Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOV139946 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PLANNING &ZONING DIVISION 11,000 N.LA CANADA DRIVE,ORO VALLEY AZ 85737 Phone: (520)797-9797 Fax: (520)742-1022 APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROJECT ARCHITECTURE DATE: '' 22 OV CASE NO.: 'U 15"99 4- (office use only) PROJECT: M02tAi t/0/46- #2 30tae3 iV sT QOIET SP2/i4s 134 LOCATION: 1- 7 I N HeeigHt23,0 /1 APPLICANT• e CcCik--6 /772. Pc$/G, /2�jV//V/ ADDRESS: CP42 G{/. 5/L 6 t;4-G4C5Cader PARCEL NUMBER: l4 # ,I, IA7T S 1 " /31 TELEPHONE NO.: 4 9�./GV 7 FAX NO.: �^ PROPERTY OWNER: MI LG ,N/OM /-oM&S ,i NI we Zet-rl,+i'( ADDRESS: 5 1 el 5 &A 3r )2-0.41P . #/o2 PHONE NO.: 75 i 214 PROJECT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: e• /25/C/A/ /9LAVA/Miel ADDRESS: ( '42 W. Sg-1/5 - -jGE Coue.7 ' ( OO7( ) DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD HEARING DATE: C611't t l SIGNA1 : P DATE: 7' 22' g NOTE: 's a cation must be accompanied by the required $150.00 fee and twelve copies of the plans, 11" x 17" in size, each to include dimensioned elevations of all structures from all four sides and a copy of the project's site plan. The submittal must also include a proposed color palette for the project in an 8.5" x 11" format, to include color chips of body and trim colors and tile color and style, if applicable. Building square footage is also required. AT THE MEETING, applicants must have on hand for presentation, colored perspective or rendered elevations of all four sides of the structures. SUBMITTALS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AT LEAST 18 CALENDAR DAYS IN ADVANCE OF THE DESIRED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD HEARING DATE. \\oV PZD\PZ1\ADMIN\FORMS\DRBPROJARCHAPP.doc 41VA nQ ,fo MINUTES OF THE ORO VALLEY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING Tuesday August 10th, 1999 CALL TO ORDER: 6:10 p.m. ROLL CALL: Present Patti Jo Lewis, Chair Mary Glueck, Vice Chair Jim Vogelsberg,Member Bruce Enger,Member Nancy Mager,Member Absent Barbara Bell,Member Richard Underwood,Member Others Present: Valerie Feuer, Senior Planner Shirley Gay,DRB Clerk Craig Civalier, Engineer PE MOTION: Moved,Seconded(Enger/Mager) and carried by a 5-0 vote to approve the July 13th, 1999 Development Review Board Meeting Minutes as written CONSENT AGENDA A. OV13-99-45 Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 11 H&N Custom Home, Lot 74 B. OV13-99-46 Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 11 H&N Model 2880,Lot 51 C. OV13-99-47 Naranja Ranch, Lybeck Custom Home,Lot 74 D. OV13-99-48 Naranja Ranch, Dagen Custom Home, Lot 62 E. OV13-99-49 Naranja Ranch, Rulney Custom Home,Lot 49 F. OV13-99-50 Naranja Ranch, Valdenegro Custom Home, Lot 43 G. OV13-99-54 Naranja Ranch, Elrod Custom Home, Lot 42 08-10-99 Development Review Board Minutes Page 2 H. OV13-99-55 Naranja Ranch, Schrick Custom Home, Lot 54 I. OV13-95-17 Rancho Vistoso NB 5 T, Pulte Homes Model 2842, Lots 17 & 77 J. OV13-99-53 Ironwood Canyon,Wachiwiak Room Addition,Lot 39 K. OV13-97-07 Rancho Vistoso 5U, Safeway Vistoso Plaza Shop Bldg. C L. OV13-97-68 Rancho Vistoso NB 10M, Maravilla, Baird Homes, Plan 5 M. OV13-99-25 Rancho Vistoso NB 10J,Inn at Vistoso,Accessory Buildings N. OV13-99-44 Oro Valley Retail Center Block 8 Architecture O. OV12-99-08 Oro Valley Retail Center Block 8 Landscape Plan P. OV12-99-10 Rancho Vistoso 10N Model Home Complex Landscape Plan Q. OV12-98-1A Rancho Vistoso NB 11 Stone Canyon Golf Course Temporary Clubhouse and Recreation Center Landscape Plan R. OV13-99-56 Hippauf Front Room Addition, 1605 N. Crown Ridge Way, Sun City Chair Lewis pulled item K as there would be discussion and asked if any other items needed pulled for discussion and Member Glueck asked if item N and 0 could be pulled as she had questions on those items. Member Glueck asked if anyone was present to speak on item D. Mr. Lybeck approached the podium and was in agreement to tone down the Terra Cota to be consistent with what is in the neighborhood. MOTION: Moved, seconded (Vogelsberg/Glueck) and carried by a 5-0 vote to recommend approval of Consent Items A-J,L thru M, and P thru R and stipulating item D tone down the Terra Cota. Item K, Valerie Feuer commented that the applicant had resubmitted plans to show the doors in the back of the building. Also an added condition from staff was to add the tile accent on the back of the building,which was done. MOTION: Moved, seconded (Glueck/Mager) and carried by a 5-0 vote to recommend approval of Item K of the Consent Agenda subject to staff conditions. Item N,Member Glueck wanted to add a condition that the colors match the existing building. MOTION: Moved, seconded (Mager/Glueck) and carried by a 5-0 vote to recommend approval of Item N of the Consent Agenda subject to staff conditions and stipulating an added condition #5, color matches existing building. Item 0, Member Glueck had a question on the landscape plan. Mr. Hulsey, WLB,was present for questions. Member Glueck asked about item 3 of the staff