Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOV139883 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SUBDIVISION ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW DATE: Ik14 24 KM? OV CASE NO. : 42 .1 e'&1 L` k'' k - 8 '- 9 3 (office use only) )Y • PROJECT: MD0t +SO '�'YGr+G� ,� �_�t SO el! SUBDIVISION/NO. OF LOTS NUMBER-1 g LEV OF ODELS/E TI �S: b hn, f'1 Ye C ,1-e.C��t a ��I pia J # LCC./'aSc I i.1/ APPLICANT: AS0e31-47sTy42_ r� t c LL 7---- ck kICAA.C, gl 1/10 ADDP.ES S : DX.X.v'1c�1r1r� ktA AZ_ SCAIDT TELEPHONE NO. . ID 6XJ,_ ?03_,] - 83 ,FAX: ��` T3_ PROPERTY OWNER: CIkL ' ADDRESS: _ PHO NO. : 03✓1 • W,:2 l� i� 44_,S „J PROJECT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: 1 t J '� AT G ADDRESS: 51�111� o _. ._. - - J DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD HEARING DATE: t0 Al /le ...._ ____________ S IGNATURE: k?Ik..- _ DATE: I/LAI /41 V NOTE: This application shall be accompanied by the required $150 .00 fee and twelve_ copies of the plans, 11" x 17" in size, each to inc +e dimensioned elevations of all models from all four sides, front views only of alternative elevations, if any, floor plans, including calculations of square footage of livable area, and a typical site plan. If not already on record with the Town, a color palette, including body and trim colors, and tile colors and style must be a submitted in an 8. 5" x 11" format. AT THE MEETING, applicants must have on hand for presentation, colored perspective or rendered elevations of all four sides of one typical model . SUBMITTALS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AT LEAST 18 CALENDAR DAYS IN ADVANCE OF THE DESIRED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD HEARING DATE. PI ORTHSTAR CONTRACTORS, INC. September 25, 1998 To: Town of Oro Valley Development Review Board and Planning and Zoning Staff Re.: WorldMark at Vistoso TrendWest Resort Properties Subject: Building Color Scheme The attached paint samples are the proposed colors to be used at the World Mark at Vistoso project, which is operated by TrendWest Resort Properties. Concrete Roof Tile: Lifetile Santa Fe Mision 'S'Tile 'Marbled Terracotta' # 1154 Fascia: Frazee Paint #1154 Marbled Terracotta 'Shade Tree' #8614M LRV- 38 Stucco Colors: Clubhouse, Lobby/Laundry Building, Administration Building, Ramadas, masonry walls which terminate into like colored building walls and all even number residential buildings Frazee Paint 'Tuscany' #521 LRV- 25 All odd number residential buildings, masonry walls which terminate into stone veneer columns and terminate into like colored building walls Frazee Paint 'Spanish Brown' #521 LRV-25 Trim: Exterior doors, Garage doors, Steel fencing Frazee Paint 'Desert Tumbleweed' #8723M LRV- 53 msoffice\wi nword\letters\twpa i nt.d oc 16927 East Saguaro Boulevard • Fountain Hills, Arizona 85268 • (602) 837-6983 • FAX: (602) 837-3043 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SUBDIVISION ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW DATE: OCA' KM? • _41b 1 OV CASE NO. : D I/ 33— 83 (office use only) PROJECT: _ vl t S SJBDIVISION/NO. OF LOTS: NUMBER OF MODELS/ELEVATIONS: Stk/14.%, A Ompi l _a -._ PA4.41.440:15 ._t 4 2 , VAMtpg4. APPLICANT: 140s M1Ae�'Ir _ ... — , ADDRESS: J 127 SJltte.VAR0 Rum f'!) oV N'jt,11\,_ t-4" 1 S AZ 142412 TELEPHONE NO. : 11 6o Z- g 37-Pi OO FAX: *02- ? ? 3 PROPERTY OWNER: +. AS 4-0&1€: _ADDRESS: PHONE NO. : PROJECT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: /4di,iJ Ov C ADDRESS: --- DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD HEARING DATE: 10/L11A& SIGNATURE: DATE: �l[11q NOTE: This application shall be accompanied by the required 150.00 tie and twelve_ copies *of the plans, 11" x 17 a in size, each to In ... - dimensioned elevations of all models from all four sides, front views only of alternative elevations, if any, floor plans, including calculations of square footage of livable area, and a typical site plan. If . not already on record with the Town, a color palette, including body and trim colors, 'and tile colors and style must be submitted in an 8. 5• x 11" format. AT THE MEETING, applicants must have on .-. hand for presentation, colored perspective or rendered elevations of all four sides of one typical model. SUBMITTALS. MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AT LEAST 18 CALENDAR DAYS IN ADVANCE OF THE DESIRED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD HEARING. DATE. ITEM TOWN OF ORO VALLEY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD REPORT MEETING DATE: October 1r, 1998 TO: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD FROM: David Marsh, Planner I SUBJECT: OV13-98-83 APPROVAL OF CLUBHOUSE, LOBBY / LAUNDRY BUILDING, BUILDING TYPE 3, AND BUILDING TYPE 4 ARCHITECTURE FOR THE TRENDWEST RESORT, RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 10, PARCEL H BACKGROUND: The 16.73 acre property is located on the west side of Hidden Springs , south of Pebble Creek Drive, and is designated "Medium High Density Residential (MHDR)" under the Rancho Vistoso PAD. Mirage Homes proposes to build a 111 unit timeshare resort, clustered in twenty buildings dispersed through the 12.04 acres of the site to be developed, with vehicular access off of Hidden Springs Drive. Mirage Homes request DRB approval of architecture for the project Clubhouse, the Lobby / Laundry Building, and two of the timeshare unit buildings, Building Types 3 and 4. Mirage Homes will submit architectural plans for approval for the Administrative Building, and timeshare unit Building Types 1 and 2 at the next DRB meeting. SUMMARY: Northstar Contractors, representing the developers, has submitted the Clubhouse, the Lobby / Laundry Building, and Building Types 3 and 4 for use in the Trendwest Resort development. The Clubhouse and Lobby/Laundry Building are of a Santa Barbara Mission Style, whereas Building Types 3 and 4 feature a more Territorial-like style. The Clubhouse is located adjacent to the recreation area, and possesses a pleasing combination of architectural features, including tile roofing, stone veneer columns, arcading, vigas, wrought iron grills, detailing, sconce light fixtures, covered patio, and a breeze way. The 4,000 SF building contains a variety of internal areas, including a lounge, game rooms, and a bicycle rental / storage room. The Lobby / Laundry Building is centrally located in the development, and contains 5,000 SF of offices, a lobby / check-in, a gift shop, and a laundry and maintenance area. The building architecture features tile roofing, vigas, elarssuppers, sconce lighting fixtures, stone veneer columns, and architectural details. Both structures are single story, with the total height for the Clubhouse and Lobby/Laundry Building being 22' and 18' respectively. Building Types 3 and 4 contain the actual timeshare condominium units, and have a livable square footage of 5,792 SF and 6,098 SF respectively. Both building types contain a variety of timeshare unit sizes, ranging from 782 SF single bedroom unit to a 1,778 SF penthouse unit. Architectural features include tile roofing, clay scuppers, glass insert windows,pop-outs, and column elements. All of the buildings proposed is submittal are below the maximum neight of 30' permitted in the Trendwest Development. A color palette has been submitted, and will be presented at the DRB meeting for review. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of these architectural designs for use in the Trendwest Resort Development, Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 10, Parcel H, with the conditions listed in Exhibit "A" attached herewith. SUGGESTED MOTION: The DRB may wish to consider one of the following motions: I move to approve OV 13-98-83,Approval of Clubhouse, Lobby/Laundry Building, Building Type 3 and Building Type 4 Architecture for the Trendwest Resort, Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 10, Parcel H,with those conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached herewith. OR I move to approve OV 13-98-83,Approval of Clubhouse, Lobby/Laundry Building, Building Type 3 and Building Type 4 Architecture for the Trendwest Resort, Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 10, Parcel H, with those conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached herewith and the following added conditions: OR I move to deny OV 13-98-83, Approval of Clubhouse, Lobby/Laundry Building, Building Type 3 and Building Type 4 Architecture for the Trendwest Resort, Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 10, Parcel H, finding that: Attachments: 1. Exhibit"A" 2. Architectural elevations F:\OV\OV 13\1998\13-98-83\ARCHDRB.RPT 2 . EXHIBIT "A" ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL CLUBHOUSE,LOBBY/LAUNDRY BUILDING, BUILDING TYPE 3 AND BUILDING TYPE 4 RANCHO VISTOSO,NEIGHBORHOOD 10,PARCEL H 1. Windows on all four sides of the structure shall feature pop-outs or be recessed, except under covered porches. 2. Spark arrestors shall be camouflaged with a cap, as approved by the DRB. 3. Ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be enclosed by a wall to provide visual screening and noise mitigation. ti MINUTES OF THE ORO VALLEY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING Tuesday October 13, 1998 CALL TO ORDER: 6:07 p.m. ROLL CALL: Present Patti Jo Lewis, Chair Mary Glueck, Member Richard Underwood,Member Verlin Smith, Member Nancy Mager, Member Jim Vogelsberg, Member Absent Barry Allen, Member Others Present: Valerie Feuer, Senior Planner Bryant Nodine, Community Development Administrator Paul Nzomo, Engineer Shirley Gay, Clerk MINUTES MOTION: Moved, seconded (Underwood/Smith) and carried by a 6-0 (Allen absent) vote to approve the minutes of the September 8th and September 22nd 1998 Development Review Board meeting as written. CONSENT AGENDA A. OV13-96-27 CANYON HOMES, CUSTOM HOME, SHADOWS OF THE RIDGE, LOT 23 B. OV13-98-73 THIRD CAR GARAGE OPTION, MODEL 1884 LA CHOLLA ESTATES C. OV13-98-96-4 CANADA VISTA HOMES, OPTIONAL DECK FOR 3 MODELS, VISTOSO HILLS D. OV13-94-36 BECKLIN HOMES, MODIFIED MODEL 1486, DESERT GREENS, LOT 10 E. OV13-98-82 CARPENTER CUSTOM HOME,IRONWOOD CANYON,LOT 22 F. OV13-96-16 C & C CONSTRUCTION,DESERT VISTA,LOTS 112 AND 129 10-13-98 Development Review Board Minutes Page 2 G. OV13-98-85 NEW WATER STORAGE TANK, ESTATES AT HIGH MESA, APPROVAL OF COLOR. H. OV13-98-53 VISTOSO GOLF CASITAS RECREATION BUILDING ARCHITECTURE Member Glueck commented on the chain link fence that she felt it should be a block wall, as the chain link fence does not fall within the Ranch Vistoso design guidelines. Valerie Feuer suggested adding a condition to make it a block wall. Member Smith asked for a consistent list of conditions for consent items. The Chimney Cap can be approved by staff and not come to the DRB Board. Valerie Feuer replied she would have those conditions corrected on future Consent Agenda items. MOTION: Moved, seconded (Smith/Glueck) and carried by a 6-0 vote (Allen absent) to approve consent agenda items A thru H stipulating item G have a condition adding a block wall around the Water Storage Tank. REGULAR AGENDA OV13-98-83 TRENDWEST RESORT ARCHITECTURE Valerie introduced the staff report into the record and informed the Board that the 16.73 acre property is located on the west side of Hidden Springs, south of Pebble Creek Drive, and is designated "Medium High Density Residential" under the Rancho Vistoso PAD. Northstar Contractors, representing the developers, has submitted the Clubhouse, the Lobby/Laundry Building and Building Types 3 and 4 for use in the Trendwest Resort development. These building are of a Santa Barbara Mission Style, whereas Building Types 3 and 4 feature a more Territorial- like style. The Clubhouse is located adjacent to the recreation area, and possesses a pleasing combination of architectural features, including tile roofing, stone veneer columns, arcading, vigas, wrought iron grills, detailing, sconce light fixtures, covered patio, and a breeze way. The Lobby/Laundry Building is centrally located in the development, and contains 5,000 SF of offices, a lobby/check-in, a gift shop, and a laundry and maintenance area. Building Types 3 and 4 contain the actual timeshare condominium units, and has a livable square footage of 5,792 SF and 6,098 SF respectively. Architectural features include tile roofing, clay scuppers, glass insert windows, pop- outs, and column elements. Glen Austin, Project Designer, Mirage Homes, presented diagrams of how the project would look and presented colors they are proposing to use. He also pointed out where the clubhouse and laundry facilities were located. He explained that tile roofs would be over the entryways and patio areas and mechanical equipment would be screened. Member Smith asked had the Oro Valley Police Department looked at the plans regarding the 10-13-98 Development Review Board Minutes Page 3 enclosed stairways. Mr. Smith expressed he would like comments from the Police Department regarding that issue. Chuck Trujillo, Oro Valley PD, offered general comments.. He will provide recommendations after review of the plans. MOTION: Moved, seconded (Underwood/Smith) and carried by a 6-0 vote (Allen absent) to recommend approval of OV13-98-83, Clubhouse, Lobby/Laundry Building, Building Type 3 and Building Type 4 Architecture or the Trendwest Resort, Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 10, Parcel H, subject to the following staff conditions and stipulating the Oro Valley Police Department review the plans and give recommendations to staff. Planning Staff Conditions: 1. Windows on all four sides of the structure shall feature pop-outs or be recessed, except under covered porches. 