The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutOV130318 JPLLEYAR/ O �oy i i f� grit outvDED,9. Planning &Zoning Division 11000 N. La Canada Drive, Oro Valley AZ 85737 Phone: (520) 229-4800 Fax: (520) 742-1022 www.townoforovalley.com APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROJECT ARCHITECTURE DATE: q /8"43 OV CASE NO.: (office use only PROJECT NAME : 00/4LCs SUBDIVISION filig c -n.Y 1" //46 LOT# 7 /0. ///3 LOCATION/ADDRESS: BA 4 o"s%'ve, S/y14.< ZONING PARCEL NUMBER: LOT SIZE MODEL NAMES OR NUMBERS C MiP4/ O2 4 / AM i9iii/? 2 Siri,64771 e pL, ,t) APPLICANT: '73A o c It c a //_s ADDRESS: �D/ && /7-Za y /z YO AJ oR LA 6A,�/,9 0, (t //_ el PHONE NO.: 23 7-‘J F -Q3--75403 FAX NO.: 243 - 75-67 PROPERTY OWNER: li n/"LW;c t /, 'ii,I' wA, ,D Sib A dog Aawks- f ADDRESS: _S".e 7 7Q l/.4s---A/ft.� ,A) PHONE NO.: FAX NO: .-. ....:,v. .,.:.,✓meµ. .=:..a•_....m+...... ^..... .,...:_r"'"" ,., +•...l..w.... ..._........ :..:.......w',...s..+b:. ... .t.,».. ,.,e`. ,. "+ ...,ua +•�.. •.•> ......ar M.rs ... PROJECT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: .ems/- ADDRESS: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW B;11) RING DATE: SIGNATURE: R�� DATE: 11 !o3 Submittal Requirements: $150.00 Fee ONE COPY OF 24X36 SCALED ELEVATIONS Fifteen copies of the following: Dimensioned Elevations of all four sides of all buildings(11"x 17"format) Commercial projects require color drawings or photographs of elevations(81/2"x 11"format) List square footage of buildings Site Plan(11"x 17"format) Color chips of body,trim and roof tiles(8 1/2"by 11"format) Applications will not be accepted without all required materials. SUBMITTALS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AT LEAST 18 CALENDAR DAYS IN ADVANCE OF THE DESIRED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD HEARING DATE. ALL SUBMITTALS ARE DUE AT NOON. F:IAdmin PZIFORMSIShannon Project Subdivision Development HandoutlDRBPROJARCHAPP.doc TOWN OF ORO VALLEY STAFF REPORT TO THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING DATE: May 13, 2003 TO: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD FROM: Robert Conant, Planner II SUBJECT: OV13-03-18, BROCK QUALLS REQUESTS ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A MODEL HOME, LOTS 7, 10, 11 AND 13 FAIRWAY VILLAGE WITHIN THE EL CONQUISTADOR COUNTRY CLUB PAD, PARCELS 224-240-440, 224-240-470, 224- 240-480 AND 224-240-500 BACKGROUND: The El Conquistador Country Club PAD was adopted by Town Council in November 1983 and the Plat for Fairway Village was recorded in October 1987. The area is zoned PAD. The lots contain land areas as follows: Lot 7 8,492 square feet Lot 10 7,077 square feet Lot 11 6,936 square feet Lot 13 7,061 square feet The lot, including the entire subdivision was mass graded at the time the map was recorded (1987). The lots listed above are only remaining vacant lots within this subdivision. The following setbacks are applicable: Front: 20-feet from the street Side: 5-feet with 10-feeet between structures Rear: The PAD gives no guidance or requirements for the rear setback. SUMMARY: The applicant Brock Qualls proposes to construct this model home on Lots 7, 10, 11, and 13 of Fairway Village. The models will be located along Broadstone Drive and will be two stories in height. The height of the house from finished grade will be 27'-6.5", which is below the maximum height of 38-feet allowed by the El Conquistador Country Club PAD. The house can be characterized as being in the Queen Anne cottage style, which is similar to the surrounding homes in the neighborhood. The following describes each of the elevations: Front: This elevation consists of the garage, front entry and a bay window element. The garage extends beyond the house by about two feet and is a front on three car garage, typical of the neighborhood. The second story is above the garage with an extended dormer, with a gabled roof. The glazing within the dormer is a pair of French doors which create a balcony when opened. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT Page 2 Rear: This elevation consists of a covered patio within the roof line of the house. The elevation also has a dormer matching the one in the front. Right Side: The elevation has glazing in the living room and kitchen which take up this side of the house. A single French door leads from the Master Bedroom to the covered patio. Left Side: The elevation has glazing in the Master Bathroom and Bedroom 2, there is no glazing in the garage which makes up the remainder of this elevation of the house. The roof material is clay barrel tile and the color palette is attached for review. GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE: The model complies with the General Plan Design Elements. In particular all four sides are treated comprehensively and the model is similar to the surrounding environment. ZONING COMPLIANCE: The model complies with the zoning setbacks and building height as set forth in the El Conquistador Country Club PAD and the OVZCR Design Guidelines. PUBLIC PRESENTATION: As established in Resolution (R) 98-31, "all presentations before Boards, Commissions and Council" must be formatted to be shown on the Town's projection system or overhead system. A presentation must be designed to insure that the audience, staff and voting body can view the graphics. Examples of acceptable computer formats are Power Point, Arc View, videotape, presentation boards and/or overhead transparences. This item will be placed on the consent agenda. If the Development Review Board moves this item to the regular agenda, the applicant must be prepared to provide a presentation. The applicant is responsible for the development, presentation and coordination of all presentation materials. If an applicant does not conform to the aforementioned resolution, the item may be continued due to non-compliance. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Development Review approve the architecture for Lots 7, 10, 11 and 13 Fairway Village, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit A. SUGGESTED MOTION: The DRB may wish to consider the following suggested motion: I move to approve OV13-03-18, Model Home, lots 7, 10, 11 and13 Fairway Village, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit A, attached herewith. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT Page 3 Attachments: 1. Exhibit A 2. Elevations 3. Color Palette Contact: Brock Qualls Fax 293-8567 Planning and Zoning Administrator EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OV13-03-18 1. A cap must be placed over the spark arrestors; however, all vents and chimneys must terminate per appliance manufacturer listings. The fixture is subject to review by Planning and Zoning and the Town Building Official. 2. No two models with the same color scheme shall be placed next to each other. 96' 1 1/8" r A .... co r-- r A \ 11\ r.i. \ 63'7" .... \\„, //' (-/ iiii:iiiio‘u,,' MN Miiii MI ll 1 I __--._Id I-0-11--1 I k, CV 1 -ill 111110111'11111 iiiilii iiiI11111311IIM1111111111111110111 inilitigi9,1 i II iliriil 111111 111"'11 iiigil';'131.111:',11i111,,, 1:421111:011111,1M11111111011 III NMI Ellli ill'ililliiiiiiig iiiIiIIIII ill III'Illi 1 1m- .T4 -'I-4I- ,-,_ 0 \\•-th.ii cr) I - ,.II 1111111111111111 II F N—• . ffi ----,5---' ----,---- -,,,--i---. .... , Ale 17 ill, ..„.,,, - 1,11111111111111111111111111111111''' ---;i4 11,11 mum,iiiNiHniiliticruirliiiikilllitiontimil,l, .1,4;11illi,,,,illigui',111,211.1ill 11.191111in RI M 1 itil!l!',Iiillql El : --,,, , ..., t s.0.0Z co F.- !.... 98' 11 7/8" - ) A /r A • ♦ UNSUBDIVIDED """ .■�... .3rALE i•=40. P. ozziacir -- 5s•08'5 1 /'E ¢s7ere' Il „1�p � � 711.1. t 7/�� 5�' 05�0' -et7lDI' liZ /13 1� 7 8 9 * Nztr *- * 7/off 1�` O 01- 1 A 12 �'r / 7 / gY' hP !*4. I ik",6 AI, 6901 evr ,- t1 1 it s7/ t ii ,ors _ —u7_�� :O. - 8R ADSTONE Dl-" -- ---- -- -- C-O-"Z „ RIVE 1r6 *70n- q 1 _ coAaeo v o4 •/34• _ _ * :i 3-p... c��` c f4 - cs, Cr, Ced cor _,i _______ �.-,.._-CO k * --L'it — . 3r t I,--cis- -CEO-a lI 59 k 58 k 60 A � 57 k 0 45 4 44 //0,64 � * * 12 /arm / /s./5. Io `.1 h t. / -..t v AN /(,) b 11 AL,4004) . k -4\viiiiiiik 0. 73 ot 71,.ois -r__ ti w '1?Ale MX' 19 M. 441 ��Ao' A/5041f K E / 0 er 1:\,.A. ./ ' Nib Wes' Aar: \ ,, ii li.. 56 I- — * . A. et' N A.a i triec;5 4 46/' /1,/7.0.4riorre \ 1 7\c \ -lit, -iit/A 4,), Ix_ Moo' \ / �o I 48 . 4 IC \ \''cry..— tfi 5Q+ D�.t1 / �`� 6t69' moo. \ C'/ - 1° O , A P — 50 . 6r9•56• e-w 1 1 t0'° , 0 '/�./c/fir .11 I ' i ;v. t �� 52 51 Bw ..41 � et tJ5/c, 4/cPItit Cps •21 UIVSt)E3DIVI o I ESV'. T S 'l� p S o¢6t•� _ A v Rix/4-y- k://A76-., ' . -1•,,g- , ors `� 4 ti, SEE SHEET 4 FOR CURVE DATA LEGENQ CA' COMMON AREA O NEW SURVEY MONUMENTIN COMPLIANCE WITH CERTIFICATION SHOWN ON SHEET ONE 4u/xr 6' WILILY X PEDESTRIAN REFUGE EASEMENT C 7 5E+. CUR TALE ''� ' [_1 10' X 10' ELECTRIC EASEMENT I,1400ip , ; �� t C ELECTRIC PEDESTAL EASEMENT (SEE DETAIL• THIS SHEET) ' ' ' FRONT OF LOT (FOR ADDRESSING PURPOSES) ' '►b ''‘'\ i''' , '56'-0• / ~ 13'-0. 17'-6' 2'-6" d / A2'-Or 21'-e" 2'-0'f `�GENERAL NOTES ` Le.,11r 3'-0' 6'-EA* 3'-0• 5'-0" e'-0" 5'-9' 7'-6' e'-0' 2'—Y' EP-0' —3' Iz CO 1 ALL CO11s1xucnoN ro BE N ACCORDANCE WTH THE 200E 1JLG 13 , /I AM)LOCAL CODES AND MMENOIE)ITS p..t , • 2 ORAMNGS AtE NOT ro BE scuID FOR IFGRIIATHON PURPOSES C " M • 1 3 All MPoTTEN DW9ONS ME TO BE LERFIED N THE FE1D 'ea Z.. I E DISCREPANCIES TO BE REPORTED TO T.J.BEDNM&CO. NJ O O • I 10' REAR PORCH I NJ u N I 4 ESCAPE&RESCUE WIDOWS SHALL HALE A MN PET CLEAR OPE?IABIEE / o AREA OF 5.7 SO FT -MR WDTH••20• -MN HEGHT••24" M R I I -MAX WIDOW SRL I EYi1T•44" /' ! 1D 5 1•STYRO 3 STUCCO SYSTEM ON CAROM 0 -._-. I I GYP M) 1/2"TAPE 6 TEXTURED-1/T MR AT TUB 6 SHOWERS 7 TT]�P. / 1 LXIER OF S T1PE'X AT GARAGE MALLS C01601 WTN RESIDENCE. " \� / GARAGE BEANTIN�NALLS AUO GARAGE CELNG INSTALLED N/LONG Ate, e - �I \ ♦ i , /r 2�XO• Bx 5°XG _. ct DIIL APPLED PERP.TD FRAYNG 1El�FiS .,t, 'i�:.�r :r / ! 7 INSULATION WALLS R-12 BAITS -C1GS R-36 / e AWN WIDOWS Mc SLOG DOORS -DOERS ro BE TEMP GLASS 4 TEMP s-sHf j Q o PROLDE-DBL NSUL CLASS w/SCREENS I �� I \ . Y I SAFETY GLAZING REO'D FOR ALL WIDON6 MITHN A 24'MC CF ETHER a X I i TEMP. I b1€RTTCAL EDGE OF A DOOR MO N SHOVER/BATH 0CLOSURES c ((�� A N \ 10 ALL*BOLE GLAZING 10 BE PER SECTION R613 C 10 „ C IAA.RAM ... .il:t� �'......,. ". •; �, f3 ♦ _ ° II CORRAL CONTRACTOR To LERFY ALL COF0flCRS PRIOR 0 BODING i I �~ 1r-0'x 1W� r I B 6x SGD I AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANCES N DRS PLAN TD THE DRAFTSMAN. 1 ;1 STEP W MA OOY \ / i 12 MOOD FRIED ffARNG WALLS PER RC 602 S1.t TABLES 60L3(5) -* _ -.. __4 SEO ARs 04OF :....-.. •• Y I EXTETODR WALLS 2x8 c4•aG.NT.BEARING WALLS 7x4/Q4'0.� �r '..-�, i TOP 7'-0' w x>r-f `� I 13 HEADERS SIZED PER RC 5025(1)AND 5025(2) z.,_ / r SPRING 6'-6' -RxC i 14 ALL W OD FRAMNG MEMBERS 10 BE GRADE STAMPED ul i • i /� / t i + p{ + /// �OPT•L SEG.ARCH N \`\ i i 1. ® �b00R I TOP AT 8'-0" a ♦ I �p0 111 i / i `� i I in �. N SPRING AT 7'-4• ♦ • I . I \ I / 0 ELEV."A"ONLY • • I *Dr x* ! i / r j �' ll g FMY ROOM \I 2.-3" I Irlifi ■ �IX701A a ,/ .• i 1t T a 1N� iMOP / L.L. I ; CLCCET 1<-C x W-0r // 1 I • \ i 1 1. I O 70 IF ZERO CLEARANCE F.P. - I I Ij x 1* PER CHAPT. 10 INSTALL ii---- 111111 q . , ' i PER IJFG.SPECS.AND1 ! ( ..�ne.� CURRENT ICBO FtEPORf SEE.ARCH TOP AT 6.-0" /� 7 a� 3 i m RES SPRING AT 7'-4" �4- I L I N R&S 11.1 ill ! I DV I • i N I ��_ ~ I I i MI .I I o t C i 0 I i Y I vicr x ir-t x . I . '1;� i '• ; 0 10' .I qr t i I i Y\ i �r C 165 RISERS O 7-1/2" 1, ', 11'-8' b 1 .. \ 1S TREADS O 11• 'I{-l( I • _ I A '� rre rc .> AN/1 i . TN te .„,,. ', /� OME ROOM i° q (---; _ I. l It IllinaI M S I SO ir 111-7'x ef-I L — ;l,�--= 2.6 1 LAL CR1' \ WINO ROOM 1 'ri ( `M 3 ♦ 0-0" 'PCP I ' El ___. SOLID COPE . .