HomeMy WebLinkAboutOV139944 Jul 20 99 11 : 44a Community Development 520 742 1022 p. 2
-\\.\ \,
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
PLANNING &ZONING DIVISION
11,000 N.LA CANADA DRIVE,ORO VALLEY AZ 85737
OU1� Phone: (520)797-9797 Fax: (520)742-1022
APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
PROJECT ARCHITF('TURE
DATE: S-'?�
OV CASE NO.: OV15-611- 1•1"k (office use only)
PROJECT: U/Lp/iV �'' .. %J.1 ,� r��= _ /A10'
LOCATION: / f:4U0 00616 AP**,
APPLICANT: 1.00Y j, e
ADDRESS: g5/4 4, lo40 I"J'4 :4E2
PARCEL NUMBER:
TELEPHONE NO.:( > t�X0''7.V? FAX NO.: (.1e0)6,4, COP3�p�
t
PROPERTY OWNER: 4 .41.044e,
ADDRESS: 5A+Ptd
PHONE NO.: 1 y/
PROJECT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: 6../~4// ,41/ ____ellgC4,1/1-e0(45_,14
ADDRESS: 55e;„,.. /14 AL ,f,�''. >.•"y'I' ,
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW B ARING DATE:
(�
SIGNATURE: ,. DATE: 1�' �' ??
NOTE: This application must be accompanied by the required $150.00 fee and twelve copies of the plans,
11" x 17" in size, each to include dimensioned elevations of all structures from all four sides and a copy of
the project's site plan. The submittal must also include a proposed color palette for the project in an 8.5" x
11" format, to include color chips of body and trim colors and tile color and style, if applicable. Building
square footage is also required. AT THE MEETING, applicants must have on hand for presentation. colored
perspective or rendered elevations of all four sides of the structures.
SUBMITTALS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AT LEAST 18
CALENDAR DAYS IN ADVANCE OF THE DESIRED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD
HEARING DATE.
FAki BAKtK
1\Ov PZD\PZL\ADMIN\FORMS\DRBPROJARC
tOD Lh
SEAVERF " NKS
ARCHITE ;, S IINL. AIA LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
2552 N.Alvernon Way/Tucson,Arizona 85712
(520)795-4000/(520)795-9431 Fax
SFA Job No. / 6 ' File No. Enclosed Please Find:
Date: el., 0- 9` 0 Prints ❑ Specifications
To: in�1�'Z[,1/�/ � � ��,(,�'�'' 0 Original Plans 0 Change Order
cefr ❑ Shop Drawings ❑ Copy
0 Samples 0 Attached
Attn: p4iu 144frgii ❑
Re: gW/ CO3 1, /17 1 P,
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
f -- 7-2 21? //�X/7" 107(/� f'GA�N'`
/�- ?-22 -7 // 'XJ7k '/7 fl/,-¢, /
TRANSMITTED FOR REASONS NOTED:
❑ For Approval 0 For Signature 0 Reviewed
❑ For Your Use 0 For Your Record 0 Correct As Noted
❑ As Requested 0 Returned For Corrections 0 Resubmit Copies
For Review & Comment 0 For Approval As Noted 0 Return Corrected Prints
❑ For Bids/Prices Due 19 0 Prints Returned
REMARKS:
Copies To: ❑
0 Signed:
Enclosure(s):
1
MINUTES OF THE
ORO VALLEY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING
Tuesday August 10th, 1999
CALL TO ORDER: 6:10 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
Present
Patti Jo Lewis, Chair
Mary Glueck, Vice Chair
Jim Vogelsberg, Member
Bruce Enger,Member
Nancy Mager,Member
Absent
Barbara Bell,Member
Richard Underwood, Member
Others Present:
Valerie Feuer, Senior Planner
Shirley Gay,DRB Clerk
Craig Civalier, Engineer PE
MOTION: Moved, Seconded(Enger/Mager) and carried by a 5-0 vote to approve the
July 13th, 1999 Development Review Board Meeting Minutes as written
CONSENT AGENDA
A. OV13-99-45 Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 11 H&N Custom Home, Lot 74
B. OV13-99-46 Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 11 H&N Model 2880, Lot 51
C. OV13-99-47 Naranja Ranch, Lybeck Custom Home, Lot 74
D. OV13-99-48 Naranja Ranch, Dagen Custom Home, Lot 62
E. OV13-99-49 Naranja Ranch, Rulney Custom Home, Lot 49
F. OV13-99-50 Naranja Ranch,Valdenegro Custom Home, Lot 43
G. OV13-99-54 Naranja Ranch, Elrod Custom Home, Lot 42
08-10-99 Development Review Board Minutes Page 2
H. OV13-99-55 Naranja Ranch, Schrick Custom Home, Lot 54
I. OV13-95-17 Rancho Vistoso NB 5 T, Pulte Homes Model 2842, Lots 17 & 77
J. OV13-99-53 Ironwood Canyon,Wachiwiak Room Addition, Lot 39
K. OV13-97-07 Rancho Vistoso 5U, Safeway Vistoso Plaza Shop Bldg. C
L. OV13-97-68 Rancho Vistoso NB 10M, Maravilla, Baird Homes, Plan 5
M. OV13-99-25 Rancho Vistoso NB 10J, Inn at Vistoso, Accessory Buildings
N. OV13-99-44 Oro Valley Retail Center Block 8 Architecture
O. OV12-99-08 Oro Valley Retail Center Block 8 Landscape Plan
P. OV12-99-10 Rancho Vistoso lON Model Home Complex Landscape Plan
Q. OV12-98-1A Rancho Vistoso NB 11 Stone Canyon Golf Course Temporary Clubhouse
and Recreation Center Landscape Plan
R. OV13-99-56 Hippauf Front Room Addition, 1605 N. Crown Ridge Way, Sun City
Chair Lewis pulled item K as there would be discussion and asked if any other items needed
pulled for discussion and Member Glueck asked if item N and 0 could be pulled as she had
questions on those items. Member Glueck asked if anyone was present to speak on item D. Mr.
