Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOV109203 Case No. OV10-92-3 STATE OF ARIZONA ) TOWN OF ORO VALLEY ) I hereby certify that on 4'‘9")-9a' I caused to be delivered, a legal notice regarding the above-mentioned case to be published in the Daily Territorial on 4/24/92 . A copy of public hearing notice is on file in the Oro Valley Town Hall. I hereby certify that on4- -1'19. I mailed individual letters to all agencies and individuals required, together with notice of public hearing and specific map involved, if any. I hereby certify that on I caused to be posted the subject property in the above- mentioned case. (David Williams, Senior Planner) k* - 4r--) To Clerk Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of , 1992 . Notary Public My commission expires: AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION • STATE OF ARIZONA) :ss. COUNTY OF PIMA 1 I..o r r't t I'"I 1 .:l II i n being first duly sworn, deposes and says that (he) (she) is the Legal Advertising Manager of THE DAILY TERRITORIAL, a daily newspaper printed and published in the County of Pima, State of Arizona, and of general circulation in the City of Tucson, County of Pima, State of Arizona and elsewhere, and the hereto attached NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE Geq!.!.E' t `v Y• t L.- ORO VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT In accordance with Section 1-505 of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised, NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEAR- ING BEFORE THE ORO VAL- LEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT IS HEREBY GIVEN: TIME: at of after 4:30 p.m., was printed and published correctly in the regular and entire issue of said THE Tuesday, May 12, 1992 PLACE: Oro Valley Town Hall Council Chambers, 11000 N. La Canada Drive, Oro Valley, DAILY TERRITORIAL for issues; that the first was made Arizona SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR VARIANCE TO SIDE YARD SETBACK, REDUCE THE SET- on the day of 19 BACK FROM THE REQUIRED 5 FEET TO APPROXIMATELY 3 FEET. LOCATION: 12491 N. Grand- and the last publication thereof was made on the day of villa Canyon,Lot 99,Rancho Vis- toso neighborhood #7 Members of the public are in- vited to attend this meeting and 19 ;that said publication will be given an opportunity to speak. (Plans can be viewed in the office of She Deputy Clerk.) Steve Hagedorn Steve Huge- was made on each of the following dates,to-wit: dorn Planning and Zoning Direc- tor Town of Oro Valley Pub. The Daily Territorial April 24, 1992 Reg: Town of Oro Valley 1505 4/24 lk Request of D The Territorial By Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of 19 Notary Public in and for the County of Pima, State of Arizona My Commission Expires: PLANNING STAFF REPORT TO THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT From: Steve Hagedorn, Planning and Zoning Director Date: May 12, 1992 Re OV10-92-3 US HOME REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO SIDE YARD SL'1'BACK LOT 99, RANCHO VISTOSO, NEIGHBORHOOD 7 Summary: The US Home Corporation is requesting a variance to the side yard requirements of the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development as they apply to Lot 99 in that Neighborhood 7. The buyers of Lot 99 requested that US Home install a double gate on the right side (north side) of Lot 99. This necessitated sliding the entire house 2 feet to the