conditions. Valerie Feuer commented that was added to clean up the planting plan legend. Member Glueck then questioned item 5 of staff conditions. Valerie Feuer commented that this was added so that the landscaping on each pad would be consistent. Member Glueck also had a question about condition 6, who would maintain the landscaping? Mr. Hulsey replied by the master developer or until the association takes over. MOTION: Moved, seconded (Glueck/Vogelsberg) and carried by a 5-0 vote to recommend approval of Consent Item 0 08-10-99 Development Review Board Minutes Page 3 REGULAR AGENDA PREVIEW: FIRST AVENUE AND LAMBERT LANE SLOPE STABILIZATION Bill Jansen, Town engineer introduced his report into the record. The Public Works Department is planning a slope stabilization at the intersection of First Avenue and Lambert Lane. Which would be the northwest corner. The project will include the import and placement of fill, the placement of rock rip-rap and erosion control fabrics, seeding with native plants, planting of trees, and the installation of an irrigation system. This commitment was made by the Town to take care of this corner when the county was finished with their work. Don McGaan, McGaan and Associates provided an overview and location of the project. He briefly discussed the improvements that need to be made. He asked for comments from the DRB to incorporate into the final plan. Member Mager asked how long would this project take. Mr. McGaan replied approximately 60 days. Member Vogelsberg asked was this project in this year's budget. Mr. Jansen commented that the project was supplemented in this year's CIP budget. PUBLIC HEARING: OV13-99-40 GRADING WAIVER,LOT 34,WILDRIDGE Mr. Jansen introduced the engineer's report into the record. Cella Barr Associates is requesting a grading waiver for construction of a single family resident for lot 34 in the Wild Ridge Estates. The waiver is required because some of the proposed depths of cut and fill necessary to construct the new home and driveway will result in terracing exceeding 8 feet by 3 feet. As per article 15- 401 A, the proposed cuts and fills, if properly constructed and stabilized, present no obvious safety hazard. Portion of the cut slopes exceeding Article 15-401 standards will be visible from the adjacent street, Copper Spring Trail Drive. Public Works department staff has reviewed the grading waiver request for the proposed single family residence, and recommends approval. Warren Thompson, Cellar Barr Associates, representing Genesee, was present for questions. He provided a site plan on the overview to show the lot in relationship to other lots around it. He stated that this house is 10 feet below the street. He commented that by the topography the lot is about 15 feet below finished floor elevation. Mr. Thompson commented that item four of the staff comments, he would like to have that removed he is not sure where that came from this house is not intended for handicap people. . Mr. Jansen replied Paul Nzomo wrote up the report and was not sure himself how that came about. Member Glueck asked what part of the plans needed the waiver. Mr. Thompson commented that the waiver was for two retaining walls. Member Enger asked how much was explored at building the house at various levels. Mr. Thompson replied he has worked extensively at trying to get this house to fit on the lot without the waiver and he felt it could not be done. Valerie Feuer commented that it is not often a custom home is brought before the Board asking for a variance, this is unusual. 08-10-99 Development Review Board Minutes Page 4 MOTION: Moved, seconded (Vogelsberg/Mager) and carried by a 5-0 vote to recommend approval for OV13-99-40 Grading Waiver, Single Family Residence Lot 34, Wild Ridge, subject to staff conditions and stipulating item 4 of staff comments be deleted. PUBLIC HEARING: OV12-96-7 GRADING WAIVER, WALGREENS INGRESS AND EGRESS ON LAMBERT LANE Bill Jansen introduced the engineer's report into the record. The applicant is requesting a variance to allow a maximum depth of the cut of 9 feet instead of 6 feet. This cut will occur at the toe of slope on the north side off the roadway, approximately 460 feet west of the centerline of La Canada Drive. This grading exception will allow construction of a left and right-turn access to and from the Walgreens and Children's World. It addresses more adequately a public safety issue for people making illegal left turns into the Walgreens site via the existing right-in only access. Bruce Paton, Rick Engineering, was present for questions. He commented he was in agreement with staff conditions. Member Glueck commented there are problems with illegal turns now. Won't this create more problems? Mr. Paton replied there would be a traffic control island that will help. The delivery trucks will continue to make right turns from La Canada only, as they have been instructed and this is enforced by Walgreens. PUBLIC HEARING OPENED: Jerry Roberts, 10280 N. Camino Valedeflores, expressed his concern about the safety factor and visibility. He felt that the waiver should wait until the improvements are made to widen Lambert Lane. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED: Member Mager asked how long will the construction time take. Mr. Paton replied approximately 60 to 90 days. Member Vogelsberg asked who was paying for this project. Mr. Paton stated that Walgreens is paying for this project. Member Glueck expressed her concern about safety. She felt the left turn off of Lambert would be dangerous. Member Glueck explained she would like to see a comprehensive plan for this corner instead of seeing changes coming back before the Board. MOTION: Moved, seconded (Mager/Enger) and carried by a 3-2 vote (Glueck/Lewis opposed) to recommend approval of the Grading Exception Request for Walgreen's at the Northwest Corner of La Canada/Lambert Lane, OV12-96-07 STAFF CONDITIONS: 1. Improvement plans for Lambert Lane widening shall be submitted to Town Engineer's office for review and approval. 2. Slope stability from a Geotechnical engineer is required. 08-10-99 Development Review Board Minutes Page 5 3. Striping and sign plan is required. Be sure to include "NO TRUCK TURNING" signs at the driveway exit. 4. Drainage ditch and concrete header for the entire length of pavement added to Lambert Lane is required. 5. Landscape plan for the 6' bench shall be submitted to Planning and Zoning for review and approval. 6. A flashing yellow light shall be installed at least 1500 feet west of the driveway along Lambert Lane. 7. No left turn from the driveway into eastbound traffic on Lambert Lane will be allowed. 8. Drainage statement demonstrating how the flows from Lambert Lane will be conveyed into the catch basin is required. 9. Modified slurry seal shall be applied over the entire width of Lambert Lane along the length of the new pavement. 10. No truck sign shall be installed on the driveway off Lambert Lane. OV13-99-51 RIVERS EDGE SUBDIVISION, KE&G MODELS 1629, 1740, 1829, 1839, 1944, 1949, 2197, and 2467 Valerie Feuer introduced the staff report into the record. The models range in size from 1629 square feet to 2467 square feet of living space, and all the models except Model 2467 are single story homes. All the models are of a southwestern contemporary architectural style, and feature tiled roofs, wainscotting, corbels, architecturally framed windows and entryways, keystone, inset windows, arched picture windows, and popouts. Staff finds these models to be compatible with other models in the subdivision, which feature similar architectural styles and details and recommends approval subject to staff conditions. Rick Cook, representing K E & G commented he had no problems with staff conditions and was available for questions. MOTION: Moved, seconded (Enger/Glueck) and carried by a 5-0 vote to recommend approval of OV13-99-51 KE&G Model 1629, 1740, 1829, 1839, 1944, 1949, 2197, and 2467 Rivers Edge Subdivision, subject to staff conditions. Staff Conditions: 1. Windows shall either be recessed or popped out, except where under a porch. 2. Spark arrestors shall be camouflaged with a cap. 3. Ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be enclosed by a wall to provide visual screening and noise. 4. The color palette for these models shall match that currently in use in the Rivers Edge subdivision. 08-10-99 Development Review Board Minutes Page 6 OV13-99-52 T. J. BEDNAR HOMES MODEL 1900/2202, FAIRWAY VILLAGE & COPPER RIDGE ESTATES II Valerie Feuer introduced the staff report into the record. The Model 1900/2202 home can be described as having a Mission style. Architectural elements for this single-story home include a tiled roof, architecturally framed windows, corbels, and wainscotting. The model has a 3-car garage option, and features two elevations. Color palettes have been submitted for each subdivision for the model. The proposed color palette for Fairway Village includes Baja White and Fairway Village beige as exterior colors, with Porpoise, Teal, and Cocoa as trim colors. The proposed color palette for Copper Ridge Estates II is more extensive, and includes Caballeor Clay, Madera, Valley Floor, Fandango, and Hondo exterior colors and Prince Blue, Eucalyptus, and Sassy Miss trim colors. The color palette for Copper Ridge Estates II will bring a greater variety of colors and help to break up the "monochromatic" appearance of the Town. Staff recommends that the Porpoise, Teal and Cocoa trim colors not be used for Fairway Village, as the HOA has approved the architecture for the model on the condition that the exterior colors and trim be consistent with those currently in the neighborhood. Ted Bednar, T. J. Bednar Homes, commented he had no problems with staff conditions. He commented he would use the colors staff suggested. Mr. Bednar also provided color samples for the Board to review. Mr. Bednar addressed the spark arrestors, he commented he had a different cap and wanted to make sure the DRB approved. The Board did not have a problem with the cap as long as it met code. Valerie Feuer suggested changing the first condition to read trim colors shall be consistent. MOTION: Moved, seconded (Enger/Vogelsberg) and carried by a 5-0 vote to recommend approval of OV13-99-52 T.J. Bednar Homes Model 1900/2202, Fairway Village & Copper Ridge Estates II, subject to staff conditions and stipulating item one add trim colors shall be consistent. Staff Conditions: 1. The porpoise, Teal, and Cocoa trim colors shall not-be-utilized utilize ' be consistent for Fairway Village. 