Lybeck approached the podium and was in agreement to tone down the Terra Cota to be
consistent with what is in the neighborhood.
MOTION: Moved, seconded (Vogelsberg/Glueck) and carried by a 5-0 vote to recommend
approval of Consent Items A-J, L thru M, and P thru R and stipulating item D tone down the
Terra Cota.
Item K, Valerie Feuer commented that the applicant had resubmitted plans to show the doors in the
back of the building. Also an added condition from staff was to add the tile accent on the back of
the building,which was done.
MOTION: Moved, seconded (Glueck/Mager) and carried by a 5-0 vote to recommend
approval of Item K of the Consent Agenda subject to staff conditions.
Item N,Member Glueck wanted to add a condition that the colors match the existing building.
MOTION: Moved, seconded (Mager/Glueck) and carried by a 5-0 vote to recommend
approval of Item N of the Consent Agenda subject to staff conditions and stipulating an
added condition #5, color matches existing building.
Item 0, Member Glueck had a question on the landscape plan. Mr. Hulsey, WLB, was present for
questions. Member Glueck asked about item 3 of the staff conditions. Valerie Feuer commented
that was added to clean up the planting plan legend. Member Glueck then questioned item 5 of
staff conditions. Valerie Feuer commented that this was added so that the landscaping on each pad
would be consistent. Member Glueck also had a question about condition 6, who would maintain
the landscaping? Mr. Hulsey replied by the master developer or until the association takes over.
MOTION: Moved, seconded (Glueck/Vogelsberg) and carried by a 5-0 vote to recommend
approval of Consent Item 0
08-10-99 Development Review Board Minutes Page 3
REGULAR AGENDA
PREVIEW: FIRST AVENUE AND LAMBERT LANE SLOPE STABILIZATION
Bill Jansen, Town engineer introduced his report into the record.
The Public Works Department is planning a slope stabilization at the intersection of First Avenue
and Lambert Lane. Which would be the northwest corner. The project will include the import and
placement of fill, the placement of rock rip-rap and erosion control fabrics, seeding with native
plants, planting of trees, and the installation of an irrigation system. This commitment was made
by the Town to take care of this corner when the county was finished with their work.
Don McGaan, McGaan and Associates provided an overview and location of the project. He
briefly discussed the improvements that need to be made. He asked for comments from the DRB
to incorporate into the final plan. Member Mager asked how long would this project take. Mr.
McGaan replied approximately 60 days. Member Vogelsberg asked was this project in this year's
budget. Mr. Jansen commented that the project was supplemented in this year's CIP budget.
PUBLIC HEARING: OV13-99-40 GRADING WAIVER, LOT 34,WILDRIDGE
Mr. Jansen introduced the engineer's report into the record. Cella Barr Associates is requesting a
grading waiver for construction of a single family resident for lot 34 in the Wild Ridge Estates.
The waiver is required because some of the proposed depths of cut and fill necessary to construct
the new home and driveway will result in terracing exceeding 8 feet by 3 feet. As per article 15-
401 A, the proposed cuts and fills, if properly constructed and stabilized, present no obvious
safety hazard. Portion of the cut slopes exceeding Article 15-401 standards will be visible from
the adjacent street, Copper Spring Trail Drive. Public Works department staff has reviewed the
grading waiver request for the proposed single family residence, and recommends approval.
Warren Thompson, Cellar Barr Associates, representing Genesee, was present for questions. He
provided a site plan on the overview to show the lot in relationship to other lots around it. He
stated that this house is 10 feet below the street. He commented that by the topography the lot is
about 15 feet below finished floor elevation. Mr. Thompson commented that item four of the
staff comments, he would like to have that removed he is not sure where that came from this
house is not intended for handicap people. . Mr. Jansen replied Paul Nzomo wrote up the report
and was not sure himself how that came about.
Member Glueck asked what part of the plans needed the waiver. Mr. Thompson commented that
the waiver was for two retaining walls. Member Enger asked how much was explored at
building the house at various levels. Mr. Thompson replied he has worked extensively at trying
to get this house to fit on the lot without the waiver and he felt it could not be done. Valerie
Feuer commented that it is not often a custom home is brought before the Board asking for a
variance, this is unusual.
08-10-99 Development Review Board Minutes Page 4
MOTION: Moved, seconded (Vogelsberg/Mager) and carried by a 5-0 vote to recommend
approval for OV13-99-40 Grading Waiver, Single Family Residence Lot 34, Wild Ridge,
subject to staff conditions and stipulating item 4 of staff comments be deleted.
PUBLIC HEARING: OV12-96-7 GRADING WAIVER, WALGREENS INGRESS AND
EGRESS ON LAMBERT LANE
Bill Jansen introduced the engineer's report into the record. The applicant is requesting a
variance to allow a maximum depth of the cut of 9 feet instead of 6 feet. This cut will occur at
the toe of slope on the north side off the roadway, approximately 460 feet west of the centerline
of La Canada Drive. This grading exception will allow construction of a left and right-turn
access to and from the Walgreens and Children's World. It addresses more adequately a public
safety issue for people making illegal left turns into the Walgreens site via the existing right-in
only access.
Bruce Paton, Rick Engineering, was present for questions. He commented he was in agreement
with staff conditions. Member Glueck commented there are problems with illegal turns now.
Won't this create more problems? Mr. Paton replied there would be a traffic control island that
will help. The delivery trucks will continue to make right turns from La Canada only, as they
have been instructed and this is enforced by Walgreens.
