Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOV130345 -2r'03/2aw13 37 5207421822 tat ►� F 1:�_ �iAt,L�Y q�,j "41',L; 01 Planning&Zoning Division 11 000 N. La Canada Drive,Oro Valley AZ 85737 Phone; (520)229-4800 Fax: (520) 742-1022 DEC www.townoforovalieycom 8 �®� APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROJECT ARCHITECTURE DATE; /Z /� 0�j � _oV CASE NO.: t' - 3 - S_ office use only) PROJECT NAME: Svc. --�-�-.—..--�...�....T..�.,,.....�.-�.�. i£ Q. SUBDIVISION Na19H u#vop LOT#J—2 ay- LOCATION i ADDRESS: S. � L t( /+o (.� `oS a Lv ZONING2A D PARCEL,NUMBER: A/ stzEYL__ S 000 1 MODEL NAMES OR NUMBERS /'9 A mod /(�'OO 4 Elie / APPLICANT: L f'' avZ � _� �'_ ADDRESS:3/ � • r31.-iN c.E go___ PHONE NO.: - 57.490 FAX PROPERTY OWNER: ,►.,, ( `�,- � ,(2.ift, MiLzis 1,0v 7 if, ADDRESS. E Lou-) L ' z01 85-7 e PHONE NO.: f 130,3e) FAX NO; 6ZZ-g 656, DEVELOPMENT RE ARD HARING DA /1/5 SIGNATURE; • C- DATE: /2 B o Sub kl-ll eats: ------ Fees - — copy of 24x36 elevations and floor plan 1r4 or 118 scale copy of 24x36 site plan 40 scale (Custom Lots Only) Typical lot lay out for subdivision _ Models-Lot fit analysis for subdivisions ✓✓ .Cut sheets for lighting(All Commercial Projects,Custom homes,and Model plans) Fifteen copiespf the following: N-✓✓ Dimensioned Elevations of all four sides of all buildings and floor plan(11"x 17"format) Co ial projects require color drawings or photographs of elevations(8 x 11"format) re a g gs W�SL yite Plan(11"xfoota 17"format)ofbuiIdin Color chips of body,trim and roof tiles(8'A"by 11'format)Commercial and Residential Applications will not be accepted without all required materials. �1 03/2E103 _2: _° 5 21 22 1 �kJ^ rat ►Je!U- DRB SUBMITTAL CALENDAR 2004 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY DEC 1 8 200 Architecture, Signs, Misc. ALL sUBM/rrALs ARE DUE AT NOON SUBMITTAL DEADLINES SCHEDULED MEETING DATE THURSDAY TUESDAY C12/18/03 $1--%e7 1/13/04 1/15/04 2/10/03 2/12/04 3/09/04 3/18/04 4/13/04 4;15/04 5/11/04 5/13/04 6/08/04 6/17/04 7/13/04 7/15/04 3/10/04 8/12/04 9/14/04 9/16/04 10/12/04 10/144/04 11/09/04 "1 1/12/(}4 12/14/04 12/16/04 01/11/05 If holiday falls on due date, submittals wi d e due the day before_ PLEASE NOTE: "PUBLIC COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE SUBMITTAL TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE STAFF REPORT; THEY MUST BE RECEIVED NO LATER DATES THAN ONE WEEK AFTER THE SUBMITTAL DATE TO BE INCLUDED IN PACKETS DISTRIBUTED TO THE HEARING BODY." THE HEARING DATES SHOWN ARE THE EARLIEST DATES THAT THE PROJECT cAN BE REVIEWED BY THE BOARD. INCOMPLETE OR INADEQUATE SUBMITTALS MAY DELAY A PROJECT. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 11000 N.LA CANADA DRIVE ORO VALLEY,AZ 85737 PHONE: 229-4800 FAX: 742-1022 RECEIPT ****************************************************************************** REFERENCE NUMBER: DS0300695 RECEIPT #03P00753 SITE ADDRESS: TAXCODE: DATE: 12/18/2003 TIME: 10:16 AM COMP TYPE: MISCELLANEOUS RECEIPT TYPE: DESCRIPTION: DRB ARCHITECTURE FOR RANCHO VISTOSO NB 5N APPLICANT: PHILLIP CARHUFF OWNER: Notation: Receipt By:DRM ******************************************************************************************* DRM PAID BY: Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 20785 320 . 00 TOTAL: 320.00 FEES PAID: Description Account Code Current Pmts Development Review Board 001-000-408 320.00 TOTAL: 320.00 Account#: Ending Balance: $ °v w KREBS CARHUFF •���• PHIIIP A. CARHUFF,A.I.A. A R C H I T E C T S,INC. DIANE KREBS CARHUFF, A.I.A. January 14, 2004 Susana Montana AN 14 2004 Planner II Community Development Department Town of Oro Valley 11000 N. La Canada Ave. Oro Valley, AZ 85737 RE: 1st review comments DRB submittal for new model homes for Cutshaw-Yeager, LLC. Page 1 of 1 Dear Susana: Per our phone conversation yesterday please find the attached 15 sets of revised 11"x17"DRB submittal drawings and one full size 24"x 36"copy for formal re-submittal for the February DRB meeting. We understand the WLB Group for a February approval meeting submitted the final plat as well and request that these two submittals be reviewed concurrently if at all possible. You are in possession of our previous DRB submittal documents and application from 12/18/03 so we also respectfully request you discard the previous sets of plans, or have us pick them up and keep the material sample boards, application form and fee for the February meeting. Please call or fax if you require additional information. I will follow up with you tomorrow to make sure you are O.K. with this re-submittal Very truly yours, Philip A. Carhuff, AIA Cc: File, Dave Cutshaw via fax 622-8636 3149 E. PRINCE ROAD SUITE 151 TUCSON, ARIZONA 85716-1227 (520) 577-4560 FAX(520) 577-4599 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY STAFF REPORT TO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING DATE: February 10, 2004 TO: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD FROM: Susana Montana, Planner II OV13-03-45, PHILLIP CARHUFF OF KREBS CARHUFF ARCHITECTS, REPRESENTING CUTSHAW-YAEGER LLC, SEEKS APPROVAL OF ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND ELEVATIONS FOR MODEL HOME NUMBERS 1400A, 1400B, 1600A AND 1600B FOR THE "AGUILA AT VISTOSO" SUBDIVISION (RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 5, PARCEL N) LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF NORTH RANCHO VISTOSO BLVD., APPROXIMATELY ONE-HALF MILE SOUTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF NORTH RANCHO VISTOSO BLVD. AND WEST MOORE ROAD, PARCEL 219-53-004Y. BACKGROUND: Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 5, Parcel N, now called"Aguila at Vistoso", Preliminary Plat was approved by the Town Council on March 19, 2003. The Applicant, Mr. Scott Stiteler of Stellor Homes, requested a six month time extension on the Plat which was granted by Town Council on October 1, 2003. The Applicant is now seeking a revised Preliminary Plat to reflect the removal of one lot in favor of installation of a gated entry for the subdivision at that location. Stellor Homes is selling Lots 1 through 24 to Cutshaw-Yaeger, LLC to develop. Cutshaw-Yaeger is the Applicant for the subject model homes. Together, Stellor Homes and Cutshaw-Yaeger have submitted a Final Plat and Improvement Plan for the revised Plat. Concurrent with review of those applications, Cutshaw- Yaeger seeks approval of the architecture for the model homes proposed for Lots 1 through 24 of the subdivision. The new Lots 1 through 24 would be built by Cutshaw-Yaeger LLC. The model homes would not be built on Lots 25 through 28. To date,Lots 25 through 28 would be built by Stellor Homes. The "Aguila at Vistoso" subdivision encompasses 10.77 acres with a total of 28 lots for single-family, detached homes. Approximately 6.1 acres of the property is zoned Rancho Vistoso PAD High Density Residential (RV HDR) and the remainder is designated Open Space. The development standards are consistent with the existing residential lots for Medium Density Residential lots within Rancho Vistoso. SUMMARY: The four model homes, Models 1400A and B and 1600A and B fit the small lots of the subdivision, meeting all the setback requirements of the Rancho Vistoso PAD. The PAD requires 20 feet front setbacks; 5 feet rear setbacks; and 5 feet or zero setbacks for common wall or zero lot line developments. The subject models homes would provide a 20 foot front setback; a 5 foot rear setback and a 3 foot and 6 inch (3' 6") setback on one side and a 6 foot and 6 inch(6' 6") setback on the other side. OVERVIEW OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT: The design of the four models represent a derivative-Territorial style architecture featuring: • A flat roof of varying heights, the flat roof plane in the front and rear elevations is broken up by a red- tiled sloping roof; TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Staff Report to Development Review Board, OV13-03-45, February 10, 2004 Page 2 of 5 • Doors and windows set flush with the wall surface; • A stucco exterior finish; • A walled courtyard to the front entry; • Earth tone color; • The homes are single-story with a 2-car garage facing the street; and • The house entry can be viewed from the street; The model homes vary in the following ways: Model Living Optional Garage Total Arch.features Number space space space space 1400A 1,405 225 sf 455 sf 1,860 to Dual-paned windows; sloped den 2,085 stucco coping 1400B Same as Same as Same as Same as Dual-paned windows