Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOV139914 TRANSMITTAL SAKELLAR ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS AND PLANNERS, INC. 7251 N. WESTWARD LOOK DRIVE TUCSON, AZ 85704 VOICE 520-297-7117 FAX 520-297-2319 To: VAI...R►IE FUE k Date: oz/0bl Ti OR'' Vp,,L,I. Y }BALL Job No.: 214P Project: OR© VALLE' rfxLJ�l t+ALL, ADD M014 From: MA i4UE.L gO O Action required Via: 01144130 'DMA %L�»K.'2 ❑ For your information Copies Originals # Sheets #Pages Description It 1 K. Pie oRe' VAU.eNi 'Mt-0g 4 ALL. A1717 L" Please Note: 1'I-E#4 E �toTE "T't P T "T I- E S O.OO Y E }4As 8t E1 i W A1y E n "TOE.. [. 1 r.5 Copies of above material to: Please notify us if material transmitted does not correspond with description above. Redd by: Date: E\550des\13\transmit.doc TOWN OF ORO VALLEY APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROJECT ARCHITECTURE DATE : OV CASE NO. : ( -27 (office use only) PROJECT: ORO VALLEY TOWN HALL ADDITION LOCATION: 11,000 NORTH LA CANADA DRIVE APPLICANT: 'TOWN OF ORO VALLEY ADDRESS : 11,000 NORTH LA CANADA DRIVE TELEPHONE NO. : 797-9797 PROPERTY OWNER: ORO VALLEY ADDRESS : 11,000 NORTH LA CANADA DRIVE PHONE NO. : 797-9797 PROJECT ARCTHITECT/ENGINEER: SAKELLAR ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS ADDRESS : 7251 NORTH WESTWARD LOOK DRIVE DEVELOPMENT REV gsA HEARING DATE : SIGNATURE : 7 DATE : OSiMI aet NOTE: This application must be accompanied by the required $150 . 00 fee and twelve copies of the plans, 11" x 17" in size, each to include dimensioned elevations of all structures from all four sides and a cccv of the proj ect ' s site plan. The submittal must also include a pro_cse d color palette for the project in an 8 . 5 " x 11" format, to include color chips of body and trim colors and tile color and style, if applicable . Building square footage is also required. AT THE MEETING, applicants must have on hand for presentation, colored perspective or rendered elevations of all four sides of the structures . SLUBMITTALS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AT LEAST 18 CALENDAR DAYS IN ADVANCE OF THE DESIRED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD HEARING DATE. 0 oi-OR. 5"VIP L-E 5 70“31.4 ttALA, ft01)i 11014- Ofe-0 VALE q 431 JI 1 437 IJ ICI ICI MR,",' 00YY 56/173 MP7 Antique 00YY 65/189 Bisque Venus Star 0 -VO RETAIN THIS PORTION OF CHIP RETAIN THIS PORTION OF CHIP 39 • ICI 10 laalVI SCA tt 043. a ,_ sl leen cn 0 1 - LI . .. . . I 400 II . , ICI ICI MP# MP 90Y OBG 32,238 ,1 •,` , R 77/100 ki Hidden 7 ' Courtship Harbor cl 63 . , .: ,eci.151 0., RETAIN bit THIS RETAIN ir. PORTION . THIS PORTION OF CHIP OF CHIP 1 r.1 to iTh7i-4: ci oar . uutet a ow .1_,..... -TVIevf$. 0415• W-citt it -fascia loosvd. 1.....,', ,„.., L____. MINUTES OF THE ORO VALLEY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING Tuesday March 9th, 1999 CALL TO ORDER: 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL: Present Patti Jo Lewis, Chair Mary Glueck,Vice Chair Richard Underwood, Member Nancy Mager, Member Jim Vogelsberg, Member Verlin Smith, Member Others Present: Valerie Feuer, Senior Planner Paul Nzomo, Engineer Shirley Gay, Clerk MOTION: Moved, seconded (Mager/Smith) and carried by a 5-0 vote (Underwood absent)to approve the February 9th, 1999 Development Review Board Meeting as written. Richard Underwood joined meeting. CONSENT AGENDA A. OV13-99-18 GOLF CART GARAGE ADDITON, 14645 N. DEL WEBB VLVD. B. OV13-99-19 FRONT ROOM ADDITION, 14508 N. LOST ARROW C. OV13-99-21 