Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCO099843 EXPIRATION DATE: 9'4-U Co9-98-43 may. Co 12- TITLE: WONG - ORACLE ROADAREZONING REZONING FROM SR, TO TR; TOTAL ACRES: 1.31; BASE MAP 116; DIST 1. LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ORACLE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 1/4 MILE SOUTH OF MAGEE ROAD. . CROSS REF: Co7-89-2 PIMA COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Co7-98-05 WONG - ORACLE ROAD OWNER: AGENT: WALTER AND JANE WONG, TRUSTEES DONA LAIDLAW AND ASSOCIATES 5437 EAST THIRD STREET (DON LAIDLLAW) TUCSON, AZ 85711 1735 EAST FORT LOWELL ROAD,. #10 PHONE: 327-2309 TUCSON, AZ 85719 PHONE: 322-5339 PLANNER: FEE PAID IN FULL, RECEIVED DATEfi'1' q BY 4' SITE ANALYSIS COMPLETE') YES [J NO []N/A APPLICANT NOTIFIED DATES/2. /4 BY/46 PROPERTY OWNERS MEETING INVITATION REC'DE DATE BY TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR P/Z: T SECRETARY: FILE PREPARED, CASE LOGGED IN DATE! ?ll /(BY- 7 MAP TRANSMITTAL SENT TO OTHER AGENCIES DATE BY—_ COMPUTER LISTING PREPARED, LABELS ORDERED. . . DATE S•Z4.9 1 DRAFTER: ZONING MAP COMPLETED DATE S ZG• 4 BY)rma-__ ADVERTISING/POSTING: AD DELIVERED TO PAPER _ NOTIFICATION LETTERS SENT — PROPERTY POSTED AFF'T IN FILE ACTION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONIN COMMISSION,: DAT ACT I ON V�'' ,GTry- - `1, __ '"A� — DATE ACTION ACTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: DATE((0 `? ACTION is,ei/ L L1 o 0�) 4( re rnfrb,.& ,cl CF' 44:17;�1s• — DATE ACTION: ;` 's q -AK , i !N , i 4) lJ ORDINANCE MAP DRAWN: BY: ORDINANCE SIGNED: OTHER BOARD ACTIONS: DATE ACTION — DATE ACTION DATE ACTION DATE ACTION DATE ACTION DATE ACTION — CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE SIGNED: _ BY CASE CLOSED PER _ DATE _ BY apz25:278:4/92 PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT--PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 14 , 1998 PUBLIC HEARING: April 29, 1998 CASE: Co7-98-05 Wong - Oracle Road LOCATION: East side of Oracle Road, 1000 feet south of Magee Road, in section 36 of T12S, R13E. SUBREGION: Catalina Foothills DISTRICT: 1 N REQUEST: Minor Revision to the Pima MAGEE RD County Comprehensive Plan from Low Intensity Urban-1 .2 (LIU-1 . 2) to Medium/High Intensity Urban (MHIU) . (2 .7 acres) W 1-4 OWNERSHIP: Walter & Jane Wong; and Fred & Emily Wolf . 0 //,./ 1 on g STATED REASON: "Frontagehigh ADT 7 /ac highway; abuts back side of tire repair 7-/ and shopping center with no screening or buffer; shopping center and other future commercial across highway; office uses to south; not suitable for any type of residential use . " EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant EXISTING ZONING: Suburban Ranch (SR) (5-) L i SURROUNDING LAND USE DESIGNATIONS: North: Community Activity Center (CAC) f South: Medium/High Intensity Urban (MHIU) Z� East: Low Intensity Urban-1 . 2 (LIU-1 . 2) West: Community Activity Center (CAC) SURROUNDING ZONING (CONDITIONAL ZONING) : North: CB-1 5?j' South: TR Co7-98-05 1 P&Z Commission Hear" 4/13/ East: CR-1 West: CB-1 SURROUNDING LAND USE: North: Shopping center and tire store South: Office East: Single family residential West: Shopping center and vacant FLOOD CONTROL COMMENTS : The area of the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment is within the Riverside Terrace Basin Management Plan, portions of which can be designated as a Critical or Balanced basin. The basin designation will be determined by staff during any rezoning of the subject property. There are no federally mapped floodplains in the area. However, the subject property is bisected by a wash running from east to west that carries an estimated runoff of approximately 1, 320 cubic feet per second (cfs) during a 100-year event . The majority of the water from the wash (approximately 800 cfs) . enters a large box culvert under Oracle Road and then proceeds west . The remaining water (approximately 500 cfs) is detained behind Oracle Road with some of the water diverted south in a constructed drainageway. It was suggested in the Riverside Terrace Basin Management Plan that the area of the subject property could be a possible location for a detention/retention basin to help reduce peak flows downstream. However, the Flood Control District presently has no plans to implement such a detention/retention basin in this area. The wash and associated vegetation through the property are classified as Xeroriparian class C habitat and as such should be preserved. Preservation of the wash and riparian habitat could be a condition of rezoning should the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment be approved. It should be noted that any proposed medium to high intensity use of this property will likely require major alterations to the wash and its associated riparian habitat areas . TRANSPORTATION COMMENTS : The area of the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment is served by Oracle Road. Oracle Road is a paved, six-lane divided, State- maintained arterial with an existing traffic count of approximately 37, 000 average daily trips (ADT) and a roadway capacity estimated at approximately 52 , 000 ADT. Access to Oracle Road is controlled by the Arizona Department of Transportation. Co7-98-05 2 P&Z Commission Hearing 4/13/98 , • WASTEWATER COMMENTS : The nearest public sewer to which this parcel could connect is the 8-inch sewer line, M-555 , located on the east side of the parcel . Connection must be made at the location and in the manner specified by Wastewater Management at the time of review of the tentative plat or development plan. We have no objection to this Comprehensive Plan Amendment Minor Revision. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: This is a request for a minor revision to the Comprehensive Plan for a change from the Low Intensity Urban-1 . 2 (LIU-1 . 2) land use designation to Medium/High Intensity Urban (MHIU) . The amendment site is located on the east side of Oracle Road, about 1000 feet south of Magee Road. Two parcels are included in the amendment area. Both parcels are vacant, each measuring just over 1 . 3 acres in size, and are zoned Suburban Ranch (SR) . The request was initiated by the owners of the northern parcel (Walter and Jane Wong) . In a preliminary evaluation of the request, staff determined that the adjoining parcel to the south (owned by Fred and Emily Wolf) should also be included in the request due to its similarity to the Wong parcel . Therefore, staff expanded the amendment area to include the southern parcel and notified the owners of the additional parcel (Wolf) of this action. Minor Revision plan amendments Minor revisions to the Comprehensive Plan are permitted in order to remedy planning oversights, errors, and . incorrect land use designations . The zoning code provides guidance for determining whether a case may be made for a minor revision. One criterion for making such a determination is where the plan designation of the property does not adequately reflect existing or planned land uses along major arterials, thereby creating land use conflicts between low intensity and adjacent commercial uses . Such minor revisions are permitted to be filed at any time (instead of waiting for the application "window" from February through April) . However, such cases must still be heard by the Commission and the Board. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: A notification letter was sent to all owners of property within 300 feet of the requested plan amendment site . To date, no comments have been received. Co7-98-05 3 P&Z Commission Hearing 4/13/98 PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS AND RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends APPROVAL of this minor revision plan amendment request . The recommendation is based on the following reasons : 1 . It is staff ' s opinion that the designation of these properties in the 1992 plan as LIU-1 . 2 is an oversight that should be corrected in this minor revision hearing process . Both parcels are vacant, undersized SR lots that are not contained within a platted subdivision. The current designation of the parcels as LIU-1 .2 limits the future use to low density residential . Such designation does not recognize the existing and planned commercial uses adjacent to the amendment area to the north as well as across Oracle Road. Commercial shopping centers exist on both the southeast and southwest corners of Oracle and Magee . Directly across Oracle Road from the amendment area is a vacant commercial site with 20 acres of CB-1 and TR zoning (as part of the Co9-94-71/Watson Chevrolet rezoning) . These existing and zoned commercial areas are part of a larger Community Activity Center (CAC) that encompasses the Oracle/Magee intersection and is adjacent to the amendment area . To the south of the amendment area are existing professional office and personal service uses developed under TR zoning and the MHIU plan designation (the designation requested in this amendment) . 2 . The MHIU plan designation is an appropriate classification for the amendment area as it will provide a reasonable transition between Oracle Road (and the commercial uses along Oracle) and the existing CR-1 neighborhood to the east (Suffolk Hills subdivision) . The MHIU designation allows rezoning requests to TR zone, which permits non-residential uses such as professional offices . However, as noted in the Flood Control comments, any future development should preserve the existing wash and associated riparian habitat . Such factors would be addressed in the site analysis during the rezoning process . STAFF RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL Respectfully submitted, d ew S . Gunning Principal Planner Co7-98-05 4 P&Z Commission Hearing 4/13/98 Ile*" PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT JUDITH A. PATRICK PLANNING DIVISION PH: (520) 740-6800 Director 201 NORTH STONE AVENUE,SECOND FLOOR FAX: (520) 623-5411 TUCSON,ARIZONA 85701-1207 August 13, 1998 Walter and Janet Wong 5437 E. Third Street Tucson, AZ 85711 RE: Co7-98-05 WONG - ORACLE ROAD On June 16, 1998 the Pima County Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution No. 1998-110 and approved your request for a minor revision to the Pima County Comprehensive Plan from Low Intensity Urban-1.2 (LIU-1.2) to Medium/High Intensity Urban (MHIU). If you have any questions about your case, please call the Comprehensive Plan Section at 740-6800. For a certified copy of the official action of the Board when the minutes are completed, please call the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors at 740-8449. Sincere( , dy unning rin (pal Planner AG/jj c: Ted Payne, evelopment Review Division - Transportation and Flood Control Lucia Thurston, Development Review Division - Wastewater Management Don Laidlaw, 1735 East Ft. Lowell Road #10, Tucson, Az 85714 Co7-98-05 File Chrono File Book 18. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT - MINOR REVISION Co7-98-05 WONG-ORACLE ROAD Request of Don Laidlaw and Associates, representing Walter and Jane Wong, for a minor revision to the Pima County Comprehensive Plan from Low Intensity Urban-1.2 (LIU-1.2) to Medium/High Intensity Urban (MHIU) . The Pima County Development Services Department has expanded this request to include a similar adjacent parcel. The total acreage of the subject parcels is approximately 2.7 acres, and they are located on the east side of Oracle Road, about 1000 feet south of Magee Road, in Section 36 of T12S, R13E in the Catalina Foothills Sub region. On motion, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 9 - 0 (Commissioner Membrila was absent) to recommend APPROVAL. Staff recommends APPROVAL. (District 1) If approved, pass and adopt: RESOLUTION NO. 1998- 110 Jim Mazzocco, Planning Official, reported this is a minor revision request to the Comprehensive Plan from Low Intensity Urban (LIU-1.2) to Medium/High Intensity Urban (MHIU) which allows for TR Zoning. The property is 2.7 acres on the east side of Oracle Road south of Magee Road. Staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval. One protest letter was recently received for this request. Chairman Boyd inquired whether the applicant was present? No one appeared. On consideration, it was moved by Supervisor Carroll, seconded by Supervisor Grijalva, to close the public hearing and continue the matter to the Board of Supervisors regular meeting of June 16, 1998. David Dingeldine, Chief Civil Deputy County Attorney, advised the Board to keep the public hearing open if the matter is to be continued. Upon the vote being taken, the motion carried unanimously by a five to zero vote, to continue this matter to the Board of Supervisors regular meeting of June 16, 1998. 06-02-98 (29) of development which is truly affordable. -One acre housing in the range of 60 to 70 thousand dollars that allows moderate income people to buy. If this development is approved, the petitioner will provide streets with greater than normal right-of-ways. The project provides recreational areas and will not have any trouble complying with the Native Plant Ordinance. Supervisor Bronson inquired what the impacts were of the school district? Ms. Warner responded they were in the Marana School District and the site analysis says the needed capacity is available. The Chairman inquired whether anyone wished to be heard. No one appeared. On consideration, it was moved by Supervisor Eckstrom, seconded by Chairman Boyd, and carried by a three to two vote, Supervisors Bronson and Grijalva voting "Nay," to close the public hearing, to approve the petitioner's request subject to standard and special conditions. 36. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES:_ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS - MINOR REVISION The Board of Supervisors on June 2, 1998, continued the following to this date: Co7-98-05, WONG-ORACLE ROAD Request of Don Laidlaw and As ociate t representing Walter and Jane Wong, for a minor revision to the Pima County Comprehensive Plan from Low Intensity Urban-1.2 (LIU-1.2) to Medium/High Intensity Urban (MHIU) . The Pima County Development Services Department has expanded this request to include a similar adjacent parcel. The total acreage of the subject parcels is approximately 2.7 acres, and they are located on the east side of Oracle Road, about 1, 000 feet south of Magee Road, in Section 36 of T12S, R13E in the Catalina Foothills Sub region. On motion, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 9 - 0 (Commissioner Membrila was absent) to recommend APPROVAL. Staff recommends APPROVAL. (District 1) If approved, pass and adopt: RESOLUTION NO. 1998- 110 Jim Mazzocco, Planning Official, reported this case is a minor revision to the Comprehensive Plan and there has been no protest. Staff's evaluation is this was an oversight in the 1992 plan. 06-16-98 (45) The Chairman inquired whether anyone wished to be heard. No one appeared. On consideration, it was moved by Chairman Boyd, seconded by Supervisor Bronson, and unanimously carried by a five to zero vote, to close the public hearing, to approve the petitioner's request. 37. DEVELOPHENT SERVICES: REZONING Co9-97-41, WESTERN CONTINENTAL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP/SHINER - ORACLE ROAD REZONIN(a Request (Co9-97-41) of Western Continental Limited Partnership; James and Amy Shiner, represented by The WLB Group, for a rezoning of 2.34 acres from GR-1 (Rural Residential) to CB-2 (General Business) , located on the west side of Oracle Road, approximately 1/4 mile north of Pinal Street. The request lies within and conforms to the Pima County Comprehensive Plan. Co7-89-2. On motion, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 8 - 1 (Commissioner Hausman voted NAY; Commissioner Membrila was absent) to recommend APPROVAL, Staff recommends APPROVAL FOR CB-1, subject to Standard and Special Conditions. (District 3) "IF THE DECISION IS MADE TO APPROVE THE REZONING, THE FOLLOWING STANDARD AND SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED: Completion of the following requirements within five years from the date of rezoning approval by the Board of Supervisors: 1. Submittal of a development plan if determined necessary by the appropriate County agencies. 2. Recording of a covenant holding Pima County harmless in the event of flooding. 3. - Recording of the necessary development related covenants as determined appropriate by the various County agencies. 4. Provision of development related assurances as required by the appropriate agencies. 5. Prior to the preparation of the development related covenants and any required dedication, a title report (current to within 60 days) evidencing ownership of the property shall be submitted to the Department of Transportation, Real Property Division. 6. There shall be no further lot splitting or subdividing without the written approval of the Board of Supervisors. 7. . Transportation conditions: A. A maximum of two (2) access points to Oracle Road will be allowed. The center line of one and/or both approved access point(s) will be on or near the southern and northern boundaries of the subject property. Boundary access point(s) will be shared with the adjacent properties to the south and north. In addition the property owner(s) will provide for future internal site access and traffic circulation with the adjacent properties to the south and north. B. The location, design and numher of access points (maximum of two) to the subject property from the Tucson-Florence Highway (Oracle Road) will need written approval by the Arizona Department of Transportation before any plan approvals by Pima County. C. A written certification from the Arizona Department of Transportation stating satisfactory compliance of all its requirements for access to the Tucson-Florence Highway (Oracle 06-16-98 (46) RESOLUTION NO. 1998- no 1 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF 2 PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA RELATING TO PLANNING; 3 AMENDING THE PIMA COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE 4 PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR APPROXIMATELY 2.7 5 ACRES IN SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 13 6 EAST IN THE CATALINA FOOTHILLS SUB-REGION. 7 8 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF PIMA COUNTY, 9 ARIZONA AS FOLLOWS: 10 11 Section 1. The Pima County Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map, Catalina Foothills 12 sub-region, is hereby amended to change the planned land use classification for 13 approximately 2.7 acres, as referenced in Co7-98-05, located on the east side of Oracle 14 Road, about 1000 feet south of Magee Road, in Section 36, Township 12 South, Range 13 15 East, as shown on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this 16 reference, from Low Intensity Urban-1.2 (LIU-1.2) to Medium/High Intensity Urban 17 (MHIU). 18 19 Section 2. The various County officers and employees are authorized and directed to 20 perform all acts necessary to give effect to this resolution. 21 22 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of June , 1998, by the Board of 23 Supervisors of Pima County, Arizona. 24 25 ATTEST: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 26 27 28 29 Cl`rk, Board of Supervisors Chairman, Board o Supervisors 30 ` UN 1- 6 =998 31 32 APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED: :34: - �� 7 "„ 36 Deputy County Attorney - utive Secretary 37 P . i'1 g and Zoning mmission Page 1of1 PIMA COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (CO 7-89-2) 174 176A 175 I I 2 I 7 3 A 178 w 193 B 'I • 0' 40d 25 • C, i,!r6sIL ;76—+ N � l T its EEe,13e 2 T0.66,T9. 6 •0 iP,Z •" •i r - , t RI nR 5 CBI s,,2 �Sc�tJ r)i ID o �..�.__.. PSI.Z_A 41 0 LIU CB - I 40 Lti 2 BIB /.j..\ 3 4;r cr MI Q \ "all' 8IA s 4 I - b 6 a . Nis 0' be IT 4 3, 11-4-,A(q6" i I 0 2 30 3 % 4FMt si 04„,so 100 73 z.o• '7 Alic. qi, il CB - I A . •� ` 33 O � �,. till 0 i[O7Rfl $$ø ea ir 101 i 2 0 0 6 $11 SR DRIVE l� S SUFFOLK poi 102 7 1 goo d, -17 _ I it /f-�i- s6 - ;4--r;�� K.,/ : sit112 1 - S 1 Y 3 4 S 6 7 t Ile Area of proposed rezoning from -,.'' "`. `'. = o R . Notification area BASE MAP f I Cp Notes Tax codes "1�j• 1. c51 1 Date 5.z •.9/ File no. __ • 8. Drafter `7-N.--N4-- V>K1 .1 — ePAc-L� 1 REZONING PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION i ; i i;`I t: ill;• J/( • 23BZ Oi�`�\`� �ONCNETE N� ''�•' /II ii t i rilintr I 1115 4-rlil�1 1 firtt--4. . g . ,. . � � '`11RsQ24. FEET� ( � r , . nw..14.1 R W O .„ 4 , i .4 pas: ii --41100 0.., to _-.-t.-.---- - .•�i -.:702L 0iigg..; ` 1•= c- 10 �='�� 1'4 zs V _ ►EAT ` ��O Wtri , .'! -_0"%la` ,�f g L_ �._- - s.ry ice` �� 3(37 0 , LL'W.1"."&b-%°' ----Pr-ill • 0 !a: C 61C.171i- uses 1 � l„: II .-- -i`/: r 1 LL LANDSCAPING WILL BE XERISCAPE ' I t,� �� 9 1 5 4 . . EXHIBIT II—B. 1 (N) PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN, NORTH 1 Scale: 1" = 100' BUTTERFIELD1' Contour Intervals CROSSINGa DLAA . BUTTERFIELD CROSSING DESIGN&DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The following design and development standards are applied to the rezoning of parcels along Oracle Road for office use under the TR zoning district. In all cases they are equal to or more stringent than the zoning code. RESTRICTION THIS ' ZONING PROJECT CODE MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACKS • FROM ORACLE ROAD 60' 50' • FROM SUFFOLK DRIVE 40' 20' • FROM RESIDENTIAL LOTS 45' 25' • FROM OTHER USES 10' 7' MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT • ALONG ORACLE ROAD 24' 24' • ADJACENT TO CR-1 20' 34' MINIMUM BUFFERYARDS • ALONG ORACLE ROAD 10' 10' • ALONG SUFFOLK DRIVE 20' 10' • ADJACENT TO CR-1 25' 10' PERMITTED USES Uses will be limited to business and professional office functions defined as follows: accountant,architect,chiropractor, doctor,engineer,financier,lawyer,insurance broker,landscape architect,medical laboratory,mortgage broker,osteopath, photographer,planner,public stenographer,realtor,stock broker,title company,and other functions which do not require the stocking of goods for sale or the boarding and treating of animals. COMPATIBILITY Design of buildings and landscaping,parking and circulation,lighting and trash collection,and other features shall at all times focus on practicable means to maintain and enhance compatibility of the developed property with adjoining residential properties and the neighborhood at large. Dumpsters shall be fully screened by masonry enclosures and located as far as possible from residences. . MATERIALS,COLORS,TEXTURES External building surfaces shall be masonry or stucco. Exposed wood may be used for structural elements and trim. Visible roof surfaces shall be tile or non-reflective metal. Parapets,where used,shall be continuous around the building except where interrupted by other roof planes. Wall colors shall be southwestern,including a full range of earth tones, subdued greens and pale pastel sunset colors. Reflectivity shall not exceed 80 percent. Trim and accent colors with more vivid hues and gloss may be used sparingly. Stucco surfaces may be smooth or textured;wood surfaces should be rough for structural elements;glass walls are prohibited. FORM .Windows shall be recessed mutti-paned steel sash. The use of mirrored glass is prohibited. Some building corners may be rounded,external stairways may be utilized and wooden posts may be used to support porch overhangs or lintels. Extended wooden rafters and vigas may be used to add character as required. Spanish Colonial type masonry features with alcoves,bay windows with tile trim and carved wooden doors may be utilized as appropriate. LANDSCAPING All bufferyards will contain native plant materials in place,augmented as appropriate with trees transplanted on-site plus container grown shrubs and accents that are similar in appearance and drought tolerance to the on-site vegetation. All desert broom will be removed. Chain[ink fencing is prohibited. There will be no walls placed adjacent to CR-1 zoned properties,and only a 40 inch screen wall will be permitted along Suffolk Drive. -`----- LIGHTING r -<Z i ,)_ �.4f s`e, t Nighttime floodlighting of buildings and grounds is prohibited. Security lighting shall be directed away froo and /�,� � t. residential properties,and shall be arranged to illuminate parking and landscape surfaces,not the buildin mselves/ .r-. "Y‘_ Li htin of signage on Oracle shall be per Pima County Code;lighting of signage along Suffolk Drive is °#��tted.A°�' "`0 4..r'f " 9 9 i RECORD OF NEIGHBORHOOD MEETINGS SUFFOLK HILLS AND CATALINA VILLAGE#3 4. Signs-Signs should be subdued, but a ground mounted directory sign with an attractive design is acceptable. A meeting was held with the Suffolk Hills Neighborhood Board of Directors on November 18, 1998, and a follow-up meeting was conducted for the benefit of 5. Screening-Landscape buffers along Suffolk Drive and adjacent to residents of Suffolk Hills and Catalina Village#3 within 300 feet of a proposed residential areas should be planted with native species and should not rezoning on December 8, 1998, both at the Lutheran Church of the Ascension, contain high screen wall due to blockage of wildlife movement and 1220 West Magee Road. The first meeting was attended by 13 Association possible graffiti. A minimum 25 foot landscape buffer should be members, and the second was attended by one resident and her son. See the maintained adjacent to CR-1 residential. attached list. 6. Building Height-Structures will be limited to single story, 20 feet, The purposes of the meetings were: _ adjacent to residential zones and two stories, 24 feet, along the Oracle Road frontage. In January a 20 foot target pole will be erected so that 1. To introduce stakeholders to the property and the generalized concept residents can view the scale of building. for future development. 7. Entry-It might be desirable to create a center island and possibly to 2. To receive comments, expressions of concern and other feedback as relocate the existing Suffolk Hills entry monuments, input to plan revisions. 8. Architectural Review-CC&R's will stipulate that designs of buildings 3. To identify specific measures that could be implemented to satisfy on all parcels be submitted to the Suffolk Hills Architectural Committee concerns and adequately address all issues. for review and comment. Following presentation of the conceptual plan for the development of the property, 9. Screening Adjacent to TR-The south boundary of the south parcel is the following issues were identified and discussed: adjacent to existing vacant TR,where a bufferyard is not required. Instead, a six foot decorative masonry screen wall plus some trees in 1. Access and Traffic-It is difficult to exit Suffolk Drive turning left onto planters on the inside of the wall should be placed along the south Oracle due to high volumes and speed of southbound traffic. Many property line. residents instead take internal neighborhood streets to Magee or Ina so that they can gain access to signalized intersections. Future 10. North Parcel Buffer-A minimum 20 foot enhanced natural open employees and visitors to the offices might do the same thing, until space buffer should and will be maintained on the north side of the such time as a signal is installed on Oracle at Suffolk Drive,which is a wash, measured from the top of the wash bank. There should be no condition to commercial development across the street. In the interim, walls or fencing across this buffer. it might help matters to install speed humps on Suffolk Drive and Village ) Drive and/or to limit the amount of development with access to Suffolk Drive until such time as the signal installation is complete. 2. Design-Written guidelines to insure that architecture of all buildings is ,-..*--- "southwestern"and in keeping with Tucson architectural traditions ,,a'"i I k 3 ; I? , should be incorporated into covenants,conditions and restrictions. ��/, �:;.'t °' 4-.14/ Joesler-style architecture is preferred; however, stucco should be used i'._, +' .'.,,. sparingly and shiny metal roofs would not be acceptable. _b.) t, /4.-„.... -.;,;.o .. 3. Uses-Possible uses will be limited to business and professional '. ' offices only. No day care, motel, private club or hospital. Medical and c:':-'7. ;; `�� dental offices, clinics and laboratories are considered professional ?••4, L. - office uses. "----\ _�� � 1 !rrr I r` ti i� - ���ka'i y DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT )Sg-th% 201 N. STONE AVENUE, 1ST FLOOR TUCSON, AZ 85701 PHONE: 740-6800 FAX: 623-5411 . , 3 _` 0RECEIPT 0 PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA _30 **************************************************************************** ACTIVITY P98PL00337 FEES RECEIPT # 98P00375 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: TAX CODE: DATE: 10/13/1998 TIME: 14:25 COMP TYPE: NON-PERMIT PL RECEIPT APPLICATION TYPE: DESCRIPTION OF WORK: CO9-98-42 WALTER 81 JANE WONG APPLICANT: WALTER 8t JANE WONG OWNER: **************************************************************************** PAID BY: CHECK NOTATION: 1668 REZONING FEES 1,959.83 MISC SPECIAL ZON ACTIONS 530.00 TOTAL THIS PAYMENT $2,489.83 `' PIMA COUNTY ' op g. i,_w.',Ii,i,,tyDEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT : 11° 514" ACCEPTANCE OF PAYMENTiJiif dot' DES This is to acknowledge the acceptance of payment for the following: Reference • •ber: - / /_ i' ./ e ! 30)4 ç 0 A G cA_ From: i / ,_i _SA' J /A0j Payment Amount. $LY L) e3 cu Check # /6,6,r-- Cash 0 Other(specify) , Acceptance of this payment does not guarantee the request/permit will be granted approtit ''Z' w not necessarily cover the total amount of fees due. This acceptance of payment is not your receipt; when the fees have be ocessed, an actual receipt will be mailed to you. f Ad a - /---- .-k S• nature Of Employee Accepting Payment ate 41$2;)st?<>cstW3)1 r3#W*44?:4•Ain3iNii$?3 .83i 3i t40733?;iik0ii} 1031AI INA$13 3 3t031W3k31;40 /;ii t>t33R OMf3M#3W 84f3WOWs$043f41?-ct}#'W0ii0#3 330g0gio AC.,_ la . 13 . 91 owir44 ... REctv. 44 1 OCT 23 1998 3 CP 44/1 9 1110 ADVERTISEMENT: Co9-98-43 WONG - ORACLE ROAD REZONING Request of Walter and Jane Wong, represented by Don Laidlaw and Associates, for a rezoning of 1 . 31 acres from SR (Suburban Ranch) to TR (Transitional) , located on the east side of oracle Road, approximately 1/4 mile south of Magee Road. The request lies within and conforms to the Pima County Comprehensive Plan, Co7-89-2 . (District 1) mkt eVn ItIZOvi PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT JUDITH PATRICK PLANNING DIVISION PH (520)740-6800 DIRECTOR 201 N.STONE AVENUE FAX (520)623-5411 TUCSON,ARIZONA 85701-1207 20 October 1998 Mr. Don Laidlaw Don Laidlaw and Associates 1735 East Fort Lowell Road Suite 10 Tucson,AZ 85719 RE: Rezoning—Butterfield Crossing Dear Mr. Laidlaw, During a preliminary review of this request Zoning Administrator Frank Behlau said that in a conversation with you he indicated that the site analysis document and rezoning fees for these sites could be submitted as one,but that two separate applications were required. I have enclosed for revision the application submitted by you where the sites are combined. Please separate them, and resubmit two applications,with the appropriate information (ownership,letter of authorization, et al.). Upon resubmittal one application will be designated as case Co9-98-42; the other will be designated as Co9-98-43. Please also submit one additional copy of the site analysis,which will be incorporated into one of the files. Please contact me should you have any questions relative to what is required for this rezoning request. Very truly yours, Ohl d David Guyer Enclosure _,.,,, / t,"A\ i,. ., l', ; 14ZO14P PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 201 N. Stone Avenue, 1st Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207 JUDITH A. PATRICK Phone: (520)740-6520 Director FAX: (520)798-1836 October 23, 1998 MEMO TO: Frank Behlau, Principal Planner „,;: . -',;. ,, Planning Division FROM: Stephen M. Magelli, P.E. ) c-, i- '`�'`' Development Review Manager W, �r ---_- SUBJECT: Butterfield Crossing Site Analysis ..--- ---'— Co9-98-42/ We have reviewed the above-referenced Site Analysis as it relates to Pima County Wastewater Management Department's sanitary sewer system. The following checked comments are applicable to this project: XX A Capacity Response Letter (No. 98-39) has been prepared by Pima County Wastewater Management Department for this project and is included in this report as Exhibit I.I.1. XX This Site Analysis meets the requirements of the Pima County Wastewater Management Department and we have no objection to forwarding this project to the Planning and Zoning Commission for further action. Sanitary sewer service is not available in this rural location, therefore, no capacity response letter is required. If you have any questions or need additional information,please feel free to contact me at ext.6586. F ,. 1 ihridAji t; Stephen M. Magelli, P.E. P Development Review Manager SMM/kd Copy: Ref. File/Proj. File /k/b77Y PIMA COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION ,c., �-- APPLICATION FOR REZONING OWNER/i i /' ADDRESS PHONE (DAYTIME) , h / ef' 1�r1 �J` W s (FAX) ".F.z 7-23&9 , :3,7d'7Z, ,jt' i /ezz ef)-1 ,f , '7// APPLICANT (if other than owner) ADDESS ONE (DAYTIME) PeTi Lte/e0t-t-t/ 46--WZ. /73// / (FAX). ,,5 _ �.2-5 3 / 7140.6s"7/9 LEGAL DESCRIPTION/PROPERTY ADDRESS TAX CODE /l//..j) 'of ,g/dcL 8, 6%x e. 5W4. 1 C2)r i it,- 7z -�/ -Gv/A ,LJ7 ed`e07,- . T4d/ / f/s WHAT CONDITION OR CHARACTER OF THE PROPERTY, NEIGHBORHOOD OR AREA JUSTIFIES THIS REQUEST? i-dc �e ,/ 74' e'- ` „C.1' GLc ., f vim'% - /.?'1G ee.elr,.„' WHAT IS TH PROPOSED USE OF T E PROPERTY IF THE REZONING IS OBTAINED? �7/7ef _S ite-/ , 44--es ACREAGE OF PROPOSED ZONE (S) PRESENT ZONE PROPOSED ZONE // ;tic' /2.- /fl' The following are attached if applicable : 1. Five copies of the site analysis (if applicable) ; Or sketch plan (22 copies if map is larger than 8 1/2" by 11" sheet. ) 2 . Letter of authorization (if applicant is not the property owner) . 3 . County Assessor' s map showing subject and abutting properties. 4 . The entire rezoning fee. 5. List of beneficiaries of a trust or a list of corporate officers, if applicable. This application is true and correct to the best of m kno -0•e . I am the owner of the above described property or have been aut' . iz- d • owner to make this application. ///3//0 411dAltP:,„1 ,r__VW/r Date Signatu' r .f . -- .plicant FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY TITLE ,, 10x1� O� e,D Iii Cog- - 4 REZONING FROM TO MAP NO. FEE SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT v '421g1,8 3(seit_.C.7,--n---LOCATION OF PROPERTY I Ems- Stj , 0v-r. So-wg 01 ItiLystiz_ 00314 CROSS REFERENCE -'> Co 9 _ l r- 4 L 7 _T 0 _5- cilk. t ' REiVEO RECEIVED BY f S �.3 7ill'- DATE 10 _ CHECKED BY DATE O C T 2 3 1998 5, da L:\.••\forms\rzapp.cur 44t, 9 p ,e Co9- ` 43 PIMA COUNTY REZONING IMPACT STATEMENT Please answer the following questions as completely as possible; required hearings may be delayed if an adequate description of the proposed development is not provided. Staff will use the information to evaluate the proposed rezoning. Additional information may be provided on a separate sheet. NAME / /r:77/4Gti rant � (print) NAME OF FIRM (if any) //6,1 Z /,c' zA/ & 45e e6._ INTEREST IN PROPERTY , L=,7-5 1A/? SIGNATURE w ' /./ \''. DATE /G' /.579A ,f 1 A. PROPOSED LAND USE 1. Describe the proposed use of the property. -- am. -'...5a' e--/ /, _ ' /- /Ore' e. 5 Zer}1.4/ /74:6"__< 2. State why this use is needed. ! ' d/Zi kid /5 %' '"ii5c //I 7 , 3. If the proposed use is residential, how many total residential units will there be on the property to be rezoned? Will these be detached site-built homes, manufactured homes, or another type? Total units: A/ Type: 4. Will the sub'e_ 'roperty be split into additional lots? YES NO (circle one) .4- :i7 44 If so, how many total lots will there be on the property to be rezoned,4 at size in acres will each lot be? - • h * TT'l A/A- ---1 n r.T 1998 0..- Page 1 of 6 JA I 1‘ '8 5. If additional lots will be created by this rezoning, how will all-weather access be provided to these lots from a dedicated public road? (e.g. direct access, existing easement, new easement, etc.) 6. What is the maximum proposed building height? 26 feet and 2 stories 7. Provide an estimate of when proposed development will be started and completed. Starting date: Z2a/ Completion date: 2 293 8. If the proposed development is commercial or industrial : a. How many employees are anticipated? !0f b. How many parking spaces will be provided? c. What are the expected hours of operation? -3 d. Will a separate loading area be provided? / � e. Approximate size of building (sq. feet)? //9 7 f174} X 9. a. For commercial or industrial developments, or residential developments of three residences per acre or greater, state which bufferyard is required, according to Chapter 18.73 (Landscape Standards) of the Zoning Code. c4 b. Describe the buffer that will be provided (state buffer width, use of walls, or type of plant material) to meet t e Code requirem�, ,ent.//Refer to Chapter 18.73 of the Zoning Code. '/q Gl of .� Lz CI G-,� /-cz7 � j . �a P 'g� JR� Page 2 of 6 UK�4998 -~ d�� 2 3 .._� f998 10. If the proposed development is an industrial project, state the industrial wastes that will be produced and how they will be disposed of. (Discuss the means of disposal with the Wastewater Management Department at 740-6500 or the Department of Environmental Quality at 740-3340.) / B. SITE CONDITIONS - EXISTING AND PROPOSED 1. Are there existing uses on the site? YES (l11.0 a. If yes, describe the use, stating the number and type of dwelling unit, business, etc. ///i4 b. If no, is the property undisturbed, or are there areas that have been graded? 2. If the proposed rezoning is approved, will the existing use be removed, altered, or remain as is? 4l`4 3. Are there any existing utility easements on the subject property ? ZES?' NO If yes, state their type and width, and show their location on the sketch plan or preliminary development plan. /�47i i KSed 4. Describe the overall topography of the subject property, and note whether any slopes of greater that 15% are present on the property. Note any rock outcropping or unusual land forms or features. Ato mow 44 5. Note any areas of heavy vegetation on the sketch plan or preliminary foziropme plan. x/e2 4e7/ RECEIVED 1 Page 3 of 6 `�-Al UAORYt 1998 199$ 444 9 C> 6. Are there any natural drainageways (washes) on the subject property? (Si .) NO If yes, state whether these natural drainage patterns will be altered by the proposed development, and what type of alteration is proposed. (2/--e2' el& /--d)14-79 cs� - yzc /J (NOTE: For inforZation regarding flood control requirements, call 740-6350.) 7. Approximately how much of the subject property is proposed to be graded, including areas where most vegetation will be cleared? C, acres, or 7/ percent of the land area. How much of this area is currently graded? 8. Describe any revegetation proposal in areas where development will require removal of natural vegetation. -72,- /t5p/4t,i14 /-0 ei4Ewfc.-ee7 /2-ey14-7 ‘/e-f_5 61 /i/ea//9A&., d've doei/�/66/ 9. For rezonings larger than 3.3 acres (144,000 square feet) or for more than one residential unit per 3.3 acres: a. Is the subject property elevation less than 4,000 feet? NO ESQ b. Are there any saguaro on the subject property that are eight feet or taller or that contain a woodpecker cavity? If yes, how many? NO YES Number: c. Are there any mesquite trees on the subject property with trunks six inches or greater in diameter as measured four feet above ground? If yes, how many? NO ES Number: eelf d. Are there any palo verde trees on the subject property with trunks six inches or greater in diameter as measured four feet above ground? If yes, hooriar NO ES j Number: 2 � o RECEIVED OCT 231998 w Page 4 of 6 NUARY 1998 4\ f ,; e. Are there any ironwood trees on the subject property with trunks six inches or greater in diameter as measured four feet above ground? If yes, how many? NO YES Number: f. Have any Cactus Ferruginous Pygmy Owls been found on the subject property or within 1,500 feet of the proposed development project as a result of an Owl Habitat Survey? V1 No survey has been done. 2) No owls were found as a result of a survey performed on (date). 3) (number of) owls were found as a result of a survey performed on (date). 10. Will a septic system or public sewer be used for the proposed development? SEPTIC (SEi If septic is to be used, state whether one currently exists on the property and, if so, whether additions to that system will be needed for this development. (NOTE: For information on septic system requirements, call the Department of Environmental Quality at 740-3340.) 11. How will water be supplied to the property? /1ii- Is the available supply adequate for the proposed development? 12 irtit NO NOT SURE RECEIVE(' IVE(' OCT 23 1998 w Page 5 of 6 UARY 1998 421t 9 C. SURROUNDING LAND USE Describe in detail adjacent and nearby land uses within approximately 500 feet of the subject property in all directions. NORTH: � ���- - iTly SOUTH: 4lCi EAST: WEST: cie �� ;)_ ' xj2/� �l ,/ 71/.z 0113 Itti RECEIVED 44 OCT 23 1998 3 LA. . .\FORMS\2NDFLOOR\IMPACT.SMT 4144 Page 6 of 6 JANUARY 1998 .;per,\ \ ME RANDUM • 77 4• r �+;1 Devil;o ,ment Services Department oI DATE: October 27, 1998 TO: David Guyer, Senior Planner FROM: Ted Payne, ezoning Section Planning Division Development Review Division SUBJECT: Rezoning Site Analysis Comments for Co9-98-42/43 (1st Draft) Butterfield Crossing - Oracle Road at Suffolk Drive Rezoning Staff has reviewed the 1st draft of the above referenced site analysis and finds it to be incomplete. The following are staffs' comments and concerns. General Note: Some of the maps (exhibits) did not reproduce well and are hard to read. Part I - Site Inventory I-B Topography All maps indicate that the contour intervals are two feet. However, they are one foot. Table 1 - The total linear feet of contour was omitted. Indicate on the topo exhibits that there are no slopes equal to or greater than 15%. I-C Hydrology These properties are located in the Riverside Terrace Basin Management Plan area which is being classified as a critical basin. (See attached Comprehensive Plan Flood Control Report for this property). There are substantial Q-100 and drainage area differences between the site analysis data and the Riverside Terrace Basin Management Plan data. Explain the differences and/or correct the site analysis data. There needs to be some description and information provided for drainage immediately adjacent to the property, specifically regarding existing drainage located in the Oracle Road (ADOT) right-of-way. Address the limited capacities of the Oracle Road box culverts and any back water impacts, existing detention/retention areas, etc. Site Analysis, Co9-98-42/43 Page 2 of 3 October 27, 1998 I-D Vegetation The Northern property contains a substantial amount of mapped riparian habitat. This riparian habitat is classified as Xeroriparian C and as such should be preserved. Refer to Article X, Watercourse and Riparian Habitat Protection and Mitigation Requirements, of the Flood Control Ordinance regarding any encroachment or alteration of this area. Provide an exhibit which shows the riparian habitat area as mapped by the Flood Control District. (See attached • Comprehensive Plan Flood Control Report for this property) I-H Traffic Exhibit I-H is hard to read and it does not show the area roads very well. Oracle Road, Magee Road and Ina Road are all designated scenic routes. Oracle Road has an ordinance required building setback of 150 feet from the centerline of the roadway. Capacity for Oracle Road is approximately 52,000. Capacity for Ina Road is approximately 35,000. Give the following two counts for Magee Road: West of Oracle Road 17,186; East of Oracle Road 2,573. Suffolk Drive has a capacity of approximately 2,500. Northern Avenue is not a major route and the proposed rezonings have no specific impact to this road. Therefore, the information presented regarding Northern Avenue can be removed. Presently the County has no roadway improvement plans for this area. Check with ADOT for any State planned improvements. The commercial rezoned property to the West is required to provide a signal at Suffolk Drive and Oracle Road when the property is developed. I-N Composite Map Indicate the mapped Xeroriparian C area. In the legend indicate that there are no slopes 15% or greater. Part II - Land Use Proposal II-B Preliminary Development Plan The plan should show the location of any proposed bank protection, retention/detention areas and any proposed drainage channels. II-D Topography The Flood Control District should be contacted regarding the proposed grading and development in the Xeroriparian C area. They can help with the habitat mapping and explain the mitigation standards and implementation guidelines. Also, the Flood Control District will be asked to recommend rezoning conditions based on the proposed preliminary development plan. Site Analysis,al sis, Co9-98-42/43 Page 3 of 3 October 27, 1998 II-E Hydrology See comments from Section I-C Hydrology regarding the existing and post floodplain data. Revise this section of the site analysis accordingly. Use the Critical Basin designation. Exhibits II E - Label the main natural channels, the 100-year Floodplains and provide the 100-year discharges. There should be a provision made for a drainage crossing and traffic connection between the building areas of 5 and 6. When Suffolk Drive and Oracle Road are signalized, buildings 3,4 and 5 will be able to make better use of the signal. II-F Vegetation See comments from Section I-D Vegetation. II-K Traffic Because of existing adjacent access points to Oracle Road, Variances for the proposed access points maybe needed to meet County standards, i.e., "Entrance and exit drives crossing the street property line are limited to two per three hundred feet of frontage along any single street, with their nearest pavement edges spaced at least eighty feet apart." The traffic accessing the properties from Suffolk Drive may require a left-turn lane. The traffic impacts to Suffolk Drive and its intersection with Oracle Road will need to be evaluated to determine if other roadway improvements and right- of-way are necessary. Staff will recommend that the property owner participate in the future improvements to the Suffolk Drive/Oracle Road intersection. The trip rates presented are low for general office uses. Also, if there are any medical office uses, the trip rates will be substantially higher. Provide Staff with acceptable supporting data and information regarding the projected project traffic trips. Staff estimates that the total trips for the office use could vary from approximately 1,600 ADT to 2,280 ADT. Note: This review does not certify that the preliminary development plan as presented meets all of the requirements and/or standards of the Zoning Code or the Public Works Department. Determination of completeness also does not represent staff's endorsement or approval of the rezoning requested or the project design. TJP/tp c: File Co9-98-42/43 to,,,,p,„, MEMORANDUM ,, ,. ,1‘15 Pima County Administration I y r m ► Archaeologyand Historic Preservation .., 201 North Stone Avenue, 7th Floor lilt zo Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207 Phone: (520)740-6598 Fax: (520)740-6320 lmayro@dot.co.pima.az.us dcushman@dot.co.pima.az.us rr- ,`, r. 77 rr c-r,- r._�. DATE: October 29, 1998 I .,i, r __. .. , ,,. ._ ;il, TO: David Guyer, Planner, Development Services Lit; }<<fir: ; QCR L:._-) FROM: David Cushman, Program Coordinator, Cultural Resources SUBJECT: Comments onk Butterfield Crossing Rezoning(Co9-98- 421; Co9-98-43) October 8, 1998 I have reviewed the first draft of this document and have the following comments. An archaeological survey of the subject property has been conducted by a state permitted archaeologist as indicated on Page 12, Section I L. The letter report prepared by Professional Archaeological Services and Technologies and submitted as Exhibit 1-L.1 indicates that no cultural resources were found during survey. Therefore, no further work is warranted and the cultural resources provisions for this rezoning have been met. I recommend however,that the developer be cautioned about the potential for archaeological discovery and the protections afforded human remains on private land under state law pursuant to ARS 41-865. I recommend the following be added to Page 30, Section II-P. "If during construction, materials that may be human remains and associated burial items are discovered, ground disturbing activities in the vicinity of the discovery will cease,the discovery site will be secured, and the Arizona State Museum will be immediately notified." Nam ' 4j `I: �OV 1998 cr; W, 4 - services N. *, To Whom It May Concern: This is to authorize Don Laidlaw &Associates to act as agent and representative of the Wong Trust with respect to all planning and zoning matters pertaining to Pima County Assessor's parcels 225-51-011 A, 225-51-018A, 225-51-0190 and 225-51-0200. W es.._ 0.3 Date: 3 1Ak Walter Wong, Trust 2 J �, Date: 2 _L? - 7ff Jane7y ong, Trustee %ill ' ; 4 • RECEIVE° OCT ? 