The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutOV90316 9• TOWN OF ORO VALLEY STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: September 2,2003 TO: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FROM: Robert Conant, Planner II SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING — OV9-03-16, TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY TR (TRANSITIONAL ZONE) TO THE TOWN'S RS (RESIDENTIAL SERVICES)1 BOUNDED ON THE NORTH APPROXIMATELY % MILE SOUTH OF MAGEE ROAD1 ON THE EAST BY ORACLE ROAD, ON THE WEST BY THE TERMINUS OF NORTHERN AVENUE AND ON THE SOUTH BY CATALINA VILLAGE, PARCELS 225-512-690 AND 225-512-700 BACKGROUND: On May 7, 2003, the Town of Oro Valley annexed the above referenced area as part of a larger annexation of land called "Area B" (Ordinance No. (0) 03-09). The attached map identifies the location of the area and the current and proposed zoning designations. In accordance with State Statutes, the Town is required to change or "translate" the zoning on the annexed properties from its original zoning designation to the closest comparable Oro Valley zoning designation. Section 9-471(L) of the Arizona Revised Statutes (ARS) states: "A city or town annexing an area shall adopt zoning classifications which permit densities and uses no greater than those permitted by the county immediately before annexation. Subsequent changes in zoning of the annexed territory shall be made according to existing procedures established by the city or town for the rezoning of land." SUMMARY: The Pima County zoning designation for the area is Transitional Zone (TR) and the most similar Oro Valley zoning district is Residential Service (SR). The parcel abutting Oracle Road is developed with a doctor's office, the rear parcel is vacant. OVERVIEW OF THE PROPOSED TRANSLATIONAL ZONES: Pima County TR(Transitional Zone) The Pima County Zoning designation for this area is Transitional Zone (TR), a low intensity commercial and residential zone. Oro Valley RS (Residential Service) The Town's RS district permits offices, low intensity commercial, multi and single family residential uses. • TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Page 2 GENERAL PLAN COMFORMANCE: The proposed zoning designation limits uses to a less intensity than the General Plan Land Use designation would allow. The General Plan designation for the area is Neighborhood Commercial. The translational zoning will not be in conformance with the General Plan, state law; however, requires the Town to translate the zoning to its closest equivalent. NOTIFICATION: All property owners within the annexed area have been notified of this proposed translational zoning and the properties were posted in accordance with Town and State statutes. To date, staff has not received any comments. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend Town Council approval of the translational zoning from Pima County Transitional Zone to the Town's Residential Service District. SUGGESTED MOTIONS: The Planning and Zoning Commission may wish to consider one of the following suggested motions: I move to recommend that the Town Council approve OV9-03-16, translating the zoning from Pima County Transitional Zone to Oro Valley Residential Service District. OR I move to recommend that the Town Council approve OV9-03-16, translating the zoning from Pima County Transitional Zone to Oro Valley Residential Service District with the following conditions: Attachments: 1. Property location 2. Current &Proposed Zoning Map A A. 64/ Planning and Zoning Administrator F:\OV\OV 9\2003\9-03-16\REZ.PZ.RPT.doc re III iAX9t3i R:1Lv2:97a5;.?ko11.t3.tY°d"..11R.f��aCdS4a.1.C%ri.1t'1f 'J..KW!,;YMr•44„Y Yz f rt.+�SlF" 4,,,.„4.,„„ • , , ... ... 1 - ■ OV9-03-21 Ra II r O 9-03- 4 l� ..'50� ll 111 YQ:Pr:..YYo'W;iA ti3^ A"lYmliT.•esr.Fd:t4'CAX/:" IF 6Y § ii ■ i 1 $ V Ili Z i- `i — r ■ OV9-03-09 a, =▪p, OV9-03-08 ' 4 1 W Q �22u OV9.03-17 tl t. co i A ▪ z i f 5 rrr �ti 111-W V _ O 9-03.23 I jJ 1 ■ r ■ J4 'wr:H?AD,.A.,RE,'MI.A'+.,..., Uin`QFd 11,14t..3W/.4a1' £Mtl3v, SITU 11/1.ffi l:RaP�ZS3f21§fr'C6u;45;,,,,k:PIS;'i.'�i3t771ff�:..-,.i.AvA.,....."Y.4...S:�pfiNf6ti'..'...vi`+,a�n°k'1.k1S'W]SuFS..v,..4 h,,,,,,,,4040,16,,..',.i,2.1}..9c 0. ,WWF'�ickFe e y e lid"e{�l ■ OV9-03.23 <.L. OV9.03-18 "" OV9.03.09 1 ▪ y • -•3-14 $ 4 Pr — ■ ii 111 uvu.wz�essaosr aatatrc< 4'.S ate. • w e_a;euv5 a: �. swy wmmsa.basv ar wxra e a.rvY Yq.ffi ,....6N4.1.4Y i3 R�l YLf A4 n fi Yam:hC G46�A£%M Y:X4 CA i.M,W...Lb Wt.o £3 �M 4?:C4 — MAGEE ROAD - {;u4,Yc1�'roYKW7�Gtifl:`.kdf"".7t.4E4.1....wfL^+2.....ais3.''PIr\+#i4Y.l ,..".'S.+0...i;7.$.u.,"'84'Y',.,...+�SU'L'&W±T,@c+f',:^.15,'....`tv,[s:t4..1,3.4?,,,,YdI`,,,•dN d..S'G>w:weE 41,....tn4''.1se,WI,..1,;J?porn"M%tkz,,, .G: `i oittd#:Tr1''3Ek]:.K.t..45Yc:e�,,re3�f.,,,�,lGt`:..4.161•4 s:Y:,113i'1WY,.ar;d t.�EN'{,ilt — 5 c`. k` t§ �s _ j ■ -012 4 1 Cr 1 1, ! OV9.03-19 i III LI,i OV9-03-07j yi 4 I ■ Q �tP$ ■ ., �.`'��' � 'R�:fd.`,iFt:RUdff6fXtY.Y`51ttS'.�.`:'�.iS0.5n'+a9AYeRkSMlleNE`2L4:[@,•da•A�'.c — ,,V9-03- ■ 9:93-1, .,4 111111 s OV9-03-05 ,.r... — tr■ II 1 e OV9-03.10 111 if V9-03-2 2 / p ;k"■ — i I ', — I/ ... i ■ V9-03-0.1 ■ j■ - ■ -' V9.03-0 04 3-13 °M., a7s =^ *^+Z ' r * " !**trt -=N his 3 'uLI u a "sui a4t w= 0 W= 'El 2 I=ISZEIC1 IF • Translational Zoning L I! i i CNI i Ili ! i PIC) i e G4‘' toRIDGE DR rz XLQ 1 z cc W . 0 I al g (..) • i 0 z I z Z o . > co ! < ,.., . w I Z ce I I 73 Isip‘'l W HARELSON ST 0 c VO z si z t3 m , I r 4 . o . 73 W SUFFOLK DR 4 0 Pima County TR Zoning 41/4- 4 0 to Oro Valley R-S Zoning < F: 0 2 vr r . > WCHAPALA DR I --"---------------------------..-----..---"11-...—"----...""--1---E6ETgrrufrIgni 7, < < 5 N PALM C6 < c.) o (..) iv la.J ›- fr z AT A. ,1/4 Ni0 1- ,q9 SO N D , z „Olt' z x sr m •st 7a z ,AOS c.PV- > .. OV9 - 03 - 16 Translational Zoning 0 AFFIDAVIT PUBLICATION STATE OF ARIZONA) AUG 2 0 2003 ss. COUNTY OF PIMA ) K AREN BR GHAM being first duly sworn, deposes and says that (he) (she) is the Legal Advertising Manager of THE DAILY TERRITORIAL, a daily newspaper printed and published in the County of Pima, State of Arizona, and of general circulation in the City of Tuc- son, County of Pima, State of Arizona and elsewhere, and the hereto attached 0\19-03•-16 PURL I C NOT ICE was printed and published correctly in the regular and entire issue of said THE f. DAILY TERRITORIAL for issues; that was first made 13th AUGUST 03 on the day of 20 1 3t.h and the last publication thereof was made on the day of AUGUST 0:3. 20 ; that said publication was made n each of the following dates, to-wit: 08/13;03 Request of TOWN OF O ;O VALLEY Daily Territorial 6 _ e -tz/y// ()'''7 '2 Subscribed and sworn to before .• , l day of ) 1f., ' AUGUST 20 P if,- fr .1 ! Notary Pue'��\�: 'i .t , +. y of Pi , ate of Arizona .,, R..- ..Hey My Commission Expires`: itts NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION In accordance with ARS 9-462 and Section 3-108 of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Re- vised,NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FOR RE- CENTLY ANNEXED PROPERTY BEFORE THE ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION IS HEREBY GIVEN: TIME:at or after 6:00 p.m.on TUESDAY,SEPTEMBER 2,2003 PLACE:Oro Valley Town Hall,Council Chambers 11000 North La Canada Drive Oro Valley,Arizona SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING—OV9-03-16,TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PI- MA COUNTY TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY EQUIVALENT FOR THE ANNEXED AREA,BOUNDED ON THE NORTH APPROXIMATELY_MILE SOUTH OF MAGEE ROAD,ON THE EAST BY ORACLE ROAD,ON THE WEST BY THE TERMINUS OF NORTHERN AVENUE AND ON THE SOUTH BY CATALINA VILLAGE: TRANSLATION ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY TR(TRANSITIONAL ZONE)TO THE TOWN'S R-S(RESIDENTIAL SERVICE DISTRICT)DESIGNATION FOR PAR- CEL NUMBERS;225-512-690 AND 225-512-700. The property was annexed to the Town on May 7,2003 and,in accordance with State Statutes,the Town is required to change or"translate"the zoning on annexed proper- ties to the closest comparable zoning district within the new jurisdiction. Members of the public are invited to attend this meeting and will be given an opportu- nity to speak. An agenda for the meeting will be made available 24 hours prior to meeting time. Should you have any questions regarding this matter,please contact Bob Conant,Planner II,at(520)229-4822 