Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOV130306 01/16/2003 16:09 5207421 A92 PAGE 01/01 Po Y.ARi2o� `�No�:�' Planning &Zoning Division 11000 N. La Canada Drive, Oro Valley AZ 85737 Phone: (520)229-4800 Fax: (520)742-1022 www.townoforovalley.com APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROJECT ARCHITECTURE DATE: OV CASE NO.: Y" ` ' --c .0 (office use only) PROJECT NAME: ,ZJ.:G4&7- SUBDIVISION 4/elic Vi6} LOT# el Bo eitb00 ; 2___. LOCATION 1 ADDRESS: \/tt3z LRM✓ll- ZONING .1- PARCEL NUMBER: Z.Z 3 02-0 t LOT SIZE ,ZZ nags' . MODEL NAMES OR NUMBERS , /l " APPLICANT; -- �, ("AL),J l_ ADDRESS; 6CC&'cj 1z. G�14 .� A4,0 - J cAcSo,.) 42- S-S / Z PHONE NO.: „6s7 FAX NO,: �.�i` 72.1 j _ PROPERTY OWNER: 1 S i 1- 3 6t4 &tiLLjI ADDRESS: RL' A''- "5 2 PHONE NO.: i e 5 3 J( FAX NO: 2' PROJECT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: t Jgi,,�Ii� 6 ADDRESS: 17i.. v� i- (>'i-Q 4- SY 7( L DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BO '% E.RING DATE: SIGNATURE: ,i� / ` DATE:J V Submittal Requirements: $150.00 Fee ONE COPY OF 24X36 SCALED ELEVATIONS Fifteen copies of the following: -- Dimensioned Elevations of all four sides of all buildings(11"x 17"format) Commercial projects require color drawings or photographs of elevations(81/:"x 11"format) List square footage of buildings Y- Site Plan(11"x 17"format) Color chips of body,trim and roof tiles(81/2"by 11"format) Applications will not be accepted without all required materials. SUBMITTALS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AT LEAST 18 CALENDAR DAYS IN ADVANCE OF THE DESIRED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD HEARING DATE. F:IAdmin PZIFORM5\Shannon Project Subdivision Development HandoutIDRBPROJARCHAPP•doc ORO VALLEY PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD REPORT Meeting Date: February 11, 2003 TO: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD FROM: David Ronquillo,Planner I SUBJECT: OV13-03-06, INTERTECH ARCHITECTURAL INTERIORS INC,REPRESENTING GUM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, REQUESTS ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL FOR AN OFFICE & LABORATORY FACILITY; LOCATED WITHN RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 2,PARCEL#22302014B BACKGROUND: The subject property consists of 1.22 acres and located within the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development(PAD) Neighborhood 2 directly south of the existing Easy Care facility. The zoning is PAD with a land use designation of Campus Park Industrial. SUMMARY: Intertech Architectural Interiors has submitted architectural renderings for the proposed Gum Technology facility. The structure will consist of a two story building approximately 32' - 8", which has been carefully designed to fit within the existing environment. The building is low and clustered providing a variation of rooflines and adequate architectural treatments on all four elevations. The design elements found in this project are similar with the development to the north, Easy Care Facility and the commercial properties southeast of this site. The architecture maintains general themes that are consistent in design and style with the surrounding properties and is compatible with the existing area. OVZCR Design Guidelines There are three distinct sets of design guidelines that apply to the project: Oracle Road Overlay District in Section 10, Design Guidelines in OVZCR Section 16 and the Rancho Vistoso PAD Design Standards. The following items are noteworthy: 10-408D1: Principal structures are constructed of rough masonry, slump block, or similar materials; board and batten, untreated cinder block or metal buildings are prohibited. The proposed building complies with these standards. 