PUBLIC HEARING OPENED:
Jerry Roberts, 10280 N. Camino Valedeflores, expressed his concern about the safety factor and
visibility. He felt that the waiver should wait until the improvements are made to widen Lambert
Lane.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED:
Member Mager asked how long will the construction time take. Mr. Paton replied approximately
60 to 90 days. Member Vogelsberg asked who was paying for this project. Mr. Paton stated that
Walgreens is paying for this project. Member Glueck expressed her concern about safety. She
felt the left turn off of Lambert would be dangerous. Member Glueck explained she would like
to see a comprehensive plan for this corner instead of seeing changes coming back before the
Board.
MOTION: Moved, seconded (Mager/Eager) and carried by a 3-2 vote (Glueck/Lewis
opposed) to recommend approval of the Grading Exception Request for Walgreen's at the
Northwest Corner of La Canada/Lambert Lane, OV12-96-07
STAFF CONDITIONS:
1. Improvement plans for Lambert Lane widening shall be submitted to Town Engineer's
office for review and approval.
2. Slope stability from a Geotechnical engineer is required.
08-10-99 Development Review Board Minutes Page 5
3. Striping and sign plan is required. Be sure to include "NO TRUCK TURNING" signs
at the driveway exit.
4. Drainage ditch and concrete header for the entire length of pavement added to Lambert
Lane is required.
5. Landscape plan for the 6' bench shall be submitted to Planning and Zoning for review
and approval.
6. A flashing yellow light shall be installed at least 1500 feet west of the driveway along
Lambert Lane.
7. No left turn from the driveway into eastbound traffic on Lambert Lane will be allowed.
8. Drainage statement demonstrating how the flows from Lambert Lane will be conveyed
into the catch basin is required.
9. Modified slurry seal shall be applied over the entire width of Lambert Lane along the
length of the new pavement.
10. No truck sign shall be installed on the driveway off Lambert Lane.
OV13-99-51 RIVERS EDGE SUBDIVISION, KE&G MODELS 1629, 1740, 1829, 1839,
1944, 1949, 2197, and 2467
Valerie Feuer introduced the staff report into the record. The models range in size from 1629
square feet to 2467 square feet of living space, and all the models except Model 2467 are single
story homes. All the models are of a southwestern contemporary architectural style, and feature
tiled roofs, wainscotting, corbels, architecturally framed windows and entryways, keystone, inset
windows, arched picture windows, and popouts. Staff finds these models to be compatible with
other models in the subdivision, which feature similar architectural styles and details and
recommends approval subject to staff conditions.
Rick Cook, representing K E & G commented he had no problems with staff conditions and was
available for questions.
MOTION: Moved, seconded (Enger/Glueck) and carried by a 5-0 vote to recommend
approval of OV13-99-51 KE&G Model 1629, 1740, 1829, 1839, 1944, 1949, 2197, and 2467
Rivers Edge Subdivision, subject to staff conditions.
Staff Conditions:
1. Windows shall either be recessed or popped out, except where under a porch.
2. Spark arrestors shall be camouflaged with a cap.
3. Ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be enclosed by a wall to provide visual
screening and noise.
4. The color palette for these models shall match that currently in use in the Rivers Edge
subdivision.
08-10-99 Development Review Board Minutes Page 6
OV13-99-52 T. J. BEDNAR HOMES MODEL 1900/2202, FAIRWAY VILLAGE &
COPPER RIDGE ESTATES II
Valerie Feuer introduced the staff report into the record. The Model 1900/2202 home can be
described as having a Mission style. Architectural elements for this single-story home include a
tiled roof, architecturally framed windows, corbels, and wainscotting. The model has a 3-car
garage option, and features two elevations. Color palettes have been submitted for each
subdivision for the model. The proposed color palette for Fairway Village includes Baja White
and Fairway Village beige as exterior colors, with Porpoise, Teal, and Cocoa as trim colors. The
proposed color palette for Copper Ridge Estates II is more extensive, and includes Caballeor
Clay, Madera, Valley Floor, Fandango, and Hondo exterior colors and Prince Blue, Eucalyptus,
and Sassy Miss trim colors. The color palette for Copper Ridge Estates II will bring a greater
variety of colors and help to break up the "monochromatic" appearance of the Town. Staff
recommends that the Porpoise, Teal and Cocoa trim colors not be used for Fairway Village, as
the HOA has approved the architecture for the model on the condition that the exterior colors and
trim be consistent with those currently in the neighborhood.
Ted Bednar, T. J. Bednar Homes, commented he had no problems with staff conditions. He
commented he would use the colors staff suggested. Mr. Bednar also provided color samples for
the Board to review. Mr. Bednar addressed the spark arrestors, he commented he had a different
cap and wanted to make sure the DRB approved. The Board did not have a problem with the cap
as long as it met code. Valerie Feuer suggested changing the first condition to read trim colors
shall be consistent.
MOTION: Moved, seconded (Enger/Vogelsberg) and carried by a 5-0 vote to recommend
approval of OV13-99-52 T.J. Bednar Homes Model 1900/2202, Fairway Village & Copper
Ridge Estates II, subject to staff conditions and stipulating item one add trim colors shall
be consistent.
Staff Conditions:
1. The porpoise, Teal, and Cocoa trim colors shall be
consistent for Fairway Village.
2. Windows shall either be recessed or popped out, except where under a porch.
3. Spark arrestors shall be camouflaged with a cap.
4. Ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be enclosed by a wall to provide visual
screening and noise mitigation, and shall respect all setbacks.
OV12-99-08 ORO VALLEY RETAIL CENTER BLOCK 8 DEVELOPMENT PLAN
08-10-99 Development Review Board Minutes Page 7
Valerie Feuer introduced the staff report into the record. The subject property is 1.25 acres with
a 8,550 square foot building envelope. Located in Block 8 of the Oro Valley Retail Center;
abuted on the north by Wells Fargo Bank, to the southwest by Carl's Jr., and to the east by Oracle
Road. The development will have vehicular access off of the main parking area of the Oro
Valley Retail Center. The building provides 57 parking spaces, including 2 handicapped
accessible spaces.
