Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOV50708 ORO VALLEY PUBLIC ART REVIEW COMMITTEE REGULAR MEETING MONDAY AUGUST 6, 2007 HOPI ROOM, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUILDING 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE CALL TO ORDER at or about 4:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Review and approval of the July 16, 2007 Public Art Review Committee Meeting minutes. REGULAR AGENDA 1. OV5-07-08, Harpold Real Estate LLC., represented by Wilda Metzdorf, requests approval of public art for the Vistoso Memorial Chapel, located at 2285 E. Rancho Vistoso Boulevard. A public art proposal has been submitted for review. If you have any questions about this matter, please contact Pamela J. Pelletier, OV Planner, at 229.4813 or ppel letier@orovalley.net. 2. OV5-07-06, Matthew Moutafis, representing Oro Valley Public Works Department, requests approval of public art for the La Canada Road widening project, located between Naranja Drive and Tangerine Road. A public art proposal has been submitted for review. If you have any questions about this matter, please contact David Ronquillo, OV Senior Planner, at 229-4817 or dronquillo@orovalley.net 3. OV5-07-05, Novak Environmental Inc., representing Ventana Medical Systems, requests approval of public art, located on the southeast corner of Innovation Park Drive and Vistoso Village Drive. A public art proposal has been submitted for review. If you have any questions about this matter, please contact David Ronquillo, OV Senior Planner, at 229-4817 or dronquillo@,orovalley.net STAFF REPORT ADJOURNMENT "Notice of Possible Quorum of the Oro Valley Town Council: In accordance with Chapter 3, Title 38, Arizona Revised Statutes and Section 2-4-2 of the Oro Valley Town r r To: TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PLANNING &ZONING DIVISION 11000 N. LA CANADA DR, ORO VALLEY AZ 85737 Phone: (520) 229-4800 Fax: (520) 742-1022 Date: August 8, 2007 Topic: Additional information regarding Vistoso Memorial Chapel Resubmittal of OV5-07-08 to Oro Valley PARC Meeting of September 4, 2007 From: Images in Copper Wilda Metzdorf 825-1639 Attention: Pamela Pelletier or Debbie Moran The attached material is to comply with the request made by the Oro Valley PARC at their August 6, 2007 meeting. The artwork was approved and there were questions about placement on the building. The attached materials were requested to better explain this information. These materials need to be distributed to the PARC in time for their September 4, 2007 meeting when they will make the final recommendation regarding this Public Art Proposal for the Vistoso Memorial Chapel project. You will find ten (10) packets containing each of the following items. This cover sheet 11 x 17 Elevations showing locations of the artwork as previously submitted 11 x 17 Landscape and Bufferyard Plans showing the location of the artwork 81/2 x 11 Expanded View A. showing details of artwork on South Entry 81/2 x 11 Expanded View B. showing details of artwork on West Entry. Reference: is made to in the expanded view documents to Designs#1 and Design#1A. Theses designs were submitted in the original submittal and we were told to not re- submit them. rAUEIMED G - 9 2007 Town of Oro Valley TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Page 1 of 2 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: October 3, 2007 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: Pamela J. Pelletier, Planner SUBJECT: OV5-07-08, Harpold Real Estate LLC, represented by Wilda Metzdorf, requests approval of public art for the Vistoso Memorial Chapel, located at 2285 E. Rancho Vistoso Boulevard. PUBLIC ART REVIEW COMMITTEE (PARC) RECOMMENDATION: The Public Art Review Committee reviewed the proposal on August 6, 2007 and August 16, 2007. The Committee voted unanimously to recommend approval of the public art. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Summary: The artwork consists of two designs (please review attached Public Art submittal for further information): 1. One design consists of two individual art pieces of fused glass flowers and leaves mounted on patina copper branches. This design is to be located on the north and south sides of entrance located on the western elevation. This design is approximately seven feet wide by two feet high. 2. The second design is the same concept, but a smaller size and shape, as well as two individual art pieces. These art pieces will be placed on the south sides of the main entrance on the southern elevation. Each piece is approximately four feet wide by four and one-half feet high. The art is proposed to be located on two elevations of the building. A minimum of$9,722.21 is required for this project based on an estimated construction cost for the building shell at $972,221.82. The proposed artwork will cost approximately$10,000.00. Current Site Conditions: • The site has been graded and building has commenced. • The 2.6 acre site is designated Rancho Vistoso PAD C-1, Commercial District. • The site is located at the northeast corner of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard and Vistoso Commerce Loop. To further orient, the site is west of Oracle Road and the Northwest Medical Center Urgent Care Facility and south of the future Vistoso Commerce Plaza. Proposed Improvements: • The proposal entails a memorial chapel with a crematorium—the total square footage is 14,177. Approvals to Date: • Town Council approved the development plan on November 1, 2006. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Page 2 of 2 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: October 3, 2007 • A Minor Land Subdivision was approved May 4, 2006. STAFF REVIEW: The proposed art meets the one percent (1%) of construction cost requirement for the site. As required by Section 27.3, the art work will be available for public viewing more than 40 hours a week. PROS and CONS: Pros: 1. The proposal meets the requirements of the OVZCR. 2. PARC recommended conditional approval. Cons: 1. None. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Public Art submittal. SUGGESTED MOTIONS: The Town Council may wish to consider one of the following suggested motions: I move to [approve, approve with conditions, OR deny] OV5-07-08, request for approval of public art for Vistoso Memorial Chapel, as requested by Harpold Real Estate LLC, represented by Wilda Metzdorf. ) 7A.,( S ah S. More, aiming and Zoning Director Jer Wats Assistant Town Manager David Andrews, Town Manager cc: Beverly R. Harpold, Revocable Trust 825.2322 &Fax: 825.2237 F:\OV\OV5\2007\0V5-07-08 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PLANNING&ZONING DIVISION 000 N.LA CANADA DR,ORO VALLEY AZ oz Phone:(520)229-4800 Fax:(520)742-1022 APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC ART REVIEW NOTE: PUBLIC ART REVIEW COMMITTEE(PARC)MEETS THE 15r MONDAY OF THE MONTH '%)/ DATE: June 15, 2007Sep OV CASE NO.: (office use only) ` To �Zo PROJECT:Vistoso Memorial Chapel �� f �� O LOCATION:2285 E. Rancho Vistoso Blvd,Oro Valley AZ 85755 of// APPLICANT:Harpold Real Estate,LLC ADDRESS: 65255 E.Emerald Ridge Drive,Tucson AZ 85739-1434 PARCEL NUMBER:223-02-017N TELEPHONE NO.:_520-825-2322 FAX NO.:520-825-2237 PROPERTY OWNER:Harpold Real Estate,LLC ADDRESS:65255 E.Emerald Ridge Drive,Tucson,AZ 85739-1434 PHONE NO.: 520-825-2322 PROJECT ARTIST:Wilda Metzdorf—Images in Copper APPROVED BY: 13t Z/DRB/BOA ADDRESS: 63670 E.Squash Blossom Ln.,Tucson,AZ 85739 0 PHONE:520-825-1639 A A SIGNATURE: lFi` `GL frtTt L` L. NOTE:This application must be accompanied by the following to be deemed complete: • Eight(10)copies of the Development and Landscape Plans, 11"x 17"in size,each to include the exact location of the public art • Eight(10)copies of colored renderings or photographs,8.5"x 11"in size,with discernable dimensions.Each side of the public art must be depicted.. • Eight(10)copies of the Artist's Biography • One(2)copy of the Building Construction Bid • One(2)copy of the Artist contract that specifies total cost of the fmished piece. • One(2)copy of Structural Engineering Specifications,if necessary. • Fees • Please note:A re-submittal will be due for Town Council meeting and we will need 28 copies of the Development Plan, Landscape Plan,colored renderings,artist biography,construction bid,artist contract.See calendar for submittal dates. Applications will not be accepted without all required materials. SUBMITTALS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AT LEAST 14(FOURTEEN)CALENDAR DAYS IN ADVANCE OF THE DESIRED PARC MEETING DATE. CMU SCREEN ALK ; !i :d s�� Ocaa+6r,� /�� .� N�v-s . , / ,raci um erd ophlu36 box O / 41 Zoning PAD lo Verde �� S UCT R �� Cercidium microph_yltum (17) 24" box V 041010-1"•"-;&\ �� •���� � /• / ;�� � S UCTURE � O Foothills Paloerde C � �\\ � � " �� 1 �, ` �� Cercidium microphy�lum (12) TOS- A ,�01 �,�'� . �i� J :" 46'- \ �� Foothills Palo erde Cmetiiiitie ,• „�,_�� / . , • / � 40L iloma thornberi i N. Feather Tree �5) 15-gal. - 0 r r� �A�� \ Irr \` �� orfri � Prosopis velutina (1} TOS n C „t. �n4 ♦ W to oT•"04„�, C 41• *, �� �. p, 72:17;11411Piti _ Velvet Mesquite u.� � N- � Prosopis glandulosa (7) 15—gal. .p p.14 -,'�'' �f �``�.0,�0illi. ■• • O ► : ,'�,�� ' Honey Mesquite �y.: W= 1 ���� See: Ex anded View : ' p_y \ /. • '','\ W WALL I 'v 1 Z CNI (I .� ,, I • s• ""�`� 3'-(� BERM y� � � .,� - I :°111, SHRUBS ,�',�ii I O I Acacia greggii (1) TOS`='�� ► �� i � ; WALL ' ® CatClawAcacia(�� ,`,, ( ) gal.. 0 fil � _ ,,�t , ' ;='�" �`. � C��•� �o O Calliandraerio hylla 32 5-,. p tv�s>� l''0 , / O/ ii f� Pink Fairy Duster �'� �• \ O�' / / F CLOSING ■ Celtis pallid° (1) 5-g O c �� 10 0 ) SELF LATCHING © 17It O Desert Hackberry (3) TOS `�• \ `\`1 / \a 1 \ -C O in .: ® �c, GATE fir.O . ••T ` O \ `c 0 / �• •.* O Turpentine Bush 91 5-gal. ; O Ericameria larcifolia ( ) \ C) `_ •\`i , I`f0. �� ��� p • • AO .. p Salvia greggii (63) 1-gal. " \ .� O i►Oj. ,- .0 • i •� `.O, Autumn Sage \ � •. . �e • 1 •ice o• . * �� obtusifolia (1) TOS Z \\ O , �O� , -Ep 'ASH ��>° � Ziziphus " O ENCLOSURE CMU v Zizi hus 8" CMU SCREEN WALL Rio' i o p • \ ♦ •,.c:, ,� +3-6 HT. TYP. �a �� < �oo WALL +6 i-0" •T• • ��� A �� �o •� - SEE DETAI 1ACCENTS (59) 5-gal. Q- ,�, \ , �� 4t,,,,,,, �I THIS SHEET` OFFSITE OLp // �� ' i; ",ii, /AlpVivi +e Agave huachucensis • O O \`` �` \ / Huchual Agave 0 \ 2 FLOW �000 / ✓ �� \ O\ 0 Carnegie° gigantea (2) TOS 0 ..\ �`•� • \ ��xx-PASS �O� , \\� tX'i y Saguaro - ai. \ O ' STRI ljAGE - ` I ' o%� frutescens (14) 5 g \ O �� STRI IC T1 tC7C / �0lie ' \.\: 00�0 ,� Dales Sierra Negro U �" •.• � // Off\ , " C S�" EN WALL i Black Dales d View A- 'Tilly ► - P ' X ands O -1- /6 H /TY , f n` See. E p IOW I 1 ' .r� 4 5- al. W w \ • • • \ v o, OiOp O , 1� 4 O ' i6) / Alb 1� Das* blesert Spoon ion l (6 ) g •0 LL \ Rio O o 0 0_ ` 4 ri ids 18) 5-gal. 0 \� �\ \ , Irk°-" `c0 ' *o ' O� I • . j/, "eV :! enii ( _ E• WALL0, • ,• . (18TOS rel Cactus (�� \ �. +3-6 HT. TYP. te W Ca \ ` ' 'j OO Hespe loe ctuslora (41) 5-gal. C O\, \� , , 110: ,N , #' ! Nolina microcarpa (48) 5-gal 015 1�' Beargross 0 \ • , PROVIDE HEAVY DUTY 0 LU \\\ , 4010 /4,/ • PIN HINGES(2)EACH a. \ \\` \ NN . \, .'' 1 ODi PER DOORNGES 0 6" GROUND- O U t \ \ • , �,�i, WELD HI COVER Rosmarinus officinalis _�� I /, l• BOLLARDS- GATE (38) 1 gal. �\ • '� • fr." WITH LOCK, 'Prostratus'\\ �\ ") •\` '�' O I LATCH I I Trailing Rosemary \ ' 011.., „*1/./„. I '� •' a entachaeta 82 1- al.\ \ ♦ /�'' �r� I ,' j a • Dyssodl p. ( ) g Z � � D sodla' `• ', �' ���' / 1 • a e SITE \ \ \�` `� 18/� �,,� t �I+ ' \ WALL NG 0 Lantana montevidensis (66) 1—gal.� �, .� z WALL "White.,���: e 0`O � � bOtgeAr. � ° ° � ,, Trailing Lantana L \\ A. pFrplO �/ " o . ° e.. 3. _ `ood�eop /i� \�+� O� ���� `� / • !� ; Zoning 6 TUBULAR STEEL ° a. '. ��J„t *'i O.n�� �� � O • 1¢ ���� � ,i I SUPPORTS WITH METAL\,S �� • O ` •• .. t' PAD T ` 10' MIN. ( a n KAREN M. 1 \ O ., *O,� ��Kr* —Mgr*?ie a CAP SET IN 16" DEEP I I I CESARE di \ 4A ,. .\ 1t O ,• t /. THICKENED SLAB EDGE. , C ••a ypj 01 ;.\ O..,, n �\ • 0� c4 „ � .�=:_` WITH A I-1.5' SPACE(TYP.) I z IpN 410, TE ,���� -_� BASIN 6•PIPE BOLLARD I I - �j -\ ft �.I�I�I��\ BL (TYP.) I 5 YARD TRASH BY o '� \f� �� ,�.-_�.-s"-.