16-103B2: Design should consider the historic context. The history is closely related to the climate; therefore, southwest themes are consistent with the character of the area, but are not intended to limit the architectural vocabulary. Historic styles include:southwest traditional, territorial,pueblo, and Spanish colonial. F:\OV\OV 13\2003\13-03-06\DRBrpt.doc The proposed architecture conforms to the recommended historic styles. 16-103B5b: Coordinate similar project types on adjoining parcels, e.g. commercial at an intersection. Coordinated means that certain design elements, such as size of walls, open space, colors, or landscape elements can be similar. Compatibility and visual coherence is desired, not necessarily sameness. The design is compatible with the surrounding area. Rancho Vistoso PAD Design Standards The architectural design for this building conforms to these standards. 16-103.B-4, Reduce the apparent size and mass of larger buildings. a. Break up mass of large buildings by dividing into basic geometric components (one story at pedestrian entrances), with intersecting wall planes. The proposed building avoids the appearance of one single massive structure. b. Emphasize the horizontal, but break up long continuous building surfaces with off sets or contrasting form. This building integrates various architectural elements to prevent a long continuous building surface. c. Vary roof line silhouettes The roofline for this building varies in height. d. Encourage wall mass over glass area. The front elevation facing Vistoso Commerce Loop provides a combination of wall mass over glass area. The use of windows is prominent in this elevation to emphasize the main entrance of the building. The remainder of the building elevations provides an adequate blend of wall mass and glass area. e. Utilize pedestrian scale features at the ground level, such as planters, benches and textures. The front entranceway to the building does not depict pedestrian scale features. A condition has been added for this to be achieved. f Design buildings with consideration given to all sides of a building. All four elevations have been consistently treated. In sum, the proposed architecture utilizes the same design elements & colors of the adjacent buildings and is compatible with the surrounding area. A sample of the exterior colors,body trims and roof sample are attached. GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE: The proposed architecture complies with the General Plan Design Policies. In particular, Policy 9.1F, which states, "All sides of buildings may impact their surroundings and should be coherently designed and treated". Overall, the four elevations of this building are consistently designed and treated. F:\OV\OV 13\2003\13-03-06\DRBrpt.doc PRESENTATION REQUIREMENTS: All presentations before Boards, Commissions, and Council must be formatted to be shown on the Town's projection system or overhead system. A presentation must be designed to insure that the audience, staff, and the voting body can view the graphics. Examples of acceptable computer formats are PowerPoint, ArcView, videotape of presentation boards, and/or overhead transparences. The applicant is responsible for the development,presentation, and coordination of all presentation materials. If an applicant does not conform to the aforementioned resolution, the item may be continued due to non-compliance. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends architectural approval for the Gum Technology with the conditions listed in Exhibit A. SUGGESTED MOTIONS: The DRB may consider one of the following motions: I move to approve OV 13-03-06, Architecture for the Gum Technology with the conditions listed in Exhibit "A" attached, herewith. OR I move to approve OV 13-03-06, Architecture for the Gum Technology with the conditions listed in Exhibit "A" attached,herewith and the following added condition(s): . OR I move to deny OV 13-03-06,Architecture for the Gum Technology, finding that: . Attachments: 1. Exhibit"A" 2. Floor Plan/Elevations 3. Color renderings cc: Attn: Steve Shields Intertech Architecture Interiors 6089 E. Grant Tucson,AZ 85712 Fax: 881-0995 F:\OV\OV 13\2003\13-03-06\DRBrpt.doc • EXHIBIT "A" OV13-03-06 ARCHITECTURE 1. All signage for this project must be approved by the DRB Agenda Review Committee by a separate permit. 