3 198 6. 4414 OP 9 y f,a f i �?\ ,.- .. 5C.. / Don Laidlaw & Associates Land and Community Planning October 1, 1998 . � .°---, / • Mr. Donald Diguardi '; - 550 East Cambridge Drive Tucson, Arizona 85704 f; Subject: Oracle Road Rezoning Dear Mr. Diguardi: I am writing to you as the president of the Suffolk Hills Property Owners' Association to advise you of a pending application for rezoning of approximately eight acres along Oracle Road, north and south of Suffolk Drive, to TR — Transitional, to permit development of business and professional offices. The sites are shaded on the attached map. These properties were purchased many years ago by the Wong family of Tucson and have been held in trust for family members. Due to growing expressions of interest by prospective purchasers of office property along Oracle Road, a decision has been made to rezone the properties at this time, subject to conditions and restrictions. A preliminary draft of self-imposed restrictions is enclosed. In the planning and zoning of this property, it will be our paramount objective to insure high quality development and compatibility with the Suffolk Hills neighborhood. We believe office uses to be in harmony with neighborhood objectives, as night time and weekend use is limited and there are seldom nuisances such as loud music or barking dogs. As you can see from the design and development standards, controls on architecture, landscaping and lighting are intended to insure an attractive and unobtrusive appearance. I would appreciate it if you would contact me by `phone at 322-5339 so that we can discuss the next step in presenting zoning and development proposals toAallart) neighborhood, particularly those neighbors who are within 300 feet of the prO boundaries. However, I do recognize that Suffolk Drive is the principal en 127 r' the neighborhood and that the quality of development at that entry point As' REcavEn everybody's business, so that everybody's concerns should be given due cr) OCT 2 3 1998 consideration. I am interested in receiving input regarding site planning, 1735 East Fort Lowell, Suite 10, Tucson, Arizona 85719 520/322-5339 FAX 520/322-9175 9 Page Two Mr. Donald Diguardi October 1, 1998 landscaping, buffering and other design features so that we can all be on the same page as far as zoning conditions and restrictions are concerned. I would also like to identify a convenient neighborhood meeting place that would accommodate a sizeable group. I enclose a list of Suffolk Hills residents to whom I will be sending future meeting notices, for you information. I sincerely look forward to hearing from you so that we can set the public review and comment process in I=o. Very truly •urs 4 dor - C Dona d H. : d . , AICP ra Enclosures cc: Mr. and Mrs. Walter Wong Mr. Peter Wong pp "44 4 E 5, (ICI 2 3 1g38 9 ` ' <`•,, l�`% ,\ �`;' - I, 1 BUTTERFIELD CROSSING DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ` --•: The following design and development standards are applied to the rezoning of ::!.. . ' parcels along Oracle Road for office use under the TR zoning district. In all cases they are equal to or more stringent than the zoning code. RESTRICTION THIS ZONING PROJECT CODE MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACKS • FROM ORACLE ROAD 60' 50' • FROM SUFFOLK DRIVE 40' 20' • FROM RESIDENTIAL LOTS 45' 25' • FROM OTHER USES 10' 7' MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT • ALONG ORACLE ROAD 28' 34' • ADJACENT TO CR-1 20' 34' • ADJACENT TO OTHER 28' 34' MINIMUM BUFFERYARDS • ALONG ORACLE ROAD 10' 10' • ALONG SUFFOLK DRIVE 10' 10' • ADJACENT TO CR-1 25' 10' MATERIALS, COLORS, TEXTURES External building surfaces shall be masonry or stucco. Exposed wood may be used for structural elements and trim. Visible roof surfaces shall be tile or metal. Parapets, where used, shall be continuous around the building except where interrupted by other roof planes. Wall colors shall be southwestern, including a full range of earth tones, subdued greens and pale pastel sunset colors. Reflectivity shall not exceed 80 percent. Trim and accent colors with more vivid hues and gloss may be used sparingly. Stucco surfaces may be smooth or textured; wood surfaces should be rough for structural elements; glass walls are prohibited. 001114* LANDSCAPING 4. ,� RECEIVED All bufferyards will contain native plant materials in place, augmented a- OCT 23 1998 appropriate with trees transplanted on-site plus container grown shrubs tP 4fil 9 ' accents that are similar in appearance and drought tolerance to the on-site vegetation. All desert broom will be removed. Chain link fencing is prohibited. LIGHTING Nighttime floodlighting of buildings and grounds is prohibited. Security lighting shall be directed away from roads and residential properties, and shall be arranged to illuminate parking and landscape surfaces, not the buildings themselves. Lighting of signage on Oracle shall be per Pima County Code; lighting of signage along Suffolk Drive is prohibited. •--). Nifit ak 1 ECENEQ - OCT 23 1998 la cP 44 9 .1°1f SUFFOLK HILLS MAILING LIST WITHIN 300 FEET OF REZONING BOUNDARY LOT NAME /ADDRESS TELEPHONE 1 Stephen F. & Maria S. Hale 139 W. Suffolk Drive Tucson, Arizona 85704 2 Betty Tatalajski 119 W. Suffolk Drive Tucson, Arizona 85704 21 Raymond L. Sharp, Trustee 102 W. Suffolk Drive Tucson, Arizona 85704 22 Alice S. Paul 116 W. Suffolk Drive Tucson, Arizona 85704 23 James J. & Eileen Fay Sabatinos 7404 Adelphi Road Hyattsville, MD 20783 24 Robert E. & Carol A. Knych 142 W. Suffolk Drive Tucson, Arizona 85704 • 25 Catherine Martin Fehrenkamp 7715 N. Arundel Drive Tucson, Arizona 85704 26 James M. & Lisa K. Ryles 7727 N. Arundel Drive Tucson, Arizona 85704 27 Susan Schock Grinold 812 W. 8th Street Silver City, New Mexico 88061 12 28 Rodolfo & Dolores G. Valencia 7755 N. Arundel Court RECENE Tucson, Arizona 85704 OCT 2 3 1998 411 9 %° 29 William W. MacDonald Evelyn M. Gibbons 7769 N. Arundel Court Tucson, Arizona 85704 30 Maria T. Jurecky 7783 N. Arundel Court Tucson, Arizona 85704 31 Marlin J. & Karen J. Schweigert 7770 N. Arundel Court Tucson, Arizona 85704 32 Irene S. Tompkins 7760 N. Arundel Court Tucson, Arizona 85704 33 Earl F. Throckmorton 7754 N. Arundel Drive Tucson, Arizona 85704 34 Doyle E. Young 7815 N. Village Avenue Tucson, Arizona 85704 35 Judy R. Reis P. O. Box 298 Bisbee, Arizona 85603 36 Dennis J. & Mary E. Pasborg 7841 N. Village Avenue Tucson, Arizona 85704 37 Albert S. & Evelyn V. Rogalsky, Trustees 7853 N. Village Avenue Tucson, Arizona 85704 Property Mr. Donald Diguardi Owners' 550 E. Cambridge Drive Association Tucson, Arizona 85704 idtla1111% Kegs I - - O C T 23 '9.98 ea U, %al 9 (tow,' $rzo PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT JUDITH PATRICK PLANNING DIVISION PH (520)740-6800 DIRECTOR 201 N.STONE AVENUE FAX (520)623 541 TUCSON,ARIZONA 85701-1207 12 November 1998 Mr. Don Laidlaw Don Laidlaw and Associates 1735 East Fort Lowell Road, Suite 10 Tucson, AZ 85719 Re: Site Analysis for Co9-98-42 43 WONG - ORACLE ROAD REZONING (FIRST DRAFT) Dear Mr. Laidlaw, Staff has found the site analysis for the above case to be INCOMPLETE. Please address the following items before resubmittal of the document. There is a $66.00 fee for each site analysis resubrnittal. SITE INVENTORY Existing Land Uses I-A..3.b,c No page (North) Please describe in the text all existing land uses within 1/4 mile of the rezoning site area. The exhibit does not identify what the uses are, only that they are commercial or residential. (South) Page Two Shouldn't the text read "Abutting properties south of Suffolk Hills and east (not west) of Oracle Road"? Topography I-B.1 Exhibits The exhibits don't say anything. Some sort of legend should be provided should restate topographic (or lack of) features. Mr. Don Laidlaw Site Analysis Review Co9-98-42/43 (First Draft) Page Two Vegetation I-D.2 Exhibits No detail can be distinguished from the aerial photographs What methodology was used in determining vegetative densities? Please see Ted Payne's notes relative to riparian habitat on the site. Wildlife I-E.a,b,c Please address these topics,as requested on page nine of the site analysis guidelines. Please indicate in the text of the document the special status species that may be present on the site. Viewsheds I-G.2 Page 9 Define the methodology used in determining vegetative densities. Recreation and Trails I-K Page 12 The number should be "2", rather than "3". LAND USE PROPOSAL Project Overview II-A.2 Page 13 Catalina Foothills Special Area Policy 2-19 limits building heights to 24 feet; that policy will be a condition of this rezoning request. Preliminary Development Plan II-B.1,2 There is no preliminary development plan acetate for the proposal_ The acetate enclosed in the document is the composite map. The acetate overlays should also include information from the written support data as appears in the text, as well. Mr. Don Laidlaw Site Analysis Review Co9-98-42/43 (First Draft) Page Three Existing Land Uses II-C Page 15 This topic should address how the proposed uses will affect existing land uses on the site. Buffer Plan II-I Page 25 Please label and indicate the buffer plan on exhibits in this section, rather than making reference to other exhibits in the document. Please also identify the buffervard by letter, as you have done in the rezoning application. Water II-NI Page 29 Please provide a statement of water service provision and availability from Tucson Water. Cultural Resources: Archaeological and Historic Sites II-P No page The correspondence from PAST does not state there are no cultural resources on the site, and there is a qualifying statement to that effect in the second paragraph of the correspondence—which should be reflected in the text of the document. GENERAL COMMENTS Please set up the site analysis document following the outline format of the site analysis guidelines document. The rezoning sites meet the criteria established by the Board of Supervisors relative to the requirement for a pygmy owl survey. That survey requirement will be a condition of this rezoning request. The photocopied aerial photographs are generally of poor quality and should be redone. Please outline the rezoning site boundaries on all photographic aerial exhibits. Has there been any response to this proposal from the affected homeowners? The required bibliography is not in the document. Mr. Don Laidlaw Site Analysis Review Co9-98-42/43 (First Draft) Page Four Comments are enclosed from Transportation Development Review, Wastewater Management Development Review, and the Cultural Resources Office. Please contact me should you have any questions about this site analysis review. Ve truly yours Dri o avid Guyer Senior Planner Enclosures: (3) ___,_____ to,,,,,, MEMORANDUM , ,,:;,„,, ,-,' DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT-PLANNING $iz011� DIVISION TO: Jim Forbus,Senior Property Appraiser,Pima County Assessor's Office Ben Goff, DOT Jim Mullady,Pima County Parks and Recreation (Inter-Mail) Ted Payne,Development Review,DOT-FCD Janet Russell,Real Property Division,DOT-FCD Maggie Shaw, Civil Engineering Assistant,Department of Environmental Quality Leo Smith,Manager,Flood Control District Lucia S.Thurston,Development Review,Wastewater Management Amphitheater Unified School District, 701 W,Wetmore,Tucson,AZ 85705 Attention: John Rose,Associate Superintendent Tucson City Water, 310 W. Alameda(INTERMAIL) ATTN: Lorenzo Hernandez,New Development Unit Supervisor Tucson Electric Power,4350 E. Irvington Road,Tucson,AZ 85702 ATTN: Lee Aitken Tucson Unified School District, Planning Services, 2025 E.Winsett,Tucson,AZ 85719 ATTN: GUY FERRO, PLANNING DEPARTMENT FROM: David Guyer,Senior Planner Development Services Department-Planning Division SUBJECT: REZONING TRANSMITTAL FOR AGENCY AND DEPARTMENT REVIEW CASE: Co9-98-43 WONG - ORACLE ROAD REZONING REZONING FROM SR TO TR DATE: 17 November 1998 The attached map shows the requested rezoning area.The request is being reviewed for a staff report to the Pima County Planning and Zoning Commission and Board of Supervisors. We are sending this information to you so the applicant,the Planning and Zoning Commission,and the Supervisors may be advised of any requirements or recommendations your office will have on this case. Your report will be helpful in preparing a recommendation and establishing rezoning conditions for this rezoning. PLEASE RESPOND IN WRITING BY 1 DECEMBER 1998 WITH YOUR COMMENTS ON THIS REZONING TO THE FOLLOWING: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION 201 NORTH STONE, SECOND FLOOR TUCSON,AZ 85701 FAX NUMBER: 623-5411 1111!" 0 • • • • • AMPHITHEATER (� + _ Public Schools 1± c� - GOVERNING BOARD ✓ _ _ Michael Bernal Virginia Houston Richard A.Scott,Ph.D. November 20, 1998 Gary C.Woodard Nancy Young Wright ADMINISTRATION Mr. David Guyer, Senior Planner Robert J.Smith.Ed.D. Development Services Dept., Planning Div. Superintendent 201 North Stone, Second Floor Cathy Esposito,Ph.D. Tucson, AZ 85701 Associate Superintendent Katie M.Frey, Ph.D. Associate Superintendent Richard M.Hoolev,Ed.D. Re: 1,Q 98-43 Wong-Oracle Road Rezoning Associate Superintendent Co9-98-42 Wong-Oracle Road Rezoning Todd A.Jaeger,J.D. Associate to Superintendent Dear Mr. Guyer: John E.Rose fociate Superintendent You recently submitted a rezoning request on the above-referenced project for Amphitheater High review and comment. As this project is commercial in nature, it does not have Canyon del Oro High an impact on our schools. ,Amphitheater Middle hool Coronado K-8 School Thank you for including us in your review process; it is very beneficial to us for Cross Middle School planning purposes. If I can provide any additional information, please call me l u Cinia Middle School at 696-5130. Wilson K-8 School Copper Creek Elementary. Donaldson Elementary Harelson Elemeitar Sincerely Holaway Elementary Keeling Elementary Mesa Verde Elementary Nash Elementary. Prince Elementarl John E. Rose Rio Vista Elementary Associate Superintendent Walker Elementary Rillito Center JER/epc • 701 West Wetmore Rd. • 'son,Arizona 85705 (D20)696-5158 FAX: (520)696-5047 TDD: (520)696-5055 ,:x.:_i_ �', oti ;,),,, ,kt4. MEMORANDUM i�,� ' PUBLIC WORKS - DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DATE: November 30, 1998 TO: David Guyer Senior Planner FROM: Maggie Shaw, Civil Engineering Assistant 0 k tiw (PDEQ) SUBJECT: Co9-98-43 Wong-Oracle Road On behalf of PDEQ, the proposed rezoning has been reviewed for compliance with Department of Environmental Quality requirements. Please note the following comments: 1. The Department has no objection provided the property is served by public or private sewer. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please call me at 740-6502. xc: David M. Esposito, Director, PDEQ Lucy Thurston, Development Review ( \ Cam•' 0 f ���-a ``,.• . t ✓r ,V PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 201 N. Stone Avenue, 1st Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207 JUDITH A. PATRICK Phone: (520)740-6520 Director FAX: (520)798-1836 December 1, 1998 TO: David Guyer, Senior Planner Planning Division 's FROM: Lucia S. Thurston, P.E. r` Development Review Engineer(Wastewater) t SUBJECT: Wong-Oracle Road(North Parcel) Rezoning ._. Co9-98-43 There is currently adequate conveyance capacity to accommodate this rezoning in the downstream sewerage system. This is not a commitment of conveyance capacity allocation. Conveyance capacity allocation is accomplished by execution of a Sewer Service Agreement,which normally occurs during the development plan or plat review process. If conditions change between now and the time a development plan or tentative plat is submitted,the property owner may be required to augment the existing public sewerage system in order to provide adequate conveyance capacity for this rezoning. Connection may be made to the 8-inch sewer lines,M-555 on the north or S-125 on the east. Public sanitary sewers to be constructed with this rezoning shall be located within paved roadways or alleyways, or within easements that provide vehicular access,whenever possible,to all manholes. We have no objection to this rezoning. * * * Standard and Special Requirements * * * Requirements of the Wastewater Management Department are as follows: The property owner must connect to the public sewer system at the location and in the manner specified by Wastewater Management at the time of review of the tentative plat,development plan or request for building permit. If you wish to discuss the above comments,please contact me at 740-6586. Lucia S. Thurston, P.E. Development Review Engineer(Wastewater) LST/lst Copy: Project/Ref Files W A TT T.A. C S O N E R INVESTING IN OUR COMMUNITY 59 =1V6.1 Tucson Water Department December 17, 1998 - =-} \�1 Development Services Attn.: David Guyer r ! ig* 201 N.Stone Ave. 2nd Floor Tucson,AZ 85701 SUBJECT: Co9-98-43—Wong—Oracle Road Rezoning from SR to TR WATER SUPPLY Tucson Water has been designated by the State of Arizona,Department of Water Resources, as having an assured water supply. This does not mean that water service is currently available to the proposed development. This development lies within the exterior boundary of Tucson Water's planned 50-year service area. Therefore,water supply is assured. WATER SERVICE The approval of water meter applications is subject to the availability of water service at the time an application is made. The developer shall be required to submit a water master plan identifying water use, fire flow requirements and all major on-site and off-site water facilities and the proposed connection points to the existing water system. Any Specific Area Plan Fees,Protected Main Fees,and/or other needed facilities' costs are to be paid by the developer. The comments herein made are valid for a period of one year only. If you have any questions,please call New Development at 791-4718. Sincerely, Ma-ZZA.A.2 Lawrence Mulhern System Evaluation Unit Supervisor cc: File(2) a:\ping\cntyko99843.doc �-s,, _ �,a��.�'�ri�?3irS�i�Y.+-�r.:rTa+ x�.rsYrs:' ac�r:u1�. ;Gi�r_r •,�" "s}�.� sa�' i ="'�"''`4''�-�L_ s� � � t'..., . �"�' ,�, ,�`�.�. S"'. _;, Laidlaw Consulting, L.L.C. i j1-2-11t5 Land and Community Planning . '` \:101 t ft f April 26, 1999 r, (f J I Mr. David Guyer Senior Planner j. •.`��- ,:�� � .s_., -::�: 201 North Stone, 2nd Floor `' t Tucson, Arizona 85701 Subject: Co9-98-42/43 — Oracle Road at Suffolk Rezoning Dear David: Transmitted herewith are five copies of a revised Site Analysis for the above captioned rezoning. The purpose of this letter is to respond to bringing you up to date on progress and to respond to your comment letter of 12 November 1998. The reason it has taken so long to revise and resubmit the Site Analysis is that the hydrologist omitted a substantial portion of the drainage basin affecting north parcel, so that the 100 year stormflow was substantially understated. It took literally months to get things straightened out with Flood Control and to make the necessary revisions, which included replanning the north parcel and revising all related text and exhibits. In the order stated, here are my responses to your comments: Existing Land Uses 9 j - ij Existing land uses have been described in detail on pages 1 through 4 of the text. "West" has been changed to "east" of Oracle Road. Thank you for catching this. Topography Z% zt�r�4, Topography exhibits have been revised to be more descriptive. Vegetation ; , / 7 I thinkyou will agree that/the aerial phgtog a phs are much improved. The previous attempt to use digitally scanned photographs was, as you pointed out, not satisfactory. - Xerori ari Methodolo re vegetative density is stated in a text. The mapp p _0 9Y "C" habitat is not identified by either the hydrologist or the plant specialist — or by /735 East Fort Lowe//, Suite /0, Tucson, Arizona 85 7/9 520/322-5 339 FAX 520/322-9/ 75 Page Two Mr. David Guyer April 26, 1999 me — and that oversight has now been corrected in several sections of the text and two additional exhibits. Wildlife The wildlife section has been revised as requested. viewsheds You asked that I define the methodology used in determining vegetative densities with respect to viewsheds. I assume that you mean methodology or criteria pertaining to visibility. I have revised this section to describe both methodology and criteria. / 1 Recreation and Trails I have changed the number to "2." Thank you for noticing this. Project Overview /,,/, Building height has been revised to 24 feet to conform with Catalina Foothills Special Area Policy 2-19. Plan 7 �j Preliminary Development ,) The PDP acetates are in a pocket in the Site Analysis. The two PDP's have been revised to show total parking for each site as well as building setbacks from Oracle Road in addition to maximum building floor area and height. Existing Land Uses ) / 2 I have rewritten the section on existing land uses to make it clear that there are no existing land uses on the site. Buffer Plan /) 2 I Separate buffer plan exhibits with dimension and bufferyard designator have been prepared. Page Three Mr. David Guyer April 26, 1999 Water A letter from Tucson Water is ovided. Cultural resources: Archaeological and Historic Sites 3/ Revisions to Cultural Resources section have been made as requested. GENERAL COMMENTS With respect to your general comments, I believe that the outline format is being followed, I understand that an owl survey will be a rezoning condition,t aerialhe l have photos are now of improved quality, rezoning site boundaries areoutlined, utled met twice with affected homeowners and the bibliography is included. I enclose for your information a letter to Ted Payne covering areas of concern noted by him. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this resubmi'norder resubmittal, please let me to avoid know right away so w,e can meet and resolve matters quickly further delays. Very truly yours, Donald H. Laidlaw, AICP DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 201 N. STONE AVENUE, 1ST FLOOR TUCSON, AZ 85701 PHONE: 740-6800 FAX: 623-5411 Co crt RECEIPT ` ' ✓ PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA ******************************************************************************************** ACTIVITY P99PL00208 FEES RECEIPT # 99P00213 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: TAX CODE: DATE: 04/28/1999 TIME: 16:37 COMP TYPE: NON-PERMIT PL RECEIPT APPLICATION TYPE: DESCRIPTION OF WORK: APPLICANT: LAIDLAW CONSULTING, L.L.C. OWNER: *******************************************************************************************> PAID BY CHECK NOTATION: 1934 MISC SPECIAL ZON ACTIONS 66.00 TOTAL THIS PAYMENT $66.00 7 Plit ("I Y� i,„,„iii iiiii;„... .., ; i$i'� � MEMORANDUM Development Services Department DATE: May 4, 1999 ,,,--77-Thii,e_gp.6, TO: David Guyer, Senior Planner FROM: Ted Payne, ezoning Section Planning Division Development Review Division SUBJECT: Rezoning Site Analysis Comments for Co9-98-42/43 (2nd Draft) Butterfield Crossing - Oracle Road at Suffolk Drive Rezoning Staff has reviewed the 2nd draft of the above referenced site analysis and finds it to be complete. The following are staffs' comments and concerns. Part I - Site Inventory I-C Hydrology These properties are located in the Riverside Terrace Basin Management Plan area which is being classified as a critical basin. I-H Traffic Oracle Road, Magee Road and Ina Road are all designated scenic routes. Capacity for Magee West is approximately 16,000. Part II - Land Use Proposal II-K Traffic Correct the total trips indicated for buildings 1-5 from 415 to 831. Note: This review does not certify that the preliminary development plan as presented meets all of the requirements and/or standards of the Zoning Code or the Public Works Department. Determination of completeness also does not represent staff's endorsement or approval of the rezoning requested or the project design. c: File Co9-98-42/43 5E C E E 1 i `i MAY 4 1999 0 +yr trr'' 1. , Y P ,4 LM I ttr° r•�u, E,.• r +77'.'I nrrq•?°. "• ^dt Y°,',1"' tF n 5 x•r /t ,(" �.�,,!, c e. q`$Jpl1A,'" J�: 1: �'eV{, , 91, y,_/� I.;y,1' 4 r t' • ."• 14m.r� .t 1p T 1;.;It d rP,y'r:wti Jl i.it,. I r''F,:�.:- Aii..\`6r .,ar••,..:.'•:'1:°111' '', .1'." T lyr11,(y: 1�,�iy" ynY !•.... 5 5;W r`^ r ' + Q(�Sr�'1/ S 'A . 'YAI ,.�: n ati f q ,,(/ti -"`+Ij ,, ,y'•, L,;i;, r 1 KI r.f, f,t Kiii° tA, +,p� ;WWI illti • ''! 1 J•}.t'. -"'.i•'l ,`', ,, ,:r' N'" 1 �� :4�i ki y , .r,«sm h 41 a S h i li 1. d 1• t�tP; �l 4' a R.A. nL:• •f Q aYlt per ` "�� r^.o+.YI Y(n r ) °S I "'`�w x� ikt }fro.f •(r,pe,•410,10• ,, ; .p;,n t(k5 ,.4,4•1,.04 `1 li II,AEI(i e(: /!( 'y, ,, i c,'.1 , t f!"�! r9t1,p•, , 4� !1 I +! d�.^ ^4, ,�, rA. iA 4, ,, ay,"i1-, ,li'r 7, c �,, f,141, \}A''Bth w' d ..`' A r Ar ' , �r i ;''~,p�r�+�:,¢ � (g(; �j,/It►�� SIB r ��q/yyj,,p,,�SQ ��j{ y'/p��Q,tl t k� , � �'�•`t1 �^ ' x '}' 1 ` ' ova'f 4996d!�r;ile 1 1(' � - �° 4` �Mt e.' �(y 0- ` 1 v��* e�iM '.1, wY(lrAl Yava�lk. `,.,'; `,' •PK.• ,`0:„,1 ( 14.c. + . , N•`h! * �1 '. 'f(x ( •� j 'f• �(1iAP'r'' ° 'y n¢t /9 .'rj t� Y.0 /.Y/..° i!' ,. „�rai5, i{ I 6 � tl•.' IE�1�4.��i�B { Y'+1 ,'arh 'y++ . j.�' D 't•: <sU•I�' '�;, 'g�/' �,i ' f' 'Ttl1 �5 � 't" C} b>"� y ';�;� '16,�'irr '! •r`t c�'d t J;Afirf, r T'J'�r:'r'sa`,l T;hj�,l;�dr ��,. q_.._., , .-ram p.Ir;�F��*.'4�t r i, i�;;r?l(� k 1'° � .1 I „':i,r '' Of'cU '' k E "pS iSr l" ,r„1�a ,;.,,,,1 1t5 f�',,,f r 1 7 + t 4 ;'hiii i 91i100) : > ,4 '' l0 , rrr,: 'Q'tl9k . ..ad 14 1..' : G� ':�,'( i, r i 1i4, 1 '• r L7ifilMS'n`e. e..,.. d 671 9 i A t' 1 1 1 rDdJibl �� r p`:"�".'-� �tdR.q,� -�[7�i1,'�.f�lil.NmlrlY&R!',S r.DWti�fBrlN+ilY2 ,'•1./ @i165tfNAWACfiIY?WNSf1��r,�fr� .'� i�'`}'!h 1„�f., t k..4rNr-wz.1';y.'.v.:tFr.*. 4j, �pue.7,, ( i ,. 1, i�r,,. ..t ,--�yr1'(�c Z 6.1n r ,' S 1 r)f')- ./... ''74" -PG::" ll"'' , '; ,.I` ', ,r.;ril 1 r., IAIfBiA7•tE11EA�bf1 Fr }��ir '1�'r,.}", ,41 ,t P.� (', ?I ? 1�"1t l' �4 lY!A;+�l�,'1�' ,�,P 4 5 ,›r JtF i*.., 4+t>&R{ .s,t:'•�` . 1;� "w'P ���ti/:ft`�. ,,,t.5. tNr}t h7' ,,'ri s• / e. t j�' j, y'�' 1�•�'xl. .';((�. � 1.,.rltl�1��'I�i;..r��:?!::� :.'[' t.. d'b{yir,��•t f r k o!1,' , t f', R� r\. 5+ F•`! '�' �, "! �j" � � t+fQ � s b„ �,,�(t1 N��: .d 9 •r. )'4� �.: t 'h � I'y(�1` iti'fr:i'el � ., 1I :� �� rY?d r a , - ,: rr' A. >z. i+ r6 R' lill ,cr.j1 `�, '( ,, , i,'; � ';:1.. .d di I �y� 1c,y. �/ .;;i .( { �:+(f''•', e� 49 1 r? ;��� �Fr( a ,i, a.'�.; a1� •,J"'l��• �:,� l , ri ��) ', r t•,s f�( �1 � '�'•, !•x 1 j '�i,r +.'y+"w�r�'.you";)r,,�:�`� ;+� �•'��••,,rr 'y. a• �• � Z� §',';�.{a �� � e � 5t ! 11 a`h p }917r � � .; t. !S• J Iu :!,d �f � j `r y+ �,(,��.,w, ry1.,�l ,t Pfd+f� ,�I,'',ry 1 vi.C'",Q ,� � (1 ika,.tj. �ry i,l�'•+,�•.' NblI?'' 15"'I >t✓�.'I'.. 'i':'�. rrY'[¢,'+S yi�"!• � ' ':f{- rR�' p � / %f�r; c7y ,i',.'r L 1L 4.iT. a'rw ! t .b( A• ,'i 4 ode e; �'.��` r. 1a, i�. !, ,4 .,11 it\".,f,f ',qv, G/rt :tFE� 5 rut ' F EJ /. fr f •t ,t+n ), 5tr.ltryr11 .5++1� y 'r." �{( �t�• k:.v 11t1f r.. ,f�, /p�/:. •1. i'�,` c�,t..A�(...R..,, +� (,, r Ty/fig :I:LwQt }� _r. 3. t .rca., ;�„ �1 :.:r,at 1'•vt rG , r. A r 11,4010 � . /!,�w r,�dsr:li t 1 r, i r ,q,e'f�! .`•;/:m{ i!),, i, ;I +� I<':�f ',.��U '�,! '^.li' Y 1 •, fir}f�y,a r ..,Snt.o rtl f?!`' (VFW'.{`J��' •C'''..i5', +F.ti � Mr' ,; . �:+ - ' fi ,�`bl ° +?n ',�1 a ,�5.� { ,�' � ,J;/r d•3 �� 1 r .L.:I(�,� :J,v r�. � � r n >: �Lrl4rf.'(`47011,14��'� z.f p+1,711t a .I:' II S,l `, . 14, • ,,4 �' s: L•J i i �'` i 7 4 'fi!0i b 'J. L y • �ih! ri., i 'r, •f` �,n ..,; i. ,, A �(ff+, ll ,p• :�•', i, f �f'{'ja f y.fr I ,�I Ia, t y 1 ,t � ,} 1J, i`y,, %,r / ':.�.,..i �(,'�r'' it� r 9', �i ,'1i'' t t .j%y�(1 .,.;y r �'.� rT -t �4,' ��. ..1j f.,,�7:ti .fTi.� ..a5�j,'� •.il' 4 ,;`•! � �/!' 4 �I'ri i'(� ,A' (. i � y, ,r r�, r 1. �.7 � gp ( .I!i'iF .N? ?� �}'A 7�/i t' r i 1 f ,s' i �.i,+l �j° r 5 Jr(v 7,'S 4'.tt• A':�; � �.•+' ,i.J, d)! �/ p)' � /�L ,fi1 .•b1+17 r14. ;;1+47 i � ;S �� r1r�1 ,.iy�1t�5 J �:� Li�r +1 , ,t 7 �' �.}.1,..•I. f^. r 4yn .,'1. t�. !Y ,$'W ',et'' ,.i� i r f y yl fi; Alio:I1r' 'l.;t:� 1 41 f�l i .? , (" '}4A4.0' I ,,i I . 'f�Jyf4,4 .•�,5, :�r 1, 4 4',� :,r�P"�(r��,' vQ ��••1 ^ , g'l;;1 .'t(j. ..�r•� .�.'( �i r ,,Ai�. ' �t;';r,!•M.,�` :P' w�- r'�' �i,'�f �I, �L'�r .' .'•FN_ .r ,.�, E > I.011. 44:544 L ' "?g.d ,7 )f'114 '1' ,/•}w 1 3!• ,l,r r a ,,r li , a'r,eh; .P. ,'j'° Y;i. A' i. .,...'4h ,1 ' "1' ,1!,3S ''. • 'fit; c ,. t-t i,,,/. .c..4!' 4,,: 6 F:•4 ^�1. i.i :ji''; ' i �''' 1�' i' rt •/!(h'��1r,il�(GY' !r„a,r.liI,Yr,. ,u '1, 1 f�i ,.) '4.i. ( e.`;.T:t '''.rn„�, �, „ 1�e,aLwr7AMrr _ .r , •r' 1."fV,ir�.,A ',N'"1'1k Fr,�I ,. •J I!:' �rf ,c l ♦'r . )y 0 ,yr�. ,i , .,..,•m •irl fr,:�t. ""'�( /,��.'(- 't t,q �!1: h. „A ,.eLW1•�r raa.• �I,,{{�p,!.h'',��,{ '�:,4.1(7 �i 1,{�,�, '(. 4 !r/fJ'��'' r�( ,���( d�3( �FI�I(d r,, � '(f'/N`/. ''•i' a, •t nr. „( 'i..•, •',:.), r .4 r",Sx ,t+ •.r.�.,,>;tW ,tl7,,,•1;'£•,•,x! • •'"`9 ,4 ' ,1 eft .{„'''.4gli',�.,'1 ,',7,a:i;f'4.nY ?l.. 4,A. '4::.+. , , ,"i: `Y 'i ,ff'. I� g , !.. � :4 n4 t.'k' 1.• !: t .Yaa, :f ,(r I,J;.y I^f (•, «S„. -Y,,7c,:. � t).� ,,..,;Ir.i ix �:' iF'� 1.1`( Fi'G :ui r T IJ,w.tr..ti>'ala llri 4..;,,(�1 r;i. -A r;1aC�.•, sl^+\ ly�' �' 1 �•',:�4!, 'fN R,{I� t Jr ' t7d1'•".�' 1 7 � •a {`In 't' � (. �j. .,,(f c, .„�'''r'-f' t 'ifT4.�19"t,4� r ''�;�.�, ,IJ•r.,/.Ar .n. J`1,sp t' � ' M)<r .t 5 81��, y ,i , I� i, t s i`'f• vpir1• f' r L.r"i +y>' i�,lyY Y j t �6 S(J(k,;`'f 7� .. 1M �• tk J' i { iF,1(+, i,,,l fit, , 'T,. rl'1 V"' a•',,, # „i •1"1T,,:,i,,, a.,,-b,: !t` 1,. (• .+la .,f�4-gl, �''i i•1i1c I- rl�„ }I ('47,♦ J.,,10: ^tt�'.'tr'•1 ,,�i{ ,;f ''�j i �. ,Lt Yr,,}f�',/ r�` S .riT 'l �!•.?; itYS•, rryra �,1.11� , ci r• r•f, : .!r .1 G•'.f,!1 1' ;,•� r5 '•Z ,, - �.� l,s �r� .�i+IJ'Fr:if�:Uf'!11�I( 1.', � r•I p.r ) !fry p (',{�,,,}t,. ,�{�[� s}'{ 3},. •( I,�•,,, •;•:t 4 • i'. (':9 et .lip, .da- ,t- ,• t.r•�I•r t 1 ,1 $6,'Y ,ir'rl.A 5'('.:,..ry:S'7 CI i' 1 i`i.,: i`C'�: i ;t • r. ,,,:r i ,,,,, s r f ��(( it r L > �%' *�•r•;�d;t{r � h S v. ,A' ,1. ,t. �'$ y } �. °�. .I,,.'�`4,yi +)• f�.15y.�. ..r.� r �. �.. r r,�,it :."�'. � j�r�,;I y, 1 p ,.:�(' � M14';�Y ei Jr'n4 Stll 11 r ��y r I : ar, �.r. �i' ''7�L �}'.i ','��.t� y'r j•r;8''-9•�Y.�° ,Q t'#t rl�, �� )r'iP.}�:S�.i. Zr�" � ;� "K r .7. ?p ;.,?d, ,.i,� T °A'ir� lj t .i,',M','1 I.. ,,,. ;(. ""[. �.:{+N,� �F6..� �., ��, s.`,}i,(� ,a�f"WOW ni �, t_ } .) �. �L 7 a ; �(. , f° Y rni� a ..f `,RPM j1 � ! 1'. k' 'r,��.�j 1;r sty,4 ,"' ,tf�• 1 ill* a4 tjf. ; n4 ;, g i a 4 y r / q r ��M' ( Y Y� � y�+ 4 �i ,k„ �• '� „j+. �{� 't��;�,t' 1, .S. Y .I "'•` r •1 P yu1'' ���, d !•,,i,9 ,y� dt ii w�+lY�� 'r.�,;1 r �t u,r 1 NI;;: -�r` ,�'+lI�,S(.�[y�rr!1 c9 71+�;,�i�' �/'t m rY ��3t" ,� �,f .:r•, /)1./^ /i''�t>.'�'� ;tt':/'^. S 'IJ4t;Yf•r n ,4. n .f�, �fI' ,'� f •r' S I C ,•t+t, �( 'h �t. < ^. r Jk.� y,I '!};,, I fil ! i!° f A,f `rq�,iF9�' r I 1.?fl 1 `,or(^11. ', rl l,at .r + f'.0 }•T.'f .. 'f+�G ,, ,+!(•r ,+;tr) i+v'!', +l:i ¢ nR( r.%''I � ,a Ha '{ ,J �:�r'.r A7,''y,,:l'� . ?/ ii�i I 17�'�ff�r�''i�'1a �fi'�.i .C ,:rs;;•,{,.�,'•Crr1'',S:r.>: .i'�Ki..,i l� i�fi , �.-A+C �;(`��'' T C,'4' `,:..y •.nfiU9Ir. V,A'. r yy'Nf,.9 ,,q,.'t ,'I' a1',a r' ': , ..1 ;A- •i, 5, rr •;fxr: ,�e4i ekkI $, ej ,.t,•S}i`'r,r, '1 4 r4. !" t; {f r• .S f((I'I.':' t'� 4.!,� 11.' •!�.' ..,�Yr �kt, (, �,.1 ,�1�'.-.? �(�� �r.' t },•tq. �y� r� ,a�� .ix� 7,J'.,a� ,; �th��, � f '�.'. ,:''1� �,.�' ���,X' '7.''T,J • ,k0, f pl+r .,onx•.rur /lt r� ) r(�1 '•• ,�Tr• 1`.'1� � ! ,, •1.1i� '6 .!: f`� ut�'1P jnthH,ti'�•�,�'•�4 yl :Y�'fir ),, s •f 3 Ff�T '�`+p'�' �4� r�+Yl' I ry1',1I S !. � ,y}N 19Ct�i,Sr�,L:tt 2 h l ; .��, , NOW, 5f Y; 1. 1 rf g (� 1 r.,..�yd Y rota, RNLI , �}} it." �fl(,>,� r. (1 1;L •f i),• ;'� 1 1"'I y'}r I.,1'fi1. ,,,n Ir' r.. 1 •s�, ��tii.rlt;' �'I f 4' c .,1� :; �o �� �� i .:�� 5'.1'!� al.�uJrfi'tt" � �„} 6 I f I,,--rwri �:Ira., s P1 ,E ' i .E T !y K r 1 !' ti:(�� ) , ! f' 1,,I M.6�iIQ r. d YH i,.1 ,4'. '' { ' 9)'',4 1 1 I * ti 1 �; ,E: !'`,'.'`,1,r. S (0.r `� all .: •�YSj o,i x r p E iQr 1. /,r;p r,. i,' l' 1' /./ 'F 4 t�lyR, ,r{, '; � • ( ,i!� 1 + �.( •ram Vrr'�1 '�.� ,•f ,9 n' �.j. i,�;(, !r .,Pr..,,��' �,1 „,j �1�' y�I] r�+l,! 1tr,N'4� fl.3,`E , ,'') i, .d, '' ' i ,J. ,1' r N ' f '., , yin• �( yr,r ° r rr, it , t r 1 ,.,y tirr( d� '{49( 'n,., ,0 4��r y A7ni(I I, r 1, L 0 1.-.F r • i. ,t,1,, i4 y( i - 1 r y re 1 'ky.. .r +�!�{ ��qry -% tf , :IJi' SII, py: , 7• } .,� /•',F'�' f.r. ..d� ,Y � �T�kl�r.�� "' 1 •.r.. + 5 tP� :�: r d �• r',: }i�w! GA w fJ� r' �k" c 't�lla t+� /,w�'�`T'Y• 1 ,Y1A _ r KSlt? >fliFIi143b� �!l91 C£T°91Pft1> t� . 'c r ',ti'. r a ', M� sura ('I li , , •IL $ 1I it �/+t 1.1 �Aai ,@dp1��)1,'.„ ,,,,,. tt °r '/r�'.'t ,„.r,°r� 'h,U 'rwlih {�a1 17Rrif}Y�A71 1P [,gyp!,/}�gq�pg����5y(J��� 7�f�Trk J yks'7w�,�t�i�°�i r,,rl/ �r"wc!Y r�yr l' ,,,.4,`4 , f��'�lu�; \+ 1 f°�ql",�k r tl` t r , i •. C/' ,i , Bar1:�1tflU7fr47tCJ,ti11F,, .E4 �'�/Awa'. '.,�•U,! , B, �,y pli'2' ' it ° r' {it4' '• , 'rl ` ,+ '� , �1 l °z ,..' m. fr +, � N I A' Y, . # / ,'1(•,, pF,j "!^ ",e Ft,;1• ;yN r 5W4:iaar•m,,r,iir.+0 U� ifa 1 "' ''i• ,. . a r !�rf t�f,(0 TIII. .ii„,,'„,.,:,i,,,,,,,.,id '.�✓� '+6 `tttl[ rtt •:.�� :!�.'>r;)r�.'.2�;'.�y"!i fkr r uw,wwA,xr ,1I �� ,r , � ,'�. ,�,(� tb7 r�. .), t►4 '1, i `i;,S.. T .errta°rwwm„w. ;'.. :?"f,�,t• �„�I,rAenr^°ei {' .^Mvr .,r�f 4 r''''. '"l'l 6'• �'f J�+tt1( . ,• ,. `. f fif ,�t1,4 .J r,F \rS% 1'J F 'U7DANR+T/A/ i k 4�.� iU(6. X �' ' ,, ; ^'-44;ry J , i r$i r f,iTir�� t � r ,+ � t ►1� '" 4� ,} I'.4 �`,�.. ' rat;` 1r�.r� ',��to.t��4��' �M j A � 1}�M`�f{^� �t.�, ' y �1t+� "S, � �, ��� '� ,�' �0s�',i t'•: 4 .t�f4Y�,�'� r1 ' e a?c' 1 >'` �IS Ja�i��r 1�111►1♦ :� 4 ,. , r �� . t p"'�{ lits ,,' ,� N��`�j71 ♦r� I �qJ� ,,, r i ;� d•{,; �>$1%"y t. '� ,.}��`q )1' N' •q , �4�.��!j ^,�t��/gal�,�(�ti'b ��ASS+ .;1�.���`7�r�RL14/ 'od� �,ruTs��"�,IiT�� °'J,tY �� ,n,d4'^' *',�{��1if+`�� •,■ ¢ prf �� + ° ,P��d� d ° y� 't,M,�r ��y,� ��r�v�.y!�Hyp� �. I (, 'ir.'iv 7.�i�YYS'�kr,h { 'G �r d (�J�C 1 ' g (I AlJ (' + i t hF i'' fele kfi �„ r1 t+4 n � p r r r ,�� CI l 'r .( �8,,, (, t� °qQ t (!( `Irlt,?ff"�ri, t 0;;At y ? 1. i.r`!. (EtjM' Z! �r ��g d r",� , 4r. S s„,rt•,a,„ 1r.. rr 1+� �(J ri 15 jai r, i hl.L� �f r �• C f<(�'�f'!� . r�■� IwZJ� ,.`(tkr� 1 ' I n '• ��,C'i.41'��' t ,�''1 VJS I ` i n,YAnd��,pa1c ti:I I ,ryy,►. ^'!CBIN,I•�J'i�MaC�A.�hu jyJtA y'`�'pyI y1 yj�9rl'�,�h�.f' , � ,I(( ',i�'1' .�y 'irR 14 t�i(Av}`�cl�f,u�s' x i t 4 I' i ii �tl , /'gT ,! '. J (y�' „.',',�y,�,.,"' ,� - 4 f �II f' + d ,li,I0,./,,,,* 1�� '�r. , V hy5 ,TJ,�,1','vPl h ��p�, ,•il4'1 �{fyi r':4J.( �y •r1, I iAil !�v�`'IEI�� li,�i '•IIfPr','l'vlid4i'A'S'•9'! k} •` ' ?•NJ�I��.+�f�ln�9t b..d '�,5+�cltlbq_■NE 4 , ! ' '1,1j7' ' ,, +'" 1i''• ,et, ,, T,�/5,! .�'i "+ i i 1 ' W; I Pare '4•t1r { ..N { f; '.a it it IR � �. 'Y` 1 fii� i?', a,.'dC !r'ii l' r. 1!�i s,'? i ,1�'`q'. 'I i c r_ C7 i p,I ( 0' �„,j .f 1, (.6 dy 1:/4•d ,,•, 1' r ,, J ,. ,r•. ,I, er 4., 7I1J �■ � ■ �■ 1t, ;J��\,R ,.,� r ,e, 7N.u�.�°j� �A 4.�'�r[A� .IM .'' !r �'',l� �:� ),, r / �� ,J� rJ,�1),;•; � I(r� !,{ r 17 ,.slAttd tilqii �)5 1.p f1',s Jk�.k tl yl, ,�,{�•T .w. ) rr� f° '1'k' tom'_ � �� � � �.tr .' '� . [l��._�1it f � � �t�'>!`:h(' �+��'c+l ,I+Fr,- \'� Rtti�f, d)1G ,� w^'�t 1�'�•i c^r1,f�ttl,�`i���^�Tih�,,p vrpf t� + 4� •nt 1 , t h`' yy I,Y rt 1■. ■LI■ Z 1 '10rih ,�i�s` i a1 rii13 +.tF. 4Ji•fr','4, ;t��� / MF } 1r {Ifia.��nil 0— �',o+,�,''1', ili J .' �1e' ,. ` ui% 4 '�T 1 6 ,mitt;-. A f ' ,, :.. t t�� , i sq 1�,f,4 �,� 41�. ;h' ., "_� __/ W, a Ir-�,i' ,-'( /o (l ' r 'r TA (ar rp n� , to r 5� )'i ��y]jC�y)� uq -r.'ts ^/ (,'< 1 .r�j'�� •j!'1�) 11 1'�ri(p�nj;/pi��tu7li,pr� q iw ���}r. il.a . Q !e'�8) ,di�r �O,Y1:(is r paxt}+') ,(t.Y'r'-1,i,f5X1 ,ii.S1,CI ,iti +'ri .wj {I!/':,0 "',,• ,� hitoVii,,,w1�1r 4 �i 0 Htql < ^;t, ��nit'�9�r�r' �1' Y/ rrrrrr!!! 41��" .i ,at, 1 R y/ t Lr � �'�'l � 7, 11111���, Mill' , z rp,e;�g1 bhy� t NI k i'} 1.,,Si0 ,°t' f ( ,`l{{A'OI ■ W �, i N�- I� t�i� 1�y- �vV YGr ,,�CN �1�,� �� N.., '. '':i! ''i\r r",1}��IP•il -' . , 1 '.T�'A, i t/' n$�f eZ, , ''f f, r ` y ,K�,d E rY !',c"AA• r ( + ',°i, f.'q,♦ r } r, 1a, i 1♦it. ,. . • q ��g �(J 1(, �dy()'r�.' i�/JS ,P q, P} i �. �' Y!'tf�( / Ji E'r1ai� r,r'Y �� . �'t i� r Or48d!>LS' r A 5. ;yi, `c�+l'rrw�'OiOFfN '$4 tl,s` r�4l wreki,, �t ,4 ° 1' f/.' '�,d: ptl, m ° r 1r t f n4, J r r� pUriMMjMlg9.16'WA,w !II r c '4!1:�'7rs 1♦iIiIV �!+ �'ar k!$f r i4,< r r>:`5(✓( 'r,'!�e l',�%\*�tr a 4 r �I� f;� f !' ,`r'r r !�)��r�;t n�;).'� Q 1♦— la 11• . ..1- N f. d d ti( :6 iir,i4 {�, I A rt'1 it .ate I 44" `t Ea fi s"r bSF1>f ;r-j )r, p ,t,4, ,,,te 141,J � �. ��, � ;.. Aa A �R�OJ•��,1�r.. {f t s r 14 T� v, Aµ,,f r,rr .. � r,•' (• ''1 �4 �Dk.', '+J:..h9 �{ ?",1•,45 /4•1i. „vh,,I,t1,4,, ;,.;N p'}•!c gi °,i( r' !�';y i!L d Sf ., � � .r, T �ii•� tJ `'".,/ �, �1•�fhF �Ta +(r,r 7 f' �• • . --'- D• AI , f / '.N 'i ,,14 'i}tt�,1,,'4•,�(.. ,1•,.ri'',,e. •' ;�'f:, 1 ,d ,..... .it ,,t�`1t9 4,h j�fU,Y?ofi �i �7� �L + ,!x 1' r ? .;rx�; •^••i{f/YA�Ib:. A�, Y' r .n. N � L -- 4 ". "I'.n,a,••e, ',i ry�'•N Aj/,,. U 4, ,psj w. '''''' f,+f x•7iAlE"esvto,y,d .,.1C d' 1.1, -1� }� r,F,, N'"Sf' ^ #'iTTTF l((Xa V4i, F Ei' L.U11111101110$41 i ��(,(p�e�� f A.it• 4 A t s(( ��A•, �• /.,,` �K��K}aa,�gq,yy'����tt( r tS�'�r" r O. t11111111,�A1114 '���k'fiT�� .� r�! AVM. A. _6 IF. /''t , ,�1rbk ENT v, L r„�i., , I ., r'��`',., "t rb h / J`f 1.1) r 6 n i,j, Y �'k,t� •.1 !' , .r lt691A tlt11i1'A-. ,;,. C' Y 4Cee (,��{�p r ,C.LIx91�111.W6WUA'Sf d , tr i c•• �� • �� / ' '1'1' �� i633 �L�� 1 ,;.Oi1d1"•.,,•1��5. tt���y� q �� ;�•��',� j � e,� ', �p�i� ar.�y ,, !{� �'S 11tJt'�' ■ �Mail ■,'4� i ' 01}IlCd72r'ta1l�JarAfh!,:tr 4 o 4 P..dd91 .rl) r','F'1 X5w•°T lyy vt! �"EN i�1 t vW W'f'k�1�i�,,,!,,k ii•r■#49II. Ii �e. -V�� '� G :{'i�i',✓r a,.,yi;7Sf t tia)i,n,)r {,J,r� tr�Llt��{..�? '1 ,it i,J 1'�f'1��ramp,'-■t%� .y y llrY„A,7,W ( , ,�r'' j,t>t ,k7 r ,r ,,t'1,,tr t�a�jr �f` a '�c�'r'.'� A i/.,�k�M tiifrofitkoc � o41r � ,� t ta�'.i t1'� It ho�' i`4., ��� �•� ,, ) r vas Q ,' ft-Y °.i w {' . yy°,/ ! I ,:t. r, r 1A,.1 ,,y+c' t�l�(' h , atxrJ�(y! iggp • ,�} C 41 7 Ur r P.4.7.7a(G,,fy r ,,'i Pao ��(W11 W r , 41AA.q(�i�}�Y)(y�r'1` !ti''di ,�+��pjy ?s �� 5( Y}'t(7'�4 1 iirmIII bTi iiiilidillineatilaillBONO .—sir.. '6� r.r.: M, :t����:!`dD'':../y/1:�i3�„���,' -a,�`'' .'fayYr�1."'i �',�' ���i��yp�," w�•,� 'rRnT 11V�,i�Y, i�yj��l.l �( IIINI hill J f , .} r I 4--Al- ia"1' /• , 1•I 1 I •'„ i CAIAV,'6oAT,SRO /, ♦ iiii..4,•,,i '�'• ,,ria,4tNQ`���p �� ✓ ,/ ,-/�, ,-,-.. � �}L,i 14 . $* II1!j ,IUIIIU ,,, •p� .., ., ` t /:— F1171 '4./%Asylum WM, ,, inegisiss IN ' ' 07,104' *el':Y6.1 1 , 1"4111 VysIiNmaa %A M4iiiilli 111 mw ii•, /•' 7 MV O ai I : ui o o�'. ;111ir19!J� ���r �'�'►�I'�i' ••Tyi "i/ ,' ,, ,/ IIII ,.•41 ail°. II rA411104till •r�4t►A IIIwa !!!1Hui ' uI , , ,�, , , ,• , , , , , . , , , ,, .„• al , ,„ ,mum.jit,„,...., ,..., , , , , IllirAill iii.4viqir cm • • so• 4 .-- , ii.., , ,,, , , , , „ ,.., ,,,/,, ,, ii* 11 Maar 11111rANC, Nio, • ,/ / , , , . /Fn. i Itiockigie ' /16WAki. ,'Ilk /diiikak , , , ,/ : ar_iiialkiNW./.44440660.'10.4110 •Awil / , , ,K , : 71.1',/IT'///,',1,82611 MOW:: ' ' ik el ://rri ''', I joy. w \:11,81,1*',"Ozatini351‘111111F/44,41:///,•8, ,,:',, • • - ' -_ , . , aim- c, , • Iwo 0 �r141111 op ,�0010 � a ; =y�� 0 Q '0��/ low -,/,, Q HARLSN5Tif fit,. .• ,.- : 40�►kt ► ,/�T I dimlet it iiiiila Pr�.Li[1I �j �,3 5 , 67 t'�.aRi' , C..G•A A n n I fig• �' 'NI ,,' ' 'I' ' ' , ,' , / , , .■■..R-.. I. 'fit 1-'- , ILE �� , �i sIII ,' , ,, , , ,, 'f• !Nil' /0 , , , , / , , , , .... ____,_ ,, 40 '41 4 •• i,/ ,/0c*, ,/,, , ,/ / / , ,', , , 4. , i. illii,..ssitiALtz,,mo,- Itararblifitwellgligal. °ail all MIMI ,,,i''2 , �l� iiga3, - ig r...: 4,,, ,,,,,7„„ , „,,, „.,/ ,, „, iiiiptsltio. 4 . I%‘, 0, , ,,,„://::„ ,i„, f, „ ,,,, ,...D ,s , •V _,--j o c, II mai,,,,,,./ ,■.■■ii11l! /I I I J W I S. •� ,All ��,•. :� , atErirlfircZE A , ow in EIN No IrR4 ,—44, ' 1-4101 - 1 ' et OA 1111-41 ell ,. lin Blisae p Fig W N a 1-- ;um 0 `t o' •.� , i •. , � -A V S A PL -- I Z� • .■, . �'1IIIM IOW ,d, �N11 o L l,.���. _ Ir1bIi1 ......---i i i / i 1 1 1 1 �-- fl I- 111111110 11■��12.�.�Le '� o -� ' ; VIA V 1 MAkIMILIAN N 11.�1113 --� . a �l w11111M0lialL1 :1. iiii■ INE �E imi /agavel/specproj/bozo2/bz_plot.aml ;or, „7=4 - tl 4,1"ot.10 PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT JUDITH PATRICK PLANNING DIVISION PH' (520)740-6800 DIRECTOR 201 N.STONE AVENUE FAX (520)623-5411 TUCSON,ARIZONA 85701-1207 13 May 1999 Mr. Don Laidlaw Laidlaw Consulting,L.L.C. 1735 East Fort Lowell Road, Suite 10 Tucson,AZ 85719 - 2 3 WONG - ORACLE ROAD REZONING (SECOND Re: Site Analysis for Cog 98 4 / DRAFT) Dear Mr. Laidlaw, Staff has found the site analysis for the above case to be INCOMPLETE. Please address the following items before resubmittal of the document. There is a $66.00 fee for each site analysis resubmittal. SITE INVENTORY Vegetation I-D.2 Exhibits The exhibits are greatly improved. Thank you for making the requested changes. LAND USE PROPOSAL Topography II-D Page 18 The entire area of the north site,and a triangular area on the south site;are subject to the requirements of the Buffer Overlay Zone (BOZ). For the north site, that means that 50 percent of it must be left as natural open space, which would seem contrary to the preliminary proposal for it. You should discuss with Vicente Sanchez how the BOZ applies to the triangular portion of the south parcel. The BOZ must be addressed before the site analysis can be found complete, and at that time it can be scheduled for a hearing before the Design Review Committee (DRC). Comments are enclosed from Transportation Development Review. Please contact me should you have any questions about this site analysis review. Mr. Don Laidlaw Site Analysis Review Co9-98-42/43 (Second Draft) Page Two Very truly yours, avid Guye Senior Plann Enclosures: (3) 0 4 MEMORANDUM b \— DEVELOPMENT MENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT- PLANNING DIVISION TO: Coronado National Forest,John McGee,Forest Superintendent,300 West Congress Street,Tucson,AZ 85701 FROM: David Guyer, Senior Planner Development Services Department-Planning Division SUBJECT: REZONING TRANSMITTAL FOR AGENCY AND DEPARTMENT REVIEW CASE: Co9-98-43 WONG - ORACLE ROAD REZONING Rezoning from: SR Rezoning to: TR DATE: 19 May 1999 The attached map shows the requested rezoning area. The request is being reviewed for a staff report to the Pima County Planning and Zoning Commission and Board of Supervisors. We are sending this information to you so the applicant,the Planning and Zoning Commission,and the Supervisors may be advised of any requirements or recommendations your office will have on this case. Your report will be helpful in preparing a recommendation and establishing any conditions to this rezoning request. PLEASE RESPOND IN WRITING BY 2 JUNE 1999 WITH YOUR COMMENTS ON THIS AMENDMENT REQUEST TO THE FOLLOWING: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION 201 NORTH STONE, SECOND FLOOR TUCSON,AZ 85701 FAX NUMBER: 623-5411 :dg Attachments a' -- . . - . _ -. p r ,� X:mcr: �, • ovx,4 0 SIB V4PWli gia _ r. R,C. A:v- mini anam -.