or bconant@orovalley.net./s/Bayer Vella, AICP Senior Planner Pub:The Daily Territorial August 13,2003 Req:Town of Oro Valley pnov9-03-16 kb • NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION In accordance with ARS 9-462 and Section 3-108 of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised, NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FOR RECENTLY ANNEXED PROPERTY BEFORE THE ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION IS HEREBY GIVEN: TIME: at or after 6:00 p. m. on TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 PLACE: Oro Valley Town Hall, Council Chambers 11000 North La Canada Drive Oro Valley, Arizona SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING—OV9-03-16, TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY EQUIVALENT FOR THE ANNEXED AREA,BOUNDED ON THE NORTH APPROXIMATELY %2 MILE SOUTH OF MAGEE ROAD, ON THE EAST BY ORACLE ROAD, ON THE WEST BY THE TERMINUS OF NORTHERN AVENUE AND ON THE SOUTH BY CATALINA VILLAGE: TRANSLATION ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY TR(TRANSITIONAL ZONE) TO THE TOWN'S R-S (RESIDENTIAL SERVICE DISTRICT) DESIGNATION FOR PARCEL NUMBERS; 225-512-690 AND 225-512-700. The property was annexed to the Town on May 7, 2003 and, in accordance with State Statutes, the Town is required to change or"translate"the zoning on annexed properties to the closest comparable zoning district within the new jurisdiction. Members of the public are invited to attend this meeting and will be given an opportunity to speak. An agenda for the meeting will be made available 24 hours prior to meeting time. Should you have any questions regarding this matter,please contact Bob Conant, Planner II, at(520) 229-4822 or bcona &orovalleynet. Posted: 8-12-03 a r e a, AICP Time: 10 : 15 a.m. Senior Planner B y: s g F:\OV\OV9\2003\9-03-16\REZ.PZ.NOTICE.doc APPROVED MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR SESSION SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11000 NORTH LA CANADA DRIVE REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL PRESENT: Vice Chair Cox, Acting Chair Commissioner Kinared Commissioner Manross Commissioner Krenkowitz Commissioner Anning EXCUSED: Chair Moody Commissioner Bistany Others Present: Mayor Paul Loomis Werner Wolff, Council Member Jeff Weir, Economic Development Administrator Mark Langlitz, Town Attorney Scott Nelson, Special Projects Coordinator Bill Adler, Board of Adjustments Bayer Vella, AICP, Senior Planner MINUTES MOTION: Commissioner Kinared MOVED to approve the August 5, 2003 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting minutes as written. Commissioner Manross seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-0. CALL TO THE AUDIENCE OPENED: 6:03 P.M. Bill Adler, 10720 N. Eagle Eye Pl., Oro Valley, wanted to point out that Mixed Use is not, nor has ever been, an approved land use designation in any Oro Valley general plan. It has been directed by Council to be removed from the General Plan pending ratification of the voters. The problem is that Mixed Use is in our zoning code. It exists in many of the commercial designations and residential designations. There is a contradiction between the General Plan and the Zoning Code. He believes this needs to be reconciled. A joint study session with Town Council should be requested, with DRB included. He asked that the Commission make a good faith effort to get with the Council and resolve this so there is uniformity. September 2,2003 Approved P&Z Meeting Minutes CALL TO THE AUDIENCE CLOSED: 6:06 P.M. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: OV8-03-05, DANIELA SHOUSE, REPRESENTING TORINO RISTORANTE ITALIANO, REQUESTS APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE SALE OF LIQUOR ASSOCIATED WITH A FULL-SERVICE RESTAURANT LOCATED WITHIN THE CANADA CROSSROADS SHOPPING CENTER IN A C-N (NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL) DISTRICT AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LA CANADA DRIVE AND LAMBERT LANE, A PORTION OF PARCEL NO. 224-39-OO1E. Mr. Vella presented his Staff Report for OV8-03-05. The applicant wants to establish a 2,400 square foot restaurant and is in the process of receiving building permits to do so. He is requesting the ability to offer a full bar with beer, wine and liquor with hours of operation from 11 A.M. to 11 P.M. There are two other restaurants in the shopping center that currently have similar liquor licenses and have been in place for 2-3 years. Applicant, Mr. Shouse, who owns of Café Torino, stated that he has operated the restaurant since January, 2001. They would like expand their facilities to offer more upscale dining for the area. They hope they can go forward with the liquor license. The restaurant should be open by about October 20. Mr. Vella responded to Commissioner Kinared that of the two conditions in Exhibit A, condition #1 is worded differently than what was specified on Page 1 of the report. Condition #2 varies slightly by allowing the time to be from 11 A.M. to 11 P.M., seven days a week. Mr. Vella told Commissioner Krenkowitz that the language in the CUP recommended on 11/13/2001 and Exhibit A should be the same. PUBLIC HEARING OPENED AND CLOSED AT 6:10 P.M.: No Speakers. MOTION: Commissioner Krenkowitz MOVED to recommend approval of OV8-03-05, Torino Ristorante Italiano's request for a conditional use permit to serve liquor, with the conditions listed in Exhibit A, with one change: that paragraph 1 as now stated be deleted and in place of that be inserted, "that recorded or live outside entertainment must not be allowed." Commissioner Kinared seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-0. 2. DISCUSSION ITEM: OVERVIEW OF THE RECENTLY ANNEXED PROPERTIES NEAR THE INTERSECTION OF ORACLE AND MAGEE ROADS AND THE TRANSLATIONAL ZONING PROCESS Mr. Vella stated that item #2 was to present an overview of the history of annexation, where we are today and what are the legal parameters of the translational zoning process. Mr. Scott Nelson presented an overview of the annexation process which allows for municipalities to go through a process for one year to gather 50% plus 1 of the total property owners of an area and 50% plus 1 for the total assessed value of an area. On area B, the process ended on April 4, 2003. As of that date, we had 53% of the property owners and 67% of the total 2 September 2,2003 Approved P&Z Meeting Minutes assessed value. This area is unique with great diversity with subdivisions greater than 30 years old. The area included condos, residential, townhouses, apartments, commercial zones and a school. The total area size is 655 acres with a population of 2,234 and 120 plus businesses. During the annexation process, there were applicants that came to us requesting pre-annexation agreements, which went before the Commission and Town Council and were acted on. The letters in your packet were for certain areas that wanted to retain their developmental rights that they had in the County. Attorney Mark Langlitz stated that this annexation has been a lengthy process and is at a point where it has been completed with regard to any legal action that was taken. The Town has prevailed on that. This is one of the largest areas that the Town has annexed with a wide variety of uses. It is now necessary that the Town translate the zoning from the existing County to the Town zoning---keeping in mind that the property owners should retain their existing rights under the County zoning. The Town will translate to the closest existing comparable districts so long as it does not increase the use or intensity. Staff has looked at all the individual parcels and has determined which is the most appropriate Town zoning district for the property to be translated to. The nature of the action this evening is administrative as opposed to legislative. This is required by statute. Acting Chair Cox stated that for the sake of expedience, items #3 through 19 on the revised agenda basically have the same type of administrative action that needs to be taken He asks the Commissioners and the audience if the process could be varied so that all Staff Reports were presented at once and then hold a public hearing for all items at once. Voting on the items #3 through 19 would be done separately after the public hearing and any comments. There were no objections to this suggested process from either the Commissioners or the audience. 