Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
OV139890
Sep-30-98 04: 19P Town c►f Orn Valley 520 74? 102? P_O1 TOWN Oi OR() V A I.I 'v APDI.Yt'r"T'10N FOP DEVET,()' ,t ,NT REVIEW -ROJECT ARCH i T L'"T ,,RE DATE: CV CASE E NO "'ler .1Z), )((oft i PROS ECTPen5,19q". ,V4iC6 fC - - LOCATION - A?f7 i / 'r �� A P D .T CANT 4,44 :444/01K ADDRESS • esiel &P 7‘-t— es ..*4e3 TELEPHONc NO ob2. tCc(/ q(259, PROPERTY OWNER - /411e,/L.- /45- , r-I hi — ADDRESS PHONE NO - -- _ PROJECT ARCHITECT/E•:NGTNFEEl /�V �.t 4ZeitiMVS ADDRESS : wG "!ems , *pet"1tk'!-�/ _ C I2. g' ` L DEVELOPMENT REV 1 FW B AK INC i)ATE; $ d\h `J l'Y 9- w -- /497/...,(5 _— S TCNATi�u�~ : .! DATE : NOTE: This av nl i cation must- be ac.comoan l •c: by the required $1 `;o . oo �e e p� � pl alks , 11 " x 1 in size , each : . (. _ .zce and twelve cry e.� c�� t~ .�_ ! � to �.-•} dimensioned eievat :on al L s' ► jctu r e ,Pon all four sides a;'d cooy of the proj ect. ' s site plan . The submit t ,:1 must also i ncludo <i :proposed color palette for the project i r: an 8 . 5 " x 11" format. , to include color chips of body and trim : 'l ors ,i id ti l e color and style, if app i i c Ahl e . Building square f ootac; is also required AT' THE MEETING, appl i.c';:rlt s must have on hand for presentation, colored perspective" or rendered elevations of di ! four , .ties of the structures . SUBMITTALS MUST BE RI-IFTVED HY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AT LEAST 18 CALENDAR DAYS TN ADVANCE OF THE I)E: I N` I) DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD HEARING DATE_ ` - ,rL' YAIVE6 Q ���r CCTr- 1998 � Fax Nate A78/3 Tmo'n nro Valle�r "it*Ck24‘' 1°R%-) -(kt,3 "4-yx.xri Nn., Y ORO VALLEY PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING DATE: November 10th, 19 ` ."111.14.11"11.1"4"111117 Date TO: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARDProjevi,/e.,,{ r Y�.O • GY iC� ylo l �� FROM: David Marsh Planner I Cc, O -= BA.D SUBJECT: OV13-98-90 Albertson's Store,Fuel Center, and In-Line Shops Architecture av4 BACKGROUND: Seaver-Franks, representing the developers, request DRB approval of an architectural submittal for an Albertson's Store and Fuel Center, and In-Line Shops. The proposed buildings will be part of the Rooney Ranch Parcel B Development Plan, also reviewed by the DRB this evening. The 17.63 acre property is located on the west side of Oracle Road, north of N. First Avenue, and is designated "Town Commercial Center" use under the Rooney Ranch PAD. The property is abutted on the north by the Foothills wash, to the east by Oracle Road, to the south by N. First Avenue, and to the west by the C.D.O. wash. The architecture for this project was previewed to the DRB at its October 13th, 1998 meeting. SUMMARY: The architecture presented for this project may be described as Mission in style, with several Contemporary Southwestern accents, and is similar to the architecture approved for the Oro Valley Retail Center. There are three proposed structures as part of this submittal: an Albertson's store, an Albertson's fuel center, and in-line commercial stores attached to the Albertson's store. Each of these will be described in detail below. The proposed Albertson's store will face Oracle Road, and will feature 57,560 square feet of commercial space, and a 5,000 square foot garden and patio sales area. The architecture of this building features numerous elements, including arcading, columns, archways, parapets, glass entry features, and a prominent entryway. The entryway possesses significant vertical architectural features, such as archways, columns, masonry `caps' to the towers, an inset window, and serves to `break up' the massing of the building. A side entrance to the garden and patio sales area is also provided, and the area is enclosed by a 6' wrought iron fence. The height of the proposed building will be vary from 28' to 30', with 35' being the maximum for the entryway feature. The maximum height allowable by the PAD is 33'; however significant vertical architectural features are allowed to exceed this limitation. The in-line stores continue many of the architectural features of Albertson's, most notably the prominent masonry-capped towers at the western corners of the building. 16,644 square feet of small commercial store area is provided, including an arcade with a pedestrian area on the east and southern sides of the structure, facing Oracle Road and North First Avenue. The roofline of the building includes a 12' recess approximately 19' above grade, thus reducing the apparent mass of the building. The building also features columns, architectural inserts, glass entry ways and display windows, and will have a maximum proposed height of 26', 32' including the towers. The rear elevation of both the j ; stores and Albertson's,which will fa le CDO wash and N. First Avenue, features a variety of architectural elements. The utilization of these elements, which include a tower, column elements, corbels, and parapets, will improve the appearance of the building, break up its `massing', and mitigate the visual impacts of the structure. The rear of the building will further be screened by elements of the landscape plan, and Staff has requested that an archway be added to one of the loading areas to mitigate its appearance (see Condition#1). The submittal also includes an Albertson's fuel center, to be located adjacent to the Bank of America, facing Oracle Road. The fuel center features elements of Mission architectural style, including columns, recessed window areas, and masonry parapet trim, mimicking the style found on the Albertson's store proper. The structure is below the 25' maximum height permitted for structures within 100' of Oracle Road, as per the Rooney Ranch PAD. A portion of the architectural trim, the masonry cap found on the front and rear façade, barely exceeds the 25' height limit, which is permitted in the PAD. A color palette and samples for this submittal will be provided for review at the DRB meeting. GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE: The architecture complies with General Plan policy 9.1A, that "building height and bulk should be in harmony with individual site attributes" and 9.1 F, that building's should be "coherently designed and treated". RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval, finding that the architecture is consistent with that constructed in the Oro Valley Retail Center, and that the level of architectural detailing provided will enhance the streetscape. SUGGESTED MOTION: The Development Review Board may wish to consider one of the following motions: I move to approve OV 13-98-90 Albertson's Store, Fuel Center, and In-Line Shops Architecture, with the conditions stated in Exhibit"A", attached herewith. OR I move to approve OV 13-98-90 Albertson's Store, Fuel Center, and In-Line Shops Architecture, with the conditions stated in Exhibit"A", attached herewith., and the following additional conditions OR I move to deny OV 13-98-90 Albertson's Store,Fuel Center, and In-Line Shops Architecture, finding that: Attachments: 1. Exhibit"A"—Conditions for Approval 2. Reduced Building Elevations F:\OV\OV 13\1998\13-98-90\ARCHDRB.RPT 2 EXHIBIT"A" CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL OV13-98-90 ALBERTSON'S STORE, FUEL CENTER,AND IN-LINE SHOPS ARCHITECTURE 1. An arch, in the same style and manner as found at the Pizza Hut-Burger King, shall be added to the entrance of the loading area found between Albertson's and the in-line stores. 2. Signage for this project is not part of this submittal, and will require separate review for conformance to the sign regulations for Area B of the Rooney Ranch PAD. 3. The color palette for this project shall be compatible with that used for the Fry's and Oro Valley Retail Center developments. 