Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOV100609 HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION Post Office Box 40790 • Tucson, Arizona 85717 • Phone:520-795-6500 • Fax:520-795-6501 Online at www.stratfordinnnagement.org April 11, 2006 Frank and Mary Engle 11550 N. Copperbelle Place Oro Valley, AZ 85737 Re: Lot #23 Dear Mr. And Mrs. Engle: On behalf of the Architectural Review Committee (ARC), additional information is required before final approval can be considered for your plans. Please reference Article II Palisades Point Estates CC&R's and Design Lines for more information: 1. The building site grading area is to be staked and stringed to allow the ARC to count the number of "A" and "B" trees to be effected by construction. • 2. A building height pole needs to be provided showing the highest point of construction. 3. A landscape plan is to be submitted for areas outside of the patio walls. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact my assistant, Cindy Kline at 795-6500, ext 40 or me at ext 19. Sincerely, Steve Ivanoff Steve Ivanoff, Community Manager Stratford Management For the Palisades Point Estates Homeowners Association �p,V,�EY ,gi1,, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY o e a ,1� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT gt, N„, '`'-. r Planning and Zoning'Building Safety . to., 11000 N.La Canada Drive,Oro Valley,AZ 65737•(520)229-4800•Fax(520)742-1022 411 i- Oro Valley Public Library 1305 W.NaranJa Drive,Oro Valley,AZ 85737,($20)229-5300•Fax(920)229-5319 A"d M_ ZA Parrs and Recreation ,C c,5:,:.. 1 ik 680 W.Calle Concordia,Oro Valley,AZ 85737•(520)228.5050•Fax(520)797.2202 cs'otva Et) May 31, 2006 Weststarr Custom Homes, LLC. 1051 N. Columbus Blvd#102 Tucson, AZ 85711 Regarding: Palisades Point Lot 23 Dear Mr. Gomez: The Palisades Point subdivision was annexed into the Town in November of 1994. A pre-annexation agreement was made at that time allowing development under Pima County standards for the next 10 years. This allowed a building height of 34' as called out in Pima County's CR-1 Zoning district. When the two story house was submitted in January of 2005, slightly two months after the expiration of the pre- annexation agreement, a "grace period" was allowed for this house. However, since this DRB approved house was not submitted for a building permit the expiration of the pre-annexation became effective. Palisades Point is now to be developed under the R1-36 Oro Valley Zoning standards restricting houses to an 18' building height. The 18' building height includes any fill dirt that may be added. Unfortunately the house submitted for permitting under permit #B06000293 exceeds the 18' building height as described in the previous correction letter. I apologize for the confusion and extra time this has caused you and your client. Please take steps to revise the plans to comply with current codes. You may contact me at 229-4819 with any questions. Sincerely Patty Hayes Zoning Inspector T wn of Ore Valley cc: Robinette Architects cc: Dee Widero, Senior Zoning Inspector www.townoforovalley.com June 11,2006 Town of Oro Valley Planning and Zoning Dept. Attn: Ms Patty Hayes 11000 N La Canada Dr. Oro Valley,AZ 85737 Ref: Case#OV10-06-09,lot 23 Palisades Point Estates. Dear Ms Hayes, I am writing to address the variance committee, as our travel plans established before a hearing was required, prevent us from attending the hearing in person. Our lot is located in Palisades Point Estates, and is 1.2 acres in size. We have resided in this subdivision for 7 years, having moved out last year,to a temporary home in Oro Valley while anticipating construction our new home on Lot 23. (We have owned this lot for 4 years) I am presently on the board of directors of the Palisades Point HOA, and have been active in our development since our original purchase there in 1998. Our request for a variance relates to a corner of our proposed home being out of height requirements from original grade,under present OV guidelines. In considering our request there are a number of points to keep in mind. I will attempt to be brief in stating our position and in asking for your support of our variance request. a)We have been refining the drawings on our home for over two years now, during which time,unknown to our architect or us,the 10-year grace period expired. We had been originally granted preliminary approval for a two story version of this home under the old rules,but found in 2004,it was going to be impossibly expensive to build as all of the builders had all of their capacity sold out that year. So we went back to the drawing board and redesigned the home as a single level, at the same elevation. We even rotated the house 20 degrees from the desired orientation to conform to the average grade requirements. This still preserved the views to the east and south, and allowed us to design a home that would be pleasing to our neighbors as well. b)We have engaged Robinette Architects, one of the finest firms in Tucson,to design a home that would be an asset to the value of surrounding homes in the development. His homes have been featured in the first issue of Oro Valley magazine, and are noted for their beauty around Tucson. In addition,our builder,Michael Gomez of West Starr Homes,is a Harvard graduate in Architecture,and builds only a few custom homes per year. He has been featured in Builder/Architect magazine, and is presently completing a beautiful custom home just north of Catalina State Park. My point is that from the beginning of this project,we have attempted to design and build a home for our own use that would be both visually appealing, and enhance values in our community. c) The corners of the home that are not in compliance under the current regulations are outlined on the top and elevation views enclosed. They will not impact views of any neighbors,due to the size and grade of our lot. As you can see in the elevation drawing,the view to the mountains, (East),is not compromised by this variance request. The parts of the home behind them are taller and meet the current standard. This is due to the topography of the lot and the view from the street level when standing on Flying Bird,looking east,to the front of the home. d) Failure to achieve this variance will adversely impact the surrounding homes and us, as a redesign of the home would then likely necessitate the loss of the area called the Sunset Porch. This would result in a smaller home,at greater expense,and loss of the views to the Tucson Mountains to the south. It would not offer as much curb appeal to the neighborhood as well. e) Palisades Point Estates is a subdivision of about 63 homes on .7 to 1.5 acre lots, and it is almost completely built out under rules that have only recently expired. In granting a variance,the home can be built under the same standards that the balance of the community was constructed under,with no adverse effects on the surrounding neighbors. We sincerely hope that you will realize that the variance requested,will enhance the neighborhood, in no way impact the community adversely, and that you will embrace the design with your approval. Thank you for your kind consideration, k and Mary En e ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT REPORT CASE NO: OV 10-06-09 Hearing Date: July 25, 2006 Agenda Item No.: 3 Prepared By: Dee Widero, Senior Zoning Inspector REQUEST: OV10-06-09 Robinette Architects, Inc. representing Frank and Mary Engle, request a variance from the 18' building height, up to 23', when measured from natural grade on a custom graded lot with a greater than 6% slope. Subject property: (parcel #220-07-0530) located at 11321 N. Charoleau Drive, Oro Valley,AZ, 85737, in the Palisades Point subdivision. REQUEST SPECIFICS: Frank and Mary Engle request approval to build a house on a custom graded lot with an average cross slope greater than 6%. Building height is measured from natural grade on lots with a slope greater than 6%. The proposed height overall is 15'6" in height, with the foyer being visually the highest point at 17'9" in height on a 6" foundation. The southwest portion of the home, ranges from 11' to 14' in actual height; with an allowed height of 18'; add the amount of fill ranging from 8'5" to 10'5"; requiring a height variance from 3'5" to 4'5" because the natural grade at certain points of the building is significantly lower than that of other parts of the building site. The amount of fill dirt accounts for a portion of the allowable building height. 