3. PUBLIC HEARING: OV9-03-21, TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY EQUIVALENT FOR THE ANNEXED AREA LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF NORTHERN AVENUE AND CAMINO CORTARO FROM PIMA COUNTY CR-4 (MIXED DWELLING TYPE ZONE) TO THE TOWN'S R-4 (TOWNHOUSE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT) DESIGNATION FOR PARCEL NUMBERS; 225-142-770, 225-142-780, 225-142-790, 225- 142-800, 225-143-440, 225-143-420, 225-143-310, 225-143-320, 225-143-330, 225-143-300, 225-143-290 225-143-280, 225-143-270, 225-143-260, 225-143-250, 225-143-240, 225-143- 410, 225-143-400, 225-143-340, 225-143-390, 225-143-380, 225-143-370, 225-143-360, 225- 143-350, 225-143-430, 225-142-810, 225-142-820, 225-142-830, 225-142-840, 225-142-850, 225-142-860, 225-142-870, 225-142-880, 225-142-890, 225-142-900, 225-142-910, 225-142- 920, 225-142-930, 225-142-940, 225-142-950, 225-142-960, 225-142-970, 225-142-980, 225- 142-990, 225-143-000, 225-143-010, 225-143-020, 225-143-030, 225-143-040, 225-143-050, 225-43-060, 225-143-070, 225-143-080, 225-143-090, 225-143-100, 225-143-110, 225-143-120, 225-143-130, 225-143-140, 225-143-150, 225-143-160, 225-143-170, 225-143-180, 225-143- 190, 225-143-200, 25-143-210, 225-143-220, 225-143-230 4. PUBLIC HEARING: OV9-03-08, TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY EQUIVALENT FOR THE ANNEXD AREA LOCATED BETWEEN ORACLE ROAD AND NORTHERN AVENUE, NORTH OF COOL DRIVE FROM PIMA COUNTY TR (TRANSITIONAL ZONE) TO THE TOWN'S R-S (RESIDENTIAL SERVICE DISTRICT) DESIGNATION FOR PARCEL 3 September 2, 2003 Approved P&Z Meeting Minutes NUMBERS; 225-141-890, 225-142-740, 225-142-730, 225-142-720, 225-142-710, 225-142- 700, 225-142-750, 225-142-690, 225-142-680, 225-142-670, 225-142-660, 225-142-540, 225- 142-530, 225-142-760, 225-142-550, 225-142-560, 225-142-750, 225-142-570, 225-142-580, 225-142-760, 225-142-600, 225-142-590, 225-142-760, 225-142-610, 225-142-620, 225-142- 630, 225-142-640, 225-142-650, 225-141-850, 225-141-830, 225-162-820, 225-162-810, 225- 162-800, 225-162-190, 225-162-080, 225-162-090, 225-162-200, 229-143-480, 225-143-490, 225-143-500, 225-143-510, 225-143-540, 225-143-520, 225-143-530, 225-143-460, 225-143- 470, 225-143-460, 225-161-640, 225-161-650, 225-161-860, 225-161-870, 225-161-850, 225- 161-840, 225-161-670, 225-161-660, 225-161-680, 225-161-690, 225-161-820, 225-161-830, 225-161-810, 225-161-800, 225-161-710, 225-161-700, 225-161-790, 225-161-780, 225-161- 730, 225-161-720, 225-161-740, 225-161-750, 225-161-760, 225-161-770, 225-162-790, 225- 162-780, 225-162-760, 225-162-770, 225-162-730, 225-162-720, 225-162-750, 225-162-740, 225-162-710, 225-162-700, 225-162-690, 25-162-680, 225-162-660, 225-162-670, 225-162- 650, 225-162-640, 225-162-810, 225-162-590, 225-162-600, 225-162-570, 225-162-580, 225- 162-550, 225-162-540, 225-162-620, 225-162-560, 225-162-630, 225-162-610, 225-162-410, 225-162-400, 225-162-390, 225-162-420, 225-162-370, 225-162-430, 225-162-380, 225-162- 440, 225-162-460, 225-162-470, 225-162-450, 225-162-350, 225-162-480, 225-162-490, 225- 162-360, 225-162-500, 225-162-510, 225-162-330, 225-162-520, 225-162-530, 225-162-340, 225-162-320, 225-162-310, 225-162-270, 225-162-260, 225-162-300, 225-162-280, 225-162- 290, 225-162-230, 225-162-210, 225-162-220, 225-162-240, 225-162-250, 225-162-170, 225- 162-180, 225-162-190, 225-162-150, 225-162-160, 225-162-140, 225-162-100, 225-162-110, 225-162-120, 225-162-130, 225-161-990, 225-161-980, 225-161-970, 225-161-960, 225-162- 010, 225-162-000, 225-162-950, 225-161-940, 225-162-030, 225-162-020, 225-162-930, 225- 161-920, 225-162-050, 225-162-040, 225-162-910, 225-161-900, 225-162-060, 225-162-070, 225-161-890, 225-161-880 5. PUBLIC HEARING: OV9-03-14, TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY EQUIVALENT FOR THE ANNEXED AREA, LOCATED BETWEEN ORACLE ROAD AND NORTHERN AVENUE, NORTH OF MAGEE ROAD FROM PIMA COUNTY CB-1 (LOCAL BUSINESS ZONE) DESIGNATION TO THE TOWN'S C-2 (COMMERCIAL DISTRICT) DESIGNATION WITH CONDITIONS FOR PARCEL NUMBERS; 225-143-480, 225-143-550 (PORTION), AND FOR THE ANNEXED AREA LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ORACLE ROAD SOUTH OF CAMINO CORTARO FOR PARCELS 225-141-740, 225-141-770, 225- 141-780, 225, 225-141-76B, 225-141-76A, 225-141-750, 225-141-80A, 225-141-92C (PORTION), 225-141-170C, 225-141-70A, 225-141-70B, 225-141-710 AND 225-141-73A; 6. PUBLIC HEARING: OV9-03-22, TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY EQUIVALENT FOR THE ANNEXED AREA, LOCATED ONE QUARTER MILE NORTH FROM THE INTERSECTION OF ORACLE ROAD AND MAGEE ROAD ON THE WEST SIDE OF ORACLE ROAD FROM PIMA COUNTY SR (SUBURBAN RANCH ZONE) TO THE TOWN'S R-144 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT) DESIGNATION FOR PARCEL NUMBER 225-141-870 7. PUBLIC HEARING: OV9-03-23, TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY EQUIVALENT FOR THE ANNEXED AREA LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF NORTHERN AVENUE AND 4 September 2,2003 Approved P&Z Meeting Minutes COOL DRIVE FROM PIMA COUNTY CB-2 (GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE) TO THE TOWNS C-2 (COMMERCIAL DISTRICT) FOR PARCELS 225-141-790, 225-141-92B, 225-141-92C, 225-141-80A (PORTION) AND THE ANNEXED AREA LOCATED ONE QUARTER MILE NORTH FROM THE INTERSECTION OF ORACLE ROAD AND MAGEE ROAD ON THE WEST SIDE OF ORACLE ROAD FOR PARCEL NUMBER; 229-141-90A 8. PUBLIC HEARING: OV9-03-12, TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY TR (MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENCE) ZONE TO THE TOWN'S R-S (RESIDENTIAL SERVICE) DISTRICT DESIGNATION FOR PARCEL NUMBER 225- 50-0040, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF MAGEE ROAD AND NORTHERN AVENUE IN ANNEXATION AREA "B" AND DEVELOPED AS AN OFFICE BUILDING. 9. PUBLIC HEARING: OV9-03-13, TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY SR (SUBURBAN RANCH) ZONE TO THE TOWN'S R1-144 (SINGLE- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT DESIGNATION FOR 1,743 SQUARE FOOT PARCEL (NO. 225-50-0070) OWNED BY THE CITY OF TUCSON AS A WELL SITE AND LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF W. CHAPALA DRIVE AND NORTHERN AVENUE. 10. PUBLIC HEARING: OV9-03-16, TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY EQUIVALENT FOR THE ANNEXED AREA, BOUNDED ON THE NORTH APPROXIMATELY %2 MILE SOUTH OF MAGEE ROAD, ON THE EAST BY ORACLE ROAD, ON THE WEST BY THE TERMINUS OF NORTHERN AVENUE AND ON THE SOUTH BY CATALINA VILLAGE: TRANSLATION ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY TR (TRANSITIONAL ZONE) TO THE TOWN'S R-S (RESIDENTIAL SERVICE DISTRICT) DESIGNATION FOR PARCEL NUMBERS; 225-512-690 AND 225-512-700. 11. PUBLIC HEARING: OV9-03-09, TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY EQUIVALENT FOR THE ANNEXED AREA, BOUNDED ON THE WEST BY ORACLE ROAD, ON THE SOUTH BY RIDGEVIEW PLAZA, ON THE NORTH BY DESERT WILLOWS SUBDIVISION AND ON THE EAST BY RANCHO CATALINA, THE AREA IS ALSO KNOWN AS VERDE CATALINA TOWNHOUSES, AND FURTHER THE AREA KNOWN AS CATALINA CITRUS ESTATES (SISTERS OF THE IMMACULATE HEART), BOUNDED ON THE WEST BY RIDGEVIEW PLAZA, ON THE SOUTH BY MAGEE ROAD, ON THE NORTH BY RANCHO CATALINA AND ON THE EAST BY THE CORONADO NATIONAL FOREST: TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY SR (SUBURBAN RANCH) TO THE TOWN'S R1-144 (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) DESIGNATION FOR PARCEL NUMBERS; 225-142-400, 225-142-41A, 225-142-43A, 225-170-17B, 225-170-18B, 225-170-190, 225-141-91A, 225-130-10A, 225-170-25A, 225-170-26A, 225-170-280, 225-170- 290, 225-170-320, 225-130-11A, 225-170-330, 225-170-340, 225-170-350, 225-170-360, 225- 170-370, 225-170-380, 225-170-390, 225-130-120, 225-161-240, 225-161-250, 225-161-260, 5 September 2,2003 Approved P&Z Meeting Minutes 225-161-270, 225-161-280, 225-161-290, 225-161-300, 225-161-310, 225-161-320, 225-161- 330, 225-161-230, 225-161-500, 225-161-340, 225-161-220, 225-161-510, 225-161-490, 225- 161-350, 225-161-210, 225-161-520, 225-161-480, 225-161-360, 225-161-200, 225-161-530, 225-161-370, 225-161-540, 225-161-380, 225-161-550, 225-161-390, 225-161-190, 225-161- 560, 225-161-180, 225-161-470, 225-161-170, 225-161-570, 225-161-400, 225-161-460, 225- 161-160, 225-161-580, 225-161-410, 225-161-450, 225-161-150, 225-161-420, 225-161-590, 225-161-440, 225-161-140, 225-161-430, 225-161-630, 225-160-900, 225-161-070, 225-160- 910, 225-161-130, 