Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOV31108 oQo �1.EY Aq�2o2.9 °UNDED.N91 DEV REVIEW - SIGN SUBMIT SIGN CRITERIA Resubmittal? N Development Review Transmittal Town of Oro Valley Development Infrastructure Services 11000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley,AZ 85737 Review Agency: **DEV REV- SIGN SUBMITTAL** Transmittal Out: Friday, December 02, 2011 Transmittal Due: Friday, December 16, 2011 Project Information INREVU Project Number: OV311-008 Parcel Number: Project Title: SIGN CRITERIA- DOME BUILDING Lots (if applies): Location: Applicant: DC ORACLE LLC Phone: Zoning: E-Mail Address: Oro Valley Planner: PLANNER TO BE DETERMINED Date Information (as applies) DRB SubCommittee: DRB Hearing: TC Hearing: Additional Comments: Written comments need to be returned to a Permit Technician. If you have no comments,please sign and date this form, and return it via FAX(520) 742-1022. For questions or comments, call (520) 229-4800 or email sgay@orovalleyaz.gov, cbakerraJorovalleyaz.gov or wvicens@orovalleyaz.gov.. Friday,December 02,2011 *"DEV REV-SIGN SUBMITTAL** Approved Without Comments By: Date: JUN-8-2011 13:12 FROM: TO:3236786 P.1/3 Development and Infrastructure Services • Planning Division =�y 11000 N La Canada Drive,Oro Valley,Arizona 85737 • 520-229-4815 • 520-742-1022(Fax) %NoEa.'r ADDiication for Sign Criteria OATE: .1 o OV CASE NO*: CA 511 r 0 OS (office use only) PP NI-it iR the applicant/owner's responsibility to ensure all private rules and regulIIrions of the subdivision adhcrodj.Contact your t{OA or property management company to deteri'nine all applicable requirements, Milker ��� APPLICANT: E p L-L� t� ADDRESS: ` 7"-4* A\ - _ CITY: j 4L STATE: � — ZIP:SS1C)* TELPHONE: -14QO -0)'SAX: 4r"3‘. .- EMAIL: PROJECT NAME: " 1''1E U%1.-b 1 Q r SUBDIVISION: _ ADDRESS/LOCATION: 464*-f iFJbe-ACIe ZONING: F,(,, PARCEL/TAX CODE#: 2-Z5-13 -o o 1C PROPERTY OWNER: ADDRESS: 2.125 S • CrAter_o CITY: 1^v►C-SO t� STATE: A 2- ZIP: <651 1 TELEPHONE: 5f. W 11,O?'S—FAX: EMAIL: SIGNATURE: DATE: �" if Signs for businesses located within a Commercial and/or Industrial District, Complex or buildings designed for multiple occupancy shall be coordinated so that a consistent design theme is established and maintained A Sign Criteria shall he written to reflect the general sign regulations as written in the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised Chapter 28, Signs. Application for a Sign Criteria shall require the approval of the Development Review Board prior to the issuance of any sign permits.A checklist of requirements for submittal is attached along with the required fees. Revised 11-20-08 JUN-8-2011 13:12 FROM: To:3236786 P.2/3 L SIGN CRITERIA This Sign Criteria is established for the purpose of assuring that (the "Center") will be an outstanding commercial development with distinctive and compatible signs for the benefit of all owners and occupants. All signs must be integrated with the Shopping Center's architectural character and designed in a manner that will not create a nuisance or diminish the visibility and/or value of other Parcels. Endeavors have been made to work within the requirements of the Town of Oro Valley sign ordinances while creating unique designs that are architecturally compatible with the Center and make a strong identity statement. All signs within the Center must conform to the Oro Valley sign code and the standards outlined in this Sign Criteria. Conformance will be strictly enforced and nonconforming installation or unapproved signage must be brought into conformance at the expense of the violating party. General Requirements Ala signs that are intended to be placed in or on the Center will be reviewed by the master developer, DC ORACLE, LLC or its Assignee( ) for compatibility with these guidelines.Each building Owner/Occupant will receive a copy of these guidelines before designing signs. Plans must be approved in writing