Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOV129421 ORO VALLEY PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING DATE: September 6, 1994 TO: Development Review Board FROM: Don Chatfield, Planning and Zoning Director SUBJECT: OV 12-94-21, Honey Bee Recreation Area Recreation Plan, Neighborhood 13, Rancho Vistoso BACKGROUND: On August 17, 1994, the Town Council approved the final plat for Rancho Vistoso, Neighborhood 13, Parcel B, Honey Bee Estates. Honey Bee Estates is located on the north side of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard, adjacent to the bridge over Honey Bee Canyon. The subject property has a gross acreage of 96.46 acres and is proposed to have 44 lots for a gross density of.45 units per acre. As one of the preliminary plat conditions, the Development Review Board and the Town Council required that improvements to the Honey Bee Recreation Area must be completed prior to the construction of 40% of the lots in Honey Bee Estates. Subsequent action required the developer to construct only Phase I of the Recreation Area by the time that 40% of Honey Bee Estates is completed. Phase I of the Honey Bee Recreation Area is before you for approval. Improvements in Phase I include a 29-space parking lot, an interpretive overlook, restrooms, a drinking fountoun, two ramadas and picnic tables, interpretive plaques, and a loop trail. The improvements will be funded by the Rancho Vistoso Master Association. Operation and maintenance of this private recreation area will be the responsibility of the Master Association. Development of later phases of the Honey Bee Recreation Area will be tied to the development of other parcels in the area. The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board has reviewed this recreation plan and recommends that the item be continued until the completion of the Honey Bee Canyon Management Plan. The Management Plan will consider vegetation, wildlife, and recreation needs in the area and is slated for completion in December of this year (subject to Council approval of funding). Recommendation Staff concurs with the recommendation of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and recommends the continuance of this item until the regular DRB meeting of January 1995. If the development in Honey Bee Estates reaches the 39% level prior to January, the developer can insure continued development by posting an assurance with the Town in an amount sufficient to construct the amenities proposed on this plan. Suggested Motion The DRB may wish to consider one of the following motions: i I move to continue OV 12-94-21, the recreation area plan for Honey Bee Recreation Area,Neighborhood 6 until the DRB meeting of January 1995. If the developer wishes to construct more than 39% of the dwelling units in Honey Bee Estates, this will be permissible by posting an assurance with the Town in an amount sufficient to construct the amenities proposed on this plan. OR I move to approve OV 12-94-10, the recreation area/final landscape plans for Rancho Vistoso, Neighborhood 5, Parcel T, finding that I move to deny OV 12-94-10,the recreation area/final landscape plans for Rancho Vistoso,Neighborhood 5, Parcel T, finding that 12-94-21\psrept.rec 2 ORO VALLEY PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING DATE: September 6, 1994 TO: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD FROM: Jonathan Crowe, Planner I SUBJECT: OV 12-94-21- Rancho Vistoso, Neighborhood 7, Parcel G, RECREATION AREA LANDSCAPE AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN BACKGROUND: New World Homes, owners of this 5.4 acre parcel located at the southeast corner of Arrowsmith Drive and Woodburne Avenue, requests approval for this Recreation Area Landscape and Development Plan which will serve Parcel G. This property, part of the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development, is abutted on the north by Desert Rose subdivision, on the east by Parcel G, and to the south and west by Parcel F. LANDSCAPE AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN: The site is gently sloped and undisturbed, with heavier density riparian vegetation associated with the major wash which runs generally along the eastern property line. A smaller wash and associated vegetation runs north-south through the proposed ball field. Proposed facilities include a baseball field, 18 space parking lot, sand volleyball court, basketball half- court, sand tot lot, rest rooms, five picnic areas, pedestrian trail and open space. All elements of the plan are proposed to be field located to minimize or avoid disturbance of existing trees and vegetation. However, staff finds that the current design places portions of the volleyball court and the basketball court within the riparian area and, it appears, within the 100-yr flood limits. The plan also locates a retention basin berm such that flooding is possible in the tot lot, the baseball field, and some of the pedestrian trails, including access to the basketball court. In comments to the project landscape architect, Staff raised a concern about the location of the baseball field diamond next to the Desert Rose subdivision. It appears that home plate is located approximately 40 feet from some of the rear lot lines. The DRB may wish to consider requiring the ball field to be moved further away from the adjacent Desert Rose subdivision. Staff also suggested that a shade structure be installed over at least a portion of the tot lot to make it usable year round. The applicant • has not addressed this issue to ; 's satisfaction. The Parks and Recreation Board reviewed this plan on September 1 and the Town Manager has prepared a memo which reflects their comments and/or recommendations. RECOMMENDATION: Given the concerns raised, Planning staff recommends continuance of the Recreation Area Landscape and Development Plan for Rancho Vistoso, Parcel G to allow the applicant additional time to resolve Staffs concerns. Attachments: 1. Recreation Area Landscape and Development Plan f:\...\12-94-22\rec.rpt OI ALLEY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTME ENGINEER'S REPORT MEETING DATE: September 6, 1994 TO: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD DATE: September 6, 1994 FROM: Joanne Homer Civil Engineer SUBJECT: OV12-94-21 RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 7 PARCEL G RECREATION AREA LANDSCAPE/DEVELOPMENT PLAN Public Works Staff has reviewed the above subject development and recommends continuance of the proposed landscape/development plan so that consulting engineer can address the following issues: 1. All sight visibility triangles shall be shown on the plan. 2. Centerline offsets of not less than 150 feet shall be provided: 1) between the northern driveway and the proposed street entrance to Desert Rose subdivision and 2) between the two driveways entering the Parcel G recreation area. 3. The curb radii for each driveway shall be modified from 18 feet to 25 feet. 4. The note on sheet L-2 shall be revised to read"The Rancho Vistoso Master Home Owners Association shall accept responsibility for maintenance, control, safety, and liability of these facilities." 5. The design speed and design vehicle shall be noted on the development plan. 6. For each drainage course for which the 100-year frequency flood equals or exceeds 50 cubic feet per second at the point of entering and leaving the site, the limits of the pre- and post-development flood-prone area shall be labeled. 7. Boundary closure calculations shall be provided for the above-referenced development plan. Boundary lines, bearings and distances with at least two ties to section corners or quarter corners shall be shown on the development plan. 8. A drainage statement shall be provided to the Town of Oro Valley Public Works Department and shall contain the following information: a. Pre- and post-development 100-year floodplain limits. b. Calculations for retention requirements. c. An analysis showing how this down-stream retention basin will assist in meeting the necessary retention requirements of up-stream development. 9. The retention basin volume shall be shown on the development plan. f:\...\rv7grec.pwd • - ORO VALLEY PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING DATE: September 6, 1994 TO: Development Review Board FROM: Linda Frew, Planner I SUBJECT: OV 12-94-21 HONEY BEE PARK RECREATION CENTER OV12-94-22 RANCHO VISTOSO, NEIGHBORHOOD 7, NEIGHBORHOOD RECREATION CENTER. PARCEL G (AND TRAIL PLAN) OV12-94-23 RANCHO VISTOSO,NEIGHBORHOOD 10,NEIGHBORHOOD RECREATION CENTER NO. 1 (BETWEEN L AND MI OV 12-94-10A RANCHO VISTOSO, NEIGHBORHOOD 5, PARCEL T, RECREATION CENTER (TRAIL PLAN) The above-referenced revised recreation area plans are included in this packet for your review. They will be discussed in study session on September 6th and during regular session that same evening, the DRB may take action on same, if desired. The original recreation plans for these four projects were submitted for Staff review some time ago and our comments were relayed to the project engineer on August 19th. Plans prepared in response to our comments were received in our office on September 2nd. Time did not allow for Staff review and report preparation prior to packet distribution, because these plans have been accelerated in the review process by one week. In lieu of said reports, we are sending you a copy of our transmittal to the project engineer, including Staff's initial comments on these plans, to give you some indication of our concerns. We do plan an in-depth review of the revised recreation area plans and will attempt to have staff reports ready for your review at, or before, meeting time. ovcases\recpin.drb 09-06-94 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING MINUTES PAGE 2 OV 12-94-21 RANCHO VISTOSO, NEIGHBORHOOD 7, NEIGHBORHOOD RECREATION CENTER, PARCEL G (AND TRAIL PLAN) The staff report was read by Jonathan Crowe. Walt Wind asked for questions of staff. There were none. He then asked for comments from the petitioner. Tim Ensign, The WLB Group, was present. He was not in agreement with the tot lot shade. Staff suggested that a portion be shaded but was questioning the entire tot lot area be covered with some type of shade structure. Walt Wind was in agreement with the covering. Richard Underwood said being familiar with county parks, i.e., Children's Memorial Park could not recall a shaded park. Staff member, Jonathan Crowe stated staff's opinion as this being a feasible proposal. Richard Underwood said the Children's Memorial Park has grass around the sand area and there are trees planted which will provide some natural cooling but almost any shade structure requires railroad ties or something obtrusive. Richard Underwood was concerned with the 100 year floodplain issue and its importance. Mr. Crowe referred this to the Public Works Department. Joanne Homer said this particular area is serving retention needs for other subdivisions in the area and as part of those subdivision's approvals, they were to provide .73 acre feet of retention. Engineering staff requested additional information from the engineer to explain exactly how they are going to meet that requirement and how this works in with the recreational plans. 09-O6-94 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING MINUTES PAGE 3 Therefore, staff recommended a continuance at this time. Earl McCamic asked staff to clarify their recommendation of "a portion." Mr. Crowe said, another way to address this concern is to assure that the tot lot is not placed in an area that is exposed in the middle of an area and does not have any kind of landscaping or trees. Staff would like some type of visual and environmental relief. Richard Underwood suggested incorporation of a sprinkler system. Staff replied that this would be a possible solution. Bill Adler asked what type of ball would be played, i.e., softball or hardball. Mr. Ensign said it is suitable for both, although it is smaller than regulation (not for league play). Bill Adler was concerned with errant balls hitting homes or parked cars. He said another option would be to have the diamond at the opposite end of the area, looking north. Mr. Ensign said the town could limit usage to softball only and state that as a condition. He offered a backstop facility and would work this out with staff. Richard Underwood stated that ball fields are in great demand and you will find leagues practicing wherever a field is available. He suggested a backstop be installed and this would alleviate danger to the homes. Bill Adler said that tends to work for balls hit directly back, but foul balls hit beyond the backstop will still pose a problem. He again suggested movement of the diamond to the opposite end which would, in his opinion, solve the problem. Mr. Ensign said he was confident that he was willing to work with staff on other issues. Walt Wind asked for input from the Parks Advisory Board. Ms. Baker was in support of this plan. Walt Wind opened the study session to the public. There were no comments from the audience. He then moved on to the next item. ( 6-94 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING MINUTES PAGE 7 OV12-94-21 RANCHO VISTOSO, NEIGHBORHOOD 7, NEIGHBORHOOD RECREATION CENTER, PARCEL G (AND TRAIL PLAN) The staff report was read by Joanne Homer of the Public Works Department. Tim Ensign stated that he had no problem with staff recommendations. He requested approval subject to staff conditions. Shirley Lee asked staff to clarify the amendment to the shade structure. Staff agreed with trees being used as a substitute for the shade structure. Bill Adler requested clarification regarding the floodplain issues, and if this was still an issue. Jonathan Crowe said this is still a concern and has not been resolved. Joanne Homer said she would like to see this item continued, and, if the board votes to approve she suggested that the plans be approved by staff prior to going to council. Shirley Lee stated that too many issues are unresolved. Bill Adler said it is a question of whether they can stipulate that these matters can be resolved along with the board's approval to stipulate these prior to going to council; or continue it. The Chairman entertained a motion. Shirley Lee MOVED to CONTINUE OV 12-94-21 RANCHO VISTOSO, NEIGHBORHOOD 7, NEIGHBORHOOD RECREATION CENTER, PARCEL G (AND TRAIL PLAN) to the September 13 DRB meeting. Bill Adler SECONDED. The MOTION CARRIED 5-1, Wells opposed. _ -9 -\ -2\ 0SA inc. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSUI.TAI`iT% 4801 Lust rtrst street•Tucson.Arizona 85711 (602)325-9194•FAX(602)325-2033 September 16, 1994 Mr. Jim DeGrood Town Engineer Town of Oro Valley 11000 North La Canada Drive Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 797-9797 (voice); 297-0428 (fax) RE: ARCHAEOLOGICAL CLEARANCE RECOMMENDATION FO RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 7, PARCELS G, H, AND T Dear Jim: At the request of Tim Ensign of the WLB Group, SWCA has completed a cul ural resource evaluation of Parcels G, H, and T of Neighborhood 7 on the Rancho Vistoso Propert . According to records housed at the Arizona State Museum in Tucson (the official state repository for archaeological materials and records),no archaeological or historical sites have been recorde on any of these parcels. The parcels were archaeologically surveyed by the Institute for Americas Research in 1986. As described in the published report, the methods used during the survey m•et modern professional standards for a Class III (full pedestrian) cultural resource inventory. Consequently, SWCA recommends that archaeological clearance be granted pursuant to the issuance of a grading permit by the Town of Oro Valley. If you have any question. regarding this project, please contact me in SWCA's Tucson office. Sincerely, Thomas N. Motsinger Project Archaeologist • cc: Tim Ensign/WL)3 T. Euler/SWCA D, 1W',1u,.9•1771D2UROODl.2.8r ALBUQUERQUE • AUSTIN • DURANGO • FLAGSTAFF • RENO • SALT LAKE CIT • SCOTTSDALE • TUCSON Ce9 Gtb=bT VG, 9T d9S E0d 90T 9N I UDMS 220ESEEE09T „Ft V026/,y . ALLIED CONSTRUCTION INC. 1741 North 6th Ave., Tucson, AZ 85705 (602) 882-6595 FAX (602) 882-5573 I September 26, 1994 Mr. Don Chatfield RECt/v Planning &Zoning, Development Services C® Town of Oro Valley SEP 2 7 1994 11000 N. La Canada Dr. Oro Valley, AZ 85737 Town °f Oro Va! Bey Dear Mr. Chatfield, This is a request to be placed on the agenda of the DRB Meeting, scheduled for October 10, 1994, in regards to a concern that we have with the park development south of Desert Rose. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me at 740-1330. Sincerely, Rosanna Madril signing for, Omid Z. Rouhani, Architect Allied Construction Inc. 1'4 71- 4) ,A r. . . • • lin :IC = can u C •. it CA OD V) - OD , CA -.0 OD ,....1- n) If) cA rr- u) CA ,..i.- ... CA CA CA CA CA CA CA C4 CA CA CA CA CA ,--4 i.1 1! JP- r...N (-) r ! il 1 . 0" Cl n r, C.:I r, ck F. I . V) 11\4 0) A) 11) U) ,--1 r---. 15) u-i u-.! (t ,..-4 4) CI op —4 V) CA 0" C4 ittlanunCtitinur..4 3 a • c n "0 r.... 0) i...) 0) 0- OD CA 0- --r) -.0 cl r-- CA CA ._, u.: ri riJ - -, - it.4 .4 ! :: C...1 CA C.4 CA C.4 C.1 CA CA CA CA CA 1— CA CA CA I— CA rii ..t., ,) r r+ -,---1 Cr' !!") !•-•-• I....I rp, r.:, ....x. 1:::1 CI SI ED CD ED CD ED t:TD CD E.7..1 C.,.-:,1 ED CA r-7.1 _ 0- ED ED ED ED CD ED ED CD ED CD CD rn # # # # = # # # . # # u • • t......: ON -1— J_ 4- .-. ,..... f..) C4 C4 --1 1.5; er in 1..**4 r,.•;:1 (r ,,...., :....1.-, !•-•-# 0 0 DJ IS E-.1 -...- - L. ,... .... 0 0) to ED rn i...1 -:z. "..--,- Lii i!I Li.] -,,F* 7, :"• DJ .,....„. ..:-.... ......,_ ....::. -......!„ ,...,.., !.ii 1..0 cD ED ED ED CA -1 =-1 ) N. -,--4 V) •40 r."..) r", r) 40 V) I') V) CD V.! ED -.> --1.- -.., (...r.: -.0 -.0 ',.:1- Cr- Li.) ...--i 0) e•-pi i I 4.21 Li) '::".1" 1.17! l! •,--i .---1 ri i -, v- J.... :....7:; V) 4) r) A) A) .z...-,-_ 4- •• ,--i ',0 C.,i V) 03 u) (7.1 C4 0) CD OD ED OD -4 ..-1- ,J.. ii....i CO 0" Cr' .7 CO 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) OD 21 CO 2: ID 77 Co 2: 0) Y) Li u*) r) ....:, , .... 0...... .,..i ,1 . Cci ..-1- L. 1.0 i.,... ED ED '7.`i fri Cr- Cl ED ED it; 03 Cr:. 03 CO r, r.-.. r, r-- r- r., r, OD r) CD Cii ct y) T-4 ED al oD 117.3 ,-.1 ...-1 ,A ,A ,i ,A ,-.1 ,A ,1 ,--1 CA 111 CD e) CA u-i D Cl C4 Cl CI CA CA CA cA CA CA CA H c CD V) 1! CA H CD illt1111111 I-5 7.311ili ip I .. u-i .... ..... 0) nt ,--i C.4 ,A r, ...0 V) 7t r) s 4J 1..- ED 0' C4 4J L. iS irj CO ,...1., +-I .r1 ,--1 •r-i ,--1 -r-4 s.--1 -r-1 ,-A +-A .--I a! .1.: CA is 0 0! ..c: cl L CI CA C4 CA C4 CA CA CA C4 CA C4 a Lp CA ED ED CI Lp r.) :r • ITEM 10 ORO VALLEY PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING DATE: October 11, 1994 TO: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD FROM: Jonathan Crowe, Planner I DATE: October 5, 1994 SUBJECT: OV 12-94-21 Rancho Vistoso, Neighborhood 7, Parcel G, RECREATION AREA LANDSCAPE AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN BACKGROUND: New World Homes, owners of this 5.4 acre parcel located at the southeast corner of Arrowsmith Drive and Woodburne Avenue, requests approval for this Recreation Area Landscape and Development Plan which will serve Parcel G. This property, part of the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development, is abutted on the north by Desert Rose subdivision, on the east by Parcel G, and to the south and west by Parcel F. The DRB, on September 6, voted 5-1 to continue this case based on drainage concerns. An excerpt from these minutes is provided as an attachment to this report. On September 15, the DRB again voted 7-0 to continue this item to allow the applicant more time. The applicant is currently working with Engineering staff to resolve these concerns. Another issue has been raised by the Desert Rose subdivision architect who is concerned about the close proximity of the baseball field to five lots in the Desert Rose subdivision. Staff acknowledges that the baseball field is located approximately 40 feet from the rear lot lines of these lots. However, Staff finds this recreation area to be an amenity, especially to prospective h'_me buyers with children. Given that there are only five lots located close to the baseball field, Staff does not recommend moving the ball field from its present location. Staff notes that the present location minimizes disturbance of riparian vegetation. LANDSCAPE AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN: The site is gently sloped and undisturbed, with heavier density riparian vegetation associated with the major wash which runs generally along the eastern property line. A smaller wash and associated vegetation runs north-south through the proposed ball field. Proposed facilities include a baseball field, 18 space parking lot, sand volleyball court, basketball half- court, sand tot lot, rest rooms, five picnic areas, pedestrian trail and open space. All elements of the plan are proposed to be field located to minimize or avoid disturbance of existing trees and vegetation. The Parks and Recreation Board reviewed this plan on September 1 and has no objection to this development plan. RECOMMENDATION: Provided that drainage issues have been adequately addressed to Engineering staff's satisfaction, Planning staff recommends approval of the Recreation Area Landscape and Development Plan for Rancho Vistoso, Parcel G, as submitted. Attachments: 1. Recreation Area Landscape and Development Plan. 2. Excerpt from DRB minutes, dated September 6, 1994. 3. Staff report to DRB, dated September 6, 1994. f:\...\12-94-21\rpt2.drb OR LLLEY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTME] ENGINEER'S REPORT MEETING DATE: October 11, 1994 TO: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD DATE: October 3, 1994 FROM: Joanne Homer Civil Engineer SUBJECT: OV12-94-21 RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 7 LANDSCAPE/DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PARCEL G) Public Works Staff has reviewed the above subject development and recommends continuance of this landscape/development plan in order for the following conditions to be addressed: 1. A drainage statement shall be provided to the Town of Oro Valley Public Works Department and shall contain the following information: a. Pre- and post-development 100-year flows which enter the retention basin. b. An analysis which demonstrates that the retention basin as provided (i.e., 1.26 acre-feet) will in fact retain up to 0.73 acre-feet of stormwater. 2. All sight visibility triangles shall be labeled with distances. \...\12-94-21\dftdrbrp.pwd Ci OR( LLEY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMEP ENGINEERS REPORT e-1,, MEETING DATE: October 11, 1994 TO: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD DATE: October 4, 1994 FROM: Joanne Homer 416454L--. Civil Engineer SUBJECT: OV12-94-21 RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 7 LANDSCAPE/DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PARCEL G) SUMMARY The first Engineer's Report to the DRB, presented September 6, 1994, recommended continuance so that nine conditions could be addressed by WLB. Subsequent to the September 6th DRB meeting, WLB has addressed most of these conditions to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department. There still remains one significant issue related to the proposed retention basin. The plat for Parcel G was approved on the condition that the retention requirements of that plat would be met within the proposed recreation area. To date,the Public Works staff has not received adequate information to show that the retention basin as proposed will indeed meet the 0.73 acre-feet retention requirement for the Parcel G plat. Staff has spoken to WLB and we are awaiting hydrologic information from WLB to verify the effectiveness of this retention basin as designed. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Public Works Staff has reviewed the above subject development. Because of the critical nature of the retention requirements, Public Works staff recommends continuance of this landscape/development plan in order for the following conditions to be addressed: 1. A drainage statement shall be provided to the Town of Oro Valley Public Works Department and shall contain the following information: a. All pre- and post-development 100-year flows which enter the retention basin. b. An analysis which demonstrates that the retention basin as provided (i.e., 1.26 acre-feet) will in fact retain a minimum of 0.73 acre-feet of stormwater. 2. All sight visibility triangles shall be labeled with distances. \...\12-94-21\drbrpt.pwd DRAFT 10-11--94 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD SING MINUTES PAGE 20 9. OV12-94-10B RANCHO VISTOSO, NEIGHBORHOOD 5, PARCEL T, FINAL LANDSCAPE PLAN The staff report was read by Linda Frew. Bill Walker of the WLB Group said the staff condition is acceptable. Richard Stakey made a brief presentation. Walt Wind asked what the landscape package consisted of? Mr. Stakey said they offer a choice of two or three packages: 1) a natural desert landscape package that would include native plants and cacti; and 2) a non-traditional landscape package which includes two 15 gallon trees. The homeowner has a choice. Most of the homeowners choose the desert package because of the low water use. Walt Wind asked if a irrigation system is included with the package? Mr. Stakey said, not with the desert package; but it is an option. Richard Underwood informed Mr. Stakey that a drip irrigation system is needed until the trees are established. Mr. Stakey agreed. The Chairman entertained a motion. Walt Wind MOVED to APPROVE OV12-94-10B RANCHO VISTOSO, NEIGHBORHOOD 5, PARCEL T, FINAL LANDSCAPE PLAN subject to staff recommendation: 1. The wash area along the northern border of Parcel T shall be fenced off during construction and protected from disturbance. Matthew Moutafis SECONDED. The MOTION CARRIED 6-0. 10. OV12-94-21 RANCHO VISTOSO,NEIGHBORHOOD 7,PARCEL G,RECREATION CENTER (AND TRAIL PLAN) This item was continued from the 9-13-94 DRB meeting and Rancho Vistoso Partners, . . DRAFT 1011--94 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING MINUTES PAGE 21 again, request a continuance to the next DRB meeting to allow the project engineer to address concerns raised by DRB members and Staff. Walt Wind MOVED to CONTINUE OV 12-94-21 RANCHO VISTOSO, NEIGHBORHOOD 7, PARCEL G, RECREATION CENTER(AND TRAIL PLAN) to the November 9 DRB meeting. Bill Adler SECONDED. MOTION CARRIED 6-0. C.0 ALLIED CONSTRUCTION INC. 1741 North 6th Ave., Tucson, AZ 85705 (602) 882-6595 FAX (602) 882-5573 illeffur October 21, 1994 OCT d t_�.� y4 row r7 of n Mr. Don Chatfield Planning &Zoning, Development Services Town of Oro Valley 11000 N. La Canada Dr. Oro Valley, AZ 85737 Dear Mr. Chatfield, I would like to request that our name be removed from the next DRB since the concerns we had in regards to the recreation park adjacent to the Desert Rose project have all been resolved by Rancho Vistoso Partners Corporation. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me at 740-1330. Sincerely, Rosanna Madril signing for, Omid Z. Rouhani, Architect Allied Construction Inc. • ITEM 3 C� ORO VALLEY PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING DATE: November 8, 1994 TO: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD FROM: Jonathan Crowe, Planner I SUBJECT: OV 12-94-21 Rancho Vistoso, Neighborhood 7, Parcel G, RECREATION AREA LANDSCAPE AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN BACKGROUND: New World Homes, owners of this 5.4 acre parcel located at the southeast corner of Arrowsmith Drive and Woodburne Avenue, requests approval for this Recreation Area Landscape and Development Plan which will serve Neighborhood 7 and portions of Neighborhood 5. This property, part of the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development, is abutted on the north by Desert Rose subdivision (21 lots approved), on the east by Parcel G (122 lots approved), and to the south and west by Parcel F (vacant, 244 lots planned). The DRB, on October 11, voted 6-0 to continue this case based on drainage concerns. An excerpt from these minutes and previous Staff reports are provided as attachments to this report. The applicant is currently working with Engineering staff to resolve drainage concerns. Another issue which was raised by the Desert Rose architect is the close proximity of the baseball field to five lots in the Desert Rose subdivision. The applicant has moved the ball field approximately 150 feet south from its former location. A revised plan was submitted on October 24, 1994. LANDSCAPE AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN: This park will serve Neighborhood 7 and portions of Neighborhood 5. This neighborhood has a projected population of approximately 4,600 people. 861 lots have been built or approved to date, yielding a population of approximately 1,908 people. The site is gently sloped, with dense riparian vegetation associated with the major wash which runs generally along the eastern property line. A smaller wash and associated vegetation runs north-south through the proposed ball field. The plan indicates that the smaller wash will be filled. Proposed facilities include a baseball field, 20 space parking lot, sand volleyball court, basketball half- court, sand tot lot, rest rooms, five picnic areas, pedestrian trail and open space. All elements of the plan are proposed to be located to minimize or avoid disturbance of existing trees and vegetation. The Parks and Recreation Board reviewed this plan on September 1 and has not yet voiced any opposition to this development plan and landscape plan. • RECOMMENDATION: Planning staff recommends continuance of the Recreation Area Landscape and Development Plan for Rancho Vistoso, Parcel G, to allow the applicant additional time to address the following conditions: 1. Drainage issues shall be addressed to Engineering staff's satisfaction; 2. Add pre- and post-development flood limits; 3. Re-locate the sand volleyball court (and associated grading) approximately 100 feet west and 50 feet north of its present location to remove it from the floodplain and associated riparian area, as required by the Zoning Code, Sec. 4-504.D.13; 4. Provide additional screening (trees, berm, and/or wall) along Woodburne Ave. to screen the re-located volleyball court from the street; 5. Provide inventory of native plants, both those to be saved in place and those to be salvaged and relocated on-site; 6. Provide approximate area in drainageways, natural open space, and developed (graded) areas; 7. Show parking space calculations; 8. Provide additional screening between the parking area and Woodburne Ave., which shall include a landscaped berm no less than three feet in height, a three foot high masonry wall, or a combination thereof. Attachments: 1. Revised Recreation Area Landscape and Development Plan. 2. Staff report to DRB, dated October 5, 1994. 3. Excerpt from DRB minutes, dated October 11, 1994. 4. Engineering Staff report, dated October 3, 1994. 5. Staff report to DRB, dated September 6, 1994. 6. Excerpt from DRB minutes, dated September 6, 1994. f:\...\12-94-21\rpt3.drb ORO v,ALLEY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMEI\L C" ENGINEER'S REPORT MEETING DATE: November 8, 1994 TO: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD DATE: November 2, 1994 FROM: Joanne Homer5C.,/-2%, Civil Engineer SUBJECT: OV12-94-21 RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 7 LANDSCAPE/DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PARCEL G) SUMMARY The first Engineer's Report to the DRB, presented September 6, 1994, recommended continuance so that nine conditions could be addressed by WLB. The second Engineer's Report to the DRB, presented October 11, 1994, also recommended continuance so that two remaining conditions could be addressed. The most significant issue related to this proposed recreation plan is the retention basin required for off-site subdivisions. The plat for Parcel G was approved on the condition that the retention requirements for thattlat would be met within the proposed recreation area. On October 24, 1994, Staff received a drainage report from WLB which analyzed the retention requirements for the proposed recreation plan. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Public Works Staff has reviewed the above subject development and would not object to the approval of this landscape/development plan provided that the following conditions are met: 1. All revisions and corrections as noted on the drainage report shall be addressed to the satisfaction of the Town Engineer. A resubmittal of the landscape/development plan and revised drainage report addressing all these conditions shall be submitted to the Town of Oro Valley on or before November 23, 1994 in order to be scheduled for the December 7, 1994 Town Council Meeting. f:\...\12-94-21\drbrpt3.pwd 11-08-94 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MELTING MINUTES 9 3. OV 12-94-21 RANCHO VISTOSO, NEIGHBORHOOD 7, RECREATION AREA PLAN The staff report was read by Kevin Kish. Joanne Homer presented the Engineer's report. The petitioner present was Tim Ensign of the WLB Group representing Rancho Vistoso Partners. Tim said he had reviewed the staff comments and has no problems with meeting conditions. Walt Wind said the plan he was looking at shows the volleyball court further south than what was displayed. Tim Ensign said this reflects the revisions made when he received comments yesterday from staff. Bill Adler asked what the distance is of the volleyball court from the property line to the adjacent property. Tim Ensign said staff requested that the court be moved about 100 feet further to the east which this revised plan reflects. Bill Adler was concerned with the noise level. He was also concerned with the juxtaposition of the basketball court to the baseball field. He asked if people playing basketball could be hit by foul balls. Tim Ensign said the way the field has been arranged, this would be impossible. Richard Underwood stated that the odds of foul balls are very slim. Shirley Lee pointed out that the tot lot has a wrought iron fence around it. Bill Zadina introduced himself to the board. Mr. Zadina lives in the neighborhood and suggested some minor changes. He said there is no lighting specified in this document, therefore, he requested that some safety lighting be placed around the parking lot and the restrooms, and around the volleyball court. He said volleyball is basically a daytime sport, but it may be played towards the sunset times. He asked if lighting could be added to the facility and make it a useful facility for evening use. He also stated that this lighting would be helpful for police patrol. 11-08-94 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING MINUTES 10 Tim Ensign favored some low intensity perimeter lighting of the parking lot (bollards/low intensity) lighting and for the volleyball court. Maybe some with a 90% cut-off fixture would be acceptable. Bill Adler was concerned with the lights affecting homes. Mr. Zadina said, as a homeowner it was his opinion that lighting is a plus. He said the homeowner is either positively attracted to it or not.. Richard Underwood said the spirit of cooperation between the developer and the homeowners should make a good project. Richard Underwood MOVED TO APPROVE OV12-94-21 RANCHO VISTOSO, NEIGHBORHOOD 7, RECREATION AREA PLAN subject to staff conditions: 1. Drainage issues shall be addressed to Engineering staff's satisfaction; 2. Add pre- and post-development flood limits; 3. Re-locate the sand volleyball court (and associated grading) approximately 100 feet west and 50 feet north of its present location to remove it from the floodplain and associated riparian area, as required by the Zoning Code, Sec. 4-504.D.13; 4. Provide additional screening (trees, berm, and/or wall) along Woodburne Ave. to screen the re-located volleyball court from the street; 5. Provide inventory of native plants, both those to be saved in place and those to be salvaged and relocated on-site; 6. Provide approximate area in drainageways, natural open space, and developed (graded) areas; 7. Show parking space calculations; 8. Provide additional screening between the parking area and Woodburne Ave., which shall include a landscaped berm no less than three feet in height, a three foot high masonry wall, or a combination thereof. Also, with the request of the homeowners regarding the lighting per discussion tonight consistent with the Town Code. Walt Wind SECONDED. MOTION CARRIED 6-0. ti ORO VALLEY PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: December 7, 1994 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL FROM: Linda Frew, Planner I SUBJECT: OV 12-94-21 Rancho Vistoso, Neighborhood 7, Neighborhood Recreation Center (in Parcel G) SUMMARY: In accordance with the adopted master plan for Rancho Vistoso, a portion of Parcel G, Neighborhood 7, has been set aside to serve as a recreational facility to serve a projected population of approximately 5,000 people. The project engineers, WLB, on behalf of the property owner, New World Homes, have presented a landscape/development plan for a 5.4 acre parcel of land, which is located on the east side of the Woodburne Ave. alignment, west of New World's future project in Parcel G. The recreational facility, as proposed, features a baseball field, a 20 space parking lot, sand volleyball court, a basketball half-court, sand tot lot, restrooms, five picnic areas, pedestrian trail and open space. The DRB reviewed and recommended approval to Council of the revised plans, as submitted, with one added condition relating to security/night lighting, as set forth below. The DRB reviewed at least two versions of the recreation area plan and, ultimately, voted to recommend approval, with the condition listed below, on November 8, 1994. It should be noted that the Parks Advisory Board has also reviewed the plan and voiced no objection to it, as submitted. RECOMMENDATION: All Engineering concerns have been addressed and the Town Engineer has no objection to approval of this plan. Finding that the recreational area for Parcel G, and the proposed amenities therefor, meet the intent of the adopted Rancho Vistoso PAD and the Town's requirement for the provision of recreational areas, Planning Staff recommends approval of the plan dated October 24th, as submitted, with DRB's added condition below: "Lighting, which conforms to the Oro Valley Lighting Code (Article 6-7, Oro Valley Town Code), with the lowest standard height and intensity possible, shall be provided for security in the parking lot, and to light the sand volleyball court for night-time use." SUGGESTED MOTION: The Council may wish to consider one of the following motions: I move to approve OV12-94-21, Rancho Vistoso, Neighborhood 7, Recreation Area Plan (Parcel G) as submitted on October 24, 1994, and as forwarded by the DRB, with the following added DRB condition: "Lighting, which conforms to the Oro Valley Lighting Code (Article 6-7, Oro Valley Town Code) with the lowest standard height and intensity possible, shall be provided for security in the parking lot, and to light the sand volleyball court for night-time use." OR I move to approve OV 12-94-21, Rancho Vistoso, Neighborhood 7, Recreation Area Plan (Parcel G) as submitted on October 24, 1994, and as forwarded by the DRB, with the DRB condition listed above and the following added conditions: OR I move to deny OV12-94-21, Rancho Vistoso, Neighborhood 7, Recreation Area Plan (Parcel G), finding that: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Staff Reports to DRB 2. Engineering Staff Report to DRB 3. Reductions of recreation area plan Department Head Town Manager 12-94-21\recplan.tcc 12/19/94 13:22 b 602 831 1330 Z]003 Vistoso Partners 5861 ,S. Kyrene Rd., Suite 1 Tempe, AZ 85283 602-831-2000 Mary Jo Peterson December 19, 1994 Town of Oro Valley 11000 N. La Canada Dr. Oro Valley,AZ 85737 Subject: Rancho Vistoso Golf Course Permit Dear Mary Jo, Please be advised that the Tovin of Oro Valley has our authorization to hold $5.O 000 from the Rancho Vistoso A.P.A. account for the purpose of a re-seeding bond for holes 1, 3 and the driving range of Neighborhood 10 golf course. We are in the process of providing a $300,000 C.D. as the permanent re-seeding bon4 for the total golf course at which time the funds being held in the A.P.A. account will be available for miscellaneous permit fees. If there are any questions regarding this matter please contact me. Sincerely, Richard Maes RM/pls • 2t TA% Engineering • Planning Surveying•Urban Design Landscape Architecture roup Inc. December 19, 1994 Ms. Joanne Homer c�` Yat 4 is Town of Oro Valley OFF 1994 11000 North La Canada Drive ti RECEIVED Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 TOWN OF ORO ALLEY e PUMA WORKS co Subject: Rancho Vistoso, Neighborhood 7, �oOEMTMENT 6' Parcel G Recreation Center � �,,' ' WLB No. 194009-A-001-0400 891►e Dear Ms. Homer: During the course of developing a workable landscape and development plan for the above referenced parcel , and in conjunction with interfacing with the client, it became necessary to alter the configuration of the retention basin. This came as a result of trying to minimize the amount of bank protection required along the east property line. On Friday, December 9, 1994, we submitted the altered landscape and development plan for Rancho Vistoso, Neighborhood 7, Parcel G Recreation Center. Hydraulically, this represented a minor change in the drainage concept in that the basin configuration and location were altered from the drainage report, as submitted on October 24, 1994. The new configuration for the basin was analyzed to determine whether the volumetric capacity of the basin was adequate relative to the overall regional retention requirements as reported in the "Summary of Retention Basins in Rancho Vistoso, Neighborhoods 5, 7 and 10" revised October 26, 1994. It was determined that the retention volume for the new configuration had not changed from that which was reported in the drainage report for the Parcel G Recreation Center (0.95 ac-ft) . Furthermore, a basin routing was performed to determine the maximum water surface elevation for the 100-year event. The weir invert was set at 2802 and the maximum 100-year water surface elevation in the weir was 2802. 19. Please find attached a copy of the flood routings for the 2- and 100-year events through the basin, as well as a map showing the location and configuration of the retention basin, as proposed in the landscape and development plan, submitted on December 9, 1994. It should be noted that the original hydraulic intent for the drainage relative to the Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 7, Parcel G Recreation Center has not been altered or compromised. Engineering • Planning • Surveying • Urban Design • Landscape Architecture Offices located in Tucson, Phoenix, Las Vegas, and Victor Valley, California 4444 East Broadway • Tucson, Arizona 85711 • (602) 881-7480 • FAX (602) 881-7492 , T vilet3 Group Inc Ms. Joanne Homer . December 19, 1994 Page 2. If you have any questions or comments, feel free to call Tracy Bogardus or Tim Ensign at 881-7480. Sincerely, THE WLB GROUP, INC. lc 6r 5 1)5 `• .';. I 4 T1 ; 10 Y lit NSI vnetl, 1 I NA Timothy T. Ensign, P.E. TTE:hg Attachment . V V ?' 'Pv f o -� L L '` G )�'-( D } - -pOYZI • ttli B • roup.. further verified with a conversation on April 18, 1994 with Bill Snell at Pima County Floodplain Management Department, who will corroborate this find. Therefore, a 10 percent reduction in the rate of discharge will not be necessary. Due to the proposed density (4.2 R.A.C. ) , this project falls into the criteria for 2-year threshold retention as established within Pima County' s retention/ �'' detention manual . It will be required to retain the difference in volume between the developed and the existing 2-year events. The required retention volume for 't the site has been estimated to be 0.73 ac-ft. or 31 ,834 cubic feet. A good location for this facility is in the excluded parcel directly west of the site '''_ (see Drainage Concept) . This area has been designated as a recreation area . according to the Rancho Vistoso P.A.D. and Community Plan, and is currently owned N. by the developer. It will be the responsibility of the Rancho Vistoso Community "" Association to maintain the basin. A 5 foot berm protected with hand placed rock . ` riprap on 3 : 1 slopes will be used to form the retention basin. Flows entering _= the site which generate runoff volumes greater than the capacity of the basin Y' T. will weir over the top of the berm and enter D2-Wash as they do under existing f . conditions . The basin has a capacity of 0.80 ac-ft. , however, only 0.73 ac-ft. it of retention is required for this development. This allows for an excess of 0.07 h .ram ' ac-ft. which can be applied to future retention requirements. The 2-year and . 100-year post-development discharges (61 .4 and 179.3 cfs respectively) have been t.. ,: flood routed using the top of the berm as a broad-crested weir. The results indicate that the required volume has been retained during the 2-year storm and . that a maximum weir depth of 0.5 feet is attained during the 100-year storm. The 4:' peak flow during the 100-year storm was also reduced from 179.3 cfs to 171 .5 cfs. r' . Minimum finished floor elevations (F.F.E. 's) were established for the site. The F.F.E. 's were set to be at least one foot above the post-development 100-year :r"-_ water surface elevation in the D2-Wash. .R . ,:�Y 14 .. .Y. FLOOD ]UTINO JOB NAME: W000BURNE AVE EVENT: 2 WLB JOB #: 194009A0010040 BASIN: WOODBUR.NE RETENTION/DETENTION BASIN OUTLET WORKS: 165' WEIR BY: SWH TOTAL NUMBER OF MEMBERS: 1 NUMBER OF HEADWAY MEMBERS: 1 NUMBER OF RESERVOIRS: 1 NUMBER OF TIME PERIODS: 40 TIME STEP (HRS): .0333 STAGE DISCHARGE STORAGE (ft.) (cfs) (cu.ft.) 2798 0 3540 2802 .0001 45592 2803 483.45 63391 2804 1367 90776 P I PlA COLJNTY HYDROORAPH WASH/SITE• PARCEL 6 AT. RETURN PERIQD• 2 DATE• 121494 BY• SWH PEAK R = 31 CFS. Tc = 13 sin. TL = 19.42 sin. &T = 2 sin. T= 0.00 sin. 4= 0.00 cfs. V= 0.0 cu. ft. T= 2.00 sin. 0= 0.79 cfs. V= 85.5 cu. ft. T= 4.00 sin. 0= 2.80 cfs. V= 300.3 cu. ft. T= 6.00 sin. 0= 5.26 cfs. V= 784.4 cu. ft. T= 3.00 sin. 0= 7.95 cfs. V= 1577.3 cu. ft. T= 10.00 sin. 0= 11.00 cfs. V= 2714.6 cu. ft. T= 12.00 sin. 0= 14.65 cfs. V= 4253.6 cu. ft. T= 14.00 min. 0= 19.03 cfs. V= 6274.4 cu. ft. T= 16.00 sin. 0= 23.95 cfs. V= 8853.4 cu. ft. T= 18.00 sin. 0= 28.66 cfs. V= 12010.0 cu. ft. T= 20.00 Ain. 0= 30.16 cfs. V= 15538.9 cu. ft. T= 22.00 sin. 0= 27.64 cfs. V= 19006.8 cu. ft. T= 24.00 sin. 0= 25.13 cfs. V= 22173.4 cu. ft. T= 26.00 sin. 0= 22.68 cfs. V= 25041.9 cu. ft. T= 28.00 sin. 0= 20.31 cfs. V= 27620.9 cu. ft. T= 30.00 sin. 0= 18.06 cfs. V= 29922.8 cu. ft. T= 32.00 sin. 0= 15.95 cfs. V= 31963.6 cu. ft. T= 34.00 sin. 0= 14.01 cfs. V= 33761.2 cu. ft. T= 36.00 sin. 0= 12.23 cfs. V= 35335.3 cu. ft. T= 38.00 sin. 0= 10.62 cfs. V= 36706.3 cu. ft. T= 40.00 sin. 0= 9.19 cfs. V= 37894.9 cu. ft. T= 42.00 sin. 0= 7.92 cfs. V= 38921.4 cu. ft. T= 44.00 sin. 0= 6.82 cfs. V= 39805.5 cu. ft. T= 46.00 sin. 0= 5.86 cfs. V= 40566.1 cu. ft. T= 48.00 sin. 0= 5.05 cfs. V= 41220.6 cu. ft. T= 50.00 sin. 0= 4.36 cfs. V= 41784.8 cu. ft. T= 52.00 sin. 0= 3.78 cfs. V= 42273.2 cu. ft. T= 54.00 sin. 0= 3.30 cfs. V= 42698.4 cu. ft. T= 56.00 sin. 0= 2.91 cfs. V= 43071.4 cu. ft. T= 58.00 sin. 0= 2.59 cfs. V= 43401.2 cu. ft. T= 60.00 sin. 0= 2.32 cfs. V= 43695.5 cu. ft. T= 62.00 sin. 0= 2.09 cfs. V= 43960.2 cu. ft. T= 64.00 sin. 0= 1.90 cfs. V= 44199.9 cu. ft. T= 66.00 sin. 0= 1.73 cfs. V= 44417.8 cu. ft. T= 68.00 sin. 0= 1.58 cfs. V= 44616.2 cu. ft. T= 70.00 sin. 0= 1.43 cfs. V= 44796.4 cu. ft. T= 72.00 gin. 0= 1.28 cfs. V= 44958.8 cu. ft. T= 74.00 sin. 0= 1.13 cfs. V= 45103.8 cu. ft. T= 76.00 sin. 0= 0.99 cfs. V= 45231.0 cu. ft. T= 78.00 sin. 0= 0.84 cfs. V= 45340.5 cu. ft. T= 80.00 sin. 0= 0.69 cfs. V= 45432.3 cu. ft. INFLOW HY PH NE?!BER 1 2 WOODBURNE RETENTION/DETENTION BASIN 165' WEIR 0.00 0.79 2.80 5.26 7.95 11.00 14.65 19.03 23.95 28.66 30.16 27.64 25.13 22.68 20.31 18.06 15.95 14.01 12.23 10.62 9.19 7.92 6.82 5.86 5.05 4.36 3.78 3.30 2.91 2.59 2.32 2.09 1.90 1.73 1.58 1.43 1.28 1.13 0.99 0.84 0.69 ROUTE RESERVOIR 2 WOODBURNE RETENTION/DETENTION BASIN 165' WEIR T I 0 V N (hrs) (cfs) (cfs) (cf) (ft) 0.000 0.000 0.00 3540.00 2798.000 0.033 0.788 0.00 3587.23 2798.005 0.067 2.800 0.00 3802.26 2798.025 0.100 5.261 0.00 4285.44 2798.071 0.133 7.954 0.00 5077.54 2798.146 0.167 11.002 0.00 6213.71 2798.255 0.200 14.648 0.00 7751.17 2798.401 0.233 19.031 0.00 9769.91 2798.593 0.266 23.952 0.00 12346.33 2798.838 0.300 28.658 0.00 15499.79 2799.138 0.333 30.156 0.00 19025.10 2799.473 0.366 27.643 0.00 22489.58 2799.803 0.400 25.134 0.00 25653.02 2800.104 0.433 22.675 0.00 28518.66 2800.376 0.466 20.307 0.00 31095.00 2800.621 0.500 18.059 0.00 33394.63 2800.840 0.533 15.954 0.00 35433.35 2801.034 0.566 14.007 0.00 37229.19 2801.205 0.599 12.228 0.00 38801.73 2801.354 0.633 10.622 0.00 40171.35 2801.485 0.666 9.187 0.00 41358.69 2801.598 0.699 7.921 0.00 42384.14 2801.695 0.733 6.815 0.00 43267.41 2801.779 0.766 5.861 0.00 44027.22 2801.851 0.799 5.046 0.00 44680.98 2801.913 0.832 4.358 0.00 45244.65 2801.967 0.866 3.782 1.45 45645.49 2802.003 0.899 3.305 4.04 45740.85 2802.008 0.932 2.911 2.88 45698.19 2802.006 0.966 2.587 2.72 45692.00 2802.006 0.999 2.318 2.39 45679.96 2802.005 1.032 2.094 2.16 45671.60 2802.005 1.066 1.901 1.96 45664.09 2802.004 1.099 1.731 1.78 45657.62 2802.004 1.132 1.575 1.62 45651.73 2802.004 1.166 1.427 1.47 45646.20 2802.003 1.199 1.281 1.33 45640.80 2802.003 1.232 1.135 1.18 45635.43 2802.003 1.265 0.987 1.03 45630.00 2802.002 1.299 0.838 0.88 45624.54 2802.002 • FLOOD LUTING JOB NAME: WOODBURNE AVE EVENT: 100 WLB JOB #: 194009A0010040 BASIN: WOODBURNE RETENTION/➢ETENTION BASIN OUTLET WORKS: 165' WEIR BY: SWH TOTAL NUMBER OF MEMBERS: 1 NUMBER OF HEADWAY MEMBERS: 1 NUMBER OF RESERVOIRS: 1 NUMBER OF TIME PERIODS: 40 TIME STEP (HRS): .0333 STAGE DISCHARGE STORAGE (ft.) (cfs) (cu.ft.) 2798 0 3540 2802 .0001 45592 2803 483.45 63391 2804 1367 90776 • PIMA COUNTY HYDROORAPH WASH/SITE• PARCEL 6 AT. RETURN PERIOD• 100 DATE. 121494 BY• SWH PEAK Q = 103 CFS. Tc = 8.399999 min. TL = 16.18 sin. &T = 2 sin. T= 0.00 min. g= 0.00 cfs. V= 0.0 cu. ft. T= 2.00 sin. 0= 3.75 cfs. V= 234.3 cu. ft. T= 4.00 min. 0= 12.48 cfs. V= 1207.8 cu. ft. T= 6.00 sin. 0= 22.76 cfs. V= 3322.3 cu. ft. T= 8.00 sin. 0= 34.42 cfs. V= 6753.3 cu. ft. T= 10.00 sin. Q= 48.71 cfs. V= 11741.2 cu. ft. T= 12.00 sin. Q= 66.47 cfs. V= 18651.8 cu. ft. T= 14.00 sin. 0= 86.21 cfs. V= 27812.5 cu. ft. T= 16.00 sin. 0=102.30 cfs. V= 39123.4 cu. ft. T= 18.00 sin. 0= 93.48 cfs. V= 50870.3 cu. ft. T= 20.00 min. Q= 83.46 cfs. V= 61486.3 cu. ft. T= 22.00 sin. Q= 73.69 cfs. • V= 70914.9 cu. ft. T= 24.00 min. Q= 64.38 cfs. V= 79198.6 cu. ft. T= 26.00 min. Q= 55.69 cfs. V= 86402.6 cu. ft. T= 28.00 sin. Q= 47.74 cfs. V= 92608.2 cu. ft. T= 30.00 min. Q= 40.58 cfs. V= 97907.1 cu. ft. T= 32.00 min. Q= 34.25 cfs. V= 102396.5 cu. ft. T= 34.00 min. Q= 28.73 cfs. V= 106175.2 cu. ft. T= 36.00 min. g= 24.01 cfs. V= 109339.9 cu. ft. T= 38.00 min. 0= 20.03 cfs. V= 111982.7 cu. ft. T= 40.00 min. Q= 16.74 cfs. V= 114188.9 cu. ft. T= 42.00 sin. Q= 14.04 cfs. V= 116035.7 cu. ft. T= 44.00 min. Q= 11.87 cfs. V= 117590.7 cu. ft. T= 46.00 min. Q= 10.15 cfs. V= 118911.9 cu. ft. T= 48.00 min. 0= 8.78 cfs. V= 120047.4 cu. ft. T= 50.00 sin. Q= 7.69 cfs. V= 121035.5 cu. ft. T= 52.00 min. Q= 6.81 cfs. V= 121905.6 cu. ft. T= 54.00 sin. 0= 6.07 cfs. V= 122678.7 cu. ft. T= 56.00 sin. Q= 5.43 cfs. V= 123368.9 cu. ft. T= 58.00 sin. 0= 4.83 cfs. V= 123984.4 cu. ft. T= 60.00 min. 0= 4.25 cfs. V= 124529.0 cu. ft. T= 62.00 sin. 0= 3.66 cfs. V= 125003.6 cu. ft. T= 64.00 sin. 0= 3.07 cfs. V= 125407.7 cu. ft. T= 66.00 sin. Q= 2.48 cfs. V= 125740.9 cu. ft. T= 68.00 min. Q= 1.91 cfs. V= 126004.4 cu. ft. T= 70.00 min. O. 1.38 cfs. V= 126202.0 cu. ft. T= 72.00 min. Q= 0.94 cfs. V= 126341.8 cu. ft. T= 74.00 min. 0= 0.64 cfs. V= 126436.8 cu. ft. INFLOW HYC PH MEMBER 1 100 WOODBURNE RETENTION/DETENTION BASIN 165' WEIR 0.00 3.75 12.48 22.76 34.42 48.71 66.47 86.21 102.30 93.48 83.46 73.69 64.38 55.69 47.74 40.58 34.25 28.73 24.01 20.03 16.74 14.04 11.87 10.15 8.78 7.69 6.81 6.07 5.43 4.83 4.25 3.66 3.07 2.48 1.91 1.38 0.94 0.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 ROUTE RESERVOIR 100 WOODBURNE RETENTION/DETENTION BASIN 165' WEIR T I 0 V H (hrs) (cfs) (cfs) (cf) (ft) 0.000 0.000 0.00 3540.00 2798.000 0.033 3.746 0.00 3764.54 2798.021 0.067 12.479 0.00 4737.09 2798.114 0.100 22.763 0.00 6849.52 2798.315 0.133 34.420 0.00 10277.08 2798.641 0.167 48.711 0.00 15259.96 2799.115 0.200 66.466 0.00 22163.66 2799.772 0.233 86.212 0.00 31315.15 2800.642 0.266 102.304 0.00 42614.80 2801.717 0.300 93.476 90.51 48924.44 2802.187 0.333 83.458 87.98 48831.05 2802.182 0.366 73.686 76.32 48401.99 2802.158 0.400 64.376 67.29 48069.32 2802.139 0.433 55.690 58.30 47738.39 2802.121 0.466 47.736 50.14 47437.95 2802.104 0.500 40.578 42.73 47165.09 2802.089 0.533 34.245 36.14 46922.60 2802.075 0.566 28.733 30.38 46710.39 2802.063 0.599 24.012 25.42 46527.71 2802.053 0.633 20.035 21.21 46372.98 2802.044 0.666 16.736 17.71 46244.01 2802.037 0.699 14.043 14.84 46138.17 2802.031 0.733 11.874 12.51 46052.58 2802.026 0.766 10.147 10.65 45984.17 2802.022 0.799 8.778 9.18 45929.91 2802.019 0.832 7.690 8.01 45886.85 2802.017 0.866 6.811 7.07 45852.26 2802.015 0.899 6.075 6.29 45823.68 2802.013 0.932 5.429 5.62 45799.00 2802.012 0.966 4.830 5.01 45776.51 2802.010 0.999 4.247 4.43 45754.92 2802.009 1.032 3.663 3.84 45733.47 2802.008 1.066 3.072 3.25 45711.80 2802.007 1.099 2.481 2.66 45690.03 2802.006 1.132 1.910 2.08 45668.71 2802.005 1.166 1.385 1.54 45648.80 2802.003 1.199 0.945 1.07 45631.5E 2802.002 1.232 0.637 0.72 45618.63 2802.002 1.265 0.000 0.22 45600.17 2802.001 1.299 0.000 0.00 45586.86 2802.000 . i \ ',, `. '• ''- •N,\ . -• . \ '• '• ----,_ Ii ., ,. , • 04 , , , , ,IT `11 ate° c-Ij. I' \ OpPal �r� I • ; • 1-fili 64' a 281 . / 111/4 I _I . . • . .. .. .... . , ... RET. Wks (-J., — l • - •,%. 4mmir i . i ) 1 ' • b( a . y'IZFSSED CURB by Al ‘ 10 . _ • �: ,� Ail ■" ° 0'. I ■ Ht►r . 7 1 ' \ N C i ' , ‘: I . Ai 1 ;if `, 1 • . `7 I 0 tqL t e 1 ' . \ \ .. . o 8, 4' . I' .. 1 . _ . . '''''' ' oi° ',. /• ' .._ I \ t, 41 `' • ....\:•, ... . .. . _ .. , .\ . , ) t, ,\ 003 . ,, + . \ • r,0161�c 4.1fililli ..\.' \,6, , , • • \ 1 I ) 41 4I", //X. '.•0•.•4 G,°� 1 1 ,. •t• 0 . \/ I v4. J. li : : , ; ) ' , / , • , .... .... . iP'-ii in _ ,' A iti. .0 , j, ,' , -----"„. -,"V — Via . 0 P . ' \* 1.a ' \ t • • l / . _ N I I I\‘.141%. * 1113 - ‘• ,,' • • , ca%--,-..., L.:../ei ... \ , 1 ' . 4P1-tel.- -1- • , IYO1?1 \R jive' v • rzi...<=)____\/<\> . . - .‘ -, . ‘ . . . , , . , • 13 111 \. '/r . i ' e. • 18 t i /: /'.. If1 ) \ •, / i ) 0 I 1. . . \ yllilk ! fahh I ) • a I . . ; \, 111 Ili 4 . l; ., i •. . •ssimi: y.. , 1 !mili.....• r)II : I it I Ili ' i / 41 / / 1 '1 f it r . . ; 44:14*11( ( . *..°'`.. et. ..‘ ,,.. Z8I6 . .4/ oio :1 , ) ittzttfts-. : .:: , I. •I. • \'- , , ti . \ tie k..'Atte.,. ..;, a (3' t . ..e. i l' \ „v 4 ol .. • . • • .,„. RETE°11"n• • ( \`, . r - . ,y ,, (111 TYP. % �. . 4 .....\:-. 7) \ "\ 1) , ' \ (Ili Tiiii\ . . • 1 \ . . ., :..A);kits.:::::. * / s.liV' •P'1' I VP • -Ae-• 1 0 — , '. 9 • 8 „k ,_'9 1 ri . ,.. • •4dpr Akok .1 \ 'I II •':i • /OW . , t •',', �� r 1/ , \ ,'. • • -- ( %,11111111111%, ......