2. Spark arrestors shall be camouflaged with a cap, as approved by the DRB. 3. Ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be enclosed by a wall to provide visual screening and noise mitigation. OV12-98-09 TRENDWEST RESORT LANDSCAPE PLAN (CONTINUED) Valerie Feuer introduced the staff report into the record. She reminded the Board this item was continued at the September 8th, 1998 DRB meeting at the applicant's request. THMS Associates, representing the developers of the Trendwest Resort, request DRB recommendation for approval of a Landscape Plan. The 16.73 acre property is located on the west side of Hidden Springs Drive, south of Pebble Creek Drive. OVZCR Buffer Yard standards require a Buffer Yard A along Hidden Springs Drive, a Buffer Yard C along Pebble Creek Drive and Desert Fairways Drive, and Buffer Yard D along the remaining perimeter of the development. In addition, the Rancho Vistoso PAD requires a minimum of 10% of the site be landscaped or open space, and a recreation area is required under the OVZCR. The applicant has met these requirements. Todd Muma, THMS Associates, representing the applicant,presented to the Board a color visual of the proposed landscaping. Member Smith asked if the area to the west of the property was open space. Mr. Muma replied yes. Member Underwood commented how nice the landscaped project would look once it is completed. MOTION: Moved, seconded (Mager/Vogelsberg) and carried by a 6-0 vote (Allen absent) to recommend approval of OV12-98-09, Trendwest Resort Landscape Plan, subject to staff conditions. Planning Staff Conditions: 1. On the first sheet, amend the note concerning the field location of the trail to read as follows: 10-13-98 Development Review Board Minutes Page 4 "Nature trail to be field located by the Oro Valley Zoning Inspector, the landscape architect and a representative of the WorldMark at Vistoso to minimize disturbance of existing natural vegetation." 2. Indicate on Sheet 1 the end and beginning of the 20' natural Buffer Yard C, and the 20' modified Buffer Yard C 3. Label the 20' modified Buffer Yard C on Sheet 2. 4. The applicant shall provide a fact sheet identifying the pollen characteristics of the Gregg Ash with the landscape plan resubmittal. 5. Conditions 1 thru 4, listed above, and any additional DRB conditions, shall be submitted with a revised landscape plan, prior to scheduling the plan for Town Council. OV12-98-04 VISTOSO GOLF CASITAS LANDSCAPE PLAN(CONTINUED) Valerie Feuer introduced the staff report into the record. She reminded the Board this item was continued at the September 8th, 1998 DRB meeting due to a conflict between the landscaping and improvement plans. The Rancho Vistoso PAD requires a minimum of 35%of the development site to consist of landscaped areas or open space. The applicant has more that satisfied this requirement, providing 2.44 acres of open space and landscaped area, or 41.4% of the site. The western portions of the site will remain as natural open space, thus preserving some of the natural Sonoran desert environment. The applicant has elected to utilize a 30'Buffer Yard A along Vistoso Highlands Drive. The buffer yard will consist of a mixture of understory vegetation and trees, including palo verde, mesquite, ocotillo, indigo bushes, and feather bushes. Sisoo is also utilized in Buffer Yard A, which is not on the Oro Valley Approved Plant List in the OVZCR, and the applicant has provided a fact sheet to Staff stating the drought and pollen characteristics of the vegetation. Additional vegetation is being placed amongst the existing natural Sonoran vegetation, which will provide additional visual screening for the development and additional protection from errant golf balls from the adjacent golf course. The recreation area, and the landscaping of the parking area through out the development are in conformance with the requirements of the OVZCR. Glen Austin, Project Designer, advised he was present to answer questions. Member Underwood asked Mr. Austin about the Sisoo tree. Mr. Austin replied it was a hardy tree that was similar to the Chinese Evergreen, with a maximum height of 12 to 15 feet and indigenous to 28 degrees. Member Smith asked Mr. Austin if he had any problems with staff conditions and he replied no. Valerie Feuer commented on staff condition number 7 it should read minimal disturbance. 10-13-98 Development Review Board Minutes Page 5 MOTION: Moved, seconded (Smith/Mager) and carried by a 6-0 vote (Allen absent) to recommend approval of OV12-98-04, Vistoso Golf Casitas Landscape Plan subject to staff conditions. Planning Staff Conditions: 1. On Sheet 5, clearly indicate where the 40' Natural Buffer Yard D ends, and the 30' Buffer yard A begins. 2. The limits of the sight visibility triangles (SVTs) shall be more clearly indicated on all sheets. 3. The landscape wall elements located on the north side of the southern entrance shall be set back an additional 5' to ensure sight visibility and vehicular safety. 4. Remove the phrase "average width" from the augmented 20' Buffer Yard D on all sheets. The 20' Buffer Yard D is to have a minimum width of 20'. 5. The augmented Buffer Yard D on the extreme southern boundary of the site is to have a minimum width of 20'. 6. The drip irrigation system shall be extended to irrigate the vegetation placed in the augmented 20' Buffer Yard D. 7. The natural vegetation existing in the augmented 20' Buffer Yard D shall not be distufbed shall be minimal disturbance in the course of planting additional vegetation. 8. Conditions 1 thru 7, listed above, and any additional DRB conditions, shall be submitted with a revised landscape plan, prior to scheduling the plan for Town Council. PREVIEW OF ROONEY RANCH AREA B (ALBERTSON'S/HOME DEPOT) A new commercial center is proposed by the Barclay Group, which features Albertson's and Home Depot as the anchor tenants, along with some shop space. Located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Oracle Road and First Avenue, this center, when combined with the Target Center to the south, will become the Town's major retail area. Visibility and access from Oracle Road makes this site desirable for the commercial center being proposed. The Rooney Ranch Planned Area Development (PAD) is the overlying zoning document, and this site lies within Development Area B. Charlie Hulsey, The WLB Group, was present to review Rooney Ranch Area B (Albertson's/Home Depot). Colored visuals were provided to give the Board an ideal of how the project would look. Mike Soto, Architect for Seaver and Franks presented a brief review of the center. He commented there would be a lot of similarities between Rooney Ranch and Target such as the arches, copper patina detailing, and wainscoting. Larry Slonim, Architect for Home Depot, briefly reviewed building elevations and color. He expressed to the Board he would like their comments about the architectural elements and would be open for their suggestions. 10-13-98 Development Review Board Minutes Page 6 Matt Moutafis, 10707 N. Pomegranate Drive, commented on the freestanding art that will be provided for the center. He stated he hoped to provide the artistic rendering of how the entrance would look at the next DRB meeting. He commented the reason for having a preview is to provide an opportunity for the DRB to talk about what they like and don't like so the architect can produce the work and time isn't wasted redrawing the plans. Member Glueck commented she would like to see the arches staggered to provide depth. Member Smith asked where the carts would be stored. Mr. Slonim replied that possibly in the parking lot or there may be a cart storage in the front of the store or maybe inside,he was not sure at this time. Member Glueck question what the screening looked like that would cover the garden center. Mr. Slonim replied he would bring a sample of it at the next meeting. Mr. Slonim displayed a sample letter showing the type of illumination Home Depot is requesting for signage. After some discussion, Mr. Slonim offered to bring another display for the next meeting. This item will be continued at the October 27th DRB meeting. OV9-98-6 ROONEY RANCH AREA B PAD AMENDMENT REQUEST OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FOR DRB RECOMMENDATION ON THE SCREENING AND ARCHITECTURAL INTEGRATION OF PROPOSED OUTDOOR SALES. Valerie Feuer introduced the staff report into the record. She explained that the Planning and Zoning Commission has requested that the DRB examine and recommend to Town Council a method or series of methods to screen outdoor sales and/or architecturally integrate them with the building. Several methods were discussed informally at the meeting by the Commission members and the applicant. These involved actual screens, design elements on the items themselves to mitigate visual impacts, and architectural elements to incorporate the sales area with the building. The method advocated by Staff, and which appeared to be agreeable to the applicant and the Commission, was the use of column elements and /or arcading. Such a method would mitigate the visual impact of the sales area from a distance, 'frame' the sales items to provide an attractive product display, provide a clear and identifiable area for outdoor sales, and integrate the sales area to be building architecturally. Staff, upon the guidance of the Planning and Zoning Commission, has begun with the applicant to formulate an agreement on the development criteria for outdoor sales,which will be included in the PAD Amendment. Allen Tanner, Bourn Properties, was present to answer questions from the Board. 