11' actual height 14' actual height 10'5" fill 8.5 fill 21'5" total 22'5" total -18' allowed - 18' allowed 3'5" for variance 4'5" for variance MAXIMUM HP1011 TAW TA T71:' JP r )11 f NOTIFICATION: All property owners within 300 feet of this property were notified by mailing of this hearing. The property is posted with a notice of hearing and the hearing was advertised in the Daily Territorial. At the time of this report preparation, staff had not received any public comment in support or opposition to the request. EXISTING LAND USE AND ZONING: On-site Vacant land Palisades Point-zoned R1-36 North: Catalina Shadow—zoned residential PAD South: Canyon Del Oro Wash and Steam Pump Ranch—commercial PAD East: Canyon Del Oro Wash and Oracle Road West: Palisades South—zoned R1-36 SITE ANALYSIS: Palisades Point is a 66-lot subdivision, recorded in Pima County in 1993 and annexed into Oro Valley in 1994, zoned R1-36. At the time of annexation November 10, 1994, an agreement to apply Pima County zoning regulations for ten years was established. As of November,2004 the agreement is no longer in effect. The subject property is a 1.2 acre lot. The lot has a floodplain across the front with access at the southeast corner. The parcel slopes from 2650 up to 2680 (30'),with a finish floor elevation of 2675.5. SUMMARY: Staff finding of facts: • Lot 23 has a 12% slope under the house pad. • The building area of lot 23 is restricted by slope, only driveways are allowed in the slope easement. • The building height varies from 7'6"to 15'6"with the foyer being 17'9"in height. • The section of house in question is 11' to 14' from finished floor, 11'6" & 14'6"from finished grade,but exceeds the 18' from natural grade. • The owner has been working on the design of their home for over two years. Coming up against some hurdles, one of which is expiration of the annexation agreement. In Pima County the height limit for CR-1 is 34', with a cut and fill of 15'. Oro Valley R1-36, 18' maximum height and cut and fill of 6'. The Board of Adjustment should consider the following findings in making its decision: A. That there are special circumstances or conditions applying to the property referred to in the application including its size, shape, topography, location or surroundings which do not apply to other properties in the district; and B. That special circumstances were not created by the owner or applicant; and 2 C. That the authorizing of the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights; and D. That any variance granted imposes such conditions as will assure that the authorizing of the adjustment shall not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which such property is located; and E. That the authorizing of the variance will not be materially detrimental to persons residing in the vicinity, to adjacent property, to the neighborhood or the public welfare in general. SUGGESTED MOTION: The Board may wish to consider the following motions: I move to [approve, approve with conditions, or deny] OV 10-06-09, a request to exceed the 18' building height up to 4'6"when measuring building height from existing grade on a greater than 6% slope. ATTACHMENTS: 1. BOA application 2. Location map 3. Ariel Photo 4. Site plan 5. Plat map F:\ov\ovi0\2006\10-06-09\REPORT.doc arah More, FAICP Planning and Zoning Administrator 3 ����EY qR�� TOWN OF ORO VALLEY oQo z � : PLANNING &ZONING DIVISION 42005 � VALLEY AZ 85737 4 1. ; 11,000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE,ORO A _,; -�4" Phone: (520) 229-4800 Fax; (520) 742-1022 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION FOR: X Zoning Variance Note: Submittals are due by noon Zoning Interpretation Appeal of Administrative Decision CASE NO.: 0 WO—0(, 9 NATURE OF REOUEST: • • _Expiration of the pre-annexation agreement for Palisades Point will prevent this project from being developed to the standard of the existing neighborhood and adjacent properties, specifically with regards to allowable building height. Current zoning requirements will not allow this project to blend with the existing neighborhood context,will severely limit the views from the property, and have a negative impact on the property value. Only a very small portion of the project exceeds the current 18'-0"building height requirement, whereas the entire project was in conformance with the original development standards.The Oro Valley DRB and the subdivision previously approved a 2-story version of the project,which had a greater overall building height than what is being proposed now(that project was not carried through the permitting process). Request variance from 18'-0"to 22'-0"maximum building height. APPLICANT: 1° i ce l -cAN-i ce3c x-.5, PRONE: 23 - l"1 FAX: 6255 - ADDRESS: 1 con o e✓. k-i , I2 g'S 7 l_ - OWNER: #erg, — .Ez-`( _- ADDRESS: C)t `r�s�- �, h�z, SS--1 PROPERTY LOCATION FOR VARIANCE REQUEST: 1 11"2" '� , G'6141"o L`--'°.`s PARCEL##: 22 v- 0-1 - oz 3 o LEGAL DESCRIPTION: d r 23, p..t-%.%.1...©ems Po tir-� CURRENT ZONING: l - 3 co ,..__ APPLICABLE FEE: l '— ATTACHMENTS: 5uN,. ark- Qv-gctiora_.1 ss dF T,t i.-tifJ(C 1 SIGNl� OF PLIC T (ALSO PRINT NAME) DATE es- t9VT r't r ( ( 1 ( o c_ 1 TO1 J OF ORO VALLEN PLANNING DEPARTMENT 11000 N.LA CANADA DRIVE ORO VALLEY,AZ 85737 AM *PHONE: 229-4800 FAX: 742-1022 200t RECEIPT ****************************************************************************** REFERENCE NUMBER: OV1006-09 RECEIPT #06P00256 SITE ADDRESS: 11321 N CHAROLEAU DR OV TAXCODE: 220-07-0530 DATE: 06/01/2006 TIME: 02:39 PM COMP TYPE: BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT TYPE: ZV DESCRIPTION: ENGLE HEIGHT VARIANCE APPLICANT: ROBINETTE ARCHITECTS,INC OWNER:ENGLE FRANK W&MARY E JT/RS Notation: ENGLE HEIGHT VARIANCE Receipt By: DRM ******************************************************************************************* DRM PAID BY: Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 12953 150 . 00 TOTAL: 150.0 0 FEES PAID: Description Account Code Current Pmts BOA INDIVIDUAL FEE ITEM 001-000-408 150.00 TOTAL: 150.00 Account#: Ending Balance: $ SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONS FOR APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE Please provide the following information addressing 1 -- 5 in the Findings from. Section 21.6 I of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised (OVZCR). In order to authorize a variance request,the Board will be searching for sufficient evidence in accordance with the findings. 1. Are there special circumstances or conditions applying to the property referred to in the application including its size, shape, topography, location or surroundings which do not apply to other properties in the district? Relatively steep slope with 100-year flood plain at low point of property dictates construction on hillside; Pre-annexation agreement allowed neighborhood to develop with a greater building height,this project will be restricted to where it will not be consistent with the overall neighborhood context. 2. Are there special circumstances that exist that are not self imposed or created by the owner/applicant? • Expiration of pre-annexation agreement imposes height restriction not required on adjacent properties or overall subdivision;previous 2-story plan approved by subdivision and DRB allowed for taller residence than what is being proposed now,previous approval made no reference to pre-annexation agreement or grace period. 3. Is the authorizing of the variance necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights? Yes,reduction in allowable building height will require a substantially lower finished floor elevation,which will have a drastic impact on views from property; adjacent properties are configured to capture east-southeast views,this project will be severely restricted and will have a negative impact on property value. 4. If granted, will the variance impose such conditions as will assure that the authorizing of the adjustment shall not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which such property is located? This variance will not grant special privileges unavailable to other property owners,it will allow this property owner to be relieved of limitations others did not have to face. 5. If granted, will the variance be the minimum necessary to afford relief and will not materially affect the health,safety, and welfare of the neighborhood or surrounding properties. This variance will not have a detrimental affect on the neighborhood or adjacent properties, it will allow this project to fit more appropriately into the context of the overall subdivision. 2 Page 1 of 1 Widero, Dee From: Lee Pettit[Icpettit@robinettearchitect.com] Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 3:19 PM To: Widero, Dee Subject: Lot 23 Palisades Point Attachments: Site Section.pdf Hi Dee, I've prepared a site section diagram to help illustrate the height encroachment issue at the Engle Residence, Lot 23 of Palisades Point. It's worth noting that the portion of the house not in compliance isn't even the highest portion of the house. Also, while one area is over the current height limit, the house is actually cut in approximately 7 feet from the highest portion of the lot. The house is 18'-0" tall at the highest point, so the effective height is only 11 feet above grade. If you have any questions or if there is any additional information I can provide, please feel free to contact me. Thanks, Lee Lee Craig Pettit, RA Senior Project Manager robi_nette architects, inc. "1.670 east river road, suite"11.2, tucson,arizona 8571.8 520.323.3979 voice 520.888.5518 fax This E-mail has been scanned by McAfee WebShield. Any infected attachments associated with this E-mail have either been deleted or cleaned. --Town of Oro Valley Information Technology Division 07/1 1/2006 -,- j__., -------- I 4> \ c P) ) II \,, s•-•---', 1r' H !!!! HVIII lill . r: • -111111V r I. . . . 