Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOV139881 \t\ . \.\ '`.. \ \ EDCrE.iis- vCnEn+T • LTEM i##4N o.I,' D . NA )VAN IT Y DE SCRt:t P7lo N R BOULEVARtp Eva,c AI/ 1 45 4" R48 4o�la Rso o Pesrg L•�lE n ' 2 500� �z` WHITE Po�YESTE1t �PE 3 I 45 I Wn,rE REFLECTOts 1 `. R• 414 \ \ 1 .zit -p zo'-0 \\\ 4 \ r 4'- REowooa posT� S r►,�� zo APART \ .'` \ I I �z"(�tt ITG �.OP7 E \ON - _.____ , . .F .----:' I '�\6,.SAG O ( r REFI£cro4(s)(F'AC1.►c. RZoAO W0, . --'.---;:e._..--;.,F7.--7,7.-.--.-9" 7 //' /--'-''-'7--"-Ts7z,- 77-/-7-77-k):t-----7---------7-7;":"7--7--,------_______ , , //,/ s \ T ----" \ •,, Cr- 1 f 1 ,$8 \ I,DEEP !J�E Cnn.G2CT�S.OEvJALK COMMf-RCI AL. Con)STRJCrto1J DE.TAl L \ t \ ..\ q \ 94 Pr. Sr2EE-T LIGHT'(S) CONMEt2clP,L 5. STREET LIGHT CONTROL 5OX , C.NCRR1:TE Sms,,J ,Llc , 4 WAY STOP SIGN 6 a\A„,.. ' 4- UJAY STOP SIG N w;T11 STQEET SI GN '•• �� D.E. ORO VALLEY TOWN SIGN KIIOSK �( \ $ ~� \ 2 \ c..PC.V!,/ I`1NE F, T ELE�1 HOtJE EASER'IEn17 S I&N L (i) s:� l \ r&wTRY MONO MEW" G" STREET SIGN- "RANCHO VISTOSO BLVD, � 1 � ;�. / DOT SICrN- ' No SE�LIN(r OR Sp LICtTATIOtJ \ � I, SIGN - t'SPEED I.,.IMIT 4'S�� / EN TRY \ �, StG NS- " NO PaRkING" / ,I� 0 1 K. �1R►o W SIGN - STOP AHEAD / 0 \ \ Tt \ MoNuMT \ O � 0 \ I ENTRY a 7RANs. T 1 SCOPE OF PRO SECT MONUMENT \ _ Raw _i_ _ — J '' I -, I, !t.IsTr.LL BA - iEQ IN R/bJ EAT # WEsr OF__ RANCHO VISroSO BLVD, \ �' _ -'�� ^ BETIJEEN ENTQV fle”JVML.WT 3 T A•.1c,E•CLINE R,.. o• ,b ' -� o,.1-N Srat_t_ I3A0.21 Gt S..J R/ kk,... + OF TAN Ci=.INE (ZoAO \ l �0 r ' I �/ J� 3. Scr,RIFV }}yO0.DSEED ARF S MEHiNO FF F'r S. SEEDING- WILL RI„✓ f V CO �` Yi LY G2v VALLEY NATtV� 5EE0` MIX, W ,y , e0 rl j ., _ - S�,Q,Fy Arxc A �!' I $ ) DRY=��l -, \ 1 ' `v , v. ,‘ I.r ` w 4 II /fit j-\/ V .... , 6 , .... i 0 ( � 151-4 I'wsT►.� tna BQEt1l ..SEE I I�t y v .\ Ebt.t OF TRAVEL LII.nRG CowsTtuc.T.oN DEro.1L '--\ IysTpt� 1:?,►.�IUER-SEE '.r,, I CoN SrIVJGTtoN VETA1L EDC.E OF PAVE-Mawr9' 0 25' so' w, a INCH = 50 FEET p Pt� V I 5 T 0 SO , P , __ h `0 �6�R`N� COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION T - f --1{nn r, O - PROTECT; TP.NGERINE ►ROAD 1=.\1TRZANCE_ 1 9 0 =rtiPRAYEhEwTS - I1g6 MP,me,crEy BY LMR, ZNG, SCALE: AS NOTED -.-3_,....., NOTC-I.rERSCc'r.oN C..J Tito LLED LU ITH 4 WAy STbP SICrNs DRPWN 8Y: SILL F21E5 DATE.: AUG IZ, I998 V 1.0 1 'JJ'J <. J1YJJ.Y1U 11 Y A) ULIA11U[N • Profe5 it Association Management by LP Inc. Lewis Management Resources, Inc 7925 N. Oracle Road, #391, Tucson, AZ 85704 (520) 742-5674 Fax: (520) 742-1523 August 20, 1998 Ms. Valerie Feuer Senior Planner Town of Oro Valley 11,000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley, AZ 85737 • RE : Request for DRB Approval of Landscape Modifications NE and NW Corners of Rancho Vistoso Blvd. and Tangerine Road Dear Ms. Feuer: The Vistoso Community Association has been on the receiving end of many complaints from Rancho Vistoso residents regarding the appearance of the denuded areas in front of the RV entry monuments on either side of the boulevard, just north of Tangerine Road. We have also received complaints from residents that these areas are frequently used for parking by construction vehicles, bicyclists using the boulevard and the like. In an effort to maintain the beauty of the Rancho Vistoso community and to make the Tangerine Road entry into the project a focal point, the Association requests approval to erect unobtrusive fencing, in the form of posts and rope, to discourage parking, and to hydroseed the bare dirt with the Oro Valley-approved native seed mix. Twelve copies of a plan depicting these improvements are attached herewith. We have applied for approval from ADOT to work within its r.o.w. and we have also conferred with the Oro Valley Dept. of Public Works which, preliminarily, at any rate, has registered no objection. We understand that a license agreement with the Town and a permit from ADOT will be required before this work can commence. It would be appreciated if this item could be scheduled for the September 8th DRB agenda. Please advise as to the applicable fee and I will see that a check is delivered to you post haste. Letter to Ms. Feuer August 20, 1998 page 2 If you require further information, please contact our local Association Manager, Mr. Mark Lewis, 742-5 6 74. Sincerely, Mark Lewis Lewis Management Resources, Inc. for the Vistoso Community Association ML:If Gent by; LMM INUUNrUNAItu; 52UI421523; Aug-25-98 3:55; Page 1/1 To: ORO VALLEY (PLAN At: 742-1022 OVI3- 18-8 ( • w TOWN OF ORO VALLEY APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROJECT ARCHITECTURE . DATE: SiTIAR r OV CASE NO. : (office use only) PROJECT: v r a "irrn * b i isi1 .