Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOV30403A • ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Jeff Weir, Economic Development Bayer Vella, Principal Planner Dee Widero, Senior Zoning Inspector Mary Caswell, DRB Chairperson Dan Sturmon, DRB Member John Buette, DRB Member FROM: Jonathan Lew, Planning Technician DATE: December 19, 2005 LOCATION: Apache Room, Community Development Building RE: Development Review Board Sub-Committee on Sign Agenda for Tuesday, January 3, 2006 4:00 PM OV3-04-03A, John Picooli, representing CTW-Oro Valley, LLC., requests • approval to amend the sign criteria for Placita De Oro Plaza, located at the Southwest corner of Tangerine Road and First Avenue, Parcel # 224-02-170A. The applicant's proposes to allow a tenant with more than 12,000 square feet to have a wall sign with a maximum letter height from 48 inches to 61 inches. 4:30 PM Adjourn TRANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT TIME : 01/05/2006 15: 22 NAME : FAX . TEL . ` DATE,TIME 01/05 15: 21 FAX NO. /NAME 8826709 DURATION 00:00: 23 PAGE(S) 03 RESULT OK MODE STANDARD ECM TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Phone: ( 20) 229-4800 Community Development Fax: (520) 742-1022 • tM 1 11000 N. LaCanada Dr. Oro Valley, AZ 857-37 To: /—A. ° Sf - 10*1 � •Phone =ta Fax: __ ------_ - - . r Fran,: 1°M17 ..; --_ - - - • Pages Including Cover: Date: V.5745_ - �•i Regarding: O1 t/ Lte--4 t ' i► P�uEY qR, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY o ?oti COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Osu. Planning and Zoning•Building Safety 11000 N.La Canada Drive,Oro Valley,AZ 85737.(520)229-4800•Fax(520)742-1022 -1 Oro Valley Public Library A A 1305 W.Naranja Drive,Oro Valley,AZ 85737•(520)229-5300•Fax(520)229-5319 Parks and Recreation '(F .. 680 W.Calle Concordia,Oro Valley,AZ 85737•(520)229-5050•Fax(520)797-2202 UNDED g� January 5, 2006 John Picooli 6341 N. Placita De Eduardo Tucson, AZ 85718 RE: OV3-04-03A, John Piccoli, representing Ace Hardware Inc, requests approval to amend the sign criteria for Placita De Oro Plaza, located at the Southwest corner of Tangerine Road and First Avenue, Parcel # 224-02-170A. Dear John, The Development Review Board Sub Committee on Signs met on January 3, 2005 to discuss your request. Present at the meeting were: John Piccoli, Applicant Ann Piccoli, Applicant Rusty Talm, Ace Hardware Inc. Andy Stash, Flouresco Lighting and Sign Company John Buette, DRB Member Dan Sturmon, DRB Vice Chairman Jonathan Lew, Planning Technician The following comments were presented by the DRB members: • The design appears good. • Wanted to see more contrast between the 4 foot wall sign and the proposed 5 foot wall sign. Please submit 28 copies of your submittal to the Town's Development Coordination team by noon of January 12, 2006. Your submittal will then be scheduled for the February 14 DRB meeting. www.townoforovalley.com • If you have any questions regarding your submittal, please feel free to contact me at 229- 4853 or at flew@)orovalley.net. Sincerely, ��RR Jonathan Lew Planning Technician CC: Shirley Gay, Development Coordinator Dee Widero, Senior Zoning Inspector Bayer Vella, Principal Planner Andy Stash, Flouresco Lighting and Sign(882-6709 Fax) Page 1of1 Gay, Shirley From: Lew, Johnathan Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 2:02 PM To: Moran, Debbie; Gay, Shirley Subject: FW: DRB meeting i on March 14th not the 16th Revised email for OV3-04-03A Original Message From: john piccoli [mailto:ovacehardware@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 2:00 PM To: Kevin Hilde; Lew, Johnathan; Anthony Noto; Robert Palm; Andy Stash; Cheyenne Welles Subject: DRB meeting i on March 14th not the 16th To all, By mistake I thought that the March Oro Valley DRB meeting was on the 16th. It is going to be held on Tuesday March 14th. I will be there. John John & Anne Piccoli Owners Oro Valley Ace Hardware (opening in mid 2006) Home phone (520) 531-8248 Yahoo! Photos— Showcase holiday pictures in hardcover Photo Books. You design it and we'll bind it! This E-mail has been scanned by McAfee WebShield. Any infected attachments associated with this E-mail have either been deleted or cleaned. --Town of Oro Valley Information Technology Division 01/24/2006 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY STAFF REPORT TO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING DATE: MARCH 14, 2006 TO: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD FROM: Jonathan Lew, Planning Technician SUBJECT: OV3-04-03A, John Piccoli, representing Ace Hardware Inc, requests approval to amend the sign criteria for Placita De Oro Plaza, located at the Southwest corner of Tangerine Road and First Avenue, Parcel #224-02-170A. BACKGROUND: The Placita De Oro Plaza development plan was approved by Town Council on November 2000. Currently, Walgreens and Wells Fargo are the only tenants on the site. The site has a total area of 11.18 acres. On May 20, 2004, the Development Review Board approved a sign criteria for the plaza. The sign criteria includes the following noteworthy items: 1. Color Pallete: a. Copper Patina or Mission Patina b. Black Anodic(41-335) c. White acrylic (015) d. Dark Bronze (41-313) 2. Halo Illumination using white neon, white or amber LED 3. Sign area is determined by the Chapter 28 of the OVZCR. Currently the OVZCR restricts the size of wall sign as follows: a. Tenants within 300 feet from the street are permitted 1 square foot of signage per linear foot of building frontage, not to exceed a maximum of 150 square feet. b. Tenants with building elevations greater than 300 feet from the street are permitted 1.5 square feet of signage per linear foot of building frontage, not to exceed a maximum of 200 square feet. 4. Maximum size of logos is limited to 8 square feet. 5. Overall height of any letter or logo is restricted as follows: a. Leased area up to 2,000 square feet: 24"maximum letter height b. Leased area 2,001 —6,000 square feet: 36"maximum letter height c. Leased area 6,001+ square feet: 48"maximum letter height Please note, the OVZCR does not limit maximum letter height. The total area is regulated. APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL: The applicant has proposed an increase of the maximum letter height permitted to 61" for tenants with more than 12,001 square feet of tenant space. The proposal also maintains the approved color palette of copper patina. DRB SIGN SUB-COMMITTEE MEETING The DRB Sub-Committee on Signs met on January 3, 2006 to discuss the applicant's submittal. The Board members complimented the applicant for using the copper patina color and requested to see more contrast between renditions of the allowed 4-foot wall sign and the proposed 5-foot wall sign. The applicant has resubmitted showing requested contrast. i ^ TOWN OF ORO VALLEY STAFF REPORT TO THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Page 2 CHAPTER 22.6B, CRITERIA: In considering any application, the Development Review Board shall be guided by the following criteria: The proposed design shall promote a desirable relationship of structures to one another, to open spaces and topography both on the site and in the surrounding areas: Internal Compatibility The applicant's proposal includes the use of a Copper Patina wall sign with white halo illumination, which is the same as Walgreens and Wells Fargo. The difference is the height of the wall sign. As depicted in the attached site plan, the proposed Ace Hardware is positioned 500 feet from Tangerine Road and 500 feet from 1st Avenue. The applicant asserts that this distance warrants a larger wall sign than currently permitted in the existing sign criteria. Furthermore, the smaller buildings (<12,000 square feet) that are positioned closer to the roads wan-ant a smaller sign size as they have more direct visibility from the street. The proposal has merit as Ace Hardware will be the anchor tenant and positioned furthest away from the roads. The increased letter height should further be restricted to one anchor tenant at the rear of the site. It is feasible that the layout could be reconfigured in the future and additional future structures in excess of 12,001 square feet could be developed on this site. This could result in excessive signage and minimize the advantage that an anchor tenant and its customers generally seek as a reference Safeway is a nearby anchor tenant and the sign wall sign is 7 feet in height. A condition has been added to Exhibit A to address this concern. To help insure internal capability, the sign criteria should specify a restriction to allow only white halo illumination. The criteria should also eliminate the use of cabinet type signs. Both measures would mandate consistency with existing development of the site. Conditions have been added to Exhibit A. The character of the proposed design shall be in harmony with, and compatible to, those structures and signs in the neighboring environment and the design character adopted for any given area avoiding excessive variety or monotonous repetition: External Compatibility The area surrounding the Placita De Oro Plaza is predominately residential. The Safeway Vistoso Plaza is located on the Northwest corner of First Avenue and Tangerine Road. The maximum letter height for non- anchor tenants is 4 feet. The anchor tenant, Safeway, has wall sign that is 7 feet in overall height. The applicant's proposal would mimic the existing effect and size organization within the Safeway Vistoso Plaza. Signs, ingress, egress, internal traffic circulation, off-street parking facilities, loading and service areas and pedestrian ways shall be so designed as to promote safety and convenience: Location, colors and illumination has been restricted in a manner to provide safety, proper visibility and convenience in regards to flow of traffic. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY STAFF REPORT TO THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Page 3 In order to protect the visual serenity of the Town, design of signage should be based on trying to get information across with the least signage possible: The proposed increase in letter height does not meet this guideline; however, the impact of the increased letter height is mitigated by keeping the maximum allowable sign area to 1 % feet of signage per linear feet of building frontage. Signage could further be limited as previously specified. Sign designs shall be in compliance with the purpose statements established in Section 28.1.A: All components shall be in compliance with Addendum A, Design Guidelines: Addendum A, Design Guidelines are written to reflect the purpose statements in Chapter 28, Signs. Both areas of the code address uniqueness, character, compatibility and the use of materials and colors that appear natural to the environment and surrounding community. These issues have been previously discussed. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the revision to the Placita De Oro Sign Criteria. The proposal conforms to the OVZCR requirements, General Plan, and all but one design guideline specification. SUGGESTED MOTIONS: I move to [approve, approve with conditions, OR deny] OV3-04-03A, Revision to the Placita De Oro Sign Criteria. Staff recommends that any motion to approve be subject to the conditions specified in Exhibit A. Attachments: 1. Exhibit A 2. Site Plan Planning and'Zoning Administrator 3. Applicant's proposal Cc: Andy Stash, Flouresco Lighting and Signs, 882-6709 (Fax) F:\OV\OV3\2004\OV3-04-3A\DRB Report.doc t EXHIBIT A OV3-04-03A SIGN CRITERIA FOR PLACITA DE ORO (REVISION) 1. Only the Ace Hardware use and pad may utilize a 61"maximum letter height. 2. Add the following statement to reflect OVZCR requirements, "Tenants with wall frontages within 300 feet from a main street may have 1 square feet of signage per linear foot of building frontage, not to exceed a maximum of sign area of 150 square feet. Tenants with wall frontages more than 300 feet from a main street may have 1 V2 square feet of signage per linear foot of building frontage, not to exceed a maximum of 200 square feet." 3. All wall signs shall utilize white halo illumination. 4. No cabinet signs shall be permitted on wall signs. 5. The applicant is to submit a revised sign criteria that incorporates the condition listed in Exhibit A within 30 days of DRB approval. FD I i `NiE - - .. - 1 I ! ., . Stantec Consulting Inc. RO '1 R g - - -- t�w\rl j�R /"- ,,-` `sue' ,.�s• 8211 South 48th Street t -T P I I 1 " �' Phoenix AZ USA �7 I NE CORNER ; t. . Tel. 6 85044-5355 _ _ i — / f Tel. 602.438.2200 € — - -- — - - — — _ N89'57'55"W(B� N89'54'6R"W(M} 5N7.66' I SECTION 1 ' Fox. 602.431.9562 i ce' 4494.40'/"� - - " 773.00'(R) 773.20'N) — i FND 2"BRASS CAP a '" t _ ` i ( t: - rwwstantec.com _ L NW CORNER rt --- -•- - E, TANGERINE ROAR E5 ''o I StanfieC € - — - - - w wad R=25A0'R&M I 1 „-. SECTION 1 — �g— % (DKT.4781,PG.267,P.C.R.) a a n ( ' 1 1 I Copyright Reserved f FND 2'BRASS CAP b wi *'•� f• ; o N L=,39.33'(R)39.30'(M) ! r . t $ � N89'S7'S5lY(R) I , Tan=25,05'(R)25.03(M) � The Contractor shall verify and to s or omissions for all a dimensions.DC 1 NOT scale the drawin an errors or omissions shop be reported i I in n g f ! 1 •$._ Stantec rights to Inc.without delay 672.94'(R) a •D=90'07'551R)90'04'021() f{ The Copyrights to all designs and drawings are the property of 10'TELEPHONE EASErAENT N89'54'02 W(M) • ^ Y { I 673.17•(M) m�' Stantec Consulting Inc.Reproduction or use for other than PER DK 11843, PG 1516 1 f 1 that authorised by Stantec Consulting Inc.is forbidden g ���. ' �- RC -———--- SF4Sa r^_ +_fie i;—— ----- - - -- I s, 9 't __ 120 60 e S _ 6.1E'_ •N LT- 1, n 1 n T I I , ;I �1 M � , -� -i n r r—ii r r i I-Z II I � 1 I I I I I I , , I I I 'I I ' I i t 1 1 — �`�—� ! i I i ! ! l�' I I I IW �1 ; i I I I i' 1 gw `' I mm �{ 2 I r V1 c t I I : Ii t ,y ILOT 31 a W b 1 1•':'.- -il I f 1�� ;� I ��, r- ( >, .�` ��f 1i 1 I I I I i�t� 1 I ��i I� �/I 3 , ,,; 1 ° / I — `-1 i 1_ J� L_� _L� _�Y_i—ta l pik.t _n ' 1 ii< -1_ --i_il 1-1J '; '��!I - -1 W S 1I- I .-. u; i 5 f c�"' �-- -- t•`^'•'._ Ma'•:., uN »I -L -L _-^r_�- ��` I — -1 r - I D r r— �� r ti I • . •t, n'--j Z_1'_J L Li I I _:J J f �i _ _I I es''''�N: tC- - i r_ 3 - - 1 }i av � a _. Y. �1E- i If • ' z / E.- - 1 a c"c>> _ yyq .R 1 i 1( d 50 d L 1 i - LU - < t / 8 ` ® o- it w .I - ;I . r `,a\ I' EA'7 E t T 11 !i ;,w �G,'l�3 b E ;N - - I \\ o\ 7 't _ 11 —II —a • I fil I r ! Q fi I I i'`j rl�f'� g i H �� i II I 11 1 ~ Ir a, - I 1 WELLS FARGO z .�r d -1 1` - EXISTING' i I!E I __II r 6 1 ;. m I W e� I-' I t I I - i e. I - - f i i 1 ` a WALGREEN'S�FiE >'tt' iS- j =_1K I I E. I I I I " 41 f 25 - -' l 1i'� _ r1 t ; I a ma y- zw l'L I - N 4 -- - .t CJLI I, .- 7,I + - 1 I F- I gg� "r � J e n 1 1 ~ l,f•t.eL'• u s. I `-- � i 1 7O i i '§�i g — _ - ---. 11 - L E jr------ — -- _ _ _I - o a / o N p' 1 10' TgLE�HONE EAST ENT''',,,1 I '-. f-�_ __$'1 if ! I -- - --- / 11 - P_E' -111$4. P 516_L---�=7"y I ,!I' ! I I i i -,�,a o trill ■ ; I 1 PUBLIC LEfTRTCMENT 75'R/W PER I I o RC se9 g4"'-- , 242.58' RC T Lt_ l'/:E II , T------- - ------- PE DKT.184 3, PG-1-0 MA. s ( I n BK.33 OF MAPS 11 t m il z r nu-a —I— — — - fi �I# 1 1 - j I &PLATS,PC.30, j I `� i, ! , 16 ; I 1I t �2° .,lq=I~�; e ' '�r•T 11 I I I I I i I 1 1 I 1 — .F 1--1—ci 1 i I . I N89'S7'S 107.50' N89�57 55 W� 147.08' -' ( @'�1-! i' 1 t r 'R 1 f i 1 Nt3`J J4 JJ W, ( 1J48 1(>. '" ,<a,yi • �.� •"r 14 is :'y�v33:=1i'' RC / 'y``i�* 11 -*� j n . -�_ �_-_ J / ` ,- Si9� 'm 'R. a.s . 50 3<"E ,.-F9'; s .9'S4d J . z r wF"a nv`l ' •' y R .r t 41 N VF. 134:3f k is r _ 83.ar9 R v e 3 _ `_ - /� (S C }{.i, ■ N8 57'55"w • y3. 70 L17` 1 i + •` g �I �r89'S6 0TW —1�Z.b�———— ——� °' VA • a. _ L76 I 1 N I tf i_. - — — — - tl' 3 T - E, MENT I �- cn I �. AiliN PIORTH J Q I �I — — — �,' L14-1 I t\ _ II �, 3 �' 7 0 0 S.F. J F N 1Cr-Etf�TRIC-�4 I t1t i - r e �.t 24 z M' ' "` g r FF=2776.03 '� -_ C ` PER DK". 11792, ' k 87 I - N 11 i d E w Q N f Jno0'OG'W I 7, 1111 - ••' fa N_ — i • .,.7. ILO".21 ' ■N{1 1 �� 'IE t, I - I. IN i z ilt. as !ii I llLl ! t r� W a - 1--r7 g _ _ ,tj WATER :, 'j - — " n i w -{ L rQ a o C _ Y• I _ELEMENT i' ( j, i� �' -[I I i 1 c i p0 g I I I \ SHOPS A I) 1 -'L5 TER I i I I^`IFi" a — 0 40' 80 120' m o ` �`y 9,100 S.F. { t I �c ER to rr � tttt� tttttt■ _ jil1 GARDEN \ r �^,/'\N \ -F 2Z7Q.30 1 -€A NT I j Cr Zi.- Si,CI 1' =40' . CENTER ./ I p 5,000 S.F. % �- Sao - --_ w \ I N 1 , LT l' ——— I t 5,000 S.F. , �� S : I — 2 I. _ o �s I -- III 1gg tso'BSL FF=2775.36 \ 9\o�\ \ o=,�� 1' ¢ ——— �: . try--! I V I I I1}5: ° z' I- ILOT ` i\\. \ N180'00'00 l '. BSL ! — t ' I '� J /• r\\ ..% --' '71_— • _j1_ 9'B. T. 14 I i I I Revision BY APPd. Dr . i / i 10 ---�,\ Z [ ' II I &'�� ''° WER I , I Dwn. ChYd. Dagn. Dr i \, , I ,4 ei I\\�o�, SEME? Permit/Seal / I �l�` MAJOR A , 1 ,, I \ �\ 4.N89'S6'07"W g I'. . . 16,000 S.F. ` • • ta�7Q__jJ .23 FF- SHOPS C r. ' ' -- d.`� 7., r ,,`• .,�" 2775.36 4,200 S.F. -� I r `, rr, ' ! • FF J1774.69 I �,�<v� �o r+ > :as b 1 Nil R. ( 2YOU OrC :. o I 1 s72 0 \ q _ • —• I - I 1 STEFFENHAGEN BEFORE rrn,oro �r r, HOO-STAKE s " _ ` SHOP S B ire - - . (gE) I � ,', ` I i s Y \"`;\'1i �� 6,550 S.F. I _Elie �^ _T'�- 4 )atifi'to..a`- 1 ! NOTE qAi •�1 P. • \ \ o-•. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO THE FACE OF 2oNAus \oil Q �� • I I -■did , !3rr09 a�Ei I 141 ' ' I CUR 111 �i`/' ?� • 46• �'�`" ,,,` — — — - — "'4R.sz e.„;i� I B, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, -�- --- \ , i j '1 \\ �1,,` � �� '1. i I _t- .•I 1: ice--` ..• ` r� �rilrilr,• 1 I 1 zrt;.xn CIIenUPrOject `. 11 WIN i ! _ +oi.9f! 1 11 I ., ,�•'.1 -mot CTW RETAIL PARTNERS,L.L.C, Ii 'i'T,` 8098 N.VIA DE NEGOCIA,SUITE 100 I\ M89'56'071.1 _...___.-._._-.- 412.67' - '- --- - y,c5N i a'+ :'. TTSDALE.ARIZONA 85258 i SCO 3 y -- I `` I to Phone:(4801947-8800 • \ l I I I I ! 1 , ORO VALLEY RETAIL CENTER I I I '--�1 r----1.;Ire I < SWC N. FIRST AVE. &TANGERINE ROAD m '1 SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 12S, RANGE 13E u�i ' I 1 I ! - ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA 22 ; . { ' I ! • Title • I 248 54'2Y! r PRELIMINARY PLAT AND J t9eDr elzsi DEVELOPMENT PLAN FND 1/2" REBAR • Nss•s.rc w;sr / 6.982o•r,2 I \LS #26047 ! FND 1 2 REBAR 4. 10 E 1/4 CpiRNER m ';' CONTOUR INTERVAL: 1' 1 1 TANGERINE HILLS 1 SECTION rt �a BOOK 31 OF MAPS AND PLATS FND 2' Project No. Scale PAGE 51 / BRASS CAP �_ eif 181505045 1"=40` 03/i6/05 s f <' Drawing No, Sheet Revision oho qR/202v 14k -ow ► °UNDED A91 DEV REVIEW - SIGN SUBMIT SIGN CRITERIA Resubmittal? N Development Review Transmittal Town of Oro Valley Planning and Zoning Division 11000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley,AZ 85737 Review Agency: OV ZONING COMPL-JON LEW Transmittal Out: Monday, January 09, 2006 Transmittal Due Thursday, February 02, 2006 Project Information Project Number: OV304-003A Parcel Number: 22402170A Project Title: AMENDMENT TO SIGN CRITERIA Lots (if applies): Location: 1ST AVE AND TANGERINE ROAD Applicant: JOHN S PICCOLI Phone: 520-531-8248 Zoning: C-2 Oro Valley Planner: JON LEW Date Information (as applies) DRB SubCommittee: DRB Hearing: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 TC Hearing: Additional Comments: Written comments need to be returned to Development Coordinator. If you have no comments,please sign and date this form, and return it via FAX(520) 742-1022. For questions or comments, call (520) 229-4849, (520) 229-4816 or email @.sgay@orovalley.net. Monday,January 09,2006 OV ZONING COMPL-JON LEW Approved Without Comments By: Date: = ' J AN — 9 2006 U • 9�d • PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT 11000 N.LA CANADA DRIVE ORO VALLEY,AZ 85737 PHONE:(520)229-4800 FAX:(520)742-1022 WWW.TOWNOFOROVALLEY.COM Application for Siqn Criteria DATE: OV CASE NO#: (office use only) APPLICANT: JOAN 5 P ADDRESS:G3Ltr Al PGAc iY/l b5 6bVA 0 CITY: Tv C 5 0Jl/ STATE: /4 ZIP: 8'S-7 I TELPHONE: 5zo 5 31- S 24 S FAX: EMAIL: PROJECT NAME: t I/A C ti A ]' 6 Op 0 SUBDIVISION: ADDRESS/LOCATION: 15'r AV6t 1/C -rAN creo ��0� l�- ZONING: PARCEL/TAX CODE#: g, L409 17O/g PROPERTY OWNER: C itw-Q et vpi GLC y L G c ADDRESS: 809$ VIA Dg T 9C l0 t Sol-re /0 o CITY: P H06 k STATE: 2 ZIP: 8 Sz 5 g TELEPHONE: 00 6147 - $ 800 FAX: HP q t4/` $S 30 EMAIL: SIGNATURE: tDATE: l /q/Z005 Signs for businesses located within a Commercial and/or Industrial District, Complex or buildings designed for multiple occupancy shall be coordinated so that a consistent design theme is established and maintained. A Sign Criteria shall be written to reflect the general sign regulations as written in the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised, Chapter 28, Signs. Application for a Sign Criteria shall require the approval of the Development Review Board prior to the issuance of any sign permits. A checklist of requirements for submittal is attached along with the required fees. 1 OWN OF ORO VALLJEY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 11000 N.LA CANADA DRIVE ORO VALLEY,AZ 85737 PHONE: 229-4800 FAX: 742-1022 RECEIPT ****************************************************************************** REFERENCE NUMBER: OV304-003A RECEIPT #05P00632 SITE ADDRESS: TAXCODE: 224-02-170A DATE: 12/13/2005 TIME: 10:10 AM COMP TYPE: DEV REVIEW-SIGN SUBMIT TYPE: SC DESCRIPTION: AMENDMENT TO SIGN CRITERIA APPLICANT: JOHN S PICCOLI OWNER: EVERGREEN-TANGERINE LP Notation: AMENDMENT TO SIGN CRITERIA Receipt By: DRM ****************************************************: ************************************** DRM PAID BY: Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 3148 350 . 