The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutOV31209 Print Council Communication Page 1 of 3 • o4p.j v A°pro O �9 4: IN ,44 ., Town Council Regular Session Item # 1 . Meeting Date: 06/06/2012 Requested by: David Williams Submitted By: Matt Michels, Development Infrastructure Services Department: Development Infrastructure Services Information SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A PAD EXEMPTION AND MASTER SIGN PROGRAM FOR ROONEY RANCH AREA D, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ORACLE ROAD BETWEEN FIRST AVENUE AND PUSCH VIEW LANE RECOMMENDATION: The CDRB recommends approval of the PAD Exemption and Master Sign Program subject to the conditions in Attachment 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Applicant's Request Rooney Ranch Planned Area Development (PAD) Area D is currently regulated by a set of sign guidelines (see Attachment 3) that provide specific standards for sign size, color, character height, illumination, logo size, and sign construction. The applicant wishes to propose a more updated set of criteria to reflect current Town Sign Code and current industry practice, including updated standards for monument signs and a revised color palette. This change requires a PAD Sign Exemption and Master Sign Program (MSP), which are both described below. PAD Sign Exemption A PAD Exemption allows a project that is subject to PAD sign standards to operate under a portion or all of the Town sign standards. In this case, the PAD Exemption would exempt all businesses within Rooney Ranch Area D from the aforementioned sign guidelines and would allow the applicant to propose a MSP to regulate signs in Area D. Please note that the Zoning Code does not contain specific criteria to evaluate PAD Sign Exemptions. Master Sign Program (MSP) (see Attachment 2) A MSP is an alternative to the Town's sign regulations that provides latitude in order to achieve "variety and good design." A MSP functions much like a PAD for signs by providing sign standards that are "custom tailored" to the unique needs of the development, while still maintaining the intent of the Town's Sign Code. According to the applicant, the objective of the MSP is to utilize more modern standards, such as the movement away from copper patina treatments, and to integrate current Zoning Code sign http://lexicon.orovalleyaz.gov/print_ag_memo.cfm?seq=909&rev=0&mode=External&re... 12/20/2012 Print Council Communication Page 2 of 3 w ` standards, such as monument sign area and height. A more detailed discussion of the specific elements of the applicant's MSP proposal are contained in the MSP Zoning Code Conformance section, below. BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: Background Site Conditions • Rooney Ranch Area D is a 41 acre commercial center, anchored by Target and Fry's, with thirteen lots • The center is comprised of major shops, in-line tenants, and freestanding building pads • Three existing monument signs Proposed Standards • Standards for wall, monument, traffic & pedestrian directional, and directional signs • Revised color palette for wall sign text, including copper patina • Updated "topper" design to refurbish existing, double-faced monument signs, design for new monument signs,and design for traffic & pedestrian and directional signs • Proposed brushed aluminum material for freestanding sign panels • Sign construction is pan channel or reverse channel for letters, and cabinets for logos • Illumination is interior, backlit, or combination of both • Prohibition of temporary signs, including banners The proposed MSP proposes a number of standards that are greater than the existing Area D Sign Guidelines, including a revised color palette derived from the Oro Valley Marketplace and increased character height for anchor tenants (from 4'-8" to 6') and a number of standards that are consistent with Zoning Code standards, including the number of signs and the types of illumination allowed. A table comparing the proposed MSP standard with Zoning Code standards is attached for your reference (Attachment 5). MSP Zoning Code Conformance Evaluation of the MSP is guided by the following: • Sign Criteria/Master Sign Program standards in Section 28.2.B.4 of the Zoning Code • Sign Code Purpose Statements • Conceptual Site Design Principles • Addendum A Design Standards A detailed discussion of conformance with these standards in contained in the April 10 CDRB report (see Attachment 6). CDRB Action On April 10, 2012, the CDRB voted to recommend approval of the PAD Exemption and MSP, finding that the MSP meets applicable Conceptual Site Design Principles and the MSP Criteria contained in Chapter 28 of the Zoning Code. The recommendation for approval is subject to the conditions of Attachment 1. http://lexicon.orovalleyaz.gov/print_ag_memo.cfm?seq=909&rev=0&mode=External&re... 12/20/2012 Print Council Communication Page 3 of 3 • Summary The MSP provides an opportunity for Rooney Ranch Area D businesses to utilize current Zoning Code standards while maintaining a number of the existing PAD standards. If approved, existing businesses may continue to use their approved signs. Any new signs would be subject to the new MSP standards. As discussed, the CDRB recommends conditional approval of the PAD Sign Exemption and the MSP, subject to the conditions in Attachment 1. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A SUGGESTED MOTION: PAD Exemption I MOVE to (approve or deny) the PAD Exemption for the Rooney Ranch Area D Sign Guidelines, subject to the Conditions in Attachment 1. Master Skin Program I MOVE to approve the Master Sign Program for Rooney Ranch Area D, subject to the Conditions in Attachment 1, finding that: • The Master Sign Program meets the applicable Conceptual Site Design Principles. • The Master Sign Program meets the Chapter 28 Master Sign Program criteria. or I MOVE to deny the Master Sign Program for Rooney Ranch Area D, finding that: • The proposal does not meet the Conceptual Site Design Principles or Master Sign Program criteria, specifically Attachments Attachment 1 - Conditions of Approval-CDRB Recommended Attachment 2 - Applicant's Submittal Attachment 3 - Existing Rooney D Sign Guidelines Attachment 4 - Rooney Ranch D Map Attachment 5 - Comparison Table Attachment 6 - 4/10/12 CDRB Report Attachment 7 - 4/10/12 DRAFT CDRB Minutes http://lexicon.oroval leyaz.gov/print_ag_memo.cfm?seq=909&rev=0&mode=External&re... 12/20/2012 QO PAL EY Aglc>02 O /A °UNDEDA9�a DEV REVIEW - SIGN SUBMIT MASTER SIGN PROGRAM Resubmittal? N Development Review Transmittal Town of Oro Valley Development Infrastructure Services 11000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley,AZ 85737 Review Agency: OV ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Transmittal Out: Transmittal Due: Project Information APPLIED Project Number: OV312-009 Parcel Number: Project Title: SAN DORADO MASTER SIGN PROGRAM Lots (if applies): Location: SAN DORADO Applicant: PEARSON'S SIGNS Phone: 520-792-2563 Zoning: E-Mail Address: RAY@PEARSONSIGNS.NET Oro Valley Planner: PLANNER TO BE ASSIGNED Date Information (as applies) DRB SubCommittee: DRB Hearing: TC Hearing: Additional Comments: Written comments need to be returned to a Permit Technician. If you have no comments,please sign and date this form, and return it via FAX(520) 742-1022. For questions or comments, call (520) 229-4800 or email cbaker@orovalleyaz.gov Friday,October 12,2012 n _ OV ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MO /� ova- iApproved Without Comments By: Date: nil° P\LEY 46, pQp �91111ki 217 tUrf OuPle I 4 °L/NDED�g1 DEV REVIEW - SIGN SUBMIT MASTER SIGN PROGRAM Resubmittal? N Development Review Transmittal Summary Town of Oro Valley Planning and Zoning Division 11000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley,AZ 85 73 7 Project Information APPLIED Project Number: OV312-009 Project Title: SAN DORADO MASTER SIGN PROGRAM Lots (if applies): Transmittal Out: Transmittal Due: Additional Comments Review Agencies OV CIVIL ENGINEER OV PLANNING- OV ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Friday, October 12,2012 :��y�,, sr hvAwi:�%�yy'L DEVELOPMENT&INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION 11000 N.LA CANADA DRIVE ORO VALLEY,AZ 85737 PHONE:(520)229-4800 FAX: (520)742-1022 www.orovallcyaz.gov or www.orovolleyDlS.com Application for Master Sign Program DATE: / a • • 12- CAS%% - X OV CASE NO#: office use only) APPLICANT: pEA(LSO N I N S ADDRESS: S I l0 i4'71 CITY: J \.)C.SQ tJ STATE: A2. ZIP: TELPHONE: 52° •7 12 '25 b S FAX: 19)•"9 2 7 ( EMAIL: - ') € PeAl2.s01061ij1t, e PROJECT NAME:. :v SUBDIVISION: ADDRESSILOCATION: /6 166 i e, ZONING: l'?9i PARCELITAX CODE#: 2 210 Gar 0 PROPERTY OWNER: 64.4444, ail to ADDRESS: / I'h/1,44,1 . CITY: edv:)c STATE: ZIP: TELEPHONE: 0Z•431 -fl&I FAX: EMAIL: 64AA4144 ., '21C.' .4..//. SIGNATURE: DATE: ! 2_ Signs for businesses located within a Commercial and/or Industrial District, Complex or buildings designed for multiple occupancy shall be coordinated so that a consistent design theme is established and maintained A Master Sign Program is an alternative to the general sign regulations intended to provide latitude in order to achieve variety and good design.Application for a Master Sign Program shall require the approval of the Conceptual Design Review Board and the Town Council prior to the issuance of any sign permits.A checklist of requirements for submittal is attached along with the required fees. .)\\\% •$M1. t =CM 444 :tip a 4,1 411 ,a October 2, 2012 ECEnW �'.. Town of Oro ValleyO C r 1 1 i 0 aZ 11000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley, AZ 85737 74-1 Town of Oro Valley Re: Oro Valley Town Center Signage related permitting documents k Letter of Authorization To Whom It May Concern: Kitchell Development Company, doing business as/and on behalf of Canada Del Oro Partners the developer of Oro Valley Town Center, located at 1st and Oracle in Oro Valley, Arizona, authorizes Ray Giannini with Pearson's Signs to submit signage related documents for permitting purposes for the aforementioned property. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at 602-631-6101. Sincerely, -44 { Brad Anderson Director of Design/Construction Kitchell Development Company P P Y P Kitchell Development Company 1707 East Highland I Suite 100 I Phoenix,Arizona 85016 I Phone 602.264.4411 I Fax 602.264.6133 I www.kitchell.com F54 4>i p «I III SIGNS Since 1927 PHONE:(520)792-2563 3162 E. 47th St. FAX: (520)792-9871 Tucson,AZ 85713-5217 ray@pearsonsigns.net October 11, 2012 Town of Oro Valley Development&Infrastructure Services 11000 N. La Canada Dr. Oro Valley,AZ. 85737 Re: Questions answered for the proposed Master Sign Program San Dorado. To Whom it May Concern: The proposed Master Sign Program is unique in its design because it brings together the desert surroundings with the building and the sign design.There is numerous signs proposed to direct customers and home owners to all areas of this 27 acre site. All signage is in context of the Oro Valley Zoning Code; the quantity of signs are more than usual but this is because of the complexity of the mixed use for this project. This difference is needed because this development is not only retail and office space, but also pedestrian oriented. A-The main entry monumentation at 1st and Oro Valley Road represents the approved direction of gabion walls and rusticated steel towers.While the signage element identifies tenants of the retail for now, it will also represent the overall development,the public space area around the future office building,the multi-family component,as well as the link to the development immediately across the wash.The design and material use presents a more contemporary application of traditional and desert sustainable materials,rather than traditional southwestern style which was the design direction chosen by various review boards for the developments approval. D-Each of the freestanding signs proposed along Oro Valley Road and 1st utilize gabion bases, rusticated and brushed steel panels in various methods tying all the components back to the main monumentation. Identification areas and panels while allowing colors, logos and typestyles of individual tenants are all opaque background with push through acrylic copy areas,emulating the dimensioality of projects dimensional letters on steel background.All illumination of identity is also internal,with uplighting only special gabion wall areas with ground mounted accent lighting to accentuate walls and the lush,desert landscaping, Nfb +s SIGNS Sixee 1927 E.As a PUD,one of the zoning/development approval requirements is to provide a