Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOV100016 v d MINUTEStip ` BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT41, INFORMATION AND ORIENTATION MEETING STUDY SESSION DECEMBER 19,2000 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 11,000 N. LA CARADA DRIVE ORO VALLEY,ARIZONA CALL TO ORDER at 3:02 p.m. PRESENT: - Henry Suozzi, Chairman Bill Adler,Vice Chairman James Swan, Member Lyra Done, Member Cindy Lewis, Member STAFF: Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk Dan Dudley, Town Attorney Bryant Nodine, Planning and Zoning Administrator Dee Widero, Senior Zoning Inspector Debbie Moran, Zoning Tech. Linda Hersha, Secretary II 1. ROLE, RESPONSIBILITIES,MANDATE Bryant Nodine, Planning and Zoning Administrator explained that the roles and responsibilities have been well established by the Town Code and by Arizona State Law. Discussion continued regarding the following issues: • Appeals • Zoning and Boundaries • The 5 Criteria update • To implement an evaluation process for Board member's when their term expires and require each Board member participation. • The composition of the Board • A description of duties, goals and expectations Mr. Nodine gave a brief outline of the duties performed by staff. Clerk's Office • Making room arrangements • Mailing of materials • Minutes of meetings • Scheduling of meeting with the direction from Planning and Zoning 12/19/00 Minutes,Board of Adjustment 2 Study Session • Posting the agenda • Contacting the Clerk's Office for issues concerning the agenda, with the direction of Planning and Zoning Planning and Zoning • The Chair should be aware of when any revisions that are made to the agenda. • Planning and Zoning Department is the primary contact for issues pertaining to the agenda. • The Planning and Zoning Department develops the agenda with the Chairman's direction and the applications submitted. • The Planning and Zoning Department will notify the property owners within the 300 feet radius of the public hearing. Discussion followed regarding the Board of Adjustment Application and the 5 Criteria's. The following suggestions were made: • All exhibits should be submitted with the application on or 1 week prior to the meeting. • Packets are delivered 1 week prior to meeting. • Notify the Board members as soon as possible when a meeting has been canceled. • Members should notify Dee Widero if they are unable to attend a meeting. • A staff member should be present from the various departments for resource purposes, depending upon the subject matter and content of the application. 2. FIVE CRITERIA FOR VARIANCE Dan Dudley, Town Attorney explained that the 5 Criteria's require a finding upon sufficient evidence. The following recommendations were discussed: • The applicant addresses the findings accordingly. • The applicant should show proof why their variance request has met the 5 findings. • The Board will expect the applicant to respond to questions regarding the 5 findings. Mr. Nodine gave a brief outline of the materials required when submitting a Board of Adjustment Application: 1. Plans that indicate the nature of the project and its proposed use. 2. Evidence that indicate the intention of the applicant to proceed with the actual construction. 3. Filing fee (All documents are retained for public availability.) Mr. Nodine stated that the Code did not negate a clear requirement for the applicant to address the 5 findings. The following recommendations were discussed: • The application should be revised to make the 5 Criteria's a requirement. • Definition of"Special Privilege"—an adj unct to equal protection. (Example: "If there is more than one applicant with similar circumstances,both applicants should be treated the same.") • 12/19/00 Minutes,Board of Adjustment 3 Study Session Mr. Dudley explained that under the Arizona State Law the Board of Adjustment is aquasi-judicial Board that hears and decides appeals for variances from the terms of the Zoning Ordinance and hears appeals of the decision of the Zoning Administrator. 3. RECOMMENDED PROCEDURES/CONDUCT OF MEETINGS • The Board members should not discuss any issues that are not on the agenda before, during or after meeting. To do so, would be a violation of the open meeting law. • Board member should not discuss issues with the owner or applicant when inspecting the site. • Questions of fact are not an issue when reviewing the site. • Stay focused during the presentation. • All questions during the meeting should go through the Chair. • All documents that are submitted at the meeting should be given to the Clerk for proper distribution. • All applicants could be sworn in at once. 4. ANY BOARD RULES AND IF SO, WHAT? Mr. Nodine explained that the rules for Board of Adjustment would be discussed at a later date. The following concerns were discussed regarding: • Limiting speakers to 3 minutes. • Should minutes reflect the reason why a Board member votes aye or nay? • An additional Study Session will be held in January to continue discussion on Board Orientation and Training. ADJOURNMENT Chairman Suozzi adjourned the meeting at 5:10 p.m. Respectfully submitted, 9- ; , Linda Hersha, Secretary II NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE ORO VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT In accordance with Sec. 1-708 of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised and Arizona Revised Statutes Sec. 9-462.06, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Oro Valley Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, February 23,2001, commencing at or after 3:00 p.m. The meeting will be held at the Oro Valley Town Hall, 11000 N. La Cafada Drive and the subject matter will be as further described below: OV10-00-16: ADDISIGNS (CYNTHIA BUJAK) FOR LEXIMAR LLC, OF EL CONQUISTADOR EXECUTIVE PLAZA REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO REMOVE THE EXISTING ENTRYWAY SIGN. LOCATED ON GREENOCK DRIVE AND REPLACE IT WITH A SIMILAR SIGN TO BE LOCATED ON THE WALL FACING ORACLE ROAD ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ORACLE ROAD AND GREENOCK DRIVE. (OVZCR SEC 12-502.C.7). SUBJECT PROPERTY: 10195 N. ORACLE ROAD, ORO VALLEY, AZ 85737. Addisigns Company is requesting that El Conquistador Executive Plaza be allowed to relocate one existing directory sign. The proposed sign would look similar to the existing sign, but would be much more beneficial to direct and aid the traffic flow to the south entrance rather than down Greenock Road. It is the position of the El Conquistador Plaza that relocating the entryway sign will greatly improve safety in the surrounding residential community by reducing the flow of traffic on Greenock Drive Plans are available for review during normal business hours at the Oro Valley Town Hall, Community Development Building. Persons interested may appear in person, by agent or attorney, and the petitioners must appear or be represented. Any person seeking further information on this request for a variance may contact Dee Widero at 229-4812. Bryant M.Nodine,AICP Planning and Zoning Administrator F:\ov\Ovi0\2000\10-00-16\NOTICE.doc AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION , r STATE OF ARIZONA) :ss. COUNTY OF PIMA ) being first i.'61%F t,i 1:?::,+'f.;•;{,,,A fir duly sworn, deposes and says that (he) (she) is the Legal Advertising Manager of THE DAILY TERRITORIAL, a daily newspaper printed and published in the County