`r. A.° to • S .7l A LOCATION: GIS A?P ICANT: ADDRESS: op( tiJ�C� J t TELEPHONE NO, : I1. l`,S4;11 _ PROPERTY OWNER . ADDRESS: ecim . PHONE NQ. : 7 . PROJECT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: '40) $_ • ADDRESS: . _ _ DEVELOPME. REVIEW 'BOARD .. —MG DATE: a/M - -- S IGNATURE: - ��, DATE; 2-C 1 NOTE: Th s application must be accompanied by the required $150.00 fee and twelve copies of the plans, 11° x 17° in size, each to include dimensioned elevations of all structures from all four sides and a copy of the project's site plan. The submittal must also include a proposed for Ra et e far the project in an 8 .5" x 11" format, to include color chips of body and trim colors and tile color and style, if applicable. Building square footage is also required. AT THE MEETING, applicants must have on hand for presentation, colored perspective or rendered - elevations of all four sides of the structures. - ,. I. SUBMITTALS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AT LEAST 1.8 CALENDAR DAYS IN ADVANCE OF THE DESIRED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD HEARING DATE. Post-it"Fax Note 7671 r°1z se 01.1.,,;.re l r To From l..�r•' . ^ Co. pi. Co. Phones Phone w 63"rY" ' • -Fax* Fa" J .. ZO'd ZZOI EVG OZ5 XolLeA o-AO 40 umoj avt . t se-vz-BnV •` ♦ TOWN OF ORO VALLEY J COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: October 27, 1998 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Peter A. Cherberg,Planning Technician SUBJECT: OV13-98-81 RANCHO VISTOSO ENTRY MONUMENTS REVISED LANDSCAPE PLAN BACKGROUND: The Rancho Vistoso Entry Monuments site is located approximately 300 feet north of the intersection of Tangerine Road and Rancho Vistoso Blvd. The entry monuments are located on both the northeast and northwest sides of Rancho Vistoso Blvd. The property referred to in this report is composed of two areas that are located on the northeast and northwest sides of the entrance to Rancho Vistoso Blvd and run north from Tangerine Road (SR 989) up to the border of the entry monuments. This property is in the right-of-way of Tangerine Road and is managed by ADOT. SUMMARY: The Vistoso Community Association is requesting Town Council approval to perform landscaping on the northeast and northwest sides of the entrance to Rancho Vistoso Blvd that lead up to the entry monuments. The Association has received complaints regarding the appearance of this unimproved area and the fact that construction workers have been parking their vehicles there. In an effort to improve the appearance of this area,the association requests approval to erect unobtrusive fencing, in the form of posts and rope, to discourage parking, and to hydroseed the bare dirt with the Oro Valley approved native seed mix. Landscape maintenance of the site will be performed by the personnel currently employed by Vistoso Partners. The Association has obtained approval from ADOT to work within its right-of-way, with the stipulation that the fence posts are are positioned a minimum of 30 feet from the edge of the paved roadways. The Oro Valley Department of Public Works is still in the process of considering this proposal. This revised landscape plan was approved by the DRB on September 8, 1998. RECOMMENDATION: Planning Staff finds that the revision proposed is compatible with the existing landscaping at Rancho Vistoso and complies with the General Plan, Community Design Element Policy 9.1H: "preserve, restore, and enhance the ecological and scenic qualities of the natural landscape." As such, we recommend approval of this request as part of this evening's agenda, with the suggested conditions in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. .r •f TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 2 SUGGESTED MOTIONS: The Town Council may wish to consider one of the following motions: I move to approve OV13-98-81, the Rancho Vistoso Entry Monuments Revised Landscape Plan, subject to those conditions listed in Exhibit"A" attached herewith. OR I move