1 .•• • • •I• ... . 1 11 1111 H!i ,11( 111 H.1 1111 W11111101111 A 1111 '11I ' 1111 '•11 1 1 1111 11 111 111 4Q \ ri‘.. 1" 1. CP \C\ ‘'.. \ ' L.3,‘(,) l'1•22''''''''*1*/ ----t ,,,,„\,„ xiiTi.s---/ s•.--' ‘,..,_ ,),,\\1,.k.,,,::\,,./ . , 1111,0,10.1,0.1iii _.."......7..._____________...............__,. 1, Iii hi 111 .11 li ,iii iii ,•1! 11 , 111 ,11, 1 ,11H ii:' ,IIIIIII11 , ... , , , , „,, . . .:: :illi,i; . , , . !0! 11,, : 11 ' 1 111111 11 1 11H : b } \' \66:5' igf '''\0'1 10 \•\41Pr H11.1 '' 111 1 1 11 .'1 1.11 15 i \\\,. ,,y;t4it,\....,,, 1‘14., ,r& I. .4 II liowsw. •.•••••,.• .,.••,....,1:::::::::\‘/N/C> '''.....‘,1: , , • • . gg9Z ...,_ ,H1 h ill 1 , 1 II III il 11 III ii, I 11 1 • 1 j 11 ,-.', ., \ \ \ , \ \ /‘ , ', ‘•... s„ ... ,,I!!, ---- •* ,,, , , - .......„,.. • '. -••,.. ,.., Cr) : : :H; ' 1111 ''; L;! ilL,•-s-e :...q •,,, \ , \ id ,,, •,,,;;A: ',, '7 su % \ \ '', v.' r ,. 4::::*::3,‘,.•, 4..------ ,. - ' „- —: - ... ••••,, ri) Hil i ill lid 1 illi 1, 11 1.. \ \ \ \ /,t\;if3i*Mit,i4,;,,,;:f**::....,,;.,-6-;:;xii - p • —--------,z-------• s • '••N en :I!! !! 1.111111 —' -i il; .-•'111 Will': ', \\ \ 1 , iftiitn;:1;' ' -- -„.....____ 1 A..._...,,,•- ‘. -,,,..„ ,,,, ii, id iiiii! , \ , Iiiiiiiiil:r7,1:-.7 , .1,41.....,,,&•‘••••••• .,, ,1,,, ,,s --.:...:.!-...!%.,...-.!,-.•...,!.,4=--• _ .... •., , !III 1 1,1 I -i 11,1 ill 1 III I 1;11111 \ . , . 4 / „.., . , . 1111 1 11111 TO H / " / /- -------- \ --- wi 11 II 1 II ,N! H . .. 5 /1 •-••••••-•\ _.--/ n lil I I I I ill 1 1 , 1 \ i/ --------------0----\\ \ •- ° '` \•• ''' '' '' ' s'' hit I \\. • \I ' Iiii , I I I 1 1!!I HI I I --• ........ , - \,, , ' \ 's, ir• i....„.. • • i. • •-.. \ -- ',-- , Iii' il' IP il I II I I 1111 II • I \i'i•.\ \ \\, ‘, „...... _____.,, • —••••• I II MI II I Il si I I II II' II 1 IiII II I II I II 1 I , \ HI II I 1 III 11 1 ii \ \".777..... -•,....\'‘ i,,,,, ii,-... -• -.._ __......„ '•••... •.i if, I 1,1 : :: :11111111, li 1 H g / •„..., •,.., • •••,... ____-_,...,.........____, ---....___. .s*------ .--------''', •,,, . , , 1 ,,i1 1,1; E _..„ H.' HI 1111 HI 111 1111111 •1 / co.33 t ifiiiiiii:i. -- --------------.--'''''''‘... ---- H ir 11H A il, I 1 il I / II 111! ,H1 'y 11 II I i , , •• Ili WW1 ' i I I E-ri 2 "'"•" ;ii IL 'ill -I I , • 11 1 III 111 i „ 11, 11 . lilt 111, , 1111 , il r5.1 :5.4 .. • • • X 8 el 3 GI A II it co i' cid ,^, ,/-1 FA Engle Residence r robinott••ohlteots,Incs. .57,. Lot 23, Palisades Point 11321 North Charoleau Drive Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 04-37 la TA-1779"'". ". 4 wflebin000rchft*et eorn Lot Information Request Results [21 42 2 X ,4 A ,a , 4 ,� Parcel Number:220070530 t A. k ;: For more detailed information regarding this parcel,please click here. .. - r : d 4.'.. '{"} '... t .W �F ' to ' , * '4Sit,,,,,,- ' ,1 Street Address: .. - � '4*�� At T 11321 N CHAROLEAU DR OV e* t ' 4 k Current Mailing Address: ENGLE FRANK W& MARY E JT/RS ' 11259 N SAWTOOTH RD - ' , ' yri ORO VALLEY AZ „ -, `` 857376514 „{ 4 4 4 � 1 �' Legal Information: E t 1 OV , . . �,' PALISADES POINT 'L ' ' LOT 0023 `. a ., .* Subdivion Plat Book and Page:: 45048 1. � z View Subdivion Plat from Pima County -.i err. 1 Flood Plain Information: Lot Not in Flood Plain %- t; !_'•m-�---••------'' --- -I, Disclaimer:This information should be verified by the Oro Valley Zoning _i Department.The Town of Oro Valley expressivly disclaims responsiblity for -. - ;t r'' damages or liabilitythat mayarise from the use of this map. �'�`t\ g i ✓.WM,. c Oro Valley Zoning Code:R1-36 Zoning Code Explanation:Single Family Residential 1.2 RAC .3 s f Conditions: No Conditions found on this Lot t General Plan Designation: ` Descrptions for General Plan Designations are currently unavailable.Please 7'� \. _ refer to the General Wan web site. '. This location is located in the Amphitheater Public School District.For more information on which schools are available in the area,please visit the Amphitheatre School District_Website.. o �PLLY pRi e' 9 The map/data on the Oro Valley Mapping site is not meant to be used as an official or legal interpretation of Oro Valley features and - ,, , no expressed or implied warranty is made regarding their accuracy.While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy, - r`'' f f correctness and timeliness of these materials,Oro Valley assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions.For more information ;,, regading the information displayed on your screen,please contact the Planning&Zoning Department at(520)229-4800 or visit us at 6, oeo19.,'' 11000 N La Canada Drive,Oro Valley Arizona 85737. http://gis/aspsites/planner/psearch2.asp?PARCEL=220070530 07/17/2006 0i,ii"./...S..':...:. ...i...,„.,.:.-1 ...-..,.7-..:,,;.',-,,;•.-,4.-...4.....'....„.„4 L-„,,,L,,:,L,m',,:._1:..t.,.*„,r,i&-rL,....-..::.'L-:•'-..•.•L n.-L4L.,4 L'.,.-,".,,...t.::.)„ w ry pp`f - '' 'r.E Y" , --, -.z ,1- 3 .t & § n '..L.er. ," a ..� C• - 5". . •1„' 4 zf s ii 1`#`" ai '4„ , 'i - . ,- .f• ,`ffi i- 4 ,'.fit ,M4,'•-t,.A(",. ,N.„..„,'-4,-',,',.:., ,,, \ „v„- \- e •:LI.L: ilk I, r .. 1 • �ffr X ?` s . �3 4L' Ai is l i S Sx •ee ' '" ., _.,, - * ` 4'. 's rte"+' ¢'i' a :Nil 1 - �. f I ') n> • 14:... -_ ,' { .,'fib..' a` e S �Id{k rk , 4 `. N., " �' ('• y� ��� ffi�x �.S q�• �ia� .a3° ,..;,k �., \ ��s I. :" .. '�d�.`f .'� 9L • "n i air �,, I "- a&. ,• ,., ` v x _{,{ `'' ,i, -4r.„..=- � i •,,-,, . ..,,,,,,itimm.----- -,-,L -, .--.--,-.Ly','•,-:-.1.4,.?,-. ...,4riely -ir,1 •L ..,,,,:.., -A. . •,::-;..• •• •":*-''.,..:,.',-, x ss" 1 M . ',- --'''LM-ttelit.,;:',•,.-:".,:,-.,L:' :I ' ‘4.---.,...! ::,,7,...i.....4.:. .i, , . ,.:';''',2•74'''''''.•; .'Z,,','*i., .!`.,f,i''.....tr. 1 ti*L4- .„ ;;,:„: -,:•,..,, ''''.1:W �'4 � air �� ��� � ak � '�' �r �Cd.� '� � � �- �� � Cxi4 *,y5�'�'. " o _ r. " t,i‘ 7 �' �<. �; ,.E r : *.; ,� '.. , w .a.,i, - y'a w. .. .,.4 z " u 3 Y .L• :, u z r t c ,.+ ,i. s w +� *^s, x • ,,,,,,1., ..... ..,,-; t f .; ..�r ��*`" � sfi ,t 1 .; A _ a*,C :i .:: a� � t ! .m � jw L45 - •!, $ r .. • ,.... ..„....• „ ,.,_ ....r- -".- : ,:,,,,,,..- ;: . .,,,,,,..:,-,',"...,..-„., .,, ..,,,.\ ',::-.:, ,.. --,,,, ,. ,;.,,,÷...wL.;,,:;.,,,:i.:yii.:,,,,,.z: -04.v.',..,:,-.1.,;::::,,,,.:,.:A06,,, -„‘ , - .,,,,,..,:,,,,,,,,,,,„,-„,..,:-„,,,,,s.1,11...,.,..---::. ,-,.„ .:,.,,,, ..--,.•'4.*4•'•27"•'• • f*641t.;;; ::- '• ' .it ::-;•''':4,17•;i:i':c.:P,'•.'' ' ' '1/2. � 1/2 °.. Fit �` ff9`1 .S�( &5", x • c m`-,•,-; :-:.:.,.„-,4,,t,iie:,:„.,.,:.,,,A0.,.1,..-..-„,-, :,,,.-,:,-,:,,,,,,.. x , • .::^ s+ -._ :+:. �S ,"sk' „Fl ¢ u% 'R,T. atf iT 4. r > ,t S III 9� x �i ,�P' S X i 1 �.-: s vii r4 fi y;<', Ra,'• t' git'' �1: � � + • . f '',' '''',A,': 5 . .$:•. j;-------_ j , r i i a, , .z 1 ' v ,z ^y � .Pe wit z •' 5 t M -wY•, 8' '4" .a .,l e,+ ,.� �. ..� � r. � �... ^ �� �z. '.v� v' �',�.� eti�i� e • #F c, ��b `,° jt z f y �.t".e k 5 '� 1 fiery +S ! ..I .', ' if..,:-.,;,,..:, • ,. ',,',,,,„.,.''',--.-',7.1:‘,"-II.,,,, e ,� is t Syp A �i. ,, ...i v . :. .,:, a af''', '�"'"" ;�':i - ., *iq'•. '" .y ,.T ., ..,. ,, }� tt 1 �.*: �,�& � .. � az�. Y � �:**Or:':'''';i::::'::P i'..:::'..1 7.•:' :WHI1''':Jii::1741 ; . :11.:4;E:14':9�� � i• ..���� ;�3 • � � �,� i���y � �d ve� °`{4 ��, ��� � -I:� .»,.., 40 010 �.. 1 r° # 1� _ .'&,. ,r.. " Wr Asa �'s ? 11 get, ,,,, , 4„.. -'w �. ,e t-' •.:::. 11 il «,^a.r,�.y '.^ Pm ' ..; A l .a - .$: r4. �'° £ ,,,,,Alt. .£ II .0., i • 'sag p "3 - - 'tn ". .. .. ,s 4 . >a. -. .„r:=',wiz ': a F 6 w 'n ,� _ - IOD 1 ejo-fs....E i 1 SEE SHEET 2 35 1.•201.n 47 11 l ~ sspp. 1�2 I .,..-`4si FI .._i.s.SU FT. \. . / 0'9 so.F-. %/ 1 �\ I v 1 = a I / rh / SEE SHEET 5 s VI w1. rwd / Q 5 Grr'' ,'f'Eto 'i i `•.0 ® 42.1• 64226 SO.F-. 1ny'`_ 392G1 SO.FT. R�6 Nri' �1,,. r ryrb I` / ..�. �7 • . !r' h.'• fit' 33331 SO.FT. #44 '•'II* ��` / O r i ®' �n.,X , 1'. . 2r • • L t� x pg i°ri ® ♦♦♦ Jf� ♦�♦ '.oys4.E m R 521e2 SO Fr. f jc' 4 A. ♦• •♦♦�i�ter .4,j•e b • NORTH ,.0.. A....♦ ♦•♦ , f ►. ,wet 6 �tj • J +. s ,. 1� '' ra`` ♦ ♦♦°♦i♦ ♦ � • �� i I 32973 SO.FT. p t a.,,r+� ._��`1 •crg''c" ys �♦• �♦�°♦♦•�. �1 • ® i .. .. 6 fog. it.r.s ® / k :k a s` n.» ♦ti°♦♦A `:♦♦�.i!4 ♦.er , ;.r 47 ,., v 74,,�^� ' .:, ��, ..♦t►� ♦♦� ! u"nu",s"r F�m+crT es3sT BZo FT. �4 �, d 1 i 41 -.1 ....;:.,..11,1,-.:.,...7...." -, '-t. _ 3`+ �,7�/ 11U1 (6.1 v[.T;IK�C' % se27r7sT 27f.er t► e♦•♦•♦♦4, . 5Q O 7 A y ,9 A,f. 43736 SO.FT. y �:'/ift ri ♦► I 133r,r i u NO1 26972 SO.FT.®/7 1142 •.. •A 4 •: 4 ar*�l? 2,..T 11400 qq° V 4. y� 17 y r.C. s� 49 ♦ ♦ ► • >+t• �, ''ser,root 16 - A ,�23. 33921 SO.FT. � ®' WU , 7.'.d';;:c :a7>ii. lust N. sm,vs / '4 SI 6 <� 73... •4 IA 36432 50.F. .♦ f ► ]C v f 4R 243r4 a 153872 SO.FT. r:C`x iso ^�a ,e, a °ql41� ser3�3ot �' �.♦� J �"' `'OmB �' �� 11" �d 166 KM MO RAN uluua�-i 21651 •.'5: .7• .