2. The front entranceway to the building must utilize benches and/or planters for pedestrian scale features. F:\ov\ov13\2003\13-03-06\DRBrpt.doc f I 1 1 I I 1 1 I ,._1 ,,,,„ , NIP flar il :: - - - - 1 - 1 - - ____-__LL.L____ - - i' _„ ......, . 4 111:11111 ism : Ili. • is rimillu irr Imo a . ,, , ,_,„ .. , ..... Yam_. FRONT ELEVATION N N NW N 111 - 11111 17111 FRONT ELEVATION , 1 MI ... PM p REAR ELEVATION INTERTECH ARCHITECTURAL INTERIORS i r PIM 1 i � v LEFT-SIDE ELEVATION _ _ _ 141 RIGHT-SIDE ELEVATION INTERTECH ARCHITECTURAL INTERIORS OK PAGE RIDGE LINE AN �} 32'-8 `-' \ - - - 'A.F.F. Nqr CD TOP OF PARAPET r 26'-G'AFF. F.... I (�, 'I L Ck `-' \ J pt oKEYNOTES P3 Z I `�" P' TOP OF PARAPET I ATAS INTERNATIONAL,INC.CURVED 1ETAL ROOF '-----1 r-----w T----, T•-----1 r 1 / 1 Z2'-O AFF. SYSTEM.COLOR H2O SLATE GREY K. ---1 I x O I n O a O n n O x u I //O Z 2 AN IDLE WINDOWS AND ENTRY BRONZE W/NTERPANE ITB SYSTEM,GLASS. COLOR Ix x p x n x 2 n n I I I II F----Il_=-/ 16==-=J L4-= 31L===:�J Lam{ // / 3 STNNLESSSTEELRAILIN6MY6LASS © I I I I I P1 PANELING_ P2 L--i---± I + 1 © I II (� I 0 I I ." _ TOP OF PARAPET 4 OUTLINE OF ROOF BEYOND. L�J-- -J .- ` _ i---i J OF APP.1 5 FINISH FLOOR LINE. Q . ) 2Nt7 PLR LINE rC7f III jjj S. I'xl"SCORE. 13'-0"APP. 7 METAL ROLL-LP DOOR. Pl P+ P1 F1 Pt PI D CMU BLOCK SCREEN HALL W/STIK.CO PAINT P4. 0 ,..(") l 9 LOADING PIT our DR. AFF. 8 J_}!// IO LOWanSD ENTRY DR TO UTILITY RM. �- ova_ P3 II WALL MOUNT LIGHT PACK FOR SITE LIGHTING. /1/ TMP- B O- / oT O MOUNT•I5'-0'MAX.ABOVE FINSP FLOOR TYP. o ' ` ` /1 \` TYP. \ / 0 pt 12 T ITPMXT To BE EGVISCREE1 BALLYII P2 0 / P+ O \/ \ 1 f/ Pl Pt _ O O 13 CONCRETE SIDENALIC S O PI> \ / TMP / 0 CA G7 FOR LINE �- v r----- �---� Ocp"AFF. TYP Q1 - P' --- . /i - -- ,, 1 I FINISH. " 0 EXTERIOR GRADE' , V In DUN N-EDWARDS W41TE ZIN 5P-212 L ir J� P2 DUNK-EDWARDS BOL DER GRAY DE-5005 P3 MIN-EDWARDS DRY OUTPOST DE 3072 P4 pUNd-EDWARDS Z-ZIP DE 3163 O REAR ELEVATION SCALE:3/1 6"-I.-0" ►° RIDGE LINE 32'-8"AF.F. LII I I I II I 11 11 11 = n 9 0 TOP OP PARAPET tlis I I 2'2 -B"APP. / IOF / / / l 4 TOP 225-0�T Vir TOP OF PARAPET Y 24 Pt Pt I `--r '-0"APP. I I I r---1 1 C+?+ I__® ©_ I I I o / P4 / { 0J / P+ f /f / 0 / ,� A A/ i bl i EN / 0 2ND FLR LINE Pt TrP- •13=0"AF.F. IF --- Pl (� / P4 0 1 P4 ° 0 0 0 0 0 O O TYP- I , / �; O // / 0 4 O �, 0 TOP OF SCR.WALL / \/ / n 4 3 "AFF \ ��/ P3 P4 0 F1 5 P1 3� O O TYP. - O 6RND FLR LINE 411, 0 d p APJILINE - - T'5 - - _ 0'-0"A F. VIIIF GRADE I SIDEWALK FRONT ELEVATION oTU l�U 11TE�JU L LEGAL DESCRIPTION TECTURAL INTER/O R s A portion of Section 29,Township 11 South, Range 14 East,Gib o SCALE: 3/16"=1'-a' U V and Solt River Bose and Meridian,Pima County,Arizona Roams 7IwsT APART Rows MOM. TVOsoM,ARRoaw 1//1201NF0i00 1ST FLOOR 8.490 SQ. FT. E ) SECOND FLOOR 1.957 SQ. FT, GUM TECHNOLOGY TOTAL 10,447 SO. FT. NEW RESEARCH FACILITY CONTOUR INTERVAL= 1'-0' ELEVATIONS Scale: 1'= 20'-0' Job Number:02010.000 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Dote: 12-18-02 VISTOSO COASERCE LOOP Drown By: SHS TOWN OF ORO VALLEY nEve06 Checked By: 0V12-02-20 BOOK PAGE SHEET 1 OF 3 © 2002, INTERTECH ARCHITECTURAL INTERIORS, INC. BOOK PAGE o RIDGE LIT 32'-6=AFF. 2b'-8-8 AFF.PARAPET " TOP or WALL A z6-OrAFF. 