225-161-120, 225-161-110, 225-161-100, 225-161-060, 225-161-090, 225- 161-080, 225-160-920, 225-161-050, 225-160-930, 225-161-040, 225-161-030, 225-160-940, 225-160-950, 225-160-960, 225-160-970, 225-160-980, 225-160-990, 225-161-000, 225-161- 010, 225-161-020, 225-161-620, 225-160-520, 225-160-530, 225-160-540, 225-160-550, 225- 160-560, 225-160-570, 225-160-580, 225-160-590, 225-160-600, 225-160-610, 225-160-500, 225-160-620, 225-160-500, 225-160-630, 225-160-810, 225-160-800, 225-160-790, 225-160- 780, 225-160-770, 225-160-760, 225-160-490, 225-160-640, 225-160-650, 225-160-480, 225- 160-820, 225-160-830, 225-160-840, 225-160-850, 225-160-660, 225-160-670, 225-160-470, 225-160-680, 225-160-460, 225-160-750, 225-160-860, 225-160-690, 225-160-450, 225-160- 740, 225-160-870, 225-160-700, 225-160-440, 225-160-730, 225-160-880, 225-160-710, 225- 160-430, 225-160-720, 225-160-890, 225-160-420, 225-160-410, 225-161-610, 225-160-330, 225-160-340, 225-160-320, 225-160-350, 225-160-150, 225-160-310, 225-160-400, 225-160- 390, 225-160-380, 225-160-370, 225-160-360, 225-160-160, 225-160-300, 225-160-170, 225- 160-180, 225-161-600, 225-160-190, 225-160-200, 225-160-210, 225-160-220, 225-160-230, 225-160-240, 225-160-250, 225-160-260, 225-160-270, 225-160-280, 225-160-290. 12. PUBLIC HEARING: OV9-03-17 TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY EQUIVALENT FOR THE ANNEXED AREA, BOUNDED ON THE WEST APPROXIMATELY 630 FEET EAST OF ORACLE ROAD, ON THE SOUTH APPROXIMATELY 580 FEET NORTH OF MAGEE ROAD, ON THE NORTH BY RANCHO CATALINA NORTH (SOUTH OF CATALINA SHADOWS BOULEVARD) AND ON THE EAST BY THE CORONADO NATIONAL FOREST, THE AREA IS ALSO KNOWN AS RANCHO CATALINA: TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY CR-i (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE) TO THE TOWN'S R1-36 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT) DESIGNATION FOR PARCEL NUMBERS; 225-141-91A225-130-11A, 225- 130-10A, 225-170-280, 225-170-18B, 225-170-17B, 225-170-290, 225-170-190, 225-170-240, 225-170-340, 225-170-25A, 225-170-330, 225-170-230, 225-170-200, 225-170-350, 225-170- 26A, 225-170-390, 225-170-360, 225-170-380, 225-170-370, 225-170-220, 225-170-320, 225- 170-270, 225-170-400, 225-170-210, 225-170-160, 225-170-300, 225-170-310, 225-170-760, 225-170-150, 225-170-140, 225-170-460, 225-170-770, 225-170-130, 225-170-750, 225-170- 450, 225-170-470, 225-170-440, 225-170-430, 225-170-120, 225-170-420, 225-170-410, 225- 161-630, 225-170-780, 225-170-090, 225-170-740, 225-170-730, 225-170-720, 225-170-100, 225-170-480, 225-170-710, 225-170-700, 225-170-790, 225-170-850, 225-170-800, 225-170- 110, 225-170-490, 225-170-520, 225-170-500, 225-170-510, 225-170-840, 225-170-810, 225- 170-860, 225-170-510, 225-170-690, 225-170-680, 225-170-830, 225-170-080, 225-161-620, 225-170-670, 225-170-070, 225-170-820, 225-170-870, 225-170-650, 225-170-660, 225-170- 550, 225-170-540, 225-170,530, 225-170-560, 225-170-580, 225-170-880, 225-170-950, 225- 170-060, 225-170-890, 225-170-900, 225-170-640, 225-170-940, 225-170-590, 225-170-600, 225-172-210, 225-170-960, 225-170-930, 225-170-610, 225-172-160, 225-170-050, 225-170- 6 September 2, 2003 Approved P&Z Meeting Minutes 920, 225-170-910, 225-170-630, 225-170-620, 225-172-170, 225-172-150, 225-172-180, 225- 171-060, 225-172-190, 225-172-200, 225-170-980, 225-170-970, 225-170-990, 225-171-000, 225-171-010, 225-170-040, 225-161-610, 225-171-020, 225-171-030, 225-172-140, 225-171- 040, 225-171-050, 225-172-130, 225-172-120, 225-172-090, 225-172-100, 225-172-110, 225- 172-22A. 13. PUBLIC HEARING: OV9-03-18, TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY EQUIVALENT FOR THE ANNEXED AREA, BOUNDED ON THE WEST BY ORACLE ROAD, ON THE NORTH BY VERDE CATALINA TOWNHOUSES, ON THE EAST BY THE SISTERS OF THE IMMACULATATE HEART AND ON THE SOUTH BY MAGEE ROAD, THE AREA IS ALSO KNOWN AS RIDGEVIEW PLAZA: TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY CB-1 (LOCAL BUSINESS ZONE) TO THE TOWN'S C-2 (COMMERCIAL DISTRICT) DESIGNATION FOR THE FOLLOWING PARCEL NUMBERS; 225-141-93D, 225-142-400, 225-141-93B, 225-142- 510, 225-142-41A, 225-142-520, 225-142-48A, 225-141-94A, 225-142-460, 225-142-43A, 225- 161-630, 225-170-17B. 14. PUBLIC HEARING: OV9-03-07, TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY CB-1 (LOCAL BUSINESS) DISTRICT TO THE TOWN'S C-2 (COMMERCIAL) DISTRICT DESIGNATION, WITH CONDITIONS, FOR PARCEL NUMBERS 225-51-004A, 225-51-2170, 225-51-2180, 225-51-2140, 225-51-2160 AND 225- 51-2150, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF MAGEE ROAD AND ORACLE ROAD IN ANNEXATION AREA "B" AND DEVELOPED AS THE "PLAZA ESCONDIDA" SHOPPING CENTER. 15. PUBLIC HEARING: OV9-03-10, TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY EQUIVALENT FOR THE ANNEXED AREA, BOUNDED ON THE NORTH BY MAGEE ROAD, ON THE WEST APPROXIMATELY 445-FEET EAST OF ORACLE ROAD, ON THE SOUTH BY CATALINA VILLAGE AND WESTWARD LOOK GUEST RANCH AND ON THE EAST BY COBO CATALINA HILLS, THE AREA IS ALSO KNOWN AS SUFFOLK HILLS: TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY CR-1 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE) TO THE TOWN'S R1-36 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT) DESIGNATION FOR PARCEL NUMBERS; 225-511-320, 225-512-080, 225- 510-280, 225-511-480, 225-511-200, 225-511-300, 225-510-210, 225-511-40A, 225-511-470, 225-511-41A, 225-510-220, 225-512-070, 225-511-890, 225-511-290, 225-510-230, 225-511- 42A, 225-510-290, 225-510-270, 225-510-260, 225-510-240, 225-510-250, 225-511-210, 225- 511-280, 225-511-43B, 225-511-900, 225-512-060, 225-511-220, 225-511-44A, 225-511-910, 225-511-230, 225-511-450, 225-511-460, 225-512-05A, 225-511-920, 225-510-300, 225-511- 240, 225-510-440, 225-511-930, 225-511-250, 225-512-04A, 225-510-430, 225-511-100, 225- 511-880, 225-511-270, 225-511-260, 225-511-940, 225-511-110, 225-510-420, 225-512-030, 225-510-410, 225-512-020, 225-512-010, 225-511-950, 225-512-000, 225-511-390, 225-5 - 10 400, 225-510-390, 225-510-380, 225-510-370, 225-510-310, 225-511-090, 225 510 450, 510-36B, 225-511-120, 225-511-960, 225-511-080, 225-511-130, 225-511-380, 225-510-460, 7 September 2,2003 Approved P&Z Meeting Minutes 225-510-36C, 225-511-970, 225-511-140, 225-511-150, 225-511-160, 225-511-170, 225-511- 180, 225-512-130, 225-512-120, 225-512-110, 225-511-980, 225-511-070, 225-511-33C, 225- 511-350, 225-512-100, 225-511-360, 225-510-470, 225-510-340, 225-510-330, 225-511-060, 225-511-370, 225-511-33D, 225-510-320, 225-510-480, 225-511-33E, 225-511-050, 225-512- 090,225-511-040, 225-511-820, 225-510-490, 225-511-030, 225-511-020, 225-511-810, 225-511-830, 225-511-010, 225-511-000, 225-510-790, 225-511-840, 225-510-92A, 225-511- 850, 225-510-530, 225-511-630, 225-511-860, 225-510-640, 225-511-620, 225-510-540, 225- 510-91A, 225-510-890, 225-511-610, 225-510-980, 225-510-930, 225-510-52A, 225-510-550, 225-511-730, 225-511-650, 225-510-500, 225-511-600, 225-510-900, 225-510-51A, 225-510- 560, 225-511-800, 225-511-790, 225-511-780, 225-511-770, 225-511-760, 225-511-780, 225- 511-750, 225-511-770, 225-511-740, 225-511-760, 225-511-750,225-510-970, 225-510-880, 225-510-840, 225-510-570, 225-510-970, 225-511-590, 225-510-940, 225-510-850, 225-511- 720, 225-510-950, 225-510-870, 225-510-860, 225-511-67A, 225-510-960, 225-510-580, 225- 510-81A, 225-511-580, 225-510-590, 225-511-710, 225-510-81B, 225-510-820, 225-510-740, 225-510-830, 225-511-570, 225-510-750, 225-510-600, 225-511-700, 225-510-730, 225-511- 690, 225-511-560, 225-510-610, 225-511-680, 225-511-55B, 225-510-720, 225-510-760, 225- 510-620, 225-510-800, 225-510-790, 225-510-780, 225-510-770, 225-510-630, 225-510-640, 225-510-650, 225-510-660, 225-510-670, 225-510-680, 225-510-690, 225-510-700, 225-510- 710, 225-500-010, 225-511-490, 225-511-500, 225-511-510, 225-511-520, 225-511-530, 225- 511-540, 225-511-55A, 225-511-190, 225-511-310. 16. PUBLIC HEARING: OV9-03-19, TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY EQUIVALENT FOR THE ANNEXED AREA, BOUNDED ON THE NORTH BY MAGEE ROAD AND ON THE WEST, SOUTH AND EAST BY SUFFOLK HILLS, THE AREA IS ALSO KNOWN AS THE IMMACULATE HEART SCHOOL: TRANSLATION ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY SR (SUBURAN RANCH) TO THE TOWN'S R1-144 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT) DESIGNATION FOR PARCEL NUMBER: 225-500-010. 