Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOV100604 May 1, 2006 Meeting with Dee, Patty and Thomas Spevak The following items were asked to be clarified: Application- nature of request: Elaborate on request, explain 6% slope measurements Question 1: Explain 6% slope Explain cloud on sheet 3. Clarify if the request is for 1'6" or 2'. Applicant indicated reducing the height would require a redesign of trusses. Location of house constricted by setbacks and floodplain Site plan: Highlight floodplain Bubble/define area exceeding height Enlarge site plan May 1, 2006 Phone call with Mr. Spevak and Patty. Patty suggested he include the conservation and slope easements in report. Also the walls in the eastern conservation easement will have to be removed. Patty gave Mr. Spevak until May 11`h to submit new plans due to the fact the person who did the site plan is an vacation. \ `_ ----- Sedona Ride Place ��. 17 INV,=2852,57 (Pubtic)-- v PAVING/GRADI \ ' ''IDGE II SHE T/g 0 12 AS BUIL \� �FLOODPLAIN LIMIT , 3Ar,' / 1 .:\ DRAINAGE EASEMENT \� BACK —('-' \ -- __ Z3f� ` I'/-,//1-144"1: :::::: 10'P'D. / 5 l Top of W.I.Raiff B3C) : j S� Top of Ret�nlhg Wall 282s.08 ill � i 1 ; 28.5. 4ID - 3 s t i� �-:i ' 44, Za,) L 0: ' ' i\ , T i , �� ' ! �28,5.. :1,, 42`0 TOW=L‘.� 2 21 r r � / ISTEP ; ,,o `— --1 ___ _ 7 , ♦f��r�~ 32.1 32Top of W.�.Rail 2832.5 / * '/� �i► 5.0 /...%4,443,4434,,.... �,, jTop ofRpof W = Fg aU-2829.0 ti10 41/ • = 6 : t -- Top of W.I.Rail=2833.5 /, �`�;' o 28. "/Top of Retaining Wall=2838 029. 3 9 FFE-•829,33 �$ ' FP p,1�2828 , �� / VETBAC �I . - 'Top of Retaining-Walk2829.0 I 29.5:: . --4 -/il � , " /' CP \"1-Q 2 9.t P '.1*,,724', - i /I' • 4 - - NI 1 yo Nd 32. O • / co 1GRADING LIMITS 3 ' 2 ,pb` d; AND SILT FENCE 29.5 s!!:O33 `� / __ \� o '• '/.1b%Slope �tE= 2a5o ';1=F ,r �Z 15'SIDE ; ,,r` 0 32. SETBACK' , ■ 29.57 "1 re g i Of 4/ • - --- ,(ri- 4b, _ //4 - -_- Siii 41''Y c r , 1 •/Top of W.I..Rail=2 3,5 1.5%Slop: % �servation Ease ! -- Easement J - 3 6 47 , 2 ti , l �``� "' 32. - r r ! ! Top of Retain Wall- 2•' i►}9 - 4.00 32.2 2. f - Peta Wing. ,28 0 :� T°p of i / j 4 T Wall-38.00 / C w� ' 67 \ N9,1 !' • . ® �� PA=35.75 ors _ b.... x �� En- �of Back Retaining=+g■ 30'BACK 11 GRADING LIMITSfrom - >f SETBACK Co natural grade, l (,� �t \\ 1 /Conservation Easement 1 ; \ M CR N/ CO , Nig, •�1 6+s i i M o 'S2"E — —' '139.69'N89°46 ,aa 3-FLY BULT-LP ROOF ON COIGRETE TIE ON 1-•40 TOP OF GAMEY TO BE 7-0'ABOVE ANY ROOF . I/1'SIEATNINS NAILED OVER FELT ON IP%SHEATHNN6 VALID hUTNN KY-0'I 9-0'ABOVE TIE NIEFEST POWT OF FRAH*G R 3O HA T.I FRANN6 R-0 BATT'ill AH TRU55E5 __--- PENETRATIOII PER FO ZOCB,SECT.RG101b. CONCRETE ME ON I-40 NS FLAW W R-30 B•.iT.NSU.ATION SiW R-90 EATT R6ULAnOM PELT OVER �� EO NAILED TRUSSES 0 TO.PAR/8ET HOW • _ _ _ ,_ - - MI R�90 B.ATT INSULATION?84683 •"`- •`•-,-•'�-•-'--�'-- TD.PARAPET IIS'-6' O __,-- ,-�. y.,- . s-1• 25460 r O T.O.PARAPET 114'-6' ���T _-w• ..s.-.�'',w`�_` •..�.,_ a-..e.- 3.-r�111.►I/Il(Ill1lla�1111:.r 2644D3 TO.PLATE"3'4 r_:r:•,E.�.•.•.•..-•u.•:•�:ii•.•:•Z•. �o �'I�iy��l'� IN_ 'Ir�.IY•�Is� TO.PARAPET 113'-0' 1843.99 PREFAB 4.ONC. PREFAB CONC. .--- r4'-- •d-_ TO.PARAPET 111'-0' )-( 3D4ZS3 �� IZ �- _ � �TOP OF AROH II'-0' �'--- ---� • `l TRM t KE1'STOIE TRIM/KEYSTONE lj*! T..�-1j a:�''�6i_� �t o_. NS LIE T-0' 911'1111911•S�.A�-TD.PLATE 110,W _ l = ._ /"1Q DOORS UO.6' • I >� 1D'3633 'r•"'" �� t' ST04E AMER IZ 1D401d _"" �_ :I TD.hEN001•15•; •� r•1 F.1 111d 11 1 1'�j� - _ T.D.PLATE 106 0' O 1356.53 /// AA ill kih Ilk Ahl -' 1 Cr T 1L3T35 O \ WTRM i O TD.BASE 104'-6'163433 ��o- r��o��o e 4 // FEE.107fi. _'� �. -�;o=-�.o�_ .i�Es-.es31 • O PIE.18S� 1R - - - �� -'_=_ 9 •STONE VENEER i a • T. BASE Nr'-O' O EJ(5TIN5 6RADE�-- FEE.lar-o'�,so ---, asp'=_el�i fj9fadrsis.i.tRs 235lx II '�_ �_ �_ O FIE.Z83033 : pie- �S���t�7C�i - • FFE 44'-0 fA800014Ei -- --.. -'fie-F _ Ei •p-Y �r,, PPE 16p33 O __ STONE VENEER 1616 ZT T EXISTLI6 GRADE O YD.PARAPET II6'-0' •1.�-. ..�.-. .milTD PARAPET PARAFCT IW'-6' 1D4628 1D46Dj • TO PARAPET 114'{r'O ZD44OS O TO.PARAPET 113'-0' 294393 •LT"^-'r PRE-FAB IDONE.'................---"-TRII4 O T.O.WHlD0145 R0,6' \ �O • 70.E IIO'-0'0 $KCYSTONE _ \ _ // // // _ -- 36 '6~ TO.BAI 104'-6' O -s-- + _ • PPE 102,12' E715TiN66RADE� - ,4 -� _--�'� m= • PPE.2532b3 0 91. 31 31 STORE VENEER EXISTING GRADE TOP OF CHIMNEY TO BE 7-0'ABOVE ANY ROOF WHIN0-0'1 3-0'ABP/E THE NI6VEST POINT OF 9-FLY BIALT-LP ROOF ON FRA . FRA ER PQETRATIOIR PER IRO ZOOS.SOT.RIOOIb. FRI SIFATHR- NAILED 01 1lN9 ream.tPE(PERMIIB PLA 1 W R-90 BATT.MSLLATION UNO. O TO.PARAPET 13'-0' • I ... • TO.PARAPET 116'-6' O 1 1646D 1 r r 646bS TOP OF ARCH 10'-O- TO.PARAPET O WRNS L OC 4',0' ]64WD O TO.PARAPET 113'-0' . T7.Hamm 11'-6• O 2641 3642.69 ONE-COAT STUCCO SYSTEM 0 7D.MOONS IIO'-0' • // // TO 1c4 IIO' O ON WRE LATH ON 3 LAYERS GRADE TI.PAPER ON{/ // // RIBD R61A.BD. 1' ID TD.DODRS 10V-0' • / OVER 2 a 5TW5•We OD. !'1 T D.DOORS IOT 0''-4 JJ 7tr3b33 // �/ // / �/ /� '- T W Ra'1'GATT.Rl'All `J . . UND.SEE SFEA R NALL LION- H E'BO 203-1.33 // // -- '� -- 1�-�-r/-1 _____ /// - FIRHIAC. // ........ 3,4............... - �!• I t _J© EX15TM6 GRADE/ //! %-�•' , _ PPE IOY-0' 0 / • P1L781709 r -f-/ �` -- PPE GV'-0' _ •'~_- �- O PFP44'-0' � 'SC---- REAR •---ri-� 24 E/ `R ittt EXIST146 GRADE Z63 CONG ETE 7LE ON 1-440 FELT ON I12'SNEATHRK NAILED OVER FRE-ENGINEERID 1141.5SES W R30 BATE RGU.ATKA4 Tn DeD wDLT .c c• ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT REPORT CASE NO: OV 10-06-04 Hearing Date: May 23, 2006 Agenda Item No.: 1 Prepared By: Patty Hayes,Zoning Inspector REQUEST: OV10-06-04 Sonoran Design Group representing Mike and Linda Arnold, request a variance from the 18' building height, up to 20', when measured from natural grade on a custom graded lot with a greater than 6% slope. Subject property: (parcel #219-50-0300) located at 721 W. Sedona Ridge, Oro Valley, AZ, 85737. REQUEST SPECIFICS: Sonoran Design Group representing Mike and Linda Arnold, is requesting approval to build a house on a custom graded lot with a greater than 6% slope. Building height is measured from natural grade on lots with a slope greater than 6%. The proposed house has a parapet wall that is 15'8" in height on a 10" foundation, with up to 3.5' of fill underneath the area in question. The 15'8" of building, 10" of foundation, plus the 3.5' of fill exceeds the allowable building height of 18' by 2', because the natural grade at certain points of the building is significantly lower than that of other parts of the building site. The amount of fill dirt accounts for a portion of the allowable building height. OVZCR Definition #60. Building Height(Sloped Area) Shall mean the maximum vertical distance measured from natural grade to the highest point of the building directly above, excluding any chimney. This definition applies only to a building footprint where the natural cross-slope is six (6) percent or more. if---- - ' tikAX!Nlym BUILDING HEIGHT NNJ 107-414,-, ,i,..., ....1 , air gym, EXISTING a... 6, � NI P lj■L `fix' . 