south, resulting in a 3 foot side yard on the south side of the house. The Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development District requires a minimum 5 foot side yard setback for all residential lots in Neighborhood 7. The US Home Corporation presented this request for a reduced sideyard to the Town when they applied for a building permit for Lot 99. US Home was mistakenly told by the Town that, as long as 10 feet was maintained between the buildings on Lots 98 and 99, their request would be approved. The Building Department noted this 10 foot distance between buildings on the building permit. My office subsequently received a call from the owner of Lot 98, to the south of Lot 99, inquiring as to the building setback requirements in his neighborhood. At this point, we discovered that an error had been made in permitting this structure on Lot 99 to be shifted 2 feet to the south, encroaching into the required 5 foot side yard setback. A stop work order was then issued for the construction pending resolution of the matter through the Board of Adj us Lment. Recommendations: As the Board of Adjustment is aware, when reviewing a request for variance, the Board must consider the following findings: A. That there are special circumstances or conditions applying to the property referred to in the application including its size, shape, 0 topography, location or surroundings which do not apply to other properties in the district; and B. That special circumstances were not created by the owner or applicant;* andw�,, C. That the authorizing of the variance is necessary for the preservat'onif and enjoyment of substantial property rights; and NA!...44.4kA wtf',p_40.t4. D. That any variance granted imposes such conditions as will assure that the authorizing of the adjustment shall not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which such property is located; and Report to the BOA OV10-92-3 page 2 E. That the authorizing of the variance will not be materially detrimental to persons residing in the vicinity, to adjacent property, to the neighborhood or the public welfare in general. In this case, Staff feels that the hardship imposed on the builders of Lot 99 were imposed by Town Staff. The intent of requiring a 5 foot minimum side yard setback on residential lots in Neighborhood 7 is to maintain a minimum of 10 feet between structures from lot to lot. In this particular case, the house on Lot 98 is located 12 feet from its north property line, which abuts Lot 99. The additional 3 feet of setback between that common property line and the house on Lot 99 results in a total of 15 feet between the two houses. We, therefore, feel that the intent of the required setbacks in Neighborhood 7 have been met in this case. Attachments: 1. Application for variance 2. Copy of approved building permit and site plan for Lot 99 APPLICATION NO. OV �O Cl ✓ REQUEST FOR VARIANCE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 1. APPLICANT'S NAME - 4-Mt _ 2 . ADDRESS gel() , . Zde g 7/(o 3 . TELEPHONE NUMBER gSg - d nQ/ 4 . PROPERTY OWNER ADDRESS TELEPHONE NUMBER cvrr e_ 5. ADDRESS OR LEGAL '-1? /4Lf�JJi(, ()Cyry/Y) DESCRIPTION OF /� SUBJECT PROPERTY /"'� 0-Y)I by I's 1ost? iL4' c 17bp gj d 7 2i,f I LOT NO. 99 LOT SIZE ACRES ZONED 6. WHAT PROVISION OF gv P sTHE ORO VALLEY ZONING f A4cia roi CODE REVISED ARE YOU REQUESTING A VARIANCE /1,Q lh e d k 7. STATE BRIEFLY AND FULLY THE REASONS WHY THE VARIANCE IS DEEMED NECESSARY: 1't 13,,,y A ey) es Jo/ h d a_ deuhit.,(:a I fry tit- .'t-t 7 1- s.e I '4-14,i.,,4�. Si 10 •/Ic ✓ d u J1..d / t)1 t `u i Lek,On6 I✓e//z / 7Z/i emu// &4 /�, �.c�i�'h v S. caw d a,. 