-r.! ♦ -� i E' — 2 "�18'H. PLATFORM SELF CLOSING DOOR ;♦; i \, • 1 �i I W/SHT YTL TOP / ;r�- L 1 i. 4J''„ '• - / . „ • • • • 1) / - / 7 1 • • 'WHEEL 3° 7/'// \ ♦♦ : `� • _ 1 I 1 \ / e� r , ti 0 , \ ♦. . ;Si, 1 %. 0. ' o ir-t" a TEIAP.—•-••. s ...„,.. '... 1 \ •••••" W 'i 0 GARAGE ,. -,,--- . '4* '-C / I „ j _ �� \ I 1 4 sear x tor. //MP I \ r 11-7 x 10•-11' • 1 13'-0" 4.-(1. 4'-r ♦ • UAW ROOM / \ j _ •`-.4 OE • , . dk\ /4 .. I? . r a .— catEl / I �A y_ 1 4 `� pl I` 1 /i 16°8°GAR DR. t \ 3°5°XO W bOm 1 ARCH ._.—..._. __..__....-.._J 1 _ _ i'-0•� e'-0• 12""1e" 16'-0" -- �2•-D, 3'-0'` 5'-6" / 5'-O' / 7'-0" / 5'-D" / AREA TABULATION / 11'-0" f 19'-8' / 8'-6- / 17'-0" —� FIRST FLOOR 2281 SQ. FT. SECOND FLOOR 1056 SQ. FT. 30.-8' 25'-8" 3-CAR GARAGE 684 SQ. FT. 0 / FRONT PORCH 70 SQ. FT. 58'-0' REAR PORCH 240 SQ. FT. / TOTAL UNDER ROOF 4331 SO.FT. FLOOR PLAN VERIFY LATEST ISSUE DATE BEFORE USING FIELD COPY ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN 1/Sra1'-0. Assoc DATE) ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2000 LR.C. FLP r . ,,._ ,„ , co c Q Q M -i 4r Z,. cmu O N m .7- --Ills PI 9 ii il 0, MI 0 111 : . \—•-• CONC. MISSION TLE P.e. t ON 3041 FELT-TYP. 3 PER MFG.SPEC'SThi I�' / N II � 111 ( , ii , O ! I il , ii n , �0�� Oi' t iU _ , Ea O ROfT HFVA71ON OFRONT ELEVA110N w•UV' VC.*r 7 7\%) W \ , • 0 CE EXTERIOR FINISH TO BE A WESTERNI .. ONE-COAT STUCCO SYUItS (OR ED.) PER CURRENT ICBO REPORT AND MFG.INSTRUCTIONAL DATA. (TYP) W/2 LAYERS OF TYPE 'D'PAPER AND WEEP SCREEDS(TYP) OEM eas....kr D °LEFT,. ELEVATION ag.". EAR ELEVATION .,..ELEVATION tr 0 ELEVATIONS 2 CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN 1/as r�' ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2000 LR.C. ELEV pMEll imiu hCbg 11 all IMO Swiss Coffee Oyster SP 836 Baja White SP Desert Star Phoenix Villa SP 14 SP 2750 SP 2340 SP74 Cocoa DE3113 Cool Night IF1L1w jr• MINUTES OF THE ORO VALLEY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING TUESDAY, MAY 13, 2003 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11,000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE REGULAR MEETING CALL TO ORDER: 6:01 p.m. PRESENT: Jim Vogelsberg, Chair Nancy Mager, Vice Chair Richard Feinberg, Member Al Kunisch, Member Jeff Weatherford, Member Mary Caswell, Member ALSO PRESENT: Bryant Nodine, Planning & Zoning Administrator Craig Civalier, Development Review Division Manager Mark Langlitz, Town Attorney David Ronquillo, Planner I Bob Conant, Planner II Raul Duato, GIS Analyst Kristina Curry, Secretary II ABSENT: Clark Reddin, Member REVIEW OF APRIL 8,2003 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MINUTES Approved as corrected CONSENT AGENDA B. OV13-03-15, OWNER AND APPLICANT JON A. PETTY, REQUESTS ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL OF A CUSTOM HOME FOR A TWO STORY RESIDENCE ON LOT 47 OF NARANJA RANCH,PARCEL#224080490 The applicant has submitted architectural renderings for review. C. OV13-03-18, BROCK QUALLS REQUESTS ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A MODEL HOME, LOTS 7, 10, 11 AND 13 FAIRWAY VILLAGE WITHIN THE EL CONQUISTADOR COUNTRY CLUB PAD, PARCELS 224-240-440, 224-240-470, 224-240-480 AND 224-240-500 Architectural review of a two story model home 5/13/2003 Development Review Board Minutes Page 2 D. OV12-97-14C, REBECCA DOXTATER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, REPRESENTING LARRY J. CLICK & ASSOCIATES, REQUESTS APPROVAL OF A LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR DEVELOPMENT AREAS 2 & 3 OF THE SAN JOSE PLAZA; LOCATED '/4 MILE NORTH FROM THE INTERSECTION OF ORACLE ROAD AND EL CONQUISTADOR WAY ON THE EAST SIDE OF ORACLE ROAD, PARCEL#22431002D The applicant has submitted a landscape plan for review. MOTION: Member Kunisch pulled Consent Agenda Item A to the Regular Agenda. Member Weatherford moved to approve Consent Agenda Items B, C and D. Member Kunisch seconded the motion. Motion carried 6-0. REGULAR AGENDA A. OV13-03-17, DUCAT' HOMES REQUESTS ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL FOR A CUSTOM BUILT HOME FOR LOT 71 OF THE RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 11 (VISTOSO HIGHLANDS) SUBDIVISION LOCATED ON A CORNER LOT AT 655 W. BRIGHT CANYON DRIVE AT QUIET SPRINGS DRIVE (PARCEL NO. 219-191-630). The Applicant seeks to construct a custom home on a corner lot in the Ranch Vistoso Highlands subdivision. Member Kunisch observed an error on the staff report: the side setbacks should read 5 feet instead of 8 feet. MOTION: Member Kunisch moved to approve Consent Agenda Item A as corrected. Member Feinberg seconded the motion. Motion carried 6-0. 1. OV12-03-05, LITTLEJOHN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, REPRESENTING NORTHWEST MEDICAL CENTER — ORO VALLEY, REQUESTS AN INFORMAL REVIEW OF A DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TANGERINE ROAD AND INNOVATION PARK DRIVE, PARCEL 223-020-23A Bob Conant introduced the staff report into the record. No action was recommended or taken, as this was a presentation only. The Development Plan, Landscape Plan, and Architecture Plan will be reviewed at the June 10, 2003 DRB meeting. An overview of the project was presented by Paul Kappleman and Dave Parker. F:\Minutes\DRB\2003\5-13-03 minutes.doc Minutes approved 6-10-03 2 • 5/13/2003 Development Review Board Minutes Page 3 2. PUBLIC HEARING — OV9-02-06 PROFILE DESIGN REPRESENTING WOLFLEY/EL CONQUISTADOR, REQUESTS APPROVAL OF A GRADING EXCEPTION PER SECTION 15-501 OF THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED FOR THE SITE LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ORACLE ROAD AND EL CONQUISTADOR WAY, PARCEL 224-331-31B Craig Civalier introduced the staff report into the record. Staff recommended approval of the grading exception with the conditions listed on Exhibit A. Staff Conditions: 1. Widen El Conquistador Way to three lanes from Oracle Road to Valle del Oro 2. Construct sidewalks on the north side of El Conquistador Way and the