'M.F' FELL SITE LOCATION: This site is located in the Sunridge II subdivision. Sedona Ridge Place is located west of Piping Rock Road, south of Moore Road. NOTIFICATION: All property owners within 300 feet of this property were notified by mailing of this hearing. The property is posted with a notice of hearing and the hearing was advertised in the Daily Territorial. At the time of this report preparation, staff had not received any public comment in support or opposition to the request. EXISTING LAND USE AND ZONING: On-site Vacant land-zoned R1-20 North: Vistoso Ridge—zoned R1-10 South: Coyote Ridge—zoned R1-36 East: Rancho Vistoso NH 7 Parcel A—zoned PAD West: Moonridge—zoned R1-20 SITE ANALYSIS: Sunridge II is a 65-lot subdivision, recorded in Oro Valley in 1995, zoned R1-20. Subject property is a 29,215 square foot; square shaped lot. The lot has a floodplain to the west, conservation easements on the south and east and a slope easement on the north. SUMMARY: Staff finding of facts: • Lot 22 has a 12% slope under the house pad. • The building area of lot 22 is restricted by slope, conservation and floodplain easements on all sides. Driveways are allowed in the slope easement and screen walls allowed only with home owner's association approval. • The building walls, including parapet, vary from 12' to 16'6" in height. • The section of house in question is 15'8" from finished floor, 16'5" from finished grade, but exceeds the 18' from natural grade. • The applicant states the building has been redesigned so as to minimize parapet elevations. And, that the structural components and approved design prevents further lowering of the parapet. 2 The Board of Adjustment should consider the following findings in making its decision: A. That there are special circumstances or conditions applying to the property referred to in the application including its size, shape, topography, location or surroundings which do not apply to other properties in the district; and B. That special circumstances were not created by the owner or applicant; and C. That the authorizing of the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights; and D. That any variance granted imposes such conditions as will assure that the authorizing of the adjustment shall not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which such property is located; and E. That the authorizing of the variance will not be materially detrimental to persons residing in the vicinity, to adjacent property, to the neighborhood or the public welfare in general. SUGGESTED MOTION: The Board may wish to consider the following motions: I move to [approve, approve with conditions, or deny] OV 10-06-04, a request to exceed the 18' building height up to 2' when measuring building height from existing grade on a greater than 6% slope. ATTACHMENTS: 1. BOA application 2. Location map 3. Ariel Photo 4. Site plan 5. Plat map F:\Ov\Ov 10\2006\10-06-04\REPORT.doc r S ah More, AI Planning and Zoning Administrator 3 1 M �1.EY 46,1e 0 o O� 9 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY . , PLANNING& ZONING DIVISION � ► ' 11,000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE,ORO VALLEY AZ 85737 A •• �_, .� Phone: (520)229-4800 Fax: (520)742-1022 -%Nom'91' MAY 0 g 2006 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION FOR: Zoning Variance Note: Submittals are due by noon -Zoning Interpretation , A- ppeal of Administrative Decision CASE NO.: NATURE OF REQUEST: VkiglA7ACE lt\ ,g "TD kg c5if;r-C 4-TEtloLAT lt,1\*'\" . (,cigot-k \\is.c-1".t)R At- (cAz,m)-e.) 17ietizki-v -j- R 1 4 Ck--T- ( A) ELkl i aLfD FLL oC C 1AiiO _,(j-W ( --+. Foor 14A-\. --fZ d'Ar-QAbo3o,rc i5 t \e ,'1,et)_. APPLICANT: 64rtSo "17 4 &t�t Cfl-.ova - -CoM ' IL PHONE: 26k 3 -2-�-15 FAX: 29 . 2-44ct ADDRESS: v tJ , a7--P�LE. j , OWNER: UAt DA, NO 1) f\A t k Ar0Lit7 ADDRESS: /2-1 A . �G- a1 P, 'gl17 & 1 oc2 v 'l A t—e PROPERTY LOCATION FOR VARIANCE REQUEST: PARCEL#: 2 61 -5 0 O3 UO LEGAL DESCRIPTION: &Y\n a e - UT1 i1 CURRENT ZONING: I. - APPLICABLE FEE: ATTACHMENTS: 6 t` 1LA tJ - F Ply R P[-A-( - .t. VAS ID 1\ SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT (ALSO PRINT NA.vE) DATE 7i/(‘Z - 4//ti5 Si?0,6filK 4(.-2-4'° ‘ cSnr7/e. &S.(6A/ 6/ern: , ti PARCEL#: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: CURRENT ZONING: APPLICABLE FEE: ATTACHMENTS: SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT (ALSO PRINT NAME) DATE SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONS FOR APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE Please provide the following information addressing 1 — 5 in the Findings from Section 21.6 I of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised (OVZCR). In order to authorize a variance request, the Board will be searching for sufficient evidence in accordance with the findings. 1. Are there special circumstances or conditions applying to the property referred to in the application including its size, shape, topography, location or surroundings which do not apply to other properties in the district? - a 12) CV *gaP-a4'D trkarvkiis- +►kef\‘‘ ?Neh-OF f 151-S" l a u3 �Pvr k$` f fay 1.1ketiremi fob VQQ2. A 6AAMAi 1)012-rinN) One d&ry t . 2. Are there special circumstances that exist that are not self imposed or created by the owner/applicant? C ooves2Jfric b t� �.0 N1& qOe,) t,t6 3. Is the authorizing of the variance necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights? If alb. To &12,Nt41 q A .1tA c 4 ookveo t l c T '�ve- P-13* -Tv 60 tbDt (SrtotJ 4. If granted, will the variance impose such conditions as will assure that the authorizing of the adjustment shall not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which such property is located? 1 "CO 5. If granted, will the variance be the minimum necessary to afford relief and will not materially affect the health, safety, and welfare of the neighborhood or surrounding f properties. 6 1-4-rs, Prey W iA t�v� t h� c7WW R `) VW, E NV"/tz- P .A-7e E �i, Tic , , A.c .p 6t,1 5 E 42 -D moors 9 -rs Fovvtaretz uniob,RAFIta - ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: 15 copies of 1 lx17 dimensioned plot plan, if applicable 15 copies of 1 lx17 dimensioned floor plan, if applicable 15 copies of 11x17 building elevations, if applicable Provide an estimate of the incremental cost of the change in, or additions to, the property, such estimated cost to be endorsed as accurate by a licensed contractor or engineer. Any additional comments/information you wish to provide regarding your request. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION FEES TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 11000 N.LA CANADA DRIVE ORO VALLEY,AZ 85737 PHONE: 229-4800 FAX: 742-1022 RECEIPT ****************************************************************************** REFERENCE NUMBER: OV1006-04 RECEIPT #06P00181 SITE ADDRESS: 721 W SEDONA RIDGE PL OV TAXCODE: 219-50-0300 DATE: 04/25/2006 TIME: 03:14 PM COMP TYPE: BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT TYPE: ZV DESCRIPTION: ARNOLD RESIDENCE HEIGHT VARIANCE APPLICANT: SONORAN DESIGN GROUP-TOM APEVAK OWNER: ARNOLD MICHAEL E&VAUGHT-ARNOLD LINDA A Notation: ARNOLD RESIDENCE-HEIGHT VARIANCE Receipt By:DRM ******************************************************************************************* DRM PAID BY: Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 8006 150 . 00 TOTAL: 15 0.0 0 FEES PAID: Description Account Code Current Pmts BOA INDIVIDUAL FEE ITEM 001-000-408 150.00 TOTAL: 150.00 Account#: Ending Balance: $ ' 7919' -"*"''' 1.'"— ----1.Q.V.3 i . , 2' RIDGE ,a% ,)%, _____.., ---..... %1 3 S---- ' Zi (?2.4 c ,„.., _ c:2 7 87.44' ." Ilk ic- - ---. 187--- 1 '' r.! .. Lii iiinp 9. 10' (4,..T. 0 %z;:#) ----- 4111 '" ''''' 1 dP,...- ''''..ar‘ 4130 ir \ -V011 >N,%. 464., 0 ...N.' '''''''''.4 . ' °I(Iti IV6 ,../.0„...„FIM r I.....,, , ,,,1„, 7,Z.fro '49141M 4 0 L' 1 -...1 (130 . NT:0 '-,,,,.<41,10yi. I-9 - r ------- ---,I 0:2 s., i#7,9 -.........-a' ''.'ii' I 9 ---..... . . ,,, , i -L-3,, L 3 -. 1"--- -4;IL& ''''----' BY mils LAT Az ..i. '.--.....„,... LLE it lb- ''',1. 70 5 iii. 1/4.4 i'.., '''''94- 22 °) it."1"r 8.11 4" 65 23 P b AREA= (0 - i 21 977°C AREA= 9 1 287910 :ft0 32,E a .k�, 1 T37rW\ \,, ..) - I.,67 )41, L 162F �- ' tee.. 0 *, 4 At * 1 _ .....22111 FLOODPLAIN LINE TABLE . SERV Tl '_.-EASEMENT TABUS LiNE IR TI DISTANCE LI r T E E E Ttc DI T1 � f82, 731 1 , r 36.01 ' L104 N53-23'1 Er E . L68 NIA N/A L105 N47 �44 41.0 " L 1 51 '6 1*W 4 .. L69N/Ar 1 . c — — SLOPE E MT. TABS 1 70 N2 7 'O0`E 61.45" L 107 S76" 4 1 E 17.38 L71 53721 41, 4 1.34I V L108 SOT 21 FO 'e E I1720' LINE jD!RECTION DIS0 1°2511 m . • ♦ iii,i4,.. _ ih 4iii4 111111/'.�C i .i� .0 /• 1�1' faS -* r�t�� * ilifir ow :vct Alit v% 4* A t -V Si*$• ►ty AI . S ' 4MITA \ 11 , 1,4* ir� Vir-r--116 Ina 0 7*\\ 0 IS 1 dit 011tilltat wo NI _...,:aronwullta -vie- *Is • • AN NI iii 11.1% m INIVIRW ._ 111 4112 11117 XL* ii* Ilirtviim W.. ?f /IfI VO P 4** istititleh!I 11111 IRO Gil iiiiiiiill s •" -. a 41,V 1111)14 4 Ariwi NT RI Of% ft 41, Al . ,„ 411 .. v.p . 4, •• a mil lo : IIIIV km --/40, 44t.411 AM • Oil y (_,vo& , , , era ..TAN AhNV wiji eur iall,as I Eiji t .0 _c■STNA i ■011►r��. IMP ■c ill Il . Ig It illailMal' n 1 .j Ilft• 40 iikiL * ft _____Res4kainoiAl z. *1 Wv 0 , _ TYTd a 65 • • s • 4\14 , is , Is a(44 �• tA-* 3) IS -.m 0 ist, • � �44 � •- r. s♦ - , •• vox Is I PN I iti$01111111 •0.. INN IOW" Ole • :# 1r • • * i3�1,- 1 I � 11111 a II �� '4 � 1 is»�.�.. '�- .'tt ' * T..'.' • . ::; + __.,}Y+.*.tea ' 1 .i -' ¢ �• G, 444 •'• _ 4.-* r - _ro .,, y, ,"'R' t._*. , gig. ,.74.4'.-•*,4•*,,'lki.-,--1; l'i' i4611A/ .... , Ai:.e ..,:.•,.,:.:•7..-1.. .:„A.7 ./.'*,,g*--',7,":. -44 -.."7.....„....1,'4,4.:...::,:.1.,4:4,,-,..,1.,.i-..‘ :.„,-,:..1. -.-_,1,",-,..:1:,•.'a,...-..' ;,•..„--sf*'„-- ' r +1 .., io„..,,,,,,,::;4•.....,..tir...•.....,..-....:...•--.:,,,.,.:,,,,..4: (,,,:::...-ii. '7.. '' ,•..: Witettek 4t, ' ... 44, V .4,,,, 1 • • ,_,.,.,._,....-„, --,,,,,,,,,, „.. ',.0-_-ry.•,, :-,,,: . . , s K !! to,. „ 'i • r ,gyp ,�+( • T 'a ' y a. xw roc , y z • ■ r�*. a� �'� #ct , a• s.,° -,_r - ice „ 721 W . Sedona Ridge �'34 �� ■ `-'1 - ',A1 �5,�5?,�S. ��tip s ��v .�' y..,. . r :--'11'-..;,:: .,..::. A € - •� :Ix :4::L:,4iettoi;„_,:..1..*:,*, r,., ,,.,,, .,..,. .., >t. - _ < •Nnes< •.- -'sue. .. » ,�{ . i*p i ii -.-'.. ...,. - __.-. ...",,'.'''. ; a , 8.) i. .. • • # �.. _ .. \ F` _- * tit • . �' t`� f -,-:.--4.41:„.,ak �a _ / •TI i---..' '-likikl*. \ '',444- ..;'_•'.. .-;....•:.'..„.-::-::', '-'. '' kr,:At: • . -„,*„..tok.,,. ilt„..:--..-. I\ 'i.—1 ,-•,:-.. - I- .„•.•.-;4'.;.:1 /14. • ' - . -. .....-..-;•,•..„..:,..„..,:._.,,,.',...-----,,,...„,:-. .N.:,'-',0,-,:,•,...,-;• / ,- _ . ' \ \ ,.,‘..'.-',••.:-4,- -:'4"....'••• , '--- ------•• ,,,r.._ ,i,,,:.it' ' -'''' '4. .i'17,,T '- --'..1 •:' \ .'• 'N•J.1 ,L , '" • , JJJ > 4 11...._ ji„.1— ;„•' i::.:. .,-''''t //:: :- . -,.,•• • iii, . • :**.-•'. Y.,...:'... .,',:t ''-•1 , -- , 1' 4 R p{�q A E., .,, ;.. \- .-,.., ' ,\ :,..7,..,....:f.,_ ....:.:..'4t:f$::. :.'..-'-'.._ .. ,,,,./, . -:'..:::.'------,--..--..-.? •,,...•-.:'': -.'4!"',.:•'.,-•',.,i„.-'1,.':: , _ ,: ....... ,...i.--;,.,,'-- .„4,- Ate:i..,.vT,.,,,,44t;,444;*-i_,,, ,,,,,,,,,.... • "" • -itfl'''•-:,•:':•.;ik. 4 i, . It -., . .f. 1°.7.'t'll: . '.',.-..'; :7' ,,,:.*....r— _ , -6,-io. 7.- If. , # _,4 i- T 41,.. „>'M�+*'i� 3?g •' - Ir �q. * �.._-�-- it RY A"� -Y 7 --� ' !.. arm. ...1A- r "`h ' . - . . ' \ i - .-:' 1- ,•'' l'T '' 4 .4*-,04 l• --, • ' ! if ,••.,,+•-,-. .�y - *ft --ow.11.. ,_, , . .iht ..,..../ irt/: -• / - sus " - �a. � '+rR' , R • E" s - p ._ apr' \ , \ • +w • .+tit bli �" ' tor. ,,. ,4tt. ipa Illt.:.�aoiss' ` \ Y# �� -may` at. .:4111'."; .: .�- may ` n• to .y _ - ' - 4. ..,. , i^ `t' ((I 4 ) . IP .. ,.. 4 ', ' :.�� w4'\ %-' ,2\ ',.,.1•,„:.-,*, ` x i tom'� , t "t ? " : * � *.tiID' , _. rt € • )>Iiiir i,T ' F ' r / 1 \ 1 61x5'x ' CBC ; I Q 100=25 fs • \ : i\ cu — — — — ---_ _ \ Sedans Ridge Place \ \ - (Public} 17Nv=285257 PAVING I GRADING 1 SEYVER AS BUIL \` DGEIIII SHEET 112 ` \ \ ` 11111111111111111 .11141ftw ------ __7 i, i Ci0K\&e An-101 PC17 NI�cI 1 I \ \ — \= \ — — �"�""' — FLOODPi AIN LIMITIjiiiiiiiiiiiii // ------- 7-: ^�. , C21 / to so oNL---t,,.. C=3 \ \ ---V,! cv i \yDRAtNAck EASEMENT \c' ,` / VIIP" jr . / / CD __ 4:r% - ADS 8 FROM ijo \ —� -- -� i ,,- 9/ z''' 4 1/ 11 \ , 07-- (--- i ' Tops of W.I.Rail I, . } :841...____, ,�- ;-ti �� �31.? j / D- F AtPe- �- I Top of nini.g wag 2829.0 28.5 ,r''� i -c 1y` i / ----- ,„...,____/II li 1_,...,0 IT : .1. i s i'\ 1 isA4,:," ''5(12) . '4 r,A4 -.".• gig 144 S P , I 2 / 'ice/ , , 2f1 ..P'..7 ? nso..--\ - \ 1 r \ L� � l Jai/ R \ \ A.. i7II - �- ---.�..�j� % Top of WJ.Raa�2832.5 ,: • � *11, ` '•.8+ �/\ !- Top of Ret�tnn Wag�2829.0 ,-.1/41:4 .43 --,.. .. ,..51/4 a�i. \ \-, ,-I- J ---Top of W.:Rail=2830.5. `;' 28. / li +29 :' / ?5'SIDE ----Top of Retain' WaQ8.0 _�.�, • ���� \ 1 tit„. SETBACK ---- , } fFE 9.33 • J Lst,f ---�� � i� / FP 2828.;� -4/..), �,zoj1+; 4 .,.,.._F.,-.43" \ \ \. � ��t�\ _- -'� i i ` j''t� �� l Hof RetsinfK18�?S6 '; 29. - ,`1 � �i r$3 32 / e4✓ S yr-- ki•' al.\ — tal:s ' 1740 7 /6 , c/ b GRADING LIM • /fig 5 • �� �� `� \ /; AND SILT FE� / 1 / / .z / / .P' it\k/ !........ ty 4 _ ', / , _ _.__ R.2g35 15'SIDE 1 , 29.5t• / 11I (oho. 5` •At;: TR83:' %/.l. , % 'r'� �#� ' ( ( i ( 232-6 — \II I :2. • \I # :, �i Tap of Retaining Wall 4.00 F_ - 1 fop of'1�taini - � /- .