Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
OV100011
TynanGroup Real Estate Development Services June 29, 2000 Dee Widero Town of Oro Valley 11,0000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 R E: Re-submittal for a Height Variance for AT&T Wireless Services Dear Ms. Widero: At the request of Mr. Dick Maes, AT&T Wireless Services requests that the Board of Adjustment reconsider the location of the proposed flagpole facility within the Vistoso Golf/ Stone Canyon area. Attached is a letter from Richard Maes to Bryant Nodine addressing this issue. A revised application and site plan for the flagpole installation to be located in front of the Maintenance Yard at the Vistoso Golf Course is attached. On behalf of AT&T Wireless Services, I regret the need for a second review and appreciate the special consideration in this matter. Sincerely, • • f• Martha Kuenhold Tynan Group Project Manager Representing AT&T Wireless Services Attachment: R. Maes Letter TvnanGroup,Inc.•3333 East Carnelback Road,Suite 280 Phoenix,Arizona 85018.Office:(602)522-2655•Fax:(602)522-2660•ww-w.tynangroup.corn Lr . . VISTOSO PARTNERS, L.L.C. 1121 WC:ST WAPNeR ROAD• SUITE 109 • TEMPI. A1lIZONA 692114 040) 631-2o00 • FAx(4*0) 891-1404 May 23, 2000 Mr. Bryant Nodine Town of Oro Valley 11000 North La Canada Drive Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 Re: Flagpole Variance Dear Bryant: We are working with the Tynan Group representing AT&T Wireless regarding the installation of a flagpole in Rancho Vistoso that will be used as a telephone antenna. This Is an excellent way to solve the aesthetic problem of having an antenna sticking up in the air. In addition, we have terrible cell phone coverage in Neighborhood 11 and around the Golf Club at Vistoso so this will help solve the problem. The original proposal was to have the flagpole by the cart barn at the Golf Club at Vistoso. Tynan Group proceeded to process a variance far the flagpole and received it from Oro Valley. That is about when I became involved and realized that Tynan wanted the flagpole to be a permanent structure which would be there for 20-30 years. This will not work since the cart barn is temporary and may be moved after a permanent clubhouse is built. What I would like to get approved is the relocation of the flagpole and the operations shed down to the Golf Course maintenance building off Pebble Creek Drive_This way, the flagpole and the maintenance shed can be incorporated In with a permanent building and would be easier to blend in with existing facilities. Would it be possible to transfer the flagpole approval from the Golf Club cart barn to the Golf Club maintenance building without going through a new variance request? Please give me a call at 602-541-1198. Sincerely, PA-6/"A-49(' -)Y141- Richard Maes RM/mrk NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE ORO VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT In accordance with Sec. 1-708 of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised and Arizona Revised Statutes Sec. 9-462.06, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Oro Valley Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, July 25, 2000, commencing at or after 3:00 p.m. The meeting will be held at the Oro Valley Town Hall, 11000 N. La Canada Drive and the subject matter will be as further described below: OV10-00-11: AT&T WIRELESS PCS SERVICES, INC., (REPRESENTED BY MARTHA KUENHOLD PROJECT MANAGER, TYNAN GROUP) 1 E. DESERT SKY CLUB, #2, ORO VALLEY, AZ 85737, REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO INCREASE THE HEIGHT FOR A FLAG POLE/ANTENNA INSTALLATION IN A PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT ZONE TO A HEIGHT OF 50'. SUBJECT PROPERTY: LOCATED AT THE VISTOSO GOLF MAINTENANCE FACILITY, 955 W. PEBBLE CREEK, ORO VALLEY,AZ 85737. As part of the AT&T Wireless Service's (ATTWS) ongoing network and service improvement, engineers at ATTWS have identified the need for a Personal Communications Service facility to serve the Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 11 area. Under current zoning regulations for flagpole installation, the code states that the maximum height can not exceed 1.25 x the height of the adjacent structure. The minimum height necessary for the facility is 50' requested by the engineers. The height of the Maintenance Facility is not greater than 20', which would dictate a flagpole not to exceed 25'. Site plans are available for review during normal business hours at the Oro Valley Town Hall, Community Development Building. Persons interested may appear in person, by agent or attorney, and the petitioners must appear or be represented. Any person seeking further information on this request ' a variance may contact Dee Widero at 229-4812. Bry' .Nodine,AICP Planning and Zoning Administrator POSTED: DM DATE: JULY 10th, 2000 TIME: 4 : 30 p.m. F:\OV\OV 10\2000\10-00-11\NOTICE.doc 0\11 0=00111 1 111 _ /il e",- ass.=i �i t t, �m- Iff„fr r Vfal kit S. •kt.ti l ,'!. �.t.is iv: IOu:.as•0, ... ‘..' -.4*44*1. -, ;n}+fat: nna��ao ,.,, 'js Camay f!111111FO$,s.0�rA *17 11011 l..4 ir4, .o:1,,...ae.ifi' . .11841.4%444' .,,.....":la itt :HI ` .: OroValley A/`' - " i 41 ,� „tea i rip lit4i .17 Fe*q - I Parcels *tt, • 11,Ir.* , N II ��i.r o• c tv W r E ►�.�� yam•�yr��i� 44� s.,�..A "'�� 4zati 1 Higls 'AV S�• •♦ ♦�1i�ice♦ 1 .TA IP ar.-741- �Opi, aid.lsi ��\ w..am w� i-iiti. to;i iIS t !*!ì!; ; a�., "'ti+.r.ru w a i ptfaaq t it� Ni- M .s�r.rw ,p►� �If ��i Ian's• fad.i�t i lore/ sz `: 1fV ��� -Ak 1:4,41\AVV.f.-...tksYlit 2......., 0.8 0 0.8 1.6 Miles Jul 17 00 09: 17a C. J CONRAD 503-697-1044 p. 2 J ' kr`' 9)1LIY /9/ 0 0 0 — 4/ . ri-e, 067.66,7 ... er___-7Left 1, ' o' V 4 -- &D -// d74/74 le . (at/L.) i /ILL abcie/t. ...„ i1 /----/m/ X614(4/zetv i � .9 - ,d/ ____ * gf_g (1,Z1Zil, 64'72- ,-,._)-_---.--7 fr7 i jeip, , !� U //l F /:t '/f _, /l C -jl-p-''-"`=7 , ) 1?i 1 V et -.8ah_,n,-;&' teet7(-./ i_ _ - - tw_ , _ V=i - g , f r - �j - - /!,-mil 1Y _ Ai _.;. _ i _ , _4, /),/ ./fL- -/2_ _iti 1_-,/ 7 -- ,__-,,,, "" 6,t e,c,e-c--- - c- iipai-ui-eyi/7 (A/(.14-e-764 . C I t t'aZ-Z- A-Z- e /- „..a_ , 6z.....7 ....7,6,1 / ZZZe /V/ ,L,' 1r7lte_y_ ee bf.--(- t.- Jul 17 00 09: 17a C. J CONRAD 503-697 1044 p. 1 aZrf z. /2t ziL dfyLd F/7711- ,e_v 6(-7(./-",_ s - . cy _ . /),-,-/ze-w __y_4_} ,_,/zieti , 4&,./Tz,,-2. A-,e-- 7z-it t ,,/./1fr7 1-dii - aJi--/-dd____ uLL mt-t -6-tx-- al: 0-nyezi a-1(-- --- ati- u1-6 .&-' 11-1-' v '4.1 _,/,77)-z/9a. --, .i 1t# ' 64ez d_z,---x,5 L_I-4,ez 6,_)czzio d e/---- e.e- .4tz. ,,mew_,<2 • fK.2 6t, aLe /zezze, /Le ii7g_,-z /----4_,d . x_, ,d_ ( i.1--i-K /2-w-at-------:g a___4- . — c/e_x_Zza;/ /-ite__-- 7e..-/---/-)--e- -/-(iwAte/d7ir-7/7 _ ,_ - rii,Ld,4 - a/.___? ,11_. _.(...,dee_r_z7 dl-e-1-z 71-'- `" 1i( (,& _46117/zez4.-Z-- I-/-6 -- 1(- ,-Y 2 /2z __,y /, 6zw,,,,,,,,,,x ,__"„„____, e,_ , ,-Y,6e,.. ---x__- _x__.--.6_,- /--a e___', ,_ _ , _ -, ,, _ _ _ ,f*--„:,(.._ r , - , _ _ -�l j J r/oz--‘6,--2_,-,--„::„.,,_ _,_ , ____ , , ___. _ (f),..a,,,z, ji.eiw-ez,i >447t.-6& (t-- --71--et-o 4‘al-r- i-~-t::-L_ -7- 4-e--7---( fr --1.1_7l- 717, -Z-17r r ce ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT REPORT CASE NO: OV10-00-11 Hearing Date: July 25, 2000 Agenda Item No.: 2 Prepared By: Dee Widero, Senior Zoning Inspector REQUEST: AT&T Wireless PCS Services, Inc., request a variance to increase the height for a flag pole/antenna installation in a Planned Area Development (PAD) zone, to a height of 50'. Subject property location, The Vistoso Golf Maintenance Facility, 955 W. Pebble Creek,Oro Valley,AZ 85737. REQUEST SPECIFICS: As part of the AT&T Wireless Service's (ATTWS) on going network and service improvement, engineers at ATTWS have identified the need for a Personal Communications Service facility to serve the Rancho Vistoso area. Under current zoning regulations for flagpole installation, the code states that the maximum height can not exceed 1.25 x the height of the adjacent structure. The Vistoso Golf Maintenance facility is approximately 22', which would dictate a flagpole not to exceed 27.5'. The applicant states that 50' is necessary in order to provide an adequate height for the telecommunication facility. The applicant has not addressed the finding in their application, but will be present at the hearing. SITE LOCATION: To reach the requested location,drive from either direction on Rancho Vistoso Boulevard around to Vistoso Highlands Drive, turn west, the first street to the south (left) is Hidden Springs Drive turn left. The first street to the west is Pebble Creek follow until you arrive at the Maintenance facility(955 W. Pebble Creek). Take your detailed map for on site location. NOTIFICATION: All property owners within 300 feet of this property have been notified of this hearing. The property has been posted with a Notice of Hearing and the Hearing Notice has been advertised in the Daily Territorial newspaper. At the time of report preparation, staff had received one letter from Lanna Conrad in opposition and Dick Maes with Vistoso Partners has supplied a letter in support,no other comments in support for or in opposition to this request have been received. SITE ANALYSIS: The area surrounding the Flagpole/Antenna site is all Planned Area Development; the Maintenance facility is within the Vistoso Golf Course; to the south high density residential Neighborhood 10, Parcels O&P; on the north is Vistoso Golf Casitas II and the northeast is Vistoso Resort Casitas. PLAN ANALYSIS: The applicant is proposing to install a flagpole/antenna (antenna camouflaged as a flagpole, know as stealth antenna,cell tower). This site was chosen because it is a permanent maintenance facility. The Rancho Vistoso Partners have given approval for this as a permanent location. The facility is meant to serve customers in and around the site location. SUMMARY: Staff finding of facts: • The Golf Maintenance Facility is not greater than 22' in height, zoning allows a maximum height of 27.5', AT&T is asking for an additional 22.5' above maximum allowed and 28' above the adjacent building. • The flagpole/antenna location is approximately 400'to the nearest residence. • The site location requested for variance, sits 10' below grade of Vistoso Highlands Drive. • If this variance request is approved, the applicant will then need to submit to the Development Review Board for approval. • The residents of the area may benefit from the telecommunication facility; the findings have not been meet. The Board of Adjustment should consider the following fmdings in making its decision: A. That there are special circumstances or conditions applying to the property referred to in the application including its size, shape, topography, location or surroundings which do not apply to other properties in the district; and B. That special circumstances were not created by the owner or applicant; and C. That the authorizing of the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights; and D. That any variance granted imposes such conditions as will assure that the authorizing of the adjustment shall not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which such property is located; and E. That the authorizing of the variance will not be materially detrimental to persons residing in the vicinity, to adjacent property,to the neighborhood or the public welfare in general. SUGGESTED MOTION: 2 The Board may wish to consider the following motions: I move to approve OV 10-00-11,a request to allow a stealth antenna installation(cell tower) as a flagpole. OR I move to approve OV 10-00-11,as submitted by the applicant with the following stipulations: (Staff does not have any stipulations to offer) OR I move to deny OV 10-00-11, fmding(Board to state reason why the variance cannot be granted) that: . ATTACHMENTS: 1. BOA Application 2. Proposed Site Plan 3. Location map 4. Code references F:\OV\OV 10\2000-11 AT&TVariance.doc 3 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION 11,000 La Canada Drive, Oro Valley, AZ 85735 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION For: Zoning Variance (height) Case No.: U/v 7O -I/ NATURE OF REQUEST: On behalf of AT&T Wireless Services, (ATTWS), the Tynan Group respectfully requests approval for a height variance for a flagpole located in front of the Vistoso Golf Maintenance facility. The flagpole will provide a vertical structure in which the antenna for a new telecommunication facility will be mounted. Approval of a height variance for the flagpole would allow ATTWS to develop a new wireless facility with the least obtrusive and most aesthetically pleasing installation possible while also providing quality service coverage to the residents of Oro Valley. APPLICANT: AT&T Wireless PCS Services, (ATTWS) represented by Martha Kuenhold Project Manager, Tynan Group PHONE/FAX 906-7323/fax 797-4818 Email: Mkuenhold@tynangroup.com ADDRESS: 1 East Desert Sky Club, Number 2 Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 OWNER: Vistoso Golf Partners, LLC ADDRESS 1121 W. Warner Road,#109 Tempe, Arizona 85254 PARCEL NUMBER: 219 22 001C PROPERTY LOCATION/ADDRESS: 955 W. Pebble Creek LEGAL DESCRIPTION: IRR PTN LYG NLY& NELY 72.41 AC Section 26 11 13 ACREAGE: 72.41 CURRENT ZONING: Residential High Density Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 11, Parcel AL APPLICATION FEE: $200.00 ATTACHMENTS: 13 copies of the following: Photo Simulations, Site Plans, Vicinity Map, County Assessor's Map& Records, FCC Compliance and Adjacent Ownership (300") n Date: L Z zac Martha Kuenhold, Tynan Group, Representing AT&T Wireless Services SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONS FOR APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE AT&T Wireless Services/Vistoso Golf Maintenance Flagpole Installation 1. Identify difficulties or problems that would result from complying with the present zoning requirements. As part of the AT&T Wireless Services's (ATTWS) ongoing network and service improvement, engineers at ATTWS have identified the need for a Personal Communications Services (PCS) facility to serve the Stone Canyon / Rancho Vistoso area. Based on a computerized engineering study considering the local population density and topography, engineers at ATTWS have issued a "search ring" identifying the necessary location for a PCS facility in the area. This search ring represents an area in which a facility must be located to allow it to function as an integral unit in the PCS system. PCS facilities are laid out in a grid pattern and the spacing, height and location of this component site is critical for the successful operation of the overall system. The proposed flagpole antenna installation adjacent to the Vistoso Golf Course Maintenance facility meets the engineering criteria. The immediate area of the search ring for Stone Canyon is residential and resort / club in character and offers no opportunity for collocating on an existing structure. In order to meet the engineering height requirement, a structure was needed on which the antennas could be mounted. Utility poles and light standards as well as flagpoles have been used by the carriers to meet the height requirement. These installations are stealth in nature defined as the camouflaging of an antenna array to integrate the antenna with the structure in terms of design, color and material. In this case, the antenna is fully contained within the structure of the flagpole Under current zoning regulations for flagpole installations, the code states that the maximum height can not exceed 1.25 x the height of the adjacent structure. The Vistoso Golf Maintenance facility is estimated to be approximately 20' which would dictate a flagpole not to exceed 25'. If built according to current zoning regulations, the flagpole would not provide the required height for the telecommunication facility. AT&T Wireless Services requests that a height variance be granted for the proposed flagpole / antenna installation. The minimum height necessary for the facility is 50'. This height is necessary to have the antennas "clear" the adjacent two story apartment complex. If a height variance is granted for the flagpole, the proposed telecommunication facility, defined as a Minor Facility, will be reviewed by the Design Review Board for final zoning approval. 2. Identify and explain all unique and particular circumstances that would prevent you from complying with the present zoning requirements on your property in regard to the following areas (slope, narrowness, shallowness, irregular shape, location,washes,vegetation,and easements, etc.). The location of the flagpole at the front of the Maintenance facility has been selected to be fully integrated in the design and function of the existing facility. As previously stated, the request variance of 50' would allow the antennas to send a clear signal over the adjacent two story apartment complex. 3. Identify and explain any particular conditions in the surrounding area, which would keep you from complying with the present zoning requirements. There are no existing structures with the required height for the collocation of antennas for a new ATTWS facility within the surrounding area. PCS facilities are designed to cover a small geographic area, frequently a two to four mile radius from the site. The proposed site is designed to provide coverage to the immediate area. Residents in and around the site location as well as patrons of the golf course and clubhouse facilities will be direct beneficiaries of the improved communication services. Cellular phones are no longer considered to be a luxury but a necessary service for residents. The use of cellular phones has become an effective tool in emergency situations. 4. Provide the following: Current list of property owners See attached Thirteen Copies of dimensioned preliminary site plan See attached Thirteen Copies of dimensioned floor plan N/A An estimate of the incremental cost of the change in, or additions to, the property, such as estimated cost to be endorsed as accurate by licensed contractor or engineer. The ATTWS construction costs for this site are estimated to be: Equipment Shelter and facade $35,000 Flagpole $20,000 Site Work $40,000 Installation of Antenna $15,000 AT&T Wireless Services Proposed Facility Vistoso Golf Maintenance AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES Site Photographs and Photo Simulation - AT&T WIRELESS SITE: TU 87„__ S:,,7,_iti NE CANYON ---_ -- -- - � = ;�-� ——3=—_ -__ �x .�. •��.:.� •,-,-_.t. ".`.�; - _ �.�� --— -- ----- ---- _-- - - - - t --E 1 -:;1447- `t �. , ,.. .i ;q :s' %� , ::r! s ` :!: _ _ -=_-`--___=--_-- - -- — - _--- =-_ =___ _ -- em __ -- -r= - — = = - — �_ --- ._____` -_- __-= -- _-- -__ ue==T=- _„,7____7_ __ :.„-_€_7=;,,,_, =,,.=_::,___________,__. ._______, _ _ _ _ 77-77 -- -_ { -) u`' YY _��_ _--- _ PHOTO SIMULATION t Thian i17N1p ,ral Ewa,I)rvrinpmmi.Srrnrrc r I u .111 • 11 IN III II II III ull a"„ .hr# r Intl"I y l...' IV4.:.,,a v.x „ ..:n �I;. - .. C7 -,, ,IIII � ' .,:s Ir NI I ��„ h�� l.. III ti VI II �p ` I I I � 6 I.II I -a«a II nn�N'« � "I III .l':1111111'111,,21!,,,,',:un, Ia II .. III III• I Ik[ I� �'��.N M II Vo I �. �" II :V I ,�,. �III IIIIIIVI'�_ I. IIm NIµ II 6ryp�oI II �I , ,,' ,art lu." I - 4. ,'rt „'.' w `iu li''"' 'p�c''' I..,I,, j " onIPI tl* II III' r IIUIINII N^" . �� III"uII ,*11 r I INIIII°IIII .,r,. III IIIIII ally GGn'R..,. —, t -n:y-� III it q 9 w. .. _.. °tl „ ...`..s. a mIIIIIII I III<h°.. 111" q lII111,1I II I" I'µw"tl1 II'IIIWI > " Iam I I r III ,.jIIIII ." I 'ItlI l il� �I��: 4, III t,`"tlIIN "" .° ,. a° .., .: ..�."a I I„ tlW M• .,.. .. ..,..... ._....- .",,, _. mwMdlr,�. . h�r� IN SOUTHTO PPS°P ) [f� ICi,,7 � I �'�� n�� 111111 ; n 111 al 01 '„,0' 41,4 h - '11 ,j4 IM1 I' 11 '14 1'01111113 ' „ 11,111111 .,11111 I LOOKING EAST TO PROPOSED SHELTER LOCATION , .• .. ,... .... ........ '"1"'•"•••• -—•—•-•••'1,••••'.'„,.':4'..,,,':,,,•14'..,,,,„,1„ti.,•",.r.,:•.--,•„...-o-•_.-4,-,1•111'.4,1'.10.'-;••','.!11'.:ZI•L',"•,.„;,:::i4,•',„:.•-••:.••'.„,„'.••••..- •„:0..••••••. ••..,•-•:,•,,..„,,, .....•.........,,... • • ••••.:•••••.•••1:.••,1,1,.,,..„.•,.,:::::. -••••••„..•"..,.••••.. •....,,,,,,,•-• •,,:.,L•,,,,,.,..!..,,•'.1.„.,„,....,„ ••::',:.•••i•-•••...:_',•:!:,•,,,'•:'•,i.z,•,,;,„..„„";-.•''•:.'•:••,..':-,li!:''!,•'''(-,••i-‘,,:,,•-...:.,:::';,''i,;;14.1.!.,,„N'4•••;?-hi',,11,'''.10•••hli'''..,••:'„,•,',",,;•....,,,,,,k.,,o„,.-4..,;-_,4':t..:1-..,•':4,„,i•:••$,,i1.2-•'-!!.j.':4,,•..1,,•:•'•••:.,•,..,'..,..-,:•.•••;'••'.,:..„.•,. -„ :,....:. : •:.••••,,, ..„..-....: . _ ._,,,.._ ,:•-•,:,,.,d,tr,i,•, •,,!'•,•:,••••'•••• •:. ••••••••-•••'..• !:••••,,....!•"•••,..1••,•',•,••''•:•,••,.;••'••••••.:.,,,,,:,•'••••,,' • •••.•:•:-.,•••:••::.,,,'•••'••••-•-,:,•,•--.----'••••;1!••!'•,-',;•,---- .,,I.:,:,,;•••:,.1i1:1!-•i;7111',..1V, ,,..,„N-,-1, ,,i,,,,•,;...111,,'''''','il!,.1::„•.'1;.,1:',1•'!,!;:,,„'...,,i?..:_-,--....:-,'-,5,-.74,-„,.'-,,..:e'4...,••••,,,::•:'.',•,,..,..:•,•,........:„.•:••.,.. „- ......,..,..,•••,••••,• -:. .. ..-..„,...•:•- .• ..t --.•,,,. • '''•• •••:" . ••• -',••••••:•'•„•'•,:,;'•],,,,I,,;,',•-,,i••••.:. ' '•• ::••••••• '':•:•.",",.••••••••1•:••'!'"''••',••••••.••• .-... -',•,!•H'•••:•••,•,•••„••:„;-,.'••-•'!•!:,•'•17„,,'t.,:',Jf,;.•1§ig,,,',,,'',',,i,,„,„„;'''il,?•,,,,-,„:-..,,,)-„:•-..;;,,01,o,4•0,11,,.;41•'...i,;:i•'',•10,••,•;•,:ii,,,:•' 1, L.,-,'.',-,A77-•,!••--',:-.,":•.-1.!',•;''".:,..:.,•••....-- -.„,-........,,,,:::„„:... •••• • •„•-•••••;•:.• "-.H:,•-••••.•••,..",J _.„..,.,•,..,,,,,,,n,:...,,•••,..:.1,!...• • •••••'•• • •••••••••.•..••••,,:...•. .":.,!•'•:,!',...,;1• •-..4•••':,,,,„,1.•,',-„,,,,r7;..,,I!.....,!•,!.J,,',„,,I..11!,,I,i':',,k,',"411,1.1.,,,,.:.,:-,:,„!:,-,.. ._•,.,:.1,,t,!!,-1,;.,0•1,'il4flit,,i.,;..;,'„1,,',,,„li•r,,,,,,,,,lit••;.i.,;,,-:,7_„•,!•-••,,,,"-•',-,„!..,"s.:„7„,-„';,„:,, _..-:.•.,„..,....„.„,._•,•:::.......• . .,„.•,-....„,•.,„.• . ...,„„,... • .:,.....:,,,:•,,,.q.•-.• •',: . • ...,•.. ."• ."`••..•...1..".. .. •-': -•:••• :- •.•:••'••!1.",:. :,,,,,:'•••','.."...,,-,',1,,,,,,r1l!,,,!,111.$1,1,11,1":,„:,,•';i•1:::."'..=7:•,;: 4-:.:'4"!11,,IlliVI':"Ial.•'•I,i".!rvilill.?Iirl,,1!„,1:•,;ii,',It!,....,••,;-'J...t•,-.—...'...".•'''••'-•-,'".-!`....- :.:: '1,'•'":" •'".••.,' ..,.., . ... ... . . „,......,...... .... ........ .. ' '"'"'"''-'",: .•..'"':',1",,li'l': '':••••:;:i6''''''''''1,.'''''',:i!!'',!!i:11::'110111',111glli$1:?.1i!''':.:'1.1:11,4:::;-,,0:10';:.f..::`,.,-...;;,4`;.111:;Bil-it•I''..'1::'•;:.,,,1111,!1,,'!;':.:.,i1!1:10:ifli'i'.t:3,;;;Inii:P:(:':. .i,:'.''7:.....,:....-•,..: .''''.:.:.•••:."''''''.-•.'..'..:.,'":'''', ,.'..':.:''::::'.:'•;,:•;':,.'',,'-.''''."..:•''.•.-'::',.''''',::rj.. ' .... '.'":'..'::'•••:•::•''..'..-".''!:'...,:'.."":".:.:3:ili'":!...,:::::""::'.:&::illi:11,14.'!1.1...110,1t,iiit.''',.1.01',...'''l[',..irl'•,. .;''';'!'•:'-'-:*•'.';..,„_,-1'.-";'4,,u,!1.'1:;„1..',:'1'''.'1.'0116r'''',1:,":..1":1',..i.',,.1::'',.:''''''I''''.'JP1,,,Ii:'::1'.E,'',4',11,,,;',!'''''!..:'''''..;,::.•,.",:!*:',.1';'•i'l'.'1'''--;'*:,'!.:''''''''':H''''''','',72'..::5::.'""..•%"':::::•',---1 :••...,„:.••::•,,„::,•',;•,,,.....• • .:••• •. .. ..,•,•••,••,•.- ..,1:.•..:•-••• •••,...,,,! „,•,..:!.-•'.••••:::„'•••,'1••?1-''','.'1!:!,'"::.',111••••'',1104'4.,i,l!if:-',1•••'.1'.A'",•:::.'-..!;-:•'.'•"1.-'1.,:-,'''''•''•_•'',,,r11.'.1.,;!Ill'...#11',:,1•1?.,11,tif,',141ii.1.!1,:.1t,•','"i'jl?r:".... •!:•''',:„1:-"..'i,,;•.!1,,:i.