3 ORO VALLEY PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING DATE: December 8th, 1998 TO: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD FROM: David Marsh, Planner I SUBJECT: OV13-98-90 Albertson's Fuel Center Architecture BACKGROUND: Seaver-Franks, representing the developers, request DRB approval of an architectural submittal for an Albertson's Fuel Center. The proposed building will be part of the Rooney Ranch Parcel B Development Plan, reviewed by the DRB on November 10t", 1998. The 17.63 acre property is located on the west side of Oracle Road, north of N. First Avenue, and is designated "Town Commercial Center" use under the Rooney Ranch PAD. The property is abutted on the north by the Foothills wash, to the east by Oracle Road, to the south by N. First Avenue, and to the west by the C.D.O. wash. The architecture for this structure was removed from DRB review at the November 10th, 1998 meeting due to a delay of gas station development rights for the Rooney Ranch Area B PAD Amendment; however, gasoline station development rights for this structure will be re-examined by Town Council on December 2nd, and the DRB will be advised of their decision. SUMMARY: The architecture presented for this project may be described as Mission in style, with several Contemporary Southwestern accents, and is similar to the architecture approved for the Oro Valley Retail Center,the Albertson's store proper, and in-line shops proposed for this development. The proposed Albertson's fuel center will be located adjacent to the Bank of America, facing Oracle Road. The fuel center features elements of Mission architectural style, including columns, recessed window areas, and masonry parapet trim, mimicking the style found on the Albertson's store proper. The structure is below the 25' maximum height permitted for structures within 100' of Oracle Road, as per the Rooney Ranch PAD. A portion of the architectural trim,the masonry cap found on the front and rear façade, barely exceeds the 25' height limit, which is permitted in the PAD. The 21' high canopy does exceed the 18' maximum height permitted in the OVZCR, and Staff has placed as a Condition of Approval that the canopy be no higher than 18' (see Condition#3). A color palette and samples for this submittal will be provided for review at the DRB meeting. GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE: The architecture complies with General Plan policy 9.1A, that "building height and bulk should be in harmony with individual site attributes" and 9.1F, that building's should be "coherently designed and treated". RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval, with the conditions in Exhibit 'A' attached herewith, finding that the architecture is consistent with that constructed in the Oro Valley Retail Center, and that the level of architectural detailing provided will enhance the streetscape. Attachments: 1. Exhibit"A"—Conditions for Approval 2. Reduced Building Elevations F:\OV\OV 13\1998\13-98-90\ARCHDRB 1.RPT 2 , EXHIBIT "A" CONDITIONS FOR APPROVtiL, OV13-98-90 ALBERTSON'S FUEL CENTER ARCHITECTURE 1. Signage for this project is not part of this submittal, and will require separate review for conformance to the sign regulations for Area B of the Rooney Ranch PAD. 2. The color palette for this project shall be compatible with that used for the Fry's and Oro Valley Retail Center developments. 3. As per Sec. 9-108D of the OVZCR,the canopy shall not exceed 18' in height. 4. As per Sec. 9-110 H.1 &H.2,mechanical equipment shall be screened from public view and designed to be perceived as an integral part of the building, and all electrical meter and service components shall be screened from public view and painted to match the exterior color of the building. 3 r w' aP uJ. --II P u, wn.na+w�w YP ....� .aye �.wr.�aa. _ -IIP AN. lii�i�l�lfi�l�i�� < ,. IiiiIiIiIIi` maim' Yam.,. T 9 S, b qy$ R !, - phl�ii,�+i� aft ILYV.WVe1Y7 j ✓ t `.,'i • R "' �' IVV,�' .. .. .. .o-, .� �+ FOOD `� �■ �ARMAcr 11'BANK G. -k +g,._,, -,►-,4, l� ..� �x l�/ t2 11= aill ___ ■6a6■_.-- _■- �.: a-_�r - ll„ �r; _ f T,� .I i■Is�■1r�. 50 _Ilr,i,. _. --��-,— �.��I � ■r■ .. \ +r� 1�r� .ICI■�I 1�1 �1 � 1! n ' l EMIT imq! milimlm l ■U:�■I ■■�■ — �I±Ir�..� ira......„,,,I, �p�,u7 — ■_i�Ji� SOUTH ELEVATION ms 1 1 , M i --• `: 1 iii it r,, 1,; �■ = ■■ �■■n ■■� ■i IilI i til i p mi■■■■ IM 7■. j( MII]ln1I'■I IZIM�IIIIMENIIINNEIJlP■ENS� iMI:■7■ 11i II ,e .w•mi !I. ■ ,■ ■Ii■ U1■• nr1 1orl al ui..•.l■■mp.• IU WEST ELEVATION 10w1. -YP AII. f I:' ! / Put. -..i. Y I l r �'i lfff'fG ltltlJr +fir,, , h; .,. ] 1.. 1 , • ' b NORTH ELEVATION ROONEY RANCH PARCEL 'B' KEY NOTESco 9 RE K ORO VALLEY , ARIZONA 2 PANTED CMU 11 PANTED METAL W. AND FRAME ~,•< �SEAVal I RANKS 3 ER CORNICE „ CONCRETE CURB wAu SASE .<.,.�. AIA ♦ BPS RIM 12 PRECAST CONCRETE COLUMN AND BASE PROPOSED RETAIL CENTER FOR THE BARCLAY GROUP S ►ATINACOPPERCORNRI 13 RECAST CONCRETE WAINSCOT 6 PATINA COPPER COLUMN 10001 u PANTED STUCCO RASTERS 7 PAINTED METAL CIBEE /S PATINA COPPER WALL SCONCE DATE:10.13.98 B PRE-FINSHED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SCALE 3/32,T.0 • LOADING ^ LOADING J - El) - • - i j 1111 SHOPS ALBERTSONS ________ I SEASONAL SALES jJ II f FLOOR PLAN -III ROONEY RANCH PARCEL 'B' wICMIT,CTS fIA � INC1MC Atw VlvwiTWul•t wiTY�ti it•ti ORO VALLEY , ARIZONA PROPOSED RETAIL CENTER FOR THE BARCLAY GROUP DATE:1013.98 SCALE 1/16'=1'•0' -1 , le,A.I. 4 .. ftgail �v +�� r, li� ll �e� TIC 4 4 -o SOUTH ELEVATION (NORTH ELEVATION SIMILAR) WEST ELEVATION (EAST ELEVATION SIMILAR) r- - - - — -- ■ I1ELISUND ISLAND IIII L_ - CMIpPY A unar.MOPE FLOOR PLAN i._. g� GY NOTES C ,,-..'• ROONEY RANCH PARCEL 'B' ,> KEY NO STUCCO 9 PREi1N91ED METAL FENCING 2 PANTED CMU 10 PAN F l PANTED METAL DOOM AND FRAME FRANKS l FIFS CORNICE 11 CONCRETE CUR!WALL MSE ORO VALLEY , ARIZONA >1 'y ®° `'i • 4 EIFS FRIEZE 12 PRECAST CONCRETE COLUMN AND EASE /IAA� �. PROPOSED RETAIL CENTER FOR THE BARCLAY GROUP 5 PATINA COPPER CORNICE 13 PRE AST CONCRETE WANSCOT /�W�.l� 1 ALBERTSONS FUEL CENTER 7 PATINA COETAL COMLLE !LOCK 145 PANT®STUCCO ALL SUERS W 10' j 7 PAINTED METAL GRILLE 1s PATINA COPPER WALL SCONCE DATE:1613.98 � ��= IS PRE-FINSNED ALUMINIUM STOREFRONT SCALE3/32'=1'O ct ORO VALLEY PLANNING &ZONING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING DATE: December 8th, 1998 , 0 ,_ (iv (mid 100014 TO: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD eir"a FROM: David Marsh,Planner I F -.�•. ItJUkZOo UN,:�„i•tu::e.� :: SUBJECT: OV13-98-90 Home Depot Store and Garden Center Architecture BACKGROUND: Greenberg-Farrow, representing the developers, request DRB approval of an architectural submittal for an Home Depot store and Garden Center. The proposed building will be part of the Rooney Ranch Parcel B Development Plan, reviewed by the DRB on November 10th, 1998. The 17.63 acre property is located on the west side of Oracle Road, north of N. First Avenue, and is designated "Town Commercial Center" use under the Rooney Ranch PAD. The property is abutted on the north by the Foothills wash, to the east by Oracle Road, to the south by N. First Avenue, and to the west by the C.D.O. wash. SUMMARY: The proposed Home Depot store has a floor area of 105,580 square feet, with a 24,000 square foot Garden Center immediately adjacent. The architecture presented for this project possesses several Contemporary Southwestern accents, and is similar to that approved for the Oro Valley Retail Center. The architect has proposed a series of archways, parapets, architectural detail inserts, and a significant entry archway to reduce the bulk and massing of the building, and mitigating visual impacts. The archways on the front of the building form an `arcade', which will serve a dual purpose of adding architectural variety, while providing a screened, easily identifiable area for the outdoor display of items to occur. A large `porte-cochere' is also located on the front of the building, allowing for a covered `drive up' pickup area for lumber and other heavy materials. The rear (north) elevation features a series of archway accents, parapets, and architectural inserts. The west elevation adjoins the Albertson's store, and the east elevation is largely occupied by the Garden Center. The proposed structure will also include a Garden Center, which