00 TOTAL: 350.00 FEES PAID: Description Account Code Current Pmts Sign Permits 001-000-319 350.00 TOTAL: 350.00 Account#: Ending Balance: $ Letter of Consent to Amend Sign Criteria for Placita De Oro To: Tim Dollander CTW-Oro Valley,LLC 8098 Via De Negocio, Ste 100 Scottsdale, AZ 85258 Consent is hereby given to amend the Sign Criteria for the Placita De Oro Shopping Center. This property is located on the southwest corner of 1S` Avenue and Tangerine Road, in Oro Valley, Arizona. Details of amendment(s)are as follows: ■ The overall height of any single letter or logo is increased from 48 inches to 61 inches for the current anchor tenant, New Vision Hardware, Inc. dba Oro Valley Ace Hardware. No other changes are being requested. PROPERTY OWNER: CTW-Oro Valley,LL an Ari na limited liability company By: Its: 11 ' Date: r; New Vision Hardware, Inc., 6341 N. Placita De Eduardo, Tucson, AZ 85718 Proposal to Amend Sign Criteria For Placita De Oro Introduction: Request to amend the Sign Criteria for Placita De Oro Shopping Center so that the sign for anchor tenant, Ace Hardware, will be in better proportion to the height of the facade and offer improved advertising for the business. Background: The existing Sign Criteria specifies a maximum letter height based on the square footage of leased space, and does not take into account the height of the facade. Letters can be from 24 to 48 inches tall. Currently the anchor tenant is allowed a maximum letter height of 48 inches. This works fine when all the letters in the sign are the same height, as is the case for Walgreens and Wells Fargo. However, in the case of Ace Hardware, the "A" is the largest letter in the name. In fact, it is over twice the height of the "H"in hardware. This creates several adverse affects directly related to the storefront signage: • The letters on the sign will not proportionally fit with the height of the facade. They could appear unbalanced, strange or out of place when viewed alongside other signage on the site. • Shrinks much of the signage text to a point where it may not be readable from afar. As per Ace corporate standards; if the "A" in Ace is 48 inches high, the "E"has to be 38 inches, the "H"22-3/4 inches and the "r" is only 16-5/8 inches tall. The letters in the word"Hardware"wind up being significantly shorter than the 36 inch high letters available for use by other tenants. Approached from a different point of view; a tenant leasing a space of 4000 square feet can have signage composed of 36 inch high letters mounted on a 20 foot high facade. Ace hardware will have signage with most of its text being 17 inches tall mounted on a 30 foot high facade. The sign criteria currently states "All signs must be integrated with the Shopping Center's architectural character." The existing sign criteria may in fact cause the opposite affect, the Ace Hardware sign may wind up looking strange and out of place. Requested Amendment: Oro Valley Ace Hardware would like to amend the Sign Criteria to allow for a maximum letter height of 60.813 (61) inches. This makes the "E"in Ace exactly 48 inches tall and the "H" and"r" in hardware approximately 29 and 22 inches tall. This better fits with the overall proportions of the building and other tenant signage. The proposed change affects tenants leasing more than 12,000 square feet—in actuality, only the anchor. It should be noted that the sign construction, materials used, color and nighttime illumination are not being altered. The sign will remain halo illuminated and have a copper patina finish. This will blend with the environment during the day as well as evening viewing times. A scale drawing of the proposed sign showing these details is attached. _ ---- e R'N --- ----- - I" \ '"-" \u I II I 1 I I I 1 CS laell \\DRIVEWAY, I j \ I I I 1 1 I I I -------- ������. r 1 ��1�� I t project directory I l r7-I-rT-I-r, �r7-I-r r I-rT. r�11 I ��n. �-rr7-i-r r�-I-ram ' ' 1 rrTn� '/ \ I I I I I I I I II I 1 1 1 1 I ` Ir I I I I, 1-I I I I, rl I I, �;I I OWNER/DEVELOPER: I I '011 11 1 1 1 I L0 I I I I III I I - �1d� I I I i I I t-4 1 I I I L0 1 1 1 1 1 :I 1 DIVERSIFIED PARTNERS,LLG I ~ I I lot 8 CIS!NAG/ I I I I 8048 E.VIA DE NEGOGIO SUITE 100 I I SCOTTSDALE,ARIZONA 85258 I I �... ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1N ®I ( - I ItI I CONTACT: ELIZABETH GASTON r•— r1 I I I I n L� 1 N1� n ; I 1 1 I I I _ ® I I F__ Li L_LL11J1_i_M-J Y 1 I� a\ I �.y-1- -i1 ICI-- Li -- I I PHONE: 0)4 -885000 I--- I 1 a...:......: �, '�"1' . :i.: -r •;, ■ •� I I I FAX:(480)q4?-8830 I a lI I Mt1a.•r!,� � -- I I E-MAIL: a aatonedlversMled artner■.corn L-- 1 LJ I� �I , 1 111 . - -I I ( 1 9 8 r - I �� 1-- e I 1 surz• I II II . \ I ® I, I I I I ARCHITECT: I--- j �� i__ � v.u�I.. :aoos.v '+' ` ! 11 II ..I-® - ;, ! I I I ROBERT KUBICEK ARCHITECTS 4 ASSOCIATES — I L- I I e II II ,�:I__ I I 2255 EAST THOMAS ROAD _� EXISnwO r-- I i" ��r f -- I`; I I 1 PHOENIX,ARIZONA 85016 50'-0" r_- 1 WELLSFARGG I Y-- F I' f�1�7 I k.:q y EXISTING 6.,_�` j I: I CONTACT: KEVIN D.KERPAN '� ` .11IN�-- 1 ir• not 8 '1_ Are�rI r mil ftl. °I _- 1 wwLGEEEws r-j_m_ I I I I PHONE:(602)955-5900 d s wuL JLi 7 �.ai. port \�� It 17 I:;y;II H '{ not a part ` -- :•' I FAX: (602)955-0446 ' exmTlw .�1�, N s II E-MAIL: kkerpanerkaczem I.. i,000 xr. 3 3 F. to.'. •'�I s ( �1 cr--- r .�. _ I / ,, T-- 81 I I R data Clot �' PROPOSED USE. RESTAURANT/RETAIL r rvJ I� �r----�-- �Tyl II 1 ,.w• ,�.1 of I II .�� 11 . 0 _- rNra Mir=.k, ,;, -1 ---' _-1 r' $I I I NET SITE AREA: .8'f ACRES(38,041 5.F,) °"r ~——— — ; * 1 I I I 1 �H -.® ! '; g I BUILDING AREA F ;S .::.• •.:t;. I iI I J L 1 �i11 1 of7-� I-� C I '^ I i PAD A: 4 I I in ......... ,000 S.F. 11 - -_ I/ n , ° PP 5a eK- - 1 I SITECOVERAGE:AREA: 4p00 S.F II . .a■ �� EEEEEE� E '• illiiiiiiiiiiii Z a su .s�.�,�•e��� t3 a R 2 (R�) { I I � TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED: 1�( + 28 SPACES a■r o ; _ ,:.,EEteSSSa■5__ _ I :,_ I e:ne uaoo uA�rwu«r¢vroo.�o awa ! ]w 1 ' v I Am s o00o WV.:en+r.vwao.brr� a � ��rr■•E■■� „; ODSnNO A TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED: 29 SPACES -.20' 3e' 34' •' 34' 0 : : rnrw ii i H DRIVEWAY!j €\ x ns+mo) 5HOP5 D I� w.wsue I_;� 1 1 TiACCESSIBLE SPACES REQUIRED: 2 SPACES -- _ I -t,000 sr. 2;'` L J__ Iw r x �� �, F .l; i I` I I AGGC-SSIBLE SPACES PROVIDED: 2 SPACES � e- til ISara 7.41i`I. IOt c -,...,„, ,,,\,1.::: r.�_ __1 I I o 1111114 t I:,.. , M "II II < 1 .0 ' ''''-- iiiii4if 37.; a w —b�•:. JI!: '1,145 S.F. -II;-i4' _1 ,I, I I ._ I e CENTER �:i a $:S 1 uii 5000 5.F. 4�..�= • - - ��ii- �i i I £ I I F I W I uii '',4:--, s _ - /�i/■�!!!!!!!!!!�!!!Z __ - i I I ' a. 0 1 JV' i • m I♦ I 0g. a Cl/ r- h °ate e ,b t• I W a c, = I '"" ,� MAJOR A %��� � lot'� rd h * 1 a;--''''', 6000 S.F. G b,Nrvl Jr--.. - :Zip I R'I I,1 1- y ! �•: �o• 40o sP. bi:{:�;�: w I^,:; oc 8 0 `a rM. \> b\.• 4:b;� • EGATIN■MEA■■1111(illlll� Wes,+ LJO r 1 I K =i / •4ebb•4. ,b. Vb! YY 7neLLl6 ■.��. \ i I ♦♦t: h SH50 9F. _._.. woxnre S�1 ••1°!ist::[I:'I Z 1 ...'•. %...::/?.':111/41„,!unseen:NI:,,,..,_, ; ......, .,,,,,,,,,,,,„: FIRE I \ 1 ,, N¢7 b rNLL\ Y 1 TRUCK IUDIUf�� I I _ 1 L H.K ry SPEED KW (]S•INNER/Br OU•IRI y� I I b b 11 Lo I''f I NORTH n gq 11 ------------------4'------------------- I 1 175.00" I misim N BB'S7'S5 i%N) 6DA00'(R) e PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN E m w o °. 0 ,O' DO' 110' Ibo' - ......vrimmilepoli COLOR.SFROT SM. .T MAW .errrLo.Y TROCHE Vial, _. wit err `\__ z'_Z�,,-/'__. i.J.�J i'--,_ ( V i 1 \ � g - E ip W 7• mMEWawI. �#;; ■ :iMN M ma ; . I o .11 .NM=STUCCO. CUMIN.STOKE MOM STUCCO. = COLOR S.W. wM./R,COLOR. COLOR SNIOUS .ROMN ST MST. CRRRrK L[OHSTOR[ MOM ST MASAO FRONT ELEVATION(MAJOR A) di 11.1.11111110 ".""IIIIPPORMIPIIIMIIII".....1111111411r1Will. COLOR MA.YT SMLLL .NRTSO.TucCo,COLOR A O . .... I .MSI.L.SN.RR... _ F _ , , 111111110.11 4 � .Zs�r L $rsr-f 1 ' r = tI,, I w�� sesis� �o 11 wRT[O.TUCEO, W V`JNV eoLw.Nwue -- ----, BACK ELEVATION(MAJOR A) § ▪ a W W aE, z J re g W 4 z o1 W• .l rot. _,.. , TFE I _ .,,.. t I i• C J � � r , S 1S j r y j Pi96—L_ I r— ■ r _, 4• { L e i :tit a f ' . 1—.5.:0 i O TONAN T S'ENANT 4�O7ANT TENANT T�4..4'? CANT '.`� •\ , TENANT TENANT TENANT `TENANT TENANT — Li U L Si Li II JI I I I I I I Y I_ . ,._ t U II U Ui Li U 1Li 11 o i■ ��� i. .I -ii i. . ii it iti.i. [; i�•i ■ �N N r' ', ■ N-'::_E-1■i iik. rr"r' 1 —7} , I_ i " 4.......,-■:2.6- ram■i■N �E /�■ Ir- i ',man,on. ow i COMPILED ELEVATION .1 M s • Ili g o _ Chi N I 1 u+ i'r.tiU{' j :1+t t Irwaii \ V. ......._......-. . ''; .�f 'r liui N Zi 1 r i _ e.'F fj • 'MOM II I • !t .1111 4 ( i Ai Ma ,, oil 111 s it i. a fr 1',4',_Iii 7 tt .rt,. 1111 uy • 111111111 , io....L INIIIII 17M . ,, , ri,..., „ ,„ NM iimil ,'1 P k-iiiiiii Y'. . I Z v c� S < �aC m �iii --I .. ill PROJECT OFSCRP,TION Ace Hardware Halo Lit Channel Letters ncvco Oro Valley,AZ L SGLE 3/32"=1'-0" auesr�tsa+ xstcwta t Anthony Noto fie " I H r r - s - 10/19/05 APPROVED av ME NAME t ACE_48_LETTEIRS u .+�fa,.. tt PX-0341-05 1 2 ARIZONA CALIFORNIA NEVAOA This original unpublished drawing is submitted for use in connection with a project being designed for you by Fluoresce. It is not to be shown to anyone outside of your organization reproduced or used in any fashion without expressed written approval . •,-.-, al . N 9 - 2Z-1 V4"(26 .25") T. ".•.:*.; A .,-i: --- 1, b 3.-9 5/5" ' r - , ..., r• (45.625")' 1 1'r P..'; • ,,, • i., , ''' ••1 :-; '....t.....,.......,..,.......................F............. ../ 1 ::• ;rAte ," ',.: • , / .\\s . ..-... \ . . • '-)munimmOr . \\I . .. UJI II I I IP II I 1 . MI lit IIP: - -t'i7vuir#:_eteio iii, immikti IIIIIM -,':c:. 'imrk:.-fir-,-- tx-w, 38"FORMAT . 1 - ,,,.. . ' ''.''i '`,•' - ' -.,:,,,'_.:"..'::,,.--.',....-,-..,-.., ..-,,,:',,i't,:5':•'.,--5'.._:!::::..) ,'It...:''''''''-'''':''''...-:::!: ''''-:. T1 .• ': .!t 6-0 5116. &law' .At.- ilr" Idurfast :di* --- 1-- 1 ill I : \ / " \ 0::. •-: • (/)-I, im mei is I I1 !•Ii---: LLI-.: :::. LI ill II I I ar....,111): is! li Oitli:Iii lirillirilliSfej N =t um il ill ..,-...-.,-, f, • ...MIMI A 111 t.4.,::,:,,, :,,.._,‘,, ,, , ,: -.-riii 1 1 1 0 p -. 11111 Vi, ii : '',fib '7•--' * . : ' _ 48"FORMAT DM'VIEW \111111111111 :':-.;, ! O 29'-5 3/4"(353.75") I " 11'-11"(143") 17-6 3/8"(210.375") m j 9 5/8" L - LL 1. Sa .) O .. o 0 5'-013/16" 3.'' `" (60.813") 4'-0" . ' I— m o a o "A" (48") ..e, 28 7/8" L 221/8" o o" a w c S IT ��p o 6 r: E o n i 3/4" " SCALE:3/8"=1' r 3." Wall type will vary \ a a IT 3"deep aluminum returns ` yrA FABRICATE ONE(1)ILLUMINATED REVERSE CHANNEL LETTER 5ET o ,--a. o °� s. �i4"x 1"spacers > ~ " ACE ILLUMINATED REVERSE CHANNEL LETTER LOGO s �i Clear Poycarbonate backs F, „ -RETURNS- � 'W Aluminum face >r �l,F . ¢ i �, ALUMINUM CONSTRUCTION 3 RETURNS,063 ALUMINUM WITH.080 FADES. w � GTO wire Anchor to wall as wall realuires. "PRIMED AND PAINTED TO MATCH COPPER PATINA FINISH. v 15 mm neon with (Min.three(3)per letter) ILLUMINATION- double backs as shown "15MM 6500 WHITE NEON LIGHT SOURCE-HALO ILLUMINATION. i 1-6 "`' e ,Silicone 3 Rigid conduit connectors ' -INSTALLATION- i i '9 �%' Sealant �must be grounded to "CLIP MOUNTED 3/4"OFF SURFACE OF FASCIA USING REMOTE TRANSFORMERS- SIQE VIEW aluminum letter&there must be a jumpwire between conduit �`' " ACCESS REQUIRED. t I , ate,-b „ dg connectors as shown. ml i,. — 461 Conduit connectors I _` 1 j ,ii w. hitHARDWARE-ILLUMINATED REVERSE CHANNEL LETTERS o o t 354��"Tube Conduit / -RETURNS- ^m 4 `' "ALUMINUM CONSTRUCTION 3"RETURNS,063 ALUMINUM WITH.080 FACES. - ? °o = Transformer "PRIMED AND PAINTED M.A.P.