to approve OV13-98-81, the Rancho Vistoso Entry Monuments Revised Landscape Plan, subject to those conditions listed in Exhibit "A" attached herewith and the following added conditions: OR I move to deny OV 13-98-81, the Rancho Vistoso Entry Monuments Revised Landscape Plan, finding that: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Exhibit"A" 2. Plot Plan and Elevations 1 I i ` < • P, . in d Zoning Administrator .1) aCo unity 1I e e Direct•r ci Town Mana er F:\OV\OV 13\1998\13-98-81\LPTC.rpt Exhibit"A" Conditions of Approval OV13-98-81 Rancho Vistoso Entry Monuments Revised Landscape 1. Approval of this request is required from Oro Valley Department of Public Works. 2. A license agreement will be required for landscaping in the right-of-way. MINUTES OF THE ORO VALLEY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING Tuesday September 8, 1998 CALL TO ORDER: 6:05 p.m. ROLL CALL: Present Patti Jo Lewis, Chair Barry Allen,Member Mary Glueck,Member Richard Underwood,Member Verlin Smith,Member Nancy Mager,Member Jim Vogelsberg, Member Others Present: Valerie Feuer, Senior Planner Paul Nzomo, Engineer Shirley Gay, Clerk MINUTES MOTION: Moved, seconded (Underwood/Smith) and carried by a 6-0 vote to approve the minutes of the July 28th and August 11th 1998 Development Review Board meeting as written. CONSENT AGENDA A. OV12-96-3A RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 11 PARCELS H AND N LANDSCAPE PLAN B. OV13-98-59 RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 7F HORTON HOMES MODEL 1659 C. OV13-98-80 CHASE CUSTOM HOME, BIGHORN POINT, LA RESERVE, LOT 10 D. OV12-95-17 LA CHOLLA ESTATES REVISED LANDSCAPE PLAN E. NO ITEM F. OV12-98-6 MOONRIDGE LANDSCAPE PLAN G. OV13-95-44 CANOA BUILDERS, RANCHO VISTOSO PARCEL 7G, MESQUITE CREST,4 MODELS H. OV13-98-72 A.F. STERLING VISTOSO HEIGHTS MODEL 2842 OPTIONS , 9-08-98 Development Review Board Minutes Page 2 I. OV13-98-81 RANCHO VISTOSO TANGERINE ROAD ENTRY MONUMENTS LANDSCAPE PLAN MOTION: Moved, seconded (Smith/Allen) and carried by a 6-0 (Glueck absent) vote to approved consent agenda items A thru I. Richard Underwood excused himself due to a conflict of interest on item J. J. OV12-97-17 RESURRECTION LUTHERAN CHURCH REVISED LANDSCAPE PLAN MOTION: Moved, seconded (Vogelsberg/Mager) and carried by a 5-0 vote (Glueck/Underwood absent) to approve Consent Agenda item J. Member Underwood and Member Glueck joined the meeting. REGULAR AGENDA OV12-93-13 CANADA VERDE APARTMENTS REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND REVISED ARCHITECTURE Valerie Feuer introduced the staff report into the record. The development plan approved in 1994 by Town Council preceded the Golf Course Overlay Zone. However, since the request to remove patio golf course screens is the current issue for the DRB, the current zoning code is relevant. The only encroachment of the Golf Course Overlay Zone as it relates to this development is the center fairway distance for golf hole number 3 (a 2 foot encroachment). While at the site visit, Staff observed three golfers tee off from this golf hole and the center fairway encroachment was not a hazard. The slope changes from the golf course to apartment buildings and preserved native vegetation provides for adequate buffering. Valerie Feuer has asked the developer to submit to staff a revised development plan showing the footprint that is now proposed for the lower recreation area and is going to be put in to place. Hank Nelson, was present representing the applicant. Member Smith asked Mr. Nelson where number two t-box was and Mr. Nelson pointed out on the plan where that location was. Member Mager asked if these apartments were age restricted, as she was concerned about children playing on the patios and possibly being hit by golf balls. Mr. Nelson assured Member Mager that the patios were far enough away from the course that safety was not an issue. Larry Kreis, 10500 N. Stargazer, commented he would like the Canada Hills Master Association to 9-08-98 Development Review Board Minutes Page 3 review the development plan before it goes to Town Council. Member Smith commented if it goes before the Master Association and the plans are modified he felt it should come back to DRB before it goes to Town Council. Other DRB members agreed. Valerie Feuer clarified that the removal of screens is a development plan revision not an architectural revision. MOTION: Moved, seconded (Underwood/Smith) and carried by a 7-0 vote to recommend approval of OV12-93-13, Golf Villas at Oro Valley (formerly Canada Verde 4 Apartments) removal of patio golf course screens and lower pool with bath house architecture subject to staff conditions. Planning and Zoning Conditions: 1. A revised Development Plan must be submitted which illustrates the new design of the lower pool and bathhouse area. This re-submittal must be made prior to the Town Council meeting,which will review this project. 