Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOV131207 ' 4"."1") Greg MI che11 architect 1360 South Concordia • Republic,MO 6S738 417.619.4550 ■ gemcreations@sbcg/oba/.net June 26, 2012 Town of Oro Valley Building Safety Division 11000 North La Canada Drive Oro Valley, AZ 85737 RE: Permit No. C1200020 Dave Willett: Please find the responses/ clarifications to the plan review comments for the above referenced project. Responses are as follows: Dave Willett Building Plan Review (520.229.4803) Architectural Comments: Sheet A0.0: Comment 1 Plan sheets D1.1, SP1.1- SP1.3, M2.1, and Electrical sheets are missing from the plan sets. Please resubmit complete plan sets and coordinate the sheet numbers with the Drawing Index, see electrical sheet E3.1; check all. Response Owner to submit all drawings accordingly. Sheet A1.1: Comment 2 Please provide and accessible route onto the platform in accordance with 2006 IBC section 1103.1. 6/12/12 the ramp to the platform 112 and at the side door into the existing Fellowship area 109 are required to have handrails on both sides of the ramp if the elevation difference is greater than 6" in accordance with 2006 IBC 1010.8. The Ramp detail 5D/A1.1 shows 7" maximum elevation difference and 1D/A5.2 shows 7" maximum elevation difference. Please revise the maximum height to 6" or provide handrails as required. Handrails are required on both sides of the stair at the door into the Fellowship area in accordance with 2006 IBC 1009.10. Response All ramp elevations to be 6" maximum to permit handrail on one side only. See addendum #2, dated 06.26.12. Sheet A5.1: Comment 3 Please provide manufacture's specifications and ICC Evaluation Report number for the termination of the cultured stone veneer and stucco system in regards to any required flashing, weep screed, termination distance above pavement or comply with 2006 IBC section 2512.1.2, (see detail 1 D/A5.1). 6/12/12 this comment does not appear to be addressed regarding the termination of the stone veneer at the base of the wall. Please provide manufactures specifications and or demonstrate code compliance in accordance with 2006 IBC section 1403.2. Response Provided manufacturer's specifications/ ICC Evaluation reports accordingly. See addendum #2, dated 06.26.12. Structural Comments: Page 1 of 3 Comment 4 . Please provide structural documentation that the existing concrete floor is adequate to support the mezzanine in compliance with 2006 IBC chapter 16. 6/12/12 this comment does not appear to be addressed. There is no response to this comment or calculations submitted by the registrant's. Please provide structural calculations to demonstrate that the existing concrete floor is adequate to support the mezzanine. Response See note G4, sheet A1.1. Existing concrete floor is adequate to support mezzanine. Mechanical Comments: Sheet M1.1. Comment 5 Please verify the occupant load calculated for the outside air in the Sanctuary to be in accordance with 2006 IMC table 403.3. Please provide outside air calculations in compliance with 2006 IMC section 403.3.2 and table 403.3 or in accordance with ASHRAE 62.1-2004 as adopted by the Town of Oro Valley for the Sanctuary, Foyer and Office. 6/12/12 please provide a CO2 detector interconnected to all HVAC units with a damper in the outside air duct to be able to provide the code required amount of outside air in the event the"anticipated"occupancy and use time frame is exceeded (see OSA note #2 on M1.1) or provide"statistical data" (per 2006 IMC 403.3 exception) for the alternate anticipated occupant density for review and approval by the Town of Oro Valley Building Official. Response Coordinated occupant load and outside air calculations accordingly and added CO2 sensors as required. See addendum #2, dated 06.26.12. Comment 6 Please refer to the Town of Oro Valley Zoning comment letter comment #1 regarding coordinating location and screening HVAC units. Response Mechanical units/screening indicated in the same location accordingly. See addendum #2, dated 06.26.12. Patty Hayes Zoning Plan Review(520.229.4819) Comment 1 Sheet A0.0: The three new mechanical units added with this permit have been moved to the front (west) of the building as shown on the elevation and site