of Pima, State of Arizona, and of general circulation in the City of Tuc- son, County of Pima, State of Arizona and elsewhere, and the hereto attached EL CONQUISTADOR REQUEST TO REMOVE EXISTING SIGN PUBLIC NOTICE was printed and published correctly in the regular and entire issue of said THE DALLY TERRITORIAL for 1 issues; that was first made on the day of JANUARY 20 01 and the last publication thereof was made on the 8TH day of JANUARY 20 ; that said publication was made on each of the following dates, to-wit: 01/08/01 Request of TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Daily Territorial By A Subsc'r bedand sworn to before me tti day of 8T 40.1-444 OFFICIAL SEAL -t' 20 �y !. STACEY STINSON L. 1 Notary Public qi ., 1 Pima County,Arizona !' .,*` My Commission Expires, February 6,2001 Notary Public in and for the County of Pima, State of Arizona My Commission Expires: :Z ( LQ � 0 tJOTICE OF PUBLIC NEARING BEFORE THE ORO VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT In accordance with Sec. 1-708 of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised and Arizona Revised Statutes Sec. 9- 462.06, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Oro Valley Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing on Tuesday,February 23,2001, commencing at or after 3:00 p.m.The meeting will be held at the Oro Valley Town Hall, 11000 N. La Canada Drive and the subject matter will be as further described below: OV10-00-16: ADDISIGNS (CYNTHIA BUJAK) FOR LEXIMAR LLC, OF EL CONQUISTADOR EXECUTIVE PLAZA REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO RE- MOVE THE EXISTING ENTRYWAY SIGN. LOCATED ON GREENOCK DRIVE AND REPLACE IT WITH A SIM- ILAR SIGN TO BE LOCATED ON THE WALL FACING ORACLE ROAD ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ORA- CLE ROAD AND GREENOK DRIVE. (OVZCR SEC 12-502.'0.7). SUBJECT PROPERTY:10195 N.ORACLE ROAD, ORO VALLEY,AZ 85737. Addisigns Company is requesting that El Conauistador Executive Plaza be al- lowed to relocate one existing directory sign.The proposed sign would look sim- ilar to the existing sign, but would be much more beneficial to direct and aid the traffic flow to the south entrance rather than down Greenrock Road. It is the position of the El Conquistador Pla- za that relocating the entryway sign will greatly improve safety in the surround- ing resiaential community by reducing the flow of traffic on Greenrock Drive Plans are available for review during normai business hours at the Oro Valley Town Hall, Community Development Building. Persons interested may ap- pear ;n person, by agent or attorney, and the petitioners must appear or be represented.Any person seeking further information on this request for a var- iance may contact Dee Widero at 229- 4812. Dee Widero Bryant M. Nodine, AICP Planning and Zoning Administrator Pub:The Daily Territorial January 8,2001 Req:Town of Oro Valley pnovl0-00-16 em TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 11000 N. LA CANADA DR. 4 y '. ORO VALLEY,ARIZONA 85737 ' r \,. - - SAN JOSE PLAZA LLC '`- F 1Gl v R PO BOX 36894 , 1�'Su� - *IS TUCSON AZ j - SU p-�EC .,c 85741-0000 �M�EPA AC- 4M1�, RE . NI RETURN � •Day . low, T Lm, 13 i - •' ICJ C K S: .. ;'"7;•U t~ •8 4 lliiiiiiiiiliiiiiii 1ilitlliiliifiliilili1iiiiiilliliii{Fii!I TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Ar:• 77 11000 N. LA CAFIADA DR. A ORO VALLEY,ARIZONA 85737 11111ECMIL ALS-VENTURE I INC 450 N SUNNYSLOPE RD #300 JAN b ZUU1 Li BROOKFIELD WI 53005-0000 BY:124SalArl-d-- ALTE450* 530052015 1100 aLt 01/17/01 FORWARD TIME EXP RTN TO SEND :ALTERNATIVE LIVING SERVICES 10000 W INNOVATION DR MILWAUKEE WI 53226-4837 r RETURN TO SENDER ' -.711- • • - :-SA.16P-4At-u TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 5 11000 N. LA CANADA DR. PM s. �rORO VALLEY,ARIZONA 85737 SANS JOSE PLAZA LLC JV A�Ol',V V l) SS PO BOX 36894 ,k3n 1 TUCSON AZ , 1NSUFFICIE Uki R 85741-0000 3 O SUS . NO1- KN. NG RECEPI 4001 OWN SE / .. ffic. N-r- Ammnionsommumip RETURN •Ziab -n IOC? o,, , 13 f 6 47 ' ti 1 u 4 1{!liiiiiilliilifiiifilfiJlifliliiifllfalfI 1F1llftldlillflfla TOWN OF ORO VALLEY soN q(:, 11000 N. LA CANADA DR. PM ..-- --_--- ORO VALLEY,ARIZONA 85737 r"""~-{ — ..---—�---- o ___)) ....-- IECEEIMIZI JAN 2 9 2001 L, BY:22 .1l. ALS-VENTURE I INC • 450 N SUNNYSLOPE RD#300 ALTE450' 53Oo52022 1100 20 0i/23/01 BROOKFIELD WI FORWARD TIME L'XP RTN TO SEND 53005-0000 :ALTERRA HEALTH CARE CORPORATION i0000 W INNOVATION DR MILWAUKEE Wi 53 b-483/ RETURN TO SENDER ii i I i I I it i iii S�sr.101S—aesa 40 iifiili ni: 3iiiiiii=ffi i# 131': lillrIIIIIIIIII TOWN OF ORO VALLEY rc�c�`d7 ,\ �-_= 11000 N. LA CANADA DR. vr� - t-� I ;�. e�e'11�+#v'ms-._...a.,r..1'`,..,4.w�.._�_-�.rew.-..�'_'. ORO VALLEY,ARIZONA 85737 Keturned For .0 ~ �`' . , Be#f 4ddresa trs .. • SHERWOOD JACK II 1/2 INT&KRAUSS FAMILY LP 1/2 INT 00000-0000 CORRECTION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE ORO VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT In accordance with Sec. 1-708 of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised and Arizona Revised Statutes Sec. 9-462.06, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Oro Valley Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, January 23, 2001, commencing at or after 3:00 p.m. The meeting will be held at the Oro Valley Town Hall, 11000 N. La Canada Drive and the subject matter will be as further described below: OV10-00-16: ADDISIGNS (CYNTHIA BUJAK) FOR LEXIMAR LLC, OF EL CONQUISTADOR EXECUTIVE PLAZA REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO REMOVE THE EXISTING ENTRYWAY SIGN. LOCATED ON GREENOCK DRIVE AND REPLACE IT WITH A SIMILAR SIGN TO BE LOCATED ON THE WALL FACING ORACLE ROAD ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ORACLE ROAD AND GREENOCK DRIVE. (OVZCR SEC 12-502.C.7). SUBJECT PROPERTY: 10195 N. ORACLE ROAD, ORO VALLEY, AZ 85737. Addisigns Company is requesting that El Conquistador Executive Plaza be allowed to relocate one existing directory sign. The proposed sign would look similar to the existing sign, but would be much more beneficial to direct and aid the traffic flow to the south entrance rather than down Greenock Road. It is the position of the El Conquistador Plaza that relocating the entryway sign will greatly improve safety in the surrounding residential community by reducing the flow of traffic on Greenock Drive Plans are available for review during normal business hours at the Oro Valley Town Hall, Community Development Building. Persons interested may appear in person, by agent or attorney, and the petitioners must appear or be represented. Any person seeking further information on this reque t for a variance may contact Dee Widero at 229-4812. Bryant M.Nodine, AICP Planning and Zoning Administrator , \\OV_PZD\PZl\OV\OV10\2000\10-00-16\NOTICE.doc \.. �' ovi 0.001.1 6 _________ way_L____ vs.., 1h\ // % 1 - SA, . '*- Atiiii, 104 f.s _7,13-,..,,,,,.„,,, 6 0 - ' .400,10, "' t� �� • m ikvillowilittiort, � iu• • 1a tra 1��r0_4. unumpor4ti ;�� jrj .