Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOV1304012 (2) • a Q(,j0�1Lva,c,,,,, APR 15 2004 `41/vD)',y�'. Planning &Zoning Division 11000 N. La Canada Drive, Oro Valley AZ 85737 Phone: (520)229-4800 Fax: (520) 742-1022 www.townoforovalley.com APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROJECT ARCHITECTURE DATE: °f- /5- o 4( OV CASE NO.: 0 U 13 — 0 y—1 -- (office use only) PROJECT NAME: L,AtSW of AilvtL1R.k4. SUBDIVISION LOT# LOCATION I ADDRESS: PAX 3, 'AFE V157b 124.AZQ ZONING go FAD 6-) PARCEL NUMBER: 223-62-O4O LOT SIZE OM is.c -s MODEL NAMES OR NUMBERS APPLICANT: MiTra5TAIPT Gv4fEIL * P6d014,4 1 LT. Ce JtAeT: 5 S\ J- AcPL2.. ADDRESS: 41 > C- VAii0 6 . sit.. 2 o R 3,X, AZ OSZOS PHONE NO.: 602- '3' -+Z 31 FAX NO.: 602-273- IZ) ,- .-. ...,. - -...-... ...,..r__.. ..--..-.. PROPERTY OWNER: &FE 4rrrAC.Et99 ADDRESS: PHONE NO.: FAX NO: DEVELOPMENT R EW BOARD HEARING DATE: SIGNATURE: _ DATE: 41S-CA" Submittal Requirements: - Fees V. One copy of 24x36 elevations and floor plan 114 or 118 scale✓ ,yA-:One copy of 24x36 site plan 40 scale (Custom Lots Only) 44- :Typical lot lay out for subdivision N/� Models-Lot fit analysis for subdivisions :Cut sheets for lighting(All Commercial Projects,Custom Homes,and Model Plans) Fifteen copies of the following: Dimensioned Elevations of all four sides of all buildings and floor plan(11"x 17"format) Commercial projects require color d rigs or photographs of elevations(8 Yz"x 11"format) List square footage of buildings tr Site Plan(11"x 17"format) t/ Color chips of body,trim and roof tiles(81/:"by 11"format)Commercial and Residential t/ Applications will not be accepted without all required materials. SUBMITTALS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AT LEAST 18 CALENDAR DAYS IN ADVANCE OF THE DESIRED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD HEARING DATE.SUBMITTALS ARE DUE BY NOON F:IAdmin PZIFORMSIShannon Project Subdivision Development HandoutiDRBPROJARCHAPP.doc ice=ss� rr, - <,t�1L--- 1�1 t l�t�; e41 y 1 _1 TO 2731218 P.c in2 Itt SAFE AY INC. 77SO S-Priest Drive.Tempe,AZ 85282 April 29,2004 Ms- Shirley Gay APR 2001i Development Coordinator To n of c Valley .000 N.La Canada Dr. 1.IUVV Oro Valley,AZ 85737 Dear Ms. Gay, As carrent Property Owner,this letter is to provide Mr. Stephen J. Cooper of Mittelstaedt �r..,�.., ,.�'tlr«'Clallt�� Cooper&Associates,Ltd_ authorization to submit documents to the Town o_Oro with regard to the development of the Bank of America project located at the Safeway � toso lazesIf yell have any questions or need further information,please contact me r t�tvav Plaza. yell the-address dross aridtelephone number as shown- Thank you for your assistance in this 4 ul��illlil GJ� telephone----- matter. Sincerely, A .727 And Marys th Safeway Stores, Inc. ** TOTAL PAGE.02 ** • • April 29,2004 APR 1 5 2004 • Ms. Shirley Gay Development Coordinator Town of Oro Valley 11 000 N. La Canada Dr. Oro Valley,AZ 85737 Dear Ms.Gay, As current Property Owner,this letter is to provide Mr.Stephen J_Cooper of Mittelstaedt Cooper&Associates,Ltd.authorization to submit docents to the Town of Oro Valley with regard to the development of the Bank of America project located at the Safeway Vistoso Plaza. If you have any questions or need further information,please contact me at the address and telephone number as shown. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely, 6 -eJA, Deborah Froeb Regency Realty Group,Inc. • • • • Bank of America APR 2 0104 Safeway Vistoso Plaza Oro Valley, Arizona Current Property Owners Regency Realty Group, Inc. c/o Deborah Froeb The Centerra Building 1873 S. Bellaire Street, Suite 600 Denver, CO 80222 303-885-6989 Safeway Stores, Inc. c/o Mary Smith 2750 S. Priest Tempe, AZ 85282 480-894-4257 # • -1 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY STAFF REPORT TO THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING DATE: May 20, 2004 TO: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD FROM: Robert Conant,Planner II SUBJECT: OV13-04-13, MITTELSTAEDT COOPER ASSOCIATES, REPRESENTING THE BANK OF AMERICA, REQUESTS ARECHITECTURAL REVIEW FOR A 4,497 SQUARE FOOT BANK BUILDING AT THE SAFEWAY VISTOSO PLAZA, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF TANGERINE ROAD AND RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD, PARCEL 220-020-340 BACKGROUND: Mittelstaedt Cooper Associates, representing Bank of America, requests DRB approval of architectural elevations for a 4,497 square foot bank to be constructed at the Safeway Vistoso Plaza on the northeast corner of Tangerine Road and Rancho Vistoso Boulevard. The project site is zoned PAD, Rancho Vistoso land use designation of Community Commercial,with a 34-foot maximum building height