______saiiagi„,i,o'lx.. ' 4. , • , . i 1,) t , . t ok) t \,•..,...._ awilizommlowir NW , : , 780 .0 !P.*. l''%..‘`10.-11111111411111111r:-.11114104 a 4i'...,r1i:"‘..11. ;":::'fi'.101:.:r..'611;r4':v1;1;:i1117#4.'e,.9-..... 1, .v . . . . '7.,A1 t\ • ii . .--/-1.. .‘4. . ., .[N,....,s:� , /-co . • 44' - A to N*6 ..1,1 • . ,./ ,,,,.,,,---v-\•`"jA d' . N SPACE . ' . .,. . •goo \ .,, . -.. , , . . . c . \ 1.1 \4 till, NZ1111 .0011061' * . z0 mado..a '6; — . 1 ._ _..........•• . --t•-,..,4 . r I 1> 0).-- •41 . • RANCH 0o LEGe-ND • FARCE ',, : ...------._ WATcRSNED 6OUNDAP . . -- __- ._ --_ . FLOW DIREGTIO tA . (ID GONGEN—•rcz.ATION POINT • AIN LIMIT 1c too YEAcL Fl_OODPt_ v 0 20' 40' • • s 80� 120• O {-IEG-2 GR055 SECTION `' .‘1111, G ION • ,:o';,000,r,,,eN SANK PROTE T 100 YEAR P61,10IrlG LIMIT-;; Enpin••rinp Planning Surv•yin Landacap• Archil.ctur• • Urban 0•tiV. l/MB plllc•a local•d ,n fucton. Pno•n, Lat V•p.t. and Vlclor Vali•y. C CONTOUR INTERVAL 1' gieB our • ORO VALLEY PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: December 21, 1994 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL FROM: Linda Frew, Planner I SUBJECT: OV 12-94-21 Rancho Vistoso, Neighborhood 7, Neighborhood Recreation Center (in Parcel G) SUMMARY: In accordance with the adopted master plan for Rancho Vistoso, a portion of Parcel G, Neighborhood 7, has been set aside as a recreational facility to serve the present and future residents of that neighborhood. The project engineers, WLB, on behalf of the property owner, Rancho Vistoso Partners, have presented a landscape/development plan for a 5.4 acre parcel of land, which is located on the east side of the Woodburne Ave. alignment, west of New World's future project in Parcel G. The neighborhood recreation plan in Parcel G was reviewed by Staff, and by the DRB on several occasions, and it has been revised at least four times, based on concerns expressed. The recreational facility, as now proposed, features a baseball field, a 20 space parking lot, sand volleyball court, a basketball half-court, sand tot lot, restrooms, four picnic areas, a pedestrian trail and open space. On November 8, 1994, the DRB reviewed and recommended approval to Council of a revised plan dated October 12, 1994, as submitted, with one added condition relating to security/night lighting. Per the DRB's request, lighting standards, 30 feet in height, have been provided in the parking lot and adjacent to the sand volleyball court. Subsequent to the November 8th DRB meeting, the project engineer made further revisions, minor in Staff's opinion, in response to Staff concerns. These changes included relocation of the volleyball and basketball courts out of the area where drainage was an issue and elimination of one picnic node. It should be noted that the Parks Advisory Board also reviewed the same plan the DRB approved and voiced no objection to it, as submitted. Engineering Staff is satisfied with the December 8th recreation plan resubmittal, but requests that a revised drainage report be filed with the improvement plans for this project. Planning Staff questions the need for such a tall lighting standard in the parking lot area, as we have been informed by the Building Official that a 20 foot standard would suffice and would be preferable, since the parking lot abuts residential lots. We suggest that the parking lot standard be 20 feet in height and that all light fixtures be fully shielded in accordance with Article 6-7 of the Oro Valley Outdoor Lighting Code. Secondly, Staff has concerns regarding plant salvage on this site. The Town's Zoning Inspector, Mr. Manny Padilla, visited the site and identified approximately five trees which he feels are significant. Staff requests that the project landscape architect meet with Mr. Padilla to discuss the fate of these trees and, if required by the Planning and Zoning Director, they be saved in place or transplanted. Further, Planning Staff requests that the open space at the eastern border of this site be protected with temporary fencing during the grading operation. RECOMMENDATION: Finding that the recreational area for Parcel G, and the proposed amenities therefor, meet the intent of the adopted Rancho Vistoso PAD and the Town's requirement for the provision of recreational areas, Planning and Engineering Staffs recommend approval of the revised plan dated December 8, 1994, with the Staff conditions listed on Exhibit "A" attached herewith. SUGGESTED MOTION: The Council may wish to consider one of the following motions: I move to approve OV 12-94-21, Rancho Vistoso, Neighborhood 7, Recreation Area Plan (Parcel G) dated December 8, 1994, as forwarded by the DRB, with the Staff conditions listed in the attached Exhibit "A" OR I move to approve OV 12-94-21, Rancho Vistoso, Neighborhood 7, Recreation Area Plan (Parcel G) dated December 8, 1994, as forwarded by the DRB, with the Staff conditions in Exhibit "A" and the following added conditions: OR I move to deny OV12-94-21, Rancho Vistoso, Neighborhood 7, Recreation Area Plan (Parcel G), finding that: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Exhibit "A" - List of Conditions 4. Reductions of recreation area plan Department Head 12-94-21\rec2.tcc Town Manager • EXHIBIT "A" CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL OF OV12-94-21 RANCHO VISTOSO, NEIGHBORHOOD 7, PARCEL G NEIGHBORHOOD RECREATION AREA PLAN 1. The parking lot lighting standard(s) shall be a maximum of 20 feet in height. 2. All lighting fixtures shall be fully shielded, and in conformance to the Oro Valley Outdoor Lighting Code, Article 6-7 of the Oro Valley Town Code. 3. The open space area along the eastern border of the site shall be fenced off and protected prior to commencement of the grading operation for this project. 4. The project landscape architect shall meet with the Town's Zoning Inspector to discuss the fate of those trees identified by the Inspector as significant specimens. A decision as to whether these trees will be retained in place or salvaged shall be made by the Planning and Zoning Director. 5. A revised drainage plan, to be approved by the Town Engineer, shall be submitted with the improvement plans for this project. MINUTES ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION DECEMBER 21, 1994 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11,000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE CALL TO ORDER - 7:02 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Mayor Richard Parker Councilmember Valerie Hoyt - Arrived 7:10 p.m. Councilmember Bill Kautenburger Councilmember Cheryl Skalsky Councilmember Marty Wells ITEM 1 - CONSENT AGENDA Councilmember Skalsky MOVED to APPROVE the Consent Agenda. Councilmember Kautenburger SECONDED the motion which CARRIED 4-0. A. Minutes - November 2, December 5 & 7, 1994 B. Building Codes Department Activity Report - November 1994 C. Request for Approval of Modification of Naranja Road Improvement District by assessing Part of Assessment 5 into 573-676 (Lots 1-74 Carmel Point (Parcel H) D. Approval of Substitute Assurance Agreement for Horizon Heights Condominiums Units 131-166 and 171 & 172 E. Approval of the addition of one Officer to the Police Department F. Resolution No. (R)94-58 - Acceptance of Streets within Lambert Lane Subdivision G. Police Report - November 1994 H. Request for Approval to Purchase Furniture for New Police Facility I. Acceptance of resignation from Bill Kautenburger as Council Liaison to the Development Review Board Mayor Parker requested that Item 5 be considered next. ITEM 5 - RESOLUTION NO. (R)94-59 ACCEPTANCE BY THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY FOR THE TRANSFER OF DENNIS WEAVER PARK Town Manager Chuck Sweet reviewed the Council Communication, explaining that the Pima County Board of Supervisors had by a unanimous vote agreed in principle to provide $200,000 and enter into an Inter-Governmental Agreement (IGA) toward the transfer of Dennis Weaver Park to the Town of Oro Valley. He said there would be a $50,000 payment this year (1994) and $150,000 payment in July, 1995. He said the Council is being asked to pass this resolution, 12/21/94 Minutes, Town Council Regular Meeting 13 listed in Exhibit "A" and staff conditions listed above. Councilmember Hoyt SECONDED the motion which CARRIED 4-0. ITEM 14-0V12-93-12 CANADA HILLS,PARCEL K,LOTS 1-22, Common AreaS A AND B, FINAL PLAT - Property located in the El Conquistador Planned Area Development, south of Canada Hills Drive and west of La Canada Drive Planning and Zoning Director Don Chatfield reviewed the Council Communication, stating that all conditions of the preliminary plat had been met and that on December 13, 1994, the Development Review Board recommended approval of the final plat. He added that Staff recommended approval of the final plat as submitted. There were no questions of staff, so Mayor Parker invited the petitioner to speak. Warren Thompson of Cella Barr Associates, representing Canada Hills Development, stated that they were in agreement with the conditions. Vice Mayor Skalsky MOVED to APPROVE OV12-93-12, Canada Hills Parcel K, Lots 1-22 Common Areas A and B, final plat, as submitted. Councilmember Hoyt SECONDED the motion which CARRIED 5-0. ITEM 15 - OV 12-94-21 RANCHO VISTOSO, NEIGHBORHOOD 7, NEIGHBORHOOD RECREATION CENTER(IN PARCEL G) Property located on the east side of Woodburne Avenue alignment, west of New World future project in Parcel G Planning and Zoning Director Don Chatfield reviewed the Council Communication, explaining that the plan for the 5.4 recreation area in Parcel G, after at least four revisions, had been recommended for approval by the DRB and also had been reviewed by the Parks Advisory Board. Mr. Chatfield stated that Planning and Engineering staffs recommended approval of the revised plan dated December 8, 1994, with the following conditions listed as Exhibit "A." 1. The parking lot lighting standard(s) shall be a maximum of 20 feet in height. 2. All lighting fixtures shall be fully shielded, and in conformance to the Oro Valley Outdoor Lighting Code, Article 6-7 of the Oro Valley Town Code. 3. The open space area along the eastern border of the site shall be fenced off and protected prior to commencement of the grading operation for this project. 4. The project landscape architect shall meet with the Town's Zoning Inspector to discuss the fate of those trees identified by the Inspector as significant specimens. A decision as to whether these trees will be retained in place or salvaged shall be made by the Planning and Zoning Director. 12/21/94 Minutes, Town Council Regular Meeting 14 5. A revised drainage plan, to be approved by the Town Engineer, shall be submitted with the improvement plans for this project. There being no questions of staff, Mayor Parker invited the petitioner to speak. Dick Maes of Rancho Vistoso Partners, stated that they were in agreement with staff conditions. Councilmember Hoyt MOVED to APPROVE OV 12-94-21, Rancho Vistoso, Neighborhood 7, Recreation Area Plan (Parcel G), dated December 8, 1994, as forwarded by the DRB, with the Staff conditions listed above. Councilmember Kautenburger SECONDED the motion. Mr. Chatfield clarified for the record that the recreation area is to be completed by the time 40% of the building permits are issued. Mayor Parker called for a vote and the motion CARRIED 5-0. ITEM 16- OV12-94-26 RANCHO DE ORO, LOTS 1-119,LANDSCAPE SALVAGE PLAN (Property located 1/4 mile east of La Canada Drive, on the north side of, and abutting, Tangerine Road) CONTINUED FROM 12/5/94 Planning and Zoning Director Don Chatfield reviewed the Council Communication, stating that the revised landscape salvage plan provides an additional 15 plants that are to be salvaged or protected in place. The previous submittal inventoried 70 native plants, of which 12 will be protected in place and 58 will be salvaged, based on plant accessibility , size, health, soil conditions and structure. Mr. Chatfield said that with the revised salvage plan, all the DRB and Staff conditions have been met. He said that staff finds that this project meets the intent of applicable Town regulations, and recommends approval. There being no questions of staff, Mayor Parker invited the petitioner to speak. Rick Schoenfeld, landscape architect with Cella Barr Associates, stated that they were in agreement with all conditions. Councilmember Hoyt MOVED to APPROVE OV12-94-26, Rancho De Oro Landscape Salvage Plan, as revised, resubmitted by the applicant and forwarded by the Planning and Zoning Department. Councilmember Kautenburger SECONDED the motion which CARRIED 5-0. ITEM 17 - OV12-94-26 RANCHO DE ORO, LOTS 1-119 RECREATION PLAN(Property located 1/4 mile east of La Canada Drive, on the north side of, and abutting, Tangerine Road) CONTINUED FROM 12/5/94 Planning and Zoning Director Don Chatfield explained that this item had been continued at the December 7, 1994 Town Council meeting to examine alternatives for the development of the DU !Z-`74-ZI 4 Ivil 6 21 ,53,4 �,�11 7s".>, m roue r -' D �, Inc cb I. N Engineering • Planning • Surveying • Urban Design • Landscape Archit 64ure JUL 1995 O Offices located in Tucson, Phoenix, Las Vegas, and Victor Valley, Cali rnia RECEIVED 1 4444 East Broadway • Tucson, Arizona 85711 • (602) 881-7480 • FAX (602) 88 492TOWN OF ORO VALLEY k PUBLIC WORKS Transmittal ! DEPARTMENT °£szva To: ,]panne Hummer Date: July,14 1995 Oro Valley Town Hall Job No.: 194009-A-001-0200 11000 N_ La Canada Drive Drawing/Spec Reference: Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 Re: Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 7- Parcel G Rec. Area We Transmit ❑Herewith ❑Under Separate Cover C Via errands Material Format Requested Action ❑ Letter ❑ Shop Drawing ❑ For Your Approval ❑ Your Review ❑ Memo ❑ Clarification Drawing ❑ For Your Signature ❑ Please Comment ❑ Prints ❑ Modification Drawing ® Information ❑ Make Recommendation ❑ Sketch ❑ Specifications ❑ Resubmit ❑ Issue Construction Order ❑ Reports ❑ Sepias ❑ As Requested ❑ For Your Use ❑ Mylars N prints ❑ Issue Change Order ❑ Remarks: Joanne Here is a set of the prints as they were resubmitted on Dec. 9, 1994 (see copy of transmittal enclosed.) If there is anything else we can help you with, do not hesitate to call Thank you Copies To: Dave McKinney Signed: Kevin McEl heny Mike Ives RECEIVED File JUL 1 41995 Received By: Date: Town of Oro Valley TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE 10. 4 ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA 85737 Administrative Offices(520)297-2591 Fax(520)297-0428 A .. r � .A * .. D POUNDEO�°'1 July 18 , 1995 Kevin McElheny The WLB Group 4444 East Broadway Tucson, AZ 8571], SUBJECT: RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 7, PARCEL G RECREATION AREA IMPROVEMENT PLAN 0V12-94-21 Dear Mr. McElheny: In response to your transmittal to Joanne Homer, Town Engineer, dated July 14 , 1995, the following information is being provided to assist you in preparing the improvement plans for the above mentioned recreation area project : 1 . A complete set of improvement plans shall include the following: a. Cover Sheet . b. Detail Sheet that includes any details pertaining to the entrance, paved parking area, grading, storm drain and detention. c . Paving and Grading Notes . d. General Notes . e . Grading and Paving Plan that addresses the surface improvements mentioned above . f . Recreation Site Improvements, Landscaping/Salvage, Irrigation and corresponding details shall be provided and identified "FOR INFORMATION ONLY" . These items shall be referenced within the grading plan "to be provided per the approved RECREATION AREA LANDSCAPE/DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 7, PARCEL G. " I have attached a copy of the current Improvement Plan Checklist for your use in preparing this plan. Those items that pertain only to subdivision development may be considered not applicable . I have also attached copies of the current paving and grading notes . They may be combined by utilizing the Paving Notes and adding Note No. 3 from the Grading Notes . RV N7, Parcel G Recreation Area Improvement Plan July 18 , 1995 Page Two The Town Council approval of the Recreation Area Landscape/Development Plan attached conditions that are to be addressed prior to the development of this project . I have attached a copy of the conditions that were approved by the Town Council on December 21, 1994 . Item No. 5 has been addressed by a drainage addendum provided to Joanne Homer on December 21, 1994 . Item No. 3 shall be noted on the Improvement Plan. All other items shall be addressed in a timely manner so as not to impede the progress of the Improvement Plans through the review process . If you have any questions regarding the preparation of the plans, please call me at 797-9797 . Sincerely, Susan B . Russell C.E . Technician Public Works Department f : \ . . . \12-94-21\raimp.pwd JUL-20-95 THU 10:41 THE WLB GROUP FAX NO. 8817492 P. 01 ov (2_ 4-2-1 gla3 Group FAX TRANSMITTAL SHEET DATE: WLB # July 20, 1995 194009-A-001-0200 TO: FROM: Joanne Homer _ Kevin J. McElheny FAX #: WLB FAX ## (520) 881-7492 297-0428 coMMENTS:Joanne I have had difficulty reaching you by phone the past three days to verify that you had received the set of prints for R.V. Neighborhood 7, Parcel G Recreation area delivered by messenger on July 14, 1995 p.m, delivery. This set of improvement plans (as originally submitted on 12-9-94 - see attached transmittal dated 12-9-94) includes a grading plan (sheet 3 of 9) . It was our understanding that the drawings submitted on 12-9-94 were in accordance with the staff review comments. We wish to have the plans approved ASAP.Please call me at your earliest opportunity to this regard. CC:Dick Maes (via fax) Bill Walker • TOWN OF ORO VALLEY APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROJECT AROiITEC'IURE REVIEW November 20, 1995 DATE: CV CASE NO. : OV12-94-21 (Rec. Area) (office use only) PROJE �,: RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 7 • Parcel G, Recreation Area SUBDIVISION/NO. OF LOTS: NUMBER OF MODELS/ELEVATIONS: One restroom, one ramada APPLICANT: Rancho Vistoso Partners 5861 S. Kyrene Rd. , Suite 1, 2, & 3, Tempe, AZ 85283 ADDRESS: -- TELEPHONE TELEPHONE M. : (602) 831-2000 • PRO - • "PROPERTY �: Rancho Vistoso Partners 5861 S. Kyrene Rd. Suite 1, 2, & 3 Tempe,AZ IC -. : (602) 831-2000 ADDRESS: 85283 PROJECT ARCIiITECT/ENMIEER: Dwayne Lewis Architects, Inc. 3040 N. 44th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85018 ADDRESS: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD HEARING DATE: . 1/9/9 5 SIGNATURE: DATE: the $150.00 fee and twelve NOTE: This application shall be accompanied �' dimensioned elevations of - copies of the plans, 11" x 17" in size, each to include all models f.LuLL all four sides, front views only of alternative elevations, if any, applicants must have on hand floor plans and a typical site plan. AT THE MEETING, ... presentation, colored perspective or rendered elevations of all fo sides of onenr pres must depict the exact type oflandscaping typi�a� model-• This rendering proposed for the project. Samples of paint and trim colors, roof and detail tiles the same cc�any are also requested, --- ..and photographs of similar products built by if possible. suBmrrrAls MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE PLANNING DEpARDIENT AT LEAST 15 CALENDAR DAYS IN - ADVANCE OF THE DESIRED_DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD HEARING DATE. .* Mr. Mike L. Ives of WLB shall be at the ORO VALLEY TOWN HALL this afternoon to sign for the required S150. 00 fee from the RANCHO VISTOSO PARTNERS account. November 7, 1995 Richard Maes Vistoso Partners 5861 S. Kyrene Rd., Suite 1 Tempe, AZ 85283 Subject: Re-seeding Bonds Dear Mr. Maes: According to our records, Vistoso Partners has assigned to the Town of Oro Valley a $300,000 time deposit at National Bank of Arizona to guarantee completion of reseeding of Neighborhood 10, 11, & 13 driving range and golf course. Our Zoning Inspector reported that there are still some areas which have not been completed. As you requested, we will retain the $300,000 CD and specify that the amount required to guarantee the completion of the restoration of the golf course entry road, temporary club house area, and entry feature at Rancho Vistoso Blvd. and Tangerine Road be included in that amount. If you have any questions regarding this, please contact me at (520)-797-7979. Sincerely, Mary Jo Peterson Assurances Coordinator APPROVED: Richard Maes, Vistoso Partners James Riley, Engineer, Town of Oro Valley 24, a a '\01/4' N4k)ff eK; ..m........ ..1...---- _- Official cAttiltesz (4°-A-e-- 1:111'.'t, tali --i -:t.'443--: e../ D CITY COUNTY PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA ( PLANNING &DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ADDRESS ISSUING AGENCY ,..mT.. AN• qk ASSIGNED ADDRESS; jaiga,WZ NA 1 \p,.._1 ace-A II itrir-N E_ A , ) (?,, , ___ DEB. LEGAL: BK. , PG. . BLK. LOT (73 DEV. PLAN BK. PG. SUBDIVISION NAME: SEC. 3c2___ TWNS. ___1 RNG. ,-, TAX CODE: _ D . __......., PG. _........ ESCROW ZONING MAP NO.c-',DL4) NAME OF BUSINESS: COMMENTS: (731 .-a-Cil-i-a‘ g•No),\.(A)0 0% SAOS0_, f\c;• i + . i ., Pipki cs_k G 1 co ,opyr. v•j• ....._ NOTE: Assignment of an address does not assure zoning approval or issuance of a permit ISSUED TO: - . DATE: 1 A 1 qt— ,n, NI Tr)r\IF TI IrCrINI A7 0c7n1 rai inn ir 74 rY r,6i71.6"-•. ---,, l -d E178186L_ S3OIAH3S IN3ld013A30 14E1A VIVES' ll 966l-S0-1 TM `- D ,� �4 - �I 6i 8 910117? BIZ °1 y it? roue _f 9 inc o°` _.' , f,17l, j Engineering • Planning • Surveying • Urban Design • Landscape Archi g{cture , , Q1 Offices located in Tucson, Phoenix, Las Vegas, and Victor Valley, C I onnra, •.;'-.^��';,-, v 4444 East Broadway • Tucson, Arizona 85711 • (602) 881-7480 • FAX (602) 8 7'921r-,; 63 Transmittal v,, To: Jim Hoscley Date: December 11 , 1995 Town of Oro Valley Job No.:_94co A-001-0-200 11000 N_ La Canada Drive Drawing/Spec Reference: Oro Valley, AZ 85737 - Re: Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 7, Parcel G Recreation Area We Transmit CI Herewith ❑Under Separate Cover OVia Material Format Requested Action ❑ Letter ❑ Shop Drawing ❑ For Your Approval ❑ Your Review ❑ Memo ❑ Clarification Drawing ❑ For Your Signature ❑ Please Comment ❑ Prints ❑ Modification Drawing ❑ Information ❑ Make Recommendation ❑ Sketch ❑ Specifications ❑ Resubmit ❑ Issue Construction Order ❑ Reports ❑ Sepias ❑ As Requested ❑ For Your Use ❑ Mylars ❑ ❑ Issue Change Order ❑ Remarks: Please find one (1) full set of Landscape/Development Plans (approved) for the above mentioned recreation area, as well as the utility plan showing the connections for water, electric and sewer. Also find one (1) set of the Grading Plans that were submitted after the Development Plans. This may be what you are missing. Please let me know if you require any additional information in order to approve the Utility Connections. Copies To: flick Maps Signed: KPvi n McFI heny Mike Ives File 2/4/ Received By: itt:7--- Date: , ITEM ORO VALLEY PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING DATE: December 12, 1995 TO: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD FROM: Jim Copus, Planner I SUBJECT: OV 12-94-21 RANCHO VISTOSO PARTNERS REQUEST FOR ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL OF RAMADA AND RESTROOM, NEIGHBORHOOD 7, PARCEL G, RECREATION CENTER ARCHITECTURE BACKGROUND: The DRB, at it's November 1994 meeting approved the Recreation Area Landscape and Development Plan for Rancho Vistoso, Neighborhood 7, Parcel G. The approved facilities include a baseball field, 20 space parking lot, sand volleyball court, basketball half-court, sand tot lot, rest rooms, five picnic areas, pedestrian trail and open space. All elements of the plan were proposed and are located to minimize or avoid disturbance of existing trees and vegetation. This 5.4 acre parcel is located at the southeast corner of Arrowsmith Drive and Woodburne Avenue, and is part of the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development, is abutted on the north by Desert Rose subdivision (21 lots approved), on the east by Parcel G (122 lots approved), and to the south and west by Parcel F (vacant, 244 lots planned). The park will serve Neighborhood 7 and portions of Neighborhood 5. This neighborhood has a projected population of approximately 4,600 people. 861 lots have been built or approved to date, yielding a population of approximately 1,908 people. SUMMARY: Rancho Vistoso Partners, the owners, request architectural approval of a ramada and restroom for the Recreation Center located in Neighborhood 7, Parcel G in Rancho Vistoso. The proposed architecture for the ramada and restroom facility can be described as contemporary. The exterior of both facilities will be of natural stone, with colors to match with the existing structures in the surrounding area. Roof treatment is comprised of flat concrete roof tile with a metal fascia. All the elevations contain some architectural details in the form of stone accents in the form of center score C.M.U. and split face C.M.U. blocks. RECOMMENDATION: Planning Staff has no objection to the approval of the architecture for the ramada and restroom facilities, as presented. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to recommend approval of OV12-94-21, the Rancho Vistoso, Neighborhood 7, Parcel G, Recreation Center Ramada and Restroom Architecture. OR I move to recommend approval of OV12-94-21, the Rancho Vistoso, Neighborhood 7, Parcel G, Recreation Center Ramada and Restroom Architecture, subject to the following added conditions: OR I move to recommend denial of OV12-94-21, the Rancho Vistoso,Neighborhood 7, Parcel G, Recreation Center Ramada and Restroom Architecture, finding that Attachments: 1. Location Map. 2. Architecture Elevations and Utility Plan. F:\...\O V 12\1994\12-94-21\A RCHRPT.DRB 2 ORO VALLEY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING MINUTES DECEMBER 12, 1995 CALL TO ORDER: 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Chairman Matthew Moutafis Vice Chairman Walt Wind Bill Adler Dale Fogelstrom Shirley Lee Verlin Smith Richard Underwood (Arrived at 6:05) MINUTES MOTION: Moved, seconded (Adler/Lee) and carried by a 6-0 vote (Underwood absent) to approve the minutes of the November 14th meeting. CONSENT AGENDA: Item C was removed from the consent agenda for discussion at the request of Chairman Moutafis and Bill Adler. A. OV13-95-28 US HOME - MODELS 11 AND 33 FOR CAST- HILLS, PARCELS D AND E B. OV 12-94-21 RANCHO VISTOSO, NEIGH. 7, PARCEL G RECREATION AREA/ ARCHITECTURE FOR RAMADAS AND RESTROOM FACILITIES MOTION: Moved, seconded (Underwood/Lee) and carried by a 7-0 vote to approve Items A & B of the consent agenda. REGULAR AGENDA: C. OV 13-95-55 PULTE HOMES REQUEST FOR PERMANENT SIGN APPROVAL, RANCHO VISTOSO, NEIGH. 5, PARCEL H Kevin Kish presented the staff report. He noted the memo distributed by Linda Frew which stated that the Rancho Vistoso PAD established guidelines for signs. Walt Wind asked why the sign was so large. Ms. Frew answered that entry way signs could be up to 50 feet and this sign met the requirements of the Oro Valley Sign Code. Bill Adler stated that guidelines and standards were used interchangeably in the PAD and he felt the Board should discuss how they were to interpret the two terms. He felt standards were definite and allowed no latitude and suggested this interpretation be used by the Board in reviewing signage. iz S"�� I13 ft T cos-IG• ----- --'.----- ------- '..---ffIF --ri 1-- - j_ t cl 1.1 .--r,.6.1.... r-/ci,,i., II 8x8XiG r T f T >� .M v. - 7 I 1v11'E L L(,/c}2 O � a r — 1 I t w � � I I' �1 � i I - , ' - H ter'—"SABxl P�-tt' 1 . I - _ 1 a rc G.c.fi.U.— 00 1 i I 1 I�iT �. _,1z N 11 1 1 1 1 [ 1 11 i 11 1 1 1 1 1 • ..