2. Windows shall either be recessed or popped out, except where under a porch. 3. Spark arrestors shall be camouflaged with a cap. 4. Ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be enclosed by a wall to provide visual screening and noise mitigation, and shall respect all setbacks. OV12-99-08 ORO VALLEY RETAIL CENTER BLOCK 8 DEVELOPMENT PLAN 08-10-99 Development Review Board Minutes Page 7 Valerie Feuer introduced the staff report into the record. The subject property is 1.25 acres with a 8,550 square foot building envelope. Located in Block 8 of the Oro Valley Retail Center; abuted on the north by Wells Fargo Bank, to the southwest by Carl's Jr., and to the east by Oracle Road. The development will have vehicular access off of the main parking area of the Oro Valley Retail Center. The building provides 57 parking spaces, including 2 handicapped accessible spaces. Craig Civalier introduced the engineer's report into the staff record. Access will be provided by an existing 24 ft wide PAAL that was constructed by the Target development to the interior road. There are no off site flows that impact this pad. Runoff flows from this site will be conveyed through the Carl's Jr.'s site, then through the Brake Max site to the historical discharge point. This site was mass graded during the construction of the Target Site. Minor amounts of cuts and fills will be necessary to adjust the site to finish grade. Charles Hulsey, WLB Group, was present for questions. Member Glueck questioned the traffic usage. Mr. Hulsey commented that the traffic use is calculated by the square footage and the retail use,which comes under one classification. MOTION: Moved, seconded (Vogelsberg/Enger) and carried by a 5-0 vote to recommend approval of OV12-99-08 Oro Valley Retail Center Block 8 Development Plan Planning Staff Conditions: 1. The development plan shall have one additional handicapped accessible space because the plan has more than fifty spaces. 2. The proposed bicycle racks shall be moved to comply with ADA standards. 3. Specialty pavement illustrating the internal pedestrian circulation shall be shown on the development plan and must be at least four feet wide. 4. A section of the sidewalk located at the northeast corner must be located within the property lines of the subject parcel. 5. The following statement shall be added to general note 43: "The public art for this project shall be approved prior to the approval of the building permit." 6. A twelve foot landscaped island should be added to block access from Car's Jr. 7. At least two ties to the boundary lines of this block to section or quarter section corners must be shown on the development plan. 8. These conditions shall be addressed prior to submittal of the development plan for Town Council. 08-10-99 Development Review Board Minutes Page 8 OV12-99-9 RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 10 PARCELS O&P PRELIMINARY PLAT Valerie Feuer introduced the staff report into the record. The proposed Preliminary Plat presented by the applicant calls for 103 residential lots to be constructed on approximately 19 acres, with 7 acres of a riparian wash area being preserved as natural open space. A buffer yard A is required along Desert Fairways Drive and Hidden Springs Drive, and while the applicant has stated that they will provide the buffer yards, the buffer yards are not indicated on the plat. Staff finds that the Rancho Vistoso NB 10 Parcels 0 & P preliminary plat is not in conformance with the medium-density residential land use density designation of 2.1-5.0 dwelling units per acre; however, the proposed development is permitted by the existing zoning. Staff recommends approval, subject to conditions listed in Exhibit A. Valerie Fueuer commented she wanted to add on to condition one first bullet to the end of the sentence subject to Planning and Zoning Administator's interpretation. Craig Civalier introduced the engineer's report into the record. Traffic will gain access to Rancho Vistoso Blvd. Hidden springs Drive and to Moore Road via Desert Fairways Drive. The entire site will be graded except for the existing wash in Common area "A". Five-year threshold retention is required for the site due to its location in the Highlands Wash. These parcels will be mass graded with the exception of the wash I common area "A" Rancho Vistoso PAD grading standards applies to this site. No grading waiver is expected for this project. Charles Hulsey, WLB Group, was present for questions. Mr. Hulsey stated there is a disagreement of the buffer yards but has talked with staff and felt it could be resolved. Mr. Hulsey briefly discussed the plans on