� e'y �' ••J.'~�'. F t a ,:d::s:y aowe,RE 34es6 SO.FT. I PI �� �°°• / �t���` 21 S g>° °ty • s= '�.ti..N. : ACO�s a Pusrc UTILITY . Tti °♦ 11 '' A sttiea,EN.. I P 16 ♦° ♦ 52045 so.R. 1 ♦ 6► � I .''� ,ielt: r�'.1.:1-+ A SE R E IMP °I T• ® I 43236 SO.FT. s Isotlr E ♦ ♦ r {. t`i 11 i " . -- i a 4 ritit4.4 34572 sa 1i.ii °•• i♦ko.4, ••'1 /' ' ♦has,;* ' r. 3'`1 " :. T mow' .� SN'a vetsmT,IsRa . +S •, .1'T___r_i 1.13.491.3191CV ACCES! I , 110 414 4,11 ' °1, ems 4��4}1� 1 �°�e ..A .dam '� 1s ♦ 4 +►t.1�.�=" .4r. 1 »t`;3g� .,:C,. �♦1. �♦♦ ♦ 1dj 1' t.'♦ •�� � tot+Y• I •g lac: • 3 / `' >y♦♦ tt ••♦• �, �" I214 • •_4•:'. ♦e•4'e♦,4r :, .z.y.. `. h. 1 g $ \' ♦ fr:,.ki 20 ♦ i'y1. •f �OOOee•0`�y.s.;.,r F � . d'' I S I ,. 15 • V ♦ ♦ 53438 s0.FT. • • ' I•• ••eee°e°�°•1�i.1 - 211a'4a 0. ^:? a i-ci�. +•{�S.1T6»' / / 39319saFT. X �i♦°� ♦••♦�� • • •••o••eat ,: i"' -f4' ... .1.: 'Z I .'• ;� �4 i�i° f•'i♦ i••o e• o 6D21W,W1 A6fA �p p I' / � /® ♦• � /�..`,, .••�••••e \4 ti •�F4'7tS ` TOWN ®1' oo / >S 18 � �i. *° �v♦ 14e 4 � ♦f`� ••♦4•e•e ,, a i4, 3 +*..-..•+..:. O I/v.o.', A •.4: ,•••Deco• w• $ 34402 s0.FT. O_ L. •� i•A it'd O°e•Deee•� • Y-- •��♦ee��►i see°�♦�i♦ee�:' ®.� t,o•4•,+IAN 4"::* 4"1144••i� .. ,, ,r x.�� I Annexed 11-10-94 $1'F., / a ` ° N`' 4a1,4.4a ' •. ;' •• .41e••r.tiDe•o• .4;-�.<'_ ,. �� � e• a rat•000ecoe ����';..;�:�:. -�'� Ord.No.94.29 i/ .• '. ma•�y,,�4 �40 its„ -• 0'bt :A e•o••°•4.04 "�t•°9°4q•0°•°•et• - rA x= f f t Y �,.� � yTLi' ♦4 °4- 4'4',.♦ ♦ *A / ♦. •4 i 4."y,.�N't1••♦•••e e -..„"', +�- V J l s63ss,fl 4.1• 116sst21 , ♦° u •...ta., ' .Jr . ., '. ♦,i�►k• a,..ert:40�44;4•e ,1.... - 11as1 „4.1 ♦ ♦°° ��0�=T� ,:♦♦r ♦�jyj�i� �r�,;;♦R�� • • •..��e°t°• ANAL PLAT OOP s ♦ e• • '�►♦♦• �i .<..6>,;:.66>. �`;�,000♦�,000►♦ 4 t oo♦ �1 ��0� 1 ♦p♦e;► ti♦ r �,•••.. . ►*.4ioe♦.00�►o,►000000*oo • Pa I ISaC�c�S If ! ♦ 0•♦ O.. ••. p�e.P4.40000000 • i a lgliMia i 9 ♦, �♦�► °��'•i'ti• ° soiaw�►4a�oi°i4io������i�e♦.o�oeoiao•,��t MAP 219 �� �ld1 _ 1l gee it fV...+►Owi4.'0�: )1 1.00♦ie?v,eivO♦ P0 m1'lt 1c6s?F,S,,11 ♦'!�!���0��0�1r� d��� ?'4i000®�<►O vO o..lze.r. P�' 000000OAOA000 tot.i-es e�Comma,ar.�.A.B.C.1 e l*SPltili,41. ♦Ay0R000-ivr:'OOOOOOOo000i0=Iv„�iO4 ►•00•1+1f .4,0 0!♦000.►A,► e. 1,,,orwlaww6.,.r..Kwer6..aa,..` ♦0 S:L000OOO�Djlo004�0♦0000 �Q Ge �+/ 1 -f AOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOA Q '., .Ile ome• ..,vow.nIntheG ether.e6e„1n..16onII. K, ,r 1...11 1 10000�:i�'!R000000®OOOOOieoe000�000000000000� ^�J' as are NA Rorer Gres are F1erm1.1� FdID (1 4 gEE SHEET 4 . ♦ V L #'At/ ii-.0 !o�i'i°iiiio♦•414y►'•A 0 EeaT OKI I.RdCs<Irrn Mil 10 ' 'I ♦♦♦O♦°.,.494,# ' , ./ �'�`-«rare •.Q► / �� �, • �4•���♦�♦♦'®�•♦�j41, O -173 r `� IL. • '�•• 130V /✓ SHEET INDEX O 1 • O�44,•' 'w 'IJOO-N. ► ` I • m _ SI T3OP5 T BOOK4 PAGE 41- 3 `r P. P' P. P. N O .r p a a. w p . m fr ! 1w N 7 P o p v p Pr P. p N w� 8 • � m $ tri:ialgtiliiiini * O a i i Sfi fg r P P P• P ti i ap i 6 rill a Sa qi a o r Si i iW 411111 P 9 y r m ril I/lit a tit lily 41 ifila lit RP p L:t.a 5 lir RI Itititapip.6;11g m gii 3 5, ri ill nIriallii i zT1[1 g Jr, .RI a B as a aLin r v -g gaa 3 }= A 1 4 tr44 ja ° li it li tqg ta 11 ji 11 ithil .a 2 a 0 1 Mit� a ,F av m a .4 .4ig 'ell H a i a a 8 girth Pi P5 1 Z Pay' i4 ail.Lti I tah f w a a fa ill li > Ilil pl t Qll gg iii:glia s a sa ill iEsQ lit litti qiii 111 a s slit z Phi}} 14' a } a r�r li a IPlijg g,, �hi ' .st r $ a is :2.!1[ g I€ ll I i 3 Ili a s I , a 3 s • a 36 t $ sws a " di m �' lid Si : _ g 1-: f 4a a lit • g a 3� s 9 a a -u 1 Ill le s¢� t lal 3 r h lh q 1 11 o 1 I lint ¢!� u a a a - g d v Tier, cA .tip8 w N !X €M F;i1 n C o $a 4*w pN �a m .. , Is E o .m.la�rr Y� g'6d }S }i1py�1167 Es 19 ; m n i wi tie iñ' a >s 1 41 Arm a -< IV) a_ II1 11;EP 8 f,', 1 Eg 2 hq D q z 8 p liV,F NI 51. a 1 E gr. I 1 / r tErti. . 19 r _1 a Fil zit ij'j :tft IQIt i I% s mA >_�O O si ISr- A-el 2; xi° lir till E- al ifg O it hicb Fxi A os a) o2 x 0 D 1 O »hri- pg141 f e z r;� 1; �� II Pi at 13HO 14 ; � li 11F m If!' lit Il ' g it a11101 a .. O 2p0f,,g O o i _ IR giN2F Z 2i ti-a o a iPii 131 clq ! h 1 ''' 11 1111 1.1!: / i i 1 Fai 15,, . 16 gi 1 -J. .. T a. rr - w .v - O tR DM l'f If I!J'ifl Pill --_-- a- ti I Pq 1. —.§tilepr -...., I m z ,65 Iliv__ * 11- I bit. RI i if ...,.., a M >i di I f it iVI ►�•�►ii�i•♦• •����._, ,:n ' *fr. 64-40400,:apa,,, r" vie r i.sf 21 ig § ' i , gi . -Z4:11$* 4 tl-, 4*.;.,•"."fr.. ,04,44.,,,•44A.,.....,44*..e. ,"'','% a,lii,1111, 1 ►�♦ ♦a . 6 ♦J'Ad► ♦♦; ♦ ♦' ,sS / \ .',.;44,' 4:1444-44:44,4'44*--641,„ 2+,4 4,1::.,:** / ° / ' 400,444.----i*. itiPi.--' .,-N.4.0)0p&A&4/:'..-.• 7--al,"4-i.- /0 41,,#*" ie. • - 11) . 40 ,ir , 1 V. ,...".z:._r__ 76''4,001,1:';"\t,444&4‘7. AM, . Ato, ,4,_,,,, .47- `::: ,,, c>c'‘v!,. -4;, 11*117. • • n a J `� �_ `1 ' '\,/ e ''4. 41 44, 6+4, 44 a: — r,; ' y iii �./ aN / , \� -> `a ����i�i,m m• mmw. / - /' `—f 'AMC Iww l ' tir, ' � ;7ygr � ➢ '. • w1 t� f 1�rr�raunvr � wa• � )� � � / '- - r �......y g • •'. 2 - ' iwitx #1 iotoo-A....iii-tkit-„:;-2,-z-=-Ate.,-.-, C n MAX a ��, .y-' L'��I k2sn u— -•st 1 _ ��.' 1 . 1,„104,.,.x..i„:411,1„,,,.:„.„.,,,:;.„0„.„1„..,,,ir.,,,,j.„6„5,..„, ,,...„..r. ..,,,,,..,.,.,,,,,:,.,,,..,.,,..„.„,....,....,,,_,,,.s...„..:.. i if M Li v �� x c➢ i j c➢ + 5 p /J((t 2 ,-('' - \ \ '44;te---:41, 07 ..,.. ..1E1169 , -' -Z4'''' ''--- „,„---'r 9, .„:::::,.. . ,4 . . ,,,,,,,v ,_.,jr,tii4;51.0., layesiiminnli ''9.. ----I' Zj N to O Y -.1.,_....„ _ F� ,,,rlid.. ' '• Y►, "-:""19-1�© �� ., ,,.^,i o �I ✓ ,� % 6: -..,-.7:,_vs.:!........,,„ . t:•.i,„.4.1si::,,',-,,-,,T,':1:,>•:::::: ::".•"..,,y!,1.,,,,,:. _.:,!,:',..',.-ii-7,-1,116.1 11411,.,---, _ •1:. -63 0. - .. .\\.,1 !c 0,- ,4,44i1.:::,/74ta.-dittl-4N : :41.-- 1--.-"': ' J' ''"L:44',•'''.,1...".. ,' ri. , . .^--,. ) — —-"0, >, m ---„ 4 - - pi NN ,,. .=\-1- -,• 14-'1; _-,..„---/,<7.------; e.•-‹ ,,,„-4 4.---:, ___.•-- N-, .. [.../ - ; r , ,„••••--/ ,' , .--",': ..-- ---- 4 - 11 I[IL I Iti* . se'""licillt •-,„lim0,-„It - =1-== =1=1�=== r:IP> / .E ''..% - Q,.."-Ami, ,.:-.-,•, 4 r 0 '• i:", 1 '' „,..., •---,.,„ .:____ 7,110,004i6-, . 4:11) I111�I11.UI'4i:cstwt Rn ' - OI u-u-i1i=n=n: �- 14 Q 0 1 1 r. 1 14 8 1 i 1 1! i i e't. g _,...,, ,., fr� w › _ , Engle Residence iiiiiil a lk Lot 23, Palisades Point m > 11321 North Charoleau Drive ; G2 14 i .4 n -, Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 ' 6 .r road,wIN 11 robbetto kics. on,arizona 0571! Project�/_37 { a'A 323-3979 ww.t.rern.zZehrM.a1-aom 1M.Draw➢q I.an i .00t o1.nw.and Y the o1 Robin.a.Aroldt.cb,know 0e drawing may rot e.rprod.wd a ngodctbn hone um/.snout m..4t.n porn..o/Robin.tt.Aoh%01.,Ina 1 ,, ,f-eC II 1 'tI 0 0 9 7 O 00 9 0 J / , cn i II ■* O E ..‘ ' ;:pt. ■f1 II , ,, rriIL rii I ' : C C I .: f—i- OM Itiill f-i- MI= ::;. I. / ........ I .Hutt I' MN liF 0 p 149 O O > 0 © O N II b b i I O!HP 1 u-ir ,13 ,,L ,.... , TT a 1 li, 14-0' 14'-d r� a is-s r k 1Y-C y JI r 0 00 o ® 4. t ')),,, 0 ,,,,„,,,: ?)1\ J I Ni M \ tri \ N _ ;:J 1.1 (I) eD ,... u) / . ., Cri .-,- p p Cri rt, I Oi .-) ::: ::::[.:::: I I (-tr A) , % 11P iiii i O i g� �UIII!ij : x '—'.... i .-, ,-, pi on iiiii: 5Z1 life' .6 o P.:Vitt . AG T. ii .1 immpq% ,,. n 3§ I !Pi 1 it 7 11 it!. 3' lilli! ;1> If ! 1 I 2 I - f - I z Pp , 1 ‘.. H15° §87g li - $3 g pl —li 1 1 r'i ! II 4 91rn 111 c y m \ u 1 I r O ' P f Y N p o a1 J aI Q 1 t.r N O 1 .\. r - x 1 z ,.,- 1 11111 o I I I i i oZ 7 ,s, 'if ' NI. *pm i 1 1 i .IlliU _,o 111111 .1 1 F ;!. 1 -133 : )40 f.' 17 i: an _,..: tin i r, ; 1 ..4.41.1 z , / • i c i i 1 .7 I g Engle Residence u t o 1.1 m \ , Lot 23, Palisades Point 9eg i 3 m2 ( ri- . 11321 North Charoleau Drive I ____ _ bo. Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 ]67Q w�i rlvor road.wIN 112„tuown.orizona 65718 Project#044-37 520 323-3979 arwar.rob,nr.NaarohMaet.00m We Drawing Yon Inebummt of service and b the sole properly of Robinette Art .lo.Ina Tdo drool.may not be reproduced or nprodatkn hereof used without the nRten porn Inion of Robinette Me eels.la. aD 1 ei� 1r-c I sr-0. '-• r-V 4•-r r-or r-0lr r-r r-,v r-r r r-r I ,r-1 •-0•, if-r ' , r-c r ,-'qr r if_rf t3" 8oe -rsuin i= - saa a N - O !I 1 ifiRMHIMIPIPIIIITIJIZI g Mil w— 4 i illall ■41: { it'll •i i 1 6 I �r-,r r-r d4 _ L € mP $ t o Tii v1 Z 4 4'-c r s4 r- r-r, s-4• ,B g g 4 r-4Jt - .1 i n b I- 1 1 O 4 I IV 00 000 [bit 41 4 N SI 51 tl O V P P ♦itilipp tpir 4 r _ 1 iiriyAMINIEz. ---- N ____ Nii,,, , Ivy 1, g) - ii ; ' 1"1 Wit! I L___J L J I ! II O N gP.' • ,-4-1 [...._ 1 --- i i i t-- . IINI COO 0 , 1 4 PP R I II 1 II 11 I ? , w F ii � � II I q g g � I_ L—Jl.— J , 1 1 N% e VJ '"�.0,70a tcuel ¢ NIS 4� NroJ �� IIV Z4D illiiii i . !' . 3"4 l! JIrIi d 1 Z 1 al it 4L i i Nii l t �` ... 7, _ illr i '11' 1 %Al Fa a 1 fly Z. I ®- O 011.7 Et < > ;\__ O 1101 0 I Li gi, plii /"11 I II"-- 1 0 0 e ,i %,)4....0 ,, Air A , ,fr• A 4 ‘‘,,,,ri NI z ii__I-_ *;..:telta,, N. 1 4 0 k lyeco . --� 1 r �,i1.I Ir O , z .,,,, , 0 , , : ,_ , • . k.,\ . -+- IL 1 '- ::yI , i0yt2?a4' Ali . ° *III ijal, lk I 1 $i �*i".` • ® tD o 4 1 © iY � J I �4_ II L ... 9=Mlls-r 7-V 111IJr-V r-o• a1t i1�!'�"a3111 CD WIM ENME111 m. ,== ,._ 1_-- / 401P.4' . � INZ 401)1/ 1 .