by DC ORACLE, LLC prior to installation. DC ORACLES's approval of such plans does not constitute a representation. or warranty that such plans are in compliance with applicable governmental requirements. Compliance with all governmental requirements is the sole responsibility of each Owner/Occupant. Standards and Requirements • Each Owner/Occupant must submit 2 sets oFdetailed drawings of all signs at least 15 days prior to submitting for permits •After the proposal is reviewed, DC ORACLE, LLC will return one set of drawings marked either"Approved," "Approved as Noted,"or"Revise and Resubmit." Approved Owner/Occupant is permitted to proceed with sign construction/installation. Approved as Noted -Owner/Occupant must make any revisions noted on plans before proceeding with sign construction installation. Revise and Resubmit-Drawings will be returned with comments and should be revised accordingly. Owner/Occupant must then resubmit for another review. JUN-8-2011 13:12 FROM: TO:3236786 P.3{3 • Sign content shall be restricted to the identification of business or service located on a Parcel. • All signs shall be made of durable and long-lasting materials. •No exposed neon tubing, ballasts, crossovers, raceways, conduits, conductors or transformers are permitted,except conduitt any under-canopy signs(which must be painted to match the canopy). APPROVED BY: �L DQ- .c- TOWN OF ORO VALLEY DEVELOPMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES 11000 N.LA CANADA DRIVE ORO VALLEY,AZ 85737 PHONE: 229-4800 FAX: 742-1022 RECEIPT ****************************************************************************** REFERENCE NUMBER: OV311-008 RECEIPT #11P00265 SITE ADDRESS: 8444 N ORACLE RD OV TAXCODE: 225-13-007C DATE: 12/02/2011 TIME: 01:13 PM COMP TYPE: DEV REVIEW-SIGN SUBMIT TYPE: SC DESCRIPTION: SIGN CRITERIA-DOME BUILDING APPLICANT: DC ORACLE LLC OWNER: DC ORACLE LLC Notation: Receipt By: WVJ ***** ******************************************************************** *************** WVJ PAID BY: Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 1287 350. 00 TOTAL: 350.00 FEES PAID: Description Account Code Current Pmts Sign Permits 00000010-3013 350.00 TOTAL: 350.00 Account#: Ending Balance: $ JPLLEY ARi� 'ouNDED 19A Development and Infrastructure Services December 16, 2011 DC Oracle, LLC 2125 S. Craycroft Tucson, AZ 85711 Re: First Review: DC Oracle, LLC (Dome Building) Sign Criteria, located at 8444 N. Oracle Road, OV311-008. Dear Sir or Madam, Thank you for submitting the sign criteria for the "Dome Building". Based on a formal review, staff offers the following comments which are intended to assist you in preparing a resubmittal for Conceptual Design Review Board (CDRB) review: 1. The location map submitted is too specific for a sign criteria. The submitted map labels signs A, B and C. That is the type of site plan submitted for a sign permit. A sign criteria map should only show the location of the development and location of future or existing wall and freestanding signs. 2. Provide name of the development and the address. 3. Fill in the blank lines on the sign criteria document. 4. Please add examples of permitted materials (e.g. metal (aluminum), plastic, wood, etc.) for signs. The term, "all signs shall be made of durable..." is not specific enough. 5. Provide additional detail regarding the type of signs, colors and illumination that can be used on the site. The graphics submitted are something that would be submitted for a specific permit but are only useful as supplementary graphics to the text of the sign criteria. A sign criteria and its graphics should be written to accommodate tenants today and in the future. The submitted graphics have some discrepancies in the colors. Purple is shown under "color specifications" but other colors are shown under "color palette". 