„,',•'-..:,,'•`,.....,7.•!!i„:•;i:.!';i:•,'-:1,,i:i:!,•i!,,,.'•,.'-''.,.:',•,•"_rs:•;'•). .,••..........„,..... '. ,...•••,",:•.'.:•• •.•-•• • • • _,•••.••..,••••.• •••••!!,•.,••'••!•,.... ••••••,,,....,.... •,•"••1::!!i,.,•.,...,.•...„..•'...--'•-•,'••-.--.•''''':,'„q•••,•,!,•..!••.1,,,11!.1!',,••N,J10t)11•,,,•.!,.-;,2,,-:•.•,„•,„--,•iii*,•hk,11,.:„,,,oli,d,,,,,,t..,!,,,,!!•1).1„1,,,,:.0.,:•.1.:•.....„:1,1,1....1,4.•i„,,,..t,J,,,,,,,,,'..":„.-:,-;,;',..,;.,:y.,4;,.,',,i.,,:..„r„...-..',..,,.:•,4„.•,,•,,,,•.:.•1,,.-.-,-.,,,li:•1;,J,n-t,p,..„,,-,•.,:••„...:,..,,-.„,:_f-•,1.,..,• :.....„.„..,!':•••.,"• :• ... ..-••••:.•••:•.•• •• :•.;••:.•••:.• ••:••!•::•••.- •"::•.•••,,.,,:....,,.,.•••-.,••'::.,-..-.„--.:-":"••:•••••••1!•••••,,:,,,::"7!..•:!5,,:•1!:,!,0!;',''''it•:,••'•,,'I'_-,;-.'•-7•4•,,l•f,„';"-,-.!_-•:',4:1.'.!'-',,'''iiii!•1,°.1'111.,;,-!.11,,,•!,!1,111.,i',;1-•:",--•••••••,',...11:1,.";••"4,••'..,',•••;',:i,o,?,gti.,•':',,..i,•',LH:,':iliS.'•!,,!1,-"•-•-•,"-it•I.1.,•"'''•• ."':,':•••-" ••••''''..•!j•,.1::..-•'.•,-".:•''....•.-:".""!'!""","•"-••!••!•:••••;:":•'....•! 5',0•,irit,%"-;•;',..-:-.r.i'.';'..:•-,.;•„-27.-_,;.`-'::.zr:::,--.;jkl14•:•E'l.:),-4-„,-.....;•;40::U.11'-i,•,:11:•:4i'lt,Ir41::-7i'lliF•*.-••1',,::'"'•Ii•i„.••;f:..11 .. . • ••• ..... •:•••,,•,,.:•..:::!........••.,!:]•:,••••••--- • •.• _••••• •':,:,,'! 1,$D'''..,...1,iill!',.','•''',•::.'"•.:::;•,i,",,',.'.'",,',.,•••,,,'J'•':',A,1•!•••,.*:',..---•-.--.-"",-.1',:--.;',:::•;1'i.:-:",111.,!i••111.1.0'f.'h'''.-7...,,,:,z.1..„,:*.z .r.•,,,i.„•:„11,1,-,,,,,•:••1',',.,•,:.',:li`Y.f.,,,...,,L,1;11,•,•',111!•,, . .... ,• ':.",•:,,',:•..,'•p,•:,::!:1„,'0,0,4:.,,,I.,,•,!•'1,,•,,,,••;..i,,:•,!,•,,..,•••••.•„i,„:•.;,•„.„-....•:„..,„:7:'.-„,:71.,,:„ ;:,!„.,:.4.1.,:•.1.t,•,11•01•!„,.'i'l••,;,...,T$.-',14,!:•11,1'1',114,'-,,--- `',I;ifig!.1:!,=...,',!,41,1:,!"..• • .':"',..'.:'.1.",!:',!':,,•".,•••,...:•,:',..,.',,........... •••••1,.•''il:,,,4',t„i,:',;,'„!;',!,.!:.„,.:•,,,,,:.,,,...-....!''''.••,',5.i,11:1'.., ,ifl,1::r''''..,-,f,..,tlille•-.'•,'!Ni4,,,I•1,,....iiill',0-..„1.110,Z:.;.:.•:' .•. • . ...,.•..„....., • • .......••..,...b.:,,,oll!,,,,,,."„1.••:,,1:•:•,•,,,:•,,,,::,::::...,,,!,::•,•:.•::.....•,,,..,,..;••••'•11,,•'11,1,:'1'1:1,1,41,1g- .,!,",'7•:10p„,,,,ii4.----1,..1.iip,111,,,i1,,•,,,f,.,,,I,,r.„,-.,.....,!',,,i10.,!„,,,•,..',.il!fill1.111,,,,,,,,,,,. -. .....••••..,.......... • • •:''.,.!iL!,.:.......••'•••...,•.,••:••":„.",:,,,!,,:!•",,,i11.1,„,:„,•!;,,,,!,,,,!,,;',,,,,!,„'•,'-:,...,,....„:,44!•".,!',',:,1,'..,•,,,,'•,,,,...,11,,t,.,',.,!,!!!,,:'.,.:','-•••,,...!,,,,..„.-,,,!,,,,,,..1„.,,,,,..,' .. „ . ..„..„...• .„„„.,,,..„.„...„ ., ..,„.,...•...,„,..,•,.... •••• •...... ....„....„,.... ..„...,.. ...„,....... .. .. .. ,„.. .... i '.,•''''''!.;Ii.'lli"ol!i,''' •1:- ..":•:'.:•••••:••,...• : . ". ."':':•'.•'.:•Hi"..,..,,..„'••"--.... ..).,',.!:,„..!..?..:T-.',.,,,,!:„,,':....• •:,',1:!•':!:..••Ii::,..;, •,'....• :'•.;-:' '•!!'•t•'..,,....•.,,,,,,,•,,'.4'•.''''0'',1[::i.',',:i.,0..:'•C,''''i:':'...,•':::',40"k,. • ' ••••''4'.iO:ii:•'.....'„ • . ., ,„„!„,:..„:„,„:„.._ ...........„....,:,„,,..„.„:.,,I.,..._ :::.•,•.:,„..." ......„...--....„...,„„ •• -•••••••••• _ ,:••"• ,„,..•-....i:•••• , . .„......... ... ....„,„,..... .. „ •.'•••••,•,,..,..: ••„):. fl!!1••i•••,..,•:..i., Ui.•.•'...-,.,., .-'....46,,',„.„..„......—.'•••••••••• ... ,. „ •„„•:• ••.•„.....„.. .... .. •,"":. .„....... • „. ., .,...: . ;..„ .„1,,i,4iit..."•„.,,,.•„,..„.„,,,.-:.„ •.,..,:....•:- • • .,. ...... „..... .... • .: „:„..„.:,...... . ., ....„.. . ...., ••• ..... .. . ... ... .1...: ...... . .„.... .. ..... • .": ' • • .. . .. .,. . .. . . . „.. , :::. ,„ .,.:1„..:11.•••*r ,:••“:4:••.:•••r.`"•'-.0„•'...:•1••.'„'..*•:.•:'," .. ... .. : ..,. ''''''''• . ••-•••'-•••••,1f. ...,..k.„..„-••• ••";••'• ... „. "••••'i'..::„..,.."A -::„.•"„••',0„:„,„:-.!'::,'"'..."'"..'-. • .. ,.. ....1.;,...."'N,,,,:•'••!„.„KI,'.n...., •1,...,1„',,,.,„:1.. ,..,;„01„....",,"•,:.7. -')4,i,.,..1:•.•:,,-,-.,:„.•„,„:••,•. '••,,,::•.0.--,•,•••••.:Itioi.„•••••....;;,,, ,,,, .,:,,„..,,g.. ',".:,,14'.•,Ailt[:"..!!,•,;1!'llij•••. ",'''.•'; P,'"•,•1,•••:.;',••::'',1.•1:1',„:",',1,;•,:115'•••;'"'iy,1".r,,•iei' .,.•11: -__•-,."-1,'••' ,:-. 'illi'l4.:•';'''•••:,i,,,j":,,".•'1.'„!..!•!"'..''1.:!.•,"..'':'' '.-•':."-••1•„.. --' : "..„'.... -. •.•.,•••,.'',Ini:1110121,•,F.;i1"r,';',t•',if''''-•.-,:-#`''''..-..-',:".L.44,;','„ ,.••••,,4;•4,,,,:, ,::',,n,..„•;.1,',.,1'7,',-,f,,4,',,,:,..,..::'..'''" '74,..''..:•!1•"i'k'''ILT;.1.,..',;:i..: .......,•••• • ..„,. ,..,„ .• ''''''':',;,"y,'''''.i ...,st n.,:,•,1,7...•...,:.... - •:„:•.•...... .. ,.„,,..,..:.•- .-;:.--- :1:,,:•,•:,'...•,..i'...:•."".:1:,,:•..„1.1:,:itl,,l'Artf,r,o.•,••,•--:4.i.F..„..'-.•,,'-..„71*0-,''"-,,...;t:„•,,.•.,,,..•;„(0...4i,ittp?,,, :,...,,,,,.,•::.,,,r,.,'•'!„."'.!.,...[:,1,,',-.',A:A.i,,,lh,,,i,., •' ,........„..„.. ..,.„.„.•• . .:•-.,.. • . ..::•,*,,,,.... . ..v...,--.','„,.,• •,:,,,u,:,„:,',:,,,,,,,,,.„....„,,...,..,A,„1„,,•••,,,-,,,:•:•:••••,,..., - ..••,•',,,:',1i,A10111111L.,,..,,,,,,<, „,..,,ot....,,.... ,_....,,.. •„,•....,..!!!,:„,.,..0...,•„.....,.i,,,•,....„,„i ,,....?....,...,:...„,,,;,;11„,t,J,.,,, ,.13.1.,..,,..,...,,I.,x,,,, .; "''''''T"'L :",..'a..,•-••.. • ."' •- • 0.,„,1•1,...,,,,,,,,••,,,ii::,,,',....•,,,,..„.!,,J.,„,.,,,,,11,h4,7„... .. ..__.„,, ,_.,,,... ,, ...,., ...•,, ....„..• ••• •,, . • •.'••••,.4, • ' ....:.''.'115."4 .'.4.;t'41 7:Pi'...'''.'''..:::- ••.=,' -.,,,.. m. „---.. - '' ..,...:,.., — . . ' '1'1'''' ''t ' ' .' ''''''''.' '...-':..';':"'"'"I'41"''''''''''''•'''''''''''''''''1"••:':"!::''''•'::'::• '•:....''' .-''''''"'Aili"11!':'•."'•',4i:'''''.1.,.,11,014::.W.,410ir.'.''''.".0:1,•ri::,".'1::•141(; :••,•,;101 '••""'' '• - . ••'..,•• „-•'. •H ......,..... . . •"..:•:. '!!:,'":"'"4...:::*.r-.. "-"'''''''...: .':. ..sii.-i•'1,..,.. ... ..,'.'"''...,.7..' ' ..'''."''''''..i.S,'''',4,,,,';''.:i!if!•:!!!:,.!!:,,.1H...1,$::1,::5..!..!:!i!'',..:...,....:...,:.;::,.....:,,,,,,:;...i'.,:;.izi,„04.1,11,ii.l'1,:•014441'1,•,').i..i.JP;r,,:'.:'.;1,:,.''','!,.;,',.,',..',i,.....:14'4:4.,!.!1'.1:11j,'...,..•-•«"-f...'!,".,,,?*;!.::•.),r ,-....... .. ....:..4...... „,... .• . - ' 'Weli4IPPPC'ItAr,,1 ' ' '- -":'' '..-..'•'. '•• •"" •-.'''''':''•'•:'::.':.''I''"4':''.:!!':'•''''-:,•!!!:•-4',11!!•111:.:'11,.!!.,.':...,..'...:i,:!..:...'i.'174,Vik,,'-'11111001,11!:,,ItilliiiO4;f:PO',",i'n"?'''..4:"Z.2'.::''':..':, .,•i•••••-.4•,L.-..•-,-.41°':'"'" •-••..•,„,„.t . •••.., ..,„.,....„ • ....,!.,1.1;!..7,',...1:•'''''litt*:•':!.'...' ' ''''''''. --••''''•:'!':::-••••..,!•••,,,•:„.,,•.•:',„•,,..„.••:•:••,.„.....,••••,••:i,••,:!!!„,.!•;,:li.„1Zii,;1,••,•::1„,411,01,,,,P1!.-,41•0,.,,,,:!,,:••,.00,••,,,,,„.0,::•:,-,,,:..-,.,----dr.,•,,,,;,,,,4.„ "''.,•,. . • . „.,,..,....... .- '•••.•.•,L:.:.••:•.,:;••:','••'....•,..;.;•••:"•,..,.•••••!:1',,,,,!!,1,.;:rill•I,,!,.:,,'111:.:,,,,,.,,,.11•„..,,•,.1,[..!.1,:::.::.„:.,:,..,,,,,,,...,,,,,:i.,,i,.;.1,-,.i.,.,,..-...,•_,..-.._,,,.-„,, ,....,._.•-.,,, .,,',..,•,-,....." ...,..' ,.:v.,-"..,,,:;,.....i.3:-,„:'."''.„,'•••„,..,.'",.1.;,.,' • ....... :•..."..!,,,,„6110.-,,, „ •••••• •••1.!:•4',.1. :‘4.- ----,..,k.::,••.:":".'-••••••'•••.''•••••!'-',,--••- •,• .••••••„•••„- ••••:',,•:'''•!••••• ."••••••'..„'.,"!'•,,,...,•'•,,:',Ii. ..,.-• --'-'- ,•, ..,.••••••,,,,,--' -•!"•,,•,,L,.".'„.".-•,,,',•'•:':-•,•,••••,••••••: , . _ __.. . ..,• „_... ,..,.•,••,• •_ ....., .... .... ....... ............. ..,.... ..... .. .. ....... . „ • •'• •••••::••.,:::',-':',:•,•':••••..:!1•:.•!1.,•,1,!1,,--.:::•----1.4,•,;4,,L.,•••••••.•-:,'-:.-101,,,,40-•,.,,v,1,,,,•••„..„..,!:,,..:,:,,,,,l,„.„,••!,•,-..-.,,,,,,,I!,11,!:„,..-,„;•• :.••'.•,•!:••,••••",,,.„,•;.,•_-_„•„-•,...'1',!•,,,•::,•,.'•,,•••i," '•-.••;;I.,,•:•:',,1!•,!!:,••“•.,----•-•,'-':-:•'•''.••':,'•'"•',1-....A01',.111:••'•.•':.•••,,,... ••.........,„"•••••.••:,. •• ••'•- •..-..,.„-...„„•11.•,•••::ir)'..:,••:: „•"•,,:',.,!":f..,,,J.!1,,„7„-...-_,-,••••.....•••:;,:•••„„--•.:•,4hi•-•,,,:,,::.• "•••:::••:,:;,,,•:••'::••,•,.'.•:••••H•••:..-• , ,L.,:-„,-4,•,!:,..!!^.... 1::%•••.---,1,.,i1g"..,"'ilk'''•-••-••,',:!..g„,,,,, :'-'-',.:'•':•:•'.''''''',,,':''''''''"'"4.,!:':.• "•:' ' '• - -•••:::::••'',',,,•',1.11,,,,,i,:!,:,111,11-"--...:,••1111r!;:!•1!,,,114.•,:-'!h.,',1,:,:i;',,4",,4!.,,..'-...,",,,!:11:':'..11!!!.-.'.,!ir.„!!!,!'",•:. . ..,. ' '.''.:.•••'.'..:''"'H:'.':':J,'',...".•••••,..''.'''',','''''..."... T.i..ii;,1.:',Ag;';'''''.:",'!:-:,.!1:,111;:el!''i,ii.i4.'li;''''',-'''''i:'.1;,i.i".M11'!'... .. . •••..:...„,.....:„...„.. ...,... ••„,,,,,,',11,,!1!1„i$..,,,!!.','-':!..,,•"•• ' ''''..,:',:••i',11, '":-..:'"17.•,..11';1 !"1!'''..771!1:'''''''::'•1"1':"''''''''''''il'Ill'''''''''''''',I,''' '-'11:•.::''''""'N'ivillrn";-',..,:114!:!•:of-„,,,,,,0101h11':'":' ' ..•••''.::...".:••"••,',H.,:,:„."•„:"..',!••!,•'•',,.,..,,..,,!':,i''''',i,••,',;:'':''','!:":.".:.'",".'',.••';',:l$,'i;f!,:i',',';',.-;-''''11111•','',!10014.''•,',101''''ir.,1!•105'".'-":"Yliplii.!1!,;,:'.:.'"'..,• .... .•••,...„.!••••,,,,.:••„,,,••;•'“:,,,,,,,I,•,,.,:',.,,,n.- .'"-•...;-••,:•:1'',:nn,',-"•.i,,,'`q,,,,,,,A11,,,'•,•:::".-',11711'",,;',!,,,4".,:',I10.';,',1. . .• "..',••-•••••'"",kto••,••::,,,:',...•-,-.,,,,,,..,,,iil Ai;,•••••„:i..,,10!:,1:.",',,,,t!!,:,,,,!•,,Ilipti:41.Q,:t•-2,11,:V''!t•,•' : .• •,:••...:"•••.":'':!••"':' :'''„5•.!':''1:.:'''''''' '-'f';',••;..1''''''."1"-",;;!1'.,,:::'•,.11!':::•••"''''.•f`'..1!!:1,..V'Iri'',.r".-'''','.'-'j''''''',1•11':" . •. •• ••.:•,-".•••••••,,,..•• .,..,• .. . ,•••:..,,......,,,,,,,...,„..„:..,„...•,•_.-„i,,,,,„„„..,,-,.••••••, • • ' 1,„, •, -•...„. , ,, L r LOCATION .., ... .....„ ... .,....„..... .. „.:. .....„... .......,„....,..•. „. .....:._ ....„... ...... ,.. ... . . ..„....„. .. .... .. „.. . .ir.ikr'..i.K...ING i'll',,•RTI1 TO PROPOSED SHELTER LC-cATI.,.) „ . ., . - ' ... . . """ AT&T Wireless Services Proposed Facility Vistoso Golf Maintenance AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES Site Photographs and Photo Simulation AT&T WIRELESS SITE ; TU 89 MAINTENANCE FACILITY 2 - m - r' a M t '''', -„,,:..-,,i, 7.00,.. , . ,, ...wow. if... ..i•--'-'4"--' , *-.*' It' ' :-"..4.--).-, *.,11P'c, . ....-s ..- ,.* * , , .. * „...ec Sc- a , ,_,ate _ .Z' " ,£ k �# -IA—. Y , k 9 PHOTO SIMULATION OF NEW EQUIPMENT SHELTER AND FLAGPOLE Tyr Photo simulation prepared by TynanGroup,Inc. ,:,.-,—:: AT&T WIRELESS SITE : TU 89 MAINTENANCE FACILITY .,....e,.:71$ r , . .o- F r w3.> +s 0 f-r:::'---- '''''''----- '''''''''' -- -.--.'--:,„,,,iikv._ -- - _ *---;'--„,-:& , -:'..-,' -:----,-.`.- .;,''.- .?---''.- . -- -...,4-. :-.-_-...-;. :-.,..,4z,-;; ., ,,.,_,,,,,-_-....-„,.,--.,---:„,c-:„.Na F a PHOTO SIMULATION OF FLAGPOLE Tg 1)11anf;r0,P Photo simulation prepared byTynanGroup,Inc.,,,,—.. ,..,— AT&T Wireless Services Proposed Facility Vistoso Golf Maintenance AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES Site Plan and Survey irl": AT& T W I R E L E S S SERVICES 0AGRA Infrastructure, Inc. ENGINEERING GLOBAL SOLUTIONS 2001 WEST CAMEO AOC ROAD SUM 430 PHODC.ARtZCSA 0501S iiii0‘,,,, , -,,,,,, MAINTENANCE FACILITY ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL CONTAINED HEREIN ARE THE PROPERTY NORTH \ OF THE TYNAIR GROUP/ATkT AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED.USED OR DISCLOSED WnZ!,1 THEIR WRITTEN CONSENT. PREPARED FOR: ARCHITECTECT/CONSULTING TEAM I PROJECT SUMMARY AT&T WIRELESS N. \ 2398 E.CAMELBACK RD STE 1100 ` . OWNER PHOENIX,ARIZDNIA 85016 R`�tLOo OWNER roit , \ VISTOSO GOLF PARTNERS, LLC irtji \ 1121 W. WARNER ROAD #109 SITE LOCATION 955 W. PEBBLE CREEK \ N TEMPE, AZ. 85354 TUCSON, AZ. 85737 \ ` (480) 831-2000 JURISDICTION ORO V.heU.C4,ARIZONA TynanGroup \ \ ZONING RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY \ CONTACT: JOHN BEERUNG Real Estate Development Services \ BUILDING CODES RD 85018TE 108 \ ' N N APPLICANT UNIFORM BUILDING CODE : 1994 UBC 111 \ TYNAN GROUP NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE : 1996 EDITION p REDLINE CHECKLIST 3333 E. CAMELBACK ROAD Nse PHOENIX AZ. 85018 UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE 1994 EDITION y , \ �!�, PHONE: (602) 522-2655 UNIFORM FIRE CODE : 1994 EDITION �\ FAX: (602) 522-2660 1 \ CONTACT: )4.KU E HOLD ZONINGGATE ` qof0• Z3sLTE ACO. DATE PROPOSED EQUIPMENT OCCUPANCY NsJ, N ARCHITECT/ENGINEERING SERVICES (UNMANNED TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT AND ANTENNA) CONSTRUCTION DATE WATER NONE S1�_\ CD \ \ AGRA SIMONS INC ELECTRIL SUPPLY TBD TECH OPS. DATE 4\ 2001 W CAMELBACK RD. o Q_c.� \ PHOENIX AZ. 85015 TELEPHONE: US WEST \ PHONE: (602) 995-3916 GAS: NONE R.F. DATE ti %' v.�jj N FAX: (602) 995-3921 ' ((J�"" \ CONTACT: MIKE FORSYTH SUBMITTED: \ \41 i\ �` l�C, THE PROPOSED PROJECT INCLUDES N REVISLONs �sp,s� �` 4NN SURVEYOR 1. INSTALLATION OF AN 11'-5" X 20 EQUIPMENT SHELTERDESERT MANTECN2. INSTALLATION OF A NEW 3-SECTOR ANTENNA N \ DOGWOOD N. DOGOD LANE ON A NEW STEALTH FLAGPOLE. FOUNTAIN HILLS, AZ. 85268 PHONE: (480) 837-7856 3. A NEW 400A ELECTRICAL SERVICE TO FEED NEW STRUCTURE N FAX: (480) 816-6522 4. A NEW TELCO SERVICE TO NEW EQUIPMENT SHELTER. CONTACT: TOM CRAFT LEASE N 5. INSTALLATION OF NEW CMU WALL SCREEINING \• BUILDER 6. INSTALLATION OF NATURAL DESERTSCAPE LANDSCAPING SITE AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES. PCS SITE LOCATION / AREA DRAWN BY: If IRREGULAR \ AT&T PROJECT OFFICE 1230 SQ. FT. 2398 E CAMELBACK RD SUITE 1100 CHECKED BY: PHOENIX AZ. 85016 LEASE AREA: IRREGULAR 1230 SQ. FT (.027 ACRES) lKAf PHONE: (602) 224-2688 SITE ELEVATION: 2939 CLIENT �R I FAX: (602) 224-2960 GPS LATITUDE: 33' 27' 08" TU 89-2 \ CONTACT: BILL COOK GPS LONGITUDE: 110'58' 48" \ ) HAD: 27 Sin N EXISTING MAINTENANCE FACILITY Sin , \ MAINTENANCE FACILITY \ RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 11 ' SHEET INDEX VICINITY MAP ADDRESS AL SITE ADossI 0 N. RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY 9555 V. PEBBLE CREEK SHEET TITLE TOCSIN, AZ. 85737 \ Z-1 ZONING PLAN, PROJECT DATA, VICINITY r�o 05 SHEET TITLE MAP & SHEET INDEX so H1GNtAN I Z-2 SITE PLAN ct SHEET INDEX, \ Z-3 ENLARGED LEASE PLAN AND ELEVATION LOOKING WEST '°Fgee� cam,, PROJECT DATA, C-1 TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY CQf�� cm o VICINITY MAP, ■ SITE DETAIL& (THE FOLLOWING DRAWINGS ARE IN CONSTRUCTION PHASE) �� _ ELEVATION ) , S-1 STRUCTURAL NOTES AND FOUNDATION LOCATION PLAN o 0 0 S-2 STRUCTURAL DETAILS `D ( SEAL I 111111111 E-1 ONE LINE DIAGRAM, ELECTRICAL SPECS. SITE PANEL SCHEDULE. SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS I / E-2 ELECTRICAL SITE AND GROUNDING PLAN TANGERINE RD `.vgcP ; E-3 ELECTRICAL DETAILS E-4 ELECTRICAL DETAILS g SHEET NUMBER / M / ZONING PLAN SCALE: 0 30' 60' 1 7_ V114 lopp 1 N \`N infra�stAGRA ructure, Inc. \ `� ENGINEERING GLOBAL SOLUTIONS fillO 1N.N.. \ `\ 2001 P►►D CM 3Aa(R Axiom sum 4.10 \ X. `\ on FIX( )moo 3 e ` \• '\ ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL ► ` CONTAINED HEREIN ARE THE PROPERTY OF THE TYNAN GROUP/AT&T AND NORTH , N` N\\\ \ W`\ RETHOUT A THEIR WRITTENO CONSENT.SEDY NOT 1 N.,\ `� PREPARED FOR:-� -� AT&T WIRELESS `�� N. \ `�� PHOENIX, N2398 .0 I CK STE ARIZONA 1100 N 117, ,,,, .N, , ., N, \ N. TynanGroup \ N�ITj Real Estate Development Services 04 ' N Ss1s 3PHOENIX,ARIZDrW &5018TE 108 \ N. , V ► �` \, �\ INTERNAL REDUHE CHECKLIST N ► \ ,�� `5 ZONING ? N 1S\ N, NDATE m �� \ `N, SITE ACQ. DATE \ EXISTING TRANSFORMER PAD 'N. \ N,,_ \ CONSTRUCTION DATE N ► PROPOSED NEW STEALTH FLAGPOLE r.—/ P Qz �� \\ ` PROPOSED NEW BURIED COAX CONDUITS • ;; PROPOSED NEW BUR�B,POWER CONDUIT �� TECH OPS. DATE 7� PROPOSED NEW BURIED TELEQ CONDUIT ► �' ♦ \�\ \ N N. `.. R.F. DATE ` \ SUBMITTED: ` LEASE \ \ N. REVISIONS ► y \ „\ N� / DATE SUE ,s� loll '\ .\ 1230 SQ. FT. SEE ENLARGED LEASE sji . \_ \ N \ 10 SITE ON DWG Z-3 ' \ \ �. -PROPOSED NEW AT&TWS N. \ N. 11'-5' X 20'-0' X 10'-1" HIGH ',, \. PCS EQUIPMENT SHELTER N \. �� `\` \ \ \ N. PROPOSED FACILITY PARKING N, CHECK BY; MI ► �\� \� \ \ \, CHECKED BY: �_ \ 1 .\`\ \ \\� \ CUENT NUMBER I • \ 'N , \ „N.., '\ 'N TU 89-2 ► '\ ` `\N. \ \ 517E NAME , \ `\ \ MAINTENANCE FACILITY 111\ \ \.\ E\\ \ SITE ADDRESS \ 9555 V.PEBBLE CREEK N \ TUCSON,Al 85737 s \ ` \ SHEET TITLE �. r� f \ SITE PLAN ` C $ $. $S►� SEAL I SHEET NUMBER I g SITE PLAN SCALE: 0 20' 40' 1 Z-2 1,.=30'-0' � V104 r , ®AG RA �CIO � EXISTING TRANSFORMER PAD Infrastructure, Inc. j ENGINEERING GLOBAL SOLUTIONS %� 2?• 2ca VEST cMfssAOc Rao SLfiE 430 �0• PHODa.A1�ONA s601S PHONE 11(eQ2 �1 e 1/' ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL * �S• CONTAINED HEREIN ARE THE PROPERTY NORTH OF THE TYNAN GROUP/AT&T AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED PROPOSED NEW STEALTH FLAGPOLE J. WITHOUT THEIR WRITTEN CONSENT. (0', 120'& 240'ANTENNA AZIMUTH) \ Ni/1 `O- : `-- EXISTING TREE PREPARED FOR: ,� /,,•�/ ,� I PROPOSED NEW BURIED POWER CONDUIT AT&T WIRELESS / 2398 E. CAFELBACK RD STE 1100 cb ' ( , % �� �� PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85016 PROPOSED NEW BURIED COAX CONDUITS , // �, t� / �,, PROPOSED NEW BURIED TELCO CONDUIT if EXISTING TREE i ,'� ��/ ;/ AC UNITS (TYP TynanGroup O / I/ ,� , Real Estate Development Services 1a' SHELTER EN TRA CE J/ 1\ I; RDPHOENIX,ARIZONA E 1QTE 108 � LEASE �, _� , ,,, v. INTERNAL REDUNE GHEGKLIST SITE " - ♦1230 SQ. FT. , ZONING DATE �I 4 PROPOSED NEW CMU SCREEN G SITE ACO. DATE II111111411 - PROPOSED NEW AT&TWS 00 r 11'-5" X 20'-0" X 10'-I- HIGH CONSTRUCTION DATE PROPOSED NEW 12' WADE GATE II I ' PCS EQUIPMENT SHELTER ,II . �.•-� TECH OPS. DATE `� EXISTING CMU WALL R.F. DATE PROPOSED FACIUTY TECHNICIAN PARKING ' SUBMITTED: REVISIONS ! EMI ISSUE J t>7.. sr* 11 DRAWN BY: I ' CHECKED BY: CUEI NUMBER PROPOSED NEW STEALTH FLAGPOLE TU 89-2 (0', 120'& 240'ANTENNA AZIMUTH) COLOR MATCHED TO SURROUNDING FACILITY ENLARGED LEASE AREA PLAN SCALE: 0 10' 2 SITE NAME , 3/16"=1'-0" MAINTENANCE FACILITY AT it, • SITE ADDRESS I — EXISTING CMU WALL (BEYOND) 9555 V.PEBBLE CREEK — PROPOSED NEW CMU SCREENING TUCSON, AZ. 85737 —PROPOSED NEW AT&TWS TO MATCH EXISTING WALL 11'-5- X 20'-0' X 10'-1" HIGH — PROPOSED NEW 12' WADE GATE SHEET TITLE PCS EQUIPMENT SHELTER TO MATCH EXISTING GATE COLOR MATCHED TO ENLARGED LEASE PLAN I SURROUNDING FACILITY. I AND SECTIONAL ELEVATION _,' ► LOOKING SOUTH-EAST j // L� I IIII fir ifir III li( I�TI I �- 1 1 1 1 1 milli f i I III , I I 1 1 I ( ( 1LI �� _ w : MIMI1I1111111 (( I _I � I I i I I I I _ZII I O SEAL I I r 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1Ii . i '1-" f-111-111gii-al'III IHIf=:il lltlT �� I(' COAX CHASE - _!i 1 —I 11-1 11�I -1I SHEET NUMBER I 8 ru SECTIONAL ELEVATION LOOKING SOUTHEAST SCALE: 0 5 ) Z-3 3/16"=1'-0" V104 4L.,,lAD ,CLu,v „ p5 Mnntech W�'` 15020 N.Dogwood Lane LINE BEARING DISTANCE Fountain Mites, A>Z 852 8 \ L1 S24'44'29 W 10.22' telephone 480-837-7856 L2 N65'44 29 E 5.17' L3 N65'3534 E 26.82' �o4' • cte' 1 ‘ L4 N24'24 26w 10.00' N L5 N65'35'34 E 18.00' • L6 N30'5729 E 23.93' \, ��'' IIII SITE S ill CCONTAiNE EO,.�ARE THE PROPERTY \ \ N L7 N59'02'31"W 10.00'r Y OF DESERT wxrec,i ANC)MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED.USED OR DISCLOSED WIThOUT L8 N30'57 29 E 10.00' TMG£R/NE RO THE wRMD+CONSENT OF DESERT M Ecu. ,; L9 S59'02'31 E 10.00' ^^ /� �" \ L 10 S30'57'29"W 5.00' L 1 1 S59'02 31"E 22.00' / f ,�P N \ ` L 12 S30'57'29"W 32.00' / °^1 �a N N \ L13 S65N24'19 24"W 27.98' h X Vicinity Map L14 N24'2426"W 9.98' AT&T R=66000_ Lease Site Legal Description d=A�55�6 �0 <9 x ATXt Wireless Service, l a 10.74' \ �a� O ♦ A POR770N OF THE NORTHEAST CU.W/ER OF SECTION 26,TOWNSHIP 11 Suite 1100 East Cemelbeck Road yy ! _ SOUTTi RANCE 1J FAST OF 7-HE G[A,NO SALT RIVER HOSE AND MERIDIAN Phoenix,AZ 85018 ,��'' t �) e,, PAW COUNTY,ARIZONA.ALSCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: \ .f y- / BEGIN AT THE MOST SIX/1}MFSIERLY CORNER OF NSTOSO RESORT C4SYUS R:BSO�' •y' " ,' �� AS RECORDED IN BOOK 49 Or MIPS Ate PUTS,PAGE 5,RECORDS OF PUq `�� d=591929 a ��`vvv COUNTY,ARIZONA,SUO POW'BENC ON THE NORTHEASTERLY LIVE OF PEBBLE CREEK ROAD;\ \�� L=8d16' i `� �� ti..'� \ A RADIUS OF 440.004 FEET A, p ISJ FINCH BEARS NORTH 26 NORTFAIESTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO EDEGREES 12 RIGHT ,! Jr� U'.I TOP 4E8 \ MIM/7ES J1 SECONDS NEST,A�NYCE OF 122 FEET"THROICH A CENTRAL ►'..� Y .�TOP 42.5 ANGLE Or 00 DEGREES 25yMIINUTES 09 SECONDS AND AN ARC LENGTH OF vie �, \ \ �q7p/v ,N�/ '� 122 F ISOIC DEPARTING sw moRPEAJTERLY Lit SOWN 54 DEGREES � V �' 00 4 TES Ob SECONDS NEST,A O57AAClE OF 40.00 FEET 1D A BRASS \ \ ti 0. ,�'' TOP 41.1 \ CAP 41495ING THE bCNIAIlE1NT LATE OF SAD PELZS<f CREEK ROAD THENCE �7 \ � �, \ NORTH J6 DECREES 00 MINUTES OO SECONDS NEST ALONG SAID MONUMENT Igi ..\ �T• \ TOP 44.5 LAl A DISTANCE OF 254.00 FEET ID A BRASS GP THENCE ON A CURVE ` � \ I / 70 THE LEFT MAW A RADIUS OF SOQW FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE m r ` TOP 40.6 OF 19 DECREES 15 MINUTES 0 SECONDS AFD AN ANC LOCH OF 167,99 POINT;THENCE NORTH 55 SECONDS TynanGroup ' / NE O24 T!NE 1/4 DISTANCE 10 A POINT;THENCE 50 H DEGREES �\ N SEC I T11S R1Jf L3 �13,.%" NOTHING FOUND OR SET 45 WOES CY!SECONDS NEST A AS AM E Of 40.00 FEET TO A POINT ON Real Estate Development Services I ° i e / THE SOU7IIN£S1DLY UNE OF PEEAStE CREE7f ROAD ANO THE TRUE FTANT OF ,., \ N °5 p / (-7-- E 414RSw OF IH£CENTERL/NE Of A ZQOO SCOT N10EACCESS/U71ITY sit E 18 ze0 A POINT; T HENC CON77N OF 10. 4ODIE 45 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST,A Ilk \ THENCE ON A CURIE TO THE LEFT/+I C A RADIUS OF 85.00 FEET THROUGH \ A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 59 DECREES 19 MINUTES 29 SECONDS AND AN ARC 'iJ� `G,s\ LENGTH Of 88.16 FEET IO A POPE(, \ 0 ''t,- THENCE SOUTH 24 DECREES 44 1/NTES 29 SECONDS EASE A DISTANCE OF �'A> 5.17 FEET TO A POINT; JUNE 23,2()00 �• \ DETAIL NOT 1D SCALEOF FEET TO THE POINT OF 7ETR�MTION OF THela NORM 65 DECREES J5!AWES 34 SECONDS EAST;A DISTANCE /U7TCF7Y EASEMENT \ AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING pEA LEASE SITE REVISIONS N. { l DATE 1 ISSUE THENCE NORTH 24 DECREES 24 MUTES 26 SECONDS NEST"A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET TO A POINT; N \ ` T7EINC£NORTH 65 DECREES.TS MIMES 34 SECONDS EAST,A DISTANCE OF ` \ 18O7fEET10Af�JWT, N CO C—/� THENCE NORTH 30 DEGREES 57 4+04/TES 29 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 2193 FEET 70 A PONT; n O O TFEIfE NORTH 59 DEGREES 02 INNTES J1 SECONDS WEST,A DISTANCE OF cn lace FEET TOAPONT,' O THENCE NORTH JO DECREES 57 MANTES 29 SECONDS EAST"A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET TO A POIV1, \ \� THENCE SOUTH 59 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 31 SECONDS FAST A DISTANCE OF O Cm/) 10.00 FEET TO A PONT \ R=S{0.(b' 1 O THENCE SOUTH JO DEGREES 57 MINUTES 29 SECONDS WEST,A DISTANCE OF d= 1915'A0" 5.00 FEET TO A POINT: =181.4J' D THENCE SOUTH 59 DECREES 02 M/N//ES 31 SECONDS FAST,A DISTANCE OF \ \ 0 \ Q 1100 FEET 10 A POINT ON THE NORTHWESTERLY FACE CF A MASONRY WILL: DRAWN SF: T.V.C. C!