Craig Civalier introduced the engineer's report into the staff record. Access will be provided by
an existing 24 ft wide PAAL that was constructed by the Target development to the interior road.
There are no off site flows that impact this pad. Runoff flows from this site will be conveyed
through the Carl's Jr.'s site, then through the Brake Max site to the historical discharge point.
This site was mass graded during the construction of the Target Site. Minor amounts of cuts and
fills will be necessary to adjust the site to finish grade.
Charles Hulsey, WLB Group, was present for questions. Member Glueck questioned the traffic
usage. Mr. Hulsey commented that the traffic use is calculated by the square footage and the
retail use, which comes under one classification.
MOTION: Moved, seconded (Vogelsberg/Enger) and carried by a 5-0 vote to recommend
approval of OV12-99-08 Oro Valley Retail Center Block 8 Development Plan
Planning Staff Conditions:
1. The development plan shall have one additional handicapped accessible space because
the plan has more than fifty spaces.
2. The proposed bicycle racks shall be moved to comply with ADA standards.
3. Specialty pavement illustrating the internal pedestrian circulation shall be shown on the
development plan and must be at least four feet wide.
4. A section of the sidewalk located at the northeast corner must be located within the
property lines of the subject parcel.
5. The following statement shall be added to general note 43: "The public art for this
project shall be approved prior to the approval of the building permit."
6. A twelve foot landscaped island should be added to block access from Car's Jr.
7. At least two ties to the boundary lines of this block to section or quarter section corners
must be shown on the development plan.
8. These conditions shall be addressed prior to submittal of the development plan for
Town Council.
08-10-99 Development Review Board Minutes Page 8
OV12-99-9 RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 10 PARCELS O&P PRELIMINARY
PLAT
Valerie Feuer introduced the staff report into the record. The proposed Preliminary Plat
presented by the applicant calls for 103 residential lots to be constructed on approximately 19
acres, with 7 acres of a riparian wash area being preserved as natural open space. A buffer yard
A is required along Desert Fairways Drive and Hidden Springs Drive, and while the applicant has
stated that they will provide the buffer yards, the buffer yards are not indicated on the plat. Staff
finds that the Rancho Vistoso NB 10 Parcels 0 & P preliminary plat is not in conformance with
the medium-density residential land use density designation of 2.1-5.0 dwelling units per acre;
however, the proposed development is permitted by the existing zoning. Staff recommends
approval, subject to conditions listed in Exhibit A. Valerie Fueuer commented she wanted to add
on to condition one first bullet to the end of the sentence subject to Planning and Zoning
Administator's interpretation.
Craig Civalier introduced the engineer's report into the record. Traffic will gain access to Rancho
Vistoso Blvd. Hidden springs Drive and to Moore Road via Desert Fairways Drive. The entire
site will be graded except for the existing wash in Common area "A". Five-year threshold
retention is required for the site due to its location in the Highlands Wash. These parcels will be
mass graded with the exception of the wash I common area "A" Rancho Vistoso PAD grading
standards applies to this site. No grading waiver is expected for this project.
Charles Hulsey, WLB Group, was present for questions. Mr. Hulsey stated there is a
disagreement of the buffer yards but has talked with staff and felt it could be resolved. Mr.
Hulsey briefly discussed the plans on the overview. He briefly reviewed the areas that are being
encroached on and commented that WLB is willing to work with staff on this issue. Chair Lewis
commented on the different buffer yards. She asked would the area behind the fences be
landscaped. Mr. Hulsey replied yes. Member Vogelsberg asked would a cross access be
required behind the development. Valerie Feuer replied yes.
MOTION: Moved, seconded (Mager/Enger) and carried by a 4-0 vote (Glueck abstained)
to recommend approval of OV12-99-9 Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 10 Parcels 0 & P
Preliminary Plat
Planning Staff Conditions:
1. The following items shall be resolved to the satisfaction of the Planning & Zoning
Administrator prior to scheduling this item for Town Council review:
• The design of the plat shall be modified to show the area for Buffer Yard "A"
along Hidden Springs Drive and Desert Fairways Drive as Common Area A.
The buffer yard shall not be part of the right-of-way or individual lot, subject
to the Planning and Zoning Administrator's interpretation.
08-10-99 Development Review Board Minutes Page 9
• The design of the plat and the general notes shall be modified to reflect the
permitted Medium Density Residential development standards under the
Rancho Vistoso PAD. This includes, but is not limited to a minimum lot size of
5000 square feet, and a rear setback of 10'.
• An area equal to that of the intrusion into the designated PAD open space shall
be set aside on-site as designated open space. The applicant shall provide Staff
with documentation indicating the total area of intrusion, and the total area of
new designated open space on-site.
• The applicant shall include the 15' apron area within the riparian habitat
conservation easement, as required by the OVZCR.
• The applicant shall submit a riparian habitat study and mitigation plan to
Staff for review, or shall modify the plat design to exclude the designated
riparian habitat areas and the required 15' apron area.
2. The PAD pedestrian trail in the wash shall be developed by the developer as a
`primitive' trail, field located through the wash to minimize disturbance of the existing
vegetation, and shall utilize trail markers throughout of a similar design to those used
at Catalina State Park. The Planning & Zoning Administrator shall review and
approve the field location and level of improvements for this trail.
3. An open access way shall be preserved between the cul-de-sacs at the ends of Streets
"B" & "H" and the adjoining arterial streets to promote pedestrian and bicycle access
to the development. Bollards and / or posts shall be utilized to prohibit access by
motorized vehicles.
4. Extraneous information on the plat shall be eliminated.
Engineering Conditions
5. Provide a copy of the soils report for this project.
6. The cul-de-sac on Streets "E" and "H" is over 600 feet long. Fire Marshal and Town
Engineer approval is required.