• _ t 1 I 1 t t l i 1 , i i i 1 i i , ,fit- —+e)_as • - - T - • 1 N I I �.__ f $ 1 1 I , t 1 1 ri�1. --o .6). _ S 11D.E ELEVATION gA�.1-g ki."=E'—oa ri,.,�-r eoLJ c. 12 pT�L r 1.� --2' ___...,_ ... rJx8x1Z ca.01-sf- --- , r + 1.1-r iz i 1_ c01-, t. 1 1 N .. .* • .2,...: L J ç-e(T' 5 . • FLAT CONC. 12 ROOF TILE SLOPE]3 • - _ -- --- METAL FASCIA 1 BRG. . , / td ---T---• 1 I _i_ _., R 8 - -- -- --- - -- - - _ - --- SX8X16 CENTER as _ - --- - - - - - - - _ - I -- -_ .�. - - SCORE C M.U.- - - - --- - - — = - - — —_ ___- --—--— INTEGRAL COLOR 0 _c4 • _ .----- __ - - - ---_ ch- It ---1- 7-- BXSXIC� SPLIT c �- --FACE C.M.U.- - _, .� --- --.- • Z INTEGRAL COLOR " -- `-`-r- - FIN. FLOOR - FIN. GRADE -' - :, F•RONT ELEVATION • • ARCHITECTS,INC REAR ELEVATION SIMILAR SCALE 1/4":1'-O" 3040North 44th Street Phoenix,Arizona 85018 6 0 2 . 3 8 1 . 1 1 7 1 „2,...: 5 12 FLAT CONC. SLOPEl3 ROOF TILE _ - - METAL FASCIA I \ l I �T • o SX8X16. CENTER -.Q--"OPEN TO = I - SCORE-C-.MJJ.- insimi 1 -- BEYOND INTEGRAL COLOR .) 71 91 -I- ~---- 8X8XI6 SPLIT 1 --1 FACE C.M.U.- 1 INTEGRAL COLOR FIN. FLOOR FIN. GRADE Epic” EXTERIOR ELEVATION „so ARCHITECTS,INC ALL SIDES SIMILAR SCALE 1/4":1'-0" 3040 North 44th Street Phoenix,Arizona 85018 602 . 381 . 1171 RANCHO V1STOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 7 PARCEL G RECREATION AREA LANDSCAPE/DEVELOPMENT PLAN \ /I/ it ir * \ II *4 % \ I Ai* /ii \I i (.11.4 /•f• IP. • oPeis"cE 0*** it •\ — • ) 4t\ ‘ vid ... \ id**Tatf.1 �4 Nom , N mt. � '+ate \^ >,_ t, i \ , THIS PROJECT 1 �w • �PL�EY qq/ TOWN OF ORO VALLE' 11000 N. La Canada Drive ev,ti4► Oro Valley, AZ 85737 411WP C Phone: 797-9797 Fax: 297-0428 °UN A9 TRANSMITTAL D ED TO: H 1/1)L1 la Pout P DATE: 1 Z/?ib q 5 CASE NO.: DV/Z- ATTN: KkEEVJ Mon -f AJ y ❑ MESSENGER ICK-UP FROM: 6a l—A/ ❑ MAIL ❑ EXPRESS MAIL ❑ FAX Number of pages including cover PROJECT NAME: <}A1 1//5TPSo dttEyzs,C f{e-er 7 DESCRIPTION: — D- Herewith compliance with your request Under separate cover t/ For your correction and resubmittal Copies eacr' For your review and comment iginals each For your information and files Please return to Town For your approval See remarks below For your action REMARKS: COPY: FI L E 1-1-kpido - 1 3 4 5 • 7 • • '0 L 11 12 s 13 1• 1• o 1.0, 15 01 • , ,r1) lik. \ e —mg : .--\ • _- I 10,11);$00 4660.*44616.\, \ ! I __• � `,,A ill /,.��- 1 THE RANCHO VIET'0110 MASTER HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION 411` 1 i I b �� . -.�. -w? "x"L �`�\ If !X•.N MIALL Amen FOR CONTROL �` 1, 1 �_ i► •> I _ ^ SAFETY AID LIAIE.KY OF THESE FACILITIES- 1 K , 1 I".I ,4 ,•'all. p4 ' 6 O LEGEND t 4 2N04 .9 \ I 1 z U !It r•aes. 1 1 _ 'ram !it-. �� +' . ` OH HANDICAP PARKING SPACE 11 ! '� ! ' 2 iNs01�T. 'V IV 2606.6 I PRE-DEVELOPMENT Y TI Q MP — f- OO YR FL00D PLAIN aoa.c' MEM w•`•`•o I( ' I I �uuu.��� -�. _ \\ .- ` • _ (TYt.t ►LAG TOP SOIL ▪ I! ' (.. o � AREA • .ei c. :t ` POST DEVELOPMENT i i.. i•.•. - .....,. I i ;. I •o UGHT R {zeu..1 `�..._�• - 100 YR FLOOD PR.AIId , I SOFT. �.' '.. •pia= • •I INN 1 ,� ' _ PA M/ '•:•� IMIIOM ENE•.M RYr: mo POLES . \ ' .• ° j�� , f r. ...•.AM.so �ii�. \\ :806.�1^ l 215'.- ----(/ER"' " �••L••E AT • 3 I t, PARK / O t i eo'1.a sac"Jiu►a ACT Y° T• f' NIS I t'ti I 14.'1. ' , ' . , r ---• ., , . : "1I I ' ht SEE ig V ' I , i \ ir If/ RETENTION BASIN BERM 43i I I �,a s` l' 1 PL'CEDWA► LL FIELD\. Me lILAC.ID�-AAt•MRTN avoRD� KT K ,Th .. i I � , :1 I I 1 1 �r- ,.L i r— MOTES: I 1 41O ilp - •/ MET�iT ACRE V /: I I. wEJ AKA El LIMA u{.•ICEt1. • t ' w 1xiHrs N) I I �, o , •// MAX FOND** Y • i. :: ° — {`" "' t �• �. . �raiEE{UMW I so+FT. D,; i o ��� r{EtM{c w EL{TEM•1 u w{.r. i ` ` I �!l L \ / E. MIMINK Tt KIS M/MK It 1.4 Mom{. • i _� G G ° I ~o'' ' ° S. �AElw tlt ME1•lleatT qn,n l{{{.airmail•mar muse 1 411 PEDESTRIAN TRAL {w�iwr.ww{a{{u-{{'d-c. 1 1 , , 1 „• MU o K eirirEr,Wei u AK Km Etsla MMMC: MU sus Mt�aMLL» I• si! RETENT 1- •• BERM PUT M1WT E/MUM T1•.11.MrIM MTELT no FUT WM Er man ut 1\ I• I 1 ( r•• 7� . 1 �� _ ` 1 ♦ • ` TOT Lei 1 3 UMW 11 WM I.fir 11 NUL{w 16{Air. ILIUM Iw./1 1 . =s RiQ `1 �� 4 � , �� W 1. {NIUM{{NCI CROON a WWI TOM Of w MLLN. ET{MUSKS'me \ ��\ , . a'PIT. 46) % I. �. .��., * zao.' P � • MUM.MOUE{II 1EI MK_Ef 1UrKK. c \ 1 1 % \ 5'D.PE t SST �ti..;� .,•T' • .: :l a a. Illumet WELL Km Et Kral.SiSKI II M uJN rtium 1 Ank uerr ion �F! u ' • I M 1E[w��l►11EE1 ortli. Are • 8-i 6. or 1 1 / ' Y', :, a } - E. acvT PO MM.VIM& mill KAMM Kati. _r IK IIE[AS, i t ' • �py►� 4;1 i - is fIw{1�S.S. 1.,MELL M<rEEi!1Mfii�w E •• • 'EMAIL • S;�1. � zoos. i • El iE��i Mtn 1MTaT . \ 111 1 g. • Ec►ai Mum) • •i �' y•:�, j 1E05 s', y ». Al tNaNn[ ALL Et smile r[1� AE wwwEr Mt► \,' 3k. wan- 1 �� /' 7 KEMfMTIw 1�MlY rflt, Ear r M/�K Klw �, • r I•T.l�' �1�1 .. v-AA•l' �/• .`{ ry.- MOM I �' ♦ V ° U. ar AM Flit K Erfl AT 1.a Olt I, PICRIC MK{M{. NO 11 M1► SILL N r•'.b ��1 • 1 . tit �^ '/7 1 liniMMIL KI!KM Etl.INIIIT L,.A . . , 0) - \•;'PY ( vtr‘i!,- 44_0 ._ \ O 1 I I .' . \ ' �� PICNIC APIEA \ ._-.. , y.. 1 ; s , • ..1 "LM • :1 •`l - r- -. ,-._____ - . , +\ s�DIL O ti• J+CIF ��� •1.. .7-i.-•:t, 1111111111 f.. . _ I. ::.. ..: L111 \\ C \.,,\ ,,s,• . ,,. , • ,/.•,.' .-?,. _-_ -.-. ._...,\ -•iii 17M„...11.4•i'r:,r.ir.1A'l,1 Iv \ 1,.P,1IC•1„ i.-.r.\k AREAj'; �' _j '/�, ►+oRTrt \\.,,,1I!m 1 I#.--_I—aa..la r.l._ 1 nm , i_.•a %teta , .,.-,, \-s—,, ,,i \ i lt\i\.\,'\.,\,\.-.,\,,,,.,b.\..•:,cOi‘L ,, ...*--.:,._/_-..4‘.1 • \P.."Ie,.P' 11' �\ \ /�a •g�,' ti. �, p Y'�t i� r , ••` 1 w.w aw li•�wwf �� i � zir�K ,C.1it c S M1 s �'"f t' v •1.6 �'G '. SST - -. '' UT, rn444 p,ot+ L AD lbcp4) sor 64.E ■•M•/.g1s MI�> - •r w_ \\ ' \r ..-„, 9I� 0 I.. . •. .••'-• makaamKANU 6TTw�t, JiE —. �L4` t•WVMLI w B I N \\ I -r p Zp 40• Sp �p \'$I!;i `' 41) PICNIC AREA - TWO TABLE RING01) PICNIC AREA-THREE TABLE RING 111. I I 1yl�D^/I.L• �f �Yo•�iL•'I. ,�,� ,'�� emir-oM/L N 0.-,,ZI'!di \ \ , i 1 f F NOTE THE DESIGN VEHICLE USED FOR THIS SITE WAS AN SU30 WITH A DESIGN SPEED OF 15 mph. CONTOUR INTERVAL-T tills N ® \- A • Y 1 • •.o 0.1. .....• S:.•4 r.o' •.'s' L..... 'a:..:. ''1•....•i.Y.• ITANCKYVISTOSO—NEIGHBORF10013-7-- LANDSCAPE/DEVELOPMENT-PLAN -t 0-211-94 T.O.V.COMMENTS ,..••.600.n—oEOo 'Y r7•.3a c L-2 �{ y1 Cry ONE JAMB I .1••..T 2. O 44 17..E PLAN o.. xTe 6 B �.. ..•v.s1•r v..l•r CA YcKl//NE7 • a n•n-04 T.O.V.COMMENT, a•-^S. K.ai y, • ae Kl sva.-ly • ' • 12$• ',APLAN/GRADING c...c.. .. D.MY 1,9,. �pi° } 1 3 3 4 6 6 • • 10 II 17 1 14 IS MD IT j. .-L.`A• �• i �� rsTAL P.rc+A -- ' • ram.rwcm o�s "".."Y • / •_- . -OPEN TO SCONE C L COLOR S _ r�..- 1 - - N1 4aL0 Q • -.' ,. „r 9 CE70?O1 7 ter. ' -, !, r_.—..r-.--� Q _ `. •r c) /' 9 • A. Y LOX*kLR 4 MLR FAL2'CJ tll- GaA1 s-S I ,D F MlR+S1fA1 COLOR i slates• oi1 ' V 2, ' Y' Z / (/1C „ 1R OOR _ f 'r' F111i00_R Fil Wi .' 4 P . .W..4 ' NC //4 ""RA M • . „�Mt1''14 M 1. Pam' G EXTERIOR ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION , ALL aoc-bruLAR SCALE k' r-r•• REAR 11SVATfOM M11LAR KKK {try . '.ye•'• �- z e.›,ce, ,er..10410117.4/ 42120 MK I ( ' , •.•1,-. '-,,r..4 .Y.j Ci e � t 0�,`''`� :i • -_`... vt • r 1•1Y-J, v,-, I SAZIFTWAti I '—'"' ....-44411). .1, -/ g ~ t •1'�.:1i , :--1 (._vd:;;-"0.&_rm. 1 .,, lit- 1 . • .tip :.6 11 I - S .�'' • ', s�►�a s4•o� t j..! 4s).:;,: ' p �t.•' ,— ------ -----�. � ,. ' ROOF FRAMING PLAN • • '�-. ' 4` iG • kli ' -1 .� a _ O K.AL! Wtihl" •' l. *atii�`o`r JACK T1a16SEa�t�4•oc �, u-o r I ����-�r�S�!�i> 1%! !1 *?' I/I I/I /I !1 t ROOF FRAMING PLAN I%I 1 i '�,'_ • ecALe w",r o 0 1 r� I I/I CP I D1 •-i.,:`- _' r �� / I/I I/I 10! I/ t , - 7•-O• Y-4• „ lee-o" ' 3'-4• 'r-+''-4j, I/I I/I 10 r ',-'`.-`.NN»'f --j Ire JrL J I i ;.•. - i i (_////////////l//!I//7/I//,I---- -,j • �,I..�- Y y,rl;' _t . ,_ ......,‘ , • Irill `iN; FOUNDATION PLAN ` y . �•II I I S I : ac.�►s rws-,r�• i' Yy s.. c IML 4----- L J 11,-4• f 1*-4' 4•4' i•J' L• •-`. f A.--..., I CO RED I .:,' ' _ '' RAM .A ►' of 1 lc----- -,-,- --� �i • + �` J. �. t. ) . . :, :...;._,', ii t '..k. Iltallrallr. mociprIPillPirdr 0 . ... ... ./....4: i. ".`kl_.....ii, _ 5 411, -iv,- 1 t i. . - , .. — iiii>"'. - 0ot . „ . . '4.--47: , -— -1.: EAc,1 CELL• •`Tr /.. /- ,/• 1 I I I I I 4. S I : i 1 r_r _ - 5 r-r -\STORAGE I ,+ r ' -. _ --: H73 i /�� I I u 1 i I - / / c - - II �` 'Q"TWI .02 at FT4 i. I • -t I I E&,4TLC• I O1 I - MEM x 4$ ,i, • ). / \ .' ••,.4.44A- — I I T'p I sow rim i I -/_ 4 / \r-r , - "s b. y `� ITJII/III /-� -/Yz_/-zz 1-z7:.:_iz._//711i-i-i.r. 41.- - -- - -%-\:\-'. --1 I -.-..1 r.1..s:-L:1-1i:7----1'l't -Y-1.1::„i OA�G MiLr > i y n•-4. xr-o. ••'• -.49-0Cillt 0 ---tA-4.6.1 RAMAI)A FLOOR PLAN/ _ :t FOUNDATION PLAN RfSTROOM FLOOR PLAN - - - : - ' _''- .cxE w-,r-r WALE �s-.►r -4c,: _/.3= :;;4 s • i', 44411� -...l.,l. \• • \ / IX 4M►.e'l1.11L r �•, \ \ .Jf 4t o•iFr.Vil• NOTE: �� 1 \ \\ •\ \`�/: I `' 3 THE RANCHO VTSTOSO MASTER HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION .1 . ' ' 1- `� `.e* , t i ' / L SHALL ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY FOR MAINTENANCE,CONTROL, . /t1 ` I I SAFETY AND LIABILITY OF THESE FACILITIES. ' 1 3 N a ' • a ' LEGEND I a �` 8 . I ., ►! I ` ry — • 'e+tz000-rr . ) H HANDICAP PARKING SPACE • I ; / z• zow-�\ jPCNCAREA ) FT V • PRE-DEVELOPMENT 2 �d �� II± .. • r ^••-f_ 100 YR.FLOOD PLAIN sa02-slH.MO MACE°N1r 0 K•I►wi MrDnOS[E } _ wl - \ WfILITY►.I /LAC!To.so& • I ( \.: 1 �Z/� • P}CNK:AREA 2:1. V 1 POST DEVELOPMENT ,. • �:.,- 1Casa v Klr KAr• 707 SOFT. Nrglo•S!D, rM.:O•• 1 ,q'e� , +� 4 11CUEIlTTO►R317aT11 1 _ • lt, ,''•��/ MpR^IOESEfU NI:I,I'r• ' i FOLEs121� p 4 4rE�' --r 100 YR.FLOOD PLAM \/�I• ,MMAfI'mu'hew •!t;•,� jIrrv1 '1pS�� I1 y IWZO ; 5'rAx • � 17oox!o•.v..l0 IYYT.f •,•i' 1 • ,J ® ` 1OD�. s3.n •TO! •11, • -- (—77n.'m E�-'_• -,i,C 31 - Q p �`r'p�t. yl� kt' _ Ii. t\ f.CKFI.Lf CO�aCT00AT a '�i°•••� ".-_ AC PARKING \\ __, Jt� 'Isa�.1 olMsm • IOE�i I i 1 1 Tl)iF �I' 6 7 V teS i s050 SOFT. RN . .s�p -r 4 1 1 ` 1 m ;=1 ANYIIIAL SEE 41111 ilk �/ \ ,, •i 1 1 ''�• l \\\ ('T"1JETENT1ONBASWBERM l' ,; 1+'E----r1ArD PLACED Rp�RAP BASER LL FiELD L 2 HAND PLACED RP-RAP WITH HYDROSEED N i S • K 3j ^ '. `\, 56. SOFT. 1 1 �. L . .,t, „ .30•U 4T 1.OLE , `' \ / TURF / .. 1 • Sy ..I iI��� ;/ 3 1 EXTE O ° `� , / r f— NOTES: I i 1 o AT FIESTAOOAI �� RETENTION VOLUME T DEC01►�OSED LIOFR314i I. cons AREA OF 7�EL EIFF iS S.A KWS. v� /^ /• t2$ACRE FT. GaANITE j I RE TR•• IB • w'I t — O MAX.PONDING E�EV. 8 3 7. CEISTIRC ICRING IS PER MI1CM0 rtSTO50 P.A.D. -Mail MrStry RESIDEN11AL. ry ti ( 800SOFT ' 140 OOO 1 • AZA / TWALL, 2802.50' 7 ------- 1 �- 1. WILDING MANE Mam0CE FOR RESiMON IS 60o S.F. i G II II I ' // \ , R MADA T. 4. A MRA111MTE AREA IN P M IS 5.4 KIES. 1 I • 13 Q I E'lEG AETtIt ' �_ ,^� Mart I > 11 . / 1 / ` 1 PEDESTRIAN TRAIL S. WANGS EOulEvj11tESEAAINmGOE1 ]i1�to•AGE lsfi,CENTERLINE of Vilna rlsTosO _ 1' 1, 1 1,i� ! T I 11 � 7S� RE _ BERM : �� , L-2 6. MIS of ELE7ATra IOW 7 IS AooT yliZD6TTM 1 MSS otsc NEAOYAII TO 1 (APPR �L• ATTON °" �� FEET*Me of sTATTON 710.70. APPROXIMATELY 350 FEET S SIF OF NORTH I/4 1 TOT LOT 1 •"" cyci COINER of sEc-a s, Talmo.II soon+,RANGE I.EAST. ELEVATION 26ee m -53 DUCT 311lD It STA. LOCATION +� �\4.4tt3 SOFT. 40 Q rJ / I �3?s �� FEET. fps *• • •i e • ° ti) t----;- _ - 7. DEVELOPER PILL CDvOwrr TO?OLD TUw OF ORO PALLET, ITS AKLESSORS No u_ SLEEVE'oucr \\ —� 5'D.G. PEDESTRIA oPr'''. ..„..�5� t- � ASSIGNS. NAallEss ,N PIE EMT oF:Mein. - -1 TRAIL TYP. ." 7y. I. OMIlMCE WILL ROT SE ALTERED.01511AED OR OBSTRUCTED riTIWT TILE A►PROvAL ,•�•• 304LKi+1T VOLE t ° �; 'OF THE coo FALLEY.TOIAI MAUL. S. L 1sfIL .fi . - i 1 i /��:. f x T 2,4 .,c W • CST IRON FENCE-� .' 9t" •* �•,_ �. FLAYCla C FOR e+LSEaALL FIELD. 0. Ete+[lErz WILL SE mamma LOCATED Pratt A�INIZE \ \i*. ° :l . - CO AVOID DISTJKARCE OF ErS.PLAZA AND S XISTING TREES AIO YESETAT OWlOUITED TO NiNINIiE 36-►PGl BOLLARD LK3NT 61 y'.... .. ./. .9, • 10. Mi, LAF4SCAPE WILL W WEIRS WITH M M1TOIMTTC 1100111111110 SNIP eo y � I�IGTIOM STSTHI- TURF AREA WILL � WATERED WITH All AUTCMTIC sa11AT I „, ` -A L •..• • .a`'►��� putIGATION MIEN \\,,t E (•`eA. •••, e' • -�'-.0 11. OJT AID FILL SLOES AT RAT CWRTS. PICNIC AREAS, AIR PLAZA WILL SE 4,4 • e - • NPCRTSEEDED SEE SEED III. SHEET L_A .\ ,.. oct - or.,,,v.-.4 4, .t t� ,,�� SPA �[ • • 314 SOFT. r- ` . -?1- • \ yi./ P/CNIC AFA `i IE • cau.ere AND e• a o' ' SAND of 6PANsIOr/t G --A— — + \ . •25 LK1FT POLES 121 • '"I A / . \ \ \, \\ •S / 1 lab -'> '. 'l \ ' 1111 I ° e 1 \ •- ytitl • / LtG1tFIlL : ---/--- /- \` --1 O'er ` ;_ ' '• 'r.'{1 . ' L _ i \ '` 4\ L. ; PICNIC AREA_' `t • i::( - ' �� a (-7-) t�\ T07 SOFT '` - ♦ 1nAn1 - 1\ q • NOTE:AL6H ALL •.1 - ->•—'. , ■ -,...- % C \ \` \ -,['\ AI M PIGWIG ARL•'! AS U -- \�• \ - ® L-i _• 4, s ,g/N-`'�-11. 1 ;I�•A 4+tivy 0+7 •T►+IS Dl rMt. , ,y, •`I^','W.(`r ,�,v„F ..•s;:..+. \\\, \- '' • 7 \<.'77 - -'f- s se rrr E OS) �7t� 1J '� M' 7• 1' 1 ib1eL N•i4r,1 GPSTY( MN:v[o1•r \'•S\ `gO�CA �o�r 1JS.r \ ■Mrrse•ve Arm. ttti=.HF Ir :�E-'�_��: c to �\ \�f 77TG ---,3 I ,a.ly11 • hMNurrlcnw2�1• - \ -�'e�•` ``It1 M \ \ rioofL! w 7Dtsis miii,ii) 0' �' �' 80' 120'�\ \ 1 i :fir 3 PICNIC AREA - TWO TABLE RiNG tf4�1 PICNIC AREA - THREE TABLE RING \ I ' „aa-•w...�.9•••Ts.J, •tI.O•9-3,c,y• «tip' L-.2 L-2, N1 1 I.\ NOTE THE DESIGN VEHICLE USED FOR THIS SITE WAS AN SU30 WITH A DESIGN SPEED OF 15 mph. CONTOUR INTERVAL::T I :!, , S ,1 r• LeMKeN Me.r.r w•.Los. M CN••w GHBo0HOOD7- n ilinEJE3 ••• °. p��pprr��ii UTIETTYPEAR E�aoo1A oTOs �,K PARCEL_ --- .- IIl71rESIWER 20.1996 • •w f. Mai 1 f :4; f? 1� TOWN OF ORO VALLEY *4` f 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE ' r ORO VALLEY ARIZONA 85737 '' Administrative Offices(520)297-2591 Fax(520)297-0428 °UNDEO�g January 10, 1996 National Bank of Arizona P. O. Box 12009 Tucson, AZ 85732-2009 RE: Time Deposit 326617-1 - Vistoso Partners, L.L.C. Dear Sir: Vistoso Partners, L.L.C. has assigned a time deposit to the Town of Oro Valley for $300,000. This is our authorization to reduce the amount of the assignment to the Town by $178,00 to a new balance of $122,000. Sincerely, Mary Jo Peterson Assurances Coordinator APPROVED BY: T wn Engine r P\LEY 4R/ QO c>OZ O /16) TOWN OF ORO VALLEY r ► 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE 4 ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA 85737 Administrative Offices(520)297-2591 Fax(520)297-0428 A A June 28, 1996 National Bank of Arizona P. O. Box 12009 Tucson, AZ 85732-2009 RE: Time Deposit 326617-1 - Vistoso Partners, L.L.C. Dear Sir: Vistoso Partners, L.L.C. had assigned a time deposit to the Town of Oro Valley for $300,000. We have previously reduced the amount of assignment required to $122,000. This is our authorization to reduce the amount of the assignment to the Town by $58,000 to a new balance of $64,000. Sincerely, Mary Jo Peterson Assurances Coordinator APPROVED BY: Town Engineer U t i Uoi vo il;Ua IXOVZ (WI 1JJU lgJ UU1 I VISTOSO PARTNERS 5861 S. Kyrene Rd., Suite 1 Tempe, AZ 85283 602-831-2000 July 8, 1996 Chuck Sweet Town of Oro Valley 11000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley, AZ 85737 Subject: Neighborhood 7,Park Area Dear Chuck, In follow up to our phone conversation on Wednesday, the following is a construction schedule for the park improvements: Rough Grading is in process ncw_ Volleyball court,Basketball court, and the Tot Lot will be completed by August 15th. Ramada Bathrooms and parking lot will be completed by September 15th_ Softball field lighting,and irrigation will be completed by October 15th. The W.A_P.A line trail in Neighborhood 7 will be completed by the end of July, and you will see significant progress on the part,;improvements by the end of July. We presently have a $121,000 cash bond in place for re-seeding the golf course and the entry road. I would be willing to leave,that bond in place to secure the improvements that we are doing at the park. I know we are behind schedule on completing the park before 40% of the permits were pulled and I apologize for our failure to compete our obligation. We intend to complete the park as quickly as possible and to build a facility that the property owners as well as the Town can be proud of I want to thank you for working with us while we are catching up on our obligations_ I will be out of town from July 8th to Jury 12th but will be available July 15th. Sincerely, 0:4) Ivo Dick Maes PbS DM/pls TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: July 15, 1996 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL FROM: Don Chatfield, AICP, Planning and Zoning Director SUBJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF RECREATION AREA, RANCHO VISTOSO, NEIGHBORHOOD 7, PURSUANT TO PLAT NOTES FOR PARCELS C, G, AND H RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION LIMITATION OF FORTY PERCENT SUMMARY: The Rancho Vistoso PAD identifies a number of private recreation areas, located throughout the PAD. According to the adopted PAD ordinance, the master developer (currently Vistoso Partners) is responsible for the installation and construction of these private recreation areas. Upon installation, the operation and maintenance of these facilities becomes the responsibility of the master homeowner association (presently known as the Vistoso Community Association). BACKGROUND: Construction of homes commenced in Neighborhood 7 during the late 1980s. A number of homebuilders, including US Home and Vision began construction in the area during that time. According to these original homebuyers, a number of representations were made that the Neighborhood 7 Recreation Area would be installed "soon." After the Rancho Vistoso PAD was purchased from bankruptcy, a number of new subdivisions were granted approval to develop within Neighborhood 7. Due to the fact that the Recreation Area had not yet been constructed, each of these approvals contained a plat restriction indicating that no more than 40% of each subdivision could be constructed until the Recreation Area was complete. Approved subdivisions that include this plat restriction are Neighborhood 7, Parcel C (UDC Homes), Neighborhood 7, Parcel H (Pulte Homes), and Neighborhood 7, Parcel G (New World Homes and Canoa Homes). Each of these subdivisions have currently reached 40% of their buildout, or are rapidly nearing buildout. CURRENT STATUS: The Recreation Area site is being prepared for construction. Native plant salvage has occurred on the site, the site has been grubbed, and some very preliminary grading work has taken place. The Town Engineer has approved, in concept, a temporary gravel roadway and paved asphalt sidewalk to access the site from Arrowsmith Drive. A great deal of concern has been expressed by both the current homeowners and the builders who are not eligible to receive any further building permits. Although construction has now commenced on the TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 3 Recreation Area site, there are no guarantees in place to ensure that the facility will be completed in a timely fashion. POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS: The requirement to construct recreational facilities relates to the Town's concern that safe and sufficient recreational amenities be provided to its residents. The Town of Oro Valley has adopted standards that guide the number of acres and facilities that are to be provided for our population. Further, the standards of the various codes strive to ensure that these facilities are constructed in a safe manner. Given the fact that Vistoso Partners has, thus far, failed to provide a recreation area as provided by the PAD ordinance, the Town Council may wish to consider the following solutions: 1) Vote to stay the consideration of any further plats or plan amendments within the Rancho Vistoso PAD. For example, Parcels H and N on this evening's agenda could be continued until such time as the Recreation Area in Neighborhood 7 is complete. 2) Require that a bond, or bonds, be collected to cover the cost of construction. Mr. Dick Maes has indicated verbally that the total construction cost will be between $300,000 and $400,000 for the facility. If a bond, or bonds, are collected, a time frame of four months could be established to complete construction. If construction is not complete in that time period, then the monies would be claimed and the Town would contract to have the facility completed. If a bond, or bonds, are collected, staff would support releasing the homebuilders to continue construction. As the future of the Recreation Area would be secured by the bond, there would be no reason to deny construction during this four month period. RECOMMENDATION: Representatives from Vistoso Partners, UDC Homes, Pulte Homes, and New World Homes will be in attendance at this evening's meeting to discuss the situation. We recommend that the issue be discussed with these representatives and homeowners. Staff finds that alternative #2, above, would provide the optimal solution, ensuring the eventual completion of the facility. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 3 of 3 ;1,frita.)-1`14;10 1l SUGGESTED MOTION: • ' °� I MOVE to REQUIRE that a bond(s) in the amount of$ 7(.O b 10 , be posted with the Town DI Ao of Oro Valley for the construction of the Neighborhood 7 Recreation Area, with the understanding that this V bond will be held for a period of four months. If the Recreation Area is not complete at this time, the Town will claim the bond(s) and contract the construction of this facility. Upon posting of this bond, building permits may be issued for Parcels C, H, and G of Neighborhood 7. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Letter from Mr. Dick Maes dated July 8, 1996 F:\...\dlc\memos\rec_area.tcc au. f� /A./ i , D: I ar nt Head l f AAA.. At' Town Manager VISTOSO PARTNERS, LLC 5861 S..11Cyrese bid,Suite 1 Tempe,Arizona'85283 4602)8314000 July 23, 1996 Ms,Waudajune Rattan Bank of America a.L 9325 N.South® Phoenix,AZ 85020 Dear Wanda` Vistoso Parlaers,LLC hereby a nthcri es Bank America to assign our«zrificate of deposit account#0259276227 in the-aaolmat 5300,000 to the Town of Oro Valley as aas relating to the construction mf the _ Neighborhood 7,Parcel G of our �� azance development - ••• as Rattho Viscose. No withdrawals of principal can be �2 •:•• this without anihccizatiou from the Town of Oro Valley. Further,VYstaso Partners t o izes*at in acccrabnce with Sec.4-901F of the Town of Oro Valley Zaniag Code,the funds it,this aceeont shall be released to the Town of Oro Valley upcxi demand by the Town for rthe puapose of completing improvements which v not cow by the developer widria )20 days\ot whiff have been abandoned by the dc:relopear as determined by the Towr•Engmter an the Planning and Zoning Director.. cctr),&_4i-163 Signed this 23rd day of July, 1996. AZ/tram` Daryl A Wolfswmkd Manager of Vistoso Partners.LLC _1 Ras a( 1,t) T-174 C.40 rcz `A*Yu ELa6u' �L�C..itep vSt= IT 96-£Z-Lnr ZO d � 90Z £-b-b 80Z 0 (-C-7. aelifC2-1 I&A-4 rad4tc V. A*�� � 177 NORTH CHURCH, SUITE 610 t FRANK CASSIDY, ATTORNEY TUCSON, ARIZONA 8570 I (520) 628-7777 Town of Ora Valley FAx (520) 628 7672 July 24, 1996 VIA FAx(602/831-1330); ORIGINAL MAILED VIA FAx(297-0428); ORIGINAL MAILED Dick Maes Don Chatfield, Planning Director VLSTOSO PARTNERS LLC TOWN OF ORO VALLEY - 5861 South Kyrene Road, Suite 1 11000 North La Canada Drive Tempe, Arizona 85283 Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 Re: VISTOSO PARTNERS LLC Recreation Area Bond Dear Dick and Don: A little earlier this afternoon, I faxed each of you a copy of the letter I have sent to BANx OF AMERICA concerning the $300,000 certificate of deposit. As you know, the Council's action also requires that $60,000 of the golf course bond be transferred over to secure the recreation improvements, bringing the total security to $360,000. Although I see no reason to delay issuance of permits while we deal with the $60,000, we should come to some understanding about how we are going to deal with it. As I understand it, the $60,000 is part of a $121,000-plus certificate of deposit. I propose the execution of a simple document or documents by VISTOSO PARTNERS, the TowN OF ORO VALLEY, and the bank acknowledging the handling of the funds, similar to the documentation which was prepared concerning the $300,000 certificate of deposit. If this documentation already exists but simply needs to be amended to refer to the recreation area improvements, please provide me with copies and we'll go from there. Please contact me if you have questions or need additional information concerning this matter. Your consideration is appreciated. Sincere y, Frank sidy • • F:\DATANOV\PLANNING\VSTSOLLTR eq). C62. 1 77 NORTH CHURCH, SUITE 6 I 0 FRANK CASSIOY, ATTORNEY TUCSON, ARIZONA 8570 I (520) 628-7777 FAX (520) 628-7672 July 29, 1996 VLA FAx(602/943-0641); ORIGINAL MAILED Wandajune Barton BANK OF AMERICA ARIZONA 9325 North Seventh Phoenix, Arizona 85020 Re: VlsToso PARTNERS LLC $300,000 Certificate of Deposit #0259276227 Dear Wanda: As I mentioned by telephone this afternoon, I represent the TOWN OF ORO VALLEY. The TowN has received a fax copy of a letter dated July 23, 1996 from Daryl A. Wolfswinkel, Mana;er of VISTOSo PARTNERS LLC, to BANK OF AMERICA ARIZONA concerning the disposition of funds held in the above referenced account. In order for the TowN to proceed with issuance of building permits, the TowN requests written acknowledgment by BANK OF AMERICA ARIZONA that the funds in this account shall be released to the TowN upon written demand by the TOWN for the purpose of completing Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 7 recreation area improvements, and that BANK OF AMERICA ARIZONA will allow no withdrawals of principal from this account without the express written authorization of the TowN. Please have an authorized party sign below, and return this document to me by fax and mail. Upon receipt of the fax copy, the TOWN will proceed with issuance of building permits; provided, however, that further permits will be withheld if the original is not received by this office by Friday, August 2. . Please contact me if you have questions or if you need additional information. Sincere , ACKNOWLEDGED: BANK OF AMERICA ARIZONA / , rank C idy BANK OF AMERICA B 03 By: !kb - / //qb w9325 N.rTl UNE sir. n.Ki.c.2 0 .r PHOENIX. $ O2O 602-24.8A 355 xc (via fax only): Dick Maes, VISToso PARTNERS LLC Don Chatfield, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY F:IDATAIOV\PLANNING\BA VSTS2.LTR VISTOSO PARTNERS 5861 S. Kyrene Rd.., Suite 1 Tempe, AZ 85283 602-831-2000 November 18, 1996 Don Chatfield Town of Oro Valley 11000 N. La Canada Oro Valley, AZ 85737 Subject: Neighborhood 7 Park Dear Don, • Attached is a current copy of th4)itemized costs that have been incurred to date toward construction of the neighborhood 7 Parx. I would like to request that$300,000.00 of the bond money being held as a guarantee be released at this time. That will leave$60,000.00 still held as security to complete the park. If there are any questions please contact me. Sincerely Zil. .../de--17.....c,,.....-- Richard Maes - RMlpls 11/10/0U LU.JL (3UUL 001 14JU lQJ UUJ VISTOS0 PARTWERB,LLC SCHEDULE OF COSTS IWC URRED TO DATE UPDATED ON NOVW.BER 18,1E 00 PARK IN MEIG131)ORHOOD 7 ]CI B TOTAL MOUNT DAVID ABRIL LABOR 448.00 FRANK ABRJL LABOR 75.00 AMERICAN FENCO CO OF AZ BASEBALL BACKSTOP 3.016.00 ARAVAIPA LANDSCAPE EARTHWORK-GRADING&RIP RAP wVORK 66.000.00 REJMB-2ILT FENCE ie1.50 GRUB.CLEAR&BURY BRUSH 1,056.00 IRRIGATION MAINLINES&TRENCHI:IG Z,616.00 PLAYGROUND&VOLL EYBAl,L 587.50 • ELECTRICAL CONST 4,270,76 BUILDING&DRAIN PIPE CONST 4,703.85 EXTRA GRADING,SUSGRADE WO%K 3,923.50 BALLFIELD TURF TOPSOIL MIX 6,948.09 B&B MASONRY CO..INC RESTROOMS 8 RAMADA 12,431.00 LEE R BAYS CONCRETE RAMADA SLAB&FOOTINGS,BATHROOM FLOOR 30,137.31 b FOOTINGS,BASKETBALL COURT,CURB FOR VOLLEYBALL,&SIDEWALK AROUN&'PLAY YARD BEST PAVING INC. PARKING LOT 10_450.00 BROOKHAVEN BUILDERS,INC. RAMADA FRAMING(50%),RESTROOM 5,394.00 STORAGE FRAMING AND CHILDREN S COMPLETE RAMADA FRAMING(507E-t 2,042.00 TWO SKYLIGHTS 338.34 COMPLETE RESTROOM/STORAGE FRAMING 2,776.00 STRIP FORMS A GLEAN-Up CHILDRON'S PLAY AREA 135.00 • MISC-CLEAN-UP,RAMADA CEILING.SEC.LABOR 03S.00 FABRICATE REBAR RINGS-LIGHTS. 