�y THENCE SOUTH 30 DECREES 57 JINGOES 29 SECONDS NEST ALONG SAID WALL A DIATOM f OF 32.00 FEET 7D AN ANGLE POINT IN SAD WALL CHECKED BY: C -I THENCE CONTINUE ALONG SAID WILL,SOUTH 65 DEGREES 19 MINUTES 24 SECONDS NEST A DISTANCE OF ?7.98 FEET TO A POINT; I CLIENT NUMBER \ NN N \ THENCE DEPARTING SAID WALL SOUTH 24 DEGREES 24 MINUTES 26 fND PK SECONDS NEST A DISTANCE OF 9.98 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF Lessor's Legal Description R= OO' ` d=19'15 AD" RAN7D IIsram DOD 1l,TRACT AL SEE SFECAL c=16799 g THE LIMITS OF SAID DESCRIBED EASEMENT SHALL BE EXTENDED ANO/OR TU 89-2 NIARRANIY DEED REGARDED N DOCKET 10272,PACES lA7B-1920 ta SHORTENED AT AXLE POINTS,ADN7S OF CUR/ATURE,POINTS OF TANGENCY, \ \ 8\ PLANT OF BEGINNING AND POINT OF TERMINATION AS TO PROVIDE THE I SITE NAME I \ \ D CONTINUOUS SPECIFIED WIDTH THROUGHOUT. -+\ R=460.00' O $-E�- d= 1915010" fT1 $� Benchmark L=rs435 `� cn MAINTENANCE FACILITY DPS CONTROL PONT ON NFROEEY SW OF PEW CAT( \.6 \ hTN0 AFRO IMATELY 225 FEET AGRhMB71RLY OF hg4�ESTER(Y I SITE ADDRESS , &RAN E TO GOLF COURSE MANIENNNCE FACILTY. \ 1 Date of survey ` 955 W.PEBBLE(REEK RD \ ELEIOAJXW 19J9.J4 NAKa68 \ '�� \ JUNE 21,TOOT OR0 VALLEY,ARI2p*N Basis of Bearing ��� \ Assessor's Parcel Number I SHEET TITLE I \� $ 219-22-01C PLAN CDLN7 7}E A0102N1ID CENTERLINE Cr PEBBLE CREEX ROAD, \ . MOM rIENIED AS SHOWN HEREON,AS BEARING NJ6 07 A711 \ \ ) \ �� \ Site Data TOPOGRAPHIC \ \ $ ELEVATION zszz9 SURVEY Legend \ , o \ y �� urnuDE Jn7•a6' / "Ilk \ �Q $\ NA027 0 fi4A5S CAP FLUSH \ $# % LONGITUDE 11058'48" n * FARE MAQWT NORTH y\'' =t SEAL 0 1ELEPPAI4E BOX \ Yn`� v 8 �.:'' E ELECTRIC TRAN5FOR ER $\ \ g`+ .LAN: 9L r. ANTAtE/CITCII EiISN Graphic Scale \Cen"t` Surveyor's Notes �tsx/ 3Z �( rts/EtEGTjwATER AETFR r \Z $N \ �y4�! -# X MASER GAS/ELECT/WATER /FALSE $ 122 kir,- 7 (In tat J '� \ ` REFERENCE I MADE TO A C7AWlTAI£NT FOR INSURANCE,, , CAC MALL ,°1 / \ 51O ORDER NUMBER FIRST Mara 0019813J,ISSUED BY FIRST ' -- o POLO BRAE TREE 1 inch = 30 ft. \ �cp• ��1 04 Au�61 1000 C.OIP4He AND HAVING AN EFFECTIVE , 84 o `� R=440.00• SHEET NUM/ .R ES NOT o 4 725 D9' THE LESSORS LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND RECORD BOUNDARY ARE 88 CHORD:11 J17v CONSTnUTE A BOUNDARY sHowN HERON FOR RUT:qt.-WE rHE LESSER rwts sawn'�RcwER1Y C mewl 2b J2J' I;'iESERT MANT-CCH NO. MT00-045 AT&T Wireless Services Proposed Facility Vistoso Golf Maintenance AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES Pima County Assessor's Map and Tax Sheet ASSESSOR'S RECORD MAP AREn-CODE 19-22 SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH , RANGE 13 EAST `�" 219-21<SUB) VISTOSO GOLF CASITAS II 219-53(SUB) \ / UN1T5 101-118 k 210-216 \y�� �\ • /GARAGE UNITS G101-C118 & G201-C218 FORMERLY S 89d 51' ./ 15278.68 ;LO) R=740 R=660�L zsz3.' R.150, 52/081 N•P (219-21) 202-2 3 I I 92 L=679.T'1' L=389.55• •=650 ` ./c•3`0.3 940,00 a 96.7,9''529, LJ 0 159.69 �.<.ja�as�V `SAD^ iVISTOSO WigRBI o. 6 , ., 1RESORT N z 74� ?,6 95.62 L=10.74 '�w CAS[TAS L=4+ t sS, �,5 1F, R.660' Leo UN S 101-186 R=75' -268 - b o,`Sy 'p &�O MON R=150.57 L=82.35 o 2h' '6c3 No �P.' .' OMMON L=17 00 c 4baga°.a._of)'t+JJcc, ..J l' 9-2)TS o b' 1 2' . + 9/00 o bo ��` h1`1 Z\Zg0 0. aMkP ci 1 G q`,2�' o° ° f V ``b b m '\ p� 1 n q. '5 \b t�`L I WORLDUARK, THE CLUB AT 1 2o�bbo ,� C I RANCHO VISTOSO Il ph'5' �wb o,p \\e42' ^ UNITS I01-181,202-204,208-208,210-213,213-220, • 1 q Pb �� • hh 223-225,227-29,231-248,250-258,258-280 ® \ 1 g0 Q- 4 h '5'b32 I & C001�ERCIAL y13355 & COMMON ELEMENTS \ R=150' po p�,`� R.1,��`Z 5 d�q 53/01 D=31I.96 rn S6• \50' ,2�`.' a I ♦\ rn ^ �-98 67356 � / 0 a �� C1�.85' �/ 247.55' ti 2So ,��o L �'o�so ,t:/ HIDDEN SPRINGS ;' 0 32' „� 9 R=510 / R=25' DRIVE o oo 'p`'�3 �N L=215.'6' rnt22eas• =39.27' o C�S1 66 , 9.?Ja3• ui R=3..39' VP (i ct `gymR=460' 3 r vt .0`�— -----to R=75' �ill l L=426.88' f�N "5 I , =T6.15' 9 o s o 6 .� 61 I r' a° 540 n o 0 90 ` ho^�1 876,\7' `U ti�0 R;AOA�Y I\ o . z s� a `°��p'3`� n R`\5109,I u LJ `9•/2' : I I o a 9'6?6� 3 CR.,j5o'639,90, 150'Q,'L's,>. o I Icu in R=75' 564.39' r�1-3,5 c^ I I O L-2063 ^ I I a RANCHO VISTOSO o ,q• I I SUNSET RIDGE II 11 o NEIGHBORHOOD 10 O 570.00 z LOTS 1-98 C.A."A" pima j 48/027 M&P County O3 I ` (219-53) assessor 0 I � 11 1 . trie Via...=04. CCS I I:\T11S\R13E\S26 -01/31/00 EA 1 --GC�DER -RANC4i F IRE. DISZ R1CT I — I `• --I 0 300 600 900 1200 S 89d 49' w 5276.04 COLO) T111326 -� FEET 1970-5 (2) r^ 2001 Pima County Assessor Property inquiry Search 2000 1999 Commercial Card Summary Order Tax Genealogy PARCEL I2192200 -m ..._.._. Appraiser JUANITA CLARK Supplemental Notice TaxYears: 1998 Book-Map-Parcel:219-22-001C TaxArea: 1012 TaxYear:2001 TaxPayer Information Recording Information VISTOSO GOLF PARTNERS LLC Docket 10272 Page 1908 Date 19960412 1121 W WARNER RD SUITE 109 Zoning Information ORV TEMPE AZ Miscellaneous 85254 0000 Section 26 Twn11.0S Rng13.0E LandMeasure 72.41 A Legal Description MarketArea: RANCHO VISTOSO(423) IRR PTN LYG NLY&NELY 72.41 AC Tract Block Lot GroupCode 000 SEC 26-11-13 CensusTract 4611 UseCode 2415 File-Id 1 Date of Last Change Mar-08-2000 18-36 HOLE COURSE PVT OPEN TO PUBLIC Secondary Valuation Data LegislativeClass FullCash Percentage Assessed Land COMMERCIAL(3 0) $36,205 25.0 $9,051 Improvements 1999 Personal Property Gross Value Totals $36,205 $9,051 1999 LMTD/SCND Exemptions Net Value Totals $36,205 $9,051 PriorLimitedValue: $362,469 CurrentLimitedValue: $36,205 Owner's 2001=$250,000 1998=8422,449 Estimate Appeals 2001—Petition 1998—Supplemental Petition, NoEC 1997—NoE Records indicate Delinquent Taxes may be due for Parcel 219-22-001C Pre-Supplemental Notice Valuation Data is Subject to Change untilAugust of 2000. Pima County Assessor—115 N. Church—Tucson Az. 85701 Client: —159.233.220.62 ttp://www.asr.co.pima.az.us/apiq/asrsg101.cfm?TAXCODE=21922001 C&RequestTimeout=120 6/16/00 R AT&T Wireless Services Proposed Facility Vistoso Golf Maintenance AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES FCC Letter of Compliance w 2AT&T AT&T Wireless Services Suite 1100 2398 E.Camelback Rd. Phoenix,AZ 85016 June 20, 2000 To the Town of Oro Valley, This statement is to confirm the proposed AT&T Wireless Services site TU-89 meets all FCC MPE requirements: Power density is calculated at 536.58 uW/cm2 at base of the pole. This level is 53.66% of the FCC limit for uncontrolled environments, or 1.86 times lower than the FCC limit. The composite power is calculated at 1500 Watts. The FCC limits for uncontrolled environments are: Bottom of antennas at no less than 39 feet. Composite power output of less than 2000 Watts. Meeting the above requirements also means that this site is exempt from routine RF exposure analysis by the FCC. Robert Hammersmark AT&T Wireless Services/Arizona RF Engineer USA PROUD PARTNER m 8 Recycled Paper AT&T Wireless Services Proposed Facility Vistoso Golf Maintenance AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES Adjacent Ownership SSOR'S RECORD MAP -53(SUB) SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH1 RANGE 13 EAST IB LY ;� I S 89d 51' v 15278.6 dLC R•740 R.66�Qp ts2.o•. R.1so• ,� • l 92 , L■679:71 L.3.105'' n66� \ ,,Z.��o.� 940.00 a. 96.7.9 '.`cos,.. 1 J 0' 139.69 ., + .5A� 'RESORT \ 1, * R. .. 4,2 It•bb q62 L•10.74 3 ►rw ASITAS 1t Y L'��''° �3•b 4°�� 1 F R+660'^�, �� e UN S 101-1001 O ,.` •, do 01-280 6q S ,R+150' 7 L.82.35 ay��i 6�86 '/�'s.• r� I.EMENTlif 41. 'i b 0 ®D' '1v% b1� 2\Z� `t Q1�IAcP 0 44 1:1# # - p' 1;! b p tli. @ , e 1 t' % a a �4. r 12 `g0 4^.✓ ,1h,L^� �2 ASSESSED WITH A PORT. tt \\ D•3It596 �p �a.Q-° �1 • Sp' +2cii 40 c 3",.4 C 25, TITS, R13E I \` �i ED )j� 6735b' Q•• R• MyI' a o. A5' 59r' %o c,,, l �• h a �1 L•229.'i�a oy 247.55' t�, .3. �'$03t� ri yy R=51 1' 3r '(; �o g 1Rr,3 s• L=215• R. • 39.27' m� '' v °sue 60" • ;; p9� a' 03 ,�0.36. .. `D 66. 4. `� h baq tvWV �.C_ �� P ZdD �=460' - h 430 ----.o R•75' v'r°�, LA426.88' •! ► • y 4O. +5AO n. o �T �� b I li 9,617• �' �. R�.AOQy Z j $ a b'O4,1,� o R}\�A 2Q < R- ,S a \,. RANCHO VI. ` _ 319,1Z' °' ou 40 _ II SUNSET RIf. ,1a 6'6o 19.1so• J9'90. 150' a.,,,P. g 1 NEIGHBORHI 2.,7 o I LOTS 1-98 0 ;2 6.3 564.39' • , Y %, 1 48f 027 M&1 to ° ; 570.00 1 1 I � (3 I 1 :r 0 ii is ,j =\T U GQLDER RANCH F IRE D1SZ R1CS .i�.t`. r :it^: ,. _,,•-,... rr-cam,^.:.,,,,., ,..-.•!^-.�1-A..J'� :rP`w.'" r."1. ,i c .r,a..N- . ,�.., . 1.r _ I— ( o 1'--- S 89d 49' W 5276 C' (GLO) Ti 1 1326 ,/ 6 KEYED NOTES: ® LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS: oAGRA VICINITY MAP Infrastructure, Inc. ENGINEERING GLOBAL SOLUTIONS 1. FURNISH MIIYYUY 3,/4'MINUS Pill DECOMPOSED GRANITE TO TILE EXTENTStspe el nary Ndrda el saw,!marl*eTpl+mmi,ad swims mown s has.rdaa / Nailed 2001 NEST CANEIRAOw ROAD SATE 430 PHOENIX.Maw ybpbb NORTH MOICATED.PRIOR TO PLACING,THE AREA SMALL BE TOTALLY FREE OF WEEDS. and 4•altid.IBA imdde,lid 1 nel Mali Ni,ode peparsthn,wA prammiN.,pad aeNvN Mnahl PRONE(R T2 9!S-3Nli DECOMPOSED GRANITE SHALL BE EVENLY DISTRIBUTED AT THE DESIGNATED NW bsalsNN%,sots era m i el WI alibi tomm•mans en Ni.Fraud Pap.*d nmdmtdil ad EAR IRozl�.s-�n, .1....„ � AREAS TO A DEPTH OF 2 RICHES AND 1 RICH DEEP AT PLANT PiTS.DO NOT PILE All DRAWINGS AND NWTTEN MATERIAL wohirtni el eel WOW slab ep le fire ease es sea 1Mer/h Hs µ~^Tao and nrtdsrla NIGH UP AGAINST TRUNKS AN STEWS.APPLY PRE-EYE NOETICE CONTROL ACCORDNIO MOO of CONTAINED TYNANGROUP/AT&T AN THE Y NOT BE DUPUCATED.IMO OR DISCLOSED TO MAFACIURER'S RECOMNOIOI1T101E AFTER INSTALLING DECOMPOSED GRANITE. moire YrB by we Milo grain(2r par er Haider)H ms H. e*ad eon on/thw a oe Neer mai In WITHOUT THEIR WRITTEN CONSENT. plwdYM wom owl ailed Ni WY yaw WINK. '`'ete LANDSCAPE ANDS OWNER UNfITOE BE$TABLISHREED AND ABLE 0 2. EXTENT Of mamma OWE. R�ORrsoy PREPARED FOR CD L., SUSTAIN ITSELF'ON REGULAR ANNUAL Oar Ilkel mil el hem add. AT&T WIRELESS . 4 s k RAINFALL E.CANELBACK RD PLANT MATERIAL: 2398 PHOENIX,ARIZONA 850167E 1100 Wit berried end preprlls.d,Ned mpb Was woe of flair nand psis.Ferman only wR-w1eYUAad e ealebwbd slab,nth pant MIgM,width end sew in wasrins alb Na Maas Nrawy AroodeRse p Outdsirnse Swards fa a than pant ad ame id se.a Al mowMesa is Ni mown herd. SITE c `� _ `V� 44f, ` � /�r,_ Nlhaga et� eh Nan eddllN..'Gawrwald'r med.cepa a OMRnl w eel,es M+�Tn%ow TANGERINE RD �O ��RO 3leRid"'*"'''d`" TynanGroup 1.° illIMUZER O O NOW.'pant lbw r qui eh guenamd Menial oelyes of 20-10-05(M-P-If).APp4 In Pad pM pis Real Estate Development Services '3Y Shndenl PMrdMp Wan. 3333 E.CANELBACK RD STE 108 y1 PHOENIX,ARIZONA 85018 ft T>flei 01ANN:.NNNNN, Clk lei(l1AimPbi ale,ni&nrw 3/4'dii..2'dry epplsRrr said a plefa wdesprrd,Apply pa-ammgrrl usdVk raril N Nis eyyUel..(Ns par b pawed it Jodi gmellow,w Ow Wm*crew ode peed e N i INTERNAL REDUNE CHECKUST 4- dillir& QO 4Qn,•I n ♦ i. y PRE-EMEIEEMi WEED COMiIgI 140 iR "OrNrl'v clad,wok N rwdanw dF wwAaduer'a awn.wweloMna TrwhrNrd N yids a d wes ZONING DATE fl ° .41t• '. awd th rnt ee4ar. ed pYy g w aindr srrhra mpNn a 4p a 4MM.�, SRE AGO. DATE Ram®o TPGLN^Roar LbreA Wisp Lamy APIeMal Eeleas Sweb(21S-11SD)Ir were Rndsw Iw spp6i u. rp na•2.a Aew AsumrXr `. ,. © CONSTRUCTION DATE f lANOlCAPE EIEL1tTI01N woo odd nnelsrial I.ssardese VIA Woolly Wispalad.nary pre°Nwe.Follow pilaw s per NM TECH OPS. DATE ° SNndwd PIaPeg Sar/en.The CrNedag Maw Nana Na rlpa I.mist Nee deM1ad In N.landrq. 1. acornaaEO Rena Y A •/� / , Bark Oki en net Ne cNry/elree eNN NN Wiwi Deumeda r are Osman ledgd Is Ni aelWea.This 0Alt O ARCAS• a TM AR PDC u ` ' / �`a Nrbdw peel rapleaeeaef(e1M Na ESNs pad type and Wi.)d Ne addIYNN Rant a Na waged. R F. DATE OM BANS -- �fr r r 2. PREPARE ma.AS IFEOrIm Si Z ♦ , OWAIJIiEE AND McNITFl1AlIGE SUBMITTED: ome • 0 I' !' 0 R 01111 ' / SO dal Bowe Ise and n sHlsee r fw eel pad^rarest escape dl loses a Berry as veer,wreelea x CDEPTH aITARE�ODIN,NICE ITM inNaft of 1M gum..ed mir.Mrsrea pride Mel rat°wEaawe unit deleted w nw-complytn0REVISIONS Igpr BALL `` rnarawD 1e"'� Nees of rat Nora bay emitted,ant NM fe leog mien infwewlhn s submRad a end apprsed by / DATE ISSUE A 1'OD.MULCH OYER PLANT PTS n'-T a sP-ar 7 K-e'rpmMOTE / a[awror Nora Ni.Owen 3 e•pTs at'Iseiceps Gdr°dies Resaanwrdalarr'inns el pans hslid wit epedfla PLANT SHALES NM ROOT BALL rUNT S. FEROU2ER TAa.ETS AT 1/2 MOT MTH OECDNPOSED ORNATE SUS GRADE SALL DEPTH or Gm 20-10-3 rdwMB,fwIllim wr,wail,and pet amuse MIwNNR1n Ni NWT pled type M N.peeled.Tide gaornlw (mamma Exam awe) I-PER 1 OAL 2-PER 5 GAL / OWNS ON Will. id mmmwe aflw N.OM yeas ll a1 epprard.Any pled^Rands aka are net Deemed by N.City wpm,real^TECasDAe NNW ,..N.,. per Is OeMbw'1 if We milder pee In elriah N.on Tndatd,Well Ni further eueradsd unfit May 20 of no felwag mania y.. ro au •, -raL AM pled mefuel mad Ni n.Hlelrnad le Mai end Apr end Ni elawd le chain navel is aid in an aNd am R n Yee w to we re J / ' asardae afth Na gipped ladwps pan.Ttwaghwl gu wades aul weal eves peach la miry Suet Ni N4pf In a of od aHrasRw warrants.Nam all reYYg,m4ashgP rosioiBP pruning,and Pans mpleawner4 raguhad during Nis petal.Plena Nat has did or hrcelo probed/1 el dybry ehall De LEASE RANCHO Y19T030 mom/nth maim pant el Na ens Waled do and faded dmiladN.a We insect TM µands SITE NEIGHBORHOOD II wad of WO chop fur mamma ponds Mar Men nth deli N e tsplons by Na Owe.Me µcreche ma a n. PARCEL AL Asa eel sew plena Odra As Nam pew nahrlrena smells dOmar,dem O , e eschew a ationa sr DRAWN BY: STAFF PLANTING SECTION - TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY mildew dastnedis 1. CHECKED BY: ()SHRUB N.T.S. CLIENT NUMBER LANDSCAPE GENERAL NOTES: TU 89-2 A.__ 1. E21 EWA'e000 STARES FOR 1. QIsNNw NNW a Widows.adadulo ors appWmala WON RuenlMs teed on mortar d •"�eAyr iS a1S FU Tla¢1,2'oTREES Ir0°0 BRACES r0R 2a'it TWEE ayrimea Wadi an Mr pan SITE NAME PLACE STAKES AT OUTER EDGE OF TREE PIT Ato Z uw1051,PED MOH GAME 2. Ad4NN Wally of Wndoaps mer+d and wdwtnp gear a rat b amok renew old MAINTENANCE FACILITY + • ;,2' '"AN LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE: .b�da in�d or Teareld,ndlmhd.fully dludd raga.Nh ArcNNwf Ow s Ise1WNm of&Ffei;aehrlmo. rrwi 4. MANN RNLI RT IS 2-1/2 TEES THE OWL Or OE CORINNER t 3. lsaeh and pralrl ailing uedaryrwmd rdBll..RapwrdhiNy ter repair at denaye a air SITE ADDRESS • ID 1. ; 1-1 TINES TIE DEPTH OF THE 0SIZE NO. BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME NOTES AaEn room'WNNN,de.I.Wimps r wiring spawn NabN°Non a Included In Nd.centred. o TTIfEs 9555 V.PEBBLE CREEK S. SCAarY NOES AN0 SOaM.Or P,AMTER 0" 4. InlelsN base.ahr18e end yraumdeaams per ngutra+wda d dada sissy m rlalsN sheaf.AN TUCSON,AZ.85737 © u\ ll , s. 0.5 Tc stets 12 GA&to EAl- 'MATURE 2 EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN PALO VERDE grwrndawers end sharba on sayyd Ira.stoNTng rprbamsnle emepl prerlde NOWT sobs ,-1-' CL ReeER LbsiS R'LtNtTm 24'BOX B CERCIDIUN PRAECOX PALO VERDE 101,102.103 7'T_ I-i-i- Lath PER imam won ' fa aMuba making suppeA YmB se►rRel+d STAPLED RUSH TO SORES SHEET TITLE O li I 7. FERTILIZER TAILOR(21 Gar SHRUBS: S. Cristo^s planks ealudi all eoeawal rompArw ri Os nel Instil Feel Iadw pants lei 1 O t20-P1 ZA"IEp I.UrORIONwoTREE star 1M dower of Idling had Ma paled and do nel Will min maim Wiwi ante dew boew ALONG gpOr vale 5 GALLON 20 SALVIA CRC= AUTUMN SAGE 101,ID3 LANDSCAPE PLAN 1l PANT Wi.NNW TAlrm A S GALLON 17 CONVOLVULUS CNEORUM BUSH MORNING GLORY TOT.103 if bwnhg hem 14 wow sun lose pesad. NOTES & DETAILS IALLDET�PINION rD NMITE I. tau.grading a aids errs as hn.aa,d es del ago am,.Na demo by WM gedhg beds. VICINITY MAP gtla 4'-r RANTING.SEwON'ANEMIC SHALL NE WWI 24 Home Priam lbw grading as mired otodng few Ihkimm el mid dip arming Is smplaa flrib S. REPEAT HOSE N WNWousir TO yode.Be nsf nadlfy fain grades Indt°dd mda dull sit I .pan mead In mbar Neim % TIRE STARE H. T RU STARE ON OPPOSITE SDI ISTAPLED P UNTS OO.MIED am CMOEIO OR MITE LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE NOTES: Omaha.ell l.eieope moles en alers t ae innlama r Is lee,.ram b.mewl! NOI EN CONTANEI�6/2e.I NE REJECTED forrrwa sledrors. SEAL O TREE Talmm ADI TTOO INN GRACE1/2.1.1401 new UM. Slnirrl,saga bad sprains ws meal. 102, Doable Olds par dill or guy as nglArd Is wawa upetghl p.dk Upright growl.Is e cendlie of 111.prwanls.lima minds N used m ism as sadad per dsaelan of the Inaalar, 4T4 Nrsa uy(Mm Is shim fad fight Ma bunks era of°eeplif and mad Nibe nomad peter 'L.1Ts'at - le aNeNin ef p.e.Na AMU PLANTING SECTION — TYPICAL Abell & Associates®TREE 103. Spina.dal wryly nth alms Mowry AaswAifee'e r.smamwdd bm spodRslae. N.T.S. Landscape Architects, Ltd. r r'r Amara D0 SHEET NUMBER I sa.r 4PnrA*Ayr-easy NW IIM SW g 0 SCALE: 10' 20' en LANDSCAPE PLAN 1._t0,_o. L— SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS Sec. 13-301 ARTICLE 13-3. SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS Sec. 13-301 Condominiums and Apartment Conversions All condominiums and townhouses and any apartment buildings converted to condominiums shall meet the requirements for construction of multi-family dwelling units under the Group R, Division 3, requirements of the Uniform Building Code and ail other applicable codes. Sec. 13-302 Liquor Uses The Town Council shall hold a public hearing and, for any use for which a liquor license is requested, notice of the hearing on such request shall be mailed to owners grope within 600 Peer of rim proposed use not less than 15 da s before the hearing. The applicant for a license shall submit to the Town Clerk a verifiedlist of the names and addresses of the record owners of such property. A fee, as approved by the Town Council, to cover costs of notification shall accompany the application. Sec. 13-303 Abandoned or funk Vehicles A. All abandoned or junk vehicles undergoing major repairs or being restored shall be stored in an enclosed area by the owner or occupant of the property upon which such vehicle is located in such a manner as to not be visible from any point lying outside the property upon which abandoned or junk vehicle is stored or parked. B. For the purposes of this section: _ 1. Abandoned or junk vehicle means a vehicle or any majorportion thereof which is incapable of movement under its own power and will remain so without major repair or reconstruction. 2. Maior reoair means the removal from any vehicle of a major portion thereof including, but not limited to, the differential, transmission, head, engine block or oil pan. 3. Vehicle means any self-propelled device in, upon, or by which any person or property is or may be transported upon a public highway excepting devices moved by human power or used exclusively upon stationary rails or tracks. Sec 13-304 Flagpoles and Flags Flagpoles shall have a maximum height no greater than 1.25 times the height of the nearest adjacent building. The length of a flag shall be no greater than 1/4th the height of the flagpole. National and state flags are permissible. Flags used for the purpose of advertising or attracting attention to advertising are prohibited in accordance with Sec. 12-603 of this code. Oro valley zoning code Revised 13 - 7 (Rev.8194) AGENDA ORO VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT JULY 25, 2000 Oro Valley Town Hall Council Chambers 11,000 N. La Canada Drive CALL TO ORDER: 3:00 p.m. ROLL CALL MINUTES Approval of minutes from June 27, 2000 Hearing AT THE CALL OF THE CHAIR,THE AGENDA ITEMS MAY BE TAKEN IN ANY ORDER,AS DEEMED APPROPRIATE. EACH PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS AFTERNOON'S AGENDA WILL BE CONDUCTED IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER: STAFF REPORT PETITIONER/APPLICANT PRESENTATION PUBLIC INPUT PETITIONER/APPLICANT RESPONSE AND SUMMATION PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. OV-10-00-10 LEWIS & ROCA LLP LAWYERS, REPRESENTATIVES FOR EVERGREEN DEVCO, REQUEST FOR VARIANCE FROM SECTION 10-004.A.1 OF THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED TO ALLOW A SECOND CURB CUT ON TANGERINE ROAD. SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TANGERINE AND FIRST AVENUE. 2. OV10-00-11 AT&T WIRELESS PCS SERVICES, INC. REQUEST A VARIANCE TO INCREASE THE HEIGHT FOR A FLAG POLE/ANTENNA INSTALLATION IN A PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT ZONE TO A HEIGHT OF 50'. LOCATED AT THE VISTOSO GOLF MAINTENANCE FACILITY, 955 W. PEBBLE CREEK. 3. OV10-00-12 LANTANA CORPORATION REQUEST A VARIANCE TO THE NARANJA RANCH PLAT. FOR THE REQUIRED FRONT & REAR YARD SETBACKS IN ZONE R-4. 11789 N. VIA DE LA VERBENITA, LOT 97 OF NARANJA RANCH I SUBDIVISION. 4. OV10-00-13 ARCOS ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING REQUEST A VARIANCE TO RELOCATE THE EXISTING ENTRY-WAY SIGN ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ORACLE ROAD AND GREENOCK DRIVE. 10195 N. ORACLE ROAD. PLANNING AND ZONING UPDATE ADJOURNMENT A packet of agenda materials, as listed above, is available for public inspection at least 24 hours prior to the BOA meeting in the Town Hall Administration Building, during regular business hours. The Town of Oro Valley complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA). If a disabled person planning to attend this meeting requires any special accommodations, please notify the Town Clerk at 297-2591. NOTICE TO SPEAKERS Members of the public have the right to speak during any posted public hearing; however, those items not listed as a public hearing are for consideration and action by the Board during the course of its business meeting. Members of the public may be allowed to speak on these topics at the discretion of the Chair. If you wish to address the Board on any item(s) on this agenda, please complete a speaker card located on the Agenda table at the back of the room and give it to the Clerk of the Board. Please indicate on the speaker card which item number and topic you wish to speak on. Please step forward to the podium when the Chair announces the item(s) on the agenda, which you are interested in addressing. Posted: LH Date: 07/21/2000 Time: 4:00 MINUTES OF THE ORO VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT JULY 25,2000 ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11,000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE CALL TO ORDER: 3:12 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: James Swan, Chairman Hayward Thresher, Vice Chairman William Adler, Member Lyra Done,Member(Arrived at 4:18 p.m.) ABSENT: Henry Suozzi, Member STAFF PRESENT: Bryant Nodine, Planning and Zoning Administrator Linda Hersha. Administrative Secretary Dan Dudley, Town Attorney Dee Widero, Sr. Zoning Inspector Shirley Gay, Assurances Clerk Melissa Shaw.Planner 11 Bayer Vella, Senior Planner MINUTES A MOTION was made by Member Bill Adler and seconded by Vice Chairman Thresher to approve the minutes of June 27, 2000. Motion carried 3-0. Chairman Swan moved Item #2 forward on the agenda with Item #1 to follow. 