(MATTHEWS ACRYLIC POLYURETHANE)SATIN BLACK. _ Remote mounted -ILLUMINATION- Transformer Box _ O n r Disconnect switch "15MM 6500 WHITE NEON LIGHT SOURCE-HALO ILLUMINATION. -INSTALLATION- U Z "CLIP MOUNTED 3/4"OFF SURFACE OF FASCIA USING REMOTE TRANSFORMERS- C/) ACCESS REQUIRED. W Z J . i/ Oz C U ATYPICAL CROSS SECTION z" ea SCALE 1 h"=1'-U' N a q To: Jonathan Lew From: John S. Piccoli Date: March 16, 2006 Re: Revised sign criteria for Placita De Oro Attached is a revised sign criteria for Placita De Oro. The following changes have been made • Allow Ace Hardware to use lettering up to 61 inches in height • Disallow amber LED lighting • Disallow wall mounted cabinet signs • Add text specifying the maximum square footage of a wall mounted sign relative to offset from a main street. Note: During the second half of 2006, the property sold by Evergreen Devco, Inc.to CTW-Oro Valley, LLC. Therefore, all references to Evergreen Devco in this document have been changed to reflect the new owners. Y f SIGN CRITERIA FOR Placita De Oro BY CTW-Oro Valley, L.L.C. 8098 N. Via De Negocio, Suite 100 Scottsdale, Arizona 85258 March 16, 2006 APPROV D BY: TC/P --Milo G v y Q 3a �ROJECT MANAGE R Sign Criteria This Sign Criteria is established for the purpose of assuring that Placita De Oro (the "Shopping Center") will be an outstanding commercial development with distinctive and compatible signs for the benefit of all owners and occupants. All signs must be integrated with the Shopping Center's architectural character and designed in a manner that will not create a nuisance or diminish the visibility and/or value of other Parcels. Endeavors have been made to work within the requirements of the Town of Oro Valley sign ordinances while creating unique designs that are architecturally compatible with the Shopping Center and make a strong identity statement. All signs within the Shopping Center must conform to the Oro Valley sign code and the standards outlined in this Sign Criteria. Conformance will be strictly enforced and nonconforming installation or unapproved signage must be brought into conformance at the expense of the violating party. General Requirements All signs that are intended to be placed in or on the Shopping Center will be reviewed by the master developer, CTW-Oro Valley, LLC or its Assignee ("CTW") for compatibility with these guidelines. Each building Owner/Occupant will receive a copy of these guidelines before designing signs. Plans must be approved in writing by CTW prior to installation. CTW's approval of such plans does not constitute a representation or warranty that such plans are in compliance with applicable governmental requirements. Compliance with all governmental requirements is the sole responsibility of each Owner/Occupant. Standards and Requirements ■ Each Owner/Occupant must submit 2 sets of detailed drawings of all signs at least 15 days prior to submitting for permits ■ After the proposal is reviewed, CTW will return one set of drawings marked either "Approved," "Approved as Noted," or "Revise and Resubmit." • Approved — Owner/Occupant is permitted to proceed with sign construction/installation. • Approved as Noted — Owner/Occupant must make any revisions noted on plans before proceeding with sign construction/installation. y Revise and Resubmit — Drawings will be returned with comments and should be revised accordingly. Owner/Occupant must then resubmit for another review. ■ Sign content shall be restricted to the identification of business or service located on a Parcel. ■ All signs shall be made of durable and long-lasting materials. ■ No exposed neon tubing, ballasts, crossovers, raceways, conduits, conductors or transformers are permitted, except conduit at any under-canopy signs (which must be painted to match the canopy). APPROVED BY: TC/PZ/ OA 1.1-1;`` io 0v30yb34 te DAT PZ KR6jEYTVANAGER • All screws, nails and fasteners shall be made of non corrosive material. • Any damage to a building's fascia, canopy, structure, roof or flashing which is caused by the sign contractor or Owner/Occupant must be repaired and/or paid for by the sign contractor or Owner/Occupant. All penetrations of the building structure required for sign installation shall be neatly sealed in a watertight condition. No penetrations of the roof of any building are permitted. • No labels shall be permitted on the exposed surface of signs, except those required by local ordinance. Those required shall be applied in an inconspicuous location. • All neon shall have P-K housing. • All electrical signs shall bear the UL label and shall conform to local building code, electrical code and zoning standards. Prohibited Signs No sign shall be painted on the surface of any building or structure. No sign shall be placed or located on the roof or extend above the roof of any building. No sign shall be located or constructed in a manner that materially impairs the visibility of or access to any other parcel or buildings located thereon without the prior written consent of the Owner(s) of the adversely affected parcel(s). No animated, flashing, blinking, audible, placard, poster, playbill, posting, painting, change-panel, flag, fixed balloon, rotating light, "A-frame," moving or rotating signs are permitted. Signs cannot be installed within the public right-of-way. No sign shall be placed on or attached to any vehicle except for signs painted directly on the surface of the vehicle and meeting all applicable governmental requirements. The primary use of such vehicles shall be in connection with the operation of a business on a Parcel and not advertising or identifying the business premises. No sign shall be permitted which is structurally unsafe or constitutes a hazard to safety or health. Prohibited signs are further regulated by the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised, Chapter 28, Signs. Freestanding Signs The design of all monument signs and panels to be placed thereon is subject to review and approval of CTW. All freestanding signs shall be "monument" style and must be compatible with the architecture of the Shopping Center. • The name of the anchor tenant "Waigreens" will appear at the top of each of the two monument signs existing as of the date of this Sign Criteria. The balance of the sign area is reserved for future building occupants. • The signs will be preeminently located at the main entrances along 1st Avenue and Tangerine Road and will be placed in such a manner that will not present any traffic hazard. • The maximum area of each sign is 50 square feet. • The maximum height of each sign is 6 feet above adjacent grade. • There will be a maximum of three businesses identified on each sign. APPROVED BY: TC/PZ iB OA EPZfr/rLeuge__iD OJECT MANAGER • The larger "Walgreens" and other building occupant copy will be reverse pan channel, patina colored letters with backlit illumination provided by fluorescent tubing within the sign cabinet. The "Drive-Thru Pharmacy" copy, mortar and pestle and the stars will be routed out from the aluminum sign face, backed up with acrylic color. All of the copy will be illuminated from within the cabinet with T-12 fluorescents. • All monument signs will be designed to match the materials, color and style of the two existing monument signs as shown per attached. Building Mounted Wall Signs The design of all wall signs is subject to the review and approval of CTW. Any variations from these standards are at CTW's discretion. • All storefront signs must be fabricated from individual reverse pan channel letters. • Individual reverse pan channel letters must be constructed with aluminum. • Wall signs must be centered vertically and horizontally on the fascia. Building Frontage/Location; Building Frontage and/or Location are defined as set forth in the Oro Valley Sign Code. Fasteners: All signs, bolts, fastenings, sleeves, and clips must be of hot-dipped galvanized iron, stainless steel, aluminum, brass, or bronze. Connection Devices: Exposed connection devices are not permitted. Electrical Parts: Exposed electrical devices are not permitted. Sign Area: Aggregate sign area permitted for each business shall be calculated per Oro Valley Sign Code. Colors: The following color palette has been established for this development. Each Owner/Occupant shall utilize only those colors approved within the criterion unless otherwise allowed. 1. Copper Patina and/or Mission Patina 2. Black anodic 41-335 (match Mathews) 3-M 3630-22B 3. White acrylic 015 3-M 3630-20 4. Dark Bronze 41-313 (match Mathews) Letter Style: Letter style is to be per the Owner/Occupant's corporate standards, subject to CTW's approval Illumination: Illumination is to be halo backlit, using white neon, or white LED. APPROVED BY: TC/PZ RAoA '-t"-b--O, a vac y c3,6 ZieGym P PROJECT MANAGER Logos shall consist of reverse channel. Logos with corporate colors, or protected by federal law, may be used with proof of registration at time of application. Unprotected logos shall be restricted to colors provided herein. Maximum size of logos shall be limited to eight (8) square feet. Illumination shall be halo white neon, or white LED. Other Wall Signs Size: • Maximum sign area shall not exceed the area permitted in the Oro Valley Sign Code. • The overall height of any single letter or logo shall be restricted as follows: y Leased area up to 2,000 s.f.: 24" maximum letter height • Leased area 2,001-6,000 s.f.: 36" maximum letter height • Leased area 6,001-12,000 s.f.: 48" maximum letter height ✓ Leased area 12,001+: 61" maximum letter height • Double lines of copy are permitted but shall not exceed a total combined height of 48" • Only the Ace Hardware use and pad may utilize a 61" maximum letter height. • Tenants with wall frontages within 300 feet from a main street may have 1 square feet of signage per linear foot of building frontage, not to exceed a maximum of sign area of 150 square feet. Tenants with wall frontages more than 300 feet from a main street may have 1 '/2 square feet of signage per linear foot of building frontage, not to exceed a maximum of 200 square feet." Window Signs or Graphics Glass areas of storefronts and offices may contain graphics indicating business name, address or suite number, hours of operation, emergency phone numbers, logos, etc.; subject to compliance with the Oro Valley Sign Code. Under Canopy Signs Occupants of in-line shops space must identify their main entrance with an under canopy sign. Location: • Over entrance, oriented perpendicular to store front Size: • The maximum area of each under canopy sign is set forth in the Oro Valley Sign Code. Guidelines: APPROVED BY: TC/PZ/i . -OA • One under canopy sign allowed per entrance. --�-p b o v3Qz/o3�1 DTE P PROJECT MANAGER- • Building occupants may display their own graphics with their corporate identity on a standard double-sided panel provided by Diversified. • Under canopy signs may be illuminated subject to approval by CTW. Other Additional Sign Types Allowed All other sign types, including permanent and/or temporary signs shall follow the rules and regulations set forth in the Town of Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised, Chapter 28, Signs. All permanent sign types shall be reviewed by the management company prior to applying for permits with the municipality and shall be restricted to using only those colors available within the approved color palette unless protected by federal law. APPRQVED BY: TCIPZ/IRB/BOA D TE P PROJECT MANAGER .. KEY NOTES I g 6 L_1 . . , \ . \ i V. ._. S. . . ---_-_-::-:..---' (It'-1 - --'-' --- - 0 BY OTHERS. IN(TpERlicS,ICcTITON#9917:00VE.M)ENT . &Si - ,JA‘ \ :-_______---- i IIML PROPOSED SIDEWALK AND PEDESTRIAN . ,............. ...._ .4 0 ....;........-:-....