Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOV130311 VistosO Gateway A Gated Residential Community Tentative Development Plan Oro Valley, Arizona OV9-00-04 January 2001 Revised and Resubmitted April, 2001 prepared for: Tangerine Limited Partnership prepared by: Laidlaw Consulting, LLC Michael L. Ives & Associates, Inc. I .r��-y,l z ti ----4 „.- 4 ,,,,,_ ,N. - i Est r. R• �' -€-'1, .,v,h , .. C"--t,• • u..,.l1.� vow,_ • f•�s.- ,-' G t'i yy - ''7 �,. ' d'' S _ .K i•e'i� , .v.�1 s` !�- :ter y.- .�,/ T i �.... • _;}' a:8+ j S`=` iiy ♦.•K y-Y - - 1'; k ' .` 2. _ .�W - . It +� c .A.. 40,� •++ < N ('E :,\ j 2 � J.81 y�,ram. �Y + �� '' w3h ...a' • ia J • ...V_M " •Y^4 'Yr1�! {„ .+� .:'qI "S� i�r ( `.1i _.y. 1 YT -W _ ..r. ie�. 4 f l, w?T ` J 1" 7 r I 1, 4 .i- • - - i. f t, }( 1 r t 7, '4�4 a 3'' It .i y `_, 'f „i-:: } � .�'1a'4A: q' , j'' 'ae..'6''Irar' ..j.. * ' ', '..4..< --., - . -:----- '- - - -,',...vi,t - . • - :, t is _ „ 'X'-. .„.44.4, ;; �u' /,. �. .f y i.r 1,' _ 4 s .r._� . a a ` ! z ,t I . Part 2 — LAND USE PROPOSAL A. PROJECT OVERVIEW Vistoso Gateway is a planned residential gated community of 50 single- family custom home sites on 53.48 gross acres. To achieve this, the density of the development has been reduced to 0.93 residential units per acre from the potential maximum of 2.0 residential units per acre as designated on the amended Oro Valley General Plan. This makes possible the preservation of natural washes with their typical denser vegetation. No "mass grading" is proposed. Except for the necessary improvements in the streets, building "envelopes" for construction of the residential homes and minor fills in some flood fringe areas, the site will remain in its natural state. Prior to home construction, each lot will be surveyed and the building will be positioned so as to maximize the preservation of trees and saguaros. The end result will be a neighborhood with a traditional, "semi-rural," soft look. The community will have a homeowners' association, CC&R's and design guidelines for architectural review, as required by the Town Code. The association will periodically inspect natural open space areas to guard against encroachment. Reflection Ridge CC&R's and design guidelines will be used as a model. Access to the Vistoso Gateway development will be from the existing Reflection Ridge Drive which was approved by the Town of Oro Valley as part of the Reflection Ridge subdivision adjacent to the site to the east. The centerline of Reflection Ridge Drive, measured along the Tangerine Road centerline, is approximately 1,440 feet east of the centerline of La Canada Drive which complies with the 600 foot minimum distance for an intersecting arterial roadway per the Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay Plan and District. A temporary emergency access lane (right-in / right-out only) will be required on the easterly side of C.A. "C" until emergency access to the development can be provided at the northern extremity of the development when the La Canada Drive (extended) roadway is built. This temporary emergency access lane is a minimum 600 feet from the centerline of La Canada Drive to the west. Bollards will be placed along this temporary emergency access lane at the north and south sides to assure that this lane will not be used unless for an emergency as defined by the Town of Oro Valley. Restoration of this temporary emergency access will be made by the developer/ builder once the permanent emergency access lane is installed at the northern portion of the site to La Canada Drive (extended). -1- B. TENTATIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN (overlay) The Tentative Development Plan for Vistoso Gateway, in accordance with Section 3-104B of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised, is shown as Figure 2-B.1. The Tentative Development Plan Overlay (showing only the development area) is included in this report in the manila envelope at the end of the report and the McHarg Composite Map, Figure 1-M.1/5, is also included for reference. C. EXISTING LAND USES 1. The proposed zoning of the Vistoso Gateway development is R1-36 on 53.5 acres. The remaining 15.0 vacant acres to the west of the rezoning area are under the same ownership but not subject to rezoning at this time. The properties north, east and south of the Vistoso Gateway development are located within the town limits of the Town of Oro Valley. The property to the north of the site is currently vacant and zoned R1-144. A plan amendment to 1.3 — 2.0 RAC is currently in process with the Town. The property immediately to the east of the site, Reflection Ridge, is zoned R1-36 on the western half and R1- 20 on the eastern half. The Reflection Ridge development is currently under construction with building of several upscale homes. The properties south of the site, across the future 300' right-of-way of Tangerine Road, are zoned C-1 (United States Post Office), R-6 (Diamond Key at Copper Creek and R-4 (Copper Creek II). The post office site was rezoned from R1-144 to C-1 in 1998. The Vistoso Gateway proposed zoning boundaries are shown on Figure 2-C.1. 2. The proposed land use for Vistoso Gateway is compatible with on- and off-site land uses. The relationship between Vistoso Gateway and adjacent Reflection Ridge is discussed below. Vistoso Gateway is "buffered" from the more intense / dense development south of Tangerine Road by providing a 50' wide open space easement along the north right-of-way of Tangerine Road with ancillary fencing and landscape buffering. The contiguous properties to the west of Vistoso Gateway will provide a buffer from the La Canada Road extension. The principal motifs of the plan are: • Provide custom housing of high quality and innovative design to satisfy the market demand in the area. -2- • Maximize the size of lots with two main objectives in mind: To Y provide large and areas and setbacks from adjacent 9 dwellings in Reflection Ridge. Vistoso Gateway TDP shows a total of 11 lots adjoining 12 lots in Reflection Ridge development; and, To allow individual siting of homes along curvilinear/ cul-de- sac streets so as to create an interesting streetscape and, most critically to the developer/ builder, to preserve good quality trees and saguaros on individual lots and within the areas designated as reserved open space. i • to the greatest extent feasible, preserve natural areas associated with local washes. During construction, a separate access point to Tangerine Road, for t construction-related vehicles and equipment only, will be designated I ' to prevent such traffic on Reflection Ridge Drive. . Design Guidelines— Lot widths vary significantly from 120 feet up to 250 feet which, combined with varying setbacks and sideyards, and variations in building design and materials, should result in a very attractive, non-tract appearance. Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) will stipulate that garages constitute no more than 50 percent of total building frontage, garage projections shall be no more than five (5) feet in front of the house, and the same elevation and floor plan shall not be repeated without at least a three lot separation. With the cooperation of the Town of Oro Valley, ` reduction of side yards might be achieved in individual instances to accommodate a residence's specific siting requirements and to preserve native vegetation. In the same manner, front yard reduction might be achieved from time to time to achieve non- uniformity in the streetscape. Each lot will contain at least 12,000 square feet subject to disturbance either by grading, trenching, surfacing or landscaping, including front and side yard setback areas. The stormwater detention basins at the south end of the 1 development will be blended into the landscape via transplantation 1 of trees and hydroseeding of native grasses and shrubs. All roof I mounted mechanical equipment will be architecturally screened from view and the color of roofing materials will correspond to the natural land and vegetation colors of the site. -3- i • i a R1 144 /� Z 7V 2 Q Fidelity National Title 'osenmar 7 ��rs- - 1Ir 1r; i .�,1�i1yj1j1.1.111, / �11/111•• ► • 11111•�� Z ' ! , . . ,/, •••1�1/1.1.1•�11.11 , 1111 � ►•111111111••� s Ka (vacant) ;m_.,' , 1.1.1.1•••••••1•�. y y� � -►•�111/1111••• F 7 �1111•11•••1•1•11 � 111♦ 111111� 1 Kay (vacant) �11V111.11.1.1••, i / ( . 