17. PUBLIC HEARING: OV9-03-06, TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY TR (TRANSITIONAL) ZONE TO THE TOWN'S R-S (RESIDENTIAL SERVICE) DISTRICT DESIGNATION FOR PARCEL NUMBER 225-51-0190; AND FROM PIMA COUNTY TR (TRANSITIONAL) ZONE TO THE TOWN'S R-S (RESIDENTIAL SERVICE) DISTRICT DESIGNATION WITH A CONDITION FOR PARCEL NUMBERS 225-51-011A, 225-51-018A AND 225-51-0200, ALL LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ORACLE ROAD BETWEEN MAGEE ROAD AND SUFFOLK DRIVE. 18. PUBLIC HEARING: OV9-03-15, TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY EQUIVALENT FOR THE ANNEXED AREA, BOUNDED ON THE WEST BY ORACLE ROAD, ON NORTH APPROXIMATELY 1,115-FEET SOUTH OF MAGEE ROAD, ON THE EAST BY SUFFOLK HILLS AND ON THE SOUTH APPROXIMATELY 1,075-FEET NORTH OF SUFFOLK HILLS DRIVE: 8 September 2, 2003 Approved P&Z Meeting Minutes TRANSLATION ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY SR (SUBURBAN RANCH) TO THE TOWN'S R1-144 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT) DESIGNATION FOR PARCEL NUMBER; 225-510-12A. 19. PUBLIC HEARING: OV9-03-20, TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY EQUIVALENT FOR THE ANNEXED AREA, BOUNDED ON THE WEST BY ORACLE ROAD, ON THE NORTH APPROXIMATELY 1,274-FEET SOUTH OF MAGEE ROAD, ON THE EAST BY SUFFOLK HILLS AND ON THE SOUTH APPROXIMATELY 503-FEET NORTH OF SUFFOLK HILLS DRIVE: TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY TR (TRANSITIONAL ZONE) TO THE TOWN'S R-S (RESIDENTIAL SERVICE DISTRICT) DESIGNATION FOR PARCEL NUMBERS; 225-510-130, 225-510-140, 225-510-150, 225-510-160, 225-510-17B AND 225-510-17A. Acting Chair Cox opened up discussion and questions from the Commissioners: Item #5, the development plan approved by Pima County will be honored by the Town, as well as any unfinished portions. It is functionally equivalent to a pre-annexation agreement. It would be good to add the condition that all development plans in place be honored. Item #15, OV9-03-10, Exhibit 4, last page indicates that translation is from Pima County CR-1 to Oro Valley, R1-144 whereas the text in the recommendation reflects R1-36. The correct zoning is R1-36. PUBLIC HEARING FOR ALL TRANSLATIONAL ZONINGS OPENED AT 6:40 P.M. Bill Adler, 10720 N. Eagle Eye asked to speak on Agenda item #3 and #5. He does not look as translational zonings as routine, so he objects to the procedure. He sees translational zoning as an opportunity to place zoning on property that reflects what we would like it to be rather than what it is. We can allow existing development to continue and no interference in development rights or pre-annexation agreements. If there were major changes or redevelopment in the area, then we should have zoning in place that we would like to have rather than the equivalent of what is in existence now. For example, item #3, he objects to the 34 foot building height, and if this area is ever redeveloped it should comply with Oro Valley zoning code. This should be stipulated. On item #5, he feels that it would be better to rezone to CN rather than C-1 because it is adjacent to residential areas. He is not suggesting mandating changes on existing zoning. The zoning we put into place creates a legal, non-conforming situation. Oro Valley has restrictive ordinance by reputation because we want a desirable appearance. John James, 661 Mountain Sunrise Place, withdrew from speaking as Mr. Vella answered his questions regarding horse property. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 6:45 P.M. 9 September 2,2003 Approved P&Z Meeting Minutes Acting Chair Cox opened up discussion and questions for Staff. There is no time period that the Town would have to wait to begin applying zoning classifications to the land to more closely represent how the land is used. Any change in zoning would have to follow the Town's normal rezoning procedure which would commence at any time and includes instigation by the Town itself. Change of ownership does not change any of the zoning requirements. It is attached to the land and stays with it no matter who owns the land. The translational zoning cannot increase intensity or uses, nor can the zoning be reduced. Zoning classification must be adopted that allow the property owner to retain their existing rights. Following are the motions on the forgoing Staff Reports: #3. MOTION: Commissioner Kinared MOVED to recommend that Town Council approve OV9-03-21, translating the zoning from Pima County CR-4 (Multiple Dwelling Type Zone) to Oro Valley R-4 (Townhouse Residential) for the proposed parcels, with a condition that the County CR-4 building height be maintained by the Town. Commissioner Krenkowitz seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-0. #4. MOTION: Commissioner Manross MOVED to recommend that Town Council approve OV9-03-08, translating zoning from Pima County TR(Transitional Zone) to Oro Valley R-S (Residential Service District) for the proposed parcels. Commissioner Anning seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-0. #5. MOTION: Commissioner Krenkowitz MOVED to recommend that the Town Council approve OV9-03-14, translating zoning from Pima County CB-1 (Local Business Zone) to the Oro Valley C-2 (Commercial District) for the proposed parcels, with the condition that the owner of the property commonly known as Plaza De Vida shall continue to have the development rights now accorded to that owner under the approved Development Plan recorded in Book 56, at page 99. Commissioner Manross seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-0. #6. MOTION: Commissioner Krenkowitz moved to recommend that the Town Council approve OV9-03-22, translating the zoning from Pima County SR (Suburban Ranch) to Oro Valley R1-144 (Single Family Residential) with the condition that the horse and other farm animal rights granted by the Town Council in Resolution 02-68 on August 1, 2002, be attached to the zoning. Commissioner Anning seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-0. #7. MOTION: Commissioner Krenkowitz MOVED to recommend that Town Council approve OV9-03-23, translating zoning from Pima County CB-2 (General Business Zone) to the Oro Valley C-2 (Commercial District) for the proposed parcels. Commissioner Manross seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-0. 10 September 2, 2003 Approved P&Z Meeting Minutes #8. MOTION: Commissioner Manross MOVED to recommend approval of OV9-03-12, translating zoning of Parcel No. 225-50-0040 to the Town of Oro Valley R-S (Residential Service) District. Commissioner Krenkowitz seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-0. #9. MOTION: Commissioner Anning MOVED to recommend approval of OV9-03-13, translating zoning of Parcel No. 225-50-0070 to the Town of Oro Valley R1-144 (Single Family Residential) District. Commissioner Krenkowitz seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-0. #10. MOTION: Commissioner Manross MOVED to recommend that the Town Council approve OV9-03-16, translating the zoning from Pima County Transitional Zone to Oro Valley Residential Service District. Commissioner Anning seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-0. #11. MOTION: Commissioner Krenkowitz MOVED to recommend that the Town Council approve OV9-03-09, translating zoning for the Verde Catalina Townhouses and the Sisters of the Immaculate Heart properties, from Pima County SR to Oro Valley R1-144, with the condition that horse and other farm animal rights permitted under the Pima County designation of Suburban Ranch will be recognized in accordance with the Resolution of the Town Council No. 02-68 adopted on August 1, 2002. Commissioner Manross seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-0. #12. MOTION: Commissioner Krenkowitz MOVED to recommend that the Town Council approve OV9-03-17, translating the zoning for Rancho Catalina from Pima County CR-1 to Oro Valley R1-36, subject to the two conditions set forth in Exhibit A to OV9-03-17. Commissioner Manross seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-0. #13. MOTION: Commissioner Manross MOVED to recommend that the Town Council approve OV9-03-18, translating the zoning for Ridgeview Plaza from Pima County CB-1 to Oro Valley C-2. Commissioner Anning seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-0. #14. MOTION: Commissioner Krenkowitz MOVED to recommend approval of OV9-03- 07, translating zoning of Parcel Nos. 225-51-004A, 225-51-2170, 225-51-2180, 225-51-2140, 225-51-2160, and 225-51-2150 from Pima County zoning CB-1 to the Town of Oro Valley C-2 (Commercial) District. Commissioner Anning seconded the motion. Motion carried 5- 0. #15. MOTION: Commissioner Krenkowitz MOVED to recommend that the Town Council approve OV9-03-10, translating zoning for Suffolk Hills, from Pima County CR-1 to Oro Valley R1-36, subject to the two conditions set forth in Exhibit A to OV9-03-10. Commissioner Kinared seconded the motion. Discussion: Commissioner Anning mentioned noting that Exhibit 4 needs to be corrected to read R1-36 instead of R1-144. Motion carried 5- 0. #16. MOTION: Commissioner Manross MOVED to recommend that the Town Council approve OV9-03-19, translating zoning for the Immaculate Heart School from Pima County SR to Oro Valley R1-144, subject to the condition listed in Exhibit A, attached herewith. Commissioner Krenkowitz seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-0. 