plan. Originally the units were on the side (north) of the building as still shown on the electrical and mechanical sheets. Please show the units and their screening in the same location on all related sheets. Response Mechanical units/screening indicated in the same location accordingly. See addendum #2, dated 06.26.12. Comment 2 Final zoning approval of the elevations pending Planning's review and approval. Response No response required. Chris Kiel Fire Code Review (520.825.5968) Comment 1 Address the outstanding egress items noted on the Oro Valley Building Safety review in accordance with IFC Chapter 10. Response No response required. Rosevelt Arellano Planning(520.229.4817) Page 2 of 3 Comment 1 A formal submittal is required for the proposed Final Architecture. Based on your recent submittal, staff offers the following comments in order to assist you in preparing this formal submittal. Please note that these comments are preliminary in nature and should not be considered an exhaustive review. Response Owner has noted this requirement. Comment 2 Please provide color renderings of all buildings elevations depicting the overall building composition and façade design elements. Response Included and submitted as part of addendum #2. See addendum#2, dated 06.26.12. Comment 3 Provide a colored elevation of the rooftop showing how all mechanical equipments will be screened. Response Existing rooftop units to remain. No new units will be placed on the roof. All new units have been placed on ground and screened accordingly. See addendum #2, dated 06.26.12. Comment 4 Please provide a color band along the roofline that would allow the offset feature to appear more prominent. Response A color band along roof line has been added. See addendum #2, dated 06.26.12. Comment 5 Is there an architectural feature (sign pole) located between the proposed mechanical screen equipment and new metal roof canopy? Please address and/or revised accordingly. Response The element shown is an existing downspout. No response required. Comment 6 Please submit five (5) copies on 11"x 17" paper along with an application fee of$270 for a formal submittal. Response Owner has noted this requirement and will submit accordingly. Should there be any questions or concerns regarding the above responses, please do not hesitate to call- 1.417.619.4550. Respectfully Submitted, Greg E. M(tchell, A chitect Cc: File Alfred King, Pastor, North Valley Baptist Church Tim Hamilton, Pond Creek Designs Page 3 of 3 Greg Michell architect 136o South Concordia • Republic,MO 65738 417-619-45So • gemcreations@sbcglobal.net ADDENDUM Proposed Infill (Phase II) for: Project Title: North Valley Baptist Church Addendum Number: Two ctlIU Project Number: GEM-048.1 Contract Documents • ,CA ('4 Issue Date: 04.11.12 4 40805 '• GREGORY' • i• EUGENE Containing: Pages: 63 (total) MITCHELL 10 (24 X 36) architectural/mep ,I Drawings: 5 (11 X 17)/ 1 (8.5 X 11) • ` � ,�lf.,j S ecifications/ 18 (8.5 X 11 r P ) •,..- �,��;��''` ESR Reports: 25 (8.5 X 11) 06.V4•1Z THIS ADDENDUM AMENDS THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS OF THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT AND IS HEREBY INCORPORATED INTO THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AS PART THEREOF. General • Added specifications/ESR report information for synthetic stone veneer/synthetic stucco (as noted on drawings). See attached specifications/ESR reports. • Added color renderings of exterior elevations depicting overall building composition and accents (4 pages, 11 x 17). • Added roof plan rendering conveying existing and proposed screening (1 page, 11 x 17). Sheet A0.0 • Reference attached specifications/ESR report information for synthetic stone veneer/synthetic stucco (as noted on drawings). Sheet A1.1 • All ramp elevations shall not exceed 6". Sheet A5.1 • Revise base detail 1 D/A5.1 for synthetic stone veneer. Reference attached specifications/ESR report information for synthetic stone veneer. Sheet A5.2 • All ramp elevations shall not exceed 6". Sheet A7.1 • All ramp elevations shall not exceed 6". Page 1 of 2 • Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing Drawings • Revised/added/clarified information requested by City of Oro Valley Plan Review, 2nd submittal. See attached clarification information, dated 06.26.12,from Pond Creek Designs. END OF ADDENDUM Page 2 of 2 0 IP 0 41111k •nnat E '' 11 )00 xx'ii Illtv-' d e s . 