'IFPt r TOP OF PARAPET P1 24'-0`AF.F. 0T OF PARAPET P4 , 2OP 2'O"AF.F. I I I I 0 0 ✓ O O I ® I ® I (N ��,, 11 CI TOP OF PARAPET �- - L 1 ----- L'J\ /1 A.F.F. -- + 6 I 4 + 2ND FLR LINE ilk L-- ------ --- 13'-0 At.F. S. 0 P4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 He P4 1YP°J. ^ ID 2 8 Q Pl �y Pt O / O ' O i/ ku, ,,,,, 4,0 TOP OF.SGR WALL Pt Pt O O / TOP OF 5I'te HALL Pl \ 3L0'AFF. P4 IYP. P4 P4 TYP. T P3 P2 P3 L __V__ D FL LINE 6RN1D FLR LINE _-- 6RND FLR LINE r- O'-O"AFF. B --1 t SIDEYVLK PARKING I LT�' I J °KEYNOTES I ATAS INTERNATWNAt, CURVED METAL ROOF O LEFT-SIDE ELEVATION SY511M.COLOR INTERNATIONAL, SLATEINC.C.CURVY SCALE: 3/16"..1'-0" 2 KAYAEDR WINDOWS AND ENTRY SYSTEM,COLOR ANTIQUE BRONZE YV INTERPANE tTB-320 GLASS. 3 STAINLESS STEEL RAILING H/GLASS PANELING. 4 OUTLINE OF ROOF BEYOND, RIE LINE 5 FINISH FLOOR LINE. 32'DG 3'AF.F. 6 1"xl'SCORE. l�/� 0TOP OF PARAPET /� 1 METAL ROLL-UP DOOR. q p CMU BLOCK SCREEN WALL Pt/STUCCO PAINT P4. 28'-8"A.F.F. 4 LOADING FIT OUTLINE.-4'AFF. Pt P1 10 LOWERED ENTRY DR TO UTILITY RM. P3 TOP OF PARAPET II WALL MOUNT LIGHT PACK FOR SITE LIGHTING. 1�=fJ'�Att. MOUNT ir IS'-O'MAX.ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR. (= 12 ROOF MOUNTED HYAC EQUIPMENT.ENT. ALL ROOF' 1 r , r I 1 I 1 r TOP OF PARAPET TOP EQUIPMENT TO BE SCREENED BY BULDING I I I Ir ® I 1 r , r , r l I PARAPET I ® I 1 © 113 CONCRETE SIDEWALK- L. ON 1 k Tk _1- J 0 EXTERIOR FINISH, PI DUNN-EDWARDS WHITE 21Ni 5P-2t2 CIA P5 DUNK-EDWARDS DRY OUTPOST DE 30T2 PT P4 DUN14-EDYIARDS Z-ZIP DE 3163 Pt PT Pt Pt PT TYP. 0- Co -� TOP OF SCR WALL i 0 4 / 4,0'AF.F. q / P4 5 O Pt lYp. - Pt q ORND FLR LINE \ I 5 FIN RR UNE --�' �- --�. 1 -2,0"AF.F. -- r I GRADE GRADE 1 (�--� -- I - L ----------_-- O RIGHT-SIDE ELEVATION SCALE:3/16"=1'-0' D[j ]IT{[`J[©H LEGAL DESCRIPTION w w o a I T t C T U w w l r M T a w l O w• A portion of Section 29,Township 11 South,Range 14 East,Gila and Solt River Bose and Meridian,Pima County,Arizono Tt C•Cw wti wOAO ts/OIM-6 13. 1ST FLOOR 8,490 SO.FT. SECOND FLOOR 1.957 SO.FL GUM TECHNOLOGY TOTAL 10,447 SO.FT. 0 NEW RESEARCH FACILITY CONTOUR INTERVAL = 1'-0- ELEVATIONS scale: 1' = 70'-0' Job Number:02010.000 Date: 12-18-02 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW VISTOSO COMMERCE LOOP Drawn By: SITS TOWN OF ORO VALLEY iewsi Ns Checked By: OV12-02-20 BOOK PAGE SHEET 2 OF 3 © 2002, INTERTECH ARCHITECTURAL INTERIORS, INC. 00K PAGE ,\,^,, = " R 0 KEYNOTES: �� 1 LOADING DOCK 20' x 40'. h�'`� 2 RECESSED TRASH RECEPTACLE \ Z: 3 CLASS 1 BICYCLE PARKING. SEE DTL 3/SHT. 1 R..$" • 4 CLASS II BICYCLE PARKING. SEE DTL 4/SHT. 1 UNDEVELOPED �� Fnd stone N} ACP Section 2r 5 LINE-OF-SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLES, NO STRUCT. OR VEGETATION ZONED:CPI , Section 2 SHALL BE LOCATED OR MAINTAINED SO AS TO INTERFERE W/ SIGHT VISIBILITY ALL LANDSCAPE TO MAINTAIN A CLEAR LINE OF SIGHT �_ ABOVE 30" AND BELOW 6'-0" WITHIN THE SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE. -- S89'52'29'E 2605.01 6 10' x 20' PARKING SPACE W/ 6'-0"Lx6"H CURB STOP @ 3'-0" \ / ii FROM CURB FACE WHERE SHOWN ON PLAN. SEE DTL 5/SHT. 1 \\ r ` N\ / / 7 NEW 4"THICK CONC. SIDEWALK PER PC/COT STD. OIL. 200. t ... \ / 8 NEW ASPHALT PAVING, TYPICAL. \\_ • / \s50.1 \ / 9 SITE LIGHTING WILL CONFORM TO ORO VALLY CODE. •�• 11 \ / � 10 NEW CONC. CURB ACCESS RAMP PER PC/COT STD. DTL. 207. n / ,(�/•-- , 13- v SEE DTL 12/SHT. 3 °j�.r 1© 6 �-�'� �'�,`6\ \ 0 11 10' x 17' PARKING SPACE W/ 3'-0" OVERHANG OF CURB. m SEE DTL 6/SHT. 1 o i \ a5\�•� �\ W 12 PUBLIC ART, SUBJECT TO TOWN OF ORO VALLEY ARTS ADVISORY ;a i'� \ �/. co BOARD APPROVAL; WRITTEN AGREEMENT W/ARTIST TO BE SUBMITTED N r i �� E TO ONE OF ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING ADMINISTRATOR i �. PRIOR TO CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. VERIFY COMPLIANT DOLLAR _ \ ! 6� \% \ \ z AMOUNT. PUBLIC ART SHALL COMPLY W/ALL PUBLIC ART y -_, 0 S:�\ i,\ T. 2`\, PROVISIONS IN SECTION 4-504 Of THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY s*'3. ) .... ���, \ REVISED ZONING CODE. v �'�,� �. ASA 13 HANDICAP PARKING SPACE PER ADA REQUIREMENTS. SEE v ,J DTL 7/SHT. 1 /.' \ o 1© )J \ �� 8'DRAIN PIPE \\ l��,;' —•� cD. �. FROM LOADING BAY 14 EXISTING SIDEWALK TO REMAIN. ,, \ •�•• ,`, `�•�.