CUSTOM HOME, RANCHO VISTOSO 11 H & N, FOURTH GREEN AT VISTOSO,LOT 24 D. OV13-99-23 FRONT AROOM ADDITION, 1794 E LONE RIDER WAY E. OV13-97-68 RANCHO VISTOSO 10M, MARVILLA, DAVID BAIRD, MODEL REVISION F. OV13-97-68 RANCHO VISTOSO 10M, MARAVILLA, DAVID BAIRD, MAILBOX SHELTER G. OV13-97-68 RANCHO VISTOSO 10M, MARAVILLA, DAVID BAIRD, ENTRY MONUMENT AND LANDSCAPE H. OV13-99-20 RANCHO VISTOSO 11 AJ, VISTOSO GOLF CASITAS II ARCHITECTURE I. OV12-98-21 RANCHO VISTOSO 11 AJ, VISTOSO GOLF CASITAS II 03-09-99 Development Review Board Minutes Page 2 LANDSCAPE PLAN Valerie Feuer informed the Board on item H, there was a change on the color of the tile at the request of Vistoso Partners, this tile matched more closely the tile at the Vistoso Casitas. MOTION: Moved, seconded (Smith/Vogelsberg) and carried by a 6-0 vote to recommend approval of Consent Agenda Items A thru I subject to staff conditions. REGULAR AGENDA OV13-99-22 THE BOULDERS AT LA RESERVE REQUEST TO REMOVE CHIMNEY CAPS Valerie Feuer introduced the staff report into the record. She explained that Greystar Multi- family Services is requesting the chimney cap be eliminated because they have become a serious liability to the ownership of the property. Approximately six of the chimney caps that are installed over the spark arrestors have been torn loose by high winds. The situation can pose extreme liability to the applicant and potential danger to residents. The applicant has explored replacing the caps with a heavier gauge steel or different design. Due to the replacement cost, the applicant is requesting that the DRB allow the chimney caps to be removed entirely, exposing the spark arrestor. The chimney cap has been required by DRB for aesthetics and is not a building code requirement. Staff recommends that DRB remove the condition for the chimney caps for this project only. Member Smith commented that the condition states that an Oro Valley approved chimney cap be used. Who approved it? Valerie Feuer explained that it is a standard design that was approved by Oro Valley at one time, it is for aesthetic purpose to hide the spark arrestor. David Vanek, Construction Manager, Greystar Services explained to the Board because of the location of the Boulders, there is a lot of wind, these events are unpredictable and he feels this is an extreme liability and dangerous situation, changes need to be made. Member Underwood suggested that on one of the buildings take off the chimney caps paint the arrestor the same color of the building and the DRB go on site to see what the building would look like without the chimney cap. Valerie Feuer commented the Board needs to decide if it is important to have a chimney cap or decide to remove them for this one time purpose only. Member Glueck felt it was a tuff call because if this is approved would some one else want to do the same thing. Member Smith felt it also a liability to the Town and the Town needs to look into this with an engineer to see if a better, safer design would improve these situations. Member Glueck agreed it would be a good idea to go on to the site and see what it would like without the chimney cap. 03-09-99 Development Review Board Minutes Page 3 MOTION: Moved, seconded (Underwood/Smith) and carried by a 6-0 vote to continue this item to the April 13th DRB meeting pending a site tour and look at proposed recommendation from the Town and Engineer staff to provide a safer chimney cap. OV12-99-4 CASAS ADOBES BAPTIST CHURCH AMENDED DEVELOPMENT PLAN