(T.. ireA/ a oress44S-neaDr1.41111 Parcels .Doheny PI ' .I,' --10111111Filtit.7'.,LIA' 114 ill 7ii.......1 rC'l�rc�i2 - J eao I W E 0.3 0 0.3 0.6 Miles mimiiiim S ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT REPORT CASE NO: OV10-00-16 Hearing Date: January 23,2001 Agenda Item No.: 1 Prepared By: Dee Widero, Senior Zoning Inspector REQUEST: ADDISIGNS INCORPORATED (CYNTHIA BUJAK) FOR LEXIMAR LLC, OF EL CONQUISTADOR EXECUTIVE PLAZA REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO REMOVE THE EXISTING ENTRYWAY SIGN AT THE ENTRANCE OF GREENOCK DRIVE. RELOCATE WITH A SIMILAR SIGN TO BE LOCATED ON THE WALL FACING ORACLE ROAD ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SUBJECT PROPERTY (OVZCR SEC. 12-502.B). SUBJECT PROPERTY LOCATION: 10195 N. ORACLE ROAD,ORO VALLEY,AZ 85737. REQUEST SPECIFICS: Addisigns Inc. is requesting that El Conquistador Plaza be allowed to relocate one existing entryway sign. The proposed sign would look similar to the existing sign, but may be more beneficial to direct and aid the traffic flow to the south entrance rather than down Greenock Road. The owner/developer of El Conquistador Plaza, Manuel Gadea, feels that removing the existing entryway sign from Greenock Drive,and relocating one at the corner of Greenock Drive and Oracle Road will greatly improve the safety for the surrounding residential community by reducing the flow of traffic on Greenock Drive. The OVZCR Sec. 12.502.B.7 allows only one sign per street frontage. Section 12-502.B.4 states the setback to be a minimum of 5' from property line. The existing wall is only 1.8"from property line. SITE LOCATION: El Conquistador Executive Plaza is located at 10195 N. Oracle Road. South of Greenock Drive and west of Oracle Road as shown on the attached location map. NOTIFICATION: All property owners within 300 feet of this property have been notified of this hearing. The property has been posted with a Notice of Hearing and the Hearing Notice has been advertised in the Daily Territorial newspaper. At the time of report preparation, staff has not received comment in support of or in protest to this request. SITE ANALYSIS: El Conquistador Executive Plaza is a 2.39-acre parcel located south of Greenock Drive on the west of Oracle Road. The property is between 7 and 10 feet below the existing grade of Oracle Road. The subject property is abutted to the south by the Clare Bridge facility, Oro Valley Townhouses complex to the west, and Oracle Road on the east. The Rockridge Apartments are located north of the site. The right-of-way width of Oracle Road in this area is 300 feet. From center line of Oracle Road to the existing south entrance is approximately 190', that entry sign sit approximately 156' from center of Oracle Road. The proposed sign would sit approximately 153' from the center of Oracle Road. PLAN ANALYSIS: The applicant is proposing to remove the existing entryway sign on Greenock Drive and place an entryway sign (with an arrow directing to the south entrance) on the corner of Greenock Drive and Oracle Road. This would direct access onto El Conquistador Plaza property at the south entrance off of Oracle Road, next to and north of the Clare Bridge facility. SUMMARY: The following finding facts exist: • There are special circumstances or conditions. 1) The location of entry on Greenock Drive being next to residential property. 2) The topography of the property and the curve of Oracle Road for south bound travel, make the south entry sign hard to see until you are passing it, causing possible hazard conditions. • The owner/developer,did not create this condition. • Granting this variance would allow the general public to find and enter the offices more safely. • This adjustment would not constitute special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity, as the other properties in the vicinity are not on the curve or on a corner,which is what is causing the circumstance. • The authorizing of this variance request will not be materially detrimental to persons residing in the vicinity, to adjacent property, to the neighborhood or the public welfare in general. The granting of variance would help direct traffic away from the residential neighborhood. The Board of Adjustment should consider the following findings in making its decision: A. That there are special circumstances or conditions applying to the property referred to in the application including its size, shape, topography, location or surroundings which do not apply to other properties in the district; and B. That special circumstances were not created by the owner or applicant; and C. That the authorizing of the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights; and 2 D. That any variance granted imposes such conditions as will assure that the authorizing of the adjustment shall not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which such property is located; and E. That the authorizing of the variance will not be materially detrimental to persons residing in the vicinity, to adjacent property, to the neighborhood or the public welfare in general. SUGGESTED MOTIONS: The Board may wish to consider the following motions: I move to approve OV 10-00-16, a request to remove the existing sign on Greenock Drive and place a entry way sign on an existing wall at the corner of Oracle Road and Greenock Drive. OR I move to approve OV 10-00-16, with the following stipulations to meet the intent of applicable sections of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised: OR I move to deny OV 10-00-16, finding that: ATTACHMENTS: 1. BOA application 2. Site plan 3. Location map 4. Code references F:\OV\OV 10\2000\10-00-16.doc 3 Sec. 12-502 SIGNS 9. Illumination: Internal (provided only characters emit light, or pan channel), or a combination thereof(See Sec. 12-402, Lighting and Movement). B. Shopping Center(Commercial Complex)Entry-Way Sign 1. Description: Signs which identify, by name and address, the entrance to any shopping center or commercial development ten (10) acres or greater in size. Names of anchor tenants may also appear,within the permitted sign area. 2. Location: The sign shall be located at the main entrance of the center and shall be so placed as not to interfere with traffic in anyway, or to present a traffic hazard. 3. Landscaping: The sign shall be placed in a landscaped setting either on the ground or in raised planters constructed as an integral part of the sign structure. Said landscape treatment shall extend three (3) feet from the sign base on all sides, if double-faced. For single-faced signs, the landscape treatment must extend a minimum of three(3)feet in front, and to sides, of the sign structure. 4. Setbacks: Five(5)foot minimum from property line. 5. Area of sign: Fifty (50)square feet maximum. 6. Height: Six(6)feet above grade. 7. Quantity: Each commercial complex shall be permitted one sign per street frontage, to be located at the main entrance into the center. If any one street frontage exceeds 1,500 feet in lineal dimension, a second sign on that frontage may be permitted, for a maximum of three (3)such signs per complex. 8. Form: freestanding, monolith-type, may be double-faced. An entry-way sign shall contain the name of the commercial complex and a maximum of four anchor tenants. 9. Illumination: Direct, internal, provided only characters emit light, halo-illumination, or a combination thereof(See Sec. 12-402, Lighting and Movement). C. Freestanding Business Entry-Way Sign 1. Description: Signs which identify, by name, the entrance to a single, freestanding business and churches. Not associated with a commercial complex by ownership or access points. Said signs shall be so placed as to not interfere with traffic in any way, or to present a traffic hazard. Churches and theaters may have change panels on their signs. 2. Location: The sign shall be located at the main entrance to the business. 