2.OV10-00-11 AT&T WIRELESS PCS SERVICES,INC.REQUEST A VARIANCE TO INCREASE THE HEIGHT FOR A FLAG POLE/ANTENNA INSTALLATION IN A PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT ZONE TO A HEIGHT OF 50'. LOCATED AT THE VISTOSO GOLF MAINTENANCE FACILITY,955 WEST PEBBLE CREEK Bryant Nodine,Planning and Zoning Administrator explained that there were a couple of issues surrounding the request for a variance for the height of a flagpole/cell antenna. The issues have been discussed with the Town Attorney. One is whether this will be classified as a major or a minor facility. He explained that if this is classified as a major facility, staff would not be able to handle the request for variance the way it has been presented at this time. The seconded is determining the zoning or parcel on which the 7/25/2000 Minutes,Board of Adjustment 2 facility is located. He stated that for these two reasons staff is recommending that this item be continued until the next meeting. MOTION: Vice Chairman Thresher MOVED to CONTINUE Item Case No. OV10- 00-1 l to the August 22"d meeting. Member Adler SECONDED the motion. AMENDED MOTION: Chairman Swan MOVED to POSTPONE the motion until after the petitioner has spoken. Motion SECONDED by Vice Chairman Thresher. Motion carried 3-0. Chairman Swan swore in the petitioner that was intending to testify. Martha Kuenhold, Tynan Group, Representing AT&T Wireless Services stated the following: • The code as it is currently written is difficult to work around; it is also difficult for the carriers to work through the code if they are not getting a clear direction on which way to proceed. • This request would also include a height and parking variance for a future flagpole. Mr. Nodine reiterated that it had not been determined whether the structure was a major or minor facility,therefore staff could not specifically create a variance. Member Adler explained that because of the lack of information available on the subjects discussed.the Board will be unable to make a decision at this time. MOTION: Vice Chairman Thresher MOVED to CONTINUE Case No. OV I 0-00-1 I to the next meeting of the Board of Adjustment on August 22"d. Member Adler SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 3-0. 1.OVI0-00-10 LEWIS & ROCA LLP LAWYERS,REPRESENTATIVES FOR EVERGREENS DEVCO,REQUEST FOR VARIANCE FORM SECTION 10- 004.A.1 OF THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED TO ALLOW A SECOND CURB CUT ON TANGERINE ROAD. SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TANGERINE AND FIRST AVENUE Dee Widero, Senior Zoning Inspector,reviewed the staff report. She reported that the applicant has requested a variance from the Tangerine Corridor Overlay District section l 0-004.A. Evergreen Development would like two access points along Tangerine Road, approximately 300 feet from one another. The easterly curb cut on Tangerine Road will be limited to right-in/right-out only. Staff findings of fact: • The special circumstances would be the size of the site, and location in conjunction with the arterial intersection of Tangerine Road and First Avenue. • Special circumstances are due to type of development. • Authorizing this variance will improve traffic circulation for the general public as 7/25/2000 Minutes,Board of Adjustment well as retail deliveries. • Variance approval will grant special privileges • Allowing this variance will not be materially detrimental to the surrounding vicinity. • This will be a long-term temporary access, by the year 2015 the road and intersection improvements must be complete. Chairman Swan swore in the petitioner. Keri L. Silvyn,Lewis and Roca Law Firm, representing Evergreen Devco, Inc. Ms. Silvyn explained that the property consists of approximately 11.18 acres, zoned C-2. Evergreen intends to develop the commercial center in two phases. Phase 1 will include the Walgreens store, landscape, frontage improvements, curb cuts and access driveways. The construction of the remainder of Phase 1 and Phase 2 would take place at a later date. Evergreen is currently seeking a Conditional Use Permit(CUP) and has begun to process a Development Plan for the property. Ms. Silvyn explained that because of the Tangerine Overlay District, Evergreen has had extensive conversations with the Town of Oro Valley Public Works Department and Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT)to discuss the number of access points and any restrictions along Tangerine Road. Neither ADOT nor the Town had a problem with the two access points as shown on the Development Plan. In conclusion, she explained that the property is being developed as a cohesive commercial center with five relatively small buildings along the perimeter of the site and one 28.000 square foot office building. The parking and traffic circulation for each structure are not independent of one another. The development shares parking and circulation as one center. In order for traffic to enter and exit safely and for traffic to maneuver within the commercial center safely,two ingress/egress points need to be available along Tangerine. Staff has requested and Evergreen has agreed to a condition to limit the easternmost curb cut on Tangerine to a right-in/right out only turning movement. Chairman Swan swore in the petitioner that was intending to testify. Keri Silvyn and Greg Albert, representatives for Evergreen gave and overview of the site plan. Chairman Swan asked if the widening of Tangerine Road and First Avenue intersection had been discussed. Mr.Nodine explained that the Development Plan was under review in terms of any traffic improvements and off site improvements that would be required. He explained that the right-in/right outs have been discussed and additional lanes are being considered. The only issue that is in question is whether there would be a left turn lane not an acceleration/deceleration lane. 7/25/2000 Minutes,Board of Adjustment 4 Member Adler stated that he was not convinced that the access was necessary for public safety internally or externally. He felt that this would be a detriment and not an asset. Ms. Silvyn explained that as part of the Development Plan process, a traffic engineer was hired to prepare an extensive traffic impact analysis for the property. She stated that the report concludes that the Development Plan presented is a sound traffic engineering plan for both Tangerine Road and First Avenue,particularly for public safety. She proceeded to give an overview of the Development Plans. Mr.Nodine explained that if this were a street without an overlay district, it would meet all engineering standards. He explained that staff was not looking at this as being a permanent access onto Tangerine Road and when the limited access roadway is created, these access points will be re-directed to a frontage road. Members Adler stated that unless the road is dramatically improved the intersection would be very dangerous. Ms. Silvyn explained that Evergreen was working with ADOT and the Town to create a left-hand turn that would not be a hazard to sight visibility. Member Adler asked if it was appropriate to approve and add conditions to the variance before the improvements are complete and sight visibility was insured. Dan Dudley, Town Attorney explained that as long as the applicant and the members of the body do not appeal, anything is permissible. Chairman Swan opened the public hearing. There being no speakers, Chairman Swan closed the public hearing. MOTION: Member Adler MOVED to APPROVE Case No. OV10-00-10 as submitted by the applicant with the following stipulations: the westerly curb cuts applied for will not be opened for use until the improvements of Tangerine Road are completed and has met the condition by ADOT and/or the Town Engineer. Vice Chairman Thresher seconded the motion. ROLL CALL VOTE Member Adler—aye Vice Chairman Thresher—aye Chairman Swan—aye Motion carried, 3-0. 7/25/2000 Minutes,Board of Adjustment c 3. OV10-00-12 LANTANA CORPORATION REQUEST A VARIANCE TO THE NARANJA RANCH PLAT FOR THE REQUIRED FRONT& REAR YARD SETBACKS IN ZONE R-4. 11789 NORTH VIA DE LA VERBENITA,LOT 97 OF NARANJA RANCH I SUBDIVISION Dee Widero, Senior Zoning Inspector reviewed the staff report and gave an overview of the lot using the overhead projector. She reported that the applicant is proposing to reduce the front yard setback from 20 feet to 15 feet and the rear yard setback from 25 feet to 10 feet. Due to the shallowness of this corner lot,the approved model #2218 is the closest fit for this lot and will need a variance approval in order to comply. Staff finding of facts: • The shape of lot creates special circumstances or conditions. • The applicant or owner did not create the circumstance or condition. • The approved model home coincides with the other homes being built for the Lantana Corporation and in the surrounding lots of the subject property, for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights. • The subdivision is in the final phase Member Adler asked if it was possible that the home be re-positioned to avoid the request for variance. Ms. Widero stated that she did not know if this was possible or not. Mr. Nodine added that this was the most shallow home in the subdivision. Chairman Swan expressed his concerns regarding the lot and the extreme setbacks. He stated that he was unsure if any home could be built on the lot. Mr. Nodine concurred and stated that this was a very peculiar lot. He further explained that he believed the area was originally designed to access onto Via de la Verbenita, but the access was shifted off that road to provide a safer access onto the cul-de-sac,therefore leaving the lot to remain the same. Chairman Swan opened the public hearing. There being no speakers. Chairman Swan closed the public hearing. MOTION: Member Adler MOVED to DENY the Case No. OV 10-00-12 application for variance finding that in the absence of the petitioner's testimony, he has no reason to believe that a home could not be designed successfully to fit the lot. It is the builder's responsibility to design such a home to fit adequately on the lot and be in compliance with the ordinance. Motion SECONDED by Chairman Swan. 7/25/2000 Minutes.Board of Adjustment 6 ROLL CALL VOTE Member Adler—aye Member Done—aye Vice Chairman Thresher—nay Chairman Swan—aye Motion carried, 3-1. the request for a variance was denied. Vice Chairman Thresher opposed. Discussion: Vice Chairman Thresher stated that the applicant had the right to build the home. 4. OV10-00-13 ARCOS ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING REQUEST A VARIANCE TO RELOCATE THE EXISTING ENTRY-WAY SIGN ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ORACLE ROAD AND GREENOCK DRIVE. 10195 NORTH ORACLE ROAD Ms. Widero. Senior Zoning Inspector, reviewed the staff report. She reported that the Arcos Architecture representing the El Conquistador Executive Plaza, requests a variance to relocate the entryway sign to the northwest corner of the property, and reduce the setback from the allowed 5 feet to 1 foot 8 inches. The OVZCR Sec. 12-502.B2 requires the sign shall be located at the entrance, Sec. 12-502.B.4 requires the setback to be a minimum of 5 feet from the property line, and Sec. 12-502.B.7 requires only one sign permitted per street frontage. Arcos Architecture is requesting a variance for the following reasons: 1. Lack of visibility limiting referrals and admissions contributing to financial difficulties. 2. Subject property is located below grade from Oracle Road. The existing sign is obstructed from view by vegetation. 3. The site is located on a curve of Oracle Road and the speed limit is 50 mph. This combination creates a hazard to southbound travelers who must locate the site, slow down, and turn safely_ Ms. Widero reported that at the time of the report preparation, staff had received three phone calls with questions and two walk-in visits to review the site plan. Comments have not been in support of this request. The following findings exist: • Because of the topography or below level grade, special conditions do exist. • The owner of applicant did not create the condition. • A variance to increase the height of Clare Bridge sign (next property to the south) was granted in 1999. Chairman Swan swore in the petitioner. 7/25/2000 Minutes.Board of Adjustment 7 Raul Reyes, 5821 East Paseo Busanic,project architect and owner of Arcos Architecture. gave an overview of the site. He explained that moving the sign to the corner of Greenock and Oracle would provide more visibility to better identify the project. He said that this would also benefit the residents in the area by reducing the traffic flow. Chairman Swan asked if the building was fully functioning at the present time. Mr. Reyes explained that this was a brand-new building that had not opened yet, but should be open in about one month. He explained that Arcos proposes to build an identical sign on the new corner with an additional directional arrow located beneath the sign. Chairman Swan asked how many tenants would occupy the building after the completion. Mr. Reyes explained that this was a 20,000 square foot building and the typical tenant capacity in the market place would be about eight professional tenants. Chairman Swan opened the public hearing. Chairman Swan swore in the witnesses that were intending to testify. The following citizens opposed the installation of the new sign and stated that the structure would definitely affect the resident's privacy and increase the traffic flow in the area. • Laurie Stark, 10210 North Valle • Mary Lou Thomas. 10250 North Valle del Oro • • Otto J. Putz, 46 West Oro Place Vice Chairman Thresher asked if the additional arrow that was to be added to the new sign would alleviate the problem. Mr. Putz replied "no." Bart Heins, 6841 North Skyway Drive. He explained that the developer intends to focus on the following issues: • Redirecting the traffic flow in the residential area • Safety • Profit of businesses being brought into the complex. He proceeded to give an overview of the 2 signs to be used on the site using the overhead projector. He explained that if the traffic flow can be directed away from Greenock. it would help the people living behind the property and simultaneously help the businesses and ownership groups of El Conquistador Executive Plaza. Mr. Reyes suggested that the developer install a sign at Greenock and the alleyway entrance to say"entrance to this project" or"no through traffic". 7/25/2000 Minutes.Board of Adjustment 8 Member Adler stated that a reasonable and appropriate alternative would be to install a double faced sign at the location or an angled sign that would cover both directions rather than having 2 signs at two different locations. He said that this compromise would not require a variance. Mr.Nodine explained that the purpose for taking the sign off of Greenock was to alleviate some of the traffic flow in the area. He explained that the visibility of any sign at this location would be weak. Chairman Swan closed the public hearing. Vice Chairman Thresher agreed with the idea of having an angled sign but had concerns with the fact that if the Board denied the variance. the secondary sign would still exist. Member Adler suggested relocating the Greenock sign to the main entrance and make it a part of the double-face sign,therefore. combining the two signs in one location facing both directions. MOTION: Member Adler MOVED to DENY Case No. OV l 0-00-13. finding that an alternative sign construction is possible to achieve both proper identification for the building and to appease the concerns of the neighbors. Vice Chairman Thresher SECONDED the motion. Discussion: Member Adler felt that there were other alternatives for the sign construction that would consolidate these signs into one location and believes that this should be pursued by the applicant and by staff. Vice Chairman Thresher stated that if the request for variance was denied,the applicant has a right to leave the sign in its current location. He did not believe that the secondary sign would resolve the problem. ROLL CALL VOTE Member Adler—aye Member Done - aye Vice Chairman Thresher- aye Chairman Swan—aye Motion carried 4-0. the request for variance was denied. PLANNING AND ZONING UPDATE None 7/25/2000 Minutes,Board of Adjustment 9 ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Member Done MOVED to ADJOURN the meeting at 5:20 p.m. Motion SECONDED by Vice Chairman Thresher. Motion passed 4-0. Respe fully Submitted, inda ersha, Administrative Secretary Widero, Dee From: Vella, Bayer Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2000 1:45 PM To: 'Michael Carroll' Cc: Widero, Dee; Jain, Sangeeta Subject: RE: AT&T Wireless WAPA proposal status Hi Michael, I forwarded your message to Dee Widero...who manages the variance process. If the variances are approved, then Ms. Sangeeta Jain (address above)will be the Planner working on the Development and/or Conditional Use Permit. Till Next, BV Original Message From: Michael Carroll [mailto:mcarroll@pobox.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2000 9:00 PM To: Vella, Bayer Subject: AT&T Wireless WAPA proposal status Hi Bayer, We chatted briefly a couple of weeks ago at the ESLO get-together. I live on Greenspun Place in Sun City Vistoso (by the water station ;-). I spoke with your colleague Dee on the phone after that and she said: --AT&T has withdrawn its Development Review Board proposal temporarily; --AT&T will be going to the Board of Adjustment at the August meeting, to request a variance for a taller pole. I see that Board of Adjustment meetings are at 3 pm. I really can't make that, working where I do. Could you please tell me where I should send a letter, and when, to ensure that the Board of Adjustment has a copy in time for their August meeting? Thanks. Michael Michael Carroll Oro Valley, AZ 85737 1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE ORO VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT In accordance with Sec. 1-708 of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised and Arizona Revised Statutes Sec. 9-462.06, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Oro Valley Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, August 22, 2000, commencing at or after 3:00 p.m. The meeting will be held at the Oro Valley Town Hall, 11000 N. La Caflada Drive and the subject matter will be as further described below: OV10-00-11: CONTINUED FROM JULY 25, 2000 PUBLIC HEARING AT&T WIRELESS PCS SERVICES, INC., REQUEST A VARIANCE TO INCREASE THE HEIGHT FOR A FLAG POLE FROM THE ALLOWED 27.5' TO A 50' HEIGHT. IF FLAGPOLE IS APPROVED A REQUEST FOR A MAJOR COMMUNICATION FACILITY USING THE FLAGPOLE AS A CAMOUFLAGE BY THE STEALTH APPLICATION FOR AN ANNTENNA. SUBJECT PROPERTY: LOCATED AT THE VISTOSO GOLF MAINTENANCE FACILITY, 955 W. PEBBLE CREEK, ORO VALLEY,AZ 85737. As part of the AT&T Wireless Service's (ATTWS) ongoing network and service improvement, engineers at ATTWS have identified the need for a Personal Communications Service facility to serve the Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 11 area. Under current zoning regulations for flagpole installation, the code states that the maximum height can not exceed 1.25 x the height of the adjacent structure. The minimum height necessary for the facility is 50' requested by the engineers. The height of the Maintenance Facility is 22', which would dictate a flagpole not to exceed 27.5'the request is for an additional 22.5' in height. If the flagpole is approved, in order to apply an antenna, this will be considered a Major Communication Facility project and will require a variance to the required setback. The communication tower has a required setback of 1.25 times its total height. The allowed height of the flagpole/antenna being 50', plus 1.25 times equaling 62.5', to meet compliance the Flagpole/Antenna must be setback 62.5' the required setback is currently 20', the approved flagpole is setback 34.1' they are asking to reduce the setback by 28.4'. Site plans are available for review during normal business hours at the Oro Valley Town Hall, Community Development Building. Persons interested may appear in person, by agent or attorney, and the titioners must appear or be represented. Any person seeking further information on this reque for a var'. 'Ce ay contact Dee Widero at 229-4812. AiihA Brya •. odine, AICP Planning and Zoning Administrator \\OV PZD\PZ 1\OV\OV 10\2000\10-00-11\NOTICE#2.doc PosT€D e 100 52. ON/10 -00 -11 vailtia,. 0.401, 4004. �. i1�l►r * ♦ • t, it *tear issue ;:% :k - •`•. t ''' - I �_� ,•,t';0, s � �'►4t •i, . � It ' ,,�� e Irin Subject Property: 1 a `, gi �� �.� , `,,�,�,� ` J__ _.RV NB 11 - Maintenance Facility . ` '�; , G� 955 W. Pebble Creek - "...441P drii:4:41:16":1411.;i. ^mil A t '11-5 1 I et‘1,!\S: i (:".'.•'*•.,illi. 1,,,,,,,,, 11 .•a its":,:.:*-*A OVey e 1 1#In' ri 1 l';#1:\. egt..1? ig. ''is;E:4.1:7.,i.I., 44.,. ,.Semen�eBo Rlope Dr ' ♦ ` Parcels l • i:�' ' 2WooG Through Wy 4IPP - r�. irk ��' ••��,, 3Geesemen Springs Dr 0;100• As No ii wits♦ ♦ y�r a•e I� ��-' 41Noaciburne PI 513moktlale PI ` ,4 . M.IOW,• a. *.l.. • P,ewhed Pi al 111111111100..MI N 1i ,r.•. . �t ar f♦�1r s i�* s Wilk VIM -*---, J i ,0 1/ •'IP 1�• ft el \ ,rA\ ♦,a.0.. W 77 r E 0.5 0 0.5 1 Miles miimmimmi S TOWN OF ORO VALLEY U/0 11000 N. LA CANADA DR. PM ` ORO VALLEY,ARIZONA 85737 AUG-a oo ' Qro44 04 AifG , S`. .o2 40111. 8425C4 KENT MARGARET F 500 GRAPE STREET DENVER CO 80220-0000 1.41-_F1F i l}U 047dd0C?14 1. ' 9 dd Utz/VC/UO FORWARD TIME EXP RTN TO SEND KENT 260 5 EUDORA ST 1.)NVEk CO 80 46-113/ RETURN TO SENDER ?�1�" '��S Y�C1%�':... �iiF it }ft StF{ll.IIiIuE flli f !llfittilfitf l�fF li!lll ilt } 14 Tg TynanGroup Real Estate Development Services August 4, 2000 Mr.Bryant Nodine Ms. Dee Widero Town of Oro Valley 11,000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 RE: OV 10-00-11 AT&T Wireless Proposed Facility Golf Maintenance Yard Dear Mr. Nodine and Ms. Wdero: Please accept the attached as an amendment to the pending application for review by the Board of Adjustment. The original application was continued from the July 25th public hearing due to confusion over the definition of the proposed site as a Major vs. Minor Communication Facility. It has been determined that the site, as designed, falls within the scope of a Major Communication Facility. The first step in obtaining approval for the proposed facility is for the Board of Adjustment to review the application for a variance for the height of the flagpole. A second variance is now required for the facility — a variance for the required setback for a Major Communication Facility. As outlined in Section 9-117 A.1., a communication tower must be setback from the nearest property line, building, and overhead wire, a distance at least equal to 1.25 times it s height. If both the variance for the height of the flagpole and the setback for the "communication tower" are granted, the proposed facility would be reviewed according the regulations for obtaining a Conditional Use Permit. This is a unique situation that does not neatly fall within any existing code definitions. I thank you for your help and continue to appreciate your diligence in finding a resolution to this matter. Please know that it is the intent of AT&T Wireless to work hand in hand with the Town of Oro Valley in the development of their wireless network. Sincerely, Martha Kuenhold Project Manager, Tynangroup Representing AT&T Wireless Services Attachment T'nanGroup.Inc.