10-13-98 Development Review Board Minutes Page 7 Mary Glueck commented she liked the idea of an outdoor arcade, she questioned if there would be enough room on the sidewalk for pedestrians with flowers, trees and shrubs sitting outside. Mr. Hulsey replied yes. Member Smith asked for clarification of arcade. Mr. Hulsey replied along the front of the building is a series of arches and those are the porches, which will be covered and screened from the sun. Mr. Hulsey commented that items may be placed on display but there will not be any cash registers to purchase anything. Member Mager was in agreement with Member Smith, she felt is was unsafe for people walking by, and felt it was unsightly. Valerie reminded the Board that it was Planning and Zoning Commission's decision to determine if there would be outdoor sales. She informed the Board they could give their input regarding architectural elements to screen the arcade,but not make a decision on the outdoor sales issue. Member Glueck commented she would like to see restrictions on the archway areas with no more than 6 feet from the building wall and sales items restricted to under the covered walkway. She would also like to see benches under the covered area for pedestrians to be able to sit down. Bryant Nodine informed the Board that from a design point of view, if the Board feels that outdoor sales creates design problems, you should comment on that, but it is important to remember that because Planning and Zoning has made a recommendation to go to council there should be some architectural consideration on screening the outdoor area. Member Smith asked was there any restrictions on the signage regarding sales. He felt it detracts from the looks of the building if there are going to be large signs on sale items. Mr. Tanner agreed that sale signs should be restricted in size and that can be discussed with staff regarding what size they should be. Member Vogelsberg suggested having a wall in front of the arcade area. Mr. Swan replied we don't like the ideal of a wall as it restricts movement of product. Member Underwood commented he would like to know if it would be possible to have the landscape architect give input as to what area would be appropriate for boxed trees, and another area for bedding plants and change the mix from time to time. Member Glueck commented she would like to have this discussion continued to the October 27th DRB meeting as she feels the Board members should read the packet that was placed before them and have time to think about this and give their ideas at the next meeting. MOTION: Moved, seconded (Glueck/Mager) and carried by a 5-1 vote (Smith no/Allen absent) to recommend continuance of OV9-98-6 Rooney Ranch Area B PAD Amendment- Request of the Planning and Zoning Commission for DRB recommendation on the screening 10-13-98 Development Review Board Minutes Page 8 and architectural integration of proposed outdoor sales. STAFF REPORT Valerie briefly discussed upcoming issues for the DRB meeting on October 27th. She advised the Board of a site tour of Stone Canyon on Thursday October 22nd at 5:30 p.m. STUDY SESSION Paul Nzomo briefly discussed the revisions for the Grading Ordinance. MOTION: Moved, seconded (Smith/Underwood) and carried by a 7-0 vote to adjourn the Development Review Board meeting at 8:30 PM. Shirley Gay DRB Clerk ^ | / -_--___.--.__ ___ -__ _'__ _-____ _____.____-__ =~^ L_-- WIDUPCEL CID El Amok IL ICA ............................... *VAW POP 110 . / PtWm emy rrll��ITT AREA CAJCULATow--. ���' ~ w, ,=�°�= omMImwEDxKEm 4,050 *o TM / omCYmX SrommaE u+nmx / covMWmmunWmma ( mow-�mwsn TOTAL pwxJAweAMA 5wm2 *e ' - v CLUBHOUSE anFEPLAN | . W [d Mark 't V, t o s c, TrendWest Pesort PrOperties � . 44 -.L '11 M.1.Ilr7\'yfy{y K IA,1.11.JW wW. } NM CO. m 7aMf�TU�• /!ID tm vmAS �. - —-—-— —-— — --- ------------------- -------- -` 9 -+-2 . l zr- N1 __ - ��'�:- '. f�= f"r..�`"�`ti�i �� ;� 1 _ Ir h,FI�I,.�—; -E,t�.i■F� 1�'�.{i t �. ---------------------------- zr - % �I 1��I�:,%l�l��L �+1���� _- ---- ��-..... _+. ,!l01- E;�I.1l11�.••�I�INisllfl�till ■11T: ��I�IilE1t:�� i +t+10tA;+1 e1*t+It(1tA;y+tAl+' r- ''.`-=� 016 '`r i1 .. g 1 +1!I�!i!r� 14lt!►+I+�I!I!!I+i!: ►+I!_ , � tsMr+ _ _ :•�„�` Y `-�'' (Cp MIL Lro OP. :, � --- - Akoll cA+InreenPQ►>91>a nr. Z £ • /— - i.`i � � _1 �r` lil1� +►T. f.�assur OEN SATE AT PORTAL _ '• 1 _ >N ■ - +1+1 Eli 1 Iiiiliilalcliliya:lilifi14i1iii1ilsftil --- t=o.1ua Pew =f�t1 ,t+t+1+10,01+t+t+i.10 t+r+1I0,11+11,1++1 - - .. I r.- i..47!•f !t!1!+!t4lc�tltlt,tlrll!Il�tlt!Ill,t!E ,,11 r mina\ /num1 _--_ 1lr.l�..!hpi!i-�_ ..............................ggi. i u u . . . ._...� �lMti`iI1+Mt�1R .N111t*'ff>1M1 liii .s1 F-TE- , _.... - , i --- 7.--rr II .; . 1 fi 1 : E , : , 1 ' I EAST ( Front ) ELEVATION worm Ia,r>I+sRr SORER WILL CONCRETE +a vaaR 314. .,TCAL LACE ik STS,B, H 11.13-/ARAM L L STS7B+ VAC S7SZE�t W ta+r LACE Prex ,✓T A TT SLAM.* AT CaiMi Palo tar.14, ____LdfT PTxnwn NOCAlRo TON�1i��41N . Ni..IYC1TMO U.MAT!!!ALA NC MOBS tlIX@A. AIR ALL .EVAT0N UNa I TTP. 12 MOP MA j r vii •I+.1+trl t++1+I+t+gt+(Rt.rtley 1+111+1+1+1 I+ I+t+1+P -”1 / 114 10.4 Ebr1 +:+ ------.--..1 ,.. �., --,,,-._r___.__�._ . . - `1N 1.1-1.1.1 �1�1�4.rh_1 1,1-1.1.1. .I.iRt..1-1�1.1!1.1!i!r!1.1.1r1.1!1.1. - r"i!rMAr!1+!1!/rr+IN.A►!1!►i1!! `- - +oM!► . ii i i . =l+i•ul01Nrill lli lt+l ; illlii ®es ® +iiliiiht+ 1nnvl¶— .i11+ 11+A1+ +1+i+1110I+IA++t+1+► +I+I+t161+r+1I+t101+h1161* 1++O _.,I!t*1■1■ !t! !rIMf1!I!Ib!E!!+!!:+N11r IN!I!r(I!!►!t!1!!t!+!►!I!Et!►RI!E!Y b►!A►At!t4AIl!ti!I!F!Il+i* !i+r1+!4 ►!t.!!I!I! ,........- •-..,„,.. = r `> r - � ;.......... ..�....... �, — 5i 4 I s> ;: R — - R t 1 ; ri i(1, t �1 .__ �•r z . ► --- . I - - , ti is :tilt' �''.E-lit. ow�Arr�. 4 ✓ WEST ( Rear ) ELEVATION ea/Pt tifir•r-CP Iv cr never # yr woo. ,I,H 1111011118115111311 �( Itt ly 1 I I t ► ) I 111VONNIN w.sv�. .� ., J.., ✓v ►+11►I,10 R 1#.16-' -.41.11141;.1.4 Mi*r ' 21•. s ® ruin 1 _ - P- 0 0 0 CI 0 r"---) ---,.. .....__F , R�N��I��jE+t+1+E+t+tMt+tMi+trlt+i+1�M1�14RE+l+tsp�11►_,_. .4 ( r i _.-,--;"--.----- o- ----- ----- -` �:oi+!fM1xi1 t!1!1Za t!11!Itr►/h!IZA!1l:1131!t!1RMh.felMl!67.,._ -![MI;10-1.Mdh -: r-=-J /'1I : -11 1 1 °' ' -1-' - \ 1._ :! r L-- \O\ -4--4,-- ----,r,-H---,-,---,....-.,----•4-•---- ------,----- --4-.----- _____4__ : .. ..1 '________,_____ _ ,;,...4_______.2fr..._____1__\_..____ PIM MOP SOUTH ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION Omit Mr.T 0• &via WET.T-0" MATERIAL & COLOR PALLET ROOF T9.E: 'LF Tt.E/MONER' ( Marbled Terracotta ) #115 4 'Sons Fe Menior, Tie' 'IVO Serlee' STUCCO COLOR: 'FRAZEE' ( Tummy ) #621 ACCENT COLOR: ( fascia. ail etoel & fence )'FRAZEE ( Shade Tree ) #8614M STONE VENEER: 'ELDORADO STONE' ( Weetoeo Rubble ) CLUBHOUSE ELEVATIONS MAN ENTRY DOORS: RED OAK ( Clear etait ) MAE alter•To SECONDARY EXIT DOORS: 'FRAZEE ( Desert Ttanbiewee4 ) *8723M WINDOWS: ALUM. FRAME,SAND COLOR, CLEAR GLASS 4{lornhaiefeacr Contrri© OTZ v‘ /4 lil -n i/ v (L.)r 1 -1 r ue 4..,, ti, '.. \J vi d � , \i/ .. W ( �a 1. tLin 1 rendWest ResortPropertiesi 11 tia: Oro Valley, Arizona .,- CLUMP/• ftpi• 1 u A d Clubhouse Exterior Elevations September 23, 1998 I • w `'� f` ..............................................�........... --..................yam. ....«. .._—........__ ••.....-_....................._...........................✓/ ,�,�'\ti 1 . _--" _.3 _.- t 1 — �� - yam- s� 5 • 11... J! - i � .--- 1 i Ar=01 PC=1.1 '4...., ....„ - ...... r). -. } l --` �^ wwsl verse F --- 1 TAILS i Rag y • i y (. i--------1 COVEN)PATO ?' 1. Y < LA NNY i 1 j4'sal r1t5orfi�1 WALL �$ ( �y f�— tM/ Y�VIC! 1 iO -: . _...................................... ..................................... — 7 cli 0'30 r"- .'"\ Fri 17) er! ill 1 ❑ ~~~' sraRaa? ��eesneoow+ ._.. '�. ...-_ L_- L.__ f�: -, .._ f_p f 1 6 j _� .... .. i fit- , NM \ 1 1 t 1 1 i i / / i. LOUSY r--"� .�� 7 I l,.. i MANFT t i i i �+ ! : OFT SHOP { L 6 f tt 3f ; j ' r r ` i i t )-'• wcvte. ; i�< $ 1 $ { COMM PORCH t i .4 t ..,,may f`f ff`'.— ,,.,'`�\ \. erLISME al eIKE urx 1 5 `_ 1 Y, L �`w1 t , 1 : _.----— ttt 1 i S i f 1 s f I, S i i 4 S 1 1 % i `' 1 E 5 I & I 1 s,,, ,s_____ 1 } 1 1 ithrs. / 11 1 .Z•_-_, / F i I i AREA CALCULATIONS. I C ®NDtTIO vEf7� AREA: 2.918 s.f. LOBBY / LAUNDRY S�lft.Dt�; FLOOR PLAN 3 STORAGE / MI�J�I'Tl�]]]JCEI 1,731 a►.t. 3 COVERED 54*.DNG AREA (NoN cPIC� IT1 ED ) 585 a.f. *ate"s•" F I TOTAL WILDING AREA 5.052 6.f. I s ijl-kfiOO P� lI���JP oOQ��P�C��OP� 1/ : II< ,� 11 J!_st -- - `--'--"' f�� `� Lf ••)( /yy j ��L.i .s a f i � C iy f , TreM$:4wt .. ? a�b �r'S' ` i ��, to -.:i�n - �uil� ` F 1 .. Arizona — - Oro Valley, ueUNR' ! 1 CaPYIUGHT © 1998 WO 996110—9 1 ►tbrrf.r'"F�` ,M 4 Check-in ! Laundry Building Site Plan September22, � L - � Ar Keg MIT COMM 14AU. LIME!/AMER 11E6ON 'O:PCPETE=V ME PULED UM VISAS 7.,...---COL O%PSA811283 TEXPACCOTA MIA , --... ...—.)— ..-.— ........... ---. TOP OF PARAPET + _4_ 1'''". ,I .....„..... .18-OAF ..F 1,RPM MOM ••••• •• 4,7,4;'-.1 --- Lop.--_____:_._As , •I ,,,, p 0 0 0 ,i,.......... 0 -, .._ -.- 7'wow woe. ,4,.,, -kiValpoi. -'"1• OPPIPPi: ,_-•^-......-.- . -'."''''''-''-'•-•.----- la! ' .., ditt. .4*--HP ' r,n ils "^-• '-,.., --, ' '-' -... -, -. Ir-. ...".• ^ 11c4 1 COMA L 1_ • ***WM. t• -->--- _ — sok, t•i!, . . ..1. .,$.1010.00. 0.10~Iteil!lifu -- iii•••0~.. _ . i ED 03 co c—riq *UM IMO*UNEt EJ 1 1 113 i t MS*NMI*MEM i i , i i ,1,P.M RiCel .- ••• •••• '.i MOW I VS1090 slum velem \\....... EAST ( Freatm).Ekkakt•TAQAL, AT MUM ALLMAN PRAM WINO34 srsrei TYPCAL EXTERIOR SE.CCO SYSTEM COCCI*143K.KAA8111 ECM- or/ODP/We ELAM A.,UE48 LACE FINSI. MIEN PATTERS WIMOOWS AS fads 88,A AV SUPCE USW POMMIES socArin 0.4 ISAVATONS ' FRAME COLOPb SAKI pc, AU.NOTATne.MMENALS.NC MOM IMCIGAIEO MAT TO AU.ILEVATONS LUIZ! EP sy AvAPIE + -He't ../..... .--. AN."AAA. ICI CP MX. C ,...+‘ .) ,......_ .C7,..„t,tt....,:::‘,..117y•::,...: , r ..„.7.,1 zi„...,z,„:,... . ..,,.., i„.......4,t,•2..4.7,.., _-—-—-—-—-.:-:- ....... + 4. ........ + e , ..-,.... 1 .... - .41, J..", .4 ..1.ri..,,,, ••••,...',..^ "1'2.\t)1.1-,\?,) _ — ....,....-r.....••••••..drs-,..r.a.•.......,..L..r,.......: .... ..'•. ',,'' ''''...ntr'''''Z.-......,. el•••••••,-,ow i..........1 r.,.._ ..._, 1, s ___ flti , 1 gj Et Lti SAO , MP ,,, , , 111111111 NM& UMW Millik* -..., ;* le 1. w , ,i III 111111. 'EP CP=Am wu. 4. ÷ ro-4 t i \. 1 I I ;1 ; . . , Amyl 1-,;i6.;•1 , I II ,L, , ! ,,1.. r--..srai-i r iirin ; \ „ 5( " uwr ; i uldn. ' .' -I-4- 1_4 .; _ __ .._ .... , WIT t , ; I .1._ Li t .._. 1 P11.01 AZIOR / WEST ( Rea ) ELEVATION A/81834130 aeserrs 8'NEW MASOMIT YARD Sr-A094 WAU- (\'',ASTOS:1 woe AMR Sofa Mr.1,0" • ,E,1 .....TONIRIff 4 4 ''' RIP OP 1.1WIR # 4 1.11.0.NM ANT AM 10,..' ...... i.. .....4:' ,, 'TIT,,hhhitt,,,c-_,4--- I - ..- ..._. ,.., COI z---, t----),„ 1.011111,01:11 CI,O,FP / ....... ii MI MI......_..... -----) Mal,I.COR SOUTH ELEVATION &WM EOM NORTH ELEVATION Salk 1W•r.o Seale Mr.f-Cr MATERIAL & COLOR PALLET ROOF TLE 'LlFETILE/MCNEK ( Marbled Terracotta ) #1154 'Santa Fs Woolen Tie 1100 Serie.' STUCCO COLOR: 'FRAZEE ( Tuscany ) *521 ACCENT COLOR: ( feeds, ed sited. & fence )'FRAME' ( Shade Tree ) *561444 STONE VENEER 'ELDORADO STONE' ( Vlotoeo ROA* ) LOBBY / LAU1s0RY BULDING FLOOR PLAN MAN ENTRY DOORS: RED OAK ( Peer stein ) 1108.98/A I'd SECONDARY EXIT DOORS: 'FRAZEE ( Dethort Tumbleweed ) *8725M WINDOWS: ALUM. FRAWE, SAND COLOR, CLEAR GLASS il 6i©Erithat -.1 T CorrutTactoTa v\ TA 7/ , ,PI ,i1 (' iii, . E design - tlitijlif='—====--fountake Wei— alkali-- c: Oro Valley, Arizona corntoGKr 0, istss ii.01 016640....II MAU LALlsELEV Ailggrs,02.1.0.05 ruitizzrer w Check in / Laundry Building Exterior Elevations September 22, 1998 -- - - ........i....--- ...E.= . ♦ Y r TOP OF PA! - 'ET C +25'-3' A.F.F. ® L t k III Q . vt. imAmic, 2,10 ill ®� id kt,,,, g . , , v ,____ _, Hill 1111 '"'"'®'E� ,. ;R1 ,---I, �:. ) FINISH FLOOR _ y 11111 eb\ "—` t4= 'ij- . c "`� I ------- — Conceptual Elevation 'A' -- '-0" A.F.F. Wii — (o •.: Ati7::.'-';*. , sew w.rol I . - na i �OIN��i$ =moo_iia ,disi�.i,.I1 I riir — VTOP OF PARAPET Cops. ® ■I J = -- _ [� --�---------------- � ----- $ .. o o� ! +25'-3' A.F.F. 1111 w w Pais.. ......I... ' v rc0 .1.,.....,..,.,1.......;,.11.,.1..�.,...,....i...,..,..4 :$: fl M, - irs , 1i 1111 gmwary ..,.....4..... ,.;-,_, . I. IANNEI r 3 MI 1.1 ca Ea O Es I I I._ _ I, El ‘NZ r- to ! *-� I iiir FINISI-1 FLOOR I : ,., Conceptual Elevation 'B' +0 -O A.F.F.I EU ' \� Pais yr.w II:LEJl1J1 Lo AP. 1 El.,;- -----" P I -------- -------- -------------i ow TOP OF PAI�PET$ MM ,� Pais.. , u i�iir�:l:�ilil:li:li�i'ii'i1i O 404 tww — ]_ ,I N ill -. AREA CAi.t .ATIONS (Bt11.DNG TYPE 3) C _ ® ® ® LVADLE ARC(first floor) B.• D i - —� IIII r � r-� r 1 r •— F 1 N 1 S1-1 FLOOR $ CASITA'A''A''S 0 x 548 wf. 0 wf. —_— CA9ffA 1S'Otte Dekoonr 1 x 792 wf. 792 wf. —-—-—-—-—- u CASITA'c'Two6Md OC 2 x L062 air. 2.104 at. A Conceptual Elevation 'C' +Q, -O A.F.F. CASITA 9'Trim D.i oonr 0 x 1290 wf. 0 wf. CASITA V Tont:home 0 x 1778 cf. 0 el. or. sr•PO. TOTAL FIRST FLOOR 2A08 wf. LNABLE AREA:(second door) CASITA'A'VOW 0 x 646 O. 0 wf. CASITA'5!'Om 5okoottr 1 x 792 wf. 792 wf. TOP OF PA R,4 PE T CASITA'C'Two D..i•cottr 2 x L062 wf. 2.104 wf. _—_—_—_—_—_—_—_— $ 'D CASITA "Tlrw S Moonr 0 x t290 s f. 0 wL -—-—- +2 5'-3' A F F. CASITA T TenU cwiV 0 x 1778 wf. 0 if. 