limitation. SUMMARY: The 4,497 square foot building consists of the bank and drive through tellers. The exterior colors match the existing color palette and materials of the shopping center. The north and south facades of the building, which face the parking area and the entrance drive, are the longest expanse of building, but are broken with glass and stone veneer with a gabled roof line. The front elevation which faces the entry drive and the Safeway gas station consists of an aluminum storefront system with insulated glass. This façade also includes the ATM machines which have been intergraded into the building design. The rear façade faces the parking area and All About Running and Walking and is a blank wall enhanced with stone veneer and enhanced landscaping to soften the blankness of the wall. This elevation does not have any fenestrations, because it is the back room of the bank. The canopy for the drive through tellers is a flat roof matching the color of the building and accented with stone veneer, the landscaping will soften this protrusion from the building. The east and west facades face Rancho Vistoso Boulevard and the center parking area. The east façade includes glazing and enhanced landscaping, while the west façade is hidden under the drive through teller canopy, but has the service window for the operation of the drive through. This façade faces Rancho Vistoso Boulevard, but is hidden because of the 6-8 foot elevation difference between the street and the building pad. All mechanical equipment will be roof mounted and screened by the parapet. Design Guidelines: The following Design Guidelines apply to this project: Section 16-103(B)(3)(a)Design buildings at the ground or pedestrian level that express human scale. • TOWN OF ORO VALLEY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT Page 2 The building has been designed to a pedestrian level. The ceiling of the entry canopy is at 12-feet which creates a good pedestrian feel. Section 16-103(B)(4)(d)Encourage wall mass over glass area. Because of the nature of the building, there is more wall mass than glazing which conforms to the sprit of the design guideline. The wall mass; however, is softened by the landscaping. • The bank design has employed the use of CPTED (Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design), by the placement of glazing and doors. The ATM's have been positioned in accordance with CPTED principals of being free of landscaping and are well lit. Also by their positioning good surveillance is obtained from different angles of the front parking area of the bank and from the entrance drive and center parking PAAL of the shopping center. ZONING CODE COMPLIANCE: The project is in compliance with the OVZCR and the Rancho Vistoso PAD. GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE: The proposed architecture for the branch bank building complies with the General Plan by promoting Policy 9.1A, which incorporates "Architectural themes are intended to blend the built environment with natural surroundings." This project integrates into the Safeway Vistoso Plaza by designing the building in a similar style to the built plaza. Also, all four sides of the building have been comprehensively designed and treated. PUBLIC PRESENTATION: Pursuant to Resolution (R) 98-31, "all presentations before Boards, Commissions and Council of rezonings, subdivision plats, development plans, and planned area developments must be formatted to be shown on the Town's projection system or overhead system. The Planning and Zoning Administrator; however, may exempt certain projects." A presentation must designed to insure that the audience, staff and voting body can view the graphics. Examples of acceptable computer formats are Power Point, Arc View, a videotape presentation and/or overhead transparences. The applicant is responsible for the development, presentation and coordination of all presentation materials. If an applicant does not conform to the aforementioned resolution the item may be continued due to non- compliance. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the DRB approve the architecture for the Bank of America, subject to the conditions in Exhibit A. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT Page 3 SUGGESTED MOTIONS: The DRB may wish to consider one of the following suggested motions: I move to approve OV13-04-13, the Bank of America architecture, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit A, attached herewith. OR I move to approve OV13-04-13, the Bank of America architecture, subject to the conditions listed Exhibit A, attached herewith and the following added conditions: OR I move deny OV 13-04-13, the Bank of America architecture finding that: . Attachments: 1. Exhibit A 2. Architecture Contact: Stephen Cooper Mittelstaedt Cooper Fax (602) 273-1218 EXHIBIT A CONDTIONS OF APPROVAL BANK OF AMERICA OV13-04-13 1. All signage shall be approved by Planning and Zoning prior to the issuance of a sign permit. Architectural approval does not constitute approval of any signage. 