3' irrt.�.�-�.�-r�.r r�-� nr� Ptfru.fi.c kpd-plA 1J' -�- y�� / sic/A sic/AeAr. .c_ /3,�6 ,,1* a i7.7 4.J ',H Ord"o auc 1 h a,J 0- Met'k. / A/lam /5' h.c 4 � hn2vuy he7,04. 1/7G' AMY? /�fU14/G �}J Yr7�Nii ?u' tIl� �'Id �t �l ./1 'L4. t rCcL L4 cr c�/ ,'i' 15 4'vn .. O 4 v r/a//c y �� /�7�7N a.vrswns hA,ve_ t-r vrwat, a-nd /J 5 Ptef 4L c/1 n j f./L75 7 f?c.%iJ l`G' 44 1G�7 h,S /IZ!LtJ A6YYtL �(� ,„ /o '6. 'I. /(I -1- 8. IS A REZONING OR A SUBDIVISION PLAT INVOLVED IN THIS REQUEST? YES ( ) NO ()c) 9. HAS A PREVIOUS APPLICATION BEEN FILED OR A HEARING HELD RESPECTING THE SUBJECT PREMISES? YES ( ) NO ( X) 10. PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING: ( t ) DIMENSION PLOT PLAN, COPIES. (q/9c DIMENSIONED FLOOR PLAN, COPIES. DIMENSIONED ELEVATION PLAN, COPIES. ( ) AN ESTIMATE OF THE INCREMENTAL COST OF THE CHANGE IN OR ADDITIONS TO THE PROPERTY, SUCH ESTIMATED COST TO BE ENDORSED AS ACCURATE BY A LICENSED CONTRACTOR OR ENGINEER. ( ) NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL OWNERS OF PROPERTY, ANY PART OF WHICH IS WITHIN 300 FEET OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Received by on , 1991 . All requirements satisfied on , 1991 . Fee $ paid by check no. Applicant was given Schedule of Fees & applicable rules on -2- .1PLLEY 'IRS QO 0 0 2 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA 85737 A A °UNDEO A91� April 22, 1992 Steve Craddock U. S. Home Corporation 800 E. Wetmore, suite 210 Tucson, Arizona RE: Lot 99, Rancho Vistaso Neighborhood 7 Dear Mr. Craddock, This letter is to confirm our telephone conversation this week regarding the status of lot 99 at RV Neighborhood 7. As we discussed, the house under construction on lot 99 encroaches on the south five foot side yard by approximately two feet. The property owner on lot 98 brought this to our attention. As you know, the Town has placed a stop work order on further construction until this setback discrepancy is resolved. The Town's position is that U.S.Home must either make the house on lot 99 comply with the five foot side yard requirement or request a variance to this requirement from the Town's Board of Adjustment. You indicated that you would prefer to seek a variance. Accordingly, we have begun this process. Tammy fL um your office filed an application to the BOA yesterday afternoon and my office has begun obtaining the list of property owners within 300' of lot 99 required for public hearing. The meeting date will probably be either May 11 or 12. I will keep you posted on this process. If you have any questions prior the BOA hearing, please call me. Sincerely, Steve Hagedorn Planning and Zoning Director SWH/swh Administrative Offices(602)297-2591 FAX(602)297-0428 Building Codes, Engineering,Planning&Zoning Department(602)797-9797 Magistrate Court(602)297-3205 Office of the Town Attorney(602)297-5222 CATHY HUFAULT, Mayor CHERYL SKALSKY,Vice-Mayor LANETTA LEE ELLIOTT.Councilmember KENNETH N. KAROL,Councilmember STEPHEN E. RENNECKAR.Councilmember - Town of Oro Valley Building Permit Permit No. 4 5 8 I Job Address Lot No. APA No. 12491 N. Granville Canyon 99 Subdivision Parcel No. Bk_ Pg. Rancho Vistoso Applicant Mailing Address Zip code Phone US Home 5501 N. Swan #100 95718 577-8855 Owner