----3,, TR � �-•- _I - -.1/billa .. - -, - : :CB- AA 1- as &i ci.' ,- . SR , •......... iiiiiho _ • ..,, ,,,,s .... '^ :'" �•r� •C�i-+C-...0 VAC '° .. C C Er c --c-7-, --- RD ii ! IT f ` ,q 311 It 4 MAGEE RD. -�►•--- ..mAGFf •)-i . II . . i LI ffilm„,- -i ‘ . . SR APART 3AFC CB-I s ilicAttei. SHOPPING1--- 1 "". " CENTER '3 OgPPING T x IF- -4 M• --CR- - - o . •�• 0 CENTER •a '� Nib. _ . _ - � �R-I / -fir. _ VAC lit.: �R-I "vac :AWan'� ' J --C �� ... VAC , nQ� .. w ' 1 • j.. R VAC -CB•1- - •FC .741 - ._ / t R VAC •.FC ..R . .SU FOL HILint. ••o . . • • e a sfvAc r SUBDIVISION . R TR • �' „•FC " • , R TR VAC F : . .01 � ' -1/4 MILE '''_fir ' -.... : CT/ R R SR vac . '°°` _ „ • _ • • VAC ;... :,,j .,. - IIR 1.E3 R _R - - �,� VAC R R - .. r R R R. r e R-I � R — r■ it VA R .� i4+ L'�R C' 11:111 �1 . ti R - R CRiiii -I SUBDIVISION t.. ,l .� �,.) � ' •rt.�, VAC R . R '� • R R .•' R �' •• / 0: ..• r AFC ~ w. R R do f - :/ O OFC -r • R OFC 'rA "• Cb '", w 4i1 Okla � N• •• / N Not to Scale A A EXHIBIT I-A.3 SURROUNDING AREA LAND USE VI - 4E' _ ' 43 BUTTERFIELD CROSSING r 'it! t // fill I !f 1 i (/ " :II i,_ / 5.A . ' di ll I i / \ :p,....aul..DIN, • / 1/ti ',i` "`;•,, a ',`� ."' "Pas: - _ ~- // /. - • ' - ALLEY \\_. ' > , . l --mulT11111011 10111/.1:17" .,. \,) A i 1• I -S OR : F ET '.'. ri, •KO SQ.--Fti,-t 1.1 ' _ ... -SOY 26:Et" • ! ._. 0 ' '' ,,fri „,. ..mii, ri L-, . _,., „.._______, ia- ree \ i V k 1 / I Z ji'.• -- -'.--. ,;.- r W ' �i. ? -' • - t/ I `—' ���\��vEgcx �ns + ��` _ 1 f o I \ _ ,u __ 7 Z !�� �" , ;% 1r` i tr ( • .-. k B9'u•i - ) 0'ENHANCED_ ,:vo- l'A -- /.•'• If 7,...., "141‘,... ., , - _____. (----. . -i. -— .14W1.11-4"11bz-7-- . .._.---,--,„- - / t '21, 1 ,,,' r / / !, I, (is: , s.C..: ,..._......,, •,,, i\ a r_._, „.....y--,7- i ? / /` cz ( / / 11 i r --- 7�; • "- ‘ ; --- 'i 11.9' $,,,, i 14— / / /_L__ ‘,,. ! :' : i 1. ,• ' / ' / / i- 1 ..- J 1., :'i[S! /' I/-\--_�� r :...:3")..... 8)7" di.... A/C17friA 1 /144 ( EXHIBIT II-B. 1 (N) PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN, NORTH N Scale: 1" = 100' BUTTERFIELD CROSSING A 2' Contour Intervals DLFIA it;l1 -11 ,( A2)26- ( .1 DRAFT SITE ANALYSIS ���, c �v BUTTERFIELD � v CROSSING BUSINESS / PROFESSIONAL OFFICES ORACLE ROAD AT SUFFOLK DRIVE TUCSON , ARIZONA REVISED APRIL 22, 1999 REVISED MAY 20, 1999 OWNER: AGENT: WALTER & JANE WONG LAIDLAW CONSULTING, LLC 5437 EAST THIRD STREET 1735 E. FT. LOWELL, SUITE 10 TUCSON, ARIZONA 85711 TUCSON, ARIZONA 85719 520/327-2309 520/322-5339 wN i DRAFT SIDE ANALYSIS BUTTERFI ELD CROSSING BUSINESS / PROFESSIONAL OFFICES ORACLE ROAD AT SUFFOLK DRIVE TUCSON , ARIZONA REVISED APRIL 22, 1999 REVISED MAY 20, 1999 OWNER: AGENT: WALTER & JANE WONG LAIDLAW CONSULTING, LLC 5437 EAST THIRD STREET 1735 E. FT. LOWELL, SUITE 10 TUCSON, ARIZONA 85711 TUCSON, ARIZONA 85719 520/327-2309 520/322-5339 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE PART I - SITE ANALYSIS A. EXISTING LAND USES 1 B. TOPOGRAPHY 4 C. HYDROLOGY 5 D. VEGETATION 7 E. WILDLIFE 10 F. SOILS 11 G. VIEWSHEDS 11 H. TRAFFIC 13 I. SEWERS 13 J. SCHOOLS 14 K. RECREATION AND TRAILS 14 L. CULTURAL RESOURCES 14 M. AIR QUALITY 14 N. COMPOSITE MAP 14 PART II - LAND USE PROPOSAL A. PROJECT OVERVIEW 15 B. PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN 16 C. EXISTING LAND USES 17 D. TOPOGRAPHY AND GRADING 18 E. HYDROLOGY 19 F. VEGETATION 25 G. WILDLIFE 27 H. SOILS 27 I. BUFFER PLAN 27 J. VIEWSHEDS 28 K. TRAFFIC 29 L. SEWERS 33 M. WATER 33 N. SCHOOLS 34 O. RECREATION AND TRAILS 34 P. CULTURAL RESOURCES 34 Q. AIR QUALITY 34 R. OTHER 34 P, LIST OF EXHIBITS EXHIBIT FOLLOWING PAGE I-A. LOCATION MAP 1 1-A.1 (N) & (S) AERIAL PHOTO 1 I-A.3 SURROUNDING AREA LAND USE 1 I-B.1 (N) & (S) TOPOGRAPHY 4 I-C.1 OFF-SITE HYDROLOGY 5 I-C.4 (N) HYDROLOGY 5 I-CA (S) HYDROLOGY 6 1-D. 1 & 2 (N) & (S) VEGETATION 9 I-E.1 WILDLIFE 10 I-G.1 & 2 (N) & (S) VIEWSHEDS 12 I-H, I, J, K TRAFFIC, SEWERS, TRAILS 13 I-1.1 SEWER CAPACITY 13 1-1.2 SEWERS 13 I-L. CULTURAL RESOURCES 14 I-N. (N) & (S) COMPOSITE MAPS 14 II-A.1 REZONING REQUEST 15 II-B.1 (N) & (S) PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN 16 II-D.3 (N) & (S) GRADING 18 II-D.5 (N) & (S) MITIGATION 18 11-E.1/2 (N) ENGINEERING / HYDROLOGY 19 II-E. 1/2 (S) ENGINEERING / HYDROLOGY 20 11-1.1 BUFFERYARDS (N) AND (S) 27 II-1.2 BUFFERYARD DETAILS 27 II-M WATER 33 • BUTTERFIELD CROSSING SITE ANALYSIS PART I — SITE INVENTORY This Site Inventory identifies and describes existing site characteristics and conditions. Development opportunities and constraints analyzed herein serve as the basis for site design and a preliminary development plan. The property is divided into two units separated by six parcels spanning 720 feet, on which four office buildings have already been developed. The north unit is a single parcel of 1.31 acres. The south unit is comprised of three parcels north and south of Suffolk Drive, totaling 6.47 acres in area. Many of the exhibits are set up to depict north (N) and south (S) for clarity. Where appropriate, sections of the text may be similarly divided. I A. EXISTING LAND USES 1. The site is located in the northwest quarter of Section 36 Township 12 South Range 13 East, as shown on Exhibit I-A.1. The property is on the east side of Oracle Road, a major arterial and scenic route serving the northwest side of Tucson and Oro Valley. 2. The parcels are presently vacant. The aerial photos show the parcels in their present setting. 3. Exhibit I-A.3. shows the parcels as well as land uses and zoning on all property within one-quarter of a mile. The Buffer Overlay Zone (BOZ) impacts the north parcel and the larger south parcel north of Suffolk Drive. North Parcel. The CB-1 shopping center to the north of an unbuilt 20 foot alley adjacent to the north parcel is intensely developed, and the closest use is Jack Furrier's Western Tire sales and service center constructed on up to nine feet C. • / I'INAl. ci> Saddle Brook \ ` i _ - \l l�/ - -—LsAD COUNTY Catalina r.J \`�'// 1 J �' I '` 1 l i/ %"I`� OSER a ,` \� // i ,I I �ttG'1ia Sun(-itt o ..���\ 1/ Ritneho V istos, )- WILDCt : i ' >/ zx sc, o -- —'::::.‘1.4 : % p / ' S ( I - _'Mt.Lemmon = -0 ' /' ��//1!� 2,//'• W MOORE ROAD x a4 iAll :�._.; ........... � •�•.�, _�, Summerhaven /,/, 11/ a s /// i \_/Evans Catalina.. t �, j ���1`�� � Soldier Camp j ``__ LL' ROAD �Tz F.. � L -�" • -, i\\ \1/1 .l/, -- r o .r state i = /,// /////i/!!)1 \`I r/////``.0 ``'�`4M Bigelow �j r/i I,t\\ M • INO DEL NORTF s NARANJA ROAD ---- i�, ' Park / /, I I //i > r.- // '/ 1( ,,,, ,\i/, HIGHWAY LAMBERT zp• c LANE \CORONADO i, 111 NATIONAL FOREST — c o aC �A�• r• \ I o _c i ` 11� ��� tl//, :/7I• ` /!1\ ��\Ii6. : •. ,• ��_�� N --Oro _; �1At. Kimball= ` I r t / e r i/ ,..:._ }t/� Niputhne OAD OVERTON ROAD �. ��� /,.. .\�� ' 1/i/III I `t =7% �Mtft, Valle ,. a aro ( 4 PkROY ROAD • - ROJ ECT LOCATION \,;Lra!&snake Pk.�,%�/1 _-��r';;,��� • `, TARIIFARMS :x a a� • / - / 'I\' tt I1\ _ %//\ ) I// '4 // A� 'PO. a �� ,/ // -t; it / 0 % /// j: !,inIk Z ��, s f 4/ '/ it 111',II'!/ ;:; \; tf//' , ///f 1 '/ iif ROAD 4//1L�.! �1 ..1 /,i 1tr/�:%kT• \1 //! //., /I111111 _� ,h • _•' o o `P�y L� 1 i l *i�Th�imb/e Pk. •\ 1/ f " 14,4 OR.AN •*VI Z ROAD '/NE DRIVE . o • // l / •iy�/.,//2 l‘�`//�li `�� 0 TOAD `' R/ 2 .K.--SUNRISE DRIVE / //// / t// •` o a ¢ >� �-- o_.1 oho _�... - - '\f,Agua `� T•U� cc Q Foothills o }o o ,� '. ! `,�Caliente- OE ERRO ' � ' R/V SNY1ER'" �� °C ROAD �� ��JIrHi11�:? i aP o z ROGER o �,D 2� U P r z ¢ ///1\,- .44 1.- xt.g O •`••' o ' ,...1•.. Re OAO CLOUD RD: P\ c g_�///j J �� --- AG' F1 LOWELL ROAD LPG fT IOWEII ccii ROAD •_,_! I CtO� Clj)�:1;o ".' r,`�MIRACLE �rz c> \ ' °� �'9•A0 • H a < \ m �rTANOUE anque.Verde �� ��. �ONWOOD HILL kl1 ¢ ROAD vi �T,qN /VERDEROAD �' %�� TUCSON fF . -�.SS ROAD SPf EDWAY`\ N BOULEVARD •' I _ _ aNy/ Si ARYS , a ' o c • c co a a z ;.`\.\t. i i -lie ROAD 'D m 3 ,, c -� CONCH.SS t n- BROADWAY cn ' ' \a vh BOUL VARO Cl 31 \\ Will ♦ za m zo z • W 72ND • lire— > r c, \\ `\ I 1 i t L.. il J Z G ,a 2 c•' W, � STREET C � � a � `� \,1 L. n i out a .o J m ,. \ \\ \,1 1//� 36TH o >STRE `� «- ® t —r,'' L _ W Tucson N� L' a GOLF LINKS`\9 1 W SAGUARO Wit_ ;4 ate IESCALANTE z • c ROAD = , 86 Z o z21,111tx d 4_ /,,NATION OAO I VINGIONt 'OAO IRVINGTON r ROAD• ///5 cc 4 WdDAVIS-MONTHAN N.. i1 c W > �IDREXEL ROAD, I I OREXEL i ._._._.//._��/1/y/'7I I � '��Ii _ AIR FORCE BASE ROAD r `• '// Ti ROAD - VALENCIA� ROAD �� 1 •POOR AN�RD\ _ ...r- •� U �4� W . R/A CRC E'I` <' ;- is ; � TUCSO a \ ' 1___ i ROAD` �. . • N Not To Scale ADL&A EXHIBIT I-A. 1 LOCATION MAP BUTTERFIELD CROSSING 1- f' Cali t [ t t- x ate_ - ` _ i r i f r 4^ 7 { f o . 17 . :,,,:qtti„..-?" " ' r,'"A„.,,...0 ' -''' 4.-..--t-- . , .., - - .,,t , . --44-„ ., ,. -,:;•di___ -- - .':-.,-'-'.fr-; , 1 -.,-- /-__ rt„..0.4,,,,-,.. -, . , 1is4 r . ,,:-,',,,, ,,I, 'y. ;7';:t,I.:i';',.:--,.1 t -ire, i--,.;-'1.;;;,te."';:si.T,'''--'')4(' 'irtil -..._.=..--1-.. '7-7- ' P y 4. S3& 9l. .: t to-. e: awn r* ®® l f= • i r '' T�j _ i 1 ���x� a� �'tf iw; - t yloolie,..r.,_.lit..,.,.4. ®.d wac, 8/iti + J ( .• y1 ra .....�K3 r '•',-4.- "yam. r 9 �,i x { y ' _ .. .roc. i:ep>•.JW&'a. '1 '! ,h-:.t g ,Y ems" aY; -3"'' .4 1.... d rq41. r Nd 7+� `�F pY ,z-; , ,. ,.;,.‘Q--, • ; ... a'� a(` r w �r � a tom b !+1 ( 'Y. .{ t-° J t 1 St x 7 r. K a u lyd` J 11( - - t� 1 ti ' -d ' — , .. ,.. • --, . - ' r .r' ,s 4r, _. N :., ,- r -w hl + ly =�' - M: • P..'-=',-23 ii, 4`- -7.-'344.- c !-11_,,t'%, , ' ,.,"1 ,- \''' ,b, • .V X : -.. -- 'i'••,-- - -40% • : -- I- - ' • -4, �Y_ M( 5 .' j 'R%. ^A?.a+ �j 4 fi, i d 1 :,Z+ d {{.. ,,, �t-L c �.— y�1 d .��,as�• � � j.ti l PPii .` ,'... ! 1 �+.' > P ` ''h ....-•,+d �, 4, r,.. 1" ,. � F '7r� .� .'4 a C t y' tt, , !rti , ,, , _ fA X L t [ S M t 1 Y,' Ufa. S , ,, ,f. —_ r � � .. +fir.�,4 • tD.' s.` ` S�. �•`,� .r l j 1 L-, d &_ �� .'.� :..L1. , i?ll-. y x 7fd J a �. 1 1 1 '� t tea �"' Z r;r + "--. 1. s� ,} •} R,� �,} s'g, 4 �y x �i. .. 4 ,� • r S+ l. '4.4.., �� � � �" � . +1st :, • � �_�,&� t., x�1 t ,7 1 t' ,•� �..» r _ ,. 1 f>•:;i"k a ,.y,,,, .it',..-' v( rr. j .... 11::' •:_sil,.`.* , .*::',..„:„ 'vb..',.*,y4r.ey'ff, ' ,''' ft-','-'-'.,.lir....,,, ▪ c _ .. •, yam.•. i . ''‘.0.„ '1/4 , Lt: it it* c Ly _ '�` •- �- so 'fit. �, _, F •sY F ,y... '4 _..�{.f -" -..'.:: Fes,(.�:i i• '*;t It d ... .'ri .' - J.!♦ _r-.f F- �� k' • 2'^�- .� f.,. :�s"" •r-0N4 .. -r A Sca lao' EXHIBIT I-A. 1 (N) 1998 PHOTO AERIAL PHOTO BUTTERFIELD CROSSING MNI...... .......111.• - •i. /1: : ,.. ,e1,,,,, ...,..;, ... . ,. • . : i r.,, ;,.,--mirt,,,,tt. -1, i . -.4.‘, : i' ,''' '''''-'4 4.'''.1i•--;;;„: ' , •r•.• * • • --,.••,,l s.- - ,•.• ,,,,zo••.. _:-.••;,'„,.--,..`.,‘„,..-----tr.„-:.••,'--,--,";-`1,--1 ,, ,,,,„,.,,, ., . 04,„ • 4.: , ., ...., ,r •.• : ,- .i-t='•-•'••• • ' 4F";‘,4-4-L•Tek‘••••-•.i,•#;; . '''' ' "h- " -----• .••-• k ' • "1-,,, • 7.' ,' ' flOtt'i 1 1 1;2', --•.. - sy•--1••.. ,,•••••4-. ..-----",. '- __ . ---. - .--.i./.-; - ' • • , -,1.'`i., ''1' " ' )--''''•; ' ' 1-",.••••=-=‘''.' 1,,, ii-41,'''''','. ,',.!'-.'''''' •-'..,::-VLTI,';.,?1 -,$)--; PlirillAil 0111 - , 4 ..),• r, , ‘.--•• x.,:.-= .:", tit i r. • -",,,, irt.:-•,?.,,,,•.':',,,,,„.: ,'„?,..,,.•,i,:-;:;:•r,-•-."-•'-:,-; ' '- . ". ; ,.. „-.-7-..,,,,.,. 'TN,---..1' -_.„,,•'•'•'•!'• ,,rip! Ir. . , - • ', j - , T. I '=-::,•!`. ' ''--- ''''-;'. ---'', ' I:. •-; .....r-74li.'' -..!,....;je. ,-'- ••.; ',.iit. -••' '•; -. ' '•• ".. , —,:„. i , ,". ., ,_,-,-•,--: i ..,-,-.. ,,,_,„.4,-.r ;-.1.41i..-::;.?...„--„,f,-,-.,.4.4--,•.',, i ., • ,•tsi,i,• -,,,,•*::•. 4...i: . ..}--- -, •: i • ,,,,,.'..,.'f,-,• i,-- ' I r i',•-•1:•'-, .....,*;:-4...; ''4V!'• . . '-7'''Vtlje•i '..-4#:'`N.. -- 7- • ••• •' tk. :'`...-."'-7 •-, '.. •-• • , •,-,,,,'' , 44'444•- 1' `'.' ,... .. ,r - .:'..• ' -'..,4rr,10#11,1144, . .'• ..'4,- .- .1-.'1, • , .4.-,,..;:.s.-.: ,. ., '-.`', 1 A...0. r,.4?.?:,, ....:-'f: '• .*i_-__ 44- '''''' '4t-,:,-,:•I' lit .- •••••••''.,-• ',-' ...,,*1 - ;(1'.'7.`',4,-i. t',tr - ':''"' *.•'-','. °. - 't-' -'-r- .,,.. . ,...,gt,„ 2- '. - -5 : 4''''-'.. -...r.} -, ',"... i ,... • 4'114::';'''-..:_,-,1 1 ' • '•• , •- . -- "‘,1.':"I ,.• • I f.. ,....-,_.- •* .iNti• •'t N.- "*--.;••••• 'llit -." • ' ' ' '; ,' •' ' 4•'41- . . ''. ' --'1'- .1 - t: 44'' _- •-•• l'' *1' '''''.4 ''' Ac '''' 44.%• -• 4 , ' ',t.,*,., 4 --,, .,,,i,..... ' • * -: :, -f!,'---- f;-‘',..!. -; ;._-.3.., kr,!::*,:-: ' .., '.. -. ...A;*** . .. ": ' .'41•, - "1/A. -• - '''''; - '' ' 1- -'• • •,-:'• 44'.'. ':*•'' ''''.1'): .., , .,,,, : , - ...-• .!, 1,-- .;. , ,,, - - .:,,„,-.; --,.-.'.-4... .r.:_:„. '..• .-.., ., ..--.,.., .. ,.._-=:' i pf,-.: t ---- _ -., , - ; ,:;'1.-,..... .k4, ,0..ki,-; 11' - , ;'..' 8 -v,-,-. • .:1,.. . ,r,...,„::•..1, .....: r.c .. - i ' f, _,-,. -. -•.‘„-• r, , •k,z4-it vit-t ' • = "'AA,' itZVt. -,,'„, '.,,,Ay.' ; ,- •,.,-,,• •A1,..•..• <-: '..,. • • -- ' ...". • - ,-.',1-.t.:‘ ,,..,-' I' _ _ [ , . .1-, -1 -..t ,. ••,co-;0 -' , t ,,,, -., ,,, ,•.4- ,' i •' , . •••.z ..,-,4:-,• -4-t4- `- ,ti ,•.,44 , ,-.':::if.t•-.7,, - , •.---- ' t 7.' '0,4,',-'"-,'--' .'-' , ', 14• . 4, •-. • .,,,...-,„...1 :,, .r :r...., .• ' .. ... ' • ...A' 24,, ' -tle'''''.,,,,;...;•-. ' -,. '-. Ii.:4t,le. ''-.....‘. 4.4 • --,'1,4 j'-' :...,1' , •.1 - -1..!...', - ' ,.' ' ', ‘'‘.. -,.... Z 3.' .-' m 1", ive,lati.. •-••.. -s; - •',.- 1 - ' C'Ili:i..:.'. . '''''-'''' r -4*4 '!' . -1,!., , 0,'-7 • '-. 4.- *.••, ‘,lt - - 1 •-4 ',-,-..-,--• -i.',: t g'.1" ' , "'" : ,..* _ .v . ...f. '•N'.. _.'-,' %,,,,_. . 4 ...'''..' .p.'''''t1^. ILL-. •• ,q.'''',.5,-'1' r-' ' . `...,. • ..-2 .44'ty,...,.14,.."' < .'-' 144,,,IL'l'S... '''''' 4,4 li 444 S. . ' '' --y ,. s,-,_ ' ... ''''.-. •:-L- -* *'L4'.111-'''''''s ,., . ;15-4,.'_,/‘."„,..• '-'.:7•: •::: -• t;',' , ;, ' '• It '.,. ,, •••,.,‘ .7-,4,v : , ‘-- --- ---... .1 AT,„ , - I- A , , -..5:- ,:- Alp.,...1,"' • ,,,,,,,• ,„,,',... .• . '4,,,,,..,4* 4'"`;',..*#... .. •-• ,-; IF,‘ .'" ' .11)".•* - •,Z. '.klY4'-. I,'.'r.i'',.,-1.',...,.....-,si ...f..„ 4.:-:i .„' i',:-.--..• -- , ••..y, ,,,•'''.-. . ..,---:., , ., , -,,,.....ge •,,.-,....,,... ..,,,,A....*•g‘t...k•-•••,: :• - . r'-' - . 1••-N .•,,,.3,, - ''''.•-• .,,74.;,',.,;,.-..3,'-1`...';'-''''''. .72:?' i*,- tii., . 4:-.i.• 3•1‘.ts• ' "Veitz ...,•4.4..-4,&*;.‘1,1 ' ' - ', . .• ', 'W.,:'.' 5. L-4•,,.': ,.:.,4..i.---..- :,.-•;f:,:t. •i'4`''-:1-. -7,* ---,-:..,47.-4,,,4 -- :. i! -- . V_,''Atk.' . '''' '-''' . ? -47"irr.:iitilii-ei•W•Alf.?: -,4t,. •: • ,...' it...1-,frcki. --7., ,..,-: ,,,,,,,,,':-.5,-,-:',:z.'4i.:,' 7'..:, • Y' -,'',....-.r..-.1 k• l""'' ' •44t, *t ','. ,- . '' .41:4 . ....4-•,.:‘,;:•: .;*• '4:.:ts.',,,;. . - -,,* ....,i,,,,..,;.,,, ,,E.,... ,..e,,,, . , .0.,,,,-„„f„..„.„_,,,..... .-.„ ..., ,,.=;.• „..4. ,,..,„,; * ;, ....... ,, .., . _, ,4,, , . ''''''' ' t'44'4 ••• N ..::,-.':,•-f"rli':'-•.;,.:,..if-i*:'?':,.::'IT- *, ,-•1, .,, 414t144* ' ' i •-•' *i''''..4.-'i''• '4'' • ''• . ' '''''," , -',' ..., : -fC1 • - • '••:. •'-•,* . ••P•.. '14:' ' .' '. *••., ..1.'.‘ ,, : r IF ... , 44 " ., ':",* r:: ,.. *.i.!-;"1-1.;•-: *".,,;:,,,,V -,•:.•,. -:.*A•. ' • . 0.1• .• 1 .'-.•. :.1:-.1';•.,14,f-i•'t.',..•-'•,.;t*,.-.! '4';t,..,..,* b. • - .-,,.. '4 • • .,..., '''.•-•••-'1,:, i' •,`•%SA,.•,0•;7•.,1 . . •. •'. . • ::,. _•-z'T 2,..,-,slir,,,,,,,r,,:-.,,i i s ., ;I- 'L4--ti' 4 * , ,..•Oat', i•- *'1-,-kt:,`''T1/4. i rst,-- • • „,•.. ,• •-•'•r. ' - -,•3p' ; - -'.--Ii-I--.=.4-,A1,, ,If•-•,t.:1. "7,,f,--"„- '-.. • ,- ,.!4! , t• '-' .v '-' ... , . .:,,..,--,.. ..Ht- -,!-F-4-.2. -.--.3..-0,--•_ --4,.',..,„/41 i 'I' ''''*II • ' ,4'". , •• wtei41.4*--'' ‘01.*,43:''' ' 1'4 -:,4'. ." •,,i4.-24- r' ' - :4--,,7.•.:,, J.,•,,,x' T';,-., -.-,•,,,Ef, -- -I. -• .... -, • . ' •.: _ .,I....•.- ,- Nif\.,jai, .` ‘,.-.;41r,7: '''.': . 't.,..,,'• i• .'. :' '2''5,.., ',- Jul,- - ':- ,.- r.,.3:,,f, ..,.'.,,„?,/..Ft, -:... :.•:, :.-.1 ,-,..:, , ..k-.,.1 . ,,- , '4:, - , ',- '---4 -,r"1,' - •'''.niStik.No. - : .''''tkwt - 'SAO, - -Ali. ' / V. ,,,,4111,I.:. .-, ,t,i..... jti. e,.,?,::,-•' !..' ."4:, . ' , ''•k-,„.-,:;'-,--t.,14'',-;.:.'i:2,14,.,.,3-..::,,-i,!'l,:-,..-..".5-',%'.I..i,.•..:*:::..-?',:,!:::::1;".,,,..,-'.;.,:. :-'-•.,-"'.A;.4.'.,I k:''j0-1'''-,','sJ....-';1"1'''A,",-''-;'.1'4,V1 1&-*,,-,--''':-.':-' ' ',-,-•.'-‘':'.''':.--'•O•W..e,'•--•'-.' i --.--.4."...',., -. *''0'-,'*4'3.-.k-.-_,'-'4-.''‘''''*•-7i1,' ' ' 4)ti ,, • .., • ,.-- :,:, .'•-r-Aui — ' - - -- '1?' f.',,,, ri.,,.,;:-1.,,,i.,-.,:•.1.,....i,..4,-..::i.r.; ',. ,..c.'..!:2...,',.;,i,1-;!,'(,,,,,a.- ,., ,. ..,..,. f31,. -,0.411/4_, ,, •.,_,..4,,,,:-.. ,- •'-',-,,,,.-..,1-, ,.•...,,•: -,,es .A.' •, .„••.„--1,4*4' . - •,,, + I ' . -'4,-,X.;ii./-,.:::..:Y.,;;.:•.t-z•s;ft: '; .-,..f.",P',-'tl 1r.4st..7,'.''.7,-i.i'-4:4:•-:4::-,..4'.-!i.i',-'.-.1,_t-',-',,-.!:',,,1!•-..I;..'-'..s4-1';.,::-1--'EI,-.1."_'-...,.4,4.4:,,,::-.-'.,:',.i,.',..',',tN.;,;,,,-„,,-•...,.-',,4,.-,.4.:.,-.,.,,,':4-",f.';:'.,,. k4‘-.t‘'-L4! ..T-i,'i't -,. -.',,:'•.-,.-.4.:r..• .-,..-.,-'.:',‘x:.f,`...,.,4-r.,.!,-t,7".-.;:.,.'..(;..':',,-'.--..,c',•.,.i-:;%:'''1c.,--''-,.,-'''',,"-,-,1''-',=4-":t--,-:..:.,,.4,`,':'.-'.-'..%...*..-.',,..'','4s,,''.,'•),-_.:.--- '.,...-.'`-0'-,-v..-,1:'5,-*,".,,•',*,i r,',--,•',.-, -,-'-'.-,•'.-',,.-'-.`,,.:-;.,-1'-"4'.'•.-,-.'„,''‘..'1-1.*1',.-.-N.•-',?,.-'‘--,,.'.,>.-.,.,":,..`,•-,A,"t.,r-‘t-';.y'"-i-,4'•i,,:--3:-"•'*1*.',:3-•,.4''_T•',,./'''.','-'!,-.44-',aA,N,,,,114*5,•,'5.':0,',t',-*.,.%•t-,''--V_i,-,::;n''.0,.4 A'.,-.,*;'?r.-4.,'4.;4-,-.''','.--4-:.-',-'..•-:.,'4.'-'.'.,e'-;`?...-,t'...''1',,4',*1•-.4,-''•,„.7:-,'.,4''„-'--'-i*''-‘.-•''..‘-.•''...,,;.'.-'',;:,t'-.-.,:-.i-','',-•Y.,''','',.'Ca‘,-- i 7 1 4 A „,-t',,`'1.T.,i..l,.-J•',',:,*4,i,e'7:.'.s'''''.'.4',--1'444_'",-N..17.;-.-,l4,-,",!,._4c.:,.A*.-,.%*'.,,,-.',,y-ml•-'-,-i*-t,,;,,A"'-,.t,..-,'.',,'-,:.*,,•.4.,.-,,-,'„.,'.'.:.-','s:''-,,._,'I -,.„'.-.•..:,.'-:,,.*"...,...-'•,..'4,,,1,‘.%,,,,;....4.,'.,A'!4'e'.'•.,1,'*'','''.`3-'1.4,,,',--.'-r_4.-'.,._*',.4,-.,-,'-t-,-•l 7.V 1,•,*.*,,,- -'-4,-.''',,,,"-•.,-,',-i,•'"-'*2«'Isf ;V-*,s,,,,'•,,';'.1/42,,":,,_',-A-‘-',.--..`...3•' , q„ , .' ,. *: .-. .v. ,*I . ••, •-•,".....,..4, -. '_if::iirp RI• -‘i.,.:.` :,.•-•',. -%,r,',.7.,-,., ,,, .=,• ,. . ._ . ..„, ,,,„, •,.„„81,..-, ' '-;„,'---''.—'il. ..,,..--4,..... .,-,,..-w-r..'-'--sr-...,'.'- :,,,,h.,-,..;Alg,_ . •,_.= g -.1!---7.;;'7:-=_:2 -._,.,-4-,,,..1 .I.1--..Z ..--",-;',.i....?!" ,. .-f.:.4:Tr.-F,g0.14:•,*,,:. '-',.'-'; :,;;','!i"'--,-'''4, ''..--'. ' .,, ,- •,,..., - - , „,,,,,,,,, v,....,„.2--.„.....„,.....,-,-;:t.,„„_,,,,.,,,,N, z" ,„---.4.., . .T7;,r-,•.,..i -_ . .......,,:,...,--.,.,F. '..,:,e.'.-.•-• -4,1:,!,;::,..::!;_sij...".,..,;-',. ,,'"t'••-,.rI. ',•-•.' !,.'7;e4ci--;___:'--„..*,.., --:„.i.,,;„-ri.7giz.iii.?..*:-.Fw,ii:;;V:r413 :.4*44-47N-LIZ' '-',..:',,.;,,'!"A•tk,, -.-,21,P,41:' .''.,. 'Z'-'ir257. 5;,„,.; • '::::'-... '": .. ' -,,:ir.•;":„;',,q-,i..i..,ifit *P;'14•••• ,,,R1T1:,..!...;•,:z•;_iwt- 4,,,. .-••;9&,-... . ..,-,•:-.-..-_,y--ni.-ixi,::-:...:,--.:' --., •;. •-•,.,.,2-•,,,-,,....:', -. .,.-#A-.- •-c•• 1-.-`4 1 1 „:3,--•• •- ,.i.-;;:,,'.7,--..!,:i,,,:,;:...7.-.:y,fl.;,.,7•,:f,,,,,,,,-,,,..,„.--•,,*: •;,io!j...-.-f.;-r•,o•,„- •.,,L'.,,,,----N..%;§/t.-.7•';:_.,, • ''.---7,-r--%‘ --- .4.,..2-.:-,-);_,.,*•-*,,,i-J-,wa-,-,v. - .... . 4._ •-,,,..•,•.,,.1 .' ..,_,..,,,,,,,,..---_„w3-.,,,,,;.1-.3._,,,mx..;,-,./-,,,v.-:,,, ,,.--_..t.-„,,6- ;7-,,,-•. _ . - ,-. .-t_-..• 'N• -- 4-,2,-e k -'' '''''- • • ---''''''t",3, ' '14 if 3-t''-'11'. ' '''. • ''' • '4; ,.4 - •''4.4. -,.' ' "P..ft-r..::'Tqlf:',Vi.V.: ,•-re'.. . '*•-• '''• i;"•4',.`,.,04. 11_!, 4 v, ,, 's , A•, ,..-..,,,i,:...f_,ZA.,-,-.),-;„'.I.;',,,-:-•.:.--4,411.1f, ''''' ''':... ' .,,r-• ..il )..z...)--'*,:....S...„7',:k.,4;,-;-,17i ,--,i-4-----..;_itj--'4',7,1.--iff-4,.' ' ' -(' -1... *'. 4 ...:,-,!_z,,, . _ ,,, ,.....,iii.. , ..,. ,,,,, ...„.„...., .. , .. . , • ..,7.... .„.„ .„ __ .:,...„ ....ww, r-iii:'-', "t:.:..-34- p.4:rti-- .i„,t.- ,...... ,-,.., ...-.,..-:, -; ., -.. ,, . :404e, t„„il L .,,.. I...i,..4. -...4,41. .-.•.'.'--t-.4 .,.., 0,-...,J5--•.2,-, ,,„- ...... . ...it- ,,,, --,,, -45C-''r'''''''-t• ,., ',.;q,,,•.1‹. •. .t#• , z*,, ,,T).-4,•,,'-',',..-...-**1.-.Y ,',_„ 4. -,..,,...:,,,,,,.,,,,,, , 4 r'''''#.-„:',,I7V -‘,•. 2 ,,,..t.lt.:: „,,,,.,,i-iti'.1, . „,,k.,:,,..4, •• , , --.,,„. -...,z,t,„1,,..„ -:.-„.4,- I. •:.,,,, ' ..f*,-, AP-$.,.4c,-. , -./. -klg--.11----tui'i;;ti-,',,i,•',..' -'•,1.4. ' ii'.4'; -4.,,,` APW4... Atiitiv . •-•, ,' .' ,,,—, I „.Tr NN.i. ...."3.4. ,-1,,..,,,,,,v•-. ,t.-,:f.: -r,.-- -- ..;- I'`;1, --lig':!-eRiA.-:-',A,44'.'.1;,. : t-:;i'' -.,-.. ',..' 4.38,Av...„,1%._.;-' ' ...1k4in,',,:-,',3. , ., - ''.-11 '.14,:iii*•. ?11,. v. - !::&k:4,-.-#:-,..;. "'-,.;,-,...;-!7''-. '„ ,.. ;,r,, ::-..2- '',.;.A'4,7..,.. F,.' •-;.";;,,-g.,,,,'• c_•-., --.- jit ,, .,.4,..7.cdr,.1.,:....,,,,,,,,, ,,,", 4. . .. „---.t.__ _„:„..fripf. ,.; :_: , . r..-: ... .. :,--;,:....zt.-4,-, T , S.,- : 1::,' te- ,,,,,•;,_,,,,„.', . -'4-4•,..•.- .•,,. i• . ,ip, '110,14.f.'-7.-,- ,-_.',i,-,P* •iI9_-' .,• - ',. ‘.- ''''•- "et. II- -i I- '42:-'` 'l''''r'''''-?•-1::- ' .. ' '%..., -.1-'.0'-: -',1.--:.",i' :, '''.::-:;4--'' , ---1- '.•' - - . ' s'..,,,,,„ •:-:ti.--',''' '. ''ilt " 41.4.•' ,, ''''., ' i;„':- ::.,Igt. ,2114' 't.:I v % poi;.; .".L-.'4'''"': '''''''h-""" ..,P'' '7 1....:' 4';',4,. 4 • !..'i. ..,c-,, ,'--- '- - .].4, ..-..,,,,,..:).e ‘440, ,i-„,,,„..,71.,-„,,,,,,,-' 4,I.:, . .,r. . !alt.`',:''' .....17`, ..Ii4i,:-. .i.'-ip'' '' '• '‘,..-.. '--:. ,A4v.,,„,..•:'IA',yN.'.,,,.,I.,- . •4'A. V i 44,'--- -:- V' • .• 1 „*.i. ,-3.. .','• '' .„ '-•3,-. .- -,',.", -,,,' „, --,.- • . -su-N`S. • ..,.',..''. . '. rvat. ,,. • _, - , : .,,,,:i.•,, ..,,,,,,,,-;„..:,,t..:•-,t4,, 7 .,4,_,a „, :,.., -,,,,,,,,.- ..- ,' ..,.44- .•••' . ,;.:41‘-,•••••,''r•.•-•- I\ r 4- .1,4. , • '.. ' 4'i-All'.-' ,•-_, zo 4-1......' g..;__,„" ..,-":.:'.4 7.;,..'. ' -47 , :'--4 i• .; :, 4--,---, ' ,. ' '',--*.;141!",- -''''."• . ,-...."1..•,' '`;'•:mt"P*, :- .'''- --• . 't, , , -• ' '''' r• - ••• , -;‘, •...,..- -...e„, .'':,... . ."-A,-.4,:1 ;,."' , ' ' k. „4',- -• ,..,,01'''‘, -k0 .z•*tat-44N,,• • , .....,,,,..».40',,, •,,,. .,,,,, ltwili.. ..? .,. , •, ,o, . •••'• .,., :14,.' -• •.:•;Y:'-',4:. ,-.;•, ..'----'„„,.: •- ••• ..•'''.:•4.-••tv,r;-'‘ ' -' , ..,,,,•,•-•-• ' ' , ..,....,. - 1,.. •' -.,,,. .... r' ,• A, -'. 1.• , • ,,,,,,_-"• • - -:,; .1-." •", ,- ,.--..-4. '. - - -,, • , 1.__ --,- - --',-,-,42 - ,-4,41...--,.. - •,..,.,.. • ..,- 4.-A , ,-- a -• ,A••=•• ,‘-,-• I •,"'• l 1 II "•:.....74' 4,6„ '1;.!•V'T'• - ' ,..-....,,,i,7 .,, -•,—•;, -Jr- .i,:. .:-,..,,f1f-...•..- -..4.,: -,, __.- :\_t-- ., .-,,-_,.. , ,,,, ,,,,_-.i,,.., „,,, ,, -, ,_ , - ....4r• . .ifivii .i...„.r.,.. , .....„ ':•it.' )„, ,,..-,„„.. • .4 . ,' ' --.'pr,-;, 'N, =',..- 4' .. *."s.'0 A''- - .-4:*`. -t,• -,,,. c 'e •-•- * - V? • -'4.--m, -1 ' 4"‘I'-,. ,. '' , ''.. : -tic,:-_‘ _ , ' _- - . 0 , - } •---*;,-•-•'‘;',WArP:k....*:,-,4-, .,.._-• 04 c_. ----..: f... •,,-,-.---4*2:- ', : - "' ., -t • - ..- 1, .., 74 -...., . -. .. :sr.?p. .. ...,,,„.4. ,• g•. if A .4' -' • •--y: 1';....":4*- t. 4,4,,:le, 4.••-- ' it',. ' - t- —--,/, • • '•'. 1 1 ,.--4.-.42*7-- ,1,7, ,,,,4"- 4...!-, ,."''-40. .,,,, I.I.;,1 11100.1 - ',... . .-- a,,,,44,, ' : -. .•:;.,1--..,-'',-, ',ALL ,,,,416,...-io-='''... - ,i,...• li't --Fr". '-- -. ••- - ..t• - - , . ----..4,-_ ,-,. . 4 ."--t ',. : .,: '' * - ' '." • - (S) ............. N Scale: 1" = 100' A 1998 PHOTO EXHIBIT DEfilk BUTTE IIFIELD CLIP-AHO- 1TO ROSSING p r • w r .w .w r Fell...41AA�� 1�1 1 11 � � :��i�ti - r • -- -.1vrtr___J i6m4--44 i n 8 I • I - .. :041,11 ./« s v SR fr.r:. •'• Y Y r M. 'lbL• OjS.P.IllihldIS PI.-. IIyqD . aik rhappia co ®12 Q c • , . . SR N - ,. ME - - d VAC b i, 6,prit c- 0 C C. ~' `\ R° �— ._...._ - MA_GEE RD. ---� —►- UAGE --aummommmom T f•• .. VAC ..�,, a7 1 a ik_ii, r------- SR - - dom C6 pi-- "� ,v - SHOPPING ■` 1 •.• T gpAR M i ' \<!,--1 NTER CB-1 , - • , Ili ..• CR- �? HOPPING ` /Abb. '1 •.• �- L ' CENTER MIN u Noi ® Q R-1 , -0 i----i —AVC0 in ��-- V; III, i ... VAC ' s / ...ir�A .f. VAC I \ - t eV", .4‘ A - . -Sj .. 4a./,. R VAC (`'AC c •R . SI FOL HI LS. ./o . , ie •. R VAC SUBDIVISION - ,i .. �� • i ._ F( ' .. . \ 00.0 f R I :I I4 MILE 4 O '�/°`, K1+"'- tt7 . z C 4 1- R R / VAC r I • 61 . . . . VAC f s A iraltigh. • . - - 41Ai,MOTEL OFC TR R R• &� • R-I a . R VA' __ VAn. p_.,,,%.str -;f..� R R F SUBDIVISION / - , 4 R •...•c••.. , ; R /9Z • p � •'. rnr� VAC ;: R �� oo. . . :1 TR i R �°�• ;-' t, II" R oFc R �►� r "' R OFC1 R �/� . • 'OFC • .c*A )5,/ I . H• r Cb a . '417 .. 11/A R it lip 41...ri;)-. .. - i N Not to Scale A rA EXHIBIT I-A.3 SURROUNDING AREA LAND USE BUTRFIELD CROSSING • of fill and with service bays exposed to view. The back of the shopping center is also highly visible from the property, and trash, debris and earth and fill has been dumped into the alley right-of-way. The center is anchored by True Value Hardware and Trader Joe's and numerous pads south to north include Church's Fried Chicken, Bank One and Fletcher's Tire and Auto at the southeast corner of Oracle and Magee. At the northeast corner is a commercial subdivision comprised of McDonald's, Econolube and Tune, Western States Tire, Famous Sam's, American Family Insurance and several business offices. All buildings east of Oracle are one story; however, because of its construction on fill, Jack Furrier's Western Tire Center is effectively 29 feet in height. To the west, at the southwest corner of Oracle and Magee, is another shopping center anchored by Fry's and Checker Auto Parts, with pads for Burger King, Eegee's, Taco Bell and Norwest Bank. At the northwest corner of the intersection is another commercial cluster comprised of Bank of America, Circle K with Jiffy Lube, Prudential Realty, a restaurant and Rural Metro (two stories). A day care center is immediately to the west. The Talbert Medical Group is on the east side of Northern Avenue, south of Magee, and on the west side are the Casas Lindas Apartments. Moving south, all land between Oracle Road and Northern Avenue is vacant. This 30 acre site was originally the Watson Chevrolet rezoning, Co9-94-71, and the development concept was recently amended by Oracle Partners to depict a large commerce -2- center including major tenant, hotel and offices. The west side of Northern is fronted by residences on CR-1 lots. To the east of the site is the Suffolk Hills subdivision. Sixty-five single family homes on CR-1 lots are within the one-quarter mile radius from the property. To the south of the site are three vacant parcels of land, one of which is 4.5 acres north of Suffolk which is also part of this rezoning application. Four other parcels are developed with uses permitted under TR: Desert Skies Child Care and Learning Center, A. G. Edwards & Co., Suffolk Hills Pet Clinic and Century 21 Realty /Allstate Insurance offices. South Parcels. Sixty-one homes in the CR-1 Suffolk Hills subdivision east of the parcels are fully developed and landscaped, with homes generally on the front portions of the lots, so that the remaining undeveloped area of the lots in closest proximity to the east boundary of the parcels is essentially vacant. A 20 foot alley separates the parcels north of Suffolk Drive from the subdivision. Suffolk Drive is a 60 foot collector street with 24 feet of paving. Twenty-one homes on CR-1 lots in Catalina Village subdivision lie within the one-quarter mile to the southeast. Rezoning of 30 acres to CB-1 and TR was recently approved on the west side of Oracle Road. South of the property, east of Oracle Road, a three acre parcel zoned TR is vacant and a larger parcel south of it has recently been approved for a 190 room Hilton Hotel under Co9-97-24, Toy-Oracle Road Rezoning. The Northwest Corporate Center is the only developed parcel on the east side of -3- Oracle Road within one-quarter mile of the property. It is a three story, multi- tenant office building fronting on Oracle, with one story condominium offices incorporating "southwest" architecture in varied colors on the east half of the parcel. On the west side of the highway are, north to south, a dentist's office, a guest lodge, a vacant property, a two story office complex, dental and law offices. West of these Oracle frontage properties are single family residences on CR-1 lots. 4. There are no existing wells or well sites within 100 feet of the parcels. l B. TOPOGRAPHY 1. The slope of the sites is generally toward the south, southwest and west as depicted in Exhibits i-B. 1(N) and (S). The gradient of the sites sloping from northeast to southwest ranges between 2.5 percent and 10 percent. a. There are no restricted peaks and ridges. b. There are no rock outcroppings. c. There are no slopes exceeding 15 percent. d. There are no other significant topographic features. 2. Calculation of pre-development average cross-slope is shown in Table 1 below. TABLE 1 AVERAGE CROSS SLOPE NORTH PARCEL 1.3102 AC ELEVATION 2580 260 L.F. .0023 X 5 X 794 2585 316 1.3102 2590 218 6.97% AVG. CROSS SLOPE 794 L.F. -4- • I 2'/ qii f‘I i 1t �,....�.� CawcREtc aria_ qv, 4 I N398' of t9.2. eta , \-\ ---------1 25 IFill , ' te _____) / ...............--c ( 41,4 `,,,..../---1 ',,--:-.„>.d.- I'i f N• Sl N F A ATURESN t 711) y ,� �. ENO SL ES •V m-k- _--_`. j� 2 -~• i 1_0-- - . • lir I�w._. •i. .v fir-• .y_: „r- _._ ..:_ �i�"� t ..�-`_.'`' ,i itipara-Nl • CD 11$1 . :11, 11 .,.....„..,4 r---",,./ ,./' i i'lf----T-1--- .9A . 1 i Y a, r' \,:—.._,i'' \ f l t II •- a 1 � r_ � � lw� /i � i N 2we I WA H _ ..HA N EL- :,,_:), i . - ' __! III x jr ttoexar 699e race toa¢ N Scale: 1" = 100' A CONTOUR INTERVAL 1 FOOT DL&1A EXHIBIT I-B. 1 (N) TOPOGRAPHY BUTTERFIELD CROSSING • • ',Ar, . �SMiAL T 1 -1- Li CO►N.BUILDING , comm.8CILDING\ / r PA ""C,t-1- : . iti . • � st i - C. C --1 "MI Z575 tilM eis falitlit . h/1-5x zs7azlitli IllIlly2,57. {/0_ Oo `E• , E 5°• kilt °' i. N 4 j : I —it s's E s-—-—_, Q 1/411 rl .r ' lit. oE� 1,44 ., �- x 2563.5 iwofr.,„ ip ' v� )! , 0. ,,...., 1 _.. 1 .. /.3 , . i I / 4 .Es. ; / %. - t iviY -vEr 7 1 / o y.r,,, yr/ r.loaz O A i 1 i /I - '`' i / ,t� ti�y SOUTH LINE OCK 9 �� / \ ,/(/ •S Q ,,a \297.17'/ 5 .9 48'16'V _ L1 / Arms '9 I �. SUF F O. , I R. �alr«arblif =. Orar 4 lip_.=:seragi__ 11!„5-,--, ii. 1,7: , :t 1 ,t 4c I ...774I f 11147- W 4,„„m Y , ,o� r 1 A ,,,,,.. . , \\ , (:1 O •IG IFICAN 1:4EAT . ' : 1 \\ 11 )41‘ 11 ,,,,, • I 1 � RES. .• 4:- Jilt , f -,-- \ - ' gap,0 :9. I ww. __, 1 2`'58.7 II \ N Scale: 1" = 100' EXHIBIT I-B. 1 (S) A CONTOUR INTERVAL 1 FOOT TOPOGRAPHY DL&A BUTTERFIELD CROSSING 1‘ SOUTH PARCEL 4.5205 AC ELEVATION 2555 526 2560 1143 .0023 X 5 X 2681 2565 640 4.5205 2570 276 6.82% AVG. CROSS SLOPE 2575 96 2681 L. F. SOUTHERN PARCEL 1.9508 AC ELEVATION 2555 444 L. F. .0023 X 5 X 1177 649 649 1.9508 2565 84 6.94% AVG. CROSS SLOPE 1177 L. F. I C. HYDROLOGY 1. Exhibit I C 1. is an aerial photo depicting off-site watersheds that affect the parcels. The exhibit shows that all of the parcels are impacted along their eastern boundaries by stormwater generated runoff from a total of four off-site watersheds. A small watershed north of the north parcel impacts a small portion of that site. Flow from two other watersheds enters the large parcel north of Suffolk Drive along its north boundary. As all the parcels are in a balanced basin, stormwater retention is required. 2. There are no significant natural or man-made features within three of the above-mentioned watersheds. The north watershed contains an area of dense vegetation defined as Xeroriparian "C", as shown on Exhibit I-D.1.C(N). 3. There are three upstream off-site watersheds with 100 year peak discharges exceeding 100 cfs. North Parcel. The watershed entering the east boundary of the north parcel has a drainage area of 231 acres and a corresponding 100 year peak -5- +. +C..t �'1y�a. .�., ♦ .~J,r.e_ yy-����1►« , 7•'.•!..�'.. A`S'.tii. �' ;4•-•? r•i ,t1n .Ja.-r Z. '...,♦ •+C`S,� `TCrj�+` -••`�'4 • 4,• ••• '�.•• ••. t'•r ~ �4 ,s• : may. +` .... • :`4•..„.:= .�T' c �' • * } _ : `� �.r *y a. �#....• - a Wit`-4. •••-",� i •• rc�:rtic tP" -.. i��f • c''Qayi� ��, �� ��+�.I . i�' �e .. �:..�•• `Ja ,�• 1 +++►�. Q` • ' �• yl1 ;;[ •fir • •. -`• L. . Zs• ♦ •�,,. �• //�, /� •, • • •y. �:`,tit• "!_ ^mow -3< _ :•y-♦•:,,r.• .---r..- v , w,• -* ;•7..:< It' '',* fir, +� + ^- ;.'"v }.Y• ,. '{• 't_• 1-t!'# ii,• , tR .' c� 1'' .. ?.r i,t'ram 1,':'-r • . ' S .. � ;S af.1 `s+j• •• ,. a1; 4 •! .."1 —-. •Y▪'+}►�f•G` �~• ~. � -• r,', rs •- t'" >. ,t• za .• ..-. . � y 4 •, 1 f• �•. . �'�-• ,7, F .t. • •• - �`4.4( ♦{`�!•j-43• • ii • rl. .•[<���'�'F `. s .,jam i t •A ‘'/�1L +�-4.,.. ,. (.a ,Y.'4. �.. ., 'r - - a.. 'C'` ^,� •rt_• .14.4.•A' ". VCA.•„•ctl ;=¢. .• !' ti. ` .{T,. i •f'r 11' "...-iv','.....‘,,••• -.•10-4 4- .'.7'1'''' •. illii, •� ;rj•.s+L Co*ti't °'[! :. jam, '2'' .�.-A%44 ..•s,a�•__ • • • • -'. ►t�"•• ;; •s *. :.: 4, - , • 11 7' '' ''.• -* i' aft:''-'•'•ti •••17.44.••' ' '41' t '• '' t •yIi�i. _I �• .. •• lrr#��• : ` 1 4 •'• t+. r • T •' fir` E` 'r �:i 7 • •s; .. ;�rk•� "S" �"��/'�'"• .'L • r'�•��` '- ...._•r to •.-� -.. -.fs• .�;:. �--L�-,1/4 —1.-4 7' it; � �'.?•',j •- $ `i` - N tx` ram, ,' w,..4 r X''' -� j+� .;• •..„. 'dt+.. t _.,s ',,J . Sa+ • - i lit;'1 1,..:4,' -, ••--. ,• .... •• ,:.•".,;',.4.a4, ?. i...z.fr-rx,„••••..4..•,,,,....•;,-....„ . ,.:C.,-7,.,,,,,.,‘. •.„„ A...AIL-it:. - •• • "' ,„' .--,A„. ••• \- .•le • r • a, • 5, t T 'i ;c n l J1 y ii . 'P'i�s 're 7! , .': s mod' - . •� .. a ♦ �..- '.lt►a P '.. r i` 1 .4 -.--s-Ny.i 2. -.% , -.4 . .44'. •••• - 4%6 Via• 3 .•1 ••s �1 +- - X't :` 1 s X J r,: .'-,'.._,t r-...A"'", 1: '• . . •. • `M s s.�, •, ,►s •.t 1%1. •�► • •� �T'" s• •. .11' . ,e• �~t�� '� 1`'il`•c' Ti►•s .. .. ! Ye ..` is•• �r` •. •1- a ,1?. ',...‘ 4,...,..'11.'..-, ,',..10 ...-. ,..• •-... ,— "4,.-1\• <-,..• - ?:".•*••• 4"......• ... ....... ,....,.k. .• _. .:., 4 r„,.... :if. . 4 „s".•!,...". .•••• f,--.6'• '•4, ...••• ••:.:,3= •.-• ' 's 4' •'.a -. .:%, ';', • •11' . •. , ,•-,', • , ;rf' .... ... It =.* • •. ?-..rf ..•--',,- -4-:. - • •-•••• i.x . . -.-- ,,., ...7-.,...,,--. .4,-. ..• -.,rt. , % . A. ,....r..... . , -ii,! .,: ..,..... .. . t . ..... 40,10.04 , . ..itk 9 •. 90..., =4.s. / •r 1 ' � Z_ $�:.ic 4� lc.. ,w ', ♦ w.! . 9 • 't e• s';•• t•"IIP �• ti,� •. +". >` ....`A',..a. �. ,•1'; 1 r1•' �•+ss ••"� •1111 , 'Y - t•i• • , �..-,,,A:„, • .-Y;_ r.E €,• .'. �-i. '{• .•z� _ *'-Yc 1'V two + -� ,; ;,�- ;� , , �' `1.1`w. •: - •,'tc.. � _L'i j. /1. ..b ,• t..r..0'.• • lr.`5. ••. •-'•+• /1,. .,�1r•y ii ,,,•~ • , 1 i -• • 1 �, .r, • 1 4` • •_I `• •' or 4 .• ' ' •.1„ti7.. �1,•.:'•♦�-e.'.,;•;J+�'! `Ca. _ . ��'t. L�.''��'�.++�:.� �tsi . •yr. 44 ,,,„ .. %.,i,.‘,.., 10 .. , . r „.„.„ .f .,. ... ,,,,,, . i 4:y..el.*.,-,--. - •-: -Fi$"`"*-40 , .__ ... _ ,,,,,,.. .._ . -,. . i'l tr- titi - .t, .q‘1:: • • 3. • 1 •• �-h 1. A,• 1. .! < .� ' ft „+_a �_ t. , ' • 7 ,... IA VI, s ����T, ��• f,� � � •� •°+9'el .,��'.{''_�` '� c��,a t �' t � a -� �� .� .•� �i• ,Q �-•f„ ...i r , f t.� , '11. .y`•••LEYif 'y . r�i�-us `,r .` i.e, - t _ -_ s'c9 1.r-1 J�,'•.•� _ .,:,.a.. •�'1Y 5� 77 y--s• !...r .. ,!. _ 'V ft "r�a -* Y F `yam, _ 7I �.•. '�' 1 • • •, ;Mr•- a •• • -a, t• t j•f- 7u, rI'; _)1 .. • - 1 ik( 7!5 •` �� ^- f "'i. ^_ y 1• �• '. ,ler - 14-...4b....iii, 40,4 ; •• ir,„ ;,...„, ,\ NI • [• , � r � 4,.• /., a. ' r',�1 ;..f,- • •• V. Xt .. y1/� •.til y fij �t - ��� •�. ,. . . j L. ,L.... •,....,. • • +.,. :,.,.. • .,_ ' .•.Ott.,i a, '�� ..,...,,.v.6,,,, ,11: ,i. -....". go•l•-- •• , r,......, ., - }'`Wdet �_ .^jam �. 1 ii '� .• . •4‘...... .,„, . .. . ,. /..,,,..... • ..:.,,,,,.,,..,„. . _ st s •4 -.r-.41.,::.t•...J.4•.,*;;4.:,•,ft..,4 i F oa.'4l1ki,f,,•-A•4'l-?.•‹N•'••• -6:,I..,'.i•:.•"l •,.,r'b.'..1'.'1az1'r-3,,'-"-.I.,,A,•r-•-1,7i e t4i • -+tom - tf •• !�. .� 1 ,';..'t4:•i.s tr'P..a.....J...•...-_.._.,_ .ti. ' •••, .-v_•t'•"•7'. ~i '.,. .• .'.1..'•4-*,,4,",,'-'- ,''-'•:-''I;, -•-•-• •:.•*.r'*.;•- .:,.,.,.,„..'"2-.:S.p.•I'' 1V*-.-..).'• • .rv+ „ 1‘. a ~ .j' r\ ++ /, r 4. l,-.-,••,...,.•.,-:‘...-.4<1 1 S a, !1 •f •( •.\!1 `'.} 1 '!• + '. r— 17>- 'y.! , -i'�� Y p4' ; y. -1 i} _1 i t •- c 0. sr•- as • jj � � • •r;b. r � ' _ - "� � ,--`.• !. a �• i_ . - �I `�i • �ys�y � s �' _ � +• � � `-tip- � l - . • •.' * . ' 4 Z. •.:6., .1010 a-4•rija-,,, --,..,,„ . • ... - ‘,.. --,.... . _,,....., N . . 1, .... :,._._..,. .,:_,....44, _ _ ;•,-,,....t......,, . ..„ 44 -..... ..,- - ,rk...r-:, -,.. ,. ‘ ,--:- kw- ,.. -,, - , ...-. , ... .,74,1 -......:..... ,---, ...... ..---....., _i %Iblage-"T.* r:LI-- ". ' - .: - 44'4 7-"1/4----74:. •'••••.--....,____'''.--", • ' "- "Ili ,� ' !�.µr{{ + .� w .x.` _ �...._ `.. t , t. `t`. ..A •+i��(. .4'--1 -'' '`F`r�' ..-_i*, ' •Z,'J'• f.3� j .c i .' - + . .t .. .••I_}.•c' -..�- y`i� s✓,„, �.` -<_✓ate , ` • • ' E i" ar .� . F ` `•;� • Yy- w t'T•• ...? lit.‘4 � `\ - - - Ifls1i . s 2i_ ` • 44 -- 4e#6•" ..4.4-i• li -i tir• - - •---..-.- -- • . ....-. ' , a. . _ . `,. . -_ . - . 1.- i.--.? : 1 . • -•-.—: BASIN 1 REVISED - ;' • =- S' = s.‘::.y"lam-.-..••- ,��. - •-FL. art s ; _�s ,. • {EXHIBIT I-C. i •• 'r s+w S}• • t'' � .}".Y / a , •w_j' •Y-+ Cam•11 •- -f ��3 -� 0%-...:>-�.7: a.,,I .-,:. � �OFF-SITE HYDROLOGY`_ �� . ^ter - - •• _{ BUTTERFIELD_CROSSING '''' -s �L R t 1 -l //IiL/ . ' ( ci 4 i c s .I .- I COMM.BUILDING Q , • 5 A ; i; ; ; i .( , ASPHALT • 2582.44 4 i i r I. 1 COMM.BUILDING �j $a _ { — !r+ 1, CONCRETE CURB �' _ - • t JI i _ - — - _ . ALLEY --- -'"'1 f i r S 89'E8'21'V, . — .:- 1 . _' - - ' 39L58' - 1 i I N 39 58'Air Ai . ..... _ 2592.3 _ •I /' I i.,°( aim �, I L`�r I 7 r - • • o !; • + •., .Y th ofy— 1,.'; 8 cf ..., /, „,; : --zr 4 4•4• . . i- ,'. ( . , ...- = _ 3 Q S ' Z • N 89.58 it f- —:..__.-- ..� _ ��/ 0 i ' c :.. _. . \ �.G;trope.. BRE .KO , L• f 7 y ;Wa i• , . _ '► \ ) i RES. • ( ( �. __ - - • ••. 11 • " . I ex Pnox - • ._ J ' DOCKET 5995 PAD- r82 I i WASH CLASSIFIED XERORIPARIAN "C" ..mi... .v..100 YEAR FLOOD LIMITS EXHIBIT I—C.4(N) HYDROLOGY BUTTERFIELD CROSSING N Scale: 1" =100' A 1 Contour Intervals , DL E A • discharge of 1228 cfs, as shown on Exhibit I-C. 4 (N). South Parcels. North of Suffolk Drive, an upstream watershed with a drainage area of 76 acres has a corresponding 100 year peak discharge of 378 cfs. The same parcel is impacted from the north by a drainage area of 20 acres with a 100 year peak discharge of 161 cfs, and the two drainageways converge on the parcel approximately 400 feet south of the north boundary, as shown on Exhibit 1-C. 4 (S). 4. The following summarizes on-site hydrology. a. The Exhibits depict combined off-site and on-site generated runoffs and their floodplains with a discharge greater than or equal to 100 cfs. b. Sheet flooding does not appear to occur on any of the parcels. c. A review of FEMA's flood insurance rate map community panel #040073 1630C, map revised date: September 30, 1992, does not indicate the existence of any federally mapped 100 year floodplains or floodways on the parcels. d. As mentioned above, three off-site watersheds generate a discharge of 100 cfs or more. North Parcel. The off-site watershed produces a discharge of 1228 cfs from upstream, and combined on-site and off-site runoff leaves the site along its western boundary and is conveyed under Oracle Road via two 8' X 4' concrete box culverts. The culverts have capacity to accommodate only a 621 cfs discharge, and so, when the water surface elevation -6- r ,' (III. Gthlti.$uu.CIMG j ./ • {7---' coy;,.au tii '1 i \ �� err* (�` \ • liii' 4 S �i t ' i , f . „.. , . , 7,,____/,/ , 4.,,,,,,p10:,‘„,:,t,,.:4„,,,,„,,,/c, / ( ti .,„,\!) 11 — 1 f j ._, kg u/A', i ti, i „ ) , /// ' i l / 1 :44;.?; f , i / \ i---.......---' ..... till _____/s_ict./`_i).. , / -I 1 l' ' '-,-/ ,,r 1, / c \I \ 1 I r I ,lira• \s„.....r_i "I altifIty . L_....... -- _,•,N''' —-- '' \ tn./. ,:4:1'7,1 1.....,71 At T.,4;741,14:,7 12564A / .2542. ,,,,,,wr ,A,, 4 - 's--s ° - '\ 'it -/-1 -11/. 41 1 .....__. p -----Y ,---- ir I � . ‘ . I itipp."0, , „ „, 7 , - iii ., itraf � , ,„..., ..., , , t ,s tax .,� ` .n. �/1 ....., / II i 1 m I �/ ,fir ' LA,______- : ;X_ it 101437` cf .4r • ib, . a \ ,,/ ,,,,,,Atz, •-;.,. I, Ivw _.../ - - . ...:.•..,.. , . ,,,filf,,,,, .i.r •- \.__----- C • ' i N. ° . 1 ` :5 C ' 4 " „ :-;4,,-:e-:" �g 111141r, .a fir= -gip r;i= y ,;t .._- 4 ,1 � 4%74377t F' 1' f P 3A\ Ma d u _ r' 1 \ I •-..r am ° r y r,, .P', y 7, ♦ .,- \ Ii/ :ii ii-i 4 . / lit, if •••;',.: ,,,,e,#•-,40.4'.- ‘-' ',TOW,,,,,,,,;,.,.-_-_,---..<0....-:----) i / /ib'II. '', .4;C:i441014....1.1:',1 :0#S11'. 445.--) l i't :I A \1 / 'h i iv, emisict. 4---...,x,v,,,,,10: , 0 is il,il tattOrd'iO., ,,,,,„4,,e` \, \ \ '1' /ill d Re.s• 4 Q v0_ . �� � ►Q1�OT,19c s c--------- --- i 1J 0; / /\ 'i\ /•� I' 4'4, tole r e1 Sa7Urfi LINE OCK D , 1���. , /;/ t ` • !, '` / . - � --.._-_ -"'ter.,--.4 .i�i' . e \..�.,'-;' , SUFFO - OR. I r '-- `�(( i i y �7 Illaralli }( r Y(/mot+ - -. V. . 1 i� e If( 4, oa 5c s �/ I�` \� ¢ C!+l�f` --- '� ' �`"-- �`"�, t �r w �, ! \1 �f,.., '�-�!__ l �'' ( i4 iti I' f �1_43•` ^~•� -- -1 it r�� '�_'___/4 �i 1 r, \ \ 1 1 1 A..41 ....,1"'" "." a.---- \----------,',.. \,,4.'....--Y, t; N s: \, 7----- i: lit \ 1 z04 0,53,,, , /iii I,i0, lv„ ...., f ! 'I, �\ j \ r / i ,,, S ---------,-__i_ //if _____ :-/--.--:1• - --- .\5'. '---- 11(/ --.' - ems: .. r .% I .__._1�— amt aan --- —�,e#1 / I Ili( ___4.4.... I - .74— ►-`%`~ -- 1 `.‘ -- -•\ -- 'I --_. /^ ® ,�\ Mom,. i ".AD . :v •( �._ ` -.: :: i 1 ' \ ,,.2 \_�_ 1 r ^) - _.1...- -.:..4 *) \ I • \_,.. ------` ' ''' 4111 :f q ...— -' ''4'74. ' \,,\"../ 1 ,C,___..----'----.,____ f\,.'s N Scale: 1" = 100' EXHIBIT I—C.4(S) A CONTOUR INTERVAL 1 FOOT HYDROLOGY 71 100 YEAR FLOOD LIMITS BUTFERFIELD CROSSING reaches 2581.33 at Oracle Road, breakout will occur across Oracle Road and to the south in an existing drainage swale. South Parcels. The two off-site watersheds which converge on-site, north of Suffolk Drive and exit the site near its southwest corner with combined runoff of 552 cfs, conveyed under Oracle Road via a 7' X 6' concrete box culvert. Due to the limiting cross section of the structure, and assuming 10 feet per second velocity, there will be some headwater ponding in the ADOT right-of-way, in Suffolk Drive and on parts of the site for periods of short duration during the design event. Most of that water will flow to the south in a drainage swale along Oracle Road. 5. Currently, stormwater generated runoff leaves all the parcels in a westerly direction, with runoff continuing west where it intersects with Oracle Road and eventually drains into the Nanini Wash. I D. VEGETATION 1. a. The vegetative communities found on the site are typical of the lower Sonoran desert at elevations between 500 feet and 3,500 feet above sea level. The vegetative zones have been identified, in part by variations in the density of these trees. There are saguaros on the site, all of which are under 6' in height. Vegetation on the site is generally in good condition. Methodology for defining zones and plant density was direct: photography -7- and field inspection. Using 40 scale aerial photography, 3 vegetative zones were identified. These zones were expanded to 5 zones during subsequent field reconnaissance due to variations in plant diversity. The zones were identified as follows: Zone I — Natural drainage/wash — This area is comprised of a sandy channel with no vegetation and side slopes (approximately 1' — 3' in height) with thick vegetation 35 — 50 % coverage. This zone is located entirely within the southernmost parcel of the property. Species found within this zone include: Mesquite Prosopis sp. Catclaw Acacia Acacia constricta Palo Verde Cercidium microphyllum Optunia sp. Jumping Cholla Optunia sp. Prickly Pear Ambrosia Ambrosiodes Canyon Ragweed Zone II — Typical Desert Scrub Vegetation — This area comprises a large portion of the property and is generally level or gently sloping. The zone is predominantly triangle leaf bursage which covers 15 — 25% of the groundplane. Other species include: Palo Verde Cercidium microphyllum Creosote Larrea tridentata Triangle Leaf Bursage Ambrosia deltoidea Prickly Pear Optunia sp. Cholla Optuntia spp. Pin Cushion Cactus Mamallaria spp. Zone IIA— Typical Desert Scrub Vegetation — This zone is similar to Zone II with a higher coverage of triangle leaf bursage (25 —40%). -8- Zone Ill —Varied Desert Scrub Vegetation —This zone is similar to Zone II with additional species of plants as listed below. This zone also comprises a significant portion of the property. Coverage is 20 — 30%. Ocotillo Fouquiera spendens Fish hook Barrel Cactus Ferocactus spp. Saguaro Carnegiea gigantea Zone IV— Diversion Channel —At some point in the past, it appears that a small earth berm was constructed from northeast to southwest across the middle parcel of the property. This berm shows evidence of regrowth of native vegetation and small amounts of desert broom. Vegetative cover is low, generally less than 15%. Species found within this zone include: Palo Verde Cercidium microphyllum Creosote Larrea tridentata Triangle Leaf Bursage Ambrosia deltoidea Prickly Pear Optuntia sp. Cholla Optunia spp. Desert Broom Baccharis sarothroides Zone V— Mesquite — this area is characterized by the presence of numerous large mesquite trees. The shade from these trees reduces the understory cover to something less than 15%. Other plants found within the zone are similar to Zone II. Pima County's Xeroriparian habitat map for this area shows the wash abutting the northern parcel as Xeroriparian "C." After careful checking in the field, plus reference to aerial photos and topographic mapping, it is evident that the area is mis-mapped approximately 30 to 40 feet too far north. See Exhibit l-D.1.C(N) and the -9- I I 1 ft o r-� r� F 'I nu -,l rM-W,6, j°`. 