Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOV139337 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY APPLICATION FOR PERMANENT SIGN APPROVAL DALE: OV CASE NO. : 0 1'gZ-T-1 (off ice use only) PROJECT NAME: S4a3Dte Vetuneta PROPOSE.►) SIGN LOCATION: Lk CA NIA1DPVL1en>A VrsTA Qaft_ SPEC MOD CA TI 2 F O N DE REQUESTED: SIZE SIZE REQUESTED: 2. 4 4 TtlttO 7_41, LOCATION LOCATION REQUESTED: GTEarEmR-mobtFIcATTsiN PLEASE EXPLAIN: REASON FOR REQUEST: i► OPEatrCIes APPLICANT: crAl -* I 1 , ADDRESS:y 6 ZO 0. IcsAS PHONE NO. :511•01 Oft PROPERTY OWNER: �►E ADDRESS: PHONE NO. : REQUIRED APPLICATION FEE - $150.00 PAID iiinta2 (date) SIGNAIURE:;K DATE: APPLICATION MUST RECEIVED 30 YS IN ADVANCEF THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING DATE. NC'ITE: A certified list of all property owners within 300 feet, made within 60 days of submittal, must be supplied at the time of application along with 10 copies each of the site plan and sketch plan for the proposed sign. At the meeting, a colored rendering of the sign must be presented for review. Qo o 1 2 ORO VALLEY PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT -57 lc"". OP"'"" tr(';1;siigAL .4 lb/ : DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD %. � 11661 FUNDED\ � MEETING DATE: December 14, 1993 TO: Development Review Board FROM: Steve Hagedorn, Director SUBJECT: OV 13-93-3* Saddle Valley II Permanent Sign BACKGROUND: Contravest Properties Incorporated, owners of the Saddle Valley II property which is located at the northeast corner of Linda Vista Road and La Canada Drive, is requesting permanent entry-way signs in two locations on their property. They are requesting approval of a project identification sign and entry- way sign at the northeast corner of Linda Vista Boulevard and La Canada Drive. The first entry-way sign is situated at the extreme southwest corner of their property and is being termed a signature rock by the owners. It consists of a large boulder with 12" carved letters identifying their project. Additional landscaping is included around the boulder (please refer to site plan). This sign will be lit at night through use of a ground-mounted spot light. The use of ground-mounted spot lights is permitted under the Town's new Sign Code provided that the lighting fixture be shielded in accordance with the Oro Valley lighting code and screened from public and private right-of-ways. The location of this particular ground-mounted spot light appears to be visible from both Linda Vista and La Canada Drive. Therefore, staff would recommend that if this particular lighting type is used and approved by the Development Review Board this evening, that a requirement be made that it be fully shielded and screened from view through the use of additional landscape materials. As proposed,this ground-mounted spot light sits at the northern edge of a planing of dahlia gregii and lantana. The color of the carved letters is not specified on this development plan. The permitted colors under the new Oro Valley Sign Code are rust, sand, beige and brown. The Development Review Board and the applicant need to specify and agree on a color for the carved letters. The second entry-way sign is located at the northeast corner of Linda Vista Road and Preakness Place at the main entrance into this project. This particular sign will be constructed of concrete masonry units with a sand-finished stucco painted beige in color. The height of this entry-way wall is 5' and its length is 18'. The overall square footage of the sign area on this entry wall is 24 sq. feet with 16" black wrought-iron letters attached. This signage wall conforms with the requirements of the Sign Code for entry-way wall signage, however, the black wrought-iron letters are not permitted. The color black is not a permitted color under the Sign Code. Again, those colors are limited to rust, sand, beige and brown. The Development Review Board and the applicant need to agree on one of those colors for the wrought-iron lettering. This sign will also be lit at night through the use of two ground-mounted flood \data\wp\ovcases\13-93-36\DRB-12-14.rpt lights. Both of these lights appear to be visible from the right-or-ways of both Linda Vista and Preakness Place. A condition for approval should be that these ground-mounted floodlights be fully shielded and fully screened from the view of the right-of-way through the use of plant material. RECOMMENDATION: Planning staff would recommend approval of both of these signs to be used at the Saddle Valley II project with the following conditions. 