Mailing Address Zip code Phone Sa1.te • Contractor Mailing Address Phone License I Same Architect.Engineer or Designer Mailing Address Zip code Phone Describe Work :;-angle Family Residence - Plan 3477 w/ 3-car garage, workshop, powder, deck A State Valuation of New Work Special Conditions • This permit becomes null and void if work or construction authorized TYPE OF PERMIT CASH is not commenced within 180 days or if construction or work is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days at any time after work is commenced. It is the authorized applicant's responsibility to Permit Fee $ 1 ,41,.5.7 7 determine the location of all existing underground utilities, sewage disposal systems or other obstacles that may interfere with the APA Charge $ : . ' construction or work authorized by this permit I hereby certify that I have read and examined this permit and know the same to be true and correct All provisions of laws and ordinances governing this type of work will be complied with whether specified herein or not. The granting of a permit does not presume to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of any other state or $ local law regulating construction or the performance of construction. $ Use Zone Occupancy Group Type of Construction $ Fire Zone Bldg.Size(S.F.) No.of Stories $ No.of Dwelling Units Max.Occ.Load Fire Sprinklers Req'd Service Charge $ Yes No Off Street Parking Spaces Covered Uncovered TOTAL FEES > $ = , (.- • , / • - " Less Previous Payments(Plan Check Fee) $ Signature of Authorized Applicant Receipt No. Date ' -`�` TOTAL AMOUNT DUE ). $ (... . eginning WE WILL NEED THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION TO MAKE *.PAARt No. Balance . $ YOUR INSPECTIONS: 1. Permit No.-See upper right corner of this permit. Fees Charged(-) $ 2. Your Job Address and Type of Inspection you want-See your inspection Service Charge(-) $ card. 3. Your job address must be posted at front property line near road. Ending Balance $ ��su.�x'4.:'OP • + I��I j EXHIBIT NO. OV CASE NO. O Y I0—Qc9-- P&Z DRB TC Cia) H OVEX CASEIBIT NONO. oV(p-4a.5 P&Z DRB. TC BO GENERAL 'NOTES I. mess AREA OF. SUBDIVISION IS 131 .08 ACRES. 2. AREA OF NATURAL OPEN SPACE IS 35.88 ACRES. 3. AVERAGE LOT SIZE - 7,000 S:F. 4• MAXIMUM `LOT:.SIZE - 14,755 S.F. 5. -MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT - 30 FEET. 6. SETBACKS: P.A.D. FRONT 20 FEET, SIDE 5 FEET OR 0 FEET, REAR 10 FEET, 7. PARKING PROVISIONS: CARPORTS @ 2 EACH - 63 DRIVEWAYS @ 2 EACH - 4 TOTAL PROVIDED 634 1,268 8. EXISTING ZONING - P.A.D. ORO VALLEY. 9. NO FURTHER SUBDIVIDING WILL BE DONE WITHOUT OF ORO VALLEY MAYOR AND COUNCIL. THE WRITTEN APPROVAL 10. BEARINGS ARE BASED UPON ASSUMED BEARING OF "NORTH" LINE OF SECTION 1 , T-12-S, R-13-E. (N 00�00'00" ON THE EAST E) 1 t• PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF ASSURANCES THE PROFESSIONAL PNOVIDE CERTIFICATION THAT HIGHWAY'AND ,FLOOp ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL VIRTUE OF REZONING, CONTROL FACILITIES INSTALLED BY SUBDIVISION OR OTHER DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY HAVE BEEN IN- STALLED ACCORDING TO THE PLANS PREPARED BY THE CONSULTANT AND CERTIFIED' THE FORM, LINE AND FUNCTION OF ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE ROA - E AS TO STRUCTURES: DWAYS AND DRAINAGE 12. NUMBER OF- LOT : 317. 