11 September 2,2003 Approved P&Z Meeting Minutes #17. MOTION: Commissioner Krenkowitz MOVED to recommend approval of OV9-03- 06, translating zoning of Parcel Nos. 225-51-0190, 225-51-011A, 225-51-018A and 225-51- 0200 to the Town of Oro Valley zoning R-S (Residential Service) District, with the two conditions set forth in Exhibit A to OV9-03-06. Commissioner Anning seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-0. #18. MOTION: Commissioner Anning MOVED to recommend that the Town Council approve OV9-03-15, translating the zoning from Pima County Suburban Ranch to Oro Valley R1-144, subject to the one condition set forth in Exhibit A to OV9-03-15. Commissioner Manross seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-0. #19. MOTION: Commissioner Manross MOVED to recommend that the Town Council approve OV9-03-20, translating the zoning from Pima County Transitional Zone to Oro Valley Residential Service District. Commissioner Kinared seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-0. Commissioner Kinared would like to have Staff look into and report on Bill Adler's Call to the Audience comments regarding the conflict between the General Plan and Zoning Code Mixed Use designation and present at the next meeting. Commissioner Krenkowitz suggested that prior to Staff researching the above, that they consider if there is any conflict that requires resolution. Commissioner Krenkowitz would also like for Staff to report at the next meeting on what is happening with Cricket Communication. Has anything been done? What can be done? How does their bankruptcy affect the Town's ability to alleviate the violation? ADJOURN REGULAR SESSION MOTION: Commissioner Kinared MOVED to adjourn. Commissioner Krenkowitz seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-0. Meeting adjourned at 7:25 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Diane Chapman, Recording Secretary 12 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 5MEETING DATE: October 1,2003 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: Bayer Vella, AICP, Senior.Planner SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING—ORDINANCE NO. (0)03-32 AN ORDINANCE TRANSLATING THE ZONING FOR THE NEWLY ANNEXED AREA COMMONLY KNOWN AS AREA "B"FROM PIMA COUNTY ZONING DESIGNATIONS TO TOWN OF ORO VALLEY DESIGNATIONS AND AMENDING THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY ZONING MAP: AND REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH PROCESS: Approval of the attached ordinance would replace all Pima County zoning in the subject area with Town zones in one action. Within the ordinance, one will find a map and table that references the specific OV case numbers, associated parcel numbers, and corresponding conditions. For more specific information regarding each parcel or groups of parcels,please see each of the attached case reports. BACKGROUND: On April 7, 2003, the Town of Oro Valley annexed 654.7 acres in the vicinity of the Oracle/Magee Roads ntersection. This area has been commonly referred to as the "Area B" annexation, which was formalized with the adoption of Ordinance No. (0)03-09. Now that the annexation has been completed—the next principle step is to assign Town zoning. This is the focus of this agenda item. In accordance with State Statutes, the Town is required to change, or "translate" the zoning on the annexed properties from its original zoning designation to the closest comparable Oro Valley zoning designation. Section 9-471(L) of the Arizona Revised Statutes (ARS) states: "A city or town annexing an area shall adopt zoning classifications which permit densities and uses no greater than those permitted by the county immediately before annexation. Subsequent changes in zoning of the annexed territory shall be made according to existing procedures established by the city or town for the rezoning of land." SUMMARY: Ordinance No. (0)03-32 In all cases, staff utilized the most analogous categories. Whenever properties are translated and the two jurisdictions involved have distinct zoning codes, standards such as building heights do not always match. As a result, staff included conditions associated with particular properties to insure that rights are maintained. There are numerous examples, such as Suffolk Hills. This subdivision had been developed utilizing a 34 foot building height in the County and the Oro Valley standard is 18 feet. A condition to allow 34 feet was included in the ordinance. This will insure that redevelopment occurs in a consistent and equitable manner. Conformance with Town Resolution No. (R)03-68 Resolution (R) 02-68 was adopted by the Town Council on August 1, 2002. It provides that newly annexed areas will maintain livestock rights specified in the Pima County Zoning Code. A condition has been included for applicable parcels within the ordinance to insure such rights are preserved. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY • .OUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 2 Zoning History In the past,many of the subject parcels were rezoned in Pima County to allow more intensive development. The ordinance provides that all conditions of Pima County rezoning will be maintained with the translation. NOTIFICATION: All owners of property subject to this translational zoning have been notified of this proposed translational zoning and the property was posted in accordance with Town and State statutes. GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE: The majority of translation rezonings are in compliance with the General Plan (existing and/or proposed). For the cases not in compliance, the Town must still translate the zoning to the closest comparable district per Arizona Revised Statutes. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ACTION: On September 2, 2003, the Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously (5 to 0) recommended approval all of the proposed translational zoning. Please see attached case reports for specifics. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the attached ordinance. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. (0)03- , translating the zoning from Pima County to the Town of Oro Valley zoning districts for"Area B" as annexed by Ordinance(0)03-09 adopted April 7, 2003. ATTACHMENTS: / 1. Location and Zoning Map 2. Ordinance(0)03-32 fir; 3. OV Case Reports Plannin1117 Zoning dministrator Community Development Director Town Manager F:\OV\OV9\2003\Revised Area B Ord\TC Report Overall.doc 1 4' f--T"--- "."-,.., i ' i i i Z. i 1 i 1 1 i 1 P..-":3 AL_V j ir-'-':r '''. 711,1/7/1\''''-'N'. , 1 \ ‘,....i ! i i diat.........L..............J I.__ i j______; ,, ii ---,--5/ • A . . .....,4 f , Ai . 1--. , ''- i / 1 . I I . WITT-1111"1IWII 11 . , ill ti A.,. :,--.17 -...' ' ek,, ,0.2, ,,' / T-.: I 1 'i 7 \ .. i. , .1.L.,1 ,L....L...2—......_,.._.. ...i.---- / 1 -,,---- L......-__.1_.......L.ii„...,\. ri-f11-- -. 1 gt.4.,, ,.:::../ / 12,.....__,L-..,, "••••••-/ / ,.(• \ .; ......................., „........../. \\.\„..., , „„ I.; ,.1. 1 El opor. 1,1 ....;_-A4ta::' A`-1 ---- / /' \ \ 1 ..„.i. 1._ - .,-- '\ i'r----- 1 1 r---r- 1-----..1 ....\/' ,..k.,.)- ...,,,T1-7-1-7.----.-.,-.77.-- - r.:=7-r--.7-,-,-- -../ ..._.fi-----;,0 : ‘)-----L--L,- .,_1_, i I 1----- \ ,„," i 1 Lail— fii---ril c::: -- 1 i —.sr-, / , i , ... t.z.• L........k.:zi \ I , 1 ,., ;',----r--.., :, ..., /1 _._,.... 1"-------.1 1--------V__ 7-1.,---4----i '•-• / V i ,W*;',.?' -.TIT :C.:1 --I 4-- 1 ''' / --....,_,.. , / i , -4 \ 1_,,,...,..--- I / h . l' ''k '01 ..) 