1 9 n s —'.. } i., 'il,,TON La • R vk ,' 4 -... 3858 South State Highway PP Republic, MO 65738 v . z. Phone#(417) 732-2845 lie4ZON .---„,, - timham@pcdengineers.com Traismittai To: Greg Mitchell From: Tim Hamilton, P.E. Company: Greg Mitchell Architect Pages: - Fax #: Date: June 20, 2012 Re: North Valley Baptist Church — CC: Plan Review Comments El Urgent 0 For Review 0 Please Comment 0 Please Reply 0 Please Recycle • Comments: Attached are the responses to the plan review for the above referenced project. Sheet M1.1. 5) Please verify the occupant load calculated for the outside air in the Sanctuary to be in accordance with 2006 IMC table 403.3. Please provide outside air calculations in compliance with 2006 IMC section 403.3.2 and table 403.3 or in accordance with ASHRAE 62.1-2004 as adopted by the Town of Oro Valley for the Sanctuary, Foyer and Office. 6/12/12 please provide a CO2 detector interconnected to all HVAC units with a damper in the cutside air duct to be able to provide the code required amount of in „ II outside air the event the anticipated occupancy and use time frame is exceeded (see OSA note #2 on M1.1) or provide"statistical data" (per 2006.IMC 403.3 exception) for the alternate anticipated occupant density for review and approval by the Town of Oro Valley Building Official. Response: Reference Revised Sheets M1.1 and M1.2 where CO2 sensors were added and the outside air requirements were modified to the plan reviewers interpretation. Additionally, the condensing unit locations have been coordinated with the architectural screening, Reference Sheet M1.1 • 0Q0� �1EY AAi�0217 PI%kr Ato%14) Tr •� ,cDUNDED DEV REVIEW BOARD COMMERCIAL Resubmittal? N Development Review Transmittal Town of Oro Valley Development Infrastructure Services 11000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley,AZ 85737 Review Agency: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Transmittal Out: Friday, June 29, 2012 Transmittal Due: Friday,July 13, 2012 Project Information APPLIED Project Number: OV1312-07 Parcel Number: Project Title:• ARCHITECTURE REVIEW- FACADE CHANGES Lots (if applies): • Location: 0 Applicant: KING ALFRED Phone: 520-579-9608 Zoning: Oro Valley Planner: ROSEVELT ARELLANO Date Information (as applies) DRB Hearing: • 2nd DRB Hearing: Additional Comments: Written comments need to be returned to a Permit Technician. If you have no comments,please sign and date this form, and return it via FAX(520) 742-1022. For questions or comments, call (520) 229-4800 or email sgay@orovalleyaz.gov, cbaker@orovalleyaz.gov or wvicens@orovalleyaz.gov. Friday,June 29,2012 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Approved Without Comments By: Date: ��U�p,'.,\.Ey il�,, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY DEVELOPMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES DEPARMENT 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE, ORO VALLEY, AZ. 85737 PHONE: (520) 229-4800 FAX: (520) 742-1022 —_.:� www.orovalleydis.com =tea^ ., .t..:,:.m...�w.u�� �rw 1.1 FINAL DESIGN REVIEW Office Use Only LCase # f APPLICATION FORM ?012 � �� a JUN2 .�Q 1 Application Type: ❑ Full CDRB Final Site Package ❑ Final Public Artwork u Final Site Plan ❑ Revised Development Plan 7 'final Architecture— Commercial ❑ Revised Preliminary Plat u Final Architecture— Model Home ❑ Final Plat Name of Project: Applicant Information: * If more than one, attach list Applicant *: Property Owner(s) if different from Applicant*: Name: WA ,`1 . Name: .111.? lat-- oitf --,,..