Master Sign Program-in particular because of the multi-use of the site,accessible through a main, and grand area.This access point,with its low-profile but grand monumentation serves more than the retail user and tenants.The development criteria for the retail center is also very different than the typical developments along Oro Valley Road as well. Half of the retail buildings are much closer to the road than usual,with a second set of shops with no street frontage for tenant identification. Multiple access points into the retail and future office area along 1st and Oro Valley were allowed to alleviate traffic back up into the residential,retail,office and development across the wash,unlike any other developments,creates the need to direct traffic to the most accessible point to the tenants.This need for good traffic directional information/wayfinding constitutes the need for latitude in the sign code for the quantity and location along Oro Valley Road. Ray' a d A. Gianni i Proje71111 anager Pearson's Signs Print Council Communication Page 1 of 5 ti��`y A1r O�� k9 ''4:Zatagi:0,4 Ou1NNnrn�g14 Town Council Regular Session Item # 7. Meeting Date: 11/07/2012 Requested by: David Williams Submitted By: Matt Michels, Development Infrastructure Services Department: Development Infrastructure Services Information SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN AND CONCEPTUAL ARCHITECTURE FOR THE SAN DORADO AT ORO VALLEY TOWN CENTRE COMMERCIAL AND MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ORACLE ROAD AND FIRST AVENUE RECOMMENDATION: The Conceptual Design Review Board (CDRB) recommends approval of the Conceptual Site Plan and Conceptual Architecture for the San Dorado project subject to the conditions shown in Attachment 1. Staff recommends one additional condition as shown in Attachment 2 (Planning Condition 7). Additional discussion of the staff-recommended condition is contained in the Background or Detailed Information section of this report. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant requests approval of a Conceptual Site Plan and Conceptual Architecture (Attachments 3 and 5). This project entails development of a 274 unit apartment complex consisting of nineteen apartment buildings with a clubhouse/office, eight carriage unit buildings, and associated amenities on 15.73 acres and a 12.09 acre commercial area with a total of nine in-line buildings and freestanding pads. The four commercial buildings with proposed drive-thrus (Pad "A", Shops "B", Pad "E" and Pad "I") will require a separate Conditional Use Permit (CUP). Any substantial redesign of the pads as a result of CUP conditions may entail future revision of the site plan. Access to the site is provided from a main entry drive at Oracle Road and First Ave. and three secondary drives along Oracle Road. BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: http://lexicon.orovalleyaz.gov/print_ag_memo.cfm?seq=1 029&rev=0&mode=External&r... 12/20/2012 Print Council Communication Page 2 of 5 ' SITE CONDITIONS • Site is 27.82 acres (apartment site is 15.73 acres; commercial area is 12.09 acres). Overall PAD is 141 acres • Zoning is Oro Valley Town Centre at Rooney Ranch Planned Area Development (PAD) • Proposed uses include apartment complex with associated facilities, office and retail uses, restaurants, convenience uses, and civic space • Property is currently vacant • Oro Valley Town Centre at Rooney Ranch PAD is exempt from most provisions of the Oracle Road Scenic Corridor Overlay District (ORSCOD) • Project will be phased (see Attachment 3, Sheet 5) PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS • Nineteen apartment buildings; 1-3 bedroom units; 274 units total • Eight carriage unit buildings • Nine commercial shops and pads (66,880 s.f. total) • 30,250 s.f. of office space • 20,500 s.f. restaurant space • 31,380 s.f. general retail • 4,500 s.f. bank • 30,000 s.f. "Civic Space" to be located behind Pads G & H • Permitted building height: • Up to 40' within 100' of Oracle Road (residential and commercial) • Commercial —40' (+ 5' for architectural features, except for buildings directly along Oracle Rd. frontage) • Office &Apartments — 50'/3 stories, inclusive of architectural features • Proposed building height: • Commercial: 24' — 36' • Apartments: 25' — 38' • The project is in conformance with the PAD setback requirements • Parking: • Commercial Area: 388 spaces proposed based on an Alternative Parking Ratio • Apartments: 535 spaces proposed based on an Alternative Parking Ratio • Minimum15% landscaped open space required by PAD; 30% provided • Landscape concept includes: • All plants from Oro Valley Town Centre at Rooney Ranch PAD approved plant list • Required buffer yard plantings on front of property • Landscaping in rainwater harvesting basins APPROVALS TO DATE • PAD approved by Town Council on October 16, 2002 (Ordinance 02-33) http://lexicon.orovalleyaz.gov/print_ag_memo.cfm?seq=1029&rev=0&mode=External&r... 12/20/2012 Print Council Communication Page 3 of 5 • PAD amended on April 18, 2012 (Ordinance No. (0) 12-06), which includes a provision for up to 275 multi-family residential units Conceptual Site Plan: The intent of the Conceptual Site Plan is to ensure that the project's overall site layout is functional and is compatible with the surrounding area. The project includes pedestrian connectivity to and within the site, to the future Rooney Wash trail, and internally between the residential and commercial areas. The proposed development is adequately separated and screened from homes to the east and will be generally compatible with the existing area. The CDRB found the Conceptual Site Plan to be in substantial conformance with the Zoning Code, Oro Valley Town Centre at Rooney Ranch PAD, Design Principles and applicable Design Standards, and has recommended approval, subject to the conditions in Part I of Attachment 1. The October 9, 2012, CDRB staff report is attached for your reference (see Attachment 4). Staff-Recommended Additional Condition of Approval (Attachment 2) The intersection of Oracle Road and First Ave (where this project is located) is at or near the center of the Town's commercial areas. Because opportunities may exist to locate Town-owned public art or other appropriate public improvements near the main project entry in the future, staff recommends a condition (see Attachment 2, Condition 7 under Planning section) for the Town and applicant to work cooperatively to identify potential locations for the placement of future public artwork or other appropriate public improvements. The condition states that any proposed artwork or public improvements must be of a mutually-agreeable design, theme, and location. If an agreement is reached, an easement would be granted to the Town for the placement of artwork or other improvements on the applicant's property. Conceptual Architecture: The proposed architecture features traditional and contemporary Southwestern elements, shapes and materials, including sloped and flat roof planes, architecturally appropriate windows with pop-outs and lintels, and the use of traditional roof tile and stucco finish. Slump block accents are used on columns on the commercial buildings. Pedestrian walkways in front of the commercial area will be shaded with colonnades, trellises, and awnings. The residential and commercial architectural designs are appropriate for the area and are complimentary to each other. The CDRB found that the Conceptual Architecture to be in substantial conformance with the Zoning Code, Oro Valley Town Centre at Rooney Ranch PAD, Design Principles and applicable Design Standards, and has recommended approval, subject to the conditions in Part II of Attachment 1. The October 9, 2012, CDRB staff report is included as Attachment 6. The project will provide a two phase public art project for the commercial portions of the property with the theme of native wildlife indigenous to the Catalina Mountains. The first phase will be located in front of Shops C and D, near the breezeway between the two buildings, and will be composed of two life size bronze sculptures of a Chuckwalla and a Spotted Whiptail Lizard. The second phase will be located in the civic area between Pads G and H, and will feature a javalina or a pair of white-winged doves. The Conceptual http://lexicon.orovalleyaz.gov/print_ag_memo.cfm?seq=1029&rev=0&mode=External&r... 12/20/2012 Print Council Communication Page 4 of 5 public art will be reviewed by the CDRB on November 13. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENT: Notice to the public was provided consistent with Town-adopted noticing procedures, which includes the following: • Notification of residents within 600 feet • Posting at Town Hall • All registered HOAs No letters have been received in support or opposition to the proposal. Two residents have made inquiries regarding the site plan. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A SUGGESTED MOTION: CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN: Approval as recommended by CDRB I MOVE to approve the Conceptual Site Plan for the San Dorado at Oro Valley Town Centre Commercial and Multi-Family Residential Development, located on the east side of Oracle Road and First Avenue, subject to the conditions in Attachment 1, Part I, finding that the Conceptual Site Plan meets applicable Design Principles and Standards. Approval as recommended by staff I MOVE to approve the Conceptual Site Plan for the San Dorado at Oro Valley Town Centre Commercial and Multi-Family Residential Development, located on the east side of Oracle Road and First Avenue, subject to the conditions in Attachment 2, Part I, finding that the Conceptual Site Plan meets applicable Design Principles and Standards. OR I MOVE to deny the Conceptual Site Plan for the San Dorado at Oro Valley Town Centre Commercial and Multi-Family Residential Development, located on the east side of Oracle Road and First Avenue, finding that the Conceptual Site Plan does not meet applicable Design Principles and Standards. CONCEPTUAL ARCHITECTURE: I MOVE to approve the Conceptual Architecture for the San Dorado at Oro Valley Town Centre Commercial and Multi-Family Residential Development, located on the east side of Oracle Road and First Avenue, subject to the conditions in Attachment 1, Part II, finding that the Conceptual Architecture meets applicable Design Principles and Standards. OR I MOVE to deny the Conceptual Architecture for the San Dorado at Oro Valley Town Centre Commercial and Multi-Family Residential Development, located on the east side of http://lexicon.orovalleyaz.gov/print_ag_memo.cfm?seq=1029&rev=0&mode=External&r... 12/20/2012 Print Council Communication Page 5 of 5 ' Oracle Road and First Avenue, finding that the Conceptual Architecture does not meet applicable Design Principles and Standards. Attachments Attachment 1 - CDRB-Recommended Conditions of Approval Attachment 2 - Staff-Recommended Conditions of Approval Attachment 3 - Conceptual Site Plan Attachment 4 - 10/9/12 CDRB Staff Report-Conceptual Site Plan Attachment 5 - Conceptual Architecture Attachment 6 - 10/9/12 CDRB Staff Report-Conceptual Architecture http://lexicon.orovalleyaz.gov/print_ag_memo.cfm?seq=1029&rev=0&mode=External&r... 12/20/2012 Page I of 2 Hayes, Patty To: Ray Giannini Subject: RE: Revised package Ray, Thank you for the revised MSP. I have started to look at it and have a couple of questions. • The number of B1 signs on the matrix reads 3 but the site plan shows 6 locations. How many do you really propose? Are some location alternatives? • The number of wall signs on the matrix reads max 4 under quantity but the location reads 3. How many do you really propose? • Page 11 under Illumination refers to exposed neon but its not listed in the matrix. Do you want exposed neon? • A color palette wasn't added in this revised MSP. There really needs to be a color palette that shows you are trying to provide a cohesive consistent sign program. Trademarked signs as mentioned in the MSP would still be allowed. I don't want to add those details to my report if they are incorrect. Please respond ASAP this morning if you can. You can answer via email today so that I can complete my report and then you can make the changes in your revised MSP that you will mail or deliver to us next week. We will need 17 copies of the proposed MSP. Please send those copies to the CDRB Clerk Roseanne Flores. She will make sure those get distributed appropriately. Thank you very much. Patty Hayes Zoning Plans Examiner Development& Infrastructure Services Department Town of Oro Valley 520-229-4819 (office) 520-742-1022 (fax) From: Ray Giannini [mailto:ray@pearsonsigns.net] Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 3:00 PM To: Hayes, Patty Subject: Fw: Revised package Patty Here's our revised MSP, let me know what you think. Thanks for all your help and have a nice Holiday. Raymond A. Giannini Pearson's Signs 3162 E. 47th St. Tucson, AZ. 85713 520-792-2563 520-940-2466 Cell Original Message From: Jamie Cowgill To: Ray Giannini ; Brad Anderson Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 11:51 AM Subject: Revised package 11/21/2012 Page 2 of 2 Jamie Cowgill x 4634 N 44th Street Phoenix Arizona 85018 602.224.5100 (p) 602.224.5102 (f) www.jrcdesign.com Jamie Cowgill 4634 N 44th Street Phoenix Arizona 85018 602.224.5100 (p) 602.224.5102 (f) www jrcdesign.com 11/21/2012 Page 1 of 4 Hayes, Patty • From: Jamie Cowgill [jcowgill©jrcdesign.