13. COMMON AREAS AS SHOWN. HE►'EON WILL BE FOR THE PRIVATE USE AND CONVENIENCE OF ALL OWNERS OF PROPERTY WITHIN THE RANCHO VISTOSO COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, THEIR GUESTS AND INVITEES. 14. COMMON AREAS AND PUBLIC SEWER AND UTILITY EASEMENTS HEREON ARE FOR THE INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE, REPAIR, USE AND REPLACEMENT OF CABLE TELEVISION FACILITIES, SEWERS, WATER, ELECTRIC AND TELEPHONE LINES, ABOVE GROUND ELECTRIC TRANSFORMERS AND PEDESTALS, TELEPHONE PEDESTALS AND UNDERGROUND FACILI TIES OTHER UTILITY LINES ANJ EZELATED FACILITIES. NO OVERHEAD LINES SHALL BE USED. 15. NATURAL OPEN' SPACE IS DEFINED IN THE RANCHO VISTOSO AREA PLAN A ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OR ORO VALLEY ON JULY 29, 1987. • APPROVALS I 1 v CLEW: OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALL:Y HEREBY CER IF TO L W A PROVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF DIE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY ON.THE . r 1 DAY OF ,: r • , 1987. tLERK, TOW T « DATE ORO .VALLEY , THIS -FINAL PLAT AS SUBMITTED SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THE TENTATIVE PLAT APPROVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL AND MEETS ALL ENGINEERING CONDITIONS AND REQUIRE- MENTS THE TOWN OF ORO/1VALLEY ZONING ORDINANCE. T % t ,,. . , ,-„,,, ,, :1 ?2,43 6'g 26.0 . .r tit o' :�'aa���'. Alir- Pi) 1 Gp,�o lop ...4101106111,1110 :-I-. ,ei (0\) .. 1 I P P'/ ri 0110 -3?-(011°611-41().C4,.:ir•,t .... , .., _ :.,Oligarill GOO o' �'-7 t \NC) r ' �, ..$ \� PPP 0. , O �:-A #3 4 • • a l`' R.Ci �,\O �,P " OF PN Cu 0 � .. a Q c.© LP 6 FAR o�P�0��\�Jt�� ��t�! o�P���� 0 ?? gc G - 0-. - O'� .`.� C0 P vol Q00\1 P 0 - tAsc. F� Ov\�,�0 I a+ • 1 L.._... 1+• _ _ _ . 6` PUBLIC •. d U1'IL. ESMI. _.__._ .__..._. .. ,N PED vi ,`'" ' N24'2 '4v v'E !i• TC 24.68 o co �. 11`C 6.18 • 0 w • —_--�•�••...���•.�a..-.�.y;`a}a M.Y.\KY.R4.'u'K MiY«--r•'•YiuvN r+�TK-lWM:'.n1M'J1:7r4N✓.-)M,YE^.nt.----...1<ti:"..T.�'+`ae�Z:Ll�.L'.w�lM'1:.L'r-:.axi4i—?•.r1a:-J:S-0.I::-14,1...,1.r'ti:li.:I_J.:-V:.'I.: EXHIBIT NO. w CASE NO. 0YI°V`� .-3 SEE ARCHITECTUAL PLANS FOR • P&Z DRB TC ( BOA ) BUILDING DIMENSIONS. -i ALL SITE IMPROVE'MENTB WILL BE COMPLETE PRIOR TO SALE OF HOUSE ance from Back of Curb to Prb ert • P X Line 7' LOT THIS PLOT PLAN IS FOR RLFERENOE NOT C ONLY AND DOES N , • 9 CONSTITUTE ss 1 N. CRANVIL.LE CANypN A SURVEY. • ODE • NONA1, zsstlF,, DATE 3.1 l A Q� 1� / Builder to verify • SUE DATE ........_...___...__ building separation for compliance .with local firc codes and material com. pliance U �O c; , � ,�, • V r�•07 S i ,2°° c b. V\ -(9 OS c9 m 4 m ,-- 0 t o ��Ko w sr t. �: �`r, r V l O ,60......kfifirni ._.n' .0}041) i �. f. �9 JCS �' • • S J o E rn ��0�� (� X �) n a� =�` ( ) I00• 0 olo 1� 4 2.7,,,G,, ... 4/ /,/ , XII ./ „ 5-7!c.32., , _ i, O �� .V II 1, 57 0 ) a n.)0Q0 ... (A)k ..., �e��/ /0 e 0 �N �r - 3 ! -1 I O 3 9 . - o S 7"? 1 ,, , 10 2 ,Yzn r�,0 `• ' t Oa gel • -. 8,S14 S o ry Z ul 8f O NI �65, O , �� .�j '.2- V 6 .A 1.V 321/Gi. 1 ,-511 is' 8 t-- o ,p [r' ( Q�3,Q li 1 8 N ; INo • Q • N� 7 /a32,I v -J SF p �1 0 2 0 08 :0' �•N\ In" Gs,,, 3 p' ! :S7 00 / a 1,91Z., N:-4.,,,,to� 55 d- d` . . 9 /II ( pc..^ ,, ,,,, 1 (-- & v li N''' . .-___. ,f - ,0 0 1 i \ V. 0 4 1 0° 4;e'''' '4.'•1:k'`. '' '''t.'?3/ ' '0 (I1 8 0 , , ' k , , II .1) ,,, ' . . ' i • Gc—___ ,0 8sr-' 0 -' �, ?S �� .� . _ 0 rI �� 4'1 ' 2`/ / , o)• l o. `��' ;. ,. 