411••1.1 •1 . �Ka Alderson ( ►�►11111•t7 V- 1 W y (vacant) RI-444t11 . ,,�/,1..11.1111 Pima ounty 1♦111/11111.1�� ir *"�' 1"1'�'�'� • RI-36♦111 Oro alley b maw ♦1v v. 1.1� �S 4cs?44i51t3f4 : 411111 ' Ai )_ 11�11Miller F# 1.1.11, , Ri• •••1•�, gm . R1- .44 14411111�/••••1•j j j•1111�A LI ....A..:•1p11111.1•••••1j�111 •A• 1111 lir . ' 1le.b. ♦11t�•1111/111� (unde 11 • 1111 Miller(vacant) 11111-�♦••1•��1 ji•1•11•1•1•1��� .1111.1.1.1.1•••4 'i111* eWMWNM•1 ;b Tangerine Road '' tts Post Office � �� Seloto(vacant) QO C—I .R1-144 �r� >\ \ Unsub(vacant) ct Pt111:1:1;14,417 1 400' Ca moigiiiitt, tt , VI r„,,,, \,-.,.. :- illI - ., Figure 2-C. 1 Proposed Zoning f 8 L Jeff Saffer Snell & Wilmer 1 South Church Ave, Suite 1500 Tucson, AZ 85701 February 13, 2003 RE: ACTIONS TAKEN DURING THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY'S PLANNING DEPARTMENT REVIEW OF THE VISTOSO GATEWAY SUBDIVISION Dear Mr. Saffer, Please accept this correspondence as a summary of the actions taken during the Town of Oro Valley's Planning Department review of the Vistoso Gateway subdivision project. This letter will not include every detail of the approved documents, but rather will serve as a reference for locating the information you may need. • On June 20, 2001, the Town Council approved Ordinance No. (0) 01-19 which rezoned the property known as Vistoso Gateway (Parcel#'s 291510040, 291510050, and 291510060) from R1-144 to R1-36. The ordinance was passed with the specific understanding that 15 acres of land west of the wash shall be donated to the Town for the sole purpose of right-of-way for the La Canada Drive extension and that Reflection Ridge Drive shall be modified as necessary to provide separate southbound right and left turn lanes at its intersection with Tangerine Road. Please use the Town of Oro Valley case number OV9-00- 04 when referencing this item. • On May 15, 2002, the Town Council approved the Preliminary Plat (0V12-02-01)which included 42 General Notes and conditions of approval for resubmitting the Final Plat. • On January 15, 2003, the Town Council approved the Final Plat (OV 12-02-01)which included 42 General Notes and conditions of approval. One condition states that before the plat is recorded any adjustments in the slope easements for lot 17, 18 due to off-site improvements for Reflection Ridge Drive shall be shown on the plat. • The Improvement Plans for both on-site and off-site improvements have been approved by the Town Engineer. No changes to the Final Plat were necessary. The applicant needs to resubmit the Final Plat for recordation with the County. I hope this brief summary provides the information to satisfy your inquiry. If you need further details please contact me at (520) 229-4820 or tkeiran@orovalley.net. Sincerely, Thomas J. Keiran Planner I F:\OV\OV12\2002\0V12-02-01\VG_action_summary.doc 12/1 f/2002 11:01 520/411 N'''' nL/b� o O *Ali#,OEP O Planning &Zoning Division 11000 N. La Canada Drive,Oro Valley AZ 85737 Phone: (520)229.4800 Fax: (520)742-1022 www.townoforovalley.com APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROJECT ARCHITECTURE DATE: 3-i 4- D3 OV CASE NO.: (office use only) PROJECT NAME: \/tS dso w `' SUBDIVISION A~ wA,' LOT#. i Med 54 t0 nktiV Co t L O= # G'MU t�4 e° y- � t 'R e .aJ " LOCATION!ADDRESS: IV i� � 0004 ZONING -3 O PARCEL NUMBER: 2tc%-5t-06V3,Ot040 r OOSOJ LOT SIZE 3t0,'r'l11405 "- MODEL NAMES OR NUMBERS_ 32.0—1 APPLICANT: At" " TLLAl"- t4 ✓n : ADDRESS: S1 rr . ., S V e 249 PHONE NO.: "17-314200 FAX NO.: 617 Los4 PROPERTY OWNER: -�'r o{ '�" V ':t`n°I .- _ 1 ADDRESS: zsi-s E. • PHONE NO.: S I,7_ ( 0O FAX NO: t› . (03 4 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD H 1NG D•-*r tok SIGNATURE: 0:er, DATE: 3/'4/03 Submittal Requirements: $150.00 Fee _. -C neck :One copy of 24x36 eWvations and floor plan 114 or 118 scale :One copy of 24x36 site plan 40 scale (Custom Lots Only) :Typical lot lay out for subdivision on 1 13k r', i;j t-i.4 Models--Lot fit analysis for subdivisions a-A:06,-Ai' -° 1;1+r44,t•� '""T 4 R tr Fifteen copies of the following: Dimensioned Elevations of all four sides of all buildings(11"x 17"format) oir, Commercial projects require color drawings or photographs of elevations(81/2"x 11"format) List square footage of buildings Pr' Site Site Plan(11"x 1 T'format)-PLC;- D 1r Color chips of body,trim and roof tiles(81/2"by 11"format) 7(' ,^z1 Applications will not be accepted without all required materials. SUBMITTALS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AT LEAST 18 CALENDAR DAYS IN ADVANCE OF THE DESIRED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD HEARING DATE. F:1Admin PZ%FORMS\Shannan Project Subdivision Development HandouttDRBPROJARCHAPP-doc AF Sterling Home Builders LTD. Project: Vistoso Gateway Municipality: Oro Valley Subject: Lot Fit Analysis for Development Review Board X=Lot accepts house with no set back issues ***=Potential setback issue Lot Number: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 Plan: 3207 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X *** X in COMM :IAL DEVELOPMENT CONTAC �j719 Keyword• : To 0 172 - in -- H From Cont c / Business/Landowner Represented � C . Name Name Business : Business .• Address : Address . City/State/Zip City/State/Zip • Phone : ( ) Phone : ( ) Fax : ( ) Fax : ( ) Mobile : ( ) Mobile : ( ) E-Mail : Website .• Development Type : ED Staff Contacted : Yes No Start Date : Checklist Provided : Yes No Probable Location : Zoning : Permitted Use .• Comments . ' . a-01 4 te A wee7 - ye/I.( d/1/ W--AT ii°r. . ('‘)1*47 c4772--"t 'l'' 6)71 41,-r Ovrixei Atfr.- 4 D ' fri,q) It.- -oe, Ate. ' (E., v er \ fir wici vi....1 . al-444-71 ) ° , 5 I v 1-6///, &ite-77&pf 'col 4,0)7 . )1,1 .ere,e, erz3 tag€/9 "(/6 " 44: -fj. Ge(fq si, ,,L 1,3- i•Phe i-i-4 . 7(3 ka,e)2--ei ? F:\NJakups\Miscellaneous\F-CommercialDevelopmentContacts COMMAJl\CIAL DEVELOPMENT CONTAC g Keyword : yi)Dateflip4ti Y J /7;2 ./ i To From Contact Business/Landowner Represented Name : Name - Business : Business Address : Address City/State/Zip City/State/Zip Phone : ( ) Phone : ( ) Fax : ( ) Fax : ( ) Mobile : ( ) Mobile : ( ) E-Mail . Website . Development Type : ED Staff Contacted : Yes No Start Date : Checklist Provided : Yes No Probable Location : Zoning : Permitted Use : Comments : m 1 i_0) a oi o(7- 0._ F.. 7 7,,,,v,,,,,,, ,, L.,.,( --- a,a71.,e , ,... 6tyli. „64,0frol 1,9,i,d.,e4r_c) vizew ,.34,Le r qtY1-966(wcz,e - 1- _. ��CC :---(ii ,}--„, 0 • yr A 4 , ,, . -4,-0 ro P , , Y( u.,)-vtd < w/1.4& eredz/ F:\NJakups\Miscellaneou s\F-CommercialDeveiopmentContacts i COMMtKCIAL DEVELOPMENT CONTAC i 3 Date : If/F / Keyword : To : From : Contact Business/Landowner Represented Name : et,b Name : Business - CjiW kL42Business . Wpri;(,- Address Address : City/State/Zip City/State/Zip • Phone : 0-11t) qI . C.70Phone : ( ) 5" Fax f4 Fax Mobile : ( ) Mobile : ( ) E-Mail . Website . Development Type C cr---f- - a''<7 il Cfr;e(7 el tii taff Contacted : Yes No Or Start Date . Checklist Provided : Yes No 0Probable Location : 2` 4727/ _fat Zoning, • ISICtiki- Pern iite e 1//40' , Comments ilie/•°6(9 ilnr°41-661 ik' - -it7P - /1-1/( 6-Ce 40/- 217Wit- r/-4/ dli,v11 ' ////e& awe /),Litn ii-e. 1-- -,,I /2-- -/e7Y F:WJakups\Miscel laneou s\F-CommercialDevelopmentContacts APR-16-2003 12:07 FROM- T-384 P.0O1/005 F-736 3573 E. Sunrise Suite 209 Tucson, Arizona 85718 (520) 577-3600 Fax 577-0634 A.F. STERLING FAX TRANSMITTAL SMITTAL SHEET 3573 East Sunrise Drive, Suite 209 Tucson, Arizona 85718 Telephone: (520) 577-3600 Fax: (520) 577-0634 To: ,r ; �-���;� ��s 024+3 A Company: O '41u.€`1 From: F. t , Date: -as-C) Fax No : —74 i r 16 2- Number of Pages (inci .cover) : MESSAGE : -DcbS. S t mac- 3 '7 U t \1,44 \ . %Le "% ..-.� c r • Notice of Confidentiality: This facsimile may contain information that is privileged and confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. This transmission is intended solely for the individual or entity designated above. If you are not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you should understand that any distribution, copying or use of the information contained in this facsimile by anyone other than the designated recipient is unauthorized and strictly prohibited. If you have received this facsimile in error, please immediately notify the sender by telephone. If you have problems with this trausmittal, please call us at 577-3600. O KEYNOTES: NE413.3 WI /Thn , STLCO3 FN414KCY1 T 515.7E43 Cl f FLAW 2 U04T PEP ELEVIRIC PLAN 3 On P C U 12E FOPS ROT Cr AWAY CAS+ am 4 LIE OF CAM IBEYQC6 M T 5 LIE OF Far WOO u. !' �— E FASCLI TM.WEFT ! _ ) ! CCHCFETE CFI CLAY 140CF RE c,aTfY WY FOCI u" — t_ -.---- ^- - ® a Uaf7REC WA EOM ELL5F-FFE 9-004 ON IRV 0 1 • v ! I e c. a k t ' E A _, ,PUNT ro aomFOA w►now FLOC 1e g fi En M 9G1B Y4•'To-RIGHT "'' t al i : C! _____.______._.4 --'. 11 4 Erl i cUi I ,ILli a , . RI co lNI14 g scxe ii4'•!Q REAR 2 t _ — n N _ 8 II IT ff tt IT P ____"• 1 t ® Q IEl 03 8 3 t Y ._ _._. _ _.—._ — — - .—.._._.—� T —., 000 0© { o II,,, L' ioil:'-'-'°°,I%llillibp 'allII: ., . l, -----------------------":----- st.c. _=_.... _ lig II a JJ II �I IE111111 .11111 El! fir I 1L_ f a l �°°o FRONT ELEVATION w/ Opt. 5th. Bedroom �r•!Q FRONT ELEVATION '2' a srw u«sgwa�src.mdilnansraas�nnilwssTRwn O KEYNOTES: n I mow mit I1-COAT SYS7FY0 UI f FQAH n z u�r�ar:crac FLNi 3 �Pl A9F 'FtLE!7 J$(1E ROOF 4 14WAY t. t telE CF CaRO ccerctra C co S ONE CF ROOF®EYaLb l . ti e / 6 FASCIA RNOETA.BEET ! f OCtCFFFVFANC E CR CLAY ROOF FIE AFFiEY IVFICCF L. ARI —.— �f` jf$ a +aa cngx FUN SILL axeE s anv e L. E gE 0. ,," .,. i no.. i J _ [ al REFER ro bon Fri vnuopir a,a •- i I i 1. :TF{�RIGHTC. c F J N L IE i cEC 1 ! , _,Gw`� };f O-0'FFE .�..T------'- -----.T- ..-._.—.---.-----.—.----- - ---------�--_ — �;` �: some Toro aF REAR . to gc F ❑ ❑ '._ Ell _.1_. - - - - -� - o©000 gu.i g c. CVI '.'--- ---------Z.—"Iiiiillirn4111 —. t_ r C.N II 111 � f II II If I " "I II 1 v7 :, .--_ ,E I II II_ IL 1 f 1L I A.m. Q I` r 1110 a�. FRONT ELEVATION w/ Opt. 5th. Bedroom FRONT ELEVATION :4 a .... r era me ae-a Ir Al Pawl Iral.en Udnr Mal Its �10 M197T-fir r�Ci 9f4 f, Y Ff ` 4`r If4 t Ili AENJIC S 19 ., 0 KEYNOTES: 'Y 3 I 64 4r r CV it Jr• ,r T4 r [ ekftdu xraF"r' r O°MAF ai ...... —_..-....... q �� 9 Q q e�d.mr t tAaeK rriso-Er (�t,r�, {j9 Fes(( AL y - * ....-....r. • • `� .. - 2 Pus po MOWS FOP Qt P..M.56Tt :_ /��1ipt6t(3 AST fKlfA�f gN�rS WAY FWif A 9JQ�i N fpf -�..-.-.F�'{ .............}. _..._. —_.__r. f9 IFf�QE7 TILE FIftW M1FJ�FY EIQ@k HF.SM Cii IT AT I r-Faa ril w HIS ro et Zse 1 a t , ARM i N5r CPT.ZERO 4 WALFACrl%S%CS . 1ilkQ •e ' fQ Al IERQt V.V.AORF3 t PANTE r .n on Pa p t. 8 �QF{ y I g F/OGfICE FOR NI1T,,r3 COIEL6T.RTT.9.I riff•, 2 t I Er c 8 a �8llij�y ©1 5 + faiVir" .._ a +Rom` "' } . I QJ7A1'�Hi$481r PFR IRO 243/I r WAX 25 1 o I I {• q stsE rOC ► t r5 L Vr ., §, 6 TtS ' .{, J,4115 LT FOR YP45 WO :1 1 o �«�� 91L-3� �L ti �', r rlAEf AFE,b 2f 0.R IFF FROhT a 3?PA SPACE j t, A- I i 6 - I WA , I CahCflElE isUrlYORc v- FOlfC 1 i 5}�r '► o ;,.._,�''I O �• • 9 n.Wsv+�EA vu s.FPOlo Pea etua S•. : • .E _ 4=5S a f II ,�•� Q a 3Qx oorAnal vu siva Pet Babel 6.8 �,, kitchen ' ., I a v'eia +"'s c EMXOS riatnra• ±+ Qna ri� a Y2Q1P8aAPILLWKGSOEIro e,s O vt : II i-1----.