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 21,2012 11:40 AM To: Ray Giannini; Hayes, Patty Subject: Re: Revised package B1 signs - I have changed all the numbers on the plan and matrix to actually be five(5). Wall signs are to be 3 per tenant. I changed the 4 to a three in locations. No exposed neon- I took that out once,but must of have missed it. Color palette is noted as being based on a standard set of colors provided in a palette of acrylics/plexiglas, but they all must have the dark bronze returns and trip caps. can we provide an acrylic/plexiglass brochure for all the colors as an attachment? I will make these revisions and prepare another pdf to send asap. Thanks. Jamie Cowgill Raftfri 1,c Of%IGN 4634 N 44th Street Phoenix Arizona 85018 602.224.5100 (p) 602.224.5102 (f) www.jrcdesign.com On Nov 21, 2012, at 10:28 AM, Ray Giannini wrote: Jamie, Here's the issues to be addressed today. Raymond A. Giannini Pearson's Signs 3162 E. 47th St. Tucson, AZ. 85713 520-792-2563 520-940-2466 Cell Original Message----- From: Hayes, Patty 11/21/2012 Page 2 of 4 v To: Ray Giannini . Cc: bandersonakitchell.com Sent:Wednesday, November 21, 2012 10:16 AM Subject: RE: Revised package Ray, Thank you for the revised MSP. I have started to look at it and have a couple of questions. • The number of B1 signs on the matrix reads 3 but the site plan shows 6 locations. How many do you really propose? Are some location alternatives? • The number of wall signs on the matrix reads max 4 under quantity but the location reads 3. How many do you really propose? • Page 11 under Illumination refers to exposed neon but its not listed in the matrix. Do you want exposed neon? • A color palette wasn't added in this revised MSP. There really needs to be a color palette that shows you are trying to provide a cohesive consistent sign program. Trademarked signs as mentioned in the MSP would still be allowed. I don't want to add those details to my report if they are incorrect. Please respond ASAP this morning if you can. You can answer via email today so that I can complete my report and then you can make the changes in your revised MSP that you will mail or deliver to us next week. We will need 17 copies of the proposed MSP. Please send those copies to the CDRB Clerk Roseanne Flores. She will make sure those get distributed appropriately. Thank you very much. Patty Hayes Zoning Plans Examiner Development& Infrastructure Services Department Town of Oro Valley 520-229-4819 (office) 520-742-1022 (fax) From: Ray Giannini [mailto:ray@pearsonsigns.net] Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 3:00 PM To: Hayes, Patty Subject: Fw: Revised package Patty Here's our revised MSP, let me know what you think. Thanks for all your help and have a nice Holiday. Raymond A. Giannini Pearson's Signs 3162 E. 47th St. Tucson, AZ. 85713 520-792-2563 520-940-2466 Cell Original Message From: Jamie Cowgill To: Ray Giannini ; Brad Anderson 11/21/2012 Page 3 of 4 Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 11:51 AM • Subject: Revised package Jamie Cowgill 4634 N 44th Street Phoenix Arizona 85018 602.224.5100 (p) 602.224.5102 (f) www.jrcdesign.com Jamie Cowgill 4634 N 44th Street Phoenix Arizona 85018 cnn r)r)A al Ail I-\ Print Council Communication Page 1 of 7 Town Council Regular Session Item # 3. Meeting Date: 12/05/2012 Requested by: David Williams Submitted By: Chad Daines, Development Infrastructure Services Department: Development Infrastructure Services Information SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: RESOLUTION NO. (R)12-66, AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL / OFFICE, RESORT / GOLF COURSE TO LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (1.3-2 DU/AC), MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (2.1 — 5 DU/AC), OPEN SPACE AND NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL /OFFICE (NC/0) AND AMEND THE SIGNIFICANT RESOURCE AREA AND SPECIAL AREA POLICIES AND TO AMEND THE URBAN SERVICES BOUNDARY FOR THE 110 ACRE PROPERTY KNOWN AS DESERT SPRINGS, LOCATED EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF TANGERINE AND ORACLE ROADS RECOMMENDATION: The Planning & Zoning Commission recommended approval. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Desert Springs is a 110 acre property located east of the intersection of Tangerine and Oracle Roads in unincorporated Pima County, within the Town of Oro Valley planning area boundary. The General Plan currently designates the property for low density residential, commercial, office, resort and golf course uses. The current General Plan also designates the property Significant Resource Area. The proposed Major General Plan Amendment would amend the land use designation to allow low to medium density residential, neighborhood commercial, professional office and open space uses. The applicant also proposes to amend the Significant Resource Area designation, amend the Special Area Policies and expand the Urban Services Boundary to encompass the entire property. The existing and proposed General Plan designations are shown in Attachment 2. The proposed Special Area Policies and Figure addressing bufferyards are provided in Attachment 3. The application was considered by the Planning & Zoning Commission at two separate public hearings. On November 5th, the Commission voted to recommend approval of the amendment. http://lexicon.orovalleyaz.gov/print_ag_memo.cfm?seq=1053&rev=0&mode=External&r... 12/21/2012 Print Council Communication Page 2 of 7 BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: The Planning & Zoning Commission staff reports from the October 16th and November 5th public hearings are provided in Attachments 4 and 5 respectively. Please refer to the October 16th staff report (Attachment 4) for background on the property, existing General Plan, zoning history and other relevant issues. Land Use Map Amendment The Land Use Map Amendment requested by the applicant is depicted in Attachment 2 and summarized by the following comparative analysis with the existing Pima County zoning and current Oro Valley General Plan designations on the property: Existing Proposed Existing OV Pima General Plan General Plan County Amendment Zoning Neighborhood Rural Village Neighborhood Commercial Center Commercial Office (commercial) Office 31 Acres 18 Acres 24 Acres Resort / Golf Major Resort Medium Course 44 Acres Density (2.1 - 24 Acres 5.0 du/ac) 60 Acres Low Density Suburban Low Density (1.3 - 2.0 Ranch (.3 (1.3 - 2.0 du/ac) du/ac) du/ac) 54 Acres 47 Acres 13 Acres Open Space 13 Acres Total Units Total Units: Total Units: 108* 14 Maximum 250 Guest Units: units 154 per Special Area Policy * = Total units calculated using upper end of density range Summary Observations: • Reduction of low density residential uses in the Oro Valley General Plan; from 54 to 13 acres • Increase in overall number of single family residential units from current Oro Valley General Plan; 108 to 250 units • Moderate decrease in commercial and office uses from the current Oro Valley General Plan; from 31 to 24 acres • Elimination of the planned resort use designated by the current Oro Valley General Plan and Pima County zoning entitlements (including elimination of 154 guest units) on the property http://lexicon.orovalleyaz.gov/print_ag_memo.cfm?seq=1053&rev=0&mode=External&r... 12/21/2012 Print Council Communication Page 3 of 7 • Elimination of the golf course use designated by the Oro Valley General Plan • Preservation of 13 acres of ridgelines and steep hillsides as Open Space The reduction in commercial acreage and elimination of the resort / guest units and golf course is generally off-set by increases in overall density and decreased lot sizes from 3.3 acres to 5,000 sq. ft. As an overall comment; considering the reductions in non-residential intensity (resort and golf course) and increase in residential density, the request represents moderate increase in overall impact on the property. To lessen the impact of increased density, particularly on the immediate Talante Estates subdivision, the applicant has proposed a number of mitigation measures. These include establishment of landscaped buffers, maximum lot count limitation, and limitations on building heights / number of lots immediately adjacent to the existing subdivision. These mitigation measures are addressed in Attachment 3. Significant Resource Area The property contains a variety of sensitive environmental resources including archaeological resources, the historic Joesler House, native vegetation, hillsides and ridgelines, valleys and habitats. Based on preliminary assessments of these environmental resources, the entire property was designated Significant Resource Area (SRA) on the 2005 General Plan. The applicant originally proposed removal of the Significant Resource Area designation from the entire property. Based on review of a preliminary environmental analysis and field work, staff recommended and the applicant agreed to retain the SRA designation on portions of the property containing visible ridgelines and hillsides with 25% and greater slopes, the historic Joesler House and archaeological sites. The additional SRA areas are primarily around the Joesler House, which occupies the highest and most visible portion of the property from the public roadways and from Catalina State Park. The preliminary environmental analysis and other supplemental information can be accessed at the Planning Division website. It should be emphasized that the Significant Resource Area (SRA) designation serves as an alert that substantial environmental resources may be present and is not a "no-build" designation or open space preservation area. The SRA description in the General Plan indicates that these areas should be developed at the lowest density of the current land use designations. Retention of the SRA designation on the most sensitive portions of the property will serve as additional guidance during any subsequent zoning of the property relative to density and the need for sensitive design methods. To this end, the SRA areas in the vicinity of the Joesler House have been designated Low Density (1.3-2.0 du/ac). To clarify the intent to preserve a majority of the visible ridgelines and steeper sloped areas, the applicant also modified the proposed Land Use Plan to designate a majority of the previously designated SRA areas as Open Space. The Environmentally Sensitive Lands (ESL) Ordinance is fully applied during the subsequent rezoning of the property. As this area is outside Town limits, it was not included in the ESL Planning Map and conservation categories were not established specific to the property. Any subsequent rezoning will involve a detailed submittal and review for full compliance with the Town's adopted ESL regulations. http://lexicon.orovalleyaz.gov/print_ag_memo.cfm?seq=1053&rev=0&mode=External&r... 12/21/2012 Print Council Communication Page 4 of 7 Amended Special Area Policies The General Plan contains a Special Area Policy supporting acquisition of the property by the Town and other agencies. The applicant proposes to delete this existing policy. For the reasons outlined in Attachments 4 and 5, staff is not opposed to deletion of this policy. The applicant proposes a number of Special Area Policies to implement the proposed development and to address neighborhood and community concerns. The proposed Special Area Policies are provided in Attachment 3. Urban Services Boundary The General Plan includes the northern portion of the development within the Urban Services Boundary. Extension of water and sewer service across Oracle Road to this un- served site will entail substantial costs. Potentially, such utility service extensions could serve the Talante Estates development and Catalina State Park. As the property is across the street from utilities and transportation facilities appropriate to accommodate urban development, staff supports the inclusion of the entire property within the Urban Services Boundary. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT CRITERIA The Oro Valley Zoning Code states that "the disposition of the General Plan amendment proposed shall be based on consistency with the vision, goals, and policies of the General Plan, with special emphasis on the specific criteria. The applicant for the amendment has the burden of presenting facts and other materials to address these criteria. Attachment 6 contains the applicant's response to the criteria and staff commentary. The Planning & Zoning Commission and staff believe the proposed development generally meets the criteria for amendments and many of the applicable policies within the General Plan. PUBLIC NOTICE AND COMMENT Notice has been provided in accordance with Town procedures, which includes the following: • Notice to property owners within 1,000 feet of property (boundary expanded) • 60-Day notification and review opportunity for outside agencies • Homeowners Association mailing • Notice in The Daily Territorial and Arizona Daily Star newspaper six (6) times • Notice to interested parties • Post at Town Hall and on website • Posting on the property 60 Day Review Comments As required by State Law, the application was routed to outside agencies for review and comment. Comments from Pima County, Arizona State Parks, Pima Association of Governments, Arizona Department of Transportation and Tucson Electric Power were received. The outside agency review comments are provided on Attachment 7 and summarized as follows: • Concern over densities and intensities greater than what is currently entitled by Pima County. • Impact of the development on the environmental resources of the site. • Protection of the historic Joesler House and archaeological sites on the property. http://lexicon.orovalleyaz.gov/print_ag_memo.cfm?seq=1053&rev=0&mode=External&r... 12/21/2012 Print Council Communication Page 5 of 7 • Maximize open space areas on the north and northeastern portion of the site to preserve known wildlife corridors. • Negative impact of the development on recreational experience at Catalina State Park. • Prohibit access to Catalina State Park. • Lighting impacts on Catalina State Park • ADOT, TEP and PAG comments are informational in nature. Neighborhood Meeting Issues Neighborhood meetings were held on April 12th, September 20th and October 24th. The summary notes from the neighborhood meetings are provided as Attachment 8. A summary of issues discussed at the neighborhood meetings is as follows: • Deletion of the Significant Resources Area designation and implications to environmental resources, including wildlife movement corridors. • Density too high adjacent to existing homes and the Catalina State Park. • Impact of development to property values. • Buffering adjacent to existing homes. • Pima County should purchase the property for open space purposes. • Visual impact on the Catalina State Park and the need to buffer land uses. • Concern over cuts and fills into the hillside portions of the development. • Concern that there is not a current market for new home construction. Applicant Responses to Issues The applicant modified the proposed Land Use Map to retain the SRA designation on the most sensitive areas of the site including historic and archaeological resources, hillsides 25% or greater and ridgelines. Additionally, the applicant designated a majority of these sensitive areas as Open Space, which will ensure preservation of these areas. Regarding the overall project density, the applicant modified the request to delete the originally proposed high density area for apartments and the amount of Medium Density Residential has been reduced in the revised submittal. The applicant has developed and refined mitigation measures to lessen the impact on adjoining residential areas. Public acquisition of this property is a goal for Sonoran Coalition for Desert Protection. Currently, there is no bond money available or earmarked for acquisition of this property and no public commitment exists to acquire this private property. Several public hearing participants have erroneously stated the property is public open space. Comments from Interested Parties Comments from interested parties have been received and are provided as Attachment 9. Issues raised in these letters include impact to the environment (including habitat, slopes and wildlife movement) and Catalina State Park, increased density resulting in more traffic and burden on schools. Planning and Zoning Commission Public Hearings The Planning and Zoning Commission held two required public hearings on the application on October 16th and November 5th. The draft minutes from these hearings are provided as Attachment 10. In summary, issues raised at the public hearing included impact to the environment, impact to Catalina State Park, protection of the ridgelines and steep slope areas and impact to wildlife corridors adjacent to the property. http://lexicon.orovalleyaz.gov/print_ag_memo.cfm?seq=1053&rev=0&mode=External&r... 12/21/2012 Print Council Communication Page 6 of 7 SUMMARY/CONCLUSION Following is a summary of the factors for and against the proposal: Factors for: 1. The proposed amendment represents a moderate increase in overall project intensity when compared to the current General Plan. 2. The applicant has developed effective mitigation measures in consultation with immediate neighbors including buffer yards, lot size and number restrictions and building height limitations. 3. Changes in the area including the expansion of Oracle Road, growth of regional commercial and employment centers substantiate residential and employment development on the property. 4. Plans for public agency acquisition of the property have changed, substantiating a need to develop an updated plan for development that reflects current conditions. 5. Resource sensitive site planning is proposed and application of the Environmentally Sensitive Lands ordinance will yield conservation of environmental resources. Factors Against: 1. The proposed amendment represents a potential impact on the sensitive resources on the site and there remains a strong need for sensitive site planning to minimize environmental impact. 2. Concern from Pima County, Coalition for Sonoran Desert Protection, Friends of Catalina State Park and the public over the project impact on the environmental resources of the site. 3. Potential visual impact to significant slopes visible from Catalina State Park and Oracle Road. This project is significant and has generated concerns from Pima County, regional environmental groups, immediate neighbors and Arizona State Parks. The applicant and the immediate neighbors have worked diligently to develop mitigation measures to address project impacts on this existing residential area. The property contains significant environmental resources requiring sensitive site planning to conserve resources on the site. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to approve Resolution No. (R)12-66, amending the Oro Valley General Plan for the property known as Desert Springs, based on the findings included in this Council Communication. • The proposed amendment meets the criteria for a Major General Plan amendment and advances many applicable policies in the General Plan. • The proposed amendment represents a moderate increase in overall project intensity when compared to the current General Plan. http://lexicon.orovalleyaz.gov/print_ag_memo.cfm?sed=1053&rev=0&mode=External&r... 12/21/2012 Print Council Communication Page 7 of 7 • The applicant has developed effective mitigation measures in consultation with immediate neighbors including buffer yards, lot size and number restrictions and building height limitations. • Changes in the area including the expansion of Oracle Road, growth of regional commercial and employment centers substantiate residential and employment development on the property. • Plans for public agency acquisition of the property have changed, substantiating a need to develop an updated plan for development that reflects current conditions. • Resource sensitive site planning is proposed and application of the Environmentally Sensitive Lands ordinance will yield conservation of environmental resources. • Visible ridgelines and hillside areas of the site with slopes 25% and greater have been retained as Significant Resource Area. • A majority of the ridgelines and steeper sloped areas have been designated Open Space and preserved as natural area open space. • An appropriate urban level infrastructure exists in proximity to the site. OR I MOVE to deny Resolution No. (R)12-66, finding that the proposed amendment does not meet the criteria for evaluating Major General Plan Amendments. Attachments Attachment 1 - R12-66 Desert Springs GPA Attachment 2 - Existing and Proposed Land Use Map Attachment 3 - Special Area Policies and Figure Attachment 4 - October 16th Planning and Zoning Commission Report Attachment 5 - November 5th Planning and Zoning Commission Report Attachment 6 - General Plan Amendment Criteria Analysis Attachment 7 - Outside Agency Review Comments Attachment 8 - Neighborhood Meeting Summaries Attachment 9 - Interested Parties Comments Attachment 10 - Oct.16 and Nov. 5 Draft planning and Zoning Commission Minutes http://lexicon.orovalleyaz.gov/print_ag_memo.cfm?sect=1053&rev=0&mode=External&r... 12/21/2012 NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW BOARD The Conceptual Design Review Board will hold a public meeting on Tuesday, December 11, 2012, 6 p.m. Oro Valley Town Hall, 11000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley, Arizona Review and recommendation of a Master Sign Program for San Dorado located on the east side of Oracle Road at 1st Avenue, OV312-009. The meeting will be held in the Council Chambers. The public is encouraged to attend and will be invited to speak. An agenda for this meeting will be made available at least 24 hours prior to the meeting time and can be viewed at www.orovalleyaz.gov. For questions and additional information, please contact Patty Hayes, Zoning Plans Examiner, at (520) 229-4819 or phayes@orovalleyaz.gov. Posted: 11/26/2012 Time: 8:15 AM By: rmf S:\permplus\docs\OV312-009\Z_CDRB Notice 12-11-12.doc m w w w w N N v ,,,, 1 ,., 1 \i(.7, P14,, '' O i V‘ '' ‘- jr- \\4 r ' �-+ _00 0. IP ., __Li_l Z 0011°' z";)\'\ 1 .„.„0, ;.„,„\ /, �- I ' ...i u_z,l -POT. lf_ � N t/ : ,_. .// , --:=---__ , R f - \ \\ ir%110-0.'-,-„., ' ,, ,_ 7___,,,,„3 ii . 1 ,_,,, iqii Y 1, IIM+RulIIIIIII �il 11,P:,„,'„,-----_ -j---::::''':- IV ----------. . `\ fig- \\ \\\ -- ,rill : 4 � \ r i , \ ti‘ \ ..,,,,_,:i._,„ , , � \ - " z." _ / ,...:.„,„:, . .......\,:„....„-„, \ , III , I � : _ � ,,,„ /3_, I t , T 'T Y, r �, , r- i L .f I Il. I : -,` . , ___. ; ... _sr_ ,—- —....,..____. , , • , _, . . . 1 — --A ,U _ . , i , , . • • w 44,E OV312-009 Affected HOA's - s 2 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING DATE: December 11, 2012 TO: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW BOARD FROM: Patty Hayes, Zoning Plans Examiner SUBJECT: Review and recommendation of a Master Sign Program for San Dorado located on the east side of Oracle Road at 1 St Avenue, OV312-009. SUMMARY: The applicant has submitted a proposed Master Sign Program (MSP) to establish sign standards for permanent signs in the San Dorado development. This property was previously referred to as the Oro Valley Town Centre and was zoned Planned Area Development (PAD) earlier this year. There are no specific sign standards established by the PAD, and therefore the provisions of the Zoning Code govern allowable signs within the development. As permitted by the Zoning Code, the applicant desires to establish a sign program specific to this development through the attached Master Sign Program. A Master Sign Program is a set of proposed sign standards for a development that proposes alternatives to the Zoning Code, and is intended to provide latitude in order to achieve variety and good design. An MSP requires review and recommendation by the Conceptual Design Review Board (CDRB) and approval by the Town Council. BACKGROUND: Site Conditions The subject property is an undeveloped 27.82 acre site with 12.09 acres of commercial uses and 15.73 acres of apartment use. The property has over '/2 mile of Oracle Road frontage with four vehicular entrances off of Oracle Road. The Conceptual Site Plan and Conceptual Architecture Plan were recently approved by Town Council. I� ''il,}'�,}+, .,. _..,,k:nin:;net:}:i ;i its• •1 7..,,r. c`+,:},li:t:+.