5 4 - ItJ G v' / +� In �N � u• �, z. / 14.0• a w,, r- rn U. / 90.E •so,,1 ZZ. Z' r- 99 0 0 O , Z 1€,, 11 I. ' 0 s\ 0 V- 0 �_ S83553'4.4"E 12�0.95` 1 C - tom. 112 7.4 40.0)° 8�. S S t 1 I �. /V ir. .� .t a "4•w O (V 8 ; ... b. (13- "'"?- 1147' ,..' 1 u ,9 (iyrip. 9 NG ° ' 1v 144 0 d,eo4. 5 N o, 225 J + ' 0,- 10,24.G O 1 Ln. (\i" 5 G80, ii g 0 31 • 1680 .<IG''''4".4.2'°4 ' . • PO A._-,.. I )`'33'-5r __S) ` • SC S -.......0,'o ‘ ' N 0 I S rR R ' 9 °O (\j Wi , 0:(1 8- �7S• _cv .. 3o` g S� th r- II] O <9 • : •3S. C2 T 121 . 64 �T� Nt 0 J11� S�30 5.... ` 2 J Q _ r'77 2 f L arzic). 18 ' - -1 t•�-,fn I O Cj . U • f-- -_t I, g,�j2S �QC\I 3 1OVi• : 1 .. N• 0 �- 0 3 l 1 w HI..° 0°' !Y 0 l/ _ 34" " N 0 8-3 6 51 '' 96 0 CR) 10,.o 76 cv r� 53 I J 3 p t(? © °Cr ° N b ,...;-1' t-: - ..' -qt 0 �' , _t a- ° If) O N ' r //,, - U v 57ESa 58'O5„1 op 4 0 fir' 'I � , v' I� �-cr V 0 _ , ko 2I � �02 �S • 3 •/ ,G`• $to � 3 • V 8 ° r(/ .-: @ .--. LI) r- It 1 _ o 0 4O SO 49 -4:A °O2'4 "E ' -md- 600 i•�. r CRC - _ ‘1' �:._ • 0 r 00 ?g '' o a , N 0r a r 0 $1 N F,' t ,'� d ♦/ ♦! 0 CJ"� 17 0 Go Q� al z,;,�;, c0 , A �� 0•� 23 2S S. 4 C,o C �SO•59 \3; 4 1 -0 \ c-) , y 4 (.j, ' < :1 ‘c.. SS14 -.- 0 o 0 oots_________,-;---c,s_.--- -,„„ -In : glQi 0 _ 1 h , , :, ,: , O r 'd —d0 a thl RIG __ r-n �� -.. - NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE ORO VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT In accordance with Section 1-505 of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised, NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE ORO VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT IS HEREBY GIVEN: TIME ▪ at or after 4 : 30 p.m. , Tuesday, May 12, 1992 PLACE : Oro Valley Town Hall Council Chambers, 11000 N. La Canada Drive, Oro Valley, Arizona SUBJECT ▪ REQUEST FOR VARIANCE TO SIDE YARD SETBACK, REDUCE THE SETBACK FROM THE REQUIRED 5 FEET TO APPROXIMATELY 3 FEET. LOCATION : 12491 N. Grandville Canyon, Lot 99 , Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood #7 Members of the public are invited to attend this meeting and will be given an opportunity to speak. (Plans can be viewed in the office of the Deputy Clerk. ) Steve Hagedorn Planning and Zoning Director Town of Oro Valley PUB: The Daily Territorial April 24, 1992 REQ: Steve Hagedorn, Planning & Zoning Director I APPROVE THE REQUEST FOR VARIANCE TO SIDE YARD SETBACK, FROM THE REQUIRED 5 FEET TO APPROXIMATELY 3 FEET. I DISAPPROVE THE REQUEST FOR VARIANCE TO SIDE YARD SETBACK, FROM THE REQUIRED 5 FEET TO APPROXIMATELY 3 FEET. NAME: /22/�� ci e E 0 ADDRESS: , PHONE: � / EXHIBIT NO. OV CASE NO. COY 0-9, - P&Z DRB TC CBOA) I APPROVE THE REQUEST FOR VARIANCE TO SIDE YARD SETBACK, FROM THE REQUIRED 5 FEET TO APPROXIMATELY 3 FEET. I DISAPPROVE THE REQUEST FOR VARIANCE TO SIDE YARD SETBACK, FROM THE REQUIRED 5 FEET TO APPROXIMATELY 3 FEET. NAME. 'ci% 6--4-0L.1 ADDRESS: / — ( , PHONE: 2 !cLI 112 ekrj 7 7 I APPROVE THE REQUEST FOR VIIRIFlNCE TO SIDE YARD SETBACK, FROM THE REQUIRED 5 FEET TO APPROXIP1AT[LY 3 FEET. �1 I DISAPPROVE THE REQUEST FOR VARIANCE TO SIDE YARD SETBACK, FROM THE REQUIRED 5 FEET TO APPROXIMATELY 3 FEET. NAME: 12)e4,p6 �dL�'✓d''J ADDRESS: /?