- Firm: �I�t" (i _ Firm: Address: 7/ / i . ..e$ Address: City:l,% State "C-4-Zip: gicS;1�� City: State: Zip: Telephone: W,"964Fax: Telephone: Fax: Email: 6 D _ . Email: At �1 ' (,, ,Consultant. (Discipline) Consultant: (Discipline) Name: Name: Firm: i Firm: Address: /36a$dt 41t' c)'1X '4 Address: �• p 6e JS City: State: Zip: /®I�YxCG State: Zip: �7 Telephone:[( !r4,��-gSs4ax: Telephone: Fax: Email: (ite/geFte4An 5JC f4I t1 4Lfr Email: Consultant: (Discipline) Consultant: (Discipline) Name: Name: Firm: Firm: Address: Address: City: State: Zip: City: State: Zip: Telephone: Fax: Telephone: Fax: Email: Email: Subject Property Information: Address: 10 - � )�� �- Parcel/Tax Code: Subdivision / Commercial Center Name: Book/Page or Sequence Number: Lot Number(s) Legal Description: Section/Township/Range: Area of Property: Existing Land Use: Proposed Land Use: Project Description/Narrative: "11)-NcNroC CLCCAm c__\--cii,r\c2 • I hereby certify that I have read and examined this application and know the same to be true and correct. I am the owner of the property or the Owner's authorized representative, and if not the owner, I have obtained the owner's permission to perform stated work. All provisions of laws and ordinances governing this type of work will be complied with whether specified herein or not.The approval of this application does not presume to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of any other federal,state or local law for which this project may be subject to. Notice: It is the applicant/owner's responsibility to ensure all rules and regulations are adhered to. Applicants should contact their ome Owners Asso ' n, property management, and appropriate outside agencies. • // 1 a Applicant's Signatur Print Name Date Note all submi Is are dbe by 4:00 p.m. or it will be processed the next day. Submittals will be rejected if: • Not folded using Pima County fold &collated; • There are missing items on the checklist unless otherwise approved by Planning Division Manager or Town Engineer. • Re-submittals cannot be accepted without a transmittal and a written narrative summary describing the purpose of submittal. Project Conformance office use Only Existing Zoning: Existing General Plan Designation: Overlay District: --- Proposed Use in Conformance with Zoning: ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A Proposed Use in Conformance with General Plan Designation: ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A Previous Applications Relating to this Property: GP Amendment(s): Public Art Rezoning(s): Signs Conditional Use Permit(s): Communication Facilities Board of Adjustment Cases Pre-Application Case(s) Plat/Development Plan(s): Architecture Case(s): \IPI LEY. ,<' OO �y , � 3.0 ORO VALLEY FINAL ARCHITECTURAL PLAN CONTENTS /UUNDED A41' Review of project architecture is in two stages: • Conceptual Architectural Design • Final Architectural Design The Final Architectural Plan is one of three primary elements of the Final Design Review submittal. It is required element for all non-residential projects, as well as subdivision model homes and custom home projects, as specified in the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised. Final public architecture is administratively reviewed and approved by Planning Division staff. 3.1 Plan Format: Submittals must include printouts on paper no larger than 11"x17". All submittals must be folded to 8 1/2" X 11" and collated. Also, an electronic version of all submittal materials in PDF format is required. 3.2 Plan Content: Submit copies of the following (except as indicated): (2 copies) Response letter that notes how each Town Council Condition of Approval has been met o, ='` Color renderings of all buildings, structures, and elevations clearly depicting overall building composition and façade design elements (11" x 17") Final color and materials palette for all elevations of all principal and accessory structures and site walls; include roof material, accents, wainscot, etc. Photographs of proposed building materials should be provided, rather than actual materials (11" x 17") Color vignettes of: o Overall building composition o Entry building and other structures o Architectural features and façade design elements Building cross sections with floor elevation and heights, including roof, parapet, screening, and architectural features (black and white, 11" x 17") View of building rooftop that shows how mechanical equipment will be screened (color, 11" x 17") Site cross sections depicting overall topography in relation to neighboring property and existing grade line (black and white, 11" x 17") — Fe $270.00 eck payable to Town of Oro Valley. — CD of all submittal material in PDF format U.G _..X'Y\C 1 - C:\Documents and Settings\wvicens\Desktop\Planning Subweb 2012 Checklist\Final Guides and Forms\3.0 Public Architectural Plan Contents 3-16-12.doc 2012 Li r --- _ _.dldIIIIIIIIIIM"' -------- abk 411111111.0"-- ../ ___,....