3. Landscaping: The sign shall be placed in a landscaped setting, either on the ground or in raised planters constructed as an integral part of the sign structure. Said landscape treatment must extend three (3) feet from the sign base on all sides, if double-faced. For single-faced signs, the landscape treatment must extend a minimum of three (3) feet from the base of the sign face and three(3)feet on each end. Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised (Rev.6/99) 12- 14 Community Development 520 742 1022 P. 1 s4P4�er qR,�o TOWN OF ORO VALLEY - U \iv 1E �� y' PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION 4 .;,.�.► moo N.LA CANADA DRIVE,ORO VALLEY AZ 85737 V '' LI Phone: (520)229-4800 Fax:(520)742-1022 D E C 2 8 2030 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION s FOR: V "Coning Variance —Zoning Interpretation Appeal of Administrative Decision CASE NO.: C3 LI/C -on —/ N• ' ,OF REQUEST: ) wiry . /#1) kmiect c2/1 „Le69 Tr Ia., 1- _4 • 4- wi'Vt) ,_ 147)/a si• - d ao _LIZU A 411/MNIBVPI- - lirmillowifig"• r jrarffiffiAMIEal -S i 7- 5 6g 0) 7. APPLICANT: (Lid,,,z4) PHONE/FAX; SD'� 7 � J 46' : /c .-Ci ADDRESS: ,g E, �✓ � / L� ` �%� g-5-7j OWNER: fr_ y / l.// ` r CI.C_Tl G P/a z6b ADDRESS: /`& 5 4/ . o)/ PARCEL NUIViBER. <=;??4/-- 33 J3&9 J PROPERTY LOCATION/ DRESS: /0%� �sae../e /1)d LEGAL DESCRIPTION: P th Dn(') ,6/0 CJ 1 / )/f :)f ACREAGE: -3q CURRENT ZONING:APPLICABLE FEE: _ --XATTACHMENTS: ev) � `�� ,�� ` �TTA lot L`� 1,-)zakr 366' L.3 n or -Mc- - -e). �,— (146i 2n , a /2 0?7 0 Community Development 520 742 1022 p. 1 oQpa 4� LEY A �R�Oq TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION 41VAXI: kV 11,000 N.LA CANADA DRIVE,ORO VALLEY AZ 85737 ; : Phone: (520)229-4800 Fax:(520)742-1022 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION FOR: t4oning Variance Zoning Interpretation Appeal of Administrative Decision CASE NO.:a L1/0 -6-)CJ--/6 - N 'OF REQUEST: �� .2 0 Ili 64/ /l/ `�� /1 �?�Gr 'i< /fic 1-0 oro lh-e„to:a4 41/? ing Tr tu-e, a,nol (--(pa?to /1-1-- w iY1) a,.( 1,47?//ar l C iin. Cr s - --5 0OO�. 001 ar 1 1 D -_S-e& 17- 5 A) ) 7. APPLICANT: 6,41de-429712.4) PHONE/FAX: S� C) - 7 -/5`7-"c /,36) _ 5 7/ 9/�--c ADDRESS: E: 3 -6 L1(` L O - F57/- r OWNER:) &7)9a/:5indeg,reet_1(1/. I& Y ADDRESS: / 27/Z5 4/. 6),e_a()% _,---- -o 7 , Community Development 520 742 1022 p. 2 SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT (AND ALSO PRINT NAME) DATE F:.ADMfl FORMS\BOAAPP.doc SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONS FOR APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE 1. Identify difficulties or problems that would result from complying with the present zoning requirements. /-3 • 2. Identify and explain all unique and peculiar circumstances that would prevent you from complying with the present zoning requirements on your property in regard to the following areas (slope, narrowness, shallowness,irregular shape,location,washes,vegetation and easements,etc.). 3. Identify and explain any peculiar conditions in the surrounding area, which would keep you from complying with the present zoning requirements. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: 4. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING: The most current available list of property owners from the Pima County Assessor's Office and the date such list was obtained. 13 copies of dimensioned plot plan,if applicable 13 copies of dimensioned floor plan,if applicable 13 copies of building elevations,if applicable An estimate of the incremental cost of the change in,or additions to,the property,such estimated cost to be endorsed as accurate by a licensed contractor or engineer. Any additional comments/information you wish to provide regarding your request. 2 1 2-27-2000 n : 10PM FROM Ann I S i GNS 520 571 91 2P D 1 /477) ' Variance Request El Conquistador Executive Plaza 10195 N. Oracle Road Oro Valle,, AZ 85737 Addisigns is requesting a variance under the Oro Valley Sian Code for an entryway sign at Ei Conquistador Executive Plaza, located at 10195 N. Oracle Road. We are requesting that El Conquistador be allowed to relocate one existing directory sign, located on Greenock Drive to the wall located on the corner of Greenock and Oracle Road. The proposed sign would look similar to the existing sign, but would be much more beneficial to the surrounding residential community as a directional to aid the traffic flow to the north entrance rather than down Greenock Road. Please see the attached drawings of the current sign and the proposed sign. Please note that the new sign will contain clear entrance directions, easily visible to the 50mph traffic travelling down Oracle Road. Currently, because of the landscaping of the area surrounding the El Conquistador Plaza, it is difficult to find for traffic on Oracle Road. Changing the location of this sign will improve safety and visibility at this very busy intersection. it is the position of the El Conquistador Plaza that relocating the entryway sign will greatly improve safety in the surrounding residential community by reducing the flow of traffic on Greenock Drive. Greenock Drive, being a major residential street, has a significant amount of pedestrian traffic. The existing sign increases the flow of vehicular traffic on this street, thus diminishing the safety of the pedestrians and not deterring the increased traffic into the residential community. If you look at the property in conjunction with the proposed relocation of the entryway sign, it makes sense to allow for the variance, as requested, because of the congested area where the property is located. Additionally, if the variance is granted, it will allow increased visibility and safety to the pedestrian and vehicular traffic flow on Greenock Drive. Addisigns is not erecting an additional sign, we simply want to relocate the existing entryway sign and remove the existing entryway sign on Greenock Drive. This will also allow for reduced traffic, while improving visibility and safety in the area. The new configuration, as per the drawing, will not only provide additional safety, but will also beautify this shopping plaza, and help to maintain the feel of a residential area directly to the west_ This sign will not adversely affect, nor will it create,any kind of blockage, nor will it impede any visibility. With the relocation of the entryway sign, it will actually improve visibility that is needed for this particular location. Granting this variance will allow for an existing entryway sign to be removed, and a new entryway sign to be placed on the wall facing Oracle Road_ NOTE: This is an original unpublished drawing created by DRAWING # / FILE NAME ELCONQUISTADOiz WORK ORDER NO. ;CUSTOMER NAME MANUEL GADEA 529-6335 g , personal PHONE Addisi ns Inc{nc. It is submitted for your use in 529-6355 connection with a proposed project being planned for you by JOB NAME EL CONQUISTADOR EXECUTIVE PLAZA PHONE ;CUSTOMER ADDRESS FAX gns Inc. It is not to be shown to anyone outside your R '7?�7 ! BART HAYNES CHAD PARSONS organization. nor is it to be reproduced. copied. anlnG I nv��I c v n r,++T_ 7� i SUITE ZIPCAI DESIGNER fashion tho JOB ADDRESS IV1.lJ N. VI\ \1iLL 1\V. JVI{L LIf� IJVtIE 1 t without I -photographed, exhibited or used I+ anythe 2 SETS RpG/FCi' NON—ILLUM. ONTO 2 EXISTING F/S WALLS 4expressedwttenaPPr0va10f Addisignslnc. TYPE OF SIGN(S1 —_----_---------____._.._----_.