the overview. He briefly reviewed the areas that are being encroached on and commented that WLB is willing to work with staff on this issue. Chair Lewis commented on the different buffer yards. She asked would the area behind the fences be landscaped. Mr. Hulsey replied yes. Member Vogelsberg asked would a cross access be required behind the development. Valerie Feuer replied yes. MOTION: Moved, seconded (Mager/Enger) and carried by a 4-0 vote (Glueck abstained) to recommend approval of OV12-99-9 Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 10 Parcels 0 & P Preliminary Plat Planning Staff Conditions: 1. The following items shall be resolved to the satisfaction of the Planning & Zoning Administrator prior to scheduling this item for Town Council review: • The design of the plat shall be modified to show the area for Buffer Yard "A" along Hidden Springs Drive and Desert Fairways Drive as Common Area A. The buffer yard shall not be part of the right-of-way or individual lot, subject to the Planning and Zoning Administrator's interpretation. 08-10-99 Development Review Board Minutes Page 9 • The design of the plat and the general notes shall be modified to reflect the permitted Medium Density Residential development standards under the Rancho Vistoso PAD. This includes, but is not limited to a minimum lot size of 5000 square feet, and a rear setback of 10'. • An area equal to that of the intrusion into the designated PAD open space shall be set aside on-site as designated open space. The applicant shall provide Staff with documentation indicating the total area of intrusion, and the total area of new designated open space on-site. • The applicant shall include the 15' apron area within the riparian habitat conservation easement, as required by the OVZCR. • The applicant shall submit a riparian habitat study and mitigation plan to Staff for review, or shall modify the plat design to exclude the designated riparian habitat areas and the required 15' apron area. 2. The PAD pedestrian trail in the wash shall be developed by the developer as a `primitive' trail,field located through the wash to minimize disturbance of the existing vegetation, and shall utilize trail markers throughout of a similar design to those used at Catalina State Park. The Planning & Zoning Administrator shall review and approve the field location and level of improvements for this trail. 3. An open access way shall be preserved between the cul-de-sacs at the ends of Streets "B" & "H" and the adjoining arterial streets to promote pedestrian and bicycle access to the development. Bollards and / or posts shall be utilized to prohibit access by motorized vehicles. 4. Extraneous information on the plat shall be eliminated. Engineering Conditions 5. Provide a copy of the soils report for this project. 6. The cul-de-sac on Streets "E" and "H" is over 600 feet long. Fire Marshal and Town Engineer approval is required. 7. Show site visibility triangles at all road intersections. 8. Show arrow label for the tie dimension to the '/4 corner of sections 25/26. 9. Provide soils report and the design criteria for the 2:1 slopes for the rear yards. 10. Include the 100-year flood elevations on the finish floor elevation table on sheet 6 of 6. 11. Label concentration point 6E on the plat. 08-10-99 Development Review Board Minutes Page 10 12. Show the scour holes at the outlets for all concentration points where the drainage report has identified the need. 13. Show and dimension bank protection in the common area in conformance with the revised drainage report. 14. Provide closure calculations of the boundary description to assure that the linear boundary closes in 1/10000 of precision. 15. Label parcels 0 and P on the cover sheet of the plat. 16. Provide a traffic impact report for this project that analyzes trip generation rates, trip distribution, capacity analysis and level of services evaluations. OV12-99-10 RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 10 PARCEL N MODEL HOMES DEVELOPMENT PLAN Valerie Feuer introduced the staff report into the record. The subject parcel is 4.56 acres and is zoned for Medium Density Residential under the Rancho Vistoso PAD. Three common areas are designed in this development plan; one buffering Rancho Vistoso Boulevard from the subject parcel, one used for parking spaces, and one serving as another buffer and pedestrian path along Hidden Springs Drive. Staff has evaluated the development against the General Plan policies and finds that it complies with policy 4.2A, encourage the provision of a variety of housing choices matched to employees within a reasonable proximity of employment sites. Engineer's report: The development will access Hidden Springs Drive with a proposed public street approximately 700 feet south of Vistoso Highlands Drive. Because of the small size of the project, the engineer has proposed storing the post-development runoff in the Moore Road Detention Facility. It will be mass graded. The extent cannot be determined from the information provided. It is requested grading plans be submitted