-,---------' ' ®CONTROL BOX TO BE RELOCATED WITH i -1---- PHASE 1 CONSTRUCTION I SEE 0V1204- 14A 8c 14 ____ :_,;----------:----- ------ ------------- --- l' 411114 i\ -'--':- 0 MaSFE2AD.11102,;(LIITERATI°"/ § ----:-____Ej.;,T, .----- .,--- _i_...„. ',. ..,. 40. __„ __ _.. „ ....,,,,-_....-.,_ -.."- , .1 .A, 1 A:__, -.._-. W PROPOSED 6'WIDE SIDEWALK. & 1 •-..* \ , NN ...____ (,. ....,....,.....4) )\ -7-,--- ---7-----_--,----------7_. ..7,±,-,-.2:--------'''---'------- 2 - -_---_-_:----. „. __ . •. 2„ At' - . PM ..ni. r • elr ...:2,...,:::_-___.... --•--rrr"--\\` frA DEPRESSED CURB OPENING, .1.01W- ' ---------"It, "..., \ ° ' A., - ___ .,..7.---,- _________ r . . NI- a .....,..(140.„%I . XIS,SEWE1-4(G-134-133),Twi I -,...... 41/, '' I --------\-\":1- \l_../SEE DTL.7-SHEET C-5. rv..... ®6.VERTICAL CURB&GUTTER. /7\6.EXTRUDED CURB AT CONSTRUCTION V_/PHASE UNE. •k i 6 i 0 -' — . I". '''''''''..,..P.1".... --"•IMNTO'S 1111' i ---11,4 4.. , ®al?,gicRX p.:g.SEE SHEET 8 OF 1 6 i.. ---,....,---_.... ___..,... .. 001,. 0. ' ! 4 V •..---\\2-1___Te-v_.-___—_. ..,...- - -.-....-— - ---..fik"-- -----.. .-.----- _.`,_ . .. .r..""ris- _._J --745 44(Eiak>0....'`-1, .... e _ ..,.,, ______ ....,,_ .. .v...7(„,,\..\ ...,_ j \ ®NOT USED 0001111,000,_„0"__Alwko ) i\ "'-... ----__ 1 ''111'"M-'.7.::. -;-----:- -_-- --firs& • ; ___L - _ - -------;\ 0 r WATER UNE. t I re7' 356.'il\ 1, i ' 11111.1111111'18.11111111.1111111111*1111.1._.. -------- 1 1 0. . CO LP Z(D' ;.', e i d ("-- I (-11.-, D'-' _.---‘,:::-_-,:---------_-_-,.-.. .' ' FD pReo:ATER.U4N.E,...ATE SANITARY SE . ; -230*TAPER 0 V----7T F. 78.10 W 0 :-..-- ,i 0 il 'II mein I( --,--,,,,-,:::--,-------Wher •--,..*-....1"....,„... , '• - 1 _ ®PROPOSED Ir PUBUC SEMER UNE. 1 _ 144:1111AMIMM, w_MEIIIEICIEZIA....11rilr:::::an ......1.-1.11t.....--i-w „, .", ,,,ii": \ 9' -'4 111 11';44 'I ' ' • I.,i-M.Ijk en" int.ik- 1. _ • .6, r/ : 2 \: 26 „.. °I— P 7 7 '' .." / 1/ ( 087 .- .P. 4' 0 . 0 7 448. r-1242...7.L. • '7..,,, 1_ 0 e 0 •,m 41) •Lc) -, y- ----_____. 08 NEW AVM ISWEIC MAAWOLE ZR& I'DYI,TTETFi VDM.PLDETTEL..SD-500. /;;\ex 12-CONCRETE HEADER PER PC/COT STD.DIL.0213. ts a L.,gl 4C ‹).\ / \.,, \ \ \ '- . , I MGM_ P.II yani22,11 1 401_II _ II r ., ..........,........ , 0 " ,°'K!) iiii .r.„,1 i . 6.,,1,414_ , ,".POST 0,..4.0 0-r-S. -.-A 740'NSVT W/15'STEM N.::./(NEAR SIDE VISIBIUTY TRIANGLE)(50 mph). (.;\580.FSVT W/15'STEM & Z 2 >= Od.i..` N.:-_,(FAR SIDE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE)(50 mph). ; ecLU uiZE / I 14 1 r—Th„Oc 01'1.- I 20'• I -lcatiliff , i. : LDING'A: arm 1 ,.- • '. 1 ,.----_, 1 LASS" .."..... 1.,... ...QS",I jt,. ,..... \._ I ' 11111 '161.1 IF:111. ' 91" ' PROPOSED 16.1(8-TAPPING SLEEVE. . -.I. I • I "•"11 "-' :.,..\,..\_\.',„,.. ./ ROOD S.F. I TII1 .0 I ,.EILDC. , 04'',----',- 14'2. g 1 ‘. i welfair-a-.1&& , II .-4 -1"/ikif I - .- - \\ /;1A, PROPOSED TRASH ENCLOSURE W/SCREEN1NG 1 ICE•-•<'2.--;CD MI FF-75.2 ,u, r , -1/4„, , . •,..• \ , KIM S.F. zr, i -.,p,„ .....:• V:::/PER OV2CR 9-110.C. 4 '' I .. ,. .1 e PROPOSED 12-RCP WITH HEADWALL AND TRASH RACK. L. - I -up •-,,,, 1 114---] - . I li mmemotalIt ,.,,,3 g LiN 119 1 -11 tio sumninnez ,3117 ()PROPOSED 12.103-TAPPING SLEEVE. f § 25 ,0 — ---cL;kss it Cr p .. uni. .,. eiP 2.,.' .kgr-.1.7-.. ---_ii-qui slog I j'4,,111Nliii -'-vd,'3. 0 PROPOSED 3'WIDE VALLEY GUTTER. 5‘'• iii 0 PROPOSED WEDGE-SHAPED TRACT PER SECTION I - .al*ra014.,-.... t 0 N ..-, t.."57.45 0 11'Dill :': i. .-11111'. -.- 0 1 w- 01) _ ),..r. _ ,..,,...:A. , , s .1 10-004.A-2 \ __ i•--Ni„,.az. ...___Ji;ivi IL. .r. .00",'011.-? 1 \ ...a.t.....,._, .-... -7.57,5 ._ 4.4 II ,„ 1,11.11 11Evg its.fa. It E ii:.-:-',..----417.4t . ....../...,4, ,!, . 1. e.# c....i. . ,• .,.114.9 •.•.. ..i ii / , --- PROPOSED RETAINING/SCREEN WALL.RETAINING HEIGHT VARIES BASED ON PARKING LOT GRADE RELATIVE TO ®EXISTING GRADE.SCREEN WALL NOT TO EXCEED 3-1/2't IN HEIGHT. SEE GENERAL NOTE 044 ON THE COVER t) . ..)15 'PORK CHOP'ISLAND. 1 , ... • '•.761'. 0 m 4_. F 1114D=9 ISiVii::::::•.4,:::::::_m,,___:: ,,, w**41111111 am 14%,07,„ ,0, ,„, .c.,.... 1 ,NIL,1 i , Posr o,......- .0 PROPOSED GRADER DITCH. o 2 roN, '... ;pi = • ' , w N G 69 90 1 t I II Al.•9 k , gri' --5869W, Cilir7o7.O°. P-1 •P L,1-l' ''' I li ®SITE FURNITURE(SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS,SHEET 8). ; pt4ril Wig SANGER,.HILLS ka. Itm I 4 : 111W ,, Ts P ..• ....,, : 0,0 1 ,k,..40.1 Ilerze 1 1 i F.om, p, h, 0 \ INSTALL ACFC 1/2-FOR'ME ENTIRE ROADWAY WIDTH BOOK 31 1.16P,PAGE 51 ' 'mom Ili, iiii _ . i , ' "- r, 1 Ay z oi i • , Ai 1 1 la s A-6- a---:,,k . 1... 1111111-a-' 0 FROM STARTING OF STRIPING TO ENDING OF STRIPING . 1511C71 1 I ALONG FIRST AVENUE. - &?_MI '• BA.S1N#2 24 fmE;:.; CO' ---?, - i\ 0 ye, 1._AL-4.-;,0,7, ,. ..,,,„6 3 l' I .• • -1 1 110,Ify NMI 107 ILL.1-',1;:65V0 PROPOSED 6'HIGH SCREEN WALL CONTRACTOR TO i 1f.71 ‘\ ‘. P 67 , / 'V 6, .'Fj" la AT'S'''' 50 CONSTRUCT WROUGHT-IRON FENCING BLOCK-OUTS 1 I IMP ...17 k- I \ --. 0Fri '' 7i Se'1 • 1•.1,.• a-I' ' I _ ! k ISSimo,., UP-002 C.F. CE A c - I4i7.:4 ; LA.ss II MEIIII 4, 411 I' 'i _ 0 ALONG THE WALL EVERY 40 ALONG THE LENGTH OF 5 THE WALL. SEE DETAIL 11,SHEET C-5. SEE GENERAL; ' II-0-7,,,, -,213.900 S.F. \UP WOO ...,--P., Ash, ' NOTE 444 ON THE COVER SHEET. P 70 7 EMI,P Il 24 REDO.K. P A3A2 ___„ 'W -:,,d- ip•, _ . 0 lair 0 t \,,,.. ____------ e INSTALL STANDARD STOP SIGN i ,, .11111 - - -.-11-'- -- Oh Le,.._ I 0 P 66.42 4,,..4,4 ..- -iv:-L6'725... "died j' ®IVATE:A.BICYCLE PARKING. TYPE AND NUMBER OF '- 4111, =I ° 0 41/4 , 4 ?P 6t41 'l Plirklitri pr ,_,.: u,,x , —1fro - .:,eas-.0 , ›.,Gs),N. -Z,. ... ' 1 , 11J 4 0 INSTALL PRECAST CONCRETE SAFETY CURB. 1 1- 50'BONDING/KJ\NOSCAPE TS' 6M1M.I I 1 pe 1%. -, '_• 00.2‘,4t.• . ,,,,,,,,, i ,_ .0..,,+,. \ 0.-:-.. o• `.4-/ -G 0.4 i I'1,1.1r,.. j .6k410'1 $1, .66 50 F• ' ' W .0 i ' ' \ • ----•- " ' -• '''' - Z 77,1 - "..'4 0 '•k - - '-- . -, -1 41 It -11900—N. 0 )19,V.1DNAGpuAILA'Z'A"focEprogrsTa%ggVAID TO ; it-.:r.:,,,,N., ACCESS./ ti' • . 4-'1 r. 0 grlrfj C)441.—. '' .) Plhi0 0 l'!°517)1DOPHEANDOTTO SEPXACTED PAR 18111N :RENT. i ''Z'' ',I MUM 1 I /-. ''.4 -- law-jrlirty--4 . & c. 7 ®PROPOSED 12-RCP WITH 4-ORIFICE PLATE.HEADWALL 1 , .,....„7. ,1 i. ,. i , „r:ommoliWiiii , most kli.41.3\ AND TRASH RACK. A.iii4 ,L_ ®EXISTING PALO VERDE TREE TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED. I DESIGNED: WtC ..diii mairlfrcrial ,iii a-_,Cift-lir(T-1 RET.WALL"". . le. P 66.3° 1 1 1 1 _......- 0 1;14rOcSE,D HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE RAMP PER DTL 8, I DRA., wic/.0 t CHECKED: WEC AlSa 1 1 .0.2'VEHICULAR OVERHANG PER DETAIL 12,SHEET C-5. • .iiilitireTAIMI • , DATE. WOO I 22 FG 66 A 6 ... ''. . 0, ,, \CI.1.•RyA'ON A:N.::. I LL2.....±11 ( i c,C0 . ---.. ...—. 1 JOB NO.. 81561133 '' ...,..,. ....2.4 1 Ilis,,,, ,------- UAWITI 53 1 ".... 1111 , - '• 3 I -- l'\ 11111 1 . , , ' \DURING PHASE a MAL DEsiON I I\ i 1 I .! I ' , \ . 1 . . 30. r RE IOW 1, \ 1 0 , \ 4?..... OV1 09 ngi.iii"...11.1, y 2 OF 5 . .... et • 1/4 ww.WC W OV08-00-09 D. P. BK 22 PG 64 S11-I 2 OF 5 , . The Ace Hardware logo mark shows Ace in one of a kind" lettering, especially designed for Ace Hardware dealers. ..1,-1.,. Form(If The Logo Mark :4 In the word Ace,the positions of the letters to each other are constant, and the tieater t relationship never changes.The prong width of the letter E, labeled 1X(below), . provides the measurement used to proportion the logo. Logo Marl( ''''''' 'r''',',::'''''2,,,,,,,Wa-,":..'....,-;•15.f' ,W..1'.4:-',,,''7,::: 1X *Ii,,,?:>• 1/3k A , 0 _ 711 lk -mi Relation of Logo Mark Elements Changing the design of the logo mark in any way jeopardizes the integrity and P'4:3-';-'".,-,' •.iki 1..„. ., r.,:„ recognition inherent in a proprietary trademark as explained in the previous section of this document. The following examples of design changes represent incorrect forms of the 10 Cl/ ® ippr Ace logo mark: °Never use Ace in a different ilk A perspective,where the relationship of the A,C,and E has been changed either in IN ES 1* i 8 OPY height or spacing between letters, @where color or design devices break up the Ace,within a geometric shape or 0 0 III1S ()in body copy,()Ace placed upside down,On a non-horizontal format, °slanted,Oetc. Note:Special lenses are used by some publishers ) to shrink only the width of advertisements.Using a 'shrink"or''squeeze"lens distorts.Check with publishers to ensure that the Ace signature will not Ok be mechanically altered. A E,, --............-, OD Page Dealer Identity Standards Manual " " Elements .....%.' ., ...:::5: ::':.....:',......... ..d R'.'S'.." tl :'/.::::4 '.. "...::::,l ...:/::'.'.f ':':....i: .:il"::t;:'.: :,.A.:t::.:Y' :'I:/. ... .,/.. !? Relation Graphic The logo mark is usually used with specified supporting words (right)to create the Ace Hardware dealer signature. an entity with its own use standards described in the Dealer Signature section, ' mardware The logo may be used without supporting words in advertising and promo- tional materials if it is separated from adjoining copy or illustrations by a tao tor of or more. However,the store's name,address and telephone number - P RA E must be printed nearby as explained in the sections labeled Advertising and Promotional Items.Any exceptions to this guideline must be approved by the Identity Standards Committee. The following represent incorrect uses of the logo mark. , Dear Dealer., A WS '''' The 19- The letter"A"from the Ace logo should � Sp rill!. never be used alone.The only exception to r rr .. 7ey � g this is when the"A" is used in the repeating resul show us that "A" pattern found on Ace Brand packaging or on corporately produced interior signage (see page 20). This pattern is pending Never use the logo mark as a or as part of a publication title or trademark approval. Any use of the"A" substitute for the word Ace in as a part of a business form title. pattern must be approved by the Identity copy or illustrations, Standards Committee. Mark The dealer logo mark with the sup- porting words in one of these four lx x, t accepted formats is always preferred r i a, f lx for dealer identification, Use it on let- ,; ....-_...., SM terheads, envelopes, labels, certain .. . _ .. .Ith 7S11 A all n atieu nameplates,shipping cartons and ak literature that formally represent the 12x ,.. ----.-.- 2x L name of your business. Use of the logo mark alone must conform to the standards stated above. Any exceptions to these standards must be approved by the Identity . Snotith's i Standards Committee. a a I2X 2X [-- „ 1 i iii : a i + Smith's Y Y . a i if i^ie'4 i_ _ i �` i' a' r fi ix ." 2x _ a a ' a ab i 1 2x A lw - . , 0 's Ace Hardware Page Ace Hardware for oration 4 f ir . vir A' 71 le . - 4 *.... ... ' Id . 1. '' f" "Sr' • 171 ''„;"*.-""._. > . .. . 46 - • *01* 100. . , ' ,.*a (4 >$21 Z. if.: ' 4( " 1:0, ,4430,r"" ' ' t .*:- '440t '.41 ,.. •:, , r . -, i • . .....,,, ip . z, ,,, 40- - - - , , , • Hi rw * '44 *,- ''' L j' i I, 0, 1- w' , - , • ,,, 11100 of Z jopkta., At 4. c•Ct k'4 14 * ".11111441.4 ' , —,„ • it* i ...„ ts, r 1 V YV •,.... A , Alliii.* t.„........4 r.-AV.'4' 414 'A 4 el r , I • I 4.,I?, (..•t"It 0,1 r - 1r ' 4111111 „ k •.,-4 1 .0)c t • : . ' crj Q F 1 1 II .• L 4 Ti.-r,>- i ii 4... t: 1 ;1 r—' 1---- ___ N>o _ ' 1 — .....