1 iG ----' -alti ,, i•. _ �A $l,,,r• r.7�1! Ya R 4Y'� a �' 4t S t ( f "h _ .;., Y AYE' V r' h ,e,-.421.- At,: : - - ;. .- M �., i. ,,' a * i YC . .? S ! tII �Lk..li d R ('_�S4` .4.iY i r ..,`.. „1, ate.- ' , 0 i I` i ��. l ry .. � .lor-.. .. ..arLn}�a- i "n _.;.,�lE �. .�'�',� ,'. • '''---;:s: I,:''',::. •mit ff,,,,,, , , , 10,6, e,. t,ej, 'pAlifi, A,§111111 '• , , ,' . " , .. ;. . : . i ' i. a YQ• 41 k4 T it* .7. 6.tip..t '. ' w. Y- �y\ 4 ! 1. I Iit Y !L.f'4 !' y► A ,.l M 10, 'Y • YY Y • EXHIBIT I-D1 &2(N) Scale: 1" _ poor VEGETATION A DL&A BUTTERFIELD CROSSING ,*6 ' {• t.'",1..-p7-t:;:4-:';.-',. '1.- ' '.-.'- ''';:i' r ®7' ; At ,- S �, i[ ''i .'y n' . '` y a " ti fi ' f � � 3,� sr ' a 'a �r t y. a atS lz, p.,...•4... ,Ips:. ..,. . . . 8,,•,,,:i. .,44, ef:..14' ',,,,,-. :,,, ..,'.-- ,:1;- I f...i. • ' ' .'-- 7 7a .` ),, +:. + I �^ E'so er � , .l� 6 Y fi '�L �"1.. � � a�° T'A ,��•,�P -� C �` � i.� i 7kX,ti t �. y+ f tJ `+r: x Y-� et'''. , 'fie<'` sr j 8c ._`'�' • � -: IIA ri `: � A 1-. . :i�r S Ir e Zl'. ,;:'''::*A.;.-,:,..-:,,,,.,-,..., .., _,,:,,,,,:-„,, .-.....„-..,:.,- ., �;ta `Ia.:. f} s a,4'.� � r �'s v' 4. (F.'} i .1 �F , +yam 4,,.,.�B: ,,, - s`1l{ .. x ,:.. S r ,'::* --..: -,,', � ��.��4 .y�! -a. �����`. � t�' .a , 4�,1rI+ a �`�.+'��y>�,�� s,�•e�°�''`x s.li- �a �.C� �� ,,, 8. '",,,-..'''-:;..-..i'i . 'T.-:24ki' '''' ar .. ..i t.F`r',, '4 '4zr�! WW, w ...It F-'jr F� 3 t ` 3, 2 �'�`�,y7ci t" S.^'�� V.. � '-`.�ey p •s� t ,� '! ,._,� +�,,.gr ',: c �� .�'s:. _. all +n + �, 7 v�c � ,2 k �.a rt �+' ,S�' � e r ' �t�r r, �„�;!►wl°' � i •?`� � vv�, 8 �, �'r�E ',y� "'•`f ��'. r` S + J7�h'7h1,aw .' 1 1. y °`,' ':�..t t ' F < . „irott ,.:• . y- a. ! tiny`) :,�.^`,,'• . � �`` � b ` G >w �� �t,',•, � �� �III' 1� �* �� ,-` � i r .. } ',S r r '�.. t t'fir'* s + �, ..� _ �` .- 1.9 �r .'>7N• �o Y r %, j �'r. .,� r tY,�' u.t >� .i• ,r. .k � ,ti. e Nf M3�Y' F4 '• `e_" 1 r . i'i h� F y �Q1 Ig' 4 �. �*i"Y.cST.�t35 NI,-, '!< :; } r? C s z 1y ,4,r,�s .r A'rt I 4 am+_ � Yvi3,wu'.a' :E= ^P w.... r a ,�X .. g . ! .1 r ri �t t u��v•ra s.4"-t f- + s'' 1 Er -, ]'-' t �-, ? r.. h$ � -� 'ta,v •,',.' `xih. k-4.1 "} '�..;:-. t ra ± s ' .�. FI- 1 ,_, (a 1' s � e .'' s ' x4a Rv�r @''.' �+ •��,lguaro t'�a4ds �,` ..f tz x�`�'r1F-° • � r;' "M�`.1�� � }�K �`�'•f .., � r ky4a«. �*: ` w"A�P' .: •altlp a y+f }' ,P 6 4}xh I/ t yi {_., ,!y.:,,,k•� l S _. j. ` 9-- -. > ,L�....p •: i ` `:..�"�'z f1„'3 t �`...,- : ,Af?,,� -C y1 ilk F, ,i .7 '. - •s'{� I�sal -A, '' Y n .' ' t. XY � 'N�'1K �$ � b 4P7 < Ys a♦ � r N ,.�i%rki � i,y ,-y. dig• r,r .,..-,, r �Vi t �i;,,�t 'k v ER a k 1r :;:t ri. � C• • t. i ',..�� � + .y. - v,4„ '„,,,„,-: 4,4i'‘1,-,. .., :-;,„:4,, „:;e: ,� * . � p� Ak ` III ; T a A.111.01- '. t +< ,q •i R+.yx, �t�,. ' ' ,----,-, • try( -.'''':;*. ..)1.-:, ' �� � 4 •• - �� ` ` ram ` ,-. ' 5 ._y 4k t —AI, i S 4yaW` `y am r 7 tilt (_. s}^; �4'�.. :} �k^'t���� �� : �E r"�}f u't::t`+8 ct''s�l� � 7'4} ,'"t �� F� 1 ����kt • �'�SI i.._� f''''';',i'6':%-r--••• .,t 'M '. I F �.• 11 _tom N A `'r l '. A• t a,tt;M�y� '• •� _ � y+t 9a..i+c' '� ,� �.:. 1 ��O .,`s,.. ts,:',4,61,-,r..-:,,?7,,.:.,: ;',!,.4:e:::4.,4,,, 1 � ... ��.d �� Y � a ?fit• .s s ,.?,--b ^'R • � is y. 4 5 r�4' N �. E iit y) y� r A'•'- R s': .i�. �-Xt.it9l`,ai::3'.' . ... , .. �"±' .i•�.. • N EXHIBIT ID. 1 &2 (S) Scale:. .,i, , . 1 — 100 A VEGETATION D��A BUTTERFIELD CROSSING PIMA COUNTY PARCEL QUERY SYSTEM aillIllIll a Wash Network No CFS Value A/100-500 CFS A/500-1000 CFS 'A*/1000-2000 CFS �. 2000-10000 CFS Al 10000-25000 CFS _ � � Greater than 25000 CFS Regional Parcels Riparian and Hydromeso Habitats __.� , Xeroriparian A N` Xeroriparian B �_,--'-- ®Xeroriparian C -- ( ;;wI Xeroriparian D "' Ir liti Hydro-Meso • Flood Plains-FEMA W I l Flood Plain ( l Out by LOMR C mill mX 11111111111110* m X. "T, XI- ,„">t 1"= 200.00 feet m x 03 Note: there are important discrepancies between the PCFCD / x Y r delineation of habitat area shown on this map and actual condi- ( / ❑ -•� tions observed in the field and related to the boundary and topography survey of the property. The final determination of the ti->-�°' actual Xeroriparian "C" limits will be by field survey and inventory I X X v at the time a development plan is being prepared, and appropriate Q "... . mitigation methods will be \`"--11' Cn 1,1% >a:7110 F ^ e% OZ Plot dale:Nov 18,1998, C\pclis\gisquer3 apr i ( \ \4\ 1.. —T i . . 1, 1 !:: ! : \\,----"--- \ ) 44 -7 r '.. . L - Fr, - ...-c-, i, \ , . , tt.i :.t --I, . fit ,t1 t ; ‘ z......,,„„k t 1 \ -. 1 . . II f 4 i 1 ':•.- 1 i \A\ :101' ‘ rtU' 'I I - t L i{N i ' r. '�.: t '-,r. '' l' Lr ' ,......___I__! i '.. k. 1 : .- --- - , {// • if ' I _ i / i" / mc: ,! , �n L} °' ` $ W ,G -----.....4,j, % ,- - -7-cT., 1 .7/_,,,, .,/ ,..../A. i : — . „.....- \ . .. _ -ti.... ,; ' -.•....,,:,,!---i ,7-:..ice,3^+.1-14{'-"'-.--••-�-` •.. • This is a map of the current and revised limits of the Xeroriparian "C" wash immediately east of Oracle Road in Section 36, T12S, R13E. The re- visions are confirmed by current topographic mapping and aerial photo- graphy. /1_7____ Pima Count Flood Co rol District dat ) XERORIPARIAN REVISEE accompanying revision. b. No endangered or threatened species were encountered during the course of vegetation inventory. One large saguaro in poor condition was found within the southernmost parcel. This has been shown on the vegetation map. c. Existing vegetation along the Oracle Road frontage and adjacent to the alley has special value for screening and scenic quality. No other significant or exceptional vegetative associations are found within the property. Vegetation adjacent to Suffolk Dr. should, to the extent possible, remain in place for screening from the residential roadway. During the design process, the site should be evaluated per the criteria of the vegetation preservation and salvage criteria established by Pima County. 2. Plant cover density and methodology is described above. I E. WILDLIFE 1. The Arizona Game and Fish Department has issued a letter with an attachment designating special status species based upon review of records in the Department's heritage data management system. The letter and attachment are presented as Exhibit I E. 1. a-d. Site visitation by a plant and habitat specialist did not indicate the presence of -10- Ia ne,ItHul !II! OF ARIZONA •. • ('Itnirutan.Nero(.ucnlher,I aura i.i.uu Itr:t• n GAME & FISH DEPARTMENT k1, 2221 West Greenwav Ilia(:.Phoenix.Arinula 85O23-439t) U o2I`4-12 tOU(! \\\t a Lt.state a/.u. Tucson Office,555 N.Greasewood Rd.,Tucson,AZ 85745 { July 30, 1998 Mr: Don Laidlaw I)on Laidlaw and Associates 1735 E. Ft. Lowell, Ste. 10 *I ucson, Arizona 85719 Re: 3 Parcels(2,4.5,& 1.5 acres)Near Suffolk Drive&Oracle;T12S, R13E, Section 36. Dear Mr. Laidlaw: Due to excessive workloads and limited personnel availability, the Arizona Game & Fish Department (Department) is, at this time, only able to provide you with the list of special status species that are known to occur in the vicinity of the above-referenced parcel(Attachment A). This list is based on the review of records in the Department's Heritage Data Management System' (1-1DMS). For information.that will assist you in identifying the on-site native vegetation communities and their values as wildlife habitat, the Department recommends the following references: • Brown, D.E. (ed). 1994. Biotic Communities - Southwestern United States and Northwestern Mexico. University of Utah Press. 342 pp. • Shaw W.W., L.K. Harris, M. Livingston, J.P. Charpentier,and C.'. Wissler. 1996. Pima County Habitat Inventory-Phase II. Arizona Game&Fish Dept.Contract No.650028-001. Phoenix, AZ. 94pp. (Vegetation information available through Pima County.) • Pima C'ounty's 1986 Map of Critical and Sensitive Wildlife Habitats. The thilowing measures that relate to Federal/State regulatory compliance should be applied when appropriate. 'Those practices that pertain to landscape design and site planning arc practices beneficial in maintaining habitat elements compatible with native desert wildlife. Implementation ' Information contained in the Department's HDMS is dynamic and updated on a periodic basis. Any information. therefore. is likely to•become outdated shortly after its release. Such information is intended to serve as a :wide re`,arding what species may be found in a particular area. It does not represent the results of comprehensive species- 'pecitic surveys. EXHIBIT I-El (1 WILDLIF DL&A BUTTERFIELD CROSSING Mr. Laidlaw July 30, 1998 of these landscape design/site planning practices will not totally mitigate for the loss of native desert habitats,however,evidence shows that incorporation of these practices will foster the retention of those native wildlife species which can exist in urban/suburban environments. The Department recommends these landscape/site planning practices be implemented as conditions to the proposed re-zoning. Federal/State Regulatory Compliance: • Apply the attached guidance from the USFWS regarding the Endangered cactus ferruginous pygmy-owl and contact them.as appropriate. • If plants protected under the Arizona Native Plant Law are likely to occur on the subject parcel,contact the Arizona Department of Agriculture for additional information regarding potential restrictions which may apply to the salvage or removal of plant species. A suggested contact is: Mr.James McGinnis Manager,Native Plant Law Plant Services Division Arizona Dept.of Agriculture 1688 W.Adams Phoenix,Arizona 85007 602;542-3292 • Adhere to the attached tortoise handling guidelines for development projects if Sonoran desert tortoise are likely to occur on the subject parcel. • Contact the Departments Tucson Regional Office immediately for direction regarding the disposition of an active bat roost sitc(s) if one is found on the property. • During pre-construction and construction activities, contact the Department's Tucson Regional Office immediately for direction regarding the disposition of an active raptor nest(s) if one is found on the property. Landscape Design/Site Planning: • Maximize the amount of interconnected open space within the development. • Utilize native plant species for all on-site vegetation and revegetation. • EXHIBIT I-E. 1 (2 WILDLIFE BUTTERFIELD CROSSING DL&A Mr. Laidlaw July 30. 1998 l 1 • Employ revegetation schemes that re-establish and maintain vertical diversity (ground cover, shrub layer,and canopy cover)with native plant species. • Retain in place or salvage mature woody vegetation including saguaros and ironwoods (mature adults as well as immatures). • Maintain the vegetative and hydrologic integrity of all washes,especially those which Pima County's 1986 Map of Critical and Sensitive Wildlife Habitats identities as Class 1 or II Riparian Habitats. Please call me at 520/628-5982 Ext. 137 if you have questions. Sincerely. Sherry A. uth r I labitat Speci• st SAR:sr cc: John Kennedy, Project Evaluation Program Supervisor, 1-labitat Branch, 1'1IX Bob Fink, District Wildlife Manager, Region V Supervisor, USFWS, Az Ecological Services State Oft, PHX James McGinnis. AZ Dept. of Ag, Plant Services Div._ PHX Attachments PRCJECTS\COUNTIES\PIMA\SA\-i•""SUFFLK.DLA EXHIBIT I-E. 1 (3 WILDLEF BUTTERFIELD CROSSING DL&A r Mr. Laidlaw July 30,,1998 4 ATTACHMENT A SPECIAL STATUS SPECIES 3 PARCELS NEAR SUFFOLK DR. & ORACLE COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME STATUS cactus ferruginous pygmy-owl Glaucidium brasilianum cactorum LE,WC,S California leaf-nosed bat Macrotus californicus WC,S Pima indian mallow Abutilon parishii S,SR Tumamoc globeberry Tumamoca macdougalii S,SR STATUS DEFINITIONS LE - Listed Endangered. Species identified by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) as being in imminent jeopardy of extinction. WC - Wildlife of Special Concern in Arizona. Species whose occurrence in Arizona is or may be in jeopardy, or with known or perceived threats or population declines, as described by the Department's listing of Wildlife of Special Concern in Arizona (WSCA, in prep. October 1996 draft). Species designated as WC previously appeared on the list of Threatened Native Wildlife in Arizona (TNW 1988) and are retained on the most recent WSCA. S - Sensitive. Species classified as "sensitive" by the Regional Forester when occurring on lands managed by the U.S.D.A. Forest Service. SR- Salvage Restricted. Those Arizona native plants not included in the Highly Safeguarded Category,but that have a high potential for theft or vandalism, as described by the Arizona Native Plant Law(1993). any State or Federally listed threatened or endangered species, nor an unusually high diversity of species. Much of the north parcel exhibits a high density population of mesquite trees. The Game and Fish Department letter recommends maximizing interconnected open space, utilizing native plant species, revegetation with native plants where possible, preserving mature woody vegetation in place and conservation of washes. No significant habitat or areas of concern have been noted, although it is possible that special status species such as the cactus ferriginous pygmy owl, the California long-nosed bat, the Pima Indian mallow or the Tumamoc globeberry might unexpectedly arrive at the site. I F. SOILS 1. Soil testing has not been done on any of the parcels. 2. As sewer service is available to all parcels, no individual septic systems are proposed. I G. VIEWSHEDS 1. The views described below were analyzed by field trip, photos and placement of a 24 foot pole with target in possible building locations in order to gauge visibility from off-site viewpoints. Exhibit I-G.1 b is an area map showing views through the sites from surrounding areas and Oracle Road, a scenic route. North Parcel. Views from adjacent rights-of-way or residential properties across -11- a z3 4AGEE 35 -s 1 r)1•101, 4 LI "" A •a � R CBI I. af dill r 1 te " ..* i * ;*I"' ....1 CB -1 ._ . 2 ® ilift qr *I I .r• • •.• rci �... •� rM V• ROM 44,c4 • i i �, • IN, ; :- f ammo \Nor tit ai .....,... - - -CB 1 — 4 II ilitd. IWO 0 a 0,41)1 0.1V iii.SR • I TR • A ,3 ,s 1110 TR >ry 4 < <._• : • • s• 1• ,t 1e SUNSET VIEWS , VIEWS TO LAApTè. . c� . " ` lb , \ \ \ \-. 6 i Z /4 UCO �« scwro • • 1441) .\V • k N. .$0126.\ , • I 744 is ,O ti 74A.141is .. ewe1 4 • •• , CR- 1 e . Is Lieffill • -r al •K N Scale: 1" = 400' EXHIBIT IG.1 .L A DL&A VIEWS THROUGH SITE BUTTERFIELD CROSSINC the north parcel are effectively blocked by existing vegetation. Residences closest to this parcel are generally south of the south property line extended, so that current residents' sunset views to the west are unobstructed. Likewise, views onto the property from Oracle Road, a scenic route, are blocked along the frontage by dense screening vegetation. Views over the vegetation to the mountains beyond would not likely be blocked by development carried out in accordance with scenic route standards. South Parcels. These properties are much more visible, from east to west, to nearby residences of Suffolk Hills if they are out walking on their property. However, existing mature vegetation in the vicinity of the residences and rear patios tends to limit visibility from the residences themselves.. Again, sunset views are of primary concern, and future development of the parcels will alter short and medium range vistas due to installation of landscaped bufferyards. North of Suffolk Drive, the Oracle Road scenic route frontage is well-vegetated with trees which screen views of the site from the highway, while south of Suffolk Drive there is less vegetation and the site is more readily visible. Development of this site will affect views toward the Catalina Mountains for a brief moment as motorists flash by. 2. Exhibits 1-G (N) and (S) depict the sites' existing tree screens and degree of visibility. Where tree screens fully block views, visibility is rated low. Where there is intermittent vegetation or separation between the viewer and the site by a -12- r ii j {t fj g p i I� pt�f 11/111lig i 11 f1 F t t 4! 1 ( f�Isi it �� i i r. t f� c�:�s;.c�nisx:sa;; >, ,' , 1 DIRECT,_VIEW_ _, y" _{ < s .�} 3';i,,.L41 1 ?i i I a C'7�'v+t Z'aEa iP 1 dr+ ....,.„,; r � �``EY'".�u'$Sc'81.i ��.\J tJ 1 j cY 13 it/ /il, 1 ,• °'.i"h %.y w aF. "._T' i' rx ,....* ^4•4: d' " i,r. .... v.., sry - 1 s O i,fi, �' � 4 s ✓/ . E ; r . , . :.„ ?,Jai f? , - ...... riit�i F n � 4 ,�, , z cj1g, g �y t,�7, I/F ` \ 3 }t i '��,: v J _.. f a"1 i� E f 'F M rfAK f1 '�l f. y S \\ ...«.... jj , �'�'' < M.. if i �� F \ L f• I Iti i r� v F �., i;' \� ' TREE SCREE1\10 I. `. i F ,..,,, i , i t, i / git, ..,/04,,. .o.'-$0- 1 , \ .4 : ' 4" s' ' -',.--414 \'.--— ,,,,,- ,-:."- ,,,,,.„,01,-, ''..i;Tx,''' . '', \\........." { \ \ k*'AI,f'' ,•., .''''';- '• ,' '4' 'Cr' ' .7' ,(x. , 1 6.7 1 - qw,,,,,?::;:i.viikA , \ 1 • _....:I, ,,,..4:„.,,,, ,,,,, s„.. 1....;,,,, _., I , . -„, ,...„. „....,,,f, ,..e). , ,.., , . , c...t, 1 4 / :::,,,L.,,,,,,:,: ,,,,,,,,,,- , , ;...,.. .. F ` � zro, „y, `t v 3'sa'�' t 1 •-• ,:41 .--,',i,.:—:„,,,,,,,,i,„ 1 ; \ 446 , / 1 ,s„.,,. "\�f .,,Aa�..h'3: :^f y.1., "x'x.R.,,,,,' f"n1) ' ,r Ei .ay„. w''�,y.,�' P_tt345.4—•M f i 14 sir "rye x.0_• ; Ate' ,.� m # '�` .b C-if, / b& 'a 3 " 4 '' Ni, \. "'e�/J y°4%F ,aP 4�wMe f4'�'• „../•%,� ,,,... � .. ,„' j..... fi 3 ,, '.• ". '''' ,* y" „� t ;w.. -,zi.-. My,....-,. •,.ate' t :.� 'f-,._.�"`•307 ('�j t t i ,,,• j--„...., ,2- r' .t�. _;,,, 3..e ....:s..�,,.'.....;�V.'•r`5-'5 :1„f f '7 W7,,,,i, , (J 54.4 ii "'� ,IV I/ T '-.l ``.v. �9 m''°,.�'�P--- .. �-----i` J�!' s.1x"x fJ/ �'t � �\ �w•. ."...,mot ,,-Tr.,„ / 4 • fJ di I, " r l t !f I f! �i / i t 'fit ,i /4.afj, ''��'..�{hyr ,.1 !tw 1C>: .` �r�f tJJ}f ( € ..�..i ... ! ^ .... ...Y t �� t'E !'..� ''+s / !! irk f' arF i ' ` f �... 1 4j / ...'.. •ti.___.. y `LOW VISIBILITY f` -- ) `t i i ! ' VQ I i i NO VIEWS OR VISTAS ACROSS SITE FROM, OR FROM BEYOND, ADJACENT PROPERTIES Scale: 1" = 100' N A CONTOUR INTERVAL 1 FOOT DL&&A EXHIBIT I —G 1 &2 (N) VIEWSHEDS NORTH BUTTERFIELD CROSSING /Ii._ i:1iIi1dkr . q�z5. ♦t�I� W Z 8.1 � z.s.... i e., illitio,:,,,,,,,,,47 , �5tli is ,,, IR to:. 1 i I g . It, - I Iltr • g I~ N IS88 J t' \ J. ' ° elk cr d 1►, . o -*- , „-„ 0, Wa, , w' ��1nVi* � r 2564.4 Iu/i"!• c� W ,Erz:). i (5? I, 0 !kwcc . P IT O E E N. S �i fa . �. • - -,IF 'Es i Ir ill 4.4411:)0NIIiiftmesomilellkill -----? ; o • V 14: 1010111 erg i„,...7(.. . 2562 r 2563' ikikaJ, Aghwavo.11061* .5 /1 " :. .000,00, .,/I FJ 5. .3 Jr:� I , :1 tiralVell _.,/ lax_ ciJ F % i1'�— 1 -ART � .— — I/ i ( Pti ..7; - —r . I -/ *e.4 02 TO-.0M N 1 > iAktl)/ /vP T P Iowa a Y o ' O < SOUTH LINr,r;A;:,.,i:d:i se.::i,d.ri iPi-,,":o-,rg.,i., OCtt 8. n . OA(, is Zs i,s"s 297-V :9 ♦8'16'V Ai ' li.i i to LOW LOW -..• •'"a''%�� .� • � r�r: ..P�ffa ' ��'SUFFr;. !R. _ ,MEDIUM gooi.g..I o r 25�.9 1 so,ternir .-.. ....4onrste-`-irwaii` --tio . '1 4 4C /� triltfillaliir11111171 256♦-7 N - 19Yin {{fffL!..-��� .nu. o1 Ad W J ` � > >1 ,:t2 i �sw > 5. 1 :.4 _ ��5 z `c i / it- L� " 1111-117HIG/.1 44:01M W Milli 4 N Scale: 1" = 100' EXHIBIT I—G 18c2 (S) CONTOUR INTERVAL 1 FOOT DL&A VIEWSHEDS BUTTERFIELD CROSSING substantial distance, visibility is rated medium. Where there are open, close by views to the site, even of brief duration if traveling on Oracle Road, visibility is rated high. I H. TRAFFIC 1. Exhibit I H.I.J.K. shows all abutting streets onto which the site will have access. Major routes serving the site are Oracle Road, Magee Road and Ina Road. Oracle Road is also a scenic route. Access to the north parcel will be directly from Oracle, and another Oracle access point is likely to be located 350 to 400 feet north of Suffolk Drive. Access to the other south parcel will be via Suffolk Drive. The following table presents further information: STREET R-O-W LANES CAPACITY SPEED ADT ORACLE 200 6 52,000 50 36,600 INA 150 4 35,000 45 38,000 MAGEE WEST 150 3 18,000 45 17,186 MAGEE EAST 150 2 12,000 45 2,573 SUFFOLK 60 2 2,500 25 435 I I. SEWERS 1. Exhibit I I. 1. is a copy of the capacity response letter from Pima County Department of Wastewater Management. 2. Exhibit I H. I. J. K. shows the location of existing public sewers at the eastern -13- . - ..„„irc..._,................ .1..7 .. ,) . -1111!---.1 n•,, 71:EF.'- i I...74.!II 771 '' jr--- ____t ,., 4 ! .. . "7.1 . r • r•i kg• i..1 . . , , .....1., • ' 10 1 l .ii, ! i 1 •1 i '• .ol'a ' * ' L' . j____ • 4.i1 ""I' • ±DT' -e-,4.-----. .s. 1111111M=1111111 AMMENsis MIS MA EE • •. • ..,---a, ------r-7---1 ! ,„ '` - gill 7186 AD; . r 7-7- - H- cRi-i [ T \ •-••••••••••••••••- . . 1 L._ . •... g. , ,• SR I CB -1t • ...- •---..--i i , • - .:134-0 SR • -- ---4 r .r li ,,, ).1---111 . 1 1,, i . -e7 -I CB-1 4 ..---- - %_„7 , ...• _...- ---1-1-- .•, ..... . , ___ , ., ---„, . CR-5 c' ____c.)i -c - ,-;--1_ V - r 1,-----'--7 4..--t-4;---7-1,„ir.i. .•'.-/..Ct'rt . . , ...' ------ 8 a , 71.I x-0 • . . , • "" •-....*4 ,_.--•-• --;__,. . a' \ • --• . , - P4 .,-•;;...1,4111- i. ,i, I 1;11 ' ..,, ..1 •/ • I 1 ,.__-__.1‘ ---. . •;2 refiLlf-t .; • , ..-f-fret i • `-' V .- '- 0 • •• , , ,,,4prn 1 ••• : . p4 1 -1 , .-•-t ---1-71.--Z--___L_Lsma --- " • 0! ' C B-I ! Mliff, / ....__ . : • --i--.__ • - ----z 1 / , :,,..i7_ ,.\`'.„-- -..---,--. I ...- .,. , , .„, • --- . . • ------- 1_ - ---!,)-- ,_. , if i --, ,.' . . . • 1•• _....,• ....•-.‘ '.. • • .-• AI, 1.......... --1 • 1 g4orr T 41 •• !1'it 1 ..:•••..-.•. -.1 1.22-‘i.. 1..- --'-"•-----•-• f----- - i▪ . ! _ J T Ft • CV".1 \,$$ ',C -___ .- ' • - --. r --*"i 1S41. i___,__\*. , k c•-• _ , ,,I• . •• . . • I (Cf li i i I ar ; .. .r • .',:::::*,.:•.1. vx-,. ;1 '. \ \ i .... _ -...,--1 • „2-t,1171r.rv..,_,-... , , ; . . , . , 0 ,:::,-,.:!,;.,',',..,,.S.:::';'•'.:',.:? ..: ' \ ‘, I ti-":, --1-' •,, _.›-,.., 1•. 1_ . . qfi_I . P.,... .-3.A.,,,,,'?„-,,-. : ‘.., ••••.* tt-..••••42.f* 'i!.-.. TR 'sr .,:?..k,.•.:, •:',.. .: . .,. , )...1 , - . \ J I '''''',..%'-r. ! ..• -1; 1 • 1 • ; • 'I% .I • AZ) ''''''7...,'3'40,',', ..; i ; ",1•••-• '---Phit.--' .1 ",;..,--.-'-:•C-.1'1..A S.• ..t:-.2L-• ..'''-70...' i 1 . • - r - C) ji.p.,„:.: ,,,?, ...„.. - : , I. , 1.. \i•-14...w ..)". ,ir rcs ' co ino,., 1._ • • i i ---- , - • 1 , i . . .__i .i. . ) ' _2! .'CFP • -,-.-. _ 7-Trs ' • 4' _.,. .., .,...- i . t db.• :"'" _al 7.- .• -"%.7....." i • ,i' ist.4.: 77,""". .... -,-, • 1 L--I1- . . ..___ , ,., i . • . . ..• • / - -- I - ,,, '. V- 1 ', . . .. -• V., 6 CA-1 ' .... --',:). .,.• . . -1-. ..• . -- ... ,_.._ _ 4e, •. ••• .1-11' ,-/ .11,-1 I •,6,_ - t: •lA .,1 i'/ ..k.- 1 ; 41., • •V . g • 1 , .,‘ '• s • /. g „ . - . .a......,- . 1,, : 1 ..A..'1••. •• ' f\ ..r'j,...- , /N ''. //••• Ill ' 4.. 44. i 11 -.S'-'- ' • 1:-:'I - ; ••'•- > ••••• 1=Z. _ 1 . c" i t• I . ft: i‘ i'.•'L \ , / ., ' ; ;' 7 A---:;1: . 7 -- ./ /$ 11$.. •, - •-• '_,, .. 0., . , s of i . i • • , ' '1.ItT 2 • • -- .' -- : - -__ __ CR-"I . 'II. •'.‘- i..I '' , / '''' '7---1 1 CB-1 ' .,-- ... ---- - ' -- i LI ' ,....--- .-., ••. _ i _ .., 1",ti .. i If 1•••......--.-...1..111, .......4••••,.. .1, • i ,.••• f tr-Z1 L______ . "•,..... •'• i so ' ...C. .' •e ) '' . •• el‘"i o' I ;--1'4 )i. ••-11'.----' ".1 -.., I ; ' • -"'-` ! - ---'-'' ' ''' . .... r•I; 1r( ' ;-' • 1 ". l ;.-.. •. i "' $ ... i,,, 4,..•i • , , - $ l ,---- . " .'' • _ ••I I • _____ i ; ' I i .1-7---*---.. ----1--' : .ki 01 •ti, LII:r I • Art• 1 ..'.11--- .ill .•" 61 j •t ..1, i tj 1(..., _ ..., , , ! .. • ,...,, .. , . . fie., i - ' - . -- ' ---- T----f ..-- 4----- - ---5-.,..._ •- , ..... ,: ... yr- , ''''' • 4 ' / • 1 I ---. . ' •\ , t w , , - , *, 1. .1 - --- .----7-±"----d-- -'..-- - -38-000--A 6 .'--17:- 1 I "11111"." e' 1_{...__I___...... , ---..... -.......---.a.._ r-----, -_,---- .-- EIMMIK/MM. INEMMOM MIIIIIIIIIIIIIIR /160.11.11 • . -dar s.4 71:7. - INA -----, r-- I 4•_ L ad. ____:, rid, , -i• ii•-• , ....,---W-VI ---- -- ,.._- .. .,d r , .., dd., ; .. f I ...X-i.. ti .* , ' 1 i c' I- ....., ' ... • 1 ' 11-r----i 1- -..-fiR ---T----1 - - ,..- "- _ 4-'1' . ••;; '7.----- • .7 .1 ' r-• ..22 I ... ' . . I : i no• i _ : • •; --------;_•_..... ..,.. ,--tr .d -.. s... . ...., • .... I. .... ; ii. •• ! '•••• 1 ' , ..- _. • i I 1--- 8 1 • ,... . •,,- - .....• -7,--- , I 4-11 I -,!: , w EXHIBIT I -H, I , J, K TRAFFIC, SEWERS, TRAILS N Scale: 1" 1-•-- 800' A DL&A BUTTERFIELD CROSSING (:,,, :';i: ' eiC*/ PILAU COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 201 NORTH STONE AVENUE TUCSON,ARIZONA 85701-1207 GEORGE A.BRINSKO May 22, 1998 PR:(`.s20)74Q-8$t?6 Director FAX:(520)820-0135 Donald H. Laidlaw, MCP Don Laidlaw it Associates 1735 East Fort Lowell, Suite 10 Tucson, Arizona 85719 Re: CAPACITY RESPONSE NO. 98-39 pear Fir. Laidlaw: We have reviewed your request of May 12, 1998 regarding the availability of sewer service for the following proposed use and property: 60,000 square feet of office space along the east side of Oracle Road south of Magee Road. Under existing conditions (actual developments and commitments for service through approved Sewer Service Agreements), there is capacity for this proposed development in the downstream sewerage system and in the existing 8- inch diameter sewer located adjacent to the parcels in the roads and alleys. This response is not to be construed as a commitment for conveyance capacity allocation, but rather an analysis of the existing sewerage systlam as of this date. Should you desire to enter into a Sewer Service Agreement, a Development Plan or Tentative Plat, showing the preliminary sewer layout for the proposed project, must be submitted and approved. To qualify as a public conveyance system, flow must be by gravity to an existing public sewer system. Public sewers may also be required if Wastewater Management determines that there is a flow-through requirement in order to serve upstream parcels. Should you desire additional information regarding this subject, please contact this office (520) 740-6547 or by FAX at (520) 620-0135. Very truly yours, enn . C i, . Civil Engineer copy: Jerry Stratton Steve Magelli Capacity Response File/121336 DL&rA . EXHIBIT 1 -1. 1 SEWER CAPACITY BUTTERFIELD CROSSING ..,_ ,I, ..... ______ . _ .._{....._____ �-s ♦ iO3S ii._.... Ir r—�--rv-4o—es `2° ioo �z 1 slue• 4. ., I ` 2 5 r Ogam„st s-444-20.>,., �. M.,-..c)0 �IAGEE R o1 1, i 3 36 i l 7174 •stirs' 7957 I 7ss0 0 / 7119t 7152 •Mts-si • 551 p.e•t4 • a 7051 7sSt .tu•e. • a to n 17 O 1 •• a.t-1t 54 in -125 I n 7550 = b • IIOMtECEt t 0 r - I IMlla -IlJ Etx v, 7a,+o g y Z W , 7151 f 0—S55 •tuts-s4 a _ - ! list nit I •►s,s-or 1111:a U 7!►� W IY N f.lY••. M-SSS I •-ItT \awlso 71815 Lai IL O 0 1 74/ e, /f ,i/ y of/•M • • 7127 7•93 AAZ H 1 7j ^ i'sow.1 7515 GNE`S I s 1 '� __....ggik4 , .L.L.,,___ i , z qv ..,, I. LI 7750 1yL�� re aa-a I'. 1166 Ts9 • : O mo //i' 1 ....r•s l i 1 r iisb -„,, . , . ZORACLE VILLAGE (r•su ••f 31/64) � f/ w .-r• ,,-r'► i Li MP 490 tc ,S �, 1110 1 7734 MU-s. 0 :i7740 •;0207 et ...to. N1 • ICY O 1/ �1, v J 77so w 7720 •. -so 7720 S-12S �p1 r. 2 ,o‘b .-I? •.a 7c WI-III • i M 9 Y2 t17 • 703, — _-._ - 7 S 0141 N15 j ;\ 7701 ---, l'''.. ','':-,'.'' '-'"'''';';'11''''''::'!gleg . • • ji " • 111 S f I f % ..tt O Y s 7553v•r N /' ,/ t;Ye •I - to S-125 tg t' s.>.. ail& s S../q t 7 I s 'f - s� S • '�� SUFFOLK D IVE Y f- i • • •y.t •...s•.4�. f� • i ,.. / 11� I to.✓/<FG/i x j. . A O I •...... 4$..ro2 t ,, h t,cf '',,--;'',,,,',.•f .ch 1 r . g H / k '' l s r I 7t02 ins.. - .Ae�►1'ro. _7M1-M -4 f iaA#/,f rt'Yr '«w;3^' f i 1 _ A sc ale:1"=400' EXHIBIT 1-1.2 SEWERS BUTTERFIELD CROSSING boundary of the parcels. 1 J. SCHOOLS As the proposed use is non-residential (office) this section is not applicable. I K. RECREATION AND TRAILS 1. The Exhibit shows no parks, recreation areas or adopted public trails within one mile of the site. 2. No trails rights-of-way are designated. I L. CULTURAL RESOURCES: ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORIC SITES 1. The property was surveyed in May, 1998 and no resources were found, as indicated in Exhibit I L. 1. (a, b, c). 1 M. AIR QUALITY Not applicable to this Site Analysis. 1 N. COMPOSITE MAP The composite maps, Exhibits I N (N) and (S) show the various combinations of three features: floodplain, vegetation and visibility. -14- PAST PROCESSIONAL ARCIIAi OLOG1cAL SERVICES Alin TLCNNQLOGIES June 1, 1998 Mr.Don Laidlaw Don Laidlaw&Associates 1735 E.Fort Lowell#110 Tucson,AZ 85719 RE: Report for Wong Properties Archaeological Survey PAST Job No.980884 Legal: Portion N2 Sec. 36-T12S R13E G&SRB&M Dear Mr.Laidlaw Personnel from P.A.S.T.conducted a 1 personday,approximately 8 acre survey of the Wong Properties property on May 18, 1998 located in Pima County near Tucson in anticipation of land development. The field work consisted of an intensive on-foot coverage of the property by our staff in order to identify and locate any cultural resources, historic or prehistoric,within the property boundaries. Field personnel(D.Stephen)were spaced approximately 20 meters apart and crossed the subject property in a series of contiguous corridors with any areas of extreme slope covered less intensively. General conditions were excellent for conducting the fieldwork. Ground visibility was moderately to severely effected by the presence of trees,shrubs,semi-shrubs,succulents and grasses. The original land-form was moderately disturbed by historic alterations to the ground surface. No isolated artifacts were observed nor were there surface indications of archaeological resources on the property which meet the minimum standard for recording as an archaeological site or that would be eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. Archives at the Arizona State Museum showed there are no recorded sites on the subject property. Based on the field methods employed and the observable surface indications,there does not appear to be sufficient evidence to warrant further archaeological studies on the property. Although I do not endorse additional archaeological studies for this project,ground disturbing activities on the property should not commence without authorization by the agency archaeologist(s) and the State Historic Preservation Office, as appropriate. The likelihood of buried materials being present is low. There remains the possibility that ground disturbing activities could reveal the presence of heretofore undiscovered archaeological resources. If such materials are discovered construction activities should stop. Consultation should be initiated with the cognizant agency archaeologist,and if applicable under ARS 41-841 et seq. the Arizona State Museum, to assess the potential significance of any artifacts or features unearthed. Under State law (ARS 41-865 & ARS-41-844) if human skeletal remains or funerary objects are discovered on either public or private lands the Arizona State Museum should be contacted immediately. Thank you for the opportunity to work with you on this project. If I may be of any further assistance please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, David V.M.Stephen Archaeologist State Antiquities Permit No. 98-52BL DL&A EXHIBIT 1 -L. 1 CULTURAL RESOURCES BUTTERFIELD CROSSING '.- I COMM-BUILDING '25 2.0• i 'i i:: i I ( ASPHALT • C BUILDING ' iN Il, - CONCRETE i COWL �� .. 1 ------ -._:-_ _ -- ALLEY~ ' ill i NORTH L LOCK 8 S 89758'21'11 . ,i _ ,s, • i sr m •• .,, ..... - • `� 1 2592.3 1,118•11 WD ; :x + • _ ,1 m ,- - a .. !, _ _-_ BB �I�\" FP it '.I F, j CSC.BOx , •x 25 6 `\ 80. r. • , i 4 •„, 88a `..i ,,�' 4 c 2592.5 �Y O SLOPES•OVER 15./0- 1 i .. . s • REs. i' EXCEPTION ' DOCKET 5995 PAGE 1062 FP FLOODPLAIN,OR HIGH DENSITY VEGETATION, OR HIGH VISIBILITY H FP/HDV FLOODPLAIN, HIGH DENSITY VEGETATION NMI FP/HV FLOODPLAIN, HIGH VISIBILITY MIN HVMDV HIGH VISIBILITY, HIGH DENSITY VEGETATION • . FPMVMDV FLOODPLAIN, HIGH VISIBILITY, HIGH DENSITY VEGETATION 11110 EXHIBIT I-N (N) COMPOSITE MAP A Scale: 1BUTTERFIELD CROSSING 1 ' Contour Intervals DL&A "-G- Li COMM.BUILDING / CDNM tauII7c ril '',..‘,,.._..._ A57►WLt .if, ' s c, ci---1 II. I, d I iti, -14k -C=3 Alio. 1 r4f4 a 2" kilift; i " fi WI,'. li -4' i 1 iii ii I`� 'M. •/ n�a it.II pk4141141111,.. sir ' 11 o�,kil Cd 1 a cc f .11111iiiiiiktir 1 Liii ,_,......-1,0 ittli s g I tilettal F711:6"--- --01.;:17"3111 .r: --rsw°°- vki 11/10i. 1 tk )114 - -sr . 1 ":0- 40 ......p,000 • ,„A.1 „.,4_,....0 --.- - 4, 11 ' Ii 1,-.fry• ,.../ �. � I....,treo- -3 . / ems. e i / /ill 7 ,r--- tai ' �� ' SIXTH l[ .' i /., .s, x2s . :,/ N �SUFFO- . iR. WI KV tE MiliM��a� 7_, lc / (141111:1W1•1414.PliciFiti\.\! -1- (\ A 'Scales l" = 100' I ,i/i1I1iiL11IIøIti4! 1 Contour Intervals 0 , , 4I/A I ,P illibb t-II-1A 1.110.471°' • ---VAL m P r n \1 \ ---- FP FLOODPLAIN, OR HIGH DENSITY VEGETATION, OR HIGH VISIBILITY I III EXH I BIT I-N (S) FP/HDV FLOODPLAIN, HIGH DENSITY VEGETATION 1 I I I FP/HV FLOODPLAIN, HIGH VISIBILITY cJMPOSITE MAP HV/HDV HIGH VISIBILITY, HIGH DENSITY VEGETATION :WU FP/HV/HDV FLOODPLAIN, HIGH VISIBILITY, HIGH DENSITY VEGETATION isi BUTTERFIELD CROSSING PART II — LAND USE PROPOSAL II A. PROJECT OVERVIEW 1. Exhibit II A. 1. shows the boundaries of the requested TR zoning. This is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan land use designation for the property as well as existing zoning along the Oracle Road frontage. 2. The land uses proposed for the parcels are one and two story office buildings, with two story structures located furthest from existing residences. The maximum height of a two story structure will be 24 feet per Catalina Foothills Special Area Policy, 2-19, and the minimum setback of any building from the Oracle Road right-of-way will be 60 feet, which translates to 160 feet from centerline. The parcels will be sold for development by individuals in accordance with the plan, zoning conditions and CC&R's which will provide specific guidelines and controls pertaining to building height, setback, materials/colors/texture, landscaping, lighting, parking and similar features defining the quality and durability of development. The land utilization pattern is in response to design opportunities and constraints identified through careful analysis of existing physical conditions. Maintenance of privacy and property values in the adjoining Suffolk Hills neighborhood, as well as sustaining the scenic qualities along the Oracle Road frontage, were primary considerations. The minimum bufferyard width adjacent to CR-1 is 25 feet of enhanced natural desert. Trees along Oracle will be retained in place or transplanted into the bufferyard to preserve as -15- s f 35 z� -•.4AGE�- . i11, L.....j .dia — s _ a R c a i tit ----- . .s.:�. C8 --1 • . « ,.L •. s .. . • • ii it is 11111Mr s. _..• ,.. .. duec o 461 c. . , -- , . .. . 1 1 A NM ll r_fc. .4 CBiwip I jp%. DRiv i.�11� dv R • .. . _ ilWai T . S i. a 1: TR " i in 1W 00‘ =. 110 /. 1, 11 NI ..„ i wall. 1, 1 t J SR . i‘ II Mr: 1 • Iraf 3a lia ) IN 1 IMANN 9 v.. 4 II.A /- • '.• a b } 1Fr . MAC HA S,,v, iis ... ... ,. I.110p,• eNit= L . CRk: I , . 4.11.„../i / •w►• • ,11, ii,,,, .., .. ,4•9°. IV ...0"1 j 4 R5_ [\\\\\ REQUESTED TR ZONING EXHIBIT II-A. 1 N Scale: = 400 REZONING REQUEST A DLE.TA BUTTERFIELD CROSSING many of the existing visual characteristics as possible. The CC&R's for all buildings will be particularly focused on the attractiveness of building elevations, materials, colors and textures. A southwestern architectural style of Spanish Colonial, or hacienda, or ranch, or Joesler eclectic will be required throughout. II B. PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1. Removable overlay maps in the pocket show the land use pattern, drainage features and retained natural vegetation on a topographic contour base. All natural drainage features will be preserved protecting buildings located close to washes by placing rock rip-rap in locations not visible from off-site. The terrain characteristics will be minimally altered by grading. 2. Exhibits II B.1 (N) and (S) depict the Preliminary Development Plan for the property. Both sites in the BOZ are depicted with 50 percent natural open space. The building areas are numbered for convenient reference. The dashed lines show the building envelopes. a) The maximum gross floor area of office buildings on the north parcel will be 9,000 square feet because of BOZ limitations. The maximum gross floor area on the south parcels will not exceed 49,800 square feet. It is possible that later requests for open space, exceptions will be approved, but they are not addressed here. b) No building or part of a building closer than 100 feet to any residential zone will exceed one story or 20 feet in height, and two story buildings adjacent to -16- s COMPLIANCE WITH BUFFER OVERLAY ZONE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS BUILDING COLOR AND REFLECTIVE FINISH: All buildings visible from outside the parcel boundary will be earth tone in color to blend in with the natural setting. Colors will not exceed a light reflective value of 60 percent. Mechanical equipment will be screened and painted to reduce visibility. FENCES AND WALLS: To be determined at time of permit application. LIGHTING: External lighting shall be limited to that necessary for safety, security and identification. As uses are non-residential, there will be no backyard spot lights, no tennis courts and no pet enclosures. It is not contemplated that parking areas will be lit, and building and signage lighting will comply fully with Design Review criteria. PARKING LOTS: All parking lots will be screened to reduce visibility from roadways and public preserves. SETBACK: Not applicable. UTILITIES: All new utility lines will be placed underground. VEGETATION: Only approved plants shall be used in landscaping. Where removal of existing plant material cannot be avoided, all reasonable efforts shall be made to relocate salvaged plants into open space areas. These restrictions will be secured by covenants running with land. TRAIL ACCESS: Not applicable. WASHES: All washes will be left in their pre-development state except that a crossing of the small wash in the larger southern parcel may be required to distribute traffic to a signalized intersection in the future. OPEN SPACE: Requirements for natural and functional open space preservation will be complied with and secured by covenants running with the land and / or conservation easements. 16 (a) 1• I COMM.BUILDING J ii N _ ASPHALT \L 5 k comm.. 1 2S95 2582.44 �, CONCRETE CURBS ►,�,'= 2598 — _ter I Ig .. 9,0• ‘—a'i'l.l --- Ji tI hi , r Igigr 1,7 i •i : pRN`24 FEET( ) ., 1I ; 0.w`et ,di Ile _ ilif -riM 141 1.10 C g :5 116:411 c _____ kr iiiimliim o0 w ,„ „Box ,, ..4i.V.7 2 v4 •.1r---, 1 10 ),11/14-0)- _ _ _„„A.vRT lit ..Ar Goe-01110 .......mgr-40.--wwwor.vi,-...legibei4„,,, , ei ,c, dicgatakeedb:±mi-4‘.....ana.-,,,u.,A:- rooJeavalig 307 <1. - 4 46 J.. ` . •IIIIIMIRa a.LgO •' \i6 xi v i a J air 1`‘r i. 258, )3-- i / L ' , t'--i ,,--7-. ALL LANDSCAPING WILL BE XERISCAPE • EXHIBIT II-B. 1 (N) PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN, NORTH NI Scale: 1„ _ '00' BUTTERFIELD CROSSING A I Contour intervals DL&A • • - - • --- - : 1 . • .„ •-'" / \ s\ I til COM.BUILDING • i / CCM.BUILOING 1:ylilir-,'...-<••08...4. - _....... \ . \ /If/ ‘ \ •----!.. , .., /litil. l•• .. __ •/ ' //PA 1 I \. \ ---•--------- /1 C.C)../18—I i -.. I . .. ........„ .i , -----Ale.1144-__L--- ,. il 'l';',. it.1'0. \ - \ ....' r 114:77-,-- ,,,,' c---7-"'-• • . 11:1/., ... -1 (71\ iii .-.. - . ;/ ' /NI \----i517 2571 It? ... ./ '.;i: f; .:• • --.• 1 15 Li -• ° ‘ i / I / •; 6 ,•• 4, 1 I i I---'- \• - ' 1.'t I it (.2573.2 . . . L..,. , . / ---- ts.-I-- \ k .,' -- • N.1 .. // •.' 4461\ i• /-H6 I:-.• a 0 i .)‘si \ \ I .I "".""•c--.. . .I. /.// 1 2! piiced la r.i.tFi, ,•___ ,-; ! - -- . -4. I.: / • . • 4 , i 5; / .7, _ • ) .)) 1,, A\.. .., .4. , ., i.,. , " - 7 - '- .: I t . , ,. /...,z',,..c-r-zA ;•-• ri -- k..:.:..T./....,._ -)1 I--, - ...-.so• . • y .A.) ,• ,. 14 ..-7 • -- N 1600 . . 1111114..,.....4i ) . '4..........4-•1, i.,i, . •, HC . -., -5, .‘...t...... •I.:1 I • /- /i i. '1 i 8U4.0/kG• ...:,':t\•. 'I. . . . . . •.AI, , . elp '. _• ' '' •?2564.4 • - 6 1-STORy 240A I k5:73- 1,4. ' 4f1 • 1 • - . .Pr. \ . CI :... . .rveli .... r '1 \- ..- ).'..*1.1 o.t .' .. iz . i ir- --,:•''' .i /., L.-12.200-r, C3Jr •-•••-... -.g.Fr , . : 8 \ / '. :•••• • , _ ../ ,. .. .J. / .. 0 E' z I (..1 -.ffk- . ((• - • p., /4lik _ i . / I/spkc,E,3 • _,. >.1 f r:-\' i .,., 11.1 t a g.z . . , , ... .e.....,,,,.1.4 ile• —.I i -4 ji...0‘ 1--Y . . X .)\ --2_.--- . eo, (9 / !(,5,• . -• • • I ) -- _ ...... --'-',. •-.i,'-' 4' z, __. .. , fr , ,• , - . 4 ..6, HC 2 ' 1-7,0.-.1 . ' 9 . •/-. <7.55•24.6.1 .1.456112;‘: . .. . I 1 • ,'.2813ACee ' ,''', ) '.s. .., 1 3562-‘'. .. .-.4.--1 -k 'Th-. - -- :;,•1' --;,-c' ( • ../ "d' ' . • . i" 1 '.) • \.- --. ''''''' : •• s.. •C'L . ,:-..,. ( . Y.,-. .' .-', - -,• —, -.„. /.. \•. ......_ ;• , , • . . . - " .----- (--- 2-.)-.5.5. 6 -(. • ---) ' .-.. 3: ,.,,,,i,.:-._ • •,,- - - , , 1 . .. •-IPrfr•--: • -• ' • . , • !/..;/ „.., . i . -' ..,0 . -4.- ._ ; _-- - ' _--- •/,',/ . . ..--1 `-,---:., v. ,-,.. .' , 1,,,,te:r-- c.L.9....) f 1,.1 1-STO ,.,,20 FT., *N„).1 i•: / • , . :I..,".......?. y:i., .:. - :. .ur' ,j ,.. , (7) ulloas.p.,E1.,f, 6 (1) / ./ : / (• i-_.._ sox. - ., • -. ----• _-*• , . ) . ) 3 .<;--,\I 7 2 NC 1 1 it.i / :-••••••< -- • •-- --C111-YEAr .2.354.:; oc-Kr:5626:----•- ,zi.1 .' )11:1-:'. i 2271,CS . ,... _._(:, s! .../ :.. ,1 ',.,../., : ',-.'\- 1 / 2 .: 1, ,XCEPTIO.:.:".. .102 4:4:' :7 ---' .(---21 '; 1\4,4•)-:,- . he: ' . ,, /4,7r •••• ,(' i • ,-- \,• • . ,—7L. .' .••1 o • c„...,- \,......_ ,.,....;) • / fp i ,, • 4 • , ,....- ,j / ,,.... / i i 1..„2,25%4NHANCED"D --''`•...s.. '' • ....... •••. i •1 / / .. Z - \ • ss a s,,,„ . . ,_....".1kV \.,2.9. / S'89 4e- w • - -•• • . •: • .. • .---. / •- ' • t - 'suFFor-K.._.Q.F3• ..., . .ix. ...i :.. i .;,....: : . •. , 4 2554.9 • ;zee t, 0 41 .--ri'; A t '.. .. - . iv re 4s• •k'il' j",; .. ;' '' . .-1 '.. •1 3,, ' 1\ • Ct ._/.. '139. •• - • • - 200<16',' • , . . • • . „ • • , • • 7 ii ‘I.At • ' :.'(..\ '\ N. • ,,I. / , ., ITN • , . • -- .. ,. . - --ny.- , • C - , ) 7. . , \ •25,, , 1 \ . , .... 4. --4,.. ,' • fi 2HC -.4_.iN.,., -•._...,.. ii,,L , \ . / ... ! ,,,, .. 60' ' .•• ---- -.—--V——--... —--7.----•:-:-- -a——.7‘1 ._. .. , ,.ii, flf,il2;. I:'i .. ,,,, I ( ,A„ 1 • '. Kota ;\,?,', ....•\ ,•i 1 ', %.. 8 \--r, t 7 - .1 'BUILDING.AREA I '2-STO RY,74"FEET I 1 1LDING AREA--- 1 . ..:41 1 \.\‘‘\. . 1,7ST9RY10.,,FT.... \ I rtll Al `: 1 \'••\ Fes. '• .\ I i 7 0.._Inn icl:FT\. ......... '1/4. 1 0(. .1 li 1 ..- I. ; ••, iii9111 I..,... t.:1SQ• ________,.1 j......-:::-.,C---:7-,---•--'."-9 t I 1 ---. \ tiiki,i, • • _..... _.,.,-,--,_..„ ,. • •.......--- \ 11 \- : -,------\.. I. 2559.06 , ------,—— 7- . DIRT MAO ---.-7,.. 7-- ... ..— lope I..,,.(0. ...--...) ,st! H; —770-24-3.57. to'15`11.111L EASE.''"---- ---e ..,,/r ,.E.__IV?"_4,,.. .- it,_ ""\1.4.-. ••••.,,`..... .,- ' - VI, _.-0 - .,,/0 c /f( ',.........---) I --)Y 1 __ , . _• •- i . ,-- /--- ,/ --.) / Lv„,... • . / ___ —...„ t: t! :: . ; c ...., ___-------- ,./. r .. •-,---,--/c r. ,f , , ALL LANDSCAPING WILL BE XERISCAPE • EXHIBIT 11-B. 1 (S) PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN, SOUTH fil scale: 1" = log . A 1' Contour Intervals RI TriTRFIFID CROSSING Oracle Road, but no closer than 160 feet to the centerline, may be 24 feet in height. c) The total number of parking spaces is 45 for the north parcel and 249 for the south parcels. d) Landscaping will be with drought tolerant native plants or acceptable native type alternatives. f) Drainage courses are not to be obstructed or disturbed except for placement of erosion control measures (rip-rap) if required following geotechnical evaluation. II C. EXISTING LAND USES 1. There are no existing land uses on the sites. Inasmuch as there are no uses, there is no impact, Instead, the proposed development will result in infill of Oracle Road frontage with compatible uses similar to those already in place. 2. The development characteristics proposed for the site will be very similar to the adjoining neighborhood except in areas along the Oracle Road frontage, where two story buildings are proposed. The scale of development is of a lesser degree than the two shopping centers at Oracle and Magee, and the retention of significant areas of natural vegetation both in washes and along the Oracle frontage will help diffuse views of the buildings in much the same fashion as mature vegetation in the Suffolk Hills neighborhood provides a softened, mature appearance. -17- II D. TOPOGRAPHY AND GRADING 1. There will be no development on slopes of 15 percent or greater. 2. The hillside development zone does not apply. 