6. Please include the following details in the sign criteria: Wall Signs a. Quantity: How many wall signs can a tenant have? b. Address each building group of the development. Will the building in the back ever have a tenant with signs? For example, a tenant in the rear portions of the main building may want signage on the front of the building. Define whether that would be allowed and, if so, how. Page 1 of 3 c. Type of sign: Use this section to specifically address the allowed or prohibit types of signs (e.g. reverse pan channel, pan channel, cabinet, etc.) d. Area of Sign: List the size allowances. This section should define the maximum sizes of the overall sign, letter heights, number of lines or other size restrictions specific to your development. e. Address the use of logos and size allowances. Define if a logo allowance will be a percentage of the proposed sign or of the allowed sign area. f. Location: Define where you want tenants to place signs. This site may what to consider prohibiting signs on the south elevations facing the residential neighbors. g. Illumination: Define the type and colors allowed. Will day/night plex be allowed? What is the intended color of the sign at night? h. Time of illumination turn off should be per current Zoning Code. i. List the colors of the signs. List each component of the sign i.e. faces, returns, trim cap, etc. Indentify colors with name and number of the color. j. Will raceways be allowed? 7. The code allows many types of freestanding signs such as monument, directional, directory, entry way and pedestrian tenant directory. You may wish to address these specific types of signs in this submittal. You may wish to consider wall plaques as a permitted sign type. 8. Please review each type of allowed permanent sign and provide the following details for each type of sign: a. Quantity b. Area c. Height d. Location e. Illumination f. Colors and materials g. List any sign types that you wish to be excluded a certain sign type. Omitting a sign type without specifically prohibiting the sign could be viewed as allowing the sign under the Town's Zoning Code allowances. 9. Window Signs: All window signs shall conform to the standards set forth in Chapter 28 of the Zoning Code. 10. Temporary signs shall be per the Oro Valley Zoning Code. 11. Provide a color sample, including name of color and color ID numbers, for all allowed colors and materials. Please resubmit three (3) copies of the revised sign criteria with the above and attached corrections. The sign criteria will be place on the next available Conceptual Design Review Board (CDRB) agenda if the aforementioned issues have been substantially addressed. Please feel free to contact me if I can be of assistance. Page 2 of 3 Sincerely, 7/2-111r )/21/16 Matt Michels, AICP Senior Planner cc: Permit Technicians Patty Hayes S:\PERMPLUS\DOCS\OV311-008\P formal comments 12-16-11.doc Planning Permitting Inspection & Compliance Engineering Operations Transit (520)229-4821 (520)229-4815 (520)229-4815 (520) 229-4894 (520)229-5070 (520)229-4990 Caring for our heritage, our community, our future. 11000 N.La Canada Drive•Oro Valley,Arizona 85737 fax: (520)742-1022 •www.orovallevdis.com Page 3 of 3 Page 1 of 2 ayes Patty, From: Hayes, Patty Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 12:52 PM To: 'DOUGLAS BAKER' Subject: RE: 8444 -8454 N Oracle Revised Sign Criteria-from Sign-A-Rama! Attachments: 8444 N Oracle Sign Criteria.doc Doug, I reviewed the submitted sign criteria and had some corrections and suggestions. As we spoke about last week I reformatted the document for easier reading. I grouped sign type into one section, illumination into another and so on. The areas where I corrected or added text are highlighted in red. Most of the changes in red are to bring the criteria to code such as: • Removed cabinet wall signs. • Removed wood wall signs. • Changed white panels on monument to light beige. White panels aren't allowed by code. • Added some details about the monument. All code standards. • You will need