with 1400A 1400A 1400A 1400A simulated multi-paned lights; & Brick capped parapet coping 1600A 1,621 174 sf 451 sf 2,072 sf Same as 1400A den to 2,246 sf 1600B Same as Same as Same as Same as Dual-paned windows with 1600A 1600A 1600A 1600A simulated multi-paned lights; & Brick capped parapet coping COMPLIANCE ANALYSIS Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised, Chapter 16 Design Guidelines. The following features positively address Chapter 16 Design Guidelines: • Homes reflect a Territorial-style architecture. • Varied roof line silhouette: Models feature flat roofs with sections of mission tiled sloped roof. • Design buildings with consideration given to all sides of a building(treat all four sides equally): Each elevation has fenestration to avoid blank walls. • Break up mass and bulk: front,rear and left elevations have varied building planes and front and rear elevations have covered porches; front elevations have walled courtyards. • Homes are earth toned and use stucco exterior finish. The project meets the Design Guidelines of Chapter 16, OVZCR with the exception of Sec. 16-103.E.3.b which states: "De-emphasize garages on street frontages. Techniques for varying garage treatments include: 1. The garage should consist of not more than 50% of the total building frontage. 2. At least 50% of garage doors should be flush with or recessed from the front of the house. The street-facing garage of the subject models represents 54%to 56%of the front elevation. The garages project from 16 to 19 feet from the house. The lot size is small and the Applicant believes that a 2-car garage is the smallest size that the market could bear and,therefore,he could not make the garage smaller or place it elsewhere on the lot. The Applicant seeks to address the above-referenced Design Guideline by minimizing the appearance of the garage in the following ways: • Minimize the architectural details on or above the garage doors; , TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Staff Report to Development Review Board, OV13-03-45, February 10, 2004 Page 3 of 5 • Paint the garage the same color as the house; and • Add a 4 foot high courtyard wall,with landscaping,to create a more visually-dominant house and entry feature,thereby diminishing the visual effect of the garage. These measures have been incorporated as part of the Project and are reflected in the revised plans attached to this report. GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE: The architecture complies with the General Plan's Community Design Element policies in that the design and color scheme would blend with the natural environment. All sides of the building would be "coherently designed and treated"(Policy 9.1.F) and would incorporate features that"reduce the apparent size and bulk of buildings"(Policy 9.1.G). PUBLIC PRESENTATION: Pursuant to Resolution (R) 98-31, "all presentations before Boards, Commissions and Council of rezonings, subdivision plats, development plans, and planned area developments must be formatted to be shown on the Town's projection system or overhead system. The Planning and Zoning Administrator; however, may exempt certain projects." A presentation must be designed to insure that the audience, staff, and voting body can view the graphics. Examples of acceptable computer formats are Power Point, Arc View, a videotape presentation, presentation boards and/or overhead transparences. The Applicant is responsible for the development, presentation, and coordination of all presentation materials. If an applicant does not conform to the aforementioned resolution,the item may be continued due to non-compliance. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the architectural plans for OV 13-03-45, Model Homes Number 1400A and B and 1600A and B for the"Aguila at Vistoso"subdivision, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit"A". SUGGESTED MOTIONS: I move to approve OV 13-03-45, Model Homes Number 1400A and B and 1600A and B for the "Aguila at Vistoso" subdivision, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit"A". OR I move to approve OV 13-03-45, Model Homes Number 1400A and B and 1600A and B for the "Aguila at Vistoso" subdivision, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit "A" as well as the following condition(s) OR I move to deny OV 13-03-45, Model Homes Number 1400A and B and 1600A and B for the "Aguila at Vistoso" subdivision,based on the following finding(s) . Attachments: 1. Exhibit A 2. January 9, 2004 re-submittal letter 3. Model Plans 4. Color Samples . • i TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Staff Report to Development Review Board, OV13-03-45, February 10,2004 Page 4 of 5 C: Applicant: Phillip Carhuff,Fax: (520) 577-4599 Steve Oliverio,WLB Group,Fax: (520) 881-7492 Scott Stiteler, Stellor Homes, 5215 N. Sabino Canyon Road, Suite 100, Tucson,AZ 85750 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Staff Report to Development Review Board, OV13-03-45, February 10, 2004 Page 5 of 5 Exhibit A to OV13-03-45, Model Homes 1400A and B and 1600A and B for"Aquila at Vistoso" Subdivision, Parcel No. 219-53-004Y 1. Should the approved Final Plat for Lots 1 through 24 vary from the lot configuration shown on Sheet A- 1 of this application,the subject model home plans for these lots may be brought back to the Development Review Board for reconsideration. 2. The Applicant shall install a capped spark arrester on the chimney top. All vents and chimneys must terminate per appliance manufacturer listings. The fixture is subject to review by the Planning&Zoning Administrator and the Town Building Official. 3. All flat-roofed segments of the structure must have roof coatings painted to match the exterior facades using a non-reflective paint material. 4. All roof-mounted equipment must be concealed from view from all sides of the building pad. KREBS CARHUFF Ile p ri lb, . PHILIP A. CARHUFF,A.I.A. A R C H I T E C T S,INC. DIANE KREBS CARHUFF,A.I.A. January 9, 2004 Susana Montana JAN 0 9 2004 Planner II Community Development Department Town of Oro Valley 11000 N. La Canada Ave. Oro Valley, AZ 85737 RE: 1st review comments DRB submittal for new model homes for Cutshaw-Yeager,LLC. Page 1 of 1 Dear Susana: Per our phone conversation 1/2/04 please find the attached revised DRB submittal drawings for your approval to proceed with printing and formal re-submittal on 1/15/04 for the February DRB meeting. Our understanding of the design changes you suggested for Model 1400 A&B are: /1. Sheets A-2 &A-4 Elevations#3 and#4 omit the pop out lintel over the garage door. v 2. Sheets A-2 and A-4 Elevations#4 and#5 add 4' high masonry and stucco screen wall with landscaping to mitigate garage in Model 1400A. -/3. Sheets A-2 &A-4 Elevation#7 add (3) 18" square clerestory windows to the garage. Note other minor window adjustments. Our understanding of the design changes you suggested for Model 1600 A&B are: Vf. Sheets A-3 and A-5 Elevation#5 add(3) 18" square clerestory windows at the garage and at the great room to match. The windows are not shown on the plans yet due to the plan being cut below the 5' level, but will be scheduled on the construction drawings. Sheets A-3 and A-5 Elevations#3 and#7 add 4' masonry screen wall finished with painted stucco. \i4 Also add (1) 15 gal. Mesquite tree next to the garage behind the screen wall. These additions are to mitigate the effects of the garage. On all designs the garage door shall be painted to match the house. The roof color will be desert tan to match the house also. Finally, per your request see the attached color renderings we submitted to Rancho Vistoso for color reference only(We had these already and did not add the screen walls). Please call or fax if you require additional information. I will follow up with you Monday afternoon with a phone call if I do not hear from you first. Very truly yours, Philip A. Carhuff, AIA Cc: File, Dave Cutshaw via fax 622-8636 3149 E. PRINCE ROAD SUITE 151 TUcsoN,ARIZONA 85716-1227 (520)577-4560 FAX (520)577-4599 lb III aq-� PROPERTY LINE c� k,.. Z a t\�V�` 416 5'REAR �` ` \\\+--• aAll=WHOM WV �'�`' ,'<I. O t \w SETBACK �..\, ` TOW I II aM>fs lo! ♦L\, ��m25 30 i \ � � ' ��it \ ; �M 1�„ -���� 36 3 Le,:LOT Iota t-sn Woo .. b LINE,TYP. : ; , .. 5 i 1s�oow a1/2,friaif � THIS PROJECT 1 •DE T.. II \.D 11 -° \ is\ILTRATE 20'FRONT .'. ' ; ,' \,. SETBACK �\,. . • 1 ---- r--� LOCATION MAP ODI a I • • PORTION OF SEC.25&36,T.11 S R 13 E IZ&S.R.M..TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, a PIMA COUNTY,ARIZONA DRIVEWAY • • ••�•_�__• •_•..