1 1-:7 ---FP lid i (-1• - L ••• ......, . ... --, . .441 1 , „--- \,...,-/---....—',. / /---,r---' 1 .. _....._.....4 1 „,,,,,,, \ ,„.„-::\---..„\.. 1 N,, i 1 t , : i ., TRloR-S— ;Di4 \ _,„,,,;,„••• 1 --.J._, , -----__<,,,__l___ -------\\ BR-to-RI-144 ILI — 1 i.Jri , i , ...\ „,,,,...,,,,„..:::"..\ r.,”,..„ rm--„,„, -7__....,„---__-- ......_t ex.B-1,ex.B-2 .- 1. -----)-4/ -.:::.- :111;:etix..r!"11.-- , ,... : , /......, \.. . i -.4 b".,4 rim rt:-.:1 -,-'''''. • i . , .... c ":"--1 LI JILL C:::•1 -..../ ..---< s-ii—....,,ii,- -7 ''' --' no 146 L I..ii .,., 'c b / \\ / ',--••----•-••••••z: c4 1,1-c..11 , , 1 / I • z ••••., ,•,..i.,....: . Lit.=k•-2:1.. ------7— ("Ns ,„, , , ! , CB- 7 I 2 u1:721 .:.,::?- r.--. k: , \ r \ \,..,,--3•---',-----:-1"--- \ _...„,„//./, ' ',....,..L_ _.........----.I----)\ i ! --) .... _„„ ........_ -• 1 _...._ 71 rii., ,_........ . ,....1 , 7,....., _„...r...—c \,„,, .---\---. ----11 \ T-\'''- ..„--- / 1 i \ \ I .,••• i \ \ \ \ , ‘, .i ' 1."--V"----4 i ---4---- )--------i i , ; 1 r i .. CB-2 to 0-2 p di 1 I 1 I 1 . 1 1 i -•-•- • .-- 1 ..4.- . \t..,..",•/ •/ ... .1_ _I ex.E-1---- - LI — -.Cf tO C-2 1 SR to R1-144 iii ... .........„........_.".- TN„sl. —11 r I ._c.K-1 --/r... . \ ,,,,-1,..._ii ). . _... I ex.1-1,ex.1-2 I i 1 •••••„/Thr 1 I t B-1 to g- - --i r ex.C1,C2 , I , . I MAGEE ROAD I • — -------\\\ , 1 ....."--.1 i_....._.— I 1 T jrR to Ft-S ‘111 Lt.. / ...........__I...._....„ , ...... 1 \ 1 j......-----------1 ii i 1 [ e0c.F-1 F-2 a ca ••-••• .. ,gc Ct5-1 to C-2 —I i." / ' i 1 1 0 ex.L-1 ' \ E cr ex.N1,ex.N2 . .,. ,i \ , • C.) __,-- --1 1 1 ) Ag )) 111 17 \ 8 i I ,, 1 1 : I 1 i ... I , ..- Wit,4411k ' • - ,) )" .. / 1 -, ---) (--- 1 / • // ,, . , .2...---, --: „ „., 1 Mei 1-1'-. 7Q \ - - 1 / • • - 7.. t.._______./ ' ./.--\-:2 • •*2... ----- i 1 \„..) II .... ,_ , ,, • ---7-i—\•---- \ 1 I.—m-1- I -------1,-----1 /I .-- .• • „ex-.C(t1 ex,..9,- 1 i / • i m....... I I , , , 11 • 1111 i •x 0-1\e*' 6-2, - " 111 i , , t • -- I t I 1 F•---------\,.../._ .,A-.., ----- -,- / in la , I 1 '------TR-tos R-S.-—11— • / 1 TRIto R-S ,1----h-r-' -a- \ / ,,'"\ \ 1---1 1 r--- / i ri / /A 1 ex.H-1,ex:-1+-2•-•:-i, i I „ O._ V \ , • 1 r'•-r ,,,,,, L----t-7/ ,,,,,,ji 03 - 32 Translational Zoning Exhibit Map ORDINANCE (0)03-32 AN ORDINANCE TRANSLATING THE ZONING FOR THE NEWLY ANNEXED AREA COMMONLY KNOWN AS AREA "B" FROM PIMA COUNTY ZONING DESIGNATIONS TO TOWN OF ORO VALLEY ZONING DESIGNATIONS AND AMENDING THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY ZONING MAP:AND REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; WHEREAS, On May 7, 2003,by Ordinance(0) 03-09,the Town of Oro Valley annexed the approximately 654.7 acres commonly known as Area`B"bounded on the west by Northern Avenue,on the north by Camino Cortaro and Rancho Catalina(north),on the east by the Coronado National Forest and Cobo Catalina Hills, on the south by Catalina Village and Westwood Look Resort and further described by the attached annexation map; and WHEREAS,the properties affected by this zoning translation encompasses a part of the annexed area comprising approximately 614.7 acres currently zoned Pima County CR-4 (Mixed Dwelling Type Zone), CB-1 (Local Business Zone), TR(Transition Zone) CB-2 (General Business Zone) SR(Suburban Ranch)and CR-1 ( Single Family Residence Zone); and WHEREAS,in accordance with State Statute ARS 9-471(L),the Town initiated a request to translate the zoning on the annexed area from its original Pima County zoning designation to comparable Oro Valley zoning designations; and WHEREAS,on September 2, 2003 at a duly noticed public hearing,the Town of Oro Valley Planning and Zoning Commission, in accordance with ARS 9-471(L), considered the translational zoning requests for the affected part of Area B as shown on the attached zoning map and recommended approval with conditions; and WHEREAS,the Oro Valley Town Council has considered the requested translational zoning and amendment to the Town zoning map at a duly noticed public hearing and finds it is consistent with the Town's General Plan and Ordinances. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY: SECTION 1: That the Town of Oro Valley Zoning Map be amended and the zoning designations be translated as indicated on the attached map, said districts being R-4 (Townhouse Residential District), RS (Residential Service), C-2 (Commercial District), R1-144 (Single-Family Residential District) and R1-36 (Single-Family Residential District)with conditions. The following table indicates and indexes the zoning translation with Exhibits indicating Parcel Numbers and Conditions of Zoning which are attached to and made a part of this Ordinance: . Ordinance (0) 03-32 Page 2 Case No. Pima County Oro Valley Parcel No. Conditions Zoning Zoning Exhibit Exhibit r OV9-03-21 CR-4 R-4 A-1 A-2 if OV9-03-08 TR R-S _ B-1 B-2 OV9-03-14 CB-1 C-2 C-1 C-2 OV9-03-22 SR R1-144 D-1 D-2 _ i OV9-03-23 CB-2 C-2 E-1 Not Applicable 6 OV9-03-12 TR R-S F-1 F-2 '9 OV9-03-13 SR RI-144 G-1 Not Applicable lb OV9-03-16 TR R-S H-1 H-2 if OV9-03-09 SR R1-144 I-1 I-2 1- OV9-03-17 CR-1 R1-36 J-1 J-2 IA OV9-03-18 CB-1 C-2 K-1 Not Applicable OV9-03-07 CB-1 C-2 L-1 Not lit _ Applicable f,C' OV9-03-10 CR-i R1-36 M-1 M-2 iy OV9-03-19 SR Ri-144 N-i N-2 ii OV9-03-06 TR R-S 0-1 0-2 iy OV9-03-15 SR R1-144 P-1 P-2 7 OV9-03-20 TR R-S _ Q-1 Q-2 SECTION 2: That all ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith, and the same are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict. SECTION 3: That this ordinance and the various parts thereof are hereby declared to be severable. If any section, sub-section, sentence, clause,work or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason,held to be unconstitutional, such holdings shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona,this 1st day of October, 2003. ATTEST: Katheryn E. Cuvelier, Town Clerk Paul H. Loomis,Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Mark Langlitz, Town Attorney Tint portion M Sections 28.99.30 and 39.Towrh4 12><cthtti THENCE;.ninon WeedlX along the East-Weil One-owrtar(Ewe 1/4) TRIM Eagerte 9•� of-way Me d CA1 1.3 list East iCdoon and Salt River t26.3 h.Pine Artoan4 de ire w fatter tow of said Section JO to he Northeast comer of Lot 4 f Aft follow. County, CATALIIA VILLAGE 9t�MSION N0.2,w recorded h Beak 9 of Yaps No thi g and Mori the pooh LYw of cold heTOOOrdinates 93, R the rind PNts at Page 7S,Perna Carty Recorder'.Office.Pins County. Northeast corner of the parcel oerwwd to the iLMI Of ORO VALLEY by BDOrM119 et file Northeast Maw of vERDE w►TAIJNA TOwttOUIEA M� Resanhtfdn No.(R)90-Dt1t w recorded h Book 23 of Yaps and Rota at Page 34.Pins Canty THENCE Sarthsne dung the Wad Une Recorder'.Moe,Reno County.Minna al.nq tint.Eastrly line of sale Lot B 1•the 8autl1 oflea to the South Lnedd sap R n(N)90-30 asold OrdInteos(R)90-50,rintimin 90.00 Une at said Lot Et THENCE S 1r4/'30r W..MrN the East Lie of geld%EWEE CATNJ4A TEE Vilestaly,eking said South Lkw at Lot 8.o Agana.of 217.9B THEME Etiolate along the Smith r1ih t-a .cy Ike of CIwNO tO�JSE3 awe along tinsSovMt Lie of the parcel.,n d to the bet.more or ii to the jai a ofIS CORTAR0 and alongce neradd Lot TOVINq p South Line ofR..oirten(R)90-30 to the East LW d and Ordnance ce ORO VALLEY by Ordnance No.90-0.s dtelaioe of 3/0.01 Act to the THENCE s 513'33*K 00 leaf triere or Welk to the Northwest corner North d Lot 7 of end GTAUNA VILLAGE SJBOIV2SIpf NO.2; THENCE oontiew Lss rtx sap South o/- AA(�/htt of-w1wyyr Si.of CATALNA SHADOWS BOULEVARD awarding toCORTARO and the Eastrty pre of sot vary sine of C. RANCHO CATALONA w recorded h Book 23 of traps and Plats at Prigs South right-of-soy or Me 50.Plena County Reordr's Offlas,Pine County.Arteaho; THENCE w•atarty to the West Line d said Lot S.said Point Whoa (oaks the oho Ming the South Urn of the pawl amend to the T0t01 212.7Z feet South of the Northwest caner of said Lot 91 OF ORO VALLEY Cy Ordnance No.94),to the Easterly right-of-ray the THENCE along mold North rlyyit-of-way Noe of CATALNA SHADOWS T►Q/CE continue M�tany 30 Not more or less,to the Wssfarty d eo��rf� mar BOULEVARD and along the South Lkw o sop pared aneowd by right-of-soy One of 110Rf1EAN AbE]a11E aocordtp to IAEVA ESIsANA,w THE North Cap saki Easterly NM-of-toy Ile,carp the Ordnwas No.90-9 the laaoeMq oounwp monded in Book Bo 28 of Yaps b of odd and ate at Page 90.Ptra Canty Easterlyy lee d Aninallo.9 the L1 os N4,to w North of rEROE EASTERLY dap a 945.00 foot radius curet for an no distaio.d Recorder's Clines,Pine County.Arizona CATAtt34. TOWNHOUSES Cot15ES ce recorded h Boon 23 d Yap and Plat at 134.!!9 Net to a poem of tongernc7t Prigs 34.Pins Donny Recorder's oak..Pima Canty, Ancona.