•3333 East Cannelback Road.Suite 280•Phoenix,Arizona 85018 Office:(602)522-26c Far:(602)522-2660 vtiv« nan6roup.com TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION 11,000 La Canada Drive, Oro Valley, AZ 85735 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION For: Zoning Variance (height) Case No.: Oki — 10 —CU -If NATURE OF REQUEST: On behalf of AT&T Wireless Services, (ATTWS), the Tynan Group respectfully requests approval for a height variance for a flagpole located in front of the Vistoso Golf Maintenance facility. In addition to the height variance, AT&T Wireless Services request approval for a variance for the required setback for a Major Communication Tower. Approval of a height variance for the flagpole and a variance for the setback would allow ATTWS to develop a new wireless facility with the least obtrusive and most aesthetically pleasing installation possible while also providing quality service coverage to the residents of Oro Valley. APPLICANT: AT&T Wireless PCS Services, (ATTWS) represented by Martha Kuenhold Project Manager, Tynan Group PHONE/FAX 906-7323/fax 797-4818 Email: Mkuenhold@tynangroup.com ADDRESS: 1 East Desert Sky Club, Number 2 Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 OWNER: Vistoso Golf Partners, LLC ADDRESS 1121 W. Warner Road, #109 Tempe, Arizona 85254 PARCEL NUMBER: 219 22 001C PROPERTY LOCATION/ADDRESS: 955 W. Pebble Creek LEGAL DESCRIPTION: IRR PTN LYG NLY& NELY 72.41 AC Section 26 11 13 ACREAGE: 72.41 CURRENT ZONING: R4R Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 11, Parcel AL APPLICATION FEE: $200.00 ATTACHMENTS: 13 copies of the following: Photo Simulations, Site Plans, Vicinity Map, County Assessor's Map & Records, FCC Compliance and Adjacent Ownership (300") Date: G 11 2C00 Martha old, Tynan Group, Representing AT&T Wireless S rvicers 1 SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONS FOR APPLICATION FOR VARIANC AT&T Wireless Services!Vistoso Golf Maintenance FlagpoleE Installation 1. Identify difficulties or problems that would result from corn I i present zoning requirements, P Y n9 with the As part of the AT&T Wireless Services's (ATTWS) ongoing network and service improvement, engineers at ATTWS have identified the need for a Personal Communications Services (PCS) facility to serve the Stone Canyon / R anc area. Based on a computerized engineering study considering the local h P o Vistoso density and topography, engineers at ATTWS have issued a "search ring" id pulationentifying he necessary location for a PCS facility in the area. This search ring represents an area in which a facility must be located to allow it to function as an integral unit in in system. PCS facilities are laid out in a grid pattern and the spacing, height and toca PCS of this component site is critical for the successful operation of the overall system. The proposed flagpole antenna installation adjacent to the Vistoso Golf Course Man nane facility meets the engineering criteria. ce The immediate area of the search ring for Stone Canyon is residential and resort / club ) in character and offers no opportunity for collocating on an existing structure. to meet the engineering height requirement, a structure was needed on which the antennas could be mounted. Utility poles and light standards as well as flagpoles have been by the carriers to meet the height requirement. These installations are stealth inused defined as the camouflaging of an antenna array to integrate the antenna nature structure in terms of design, color and material. In this case, the antenna is the contained within the structure of the flagpole fully Under current zoning regulations for flagpole installations, the code states that the maximum height can not exceed 1.25 x the height of the adjacent structure. Vistoso Golf Maintenance facility is estimated to be approximatelyu 22' whicThe dictate a flagpole not to exceed 27.5'. If built according to current zoningre would the flagpole would not provide the required height for the telecommunication facility. ons, AT&T Wireless Services requests that a height variance be granted for the proposed flagpole / antenna installation. The minimum height necessary for the facilit s This height is necessary to have the antennas "clear" the adjacent two sto a a 50'. complex. ►y p rtment If a height variance is granted for the flagpole, the proposed telecommunication facility as defined as a Major Communication Facility will require an additional variance for the required setback. As outlined in Section 9-117 A.1., a communication tower must be setback from the nearest property line, building, and overhead wire a distance equal to 1.25 times the proposed height. The maximum allowed height according to th e underlying zoning is 50' and would require a setback of 62.5'. The site is currently design with a setback of 34.1. 2. Identify and explain all unique and particular circumstances that would prevent you from complying with the present zoning requirements on your property in regard to the following areas (slope, narrowness, shallowness, irregular shape, location, washes, vegetation, and easements, etc.). The location of the flagpole at the front of the Maintenance facility has been selected to be fully integrated in the design and function of the existing facility. As previously stated, the request variance of 50' would allow the antennas to send a clear signal over the adjacent two story apartment complex. 3. Identify and explain any particular conditions in the surrounding area, which would keep you from complying with the present zoning requirements. There are no existing structures with the required height for the collocation of antennas for a new ATTWS facility within the surrounding area. PCS facilities are designed to cover a small geographic area, frequently a two to four mile radius from the site. The proposed site is designed to provide coverage to the immediate area. Residents in and around the site location as well as patrons of the golf course and clubhouse facilities will be direct beneficiaries of the improved communication services. Cellular phones are no longer considered to be a luxury but a necessary service for residents. The use of cellular phones has become an effective tool in emergency situations. 4. Provide the following: Current list of property owners See attached Thirteen Copies of dimensioned preliminary site plan See attached Thirteen Copies of dimensioned floor plan N/A An estimate of the incremental cost of the change in, or additions to, the property, such as estimated cost to be endorsed as accurate by licensed contractor or engineer. The ATTWS construction costs for this site are estimated to be: Equipment Shelter and facade $35,000 Flagpole $20,000 Site Work $40,000 Installation of Antenna $15,000 AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE PROPOSED NEW TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITY Golf Maintenance Yard BACKGROUND INFORMATION According to recent reports, approximately one out of four Americans (more than 85 million people) use wireless phones and that thousands sign up for new service each day. It is the goal of AT&T Wireless Services to work hand in hand with the Town of Oro Valley in the development of their wireless network and continue to provide quality service to the residents. The Town of Oro Valley has recognized the need for communication facilities as a service for it's citizens and has defined guidelines for the appropriate installation of facilities in Article 13-7 Communication Structures and Facilities. There are two definitions for telecommunication facilities found in Section 13-703: a Minor Facility and a Major Facility. A Minor Facility is one that meets the following criteria: shall be constructed using stealth application, and must be located on an existing structure (building or pole), or shall be ground mounted up to a maximum of 20' in height. A Major Facility would encompass all other site designs. A Minor Facility application requires the review and approval by the Development Review Board. Major Communication Facilities require a Conditional Use Permit, which may be granted by the Town Council after a hearing at the Planning and Zoning Commission. If the CUP is granted, the DRB must also approve the application for final approval. The proposed facility at the Golf Maintenance Yard was initially defined as a Minor Facility consisting of a stealth collocation on an existing structure (the flagpole) but has been re-defined as a Major Facility. Additionally, the proposed site design requires both a variance for the height of the flagpole as well as the granting of a variance for the minimum setback requirement for a Major Telecommunication Facility. FINDINGS A. That there are special circumstances or conditions applying to the property including its size, shape,topography, location, or surroundings which do not apply to other properties in the district. AT&T Wireless Services has identified the Town of Oro Valley as a priority for the development of new facilities to increase both the existing coverage and expand the service area. As the demand for communication services increases and more users access the network, additional sites are required to handle the load. The Town of Oro Valley, particularly Rancho Vistoso, is an area of intense growth and the growth is reflected in the increased demand for wireless service. Wireless communications sites must be considered as part of a network, not as a single individual site. Communication facilities can be compared to links in a chain, one link adds to the next making the network design longer. Like a link in a chain, a telecommunication facility has a limited range and must be connected to other links. Topography is a major factor affecting the area covered by a communication facility. Wireless is a low power, line of sight broadcast technology meaning that it will transmit only as far as there is a clear path without obstruction such as hills, bluffs, or buildings. If the area is hilly, as found in the Rancho Vistoso area, the radio waves may be absorbed by the surroundings similar to way a carpet would absorb the sound of a stereo system. The actual area covered by an individual facility is a function of height and power. Because wireless technology operates at a low power, the area covered is usually between one half and ten square miles. The process of identifying the location for a new facility is quite lengthy. It begins with the RF engineers issuing a "ring" or geographic center point for the facility that will connect with the existing sites (or links in the chain.) AT&T Wireless representatives must then identify a specific parcel that is adequate in size and shape and can meet all requirements for the zoning district. A lease agreement must be negotiated with the landlord granting their approval of the initial design as well as authorizing AT&T to proceed with zoning application and approvals. The Town of Oro Valley presents a unique challenge to the acquisition and design process as described above. Opportunity for stealth collocation and applications are limited and required a creative approach to meet both the network requirements for AT&T and character and code restrictions of the Town of Oro Valley. Great care was given to the selection of this location and the site design. B. That special circumstances were not created by the owner or applicant No special circumstances as described in the above response have been created by the owner or applicant. C. That the authorizing of the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights. Everyday in United States more than 100.000 emergency calls reach 911 from wireless phones. These emergency calls include phone calls from cars reporting accidents, drunk drivers, medical emergencies and other roadside hazards. Wireless phones play a critical rose in enhancing emergency services by providing vital communications during times of emergency or disaster. Although no consistent market evidence has been established, the proposed AT&T Wireless facility will not adversely affect the preservation of property values of the adjacent parcels and may in fact, positively impact the value of the home and property. Letters of support have been forwarded demonstrating the ever increasing dependence on cellular phones for daily use as well as emergency situations. D. That any variance granted imposes such conditions as will assure that the authorizing of the adjustment shall not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone. Wireless carriers have a legally mandated responsibility to the FCC to provide wireless services to your Town. There are many wireless carriers building new wireless networks as well as continually expanding their existing networks. Each carrier is assigned a separate frequency, much like a television or radio station that each have their own unique frequency. Wireless carriers have different network designs as well as equipment which impact their coverage and service areas. The granting of a variance for the proposed facility does not constitute a special privilege. E. That authorizing the variance will not be materially detrimental to persons residing in the vicinity, to adjacent property,to the neighborhood or the public welfare in general. Much has recently been written on the health and safety of wireless technology. Wireless technology is low power radio signals transmitted over an assigned set of radio frequencies. It operates by transmitting radio waves through the air. The digital / analog information contained in these transmissions is converted into voice, data, fax, email and other types of electronic information. More than a hundred studies have been conducted over the last forty years and experts have determined that there are no harmful effects associated with low power radio transmissions like those used in wireless communications. AT&T Wireless antenna facilities comply with all applicable federal, state, and local safety guidelines. The Telecommunication Act of 1996 gave the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) authority to establish rules to limit public exposure to radio signals from wireless communication facilities. The proposed AT&T facility will meet or better these established FCC guidelines and rules. OV I 0-m00 1E1 I /(4( _.. A1,7,----/>?,,,- 56,,,.\-_, ,..,..,.. 7) `4;:rk• --.., \,_>40,, ' ----I-Ai\ 1-17(2t) ---1,„ \i/ ,:,----- / 2., --.:(......1,_ i ip ,,,_ i- _.--- _s. ,, \N.r---1... 1 ___\z/ __ (, ______...._,:----„,,, :i :I .,.,* .---- -- It •-- - ...„ - -- L.,;:e.i.-+°:,:.1.›..:- .:_,, ._- • / - ......___... -r ;, ,. Z- �A ♦ � :� Subject Property: :/,.), , '� • � RV NB 11 - Maintenance Facility i �` 11 �. ,---. \si �'��,� +�;., yz 955 W. Pebble Creek \:- - ,.) /}„.../..„--r 7 (-\ \7\ \-------_,..,, '‘,:.e,.,...../(4.6---t---. 7:::-...„ / .1.4104.1._..•, \ / '''''/ / '. . tIfg1/4) \ \ // / --..,..._ /i) / I / 1 \ 4*:""--I -2 #! • .,-.7" il I o• ) $ • ,\ /sue --- Y'Lc. ..,9•�# •` :� C. ik,/ "/,,, .......1 I ir 4 • '\ r ( l'1 r w6' `.1 ,,,-..);_,,," ›-. -,•) . • -0,N OroVaHey / ...------........„. ) \ / vi ______ / / .• " ,1 \\1 „::::::V" 1 Sipneniego Ridge Or iwooe Through wY3 GeesemPa SOPPIP Di A/ Pa rce i s ter. � %r i 4-.. ‘ , \-• 4 ,(1" ^� r��l \ Veloodburne Pi 1. y _ } ` 1;' r sq 4• aeraamreq r : . ", -'''''''.\ \,,,''''''' /1 A-. .-i-t... 1 N _ \ '-fir.i,- •,,, Y \�l Y J \\\ 0w.rneeemwr r 1.0./aeder PI J I / --------. ' .:.-•-• : ) _..-,y.,9 .... , • ,,,< (:.t.A \ 1 \ ...--veeN ::, .. r; A ---,,,,i i W --"Ir;r E 0.5 0 0.5 1 Miles S AT&T WIRELESS SITE : TU 89 MAINTENANCE FACILITY all„ pIL II 111 gllllll I ll l°IiPIIIpVIlI�III°lill Ilillll'I III I '. - .: �� u� I'I II ry P .r. r , IIuu IGT - y , Ala 1 101 PHOTO SIMULATION OF NEW EQUIPMENT SHELTER AND FLAGPOLE Ig TyntliraT Photo simulation prepared by TynanGroup,Inc. :. r .. . AT&T Wireless Services Proposed Facility Vistoso Golf Maintenance AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES Letter of Support VISTOSO COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION c/o Lewis Management Resources, Inc. 180 W. Magee Road, Suite 134 Tucson, AZ 85704-6680 tel. no. (520) 742-5674 fax no. (520) 742-1523 August 1,2000 Chairman and Members Oro Valley Board of Adjustment Town of Oro Valley 11,000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley,AZ 85737 RE Need For Communications Structures and Facilities in the Rancho Vistoso Area Dear Members: Based upon frequent comments and concerns expressed by residents of, and visitors to, the Rancho Vistoso area, the Vistoso Community Association wishes to convey support for additional communications structures and facilities to service our community. All those who depend upon cellular telephone technology on a daily basis frequently experience, also on a daily basis, "dead"areas, cut-off calls, poor reception,etc. Such interruptions in service constitute a hardship, as they disrupt business, keep families out of touch and, potentially,delay responses In emergency situations. To further amplify the seriousness of potential problems, which can be caused by poor cellular transmission, examples of how cellular phones are utilized in daily life in Rancho Vistoso are cited below: Doctors and other professionals depend upon cellular telephones to receive emergency calls and important business communications when it is necessary to be away from the office. Likewise,expectant fathers, relatives and employees of persons with medical problems need to be mobile in their daily lives, yet In a position where they can respond promptly to medical emergencies. As many children are raised in households with two working parents, it is important for the child to be able to reach a parent in an emergency, and just as important for a parent to be able to monitor a child's activity and location. Rancho Vistoso and its environs invite hikers, both young and old,to get out onto the trails and partake of the beauty the area has to offer. Many folks from Sun City frequent the trail system within Rancho Vistoso Itself_ Those who carry cell phones when they hike do so, because they want the comfort of knowing help can be summoned In case they get lost, suffer an injury or some other type of medical problem. Similarly, those who enjoy golf as their primary source of recreation and exercise often feel more comfortable with a cell phone to keep them in touch and provide them with the security of knowing help will be nearby in case of an emergency. i t J2 Letter to Board of Adjustment August 1.2000 Page 2 Cellular phones are widely used by people within the service industry to keep in touch with their personnel, dispatch calls, locate customers. etc. Poor reception, or lack of facilities within a service area,can result in lost time,wasted fuel and delayed service to customers. As cellular technology improves,some residents are opting to reject"hard-wired"phone service for their homes entirely In favor of cellular phone service. For these folks,cell service is the only method for communication with the outside world, so it becomes even more important that the service be reliable. In researching the reason for cellular transmission problems in the Rancho Vistoso area, several providers were contacted. The response was the same from all of them. Rancho Vistoso's location with respect to the Catalina Mountains,the local topography and the Inability to gain line of sight with existing cellular transmission facilities from numerous points in the community all add to frequent disruptions in service and poor quality transmissions. Calls to the Association regarding transmissionlreceptlon problems in cellular service are increasing exponentially. The perception is that, while Rancho Vistoso Is attempting to be on the leading edge of high technology development and services, it is, in actuality, rather "low tech" when it comes to cell service,with some of the poorest service In southern Arizona. it is the Association's hope that Town of Oro Valley officials will be pro-active in making decisions pertinent to new communications facilities and technology to serve Its citizens, so that all who reside in, do business in, or visit the Rancho Vistoso area can be confident that they will be able to"stay in touch" with the outside world. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, 77/23:( "%s.„ Mark Lewis Lewis Management Resources, Inc. for the Vistoso Community Association ML•lf cc: Mayor and Councilmembers,Town of Oro Valley I o AG RA '�' - AT&T WIRELES S SERVICES Infrastructure, Inc. r S. ENGINEERING Gl CBA(SOLUTIONS ty - .- - -. — -----. - -- - 700t rR'St r..,...c ROAD 91TC UO vNOE?RL A1EiCMA 9SS0T3 PNOII(OM)INS—NIS F.(602)KS-3S21 M A I N T E N A \ C E FACILITY CONrDaRANT GS vAND•MR TT([ r0R4�•r r OI EN( I ;,ROUP.IAT Arm Nn,9C OUPLiCAT(D.USED OR DISCLOSED NOp7u MIIHOUI Tk(M•R,Ii(N CONSENT PREPAREDOR T : [A,1;3CFII IF CiE.C1/CONSUL FING TLAI':� I-�I?, 1I.!.� _r,1_u,•II.I '.,, t11 I AT&T FIRELESS 2398 E.CAIELBACK RD STE 1100 `` N. OWNER PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85016 OWNER NSTOSO GOLF PARTNERS, LLC 1121 W. WARNER ROAD /109 111-11 SITE LOCATION: 955 W. PEBBLE CREEK \ TEMPE, AZ. 85354 ORO VALLEY, AZ. 85737 o\ TynanGroup �\ (480) 831-2000 JURISDICTION: ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA \ ZONING: RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY Hnr/Er/rxr llrr,1, ,r,u m SEMI u,s CONTACT: JOHN BEERUNG �� DY C \ _ 3333 E.CMELBACK RD STE 108 LINE OF SIGHT TRIANGLE BUILDING CODES 1 i PFNIX,ARIZUTA 85018 t .t, ,� APPLICANT \ <}�' • / ems. ?` +,...„.4.,, :-� TYNAN GROUP UNIFORM BUILDING CODE : 1994 UBC 1• , o� �' is- 3333 E. CAMELBACK ROAD NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE 1996 EDITION RrTERHAi REDLINE CHECKLIST `" PHOENIX AZ. 85018 UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE : 1994 EDITION •- !�• \N' . PHONE: (602) �`.'�',' �. - ' ,, \\. '_\\ FAX: (60 ) 522�266055 UNIFORM FIRE CODE 1994 EDITION ZONING SATE \C.,/ �/ ! \ CONTACT: MARTHA KUENHOLD / / Qt { E f' / / i." / �3is�4�• ?yO I SITE ACO. DATE g`a i ti�% ' N-, may- . ., PROPOSED EQUIPMENT OCCUPANCY l ,` `'k €P4 ' ARCHITECT/ENGINEERING SERVICES (UNMANNED TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT AND ANTENNA) I CONS1RUCTTON DATE I . 2� / �/ � \ WATER SUPPLY: NONE AGRA SIMONS INC I '� \����• �<' �\ 2001 W CAMELBACK RD. ELECTRICAL: TBO TECH OPS. DATE ( T ��\),v o �o, \. \-\ PHOENIX AZ. 85015 TELEPHONE: US WEST I ;.' s \ PHONE: (602) 995-3916 CAS: NONE R•E• DATE ti o; '\ '-�� \. N. \ FAX: (602) 995-3921 _ ( ya.. „',',. .., ,J `.� �-. CONTACT: MIKE FORSYTH SUBMITTED:�` ���� \ �.� THE PROPOSE�PROJECT INCLUDES I _ - ...�. SURVEYOR REVISIONS 1. INSTALLATION OF AN 11'-5� X 20 EQUIPMENT SHELTER \ DATE I ISSUE / DESERT MANTECH 2. INSTALLATION OF A NEW 3—SECTOR ANTENNA A 7/to/oo LOWING APPROVAL 11 �� ."N / 15020 N. DOGWOOD LANE ON A NEW STEALTH FLAGPOLE. t5 ll)1/r r 7rA...,AE'11 .AE. _ 7 N FOUNTAIN HILLS. AZ. 85268 3. A NEW 400A ELECTRICAL R 1 \ LEASE \ PHONE: (480) 837-7856C CAL SERVICE TO FEED NEW STRUCTURE \ e, FAX: (480) 816-6522 4. A NEW TELCO SERVICE TO NEW EQUIPMENT SHELTER. 1 CONTACT: TOM CRAFT SITE S. INSTALLATION OF NEW CMU WALL SCREEINING IRREGULAR \ BUILDER 6. INSTALLATION OF NATURAL DESERTSCAPE LANDSCAPING \ 1230 SO. FT. N. AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES, PCS SITE LOCATION / AREA DRAWN BY: WAT&T PROJECT OFFICE CHECKED BY: \ \ 2398 E CAMELBACK RD SUITE 1100 LEASE AREA: IRREGULAR2939 1230 SQ. FT (.027 ACRES) CUEHT NUMBER PHOENIX AZ. 85016 SITE ELEVATION: \ PHONE: (602) 224-2688( )602 TU 89-2 FAX: GPS LATITUDE: 33' 27' 0OW\-. EXISTING MAINTENANCE FACILITY CONTACT: BILL CORK 224-2980 GPS LONGITUDE: 110' 58' 48' N AD: 27 RANCHO VISTOSO SITE ►AME _I NEIGHBORHOOD 11 ____ __.__ ____________• ____-__.-_---.__- _ MAINTENANCE FACILITY PARCEL AL .-- -- ---------- _-_------- -- 1.