to review the revised criteria with your owner and make sure it is okay. • Change the monument panels from white to light beige (if that's the color you want to use) • Submit a color palette matching the colors you defined. • Define"text boxes". You used that term in the wall sign type. Is that the common term? Do you have an example of text boxes? I will need this sign criteria returned along with the items/changes listed above no later than Tuesday October 23rd in order to place this on the November 13th meeting. Patty Hayes Zoning Plans Examiner Development& Infrastructure Services Department Town of Oro Valley 520-229-4819 (office) 520-742-1022 (fax) From: DOUGLAS BAKER [mailto:dougjbaker©msn.com] Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 1:49 PM To: Hayes, Patty Subject: 8444 - 8454 N Oracle Revised Sign Criteria -from Sign-A-Rama! Hi Patty! Ok, here's the revised sign criteria! Please reply so I know you got this and so i can answer any questions and make any further changes you think will help! Thanks! -Doug 10/17/2012 Page 1 of 1 Hayes, Patty From: Hayes, Patty Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 9:21 AM To: 'DOUGLAS BAKER' Subject: RE: 8444 N Oracle Rd Sign Criteria Revised -from Sign-A-Rama! Doug, Couple of other things that need to be fixed on the Sign Criteria. Add white as a color in your color palette since it's identified in the text. Also add a line on the color chart page about allowing gold trim cap since that is what the Orthodontic sign already has. Can you get that one sheet to me ASAP? Thanks. Patty Hayes Zoning Plans Examiner Development& Infrastructure Services Department Town of Oro Valley 520-229-4819 (office) 520-742-1022 (fax) From: DOUGLAS BAKER [mailto:dougjbaker@msn.com] Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 5:32 PM To: Hayes, Patty Subject: 8444 N Oracle Rd Sign Criteria Revised - from Sign-A-Rama! Hi Patty! Ok, I have revised the sign criteria, and all the changes I made are in BLUE, mostly accepting the red changes you made. (i did accept all the changes you made). Please review and reply! Thanks for all your help! -Doug Douglas J. Baker SIGN-A-RAMA 5819 N Oracle Rd Tucson, AZ 85704 P 520-887-9703 F 520-887-9706 E douqjbaker@msn.com 10/31/2012 x � -7 ' TOWN OF ORO VALLEY CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING DATE: November 13` 2012 TO: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW BOARD FROM: Patty Hayes, Zoning Plans Examiner SUBJECT: Sign Criteria for the Hacienda Bella, located on the eoa1 side of Oracle Road, o third of a mile south of Handy Road at 8444 North Oracle Road. OV311~008 SUMMARY: The applicant has submitted the proposed Sign Criteria to establish sign standards for permanent vvaU, monument and directional signs for this multi-tenant property, The Conceptual Design Review Board (CDRB) reviews Sign Criteria for final approval, unless a decision is appealed to Town Council. A Sign Criteria is a set of proposed sign standards for a development that complies with the provisions of the Zoning Code and Addendum A. Design Standards. The intent of o Sign Criteria is to ensure that all oignmge within a multi-tenant development is consistent in terms of deaign, color and Illumination. BACKGROUND: Site Conditions The subject property is a single parcel- oornrnon|y know as the Dome Bui|d\ng, with two (2) buildings zoned R- 8 Multi-Family Residential District. The R'G zoning oUovva business and professional office uses. * The property is e 17 aona site with a single entrance from [)rmde Road shared with the northern parcel. * Both buildings were built in 1971 and were annexed into the Town in 1990. Land Use West R4 Townhouse Residential Casitas Del Oro Norte Townhouses (across Oracle Road-) North R6 Multi-Family Residential Rancho Catalina Offices (home of the Teen Challencie offices East Rl-36 Single Family Rancho Catalina subdivision Residential � South /uw'xponeu Proposal � w