works for review and approval prior to obtaining a grading permit.
15. Delineate the watershed limits for each concentration point on the drainage report
development plan exhibit.
16. Delineate the limits of sheet flow, its depth and its hydraulic ratings on the development
plan.
17. Call out pre/post- developed water surface elevation cross-section at 100' interval for the
floodplain limits at the watershed for CP 2.
05-11-99 Development Review Board Minutes Page 6
18. The median for the driveway off Como Road and La Cholla Blvd. shall not extend into
R/W. please correct.
19. Delineate the limits for the Retention basin area and call out its ponding depth and slopes
on the development plan.
20. Call out in/out let elevations for all proposed storm drain pipes.
21. Provide a typical cross section for handicap parking space.
22. Provide documentation regarding the legal right of the church to have access over Como
Road and Limewood Drive.
23. Provide clear and legible copies of documents recorded in Docket 495,page 262.
Improvements to Limewood Drive need to be reviewed and approved by Pima
County Transportation Department.
24. In the location map, delete "Pima County" listed above the Naranja Ranch I
subdivision. That parcel is located within the Town of Oro Valley.
25. The following development standards shall be listed in the general notes of this
development plan:
> Setbacks: Front—50', Side—20', Rear—50'.
> No building shall exceed 25 feet in height. Steeples, spires, towers, and
architectural elements may be permitted up to 34 feet in height. Religious
symbols placed atop such structures are not included in the calculation of
building height, but are limited to a maximum height of 5 feet.
> No more than 30% of the 36-acre site may be developed, which will meet the
intent of the UGB.
26. Grading limits should be revised to reflect the phasing of this project.
27. Parochial school will be included in phase two only if the Conditional Use Permit
is approved by the Town
OV12-99-06 CHURCH OF THE APOSTLES LANDSCAPE PLAN, LOCATED ON THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF TANGERINE ROAD AND LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD
Dennis Silva introduced the staff report into the record. The subject parcel is located within the
newly annexed area of the Town known as La Cholla/Tangerine. The open space will be
preserved in its natural state, which will provide for a adequate buffer between the adjacent
properties, and the developed area will be landscaped with trees, shrubs, and groundcover. In
addition, a number of Palo Verde trees will be preserved in place in and around the parking area.
The parking lot islands will be landscaped as well as the perimeter of the developed area. There
will also be landscaping along the driveways and the proposed layout of the church and parochial
school. Staff has reviewed the request for a landscape plan for this parcel and recommends
approval.
Mr. Vint, architect for Church of the Apostles, was present for questions. Member Underwood
asked Mr. Vint what were they trying to accomplish with this landscape plan. Mr. Vint replied
they are trying to make it a sanctuary around the church and enhance it with a trail. Member
Glueck asked Member Underwood if he had any suggestions to replace the Scarlet Betony.
05-11-99 Development Review Board Minutes Page 7
Member Underwood commented he felt the Scarlet Betony would be okay provided it was on an
irrigation system. If it doesn't get water it will go dormant, but he felt it would be okay since
there wasn't that many of them.
MOTION: Moved, seconded Underwood/Mager and carried by a 6-0 vote to recommend
approval of OV12-99-06 Church of the Apostles Landscape Plan, Located on the Northwest
Corner of Tangerine Road and La Cholla Boulevard subject to staff conditions.
PLANNING STAFF CONDITIONS:
1. The Stachys Coccinea/Scarlet Betony must be substituted with another plant since it
may require substantial water. The plants used in the landscape plan must de drought
tolerant.
2. Per Section 14-207, all graded areas not landscaped, stabilized or developed upon
expiration of the grading permit shall be revegetated in conformance with the following
standards within 30 days of expiration. The treatment of all graded areas shall require
the approval of the Development Review Board.
PREVIEW: RANCHO VISTOSO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ARCHITECUTRE
REPORT
Amphitheatre School District is planning to build a new elementary school on the eastside of
Woodburne Avenue south of Moore Road. The school is scheduled to open in July 2000.
Dr. Cathy Esposito, Associate Superintendent Amphi School District in charge of the
project. She complimented Staff for working so well with her.
Ron Epley, Architect representing Amphi School District presented to the DRB colored visuals
to give them an idea of how the school would look. The site is 9.4 acres, he pointed out where
the multipurpose auditorium would be, where bus drop off and pick up would be and other
locations. Mr. Epley also provided a floor plan of the school.
Member Underwood questioned if there would be enough playground for the number of
students they would have. Dr. Esposito commented yes there would be, but there is talk of the
Town possibly donating the five acre common area which would give more space for
playgrounds. Member Glueck agreed more area is needed for playground and possibly moving
the school further away from residential area. Member Mager asked if the Town donates the
common area to the school, would the public be able to use the park area.
Wayne Wiant, 76 E Marvel Canyon Road, commented he didn't want the school close to the
residents and asked that the Board to give the same consideration to the residents in Copper
Creek. Perhaps a barrier could be set up between the school and the residence.
Fran LaSala, Council Member commented this is a great opportunity to build a school in Oro
Valley that we can be a part of. Lets make it the best school that we can build. He agreed the
05-11-99 Development Review Board Minutes Page 8
9.4 acres is not enough space and would support giving the five acres to the school district. He
stated Council has made a commitment to work with Amphi School. This is a good
opportunity for the Town, Vistoso Partners and Amphi School to work together but it would
take cooperation on all parts.
