The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutOV131105 oQOP�1.EYggi�o2-v At\WTA °UNDED 191 A DEV REVIEW BOARD COMMERCIAL Resubmittal? N Development Review Transmittal Town of Oro Valley Planning and Zoning Division 11000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley,AZ 85737 Review Agency: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Transmittal Out: Friday, February 18, 2011 Transmittal Due: Friday, March 18, 2011 Project Information INREVU Project Number: OV1311-05 Parcel Number: 22424009U Project Title: COLOR CHANGE Lots (if applies): Location: LA CANADA&NARANJA Applicant: CHOI W J LLC Phone: 520-877-7767 Zoning: Oro Valley Planner: Date Information (as applies) DRB Hearing: 2nd DRB Hearing: Additional Comments: Written comments need to be returned to Development Coordinator, Shirley Gay. If you have no comments,please sign and date this form, and return it via FAX(520) 742-1022. For questions or comments, call (520) 229-4849, (520) 229-4816 or email sgay@orovalley.net. Friday, February 18,2011 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Approved Without Comments By: Date: o ,PLLEY M , � 5 20W atfr °UNDED'01 Planning &Zoning Division 11000 N. La Canada Drive, Oro Valley AZ 85737 Phone: (520) 229-4800 Fax: (520) 742-1022 www.orovalleyaz.gov APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROJECT ARCHITECTURE DATE: t.S' k\ OV CASE NO.: MTh (office use only) PROJECT NAME : SUBDIVISION LOT# LOCATION I ADDRESS: City St Zip ZONING PARCEL NUMBER: LOT SIZE REASON FOR SUBMITTAL: .M..-_ .. .. , ��-,.{..-,. . -- --..... .... I ,I APPLICANT: W - Chi i -ae 1Ct,.�c�,,c1I ci ( .A1>4 \l c�ti� �e 14 A f ADDRESS: I( I 3 3 1\1. Le„ e,Kt_etc, (7\-. City 0kZ1 V_ 7 11r St A2. Zip ?'l 3 7 PHONE NO.: 5?-‘' - 1 161 FAX NO.: 5?-' ' 7 1 1`1 c Email address: 0YvV4-Iley �5&c&+- . ('ow( PROPERTY OWNER: kiJ i . Cho ADDRESS: /°' ?3 N. ?aa(( U City 0)7) V6-(( St A z. Zip 877 31 PHONE NO.: 5 Xi - 1 161 FAX NO: �)4' SIGNATURE: ----- - - DATE: ' - ' � I Submittal Requirements: - Fees :One copy of 24x36 elevations and floor plan 1/4 or 1/8 scale :One copy of 24x36 site plan 40 scale(Custom Lots Only) :Typical lot lay out for subdivision :Models-Lot fit analysis for subdivisions :Electronic submittal in CAD or shp format or pdf form of submittal materials. Submittal will not be accepted without the disk. Eighteen(18)copies of the following: Dimensioned Elevations of all four sides of all buildings and floor plan(11"x 17"format) Elevation sheet must show wall for screening mechanical equipment List square footage of buildings Site Plan(11"x 17"format) Color chips of body,trim and roof tiles(81/2"by 11"format)Commercial and Residential this may be included with the elevations if you chose to do so. • Applications will not be accepted without all required materials. • PLEASE COLLATE AND FOLD SUBMITTAL DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FEE SCHEDULE REVISED JANUARY 21, 2009 GENERAL POLICIES FOR ALL APPLICATIONS As specified in the OVZCR, all fees must be paid in full prior to acceptance of an application. Fees identified after submittal are due as determined by the Planning and Zoning Director (Public Works Director for rights-of-way fees). All fees must be paid prior to the issuance of permits and/or release of assurances. Bond release inspections may be deducted from the appropriate bond if this is part of the language of the bond. Charges for partial review of any project will be based on the stage of review and staff time already dedicated to the project. The Planning and Zoning Director may refund up to 80% of the fee. The Planning & Zoning Director may waive fees if an undue hardship has been created by the Town. All other fee waiver requests must be approved by the Town Council. Fees will not be applied to applications or events initiated or sponsored by the Planning & Zoning Commission or Town Council. GIS fees are charged per development project. For example, GIS fees charged for a rezoning would be credited toward the GIS fees specified for a related development plan and/or plat. Whenever independent consultant review is provided