7. Show site visibility triangles at all road intersections.
8. Show arrow label for the tie dimension to the 1/4 corner of sections 25/26.
9. Provide soils report and the design criteria for the 2:1 slopes for the rear yards.
10. Include the 100-year flood elevations on the finish floor elevation table on sheet 6 of
6.
11. Label concentration point 6E on the plat.
08-10-99 Development Review Board Minutes Page 10
12. Show the scour holes at the outlets for all concentration points where the drainage
report has identified the need.
13. Show and dimension bank protection in the common area in conformance with the
revised drainage report.
14. Provide closure calculations of the boundary description to assure that the linear
boundary closes in 1/10000 of precision.
15. Label parcels 0 and P on the cover sheet of the plat.
16. Provide a traffic impact report for this project that analyzes trip generation rates,
trip distribution, capacity analysis and level of services evaluations.
OV12-99-10 RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 10 PARCEL N MODEL HOMES
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Valerie Feuer introduced the staff report into the record. The subject parcel is 4.56 acres and is
zoned for Medium Density Residential under the Rancho Vistoso PAD. Three common areas are
designed in this development plan; one buffering Rancho Vistoso Boulevard from the subject
parcel, one used for parking spaces, and one serving as another buffer and pedestrian path along
Hidden Springs Drive. Staff has evaluated the development against the General Plan policies and
finds that it complies with policy 4.2A, encourage the provision of a variety of housing choices
matched to employees within a reasonable proximity of employment sites.
Engineer's report: The development will access Hidden Springs Drive with a proposed public
street approximately 700 feet south of Vistoso Highlands Drive. Because of the small size of the
project, the engineer has proposed storing the post-development runoff in the Moore Road
Detention Facility. It will be mass graded. The extent cannot be determined from the
information provided. It is requested grading plans be submitted during the improvement plan
review. Planning staff recommends approval of the Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 10 Parcel N
Model Homes Development Plan, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit "A".
Charles Hulsey, WLB Group, representing Stone Crest Homes, was available for questions. He
also commented that there were no problems with the conditions except the buffer yard which he
felt could be worked out with Staff. Member Mager questioned condition 13. She wanted to
know if the detention facility would be used by other developers, also who owns the facility or
who is responsible for it. Mr. Civalier explained that eventually the detention facility would be
filled up and over used. He would like to have a summary table of what is going into it and how
much is left, so he will know when all the credits have been used up. Mr. Hulsey also
commented that the Town makes the determination of the governing of it or who is responsible.
08-10-99 Development Review Board Minutes Page 11
He stated that maintenance of the facility is the responsibility of the Home Owners Association.
Mr. Hulsey briefly showed the Board members on the overview where the facility was. Member
Mager asked Mr. Hulsey if he had a problem with adding additional language to condition 2
subject to Planning and Zoning approval. Mr. Hulsey replied he did not have a problem with
that additional language.
MOTION: Moved, seconded (Vogelsberg/Glueck) and carried by a 5-0 vote to recommend
approval of OV12-99-10 Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 10 Parcel N Model Homes
Development Plan.
Planning Staff Conditions:
1. The setbacks for the model homes must •comply with the MDR development
standards. The setbacks are: Front: 20 feet; Side: 5 feet or 0 feet for common wall
on zero lot line development; Rear: 10 feet
2. The required buffer yards shall be specified on the development plan. Streetscape
Buffer Yard C along Hidden Springs Drive and Buffer Yard D for the common area
along Rancho Vistoso Boulevard subject to Planning and Zoning approval.
3. The word "Public" is hidden under the name label for Stonecrest Place on the plans.
4. Provide a pavement design and soils report.
5. Provide precision of closure calculations for all linear boundary legal descriptions.
The error of closure must be less than 1/10,000.
6. The boundary calculations for the proposed Stonecrest Place due not match the
information shown on the plans. The information on the plans is incomplete.
7. Show sight distance triangles for Stonecrest Place on the plans.
8. The fire note appears twice on the general notes, please remove one of them.
9. A 10-ft access easement is required on one side of the drainage way between lot 1
and Common Area "A".
10. Show two ties to section or quarter corners.
11. Label the ROW width of Rancho Vistoso Blvd.
12. The fire marshal and OV Water District must approve the water main system.
13. Provide a summary of the capacity of the Moore Road Detention Facility which
08-10-99 Development Review Board Minutes Page 12
shows, in tabular form,what runoff is presently being conveyed to this site, what
projects in design are proposed to contribute flows and the amount of remaining
reserve capacity.
14. Provide a short form traffic impact analysis showing trip generation, distribution
and capacity analysis at the Hidden Springs Drive and Stonecrest Place intersection.
OV12-98-1A RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 11 STONE CANYON GOLF
COURSE TEMPORARY CLUBHOUSE AND RECREATION CENTER
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Valerie Feuer introduced the staff report into the record. Stone Canyon will be a private golf
course within a gated community. A temporary golf course clubhouse with associated parking
has been combined with the recreation area required by OVZCR for all subdivisions. The golf
course membership will be available to a limited number of Stone Canyon residents, while the
recreation area will be open to all Stone Canyon residents. The purpose of the golf course
overlay is to permit the development of golf courses while preserving and enhancing water
resources, scenic vistas, neighborhoods, property uses and values. The overlay zone identifies a
number of standards for gold course design and irrigation that must be met in order to obtain the
approval of a development plan for a golf course.
Craig Civalier introduced the engineer's report into the record. A 2 lane private road will provide
access to this site that is an extension of Hohokam Village Place. The proposed area street
network will have sufficient capacity to provide for an acceptable level of service. The Rancho
Vistoso PAD grading ordinance applies to this project. No information was given on the
development plan regarding exiting and proposed elevations. Therefore, grading limits could not
be determined sufficiently to comment on. Planning staff finds that the Stone Canyon Golf
Course Temporary Clubhouse and Recreation Area is in compliance with the General Plan policy
3.1F, maintain and enhance Oro Valley's residential/resort/recreation character.