• �\ ::::" : ,JPB,EBA �� \\ f� •l \ 5" THICK CONCRETE SLAB ____r___ fSW,JPB,EBA =GEN D 11/11P �� ��..' sco PAD -—�--i VISTOSO MEMORIAL CHAPEL CHECKED BY: lvac \ \ - DATE: APR 2006 \ s 0 �� TRASH ENCLOSURE NEW BUILDING CONSTRUCTION _ Masonry Wall, see Civil Plans ` MASONRY WALL SEE Portion of Section 29,T-11-S,R-14-E,G&SRM • O ' DETAIL 5/C1.2 6" PIPE BOLLARDS' ,JOB NO.: 05113 Town of Oro Valley,Pima County,Arizona 16�9" Scale:1"=25'-0" SHEET NUMBER 0 Preserve in Place plant from NPPO \ O / (J� _ - (Tree unless otherwise noted) \� '\ Contour Interval:1' I S_1 \ GATE SHALL BE SELF CLOSING & SELF—LATCHING pate;July 20,2006 I L.V 1 �1 10 0 20 40 \ 1 TRASH ENCLOSURE DETAIL • ; 2 `� .� N.TS. OV12-05-35 zig ALE: 11= 20'-0"vir-%...; �`_/ PLANS FOR GOVERNMENTAL PROCESSING ONLY. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION. • .__._._..-.tea...._ tit e.c! v. j [Des% vl y A Q O ® 0 0.61LL © E'1 ® F 4r)0C OH T K.2 ��3 1 FIT. J'.�` ��,I" 1 I I ram_I I I I 23'4 4__ 2285 T.O.CNV� i 1 j ,. _ II IIlatP11P1r1441d14411t111111ir 114rII411i1♦ 11 ❑ B q1 I I It 1441NIIplIIll ilifl I:innnnluuuunm umn tannnnnllnluu11111 un llanl iinnnnn r,uulnnlmn 11 auuuulnnruln.a. 2• 3 1/2. -• yid 111u1.4t11 I'4r11d1g4 PPPA III gVgg44q11ptlquqqp.nnuqq4q ly1444q r11144t11J:4r1414y41PIg4r11141I1Plq.�� I ,Iiiliiiinilluiiiiiiiliirinunnnlgmlurnnli uuln,.nlu1111u1111ernnnlumurnlu unlalan uuln�uuulu,ur Inlllggquur111ug101pqp �31 1/2" —Ii14111p.11111gI1It111111Y1 LI11111r11IIIIIII.Ill•Ir111411.11ItIt1111I11.11.11111,1111J1t111t1t1 II11111r1111111r111it111111r11r,11Iy1111111111r1r111111111r11111111111y114r1��. • i tl Pii1�141pI1I11111111114p1111i11111/IY111tI1111114111111y1tt141I11111111111111111111p1111111IIb1111r1111.1.111:�- � •11111111111 IIIIIIIIttIIltltt111111111111III.11111111It1tt111111111111r1t111411111111r1��� =i1Alllill11111114r1111111114411411411111ir1111111UI1111t11111gt111111V111411rIrIlIt1111111111111111A111111:1tr11111111f�•" �.,111Ir111111111,r11.11.1111,11t111111141111111111411.1111111111111111111114111111r1t1111114�:+. ,_a• --14 llr1111111111IIIIItIrlllllt111tIt111t1111t1111r:1111111111111.1y111111111I111t111N1111114r:1I111I1111111111,11tItI11 1° :'''r''!'!''''" 1,111111111t11t111t11rrIr11111It1 IIIIMI,III1ltllllltl•1•It1111111111141111t 20:11111t111T,."� �I�O.RAVE .; � • ••._ • , I,.,yIrI II • I:I lr,li„Ilr:l „ „I,•:l,.li - �91 /�. I 411 8.0.EAYE ..— a Iwt I I 3_4• 7,0,WAINSCOT` 5 Ma _ -- )SOUTH ELEVATION 0 2 4 . o lt O 111Y1C vs".1'-0!�', " s 8 '5) I `�T,O CMU 5 T O .Q 5.5 a T J I .. I t 90.FJ,VE0 a_ 20-9"� Q d 1a Q ` to,SILL 8.0 112 1 T, MU 1I1� '11 1II;1111 / t 2 ry� - -i 11111111111.IZ1111���111111i11,i3 1 2" - U 0 trwl lI 1j1jr it (((o� [IJ h t0,-4. .•.•..... ... _ , , 1 ,,.,1 __.. ._ .tt1 1 fa d 3'_4" 0 0 MI — 1l I 4 `2 WEST ELEVATION 0 2 4 . ,. o 0 p Q 00 Q T T e 2 0 TO.a-MeU ")0 NN `) 8.40_4JV I � n' I 23-4 T.O,CMU — I .•.&LL 1 ItIr11111111111V IlII1111II1111111111111i1111t11111111111111 IIItIIt11i4411111iIlI1lIr1114N111111r1111111r111111111111111g11 IIli1' IItj1ji111141141111t1t1111111t111t11111t1r111t111•I11111111111V11r111rlI1t11111111111A11111t11111111P1t111r1r1111 IIr111111111111111 Y1I IIIIIII. I 12. I I I 1' 1'i1 g4441 H+1444g44gr1441141PI111P14p4441pd14441PPp'44441144V1Pp1g41PI1Pp11PWgqrPlq1,g41pPPppp 3 1/2.0 1•.:':1111P111411111r11111111Ar111111111111111r111r11111111111111111111111111111r114r1111111 4 111111 4 11r11111r11111rpIr1111111111111yr111111111♦111r1111 —7 1/2 ft 4:M =MP= %�Illllill�ll�lt111tp111r11 l I11111111111111r,1141111r111111111g111111tIr111111111r111r111111111111111111111111111111r11111111111r1111111111N1111:11111111r111111111111 _ 'Itjy:II111111111itIIIt1114111111111rIIr111111111111t11111111111t1111111111111111111rItI11t111111d•111tllllllrnPlWPn111man1p11ult1gt11141uiuntlrn11Pl11py1 14' �U114111111111r1111111.Ir1111111111111111111111r1111It11d1111111111tt1111141111111111111111111141111111'41t1111t11111t111111rIr14Y11g111rIt111tIIlIIr11I11tIt11111111111111I111'. T.0 y/µC� 1 4/M/07 K/pODE COMM irli��1111111111111'11r1111111111111111111•I1111111111I11111111r11111111i111114411114111111111t1111114r1r111t'111111111141i1111111,t1.1.14.1111111.111111111.,111!11111ig;11111111 •,•,y••,.I,u.• •,lrl•!•ylnr•,1•,y, !!l•,l l� ,••,•ll..,..�••�•.y.•I.4lq,.•ii 9 9A,EAVE B.O.EAVE 1 _- I 1t1 itn-� 7.0.WAMFiN,Flp, P Ir ......... EAST ELEVATION 0 2 4 . ,4 oo 1/1l.I-o' T K T .B T5) Ti--1—' O C.9 C T A.6 T r T,O,•CN .. ......,_ `�2,,04•CMU I 1. t I I T.0.3CMU nn[cr NAe[le zpea.00 I I ,e•_e! mourn OF u Cl O Q T.O.CMU� Mt 1< _ �a:i;:1 I I I I I q0 i�c / t - _— —PliliP tI.4 3 1 2• ..:nTiiiii44agqu111 1 '� 0116 01/16/W Il 1lnnnpn44ppnppn4pr 9.-8• ,, `I 1p'-2',,pp se. AS 410.M 8.0,SAVE +i OD I a.0.E1VE� I 1 I I I I 1 - 3 1 ' ELEVATIONS `� n _ _ o �T,O.wAlNscoT , '� ' r`. FIN,V. NORTH ELEVATION 0 2 e 1.4 ® Mkt ix.,.-0" "". A5.0 - 1 ►Oes is r� Expanded View A This is the view of the South entrance looking north from Vistoso Boulevard. There will be two art pieces (see Design #1 A) placed on either side of the arch. Each art piece will be approximately 21/2 feet by 31/2 feet. This is a portico for cars to pass under from right to left or left to right. There are low shrubs in front of this south-facing arch. This arch provides a view of the main doors and gives an airy feeling to the entrance. fr 1INV 41 1 R 7r A M M014111 011.0011110111111100011001101110111001011 1104111111111.11111 WWII A 101001111410111111111111.0.11011011110101 LOO1001111.1.1011110=11110011011 il 1 II i 1.--- : ' *"--. ..... 1111R0111111.111111011% *04 �'-eiva IA 1a� lAi�t"• iiiiiiiillifilalMni 1110MM4 1t --.:hiltatatlivaialos0M00111t taisisokiAtstAt►-;1 AM110040 A' zi v, i_ , . „,-,-t,-,. w � . . ... .2,, , _ , . _ I ..L._+,,.,' . 1......L.„,... r` t -# I x t --.., - I . G�'.:X'�I Maw' %. ;'Y ...� r k' 4 , [. ..rui3ar�eU. —t a+s.-sSrti '� �. :, .s. .`a".yam'. ,E-"t K:SL.....n.:..,Gf:-- Z�R's Wf4,-t.. ..A�''1+4 t^ t �i 1_ �' F i/ I f a...w...�a„. .-.1,, ...w. h+--.-- -,—r..li fi 6 A Y ii.- ... . .fi--�O'm�v a .,zw i r' • -, ..r-.. ("*:+�a aurs x s. c:+:+uacx27"--rtgr-z.r;:' s .►, t'4,7 -••+��5•a,•�•• s T� ! ` _ �-w mw `' .,.... � �� :rK..+,c - . c u� e �:j i 1�� :.`,7: a-'s!-.c..r,rvazx.,.•:1.,'..4..""W"'-"vM'^"°"�'.- !?..X.$»» ' a / -f \_ I Expanded View B. This is the view from the South looking West Entrance of Vistoso Chapel > North from Vistoso Blvd. at the west entrance. This is a pedestrian entrance from the west side. There will be one piece (see Design #1) on the south arch and one piece of the same design on the north arch that can be viewed from Vistoso Commerce `` •. " -"-"- « <mr` .