�II Cam®--�\\ q � ® qL� 11111 • AI r-¢ .� r-c 1 t{�-e•� ia c-v 24•-0r I•-v'iIIIIII �D l O 0�O • 0 tic \ / 0Ix Ai E .141 tzt_\ltli FN1+3 pi k Immir 74 - L �' r'S I, �� i - z - ®�■ L J O u 4 16 r rr 8If r if-r - r- r-0r 1 x'9 0E ® 4 K 1 1 q 5R se i PE11),' CO I--1 lirl■1 dh , L— • ' . _� pc) 6...: 4) 0ilEff -g ag O o p m [i I c O 0 O 6130 ra I Ig'q't 1112 I fit n' I „P gt. 2,mm \ ? I 1 1, i g s tt tf , k ..1 E rt, preo m r-0, ram• _ECr ar r v O m3 'm t o 6 i p §u i ,r-c r r-r r� 14'-r IS-c W+ a i> E (1D ) Engle Residence I ? ,.- ,,,'\, Lot 23, Palisades Point5 i 1 ' k 11321 North Charoleau Drive ...lb, 4 robi�.tti boo Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 �67 eaM rN.r rood,wNe 112,tuewn,orh:one 85716 Project#04_J7 520�323-3C70 www.robin.4harohM.e4.oem lhlr Dm.Y.Ian w.trr.nrd or rrrew*and la er trot woody of Robinette Amt ..,Ino. lhlo dre..re may nod M reprodraed or nwoAatbrr hereof trod without u..rMrn oorerr.on.roan..AM...M. 0 0 ..j.---,717,57."Lf:::--'77,--,, -..„ ‘„... 0 • ._. ---. ti . _____. 0 ., o __.. ------ - witestama....., �� •________ ______________________________. -----_ ..„... _ ...._ • _u �,iw4�aJuillwsw�ral�A� aJi��w� `' `�c�� ��� i _. '" ____..., , ' ���—'0. iwiwfii� iwiwiwyiw�wi rV Mri�tuw!niw �tii1 111 Ni 1 .1,-- ,, , ______________ „..,.., El Ni 11 r-0 r� IDroll ,0,. I • . .,.,...„. - , — ____ Vhp4n__ __ ° __ ____ il immiminnAlpil* — iiimmunimmr 0 _._...____.. • o • o °- West v8„ _ 1,_a» EXTERIOR FINISH NOTE a BUILDINGCement st�,c ELEVATION co. 2x6 Wood studs " w� 1. Typical Exterior Wall Construction: 2x6 wood studs KEY NOTES rigid insulation and 3—coat 60. stucco h wall sheathing, 1" system applied with smooth troweled finish. 16" O.C. with double top plate and treated sill Clay Tile Roof: plate. Finish exterior with cement stucco system Clay tile roof mortar set in medium 'chinked' style OCBO #3899) over 1" rigid insulation over 3/8" over (2) 40 lb. felts — Tile color/style: selected b a OSB wall sheathing. Finish interior with 5-1/2" Owner. Y batt insulation and 1/2" Gypsum Wallboard. Concrete Trim: 2. Metal Clad Wood frame windows with double pane insulated glazing. by Owner. 3. Insulated steel sectional garage door. Concrete designs in color and selectedfinish Windows: 4. Finish Grade. 5. Spark arrestor tofh nn,,,,,..4 �i,—,.......,_, __ 1. The gross area of this subdivision is $6.3 acres. 2. The owner covenants that there will be no further subdividing or lot splitting without the written approval of the Board of Supervisors. 3. The basis of bearing for this subdivision is the east-west center of the section line of Section 6, said line also being the centerline of Palisades Road as shown on Palisades Mouth Subdivision, book 43, Page 90 of Maps and Plats, Pima County, Arizona. 4. Total miles of new private streets is 1.37 miles. 5. Area calculations for Common Area: Common Area A 16,042 Square Feet. (Landscape, s ignage and entry feature) Common Area 314,027 Square Feet. (Landscape, s ignage and entry feature) Common Area C 2.4• Acres (Recreation and access by homeowners) Common Area D - Private Streets 6. Administrative Control Notes for this subdivision are available at Pima County Development Services, Co12-93--16. RESTRICTIVE NOTES 410 Lots 1 thru 66 may be subject to the Hillside Development Overlay Zone as determined by review of a building site slop analysis by the Department of Transportation and Flood Control District, and any development to be placed thereon shall be shown to conform to the requirements of the Hillside Development Overlay Zone prior to the issuance of any building permits. 2. This subdivision is subject to those CCilt's recorded in Docket 9013 at Page 519. 3. This subdivision is subject to Blanket Easement recorded in Book 72 of Miscellaneous Records at Page 326 (for communications) . 411 The owners of Lots 12, 13, 62 and 63 shall keep the area within the sewer easement free from any obstruction or encroachment, including walls or fences. ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL NOTES For Palisades Point Co12-93-16 4 OFF PLAT ''ES . 4 RESTRICTIVE NOTES: 1. Existing zoning is SR, conditionally approved zoning is CR-1. 2. Minimum lot size is 43,560 square feet. 3. Approval of this plat does not affirm, certify, or approve any land division that may be contrary to state law, nor does it certify the existence or compliance with any deed restrictions or easements. 4. Special Zoning Conditions A. Landscaping shall consist of low water use and low pollen producing vegetation. B. A preservation study and plan shall be prepared. The developer shall covenant to preserve or relocate on-site cacti and trees as recommended by the plan. C. An on-the-ground archeological survey and cultural mitigation plan is being prepared for any identified archeological site. D. This plat will conform to the development plan for Co- 09-90-24 . Dedication of the natural areas and restriction of grading as outlined on page 27 of the Site Analysis will be provided in accordance with Zoning Chapter 18.61. E. There shall be no more than one lot per gross acre as required by Section 18.21.060E of the Zoning Code. F. Grading shall be limited to that necessary for roads, driveways and individual building pads. G. This CR-i subdivision and lot layout has been approved by the Board of Supervisors for lot reduction option 18.21.060. The Development Plan approved by the Board of Supervisors provided the dedication of natural areas in conformance with 18.09.05. 5. The Lot Reduction Option is being used on this plat in accordance with Section 18.09.050. 411 Every new structure, building, fill, excavation, or development located within the regulatory floodplain or erosion hazard area on Lots #12, #13, #16 thru #29, #48 thru #52, #61 thru #66, shall require a floodplain use permit prior to the issuance of any permits by the zoning inspector. 7 . The area within the 100-year floodprone limits represents an area which is subject to flooding from the regulatory flood event . All land within this delineated floodprone area shall be restricted to uses that are compatible with the current Floodplain and Erosion Hazard Management Ordinance. 8 . This plat and subsequent lot development is subject to all requirements and conditions outlined in the Landscape and Preservation Plan prepared by Winters & Associates . 9 . Assurances will not be released until utility installations across HDZ natural areas have been revegetated to resemble natural species and densities . 10 . This plat is subject to the Board of Supervisors rezoning conditions as found within case number Co9-90-24 as approved on 9-04-90 and as amended on 12-17-91 . GENERAL NOTES 1 . The use of this project is Detached Residential . 2 . The water company that will service this subdivision is Canada Hills Water Company. 3 . The base flood peak discharges and their respective contributing drainage areas are provided by the owner for informational purposes only. � r NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE ORO VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT In accordance with Sec. 21.6.H of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised and Arizona Revised Statutes Sec. 9-462.06, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Oro Valley Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, July 25, 2006, commencing at or after 3:00 p.m. The meeting will be held at the Oro Valley Town Hall, 11000 N. La Canada Drive and the subject matter will be as further described below: OV10-06-09: Robinette Architects, Inc. representing Frank and Mary Engle, request a variance from the 18' building height, up to 23', when measured from natural grade on a custom graded lot with a greater than 6% slope. Subject property: (parcel #220-07-0530) located at 11321 N. Charoleau Drive, Oro Valley, AZ, 85737. Site plans are available for review during normal business hours at the Oro Valley Town Hall, Development Service Center. Persons interested may appear in person, by agent or attorney, and the petitioners must appear or be represented. Any person seeking further information on this request for a variance may contact Patty Hayes 229-4819 or e-mail: phayes@orovalley.net. a( Q: Sarah More,FAICP Planning and Zoning Administrator Posted: 7-6-06 Time: 3:30 p.m. By: sg AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF ARIZONA ) ss. COUNTY OF PIMA ) Audrey Smith, being first duly sworn, deposes and says that (s)he is the Legal Advertising Manager of THE DAILY TERRITORIAL, a daily newspaper printed and published in the County of Pima, State of Arizona, and of general circulation in the City of Tucson, County of Pima, State of Arizona and elsewhere, and the hereto attached: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ORO VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT JULY 25, 2006 @ 3:00PM OV10-06-09 - SUBJECT PARCEL 220-07-0530 was printed and published correctly in the regular and entire issue of said THE DAILY TERRITORIAL for 1 issues; that was first made on the 11th day of July 2006 and the last publication thereof was made on the 11th day of July 2006 ; that said publication was made on each of the following dates, to-wit: 07/11/06 at the Request of: Town of Oro Valley Itt..:t F ate'.. �� 'fi�+s+§. 