-ram.. ter_. .-- RN 1311BiTdl1 l r:i 6 50 GIL C✓S WAre i-EA IQa a PurrCRl r ar I , ,co _ E .� w FEERCLAss RA WI SR5$4 FER OUu EA%C e: — r- r t7 i meter gal 2 1 ._- -. :�_ kl' 5 6tq INft00RCQt8lt wr & '. ^+ ,r C14 . �� •1-cbt. -. �� 6 m000 rss t�R/�IE•$'-Y 1 meow$.t:: G] 5363 mid E P 7 kftlf0 aPEWC t 9vrarare B of r uOPi3Nr•Y r! 0 ,�, .. a Airoe wwo,r t•€AU WI MIL 0o09 - . - / rr. I• 20 42Ti flO'WAU.r GP TO WITOI Cat1Q9lTcF aar3-:.• i u M --skigrir G1 C t, NreaLv Nor .... . 14 / tT n r r r e. T� vye � + • iM.E.C. DATA •. eto I • ".ig 3 tt Syr ` � r'i p ray Ana wwvrg,° ! :`= l • - _-ZCT f'yYT a swo s�ttuCELKS R•4•6 s u-30:3 01. ■ r 41:i.ji. --- 2 .i d3 -j�J I'4•.. ,FRENT o0or+ FF-its snUOtrs u•is r `•aiQ�•; I } II ` p Mere ro cera.siET Faa rm,Awl I crosmr r - ( t , , t _._- •---• a Q x BHEARWALL SCHEDULE 131 C:12) r F u lJ04 n ,p 3333 ill CIAO 7 16CT5P 01 Y SS .• r Or Z S 4IIY Fa r I._ - 1 3 t s xr Y s VTMYWS o — „ ! En bed 2 � i I.*AOOA 4 s6r r eert,1, tioaa a tra,onr Y ae 3.T 7 t.., .1- 3TQ ;i:;:• i KlP.Cprl Y W T 7 54' _ T �; :-za d+x.:c:',�scw.v,.e[w LLB ¢ • bed 4 R b a 4,4y..1 v o p�/ m 'Sk�.� u4'7•:.l i?l .l M FJ�L4 , G e 4 :7,. ,cfcrati,IIY7- c3 .it N' -C , zd C .,"tea R�ul�se nw+...;u.ar.�• 2 r ei µ~ V* Tar , Fr r e,r s ,HOLDOWIM SCHEDULE r{� 2 g { 11 '{l Wyss ki .11-4r.-A,`-xF.=7 ej g �-}--� _,/ I �� - - c ,-._ S A Pik042 tw trtr,sn 6T W orse cowl W - y1:� ram' " Cf+i° � ' 4 -- t r y €'kflrlxvn9+ErdaswFiatoDaeY C i t i I _.Y'�+��i:�!NY 55R'bill HT f= ui �t, F '0 01 ,� SQUARE FOOT DATA o entry Mbra - l.. ' _A. ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE lf�= bon-oQ ..a • •llecrv, C _ dIt \ „E— —.O. * I '4..�' -'.�4- �Y-,,s os¢r`ua0i.r r2_c • o / \ / `o 5 --uaa9 •' ,�7,t 4 '\ ,BOAR;S:f I(tl.4NRFR. :-��- a I i, 1 A,0a90n [n • rLi ,' 60839:CrOW&(T GAME E oI .� ' '� �_ - mom Satt . r . - Gx.9:.7�fiia.r.3W.Y=9E"_rC,..rll•W42 ...-..._.�..... nty11 J �� • .M,.�4...Mf • TY JP 54 PV TC Sr Tr rr +.Y• •• �r�...^'� IIRR]III r� �r I Tr r TT ;: r �; 64 r�V.r air 6. _- -......._...._...E_---1 OOR PLAN 4 �t,M ' 1 — -le a 3.555 Err - Cr ¢a A i•C fVM Ysa n.r.�lll,Rwt ral.�.w 17 r1 M1U.wl e.n i f fI a.r Qy QKEYNOTES: AE r�r �, c t4' CT _ Tr rq rr l;T SC '�� t tr tJ#1+GIeeEr - aoe s bL�r ° ' 4 '' 2 ru511c wrurE raR ar ateE sex {: ( —r� Ufa _ I* 3 OAP ET rri.E FLCal nERFr f 60349LMX WY r+rE iii pi _..- V i.4.......................... sc� 4 1EJ01M!eEruiPEAwtiFAC7U889PHS °� KrB1aR 0C r PRQNFE r ; m � F(Fl WV 0 aCx6l8L IRLS r vrn ti I +� Emit- I C1 ' s s+ yntrrrr gascgi a tl ' . _ M Al44B h. ei t191 �O o � � t? SS t8 ?O t ii Qd ry .4 EI@FrlS0E4990 w S s \ . I _=r_._. __''� x. 4 Q b • rc r APFN 9r QR HL{�ir t 77 YA S)10E s 3 m 4 _I firaff B Ci1ICRETE FLArwais PER FQRUSF1619-EfT �. _ o a 9 TUb9Uh�1 w!9JFA011i1 PER ELM Sf�C L'• s • 0 V x Ca KrEl rot sips r$F awes;sm. 0 g a �-1 � r { �� ��•S � � QAffi FtQCSf aEtlRfn 1!Y i r' '1i.'© Q r wrus CEEl4 6. E_ d rq ✓ _ _ EIS:.: x,t�L amo ! 0 L. -da► o�a191 Mao*it ' Ott. u�cH .-. ` 0 so CAL cre wu lsi rfa TER el PLA Few •V ••-� w MAGA%rra wr 9'- PHF&Ian WM V 4441• I (RL i!�: i d►Ao9l0ol7M #€a r novel�rT$-, N n1 nFer ar IL u MEOW? Gf9Pf♦f81E.as1 CPOsr.s.r.. Fill/ �� 9 BAFM dt cD.4IG I. " V L_ W II 8+IICN wrOf7Y+r Ern WI'P&L ooae 26 Pon'NAIi I VP to wro+CQxFJFTC P $ ' L I I61 ..:: ca I � `, -- ----1:: sue s•r Qa m are t / • 5': -f 7 i rs- 4r:_11 j r Ira eFs as �� h: ^ n.Y.m. a . 1 (0 a I f I DI '__ .- �1' +may' _S-m 1�; `+ 1 I �.: b : . _._ .: , .1" ;-----\ ,n 1 I 1 rnPT. GREAT RO / M !A I r �. ......_. . : 1111—\r----j -. E i,. ,---r:"IN(ii - I I! I I. l b !! a bed 4 i I.420, . : I 3 R I - I II ??* :: - } ib� .��jI gygaj( I I 8HEARWALL $CHED1H�F .. v i� 'Z ...-fir `�' r • - i awl.. e�yQ ..i -ram►„ !` �Q`ata a�q s�wa _ ': SiL Q7 CJ 1 I WY tir {r r r,YF /B'i LL I I 97 pw.a r oar r YY 4R Gt9.B¢ dErr17 �sI'L0�3 lyr oII . ss r.�.34 �e r r r@-I, ? OPT. I BEORO 0 NI I Y s 3SwACGt r As s a "Irr' 1, y 3 3rswAWt 'I At rIQ I? NT 33992i ti I ! VT WAN;' -r or S!Q' �'a'u-504 . o -1 N � t.1.0, 1 r!a r l Q c�.Itro 4,; 1 /, \ I -Al7CYfP�941 AWi iG'90+.A1 - ( -- ^ ! 4 ."ocno v m vir'r";'i M 1 IA...AAA,t a at m I_ suu7p�nn...yE,vT�a.�r`� - d t --- I {I� /- N. r.,l -,.. SI V.E.M-.'3},,4.E'..1®�f 6 ` I yf.. p 'JO ,MI _`___ __ -______1._1 /' 1 /, \ ',CAIf4 !•1.r10.4.1.44.5 i�:F,8,e: 1;, N f .3.1. CO .! / \-\ I �I 1 r.a.;xi.+vd6,6,r,aWJ..T)')l[v4� . AVfvr 1' _�-,-1 MOLDOWN SCHEDULE \ 'i ♦'�( �� ,yT-1 hoc:m Irrfi lr�...•c7.:-r t -: .. n1'�C17 el Ci_ 1; Car>< tor5n a)fie,aa.e'�ry�,nra I PAVeelwII!1 erwrF.oJ4e1 ;Stet -� '®PAtCl2 Wf Ili&�f4 aw Fa1:31167 r-v rs S! SF 4 I A y E 2 da K? r 570.�]r Ys • OOR PLAN rwr+L., ,a ,... r;r 1e Sr -- 4r tam 12 �i' ♦ 1n ..ata,r..ni..mrexw.19rdvauwwa 3573 E. Sunrise, Suite 209 Phone: (520) 577-3600 Tucson, Arizona 85718 Fax: (520) 577-0634 License #B/080734 A.F. STERLING Oro Valley Design Review Board General information regarding our Vistoso Gateway Project Number of Lots: 50 Average lot size: 36,926 square feet. Maximum grading allowable: 18,000 square feet(lots 1 through 31) 12,000 square feet(lots 32 through 50) The following is the list of allowable color schemes and allowable combinations of paint and roof tiles. Body Trim Roof Tile Cinnamon Glaze Summer Pecan Carmel Blend Clay Flagstone Blend Kayente Blend Chatham Tan Traditional Tan All Colors Chantrelle Cameo Brown Flagstone Blend Estrella Blend Sun Lakes Blend Barrington Brown Banyon Beige Estrella Blend Flagstone Blend Sun Lakes Blend All concrete tile will either be flat or"S"with a brush finish. All clay tiles are"S"tile Building Square Footages Livable Garage Entry Patio Rear Patio Model 3207: 3207 s.f. 757 s.f. 122 s.f. 163 s.f. 3573 E. Sunrise, Suite 209it Phone: (520) 577-3600 Tucson, Arizona 85718 Fax: (520) 577-0634 License #B/080734 A.F. STERLINGCENP MAY 0 5 2003 Town of Oro Valley May 5, 2003 C/O Susanna Montana 11000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley, Arizona 85731 Subject: Revision to 3207 DRB Submittal This letter is to inform you that the attached 3333 plan is submitted as a substitute to the previously submitted 3207. If you have any questions or comments please contact me at 955-1150. Sincerely, ...,,e_. ,/-)Zi Robert Brack AF Sterling 3573 E. Sunrise, Suite 209it Phone: (520) 577-3600 Tucson, Arizona 85718 Fax: 74 License(520) #B57/08073-0634 A.F. STERLING Oro Valley Design Review Board General information regarding our Vistoso Gateway Project Number of Lots: 50 RECEIVED Average lot size: 36,926 square feet. MAY 0 5 2003 Maximum grading allowable: 18,000 square feet(lots 1 through 31) 12,000 square feet(lots 32 through 50) The following is the list of allowable color schemes and allowable combinations of paint and roof tiles. Body Trim Roof Tile Cinnamon Glaze Summer Pecan Carmel Blend Clay Flagstone Blend Kayente Blend Chatham Tan Traditional Tan All Colors Chantrelle Cameo Brown Flagstone Blend Estrella Blend Sun Lakes Blend Barrington Brown Banyon Beige Estrella Blend Flagstone Blend Sun Lakes Blend All concrete tile will either be flat or"S"with a brush finish. All clay tiles are"S"tile Building Square Footages Livable Garage Entry Patio Rear Patio Model 3333: 3333 s.f. 691 s.f. 316 s.f. 145 s.f. 4 . TOWN OF ORO VALLEY STAFF REPORT TO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING DATE: JUNE 10, 2003 TO: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD FROM: Susana Montana, Planner II SUBJECT: OV13-03-11, AF STERLING HOME BUILDERS LTD, REPRESENTING SCOTIA JOINT VENTURE, REQUESTS ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL FOR MODEL 3333, PLAN A AND B, TO BE BUILT WITHIN THE VISTOSO GATEWAY SUBDIVISION; LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TANGERINE ROAD AND REFLECTION RIDGE DRIVE (PARCEL NOS. 219-510-030, 040, 050 AND 060). BACKGROUND: The Vistoso Gateway subdivision consists of 53.48 acres with a total of 50 lots. The zoning is R1-36, one residence per 36,000 square feet. The final plat was approved, with conditions, by Town Council on January 15, 2003. One of the conditions of the subdivision final plat (General Note No. 34) states: "The same elevation and floor plan shall not be repeated without at least a three lot separation." On January 14, 2003 the Design Review Board reviewed and approved three model homes for this subdivision (0V13-02-32). Two of those models (numbers 2842 and 2787) reflected a Spanish Colonial-style architecture and one (number 2300) provided a choice of either a Spanish Colonial-style or a Pueblo-style facade. On February 11, 2003, the Board reviewed and approved model number 2300 which featured a choice of either a Spanish Colonial- or Pueblo-style façade. There are grading limits for this subdivision. Lots 1-31 have a maximum grading limit of 18,000 square feet and lots 32- 50 have a maximum grading limit of 12,000 square feet. The plat also designates a conservation easement within various lots along the west side of the subdivision, which further limits the buildable area of the lots. In addition, Ordinance No. (0) 01-19 which rezoned parcels 291-510-040, 050 and 060 from R1-144 to R1-36 stipulated that 15 acres of land west of the wash within the property be donated to the Town for the sole purpose of right-of-way for the La Canada extension and that Reflection Ridge Drive be modified as necessary to provide separate southbound right and left turn lanes at its intersection with Tangerine Road (OV9-00-04). As a result of these limitations, the individual lots within the subdivision are smaller and more severely-constrained. SUMMARY: The proposed model (No. 3333)reflects a Spanish Colonial style and features the following elements: • 3,333 sf. house; • 3-car, 691 sf. garage; • 122 sf covered entry and 163 sf rear patio; • Floor Plan A with a 5th bedroom and a front elevation with full window bay and a Floor Plan B with 4 bedrooms and a front elevation with clerestory windows for the front facing master bath; and • Building height at 17 feet. This model is similar to the Spanish Colonial model No. 2842 which was approved by the Development Review Board on January 15, 2003. { • III v TOWN OF ORO VALLEY STAFF REPORT TO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Page 2 of 4 Town of Oro Valley Zoning Code, Revised Design Guidelines The following Design Guidelines are applicable: • OVZCR Section 16-103E.1.c.