- -w Loop. Each piece is approximately 7 feet by Y 21/2 feet. 1 l ., t a;4t.rF .K... T. - k }h . �i'� N � « .,at sc i" � �►� ... �4 � 111111 , ',, •?. . �. ., '.. am ! M ' 7. . x r _ ,,,, i � "�• ., »::...i+.w..=4:' �$..,.ra:+.I ,�x.8. �-;fs: 7 . - .�F s .i`s.a:FA w v�a� .-. x .uvc�n�1,,' � 11_ ..„ — . ••1$ t 11IA1An r;. ,:�41�1.1A tAA1A1A . , tie '; 1- ,.0'., �eA1AA Ai% AAAINA I z (.. .y - ,.....w..,, r 1 ti •. } 1 1 .rsr. » ...�,-,�'a+.jam n ,-... Y n S is rt w..x:.--.,,... .+�. - _ .. .-. ... A %'f w +ta� I Agreement Between Owner and Artist This agreement is made by and between Harpold Real Estate,(Owner) and Wilda Metzdorf, Images in Copper, hereinafter referred to as the "Artist". The parties mutually agree as follows: 1. Description of work: The Artist shall design, fabricate and install the following works of art: Four pieces of fused glass and copper branches to be attached to the entrances of the building. (See Designs#1 and#1A. The above work(s) of art shall hereinafter be called the "Work". 2. The artist agrees to create a preliminary design for the work in the form of studies, sketches, models, and the like. The design must be submitted to the Owner, Architect and the Town of Oro Valley for approval before the work can continue. 3. Price and payment schedule: As payment for the services of the Artist and the completed Work the Owner Shall pay the Artist the sum not to exceed $ 10,000 as follows: a) 1/3 upon the signing of this agreement. b) 1/3 upon completion of the work. c) 1/3 after installation of the work. 4. Installation Date: The Artist shall complete the Work and its installation as directed by the owner upon completion of the building. 5. Review: the Owner shall have the right at reasonable times to review the Work while in the process of execution and installation provided, however, that no such review shall be conducted in such a manner as to interrupt the Artist's work. 6. Inspection of site: It is agreed that the Artist will have access to the site at which the Work will be installed at any time prior to completion of the installation provided, however, that such access will not unreasonably delay the Owner in its preparation o the site. 7. Compliance with the Laws: The Artist shall comply with all City and State laws and regulations in the execution and installation of the Work. 8. Repairs: All repairs and restorations that are made during the lifetime of the Artist shall have the Artist's approval. To the extent practicable, the Artist shall be given the opportunity to accomplish said repairs and restoration at a reasonable fee. 9. Maintenance: The Artist's responsibility for the design, structural or fabrications flaws should end no later than one year after acceptance of the Work by Owner, after which time the Owner shall hold the Artist harmless against all claims. 10. Future Site: Any relocation of the work is the discretion of the Owner. �� r LI. 11. Artist's address: The Artist shall notify the Owner of any change of address. 12. Liability and insurance: All risks and liabilities whatsoever during the execution and prior to the beginning of installation of the Work are the responsibilities of the Artist. All risks and liabilities, once the Work is installed will be the responsibilities of the Owner. 13. Reproduction: The Artist hereby reserves all rights to copy or photographically reproduce the Work, but the Owner shall have the right to photograph the Work for brochures, media, publicity or other form of non-commercial use. Any reproduction shall include mention of both the Artist and Owner. 14: Length of Agreement: All Artist's rights under this agreement shall terminate upon death of the Artist or twenty years after signing of this agreement, whichever is later. 15: Any changes of this agreement must be in writing and signed by the Artist and the Owner. Authorization: Owner \ Artist , 1 �► • Date Date - -(_ 3 ci �r rvx.um.a'una,awa,:�.wx.rwn�t+.vn.wet� RaV�"wxYWc:�is'+vb',9taNvw aP.:+axwa.we,.d:N+.mFce,<wa':ca�.x:.e usa�c:...-. a.......,-•.fyy..:..�r.'nv�.Y r:e,�.irt<ur��r;...we:ec Y.a e....�r..�i'a�.:: •...a.ex•e+_:..�a,r' 'vi,;.r-f.-'v..�^.ft.Ja^3Ywe'R+�»'"1c'+4tMf'C.nY^:CA�•4vtl1!sHtlll+r.W}IY�aIINYYC�'v'.1.�is//!Yi a., s ri 4 { k i "' :' '' .1?,;.'i.:.:4:.::;;,--!-:.4.,,:4, '''',' f!' py. 4 h.; kr D4't-' 1 *. of 4)04 En*"ne i .,-,. w .kz..„4,-,4-., . : ,. ,.. ., . __,- -:_. : Y r`m YC- F fs "�� t. �,. . . tom. 6. ct .� 1 tI . r y • \AI/ V. ii 11111‘16 t k a: i • t t M i ‘11/ eis!ii k Additional Public Art Proposal Information for Vistoso Memorial Chapel Description and cost breakdown: Design # 1 consists of fused glass flowers and leaves mounted on patina copper branches. This design is to be placed on the North and South side of the West Entrance arch. The design is approximately 7 ft. wide and 2 ft. high. Each piece is priced at $3,300 for a total of$6,600. Design # 1A is the same concept as design #1 in a different shape and a smaller version. There are to be two pieces placed on the South side of the South entrance. Each piece will be approximately 4 ft. by 2'/2 ft. Each piece is priced at $1,700 for a total of $3,400. Total cost of artwork for two pieces of Design #1 and two pieces of Design #1A would be $10,000. Prototype selected by owner: The following is a photo of a prototype prepared for the owner. The medium is fused glass for the flowers and leaves and patina copper tubing and wire for the branches. Installation and code requirements: Each of the four works will be constructed in sections and installed using custom brackets attached to the hollow wall construction using industrial grade hollow wall anchors. Both fused glass and coated patina copper are impervious to weather and sun making them ideal materials for desert area public art. Material, fabrication and installation meet the requirements of related sections of the 2003 International Residential Code currently used by the Town of Oro Valley. WILDA METZDORF After 33 years as a professional in the field of education and as a