east side of Valle del Oro 3. Install bike lanes on the north and south sides of El Conquistador Way 4. Landscaping as permitted Carl Kilgore, the architect representing Wolfley/El Conquistador, summarized the reasons for their request and listed their proposed improvements. Raul Duato showed a 3-D rendering of the site with before and after grading exception views. Citizens voicing concern or opposition included: • Roland Brescia • Alex Bellinder • Doris Robinette • Mary Erbe • Carol Perell • Bill Adler • Harold Kandetzke • Geoff Masters Issues discussed included: • Traffic concerns o Flow and access to U-turns along El Conquistador Way o Construction traffic • Blockage of views o Impact on neighboring residents by parking area wall o Height of wall once fill dirt is added o Blockage of mountain views o Downgrading of neighboring residents' quality of life • Necessity of a Grading Waiver o Questions if property is or isn't buildable o Residential requiring less grading than commercial • Zoning change and incompatibility of uses o Too close proximity of commercial to residential o Intensification of use (restaurant) F:\Minutes\DRB\2003\5-13-03 minutes.doc Minutes approved 6-10-03 3 5/13/2003 Development Review Board Minutes Page 4 Member Weatherford voiced that it may be possible to develop the property without a grading exception if it was developed as a residential use instead of a commercial use. Member Kunisch recommended that the applicant have more contact with the neighboring residences in order to satisfy their concerns. Vice Chair Mager felt that the grading exception was a precursor to a zoning change, and commented that she would not be in favor of a zoning change. Chairman Vogelsberg observed that a grading exception would need to be approved in order for a zoning change to be successful, but noted that the applicant had not submitted a development plan nor gone through the rezoning process. He stated that he did not believe that the property could not be developed as zoned without the grading exception. MOTION: Vice Chair Mager moved to deny OV9-02-06 Grading Exception. Member Caswell seconded the motion. Motion carried 6-0. 3. PUBLIC HEARING: OV12-80-03B, BRUCE CALL, REPRESENTING THE PUSCH RIDGE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY, REQUESTS APPROVAL OF A GRADING WAIVER; LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LINDA VISTA AND ORACLE ROAD, PARCEL#22510064B Craig Civalier introduced the staff report into the record. Staff recommended that the grading exception with the conditions listed on Exhibit A be approved. Staff Conditions: 1. The following conditions relate to Landscaping on the site: a. Area One—North of the proposed middle school classroom cluster Landscaping shall be provided on all graded areas and slope construction as indicated on the approved Master Landscape Plan for Pusch Ridge Christian Academy. b. Area Two — South of the proposed Art/Music/Auditorium building at the loading zone The landscape materials provided on the upper portion of the terraced slope shall be natural desert vegetation to blend with the surrounding existing vegetation. The vegetation on the lower portion of the slope shall be appropriate for the fringe of parking areas where pedestrian traffic can be expected. c. Area Three—At the southeast of the proposed Middle School baseball field. The slope terracing on the east, south and west sides of the field shall be provided with vegetation such as trees and shrubs to enhance the landscaping of the field area. F:\Minutes\DRB\2003\5-13-03 minutes.doc Minutes approved 6-10-03 4 5/13/2003 Development Review Board Minutes Page 5 2. A revised master development plan will be required if other than minimal revisions to the grading design/concept are required at the time of construction for Phase 2. Bruce Call, representing the Pusch Ridge Christian Academy, addressed the Board and answered questions. MOTION: Member Kunisch moved to approve OV12-80-03B Grading Waiver with the conditions listed in Exhibit A. Member Weatherford seconded the motion. Motion carried 6-0. 4. OV12-80-03B, BRUCE CALL, REPRESENTING THE PUSCH RIDGE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY, REQUESTS APPROVAL OF A MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO BE BUILT IN TWO PHASES; LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LINDA VISTA AND ORACLE ROAD, PARCEL #22510064B David Ronquillo introduced the staff report into the record. Staff recommended approval with the conditions in Exhibit"A". Staff Conditions: 1. A general note must be added to the development plan which includes the required building height as specified in the Private Schools and & Churches district. 2. Pusch Ridge Christian Academy must work with the Oro Water Utility and Golder Ranch Fire District to plan and construct the necessary improvements to achieve adequate fire flow. Adequate fire flow as determined by the Golder Ranch Fire District must be physically achieved prior to any building construction for Phase 2 and within two (2) years of the Development Plan approval by Town Council. 3. A Final Drainage Report shall be prepared upon the acceptance of the Improvement Plans for the project. 4. Accessible routes per ADA requirements shall be provided on the Improvement Plans. 5. During phase 2 widen Linda Vista Blvd east of Oracle Road to three lanes at the intersection to provide left turn, though and right turn lanes. 6. Reexamination of the trip generation rates of the Academy when enrollment reaches 700 students. 