will feature column and 'cap' architectural elements, canvas `tent' roofing for the nursery area, and a 22' high black plastic coated chain link fence. The heights proposed for the structures are permitted in Area B of the Rooney Ranch PAD. The Home Depot store proper has a height of 32' to top of parapet, with 36' to top of the corner tower elements, and 40' to the top of the entry archway and tower element. The Garden Center will have a maximum height of 24'. A color palette for these structures will be presented to the DRB at the meeting. GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE: The architecture complies with General Plan policy 9.1A, that "building height and bulk should be in harmony with individual site attributes" and 9.1F, that buildings should be "coherently designed and treated". RECOMMENDATION: - Staff recommends approval, finding that the architecture is consistent with that constructed in the Oro Valley Retail Center, and that the level of architectural detailing provided will enhance the streetscape. SUGGESTED MOTION: The Development Review Board may wish to consider one of the following motions: I move to approve OV 13-98-90 Home Depot Store and Garden Center Architecture, with the conditions stated in Exhibit"A", attached herewith. OR I move to approve OV13-98-90 Home Depot Store and Garden Center Architecture, with the conditions stated in Exhibit"A", attached herewith., and the following additional conditions OR I move to deny OV 13-98-90 Home Depot Store and Garden Center Architecture finding that: Attachments: 1. Exhibit"A"—Conditions for Approval 2. Reduced Building Elevations F:\OV\OV 13\1998\13-98-90\ARCHDRB2.RPT 2 EXHIBIT "A" CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL OV13-98-90 HOME DEPOT STORE AND GARDEN CENTER ARCHITECTURE 1. Signage for this project is not part of this submittal, and will require separate review for conformance to the sign regulations for Area B of the Rooney Ranch PAD. 2. The color palette for this project shall be compatible with that used for the Albertson's and In-line stores for this development, and the Oro Valley Retail Center. 3. An archway element shall be used to screen the visual impacts of the rear lumber delivery door. 4. The roof of the structure shall be of a non-reflective color. 3 1 J FOAM CORNICE WI STUCCO FINISH .. 1•C.I PAINT CO. DI "DESERT CASTLE' MEDIUM TEXTURE, STUCCO 1•( #541 • FINISH. I.C.I. PAINT CO I.C.I. I "DESERT FLOOR'S #561 .I. PAINT CO.CO• "CORAL STONE" 2" ACCENT REVEAL I•C.I PAINT CO. ! 414/ r--- 38'—OF' AFF "CORAL STONE" �- .� _, : . • y j ..-t •:, �. of•1.w:. .1 t .r . h'•,`. �_. •at Ya -i ,..P' "i.+1:• _~�• 335 -i•`: :.r:.i�.t::,..•„. L-.�a.....•,•=•a.. v•4... —!.,.. C•• "`. may' ..r•-•; • ..—: ,.. :. •s.{: •:.'' - ',. V. •:•••. w�•'y:T•••••••�.">•.• -,•,,..�a•••:-r,':i. ••••••.:• •�••• ••.- - •v.•ry ♦• ¢:&..... .` -.:.w.. . ..Y, y: = r ..i -r • .r- Ss.... ".y` ,,,... : .'C. } •�': ., - r.•+ y'7;•.sa}' ,....-....4.,'.. •w �.:w'..rti,A•. •w L;t�.=..••:' s i •a: =�'- -'i�•.F-tr C•' .- .-: ti .wt 1;�' 3..w.:. '•::...'.. .. 7 - `•- ..�,� -�, '�'_ .� :-,.='''fir •,::•r-:2,. ,�Y,.-.�r.: :. •—.....-: , t:!,ayi � i •..'• ,.- yr'i•a i.,ti •:.r..,:l: .,..`.,.:, -. \.' ,. •w 4 J •..�Y,;.'f, ..r'I-1c. 4 '• ,Ll i/?t:?�- "r 71to . •,•��•'.= a 7• •.k,",-..r•.*'.,.tea^arr , ��,�•� •. .. .1s":te;,; • . ■ '•. �� J k`'• •. ems' 1 L.. i:--.: Y:1;" w - .ftaparsed.j•w.r i:....• ..,z �''• uf` Ci��▪. •• • -v: • • • _ • L.{'•`•. .�. •-:—. -,;.-•l:•Al Sr ::.•• y • •�"t. . ....----•'�:..a• }i �L i ,.�,'-•�`-. r '•e::. .• N. • J ..r-t•'•� `III. Jil. 'h:r>-:. r n.:4;d r.: '**-.:�:�,. �•'.i.•na`•▪ •'•-_ .i+ r',..s - :. .; t`. .eY •-% <<.a.�i _.t•Y Y• _ ':, '1•..w'• �i. -�ti+.- �•�..- .� �- ;•,;r� .?•.r• ..,. it :•i'.r:• _ .... _,+r,^ ..� x�f: .. L`_•.....:.• -;. ' �•i�' - �N'.re� _ _ .,.'t +!,• r• ��� '��.a•i,"c:^'. _:.w'.Z•." _;�_ •��_,' - ti•:w'i:.^:.i•• �' -i.•,. - ,t:' =,t.•s« l `.•••`"•l� 1 'w Mil,••:... •�_ � r•RW .. hi'..-.•�' r .r-:..�"'y • .;s'• � _t �..�h' •\�/ • .i-r .- t •�/'�=sci- {:-y. ;`. _;Z• '•, ..• I��. -:Sim:-':•••-;. !i• �•;��.:r.�r.z !.',•+r- ':4:)r••,•�-•`�•r �'•i. i1 ••f,t,:`•,•..,�J.• ••.Y'. :„7• 7 k - •r• •-••-• ..;,:.:-.;,-...:.4:-:• + ,... ••r.. .�• :r '.'" _ •II4��, .•_— :T .. •�,.•.r !�t-;w: _.r..r .f _r•--1+ , '�•.:ws• �e•.:: ��� �s",:!'� �r=..;. r y.t.:.�• ... . . .....:.,‘..,, �4F .. • '-r s, .�Yt.rt• •:s^•�•♦ .rY•..• •C` :-�-'_.X.w :r 1;T� ',/f•,- -e•w.1,r`�-r•.•aa:�r�•''r"''f'T.n+t`r-^�•;_..Y' w'`+ -`:�: C.•t•:t �i••.;•.:'.'; .~..:a• .V.. K•ter F j -0 AFF . •;, �•• ' :„, .• ..;,:. - _. .. r _ .r -- • ._. a -' ..- .. .•` .. _. ' ,I,t '�'-•:az•. t• ,. r1" :•t. �t --a`•�.t,. -.r...••�. .r�..a...w_,.^1" L_ :•• �rr•�•.�:• •y�• •�ti:•�r"=:`•..' C'. �rv'•.1�: • w• yr• is i..•` Y : , ...!...-.......zt.:; .......,-,.........,..„.., „.„.,......,,,,4--„, .: ,c ...., .••• _ ,. .. . •.I 1 rasa.•.. ��.. ... ii ii ^ t� 1 1 n 1 t 4" OVERFLOW, PAINT 6" OVERFLOW, PAINT TO MATCH ADJACENT I.C.I PAINT CO. TO MATCH ADJACENT SURFACE "DESERT FLOOR" SURFACE CMU BASE, 4" DOWNSPOUT, PAINT #581 6" DOWNSPOUT, PAINT OR CO BLOCK TO MATCH ADJACENT TO MATCH ADJACENT COMPANY, "TAN" SURFACE SURFACE • :. 4 P I. -----~ 1 •` TCRf I [T1Y.4r --�a l.q L_riBE:R`I�AAO I f -- rs.r iiaàa ... .. .. ...,.-.. •�as SOUTH ILIvATION saMabar•v.. - -- e•..e.. El NOR-1.1 L.IvATION .•o r•: aenat34r-•r-r 9 - R.. xxxx • UAW L.IYATION ORD V LI WM&bar•r-r .._. AP.".ZINP AODREISI DORED._ a 7,,....l. =4 - ,1 ~ .,,r;N,..•olor,•r roar 3fl • ---- EXTERIOR ELEVATIflN LAW't-tvAT ON � y •-' r A:�,O • UTi o efll 00 CO CO rij coo t.... r I I , _ :.rrw; • :;',.'Y S J y k (i) . � 1 tT rsr yi . 11-V 1 .r- . Trr 0 i 10 1 �._ � YY I I I i I I 1 • . - 1 . • - '.. 1..1, i i i I I I I .- I I 1 1 I I 1 I I { I I I 4'-i - . 11 1 I n lI II 11 I I 'XI.,tr• H - - - LH II »• ;�; II II II 1 �.''r f. • [ I 1 I 1 I 1 14- -';'1' k'Fri;i; - 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I -1 I J .-�• ' - I I i :: ' 0.. I I I I I I I Y •,• - I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 '— .,....,(.....,:-1: :. • 4,r,...t!'f.:tin. z. tiiriririiri- ``j ti-fit I 1 I I I I 1 1 F' I I I I I liL - ---9 t y, c A, : 3 , 1 I T — _ _ �•'�is ,Y ' 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 `.1: I �� • 1�!' :: :t • i�.'.,. ■iL I N'J u'r J1J !iTtl tl ;4 J I I y ..., It---a , I ; I �'_...�/: • '� ' 1 am e�Jll mm .__ I -- - 1 its,1 r 1 1 t7,--; i r"-:i' 11 If 111 kit.' __49=1_ _ _ _ . .. __ =1=i ii _______._..____ 1,____ _____i ___ T, �:„ --------— 1 1 I I 1 I 1 .�_, l I r i I I I I I I I t I I I '3 I w li 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 E.ILH, —.;., 1 1 1 I 1 � I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 fry , Mr-r , N-r N-r I•, a'-r u-r r� a-r I.'-r Jr-r , a-r Z'-L' wsc a-r .E-r �r-r v-r 11 >Ir-r t. ! 0 JI J• >e >z �. Erb 8 8 8 a1 cow 2® a I• 6u do........• H.OME A .,.. FLOOR PLAN • MN// S L 1 I � II` I I [ 1I ; CL I ^ I I A I I E - 11- 7 r A r 1 4 Cv- U SASE OCO BLOCK COMPANY, TAX JP��EYN AR/ 0xry4r.OY TOWN OF ORO VALLEY tir. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Ji �'t • Building Safety • Parks and Recreation Planning and Zoning • Transit Services PLANNING&ZONING DIVISION Pr) `"`'n 1 11,000 N. La Canada Drive,Oro Valley AZ 85737 D� ''UN D EO 1g Phone: 797-9797 Fax: 742-1022 c..foT December 4t' 1998 Mr. Mike Soto Seaver/Franks Architects Tucson,AZ VIA FAX: (520)795-9431 Subject: OV13-98-90 Albertson's Fuel Center Architecture Mr. Soto, Attached are the agenda for the December 8th, 1998 Development Review Board meeting, and the Staff report for the above referenced project. Please note that on December 2nd, 1998, the Town Council for Oro Valley voted 3-2 to deny the request for an additional gasoline station convenience use for Area B of the Rooney Ranch PAD. As such, the architecture for the Albertson's Fuel Center must be continued until such time that the Barclay Group can obtain approval for an additional gasoline station use for Area B. We thank you for your patience and understanding in this matter. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contac eat(52 797-9797 ext. 311. D vid Marsh Planner I, Current Planning `' /po 011 1\L5k 67 zt/e.../ � 2Y1� F:\OV\OV 13\1998\13-98-90\Albgascont.ltr . MINUTES OF THE ORO VALLEY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING Tuesday December 8, 1998 CALL TO ORDER: 6:10 p.m. ROLL CALL: Present Patti Jo Lewis, Chair Barry Allen,Member Mary Glueck,Member Richard Underwood,Member Nancy Mager,Member Jim Vogelsberg,Member Verlin Smith,Member Others Present: Valerie Feuer, Senior Planner Shirley Gay, Clerk Due to malfunction of sound system meeting was not recorded. MOTION: Moved, seconded (Underwood/Mager) and carried by a 7-0 vote to approve the minutes of the November 10th, 1998 Development Review Board Meetings as written. CONSENT AGENDA A. OV13-98-98 ELWELL FRONT BEDROOM EXPANSION, 2161 E. AMARANTH, SUN CITY B. OV13-98-101 OSBORNE SIDE ADDITION, 13890 N. ENGLE HILL DRIVE, SUN CITY C. OV13-98-95 RANCHO VISTOSO N11 AF RECREATION CENTER ARCHITECTURE D. OV13-98-96 HAYMORE TWO STORY CUSTOM HOME, HONEY BEE CANYON ESTATES,LOT 20 E. OV13-98-97 NICKLES ROOM ADDITION,LA RESERVE,LA MIRADA,LOT 21 F. OV13-98-91 CUSTOM HOME,RANCHO VISTOSO,N11,H&N,LOT 61 G. OV13-98-70 DOMINION HOMES,NARANJA RANCH,MODEL 2180 MOTION: Moved, seconded (Vogelsberg/Underwood) and carried by a 7-0 vote to 12-08-98 Development Review Board Minutes Page 2 recommend approval of Consent Agenda Items A thru G and stipulating Item F setbacks be approved by Building Codes and Planning & Zoning. REGULAR AGENDA OV13-98-93 RICHMOND AMERICAN HOMES,RANCHO VISTOSO N10 K&L (SUNSET RIDGE,)MODEL 549, APPLICANT ASKED FOR CONTINUANCE . MOTION Moved, seconded and carried by a 7-0 vote to continue OV13-98-93 Richmond American Homes, Rancho Vistoso N10 K&L (Sunset Ridge,) Model 549 to January DRB Meeting. OV13-98-94 LANTANA CORPORATION, CASA VERBENA AT NARANJA RANCH Valerie Feuer introduced the staff report into the record. Naranja Ranch I was platted in 1992,with 169 single family lots zoned R-4. The average lot size is approximately 19,000 feet, with lots as small as 10,500 square feet and the largest, over 144, 000 square feet. The subdivision lies on the north side of Naranja Drive, between La Canada Drive and La Cholla. Lantana Corporation, Inc. requests DRB architectural approval for Models 1664, 1736, 2144, 2176, and 2476 for lots 86 to 116 in this subdivision. These lots are located north of Glover Road, west of La Tanya Drive, and on both sides of Via De La Verbenita. All five models are single story configurations and designed in the Southwest Contemporary architectural style. Major architectural elements include recessed windows, a two-car garage, and varying window sizes. This architectural style for Models 2144 and 2176 are compatible with the surrounding structures in the neighborhood. However, Models 1664, 1736, and 2176, are inconsistent with the structures in the surrounding neighborhood because of the metal rooftop element. Staff suggests that the metal roof material be replaced with Spanish roof tile,which is more consistent with homes in the surrounding neighborhood. Leo Murphy, Architect, representing applicant commented he had no problem with staff conditions. He indicated that the colors had been mislabeled,the accent and body were switched. Member Underwood asked what kind of metal. Mr. Murphy commented it is a corregated metal. Member Smith questioned if the Homeowners Association has any problems with using the metal rather than tile. Mr. Murphy replied no. Member Underwood asked would the metal chip or fade. Mr. Murphy commented it does fade but should not chip. Member Glueck suggested the metal rooftop element should be an option rather than standard, and should be painted the same color as the rooftop. Mr. Murphy agreed. MOTION: Moved, seconded (Glueck/Mager) and carried by a 7-0 vote to recommend approval of OV13-98-94 Lantana Corporation Request for Architectural approval, Models 1664,1736,2144,2176, and 2476, subject to staff conditions and stipulating the rooftop metal element be an option. 12-08-98 Development Review Board Minutes Page 3 PLANNING STAFF CONDTIONS 1. Spark arrestors shall be camouflaged with a cap, as approved by the DRB. 2. The metal rooftops for models 1664, 1736, and 2176 shall roof-tile-an option and the metal shall be painted the same color as the rooftop 3. The exterior accent colors shall be switched with the exterior borly colors 4. ' 5. Ground-mounted mechanical equipment shall be enclosed by a wall to provide visual screening and noise mitigation, and shall respect all setbacks. OV13-98-90 HOME DEPOT STORE AND GARDEN CENTER ARCHITECTURE Valerie Feuer introduced the staff report into the record. Greenberg-Farrow, representing the developers request DRB approval of an architectural submittal for a Home Depot Store and Garden Center. The proposed building will be part of the Rooney Ranch Parcel B Development Plan, reviewed by the DRB on November 10th, 1998. The proposed Home Depot store has a floor area of 105,580 square feet, with a 24,000 square foot Garden Center immediately adjacent. The architecture presented for this project possesses several Contemporary Southwestern accents, and is similar to that approved for the Oro Valley Retail Center. A large 'porte-cochere' is also located on the front of the building, allowing for a covered 'drive up' pickup area for lumber and other heavy materials. The west elevation adjoins the Albertson's store, and the east elevation, is largely occupied by the Garden Center. The proposed Garden Center will feature column and cap architectural elements, canvas tent roofing for the nursery area, and a 22' high black plastic coated chain link fence. Matt Moutafis, 10707 N. Pomegranate Drive, provided a scaled model of his art work, "The Dancing Gecko's." He commented the actual sculpture will be approximately 12 feet high and 20 feet wide. It will be made from structural steel, stained glass and a light to project the Gecko's onto the building. There will also be a sitting area underneath. He commented the art piece will be like no other and would be unique. DRB Board Members agreed it was a nice piece of art work. Larry Slonim, Architect for Home Depot, commented that the design has not changed since he presented drawings from the October DRB meeting. He provided color visuals showing where the canopy area was and at the 'porte cochere' showed boxed trees and shrubs. The visual also showed the color of the building. Member Underwood suggested boxed trees or shrubs by the entrance. Member Glueck suggested having a bench or trees in front. Member Vogelsberg questioned the color by the Nursery area. Mr. Slonim replied it would be a contrasting color. Member Underwood suggested a dark green plastic coated mesh. Other Board Members commented they would want to actually see the color before approving it. Valerie Feuer suggested bringing a sample of the mesh so Staff could approve the color. 12-08-98 Development Review Board Minutes Page 4 MOTION: Moved, seconded (Underwood/Mager) and carried by a 7-0 vote to recommend approval of OV13-98-90 Home Depot Store and Garden Center Architecture, subject to Staff conditions. PLANNING STAFF CONDITIONS: 1. Signage for this project is not part of this submittal, and will require separate review for conformance to the sign regulations for Area B of the Rooney Ranch PAD. 2. The color palette for this project shall be compatible with that used for Albertson's and In-line stores for this development, and the Oro Valley Retail Center. 3. An archway element shall be used to screen the visual impacts of the rear lumber delivery door. 4. The roof of the structure shall be of a non-reflective color. 5. Sample of plastic coated mesh must be presented to Staff for color approval. 