2. The same Golf Course Overlay Zone analysis shall occur upon completion of buildings 11 and 12. If these buildings meet the setback requirements, it will be approved administratively by the Planning and Zoning Administrator. 3. Approval by Canada Hills Architecture Committee and if there are any changes or modifications the plan must come before DRB before going to Town Council. OV12-98-14 RANCHO CATALINA OFFICES DEVELOPMENT PLAN Valerie Feuer introduced the staff report into the record. VCI Development proposed to build two office buildings totaling 9,948 square feet. The buildings are separated by an open courtyard consisting of existing native plants and additional trees and shrubs. This development plan complies with the parking and setback requirements for a commercial site in a residentially zoned area. Since the project site is along Oracle Road and in an R-6 zone, the residential development regulations of the Oracle Road Scenic Corridor Overlay District requirements apply. Currently, a portion of a circular driveway serving the Dome Building is located on the Smith Family property, and one of the site designs maintains the exiting driveway, providing circulation between the two sites. It was discussed at the Board of Adjustment Hearing on June 23, 1998 that there should be shared access between the Smith commercial site and the "Dome" building. The Board of Adjustment approved the variance to permit site access off or Oracle Road that is less than the required 660 feet separation between access points. The owner of the Dome Building has agreed t have a shared access between the two properties. Paul Nzomo introduced the engineer's report into the record. He explained that the site would be served by a single access point at Oracle Road. At the request of the Arizona Department of Transportation this access point shall be shared with the property to the south that is presently developed as the Dome Building. The access point currently serving the Dome Building will be 9-08-98 Development Review Board Minutes Page 4 eliminated at a time determined by ADOT. No off-site improvements to Oracle Road are required. The 1.58 acre development is affected by offsite flows that originate from the east. The offsite flow is accepted through a curb cut at the east end of the parking area access lane. The flow is split at that point to allow the drainage to continue within the inverted crown of the PAAL and also through the landscaped area between the two easterly parking areas. This offsite flow is discharged through curb cuts on the south side of the site. The site will be graded to accommodate the construction of the buildings, parking area and travel lanes, the retention/detention basin and the collection of the offsite drainage flows. Slopes shown on the west side of Building#1 are 2:1. The slopes will require rock rip rap treatment. Additional grading and construction details will be necessary to accommodate the control of the drainage flows to the proper outlet location. Rick Bright, Architect, representing the applicant was present to answer questions. Member Underwood asked who would maintain the landscaping along the driveway. Mr. Nzomo replied it should be between the two property owners. Mr. Bright commented that the quantity of water runoff has been reduced off-site but the water is running faster because of the pavement and that may cause some problems. Mr. Nzomo suggested rip rap. Mr. Bright commented that the concern is what happens to the property next door. Member Glueck felt these issues needed to be dealt with in order to support approval. She suggested the details of drainage needed to be taken care of and then brought back to DRB for approval. Member Underwood commented that it is not going to be approved by staff until all conditions are met anyway. Valerie confirmed that was correct, all conditions have to be met before it goes to Town Council. MOTION: Moved, seconded (Underwood/Allen) and carried by a 6-1 vote (Glueck opposed) to recommend approval of OV12-98-14, Rancho Catalina Offices Development Plan subject to staff conditions: Planning and Zoning Conditions: 1. The general notes shall be located on the upper left corner below the title. 