—- \•.. 215.56 LF A 1.02% 15 LANDSCAPE AREA o INV OUT=2856.2 o �•� '�' / e° \ i COMMERCIAL 16 REMOVE EXISTING VERTICAL CURB AND SIDE WALK. INSTALL NEW 0..\ _> ��ti I ZONED: CPI CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER PER PC/COT STD. DTL. 208 1 t ��`o. 'o N 17 NEW TYPE "2"VERTICAL CURB PER PC/COT STD. DTL 209. 18 NEW EXTRUDED CURB. s ' \o° 'SF / / �Q141 19 BUILDING.ONO POUR LV2/SHATL 1 CURB AND SIDEWALK. TYPICAL AROUND 5� 2863.50 F.F.E. \` 20 3'-0" MASONRY PATIO WALL, SEE DTL 11/SHT. 3 21 EXISTING DEPRESSED CURB. /J '.�� / % 2 BUILDING TO STEP DOWN AT THIS POINT- \ / \ 23 PROPOSED SIGNAGE. SEE DTL 1/SHT. 1 N t � / �.�` '•! j �•.: �"�.,,�,J � \, � ' 24 CATCH BASIN. SEE DTL 13/SHT. 3 N � / �/ '• / I �, •f7,`\ �\ 25 6'-0" HIGH MASONRY SCREEN WALL. SEE DTL 11/SHT. 3 SIM. \ ,•`�'�\ sq 1 ,P•ROPbSED• / / y ., \ ® \ DET 1 N. a e r•••. \ 26 WATER HARVESTING AREA. /BUILDING / I \ • ,r�•\ `\ } BASIN VOLUME=.27 ACFT 27 18" CURB OPENING o o. 1ST F 00R= 7,962 SO.FT. / / o, R �� ZND JJeeOOR= 1,957 S0. FAT. l ' �''� \ 100 YEAR WSE=2862.76 / /TOTAL = 9,919 50. FT. d; 4 2 65.00 F.F.E. ,. r \ �. / BLDG. HEIGHT 32'-6 j � ���.,'•; •: � � \`\ 6 *N 2865.00 F.F.E. ` '� TYPE 4 CATCH BASIN(OUTLET) / UNDEVELOPED J • �, �U , \2863.3s ��i/• ,•: --, .c "\CO ..�••'�': /y�3 ' S. ��%" , •O `` '• �'. f • t ' . '*: • \ SET 'X'ON o• 1+ :� ,� / CONCRETE 0_ ' < /A - /\ '/ •' „ ,,,). -1'• 0o , i p / I ,' „.....) b�c�� R 5 aA� _.,,, `. 4 0`'o 6x 7 DR8394 AIN GE C / / '+ . '"jG O o o, \,• '\ A MENT • S/// . / 4P j/i s#\\, O% ‘ "iii. \"En, %* B-6ii I ., vck .\\0 0 '`, ali• n o �� ,� � 4"RCP / , ` ,' \111 ......---,,f, �� IITVERT ELa2855.38 * ,-- --,r-,0-se i \ .2, IFI �1�� / 04' t eb�o �`� r 6L �� S'�Oa SQ� r _ / Isa j �ef // Q H( T IE R T E C W LEGAL DESCRIPTION 'm �\ A PICINITIIIICTUPII AL I N T a w l 0 w. A portion of Section 29,Township 11 South, Range 14 East, Gila and Solt River Base and Meridian, Pima County,Arizona / . O sT oc�c.� oaA9eT wove 1.■cr...nraoa°c. 0 �)c, / .01 1A GUM TECHNOLOGY CONTOUR INTERVAL= 1'-0" NJ " / ' • as NEW RESEARCH FACILITY / / • SO3�1 SITE PLAN Scale: 1" =20.-0' / SITE PLAN \ SCALE.1•=2CE 0• N Job Number.02010.000 / sly CONTOUR INTERVAL= t•-O' DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Date: 12-18-02 Invert- )b P j VISTOSO COMMERCE LOOP Drawn By: SHS / TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Ntestows Checked 8y: OV12-02.20 BOOK PAGE SHEET 3 OF 3 © 2002, INTERTECH ARCHITECTURAL INTERIORS, INC. GUM TECHNOLOGY - FINISH SCHEDULE W 1 - Kawneer Window System; Color: Antique Bronze 397X364 R1 - ATAS Roof System; Color: Slate Grey 20 P1 - Dunn Edwards Paint; Color: Dry Outpost DE3072 P2 - Dunn Edwards Paint; Color: Boulder Gray DE 3005 P3 - Dunn Edwards Paint; Color: White Zin SP 212 P4 - Dunn Edwards Paint; Color: Z-Zip DE 3163 GUM TECHNOLOGY P1 W1P2 P3 P4 0 R] CD ts; w^' CO T:5 (see reverse side for schedule) rt MINUTES OF THE ORO VALLEY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 11, 2003 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11,000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE REGULAR MEETING CALL TO ORDER: 6:01 p.m. ROLL CALL: Present Jim Vogelsberg, Chair Clark Reddin,Member(6:10 p.m.) Richard Feinberg, Member Al Kunisch,Member(6.45 p.m.) Nancy Mager, Vice Chair Mary Caswell,Member Absent Jeff Weatherford, Member Others Present: Bayer Vella, Senior Planner Craig Civalier,Development Review Division Manager David Ronquillo, Planner I Thomas Keiran,Planner I Kristina Curry, Secretary II REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF JANUARY 14, 2003 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MINUTES Minutes were approved with corrections. CONSENT AGENDA A. O V 13-03-04,ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A CUSTOM HOME, LOT 31 IN THE SUNNYSLOPE SUBDIVISION,PARCEL 225-141-580 The applicant has submitted a custom home for review. C. 0V13-03-001, OWNER/APPLICANT KARTER KAY REQUESTS ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL FOR A CUSTOM HOME TO BE LOCATED AT 10995 N. BROADSTONE DRIVE, FAIRWAY VILLAGE SUBDIVISION LOT 12, PARCEL 224240490. The proposal is for a single story three bedroom home. The property is zoned El Conquistador Country Club Planned Area Development, Area"C". 