6. Massing of large trees between Porte Cochere to soften wall. 7. Color sample of woven mesh be provided for staff approval. DESIGN GUIDELINES STUDY SESSION Valerie Feuer introduced Steve Kellogg who is with Cornoyer-Hendrick, Inc. Mr. Kellogg explained how the guidelines would fit into the decisions DRB had to make. He briefly reviewed the guidelines that were drafted up for the Board Members. He informed the Board Members to review the guidelines and give him feedback or questions before they go to Town Council for approval. Mr. Kellogg commented that commercial projects should be reviewed as a whole as that would help the Board to make quality decisions. OV13-98-90 ALBERTSON'S FUEL CENTER ARCHITECTURE Staff recommended continuance of this item. MOTION: Moved, seconded (Underwood/Vogelsberg) and carried by a 7-0 vote to continue OV13-98-90 Albertson's Fuel Center Architecture until further notice. OV13-98-92 ORO VALLEY RETAIL CENTER ARCHITECTURE, ROONEY RANCH PARCEL "D" BUILDING 12 Valerie Feuer introduced the staff report into the record. Seaver/Franks, the architecture firm representing the Barclay Group, developers of the Oro Valley Retail Center, request DRB approval of the architecture elevations for building 12 of the center. The new commercial center, located adjacent to Fry's grocery store, is south of First Avenue along the west side of Oracle Road, and is zoned Development Area D of the Rooney Ranch PAD. The building is located along Pusch View Lane, with the front facing north into the parking area. The footprint of this building, as well as the parking configuration, is unchanged from the development plan submitted for Target. The zoning 12-08-98 Development Review Board Minutes Page 5 permits building height up to 30 feet, and the tallest point of this building is 28 feet. Architectural details include wainscoting, tile accents, arched entries in the center of the building, and columns supporting the covered pedestrian walkway, which spans the entire length of the building. A clay tile roof on both sides of the front facade complements the flat roof segment. Tower elements on corners of the other facades match the clay tile roof. Mike Soto, Architect for Seaver/Franks, provided a color visual for the Board Members. He commented that the theme of this project is like Target, same color and building material. There will not be any windows in the back of the building, the roof will be tiled, stuccoed trellis, and outdoor dining facing Oracle. Members of the Board commented how nice the project would look. Steve Ruble, 1591 E. Sonoran Desert Drive, expressed his concerns about the lighting. Mr. Soto replied it would be the same guidelines for lighting similar to Fry's. MOTION: Moved, seconded (Underwood/Mager) and carried by a 7-0 vote to recommend approval of OV13-98-92 Oro Valley Retail Center Architecture, Rooney Ranch Parcel "D" Building 12 subject to staff Conditions. PLANNING STAFF CONDITIONS 2. Paint colors and roof tile samples shall be identical to those on the existing Fry's store. Color samples shall be provided for permanent file. 3. Signage shall be consistent with the approved sign package and will not require DRB Agenda Committee approval. 4. All roof or ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be fully shielded from view (including from above) by parapets, walls or other methods as approved by the Planning and Zoning Administrator. Details shall be provided with the construction documents. 5. Conditions 1 through 4, listed above, and any additional DRB conditions, shall be incorporated into the architectural elevations of the construction documents, for staff verification. 6. Flat roof segments shall match building color. OV13-98-99 RANCHO CATALINA OFFICES ARCHITECTURE Valerie Feuer introduced the staff report into the record. The VCI Development Company, the developers, request DRB review and approval of the Rancho Catalina Offices architecture. The 1.58 acre property is located on the east side of Oracle Road, adjacent and north of the Dome Building. The zoning for this site is R-6, which permits business and professional services. The development plan and landscape plan was approved by Town Council October 27, 1998. VCI Development proposed to build two, one story office building totaling 9,948 square feet and 18 feet high. The buildings are separated by an open courtyard consisting of existing native plants and 12-08-98 Development Review Board Minutes Page 6 additional trees and shrubs. The proposed architectural style may be described as modified Spanish Colonial. Architectural elements include, fascias, rounded gables along the north elevation, wainscot trim along all elevations, and an arched entry-gate which leads into the open court yard. The Oracle Road Scenic Corridor Overlay District requires that structures shall incorporate elements consistent with Southwestern architectural styles. The proposed color and material for the roof is Arizona Desert Blend mission tile. Rick Bright, Rick Bright Architect, presented a colored visual. Mr. Bright asked that item one of the conditions be deleted as the windows cannot be seen from Oracle Road. Member Glueck suggested putting the arch or half moon detail on the back roofline of the building to keep it from looking so plain. Member Smith suggested screening the mechanical equipment with a wall. Mr. Bright was in agreement. MOTION: Moved, seconded (Glueck/Smith) and carried by a 7-0 vote to recommend approval of OV13-98-99 Rancho Catalina Offices Architecture subject to Staff Conditions and stipulating item one be struck and adding mechanical equipment be screened and architectural detail be added at roofline in back of building. PLANNING STAFF CONDITIONS: 2. Mechanical equipment must be screened by a wall. 3. Add architectural detail at roofline in back of building. PREVIEW: CANADA DEL ORO RIVERFRONT PARK ARCHITECTURE AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN Valerie Feuer introduced the staff report into the record. McGann & Associates, representing the Town of Oro Valley, will present a preview to the DRB of a development plan and architecture for the proposed Canada del Oro Riverfront Park. The approximately 23 acre property is located on Lambert Lane, east of the La Canada Drive, and immediately adjacent to the Canada del Oro wash. The Town of Oro Valley proposes to develop a community park on site, which will consist of a variety of sports fields and courts, and equestrial staging area, an outdoor performance area, fitness trail, playground area, and a 240 automobile parking area. The property is abutted on the north by Lambert Lane, to the east and west by residential subdivisions, and to the south by the CDO wash. The purpose of the preview is to review the architecture and development plan and provide feedback to the applicant prior to the formal submittal. Don McGann, McGann and Associates, presented to the Board a colored visual. He explained that the development plan idea of the park is put the highest use in the center away from the adjacent neighborhood. There will be a pedestrian walkway around the park, there would also be softball fields, multipurpose field, concession building, outdoor entertainment area. The architecture will 12-08-98 Development Review Board Minutes Page 7 have a common theme for all buildings. We are currently working with OVPD about the design to allow a patrol car to drive around and check the premises. Member Glueck ask would the walls be painted with a graffitti resistant paint. Mr. McGann replied no, it would probably be a paint that is easy to paint over. Member Mager asked would the playground be covered. Mr. McGann replied no, due to limited budget. Member Underwood asked about the lighting and park hours. Mr. McGann commented that the hours would be what the Town policy dictates,which he believed to be 10:00 p.m. Warren Bailey, 800 W. Peak Vista Place, expressed his concern over the lighting, is it automated, would there be a lot of noise and traffic. He explained he lives behind the area of where the park is going to be and feels the noise and lighting will carry up to the neighborhood where he lives, as it is a retirement area. On the issue of the traffic he felt there could be a hazardous condition with traffic coming around the curve at Lambert. Member Glueck commented that we must