— "A variety of garage placements is encouraged" When the final plat was approved, the following condition was specified(General Note No. 33), "The setbacks for the houses shall vary so that no two units are equally aligned." The architectural submittals do not show how this condition will be met and, therefore, Condition No. 1 of Exhibit A is recommended to ensure this requirement is met. • OVZCR Section 16-103 E.3.b.4.— "Garages for three cars should have the third portion offset from the other two. The model features a two-feet offset differentiating the single-car entry from the two-car entry of the garage. • OVZCR Section 16-103E.3.b.— "De-emphasize garages on street frontages". 1. The garage should consist of not more than 50%of the total building frontage. The garage is 30 linear feet, representing 40%of the 75 feet wide frontage. 2. Garages may project no more than five (5)feet in front of a house (unless side entry) and must have an entry feature or porch to moderate the visual impact of the garage. The garage extends approximately 24 feet from the building plane of the house. On May 5, 2003 the Applicant submitted a revised plan that would provide a covered entryway and walled courtyard that would provide additional building plane dimension to the front elevation, thereby diminishing the visual dominance of the garage. Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District (TRCOD), OVZCR Section 10-001 The Vistoso Gateway subdivision is located within the TRCOD; therefore, all architectural submittals to the Development Review Board shall comply with OVZCR Section 10-006. Architectural Design: Buildings constructed in the Tangerine Road Corridor should be low and of colors, materials and textures, which blend with natural desert vegetation. The architectural style of the single-story model home provides a low profile, earth tone colors, and stucco facades which blends in with the natural desert vegetation. Building Materials: Building materials that respond to community desires for southwestern and ranch-type design themes...should predominate the Tangerine Road Corridor. The model home will consist of a masonry stucco finish providing a Spanish Colonial southwestern design theme. Building Colors:Building colors should relate to one another and the natural environment on the basis of pigment, color value and/or intensity. In the Tangerine Corridor, earth tones and pastels are encouraged. The proposed body color, trim color&roof tile comply with the standards set forth in the TRCOD. Preliminary Plat General Notes The following general notes are applicable: • "Garages shall not constitute more than 50% of the front façade of the house and that the garages will not TOWN OF ORO VALLEY STAFF REPORT TO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Page 3 of 4 project more than 5 feet in front of the house". The model meets this requirement. • "The setbacks for the houses shall vary so that no two units are equally aligned". Condition No. 1 reiterates this requirement. • "The same elevation and floor plan shall not be repeated without at least a three lot separation". Condition No. 2 reiterates this requirement. • All roof mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened from view and the color of roofing materials will blend in with the landscape". Condition No. 3 reiterates this requirement. GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE: The proposed model complies with the General Plan Community Design Elements. In particular, Policy 9.1F, which states: "All sides of buildings may impact their surroundings and should be coherently designed and treated". In addition, to promote fire safety, Condition number 4 would require fire prevention treatment of the chimney. PUBLIC PRESENTATION: Pursuant to Resolution (R) 98-31, "all presentations before Boards, Commissions and Council of rezonings, subdivision plats, development plans, and planned area developments must be formatted to be shown on the Town's projection system or overhead system. The Planning and Zoning Administrator; however, may exempt certain projects." A presentation must be designed to insure that the audience, staff, and voting body can view the graphics. Examples of acceptable computer formats are Power Point, Arc View, a videotape presentation, presentation boards and/or overhead transparences. The applicant is responsible for the development,presentation, and coordination of all presentation materials. If an applicant does not conform to the aforementioned resolution, the item may be continued due to non-compliance. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Architectural approval for AF Sterling Model Home No. 3333 (Plan A and B), subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit"A" SUGGESTED MOTIONS: The DRB may wish to consider one of the following motions: I move to approve OV13-03-11, Architecture for AF Sterling Model Home No. 3333, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit"A". OR I move to approve OV13-03-11, Architecture for AF Sterling Model Home No. 3333, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit"A"and the following additional condition(s): OR I move to deny OV13-03-11, Architecture for AF Sterling Model Home No. 3333, finding that Attachments: 1. Exhibit"A"conditions of approval. 2. Subdivision Plat 3. Elevations/Floor Plans/Color palette TOWN OF ORO VALLEY STAFF REPORT TO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Page 4 of 4 EXHIBIT "A": AF Sterling Homes request for Architectural Approval of Model No. 3333 for Vistoso Gateway Project, OV13-03-11 1. The setbacks for the houses shall vary so that no two units are equally aligned. 2. The same elevation and floor plan shall not be repeated without at least a three lot separation. 3. All roof mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened from view and the color of roofing materials will blend in with the landscape. 4. Any vents and chimneys must terminate per manufacturer listing and are subject to review by Planning and Zoning and the Town Building Official. A cap must be placed over the spark arrestor. O KEYNOTES• REVISIONS BY El I STUCC( i(1-COAT SYSTEM)0/r FOAM 1 - 2 LIGHT F CTRIC PLAN 'y 3 OPT.FIREPLACE FLLE/7 ABOVE ROOF 1(7 AWAY ' :... (FLASH AS REM) �s, 4 LINE OF CEILING(BEYOND) .4 %."%* **""%%** ) 5 LINE OF ROOF(BEYOND) 8 d -- - _ - - __ -r....................7:***'. 6 FASCIA PER DETAIL SHEET i 7 CONCRETE OR CLAY ROOF TILE(VERIFY W/ROOF U U d U FRAMING PLAN) • �r--- --- 8 ARCHITECTURAL FOAM SILL MIFERE SHOWN ON ELEV.ill tl M .- 1 Li i i r. r A _ REFER TO 8IDT1 FOR WINDOW BUCK : e p O a $ ... L - ---- E Li SCALE:V4.4-0- RIGHT i 't; o � RI E isgl J. C g MCI A r i .., 5 4, a■�0'-0•FFE _. ii o g - SCALE:1/4•-1*-0• REAR g 1 E % O i d d LI LI ld d U U , cL_-_________ 8' J _8• W r------� -- r-- —; � -- 1 N . i . . tV az r0 O 000 n ai � t` t` E LLl g LO ul SCALE:V4•r 0• LEFT - . a ^ W s s 1 d d d d d d LI —LI LI d �► d d d d es d d La — *f-jit. . -. 1+0. l l >: **********• 4' Q •4" .� Plan t b • I, !03taMab03 i t` t` _� I' —— .e I]awn J.Anderson • — rn II r I Job 03003 L� A Steal 0.-0'F.F.E. I —— 0 0•F FRONT ELEVATION w/ Opt. 5th. Bedroom SCALE:V4--1-0' FRONT ELEVATION ■ a n meets If this sheet Is It x IT all listen srales are i/9 of the stated Size O KEYNOTES■ REVISIONS BY n 1 STUCC H(1-COAT SYSTEM)0/I FOAM --- / 2 LIGHT I ECTRIC RAN , 3 OPT.FIREPLACE FLUE 17 ABOVE ROOF KY AWAY (FLASH AS REDO.) ; 4 LINE OF CEILING(BEYOND) — 5 LINE OF ROOF(BEYOND) " „ 1. 6 FASCIA PER DETAIL SFEET z - - -- - - - - - - - -— - 7 CONCRETE OR CLAY ROOF TILE(VERIFY W/ROOF g FRAMING RAN) c 1---1 ram=-- rr—_- 8 ARCHITECTLRAL FOAM SILL(WFERE SHOWN ON ELEV.I C. 1 1 ■ M I 11v l I 1, 1, � o n a M n g ■ n n n z 4. � o a — 1 — J !I REFER TO SIDT1 FOR WINDOW BUCK T. g p i O SCALE:V4-4-0- RIGHT M 7 , 4 ._ ✓ ... _-'%'%"%%."%.*.%**%%%T:*'%'*'%'*"'-%%'*'%.%.."----.....s„ L., �-� g m 133 NI CZ i I I l I I I J J I 1 = •(.:111:11t +3 •4 - (7-0'FFE d —.— g. SCALE:1/4--r-0- REAR 13 1 IiCO ('------—-— - - - - - - - - - - - -——- - - - -— , I I - — 6� Lit i • 1 1 1 0 t 8 g g chi Q OHO fV - -- --- -- — — fi IlI G V) II) SCALE:V4--r-0- LEFT - x a t'�t _- too �- .•-•<..e...... • t -- Iu W - O- L I__ .0- +Q- Q `m — -7- — L 7-.1?- r---- r \ ..*****. r *4. + +r 3333 I .— oar 1 Arxfer rear son � o3 — J— h. ti LYawn I 1 n I i r °Sne.kbel?3003 _ __ _ ,_ , .,.._ ,., M FRONT ELEVATION w/ Opt■ 5th. Bedroom SCALE.V4.-r-0- FRONT ELEVATION �3. 2. 1 or n sleet, If this sheet Is ir a IT all listed soaies are 1/2 of the stated sin OF k_ REFEFlsTO/1VDTf S INTERSECTING SI-EAR SIDE r 4 s 1r r ts'r u'9 IT-3' REVISIONS L • 3 j 7 5'S 5'4' 4' • 1'$ • 4'6' • 3 T T-T 77 9 8-3• O YNOTES• BY NOT ALL EXT.WALLS TO BE BALLOON FRAMED .) T UPPER CABINET BOTTOM CI IORD OF TRUSS OR TOP OF PARAPET(UOAI) 5 5 5 CEILING HEIGHTS ARE FOR GENERAL REFERENCE ON, • T ----r,_ t -O 9Q56 x ------ -O - -� XOX O `_ 2 PLASTIC LAMINATE TOP 0/BASE+361 l � CEILINGS AT FLAT ROOF AREAS MAY HAVE A SLIGHT PITCH �I ( F--+ _-__+_�+ IR- ____ Q �. 