- __... -'41111 ,r., i f___ „ ,... \, 1 tj ,p i, SYTHETIC STUCCO(MATCH EXISTING). ACCENT COLOR AT JUN PREFINISHED METAL PARAPET T.O.PARAPET AROUND CAP.2 9 EXISTING BUILDING PERIMETER. (300 L.F. +/-,F.V.) SYTHETIC STUCCO(MATCH ' EXISTING). ACCENT COLOR. EXISTING MECH.SCREEN (STAIN) — — T.O. EXIST'G PARAPET 4 1 v ELEVATION 120'-8" 1 9 Iy SYTHETIC STUCCO(MATCH 1 # I EXISTING). FIELD COLOR. „.„..____ METAL AWNING TO MATCH NEW METAL ROOF OVER METAL ROOF. EXISTING CANOPY. 1111.- NEW METAL ROOF OVER \ - 1 , EXISTING CANOPY. r as I I i 0 SYTHETIC 1 ? '� •� 1 STUCCO i 1mum Om li. . _ I:I i I 5 I f MATCH , : . 11111 Nil a SYNTHETIC STONE EXISTING). 1 ,'� �� FIELD COLOR. fir !! VENEER. ..._:"&111177.1171 1 owl 1 I la...r- 'al 1 \ —_ - i aim— doom/ (\(1) SYNTHETIC STONE VENEER. MECHANICAL SCREEN ' ENCLOSURE. \ C l' 1 C 40805 * k • ctr NORTH ELEVATION EUCiENE LL Scale: N. T. S. iid/0;i _ ) 1 diA • -.-- ;-/AI''A aG.24,,2 Greg Mi1ljchell architect . 1 EXPIRATION DATE:06.30.2013 i� A ...... Ir,,......,... _ ... THIS SEAL IS FOR ARCHITECTURAL INFORMATION ONLY 1360 South Concordia • Republic,MO 65738 _ 417.6 ••4550 ■ gemcreations a@sbcglobal.net — _ Aillr / 1!9 I I I I I I I I III I 1 I I r"-"—-—-—-----. ,--- II SYTHETIC STUCCO EXISTING). ACCENT(MATCHR AT COLO T.O.PARAPET AROUND B PERIME T ER. (300 L.F. +/-,F.V.) _ _ SYTHETIC STUCCO(MATCH T.O. EXIST EXISTING 'GUILDING PARAPET ELEVATION 120'-8" EXISTING). ACCENT COLOR AT T.O.PARAPET AROUND EXISTING BUILDING PERIMETER. NEW METAL ROOF OVER (300 L.F. +/-,F.V.) 1 EXISTING CANOPY. i 1 a i 1 I; q I iall''' ,,, !I _ _.......................................----,—, . ! ' I ii r imm 2 ; ,... , i ,, SYNTHETIC STONE i VENEER. I SYTHETIC STUCCO(MATCH SYTHETIC STUCCO(MATCH EXISTING). FIELD COLOR. EXISTING). FIELD COLOR. l' C %FICA A . 40805 .. rls. c�ooRr � "E EAST ELEVATION , MITCHELL 1 I ' Scale: N. T. S. 1 iditto', 9 —� ) 1 ig*NQ.,'••1 11117i, Greg M ic hell ., - --iit0'' , OG.?.1�*l2 architect ,'1, EXPIRATION DATE:06.30.2013 �l THIS SEAL IS FOR ARCHITECTURAL INFORMATION ONLY 136o South Concordia • Republic,MO 65738 I, — —__ _ — , ______-_—...am....... — 417.6=550 • gerncreations@sbcglobal.net .... bal.net — -----momm1111111h6_,,w, ..41111111111111111111w— — illirp,4111111110.-- --.... , ,I PREFINISHED METAL PARAPET SYTHETIC STUCCO(MATCH CAP. EXISTING). ACCENT T 0 PARAPET AROUND COLOR AT SYTHETIC STUCCO(MATCH EXISTING). ACCENT COLOR. EXISTING BUILDING PERIMETER. (300 L.F. +/-,F.V.) T.O. EXISTS PARAPET 4 fI '' 'A — — ELEVATION 120'-8" it SYTHETIC STUCCO(MATCH EXISTING). FIELD COLOR. METAL AWNING TO MATCH METAL ROOF. • NEW METAL ROOF OVER EXISTING CANOPY. al O : SYNTHETIC STONE VENEER. li 1 So % I c , �cIC 4.. I - Qv P. I. GREGORY• SOUTH ELEVATION EUOENE, wt1TCNELL • ______.----1"....." M i N. T. S. l Scale: I .4,4 IIA1 -� (0.•, .111 , , ) 1 _- --..,4 , - ,,_, , Greg Mi chell O4.14.12 architect 'il EXPIRATION DATE:06.30.2013 '/ THIS SEAL IS FOR ARCHITECTURAL INFORMATION ONLY 1360 South Concordia • Republic,MO 65738 I _ 417.8•.550 • gemcreations a@sbcglobal.net � _ A ---_— — -� V —�..� — ���— _ i111 A I I PREFINISHED METAL PARAPET CAP. SYTHETIC STUCCO(MATCH EXISTING). ACCENT COLOR. *ELEVATION O. EXIST'G PARAPET _ 120'-8" T METAL AWNING TO MATCH / �� _. _ . �. _�. . �._ »..__ METAL ROOF. SYTHETIC STUCCO(MATCH ; EXISTING). FIELD COLOR. a �.. r titiii 1 II di � y � r 1 Eb � (,,,, ,., , , , . s. ,,,, ,, , ,,,,, „, ! '` 1 ai. kill tog Niat .3,, .i, .._ ,_,,,, , is , , , ,. t. $1 1 i o a IllIl ggg il — — - -ri, .,. _ _ I F• • NEW METAL ROOF OVER EXISTING CANOPY. SYNTHETIC STONE 1 tMECHANICAL SCREEN ENCLOSURE. SYNTHETIC STONE VENEER. i VENEER. ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM W/TINTED lk I1 GLAZING. o I 4 FICA I. • A'. GRE Y• t WEST ELEVATION ; MITCNELL N. T. S. dip o. . .,.',,0 L,III!,1,ifi'frt_tf Scale: 1tli ptA (Greg Mijche!I • 0G•24'(2 architect 1 \EXPIRATION DATE:06.30.2013 'i THIS SEAL IS FOR ARCHITECTURAL INFORMATION ONLY 136o South Concordia • Republic,MO 65738 417.6•.55o • gerncreations@sbcglobal.net r , 1. I t NEW METAL ROOF OVER - E EXISTING CANOPY. 