7. Based on condition 6 determine if Calle Concordia east and west of Oracle Road should be widened to three lanes at the intersection to provide left turn, though and right turn lanes. Member Caswell inquired how long modular buildings are allowed to be up. Bryant Nodine answered that they are allowed during construction for the purposes of handling the uses of the site until the final building is constructed. David Ronquillo stated that it was his understanding that the proposed modular buildings would be used as temporary classrooms. F:\Minutes\DRB\2003\5-13-03 minutes.doc Minutes approved 6-10-03 5 5/13/2003 Development Review Board Minutes Page 6 Chairman Vogelsberg asked what the lifespan of an approved development plan was. David Ronquillo answered that, once construction has begun, development plans do not expire. Citizen Elwood Mayberry requested fencing between the trailhead and the proposed parking area. Louise Benneckar, representing Pusch Ridge Estates HOA, expressed concerns over the modular buildings, outdoor lighting, parking lot, and storage trailers. Bill Hallinan, representing the Pusch Ridge Christian Academy, explained that the modular buildings are existing, and that possibly two more modular buildings will be added later if needed. He stated that an improved circulation route would be added during Phase One, which would improve access to the ball field. Additionally, he reported that no lighting was planned for the ball field. Member Kunisch inquired if the additional modular buildings would be the same color as the existing ones, which was answered affirmatively. Also, he asked if it would be possible to add fencing between the trailhead and the parking area. It was answered that the improved circulation route should resolve the problem, making fencing unnecessary. Chairman Vogelsberg questioned if the Development Review Board would review the architecture of the modular buildings, which was answered affirmatively. Additionally, he affirmed that any outdoor lighting added at a later date would be required to adhere to the lighting code. MOTION: Member Weatherford moved to approve OV 12-80-03B Master Development Plan with the conditions listed in Exhibit A and overflow parking allowed. Member Kunisch seconded the motion. Motion carried 6-0. 5. OV12-80-03B, TMHS ASSOCIATES, REPRESENTING THE PUSCH RIDGE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY, REQUESTS APPROVAL OF A LANDSCAPE PLAN; LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LINDA VISTA AND ORACLE ROAD, PARCEL#22510064B David Ronquillo introduced the staff report into the record. Staff recommended approval with the condition listed in Exhibit"A". Staff Condition: 1. In accordance with the OVZCR, every ninth parking space within the parking lots must have a landscaped island. Revise the plan accordingly to reflect the Master Development Plan. MOTION: Member Kunisch moved to approve OV 12-80-03B Landscape Plan with the condition listed in Exhibit A. Member Caswell seconded the motion. Motion carried 6-0. Recess: 7:38 p.m. Reconvene: 7:45 p.m. F:\Minutes\DRB\2003\5-13-03 minutes.doc Minutes approved 6-10-03 6 5/13/2003 Development Review Board Minutes Page 7 6. OV12-02-06, SEAVER-FRANKS ARCHITECTS AND EEC, REPRESENTING THE BEZTAK COMPANIES, REQUESTS APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT 138 UNITS OF APARTMENTS AND 31, 187 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LAMBERT LANE AND LA CANADA DRIVE, PARCEL 224-250- 25C Bob Conant introduced the staff reports into the record for Agenda Items 6, 7 & 8. Staff recommended that DRB recommend to Town Council approval of the Development Plan subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit A. Staff Conditions: 1. All conditions of the Grading Exception approved by Town Council on March 5, 2003 and attached hereto shall be conditions of the Development Plan. These shall be added as General Notes on the Development Plan. 2. All outdoor lighting shall be in compliance with Chapter 17 of the OVZCR except that all parking lot light standards shall not exceed eighteen (18') feet in height, and all patio lighting in building 1, 2, 9 and 10 shall be fully shielded. 3. Public Art shall be reviewed and approved by the Town Council and shall be installed prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any building on the site. 4. Note 34; list the units that will be ADA accessible. 5. First flush system maintenance; add verbiage stating method of cleaning the debris out of the basin itself. 6. The cross slope in the PAAL between buildings 6 and 9 exceeds 5%. Check elevations in this area. 7. Ensure that the scuppers are at the lowest elevation in the PAALs or parking areas so that drainage does not run down the access drive to the water well site. 8. Explain the purpose of the ADA ramps to the back of shops 2. Neither of them meets ADA standards. Check the cross slope grade of 5% in the PAAL behind shops 2. The spot elevations do not agree. 9. Label concentration point 2 and show the value of the 100-year expected flow. 10. Show the design of the landscape berm along Lambert Lane. 11. Provide a revised drainage report. Tom Tracey, representing the Beztak Companies, made a presentation. Michael Franks, of Seaver- Franks Architects, gave an overview of the project and responded to the Board's comments. Member Feinberg commented that he didn't see many changes with the new plan. He observed that,though the ends of Buildings 7 & 8 had been reduced to two stories, additional units had been added onto the building overlooking the golf course; it was his understanding that this building was to remain two stories to preserve views. Michael Franks responded that the massing of the three F:\Minutes\DRB\2003\5-13-03 minutes.doc Minutes approved 6-10-03 7 5/13/2003 Development Review Board Minutes Page 8 story buildings had been broken up per the Board's suggestion, and that the design of the architecture was improved as a result. He added that density was critical. Member Feinberg and Michael Franks agreed that the six foot wall between the restaurant and Building One would not prevent aromas from traveling. It was confirmed that all buildings would be ADA accessible. Member Weatherford voiced his concerns about traffic cutting through