3 THINSET TILE FLOOR(VERIFY EXTENTS? ALL EXT. INT.BEARING 8 SI-EAR WALLS TO BE 2x6 4 OPT.ZERO CLEARANCE FIREPLACE W!TILE Lt HF.STUD GRADE AT E'O. UxO. n I-EARTH/INSTALL PER MANUFACTURERS SPECS. y Y (REFER TO INTERIOR ELEVATIONS)/PROVIDE r 8 CLEARANCE FOR VENT TO COMBUST.MILS./VTR E • to'° 11 act 6, 1D CLG Gal 5 ARCHPAD AITECTURAL BUILDBTUSI/REFERPROVIDE E EV CONC. z S FOR 9 ,• family ADDITIONAL INFOFiftMTION z, 4---• --- b c CLG v 6 DRYER VENT PER IRC 2437.1/MAX 25' § t MINUS 5'FOR EVERY 90 DEC.BEND • i•(j1 4060 T 4,8' 3-9' 1' 3': • 12'-5- . E s.»� ELLIPSE TOv t t •t., MINUS 2.5'FOR EVERY 45 DEC.BEND q i '.37 19 �° 7 TOILET AREA 2I'CLA IN FRONT x 30'W.SPACE . 8 r. t. t;, ,/ O 33050 FG 8 CONCRETE FLATWORK PER FOUNDATION SFfET F �� 9 TUB/SHOWER W/SURROUND PER BLOB.SPEC 6 POLE§ o • d w vs'a � Gil i 10 30'H.COUNTER W/SINUS)PER BUILDER SPEC. o y b si S1iVS S,. •• RAi / 11 SHOWER W/SAFETY GLASS ENCLOSJ SURROUND kitchen DISP 7-7-I--r &PAN PER BUILDER SPEC. I C/7 0 C 10'CLG ;-;_�_T_F_1; 30 b 12 V2'GYPBD.AT ALL WALLS,CEILING 6 STRUCRPA(i5 O r— Tex JO -- MEMBERS OF GARAGE 4 •— ,�, DW ENTERTAIN , � 4 , „ Ci 50 GAL.GAS WATER I-EATER ON PLATFORM7:3-if.-, ,---- �"- © ' '' ` • • 14 FIBERGLASS TUB W/SPLASH PER BUILDER SPEC. , C.I tp masterIiving 1...y. I I I Pas T 15 CHANGE IN FLOORCOVERING MATERIAL ---- IO BP 4--t 17 ARCHED OPENING/SPRINGLtNE*8'6 !MIDPOINT+9 r d O O SPA 2 18 BREAK IN CEILING II 19 ALIGN WINDOW 1-EAD W/ADJ.DOOR R ._ i �T Ire. • aG d 4 20+421 I PONYWALL I CAP TO MATCH COUNTERTOP s Ova , _ -- MN I 1,, c CLG tv �� ♦ O. .. I£ —•- —— _ 3'-4' 9'•1-T• 3'-T 1 7-6' ,4T+ 4'c t7 5 v��}� v ; 'S • 3 22 7 6 U T •47p, I 2-6:1) 3 •IV AC 0 5'�' - 3 ,t -� ��. ,t g g 7 7, ats PLUMING WALL •--•-1, M.E.C. DATA 13 .V If g 0 , - -- 000 M 1T 40 to INSULATION'LS R-19 WIN IX D'° U 3 4 ® tom► --- PIS •,. r CETILINGS R-30 OPERABLE U-.87 = - - 2*D.SKvS _ T 17 EMI S.: T bat ; 1 Z Ail. r STUCCO SYSTEM R-4.T7 SLIDER U- 80 • 1 ' Ill -- tO FRONT DOOR R-176 SKYLIGHTS U-13 i ED "---" _� r----• 2868 0'CLG "-j REFER TO DETAIL SFEET FOR TYP.WALL&CLG SECT o • 2868 -? 1w II D I I, I I F�2 2868 C) SHEARWALL SCHEDULE 3 W c� 14 3 M I IIIhall Alt AA IBC ATTIC, ;� d O PAS sue.m.Iiatl sa s�A( GP. C� Ut I I. + Ss 17 17 1Q �'a ti I 97 GYP.ea N 5d r r V7 48' 00 CO �07 2 VT GYP. Y Sd T T V7 48' 25 IA i- ®O 5 DROP L___J 2 g}}t}}{ t I 3 V2'GYP.Imo. Y 5d 4' 4' V7 48" IS50 s S Z = 2 �d I dining 4 Sig GYP.ea Y sd 4' 4' (/7 48' 175 8 a� CO n� O `e� FAU 1 A :: � L- M J S aG O 9 1 N Qi i 5 318 APA COX Y 8d 6' 17 V7 37 260 m J = �p I bed v - ] 6 3l8'APA COX Y ad 4' 17 V2' 24' 380 re i Y- --' IT-7 7 ID T 9 H 4`5- 66— 6 FG - 1 p' LG � 7 318 APA CQ1( Y 8d 3' 12 5/8 24' 490 ILL•CPT.2�68 TT TBrP. ' 9 V7 WA CDX' Y 10d 7 12' 3/4' 24- '3 g 0 2 �1.36 SOST••- ' 0 DDC-1 to 2 nFoR ot used ATION OF S EAA WALLS.SEE FLOOR PLAN _s 0 © O 3 ALL PLYWOOD PANEL EDGES SHALL BE BLOCKED W/2x FRAMING 5` 0 b•• 4 PROVIDE(2)2x STUDS OR POST AT END OF ALL SHEAR WALLS&LSE MIN S E U. Cg p/� .O (2)ANCHOR BOLTS AT SPEAR WALLS �y e+ entry . , QG I NAIL GYP30.AT N1 STJLT5 TOP d BOTTOM PLATE A BLOCXING/DRYWALL E �••FG •�� NAILS OF SAE SIZE&SPACING MAY BE USED IN LIEU OF COOLER NAILS 8 t7 _ SQL 2868 , OFT.AT AT.s�EARwALLs MIA.-ALn Kwnc BOLTS WI z 3/4 Et43®.ILO.AB s 7 AT SPEARWALL TYPES 8 B 9/3'NOMINAL MEMBERS SHALL BE USED AT N O t PANEL.JOINTS �- S�IOco O 3-t0��•t$ 1 4'3' T 3 a 5 7 B AT DEL SIDED GYPBD.SfARWALLS AB S TO 37 OC a. R ` garage �; nHOLDNS WN�SCHEDULE N 8 9'CLG -, & PAI-D42 W/(16)16dS (Vt 1 t FR I CtUD - S cg • I© PO , •lo At PAHD42 W/(16)160C(S t8'1(I1t FROM C CFMR1 y 10 0 is r t 10 2 ® MTT288 INTO DBL.S�TD. W/(24)I6dS/3/4' tv • bed O, HREADED ROO WNSPEC I D NT W/HILT!HTT € Lu In Lc) _ set I� t t tr. 1C CLG , EPDXY(S CIAL I REOD) c7 v� /- .\ IISQUARE FOOT DATA tQ 2466 a' 1st FL FAY 316: .wuo A•09 • I / \ I T M---• tat FL Qp8G0 145 Pm a Y . 2Pis I. 'Q'� Z ;� I SECT tr(TL GAFLAOT11L 1L era 4486 A'�20r _ _ 16oeo SECTIONAL METAL GARAGE 000R\, 1p - � ` ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE Cr.37 / NRow Floor Walls ill L /Notes 1' IN > " "a.=taint)ata,C l0(IV0(J,do.. 42 • �� > o s y 0 ' • . o 6� - n 2-costs sera-does aemel,IVI -0 LL Copyright 2003 Anderson Studio Architects.Inc,all rights reserved. v r _$ v— o�o'" 'mod(Corm[duos . ---.� 2,m'1.y71-v & & c.taped loots.I-mat Pat latim - Q ---- Opt.7 C a.�xL Cot 5tr Belo)m entry • ! 8 arnily a m Plan 3333 kitchen. i' b rook lei b k Date Mar 03 living le a t 4°-r 6-5 . 4 dint a OrawnJ.Anderson I 6 7 • 7-10' I 1D'-6' • 3'-10 ��tlllty • �6 Jab 03003 ,« TT 23,-4' 1-6• I'2'-IT • 5 gar • a98 i C - te_ t la • 220. • 26-4. • IT-8 • bath 2 i, .b�(trlyl in iced nitro*h warier• 74' master i a 4 2 s 1 SCALE:V4'-T-0" FLOOR PLAN r 2-" I '�-- �a D I(this sheet is 11-a IT all I1S15A soales are I/7 of the stated S17e + — V To-1 '� 17 5_ 0 =YN O T E S• REVISIONS BY 4' 4'� 4'6 3''T T 9 T 4' 6'-7 6'-3' i. r 1 UPPER CABINET i -' i . iri2lar...2 8� �•- -- ©-- -0-- - - . 2 PLASTIC LAMINATE TOP 0/BASE+36 H} 3 THINSET TILE FLOOR(VERIFY EXTENTS) 0 SH_V i •S. 0 = ,. I`'+ +==J+ 1�-- --- 4 OPT.ZERO CLEARANCE FIREPLACE W/TILE g HEARTH/INSTALL PER MANUFACTURERS SPECS. in N• Y CLEARANCE FR TO TOR VENT ERIOR LTO COMBUST. ILEVATIONS)/ S VTR patio b nook 5 ARCHITECTURAL BUILD OUT:PROVIDE CONC. to 10'CLG ti, = -Ai.. o r PAD AT BUILD-OUTS/REFER TO ELEVS FOR 'R F ' ADDITIONAL INFORMATION :, media 6 DRYER VENT PER IRC 2437.1/MAX 25' § it MINUS 5'FOR EVERY 90 DEG.BEND Y M 6-3'bo 5-3' 7-5' 3'-6' 7-7 2'-5' c� 8 �LL41 T0� �, •� ��, MINUS 2.5'FOR EVERY 45 DEG BEND a o — I I to 7 TOILET AREA:2f CLR.IN FRONT x 30'W.SPACE g • 2 :r tv PR 2668 : 8 CONCRETE FLATWORK PER FOUNDATION SHEET -N p t. • • I • I I - I _ 9 TUB/SHOWER W/SURROUND PER BLDR.SPEC&POLI a c • o 2 (T; • " 0 30'H.COUNTER W/SINC(S)PER BUILDER SPEC. J . . n a 1 11 SHOWER W/SAFETY GLASS ENCLOSJ SURROUND �; FEF &PAN PER BUILDER SPEC. C4 SoACE � � r r r� I I kitchen r-i-1-T-r-r i 12 1/ GYPBO.AT ALL WALLS CEILING &STRUCTURALi 0 ch L_J 10'CLG rr�-,O-i i--- MEMBERS OF GARAGE ■ } b -, ENTERTNN 13 50 GAL.GAS WATER HEATER ON PLATFORM 3 .a, I� T' 1 14 FIBERGLASS TU3 W/SPLASH PER BUILDER SPEC. �' V x tb � ---- 2 P8S 15 CHANGE IN FLOOFiCOVERING MATERIAL (o eat m. • 16 ARCHED OPENING/SPRINGLINE+8'-4'/MIDPOINT+B'-84 � N ' ac 7666 TRIPLE BP 17 ARCI•ED OPENING/SPRINGLIKE+8'-6'l MIDPONT+9-f 5 I� 18 BREAK IN CEILING '•"� ---- S 19 ALIGN WINDOW F-EAD W/ADJ.DOOR4 IL, ._ i ' 20 +42'1-1 PONYWALL/CAP TO MATCH COUNTERTOP $ J -�, we. i - • 2te 8 a lir-- (-- . RIM E 41)I p, _,_ ,_ I �;�' 3 7 9 9 3-2' I t B...,,, >,is,0•7/ c'S \\, t• '11 2B6B • 1 pa�G architectsli, .Inc. 5$2 t-4'j 6 k •Jf t -8 7-7 iii � � T. GREAT1106 / M DCD CD Ur � ,� yJ � O - 1. I Or H- --- ---.moo i i --I0 10 0 - ---- �— 1 Jr a L__- I I FAU 2 e7 • • �. - I I 8 '6 _ M I 1 hall - Ci) n _, 1 I `rj 42 Ija 30 B CO JL �, § O • -Z . L__( — >�CLG bed3 .o, 7It-7 7-10' 1 9 7 45 1 I , m 3 • 0 Z b:3 . et r--- 10.G 4. 6 ...I' 1 c, C. 81 a 4, , N Q 0.0i 6, O. r N ca t, C° 8 1 to Kati 1---- if) ?-4' t 4'-3' 7-3 t- 5'-7O. ali i i ". �A 2 3 SHEARWALL SCHEDULE a a s :o / \ /\ -_ % �' 1 V7 GYP.BD. N 5d T 1/T 2 48' 00 I / \ / / NIP bed 52+se 2 V7 GYP.al 5d T r 1/7 48' 25 w 3 V7 GYP.80 Y Sd 4' 4' V7 4B' ISO Z / \ + p� I 4 5/8'GYP.BD. Y 6d 4' 4' V7 48' 175 �, � /' / \\ k' • 6 3/e'APA COX Y 8d 4' 2' 1/7 380 y • /' \ to 5050 XO •I-• 7 3/8'APA COX Y 8d 3 17 5/8' 24' 490 2 /' SILL 3T 8 V2'APA COX ' Y bd 3' 17 3/4' 24' 600 p Iv �_ 9 V2'APA COX I Y 10d 7 17 3/4' 24' 770 d M • --- f ;f 2 not used OF SHEAR WALLS.SEE FLOOR PLAN LL Copyright 2003 Anderson Studio Architects,Inc.,all rights reserved. iQ • '° 3 ALL PLYWOOD PANEL EDGES SHALL BE BLOCKED W/2x FRAMING 8 ~• 5050 XO ` 4 PROVIDE 12)2x STUDS OR POST AT END OF ALL SHEAR WALLS&LSE MIN. a + • • - r2J ANCHOR BOLTS AT SITAR WALLS OpL 2'Oar.Ext. Ai © © 5 NAIL GYPBD.AT ALL STUDS.TOP d BOTTOM PLATE 8 BLOCKING/DRYWALL NAILS OF SASE SIZE 6 SPACING MAY BE USED IN LIEU OF COOLER NAILS .Plan OPT. 5 t h BEDROOM 6 OPT.AT INT.SFEARWALLS 1/2T7IA HIUI OK BOLTS W/2 3/4'MED.ILO.AEI's 7 AT 9-EARWALL TYPES 8 6 9/3'NOMINAL SEMBFRS 9-1ALL BE USED AT PANNEL JOINTS Date Mar 03 8 AT COL SIDED GYPBD.SFEARWALLS ABS: TO BE 32'O.C. .n 4 HOEDOWN SCHEDULE 1Q aaWnd Anderscxi ��• n• •tom 7-q1. Q ON Y-c EOY�Ns W'HOLD TR1ANGl PS HA'VF RFPN,;SF Z a, 3 • 0 20' . w' • , G 30' A PAHD42 W/(16)160d's ►et F C• • ,-22 Suet . 74' • © MTT2A8p�IN�TO STD. W/(24)fIeDtv_ENW/H LTI HTT ° 2_ 2 SCALE:V4--r-o' FLOOR PLAN EPDXY(SPECIAL INSP/ ECTION HEOD) d get, It this Sheet IS 11'a 1r all listed scales are.1/7 nt the stated SI7R— VISTOSO GATEWAY A. F. T�' ERL1�1vG BODY TRIM CINNAMON GLAZE SUMMER PECAN CHATHANI TAN TRADITIONAL TAN CHANTRELLE CAMEO BROWN BARRINGTON BROWN _: : t► I E -' '---- '-,- .,,,,,,s,W-$.,.--1,,,,713,...C,E,.'4,1,t,P,,,,-.,,,,,."------„,,,,,,,,-;--.'..------.....-- - • ' -1,-;.'.,_,W.:*%,e4-7i.i----;40-q:•;:•#i',--P -1:-. .--..-.- --. , • , . , - - . 42-,,,.,„hl,„.1'.--t---AK•tVAriti ,---•,i'Nr-r.2.-,;.-:;;:?i,rii..---:,!-,- -: -_r • -.1',r----,-: -'-ig8-!Rti,.:z17_4•.1.;:i',W-i,`,'-'-.:.-7•.'--,'L..-,-,•,-..,-.7.-:--:'-,.: . • - . -,:-A',:it'-t'--,*-t.-fVto-f,-,;'t,',.:.f.i-:::7.,,,,;!-..t'.:':'-'_,=:,4-.:;_i'-::_' :::_:---.ir-.-,--,_-• . -,.,„ ..... ..,.. . _.. . . ..---...„.....— .. .. ,. . . , Phoot, (5101S77.3.400 Too., , Ar4-(.123.8..47t8 Lt. 1.520)S77-063-4 - - • A.F. • STERLING ........• ,. -.:..-:...t,,,,,raok...,..,_ • .. *12272 IESTIMLUt IMAM 4 ..Ili! OSIII.I. - - t.••,.,.:,,,,,.,-''..--••,•1,.-'--_-i,'•,,- 'L 1:i..,i''.'i...e-1i•1'1.I f- - .4.,t 'I-{1l-i:,',.;,1.„..'..-...;...--....,.-'„-,-•.1?.,:f,,..—,'-.,;,7-... , .-,,-,4Z,,',''....,.,-,,.,.,.,. , ,..,.-,,,.,,_,..,..„..,,..-......„........,...,...........-_..„......„1 1 _ 4 . ,.....,..:..... ...„, ....._ _.. . . . •,,,-,._,„.„........ ':?,-. : I 1.1 11 , r., t t--,...-•::_-:. 1 ,,,,,,t _ — ,\., -,.! --.,,,. . —... '! ,' .— :-.---,---,:7-.;---11-:.ii -'-',.--..---• .' 4-. • .' -'''.'''' ,..-4:."-1614441tf"--7,.-r- ''''' - - -- -'''.-.L'•''.. '-.'-'-'''''.--- '.....,:j0 ..