businesswoman, Wilda turned her creative talent to developing a line of art objects and items used for home decorating. During the past 13 years Wilda has produced items using various methods of chemically colored copper, fused glass and copper enamel. Many of the items created combine more than one media such as a fused glass picture framed in a copper patina frame. Some items are functional such as fused glass salad plates or hors d'oeuvres sets. Since 1995, Wilda has participated in art festivals in Southern Arizona. These have included Tucson Museum of Art, Tempe Arts Festival, Fountain Hills Arts Festival, Oro Valley Art Festival, and the Art Fair in SaddleBrooke. In 2004, Wilda was honored to receive a commission for a piece of art for the Northwest Medical Center of Oro Valley. This piece is fused glass framed with enameled copper. Wilda works in her home and accepts customer orders. Orders have ranged from a small copper cross to an 18-foot window valance. In May of 2007, Wilda and her husband, Jim, attended a four-day workshop in Corning, New York. Both attended classes taught by the leading glass fusion artist in the United States. Both are now experimenting and applying new ideas and techniques. Jim assists with the assembly and installation of the products. EXHIBIT B VISTOSO MEMORIAL CHAPEL GUARANTEED MAXIMUM PRICE Per our Agreement dated the 18th day of January, 2006, the following Guaranteed Maximum Price Two million six hundred twenty six thousand once hundred seventy and 43/100 dollars ($2,626,170.43) is hereby incorporated by this addendum.* * THE GUARANTEED MAXIMUM PRICE IS THE SAME AS THE CONTRACT SUM AS LISTED IN EXHIBIT D OF THIS AGREEMENT. This Addendum accepted on this 16th day of March, 2007. OWNER: CONTRACTOR: VISTOSO MEMORIAL CHAPEL BFL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. And HARPOLD REALESTATE, LLC An Arizona Corporation By: By: Doug Harpold eg Thomps Manager mator/Proje anager 26 • PROJECT SUMMARY BFL CONSTRUCTION CO.INC. 700 E.BROADWAY#200 TUCSON,ARIZONA 85719 JOB NAME: Vistoso Memorial Chapel ARCHITECT: Advantech Facility D. LOCATION: 2285 E.Rancho Vistoso Blvd. PROPOSAL# PO 05149 JOB DESCRIPTION Memorial Chapel DATE: 09-Mar-07 ESTIMATOR: Greg Thompson JOB# DESCRIPTION SITE SHELL T.I. UPGRADES ESTIMATE 01500 BARRICADES 02050 DEMOLITION 02051 ASBESTOS 02102 BUILDING LAYOUT $10,989.00 $10,989.00 02110 SITE TESTING $3,000.00 $3,000.00 02120 SPECIAL INSPECTION $3,500.00 $3,500.00 02200 EARTHWORK $70,360.75 $70,360.75 • 02251 TERMITE TREATMENT $4,961.95 $4,961.95 02480 LANDSCAPING $53,355.00 $53,355.00 02500 PAVING $87,000.00 $87,000.00 02560 STRIPES&BUMPS $2,500.00 $2,500.00 02700 PIPED UTILITIES $174,938.00 $174,938.00 03300 CONCRETE $192,826.00 $192,826.00 03361 EXTRUDED CURB $21,250.00 $21,250.00 03363 VERTICAL CURB 03400 PRECAST CONCRETE 03700 CONCRETE RESTORATION/CLE 03800 SAW CUT&CORE DRILLING $2,500.00 $2,500.00 04100 STUCCO $70,560.00 $70,560.00 04200 MASONRY $200,000.00 $200,000.00 05050 ANCHOR BOLTS/FASTENORS $1,200.00 $1,200.00 05100 STRUCTURAL STEEL $64,834.40 $64,834.40 05200 PERMANENT FENCING 05300 METAL BUILDING 05400 STEEL ERECTION 06100 ROUGH CARPENTRY TRUSSES $54,484.78 $54,484.78 06100 ROUGH CARPENTRY TJI TRUST $22,453.20 $22,453.20 06100 ROUGH CARPENTRY $30,972.00 $30,972.00 06200 FINISH CARPENTRY $6,480.00 $6,480.00 06400 MILLWORK $16,575.00 $16,575.00 07100 WATERPROOFING 07150 ENKAMAT(VISQUINE) 07200 INSULATION $27,000.00 $27,000.00 07250 FIREPROOFING $2,600.00 $2,600.00 07500 ROOFING $75,000.00 $75,000.00 07600 FLASHING&SHEET METAL $4,685.00 $4,635.00 08100 HOLLOW METAL 08210 DOORS/FRAMES/HARDWARE $58,721.00 $58,721.00 08300 SPECIAL DOORS $6,600.00 $6,600.00 08500 WINDOWS $14,520.00 $14,520.00 08800 GLASS&GLAZING $3,080.00 $3,080.00 08900 DOOR INSTALL 09250 DRYWALL $175,971.00 $175,971.00 09300 CERAMIC TILE $40,000.00 $40.000 00 09500 CEILINGS/ACOUSTICAL $14,700.00 $14.700.00 09550 FLOORCOVERING $38,370.00 $38,370.00 09560 POURED FLOORS 09600 STONE FLOORING 09900 PAINTING $12,002.00 $22,398.00 $34,400.00 09920 Sealants $2,500.00 $2,500.00 09960 MARBLE 10100 MAILBOX $200.00 $200.00 10101 LOCKERS 10103 PROJECTION SCREEN 10104 FOLDING PARTITION $23,360.00 $23,360.00 10105 ROOF HATCH $2,800.00 $2,800.00 10106 NARCOTIC LOCKERS 10107 WALL PROTECTION 10108 CORNER GUARDS 10109 GUARD RAILS 10114 INTERIOR WATER FEATURE 10520 FIRE EXTINGUISHERS $1,320.00 $1,320.00 10700 AWNINGS 10800 TOILET&BATH ACCESS. $9,632.00 $9,832.00 10900 SIGNS $5,500.00 $5,500.00 11020 SECURITY SYSTEMS $3,544.25 $3,544.25 11400 FOOD SERV.EQUIP./APPLIANC 11444 FUNERAL HOME CREAMAT1ON $27,700.00 $27,700.00 .12500 WINDOW TREATMENT 12600 FURNITURE 14200 ELEVATORS 14250 AIR TUBE SYSTEM 14302 BODY LIFT $2,500.00 $2,500.00 14400 HOOKS&CRANES ( 15200 CENTRAL VACUUM 15400 PLUMBING $32,854.00 $32,854.00 15400 PLUMBING 15500 SPRINKLERS/FIRE PROTECTIO $22,465.50 $22,485.50 15500 SEWER FIXTURES $9,452.80 $9,452.80 15510 FIRE SPRINKLER ENGINEERIN( 15600 H.V.AC. $118,760.00 $118,760.00 15700 AIR BALANCE $3,588.00 $3,588.00 16100 ELECTRICAL $27,877.00 $148,832.00 $176,709.00 16300 FIRE ALARM $14,984.00 $14,984.00 16100 PARKING LOT POLE LIGHTS 17001 PRINTS $1,000.00 $1,000.00 17002 ARCHITECTS FEES 17100 CONTINGENCY 17200 ALLOWANCES 17600 INSURANCE&BONDS $3,960.47 $6,534.01 $7,137.38 $17,631.86 17805 JOBSITE OFFICE SUPPLIES $112.19 $185.09 $202.18 $499.45 17900 SUPERVISION $17,018.85 $28,077.78 $30,670.61 $75,767.24 17901 SAFETY SUPERVISION $4,139.72 $6,829.73 $7,460.42 $18,429.87 17910 BFL LABOR/TEMP LABOR $3,913.10 $6,455.85 $7,052.02 $17,420.97 17930 PROJECT MANAGER $15,706.26 $25,912.26 $28,305.11 $69,923.62 17950 PERMITS 17970 TEMPORARY UTILITIES $3,563.08 $5,878.38 $6,421.22 $15,862.67 17980 EXTRA EXPENSE 17991 CLEAN UP MATERIALS $78.53 $129.56 $141.53 $349.62 17992 SUBS CLEAN UP $954.27 $1,574.35 $1,719.74 $4,248.36 17994 PROJECT FENCEING TEMP. 17995 PROJECT TRAILER $1,121.88 $1,850.88 $2,021.79 $4,994_54 17996 DUMPSTERS $2,827.13 $4,664.21 $5,094.92 $12,586.25 17997 PORTA-TOILETS $448.75 $740.35 $808.72 $1,997.82 17998 JOBSITE TELEPHONE $538.50 $888.42 $970.46 $2,397.38 COST SUB TOTAL $516,614.42 $848,188.24 $926,513.63 $2,291,316.30 OVERHEAD 4.00% $20,664.58 $33,927.53 $37,060.55 $91,652.65 FEE 2.50% $12,915.36 $21,204.71 $23,162.84 $57,282.91 SUB TOTAL $550,194.35 $903,320.48 $986,737.02 $2,440,251.85 TAX 6.57% $36,147.77 $59,348.16 $64,828,62 $160,324.55 SUB TOTAL $586,342.12 $962,668.64 $1,051,565.64 $2,600,576.40 BOND $5,748.93 fit_. $10,360.47c,5R TOTAL COST OF JOB $592,091.06 $972,153.25 $1,061,926.11 $2,626,170.43 TOTAL BUILD.SF 14177 $41.76 $68.57 $74.90 $185.24 r$ `1,72 ,22.I,52- .ke.il Cam,-,fi. (( I' CQt� c() 2)• 2.)