Valerie Feuer introduced the staff report into the record. Cella Barr Associates, representing the Casas Adobes Baptist Church request DRB recommendation for a revised development plan, which was previously approved by Pima County. The Church is located within the newly annexed area and is west of the Canada Hills PAD, approximately 1/2 mile east of Shannon Road. The Church is 85 acres in size with twenty-five structures scattered throughout the site. This site will consist of a church, daycare, and parochial school. One of the original classrooms was deleted. Six modulars were also added. A Central Plant addition and storage units were also added to this plan. The existing development was approved under Pima County standards and since the amendments are less than 25% of the site, Oro Valley standards do not apply to the existing buildings. The grading and paving for this site is completed and School, Daycare, and Worship buildings are completed with the exception of the Chapel and Fellowship Hall which will be added. The Workshop and Gymnasium are existing structures, which were approved under Pima County standards. A multi-purpose athletic field and basketball courts are located along the southeastern corner of the site. The access to this site is off Lambert Lane and La Cholla Boulevard. Valerie Feuer had an added condition addressing the time frame that the modulars would be set-up. Staff recommends a five year time frame and after that time an option tocome back to Staff for approval of the extension of time allowed for the modulars to be up. Paul Nzomo introduced the Engineer's report into the record. The development of Casas Adobes Church is not anticipated to significantly impact La Cholla Boulevard and Lambert Lane intersection during weekdays operations. However, on Sundays, site generated traffic has the potential to significantly impact traffic operations on La Cholla Boulevard and particularly at the intersection of La Cholla Boulevard and key intersections from Ina Road north to Lambert Lane during the Sunday entering and exiting peak hours. It is recommended to have at a minimum, uniformed officer traffic control on Sundays prior to and extending throughout the peak hours of the church. It is also recommended that a traffic management plan be developed in concert with the Town and church officials that could promote car-pooling and ride sharing amongst the congregation in order to reduce the total number of trips. This site has already been graded and paved. Staff recommends approval for the Casas Adobes Baptist Church Amended Develop Plan. Member Glueck expressed her concern about the traffic, had there been a traffic study for future trips as the school grows. She felt a condition should be added for future Traffic Management. Warren Thompson, Cella Barr Associates, representing the applicant provided a visual of the 03-09-99 Development Review Board Minutes Page 4 existing area and explained what changes are being proposed. Member Underwood felt this was a good plan that seems to be working and should be approved. Pastor Barrier commented that the Church is willing to do whatever it takes to work with the Town and the traffic issues. MOTION: Moved, seconded (Underwood/Mager) and carried by a 6-0 vote to recommend approval of OV12-99-4 Casas Adobes Baptist Church Amended Development Plan subject to staff's conditions. PLANNING STAFF CONDITIONS: 1. The architecture for all permanent and temporary buildings must be approved by the Development Review Board (DRB). 