2/11/2003 Development Review Board Minutes Page 3 2. OV12-02-21, THE WLB GROUP, REPRESENTING SCOTT STITELER, REQUESTS APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 5 PARCEL N SUBDIVISION, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF NORTH RANCHO VISTOSO BLVD., APPROXIMATELY ONE-HALF MILE SOUTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF NORTH RANCHO VISTOSO BLVD. AND WEST MOORE ROAD,PARCEL 219-53-004Y. Thomas Keiran introduced the staff report into the record. Staff recommended approval of the preliminary plat for a portion of Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 5 Parcel N, Lots 1-28, subject to the conditions in Exhibit C. Staff Conditions: 1. Dedicate a 100' Public Recreational Easement along the existing WAPA line easement. 2. Add a General Note that states: "The Open Space Trade is conditional upon the following items being satisfied: a. Dedication of a 15' wide non-motorized public recreational easement along the northern limits of the property. b. The developer shall either create or provide an in lieu fee for the creation of Trail # 311, identified in the Town's Trail Task Force Report. The trail shall include at a minimum a 15 wide trail of stabilized decomposed granite. The associated 5' landscape buffers must be provided as well. The designs of the trail shall be approved by the Town's Parks and Recreation Administrator and be included before a building permit is issued. c. A public Ramada and associated landscaping will be built at the intersection of the new Trail#311 and the WAPA trail. The Ramada will also be dedicated to the Town for public recreational use. The designs of the trail shall be approved by the Town's Parks and Recreation Administrator and be included before a building permit is issued. 3. Amend General Note 12 to state: "Maximum permitted building height is 30', two (2) stories (Lots 1-6 limited to one (1) story). 4. Add a General Note that states: "A license agreement required in order to locate the landscape buffer yard in the Rancho Vistoso Boulevard right-of-way must be obtained before the Final Plat is approved". 5. Add zoning information and street names to the locator map. 6. Discuss erosion control methods to prevent further erosion along east side of lots 25-28 in the Drainage Report. 7. OVZCR Sec.4-305.C.7: Provide local datum for project. 8. Add elevations to show how concentration point 9 (CP9) drains in Sheet 2. 9. On sheet three, provide details for how the front portions of lots 25 — 28 will drain per OVZCR Sec. 15-302.A.3. 10.All Conditions must be addressed prior to Town Council review of the preliminary plat. Chairman Vogelsberg questioned whether the 30' street side buffer would be sufficient if the Town ever needed access to the Right of Way to widen the road. Craig Civalier answered that the width of Rancho F:\Minutes\DRB\2003\February 11,2003 minutes.doc Minutes approved on 3/11/2003 2/11/2003 Development Review Board Minutes Page 5 subject to conditions listed in Exhibit A with Land Trade Option 1. 4. OV12-02-20, INTERTECH ARCHITECTURAL INTERIORS INC, REPRESENTING GUM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, REQUESTS APPROVAL OF A LANDSCAPE PLAN; LOCATED WITHN RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 2, DIRECTLY SOUTH OF THE HUSKY NOZZLE CORPORATION, PARCEL#22302014B David Ronquillo introduced the staff report into the record. Staff recommended approval of the landscape plan for Gum Technology. MOTION: Moved, seconded (Mager/Kunisch)and carried by a 6-0 vote to approve OV12-02-20. 