- 1 I MINUTES ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION October 3, 2007 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER *5:30 PM CALL TO ORDER — 5:30 PM ROLL CALL PRESENT: Paul Loomis, Mayor Helen Dankwerth, Vice Mayor Paula Abbott, Council Member K.C. Carter, Council Member Barry Gillaspie, Council Member Al Kunisch, Council Member Terry Parish, Council Member EXECUTIVE SESSION AT OR AFTER *5:30 PM Mayor Loomis announced that in addition to the Town Council, the Town Manager, the Town Attorney and the Town Clerk, Human Resources Director Sandra Abbey, would also be present in Executive Session for Item 1. MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Kunisch and seconded by Vice Mayor Dankwerth to go into Executive Session at 5:32 PM for the following purpose: Pursuant to ARS §§38-431.03(A)(3), discussion and consultation for legal advice, and (A)(4), discussion and consultation with legal counsel in order to consider its position and instruct its attorneys regarding contract negotiations. MOTION carried, 7-0. 1) Pursuant to ARS §§38-431.03(A)(1), discussion and consideration regarding assignment of an interim Town Attorney until a permanent replacement Town Attorney is selected through the recruitment process, Council may vote to meet in Executive Session with management staff regarding this matter. Ms. Abbey left the Executive Session at the close of discussion of Item 1. During this time, Chief Civil Deputy Attorney Joseph Andrews and Water Utility Director Philip Saletta joined the Executive Session for Item 2. 10/03/07 Minutes, Council Regular Session 2 *2) Pursuant to ARS §§38-431.03(A)(3) and 38-431.03(A)(4), discussion and consultation with the Town Attorney regarding the potential impact of the November 2007 City of Tucson ballot proposition 200 (the Tucson water user's bill of rights) on intergovernmental agreements between the Town and the City of Tucson relating to the delivery of water MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Carter and seconded by Vice Mayor Dankwerth to go out of Executive Session at 6:30 p.m. MOTION carried, 7-0. RESUME REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER — 7:00 PM ROLL CALL PRESENT: Paul Loomis, Mayor Helen Dankwerth, Vice Mayor Paula Abbott, Council Member K.C. Carter, Council Member Barry Gillaspie, Council Member Al Kunisch, Council Member Terry Parish, Council Member PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Loomis led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS - TOWN MANAGER Town Manager David Andrews reviewed the upcoming Town meetings. COUNCIL REPORTS Council Member Carter reported on the progress of the Honeybee Village project. He presented samples of the slump block to Council along with pictures of the retaining wall. He stated that he was pleased with the workmanship. Council Member Abbott attended a meeting presented by the Goldwater Institute that featured Clint Bolick regarding incentives for commercial development. She noted that she would like him to present his perspective to Council in the near future. 10/03/07 Minutes, Council Regular Session 3 DEPARTMENT REPORTS Planning and Zoning Director Sarah More stated that the Citizens Planning Institute would hold its first in a series of classes on October 11, 2007. She noted that space was available and that citizens could sign up by contacting the Development Services Department. TOWN MANAGER'S REPORT - No report ORDER OF BUSINESS: CALL TO AUDIENCE Town resident Geri Ottoboni-Gilmore stated that the zoning heighth requirement for hotels should remain at 34 feet and not increased to 75 feet. Council Members responded stating that property owners have the right to request variances and the final decision rested with the Town Council. PRESENTATIONS - Presentation of Certificates of Appreciation to the Southern Arizona Mayor Loomis and Planning and Zoning Director Sarah More presented Certificates of Appreciation to members of the Southern Arizona Homebuilders Association (SAHBA) for their donations of time and resources to aide in the preservation of the historic Steam Pump Ranch. The following members were recognized: • Grady Artez, Gradybilt Design • Art Flagg, Chairman of the Board of SAHBA • Alex Jacome, Government Liaison of SAHBA • Jim Mack, Greater Oro Valley Arts Council (GOVAC) Special Projects Coordinator Scott Nelson accepted certificates on behalf of those who could not be present: • Pat Manley, Johnson Manley Lumber • Dave Van Gelder, Tricon Contracting • Scott Eckstrom, Ralph Hays Roofing • Lee Hoffman, Lee Hoffman Roofing Art Flagg accepted the certificate for Ed Taczanowsky President of SAHBA. - Presentation to Town Attorney Melinda Garrahan in appreciation of her service Mayor Loomis reviewed the highlights of Ms. Garrahan's illustrious career. Staff presented Ms. Garrahan with an original piece of artwork by local artist Chris 10/03/07 Minutes, Council Regular Session 4 Bubany as a token of appreciation for her service. Mayor, Council and Staff wished her well in her retirement. 1. CONSENT AGENDA A. Minutes - September 12, 2007 B. Building Safety Activity Report - August 2007 C. Police Report - August 2007 D. Coyote Run Monthly Report - August 2007 E. Report on Emergency repairs to the 16-inch main located on Lambert Lane east of La Canada F. Appointment of Dan Rhoads and Sandra Abbey to the Corrections Officer Retirement Plan local board for two-year terms ending June 30, 2009; and Nancy Anderson and Pat Kalahar to the Corrections Officer Retirement Plan local board for four-year terms ending June 30, 2011 G. Resolution No. (R)07- 108 Supporting No Child Left Behind Improvement Act of 2007, H.R. 648 H. OV5-07-10 Approval of public art for the Wingate Inn Hotel, located within the Steam Pump Village development at the intersection of Oracle Road and Hanley Boulevard I. OV5-07-08 Approval of public art for the Vistoso Memorial Chapel, located at 2285 E. Rancho Vistoso Boulevard J. *Resolution No. (R)07-110 Authorizing and directing the Town Manager to enter into an agreement with Alphagraphics to provide printing and mail house services for the Town's newsletter, not to exceed $40,000 MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Carter and seconded by Council Member Parish to approve the consent agenda. MOTION carried, 7-0. 