2. General note 19 must be changed to the "Town of Oro Valley." 3. Delete "Engineer" in general note 23. 4. Time frame of modular(s) is five years and option to renew must be approved by Planning and Zoning Administration. 5. Traffic Management Plan with the Town Staff and the Church for long term traffic study. OV13-99-14 TOWN HALL ADDITION ARCHITECTURE, 11000 NORTH LA CANADA Sakellar Associates, representing the Town of Oro Valley, request DRB approval of the proposed architecture for the Town Hall Addition. The new addition will be located in the north of the existing Community Development and Court buildings, and when completed, will house the Public Works and Community Development Departments. At present, the site of the building consists of disturbed desert and sparse vegetation. The proposed building design is similar to the existing Administration, Court and Community Development building on site. The design may be described as Mission in architectural style, with stuccoed buildings, pitched Spanish tile roofs, popouts, recessed windows and arched, covered walkways to connect the buildings. The proposed design meets the Community Design Element policy 9.1F of the General Plan, which states that "all sides of buildings may impact their surroundings and should be coherently designed and treated." Staff finds that the proposed architecture for the Town Hall Addition is consistent with the existing buildings on site, and recommends approval. Member Underwood commented about the parking, would there be more parking spaces as they are certainly needed. Valerie Feuer replied that was a concern and it is being dealt with for this new building. Deno Sakellar, Sakellar Associates, representing the Town, provided a colored visual for the proposed project. He explained the building design is similar in style to the existing buildings on site. There will be more parking spaces and the landscape will be addressed. 03-09-99 Development Review Board Minutes Page 5 MOTION: Moved, seconded (Mager/Vogelsberg) and carried by a 6-0 vote to recommend approval of OV13-99-14 Town Hall Addition Architecture, 11000 North La Canada Drive STAFF REPORT Valerie Feuer informed the Board there would be a special meeting on March 16th, 1999 at 6:00 p.m. in the Court Building. The topic will be Inn at Vistoso development plan and landscape plan. There will be a site tour April 8th at 5:30 to look at the Chimney Caps at the Boulders. MOTION: Moved, seconded (Underwood/Vogesberg) and carried by a 6-0 vote to adjourn the March 9th, 1999 Development Review Board Meeting at 7:40 p.m. Shirley Gay DRB Clerk ITEM 3 1 ORO VALLEY PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING DATE: March G,h 1999 TO: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD FROM: David Marsh, Planner I SUBJECT: OV13-99-14 Town Hall Addition Architecture, 11000 North La Canada Drive BACKGROUND: Sakellar Associates, representing the Town of Oro Valley, request DRB approval of the proposed architecture for the Town Hall Addition. The new addition will be located to the north of the existing Community Development and Court buildings, and when completed, will house the Public Works and Community Development Departments. At present,the site of the building consists of disturbed desert and sparse vegetation. SUMMARY: The proposed building design is similar in style to the existing Administration,Court, and Community Development buildings on site. This design may be described as Mission in architectural style, with stuccoed buildings, pitched Spanish tile roofs, popouts, recessed windows, and arched, covered walkways to connect the buildings. The color palette for the new structure will be identical to the existing buildings on site, and the architect has also stated that a skylight will be added to the proposed design to provide natural lighting to the interior office areas. The single story. 