1111�`� f�n�' i (-1 14.,, (—) . '.i, 'ir. 11:: - . —.. - ' by \ AJ\i'___5,.x, ,. ,\.,k-. ; / , Legal Advertising Manager Subscribed and sworn ,b'efoo e e'is 11th day of July 2006 . >7-,. JAMIE C. MACIAS �C (\- �� ��\ ,, ) r� u�:u )1, Notary'PLIbli -Arizona k. t of`ry Public in and for the County of Pima, State of Arizona � :: / Pima ..cUrkk�� .``"' � Expires 02/04/00 M y y commission expires: ` ��� NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFOFItTHE A. ORO VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT In accordance with Sec.21.6.H of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised and Arizona Revised Statutes Sec. 9-462.06, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Oro Valley Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing on Tuesday,July 25,2006,commencing at or after 3:00 p.m.The meeting will be held at the Oro Valley Town Hall, 11000 N. La Canada Drive and the subject matter will be as further described below: OV10-06-09:,Robinette Architects, Inc. representing Frank and Mary Engle, request a variance from the 18'building height,up to 23',when measured from natural grade on a custom graded lot with a greater than 6%slope. Subject property:(parcel #220-07-0530) located at 11321 N. Charoleau Drive, Oro Valley, AZ, 85737, Site plans are available for review dur- ing normal business hours at the Oro Valley Town Hall,Development Service Center. Persons interested may appear in person,by agent or attorney,and the petitioners must appear or be repre- sented.Any person seeking further in- formation on this request for a variance may contact Patty Hayes 229-4819 or e-mail:phayes@orovalley.net. REQ: Sarah More,FAICP Plan- ning and Zoning Administrator PUBLISH:The Daily Territorial July 11,2006 hrjul25ov10-06-09 a.s NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE ORO VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT In accordance with Sec.21.6.H of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised and Arizona Revised Statutes Sec.9-462.06, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Oro Valley Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing on Tuesday,July 25,2006, commencing at or after 3:00 p.m.The meeting will be held at the Oro Valley Town Hall,11000 N.La Canada Drive and the subject matter will be as further described below: OV10-06-09: Robinette Architects, Inc. representing Frank and Mary Engle, request a variance from the 18' building height,up to 23',when measured from natural grade on a custom graded lot with a greater than 6%slope. Subject property:(parcel#220-07-0530)located at 11321 N.Charoleau Drive,Oro Valley,AZ,85737. Site plans are available for review during normal business hours at the Oro Valley Town Hall, Development Service Center. Persons interested may appear in person,by agent or attorney,and the petitioners must appear or be represented. Any person seeking further information on this request for a variance may contact Patty Hayes 229-4819 or e-mail:phayes@orovalley.net. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE ORO VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT In accordance with Sec.21.6.H of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised and Arizona Revised Statutes Sec.9-462.06, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Oro Valley Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing on Tuesday,July 25,2006, commencing at or after 3:00 p.m.The meeting will be held at the Oro Valley Town Hall,11000 N.La Canada Drive and the subject matter will be as further described below: OV10-06-09: Robinette Architects, Inc. representing Frank and Mary Engle, request a variance from the 18' building height,up to 23',when measured from natural grade on a custom graded lot with a greater than 6%slope. Subject property:(parcel#220-07-0530)located at 11321 N.Charoleau Drive,Oro Valley,AZ,85737. Site plans are available for review during normal business hours at the Oro Valley Town Hall, Development Service Center. Persons interested may appear in person,by agent or attorney,and the petitioners must appear or be represented.Any person seeking further information on this request for a variance may contact Patty Hayes 229-4819 or e-mail:phayes@orovalley.net. QS) <ci4 c REQUEST FOR RECORDS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES `� �� ' ' 16. 116. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA F�V��'DT 19��� Phone (520) 229-4800 Fax (520) 742-1022 ryg Name ' , 'O /� Date: -��� Business: Telephone:Address: / V() Ys737 Item(s) requested: 4✓1 c ��12 -o '7 7 c:3C� -�� ( ? '4) Ye Pi' 4i7 -' �{ , ii,�c� ,� s if known: NOTE: Copy charge is $.15 per 8 1/2"x 11"page. �' Large copies are $1.00 per page. Signature PLEASE COMPLETE IF COPIES ARE TO BE USED FOR A COMMERCIAL PURPOSE. [ ] These reproductions of public records will be used for the following commercial purpose: Signature ***Commercial purpose means the use of a public record for the purpose of sale or resale or for the purpose of producing a document containing all or part of the copy, printout or photograph for sale or the obtaining of names and addresses from such public records for the purpose of solicitation or the sale of such names and addresses to another for the purpose of solicitation or for any purpose in which the purchaser can reasonably anticipate the receipt of monetary gain from the direct or indirect use of such public record. Commercial purpose does not mean the use of a public record as evidence or as research for evidence in an action in a judicial or quasi-judicial body of this state or a political subdivision of this state. (Arizona Revised Statute 39-121-03.D) (NOTE: There is a 50 cents charged per page for documents used for commercial purposes.) *TO BE COMPLETED BY TOWN OF ORO VALLEY STAFF* DATE/TIME REQUEST RECEIVED: (AM I PM) STAFF: 4.6ki DATE/TIME REQUEST COMPLETED: 1, /e 360 (AM I K'W COPY COSTS: F:\Forms\Request for Records MINUTES ORO VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT REGULAR SESSION JULY 25,2006 ORO VALLEY TOWN HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11,000 N.LA CANADA DRIVE CALL TO ORDER: at or after 3:00 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Andy Martin, Chair Bart Schannep, Vice Chair Paul Parisi, Member Colleen Kessler, Member John Hickey, Member MINUTES: A motion was made by Member Kessler to approve the minutes of May 23, 2006. Member Hickey seconded the motion. The motion carried, 5-0. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. CASE NO. OV10-06-08: Scott Leska, Engineering and Design Assoc., representing Lodestone Builders, Inc., request for a variance from the required: (1) 30' setback from the north property line for lot 4 (eastern most building) to 15'; and (2) 30' setback for lot 2 (northwest building) to 22' at the northwest corner of the lot. Subject property is zoned R-S, and is adjacent to R1-36 to the north and northwest boundaries, (Parcel 225-11-1880) located on North Oracle Road, just south of Calle Concordia, Oro Valley, AZ 85704. Chair Martin swore in the witness. Jack Cook, a representative for the applicant reported that the nature of the request was to allow a setback variance that would allow the required setback of 30 feet on the northwest edge of Lot 2, and the north property line of Lot 4 to be reduced to 22 feet and 15 feet respectively. He explained that this request was required due to the narrow size and shape of the parcel, and the ability to develop the lot that is suitable to the end user. He reviewed the site using the overhead projector. In answer to a question from Member Hickey, Jack Cook explained that there had been some consideration to place the driveway on the north to avoid moving vegetation. He explained that after reviewing the concept with staff, there was concern that the residents in the area would have a road in front and behind them. 07 25 06 Board of Adjustment 2 Minutes Zoning Inspector Patty Hayes reviewed the report. She explained that the specific request was to reduce setbacks on the north and northwestern property line for a four-lot townhouse subdivision in an R-S zoned parcel. She reported that the applicant has requested the 30 foot setback, required abutting R-1 districts, be reduced to 15 foot and 22 foot. Staff finding of facts: • Current R-S zoning allows the proposed townhouse use per R-4 regulations. • The applicant submitted a conceptual site plan to the Development Review Committee (DRC) on April 28, 2006 • All variance requests are for the north and northwestern property line only. • The applicant states they contacted the neighborhood to the south for a shared access thus possibly reducing the need for a variance, but was denied by the neighborhood. • The applicant indicates that the proposed townhouses will be one story. • The General Plan designation for