2. RESOLUTION NO. (R)07- 109 PROVIDING NOTICE OF INTENT TO ESTABLISH A STORMWATER UTILITY FEE AND SETTING THE PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR NOVEMBER 7, 2007 MOTION: A motion was made by Vice Mayor Dankwerth and seconded by Council Member Carter to approve Resolution (R)07-109 authorizing the 10/03/07 Minutes, Council Regular Session 5 publishing of the Notice of Intent to establish a Stormwater Utility Fee and to hold a public hearing of the matter on November 7, 2007. Council Member Parish stated that he would not support the tax as he felt it was unnecessary. Council Member Abbott stated that she would support the resolution in order to meet the unfunded Federal mandate. MOTION carried, 6-1 with Council Member Parish opposed. 3. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION NO. (R)07-59, OV8- 0605 REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR THE ABOVE-GROUND REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER POLES AND ELECTRIC UTILITY WIRES, LOCATED ALONG THE SOUTHSIDE OF TANGERINE ROAD RIGHT Tucson Electric Power (TEP) representative Larry Lucero reviewed the reasons for TEP's request for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). • The grid for Rancho Vistoso continues to run overloaded. • This item continues to be the most critical within Oro Valley. Mr. Lucero requested that Council follow the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Discussion ensued regarding: • Cost to put in the power lines above ground vs. underground. o TEP would be willing to underground the wires if the Town paid for the additional cost of undergrounding which was over $400,000. o New poles would be shorter and narrower and the number of poles would increase. • TEP would be willing to research the possibility of using fewer poles if the poles were larger. • Reliability of undergrounding vs. above ground lines. • TEP would bring forward more issues in November. • The need to complete the upgrades to the grid prior to the next monsoon season. • It was noted that 3 people were on life support systems in the area serviced by this power grid. It was further noted that life support systems have back up batteries in the event of a power failure. Sarah More presented the Staff Report. She summarized that the Town's Zoning Code required undergrounding utility lines however, Council had the authority to 10/03/07 Minutes, Council Regular Session 6 make an exception. She noted that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval. The General Plan also recommended working with utility providers to underground utilities and discouraged the use of poles for aesthetic reasons. Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing at 8:03 p.m. Oro Valley resident Salette Latas cited the benefits of undergrounding utility lines per a study conducted by Edison Electric: • Unobstructed views • Reduction in operations, maintenance and tree trimming costs • Less storm damage • Reduced losses in electricity sales due to power outages induced by storms • Enhanced reliability • Reduced injuries and deaths due to cars striking utility poles Mayor Loomis closed the public hearing at 8:07 p.m. MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Parish and seconded by Vice Mayor Dankwerth to deny (R)07-59. It was noted that the Regional Transit Authority (RTA) would not pay to relocate utility lines. MOTION carried, 5-2 with Council Member Carter and Council Member Kunisch opposed. MOTION: A motion was made by Vice Mayor Dankwerth and seconded by Council Member Abbott to take the necessary funding from the Contingency Fund to pay for the Town's share of the cost of undergrounding the wiring on Tangerine Road at this time. Council Member Parish stated that he could not support the motion. Council Member Gillaspie stated that he was not comfortable using the Contingency Funds for this purpose and could not vote in favor of this motion. Council Member Abbott stated she wanted to begin undergrounding right away and was in favor of this motion. Mayor Loomis noted that the Town law states that new lines must be underground and that he did not support this motion. 10/03/07 Minutes, Council Regular Session 7 MOTION failed, 2-5 with Mayor Loomis, Council Member Carter, Council Member Gillaspie, Council Member Kunisch, and Council Member Parish opposed. Mayor Loomis called for a recess at 8:30 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 8:39 p.m. 4. APPOINTMENT OF INTERIM TOWN ATTORNEY MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Parish and seconded by Council Member Carter to appoint Tobin Sidles as Interim Town Attorney until the new Town Attorney begins employment and simultaneously to appoint Joe Andrews as Interim Chief Civil Attorney reporting to the Interim Town Attorney for the same time period and that both the Interim Town Attorney and the Interim Chief Civil Attorney shall receive a temporary salary increase of 10% for the duration of the interim appointments. MOTION carried, 7-0. 5. **CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION TO RECONSIDER THE TOWN COUNCIL'S SEPTEMBER 19, 2007 VOTE APPROVING COUNCIL POLICY #4, UPDATING THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY MEETING FACILITIES USAGE POLICY MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Gillaspie and seconded by Council Member Abbott to reconsider the adoption of the policy. MOTION carried, 4-3 with Mayor Loomis, Vice Mayor Dankwerth, and Council Member Parish opposed. 