Provides for one (1) monument sign and one (1) directional sign . * Establishes seven (7) colors for use on vvaU signs and the monument sign. Process � | Section 21.5.13 of the Zoning Code provides that e Sign Criteria shall be reviewed and must be approved by the COF<B prior to the issuance of o permit. The abandonja proposed in the revised sign criteria will regulate all allowable signs for this site. r TOWN OF ORO VALLEY CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Paqe 2 of 3 Previous Project Approvals • The Orthodontic wall sign as shown on Attachment 3 was temporarily allowed to be installed in 2011 with the agreement that the sign may permanently remain only after a Sign Criteria allowing the installed colors was approved. • The Sign Criteria indicates that the landlord has the authority to make modifications to the criteria at any time. This is not a permissible statement as the CDRB has to approve any changes to Sign Criteria. A condition has been included on Attachment 1 which requires removal of this statement from the Sign Criteria. ZONING CODE COMPLIANCE • Zoning Code Section 28.3.C.1, Various sign colors are permitted, except for fluorescent or iridescent colors. The proposed Sign Criteria consists of seven (7) colors and does not contain fluorescent or iridescent colors. The Criteria also allows tenants to use their corporate or trademarked colors. The proposed Sign Criteria is consistent with this standard. • Zoning Code 28.2.8.4.a, Review of a Sign Criteria shall be guided by the overall character of the entire development, including landscaping. architecture, topography, uses, and design. The building has an historic appearance with the Spanish style aged slump block, red tile window awnings and antique bronze metallic colored dome. This property, which is an office use, abuts residential neighborhoods on two sides of the property and an office building on the north side with frontage on Oracle Road. Monument and directory sign design is consistent with design character of the project. ANALYSIS OF CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW PRINCIPLES AND DESIGN STANDARDS Conceptual Site Design Principles The following Design Principles are notable for this application: • Zoning Code 22.9.D.5.b.iv, Sign colors, design and placement shall be complementary and integral to the project's architectural and site design themes. The proposed bronze (duranodic) and black colors will compliment the dark bronze features of the building. The other five proposed colors will allow for contrasting colors to help clearly identify the tenants. Addendum A Design Standards The following Design Standards are notable for this application: • Section 2.1.F.2, Project identification and sign elements shall incorporate architectural treatment and project unifying elements which are integrated with the overall design of the project in terms of style, materials, color and theme. ' � � . x ` ` TOWN OF ORO VALLEY CONCEPTUAL DESIGN-REVIEW BOARD Page 3 of 3 The proposed rnonunnerd sign will use the existing red o|urnp block base which blends with both � buildings and has designed o cabinet to blend with the building colors and mimic the donne feature. The Sign Criteria submitted by the applicant establishes an integrated design theme for bui|ding, monument and directional signs. w Section 2.1.F. 4. Location and placement of building mounted signs shall be /n/eQoeAed into building architecture. Building signs shall be consistent i/ terms of materials and construction The front (west) elevation of the main building has m beige stucco sign bond at the top of the parapet wall. This banding provides an ideal location for building signs The applicant has limited the location of vvoU signs to the north and west elevations of both buildings. Signs facing the east and south residential neighborhoods will be prohibited. * Section 2./.F.5. As feasible, sign colors shall utilize the