2. All mechanical equipment shall be screened by the parapet. Ov13-bL( 13 MINUTES OF THE ORO VALLEY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING THURSDAY,MAY 20, 2004 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11000 NORTH LA CANADA DRIVE REGULAR MEETING CALL TO ORDER: 6:06 p.m. PRESENT: Mary Caswell, Vice Chair Clark Reddin,Member Coney Culver, Member Jim Weatherford, Member Al Kunisch, Member ALSO PRESENT: Paul Loomis, Mayor Bryant Nodine, Planning and Zoning Administrator Joe Andrews, Civil Attorney Craig Civalier, Development Review Division Manager Robert Conant, Planner II Catherine Hendrix, Secretary II ABSENT: Jim Vogelsberg, Chair Richard Feinberg, Member • to 5/20/2004 Development Review Board Minutes Page 2 CONSENT AGENDA A. OV13-04-12, A.F. STERLING REQUESTS ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL OF MODEL HOMES 2300, 2675, 2787, 2842, 3333, 3541 FOR VISTOSO HIGHLANDS, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF MOORE ROAD AND LA CANADA DRIVE EXTENDED, PARCELS 219-490-010 AND 219-490- 020. The 56.77 acre subdivision will contain 68 lots. B. OV13-04-14, D. ALAN ROBERTS, REPRESENTING PROPERTY OWNER GREGG SEAHOLM, REQUESTS APPROVAL OF ARCHITECTURE FOR A TWO STORY CUSTOM HOME TO BE BUILT ON LOT 74 OF THE CANADA HILLS ESTATES SUBDIVISION; LOCATED ONE QUARTER MILE EAST FROM THE INTERSECTION OF LA CANADA DRIVE AND NARANJA DRIVE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF NARANJA DRIVE,PARCEL 224-26-6510. Residence is located in Phase II of Canada Hills Estates, at the southeast corner of La Canada and Naranja Drives. Vice Chair Caswell requested a motion. MOTION: Member Culver MOVED to approve Consent Agenda Items A and B. Member Weatherford SECONDED the motion. Motion carried 5-0. REGULAR AGENDA 1. OV3-04-03, EVERGREEN DEVCO, INC REQUESTS APPROVAL OF A SIGN CRITERIA FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE PLACITA DE ORO (WALGREENS) DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT 11951 N. FIRST AVENUE, PARCEL #224-02-170A, 224-02-170B AND 224-02-170C. Robert Conant gave the staff report. Roxannne Fields, Evergreen Devco, 2920 East Camelback, Number 100, Phoenix, Arizona 85016, stated that Wells Fargo gave her their ideas for the signage from the First Avenue and Oracle location. The use of red and yellow looks good and they do not think it will take away from the development; therefore, they do not want to limit its use. Mr. Nodine replied to Member Weatherford that staff negotiated with Wells Fargo and they were to comply with the Rooney Ranch sign criteria; however, there was a threat of a lawsuit and it went to Council. Ultimately, the sizes of the logo were pulled down and they were allowed to have the ATM signs. The signs were smaller then originally proposed, but they were allowed the red, yellow, white and black colors. They do not have the yellow Wells Fargo across the front. F:\Minutes\DRB\2004\5-20-04 Minutes.doc Approved on 7/13/04 2 5/20/2004 Development Review Board Minutes Page 3 David Thorn, representing Wells Fargo, 100 West Washington, Suite 1430, Phoenix, Arizona, affirmed that all of the signs were registered corporate logos. Mr. Nodine replied to Member Weatherford that Wells Fargo is able to use the ATM wall logo or the yellow Wells Fargo, if it is a registered trademark, as long as it is held to the eight square foot size. Steve Markovich, 3162 East 47th Street, with Pearson Signs, built the signs at the First Avenue and Oracle Road Wells Fargo location. He asked the staff when does business identification become a logo and is limited to eight square feet. The ordinance does not state that. The logo they are asking for is on the direction or on the cabinet wall signs. Mr. Nodine stated that staff considers something the business uses for identification as a logo. Also, when a business uses the sign criteria and copper patina it is treated like text or wall sign, not a logo; therefore, they can go to the full text size. MOTION: Member Weatherford MOVED to conditionally approve OV3-04- 03, Sign Criteria for Placita De Oro, subject to the condition in Exhibit "A". Member Kunisch SECONDED the motion. Motion carried 5-0. 