° 9.0 i \ + ' �� , 'Ci t/Wah3s °\ 17/,, -o gio cd -A=3.1..../ PA=35. . IrltuiT- --- �v/ -' �/ •`i \ \ ''. \ 74. - f J^� 1 of,Badc Retaininv+r �O O '-- , ' v� 30'BACK CA \ -, —*� GRADING LIMITS ft nnatural grade. i M �0 �.L / I SETBACK N \ , �((� �� In L Conservation Easement CO \ � 6S 1. ' ••l i 1 i `� `� \ ,\ \ ; •91�� V ' ...4,1.,, ''�32.6T - - + , ~ '139.69'N89°46'52°E 7 -*\ �� a NORTH �-, SCALE 1:20' 00. SITE/GRADING PLAN r 1 REVISIONS BY: DOOR 5GI. 6 SIZE TYPE 44/34K5/\6 SIZE TYPE REMK5 1 I 2-0060 Ni19M' II 4 260o M0.1-0N 2 I *Ito 56p 5Y5 TSP. 12 1 2400 0AO0 / Tb:_b. / 5 I 0060 500 _Ter. IS I ecyo HCelcvl 4 I ,pop o1D. VIGIL 14 I 2-26.6 ON HOLL �'-0n / 5 I 0 50 014D. 111541. 15 2 2060 40LL 4 sow 55 b I 50 . r - IS 2 6060 H0.10N 0TA66 1+1 2000 MORON I I 5060 HOLLOW el-rMS b 1 2-ZEO H0.1AN 10 I 2666 142LL041 M,T. 'Q 4 I 2-2400 H0.1O1'1' 14 2 2666 HOLl424 o Z HoJp I BD OILFa7 10 21410 Ha1a BBQ •uoarALLR D OtWDE CH EADALETE vamLAT0 GOV'D PATO NON-VENTED 46'-0"x12'-0" FIREPLACE 0• SIZE TYPE REMCS C)6 SIZE TYPE RETKS 0 8 GLS.11'-0" A 2- - A K 2 4020 MIXrX Ta = B I 40a 15A. L 1 0020 nx Ta'r DINING G 5 as M I 5040 5H. IS'-ik(S-0" D 1 5060 nor N 2 sao l0 GL6.10'-0" //o J O © O E 2 606o 0 1 6016 xo 662016 xio P I 6050 AR l4 TEMP ARCH �ii'-oN;%' L (1)14'TREADS H 4 506 Xo Ton (2)b'RISERS J 4 501. Fix Tar x Q TAW" READS 2PR0 GLPARANC6 nFERACE �' UP ISERS wn6'WOE RAND HEARTH PER NOTE:ALL WINDOWS.TO BE MET. Z`M' lSll'illIlliIl R1005.10 OR R10042.2006 IRG. i i PANTRYgREPOR7 ALL � E.\ p g.ItnSQUARE FOOTAGE it S ARE TO 41" . / 1 COMPLY MLIT1. `ID'xIG01JARIS Y .SS� SAFETY CERT'FIED LIVABLE AREA 5J16 52.FT. P 6 Z K ITGHEN DOWN co, D ENTRYCOVERED PORCH 65 5"�' 12'-0"x16-0 6ARASEE 451 52 Pr GL6.10'-0' \ GREAT ROOM 5TORA6E 66 52.PT. !tgg tg ; Y N ❑ F p p BARD RAIL 2T-10"x22'-:O" TOTAL 42.FT.. 5104 52.PT. z a 0 A 0 0§ N GL6.12',6" lAi �u 10'-0k12'-0' 1$ BEDROOM#I DM GLb.1O'-0' II QH V GOV'D PATIO 13'-0"x15'2' 12'-0"x23'4' P A F Q g i:4 GL6.10-0" II THE FIRE SPRINKLERS WILL BE A GL6.O'-0" �•' _� I / J I AND THAT a (4)14' THE FIRE SPRINKLERS WILL NOT BE INSTALLED UNTIL THE FIRE (4)4 TREADSRISERD SPRINKLER PLANS HAVE BEEN wa _1 UP AIL H OrRTHE EVIEWEDTOPPI OF ORO VALLEY HAIVR BATHROOM HALL To• -,,,..AR'� I 1 O GL6.10'-0' A uTe A i . ,-,-(.. /i P 4 I 1 ® PWDR A 11J AT.J POYER�i 0 O � Z. T (I)12'TREADS MASTER Q UO DI � �l 1 6�"w BEDROOM � I I BEDROOM#2 DEN �Z Y "" Is'-0'xls'4' I© [- 3'-0"xl3'4" i P GL6 10'-0" Z 2'-0'xl3'-0' _ _ L GL6.10'-0" I 0L6.10,0' '- Y1 CZ in UTUTDI O x GOV D C© ` \1 O iL6.lo'-or -1.. ENTRY �11 UPPERXIII GABS. 'F�rj u 6 b'-'4"x9,0" o o SEAT Op -� Lpl Nc - O ' O '1®- ®�M 10 T�� Io 0 O "R 1rL ------' Q 4"TIRE STOP\ O TR pREfAB - � 0 G0Jk61 MASTER r BOLLARD/ a ^ MM BATH T14 14'-0kl3'-0° � g ><IO �.V•_Fri pD 3-GAR GARAGE A t 4 34'o°x26'6' GL6.9'-O" _® TONE VENEER O RIS GOFFD us. STR6. STONE VENEER/ I I ® rT C II 5'-0'�I'-6' ® g GI-6.0'-0' W.I.G. '" lo'-4'xlo'-O" w `n GL.6.4,0' a o � �pi J O BIB 11-11 R 13- APPROVED BY: TC///PZ/DRB BOA 93 i S A © © ©TOW VENEER 0 I A a BASE DAA /, v \STONES r PZ PROJECT MANAGER Q \STONE VENEER {- tS °,\ .BASE W r _' �• 55 a1 1_ '-0` / 5'�' / 24'O' )4" 4' / 0-) i. 10 ��, / �> YP 4� ' M.E.G.GALGULATIONS BASED ON: Ae,.,DR CAVITY ONY C . OR UA IILL 2000roc 0 PERJIETERR-VALLE R-VALEV,.FACTOR Q GOP4.126ELL P4046*46Kd27 MILNE, PLAT CEILING OR 5G1550R••-- 5195 50D OD • III O � SKYLI6WT I. FETAL F461* ••, \ 16 0600 D _ T.� N* EVAK WALL I: W000 FRAME,I-T'C. Jr 5T„ KO 4b 144 WIDOW METAL-. ,,,,,,�" - 522 Ob,O 560 F- C4E140'D W10gi METAL-- •."0-' BREAK,1Vw F PANE 7I6 06T0 240 Q G.H.M. 50LD DO0R5: SOLID 46 0.400 M z DATE PR, SLAW 46 0.460 25 ^, 4/20/06 BM B o11- 2 0300 II EY` 4r�F 6ARA R4A1 0E 15: P4000 FRAME,IV OD. 500 IT I/4":1'-0" 6ARA0E DOOR 2: 50UD 20 MD I OD 0240 6 FLOOR I, UNVAT19I7 zJOB 140. 5.021 9JRNACZ 1: PORLED MOT ARC OD'Iri51L. 515 I OD - PUR04CE 2: FORCED NOT AR T6 NW I BEET AIR CONDIT10061 I: ELECTRIC CENTRAL NR 10 SEER AIR COIDITIQ0R 2: ELELTRIG CENTRAL AIR 10 ketl 1/4... l OF SHETT5 t' 1 REVI51OS: BY: 5-PLY BULT-UP ROOF ON CONCRETE TILE ON 1-440 TOP OF GHIMEY TO BE 7-0'ABOVE MY ROOF I/7 SHEATHING NAILED OVER FELT ON I/'SIEATWN6 NAILED_ NITHN 10'-0'4 5'-0'ABOVE TIE H16VEST PORT OF NOTE: FRAMING MB R5(PER FRAMING OVER PE-841N�D THLGEE5 PENETRATION PCl IRO 2005,SECT.RIOOIb. CONCRETE TILE ON 1440 . PLAN)w R-50 BATT.INSIAATION w R-50 BATT INFO-ADM PET CFI V2'SHEATHING u ° TRUSSES , ALL PARAPET HEIGHTS ARE -�-�-"- ^"o w a-Bo BATT FELLATION TO.PARAPET S'-0 TD.PARAPET 1154' 0 DETERMINED FROM THE MAIN 0 TO.PARAPET 1144' - �I�N`•-..`, 2646D 264463 ,, TD.• - 115'-0' S_ ..�::�s��%;+:�'e:!;, K� :__ FINISHED FLOOR OF 1001_OII Rm— Area:a i nieifttar 1 ftat lc... TO,PMAPEi Ib'-O' 2D4535 PRE-FAB WIC. PRE-FAB CONC. fl3n ��� �1--�,q� TD.PARAPET 104 8 264235 TRIM t KEYSTONE TRIM I I�YSiONE .I.., Qi� ii TOP Of ARCH II'-0 ti..--..-..--.- ..M1 --__..N�..•1 I �e't.SPRING LINE 9'-0' OrD.DooRS ID'-0• TRIM yat!:�1���1:'�r�_, -�- 2640h5 "'±r`.�7- \ma's.: iA l ....�I:1:1�1�1�1:N�[:I,11:!::71":, O��.P:�.. P.l.:+..,A.PLATE 100'-0'" 1 Ei ❑� , «T T v OST9�'-0s O 11UM 1 KEYS• TA.BASE 104'4' - \ / -rr - STOtf VET®! O 235435 a X - _�__�' ��--e f 4 211/35 O fFE.TOY-0' --- - ••' :g - _�s1 �csl FFE 762b5 _ 32 '47�� ! ETA BASE 101'-O' pY9C 0 'T z�a Aweri z.4asariir I�llMiwesi 235I35 * y< ki EXISTING GRADE STOW VENEER `FFE.10O-0.630 ^'�i w 9� eo�- .a1= r-RI- (€�I O PPE.2E80 5 �� - p_� �i 5�� �m - O '3 b 1 ' F.F.E.99'-0' 29 -FAB - --.G 9_- 9_.—i moo- ' F.FE.262935 \/ fi Mil �,i STONE VENEER 2676 \ EXISTING GRADE O ��55 SCALE: 1/4" 1'-0" < Z rdel dr:Ili:IN !ll NM O TO.PARAPET 116'-0' .[ r�r�P�PPr� w�l�I 1�1+�I wl rlT�[r!r�rr�wlrn+-Fwl��Frw.rFn-Er��+!-ITI+�!•r�[>•[+1��ia�lPsw-E r++�l• T.O.PARAPET 4"0 234635 __L„,„ , .._.n-. .- ___, , ___. __-_ . . -. . , y . TO.PAS 114'-6'O O TO.PARAPET 115-0' 264335 !DST FIG-FAB CONC. — OTO.WINDOWS IIO-0• TD.WINOOMS 110-0" 5 1 TRIM l KEYSTONE 2 640M E E 2E4033 0 q --�--_- ' =. 1 i fig Ili �--��►��� '� ���.��� T.O.BASE 104-0' 0 55 ■r—63P.-- F.F.E.1074' 1 -1 EXISTING GRADE/ NI, _ - � - ' ,PLA F.PE.2DS2b5 1(1 52 �� 32 T (e vyi 51 51 / STONEVEEE- I cL Y AFT ON EXISTING GRADE/ ' ` SCALE 1/4--1'-0" in I TOP OF CONEY TO BE 7-0'ABOVE ANY ROOF WITHIN 104'l 5'-0'ABOVE T}E HI6FF5T POINT OF 5-PLY BUILT-UP ROOF ONCl VER PENETRATION PER IRC.20D5,SECT.RI0016. VY SF149 ME 6 NAILED(PE OFRA FRAMNG MEMBERS(PER FRAMING CA } PLAN) AN)SiR-30 BATT IRE LATICN TA,PARAPET 116'4' T0.PARAPET 115'4' •'_ - - - - - - - - - - 264635 O .�_.._.- --- O yl y 2646D slip' i-i-J TOP OF ARCH 10'-0' 7A.PARAPET ITS'-0' 0 0 TO.PARAPET 119-0' 264233 SPRNGS LINE E 9'-0' ! T7.WINDOMS II7-0' O 224223 O T O.WINDOWS 110,0' . iD.WINOONNS IIO-0' OIE-COAT STUCCO SYSTEM _�, ON WIRE STH ON 2 'YERS 00 _......_ 2,.., .......____. ,.. 2640� GRADE V'PAPER ON I' �•" �' ' RIGID�NEUL.BD. 0 TD-D07R7 106'-0' ! �•' �' -111111 OVER 2 x STOS•k'OL. or 1Q7 i ]D5695 �;- �. .7 .. /' �.0 SEE�GEAR WALL. re' _.........-- 36 FIREPLAC _ NONE _ _ _ ____.- 95 O I f I EXISTING GRADE PFE.102'�+' O _ __ 52 PPE.2632b5 Ccpe F.FE.100,0' .