-___ DATE REVISIONS ESTIMATE NO. INSTALL DATE PAGE OF �' 1651 �.. % .. _ , . . , 24" 10195.... . , i 1 I I 12'6„ nóvr . .......- • 12" El Conquistador DEC 28 �n� j - • Executive Plaza 6" . .. ..„ _ r "At ' b� �`.�Y 1 `r L--) '�' ri.{gs,; .a..rye. �, „�., ,.yF�,. - - -,,,'-'i� 1-"s-, 1. 9:5 .r.'a..� i J -,4,0,44- ,,:•.,-4.:--4- -,, -t,-,f,.-,;-,,---,,,,:,::i:-wit-_t._..1,..-.----*2,.4,,&4,-5--„7:,L-"-,,,4-.;..,_,-f...6i---,-.-_--,---i•,,;--;;_-=i-z--_i-,;-:--._,i-,-:/;--_,'n:.::-:--.__:,--'-.2-.-- - ._ ---_ -'-. -',(-,--:p-,1T 0--tii ' l 1(- 4:- )(63tr,c _ ---D • - i.,3, j i "'r" ej- yx '-- y , Ao s s., -4-f 'S. ti rid'"-j t Fr.„ i_'+ems _ - \ , 52, vs < P i 'z s yr „?n`�$w�;3t`��✓ :�i�y'?� 7X..+z���`^�"fi-��p.�+�' a�7.�' .tig _�',"��f .�e�s 1 '4 v.s i D ' 1 aN ate_b .w.: s• • ,` .'E`s „ 'r' Y 4 F# ten' ='cS. . r:;.„ 1wr. sdil 4. vi ,7714,,,IR,P4 weit,:l :-,-;.------ '- ---' . - - K-Awo+�� sas,?vw. �x!`i' .5 _.�..:•4"i,,--- 5 4'6+' -3: .- .. ,�..a:,.,.y..c.., <<s�.. : t:,�: xil - 1- K ..%,„s, ____:_, _.,,,t.,.:::,„ 12" . SCALE 1/2"=1-0" LPRIMARY CIRCUIT PROBLEMS YES CI 0 CUSTOMER NOTIFIED YES 0 NO CI ENERGIZED YES 0 NO CI DROPPED OFF YES D NO D KITES: aCJCJIII9AIADDISIGNS SIGNATURE;tiz. 3808 E. 38TH STREET/TUCSON, ARIZONA 85713 (520) 748- 1540 DATE ACCEPTED BUYER SIGNATURE , _ I . ,;,,. . ___, ...,_ . , .,_,/ ., . . /..... • . .. .1. • - - ..7:. - .___-__-_„.. )k ,-....., - 'V ----. 1-2e .,, ---- ,\ . .---,) -- / . /. ._, ... / .. Q" •• I / . ,/ .•• • / - ,,1, �� .,:. -¢ �`• \ ! \ / ADDISIGNS ..r: .. <k_/. .. . , ,, � ��/ - . ,. . . 1. ��'- )11-.4. . <,'���� �.� � - .\ .. _ . .. � -- . \. ... :f, � J d • • • P�� � \ = �\ \\ .: .e Never Leave You In The Dark , . (.1.:._. ..._....,..; ,.,,..,:....:.,:.; • -//1 • -' .;,- `/ ,�1; ► �i� '�� �►F` ,�� a �� / 1) (520) 748-1540 >, I y� , , can\ \ \1 ‘-' / . 7"----sz, . ... .ty IN, / •1 , /./7-_ ,..,.. /;.,_,. . dirleejr.4440‘ is- -. ..... 's\\•,„ :,Nr.,........:\:-6::: 1-( c/-•-le,\ ‘. • ' I ' e . • _ 7( /. •••••'.: ...--:-... -- -:: -- . () '''s. 7 / 1 7////. ' .' / / '. - - 1. ' ,./ / fri - 7 A 00V 4 \..._•_. *A --' .f\ N, - ' ---.\__\--\\, . . - - . • '. '. ---•* /: .. -.-.ki. f .** '. -,. . / . ,.. .,/ - • , i /. / ••; '7, i,.I ilr/ 401/" .- , 4--z--__-__\'.. ..14,. ,. ..4,, : -, \\\- I . . .. O: Q- - / �� ;- , - ��, 1. ..% \ ' -N. . i •_. . - .1 . • __\''r. .()\.- . ./ / / / / /. ....-- „ii .. . -. , // / ,•/. 1 • -,..1 --- lb, its \\ix-,\ . .._ ./ „/„..„,, I. . -\\\ . - N - \-...\ .-... . .. . ,. . ........"..... . \" . ) • .. , ! / SN.. \ I •'-"s N. / • ""•-• j *• - . " •N..:: . ...0 • •' . -. ,' / ' /. / / N. ../ / 7 i- • ! /. -y ' . .: N * N.. -, . - /./4--• •.4.- -- N1441.0-- N--- - %. \ \‘‘ \‘ ---, - - . - . 'N=2>,--1.---38.p ic -.\ - ' . .,•\\-1 : x 5:2/9 6/ .--2: ././71- (i--- 1/ //, ti-..-- 11/ -. . •-,--". -.'• '\40.,," i 7-04 -401:_#.NIF.:. ' .ii \-7\_,\.\-'6\;,\-- 11:,.\\6-'<" , .c-_'''s '' ' / -'- i ‘\ ,::,\ . / . / // - ..// I / " I I' ---fir -- - -- - . I • ---_,._....___ • . . .. : .1 . / / / ! I, ,, / ,_ '...../. . .,.. :\.• . ,, \.s, .\\4'i‘ %.\ \'N\\\ \- __ ---•.. \.. l'i.,N--.:, --'=,, . ...\\N /• '',.' . ,. ;‘,\\\N/ x 2535,2. . . ...: , •.,. :•• . 1.-:•-•:-.:... ..:.,.....:ii,.,..:1 . - -.'• • / • --7/ . - /-., ,------ i• V /ill ,. . -. - _,`.-- --. • Ilk '4f/A Iff-----77'' *.-: - - ' - - //° •./- ill- - /I i • ,////,///1- ',/-- t;21*/''I i L/ ,, -----" - -''' * - 411--'-ii - ‘*!1>fl"117.4 ;40f '..-- 7 •.., . . , , /_. /. .. . .• , , , , • .E3 K. . _ 1, . 1'4" / . 1// . %� ,y 2 /. /" % / • \. / \ \ • �. . :,,, 7, /. ; �/ �r / / / / / )7 fil.:4:4:7,:,1 • ;� ► -� \ i\ \---. - ---- _'.\\A '' �`�' �i 1�t"8 L`�"-- :i \ .� \• \ '/ 1 - ak :h g ,, . it.. ,.,.._ . fy -71- ---1---- '2 ' '-''' . ' ., , . . •, . \ . •._,---. - ...i . \ .,.,.. /N:.‘-',,,,„:2-\\q_-/- •••=z,....."(N4,00.,...1\" 11 - 'Is)----: ....--:„._.:-. , ; - ', .\\:: • _... ,.. ,„ ../„.... - - ---,Is- -_-.:-1-,,, \\ /.\. • . - /i A . :2\5\45--:,-3---- zi,,,- , / / . . . . .._ ..../4. , $.0. -., . __ ,_ / ,./ , , , ,), , • /2 /. /. , . • /. .. , • , . ,T • I.- ----..-_-_, -------f--,------\.--, N / -. ..\, -‘..\\,,k-„,p- =c--1/_. . i----:...-. .-.__.".._1 '-' _1 . \---,---- V..-- /,/,/./• ._ . - . ii ..-__Iii- ...-::-..- . , . ,.. el - k 1 • / //. 1 t 11070 / . 7.' _ . . • , ....__ . ., , . i , 4 ---------7 .- .. • , • ,• ,./• -r- ,-- 4-4,.. s... -N- \ / _ 0,,,,\ _____,._____ _ , -- ,,, . .,,. . ,: ., __ ._•_.. .1, -:..L , , _ _ .. ..: -- - . , .451 ___......._ __.____.. ___ :. - .• . . , „y/ _ , . . 0 /s , . . . .If 1 ,. , . . .., . i, / .., , • , ., 'a*-4 a4,-P• .. . ' /11 `''''' i .0.- / - i -. "( -/4.- A ---; ••• -• • .: _ :,-..., - 1 ,,../.• .. ,•,- 4,,..::::. • . . .,_____, NN 4,.‘,/, - .-. • /- - ' :.-Z-4 -/-1.,,(1 N ' - . / '/-i r • .- • - , - ' f_.,..-- ..• .,:- .,,,,..:.:•, .. .. '..: ..- *.=.-, :- .„-_-' .sfi / 'V .(Z''l -. / i-( ../1 V t P'‘3:--' . - ..__, . I< ;; . -'. .11 :..- - . -'11 -.•,-.-.)-5 -3 - - --- • -.. .4..• i/"X, \\., \ ‘ ‘-\\\\\\- N / ; .. . 2>.----_ -,c,----_,-,. __._•- _ „ ..i . .-. , . ... .:.••ii.,: • ..-,! .1 ._ .. ..,._ _ - //- i /- ,i\k/. .1 ..,// i. it' 4/ f ,,. _. , . AP • .•,--- .••••\,tii -(\ 2 .-• -. - ,/ . 4 •. -•-„‘ .... \ ‘Lf..., ,. ,\ / \ ., .- . / • .,) , ..) .• \\ v. *i\••• / 4.....------• •••. ..---",•• ' -".• --• - -,- .- . :-, . • 43 - • ...•e --,-,. -- / • , - s ,-. . ' /. i __, / /: „:•-• 6, / .. 1 --1 • ' • - 4 - .- ----t 4 • ., I' t mac. �t i \� / ,• ,. l / / /' ii�`� s• i- • /��``- .�,; +y r��` i' � '' -\.. `\\-.it '.1\-. \"/ / %..��([,J,�]• _ _J/ i t •�. - .■ w■ . ii ., ..., i . - , • .-/ • : . - • / , / ,- .- ii // ,-. .- - _ _•_---, , \ : \- f:::„."1, • 1. • et •'.::S- • • ------ 1 .. • - -- -... ,I.: -44, . " s .' t•••,\ %'• :\ -- f it'Y -, \ CO Pp."--- - --,--------1"--- • - ...-- - . ( i . -1 i')/ _ --•-- - / •-• •t0•14: // • /-- '' •-- -' '' \ \ • (k(Lai(4.17,..\l. .77.)- 1,1\1 .L".bail D()-. / ,::..•:-' .. / if ''' it 3.2 / :-/-/ I • , -, y . 4 *-- ,/.. .• - • ---- - : -..; - 1._ ;#4'J• / r- -\ i . „:.. . . ,• •, .4e.,,,,k,...:-„,. •• \ i - \''',:•;:\\ N`.\5ii ,,___ , .. ., ... x _,,s,70,, / ... , .1. ; ., , il / .. .., • ......-- . . " _ -, ...,.,„ , , . . .\•„ • _, 4.._ • „- . . •. ,....„ i . ,. . , . , . '• ' . ,' ..-,. • 1///.// - . . / . - k. ;• 1 I/ • . y V .. - -, --.,---- - 1 , .-- :..- k:._, • ..) . 'I//,/ . - 4'•, ...- i l , 'l , I/ '-Utik%411111,1-- r---- . . .!--F1-9215143.50' • / / _, . . .,_.- .• . . . .- - - ---....,_...,.N.:\Iii% .\;.:''.'\ \ \ \'‘. \ \ \ \ : .. / . / / 9 •' 1 ,, ,A1 I - ,--/,-." . "-'/ . . -' i.---.-. 4 'N -.'"......,,, ,-` ' ' ' -1W P SPACES ' �. i �,�'. • s ,\ \/ 3 ) ' i \ bliANDi('.AP SPA1tS i#i . 4 % . • • ( M1D i H. VAN SPACE ) .7''..'-''.':.:-:.'.,''..'..''-.I'':''..-.'-.''.'-::..''.-'..''.s..:'--.-:'-..:.sI-..',-:...'''_:.;.i._::_''.'....'•'."_..-...1-''l::.. . /I/ / ! 't / • /. i '`` . if, - �:' 1i �� , , - - ) ♦ l ) Q •i .-- ''-'-'-' /I ' ,f%_� ��/. j y f, j" 8'H wAT�� / �4• b• _ - ' ,; \ :1 ; ; , ' : �\,�" -2l Za�sPll s a ' -:. !///// \J/ ' ' . I,: '• / ��� - ' INT�6'ttl�COlgt STM+IF'ED�,1 i m • ./{. \l...i. ` i j i ��. GE iiiii Zszcs9°-1: / 5i/ I/ Y 111."� .111 f "4: s•;.;.:; ./ ;" f c'J o'" 1 1 - /. • : ; 1 j x�25 :.. .: ___-- . - /-•./ i i / s .-1 -.. _ i,i - -5 D.-- i -- . . _. / ,-. . /.. -///,,y.-..ir..-.- 1 ,--- / -. 9- - R-- ‘...„,..• -.• :.•-•. '�2122 .. - 4IcyIti �. _ ���_ •. e'�l � �/ /' �l (n -111: --A,:.- .-::":::: I • • i % 1 *� 1 ' • - ' :f. / ���• b t 1 ' �l% i / , 1 `' / _ ' /A. F X G'� �/ / i `" i ti� 44kif ...