2. Label the widths of the buffer yards and exact location on all sheets of the development plan. 3. Add a general note stating that the maximum height of all buildings is two stores (25 feet). It shall also specify the building heights for this development. 4. Be sure to correct spelling and grammatical errors on the general notes. 5. Regarding water service for this development plan, a general note must be added stating: "The developer shall be required to submit a water master plan identifying water use, fire flow requirements and all major on-site water facilities and the proposed connection points to the existing water system. Any Specific Area Plan Fees, Protected Main Fees, and/or other needed facilities' costs are to be paid by the developer." 6. A copy of the recorded agreement, with the owner(s) of the Dome Building site, that addresses the access location, location of the construction, items to be constructed and 9-08-98 Development Review Board Minutes Page 5 the responsible party noted on Sheet 2 of the Grading Plan shall be provided prior to Town Council approval of the Development Plan. 7. The 2:1 slopes on the west side of Building#1 shall be duly noted. 8. Where rip rap is to be placed,placement of filter fabric shall be included. 9. General Note 16 of the Development Plan and General Grading Note 29 of the Preliminary Grading Plan shall be expanded to add the following: and the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised, Chapter 14. 10. General Note 4 shall be revised to note the actual natural open space that is being provided and the improved open space being provided. 11. The words Loading Zone shall be removed from the Concept Site Plan on the Cover Sheet of the Preliminary Grading Plan. 12. Grading within the Handicapped Parking shall be revised to meet ADA standards. 13. The leader showing the revegetated area at the basin shall be revised so that it does not include the 2:1 slopes west of Building#1. 14. The spot elevations on the plans shall be checked and revised if necessary to provide the grades shown on the plan and the plan details. 15. Proposed contours shall be revised to show all vertical and horizontal grade breaks. 16. The collection and dispersing of drainage on the east side of Building #1 shall be clarified. 17. The location of the curb to outlet the 18.1 cfs from the landscaped area shall be shown on the grading plan and the Development Plan shall be revised to show the two outlet locations and their respective flows. 18. The Q100 flow at the inlet of the entrance pipes shall be noted on the plan. 19. Roadway design shall be per Town of Oro Valley Subdivision Street Standards. 20. A dimension shall be provided for Cross Section A-A, and the height and type of curb verified. 21. The Outlet Weir Detail shall be revised to reflect the basin design shown on the plan. 22. The Final Grading Plan shall include grading and construction details and minor adjustments to the grading design to further clarify proposed improvements and direct the drainage concept plan. 23. A Final Drainage Report shall be provided that includes hydrology and hydraulic calculations for the final drainage concept plan. 24. Conditions 1 through 23 and any additional DRB conditions shall be revised prior to scheduling the plan for Town Council. 