3. Exhibit ii D. 3 (N) and (S) shows areas to be graded, areas to be revegetated, and areas to remain natural open space. North Parcel. This parcel is next to a completely disturbed and developed area: the Escondido Shopping Center. Fill has been placed to a height of nine feet adjacent to the west portion of this parcel to accommodate a commercial building. A 20 foot alley exists as right-of-way but has not been graded along the north boundary. Fifty (50) percent of the site plus the alley to the north is proposed to be graded, and 50 percent is proposed to be left natural and / or enhanced through supplemental planting. Five (5) percent of the graded area, or approximately 1500 square feet, will be restored by landscaping in the parking lot and in the vicinity of buildings. South Parcels. The parcel north of Suffolk Drive is proposed for development as four distinctly separate office buildings separated by washes or the entry drive. Because drainage features are to be left natural, they will occupy 27 percent of the site, and other natural open spaces used as bufferyards will occupy an additional 23 percent of the site. Grading for buildings and parking vvill require e 50 percent It cif the site, of which approximately 5 percent, or 5,000 square feet, will be restored by decorative landscaping. The parcels south of Suffolk Drive are proposed to be graded, developed and -18- . . • corn.BuuotHc .. I li i i i asPrwt i ' � s e comm.sunou+o ' 4s 2582�� , `` 4n.v of CURB --------____i1 CCI4CP i11114121141br oqrw j 011 iiiiki'IC ‘7411 all TigTirot • OR 24 FEET( _ 0 t i ittrA441 4. N , - it _ 6 !aili0 . //)12. 4::,„ �' �''�� � 6 7� 4146,0,0- g 1 i-. .. Alf. _____ / AgPralill Wr 4 4 _ .30., wi' L,., ,„,,..., ,, ,.._, ..,... .. N NO A Aft '' I 1° OA' airgiii0" 1.....,iii7.4e,46, ,. ..:t. _ ..........44—......w. ..a.,..,40,,,,„. . _, _ _cu,VERT a . Q ____ , ... ., dif_ ftut_Reile:pi_m...i.w.-4:rox-,5-aakirwor 3 y rar. '' - ' ,....:1"-"'-,..."---- ""' woo. __ --- - ...•......' 0 ZS92.5 U- (:. - /. i fiAlk- 1, --->- ; I I _/K4-____<:_, • EXHIBIT II D.3(N: GRADING BUTTERFIELD CROS SIN( Scale: 1" = 100' A 1' Contour Intervals DL&A a \ I .- - \ ill ca.t eutt oa+o A• ' "'et.eucwo+c I�jl �. . ./ .••••• :li!'I -: k ', . . .---,----4,1------ ,,-.• ,-i-...-- • - ‘, ..k. .. ) / ..;n• • -. :; i . Nrif N .,...:',r..... —,,,,... .(!) ,.. 4,'. :.....,),...** .2.' (I) 1... - . • _ . . 1 i , ..).• log ..,, .) ' .,,...• -: , . .„ , ... „ ,. , . . • 4, :: :;::„.: •., .. -.4, I ,. i .• 4-.. .. ,.. • ' i : ,.., . 4"/ ' IV •••*"`".......... i•• // • ) '-.- / . 411 I (-7-.) I;.. // • kJ -.\ • t• -is\ • • 1. • 2570— LiI i. 3 "r''' 0 11°-•.'•7 5 1 �,,�e x 160e 111111.Ii �/ %• iii ' • r-GRADING LI ��--�, • .. c) • r ,.... .0..... CC ! I: . w _ r 4 • .-(,i 4 �N. i. v . /"'� 1. OS • ..i 7, — (cg...,-) ,` tik le 2559.61 2562.14 1t �^ r — 2563.5 I - , Q.J • :c;• - .1,,s .BUILD G Rh• �, ° (..� i r • A 1—STO ,2 FT. J'1 1 RES. 77, • °P('� r .ji• 7) 4400 SQ.FT.`d' ` '1 ' • , t 3 �y 7 2HC ( .W f 1 / �� / ---__ ■nu./ ..CKR 5905►.'1062J = 4 / 10 I' 1 1: / 2�Y �� 10 / 1 i �� �: ( j .25 NHANCED"D ` �� 1 i /I l • �� .—, • I �.------ 5 SUFFOLK .....-DR. . . . \ *r.-\ . ...... •imam, . gar :rill: O`er, 4 ' lir] \ .\ Cj 1 — 256. \' \� 44 9 6 21iC T 7 2HC 3 6 I W P.'RADED /, ——•— ---- V ——— — i�ATED �� RADIN IMITS ---�1 + : ' EGE� iF.: . ----\ I ' : jf1 9 1RES. 9 L �-�a��-. _—__...�.1 Lr�-—.._...,.—Am......Idl ` :l l -1W--------- -- ' 119.42.10 ��. 1 • ...o + � 1,o a.�sr .o!6' UTII_E/1SsE >t ` .4 iv r h 2555- �� 1 N ale: 1" = 100' EXHIBIT II—D3 (S) A s�1' Contour Intervals GRADING DL&A BUmRFIELD CROSSING 1 CONK BUILDING ;.. 1 ii i !11111.1111111111610... 5 ASPHALT r 2582.44 COMM.BUILDING ' :59 S �- i -__ .���■� �� � CDNCRETE CURB •.. 40A--------tAWVER ---- II‘ ilir-L, --. 1 --',7L..‹k:. -. II j '1111t (17 \�j,--• VII ! -..,N� t i9 5.';='M ',' _ i- ,/ OR 24 FEET( op:: Iir S -�I W 111 c : ilYNO 9,O.S SQ.FT. /atol..,&. -..-471111. a ‘11144101 10- c . ' *1°A! I,-,,,,-. . QI. Fell-heti , ' -;::.' r cil . ___ I iii. WA 0011.7. •;S 1:ilk 4dtt 9$5, ,' t' Sift," iiiiiit J i x " tibm4 ii,"1:a fLi-4411Pliknotsrsiri... -,40110.014 1.7 ''• ii 0 OEM ' .4 717:Ael\II aa.ia-iv,-::,i-z4-x, ----.;;=r-:i'ik-Ojikr Q `.�. r — _ � N r / 3 y" t i ii 0 \� \- S92.S (..__ ` �tr ---- --4.)t 4 : : —r• N 2480 ,c. ( 7 + ' - � 1 J RFS. • r ....... ',,Vi ENHANCED BUFFERYARDS EXHIBIT IID.5(N) AN wale: 1" _ 100' MITIGATION 1•' Contour Intervals aLEA BUTTERFIELD CROSSING a ` ::f)'-.,-\/.:2,N', . L., ` I i t;;t .\:---:• .„,,,,. ':;:-...1.,1 !' , ,�1$PHAC_T.- --- - N 14 7:6 1 0 •ORB I t/ ' 1!I, •1 ;' 1 _ -� •. ,� ,., I j 1x2570.2 {}?• ?{ 1.;1 - 'Ho 1- o O 1 1 :::::::•: 1 1 7// i0.N.l44. 1.'...7..'.,,. AAY- Ed la . 0,1- �� ::; 1 a ' 80, . 1 3 t'H . ,. 1. .-- . 25.70__ : • j-y N i650 .J , -:! . t'�, • He •f •5. J 2y�0' illit‘s. ' ' I. ' 1 6 /eU1L01N / : 1 s•: .2564.4 7-STORYG AREA .1 .•'•*. . I .20 I .,:c J' 1 /aP ' r-q,...._k. ..) . So 'N —... - .1 ....--ot, CD IX m 1 z � y� l 1'• •1 SPdcE J 1.::, ,•:: ,i // J Z j o o a/ 0�.. a 7 S • s i•-••-: --........ . 'L';i::::::..:”:.::7:::::: '1.1 I. . ---?. Q 2 • •'255e.3 R HC 2 • `7 .. \1 9 `'1 6 S'y•561.8 • �b�/2559.61 Y 22 S �1•. 7iJ -• P O . 2562.1 tS', 1 /, ::;i.S•(i: ' \ J fge i . •: • 1 \ 5�3 I .BUILD G ARC •' ?,.• :'':•:: /. I :: :" 4•M ISO WOK (...1 ) Y,2 A :'�7 a 7/ E5. P--- �� I 9-STD 0 FT.. '':: ._, a :'..1. .• (-7) 4400 SQ.Fe'' • / / 1 B_X CUt VER f , 5.9 ' . , • i 3 , 1 7 2 HC 1 • : '1 / `� 101 4 1- 22SPACgS r *:` 1 1 �,Q/�-_�. XCKPTION _ IT L ! ram,•-_.•--i;::' '1 :1 /� ■2550 DOCKET 5995 P.1062 10 ':::::::•::.: •;•:. Z '• } ,::: 1 1, l l \ O Sign .. :: ;,fir'y M :•1••i:•:'::': •.:' 2555 / ' ....- •\` ' / // SUFFOLK OR. Z00 .7554.9 a,� p O. C_ > I. 4 /�\ . / " •,,,......,,::„..,. , • • :::• A ' :•. :.x.,.•. ti k: : .s.r rS zs6 # r \ j.f S.AC L.# ��a 'N,...__ / / I ' 8 9 2 HC:EA 7 7 :NC ri ♦ \\P�9` l. 1L 8 I. t .,'`��1 I BUILDING I 1 ILDING AREA _ • il I 2-STORY,24 FEET ( 1-STORY,20 FT. e '� e • . \ y ( 14.200 SQ.FT. i 1_ 9.200-SQ.FT. `' ' :: 4; . .- T-y 'C 2558.86 a • DIRT ROAD ^��/ r .. :::: 0 i 10 243.5r ,_.. 10 15' UTIL.EASE. li _8 ' • ' 1'9,92•a' ::'::•::_::_::: 1r ti ' 6' SCREEN WALL ; cbcco POSSIBLE RIP-RAP EROSION CONTROL; NOT VISIBLE FROM ORACLE ROAD -- ENHANCED BUFFERYARDS EXHIBIT II D.5(S) Scale: N = goo' N MITIGATION A 1 ' Contour Intervals DL&A BUTTER.FIELD CROSSING / ,,.' ' 1i ' . 1 5 0' _ .� ASPNa�_T —„ • 2582.4s i COMM.BU1L01ht ' '-S5 L �! ._ 2590 . ,.._____. CONCRETE CURa-, �_ , i4°Iii°- iiiii!l' -T -211111/444 :41 --••• Nitih;--- . ,..)71 t 1 6 lk iiiii gill.14.0:4711Lua, ,ik .1 , ,INWM1161611 I >0111104 .4krik40 OR 24 FEET( i ' .I 10... f� fflip 410 9,01,8 SQ. WED ...„.7._ IQ ,:ollir, , c.ti, I —IN/ i 0 0 I ,I_ _..... ...-.4114. Ili; i... . .. .,ink , , Cr ,I.: .2 oil'N._- .,"D.',' Vs I VZ I S• VI I 1,49 .• Tito, v• .0,4,145..,:: 1 0 PO T DEVELOPMENT DISCH RGE Qwo 1228 cf •1 R. 4...,..ir 1 •—• - 4w ,' • UNCH• ES A m 1� �S. ••:A • 10ifil `- :j ' Q �`E �• SB'�2 ._ __ 7 — '._ - _ _P_,or 25 . 3 0 cr mo , -- / .A i Ail ,ir 0.. rtriir--- ' --,,, i es,lt- .:7\ , ® 0 7 — /7- / °5•35 ( 1 ..' /I,j)i P /" ri:i 1 m / f / 1� c`` iQ • FLOODPL IN LtMy�'—�'7 •TtON - ' DOCKET;5995 PAC Nal • SS STORMWATER STORAGE LOCATION REGRADED CONTOURS EXHIBIT IIE 1 /2 (N) ENGINEERING / HYDROLOGY BUTTERFIELD CROSSING NScale: 1" =100' A 1 ' Contour Intervals DLEYA . •�1 Co►«etnl0lPC i ; C.o•1.BUILDING j i�j� 1 f;, - .. ,1. : I -r--z_j ,. e ,.„:„. w-7, ., , ,• CD I: - i4 %wd r v. 23>5 / •A ' l 3> • • • • / SS • 3 f• ;� t� r f:;1 ;44,.. • i- tt f6.0i EVER ifil o1I 1 —\ j- - ,. •• __. -.,t• .. 0, tc f 5 1 1 ,. rdi 1 it 9.n. '''' .. / . (7) 9 l ' \' Ls--)......).Yli.2-es.111;..1.-- 27‘t....<1 W I I 4 :7: .7-4,..a.1 II;'''' .4. 7 0.:e*..'.i 1114i;"''FI1/4\\:417 •-...... CC i h ' lib —J I •I • Tr/ : ••.T. • .t,c,......? 2, s tH 4 •/ ! �'y OF/ S S •••1• ., �, � • Le �y� •1 ) SS ` 2%2.1. ,"u'i„ - „ a��`,�''r 7 */ r-------'-'. ..• t r J• `CAL+ . .►� `' `1.,M`Z ■zs6 .r• / An • '• / 7- i . A . 114 s /**1 ....i. m.....-_—,„,s, . . .... . .. • i.-7*Yi 43 ---:-- V4. '<----2- r e0t«A.,„ , .4, :. 3 . 7 2HC 1 6 !. 1 is / ��� =MOP it • - - / 2 4 1. P 0ST D:VELOPMENt DISC - L SS .t < ('�100 �+ i e ��,55 ;UNCHANGED 1200 .2ss,.9 ,• $ SUFFOLK DR. o o STO:M b l• 5�lirigkir C- 1 �,. \ ! i.`! ��• w ,a w t RNA • 0 \ • d ._•._iO 6 ` I ' �7 \ \ r, ' zs6• \• 44 r SS , \��`f`. , _,/ f� e 6 2HC 7 2NC 3 S i • \ ' /la � r———•--- —— ——_________.1 I k• �\ 1 (/''....• ' ' 1«L \\ \ F,-► I 8 I i -----\SS YN 1 \ i ..\ i . il : ., cc, ' it --- . .4 • IiIiT____- :SS _ _-l- ' •. tie o I. 1 �l i.,0 74337 10 15' Un—EASE. (� • �9q.92 io �- ® O ••.A•26•E W n 2555 ' , ',r-1,401 e •, RIPRAP SS STORMWATER STORAGE LOCATION EXHIBIT II E 3/5 (S) ENGINEERING / HYDROLOGY A Scale: 1" = ' BUTTERFIELD CROSSING 1 Contour Intervals — — necessary to repeat this section of the report five times in order to cover all of the details. North Parcel 1. The POP responds to the North parcel's hydrologic characteristics by locating the building as far as possible from the wash and providing a parking lot area through which peak flows can be conveyed. The entry drive is as far north as possible (geometrically, and to avoid trees) so that depth of flood flow over the paved surface can be minimized. Exhibit II E. 1 / 2 (N) depicts the situation. By working within the framework of existing grades and by minimizing cut and fill —just to smooth out the surface — the parking lot will follow the natural slope of the site, drain properly and will not obstruct flood flows. The actual access lanes of the parking lot will provide all-weather access even during the flood peak, as there will be only about one foot of water in that portion of the parking lot. The cross section through the parking lot will equal or exceed pre- development area in order to maintain or increase stormwater conveyance capacity. Tree planters will be flush with the pavement, not curbed, to facilitate flowage. The building floor level will be raised one foot above flood levels with no difficulty, as the building is on the higher portion of the ground. In summary, the development pattern will "smooth" out the northern floodplain -20- limits and confine the floodplain entirely to the parking lot portion of the site without raising water surface elevations by more than 0.1 foot nor velocity by more than 10 percent, producing an overall beneficial effect on the drainage pattern. 2. It is not possible to avoid encroachment by parking into the existing floodplain due to the facts that 1) the floodplain occupies more than 68 percent of the site and 2) there is no alternative access to the buildable area. Fifty foot erosion hazard setbacks can be observed under this development scenario. Increased discharge from a post-development condition will be mitigated by "retention" storage (including detention) of approximately 2900 cubic feet of stormwater by a variety of means, including basins, north parking area and underground tanks. The water level and velocity of flow exiting the site should remain unchanged from — or less than — predevelopment conditions. 3. Post-development stormwater discharge entering and exiting the site will remain the same as pre-development. Exhibit II E 1 / 2 (N) shows possible stormwater storage locations. 4. It is not anticipated that there will be any additional impacts above pre- development conditions as a result of this development, either upstream, downstream or south of the wash. 5. Exhibit II E. 1 / 2 (N) shows the location of the retention facilities, culverted crossing of the drainage adjacent to Oracle Road and the channel of the wash preserved in its natural state. -21- 6. The PDP conforms to all applicable Pima County policies relating to flood control. South Parcel — Buildings 3 and 4 1. Exhibit II E. 1 / 2 (S) shows Buildings 3 and 4 on the Oracle Road side of a small wash with a peak pre-development flow of 161 cfs. Both buildings and parking are out of the floodplain; however, since portions of both buildings get to within 30 feet of the actual channel instead of the 50 feet normally required for watercourses with a 100 year peak discharge rate less than 2000 cfs, special measures will have to be taken to justify this setback reduction. These buildings are in all other respects responsive to existing hydrologic characteristics and this portion of the development will not affect the drainage pattern of the site. 2. There is no encroachment into the 100 year floodplain; however, measures to mitigate potential erosion hazards must be implemented. These include qeotechnical evaluation of the stability of the soil to withstand erosion or placement of riprap erosion protection within or at the edge of the floodplain. 3. Post-development discharges will remain the same as pre-development. 4. There is not expected to be additional drainage impact to off-site land uses upstream or downstream. 5. Exhibit II E. 3 / 5(S) shows the possible location of riprap erosion control features protecting Buildings 3 and 4. Retention (approximately 2,000 cubic -22- feet) and detention of stormwater will occur in or beneath the parking lots pursuant to more detailed site engineering at the time the buildings are actually designed. The wash channel itself and attendant riparian vegetation will remain undisturbed. 6. Except for the need to reduce the 50 foot erosion hazard setback, Buildings 3 and 4 conform to all other applicable flood control policies. Building 5 1. The PDP for this building responds in all respects to hydrologic characteristics of the site, including avoidance of floodplain and full compliance with erosion hazard setback policies. There will be no adverse effect on drainage patterns. 2. There is no encroachment into the floodplain and post-development discharges will be mitigated by five year threshold retention plus detention of stormwater. 3. Post-development stormwater discharge will remain at pre-development levels. 4. There are no increased potential impacts to off-site land uses resulting from the post-development condition. 5. The only visible engineering design feature that is related to Building 5 is a culverted crossing of the 161 cfs north — south wash. This will consist of two 18 inch CMP pipes to accommodate minor storm flow, with the road above and an allowance for overtopping of the driveway during major storm events. Head walls and energy dissipaters will be required to prevent head cutting -23- • erosion. This crossing will be the only alteration to the channel. Flood control policies call for stormwater retention in this basin, so that approximately 2,350 cubic feet of runoff must be provided for in site design. 6. The PDP for Building 5 conforms to all applicable flood control policies. Building 6 1. Building 6 is similar to Buildings 3 and 4 in that both the building and parking area are outside the floodplain but portions of the building are within 30 feet of the channel of the east I west wash. See Exhibit II E. 1 12 (S). There is an old dike north of the building that was installed by ADOT to direct stormwater flow to the box culvert at Oracle which will be retained in place and riprapped on the stream side closest to the building. In addition, so as not to have to rely on a "levee" for protection, the finish floor elevation of the building will be raised to one foot above "theoretical" flood levels, assuming the dike did not exist. There will be no change to site drainage patterns as a result of development. 2. Building 6 and attendant parking do not encroach into the floodplain. Increased post-development discharge will be handled by approximately 1,800 cubic feet of stormwater retention on-site (balanced basin) plus other detention as required. Erosion hazards, if any, will be abated by riprap, as stated in the paragraph above. 3. Post-development discharge levels will not exceed pre-development levels. 4. There are no increased potential drainage impacts off-site. -24- 5. The exhibit shows the approximate location of riprap adjacent to the dike as well as possible locations for stormwater retention within or adjacent to the parking lot. The east /west wash will be retained in its natural state. 6. The PDP conforms to all applicable policies. Buildings 7 and 8 1. Impact of off-site flows on the site are minor: 48 cfs. from the east. These flows can be interdicted by the 25 foot bufferyard along the east boundary which will be excavated for stormwater storage. Drainage patterns for off-site discharge are expected to be unaffected by development. 2. There is no need for any type of mitigation except retention storage of approximately 3,900 cubic feet of post-development stormwater discharges, which will occur in, beneath or adjacent to the parking lots. 3. Post-development discharges will remain at or below pre-development rates of flow. 4. There are no potential impacts to off-site land uses. 5. The exhibit shows possible retention / detention areas and quantities. No other engineering features are required. 6. The PDP complies with all Pima County flood control policies. II F. VEGETATION 1. Two-thirds of the 1.31 acre north parcel are considered to be high density vegetation. All high density vegetation adjacent to the east boundary and -25- 2. Mitigation measures with respect to vegetation on the north parcel will include the aforementioned natural open space borders along three sides of the property (50 percent of site area), preservation of the wash in a natural state, and salvaging of viable mesquite trees for replanting on-site. In the south parcels, where vegetation inventory and grading plans indicate a need to salvage, as much on-site vegetation as can practicably be relocated will be added to enhance bufferyards, and a program will be implemented to allow neighborhood residents access for purposes of removing certain species. As stated in Part II, D, 50 percent of the larger southern parcel will remain as natural or enhanced natural open space. 11 G. WILDLIFE 1. No endangered species or classified washes are known to be located on the site. II H. SOILS 1. Not applicable. II 1. BUFFER PLAN 1. Exhibit II — 1.1 shows bufferyard locations and types. The table indicates planting densities and screening elements that often exceed code standards. 2. Exhibit II 12 shows bufferyard cross sections along Suffolk Drive. The -27- .. III cBUILOING r2582.e / COMM.BUILDING I 25p5 ASPHALT .� � ONCRETECURAIPA . 4Alialteritibillittl /I C:—. _ i I r _n i r , • _ NITAh 1 39 5- Y 1 �_ t >/ (ikh:14N410OR 24 FEET( I �• � --_! 4,,k, I/i"� ` 9 0� SQ.FT. 4 rci I ����.triSll' qi •,• tilt, 1 .. r •, ..c, wools ., fi_:..,.‘ ,. /.. :. Lucc - ---- itv • i lie ib. / - - ., - c.„no, I, IL -4.- - NW eips . k. 1° Iss--,F2-4,-,goc, _,7. ,:.; .4 .-j - -`C":"--T--r 4 oil iNittie b*ail- °IkIlli \M1 III.W ecabt ---;447,.43:'1'L-•.,•,'-,1";0:.az.'1u,s'-.','.g.:10jp-sraM12100 7- ,.• ii crcr -• v'mmi...,," -...mr'-r...--.-..a,...----;s-.:-..,.-...,---6,----.,*--...7_,Te.„.,,,,,,,,,.,.._,..2;r„, .../,..),-)Gy ,i.. o 2° ssik,.. ......... --r-,----- e---•Vi -.-17.....:2 j-- •- ,c3.. , ai i-,-;:i---G, (_ ,:,,, ��o 2a8. (\ ► F�' 1,• 1.- i. • ( 7 + 1.1 ` 1 I t 1 I / 1 RES • 1' 1 fi I ENHANCED BUFFERYARDS EXHIBIT 11-1 N Scale: 1" = goo' BUFFERYAR( A ' ii Contour Intervals BUTTERFIELD CR0 S SII_ I ' , 1 •• !:;.1 , _. , __--.-.W....-,..,-;.,..., I ixte.1 j.....\ , L.")ASP►wlT e IL \,. ,‘.... .. I ,, , f i I =�Y 1 I::;: ', ) ..• ,,,P . , - .-., i t- 5f• , / .• E. i k' ''s :'''‘., ,i • i . . I I He O`O , , . '�`.` ......,..• s::::;i� -: .::::l.:5 D..*:__ ..., ... 27 Sp4 $ 1�- ' i 1� } :�;;��st'%r ram;: �� 7 4 . ' %, ' I - Li- •-• - , . - . _ -- 1 ::::i,i,..-;:: ,.... / `_J He f / 10. jii: .1 „. 5 'I 3 I---:', • 'i • / /. '---, :r 2520— n 1688 /jiff / I t j •iiii I` 'L9 �. 1-Sr GAF f . I I .2564.. to 0 :::. : 111 • W f— a • / • ja3 : /o�i we-, #411 t. . 1--..... 1 2.2 00 I jf:::::i::'4. 1,,i. ,-,'' / CD CC il a / Q,vLI) 1 �—.� RBI• / 4 j '� 1 `J o dl ♦1.� • �'c�r so• � ; :} j �� r 9_ �_ k+� •{G @ HC2 ,,, ,- 9 1 C. /f•• •6- • •561.8 . 059.6I r 22 SP , 6 'fit ) I •J...-- , i:. 9 i5I • �� .'..j• am • F.......:.::•:::::::::. :fS'•.. . • ,f illibl-ir77..., . ::: iris. '''',� .ti KE ,56-3 , 1 .BUILD G AREA' A'',f * / „D `. ;: ,so °t ( l�� • ). 1 1-STO ,20 FT..•.'vz:: 1/ REs- .;i'7. r ' ` -' (4400 SQ.FT. .1:: ::"............... / / 1 @Ox CUf VER! 5.9R • 1 \ ] /� 7 2HC 1 '} •I•I l `�\ / _______-.. r 1 . 1,.. ,, 4 . .1/4 • •255,1 DOCKET 6905 P.1062 =•:? :':: .•+`: t0 _ N' :•..:titi'',•^';.•,•.k+;ti•.' .:1): . , ...,..;.*,;:17:.::5.-.:.:.:;---...........!::::::' 'i:ji:ii,/-•:•::;•:•:••:•:• I.I / / .: i 1...4... •�I ... '� �. • �S�'• • ::!:• •�.�`,` '•yyam�•..}}►► ., �,'�,• ;,•• `�"�:?:;1 /f/ /( / O S,gn K ..�wh[!�` c". ..' ' •I-.-ill•• "31:�•: .'I I�i.•.,...A. - ,2555 SUR-i K DR. • zea .2554.9 a� OC___ �. :;. ! 7] /\ \ • Eel ;Mani-, tAet.S.:Niaca,..2 ,11 ;.- ''''...'''' Vagarj., .::.:.:.:.:. \ , 4 . 4 ,t . rk: 256 {}ti::� � \ s. �.il ,8 6 2HC 7 • 7 tHC • ] ` s •v? w \ I LZr=i► I I •k ,nv1,n f , ' /1 �.� 1 BUILDING ,AREA ' 1 ILDlNG AREA �•�•:ti;_ .1 \ cf� ! 2-STORY,24 FEET � 1 STORY,20 FT. �I71S \ 4 i .w� d,, ' RES. I ,a,200 SQ.F�. L—- 9.2U@ SQ_FT. j I i�155 2550.86• fr_DIRT ROno— Il_— — �Jl 3j:` • 1 , i - - -- ., _`__ �titih i • .:, • �50 }... .o.ui}i: lii za3s7 10 1�` ttTiL.EASE- I•I A _ Id�.9r w •' g l.--Y h ' 6' SCREEN WALL .. . •• '''• ENHANCED BUFFERYARDS EXHIBIT 11-1. 1 A ScBUFFERYARDS i' Contour Intervals DL�A BUTTERFIELD CROSSING �6/1 -. .+.'._ Z2e,'vf ( cc/74' 22Z 20 - - — .,:::.,-, „A--- Pam. ►,1/4-E�1 T 1,,, 114.1. -,t fa . ii,; -...;‘; to )r- .0' ior •• i),, - iltilli ' r .. Ilf-i -6 rrS i i•.... =sz. loo -FEET W I ICIeEd 6-g0e56 Oienr,or_o Zo ' AO" cisi4u. lc to 15 i'EQd eav 10 ' 4o" WAu_ 8 6 I Z. r.. ___. . I A tr( I if 1 411111401... 1--- - Zp-25 ' ___ ._► of comae ,J,ef(/ ( T' / '€) 25 -40 ........ ._ ..... __, a_ . . ir . ::,:m.pirir Tik-: ...: _ ioriD ino . Op 4, it Av., laio Apr. . ei le* 0 ::- 4*.t 41:-- W-1-0-nt kliAt*IC4 ---Egg 4-ke-L112246.14 IRD6E.ED Z5 i 40" \tkIALI- I° I ° 15 C.. -QL.1 i '3=-0 26 4o" oc-E 6 8 i2_ EXHIBIT II — 1 .2 BUFFERYARD DETAILS minimum bufferyard adjacent to CR-1 is 25 feet in width, enhanced with native plants transplanted from other graded portions of the site. Bufferyard "D" specificiations are as follows: IMPROVED BUFFERYARDS PER 100 FEET LOCATION WIDTH WALL / FENCE TREES SHRUBS ACCENTS SUFFOLK (S) 20' 40"* 10 10 15 SUFFOLK (N) 25' 40* 10 10 15 SUFFOLK (N) 40' N/A 12 12 18 EAST OF 6 / 7 25' 40"** 10 10 15 EAST OF 5 40' N/A 6 6 0 WESTOF3 / 4 / 8 10' 6'* 10 10 15 EAST OF 1 40' N/A NATURAL WEST OF 1 70' — 100' N/A NATURAL *Decorative Masonry Wall **Open Fence 11 J. VIEWSHEDS 1. Measures to minimize visual impact from structures and other development features are: North Parcel a. Views and vistas from off-site are screened by existing native vegetation -28- which may be enhanced by transplanting of other viable trees and cacti. b. Areas of high and medium visibility will be screened by landscaping in bufferyards, and height of buildings closest to single family residential areas will be limited to one story. Height of structures adjacent to Oracle Road may be two stories or 24 feet. Light reflectance rating of all structures will be limited by CC&R's and the BOZ. South Parcels a. Views and vistas from off-site will be protected by retention or placement of vegetation in bufferyards adjacent to Oracle, Suffolk Drive and the east boundaries of the parcels. b. Areas of high and medium visibility from off-site locations will be subject to restrictions such as single story height limitation adjacent to residential zones, 24 foot height limitation adjacent to Oracle, extra width buffers adjacent to residential zones and restrictions on light reflectance. II K. TRAFFIC 1. Access Points — The north parcel must access Oracle Road at a point as far south as practicable (approximately 220 feet from centerline to centerline) from the south shopping center access point. Access to Buildings 3, 4 and 5 on the larger south parcel must also be from Oracle Road due to drainage patterns north of Suffolk Drive and to reduce office generated traffic in that portion of the neighborhood collector street. This access point is -29- • approximately 220 feet south of the next northerly access point to Oracle Road. It is not practical to shift this driveway further south due to drainage patterns. Access to Buildings 6, 7 and 8 will be off Suffolk Drive west of the Suffolk Hills subdivision. The location of these driveways was dictated substantially by the goal of preserving existing trees in the right-of-way and in the bufferyards, and ADOT policies re limiting direct access to Oracle Road. 2. Off-Site Improvements -- None of the parcels specifically require off-site road improvements as a prerequisite for development. However, the proposed installation of a traffic signal at Oracle and Suffolk Drive will provide a substantial benefit to the offices using Suffolk Drive, as it will enable employees / customers to turn left onto Oracle each signal cycle. Although not shown on the Preliminary Development Plan, a connection between buildings 3, 4 and 5 and Suffolk Drive via the site of building 6 may be constructed in the future, after the signal is installed, to give those buildings access to the signal. 3. Maximum potential development of the North Parcel at a rate of 25 daily trip ends per 1,000 square feet of floor area* could generate 225 vehicle trips per day, 113 entering and 113 exiting, which is nominal in terms of the volumes and capacity on Oracle Road. Maximum potential development of Buildings 3, 4 and 5 could generate 506 vehicle trips per day, 253 entering and 253 *Assumes business and professional office use. Medical office traffic generation is 60 percent higher. -30- 0 exiting, again a nominal impact on Oracle Road. Together, buildings 1 — 5 will attract 390 vehicles per day, which is 2.3 percent of the one-way traffic volume on Oracle Road. Some of these will likely be "pass-by" trips in which the vehicles will have been on Oracle anyway. Other "destination" trips will enter Oracle traffic flows only when there is a break in passing traffic. Maximum possible development of Buildings 6, 7 and 8 could generate 700 vehicle trips per day, 350 entering Suffolk Drive and 350 exiting . The amount of entering traffic would be relatively unnoticeable, as vehicles would turn into Suffolk Drive from Oracle and almost immediately enter parking lots without ever reaching the residential area. Exiting peak hour traffic, possibly as high as 12 percent (or 42 vehicles) during the evening peak, would be more noticeable as there might be vehicles stacked on Suffolk Drive waiting for breaks in the traffic flow on Oracle to turn right or left. On the other hand, that flow is opposite the incoming evening peak hour into the Suffolk Hills subdivision, so that it would not conflict substantially with subdivision generated traffic. Again, the numbers are relatively small and the magnitude is not significant in terms of the capacity of Suffolk Drive to convey vehicular traffic. 4. Suffolk Drive, with a 60 foot right-of-way, is deemed to be a collector street not a local street. The impact at the intersection with Oracle could be reduced by construction of a separate right turn lane, so that local traffic wishing to exit the -31- neighborhood northbound would not be delayed by vehicles waiting to turn left. The possible impact on the neighborhood to the east, however, is a matter of more concern with respect to development of Buildings 6, 7 and 8, as traffic exiting these properties might choose to use a local street —Village Avenue — to get to signalized intersections at Magee and Ina, unless and until a new signal were installed at Oracle and Suffolk Drive. Assuming a 50 — 50 split between southbound and northbound exiting traffic, that would indicate 175 daily southbound destinations and a corresponding desire to turn left at Oracle. Assuming that two-thirds of these vehicles (a very high percentage) chose instead to go through Suffolk Hills and Catalina Villages, then the effect on local streets would be to add 116 vehicles per day to existing volumes. If that traffic split 50 — 50 north- and southbound on Village Avenue, then there would be an additional daily traffic increase of 58 vehicles on each of those street segments. This is not a large amount of traffic— perhaps one vehicle every four minutes during peak hours — and it is well within the network's safe operating capacity. However, it remains to be seen whether from a policy perspective further measures to reduce or soften impacts are required. These could include: 1. Installation at developer's expense of speed humps on Suffolk Drive and Village Drive in both neighborhoods to slow the speed of existing and future traffic, so that improved safety offsets increased numbers. -32- 2. Restrict or minimize access to Suffolk Drive until such time as the signal is installed. This could take the form of connecting building area 6 to building areas 3, 4 and 5 by crossing the wash as a temporary means of access, and creating a separate Oracle Road entry for building areas 7 and 8. Neither of these measures are likely to be supported by ADOT. 3. Training employees and customers to exit by turning right onto Oracle and then making a "U" turn at the shopping center. This could be reinforced by painting turn arrows on the pavement and by signing the entrance to the subdivision to prohibit through traffic. 5. No separate bicycle or pedestrian pathways are proposed within the development parcels. 6. There are no on-site roads, only driveways and PAALs. II L. SEWERS 1. All parcels will be served by public sewer which is existing adjacent to the sites. No off-site easements or rights-of-way need by obtained. It is believed that sewer conveyance capacity is available. 2. No new collection sewers are proposed. 3. No sewers are proposed to be located in natural areas or along washes. II M. WATER 1. The property is served by Tucson Water. -33- 4, • AI 1 I '- .I I T U C S O N INVESTING IN OUR COMMUNITY I I I I ' I I Tucson Water Department November 25, 1998 Don Laidlaw & Associates Attn.: Donald H. Laidlaw, AICP 1735 E. Fort Lowell, Suite 10 Tucson,AZ 85719 SUBJECT: Property Adjacent to Suffolf Hills Sec. 36,T.12S., R.13E. WATER SUPPLY Tucson Water has been designated by the State of Arizona, Department of Water Resources, as having an assured water supply. This does not mean that water service is currently available to the proposed development. This development lies within the exterior boundary of Tucson Water's planned 50-year service area. Therefore, water supply is assured. WATER SERVICE The approval of water meter applications is subject to the availability of water service at the time an application is made. The developer shall be required to submit a water master plan identifying water use, fire flow requirements and all major on-site and off-site water facilities and the proposed connection points to the existing water system. Any Specific Area Plan Fees, Protected Main Fees, and/or other needed facilities' costs are to be paid by the developer. The comments herein made are valid for a period of one year only. If you have any questions, please call New Development at 791-4718. Sincerely, 7/1 Lawrence Mulhern System Evaluation Unit Supervisor cc: File(2) a:\ping\other\dlaid law2.doc EXHIBIT II-M WATER (520) 791-4718 • FAX (520) 791-5288 • P.O. BOX 27210 • TUCSON,AZ 85726-7210 s II N. SCHOOLS Not applicable. II O. RECREATION AND TRAILS 1. No recreation areas are proposed. 2. Natural and modified open space will be owned by individual lot owners, subject to natural open space easements and restrictions. II P. CULTURAL RESOURCES There are no known cultural resources on the property. If, during construction, materials that may be human remains and associated burial items are discovered, ground disturbing activities in the vicinity of the discovery will cease, the discovery site will be secured, and the Arizona State Museum will be immediately notified. II Q. AIR QUALITY This is not an industrial facility, therefore not applicable. II R. OTHER 1. Water harvesting is expected to be incidental. Stormwater retention requirements will result in substantial groundwater recharge. 2. It is not known if individual owners and architects will desire passive or active solar systems. -34- I 3. Other site amenities are not identified. 4. Other impacts are not identified. 5. Specifications for development adjacent to residentially zoned properties have been described above. -35- REFERENCES Landscaping with Native Arizona Plants, Natural Vegetation Committee, Arizona Chapter, Soil Conservation Society of American, The University of Arizona Press, 1973, 3rd Printing 1982. Biotic Communities of the American Southwest United States and Mexico. Desert Plants Volume 4, Brown, D.E., Number 1-4, 1982. The Critical and Sensitive Wildlife Habitat of Eastern Pima County Map and Report, Dr. Robert Shaw, August, 1986. The Pima County Trails System and Parks Map, Pima County Parks and Recreation, August, 1986. Pima County Major Streets and Scenic Routes Plan, Amended, 7/98. Pima County's Balanced and Critical Basin Map. Pima County Floodplain Mapping Service: Xeroriparian Habitat Map. Pima County Web Page: Traffic, Parcels, Mapping Laidlaw Consulting, L.L.C. t-51 e.5„,___, Land and r`.oturr roily Planning rt,,, i May 24, 1999 Mr. David Guyer, Senior Planner Pima County Development Services Planning Division 201 North Stone Tucson, Anzona 85701 Subject: Site Analysis for Co9-98-42/43 —Wong —Oracle Road Dear David: Thank you for your comments on the second draft of the Site Analysis. It was quite a surprise to be confronted with the Buffer Overlay Zone comments, which I have since discussed with Keith Hollinger. I'm amazed that no one, including myself, was aware of the BOZ requirements during the first review. The Site Analysis has been revised to include BOZ requirements (Part I) and design response to same (Part 2). The PDP is in full compliance with BOZ. As for Ted Payne's comments, corrections have been made to Part I Hydrology and Traffic sections. Regarding correcting the total trips stated on page 31, I would point out that I stated that the combined buildings 1 through 5 will attract 415 vehicles per day. Counting the 415 vehicles that then exit those properties, the total comes out to 830. Very tr y yours, Don d H. Laidlaw. AICP r,-. 17 ,,/,7,--3 7 7 7 7 9 ra ti . cc: Ted Payne M g 2c jogq d.) 17.3' ta i fi►r; : 'c t;'if. iulre fa Tucson. Arizona 85 7!y 20-_? 7 7-5 1'. .' r -i 1 _i'0'327-$175 ØEVELOPMENT SERVICES<<_: P ,� D E PARTM EN T 0 -,i��. - c201 N. STONE AVENUE, 1ST FLOOR TUCSON, AZ 85701 tr 4 t4` P PHONE: 740-6800 FAX 623-5411 co 0, s'1:- - RECEIPT -- \s.,' iteR PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA ***************************************************************************.* ACTIVITY P99PL00260 FEES RECEIPT # 99P00268 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: TAX CODE: DATE: 05/24/1999 TIME: 15:49 COMP TYPE: NON-PERMIT PL RECEIPT APPLICATION PE: DESCRIPTION OF WORK: SITE ANALYSIS RESUB CO9-98-42/ APPLICANT: LAIDLAW CONSULTING LLC OWNER: **************************************************************************** PAID BY: CHECK NOTATION: 1950 MISC SPECIAL ZON ACTIONS 66.00 TOTAL THIS PAYMENT $66.00 -/ _'- CASE NUMBER : C09-98-43 P&Z PLANNING / ZONING DEPARTMENT Page 1 of 4 CASE NAME : Wong-Oracle Road LISTING OF SELECTED PARCELS Total records : 16 NOTIFICATION DISTANCE : 300 / TAXPAYERS NAME AND ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION 5;14-4'61-reA-' PARCEL CODE : 225500020 TUCSON ORO ENTRADA PARTNERSHIP IRR PTN OF S268'OF N827.97'OF E675'OF W945.66' LANDCLASS : 1436 % ENTRADA DE ORO PLAZA OF NW4 NW4 LYG W OF TUC-FLORENCE HWY 3.67 AC LANDRATIO : 23.50 1700 S EL CAMINO REAL#404 SEC 36-12-13 IMP CLASS : 1436 SAN MATEO CA (5930/629 6194/791 6295/809-815 10874/ IMP RATIO : 23.50 944020000 (FOR 203-63-002K)1149, 1154) PROP ADDR : 7951 ORACLE RD PARCEL CODE : 22551011A WONG WALTER&WONG JANE TRUSTEES SUFFOLK HILLS N150'OF BLK B EXC SWLY COR THEREOF LANDCLASS : 0040 ;, 5437 E 3RD (RD 5995/1062) LANDRATIO : 16.00 �1$ TUCSON AZ i IMP CLASS : 0000 I0,4 IMP RATIO : 0.00 A 857110000 (FORMERLY 203-63-011A) PROP ADDR : PARCEL CODE : 22551012A FISHER BERNARD&THERESA SUFFOLK HILLS S155'OF N305'OF BLK B EXC PCL IN LANDCLASS : 0040 17323 ST ANDREWS DR NWLY PTN THEREOF LANDRATIO : 16.00 POWAY CA (RD 5982/577) IMP CLASS : 00 (10978/257) IMP RATIO : 0.00 920640000 (FORMERLY 203-63-012A) PROP ADDR : PARCEL CODE : 225510130 CHF ENTERPRISES SUFFOLK HILLS S 150' OF N 455'OF BLK B LANDCLASS : 1543 % FOSTER&FOSTER ENTR (DEED: DKT 6538 PGS 1559 1563& 1565 5-27-81) LANDRATIO : 19.60 IMP CLASS : 1530 IMP RATIO : 25.00 000000000 (FORMERLY 203-63-0130) PROP ADDR : 7780 ORACLE RD PARCEL CODE : 225510140 NUNN JAMES E&MARJORIE L SUFFOLK HILLS S 105'OF N 560'OF ELK B LANDCLASS : 2134 7770 N ORACLE RD LANDRATIO : 18.30 TUCSON AZ IMP CLASS : 2130 IMP RATIO : 25.00 857040000 (FORMERLY 203-63-0140) PROP ADDR : 7770 ORACLE RD J/44/77 CASE NUMBER : C09-98-43 P&Z PLANNING / ZONING DEPARTMENT Page 2 of 4 CASE NAME : Wong-Oracle Road LISTING OF SELECTED PARCELS Total records : 16 NOTIFICATION DISTANCE : 300 TAXPAYERS NAME AND ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL CODE : 225510490 MAC DONALD WILLIAM W&GIBBONS EVELYN M SUFFOLK HILLS LOT 29 LANDCLASS : 0150 JT/RS LANDRATIO : 10.00 7769 N ARUNDEL CT IMP CLASS : 0150 TUCSON AZ IMP RATIO : 10.00 857040000 (FORMERLY 203-63-0490) PROP ADDR : 7769 ARUNDEL CT PARCEL CODE : 225510500 JURECKY MARIA T SUFFOLK HILLS LOT 30 LANDCLASS : 0150 7783 N ARUNDEL CT LANDRATIO : 10.00 TUCSON AZ IMP CLASS : 0150 IMP RATIO : 10.00 857040000 (FORMERLY 203-63-0500) PROP ADDR : 7783 ARUNDEL CT PARCEL CODE : 22551051A SCHWEIGERT MARLIN J&KAREN J JT/RS SUFFOLK HILLS LOT 31 EXC TRI PTN OF THE SE COR LANDCLASS : 0150 7770 N ARUNDEL CT LANDRATIO : 10.00 TUCSON AZ IMP CLASS : 0150 IMP RATIO : 10.00 857040000 (FORMERLY 203-63-051A) PROP ADDR : 7770 ARUNDEL CT PARCEL CODE : 22551052A TOMPKINS IRENE S SUFFOLK HILLS LOT 32&TRI PCL IN SE COR OF LANDCLASS : 0150 7760 N ARUNDEL CT LOT 31 LANDRATIO : 10.00 TUCSON AZ (TERM: DKT 6613 PG 312 9-11-81) IMP CLASS : 0150 IMP RATIO : 10.00 857040000 (FORMERLY 203-63-052A) PROP ADDR : 7760 ARUNDEL CT PARCEL CODE : 225510560 PASBORG DENNIS J&MARY E JT/RS SUFFOLK HILLS LOT 36 LANDCLASS : 0150 7841 N VILLAGE AVE LANDRATIO : 10.00 TUCSON AZ IMP CLASS : 0150 IMP RATIO : 10.00 857040000 (FORMERLY 203-63-0560) PROP ADDR : 7841 VILLAGE AV J/G-t/7 7 CASE NUMBER : CO9-98-43 P&Z PLANNING / ZONING DEPARTMENT Page 3 of 4 CASE NAME : Wong-Oracle Road LISTING OF SELECTED PARCELS Total records : 16 NOTIFICATION DISTANCE : 300 TAXPAYERS NAME AND ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL CODE : 225510570 ROGALSKY ALBERT S&EVELYN V TR SUFFOLK HILLS LOT 37 LANDCLASS : 0150 7853 N VILLAGE AVE (QCD: 9613/721) LANDRATIO : 10.00 TUCSON AZ IMP CLASS : 0150 IMP RATIO : 10.00 857040000 (FORMERLY 203-63-0570) PROP ADDR : 7853 VILLAGE AV PARCEL CODE : 225512140 ESCONDIDA, L. L. C. ESCONDIDO PLAZA LOT 1 LANDCLASS : 1430 ATTN: VENTURE WEST INC LANDRATIO : 25.00 6007 E GRANT RD IMP CLASS : 1430 TUCSON AZ IMP RATIO : 25.00 857122316 (FORMERLY 203-63-2140) PROP ADDR : 7850 ORACLE RD(7854-7974) PARCEL CODE : 225512150 EL GANADO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ESCONDIDO PLAZA LOT 2 LANDCLASS : 1830 ATT: WESTERN TIRE CENTER LANDRATIO : 25.00 3545 S RICHEY BLVD IMP CLASS : 1830 TUCSON AZ IMP RATIO : 25.00 857130000 (FORMERLY 203-63-2150) PROP ADDR : 7846 ORACLE RD PARCEL CODE : 225512160 CHURCH'S FRIED CHICKEN ESCONDIDO PLAZA LOT 3 LANDCLASS : 2030 PO BOX BH001 LANDRATIO : 25.00 SAN ANTONIO TX IMP CLASS : 2030 IMP RATIO : 25.00 782840000 (FORMERLY 203-63-2160) PROP ADDR : 7848 ORACLE RD PARCEL CODE : 225513830 FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE AGENCY TR 10822 ORACLE VILLAGE LOT 0001 LANDCLASS : 0040 ATTN: WATSON CHEVROLET INCO (10575/1485 10575/1518) LANDRATIO : 16.00 PO BOX 78180 IMP CLASS : 00 TUCSON AZ IMP RATIO : 0.00 857030000 PROP ADDR : 7/L't/77 CASE NUMBER : CO9-98-43 P&Z PLANNING / ZONING DEPARTMENT Page 4 of 4 CASE NAME : Wong-Oracle Road LISTING OF SELECTED PARCELS Total records : 16 NOTIFICATION DISTANCE : 300 TAXPAYERS NAME AND ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL CODE : 225513840 FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE AGENCY TR 10822 ORACLE VILLAGE LOT 0002 LANDCLASS : 0040 ATTN: WATSON CHEVROLET INC (10575/1485,1518) LANDRATIO : 16.00 PO BOX 78180 IMP CLASS : 00 TUCSON AZ IMP RATIO : 0.00 857030000 PROP ADDR : ) J (/ i. r'".f. 43 }•', ~ 46 47 46 R \ 7 54 i ,r+'! 9 c B .., 1 . 7::: 4 2,,,.‘0,2fr*".. `: ° R .1 - ::• R1 ..-..-r.r. �FA .. .._�::-�' .�. � MOrITECELLO COU R CB 4 3 9... 62 63 6 ...-...-...-.-_-.-...:.:.: ..••. ...• ....... • .... •••. • .._ . 3 1 ligir 67 \- :, FLOOE� .,• 0 ` 3 7 9 �_ CO _i>...ct 4'•V••.-.'.10....l..,..i'.,7..f...1 1..e..1:.-b13-...V1.-....-........ . -1c1) .4g so-d 1.0 -- --- :. - 1EaftN.... 6. .".3.'.".'.. r ` LSE' 1 , ..•:''',. : :,„. ip gco ,—, s off, ;tr... Aiiiill \ 011.44-* a P e6 li 111 SR •-., 0,,.. d.1 Wis .----- sl I 1 5 ::'"..:: T R •' , .. . . ..........................T....:-...............4 T,..-7 ,•MAN ,4 i,. ,,, t011;CI i .1 i $ 20%%% 4 la . 101 102 � 100 99 :...:.. - i I - I3 I e I A II,A 4 RIVE a5' - • I� �� I 74 B / 2 24 • • O YU CA 74A 12 . . ICO YR I 4 . .. 10 51 -• 9 _ _ 31 I� 7 1 iii, 6 :4- ' P 5 60 �/ 4 T C.T III t.// .. „...,.: '.....- ......,..._ IK A _ - = - 7 1, w —1IM59C L .....2.___....................................___................, . 58B 700 =: I ��P I H a33- 1 6 J\ ` �26 2 72A . 414 • 2 2 Q�NO O ► k �w T R os iq. ,ir it't 047 I3I F ,sa- .EXp _J Ie I-CID M.IIMIlii — z_ 14 2�0. 15D 15C � c�P� 50 rt 1 33 44 R• A 58 I 14 • • • •n J 'o" j+ • ' ' 1 SUBJECT TO PIMA CO . , nR ,r, s' -.. CODE:15.12.040 (ARE/ f , EE SIIEET t I 0 0 l i / 0.1 r im . 'ilmla liv-'4149aia iiiitiTimiimit*Orti7"--‘im miiti lim No 1 / : /1 .t.9 : -;3 I ! in'/ . kr` N 04 kk I/ c) • , ,.F? . r ,. .. 0 ot::,:•. I _ 1r f IcS) CP\PN-* 3 i f,' - f300K't•.)*PA at-- I cArALINA CITRUS EST/,TES U AS RECORDED IN 6 APS"'ruts d.PAGE 24 ON JUNE 1,1951 • WE um_'.0 r Menerr 57e4/1. T 'e0•-:�� 60UNaleY OF 5U60/V/5/01V C v e 4) serf-W CL1{C QIi�[ ;/ „ n ♦ -�) aas a•err Ara rbsr 80�0—N IW'k M.4GEE O RCADE p^8 0 — NNCA''..9EG86 o '► 6ao.oe ..... N < Y....../isG.77 A.Nw car. ia.c!'..�.... -- --- —'— ._" .... 31t f?' _ > _ SK. PNO 7‘,. I H I9•ie'!s`!. /s77.10' JCG.Lt! fl.... -— .:.. __ /RON//N I I n -_ i> }1 O T%Is.N- 1 poii !I ... 1 8g • �,i •• V o.1' S i 0 rim 0,..',.. 0 tir . : 6 ,.. NU "be • N,.. `+\ ,o.sa i LoerTww PLAN �, S eptOnn 3G,T.-12-3.,R.-13-E. IP�^...Ceu•.+ Awe:ow. 93 8 He++o s....r 4 SEE RESUB °; 42 :�' IllBK. 15 PG. 20 ' �,,.K,«w I,ti, DEDICATION c' �•u CEOk. 0000009;Fi: / ` .,Mx Lend Tef,4904 and Trust Canonry,A S'44.,1,Coaga vhon,as trustee (,) V' e.der Ti`ase Agrevnw/ImN•311i-rs6led Apr//9,HSE. 1. o 47• /y, 36 b.Wilkie. l:es/dent wl 4• I(L Stole of Arizona SS •sbt es•,y }• Co my of/awes f •� sf,ri' LT Ilea r6,e ye ny,nstrernenl.w•xrno.uledged befys ny this_14. 8 I day of . 7.1. 715E by.hhn 5 ry'"e, ire Rssadent of oo. ` 37_ g I tht A,nect [and,7t/s,and Trust Compa7y,ebr the purposes here/n ' I confo,iaed hr..\1fr. • . '. k f.l•.,- .i sLt[r �� �f_>' ie..ae' (� .y /e • 'g My coot'',ss,on espiees;L-il-2.o see sHier N°2 ` 36 0 '' et,,of Ar,zono15s Ea•-�/� • I ^ County of P aac f ,y . CUkVE DATA RETURNS >t \se. filed for r..nord of the rrquast of P AN7aN+CC,l-L CURVC N• CEue hApti l.A- EMI-VN tIMS rN .( BooK of Mops and Pats of Paes-a—Meraaf ` a re�enfs?drh ri eose.neeAs rh,s�day eF Tit L.r fuse T.n,e, 1I/ At 7v' 22'51" ?Soo' 10E/' 547/' �r-_ I NNN H 2 ,a0.21'fC 2500' SO.01' IseS' �L �L<>l ifi y e,• i 0'eY 2f ad 26L7' i!.27' fs evsgnenh 76rdravisoyreayLl elrMrf am Pins Camay',,Pacordar I eI"s8',s' ?ioo'�i2 r, !c»'— �rr� hnils,aMes Iran pets,and eo,rrxaa;Ay recnrori s By .�la->,,et.(;..•.," ',ply i I/• 24'is• so.co'1^( Jre l7 34 se 7 2•«' G• SAloe/1 OD 221ii' K APPROVALS I /r e 7,I3' is oo' 20a' if 71' ��iaa COUNTY4 ENlINEER 09 �B MAP 116 co✓N/y L'NC./NEE�R J rE ZONE C R-I,SR, Ce/RVE DATA•GEM"E chve P�OARO OF SUPERVISORS H.D.Z.— 11 T R CrnlvL'N• CCN r1Qea ANGLE,Go/us 5C41/-7AN LEAD IN 1 Elsa Hanna,C/ark o fthe.5a7/d ofSSFrrv,sose,here a' 6sa N' si./' /e1OS by Cl/'tify char 20•a,f /2^ ao•07'.o• 180.40' 84/!• ,ee 67. efs/zot n,.,a op/ptnert;dYy F t ee d_ syeen4B of P/00 County,Stale ! 21•p'N' 100.00' K8.' 390.07' K c+•:2 m• v2.r ,IiM 25c10 FLOOD PLAIN APPROVAL REQUIRED s ,e•"or foe soo.od slat' up s,• y-.- y`v-o,1' FOR LOTS• pir?II-I3 16-24 30-32 35-37 K---—/TM'-i1' 49000.1 -le 6s' Nia1 CLERK,Sa,1RC OP s✓eeRVrso.es Ci17E • —is ,o• /c'I,' 77ovo'— 36.28' ii f'✓ ' F ///''+�� N ,a•00'ea` 500c0' 12.74' 8717' '• K N I •L CERTIFICATION OF SURVEY LOTS ITHRU44,LOTS-IA IhrbLOGKS-A/I3 . rh,s,.,to certify that the serve,oila's f5►`„I& A SUWiVI5IO/ Of papas!,,ae/Ed/rsp a/,'/ot cwxrs os show n 4, th/s p✓ot ores cane/etre,under mydrecAo* NOTES A PORTION OF THE4.€S N.W I/4 OF SECTION 3‘ f x./955 -... a Represents Sr,pan se whrss otherrwse noted -12"Sat R-13`E., -R.P�piT.PIMA . Represents ys'Coed awed Aloe COUNTY ARIZCWA, LYING EAST OF �L¢'6•�= �• i. ' ,- . '1 ® Represents a curve See e.•rr'r ebb es / a, rmd lord S veyc.. ,.. /Seiariiigs:4040.1 ore Lased organ ate•bearing of the a}.f lines of THE TUCSON-FLORENCE HIGHWAY f.' Noe NE re of Section DEL.T•/2-5,R 4 5..,a SRd/M,RAY COL.ey, // Ar/zdw.as beinf NO`00'II'E es shown on the'tat of Cabo CoM/iw Was in r5onk/2 of Maps wad"Al.,of pnye 27 therm''' 57-345 F b.84,PAGES I TWO 20 SHEET-I OF 2 ,� �► BOOK/3 PAGE 9B BUOK_L—YAGt-Is' ° 1 ..IN 1 /1 0 SEE SHEET N°I j 39 IAlt O t i2,4.1::, i 1 -_•.rir.. Y i.w e.' al c{• SW sx xxe,.