• SCALE:3'.1 MILE I6" • 35 0" 6" ` V 1 1 1 I ®TYP"LOT LAYOUT 1 1` I I 1 I 1 11 1 I UNSUBDIVIDED NEIGHBORHOOD 6 I I1 , 1 PHIUP A I y CARH7VF I N89D 50'40"E 992.96'I I 1 CZCM 1 t"% I I I LOT FIT SCHEDULE I I 75 5 d ` 9� 6s' F- ---is--'— 3 9 � 7a ;I ! 1 +!-� I 1 ti p, i;, Q,' �, I. 1 8 b 8 b I x I LOT 6 Is ;'t LOT 7 N! LOT 18 LOT 19 NI 1 w w. w w9 Q I I I - , sI2 �� I7, "sI I !r At[�0303I1 1 1' 1 1� 1 1 ,w';•l��i�yii,$ § $ $ > 11 I I1jji ::±j:ii "° j1 1 ;I LOT 28 .i���'!r"1��i►�"' LOT2 • • I . I1 ----- ----y � I--�t-- - 19 L�- ----95----h� i `�l� /LOT 3 • • • • I I t t 1 i i i I 1 ♦ Kr- = Abair LOT • • CO I I aI LOT 4i i LOT5 . • • I I 11IK B ARHUFF• • • Q I 95 9 R.E S C• • < NOTETHSLOTPRODUCES L----- 100' 9v 1 ' 1I I 105' 1, 1 V J Y i I LOT 27Q I ARCHITECT. S,INC. LOT 8 • • HOUSES. I I Y I a) 1 y ,t; y 1 1 c., '1 t �/ 1 3149 E.P$I:VCE ROAD Sort"y.151 LOT 9 • • • • 0 I 141 g LOT 4 ( 4 I 14 LOT 9 i 14 LOT 16 < WI W 1 W 0 LOT 21 .'I i \ Q I TucSON,ARazo\A, £5716-1227 LOT 10 1 I— I I 1( 65-m f° I I n $ , I Phone:.(520)577-4561) • • 1 w 1 w T 1 w 1 W L LOT 11 r I m 1 i 1— I o W 1I� ------ ---I Fax:(52(1)5?7-45I • • • • II r—�� o -a�- IIi --r Q�-- 100'_— --_ �__—ate-- r. i•----95----o rill LOT12 VJ I I �„{�._—__—���_ } _� I— 1_ o }, Q 1 FFZ ¢ 1 4__---—__•v t • • • • ¢yl 11 1 t O 4 1 1 //''�� I LOT13 • • • • I I 1 ,� ¢ I 1- >• 1 ¢i 1 1� ¢ ¢b') 1 V 1 LOT 14 • • • • I > I ICI ¢ LOT 3 LL I > 14 - LOT 10 W E�;1 LOT 15 LL, I — I g LOT 22 ¢'1 I i NEW MODEL HOME t "' R 1 t $ ¢mi t i i 1 �ni t 1 LOT 15 • • I 1 1 — 1 y5' I , 95 �, , CC I ys, ,I i �(/LOT 26 i LOT 16 • • < NOTE:THS LOT PRODUCES Q L c I�- 95 i 1pp I , / I FOR:CUTSHAVI�YEAGER,LLC A5'REAR YARD FOR ALL I I rr----9s---T-- //�" i , 1 i 1 1 ` LOT 17 • • HOUSES. = 1 I LL 1 \,i I 1 1 : 1 1 _ LOT 19 • • • • I 0 I I 4I LOT 2I. LOT 11 ,' LOT 14 `�I I` LOT 23 4i_- ---- --- -- —� NEIGHBORHOORANCHO D 5 PARCEL N • • Z I 'a I I I 1 ;I; 1 I I I LOTS 1 THRU 28 LOT 20 -----------_ ---- '--- �,--- ------r-- I I'---4'-•---- .----r1 1 1 LOT 21 • • • • 95 I-- 95 , , Q I ► 1 I 111 1 ORO VALLEY DRB SUBMITTAL LOT 22 • • (Ø *ZMN I, !• • I LO 12 >9 �Ii d 24 I LOTLor2a • • • • 1EA) ,Q L11 `° 1 1 I GATE PRIVATE ST. • I r`1 w 1 I - - -- --- -- - -- - - -- - -- S9OD 00'00"E 1194.68' PROJECT NO. I APP; • .�E I '" C/P'/DRB/%OA P03-6500 I I % DAM DECEMBER 18,2003 1. I I I VISTOSOI� HILLS L I BK. 44 �� ���` �� / As Indicated PAC/MKC I I . 48 PG. PZ PR• E T MANA ER �"�"°*uSUBDIVISION PLAN ®SUBDIVISION PLAN 1":40'-P WAM1M0 wreEn A-1 410 V) (2 0 f • CUTS " t- • r' .f 6 a ( v b 1 • (2) - ' —7. ] • • I: ••: ':* : ' . - •• • .. . .. ,___H:....,, u . . , . .. ......... ... ... .. . . ............ . . • ......_. . . . . .. ••. . • . . • • . .. . . (i) .... .• •. . _•L-,7.-.„L: H, • . . . . . • • • . • .;• . . • 1 .„ ,„, .. . . ...,•• •.. .,,..,,, ...,. .:•...... . A :'.A.,. . . .. .... .. . .. . .. F.F.E. _ • F.F.E. •-(8) (11) (IS) (5) —(9) —(2) t I 1 6'-6• 16'-0" 1 18-0" i3'-6"I MODEL 1400A FRONT ELEVATION ®MODEL 1400A W/OPTIONAL DEN FRONT ELEVATION 1/4'=TS 1/4'=1'-0" I PORCH I MASTER BEDROOM I I • f , T . " 1 I t • ELEVATION KEYNOTES I - I1 : GREAT ROOM I ('l. • -• • .•. - • 1 1.STUCCO WALL SYSTEM 1`\/Jy •,t, '�'.#.R:_ .. PAINTED FIELD COLOR- I - 1 .:,':ji:.,..r:r ,.:"f':y;:• .,.,_r..,..,.• -. 2.STUCCO POPOLTT,PAINT W! Iv _ - -i."�5 •..: :.:•' ;art..•#; ,$.#,s -r3. - TRIM I MBATH /' • r .#ts�:s:;#i:>i-,-,.;tr .+r,;zt:v'••;;::•.. - C ECOPING. •t.� ,•<,..,:3.,.Y,•.,.:•t-,#.•.,•:,,t-,�,•., • 3.SLOP D STUCCO•� I ......... ........:.:Y c ::.x:S-C:-:.-.,ti3-..::.•.................... .....•. • • 4.STUCCO WINDCAN SILL. /� rn •• 5.WALL MOUNTED LIGHT I / �� -•• SCONCE.6.PAINfED WOOD BEAM AND I — I :•,,. •. - 1 I IDW tv 7.MISSION TILE ROOF. n I _ • I I b TRIM. 1z o yr I4' 3" 3'-0"�. 4'- - PAINTED WOOD FRONT DOOR W!112 DECORATIVE GLASS. I BEDROOM m -�, 9.PAINTED STEEL GARAGE DOOR. I KIT. N I - .�,," la \�, • .. .. • - -. 10.DUAL PANE ALUMINUM FRAME - ■� '� r�,' .�\ y - • • WINDOW W/STUCCO POPOUT •_ . • b SILL PAINTED TRIM COLOR I \ HALL ` i/ PH P 1f - I 11.MASONRY SCREEN WALL WITH b I �' I A. I • STUCCO. CAAHUFF FF BATH A A D- () 4e, .(7. I ALCOVE O ®I t� J rn ,l At, I I // PORCH ®MODEL 1400A LEFT ELEVATION 1/�j/ i iii I -- I & �1�ktievte I 1--- GARAGE I - 4 • 4161 i 1 •�sj� Y • •'_' C t}K Y#t trrt{Y rV~•}. •} t Y t t f s3` I 1W20'SETBACK' •' r i - I • ... - ...-.-. .. ! I t{r Ott 5,:���{::.r '6-6" I I AKRtCEBHSI CI kARC H1SU ,FrNEc.1 I • II I 3149 E.PRINCE.RuA2Sor1:151 • lhcson,AxtxoA 857161Z27■ Ib I Phone:(520)577456)I Fax(520)57745N IEI 99 ,' . . • , .. . . , . . . ....... . ...... ...: I I • -• . - _ _. F_F.E. • • I—• ---------------J:. :... NEWMODELHOME ®FLOOR PLAN MODEL 1400A 1405 GSF LIVNG W/455 SF GARAGE FOR:CUTSHAW-YEAGER,LLC 1/8"=1'-0" RANCHO MODEL 1400A REAR ELEVATION NEIGHBORHOOD 5 PA CEL N LOTS 1 T 0 1/4"=1'-0- vORO VALLEY DRB SUBMITTAL • I 1)61:111-7:. IEvmNx+ oaE rrsalrnoN m I AILCo �♦ ■ b "=_ b b MIL '° • .,.. c: DpEpN�2 GARAGE _ PROJECT NO ... ' —J — P03-6500 !. 1 -_--- DATE • ' .L 1• b DECEMBER 18,2003 DRAWN EY SCALP II — •— — .— . . • — — —-- — — F.F.OE 13•n 2,' o h As Indicated PAC/MKC r T TTT MARINO I. PLANS&ELEVATIONS FLOOR PLAN MODEL 1400A W/OPTIONAL DEN 225 S.F.1,630 MODEL 1400A ®MODEL 1400A RIGHT ELEVATION ®GSF LIVING. OI AItNO MASER (2) 4111 (1) (12) (3) (7) • E 4115 1" i. • -.--1' • ••'•••-:': ..••••.* • •---:• ';*: : .L... . •. . ... ' Al i :,•,-, :1•,..,.;:i....:::$5.•:',4".i...:::•I li.:14ii0:.i?..,.;*.t,j".•.U. fi A..:'Y#•... }#:':-...,:- Yi•e,.t,. .}{.••a`5T•{r• .>fir,. ...5:15Si:E0.:}i. �:. ..�. •�-••;:is y • .;.,.,. y . :#::a:, • 0 (6) N� I� b • b il . • • F.F.E. 1• — — — — — F.F.E� • — — — — — — _ — .. •— 0^ 0^ b I (2) - (9) (5) I6) (11)—' (4) (10) 'o IT-6• 21'-0" 18'-0' 6'-6` I tMODEL 1600A FRONT ELEVATION MODEL 1600A W/OPTIONAL DEN FRONT ELEVATION • •1 . I • b I PORCH eo I tv14STER o I BEDROOM • ,.-. III I • ELEVATION KEYNOTES , I -F I • . - - , .STUCCO WALL SYSTEM. b M BATH CQL. II PAINTED FIELD COLOR. X . '..:•••_ 2. OUT,PAINT W/ o I TRIM COLOR .. 3.SLOPED STUCCO COPING `D ® II • - - -- 4.STUCCO WINDOW SILL I 1. 1L G )I-JI 1—'l 5.WALL MOUNTED LIGHT ( .GREAT b 1" f�.. I I I I I I l I. I I` ROOM 6) t SCONCE. a b :.i••. - - 6.PAINTED WOOD BEAM AND -1 I g 13, . I . .. _ TRIM BEDROOM►2 - 7.MISSION TILE ROOF. •, `• 8I 0 I .. PAINTEDFRONT DOOR. _, WOOD 00 7 NE SS. W 1/2 DECORATIVE GLASS. ! C •• `-I • • • 9.PAINTED STEEL GARAGE DOOR. t l�'\\ ,, o.DUAL M COLOR. +[? 1 LL •,• _ t SCREEN WALL WITH , • •.•• .._• - STUCCOI b • I HALL t.MASONRY —�- � I PI1pJ� _ 12.MESQUITE TREE. S I BEDROOM JJ 5'-11 1/2 f � b t F.F.E. Ll o HUFF V _ La A A-T I L OLD �'I dIHIII KITCHEN .. a I — %DW ' I•MODEL1600ALEFTELEVATION © F FOYER _.- • 1/4"=1,0" - M i _ I >b s-o PORCH in I ♦ / - °D ( DOUBLE GARAGE ' - ■ -•_ /G t1i' CY 51 `} r, } rw:••3#•}i'... }# 3}<t- • • ,'�` I �iI110ra sue.t. •-, - r -i r#'. ># > )#< • • I 2G ETB CKi. I o : > • :; ,.. I KR EBS CARHUFF b ARCHITECTS,INC. n-I t3,-6" 2r-o 16� s-6 3149 E.PRINCE.ROAD 5t x3E 151�� fCildN, 3RRl0\A �F716-1227 b I Phone:(520)577-4560 I Pale(_420)577-4599 I NEW MODEL HOME FLOOR PLAN MODEL 1600A 1,621 GSF LIVING W/451 SF FOR:CUTSHAW-YEAGER,LLC 0 MODEL 1600A REAR ELEVATION ®GARAGE 1/4"=1•-0" 1/8"`1'-p RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 5 PARCEL N LOTS 1 THRU 28 • 11 Oil 111 KITCHEN p I ORO VALLEY DRB SUBMITTAL .. .. -- 0 . IEV•NM/ DALE LESCMPDDN 6Y 011 11.111. ` .. • II FOYER ,J. ❑ II 1111 DES DOUB( - LE GARAGE R4 'r b .. 1. � I 1 — t v b • •• • • II 5' 6• _ POOJECT b P03-6500 , •. - - - _ PORCH s` DATE ( • ■ • • DECEMBER 1 2003 8 • -- _ - - i SCALE NIAMEY +—+ — — • — --,-- �. — _. — F.F.E. _ �� �— � ,B'-m As Indicated PAC/MKC a MAYAN]1111E FLOOR PLAN MODEL 1600A W/OPTIONAL DEN 174 S.F.1795 GSF PLANS&ELEVATIONS ®MODEL 1600A RIGHT ELEVATION ®LMNG. MODEL 1600A 1/4"=1-0" 1/6"..1'-0" DRAMA]NAME A-3 ---------,--41 0 / () (3) I11) ........... (6) ..-\/,.t-, -''.-c-F • • — .. .�... Level 12€�;, :.s-: fi . �f�-. - � - _ - - , • r t_....-.:-...-.,... • A F.F.E. • —F.F.E. ` I T 0" � � 0" 44 a• (2) 04 —(1) (13) (10) (2) t e 8'-8' + 16-0' + 18-0" +3'-6 1n ®MODEL 1400B FRONT ELEVATION [ -•-0 I I I I MODEL 1400B W/OPTIONAL DEN FRONT ELEVATION 1/4"=1'-0" I `'s PORCH I. o, tv ELEVATION KEYNOTES I - MASTER BEDROOM o 1.STUCCO WALL SYSTEM. 2.INTEGRAL COLOR SLUMP • • • .I BLOCK MASONRY VENEER • 1•• �,.. ... .. • • 1 BASE W ITH TIMED MORTAR. I I •...._. 3.MASONRY COPING,COLOR �-I..• .:..:-..,. •: ,• .. .. :: . 4.WALL TCH SMOUNTED LIGHT ' GREAT ROOM TO•• • • I IAS` S` SCONCE. I- ... :c-'•:.:-.. .