�{>;V�{t:�nl� ;L.:o n''�.l ti E�•�, i i�t;t�'ll }Ftt i l tj1't 1. {i `i�iI„�;,�...�{„t P`S'{�I 'i t}I I IV}tts;.i�G 1 J ?'}j f�'`{li tP:�j•�t;i i i�i�iifli li ►. ,�I:.�„�,:,�4 il. .nl,gll,��l,il,�,nl}��;��I:c�,�t{,:��t;c,tf:lE�,��.,r�E�!�t��14�t:��ItE,(i�t ��.L:andUse.��Et��l��►�,�;��{��►��f��-is��,��:ll��t��,�{��}l�;?�};f�.i, West Rooney Ranch PAD Commercial developments including the Home Depot and Target Centers. North La Reserve PAD Desert Pointe aka Fairwinds Retirement Community East La Reserve PAD Multi Family Residential Single Family Residential South La Reserve PAD Vacant land (possibly future hotel) Proposal • Provides for two Entryway signs and multiple Monument signs throughout the development. • Establishes wall sign types and colors along with under canopy signs. Process Section 21.5.B of the Zoning Code provides that a Master Sign Program shall be reviewed by the CDRB for recommendation and approved by the Town Council prior to the issuance of a sign permit. The standards proposed in the Master Sign Program will regulate all allowable signs for this site. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Page 2 of 3 Previous Project Approvals • The Oro Valley Town Centre PAD was approved in April 2012. • The San Dorado Conceptual Site Plan and Architecture Plan were approved by Town Council in November 2012. ZONING CODE COMPLIANCE • Zoning Code Section 28.3.C.1, Various sign colors are permitted, except for fluorescent or iridescent colors. The attached MSP submitted by the applicant proposes the use of five (5) sign colors as shown in the color palette, Attachment 3, but will not use fluorescent or iridescent colors. The MSP will allow the use of national logos and colors. After further consideration, the applicant is in the process of expanding the color palette to include more variety in possible sign colors. It is anticipated that the expanded color palette will be received shortly and a supplemental transmittal will be sent to the CDRB addressing the new colors upon receipt of the applicant's submittal. • Zoning Code 28.2.B.4.a, Review of the Master Sign Program shall be guided by the overall character of the entire development, including landscaping, architecture, topography, uses, and design. Since this MSP is being created during the projects development stage the applicant has taken this opportunity to integrate signs into the site with formal landscape areas and lighting features. The sign structures use similar and/or complementary style, colors, materials and textures of the proposed buildings in the development. • Zoning Code 28.2.B.3.b, Master Sign Programs shall be based on the provisions of Chapter 28 and shall conform to the purpose and intent of this Chapter and to the Addendum A, Design Guidelines The applicant proposes to expand the standards for Multi-Tenant Monument Signs to permit entry sign information. The applicant has also proposed expanding the wall sign standards to allow tenants to provide for a custom type of under canopy sign as shown on page 13 of Attachment 3. • Zoning Code 28.2.B.3.c, Master Sign Programs shall include only those sign types permitted herein and may allow adjustments to the standards of those types, provided they are justifiable. A table comparing the proposed signs with the signs provided in the Zoning Code has been provided as Attachment 2. ANALYSIS OF CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW PRINCIPLES AND DESIGN STANDARDS Conceptual Site Design Principles The following Design Principles are notable for this application: • Zoning Code 22.9.D.5.b.iv, Sign colors, design and placement shall be complementary and integral to the project's architectural and site design themes. • TOWN OF ORO VALLEY CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Page 3 of 3 The proposed MSP establishes color, design and placement requirements which complement the project's architectural and design theme. Specifically, the MSP utilizes identical color and materials drawn from the approved color and material palette established within the Conceptual Architectural Plan. Addendum A Design Standards The following Design Standards are notable for this application: • Section 2.1.F.2, Project identification and sign elements shall incorporate architectural treatment and project unifying elements which are integrated with the overall design of the project in terms of style, materials, color and theme. The style, design, colors and materials utilized for the proposed project signs is consistent with the design theme, colors and materials to be used in the project architecture. The proposed signs will unify the design theme established by the building architecture. • Section 2.1.F. 4. Location and placement of building mounted signs shall be integrated into building architecture. Building signs shall be consistent in terms of materials and construction The buildings are planned with a designated area to allow adequate space for wall signs. These designated areas are positioned above and below architectural features of the buildings as shown in the applicants proposal, Attachment 3. The San Dorado Development is planned with buildings with more than one "frontage". The MSP proposes to allow tenants to provide building signage on multiple sides for identification for vehicular and pedestrian traffic from all angles. • Section 2.1.F.5. As feasible, sign colors shall utilize the project color palette approved as part of the Conceptual Design for the project. Colors selected for the monument signs are taken from the same color palette used for the buildings stucco, tiled roofs and stone elements. CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION: The CDRB should closely consider the design standards, highlighted herein, in evaluating the proposed Master Sign Program. The MSP should be recommended if the board finds compliance with these standards. SUGGESTED MOTION: The CDRB may wish to consider one of the following suggested motions: 1 move to approve OV312-009, a Master Sign Program for San Dorado, based on the finding that the proposed Master Sign Program, as conditioned, is in conformance with the applicable Zoning Code and Design Standards and Principles, subject to the conditions in Attachment 1 (with the following modifications .) OR I move to deny the Master Sign Program for San Dorado, based on the finding that the proposal does not meet the Design Principles and Standards, specifically Attachments: TOWN OF ORO VALLEY CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Page 4 of 3 1. Conditions of Approval 2. Table of Sign Comparisons 3. Proposed Master Sign Program 4. Location Map C r r,. r Chad Daines, Principal Planner S:lpermplusldocs\ov312-0091Z_CDRB Staff Report 12-11-12.doc TOWN OF ORO VALLEY CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING DATE: December 11, 2012 TO: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW BOARD FROM: Patty Hayes, Zoning Plans Examiner SUBJECT: Supplemental attachment for the Review and recommendation of a Master Sign Program for San Dorado, OV312-009. SUMMARY: The applicant submitted a proposed Master Sign Program (MSP) to establish sign standards for permanent signs in the San Dorado development which was included in your packets for the December 11, 2012 CDRB meeting. The MSP submitted by the applicant proposed the use of five (5) sign colors as shown in the color palette originally submitted for review. After further consideration, the applicant expanded the color palette to include a total of 39 colors to allow more variety in possible sign colors. Attached is the revised color palette for review. • Zoning Code Section 28.3.C.1, Various sign colors are permitted, except for fluorescent or iridescent colors. The proposed color palette does not contain fluorescent or iridescent colors and provides a wide range of colors for clear identification of the businesses within the development. In addition to the colors proposed in the attached color palette, the MSP will also allow the use of national logos and colors. SUGGESTED MOTION: The CDRB may wish to consider one of the following suggested motions: I move to approve OV312-009, a Master Sign Program for San Dorado, based on the finding that the proposed Master Sign Program, as conditioned, is in conformance with the applicable Zoning Code and Design Standards and Principles, subject to the conditions in Attachment 1 and supplemental attachment (with the following modifications _) OR I move to deny the Master Sign Program for San Dorado, based on the finding that the proposal does not meet the Design Principles and Standards, specifically Chad Daines, Principal Planner S:\permplus\docs\OV312-009\Z_CDRB Staff Report supplemental 12-11-12.doc R&H rantone / CYRO R&H rantone / CYRO R&H Pantone / CYRO R&H Pantone / CYRO R&H Pantone / CYRO , Yellow C, Black C, 2037 407-2 2115 485 288, 605-0 2308 321 2025 199-0 2114 2283 485, 211 -1 7328 -- , 015-2 2325 106 2329 298 407 334 2157 485,205-0 2030 3435 2540 400 2465 109 069;, 2995 i 2016 123 2793 2287 2627 ry 2108�° 354, 506-1 2094 416 187, 278-0 • 2564 1375 � 262 186 2050 280 2024 356 2540 354 2422 151 2415 200 2051 300, 607-1 3305, 5200-0 . , 4 404 2119 166 2418 4625 2514 414 2539 453 µ 158E 1777 2423 202 2086 177 208\1 232 2146 461 NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING Oro Valley Town Council The Town Council will hold a public meeting on Wednesday, January 16, 2013, 6 p.m. Oro Valley Town Hall, 11000 N. La Canada Dr. Oro Valley, Arizona Planned Area Development (PAD) Exemption from the existing Sign System Guidelines for directional signage in Rancho Vistoso, OV312-008. The PAD Exemption would allow the Vistoso Community Association to update the appearance of their directional signage consistent with Town sign standards. Review and possible approval of a Master Sign Program for San Dorado located on the east side of Oracle Road at 1st Avenue, OV312-009. Conceptual Public Art for the "San Dorado" Commercial development, located within the Oro Valley Town Centre at Rooney Ranch PAD, on the east side of Oracle Road and First Avenue, OV1212-08. The meeting will be in the Town Council Chambers. The public is encouraged to attend and will be invited to speak. An agenda for this meeting will be made available at least 24 hours prior to meeting time and can be viewed at www.orovalleyaz.gov. For questions and additional information, please contact Matt Michels, Senior Planner, at (520) 229-4822 or mmichels(a7orovalleyaz.gov Posted: 12/26/2012 Time: 11:00 A.M. By: rmf F:\1 DIS DEPT SUPPORT\INDIVIDUAL\ROSEANNE F\Noticing\Town Council\2013\P_TC notice 011613.doc I b or .. /e f j i r "; g .. � t i r : .,_. k ..,,, i r 4- } 3 A It: 7 t u r 0 C " J y e s 4 x ,w. b. r_- «_.d..�., ...,,. a-.. _. _' .. � .,. - s _ � 4 1 - - i ' : -.' A , } n Master Signage Program I November 21, 2012 Prepared for E [2:111iiniiii 1707 East Highland Avenue #100 Phoenix, Arizona 85016 (602) 264-4411 APPROVED BY: C/PZ/DRB/BOA �. DAT PZ PROJE T MA R , r SAN DORADO TABLE OF CONTENTS Project History 1 Signage Hierarchy 2 Freestanding Signage Matrix 3 Freestanding Signage Location Plan 4 Signage Types Al Project Identification 5 B1 Multi-Tenant Monument 6 B2 Single Tenant Monument 6 C Multi-Family Single Tenant Monument 7 D1 Project Directory 8 D2 Directionals 8 Tenant Identification Signage Matrix 10 Tenant Design Standards 11 Signage Types Individually Illuminated Letters 12 Thin Profile Panels 19 Custom Wall Units 13 Awning / Canopy 13 Projecting Signs 13 Arcade / Shingles 14 Window Graphics 14 Backdoor Identification 14 Typical Building Elevations and Sign Locations 15-19 Master Criteria / General Requirements 20 4 SAN DORADO Comprehensive Signage Program PROJECT HISTORY All signage elements focus on a simple Site Wayfinding Color/Material Palettes vocabulary of materials—rock, steel, mass The stipulations on creating a 360° architecture, Site Planning and Design of materials, planting, lighting and colors. locating closer to the street than other sites, San Dorado is a 27±-acre mixed use development Combined with the graphic materials of aluminum shortens the 'cueing" throughout the site and - which will include a Mark Taylor multi-family with a "corten steel" like finish, dimensional the viewing allows the driver to have time M rF housing, office space, public gathering areas and lettering and logo treatments, signage becomes to visually locate their destination. Vehicular , 40,000± of retail space. it is situated on a triangular representative of established brands within the oriented directory and directional signs will be piece of property, cut in half by 1st Avenue and the overall design theme and palettes. Variations provided along internal roadways and driveways ., .