-`1 51 V PPL N�-0. ---0 �E- --- \/ T_ C II 0 FFE.262935 '-- li �r��� 24 EAR ccsE Y A I ON 8.26 / SCALE 1/4"=1'--0. O d EXISTING GRADE 2b?s 0 l(/'`ll C CAV CONCRETE TILE ON I-440 1 1 PELT ON V2•SHEATHING NAILED c OVER PRE431GINEERE12 TRUSSES w R-50 BATT IN51LATION O9StO TD.PARAPET I16'-0' TD.PARAPETII6'-0' \ TA.PARAPET IL7'-0' 2646BS 1 -��� 284i.65 0 V 0 TA.PARAPET 1144' --- `-`-. 26'IBn _ -...` ._ =••�IIb1�bI.l.Ibl6tbrR161RIb1RIb1.1�IR �- \ TO.PARAPET ITS'-0' 0 ,.•;wr�' ,i!rN�I�r�M!I.I!I!ijl!r!�I!!�r!1!tA�i. 23460 'mil 7Di4M "li Ir Il 1 1 1 TA.PARAPET 13'-0' 0 < OTO.PARAPET 112,0' . - 7 ., ->Q _ .�,.-...-_� _ .-. ._ .-J-ti- --�.. _ !."� .-.s- _ .--. ,�_ _ r.r- *7" 2542l3J 234235 ,--ram Z PRE-FAB CLIC.-�_-_,< :-1Nb1016i616Nb1.1 t 6 c/. .., BD.BEAM 110'-0' O `-- -1-1.. ,.; APPROVED BY: TC/ Z/DR:'B p 0 a........... OA :, O rD.NAM 10e'-0 <ili_ `1 1 1'1 1 1 1 1 1 t t 1 1 : ; �0 1 • 2651133 0 TD.W142015101-0' , 6 a t E3 • D1 26?1� DATE �4,. ,��� n Q NON-VENTED • O UN N LWgRBL FFE 107-0' =�'�_®_ .r '`` ��F11 PZ PROJECT MANAGER PRE�`"'u-'� 0 PPE.7652M • - _ r ( � DRAPNBY: 2681".. EllI 1 i I!En (2 12'SAD ERS z BY: 1i_�laigP -,o,a.--mil _ PPE 100'-0' FFL 99,47\ � �d ±i g ppN, PPE.265035 DATE w�i/fs�l_�S4iw- ---- ILI - PPL 262438 •..-_ 'i' .a- -�- 4M/O6 _ 2b28 RIG-- ELEVAT O\ __ V4,1.SCA-F STOE VENEER 21 5021 __ 71 JOB NO. 26 -- / SCALE:1/4"=1'-0" SKIT F. EX STING GRADE +� D EXISTING GRADE 3 / `OF SFE£T5/ AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF ARIZONA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF PIMA ) Audrey Smith, being first duly sworn, deposes and says that (s)he is the Legal Advertising Manager of THE DAILY TERRITORIAL, a daily newspaper printed and published in the County of Pima, State of Arizona, and of general circulation in the City of Tucson, County of Pima, State of Arizona and elsewhere, and the hereto attached: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ORO VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MAY 23, 2006 @ 3:00PM OV 10-06-04 was printed and published correctly in the regular and entire issue of said THE DAILY TERRITORIAL for 1 issues; that was first made on the 8th day of May 2006 and the last publication thereof was made on the 8th day of May 2006 ; that said publication was made on each of the following dates, to-wit: 05/08/06 at the Request of: Town of Oro Valley by A �.&, x �� ---L-- gal Advertising Manager Subscribed and swo n to b for e is 8th day of May 2006 . JAMIE C. MACIAS f\f\n\`3 It rTh q, ,7'11 Notary Pubii:••Arizona (Not Public in and for the County of Pima, State of Arizona Pima 'County - Expires 02/04/08 My commission expires: "` • NOTICE OF.PUBLIC HEARING • BEFORE THE ORO VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT In accordance with Sec.21.6.H of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised and Arizona Revised Statutes Sec. 9-462.06, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Oro Valley Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing on Tuesday,May 23.2006,commencing at or after 3:00 p.m.The meeting will be held at the Oro Valley Town Hall, 11000 N. La Canada Drive and the subject matter will be as further described below: OV10-06-04:Sonoran Design Group representing Mike and Linda Arnold request a variance from the 18'build- ing height.up to 20'.when measured from natural grade on a custom graded lot with a greater than 6% slope. Subject property: (parcel #219-50-0030)located at 721 W.Se- dona Ridge.Oro Valley.AZ,85737. Site plans are available for review dur- ing normal business hours at the Oro Valley Town Hall,Development Service Center. Persons interested may appear in person,by agent or attorney,and the petitioners must appear or be repre- sented.Any person seeking further in formation on this request for a variance may contact Patty Hayes 229-4819 or e-mail:phayes@orovalley.net. REQ: Sarah More,AICP Planning and Zoning Administrator PUBLISH:The Daily Territorial May 8,2006 hrmay23ov10-06-04 a.s NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE ORO VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT In accordance with Sec. 21.6.H of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised and Arizona Revised Statutes Sec. 9-462.06, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Oro Valley Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, May 23, 2006, commencing at or after 3:00 p.m. The meeting will be held at the Oro Valley Town Hall, 11000 N. La Canada Drive and the subject matter will be as further described below: OV10-06-04: Sonoran Design Group representing Mike and Linda Arnold, request a variance from the 18' building height, up to 20', when measured from natural grade on a custom graded lot with a greater than 6% slope. Subject property: (parcel #219-50-0300) located at 721 W. Sedona Ridge, Oro Valley, AZ, 85737. Site plans are available for review during normal business hours at the Oro Valley Town Hall, Development Service Center. Persons interested may appear in person, by agent or attorney, and the petitioners must appear or be represented. Any person seeking further information on this request for a variance may contact Patty Hayes 229-4819 or e-mail: phayes@orovalley.net. et6, / ' */'" /(1}.6- Q: Sarah More, AICP Planning and Zoning Administrator posted: 5-4-06 time: 9:00 a.m. by: sg NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE ORO VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT In accordance with Sec.21.6.H of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised and Arizona Revised Statutes Sec. 9- 462.06, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Oro Valley Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, May 23, 2006, commencing at or after 3:00 p.m. The meeting will be held at the Oro Valley Town Hall,11000 N.La Canada Drive and the subject matter will be as further described below: OV10-06-04: Sonoran Design Group representing Mike and Linda Arnold, request a variance from the 18' building height, up to 20', when measured from natural grade on a custom graded lot with a greater than 6% slope. Subject property: (parcel #219-50-0300) located at 721 W.Sedona Ridge,Oro Valley,AZ,85737. Site plans are available for review during normal business hours at the Oro Valley Town Hall, Development Service Center. Persons interested may appear in person,by agent or attorney,and the petitioners must appear or be represented. Any person seeking further information on this request for a variance may contact Patty Hayes 229-4819 or e-mail:phayes@orovalley.net. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE ORO VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT In accordance with Sec.21.6.H of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised and Arizona Revised Statutes Sec. 9- 462.06, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Oro Valley Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, May 23, 2006, commencing at or after 3:00 p.m. The meeting will be held at the Oro Valley Town Hall,11000 N.La Canada Drive and the subject matter will be as further described below: OV10-06-04:Sonoran Design Group representing Mike and Linda Arnold, request a variance from the 18' building height, up to 20', when measured from natural grade on a custom graded lot with a greater than 6% slope. Subject property: (parcel #219-50-0300) located at 721 W.Sedona Ridge,Oro Valley,AZ,85737. Site plans are available for review during normal business hours at the Oro Valley Town Hall, Development Service Center. Persons interested may appear in person,by agent or attorney,and the petitioners must appear or be represented. Any person seeking further information on this request for a variance may contact Patty Hayes 229-4819 or e-mail:phayes@orovalley.net. L n z JiilPI .., aril :,,r,i .1.,1' _ ,...„. ,/,‘,,4 .„ „,„......„...,..„ , .....,,,,,,,, ,„,„„, in .,., ./,, .,....,,,„, . , ',/ / iiit„, , lippliolif gy ,,,:,: : OF ' ib _1KTII. -'1Wilit Offillik" . : iit, IIP(/ ,/ ,, / / • , _ .,, ,yam ,/. ../. iiiit //,,, 7,:,„„,,„ , //,>/ , , ,,... . . ,,,, i ,, , / ..,..,..f , 414r9'x'S't.,,1:;/ 1,4 IFAL , „........., , .0.4 / i 4,44;1* , /L. ' - 0,•,,, , . ilk we ,,,,, ,,,, ,..v?,,yfost. . .. .,:,„1„ ...,,), ii...... .40, 44 ,„. /<oii:.; ,i;.,/,,„,4:?//i:// ,,,,,,i„,,,,,,,44 11*kitelo, ', .;/, ,,,\„,,,, \‘, . -;,,,,,.-e,-- /,;101f#,/:/,/,/, /'''2xiA '1. '''mati"kil ' ,y;*4,/ ,,, mil : _, , gir , ‘:$4', , ;,-,/// gi":),r 011/ Ili I y irAtt,(4.41114111 ,, . 010,,,,„ ' . , , , , hit ,., , , ,.., , . ; ,„,,tt „......,,,,,,,,41 ....„..,,,,....,,,,,,, 0 my ,:/ iiiiii ,77,,:y:,. of.,,,, ...4:. 4 p\,4 NN,„., „ , .. walk , ...,IT Attir01114, 1411•11/11 i• ' , ' / ; : :,,,' .,- - imp' ' ,/, ,,„., „„ , , , 0 TAtiula oil "'AIR ir . r. „, ..,,..„.„..,,„„,,.. „,,,,,,,,,,.,iv,;4,.: "/ '"' . ... ,,,, it,;,,,, ,„ P d . ,,.,,,,, .. / , illE;i1t4.„,,,,,/ , ,,,,,, ,,,, "' ' ' ' ailir. lal° ' '' ''''' ' \\,,,, ,, , -, ,• , ,•, ,,,, ., .• - ',/,',.' // ://://: / ' i ';',:, .:,. /./ •aii•if \ J:,,, .; A AGENDA ORO VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT REGULAR SESSION MAY 23, 2006 ORO VALLEY TOWN HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11,000 N. LA CAIVADA DRIVE CALL TO ORDER: at or after 3:00 p.m. ROLL CALL MINUTES Approval of the Minutes of April 25,2006 AT THE CALL OF THE CHAIR,THE AGENDA ITEMS MAY BE TAKEN IN ANY ORDER, AS DEEMED APPROPRIATE. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. CASE NO. OV10-06-04: Sonoran Design Group representing Mike and Linda Arnold, request a variance from the 18' building height, up to 20', when measured from natural grade on a custom graded lot with a greater than 6% slope. Subject property: (Parcel 219-50-0300) 721 W. Sedona Ridge,Oro Valley, AZ 85737. 2. CASE NO. OV10-06-05: Tom and Sue Hayes,request for a variance to build a wall varying in height from 6'to 10' at the front property line, in Tangerine Meadows subdivision,zoned R1-144. Subject property: (Parcel 224-02-0370) 11425 N. 1st.Avenue,Oro Valley, AZ 85737. 3. CASE NO. OV10-06-06: Robert Page,architect representing Jana and Brian Davies, request for a variance from the Type"B" buffer yard (min. 15'); eliminate required screening and reduce required 40' building setback to 20'along the north property line abutting an R1-144 zone. Subject property: (Parcel 225-51-0130)7780 N.Oracle Road,Oro Valley, AZ 85704. 4. Planning and Zoning Update. ADJOURNMENT A packet of agenda materials, as listed above, is available for public inspection at least 24 hours prior to the BOA meeting in the Town Hall Administration Building,during regular business hours. The Town of Oro Valley complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA). If a disabled person planning to attend this meeting requires any special accommodations,please notify the Town Clerk at 297-2591. NOTICE TO SPEAKERS Members of the public have the right to speak during any posted public hearing; however, those items not listed as a public hearing are for consideration and action by the Board during the course of its business meeting. Members of the public may be allowed to speak on these topics at the discretion of the Chair. If you wish to address the Board on any item(s) on this agenda, please complete a speaker card located on the Agenda table at the back of the room and give it to the Clerk of the Board. Please indicate on the speaker card which item number and topic you wish to speak on. Please step forward to the podium when the Chair announces the item(s) on the agenda, which you are interested in addressing. "Notice of Possible Quorum of the Oro Valley Town Council: In accordance with Chapter 3, Title 38, Arizona Revised Statutes and Section 2-4-2 of the Oro Valley Town Code, a majority of the Town Council may attend the above referenced meeting as a member of the audience only." Posted: 5-19-06 4:30 p.m. lh `� r MINUTES ORO VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT REGULAR SESSION MAY 23, 2006 ORO VALLEY TOWN HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11,000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE CALL TO ORDER: at or after 3:00 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Paul Parisi, Chair Bart Schannep, Vice Chair Colleen Kessler, Member John Hickey, Member EXCUSED: Andy Martin, Member MOTION: A motion was a motion to approve the minutes of April 25, 2006. The motion carried unanimously, 4-0. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. CASE NO. OV10-06-04: SONORAN DESIGN GROUP REPRESENTING MIKE AND LINDA ARNOLD, REQUEST A VARIANCE FROM THE 18' BUILDING HEIGHT, UP TO 20', WHEN MEASURED FROM NATURAL GRADE ON A CUSTOM GRADED LOT WITH A GREATER THAN 6% SLOPE. SUBJECT PROPERTY: (PARCEL 219-50-0300) 721 W. SEDONA RIDGE, ORO VALLEY, AZ 85737 Chair Parisi swore in all witnesses that were intending to testify. Thomas Spevak, Project Manager for Sonoran Design Group, explained that the variance was in regards to an 18 foot height limit from the natural grade. He explained that the topography at the homesite shows a low natural grade at the center of the proposed custom home placement, and a parapet of 15 feet and 18 inches above the low spot exceeds 18 feet from the natural grade for a small portion of structure. Zoning Inspector Patty Hayes reported that Mike and Linda Arnold were requesting approval to build a house on a custom graded lot with a slope greater than 6%. She explained that the building heights are measured from natural grade on lots with a slope greater than 6%. She reported that the 10 feet of foundation and the 3.5 feet of fill exceeded the allowable building height of 18 feet by 2 feet because the natural grade at certain points of the building was significantly lower than that of other parts of the building site. She explained that the amount of fill dirt accounts for a portion of the allowable building height. 