3. OV12-03-26, BAKER ENGINEERING, REPRESENTING NEW WORLD DEVELOPMENT, REQUESTS APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR 105 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF TANGERINE ROAD JUST NORTH OF THE NARANJA TOWN SITE, PARCEL 224-018-270 Robert Conant presented the staff report. Member Weatherford inquired about the future road planning of Tangerine Road. He noted that there are a lot of access roads connecting to Tangerine because of the subdivisions. He understood that east of First Avenue is state highway and the remaining portion is a state route. At one point he knew there was talk about eight lane control access on Tangerine Road. Mr. Civalier responded by stating that he thought it could become six lanes. There is enough room on the sides for a four lane divided highway for 20 years. Mr. Andrews was unaware the land was part of a bond package and would look into it for Member Kunisch. Mr. Nodine affirmed that the bonds have been approved; they are being set up with the County, and would enter into negotiations with this property owner. Until then, they look at it as moving forward if it meets code. If this does not meet code or information is missing, it can be continued. F:\Minutes\DRB\2004\5-20-04 Minutes.doc Approved on 7/13/04 3 5/20/2004 Development Review Board Minutes Page 4 Member Kunisch was concerned that the lots of these houses are small and it will look cluttered as you come into the Naranja Town Park. He would-also like the subdivision park moved so it is more secure for the children that will play in the park. Mr. Civalier stated that the Applicant is dedicating the property along the west side lots. It is a four lane road with a sidewalk on the east side. The west side drops to the wash toward the eastside to create a slope. Mr. Conant informed that staff came up with the park's location because it can be seen on the way to the Naranja Town site. After discussions with the developer, this was considered the best site. Martin Magelli, Applicant, 1636 North Swan Road, Suite 200, answered Member Culver that they looked into coving for meandering streets; unfortunately, there was not enough room. Member Culver said the homes will be for families with children and the straight streets are invitations for fast driving. It would also be a more attractive layout with the curves. With coving, you will not lose lots but it would be more work. Member Weatherford asked why they chose to push Street `B" through to intersect with Street "A" instead of intersecting with Streets "E" or "F"? The subdivisions main intersection would be too close to Tangerine Road. Mr. Magelli responded that initially there were too many lots per street and the setback requirements forced them to use Street`B"to intersect with Street "A". Bill Adler, 10720 North Eagle Eye Place, acknowledged the piece of land is sloped with rolling contours. It is important to split up the cookie cutter look, and flow with the rolling contour and enhance the views. Maybe in time, the Town will quit doing Pre-Annexation agreements where it exempts people from applying the Town's rules and requirements. To enhance views, the lots can be rotated to face the mountains. You want a project that can endure people to become long- term residents. MOTION: Member Culver MOVED to recommend to Town Council to approve OV 12-03-26, with the following conditions: 1) Applicant to work with the staff to implement at least some of the coving techniques and improve the streetscape (be respectful of the existing contours and realize that you are permitted masquerading; and 2) Orientation of the homes on the plat, the direction it will be facing and are aisles on the park will be made available for review before presenting the item to the Council (with homes facing the park so children can be observed in the recreation area.) Member Weatherford SECONDED the motion. Discussion: Member Weatherford was apprehensive about the motion because the conditions completely change the plat; therefore, DRB would be approving something and the Applicant would take something completely different to Council. It should be continued or denied. F:\Minutes\DRB\2004\5-20-04 Minutes.doc Approved on 7/13/04 4 5/20/2004 Development Review Board Minutes Page 5 Mr. Andrews confirmed to Member Kunisch that if they deny this Item, it can go to Council for appeal. AMENDMENT TO MOTION: Member Culver MOVED TO AMEND THE MOTION to continue OV 12-03-26, with the following conditions to implement coving techniques, improve the streetscape, use the existing contours, and have some houses facing the recreational area. Member Weatherford SECONDED the motion with an additional amendment that the intersection of Street "A" and Street "B"be moved further south. Member Culver accepted the additional condition. Mr. Conant confirmed to Member Culver that the changes could be accomplished by the July meeting. Motion as amended carried 5-0. 