'I.■�.t■s sisisp■&ui'..�. 10 sr.■I.I■.inn■r■■In■1■PIK■ ail \` TOTAL 9ECOSV FLOOR 2.606 el. :'i i'"'i:i i':':1 i i'i.a. i i ii'i i ii'i'i:i'ii''►a — i ►i i. �i i i i i, �i i�� i-�i N Pia TOTAI.WIPING AREA(UVAELE) D.792 wf. _ ' COVERED FIRST FLOOR AREAS(WRY&PATIO) 1!. 11. fII. I 1 Pail 194TRY 405 wf. — CASITA'A' 0 wf. CASITA's' 96 wf. — CASfTA'C'(2 x 96 wf.) 196 wt. c i .� — CASfTA17 -airs — _ - -` — 1® ® DI CASITA T -wf. ICI . TOTM.PRST FLOOR CO AREA 607 at. r— - It_ r— !II! I I FINISI-1 FLOOR CO'ERED SEG0I0 FLOOR AREAS(WRY&DN.CONY) — � � _— EN11CY 405 O. -—-— t n CASTA'A' -wt. Conceptual Elevation 'D' +O -O A.F-F- CASITA V 96 al. CASITA'C'(2 x 96 wf.) 196 wt. Pais "r•w CASITA 17' -wf. CASITA TOTAL SECOID FLOOR COVERS)AREA 607 air. BUILDING TYPE 3 - 6 PLEX TOTAL D IZE40 AREA(COVERIV) L594 M. TOTAL MOW AREA(TABLE) 5.792 wf. ask ..••'O. TOTAL MEMO AREA(VIABLE d COVERED) 7.186 airs ROOM DIMENSaONS ARE APPROXIMATE tfl'onthaqau. 0 C entree itova Wor diMark at Vostoso TrendWest (Resort Properties .Msipn- aria +« ....•�•■• Oro Valey, Arizona corm inr © me .p Mem-P Mai � , teigr .w do powerit Conceptual Floor Plan Lyri�rw March a,1996 L i • . 91' S" .,„,_____. tip -� _ TOP O`�F P PEt t- ----------- �------------- �1 ------ +25'-3' OFF. $ ® ® ® :,::lei.:::::::r)nt7i......: 00000/'::::: 0 ■ / A ' II . :ill L ..,1 7:740, _ IIIIIIMMIll ` C _ 7�r1,14 �JI 1 :A_ ir)■ 2 ---- 1i '11T1 IN15N FLOOR *war 7 -E la `O 1` 1 141. II► . 4 11am r ,4 ik .. \*„� t1 I' "t'o l�=lice Conceptual Elevation 'A' . I = 1©1 1�"'a 1 " tl I� ,s, ill Sob...s Pr • �, -fir'' ='o[o , G ---------------- ------------- --- TOP OF PARAPET � Hh+It� o o 00 +25'-3' A.F.F. CO r- CS f,, AM, 'i P � 01 - - - III E-- .. — 0 1 o`.4o. -I-.. 1--.11 We1*Pl r r - '®' II7,Li. /,1.'(,Pfi..\, l, 4,Aai• 4Y 111.41 1-1 ii`lis�l FLooR l, < _ - f-A l . +O -0. A.F.F. :41 alb E la lit. D Conceptual Elevation 'B' , Li1111 le. INN ri TOP OF PARAPET$ ----------------- - - -----------------------_________ +25'-3' A.F.F. h-4,,..._9 ... Conceptual Floor Plan ° (® ® ®( H 1 n 1 1-1-1 lob W,.+O It B — EB ES El r Li i ,..... III I I11 1 ICI `l 1;1; FINI54.4 FLOOR AREA CN.AU.ATION3s 03IttD140 TYPE 4) —-—-—-—- +0'- ° A.F.F. LNAlIE MEN(first floor) CA9RTA'A'Bi the O x 946 s f. 0 at CAPITA'I►'Ow Dikoose 0 x 702 if. 0 if. Conceptual Elevation 'C' CA9ITA'C''Two P.Arood 0 x 1062 it 0 if. CAMP,V 11rw b&Aicd 1 x AXIO it. 1200 if. Oslo w o w CA91TA T 11.46romi.' I x 1776 O. 1776 a.+ - TOTN.RROT ROOK a,o49.? ------- -----_-----------------J _--TOE' OF PARAPET n .—---- +2 5'-3' A.F.F. WARE AREk(..cowl floor) , CA9TTA'A''9p1Ad 0 x 948 s f. 0 wf. CA8ITA T'a.906roosr 0 x 702 a.f. 0.t. & 9 9 ® —1 CAMTA'C'No Dalroa� 0 x 10E2..t. 0 if. I111I I_ IMOs CARTA V'T ew Owtum' I x 1200 af. �0.i CAMTA T r««hare I x 171b at. 1776 at. . —. TOTN.119001W MOOR 5.046 if TOTAL EIILDN3 AREA Q.MMLE) 6.006 if. Q` al EnC041 D 0l/TDOOR AREAS(PATIO&OALCCW) (1„1l - I11111 I I„�) 1 I I I CA9TTA'A' -al. 1I 11 I FINISH FLOOR CARTCA8ITA'TC' -if. +0'-O' A.F.F. CA91TA'D' -it cAerrA TOTAL 0 AREA -.t Conceptual Elevation 'D' BUILDING TYPE 4 - 4 PLEX TOTAL OLRDflO AREA WARE) 9i006 if. h!w••nv Om!w•VP TOT..MOW AREA G&I91Z&COMM -if. ROOM o1M13'1SSONS ARE APPROXIMATE. t© thto Contractor WokMa r< at VOStOSO TrendWest Resort Properties .dsNon-MUM Oro Va1sy, Arizona ItDGIELV azgr •.."'ItisConceptual Floor Plan Aprl 1f,199$ J V/5 ITEM C_ Imposti TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Approved by t DR own Council a DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD REPORT Date C MEETING DATE: October 27th, 1998 prai aruket TO: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD FROM: David Marsh, Planner I SUBJECT: OV13-98-83 APPROVAL OF ADMINISTRATION / SALES BUILDING, RAMADAS, BUILDING TYPE 1, AND BUILDING TYPE 2 ARCHITECTURE FOR THE TRENDWEST RESORT, RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 10, PARCEL H BACKGROUND: The 16.73 acre property is located on the west side of Hidden Springs , south of Pebble Creek Drive, and is designated "Medium High Density Residential (MHDR)" under the Rancho Vistoso PAD. Mirage Homes proposes to build a 111 unit timeshare resort, clustered in twenty buildings dispersed through the 12.04 acres of the site to be developed, with vehicular access off of Hidden Springs Drive. The DRB approved the architecture for the project Clubhouse, the Lobby / Laundry Building, and two of the timeshare unit buildings, Building Types 3 and 4 at the October 13th meeting. This evening, Mirage Homes requests architectural approval for the Administrative Building, Ramadas, and timeshare unit Building Types 1 and 2. SUMMARY: Northstar Contractors, representing the developers, has submitted the Administrative / Sales Building, Ramadas, and Building Types 1 and 2 for use in the Trendwest Resort development. The Administration/ Sales Building is of a Mission Style, whereas the Ramadas, and Building Types 1 and 2 feature a more Territorial-like style. The Administration/ Sales Building is located adjacent to the main project entrance, and possesses a pleasing combination of architectural features, including tile roofing, stone veneer columns, vigas, scuppers, detailing, and sconce light fixtures. The 4,160 SF building contains a variety of internal areas, including a sales floor, reception room, offices, and an employee lounge. The structure is a single story building,with the total height of 17'. Building Types 1 and 2 contain the actual timeshare condominium units, and have a livable square footage of 5,792 SF and 8,820 SF respectively. Both building types contain a variety of timeshare unit sizes, ranging from a 548 SF `studio' unit to a 1,778 SF penthouse unit. Architectural features include tile roofing, scuppers, glass insert windows, pop-outs, and column elements. Building Types 1 and 2 contain both one and two story elements, and have a maximum height of 26'. Two Ramadas are also proposed for this development, located at the children's playground and in the pool area. The Playground Ramada is a 12' x 12' structure with a terracotta tile roof, and a maximum height of 12'8". The Pool Shade Ramada features a 28' x 12' wood shade trellis, and a screening wall for the pool equipment, with a maximum height of 10'. All of the buildings propo_ this submittal are below the maxim____ height of 30' permitted in the Trendwest Development. A color palette has been submitted, and will be presented at the DRB meeting for review. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of these architectural designs for use in the Trendwest Resort Development, Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 10, Parcel H, with the conditions listed in Exhibit "A" attached herewith. SUGGESTED MOTION: The DRB may wish to consider one of the following motions: I move to approve OV 13-98-83, Approval of Administration / Sales Building, Ramadas, Building Type 1 and Building Type 2 Architecture for the Trendwest Resort, Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 10,Parcel H,with those conditions set forth in Exhibit "A"attached herewith. OR I move to approve OV 13-98-83, Approval of Administration / Sales Building, Ramadas, Building Type 1 and Building Type 2 Architecture for the Trendwest Resort, Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 10, Parcel H, with those conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached herewith and the following added conditions: OR I move to deny OV 13-98-83, Approval of Administration / Sales Building, Ramadas, Building Type 1 and Building Type 2 Architecture for the Trendwest Resort, Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 10, Parcel H, finding that: Attachments: 1. Exhibit"A" 2. Architectural elevations F:\OV\OV 13\1998\13-98-83\ARCHDRB2.RPT 2 . EXHIBIT "A" ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL ADMINISTRATION/SALES BUILDING,RAMADAS BUILDING TYPE 1 AND BUILDING TYPE 2 RANCHO VISTOSO,NEIGHBORHOOD 10,PARCEL H 1. Windows on all four sides of the structure shall feature pop-outs or be recessed, except under covered porches. 2. Spark arrestors shall be camouflaged with a cap, as approved. 3. Ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be enclosed by a wall to provide visual screening and noise mitigation. 4. The stucco pony walls shall be slotted to allow visibility of the bottom of the balconies and stairwells. 5. Wall pack lighting shall be installed. 3 MINUTES OF THE ORO VALLEY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING Tuesday October 27, 1998 CALL TO ORDER: 6:05 p.m. ROLL CALL: Present Patti Jo Lewis,Chair Barry Allen,Member Mary Glueck,Member Verlin Smith,Member Nancy Mager,Member Jim Vogelsberg,Member Absent Richard Underwood Others Present: Valerie Feuer, Senior Planner Paul Nzomo, Engineer Shirley Gay, Clerk CONSENT AGENDA A. OV13-98-72 A.F. STERLING HOME BUILDERS, RANCHO VISTOSO 5C (VISTOSO Heights) MODEL 2036 THIRD CAR GARAGE OPTION B. OV13-98-96 CUSTOM HOME,COPPER CREEK II,LOT 77 C. OV13-TRENDWEST RESORT, RANCHO VISTOSO 10H, ADMINISTRATION/SALES BUILDING , RAMADAS, BUILDING TYPES 1 AND 2 ARCHITECTURE D. OV13-97-63 U.S. HOME, CANADA HILLS PARCEL A (CATALINA AT CANADA HILLS) Models 66 and 69 MOTION: Moved, seconded (Allen/Smith) and carried by a 6-0 vote (Underwood absent)to recommend approval of Consent Agenda Items A thru D. REGULAR AGENDA OV13-98-85 A.F. STERLING WESTLAND RESOURCES, INC. RANCHO VISTOSO, RECONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF COLOR SCHEME FOR NEW AND EXISTING WATER STORAGE TANKS 10-27-98 Development Review Board Minutes Page 2 Valerie Feuer introduced the staff report into the record. She reminded the Board this is a continuation from October 13th meeting. The applicant had originally proposed a medium brown color for the storage tank and an olive green color for the chain link fence that will surround the property. The existing water storage tank is painted with a desert tan color. Westland Resources, Inc. has received color suggestions from several residents, who lived adjacent to the water plant. Based on this feedback, the request for colors has changed to a shade of green for both the existing and new water tanks, and a dark brown or dark green color for the proposed chain link fence that will surround the facility. Since ADEQ requires a seven foot high fence around water system facilities, a chain link fence is deemed preferable to block wall, which would have a greater environmental impact on the site. The residents feel that the use of darker colors for the tanks and fence will blend well with the surrounding Palo Verde trees and help to conceal the facility. Tom Martinez, Westland Resources, showed the Board aerial pictures of where the water tank is located and showed the steep grades of the site. One of the things Westland is trying to do is hide the site with vegetation and the darker fencing. Mr. Martinez has met with Mr. Schaffer and discussed his concerns about the tank. He explained that if the color of the fence is dark green or dark brown and with the vegetation the fence will be hid from Rancho Vistoso Boulevard. Mr. Martinez stated that Mr. Schaffer is in agreement that if the chain link fencing is darker it would somewhat hide the fence with vegetation. Another option Mr. Martinez had is to put in a block wall to follow grade or put in a block wall 12 to 15 feet high with the ability to drain the existing watershed. Mr. Martinez commented he is willing to work with all parties to get this problem settled. Gary Almli, Almli Construction, commented he wants the tank to be screened out as much as possible, either with a masonry wall or a combination of boxed trees. He commented there is no objections to a chain link fence around two sides. Mr. Almli pointed out where the existing tank is and where the new tank is going. Mr. Almli suggested a masonry wall painted to match the tank and possibly adding some dirt at the deepest areas and planting vegetation or hydroseeding. Mr. Almli commented adding a block wall will help buffer out the noise of the motor from the pump. Member Glueck asked Mr. Schaffer if he had any problems with the color or the height of a block wall. Mr. Schaffer replied no. Dick Maes, Vistoso Partners representing the Design Review Committee, commented he would like the Town to look at the cost of adding wrought iron rather than chain link as in the CC&R's chain link is not allowed Member Glueck expressed that was one her concerns in keeping with the design guidelines of the subdivision. Valerie Feuer commented she spoke with an employee at Lewis Management and they commented that the guidelines were not that specific about not using chain link just that it was not preferred. 