Member Mager asked if the five acres is given to the school would it affect parking.
Mr. Eply commented that more than adequate parking would be available.
Valerie Feuer commented that this is a fast moving plan, Council will discuss giving the land to
the school at the next Council Meeting. Member Glueck asked would there be a wall around the
school and suggested making the school blend in with the neighborhood.
Dr. Esposito commented she appreciated input from the DRB and that there will be Focus groups
to get input from the neighbors as they want community involvement to make this a great school.
OV13-99-25 THE INN AT VISTOSO ARCHITECTURE
Valerie Feuer introduced the staff report into the record. The subject property is bounded by
Rancho Vistoso Blvd. on the east, Vistoso Highlands Drive on the south, and the Club at Vistoso
golf course on the west and north. The development plan and landscape plan for this project
were reviewed and recommended for approval by DRB on March 16, 1999. The building design
is a unique blend of southwest architecture with a Vistoso theme. Vistoso stone veneer is used as
a major exterior wall element in the main house and as accents on the casitas, and the entry tower
at the corner of Vistoso Highlands Drive and Rancho Vistoso Blvd. is echoed by the hotel entry
tower. Stucco wall colors will be "La Grand" brown for the field color and "Brazen" beige for
the accent. The variety of roof heights in the main building as well as the casita style guest
rooms help minimize the apparent size and bulk of the buildings. The building height of the
main building is 31 feet, which is allowed by the PAD. The entry tower is 39 feet high, which is
allowed to exceed the building by OVZCR. A PAD amendment was approved by Town Council
on March 17, 1999 allowing the height limitation to be exceeded on specific casita buildings.
Staff has evaluated the Inn at Vistoso architecture against the General Plan policies and finds that
it meets Policy 9.1F, all sides of buildings should be coherently designed and treated, and Policy
9.1 G, development proposals should incorporate means of reducing the apparent size and bulk of
buildings. Staff recommends approval.
James Barg, architect representing the Raddison Group was available for questions.
Member Glueck asked about the inside of the main entry. What will be the focus point. Mr. Barg
commented that there would be a series of hanging lighting fixtures. Member Smith commented
about the parking spaces would there be enough. Valerie Feuer commented that overflow
parking would be provided at the Golf Club which is adjacent to the Raddison.
05-11-99 Development Review Board Minutes Page 9
MOTION: Moved, seconded (Mager/Smith) and carried by a 6-0 vote to recommend
approval of OV13-99-25 The inn at Vistoso Architecture subject to Staff conditions.
PLANNING STAFF CONDITIONS:
1. All chimneys shall have an Oro Valley approved chimney cap.
2. All flat roofs shall be painted to match exterior wall color.
3. All mechanical equipment shall be screened.
4. Signage must comply with Rancho Vistoso sign guidelines and will be reviewed separately.
OV13-99-33 FRY'S FOOD AND DRUG - WALL SIGN - LOCATED AT THE CORNER
OF LAMBERT LANE AND LA CANADA DRIVE
In the spring of 1999, the Fry's supermarket chain acquired the Smith's supermarket store at the
corner of La Canada&Lambert Lane. Pearson's,representing the Fry's supermarket chain,requests
DRB approval of a permanent wall sign to replace the current"Smith's"sign located on the front
façade of the building.
The applicant first submitted an application for a wall sign and monument sign,with both signs
utilizing Fry's corporate red color. The DRB Agenda Committee denied the application on the
grounds that it was not complementary and consistent with the copper patina signage used
throughout the commercial center. The applicant then submitted a revised application for the
monument sign with copper patina lettering,which was approved, and requested that the red wall
sign be reviewed by all members of the DRB. The proposed wall sign is in conformance with the
OVZCR requirements for wall signs. The proposed sign will consist of individual reverse pan
channel lettering,painted a Mattews#42-212 color, also know as"scarlet red". The wall sign will
be halo illuminated utilizing a white neon lighting system mounted within the individual letters.
The sign itself will consist of an upper row of 4' high letters 21' long, forming the word"Fry's",
and a lower row of letters 1' high and 11'2 'A"long forming the words"Food&Drug". The total
square footage of the sign is 96 square feet. Staff finds the signage, as presented, to be inconsistent
with the Town's General Plan Policy regarding community design,which states that the Town
should"ensure that the built environment is aesthetically pleasing and compatible with the natural
surroundings"and,to accomplish this, "Earth tone colors and masonry/tile materials are strongly
preferred".
All sign colors are permitted, except fluorescent or iridescent. However, sign colors for permanent
signs shall utilize complementary and consistent color schemes subject to approval by the DRB
Agenda Committee or the DRB. Staff recommends that DRB not approve the red signage, and
recommend copper patina lettering to maintain conformance with the existing signage in this
commercial center.
Jerry Stutler, representing Fry's, commented after much consideration he has withdrawn his
application and will resubmit the application with revised colors to the Agenda Committee.
05-11-99 Development Review Board Minutes Page 10
STAFF REPORT
Valerie Feuer briefly discussed the design guidelines that were approved by Town Council,
copies would be available as soon as they were printed. She informed the Board that a lot of big
projects were up coming things will be getting busy. In June there will be a site tour of Lambert
Lane and La Canada the commercial corner.
MOTION: Moved, seconded (Smith/Underwood) and carried by a 6-0 vote to adjourn the
May 11th, 1999 Development Review Board Meeting at 8:45 p.m
Shirley Gay
DRB Clerk