6. **CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING COUNCIL POLICY #4 UPDATE - TOWN OF ORO VALLEY MEETING FACILITIES USAGE POLICY MOTION: A motion was made by Vice Mayor Dankwerth and seconded by Council Member Gillaspie to continue this item to the October 17, 2007 Council meeting. MOTION carried, 7-0. 7. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Council Member Abbott directed Staff to invite Mr. Clint Bolick of the Goldwater Institute to speak at a Council Study Session. 10/03/07 Minutes, Council Regular Session 8 Council Member Gillaspie requested an Oro Valley Zoning Code amendment to require that Development Review Board meetings are public hearings. Council Member Abbott requested that Staff include in the forthcoming Council packet, Pima County's library policy regarding facility usage. CALL TO AUDIENCE - No speakers ADJOURNMENT MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Carter and seconded by Council Member Parish to adjourn. MOTION carried, 7-0. Prepared by: Christina Pickering Office Specialist I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the regular session of the Town of Oro Valley Council of Oro Valley, Arizona held on the day of 2007. I further certify that the meeting was duly called and held and that a quorum was present. Dated this day of , 2007. Kathryn E. Cuvelier, CMC Town Clerk To: Town of Oro Valley Re: Change of design of public art In regards to the public art for the Vistoso Memorial Chapel, I have reviewed and approved the changes requested by the artist Wilda Metzdorf for our project. We have found that the space allotted for the art is larger in size than originally thought, and the space allows for a better design and placement of the art. The changes will increase the visibility of the art to the public while also changing the design of the art to a design that would have been even more acceptable to the art committee. Douglas Harpold, Owner Vistoso Memorial Chapel ECEOVE OCT 2 5 2007 Town of Oro Valley APPROVED PM/MId� . OA A 2 0 vowitgah PZ PROJECT M N GER E \W-E- MEMO OCT 2 5 2007 To: Debbie Moran From: Wilda Metzdorf Tarr of Oro Valle , Date: October 25, 2007 Re: Change in Public Art for Vistoso Memorial Chapel This is a request to make a placement change in the location for the art to be placed on the West entrance of the Vistoso Memorial Chapel. The original placement of the art that was approved by the Public Art Review Committee and the Town Council was based on spaces of adequate size to accommodate a sizable piece of art. The art was placed on either side of the West entrance above the arch. According to the architectural plans, the West side of the entrance did not allow enough space above the arch. (Figure #1.) During the hearing with the PARC, it was agreed that the art would be more visible if it were on the West side, but understood the problem with space. At some time during construction the dimensions on the top of the arch on the West side were changed and the owners were not aware of this until after actual construction and the art approval process. The top of the arch was deepened and is now a better place for the art. The owners and I propose placing a larger piece on the West side as shown in Figure #2. No changes are proposed for the art placement on the South entrance. Thank you for your consideration. x_greL , 4 Wilda Metzdorf, Artist • , , -- 7 _ ' t � ..._..-..... _.,_,....,.... .�...,,z..: ... -- >,.. .,. .-_.,... :._...r. _..-.,_.�s.�...,�.. �,.a ._ ...., �..._a.,v__R �JL T Et E 3 T_' F.. OOO.; I t 1 -q.. . ? �3t2' r ►tfrs I I . !_ I 1 `/ I 1 • :�' t• nt l:Il i r t i r r,t R-1 1,I: .�su,r.rfiv.•l yea rrwsss.t. �reaysar.ta tsw+rrs• Y�trs.rslalt,t rrlrrl , ++ , r 12- lYlri tl..� 4 r Ilt�ri11 r,.t,1t,,.r r111 1r 11' f 3 1 .:oS 1,r.rin • : _ iit/ulnn;;;;;;;;; rt,:r, t,Irrt 1.c-�,,'re ��fAfs:mPe+rm.+4sl ! rt:tterr,I,a.,! l,tr., ,rr err r "�o.aist.=,,„,frf 4..e,,vN]S�rt.l .i.2;tt;r..:t2.. f trr.r ,y !i!I;kJ' t r 11J r rr t f r 1 1 1 r r,,,r r;It l,11 i- • Wseefat..:4•�•1•.•r.'a•f,.Il.tat;f..i/b43(}dy.ely.•L->e'tlCrtitt l�',rJ:ftfll.}....1fJ,p,Y�l.(✓ .�r,iY.l1 1 t t I rl / s t -r I �.00.4..s/4l Me4f.?.1-.10./....:y_.if_l_u1.41,a.t.1t,ifLUska;I/s+J.ttsrr.a.aw:s• ,,w r r t r I,r r f t t t,I I t r I,r i,,r., t r�r t r t a tam- vaot • 1 =ter ( I It. r 4 I —- n 1 _.7Z' ,-. }SOUTH ELEVATION . : 4 I s �Ls_ I .i fr -A 40 T $10.-4 • �C/.-z! ---` c --?.� - - • II = _ le.)-f2- -----'7(L -(;:-/--7--c-'-'(-- )er."-----r-"-.C"---'C:-"•---) ,. ,._ _ _14 ram ;WEST ELEVATION . It 4 ft ,. >,OW -ir (i) T T ? _ ._. ........._ .., It . . . _ _. . 1 fit,. + 1,_ ,,,,,,,.n,, . _--- --- --- ___ ___ �----- ",'''''''',.. 111111. +tar+ 1 0 ° 1711:L-7 I II (3 . In I a in -±74•4-..• 13 t.' . .-.- -___ L; • I 0 • ELEVATION . : 4 It ,U1/1114r-r— O O O O F) E3 EO 0 4 O O Ayi --. i de VOW i I I oIoI I en. Io1 ;;;; I 1 1 Cl i II J tl/!'►- ;;; .:;;; I I I II i• ;............ .......................... 1 1ril t. I "� 0 0 I I .T WF LEI II D _ I I . &In= ®NORTH ELEVATION . 2 4 1 4 i 1 , _... V - _______. ,,, . ; .,.•, 1,..., - „.., .. -- . . . • , ) T tOr . 1• i a N r .. , -f vet, __'Ift .. .\:":"\-. a„p �.- - .ate • ' ',f. zt .3., It r TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT 11000 N.La Canada Drive,Oro Valley,AZ 85737 4 A. (520) 229-4800 Fax (520) 742-1022 `,cw4 ...a 11Pc DED November 14, 2007 Beverly R. Harpold 65255 E. Emerald Ridge Drive Tucson,AZ 85739 825.2322 Fax: 825.2237 RE: OV5-o7-o8A, Harpold Real Estate LLC, represented by Wilda Metzdorf, requests administrative change to the approved public art for the Vistoso Memorial Chapel, located at 2285 E. Rancho Vistoso Boulevard. Dear Beverly, At their regularly scheduled meeting on November 13, 2007, the Public Art Review Committee voted 3-o that they were supportive of the proposed location change to the public art previously approved. As such, the Planning and Zoning Director has approved your request for administrative approval the requested public art revision. As there were no conditions of approval, staff has stamped the plans as approved. If you have any questions, please contact me. We look forward to the successful completion of this project. Most Cordially, Pe...J._ f . P-e-I-1-i.1:---— Pamela J. Pelletier Planner 520.229.4813 ppelletier@orovalley.net F:\OV\OV5\2007\OV5-07-08 1 www.townoforovalley.com