for in the OVZCR (Golf Course Overlay, Communications facilities, Riparian analysis etc.), the applicant must reimburse the Town for all consultant fees incurred. Fees related to Development Review Board (DRB) DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD FEES Model Homes(first model) $220 ,"dchtionai Mace s S 100 per mode Custom Homes.General Architecture,Additions $220 Commercial Architecture(first building pad) $270 A.dditionai Building Pads $1 00 per build=rqg pad Grading Exception $1,300 Phased Grading Plan Included in Plat or Plan Submittal See the Development Services fee schedule for a complete list of fees. 1 - TOWN OF ORO VALLEY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING DATE: April 12, 2011 TO: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD FROM: David Ronquillo, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Architectural exterior color change for the existing ATA Blackbelt Academy building, located at 11133 N. La Canada Drive, represented by W. J. Choi, OV1311-05. SUMMARY: The Development Review Board (DRB) is required to review color change and alterations to commercial architecture. There are five existing buildings within the larger commercial center. Two of the buildings are located within this portion of the parcel. The ATA Blackbelt Academy building located on the east side of parcel is the only building to be repainted. The existing building is currently painted a pink tone and is proposed to be repainted darker brown and tan shades. The other building on this same parcel will remain the same. Site Conditions • Property is 1.05 acres • Zoning is El Conquistador Planned Area Development (PAD) Commercial • Two existing buildings totaling 9,600 square feet located at 11133 and 11143 N. La Canada Drive. Proposed Improvements The applicant has submitted two options for color palettes for DRB review and consideration: 1. Building colors: a. "Strata color" (#1257D) for pop-outs, tower and fascia b. "Verdant color" (#1262W) for sign band and walkways c. "Tephra color" (#2356D) for tower top and archway 2. Building colors: a. "Old Washer color" (#2902W) for pop-outs, walkways, tower top and archway b. "Sephia color" (#2687N) for fascia c. "Pinesap color" (#2915D) for sign band d. "Dingo color" (#2744D) for tower BACKGROUND: Approvals to Date • August 2001: Development Review Board approval of architectural elevations and colors. • September 2001: Town Council approval of Development Plan. ANALYSIS OF OVZCR SECTION 22.6.B - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CRITERIA: The following is a list of noteworthy criteria (in italics) followed by staff commentary. Section 22.6, DRB Review Criteria TOWN OF ORO VALLEY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Page 2 of 2 • Chapter 22.6.B. 6, "The character of the proposed design shall be in harmony with, and compatible to, those structures in the neighboring environment and the design character adopted for any given area avoiding excessive variety or monotonous repetition." The existing building color is pink in tone. Both proposed color schemes provide muted earth tones that are more compatible with the adjacent buildings. • Chapter 22.6.B.10, "All exterior materials and colors including roofs, walls and fences shall be predominantly muted earth and plant tones and shall minimize contrast and glare." The exterior colors will blend well with the surrounding environment. All the proposed colors meet the required 60% reflectivity. The proposed color shade will be consistent with the building to the north which has darker tones; however, the adjacent buildings to the west and south are pink with brighter tones. In general, there will be a difference between the building colors in the commercial center. The proposed darker and muted colors are preferred and will be more consistent with the surrounding area. Addendum A Design Guidelines • Addendum A, Design Guidelines, C.2.a(iv): Use materials and colors that minimize heat absorption without reflecting. The proposed earth tone colors help minimize building glare and reflectivity. The use of brown and tan