- Y WIND I D 1 5.MASONRY OW SILL OR DOOR t - .. ..?µ::%a?:;:•....;w-�•'-' ,n;'•^;s - - HEADER. to • • tr: . ,.�:-..:5•. ry.,t....atr::;. I MBAH 1 . - - ::r: t:r ,•: •�t;> . 4 •• .- - 6.FASCIA • :t...,. t..Y,.,...st.,�#=t�;-:':t,'E�:�%��<.. TRIM • • • • FASCIA I ri) 7.MISSION TILE ROOF. b -. `� - _:•l■■--• ■■.` •.I 8.PAINTED WOOD FRONT DOOR. I / ► I 1 1 i. - •;/'•••I. > �� - -. -1. ••I.,' - 9.PAINTED STEEL GARAGE DOOR. • D PANE AL NLM FRA o .',.•-. .•'; 0. UANDOW W/SIMULATED o I DW I W e 14'-3" 3'-0' 4'•6' 17-O 1/2' tv - •, "' DIVIDED ITTES WHERE SHOWN 1. 1 • • I b • ` - it.STUCCO ARCHITECTURAL POPOUT ' I - W/ I BEDROOM I b _-�� i DECORATIVE WROUGHT IRON TRIM I KjT R 1+7 . • .. • 12.SLUMP BLOCK MASONRY WINDOW '� � • - 111��� BATH.MASONRY SCREEN WALL WITH I4 A HALL • ,J, 13 STUCCO. b I 1 P411UP A • -�1 '� L. D 11 — F.F.E. I MI0 b I a— 0 MODEL 1400E LEFT ELEVATIONCeitterr I ,' PORCH I 1/4"=1'-0" I 1 I I I �c' - I t GARAGE �� N ram. �::::;;::;; �- '• ^'17 I 4'-0'• 9'-71/2" 1 1 Imo, �,`• i.., • °N rile •-• •.. • •• •• • • is 1::'t .... :>••.4.:.- .t:J.K 4r't.•.t•:.,-„v•-r;:i; \IU 1Jf• SETBACK ` • • • 7T0 156" 21'-o" 3'•6' ('� • - t t K�..E}3S l..ARHUFF TI b as • • • • • ARCH.�.TEG I'S,u�c. HI I I I - • 3149 E.PRINCE ROAD SUXI1/151 l I I l: I I ' : :• : b I I TUc Cr,Axuzo,A. 85716-12 • Fax:( )577-4599 x 520 5 I I • : NEW MODEL HOME ©FLOOR PLAN MODEL 1400B 1405 GSF LIVING W/455 SF GARAGE FOR:CUTSHAW-YEAGER,LLC RANCHO 0MODEL 1400E REAR ELEVATION NEIGHBORHOOD 5 POVISTAROCEL N 1/+•=r-0" ^ LOTS 1 THRU 28 v ORO VALLEY DRB SUBMITTAL I..••..::..••..:•..••.. ..:......... ..:...' i 1Eva1o11 oA>E �xmriall w W (D I A 0 • I .:: I:.•I 1..1.'I.'.i:.. ".. ..I..H..I:,, ri N ii H.�::N:....µ'::11::11:::)1,;11„I•„i,I, 1, H..1':.I .::":l•I::..::H:.tt.:•t::N.,N.,:i„J'.H IT :: 1.'I; ••,I•.,. ,I... V 'ti � I r a b I' b 1. b -v OPT 7 DEN OR GARAGE zu _ II III BR N - .. POOAECT W. ♦ 11'il I1 i1 . _ I P03 ccCC^^ �{1G1{!0 b 1 Am•IN -AIIIiii_____ OM DECEMBER 18,2003 F.F.E. • - — - - - — — - 0" 13'-0" 21'-0' 7,--.- As indicated PAC/MKC ORA.*WILE PLANS&ELEVATIONS FLOOR PLAN MODEL 1400B W/OPTIONAL DEN 225 S.F.1,630 GSF MODEL 1400B ®MODEL 1400B RIGHT ELEVATION ®LMNGM.WEBER w"=1-0 _ill (14) -• . • li :: \ 1 i1 ..ems,._ - .. *'* .• -.- ' •-41'‘'•' '• "-..- :--:•••••• ' I.,:':i...-i-'4i I "�s.... .- : -••1••••• • ••• •-•••..±-7---_ar-.•:•,-•-•-:.:. ....''•:•,.:,,i:f...,,,,A ,',i .•:,....:-.:•-#.k...-...:-...A1„,.rii1,...-if:„::: :,?..i.::,:-.iik,...<�5r • - u s, , % k.% \ < 6 b b i ,'1. r -.4,14.41:�` . r . '1r ' . (5) • .y • • • • 7 rr . . . -:::' — _ F.F.E. v • • 0• b I (13) (4 (4) (W (9) b 13'-6" 21'-0" 16'-0" y 6'-6' l 0 MODEL 16006 W/OPTIONAL DEN FRONT ELEVATION IT 0 MODEL 1600B FRONT ELEVATION 1/4".1,0" +I — — I• I II b I PORCH , 1,.. o I II BEDROOM MI • •I • l' ' ' ...••..,. ••..••.••..••,.•,.••..••,.•:..••..:•.••.••..• .. .. .. .. ,. iI Al \v/ ELEVATION KEYNOTESI' \ 1.STUCCO WALL SYSTEM. I Lam._.:.::••::••::••::••:••::••:i.::_i •::••:: :••:•:::••::••:::•::•• •::•:::•::•::• ::••::• ••......••..••.,••..••„••..••..••..:•...,.,.:•.....,.,.•..•.• .. 2 . t 3 • •, TINTED MORTAR. INTEGRAL COLOR SLUMP -. , •: ,. ,,, :: .. .. SLUMP BLOCK BASE. O BLOCK MASONRY COPINa COLOR BASE WITH M BATHL. MASONRYI MATCH .. '. 4.WALL M�IAJTEO LIGHT o .al Ili 1 . . ... . SCONCE. • •` '•• SC E. IN ILL.s WINDOW s MASONRY GREAT- G T .- - P BEAM AND b AIMED W 6. WOOD R - - - � .. FASC U1 TRIM. � ODAA 7 — •— .. N • .. - •- - .. _ 7.MISSION TILE ROOF. N I N _ r �— — 8. PAINTED WOOD FRONT DOOR. o BEDROOM 4 2 9.PAINTED STEEL GARAGE DOOR. �) 1 • —� •.. 10.DUAL PANE ALUM NUM FRAME �' • i I WIND W Wl SIMJLATED O _ t• 1 _ � • •• '• • ` ._ .. .. DIVIDED LITES WHERE SHOWN 1 r _.y ��'y `' •-'- "- • STUCCO ARCHITECTURAL POPO -t r • 11. Ui b � �� , s•':' "i': .'l'.�i':'• - W/ �, 1 �HALL I Q-` '(y�� . .. _ DECORATIVE WROUGHT IRON TRI S 1 1, 29908•: ..-.= •:•• _ _ MASONRY WIN •b • - .. .. .. � 12.SLUMP BLOCK DO � 1 P4ISLIP A.. , ` .: .•. .:'-• -.. _ -.. BEDROOM t 3 6-11 VT -- b l ca CAIL A. • - _.�_•, — — — — — — — — — 1 SCREEN WALL o 'r.� • 14. I. TREEIll ro SURROUND. �,I I ; ` STUCCO F.F.E. 3.MASONRY W I R � 1 Li KITH N a I \RIe.a 'S / I 0 MODEL 1600B LEFT ELEVATION © F FOYER ) DW J • I I 14 • I s o m to I • to /� t„ PORCH +-_ I::i:: ::..:::i si ii;i:;;i:::::::::......:::is ............:;;......;::;:::;.. //e a0 I DOUB;-E GARAGE E • I 1 i1 3 `\ trG o Ari I r;itrcilt;' -, .••••• -. •-:•-• -..,....-• ,..... .-- ,...-.--.-,• . •.- -4,,,,u,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,i,,,,,,:i;„ii,,,,„,„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,„,,„,„,,,,,,,j V-Vel) I - b.. 1 Sege {i, � • • I Al ` 20 SETBACK • • b 1 KREBS CARHUFF b • �3.-6" 21'-0" 18'- 6'-6" ARCHITE. TS:nic. . 3149 B.Px r tR Risen Suakin • TV�(rEy A JZO'RA 857164227 b I Phone:020).5774560 11 8 I I .fax:(520)577-4599 I,. .. .�,. • I1 ' _ F.F.0E^•N `— — I NEW MODEL HOME AI FLOOR CUTSHAW-YEAGER,LLC Ali MODEL 1600B REAR ELEVATION FLOOR PLAN MODEL 7600E Nor 1/4"=1`0" Ur 103"-1-0" RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 5 PARCEL N LOTS 1 THRU 28 11 i KID ORO VALLEY DRB SUBMITTAL I I • • • AEvgaw o�sE ...p.p. RV\\\,,, • .. ., .. .. .. { � F R OPT Cl :,: ir ji S. 1 1 -o' • • .. ���''�''�� ■■. - - �.• - DEN OR •• •l b DOUBLE GARAGE BR tF1 $` • • • PROJECT.. P03 650.1!:15 0 PORCH DECEMBER 18,2003 F.F.E. — — - — �—+ ^ 0" As Indicated PAC/MKC — T— —_ 16-0, PLANS&ELEVATIONS fi) MODEL 1600B RIGHT ELEVATION ®FLOOR PLAN MODEL 1600E W/OPTIONAL DEN 200 S.F. MODEL 1600B 1/4"=1'0" 1/8".1,0 DRA•.NUMBER A-5 AMA, . III II 4.)cl c co ro F`` Field Color'A' Model J; co ci,CO nra m,I L c 0 Fri ► a Y§ Zf4 '�! lki, J Field Color`B' Model Slump Block Trim Color'A' Model Roof Tile DEC 1 8 2003 Window Trim ,i.w..0.��. KREBS CARHUFF �_0-4,��:: . ry CutshawYeager, LLC. 1l'�vi A It C. H I I E C 1 S,INC. 1 I 3149 E. PRINCE ROAD, SUITE 151 TucsoN, ARIZONA 85716-1227 Material Selection PHONE: (520)577-4560 FAX: (520)577-4599 4116 Part Number: P5768-33 Manufacturer: Progress Lighting Quantity: 1 Lamp Options: (2)60w 810 Med C Total Wattage: 50 Provided by: LightingUniverse.corn>:• .• ' 4,‘ Product Description/Notes: Wall lantern with light honey art glass panels. Solid brass construction. Finish: Cobblestone Glass: Light Honey Art Lamping:Two x Medium B se Width/Diameter 13-3/4" Height: 11-3/4" Depth/Extension: 4-1/2"ProduactT-619°wpe:n1Soaxlid Brass Notes: H/CIR 7" Page 1 gp 41110 Part Number: P5203-20 Manufacturer Progress Lighting Quantity: 1 Lamp Options: (2)150w PAR38 Med Finish Options: Antique Bronze Total Wattage: 100 Provided by: LightingUniverse.corn Product Description/Notes: Two painted adjustable swivel floodlights.All aluminum. Lamping:Two x PAR 38-150w max Width/Diameter 6-1/4"Height 9"Product Type: Security Page 1 MINUTES OF THE ORO VALLEY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 10, 2004 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE REGULAR MEETING CALL TO ORDER: 6:02 p.m. PRESENT: Jim Vogelsberg, Chair Mary Caswell, Vice Chair Clark Reddin,Member Al Kunisch,Member Conny Culver, Member Jeff Weatherford,Member (6:03 p.m.) ALSO PRESENT: Bayer Vella, Senior Planner Mark Langlitz, Town Attorney Craig Civalier, Development Review Division Manager Robert Conant, Planner II Jerrilyn Billings, Planning Technician Kristina Curry, Secretary II ABSENT: Richard Feinberg, Member REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF JANUARY 13, 2004 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MINUTES MOTION: Vice Chair Caswell moved to approve the minutes, with Member Culver's amendment that on page 8, paragraph 5, Parks and Recreation and Police are also mentioned as having approved the location of the recreation area on the concept plan for OV 12-03-29. Member Culver seconded the motion. Motion carried 6-0. 