-`�. . ids ®` a '3�,�4 �/ / \ l Y�/ / ,' 1 / j , . 7 i.,/..;• .. -11/7/•. 14 .4 ., . 74, ,./....,.., . -,...,.:. I .. .' :'/ - " /. • ,,,,. , . . VII* i. :,/ //. N\... /_.../. ,. •./..i __,_ .• I / / -. .- 1' . . /.1 • . 1..- --',-/ tf--...--.--'• .....- - • ..- ori:ii ' • IN .1'. .4' /. .. . / - . /./.-- -.-/--/) . .---/'. .1 .1 %1/4- 144 - j 1 *' P° ..:,-,5 ..,... ./11_ . . . /_..._ . _ • - -, - •• ,,/ I % - 41. ...,.--. . ••.: 4. . .. --: •. _ -N - / /-it/fi t' -7 / / -v i- . - - 1.-:.1-P:''.:::--".:-. . - - . Li /..\.2 . .), / .. 1/: / // . / , ,---- - - . .-... .. _. /- ,...I... : . t •I I ./Ar ie i / / • . . .. . . . .- 77 .. ••'.'...///1. - .1 ' ,_/ I /VI 1 .'.• X ,• . -. • li- . .= I.- //1 • '-/ •., ‘• P../- ' . .i/ s_.Air j • . "(,>''.- k_ .. ,Z .- . , -7 4---'k-,6-.0;.......-4'•... i •••- . .4% . '- :.-cv-x..,./.)' ,!-..,..:,,.....- / • • .-/ i - :°- • A / /\. . 1 / ...N11 ' /// / i /. . \ . - 3 ' � ,` i \ , _ I. ; /5 / `:i �- i jam � l � ::5' ..: -'1. -'1.-•'-'..:.'•:...;..*,.:..-.'-',-.:'-:-..1...'1:.....::'":'..1:- ` :�\ ;! •" � :n! ` /. �� �'s /t/1 l .7 %11P . 7 ;;/ ://i. -* '• [. -'../ 't • . • • ': ,/ .,_ , i _ ..,-- • .- - , _ . : . _.- . • _ • . . .. , . .. • ._ .- . --... r ,.0--4- 11. - ...•-• • • _. . / • ..., -. - - \_,- • 1- .- \ -. / I 1./-/ i •I 11/ .I I ..1 I I / / \ ./\ •• _/ ELCONQUISTADOR 7115-7R NOTE: This is an original unpublished drawing created by DRAWING # / FILE NAME WORK ORDER NO. Addisigns Inc. It is submitted for your personal use in JOB NAME ELCONQUISTADOR EXECUTIVE PLAZA PHONE connection with a proposed project being planned for you by PERMIT COPYAddisigns Inc. It is not to be shown to anyone outside your JOB ADDRESS 10195 N. ORACLE PLAZA CATALINA, AZ SUITF ZIP 85737 organization, nor is it to be reproduced, copied. TYPE OF SIGN(S) 2) SETS RPC/FC0 NON-ILLUM. ONTO 2)EXISTING F/S WALLS photographed,written exhibited l used in any fashion without the expressed written approval of Addisigns Inc. DATE REVISIONS 7-17-00 ESTIMATE NO. INSTALL DATE PAGE OF FA6RICATE AND INSTALL ONE (1) SET OF FLAT CUT OUT LETTERS NON-ILLUMINATED AND FLAT CUT OUT SECONDARY COPY AS PER DRAWING. "EL CONQUISTADOR EXECUTIVE PLAZA" LETTERS TO 6E STUD MOUNTED 1/2" OFF SURFACE "10195 N. ORACLE RD." LETTERS TO 6E 10 MM SINTRA PAINTED COPPER WITH TURQUOISE PATINA FINISH "ARROW" TO 6E 10MM SINTRA PAINTED COPPER WITH TURQUOISE PATINA FINISH ENTRANCE TO 6E CUT OUT OF VINYL LETTERS TO 6E STUD MOUNTED 1/2" OFF SURFACE LETTERS TO 6E INSTALLED ON ON TO EXISTING CURVED WALL INSTALL TWO(2) GROUND"UP" LIGHTING UNITS IN FRONT OF WALL. -- ------___ RUN POWER TO "J" 60X IN GROUND FOR ELECTRIC. El Conquistador 4. Executive Plaza ENTRANCE 10195 N. Rd • CI1CJ . . CJI/igfl/ PRIMARY CIRCUIT PROBLEMS YES 0 NO D CUSTOMER NOTIFIED YES D NO 0 SIGN ENERGIZED YES D NO D PERMIT DROPPED OFF YES D NO p NOTES: INC. 3808 E. 38TH STREET/TUCSON, ARIZONA 85713 (520) 748- 1540 DATE ACCEPTED BUYER SIGNATURE ADDISIGNS SIGNATURE ovi 0 .00 ...1 6 _.....,_, ,, ___..... , _..... �' a ,R,soh v y�ray 1 _ ival 41, iii„,,40 . 1„,_ kil ' ' ' . —______ 00#04,1 „ft...14r* N 111 73;>--- (.7 • - -- 44,, -- ' -------, 1 --0.'', . 4 r in -aiz ilcff -- '—a11lif9omrr_k 4 : :. -�`�1►� �. ,,. - --CZICD.Q A. ooked IC Di Mil I- _� t'``��"`„' I OroVaiIey 1(I I LlLll___..__: _"I��III sa rags ------- � —� _--------------- c. , _ - C / .� I --- Parcels • D. r7,--- ri.Doh VON. � IT_ `�`_ I\ N J . __ 4 AIW E 0.3 0 0.3 0.6 Miles S Sec. 12-502 SIGNS 9. Illumination: Internal (provided only characters emit light, or pan channel), or a combination thereof(See Sec. 12-402, Lighting and Movement). B. Shopping Center(Commercial Complex) Entry-Way Sign 1. Description: Signs which identify, by name and address, the entrance to any shopping center or commercial development ten (10) acres or greater in size. Names of anchor tenants may also appear,within the permitted sign area. 2. Location: The sign shall be located at the main entrance of the center and shall be so placed as not to interfere with traffic in anyway, or to present a traffic hazard. 3. Landscaping: The sign shall be placed in a landscaped setting either on the ground or in raised planters constructed as an integral part of the sign structure. Said landscape treatment shall extend three (3) feet from the sign base on all sides, if double-faced. For single-faced signs, the landscape treatment must extend a minimum of three(3)feet in front, and to sides, of the sign structure. 4. Setbacks: Five(5)foot minimum from property line. 5. Area of sign: Fifty (50)square feet maximum. 6. Height: Six(6)feet above grade. 7. Quantity: Each commercial complex shall be permitted one sign per street frontage., to be located at the main entrance into the center. If any one street fr`onta'ge ex ee-ds 1,500 feet in lineal dimension, a second sign on that frontage may be permitted, for a maximum of three (3)such signs per complex. 8. Form: freestanding, monolith-type, may be double-faced. An entry-way sign shall contain the name of the commercial complex and a maximum of four anchor tenants. 9. Illumination: Direct, internal, provided only characters emit light, halo-illumination, or a combination thereof(See Sec. 12-402, Lighting and Movement). C. Freestanding Business Entry-Way Sign 1. Description: Signs which identify, by name, the entrance to a single, freestanding business and churches. Not associated with a commercial complex by ownership or access points. Said signs shall be so placed as to not interfere with traffic in any way, or to present a traffic hazard. Churches and theaters may have change panels on their signs. 2. Location: The sign shall be located at the main entrance to the business. 3. Landscaping: The sign shall be placed in a landscaped setting, either on the ground or in raised planters constructed as an integral part of the sign structure. Said landscape treatment must extend three (3) feet from the sign base on all sides, if double-faced. For single-faced signs, the landscape treatment must extend a minimum of three (3) feet from the base of the sign face and three(3)feet on each end. Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised (Rev 6/99) 12 - 14 AGENDA ORO VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT January 23, 2001 Oro Valley Town Hall Council Chambers 11,000 N. La Canada Drive CALL TO ORDER: 3:00 p.m. ROLL CALL MINUTES Approval of minutes from November 28, 2000 hearing AT THE CALL OF THE CHAIR,THE AGENDA ITEMS MAY BE TAKEN IN ANY ORDER,AS DEEMED APPROPRIATE. EACH PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS AFTERNOON'S AGENDA WILL BE CONDUCTED IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER: STAFF REPORT PETITIONER/APPLICANT PRESENTATION PUBLIC INPUT PETITIONER/APPLICANT RESPONSE AND SUMMATION PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. OV-10-00-16 ADDISIGNS INC. FOR LEXIMAR LLC. OF EL CONQUISTADOR EXECUTIVE PLAZA REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO REMOVE THE EXISTING ENTRYWAY SIGN, LOCATED ON GREENOCK DRIVE AND REPLACE IT WITH A SIMILAR SIGN TO BE PLACED ON THE WALL FACING ORACLE ROAD ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EL CONQUISTADOR EXECUTIVE PLAZA PROPERTY. SUBJECT PROPERTY: 10195 N. ORACLE ROAD, ORO VALLEY, AZ 85737. PLANNING AND ZONING UPDATE ADJOURNMENT A packet of agenda materials, as listed above, is available for public inspection at least 24 hours prior to the BOA meeting in the Town Hall