-. , _ _ - Prs back side lined bythe Rooneyash. at necessarydecisionpoints to assist in quicker Y in design distinguish the different uses on the q cker `` s _ site—through simplicity—not over designed or navigation of the site. Even though the frontage alongOracle Road 9 9 cluttered with details. - stretches for 2750 feet, the internal layout of the Adjacent to Oracle and 1st Avenue, pedestrian Powder Coat"Rust" Matthews Silver three uses will create a pedestrian-oriented project Functional Requirements directionals to the public space and canal trail that will encourage the 'live-work-play' atmosphere As a local retail center, signage for identification system will be installed to provide assistance. for those living there. However, location on and recognition to customers is inter-dependant the busiest street through the town, and as a on high profile signage to support high sales Tenant Identification Signs designated state highway,the need for adequate volumes. Building signage will be allowed on the fronts signage for tenant recognition and safe traffic flow and rear elevations of the business due to the into the site. This will require the signage along the The sign package has been designed to provide dual loaded site design. In addition to building road to be designed for vehicular design strategies. a hierarchy of elements to meet the spectrum of mounted signage, projecting, canopy and/ In short, the project site is located at the center of functional signage needs,from identification to or awning mounted signs will also be allowed Oro Valley's business and transportation corridors. the pedestrian experience approaching the front for each business where appropriate for the -- door, as follows: architecture and viewing opportunities. Dunn Edwards Dunn Edwards San Dorado represents 27 acres. It has 128,000+ Nomatic Taupe New cork DE 6192 cRv53 DE 6180 LRV33 square feet of residences, 40,280 of retail and Signage Types Menu Boards restaurant space, and 19,750 of future office (Not shown on the plans at this time) opportunities. The retail will be anchored with two Entry Way Monumentation For drive-through restaurants, ordering and menu national tenants. in addition to identity for the center, it is essential boards will be provided along the drive-through 1111111 to identify the major tenants on the monuments lanes. These are designed and provided by Design Concept that flank the main entries to the mixed use each of the individual users needs, based on the ALUMINUM STOREFRONT project site. allocations found in the sign matrix. Dark Bronze Freestanding signs are "excerpts" of architectural components of the building theme and materials. Street-level Identity Pedestrian Signs 414 r 41i Instead of mini buildings,the freestanding Monument signs will be provided along the Pedestrian-oriented window signs will be used ,�,monum n --�� '�� e is become statements in the frontages of Oracle Road and 1st avenue which to identify businesses and to provide information i , :mil environment. Architectural and textured walls identify the various projects and tenants. Two related to the business, such as hours of k _,l�n. that create simple expression for the project operation and emergency telephone numbers. P P P j tenant identification types of monument signs are P g y p ti)i),,identification. Accent elements and materials are used. A single tenant monument which identifies -0 ,. to. ieti, ailor, used for tenant identification areas for both retail, the primary road entrance to the pad users. And Shingle signs are also allowed, but not required. ' t fi residential and future office. Each combination multi-tenant monuments at secondary entrances Shingle signs will be at the discretion of the : gmailifi of wall and accent is integrated into the site with to the retail sites, identifying the in-line users. tenant within the signage matrix outline. � � `' simple,yet formal landscaped areas and lighting Gabion Rock Walls features. Page 1 , , SAN DORADO Freestanding Signage Hierarchy 1- l; iit• fix —. ri r ,r t a. t SAN DORADO \ / \(( t f SAN DO��D � � ,�^x � +� � ^ ems, Al -Primary Entry Monument - SAN DORADO l4 Tenant One giblikli r'' Tenant Three Cf Q>o-�1I f Tenant Four File Villas ,1ddtiO�.fCVS T{41 ,1 ,v tpharmacy San Dorado ,r.riu o�.Thru , It u B1 -Multi-Tenant Monument(Retail) B2-Single Tenant Monument(Retail) C-Residential Monument D1-Vehicular Directory 03-Pedestrian Directional D2-Vehicular Directional Page 2 SAN DORADO Freestanding Signage Matrix SIGN TYPE LOCATION Q SQUARE FOOTAGE /CALCULATIONS TOTAL ILLUMINATION MATERIALS S.F. Al - Entry Gateway Monuments Oracle Road and 1st Avenue 2 18'tall max/72 s.f. -One(1) per street 142 Indirect, Internal and Metal panels with routed-push through text side Backlit and dimensional logo shape and individual letters B1 - Multi Tenant Identity Oracle Road 5 10'tall max/48 s.f. each 240 Internal -Metal panels with routed-push through text and dimensional logos. Individual letters on metal sign cabinet. B2- Single Tenant Identity Oracle Road and 1st Avenue 3 6' tall/25 s.f. 75 Internal Metal panels with routed-push through text and dimensional logos. Individual letters on metal sign cabinet. C- Multi-Family Identity 1st Avenue 1 6' tall/25 s.f. 25 ` External ground Individual letters stud mounted to mounted uplights background. D1 - Directory At entry off 1st Avenue 2 8' tall/50 s.f. 100 r Non-illuminated Metal panels with vinyl graphics D2- Directionals On specific sites TBD 4' tall /6 s.f. NA Non-illuminated Metal panels with vinyl graphics D3 - Pedestrian Directional 1st Avenue 1 6'tall/2 s.f. NA Non-illuminated Metal panels with vinyl graphics E- Menu Boards Throughout site interior where 2 per site 6'tall max/32 s.f. N/A Internal Per graphic and architectural standards of (Not shown on location map) needed (as rqd) tenants branding TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGES (AGGREGATE SIGNAGE USAGE) 582 Page 3 SAN DORADO N \. Signage Location Plan \-.., ,, 0 Al Entry Gateways Monuments ti,, \\ \\ 0 Signage locations have been defined based on \ ‘, \ ,' tit\ 61-Multi-tenant Monuments the lineal front footage of the overall project and �\; ■ 62-Single Tenant Monuments per the signage types defined in the Oro Valley ' �� Signage Code. These are shown in the calculation �` �^ ` .. Cl - Multi-Family Monument matrix on the previous page. �\`ti, ., P. i \. ,�# , . , V D1 -Directory Locations, sizes and quantities illustrate the )\\\\:\ maximum allowed for the site. Total signage to be NS‘s::\o `g d' .,,A `��' A, D2-Directionals fabricated and installed shall be at the discretion Q� �,of the owner based on tenant requests and the � enuB oa�rdseconomic conditions. \• _ r hown on site as typical-not specific) \ / .' /5. .,...--, \ \ 'edestrian Directionals SITE DATA -COMMERCIAL Cs , ,' '- uv� 0, \ yi)' / SITE AREA.NET• 526158 s f 209 Ac t' I r.'+: "^ 9 p� � TOTAL SU WING AREA 66 880 sr -~' •, ti ,••,.. ,; ��` ,:\,_,/ FAR 3 6 W TN G tN AS 2 STORY r4 t - 'lt1: snorsN# -; , P PARK NG PROV DED 386 Spaces -: •- % e. fir t�� PARK NG RAT 0 511 000' ‘1 - ,\ ' '''' -N. A 7:2.-..). '• '''''''// ,,,,' •,,,. le 0IL \ • ®-4- ; PAOA /. ` H. \ C; \ SITE DATA - RESIDENTIAL MR 1 ..Q Net (. v� �, `� e► i�''� \ Site Area a 9l sf.f 5.13 Ac R i -� __ i• ,. _ :; Total Bu d n Area/ . a / g 314917 sl. �. " r• /��' 1 wit+-fern y Un t5 215 2-Story1 3-5t Units �;• ;sir. �--!— 3-Story l r 1.. \ (J .I /�i/•' Total Bur kl ne Footp►At. 12a05®s f r�� ` .I WO 1�, -sz t ,.A:4/+ .Coverage BbbS 1 ® l'-, ^ e �3�r'' a '~� y i• !?I' �um,`' Dens ty 18 du/Ac- L /""1 ! 1' 1 I r .All> 4 1 �� O Parking Prov ded 538 Spaces .. `i 1 .1_( r,sl #t.• 40:-.4..1 N•V•')•1 4,,/%'.,-I-*--t Qn Parklny}fit o 95 ps/du - - \c44'01. II \\\ 04:. I _ _ diiidiA i , A _ _ _2 sN_____ _7(1.40 ::::LJ e'"---71. 4 , ,..._ j..L.,_ 'It _ ii ,,,,.-‘,41.j24:4,41 it;.;.:7\ .: \.\\ \ I a,,:,__ i . a .41 1111Pdi_044 1110._. illb_i, lof_01P_i.. .___,,ly,ig.), lift; illiPH:Feilb_i:__, . tik.1 7 / f_Ille 166 I 11641 1641}fillillibi'' L 4. 116.4 i"!'" 'i' i!I 641 rk 4P---ff °:t . .1" '1-i-ii i v 1 . Ip,''41.. i".. -, -..a..all N MIL "d4/ - ' -- �^ -�. Page 4 D Al- Project Identification \\ \c\\\\\ ...\\:.D / , @?\SN/.._..\//A,,. 6N ,DOfl.AD (at Main Entrance)Oracle Road and 1st Avenue project identification with major tenant signage elements flanking theentry point. Signage is incorporated into the architecturally themed landscape walls and formal - � �� planting. " `s--- peo -'6d. \ \ Materials: Steel and rock gabian wall % e background with Corten steel \:).. • look finished aluminum ��,� `" 'f Construction: "San Dorado" - individual pan channel letters, aluminum sides and white faces / Height: Project ID - 7'-0" /` ^" / Tenants - 18'-0" fir Letter Height: Project ID -28" , 4t! r, 3,� i., Tenants -9" Y� � ' ° 4., . / v k�`di. A `,. 3 m 1" f'' )111 iii Sign Area: Project ID- 2 -4 x 15 -0 /36 s.f. R _Tenants -8'-4"x 8'-6"/70 s.f. = . SAN DOADO _ ,,i, ,t II, ��,,, �$` 1, ,„I1 �4 §t ,J Colors: Panel: Rusted Steel -'��` I. Letters: Brushed Aluminum 4a.Y �in Lights: white Illumination: SAN DORADO lettering - a'4" ir External ground uplights and halo backlit Tenant panels- Internal ' Nt i; 23,8" . , ii1( y i - " 01 . 4 r � "' / \ k'illik i k Ill/,0 ff . , , / 1„1\riik,__,1 'ilk: 0 ' k , 'ft 5,4v,r? DOR � _ . .. , - SAN., 1.., :k. '' .,,Aitt\1/4 •,)-- '" ifil•.,‘,' 4/,-, ,.471),F'''r - - - - - -: , _ ,,_, - . • I# „,„,...-- 4 x !' •-------- I k-s* - - -. 1! w� .e "�.,r4,r46 ' �~A°'ftti '- ---. r- r rat:} ,w ,.. ..l, .� —ems �, ' — —Li"' Page 5 SAN DORADO B - Tenant Monumentation B1 - Multi-Tenant Identification ok ,. o , N Tenant monuments to be located along roadways Located along Oracle Road for multi-tenant I ♦ t • at major project entry drives or single tenant identification of retail and future office tenants. building entry drives to assist in wayfinding and a'-a" identification. Height: 10'-8"to top of sign panel ♦ 6. o" (1 per first 300 feet of street ? i Each tenant monument sign includes the name frontage) of the project/development and address where applicable to the entry. Sign Area: Project ID- 8 1/2"x 4'-0"/2.6 s.f. .1r r SAN DORADO Tenants - 6 -8 x6-0 /40s.f. my Construction # i 14_ Tenant On e Materials: Aluminum cabinets and tenant �A panels, with vertical gabion rii t. caged stone pillars and aluminum posts - ir. WO oenant Three Project Identification EIVA Tenant Four / \ Project ID: San Dorado to be individual WIC:IN1 letters routed from background .t, ?� r ) with acrylic push-thru iii IN i ..-. P 10 f `r Colors: Cabinets- Rusted steel ` cE 1 ",. i ‘' gm aiiIIIIIIVAM am - White t` " Lettering �. .-= . ., �' �r �" � .,`� e Posts/gabions -to match Terra Cotta Tile Tenant Panels Materials: Aluminum tenant panels with B2 - Single-Tenant Identification painted non-directional finish, 10.-4" routed copy with push-thruOP acrylic Located along Oracle Road for and 1st Avenue for 8,'oN , single tenants primary entry for identification of Color: Panels- Matthews Silver retail tenants. e _ —___ SAN DORADO Height: 6'-0"to top of sign panel Graphics - Per tenant corporate standard colors and logo/letter (1 per first 300 feet of street N ANCHOR s le frontage) c in r7� � � TENANT l Illumination: Internal Sign Area: Project ID - 8 1/2"x 4'-0"/2.6 s.f. ( r , . 1, Tenants-3'-2"x 8'-0"/ 25 s.f. l �, ��',` Page 6 SAN DORADO C - Multi-Family Monument „„,0-fff111111 fill rill ' 1 1 1 1 4"1 +1 Entry Monument located along 1st Avenue within .,;r� - `� project. This sign type is a "brand" style for all i..`' � C "`` _ '�� - _ Vim•` "'t ti. IT 111111111111110"."-- the , Mark Taylor developments and complements the ;�:; _ E . l l 1, �- southwest architectural style of the residences. tit" i ii: ",-.40,7, _ :Y� III , emit Lill 1111111- till I! pm--Liiii_0( -,--- — Construction - Iji ? lin -- I 44 - - ■ink rI�I■ 1 T-- Materials: Aluminum cabinets, masonry - — _ _ E . bases and Corten steel look Sign Location Elevation • NTS post and beam architectural g embellishments. Height/Area: Max. of 6' 0" Sign Area: Project ID - 3' 0"x 8'-2" / 25 s.f. Letter Height: 11 ir--- _-. W 7- -7tt ' II II 1 A tz Project Identification .= Letters: Flat cut out aluminum letters stud mounted to background wall 13'-8" Color: Painted, Dark rusticated finish r— 1,_ 8'-2"± Graphics: Final lettering typeface and numbers to be determined by _ owner. �. -- 1 12345 y 7 -- 6u1111PI he Villas Illumination External ground mounted uplights - . �.__ �� c I at San Dorado ,..alta,„40.