2/10/2004 Development Review Board Minutes Page 2 CONSENT AGENDA 1. OV13-04-02, DELARCO DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION, REPRESENTING THE EVERETT'S, REQUESTS APPROVAL OF ARCHITECTURE FOR A TWO STORY CUSTOM HOME ON LOT 34 OF LA RESERVE PARCEL 0 & S; LOCATED WITHIN THE LA RESERVE PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT, PARCEL 220-080-900 2. OV13-03-49, ROBERT PAGE ARCHITECT, REPRESENTING STEVE AND RHONDA REIS, REQUEST ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL FOR A CUSTOM HOME ON LOT 191 STONE CANYON II RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 11, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF TORTOLITA MOUNTAIN DRIVE, PARCEL 219-060-720 MOTION: Member Culver pulled Consent Agenda Item 3 to the Regular Agenda. Member Weatherford moved to approve Consent Agenda Items 1 and 2. Member Reddin seconded the motion. Motion carried 6-0. REGULAR AGENDA 3. OV13-03-45, PHILLIP CARHUFF OF KREBS CARHUFF ARCHITECTS, REPRESENTING SCOTT STITELER OF STELLOR HOMES, REQUESTS APPROVAL OF FOUR ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND ELEVATIONS FOR MODELS HOMES FOR THE "AGUILA AT VISTOSO" SUBDIVISION (RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 5, PARCEL N) LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF NORTH RANCHO VISTOSO BLVD., APPROXIMATELY ONE- HALF MILE SOUTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF NORTH RANCHO VISTOSO BLVD. AND WEST MOORE ROAD, PARCEL 219-53-004Y. Member Culver added the condition that the impact of the garages will be minimized as outlined in the staff report: • Minimize the architectural details on or above the garage doors; • Paint the garage the same color as the house; and • Add a 4 foot high courtyard wall, with landscaping, to create a more visually- dominant house and entry feature, thereby diminishing the visual effect of the garage. MOTION: Member Culver moved to approve OV 13-03-45, Model Homes Number 1400A & B and 1600A & B for the "Aguila at Vistoso" subdivision, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit A, as well as the condition that the impact of the garages be minimized as outlined. Member Reddin seconded the motion. Motion carried 6-0. F:\Minutes\DRB\2004\2-10-04 DRB Minutes.doc Approved on April 13,2004 2 2/10/2004 Development Review Board Minutes Page 3 1. OV12-02-06A, EEC, REPRESENTING THE BEZTAK COMPANIES, REQUESTS APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR 4 COMMERCIAL/RESIDENTIAL LOTS, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LAMBERT LANE AND LA CANADA DRIVE, PARCEL 224-250-25C Bob Conant introduced the staff report into the record. Staff recommended that the DRB recommend Town Council approval of the Preliminary Plat for the Beztak Companies subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit A. Staff Conditions: 1. All conditions of the Grading Exception and the Development Plan approved by the Town Council shall be added as General Notes to the Preliminary and Final Plats where appropriate. 2. Locate on the Preliminary Plat the easement for Docket 7044 Page 813 from the Title Report, schedule B section 2. 3. All Title Reports shall conform to the Final Plat Boundary Data including Osco and Bank One. Member Culver asked the Town Attorney if this process would enable the applicant to make any changes to the layout or conditions of the approved development plan. Mark Langlitz responded that the applicant would not be able to make any changes. Chairman Vogelsberg inquired if the cross-access issues had been resolved, which was answered affirmatively. He observed that the applicant was not present for questioning. Chairman Vogelsberg opened the meeting to public comment for Agenda Item 1. Bill Adler, 10720 N. Eagle Eye Place in Oro Valley, asserted that the applicant can make changes to the development plan, but noted that if those changes are substantial, the development plan must be resubmitted. As the land was to be divided into legal parcels to sell, he questioned who the developer would then be. He addressed the zoning code requirement that states convenience uses may be no closer than 250 feet from residential uses, boundary line to boundary line; he noted that Lot 4 would not meet this requirement, as it was located less than 250 feet from both Osco and Bank One. He stressed that each lot must be compatible with the others, and that each should submit its own development plan. Chairman Vogelsberg closed the meeting to public comment for Agenda Item 1. Member Culver quoted Chapter 9 of the zoning code, which states "no convenience use shall be located closer to any R-4 or R-6 district than 250 feet, except within a PAD adopted before May 27, 1988". She asked staff what year the El Conquistador PAD was adopted. Bayer Vella answered that it was adopted in 1983, thus making it exempt from the previously mentioned requirement. In addition, Member Culver inquired if each parcel had enough parking, which was answered affirmatively. MOTION: Member Culver moved to recommend that Town Council approve OV12-02-06A, Beztak Companies Preliminary Plat Lots 1-4, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit A and the added condition that any change to the layout of the lots that impact the plat must be reviewed by the DRB and Town Council. Vice Chair Caswell seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-1 (Reddin opposed). F:\Minutes\DRB\2004\2-10-04 DRB Minutes.doc Approved on April 13,2004 3 • 2/10/2004 Development Review Board Minutes Page 4 2. OV13-04-01, SWAIM ASSOCIATES, REPRESENTING THE SISTERS OF THE IMMACULATE HEART OF MARY, REQUESTS ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL FOR A GYMNASIUM BUILDING; LOCATED AT 625 E. MAGEE ROAD APPROXIMATELY %2 MILE EAST FROM THE INTERSECTION OF ORACLE ROAD AND MAGEE ROAD, PARCEL 225130120 Bayer Vella introduced the staff report into the record. Staff recommended that the Development Review Board approve the proposed architecture for the Immaculate Heart Gymnasium, with the conditions listed in Exhibit C. Staff Conditions: 1. The courtyard area in front of the building must provide additional planters and/or benches. A minimum of two planters and two benches must be provided. 2. Additional landscaping must be incorporated on the west side of the building to include: a total of seven trees (to grow a minimum of 6' in height) and a total of eight shrubs (to grow a minimum of 5' in height). 3. The colors as presented in Exhibit "B" (exterior color, roof and trim colors) must be utilized as the building colors. Member Culver observed that the south side of the building may be as vulnerable to errant baseballs as the west side. She questioned whether additional landscaping should be required. As there would be no windows on the south side of the building, staff felt that the landscaping plan in place would be sufficient. Phil Swaim of Swaim Associates made a presentation to the Board. He reported that future development on the site, such as locker rooms, would be built along the western side of the proposed gym. Member Reddin inquired if there was a way to break up the long lines along the western elevation. Phil Swaim responded that it would be difficult, as the proposed gymnasium would be a pre-engineered structure. He observed that the massing would be broken up in the future with the addition of locker rooms and/or other structures. MOTION: Member Kunisch moved to approve OV13-04-01, architecture for the Immaculate Heart Gymnasium, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit "C". Vice Chair Caswell seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-1 (Reddin opposed). F:\Minutes\DRB\2004\2-10-04 DRB Minutes.doc Approved on April 13,2004 4 • 2/10/2004 Development Review Board Minutes Page 5 Chairman Vogelsberg informed the audience of a change in the order of the agenda. Item 5 would be reviewed next, followed by Item 4, and lastly by Item 3. Member Weatherford requested a short recess to confer with council. Recess: 6:3 7 p.m. Reconvene: 6:40 p.m. 5. OV12-03-5A, WLB GROUP REPRESENTING VISTOSO PARTNERS, REQUESTS APPROVAL OF A LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR INNOVATION PARK DRIVE, RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 3, INNOVATION PARK DRIVE INTERSECTS WITH TANGERINE ROAD AND RUNS NORTH TO RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD Bob Conant introduced the staff report into the record. Staff recommended that the DRB approve the Landscape Plan for Innovation Park Drive, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit A. Staff Conditions: 1. Trash facilities should be provided along the multi-use path. 2. The median should be contoured to facilitate water harvesting. 3. Small gathering areas with benches should be incorporated at approximately half mile intervals along the multi-use path. Chairman Vogelsberg inquired if the irrigation system could be retrofitted to use reclaimed water, which was answered affirmatively by Charles Holsey of the WLB Group. MOTION: Member Kunisch moved to approve OV12-03-5A, Innovation Park Drive Landscape Plans, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit A. Member Reddin seconded the motion. Motion carried 6-0. 