1 i III 1 EXISTING ROOF TOP UNIT. k EXISTING MECH.SCREEN. (STAIN) 4 . el', GREGORY• I —•---- EXISTING ROOF TOP UNIT. EUGENE MITCHELL k 11 i • -•,..,.. , -„,,,,,,tei ii IP a ,,..Livir7i,„, . ,4 A l' MECHANICAL SCREEN NEW METAL ROOF OVER ENCLOSURE. (LOCATED EXISTING CANOPY. I ON GROUND). EXPIRATION DATE:06.30.2013 ,� _ _ THIS SEAL IS FOR ARCHITECTURAL INFORMATION ONLY ., � • { 0 I a I I METAL AWNING TO MATCH - 1 ,_,, I METAL ROOF. . ,_,..,...,..................0.11:0101 .Th 1 W:rrrr -ii - (GregMI che11 ' architect 1 ROOF PLAN J/ , Scale: N. T. S. ....__ �� I 1360 South Concordia • Republic,MO 65738 417.6 ••4550 • gemcreations a©sbcglobal.net �- A��� _—_ oPO JP�LEY Agi2oy9 Altit •45n, h tl 1f 4'00,0E0,9-a Development and Infrastructure Services July 11, 2012 Greg Mitchell Greg Mitchell Architect 1360 S. Concordia Republic, MO 65738 RE: 1st Review- Final Architecture for North Valley Baptist Church located on the southeast corner of 1st Avenue and Palisades Road,OV1312-07. Dear Greg, Thank you for submitting the Final Architecture for the above project. Based on your submittal, staff offers the following comments to be addressed in a second submittal: 1. Please change the building's primary color(polar white)to an earth tone color that is consistent with the natural environment on the basis of pigment, color value and/or intensity (per Section 2.2.E.1 and 2 of Addendum A, Design Standards, of the Oro Valley Zoning Code). The use of desert/mountain colors that blend with the natural background is encouraged. 2. Revise the colored building elevations to accurately reflect all proposed colors. 3. Please revise the proposed color palette as follows: a. Show only proposed colors. b. Identify the color of the rooftop and include the light reflectance value(LRV). c. Identify the color of the rooftop mechanical screening device and include the LRV being in accordance with Section 2.2.B.3.of Addendum A, Design Standards, of the Oro Valley Zoning Code. For a second submittal, please submit 3 copies with the above corrections on 11" x 17" sheets. If you have any questions,please contact me. Respectfully, XAQ.C9PA( Rosevelt Arellano Planner Cc: File David Laws, Permits Manager Permit Technicians Planning Permitting Inspection&Compliance Engineering Operations Transit (520)229-4821 (520)229-481 5 (520)229-4815 (520)229-4894 (520)229-5070 (520)229-4990 Caring for our heritage, our community, our future. 11000 N.La Canada Drive•Oro Valley,Arizona 85737 fax:(520)742-1022•www.orovallevDlS.com • , QO\lPLLEY 4,c4)1(,`„. 1 :WO °UNDED'\91 DEV REVIEW BOARD COMMERCIAL Resubmittal? Y Development Review Transmittal Town of Oro Valley Development Infrastructure Services 11000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley,AZ 85737 Review Agency: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Transmittal Out: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 Transmittal Due: Tuesday,July 31, 2012 Project Information APPLIED Project Number: OV1312-07 Parcel Number: Project Title: ARCHITECTURE REVIEW- FACADE CHANGES Lots (if applies): Location: 0 Applicant: KING ALFRED Phone: 520-579-9608 Zoning: Oro Valley Planner: ROSEVELT ARELLANO Date Information (as applies) DRB Hearing: 2nd DRB Hearing: Additional Comments: 2ND REVIEW 10 DAYS Written comments need to be returned to a Permit Technician. If you have no comments,please sign and date this form, and return it via FAX(520) 742-1022. For questions or comments, call (520) 229-4800 or email sgay@orovalleyaz.gov, cbaker@orovalleyaz.gov or wvicens@orovalleyaz.gov. Wednesday,July 18,2012 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Approved Without Comments By: Date: Greg Michell architect 1360 South Concordia • Republic,MO 65738 417.619.4550 • gemcreations@sbcglobal.net �llL ,J` July 18, 2012 Town of Oro Valley Development and Infrastructure Services 11000 North La Canada Drive Oro Valley,AZ 85737 RE: Permit No. C1200020 /OL) ) 0 Z_ ci Rosevelt Arellano: Please find the responses/ clarifications to the plan review comments for the above referenced project. Responses are as follows: Rosevelt Arellano Planning (520.229.4817) Comment 1 Please change the building's primary color (polar white)to an earth tone color that is consistent with the natural environment on the basis of pigment, color value and/or intensity(per Section 2.2.E.1 