4. OV12-03-26, ACUNA COFFIN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS, REPRESENTING NEW WORLD DEVELOPMENT, REQUESTS APPROVAL OF THE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR 105 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF TANGERINE ROAD JUST NORTH OF THE NARANJA TOWN SITE, PARCEL 224-018-270 Robert Conant presented the staff report. Mr. Adler recalled that eight years ago it was passed that an acre of recreational space needed to be established per 85 houses. Instead of this park being 10,000 square feet, it should be an acre and a half. If DRB reconsidered the plat it would be responsible that they look at the park's location and size. MOTION: Member Kunisch MOVED to continue OV 12-03-26 to the July meeting with the recommendation that they move the park to a different location where everyone can use it, and it can be enlarged. Member Reddin SECONDED the motion. Motion carried 5-0. 5. OV12-04-04, MITTELSTAEDT COOPER ASSOCIATES, REPRESENTING THE BANK OF AMERICA, REQUESTS APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A BANK BUILDING AT THE SAFEWAY VISTOSO PLAZA, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF TANGERINE ROAD AND RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD, PARCEL 220-020-340 F:\Minutes\DRB\2004\5-20-04 Minutes.doc Approved on 7/13/04 5 • , 5/20/2004 Development Review Board Minutes Page 6 Robert Conant gave the staff report. Member Culver was concerned about the fuel truck's entrance and exit while making deliveries to the gas station, and for the safety of persons using the blind intersection. Mr. Civalier showed on the map the route the fuel truck makes around the bank. He continued that they have discussed different routes for the truck; however, they will not go in front of the grocery store. Tenants in the shopping center want stop signs. When future property opens they will need to move paths and loading zones. Bruce Patton, 1745 East River Road, Suite 11, thanked staff and approved of their conditions. Bill Adler, 10720 North Eagle Eye, was also concerned about the circulation issues and danger. The fuel truck could go behind the store to increase circulation. He thought the bank should be moved to another Pad. The congestion of the gas, bank and retail would not be resolved by putting a mirror at the intersection nor will someone be able to predict speed or accuracy. It would not be advisable to increase traffic to an unsafe area. David Newbaker, 4130 East Van Buren, Phoenix, Arizona 85008, appreciated Mr. Adler's comments. The safety concerns did motivate an alternate site for the drive thru by lengthening the corridor and putting it into the interior. The modified plan would dramatically reduce the traffic because the banks entire traffic would be contained. It would provide 18 feet per parking space and 24 feet of drive aisle with plenty of room for vehicles to back up. Mr. Andrews replied to Member Culver that DRB can give the owner information on traffic problems, but we cannot put the burden on the bank. He was unsure if something needs to be recommended by staff or the DRB. Even though Mr. Civalier said there was a danger; however, there was not a study or an expert stating so. This was not on the agenda this evening; therefore, no action can be taken. Mr. Nodine stated that it could be made part of the record and staff can convey that record. Mr. Conant added that he had conversations with the owner of the center and they have insured they will install two stop signs. Staff took all the action they could and this was why the condition listed in Exhibit A is repeated. Mr. Civalier suggested giving the stop signs a chance and restricting loading and unloading zones. Member Kunisch asserted if there was a restriction on the loading zone, it would put a burden on the businesses. An alternative would be for the property owner of Safeway to buy a chunk of the northern boundary land to expand the driveway. Member Reddin indicated the issues they were discussing do not relate to the bank's site and needed to be addressed in a different forum. F:Wlinutes\DRB\2004\5-20-04 Minutes.doc Approved on 7/13/04 6 5/20/2004 Development Review Board Minutes Page 7 Member Culver agreed; however, she wants the patrons of the bank to be safe. Mr. Conant confirmed that the Pad is owned by Bank of America and not by the shopping center owners. MOTION: Member Kunisch MOVED to recommend that the Town Council approve OV 12-04-04, Development Plan for the Bank of America, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit A striking out the last sentence in Item 2, "The intersection improvements shall be made prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for All About Running and Walking and Bank of America." Member Reddin SECONDED the motion. Motion carried 5-0. 