25'3" tall building will contain office space for the Public Works and Community Development Staff, conference rooms,a public hearing room, lunch room,and record storage facilities. GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE: The proposed design meets the Community Design Element policy 9.1F of the General Plan, which states that "all sides of buildings may impact their surroundings and should be coherently designed and treated". All elevations have been designed with architectural details that meet this policy. RECOMMENDATION: Staff finds that the proposed architecture for the Town Hall Addition is consistent with the existing buildings on site, and recommend approval. Attachments: 1. Draft development plan 2. Building elevations—composite 3. Floor plan F:\ov\ov13\1999\13-99-14\ARCHRPT.D RB.doc 1 : PARKING RESUME -- —__ -- — -- -- — — — — — -.e. �..-�S ]Uf LA GANAPA DRIVE t ' • • ..... =„ , - � TOWN HALL USE 5 F PF. TOTAL `—� - _ >fx ADD TION BUILDING A ..' �` t`r t ADMIN. II p00 S F. /400 2?.50 yr. �'' ;-- lams.,,P.o�. I y _ - a �'.. BUILDING J 4�12 S.F. /400 1053 - `�„ ,._. • COURTS "..r "ws ¢ ;rt, v: t t? :g t BUILDING C 2112 S.F. t p1400 1.28 r.- ` t r t �;f; I .�;•,, ,,; 4 COMMUNITY t:�'. 1 ! �.,--". +'FUi1JRE 30,O. _ m .. E)POLICE STATION r WIDE DRIVEWAY `�` { BUILDING P 12,530 S.F. /400 �[ •� z J -_ 1 „ 6 IlOoO NORTH LA ANADA �li.3� w 1 -•,r I e ! i ! F!E=-1C.1' 1 ... - s. �` 1 - 1UGSON,AZ R 85737 s- POLICE f 12 NEW BUILDING-N �/ r - I =1; .. �r i� i 10,000 5,F. /400 25 '-` - lfr---- 1 ¢ - I ,� A\ '.'1.---...j - }, V I i t '-� I ,F""``"... Y' rf-'y'. - i s r r �. I ` T f 1 1 f a� 5UI3TOTAL. 30,654 S.F. 102 ;P � I�ir¢ =r NARANJA - �� t �/ �� =' ` - \ f ( " j • ., n n 1 SPACE/2 EMPLOYEES= 180 2 Jr _ '- 11 11 f k / p 1 £7�' ,r S / 10 'Pp ;,tom /" k a �_`_� I I � 1 :Tqj `I»�1 ' r r" a~ THIS I SPACE/COMPANY VEHICLE=45 45 t i ; + -- T--ilThr t _ PROJECT fl ( t{{ TOTAL _ ; k':!. _! :. f f ',' ?. .,i-4- # ( I 1 1 40,654 S.F. 186 �:-, _._'t t >+: � >` i/.rfi .,..._., :. ..- +.- ..� ' -� 1 :b -.` h..lx"rr�T 7 r ( l/TVtf'ILL.Vll.i.JRJ! r ;'' - � a r. � _ty POINY APi3�Tt-1.,fr k ;�t=-'�'_ ItI. .:. y H-4+O+ftH4€J i ; ;. -_-.-,i � ), 8 j ff11 A; REQUIRED PARKING SPACES 231 r ,r ... ) I I t , $ ih.', f' r F- GOLF t PROVIDED PARKING SPACES 249 rFf % 4 ;.• ---` t.i s \ Y _ ; GouraSE l- l {I r7;;.,yw.___._ -'r;.f-j \� f•,'..\ irf �I j.` 7 , •.� \' x DISABLE REQUIRED 8 • t :, s ,> i✓r 2w ;w r'r '"t * ' y - DISABLE PROVIDED 9 , ,. ;;y - • t r ', 1, ? 1 ''4 -,:::?" ,.,. c ; SCALE "i Mlle BICYCLE SPACES REQUIRED Iq - x,: r ,. w;. f / 1 \ 3'1 :i 1 *�' � _ � � EscO05 Mllelt..'G ,:- ;h =:". '. � 1 ! r-BICYCLE SPACES PROVIDED ? 1t .�"' � ,,yv•'.: 'r 1 'ez:-.;:li„...::„.------i',.:,i.,,q.,,,i11,f:.,,. �{ LI . > 1. . a � � MA6�OUR i� FFE=O2 ' :Y ;t ° .w Sakellar Associates 4. Or ., 'i ,.,i ,� ,-.• 't t a _ `•, I +. ARGN I i[G13 AMP /LAMM[RS,INC. Y _ F_+ t � � NEW W1LD _. `i t I ,, - `' `-'K . --- r i i+'1 _ FF.E'+02.40 _ '~•:.�„•,•��, ,.