this parcel is NCO,Neighborhood Commercial/Office. However, the underlying R-S zoning prevails over General Plan Designation. The proposed use is also compatible with the existing surrounding residential subdivisions. In summary, the proposed townhouses are allowed in the R-S district, meet other zoning code requirements, and are supported by staff. Vice Chair Schannep stated that after reviewing the site, he did not find anything peculiar about the property but believed the setbacks were dictating how the homes would be positioned. Chair Martin opened the public hearing and swore in the witnesses that were intending to testify. Jim Kriegh, 40 East Calle Concordia, stated that the variance request was reasonable as long as the project was consistent with the proposal submitted. Bill Adler, 10720 North Eagle Eye Place, stated that the hardship was not created by the property but by post density. He explained that the property owner was having difficulty because he was proposing more development than the land space allowed. Therefore, he believed the proposed project was creating the hardship and not the land. Steve Langford, 9140 North Shadow Mt. Drive, read from a letter submitted June 27, 2006 that addressed his objection in the strongest possible terms to any change to proscribed setbacks on the South, West, and North sides of the property in question. The document also revealed that the Langfords' had no objection at all to the setback variance that the Board might deem permissible on the East side of the property, along Oracle Road. He proceeded to read from the document explaining his opposition to the variance request. (See attached) Chair Martin closed the public hearing. MOTION: Member Hickey moved to DENY Case No. OV10-06-08, a request for variance to: 1. Reduce the 30 foot setback from the north property line for lot 4 (eastern most building) to 15 feet. 2. Reduce the 30 foot setback from the northwestern property line for lot 2 (northwest building)to 22 feet. Member Hickey explained that he could not find anything special about the lot and believed a number of things could be built on the site. He added that there were no special circumstances 07 25 06 Board of Adjustment 3 Minutes on the property other than those that were self imposed. He explained that the applicant's substantial property rights could be enjoyed using other options and did not believe Criteria 1, 3 and 5 had been met. Roll Call Vote Vice Chair Schannep—aye Member Parisi—aye Member Kessler—aye Member Kessler—aye Chair Martin—Nay Motion carried to DENY Case No. OV10-06 08, 4-1, with Chair Martin opposed. 2. CASE NO. OV10-06-07 Copper Stone Development LLC, request for variance from the allowed building height of 25', to allow 34' in height in an R-S zone. Subject property: (parcels 225-11-1970; 225-11-1980; 225-11-1990) located on the west side of Oracle, between Hardy and Calle Concordia, Oro Valley, AZ 85704. Chair Martin swore in the witness. Carl Winter, the Planning Consultant for Copperstone Development, explained that the request for a variance from 25 feet building height (table 23-2A)to 34 feet building height. He used the overhead projector to review the site plan. Dick Green, the architect for the project reviewed the site's elevation and explained that the company felt it was very important that the existing terrain remained in tact. He used the overhead projector to review certain aspects of the project such as the spacing between floors, drainage, lighting, screening,parking and the parapet. There was discussion regarding the placement of the air conditioning unit and alternatives for the location of the unit; and the height of the proposed building, and what type of offices would be opening in the building. Zoning Inspector Patty Hayes reported that the specific request was to increase the building height from the allowed 25 feet in an R-S zone to 34 feet. She added that the applicant proposes to build two office building that would each be two stories. Staff finding of facts: • Current R-S zoning allows a 25 foot building height which may be limited by the Development Review Board and Town Council to one story when abutting an R1 district per OVZCR section 23.7.C.4 • The applicant submitted a concept plan to the Development Review Board(DRB) for the June 13, 2006 meeting for guidance regarding the one story vs. two story issue. • The DRB supported allowing the two story building. • The applicant states they contacted neighbors regarding the height variance. • The apartments abutting the south property line are two stories. 07 25 06 Board of Adjustment 4 Minutes • The apartments abutting the north property line are three stories. The first floor is partially at basement level. • The western property line abuts 20 feet alley and single family single story subdivision. • The site slopes down more than 20 feet for Oracle Road to the western property line. • The applicant proposes to build the buildings with a finished floor elevation 16 feet below Oracle Road and terrace the parking. • An increase in building height does not increase the allowable development FAR. • The General Plan designation for this parcel is NCO,Neighborhood Commercial/Office and HDR, high density residential. However,the underlying R-S zoning prevails over General Plan designation. The proposed use is also compatible with the existing surrounding properties. • In summary, the proposed two story office complex is allowed in the R-S district, meeting other zoning code requirements, and are supported by staff. In conclusion, staff analysis of the variance to allow the proposed office development located on Oracle Road was that the required findings are met. In particular,the proposed two-story office development will fit into and should not have a detrimental effect on the surrounding area. Chair Martin opened the public hearing and swore in the witnesses that were intending to testify. Sue Brinley, 9020 North Shadow Mountain Drive, stated that Mr. Winters' and the architect had been very accommodating, however, after the June 27th meeting she was distressed after receiving a letter identifying the request for variance would be changed from 25 feet to 34 feet. She stated that she had concerns because there was no guarantee other changes would not be made. She explained that there could be more of a compromise made regarding the height of the building and hoped the drainage would not be a problem in the area. Chair Martin closed the public hearing. Mr. Winter stated that the drainage was required to meet the code standards. MOTION: Member Schannep moved to APPROVE Case No. OV 10-06-07, a request for variance to include the lighting and parapet height relocation as negotiated with the neighbor. Member Parisi seconded the motion. Discussion: Member Hickey stated that he could not see any circumstances or conditions on the property that would preclude constructing 40 thousand square foot of anything,therefore believes Criteria#1 had been met. He expressed concern with the height being driven by the engineer as well as the placement of the air conditioning unit. Vice Chair Schannep supported the motion and stated that he was very sensitive to the property rights of the neighbors and appreciated the applicant's working with the community so diligently. He suggested that by repositioning the parapets walls on an angle could help preserve the views of the mountain. 07 25 06 Board of Adjustment 5 Minutes Chair Martin explained that the topography in Oro Valley has been an issue in a number of cases, but in this case all 5 criteria had been satisfied. He stated that to enjoy property rights he believed that visibility would constitute as a component. Member Kessler stated that she supports the motion because the proposed structure would be compatible with the surrounding building, so for continuity it would be sensible to have the building approximately the same height as the buildings to the north and south. She agreed that the criteria had been met. Roll Call Vote Vice Chair—aye Member Parisi—aye Member Kessler—aye Member Hickey—nay Chair Martin—aye Motion carried, 4-1, with Member Hickey opposed. Chair Martin recessed the meeting at 4:20 p.m. The meeting resumed at 4:26 p.m. 3. CASE NO. OV10-06-09 Robinette Architects,Inc. representing Frank and Mary Engle, request a variance from the required 18' building height, up to 23',when measured from natural grade on a custom graded lot with a greater than 6% slope. Subject property: (parcel#220-07-0530) located at 11321 N. Charoleau Drive, Oro Valley, AZ 85737, in the Palisades Point subdivision. Lee Pettit, representing the Engles explained that the expiration of the pre-annexation agreement for Palisades Point will prevent this project from being developed to the standard of the existing neighborhood and adjacent properties, specifically with regard to allowable building height. He reported that the current zoning requirements would not allow this project to blend with the existing neighborhood context and would severely