project color palette approved as part of the Conceptual Design for the project. The red o|urnp block and heavy timber lintels and window shade elements are part of the building's original construction from 1971. The beige stucco and dark hirn window and door thrn was pad of an exterior remodel approved by [)RB in 2008. Some of the proposed oo|mro blend with the colors on the building and others provide contrast. CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION: The CORB should closely consider the design mtandarda, highlighted herein, /n evaluating the proposed sign criteria, The criteria should be approved if the board finds compliance with these standards. � SUGGESTED MOTION: The CDRB may wish to consider one of the following suggested rnctiono- | move to approve [}V31 1-OO8. e Sign Criteria for Hacienda BeUa, based on the finding that the proposed Sign Chterio, as oonditioned, is in conformance with the applicable Zoning Code and Design Standards and Princip|es, subject to the conditions in Attachment 1 (with the following modifications ) DR I move to deny the sign criteria for Hacienda Be|}e` based on the finding that the proposal does not meet the Design Principles and Standards. specifically Attachments: 1. Conditions ofApproval 2. Proposed Sign Criteria 3. Photos of Building Elevations Chad Daines, Principal Planner o��nnnnn/uo\uoo,u>v311 ouauz_ooRoatonnopou// 13'12owc Attachment 1 Conditions of Approval Sign Criteria for Hacienda Bella 1. Only one color from the approved color palette can be used for sign letters and characters on any one line of sign copy. 2. Wall signs on the south and east building elevations are prohibited. 3. Wall signs on the Dome feature shall not be allowed. 4. The 3rd sentence related to the Landlord modifications on the Sign Criteria cover sheet shall be removed. PZ PROJECT M GER Sign Criteria For 8444 - 8454 N. Oracle Rd. Oro Valley, AZ 85704 "Hacienda Bella" Parcel 225-13-007C DC ORACLE LLC 2125 S CRAYCROFT RD TUCSON AZ 85711-6624 . II; '1 • f, 41, llt. .' i . .„..: a ' ..,i ' 1 i I' ' 40 Ildt ii I ' .1 04 pr , ° 1. 4 40#tet 1111* - :*i 411 illftii;-•4604. . I 1 - ' -.i : a •r • r • a f.Itti , P.4•it: •,i,*AA - -.,HilY41044t 00, 1 t,-A , . i -A „ 4 illi .ft . , ‘,.,,,,, ,: 'IV . t ''' . Vor ' if:";fki •. - .) 1 N i " * ..0.0 ,..7 ,. i, z 4, ..., ,. -wee. - 4 Alb These criteria have been established to insure design compatibility among all signs at 8444 N. Oracle Rd. Conformance to these criteria will be strictly enforced. Sign permits must be approved by the Town of Oro Valley prior to installation of the signage. Any signage installed that is not approved by The Landlord and not permitted by the Town of Oro Valley shall be removed or brought into conformance by the applicant and/or it's sign contractor at tenant's expense. All signage must conform to the Oro Valley Sign Code (OVZCR Chapter 28). APPROy %3%a C/P 1 oo r DA PZGTMGR PLAN I#N7:::R•71:14.' - . • . ,.._ _,,,,.......-_ ,, , „, , , ,,,.. 0. - .0.4_, *SITE .. 4 N ORACL 0 .... A ...-1- 0,, -7:,......1 ......-_,•:..1.r. 8444 _ 845 z < . > ' , , ,4111 ' -, A' . TUCSON, AZ... %FA : . . iv .... 4,04- M - 31PIr 40-1 4 * ; sis a ..,. tr,.. . , . .-,...., [I . SECONDARY.. —• i tNORTH FACING lit# 4.., WALL SIGN AREA , ..--,.. cs -.....„, , . - . - % ...... Teen Challenge ,, N. .,... .. of Anzona er _.: 8*. , ING) * 9 • RY PRIMAR ' 1st. ..„._:-, ;.. - vow WALL SI r * , N: i . .I 4 ACING G EA....., .... . , -- o• . .----- . --....... , --.........._ .. .., . ' PRIMARY (W ' G)- l'*-11 i E • i.;gt - -. ' 1, „ II WALL SIGN qs, a ' likiiir . ',._1111411.1 _ MONUMENT .