5. OV13-03-06, INTERTECH ARCHITECTURAL INTERIORS INC, REPRESENTING GUM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, REQUESTS ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL FOR AN OFFICE & LABORATORY FACILITY; LOCATED WITHIN RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 2, DIRECTLY SOUTH OF THE HUSKY NOZZLE CORPORATION, PARCEL#22302014B David Ronquillo introduced the staff report into the record. Staff recommended architectural approval for Gum Technology with the conditions listed in Exhibit A. Staff Conditions: 1. All signage for this project must be approved by the DRB Agenda Review Committee by a separate permit. 2. The front entranceway to the building must utilize benches and/or planters for pedestrian scale features. Vice Chairman Mager questioned why there was a flat expanse of wall proposed along the back of the facility; why were no windows, architectural details, or landscaping provided? Steve Shields with Intertech answered that that area would house the manufacturing portion of the facility, and they would prefer to keep that area free from windows for reasons of dust/pest control. He added that the expanse would be broken up visually through color deviation and grooves in the stucco, as well as landscaping. MOTION: Moved, seconded (Reddin/Kunisch) and carried by a 6-0 vote to approve OV13-03-06, subject to conditions listed in Exhibit A. Recess: 7:40 Reconvene: 7:45 F:\Minutes\DRB12003\February 11,2003 minutes.doc Minutes approved on 3/11/2003 2/11/2003 Development Review Board Minutes Page 7 13. Provide proof of a shared parking agreement from Home Depot or omit any reference to the availability of nearby parking in the Alternative Compliance Parking Analysis per OVZCR Section 27.6C.2.b.2. 14. Revise the Alternative Compliance Parking Analysis letter discussion of Shared Parking to comply with the standards of shared parking set forth in OVZCR Section 27.6.D.4. 15. Include Storage Area enclosure details on sheet 3. 16. Revise General Note 19 to reflect change in design vehicle to SU-30. 17. On sheet 2, add delta data to curve data of the property boundaries per title report. 18. On sheet 2, revise curb opening note to reflect condition 25a. 19. On sheet 2, clarify with elevations drainage west of Retail building. 20. On sheet 2, revise finish elevations north of the workshop to meet 0.5% minimum slope requirement. Spot elevations depict less than 0.5% slope. 21. On sheet 2, clarify with elevations detention basin drainage flow pattern. 22. On sheet 2, provide easement documentation for sanitary sewer Mill to existing MH. 23. Provide a schedule for the maintenance of the first flush/detention basin on the development plan. 24. On sheet 3, provide more detail between the basin and sidewalk to accurately depict grading. 25. Drainage Report Items. a. Remove curb depressions and replace with full sized curb at concentration point 4(CP4) to provide a broad crested weir that will accommodate first flush and code requirements (page 11) per OVZCR Section 4-504-D-5. Revise appropriate notes on sheet 2 and details on sheet 3 to reflect change to design. b. Correct page 11 (2nd paragraph, 4th sentence) CP3 should read CP4. 26.All the aforementioned conditions must be addressed prior to Town Council review of the Development Plans. Member Kunisch asked if there would be a seating area outside for customers, Ed Dutschi answered affirmatively that there would be a seating area outside where patrons could watch their cars being serviced Chairman Vogelsberg questioned if the retention basin between Oracle Road and the proposed development would directly discharge into the public drainage way. Craig Civalier answered that the retention basin is a first flush, water harvesting basin that will be heavily landscaped to be used