and 2 of Addendum A, Design Standards, of the Oro Valley Zoning Code). The use of desert/mountain colors that blend with the natural background is encouraged. Response Primary building color has been modified to TRAIL DUST DE6123 as manufactured by Dunn Edwards Paints and complies with the characteristics 'consistent with the natural environment'. Comment 2 Revise the colored building elevations to accurately reflect all proposed colors. Response Every attempt has been made to accurately reflect the colors proposed. Attached color palette and proposed material colors have been noted accordingly. Comment 3 Please revise the proposed color palette as follows: a. Show only proposed colors. b. Identify the color of the rooftop and include the light reflectance value (LRV). c. Identify the color of the rooftop mechanical screening device and include the LRV being in accordance with Section 2.2.B.3.of Addendum A, Design Standards, of the Oro Valley Zoning Code. Response Color palette has been revised as follows: a. Only the proposed colors have been indicated accordingly. b. Color of the existing rooftop membrane has been identified (assumed) and included the light reflectance value (LRV) accordingly(assumed). c. Color of the rooftop mechanical screening device has been clarified on the color palette as being painted and included the LRV accordingly. Page 1 of 2 Should there be any questions or concerns regarding the above responses, please do not hesitate to call— 1.417.619.4550. Respectfully Submitted, Greg E. M tchell,A chitect Re: Attachments (6- 11 x 17) Cc: File Alfred King, Pastor, North Valley Baptist Church Page 2 of 2 , co A JUL 1 8 201Z APPROV . :Y: Tc/PZ/DRB/BOA 14111W144. I P PROJE T MANAGER PREFINISHED METAL PARAPET CAP. SYTHETIC STUCCO(MATCH T.O. EXIST'G PARAPET EXISTING). ACCENT COLOR. ELEVATION 120'-8" METAL AWNING TO MATCH } METAL ROOF. SYTHETIC STUCCO(MATCH p, EXISTING). FIELD COLOR. p6 F s It I • :emit :15 • Ui ? 1 , ? ' .' p "' .� °�•_.,i 17: Yr. ‘7.' Vi: � p -- �� -- NEW METAL ROOF OVER EXISTING CANOPY. ..1'; SYNTHETIC STONE SYNTHETIC STONE MECHANICAL SCREEN VENEER. ENCLOSURE. VENEER. ALUMINUM STOREFR,NT SYSTEM W/TINTED GLAZING. -moo AA. ( at ICA 'AA cr WES T ELEVATION UC NE ELF A.A ) Scale: N. T. S. • also, Greg M i ch ell • 0.(6.is architect EXPIRATION DATE:06.30.2013 THIS SEAL IS FOR ARCHITECTURAL INFORMATION ONLY 1360 South Concordia • Republic,MO 65738 I417.••4550 • gemcreations@sbcglobcd.net -- 411111■-_ / III APPRO I B :TC/PZ/DRB/BOA PZ PROJ C MANAGER It SYTHETIC STUCCO(MATCH PREFINISHED METAL PARAPET EXISTING). ACCENT COLOR AT CAP. T.O.PARAPET AROUND EXISTING BUILDING PERIMETER. (300 L.F. +/-,F.V.) SYTHETIC STUCCO(MATCH EXISTING). ACCENT COLOR. EXISTING MECH.SCREEN (STAIN) T.O. EXIST'G PARAPET ff-- ir ELEVATION 120'-8" g j i, - i y �a SYTHETIC STUCCO(MATCH s 1 EXISTING). FIELD COLOR. Ir METAL AWNING TO MATCH NEW METAL ROOF OVER METAL ROOF. EXISTING CANOPY. 1 - NEW METAL ROOF OVER 11.1 I EXISTING CANOPY. 1 -II ■u� SYTHETIC STUCCO ' " ii (MATCH ' FIELD COLOR. f SYNTHETIC STONE Mil EXISTING). . VENEER. .N IfF aCu: SYNTHETIC STONE— I VENEER. MECHANICAL SCREEN ENCLOSURE. -! 44i,. .,, GREGORY NORTH ELEVATION " "E 4P*,, , :1 MI El.1. . Scale: N. T. S. i,op„, 0 al eilill'' ',,,,.-e`'.:•a' ".i"3!..7"";--i?", Greg Millchell • ea to .1 , architect EXPIRATION DATE:06.30.2013 /i 4 THIS SEAL IS FOR ARCHITECTURAL INFORMATION ONLY 1360 South Concordia • Republic,MO 65738 417.6 550 • gemcreations@sbcglobal.net - , _..... -- --,,„,iiiiiii APPROVED J.0 �D T �.. Y TIC/PZ/DRB/BOA 1 I PZ PROJECT MANAGER iI PREFINISHED METAL PARAPET SYTHETIC STUCCO(MATCH CAP. EXISTING). ACCENT COLOR AT T.O.PARAPET AROUND EXISTING BUILDING PERIMETER. SYTHETIC STUCCO(MATCH EXISTING). ACCENT COLOR. (300 L.F. +/-,F.V.) .i T.O. EXISTG ELEVATION 120'$APE T� SYTHETIC STUCCO(MATCH -� EXISTING). FIELD COLOR. P METAL AWNING TO MATCH METAL ROOF. SYNTHETIC STONE VENEER. ta,. . ,tom �°' FICA-, 4 40805_ GREGORY / SOUTH ELEVATION EUCiENE. MITCHELL 1 Scale: N. T. S. r. . � �..�,., } ( fit. .r ; ._°it r Ai (Greg MI chell • eri.16.i architect EXPIRATION DATE:06.30.2013 \IIIIIMINummostio'........;///1; THIS SEAL IS FOR ARCHITECTURAL INFORMATION ONLY 136o South Concordia ■ Republic,MO 65738 I _ 4,7.6�4550 • gemcreations@sbcglobal.net 1 --- .4111111111111111111111111111.0.