Mr. Charles Hulsey, WLB Group, was present representing Vistoso Partners. Mr. Hulsey
provided and overview to show the DRB members where the clubhouse is located. He explained
that there are approximately 850 homes that will be a part of Stone Canyon. Only 400 hundred
of the homeowners will be allowed to join the Golf Course. Everyone will be a part of the
recreation center. The problem is that the parking at the Club House is for members only. We
are trying to work with staff on the parking spaces. WLB has no objections with staff conditions.
Member Mager asked how temporary is the clubhouse. Mr. Hulsey replied approximately two to
three years.
MOTION: Moved, seconded (Enger/Mager) and carried by a 5-0 vote (Underwood/Bell
absent)to recommend approval of OV12-98-1A Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 11 Stone
Canyon Golf Course Temporary Clubhouse and Recreation Center Development Plan,
subject to staff conditions.
,
08-10-99 Development Review Board Minutes Page 13
Planning Staff Conditions:
1. There shall be no encroachment into the dedicated natural open space, with the
exception of the areas identified on the development plan. A trample zone, not to
exceed 5 feet in depth, may be permitted.
2. Any significant changes to the approved development plan must be submitted and
reviewed by planning staff.
3. A rationale for the reduced number of parking spaces based on different times of use
must be provided for the Planning and Zoning Administrator's approval.
4. Minor revisions should be made to reduce the encroachment into the no-build areas,
and must be approved by the Planning and Zoning Administrator.
5. The size of the recreation area and the total number of dwelling units to be served
should be added to the general notes.
STAFF REPORT:
Valerie reminded the DRB members that a meeting has been set for August 31, 1999 a study
session on Site Planning, Design Guidelines, and Community Design Concepts. She wanted the
Board to know that the school district has decided to stick with the tile roof as the cost analysis
proved not be any cheaper. She also informed the DRB that the Payless Shoe Source sign was
turned down by Council. There will also be a site tour in September to take a look at the
Foothills Business Park and a subdivision at Oro Valley Country Club.
MOTION: Moved, seconded (Vogelsberg/Mager) and carried by a 5-0 vote
(Underwood/Bell absent) to adjourn the August 10th, 1999 Development Review Board
Meeting at 8:30 P.M.
Shirley Gay
DRB Clerk
.
ITEM IV
ORO VALLEY PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD
MEETING DATE: August 10, 1999
TO: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD
FROM: Dennis Silva, Jr., Planner I
SUBJECT: OV13-99-44 ORO VALLEY RETAIL CENTER BLOCK 8,ARCHITECTURE
BACKGROUND:
Seaver Franks Architects, representing the Barclay Group, request DRB recommendation for architectural
approval. The subject property is a 1.25 acre parcel with a 8,550 square foot building envelope, Building 8,
within the Oro Valley Retail Center. The subject property is abutted on the north by Wells Fargo Bank, to the
southwest by Carl's Jr., to the east by Oracle Road, and west by the main parking area of the Oro Valley Retail
Center.
SUMMARY:
The development will have vehicular access off of the main parking area of the Oro Valley Retail Center.
The building provides fifty-seven (57) parking spaces, including two (2) handicapped accessible spaces, 5-Class
I and 5-Class II bike racks, and a loading area.
The elevations submitted show the building from all four sides. The structure will be 25 feet high and the
architectural style may be described as a modified Territorial. Architectural elements include a flat roofline,
wainscot trim, concrete columns, and decorative moldings on each elevation. The architectural style matches
that of the other buildings fronting Oracle Road, but the color palette submitted differs. The colors of the
building must match the existing colors for the retail center.
GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE:
The proposed architecture for Block 8 complies with the Town of Oro Valley General Plan, and ensures that all
four sides of the building will be coherently designed and treated.
RECOMMENDATION:
Planning staff recommends approval of the proposed architecture for Block 8, subject to the conditions listed in
Exhibit"A".
Attachments:
1. Exhibit"A"
2. Reduction of proposed architecture
F:\ov\ov13\1999\13-99-44\ARCHDRBRPT.doc
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
OV13-99-44
ORO VALLEY RETAIL CENTER
BLOCK 8 ARCHITECTURE
1. The refuse dumpster shall be enclosed on three sides by a 6' masonry wall and plantings, and shall be
finished to match the architectural character of the project, as per OVZCR Sec. 9-110C. The color of
the masonry wall shall match the colors of the existing and adjacent structure(s).
2. Mechanical equipment, whether ground level or roof-mounted, shall be screened from public view and
designed to be an integral part of the building, as per OVZCR Sec.9-110H. The color of the screening
shall match the building.
3. Per the approved Oro Valley Retail Center Sign Package,the logo colors, which do not match the letters,
must be submitted for review to the DRB Agenda Committee.
4. The color of the flat roof portions must match the wall color.
c e tS h C(')LCY11 11A Q�.ti
tCv-
2
EAVER FRANKS
ARCHITECTS INC AIA
ROONEY RANCH PARCEL "D"
ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA
Proposed Retail Buildings for the Barclay Group Shop Building 8
PAINT COLORS
STUCCO & CMU
FIELD COLOR, SERVICE
DOORS and FRAMES
STUCCO TRIM/CORNICE
PRE—CAST CONCRETE
NOTE:
1. Storefront Framing to be standard Dark Bronze Anodized Finish.
2. Built—up roof coating color shall be similar to the stucco color, as
determined by available products.
3. Tile roofing color to match Fry's Store.
2552 N.Alvernon Way/Tucson,AZ 85712/FAX 795-9431/602 795-4000
+520-795-9431 SEAVER FRANKS ARCH 422 P01 DEC 07 '99 10:29
liri
SEAVERFRANKS
A R C H I T E S INC A I A
2552 N. Alvernon Way/Tucson, AZ 85712/FAX(520) 795-9431/(520) 795-4000 '
FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION
COVER SHEET
TO: Dennis Silva
COMPANY: Town of Oro Valley
FAX #: 742--• knz_
SENDER: CHUCK HAAK, PROJECT ARCHITECT
DATE: 12-7-99 TIME: 10:30 p.m.