limit the views from the property, and would have a negative impact on the property value. He explained that only a very small portion of the project exceeded the current 18 feet-0 inches building height requirement, whereas the entire project was in conformance with the original development standards. He reported that the Oro Valley Development Review Board and the subdivision previously approved a 2-story version of the project, which had a greater overall building height than what was currently being proposed. He added that the project had not been through the permitting process and that the request would be to obtain a variance from 18 feet-0 inches to 22 feet-0 inches maximum building height. In answer to a question from Member Kessler, Lee Pettit reported that the majority of the community was developed and the existing homes were built under the old zoning rule requirements. Senior Zoning Inspector Dee Widero explained that the Engles were requesting approval to build a home on a custom graded lot with an average cross slop greater than 6 %per cent. She reported that the proposed height overall was 15 feet 6 inches in height, with the foyer being visually the highest point at 17 feet 9 inches in height on a 6 inch foundation. She explained that the southwest portion of the home, ranges from 11 feet to 14 feet in actual height; with an 07 25 06 Board of Adjustment 6 Minutes allowed height of 18 feet; adding the amount of full ranging from 8 feet 5 inches to 10 feet inches; requiring a height variance from 3 feet 5 inches to 4 feet 5 inches because the natural grade at certain points of the building was significantly lower than that of other parts of the building site. She reported that the amount of fill dirt accounts for a portion of the allowable building height. Staff finding of facts: • Lot 23 has a 12% slope under the house pad. • The building area of lot 23 is restricted by slope, only driveways are allowed in the slope easement. • The building height varies from 7 feet 6 inches to 15 feet 6 inches with the foyer being 17 feet 9 inches in height. • The section of house in question is 11 feet to 14 feet from finished floor, 11 feet 6 inches & 14 feet 6 inches from finished grade, but exceeds the 18 feet from natural grade. • The owner has been working on the design of their home for over two years. Coming up against some hurdles, one of which is expiration of the annexation agreement. In Pima County the height limit for CR-1 is 34 feet, with a cut and fill of 15 feet. Oro Valley R1- 36, 18 feet maximum height and cut and fill of 6 feet. In answer to a question from Member Hickey, Sarah More explained that it was possible that the variance would be limited only to the information currently presented to the Board. Therefore, if there was a change in the design plan such as adding an additional room in the future, and it didn't meet the height requirement,the applicant would be required to apply for another variance. Chair Martin opened the public hearing and swore in the witness that was intending to testify. Brady Buckely, 11526 North Civano Place, a representative of the home owners association reported that the association was in favor of the request and the design of the home had met the association's requirements. MOTION: Member Hickey moved to APPROVE Case No. OV 10-06-09, a request to exceed the 18 foot building height up to 4 feet 6 inches when measuring building height from existing grade on a greater than 6 % slope. Member Parisi seconded the motion. Discussion: Member Hickey reported that after viewing the site he believed it was a tough lot to build on because of the flood plain and the way the property peeked upward. He explained that the 23 feet would be the minimum the applicant needed to construct the building. He stated that all 5 criteria had been met, especially the fact that it was a unique piece of property. Chair Martin agreed and pointed out the fact that the area in question was lower than the overall height of the home. Roll Call Vote Vice Chair Schannep—aye Member Parisi—aye Member Kessler—aye Member Hickey—aye 07 25 06 Board of Adjustment 7 Minutes Chair Martin—aye Motion carried, 5-0. 4. CASE NO. Randy and Karen Barbera, request a variance from the required 40' rear yard setback to 8', in the Monte Del Oro subdivision. Subject property: (parcel#224-27-1990) located at 11113 N. Guava Drive, Oro Valley,AZ 85737. Chair Martin swore in the witness. Karen Barbera explained that the request for a variance on the rear setback from the existing 20 feet to 8 feet to construct an additional 12 feet onto the rear the existing home. She reported that revision would allow for the enlargement of an existing children's bathroom and closet to accommodate her growing family. Senior Zoning Inspector Dee Widero explained that the Barberas were requesting to encroach into the required 40 feet rear yard setback, for a 12 feet addition to enlarge one of the bathrooms and a closet. She explained that the home was built in 1991, under R1-43 zoning regulations however, it was built at a 30 feet setback to the rear as opposed to the 40 feet required. She added that the current 30 feet setback minus the proposed 12 feet addition, would leave an 18 feet set back from the rear property line. She reported that the Barberas applied for a variance in 2003 to encroach into the side yard to construct a pool and that request was denied. She added that since that time the applicant has applied; received approval and completed a garage extension and modifications; interior modification; retaining walls and archways and pool permit. Staff finding of fact: • Due to the topographic constraints of this site, the location and design of the home when built, the proposed addition/remodel will lie 12 feet from the rear property line if approved. • The home was originally built in 1991; the applicant bought their home in 2002. • The applicant is proposing to reduce the rear yard setback from the required 40 feet to 12 feet. Chair Martin opened the public hearing. There being no speakers the public hearing was closed. MOTION: Member Hickey moved to approve Case No. OV 10-06-10, a request to reduce the rear setback for the addition only to 18 feet from the property line, in order to enlarge the bathroom and closet. Member Kessler seconded the motion. Discussion: Vice Chair Schannep stated that he had concerns with the variance approval and recalled that he had ruled on the home before and was sympathetic to the fact that the family was growing. But, he believed the situation was purely caused by the families needs and not by the home. Chair Martin agreed and stated he did not believe the 5 criteria had been met. He said there was no valid reason presented for the approval of the variance other than need. 07 25 06 Board of Adjustment 8 Minutes Member Hickey explained that this property had a substantially unique topography, and in his opinion, there wasn't much else that would be doable with the property, therefore all 5 criteria had been met because the property was unique. In answer to a question from Member Parisi, Patty Hayes explained that a detached accessory structure would be allowed 5 feet from the property line. Member Kessler stated that there were some topography issues with the property and the applicant was certainly entitled to their property rights, therefore agreed with the motion. Roll Call Vote Vice Chair Schannep—nay Member Kessler—nay Member Parisi—nay Member Hickey—aye Chair Martin—nay Motion failed 1-4, with Member Hickey was in favor. 5. Planning and Zoning Update No report. Vice'Chair Schannep requested that the section of the staff report labeled "Conclusion"be agendized for discussion at the next regular meeting. ADJOURNMENT A motion was made by Vice Chair Schannep, and seconded by Member Kessler to adjourn the meeting at 5:16 p.m. Motion carried, 5-0. Respectfully submitted, Linda Hersha, Office Specialist I D.,Pv,LEY qiy/�o TOWN OF ORO VALLEY o� 2-� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 6) Planning and Zoning•Building Safety w. 11000 N.La Canada Drive,Oro Valley,AZ 85737•(520)229-4800•Fax(520)742-1022 Oro Valley Public Library 1305 W.Naranja Drive,Oro Valley,AZ 85737•(520)229-5300•Fax(520)229-5319 A Parks and Recreation A _.. lx 680 W.Calle Concordia,Oro Valley,AZ 85737•(520)229-5050•Fax(520)797-2202 °UNDED 1g� July 26, 2006 Robinette Architects, Inc. Lee Pettit 1670 E. River Road, #112 Tucson, AZ 85718 RE: Case No. OV10-06-09 Parcels 220-07-0530, request for variance from the allowed building height of 18' to allow 23'. Dear Mr. Pettit, At their regular meeting of July 25, 2006, the Board of Adjustment voted to approve your variance request. For additional information on your case file,please contact the Clerks office, to receive a copy of the minutes from this meeting. Linda Hersha, will be happy to assist you 229- 4744 or E-mail: lhersha@orovalley.net. Sincerely, r f r ,ki,,_ C.(._ C,LILLQ-A...R, Dee Widero Senior Zoning Inspector Town of Oro Valley C: File www.townoforovalley.com