-'4,\4 0 $. \ RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY I IIEEJ_± 2. i /ICNIrMAi SITE ADDRESS I \ SHEET TIME 9555 V.PEBBLE CREEK "ATM TUCS1?I, AZ. 85737 Z-1 ZONING PLAN, PROJECT DATA. VICINITY MAP & SHEET INDEX `ip IDS s+:EEt Tttti �\ Z-2 SITE PLAN �O HIGH Z-3 ENLARGED LEASE PLAN AND ELEVATION LOOKING WEST SHEET INDEX C-1 TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY ,Q�B/' ,n z PROJECT DATA, �f z , VICINITY MAP, L-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN PF,T o �, SITE DETAIL & (THE FOLLOWING DRAWINGS ARE IN CONSTRUCTION PHASE) ■ �— 2 2 ELEVATION L.; o S-1 STRUCTURAL NOTES AND FOUNDATION LOCATION PLAN 0 0 r ' SEAL S-2 STRUCTURAL DETAILS ., o- SITE G vi, -4. E-1 ONE UNE DIAGRAM, ELECTRICAL SPECS. 8 PANEL SCHEDULE, SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS .. E-2 ELECTRICAL SITE AND GROUNDING PLAN TOO R!Nf. RD E-3 ELECTRICAL DETAILS �, E-4 ELECTRICAL DETAILS — ---- - SHEET ?O NlER 1 ZONING PLAN 1 •: : _ s — ,Ilt O AGRA `� Infrastructure, Inc. ^ 1' `\� RESENGINEERING GLOBAL SOLUTIONS 2001 T CiHE1d1.1111 A0E ROAD UO ` \ 1.14011.,AlazoNA awls • s� \, PFAX(�b2) for it �r \ ` Al:DRAWINGS AND WRf TIEN VATE RIAI CO41AINED NERTIN ART THE PROPER,' `\ `\, Of THE ITNAN^.ROUP-ATST AND NAA WIT NORTH BE DUPt TH EN USED OR OISENT D NE DIA i TMEIR WRITTEN C ISCNT. N. `\ ^� \s PREPARED FOR: `�- a\� \•\ AT&T WIRELESS \ .~ 2398 E.CAIELBACX RD STE 1100 `\ /� �', \• PHOENIX,AR1ZENA 85016 1 `\, '' \..... \`\ , .. '`' N 1 1 .� • .\ • TynanGroup 1 ` .fl . - \, Rlnff.Tlnrt 1Ic ell ymrnl.Srnilcc \ \ '� N. '> STj 3333 E.CAIELBACK RD STE 108 1 \-- T' tis\.�p PHOENIX,API ZONA 85018 1 `o*S 1 ;Cr \`\ \`• ` INTERNAL REDLINE CHECKLIST N. 1 `\ `� S�, `\. ZONING DATE f SITE ACO. DATE wlw LINE OF SIGHT TRIANGLE (REF) /1- ------- f� \ O�' \ o% `\ �� n \\ ,\ CONSTRUCT/ON DATE o�lro_ `\\ \,�— EXISTING TRANSFORMER PAD �� PROPOSED NEW STEALTH FLAGPOLE Q\ \ \ `\• TEEN OPS GATE \ 0 \ PROPOSED NEW BURIE'D,POWER CONDUIT\` WE CO DU T \• R.F. DATE PROPOSED NEW BURIED COAX CONDUITS-- — -I ; _'\``` ..PROPOSED NEW BURIED TE2t0 CONDUIT \ \ ,\ \• SURNITTED: 1 -- ` lier ,<�\ N. REVISIONS \ \� 0 DATE ISSUE 1 ` r' 1_ LEASE sss, \ . \ �� 7/10/00 ZONING APPROVAL SITE s A rl�vrE� :T.u,�l,nor rrEVAE 1230 SQ. FT, POE.S \\ N. \ `\ .....,-,- \ SEE ENLARGED LEASE ` 1 SITE ON DWG Z-3 J80 �\ t ---- • ---"PROPOSED NEW AT&TWS \ 11.-5" X 20•-0" X 10•-1" HIGH ` t PCS EQUIPMENT SHELTER \ • N., \ \ Ns, �\ DRAWN 1lT: (� �- • \ ` CHECKED IT: - PROPOSED FACILITY PAVED PARKING �� (2) VEHICLE CAPACITY \ — ADDITIONAL PAVING TO ACCESS CLIENT NUMBER 1 PROPOSED LEASE AREA �� \ �'°*, N.• TU 89-2 N. \ \ \ \' ` SITE NAPE • MAINTENANCE FACILITY \'\N. \ \ \ s \ \ SITE ADDRESS J '`t N,,,' No• ,,,, 9555 W.PEBBLE CREEK \ \ \• TUCSON,AZ. 85737 \ N.• SHEET mu \ \ \ . ,\,„...\\�� SITE PLAN • • \ \ • • SMUT NUTAER 8 SITE PLAN l.LI >!I Z— 2 _ . ,.. 3,,. Vie! • \ /` - EXISTING TPANSFORMER PAD •AGRA \ . '� ,� / / Infrastructure, Inc.i ,/ / / ENGINEERING GLCRAI.SOLUTIONS �. " ^ / • ?1` 200T'EST W[lAAM ROM 1u+E 470 u �(/ / C' PHOENIX.ARuau w$ • 7 / ,/'c ill DRAWINGS AND RIRITTEN NATERTAI NORTH / /' cii) / -i:- CCNIAIN(p HEREIN ARE TN(RROP(RTT �� . / \ _ O< ME ITN1N GROUP.ATAT AND NA.N0, - AirmOUI THEIR WRITTEN CONSENT / '`.,7/ N' RE DUPLICATED.USED OR pXIOSED PROPOSED NEW STEALTH FLAGPOLE --- ---- -- •/. '- CO' 120' & 240' ANTENNA AZIMUTH .`\ --T.h/ . .kc }1/( �-0�, - -- _- / / �/ PREPARED FOR: I / -1----f— •- EXISTING TREE PROPOSED NEW STEALTH FLAGPOLE o- �, I1. AT&T WIRELESS PROPOSED NEW BURIED POWER CONDUIT - (0', 127 & 240' ANTENNA AZIMUTH) ,/o/ / i *� !� _ 1 �• PFOEN2398 E.CAR ZONA 85d1 RD 6 STE 1100 COLOR MATCHED TO SURROUNDING FACILITY ti'' „ 1 '. \�1 ` 7 PROPOSED NEW BURIED COAX CONDUITS I II II '�, / o �� — ------- - -I, / //--I -----{— .PROPOSED NEW BURIED TELCO CONDUIT b PROPOSED NEW CMU SCREENING---- ----____ / / '--, / /�� Ifji \ \` / // ,..,:\ �.. ,..../..,, //i AC •uNtrS (TYP) ' :i' T nal�Grou EXISTING TREE f -7/,...-----=---- -�� �-� / / / �. \ y / j �� //// / Real Fcr„rT•Il,•rrhpotent.G•n•�1 es -� '�T!/I \\ / / i- 3333 E.CAMEIBACK RD STE 108 PROPOSED NE'M ATdETWS f / // / PHOENIX,ARIZONIA 85018 11'-5" X 20'-0" X 10'-1" HIGH �= • / !j O/' PCS EQUIPMENT SHELTER �, \ / / bj '1� COLOR MATCHED TO , // /i MTERt1Al REDLINE CHECKLIST SURROUNDING FACILITY. CO / /, • LEASE �' ZONING DATE i I I / - ' )(< I' .4' L SITE `/ /' SITE AGO. DATE I `O T /� • !/,�- - PROPOSED NE'N ATdcTW1 ( I f 1230 S0. Ff. / ,i �J il'-S' X 20'-0' X 10'-1' HIGH CONSTRUCT)ON DATE o -- // r I. I I I PCS EQUIPMENT SHELTER L --SHELTER ENTRANCE- TECtI OR§. DAZE _� 7 + 1•�-_--_- 1__ -- _ i �'- /-------- ----EXISTING CMU WALL R.F. DATE �_ _----- '% --- PROPOSED NEW 12' WIDE GATE _-- TO MATCH EXISTING GATE PROPOSED NEW 12' WIDE GATE---- / SusHITTED: PROPOSED FACILITY TECHNICIAN PARKING / REVISIONS SCALE: p 5' 10' PAVED AREA FOR (2) VEHICLES / [—SECTIONAL ELEVATION A/Z-3 - - - 2 a�TE issuE 3/t6"=I'-o" , Q A /Io/oo zornNc Art'RovAl - --- -- - �-ADDITIONAL PAVING FOR ACCESS -�\ 13 +I if Z�UI'�r-I A�(C.^UAL • 11 \ ' / % DRAWN BY: 4 I �` CHECKED BYT I /� /�- CLIENT NUMBER TU 89-2 • - PROPOSED NEW STEALTH FLAGPOLE ENLARGED LEASE AREA PLAN - SCALE: ° _ .... __° 1 SITE """E (0', 120' & 240' ANTENNA AZIMUTH) 3/16"=1'-0" MAINTENANCE FACIUTti r COLOR MATCHED TO SURROUNDING FACILITY O i SITE ADDRESS 1 b 9555 V.PEBBLE CREEK TUCST?I,AZ.85737 -- PROPOSED NEW CMU SCREENING TO MATCH EXISTING WALL TTT — EXISTING CMU WALL PROPOSED NEW AT&TWS 11'-5. X 20'-0• X 10'-i' HIGH ENLARGED LEASE PLA PCS EQUIPMENT SHELTER AND SECTIONAL COLOR MATCHED TO ELEVATIONS t SURROUNDING FACILITY. I LI ILIII 1 1 IT1 -Ij l .T l f ' } ifiUffli I1ThTLi �CrlI1.l L1=Iz� _ r r T I I I Z-1-rZrl r IT -1 1 W it-,-la _I 1 ► IT: ,I I Ti r r-'�rT o_ 1 l 1 Z T L - • 1'•i j,l I , 1- 2'-rhITL� I T ' -11 1' - '! --II. 1 ► II .1 __, I 'Hi!. 1I 1,1-111 III- 111- ... it: 1., COAT CHASE I SHEET NU1(fER SECTIONAL ELEVATION B/Z-3 -S`ALf — Z — ,3 Vino t 1::::Oe5-r-t Line Table Man-tech rS020 N Dogwood L . Po Holt% 4Z 9S2S9 LINE BEARING 01S1ANCE j' 9� Lr SJ+45oo1v l022 r•,•pr.on• 490-93'-'95h L2 S24'44'29 E 58, 17' �41 � Cr} \ \ L3 N65'J5'34 E 26.82 p�;' I L4 N24'24'261V 10.00' L5 N65 JS'J4 E 18.00 a a ® • Ir \ \ L6 NJO57'29 L� 23.91' ;s,o SITE b .....cs.r.o•.,,,c...Tc., t. CON,...,.LKC.Mt(M-•Ooctry Of, -- ou.uCATc0.uSCO de O.SC1,C'S10.'nMOV1 Ilt L7 N590?'J11V 10.00' \ cO.r[c c.. otiscw,or ocscnr...cc. L8 N30'57'29 E 10.00' \ -�- . 1 ('7o .\ , L9 S59.02'31 E 10.00' / \ , �. \ L 10 S30'57'29'W 5.00' '��' `� % o a .. LI 1 559'02"3 t E 22.00' _-_ \ L 12 530'57'291V 32.00' / ' L 13 565 19'24 1V 27.98' ,�� ;. \� Vicinity Map \ �� L 14 N24'24'261Y 9.98' / �1\ AT&T Lease Site Legal Description R.66000' \ / \ .,� .9 ATtri•lrele-•Ser.fce• °.OO'S3'S6" „ O r \ A FCYP,/r}y Or I1E ACl7T7E sr CYlIR%ER Or 7C7XW 24 FCMr6 TP t t 27�8 Gd C trnelD.rt Roed ( 1071' \ C \ I \' �y \ .52.177{,RA IJ CAST Or ITC GTA'4W SA(l RrAf7 6451 NV 4 4N., Phloenix.te AZ 85018 ` CC \ / e ^!' ' �!" - ' GW MINTY,ARazr u7wsCESCRTECOs'r AS EIXLC75 ti� �p�•'`` Ens Al ThE MOST SOf/11MESTREr..3RNE7 Of N57050 RESORT GYTAS . i.' AS RECORDED N 900P 49 Cr YIPS NC A.A1S,PACE 5.RECLNLS Cl Pau \ R=MOO' 11 !� A �► /Ctl111.5 fawn:A ONA SAKI ROO Qr50 Orr of worthFAS'LRt r LAE Or PE3HF °=5YT9 27/--^�\ �''� � \�lj ( •B8T6' ! •Aif,,._ ,�- �O �.. A RADIUS OF IIO.QD FFEr A CROW Nf.4CH REARS.Ma41H 26 QrLREfS IT . tJ". CRffN.pID 7fE1Cf MX111 MESTERLr ALAAO A L7AM 1n THE RA7R HAY1.G 1A ry �Ir, �6• l :..�v J, t ,. RV IJ8 LAYETTES Jr sE NE$1 A O57A6CE Cr Jn 1HIL�CGN A LEHTRII MP II.S MCLE Or CO DECREES 25 Awn 09 sram0S AAC AN AFC LITC14 Cr • _y� / 1.22 FEET;114E.CE DEPM71h0 SAC FCRT1£4SIERE r LIVE SOUTH 54 CY1REES \ ,, NI \ �°, ` ; L s ti Ell 4M/1ES no SECCNOS KIT A DISTANCE 0r 4O Co Mr m A 9P4SS 1 ` L5 /; �`� )LW I r.l CAP 4W?A1AC of K rtAirwT LAK Cl SAC PEEI�E CRUX R1I0.71e'1 L MOPIH 36 DECREES C17 4IN1/105 W SECL tS NES7 ALONG SAC,fK14C7 EY7irli \/ � \ 1 TOP 145 IN A OrS1AACE Of 254.00 FEET 1O A BRASS CAP;17EACE ON A CUM Tc \ ems\ \ , / m 11,E(ITT 1LI.aA;'A RAlM/S Or SA7O7 fEET,1749 t/A CL7Y7774t.N7/2,E x / f r MP!0 6 19 CECREFS 15 YIM/TES 0 SFLA5C5 ARC AN ARC(E5C N Cr 167 99 V a e S. 1E CORNER AE VI /EE7 m A POINT;11EVCE MOR1N ss taEr,REES 00 L+NL/RS ao SECLtiOS T nanGrou l • ' \ ..--- ..),-_______/ SEC 16,TI J$R!Sf NEST,A D674.C7 Or 335.00 FEET 10 A PC�M,114arr SOUTH J4 OELREES Real frrarc 11r rin nrnr Sena r. j 1 I O"\ ` \ L3 ,,,..13. ._ AC174sc ram OR SET 45 AWES 00 SECoNos NEST•A a6TAACE Or I0.00 FEET 0 A FK3NT CN r o „ PrE SOUTIN SIERE r L91 Or PEBBLE CREEK ROAD NC THE TALE POM Or \ \ G ..... �' ,�''a. / 589'!7 I w{� ArEm Of IRE CfJ�RAIJAE Cl A 1000 FL17r WOE ACY•EXS/UfUT1' n�00�u,+i.zorN 850u 7JJ.)E Uuctio fc 49 STE 74:, 'N. \ ltl°J99 p moo'LCWTIAf SOUTH 34 Df1:PEFS 43 IRIW rs AO SELtiwCS NEST,A CeSTAACf Cl 1022 FEET TO A PONT,' 4 N \ / `;t' /NEMT ON A CUM'TO THE LITT 4NII.0 A RAMS or 8500 FEET T1WO C7l �J` A C2N RIL'4W,E LY 59(1541rES 29 IAMB 29 straws MD AN ARC / 1110711 OF 8826 FEET ro A PCWT. ,J4 -tr� THENCE SOL771 24 0957EES 44 YTKAES T9 SEETMO5 EA57,A OCA CE Or ? 5.17 1757 10 A POT: ----- III. �!�, DElA4 AO:TV SCALE 111E CE MORIN 63 DECREES J5 49A.7ES J/SE:04,005 EAST.A DISCAACE Cr SUBMITTED: J1114 13,2070 // \ \ 1 M 48T FEET RJ THE r Of 0 7/NC 7XAV 14 SW ACCESS/I/X 7T GlSE4FV REVISIONS NO 7.'f 1RLE POM/Or BEG7M7rC Cr A EASE SITE _ \ - • \ TONEVI MOM 21 11 JNM/IES 26 SECONDS NFST,A 565;4401 pr DATE ISSUE (HEM MORIN 65 DECREES 15 4NU1ES 34 55504DS AST,,A DLS7AACE Or l ri u l�'c C�'hl.N:i A T'('f OVA L 18.00,£FT 70 A POINT; • \ IFEH E M7RTH JO DECREES 57 4AYJIES 29 SECONDS EAST,A DeS%DACE a F 1(1q/c 7 CU,ui-7 AIT(i,4,, \ N 1 • OO (2, 1J� NORTH S9 99CR ES 02 46NRFS 31 SECONDS NEST,A AS'MCE Or ` Cll 10.A0FFE77 AFYAM' O TILFACE Ag71)4 JO LEGREES 57 wires 29 SECONDS FIST,A D51AACr OF c�fl 10.00FEET10AFI',YNT, 71#NCE SOUTH 59 DECREES 02 WITS J7 S 154405 EAST•A CKTANC'E Cr O lrnl� 70.D0 FEET m A POSE R �. ' IMrMCE Spl1H JO DECREES 57 YM/97 19 915547S NEST A DIS;AM E Or SOO FEET TO A POM,' °- 16'0'00' 17* SOUTH 59 0.rCRff5 AT L61.fgES Jr SECAICS EAST.A D6rAACF A \ ' L- 181.044E0' M. 1 11.07 FEI7 tD A POH1 CN 1TE hC 1741!51F7tr rACE Cr A£44515IPr AWL •v C7 Caawr+ P T.V.C. E nf?2r SOON Jo DEGREES sl 4NUJES 29 sELTxcs NEST ALarc sAo NJ.A 0m7N,Cr or\\ a , wnE cav794AE 4 Aso NUL.1_So 65 DEGRE 70 NJ NCLE PONT ES 79utr,vr'14 11011. c�EC�Eo a \ I Z D SEL0�CS NEST,A DISTANCE Or 2798 FEET m A POINT 1 CUENT NUMBER' [ 1WArA 515451 IC SW[ALL,50r/1N 24 DORM 24 44V7ES 26 \ 2-00.0S NEST,A DISTANCE Cl 9.98 FEET 10 119E 1771.E FC9IT Cr Lessor's Legal Description r a;;�; - accxmoc TU 89-2 \ R CPPO HMSO AE1 7PFgYb 11,TRACT AL.SEE SPECI4L L - 16799' O ' D AT AACXE FCIr1 Cl CLINITIRI OF DoC:'987 WARRANTY DE.TD RECCRCIO N DCri2T 10271,PALES 1908-1920. ' ' \ - l.4 -o PONT Or BELy6IC AFC KAT Or IE6ONTE4 AS IV P40411 1hE SITE NAME AKIUStiE [ 1 L7avT4nAx/s SPEiXID mot T1kOLG7C1/1 a R•460.07" \\�� Cam''` °. r9 r5'A7• MAINTENANCE FACILITY $1 Benchmark L . r54.5s' \4,\ CPS COVT1ia R7NT CW 90971ERr S(lE Or Pr3B E CR ES \ R010 4P>'RacN1I/Qr 123 FEU AC1Rn1KS FAEr Or AOaTrneESE7 tv [SITE ADDRESS [ \ EHT9AACE'TO CCU COURSE WN7EWA0E EAcxr,F \ Date of survey 955■ PESRE CREEr 70 EEEYAIKW 293934 .W4K188 \ '� \ ,AAIE Ir,1070 oRo vKtrv,4>IIOrN Basis of Bearing \ �t� Assessor's Parcel Number \ \ \ 219-72-OTC Pout COUNTY (SHEET TITLE [ \ 119c 4OACM547ED Cf1TE7ulE Or RU3811 5eEEx ROO.. \ 0 \ $� 91SL77e D AS Sldsew HERETI7/AS REARI.<N36'L17''X \ �� \ �► Site Data TOPOGRAPHIC \ ,p ii EE[171T1aN 1939 SURVEY Legend • O \-ts), i.- UTrTL(Lr J277Y78' o BRASS CAS F1:5+4 /,` 4j P LLM4G'7.VE 117S848' F7P� OR TH \ \ %U 2. y SEAL .VrE14 r h 7. •+ T2E'*ArC 9<,l \ S. 1 Y �y1�t 3 �� C "m msrcsseT Graphic Scale \ ; l � 3 • MI Nr,4rEter+BISN ) e or's Notes Nowa 7.1 • Surveyor's z: 'd .., 1! C.15,E1fr;,7NTR 4ETR •_, • $� z ,2163 � �/ -•-7 WET LNE AK l� 1 s t.k 1gETLREtiCf 5 4ACLr m A Crwlr4Kv1 rap 7LE,r9Rtnc7. kcif,,, :1.N�e!,• L p cbt,NH(L STI773 1' O4IXR K�9 r1957 WINCED CO1961JJ.6 477 97 19151 ArEA Gov 711E/4'5t.RAM7 CCtic4N1 MO rN W4G AN ETTTC.INR / No 1f 711E ofF I inch = 30 n �� ( R-�� NTT Cr We 76,7070 5 EFT N',M. P °-OTTS CS' Nf LESSOR'S tram Drc.cwrrot A'C AECORO EICA•84R'44f 4b I -J 22 9C1N ICR AETEAp77 796' 1Hr5 5 CCYT AL47 C 1 1 0,047 ,r,61)'J,e COw^1L7 A 9v.*gylc^PANT r1(U5'ICW1 PRrrrh M O. J 2J' d [,F'.F A! UP,'Ir.4 r1•. 1 • 6 ..._,, .-.,._......_.. _ . KEYED NOTES: #? LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS: •AGRA �,ICI�Ji1�_ �11+ I' Infrastructure, Inc. T• FURNISH MINI4Uu 3 l"MINUS PINKENGINEERING GLOBAL SOWSIONS / DECOMPOSED GRANITE TO THE (Y'ENr S<aoe sf work Include on'awe.,matelots. ♦I worm pupm^.all we-ewes n•rnury la install to^d+c npl^q ns Inds.tam 2007+16T tiYdyAp[ep„Ap LR 4 3 0 INDICATED. PRIOR TO PLACING. THE AREA SHALL BE TOTALLY EPEE OF wEEOS a.4i•pecll'ed Work,,.lodes.S.A 4 not limited Ia.grade w•paroller•sm.prepa.al�en,p.enl motv'el nandhnq PHONE(AIb2dA awns �� DECOMPOSED GRANITE SHALL BE EVENLY DISTRIBUTED AT THE DESIGNATED one•^s/ollalion,prol,clb^and•poly al all PHONE( )~S"�Is ��. ),)Or) ....rims Imp.e.Mvnss an Me pn�•N prep•rly,and ma;nloin�nq end ►A%(Moil RA}yjt AREAS f0 A DEPTH Of 2 INCHES AND 1 INCH OECP AT PUNT %TS. DO NOT PILE •�`••'nq of all inslnH•d plants�p le final xcrpfance end through'h,quaranl+e and meinlend^ce D•r ads _ \ `� )jj G)j)( -• 111 DPAWINGS AND MR.ITCN YIIE RIAL l UP AGAINST TRUNKS AND STEMS.APPLY PRE-E4ERGENCE CONTROL ACCORDING, GRADING, CCNIANEO Hum.AR[ rNE Paoctus OF THE ,NAN GROUP.4141 ANO uAr Net Ct1 TO MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS AFTER INSTALLING DECOMPOSED GRAMIC Rcvgn grpdin byolMn.f;n:M d Owen condition se no eefer ponds•n BC DUPLICATED.USED CR DISCLOSED r- .5,-, J .X3 , 9 ?�'^R(2 ,luf or minus)to a smooth and A'ItN01/T TM(IR wR1I I[N CONSENT. •r''/G'-, (J \ -- --------- _ —_-_._ parrinq eras not intended nor v+•.eler nlenr:nn "(e V '"5 I LANDSCAPE TO BE WATERED BY HAND BY - 2. EXTENT or DECOMPOSED GRANITE PREPARED FOR: �'�\'f:-' Z L OWNER UNTIL ESTABLISHED AND ABLE TO NePrpY SOIL- W • �f (Z ,, - SUSTAIN ITSELF ON REGULAR ANNUAL AT&T WIRELESS Q? vy - RAINFALL. Coot rUt,Ire•of weeds of►•r•'n+de grass,•d 1f ca n C1 O , ^ I+LArI Ml;[RIA 2398 E.CM LBACK RD STE 1100 1_ CD <, wN branched and DroDorllon••!,fnl class nampin or rho',normal swedes Furnish only troll established PHOENIX,AR1ZQ'1A 85(116 itoi SITE `� r} .,�= -- r ---- _\ conbww,:d flock,with plan)height,•Idle and caliper;n accordance•111 the A,io,o.Nursery A+social;on / - \V C` ifi r\ � \�� G,ed.11n.f Standards for o gl'•^pion'and container size.All new Ines Ior be nursery tagged f )1 1 ( , -�', \, __ \ LINE or SIGHT TRIANGLE(REF) Lu ` - N.hagen floNillred with iron od6 tee.'G•en•od<'or equal,apply in plonk, ,owl mie,at to dr•1fhn per TANGERINE,,?n O Standard PlantingSection g p g O� TynanGroup O/ •, �, FERTILIZER: r • !/ /011111 _ O `� AAA Aqr/arras'plant tabs or equal.site guaranteed chemical anelHi,of 20-10-Os IN-P-R) Apply In plant pith per R.•U!f+I,ITo Ill C!„lrmrnl.�'n Yr reel / j '� Slrlerd Planun Section. 3333 E.CAIELBACK RD STE 108 Itt / „IF '. `°"O40 n PFNIx,ARIZTNA 85018 (o,,ro-• T �' ---Cn$1M4 iRANy,]R.r19 Pep �\(:� CRl'SNED GRANITE ,i 1 O .qA Pink rotor,minimum 3/4•Mews.2•deep wile..with no plastic und•rloymenl-Apply pre-emergent weed / , v /�►.-\\ ��\ mod, \ !UJ control M two oppltcoNons(one prior to plocem•nl of rock groundcorer,one alter placement).here.,rock groundcor•r INTERNAL REDLINE CHECKLIST1 Vi sd f used. I1 I 1 �_- 4F I \ OO /�Ql��..ntx'• �,(-\ \ft''' K / ,\ PPE-EMfRGCNr WEED CONTROL: _ /� ( .,A� ZONING1 1 I V►AO s� ` ,\ -lbcfhol'a equal,apply in accordance with manufacturer's r•comm•ndalions.Treatment Is given fo oil areasDAT[O ( \ -,r cowed eiM rack groundcoser lroid grading,Yoking a sim'lar surface disruption otter spray is applied. $jTEAGO. DATEl `� —_ .. ' � ( Cant:rrl MarlcopoCountyAgrkuNuralEclensicnSorvke(255-1156)fors,o+analtlmNablefor apDllcolion./ \ . \-\ 1_ L CONSTRUCTION CVArot DAZE O /• � \\ / `• W�S('APE EXECUTION:l / In1haR plantmalerlalInaccordancee11h locally retognir•d nursery pro0Hc,f.Toile.guid.Rnef osperI///��� O O ss�� / TECH doseDATE t. LIECOMPOSCD GRANITE D.G.)2• � / / \� Slareord Planting Section.theCa+Nxfinq 011ker reserves M•right to rNscl items d•IlndIn Me londscop•• O �V / / woArhkh an not Mcompliance wltAMe Conbacl Dxumenhoran oMerwitefudgedto b•d•liclenf.this a � O DEP1X OVER NON-P�ENT .-�• AREAS OR TURF IS INWCTED __ON PUNS �, �- 1-ri=i=1- � T_�==,I=nw•i-,•=i, \ krksc4splantr•placemonl(:IB.as•someplanttypeandsite)alno additionalcosttothe ro eelR.F. QAjEF� _ \ P I-."" __S!r .Ten a:� I. PREPARE$DLL AS SPECYIfD BY vO r O iF © CROwER / - • ` , s+nrt■[wm.NCC / \ GUARANTEE AND MAtNTEII NCE: w811mED.. \� \ 90 Tay quaranlee and malnlorgnc•for otl pluni moleriol a•c•pl all trees to car one ear - 3. DEPTH AND WROTH,TWKC ry y g•ioranl•e. Qp= �= CONTUNER DU4CTER s - ill k+iltollon el Ill guarani••awed moinlenance periods shall not commence until deliclenl a non complylnq - REVISIONS ROOT BALL t. 1•D.G.MULCH OVER PUNT PITS I ' �_ / P■aeOSEM"Kw Arens _ _--- -__ ---- \\� , Ir-s-s la-7.no-I•vs. Hems of work hove Dean corrected,and the following written information Is submitted to and approsd by # DATE I5S(3E PLANT SHRUBS WITH ROOT BALL RUSH 5. BALLFERT 2ER TABLETSGM Al 110 ROD( _- - nos CDL10w[Mt 9(LRR Ill O.rw 3 copies of'Londsc ape Contractor's Reeammendati000 Iblinq all plants Installed.Ill specifk wITN DECOMPOSED CRAN(TC SUB GRADE Bill DEPTH 21 GM.20-10-s - _- -- - , _ - (AD,LCENi EARTH GRADE) 1-PER 1 GAL.2-PER S GAL _ -/ /-_-_ wafering,IMlgraflon,pruning,and post control Inlarmallon for each tool In the ro Kt.This A 7/IO/r'rf / -vas rs•c'J41■Au D which D i qIN.City i,..11 [ACIIAesiAc- Nre CM YR(CNbr*Ail sham commence alter the City?tees final approval.My plant materiah which an not opprosed by the City F 71t11[sr' Al•,A,Illly/`irlls+V/k r11 Pw•Pn.1D r,cA,n rt^f•.r,•N PARC.., („,„..---7)// poory Ocknor 1 of the comma.ywr In which That ore Installed,shalt be further guaronle•d until Mny 20 1 : of Ill lolbwinq calendar year. 1 n.rrara we�r'r,rpl:err - AR pioM mal•rlah must M rnoir.lolnd in henlfh and.Igor and be ollowd to attain natural sir'and lhap•in accordance with Ill approved landscape plan.Throughoul guarantee and moinl•nance period Ill landxope ,.era Pew,..;AM Acc[ri us[. sham M kepi in o neat and of•racllw a\`` 1 D Dpearoneo.Perlwm all roklnq,moil,?,rnlaking,pruning,and plant LEAST rrpbcem•nl required during this period.Plants Mal hwe died or indicate probability of dying fhoR be 1 RANCHO VISTOSO ,placed with another plant of Ill fame installed sire and botanical chas0F,cauon as I.original.The guarantee T \ SiTE NEIGHBORHOOD II period of 90 days for r•plac.sa nt plants shun begin with dale of acceptance by Me Owner.The guarani•• HRUB PLANTING SECTION — TYPICAL _ uwan 1 L AL RESIDENTIALEHIGH DENSITY shoR not cower plonk which di.from poor moinhnonc•prxlke Owner,adverse weather conditions DRAWN BY: STAFF — - 'hal art corer pla CHECKED BY: N.T.S. /7.-.--- cum NUMBER i LANDSCAPE GENERAL NOTES: TU 89-2 14."..4, t. sv i•.2•le•woo0$�AI:Es joR , GALLBI TREES 2 2 II w000 I. Ouonllfl•s Wad on lordscape,ch.dule on opproslmol..Verify quan1Nleo Listed with numb•'of STAKES FOR 24 90X TREES. PUCE STAKES AT OUTER EDGE specimens Indicated on IS,.plan. SiTE NAME _1 A Its Of TREE PIT 2. LANDSCAPED FINISH GRADE 3. 2. Adjust Ideation of landscape'notarial and watering,stem as required IR avoid ulINie,and MAINTENANCE FACILITY Y Ru TSALL 1 2 HIGHER TFLIN '- obstacles not Indicated or Incorrectly Indkald.Verify adjusld Iacono,with Architect prior �w '�rt` ADJACENT Ws.' MADE 1. MINIMUM PUNT MT n 2-I I TIMES /i LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE: I.1n,fallaRon of dfecid,palm.,, 0 THE Q1AY,p THE CONTAINER S // 1-1/2 TW($THE DEPTH NE THE (11 SIZE NO. BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME NOTES 3. Locate and peeled oshMng underpound utilities.Refponslb101y for ropok of damage to under SiTE ADDRESS J CONTAINER 1\ o 4 S. SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF %� TREES: ground utilities due b landstope co wafering system lnslollollon It Included In This contract. 1- 1• PUNTER PIT / 9555 V.PEBBLE CREEK O UCSI?1, AZ.85737 �1III•-- 6. ((2))TIE mitBER S Gl! e MUlii- - 1. fntlall Irur,shrubs and reundcwren per requlnmenh of detolh shown on detail 1Me1.Atl T;j • PLT RUBBER tq2 e•LE TN —MATURE 2 EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN Ba•i:I:.Ii I hw n:ns: ' n-n„ . PILO v(ROEd.WIR[S0111111 _ -- -" - --2a- BOX 6 9*ou^drown and rhrubs aro'sent from stoking requirements ercpl preside nunery slokn �'�- • •a=n.= n•I, unw,iaiw, MRI.v[R IOCITI CERCIOIUM PRAECOX PALO vERDE 101, 102, tOS Ior shrubs r 31 a STAPLED FLUSH 10 STAKES •1.1.1 support unfit cslabiiand. 0 ; 1. FERTtU2f TAKCIS(21 GRAM SHEET iTTLE * 0 V0-20-5 3 l H GALLON TREE SHRUBS' S. Coordinate plonling lthedAl•ellh twsonol requirements.Do not IntIoN frost teller lI PCR 1•Eli HAU RAy pl0nlf until a 0.w,.,. WN ALONG 1 BALL - S GALLON 20 SALVIA GREGGII AUTUMN SAGE 101, 103 aHor Me danger.R killing frost nos pa.td and do not i ololl sun fensiuw pionh until danger LANDSCAPE PLAN () B PUNT SOIL MIXTURE TAMPED B 5 GALLON 17 CONVOIVULUS CHEORUM BUSH MORNING GLORY 101, 103 of burning from the summer sun"at passed. NOTES & DETAILS OW OF„A�1.� WATER SETTLED POOR TO TREE PUNTING WO Art1R TREE VICINITY MAP MS■r a'-�' SHALLIy(WTVIO WATERRIG 6. Rough radio M rite orwt as Ird!eal•d on whit the pion to too lane by she grading Mode SHALL 8(wniHlN,^l HOURS 9 grading Perform fine gredN+q of required allowing ter thickness of rack fop dressing no complete finish TREE STARE IIWIR REPEAT NOSE AND ING TO geode.Do not madly finials grades Indk old en Me cirR site plan nc•p1 in manor Instance, s1pS[ TREE STAKE ON OPPOSITE SIIH $1ih "°T` LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE NOTES: PLANTS OCUVf R(D WITH CRACKED OR 7 Demolish all erhlln londscop•"notarial on slle unless indicated to remain nr In be','.aged )) BROKEN CON!AFNERS WILL BE REJECTED 9 i� r ROOIBALL IO BE I/2•Nln,;ll(R THAN IOI la re-us•,Is••h•re SEX tR([ RUNT ADIACI VI IARrN GRRAM Standard,sngke trunk specimens vs required 102 Double flak• guy or required la ensure u hI rowlh.Upright re.M h a sandal. - -� per deioU or prig Bg 01 Ill guoran1•e.Remo.0 support.X wed as soon at...hoot par discretion of the Installer A•e.; Mun•ry(t•misorary).tote If.1 no to tree Irynks on rot xceDla Dl•and mutt too remared prior i al quonnl f .tin.. (DTREE ` toWhoa.Whoa. ee. , I PL AN TINGe SEC>•ION - T YPI�`A - - - ,� ,, � • 103. Specimen.sHe eornply eiM lrir°,Nunory►srecbfbn•s recornmord•d tree grief',Oa". N.T.S. ^^' SHEET NUMBER r( 0 1,e__ o e_ VOL-51D0(4_. r � S l FAI 11(.1-(' J S a 12-ed-r:oro* VA 4vvoce *UfL i4E t&4 ,Df2,8 i a 5,2'14 qj.--<_c Tg TynanGroup Real Estate Development Services August 7, 2000 TO: Dee Widero , I FR: Martha Kuenhold L� RE: Variance Applications for the proposed AT&T Wireless Facilities at Quiet Rain/Rancho Vistoso (WAPA) and the Golf Maintenance Yard First, I want to thank you for your special consideration and help with the pending applications for variances. It just gets more complicated each day! Would you please review the accessory building setback for both the Wapa ground equipment and the ground equipment location for the flagpole installation at the Maintenance Yard. Over the weekend I prepared CUP applications for both of the proposed facilities to be reviewed as Major Communication Facilities. As I understand the process today and if they are approved by the Board of Adjustment on August 22nd, Planning and Zoning will review the applications on September 5th. A review by the DRB follows on September 12th with a final review by Council on October 18th. Whew! I really will need desk space and covered parking at the Town offices for the next two months! I have attached the narratives I prepared for the CUP applications for your review. I thought they might be helpful in preparing the staff report for the variances. I am still working on the "Findings" which I am "finding" hard to justify. I will try to have them to you tomorrow. Please do not hesitate to give me a call if you have any questions or suggestions on how better to present the applications. Again, my sincere thanks. TynanGroup,Inc.