the residential area. Member Kunisch applauded the addition of a playground area for children. He also questioned, and it was answered, that all mechanical units would be located on the rooftops and would not be visible. Citizens voicing concerns included: • Bob Oro • E. W. Shaffer • Max Dickerson • Conny Culver • Terry Parish • Bill Adler • Paul Schloss • Fran LaSala Issues discussed included: • Landscaping to screen views • Heights and appearance of buildings • Mixed Use Development and lack of guidelines • Overcrowding of site • Traffic & safety concerns • Negative impact on adjoining neighborhoods • Crime • Impact on schools • Underground parking • Market feasibility Stephanie Athey spoke in favor of the proposed apartments, and cited the success of the Golf Villas, which she manages. Mark Simon, representing the applicant, addressed their right to build apartments on the site based on the current zoning. MOTION: Vice Chair Mager moved to continue OV 12-02-06 Development Plan. Member Kunisch seconded the motion. F:\Minutes\DRB\2003\5-13-03 minutes.doc Minutes approved 6-10-03 8 5/13/2003 Development Review Board Minutes Page 9 The Development Review Board individually complimented the architect on the design of the buildings. Member Weatherford expressed concerns regarding the circulation of traffic, overcrowding of the site, and the proximity of the restaurant to residential units. Member Feinberg commented that he did not see the point of extending the review any further. He expressed that the site was overcrowded and therefore could not provide sufficient greenbelts and buffers. He felt the project was not in harmony with surrounding neighborhoods, and was not confident that mixed use development would have a positive impact on the community. Member Kunisch questioned the safety of the traffic flow, the health of the residents who are subject to the smell of the restaurant and car fumes from the commercial development, and the welfare and happiness of the future residents. Member Caswell reported on her search for a definition of mixed use development; it is defined by Atlanta Quality Growth as "...a coming together of differing yet complimentary activities of commercial, recreational and cultural". She asserted that this project did not meet such standards. She agreed with Member Feinberg's findings. Vice Chair Mager maintained that the proposed development is inferior in design to the development plan that she originally approved. She analyzed the comparison to the Golf Villas, with its rolling hills and grassy areas, and asserted that they would not be comparable. In addition, circulation and child safety were of great concern to her. Chairman Vogelsberg inquired if it would be appropriate to continue the item. Member Weatherford expressed doubt that any further suggestions would promote progress. Continuing the item was advocated by Vice Chair Mager because she did not feel that it was ready to go to the Mayor and Town Council for approval. Chairman Vogelsberg perceived that the Board would be doing the applicant an injustice to continue the item without including more instruction. Member Kunisch questioned what guidelines the DRB should follow for mixed use development, and whether they should table the item until the General Plan is approved. Member Feinberg remarked that he did not see any substantial changes in the plan since the last time they reviewed it, and questioned if any progress would be made upon a continuance. CALL TO QUESTION: Chairman Vogelsberg Don't Continue Vice Chair Mager Continue Member Feinberg Don't Continue Member Kunisch Don't Continue Member Weatherford Continue Member Caswell Continue MOTION: Motion failed with a tie, 3-3. F:\Minutes\DRB\2003\5-13-03 minutes.doe Minutes approved 6-10-03 9 5/13/2003 Development Review Board Minutes Page 10 Member Feinberg recommended denial because the development is not in harmony with the adjacent neighborhoods, and because the Development Review Board does not yet have guidelines that apply to mixed use development. Member Weatherford recommended denial based upon safety issues related to the internal circulation, and aesthetic issues due to the overcrowding of the site. The undercurrent of unhappiness of the surrounding neighbors would be expressed to Town Council by Chairman Vogelsberg. MOTION: Member Feinberg moved to recommend denial of OV 12-02-06 Development Plan. Member Caswell seconded the motion. Motion carried, 6-0. 7. OV12-02-06, SEAVER-FRANKS ARCHITECTS AND EEC, REPRESENTING THE BEZTAK COMPANIES, REQUEST APPROVAL OF A LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR 138 UNITS OF APARTMENTS WITH A CULBHOUSE AND RECREATION FACILITIES AND 31,187 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LAMBERT LANE AND LA CANADA DRIVE, PARCEL 224-250-25C MOTION: Vice Chair Mager moved to recommend denial of OV 12-02-06 Landscape Plan. Member Weatherford seconded the motion. Motion carried, 6-0. 8. OV13-02-27, SEAVER-FRANKS ARCHITECTS, REPRESENTING THE BEZTAK COMPANIES, REQUESTS APPROVAL OF THE ARCHITECTURE FOR 138 APARTMENTS UNITS AND APPROXIMATELY 31, 187 SQUARE FET OF COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LAMBERT LANE AND LA CANADA DRIVE, PARCEL 224-250- 25C MOTION: Member Caswell moved to recommend denial of OV13-02-27 Architecture Plan. Member Kunisch seconded the motion. Motion carried, 6-0. 