10-27-98 Development Review Board Minutes Page 3 Dick Maes stated he would support chain link in the areas that it was not visible. Valerie Feuer suggested Mr. Maes and Mr. Martinez and others who where involved in this issue to get together and discuss what would work best for screening the water tank. MOTION: Moved, seconded Glueck/Mager and carried by a 6-0 vote (Underwood absent)to continue this item to the November 10th DRB meeting and stipulating the parties have a letter stating what was agreed upon. Planning Staff Conditions: 1. The new and existing water storage tanks will be painted a shade of green. 2. The chain link fence will be painted in a shad of brown or green that is darker than the color selected for the tanks. 3. A landscape plan shall be submitted that will mitigate the visual impact of the chain link fence. OV12-97-18B CARL'S JR.AT ORO VALLEY RETAIL CENTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN Valerie Feuer introduced the staff report into the record. She explained that a one-story convenience use is proposed for this site. The development will have vehicular access off of the main parking area of the Oro Valley Retail Center. The building features 29 parking spaces, including 2 handicapped accessible spaces, 3- Class II bike racks, a loading area, and a curved arch connecting the pad with Building 9A (Brake Max), in a similar style to Pizza Hut and Burger King. Area D of the Rooney Ranch PAD is exempt from all aspects of ORSCOD, with the exception of the landscaping of Oracle Road Right-of-way. The Carl's Jr. development plan conforms to all aspects of the Rooney Ranch PAD. The proposed restaurant use for Building 9B pad is permitted under the PAD. The Carl's Jr. proposal meets all OVZCR requirements for development plan. Paul Nzomo introduced the engineer's report into the record. Access to the site will be provided by a proposed 24' wide Parking Area Access Lane to be constructed by Target development and joint access to through PAALS of adjacent pads. The PAAL to be constructed by Target development will extend from Pusch View Lane and connect to the existing PAAL west of the existing Wells Fargo Bank. The off-site flows from Block 8,which impacts this site will be conveyed through two proposed 24' wide PAAL into two 24' wide PAAL of the proposed Brake Max which is its historical discharge point. Fill will be placed over most of the site. Approximately 2 feet of fill will be placed on the building location with lesser amount for the parking lot. Hence, the OVZCR requirements are satisfied. Steve Oliverio, WLB, commented he did not have a problem with staff conditions. The Board members commented how nice it looked. 10-27-98 Development Review Board Minutes Page 4 MOTION: Moved, seconded (Vogelsberg/Glueck) and carried by a 6-0 vote (Underwood absent) to recommend approval of OV12-97-18B, Car's Jr. Development Plan subject to staff conditions. Planning Staff Conditions: 1. The refuse dumpster shall be enclosed on three sides by a 6' masonry wall and plantings, and shall be finished to match the architectural character of the project, as per OVZCR Sec. 9-110C. 2. Mechanical equipment, whether ground level or roof-mounted, shall be screened from public view and designed to be perceived as an integral part of the building, as per OVZCR Sec. 9-110H. 3. Add a note to the Development Plan to indicate that the access road to the southwest of the site is tentative and still requires ADOT approval. 4. Final grading plan showing grading and construction details shall be submitted to the Town for review and approval for grading permit. 5. Per Section 4-504F, all new commercial related projects shall contribute PA of the project costs towards public art. The design and location shall receive a recommendation by the Town of Oro Valley Arts Advisory Board prior to project approval by Town Council. This 1% public art provision shall be included in the General Notes for the Development Plan. 6. The sidewalk of the northeast of the pad is 4' wide,but it is called out as being 5' wide. Correct this discrepancy in the development plan. 7. Conditions 1 through 6, and any additional DRB conditions, shall be submitted with revised development and landscape plans, prior to scheduling the plan for Town Council. OV13-98-84 CARL'S JR. AT ORO VALLEY RETAIL CENTER ARCHITECTURE Valerie Feuer introduced the staff report into the record. She explained the structure will be 25' high and the architectural style may de described as "Territorial" with a flat roofline, wainscot and window detailing and a parapet cap. All four elevations contain crown moldings, and wainscoting which will coincide in color and style with the existing buildings. The east and north sides of the building have a square, inset design which reflects an architectural detail found on Fry's, Pizza Hut, and Burger King, and the building will utilize the same color palette. The east and north elevations also include mid-wall moldings which will match the Brake Max structure. The proposed signage for Carl's Jr. consists of a yellow and red 2 feet, 4 inch recessed translucent illuminated logo sign. The "Carl's Jr." will be copper patina,halo illuminated letters. Member Smith asked will the mechanical equipment be screened. Mark Shay, representing the Architecture Company, replied yes. 10-27-98 Development Review Board Minutes Page 5 Member Lewis commented about the awning and asked would there be any signage on it. Mr. Shay replied no. Member Smith asked what color the roof would be. Mr. Shay replied they would make it any color the Board preferred. Member Smith stated is should be tan in color or match the building. MOTION: Moved, seconded (Smith/Allen) and carried by a 6-0 vote (Underwood absent) to recommend approval of OV13-98-84 Carl's Jr. architecture subject to staff conditions and stipulating the roof match the color of the building. Planning Staff Conditions: 1. The refuse dumpster shall be enclosed on three sided by a 6' masonry wall and plantings, and shall be finished to match the architectural character of the project, as per OVZCR Sec. 9-110C. The color of the masonry wall shall match the colors of the existing and adjacent structure(s). 2. Mechanical equipment,whether ground level or roof-mounted, shall be screened from public view and designed to be an integral part of the building, as per OVZCR Sec.9- 110H. The color of the screening shall match the building. 3. Per the approved Oro Valley Retail Center Sign Package, the logo colors, which do not match the letters, must be submitted for review to the DRB Agenda Committee. PREVIEW OF RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 11 RESORT ARCHITECTURE This item will be presented at the November 10th DRB meeting per the request of the architecture. OV9-98-6 ROONEY RANCH AREA B PAD AMENDMENT - REQUEST OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FOR DRB INPUT OF PROPOSED SIGNAGE Valerie Feuer introduced the staff report into the record. She reminded the Board this is a continuation from October 13th DRB meeting. The proposed sign guidelines differ from the previously approved guidelines for the Target Center (Area D) in three areas: color, illumination and maximum permitted height of monument signs. First, the Target signage permitted the color red for in-line stores, and copper patina for the commercial pads. The applicant proposes that the color blue, white and orange, the corporate colors of Albertson's and Home Depot respectively, be permitted in Area B. Second, the applicant proposes to allow internally illuminated text in Area B, possibly in association with halo illumination, whereas halo lighting is the only permitted means of text illumination in the Target Center. Third, The applicant proposes that the monument signs on First Avenue and Oracle Road have a maximum height of 10' 6". The maximum height of the monument signs for the Target Center was 8' on Oracle Road, and 6' on First Avenue. Staff supports conformance with the sign package approved for Area D (aka the Target Center) of the Rooney Ranch PAD. Trey Eakin, Barclay Group, commented that the monument sign is intended to be consistent with the Target sign package. 10-27-98 Development Review Board Minutes Page 6 Paul Blyer, Blyer Industries, asked Staff and DRB Members to step outside so he could show everyone what the illuminated letter of what the sign would like. He had three examples of what the letters would look like at nighttime. One Halo illuminated with full internally illuminated letter. Two,Halo illuminated with subdued internally illuminated letter. Three,Halo illuminated only. Member Allen commented he preferred the halo illumination only. Member Smith also preferred the halo illumination only. Member Glueck commented she preferred the halo illumination. Chair Lewis also liked the halo illuminated only. Member Mager preferred the subdued internally illuminated. Member Vogelsberg commented he preferred the halo illuminated only. The consensus of the DRB Members was to be consistent with what is at the Target location and have the same square footage on the monument sign as the Target project OV9-98-6 ROONEY RANCH AREA B PAD AMENDMENT Valerie introduced the staff report into the record. She reminded the Board this item was continued from the October 13th meeting and Planning and Zoning Commission has requested that the DRB examine and recommend to Town Council a method or series of methods to screen outdoor sales and/or architecturally integrate them with the building. Staff recommends the use of column or "arcading" to architecturally integrate the outdoor sales area with the proposed Home Depot building. Such an approach will essentially have two effects: one, integrate the sales area with the architecture of the building, thus mitigating visual impacts and providing a clearly delineated outdoor sales area; two, the use of columns and/or arcading will add to the architectural elements of the building, and thus reduce the massing of the proposed structure. DRB could also recommend other types of screening. Larry Slonim, architect for Home Depot, provided a colored visual to show the Board what the architect might look like regarding the front elevation of the arcading. The length of the porte cochere will be increased by 25 feet which will bring it to 100 feet. The intent is to create more shadow across the front of the building. Home Depot has agreed to keep products under the arcade and canopy area and within six feet of the building wall. With twelve feet of sidewalk in front,half will be limited to product and the other for people to circulate or walk along. There will be shrubs or patio type trees in the areas of the outdoor products, for every twenty feet of product there will be landscaping of some type. Member Lewis asked when the recommendation would go to Town Council. Valerie Feuer replied November 4th Member Smith asked would product be removed at night and Mr. Slonim replied everything except landscape plants. Member Smith expressed his concern on what type of products might be left outside such as bricks, fertilizer, cement bags, and tool sheds. Valerie Feuer replied the recommendation is to limit what product can be put outside. Mr. Slonim provided a sample of the