885.00 RAMADA TRIM 8 PAINTING,ELEC VO:)RK FOR LIGHTS 2,089.50 SIDEWALK AND LIGHT WORK 1,040.00 DAVE BANG ASSOC,INC PLAYGROUND EQUIP.PICNIC TABLE-S. 29b42.00 BENCHES,GRILLS,EtAsKETRALL& VOLLEYBALL POSTS CARNAL PLUMBING FIRST DRAW-30%OF WATER HOOt'-UP 706.00 2ND DRAW WATER&SEWER HOoIc.JP 3,363 .37 EXCAVATING-EXTRA BACKFILL CHARGE 450.00 CONT EcH PIPES 2,783.15 DENNY'S AUTO PAIN'/MAES PAINT BIKE RACKS-Si 00,MASS REIMBURSED$20 120.00 DESERT COMPOST BALLFIELD-MIX-IN FOR SOIL BEFOFE GRASS 3,873 46 ELECTRICAL EXCELLENCE LIGHTING-INCLUDING POLES,LAMPS&PICTURES 18.245.00 JOI-IN HILLER CO PAINTING RAMADA. 600.00 HOME DEPOT(REIMS GRIFFIN) SCUPPER, 30.17 KALAMAZOO MATERIALS SOFTBALL FIELD,IN-FIELD GRAVEL(ESTIMATE) 3,062.50 KENT MECHANICAL PAINT LOCK FLASHING-RAMADA/BATHROOM 62844 DWAYNE G LEWIs ARCHITECTS DESIGN RAMADAS/RESTROOMS 1,500.00 MESA sPWNKLER IRRIGATION PARTS-8R IRRIGATION PAR$-g/1g 4 .32 • .073.32 IRRIGATION PARTS- 9/30 - IRRIGATION PARTS- 10/1 85.60 2E19.54 4ONRAD ENGINEERING.INC. DESIGN OF ELECTRICAL..IRRIGATION& I_IGIfnNG SYSTEMS 1,SI�,00 A0UNTAIN STATES NURSERY SMALL TREES a SHRUBS 2,381.92 MOWN OF ORO VALLEY BUILDING PERMIT S42.56 'IONEER SAND(DAWSON CC) SAND FOR VOI.I.Eyma SAND FOR PLAYGROUND AREA 2636.42 3,77s.48 IOADR1 4NER ROLL-OFFS CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS 576115 RESTROOM RENTAL 155.00 VAYNE S ENS EMAN CONSULTING 13/16-7/15 CONSULTING 7116.8118 3,000.00 CONSULTING 8/16-6/'I b ,000.00 3,000.00 CONSULTING JNG 9t 18-10/15 CONSULTING 1011$-11H S 3,000.00 3,000.00REIMBURSEMENT' - ROADRUNNER ROLL-OFFS CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS 576.85 • RESTROOM RENTAL 155.00 WAYNE SENSEMAN CONSULTING 9I18-7/15 1,500.00 • CONSULTING ME.-8/15 3,000.0a • • CONSULTTNG 8/16-an is 3.000.00 • CONSULTING 9/18-10/15 3.000.00 • CONSULTING 10118-11/15 3,004.00 • REIMBURSEMENT 566,99 REIMBURSEMENT 3.29273 - REIMBURSEMENT 9,701#5 TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER CO SMALL&UNUSUAL LOAD CONTRACT 2,905.00 THE WLB GROUP LANDSCAPE PLANS 7,688.88 • REVIEW t4YDROLOGy 4 REVISE DESL' LS 7,391 S3 DRAJNAGE BASIN 377.5B WESTERN SOO TURF-SOFTBALL FIELD 11,403.8$ WESTERN TREE GO MAIN ORDER OF TREES FOR PARK 2,2 .73 MESQUITES.BLUE PALO VERDES&s'SNEErACACIAS 1.430.98 TOTALS 301,841.50 SAvELI...21 CMIST030.01WRIIJAWA November 21, 1996 Dick Maes Vistoso Partners, L.L.C. 5861 S. Kyrene Road Tempe, AZ 85283 Dear Mr. Maes: Thank you for meeting with several members of the Vistoso Community Association Park Advisory Committee this evening at the information Center in Rancho Vistoso, concerning the park. As per our meeting, please find a copy of the petition signed by 183 (out of 187) surveyed residents of Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 7. This petition includes 22 of the 34 members of the Vistoso Community Association Park Advisory Committee, (with several members still unavailable). As we discussed last night, we can not accept the Wildlife Ridge Park (Neighborhood 7 Park) until the park is completed, per the petition (with exception to Item 4). Last night's meeting raised another concern regarding the restroom locks, or lack there of. After exploring many options at one of our P.A.C. meetings, in keeping the restrooms "private", Mark suggested "coded door locks" and explained why it would best serve our needs. We agreed that this added amenity would ensure both privacy and security, as well as reduce the overall maintenance costs. Please refer to the P.A.C. update, dated August 20, 1996 "item b." in which the number coded door and push bar were approved by the VPLLC (enclosed). Thank you in advance for your prompt attention to these concerns, which represent the feelings of 183 of the Association's residents. We are confident that you will fulfill your obligations in completing the park. Thank you again for meeting with us. Sincerely, Paula Abbott Diane Gurr VCAPAC Member VCAPAC Member cc: Mark Lewis, LMR (petition) cc: Town of Oro Valley Enc. Vistoso Community Association Parks Advisory Committee August 20, 1996 Park Update: 1. Construction on schedule for completion of major amenities by mid-late October target date. Ramada, restrooms in process. Volleyball and basketball foundation in place. Irrigation system being installed at softball field. 2. Road Access- an asphalt walkway will be installed along the eastside of Woodburne from the parking lot to Arrowsmith. Woodburne will be a gravel road from Arrowsmith to the parking lot. 3. Park equipment.to be delivered within 2-3 weeks. 4. 11/9/96 Park Dedication Ceremony Action/Followup Items (LMR/VPLLC/TOWN/PAC) a. Pay phone to be located on rear of building facing parking lot; can awning be added to extend 3-4 feet out from the building? (LMR/VPLLC) b. Door closure to be number code, exterior door handle to be lever, while interior door handle to be push bar. (VPLLC) c. At Woodburne/Arrowsmith, the members requested that OV place the following • (LMR/TOWN) i. • stop sign at crosswalk for vehicles travelling west on Arrowsmith approaching Woodburne; eliminate yield sign ii. crosswalk stripping at same location in i above iii. pedestrian crossing sign on Arrowsmith before Woodburne iv. research what can be done to stop vehicles travelling south on Woodburne approaching to turn left onto Arrowsmith from cutting off the intersection and speeding through the turn (is a temporary stop sign possible at this area, until Woodburne is connected d. Timing system for misting system for seasonal changes and so the misting system does not remain on for hours (initial construction will not include mist system). (VPLLC) e. At the large picnic node area on the north side of the park that was adjusted to allow for the extra swingset, will there also be benches/chairs at this location since there will not be picnic tables. (VPLLC) VtCO .Co m a AsscoattbilTairK Adi13ory Co1/ IfteL. — Larry Rosette Keith Stewart Anna Malkin Canyon Way Lantern Way Tucson, AZ 85737 Tucson, AZ 85737 Tucson, AZ 85737 Colleen Vance Kaye Coates Pam Wilkinson Granville Canyon Way - Copper Queen Way Dover Place Tucson, AZ 85737 Tucson, AZ 85737 Tucson, AZ 85737 Peg Gaillard Lori & Jeff Hickman Jim Seaney Tucson, AZ 85737 Tucson, AZ 85737 Tucson, AZ 85737 vlike Humphrey Bob Hankel Isabel Chavez [ oger & Paula Abbott Carlene Henry Dave & Jeannette Gerlach . (lathy Shaheen Camille McKeever gen Ruiz . 'oyce O'Dea Brenda Polo Linda Symchak ? ran Purr Diane Gurr Dean McCook ran LaSala Bonnie Morris Kenn Gordon _ ohn & Donna Riley Dennis & Teri Rogers s , Your Neighborhood 7 Park is nearing completion. The members of the Vistoso Community Association Park Advisory Committee have been working in the best interests to interface with the Vistoso Community Association, Developer and the Town of Oro Valley. Your help is needed to ensure a fully functional and safe park for our children. We, the undersigned, as residents of Rancho Vistoso, wish to go on record that we refuse acceptance of the Neighborhood 7 Park (Wildlife Ridge Park) from the Developer (Vistoso Partners, LLC) until it is completely finished and the following items are realized: 1. Retention/detention basin completed to the Town of Oro Valley's specification. This retention/detention area is a safety hazard to our children in its present state. We deem, as Members of the Vistoso Community Association, that this retention/detention area is an "attractive nuisance" and could adversely affect the health, safety, and welfare of our children and residents. 2. Black rubber matting safety material/handicap surface to be placed in tot lot area as promised by the developer. 3. The pay telephone moved from wall of restroom to a free-standing post as agreed upon with the developer and management company, for ADA accessibility. 4. The restroom and ramada painted light brown or tan to conform with the rest of the homes in the neighborhood. 5. Anti-graffiti solution applied on restroom and ramada once they are painted. 6. Park lights, with timers to be installed and in working order as promised by the developer. 7. Bulletin Board to be placed on restroom wall as agreed upon with the developer and management company. 8. Bicycle racks installed as agreed upon by the developer. 9. Drinking fountain installed as agreed upon by developer. 10. Swing set placed in tot lot as agreed upon by the developer. 11. Second swing set, as originally promised and then eliminated by developer, to be ordered and installed by the developer. 12. Basketball lines painted on the basketball court and basketball hoops installed. 13. Volleyball net installed at volleyball court. 14. Bases to be installed on softball field as per discussion with management company. 15. Restroom doors to have electronic coded locks with lever handle. Interior "panic bars" installed as per discussion with-management company. 16. Barriers of dirt to be placed as agreed upon by developer and management company to prevent vehicle access to park interior. 17. Monument sign and other signs for the park posted as agreed upon by developer and management company. 18. All plans/changes requiring Town of Oro Valley approval be completed and accepted. 19. At least a one year warranty on park items/areas including structures, plants, sprinklers, access roads/paths and other items, including any city-approved modifications to retention/detention area. 20. Trash receptacles to be placed in designated areas as discussed with management company. (PRINT) NAME • ADDRESS SIGNATURE ` `' �.IL'V f , , „, u ect.._ _, ... ,,,„ Your Neighborhood 7 Park is nearing completion. The members of the Vistoso Community Association Park Advisory Committee have been working in the best interests to interface with the Vistoso Community Association, Developer and the Town of Oro Valley. Your help is needed to ensure a fully functional and safe park for our children. We, the undersigned, as residents of Rancho Vistoso, wish to go on record that we refuse acceptance of the Neighborhood 7 Park (Wildlife Ridge Park) from the Developer (Vistoso Partners, LLC) until it is completely finished and the following items are realized: 1. Retention/detention basin completed to the Town of Oro Valley's specification. This retention/detention area is a safety hazard to our children in its present state. We deem, as Members of the Vistoso Community Association, that this retention/detention area is an "attractive nuisance" and could adversely affect the health, safety, and welfare of our children and residents. 2. Black rubber matting safety material/handicap surface to be placed in tot lot area as promised by the developer. 3. The pay telephone moved from wall of restroom to a free-standing post as agreed upon with the developer and management company, for ADA accessibility. 4. The restroom and ramada painted light brown or tan to conform with the rest of the homes in the neighborhood. 5. Anti-graffiti solution applied on restroom and ramada once they are painted. 6. Park lights, with timers to be installed and in working order as promised by the developer. 7. Bulletin Board to be placed on restroom wall as agreed upon with the developer and management company. 8. Bicycle racks installed as agreed upon by the developer. 9. Drinking fountain installed as agreed upon by developer. 10. Swing set placed in tot lot as agreed upon by the developer. 11. Second swing set, as originally promised and then eliminated by developer, to be ordered and installed by the developer. 12. Basketball lines painted on the basketball court and basketball hoops installed. 13. Volleyball net installed at volleyball court. 14. Bases to be installed on softball field as per discussion with management company. 15. Restroom doors to have electronic coded locks with lever handle. Interior "panic bars" installed as per discussion with management company. 16. Barriers of dirt to be placed as agreed upon by developer and management company to prevent vehicle access to park interior. 17. Monument sign and other signs for the park posted as agreed upon by developer and management company. 18. All plans/changes requiring Town of Oro Valley approval be completed and accepted. 19. At least a one year warranty on park items/areas including structures, plants, sprinklers, access roads/paths and other items, including any city-approved modifications to retention/detention area. 20. Trash receptacles to be placed in designated areas as discussed with management company. `.� (PRINT) NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE ( k_a / /, k G �, � Your Neighborhood 7 Park is nearing completion. The members of the Vistoso Community Association Park Advisory Committee have been working in the best interests to interface with the Vistoso Community Association, Developer and the Town of Oro Valley. Your help is needed to ensure a fully functional and safe park for our children. We, the undersigned, as residents of Rancho Vistoso, wish to go on record that we refuse acceptance of the Neighborhood 7 Park (Wildlife Ridge Park) from the Developer (Vistoso Partners, LLC) until it is completely finished and the following items are realized: 1. Retention/detention basin completed to the Town of Oro Valley's specification. This retention/detention area is a safety hazard to our children in its present state. We deem, as Members of the Vistoso Community Association, that this retention/detention area is an "attractive nuisance" and could adversely affect the health, safety, and welfare of our children and residents. 2. Black rubber matting safety material/handicap surface to be placed in tot lot area as promised by the developer. 3. The pay telephone moved from wall of restroom to a free-standing post as agreed upon with the developer and management company, for ADA accessibility. 4. The restroom and ramada painted light brown or tan to conform with the rest of the homes in the neighborhood. 5. Anti-graffiti solution applied on restroom and ramada once they are painted. 6. Park lights, with timers to be installed and in working order as promised by the developer. 7. Bulletin Board to be placed on restroom wall as agreed upon with the developer and management company. 8. Bicycle racks installed as agreed upon by the developer. 9. Drinking fountain installed as agreed upon by developer. 10. Swing set placed in tot lot as agreed upon by the developer. 11. Second swing set, as originally promised and then eliminated by developer, to be ordered and installed by the developer. 12. Basketball lines painted on the basketball court and basketball hoops installed. 13. Volleyball net installed at volleyball court. 14. Bases to be installed on softball field as per discussion with management company. 15. Restroom doors to have electronic coded locks with lever handle. Interior "panic bars" installed as per discussion with management company. 16. Barriers of dirt to be placed as agreed upon by developer and management company to prevent vehicle access to park interior. 17. Monument sign and other signs for the park posted as agreed upon by developer and management company. 18. All plans/changes requiring Town of Oro Valley approval be completed and accepted. 19. At least a one year warranty on park items/areas including structures, plants, sprinklers, access roads/paths and other items, including any city-approved modifications to retention/detention area. 20. Trash receptacles to be placed in designated areas as discussed with management company. (PRINT) NAME ADDRESS I NATURE r;ej-X,*-(D 0,7utkriqpfi . „ �� - • Your Neighborhood 7 Park is nearing completion. The members of the Vistoso Community Association Park Advisory Committee have been working in the best interests to interface with the Vistoso Community Association, Developer and the Town of Oro Valley. Your help is needed to ensure a fully functional and safe park for our children. We, the undersigned, as;residents of Rancho Vistoso, wish to go on record that we refuse acceptance of the Neighborhood 7 Park (Wildlife Ridge Park) from the Developer (Vistoso Partners, LLC) until it is completely finished and the following items are realized: 1. Retention/detention basin completed to the Town of Oro Valley's specification. This retention//detention area is a safety hazard to our children in its present state. We deem, as Member of the Vistoso Community Association, that this retention/detention area is an "attractive nuisance" and could adversely affect the health, safety, and welfare of our children and residents. 2. Black rubber matting safety material/handicap surface to be placed in tot lot area as promised by the developer. 3. The pay telephone moved from wall of restroom to a free-standing post as agreed upon with the developer and management company, for ADA accessibility. 4. The restroom and ramada painted light brown or tan to conform with the rest of the homes in the neighborhood. ,5. Anti-graffiti solution applied on restroom and ramada once they are painted. (6. Park lights, with timers to be installed and in working order as promised by the developer. 7. Bulletin Board to be placed on restroom wall as agreed upon with the developer and management company. 8. Bicycle racks installed as agreed upon by the developer. 9. Drinking fountain installed as agreed upon by developer. 10. Swing set placed in tot lot as agreed upon by the developer. 11. Second swing set, as originally promised and then eliminated by developer, to be ordered and installed by the developer. 12. Basketball lines painted on the basketball court and basketball hoops installed. 13. Volleyball net installed at volleyball court. 14. Bases to be installed on softball field as per discussion with management company. 15. Restroom doors to have electronic coded locks with lever handle. Interior "panic bars" installed as per discussion with management company. 16. Barriers of dirt to be placed as agreed upon by developer and management company to prevent vehicle access to park interior. 17. Monument sign and other signs for the park posted as agreed upon by developer and management company. 18. All plans/changes requiring Town of Oro Val ey approval be completed and accepted. 19. At least a one year warranty on park items/ reas including structures, plants, sprinklers, access roads/paths and other items, including any city-approved modifications to retention/detention area. 20. Trash receptacles to be placed in designated areas as discussed with management company. (PRINT) NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE ZiAJD S yyv1a4A-/ ka `I ja()A Your Neighborhood 7 Park is nearing completion. The members of the Vistoso Community Association Park Advisory Committee have been working in the best interests to interface with the Vistoso Community Association, Developer and the Town of Oro Valley. Your help is needed to ensure a fully functional and safe park for our children. We, the undersigned, as residents of Rancho Vistoso, wish to go on record that we refuse acceptance of the Neighborhood 7 Park (Wildlife Ridge Park) from the Developer (Vistoso Partners, LLC) until it is completely finished and the following items are realized: 1. Retention/detention basin completed to the Town of Oro Valley's specification. This retention/detention area is a safety hazard to our children in its present state. We deem, as Members of the Vistoso Community Association, that this retention/detention area is an "attractive nuisance" and could adversely affect the health, safety, and welfare of our children and residents. 2. Black rubber matting safety material/handicap surface to be placed in tot lot area as promised by the developer. 3. The pay telephone moved from wall of restroom to a free-standing post as agreed upon with the developer and management company, for ADA accessibility. The restroom and ramada painted light brown or tan to conform with the rest of the homes in the neighborhood. 5. Anti-graffiti solution applied on restroom and ramada once they are painted. 6. Park lights, with timers to be installed and in working order as promised by the developer. 7. Bulletin Board to be placed on restroom wall as agreed upon with the developer and management company. 8. Bicycle racks installed as agreed upon by the developer. 9. Drinking fountain installed as agreed upon by developer. 10. Swing set placed in tot lot as agreed upon by the developer. 11. Second swing set, as originally promised and then eliminated by developer, to be ordered and installed by the developer. 12. Basketball lines painted on the basketball court and basketball hoops installed. 13. Volleyball net installed at volleyball court. 14. Bases to be installed on softball field as per discussion with management company. 15. Restroom doors to have electronic coded locks with lever handle. Interior "panic bars" installed as per discussion with management company. 16. Barriers of dirt to be placed as agreed upon by developer and management company to prevent vehicle access to park interior. 17. Monument sign and other signs for the park posted as agreed upon by developer and management company. 18. All plans/changes requiring Town of Oro Valley approval be completed and accepted. 19. At least a one year warranty on park items/areas including structures, plants, sprinklers, access roads/paths and other items, including any city-approved modifications to retention/detention area. 20. Trash receptacles to be placed in designated areas as discussed with management company. (PRINT) NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE YLL i 6 A1q ,tes nrt.A._ /1/1. P (A, / Your Neighborhood 7 Park is nearing completion. The members of the Vistoso Community Association Park Advisory Committee have been working in the best interests to interface with the Vistoso Community Association, Developer and the Town of Oro Valley. Your help is needed to ensure a fully functional and safe park for our children. We, the undersigned, as residents of Rancho Vistoso, wish to go on record that we refuse acceptance of the Neighborhood 7 Park (Wildlife Ridge Park) from the Developer (Vistoso Partners, LLC) until it is completely finished and the following items are realized: 1. Retention/detention basin completed to the Town of Oro Valley's specification. This retention/detention area is a safety hazard to our children in its present state. We deem, as Members of the Vistoso Community Association, that this retention/detention area is an "attractive nuisance" and could adversely affect the health, safety, and welfare of our children and residents. 2. Black rubber matting safety material/handicap surface to be placed in tot lot area as promised by the developer. 3. The pay telephone moved from wall of restroom to a free-standing post as agreed upon with the developer and management company, for ADA accessibility. 4. The restroom and ramada painted light brown or tan to conform with the rest of the homes in the neighborhood. 5. Anti-graffiti solution applied on restroom and ramada once they are painted. 6. Park lights, with timers to be installed and in working order as promised by the developer. 7. Bulletin Board to be placed on restroom wall as agreed upon with the developer and management company. 8. Bicycle racks installed as agreed upon by the developer. 9. Drinking fountain installed as agreed upon by developer. 10. Swing set placed in tot lot as agreed upon by the developer. 11. Second swing set, as originally promised and then eliminated by developer, to be ordered and installed by the developer. 12. Basketball lines painted on the basketball court and basketball hoops installed. 13. Volleyball net installed at volleyball court. 14. Bases to be installed on softball field as per discussion with management company. 15. Restroom doors to have electronic coded locks with lever handle. Interior "panic bars" installed as per discussion with-management company. 16. Barriers of dirt to be placed as agreed upon by developer and management company to prevent vehicle access to park interior.% 17. Monument sign and other signs for the park posted as agreed upon by developer and management company. 18. All plans/changes requiring Town of Oro Valley approval be completed and accepted. 19. At least a one year warranty on park items/areas including structures, plants, sprinklers, access roads/paths and other items, including any city-approved modifications to retention/detention area. 20. Trash receptacles to be placed in designated areas as discussed with management company. (PRINT) NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE ar L_Atjczt. • Your Neighborhood 7 Park is nearing completion. The members of the Vistoso Community Association Park Advisory Committee have been working in the best interests to interface with the Vistoso Community Association, Developer and the Town of Oro Valley. Your help is needed to ensure a fully functional and safe park for our children. We, the undersigned, as residents of Rancho Vistoso, wish to go on record that we refuse acceptance of the Neighborhood 7 Park (Wildlife Ridge Park) from the Developer (Vistoso Partners, LLC) until it is completely finished and the following items are realized: 1. Retention/detention basin completed to the Town of Oro Valley's specification. This retention/detention area is a safety hazard to our children in its present state. We deem, as Members of the Vistoso Community Association, that this retention/detention area is an "attractive nuisance" and could adversely affect the health, safety, and welfare of our children and residents. 2. Black rubber matting safety material/handicap surface to be placed in tot lot area as promised by the developer. 3. The pay telephone moved from wall of restroom to a free-standing post as agreed upon with the developer and management company, for ADA accessibility. 4. The restroom and ramada painted light brown or tan to conform with the rest of the homes in the neighborhood. 5. Anti-graffiti solution applied on restroom and ramada once they are painted. 6. Park lights, with timers to be installed and in working order as promised by the developer. 7. Bulletin Board to be placed on restroom wall as agreed upon with the developer and management company. 8. Bicycle racks installed as agreed upon by the developer. 9. Drinking fountain installed as agreed upon by developer. 10. Swing set placed in tot lot as agreed upon by the developer. 11. Second swing set, as originally promised and then eliminated by developer, to be ordered and installed by the developer. 12. Basketball lines painted on the basketball court and basketball hoops installed. 13. Volleyball net installed at volleyball court. 14. Bases to be installed on softball field as per discussion with management company. 15. Restroom doors to have electronic coded locks with lever handle. Interior "panic bars" installed as per discussion with-management company. 16. Barriers of dirt to be placed as agreed upon by developer and management company to prevent vehicle access to park interior. 17. Monument sign and other signs for the park posted as agreed upon by developer and management company. 18. All plans/changes requiring Town of Oro Valley approval be completed and accepted. 