4. OV12-03-30, WLB GROUP, REPRESENTING VISTOSO PARTNERS, REQUESTS APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR 174 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS, LOCATED IN RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 10 PARCELS S, U, AND V, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST AND NORTHWEST CORNERS OF MOORE ROAD AND LA CANADA DRIVE EXTENDED, PARCEL 219-190-02G Charles Holsey of the WLB Group requested a continuance of 60 days. MOTION: Member Weatherford moved to continue OV 12-03-30, Preliminary Plat for Parcels S, U and V Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 10 for a minimum of 60 days at the applicant's request. Member Culver seconded the motion. Motion carried 6-0. F:\Minutes\DRB\2004\2-10-04 DRB Minutes.doc Approved on April 13,2004 5 • 2/10/2004 Development Review Board Minutes Page 6 3. OV3-04-01, FLUORESCO LIGHTING AND SIGN COMPANY — REPRESENTING N C JR HOLDINGS, INC., (NEIL CAPIN — CAPIN PLAZA) REQUESTS APPROVAL OF A SIGN CRITERIA UNDER THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED, CHAPTER 12, SIGNS LOCATED AT 8175 N. ORACLE ROAD, PARCEL #'S 225-14-190C,225-14-190D AND 225-14-190E. Bayer Vella introduced the staff report into the record. He reported that the Sign Criteria would be reviewed using the Pima County code. In addition, he noted a pending violation on the Mobile canopy sign. Staff recommended approval of the Capin Plaza Sign Criteria. Member Culver inquired if legal authority to use the Pima County code was granted by Town Council as part of the annexation agreement. Bayer Vella responded that the sign code was not mentioned in the annexation agreement, but noted that the development had been reviewed and permitted by Pima County, not by Oro Valley. Member Culver voiced concern about using the Pima County code, and requested a recess so that the Town Attorney, Mark Langlitz, could produce a copy of the annexation agreement. Mark Langlitz informed the Board that he would not be able to obtain a copy in the time available. He further revealed that the developer was entitled to use the Pima County code if so told by staff; to renege on a previous agreement would expose the Town to liability. Member Kunisch asked if the Pima County sign code was not, in fact, stronger than the Oro Valley sign code. Jerrilyn Billings explained two differences between the codes: Pima County allows canopy signage, whereas Oro Valley does not; and Pima County allows for 3 tenant panels on monument signs, versus the 6 tenant panels allowed by Oro Valley. She noted that the Capin Plaza Sign Criteria would be in compliance with both Pima County and Oro Valley sign codes, with the exception of the Mobile canopy sign. Chairman Vogelsberg observed that if the Mobile canopy sign was indeed erected illegally, that it may come down. Ms. Billings replied that the Mobile canopy had been permitted through Pima County, but stated that it was in question whether or not the signage was included as part of that permit. She reported that, if the applicant brings forward proof of the signage permit, all three canopy signs may stay; if no permit is produced, and the Sign Criteria is approved using the Pima County code, one of the three canopy signs must be removed. Vice Chair Caswell questioned if the surrounding developments' signage meets Pima County code. Jerrilyn Billings answered that, as part of the annexation agreement, a sign survey had been conducted, and confirmed that the surrounding area's signage meets Pima County code and is permitted. In addition, Vice Chair Caswell recounted that at the November 12, 2003 DRB meeting, it was ruled that Discount Tire must use anodized bronze instead of red; she questioned if this would be compatible with the Sign Criteria now proposed. Andy Stash of Fluoresco Lighting and Sign Company made a presentation to the Board. He spoke of consistency within the Capin Plaza, as well as compatibility with the surrounding development. The color palette was presented,with red as the dominant color. Chairman Vogelsberg inquired if Fluoresco was involved with obtaining a sign permit for the Mobile canopy sign, which was answered negatively. F:\Minutes\DRB\2004\2-10-04 DRB Minutes.doc Approved on April 13,2004 6 2/10/2004 Development Review Board Minutes Page 7 Member Culver asked if the green and beige Capin logo was a trademark, and if documentation could be provided. Neil Capin of Capin Car Care responded affirmatively. Member Reddin objected to the dominant use of the color red. He noted that Discount Tire had replaced its use of red with anodized bronze, and asked the applicant if he would be willing to do the same. Mr. Capin questioned if the bronze could be illuminated. Mr. Stash answered that it could not be internally illuminated. Bayer Vella added that it could be halo lit, as with the typical copper patina signage throughout Oro Valley. Mr. Capin expressed concern over losing any benefits that he may have had through Pima County. Member Reddin asked the Town Attorney if the DRB would be allowed to replace the Pima County code with the Oro Valley code. Chairman Vogelsberg observed that, as Oro Valley code allows for more tenant panels on its monument signs, the trade could be a negotiation tool. Mark Langlitz replied that, though the Mobile canopy signage could not be included in the discussion, the DRB would be allowed to negotiate with the applicant, such as by offering more tenant panels for a change in the color palette. Neil Capin responded that more tenant panels would not benefit the center. Bayer Vella noted that the Mobile sign was a part of the Sign Criteria for the DRB to review. Jerrilyn Billings established the requirements for the Mobile canopy sign to remain, if the applicant did not produce a previously issued permit: • If reviewed using the Pima County code, one sign must be removed, and a permit issued at double fee for the two signs erected illegally. • If reviewed using the Oro Valley code, all three signs must be removed, and a variance must be obtained by the Board of Adjustment before reinstalling a canopy sign Member Kunisch felt that the property should be considered "grandfathered", as it was permitted through Pima County and only recently annexed into Oro Valley. He noted that the surrounding area's signage was predominately red, and that the proposed Sign Criteria would be compatible with the neighboring developments. Vice Chair Caswell voiced that a line must be drawn somewhere in order to improve newly annexed areas. The question was raised whether or not the development was within the Oracle Road Scenic Overlay District. The response was that it is not. Neil Capin asserted that, as part of the sale of the property,Discount Tire had agreed to comply with the Sign Criteria that the Capin Plaza developed. He voiced confusion as to the agreement between Discount Tire and the DRB to substitute red for anodized bronze. Jeff Schallenberger of Fluoresco Signs added that it was the first time he, too, had heard of this agreement. He noted that the Sign Criteria had been designed with consistency in mind, which included the red and black thought to be used by Discount Tire. Member Culver suggested that using the green and beige in the proposed color paletter, instead of the red,would be more aesthetically pleasing. F:\Minutes\DRB\2004\2-10-04 DRB Minutes.doc Approved on April 13,2004 7 2/10/2004 Development Review Board Minutes Page 8 Mr. Capin advised the Board that the Plaza would be open for business in just a matter of weeks. Though he stressed the importance of moving forward, he also voiced concern over adopting the Oro Valley sign code because of the fuel canopy. He made it known that he had a prior agreement with Mobile that included canopy signage. Member Kunisch reiterated that Pima County had given the Capin Plaza a permit to build. As other developments within the annexed area would not be required to retroactively change their signage, he felt that it would be unfair to require the Capin Plaza's Sign Criteria to be reviewed using a different standard. Member Culver observed that, as Discount Tire had changed its color palette to bronze, the applicant could no longer consider Discount Tire as the basis for its dominant use of red. Neil Capin noted that red was also used in the Capin logo, and remarked that Oro Valley staff had recommended the use of red for consistency within the center. Jerrilyn Billings stated that the Capin color palette had been reduced by staff from twelve