---'.' '- 1 f I I, ;' --, -. . -..1 - . , )- ' ,.• _ .: _.--.-...11401111111t. . . , ---• •••-• ---',••'---,•-- •-• - -'-- ••••-• - • • .i t- - .1 •-- '''''., ' •.---'''' •• • ' - - it ,I;" ,,•r'"' - "7"I''''''' . '-.---:-.:`',.--,,,.,•-•---''',.'-.-_::.,.1.:,..-,.,2- -7.; :2 t'::;_'.':--'-*.i • ' 1 i .i r t' : --. -, ,,-,;,',,' -4,'''' ' 3%.• - Jill'• --- • -e --.,'`.--. ---7--.t." -,37.-•,. 1 '- . -1 - ' t. '- ;' '-. .-d!'-,7''i,;2' f: ,' -. .. ,.- .,..-__... „-,..,,,-..• ..,..---,.,-.: -----:-...----.T.,44...„ -el .... .!,,,,,t_i ,4 . \., _ ., : ,,,i___,,, 4 . I i i 1 ri'- -: '''' ''''''1 r '1 i t il ,,1,:..'.."-,47''..ZI,";•.,: ,:%7:1.,-;»,„,111.:, s-7,..''....4-„.i.' „., „...-,_ :,:: •''' '',. -.I..,, . ,i4- 4, ... t ,f,..i! ti if ..,1i-. 7.- .. --,'!„--:.-. . ' . 1 ,, .-• -'-'-, ..7- -2, -......:.2..--42::...,,- ';'-'4'.---. I t- t1 t .--' f., , ..../. „ - ,,,-.,•-„,„'.. .,...,..... . .,-- -,. .-•.-•:',------ - - -L.,. ..._ .,.......:---.-:-..:-;='-.:--....-.':-.•:•,---.•-:'---':;----- •-' '."7-;-',.' -'• •-.-,.„:,-;--.:,,t--'4.---'--- ' B ,:,. . .___ -__..._.._-_-_-_-__„ , , „,,,,..__ ......, , ,. _., r - ..,-..-• -•,7.1 I lena Liav, _.„.•..- .......:: ,...„,..,•:„.,,.,.,,,,,„..:......„_..,„...,„ ,ftstn.a . , 012220 OLI214 MS 1111• 012211,013280 KAYENTA BlEt40 Sono'.Blend 34-..f I SILP4 LikliCf.ftl.E.,:" FLAGSTOME&LEND ,...,..- . • ' .,"... ..... .,---•- -.-' ,'-':--',;.';',--.-*:,---,:-:,-.''..:,,,, '.,-• :-",-.'-,...41.',%).:k^. 3. ''' 4,-.---- _ . -..• '. ..,-,-.. ,• ..., .N''-- , • '- , - • ' '•, ,-;--',..=. , • ."- ...„ -. . „- ' .. "-,' • , ;--''''''',. 4.--'--•-• --.- -. - -;. .; :-;; - . _ . •. . , --. : . -„_ : ,..-:. ._--,- MINUTES OF THE ORO VALLEY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING TUESDAY, JUNE 10, 2003 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11,000 N.LA CANADA DRIVE REGULAR MEETING CALL TO ORDER: 6:04 p.m. PRESENT: Jim Vogelsberg, Chair Nancy Mager,Vice Chair Clark Reddin,Member Richard Feinberg, Member Jeff Weatherford, Member Mary Caswell, Member ALSO PRESENT: Bayer Vella, Senior Planner Craig Civalier, Development Review Division Manager Bob Conant, Planner II Kristina Curry, Secretary II ABSENT: Al Kunisch,Member CALL TO AUDIENCE Chairman Vogelsberg opened the meeting to public comment for Call to Audience. Bill Adler, 10720 N. Eagle Eye Place, reported that the description of the Call to Audience was inaccurate and not consistent with the Open Meeting Law. Additionally, he stated that the minutes from the last meeting were incomplete, inaccurate, and did not represent what the public specified on Agenda Item 2. He submitted copies of recent minutes from other Town meetings which he felt did a far superior job of reflecting the public's statements. He requested that future minutes be completed in such a manner, and that the DRB direct staff to amend the minutes from the last meeting. Chairman Vogelsberg closed the meeting to public comment for Call to Audience. REVIEW OF MAY 13,2003 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MINUTES Chairman Vogelsberg noted the minutes from the last meeting were expanded upon by staff regarding Agenda Item 2. Member Caswell corrected page 5, Item 7 by stating that she questioned the modular buildings, not Vice Chair Mager. 6/10/2003 Development Review Board Minutes Page 2 MOTION: Member Weatherford moved to approve the May 13, 2003 Development Review Board Minutes as revised and corrected. Member Feinberg seconded the motion. Motion carried 6-0. CONSENT AGENDA A. OV13-03-11, A.F. STERLING HOMES REQUESTS ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL OF A MODEL HOME, NUMBER 3333, FOR THE TANGERINE HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TANGERINE ROAD AND REFLECTION RIDGE DRIVE (PARCEL NOS. 219- 510-030, 040, 050 AND 060). The Applicant was granted architectural approval for three model homes by the Development Review Board on January 15, 2003 (0V13-02-32) and a fourth model on February 11, 2003 (0V13-03-03). One of the conditions of approval of that application was that "the same elevation and floor plan cannot be repeated without at least a three lot separation". This fifth model would further enable the Applicant to meet this condition. B. OV13-03-21, BUILDER "DOUCETTE HOMES" REQUESTS ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL FOR FIVE MODEL HOMES TO BE BUILT ON 17 LOTS WITHIN THE RIVER'S EDGE, LOTS 103 - 120 SUBDIVISION; LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LAMBERT LANE AND NORTH SHORE DRIVE (PARCEL NOS. 224-280-870 THROUGH 224-281-030). The Applicant proposes five (5) model homes for the last phase of this subdivision. The models range in size from 1,957 square feet (sf), including garage,to 2,659 sf. Three of the models feature 2 stories and two features 1 story. One model features a garage accessed from the side of the house. MOTION: Member Weatherford moved to approve Consent Agenda Items A &B. Vice Chair Mager seconded the motion. Motion carried 6-0. REGULAR AGENDA 1. OV12-03-05, LITTLEJOHN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, REPRESENTING NORTHWEST MEDICAL CENTER — ORO VALLEY REQUESTS APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A 96 BED HOSPITAL WITH ASSOCIATED USES OF EMERGENCY, OUT-PATIENT AND ADMINISTRTIVE USES AND A MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING OF 70,000 SQUARE FEET ON 37.72 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TANGERINE ROAD AND INNOVATION PARK DRIVE, PARCEL 223-020- 23A F:\Minutes\DRB\2003\6-10-03 minutes.doc Approved 7/8/03 2 6/10/2003 Development Review Board Minutes Page 3 Bob Conant introduced the staff report into the record. Staff recommended that DRB recommend that the Town Council approve the Northwest Medical Center— Oro Valley Development Plan, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit A. Staff Conditions: 1. A Master Sign Program shall be developed and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. Public Art shall be approved by the Town Council for the Hospital building and the Medical Office Building prior to the issuance of building permits. 3. Indicate the design speed and vehicle for the project as a General Note per Section 4- 504(C)(16)of the OVZCR. 4. Show the pre and post developed flows for the 100-year event per Section 4-504(D)(1)(a) of the OVZCR. 5. Show the size and materials of all existing utility piping. 6. Provide a revised drainage report. 7. Provide a revised traffic impact report. 8. It will be the responsibility of the developer to conduct a traffic signal warrants study to determine if traffic signals are justified at driveway B. If a traffic signal is justified the developer shall install it at their cost. 9. Provide funds in escrow to the Town of Oro Valley for the hospital and Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 3 share of the future intersection improvements for Tangerine Road and Innovation Park Drive. Paul Kappleman, representing the Northwest Medical Center—Oro Valley, gave an overview of the services the proposed hospital would offer. Brad Lipsey of Littlejohn Engineering presented the site access portion of the development plan, as well as landscaping. Steve Delaney of the Gould-Turner Group described the architectural details of the project. Bob Conant noted that the finished grade of the hospital would be 12-15 feet lower than Tangerine Road, thus reducing the impact on the surrounding neighbors' views. He also mentioned that the development was overparked according to the zoning code, and that the Heli- stop would have no fueling or maintenance facilities. Craig Civalier removed staff conditions 6, 7 and 9. He informed the Board that he had received the drainage report and revised traffic report, and that all parties had reached agreement regarding condition 9. Vice Chair Mager inquired about the improvements to Tangerine Road and ADOT's plans for their project. Mr. Civalier responded that the improvements would take place in two phases: F:\Minutes\DRB12003\6-10-03 minutes.doc Approved 7/8/03 3 6/10/2003 Development Review Board Minutes Page 4 1) Interm improvements will include the addition of an eastbound left turn lane and a westbound right turn lane with a temporary traffic signal 2) ADOT's Tangerine Road Improvement Project will widen Tangerine Road to a four lane divided highway, with two westbound lanes, two eastbound lanes and a 46 foot landscaped median. The intersection improvements at Innovation Park Drive will include dual left turn lanes in all directions and a permanent traffic signal. Additionally, Mr. Civalier reported that the elevation of Tangerine Road will not be raised. The existing two lanes will become the westbound lanes of the widened Tangerine Road. He further informed the Board that Innovation Park Drive will be completed north of Tangerine Road to Ventana Medical Systems. It will be a four lane divided highway except from Tangerine Road to the main hospital entrance. In this location, it will be a six lane divided highway. Member Reddin asked if there had been a study concluded regarding the project's lighting. Bob Conant answered that compliance with the lighting code requirements for dark skies will be addressed upon building permit review. Chairman Vogelsberg opened the meeting to public comment for Agenda Item 1. Bill Adler disapproved of the development plan's parking arrangement; he felt that it would be improved if the lanes were one-way, the spaces were angled, and the aisles were perpendicular to the buildings. He added that some underground parking for the medical offices would be beneficial, as it would reduce walking distance, improve security, and avoid noise and light pollution. In addition, he noted that no view corridor analysis had been completed for Tangerine, and voiced