vinyl coated metal mesh that would be used to screen the 10-27-98 Development Review Board Minutes Page 7 garden area. Member Glueck commented she felt the overall look has improved from what was originally presented. Member Glueck suggested a wall be added to cover products on display. Member Smith suggested a window to enclose products so nothing is on the outside. Member Smith expressed his concern about the outdoor sale items. He felt it would look unsightly and architecture would not clean it up. Member Mager was in agreement with Member Smith. Charlie Hulsey, 11361 N. Twin Spur Court, commented he liked what has been done architecturally he feels the color of the vinyl mesh should be kept black as it adds definition to the building. MOTION: Moved, seconded (Glueck/Vogelsberg) and failed by a 3-3 vote (Underwood absent) (Smith, Mager, Vogelsberg opposed) to recommend to Town Council pending approval of outdoor sales, that arcading be utilized to screen and architecturally integrate outdoor sales areas for the proposed Rooney Ranch Area B PAD Amendment, OV9-98-6, and that such design elements be part of the architectural submittal to DRB and stipulating an alternative suggestion to enclose the entire outdoor sales area. This vote was a result of differences on the issues of outdoor sale items. OV12-98-2A STONE CANYON I REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT, LOTS 58-133, COMMON AREA A& B,RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 11,PARCELS AA,AB, AC,AD,AE,C,D, & E Valerie Feuer introduced the staff report into the record. On May 20th, 1998 Town Council approved a Preliminary Plat for Stone Canyon I, Lots 1-125 located in Neighborhood 11 of the Rancho Vistoso PAD. Since that time, the applicant began revising the southern portion of the preliminary plat. The project is located in the northwest corner of Rancho Vistoso, north and west of the existing Golf Club at Rancho Vistoso, and the property will be accessed via an extension of the existing Vistoso Highlands Drive. The existing condition of the site is most undisturbed desert. Diverse topography, rock outcrops and several washed characterize the property. Stone Canyon I is the first plat within the limits of the new gated golf community planned for Neighborhood 11, and will feature a variety of custom homes to be built on the lots. The revised preliminary plat is a 76 lot single family residential subdivision, designed with a range of lot sizes, with a minimum lot size of 27,574 SF, and an average lot size of 42,188 SF. The overall density is 0.60 dwelling units per acre, and the minimum lot size is larger that the 14,520 SF required for the low-density zoning. The proposed plat contains several 100 year flood areas within the boundaries of the development, most notably on the western portion of the site. There are numerous lots which "lot" into the 100 year flood area, which is permitted in the OVZCR, with restrictions. The proposed development also contains several areas of riparian habitat, and the developer has commissioned a riparian habitat study for the subdivision area. There are several lots which 'lot' into the riparian habitat area, and thus are grounds for some concern. Staff recommends that the riparian habitat areas be set aside and protected with a conservation easement. The recreation area of the revised 10-27-98 Development Review Board Minutes Page 8 preliminary plat is to serve both the southern and northern portions of the Stone Canyon I development, for a total required recreational area of 1.56 acres. The original preliminary plat approved by Town Council included two central lots set aside as the recreation area, and Staff recommends that a similar approach be taken. The proposed Stone Canyon I development lies within the flight path of the La Cholla Airpark, an active private airport located just to the west of the development, immediately outside the Town limits. This situation has potential for adverse noise impacts on the development, as well as the potential for resident complaint and pressure over the activities of the airpark. The applicant has agreed to include as a general note that all perspective buyers shall be informed of the active status of the La Cholla Airpark, and that perspective buyers of lots 96 through 99 would have the additional warning over the use of King Air Drive as a functional taxi way for small aircraft. Paul Nzomo introduced the engineer's report into the record. This 76 lot subdivision of previously approved Stone Canyon I and Stone Golf Course,which had 129 lots,was expected to generate 418 trips per day to and from Rancho Vistoso Boulevard. The project traffic engineer forecasts that a traffic signal may be warranted at the Rancho Vistoso Boulevard intersection in the year 2008. This project site generally drains from north to south. Drainage generated onsite will enter one of several small to moderate sized natural drainageway. These drainageways can carry significant stormwater runoff. Grading will be restricted to preparation of roads and streets. Lots will be graded on an individual basis for construction of custom homes. Significant cut and fill will not be necessary to construct the streets and roads for this project. No grading waiver is required. Member Vogelsberg asked Mr. Nzomo has he arrived at the number of trips in and out. Mr. Nzomo replied the traffic engineer goes by the ITE code whereby given the development density, the number are taken off of a chart. Member Vogelsberg also questioned if sidewalks are required in the subdivision. Mr. Nzomo commented none are required in this development. Charlie Hulsey, WLB commented that a tentative map for phase 2 of Stone Canyon is being prepared that will include a recreation center. Member Smith commented that the Golf Course setback will be taken care of by requiring a wall. Mr. Hulsey replied that is correct, condition 1 requires a 50'buffer yard and a patio wall at the edge of the grading limits on the lots that are in violation. Member Glueck questioned the lots that are along the airstrip. Mr. Hulsey replied there are the lots that are along the taxiway and potential buyers have to be notified. Greg Conser, representing the Airpark, commented there is a problem with lots 99 thru 96, Airplanes do taxi along those lots and there is a lot of noise as well as the arena lights. There is a large ranch with 58 head of cattle that could be a potential problem and we need language that meets our approval between the Airpark and the applicant. Member Glueck commented there could be a problem with the neighbors and these four lots regarding the Airpark. Member Smith asked how much use the airstrip gets. Mr. Conser replied 10-27-98 Development Review Board Minutes Page 9 daily use. Mr. Conser wanted to emphasize potential problems with the four lots and the lights and the smell from the cattle. Chair Lewis asked Mr. Hulsey were there any problems with any of the 59 conditions. Mr. Hulsey replied no. MOTION: Moved, seconded (Mager/Vogelsberg) and carried by a 6-0 vote (Underwood absent) to recommend approval to Council of OV12-98-2A Stone Canyon I Revised Preliminary Plat, Lots 58-133 Common areas A & B, Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 11, Parcels AA,AB,AC,AD,AE,C,D,&E,subject to the following staff conditions. Planning Staff Conditions: 1. A 50' conservation buffer yard shall be placed along the rear property lines of Lots 68, 70, 71, 76, and 77, and a patio wall shall be constructed at the edge of the grading limits. 2. All areas contained within the 100-year flood limits shall be recorded as conservation easements on the final plat. 3. All areas contained within the limits of the riparian area, as identified by the study conducted by Harris Environmental dated 7 August 1998, shall be recorded as conservation easements on the final plat. 4. The riparian area limits on the revised preliminary plat shall be revised to conform with the limits of the Harris Environmental study, and an overlay of the Harris study shall be provided at the same scale as the preliminary plat upon resubmittal. 5. A revegetation plan for all disturbed sections of the riparian areas for this project shall be submitted as part of the landscape plan for this project. 6. Lot 118 shall be designated as the recreation area for the Stone Canyon I development. The portion of Lot 119 to the west of the 50' erosion setback line shall also be dedicated to the recreation area to provide access off of Canon de la Piedra, and is to include four off-street parking spaces. A trail connection shall be made between the recreation area and the PAD pedestrian trail running through the wash to the west of the site. 7. Revised General Note#39 to reflect the revised acreage of the recreation area. 8. Two copies of the CC&R's for this project shall be provided to Staff upon resubmittal. 9. Indicate in General Note#44 which lots will require a flood plain use permit. 10. Building envelopes shall be shown for Lots 89, 91-96, 99, 10, 104-106, 108, 110, 111, 126 & 133. Setbacks shall be shown for Lots 85, 89, 108, 113-117, and 126. 11. A 32' driveway access easement shall be placed at the entrance of Lots 125 & 126. 12. The rock outcroppings on Lots 99 & 120 shall be protected through a conservation easement. 13. Encroachment analysis and mitigation report will be required for any work into the washes. 14. The depth of flow crossing the wash shall not exceed 6" for Q100 flood for all-weather ingress and egress to lots 96-99 as per OVZCR sec. 4-305.E. 10-27-98 Development Review Board Minutes Page 10 15. Drainage structures at road crossings for interior subdivision streets shall be constructed and installed according to Town standards and paid for by the developer. All drainage structures must be designed to handle a Q100 flow. 16. Show the location of any proposed bank protection in this project. 17. The dispute concerning if a portion of this development is in a critical basin or not shall be resolved by obtaining an official letter from Pima County Flood Control before scheduling project to Town Council meeting. 18. If a portion of this project is determined to be in a critical basin, critical basin criteria must be addressed as per Pima County Stormwater Detention /Retention Manual. 19. One copy of boundary closure shall be provided. 20. Add general note #45 stating "access across flood prone area to building sites lots 96 through 99 will be approved by the Town and shall be the responsibility of the developer" 21. Minimum FFE and pad envelop for the following lots 89-119 and 124-130 shall be shown on the plat. 22. That portion of SVTs lying outside the right-of-way shall be shown on the final plat as sight visibility easements. 23. One foot (1') no access easements shall be properly and clearly labeled on all the plat sheets. 24. All existing or proposed easements that affect or benefit this property shall be shown. 25. All utilities lying outside of the road right-of-way shall be placed in utility and maintenance easements. 26. Any offsite sewer easements benefiting this property shall be executed and recorded prior to recordation of the final plat. 27. Vistoso Highlands Drive shall be constructed to match the existing section from its current termination to the gated entrance. 28. Any roads proposed for dedication to the public shall be constructed to match the criteria for right-of-way width and street section previously approved for Neighborhoods 12, 11 and 13 in an earlier PAD amendment(Note that the existing right- of-way and pavement section for Vistoso Highlands Drive meet the approved criteria). 29. Sidewalk shall be provided along both sides of Vistoso Highland Drive from existing road to the proposed gate. 30. The proposed gate must be within the boundaries of this project, not within the public ROW. 31. Vertical curb shall be provided along the proposed extension of Vistoso Highlands Drive. 