colors to five. She added that, as there would only be five tenants, staff felt the use of red would not have a massive impact. Member Weatherford inquired if the approval of the Sign Criteria as proposed would change the DRB's agreement with Discount Tire to use anodized bronze. Bayer Vella clarified that the replacement of the red with anodized bronze on the Discount Tire building did not apply to its signage,but only to the red trim surrounding the signage and the window casings. Chairman Vogelsberg opened the meeting to public comment for Agenda Item 3. Bill Adler, 10720 N. Eagle Eye Place in Oro Valley, disagreed that compatibility should be strived for, as he considered the annexed area's signage to be unsightly. He urged the use of the Oro Valley sign code, as he felt it would upgrade the center's appearance, and recommended halo illumination for the signage. It was also his opinion that logos should be reviewed on an individual basis by the DRB. Chairman Vogelsberg closed the meeting to public comment for Agenda Item 3. Member Culver asked the applicant if he would be willing to replace the red with green and beige as the dominant colors and halo illuminate the signs, in exchange for an increase in tenant panels. Neil Capin responded that he did not need additional tenant panels, and voiced continued concern regarding the Mobile canopy signage. Member Reddin observed that it was at the Board's discretion whether or not to approve the colors of the Sign Criteria. It was at this point that a motion was made to approve the Sign Criteria, and then the Board entered into discussion regarding the colors proposed. Member Weatherford voiced mixed emotion over which code to implement, and also the use of red as the dominant color for the center. Member Culver again questioned the staffs legal authority to use the Pima County code, and disapproved of red as the dominant color. Member Kunisch stressed the importance of compatibility with the surrounding area. Vice Chair Caswell noted that, as the project is at the northern end of the annexed area, it should meet Oro Valley standards. To quote Chairman Vogelsberg verbatim, "It's the red on the structures, on the monument sign, that is where the major heartburn is coming from." F:\Minutes\DRB\2004\2-10-04 DRB Minutes.doc Approved on April 13,2004 8 2/10/2004 Development Review Board Minutes Page 9 The Town Attorney, Mark Langlitz, observed that the red in the color palette was the Board's primary deterrent to approving the Capin Plaza Sign Criteria. He advised that the DRB could approve the Sign Criteria with the condition that the color red is replaced with a color that is acceptable to the Board. Member Culver offered the friendly amendment to replace the red with the holly green and beige in the color palette, and halo illuminate the signage,which was accepted by Member Reddin. Member Kunisch asserted that the change in the color palette would make the red,white and blue of the Mobile canopy stand out even more. Member Culver inquired if the amended motion would pertain to the canopy, as well. Bayer Vella responded that, unless a Pima County permit for the canopy sign is brought forward, the Mobile canopy sign would be subject to all Sign Criteria requirements, including any change in the color palette. It was confirmed that the Mobile canopy itself would remain blue and white. Bayer Vella requested that the DRB state clearly on the motion which colors would apply to which signs. He also requested a notation if the Board was making an exception for signs with proof of a registered trademark. Chairman Vogelsberg and the Town Attorney confirmed that trademarked signage cannot be altered by the Development Review Board. MOTION: Member Reddin moved to approve OV3-04-01, Sign Criteria for the Capin Plaza. Member Weatherford seconded the motion. Member Culver amended the motion to replace the red on the tenant signs with the beige and holly green colors on the submitted color palette, and halo illuminate the signage. Motion carried 6-0. 6. EX-PARTE CONTACTS Agenda Item 6 was opened and closed without comment. STAFF REPORT Bayer Vella reported the following upcoming meetings: • Citizen Planning Institute continuing education class: Transportation Planning • Neighborhood meeting for the Whirlygig Property on La Canada • Special DRB meeting regarding bylaws, plus a sign presentation Mr. Vella also confirmed that the Planning & Zoning Commission had recommended denial of the Steam Pump Ranch rezoning request. The project will be brought before Town Council in March 2004. F:\Minutes\DRB\2004\2-10-04 DRB Minutes.doc Approved on April 13,2004 9 2/10/2004 Development Review Board Minutes Page 10 ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Member Weatherford moved to adjourn the February 10, 2004 Development Review Board Meeting Regular Session at 8:10 p.m. Member Kunisch seconded the motion. Motion carried 6-0. Respectfully submitted by, Recording Secretary, Kristina Curry F:\Minutes\DRB\2004\2-10-04 DRB Minutes.doc Approved on April 13,2004 10 JPLLEY ARC TOWN OF ORO VALLEY oQ.0 0 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 6) if, Planning and Zoning • Building Safety 11000 N.La Cana la Drive,Oro Valley,AZ 85737•(520)229-4800•Fax(520)742-1022 A Oro Valley Public Library A 1305 W.Naranja Drive,Oro Valley,AZ 85737• (520)229-5300•Fax(520)229-5319 Parks and Recreation "'UN D ED 680 W.Calle Concordia,Oro Valley,AZ 85737•(520)229-5050•Fax(520)797-2202 February 12, 2004 Phillip Carhuff Krebs Carhuff Architects 3149 E. Prince Road, Suite 151 Tucson,AZ 85716-1227 Fax (520) 577-4599 RE: OV 13-03-45, Architectural Approval of Model Homes 1400A and B and 1600A and B for Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 5, Parcel N, "Sunterra at Vistoso" subdivision, Parcels 1 through 23, Parcel No. 219-53-004Y. Dear Phillip: At their regularly-scheduled meeting of February 10, 2004, the Development Review Board (DRB) voted unanimously(6—0) to conditionally-approve the architectural plans for the above-referenced Model homes. The conditions approved by the Board are as follows: 1. Should the approved Final Plat for Lots 1 through 24 vary from the lot configuration shown on Sheet A-1 of this application, the subject model home plans for these lots may be brought back to the Development Review Board for reconsideration. 2. The Applicant shall install a capped spark arrester on the chimney top. All vents and chimneys must terminate per appliance manufacturer listings. The fixture is subject to review by the Planning&Zoning Administrator and the Town Building Official. 3. All flat-roofed segments of the structure must have roof coatings painted to match the exterior facades using a non-reflective paint material. 4. All roof-mounted equipment must be concealed from view from all sides of the building pad. .. 5. The garage doors shall be painted the same color as the houses. 6. The Model Homes shall include the front entry courtyard as shown on plans for Model 1400A and B and 1600A and B as a way to mitigate the visual impact of the front-facing garage. t www.townoforoval ley.com February 12, 2004 Phillip Carhuff OV13-03-45 Page 2 of 2 Conditions 5 and 6 are reflected on the January 9, 2004 plan revisions contained in our OV 13-03-45 file. Please ensure that those conditions as well as conditions 2 through 4 are reflected in the plans that you submit for your building permit. You may want to attach this letter to the building permit application for your model homes. If you have any questions about this matter, please feel free to call me at 229-4814 or email me at smontana@orovalley.net. Sincerely, — c2,,,,c,j—evliel---9.--___ Susana Montana, Planner II C: Shirley Gay, Dee Widero Mr. Scott Stiteler, Stellor Homes,Fax: 520-575-9106 David Lord, Sonterra Properties, Fax: 520-622-8636 TRANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT TIME : 07/20/2004 15: 07 NAME : FAX . TEL . DATE,TIME 07/20 15: 06 FAX NO. /NAME 5774599 DURATION 00: 01:18 PAGE(S) 02 RESULT OK CHECK READABILITY OF TRANSMITTED PAGE(S) 01 MODE STANDARD TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Phone: (520) 229-4800 Community Development Fax: (520) 742-1022 11000 N. LaCanada Dr. Oro Valley, AZ 85737 To:"Pr i z/ 6,fieiVgf /4 _. -- Fax:_ 5 7?- L15-19 phone: - -- From; -)°A/4T iv Lev, - - --- Pages Including Cover: bate: - 7-cy -. Regarding: lit-RE _ IS 4Lp-few TO C4f(F1/m ids- 6 1A s' Thar gejcev iit t To ✓ Iv' I p yell/ #A. .