1. The color of the lettering on both signs needs to be agreed on between the Development Review Board and the applicant. The permitted colors under the code are rust, sand, beige and brown. 2. All ground-mounted flood lights need to be fully shielded and screened from the view of the right-of-way through the use of additional plantings. Attachments: Development Plan £\data\wp\ovcases\13-93-36\DRB-12-14.rpt 2 12-14-93 Development Review Board Meeting Minutes Page 10 approval to indicate that there should only be one bar? Mr. Coutts said that is correct. Mr. McGann said this whole issue had evolved and finally we are coming to some resolution as to how this should be dealt with and consistency is important and he agreed with Mr. Coutts that one horizontal member or cable to support the net be a condition of this approval. Mr. McCann then MOVED to APPROVE OV13-93-6 Toutant request for extension of golf safety net - Canada Hills, Village 11, Lot 12 with the condition included in staff's report that: 1) poles be painted to match the color of the structure; and 2) the calculations be resubmitted for review by the Town based on the adjusted height; and 3) the structure be modified to include only one horizontal cross member or replace the member with a cable to support the net. Mr. Coutts SECONDED. Mr. Kautenburger said Mr. Toutant has two horizontal bars at this time, if he is to take out the top horizontal bar and put in a cable would that be ok? Or does he have to move that horizontal bar up? Mr. McGann said that would conform with the conditions to replace the bar with a cable. Mr. Coutts asked staff in order to be fair to the Toutant's if the motion presented was rejected would they have the ability to go to the Mayor and Council and appeal the decision and the manner in which we are posing this is an amended proposal, do they still have the ability to go before Council and have council make the final decision and modify the decision of the DRB? Mr. Chatfield said it is my interpretation that they would have that appeal available to them because the approval would not be in the same format that they had requested. MOTION CARRI H-fl 3-1. OV13-93-37 SADDLE VALLEY II PERMANENT SIGNS The staff report was read by Don Chatfield. Mr. Chatfield said the applicant visited his office, this date, and apologized that he would not be able to be present at this evening's meeting and he delivered two renderings that show both the signature sign, the boulder sign, and the monument sign (these renderings were displayed) . He indicated that the color for the carved signature sign (the boulder sign) would be brown and he also agreed that the iron letters for the monument sign would also be changed from black to brown in order to meet the Town Sign Code. Mr. Kautenburger had a question for staff regarding the screening. Mr. Chatfield said the applicant was open to meeting both of the conditions to agree to the brown that is permitted under the Sign Code for colors; and, to provide the additional plantings to screen the lights. 12-14-93 Development Review Board Meeting Minutes Page 11 Mr. McGann asked staff if the boulders were real. Mr. Chatfield said yes, he did not want to make the applicant's presentation for them but what the applicant was trying to achieve was a similar feature to the one at Ventana Canyon where a rock is taken and sand blasted to cut the letters into it and highlight it with paint in the interior of the carving. Mr. McGann had a question for staff regarding the flood lights, the plans read shielded fixtures that shine onto the face. Mr. Chatfield said his interpretation is that two boulders, that are in the front are the lower lying ones and the one towards the back is the taller one with the carving in it. Mr. McGann asked staff about the comments relating to the screening of the fixtures and would this be in addition to the shielding? Mr. Chatfield said that's correct, this is in order to screen the view of the fixture itself. Mr. McGann asked staff if they had received color samples on the secondary sign? Mr. Chatfield said no, we have not. In fact, we had the discussion with the applicant in the afternoon about 4:00 p.m. and the applicant said he would agree to any color the DRB specifies. There were no color samples available. Mr. Coutts asked staff if they felt capable