attempt to satisfy the needs of everyone in the Town as it grows (families and retired) but that we would take your particular concerns into consideration. Valerie Feuer commented the traffic concerns would be studied by the Public Works Department. Mr. McGann addressed several of Mr. Bailey's concerns. Karen Rogers, 1815 E. Starmist, asked would the park tie into the surrounding neighborhoods via trails and bike trails, also would there be access to the county trail system. Mr. McGann replied there would be access from the park to the equestrian park area, there is a plan for a bike lane along Lambert Lane and access to the neighboring communities. Member Underwood asked would there be a place for horse trailers and a turnaround. Yes, replied Mr. McGann. There was discussion about the amount of restrooms, are there enough for the amount of people that would be using the park. Also are there more parks in the future. Don Chatfield, Community Development Director, commented that are other parks planned within the next 3-5 years. OV12-98-19 CANADA DEL ORO RIVERFRONT PARK LANDSCAPE PLAN Valerie Feuer introduced the staff report into the record. She explained there are several planning aspects which apply to this project. They include the Canada del Oro Riverfront Park Master Plan. The OVZCR, and the Oro Valley General Plan. The proposed landscape plan is in general conformance with the CDO Riverfront Park Master Plan. The landscape plan provides the required 60'natural Buffer Yard B along Lambert Lane, and the 200'natural desert buffer along the east and west sides of the park site. A 25'Buffer Yard B is proposed along two portions of Lambert Lane, as the proposed parking area and one of the sports fields intrudes into the 60' natural buffer area. No buffer yard is proposed, or required facing the CDO wash. The landscape plan proposed to use a 12-08-98 Development Review Board Minutes Page 8 wide variety of native Sonoran desert vegetation throughout the park, including Sweet Acacia, Desert Willow, Mesquite, Blue and Foothill Palo Verde, Brittlebush, Greythorn, Prickly Pear Cacti, Fishhook Barrell Cacti, and a Desert Night-Blooming Cereus. The mesquites and palo verdes are used extensively through the parking and outdoor performance areas, and along the periphery of the play fields and fitness trail. Bermuda grass is also used extensively throughout the project. The landscape plan is not in conformance with the park master plan in one notable area. The park master plan calls for a masonry wall and supplemental trees to be located east of the drainage channel to mitigate the visual and noise impacts of the park to the residents to the east, as well as discouraging pedestrian traffic from "short-cutting" through the adjacent residential lots. The landscape plan is not in conformance with Oro Valley General Plan Policies in terms of the extensive use of Bermuda Grass turf on-site. While staff does not question the need for the use of turf in the sports fields, picnic, and outdoor performance areas, Bermuda Grass is also utilized extensively outside of these area. The use of Bermuda Grass as a common landscape element is in conflict with General Plan Policies 8.1 R and 8.1 which encourages water conservation and the use of low water,native plants in parks. Don McGann, McGann and Associates, commented he disagrees there is too much turf. The Town provides these community resources, a public park is for everyone and the fields will be utilized. If warranted, a trip to the Dennis Weaver park will show day in and day out there are families out there utilizing the park. The irrigation proposed is a water system that is monitored and cutoff if there are leaks or its raining. Member Mager asked what was the alternative. Valerie Feuer commented the idea is not to replace the turf. If that is what the DRB wants, then Staff will go along with it. Member Smith commented if we have Golf Courses then we should give the kids grass. Member Glueck and Member Underwood agreed. Mr. McGann asked if he have to provide an island between parking spaces, referring to item 2 of the conditions. Valerie Feuer replied that islands are part of the code and perhaps Mr. McGann could apply for a variance to eliminate the island. MOTION: Moved, seconded (Underwood/Vogelsberg) and carried by a 7-0 vote to recommend approval of OV12-98-19 Canada del Oro Riverfront Park Landscape Plan, subject to Staff Conditions. PLANNING STAFF CONDITIONS: 1. The following OV case number shall be stated on all sheets: OV12-98-19 2. As per Sec. 11-104 of the OVZCR, each parking row of seven spaces shall be separated with a 48" landscape planter, containing trees and understory vegetation. 3. Add the following General Note: "A clear plane of vision shall be maintained between 3-" and 72" in height, as not to interfere with vehicular visibility. 4. yard. 5. The trees located on the northeast side of the outdoor performance area, in-line with 12-08-98 Development Review Board Minutes Page 9 contour elevations 2515 to 2518, shall be moved east 1--5 to increase the outdoor seating and viewing area per staff approval. 7. irrigation plan. 8. A General Note shall be added to state that irrigation plans shall meet minimum ASIC standards and convert to reclaimed water should it become available. 9. The signature and seal of the registered landscape architect preparing the plans shall be places on all sheets. 10. As per the Canada del Oro Riverfront Park Master Plan, a 6' masonry wall and significant vegetation shall be planted on the eastern edge of the property. Talk to the neighbors about the 6'wall and address a letter to the Town. 11. Conditions 1 thru 10 listed above, and any additional DRB conditions, shall be submitted with a revised landscape plan, prior to scheduling the plan for Town Council. OV12-98-16 GIANT AT ORO VALLEY RETAIL CENTER,DEVELOPMENT PLAN Valerie Feuer introduced the staff report into the record. She explained this item was continued on the November 10, 1998 DRB meeting because there was no consultant present to speak on the developer'behalf. MMLA, Inc. representing the developers of Giant request DRB recommendation for approval of a project Development Plan. The subject property is a 1.42 acre pad with a 3,000 square foot building envelope, Building 10, Block 5, within the Oro Valley Retail Center. The subject property is abutted on the north by Block 2, Target, to the south by the intersection of Pusch View Lane and Oracle Road to the east by Oracle Road, and west by Building 11, Block 4,which is undeveloped. A one-story convenience use is proposed for this site. The development will have vehicular access off of the main parking area of the Oro Valley Retail Center and Oracle Road (SR 77). The building features 21 parking spaces, including 2 handicapped accessible spaces, 2-bike racks, and a loading area. Area D of the Rooney Ranch PAD is exempt from all aspects of the ORSCOD, with the exception of the requirement to landscape the Oracle Road ROW. The Giant development plan conforms to all aspects of the Rooney Ranch PAD. The Giant proposal meets OVCZR requirements for development plans. The use proposed for the subject property fall under the classification of"convenience use" under the OVZCR, and is required to have a 12' landscape buffer on all sides of the site, which is provided. Access to the site will be provided by a proposed 28' and 30' wide Parking Area Access Lane off SR 77 and Pusch View lane respectively to be constructed by Target development. Fill will be placed over most of the site. Approximately 2 feet of fill will be placed on the building location with a lesser amount for the parking lot. Cory Thompson, MMLA, representing the applicant, commented he had no problems with staff conditions. Chair Lewis asked would a sidewalk be provided so pedestrians would not walk on the landscape 12-08-98 Development Review Board Minutes Page 10 areas. Mr. Thompson replied yes. Member Vogelsberg asked if vapor recovery was required on the pumps and suggested that should be an added condition. MOTION: Moved, seconded (Underwood/Allen) and carried by a 7-0 vote to recommend approval of OV12-98-16 Giant at Oro Valley Retail Center Development Plan subject to the following staff conditions. . 