during the improvement plan review. Planning staff recommends approval of the Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 10 Parcel N Model Homes Development Plan, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit "A". Charles Hulsey, WLB Group, representing Stone Crest Homes, was available for questions. He also commented that there were no problems with the conditions except the buffer yard which he felt could be worked out with Staff. Member Mager questioned condition 13. She wanted to know if the detention facility would be used by other developers, also who owns the facility or who is responsible for it. Mr. Civalier explained that eventually the detention facility would be filled up and over used. He would like to have a summary table of what is going into it and how much is left, so he will know when all the credits have been used up. Mr. Hulsey also commented that the Town makes the determination of the governing of it or who is responsible. 08-10-99 Development Review Board Minutes Page 11 He stated that maintenance of the facility is the responsibility of the Home Owners Association. Mr. Hulsey briefly showed the Board members on the overview where the facility was. Member Mager asked Mr. Hulsey if he had a problem with adding additional language to condition 2 subject to Planning and Zoning approval. Mr. Hulsey replied he did not have a problem with that additional language. MOTION: Moved, seconded (Vogelsberg/Glueck) and carried by a 5-0 vote to recommend approval of OV12-99-10 Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 10 Parcel N Model Homes Development Plan. Planning Staff Conditions: 1. The setbacks for the model homes must comply with the MDR development standards. The setbacks are: Front: 20 feet; Side: 5 feet or 0 feet for common wall on zero lot line development; Rear: 10 feet 2. The required buffer yards shall be specified on the development plan. Streetscape Buffer Yard C along Hidden Springs Drive and Buffer Yard D for the common area along Rancho Vistoso Boulevard subject to Planning and Zoning approval. 3. The word "Public" is hidden under the name label for Stonecrest Place on the plans. 4. Provide a pavement design and soils report. 5. Provide precision of closure calculations for all linear boundary legal descriptions. The error of closure must be less than 1/10,000. 6. The boundary calculations for the proposed Stonecrest Place due not match the information shown on the plans. The information on the plans is incomplete. 7. Show sight distance triangles for Stonecrest Place on the plans. 8. The fire note appears twice on the general notes, please remove one of them. 9. A 10-ft access easement is required on one side of the drainage way between lot 1 and Common Area"A". 10. Show two ties to section or quarter corners. 11. Label the ROW width of Rancho Vistoso Blvd. 12. The fire marshal and OV Water District must approve the water main system. 13. Provide a summary of the capacity of the Moore Road Detention Facility which 08-10-99 Development Review Board Minutes Page 12 shows, in tabular form,what runoff is presently being conveyed to this site,what projects in design are proposed to contribute flows and the amount of remaining reserve capacity. 14. Provide a short form traffic impact analysis showing trip generation, distribution and capacity analysis at the Hidden Springs Drive and Stonecrest Place intersection. OV12-98-1A RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 11 STONE CANYON GOLF COURSE TEMPORARY CLUBHOUSE AND RECREATION CENTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN Valerie Feuer introduced the staff report into the record. Stone Canyon will be a private golf course within a gated community. A temporary golf course clubhouse with associated parking has been combined with the recreation area required by OVZCR for all subdivisions. The golf course membership will be available to a limited number of Stone Canyon residents, while the recreation area will be open to all Stone Canyon residents. The purpose of the golf course overlay is to permit the development of golf courses while preserving and enhancing water resources, scenic vistas, neighborhoods, property uses and values. The overlay zone identifies a number of standards for gold course design and irrigation that must be met in order to obtain the approval of a development plan for a golf course. Craig Civalier introduced the engineer's report into the record. A 2 lane private road will provide access to this site that is an extension of Hohokam Village Place. The proposed area street network will have sufficient capacity to provide for an acceptable level of service. The Rancho Vistoso PAD grading ordinance applies to this project. No information was given on the development plan regarding exiting and proposed elevations. Therefore, grading limits could not be determined sufficiently to comment on. Planning staff finds that the Stone Canyon Golf Course Temporary Clubhouse and Recreation Area is in compliance with the General Plan policy 3.1F,maintain and enhance