25. Record access agreement between the to parties on development plan. 26. Required maintenance agreement of shared access between the two parties. OV12-98-14 RANCHO CATALINA OFFICES LANDSCAPE PLAN Valerie introduced the staff report into the record. She explained that the landscape plan complies with the provisions set forth in Chapter 14 of the OVZC. Bufferyard C will be used along the north and east sides of the property. Bufferyard D is planned for the front of the property facing Oracle 9-08-98 Development Review Board Minutes Page 6 Road. This bufferyard will be 25 feet wide with a 40" high berm. The landscape plan is salvaging significant native plants that will provide for a more aesthetic project. It will ensure that sufficient landscaping will occur throughout the site. A minimum 6 foot masonry wall is required along with the 10 foot wide bufferyard. The maintenance of the landscape material and irrigation systems will be the responsibility of the property owner. Rick Bright, Architect, was present representing the applicant to answer questions. Member Underwood asked which were mesquite trees on the landscape plan as they were not marked. Member Underwood stated the trees should be marked and identified on the landscape plan. He asked that this requirement be made a condition of approval. Member Underwood also expressed he would like to see an irrigation detail on the plans that showed emitter placement on the trees as the mesquite trees are not planted deep enough and when high winds come along they fall over. He explained that the emitter should be placed at the drip line with a chimney and a four inch pipe filled with gravel with an emitter coming into it on top that goes down to the root ball, so it will force the growth downward. Member Glueck commented that the wall should be broken up with wrought iron or stepped down to add detail. Member Smith asked what the color of the wall was, as it was not listed. He suggested listing the color of the wall on the plan be made a condition. Member Underwood suggestion painting the wall with a graffiti resistant paint. Member Underwood commented the walls should not block the views to Push Ridge. MOTION: Moved, seconded (Underwood/Vogelsberg) and carried by a 7-0 vote to recommend approval of OV12-98-14, Rancho Catalina Offices Landscape Plan subject to staff conditions. Planning and Zoning Conditions: 1. Label the widths of the buffer yards and exact location on the landscape plan. 2. Illustrate on the landscape plan where rip rap will occur. Hydroseeding rip rap is not necessary. 3. The landscape plan shall state that a minimum six-foot high masonry wall will be constructed for parking facilities located adjacent to residentially zoned properties. Varied elevations incorporating wrought iron and steps of the wall preserving the view where possible and include color of masonry wall. This condition relates to the northern and eastern boundaries of the property. 4. The 2:1 slopes on the west side of Building#1 shall be duly noted. 5. Where rip rap is to be placed,placement of filter fabric shall be included. 6. Conditions 1 through 5 and any additional DRB conditions shall be revised prior to scheduling the plan for Town Council. 7. Identify trees and sizes on landscape plan. 8. Irrigation detail on trees showing drip lines, 4 emitters, 2 at drip line, chimney for transferring water to the bottom of the hole for root longevity. 9-08-98 Development Review Board Minutes Page 7 OV12-98-09 TRENDWEST RESORT DEVELOPMENT PLAN Valerie Feuer introduced the staff report into the record. Mirage Homes propose to build a 111 unit timeshare resort, clustered in twenty buildings dispersed through the 12.04 acres of the site to be developed. The development will have vehicular access off of Hidden Springs Drive, and will have 199 parking spaces provided for the visitors to the resort. The development will also feature 4.77 acres of natural open space preserved in the wash to the west of the site, and 7.73 acres of recreational facilities. The proposed resort falls within the MHDR use designated for the site in the PAD, which was amended by Town Council on August 19th, 1998 for this project. Valerie stated that item one of the conditions will be deleted. Paul Nzomo introduced the engineers report into the record. The main road serving this site will be Hidden Springs Drive. A second access point is provided at Pebble Creek Drive. The minor resort designation is expected to generate 666 trips per day. The site drains to the east and west. There are minimal areas along the flood plain limit where proposed construction might encroach the flood plain. Any encroachment of the flood plain will require that scour potential and bank protection be addressed and implemented where necessary. Twelve acres will be graded to construct the resort buildings and amenities. Rock rip rap channels will