32. As permitted in other areas of the Rancho Vistoso PAD, the private drive section shall provide 12-foot lanes and serve a maximum of 6 lots. 33. At grade or dip road crossings shall meet the Town of Oro Valley Subdivision Street Standards and Floodplain Management Code. However, no at grade or dip road crossings shall be permitted over washes with a Q100 greater than 500 cfs. 34. A final geotechnical report along with a pavement design report shall be provided to P& Z staff. 35. General Note #28 shall be revised to reference the correct geotechnical report. 10-27-98 Development Review Board Minutes Page 11 36. The applicant's engineer shall ensure that vertical and horizontal street design meets the Town of Oro Valley Subdivision Street Standards. 37. Streets shall be labeled public and private, as appropriate, on all plat sheets. 38. Elevations shall be provided at the end of all cul-de-sacs. 39. R.O.W., easement and street widths shall be shown on the preliminary plat. 40. A turnaround shall have to be provided at all gated entrances to or within this subdivision. The turnaround(s) shall be designed to accommodate an SU-30 vehicle. 41. Complete survey information for the overall boundary of the plat shall be provided. It appears that portions of the boundary data are missing from some sheets. 42. All existing R.O.W.(s)/Easement(s) adjacent to the site shall be labeled. The dimensions and recording information shall be specified. 43. All R.O.W and easements to be dedicated by final plat shall be clearly identified on the preliminary plat. 44. Additional emergency access ways or facilities requested by emergency service providers shall be provided. 45. On the preliminary plat sheets, the 100-year discharge and the respective drainage area for both pre- and post-developed flows with a Q100 value of 50 cfs or greater shall be shown. These shall be placed at upstream and down stream ends of the site. 46. Post development HEC-2 cross-sections shall be shown and labeled the on the plat. The corresponding 100-year water surface elevation shall be clearly annotated. 47. Location, size, material and design discharge for each of the proposed drainage structures shall be provided in a revised drainage report. 48. Minimum FFE's on those lots adjacent to drainage floodplains shall be shown on the plat. 49. Erosion hazard setbacks, floodplain and riparian area limits must be shown in a surveyable manner in the final plat. 50. A revised drainage report shall be submitted to provide recommendations and details for the erosion protection at the upstream and downstream ends of the proposed culverts. The calculations shall address scour depths; abutment toe downs, and appropriates calculations for apron sizing. 51. The word Hidden Springs Drive must be deleted from cross-section A because it is not a part of this project. 52. Delineate and dimension the access points for all lot being served by a common drive. Please note: minimum driveway width is 10' and minimum distance between driveways is 12' as per Town code Article 7-5-5. 53. All common drives which exceed 150' shall provide a turn-around area for emergency vehicles, as per the OVZCR. 54. If a density transfer is proposed from this development, as allowed in the Rancho Vistoso PAD, the receiving parcel(s) shall be identified on the Stone Canyon Plat. 55. Owing to the lengthy and complex nature of the conditions, the applicant shall have an early resubmittal date of November 10th, 1998 for the December 2nd Town Council meeting. 56. General Note # 41 shall be amended to read: "...Grading on lots less than 36,000 SF shall be restricted to 15,000 SF, excluding driveways and utilities. An increase of 10-27-98 Development Review Board Minutes Page 12 grading limits to 20,000 SF is subject to review and approval by the Planning and Zoning Administrator. Such building envelopes...". 57. Any construction which encroaches into the riparian area, as identified in the Harris Environmental riparian study dated August 7th 1998, must be included in the revegetation portion of the landscape plan for this project.. This includes any bank protection. 58. If the lot layout or circulation need to be significantly revised (as determined by the Planning and Zoning Administrator) to meet these conditions, the project shall go back to DRB for review. 59. Conditions 1 through 58, listed above, and any additional DRB conditions, shall be submitted with a `revised' revised preliminary plat, prior to scheduling the plan for Town Council review. Staff Report Valerie informed the Board of the up coming issues which will be Giant and Home Depot. There will be a site tour at 5:30 November 5th and encouraged the Board members to come to the design guidelines meeting after the site tour. A joint study session with TAC and DRB regarding the design guidelines will be next month. MOTION: Moved, seconded (Smith/Allen) and carried by a 6-0 vote (Underwood absent) to adjourn the October 27th, 1998 Development Review Board Meeting at 8:45 p.m. • i \ , . • i 1 .."...."‘••••.••••••••••••••••••/.•9'7 \ C\ ."'"•.., ''''.•••..... .s, 1 \ .,,„------''' • .• ---_, ***•••..„.1."..N..,....,I •-.............„.. IX./ ""`-•••-....„.. ''''S-,•,•-:‘ '.. •' 7.-...., ,s, --...m''''''' OM Ma ....., .• ...• \ ...•''• ••'• -.,•''-'7' .•'• , ...."'"\........fre ....,:; 1,,,,,, -•., ... \ ---•----°-----\\ . I •:-.-- ' i ------___ •,. --7-4.,,, .7. ,.......................... „c=, ...,- ---..„ _,• . --.--- --,. " ,1 I / *-^-•- '. --_,_,,_„.„ „,...._ •''•'.' ''''''''''''''•., ......,.....- ,... ..... ....--- ---„,_ .• .. ...,.,••''..........................'.11::..................................- ...-------..---.- .,--•-- \ \ _- --- ---------- ------ / I i I • •. . . .,---• ___ ..,---- . . •,...••••„.. / i / / ii/I,1/ ii •, , \ .,:, . , •-•-_,_ _.----- . --- .-'7. . . ..• ,.•• .•' \ \ ••.,.,..., .-•.".- ...• •••• i / // // / womisii/do -• .. \ -----•-, -,--___ _----__..- .--•., • .::::. •,,••, / 1 / I / '.. \ \ - • NJ' • . . _ ..,..„,_... -----_._ ..--- ------- ,..,....:'' , ".... ..,' ':". -. .,..,... •: ,•.... .. ..' \ ., • , 1 / .•••,* •,......................•.•............... .........,...,\••'-'''''' .••••' / / / / ":-',..,„..,...... -- •-• •.. -. '''.•:::::,......,..... ,..,:.,.: \,.. i ,- ? , N.:,.., •........•••• \ \ / / 7 L CD 4'''''' <N/11/>\, .... ... WO VIM MOP LW r // / / / ir, ;Ir.. 111 - /MAMBA',., .,/ 1...-.1 \ (......„. .\ .................•.. rarrAirre WALL ft/ l'I ...) ..., / :V t • • '.. 4.2.N.W.PINCE ARM , .., ..• • : . ,.. , N, RATAN'S NALL W r 10 MOW MIN URAL ../ /7•/..,./••• / / / / 1. 4 .1 IF ill E] --- , Er N.111416 PRICE ABOVE /......-—--—- —--..-----—--...--- —-_—--...---- i MAIL ROM 10 ON / '' '' • ,../ • '1 ... ••,,,, itlba IZENIND ../,,,,,,"/ / / / Alb MI •• 14. 6,-••• ._ ,. PICESERVED NAM& oral MACE 1 r--1 ,,.//// / ./ // IT PP rn--, ..,, PI 4, En --,.. ..... / z i /// fr- • - it . I if •il ... ...„. 4\1 , .4101C BM 1 i .1.7,71111t .... AM ••••—-—--—-——--—--——-- % • I • / ) / \ C / / / /1 /L ; ... 1. 10‘.11..1 s .411104"44C. I ,........ 1INNIS MORT ii. t: • •ftill 1-1' /vir. / / ii / i El RAMADA : ti-iThir..„....•"."----.""•••••-'-'€,\1. . •111 ..II _ail _ / / \ i • / III ..... 1 I .., . \ POOL EMIR' •i PETAINIRSI4A1J."V •• it ki.ASCE APOVECli lb.,. . / i / \ \ t!!!ga. / i Ili/ / I. . Latillirwrit r-i •-•-i• • f /,:,,,,, ) yER0 ••-* ft NH! Ts ID RECREATION -- / / PY /1 I N , 111::11A10 1111 a .0;41... .11. IL .. 7 / / /I/ / / / Er.) "4 ......_..............., i Alb A40' LAW I Ir El Illi 1 • T /1/ / ---, : HC • . CI : ,,, . . /- , i / ,/, . / •,.. di ...,1Limi4 1 ,ig....• r•:,... —e-'Wil * , .....) t . .1 C.:* ,......'---..- ....... /pm ill, /41%* / ir, .., , 1, E rr,r: if/dhl ,..... • 1 / \ --„, , , I.,1 `---.. . "i, ..4 I/ k iv •e$111 - 0 C::- MI I 11*- liri%Ali, i . 111 All. ,, , V1140.0 itescrt Cates. IMMO \ „3.1 *u141Atill*M:ILI 4 OF MP IS • "ft O._ •,,,, .." -".....,,........., ---,1104 --• vulmenemnsasamm r imilliViwwinsomm. ' I ri .... • .r - - /# / .. - i. L .4.7...„,:i. .. . •••., ti L i .. -t.' ,, '`.... ....-1-73"="0- '''''--, •,..., ,'• •,,, I i Jill .s if i i i i i OSSMLIZAItt........... ...slssmr.s.'-' .. ••••.,... ""*":•:-",R, ..-•.... ''-. ---..c...-,,,,.....:...,...:-,,,..„. ...,,,,i-• [2] I .,;•„, ,,,,, 4' •3••• ..... .., .-..,, billIU 0 Iht `). -• i /7 i 1 AISITIM HIM/RUMS 12114,„ - 4,-...1 RAMADA • 1 . ,., r".-t.'11111111111.• _____, , 1 // -..., 1..._.1 1 r ., i 1 112121\411131 WO -"""ra.... fr=1- ' ..... H '-/- --, -. ' i / / ' I URN.tootrtioli. sat MIL DM ..., .. •$ / • iiit/ ...d.' ---. ELA/ i /i ‘ `'..„. - i 1 f 1 ' 2M116/ PAM,MIMI i 0,44.... . . ii,• „ia CD P „ ------.z- -----:--. ---_' L .„...... .„ „ --,,,,,,_ _ I _ ,...... t' / 1 I 1 ,..1 ft. ..." e--- -----) Li i i I s , mica maims - ...„",*,•:,..:->..... -„.. two& 0 1 ••It‘I‘. 2.. illp . k• . Rua rats mow ,-,, •.-..,, .......„ 1-4 — 1,\L__ 1._,J I 1 i I i •.•... \ ccor•im. it-i '•••••„,.. '',...,,,,. ..;-_,.,...... -.-„...111.11, ' ..e,;;O ,i, ..,./ii 'FCIIIIII /1 4(:::. G._ I-1-C,-ii i I f 1 • $ 1 $ 1 Ass Issistrics MIMI MIIIIIIN WILMS INNS '''',.. ......... u3 14 Amp,, , - ii ..- - ' f ...STOPOISS/ 2 s..,.... ' .... '..'<'......-',..,.--'--'", '''-',.. LI •.. ,.. ...rum t I 1 11 TA k 1 ...77..,.... ,. • • . ‘..,..„ ..'-'s":":•:.-.--,_ -^- "... --",, 0 - ,,..,..,. '......„.., - -',..;;;;:.::::..----",... -----, 1 i Om 4 '''‘` ..,, means /MINSTAR COMPCIMIS ^-.. ,...... st. • :4. 4f.• s .47 .. .. 10,fif i 111142111 SAIMIND ILA& ' ...„, ., ,.'''s. '. ‘4 v. dm .....11111 rcurrAm ALS.AitutstAIMS• ..,.. ..,„.. ...,, ''' :.'"...:....---.-/- MISPAL.MIRVINCIM MMIITAR CONTPACTINIII .-•`.. ' tom a statiotto IILVD. ''' NAMMILW ,_. SITS MIA.(11.11Hara MIMI SP. ...."--, '-...„ ,..,., .._ ---...-_----. IIRMI DP MIBLUNS WS •11/TIS "'"^. "Rf16.'-‘"'•...bpi -•----- ----------- ------ 11111211141 covotose. --'--,-,.._ -^---- - --------.........._.,___„_ I lkiiiiitit/Oak 0Aablit A 11 C D E ___ ---...,_ -—---_ ICTTM.IRILTIMIR CONIIINIII. . P. 1. "....-...s mean ALMA CIMPAIII . ftft Ire Ora 1 POMO 2*ism 6 i 111611811 Mimi, ..----•--....„,, ••-.........•...... UMW TIIII ist.'lifts sib-sae spj,-toe tiso trodi.itte las iiis AUo WICK CALMATIONS. 010•11121 RiliN41310 li. . . '-^.--..--,...„,..._m_... . -.•.-----............................... ••••T"P•1'7 il. CIO SR CO I 0010 (4) ••... • - - • entro tans a 2.a rimnr2i 2:emus 2:=a ...........,...____ MANIA 1161 TIM 1 Oa MA.tlpo t-•pint (I) (111) ,(1) 1 4(2) 4 (4) • 4(11) 4 - - , .......„.___________.......s. AlelL11‘ IIMAA 0 NAO.1.1,1 0.•fft• C 11)014 • • '(•) • (4) a • • • • 111,11:16 I PIA 2 IMPLON1111 10 41444:1212 34 IMO" HAIMCPPIAM31111141104111110, 1 email 21 VMS MAO Ar 4-4 O. 4 11) 04 t 410 • (•) • AM AMOY 0 NYC! 24 1040111 41 1444111•• • , 1 A el_ le 0 100111111CMII.710 0 IIINFP AMMIIIIA1•31111-1:11L SPOCIIS PPCMCSIS el SPOCIIIS IS SPAM/ 12111110711M4111.411111.SIM/111•42116 TICAMIll I M•13! 4 SPAM ,usd pgia, - V 1 WIt...—re..,,,=== iiirorls MI SITE PLAN .... 1.. '..,r_thsterr Corotrectors ff.„.1. . .‘............,,....r‘,,,...,,....„. _ boild Moir 0 aell ,. .., ilialftgaili"'"'""" GM UM••OM - WorfidMar:( at Vistoso Oro Wary, Meow St*Develops's*Plot TrendWest Resort Properties owns *woo 21,WA F. ! - i : • 1 ' /7-- /1? UAW .........*--.-""' . • / - ..,.........-.---" IN--......- /' /I Ni.............. \ • 4111p 117 -..... \ I ! \ . -....,_.... n n • 1, \ --ii, ,,,_,- ............„ ., . laismir ----\ t- 1 112 I/ ....____,...---- ...------- ..- 1 DOCOVIICY ODOM /-"-- HAL OFTS -LI - ..........., SIM 0 11' COWED I a j---\f r.--10(:) i \\\I--- ....9,_. ,.. , .........., , ,‘,— . E:-..,..- Ti-T-19,,,..L............ \ . , 4, ,./ (7,,,,-) c.:), SPOIL 1 Oii / (,....7r-s) p MIGIP110114 E g „ / t„ (L6,- , .,.,:,.....20 al 13 • R E , \ iii / L.,,i,uk ' itI MOUPIMMINI PATIO 71' i. ‘,....) k,,.4 \ 021114TATIOSI — \ I 1 , \ 1 i. 1 r?'"? / 1 n 1---...- \ ‘ It ,, ‘ t ' f:..A Q-C) Li i ..,,,,,,1 ,....- \ ,\ , t, L .....1' -.." rf-9 A Cd Tit Iiir ...,: , OA.OPMICI 7 ze.... ea,, .,,. , L, ---,,, , ,, ---„ ,..„ ) ,,, ...... t___-, airs \.,. . _1 . el 0 I cions\ loon k47,-- E I I \\:\ N.N . .---;-4..-11°...,'_, --'"-11-14"----/ U ' =1 V.1.0.OPMC1 ILK MCI \ / \ imu. '\ 1.1 ill .7-'1.. - 1 2 I I li. 1 /' eV . .. ' ' . WW1- 1 1.