19. At least a one year warranty on park items/areas including structures, plants, sprinklers, access roads/paths and other items, including any city-approved modifications to retention/detention area. 20. Trash receptacles to be placed in designated areas as discussed with management company. (PRINT) NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE k..V KUALt< ' • Your Neighborhood 7 Park is nearing completion. The members of the Vistoso Community Association Park Advisory Committee have been working in the best interests to interface L. with the Vistoso Community Association, Developer and the Town of Oro Valley. Your help is needed to ensure a fully functional and safe park for our children. We, the undersigned, as residents of Rancho Vistoso, wish to go on record that we refuse acceptance of the Neighborhood 7 Park (Wildlife Ridge Park) from the Developer (Vistoso Partners, LLC) until it is completely finished and the following items are realized: 1. Retention/detention basin completed to the Town of Oro Valley's specification. This retention/detention area is a safety hazard to our children in its present state. We deem, as Members of the Vistoso Community Association, that this retention/detention area is an "attractive nuisance" and could adversely affect the health, safety, and welfare of our children and residents. 2. Black rubber matting safety material/handicap surface to be placed in tot lot area as promised by the developer. 3. The pay telephone moved from wall of restroom to a free-standing post as agreed upon with the developer and management company, for ADA accessibility. 4. The restroom and ramada painted light brown or tan to conform with the rest of the homes in the neighborhood. 5. Anti-graffiti solution applied on restroom and ramada once they are painted. 6. Park lights, with timers to be installed and in working order as promised by the developer. 7. Bulletin Board to be placed on restroom wall as agreed upon with the developer and management company. 8. Bicycle racks installed as agreed upon by the developer. 9. Drinking fountain installed as agreed upon by developer. 10. Swing set placed in tot lot as agreed upon by the developer. 11. Second swing set, as originally promised and then eliminated by developer, to be ordered and installed by the developer. 12. Basketball lines painted on the basketball court and basketball hoops installed. 13. Volleyball net installed at volleyball court. 14. Bases to be installed on softball field as per discussion with management company. 15. Restroom doors to have electronic coded locks with lever handle. Interior "panic bars" installed as per discussion with-management company. 16. Barriers of dirt to be placed as agreed upon by developer and management company to prevent vehicle access to park interior. 17. Monument sign and other signs for the park posted as agreed upon by developer and management company. 18. All plans/changes requiring Town of Oro Valley approval be completed and accepted. 19. At least a one year warranty on park items/areas including structures, plants, sprinklers, access roads/paths and other items, including any city-approved modifications to retention/detention area. 20. Trash receptacles to be placed in designated areas as discussed with management company. (PRINT) NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE j PC,id St& /t. 1 f% (`�►' �� _ /fir!' ,,c.� .C/ Your Neighborhood 7 Park is nearing completion. The members of the Vistoso Community Association Park Advisory Committee have been working in the best interests to interface with the Vistoso Community Association, Developer and the Town of Oro Valley. Your help is needed to ensure a fully functional and safe park for our children. We, the undersigned, as residents of Rancho Vistoso, wish to go on record that we refuse acceptance of the Neighborhood 7 Park (Wildlife Ridge Park) from the Developer (Vistoso Partners, LLC) until it is completely finished and the following items are realized: 1. Retention/detention basin completed to the Town of Oro Valley's specification. This retention/detention area is a safety hazard to our children in its present state. We deem, as Members of the Vistoso Community Association, that this retention/detention area is an "attractive nuisance" and could adversely affect the health, safety, and welfare of our children and residents. 2. Black rubber matting safety material/handicap surface to be placed in tot lot area as promised by the developer. 3. The pay telephone moved from wall of restroom to a free-standing post as agreed upon with the developer and management company, for ADA accessibility. (4. The restroom and ramada painted light brown or tan to conform with the rest of the homes in the neighborhood. 5. Anti-graffiti solution applied on restroom and ramada once they are painted. 6. Park lights, with timers to be installed and in working order as promised by the developer. 7. Bulletin Board to be placed on restroom wall as agreed upon with the developer and management company. 8. Bicycle racks installed as agreed upon by the developer. 9. Drinking fountain installed as agreed upon by developer. 10. Swing set placed in tot lot as agreed upon by the developer. 11. Second swing set, as originally promised and then eliminated by developer, to be ordered and installed by the developer. 12. Basketball lines painted on the basketball court and basketball hoops installed. 13. Volleyball net installed at volleyball court. 14. Bases to be installed on softball field as per discussion with management company. 15. Restroom doors to have electronic coded locks with lever.handle. Interior "panic bars" installed as per discussion with management company. 16. Barriers of dirt to be placed as agreed upon by developer and management company to prevent vehicle access to park interior. 17. Monument sign and other signs for the park posted as agreed upon by developer and management company. . 18. All plans/changes requiring Town of Oro Valley approval be completed and accepted. 19. At least a one year warranty on park items/areas including structures, plants, sprinklers, access roads/paths and other items, including any city-approved modifications to retention/detention area. 20. Trash receptacles to be placed in designated areas as discussed with management company. (PRINT) NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE CY n \ilv4,ti 2V y�� 1.) �� i \CLv�,'r A 16 (VvN‘ C."vN LL1--1.-A -//1-"AC --1-1 4 (_e Your Neighborhood 7 Park is nearing completion. The members of the Vistoso Community Association Park Advisory Committee have been working in the best interests to interface with the Vistoso Community Association, Developer and the Town of Oro Valley. Your help is needed to ensure a fully functional and safe park for our children. We, the undersigned, as residents of Rancho Vistoso, wish to go on record that we refuse acceptance of the Neighborhood 7 Park (Wildlife Ridge Park) from the Developer (Vistoso Partners, LLC) until it is completely finished and the following items are realized: 1. Retention/detention basin completed to the Town of Oro Valley's specification. This retention/detention area is a safety hazard to our children in its present state. We deem, as Members of the Vistoso Community Association, that this retention/detention area is an "attractive nuisance" and could adversely affect the health, safety, and welfare of our children and residents. 2. Black rubber matting safety material/handicap surface to be placed in tot lot area as promised by the developer. __. ,The pay telephone moved from wall of restroom to a free-standing post as agreed upon with the developer and management company, for ADA accessibility. „ yl The restroom and ramada painted light brown or tan to conform with the rest of the homes in the neighborhood. 5. Anti-graffiti solution applied on restroom and ramada once they are painted. 6. Park lights, with timers to be installed and in working order as promised by the developer. 7. Bulletin Board to be placed on restroom wall as agreed upon with the developer and management company. 8. Bicycle racks installed as agreed upon by the developer. 9. Drinking fountain installed as agreed upon by developer. '� 10. Swing set placed in tot lot as agreed upon by the developer. 11. Second swing set, as originally promised and then eliminated by developer, to be ordered and installed by the developer. 12. Basketball lines painted on the basketball court and basketball hoops installed. 13. Volleyball net installed at volleyball court. 14. Bases to be installed on softball field as per discussion with management company. 15. Restroom doors to have electronic coded locks with lever handle. Interior "panic bars" installed as per discussion with management company. 16. Barriers of dirt to be placed as agreed upon by developer and management company to prevent vehicle access to park interior. 17. Monument sign and other signs for the park posted as agreed upon by developer and management company. 18. All plans/changes requiring Town of Oro Valley approval be completed and accepted. 19. At least a one year warranty on park items/areas including structures, plants, sprinklers, access roads/paths and other items, including any city-approved modifications to retention/detention area. 20. Trash receptacles to be placed in designated areas as discussed with management company. (PRINT) NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE ?Oh / -. '( A v • Your Neighborhood 7 Park is nearing completion. The members of the Vistoso Community Association Park Advisory Committee have been working in the best interests to interface with the Vistoso Community Association, Developer and the Town of Oro Valley. Your help is needed to ensure a fully functional and safe park for our children. We, the undersigned, as residents of Rancho Vistoso, wish to go on record that we refuse acceptance of the Neighborhood 7 Park (Wildlife Ridge Park) from the Developer (Vistoso Partners, LLC) until it is completely finished and the following items are realized: 1. Retention/detention basin completed to the Town of Oro Valley's specification. This retention/detention area is a safety hazard to our children in its present state. We deem, as Members of the Vistoso Community Association, that this retention/detention area is an "attractive nuisance" and could adversely affect the health, safety, and welfare of our children and residents. 2. Black rubber matting safety material/handicap surface to be placed in tot lot area as promised by the developer. 3. The pay telephone moved from wall of restroom to a free-standing post as agreed upon with the developer and management company, for ADA accessibility. 4. The restroom and ramada painted light brown or tan to conform with the rest of the homes in the neighborhood. 5. Anti-graffiti solution applied on restroom and ramada once they are painted. 6. Park lights, with timers to be installed and in working order as promised by the developer. 7. Bulletin Board to be placed on restroom wall as agreed upon with the developer and management company. 8. Bicycle racks installed as agreed upon by the developer. 9. Drinking fountain installed as agreed upon by developer. 10. Swing set placed in tot lot as agreed upon by the developer. 11. Second swing set, as originally promised and then eliminated by developer, to be ordered and installed by the developer. 12. Basketball lines painted on the basketball court and basketball hoops installed. 13. Volleyball net installed at volleyball court. 14. Bases to be installed on softball field as per discussion with management company. 15. Restroom doors to have electronic coded locks with lever handle. Interior "panic bars" installed as per discussion with management company. 16. Barriers of dirt to be placed as agreed upon by developer and management company to prevent vehicle access to park interior. 17. Monument sign and other signs for the park posted as agreed upon by developer and management company. 18. All plans/changes requiring Town of Oro Valley approval be completed and accepted. 19. At least a one year warranty on park items/areas including structures, plants, sprinklers, access roads/paths and other items, including any city-approved modifications to retention/detention area. 20. Trash receptacles to be placed in designated areas as discussed with management company. (PRINT) NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE 7c,Lkij C d/)..: ,\ /( EGG' ,ram 4-1,,,,,: E Your Neighborhood 7 Park is nearing completion. The members of the Vistoso Community Association Park Advisory Committee have been working in the best interests to interface with the Vistoso Community Association, Developer and the Town of Oro Valley. Your help is needed to ensure a fully functional and safe park for our children. We, the undersigned, as residents of Rancho Vistoso, wish to go on record that we refuse acceptance of the Neighborhood 7 Park (Wildlife Ridge Park) from the Developer (Vistoso Partners, LLC) until it is completely finished and the following items are realized: 1. Retention/detention basin completed to the Town of Oro Valley's specification. This retention/detention area is a safety hazard to our children in its present state. We deem, as Members of the Vistoso Community Association, that this retention/detention area is an "attractive nuisance" and could adversely affect the health, safety, and welfare of our children and residents. 2. Black rubber matting safety material/handicap surface to be placed in tot lot area as promised by the developer. 3. The pay telephone moved from wall of restroom to a free-standing post as agreed upon with the developer and management company, for ADA accessibility. 4. The restroom and ramada painted light brown or tan to conform with the rest of the homes in the neighborhood. 5. Anti-graffiti solution applied on restroom and ramada once they are painted. 6. Park lights, with timers to be installed and in working order as promised by the developer. 7. Bulletin Board to be placed on restroom wall as agreed upon with the developer and management company. 8. Bicycle racks installed as agreed upon by the developer. 9. Drinking fountain installed as agreed upon by developer. 10. Swing set placed in tot lot as agreed upon by the developer. 11. Second swing set, as originally promised and then eliminated by developer, to be ordered and installed by the developer. 12. Basketball lines painted on the basketball court and basketball hoops installed. 13. Volleyball net installed at volleyball court. 14. Bases to be installed on softball field as per discussion with management company. 15. Restroom doors to have electronic coded locks with lever handle. Interior "panic bars" installed as per discussion with management company. 16. Barriers of dirt to be placed as agreed upon by developer and management company to prevent vehicle access to park interior. 17. Monument sign and other signs for the park posted as agreed upon by developer and management company. 18. All plans/changes requiring Town of Oro Valley approval be completed and accepted. 19. At least a one year warranty on park items/areas including structures, plants, sprinklers, access roads/paths and other items, including any city-approved modifications to retention/detention area. 20. Trash receptacles to be placed in designated areas as discussed with management company. (PRINT) NAME ADDRESS _ IGNATURE (. <75(1-d ,lig) \ ? ,,,,- i: / Your Neighborhood 7 Park is nearing completion. The members of the Vistoso Community Association Park Advisory Committee have been working in the best interests to interface with the Vistoso Community Association, Developer and the Town of Oro Valley. Your help is needed to ensure a fully functional and safe park for our children. We, the undersigned, as residents of Rancho Vistoso, wish to go on record that we refuse acceptance of the Neighborhood 7 Park (Wildlife Ridge Park) from the Developer (Vistoso Partners, LLC) until it is completely finished and the following items are realized: 1. Retention/detention basin completed to the Town of Oro Valley's specification. This retention/detention area is a safety hazard to our children in its present state. We deem, as Members of the Vistoso Community Association, that this retention/detention area is an "attractive nuisance" and could adversely affect the health, safety, and welfare of our children and residents. 2. Black rubber matting safety material/handicap surface to be placed in tot lot area as promised by the developer. 3. The pay telephone moved from wall of restroom to a free-standing post as agreed upon with the developer and management company, for ADA accessibility. 4. The restroom and ramada painted light brown or tan to conform with the rest of the homes in the neighborhood. 5. Anti-graffiti solution applied on restroom and ramada once they are painted. 6. Park lights, with timers to be installed and in working order as promised by the developer. 7. Bulletin Board to be placed on restroom wall as agreed upon with the developer and management company. 8. Bicycle racks installed as agreed upon by the developer. 9. Drinking fountain installed as agreed upon by developer. 10. Swing set placed in tot lot as agreed upon by the developer. 11. Second swing set, as originally promised and then eliminated by developer, to be ordered and installed by the developer. 12. Basketball lines painted on the basketball court and basketball hoops installed. 13. Volleyball net installed at volleyball court. 14. Bases to be installed on softball field as per discussion with management company. 15. Restroom doors to have electronic coded locks with lever handle. Interior "panic bars" installed as per discussion with-management company. 16. Barriers of dirt to be placed as agreed upon by developer and management company to prevent vehicle access to park interior. 17. Monument sign and other signs for the park posted as agreed upon by developer and management company. 18. All plans/changes requiring Town of Oro Valley approval be completed and accepted. 19. At least a one year warranty on park items/areas including structures, plants, sprinklers, access roads/paths and other items, including any city-approved modifications to retention/detention area. 20. Trash receptacles to be placed in designated areas as discussed with management company. (PRINT) NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE SiJo-kaStu4 GOa l/ce--- / Your Neighborhood 7 Park is nearing completion. The members of the Vistoso Community Association Park Advisory Committee have been working in the best interests to interface with the Vistoso Community Association, Developer and the Town of Oro Valley. Your help is needed to ensure a fully functional and safe park for our children. We, the undersigned, as residents of Rancho Vistoso, wish to go on record that we refuse acceptance of the Neighborhood 7 Park (Wildlife Ridge Park) from the Developer (Vistoso Partners, LLC) until it is completely finished and the following items are realized: 1. Retention/detention basin completed to the Town of Oro Valley's specification. This retention/detention area is a safety hazard to our children in its present state. We deem, as Members of the Vistoso Community Association, that this retention/detention area is an "attractive nuisance" and could adversely affect the health, safety, and welfare of our children and residents. 2. Black rubber matting safety material/handicap surface to be placed in tot lot area as promised by the developer. 3. The pay telephone moved from wall of restroom to a free-standing post as agreed upon with the developer and management company, for ADA accessibility. 4. The restroom and ramada painted light brown or tan to conform with the rest of the homes in the neighborhood. 5. Anti-graffiti solution applied on restroom and ramada once they are painted. 6. Park lights, with timers to be installed and in working order as promised by the developer. 7. Bulletin Board to be placed on restroom wall as agreed upon with the developer and management company. 8. Bicycle racks installed as agreed upon by the developer. 9. Drinking fountain installed as agreed upon by developer. 10. Swing set placed in tot lot as agreed upon by the developer. 11. Second swing set, as originally promised and then eliminated by developer, to be ordered and installed by the developer. 12. Basketball lines painted on the basketball court and basketball hoops installed. 13. Volleyball net installed at volleyball court. 14. Bases to be installed on softball field as per discussion with management company. 15. Restroom doors to have electronic coded locks with lever handle. Interior "panic bars" installed as per discussion with-management company. 16. Barriers of dirt to be placed as agreed upon by developer and management company to prevent vehicle access to park interior. 17. Monument sign and other signs for the park posted as agreed upon by developer and management company. 18. All plans/changes requiring Town of Oro Valley approval be completed and accepted. 19. At least a one year warranty on park items/areas including structures, plants, sprinklers, access roads/paths and other items, including any city-approved modifications to retention/detention area. 20. Trash receptacles to be placed in designated areas as discussed with management company. (PRINT) NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE D\\e-T e-t._ Your Neighborhood 7 Park is nearing completion. The members of the Vistoso Community Association Park Advisory Committee have been working in the best interests to interface with the Vistoso Community Association, Developer and the Town of Oro Valley. Your help is needed to ensure a fully functional and safe park for our children. We, the undersigned, as residents of Rancho Vistoso, wish to go on record that we refuse acceptance of the Neighborhood 7 Park (Wildlife Ridge Park) from the Developer (Vistoso Partners, LLC) until it is completely finished and the following items are realized: 1. Retention/detention basin completed to the Town of Oro Valley's specification. This retention/detention area is a safety hazard to our children in its present state. We deem, as Members of the Vistoso Community Association, that this retention/detention area is an "attractive nuisance" and could adversely affect the health, safety, and welfare of our children and residents. 2. Black rubber matting safety material/handicap surface to be placed in tot lot area as promised by the developer. 3. The pay telephone moved from wall of restroom to a free-standing post as agreed upon with the developer and management company, for ADA accessibility. 4. The restroom and ramada painted light brown or tan to conform with the rest of the homes in the neighborhood. 5. Anti-graffiti solution applied on restroom and ramada once they are painted. 6. Park lights, with timers to be installed and in working order as promised by the developer. 7. Bulletin Board to be placed on restroom wall as agreed upon with the developer and management company. 8. Bicycle racks installed as agreed upon by the developer. 9. Drinking fountain installed as agreed upon by developer. 10. Swing set placed in tot lot as agreed upon by the developer. 11. Second swing set, as originally promised and then eliminated by developer, to be ordered and installed by the developer. 12. Basketball lines painted on the basketball court and basketball hoops installed. 13. Volleyball net installed at volleyball court. 14. Bases to be installed on softball field as per discussion with management company. 15. Restroom doors to have electronic coded locks with lever handle. Interior "panic bars" installed as per discussion with-management company. 16. Barriers of dirt to be placed as agreed upon by developer and management company to prevent vehicle access to park interior. 17. Monument sign and other signs for the park posted as agreed upon by developer and management company. 18. All plans/changes requiring Town of Oro Valley approval be completed and accepted. 19. At least a one year warranty on park items/areas including structures, plants, sprinklers, access roads/paths and other items, including any city-approved modifications to retention/detention area. 20. Trash receptacles to be placed in designated areas as discussed with management company. (PRINT) NAME / vQ.-DCut-A Your Neighborhood 7 Park is nearing completion. The members of the Vistoso Communit y Association Park Advisory Committee have been working in the best interests to interface with the Vistoso Community Association, Developer and the Town of Oro Valley. Your help is needed to ensure a fully functional and safe park for our children. We, the undersigned, as residents of Rancho Vistoso, wish to go on record that we refuse acceptance of the Neighborhood 7 Park (Wildlife Ridge Park) from the Developer (Vistoso Partners, LLC) until it is completely finished and the following items are realized: 1. Retention/detention basin completed to the Town of Oro Valley's specification. This retention/detention area is a safety hazard to our children in its present state. We deem, as Members of the Vistoso Community Association, that this retention/detention area is an "attractive nuisance" and could adversely affect the health, safety, and welfare of our children and residents. 2. Black rubber matting safety material/handicap surface to be placed in tot lot area as promised by the developer. 3. The pay telephone moved from wall of restroom to a free-standing post as agreed upon with the developer and management company, for ADA accessibility. 4. The restroom and ramada painted light brown or tan to conform with the rest of the homes in.the neighborhood. 5. Anti-graffiti solution applied on restroom and ramada once they are painted. 6. Park lights, with timers to be installed and in working order as promised by the developer. 7. Bulletin Board to be placed on restroom wall as agreed upon with the developer and management company. 8. Bicycle racks installed as agreed upon by the developer. 9. Drinking fountain installed as agreed upon by developer. 10. Swing set placed in tot lot as agreed upon by the developer. 11. Second swing set, as originally promised and then eliminated by developer, to be ordered and installed by the developer. 12. Basketball lines painted on the basketball court and basketball hoops installed. 13. Volleyball net installed at volleyball court. 14. Bases to be installed on softball field as per discussion with management company. 15. Restroom doors to have electronic coded locks with lever handle. Interior "panic bars" installed as per discussion with-management company. 16. Barriers of dirt to be placed as agreed upon by developer and management company to prevent vehicle access to park interior. 17. Monument sign and other signs for the park posted as agreed upon by developer and management company. 18. All plans/changes requiring Town of Oro Valley approval be completed and accepted. 19. At least a one year warranty on park items/areas including structures, plants, sprinklers, access roads/paths and other items, including any city-approved modifications to retention/detention area. 20. Trash receptacles to be placed in designated areas as discussed with management company. (PRINT) NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE /-/A/1 , .Y Your Neighborhood 7 Park is nearing completion. The members of the Vistoso Community Association Park Advisory Committee have been working in the best interests to interface with the Vistoso Community Association, Developer and the Town of Oro Valley. Your help is needed to ensure a fully functional and safe park for our children. We, the undersigned, as residents of Rancho Vistoso, wish to go on record that we refuse acceptance of the Neighborhood 7 Park (Wildlife Ridge Park) from the Developer (Vistoso Partners, LLC) until it is completely finished and the following items are realized: 1. Retention/detention basin completed to the Town of Oro Valley's specification. This retention/detention area is a safety hazard to our children in its present state. We deem, as Members of the Vistoso Community Association, that this retention/detention area is an "attractive nuisance" and could adversely affect the health, safety, and welfare of our children and residents. 