carry flow from the paved areas or around the buildings to the channels. Retaining walls are located on the site to alleviate the grade differential between the buildings and recreation amenities as well as from the amenities to the developable limit line. Member Underwood asked if there will be a bike path in and through the resort as well as a pedestrian pathway. Gary Martinsen, Owner of Mirage Homes, replied yes. Mr. Martinsen showed the Board how the resort would look when finished. He explained that the units would sit on one and a quarter acres while the recreation area is seven and one half acres. There are several spas in the area, a Basketball court, Tennis courts, a pool for children as well as adults, and a playground area making the resort a great place for families. Mr. Martinsen asked the Board if the bike racks could be dispersed throughout the facility. The Board did not have a problem with that request. Member Glueck asked if there were any carports or garages. Mr. Martinsen replied there would be no carports or garages. MOTION: Moved, seconded (Mager/Glueck) and carried by a 7-0 vote to recommend approval of OV12-98-09,Trendwest Resort Development Plan subject to Staff conditions: Planning and Zoning Conditions: • conformance wit the Town Council conditions for approval for the Rancho Vistoso � . rsai-rvz > > �i • 9-08-98 Development Review Board Minutes Page 8 resolved to Staffs satisfaction. 2. The Book Page notation in the upper right hand corner of development plan shall parallel and horizontal to text and drawings of the development plan, in the same manner as the same notation in the lower right hand corner. 3. Amend the zoning stated in General Note#3 to read "Rancho Vistoso PAD-MHDR". 4. Label the widths of the buffer yards on all sheets of the development plan. 5. Indicate the zoning of adjacent properties in 'ghosted' lettering on the development plan. 6. Add a general note stating that the maximum height of all buildings is two stories (30'). 7. Add a general note stating the maximum density of 5.9 RAC, as per the conditions of Town Council for the Rancho Vistoso PAD Amendment for this project, dated August 19th' 1998. 8. As per the requirements of the OVZCR, provide 16 bicycle-parking spaces- 12 Class I and 4 Class II spaces- . 9. The location of the drainage pipe beneath Hidden Springs Drive shall be coordinated with the engineer of the Hidden Springs Drive and Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 10, Parcel N projects. 10. The applicant and/or his engineer shall work with Town staff to adjust the site elevations to not only promote site individuality but also provide conformity with the surrounding roadways and developments. 11. A public drainage easement, recorded by separate instrument, shall be provided at the pipe inlet west of the Hidden Springs right-of-way. 12. All easements noted on the Development Plan shall include the recordation data or in the case of proposed easements, be record prior to occupancy of the site. Copies of the recorded easements shall be provided to the Town of Oro Valley Planning and Zoning Department. 13. The tangent noted on the centerline of Pebble Creek Drive shall be corrected from N54 00 OOE to N36 00 00W. 14. Swale sections A-A and B-B shall be revised to agree with the drainage report, shall note that the side slopes will be grouted rip rap, and additional details provided that describe thickness of grout and depth of embedment. 15. A revised drainage report shall be submitted that reflects the proposed site drainage design and includes, but is not limited to, scour calculations, bank protection location and design, pipe calculations for the newly located pipe, correction of Section IV. Onsite Drainage Plan to correctly note the proposed design for collecting the easterly flows, and a clarification of the flows, water surface elevation and limits of the flood plain for the Highlands Wash tributary. 16. A note shall be added to the General Notes as follows: The improvements for Hidden Springs Drive from the existing end of pavement to a connection with Klinger Canyon Drive shall be completed to the request for occupancy of the site. 17. Conditions 1 through 16, and any additional DRB conditions, shall be submitted with the revised development plan,prior to scheduling the plan for Town Council. . 