9. OV13-03-16, FLUORESCO LIGHTING AND SIGN COMPANY, REPRESENTING THE BEZTAK COMPANIES, REQUESTS APPROVAL OF A COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PACKAGE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LA CANADA DRIVE AND LAMBERT LANE, PARCEL#224-25-025E. F:\Minutes\DRB\2003\5-13-03 minutes.doc Minutes approved 6-10-03 10 5/13/2003 Development Review Board Minutes Page 11 Bob Conant introduced the staff report into the record. Staff recommended that the DRB recommend approval to Town Council, unless the sign package was changed to meet code, in which case staff would recommend that the DRB approve the sign package. Richard Curtis, representing Fluoresco, addressed the Board. He stated that he did not have the authority to change the monument sign from 8 feet to 6 feet, but that he believed it could be done if wall heights did not interfere with views of the sign. Vice Chair Mager inquired about the placement of the signs, and how they would be affected by a new development plan. Bryant Nodine answered that none of the signs would be placed until the development plan is approved; the comprehensive sign package would be used to review the Bank One sign package. MOTION: Member Weatherford moved to recommend to Town Council approval of OV13-03-16 Comprehensive Sign Package, unless the applicant agrees to lower the free standing signs from 8 feet to 6 feet, in which case the motion is for DRB to approve. Member Caswell seconded the motion. Motion carried, 6-0. 10. OV12-03-03, WELLS FARGO BANK REQUESTS APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A 6,480 SQUARE FEET OFFICE BUILDING/ BANK IN A C-2 COMMERCIAL DISTRICT; THE PROPOSED USE WOULD INCLUDE A DRIVE-UP FACILITY, LOCATED WITHIN THE PLACITA DE ORO SHOPPING CENTER AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TANGERINE ROAD AND FIRST AVENUE, 11951 N. FIRST AVENUE, A PORTION OF PARCEL 224-021-700. Bob Conant introduced the staff report into the record. Staff recommended approval of the Development Plan, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit"A". Staff Conditions: 1. The Applicant shall ensure that the pedestrian pathway system for the Project connects with the shopping center pedestrian pathway system with consistent dimensions, materials, landscaping, lighting and signage. The Applicant shall install their portion of this approved pathway system on their premises at locations that are acceptable to the Planning and Zoning Department. 2. As an alternate means of meeting the OVZCR Section 9-102(E) 4--screening of building wall--standard, the Applicant shall provide: (1) A 2 foot landscaped area along the building wall of the western facade (as shown Sheet 2 of the proposed landscape plan; (2) a 5 foot wide sidewalk next to that landscaped area; (3) two additional landscaped parking islands within the parking aisle directly west of the western building wall, for a total of 5 landscaped parking islands along this western wall; and (4) the 5 parking islands would be densely landscaped. F:\Minutes\DRB\2003\5-13-03 minutes.doc Minutes approved 6-10-03 11 5/13/2003 Development Review Board Minutes Page 12 3. Mechanical equipment, whether ground level or roof-mounted, shall be screened from public view and designed to be perceived as an integral part of the building. Electrical meter and service components shall be screened from public view and painted to match the exterior color of the adjacent building. 4. The Applicant shall provide the following security measures: (1) install low-profile ATM equipment in the drive-through islands such that, during the day when the drive- through teller is on duty, the teller can view the activities of the ATM facilities; (2) install closed circuit video cameras able to view each ATM machine and its immediate environs (this is in addition to the video cameras installed on the face of the ATM machines) and ensure that the ATMs are taped from dusk to dawn; and (3) ensure that landscaping and architectural features near ATM machines and pedestrian pathways leading to the ATM machines do not provide any "nooks and crannies" for a person to hide in. 5. The Applicant shall submit a lighting plan which is consistent with an approved lighting plan for the shopping center. Such submittal shall be made to the Planning and Zoning Department prior to issuance of a building permit for the Project. 6. The Applicant shall correct page number of Book and Page of 15 foot TEP easement along the north property line on Sheet 1 of the Development Plan. Steve Oliverio, representing the WLB Group, addressed the Board. Bill Adler, 10720 N. Eagle Eye Place, suggested that the circulation around the building be one way instead of two. Member Weatherford inquired about angled parking and Mr. Adler's suggestion. Craig Civalier responded that there would be additional development later in this project that would be affected by one-way circulation, but they would work with the engineers to get stop signs placed in appropriate locations. MOTION: Member Kunisch moved to approve OV12-03-03 Development Plan, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit A. Member Feinberg seconded the motion. Motion carried, 6-0. 11. OV12-03-03, WELLS FARGO BANK REQUESTS APPROVAL OF A LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR A 6,480 SQUARE FEET OFFICE BUILDING/ BANK LOCATED WITHIN THE PLACITA DE ORO SHOPPING CENTER AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TANGERINE ROAD AND FIRST AVENUE, 11951 N. FIRST AVENUE,A PORTION OF PARCEL 224-021-700. Bob Conant introduced the staff report into the record. Staff recommended approval of the Landscape Plan, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit"A". F:\Minutes\DRB\2003\5-13-03 minutes.doc Minutes approved 6-10-03 12 5/13/2003 Development Review Board Minutes Page 13 Staff Conditions: 1. Per the condition of the master landscape plan for the shopping center (OV 12-00-09),the Applicant shall provide a pedestrian opening in the 6 foot tall screen wall adjacent to the Tangerine Hills subdivision to permit pedestrian access into the site. This pedestrian opening in the screen wall shall be situated next to a parking island on the western side of the parking lot to avoid light from vehicle headlights penetrating the screen wall and impacting residents to the west as well as to minimize pedestrian-vehicle conflicts. 