__ /fry a v rla4, rzeatre- ter FROM : KREBS CARHUFF ARCH. PHONE NO. : 5205774560 Jul. 19 2004 11:58AM P2 " , KREBS CARHUFF Y � Plin ir, A_ CARH.HUFF .A.1..A. ARCHITECTS,INc. DIANE KREBS CARRUF ,A_1.A. July 19, 2004 Jonathan Lew Zoning Division Community Development Department Town of Oro Valley 11000 N. La Canada Ave. Oro Valley, AZ 85737 RE: 1.s` review comments for the Rancho Vistoso Parcel 5 Neighborhood N Model Homes, activity numbers M0400044,M0400045, M0400046,M0400047. Page 1 of 1 Via fax: 742-1022 Dear Jonathan: Per your comments dated 7/14/04 please review the following responses here listed in order. 1 and 2: We respectfully request a change of model numbers according to the chart below. We dropped the 1400A design due to market concerns. The design of 1400E was retained with three proposed variations in length and width only. As for 1600 A we want to change that to 1705 as the base model 1600B changes to 1705 with den option selected. The change in numbers is for a market concern that the house name reflects the actual square footage area of living space. Chart of changed model numbers Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 5 Parcel N The new project name is:Sunterra at Vistoso. Old Model Number New Model Number New Model Number New Model Number 1400A Cancelled Cancelled �... Cancelled 1400E 1483 1627 1773 1600A 1705 160GB 1705 with den option _ 3. The houses submitted for consideration are the same design except we dropped the masonry trim versions and substituted a stepped parapet pop-out for the battered design. All other design features to mitigate the garage, such as courtyard walls and landscaping, remain intact. Please call or fax if you require additional information. Very truly yours, Philip A. Carhuf AIA Cc: David Cutshaw 3149 E_ Pli.uNcE Ron SUITE 151 TUCSON, ARIZONA 85716-1227 (520)577-4560 FAx(520)577-4599 JP0--EY qR/� TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 0 �2 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT o -9 Planning and Zoning • Building Safety 11000 N.La Canada Drive,Oro Valley,AZ 85737•(520)229-4800•Fax(520)742-1022 Oro Valley Public Library 41, 1305 W.Naranja Drive,Oro Valley,AZ 85737• (520)229-5300•Fax(520)229-5319 p Parks and Recreation SUN DED 1g 680 W.Calle Concordia,Oro Valley,AZ 85737•(520)229-5050•Fax(520)797-2202 July 20, 2004 Philip Carhuff, AIA Krebs Carhuff Architects 3149 E. Prince Road Suite 151 Tucson, AZ 85716 RE: OV 13-03-45, Revised Model Homes for Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 5, Parcel N—"Sunterra at Vistoso", Parcel Number 219-53-004Y. Dear: Mr. Carhuff Staff has reviewed the July 19, 2004 submittal of revised Model Homes for the above- referenced subdivision. The revised models reflect a change in the floor plan and elevation from the models that were approved by the Town's Development Review Board on February 10, 2004 in the following manner: 1. Courtyard: Living space in the front elevation has been extended approximately 7 feet toward the street by moving the courtyard wall past the garage façade toward the street. Landscaping will be continued on the street side of the courtyard wall. 2. Numbers: As specified in your letter dated July 19, 2004, the new models are renumbered. 3. Masonry trim: The masonry trim versions have been replaced with a stepped parapet pop-out for the battered design. The revised treatments of the OV 13-03-45 Architecture are deemed minor changes which improve the design of the front elevation and diminish the visual prominence of the garage doors. Pursuant to Section 3-301.C. of the Oro Valley Zoning Code, Revised,we approve the revised Model Numbers 1483, 1627, 1773, and 1705. If you have any questions about this matter, please feel free to call me at 229-4853 or email me at jlew@orovalley.net. Sincerely, Xler— Jonathan Lew Cc: File www.townoforovalley.com 866-6COO ``! Ids :s t�. 4 ' M 9 I I I I I I I L -II w. „Mr 1 �- ' .,..yA NO' DO' 00 ;'51.83 49.00 52.32 ' 47,, _ r 15 .: w 3.25 3.25' I I LIGHT! I ` _>> WITH THE T.O.U. LIGHTING ORDINA\ =: ?; :' Lot 14 A`- Lot 12 r FPE = 52.6 fPE = 51.8 , 2 Lot 13 1-4ERF SHALL BE NO OPERA T ICiiv.iMAINTENAP CE OR 0.112 Acres +�iCf; WrtSET � �� T SHALL�� R 4900 S f. SUNRISEAIROF ANGHEADY IN NQEQUIPMENT GF,SES EARLIERBET THANEENSU 6:�AMAND MECHANICAL EQUIP (T;WN CODE SECTION.10-1.4 5 SCREENED BYA MINIMUM 4'.v\ASONP WALL(ZONING CODE 13-106-6) I i 9 J r — — I l r v2 \ Water Service s , 21$771-WW W='`0 00' P.U.E. -17- 1,37*-41:41,014" T x Aga. � 51.1350.83 SDI 00X00 ` Zone: Q M0LloobA� S� fM.B.1-, 3u Seacliff Place TOWN OF ORO VALLEY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW bA �' DEPARTMENT APPROVED BY DAT .e� PLANNING&ZONING % i Q 1 F k(9 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING SAFETY 1- ;(a�_1 j •1 : ; Z .ji . APPROVAL OF I LAMS SHAL t L NOT CONST UE 0 B_A PERMIT FOR,OR AN APPROVAL OF, VIOLATION OF ANY OF K THE PROVISION OF ORO VALLEY CODES AND ORDINANCES Scale:1"=20' SPEC{AL CONDITIONS: MaX grade: �� , ___ __ Act.grade: / Rancho Vistoso N5 S�0 e I Cutshaw Yeager L.L.C. Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 5 Lots 1 through 27 _... 4rraw tare'Survey,rvey, rna. LOT No.: 13 ADDRESS: 12767 1 . GRADING TYPE:A Seacliff Place 3121E&DAME I P,a {s2o 1-2155 F.G.: 524 v PLAN: 1880 11/CSOtt AZ 85716 FAIT520881 z466 F.F.E.: 53.1 -v ELEVATION: LAND SURVEYING CONSTRUCTION STAKING goc,-,0 ,-7 ,.., ,,,,, . , , 7„.,,, , •N '�: '' I MOO' I I SW Gas Easement J 5 t I NO' 00' 001- J ' 52.94 L 11 51.69 T ,,; I I C L - THERE Sn LL BE NO OPERATION.MAINTENANCE OR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT 5-AELLF5 REPAIR OF HEAVY EQUIPMENT BETWEEN SUNSET AND SCREENED 3Y A M1 iN UM 4'MASON ZY SUNRISE AID IN NO CASES EARLIER THAN 6:00 Zvi 1 (TOWN COI E SECTION.10.1 45) WALL(7ONI\G COPE 13-106-6) 1 0 ui Lot 16 po 1\ FPE = 53.1 (oo 77 ;o I r 1 D.00' I o ALL OUTDOOR LIGHTING SHALL COMPLY � ' f fio Lot 17 01 Nill-i TI-E TO.y, LIGHTING ORDINANCES @ 0.119 5177 Acres —— -I-� • • • I I � coo' Water Service Ice,, j .A.E. ,,,,,, x 4,,,,,„rit ; p 1 P.U.E. 4:_20:Q F" � F��� � ���n. /� /�� amen . ,, i .1ptit:, 5�g4450�DO 'A© � 51.94 "�.., foo - ° a e n 28.11 eC .-,y 1 Seacliff Place one: P 1"1 I ` du� r<' :: S F R - ti\ot-c000t-t7 M.B.H. 30) ..,,,, 'fa;N OF ORO VALL.I-Y DEVELOPMENT SERVICES w Se h ckS, Y � SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW 411 DEPARTMENT APPROVED BY DAT F 1 PUBLIC V‘ZRKS ltir -> Rm. itAxtQatzikr. 7 'j-1;; :. • Bt;4LDING;'Ar rrY ► 1,41 It/lice .c2 5-1 APPROVAL OF PLANS SHAd NOT DE..► ST*LIED TO B A Scale:1" =20' PERMIT FOR.OR AN APPROVAL.OF,A1'(1' •T1ON OF ANY OF THE P GVISIO . O ORO VALLEY CODE AND ORDINANCES 9,6mv: SPECIAL am5nT.F SONS: VAC::C:: Rancho Vistoso N5 ' Cutshaw Yeager L.L.C. Rancho Vistoso - Neighborhood Lots 1 through 27 -4rrrw Land Survey,. , 'nc, LOT No.: 17 ADDRESS: 12791 —quik GRADING TYPE: ALT j Seacliff Place 3121 E KIDNDALE REt Pi/ANE(520)881-2155 F.G.: 53.0 .J PLAN: 1880 TUCSOli AZ 85716 F0(520881-2466 F.F.E.: 517 NI ELEVATION: LAND SURVEYING CONSTRUCTION STAKING 66 colco /5- :''; 3 I ' k- f .. I I 4 tv ti I L 1— I I N0' 00' OO'E6 ITT 4 • 50.28� 5111 w 51.78`; I r 3.25' MECHANICAL EQUIPMENTSH L 3E SCREENED 3YA MI\IMUM 4'M'SONRY ° e.,....,d,I I WALL(ZO\I\G CODE 13-106-6 \-- Lot 13 FPE = 52.4 0 0 4 C. Lot 12 ALL OUTDOOR LIGHTING SHALL COMPL` z 0.113 Acres -1 a) 4912 s.f. � WITJ THE TON. LIGHT!\G ORI'NANCE ._ o L" ci N Fliffil a) �50.20 spriwi vi r ,n \— \ 10.00' , f•' u ,: [ P.U.E. .. , ' ," . Y ITI- IMMO .,*,,,.., ‘ A,'.44 1.00' ' o 50 es ��50',e101000,'E •50.83 fix., 4 NA.E. 28.11 ° sv • .;. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ZCne, Kb THERE SHAD BE NO OPERATIC) , NANC OR SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW DEPARTMENT APPROVED BY DATE REPAIR OF HEAVY EQUIPMENT SET" SUNS T AND PLANNING .ZONING �� ,, 'H' 3O' Seacliff Place SUNRISE AND IN NO CASES EARLIER THAN 6:00'M i PUBLIC'WORKS S aCkS: (TOWN CODE SECTION:10-14.5) BUILDING SAFETY• APPROVAL OF ,S SHALL NOT BE"aDNST,UED o BE A lc D„. PERMIT FOR,OR AN APPROVAL..OF, VIOLATION OF ANY OF Z )-1 ;, THE PROVISIOtp OF O;iO VALLEY CODES AND ORDINANCES S MA.011. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: , 5' Scale:1" =20' Max gra4e: Ad.gradie: Rancho Vistoso N5 7 �� ne Cutshaw Yeager L.L.C. Rancho Vistoso - Neighborhood S Lots 1 through 27 r .. -=irrow Land Survey, Inc, LOT No.: 12 ADDRESS: 12761 �,‘ GRADING TYPE: ALT / Seocliff Place J121 E AZEINA4I.E RQ PMONE(520)881 2155 F.G.: 51.8 PLAN: 1880 TUCSON,AZ 85716 FAx(520)881 2466 F.F.E.: 52.5 vI ELEVATION: LAND SURVEYING CONSTRUCTION STAKING