6. OV12-04-04, MITTELSTAEDT COOPER ASSOCIATES, REPRESENTING THE BANK OF AMERICA, REQUESTS APPROVAL OF A LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR A BANK BUILDING AT THE SAFEWAY VISTOSO PLAZA, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF TANGERINE ROAD AND RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD, PARCEL 220-020-340 Robert Conant presented the staff report. Mr. Newbaker noted that he went over the requirements to make a nice product and one that fits into the desert. MOTION: Member Kunisch MOVED to approve OV 12-04-04, the Landscape Plan for Bank of America. Member Reddin SECONDED the motion. Motion carried 5-0. 7. OV13-04-13, MITTELSTAEDT COOPER ASSOCIATES, REPRESENTING THE BANK OF AMERICA, REQUEST ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW FOR A 4,497 SQUARE FOOT BANK BUILDING AT THE SAFEWAY VISTOSO PLAZA, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF TANGERINE ROAD AND RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD, PARCEL 220-02-340 Robert Conant gave the staff report. Mr. Newbaker asserted that normally the back of a bank is flat with no dimension. In Elevation B, the trees and greenery were added. The faux windows in the other Elevation are more expensive to replace if broken and the drywall immediately behind it would also need replacing. As for energy codes the faux windows would not be efficient. MOTION: Member Kunisch MOVED to approve OV13-04-13, the Bank of F:Wlinutes\DRB\2004\5-20-04 Minutes.doc Approved on 7/13/04 7 5/20/2004 Development Review Board Minutes Page 8 America architecture, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit A with approval of Elevation B. Member Weatherford SECONDED the motion. Motion carried 5-0. 8. OV12-03-29, TMHS, REPRESENTING VISTOSO PARTNERS, REQUESTS APPROVAL OF THE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR 360 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS, LOCATED IN RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 10 AND 11 (PARCELS B! C AC) NORTH OF MOORE ROAD ABUTTING THE WESTERN BOUNDARY OF THE RANCHO VISTOSO PAD, PARCEL 219-190-02G Robert Conant presented the staff report. Eric Barrett, Applicant, 5515 East Grant Road, Suite 100, agreed with the conditions listed by Staff. Member Reddin acknowledged their nice job. MOTION: Member Weatherford MOVED to approve OV 12-03-29, Landscape Plan for Rancho Vistoso parcels B, C and AC, Neighborhoods 10 and 11 subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit A. Member Reddin SECONDED the motion. Motion carried 5-0. Recess: 7:38 p.m. Reconvene: 7:47 p.m. 2. OV12-03-34, WLB GROUP, REPRESENTING STONE CANYON LLC, REQUESTS APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR 82 SINGLE- FAMILY LOTS, STONE CANYON VII, LOCATED NORTH OF TORTOLITA MOUNTAIN DRIVE,IN RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 11 Robert Conant presented the staff report. Member Culver requested clarification on Exhibit A, Condition 3 regarding Ordinance 02-18 and the lots platted into conservation easements. Mr. Conant stated that they were adopted by Town Council because it used to be open space. All of the conditions are in various stages of completion, with some complete. Further, the conservation easements would have the same protection as Stone Canyon IV. The owners own the land; however,they cannot do anything with it. It will be monitored by an association. Charles Hulsey, The WLB Group, 4444 East Broadway, thanked the Board for moving this item to the end of the meeting. He described the area because it was rezoned. F:\Minutes\DRB\2004\5-20-04 Minutes.doc Approved on 7/13/04 8 4 5/20/2004 Development Review Board Minutes Page 9 Mr. Hulsey showed an overhead of the areas concerning Item 3 on Exhibit A. Some areas were undefined because they do not have a final study to show what is classified as wash area. They have permission from the County to construct some of the housing and a golf course. There are water agreements that have been signed for the golf course. MOTION: Member Weatherford MOVED to recommend Town Council approval OV 12-03-34, Stone Canyon VII Preliminary Plat Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 11, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit A. Member Reddin SECONDED the motion. Motion carried 5-0. STAFF REPORT Mr. Conant gave an update on Northwest Medical Center. The cabinets were installed. They plan to open February 2005. Forty-five percent of the offices have been leased and may open mid-December. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Member Weatherford MOVED to adjourn the May 20, 2004 Development Review Board Meeting Regular Session at 8:00 p.m. Member Reddin SECONDED the motion. Motion carried 5-0. Respectfully submitted by, 004/4444,4460 Recording Secretary, Catherine Hendrix F:\Minutes\DRB\2004\5-20-04 Minutes.doc Approved on 7/13/04 9 May 24, 2004 Stephen J. Cooper, AIA Mittelstaedt Cooper Associates, LTD. 4130 East Van Buren Street, Suite 200 Phoenix, AZ 85008 RE: OV 12-04-04 and OV 13-04-13, Bank of America at Safeway Vistoso Plaza, Development Plan, Landscape Plan and Architecture, Parcel 220-020- 340 Dear Steve: At the special meeting of May 20, 2004, the Development Review Board voted by a majority(5-0) to recommend conditional approval of the Development Plan for the above referenced project. The conditions are attached as Exhibit A. Due to time between the Development Review Board and Town Council meeting for this project the conditions of the DRB will be forwarded to the Town Council. The conditions will have to be addressed prior to staff certifying that the Development Plan is approved following Town Council action. The Development Review Board further approved the Landscape Plan and Architecture for this project the conditions of which are attached. No further action is required at this time. The conditions of approval for the landscape plan shall be addressed and a final Landscape Plan submittal for certification to staff. This project is scheduled for Town Council on June 16, 2004, 24 copies (11 X 17)need to be submittal by noon on June 1. It may be prudent to begin the public art design review process (brochure enclosed). One percent of the construction cost of the project must be allocated for onsite public art. We recommend that the applicant submit a public art proposal, including a cover letter, construction estimate, renderings of a proposed design, and an estimate of the total art cost, at the same time you submit for building permits. Planning staff will transmit copies of the aforementioned items to the Public Art Review Committee (PARC) for review and approval. In turn, PARC will provide a recommendation to the Town Council. The submittal must be made in time to allow the Town Council to approve the public art within 90 days of issuance of the building permit. The approved art must be completed and placed prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. At this point, you may submit grading, drainage and wastewater improvement plans for review. Plans for onsite, offsite, and utility improvements are required. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at (520) 229-4822. Very truly yours, Robert M. Conant, Jr. Planner II enclosures cc: Brent Sinclair, Community Development Director Bryant Nodine, Planning and Zoning Administrator Craig Civalier, Public Works Bob Jacklitch, OV Water Shirley Gay, Development Coordinator File CLAY TILE ROOF APR 1 2004 TO MATCH EXISTING-- GABLE FORM USED AT MAIN ENTRY AND REAR ELEVATION fillarniamiti arm STUCCO COLORS TO w ' i'Sfr:‘la "Oli1.01•0111.1....1.1•IM••• MATCH SHOPPING CENTER = STANDARDS _- — r Kio ----- -- - • a r.+.,.,,,, '' AMT 10.. . SYNTHETIC STONE VENEER . -4-,.°4° N, .1'1'-',- . . TO MATCH EXISTING ,� BankcAAFasTrica '�:«i� s Safeway Rancho Vistoso DO Vistoso Plaza s Oro Valley, Arizona Oro Valley, Arizona 41110 P.VAN RPM R.MTN WO /MO�1oG ARCM 00000 It 000.i JoNEs LANG LASALLE '' 111P, 11111” IIITINALLY ILUYWATO ''''1".• • ''' . HOW SO------, ; -r. At,'SIV'"'"All CIA.7 1.41'7.," . -.-7 S:IY°"‘"% ) •' \ Mai ' , , 1 .. 4$. STICX MESH OL4R MA DORT CANCPY- Ft:--,,1,i..,u `4?S:i..4L-,' IRMA COSISTAUCHOi— COLOR TO VATCV%RS-- .•1. . ,'„I 1:e7- *I'ilif..):•,47A.. ' - . . ,,•. '..,. - ''''.0•;'li.:!"'-' '' 1 . • . T:.::'1!':1641r.i. 11' . . , ... . ,w-. ,..'..;::::::: , ,, „I 7'7 '-.7 , krei :L. .1111141111.1111111111k __ .:691:1!:..;'.. . P Cp.,f•MHO L—DiHK-H9H) -LP ATV'. ',-Stfrf.-14:T.0 SINE L--All,, ill STOR01104T .-SINTREHC STOW (---&WNW STCPLTRONT ATV OH.TVA MEER TO UATCH SY,,•,'4 MUM VENEER TO MATCH SYSTRM ON*SLUED COSMO W.%(T1P.) [NSW CAS (TW.) A FRONT ELEVATION B SIDE ELEVATION ..„._.,_,.....,.....,.,__ . .. ... . .,____.. .., ._. .. St=CW.4 OAR C.A,,Ttf HOC,liT, I,''-", FRAC CNSTF43.71%....-•••\ IWO,EkS'N.o.••••\ ---- . 7.,`!.-,-1';',„..,-"." '-„Xti•,A,),,,,,,,. - - - , ''''' ..'.„.'4:''',.,',,E. •:; .,,... . . ,,,...,,'„.:1--`..:. i 110014 .P.PyillintlIni,1111,11111 ..'.''.,:ti*::: .. :,/,-.....,:*'...,7-;;'`' --,` ",...:..-;,,,, .y.T.,...r.::,. ,• ' , , ' _ ' ,. .. _ ..., -1,,..,,,,•;.;:i.,.,4,i,,, . ..,;:f.- ,ii,:,,,,4'- ...., .., , , . .,, . 0 7•,,' -',")',. _, ' ''. ,1 ag. - ..,..,. , ' 1 I 1 ,.....-.0.,-: . ::•. . .'" - I . .e.,.'it:'''.' -',1 1 , ,----- . lrgi t ii,„,,_ , , , marl?