concern for the future residents who will live to the west of the project. Chairman Vogelsberg closed the meeting to public comment for Agenda Item 1. Bob Conant detailed the need for increased parking: shifts overlap, requiring additional employee parking, and visitor and outpatient parking were optimized. Member Weatherford cited the parking code as saying that angled parking is more desirable, and questioned why it was not utilized in this development plan. Paul Kappleman responded that many patients arrive in a stressed condition, and one-way angled parking creates confusion and a safety hazard for them. Member Weatherford replied that guide signage may reduce confusion, and that non-angled two-way parking caused problems with pedestrians and getting in and out of the spaces. Paul Kappleman stated that most of the parking problems that Northwest Community Hospital dealt with involved the one-way angled parking spaces. Vice Chair Mager questioned how often the Heli-stop would be used. It was answered approximately 1-2 times per week. She also inquired about how many jobs the hospital would be creating; the response was 300 to start with, not including physicians, with more added as the facilities expanded. Member Weatherford reopened the question raised by Bill Adler of the view impact of future residents. Bob Conant responded that the surrounding land uses are mainly commercial/industrial or no-build areas, with little future residential development on the same grade as the hospital. F:\Minutes\DRB\2003\6-10-03 minutes.doc Approved 7/8/03 4 6/10/2003 Development Review Board Minutes Page 5 Member Caswell inquired if the temporary trailers would be surrounded by a wall or fencing. The response was that it would be surrounded by security fencing. Similarly, she asked if any plants would be added, which was answered affirmatively. Member Weatherford reiterated his position relating to the benefits of one-way angled parking. MOTION: Vice Chair Mager moved to recommend approval of O V 12-03-05 Development Plan subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit A, deleting conditions 6, 7, and 9. Member Reddin seconded the motion. Motion carried 6-0. 2. OV12-03-05, LITTLEJOHN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, REPRESENTING NORTHWEST MEDICAL CENTER — ORO VALLEY REQUESTS APPROVAL OF THE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR A 96 BED HOSPITAL AND ASSOCIATED USES INCLUDING A 60,000 SQUARE FOOT MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TANGERINE ROAD AND INNOVATION PARK DRIVE, PARCEL 223-020-23A Robert Conant introduced the staff report into the record. Staff recommended that the DRB approve the Northwest Medical Center — Oro Valley Landscape Plan, subject to the condition listed in Exhibit A. Staff Condition: 1. Staff, applicant and the salvage company, at the time a plant salvage company has been hired, shall field verify all plants to be salvaged. Member Caswell corrected the native plant list to read "deergrass" instead of"beargrass". Chairman Vogelsberg opened the meeting to public comment for Agenda Item 2. Bill Adler discouraged the use of trees in parking lots, as they may interfere with signage and people exiting their vehicles. He suggested adding balconies (possibly false) to many of the rooms to add architectural detail and provide space for planter boxes. He opposes the use of turf, which in his opinion sends a false message that the Town has vast water resources. He reiterated that the parking spaces should be positioned perpendicularly to the buildings with walking aisles added for safety. Lastly, he recommended the use of ironwoods in the entry way to the hospital. Chairman Vogelsberg closed the meeting to public comment for Agenda Item 2. It was noted that turf was not part of the Landscape Plan. F:\Minutes\DRB\2003\6-10-03 minutes.doe Approved 7/8/03 5 6/10/2003 Development Review Board Minutes Page 6 MOTION: Member Feinberg moved to approve OV12-03-05 Landscape Plan subject to the condition listed in Exhibit A. Member Caswell seconded the motion. Motion carried 6-0. 3. OV13-03-20, GOULD-TURNER GROUP ARCHITECTS, REPRESENTING NORTHWEST MEDICAL CENTER — ORO VALLEY REQUESTS ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A 96 BED HOSPITAL AND 60,000 SQUARE FOOT MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TANGERINE ROAD AND INNOVATION PARK DRIVE, PARCEL 223-020-23A Robert Conant introduced the staff report into the record. Staff recommended that DRB approve the architecture for Northwest Medical Center — Oro Valley subject to the condition listed in Exhibit A. Staff Condition: 1. All roof mount mechanical equipment including vents and stacks shall be screened by the parapet wall. Chairman Vogelsberg opened the meeting to public comment for Agenda Item 3. Bill Adler noted that a semi-circular shape to the building would have improved panoramic views of the mountains. Jim Arnold, Chairman of the Northwest Hospital Advisory Board, described the community input given to the project. He mentioned that lighting was of particular concern to most residents. He noted that, though citizens want as little lighting as possible in the parking areas, they want sufficient lighting to find their vehicles and to see where they're going. He reported to the Board that little or no disapproval of the architecture was voiced during the community forums. Chairman Vogelsberg closed the meeting to public comment for Agenda Item 3. Member Caswell suggested adding texture to the roof to improve patient views. Member Feinberg asked if it would be possible to lower the height of the building, and inquired why the fourth floor towers were added. Paul Kappleman responded that the hospital was designed in a T shape, with the main nursing units centrally located in the second, third and fourth floors and sub-stations positioned at the ends. He reported that studies had proven the efficiency of this design, as it kept nurses closer to patients and visitors. All the outpatient and ancillary services would be located on the first floor. MOTION: Member Reddin moved to approve OV13-03-20 Architecture Plan with the condition listed in Exhibit A. Member Weatherford seconded the motion. Motion carried 6-0. F:\Minutes\DRB\2003\6-10-03 minutes.doe Approved 7/8/03 6 6/10/2003 Development Review Board Minutes Page 7 4. OV3-03-01, TERRITORIAL SIGN COMPANY, REPRESENTING NORTHWEST MEDICAL CENTER OF ORO VALLEY REQUESTS APPROVAL FOR A PAD EXEMPTION FROM THE RANCHO VISTOSO SIGN GUIDELINES AND TO BE REGULATED UNDER THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED (OVZCR), CHAPTER 12, SIGNS, SITE IS LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TANGERINE ROAD AND INNOVATION PARK DRIVE,PARCEL #223-02-023A. Bayer Vella introduced the staff report into the record. Staff recommended that DRB recommend that the Town Council approve the PAD Exemption from the Rancho Vistoso Sign System Guidelines. Mr. Vella stated that staff supports the exemption because the Rancho Vistoso Sign System Guidelines do not provide for categories such as hospitals, whereas the Oro Valley Zoning Code does. He noted that once a Comprehensive Sign Package was put together, it would be brought before the Development Review Board and Town Council for review. He added that the DRB was only voting now on which process would be used to review the sign package. Chairman Vogelsberg opened the meeting to public comment for Agenda Item 4. As no one wished to speak, he closed the meeting to public comment. MOTION: Member Caswell moved to recommend approval of OV3-03-01 PAD Exemption. Member Feinberg seconded the motion. Motion carried 6-0. 5. OV12-03-08, WLB GROUP, REPRESENTING THE PLAZA COMPANIES, REQUEST APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT FOR A SALES OFFICE, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD - JUST SOUTH OF VISTOSO HIGHLANDS DRIVE WITHIN RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 5 PARCEL A,PARCEL 219-216-270 Robert Conant introduced the staff report into the record. Staff recommended that DRB recommend that the Town Council approve the Development Plan for a Sales and Marketing Office located in Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 5 Parcel A, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit A. Staff Conditions: 1. All signage shall be in compliance with the Rancho Vistoso PAD Sign Guidelines. 2. The temporary Sales and Marketing Office shall not exceed two years in duration. 3. The Closure Calculations shall be coordinated between the title report and boundary map on sheet 1 and the site view on sheet 2. 4. Clearly indicate existing all existing and proposed easements on and adjacent to the tract and give dimensions, purpose, and recording data of existing easements per schedule B of the title report. F:\Minutes\DRB\2003\6-10-03 minutes.doc Approved 7/8/03 7 6/10/2003 Development Review Board Minutes Page 8 Steve Oliverio of the WLB Group informed the Board that the sales office would be located 130 feet from the road, and that there would be 24 parking spaces. Member Caswell inquired as to the appearance of the temporary trailer. The response was that they intended to improve the trailer's appearance with exterior treatments and landscaping. Member Feinberg questioned how long the temporary sales office would be at this location. Steve Oliverio answered that the code allowed a maximum of two years, which they would comply with. Chairman Vogelsberg opened the meeting to public comment for Agenda Item 5. Marcia Kraus asked how far south of West Vistoso Highlands Drive the sales office would be located, with the answer being well over 1000 feet. Chairman Vogelsberg closed the meeting to public comment for Agenda Item 5. Member Reddin questioned if it was proper to have a sales office approved prior to the approval of a development plan. Bayer Vella stated that they were two separate applications requiring separate review and approval. MOTION: Member Feinberg moved to recommend approval of OV 12-03-08 Development for a Sales Office subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit A. Member Weatherford seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-1 (Caswell opposed). 