-1 ' ' tj 10 - \\„_n_,./ ,: -- 4,HIMM SIIPPID MAMMY WALL \v., PO.OM 01PC 1 0 .MICE N. , . ri \ : 3 C, „ 0 ) r \ .1., / . „......._ Lai .....\ --------___ /-----,—.._.1 1 .%.................. -,_,—.._.—..--—.„----..,,...-...,——.—..........„_....,,,,._—._.,,.,_„...,,____,,...,....,..... i 1[7:1 °M21 I • ss„ ',..---,—•-" .—,..--,,---.,,,....... 1 i / /I \ / \ \\ .' ..'"'...."'"—.................... ---s...................,s......... —,,,--.—.*..—„—.—,....,.—,...____....---.,_. .. , ',........ 0 NM!WOW IMMO SOL.I .*.' //'/' Iif \ `.. N., ''',.., s".................... ......„............. ...._................. ...—_,..___,—_,--_,.._,...._,.._.,„,_...,...,„—_,.____—_—_... ,_______,. -- —• '—'—................ , J ------,_ ------- ....--: -------------_____ ....,„. i ...,.., , .......,„ .....,,, -, --.,..... -,,,,, ........„ ADMINSTRATION BUILDING FLOOR PLAN --_-_, SW INW a 14, .....„ „,..-.... ••••••----,,....-_,.--- „__........- -,.,.......„,..,.., AMA CALALATION94 ..----- 4.11X)AL COMM MAI (360 ol.COPORIV RUM ARM(10101101TVISO) V*0.TOTAL OULPH,AMA 0 ... TrendWest Resort Properties V S',:0S0 ihiorthatew Corrirtmctorr Wor dMark a .._,, ADMINFP ,.... Oro Valley, Arizona September 22 19911 -.,- cotymafr © 096 1144 IMMO..II 1•111136 Administration / Sales Building Site Plan , atfre:=711',.="tr't 1 UPCDLIV=WZIMPZ."IMF"1 . MUD UZ1.MESAS . II A.• 4•07.= i II—. 1." -Pil ISO. .....~. IIIN11111111411 litt.1 111114" ,-1-10-111 • 4......... i . : ilititillEIR12,-;>----- • -----". - . - -11121 o !I ififiiiirlii 1,. ii CO N..—_ ,...:- iiiiolki 1.•1.1.;--- - • -- I SIM e I, 1111111111101111 ,t t,, ..... _, e.......—., e-.......-.., ,..—......, ..... Tv WM,MOM 1..;••• I r ••• ill I I I :: T ---t -I 3, !.--, ,,,, .,, ,, /-1-- ilifillill ,, _ I 111111 11 11 1 11 '1 111 111 1 1111 11 iii „ „ WWI II :IF." ••••• '74—" Iti. 1: -- • :1 . '14, i 4...4114 ______.i ,, , == • T.04r•Pirk -- ... ' !MCI um*roam mimic 1111019 WIWI AT C1113111 . WEST ( Front ) ELEVATION •• • WK.in.Airim 1164. salon rows maw emu,: VISION*TOR Wein TYPICAL 1901010111 MI=SWIM CEEMLLJ3 KKR 11/194911 LIN MAMMY HALL w norms rams row maw wi UMW LAW MIK NOMA PAMIR IMMO Ali Ow*iM,•14, litir-411110 2:14 OLIVAllOmi • PIPKE COLON.fAtC KM ALL warenzirts AIM NiPIIS MCA= USA .--.------- - -- . —-— •---•- =ran . +1 lal .a. ,aior ilk milk lie :III ; ,,,,, II : Cal Irsigli 41111, alaP. iaitill!ii,iallailik a -- .1.. toot .i.i I .. _ , iiiiiiilioutiiimik,sts.. , ..... a ti 0 ' 0 —. ...rain + . -...,,,,, . - nr-11_-, -1-iiiila - __ ___ _ _ _ ____[..n I- _—_____g____g________1,,_ __,_. _ -,Aiiiimi...".. -_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -.:- P 7.t._._.:._ -___ ammo ......, 1 , . lUli hiindii WM. tlillillt. A111.1411. AVM. lifil III 1 1 IIIi I I Mal!! III I ill III --,...,,. 77 6,101111..P. 4 ••••AM 41.1.1MINIANISIMI.I I* i I '------ ' i2:7_4" ' .":--, Th' — 1 11 IL AM• •A112- KOS --,.----.------ --...-, il Pe, ! { INT I(I WIT I bar , Sal raito 4.42 APP. i N'-liTIIIPPLID LOW MAMMY WALL .1011310 WOK Val-------..-LICLITILIM Pea \--*14 AC 10411111$4141 EAST ( Rear ) ELEVATION AT COW% ilkoloc enr...f•Ce 4 11' o.'s * 111 ...._ iii. 0 0 0 0 0 0 — ..-- -4..m.tilioi II.:11.111111111 0 --,.....‹._,--.....,.....01. ..... "..... 0 ''.. .....-...' .................... .„.....,<1...1401-10P '...,...,..,, . ..^.. ...... .... ..'." ...,''''. ..;.,.„./'''''''''os.s ......L...N"11WO%. . . .;11:110• .•,... .4111 0 6 I AO. "1",,,,,'or,,,,'1"I liTir,%. ',..,.... N.I...0.4.0e.,..1: ,..........‹,:r . ,,.^..z.j ..--ri.tiliSili ANA. 41. ."INIIT,-. 1 --, m ,--,.... il ,.........., i, , ,--- - 11 1 1 R i II ' i..f.iL....../Ir ................... ,...L..._,... ....t..„.... ....:11......._.L.L. ‘Li...1..ii \ i 1, ,4 [ ,; ll r .00 4 k 0 AFF4 \•••WIC AC=PM FULL SOUTH ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION Sada sne..T-Cr kilo env.f-O• MATERIAL & COLOR. PALLET ROOF TLE: 1.1FETLE/MONIEr (Mart4ed Terracotta ) 81154 'Santa Fe MIselon Tie '1100 Series' STUCCO COLOR: 'FRAZEE ( Tuscany ) #521 ACCENT COLOR: ( fascia. all*teak & fence)'FRAZEE (Shade Tree ) 88614M STONE VENEER: 'ELDORADO STONE ( VIsteso Rubble ) ADMINISTRATION / SALES BUILDING FLOOR PLAN mAIN ENTRY DOOR& KED OAK( °ear et* ) SECOVAKY EXIT DOOM *FRAZEE ( Dewy Tumbleweed )1/8723M .....SNP as NP WINDOWS: ALUM.FRAME.SAND COLOR CLEAR GLASS .„_ 74r bAorithaterr Contracture W Or dMark , a... ,,. VEis.,.'-oso TrendWest Resort Properties Odesign - build feentala Ws.aims Oro Valley, Arizona COPYRIGHT 0 IPAS 11•011 01119410-..9 0911436 SALES& Ativrad=7,11.A=.wa Administration / Sales Building Exterior Elevations September 22, 1998 ___I , — 1 STD modoiscr•V.PESI W+LL .. �� .aI�O'Air. 4. .O A'Nr. s —' .v..wow'maim v d eWow'CORM P.F.F. 4 .ma Ara rr [ill Mil II / "' yt3ii : ,�,r ! f 11>, --- ----------- --------- ------------------ !CO sill •�r-�e'•.E r,'f i i>> +wl 1401 1w `/j _-•..—_,.....+H-— . o Ar .Qo'APP. ` 7 /` WIRTH 112/ATION WERT M.A11011 .4"e> RAMAD�1 ,/ N//LOW LACE FaoO4E SiK1 • .r �� ��f --------------------- r, .sernnaa' r /f PILL LOLMA M!4 LLTaR •gyp APP.�• ,r 10•a WNW NW. I ,f` _ •a4P APP. ,r r • .—■, _ter' 0 • • S.I4 M�ilff mom root.MRCS • M11 k `. -itttt' Wit • ;tstt !Ulf SPA RAMADA & POOL EQUP. ENCLOSURE SOUTH s MOT RLRVA110H4 Soda MS•.t 00 KM ALL MTTATYJ1b,MA1T41.* �MC MOMS A1� APPL7 TO ALL Q.E'AT14r6 UiW. Hick ARP a4 O. ori i 1.-- , --1 f 1-- NI,i44 ..... 1 04610. 1 _ 1 _4_ [ HOOK PLAN MOOR PHM i101>0N SWJ11 mD T11d115 FLOOR►+ ROI!!N Y.* TRRLA.15 UPETtE/►ISSER,LION Y1=CRETE RODE T1S C=LC.MARBLED T •GOTTA SiS4 TYP. a 1 4 .aF Poe 4 .4`. 10 ••4 1' ii% jA iI_� .o•t Art. _ . Rini\■ _ i!! 1 ' V 1�1!1?�+l.l�l�t�t.l!�t��11i. -_. t Z�� .o�.wwwtr ao.r•+u.et • 70,Orita-o•Air. • • • • •ow•Ara • • SOP a. 00rrmrm n•� .a.a.wowrcanm .!c Ara +ro'APP. L�. r-- -TSIMAL SKIVRER'STI•Cti ST9Tet T w/MST LACE POR..•N. PON ROMMIN ROM I -—-—- —^------ -------------- -----� "�.ROLM !� Air TOW/aavATHosy .4.d 1 TYPICAL PUNT/REAR daYAtIDN M'CNIIIM�� 'ind, T em%ev!WAGON 4-p' PLAYGROUND RAMADA POOL SHADE RAMADA TYP. SPA SHADE RAMADA Sank Mr.1-0" Soak Mr•to7 Scilie M.t-0' MATERIAL&COLOR MUST ROOF nu werkaroor(wow 1..0*)Am watt it lido.SW SOO w SSICCO COO Mast(two)111/1 Past O (HUE►r art i Am.)NA'(awr tree)SIM I ASPS tiww WOW WOW(era•.drRp) .oat MOW(awA TbMrrW)MIN RAMADA ELEVATIONS odd. Env•PO" Ellortheite �' C®Q'Q' veat©Pe ///���))) Q TrendWest /�`y/Q�(r/+�/. Resort N'.YAVNMI.':::. h'N'.N5'NM'AYAYNIN'!'M1V.':YA'NAV.5:�.5',SVNlN::lf.'l:Nnv:WM1'.Y,W,555Y.v.5'lv:M'.W:.N'.;N'AY:N.V:A'N:vA':Nl.VW.NS:v.VlMv Nor-dl '\'\ r k a t VOStOSO Y rW1{.M f Y Vst ResVf t Properties Odin* - build Ha�.r tea.Muss COPYRIGHT Q 1908 Sal MIS)-a Mot Oro Valley, Arizona POOlBEV te. •a itt ' Shade Ramadas Exterior Elevations octobair 6, 1996 1 1 L _I ' t eir toot» 1'IP C 11 -11rA-1tNjt a-1l 1,i-,.1l 1'1:'1':::." 11,IW, ,_ _I1•�1 ,0J1 :: .t+..�. ; ! `: , mo, ` !!i ' 1 !J' h- iter " ,_,^- _ 1 ,,,, ® ■.., , 1 14 l 'ill • ird. bi -- di' 7%; ---: - A lit 0 El 0 El 1"*""' 44 IP 10 Pi '- s‘. •-• "Tit • II �_ EiH b , �II 10 410 it 1:■.�/I �� !'!��F .�... �'4 � �© Fill Hid di „, N1� 4I H - .� pit �� • • ill - �; .toot Ira t..� � :ii II • [ __ x. 'il all . .0 ix liar a,El oitierI ■ I �. �!illi1i�11:. _ uIN - , lT�I 7s, 1. ttttttlll� =:1_ II,I ►r,31u■.111.3' mg __ ..... gvaPIMa - .m. • OF411 AT Ilk mur ix= 4,1* iimir di . as. P i SU 401 air4 11111 MI V ir., AT ♦ l gi, �_ 4iir �OII iiNitt r MI 1 - { C __ • tut ra ,I . .... 1),I<ififilIRS M{.}�1 o] .7:� II t•I INA MLA CALCULATIONS: (BUMPING TYPE 2) _i411111111111111116 .- ( toot. WW1 MIAs Ohs floor) • CAPITA'A''biwior I x 046 at 54b at. j ♦A. .,.,.r Z CAPITA V'Ow.O.Al 1 x 792 tuft 792 at CAPITA'C"Two Osiromd LOP 2 x 2 at. 2.104 at `�4 CAP VITA 'Tine Dairooar 1 x L290 at 1290 at CAPITA V T.Maor.' 0 x L776 sot. 0 at . 'I- \ TOTAL TROT R.O 4.734 atLIVAIXE ARM caeca�A'C110.0, 0 x 1146 at 0 at /4 f j--0' CAPITA P en OMieosr 1 x 792 at 792 at - - - _.___---.--------------_.______---_ -- �/ CAPITA'C'Tits Podroc ' 2 x 1A702 sot. 2.104 at CAPITA V'TM.O.Eaoxf 1 x 1290 at L290 sf. CAPITA T Twiaaor.s' 0 x 177b sf. 0 wt. TOTAL MOW KOOK 4.106 s.f. TOTAL MOHO MLA OkAOLE 402O at COMM ARV,to AREAS(ENTRY&RAW) WIRY 402 at. CAPITA W 04 at CAPITA V *at CAPITA'C(2 x lib sofa Nob at CAPITA V la at CAPITA T -O. TOTAL PICOT!!MOOR COMM AREA 902 at COVERIP PIECOIN'FLOOR MAP(ENTRY&PAL00HY) RIMY 404 at CAPITA'A' -at CAPITA V ab at CAPITA'C'(2 x 90 at) lib at C CAPITA V 12 at ., CAPITA TTOTAL 0p FLOOR C MM MAMO wf. B(•D BUN.DI G TYPE 2 - 9 PLEX TOTAL OtLD101G MA(COMP) We at TOTAL MOW MLA 0.V. I.E) Apo at A *r. w..a TOTAL.PULPING AREA(120111&COMM) 101nt a?. ROOM DNINEOI4$ARE APPROXIMATE Acorthater Contvectors VVorllcMarI< at Vstoso TrendWest Resort Properties fassii iim.rote Oro Valley, Arizona KcaaR f!a'd1C•''''""'+ Conceptual Floor Plan sin.30,INS 1 ---- art , 2G'-_0"A FE._ . rt tijiii ' vitt — Q0 in 0 _ _.'•., ....... -- 0 __, E3 01 Imp 1111 LI1 1 �, I.-- lit ..... _00_-__c__•-_A FP Conceptual Elevation 'A' art wtw (al - + 2G ,—G AFC __,,,� _ ._� dada. .-. if n . il Ill °! . TaL 1 III ,a,a,.a,a a,.a:a:a,a a,a,a ,a,.,a a,a a,a•,a,a,a a.,.,. ..1...mr ED N 7.—_ 0 1i fl t o o A Fr Conceptual Elevation 'B' Wit rr.1s n r� o a :::"-f 2-6" 'Q N A r: . toa IA d Mo 11111iilaiil. II., LtJJj El ® El [1:11 Mil O O D 0 II♦II ' I��I LE " i - sirs Q'-0 Ar r [[1 J _ _ , ii., it, I I I I I I Conceptual Elevation 'C' daft 1►.PO • in n ------ =-, 2 6—'-Q AFT !!!II!!'::'..'!':!! !!! ..rinar..'..l.lq.q■ 10 Di ..apl■.■■.p..ul...:.■ m .a��������a.�ja,a a�a 1 asa a,a,a...a,a a... ..s —.il 11111111 IlIlI ii I.._ . ._ air. 0% Cr- A pp -,_ , ra:Ei _ r— [71 - , , -:_- Conceptual Elevation 'D' Solo p..,,r BULDNVG TYPE 2 - 9 PLEX daft W.es ROOM Da OM ARE APPROXIMATE 1 6®ideiPt�OU 1_..u' S Pa WokMa a‹ at Vistoso 1 TrendWest Resort Properties corneae- 6 •« SIMS*-d ISM Oro Vaiwy, Arizona . algal.as n+w 4 Conceptual Floor Plan March v,we L — r-L ' - -- - _,.... 26- '"AFF I rs...... •e _ a (11C [ti ill j, in ■ rid0 O Ir4 — "Gm 5. , 11 11111 tiui ' IIiLr-7H '.\�c s _fIH „j �� , art-- -o /�F 11 ® 41. N Q. . . Mr_ ., Conceptual Elevation 'A' - k.54-a, .0. . . a 1 1ilMN !1 ICA 1 co i r r •■ I • 40 Cf .... ...co-iii--17"- Ilial II icil �� ,fci Mid -LV -�./ ��� *4uI •/�.1� - raw/ Z,Z• -,-• .. ....• . , . ......,-. III II - I" -, —` ! '14 - CL12-2 _ ri Ills ... °�"' 1M 1 , , ,,,,,*,,---1 l4i111.k Illsi ,..._ — . ill II I -1.1._.•..-1.-_- 1 "� ills - �u�ttfitt� y� ; = -- *.:ta.0, aIli ,l-,__/___ w m - simp+ C� -O_ AFy - - Conceptual Ebvatial '8' =1.0 ; .,., .,.,, Ii# [lig .420 e,......4. -____. .0010 !�; a --------- 26 ..0 A FF 0 . .° -.�- � 0 1 6 '' - J©, ` 6404 11111 0 0 -- iiii 11 1140-4* /0S 4' o rr � u AKEA CALCu.ATIONN "LONG TYPE g i Q 0 I ® ® ® — iiii) 1111 1:1 LNADIL�ARsh(fMt fbrr} i i r--t r-t r-t ._. CNNTA'A''etW 0 x e46 at 0 af. B D I I I 1 1 I I 1 �+� CAeI A V Mr IM xm' 1 x 792 at. 792 at Q, V_''- FF CMITA'C'tiro Drol oad 2 x 1.092 at. 2#04 at A �� CA RTA'D'lbw e++ivoaf 0 x tile,af. 0 at, Conceptual Elevation 'C' CMITA T Torek rre 0 x L77b at. 0 at. r.�..r.*v TOTAL MDT FLOOR 2496 at. IMAM AREM(.roars fb.r) CAetrA'A'SOW 0 x 646 at 0 at CANTA V'OM.Dairo..t 1 x 792 at 792 at CANTA'C''Tao Palmas' 2 x t002 at 2.104 at ,[� 2 t� C)'�/�FF CAEITA"P'11.w D.boai O x 1.290 at 0 wf. , 1 1 , ----------- 111318- «.2 CAeITA T Tailbone 0 x 1.776 at 0 at ��.■�i. ..r.a;,,,..,. LI NI r:::!:::;:i r:■:1:1■!.: ID TOTAL euO01D FLOOR 2,096 at. .....: .,.. TOTAL DIJ<DlNK3 AM�,�, 6.702 at. ��� � Alii111.11 � P I �® ® ®, �:� MO T T FLOOR AREAS(ENTKY&rA110) ` (I I MIRY 409 at, CA/RA'A' 0 af. — CAeRA V 96 at. CMITA VC(2 x 96 at.) En at —4 CARTA V -at, All CA61TA T -wt. � � - t ® ® ®TOTAL RMGT FLOOR COVE7REO AREA d97 af.COMM)eI GM FLOOR MILM MIRY 6 6ALCONY) I-I1111111 1 r-1 II! '' J . 1 ��^^tt NARY 406 at Mr+CAOIT 0 -v '�i� 9 A'0 6f w CA91A . Conceptual Elevation 'D' CAATA't'(2 x 96 at.) 1e6 at u.IMP. CAe1TA V -at CASITA T -at. TOTAL MOW FLOOR COMET,AREA 697 at. TOTAL DULLING AREA(COVERED) L004 atBUILDING TYP1E 7 X TOTAL WIDOW ARIA O6►MIS) 14792 at, war w.IOW TOTAL MUM AMA(DIME 6 COVERED) 7,1E41 at ROOM oIl►eFalola ME A4lROltsAAATE orthstar 0 bolt WokMar1< Vstoso TrendWest Resort Properties •oo comma Qo 115 1411b.ambers Oro Valley, Arizona INDOOR M www-rwas 11111=112—"•,"""rd Coacaptual poor Plan