2. Mechanical equipment, whether ground level or roof-mounted, shall be screened from public view and designed to be perceived as an integral part of the building, as per OVZCR Sec.9-110H. 3. Add a note to the Development Plan to indicate that the access road to the southwest of the site is tentative and still requires ADOT approval. 4. Final grading plan showing grading and construction details shall be submitted to the Town for review and approval for grading permit. 5. Per Section 4-504F, all new commercial related projects shall contribute 1% of the project cost towards public art. The design and location shall receive a recommendation by the Town of Oro Valley Arts Advisory Board prior to project approval by Town Council. 6. Signage issues shall be addressed in the architectural submittal phase of this project. 7. All ADOT right-of-way use permit for construction of access point off SR 77 must be obtained prior to grading plan approval. 8. The concern of ADOT regarding the proposed 3rd lane widening on SR 77 and the associated right lane tapers from the Target project must be resolved prior to grading plan approval. 9. If comment# 8 affects sidewalk location, a pedestrian access easement shall be dedicated by this project. 10. Final grading plan showing grading and construction details shall be submitted to the Town for review and approval for grading permit. 11. Add a vapor recovery at the dispersing head of the tanks. 12-08-98 Development Review Board Minutes Page 11 OV12-98-16 GIANT AT ORO VALLEY RETAIL CENTER LANDSCAPE PLAN Valerie Feuer introduced the staff report into the record. She reminded the Board this item was continued from the November 10, 1998 DRB meeting because there was no consultant present to speak on the developer's behalf. Area D of the Rooney Ranch PAD is exempt from all aspects of the Oracle Road Scenic Corridor Overlay with the exception of the requirement to landscape the Oracle Road ROW. The number of trees required and provided is seven. Several shrubs are also included in the ROW. The Rooney Ranch Oro Valley Retail Center PAD requires a 25' landscape buffer along Oracle Road except at vehicle access points. The landscaping for this area requires Bufferyard D which include 10 trees, 10 shrubs and 15 accent plants per 100 linear feet. A 4' high masonry wall will be provided. All new plantings will be irrigated with an automatic drip irrigation system. The Giant proposal meets the OVZCR requirements for landscape plans. The use propose for the subject property fall under the classification of"convenience use" under the OVZCR, and is required to have a 12' landscape buffer on all sides of the site,which is provided. Cory Thompson, MMLA,representing the applicant was available for questions from the Board. Member Glueck asked has OVPD reviewed the lighting. Mr. Thompson replied yes. The Board members commented how nice the project looked. MOTION: Moved, seconded (Mager/Smith) and carried by a 7-0 vote to recommend approval of OV12-98-16 Giant at Oro Valley Retail Center, Landscape Plan subject to staff conditions. PLANNING STAFF CONDITIONS: Per Sectioon 1 th /7C1? each row of seven p rking spaces sh•�ll be 2. Landscape lighting should be considered for this project in order to eliminate dark corners or pockets. The lighting on the property should not conflict with landscaping at maturity. PLANNING STAFF REPORT Valerie Feuer commented the next DRB meeting is January 12th, 1999. The reports will be late by a day or two as staff will be limited. It is suggested the next site tour be on January 9th, 199 which is a Saturday about 9:00 a.m. MOTION: Moved, seconded (Underwood/Allen) and carried by a 7-0 vote to adjourn the • 12-08-98 Development Review Board Minutes Page 12 December 8th, 1998 Development Review Board Meeting at 9:40 p.m. Shirley Gay DRB Clerk 3°31_12,��6 J 0 Tucson Electric Power Company a , . �� 1999 (� West Ina District cv RECEIVED / to -OWN OF OR(O VALLEY 4445 West Ina Road ' 4 PI°S'LIC WORKS Post Office Box 711 (WI-101) `"f',41TMEi ' 34.4 441 Tucson,Arizona 85702 c \ RE: PCN 99-1-13 February 26, 1999 ' Z0e6L 81"et'( Mr.Chuck Yost ry., Telephone (520)770-7500 OMN Electrical Engineers \'/ 23412 Moulton Parkway,Suite 230 V Laguna Hills,CA 92653 Dedar Mr. Yost: SUBJECT: Proposed electrical layout for: HOME DEPOT,Oracle& 1st Ave. Tucson Electric Power Company suggests serving this project as shown on the enclosed drawing based on the information on your site plans received in February, 1999. Please see the notes on the attached drawing including the alternate location of the Albertson's transformer and the gate or opening in front of the Home Depot transformer. Review this layout and notify me within two weeks if you approve this design,or desire any changes. We will need to hear from you before we prepare the fmal work order and the construction drawing. Date of Construction Please inform me of the date you anticipate the installation of electrical facilities. This will ensure that all materials required for this project are available to avoid delay of service. Service Requirements SR-205;SR-207;SR-208;SR-215;SR-220;SR-225A;SR-230;SR-233,figure 1 and 2;SR-234. Meter specifications are SR-414, page 2; SR-430; SR-431; SR-432; SR-435; SR-437 and SR-438. These specifications have been enclosed for your use. Fault Current The available fault current at the transformers is shown on the attached drawing. Legal Description When you approve the design, please have the location of the underground distribution system, including the transformers and the J-2 cabinet,tied down,providing a written legal description and a drawing showing horizontal controls prepared and signed by a registered surveyor or engineer. A 10' center line easement is required for the conduit installation (including the 4" duct stub out of the J-2 cabinet). A 15' x 15' easement is required at the transformer locations and a 10' by 10' easement is required for the J-2 cabinet. A legal description on original company letterhead from an engineering firm that employs a registered land surveyor is acceptable. In this situation, a surveyor's seal would not be necessary. I am looking forward to hearing from you within two weeks. You may contact me at our West Ina District Office, 4445 W.Ina Road,770-7521. Sincerely, Marilynn D'Antonio Customer Coordinator and Enclosure cc: G.Dutiel,Tucson Electric Power Company Oro Valle` Architecture/Engineering 4020 North 20th Street L..ijckett& ã..r Interior Design Suite 308 Program Management Phoenix,Arizona 85016 Construction Management 602/241-3335 602-241-3353 Fax Louisville•Denver•Phoenix Founded 1853 www.luckett-farley.com June 22, 2001 Ms. Judy Imhoff, Planner I Town of Oro Valley Community Development Dept. 11000 N. LaCanada Drive Oro Valley, AZ 85737 RE: OV12-98-17 Rooney Ranch - Albertsons Development Commission No. 63400 Dear Judy: Pursuant to your request, this cover letter and attachment is submitted for the proposed elevation modifications to the above referenced store we discussed when I visited your office. Per your request, we have included (3) three 8-1/2"x11" color renderings of the proposed changes along with the originally approved elevations for the store. For purpose of documentation and also per your request, we have included a partial floor plan indicating the store entrances and entrance canopy placed on the drawing directly above our revised elevation. These are provided for clarity and to also help explain the reason Albertsons has requested this minor elevation change. As we discussed, the sole purpose for the revision was to create two separate and distinct store entrances for the grocery store and the pharmacy. Therefore, it would be simpler for the public to identify each entrance so that parking would be less congested around the main entrance of the store and so that