‘ _.. t wo ft 4.,... ii SIGN .1 20 m At 101t4 c Edit in i3oo4ile rola!)Mak Wall Signs Types of Wall Signage Allowed • Allowed Wall Signage includes Pan Channel, Reverse Pan Channel, Molded or Formed Dimensional Letters (Gemini Plastic) and Flat Cutout Acrylic or Metal Letters. • Signs may be made of metal (which must be properly sealed so it will not bleed rust), or plastic, but not foam. • Tenant's logos may be used along with Letters and descriptive text boxes. A text box is a single shape (eg: rectangle, oval) with tag line or description of product or services. For a Reverse Pan channel text box sign, the letters can be cut through the face and backed with white acrylic, or just have vinyl lettering on the face. For Channel text box signs, the shape would be with channel letter construction and illuminated through the face. Size of the text box may not be larger than the primary company name. • Raceways are allowed and must be painted to match the color of the building surface on which it is installed Illumination • Signage may be internally or halo illuminated with neon or LEDs, or non-illuminated. • Open faced neon signs are specifically prohibited. • Reverse Pan channel letters shall have amber halo illumination • Other colors may be considered if they are corporate or trademarked company colors. • Illumination is only allowed between the hours of 5 am and 11 pm and must be turned off at close of business per Town of Oro Valley Code. Colors • 3M translucent vinyl colors Red (3630-33), White, Black, Yellow(3630-015), Green 3630-26), or Blue (3630-36). • Reverse Pan Channel letters may be painted Duranodic Brown(3630-69) or to match any of the above mentioned 3M colors, Quantity • One wall sign is allowed for each Tenant except for those Tenants who have frontage along both the primary and secondary wall sign areas as shown on the preceding site plan, who may have one sign on each allowed wall area. • Tenants who do not have frontage along either of the two sign areas may be allowed space on the Monument Sign. • Size of the signage allowed is based on the Tenant's frontage along their exterior wall, with a maximum of 1 sq ft of signage for each linear ft of tenant frontage along their exterior wall. Signage may not extend longer than 80% of Tenant's frontage. , Monument Signage • Landlord will provide a Monument sign for the development along N Oracle Rd and will control the Tenant signage thereon. All Tenant graphics on the Monument Sign must be approved by the landlord and permits approved by the Town of Oro Valley prior to installation. • Design— See attached • Double sided • 5 tenant panels proposed, up to 8 allowed • Light beige panels with text colors from wall sign colors above • Blank panels shall be opaque • Tenant panels shall be opaque with copy that may be lit. Backgrounds may not be white. • Slump block base • 72 sq ft in sign area • 8' height with 2' architectural feature • Internal illumination Window Signage • Per Oro Valley Zoning Sign Code Directional Signage • Freestanding Directional Signage, may be single or double-sided and may display only written or graphic directions for traffic, name of the business and/or logo, and address and/or suite number. Maximum size is 6 sq ft, maximum height is 3'. If illuminated it must be turned off at close of business. Limit one per freestanding building. • Design to match monument sign Temporary Signage • Any temporary signage (eg: banners) shall be per Per Oro Valley Zoning Sign Code. Color Palette: Red Ydlow Green 3630-015,3632-015 3630 26,3632-26, PANTONE 109 C PANTONE 349 C r}t, White MuddediC Blue Black 3632-36+ 363u-22`,3632-22' PANTONE Black C PANTONE291 C PANTONE Process Black C Gold Trim Cap Sign Type Examples: j Logo j Letters Frock, „n„ sivacit smoothies E YoGurt Text Box 11 Monum ntSign 1.44 in -5 4 ORACLE fink gy 's= 4'x4' 4'x4' 4'x4' (45"x 45"Yisibie) ( "x 45"Visible) (45"x 45" 5ible) .a, N 2'x6' 2'x6' `t C (21"x 69"Visible) (21"x 69'YisIble) • • 6' x 12' Internally Illuminated, Double Sided Monument Sign with 26" x 6' Illuminated Architectural Element at top with Address & Name. 5 individual tenant panels. (Changeable configuration) Blank Panels to be Opaque Beige background color. Tenant panels shall be opaque with copy that may be lit. (White Backgrounds are not allowed.) Attachment 1 Conditions of Approval Sign Criteria for Hacienda Bella 1. Only one color from the approved color palette can be used for sign letters and characters on any one line of sign copy. 2. Wall signs on the south and east building elevations are prohibited. 