Number of pages 2
including cover:
RE: Rooney Ranch, Building 8
COMMENTS:
Our client asked us to reduce the height of this building in order to keep costs in
line. We have reduced the height of the building 2'-0". These sketches reflect
that height reduction. The plan configuration and the architectural detailing of
the building have not changed.
Mike Soto in our office apparently spoke with you last week about this matter and
he expressed optimism that this could he handled as an administrative change.
Please review these sketches and let me know if they are acceptable.
If you need any additional information please don't hesitate to give me a call.
Thanks
r- i
. ?3'-0'
I ♦
,..i.
Elm i m 1 I■ 2`ram "'�� �
■i . 01 ■11•mei.11 i••1.�.1.._ 1■.■1 _.
+
@NOQTH ELEVATION N
m
0
Ill
A
?3'-m. 23'-eve
?3'-®'
23'-f�
''r J 211-4'r 1p--- �► m
70
in
3)
73
0 EAST ELEVATION _ 3 WEST ELEVAT ION
23'-®'
4.4..ff.....iTinci r in
CI _ ffric ' 1 - r
0.0 do,,,,„0•=4,,,e0Z ,21'-4 lit
N
N
Q SOO'II ELEVATION
m
N
b
m
n
m
ROONJEY-' RANCH em ., a!dR
� ANKS
aiiIILC) t\15 aD......enulir•.mml•W.0•NM lipill riMIIII
EGEr"MR 1,pass m
N
L J 0
Ri`
1
7 25'•0"AF.F. v25'O*A.F.F.
-2 r 1 \ /--4 [22'•0*AF.F. 2 r 1/ 4 / 22'(Y A.F.F.
\ [
; / 1t ,I/ � /O r� r 9
' r ) . /
I
I
9 ` .e"` , '®'fir
1 \ -1
i ,
6- 3 `-8 67/ �-4 1 8
EAST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION
25'-0"AF.F.
2 -1 25 0'AF f.4 22'-0"AF.F. 2 -1 .F. 4 22'-0"A f F.
/ r
/ / � '
�.an
1 �'�
1 1 F ,
�' i �J,'1 �"'1 '�� ' I 1 _,_, (� 1 i 1
�� �L I� 61 \.___3 O 8 6 1 \� 4
6 3 8 5
NORTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION
/ / `'--`, -1]
KEY NOTES
1 PAINTED STUCCO
2 EIFS CORNICE,PAINTED V3 PRE•FINSHED ALUMINIUM STOREFRONT 1� p��jE'f� 1d��� ❑
1L0lS� ---1
4 PAINTED METAL DOOR AND FRAME // f
A R C H I T E/t�T S INC AIA
5 PRE-CAST CONCRETE COLUMN AND BASE i ./
6 PAINTED STUCCO WAINSCOT MI N.ALY@HOW WAY/TIXIION.AZ an¢.FAX WS-W3/7194CCO
7 DECORATIVE METAL GRILLE
DATE:712.99
8 PRE-CAST CONC WAINSCOT
9 EIFS TRIM,PAINTED SCALEI/8 1'-0"
I l
- I'� F
ROONEY RANCH PARCEL 'D
ORO VALLEY , ARIZONA � -
PROPOSED RETAIL CENTER FOR THE BARCLAY GROUP , qP.
BUILDING 8 roi 1--I— O— io ID ' .Z
NORT+-i
FLOOR PLAN AREA:8.41S SF_
•
I 'iII I 4I k,
i. 1 ,,. 'N.z, is
- —.',..,, /AO 4, \ \
‘ \ \
. a t_ 44, \ \
I \ \
it II � •
II •1 I.
4II V A \
I II
fl II 1
�� it II
II II
111 11 11C% 1
1100 ii
11 11_ n II
lf( H 11
11 \
�((( gn., -r II 011 II \
I 1 11I
II 11 \
1 �
11) a ——— - -
I —0 \ t
(qk . —
to
1 C
I ® (.3
1 )
1
Is ® o
1 ...... \_...., ..._.., 0
,.., !,,
I
/,
• , . i
I ,Th, i �/
•
1
0 CD * * \\\\\\\\* \\\\
••
1 ...,,-/
. _______I ,
. •
SITE Pi...ANI
0 „, . ...„.,..„,.
NORT>-4
LLEY
o • y TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
' : COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
.4 r p- -Planning and Zoning • Buikling Safety
i' ,. • A. 11000 N.L.a Canada Dr1v �
e,Oro Valley,AZ t5737-(520)224• 0-Fax(S2A)742-1022
A '• •:A •Parks and Recreation
ev. •► . . .. C80 W.Gallo Co400rd14.Ora Volley.AZ 85737•(52e)229-5050-Fox(S20)79;-ZZ02
"QNDeo
12/19/01
Angcla Dotson
Project Coordinator
Bill Moore&Associates
P.O.Box 6153
Albany, CA 94706
Shanda Jackson
Ross Stores,Inc.
8333 Central Avenue
Newark,CA 94560-3433
Re: OV 13-99-44,Ross Architecture and Sign Applications,Rooney Ranch Center,Oro Valley
Ms. Dotson and Ms.Jackson,
On 12/11/01,the Development Review Board Agenda Committee considered your application for
sign approval and minor changes to the architecture. The following is a list of issues and
corresponding actions by the Committee:
,Architecture:
1. Addition of 3"niche.with a sand motif background enclosing the"ROSS DRESS FOR
LESS"sign
The Committee voted unanimously to deny this request. The niche would not be consistent
with the design of other stores in the center and it appears to be a component of the •
signage.