�"-�',- "•,.'y `».,y,* '" f r ;f ` 1791!l Y'E91YlARD LCGK DR"TUGSCfI AZ 1 D5104 ADMIN. •::.'a„,:. yy , I W ..2 : l(...0t,.:/., _ ^' ''a _ \�+,•a, \♦- �'•^ ,r r�/,.a t`, - P C E:I'S7/J)]9'1=IR FAJ4 241-7319 �. , .� .,, .,. 1ST LEVEL:8 5F. •`.�_ {` k--' - - �- $~ �.,-�, \� `.. .- X,` ? \ '( - -i' _ --- g ,.r-" , \ `♦ -- ,i'.,,, f i `• EMAIL:SAKFJI'RaAOLf,OM = 65MT.:2, 0 SP2,4125F x �`i" l . I l I t f ? G },. a,"� :d -eft i-ra y".,. - w.}��y.� ., �.t \ .f; -�' ♦ l i 'i �',t.. , a i, � ,;.. t r;r i l_.-,,.- '! ' i ,.:,•'-•".'''�c! .7 x` F�--tf.. ..:.,;,:a?�}`:. Y�"' �'>��2.�. x._ 1 't _ _ +•� i .. _,,,r � 'd r �. 1 _� � :n .� `{ .: x ".s._','1 '�'rR' 'R. -' ,{/-, : >S4 3'• - _ e +Y .-..---_ ,/'�. �i E 1�..;\•.`1�4 -y..• e'I'- �N , � _ -s.�.-..' ..' .. �r.�.*w"... .. .1 ^f _ 'r� �: yam.✓f .{ �. - 1"' ,--° K:. tit" -,s 7"A"s .r.� ._r" "",_- :\ "��--==�"' -\i. X rr.. - `*--_-_,-.!— ,'- .� ,.sr: _ t` a - - eey� } --.-._..` 'ti w. .�r�r s��.i rr _ '! I—..'I e- '. �,.♦ `-,.\ ^.,� ""� ." '�+.'-` -/I •"-+...�•4•-' Tom^.,.- 9 yL ' 2:1' ..... , ?,. :.7• ..:r-• �. ...,.--.�•,\1• ..,`a f. ,;�- -. -yr�+'.`b^„+,.r.-r•""sr ..,y ate: f+-,;, r� /". / •-..at ,., _ r c : 7 ,r •,,,•.; __ _....-.._. - , :,.+�.:.. a r .'`t,-'^' 4, r 11', f SNMrr b ♦ y u /, ».,✓'.��.•� .: -.'�.,,.. � " t� .4, ,a... >�„ �, 'Cs /x , ,/f,.,,. ;,.,e�l�t q 'i >"^'• \,, '�.'... y F;f"i" "r'r `n«✓".,- _ ,5'-',' r'_i.,,:.•' /"`-' z1' `1.: ".� 1ey{" C xM1 3 `�.. \ s..-.._.. \_� ,`..- '1, ,, - _. �.,....� -� ti'ti�. :�.'k-' r•'",-.- \'• 't;1: E l -^. . 'r,+-,'r.�\ �= ,r �..':i:•�!/'%;�%•�� r,.r,,, .•,. -•- may_--,_,-•^•-ys�. -.►.r•,-�sr�r.Nir^ �.�i. r', '\ t \ \,,a -..♦• , .s,'f`,-_:r, -''..t= -.\•`-�•�„ -'"= - --_ - �oo�atoa Ruw p0 - _ i "� - • •'�i ••i r' ' ,, r.:..�.r-• } ..- �.�.-."-._�°'.�f ...:s`- � %' �L _._., xik -.fp41M'f>R1MN - "t ..r . '._'-^....._ ti � `?,:,�•. �; -•I i i s:i. %, � _, -.. _ --_.:�. .:. ..M �� �.,,.<. _ "eo \,t a'\ -lY},'=i , ... ._.-� •. ..-�: t2 � j s,_.._-- .__ ,. '. , [.,'� ._:-. }�''� `•- .r!';':5,...:ti _ - - "" _.,_.. -... ..,_ '�'t•'-� t -z: L a' •_ a• �_...._ .....,.\a,. �,' �. ,..� ' i ,l: ' /,�:a.;/',i:',.%I!r ^•__'�.__ (t . � �`y.� -! ,-�'k.,,y _ 5 r` 4-\ J� v.. '!; , 1.♦} t_ i r r f .{, r, `y.,--' '^�L_ yc.y..._.." .-.=••;s' ''s _- r::..,,4 ..' ''' t �\ r. t�£$ -_ --'_ _ i ..,...,, -` - -_,. 1 i 4 `�",: GOVL'M?AN7, , } ,>. ., t f±:F 1,�. f ,�,i ;,. ..i'f` r'" �-t,c ^^' ...•TM"•"",..-ana._.,q -.^•-'..-.. <+. ) ':,.'sS.;.` '�tr�,.,- •_ 1. ( r i,e 4 -_� i / s:"+...d. ." ".+rw.-.,'^'^`r ." -' '^e ..;^'�":: �.r� }' _ _' S 4-.i j'e I .y. .. 4L„"cr•'.. /� i_ ( 1 I t,t i .... .y,,,.� 1+.. f _ ry x i.may . i ~ '� t � , a r 1 ��._ ? ,.:/ '• '� '... "�.RR�-�,,,, '""+," -'L...,,,,-..r., •"'°r.. _ _ l%,.` _ ...t' a N/:.. � •,,/,};J3 . �, ram' _..:- �..._- - �r, .--...__._..`♦_.n t ..._.. .va�..4i` f"„w :y,, ,_/• r; }�� •s-, , : J �%E/rrr/ I - -_ l • / •,. 'r:,' f l) -,ice""_ -'' ."'r-'_, '' >, > i :•�. .)1 Ys i 'e'� ' { _ ��_ e `Z ti �� 1/4 t _fS SIN 11 I ,- .,_.'--«.:.-.-3 i. 9 n 1 s ;t 1 I " ti r /,r7 .� 1 ✓ '' jfr ts� xJ j s q1.,,!.`.t, 4 r r i z ,.� ¢ ! � ., ,. - ?�t r .... C r } i • s1 ,, Ir,1,. /7 t h 1-'' / i ✓ rr ,�+f ... 3 ,r t V�: / - - r DVLOPMENT PLAN E: n ';b . I/'// 7; ' .°'. 1 50' G N LEGEND NOTES s DESIGN DEVFLAF'MENT EXISTING NEW NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION BUILDING II I. ONSITE SANITARY SEWER HILL BE CONSTRUCTED,OPERATED AND MAINTAINED BY THE PAVING -� I I CITY OF ORO VALLEY,I.E.; IT WILL SE PRIVATE AND NOT IN THE CONTROL OF PIMA DATE: a/I9n9gq COUNTY WASTEWATER. Joe No. �6 WALL FENCE -- 2. THE SANITARY SEINER HILL BE DESIGNED TO PROVIDE GRAVITY FLOW. DRAM�: ,ICA,TA CURBC� SIDEWALK MEET 3. ANY WASTEWATERTHEREQUIREMENTS DISCHAROF PIMAGED INTOCOUNT THEY PUB ORLICDINAN SANITARYCENO.I1I SE82W-154ERA,GEAS SYSTEM NDED SHALLBY CHECKED er: GNS PIMA CO.ORDINANCE NO.14183-5(INDUSTRIAL HASTE). PROP.LINE .