in choosing a brown (color) ? Mr. Chatfield said he would rather the applicant come in with the color sample and continue this to the next meeting so that we have a pallet to look at. He said he spoke to the applicant regarding the color and the applicant said he would prefer to see it approved this evening but if that was something the board wanted to see the applicant would be happy to provide that for the January meeting. Mr. Coutts said the applj.cant can go ahead with the basic carving of the stone and asked the board if they would like to continue this item. Mr. McGann MOVED to CONTINUE OV13-93-37 Saddle Valley II permanent signs to the next regularly scheduled meeting. Mr. Coutts SECONDED. MOTION CARRIED 4-0. OV12-93-15 DESERT WILLOWS TOWWNHOMES, LOTS 1-3 0, PRELIMINARY PLAT OV12-93-15 DESERT WILLOWS TOWNHCMES, LOT 1-30, PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN The staff report was read by Don Chatfield. Hank Bowers, Bowers Properties, was present. Mr. Coutts said the question I have for you is when you begin this development - 0V13-93-37 Duplicated plans from 12-14-93 DRB meeting I- ' M . 45ADOLE .,,,,„.. o•:_!' _ VALLEY __ - 1►1=tll_1►i=111=III_111=111_IIl—1►1=M=tn=It1=til=ttti3jlt=r(=1tit-lt.Eill it_ lti=+tt :tn_Ili"=tlt • .•.1.-F.. / 1. i . 41 j I -`•+oo:E u.eY 4/ jt At-_Ut;attt_(;l_ iiC=lttttsit:a:ok-rt(1u(_t11=j1ia1lt=tlt-ill=ttt_1\t= 1} tt:.11lstt(�tl^ INlett\SI;1Nw-tIt=.ltrattlu-)(1:=1,t.---;11�q�t\1-t‘1",\\.=Tii". -• _- 'o, a LA CANADA / LINDA VISTA INTERSECTION , LANDSCAPE -SIGNATURE ROCI;• LIGHTING 4 SADDLE VALLEY ENTRANCE OFF LINDA VI S iA - S LANDSCAPE - SIGN- LIEo-1TINq Ac-, ME5a.ut E ( ) /OCOTILLO (2) • 0 20' SEr Sft.K VPem/ < 4k ASSORTED $OULDERS -DALE A ,R1=GGI •• • J ►JESEtzT SPcx N (Z) LANTANA S1niECT ACACIA (3) ' •-'UCLA ELA'TA ,•1 \ SALVIA 4071.,. Ni-. 4A,,-.4. 4� S1C�NArURE 516N �-'' -FA,,„ DuSTE R (-) �! 0;ri I,.rnf.m.ii:i3;..-.4, P a5....410‘.-4.t.7,i__t lithx ....\ >ir'\,',"--/ /,—..\-- • — ,, A01fiir i„..4.--:*) -4/C O1 41 1O1 1 . 7_fI:P4_4.l4,1 1Ii_11.t1.l1.%_lr.17_ t_i fit1 ® MESQUITE (3) . •/ • �• _ (XCtTILLO W R '' 1OODL5 (4> • . a c: ›-----------. -OALEA 6REG6l I • LANTANAA., AO LIS . 5' 51 A-TURE ROCK WITH IV CA ç \ wJQ - , • - _______-_ 41kOn ! 12.CARvED LETTERS. .. - 1 • 1___...,i0 ••�? � ''t j,3, I ` at F • It zii,\ -- -- -sv^.e• izr ..:). C) `2)�` ��1k FL.' S21 .e 4._11 LINDA V(STh ...- �-•---* jili ^I LINDA VISTA ��� O-EY " /4 (% a 9.;,„y7W*l :"r "F.M. !/ O e,x ° r a49 ;, q ��� �1 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA 85737 Administrative Offices(602)297-2591 Fax(602)297-0428 pOVNDEO�g'l January 11, 1994 via facsimile machine Mr. Wayne Volls Contravest, Inc. RE : OV 13-93-37 Saddle Valley Permanent Sign Approval Dear Mr. Volls: This letter shall confirm that the Planning and Zoning Director has given permission for you to proceed with wall construction, landscaping, setting the stone, etc. as related to the permanent signage for Saddle Valley. As we discussed, you need only refrain from applying the sign text until the DRB has approved your colors and you have reached an agreement with the board as to the amount of landscaping required to screen the light fixture(s). We apologize that your case was accidentally omitted from the January llth DRB agenda and we thank you for your understanding. We promise that you will be the number one item on February 8th's agenda. (Steve and Don are both of the opinion that, even if we get the list of approved colors from DRB as a result of tonight's meeting, the minor landscape issue will still have to be decided upon in open meeting.) Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, Linda Mason-Frew Post-It''brand fax transmittal memo 7671 #of pages ► Planner I ._.,..- •_ _ '� 1111 • Town of Oro Valley c c o. Dept. Phone# Fax# 1 Fax# c `J 2230 ORO VALLEY PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING DATE: February 8, 1994 TO: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD FROM: Linda Frew, Planner I SUBJECT: OV 13-93-37 Saddle Valley II Permanent Sign BACKGROUND: The Development Review Board reviewed and, essentially, approved a sign package for two permanent entry-way signs for the above-referenced project, one at the northeast corner of Linda Vista/La Canada Drive and one for the main project entry at Linda Vista/Preakness Place. A representative from Contravest, Inc., the project developer, will be on hand to present the proposed color for the sign text to