•3333 East Camelback Road,Suite 280-Phoenix,Arizona 85018•Office:(602)522-2655•Fax:(602)522-2660•www.tynangroup.com DIST +DINED TO: ❑ MAYOR 13 TOWN MANAGER Margaret A. DeBacco ❑ FILE ❑ COUNCIL 655 W. Vistoso Highlands Dr. # 11-132 Tucson,AZ 85737-5892 ice' DEFT HEADS Ea'OTHA Lo r_= August 15, 2000 Oro Valley Board of Adjustment RE: Case No OV 10-00-11 Oro Valley Town Hall Council Chambers 11,000 N. La Canada Drive Tucson,AZ 85737 To Whom It May Concern: I am in opposition to the request by AT&T Wireless PCS Services, Inc. for a variance to increase the height for a flag pole/antenna installation in a Planned Area Development (PAD) zone to a height of 50'.The subject property location is The Vistoso Golf Maintenance Facility, 955 W. Pebble Creek, Oro Valley,AZ 85737. The Vistoso Golf Maintenance Facility is a single story building that is nestled into the golf course. 1. This flagpole would be an eyesore jutting up 125% higher than the Maintenance Facility. 2. This request is asking to double the maximum height allowed. This is not a request for one or two feet, but 28 feet! 3. If the American Flag was kept raised 24 hours a day, illumination would be required, it would take away the beauty of our nighttime desert sky. 4. It would take away the natural look of the Tortolita Mountain Range. A manmade pole sticking out of the mountains would mar sunsets. 5. There are many other locations that would be more suitable. 6. Why not place the antenna on an existing flagpole? Many residents of our community are away for the summer and are not aware of this variance request. I received my notice today. I would like to speak to the board on this matter. Please consider postponing any decision on this matter until the fall. Sincerely, '271,„„/„.„)6 6.60,e,d-a Margaret A. DeBacco Tocson Resort ACCOMMODATIONS A RFsO T(Lyisr- COMPANY August 22, 2000 Chairman and Members Oro Valley Board of Adjustment Town of Oro Valley 11,000 N. La Canada Dr. Oro Valley, AZ 85737 RE: Communications Structures Needed in the Rancho Vistoso area. Dear Members: Based on frequent comments and concerns expressed by residents and visitors at Vistoso Resort Casitas, Tucson Resort Accommodations wishes to convey our support for additional communications structures in the Rancho Vistoso area. We have receive many complains from guests at Vistoso Resort Casitas about cell phone problems in the area around our resort. Most of our guest are here for golf vacations and also have cell phone problems when they are playing The Golf Course at Vistoso. I feel very strongly you need to address a solution to this on-going communication problem we have in Rancho Vistoso. Thank you for considering this request. Sincerely, hi ,, , erald Ashland General Manager 655-w.Mato-to Highland:Drivc • Tucson,Arizona 85737 �.'.+ovcsor►reaon.com 520.797 4496 • 520-797.7159 fix 1.888.730.3300 o n u ,�"'r�r /f- 2 l , �,� � '-- (7-47 - ;•?/7 /-7/-/ -- ,i--7y1-�7/;/a-y,,--v ,.� d'/✓vk.� tkg- f;: l fi',� «C L im7-2- • -----w.277 2,'Z7(.• 7777 j f -Q-7n -7,0(A ( l/7 ;r 2(r.) r -,---;.�--> 7-` ,r-�i/�'' 1�) L-9/ ,�'"d'7 =�--r ,�y� ./ .Ys7 fi. 7).<)/j� ,-..,-,?,..-7- ,_,..----,>-.4-,,,,-›-,e-w-ilz,e- I/---2,r, .-7-7,/-2 /-,,,„7- -i--;--ii-7.7 -."7-72 _77 (,.4--,7 444)(2-;,:, „r-n,-0 --.-,40 ::.x 47,' 4?). r-?"2-z? 7-. ---, :74.--k,2-2,v,:‘,2:.0 . :,,:( . , . , ,, i, . fp- 72:: ��%J?ll-1,-v- „w e:,7` y `pr7C 9.1:X 7:7C l` 7(Jr�/,? -/,,)?C i 7 -..-' '77 1 .j-:mil 7 ,r pf ?-+71_%� • -7'l�q�� iJ ��/-y;?:!'9/jT2 �, ,,--r 7-T'7 l7�1 r� i. / �.>%6?..� 4--ii } /O-l;2 ,,, / ''d' _ �'1,9/ -/)J e- :- '�-17v-2t 7 '7/2 % '' 2 KV-!U/l ' 7 f , i . 9-91-P-4.4 . ./a.)-,-.072 ,,,./..&? ••/' _,,,-/A , ,_ ..-},, I ...,0 .7 ...2.„ey.,,,,2.7 . , • .-- / -)-,vr�-� ,a-7-a---.p /1 :�7 � ' / `may,",�7 �% p-f2L,C7 777 / ,:; '7" - 7� /gyp ./7-(1,- �J� v /,f ?-''7>i -27 /� '?1102✓ �)7) 7,- '2-'.7y- �'`.4,!7„,e-,P7/--‹ -7"--x,;/2 r.a--xpe,--,7772 ,l-,-.17,1-'0011? -,-,,,,--v.(47-4,/(., V L,' . (2 -v7/ 7'7 ,7-- y -2:2 -Y�� rl�j'.//1-1?dr.:, ,->'-•' r lip"-''J 7(7? g (47a41:-‘; ‘122 -77, ,_,,„,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,-- -;??77 777/12 /- � L/ ,---w,,,,..,9P.R /-?-7,2 i-22e. ' z• G n f .-a', ,7-7/ ( 77-S;'--/"' PAR-vvi - /_ V 77-- /2 Gl ep�7,2 .2(ia ,2 �i'dJ` k01-0 `7, lY it �jj,„,-7) //" t �f • ( b V �/ • im „_0-ry- i t yi J c) ,z{,r) fiz . i ,E/ (, (I ( r T A r J Oi.7000'.�C T G J 9CS�RT. r I ii_mac_ ;6-7vc4 //�ct/y7c GJ_e Q l__.Q&e.,—, ? (4t.eJ 7 ) .ez,�. crv._e ,4 r,e /f�a J f- Cam» 4—_ ale '/ 0,40/.4,7,--)oz, ,,,/ g a,..,4 , ,,=-,-,' ,--7 _,A,_,,e,„ v , 6:- -740,-C>-2-G ! i/7G1/ Cc% Ge/6-e:_ 2� Oo l_ ,_-4l.L-""cre--- 6.-</L_1 c �� _.Q 'cam i D c 7z6-e...6.9-6-4---. ::'_-_,a_-7, z./..,,e,,,--ee„76/-",, Irti-g:I',----1-/?-el.:4-e-e- ...__47_,,y (--/ -,,,,,e_e_ek.- . 6,,C_-. -77_,-a,t, ' L_"--i-e•>: (1"/1L-7"4--, ----/K-M -1"/c &7 ,-- ..'\:///i& 0-e./",(3/_4 : // C _,- ,'7/ /ie!.../-Ze-----.1 Z.,,i., �/ L .Ci1 L GEe:�. ll GIi:e,:eiv4 .>1 Ge c.,_ 6,ls, ,a-Z)7 G%4 nc n oC / -,e--'L ,7 7 GC f e-Z-4-,-447-07,--e i-C..l.. ,.r4Y6,'.�.i - (.14 z'-_,1 zw_.2o-L,Ar -,,e--e- ae.,76/6_2;c_,;. , Az;les � '�:.-7 C.--C.<-9 e-/-.!�/ Win- �/$, c/G-ezi= ;1-e7-/P1-76e ;-__P" -K---774,"6-Z-:: ---de-2,.. :-61--e--- -4466----e-‘ C.-,./("Lf ,(2_, t Icz./,/.176f.ef_9_6<_,11 7 /7 6W e-- GD �/ -1 c`-e-c--, • /lG--7` 0%C .%L!-G,"...._ 6?)- ---- e-eZe-e-- ---/''6,e."---47)---‘-e_e__-,72 7,7-L.,,e ,f4.7., ..._Q2--e-6--,90-7, _.-, r,,,,,,ra,„„ 0, ,..„, piy.4v-44.,- / 6(2.i"-ee_/1 da.,/cz „/Z-e-e7/A1-4i-/ cz,e_e_e,-- c. -7‘ 77o--, 0 r7.)4.07fre,(..,,L/ae_z_ ita-4. cx , ce.,-,7/42-/ "%/c--./- aec4:4 iel _A .-- -.� ..._.,-mil('0- -cu_,, _.- cz 4i(3 6,e__e6 4 Uc"i #C?2,/i7 e..,44:-. A at)0,e each/Al 1%; 6i(elv(ogichV ,/_34/,c4,r_ 31 3- f-9`1.3`- ° ' /I4F Qui(///'e iq /(s 6 i 6, .Ar7 4Asd .5.r- 6c2 Chi.5[C3so F{(8 ti 44x--ts 6141, 1 0 0rut �Za F t A E MINUTES OF THE ORO VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AUGUST 22,2000 ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11,000 N. LA CARADA DRIVE CALL TO ORDER: 3:00 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: James Swan, Chairman Hayward Thresher, Vice Chairman William Adler, Member Henry Suozzi, Member ABSENT: Lyra Done, Member STAFF PRESENT: Shirley Gay, Assurance Clerk Dan Dudley, Town Attorney Dee Widero, Sr. Zoning Inspector Debbie Moran, Zoning Tech Bayer Vella, Senior Planner MINUTES A MOTION was made by Member Bill Adler and seconded by Vice Chairman Thresher to approve the minutes of July 27, 2000 with the corrections noted. Motion carried 4-0. Motion carried, 4-0. Chairman Swan moved Item 3 forward to be followed by Item 1. 3. OV10-00-14 WITHDRAWN AT&T WIRELESS PCS SERVICES, INC. REQUESTS A HEIGHT AND PARKING SPACE VARIANCE LOCATED AT HONEYBEE RIDGE Dee Widero, Senior Zoning Inspector explained that a report had not been prepared because the item had been withdrawn prior to the report being written. She explained that staff has received a letter from the applicant withdrawing their request for a variance and read the following: August 21, 2000 Mr. Bryant Nodine Ms. Dee Widero Ms. Sangeeta Jain Town of OroValley 08/22/00 Minute,Board of Adjustment 2 Community Development Department 11,000 North La Canada Drive Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 RE: OV 10-00-14 Variance AT&T Wireless OV 08-00-06 CUP AT&T Wireless Dear Mr.Nodine, Ms. Widero and Ms. Jain: With regret,the Tyangroup on behalf of AT&T Wireless Service respectfully withdraws both the application for a variance and the application for a Conditional Use Permit for the proposed wireless facility to be located at Honey Bee Ridge. Please accept this letter as a formal request to initiate a zoning code amendment at the next Planning and Zoning Commission meeting scheduled in September. In addition to the proposed site at Honey Bee Ridge, two future sites identified by AT&T Wireless within the Town of Oro Valley may also fall within open space. AT&T Wireless is anxious to do all that is required to move forward with these proposed facilities. I am hoping to schedule a meeting for Thursday,August 24`"with Town representatives and the Real Estate Manager for AT&T Wireless. Please do not hesitate to give me a call if you need any additional information or documentation. I look forward to finding a mutually beneficial resolution to this matter and appreciate your continued interest and support. Sincerely, Martha Kuenhold Tynangroup Project Manager, Representing AT&T Wireless Services Cc: Beth Daison, AT&T Wireless Service Jeff Weir, Town of Oro Valley Scott Stiteler, Stellar Homes Mark Lewis, LMR Chairman Swan opened the public hearing. Chairman Swan swore in the witness that was intending to testify. Martha Kuenhold, 1 East Desert Sky Club#2 stated that given the site's complexities, a code amendment would be required before moving forward with the request for a variance,therefore were withdrawing their request. Chairman Swan closed the public hearing. ' r 08/22/00 Minute,Board of Adjustment 3 MOTION: Member Suozzi moved to ACKNOWLEDGE and WITHDRAW Item 3, AT&T Wireless PCS Services, Inc.,request for a height and parking space variance located at Honeybee Ridge from the agenda. Motion SECONDED by Vice Chair Thresher. Motion carried, 4-0. 1. OV10-00-11a AT&T WIRELESS PCS SERVICES,INC. REQUEST A VARIANCE TO INCREASE THE HEIGHT FOR A FLAGPOLE INSTALLATION IN A PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT ZONE TO A HEIGHT OF 50'. LOCATED AT THE VISTOSO GOLF MAINTENANCE FACILITY, 955 WEST PEBBLE CREEK Dee Widero, Senior Zoning Inspector, reviewed the staff report. She explained that AT&T Wireless Services has identified a need for a Personal Communications Service facility to service the Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 11 area. Under the current zoning regulations for flagpole installation(Sec 13-304),the code states that the maximum height can not exceed 1.25 x the height of the adjacent structure. She explained that the purpose of this code requirement is to ensure that flagpoles are compatible in scale with adjacent buildings. She said that according to AT&T engineers,the minimum height necessary for the facility is 50 feet. The height of the maintenance facility is 22 feet, which would dictate a flagpole not to exceed 27.5 feet. The request is for an additional 22.5 feet in height. Ms. Widero stated that staff has received several letters opposing the request for a flagpole from citizens living in the community and one letter in support of the variance. She explained that the applicant is proposing to install a flagpole at the Golf Maintenance Facility in Neighborhood 11 and that Rancho Vistoso Partners has given their approval. Staff finding of facts: • The Golf Maintenance Facility is not greater that 22 feet in height. The zoning code allows a maximum height of 27.5 feet for the proposed flagpole, AT&T is asking for an additional 22.5 feet above the maximum allowed and 28 feet above the adjacent building. • The flagpole location is approximately 400 feet to the nearest residence. • The site location requested for variance, sits 10 feet below grade of Vistoso Highlands Drive • If this variance request is approved,the applicant will then move forward on to agenda Item#2 OV 10-00-11 b, to reduce the setback for a Major Communication Facility for an antenna application to the approved flagpole. Ms. Widero,reviewed the supplemental report for Case No. OV 10-00-11 a& OV 10-00- 11b. She explained that the Planning staff has utilized the Rancho Vistoso (RV)Planned Area Development(PAD) and the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised(OVZCR). The proposed Major Communication Facility will be located in the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development (RVPAD) Recreation Area/Golf Course land use designation. Since there are no guidelines specified in the RVPAD for the Recreation area/Golf Course designation,the staff utilized (as interpreted by Bryant Nodine, Planning and Zoning 08/22/00 Minute,Board of Adjustment 4 Administrator)RV PAD's Resort district for design guidance, as it is intended to provide for recreation and golf uses. She explained that under the permitted uses section in the Resort District,the RV PAD refers to the permitted uses in the R-4R Resort district of the OVZCR, Sec 7-203. A Major Communication facility is allowed with a conditional use permit(CUP) in the R-4R district. The height restriction for a Major Communication Facility is 50 feet in R-4R zoning district. Vice Chair Thresher expressed concerns with the project being categorized as a "flagpole." He said that he considered the pole to be a cellular telephone antenna and would prefer that it be referred to as such. Chairman Swan swore in Bayer Vella, Senior Planner. Bayer Vella, Senior Planner explained that the usage proposed is for a flagpole, but is also a communications facility which is addressed in two separate sections of the Town Code and with the Town Attorney's consent, staff has taken a conservative approach. He explained that the applicant would need to address all sections of the code that pertains to the application. He stated that there was no question that the purpose for the flagpole would be to create a communications facility. Chairman Swan asked who recommended making it i.e. a flagpole rather than a communications pole. Mr. Vella replied "the petitioners, for the purpose of establishing a communications facility." Member Suozzi inquired as to why the antenna would meet the code and the flagpole would not. Mr. Vella explained that in order for the antenna to meet the Major Communication Facility Code Requirements, it has to be stealth. Meaning, it has to appear to be something it isn't to blend in. He explained that the applicant has proposed using a flagpole to store the communications device because the code has been oriented to hiding this type of facility. Member Suozzi asked if the height would be a problem if the project were classified as an antenna. Mr. Vella explained that if the project were classified as an antenna, the height would become an issue,however since the project has been identified as a flagpole there are specific code references that restrict the height of a flagpole. Chairman Swan stated that if the variance were rejected, it would be rejected for two reasons, (1) height and (2) unable to meet the stealth requirement. 08/22/00 Minute,Board of Adjustment 5 Mr. Vella explained that the issue that has been brought before the Board is strictly the height of the flagpole and that there were definitely other options that had not been explored. Chairman Swan asked if the pole would be less obtrusive and noticeable with or without a flag as it relates to the general conception of what people will see as they drive by. Mr.Vella replied "because it is higher than your average flagpole it would probably be less noticeable without the flag." Mr. Suozzi explained that the report states that this type of facility only services a geographical area of a 2 to 4 mile radius in order to be effective. He asked if this would set the precedent for more flagpoles or poles in the area if the variance were approved. Mr. Vella explained that cases are reviewed on a case-by-case basis. He said there had not been any focus toward reviewing the accumulative impacts of the placing of poles in close proximity. He said, "staff is planning to review and revise the code regarding accumulative impacts. And in terms of the visual and aesthetic impacts, it is certainly an issue that is under the purview of the Development Review Board, who reviews both Minor and Major Communications Facilities." Member Adler explained that it was his understanding of 1 l a, that the Board review the application for the flagpole not a communications facility and determine whether the flagpole by its own definition warrants a variance. He stated that he would like to hear the petitioner's justification for a variance. Chairman Swan swore in the witness that was intending to testify. Martha Kuendhold, 1 East Desert Sky Club#2 stated that this was a complicated situation and gave the following overview and reasons for the choices made regarding the site plan. • Originally,when the site was designed, it was understood that it would be reviewed as a Minor Facility. The definition of a Minor Facility would be one in which the antenna is co-located or attached to an existing structure • The flagpole is the structure to which AT&T was to attach the communications device placing it under the Stealth Communication Minor facility. This definition was challenged and the facility was redefined as a Major Communications facility, which would require rezoning or permitting it twice. First,permitting it as a Minor Communications Facility and second permitting it as a Major Communications Facility to meet both criteria. She explained that it gets very complicated to separate the two. AT&T has worked hard and long to find a suitable place to co-locate the antennas and integrate them into the surrounding area • Initially AT&T had considered co-locating the antenna, but the Resort Golf Casita's was not a willing landlord because of the requirements of ground space AT&T Wireless needed for the equipment • AT&T has received a letter of support from the adjacent property 08/22/00 Minute,Board of Adjustment 6 She said that it had been a difficult task to find a functional site for AT&T Wireless and meet the zoning requirements. Chairman Swan asked if the 50-feet height was the minimum height needed for the facility. Ms. Kuendhold replied"drop dead minimum." Member Adler stated that it seemed contradictory that an operator would be supportive of having improved service but unwilling to participate in the accomplishment. He explained that he understood the point about taking the flagpole matter in 11 a as a part of the communications requirement,however,the Board is being precluded from doing so because of the way the report had been presented. He said that the flagpole is being presented as needing a variance for a height increase because it is in violation of the portion of the Code that deals with flagpoles,therefore, it is not being presented as a Minor Communications Facility. Ms. Kuenhold stated, "it is our belief that the flagpole installation is suitable to the Golf Maintenance Facility and its surroundings. That would be my defense of having a flagpole at that particular location. It does blend in and compliments the facility. If AT&T is not successful today, the proposal could not move forward under the guide of a Major Facility and Conditional Use Permit." Chairman Swan asked if it was her understanding that the reason for the variance for the flagpole would be to meet the stealth requirement of the Code. Ms. Kuenhold replied"truthfully, I had not thought of it that way because my thinking is much more defined as minor or major. Member Suozzi asked what were the dimensions of the flag. Ms. Kuenhold replied"unfortunately I do not have the dimensions but it would be a rather large flag." Chairman Swan inquired if a variance would be necessary for stealth purposes if the request was for an antenna with the 50-foot height. Mr. Vella replied "yes." Member Suozzi expressed concerns regarding the height of the pole from a safety standpoint. Mr. Vella explained that prior to the construction the applicant has to submit structural engineering plans that would be reviewed by staff to ensure that it met all Uniform Building Codes. 08/22/00 Minute,Board of Adjustment 7 Chairman Swan opened the public hearing. Dick Maes, 945 West Vistoso Highland Drive, representing Rancho Vistoso Partners, Stone Canyon and President of Rancho Vistoso Homeowners Associations was very much in favor of the installation of the communications facility. Member Adler stated that he wanted to be sure that this matter had been researched and investigated thoroughly to find other options or alternatives for a 50-foot flagpole, and that all citizens in the area were contacted. He said, "the Board should be aware of the options whether they exist or not." Ms. Kuenhold stated that she had been in communication with The Resort Castias and if the variance were approved she would be moving forward with the Development Review Board and various other boards to provide an opportunity for their participation at a greater level. Chairman Swan closed the public hearing. Member Adler stated that he would not substitute common sense of what 11 a represents to him. He stated that he appreciated Ms. Kuenhold and Mr. Maes recommendation of moving the tower to the second location that it seemed sensible. But in his view,that was not what had been presented before the Board. Therefore,he stated he would limit his vote to the 50-foot height consideration and not to the extraneous considerations to what had been presented in 11 a. Vice Chairman Thresher expressed concerns with the combination reference of the project as a"flagpole/antenna tower" and felt the Board would be out of its jurisdiction if it were to approve the request. Member Suozzi expressed concern regarding the height and the accumulation of poles erected in the area. He added that he had not heard much discussion regarding alternatives or options. Chairman Swan asked if the applicant was requesting a variance for a flagpole because they could not meet the stealth qualifications under the normal antenna structure. Mr. Vella replied "that is correct."He explained that staff recognized the lack of these types of facilities in the Town. He reported that staff is visited frequently by communications facility providers weekly and that staff has definitely taken a conservative approach in terms of how to establish a precedent for development. Mr. Suozzi stated that it would make more sense to add to the existing poles in the area to avoid having so many different poles. Chairman Swan stated that the hardship that the petitioner was experiencing was a result of the Town Code Stealth requirements; isolating the antenna as such is impossible 08/22/00 Minute,Board of Adjustment 8 because of the auxiliary needed for the equipment to function properly,therefore the applicant request for a flagpole was reasonable. MOTION: Member Adler moved to DENY OV 10-00-11 a, finding that the variance request does not meet the criteria and that there are alternative ways that the antenna can be mounted so that a flagpole may not be necessary. Motion SECONDED by Vice Chair Thresher. Discussion: Member Suozzi agreed with Member Adler and said there may be a better alternative and agreed with the motion. Vice Chair Thresher call for the question. ROLL CALL VOTE Member Adler—aye Member Suozzi—aye Vice Chairman Thresher—aye Chairman Swan—nay Motion carried, 3-1, Chairman Swan opposed. 