05/23/06 Board of Adjustment 2 Minutes Ms. Hayes reported that Sunridge II was a 65-lot subdivision, recorded in Oro Valley in 1995, zoned R1-20. She said that the subject property was a 29,215 square foot, square shaped lot, and the lot had a floodplain to the west, and conservation easements on the south and east, and a slope easement on the north. Staff finding of facts: • Lot 22 has a 12% slope under the house pad. • The building area of lot 22 is restricted by slop, conservation and floodplain easements on all sides. Driveways are allowed in the slope easement and screen walls allowed only with homeowner's association approval. • The building walls, including parapet, vary from 12 feet to 16 feet and 6 inches in height. • The section of house in question is 15 feet 8 inches from finished floor, 16 feet and 5 inches from finished grade, but exceeds the 18 feet from natural grade. • The applicant states the building has been redesigned so as to minimize parapet elevations, and that the structural components and approved design prevents further lowering of the parapet. Chair Parisi opened the public hearing and swore in all witnesses that were intending to testify. Patrick Lewis, 704 West Sedona Ridge Place, stated that he could not support the variance because of the height of the home, and the retaining wall. He believed that this would create a potential impact on future home development. He proceeded to distribute photographs of the site and identified specific locations surrounding the home to describe how the home would impact the neighborhood. Chair Parisi closed the public hearing. Mr. Spevak pointed out that one the issues addressed in designing the roof parapet height was the surrounding homes and their view corridors and he felt confident that the adjustment would not obstruct any neighboring home's views. There was discussion regarding the following topics: • Alternatives for the retaining wall. • Alternatives for the parapet height and location. • The possibility of lowering the home for less fills. • Would there be room to move the structure south using the same design. • How was the topography causing the special circumstances? • How was criteria item #3 being met? Gary Moreno the owner of the Sonora Design Group explained that the Lewis's view quarters would not be affected or blocked in any way. He reviewed the site using photos and diagrams of the area. MOTION: Member Hickey moved to approve Case OV10-06-04, a request to exceed the 18 feet building height up to 2 feet when measuring building height from 05/23/06 Board of Adjustment 3 Minutes existing grade on a grater the 6% slope, with the caveat that it not exceed what has been currently shown to the Board. Member Kessler seconded the motion. Motion carried, 4-0. 2. CASE NO. OV10-06-05: TOM AND SUE HAYES, REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO BUILD A WALL VARYING IN HEIGHT FROM 6' TO 10' AT THE FRONT PROPERTY LINE, IN TANGERINE MEADOWS SUBDIVISION,ZONED R1-144. SUBJECT PROPERTY: (PARCEL 224-02-0370) 11425 N. 1sr. AVENUE, ORO VALLEY, AZ 85737 Chair Parisi opened the public hearing and swore in all witnesses that were intending to testify. Tom Hayes, 11425 North 1st Avenue, explained that the request was to build a wall on the property line along 1st Avenue to block the noise and sight of traffic. He explained that the wall would vary in height from 6 feet on the north end (where the topography rises) to 10 feet on the south end to tie into the neighbor's wall. Senior Zoning Inspector Dee Widero reported that Tom and Sue Hayes were requesting to build a 220 linear foot wall ranging in height from 6 feet to 10 feet, on or within 10 feet of the front property line. She explained that from the front property line to the closest portion of the main structure, a wall could be no higher than 4 feet 6 inches. She said that from the front of the main structure extending the full width of the lot, running back toward the rear of the property, a wall may be higher than 4 feet 6 inches and any wall 6 feet or higher was required to obtain a building permit. Staff finding of facts: • The proposed wall will match the architecture of the existing home. • The wall will match or blend with the proposed wall that Mr. Blair, the neighbor to the south has proposed to build. • Property line walls are allowed without permit or approval up to 4 feet and 6 inches. • This addition should not pose any other zoning issues. There was discussion regarding: • The height of the sound abatement walls Oro Valley intended to install on other properties in the neighborhood. • When and how was it determined which section of 1st Avenue would get the noise barriers. • The proposed wall gate height. • Could noise be considered a contributing factor in a special circumstance? Chair Parisi opened the public hearing and swore in all witnesses that were intending to testify. Bill Adler, 10720 North Eagle Eye Place, stated that walls had virtually no impact on noise and that there was no such thing as sound abatement with walls. He explained that the only thing that would absorb sound was earth and berm. He stated that the 05/23/06 Board of Adjustment 4 Minutes Board should review the request objectively and adhere to the Zoning Code because he did not believe all of the five standards had been met. Julianne Herrera, 501 East Monaco Place, said that he had no problem with the variance as long as it improved the area and was aesthetically pleasing and was made of good quality materials. He explained that he did have some concern with the Hayes' water line on the northeast corner of the property. He explained that because the line encroached onto his property, he hoped that staff would look into the matter. Harvey Blair, 11355 North 1st Avenue, was in support of the variance request and believed the wall would improve the appearance of the area. Chair Parisi closed the public hearing. Mr. Hayes stated that the special circumstances did apply to the topography because his home did sit on a hill which was affected more by the sound of traffic than the lower line properties. MOTION: Member Kessler moved to approve Case No. OV10-06-05, a request to build a wall varying in height from 6 feet to 10 feet on the front property line for R1-144 zone, located at 11425 North 1st Avenue. Vice Chair Schannep seconded the motion. Motion carried, 3-1, with Member Hickey opposed. • 3. CASE NO. OV10-06-06: ROBERT PAGE, ARCHITECT REPRESENTING JANA AND BRIAN DAVIES, REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE TYPE "B" BUFFER YARD (MIN. 15'); ELIMINATE REQUIRED SCREENING AND REDUCE REQUIRED 40' BUILDING SETBACK TO 20' ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE ABUTTING AN R1-144 ZONE. SUBJECT PROPERTY: (PARCEL 225-51-0130) 7780 N. ORACLE ROAD, ORO VALLEY, AZ 85704 Chair Parisi opened the public