- 4 4 r,'„. .6 ti r'y :0 _`"ios iiirC.._ _ -I Ti Page 7 SAN DORADO D - Directory/Directionals D1 - Directory D2 - Directionals D3 - Pedestrian Directionals Directional signs shall be located along interior Located along Oracle Road for multi-tenant Located throughout the retail portion of the Located along 1st Avenue to direct pedestrains roadways as required to assist in wayfinding. identification of retail and future office tenants. project as needed. and cyclist to the wash trail and civic space. Height: 8'-0"to top of sign panel Height: 4'-0"to top of sign panel Height: 6'-0"to top of sign panel Construction Sign Area: Panels- 5'-8"x 3'-2"/20 s.f. Sign Area: Panels- 4'-2"x 3'-2"/ 5.8 s.f. Sign Area: Panels- 18'x 16" Materials: Aluminum cabinets, Corten steel look finished backer cabinets Letter Height: 3" Letter Height: 3" Letter Height: 1.5" with aluminum directional panels and painted aluminum support posts. Colors: Cabinets- Rusted steel Panels- Matthews Silver Posts-To match terracotta tile Lettering - Black reflective Illumination: Non-illuminated 3...9-. / / 3'-2" / I / Rx Drive Thru 4 3.Q_ Food Drive Thru 3 , ' A , / / Office Building 3 r ic. • x Tenant 1 • 2'4" , / / Tenant 2 Path and Tenant 3 , / _ o , Tenant 4 �• / ` DVS Tenant 5 7 \ Drive Thru Tenant 6 r Additional o Bakeryi ' Parkin '"� ' Drive Thru / 3 9 , / 4.'r r`.., , ,. ,,,.:,'i, .4 1 f,,,,' r't , .._.., , 6111. EMINMMINIRM elp r , ''..,..• \ num, D2 - Directional D1 - Directory D3 - Pedestrian Directional Page 8 SAN DORADO Fascia/VVall Mounted Signs Projecting Signs Tenant Signage Design dl te ,i(jPili'l 4 ,0 444::'44 Standards X . ` ',*S;UiNor EAliiY .„ in r` A: L.N..-..-,..--C,41.t..., # ` tiF"m II Ica y` S + - All Tenants must have storefront signs fabricated +' ,[ . �` from either individual an channel reversepan p I IF \i/iv E, "'"�� channel letters and logos, dimensional cut out or I _.+ 1 t ril i ! 0 ,_ cast panels, projecting and/or "custom" cabinets. - - _{ �► � nji,r _ Creative designs, forms, and the usePP s� � j ,, 9 of "custom cabinet signs are encouraged (see the following rt 1 , 6 = , pages for examples). Unless as part of a nationally X s 4 - ._ - "` registered and/or trademarked logo, rectangular Q shaped cabinets are strictly prohibited. a \\\ Custom Wall Unit Signs Arcade/ Shingle Signs Square footages for tenant identification per the P flit(i .w ' r matrix may be reduced based on the locations and r �., �; specific building conditions. 1 ii .,,,,,,r,,,,,, :.-4 , sA. NN .. i Design Approval �. ,. 2 ki II - ,. ,•. All signs, including under canopy blade, window :_=r. h� )1 � ► and back-door si na a desi ns and la Awning/Canopy Signs � I � 9 g g youts will be ,, ,,� -= __ ., approved on an individual basis by the Developer r t ' ' ° / l' ii, it -: b.t.:,,h.,„ * �, prior to permit application to ensure a level of 4 , quality and aesthetics for the project. •Vitillib, ., 3 \ 4°>. -.fr a': sx i ''., 1 iii. ■1 , A#B lu, , 1, ‘......„-,,,„,,.... _ cd'it,,,,,ifec t i vi. NI , fir if 1 ,A , , T.=T. I' ! c 't l yam,._`_ i.: Page 9 SAN DORADO Tenant Wall Signage Matrix TENANT SIGNS LOCATIONS QTY SQUARE FOOTAGE INDIVIDUAL ILLUMINATION MATERIALS CALCULATIONS MAXIMUM LETTER HT Pad Tenants(freestanding) Three elevations that offer Min. 1 / For building elevations containing wall signs, a sign may be a 72" Maximum Internally illuminated, Aluminum, acrylic, readability- including rear Max. 3 minimum of twenty-four(24)square feet,with no single wall sign halo backlit, LED's or painted metal, elevations per tenant containing more than one (1)square foot of sign for each linear foot other equal sources of building frontage,for a maximum sign area of one hundred fifty to create a silhouette, Shops(freestanding bldgs) Three elevations that offer Min. 1 / (150)square feet. 72" Maximum indirect down lights Shops(in-line) readability-including rear Max. 3 and/or combination Aluminum, acrylic, elevations per tenant Wall signs for building elevations further than three hundred (300) of lighting methods painted metal, feet from the street may contain no more than one and one-half mentioned herein. (1-1/ )rfee 6f sign areaforedc1i linear foo frontage,for a Office Building TBD TBD . --maximum sign area of two hundred (225)square feet. TBD Halo backlit Metal All Tenants Under canopy areas only I per 4 s.f. Maximum NA Non-illuminated Aluminum, acrylic, Arcade/Shingles in front of tenant's leased public painted metal,vinyl space. entry graphics Maintain 9' clearance AFF Window Graphics Business Name 1 per Maximum two (2)square feet 2" high Non-illuminated except Vinyl, paint, gold- (This is a compilation per frontage for "open" and "closed" leafing, or 3-dimensional Oro Valley Code) Hours of Operation Maximumm of one(1)square foot signs manequins or graphics for display Sign Band:for displaying No higher than the midpoint of the overall height of the windows either the name of the from grade. Copy may not business or logo in multiple exceed fifty successions. percent(50%) of the total band Display Area:The display Maximim of six(6)square feet. length area shall be located on Business and/or tenants with building frontage in excess of forty(40) the first immediate window feet may have one(1) additional display area. to the right or left of the entrance door *Note: if entrance door cannot be utilized,then the sign may be located where it will not interfere with any other sign types, under this provision. Temporary Signs On site For all temporary signage - refer to Section 28.6 Temporary Signs of the Oro Valley Sign Code. Page 10 SAN DORADO Brand Identity Colors Illumination Copy and/or logos utilized shall be Tenant's Letter face colors are limited to the standards Leased Frontage } Tenant building signage may be internally choice, subject to the approval of Developer plexiglas and or acrylic color standards (See chitectural Elevation defined by fenestration or other detai illuminated, halo backlit with neon, LED's or 80%of Architectural Elevation and/or Developer's agents prior to submittal for attached color brochure)with the exception that t other equal sources to create a silhouette, and/ permitting through the Town of Oro Valley. no fluorescent colors will be allowed. Trim Caps or combination of lighting methods mentioned for pan channels must match either letter face or herein. All national retailers shall be permitted to utilize standard duranodic dark bronze return color to their standard corporate identification programs match store front finish. ■■ For National Tenants and specially approved non- subject PP subject to sign area limitations contained in the I internally illuminated applications, supplemental approvedComprehensive Sign Plan wall signage For National Tenants, additional colors for faces, ',r. ._._.. lighting may be provided for appropriate signage matrix. returns and retainers maybeper corporate ' P :g _ ._ recognition. The supplemental lighting must standards after review and appoval by Owner Tenant ,s ° ,-, be incorporated into the facade or wall de ' P sign No tenant signage will be allowed to be and/or Owners Representative. either as a concealed feature, design element, or dominated by the service/or product it provides, J architecturally approved fixture i.e. decorative nor be the "tenant Identification". Exhibit A- Panel Calculation accent fixtures, pin down lights, goosenecks, Sign Area Calculation architectural finished cabinets, etc). See matrix for individual sizes and restrictions. A sign mounted on a delineated background • (W) • Lighting source may include flourescents or NAIL SALON panel or area distinctively painted, textured or LED's and various forms and shapes. Lighting constructed that integrates with the signage • --------T--------------- sig ni --- ` components are not strictly specified. Designs and/or is colored from the tenants corporate = ' shall be approved by the Owner. Bold and blocky san serif as service ID only standards colors shall be counted as part of the -- en a n not allowed signage area See exhibit (H)x(W) = square footage Calculation of sign area shall be the area within the smallest rectangle to enclose all elements Exhibit B Letter Calculation The rt of S Light Fixture of the graphics, and or two when an icon is NAIL SALON separate from the text. (See exhibit B). San serif font used with a name and style I-+--Wall Surface i„ 411( allowed Height and Length Calculation LEASED FRONTAGE , LEASED FRONTAGE ARCHITECTURAL In no event shall any sign exceed eighty(80°,%0) , ARCHITECTURAL FRONTAGE FRONTAGE ,, -•41---LI htThrow percent of the building elevation and/or wall BOX ARCH FRONTgGF g0%ARCH FRONTAGE _ g surface upon which it is placed. The available _ _ _ =_ i---- _ +1 Sign Panel T e rt of gfras surface area of the architectural sign area shall a ' ITenantSignage ABC TENANT regulate letter height not exceeding 80%vertical i _ ,� �`� NAIL SALON height. (See exhibit C) 1k li-. -1_s SA4LLEY HA-A1101!•LOREAL•LANCOME `._.. ---, A minimum of 1/2 the letter height line spacing r t,—j The use of LED's is highly encouraged for energy shall be used between all multiple lines of .AR CHIT AWNING R WIDTH , economics and good "green" building practices. signage layouts. ALAWNING If LED's are used, white GE should be used to Exhibit C- Height and Length Calculation ensure color and light metrics provide the best use of materials and resources and consistency. Page 11 R&H Pantone/ CYRO R&H Pantone/ CYRO R&H Pantone/CYRO R&H Pantone/CYRO R&H Pantone/CYRO Yellow C, Black C, 2037 407_2 2115 485 2114 288, 605-0 308 �m. 321 2025 199-0 of 3347328 — , 015-22325 106 12329'2283 485, 211 -1298 :111407 j a 2465 109 2157 485,205-0 2069 2995 ' 2030 3435 2540 400 2016 123 2793 187, 278-0 2287 2627 ' 2108 ` 354, 506-1 2094 416 0 III 2564 1375 2262 186 2050 280 024 356 2540 354 2422 1 51 2415 200 205 1 300, 607-1 3305, 5200-0 2404 404 2119 � - 14 414 166 2418 4625 2539 453 3158 1777 a' 2423 202 2086 177 E20851 232 2146 461 SAN DORADO Tenant Identification Signs Typical Reverse Pan Channel Letter Dimensional Letters Thin Profile Panels _ With Halo Illumination c ` a. 11 i t =� ' 050' Aluminum return t 125"aluminum faces -" 'Or welded to returns with .P N, r •. _ __ continuous weld. ��. % - ,/,‘ ; ' . Wall mounted signage is anysignplaced or t' \ 050' aluminum rad cut applied directly against a bearing and/or non- backer. ','� t \ 'f bearing wall connected to a building structure, LED's mounted to returns. - i 1\ , 1 ' with the exposed face of the sign in a plane , r Clear acrylic backer panel Typically cut or cast from all metals, usual) °---Y - approximately parallel to the plane of the wall. to prevent nesting andY provide halo illumination. aluminum and bronze, or resin composite with Signage shall be allowed to project outward from the wall not more than twelve(12) inches + specialty finishes, or stone. Other materials ` � J Box to connector. ca T+++i <j.: may be considered based on the use within the for individual letters, or eighteen (18) inches for Power supply per LED It J . design. custom cabinet signs. Signage may be placed on Designs must be dimensional in nature and manufactures ''�� three elevations. specifications ., respond to the building facade design. Dimensional letters or graphics less than 1/4" Paint letter interior with ! Internally Illuminated Letters bright wh to Matthews thick will not permitted. The type of metal and Thin profile panel and cast plaques must be paint for reflectivity , the design of the typography shall be taken into of quality metals and finishes. Signs located The use of a standard or typical pan channel or " :.1 I consideration for the minimum depth of material at pedestrian levels shall be a maximum of 4 reverse pan channel letters shall conform to the Weep holes in tow points used, inches deepand ease all edges to minimum fabrication standards below. letters(2)minimum. g ensure ADA compliant requirement and to prevent nicks, cuts Returns: minimum of.050 aluminum with a full Typical Pan Channel Letter Traditionally mounted or pin mounted to the face or scrapes. welded seams. 