2. Black rubber matting safety material/handicap surface to be placed in tot lot area as promised by the developer. 3. The pay telephone moved from wall of restroom to a free-standing post as agreed upon with the developer and management company, for ADA accessibility. 4. The restroom and ramada painted light brown or tan to conform with the rest of the homes in the neighborhood. 5. Anti-graffiti solution applied on restroom and ramada once they are painted. 6. Park lights, with timers to be installed and in working order as promised by the developer. 7. Bulletin Board to be placed on restroom wall as agreed upon with the developer and management company. 8. Bicycle racks installed as agreed upon by the developer. 9. Drinking fountain installed as agreed upon by developer. 10. Swing set placed in tot lot as agreed upon by the developer. 11. Second swing set, as originally promised and then eliminated by developer, to be ordered and installed by the developer. 12. Basketball lines painted on the basketball court and basketball hoops installed. 13. Volleyball net installed at volleyball court. 14. Bases to be installed on softball field as per discussion with management company. 15. Restroom doors to have electronic coded locks with lever handle. Interior "panic bars" installed as per discussion with management company. 16. Barriers of dirt to be placed as agreed upon by developer and management company to prevent vehicle access to park interior. 17. Monument sign and other signs for the park posted as agreed upon by developer and management company. 18. All plans/changes requiring Town of Oro Valley approval be completed and accepted. 19. At least a one year warranty on park items/areas including structures, plants, sprinklers, access roads/paths and other items, including any city-approved modifications to retention/detention area. 20. Trash receptacles to be placed in designated areas as discussed with management company. (PRINT) NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE __.____._:_z PA/tliva ..)-rt. (0 I D< /",,�n>;,, 12044,M_/-4r1-ram ILOUI'vd/.1 _ c . Your Neighborhood 7 Park is nearing completion. The members of the Vistoso Community Association Park Advisory Committee have been working in the best interests to interface with the Vistoso Community Association, Developer and the Town of Oro Valley. Your help is needed to ensure a fully functional and safe park for our children. We, the undersigned, as residents of Rancho Vistoso, wish to go on record that we refuse acceptance of the Neighborhood 7 Park (Wildlife Ridge Park) from the Developer (Vistoso Partners, LLC) until it is completely finished and the following items are realized: 1. Retention/detention basin completed to the Town of Oro Valley's specification. This retention/detention area is a safety hazard to our children in its present state. We deem, as Members of the Vistoso Community Association, that this retention/detention area is an "attractive nuisance" and could adversely affect the health, safety, and welfare of our children and residents. 2. Black rubber matting safety material/handicap surface to be placed in tot lot area as promised by the developer. 3. The pay telephone moved from wall of restroom to a free-standing post as agreed upon with the developer and management company, for ADA accessibility. 4. The restroom and ramada painted light brown or tan to conform with the rest of the homes in.the neighborhood. 5. Anti-graffiti solution applied on restroom and ramada once they are painted. 6. Park lights, with timers to be installed and in working order as promised by the developer. 7. Bulletin Board to be placed on restroom wall as agreed upon with the developer and management company. 8. Bicycle racks installed as agreed upon by the developer. 9. Drinking fountain installed as agreed upon by developer. 10. Swing set placed in tot lot as agreed upon by the developer. 11. Second swing set, as originally promised and then eliminated by developer, to be ordered and installed by the developer. 12. Basketball lines painted on the basketball court and basketball hoops installed. 13. Volleyball net installed at volleyball court. 14. Bases to be installed on softball field as per discussion with management company. 15. Restroom doors to have electronic coded locks with lever handle. Interior "panic bars" installed as per discussion with-management company. 16. Barriers of dirt to be placed as agreed upon by developer and management company to prevent vehicle access to park interior. 17. Monument sign and other signs for the park posted as agreed upon by developer and management company. 18. All plans/changes requiring Town of Oro Valley approval be completed and accepted. 19. At least a one year warranty on park items/areas including structures, plants, sprinklers, access roads/paths and other items, including any city-approved modifications to retention/detention area. 20. Trash receptacles to be placed in designated areas as discussed with management company. (PRINT) NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE r1 ( �, / f )�y C' Your Neighborhood 7 Park is nearing completion. The members of the Vistoso Community Association Park Advisory Committee have been working in the best interests to interface with the Vistoso Community Association, Developer and the Town of Oro Valley. Your help is needed to ensure a fully functional and safe park for our children. We, the undersigned, as residents of Rancho Vistoso, wish to go on record that we refuse acceptance of the Neighborhood 7 Park (Wildlife Ridge Park) from the Developer (Vistoso Partners, LLC) until it is completely finished and the following items are realized: 1. Retention/detention basin completed to the Town of Oro Valley's specification. This retention/detention area is a safety hazard to our children in its present state. We deem, as Members of the Vistoso Community Association, that this retention/detention area is an "attractive nuisance" and could adversely affect the health, safety, and welfare of our children and residents. 2. Black rubber matting safety material/handicap surface to be placed in tot lot area as promised by the developer. sit I- (1 1:a,� - 3. The pay telephone moved from wall of restroom to a free-standing post as agreed upoli with the developer and management company, for ADA accessibility. 4.) The restroom and ramada painted light brown or tan to conform with the rest of the homes in the neighborhood. ) u v 3 %(441 5. Anti-graffiti solution applied on restroom and ramada once they are painted. 6. Park lights, with timers to be installed and in working order as promised by the developer. 7. Bulletin Board to be placed on restroom wall as agreed upon with the developer and management company. 8. Bicycle racks installed as agreed upon by the developer. 9. Drinking fountain installed as agreed upon by developer. 10. Swing set placed in tot lot as agreed upon by the developer. 11. Second swing set, as originally promised and then eliminated by developer, to be ordered and installed by the developer. ,,y 12. Basketball lines painted on the basketball court and basketball hoops installedri- 13. Volleyball net installed at volleyball court. 14. Bases to be installed on softball field as per discussion with management company. 15. Restroom doors to have electronic ode locks with lever handle. Interior "panic bars" installed as per isc ssion it -management company. 16. Barriers of dirt to be placed as agreed upon by developer and management company to prevent vehicle access to park interior. 17. Monument sign and other signs for the park posted as agreed upon by developer and management company. 18. All plans/changes requiring Town of Oro Valley approval be completed and accepted. 19. At least a one year warranty on park items/areas including structures, plants, sprinklers, access roads/paths and other items, including any city-approved modifications to retention/detention area. 20. Trash receptacles to be placed in designated areas as discussed with management company. (PRINT) NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE ) • ) c_ /--4"A r L l 1� llgi) , Your Neighborhood 7 Park is nearing completion. The members of the Vistoso Community Association Park Advisory Committee have been working in the best interests to interface with the Vistoso Community Association, Developer and the Town of Oro Valley. Your help is needed to ensure a fully functional and safe park for our children. We, the undersigned, as residents of Rancho Vistoso, wish to go on record that we refuse acceptance of the Neighborhood 7 Park (Wildlife Ridge Park) from the Developer (Vistoso Partners, LLC) until it is completely finished and the following items are realized: 1. Retention/detention basin completed to the Town of Oro Valley's specification. This retention/detention area is a safety hazard to our children in its present state. We deem, as Members of the Vistoso Community Association, that this retention/detention area is an "attractive nuisance" and could adversely affect the health, safety, and welfare of our children and residents. 2. Black rubber matting safety material/handicap surface to be placed in tot lot area as promised by the developer. 3. The pay telephone moved from wall of restroom to a free-standing post as agreed upon with the developer and management company, for ADA accessibility. 4. The restroom and ramada painted light brown or tan to conform with the rest of the homes in the neighborhood. 5. Anti-graffiti solution applied on restroom and ramada once they are painted. 6. Park lights, with timers to be installed and in working order as promised by the developer. 7. Bulletin Board to be placed on restroom wall as agreed upon with the developer and management company. 8. Bicycle racks installed as agreed upon by the developer. 9. Drinking fountain installed as agreed upon by developer. 10. Swing set placed in tot lot as agreed upon by the developer. 11. Second swing set, as originally promised and then eliminated by developer, to be ordered and installed by the developer. 12. Basketball lines painted on the basketball court and basketball hoops installed. 13. Volleyball net installed at volleyball court. 14. Bases to be installed on softball field as per discussion with management company. 15. Restroom doors to have electronic coded locks with lever handle. interior "panic bars" installed as per discussion with management company. 16. Barriers of dirt to be placed as agreed upon by developer and management company to prevent vehicle access to park interior. 17. Monument sign and other signs for the park posted as agreed upon by developer and management company. 18. All plans/changes requiring Town of Oro Valley approval be completed and accepted. 19. At least a one year warranty on park items/areas including structures, plants, sprinklers, access roads/paths and other items, including any city-approved modifications to retention/detention area. 20. Trash receptacles to be placed in designated areas as discussed with management company. (PRINT) NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE I' ' f' ry ilt/ tile oz/ i?'� , DEC-22-94 THU 15:34 NATIONAL RANK OF ARIZONA FAX NO, 6027906764 P. 02 326617-1 • . Account No, • • TIME DEPOSIT RECEIPT _�: Nationalk • Term _ .•-7 days - _ _ _ i; --• -:Member PpIC THIS CERTIFIES THAT THERE HAS BEEN DEPOSITED IN THE ACCOUNT OF: �•' * * *VISTQSO PARTNERS, L.I,.C. -..,� -�•.� ��'�•r 5861 S. Kyrene Rd. • Suite 1 .: Tempe,- Az 85283 ASSIGNEDT_.TO ._TOATN• ;OF Oita VALLEY .-. •. 6eN or EIN INTEREST RATE INTEREST PAYABLE ISSUE DATE MATURITY DATE AMOUNT DEPOSITED 86-0746884 4.2 • annPef ever •um y day 3 "1,2/1�2/9 4 Auto Ren $ 3 0 0 , 0 0 0.0 0** • . For information regarding your account.please refer to Depositors Agreement. DEPOSIT INTEREST TO ACCOUNT' 044AIL INTGRE:T CIICCK DO INTEREST TO PRINCIPAL BANK CONTROL COPY • This is a true and cO1rfied c0 py of the original document Nano al B of Arizonit By '1 -o Title %C. Q. Y • . • � .. •.ice _i4• \LI it Date: January 10, 1997 TO: Don Chatfield, Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Manuel Padilla, Zoning Inspector RE: RV NEIGHBORHOOD 7 RECREATIONAL FACILITY COMPLIANCE INSPECTION This memo is in response to Chuck Sweet's memo dated January 8, 1997. The following items are a requirement of the approved development plan and under the responsibility of the Planning and Zoning department to monitor for compliance. As of December 20, 1996, these items were not in compliance. Mr. Jim Dawson, a representative of Vistoso Partners met with me on December 20, 1997 for an on-site compliance inspection of the park. Jim and I finished our inspection with the understanding that items not in compliance would have to brought into compliance or a revised development plan submitted to the Town for review. He said he put together a revised development plan and submit to the Town. The last communication on this matter with Jim Dawson was on December 24, 1996 and he indicated he was still working on the revisions and would submit them later. In reference to Ms. Abbott's list of items not in compliance, the following are under Planning & Zoning requirements: * No lines on BB court = Required on sheet L-5,9 of the development plan. * Trash cans sb concrete = Required on sheet L-5,9 of the development plan. 5r Also, apart from the issues raised by Ms. Abbott, the attached memo dated , 1996 indicates items found not in compliance on December 20, 1996 and have not been approved by the Town. 1 MEMORANDUM TO: DON CHATFIELD, PLANNING DIRECTOR FROM: CHUCK SWEET, TOWN MANAGER DATE: JANUARY 8TH, 1997 SUBJ: PAULA ABBOTT PHONE CONVERSATION I talked with Paula Abbott yesterday regarding her concerns about what is left to be finished with the Vistoso Neighborhood Park in Unit #7 . As a member of the Association Parks Advisory group, she wanted to make sure that the Town still understood their position, especially as their position relates to the detention pond. Their position as stated before is still that it should not function with a electrical pump. I have shared that information with David Hook and asked him to speak with his staff about this matter and where we are at on resolving it with Vistoso Partners . Personally, I don' t think the town should settle for anything less than a retention/detention pond that functions as it was approved - with a gravity flow outlet . Paula Abbott also mentioned this "Grand Opening" event that she understood was expected to take place in the next couple of weeks . I informed her that Town was concerned that the park was still unfinished, the detention pond was unresolved, yet people were using the park! I think we need to make some noise on this situation and get a letter off to Mr. Maes regarding the Town' s position on this park. Please see me regarding this matter. Also, at the end of the conversation Paula Abbott shared with me the following items that they feel are yet to be completed by Vistoso Partners : • No Timer for Lights on BB court • No lines on BB court • Parking Lot lights not working • Timer in the Restr oms • Number lock on Women RR broken • Swing Set missing • Partition missing in RR • Trash Cans sb concrete • ADA entrance to Tot Lot missing • Bases for Softball missing • Berm by BB court needed • No ADA access to BB court • 3-WAY STOP AT ARROWSMITH &. WOODBURNE ? I share the above list with you in case some of these items are also a requirement of the town' s inspection of this project . Talk with you later about this project . Chuck Sweet, Town Manager 4 Date: December 5, 1996 TO: Richard Maes, Rancho Vistoso Partners VIA: Don Chatfield, Planning and Zoning Director, AICP FROM: Manuel Padilla, Zoning Inspector RE: RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 7, PARCEL G, RECREATIONAL PARK, COMPLIANCE INSPECTION A compliance inspection by the Town of Oro Valley was conducted on November 26, 1996 and found the following requirements not in compliance, they were either in progress or not in place at the park. Landscape requirements: 1. No hydro-seeding in place, Retention basin area required by plan to by hydro-seeded. 2. Trees between baseball field and retention basin not completed, in progress. 3. Retention basin berm not in place as per page L-2 of landscape plan. Requires riprap to be placed on both sides of berm with top soil on top and hydro-seeded. Currently riprap on outside only, no top soil or hydro-seed. 4. Pedestrian trail not completed as required on landscape plan. In some places the trail is in place with DG and then stops, no indication where the trail will pick up again. Also, pedestrian trail is being constructed east of the baseball field, in the natural area and goes through the sandy bottom of the wash. 5. Picnic areas are in place, with the required picnic tables and barbecue grills, but no trash containers as required by the landscape plan are in place on any of the four picnic areas. r Park compliance inspection page 2 6. Bike racks are not designed as shown on page L-8 of the landscape plan. Also, the bike racks (two) on site are portable and not anchored as per plan to concrete. 7. Three feet wrought iron fence around sand tot lot not in place. 8. Niche lights for ramada are not as shown on plan, but are located inside the ramada, in the ceiling area. 9. Park lights for; parking area, sand tot lot, basketball court, pedestrian trail, volleyball court, and bathrooms not in place. First poles were being installed on November 26, 1996. Grading/paving requirements: 1. Seat walls as shown on grading plan are not in place. This seat walls were to be located adjacent [northern side] to the bathrooms and a second seat wall that was to be located just west of baseball back stop. 2. Retaining wall between Woodburne Ave and the parking area not installed. Sheet 3 of the grading plan shows a berm toward Woodburne Ave., and a 36" retaining wall facing the parking area. Instead of a retaining wall, there is a berm only between Woodburne Ave and parking area. 3. A underground drain pipe is shown on the grading plans to be installed from Woodburne Ave [underneath the entrance to the parking area], passes just north of the ramada and drains into the retention basin. On-site, this underground drain pipe has be installed at Woodburne Ave at a point between the tot lot and the basket ball court, goes underneath directly east and drains into the retention basin. This drain pipe from Woodburne Ave was installed in an area that is outside the approved grading limits of the grading plan. 4. Ramps required on two handicap parking spaces may not be in place. Temporary fill is being used in this area to provide access to small loader into park area. Handicap spaces in place with sidewalk from spaces to ramada and bathroom. Ramps needed from parking space onto sidewalk may be buried underneath temporary ramp. 5. Handrail between pedestrian trail and steep slope behind baseball back stop not in place. 6. Access [sidewalk] in place from park, north along Woodburne Ave to Arrowsmith Drive, no curb or paving on Woodburne Ave. No sidewalk or paving on Woodburne Ave south of park. ��EY qR 0 ry TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE f* 1� ORO VALLEY ARIZONA 85737 s w Administrative Offices(520)297-2591 Fax(520)297-0428 SUNDEO\ January 14, 1997 Mr. Dick Maes Vistoso Partners 5 861 S. Kyrene Rd Tempe AZ 85283 RE: Recreation Area Completion, Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 7 Dear Mr, Maes: During late 1996, staff members from the Town's Planning and Zoning Department and Department of Public Works completed inspections of the current state of improvements at the Recreation Area in Neighborhood 7 of Rancho Vistoso. According to our records, the following items remain to be completed: Retention Pond 1. The outlet pipe structure from Woodburne Avenue is installed. The invert of the outlet is at the bottom of the retention pond rather than 2.5 feet above at the same elevation as the proposed bleeder pipe. I am concerned about the potential for ponding on Woodburne Avenue. 2. All sideslopes appear to be steeper than 3:1. The retention pond shall be constructed to meet all Pima County/City of Tucson Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual construction and safety standards for a multi-use retention pond. 3. No erosion control or aesthetic treatment has been applied to the inside slopes of the retention pond. 4. The filter fabric under the riprap on the outside of the berm/weir is not keyed into anything. It appears that there is a good opportunity for erosion under the fabric when the weir is overtopped. 5. The bleeder pipe has not yet been installed. If the bleeder pipe is installed into the riparian area east of the retention pond, a Riparian Area Mitigation Plan will be required. This plan must he considered by both the Development Review Board and the Town Council. ry Mr. Dick Maes Neighborhood 7 Recreation Area Page Two 6. The retention pond appears to be 7 to 8 feet deep, yet the approved plan calls for the depth of the pond to be no more than 5 feet. 7. There is evidence of ponding within the wash/riparian way easterly of the pond. The ponding appears to have been created by the subgrade for Woodburne. At a minimum, a temporary bleeder pipe of sufficient size shall be installed to allow the wash to drain. 8. We have not received any information indicating a percolation rate test has been done for the pond bottom. We will require a copy of the percolation test results for our files. Landscape Installation 1. No hydro-seeding is in place. The retention basin area is required by plan to be hydroseeded. 2. The trees between the baseball field and retention basin have not been installed. 3. The retention basin berm is not in place as per page L-2 of the landscape plan. The plan requires riprap to be placed on both sides of the berm with topsoil on top and hydroseeded. There is currently riprap on the outside only, with no topsoil or hydroseed. 4. The pedestrian trail is not completed as required on the landscape plan. In some places the trail is in place with DG and then stops, no indication where the trail will pick up again. Also, a pedestrian trail is being constructed east of the baseball field, in the natural area and goes through the sandy bottom of the wash. 5. The four picnic areas are in place, with the required picnic tables and barbecue grills. None of the trash containers have been provided at these areas, as required by the landscape plan. 6. The bike racks are not designed as shown on page L-8 of the landscape plan. Also, the bike racks (two) on site are portable and not anchored as per plan to concrete. 7. The three (3) foot wrought iron fence around the sand tot lot has not been installed. 8. Recreation area lights for the following area are not in place: • parking area, • sand tot lot, • basketball court, • pedestrian trail, Mr. Dick Maes Neighborhood 7 Recreation Area Page Three • volleyball court, and • bathrooms. Grading and Paving Requirements 1. The seat walls as shown on the approved grading plan are not in place. These seat walls were to be located adjacent [northern side] to the bathrooms and a second seat wall that was to be located just west of the baseball back stop. 2. The retaining wall between Woodburne Avenue and the parking area has not been installed. Sheet 3 of the approved grading plan shows a berm toward Woodburne Avenue, and a 36" retaining wall facing the parking area. Instead of a retaining wall, there is a berm only between Woodburne Avenue and the parking area. 3. An underground drain pipe is shown on the grading plans to be installed from Woodburne Avenue, passing just north of the ramada and draining into the retention basin. On-site, this underground drain pipe has been installed at Woodburne Avenue at a point between the tot lot and the basketball court. The installed pipe goes underground in an easterly direction and drains into the retention basin. This drain pipe from Woodburne Avenue was installed in an area that is outside the approved grading limits of the grading plan. 4. The ramps required on the two handicap parking spaces may not be in place. Temporary fill is being used in this area to provide access for a small loader into the recreation area. Handicap spaces are in place with a sidewalk from the spaces to the ramada and bathroom area. Ramps are needed from the parking space onto the sidewalk. These may be buried underneath the temporary ramp. 5. The handrail between the pedestrian trail and the steep slope behind the baseball backstop is not in place. 6. An access sidewalk is in place from the recreation area, north along Woodburne Ave to Arrowsmith Drive. No curbing or paving has been provided on Woodburne Avenue. No sidewalk or paving has been provided on Woodburne Avenue south of the recreation area. Per prior approval by the Department of Public Works, at a minimum, a stabilized gravel surface must be applied to Woodburne Avenue and appropriate signage must be installed. Per Council action, and agreement by Vistoso Partners, this recreation area facility was scheduled for completion on November 20, 1996. We are now approaching two months beyond that deadline date, with a substantial number of items to be completed. Mr. Dick Maes Neighborhood 7 Recreation Area Page Four The Town of Oro Valley will require a final inspection on Friday, January 31, 1997. If the above items are not satisfactorily resolved by that point in time, the following action will be taken: 1. No further building permits will be issued in Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 7, until such time as the recreation area amenities are complete. 2. If amenities are not complete by March 1, 1997, the Town of Oro Valley will claim the remaining assurance bond and contract the completion of the work. In the meantime, please be advised that the Town of Oro Valley considers this recreation area to be incomplete and unsatisfactory for public use. The Town requires that barricades be installed to prevent access to the parking lot. Further, signage must be erected, indicating that the recreation area is closed until improvements are complete. The barricades and signage must be in place by January 17, 1997. Please contact my office if you have any questions. Sincerely, Chuck Sweet Town Manager c: Mayor & Council Don Chatfield, Planning & Zoning Director David Hook, Town Engineer Tobin Sidles, Town Attorney Bob Maassen, Building Official f:\data\w p\d I c\ry_n 7 p r k.I tr I if 714;m1-ir tax I IVL i of i =--:f LJ�- ipa$ '— i i° Lon 1fr-o-i+1ext a a,k e-44�-_ti.�xM l C01Dept.- `�V p 7, �Co. to(P I Phone# 1 Phone* I -�i L(7 c I 1FM# 1l l�_ (� Fax The - "—' `r( "--'-' --� Engineering • Planning 'YY LR surveying•urban Design Group�. January 22, 1997 Mr. rinn t`hlfoir4 • Dl•�nninn r'irrrr'ttir Tni,n of fnrn\lntic�v ♦'re♦.•. '... may.. snnn i\i i ft P‘nrtme4 nr. Oro Valley, AZ 85737 c .,k i,-,r-�• Ranchn ltirtn�n N-!g t,"i►itr\rlf'1 7 1j telr'v w. r ii1.•.rr11v •,.r r.v,r.r. .- . .... .......... . P ran VV. V, VY>Iranunity i YY s1 WLB No. 185050-A-019-0200 Dear ivir. Chatfield_ I •_ _l L •!