* ( k-SIVICIIC HMV -Cre4-116.1 L-ORAC-40,4) l''f'MO / \---DRAT-TWO Astra- WAFER TO VitTC:ti O.H.TUr. Atli .".Ote Pr:11,40-- CASING C REAR ELEVATION D SIDE ELEVATION '.'Cc•Zt.'"11.44;f- 1' Banicof America Safeway ..,--.. . -,,,m‘.,46. Rancho vistoso Vistoso Plaza JLIVIIIMOTTHHE a mutat., Oro Valley, Arizona .4p1 '› Oro Valley, Arizona MO.=MM 1...=.111LITM0. iit IMO MM.•IL OKA 0.11111 JONES LANG LASALLE ht,..--......,.. F dos INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED BANK SIGN INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED CLAY TILE ROOF TO STUCCO FINISH OVER BANK SIGN MATCH EXISTING FRAME CONSTRUCTION 4P/i) i STUCCO FINISH OVER ACM ENTRY CANOPY— ��� FRAME CONSTRUCTION COLOR TO MATCH SIGNS f \ ` --7 Bank C Arne --y o r o n W mc'ri +. IT 1 I I T l 1 I i ;�] .� I t /i / 71 1/' % '/ , ' %%' /j// _ _ \- / ' r , //, /// _ T tee® .�-; / `, �'—s f t= ii/ -.. / , iiie y - ` / J /� J / �� f—..v. 111. \ b'�� r-.7�! .77� 'if/ 77 1 -.:vb,.- -r Ste: IY' - ■ It U DRI —THRU SYNTHETIC STONE ALUMINUM STOREFRONT �--SYNTHETIC STONE L ALUMINUM STOREFRONT DRIVE—THR VE `IVALK—UP ATM's ATM O.H. TUBE VENEER TO MATCH SYSTEM WITH INSULATED VENEER TO MATCH SYSTEM WITH INSULATED EXISTING GLASS(TYP.) EXISTING GLASS(TYP.) �o A FRONT ELEVATION SIDE ELEVATION SCALE; 1/16'= 1'-0" Lir SCALE: 1/16"= 1'-0" STUCCO FINISH OVER CLAY TILE ROOF TO FRAME CONSTRUCTION MATCH EXISTING ♦ STUCCO FINISH OVER "r FRAME CONSTRUCTION i in L.... �j fi _ a i a Tn In r IL s O 1 .. I:, r, te" 13 '' ,........=-// c I 1--, h a 7\--SYNTHETIC STONE DRIVE—THRU DRIVE—THRU DRIVE—THRU DRIVE—THRU ATM's- VENEER TO MATCH 0.H. TUBE ATM WINDOW BEYOND EXISTING r REAR ELEVATION D SIDE ELEVATION SCALE; 1/16'= 1'-0" SCALE: 1/16' = 1'-0" MITTELSTAEDT ci a QOPER&� 0A ASSOCIATES Bank Eril©71-LICELTD. Safeway Rancho Vistoso Vistoso Plaza AR.,...„EcTu.o trITERIORS Oro Valley, Arizona Oro Valley, Arizona 4130 E.VAN WREN 3T,sunE 2D0 PHOENIX. AFIIZONA aeooe 2M-3 ' Ma JONES LANG LASALLE MtpJ/www.........dt oam 110'-7" r 37'-10" / 72'-9" ,,, 2'-6" / i, 11,-6„ / 12'-6" / 11'-4" , 17'-5„ / 6,-0„ / 36'-6„ / 6'-0" / 7'-4 / 0 O PIERS& GABLE ADDED ® 0 0 0' Q„.„9 FOR CONFORMANCE WITH SHOPPING CENTER DESIGNS \_ \ \ 0 — , _ 441 ,i __,,i Allit,, i , N3.___. - - J----V BOOTH ii'. o u _ \,______, MEN �N NER CALLING �-,'s I I I ilr� �� �� i-i II VAULT r-IN WOMEN -LINE OF r-- i�-� CANOPY ABOVE GO - r7,,,., r 1_ a DWI WINDOW 17 HAS u LO :Y I �1 ell . � _ BREAK — :��� o c� WI_ \ N \ �`/ — — ROOM I I' t VAULT ��PHOTO JAN. SIGN-IN pro -- \ CAD ' • — _ I .� ca _ - - i u - -- - - - - - _�,. PIERS & ARCADE ADDED cn ® �o 'r'r— `�` IJ FOR CONFORMANCE r `L7-- MEDIA WALL „.}.._______-- hi WITH SHOPPING �N \ DRIVE-UPI �II DRIVE-UPUE O 0 OFFICE I ��id CENTER DESIGN ANco JI� DI W/S II co an Ln-cm I , a, co 0 I Lc-) a G 0 �� DRIVE-THRU I TELLERS CO u U Ili `1 OFFICE I._ o E TELLERS N 11 ■ ■ \ (..! r np DRIVE-UP 1 I 1--I r CENTRAL ZONE ( ! �3 I I NIGHT I r, HOST DEPOSIT ' I❑ t_ �' `1 I rt-1 ❑ o`a HECK L OFFICE I ��� DRIVE-UP DRIVE-UP®a I "WORK 1 n WRITE r A \ ATM L J TUBE a s I ROOM u I I -is:, O a 0 pi 1 _ n a , 0 1 ■ = - CUD I • 1. cO I ` VIII k OFFICE \ T 11114SSIC �i I --- — — �— — — \ \ ...ter _ - N.. G '� I WALK-UP VESTIBULE DRIVE-THRU PIERS ENLARGED I ATMs I F PCNt;FORMAFC DESIGN -�4 1 �1��I -- 1 I L _ �� \J \ LINE OF STOREFRONT EXTENDED \ _ 24" TO ACCOMODATE PIERS ADDED " 4'-93' 38-4�" 4'_9 8-10 FOR CONFORMANCE WITH SHOPPING -6 11 -6 7( 12'-6" 11 -4' / 17-5 $ 7 / " / CENTER DESIGN 38'-10" / 74'-3„ / 113'-1" ❑ FL00� PLAN MITTELSTAEDT I� - COOPER 6z n SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-O" Safeway ❑ , 4 LTD. Vistoso Plaza Rancho Vistoso ARCMECTURE oINTERIORS Oro Valley, Arizona Oro Valley, Arizona 4130 E.VAN BUREN ST,SURE 200 PHCMNIN X. AZONA 85008 P:moo 215-3821• F.(002)273-1248 JONES LANG LASALLE httpx//ww w.mitEeleto adt.Dorn \.. _ \ \ PROPOSED EXISTING 1 r-- ` RETAIL�UILDING IN-LINE SHOPS— I 1 .- I - L J ( EXISTING /--\ \ \ , -, IN LINE SHOPS Al' ____ r , . -—J [ L �- P L i i ___1 \ ) . i -1 I I 4004. I/ ^ i r_ ,---1 ---,— ------ ---,--- I I)KNN pNN l I 0 08 - - ,-m 1 i 1f �kSHLTT 11-- n VETI�; i, I r u ., _LRECAAP, } ROP IEDI `-ExTsO Gyr 1S p 4,49 fffff _ ^ l' EXISTING , SAFFNAY i MI ' MILS, 11 . _ . - . _ [1] / 0 I _0 0 {'VE THRU� CC ® • a • ' ' =AT LANE ---NEASPHAL / T E E �, / -......,,„,„:".....____ _____ .____ AVING „ _____ / AL_ / / e -m\ -!-----1 w I ---, \--:=6"- IS rI ,.,, . i- PM l'A) I ). - . . - / TI - / / F 1 I rill„ , f EXISTING �� � \ 44, \ y„/„„ IN-LINE SHOPS Safeway -Q , , .... ,, „,„ 4: Vistoso Plaza i y lr--.___ J Oro Valley, Arizona ,. % v i ' SCALE: l'-o" _ 1 ao'-o" <\\<\ 1 I C�oOP��&CDT ASS°smATES Bankora -� a SafewaLTD. Vistoso Plaza Rancho Vistoso '.. > Oro Valley, Arizona (�FPtrt�JITEGTI.�,-?fE o iN1fEG��S 4t3E VAN OMEN ST,METE 200 Oro Valley, Arizona ,Ft,ZONI,, 8.611011 `802)27 '• Ft ceps 'z'e JONES LANG LASALLE http:/,www.mltt&t .... m