9-08-98 Development Review Board Minutes Page 9 OV12-98-09 TRENDWEST RESORT LANDSCAPE PLAN Request from Gary Martinsen to continue this until the October 13th, 1998,DRB meeting. MOTION: Moved, seconded (Smith/Glueck) and carried by a 7-0 vote to continue OV12-98- 09 Trendwest Resort landscape Plan until October 13th,1998 DRB meeting. OV12-98-04 VISTOSO GOLF CASITAS LANDSCAPE PLAN Upon recommendation from Staff, due to a conflict between the landscaping and rip rap, this item was continued to the October 13th 1998. DRB meeting MOTION: Moved, seconded (Smith/Glueck) and carried by a 7-0 vote to continue OV12-98- 04 Vistoso Golf Casitas Landscape Plan to October 13th 1998,DRB meeting. ELECTIONS OF OFFICERS AND APPOINTMENT OF AGENDA COMMITTEE Valerie informed the Board they needed to elect a Chair and Vice Chair for DRB Mary Glueck nominated Patti Lewis for Chair, seconded by Richard Underwood and carried by a 7- 0 vote. Nancy Mager nominated Mary Glueck for Vice Chair, seconded by Richard Underwood and carried by a 7-0 vote. Valerie stated that two members were needed for the agenda committee. Jim Vogelsberg and Nancy Mager volunteered for the positions Planning Staff Report: Valerie informed the Board that there would be two special DRB meetings one September 22nd and the second on October 27th at 6:00 p.m. Valerie stated that the Arizona Planning Association holds a conference in October and the Town sends members from the various Boards. She asked who was interested in attending from the DRB this year. Several Board members expressed that is was a very good conference and very informative. Jim Vogelsberg commented he would be interested in going. Valerie reminded the Board of the upcoming Design Guidelines meeting on September 15, 1998 at 6:00 p.m. MOTION: Moved, seconded (Smith/Underwood) and carried by a 7-0 vote to adjourn the Development Review Board meeting at 8:30 PM. 9-08-98 Development Review Board Minutes Page 10 Shirley Gay DRB Clerk CONSENT I I'EM I TOWN OF ORO VALLEY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD REPORT MEETING DA'1'E: September 8, 1998 TO: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD FROM: Peter A. Cherberg, Planning Technician SUBJECT: OV13-98-81 RANCHO VISTOSO ENTRY MONUMENTS REVISED LANDSCAPE PLAN BACKGROUND: The Rancho Vistoso Entry Monuments site is located approximately 300 feet north of the intersection of Tangerine Road and Rancho Vistoso Blvd. The entry monuments are located on both the northeast and northwest sides of Rancho Vistoso Blvd. The property referred to in this report is composed of two areas that are located on the northeast and northwest sides of the entrance to Rancho Vistoso Blvd and run north from Tangerine Road (SR 989) up to the border of the entry monuments. This property is in the right-of-way of Tangerine Road and is managed by ADOT. SUMMARY: The Vistoso Community Association is requesting DRB approval to perform landscaping on the northeast and northwest sides of the entrance to Rancho Vistoso Blvd that lead up to the entry monuments. The Association has received complaints regarding the appearance of this unimproved area and the fact that construction workers have been parking their vehicles there. In an effort to improve the appearance of this area, the association requests approval to erect unobtrusive fencing, in the form of posts and rope, to discourage parking, and to hydroseed the bare dirt with the Oro Valley approved native seed mix. The Association has applied for approval from ADOT to work within its right-of-way and has conferred with the Oro Valley Department of Public Works on the issue. GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE: This plan complies with the General Plan's Community Design Element policies, in that,the landscape improvements requested will help preserve, restore, and enhance the ecological and scenic qualities of the natural landscape and mitigate the negative visual impacts of the site. • Exhibit "A" Conditions of Approval OV13-98-81 Rancho Vistoso Entry Monuments Revised Landscape 1. Approval of this request is required from both ADOT and Oro Valley Department of Public Works. 2. A site maintenance plan is required, as the areas that are hydroseeded will have to be weeded. 3. A license agreement will be required for landscaping in the right-of-way.