� r�� •� address J��� the of The YY LTS Group, inc. has been retained by V iitO5o r di u ie j to add ess it 1e requirements of the Riparian Habitat Protection Overlay District 45 they apply W the above prr.oject. As you may know, we were the Landscape Arciiiieciui a di u3 Civil Ei igit leer I(itJ, flint which or igi►ial:y designed the park a year or so ago. J- L� the �a _L`�L.. has During the course of construction a number of changes were ri is a 1U a ie project 1fYi iic.i i has 1 J_ i i b caused a certain amount of concern for Town staff. in particular is a reteniivr uvetei iuoas;�i which was not constructed per pian. For whatever reason it is now necessary to extend a Nips from the detention basin to a point where it can •"daylight• in the ad jacei ii sit ed'i i. ii i ui deg tv r construct tnis grain, it win oe necessary to dig a trench with a trenching machine. T i ie site ui the trencher will require trimming the limbs of the trees along the alignment. An aerial photograph of the proposed trench alignment has been inciuded which shows the existing riparian habitat. The trenching operation will cause a limited amount or disturoance to the surface of the ground along with the aforementioned tree limb trimming. i ne deveioper is proposing to "hand-dig"those portions of the trench where it passes through the most sensitive areas. Additionally, the alignment will be marked with surveyors tape and each at the workers assigned to the project will be directed to refrain from disturbing any areas outside the limits of the trenching operation. The wash and riparian areas are surrounded by residential development to the east and me park to the west. No additional buffering is being proposed. Due to the limited construction being or000sed there is no anticipated need for irrigation or passive water harvesting. The or000sed trench construction does not destroy any habitat and therefore has no need for a replacement or recreation policy. Natural grades will be restored and the trench will be recomoacted There are no new olant materials being proposed and therefore no irrigation system is heinn proposed. Clearing shall be limited to removal of those few tree branches __ which interfere with the trenching activities. Engineering ' Planning • Surveying • Urban Design • Lariascape Architecture unties tocaiec to r ucson, r t Cnrx. veeyas. a�v Y t .ltii v��i�ii:y, vcii:;v„•:� 4444 East Broadway • Tucson, Arizona 85711 • (520) 881-7480 • FAX (520) $81-7492 T n • 1 7ni.I T nnn-Jr Inca tl11 I Tnntin (-vim I I I nn.s.n T\T I i n L 7 in in Thy, WI 14 Group. January 22, Sy r Page 2 This proposal for trenching is based upon selective clearing. Again only a few branches will be affected by the project. The wash is part of the open space maintained by the Rancho vistoso waster homeowners Association. Therefore, any dead or damaged plants will be replaced by the RVMHOA. The area should return to a natural appearance within a matter of a few weeks and will be hydroseeded with approved mix iif necessary. Within a year there should be no indication the wash was ever disturbed. The Rancho Vistoso Partnership currently has a bond for revegetation and landscaping which is applicable to this site. We hope this report answers the Town's questions concerning the impact to the wash due to the proposed trenching project. Sincerely, THE WLB GROUP. INC,. / /2/ /2 \t/ //:; Av /r ( harlPs W Hulsey, AKCP f / Director of Planning and Landscape Architecture CWH:tei ♦.r 1 V r e.LL.x WgittanYkPraigctIM850501PlaartingITrenett.M.wP4 cc: William Walker Dick Maes • 7r1 ' I "04- 1 Tfrwr3r` 'nu tIu_t Trinttn rt Ad TT t Tn.Lt TIT T i n L. ITT TA * w Date: January 28, 1997 TO: Don Chatfield, Planning and Zoning Director FROM: Manuel Padilla, Zoning Inspector RE: INSPECTION OF RV NEIGHBORHOOD 7,PARCEL G, RECREATION PARK On January 28, 1997 Steve Faaborge and I visited the park to inspect the progress of items listed on the Vistoso Partner's letter dated, January 20, 1997. Jim Dawson from Vistoso Partner was there and helped identify the progress of each item in review. I informed Jim Dawson that any item not in conformance with the approved landscape plan or development plan, requires an "as built" plan to indicate changes submitted to the Town. He said by when, and I said I didn't know, but would try to let him know by Wed. or Thurs. [ Don, after your meeting with Chuck Sweet]. The update is as follows: Landscape installation: 1. Use of grass in basin, instead of hydroseed. PROGRESS = Grass not in place. Jim Dawson said it will be the last work to be completed within the basin. They first have to bore a hole through the dam/dike, reshape the slope of the basin, plant trees along the upper edge of the basin, and then plant the grass. NEED TO SHOW ON "AS BUILT" PLAN. 2. Trees along the edge of the basin. PROGRESS = Trees not in place. See above, item # 1. I explained to Jim D. that until these trees are in place, the landscaping is not considered to in compliance. NEED TO SHOW ON "AS BUILT" PLAN. 3. Grass on inside slopes of basin. PROGRESS = Grass not in place. See item # 1, and this is a Public Works issue to resolve. RV Park pg. 2 4. The existing ped. trail was built [not per plan]. PROGRESS = Almost finished, different from approved development plan. NEED TO SHOW ON "AS BUILT" PLAN. 5. Concrete trash containers. PROGRESS = Not in place, are ordered and waiting for delivery. Temporarily, Jim has placed metal trash cans with hold downs in place. PERMANENT CONTAINERS MAY NOT BE IN PLACE BY JANUARY 31, 1997. 6. Bike racks; Progress = Bike racks in place and bolted to concrete slab. Design is different from the development plan. The bike racks are white and will be painted green before the park opens. NEED TO BE SHOWN ON "AS BUILT" PLAN. 7. Wrought iron fence for tot lot. PROGRESS = Not in place. Instead a natural berm has been used and palo verde trees planted west and just beyond the tot lot. NEED TO BE SHOWN ON "AS BUILT" PLAN. 8. Lighting for park. PROGRESS = Lights in place. Location of ground cover lights along ped. trail slightly different from development plan. Don, you indicated at our 1/28/97 meeting that the issue of light location would not be a problem. Grading and Pacing 1. Seat walls: PROGRESS = Seat wall completed, not per approved development plan. Seat wall was incorporated onto the base of the ramada. NEED TO BE SHOWN ON "AS BUILT" PLAN. 2. Retaining wall along the west end of parking area to screen parking spaces. PROGRESS = Retaining wall not in place, instead a berm was built up and landscape to serve as screening of parking spaces from WoodBurn Ave. NEED TO BE SHOWN ON "AS BUILT" PLAN. 3. Underground drain pipe next to Gazebo. PROGRESS = This issue is for Public Works to resolve. 4. Two handicapped parking spaces and access. PROGRESS = Two handicap parking spaces installed. Access for handicap person from parking spaces not stripped. Jim explained that their design of the handicap access is for the person(s) to start at the handicap parking space, travel toward the back of the space, around behind the two handicap spaces, through the driveway leading to the parking area and onto the concrete apron that is off the driveway an at "grade", with a slight slope up to the ramada area. No stripping to indicate to vehicle traffic that this is a shared blacktop/pavement for handicap persons [wheelchairs]. I originally interpreted the development which indicates a space between the two handicap spaces as being a ramp onto the sidewalk that is available to non-handicap persons, in front of the parking spaces and leading to the ramada. It seems that Jim Dawson interpreted this same space as the area to be stripped, extra space that is required between handicap spaces. So I don't know which is correct. Steve Faaborg does not support the existing path for wheelchair access and told Jim Dawson of his disapproval. Unfortunately for us, Steve believes it's a planning issue. My opinion is that for very little time and money, a ramp could be constructed within the existing space that was created between the handicap spaces and provide safe access onto the sidewalk. Sidewalk already in place in front of these two handicap spaces. Your's and Chuck Sweets interpretation, but if access is OK as Jim described, do you want this on the "as built" plan or leave out completely, as in compliance? 5. Handrail behind baseball diamond. PROGRESS = Not in place, OK by your previous, administrative approval. 6. Concrete sidewalk. PROGRESS = A concrete sidewalk exists from the intersection of WoodBurn Ave and Arrowsmith to the parking lot area. I believe this has been previously approved. The following items from previous memos on this matter, not addressed by the Vistoso Partner's letter of January 20, 1997. 1. Basketball stripping; PROGRESS = Not in place. Jim Dawson said one quote for this work was around $ 600.00 . He said he was going to strip it himself. I don't believe this will be completed by 1/31/97. 2. With the on going work for the basin, landscaping, DG, and hydroseeding has not been installed west of the basketball court,[ temporary access into the basin from Woodburn Ave. Until the work is completed within the basin, these items can not be completed. I do not believe these items will be installed by the 1/31/97 deadline. VISTOSO PARTNERS, LLC 5861 S. Kyrene Rd., Suite 1 Tempe, AZ 852283 February 12, 1997 Don Chatfield TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 1000 N. La Canada Oro Valley, Arizona Subject: Neighborhood #7 Park Dear Don: Attached are copies of the site plan for the Neighborhood 7 Park. I have highlighted the three modifications to the plan that you want DRB and Council to approve. I. Deleted the wrought iron fence around 1/2 of the Tot Lot. a. Added 5' concrete walkway around the Tot Lot. b. Added benches around Tot Lot for supervision. c. Added berm, separating Tot Lot from street. d. Added tree spaded trees between Tot Lot and street. e. Added plants to form a natural hedge, separating the Tot Lot from the street. II. Deleted the seat wall near the back stop area. a. Relocated seat wall to an area under the Ramada to allow for better visibility of all areas including the Tot Lot, Basketball Court, Volley- ball Court, Picnic Areas and Softball Field. III. Deleted the retaining wall on West side of the parking lot. Leave the landscaped berm. If there is anything additional shown on these plans, please advise me. Sincerely 17)7 Richard Maes Attachments 1 03 4 $ • i , $ • to l• tt 18 17 1• • t• 11 ..\, 2..,7. / 's• ,., ...,;ill :: ..:,"-e„,, ..., .... ,..,.. -... ._______, , �.\\ ' *--, -Ilk -,.."1 . / g.)•''' iv f 04.44 ^HAND sue- K t f'1 - '1 - / f /, K `\, 1 , c I I'. '., Apar N ', A, \ ,,zbo.,9 \ .. 1 i t11 c 1, i 1 e ` `• •.• .w•I ;,w.• BACKSTOP i . `'\ ow gip,. • \ L +r_1i�. ; �.,� • I 1 I M ?EMI.S - F r `• - 1 280•.1 I'%` HAND PLAC>m �, I ` i I' o14IIk � ' o , rye °n\ i I,-.1 i \ . _1„1„1 P� 1AP I 03 1 1�p5,--,_ ,, s :Wr- :�- t I 1 ,. %. 14'li BACKSTOP CURB ' t-2•146 • b I14 ri m • ?ebs.s" +1 Ali-. svwLE 1/14,',. IA );,- ;< ..Inee.......,_ - .. . 0) l © SECTION A-A 1 .ter. ,0115 ®,;1-,� m - . 4!iiir )47111111P IL" b4k ( / ./ . ...\ . 1 ' do) .'.--gliiimajr —le 0 ill* • cat*''''' •••'` A 14,,ailokx _ , 90'.,1.:- :_. .,.... „, ...„ ‘ / / - ' . , , . .1)/11'Cs. 3° I \ .1 °\ ` � / ?an..a !Ap• r 101 OAIJI.PPE IM/SEMI CONNECTERS. I O a J j a ' PAINT If/P i COAT PRISM a:FIELD COATS I• c AISZars /Q@��'� ,.. . ' „ , _ ,r________................. I ::"....\:1/� • 1,a+ I i ' r:47, rit r:1;�:�' r�a sn.rrc s us�a oG e. 1 ��I ��;� '�' .. NOTE TtIE OPEN BFMCE ALbNi!TI,>E EAs rEIM�DIIoe1 r `�� � �� 1 ?. .f t Jt'. � .. '� �, \1.01:„..,,,li," Nr IR '����KT AND '�^��r F c 'i, ® ••1 L ' PRO7EOTID PRIOR TO�T OF faL B CONC•M� x 7822.' 1 • I, , ii,",�>yl� 9 r 8 y THE GRADING OPERATION FOR MS PROJECT. .. \ \ 1 ' „A:Ft• ! 4411111114t,. ' 110?OlP'1'4C '' ,',, 280'..k• 0 ... _ , P 1,\\M• iiisl llihmimmeLl.1e.1 I6.i.o1.4=.o1.k.:5,1,,,;i ir,ii-�1... ,• .�? . ., ',. _ • 6,wAORAL DETAL i ` 1 f •tir. 4 �° NTS \ , , \ E \ 1 ` \, 1� A **,i`.1u; 1 t.r`tom 10d • -�. ••, ty-2.8 S 9 E ' \ ^ i� `mil: x • .ti � ' v 1 I.i , :c....ise. i a \ \ \ , k‘ ....,,,,,, ilis)\. • ••\....1 _,.-0,.61 ,. ---.., gnaw 408 2,, ' 1 \\\111111.,...4101.. ." <7IP‘ .,,<- ... _ ,\ \.li.\ r [.. ,, e..s ,1, r. 13.36' , 28;': ' - \ \ s \\\\\\\ \ An \ V. . s ._ . 1 \\\\ ., .......... .. ., ,...,i.• '.... '•'...-.7". ,...,-_.: '.....,,' , ' . '.7==-1:, _3 - „..o.cr: v , D \ . - � \ I � ' mom i.\ i�) i�* .'. �Y _ ��.- `f 1 = Ot8' =' �1 1( " o.ar - 0 11` \ \ '\:, \.\ \ / • , • 10.0' 1 \. • Ig ipN 1\ it1,‘\, \\\\' : • v ;; • \'., r SECTION C-C SECTION D D n... \ C — r W ` \ \\\ , �d05- ti v. `1 1.,6, :--2:,,' ' ... (if!) . . - r, \. ,.•\. . .I, \ \ ` \\ \ . - 2bOf.d , 1 '8A, , .- // AREA CALCULATIONS s t Io°1 -s DRAINAGEWAYS- .65 ACRES ' �2sG SEAT WALL NATURAL OPEN SPACE_ .78 ACRES e B .{1 ' I °°.°oo° ,°vo; �p.gAp SEE GRAbED AREAS= 3.97 ACRES 0' 20' 40' 80' 120 \ i i . ; r ,, r I As"e"act"'K Q as a,c cry. _ . r 1 I 1 .. rffr-t�✓i� t�J'f Q -I,t87eS. CONTOUR INTERVAL=1'' I 1►j i\ �► - Te40• she., !•,M••r1•• • PI•4444o s•r.•>r•� LMNne•N ArMll•el•r•.Ilr�nl D••1•n - .. 4.. _ t ti-n--- i- ---- T.ov.o0 7�irS-------- =ti_ O09A-0o1-0200 L-3 1 _ - cm.. 1ee■1.•,n Tre■°n, 'so2. 12-8-'Il4 SIRE�/GRAa° B �■• n . ntr •n• c1 .v• . t, Me, JILY.1pYe ,� , g y-=4.Bg (IE1N1/.BANK PROTECTION ALONG N BOUI�AIfY°',"-er K.iM ^' 9 C I< °'o••`--' - - ,M+•.t T.t1■, ... _ - n...q^,. 1..:■.0 Yr DJ31 t5 t 2 3 . 5 4 7 8 9 10 tt '. t3 Deite' elal tntl nt Il InfaU L.eiave. lc,andscA,K,a )6 I '1, 1 /_(1_ , Ir(Y) ., \,,,,,.,:,sr/( .,.„ , , , , ,,.. ,,,,,,;„ .. 4,"* ' issoY: —ii— . . , .-- 111—:=_-- , 3i LL �V-141-4T G • -f) _,-.- li - 1' ill ,i. ir4— Fir:11J- _ — r PA.—K——I K 1 4 :.1, '" .. ii iii - 1111) 4 • JC1111 '1 ` i, � � • •, 1 LANDSCAPE BERM/WALL w • • a •1 t 4 ,t� 4* • • •1` •I r; .ii• Y s ••p .'.>tv. ti „ V.,str ' E ., . — ita.2ii 4 N , , , :: I it.` a f ,,,. ., ' - — . . -4, _...., _.: ,e,'.... .. 14. v. r , 4 . •. or, February 28, 1997 TO: Bryant Nodine, Senior Planner FROM: Manuel Padilla, Zoning Inspector RE: RANCHO VISTOSO RECREATIONAL PARK The Rancho Vistoso recreational park in Neighborhood 7 is in the process of being brought into Town compliance. Some major items that are not in compliance are already being prepared to go back to DRB. Minor items in need of compliance are to be completed by 2/28/97, as agreed between Rancho Vistoso Partners and the Town. I met with Jim Dawson, a Rancho Vistoso Partners representative on 2/19/97 and conducted a walk-thru compliance inspection. I had a follow-up telephone conversation on 2/27/97 with Jim and we agreed that the following information will be current as of 2/28/87. They are as follow: ITEM COMPLETED YES/NO COST TO COMPLETE 1. Concrete Yes Completed trash cont. 2. Trees in Yes Completed ret. basin 3. Landscaping Yes Completed west of basketball ct. 4. Stripping of No (90% complete) $100.00 basketball court 5. Turf in No $5000.00 ret. basin $5100.00 X 120% =$6120.00 Hold $ 6120.00 from bond for items listed that are not completed. C: Chuck Sweet, Town Manager CONSENT ITEM A TOWN OF ORO VALLEY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD REPORT MEETING DATE: March 11, 1997 TO: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD FROM: Linda Frew, Planner I SUBJECT: OV12-94-21 Rancho Vistoso, Neigh. 7, Parcel G, REVISED RECREATION AREA PLAN BACKGROUND: In accordance with the adopted master plan for Rancho Vistoso, a portion of Parcel G, Neighborhood 7, was set aside as a recreational facility to serve the present and future residents of that neighborhood. The plan was approved by the Council, based on DRB's recommendations, in 1994. The recreation area, which is 5.4 acres in size, is located on the east side of the Woodburne Ave. alignment, west of New World's future project in Parcel G, and south of Arrowsmith Drive. The park, as it exists today, includes both active and passive types of recreation, i.e. picnicking, a ball diamond, sand volleyball court and one-half basketball court and a tot lot. At this time, the park is nearly complete but, during the course of construction, some deviations from the approved park plan were noted. These changes are depicted on an "as-built" plan, which is before the DRB for a recommendation this evening. SUMMARY: The applicant, Mr. Dick Maes, Rancho Vistoso Partners, has annotated a set of plans I, II and III, to indicate the locations of the "as-built" changes: Rather than the wrought iron fence, which was to partially encircle the tot lot, the applicant has installed a walkway around the play area with bench seating, a convenience for parents who may wish to "get in" some walking exercise, or to simply have a comfortable place to sit, while supervising their youngsters' activities. The aforementioned walkway interconnects all major activity areas within the park, as built. A hydroseeded berm with a "natural hedge" and spaded trees separates the tot lot from Woodburne Ave. II. A wall designed to provide bench-type seating near the back stop area of the ball diamond was deleted and wall seating was installed near the ramada area. It is the applicant's contention that, from this vantage point, near the ramada, good visibility is provided to all activity areas in the park. III. A retaining wall, along the west side of the parking lot area was deleted in favor of a larger (i.e. wider) undulating landscaped berm. RECOMMENDATION: Planning Staff has received information that this park is currently being well-utilized by area residents and we have had no complaints regarding its layout or these specific changes to the original plans. Staff finds that the changes described above meet the intent of the originally approved plan and, in essence, will make the park more user-friendly for parents and children alike. As such, we recommend approval of the "as built" park plans for Rancho Vistoso, Neigh, 7, Parcel G. SUGGESTED MOTION: The DRB may wish to consider one of the following motions: I move to recommend approval of OV12-94-21, the revised recreation area plan for the Rancho Vistoso, Neigh. 7, Parcel G recreation area, as presented. ATTACHMENTS 1. Letter of explanation from Dick Maes 2. Plan indicating areas of revision 12-94-21\revrec.rpt 2 P�LEY qR/, 0.f Q„ ,VgM a Q O '" 3 �!'4"4i4° `4' 17 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY -4 t ,, N it .,. 680 W. Calle Concordia � , °' ,, JA*41 ORO VALLEY,ARIZONA 85737 ,, f' ", Public Works Department k` .'t. (520)797-2442 fax(520)797-2202 POVNDED ' March 19 , 1997 The WLB Group, Inc . 4444 E . Broadway Tucson, AZ 85711 Attn: Tracy Bogardus SUBJECT: Rancho Vistoso, Neighborhood 7, Parcel G Recreation Area Pond Dear Tracy: This letter is in response to your correspondence to me dated March 12 , 1997 . Most all items from previous letters have been addressed. Below are some items that still need clarification. 1 . How will benching in the pond be accomplished. Will fill be brought in? If so, will the appropriate storage volume still be available? Will inlet and outlet pipes have to be extended? 2 . There will be 0 . 9 feet between the inverts of the 6 inch bleeder pipe and the 8 inch bleeder pipe in the catch basin. Therefore there will likely be 0 . 9 feet of standing water within the pond that must infiltrate into the ground. How long will there be standing water in the basin until it all percolates into the ground? If you have questions or comments for me, please call . I can be reached at 797-2442 . Sincerel , C C-- Jim Hossley Development Services Public Works Department cc : Chuck Sweet, Town Manager David Hook, Town Engineer Don Chatfield, Planning and Zoning Director Dick Maes f : \ . . . \jgh\comment\GPOND3 .LTR VISTOSO PARTNERS 5681 S. Kyrene Rd., Suite 1 Tempe, AZ 85283 .W.1 A L" 602 831-2000 2 41991 March 21, 1997 Don Chatfield Town of Oro Valley 11000 N. La Canada Oro Valley, Arizona Subject: Neighborhood 7 park Dear Don: I would like to request a reduction in the revegetation and completion bond held by Oro Valley for the Neighborhood 7 Park. The items that are not completed are as follows. 1. Planting the grass in the retention basin $ 25,000 at .06 cents= $1,500.00 2. Painting basketball lines on the short children's basket -the regulation basket has already been completed. $ 100.00 3. Installing the bubble up structures for the drain line on the retention basin. $1,000.00 4. Hydroseed the disturbed area in the wash where the drain line was installed $ 500.00 There is less than $ 5,000 of work to complete the items on the park. I would request that the balance of money be released from the bond. Thank you for review and prompt action. Si er y, Richard Maes RM/cck April 2, 1997 TO: Chuck Sweet, Town Manager FROM: Don Chatfield, P&Z Director RE: REVEGETION BOND FOR RANCHO VISTOSO PARTNERS This memo is in response to a letter received March 24, 1997 from Mr. Dick Maes, Vistoso Partners, on his request to reduce the revegetation bond for Neighborhood 7, Park. Planning and Zoning staff inspected the Park for landscape compliance on February 27, 1997 and reviewed the outcome of the inspection with Jim Dawson of Vistoso Partners. A landscape compliance report was addressed to Bryant Nodine, Senior Planner on February 28, 1997 (attached). The report outlines the status of work completed and work not in compliance. The report also has the approximate dollar value to complete the work not in compliance as provided by Jim Dawson of Vistoso Partners. Based on the request by Mr. Maes to reduce the revegetation bond, a follow-up landscape inspection was conducted on March 28, 1997. The inspection found no further work improvements or compliance different from the status as outlined on the February 28, 1997 memo. Mr. Maes's letter addresses four items and its associated cost to complete. There is a discrepancy on item # 1 on the cost to complete work. Mr. Dick Maes calls out the cost to be $1500.00 to put turf in the detention basin. Mr. Jim Dawson provided staff with a dollar amount of $5000.00 to complete same work. RV Bond page 2 Therefore, if the Department of Public Works is satisfied their requirements are in compliance, the Planning & Zoning department recommends the Town not reduce the revegetation bond to less than $8000.00. This is based on the fact the revegetation bond used to satisfy bond requirements at Neighborhood 7, Park is a roll over from a bond on Neighborhood 11 golf course. The golf course is not in compliance, there is no permanent irrigation system on holes 11 and 12 as required by the approved landscape plan. The Town is holding $8000.00 until the golf course is in compliance. The following is a break-down of items not in compliance. ITEM LOCATION DOLLAR AMOUNT TO COMPLETE 1. Turf in ret. basin Neighborhood 7, Park $5000.00 2. Stripping of BB.Court Neighborhood 7, Park $100.00 3. Hydro-seed wash Neighborhood 7, Park $500.00 TOTAL $5600.00 The recommended amount of bond money to be held for Neighborhood 7, Park is $5600.00, plus 120 percent of the actual cost,= $5600. X 120. The minimum to be held for Neighborhood 7, Park until it is in full compliance is = $6720.00. The recommended amount of bond money to be held for Neighborhood 11, golf course, holes 11 & 12 (lack of a permanent irrigation system) is $8000.00. In the event Neighborhood 7, Park is brought into compliance, $8000.00 dollars need to be held as a roll over back to Neighborhood 11, for golf course holes # 11 & 12 for lack of permanent irrigation system as required by the approved landscape plan for the golf course. F:\DATA\WP\MSP\RVBOND.PRK • 7 ' TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: April 2, 1997 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL FROM: Linda Frew, Planner I SUBJECT: OV 12-94-21 Rancho Vistoso, Neighborhood 7, Parcel G, Revised Recreation Plans BACKGROUND: In accordance with the adopted master plan for Rancho Vistoso, a portion of Parcel G, Neighborhood 7, was set aside as a recreational facility to serve the present and future residents of that neighborhood. The plan was approved by the Council, based on DRB's recommendations, in 1994. The recreation area, which is 5.4 acres in size, is located on the east side of the Woodburne Ave. alignment, west of New World's residential project in Parcel G, and south of Arrowsmith Drive. The park, as it exists today, includes both active and passive types of recreation, i.e. picnicking, a ball diamond, sand volleyball court, a one-half basketball court and a tot lot. At this time, the park is nearly complete but, during the course of construction, some deviations from the approved park plan were noted. These changes are depicted on an "as-built" plan, which is before the DRB for a recommendation this evening. SUMMARY: The revised park plans include the following changes: • Rather than the wrought iron fence, which was to partially encircle the tot lot, the applicant has installed a walkway around the play area with bench seating, a convenience for parents who may wish to "get in" some walking exercise, or to simply have a comfortable place to sit, while supervising their youngsters' activities. The aforementioned walkway interconnects all major activity areas within the park, as built. A hydroseeded berm with a "natural hedge" and spaded trees separates the tot lot from Woodburne Ave. • A wall designed to provide bench-type seating near the back stop area of the ball diamond was deleted and wall seating was installed near the ramada. It is the applicant's contention that, from this vantage point, near the ramada, good visibility is provided to all activity areas in the park. • A retaining wall, along the west side of the parking lot area was deleted in favor of a larger (i.e. wider) undulating landscaped berm. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 2 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD ACTION: The Development Review Board approved the above-referenced changes as a part of its consent agenda on March 11, 1997 with no discussion. RECOMMENDATION: Planning Staff endorses the DRB's recommendation for approval of the revised recreation plan for the neighborhood park in Neighborhood 7, Rancho Vistoso. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to approve OV 12-94-21, a revised "as-built" recreation area plan for Rancho Vistoso, Neighborhood 7, Parcel G, as presented. OR I move to deny OV 12-94-21, a revised "as-built" recreation area plan for Rancho Vistoso, Neighborhood 7, Parcel G, finding that: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Reduced "as-built" plans for the recreation area 4%_ ; I►& �-=.1' D-,,art V: t Head I .AI L.,.I A. A dr Town Manager 12-94-21\revrec.tcc qiistoso Par1ners a Fri) 998 January 22, 1998 ` n f Oro Va//P v Mr. Don Chatfield Town of Oro Valley Oro Valley, AZ 85737 Subject: Golf Club at Vistoso Bonds Dear Don: I would like yo clear up the situation with the remaining bond being held for the golf course. The only question that I am aware of is whether or not the bond should be released because we did not install an irrigation system on the revegetation portion of a couple of holes. There is no question that the revegetation is equally developed on all holes throughout the golf course both irrigated and non-irrgated, and has thoroughly grown in to a point that irrigation is not a factor in keeping the desert vegetation alive. Please release the remaining bond, or give me direction as to going back before the council to verify the fact that we have met the revegetation requirements for all areas within the golf course corridors. If there are any questions, call me so that we can resolve this issue. Sincerely, \q/ Dick Maes DMljlr 5861 S. Kyrene Rd,Suite 1 • Tempe,AZ 85283• Phone(602)831-2000 • Fax(602)831-1330 ,..,,,,w,,. _...,...._,.+Mr.w,..,..r..w. .,,....IM..,._.,...G1t..[_, .....,+Y.« _.,M.t _.n..+..._....wia..,...a.....w.+.............,.._,.......,. OLLEY ARC OQ \O?' 1>~ TOWN OF ORO VALLEY ► 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA 85737 A AA- Administrative Offices(520)297-2591 Fax(520)297-0428 —UN DEO,g�°` June 19, 1998 Vistoso Partners 5681 S.Kyrene Rd. Suite 1 Tempe,AZ 85283 RE: CD#0259276227 Amount$16,000.00 OV 12-94-21 Dear Mr.Maes, The Town of Oro Valley has authorized release of the above referenced CD in the amount of$16,000.00 For Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 7,Parcel G Recreation Area. Sincerely, Shirley Gay, Assurance Clerk •