• r; 1a. ..t 3G ,e, w ,f �—�--- 1 Q • �- 5. 1 � -1 ... ,. r - S R `: ��„;____..., I '. \ �.,a,.�6. 1 —3 i• �z ®. •� \ , ,xxeo' W , ro' 'y \ ° 30 . : sa 34 l 7800- N. 'j FOR DEVELOPMENT I •Zo. •6� •o•,-, 32 �.\ � 1 DETAILS (4) SEE '1• ©`''\ 33 0 "` . Z •'j li D.P. BK.2 PG.56 i' 29 ;©'t.� ° ® „O �'; VTR . © • ..., nt . o : i1 ---� 1 x•51 0;•../ ® %1 ,.. 14,T-�'woos,.. .1:ee c• „r : j r1-- 1 /-/�c ©1l ,. ® N �/ SR 6 EM1 s�sff,/' /4 tki I- - ...La ,^ 27 • , 721.1I ,� W 4/ a SEE D.P. BK.5 (6) PG.II ;;• I •.fie i- /:'II p ® /5 .- —t Q 'a PLDC1I' B * 1' •3ssx, .0' . i - ~'° 2G `IQ 6� IS• ® -----n.1•Ie.11., i0, °34 i°!.f/ dPG'Y O --- - - I N'pD- /` I _'''s''-,—_.w se� .w se.— -''so'_l r5,-..V.8—r-- �rP- 25 • t cR .I_i \ V 1 I r- ,▪ °, 8 1 t o 1 •.� 77`00- N. S R 1 --1 /� �7700-N. ll t 1 8 1/ was-• mil; g s�— .V. • • • E• 2/ z x � 1 alp � �, .- ..&Z:`' I �� /Q �;lo , ' �� •. 22 7o OI 1 O OI . '''.' — • i • —., /44.13. 0'T° I e j Q 24 Z ® •°° A �,. OR/vE "-�y 114,E a1� ,Z .c e.•.e•w•.. lit M• It • I 1 1 ® •1'ie�xY/ ♦K I in I i 1 O1 , O I O° 504.5e47fa' 1 ./,5'w...i .x 1 1 r® CDi iCD 99 I I 3q S[ 9 0 ...L4Grii— .i—�* N 'o- ® 11 I I g i 1 1 � 0 2 Da 1 W E ?!i5 2D1 adr 42:1) .o i o I i I 1 0 $ P, /'� g /-g 8 I / .. 2 °.. I I I 1�8 8 7G01 •g ° °p' p; :oa R I t" I I ^�----I, JJLThJL 7600-N - - - �b-�,„- 7600— N1 —90' " ver ,rxeo• ,r:,e' `� cm SEC.Sc i fND/"LEAD Cie neE CATALINA 1/ILLAGE N° 2 I CATALINA VII,LAGE N° 3 AS RECogOED IN hOGK 9,(AGE 71,A/Af5 f'M'MATS I A5 RECORDED IN 6GCaC 10,PA.4E 26,AM'S f FLATS OIN OCT.'23,195, 1 ON AtARCN 30,1963 1 0 SUFFOLK HILLS 0 1 IIb 0 0 0 PSLOCKS A/PS N SHEET 2 OF 2 'y,-,Q ROOK/3 PAGE_J . Y �-- - . s s AREA-CODE 225 -5C 1008 -513 EAST 5c FORMERLY 203-63 -- -64 —65 IIAG J 200.67'� 45' ` m CV < n OZC O O �D ; ti Iz 225.66' 0 m N 334 6i IET4 0 J 5' 50' o 0 0 45' .1n Cu W DETAIL ' ) Z P i/7Q county QSSPSSO/' 1998-1 :\T12S\R13E\S36- 08/28/97 DML y88 SOCX 11 50.14M 059 91..Y. y88 2001C ii 5'.d&8 065 91.Y. CCS0 300 600 900 1200 FEET - - 1 f�r� �i " C 225 - 51 suf'_ ,erz4A,T, ffoltV PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT JUDITH PATRICK PLANNING DIVISION PH (520)740-6800 DIRECTOR 201 N.STONE AVENUE FAX (520)623-5411 25 May 1999 TUCSON,ARIZONA 85701-1207 Mr. Don Laidlaw Laidlaw Consulting,L.L.C. 1735 East Fort Lowell Road, Suite 10 Tucson,AZ 85719 Re: Site Analysis for Co9-98-42/43 WONG - ORACLE ROAD REZONING (THIRD DRAFT) Dear Mr. Laidlaw, Staff has found the site analysis for the above case to be COMPLETE. Twenty-three (23) copies of the final version of the document should be submitted to this office no later than Friday, 18 June 1999 at 5:00 p.m. This rezoning request is tentatively scheduled to go before the Planning and Zoning Commission 30 June 1999. As you are aware the Pima County Zoning Code requires you to notify this office 30 days in advance of the hearing of your intent to hold a meeting with affected property owners, where an "adequate" (complete) site analysis must be available for examination. Because of the Memorial Day Holiday, the required letter must be in this office no later than Friday,28 May at 5:00 p.m. to meet the required deadline. While the site analysis is complete and may be presented to the Design Review Committee (DRC) as such, I am not sure how enthusiastic the Committee will be about the proposal on page 18 where you state ". . . and 50 percent is proposed to be left natural and/or enhanced through supplemental planting". "Natural" and"enhanced" do not generally mean the same thing, and the Buffer Overlay Ordinance specifically states "natural". Finally,any changes proposed by the DRC should be accommodated in the site analysis before its final resubmittal. Please contact me should you have any questions about this site analysis review. Very truly yours, 41 (Vti (IrTh David Guyer Senior Planner Laidlaw Consulting, L.L.C. Community Planning = '\!) Land and Com y May 27, 1999 Dear Neighboring Property Owners: In November and December, 1998, meetings were held with adjoining residents and the Suffolk Hills Neighborhood Association regarding a proposal to rezone certain properties along Oracle Road to TR, as shown on the attached map. Use would be limited to professional and business offices in accordance with the preliminary development plan's design and development standards, enclosed. A record of those meetings is also attached. Due to a number of regrettable delays, during which time portions of the plan have been revised extensively, no further contact has been made until now. The rezoning matter is scheduled to be heard by the Pima County Planning and Zoning Commission on June 30, 1999, and we wish to have a final opportunity to review with you the planning and development concept and to answer any questions you might have. Accordingly, we have reserved the Fellowship Hall at the Lutheran Church of the Ascension from 7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. on Tuesday, June 22, 1999. I to rward to seeing you there. Very tru y Donald . Laidlaw, AICP Oat% ra RECEIVED r^- MAY 2 7 s1g9 Enclosures ` • 01 1735 East Fort Lowell, Suite 10, Tucson, Arizona 857/9 520/312-5339 FAX 520/312-9/75 ins a r1411 1 kilillo a pV.- , Tir ri I i m il Mr i li /744; el kee MI 1137 Mr 4 11, 0 .• � i , W T WR1Mp 4111.: 1:3::;1111r4441Y • •o{ Ia 4101:En IlifirAll,.. .. ....ie. CP, i vii, 5.00.,0.1 D :•u 4 �N R •• �♦ i j s. Care... o• ,p© N `. , V �.. 1J 1A . IQ3 i l:ma1e,0 l0'"..., ° tfia S. .may ■, . i s• •M` ` 1 ~ , Y.GYNY •403 �• ,. I4aI 0 ___i 01111' M •Y 111•1•• to 1. •1 . 4. 4 1.0110,/1111114 I1 114" \.*\"Oa7 . .. z TR ® ...C.� .ate VI' ' j . • . . .s.o . " -.0 b I•• �Y YO ••++ TR er• ■6� Y O ..:.:.0 41 .. 1 •'1 s!._r•n ti• • O • J ` .� N• © f.•`dr 1 Y 1 �� a•• ---�- - 1 _ TR r7 r1 M w III , • _ • - tt •a 1 t, r �' .• a. v iiic J 011'.7-111114 . \ r _ r i • + / C8- 2 ' �' SR • w w alar , •• 'O rr • r• •ro• • _1' .r•• ro MI•. N M N M M • a• _, ,• • MM • K I r» 1 ROAD it 'M 2,T a4AGEE TA R0 ""r_ Sew ...1 MI F. froc.....„. 5 •• •a N M •L • ,-----:-. . /0,i .A. ,. '" f,,.,.. •' CB-1 _ SR to 1 ., CR-5 b - - 1-'1 r. �.� • , •i ,1.140 .s, /14 (f Vim- 0. _ ",C 1 i W0 t 7�RIOSIXi Ho i I•' I,, 4- ••a 7 A7 anummorolorlr'l , /,• ,1 • I C B-I .. �•At _i____,' i . op, ., oggieglkik - ili ,,,,, O[S,[.t+TO * \ { C :111115:\ rat , cp.TR0 1 .." ! I Ilk ga I el \-\- / ,ivilstg.S0•4 CU. it 1I r O ]VI/• 1111 Or WIL ••. ._, rs •_[ 7., -11110131r. M '.. ,_ I i --...--.-.- t1 V ( .0140 \ 1 ofHCRi 'k--`2.-.'\.''.• t r • • �. CR-1 .. \ •• �e- (5 .f~i f •r` r{ !/�f v' ^ter CO •'mimes, ••• • \ , ,,"-:.) ,�O. . _C. .• ___ s„.,...01 rio r keEt- Ile 1 1? ni -"").<":".:Ir\if .":it4 ...... , 0 wo., „ + niev. t ,..•4b_. Am lore'g Ay..t•d 2T el T Tp vY/A • DNlNG MAP aJpEIS120O(A A Al y � 11- .01, of tiro. 154i.-,7,At*(•a Zmutttx lowing Maas 4ntiMd by B$•n 12i3 / ` _,ppRftECTEQ TO za Oct Dt' t 0 BOO ` ' Soo VI . 4Q 110 wt 1 • • C0.4.BUILDING s e asrrwL r '1--- ngp,44 IiII1 ___ w.BUILDING ' 2S95 CONCRETE CUR.."%iiwik........jujr-pli' .4.;,. wilsii‘filifitili* , (O-N ►OR EET 0 E�►►sQ.24 F. ((� _ 4.,,,,,„ , _tong, ._ 0 tio......20.,-„._ 6, %.„,,mall li... , . . . _ it 11 -4010 .,,,...._ ,. , . .: . ..:. kip. ,; cc7 .4 ----- 11 '--. 7 It *Us MI 1- 1° --titlitit40: -. "----> ILJj- cclauLV:Tx 'All& f.,-r? titelaRreggrelIVIVitir-WaajOV 164 3V o —-- 4 Am AO eEFZfia,..___.......--- .... ..-414-...411.A.,4717e, ...--'1......;::,,0/11 ecc .f, 477- N—AripM. ''.__ " --- . ., c._ cr •,..,i _______.„ i 0,,,,,, .. i , / _,__ ,, , ,, ,i,___., ,, ALL LANDSCAPING WILL BE XERISCAPE 4-:-i-c- 1 ci---.---„, ..,,. , ....._ ---- _."./ , ,.,, , ... -..<._,7:,.\\ "'. ,t,<< ,........_, . 4 / 'Zrin r \g‘i ) i • ti-4 " , FL.4‘ Q? JTT ~ . EXHIBIT Il-B. 1 (N) PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN, NORTH " Scale: 1" = goo' BUTTERFIELD CROSSING A 1' Contour Intervals . DL€A / f Y I COWL OUILD010 1 / sun_oD r -— \ 1-Z1-15i----,-• _0_or ' / , . /.. . ... / it• .. ..._ .., :-. ,,,,,,.‘, : , \ `.„41$PHALT •S.'s /( . ,ii,:I 11 s ' I\ y -:,r. cy , A. vf --- I;. - j' . • ' ,t�wi 1, / f i i ••; :1 ` jr r e�. • • I i'"4', is iiit�' ` j jl ; 1 `_ _ •• .:� �.. ." ;7 ' S \ / ' ./Y 1 1 .6 `` ( ) 1 / 3 A/X'. )----c:k4(1)/.. 1 i .... • emir. 4 . ' ' N 1600 ,IPIRI... ... f \ N1.1• ,-- / , , •, FIC •, /- - ` / 10/ • , . r 5 -^ 1 • 'Cr i, ) -ii, .--•' ' /-4,A L._Pao. , . . A CC 1 6 ... I 1r 419: /. - ,'" . • 4.1 t Po os cr 1 :� -.112 si , .� •1-:‘� 1 IX • 0 / 2 • . •'ZJ6/5:: .•6.. He 2 • ,.'�.'t Jam' •`' 1 9 `_/,- 1 S J I" rss1.61 h aPA�r. /LXI- 1 i 26525. '- • ! .l •• ^� �� - c>w ': . 1--- ,:cr BUILD GAR - 1�' //'/! - ,sf ( ) ( - 1 1 1ST0 ,20 FT..I�`- ii. . Ks.. / .4.1.1r • 3 T 2HC426 I .W ; ! r 1 // (/ U ��1 22 SPACERS ' ( I��I�-`�~�� . 1 • :: rcirrio-x-:':•". ; " 1 t is • zss<i�, ooCu7 s4oa r.lOst _ )Th •'o • • • / 1 / /, • • i. �� 71ANCEO.pf1 i. •` � / /`• 295 a,4r V / • / 556 \____---- SUFFOCK QR s a nu, 266•.9 l p iI ( I • • J\\ m ` - may, �. 1 .3 • l l., +y; ,; \ •Esc `,1 )\ ` >f� .. go, ig 6 ; 2 Hc. . • 7:41.. ---- - r. ___.a..____ ----1K---e-z-i_. __It. j 1\s'-'-'. --i. 11 I • -.\ 1'. . ' ' I� 1 1 1 °t .� ._ I g. it <• '\ 1 _\' j 1 8� ril�� z, k ; .� f 1 1 'BUILDING-AREA I 1 • ILDING AREA- _- (- ';! `��:% • (:. , ;(' i I `2-STORY,24 FEET _ I 1 STORY;211,FT... \ ., ••ii ,; `'\,a- •-"-.1�-., f ,.,zoo SQ.Fr. —_.1 �...� ..Fr._�. 1 4 i l , 7131/46 , . ---- . .,.._-.......---j—---.--- 4. ..._ ,.......„7,,,,e_ ._- _ 7...,. . I. p ..¶ 27T1TL / ME. -f _� ,(_1,...„ 9Q 1/ .111P i. __ Li _ '��. �:—''1• ? ¢r�• r___ ,,,f \ . s i , , ..._ -,- ,.,6„. ___, _ .• . . I.:I.;i cs . ALL LANDSCAPING WILL BE XERISCAPE EXH • 94 •. , PRELIMINARY DEVELO 'MEN " Scale: 1" _ 100' PLAN, SOUTF A 1' Contour Intervals . n1 PIABUTTERFIELD CROSSIN( Date: June 7, 1999 - Staff Report Prepared By: Co9-98-43, Wong - Oracle Road Rezoning TRANSPORTATION REPORT: The property proposed for rezoning is served directly by Oracle Road (Florence Highway) between Ina Road and Magee Road. Oracle Road is a paved, six-lane divided State Highway with an existing right-of-way of 200 feet. Also, It is a designated scenic route. Current traffic consists of approximately 36, 600 Average Daily Trips (ADT) and the current roadway capacity is approximately 52 , 000 ADT. The proposed project will generate approximately 225 ADT based on general office uses. The petitioner proposes one access point to Oracle Road. 6. If this proposed rezoning case is approved, the Department of Transportation recommends the following special requirements. A. Provision of all necessary access improvements to Oracle Road as determined by the Arizona Department of Transportation. These improvements shall need the approval of the Arizona Department of Transportation and meet the appropriate standards prior to the approval of -' any development plan or subdivision plat for any portion of the subject property. B. Written certification from the Arizona Department of Transportation stating satisfactory compliance of all its requirements including approval of the number, the r location and the design of all access points to the subject property from Oracle Highway shall be submitted to the Pima County Development Services Department prior to the issuance of any building permits. FLOOD CONTROL REPORT: The property proposed for rezoning consists of moderately sloping desert terrain with moderate to heavy desert vegetation. Drainage affecting the property consists mainly of on-site runoff and one minor wash. The wash traversing the property carries an estimated 100-year discharge of 1,228 cfs. This wash and associated vegetation are classified as Xeroriparian class C habitat. On-site drainage shall be routed through the development in the natural wash channel to existing exit points. The majority of the runoff from the wash enters a large box culvert under Oracle Road and then proceeds west. The remaining water is detained behind Oracle Road with some of the water diverted south in a constructed drainageway. The property is located in a designated critical basin and there are no Federally mapped floodplains. 7. If this proposed rezoning case is approved, the Flood Control District recommends the following special requirements. A. The property owner must dedicate all rights-of-way and/or grant flowage easements for drainage purposes to Pima County, as determined necessary by the Flood Control District during the plan review process. B. Drainage shall not be altered, disturbed or obstructed without the written approval of the Flood Control District. C. All internal drainage improvements and any external drainage improvements required to mitigate drainage impacts caused by the proposed development shall be constructed at no cost to Pima County. (0) MEMO RANDUM PUBLIC WORKS - DEVELOPMENT SERVICES zo� PLANNING DIVISION DATE: June 9, 1999 TO: DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEMBERS FROM: Greg L. Hagen, Senior Planner RE: Co20-99-54 Butterfield Crossing Co9-98-42/43 Requirements for Buffer Overlay Zone Review for Rezoning Tax codes: 225-51-011A,225-21-018A,225-51-0190,225-51-0200 Applicant: Donald Laidlaw Laidlaw Consulting,LLC 1735 E. Fort Lowell, Suite 10 Tucson,AZ 85719 phone: 322.5339 fax: 322.9175 I. BACKGROUND This project is made up of three units,the northern unit is 1.3 acres and the southern units have three parcels totaling 6.5 acres. The site is located on the east side of Oracle Road south of Magee Road and north of Suffolk Dr.,within the northwest quarter section of Section 36 Township 12 Range 13 East.The subject property is currently being rezoned to allow for business and professional offices. This case is being brought before the Design Review Committee (DRC) as all properties being rezoned within one mile of a public reserve are subject to the Buffer Overlay Zone (BOZ). II. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AUTHORITY The purpose of the DRC review is to evaluate project compliance with the performance standards of the Buffer Overlay Zone (Section 18.67.050 of the Zoning Code). The Buffer Overlay Zone requires such evaluation for rezonings located within one mile of a public preserve such as the Coronado National Forest. The Design Review Committee will review the adequate site analysis prior to the first planning and zoning commission public hearing on a rezoning. Section 18.67.070B-1 states: "The design review committee shall make a recommendation to the commission on the proposed design as it relates to the site in its natural state." Section 18.67.070B-2 states:"The design review committee shall not continue a review unless more information is needed which the petitioner cannot provide at that meeting." III. PROJECT CONFORMANCE The proposal will be in compliance with performance standards as specified in 18.67.050 Each performance standard required is listed and described. Following the requirement are staff comments on how the standard is addressed in the submitted documentation. The performance standards apply to that portion of the development site subject to the Buffer Overlay Zone. Building Color and Reflective Finish The standard requires that all exposed exterior walls and roofs of buildings(unless a roof is screened by a parapet wall extending at least three feet above the building), retaining walls, and accessory structures that are visible from outside the land parcel boundary,shall be earthtone in color and shall blend in with the natural setting. Colors shall not exceed a light-reflective value of 60 percent. Mechanical equipment shall be screened and painted to reduce visibility. Comments: Building elevations and color schemes are not yet included in the rezoning document. Staff recommends that this standard should be included in the rezoning conditions recommended to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Fences and Walls The standard restricts any fence or wall to a maximum of four feet in height unless used to enclose a private area(i.e.,private yard<1/2 acre,horse corral, dog kennel, swimming pool, spa)on a lot. It prohibits walls and fences for delineation of property boundaries and those that impede wildlife movement through natural open space from and to off-site locations. The use of barbed wire is restricted. Comments: There is no reference to fences or walls proposed.This question should be asked to the applicant for clarification and also included as a rezoning condition. Lighting External lighting is only allowed for safety, security, and identification. No high-pressure sodium or mercury vapor lights are permitted. The standard allows low-intensity, low profile lighting not to exceed 42 inches in height. There are some exceptions and specific restrictions for tennis courts and horse corrals. Comments: No lighting design nor lighting regulations were addressed in the site analysis. The requirements of these standards should be recommended as a rezoning condition. Nonresidential Parking Areas The standard requires that such parking lots be located and screened by vegetation so that visibility from the roadways and public preserves is minimized. Comments: The preliminary plans show landscaping along Oracle Road so the parking lot will be screened from the roadway. Setback from Public Preserve The standard prohibits structures and private driveways or roads within 300 feet of a public preserve. Comments: These parcels are further than 300 feet from Coronado National Forest,therefore,this standard is not applicable. Utilities The standard requires that newly or relocated aboveground utility lines shall be placed underground and that underground utilities shall be joint-trenched and,wherever possible,placed within the paved portion of a roadway. Upgrades and reinforcements to existing utilities are also restricted. Comments:There is no mention ofutility locations in the site analysis booklet.The applicant should covenant to place all new utilities underground and within the parking area access lanes (PAAL). Vegetation The standard restricts type of plant to be used in private and common areas as stated in the Board of Supervisor approved resolution#1988-151,(See attachment). The siting of improvements should minimize the disturbance of native trees, shrubs, or cacti. Where removal of this plant material cannot be avoided, all reasonable efforts shall be made to relocate this plant material in the buffer overlay zone. Thirty percent of the disturbed on-site plant material is required to be salvaged and a 3:1 mitigation ratio is required for those plants that cannot be salvaged. Comments: Before the issuance of any permits, a salvage plan for all viable native trees and cacti will be presented to Pima County Planning for review and approval. The plan will address salvage and relocation on site of all qualified plants that are within the disturbance area cannot be preserved in place. All newly introduced landscape plants on site should be selected from the approved list as in Pima County Resolution number 1988-151. Trails Access The standard requires that public access to trails identified in the Eastern Pima County Trail System Master Plan shall be provided. Comments: Not applicable as there are any trails within one mile. Wash Preservation The standard requires those washes with significant vegetation and habitat shall be preserved in their predevelopment state, with two exceptions. The first exception is for limited and conditional disturbance in association with roadway,utility and trail crossings,and the second is for limited and conditional construction impacts. Comments: There is one minor wash in the northern parcel that will be impacted by the proposed development.The disruption will be created by the proposed parking lot and PAAL on the northern parcel. The southern parcel has the buildings placed on either side of the natural drainage channels. Functional and Natural The standard requires that a minimum of 50%of the area site be designated as natural open space, and that it form an interconnected system.Natural open space is defined as an area of land essentially unimproved and not occupied by any structures or man-made impervious elements except pedestrian and non motorized access trails that is set aside,dedicated,or reserved by recorded plat or covenant running with the land for public or private enjoyment as a preservation or conservation area. Comments: There is a xeroriparian"C"habitat on the northern parcel. This wash will be impacted by the proposed parking lot and associated PAAL. The proposed development plan has set aside 50%natural open space on the northern and southern parcels. Visual Quality Standards This section provides standards for visually harmonious development. Development in areas identified within the site analysis as having high visual sensitivity must be harmonious with the landscape in terms of form, line, color, texture, and scale. Development in areas identified as medium visual sensitivity must remain subordinate to the existing landscape. Comments: The proposed structure is located within low visual sensitivity areas on the northern parcel. The proposed structures on the southern parcel have a medium-high visibility along Oracle Road and a low to low-medium visibility along the residential boundary.The buildings are two-story along Oracle Road frontage and one story along the residences. IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee approve the proposed site analysis/predevelopment plan for the rezoning case Co9-99-54 with the following conditions: 1. All exposed exterior walls and roofs of buildings (unless a roof is screened by a parapet wall extending at least three feet above the building),retaining walls, and accessory structures that are visible from outside the land parcel boundary,will be earthtone in color and will blend in with the natural setting.Colors will not exceed a light-reflective value of 60 percent.Mechanical equipment will be screened and painted to reduce visibility, as recommended by the standards. 2.No wall will be allowed that impedes wildlife movement through natural open space from and to off-site locations. 3.No high-pressure sodium or mercury vapor lights will be permitted. All external lighting will be low-intensity, low profile lighting not to exceed 42 inches. i1 Th a plican t�rT coyenan t(LS]�a IZI `-'Lit��Lt��Fr- ���rcrrnupdMia�nt()T�,z;i � he-parking 5. Before the issuance of any permits a salvage plan for all viable native trees and cacti will be presented to Pima County Planning for review and approval. The plan will address salvage and relocation on-site of all qualified plants that are within the disturbance area and cannot be preserved in place.All newly introduced on-site landscape should be selected from the approved list as in Pima County Resolution number 1988-151. Respectfully submitted, Greg L. Hagen Senior Planner c Frank Behlau Attch: 1. Chapter 18.67: Buffer Overlay Zone 2. Resolution# 1988-151: Buffer Overlay Zone Plant List CASE NUMBER Co9-98-43 CASE NAME WONG -ORACLE ROAD #2 REZONING STATE OF ARIZONA) ) § COUNTY OF PIMA) I, the undersigned,hereby certify that on JUNE 10, 1999 , I mailed and posted "Notice of Public Hearing" to be held by the: PIMA COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION on Wednesday, JUNE 30, 1999 , at 9:00 A.M. County/City Public Works Building 201 N. Stone Ave., Basement Level Room 'C' Tucson, Arizona. Notices were mailed to the property owner(s)listed on the notification list,applicant(s),the agent(s), and the neighborhood associations,unless otherwise noted, The subject site posted is located on the east side of Oracle Road, approximately 1/4 mile south of Magee Road. • Mail' POSTING:b44 SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS / ) day o , 1999 Notary Public: ,c__1_e...�e . d y..tilld n'Y"SY9FY:�'.e�d'='i'.flJ'ca.b'C�`I; ;,n`.� d1f.A6'�Cf:'!'5!.i,►J!' My Commission Expires: Acit,mp. Y \ter't'. 'fi RV'.fi/iiYSlr'^T :A` 4'.• L+'A.'•T -7- \--------- I PIMA COUNTY J ____ ____ Lri . , i_i CI3-1 - ? P121112 11213J6 I UFFOLK CENITE I ATALI NA CITRUS ESTATES SV , MA GEE ROAD '-: E1-2-1-335- , / E121336 ,7 / : [--:__, / DUCHESS ! PLAZA(1 2 : ________ ,, , I • .. ,.. SR Tit Mike Boyd 1 I i' / ________ , , „.--,..--- __ _________ ......,. . ,..._44 116 _ , _____ __ li ----- - .4. ./..) i _ ___ L _____________ _- - ) CB-1 , CB-1 , --__ _________ -----__ , . 1"= 458.33 feet CR-5 i, 1 4 : _____ --- --- i SUF,'OLK LLS(45-'0 .i: : - :--a «. 9 DO PL4ZA(1-5) - -------- iii : -4 _ II / /.,)- oRAcLEIvILLAG (1-11) ---.• , ,-- : : sR: : : : - - - - - 7 -cw.--1--- '\. CB1 . . ....../.._ , __________--- ,. ..._ _ 1 Alf - - - _____ ..._ \ „:„......,,...„....-_ - _-_- II IP --- \\ ___ __-- _ ,,,, , _ _..------ .- -- ,,,,,,-- \\•----,_.__ _2_3_, .-----,----------- ''‘ '--->-- , r SR , i .,., • . ---- \ ----CR-1 /SUT--F6 i HILLS i / F •'1 I _ , Tr/t. i-(--r-iwt 1 E38413LKA E_31 \ 1011111-\\ i 1 _.... •, _______ ., ..------\ . 10 1 Tax Code:22551011A u: I i 'N. • i ,".1,- Owner:WONG WALTER&VVONG JANE TRUSTEES . ..„ ! ,„--.. -' --- Address: HARELSON i • SR ii . .../... ,..- CitY. : ESTATES(1-15) ,, I i _______.\ .--1::>- 361213E . AA Lega11:SUFFOLK HILLS N150'OF BLK B EXC SWL1 V CO _ ...__.-- i \, -- _ ____---—\ Lega12:(RD 5995/1062) --- \ \(___ ____ . Lot: BK&PG:13018 . - ------.- 1 • Zoning:SR ____ - Basemap:116 ___ I i 1 , i * i . -- --- T -IINIMEN11.._..L. 1 1 I L Rot date:Vey 24,1999; D:kcoveratdkplan31.apr . r . , . • F--- , . , CB I .1-1 : , UFFOL 4 CENTE ' . ATALI NA CITRUS ESTA S '. ) 1 121g26 ' , . P A 4 A i I . IIMMIN..... ... . — .i 12-1-3-35-- -_, .: ,I DUCHESS ift,"4:4?",..,,,,,,fri.,: ,.,,-.. .1,4,4: _____ : F 1 r .. i PLAZA(1-2 i:44/(fittar ,.,„.,.: , ovre. ,,,,,,.: lio.4 • • , , ,,,,,,*•,,,,,,,,w, , , ,244147.44, ,', ,!.:“.:',IIK*44! • , . . • .. SR TR Mike Boyd 1 L , .1 ,1 it/ , - ,,,s,..,Ito,,,,. , .0., -.er.1:14104 ,9 Uratkir*e%..r.• a.:?,..ro.......,..;t0..:-..,,,-4-0,A6,—-..Aivw,,'P'1,4".:.,:•, --________ _ • ,1 16 , . , - --......k.,„:,,,-..,..*74,,,ron, •maleel,,,•-','",,A' iC.;41040).,„0,07:,20..:441141.'',4f, I / P',OftrigAM.Asi'').'"0,...*r4F,,,,";.''..';.5,,r5' / . .:':i s.,,.41440 eV.'t:' -OSOSS: Atatiki ' ) II , "17-**,<MPAtIVPA '"2411: "" "''''l' , .;41044FT',';47,;.;',-1ZA411)*IttigliPS) ------------ ft. , to:p.z. .e,Alii. 4,.!::"Liting•Die . wif,t.,:p D.•,1. 424;10*,',AVA+.,,,4%**;eggrAW. , / CB-1 I , 4 . .,,,,„,...,e.,:kie.,.r...,,,, :..:0,....;-•:-.•••;#0,.,..w:,,' ,,*.m W,,,,,,,,,J7lizAig,',..;4,',44t,-4.',,,:**144, 7rmh.,•004 • r.,:x.;',.•-,30,&44,„•,,A,,,,*„.?...t,44tow-0,,,m4.....,-.a,. 1: POOA4,..„4 —4...,,,,,..,7„:10,40,,,,e,*ow.,/,,,,,A.0,:•."' ,,, . , :,-.4,...41,4t, 0'..,;,:;14,104,',..,'••".•• ,.."''',",o"-.451ita0 --- - _ __ _ ! ' SUF. -.OLK LLS(45- 07) ,m,„,,,,,,,,,, ••• ,,,,t#,,,..,,,,,,: ,„„ -, , .. .„,„,„,„,,„,,,#, •-•,,,,4§:gpsOi., :14R-MfA0. . . .!. . . . - " ' ' " ' " .•:::' • . , CR-5 : n,F,,r,,4. , 6::Kwo,,,',,,w,,,,,,y04,.,.,, ,,, ..,44,,,,„„....,,m,„4,,,.,, ., 70-,'2111,,,,,1 :‘,4K-iit,,„,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,„oropay,„,",, - -;• - - „rw;,,„...:7:-. - ,Dii-In.p. , „,,,,,.„,,,,.,,;,,,,,,,i,1 ,..,#4,—,P.,t',.'k''1WItr'''''',/ ! •' - Fs' / i -70 41IN ,,,,,,, „,,,,,,,,,*„,*0,,..or ,,,,,,,,,,,, , — . .. , .:•:‘,.tvez,..,:,,,,.,..„4,,,,,,,,,,,f.,,,,, , 0'-,,,:A,,,,. : . . - 4?::..•:, -,..r';',.%:.•',. - -.." `•' ' - :•:1'4,44.0,,.•.'"Igi ',,. .,,,In.4.4r,c,,,,,F,;,,,:.veiv.,.-;,,, i ...'.• ,'• ' i gr,Vr.v.::.'„ -•- - - - - - - - -.1m.,,,f:::,..4!!.'i„,,,..,5 A,:!':.,... :,,,,,,,..44..,;;;,Y;..::„..--,;44r:.,:,,,.;....i . , ' - - ,."••-•.'•• --,'-- • , . -.".. .- - ..'40:010r4;,', r;:V.,;,-';',',,,,,;; '',1ft'-,,.. .'1 1 .," I b I, 7,0e- , -„ ;•••;,".,4,'Wf,'511,,,, . - -:- • • ,-,.'••`,•,','..!' .'.,'' ___ _ '''' .,•-•6 ONWV,:1.!!!':',',# ,.',. 1 • . ,,..•e41,404.0.i.rf,,,,,g,,,(;4, '.'',,,,4•0":4'14,41g.WtOffiNY,'. 4:4-'61 i . \ ' z,"4'-.Ai'"*.,;,4 4t7,A,..,:, " ' ' ,...,t,,x,o,,,,, ",,p,,,:.,,,•]..Iiiiitgoo,,,,,r;/#i0,1,,..,,i„0,,,,kg:.,,,,,c,,,...-.10A ., )- I'S v vai•,i';,,St:,,,'g R-zoi,.W,pa,,vw,',.4.,„aol,,.t6;.••,*po,4s',,.o'•po,-•,:.t'.!,w,•,..4‘„-,4„„,,f,,,14,,-..:t,.,,,.,,,,,,..,m..#,,.,,,:,•,.:!,;,,t.e",t,,- --. - .4,,-s-,m-l\,t..\\.,t,,,-':..\.t.,.,.:;.,:k,,.,.N.,1,"\,,\'.!..‘.t h,k'.'.s'i4',4,,,,AN,,,2,,,,,,),,k,,,,.7.,4,..,'„•.:•.N:N,s-.,..N.,4.,,,-1,-•.-s 4,•,,,'i:i:,,:e0..,4i,,.,W.,,,4a0:,,.,,A-v4,u,,.'. 1 o,, . . ...-\ / ORACLEVLLAG•Y - _ coA , \\ -• ''''':-E.--0,)F,,,c1,'.4,".'"4,1 ':"ov-ew'''',,,,,woo,i...%.*<?..k.t, , _ - \ - *PROWOMF,:lt '1/ - - ( CE3-1--'.i,'•w.1,0,,,.,V,,.r„,,4.,„.,,,a..-.„.,F,iMO,,rr,?01.9,i1.,t,.,-.a#51•,11aa4,,,,0z,t r:0•,,a0,,,--,e,,0.,,,,,.,,+,,g-',•',,-,,g*.'.,1,-,#4.-,i4t.d„,i.V,.,.0.:/1:,..',,,.-'-,.. ::•. -. ,,,,-o,.4,,5,,67,K_,,4:,'S,7':''''.`-•,*,b,,,,,:.,VA,tS...fai':,lr,"t,,if,m.s',2-I;1.1,gg4,v4,1,,4i,4,',,,.:V4,,.g-.,i:f,•a,fl",."..:--,':,,",:.p/.M:,.'*A Z.f-ff0,.Ol2.a,,:05,o-1,,"',I,0,g-414,it4w7 'e1-5,,e.7 0CA,i'*0 4 ? , P f.;,; a:0* . _---.--_ _----__-_=-.--• \ . __-- -,, . _-•\\- .. 1\ \\\\, I/ I . sr SR 1 ___, . - .' ________ , -- , - \ \ BUFFO .. HILLS _ - \\ a—1 / (1--44-, ,- A' 1B&BLKA B) \ • - \ s —TR[--- , . .. \ • , ___ • \ • , — .......- ' --------: ..... , ..„ . s Q." _._, .....„. ------ i -- — i , . __. . HRELSON i SR ETATES (1-15) ! .. _ .,---- - , ----1 ------- i L . _ , _._._._.__.-•-•-•-i--- 1------ - , - 471141' Iiii,t' .44/folleY PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION 201 N. Stone Avenue, 2nd Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701-120 JUDITH PATRICK D E C 17, Phone: (520)740-6800 Director Tisri Fax: (520)623-5411 DATE: June 22, 1999 JUN z 1999 TO: Don Laidlaw Laidlaw Consulting L.L.C. - 1735 E. Fort Lowell, Suite 10 Tucson,AZ 85719 phone: 520.322.5339 fax: 520.322.9175 FROM: Greg L. Hagen, Senior Planner RE: Co20-99-54 Co9-98-42 /43 Butterfield Crossing TYPE: Buffer Overlay Zone Review for Rezoning Meeting of June 17, 1999 The Design Review Committee found the presented rezoning site analysis to be in compliance with the performance standards of the Buffer Overlay Zone (Section 18.67.050 of the Zoning Code). The Design Review Committee recommends approval of the site analysis to the Planning and Zoning Commission with the following conditions: 1. All exposed exterior walls and roofs of buildings(unless a roof is screened by a parapet wall extending at least three feet above the building),retaining walls,and accessory structures that are visible from outside the land parcel boundary, shall be earthtone in color and shall blend in with the natural setting. Colors shall not exceed a light-reflective value of 60 percent. Mechanical equipment shall be screened and painted to reduce visibility, as recommended by the standards. 2. No wall will be allowed that impedes wildlife movement through natural open space from and to off-site locations. 3.No high-pressure sodium or mercury vapor lights will be permitted.All external lighting shall be low-intensity, low profile lighting not to exceed 42 inches in height. 4.Before the issuance of any permits a salvage plan for all viable native trees and cacti shall be presented to Pima County Planning for review and approval. The plan shall address salvage and relocation on site of all qualified plantings that are within the disturbance area and cannot be preserved in place. All newly introduced landscape plantings on site should be selected from the approved list as in Pima County Resolution number 1988-151. For details, refer to the DRC tapes. If questions or clarification is required, contact this office at 740-6800. c Barbara Johnson, Steve Magelli,Tina Whittemore L:\USERS\SBREVIEW\D-R-C\1999\06-I7-99\Co20-99-54\61799approval.wpd (i---,,,t, MEMORANDUM i,..„...40; -'.11 TO: - The Honorable Chairman and Members of the Pima County Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: David Guyer, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Design Review Committee (DRC) site analysis review for compliance with the Buffer Overlay Zone (BOZ),rezoning requests Co9-99-42 Wong-Thornydale Road Rezoning;Co9-98-43 Wong-Thornydale Road #2 Rezoning DATE: 22 June 1999 At its hearing 17 June 1999 the DRC reviewed the site analysis for the above-named rezoning cases to determine compliance with the BOZ ordinance. As you are aware, Section 18.67.070B of the Pima County Zoning Code states: "The Design Review Committee shall review an adequate site analysis prior to the first planning and zoning commission public hearing on the rezoning or specific plan". The attached staff report to the DRC includes five conditions, four of which were adopted by the DRC. Condition #4 was deleted in its entirety by unanimous vote. PCPD-02 --' ---- --—-- ... u�r�ivar.rr VI Vv ii r1uL. vL RECORD OF MEETING WITH HOMEOWNERS Co9-98-42143 WONG ORACLE ROAD REZONING Letters were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the subject rezoning inviting them to a meeting on Tuesday, June 22, at 7:00 p.m. at the Lutheran Church of the Ascension on Magee Road. The mailing also included proposed site plans, development standards, design guidelines and a history of prior meetings. Mr. and Mrs. Walter Wong of Tucson and their son, Peter, of Seattle, Washington, were in attendance. At some time past 7:30 p.m_, when nobody else had shown up, I called the homeowner's association president, Don Diguardi, to inquire why he thought there was no attendance. He did not have an explanation, but he quickly dispatched association secretary, Chris Hanley, who arrived at about 7:50 p.m. We spent half an hour with him discussing various matters and he indicated that the consensus of the Board of Directors was that this was a good project and desirable when compared to the alternative of vacant land, homeless encampments and longer term uncertainty. Several minutes after he departed we all left the meeting hail at 8:30 p.m. PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT- PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION JUNE 15, 1999 HEARING: June 30, 1999 411 DISTRICT: 1 11� CASE: Co9-98-43 WONG-ORACLE ROAD#2 REZONING V GHEE , . REQUEST: SR to TR (1.31 acres) .D OWNER: Walter and Jane Wong, Trustees 5437 East Third Street Q- Tucson,AZ 85711 W AGENT: Laidlaw Consulting, L.L.C. ►Y 1735 E. Fort Lowell Road, #10 Q� Tucson,AZ 85719 APPLICANTS PROPOSED USE: "Business and Professional offices." APPLICANT'S STATED REASON: "Oracle Road frontage, adjacent shopping center." COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: The Pima County Comprehensive Plan designates the subject property for Medium/High Intensity Urban (MHIU)uses. That designation allows the CR-1 through CR-5 zones at a density of 24.0 residences per acre (R/AC). In addition, the Plan designation allows the GC, CMH-1, CMH-2, MR, CPI, and TR zones. SURROUNDING LAND USES/GENERAL CHARACTER: North: CB-1 Developed South: SR Undeveloped East: CR-1 Developed West: CB-1 Undeveloped PREVIOUS REZONING CASES ON PROPERTY: Co9-69-40 Sakellar- Florence Highway Rezoning Location: Site. Request: SR to CR-5. Action: Denied. Co9-98-43 STAFF REPORT June 30, 1999 Hearing Page 2 PREVIOUS REZONING CASES IN GENERAL AREA: Co9-97-24 Toy-Oracle Road Rezoning (8.50 acres) Location: On the east side of Oracle Road, approximately 1,000 feet south of the subject property. Request CR-1 to TR. Action: Approved. Ordinance#1998-11, 3 February 1998. Co9-95-58 Criss/Eden - Northern Avenue Rezoning (4.77 acres) Location: On the west side of Northern Avenue, approximately 1/3 mile northwest of the subject property. Request: SR to CR-1. Action: Approved. Ordinance#1996-61, 16 July 1996. Co9-95-36 Sgutt-Cool Drive Rezoning (4.42 acres) Location: On the northwest corner of Cool Drive and Oracle Road, approximately 3/4 mile northwest of the subject property. Request: SR to TR. Action: Approved. Ordinance#1996-40 16 April 1996. Co9-95-35 Sgutt-Cool Drive Rezoning (3.90 acres) Location: On the northwest corner of Northern Avenue and Cool Drive, approximately 3/4 mile northwest of the subject property. Request: SR to TR. Action: Approved. Ordinance#1996-39 16 April 1996. Co9-94-71 Fidelity National Title, Trust#1012/Watson Chevrolet-Oracle Road Rezoning (20.00 acres) Location: On the west side of Oracle Road, immediately west of the subject property. Request: SR to TR, CB-1. Action: Approved. Ordinance#1995-89 17 October 1995. Co9-87-90 Robles- Magee Road#2 Rezoning (4.77 acres) Location: On the south side of Magee Road, approximately 2/3 mile northwest of the subject property. Request: SR to CR-5. Action: Closed. Denied 29 April 1988. STAFF REPORT SUMMARY: Staff recommends APPROVAL of this rezoning request, subject to the standard and special conditions. With appropriate mitigation and design features, as have been required with other recent rezoning requests for this type of use in this vicinity, and with the involvement and concurrence of the affected Suffolk Hills neighborhood to the east, potential adverse impacts of the proposed development can be successfully mitigated or eliminated. Transportation Development Review states the site will be served by Oracle Road, which has an estimated carrying capacity 52,000 average daily trips (ADT); current ADT is 36,600. The proposal should generate 225 ADT at build-out. Flood Control Review states the wash traversing the site carries an estimated 100- year discharge of 1,228 cubic feet per second (cfs). The wash and its associates vegetation are classified as xeroriparian class "C" riparian habitat. The site is located in a designated critical basin but there are no federally mapped floodplains. Wastewater Management Development Review states the site will be served by the public sewerage system. Co9-98-43 STAFF REPORT June 30, 1999 Hearing Page 3 SITE ANALYSIS SUMMARY: This site has an average cross slope of 6.97 percent. There are no restricted peaks, ridges, rock outcrops, or slopes exceeding 15 percent. There is a significant wash (1,228 cfs)traversing a large portion of the site. Five vegetative zones were identified on the site, two of which were identified on this site, which includes a variety of vegetation typically found in the Palo Verde-Saguaro Sonoran Desert Community. There are different vegetative densities and vegetative cover in the various zones. Predominant vegetation includes palo verde, mesquite, palo verde,and creosote,with triangle leaf bursage occupying 15 to 20 percent of the vegetative cover. Cacti include prickly pear, cholla, and pin cushion. Two thirds of the site is heavily vegetated, and a portion of it is identified as "C" xeroriparian habitat. The map of the habitat area is in the process of being revised to correct a discrepancy on it. The actual xeroriparian habitat area "C" will be identified by field survey and inventory at the time of development plan preparation. All mitigation measures required by Article X of the Pima County Flood Control district will be employed. The Arizona Game and Fish Department(AGFD)states several special status species may be found on the site, including the cactus ferruginous pygmy owl, California leaf-nosed bat, Pima indian mallow, and Tumamoc globeberry. Several mitigation strategies are recommended by the AGFD, including maximization of interconnected open space, utilization of native plant species for all on-site vegetation and re-vegetation, employment of vegetative schemes that re-establish and maintain vertical diversity (ground cover, shrub layer, and canopy cover), retention in place of salvage of all mature woody vegetation, and maintenance of the vegetative and hydrologic integrity of all washes, especially those which Pima County's 1986 Map of Critical and Sensitive Wildlife Habitats identifies as Class I or II Riparian Habitat. This site also meets the criteria established by the Board of Supervisors relative to requiring a survey for the cactus ferruginous pygmy owl. Staff recommends condition #10, requiring a survey for the presence or absence of the owl. An archaeological survey was conducted by P.A.S.T. consultants 18 May 1998. The consultant reported that"no isolated artifacts were observed"and "there were no surface indications of archaeological resources on the property which meet the minimum standard for recording as an archaeological site or that would be eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places". Staff recommends condition#11, requiring a mitigation plan if archeological resources are discovered on the site. PLANNING REPORT: OVERVIEW OF THE PROJECT The applicant requests a rezoning of 1.31 acres from SR to TR for the development of an office building with a maximum square footage of 9,000 square feet, which is limited in size because of requirements of the Buffer Overlay Zone (BOZ), which requires a natural open space area of 50 percent. The end use of the development proposal has not been determined. The site is currently for sale. This request was filed in conjunction with Co9-98-42 Wong-Thornydale Road Rezoning, and share many of the same development characteristics. Parcels with frontage along Oracle Road in this vicinity have been rezoned to allow commercial activity on them. There seems to be a general tend toward a gradual conversion of these parcels into non-residential uses, with existing, developed, residential subdivisions remaining behind the non-residential uses. While this type of activity is not necessarily "good" or"bad" for a residential neighborhood, developments of this type should provide mitigation measures to lessen their impact onto surrounding residential areas. Co9-98-43 STAFF REPORT June 30, 1999 Hearing Page 4 The applicant proposes several development related standards to help buffer the adjoining Suffolk Hills neighborhood from potential adverse impacts from this development. Those standards include building materials, colors, textures, fenestration, building mass, landscaping, and lighting. Any two-story buildings will be located farthest away from the subdivision to further limit any disturbance to it. The standards further state that the uses on the site will be limited to"business and professional office functions. . ."and concludes by stating"and other functions that do not require the stocking of goods for sale or the boarding and treating of animals" . Staff recommends condition#12, limiting the site to professional and office related uses. The applicant has not indicated whether or not affected property owners in the Suffolk Hills subdivision to the east have agreed to the proposed standards,and should be prepared to further address them at the public hearing before the Commission. CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SURROUNDING AREA This site is directly south of Plaza Escondido, a developed shopping center, zoned CB-1, which includes a Trader Joe's, a hardware store, bakery, tire store, bank, and other uses; there is a vacant building which at one time housed a Safeway grocery store. Other shopping centers anchor the northeast and southwest corners of the Oracle/Magee Road intersection,with a strip mall on the northwest corner of the intersection. South of the site is an undeveloped parcel, zoned SR,while farther south are developed parcels, zoned TR. East of the site is the developed Suffolk Hills subdivision, zoned CR-1. West of the site is an undeveloped parcel zoned TR, which was part of a 30-acre rezoning request in 1994 (Co9-94-71 Fidelity National Title, Trust#1012/Watson Chevrolet-Oracle Road Rezoning). COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR THE SITE: In1998 the applicant applied for a minor revision to the Comprehensive Plan to change the Plan designation from Low Intensity Urban 1.2 (LIU 1.2)to Medium/High Intensity Urban (MHIU). The applicant stated, that because of development along Oracle Road, residential uses were unsuitable, and there was a Plan oversight which omitted this parcel (and one directly south, also included in the minor revision request, but owned by a different party) from the MHIU designation which is in place on other parcels to the south. In recommending approval of the minor revision, staff concurred with the applicant's argument that the future of the area was attuned more to non-residential development, and added that the designation would provide a reasonable transition between Oracle Road and the existing CR-1 neighborhood (Suffolk Hills) to the east. At its public hearing 29 April 1998 the Commission voted 9 - 0 to recommend approval of the minor revision. At its hearing 16 June 1999 the Board of Supervisors, on a vote of 5 - 0, approved the minor revision. SONORAN DESERT CONSERVATION CONCEPT PLAN (SDCCP): On 2 March 1999 the Board of Supervisors adopted the Sonoran Desert Conservation Concept Plan (SDCCP). The concept plan included a policy that stated no upzonings in environmentally sensitive or historic areas except when accompanied by actual conservation. As of this writing the details of how to apply this policy to individual rezoning cases are still being formulated. Under the SDCCP this site is designated as part of the "palo verde-saguaro sonoran desert community", and a "major extension of riparian habitat from protected areas". Co9-98-43 STAFF REPORT June 30, 1999 Hearing Page 5 BUFFER OVERLAY ZONE: On 11 August 1998 the Board of Supervisors adopted revisions to the Buffer Overlay Zone ordinance,which included the Coronado National Forest. The applicant will be required to conform to those revisions as they apply to the 1.31 acre site, all of which is within one mile of the preserve. One of the primary purposes of the Buffer Overlay Zone (BOZ), is to"preserve and protect the open space characteristics of those lands in the vicinity of the public preserves while at the same time permitting the economically reasonable use of lands". The BOZ is not intended to promote or discourage changes in underlying zoning, but rather provide continuing performance standards for the unique lands within the BOZ. The BOZ contains certain performance criteria, including the use of color, reflective finishes, visibility of mechanical equipment, fences and walls, lighting, setbacks, utilities, vegetation, natural open space, and visual quality standards. Fifty percent of the affected area must remain natural open space; however, the property owner may preserve a greater percentage of natural open space. Natural open space is defined in the Zoning Code as: "An area of land, essentially unimproved and not occupied by any structures or man-made impervious elements,except pedestrian and non-motorized access trails,that is set aside,dedicated or reserved by recorded plat or covenant running with the land for public or private enjoyment as a preservation or conservation area" The applicant is scheduled to present this proposal to the Design Review Committee 17 June 1999, as required under the BOZ ordinance. A copy of the staff recommendation to the DRC is enclosed with this report. Staff will provide further information relative to that recommendation, and DRC action on it, prior to the Commission hearing 30 June 1999. The applicant should note that contemplated exceptions to the BOZ may result in substantial changes to the preliminary development plan. MAJOR STREETS AND SCENIC ROUTES PLAN: Oracle Road is a state highway and as such is also a designated major scenic route, which means that the height of all buildings may not exceed 24 feet within 200 feet of the future right-of-way. All buildings must be set back 30 feet in addition to one half of the required future right-of-way width according to the Major Streets and Scenic Routes (MSSR) Plan. The MSSR Plan has specific building design criteria which prohibit highly reflective finishes, colors, and materials and must also use colors which are compatible with natural landscape (desert/earth tones). The preliminary development plan (pdp) submitted by the applicant appears to address the MSSR building setback and height requirements. This site is also included in Catalina Foothills Special Area Policy 2-19, which states that no buildings exceeding 24 feet in height shall be permitted without specific authorization from the Board of Supervisors. In addition, that policy reserves the right of the Board to limit construction to one story. The applicant states that the height of all buildings on the site will not exceed 24 feet and two stories. Staff recommends condition#13, limiting building heights to 24 feet and two stories. Co9-98-43 STAFF REPORT June 30, 1999 Hearing Page 6 VEGETATION All "high density" vegetation adjacent to the east boundary and within 25 feet of the wash channel will be preserved, as will a strip ranging in depth from 65 to 90 feet, exclusive of the driveway along Oracle Road, north of the proposed entry drive. The applicant further states that the "riparian environment of the wash will not be disturbed". Further vegetation mitigation measures proposed by the applicant include natural open space borders on three sides of the site,and salvaging of"viable"mesquite trees for replanting on-site. Some form of bufferyard "D" is required on the east, south, and west perimeter of the site. TRANSPORTATION REPORT: The property proposed for rezoning is served directly by Oracle Road(Florence Highway)between Ina Road and Magee Road. Oracle Road is a paved, six-lane divided State Highway with an existing right-of-way of 200 feet.Also, It is a designated scenic route. Current traffic consists of approximately 36,600 Average Daily Trips (ADT) and the current roadway capacity is approximately 52,000 ADT. The proposed project will generate approximately 225 ADT based on general office uses. The petitioner proposes one access point to Oracle Road. FLOOD CONTROL REPORT: The property proposed for rezoning consists of moderately sloping desert terrain with moderate to heavy desert vegetation. Drainage affecting the property consists mainly of on-site runoff and one minor wash.The wash traversing the property carries an estimated 100-year discharge of 1,228 cfs.This wash and associated vegetation are classified as Xeroriparian class C habitat. On-site drainage shall be routed through the development in the natural wash channel to existing exit points. The majority of the runoff from the wash enters a large box culvert under Oracle Road and then proceeds west. The remaining water is detained behind Oracle Road with some of the water diverted south in a constructed drainageway. The property is located in a designated critical basin and there are no Federally mapped floodplains. WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT: There is currently adequate conveyance capacity to accommodate this rezoning in the downstream sewerage system. This is not a commitment of conveyance capacity allocation. Conveyance capacity allocation is accomplished by execution of a Sewer Service Agreement, which normally occurs during the development plan or plat review process. If conditions change between now and the time a development plan or tentative plat is submitted, the property owner may be required to augment the existing public sewerage system in order to provide adequate conveyance capacity for this rezoning. Connection may be made to the 8-inch sewer line, S-125, located on the east and south side of the parcel. Public sanitary sewers to be constructed with this rezoning shall be located within paved roadways or alleyways, or within easements that provide vehicular access, whenever possible, to all manholes. We have no objection to this rezoning. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REPORT: The Department has no objection provided the property is served by a public or private sewer. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COMMENTS: As of the date of this report there has been no response from the Town of Oro Valley. Co9-98-43 STAFF REPORT June 30, 1999 Hearing Page 7 WATER DISTRICT REPORT: Please see the attached report from Tucson Water. PARKS AND RECREATION REPORT: As of the date of this report there has been no response from the Parks and Recreation Department. SCHOOL DISTRICT REPORT: Please see the attached report from the Amphitheater Unified Public School District. IF THE DECISION IS MADE TO APPROVE THE REZONING, THE FOLLOWING STANDARD AND SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED: Completion of the following requirements within five years from the date the request is approved by the Board of Supervisors: 1. Recording of a covenant holding Pima County harmless in the event of flooding. 2. Recording of the necessary development related covenants as determined appropriate by the various County agencies. 3. Provision of development related assurances as required by the appropriate agencies. 4. There shall be no further subdividing or lot splitting without the written approval of the Board of Supervisors. 5. Prior to the preparation of the development related covenants and any required dedication, a title report (current to within 60 days) evidencing ownership of the property shall be submitted to the Department of Transportation, Real Property Division. 6. Transportation conditions: A. Provision of all necessary access improvements to Oracle Road as determined by the Arizona Department of Transportation.These improvements shall need the approval of the Arizona Department of Transportation and meet the appropriate standards prior to the approval of any development plan or subdivision plat for any portion of the subject property. B. Written certification from the Arizona Department of Transportation stating satisfactory compliance of all its requirements including approval of the number, the location and the design of all access points to the subject property from Oracle Highway shall be submitted to the Pima County Development Services Department prior to the issuance of any building permits. 7. Flood Control conditions: A. The property owner must dedicate all rights-of-way and/or grant flowage easements for drainage purposes to Pima County, as determined necessary by the Flood Control District during the plan review process. B. Drainage shall not be altered, disturbed or obstructed without the written approval of the Flood Control District. C. All internal drainage improvements and any external drainage improvements required to mitigate drainage impacts caused by the proposed development shall be constructed at no cost to Pima County. 8. Wastewater Management condition: The property owner must connect to the public sewer system at the location and in the manner specified by Wastewater Management at the time of review of the tentative plat, development plan or request for building permit. 9. Adherence to the preliminary development plan as approved at public hearing. Co9-98-43 STAFF REPORT June 30, 1999 Hearing Page 8 10. The site shall be surveyed for the presence or absence of the cactus ferruginous pygmy owl by a qualified biological consultant who has a permit from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 11. If during construction, materials that may be human remains and associated burial items are discovered, ground disturbing activities in the vicinity of the site will cease, the discovery site will be secured, and the Arizona State Museum will be immediately notified. 12. Uses shall be restricted to professional and semi-professional offices. 13. Building heights are limited to 24 feet and two stories. Respectfully Submitted, David Guyer, Senior Planner for Frank P. Behlau,AICP Principal Planner FB/dg xc: Mr. and Mrs. Walter Wong, 5437 East Third Street, Tucson, AZ 85711 Mr. Don Laidlaw, Laidlaw Consulting, L.L.C., 1735 East Fort Lowell Road, #10, Tucson, AZ 85711 PIMA COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS ',''' 1 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 11 y � 9 �a �• PLANNING DIVISION D EK z'o��` 201 N.STONE AVENUEJLI -30 "' i ti r\-% TUCSON,ARIZONA 85701 . C �AR1.Z• r METER-' RETURN SERVICE REQUESTED Case Number: CO9-98-43 B/S Taxcode: 225510490 MAC DONALD WILLIAM W&GIBBONS EVELYN M JT/RS 7769 N ARUNDEL CT TUCSON AZ 857040000 • e'►S104"' ("J2. flfifi i fif l fFfflif {ffi Ffi if iffFf�iif IFf f!lf Miff o � PIMA COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS JOSIAGC - G��, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT _ `�,U.S.' .1 l� fir, Zii.z_? , E/ t �. PLANNING DIVISION JUL 30 .99 —" M x �� «ptj/ 201 N.STONE AVENUE i , 4 " TUCSON,ARIZONA 85701 Hi t �\.ARIZ•/ .,.,.,,,. F97p203Q t x RETURN SERVICE REQUESTED Case Number: CO9-98-43 B/S Taxcode: 225510130 CHF ENTERPRISES %FOSTER&FOSTER ENTR 000000000 Returned For Better Address AFFIDAVIT OF P"BLICATION STATE OF ARIZONA) :ss. COUNTY OF PIMA ) STAC:EY 3 T T NSIDI\1 being first duly sworn, deposes and says that (he) (she) is the Legal Advertising Manager NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPROVAL (8 -0, Commissioner PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD RisMtSpendlanan were absent). iE DAILY TERRITORIAL, a daily newspaper printed and published in the BY THE PIMA COUNTY BOARD OF Staff recommends APPROVAL SUPERVISORS on MONDAY, 88-d3 WONG-ORACLE ROAD AUGUST 16, 1999 at or after 9:00 REZONING a.m. in the Board of Supervisors ty of Pima, State of Arizona, and of general circulation in the City of Tucson, Hearing Room, First Floor, Superior Request of Wetter and Jane Wong Courts Building. 110 West Congress represented by Don Laidlaw and Street,Tucson,Arizona,at which time Associates. for a rezoning of 1.31 and place all interested persons will acres from SR(Suburban Ranch)to have an opportunity to appear and be TR(Transitional),located on the east Ity of Pima, State of Arizona and elsewhere, and the hereto attached heard on this matter. side d Oracle Road, approximately Please note that property owners 1/4 nrie south of Magee Road. The within 300 feet of a proposed request lies within and conforms to the U T A—M I_I ICI T A N A rezoning, substantial change or Pura CountyComprehensive Plan. E E T Fi E I_i N I !N CG specific plan request may fife written Col-89-2 he Planning and Zoning approvals or protests of the change at Commission recommends ;�I CN 0C:E any time prior to the close of the APPROVAL (8 - 0, Commissioners Board of Supervisors'public hearing. Rickles and Spend�a nan were absent). If twenty percent (20%). by number Stay recommends APPROVAL and area, of the owners of property (District 1) within 300 feet of the rezoning, TIME EXTENSION substantial change or specific plan file WITH RESOLUTION written protests,an affirmative vote of Co9S2-29 TITLE SECURITY three-fourth(3/4)of all members of the AGENCY TR 163-SHANNON ROAD Board ofro athe Supervisorsowill be required REZONING printed and published correctly in the regular and entire issue of said THE to approve the rezoning, substantial Request of NCH Corporation change or specific plan. Written represented by MJM Consulting,Inc., approvals or protests may be filed with for a two-year time extension on the the Pima County Development above referenced rezoning from SR to Services Department, Planning TR en ompas-sing 11-98 acres. The Y TERRITORIAL for issues; that the first was made Division, 201 N. Stone Avenue, 2nd subeed site was rezoned in 1992 and Floor,Tucson,AZ 85701,or with the is located on the south side of Ina Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. Road,approximately 425 feet west of 1 This is not a complete agenda and Shannon Road. Staff recommends does not reflect the order in which APPROVAL ,(District 1) day of 19 cases will be heard. Please call 740- DC*E BY ORDER OF THE PIMA (-1 t h J U L Y 99 6800 one week prior to the Hearing for COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS the correct agenda order. Publicly THIS 27TM DAY OF JULY lastpublication thereof was made on the dayof noticed items may be continued during 1plTRl�Pf-LONE: PUBLIC WORKS e the Board's meetings. If an item is - DEVELOPMENT SERVICES - 30 t h moved from the Public Hearing date PLANNING DIVISION 740-6800. noted above to a future date,the new PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial date will be announced at the above LY 19 ';c; ;that said publication noticed meeting July 1999 i pnrnajuta 7/30/99 ss j REZONINGS 1 co9-99-11 MAJUTA - MONTANA ,,,ide on each of the following dates,to-wit: STREET REZONING Request of Ra''ruwd and Viola Majuta ,fora rezoning of 3.37 acres from SR (I r/__;(I/9 9 (Suburban Ranch)to CR-1 (Single Residence),located on the west side of Camino de Oeste, approximately 1,000 feet south of Irvington Road. The request lies within ltnd conforms to the Pima County Comprehensive Plan. Co7-89-2. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends APPROVAL (9 - 0, Commissioner Rickles was absent). Staff Request of recommends APPROVAL. (District 3) F'C: PLANNING ;: DEVELOPMENT Co9-99-12 ZIEGLER-LAMB DRIVE REZONING Request of Silvia and Erika Ziegler, for a rezoning 1.07 of acres from GR- 1(Rural Residential)to SH(Suburban Homestead), located on the south side of Lamb Drive,approximately 1/4 mile east of Oracle Road and 1/4 mile south of Mainsailan Boulevard.onform The Iai13Territorial' request lies within and conforms to the Pima County Comprehensive Plan, Co7-89-2. It does not conform to the Lego del Oro Zoning Plan(Co13-63- 17B), which calls for CMH-2 zoning. The Planning and Zoning Commission ` ` �"�y,� ' 1 recommends APPROVAL (9 - 0, By Commissioner Riches was absent). Staff recommends APPROVAL Cistrict 3) o9-98-42 WONG-ORACLE ROAD Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of REZONING :�t) Il JL)L4' Request of Wetter and Jane Wong represented by Don Laidlaw and Associates for a rezoning of 6.47 1 9 acres from SR(Suburban Ranch)and `l'-! � � .i� CR-1 (Single Residence) to TR ,,�.--� CF;=ICIAL SEAL (Transitional), located on the '---'�?r DAWN LEIGH DOUGALL northeast and southeast corners of r-/,' ='-�, .- Oracle Road and Suffolk Drive. The • - ms 7 NOTARY PUBLIC-ARIZONA request lies within and conforms to the �• Pima County Comprehensive Plan. L t/i-4. Vk-L- k.- - PIMA COUNTY the e Planning and Zoning Notary Public in and or the C sty or-7 Ex:: es Sept.20,2002 Commission recommends My Commission Expires: aoin '{:, k..kdig. -t , COTLO\ t `. .\ c o w t ' , •L, f o0 * M""i ' S, inky ti .- � \ _ N �4Y�� ' :•�i�.�a,�r -,ram=b+ •►. r.)y . • • { . t y -N A .a�y _ ' .Rite+ F�.- t f Zv" - : rrr � .� .,�,J- ,.� i •:.A. s.`,h41.a .♦ J 4 1. x ' Y as *AA x• r .$�' - `�51 "`. ' {i` APPROVED BY COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR DENIED BY COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED YES(SEE ATTACHED) NO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR DATE ITEM SUMMARY,JUSTIFICATION& SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: REZONING Co9-98-43 WONG- ORACLE ROAD#2 Request of Walter and Jane Wong, represented by Don Laidlaw and Associates, for a rezoning of 1.31 acres from SR(Suburban Ranch)to TR(Transitional), located on the east side of Oracle Road, approximately 1/4 mile south of Magee Road. The request lies within and conforms to the Pima County Comprehensive Plan,Co7-89-2. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends APPROVAL(8-0,Commissioners Rickles and Spendiarian were absent). Staff recommends APPROVAL. (District 1) SCHEDULED FOR THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS' AUGUST 16, 1999 HEARING in the Board of Supervisors Hearing Room First Floor, Superior Courts Building 110 W. Congress, Tucson, AZ STAFF RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL ^'\----- TOTAL COST TO PIMA COUNTY:$ N/A FUNDING SOURCE: N/A HAS FUNDING BEEN APPROVED IN THIS FISCAL YEAR'S BUDGET: Yes No ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARING: X Yes No REQUEST FOR: Action Discussion X Discussion/Action EFFECTIVE DATE: / / TERMINATION DATE: / / BOARD OF SUPERVISOR DISTRICT X 1 2 3 4 5 All IMPACT: IF APPROVED: The property would be conditionally rezoned per the request of the applicant. IF DENIED: The property would remain in the current zoning category. AGENDA ITEM INITIATED BY: Laidlaw Consulting, L.L.C. Date: 8/4/99 DEPARTMENT NAME: Public Works - Development Services Department- Planning Division DIVISION MANAGER'S SIGNATURE: Frank P. Behlau, Zoning Administrator DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR'S SIGNATURE: Jim Mazzocco, Planning Official CONTACT PERSON: Frank P. Behlau PHONE# 740-6800 PROCESSING PERSON: Monica Molina i''''' 1 , , eo MEMORANDUM q$IzoVIt* PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT - PLANNING DIVISION TO: Honorable Mike Boyd, Supervisor, District #1 FROM: Jim Mazzocco, Planning Official '`\,,_, DATE: August 4, 1999 SUBJECT: Co9-98-43 WONG - ORACLE ROAD #2 The above referenced rezoning within your district was heard by the Planning and Zoning Commission on JUNE 30, 1999, and is scheduled for the Board of Supervisors' AUGUST 16, 1999 hearing. REQUEST: Rezone from SR to TR (1.31 acres) OWNER: Walter and Jane Wong, Trustees 5437 East Third Street Tucson, AZ 85711 AGENT: Laidlaw Consulting, L.L.C. 1735 E. Fort Lowell Road, #10 Tucson, AZ 85719 PUBLIC COMMENT TO DATE: Staff has received no public comment on this case. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends APPROVAL (8 - 0, Commissioners Rickles and Spendiarian were absent). STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends APPROVAL. FB/DG/mm Attachments T12S R13E bl 224 I 225 P226 ] 227 228 ] E g= ' I 1 " <I Ji I ORO VALLEY (.!HITS TANGERINE' f I ROAD 1 _ H F. 12000N LIMITS CRYST/.l PALACE PL a AA AA I 101 OR 1 ; I COP„ c AB 1 OCS(R7$c .-J1 oLoft.OpmgPG 4,O I I SIIVERLEAI� DR AF I - j I i c s j I ' M r ' NAG I FEAlMER GRASS Pt s A 1y e `� a cA•rTNOAN n A, AfattOP, [A••• w GOAr,n[ST[[A Pt p aP`P,A1A°' 1 Sf"W(L(OW PL<a J,50 �,'i•C DA•LOOw SPA"."' a0 LOto(.4Er Pt $TRADA Q P 5 I AD cA•r[ACLt Av[ r cot o[«c[r iP DR 3 CRYSTA f RN .[ Tufwl TO.t n o LODE STON(rl 1 LIOVFR RD yJf. LL JNE W,AY SMaKEt� OB ar w.t AtcAAss N. a c«o1[PI II I IORO >I a AlM`1 N[•Ltt IAwD w4 n =rUw1•iw I ,i-:--- �i- .J PS AD x^ CAI. Dorf rt 1.40T LOOP AR O tow[SIA.t"'Pt r coto e•P n TANGS L. I W J ~ f.'O,'"AN \lV a/ c TD.LST(w rt w Aut10.Pt -q O lip E S R P ~ •A POS[Ou•ATtn aTI D[(PCIOVEA tN p/L RA PL I > VALLEY 1 7`� - 1�=CRKTAL OJ ; ' f C I JZ 4` S L,�.�V SION Cg SiI I p0` REL. > a I o CRKTALDOWNSCT ; SJhSt PINE CT $DUAWBUct DRIVE f .Arz �A > NARANJA j zE 11200N ,>t k;' d ,,, o\l's ;OMEar ST /_:�/ // 1. ♦ / U (i�'r7 f cc, z �! 0 F^ l SHINNECOCK LOOP RWq' ,•C 4 ♦ / i LYNNE EC/r E ti ✓ F �y,E / o ..55E`i..Er nor '1' E1 Conbuu[acbr :;:.; r/ ,.;:`, 'I�°�?,� Np Cour:4 Club •t ', `r U ARO.- DIVIDE ( .,;:.! - �_Tm ,. 9 f 53 7 _ " SAHUARO l' F. `C-'`•P '" . S:r / P NIN LN t pt ORE Ct� �,,l .�_.Z., 4 w 1 L ���..✓ DIVIDE . HILLS rr0 . �-, .'i '� •f " ATE ` ....P.N. t„ •,DC��OUINT A' 1 � 1•-yr ... o i o , NOL 1 C..... V ALTO O UP,AOUST/F.f' . a�O .C ,L y `'` 'r Fi C 3 k'��� [nsPa'f' A.INvERNE •" iINO CAMINO GNADA P '-1 .. r `� L!A L B.$ILVERADO PIS '2 o_ ALTO `;L. .J-0.11.BLED°N''1/4,- s,,`�.._ E-:_ "_!J 6J 1,-.i."LOMAO`ti0 c" 9�' /C:SAW GRASS PL 6G DIAMOND C �S ..> ma's l BR ^` i O lr�- • £.CROOKED STICK DR O cc i D^�t�` OOOp,4J v �•- f SOUTHERN PINES DR a' op CAMINO 4p ,,, `��z o> sA l,[, BF SE'„+Lr. .' MIND CHRISTY Z CHRISTY At' = L `L, < i�6 6J T? ,rV J �_ JCL t (,y`ldV LAMBERT m _ as fSERTGREENSWYd LANE aEGP s��%4 �,+ ''`•;:- ,'o a uALL.EY _ .may . I N'.y r o. LEAR WA•I 4.4E, ' o -'G r, MP794, �(/E,�o�, ['r �.�1 !pV C JJar 1{q PS.:^O . AL ICY Y ff I y 10400N FL a\J o GC ::, ii-A E�B�CP ®NEE _ '1: PSPP O [,.,;,.•, -,.,_r,� ▪;;o CountyCA..,Pi O I f.�.�E ? -.J aQ: 1 �.�;. •,' 1. ^]:.::2. p,a o k YYFF r� j. Q ',NA WAY PIA.v N N •.L .. r�a P `^.tA,:..A. A♦/OP ' ..` 09,Y+,,ENOCK PL A WINDANALKER PL i O SALTON Z H "oc ' A Q CPl` I 4'�\'s. .- < 1 Y O,r 9 ' V2 O OMB VA E ao 8 STAR RANCH TR a O j . 'I ' 2 Pl P/y o ,.P f f 6� c. R "^ I OW PLA.i c li `` 1q ti ^ %, ' C STONEY NORTNBROOKTR u(.P4O°. RD r� ( oa ,.. 3S0 ',^ ✓S ( \EW °'o.,'...\., . Oi/ D.DESERT UwNTRSTR SJQ4Tt K z-�'V 7 SQ .AR ANAP�O �.CORTO o COXG 0.CS . /.i.�y i4 /, ~V -.T i ao`:Vally;� B E IF' t( r O E DESERT UWN TR CASCABELL S /f °A0 t I i F SAWMILL SPRING TR 4Y z ( .' OR ONOR4 DR RNLNIICKi 0 `!M1 Lip - .•,,..'�_C_OUI,.,`�tuD AAA.. F. EL CONOUIST ;6-G SKY RIDGE FL A_ .tr '.'1'Z y` .,...5., ;.,(-,.;,-' ' .^ r 7• J I `R� O aCKTl15 0 � OASIS RO ; (h� PMP .< '+(IL Nut N / �_' >ti� ;v+bR0 ,RD f'.wo��.�;:y . WAY Il�� "..TRC LORIDGE3.(B ND(P TREE TR C•.,,,M LA, O, _,6 50 HULA 1p 6.osiur RIDGE t. /T -z00 �P A10 `.t� W 0 0 LA GTERVA o c.' OPC ? FOC C.DSSUM RUNtN i ''' -, N.'v ALER. '''T Q .° °A I A\. `• QE,?�R`, _ _ r Is,'� /N CAMINO DE O ON c i FO.OSSUM GAEEIIIN I J, � 1 CIR A Od AMY a JII F'^~'^Aul TR LAMINO DEL SIi10 0 - `PS .t0 �(w lD tyRK[r tw ORAN . DESERT SP r T�/jH CAM r w-.3�T RIBERA f -z R .` S LN r we.R•MOIL w•. ,' IAO PI c I Q 4AwrD.� to.e�/- P CAMINO G��HORNOS G W `7 LP `a I A W (,r ",:: r I;,7A �., : •._,-,; CAM NO LLANO _ c,„ JCOR MP No c zA . h,, y ./!KR...,„D LN l n�� 47UP TUA PL o, o 2 f! 0 ; d ROAD[tN �)E '+ r- ae CAJ CAMINO EBANO' �. i S CAN �" r coet[w000 N. G E`�. Sj. 1 ,- SkY RD fIEICCREST IN I O ; UN'RC'''. S t Z -, .., zGN,'ON':ROOK TR a 84"4 o OOW,OM SNADO 1 S«t[r•Rr w" I Av-1,:i Pllt a �3 � CAMINO DE LA 10YA �! M ,� � a P[wAPo rt � my 1 O BElCOURTE Pl I i, -''• ; «'8, .Wp0 VtfW RESTICAMINO DEL f,DESEO 6 '''''','...A.:'''''-5r CP P`/ '.,!O. e+to Nt•D Pt o l� NC' SUNTREE ST D z u <O 11,�, 1 / rt0$[CR[tR PI (E I -.V- I, O l• Y RZ c ARL[YWQTD.CAMINO DEL K VENEGAS IUCERO RD .. O .COLONIAL Pt R DC' O o SU TER R m�, 4 y P W R[DGEIAMD $T I z .S f ; Jz HALTONT DR CAMINO DEL.'MEDRANO OP o LALPUSE P[ •,, bj I �' -� - - -•- S o OI pp`C`M�INO DEL S GRIIAIVA •- --- - - - - - - - -- - D raSo.INn i KENIIYLORTN Y HIGHCOURTE .LNLN /d - - - _ -gW LI A YISTA B, �/ - 'f' VISTA z I BIVD - MP7B Q y_ - + - IIXDA•SANDw(OGl Pt > CG �~ ~ 9600NVALLEY :Y_� 2 SPINNAKER R .. 'f 3.BEAUAEOHT Ll4 d' i _ - >CMO.DEL ' �'NCNO r ..,o f\o Penrus O i /�� Ell • •>Z t m W u AURORA A.SANDY RIDGE LN Pt Z o- Pr "' W. / .•^ R P• ., i < OR FREER z DR O 8.GNTON CREEK IN O /�• D O' a r_`.., TERFLY W LN MONMOIITH ST DR C.GNYON CREEK Pl ", O ON DR m. T r Z 3 f E-,,,,pi, CMO DEL SUR p Pt O,y 1;'-t-`:.;• G D-SPRINGW0001N O t 'PL.."'" V.N 12;';?.� i J oL IRE ST \ a IAME5�0[1 Y =S P4'rS�Y h f < E.OAKIAND HILLS Lt. P!,_� 1 4t� PLc z WIL'E 1.�E j' q 2 yl RN,?Cr L'Kg �4'4, o woe OI ,'"Af O< CATAIPA2C Sr4 r`� �/ q L '1�()E�RLY a, CanyonHS Om [�,_.t. O! O r' A CITA V� ��'er ? ECT r HAMPSHIRE CT K WANES g FOS A Rp RD E C NC CA CONCORDIA t �13� 5..1. ,,,",. cHTsoR i Srsr PPr [A ORO s W E RTON colD«ATER` N 3'L / A 6 J P / RD o O R N.Pl O r st•o[L oRa K �1'° A /� O ;.,,,,,-, WHITEGATE IN BfPS3SEoz ! q CqPO OROI LING HILL$$T p ='� w Z 3 'j'.QO OD V t,CANADA 3S` IMP- GNTERBURY l^� lLL P O �. 'r WSTA HL Mf ,£ o�,K JG. EDROCNooVERDEG10LOP MDBK. oor aro s Oh4COpo (AUR FAIR ME�n,,Z$ IMNGT > 609 l¢DR N(WTON -� M P(Z,il 5fl KALLEr �`M' Oga'LLNO Q) P o f, "Pl �e CADOWBP pOA y(l ✓ MESA VERO� IN� tN AUp x// 3 Q /(�Y S O ,) ,fSSY . y 1080 RD Pi- gOO[L L-�; SHAR SOAR f RA U BIRCH WAY O i t� o, om SPRING �' S4N A( 5 O g Pte INT IN i ON PE' Po�LEY(N.' GS ▪HICKORY OR p O 1'4,1EV DR P OR/ 4. 1 z s SE'PTO (�-�y'�' SEA PILAF z;-, NT }. :':',..i F DR ; L Y W T SfQ' aS H < _ E,OR' .<.,'A" INES LA„ S lN; tN / MIGUElITO RD st, a i r0 S,HADOWoI>. o r �,EDFh F .g N< c i 1 1 C.PEREZOSA I HTRF 5' ! d % f z r, PE z s~ y MP77 < L i x 2 C.PERFEC7A --y� OWN FLN (!�, �' < C < 'E' TOWN d > Q i H P A oE= AM[K WAINUS CR - ; q l �. J I " HARDY:::i ~ _ RD >- .-.-, 1 HARDY D - z-L w - 44-.. - - w,11 - - -'LICE - - - :r ." >'-O o NEWPORTJ -, ALTA 'F _ 00� :, O PL ACITA A o ATAFM TR - pp / PV CYPRESS RD Q. SON.DUI R. 0LA UILA AERIE 1...-,71,WATSON DR,�OF f� 8 'L•J� E `EM Y i (� 0 (It.. PL A' CLUMPY WACO.Y OR P' .E�� 2.S'•�¢. \'P♦ o ••�wI.. NP < A•'1 oc-OP CAMI ILA c Cit4 z u\>� tr o !•r NNDSOR CREST PL t d Ow � I3 l A f vO''4' �t�,��,ale ., CORA(J,, o rAIMRIDGE IN z ' Cr:' (1 i '•I zi i a y N[WPORT DR U.DE lA 11ANZAIIA W yJ N Y�L DR A O .".-1Ji �• _':1A, •2 Z O E.LEMON 'E'Oq 41 % 1 OFEA -G7 y,CAII(11NW[S 4'F i GLE NHU R$I DR Vf.DE LA BEILTCTA - A�* ARTS .`- 6�YO.�y 2' - L SNST ��A ST P C' b r $ [ LA DE LOS UURElES .,., TAL' u ' V. s7E 1a /.Y,E`'I).,, fr ''�-' PINE ST PINE O ` T 0 o •ENA O ,3� fl o � _�' KNOII lNW z P a PINE S 90 f o(1 ZA CMO.GREf FIELD`�_ �� IRIGA NAY �NATIONALI DR F ' A /:". . �, S N~ P ,-,cc-...,", VIDR OR ALKEY lN�•TR•v ppLN (.moo•,+� OR.t p,:=F::-`�`tii-��'��'.�' ASH 9R�p�DRG rc PL �? \ ` {AINO 'e : UNSF + PN ., INS LN -noTh„is REFIf U`70. a (TI OM ( ,.i-i r0-..� � l\"1"1,. 'Ki , 09 Zfi Tucs Nefgnal, CMO. o1 `fI / ,l ? \YC RANU RIO O CAMI 0 4R[' < J ♦' LDE M^/)��i`,IL 0 z `y v ti; '-' -I'� A - C PP 1F/1 SAGE ST r - ( Pl.i RMS L N . A • cc sdR' n i.:: (/3E;A[r i�I.. O OE pY7 DR RILE DADIVOSO< o C4 Tq[h :Yr,_l M • U.- r QDR% '' ''^J P- .y i , 'Cr-- M z o 4. F 5G Course, _µA � ",`i• R ' O pry r9 C.CAT P`,\. o [ >ji r u':`�� 4 ,P�' ..'" I MLOn,{� Or ?�4wR�R ML,�a �.4�.4 I pi''. .�_ .),� :A,?�.. YB , S, F o 8 �t �NO,0 tP • P( 4 pL r ter_ 4hG b y 2. )'r-.-1 ..P•, ..1'•'i.i;l o c OELI CIR Rl 7 E�V13 S R. 4' /(/ P( i O I - 1'`-.�.'l:. • •7'�:� ¢ \O -.5 S a PIA. Y/ LAS CASAS �.�j DR P p /-2.: O,t 7Y 3 r 1)-:-.:Zra;-,•.:• a..- '''. P BELIAS DR A�7 .t 0� CHO GN S WN r t '1•i; f-- O DR U( :L"F/ RPM MROCK T S,a T.,, AIFIE(D r 3:/ _f • • '-.'fl�l1 a L Pl. CN ' O EOUQ RI O P M'n M Sr I : �y l.�•,, E'lr' !�sP c i t`l DF LIDOEL O R , pL PL ErENIhG Sta.R CT_�� <0,P FN� IO f� y .t'�5 �.�.;}'L.. �J O m `\OO PP CPR 0\. INV •.L .R • 7 -yy77 4 OB\P ,' OP o 00 �� S[/MOM[Nils f O,, ? AO sC, V A.. Fyi�7. „/.. i`A R v o TOTAVI CHIM4 COOL = 6 z< ` �,__J --,e„,.„NEEI<O! l 1 �PrQ \�., r,,i`O:".1 Ec Ipl - - - I MAGEE TROT�t�D • y/Q a d1=♦ ROAD TI HS � N,.- ?. ;ON,'.' R ts,iTo,t f< r a o a A I DR aIu i --- -4-3-FAI.-4DR _<!`./',APB JS,„': `l,•i1. / tw p„,, DR V000N -' MAK IS,. �O 03P a C0,09 B ,J /// MONTEC`KRDXEN PL 9C OV- Cie.:'•+/.;�,%, J Pt OP o 5o "oS �OP JI/ J CELLOB(ACKSI oS) C 1 '‹CP7 ®Op m OQP -AVE [0._ u J It: A,H4t4Y ii„...P AL r ELSEP .n THAM LN ( n 'y,,,` .. �...„ P/ PSO.z'LUNA rS P S l"I I~ < O H LEY1lN 0' W�... �'�4. J O =t C -c. NCA tuAlA6 RICAS T l' 0. �. ! P Q •Pj OL( o C �s C I"� � CA O � CI L E ( !`' //. .Pq DA Pi < �PASE CIE 0 f CO IA R'AGOLA i� 1't PM V z z 4L.DR pMRIDGC DR -�•i��M o y r z ♦tP QI /• lu PSO }If LEST P50 N s,E.P `'5 P(1 CW' _\o Dv ERTO II 1 r Cr-N70►NOY c, n ,Qr I 1 RD >J J>Im' al M1 PL J O OF t ~ zIn s < DR 0 _ WOOD CT< Pl z s�♦. (>O. Q,/ o L.',' ZP OA So S90 0 111 ~ 6 �,. 'CLD ►l EUN CE PL G is.' mP I/\� PO '' s IA PR p00 O*'',1-' P`,O ! `P i S'CAlZA 04 Cross HARELSON Si A z p OM R i= "FA a. L P`-< 'Ot.1 Ain CT .1HS . AM SUFf r0 pP ‹. f IELD lX PETERSON IL �(y,��'` /!l��� P YASSINGAL W '/I - 9 ALTERO DR WOO' s1<Is t•4, ;�oU, o A. CHAPALA i DR YUCCA L,\R w �O/ y• Q 3 SOLERO DR pl ` 1 47 S Q'. Q _ A., PL P 7 'i i 0.-P`tl MORATERO DR -_-_ pLPC p,CO 9 t9 LO i KRIZANo o C J` O I ` < ''P S, J .tPW'!I `6, .' lPM O.R. z CEQ' x DR O DS O P- P (Fhf ..`O ` i C .`.. < a y?ro "o S` O 1 _ C(� s' `LP''./ tIERRA fORTUNA CROWN KING DR P� o (y O AO/y` 1 I R` r J 1 •9/SSF ld/ STELP B'R. pi �r �p 'FOOTHILLS \P c r u S,h OS S's ,a TTA o SAN MARTIN < DR WOPRO`l0 ,P o C.tS'Q�. .IIfY OR / C'I`',Rs l o zo I RYA < PE'` i P AN E r DR Or NEA u,C^ANANCA pi. O P > at '� I/ R GOLD GLO MALL PL P r ': C4NA <eA N.iI t z \M r ,.f o > VISTA a •LAP o 00 S,,/... c'fS N.PL�P ©--A o F 3;' COl ' e P s.w CIR _I; < \`O _o SI E /, OL R Jf/vt? '{ QP o .f S Sq Q.-WAND A.VI IA WV. 4,75. I OGOS,SSP c > OE= N - L, J ie CDP P EE 2 ,- o ' ,i` SAN .14s, ;'..rA 0:P A'P RD ' 7oNOro Cnut V o CP\ . ) ( /l ~\ 1 2 [ J6 � 9(N C•\ u OOID INA RD ♦p ft "' /1 f/:- /N,' INA i ~ Part PYEJ., / •-� 1 DD.rLE.[•DL ROAD L P I flaps,Inc Reproduction Prohibited by Law 752 � N "AR'� ) ¢N- O J 7,, MAIIMILIAN WAY i� I l Z., <I / ,,,,,I,--` 226 I 227 228 1 224 225 oli yr''� xSF",R w; Board of Supervisors Memorandum • 44IZ0�� Subject: Co9-98-43 page 1 of 3 FOR AUGUST 16, 1999 MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ADVERTISED FROM: Jim Mazzocco, Planning Official PUBLIC Public Works-Development Services Department-Planning DivisicHEARING DATE: August 4, 1999 REZONING Co9-98-43 WONG - ORACLE ROAD #2 Request of Walter and Jane Wong, represented by Don Laidlaw and Associates, for a rezoning of 1 .31 acres from SR (Suburban Ranch) to TR (Transitional), located on the east side of Oracle Road, approximately 1/4 mile south of Magee Road. The request lies within and conforms to the Pima County Comprehensive Plan, Co7-89-2. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends APPROVAL (8 - 0, Commissioners Rickles and Spendiarian were absent). Staff recommends APPROVAL. (District 1) IF THE DECISION IS MADE TO APPROVE THE REZONING,THE FOLLOWING STANDARD AND SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED: Completion of the following requirements within five years from the date of rezoning approval by the Board of Supervisors: 1. Recording of a covenant holding Pima County harmless in the event of flooding. 2. Recording of the necessary development related covenants as determined appropriate by the various County agencies. 3. Provision of development related assurances as required by the appropriate agencies. 4. There shall be no further subdividing or lot splitting without the written approval of the Board of Supervisors. 5. Prior to the preparation of the development related covenants and any required dedication, a title report (current to within 60 days) evidencing ownership of the property shall be submitted to the Department of Transportation, Real Property Division. 6. Transportation conditions: A. Provision of all necessary access improvements to Oracle Road as determined by the Arizona Department of Transportation. These improvements shall need the approval of the Arizona Department of Transportation and meet the appropriate standards prior to the approval of any development plan or subdivision plat for any portion of the subject property. B. Written certification from the Arizona Department of Transportation stating satisfactory compliance of all its requirements including approval of the number, the location and the design of all access points to the subject property from Oracle Highway shall be submitted to the Pima County Development Services Department prior to the issuance of any building permits. 7. Flood Control conditions: A. The property owner must dedicate all rights-of-way and/or grant flowage easements for drainage purposes to Pima County, as determined necessary by the Flood Control District during the plan review process. B. Drainage shall not be altered, disturbed or obstructed without the written approval of the Flood Control District. C. All internal drainage improvements and any external drainage improvements required to mitigate drainage impacts caused by the proposed development shall be constructed at no cost to Pima County. 8. Wastewater Management condition: The property owner must connect to the public sewer system at the location and in the manner specified by Wastewater Management at the time of review of the tentative plat, development plan or request for building permit. 9. Adherence to the preliminary development plan as approved at public hearing. 10. The site shall be surveyed for the presence or absence of the cactus ferruginous pygmy owl by a qualified biological consultant who has a permit from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 11. If during construction, materials that may be human remains and associated burial items are discovered, ground disturbing activities in the vicinity of the site will cease, the discovery site will be secured, and the Arizona State Museum will be immediately notified. 12. Uses shall be restricted to professional and semi-professional offices. 13. Building heights are limited to 24 feet and two stories. AND A. All exterior walls and roofs of buildings (unless a roof is screened by a parapet wall extending at least three feet above the building), retaining walls, and accessory structures that are visible from outside the land parcel boundary, shall be earthtone in color that will blend in with the natural setting. Colors shall not exceed a light-reflective value of 60 percent. Mechanical equipment shall be screened and painted to reduce visibility, as recommended by the standards; B. No wall shall be allowed that impedes wildlife movement through natural open space to and from offsite locations; C. No high pressure sodium or mercury vapor lights shall be permitted. All external lighting shall be low intensity, low profile lighting not to exceed 42 inches; D. Before the issuance of any permits a salvage plan for all viable native trees and cacti will be presented to Pima County for review and approval. The plan shall address salvage and relocation on site of all qualified plants that are within the disturbance area and cannot be preserved in place. All newly introduce on site landscape shall be selected from the approved list as outlined in Pima County Resolution 1988-151. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING SUMMARY MEETING OF JUNE 30, 1999 Staff presented information from the attached staff report pertaining to the general character and history of the requests. Staff stated that the two request contained similar characteristics, and could be heard together, but that a separate motion would be required for each. Staff also asked that the four conditions required by the Design Review Committee (DRC) as part of Buffer Overlay Zone (BOZ) review be added to any motion, as well. Co9-98-43 page 2 of 3 The applicant made a presentation, outlining the development characteristics of the site and certain restrictions being proposed. A commissioner asked when a traffic signal would be installed, which is a requirement for the rezoning to the west of Oracle Road. The applicant responded that he didn't know, but that several factors were now considered when determining the need for a traffic signal. Among the new criteria the terms "warranted" and "justified" are used by traffic engineers. A commissioner asked if the area where water flows on to the site is paved. The applicant said no, that it would have to be constructed as part of the development. No one from the public addressed the Commission. The public hearing was closed. On second motion, it was voted 9 - 0 (Commissioner Tickles was absent) to recommend APPROVAL of Co9-98-43, subject to the standard and special conditions, including conditions required by the DRC, as follows: A. All exterior walls and roofs of buildings (unless a roof is screened by a parapet wall extending at least three feet above the building), retaining walls, and accessory structures that are visible from outside the land parcel boundary, shall be earthtone in color that will blend in with the natural setting. Colors shall not exceed a light-reflective value of 60 percent. Mechanical equipment shall be screened and painted to reduce visibility, as recommended by the standards; B. No wall shall be allowed that impedes wildlife movement through natural open space to and from offsite locations; C. No high pressure sodium or mercury vapor lights shall be permitted. All external lighting shall be low intensity, low profile lighting not to exceed 42 inches; D. Before the issuance of any permits a salvage plan for all viable native trees and cacti will be presented to Pima County for review and approval. The plan shall address salvage and relocation on site of all qualified plants that are within the disturbance area and cannot be preserved in place. All newly introduce on site landscape shall be selected from the approved list as outlined in Pima County Resolution 1988-151 . FB/DG/mm Attachments c: Jim Mazzocco, Planning Official Frank P. Behlau, Zoning Administrator Ted Payne, Development Review Janet Russell, Real Property Division, DOTFCD Walter and Jane Wong, Trustees, 5437 East Third Street, Tucson, AZ 8571 1 Laidlaw Consulting, L.L.C., 1735 E. Fort Lowell Road, #10, Tucson, AZ 85719 Co9-98-43 File Book Co9-98-43 page 3 of 3 i L- .: • 4 r- _ --:• .4.- i-F.... s-:,.ik. ---,_:,.., ,..-•,.- f.,,,...4...4,,Q,,,,,,--,-..-„,. :::,-,..,,,..„- . .... ...„. .._,.... . 1 1 . : .•-7..:- z...740,;::: .,,,,,.:.-- 44,,,--,-. --, -.-•,./.",%w1,-,414040,-„,..,:,,:,Eay 464. r i ...-.-....!.......,-,-/A........,„...,47/1 -• -----, --..7-•-.4'4d .1116, //let f V iv :.........1S'i:7i.. ITT1(3'. ......fir.•%13... —‘ ai / ....L.„, -'.... • 1111= .........•MIN,'.....• 'f--r—-----1-"' - 46 ' [--- 1-- .. ....i., ...„.„,,,..../......../ ...... = in ::: As JAL \. ---- \..,1 r EAr"...6.M %ow .....oss --• =1111111*Z. 410111 -'--- / 1 T "b1.r / .. • t 4.11.1 CAI I ' \..• . ! I • . 2t-----C.-- --____h , ' .Z.-='="1 1 '''- II i \--- 1 i i ; ,N,..-•.i..... 1 : k_ ___I---L---1 i 111.11•1 NI* UM 11116IP" ,O.P.'r- mitinTri i I , ILMA, ...1 10s0 , , I I I I Ai r_....01 -- 1° 1 ----, -44 OWE Se. a mg f P NA' r , /.;, .,,,„..,.. 4 , '- i { 1114.111111V ar----7-A.miy ...„ . , i • As. , ,._ , , ,A law r--- 1110,500. , NII, \-_--\--- r ,---c / . / IN - I C30 ' I - i -,--,, 1 '-- / syagrc-rpRopEnraf 1 ___........,i • !, , , .,.......,,.......,./ ; -------- • -. --: ! . • 1 / 1 1 . __ __ . _L_____ ! j___I ......„,. " i I—I ,----III)1.7__._. .:.. -- . • -, . "1- --fr-- -- --- - • . : 1 ! '• I i : H.,--I, ,••1 \ ' ,__F .- -t . )--- __.--• 7 • -'-'•---7s• . • , 0 5 : i , , L -,-- , , ; : ; • • ;_.- ' ,, ; ; I 4!. , .. '. ' !! '• f li Ii ' I - ' ' '; '• '• - 1 ', 1 .-' fi ! 1-1----r--- 1 , ; - 1 \ \ --- .-'t • • i I Tn. ---'--- -I 1 : ! ! i t _4t, , _, -71---1;- 1 ; ; ; .h- ' • ' . ; , . .. . • •- - -- - —..___• • _L.._.,1 _i_ • : _i 1 , . I ' I ....,--- - i• . c- -,..,,, ,-..-,- i • -Iv i i rrn „L....Li ._ ._.__. . . .. ,, . , .,. . , .L....._ , , . __.,..-,,..,i7-. / : , -1 \-- , ;'•-•••, . ; .• . \ -1.,!--1 7 \ '.."' : r-t '1 Jr-77-7 i U \ ,._ \._..' ,,---•! . ' )C.,___,i___ - 1 '"--i 'I ' <'. • ;;e'l ° . • ._ , , , . ,,, \ ,. i. i I.--:.1 '.. -1:1'...., >. • , . . I I .; .,__ __ ______\ 4... .. ......---------.--•••-,. .•-•• 1 ---, i f -..,' 4-- ----Li 4,,„.- .' --- .-•-\it \ ,•-/IN.2 • 1 / 1 • r .2...---,-, . 47 id J.'. ..e_____\''' I : N 1',a4 •--- •, 7 1 ; i —•--I i C ‘.f 4. I i I i . I I • 1 ....,...\ , .... )\- 3 ---1 at's. il, Y• I/ 1 r , z4 4 I* to MOW -1213,30.1-j ---1-17.--11-1-1 . 1 --, - ...A.Ini-T-7-1-1.e I [ il los Mo. / PIMA COUNTY. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN--CATALINA FOOTHILLS SUBREGION DES I GNAT I ON--MEDIUM HIGH INTENSITY* URBAN (MIT IU). • ' 24* R/AC Co9-98-43 Medium/High Intensity Urban a) Purpose: To designate areas for a mix of medium to high density housing types and other compatible uses. b) Objective:These areas provide opportunities for a variety of residential housing types, induding duster option developments, single family attached dwellings, and apartment complexes. Special attention should be given in site design to assure that uses are compatible with adjacent lower density residential uses. c) Residential Gross Density: Only land area zoned and planned for residential use, or natural or cluster open space areas, shall be included in gross density calculations. Natural and duster open space shall be defined as set forth in Section 18.09.040.B, except that cluster open space shall not include land developed under the GC Golf Course Zone. Residential gross density shall comply with the following: 1) Minimum- (none) 2) Maximum-24 RAC d) Zoning Districts: Only the following zoning districts shall be deemed in compliance with the land use plan,except as provided for under Section 18.89.030.A.6 major resort community,Section 18.89.040.A.4 plan policies, or Section 18.90.030.H specific plans: 1) GC Golf Course Zone 2) CR-1 Single Residence Zone 3) CR-2 Single Residence Zone 4) CR-3 Single Residence Zone 5) CR-4 Mixed-Dwelling Type Zone 6) CR-5 Multiple Residence Zone 7) TR Transitional Zone 8) CMH-1 County Manufactured And Mobile Home-1Zone 9) CMH-2 County Manufactured And Mobile Home-2 Zone 10) MR Major Resort Zone 11) CPI Campus Park Industrial Zone CASE NUMBER Co9-98-43 CASE NAME WONG - ORACLE ROAD #2 REZONING STATE OF ARIZONA) § COUNTY OF PIMA) I, the undersigned, hereby certify that on or before July 30, 1999, I mailed/posted "Notice of Public Hearing" on certain zoning petition/master plan, to be held by the: PIMA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. on Monday, August 16, 1999 at 9 :00 a.m. in the Board of Supervisors Hearing Room, first floor Superior Courts Building, Pima County Governmental Center, 110 West Congress Street, Tucson, Arizona. Notices were mailed to the property owner(s) listed on the notification list, petitioner(s) , the agent (s) , unless otherwise noted. The property posted is located on the east side of Oracle Road, approximately 1/4 mile south of Magee Road. d /\‘ MAILING: WUEP.1-- POSTING: E / v1 SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS /1 day of , 1999 1,-41►48, ir.-SrIf wa ors s1+.TslsrtAt metrAi.er esr . am. MARCIA ADAMS if Notary Public c \`' .1 PIMA COt►tM My Comm.Ex;ire Mar.3,2:}fX [g s�'RY'a`f:7Y.M.JN.IY,rr/y!J'.Mi'IEIIC+IO►ilOA✓ld►iY'JY�Yd NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE PIMA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS on MONDAY, AUGUST 16, 1999 at or after 9:00 a.m. in the Board of Supervisors' Hearing Room, First Floor, Superior Courts Building, 110 West Congress Street, Tucson, Arizona, at which time and place all interested persons will have an opportunity to appear and be heard on this matter. Please note that property owners within 300 feet of a proposed rezoning, substantial change or specific plan request may file written approvals or protests of the change at any time prior to the close of the Board of Supervisors' public hearing. If twenty percent (20%), by number and area, of the owners of property within 300 feet of the rezoning, substantial change or specific plan file written protests, an affirmative vote of three-fourth (3/4) of all members of the Board of Supervisors will be required to approve the rezoning, substantial change a gt Ser or vices specific Department,ritten approvals or protests may be filed with the Pima County Develop Planning Division, 201 N. Stone Avenue, 2nd Floor, Tucson, AZ 85701, or with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. This is not a complete agenda and does not reflect the order in which cases will be heard. Please call 740-6800 one week prior to the Hearing for the correct agenda order. Publicly bl c Hearnoticed ng items date may be continued during the Board's meetings. If an item is moved from the noted above to a future date, the new date will be announced at the above noticed meeting. REZONINGS Co9-99-11 MAJUTA - MONTANA STREET REZONING Request of Raymond and Viola Maiuta , for a rezoning of 3.37 acres from SR (Suburban Ranch) to CR-1 (Single Residence), located on Road. west The regde uestf Camino l es within de Oeste, approximately 1,000 feet south of Irvington and conforms to the Pima County Comprehensive Plan, Co7-89-2. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends APPROVAL (9 - 0, Commissioner Rickles was absent). Staff recommends APPROVAL. (District 3) Co9-99-12 ZIEGLER - LAMB DRIVE REZONING Request of Silvia and Erika Ziegler, for a rezoning 1.07 of acres from GR-1 (Rural Residential) to SH (Suburban Homestead), located on the south side of Lamb Drive, approximately 1/4 mile east of Oracle Road and 1/4 mile south of Mainsail Boulevard. The request lies within and conforms to the Pima County Comprehensive Plan, Co7-89-2. It does not conform to the Lago del Oro Zoning Plan (Co13-63-17B), which calls for CMH-2 zoning. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends APPROVAL (9 - 0, Commissioner Rickles was absent). Staff recommends APPROVAL. (District 3) Co9-98-42 WONG - ORACLE ROAD REZONING Request of Walter and Jane Wong, represented by Don CRLaid�1 (Single Residence)aw and Associates, for to a rezoning of 6.47 acres from SR (Suburban Ranch) TR (Transitional), located on the northeast and southeast corners of Oracle Road and Suffolk Drive. The request lies within and conforms to the Pima County Comprehensive Plan, Co7-89-2. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends APPROVAL (8 - 0, Commissioner Rickles and Spendiarian were absent). Staff recommends APPROVAL. (District 1) Co9-98-43 WONG - ORACLE ROAD #2 REZONING Request of Walter and Jane Wong, represented by Don Laidlaw and Associates, for a rezoning of 1.31 acres from SR (Suburban Ranch) to TR (Transitional), located on the east side of Oracle Road, approximately 1/4 mile south of Magee Road. The request lies within and conforms to the Pima County Comprehensive Plan, Co7-89- 2. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends APPROVAL (8 - 0, Commissioners Rickles and Spendiarian were absent). Staff recommends APPROVAL. (District 1) TIME EXTENSION WITH RESOLUTION Co9-92-29 TITLE SECURITY AGENCY TR 163 - SHANNON ROAD REZONING Request of NCH Corporation, represented by MJM Consulting, Inc., for a two-year time extension on the above referenced rezoning from SR to TR encompassing 11.98 acres. The subject site was rezoned in 1992 and is located on the south side of Ina Road, approximately 425 feet west of Shannon Road. Staff recommends APPROVAL. (District 1) DONE BY ORDER OF THE PIMA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS THIS 27TH DAY OF JULY 1999.TELEPHONE: PUBLIC WORKS - DEVELOPMENT SERVICES - PLANNING DIVISION 740-6800. PUBLISH: FRIDAY, JULY 30, 1999. COL13 9-• . Chair Bronson inquired where would they be bicycling to? Mr. Goff responded they can bicycle up to the sports complex or to the recreation facilities in general. Also, there are people who do ride bicycles to work. The Chair inquired whether anyone wished to be heard. No one appeared. It was thereupon moved by Supervisor Eckstrom, seconded by Chair Bronson, and unanimously carried by a five to zero vote, to close the public hearing; to approve Co9-99-20, subject to standard and special conditions. 24 . DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT: REZONING Co9-98-42, WONG - ORACLE ROAD REZONING Request of Walter and Jane Wong, represented by Don Laidlaw and Associates, for a rezoning of 6.47 acres from SR (Suburban Ranch) and CR-1 (Single Residence) to TR (Transitional) , located on the northeast and southeast corners of Oracle Road and Suffolk Drive. The request lies within and conforms to the pima County Comprehensive Plan, Co7-89-2 . On motion, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 8 - 0 (Commissioner Rickles and Spendiarian were absent) to recommend APPROVAL. Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to standard and special requirements. (District 1) "IF THE DECISION IS MADE TO APPROVE THE REZONING, THE FOLLOWING STANDARD AND SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED: Completion of the following requirements within five years from the date of rezoning approval by the Board of Supervisors: 1. Recording of a covenant holding Pima County harmless in the event of flooding. 2. Recording of the necessary development related covenants as determined appropriate by the various County agencies. 3. Provision of development related assurances as required by the appropriate agencies. 4. There shall be no further subdividing or lot splitting without the written approval of the Board of Supervisors. 5. Prior to the preparation of the development related covenants and any required dedication, a title report (current to within 60 days) evidencing ownership of the property shall be submitted to the Department of Transportation, Real Property Division. 6. Transportation conditions: A. Provision of all necessary improvements to Suffolk Drive and Oracle Road as determined by an approved traffic study. These improvements shall need the approval of the Arizona Department of Transportation and the Pima County Department of Transportation and meet the appropriate standards prior to the approval of any development plan or subdivision plat for any portion of the subject property. B. Written certification from the Arizona Department of Transportation stating satisfactory compliance of all its 08-16-99 (35) requirements including approval of the number, the location and the design of all access points to the subject property from Oracle Highway shall be submitted to the Pima County Development Services Department prior to the issuance of any building permits. C. The property owner(s) shall reach a financial contribution and/or construction agreement (Development Agreement) with and acceptable to Pima County Department of Transportation and Flood Control District prior to development plan or subdivision plat approvals. Said agreement shall address required road improvements and/or financial contributions for improvements to area roads impacted by the proposed development. D. Property Owner(s) shall dedicate any necessary right-of-ways from the subject properties needed for the future signalization of the Oracle Road and Suffolk Drive intersection. 7. Flood Control conditions: A. The property owner must dedicate all rights-of-way and/or grant flowage easements for drainage purposes to Pima County, as determined necessary by the Flood Control District during the plan review process. B. Drainage shall not be altered, disturbed or obstructed without the written approval of the Flood Control District. C. All internal drainage improvements and any external drainage improvements required to mitigate drainage impacts caused by the proposed development shall be constructed at no cost to Pima County. 8. Wastewater Management condition: The property owner must connect to the public sewer system at the location and in the manner specified by Wastewater Management at the time of review of the tentative plat, development plan or request for building permit. 5. Adherence to the preliminary development plan as approved at public hearing. 10. The site shall be surveyed for the presence or absence of the cactus ferruginous pygmy owl by a qualified biological consultant who has a permit from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 11 . If during construction, materials that may be human remains and associated burial items are discovered, ground disturbing activities in the vicinity of the site will cease, the discovery site will be secured, and the Arizona State Museum will be immediately notified. Uses shall be restricted to professional and semi-professional offices. 13. Building heights are limited to 24 feet and two stories. AND A. All exterior walls and roofs of buildings (unless a roof is screened by a parapet wall extending at least three feet above the building) , retaining walls, and accessory structures that are visible from outside the land parcel boundary, shall be earthtone in color that will blend in with the natural setting. Colors shall not exceed a light-reflective value of 60 percent. Mechanical equipment shall be screened and painted to reduce visibility, as recommended by the standards; B. No wall shall be allowed that impedes wildlife movement through natural open space to and from offsite locations; C. No high pressure sodium or mercury vapor lights shall be permitted. All external lighting shall be low intensity, low profile lighting not to exceed 42 inches; 08-16-99 (36) D. Before the issuance of any permits a salvage plan for all viable native trees and cacti will be presented to Pima County for review and approval. The plan shall address salvage and relocation on site of all qualified plants that are within the disturbance area and cannot be preserved in place. All newly introduce on site landscape shall be selected from the approved list as outlined in Pima County Resolution 1988-151." * * * Co9-98-43, WONG - ORACLE ROAD MO. 2 REZONINGd by Don Laidlaw Request of Walter and Jane Wong, and Associates, for a rezoning of 1.31 acres from SR (Suburban Ranch) to TR (Transitional) , located on the east side of Oracle Road, approximately 1/4 mile south of Magee Road. The request lies within and conforms to the pima County Comprehensive Plan. Co7-89-2. On motion, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 8 - 0 (Commissioners Rickles and Spendiarian were absent) . rtotanda d a osend p �dpecialAL. Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject requirements. (District 1) "IF THE DECISION IS MADE TO APPROVE THE REZONING, THE FOLLOWING STANDARD AND SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED: Completion of the following requirements within five years from the date of rezoning approval by the Board of Supervisors: 1. Recording of a covenant holding Pima County harmless in the event of flooding. 2. Recording of the necessary development related covenants as determined appropriate by the various County agencies. 3. Provision of development related assurances as required by the appropriate agencies. 4. There shall be no further subdividing or lot splitting without the written approval of the Board of Supervisors. 5. Prior to the preparation of the development related covenants and any required dedication, a title report (current to within 60 days) evidencing ownership of the property shall be submitted to the Department of Transportation, Real Property Division. 6. Transportation conditions: A. Provision of all necessary access improvements to Oracle Road as determined by the Arizona Department of Transportation. These improvements shall need the approval of the Arizona Department of Transportation and meet the appropriate standards prior to the approval of any development plan or subdivision plat for any portion of the subject property. B. Written certification from the Arizona Department of Transportation stating satisfactory compliance of all its requirements including approval of the number, the location and the design of all access points to the subject property from Oracle Highway shall be submitted to the Pima County Development Services Department prior to the issuance of any building permits. 7. Flood Control conditions: A. The property owner must dedicate all rights-of-way and/or grant flowage easements for drainage purposes to Pima County, as determined necessary by the Flood Control District during the plan review process. 08-16-99 (37) B. Drainage shall not be altered, disturbed or obstructed without the written approval of the Flood Control District. C. All internal drainage improvements and any external drainage improvements required to mitigate drainage impacts caused by the proposed development shall be constructed at no cost to Pima County. 8. Wastewater Management condition: The property owner must connect to the public sewer system at the location and in the manner specified by Wastewater Management at the time of review of the tentative plat, development plan or request for building permit. 9. Adherence to the preliminary development plan as approved at public hearing. 10. The site shall be surveyed for the presence or absence of the cactus ferruginous pygmy owl by a qualified biological consultant who has a permit from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 11. If during construction, materials that may be human remains and associated burial items are discovered, ground disturbing activities in the vicinity of the site will cease, the discovery site will be secured, and the Arizona State Museum will be immediately notified. 12. Uses shall be restricted to professional and semi-professional offices. 13. Building heights are limited to 24 feet and two stories. AND A. All exterior walls and roofs of buildings (unless a roof is screened by a parapet wall extending at least three feet above the building) , retaining walls, and accessory structures that are visible from outside the land parcel boundary, shall be earthtone in color that will blend in with the natural setting. Colors shall not exceed a light-reflective value of 60 percent. Mechanical equipment shall be screened and painted to reduce visibility, as recommended by the standards; B. No wall shall be allowed that impedes wildlife movement through natural open space to and from offsite locations; C. No high pressure sodium or mercury vapor lights shall be permitted. All external lighting shall be low intensity, low profile lighting not to exceed 42 inches; D. Before the issuance of any permits a salvage plan for all viable native trees and cacti will be presented to Pima County for review and approval. The plan shall address salvage and relocation on site of all qualified plants that are within the disturbance area and cannot be preserved in place. All newly introduce on site landscape shall be selected from the approved list as outlined in Pima County Resolution 1988-151." Jim Mazzocco, Planning Official, reported the first item is a rezoning request from SR and CR-1 to TR on 6. 47 acres to allow for six separate office buildings. The second item is another rezoning under the same name for one office building about 700 feet to the north of the first site. The Planning and Zoning Commission cases have been reviewed mn staff recommending approval. Both these for buffer overlay standards and both iar . There has been are providing 0 percent natural open space at their neighborhood input on these sites. 08-16-99 (38) Supervisor Boyd stated he understood the neighborhood input was substantial and they basically have agreed and approved the concept, is that correct. Mr. Mazzocco responded that seems to be the case. They have documentation on those meetings which includes discussion about the design issues. Supervisor Boyd inquired if there was any protest? Mr. Mazzocco responded no. Tom Storey, citizen, stated he is a concerned citizen about what takes place in the area northwest of Tucson. He has reviewed the draft site analysis of the Butterfield crossing which includes both of the above items. He found it to be a careful study ch theprotects drainagethe patterns. What he l surroundings, topography and would like to request from the Board of Supervisors is that this site analysis and any plat site plans be included or attached to the approval of this particular project. Chair Bronson inquired if that was normal in this process, or is he asking for something that is not usually done? Mr. Mazzocco responded the condition is that whatever is presented as their Development Plan at the public hearing and it is approved, under their zoning conditions that is what they are held to in the development of their plan. Mr. Storey stated his main concern was to make sure this is done and done correctly. Sometimes, ooncetzonihe ng chhas been approved then things start dropping through s. citizen,Winchester Morey, stated there are two things that should be considered. The first, how many additional daily trips will this bring forth? Secondly, has it been calculated? Mr. Mazzocco responded 1,200 daily trips. Mr. Morey stated this is a State road. What is the engineered capacity of the road, and what traffic is it currently carrying? Mr. Mazzocco responded the capacity is 52 , 000 for Oracle Road, and it is carrying 36, 000 Mr. Morey inquired if it will be necessary to install a traffic light at Suffolk Drive with the office buildings on both corners there? 08-16-99 (39) Mr. Mazzocco responded there is a rezoning condition that talks about the possibility of a traffic light. Mr. Morey stated, again, this is similar to a circumstance near the Casa Adobes office park. Nothing has been preapproved and taken care of prior to this hearing to make sure that this is addressed. Mr. Mazzocco responded there has to be a traffic study done on Oracle Road and Suffolk Drive, and t that ttime o e it will be determined what type of improvements need included to ensure public safety. Mr. Morey stated this a point that he has tried to raise in the past, that sometimes these things are done prematurely. For the safety of thopt°mee, Heasuggested the kind of study should have been done ahead f County policy be changed to make sure that these kinds of interchanges, or possible interchanges, are part of any rezoning request first. The Chair inquired whether anyone wished to be heard. No one appeared. It was thereupon moved by Supervisor o rrBoyd, seconded by Chair Bronson, and carried by a four o vote, Supervisor Eckstrom not present for the vote, to close the public hearing; to approve Co9-98-42 and Co9-98-43, subject to standard and special conditions. 25. RECESS Without objection, the Chair declared a closed captionists recess at 10: 35 a.m. 26. RECMENE The Board of Supervisors reconvened at 10: 50 a.m. All members were present. 27 . DEVELOPMENT NICE DEPARTMENT: TIME EXTENSION Co9-92-294 TITLE SECURITY AGENCY TR 1.63 - SHANNON ROAD REZONING Request of NCH Corporation, represented by MJM Consulting, Inc. , for a two-year time extension on theaaoThe ebve referenced s. rezoning from SR to TR encompassing 11.98 subject site was rezoned in 1992 and is located dfonh the heosouth side of Ina Road, approximately 425 feet n Road. Staff recommends APPROVAL of a rezoning time extension to October 6, 2001, subject to the special conditions. (District 1) 08-16-99 (40) If approved, pass and adopt: RESOLUTION NO. 1999- 177 "Staff recommends APPROVAL of a rezoning time extension to October 6, 2001, subject to the following additional special conditions: 7.b. THE PROPERTY OWNER OF LOT 183 OF THE CASAS ADOBES TERRACE SUBDIVISION SHALL PROVIDE A PUBLIC FLOW-THROUGH SEWER AT THE LOCATIONS DESIGNATED BY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT FOR THE UPSTREAM TRIBUTARY _AREA TO THE SOUTHWEST. 14 . LOT 183 OF THE CASAS ADOBES TERRACE SUBDIVISION SHALL BE SURVEYED FOR THE PRESENCE OR ABSENCE OF THE CACTUS FERRUGINOUS PYGMY OWL BY A QUALIFIED BIOLOGICAL CONSULTANT WHO HAS A PERMIT FROM THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE. THE RESULTS OF THAT SURVEY SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT FOR EVALUATION AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF A MITIGATION PLAN. IF WARRANTED. THE SURVEY SHALL BE CONDUCTED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS (OR GRADING PERMITS, IF APPLICABLE) . O. OUTDOOR LIGHTING ON LOT 183 OF THE CASAS ADOBES TERRACE SUBDIVISION SHALL BE SHIELDED AND DIRECTED AWAY FROM RESIDENTIAL AREAS TO THE SOUTH." Jim Mazzocco, Planning Official, reported this is a rezoning time extension for two additional years on 11.98 acres that is zoned TR. The total would be nine years if this time extension is granted. The original development was a plan for a 300 unit apartment complex. This came before the Board in April of this year to keep the case open as it was due for closure. Due to an inadvertent staff error, the Board kept it open. There has been no protest on this case and staff is recommending approval with the addition of several special conditions. Supervisor Boyd inquired what is considered a more intrusive use, business or apartments? Mr. Mazzocco responded I think there are certain things about offices that make them less intrusive. Supervisor Boyd asked what about traffic? Mr. Mazzocco responded traffic at an office complex can be a little bit heavier, it all depends on how many units there are. Chair Bronson stated the heavier use would be during the day, not evening hours. Supervisor Boyd asked if the Board granted the time extension, did they have the authority to remove the verbiage about building apartments? 08-16-99 (41) Mr. Mazzocco stated he did not believe the Board had the authority at this hearing, it would require a substantial change. They can deny it, or if it is approved, he is not sure if they could make it subject to them coming back for a substantial change for a different use. He said a special condition could be put on the approval of the time extension. Mike Marks, MJM Consulting, Inc. , representing NCH Corporation, the owner of the property, stated the rintent of the developer in the plan that was developed and presented to the neighbors, is for a one story, owner occupied, office complex. Supervisor Boyd inquired if they could put up a two story apartment complex? Mr. Marks responded if the Board approves a time extension, they would not be bound to come back for a substantial change. They would have the flexibility of building a two story apartment complex, however, they will not be doing this. They have had meetings with the neighbors, and Mrs. Trainer representing the homeowner's association, who is present today. Also, he and the architect met with Mrs. Trainer and her husband, as well as Rita Hall, a Commissioner with the Village of Casas Adobes Planning Commission, last week and received a positive response to the proposal. Janice Trainer, homeowner's association representative, stated she was before the Board last April 20. Since that time, they have met with the owners agent and the architect and it was presented that it will be a one story iofoffice ehey complex, owner occupied. Theyf��hon that condition a substantial would approve the extension. F e change will be submitted, and that the homeowners concerns will be addressed. She asked that they be consulted prior to the Board of Supervisors approving the final plan. Supervisor Boyd inquired how does the Boardensure tthat this type of development will be the one proposed r p d nhen hey come back to the Board for modifications of the current zoning? Pete Pearman, Civil Deputy County Attorney, stated he did not see any problem with granting a time extension with a special condition prohibiting the use of the property for apartments, and requiring the owner to come back with a substantial change. This can be done in the special conditions. The only problem was limiting the use of the office building to owner occupied. He believes there will be a general problem with that condition. 08-16-99 (42) The Chair inquired whether anyone wished to be heard. No one appeared. It was thereupon moved by Supervisor Boyd, seconded by Chair Bronson, and unanimously carried by a five to zero vote, to close the public hearing; to pass and adopt Resolution No. 1999-177, subject to the special conditions; further, there will be no two story apartments, it will be a one story office building, and it will come back to the Board for a substantial change if the development is modified. 28 . DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: MODIFICATION OF PLAT WAIVER CONDITIONS Co9-88-13, BEDWELL - BEAR CANYON ROAD REZONING Request of Douglas Rorbach, for a waiver of Condition No's 2 .A and 2 .B of the approved waiver of the platting requirement which require construction of both a public off- site sewer extension and an on-site sewer with flow through for tributary areas and connection to the public sewer system. The subject property is 2.74 acres rezoned to CR-i in 1988 and is located on the east side of Bear Canyon Road, approximately 1. 5 miles north of Tanque Verde Road. Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions. (District 4) If approved, pass and adopt: RESOLUTION NO. 1999- 178 "Staff recommends APPROVAL of the request to waive rezoning condition #2.A and B in order to provide for the possibility of a waiver from the code requirement to connect to the public sewer system if such waiver is granted by the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality, subject to the following: • • • • nt-5 end with cerpn e-i t-i ee ae -pe-ci f-i ed by We st ewe tc r pert apple-cation, 1 be d� ]1y1riII�C.�1iSi��ditZJii1[aZn with the applicable building permits. 08-16-99 (43) ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CONDITIONS: 1. THE PROPERTY OWNERS SHALL APPLY FOR AND OBTAIN AN UPDATED APPROVAL FOR A REQUEST FOR WAIVER FROM SECTION 7.21.037.D OF CHAPTER 7.21 (LIQUID WASTE) OF THE PIMA COUNTY CODE REGARDING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT AN ON-SITE DISPOSAL SYSTEM WHERE A PUBLIC SEWER WITH AVAILABLE CAPACITY IS LOCATED WITHIN 200 FEET OF THE PROPERTY LINE OF THE PARCEL FOR WHICH THE CERTIFICATE IS SOUGHT. ALL PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL LOTS MUST HAVE A MINIMUM AREA OF 43,560 SQUARE FEET. A MAXIMUM OF ONE-HALF OF ADJACENT RIGHTS-OF-WAY OR EASEMENTS MAY BE USED IN THE CALCULATION OF THE AREA. THE AVAILABLE RIGHTS-OF-WAY OR EASEMENTS MUST BE SUITABLE TO ABSORB EFFLUENT; ALL OTHER DESIGN REQUIREMENTS MUST BE SATISFIED. THE SITE SHALL BE SURVEYED FOR SHE PRESENCE OR ABSENCE OF THE CACTUS FERRUGINOUS PYGMY OWL BY A OUALIFIED BIOLOGICAL CONSULTANT WHO HAS A PERMIT FROM THE U_.S. FISH AHD WILDLIFE SERVICE. TWE RESULTS OF THAT SURVEY SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT FOR EVALUATION AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF A MITIGATION PLAN. IF WARRANTED. THE SURVEY SHALL BE CONDUCTED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS (OR GRADING PERMITS, IF APPLICABLE)" Jim Mazzocco, Planning Official, reported this is a modification of a condition placed on a Zoning Plan Platting Waiver. It was in the Aqua Caliente-Sabino Creek Zoning Plan from SR to CR-1, 2 .74 acres. The request is to remove two conditions that require the property owner to connect to a public sewer and allow them to pursue the use of a septic tank. Staff has recommended approval subject to three conditions, including a Pygmy Owl survey. There has been no protest on this case. The Chair inquired whether anyone wished to be heard. Mark Yarnish, citizen, stated his property adjoins this property and wants to know if there had to be a separate septic tank for each residence? Mr. Mazzocco responded there are two units planned. One is a northern lot on 1. 6 acres, and the southern lot is 1. 1 acres. There will be one septic tank per lot. Mr. Yarnish inquired because of the public offsite sewer extension, if that meant they would have to tap into the sewer line? Mr. Mazzocco replied that is what the existing condition states, they have to tap into the sewer line. He directed Mr. Yarnish to contact the Development Review Division at 201 N. Stone, second floor, if he desired further information about his property. They will review his property with him. 08-16-99 (44) O* co4r 81Z0 PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT JUDITH A. PATRICK PLANNING DIVISION PH: (520)740-6800 Director 201 NORTH STONE AVENUE,SECOND FLOOR FAX: (520)623-5411 TUCSON,ARIZONA 85701-1207 August 27, 1999 Walter and Jane Wong, Trustees 5437 East Third Street Tucson, AZ 85711 RE: Co9-98-43 WONG - ORACLE ROAD REZONING On August 16, 1999 the Pima County Board of Supervisors approved your rezoning of 1.31 acres from SR (Suburban Ranch) to TR (Transitional), subject to the standard and special rezoning conditions as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Please note that this rezoning is subject to a rezoning ordinance and a Certificate of Compliance prior to issuance of building permits. If you have any questions about your case, please call the Rezoning Section at 740-6800. For a certified copy of the official action of the Board when the minutes are completed, please call the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors at 740-8449. Sincerely, Frank P. Behlau Zoning Administrator FB/mm c: Lois Berndt, Tucson Electric Power Company, 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 County Assessor's Office, Land Department Ted Payne, Development Review - Transportation and Flood Control Lucia Thurston, Development Review - Wastewater Management Janet Russell, Real Property Division DOTFCD Patricia A. Thomas, Zoning Enforcement Laidlaw Conslting, L.L.C., 1735 E. Fort Lowell Road #10, Tucson, AZ 85719 Co9-98-43 File Chrono File Book NAME/ADDR BOOK-MAP-PARCEL 225 51 O11A TAX AREA 1000 DATE 10/19/99 WONG WALTER & WONG JANE TRUSTEES RECORDING INFO 5437 E 3RD DOC 05552 PG 0750 DATE 062277 TUCSON AZ ZONING INFO CURRENT SR AUTH FLAG 85711 MISC INFO LEGAL DESCRIPTION LD MS 57, 065 MS TYPE F SUFFOLK HILLS N150 ' OF BLK B EXC SWLY COR THEREOF STR 36 T12S R13E FILE ID 1 (RD 5995/1062) MAP/PLAT 13/018 MK AR 011 TBL OOB GRP CD AP99 CENS TR 4706 USE CD 0011 (FORMERLY 203-63-011A) O92DATE OF LAST CHG 032593 PROPERTY ADDRESS VALUE SOURCE: Land 000000 // EXEMPT 0 AUXILARY 0 SECONDARY VALUATION DATA VACANT RESIDENTIAL URBAN SUBDIVIDED CLASS FULL CASH PCNT ASSESSED LAND 00/ 4 0 39, 946 16 . 0 6 , 391 IMPROVEMENTS 00/ 0 0 98 PERSONAL PROPERTY GROSS VALUE TOTALS 39, 946 6, 391 98 LMTD/SCND EXEMPTIONS NET VALUE TOTALS 39, 946 6, 391 PRIOR LIMITED FCV 39, 946 CURRENT LIMITED FCV 39, 946 Today 10/20/99 ♦ ♦ 9 :42 am GUEST• FY• Find Next Prey Exit Nval? 1) lc-1gJct f i ,1-i i,..--.„,,, 01 r. tlyox t. *.,.. y: n T ` .',. • • ''. ..-L:A. ..,z,... ....**7'-F-<-0*,.:'•- -- ,.,,,,,, 12:°: !A ',...,—,,, ,,•••• , ;IL w ,, iF • +� r --,=_.!.•:::' ..,: .';''‘.tt.l';:-..,' I, -,.." , ' ' ' '.4...," l"da' '4,4:0'"":4110# .. •''' :, ..„ t. A> ,7 TRESPASSING . •° ' '� ' MEMORANDUM I 1. .1$IZO14YP PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT - PLANNING DIVISION TO: Lori Godoshian, Clerk of the Board FROM: Jim Mazzocco, Planning Official SUBJECT: November 9, 1999 Board of Supervisors Agenda Material DATE: October 27, 1999 Please place the following agenda items on the Board of Supervisors' November 9, 1999 Hearing Agenda. ADVERTISED ITEMS FOR PUBLIC HEARING REZONINGS: Co9-99-28 WARREN - KLEINDALE ROAD REZONING Request of James Warren, represented by Beau Borboa, for a rezoning of 7.28 acres from SR (Suburban Ranch) to SR-2 (Suburban Ranch Estate), located on the south side of Kleindale Road, approximately 1,000 feet west of Houghton Road. The request lies within and conforms to the Pima County Comprehensive Plan, Co7-89-2. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends DENIAL (8-1, Commissioner Clark voted NAY; Commissioner Membrila was absent). Staff recommends APPROVAL. (District 4) Co9-99-15 GATZIONIS BROTHERS FAMILY PARTNERSHIP/CAB PRODUCE COMPANY -ORANGE GROVE #2 REZONING Request of Gatzionis Brothers Family Partnership, et al., represented by Planning Resources, for a rezoning 10.15 of acres from SR (Suburban Ranch) to TR (Transitional), located on the southwest corner of Orange Grove Road and La Canada Drive. The request lies within and conforms to the Pima County Comprehensive Plan, Co7-89-2. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends APPROVAL (9 - 0, Commissioner Membrila was absent). Staff recommends DENIAL. (District 1) ZONING CODE TEXT AMENDMENTS: Co8-96-01 MODULAR/FACTORY BUILT HOMES An ordinance of the Board of Supervisors of Pima County, relating to zoning; amending the Pima County Code by amending Chapter 18.03 to revise the definition of Factory- Built Building (Modular), amending Chapter 18.07, and amending Chapter 18.09 to prohibit Factory-Built Buildings,other than a caretaker's dwelling associated with a non- residential use, for residential use in the SR, SR-2, CR-1 and CR-2 zones, unless in a subdivision approved for such use by the Board of Supervisors. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends APPROVAL (9 - 0, Commissioner Membrila was absent). Staff recommends APPROVAL. (All Districts) If approved, adopt ORDINANCE NO. 1999- Page 2 Lori Godoshian October 27, 1999 Co8-99-04 NOTIFICATION AREA PROCEDURES FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS (CHAPTER 18.89)SPECIFIC PLANS(CHAPTER 18.901,REZONINGS(CHAPTER 18.91), AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS (CHAPTER 18.97) Proposal to amend Zoning Code Chapters 18.89, 18.90, 18.91 and 18.97 of the Pima County Zoning Code by increasing the area of notification to 1000 feet from the subject property boundary for Comprehensive Plan Amendments, Specific Plans, Rezonings, and Conditional Use Permits, from the RH, GR-1, SR and SR-2 zones. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends APPROVAL (9 - 0, Commissioner Membrila was absent). Staff recommends APPROVAL. (All Districts) If approved, adopt ORDINANCE NO. 1999- UNADVERTISED ITEMS FOR PUBLIC HEARING REZONING ORDINANCES FOR ADOPTION: Co9-98-11 MAJUTA - MONTANA STREET REZONING Owner: Raymond and Viola Majuta (District 3) If approved, adopt ORDINANCE NO. 1999- Co9-98-42 WONG - ORACLE ROAD REZONING Owner: Walter and Jane Wong (District 1) If approved, adopt ORDINANCE NO. 1999- Co9-99-43 WONG - ORACLE ROAD #2 REZONING Owner: Walter and Jane Wong (District 1) If approved, adopt ORDINANCE NO. 1999- Co9-99-21 TUCKER - DOUBLE TJ RANCH ROAD EASEMENT REZONING Owner: Thomas Tucker and Joanne Humphrey (District 3) If approved, adopt ORDINANCE NO. 1999- c: Frank P. Behlau, Zoning Administrator rratis ril APPROVED BY COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR tri_,1 ' ► DENIED BY COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ��IZO�A ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED YES(SEE ATTACHED) NO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR DATE ITEM SUMMARY, JUSTIFICATION& SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: REZONING ORDINANCE FOR ADOPTION Co9-98-43 WONG-ORACLE ROAD #2 REZONING Owner: Walter and Jane Wong (District 1) If approved,adopt ORDINANCE NO. 1999- SCHEDULED FOR THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS' NOVEMBER 9, 1999 MEETING in the Board of Supervisors Hearing Room First Floor, Superior Courts Building 110 W. Congress, Tucson, AZ at or after 9:00 a.m. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL /\/ '\ TOTAL COST TO PIMA COUN .$ N/A FUNDING SOURt N/A HAS FUNDING BEEN APPROVED IN THIS FISCAL YEAR'S BUDGET: Yes No ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARING: Yes X No REQUEST FOR: Action Discussion X Discussion/Action EFFECTIVE DATE: / / TERMINATION DATE: / / BOARD OF SUPERVISOR DISTRICT X 1 n 2 3 4 n 5 All IMPACT: IF APPROVED: The rezoning will be shown on the official zoning map and will be subject to this ordinance. IF DENIED: The rezoning will remain conditionally approved but not shown on the official zoning map. AGENDA ITEM INITIATED BY: Don Laidlaw Date: 10/27/99 DEPARTMENT NAME: Public Works- Development Services Department- Planning Division DIVISION MANAGER'S SIGNATURE: Frank P. Behlau,Zoning Administrator DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR'S SIGNATURE: Jim Mazzocco, Planning Official CONTACT PERSON: Frank P. Behlau PHONE# 740-6800 PROCESSING PERSON: Monica Molina 41,,,71741.,,q, R „ b Board of Supervisors Memorandum� =ri� ovie Subject: Co9-98-43 page 1 of 1 FOR NOVEMBER 9, 1999 MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM: Jim Mazzocco, Planning Official Public Works-Development Servic s Department-Planning Division DATE: October 27, 1999 REZONING ORDINANCE FOR ADOPTION Co9-98-43 WONG - ORACLE ROAD #2 REZONING Owner: Walter and Jane Wong (District 1) If approved, adopt ORDINANCE NO. 1999- OWNER: Walter and Jane Wong 5437 E. Third Street Tucson, AZ 85711 AGENT: Don Laidlaw and Associates 1735 East Fort Lowell Road Suite 10 Tucson, AZ 85719 DISTRICT: 1 FB/mm Attachments c: Jim Mazzocco, Planning Official Frank P. Behlau, Zoning Administrator Ted Payne, Development Review Janet Russell, Real Property Division, DOTFCD Walter and Jane Wong, 5437 E. Third Street, Tucson, AZ 85711 Don Laidlaw, 1735 E. Fort Lowell Rd. Suite 10, Tucson, AZ 85719 Co9-98-43 File Book F. ANN RODRIC �, RECORDER D ET: 11173 RECORDED BY: ae,B !li•tnPAGE; 651 DEPUTY RECORDER /1( NO. OF PAGES: 5 2012 R045 ( "i}i° SEQUENCE: 19992190205 P0230 \�D i 11/15/1999 PIMA CO CLERK OF THE BOARD 14: ORDIN 13:20 PICKUP TUCSON AZ 85701 PICKUP AMOUNT PAID $ 0.00 ORDINANCE 1999- R7 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA; RELATING TO ZONING; REZONING PROPERTY (TAX CODE 225-51-011A) IN CASE Co9-98-43 WONG - ORACLE ROAD #2 REZONING; LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ORACLE ROAI , APPROXIMATELY 1/4 MILE SOUTH OF MAGEE ROAD; AMENDING PIMA COUNTY ZONING MAP NO. 116 . BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA: Section 1. The 1. 31 acres described on the attached rezoning ordinance map, which amends Pima County Zoning Map No. 116, are hereby rezoned from SR to TR. Section 2 . Rezoning Conditions. 1 . Recording of a covenant holding Pima County harmless in the event of flooding. 2 . Recording of the necessary development related covenants as determined appropriate by the various County agencies . 3 . Provision of development related assurances as required by the appropriate agencies. 4 . There shall be no further subdividing or lot splitting without the written approval of the Board of Supervisors . 5 . Prior to the preparation of the development related covenants and any required dedication, a title report (current to within - 60 days) evidencing ownership of the property shall be submitted to the Department of Transportation, Real Property Division. Co9-98-43 Page 1 of 5 r 6 . Transportation conditions : A. Provision of all necessary access improvements to Oracle Road as determined by the Arizona Department of Transportation. These improvements shall need the approval of the Arizona Department of Transportation and meet the appropriate standards prior to the approval of any development plan or subdivision plat for any portion of the subject property. B. Written certification from the Arizona Department of Transportation stating satisfactory compliance of all its requirements including approval of the number, the location and the design of all ac :ess points to the subject property from Oracle Highway shall be submitted to the Pima County Development Services Department prior to the issuance of any building permits. 7 . Flood Control conditions: A. The property owner must dedicate all rights-of-way and/or grant flowage easements for drainage purposes to Pima County, as determined necessary by the Flood Control District during the plan review process. B. Drainage shall not be altered, disturbed or obstructed without the written approval of the Flood Control District . C. All internal drainage improvements and any external drainage improvements required to mitigate drainage impacts caused by the proposed development shall be constructed at no cost to Pima County. 8 . Wastewater Management condition: The property owner must connect to the public sewer system at the location and in the manner specified by Wastewater Management at the time of review of the tentative plat, development plan or request for building permit . 9 . Adherence to the preliminary development plan as approved at public hearing. 10 . The site shall be surveyed for the presence or absence of the cactus ferruginous pygmy owl by a qualified biological consultant who has a permit from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service . Co9-98-43 Page 2 of 5 11 . If during construction, materials that may be human remains and associated burial items are discovered, ground disturbing activities in the vicinity of the site will cease, the discovery site will be secured, and the Arizona State Museum will be immediately notified. 12 . Uses shall be restricted to professional and semi-professional offices . 13 . Building heights are limited to 24 feet and two stories. 14 . All exterior walls and roofs of buildings (unless a roof is screened by a parapet wall extending at least three feet above the building) , retaining walls, and accessory structures that are visible from outside the land parcel boundary, shall be earthtone in color that will blend in with the natural setting. Colors shall not exceed a light-reflective value of 60 percent . Mechanical equipment shall be screened and painted to reduce visibility, as recommended by the standards . 15 . No wall shall be allowed that impedes wildlife movement through natural open space to and from off-site locations. 16 . No high pressure sodium or mercury vapor lights shall be permitted. All external lighting shall be low intensity, low profile lighting not to exceed 42 inches. 17 . Before the issuance of any permits, a salvage plan for all viable native trees and cacti will be presented to Pima County for review and approval. The plan shall address salvage and relocation on-site of all qualified plants that are within the disturbance area and cannot be preserved in place. All newly introduced on-site landscape shall be selected from the approved list as outlined in Pima County Resolution 1988-151 . Section 3 . Time limits, extensions and amendments of conditions. 1 . Conditions 1 through 17 shall be completed by August 16, 2004 . 2 . The time limit may be extended by the Board of Supervisors by adoption of a resolution in accordance with Chapter 18 .91 of the Pima County Zoning Code. 3 . No building permits shall be issued based on the rezoning approved by this Ordinance until all conditions 1 through 17 are satisfied and the Planning Official issues a Certificate of Compliance. Co9-98-43 Page 3 of 5 4 . The rezoning conditions of Section 2 may be amended or waived by resolution of the Board of Supervisors in accordance with Chapter 18 . 91 of the Pima County Zoning Code. Section 4. The effective date of this Ordinance shall be on the date of signing of this Ordinance by the Chair of the Board of Supervisors . Passed and adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Pima County, Arizona, this day of , 1999 . -----___:-- Vct—t-a-,-‘, &tyy\--„eyr\ NOV 09 1999 Chair, Board of Supervisors Date ATTEST: I. -,-,. Clerk, `Boa• rd f._ Supervisors I '..,.---. -'' ___ . , ),,_____ . ,. _. _ Deputy County Attorney x cutive Sec t ry, nning and o g Commission Co9-98-43 Page 4 of 5 AMENDMENT NO. 66 BY ORDINANCE NO. 1999-82 TO PIMA COUNTY ZONING MAP NO. 116 TUCSON, AZ. PORTION OF BLOCK B OF SUFFOLK HILLS OF SEC. 36, T12S R13E. NI%-11 ADOPTED 11-09-99 EFFECTIVE 11-09-99 0 400' it I I 1 t l , , I 26 25 0 35 36 h MAGEE RD a ' R 12S R13E 0 III lare"1111 i O 1,0• I O CT a 2 aftsisisftft 1111 CB- 2OO' N o IF IMMO 0 in a a im S1/11 R3-.0.:-.1 30 0 7,Q4 G �,a 29Q__ s ` NDEL °• Z SRtoo. _, W © 11 2 c. T 0 000 • 1 \ \ \ Y51. o SR I _____.__ _, NNA 4 EXECUTIVE ECRETARY, PIMA COUNTY ING AND ZONING COMMISSION © NO BUILDING PERMITS WITHOUT CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FROM SR 1.31 ac± C09-98-43 C07-98-05 xa-OCTOBER 6, 1999 BK 13 PG 18 REF. 225-51-011A 1 4- ,e-.a 5 .�� y,a- - Y 1t T • �,g,f .t �',S. x - r ,+ ..S;o+,l- 9 34' ,-,,,"off-, '6` .(a• • f.:¢ V '0R`7a+r.!tWv:_. f.# .il i} > _iiii, , . 7*_ r i �R. _i K v �,SF' A .€ 0. ,r ,�." . i Aritir- a ]11�-fl. (.. 1. " :i'ti .Y R a .. •'t R a4?f ' :6 ±i'S .i.ie,; , w �...- ti j,. =.,k,.., )e} £... fy.y'�2tyy1 ;+,w y;•x C ' dr 4 ii -. " -- c's ki,* 'VW ; . -,, s ' .4.— ,i i'1%/1‘\„‘. 4.* ‘. ' , *. ' 't , ' --* i' 'Am.'flal-Hk1- ' .'-' l'z'l:11'4 , '11 ,4 i' . ' .i4 - % - • y�j 4`9k. 3"' .Y� ^l'' a!Nat' �,•< ..' ? 2.r . WA- 9 " 1111rit ' 4.,. f 3 key a7 a 1. I Ii" 1 h .1 9; ry� �T4 fR \ =lY' i M' 7 1 +u . .t ?• ,W. A. "'' e v� 'hLv'• . 440 .'Yy?,; to ..,. to,. -•. C 4,.. !' 'sM�` ,/ r r ew. l4� I. ,. -. ', +�4!At: �.: a w ! .-,..Y .s' • A�k ` . .:;„ , ,,.. a5iw� 'k, "dF'. :iky .r Y '`'R ,tom r' r.. a -L • i g$�py. C'a A+ ,r.i .-,,?, _gp� 1,..- '. ,.... it.,,,•'. \- 41..-- ' ,, � �,.", .sue Il'z'' _ •� N� t0.r X'r -c t s"�+y -•"+ w�. ,- ,r-r AT' ' •...-'J o,r'''''"..‘t,,d.''-' ..F. „ . , , ' ! pi ,,-, , .., .:, , ,,,; . .t.,, , 7.,,,,77. '-' t,-,,N"•,.. .....,. _ —-,,-- ,,.„,,e, ...J .. , .,,...,. ,.,,,, ,, ,,.., .. „,,,..,., 04. ,. , _,. .„ ''t. . - �,.. = i. c + Ewe ',` 4,-,- +'. F e �r ). .t^ �� vv.:,.. +,t . :h _,�' '.,Yi i1•�' io �,, „ r,d a .a0 . ,:t. - rii. } �.r - {�44 _:-r fi' t °v u „ y • ky:. "c i y�''i r• " If;i. :.y ,e�;A r R '. ., ..t ' + t � h 'ry.'. y r�- f. V f `�`"�Y '# '�'" 13 .. '' . .... . . .:i 1} ~..'.c V Z •yam , q tA�"' '� -r, r }' t _ r d! 3 � ai Tl� yy_;. , I k;, r i q 'r y.�,r,,.sxi t ??* aw r ... ,.... a .of 1� �t Ax•w. e�`k =�' �'y 3_-S` � ,Y�'i` r . � - �,i0 S ''a «1:t 4�`'� �y :�'! iY"���•,�*t''., .Ca r� _ y f NF y `. TM 4 h,Y • ix.. . ' S:. - f %• Y ` 'v.4 B •c,' . v. . g 4• . {I y Yr. i'. :r 1 T t A ,1 +rkd..f^k"F a �t.w. r R - , ,,-.,,, - -4,-,,,,„, I '.. ,,.3*. ,4-• ,'' MN ''„.0, , ,,.. ,.. _.,, ....., s i'T rt V M F iiiiot. �. t f • 1 +� T el I r yy a. • ♦y�' .1) Y� '_+ � : � �` ..u♦ ]#f i, ' Y � 11•y¢} I �'� Y A :7. � e.�� +,w �= yTw,m_�� � 'iy�*�' - � ,�s k �y AA'. x '�: 4°'�►5 tiAk �_M'�t�` .in ,�`� Y 4?,:�' i. •.k ;'a ,, ,,,. _ {,',"�`�'. '.11 '?G i. " }.! - . �1 _.',1' _ Z` X}'"r � �..�11 .M 'w.. ,t. f r � '�S a 411....4 � yIi+p� f �.iyi y-1. �'1���' F �� * Tf �f ��1'`•— 1iF r 'jt , *,', 4 �.:� �z.�_�""• 6 _� - s',Y ,fit t�Y .r t +^y.:LM -- - '.r am.t'? 'f ::' : ' 4 ', • Iyt� ' ‘w" xx .w 141 k �4 y' � s � a ! ,a. t9 k it I.:.. ..ita m.*K F , 4 $ `f 'n.f i • t. r t R4,_ ' M "?,. - %Air.' , � "Nr- eJ 'r, rrter f ' -*�' %�. a 'r � V Ggr+ s *.r '4?I�ya,y °�w ; .Z� . w� 3� `4 Ir `7k, '. # . �"�aa 4 _ ,�$' � � � - 7�iy- ,+ - t.: .e."? v � - . 44�iry�. 4:xr,i• r^a w ; r. • 1. , ,- `4; ,..tr n ' ' : , .. ' -..- :Ir.. ..e.',,,!. ''.,":3.',4'... 7`.4e..,''s-.11t: . _.t. - r -,' - , :7, ,1 to • 'a. ,•,. +Q i : "4't' "1 �>I! i a '. tfe -itir Y� y w r �£• �+ *' i ' ._`: s wy i �+Z t. ., r +5$ of .a M, i -- *4,,r•'i. t,5..: �L ir' # t ' :4.,„1 F . Y .K_ :,M ; - t, h ,�• a A{ -.' �,y4,,k�F + ♦♦'G ... ,mil Y „-Y.•/:'"'3 .* If iit.„, iT P 5 if, — , ay!i� s'b' '. 't •S `A F.2 T# - J a , r •fitt� ,. �` 1s1 '� C09-98-43 Wong - Oracle Road Rezoning 3199