appear on both signs. Mr. Wayne Voelz of Contravest has already assured the Town Staff that he is willing to use any color which appeals to the DRB on the signs. The DRB members may wish to refer to the Pantone Matching System booklet to assist in determination of the appropriate color (Mr. Chatfield can supply this at the meeting). RECOMMENDATION: • Staff would recommend that final approval be given to the sign package presented for Saddle Valley II, with the stipulation that the DRB approve the choice of color for the sign text. Attachments: 1. Sign package plans 13-93-37\color.rpt ORO VALLEY PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING DATE: March 8, 1994 TO: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD FROM: Linda Frew, Planner I SUBJECT: OV13-93-37 Saddle Valley II Permanent Signs BACKGROUND: At the December, 1993 meeting, the Development Review Board reviewed and approved a sign package for two permanent entry-way signs for the above-referenced project, one at the northeast corner of Linda Vista/La Canada Drive and one for the main project entry at Linda Vista/Preakness Place. One question remained, however, the color of the sign text and the case was continued to give the developer an opportunity to decide on his color palette. Mr. Wayne Voelz, a representative from Contravest, Inc., the project developer, was present at the January meeting but, due to the lengthy agenda, this matter was not discussed. At that meeting, however, the DRB approved a palette of acceptable colors to be used on all permanent and temporary signs. Mr. Voelz, has made a selection from the DRB-approved palette, a brown tone, no. 492C, and he requests that this color be approved for use on the two permanent entry-way signs for Saddle Valley II. RECOMMENDATION: Staff would recommend that final approval be given to the sign package presented for Saddle Valley II, with the stipulation that color no. 492C from the DRB-approved color palette be used for the signage text. Attachments: 1. Sign package plans 13-93-37\color.no2 OU/3rl�3 MAY 9 REC'D gwat SOUTHWEST GAS CORPORATION May 5, 1994 Mr. Jim DeGrood Town Engineer, Oro Valley 11000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley, AZ 85737 RE : Logan' s Crossing Dear Mr. DeGrood: Please be advised that Southwest Gas Corporation has completed its installation of natural gas facilities at Logan' s Crossing. The necessary facilities for the furnishing of gas service to this area are presently available under the company' s conventional line extension policies . If you need any further information, please feel free to call me at 794-6427 . Sincerely, Lorri Graham Senior Account Representative mr 3401 E. Gas Road / P.O. Box 26500 / Tucson, Arizona 85726-6500 / 602/889-5600 41/10 p-v i 3 -S1 -3-1 MAY 9 REC'D 111•1IVEST° May 6, 1994 COMMUNICATIONS Mr. Jim Degrood Town of Oro Valley 11000 North La Canada Drive Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 Saddle Valley II/Oro, Valley, Arizona You have requested a letter from U S WEST Communications, Inc. concerning the availability of telephone service to the development described as follows: Saddle Valley II , a residential development located in a portion of the SW 1 /4, Section 14, T-12-S, R-13-E, G&SRM, Pima County; consisting of 54 lots . The following information is provided in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Office of Interstate Land Sales Registration, Section 1710. 105, Part VIII , Subparagraph D: 1 . The above described property is within the operating area of U S WEST Communications which is subject to regulation by the Arizona Corporation Commission and the Federal Communication Commission. 2. Telephone service is provided pursuant to the terms, conditions , rates and charges, including Zone Connection Charges , where applicable, as set forth in Telephone Company tariffs on file with the applicable regulatory agencies and will be provided to the above described property in accordance with said tariffs upon applications being made therefore; provided the developer furnishes trenching and/or conduit for the placement of telephone facilities. Furthermore, said facilities will be extended on a contractual basis. Questions regarding extension of facilities should be directed to an Outside Plant Engineer on (602) 292-8157. L evelopment nt 20 East Thomas Road, Sta ion 18C48 Phoenix, Arizona 85012 gm cc: Wayne Voelz-Contravest DSDC-Tucson Metro (TNO - SFU) (2120394064)