--- --- Alit, -.....sumilib,, ...--.......A.---- APPROVE�� • TC/PZ/DRB/BOA I D T I PZ PROJE T A AGER SYTHETIC STUCCO(MATCH EXISTING). ACCENT COLOR AT T.O.PARAPET AROUND EXISTING BUILDING PERIMETER. (300 L.F. +/-,F.V.) T.O. EXIST'G PARAPETS SYTHETIC STUCCO(MATCH il ELEVATION 120'-8" OR AT EXISTING). ACCENT CO T.O.PARAPET AROUND L '' I EXISTING BUILDING PERIMETER. I. NEW METAL ROOF OVER (300 L.F. +/,F.V.) EXISTING CANOPY. I 1 S •sa�Y law. iri j ? SYNTHETIC STONE I VENEER. SYTHETIC STUCCO(MATCH SYTHETIC STUCCO(MATCH it EXISTING). FIELD COLOR. EXISTING). FIELD COLOR. Al SWe D 1 1 4 ' ' - �; iCr1 1 .. GREGRY J EUC3ENE I I 1 EAST ELEVATION E� ., I, Scale: N. T. S. ,+ 111111 9,, , ) ' Greg M i ch ell • b'�.{�j.t2 , . ,architect EXPIRATION DATE:06.30.2013 1'il/ THIS SEAL IS FOR ARCHITECTURAL INFORMATION ONLY 736o South Concordia • Republic,MO 65738 Aill _ _ 417.6 4550 • gemcreations@a sbcglobal.net _ /� . - -�� -�� _� 11! APPROVED BY: TC/PZ/DRBIBOA I�l Z ��l PZ PROJECT MANAGER II 1 w NEW METAL ROOF OVER I EXISTING CANOPY. il ► —EXISTING ROOF TOP UNIT. I d EXISTING MECH.SCREEN. II (PAINT) i iopcfr ficA - Alk i T Pt (. GR ?RY• C EUGENE EXISTING ROOF TOP UNIT. , r • , ,,.. ,114,..41,, , 41*•Nis_l!'C''',A0P., IMECHANICAL SCREEN NEW METAL ROOF OVER bt iv ENCLOSURE. (LOCATED EXISTING CANOPY. I ON GROUND).I I 1. _ EXPIRATION DATE:06.30.2013 t THIS SEAL IS FOR ARCHITECTURAL INFORMATION ONLY I� ' ( /- METAL AWNING TO MATCH / METAL ROOF. i I - re M i://; chellarchitectROOFPLAN / , - - � Scale: N. T. S. q 136o South Concordia • Republic,MO 65738 I _ 417.6�4550 • gemcreations@sbcglobal.net _ _— A _ — _� _�_— ' I ---............:. „it .., -..--.. - ., 111t ::, //if .;:41°: a « I r .allillannil --4.-t„f f i , r EXISTING ROOF MEMBRANE. # f {,�; ' {{ LRV:47(ASSUMED) NOTE:EXISTING ROOF COLOR HAS d' r '� t' BEEN ASSUMED-NO '��' t ; PPL!PRIte- ii-1`1,-,. - - ,,, _.,:z. - ,-- DOCUMENTATION FOUND TO SUSTANTIATE EXISTING COLOR. ~, ' " r > ti '' t { Y q SYNTHETIC STUCCO. ACCENT COLOR. - 1 MATCH EXISTING FINISH. COLOR TO "--' .. BE EQUAL TO CARVED WOOD DE6125 AS MANUFACTURED BY DUNN EDWARDS PAINTSL.-SYNTHETIC STONE VENEER. 'CHARDONNAY LRV:20 DRYSTACK'AS NOTE:METAL AWNING/METAL ROOF/ MANUFACTUREDULTUREDSTONE', EB, 'CULTURED STONE',OR ALUMINUM STOREFRONT TO MATCH. EQUAL. SYNTHETIC STUCCO. FIELD COLOR. ALL COLORS SHOWN HERE ARE INTENDED TO SHOW APPROXIMATE COLOR. DO NOT MATCH EXISTING FINISH. COLOR TO USE THIS COLOR CHART AS THE FINAL SELECTION AS COLORS ARE AFFECTED BY AGE, BE EQUAL TO TRAIL DUST DE6123 AS TEXTURE, LIGHTING CONDITIONS, HEAT AND APPLICATION PROCESSES. COLOR MANUFACTURED BY DUNN EDWARDS SWATCHES WILL VARY IN COLOR TO THE ACTUAL PRODUCT DUE TO JOBSITE PAINTS CONDITIONS AND METHODS OF APPLICATIONS. LRV:40 /t NOTE:EXISTING MECHANICAL SCREEN TO MATCH. APPROV5T B .TC/PZ/DRB/BOA MA.Vig ,I .wiCA _ PZ PROJECT 1t ANAGER q'i �0eas ;TA.. GREGORY COLOR PALETTE i. EU�3ENE 1 MITCHELL . N. T. S. i � Scale: • �.;� - },������'' _dill t''-' - - rGreg Mve,.....„.„...„,....lasgligq:// :_77) h ell , b�,{gj,�2 architect .4; EXPIRATION DATE:06.30.2013 q THIS SEAL IS FOR ARCHITECTURAL INFORMATION ONLY 736o South Concordia • Republic,MO 65738 417.6 a••4550 • gemcreations@sbcglobal.net V --------.1."""------A. ---- .......01111111b... Np,��EY oQO gR,�OZ9 ilt} "°UNOEO 9> Development and Infrastructure Services July 23, 2012 Greg Mitchell Greg Mitchell Architect 1360 S. Concordia Republic, MO 65738 RE: Approval Letter - Final Architecture for North Valley Baptist Church located on the southeast corner of 1st Avenue and Palisades Road, OV1312-07. Dear Greg, Thank you for the second submittal for the above-referenced project on July 18, and the additional material that you provided. The architectural design for this project is now approved. Please do not hesitate to contact me if I can answer any questions, or be of further assistance. Sincerely, Q. XAQ...Ca‘ Rosevelt Arellano Planner Cc: File Permit Technicians Planning Permitting Inspection&Compliance Engineering Operations Transit (520)229-4821 (520)229-481 5 (520)229-4815 (520)229-4894 (520)229-5070 (520)229-4990 Caring for our heritage, our community, our future. 11000 N.La Canada Drive•Oro Valley,Arizona 85737 fax:(520)742-1022•www.orovallevDlS.com