colors blend with the adjacent buildings. CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION: The architectural color revisions are in conformance with the Zoning Code and Design Guidelines. The proposed colors are compatible with the existing buildings and surrounding area. Staff recommends approval of either color palette#1 or#2 for this building. Both are compatible in the commercial center. SUGGESTED MOTION: The DRB may wish to consider one of the following suggested motions: I move to [approve, approve with conditions, OR deny], architectural color changes for the existing building. Attachments: 1. Building Photo with existing colors 2. Elevations and color palette#1 and #2 3. Site Plan cc: Hyong Kim, ATA Blackbelt Project Manager: David Ronquillo, Senior Planner / Dab I:Williams, PlanningDivision Manager ager t 1 m , " x P ,-t k 1,\.* Convex'Group .. ,, , i i y y t t .1, 11114111/1t --- 1111 a ' v , , , 4 41111 I I 4' I fa i .., 1 1 ! S ., . C)rrtrunal Olin++. 11133 Building Tucson ii (Viani-iqpniinnt John Roether sales.Reprecentritive Frazee Paint ,P0 u bile:520-940-0394 roether@frazee.rotn Color Wheel Paint General Paint Razee Paint Parker Paint )(limed Paint Canso( r...,,,,„.„,,ritii*tierurieuetio tr IS+,bmix*Iire 4+e roorAms"+++vmr,C4041 Irffy..Aatio'ciaiiir*IP be v Or?t1,04,eV teittire.ftiirlath-ciinditiciiii*, 41Abettlitiesi,fteri1/424i 0.1'nAviktitr)Vtilit*rttiV -I et:+tritium a ti arititi eixt.J11 rthut at!beyorkilhe i iiv„ii Lit,al CaottleoutAp.44iiirii a**ithkott1/41o1 tr,leo tho 41,(41,tootrux rtie0 ottodar i 04104,7.1 by the ile'yOrolitf Linder a.tiu*lioti esineitio-u, Scherer*1 Comex"Gre:oup D3 21,2011 • „ L t F 41k ft po tit „0,4.0•0 404,6 100 4ier 400,sok^ Am, _ . • • " .4 , • '• , Sign Band and Walkways Pop nuts artdrOWel and Fa5cia.CIC 1200 Strata Tow,tr Top and A t< ay t.,:LC I oQ iepn- 11133 Building Tucson I P,'II 1 I Color Wheel mint Gellifiral Paint Frtnee Paint PaticierPviint golistaiPgshit Cornet wurtsi thn nrcletticr appiracrl Ill',(dims nosy titrtit0 mitif i1ito! dut re)Pierfarf,44144,tor 4orteetform condAit mettInd oirppt*iitirAtArrY,tvoil Aeretryclori and wher"two%OW.titf 430;104 ritte‹.,14 reu444(ctifile,Gevutp,fvtol Euivr vek into/Joe maul.A UM fichratowila r 447,00,11 by Itktroofifoiff* i4 ritia Comilttoott . . Set'leave,2„ awrieiltGist7oup .,,-. .., _......,...._...,:_ .._. ., -...,,.. ..,..._.„,..,,....,, „........,..,,,......,,.._ . , , .,...,.. „.., , . W '''''.". "....'''''' ''''''' .' '"". '''r.1..ra'.. '''''''''''' ';''''';* T--7 7 7 , -•, : • . ,,_ .., ,• : . , r,_,:,. .. . _,. •.L ,,,Rief • IP"t''' "i'fr ."'"' .'"wr"'''.*''' 1'-'-'-''" ,-,--,.*---------.-','-----",''''''-''''"'"--,--""':', .;., f-r,- '-' '1 '- 1 - -- ....:-......_....... '..... -- ° - ....,.., „, .,.. .,„., ,............„..... „.. -.. „ 1 , , . . , ., . ,., ........" • r ......... L. .. ..,, . . .......-.. , , i , '.L. ' ---''T ::t 1•:''•:"A ' ' : .:Iri'''''''r'''' '-''':' . 4' •I 1 '.'' .', ,'''' : ..1 4•,‘•e ..i.-....., . , ..., .,:. ,-., . -a ,..,.....„.„,,,.,.....,..,.... , I •. . °,, -li . ,,, . ::;°:,,--. .,, °°, ,7---,,,-:,-7:-7.,,,-::,-:'„,• . ,.... • ..,., '''',4:V;''''.:"''-',.:' ",,,,- , , _,, ,. . 'r:[..,....'.,...,--,.-:',.•-.,,,„ ,,, Sign Band CL 29;•••SD Pinesap Walle,h,---ays and Pppouts a nci,Tower. 7,'"i7.o. _!,,a,,ri<1,A Tchway:CL 2c.10021/ii k...,'Ild Washer 'rover 744D 1.,)Intijo F 4C4:100:( ( )(44, 74 ,I.I " 11133 Bui1ding Tucson .,, ,... ciit t. Color Wheel Paint. General Paint Frazee Paint f)tli*Vitty Paint Klivai Paint Cams* PV#ref VW tilY0Y-1*,,%419044410eleilt AM tto,m briX"ol.dre 4 4 ,,,Mq..),Xf--e,t.4,10101'1, t.mtv144-1,*45.ord tairkt ktrews ri A*in letitt oa, frJrkiA'o $, that " lezrciY Pmkr teo mt ttvci w f,twthrive,iteorletkap,(p4rie174;t1ierocomlVft.00,,o,9 SiteFo 1 /sa) ‘1' an , ems„,.r 7.7 !jsjSSF,= _ }t_ . •r a I- 1` .r - 111, 4V al- e.Y.. a I .,, ) ..i :' .„. tr. ' :' 7- . •�� .- 1 '. 4 f'' ly. • • { 1 ,. ■ y , o 5 • z 44 �t 1 . .. -. ti - ; 4 1 _ .9, rip . . _.....11„ _., ,_ ,, .; .. ` ` ,z 1L, ... i eS r; We--',ft 4` Altkr;:, -: .,-,-7. ....._2__. girt a' I F*iii- s -- . t IL " . - , . . , A iau. e I''' k