time can be saved by the patron by entering the store nearest the destination they desire. Per our meeting because these changes are very slight in nature and only intended for the above referenced purpose, this project will not require further design review, scrutiny or approval. By way of this cover letter and enclosures we will advise our client at Albertsons that these elevation revisions are approved at this time. If you have any questions regarding this, please call or contact me at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, LUCKETT & FARLEY Marty Flood AIA General Manager, Phoenix Office cc: Ty Morrison, Albertsons Gordon Keig, Albertsons Barclay Group J P, art lip, �o T °2 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY '611). COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT � 3a n • Planning and Zoning • Building Safety a 11000 N.La Canada Drive,Oro Valley,AZ 85737•(520)229-4800•Fax(520)742-1022 . • Parks and Recreation ALL , 680 W.Calle Concordia,Oro Valley,AZ 85737•(520)229-5050•Fax(520)797-2202 °UNDEO ' June 27, 2001 MR MARTY FLOOD LUCKETT& FARLEY 4020 N 20th STREET SUITE 308 PHOENIX AZ 85016 RE: OV12-98-17, Rooney Ranch Albertson's Administrative Review of Architectural Modification Dear Mr. Flood: This letter is in response to your submittal for the proposed architectural modification to the above referenced project. As we had discussed and as illustrated on the elevation provided, the modification consists of adding a front entrance into the store pharmacy. Pursuant to § 3-301, C., of the OVZCR, "Staff shall be permitted to approve minor/common sense changes of architecture ... ." Minor/common sense changes or alterations include those that: 1. are reasonably similar to the approved plan; 2. are not already completed; 3. benefit the town or the environment; 4. are not controversial; are consistent with similarly situated property; 5. do not affect mass or steetscape; 6. do not affect pre-approved plats; and 7. are approved by the neighborhood association, if necessary. The modification proposed meets the criterion specified for a"minor/common sense change or alteration"and as such is approved. Approval has been noted on the drawings submitted and a copy is included for your records. Presentation of this letter and the approved copy will be required to obtain building permits. Should you have any questions,please phone me direct at(520) 229-4821. incerel , Post-it®Fax Note 7671 Dated d3 Q1 Ipages� I / •► To/l �/ 60b4 From j , imiorc... •y I of • Co./Dept. 1 Co. 00 VA-(r;)1 Phone# Phone# Fax# L VI/ —,3�3 Fax# /..5 n'nr e e nr r . r xou ' f- �- _ T i►Albertsons +w _ - FOOD PHARMACY e - - -___, �._ -- — _ -... BANK , a,ter % a. z_ ® - — _ �k ORIGINAL SOUTH ELEVATION KEY NOTES 1 PAINTED STUCCO 2 PAINTED CMU 3 EIFS CORNICE 4 EIFS FRIEZE 5 PATINA COPPER CORNICE 6 PATINA COPPER COLUMN BLOCK 7 PAINTED METAL GRILLE n 8 PRE-FINISHED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT ° © � 9 PRE-FINISHED METAL FENCING ! 0,41I I. L 10 PAINTED METAL DOOR AND FRAME N �/ i lj 11 CONCRETE CURB WALL BASE /\ © © ' o i 12 PRE-CAST CONCRETE COLUMN AND BASE S U� ' 'Dr,�la�� 13 PRE-CAST CONCRETE WAINSCOT 14 PAINTED STUCCO PILASTERS O 15 PATINA COPPER WALL SCONCE o-O, � - CANOPY PLAN .,.. .. ,. : .. ....': ..,,. ,.>. .... X is C� :a> — �, ..40.SS..3,.,. z,..,..,:w- .«f^ .i,�o-. 1 w nsu,. `2., rc 9.G,� .W _'��+ fi �; t �� �:1 ��>y ;. .. . � z, _ . . z t v� Sx . - a. .� . "''F £#. r .. N : ; � a " "4am- . �a� - , 5 , ;r� x i Z i>. As em � ,4 :4 rI, � .A''''''''''''' 5 / - . . 1R46`rlCF Z. zc-a'a:.. ,- /� - _ t If i , '�- �- _ ®�.� / ':�v , r u ♦ DEPOT u '�-- . ,. P. Ai Albertsons � _�._ -_ d ., FOOD STARBUCKS BANK `_ r ... - ' pr YF„ ,_,l ■I —.— -�___ t-- __ 1.- II. ,.,,c', s -__— --_ _ - .t _ ...1 REVISED SOUTH ELEVATION ROONEY RANCH PARCEL B - ALBERTSONS ALBERTSONS NO. 0995 O R O VALLEY, ARIZONA ORACLE s 1ST AVE ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA Fn IWtl a1199n9 PliDENEK I W11AlF•canst APP• a D Y: TCl .RB BOA `�,1►,.111 AT, wiff � 'Z PR'JE T MANAGER 1 • ww _: ._. _. «�z�^*, ...�,_.. ,.,., _ .,.. ., z , � ,�), a,:, emu; �nT,xr \l1 _ iftAlbertsons ,_ - FOOD PHARMACY a -.-. BANK 11* ' J T I • ��` _tilff �, 7.�- f —i i11.1 ORIGINAL SOUTH ELEVATION KEY NOTES 1 PAINTED STUCCO 2 PAINTED CMU 3 EIFS CORNICE 4 EIFS FRIEZE 5 PATINA COPPER CORNICE 6 PATINA COPPER COLUMN BLOCK 7 PAINTED METAL GRILLE n o 8 PRE-FINISHED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT r N 9 PRE-FINISHED METAL FENCING1 ' 7.--- 10 PAINTED METAL DOOR AND FRAME \� I \ 11 CONCRETE CURB WALL BASE / . \ 12 PRE-CAST CONCRETE COLUMN AND BASE o `D,}W 17. 11.1 --11/11QQ 13 PRE-CAST CONCRETE WAINSCOT I 14 PAINTED STUCCO PILASTERS ®O ill FT 15 PATINA COPPER WALL SCONCE p CANOPY PLAN ry° is r , fi . I[tl1' II II IL F — _ f t - DEPOT1 i f_i___ A►A1bersons . I FOOD TARBUCKS RANK PHARMACY 1411111111 lmil Sri._. -1 _ ;''a17 — - I—_-- e i 1 rlsriu' 15 Ln REVISED SOUTH ELEVATION ROONEY RANCH PARCEL B - ALBERTSONS ALBERTSONS NO. 0995 ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA dtkLucket 1ST AVE ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA Lumley 111,....11339,0 APPR f J I BY 1' 9 RB/BOA �. Ir...J.-.0 'RI.IJ CT ANAGER July 25, 2001 MR GREGG MARTIN, ARCHITECT KURT D. REED ASSOCIATES, INC. 7400 E MCDONALD DR SUITE 101 SCOTTSDALE AZ 85250 RE: OV12-98-17, ROONEY RANCH ALBERTSONS AND IN-LINE SHOPS — PARCEL# Dear Mr. Martin: As discussed in our meeting of June 23, 2001, the architecture for the Albertsons and the attached In- Line Shops was approved by the Oro Valley Development Review Board on November 10, 1998. On December 2, 1998, the Oro Valley Town Council approved the Landscape and Development plans. Also on that date, the Town Council voted 3-2 to deny the fuel center. A copy of the meeting minutes and the conditions of approval were provided to you at the meeting. Please review all conditions and ensure that they have been met. Assuming that there are no major changes to any of these plans, the only public review process remaining is for the public art requirement. An application form and submittal schedule for public art was provided to you at the meeting. The focus of the remaining effort will be on completion of Improvement Plans. There are many improvements that still need to be coordinated to complete all engineering. For this reason, we recommend that the project be presented to our Development Review Committee (DRC) at your earliest convenience. The DRC is comprised of representatives from other Oro Valley departments, as well as other agencies. This is an opportunity to review project status and receive comments from other entities. In addition, it is an opportunity for Town employees to gather information to help determine whether any modifications to the plans may be approved administratively or if a full public review will be required. The form by which a Pre-Application Conference may be requested has been enclosed with this correspondence. Please note that the items to be submitted are listed on the form. However, for your submittal the Site Resource Inventory(SRI)will not be required. The completed form and the submittal items must be provided to be scheduled on the DRC agenda. Finally, as you indicated on Monday, a modification to the In-Line Shops architecture is proposed. Pursuant to Section 3-301 of the OVZCR, staff is permitted to approve "minor/common sense changes"that do not substantially change the architecture of the project. However, if the modification is considered to be significant, it will require review by the Development Review Board. It is suggested that you send a cover letter and rendering of the proposed modification to my attention to determine if the change may be approved administratively. For your reference, I've enclosed a copy of the approved Development Plan from our file. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please phone me direct at (520) 229-4821. Sincerely, Judith Imhoff Enclosures: Public Art Application OV12-97-17 Development Plan cc. Bayer Vella Shirley Gay Jeff Weir