Oro Valley's residential/resort/recreation character. Mr. Charles Hulsey, WLB Group, was present representing Vistoso Partners. Mr. Hulsey provided and overview to show the DRB members where the clubhouse is located. He explained that there are approximately 850 homes that will be a part of Stone Canyon. Only 400 hundred of the homeowners will be allowed to join the Golf Course. Everyone will be a part of the recreation center. The problem is that the parking at the Club House is for members only. We are trying to work with staff on the parking spaces. WLB has no objections with staff conditions. Member Mager asked how temporary is the clubhouse. Mr. Hulsey replied approximately two to three years. MOTION: Moved, seconded (Enger/Mager) and carried by a 5-0 vote (Underwood/Bell absent)to recommend approval of OV12-98-IA Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 11 Stone Canyon Golf Course Temporary Clubhouse and Recreation Center Development Plan, subject to staff conditions. 08-10-99 Development Review Board Minutes Page 13 Planning Staff Conditions: 1. There shall be no encroachment into the dedicated natural open space, with the exception of the areas identified on the development plan. A trample zone, not to exceed 5 feet in depth, may be permitted. 2. Any significant changes to the approved development plan must be submitted and reviewed by planning staff. 3. A rationale for the reduced number of parking spaces based on different times of use must be provided for the Planning and Zoning Administrator's approval. 4. Minor revisions should be made to reduce the encroachment into the no-build areas, and must be approved by the Planning and Zoning Administrator. 5. The size of the recreation area and the total number of dwelling units to be served should be added to the general notes. STAFF REPORT: Valerie reminded the DRB members that a meeting has been set for August 31, 1999 a study session on Site Planning, Design Guidelines, and Community Design Concepts. She wanted the Board to know that the school district has decided to stick with the tile roof as the cost analysis proved not be any cheaper. She also informed the DRB that the Payless Shoe Source sign was turned down by Council. There will also be a site tour in September to take a look at the Foothills Business Park and a subdivision at Oro Valley Country Club. MOTION: Moved, seconded (Vogelsberg/Mager) and carried by. a 5-0 vote (Underwood/Bell absent) to adjourn the August 10t", 1999 Development Review Board Meeting at 8:30 P.M. Shirley Gay DRB Clerk • CONSENT ITEM t) ORO VALLEY PLANNING&ZONING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD REPORT MEETING DATE:August 10, 1999 TO: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD FROM: Dennis Silva,Jr.,Planner I SUBJECT: OV13-99-46 MODEL 2880, RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 11 PARCELS H&N,LOT 51 BACKGROUND: On July 17th, 1996,the Mayor and Council approved the final plat for Rancho Vistoso,Neighborhood 11, Parcels H and N, an 89 lot single family project on approximately 84 acres in size. The subject property, which abuts golf course fairways on its north and east property boundaries,is located north of Vistoso Highlands Drive(the entry drive to the golf course) and west of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard. The typical lot size for this subdivision is 15,000 square feet. Building heights are limited to 30 feet and setbacks are front-20 feet,side- 5 feet and rear- 10 feet. SUMMARY: Model 2880 is proposed for lot 51, 588 West Quiet Springs Drive. The architectural style for this model is Southwest Contemporary. Architectural elements include a river sand stucco finish, recessed windows at all elevations, glass block windows along the left and rear elevations, tile accent: slate "patina" along the front and left elevations, and varied flat rooflines. A color palette has been submitted illustrating the house base color, Dunn-Edwards "Truffle" and the front wall tile accent,"Patina." GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE: The proposed model complies with Policy 9.1F ensuring that all sides of buildings are coherently designed and treated. Architectural elements found in this custom home bring more diversity of style to the neighborhood. RECOMMENDATION: Planning staff finds model 2880 consistent with previously approved models in this subdivision and recommends approval,subject to the conditions attached in Exhibit"A." Attachments: 1. Exhibit"A"—Conditions for Approval 2. Custom Home Elevations F:\OV\OV 13\1999\13-99-46\ARCHDRBRPT.doc I EXHIBIT"A" OV13-99-46 MODEL 2880,LOT 51 RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 11 PARCELS H&N 1. Ground-mounted mechanical equipment shall be enclosed by a wall to provide visual screening and noise mitigation. 2. Spark arrestors shall be camouflaged with a cap,as approved by Planning and Zoning Staff. 3. All flat-roofed segments of the home must have roof coatings painted to match the stucco. 