----...--.--..-- DEVELOPMENTli 4.THE BASIS OF ELEVATIONS IS A 5/8" IRON PIN WHICH IS AD.O.T.BENCHMARK NO. 105 TREE FROM THE LA CANNON ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION. SAID PIN 15 11052'SOUTH of THE PLAN SAFNARO NH.CORNER OF SECTION II,TI25,RISE,AND 61.43'EAST OF THE CENTERLINE OF LA LIGHT POLE CANADA STREET. ELEVATION OF SAID PIN IS 2100.86'. TREE LINE 5. THE BA515 OF BEARINGS IS THE NORTH LINE OF SECTION II,TI25,RISE,G$SRM,PIMA CO., u F—I O2 ARIZONA,AS SHOI4- IN THE BOOK 43 OF SUBDIVISION PLATS AT PAGE 3$8 SAID i�/7 BUSH LINE BEARING BEING N89.52'51.E. OF 32 _ c. ORO VAI,Lre TOWN HALL ADDITION ROOF TILE-MATCH EXISTING (DARKER COLORV It•VICATES EXISTING ADDITION) ADDITION BUILDING r ,,,..,7'''?..--f.-.,'' "',,-• , , •,.. :,-.;-• ' '„,,„ r r: Q F- 1 T �' j--- :� ,- '•> .. 'tea zx r ,i t�;:�llatirfil •��i r i;- �,- + 4 11000 NORM LA GANADA iY - -if` R -1, - ?.• �i. .. /`, :v%;;-' - .� :+,+,r ti, { 9f0;d * TT 1. # ��". k* r w-.z. w TUCSON, 85?3T :S.tk..I.acv}.'r+u.r 4 a.Ixaa.ro,�?•#«: tb' L•q '�y'wg�Y%, ate:nr ;c• ame. cS `:Y "'�j 11°e'`t' .r "3. ''�# AZ STUCCO-MATCH EXISTING 2 COLOR AND TEXTURE(DARKER COLOR INDICATES ADDITION) KEY PLAN I It SOUTHWEST ELEVATION SCALEI In6"=11-0"�.J g , glik,ili'ni o*sim Ii 11 R EXISTING ',"3 i 1 1 A ADDITION EUILDINS _-,, -�__,_-f—T II r-- — I• ! eJ- ! r. N • _�9 ...„. ...-.�.: _ „ ..,..-..... � ....> ,..•. Via=• • •4 - tt ,,.: 1� ��yR f�� �t r: ll- a,`taY;r..;- "a4 �A+:e. xoak.st.- +owP�� ka �...•"g ."a.,se.!, • �"'�' '.- ,�' �. ����i'`�. 'k'4@„tFGF,n�'Cis`^.., ` r /i� / 'a, • 7� '� .,."""' ;..wr ,«,«, wG• �,+�yam.�y C ���- •�.rt.:;. .+ -p.a,y -...r,p �:,u„ a�j3 b� ..�,9• c '� 'It', ,�:: �3g � J , ask,. e5s;.w:s4h<5"+,,rr;P.i rS 1,?1nrc,W fin_; .,,r,ix40.a.r kJ:,,i '+da:c,, A 1.,_r'?344&xYe:.t ..- M,n CE ,F Mf",Z.4, '°'4-It. r40 WINDOW FRAME COLOR- MATCH EXISTING Sakeilar Associates ARCHITECTS AMP FLAMMl R4,IMG. s NORTHINEST ELEVATION SCALE,1/16"•1'-O" o �—_ N UMK M:MAWD LOOK PR.a TIMM,IS`t6704 4 Q 16' ?Hare.( )2nr-n MAW 2 1-254 eAIL,SMOSLAMAOLLOM 8 R 0 EXISTING .. BUILDING ADDITION COLUMN-MATCH EXISTING —1 0 . 1 2 ...,..,. ,...._, �3 5 r 4 c1 ,: ,... ,, : .,". �.,, ..:. ..._ _. ... �: H fit 6 { ..�. �! 1 Li ., k �,. is tF ~:1 ��� f 1 , �' ':... . 1 .: , ' .. -.x+ �..:. ..>,.. Pik - .t r r ,. ...:,.., .�., .:�. �.:. .. ,: . ..:. ....� ,,..;_�', - .<w,.�nLaa'T4a. P>t.:?�?�4.:a__;5.:,.K.:^-EE;�7_,.,t...gin•rv4 1 ._..�t �;S%�s+`R`S '•-e'w�:�l•.a. s ,.,tk=i'�,-f<z;t�E�.E•t::n„u3. .-&,4141.o...wv.2b._. �4�7.a..;l,�.': .,.av�` ? O ,. :,:sT2PvIt,cs r1 �1 ,�� k�:�s-mfi�Y�%rs'�i2kv,.'�•s.e�'!sYt�..�._.:;..Iw.'+.,''L.4s�.a+ a.:.... ,:, :,,. � �aS ,..,,,.,.. , - WINDOW GLAZING- MATCH EXISTING NORTHEAST ELEVATION SCALE ln6"=I'-0"3 N HIV Restacte: n t 4 n Frow....„.F4,, .. EXISTING FACIA BOARD COLOR- % BUILDING ADDITION MATCH EXISTING II1 , ..„......k.,,,, .4„..,,,, .4., ,,.. _ , .... . .. ,.a,,,a,..„ ,_24,4,,,,..,...,.. , -: ... -1 ,-y,2,t,.t.�.•dw4C.su S" '' ,[co�'t - .asXSd& ,!'dp•'�..: �Sys. 'uLdri.� .... _ - _ .. __ +. - ,-,_ ,, 4 ,, v.., F T _ - -, .,F _ _F 3, -R' - - ENT R r;r :.,. . _.. 5" DESIGN DEVELOhM r % ' ' ,- i ,�,''�.'=::,o ", .:•s -;mow. e.rs+. o- _, 11 4 :a, u ,.. .,, r ,, ,-- CONSTRUCTION g -,� j � �i �3 � a � � T � .