• 7„........._.1,...111 .., it. i ....k. , ...NJ ...," .,.. „, I. ,„,... CU to'1 I-1r- -.. rn•-•• o ,i;efIll* ' 6 "F • (i) - . . • i ',I l''.. L.. --._. 1 41010.4 , t' * 1 ' ...-'' • 1 I L: 4. • 1 \'‘ — -I , .„,• ,, . 1...t.... 1...1 . . 1 1 II t ' , t ;1 . , „ .....------ ,' . lia. * Ai .,' • , ' , el,'" '‘, - • , . ., ., . c) c):3 I . • "). - *' , , I. 4 . ' , , ,, ,(,) " ' • A r :. ' CI,`'.1 <-, • , . ir r / . a,.., t - ....„ , ...„... , , i fir*---- ..„... , 1......,:.-..... .„, 13 U I..L.1)1,:tuN ...,C' -, : — (/‘ ..„ ',,..., • . .,,,,,, ...: ,($4 — , • ' 7,960 S.F. . . . .., t , 8 * 22' BLDG. HT. . .,.. 4. A .:I .11r15034/4airtiiii- ';`-', , 4 ., .al Ett 3., 44 f ‘, 6. " ) I Pit. .. .. • • fiTilki 1 1 ,,,. .1,.... :•.• ... • ,• , .• r , , 1,..., • t*,,, t ..._.* tt ,,4 .,s,.- . ' . i - ,, ,, , 4. *4 ,o,.01 ,0-.-__L.,r '--"`",-4.--•",'7,4. 1"' - -- , ' ,' r ''', A 4' , \ 1-4 • ,If 71 4 h"I'''', , '0;41'' .°1,1* ''' ----- h. '1 -..? _.........,_ — . ... -_. ..... ' ' --- ,--.4-• ,... ....-,44440-4440.00040--;.'. . -'' 51104 10111,4PnWIP4"''' '"'"' s'"4".4.•".'' ..-.1 '-.f — ~,. ., , ,, •• '0,,+.'" '''*44),4" '7::4"'", ," 1.*, . ... , , ' E ...,, c ---,,,, (1 zr u, r riff ,..- • "K.._, ..."" . . . • * * • 4 • . . 4 • . !T . 4 4 . * . ,. . . i 'A'.' 4..''''. , i qo , , i '.' lislip Lili 111 !lifill I I I III ffilf i ' / 1 it ill 11 01 / 1111 1 1 111 ,11, lid I I : F li / 1 i! 1 I ( i i 1, I ; . ' 1 k !Aft t t I it '11 ' , t 1, • c i i 1 1 11 f c 1 g a .1 I I • I 1 I t a 1 I ir )opp, 1 WALGEENI S --{ ift4 •\ .. -. "..,•4 or*"W1100 AT 1ST AVE. & TANGERINE ROAD -----,....0.1.1 04.46 MOMS ...-- { . '.'7 1 •,.-.... ii ULTIMATE BUILD OUT ...t,v 5..e.,,...—Oar*a.r Amor**AWN. Consulting Engineers,Inc. ',,,,, , - rbc.o..,AZ AtiVI 010,1 ma-Yaw LANDSCAPE ali INMININ SAW& MIN . , . a - n c ' 0. g x 48" 36" 24" 16" 5O' S6' z c . ..- sue . ffl l9 0 x I. : ' Sf. i = J CCJ 2 t v • w: C 11-8" (140") - TF c SHA.L i NN'•- 10 OsClAT0t.M Et .:1 1 L mo 17' 12'-7" (151") ;ERA IF HEMP FOUIPMEN I BETWEEN SUNSET ANL) u = 36'` SUNRISE AND IN NO CASES,AHLIF_N NNAN 3:l,O kM Q o 36" 24" 10'-0" (120") (1'GIMA CODE SECTION:1at24,) N > c a. Q o L 18" 16" u O o 0 24" ! 20" Pd — it 8 -!P O * ' Lrt0f- alegAtigelle4C4L Li • E c w e' _. o zFuture errant aeDz D 45 `� mt., � 1f -; (72 ) $_ _ _ - z Mk '` O.A.H. z -:: I z - L o Is- .... . ,.... '''' ''' : ‘; ' 7 ' u Future enalt y .., .. - „.. . , _....._ , _ __ _ _ ,_ .• , 1 _ 4_ y ,i d 1 - ,,, g � .e , . „:2x,tr,...,-....:, sc. ., ..... '. Itj :llir --*-11,-._ .._ .... . , I 10.630 EACH 4.36 (C ) o 3.050 10.63 ( ] oz e- zi- 20" ( ) 5'-3 (63 ) •* Cg o ** Oti= 22" 10" � ...a lacita de Oro *** 15" 15uture ea ..„ ig x _ SCALE:3/8"= 1-0" ©2001Fluoroseo Lighting&Signs Coordinator Approval Production Approval Li /4 I 1._______ 1_________I____ I ® 1 1/2"ANGLE CABINET-.080 ALUM.SKIN ® 2"ANGLE CABINET-.080 ALUM.SKIN © CMU BLOCK BASE WITH STONE VENEER FINISH TO MATCH BLDG. t n .125 ALUM. FACES-ROUTED GRAPHICS @ .125 ALUM.FACES- RACEWAY STRUCTURE FOR ELECTRICAL © CMU BLOCK BASE PLANTER WITH STUCCO FINISH a © 2"CLEAR ACRYLIC"PUSH-THRU"-FACE PAINTED PATINA © 200 HOUSINGS FOR"WALGREENS"RPC LETTERS C CONCRETE PAD POURED FOR BLOCK STRUCTURE P 0 CWHO F24T12 FLUORESCENT LAMPS-ACCESS ON SIDE ® .125 ALUM.PANELS REMOVABLE FOR FUTURE TENANT RPC LETTERS 0 1/2"x 1211'J'-BOLT ATTACHMENT 1 ® 'J'-BOLT ATTACHMENT TO BLOCK STRUCTURE BELOW ® 'J'-BOLT ATTACHMENT TO BLOCK STUCTURE BELOW ® 1/2"x 30"'J'-BOLT ATTACHMENT z O O ® #4 REBAR EACH WAY @ 12"O.C. N ® #4 REBAR VERT.EVERY OTHER CELL m c m= THERE SHALL BE NO OPEFATION.MAINTENANCE ORJ R PAIR OF HEAVY EQUIPMENT BETWEEN SUNSET AND ® INCOMING PRIMARY ISOLATED TO DISCONNECT SWITCH - s .� E v .� o = SUNRISE AND IN NO CASES EARLIER THAN 6:00 AM © a 5 g _ p (TOWN CODE*SECTION:10:14.5) u ! n z O � _ 36„ "• ; to o • O 3611 24" 10'-01" (120") 24" Q o 0 2411 18" 16" w C5 20" w o f �- ` . w O r yet. =.I .l �. \ 3" 0 C • I I Q" O ilL N 221 �► (f I _ w i�. , _ w - a . 36„ li .L, . i_ > gow ., 6 0 60" 45" ; :/:: : 7_._._.n1I.I_._...1._1._...,.—_.7- (7211) ___-----,I-4•./, :-, _• ___ ir::tL___i,y'1,. .L2rii,i,,,,_.4 \:,L; I --1 -=.I ; O.A.H. ` ` Ii ; _ ' ` HL ': i' 100)-1 70 :c y. ::L4....,,i1_Z:: r ,' . I ! (_____ ___ i i‘,_ ,ic: y- O ® ® Cei © © 0 kii711:1 / -z-.. SCALE:3/8"= 1-0" z s C;onrdinator Aenmval , T— — _ — _ Production Approval MINUTES OF THE ORO VALLEY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD REGULAR MEETING TUESDAY, MARCH 14, 2006 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11000 NORTH LA CANADA DRIVE CALL TO ORDER: 6:00 p.m. PRESENT: Mary Caswell, Chair Harold Kandetzke,Member David Johnson,Member Dan Sturmon,Vice Chair Marc Panas,Member Mike Zinkin,Member ALSO PRESENT: Melinda Garrahan, Town Attorney Sarah More, Planning &Zoning Administrator Bayer Vella, Principal Planner Paul Keesler, Development Review Division Manager Pamela Holt, Planner Jill Manion-Farrar, Planner Jonathan Lew, Planning Technician Arinda Asper, Recording Secretary ABSENT: John Buette,Member PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE CALL TO AUDIENCE 03/14/2006 Development Review Board Minutes Page 2 of 11 REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF FEBRUARY 2, 2006 SPECIAL SESSION AND STUDY SESSION AND FEBRUARY 16, 2006 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MINUTES MOTION: Member Panas MOVED to recommend approval of both sets of minutes as submitted. Member Zinkin SECONDED the motion. Motion carried 6-0. CONSENT AGENDA REGULAR AGENDA A. OV13-06-07, AF Sterling Homebuilders requests architectural approval of model #2965 for Rivers Edge Lots 70-102, located in the Melcor PAD on the north side of Lambert Lane east of the Highlands Mobile Home Park, Parcel# 224-28-1400. Item moved from Consent to Regular Agenda because of concerns about the proposed architectural design. Applicant Robert Brack, 629 West Naranja Place, explained they were trying to differentiate it from the other two-story models. They have two adjacent lots that none of the other models will fit on and applicant needs to use this model on those two lots. For the rest of the lots, applicant has other alternatives. To address the conditions of approval which state that no two models of the same elevation and variation be placed on adjacent lot, the elevations and color palette would be different. There was discussion about the similarity in colors and elevations and with the tower element. Bayer Vella said the staff report would address the issues being questioned. Jill Manion-Farrar introduced the staff report and clarified how the proposed architectural changes differ from the existing models. Proposed model was created for lots 96 through 101, which are narrower than the other lots, and this model is the only one that fits in lots 97 and 98. The use of different elevations and colors and the conditions on Exhibit A provide ample variety for adjacent models. Member Johnson expressed concern that the high, vertical and flat appearance of the tower on all three elevations is not compatible with the previous submissions. MOTION: Member Zinkin MOVED to recommend DENIAL of OV 13-06-07 based on findings that the proposed model and variations are not consistent with the models and elevations already approved. Member Johnson SECONDED motion. Motion carried 6-0. F:\MINUTES\DRB\2006\03-14-06 Minutes.doc Draft approved 04/11/06 03/14/2006 Development Review Board Minutes Page 3 of 11 1. OV12-05-28, Canada Vistas, requests approval of a Preliminary Plat/Development Plan for the Vistoso Town Center; located at the southeast corner of Rancho Vistoso Blvd. and Moore Road; Parcel #219-21-001 D. Applicant Steve Solomon, 12753 North Walking Deer Place, gave a presentation which included a historical perspective on the site. This project presented a problem in that the site, which is designated as a high intensity use, was found to include a relatively intact Hohokam village. Mitigation is the only state requirement for the 13-acre core site, which is valued at $8 million. The solution was the creation of a collaborative Honey Bee Village Preserve Working Group, comprised of Oro Valley staff, representatives from Pima County, archaeological consultants, Arizona State Museum, Cultural Resources and Historical Preservation, the Tohono O'odham Nation, and the applicant. The resultant product is a comprehensive development plan that includes development of four components: preservation of the core site, a single family home subdivision, condominiums, and a commercial center. Applicant is donating the core 13-acre to Pima County. Pima County is to transfer ownership to Oro Valley, and Pima County bond money will be used to pay for archaeological studies. Desert Archaeology Present Bill Doelle, 4550 Caminito Callado, gave a historical overview of the Hohokam occupancy of Honey Bee Village, an explanation of Desert Archaeology's involvement with the site beginning in the mid- to late 1980's, and an description of the future archaeological work that will be conducted on the site. Steve Solomon explained the permitted uses for the Rancho Vistoso PAD and discussed the project's development components. The residential component consists of 145 lots on 52 acres,with the following features: • Coving (curbing) design of streets • Mix of lots and sizes • All homes backing up onto open space, with a minimum of 25' between rear walls • Trails throughout the subdivision • Limited view of homes from Preserve area, no direct access into Preserve from subdivision • An additional half-acre archaeological park The condominium component will consist of 124 units on 14 acres, with open areas between the buildings. The accompanying garages will be designed so that all the parking spaces are contained within the building and the only pavement seen are the few required guest spots and a single driveway into each building. Access into the communal garage area for each building will have one garage door entrance and one garage door exit. Inside is a large turn-around area and individual enclosed garages around the interior perimeter. Each individual garage has direct access to the entry for the corresponding unit. There are 8 units per building, and no exterior stairwells. F:\MINUTES\DRB\2006\03-14-06 Minutes.doc Draft approved 04/11/06 • 03/14/2006 Development Review Board Minutes Page 4 of 11 The commercial component has the following features: • A central neighborhood mall design • Reduction of square footage from 94,000 square feet to 85,000 square feet • Parking and support services for the Preserve • An archaeological display area • Main pedestrian access from Rancho Vistoso Boulevard (2,300 homes within a mile of center) • Varying elevations (terraces) of the site connected by slopes, walking paths and divided by landscaped areas, and brick patios • Parking space requirements arrived at by analysis of shared parking based on percentage and peak demand analysis. Using the conservative figure of 10% shared parking, peak demand, and weekend and weekday demand, 326 parking spaces are planned. The preservation component addresses the following: • Incorporation of protection restrictions on the plat (designation of the core site as an archaeological preserve, prohibiting homeowners from excavating or disturbing the ground, and restricting access