2. Addition of Blue Glazed Block Accent
Prior to the meeting,the Planning&Zoning Ariministrator de:etmined that the Blue
Glazing is a component of the signage—not the Architecture. The Committee concurred
with this determination.
3. Landscaping
The Committee inquired about the lack of landscaping along the from of the building.
Members wanted to know if landscaping and/or lattice work would be incorporated to
break up the linear expanse of blank walls. Apparently,this was discussed at a previous
Committee meeting with the project representatives.
• www.townoforovalley.cam
Ross Arch/Signage
Page 2
Signs:
I. "ROSS DRESS FOR LESS"
Shall consist of reverse channel letters,halo illumination and copper patina color only.
2. "ROSS"plaques(located an pillars)
The committee determined that the blue accent stripes would be considered part of the sign
and not an architectural feature. Based on this decision,the stripes would be prohibited.
Both logo's would be allowed to remain in R.oss's colors at 8.0 square feet each. Rooney
Ranch Sign Guidelines allows a maximum of 16.0 square feet far logo's. Both plaques
will maximize the sign allowance.
(I)one under canopy sign is also allowed but must be designed to match other existing
under canopy sips on site.
Tn closing,the revised drawings reflecting the new changes were submitted and have been
processed and approved as of 12-19-01. Adtecb Signs has been contacted that the permits for the
signs arc ready to be picked up. If you have any additional questions or concerns regarding the
above items,please feel free to contact Terrilyn Billings at 229-4852.
Sincerely,
Bayer Vella icrnlyn Billings
Senior Planner Zonin°Tech
Cc: Bryant Nodine,Planning&Zoning Administrator
Shirley Gay,Subdivision Coordinator
Dee Widero,Senior Zoning Inspector
F:\OV\OV13\1999\13-99-44\revised arch for ross.doc
MVITTIEITI
LEWIS Phoenix Office Tucson Office Las Vegas Office
40 North Central Avenue One South Church Avenue 3993 Howard Hughes Parkway
AND Phoenix,Arizona 85004-4429 Suite 700 Suite 600
ROCA Facsimile (602)262- 747 Tucson,Arizona 85701-1611 Las Vegas,Nevada 89109
Telephone(602)262-531 1 Facsimile (520)622-3088 Facsimile (702)949-8398 ��
L L P Telephone(520)622-2090 Telenhone(702)949-8200
LAWYERS
Frank S.Bangs,Jr.
Direct Dial:(520)622-2090
Direct Fax:(520)879-4701
Internet:FBangs@lrlaw.com
Admitted in Arizona
Our File Number 37886-00001
VIA FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION
AND FIRST CLASS MAIL
January 4, 2002
Mr. Bryant �`;illatiY1e
Planning & Zoning Administrator
Town of Oro Valley
11,000 North La Canada Drive
Oro Valley, Arizona 85737
Re: OV 13-99-44, Ross Architecture and Sign Applications, Rooney
Ranch Center; notice of appeal to Board of Adjustment
Dear Bryant:
Our firm represents Barclay Group ("Barclay"), the developer of the Rooney
Ranch Center(the "Center"). Barclay recently received from Ross Stores, Inc.
("Ross"), a tenant in the Center, the enclosed letter from Bayer Vella and Jerrilyn
Billings of your staff dated December 19, 2001. Based on your interpretation of
unidentified provisions of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised ("OVZCR"), that letter
takes the position that blue glazed accent tiles on the front facade of the Ross store are a
component of the building's signage, not its architecture. Following your
determination, the Agenda Committee of the Town's Development Review Board
("DRB"), concluded "... that the blue accent stripes would be considered part of the
sign and not an architectural feature. Based on this decision, the stripes would be
prohibited."
Subsequently, Barclay's contractor has received notification from the Town
that it will issue a stop work order on the Ross store if the blue accent tiles are not
removed. This letter is Barclay's notice of appeal from your decision to pursuant to
OVZCR § 1-706.
Barclay disputes your determination. The blue accent stripes have been
shown as part of the Ross store architecture since at least May of last year, when
Barclay submitted elevations of the store facade as part of the Ross store building plans.
Those plans were reviewed by the Town and approved on August 1, 2001. To now
describe this architectural element as "signage" is contrary to the OVZCR's definition
117313.1
LEWIS Mr. Bryant Nodine
AND January 4, 2002 Page 2
ROCA
-LLP-
LAWYERS
of"sign," § 2-101, inconsistent with the Town's past actions and grossly unfair to both
Barclay and Ross.
The Ross store is very close to completion and Barclay expects to seek
occupancy permits by January 29, 2002. A stop work order at this late date would
seriously jeopardize that schedule and result in significant financial damage to both
Barclay and Ross.
Even assuming, for sake of argument, that the Town can now ignore the
OVZCR, reverse its earlier determinations and call the accent stripes signage, it is
legally estopped frjin en oicing their reinoval through the issuance of the stop work
order. By the issuance in August 2001 of a valid building permit identifying the accent
stripes and Barclay's substantial reliance on that approval by the construction of the
building with the tile accents, Barclay has obtained a vested right to keep the tile accent
stripes, even if the Town has now changed its mind about their characterization.
Under OVZCR § 1-706 and state zoning enabling law, A.R.S. § 9-462.06(E),
this appeal stays all pending proceedings in the matter appealed from, including the
threatened stop order. We are collecting documents and expect to file an appeal to the
Board of Adjustment shortly. To that end, a copy of your written determination on
which the Agenda Committee of the DRB based its decision would be appreciated.
Sinc ly,
ra . ang r.
FSB/sdl
Enclosure
cc: Mr. Chuck Sweet, Town Manager
Mr. Brent Sinclair, Development Services Department
Mr. Terry Vosler, Building Official (via facsimile)
Dan L. Dudley, Esq., Town Attorney(via facsimile)
Mr. Trey Eakin, Barclay Group
Mr. Charles Haak, Seaver Franks
(All w/enclosure)
117313.1