2. OV10-00-11b AT&T WIRELESS PCS SERVICES,INC. REQUEST A VARIANCE TO A MAJOR COMMUNICATION FACILITY TO REDUCE THE SEDTBACK FOR A FLAGPOLE/ANTENNA TOW FROM 62.5 FEET TO 34.1 FEET. LOCATED AT THE VISTOSO GOLF MAINTENANCE FACILITY, 955 WEST PEBBLE CREEK DRIVE, ORO VALLEY ARIZONA 85737 Martha Kuenhold, representing AT&T requested to withdraw Item 2 from the agenda. She added that she appreciated the Board's time and obvious attention to this matter. PLANNING AND ZONING UPDATE Dee Widero, Senior Zoning Inspector had no report. Dan Dudley, Town Attorney suggested having an executive session/study session at or before the next meeting to review the legal aspects relating to certain issues that will come before the Board. Discussion: Member Adler expressed concern regarding the notice of hearing to the property owners within the 300 feet radius. He asked that the Planning and Zoning Commission be asked to insert a review of the public notification limits or boundaries in their work plan. i 08/22/00 Minute,Board of Adjustment 9 Member Suozzi suggested that the letter of notification be made more personable. He felt that this would get the attention of the reader. Member Adler expressed concern regarding variances that did not fit the plot plan. He suggested that there be a requirement that when the developer is submitting elevations to the Development Review Board (DRB)that at least one of these elevations is certified and fit on the plan. Member Adler expressed concerns with"staff finding of facts"and asked if it was necessary to include this section in the staff report. He suggested that this be reviewed at the executive session/study session. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Member Adler moved to adjourn the meeting at 4:45 p.m. Motion seconded by Vice Chairman Thresher. Motion carried, 4-0. Respectfully submitted, i a Hersha, Secretary II ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT REPORT CASE NO: OV10-00-11a Hearing Date: August 22,2000 Agenda Item No.: 1,Continued from July 25 meeting. Prepared By: Dee Widero, Senior Zoning Inspector REQUEST: AT&T Wireless PCS Services, Inc., request a variance to increase the height for a flag pole installation from the allowed 27.5 to a 50' height. Subject property location, The Vistoso Golf Maintenance Facility, 955 W. Pebble Creek, Oro Valley, AZ 85737. REQUEST SPECIFICS: As part of the AT&T Wireless Service's (ATTWS) on going network and service improvement, engineers at ATTWS have identified the need for a Personal Communications Service facility to serve the Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 11 area. Under current zoning regulations for flagpole installation (sec.13-304), the code states that the maximum height can not exceed 1.25 x the height of the adjacent structure. The purpose of this code requirement is to ensure that flagpoles are compatible in scale with adjacent buildings. According to AT&T engineers the minimum height necessary for the facility is 50'. The height of the Maintenance Facility is 22', which would dictate a flagpole not to exceed 27.5'. The request is for an additional 22.5' in height. SITE LOCATION: To reach the requested location,drive from either direction on Rancho Vistoso Boulevard around to Vistoso Highlands Drive,turn west,the first street to the south (left) is Hidden Springs Drive turn left. The first street to the west is Pebble Creek follow until you arrive at the Maintenance facility(955 W. Pebble Creek). Take your detailed map for the on-site review. NOTIFICATION: All property owners within 300 feet of this property have been notified of this hearing. The property has been posted with a Notice of Hearing and the Hearing Notice has been advertised in the Daily Territorial newspaper. At the time of report preparation, staff had one letter from Eugene Nielsen in opposition to this request (letter included with report). At the time of last months public hearing we had received one letter from Lanna Conrad, also one from Carol & David Bueker in opposition. Dick Maes with Vistoso Partners has supplied a letter in support, no other comments in support for or in opposition to have been received, and staff has not received any comment in support for or in opposition to this request for variance. ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT REPORT -SUPPLEMENT A Report Supplement to: CASE NO: OV10-00-11a & OV10-00-11b Hearing Date: August 22, 2000 Agenda Item No.: 1 & 2, Continued from July 25 meeting. Prepared By: Dee Widero, Senior Zoning Inspector REQUEST: AT&T Wireless PCS Services,Inc., request a variance to increase the height for a flag pole installation from the allowed 27.5 to a 50' height. If the height variance is approved a second variance request for a Major Communication Facility using the flagpole as a camouflage by the stealth application for an antenna to reduce the required setbacks from the required 62.5' to 34.1'. Subject property location, The Vistoso Golf Maintenance Facility, 955 W. Pebble Creek, Oro Valley,AZ 85737. REQUEST SPECIFICS: Planning staff has for the above referenced projects, utilized the Rancho Vistoso (RV) Planned Area Development (PAD) and Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised(OVZCR). The proposed major communication facility will be located in the RVPAD Recreation Area/Golf Course land use designation. Since there are no guidelines specified in the RVPAD for the Recreation area/Golf Course designation,the staff utilized (As interpreted by Bryant Nodine) RV PAD's Resort district for design guidance, as it is intended to provide for recreation and golf uses. Under the permitted uses section in the Resort district, the RV PAD refers to the permitted uses in the R-4R Resort district of the OVZCR, Sec 7-203. And a major communication facility is allowed with a conditional use permit(CUP) in the R4-R district. The height restriction for a major communication facility is 50 feet in R4-R zoning district. SITE ANALYSIS: The area surrounding the Flagpole site is all Planned Area Development; the Maintenance facility is within the Vistoso Golf Course;to the south high density residential Neighborhood 10, Parcels O&P;on the north is Vistoso Golf Casitas II and the northeast is Vistoso Resort Casitas. The closest public street use is the street directly adjacent to the purposed location, Pebble Creek Drive. This street currently ends at the facility so traffic is minimal. In the future this street will be complete and serve future subdivisions. The site is also within the view of the rear units of the Resort Casitas (approx. 600' distance from flagpole) and the Golf Casitas (approx. 400' distance from flagpole site). However this site is at least 10' lower than these properties. PLAN ANALYSIS: The applicant is proposing to install a flagpole at the Golf Maintenance Facility in Neighborhood 11. This site was chosen because it is a permanent maintenance facility. The Rancho Vistoso Partners have given approval for this flagpole structure to be placed at their maintenance facility location. SUMMARY: Staff finding of facts: • The Golf Maintenance Facility is not greater than 22' in height. The zoning code allows a maximum height of 27.5' for the proposed flagpole, AT&T is asking for an additional 22.5' above maximum allowed and 28' above the adjacent building. • The flagpole location is approximately 400' to the nearest residence. • The site location requested for variance, sits 10' below grade of Vistoso Highlands Drive. • If this variance request is approved, the applicant will then move forward on to agenda item#2 OV 10-00-11 b, to reduce the setback for a Major Communication Facility for an antenna application to the approved flagpole. The Board of Adjustment should consider the following findings in making its decision: A. That there are special circumstances or conditions applying to the property referred to in the application including its size, shape, topography, location or surroundings which do not apply to other properties in the district; and B. That special circumstances were not created by the owner or applicant; and C. That the authorizing of the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights; and D. That any variance granted imposes such conditions as will assure that the authorizing of the adjustment shall not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which such property is located; and E. That the authorizing of the variance will not be materially detrimental to persons residing in the vicinity, to adjacent property, to the neighborhood or the public welfare in general. 2 SUGGESTED MOTION: The Board may wish to consider the following motions: I move to approve OV 10-00-1 la,a request to allow a height increase to a flagpole from the allowed 27.5' to 50'. OR I move to approve OV 10-00-1 la,as submitted by the applicant with the following stipulations: (Staff does not have any stipulations to offer) OR I move to deny OV 10-00-1 la, fording(Board to state reason why the variance cannot be granted) that: ATTACHMENTS: 1. BOA Application 2. Proposed Site Plan 3. Location map 4. Code references F:\OV\oV 10\2000-11 aAT&T.doc 3 SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS Sec. 13-301 ARTICLE 13-3. SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS Sec. 13-301 Condominiums and Apartment Conversions All condominiums and townhouses and any apartment buildings converted to condominiums shall meet the requirements for construction of multi-family dwelling units under the Group R, Division 3, requirements of the Uniform Building Code and all other applicable codes. Sec. 13-302 Liquor Uses The Town Council shall hold a public hearing and, for any use for which a liquor license is requested, notice of the hearing on such request shall be mailed to owners of property within 600 feet of the proposed use not less than 15 days before the hearing. The applicant for a license shall submit to the Town Clerk a verified list of the names and addresses of the record owners of such property. A fee, as approved by the Town Council, to cover costs of notification shall accompany the application. Sec. 13-303 Abandoned or Junk Vehicles A. All abandoned or junk vehicles undergoing major repairs or being restored shall be stored in an enclosed area by the owner or occupant of the property upon which such vehicle is located in such a manner as to not be visible from any point lying outside the property upon which abandoned or junk vehicle is stored or parked. B. For the purposes of this section: 1. Abandoned or junk vehicle means a vehicle or any major portion thereof which is incapable of movement under its own power and will remain so without major repair or reconstruction. 2. Major repair means the removal from any vehicle of a major portion thereof including, but not limited to, the differential, transmission, head, engine block or oil pan. 3. Vehicle means any self-propelled device in, upon, or by which any person or property is or may be transported upon a public highway excepting devices moved by human power or used exclusively upon stationary rails or tracks. Sec. 13-304 Flagpoles and Flags Flagpoles shall have a maximum height no greater than 1.25 times the height of the nearest adjacent building. The length of a flag shall be no greater than 1/4th the height of the flagpole. National and state flags are permissible. Flags used for the purpose of advertising or attracting attention to advertising are prohibited in accordance with Sec. 12-603 of this code. Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised 13 - 7 (Rev.8/94) Sec. 7-203 R-4R RESORT DISTRICT d. Off-street parking is provided in accordance with Sec. 11-104A. 8. Accessory buildings and uses customarily incidental to permitted uses, including private garages, home occupations, swimming pools, recreation buildings and walled driveway entrances. 9. Temporary real estates sales office provided the following conditions are met: a. The office shall be located within a model home built in accordance with the zoning where such office is located. b. Temporary real estate sales offices shall be permitted for a period not to exceed 2 years from the date of initial home sales. c. At his discretion, the Zoning Administrator may grant extensions of time at the termination of the initial 2 year period. d. At his discretion, the Zoning Administrator may grant permission for a temporary real estate sales office to be located in a portable structure. All such structures must be approved by the Zoning Administrator prior to installation (See. Sec. 2- 101, fora definition of Custom Home Subdivision). 10. Antennas (including satellite dishes up to 1 meter in diameter), subject to requirements set forth in Article 13-7. Satellite dish antenna exceeding 1 meter in diameter shall be subject to DRB review and recommendation, and staff approval per Section 3-302 and 13-702.A.4. 11. Minor Communication Facilities; subject to requirements set forth in Sec. 13-703.B. B. Uses Subject to Conditional Use Permit 1. Analogous uses per Sec. 5-201 C. 2. Major Communication Facilities, subject to requirements set forth in Sec. 9-117. 3. New utility poles and above ground wires. 4. Boarding house or lodging house and short-term rental properties, subject to the definition set forth in Sec. 2-101. 5. Timeshare Units, subject to Section 2-101, Definitions, and Section 9-109a, Timeshare Plan. Sec.7-204 Property Development Standards The following property development standards shall apply to all land and buildings in the R-4R District. A. Minimum Property Size The overall site shall contain a minimum of 50 acres prior to street dedications. Oro valley Zoning Code Revised (Rev.9/99) 7-6 Sec.9-115 CONDITIONS FOR SPECIFIC USES F. Screen Walls: 1. Screen walls which front on a public street shall be stuccoed, have mortar wash finish or otherwise be designed to match the main building on the site. Such walls shall be a minimum of 3 feet in height. 2. When adjacent to any residential district, a 6 foot perimeter screen wall 3 feet from the adjoining property line shall be installed as part of the first phase of development. The wall shall be screened from any abutting residentially used or zoned property with plantings of 5 canopy trees and 20 shrubs per 100 lineal feet. In situations where two screen walls may be located 3 feet from each other,this requirement may be waived by the Town Council. G. Oracle Road Scenic Corridor Overlay District: 1. All regulations of the Oracle Road Scenic Corridor Overlay District and the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised shall apply, except where a conflict occurs, in which case, the more restrictive regulation shall apply. The use intensity, building or site coverage or floor area ratio shall be established by the conditional use permit, if approved by the Town Council. H. And other conditions as specified by the Planning and Zoning Commission and Town Council. Sec.9-116 Golf Course No use permit for a golf course may be granted unless all requirements from the golf course overlay zone, as set forth in Article 10-5, Golf Course Overlay Zone Requirements, are met. Compliance with the provisions of this Article does not necessarily guarantee approval by the Town Council. Sec_9-117 Communication Facilities A. Conditional Use Standards for Major Communication Facilities. Major Facilities are those communication facilities over 20' in height, and are permitted up to a height of 150 feet, depending on zone,with a conditional use permit. Major Facilities are subject to the intent and requirements of the Town's Overlay districts, when a site qualifies as such. All of the following criteria and standards shall be met for a major communication facility: 1. A communication tower must be setback from the nearest property line, building and overhead wire,a distance at least equal to 1.25 times its total height. 2. The maximum height of the communication tower shall be determined by the zoning of the site. Height restrictions are listed in Table 9-117.A. 3. The visual impact of the tower shall be minimal. To this end, all communication facility towers shall be constructed with STEALTH applications. The Commission will consider Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised (Rev.7/9'7) 9-30 Sec.9-117 CONDITIONS FOR SPECIFIC USES These modifications shall require review by the Development Review Board. Table 9-117.A HEIGHT RESTRICTIONS FOR MAJOR COMMUNICATION FACILITIES ZONE MAXIMUM HEIGHT R1-144 up to 50' R1-43 R1-36 R4-R R1-20 up to 40' R1-10 R1-7 restricted to R-4 building height R-S of the zone R-6 SDH-6 PS&C C-N C-1 up to 150' C-2 T-P Sec.9-118 Special Use Permits for Temporary Uses A. Administrative Approval Required The Planning and Zoning Director may approva permits for special uses (see Sec. 2-101 for definition) for any temporary use of property, developed or undeveloped, within the Town of Oro Valley. B. Application Submittal and Fee Not less than 15 days prior to the scheduled event,the applicant shall present five copies of an Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised (Rev.12/97) 9-34 Sec. 13-702 COMMUNICATION STRUCTURES & FACILITIES b. Color. Fully screened antenna may be of any color. 3. Satellite Dishes exceeding 2 meters in diameter. Approval from the Development Review Board, at a regularly scheduled meeting, is required for all ground or building mounted satellite dish antennas that are over 2 meters in diameter. The following standards and materials shall be included with an application for DRB review: a. A maximum diameter of 15 feet will be permitted. b. Ground mounted satellite dishes are permitted only in the rear yard, unless rear yard location provides an indirect line of site to the satellite, in which case may be located in the side yard. c. A minimum two-thirds of the satellite dish must be screened with either landscaping or a solid wall. d. The maximum elevation of the foundation for ground mounted antenna is not to exceed 1 foot. e. Height. The maximum height of building mounted antenna that are over 2 meters in diameter shall be the minimum height that is necessary for reception of radio waves. f. Application submittals shall include an application, a site plan, dimensions of the antenna, and justification for need. Sec. 13-703 Communication Facilities A. Applicability: No communications facility shall be erected or installed except in compliance with the provisions of this Section. The provisions of this Section apply to all communications equipment, whether such equipment is used as a main use or an accessory use. Where conflicts exist between this Section and the remainder of the Code, the more restrictive Section shall apply. B. Minor Communication Facilities: 1. Standards for Minor Facilities. Minor Facilities are permitted in all zones with Development Review Board approval. All of the following criteria shall be met for a minor facility; otherwise, it will be considered a major facility: a. All minor facilities shall be constructed using STEALTH applications (camouflaging) for the antennae. b. All minor facilities shall either be located on existing buildings, poles or other Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised 13 - 19 (Rev.2/97) -s Sec. 13-703 COMMUNICATION STRUCTURES & FACILITIES emissions from the proposed project are within the limits set by the FCC. 5. The project must demonstrate it will have minimal visual impact. C. Major Communication Facilities (those facilities that are over 20' in height) are subject to a conditional use permit, as outlined in Sec. 9-1 17 (Communication Facilities). Once a Use Permit has been obtained, a Communication Facility Plan shall be prepared and submitted for Development Review Board approval. Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised 13 - 21 (Rev.2/97) _v- %'•-7(- 7 ?— r/--/''2 7 �Yl-;7?:g / ^ 7/V G /--a9j n,,ice '-j /23- �6�,'��GiG�% if,--.-,,----- -,---) �/////7) ,te-(��00,/7l � � / o , y_2 r r- 27 _-7✓4 z a r7>/� rye--�,.(/ ,ram;-9? _,,i7 72-07-r, F('I'/�0 _•r;,� > 7` ./-21 (/ 9/ :r,-�,,r7�Y,,-/,j--> / `/7 rJf0/y� ��� 1 L- r ,-,2-7-7,- ,_,----,,-,,-,,,,-,-,;.-w-it.e,-- .77.)-9,r,"° .7-7-i: it .tr -)--1-2?-7.2 -/?-',2 /7/ c"-- ,. ? ;1--vi-2/.//v-,...:0444)cr-,;}--, ty---yo --,,'r.:X /-"- -?Ip,r-e.27 r??Z7 -77 7,-7 • 4, i. ;74, 'T,�1/-z/z l' r)>1-z--9 7 T - =C-*7.('J7. f�''� ,Jl�''J,�` r/,7, r. •,,. _, 17/4.77 _ . . ---w.,,--2/-*/. 1,/ s),.r'2/P 19 2 ,--,7 7-'-r� .-- l-'07!: r GJ/ "-7-SdJ---) .+-)�►�_ ,0--7-7 v i. ,-�i i- .. a, . Y(''/)1J 2� r: , 7 7777 !'-fc �' 157 vtz��!� 1---�✓/"'✓r /:y ram, ?" '7 / z7 j 7(77 :,(70 ,,,A-(2-A.4 5.,-4,:j7:2",,f7,1.4.,7 41--T,1,-,,x4/..,,,ix ?,-ri7,-22 it'' 1?/�l0 7— 19 .r`�i' 7p' , �'r''2'9' may) `2 leW722 > e,,,p-i2, -c -,2-,-6e ,,,,4f4,2 -2,,,27,96-2, - AA:,/,,c) ,, A7. G" � ,- 4)-/7"--,7- 7-x- �� 7' 7Y 2 r /'/70,,,'7 <-_,, „ >- / ii it---7'-1:2Gel/7--- /-Gr2 A-e---930 .12 Z,..4-7, if---- 2,r;0 I kr!, 1 .,,P ifif 747.3 >/G72 0 27 X � ) -/_ �T ,,,, _0.7/ i__, i A2 /,_, „ , ., P 1??,,k( " 97;7 •`)77->--22`?1) 7(7-7 1f (.00../z 0_.o (,..4,7 /77, ?"-XV,/.272-7 .?_2.4,..7297-- -;_y-7.7 -77-v . .„zo ./ / /,` �y/� y ,y y� -yam / L r --x9 7?71-7r 7C .e'' 7''`'7r ;-/; ,--7i' /Uri /-A/ (/ 7? A 7i-9-.,/n29 z-7'1'2',? r'?7s ?j77 77 r --A' !lit?-7:17 2r/7t72 62-277 i-',/ t-'5' ‘•f • 7 , 44-7-r p,t---r)-vci-) ., -) Ipi°t, l V V jI CI ç •/ eta ) „ o:K-2). . / L/ (, lI ° 11 //-(2(7 0/0 0 .. 1.. to-a 9tZ989Z£T6 L£S£87, .,O J J J, A . .,v v T v s .v 1 • C//CQ_ -e_?_.e d. i e ( C-(ij-P_ /"/ /-4,- }J !--, "1-1 Cam"! 1' a. ✓z_,k_ -- Fr7`7tA7 // Cf-77e:. .1 CT 6_,QQ ;!-0Z , a_d_. 6e.P,'TC/h i a(. �� ee -� c _e �3`z�-f /,A ,-� t ' cam» Um_ C e 'J v'�� ti/IS cx-4#(pai 7-..7 --6) c? ) g / 4-'2e7 -,_-7,—,:e_42-,-; 6,- ..W&-e G , zinc,(-(--1..(- u/o-ceLf % ov c_ .oet�-e_-- ,•- �</ �1/�( .ate c.-o "/‘,. �'c=c. i D c_c_e� 7zG GtJ ems-- -:::-_-.A_, ,,,, d, ,42. ,-/rt l'i- ✓--" .-CG %.-/e(?,(47 --geej-et-ed-Z. 6.."<::-.-- -77,ra.A., ' (1-1-e:, .> __•,-: Ce/fie-, 6e/-7dZ---/-2 —AL// -1-7 C -,9/.-- - ---'\-‘-- ,1['V-- --P--e: re_9:;-// Ce_..-e'l/Z- -e.e.-1-Ge_--X G"-Z., G;!i1 Cat fie: l/J lli%c v % ' C2. 6 elm s�� C'XI7"j nc 0 OC -16Gi'L ,e)'J7 G'C "CG-L,__/jA2 v"7 /C,z____4_7-/,r __'4l�'1 i .. (L9 Z Zt Ge-2/?., =me- a_..eo r ' /o 4 e-,6 -, 0,7(..e_ (-,7=4_,?'c..-/7 4,__teA.7 c7,-- 7,-/y /z,..5;-'zezi-7' ,,-e ,_- ' ice ls�, 'ci�7c�iG' - .y¢:,„/„.. ._44.,,,:,,,,_, 6-4, 62_, "C,,,, ,_72,<_/ (,•/) e>(/6.!)j - __,,,, ,_,a__,G6-2-L.--7 e;.416,-Ge_1/d/ /7,s--/(7-7*.4e_e_4•71....._ a_ .___Agzzz 7 .,-, (:€.4./- ____4,-7--2.' e.e,,,e , 7_,,,./ __ _,:1--,;OL7,>-&-e__.-- --Z-2-y } L'! a-e- C�7'I C%-eC�G "9-4t� _-1 �.7- Coif7C- - ye.e. .(ce. • 6(2-e 2A-/ da--/CZ ./_'4f-Ci/e --/-L-/ cz-e_.". (.6-7‘ ,77o----741 G )o-4 JJ l __ ._, a-,,7 - - �-,.%,',-,,, ":„_- �z ND Uo--e6 -114- (-'/Cr "fib 4,7 d -Th ettj(,,,o efelahtekl : _(3td vi,0/7(hci 84/,(-457,_ '( '-I i Quia,iziq /6 o *i / !o!ram r 7 4J so . (34id, ( v CI Jul crq S- 3o Urtk46y1fz 6,523>- 1 fl'A .,,/ 91koi ,_r_, . _. ..,----.,--.0-0-- .-x->.----, ( -,- --"+"--YV _r_., z , , ji -, r-------, 5.'117174:— _____ 7,. ---',-- "t---d•--0-- rr ITh, --- _ , .7 `.-- --,- _,,.., .--717_71: , , c... L...?-1._, 5- s tw i, -1........,„„_?, ., e____ ---,,,..??"1 --- ic b ter7--- -r, - --0-4-----r-----4,-- a _.•,-"9,1.--'.•:':'- 2717 .- 2 ---9—12. 01 4. -„ -/ ,---- , ,, /,____„.„..„, „4, )---r- '1---‘ V -- --r- _ ;-- -)17- - - /'' .-- 14-1, ..----- --.<-). ---- < r-----3-,?,y_ --(/) - - , 47 qr-,-,-.7,47,-7.-4.-74-17 '..-\t- ,) t.,,- __Ir —0 I.--- -- --f7 /42 / 49-7-0 lc'# r C' 1 tir . ir T < ! 1 i 0--0 ) n a ,