from the homes into the Preserve) • Reconsideration of preliminary plat to address any potential major archaeological discovery • Recorded conservation easement • Preserve wall • HOA CCR's • Detailed architectural guidelines • Monitoring organization Mr. Solomon explained that school children brought to the archaeological site would be led by a guide; the number of students/participants would be restricted, and they would gather in the archaeological display area and then access the larger site using the trial. A master association will govern the entire property, and there will be a sub-association for commercial, single family, and condos. Neighborhood meetings was conducted, and only positive input was received. Chair Caswell expressed concern that the wall was of a height that might not discourage residents from going onto the 13-acre site. Rancho Vistoso CCR's might prohibit access, but people don't tend to stay within the CCR's. Mr. Solomon said the wall, which is being funded by a grant from the Tohono O'odham Nation, will be built on the developer's side of the property line. A maintenance easement will be granted. For now, the wall height is expected to be 42"to 48"but it could be raised to 5 feet. The trail in the Preserve will not be right along the perimeter. There are existing disturbed areas or dirt roads that run along the Preserve. The current thought is to use the disturbed areas for the trails instead of disturbing other portions of the Preserve. F:\MINUTES\DRB\2006\03-14-06 Minutes.doc Draft approved 04/11/06 410 03/14/2006 Development Review Board Minutes Page 5 of 11 Vice Chair Sturmon asked if and where landscaping will be placed along the wall, either inside or outside. Mr. Solomon said that no additional planting will be done inside the Preserve unless it is for maintaining the trail. Wall is going to be built to blend in as much as possible. Member Zinkin expressed concern about mitigation of dust produced by wind going through the Preserve. Mr. Solomon explained that Desert Archaeology will be preparing a mitigation plan just like for grading and drainage. No further specifics are known now. Pamela Holt introduced the staff report. The uniqueness of this project is that the four components (preserve, commercial, condos, and single family home subdivision) are being planned and presented together. This is not a traditional mixed-use site. Ms. Holt touched on the unique elements of each of the four components, explained the method at which the number of parking spaces had been arrived at, explained applicant's alternative parking analysis, and described the design of the loading zones and passenger drop-offs. Ms. Holt discussed pedestrian connections, as well as changes in grade and elevations and height restrictions to specific lots in the single family subdivision. The proposed trade, which is the creation of a Honeybee Archaeological Preserve, will result in meaningful open space. Screen wall design will be brought before DRB as part of the architectural review process. Staff is requesting a Native Plant Mitigation Plan for the entire site be provided at one time, rather than in phases, particularly with regard to preservation of the ironwoods trees found on site. Staff recommends approval of the Vistoso Town Center project with the conditions listed in Exhibit B. Paul Keesler, Division Review Manager, gave a report on the contents in Exhibit B. Chair Caswell, referring to Item C on Exhibit B, expressed concern that whenever there is a special event in Rancho Vistoso, the community bears the cost of the clean-up and related needs. She suggested a provision that the Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood Association be notified of the event and that the event be coordinated through them. Member Panas expressed concern about the congestion created by off-site parking. Ms. Holt said that the responsibility for providing off-site overflow parking amenities is the Town's rather than the applicant, and deferred to Mr. Vella and Ms. More. Mr. Vella explained that Condition C provides that a plan has to be in place before there are any special events. In response to Chair Caswell earlier concern, coordination of special events with the HOA would be an appropriate condition to add. Ms. Sarah More explained that one of the good things about the peak flow parking analysis is in relation to events that might be related to the Preserve, which the developer is not necessarily responsible for. There are approximately 100 extra spaces on the weekends, and the developer will in effect be providing some extra spaces if there are public events related to the Preserve. RECESS taken at 7:30 Meeting RESUMED at 7:32 F:\MINUTES\DRB\2006\03-14-06 Minutes.doc Draft approved 04/11/06 03/14/2006 Development Review Board Minutes Page 6 of 11 Member Panas asked, and was offered, clarification on the location of the dumpster routes, dumpster locations, and traffic flow. Member Panas inquired about any plans for future Transit plans for that area. Ms. Keesler explained that presently he was not aware of any plans for Transit, but would check with Ms. Kidwell to see if there is a Transit plan. Member Sturmon inquired about the resultant flow pattern potentially created by the plan having only one access and one exit for trash and commercial trucks. Ms. Keesler said that the southern commercial parking lot provides free-flow on Rancho Vistoso Boulevard, with adequate egress and ingress from all directions. The northern parking lot is right in, right out off of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard, but as cars traverse the parking lot they will be able to exit onto Moore Road. Member Kandetzke requested verification that development standards for mixed-use property in the Rancho Vistoso PAD were not in place. Ms. Holt said that there were no mixed-use standards. The Town Center site is designated in the Rancho Vistoso PAD as a Town Center. Since the Town Center itself does not have any development standards, staff and the applicant looked to the high density and community commercial standards in the Rancho Vistoso PAD. Member Kandetzke asked who would be involved in any eventual formal process to amend the Rancho Vistoso PAD to accommodate the mixed uses. Ms. Holt replied that this wasn't a mixed use development and that the project consists of three separate entities. Town Attorney Garrahan further clarified that this project is not a mixed-use development in the sense that lawyers and planners understand the term. This is a classic PAD, which has various uses in different parts of that planned area development. Member Zinkin asked for clarification on the total number of acres, stated in one place as 52 but in another as 41.92. Applicant Solomon provided a breakdown of the acreage, as follows: 10 acres for commercial, 14 acres for the condos, 13 acres for the Preserve, the remainder (stated as 52 by the applicant)would be for single family homes, for a total of 87 total acres. Member Zinkin, referring to page 6 on the staff report, asked where lot 120 was and if this lot was affected. Ms. Holt explained that staff and applicant had focused on lots 121, 122, 123, 124, and 54. There are no height restrictions on Lot 120. Member Zinkin stated his understanding was that both entries into the development were going to be gated, and was told he was correct. He asked if there was going to be an area wide enough for a school bus to go in and out. Ms. Holt explained that school buses would not be going into the private community, but they will likely pull out onto the right-of-way. Ms. Keesler clarified that in order to handle the school bus situation, per the Oro Valley Subdivision Street Standards, a turn-around large enough to accommodate these actions has to happen between the public right-of-way and a gated private street. Not all of these streets have that particular turn-around. Some are exit only and will not allow any ingress except for emergency vehicles. There are two access points that allow a half-moon turn-around which a bus would be able to access outside of the gate. The buses will be able to get off the road, but whether the actual HOA through their CCR's allows the school buses to go into the gates communities, that is another matter. F:\MINUTES\DRB\2006\03-14-06 Minutes.doc Draft approved 04/11/06 4101 03/14/2006 Development Review Board Minutes Page 7 of 11 Member Panas asked if all conditions on Exhibit B can be addressed prior to going to Town Council. Ms. Holt replied that staff has been working with applicant, and believes the non- engineering conditions will be met in time. Ms. Keesler stated that the engineering conditions must be met before staff recommends approval. Mr. Vella said the applicant has shown how those conditions will be met, and he expects full compliance prior to going to Town Council. Member Sturmon, referring to Item 6, asked if the mitigation plan for native plants in any way affect the overall development. Ms. Holt replied that it would not affect the development that she is aware of. She added that an on-site and off-site mitigation plan is required. Mr. Vella stated all of the landscape issues will be addressed in the Landscape Plan. Member Zinkin asked if there was a possibility of having lots moved because of the plant mitigation. Ms. Holt explained that that wasn't how staff was looking at it, that it was more a matter of moving trees. Chair Caswell opened the meeting to public comment for Agenda Item 2. Bill Adler, 10720 North Eagle Eye Place, commented that "mixed use" is not defined anywhere, that the definitions being used are only opinions, and that these discussions will continue until a definition for mixed use is included into the Code. Mr. Adler said his primary comment was that he believes the zoning for this property needs to be amended so that the ultimate project is more complementary to the historical nature of the property. Zoning on this property was established prior to the knowledge that this was a significant historical and archaeological site, and knowing what we now know, moving forward with the same density and intensity of use is inexcusable, as the development will damage the visual character of the property. Pam Sarpalius, 14721 N. Flagstone Drive, Chairman, and speaking on behalf of the Historic Preservation Commission. The Historic Preservation Commission reviewed Mr. Solomon's proposal on October 12, 2005. Their minutes document that a motion was made and seconded to fully endorse this proposed plan. The Historic Preservation Commission is very excited and looking forward to this project. They applaud Mr. Solomon's donation of the 13-acre core site and they feel that while this site could have been bulldozed and been lost forever, it will instead become the pride of Oro Valley. MOTION: Member Zinkin MOVED to recommend APPROVAL of OV 12- 05-28, subject to the engineering conditions set out in Exhibit B, subject to those engineering conditions being addressed prior to Town Council review, and on the condition that coordination of special events go through the Rancho Vistoso Homeowners' Association. Member Kandetzke SECONDED the motion. Motion passed 6-0. F:\MINUTES\DRB\2006\03-14-06 