050'Aluminum return of the Storefront area or Base Building façade Faces: i"retainerss — with external, indirect illumination. Faces must be opaque and contrasting in color, Pan channels- Minimum 1/8", solid color or �' texture, or material from one another to create , 12s•'acrylic faces ___ �. Pin mounted depth should be a maximum of depth and dimension. The maximum depth of the high quality translucent film. 1" off fascia (based on graphic size)toprevent cabinet is twelve inches 1 " No painted finishes will be allowed. { 9 P { 2 )from the wall or sign .050"aluminum cad cut intense shadowing and illegibility. band behind when installed above 80" on the back with LED's mounted wall. Reverse pan channel letter faces must be a to backer. Pin mounts shall be located in the least visible minimum of 1/8" thick aluminum. location to support the letters. Pin mounts Routed metal panels of custom shapes lettering, P visible within the one-inch dimension between typically indirectly illuminated but can be Self-contained letter construction is highly the background surface and the back of the internallyand halo backlit based on recommended where possible to prevent nesting J Box to connector. i. the overall letters shall be painted to match the background design. in the backs. No visible raceways are permitted. Power supply per LED manufactures surface or to visually disappear. pecufications Illumination Paint letter Interior with I Flush mounted signs shall use stud or pin Signs may be internally, externally, indirectly, or bright white Matthews a combination thereof. When internal or halo paint for reflectivity mount hardware with silicone fill into pre drilled mounting holes. illuminated, the use of GE LED's is the preferred method. Weep holes in tow points i._.____f of letters(2)minimum. t Page 12 SAN DORADO Custom Wall Unit Signs Custom Wall Unit •3•2. 1 • Projecting Signs I --ea ' These sign types can be known as marquee or �� ,. 4 i CUSTOM ALUMINUM FACED ( } a l ` WALL UNIT WITHMULTI-LEVEL I flag-mounted signs which are double faced and PLANES FOR LETTERING AND i 44 4 ,' GRAPHICS �- mounted perpendicular to the building front. Y ii r y :; ♦ _ DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PLANESRI k I •' TO BE AT LEAST 1" _ L. } Design must include multiple layers with a mix + N. 'PRIMARY NAME"LETTERING - T,,� ti . INDIVIDUAL PAN OR REVERSE of opaque,translucent backgrounds and various . ',�7`'k �" ; ilit, PAN CHANNEL LETTERING _ .;._)4 0 .11114111Q } ' if .-,.., __ll 1.ili F. .•, types of lettering, and illumination methods, - ak it„.....ELECTRICAL LEAD TO ` .' fabricated as a single unit.L � EXTERNAL SOURCE 1,; r._ • INTERNAL ILLUMINATiC N t.,. Creative designs and forms are encouraged. `_,$ �- 5"HIGH COPY(OR LESS)CAN I Unless part of a nationally registered and/or .`' BE ROUTED GRAPHICS WITH ACRYLIC BACK UP OR I! trademarked logo, rectangular shaped designs :.. .. "` ,.--- PUSH-THROUGHt t COPY/GRAPHICS' are prohibited without Owner's overriding These sign types are multiple layered and sided LIGHT SOURCE TO BE I APPROVED BY OWNER r approval. in design with a mix of opaque, translucent backgrounds and various types of lettering, and �- O --- Construction illumination methods, fabricated as single units. g Projecting signs will require the coordination of YtifAtRE* the architectural drawings for structural integrity. Unless part of a nationally registered and/or Materials used should be light in weight yeti 0 trademarked logo, rectangular shaped designs withhold required wind loads for signage. i \\1 `" ,,,$ are prohibited without Owner's overriding _ , thapproval. Custom Walt Unit Added structural design and physical . tEVEt�tVil LEVELCali requirements to accommodate 3-D signage t _# b ' ,,�.1 A"... ' Construction ' 3 '2' r installations will be at the tenant's expense. .# ` f= CUSTOM ALUMINUM FACED Custom Wall Unit signs are required to have WALL UNIT WITH MULTI LEVEL PLANES FOR LETTERING AND i the primary name to be dimensional letters on GRAPHICS _-- Illumination ,,x opaque backgrounds. DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PLANES -1 Projecting signs may be internally, externally, — " ,.._.� i TO BE AT LEAST 1" '" I indirectly or a combination thereof. -PRIMARY NAME'LETTERING --It-- Secondary copy less than 5" can be internally REVERSE PAN CHANNEL j I LETTERING a illuminated as a routed and push through acrylic ALUMINUM BACKER PLATE >, No movement, chasing or flashing lights will be p, process. WITH LED STRIPS FOR `` allowed. INTERNAL AND HALO l L,. x., ILLUMINATION 1 dl i r Illumination CLEAR ACRYLICT RY BACKER TO ! j . Custom Wall Unit signs may be internally, 5"HIGH COPYCOR LESS)CAN II.- i►, externally, indirectly, or a combination thereof. BE ROUTED GRAPHICS WITH I! ACRYLIC BACK UP OR i When Custom Wall Unit signs are used, the PUSH-THROUGH COPY/GRAPHICS' I i1 background surface(s) adjacent to the sign should LIGHT SOURCE TO BE i — -- 1 be halo illuminated as well to provide definition of APPROVED BY OWNER the signs' shape. • Page 13 SAN Of1AO Pedestrian Oriented Signs Arcade / Shingle Signs Window Graphics & Merchandise Display Area Printed menus are not allowed to be taped Under pedestrian arcade/canopy areas, tenants Shingle sign as a suspended — Shingle sign flag — a to windows. Menus for take out or eat in sin from canopy. mounted to storefront + may have one (1) arcade sign located at the under canopy. i '.r g restaurants, or in-store services must be within primary entry. Tenants with more than one public - , R u' :a an architecturally integrated, enclosed design entry will be allowed a maximum of two (2) '! '� element and shall not exceed the 25%of the arcade signs onlyif the entries are on different window/panel area. These may be internally elevations. Both shall be of the same design . -- �. 1 illuminated. and construction. The tenant shall be allowed to create their own unique panel appropriate to No continuous "black-out" sheeting will be the store front and their recognized corporate Suite Numbers shall appear directly over each allowed. Merchandise display areas must be identity and design theme, subject to Owner's entry, to be applied white vinyl on the exterior of provided of the tenants products/graphics. approval. ,_ the glass. 6" high suite numbers to be displayed in Futura Condensed Medium. Back Door Signage Each Tenant will use a their own design, with Shingle sign flag Shingle sign suspended All shops and freestanding buildings with exterior, approval from the owner prior to permit mounted to storefront from pedestrian arcade. Shop Name and Hours of operation shall appear non public entrances may have identification application. For cost efficiencies and design/ under awning ADA Iadjacent to each entry, to be applied vinyl construction uniformity, all under canopy blade requires 80"clearance. MI MIEN on the signage located at the rear of the building.This 'I exterior of the glass. Layout to be approved by signage shall be non-illuminated and shall not signs will be manufactured by the Owner/ Owner/Landlord - see matrix for allowable area. exceed four(4) square feet in area. 111 Landlord's project sign contractor. _ 11-1 4 1 IIIII Design Restrictions Construction Storefront graphics may not be "off the shelf" - I ,0 Graphics shall be flat cut out letters and elements, prefabricated emulating neon tubing elements or surface applied to both sides of the display. Each use of fluorescent colors. shop Tenant shall furnish and install the approved i copy for said display at Tenant's sole and separate - No printed, hand lettered, window painted sales - expense. Tenant shall pay for all costs associated promotions will be allowed. with the production and mounting of Tenant's blade sign copy. SUITE 100 • ` Installation TENANT NAME - __ _. Minimum 9'-0" above finished floor. SECONb LINE 1 a Orientation—Perpendicular to storefront. L_ -.- , '20 _ —^ n i This signage shall not count against the Tenant's _, t � square footage allotment. , k__ -- 1 A TYPICAL STORE FRONT Scale:NTS Page 14 SAN I1UA1I1tJ Typical Signage / Building Elevations Page 15 SAN OftAO Typical Signage Elevations - Major Pad Tenantl. _ ,_. , ___ . . . _,_ , I I Iw r C1S/pharmacY ,,,,11\ 71,, lk 1 . ..,. ;� ..,. Q. North Elevation (1st Avenue) Fri-TT CVSlp y a-_ .. tr West Elevation (Oracle Road) . �. ...w.,.... a _ I Ogg I I t 1 II South Elevation (Internal drive through) 4 r �' . _ � .'., ,, 6, . ' a.- +. ,. '.� gymF . _�,,�. ,. _ East Elevation (internal) Page 16 SAN DORADO Typical Signage Elevations - Shops B Sign envelope locations shown are for illustrative �- purposes only. Quantities and location shall be �T.O.PARAPET determined by leasing. _� _—� ,a - , ► _ Envelopes can be combined for larger tenants #!. ,.a . � . ,. y with larger store frontages -;` �...y _ 01410 :r ` —•- •ss.:a�` _aw�a'_rir.a''•^�""'� _ar.rr:ww�.,�•r�r.l_aw.�' .�.ws err- �, �,_,,/ _.,.- _ ...w.., wnA�.'w a..�..._ .f _ - * -i l -�" Finalsize shall be ` , . , " t alli''� determined by the allowable 1` 'i`�- � ~ �- _ -_ ~�A'r, square footage per the tenant signage matrix. .,• ` `,' < . '•' � eb �` (11 r,' � " r'�� c -' i w Ike-J.. ....-.,- -,-,;,carol iii tick Allit:-.4 -,A , A.... tit 7.s• , m z •� . . 4 ,. • .°,, r• •`, . ' ' , ".r' - 1' a • ....e � k- ' ,�.otioc..„. � Shops B West Elevation (Oracle Road) t24' 8' �t22- .T PARAPE' TT0 PA6RAPET •t2t' 4' t r l • f. . t ,e ; i 1 Shops B East Elevation (Internal ) -;--:1- -- - - - iiii f A+14'-0- f T,O, ARCH .11, .. ..:;ifdr,,,,..,..,. L ,i _ ....,..,. . ,, ..r.....,.._ , ... _.......„ — .,p • t . sr' 1.-!,'"...."-,Xt:::, ,� , O . •�'ff .. �__. .._. .. ` ,_� , _ ,. +' __...,_ .:..,. : ' �C _..,-•• "F -" .s „�+4.t ,�.t"'t, n° c�w`° AY J111 Shops B South Elevation (Internal ) Shops B North Elevation (with Drive-thru ) Page 17 SAN DOADO Typical Signage Elevations - Shops C t 24' 8' +22'-8- �T O�PARAPET Sign envelope locations shown are for illustrative TO PARAPET ,...........i. purposes only. Quantities and location shall be � determined by leasing. Envelopes can be combined for larger tenants ,�� :" , � I � � 114111'- - ; • with larger •, 4 _� 'mama......es'.,.r..... " store frontages ter 1 qiFinal size shall be determined bythe allowable r $ ,� 1 �, '7 , F'� � Jr _ square footage per the tenant signage matrix. = �# -f, A , .. #� ""al ! me s .." '3 ' ` �c t yr,. Shops C West Elevation (Oracle Road) j+24'-8' T.O. PARAPET ,7 TO. ARCH ,...,. , „... .,,i1,..,..,,. _ lly'1 I , !fig s , 'lb i - N, t 1 i '1 v A Shops C East(internal parking) lila _ _ �` _.� w._ T^ PARAPET _. �__. _ �- 411111111111k- ---'''' -k---- - '1'1 * .;:eri 4,,,,'111 gi b,,A1 I I I III 1 I I I I I II k- j-•‘',illi' k* .-411 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 6 I- Ilk ' s. ...,: IT::4.,.. A I III Z.--_,----_--- .--_---_ _tea- ,.... imilailimr 1111 1.it'ti'. .' • 4., -, ii : , 0,i. .aliffat i 4 Sad" 1?. F. IgArSt 1 +t . I' '....; ‘ ' " -. ,.. ivr:" . . _ .. *. ' ,q,,,, � .l.a..._.,.:'. ._, Amide°", '. 4f:. *441' - ..} ., ri �,p '' rf Shops C North Shops C South (plaza area) Page 18 f SAN DORADO Typical Signage Elevations - Shops D +24'-8. r+22•_8- �T 0 PARAPET 7 0 PARAPET Sign envelope locations shown are for illustrative ate, ,. � . p poses only. Quantities and location shall be -� 1' , determined by leasing. :'t � 11 . ., 1� _ f 1• /ice -,' ' , Envelopes can be combined for larger tenants g.„. . "" , �` with larger store frontages. ,� �' l Final size shall be determined by the allowable square footage per the tenant signage matrix. Shops D West Elevation (Oracle Road) t24'-8 +22'-8- T•O.PARAPETS — +21'-4 TO PARAPETj. -r.�.�` T 0 PARAPET _ ___ _.. _ .. ," .,o„1 T.O. ARCH n r - j 4J fir, ....' rImImL1L t . ' ! e° I d ' t '1 Shops D East Elevation (internal parking) MN - .+14'-0` :,1.,:1 1-1;, __ T.Q AR'CH ` {' 1 .-- -^.-...._--_' __`1,_.."._-..-.4-....4.:..: .....-47,..6:::,..I.„,1 4,,,:‘.,.:„1:1I:,,, , rr _"t _ r F Ce err _ ,fir{. --- — -- r. 4 / ,,.,,I 1 fig N. . ,. ttiir r 34 I !It _. ...' '• J fir , i 5:'i3/ ;4 *e' :, ti a .+ %f, ,,,, _ `___!Jill"_ 7 1'4'* i. v t liT. Shops D North Shops D South Page 19 e Attachment 1 Conditions of Approval Master Sign Program for San Dorado 1. Limit internal illumination for cabinet type signs so only the logo and letters emit light. -2 - oQ0 JP��EY AR/10 A •,w�.- ,.°t/NDED b' Development and Infrastructure Services January 25, 2013 Pearson's Signs Ray Giannini 3162 E. 47th Street Tucson, AZ 85713 RE: San Dorado Master Sign Program, OV3-12-009 Dear Mr. Gianni, At their regular meeting on January 16, 2013, the Town Council approved the Master Sign Program for the San Dorado development, subject to the attached conditions of approval. There are no more formal processes required for sign approval other than submitting building permits for individual signs as needed. Please contact me with any questions for concerns. Sincerely, CCIt?:11-A166t Patty Hayes Zoning Plans Examiner (520) 229-4819, phayes(a�orovalleyaz.gov Cc: File Planning Permitting Inspection&Compliance Engineering Operations Transit (520)229-4821 (520)229-4815 (520)229-4815 (520)229-4894 (520)229-5070 (520)229-4990 Caring for our heritage, our community,our future. 11000 N.La Canada Drive•Oro Valley,Arizona 85737 fax: (520)742-1022•www.orovalleyaz.gov - 1 - Attachment 1 Conditions of Approval Master Sign Program for San Dorado 1. Limit internal illumination for cabinet type signs so only the logo and letters emit light. - 2 -