- I APPROVE THE REQUEST FOR VARIANCE TO SIDE YARD SETBACK, FROM THE REQUIRED 5 FEET TO APPROXIMATELY 3 FEET. I DISAPPROVE THE REQUEST FOR VARIANCE TO SIDE YARD SETBACK, FROM THE REQUIRED 5 FEET TO APPROXIMATELY 3 FEET. NAME: ADDRESS: I APPROVE THE REQUEST FOR VARI/1NCE TO SIDE YARD SETBACK, FROM THE REQUIRED 5 FEET TO APPROXIM/1TELY 3 FEET. /:›c:/ I DISAPPROVE THE REQUEST FOR VARIANCE TO SIDE YARD SETBACK, FROM THE REQUIRED 5 FEET TO 11PPROXIMATELY 3 FEET. NAME: — D d,C) ADDRESS: / I APPROVE THE REQUEST FOR VARIANCE TO SIDE YARD SETBACK, FROM THE REQUIRED 5 FEET TO APPROXIMATELY 3 FEET. I DISAPPROVE THE REQUEST FOR VARIANCE TO SIDE YARD SETBACK, FROM THE REQUIRED 5 FEET TO APPROXIMATELY 3 FEET. NAME: .2:0-44,z-' ADDRESS: I APPROVE THE REQUEST FOR VARIANCE TO SIDE YARD SETBACK, FROM THE REQUIRED 5 FEET TO APPROXIMATELY 3 FEET. I DISAPPROVE THE REQUEST FOR VARIANCE TO SIDE YARD SETBACK, FROM THE REQUIRED 5 FEET TO APPROXIMATELY 3 FEET. NAME: & 6//6//9 (;?eN;AS ADDRESS: / _, dufri./ . ,a/4.L I APPROVE THE REQUEST FOR VARIANCE TO SIDE YARD SETBACK, FROM THE REQUIRED 5 FEET TO APPROXIPIATELY 3 FELT. I DISAPPROVE THE REQUEST FOR VARIANCE TO SIDE YARD SETBACK, FROM THE REQUIRED 5 FEET TO IIPPROXIM/1TELY 3 FEET. var cp S4co1(I) kaue Ian so10-- 6-6-€ icar-111 , NAME: 30flocuo r(glut) ADDRESS: -- I APPROVE THE REQUEST FOR VARIANCE TO SIDE YARD SETBACK, FROM THE REQUIRED 5 FEET TO APPROXIMATELY 3 FEET. ✓ I DISAPPROVE THE REQUEST FOR VARIANCE TO SIDE YARD SETBACK, FROM THE REQUIRED 5 FEET TO APPROXIMATELY 3 FEET. NAME: i 41A ADDRESS: I APPROVE THE REQUEST FOR VARIANCE TO SIDE YARD SETBACK, FROM THE REQUIRED 5 FEET TO APPROXIMATELY 3 FEET. I DISAPPROVE THE REQUEST FOR VARIANCE TO SIDE YARD SETBACK, FROM THE REQUIRED 5 FEET TO APPROXIMATELY 3 FEET. NAME: ADDRESS: I APPROVE THE REQUEST FOR VARIANCE TO SIDE YARD SETBACK, FROM THE REQUIRED 5 FEET TO APPROXIMATELY 3 FEET. �,' I DISAPPROVE THE REQUEST FOR VARIANCE TO SIDE YARD SETBACK, FROM THE REQUIRED 5 FEET TO APPROXIMATELY 3 FEET. NAME: ADDRESS: '({ \ I APPROVE THE REQUEST FOR UFlRIANCE TO SIDE YARD SETBACK, FROM THE REQUIRED 5 FEET TO APPROXIMNTELY j 3 FEET. i V I DISIIPPROUF. THE REQUEST FOR VARIANCE TO SIDE YARD SETBACK, FROM THE REQUIRED 5 FEET TO APPROXIMATELY 3 FEET. NAME: ,,,z4/55Y ADDRESS: //, I APPROVE THE REQUEST FOR VARIANCE TO SIDE YARD SETBACK, FROM THE REQUIRED 5 FEET TO APPROXIMATELY 3 FEET. XI DISAPPROVE THE REQUEST FOR VARIANCE TO SIDE YARD SETBACK, FROM THE REQUIRED 5 FEET TO APPROXIMATELY 3 FEET. NAME: _(1 n i 5 61 Q e_ ADDRESS: / _ •/ I APPROVE THE REQUEST FOR VFlRIANCE TO SIDE YARD SETBACK, FROM THE REQUIRED 5 FEET TO APPROXIMATELY 3 FEET. I DISAPPROVE THE REQUEST FOR VARIANCE TO SIDE YARD SETBACK, FROM THE REQUIRED 5 FEET TO APPROXIM/\TELY 3 FEET. NAME: fitj(17\ae /), ad.,. ADDRESS: () � • 'Mt t. I /27,, - • IIIH ;i EXHIBIT NO. k0 OV CASE NO. '�V►n-��"3 P&Z DRB TC BOA 111111111° • l_illi IMMO ill, ri 9 MI[ . . : , y •i Wir ,,, ,pr.,-------, V ,, i Y� EXHIBIT NO. OV CASE NO. 10-94- P&Z DRB TC �A0 p I S n ( pk o XHIBIT NO. OV CASE NO. IO-g,) 3 P&Z DRB TC BOA 303 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE therewith onform the requ ents f :.cifications and other data filed c and that�he fees specif ied�n and other pertinent laws and ordinances, 04 have been paid,he shall issue a permit therefor to the applicant. the building official issues the permit rn'ilns s are required,'APPROVEDhe Such shall n writing or stamp the plans andspecifications plans and specifications shall not be changed, modified or altered uthorizations from the building official,and all work regulated by this 1 be done in accordance with the approved plans. iilding official may issue a sans andmit for the spec specifications n for therwhole z t of a or structure before the entire p )r structure have been submitted e or filed