2. The Applicant shall ensure that the pedestrian pathway system for the Project connects with the shopping center pedestrian pathway system with consistent dimensions, materials, landscaping, lighting and signage. The Applicant shall install their portion of this approved pathway system at locations on their premises that are acceptable to the Planning and Zoning Department. 3. As an alternate means of meeting the OVZCR Section 9-102(E) 4--screening of building wall--standard, the Applicant shall provide: (1) A 2 foot landscaped area along the building wall of the western facade (as shown Sheet 2 of the proposed landscape plan; (2) a 5 foot wide sidewalk next to that landscaped area; (3) two additional landscaped parking islands within the parking aisle directly west of the western building wall, for a total of 5 landscaped parking islands along this western wall; and (4) the 5 parking islands would be densely landscaped and shall include plants that would achieve a height of 15 feet. 4. The Applicant shall ensure that trees or tall plants are not placed in such a way as to obstruct light emanating from security light standards within the parking area or exterior building area. 5. The Applicant shall ensure that trees, wall-covering plants, or other plants that might achieve heights of 4 feet or greater are placed on the site in such a way as to avoid obstructing views of signage from pedestrians and motorists. 6. Plantings shall not obstruct views of ATM facilities by passers-by, nor should they provide"nooks and crannies" for persons to hide in. Steve Oliverio,representing the WLB Group, addressed the Board and answered questions. Member Kunisch observed that the trees in the Walgreen's parking lot make it difficult for customers to get out of their cars; he inquired if a different type or height of tree could be used. Steve Oliverio responded that the problem would be resolved once the trees matured. MOTION: Member Feinberg moved to approve OV12-03-03 Landscape Plan, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit A. Member Weatherford seconded the motion. Motion carried, 6-0. F:\Minutes\DRB\2003\5-13-03 minutes.doc Minutes approved 6-10-03 13 5/13/2003 Development Review Board Minutes Page 14 12. OV13-03-19, WELLS FARGO BANK REQUESTS APPROVAL OF THE ARCHITECTURE FOR A 6,480 SQUARE FEET OFFICE BUILDING/ BANK, INCLUDING A DRIVE-UP FACILITY, LOCATED WITHIN THE PLACITA DE ORO SHOPPING CENTER AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TANGERINE ROAD AND FIRST AVENUE, 11951 N. FIRST AVENUE, A PORTION OF PARCEL 224-021-700. Bob Conant introduced the staff report into the record. Staff recommended approval of the Architecture Plan, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit"A". Staff Conditions: 1. The Applicant shall provide a bench at the exterior of the front entrance. 2. Windows shall be located in such a way as to provide "natural surveillance" of pedestrian pathways,parking areas and the ATM machines as viewed by occupants of the building. 3. Clerestory windows or other architectural treatments such as decorative metal or tile appliqués (similar to that of the Walgreens' building) shall be added to the western portion of the south façade to avoid the large expanse of blank wall. 4. Rooftop mechanical equipment, vents and ducts shall be screened from view by the pedestrian or motorist. Screening shall be consistent with building design. 5. The Applicant shall use low reflectivity materials. Richard Jakedi, the architect for this project, made a presentation and answered questions. MOTION: Member Weatherford moved to approve OV13-03-19 Architecture Plan, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit A. Member Kunisch seconded the motion. Motion carried, 6-0. 13. DISCUSSION ITEM, PROPOSED POLICIES RELATIVE TO PARK AND RECREATION AREA DESIGN IN THE CURRENT VERSION OF THE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE Bill Adler, 10720 N. Eagle Eye Place, addressed the Board regarding the proposed General Plan's language relating to parks. The Board reached a consensus to recommend changing policies to provide"equitable" access to all parks. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Member Weatherford moved to adjourn the May 13, 2003 Development Review Board Meeting at 10:48 pm. Member Kunisch seconded the motion. Motion carried 6-0. Respectfully submitted by, Recording Secretary, Kristina Curry F:\Minutes\DRB\2003\5-13-03 minutes.doc Minutes approved 6-10-03 14 JPo_EY Aq� TOWN OF ORO VALLEY oh 2o � COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 7. Planning and Zoning • Building Safety t 11000 N.La Canada Drive,Oro Valley,AZ 85737•(520)229-4800•Fax(520)742-1022 14> Oro Valley Public Library A A 1305 W.Naranja Drive,Oro Valley,AZ 85737• (520)229-5300•Fax(520)229-5319 A Parks and Recreation "'UNDER�g 680 W.Calle Concordia,Oro Valley,AZ 85737•(520)229-5050•Fax(520)797-2202 May 14, 92-„.2003 Brock Qualls Golf Villas 17-204 10950 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley, AZ 85737 RE: OV13-03-18, Lots 7, 10, 11 and 13 Fairway Village Architectural Review, Parcels 224-240-440, 224-240-470, 224-240-480 and 224-240-500 Dear Mr. Qualls: At their regular meeting of May 13, 2003, the Development Review by a majority vote (6-0) approved your request for Architectural Review. The conditions listed in Exhibit A attached must be addressed prior to the issuance of a building permit. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at 229-4822. Very ruly yours Robert M. Conant, Jr. Planner II attachment cc: Shirley Gay, Development Coordinator File www.townoforovalley.com EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OV13-03-18 1. A cap must be placed over the spark arrestors; however, all vents and chimneys must terminate per appliance manufacturer listings. The fixture is subject to review by Planning and Zoning and the Town Building Official. 2. No two models with the same color scheme shall be placed next to each other.