Administration Building,during regular business hours. The Town of Oro Valley complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If a disabled person planning to attend this meeting requires any special accommodations, please notify the Town Clerk at 229-4742. NOTICE TO SPEAKERS Members of the public have the right to speak during any posted public hearing; however,those items not listed as a public hearing are for consideration and action by the Board during the course of its business meeting. Members of the public may be allowed to speak on these topics at the discretion of the Chair. If you wish to address the Board on any item(s) on this agenda, please complete a speaker card located on the Agenda table at the back of the room and give it to the Clerk of the Board. Please indicate on the speaker card which item number and topic you wish to speak on. Please step forward to the podium when the Chair announces the item(s) on the agenda,which you are interested in addressing. Posted: LH Date: 01/17/2001 Time:4:00 January 18, 2001 Oro Valley Board of Adjustment Oro Valley Town Hall 11000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley, Arizona Ref El Conquistador Executive Plaza Dear sirs: I am a resident of the Oro Valley Townhomes. My house is just west of the El Conquistador Executive Plaza. I just wanted to let you know that I fully support their request to relocate the entry sign to the northwest corner of Oracle Road and Greenock. It is my opinion that having the sign there, WITH AN ARROW, will help direct the traffic to the south entrance rather than the Greenock entrance to the building. Sincerely, rat, . Laurie Stark �`�������puwm Sig`ek�Y'.._11�Ia c y 23, 2001 J = ! :AI, • otary \ Co iss16, Sep 8 ,AA 2 ��'��ky OMM�,40 DRAFT MINUTES BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT JANUARY 23,2001 11,000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE ORO VALLEY,ARIZONA CALL TO ORDER at 3:05 p.m. PRESENT: Henry Suozzi, Chairman Bill Adler, Vice Chairman James Swan, Member Cindy Lewis, Member ABSENT Lyra Done, Member STAFF: Dan Dudley, Town Attorney Bryant Nodine, Planning and Zoning Administrator Dee Widero, Senior Zoning Inspector Debbie Moran, Zoning Tech. Linda Hersha, Secretary II APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE NOVEMBER 28, 2000 HEARING AND STUDY SESSION MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 19,2000 MOTION: Chairman Suozzi MOVED to CONTINUE the minutes of the Special Session to the next Study Session scheduled for Friday, January 26, 2001 with the corrections noted. Motion SECONDED by Member Swan. Motion carried, 4-0. MOTION: Member Swan MOVED to APPROVE the minutes of November 28, 2000 with the corrections noted. Member Lewis SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 4-0. 1. OV-10-00-16 ADDISIGNS INC. FOR LEXIMAR LLC. OF EL CONQUISTADOR EXECUTIVE PLAZA REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO REMOVE THE EXISTING ENTRYWAY SIGN, LOCATED ON GREENOCK DRIVE,AND REPLACE IT WITH A SIMILAR SIGN TO BE PLACED ON THE WALL FACING ORACLE ROAD ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EL CONQUISTADOR EXECUTIVE PLAZA PROPERTY. SUBJECT PROPERTY: 10195 NORTH ORACLE ROAD, ORO VALLEY, AZ 85737 Dee Widero, Senior Zoning Inspector, reviewed the staff report. She explained that Addisigns Inc. was requesting that El Conquistador Plaza be allowed to relocate one • 1/23/01 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 2 MINUTES existing entryway sign. She reported that the proposed sign would look similar to the existing sign, but would aid the traffic flow to the south entrance rather than down Greenock Road. She explained that the owner feels that removing the existing entryway sign from Greenock Drive and relocating one at the corner of Greenock Drive and Oracle Road, would greatly improve the safety for the surrounding residential community by reducing the flow of traffic on Greenock Drive. She explained that the Zoning Code (OVZCR Sec. 12.502.B.7) allows only one sign per street frontage. Section 12-502.B.4 of the Zoning Code states that a setback should be a minimum of 5' from property line. The existing wall is only 1.8" from property the line. Ms. Widero reported that all property owners within 300 feet of this property have been notified of the hearing and the property has been posted with a Notice of Hearing. The Notice of Hearing has been advertised in the Daily Territorial Newspaper. She reported that staff had received a letter from Laurie Starr, a resident living in the Oro Valley Townhoines, that was in favor of the signage relocation. Ms. Widero reported that the right-of-way width of Oracle Road in the area is 300 feet. She explained that from the centerline of Oracle Road to the existing south entrance is approximately 190 feet; The entry sign currently located in the area sits approximately 156 feet from the centerline of Oracle Road. She said that the proposed sign would sit approximately 153 feet from the centerline of Oracle Road. The applicant is proposing to relocate the existing entryway sign on Greenock Drive and placing the entryway sign with an arrow directing to the south entrance of the corner of Greenock Drive and Oracle Road. She said that this would direct the access onto El Conquistador Executive Plaza property at the south entrance off of Oracle Road, north next to the Clare Bridge facility. The following finding of facts exist: • Because the topography is below level grade, special conditions do exist • The owner or applicant did not create the condition • Granting the variance would allow the general public to enter the offices more safely • A variance to increase the height of Clare Bridge sign (next to the property to the south) was granted in 1999 • The adjustment would not constitute special privileges inconsistent with the limitation on other properties in the vicinity • The authorizing of the variance would not be materially detrimental to the people residing in the vicinity, to the adjacent property, to the neighborhood or to the public welfare in general In conclusion, she explained that by granting the variance, it would help direct traffic from the residential neighborhood. Vice Chairman Adler stated that the Code indicates there should only be one sign per frontage road. He explained that if the current sign were relocated from Greenock Drive to the proposed corner, it would be on Oracle Road as well as the main entry sign. This would place two signs on Oracle Road making it a violation of the Zoning Code. 1/23/01 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 3 MINUTES Member Swan asked if the remaining sign was fronting Greenock Road or Oracle Road. Ms. Widero explained that the current sign was facing Oracle Road. Member Lewis asked in which direction would the proposed sign face. Ms. Widero replied, "I believe it will be facing more to the north". Chairman Suozzi swore in the witness that was intending to testify. Mark Hanes, representing Addisgins Inc., explained that the company was not interested in producing another sign; increasing the square footage or exposure, but to re-locate the exact style of sign on Greenock Drive closer to Oracle Road. He explained that the location of the sign would specifically be used for directing traffic. He proceeded to distribute and review 10 photographs reflecting the different vantagepoints of the current sign located the on site. In