complying provided with all perriadequate nent for- id detailed statements have b ;nts of this code.The holder of such building oreed at sa uct hire will s own Abe sk ssurance that the permit for the entire ention of Plans.One set of approved plans,specifications and compu- all be retained by the building official therein;and one riod of �et of approvt less than ed date of completion of the worklicant, and said set shall be specifications shall be returned to the app le site of the building or work at all times during which the work I thereby is in progress. (c)Validity of Permit. The issuance or granting of a permit or approval of plans,specifications and computations shall �hell not be nof hiscode or of any oto be a permit rther ,or an approval of,any violation of any ofprovisions ordinance of the jurisdiction. Permits presuming ordinances to gof the juive hri diction shall not �/ ority to violate or ' cancel the provisions of this code or other I be valid. 11 The issuance of a permit based upon plans,specifications the acnd drother atofesrors not prevent the building official from thereafter requiring ra- in said plans,specifications and other hen to violation ofrthisnc�ode orng 'oflng any other bons being carried on thereunder ordinances of this jurisdiction. (d)Expiration.Every permit issued by the andding becomer void the provi- f the sions of this code shall expire by limitation ,,.,y, iwa.kti, {,,a, building or work authorized by such Permit is not ildin or work authorized within 180 days d by such permit -k`, "' *'s •.' from the date of such permit,or if the building yx r r� s: „{ is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is new commenced permi f oral period of IF' ,r ',,4,';`;' ` gg ' `"`` 180 days. Before such work can be recommenced, z `�. '`? . k.- obtained to do so,and the fee therefor shall be one half the amount required for a rst ' ' for such work;and provided further that such lixi",� �� ,� .� ��� ��; ¢,-- .� ; �,. new permit for such workprovided no changes have been made or will be made in "`F '±' "' •r 'i J ' ` ' K' "" ` t the original plans and specifications ,;,' 1,f t p,. ; b i}r` suspension or abandonment has not exceeded one year.In order to renew action on ny, 3 ' ��n • Y r a permit after expiration,the permittee shall pay a new full permit fee. nsion of the w , x applyfor an extension,t i#', `'f , �,, - � '.„ Any permittee holding an unexpired permit may ,a ti ; , +,,e. ,,:„ 1 time within which he may commence work under that permit when he is unable to wy '', 4 "rat Z 2.:: 10 .n T J .0 w x it r ° M � v ' i'3 'C',, .9'S-! '-+ 44 �fe,'SYV a v c 4'," :: 7,wta r 4 x t ,,V .. ,F "�a t ` r}+e ,. 4_V «-., h p - �' � x� ' 'S` ,�' '' ',,,'�,§ �a_ ',4 �. .EXHIBIT NO. - .4i:':::`,"L7C 4 4,-.oil!' ,,,,, i, �, , OV CASE NO. C��( v F P&Z DRB TC (B--0-1_,D AGENDA ORO VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT REGULAR SESSION MAY 12, 1992 STUDY SESSION: All items listed on the agenda may be discussed during the study session. CALL TO ORDER: 4 : 30 p.m. REGULAR SESSION: CALL TO ORDER: At or after 4 : 30 p.m. ROLL CALL 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - APRIL 29, 1992 2 . PUBLIC HEARING OV10-92-3 - U.S. HOME REQUEST FOR VARIANCE TO SIDE YARD SETBACK, REDUCE THE SETBACK FROM THE REQUIRED 5 FEET TO APPROXIMATELY 3 FEET, RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 7, UNIT 1, LOT 99 ADJOURNMENT POSTED: 5/04/92 9:55 a.m. jad