as a buffer between Oracle Road and the proposed development. Member Feinberg inquired if staff had any idea what type of retail stores were being proposed. Bayer Vella voiced that none of the uses behind Big 0 Tire would be allowed to generate traffic levels that would equal or exceed that of a restaurant unless they obtained a Shared Parking Agreement. Ed Dutschi stated that they have been approached by several prospective tenants, such as Three Day Blinds. Member Reddin posed the possibility of requiring that this development have a Shared Parking Agreement with Home Depot. Thomas Keiran answered that this would not be necessary if the DRB found the Alternative Parking Analysis to be adequate. If not, the applicant is prepared to redesign the layout to meet the code requirements. F:\Minutes\DRB\2003\February 11, 2003 rninutes.doc Minutes approved on 3/11/2003 2/11/2003 Development Review Board Minutes Page 9 Chairman Vogelsberg questioned if the irrigation could be retrofitted to use reclaimed water. Eric Baird of TMHS Associates answered affirmatively. MOTION: Moved, seconded (Caswell/Reddin) and carried by a 6-0 vote to approve OV12-02-19 Landscape Plan, subject to conditions listed in Exhibit A. 8. OV13-03-002; ARCHITECTURAL TEAM THREE, REPRESENTING COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT PROPERTIES, INC. REQUESTS ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL FOR A COMMERCIAL BUILDING TO BE LOCATED IN THE ROONEY RANCH PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT AREA B, NORTHEAST OF THE HOME DEPOT, PARCEL 22008001J. Thomas Keiran introduced the staff report into the record. Staff recommended continuing Agenda Item 8 to the March DRB meeting so that the applicant's recently submitted architectural proposals could be reviewed. MOTION: Moved, seconded (Mager/Kunisch) and carried by a 6-0 vote to continue OV13-03-002 to the March DRB meeting. STAFF REPORT Bayer Vella reported that on February 5, 2003 Town Council reviewed a rezoning request on Desert Sky Way and Oracle Road. A commercial development is being proposed, which DRB will eventually review in the forum of development plan. Additionally, he made known that a study session for Town Council regarding the Beztek site would be held on February 12, 2003,beginning with a Site Tour. As the agenda for the next scheduled DRB meeting was fairly light, Bayer Vella suggested incorporating a study session on Open Space Trade and Riparian Areas. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved, seconded (Caswell/Kunisch) and carried by a 6-0 vote to adjourn the February 11, 2003 Development Review Board Meeting at 9:20 PM. Respectfully submitted by, Recording Secretary, Kristina Curry F:\Minutes\DRB\2003\February 11,2003 minutes.doc Minutes approved on 3/11/2003 ti JP0-EY 4,9 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY oho O COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 6111) Planning and Zoning • Building Safety 11000 N.La Canada Drive,Oro Valley,AZ 85737•(520)229-4800•Fax(520)742-1022 Oro Valley Public Library 1305 W.Naranja Drive,Oro Valley,AZ 85737• (520)229-5300•Fax(520)229-5319 141111 "--- - Parks and Recreation �°UN D Et) �g� 680 W.Calle Concordia,Oro Valley,AZ 85737•(520)229-5050•Fax(520)797-2202 February 19, 2003 Steve Shields Intertech Architecture 6089 E. Grant Road Tucson, AZ 85712 Fax: 298-8299 RE: OV13-03-06, PROPOSED ARCHITECTURE FOR THE GUM TECHNOLOGY WITHIN RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 2, PARCEL #22302014B Dear Steve: At their regular meeting of February 11, 2003, the Development Review Board conditionally approved the architecture for the Gum Technology. The conditions listed in Exhibit "A" are attached. Please contact me at 229-4817 if you have any questions Very truly yours, David Ronquillo Planner I cc: Shirley Gay, Development Coordinator File www.townoforovalley.com