hearing and swore in all witnesses that were intending to testify. Robert Page, the architect for the project reviewed the variance request application. He explained that the applicant was requesting a variance from a Type "B" buffer yard to a Type "A" buffer yard along the north property line between R1-144 and R-S zones. He reported that this would eliminate 5 feet of the screening required along the north property line between R1-144 and R-S zones and reduce 40 feet of building setback along the north property line to a 20 feet setback. Senior Zoning Inspector Dee Widero reviewed the report. She explained that Robert Page, the architect for the property owners had designed and submitted two concept plans for the site. She explained that the first site plan met the zoning requirements; The second plan was more desirable to the owners but requires a variance approval. She said that site plan #2 was a court yard setting, confining the business activity to the center of the complex and, providing an enjoyable area for the future tenants as well as being less intrusive to abutting properties. However, she explained that in order to construct the proposed site plan #2, the builder would need relief from the required 40 foot setback. She explained that the applicant was asking to encroach by 20 feet into 05/23/06 Board of Adjustment 5 Minutes the required setback along the north property line only. She reported that the plan did meet all other required setbacks. She explained that the required Type "B" buffer yard was per Section 27.6.E Table 27.7 and Table 27-11, requiring at minimum a width of 15 feet; the request was to reduce to a type "A"with a 10 foot minimum width, per Table 27-10 (the same table is required along the south property line.) In addition, she explained that the applicant was also requesting to eliminate the 5 foot screening requirement along the north boundary line completely, but that the screening was not required along the south property line, however; it was required at the east or rear of the property. Staff finding of facts: • The two plans submitted are concept plans only, and there may be other conditions that do not meet Code, that will be addressed with a later process. • All variance requests are solely for the north property line. The applicant will meet the requirements of all three issues on the south and east boundaries. • The parcel to the north is vacant and undisturbed. • A 10 foot minimum buffer yard is the requirement for the south boundary and at least a 15 foot is required on the east. The plan meets Code on the east boundary. • Screening is a requirement for the north and east side; The plan meets Code on east boundary. • The proposed construction will be built to architecturally match and enhance the existing building on site. • The applicant has submitted a plan #1 that is in compliance. • The General Plan supports commercial and development to the north on a site fronting Oracle Road. Discussion followed regarding: • Changing the 40 foot setback requirements. • The modification of the buffer yard requirements. • If the request to eliminate the 5 foot screen was denied would the wall be extended only to the new building project or would it be extended to the entire length of the north side of the property? • The difference between the landscaping and the buffer. • Non-Conforming Use. • The differences between Type "A" and Type "B". MOTION: Vice Chair Schannep moved to approve Case No. OV10-06-06, in regards to reducing the required 40 foot building setback to 20 feet along the northern side, but not the granting of a variance for the screening. Member Kessler seconded the motion. Discussion: Vice Chair Schannep explained that he had no problem in recommending the reduction in the setback because of the existing building setbacks. He explained that he did have some concerns regarding granting something special that might affect future owners in the northern corridor of the neighborhood and their quality of life. 05/23/06 Board of Adjustment 6 Minutes Chair Parisi opened the public hearing. There being no speakers, the public hearing was closed. AMENDMENT TO MOTION: Vice Chair Schannep moved to allow the Type "A" buffer yard 10 foot minimum as opposed to the Type "B" buffer yard at the 15 foot minimum that is required that has been requested. Member Kessler seconded the motion. Member Kessler stated that it was difficult to make a ruling on an assumption, but if the Board wanted to keep it to a minimum, then she did not have any objection to eliminating the 5 foot required screen wall. Chair Parisi agreed about leaving the screen because the screening could be removed if the northern property became a commercial property. MOTION with amendment carried, 4-0. 4. PLANNING AND ZONING UPDATE Planning and Zoning Administrator Sarah More announced the following upcoming meetings and projects: • The Arizona Department of Commerce would be sponsoring their annual Boards and Commission Conference in the Phoenix metro area in November. • The Town Council was currently reviewing the budget for the Fiscal Year 2006/2007. • Planning and Zoning is fully staffed after several months of being short staff. • Staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission are currently working on the departments' Work Plan. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: A motion was made by Member Hickey to adjourn the meeting at 4:37 p.m. Member Kessler seconded the motion. Motion carried, 4-0. Prepared by, Linda Hersha, Office Specialist Ni,o_EY , .,� TOWN OF ORO VALLEY eo � , OA. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT /4 r Planning and Zoning•Building Safety At p. 11000 N.La Canada Drive,Oro Valley,AZ 85737•(520)229-4800•Fax(520)742-1022 't Oro Valley Public Library A A- A A 1305 W.Naranja Drive,Oro Valley,AZ 85737•(520)229-5300•Fax(520)229-5319 Parks and Recreation �A' 1 >.; tx 680 W.Calle Concordia,Oro Valley,AZ 85737•(520)229-5050•Fax(520)797-2202 DUNDED 1g May 24, 2006 Sonoran Design Group Torn Spevak 3530 N. Oracle Road Tucson, AZ 85705 RE: Case No. OV10-06-004 Parcel #219-50-0300, Sunridge II lot 22, request a variance from the 18' building height, to 20'. Dear Mr. Spevak, At their regular meeting of May 23, 2006, the Board of Adjustment voted to approve your variance request with one condition. The plans submitted for permitting must be identical to the plans submitted for this variance. You may proceed with submitting the building plans for review. Please include a copy of this letter with the building plans. If you require a copy of the meeting minutes,please contact the Clerks office, to receive a copy of the minutes from this meeting. Linda Hersha, will be happy to assist you 229- 4744 or E-mail: lhersha@.orovalley.net. Sincerely, /71 Patty Hayes Zoning Inspector Town of Oro Valley C: File www.townoforovalley.com