Minutes.doc Draft approved 04/11/06 1110 03/14/2006 Development Review Board Minutes Page 8 of 11 2. OV13-06-08,Justin Smith, representing Fry's Food and Drug,requests architecture approval for exterior building façade remolding, located at 10450 N. La Canada Drive,Parcel# 224-25-024J. Applicant Rick Redpath, 7400 East McDonald Drive, Scottsdale, Arizona, project architect, said staff reports are very thorough. Fry's Stores have found that doing a simultaneous inside and outside removal makes for a more successful project. There is a plan review going through the Building Department for an interior remodel of the store, running separate but parallel to the exterior remodel. Applicant offered the clarification that the renovation will retain about a foot and a half of the existing reddish-brown textured block. It is actually going to be about four feet, there will be a 4' wainscot. Applicant said that Fry's, throughout its remodeling projects, has tried to maintain consistency and somewhat of an identity. The proposed stone veneer has been consistent throughout their remodels, and they would very much prefer to use the stone veneer on the columns. Fry's would be willing to work with staff to match the color or type of stone as closely as possible. Applicants have met with the adjacent property owner, and applicant's initial color scheme was rejected because it wasn't compatible. Applicant is now matching exactly the color scheme and color palette, and adjacent property owner is in agreement with applicant as far as colors. The only thing in question is the stone veneer on the columns. Chair Caswell commented that some attention needs to be given to the store's dumpster area. Applicant said he would pass that information on to store operations. Pamela Holt introduced the staff report and elaborated on the need to integrate the two sites. The color palette is compatible. Applicant intends keeping about four feet of the exposed reddish- brown color and painting the remaining four feet. The proposed veneer stone is used only in one area at the Mercado site. The condition that the stone veneer not be used anywhere at the Fry's site was included because staff didn't feel that the use of the proposed stone veneer on the archway really ties the two sites together. Inclusion of the stone veneer would disrupt the transition between the two sites. Staff recommends approval of the project subject to conditions in Exhibit A. Ms. Holt clarified that the renovation is only for the Fry's store at this time, but it is possible that this renovation might encourage the adjacent shops to also renovate their facades. MOTION: Vice Chair Sturmon MOVED to approve OV 13-06-08 with the conditions specified in Exhibit A. Member Kandetzke SECONDED motion. Motion carried 6-0. DISCUSSION: Vice Chair Sturmon stated that when the Mercado development was reviewed, DRB struggled to have them F:\MINUTES\DRB\2006,03-14-06 Minutes.doc Draft approved 04/11/06 4110 410 03/14/2006 Development Review Board Minutes Page 9 of 11 conform to the Fry's design. The Mercado developer adapted everything as requested, and the stone veneer is a subject matter Fry's needs to reconsider, because DRB fought to have the Mercado adapt to the Fry's look. VOTE: Motion carried 6-0. 3. OV13-06-09, Robert Page, representing Jana and Brian Davies, requests architecture approval for exterior building façade remodeling, located at 7780 N. Oracle Road, Parcel # 225- 51-0130. Applicant Robert Page, 2102 North Country Club #9, representing Jana and Brian Davies, gave presentation. Owners recently purchased the property and want to address deterioration and improve appearance. Applicant concurs with staff's exhibit, but not fully understanding the comment regarding painting of the flat roof segments. The lighter paint color has a reflectivity of 62%. Applicant is requesting approval to drop that down the same color spectrum to the Dunn Edwards DE 6066, which is a 50% reflectivity. Owners also asked to change out an existing single door with a small window with one that will match the other two storefront doors. Vice Chair Sturrnon commented that the roof line seemed very flat, and asked if it would be difficult to add some shape at the top of the roof line. Applicant replied that this was an existing building that already has a porch, so he doesn't know how another porch on top of that would enhance the architecture. Owner's intention was to clean up the deterioration and dress it up, don't know that they actually looking at a facade renovation. Pamela Holt introduced the staff report. Staff recommends approval subject to conditions on Exhibit A. Member Kandetzke requested clarification regarding the request to change the paint reflectivity from 62% to 50%. Ms. Holt explained that Condition # 3 is specified as a reflectivity of 60%, pursuant to Oro Valley Zoning Code Commercial Section 21.8, but it is up to the discretion of the Board to pick any number they choose. Member Zinkin asked if applicant was saying that if he has to go to 60%he has to change colors. Applicant stated that was correct. The color would be located under the overhang which is mostly in shade, so the reflectivity is not all critical, but they are willing to drop it down to the next color in that spectrum, which was the number 6066, with a 50% reflectivity. Mr. Vella added that 60% is a code requirement. Ms. Holt further added that 60% is the Code requirement, but if the applicant is proposing a new color that has a lower reflectivity, of 50% for example, that meets the code requirements. MOTION: Member Panas MOVED to recommend approval of OV13-06-09,with the conditions specified in Exhibit A. F:\M.INUTES\DR.B\2006\03-14-06 Minutes.doc Draft approved 04/11/06 03/14/2006 Development Review Board Minutes Page 10 of 11 Move SECONDED by Member Kandetzke. Motion carried 6-0. 4. OV3-04-03A, John Piccoli, representing Ace Hardware Inc., requests approval to amend the sign criteria for Placita De Oro Plaza, located at the Southwest corner of Tangerine Road and First Avenue, Parcel #224-02-170A. Applicant John Piccoli, 6341 N. Placita De Eduardo, presented the reasons for the request to amend this site's sign criteria, developed by Evergreen Devco in 2004. Ace Hardware lettering is not a uniform height. Ace uses a standard unit of measure based on the "e" in "Ace." The rest of the lettering is based on the proportion of the "e." The "e" is 85% the height of the "A." Following the formula, the"H" in"Hardware" isn't even half the height of the "A" and the lower case letters aren't even a third of the height of the "A." Going strictly by the Code, with a 48" high A', the "H" in "Hardware"would be 23"high and the lower case letters would be 18" high. The building is 50%higher than all the other adjacent structures, creating signage that consists of 17" lettering on a 30' long wall. Potentially, an adjacent tenant, with a substantially smaller store could end up having a larger sign than the Ace store sign. Applicant displayed the proposed sign lettering, showing a 61" high "A" and a rendering of the day and night time appearance of the sign on the façade of the building. Jonathan Lew introduced the staff report. Mr. Lew stated that the applicant's proposal meets code, and staff recommends approval with the conditions on Exhibit A. Member Kandetzke asked if the 5' sign was outside the code. Mr. Lew explained that the Oro Valley Zoning Code doesn't specify a maximum letter height, it specifies a maximum signage allowance. Ms. More clarified there is an approved sign plan for this site and those numbers are in the staff report. That plan is what is before DRB for revision. The Code itself would allow the sign of the size that is proposed. Chair Caswell asked if the site's management company, Evergreen Devco, is aware of the request for this variance. Mr. Lew replied that this company has recently changed ownership. Applicant clarified that last year the property was purchased by Diversified Partners, from Phoenix, and they are aware and in agreement with proposed change request. Member Panas asked for the square footage of the Walgreen, which Mr. Lew said was 15,000 square feet, and verified that this variance would only be allowable within this criteria of this site under this ruling. Mr. Vella added that Condition 1 specifies that the 61" letter height is only for Ace Hardware and no other users or pads on this site. One of the reasons for staffs recommendation for approval is that Ace Hardware is the furthest away from the road. Member Panas verified that the only place there will be signage is on the front of the building. MOTION: Member Stun-non MOVED to recommend approval of OV3-04-03A, subject to conditions in Exhibit A. Member Zinkin SECONDED motion. Motion passed 5-1 (Panas). F:\MINUTES\DRB\2006\03-14-06 Minutes.doc Draft approved 04/11/06 IPS 03/14/2006 Development Review Board Minutes Page 11 of 11 5. Discussion and possible action regarding assigned representation on the DRB Sign Review Committee. The reason for this item is that with the Chair's upcoming departure, more people need to get involved with the duties of the Sign Committee. Currently Mr. Sturmon, Ms. Caswell and Mr. Buette are on the committee. Time involved is once a month, unless there isn't anything to discuss. The purpose of the Sign Committee is to go through initial presentation by an applicant to decrease the length of discussion at the regular DRB meeting. Member Panas volunteered to serve on the Sign Committee. 6. Discussion regarding motions and the use of code specified findings. Board members were given a copy of Oro Valley Zoning Code Section 22.6, which outlines criteria on which to base decisions by the DRB. Town Attorney Garrahan said this matter came up out a concern of creating a clear record on recommendations made by the DRB. Since decisions made at the DRB level can be appealed, staff recommends there be a clear record of any DRB recommendation as well as the reason for the decision. The standard for assessing decisions of Boards and Commissions is whether they are arbitrary and capricious. It is difficult to know whether a decision is arbitrary and capricious if the public doesn't know why the decision was made. Staff recommends that, whenever possible, Board members refer to the Criteria for grounds for one of their motions. When the staff report refers to the criteria for their recommendation, and the DRB follows along with a staff recommendation, nobody needs to go to any extra work. But in situations in which the Board diverges from staff recommendation or where the staff recommendation does not refer back to the Criteria, then it would be helpful if the motion maker would refer to specific criteria as a basis for the motion. Further discussion took place on when to use this recommended method of motion submission. STAFF REPORT Nothing to report. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Member Zinkin MOVED to adjourn the March 14, 2006, Development Review Board Meeting Regular Session at 8:57 p.m. Member Panas SECONDED the motion. Motion carried 6-0. Prepared by: Arinda Asper Office Assistant F:\.MINUTES\DR.B\2006\03-14-06 Minutes.doc Draft approved 04/11/06