conclusion, he stated that the true intent was the safety of the community. Vice Chairman Adler explained that signs are specifically used to provide proper identification, and as far as getting information to the public relating to the business, it would be considered an advertising issue. He said that the request for variance in his opinion had nothing to do with traffic, but perceived the variance request as an attempt to improve advertising. Mr. Hanes explained that the company's goal was not to gain exposure, but taking responsibility and overseeing community safety. Chairman Suozzi suggested the applicant place a sign on the building located on Oracle Road to make it more visible. Mr. Hanes explained that the company had taken the idea into consideration, but there were limitations with the square footage and maintaining the Code requirements. He added that a sign could be placed on the building, but because of the Zoning Code, limitations would forfeit any potential exposure to the tenant. Member Lewis stated that relocating the sign was not going to make much of a difference. She suggested repositioning and changing the orientation of the sign located on Oracle Road by making it double-sided. Member Swan asked if the proposed new location would be fronting on Greenock Drive or Oracle Road. Mr. Hanes replied, "clearly on Greenock". 1/23/01 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 4 MINUTES Member Swan reference a section of the staff report that referenced a section of the Zoning Code (Sec. 12.502.B.7) which allowed only one sign per street frontage. He asked if the Board was addressing a variance for more than one sign on a thoroughfare. Ms. Widero stated that she felt that the Board could address the issue, but that the applicant had clearly stated that he was not interested in addressing the issue at this time in their request for a variance. Member Swan asked if the Board was clear to the fact that the applicant was not asking for or needed a variance, as it relates to two signs being placed on the same frontage road. Vice Chairman Adler stated that he was unclear and explained that the map clearly reflects that the purpose ur of the sign on Greenock Road and Oracle Road would be to P P direct the public to the entrance on Oracle Road. Member Swan asked if the proposed sign location was within the Greenock Drive right- of-way or the Oracle Road right-of-way. Ms. Widero replied, "both". She explained that the way the applicant has presented their case on the map, it appeared that there would be two signs positioned on Oracle Road. Member Swan stated that the site plan was not as detailed as it should have been and that he had difficulty determining where Oracle Road was exactly located on the map. He said, "the Board needs to determine whether or not the request for variance would be for two signs on the same frontage." Chairman Suozzi agreed. Member Swan referenced the Zoning Code (Sec-502.B.4)that indicates that the setback should be a minimum of 5 feet form the property line. He asked if the wall was violating any existing encroachment at the present time. Ms. Widero replied, "no". Member Swan reference photograph number#1 (the photo reflects a bush in front of the sign located on Oracle Road) and suggested that the applicant remove the bush. He asked if the bush was on the applicant's property. Mr. Hanes informed the Board that the property owner of the El Conquistador complex was present to answer any questions the Board may have regarding the site. Chairman Suozzi opened the Public Hearing Migal Gadea, 10195 North Oracle Road, Suite 101, clarified that the bushes were on the neighboring property. He added that if it were possible, he would remove the bush located in front of the sign on Oracle Road. 1/23/01 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 5 MINUTES Member Swan suggested that the applicant speak with the neighbors regarding the possibility of removing the bush. Chairman Suozzi closed the Public Hearing. Member Swan asked for confirmation that the Board was only addressing the variance for the setback. Ms. Widero explained that when the report was written, she felt that the applicant was asking for a variance for the setback and for two signs off of Oracle Road rather than one. Member Swan asked if there was language in the applicant's request for variance addressing both issues. Ms. Widero replied, "no, they didn't actually address the setback issue". She added that the applicant had simply asked to relocate the sign located on Greenock Drive. Member Swan stated the Board should address what was applicable. He asked if both issues were applicable. Ms. Widero replied, "yes". Craig Civalier, Development Review Division Manager, explained that the sign currently sits on a curb, leaving one side of the sign facing Oracle Road and the other side facing Greenock Drive. Vice Chairman Adler explained that the applicant's intent in requesting the variance would be to help people traveling along Oracle Road to get to the main entrance. He said that in his opinion, a portion of the request was for two signs on the same frontage. Member Swan agreed. MOTION: Vice Chairman Adler MOVED to DENY Case No. OV 10-00-16, finding that the special conditions on the property allow adequate identification without a variance, and that the preservation of substantial property rights are preserved. Motion SECONDED by Member Swan. ROLL CALL VOTE Chairman Suozzi - Aye Vice Chairman Adler—Aye Member Lewis—Aye Member Swan—Aye Motion carried to DENY the request for variance regarding Case NO. OV 10-00-16, 4-0. 1/23/01 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 6 MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING UPDATE Craig Civalier, Development Review Division Manager, reported the following: • Staff is currently reviewing the Ritz Carlton Development Plan located in Stone Canyon • Staff is also reviewing the Development Plan for Stone Canyon 6, which is adjacent to the Ritz Carlton Development • Staff is working on the rezoning of two commercial properties located on Oracle Road and Hardy Road Dan Dudley, Town Attorney reported that staff was expecting a decision form the Court of Appeals regarding the Tortilita and Cases Adobes Case within the next 20 days. Chairman Suozzi announced that the next Study Session meeting was scheduled for January 26, 2001 at 2:00 p.m. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Vice Chairman Adler MOVED to ADJOURN the meeting at 4:31 p.m. Motion SECONDED by Member Swan. Respectfully submitted, Lind Hersha, Secretary II AGENDA ORO VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT INFORMATION AND ORIENTATION MEETING STUDY SESSION JANUARY 26, 2001 - 2:00 p.m. Oro Valley Town Hall Council Chambers 11,000 N. La Canada Drive CALL TO ORDER: 2:00 p.m. ROLL CALL AT THE CALL OF THE CHAIR,THE AGENDA ITEMS MAY BE TAKEN IN ANY ORDER,AS DEEMED APPROPRIATE. 1. BOARD RULES (if any), SELECTION OF MEMBERS, BOARD COMPOSITION, ETC. 2. CLARIFY" CONFLICT OF INTEREST" ISSUES AND CIRCUMSGANCES 3. SUGGESTIONS ON HOW TO BE FAIR, OBJECTIVE, IMPARTICAL AND AN ACTIVE MEMBER 4. RELATIONSHIP OF THIS BOARD WITH OTHER BOARDS (P&Z, DRB, ETC), ESPECIALLY WHEN RELATED ITEM ARE INVOLVED 5. CLARIFY HOW RECOMMENDATION(S), DECISION(S), CONDITON(S) ARE COMMUNICATED WITH OTHER BOARDS, STAFF,TOWN COUNCIL 6. OTHER QUESTIONS, CONCERNS, ETC. ADJOURNMENT Posted: LH Date: 01/17/2001 Time:4:00