3. Wall signs on the Dome feature shall not be allowed. NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW BOARD The Conceptual Design Review Board will hold a public meeting on Tuesday, November 13, 2012, 6 p.m. Oro Valley Town Hall, 11000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley, Arizona Request for approval of a Sign Criteria for Hacienda Bella located on the east side of Oracle Road, a third of a mile south of Hardy Road at 8444 North Oracle Road, OV311-008 The meeting will be held in the Council Chambers. The public is encouraged to attend and will be invited to speak. An agenda for this meeting will be made available at least 24 hours prior to the meeting time and can be viewed at www.orovalleyaz.gov. For questions and additional information, please contact Patty Hayes, Zoning Plans Examiner, at (520) 229-4819 or phayes��orovalleyaz.gov. Posted: 10/29/2012 Time: 8:00 AM By: rmf S:\permplus\docs\OV311-008\Z_CDRB Notice 11-13-12.doc I I I WRI V V wnf.+s.#a.... vmti,rI Wv4.. . i..r mi. i U / - I 1 �l 1 /L ' --- Air 1111111/ liq - 1%4 `"__ '` ... l ' ' IP-1-- In* ' IMFSi4 ,,,,,,,, .,i Ali ', __._ ...„., . ,/, - i 2_,------z, / _. / , „. \\ 1 f ( . , __, f„,7=7::.,;‘„ ----- Ai . , lof „ . ___ _ / 7:-.7 7- _71' .,...., i44i 1441 cif ____. _._,,\\.,,,„\„\-,c-\„\---rk------ \, ' 7 ___:....._ M.FI i._p__i_.ic.O1.r,,r,,.: 1 J < __._, --,-, , -1_ \,_\/,IL \ - l _` 1 J i - - iti 0 IIII 'T - ' ; --- ' Lov q-Itoitkt s . A..._/ tat 1 .eit :---,,,,, a p mum :t Rol itA_‘ - wage" \ m* 41 u. qv ,� SIN_ go c \I _\ t. i ipliz-\\ Air........_ 1 ,--.- a t;IF til ' 11.,--4*ill r am. :11-1.1 i r III IrrA 1111 epi Ill • w r ....111:010, iggiows ..... NM \ ,, 11 lirif,' ---':-"\ ilk 1111111111 y A. A i \ __ 1 ,a qp ,, r- , EM A GEER f-----,- -- ), _ II P L . ' i -, il _______ _ ....,___ - 1 1 _______ „ ,\,\, . : 1 _, N.N. Ili \ , / i\ ,, , ,_., •..., .___. ...A --:- : , i i i ) \ \A.., --' _ ,. __>----.. ,, ,10101 NI t . __,... .., , ..., _____ . -- (11--_-] _. ,),. / I t ,,, \_t.--__ -... .0 , -,, N Wr E • V311 -008 HOA Notice Area for 11 -13-2012 CDRB MTG S E dougjbaker@msn.com Page 1 of 1 • Hayes, Patty From: Hayes, Patty Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 9:50 AM To: 'DOUGLAS BAKER' Subject: RE: Sign Criteria-from Sign-A-Rama! Attachments: Hacienda Bella aka Dome Building Nov 2012.doc Doug, I added the conditions to the sign criteria and stamped it approved this morning. See attached. You don't need to do anything else. Timers: Well timers are preferred. That's usually the only way a sign is going to turn off at 11:00pm because most businesses are not open. If you have a client that thinks they can remember to turn it off when they leave then they should give you something in writing so you can give it to us. We actually enforce the off time for signs. Businesses do get violation letters and eventually fines if they don't take care of it. Patty Hayes Zoning Plans Examiner Development& Infrastructure Services Department Town of Oro Valley 520-229-4819 (office) 520-742-1022 (fax) From: DOUGLAS BAKER [mailto:dougjbaker@msn.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 8:40 AM To: Hayes, Patty Subject: Sign Criteria -from Sign-A-Rama! Hi Patty! Thanks again for all you help! I really appreciate it! So I'm assuming that I am now to make the changes that were outlined and re-submit for approval? Also, quick question... are timers mandatory? or not required as long as the lights are on/off as defined under code? Let me know! Thanks! -Doug Douglas J. Baker SIGN-A-RAMA 5819 N Oracle Rd Tucson, AZ 85704 P 520-887-9703 F 520-887-9706 E doucgjbaker@msn.com 11/14/2012