2 MILILENNIUM MOAB J C Model 3200 Lot 52 Vistoso IDFSIt % Highlands p 1ai u■■i u u i 5 Oro Valley,Arizona (52C) 498-1 t C7 '�� LJB Construction (AO''q� Tucson, Arizona (520)290-0309 SAMPLE MATERIALS rru°flea 4I HOUSE D 1SE COLOR PONg. MAI Altin TAU sal 47 (LRhul = 50) b � k FRONT WALLS TILE ACCENT lab, X 12"St..es-1e •• Ft6,71NA“ • 51 : NE1GHE3OHOOI7 11 (VISTOSO HIGHLANDS) 5&& W. QUIET SPRIINGS DRIVE ORO- VALLEY, AZ. * --- FR -—• `, 1. LOVED DISTURBED AREAS RESULTING OM OPERATIONS ON /� 'I, OT'SHA1t BE RESTORED TO THEIR NATURAL STATE BY \ '�' ( IN\'' UTILIZINGDROUGHT RESISTANTVEGETATIONASSTATEDBYTHE\.,, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE. ALL UTIUTY TRENCHES ANDIOR Q LEACH FIELDS ARE TO BE RESTORED TO THEIR ORIGINAL NATURAL -- CONDITIONS. . . 2 EXCESS SOIL GENERATED FROM EARTHWORK OPERATIONS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND LAWFULLY DISPOSED OF OR, IF 4'GMU/STUCCO ALLOWED AND APPROVED BY THE TOWN ENGINEER,SiTF MATERIAL PATIO WALL �' i fi!!AY 8E PLACED SO AS TO BECOME AN INTEGRAL PkAT OF THE SITE + g,4 1* r,' a'e - DEVELOPMENT, ALL IN ACCORDANCE •WITH THE' HILLSIDE lam. DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. 10'RADIUS SETBACK / \ 10'RADIUS SETBACK `pis { ADJ.TO GOLF h 10'R TO GOLF 3. • CUT AND FILL SLOPES AND SLOPE TREATIAENt:TD'BE.IN COMPLIANCE COURSE l COURSE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE :ACCEPTED .GEOTECHNICAI ENGINEERING INVESTIGATION OR THE:TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 1 REVEGETATiON REQUIREMENTS. (Sy - - 4. EXCESS .SOIL MATERIAL GENERATED- FROM THE EARTHWORK= 25'REARl'ARD 1 ' '"��''�BLDG.SETBACK OPERATIONS SHALL NOT BE DISPOSED OF BY PUSHING OR PLACING 1 �3 -�,[ SAID MATERIAL INTO THE AREAS DESIGNATED-AS 100 YEAR . FLOODPLAIN AREAS. - _ 5. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ASSURING PROPER AND j _ ADEQUATE DRAINAGE. • ' _ _ - 6. ELEVATION OF FINISH PAD SHALL BE CERTIFIED BY A REGISTERED ••���•• .m*� s �= -I LAND SURVEYOR PRIOR TO POURING FOUNDATIONS. A COPY OF THE ` Fiji �": J - -Q CERTIFICATION MUST BE APPROVED BY THE ORO VALLEY BUILDING g an 8 T_,..._.•-• D `� SAFETY DEPARTMENT PRIOR 70 CALLING FOR BUILDING INSPECTIONS P-po• [_ µ*" i \� , _ . � ��I -' 7. PRIOR TO ANY BUILDING FINALS,A FINAL GRADING INSPECTION MUST fi �� I BE OBTAINED FROM THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY. CALL THE ORO :4-- 1� 1 `° ••t 4, •.. VALLEY BUILDING SAFETY DEPARTMENT AT..797.9797 FOR A FINAL (ti - ;, ��; \,\. 41 " GRADING INSPECTION AT'LEAST 24 (tWENTY-FOUR) HOURS IN [ I �� �--4'CMU/STUCCO __ .12' FM) ..„. \ ADVANCE PATIO WALL 01 i -raft, m4F) ' 0, f HYAC EQUIPM ENT 41) l4 e 140 4 _ . SERVICE YARD ""'t i 1 e�i� 1 4'SETBACK FOR 4' 1t. \S1 \�� •'" 4'SETBACK FOR PATIO WALL • _ _ _ ('� t 4,e PATIO WALL ® 1 » 1 HYAC EQUIPMENT SQUARE L.(). �1 i .rt. ,,, a 66. SERVICE YARD FOOTAGE: 8' ,� _cLRH._ J I 1 PIM 4'CMU/STUCCO LIVING AREA: 2.949 S.F. SIDEYAD BLDG. / �\ 4 PATIO WALL e SETBACK • ` 1 -I g'SIDE YARD BLpG. GARAGE: 882 S.F. Ifir . ` O...� v* 8' SETBACK PORCHES: 595 S.F. 0 588 wEsT auI sr� �: Q�. 11' TOTAL UNDER ROOF: 4.426 5.F. No,>ria xrM ...A. liVUONtilUlli,_•� 2880 i it 13' �` -*it1 r `ir--- PARCE.['� tt�. ��: 1 -' • 1 ( [ Oro YaM�r, owo • 1 1 ' ' f • •f 1 i 1 i M I 1 . illis‘aratik. er � -- - I j i PARCEL s j << L18 Con�i*►vcfi'o,+ .. .....f..f., ....1..1 ' 1, Tucson, sOrW `• •. 1iii01„-4,j, o a�, "�.. a'1� t520)290=0309. 1‘.. ,Ir-t?ryi 1 • • ' 70151461-p73,FaiteEtee\Arr'A.-___,, \II--# , '''''-•27-1-----.1_:__124,,_/19 f_ jp rip c. I�BLDG.SETBACK 25'FRONT YARD CONCRETE DRIVE N y iikog T . ..� �r iI ID 1 .. j,j • �� lY ( 2o) 49s-1007 Icr�.aa t_______4\, 0 1. U4/' SHEET TYPE 5'SIDEWALK s 4`t c�a cam"E. • • I �� •1 • * ( PROJECT # 1 3'LANDSCAPING, - _ �° QUIET SPRINGS PRIVE • ------ ---tea° DATE_ y . , 1 4: _ LOCA11ONMAP • "y i A¢PORTION OF TIE S.E.1/4 OF SECTION 23,&S/W 1/4 OF SEC 24 1 T-11-S,R-13-E,G.&S.RM TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY.ARIZONA i • 19'-6 FINISH MATS IALS • ' ) • 1 18'-O„ �asaa4 14'-0" t 1 - RIVER SAND STUCCO FINISH OVER • •._ `' � i6'rO" •>,.;. 2X6 FRAME CON STRUCTION. NSTRUCTION. • 13'-0" -• �._ - ,•• • • 1"'•6�� �Z BASE COLOR:DUNN-EDWARDS `, 4 l ? .•.• .... _• •, "�''.' • •• • s • •• SP147"TRUFFLE"(LRY:30) • • =',, • , _3 T WINDOWS:SAID COLOR FLAMES . ,. .: • • �_"� I . . '% `:J (454 TILE ACCENT:SLATE l'ATlNA" © I i ! t '. w I5 FLAT ROOF FINISH COLOR TO • ' \ �'� � � 'jam � .. - � � • j- 7�' • [ �r i ���� o- - .-- j" ; . • MATCH HOUSE COLOR • 6 PATIO!SCREEN WALLS:8"CMU t �--- -•—�---7.-. .-r--r- nr-f----F-F . • •. : STUCCO.COLOR TO MATCH HOUSE -• . F •- 7 GLASS l3l.00K FRONT` L V TION • 0 •• I. • 16'-0" 16'�Ot� v _ < .u, 13'-0 _� ._. ... .x . ` l Jt i o 0 . = i �+ \, . • ..l .......... ................... .i: ' • AILiENltlJA O` - -- r---- i Model.l880- ` •• lot 51 Vktosox • LEFT SIDE ELEVATION ..0 . - ITT. SIDE ELEVATION Highlands QOro VaUey Artsona LIB Construction - Tucson, Arizona i • (520)290-0309 ilI ll . 161„07C 13'-6" ti� ���._—--- H 13'-O" D�S I7 N . I - (52t) 4)8-14)07 - SHEET TYPE .._.._.�— .-..� I, .. . �. • o 0 --- '--; 2. PROJECT # _ . (:). Q DATE h• �I. . ..............____. ®� • IZEA Z ELEVATION '