� Not FOR " it _ to a: ' ./.. . r �:.. ".. .. •: - I 6 ebb .�, �)�T4 iV .... ........ ....x._' a.i•:, �.-.:..... -,_ ,..:., r;�: xkF`5 , .§�'.,. r:.;tw+ .r: 4_�"Aft•-.'6�09 .!W �•.. s @aw t'' .. . N�•h:"b' - ... tC`::�, _ '` a:.7a � ,F.it :. .7. - .,Hv.�s�:k.;?'�..... ^rt� ir{;,33. ep..a:e� � . r, o r . r r DATE: 41/12/1444 w �'.a:•/ .�'rrr� !/y p � r ..! �.r -VD No. 246 3 al PRAM fsr, TCA,JCA CklEG Ev Err, CMS SOUTHEAST ELEVATION SCALE 1/16"=I'-0.O N DP-201 ROB INISH SCM PULE O O VA L.LCY kALLS CtLIN6 ., T ' 54'-0• T 0 Q ,2 Q 0 TOWN HAL1. NO. NA1� rL dS N 5 E W Kr. MrL AREA NOTES 18'-0• �, IS'-0" 18'-0' �, I6'-0• 18'-0• I6'-0" IV-0' --DI IO" 101 REGSFI1ON ere ere - eke 16,90 5.F. Q 05 CORRIDORBIB eke_ - eke 90 5P. C 104 MEWS RSSTROOM 695 ere 6h8 6N8 - 6Y8 .50 5P. ��� - -- - - - A 105 r0!9ENS RESTROOM eke Ere ere ere - eke 150 S.F. 106 LUNCM ROOM 6W8 6WH 6h8 400 SF. `- 107 +EARIN5 ROOM eke 6r8 ere eke 6r8 1,040 Sr. 108 CORRIDOR 6WB 6r8 - eke 81 SP. 10R CONFERENCE ROOM 6r8 ere 6r8 ere - 6Y8 .92 SF. I n no oFFIGE I 6r8 6r8 6r8 ere - 6r8 B S.F. - - - - - - - - - - 1000 NORTH LA GANADA III OFFICE 2 6r8 6r8 ere eke 6r8 B 5F. TUCSON,AZ`85137 - 112 OFFICE 5 . 6We 6N8 6r8 6Y8 - 6r8 118 SF. I i p 115 OFIC.E 4 ere ere ere ere - 6r8 lit S.F. G - n 4 OFFICE 5 6WB 6r8 6I8 eke - ere T5 S.F. / �� i �� 0 IS OFFICE b E{IB 6WB 6r8 6WD Ere 10 5F. I KEY FLAN 54 116 OFFICE? . . ere 6h8 ere bra - 61.8 I10 SP. `' Ili OFFICE 9 6We 6443 ere 6r8 - er8 IC S.F. 1104 1110 I I III I : 1112 I 1113 I 1114 I IS 00441DOR Ewe Ere Ere Ere 45 s.F. I CONFERENCE OFFICE I OFFICE 2 OFFICE 3 OFFICE 4 OFFICE 5 Q 9 IlL E 96W8EreEreEreCE 106WD6WeereereCE IIekeereEre6r8i hiCE 126W8br8Ere6WBIDOReke6reCE 19 6W86rS6r8br8 -CE 14 6WB6W96WB6WBCE I5 6r86r86W6br8CE Ib eWBereereere - ..CE 1 i 6WB6rBEre6r8 - 6re 118 5f.OFFICES eke6r8Orebr8 - 6r8 2:30 Sf, 1 I R001"f 6W56WD - 6We 306 S.F. ROOAE ROOM MRIDQR AGE ROOM •1K ROOM ere ere 6r8 bra - ere 506 5.F. _ ! -• n 55 MEfMANIGAL ROOM 6W5 6r8 6he ere 56 S.F. O73 1 .\ IiL=: I I24OPEN I I8 �J c`��C G 2�f' Associates IOI I I IIG� ® vim.-I C• 9<109f? T I16 -Cl 4 A R G N I i E G T S ARP I L A R M t R S,1 M G. RECEPTION `•� • 1 OFFICES ( �'�'T I Y'? �T O ,� o 103 �.� • f�= I , I 1114 I XI CORRIDOR • 103 • �� I OFFICE 4 u O. .II L' �` ila tix�a �)I 1 105 I , 1104 I -` �\ am"a.e R. 1 s.Ld+ 130 I ` i R. FINISH LEGEND FINISH NOTES (L H J\- IO NS MF�!`2 .� O I 1IC \, " Q - ROOM = �' ��` FILE STOR i I OFFICE 10 41 -� I. b FLOOR 2 .�J _ - . _ _ AN.' I 120. IVVI G CARPET 2. • • - _-'- i I I ! T251 N.k4557MARD LOOK DR.•T96ON,AZ•85704 p -_} t 102 -�-y0� � 12I { -4 VGT VINYL TILE I0 I I F-IONE.(520)31i--rin FAX.24/-2519 c 0 0fti © 84HL:5A1:.AIi*4DLLW _ 0 1 1123 I ' • f OFFICE II SA•� p 121 CONSULTANT: R8 R1J89EI2 SASS .ry ---.-0 'RIDOf2 •D ----'UN ry 01 t I 135) [128 I 112 1 1I 11261 I I�I 1124 I 1122 I "' $ WAILS I MECH. OFFICE 11 . OFFICE 16 . OFFICE IS '' OFFICE 14 ,. OFFICE IS _ OFFICE 12 II fl F FAINT _ I 135 III - -. -� - ---. -'-^'F-_- - - --- 6L 5/8'fiLA°..5 I � - - �-+- I-- b -J�-�+--1---r,.. O 6r8 61?524 HOARD i- - -. - -_ ---- -- - -- -- - -�' i .. _ R6VISIDNS: n 6F GYP.DD.ON 1-12"RIRRIN6 0HANt6L5•24.O.G. CE!LIN& I I .... --- - - -- -- -- --- -- - --- -- --- -- - - - .._- - •1 ere 6YP`SUM HOARD m G,> . Q 0 n . n ✓ N FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/e•=r-0 � • D�SI6N NOT oRDLVJ.CONSTRUCTION O} NT 1 1 z 0 8' . DATE: 1/24/1444 '" J08 No. 246 5 _ DRAWN 9Y: .1G ,TA G4BGKED 5Y: CNS FLOOR PLAN 4 FINISH SCHEDULE A-IOI 60F 32