6. OV12-03-08, WLB GROUP, REPRESENTING THE PLAZA COMPANIES, REQUESTS APPROVAL OF A LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR A SALES OFFICE: LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD - JUST SOUTH OF VISTOSO HIGHLANDS DRIVE WITHIN RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 5 PARCEL A,PARCEL 219-216-700 Bob Conant introduced the staff report into the record. Staff recommended that the DRB approve the Landscape Plan for the Sales and Marketing Office. Chairman Vogelsberg inquired if the irrigation system could be retrofitted to use reclaimed water. Steve Oliverio responded that, though the WLB Group is working with staff to bring reclaimed water to the area, it would likely be several years in the future before this goal was reached. The sales office would be removed after a maximum of two years. Member Caswell asked if the landscaping would be reviewed by the Rancho Vistoso Homeowners Association, which was answered affirmatively. F:\Minutes\DRB\2003\6-10-03 minutes.doc Approved 7/8/03 8 . • 6/10/2003 Development Review Board Minutes Page 9 Member Feinberg encouraged the applicant to make the site visually pleasing for the surrounding residents. Chairman Vogelsberg opened the meeting to public comment for Agenda Item 6. As no one wished to speak, he closed the meeting to public comment. MOTION: Member Weatherford moved to approve OV12-03-08 Landscape Plan. Member Reddin seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-1 (Caswell opposed). 7. OV13-03-022, DUCATI DEVELOPMENT REQUESTS ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL OF A MODEL HOME, NUMBER 2293, FOR USE WITHIN RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 10 PARCEL M - SUNSET RIDGE II SUBDIVISION, LOCATED NORTH OF MOORE ROAD, SOUTH OF WOODSHADE AND WEST OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD Bayer Vella introduced the staff report into the record. Staff recommended architectural approval for the proposed model home with the conditions listed in Exhibit A. Staff Conditions: 1. A wall to provide visual screening and noise mitigation shall enclose all ground-mounted mechanical equipment. 2. Any vents and chimneys must terminate per manufacturer listing and are subject to review by Planning and Zoning and the Town Building Official. 3. All windows shall utilize pop-outs or be recessed on all sides, except under porches. 4. Place the same porte cache design (wooden trellis) found in many of the existing homes over the entire front of the house- minus the garage area. 5. Make this new front porch flush with the front edge of the garage 6. Remove the existing covered front entry and corresponding gable. 7. Three canales must be added over the garage—as found with other homes. 8. A final design that includes items 3 -7 above must be certified complete by staff prior to application for a building permit. Bayer Vella reported that there were two design guidelines under issue: 1) the 22 foot extension of the garage, and 2) compatibility with the existing homes in the neighborhood. Mr. Vella presented a sampling of exterior views of homes within the development. In contrast to the existing homes, which all have garages that are recessed to the backs of the lots, the proposed model offered a standard garage dominant design. Additionally, a covered entry (porte catche) is a dominant design feature of the subdivision, but does not exist as part of the proposed model. The applicant was not in attendance to answer questions. Several Board members voiced that the proposed model seemed too different to be part of the existing neighborhood. F:\Minutes\DRB\2003\6-10-03 minutes.doc Approved 7/8/03 9 6/10/2003 Development Review Board Minutes Page 10 Vice Chair Mager inquired if the Board should continue the item to give the applicant a chance to make changes. It was Member Weatherford's opinion that the proposed model could not be modified sufficiently, and that a new plan should be submitted. Member Feinberg felt that the applicant had not made a big effort to fit in with the design of the subdivision. Chairman Vogelsberg believed that it would be a disservice to the existing neighborhood to approve the model. Chairman Vogelsberg opened the meeting to public comment for Agenda Item 7. As no one wished to speak, he closed the meeting to public comment. MOTION: Member Reddin moved to deny OV13-03-022 Architecture Approval of a Model Home Plan, stating that the architecture was not in harmony with the surrounding neighborhood. Member Weatherford seconded the motion. Motion carried 6-0. Chairman Vogelsberg called attention to the fact that Geoff Masters had submitted a blue speaker card for Call to the Audience, which was overlooked. The chairman asked if he wished to speak at this point, but he was no longer in attendance. 8. RECOGNITION OF ACHIEVEMENT FOR DRB MEMBERS WITH TERMS EXPIRING DRB Member, Nancy Mager, was recognized for her service. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Vice Chair Mager moved to adjourn the June 10, 2003 Development Review Board Meeting at 7:50 pm. Member Feinberg seconded the motion. Motion carried 6-0. Respectfully submitted by, Recording Secretary, Kristina Curry F:\Minutes\DRB\2003\6-10-03 minutes.doc Approved 7/8/03 10 JPxLEY qRi� TOWN OF ORO VALLEY O, :o� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning and Zoning • Building Safety -4 to, 11000 N.La Canada Drive,Oro Valley,AZ 85737•(520)229-4800•Fax(520)742-1022 Oro Valley Public Library - A, 1305 W.Naranja Drive,Oro Valley,AZ 85737• (520)229-5300•Fax(520)229-5319 F. Parks and Recreation OUNDED\ 680 W.Calle Concordia,Oro Valley,AZ 85737•(520)229-5050•Fax(520)797-2202 June 11,2003 Mr. Robert Brack A.F. Sterling 3573 E. Sunrise, Suite 209 Tucson,AZ 85718 FAX: 520.577-0634 RE: OV13-03-11 Town of Oro Valley Development Review Board approval of Architectural Design of Model Home Number 3333 for the Vistoso Gateway subdivision(Parcel Nos. 219-510-030,040, 050 and 060). Dear Mr.Brack: At their regular meeting of June 10,2003,the Development Review Board unanimously(6-0)approved the architecture for OV13-03-11,per the revised plans received by the Town on May 5,2003,for Model Home Number 3333 to be built within the Vistoso Gateway subdivision located on the northwest corner of Tangerine Road and Reflection Ridge Drive. The Development Review Board approved the revised plans,subject to the following conditions: 1. The setbacks for the houses shall vary so that no two units are equally aligned. 2. The same elevation and floor plan shall not be repeated without at least a three lot separation. 3. All roof mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened from view and the color of roofing materials will blend in with the landscape. 4. Any vents and chimneys must terminate per manufacturer listing and are subject to review by Planning and Zoning and the Town Building Official. A cap must be placed over the spark arrestor. Please present this letter when you make your submittal for a building permit. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 229-4814 or email me at smontana@orovalley.net. Sincerely, Susana Montana Planner II C: Dee Widero,Shirley Gay,TOV F:\OV\OV 13\2003\13-03-11\Correspondence\DRB Action Letter.doc www.townoforovalley.com 0 V 1.. .-°3- It JPo-EY 4,9, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY oho �02 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT rr 0 !► Planning and Zoning • Building Safety It IP 11000 N.La Canada Drive,Oro Valley,AZ 85737•(520)229-4800•Fax(520)742-1022 1 10. 4 ► Oro Valley Public Library ♦ ; 1305 W.Naranja Drive,Oro Valley,AZ 85737• (520)229-5300•Fax(520)229-5319 A --- A �A Parks and Recreation °UN D ED\ 680 W.Calle Concordia,Oro Valley,AZ 85737•(520)229-5050•Fax(520)797-2202 June 17, 2003 Mr. Robert Brack A.F. Sterling 3573 E. Sunrise, Suite 209 Tucson, AZ 85718 FAX 520-577-0634 RE: Vistoso Gateway Dear Mr. Brack, Due to concerns about outdoor lighting we are requesting additional information about your model home plans. Please submit catalog cuts by manufacturers (cut sheets) for the lights that will be installed on the exterior of each home. The cut sheets contain a picture and details about each light fixture. These cut sheets will help us determine if the outdoor lighting is in compliance with the Town of Oro Valley's lighting code. By reviewing these cut sheets prior to installation we can prevent future complaints about the lighting. Below is a section of our code to help you with you lighting selections. Sec. 13-105 Lighting A. The light emitting element and reflecting device of all lighting or illumination units shall be hooded or shielded so that it is not visible from any adjacent lot or real property. B. Lights or illuminating units shall not direct light, either directly or through a reflecting device, upon an adjacent real property. Please submit the cut sheets to the Zoning Department prior to construction of your models. You may submit the cut sheets by mail, email, fax or in person. If you have any questions please feel free to call. Please include your model identification numbers on the cut sheets. Thank you for you assistance, /i40-t--- Patty Hayes Town of Oro Valley Planning and Zoning Phone 520-229-4819 Fax 520-742-1022 phayes(a orovalley.net www.townoforovalley.com