•aid THENCE Northerly.along said wwlrty rtEM-af-ray line of NORTHERN point being on the South lire of the parcel anemia to the Mow OF THENCE S 7013 30'E/50.17 Act to a Print of curvatureMEN MENU(to the contrt+.of CHAPAtA P E.said point Oekp a ORO VALLEY by Orakwrae 90-9, projection an the right-of-way Ike of NORTHER.AVENUE THENCE Eaalrlyr along a 4fy3.00 foot radius arm far an arc distance according toHA fI Westerly., ESTATES,as monied inBook 19 of Yaps and THENCE Etiology, said North Lie of Yf7t0E CATN11A of 345 98 Net to a point of rover.atrvrittret Plate at Pogo 20.Pima County Sward r.Mos.Pima County,Anson% TationsOUSES and South Lino of void Ordinance 90-9 to the THENCE dap a B71i00 lent goalies curve for at arc financePORT OF THENCE lX ailing said Wit.. r f-wey 4e d NORTHERN of 353.47 Net to a Pont of tangency; AVENUE.to tie centerline ofMAIEL90s1 STREET according to add HAHEISON ESTATES. THEME S S91311'01'E 300.00 test to 0 point of armature; THQfCE westerly.along sop.entente.tS.00 lest to a projection of THENCE Easterly dap a 1.218.00 foot roaEw curve for an ao dilates BBOONI T A T book i 4 NORTH l Ab£)AJE co p b of 401.85 hest to a point of compound arwbre Yap grid P1vts a t Pops 2b, (v � r ''i`..:` Plow County Reoordls One,Pine Canty. ..�1 ..�.' (?i ±`'`'., THENCE Easterly and Northeasterly along a 25.00 foot wen br an x Mtmrhq Y��''' ;;'' r } �`,y � r,'. era distance d 39.71 Leif b o THEME Naraerl f,�ri w= • •` k 'S. port d reveres curvature an the x p sold Wtsetert t-af-wey One pxojeotich►b n.;• ,, %'.:,: ....:r{ rf r�;e Jr'tiir�♦ t'a`k,y'.� wesirlr of- kw d RNeCfO GTAIJNA AVENUE b the Northeast corrher d aid BOfsTA ACRES; j u:.;r s ;+ a�: RANC10 TAtIlIA w rwoorderd h Boole 23 d Yore and Plots at r., THENCE Ewtaty,dap the Easterly V projection of the North Lied ' 1f,�38.Pkra Canty Rsoordee*Ones.Pea County,Artcorw; said BO/ATA ACRES.moo lest to the Westerly right-of-array to of said r' v ��}"ic• RA1?hCtO NORTHERN AIENUE,said One being 30.00 het West d and paroled wMh 1{� `; (► p.THEME Northerly a 402.00 foot radios moue dap odd westerly f J L , the Earl Lie d the Northeast Ore-Ouorler ) 'right-of-way line d GTALJNA Al£PA>E and �hqq aid (NE 1/4 of end Section 4� %sanely line of and paint annexed to T0MN Of ORO a°..LEY by q U Ordinance Nw 90-9,a Olean•of 213.01 feet to the Southeast Dotter d Lot 132 d sold RANCHO CATALINA; THENCE Norawly awhq said Apnt-of-war His.b the Easterly t ,,, � pro)octfon Lew CASAS LIOAS ADDITION BLOM 1 as ° •-11....•- L}' ,';Di' �f• ' recorded In Boo 30 d Yaps and Plats at •', ... 'r:•.. N,r. THENCE S 97.24'0l'E.Wog sold South Lied Dodos,8773 at Pugs Pogo 98.Pkrha County i;'r`' ... 1617,a OYtaae of 60.99 Net to the Southwest comer of Let 208 d ftsO°rd•r'• Pima County.Adieux y :;:c;•;'t^�Wu:.:::.:.,:= said RANCHO CATA INA; c i THENCE Westerly.clang odd Easterly projection.15.00 feet b the • THENCE .aid South lire of the offal awned to T011N OF ono Southeast comer of said CASAS L11DAS AOOnlON clean;1,sold paint • VALLEY by No.No.90-9,awl along the South Line of said being on Ui•a•• y right-of-my One of said NORTHERNArQ1UE; RANCHO CA/AL/IA the following courses THENCE Northerly.slang said Westerly rlWt-d-way tie of NORTHERN THENCE S 111111•o9'E 135.29 feet to on ariWe point: AVE?AArE to a tee 1 lest South of and panne with the North Lie of said Nortwast Ore-poorer(1E 1/4)of Section 35; THENCE S fl 24'35'E 170.31 Net to an angle point; THEME Eastanx wog sold paned tine.a distance of 15.00 feet,to a THENCE S 7734'19'E 1431/Nat to at at91•point; Si.30.00 foot 1Msut of and parasol with the East Lie of sold Narteost a..--Ouartr(NE 1/4X THENCE N 9015O OO'E 140.00 feet to an angle pant; THENCE Northerly.along sold por'dsi to.,a diet..of 27.50 lest to MAP OF TERRITORY TO BE ANNEXED THENCE S 98'32'10'w 170.49 Alt to an angle pant; aft ore- South of1a/t4dkpaned with the Northof sold Lin TO THE TOWN OF ORO YALLE'Y THENCE N 84116'41'E 117.46 feet to at angle point IliDoCE Westerly,dais said Sofsa Si..,O a distERN A Io taco feet.b ANNEXATION 2002 - PARCEL B THE?10E 8 eo51'0�2'w/7.41 Net to an angle twat: the Mweten r�ht_d-way Ms d said NORTHERN AVENUE; THENCE S 03•28'06 E 138.53 feet to an angle point: THENCE Nart ertyt along said westerly right-of-way to.of NORTHERN A1rEMJE to the South AqM-d-roy line of MALEE ROAD,sold lin bang THEDICE N 91700'00'E 110.44 feet to the Southeast axnsr of add 75.00 lest South of and pads nth to North Line of odd Northeast RANCHO CATALNA,said pokot also being the Southeast comer of sold Onr-Quarter(NE 1/4)of Section 3d; LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF pawl amiad to TOM OF ORO vALJ1Y by Ordhnwro.No.90-9.said Pon Wing Ir t p an o East e of sold Mhs Section 25; THENCE iwtyt dSouth og.aid right-of-way line 30 test.more or SECTIONS 25, 26, 35, & 36 OF lees.to a line 75.00 net West of and parole with to East Line of the T-12-S, R-13-E, G.& S.R M., THENCE Souo«+y.law said East Una of Section 25,to the Southeast One-water(SE 1/4)of sold Section 26; •.75_. r. PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA Southeast owner of sold Section 23; THENCE Southerly.along the East Una of sold Section 38, the gTh t-of-sarthrty. sold ponds ins.sop Westely pro)��ine being ths y 1 d ��i hg the N erly ike- Ndoy Sis A CAH;to to of L EarteAy r1gM-of-woy tins d fitST AYE?tJE 000aA�tq b T�T]UC►<LS t+s Northherl rt¢H-of-way ens d CA11Rq OORiARO ooar�hq toas:woorded h Book 14 of Yaps aid Plats at Page i7,PMo Canty FAI HArEJN LACE,w handed h Book 14 of Yaps and Plate of Page Reoa'dr'•OfBw.Pine City,Arto na,a distance of 2.623.39 feet, SO.Pimp Canty Recorder's Offoe,Ptrne Cant Arizona.saw line dso .,`s more or nos, to the Lost Ore-Coats(E 1/4)owner of said Section being tie easterly projector of the South LYe of the Soros arasssd to •;4•.:'.'.,c 38; the WON OF(IRO VALLEY by Ordinance No.931 THENCE Weeta lyt dare .Eart-taset One-Otrark(Ewe 1/4)Section PENCE Eagerly,b ig said Wwetrty projection,to the Easton/ Enginrrnng and Environmental Consultants,Inc'. One of sold 9.,.tlua tin 39 to the center of sold Suction 38; right-of-way line of t1pRTHETat AVENUE,sold point Hip the Southwest E F y comer d saki Ordnance No,113; 4086 EEC 202016 TvC5011.A 8lA 007ia f �-4 2 -t 2 e BOOK_ PACE • • I)! i ,--f-r"'"---.:kii 0 '•••••es;P:',g,"' ; ;:i i i ; ,•• :1 i , ,1 -:...ti,„„.••':;•,..,kt.----17 ! ; '. i ; !..'4,:::.... I,1, .I...(,.a_.f ..if r TIL:_..-_.._1...-._.i f,.,''•; i..3:l.6,....'i_..:.•._,..L.:_:. ._yl.......i..t... ..• ........ , Ss�t 1.-'., t �i• � •-;�'/ ! ... ,�1.„.•,',...—�'•. ." 1 ww�L es. ` 7_. 1 •i.•rik r l 1 j"' ..d�or+Ai+tlEI e M i� ' �ls. O ''ORQ._.V.AU Y•.; f - r, of ,. THE TtOWN ' , `, / ` -e' �Er L10i40auE Laws OF pc 7C�M•GF 0�0 YAILfY ..•—•:. i . , .`_:,.„ .I `, ; ! S' ,N *- 'v.�s'%'' taosJPI oar atA1E arts OF 1) row cr ono vAutr �ti �j:-:;"x+` -• i_ _ r ;: i l�, / l •�h .i' r'+ _ 1.PAUL K LOOM S.MAYOR Oi THE TOM/Or ow VALLEY. , .1.... 7 •h; ri' � ,a :',-• •:••:.,t, '` ;,..M..... .� `'� A► • ._.._..,. A CDRTFY THAT TlfS O AM ACCIMiA1E NAP OF .,;,....1..f Ti..„..,,,,--"---- r •n,._.�,,r,:` ., . ' ` : 1!E7F7tlMTdffAIMCeD1 T!ETOmelOFORO g1EY.�i ';.._.... 1'?'§r_ry}•-:t:' • i ': • y:'' ,.;'' ; j ANQONi1 "Marley dfaNMi[E MO OF THE OIIDIIIANCES OF i r - ii < i. r rA'.::i 1. �-^"`i �'' t•C f •j,.l. TIE TOYNI OF ONO VALLEY. . .1\ 4 �. ti c re3II ••4 V. J.f 1^' ,�„�,7}Yr�+._�:_" •ra`.:i � f j�.. ..y 'w•t�'ti"''' .,...„1.:... . ..' ,^'. .t ... Q�� 1 i ! ';m• ,i r +"j.;;ttl:- r r. _ ...i. ...`�.'.....-........_..... !...•..:_. !.C....,. ...._. r NAM PAUL M.LOOIII6 \ . , . '...I-•••-.4.-••••`•1 ... ' . I. f ........- • ATTEST: 1oM�I CLERK: KATMtY►I E.a,viTt • • t ?) { :. ......... ..._..._._....... ......� _ ._ .... RECORDING DATA: ....... ... ,. is_. ! j S STALE OF ARIZONA) KG.M0. Q I t r: • f ` - COUNTY OF PIMA ) fES 1,4 : . { i 'DC TEQUEST OF THE ..• i - t _ FEED FOR • }• t .... VALLEY. RECORD O DOS__DAYOF PLATS 02 AT OF ONO • r I-`• c_• ••••' IN BOOK OF MAPS TS AT -• is . _........... I• t r :" i_ t' `•. 1:/; r UTIE=MY NAND AND SEAL.THE DAY MID WAR ADM( •. { _,. • ., ../r., ••• i ....;.._._-,1,1 ,. MITTEN. :. y i _ '..._.-_.-... • • F.AMU RO0100UEL PIMA COUNTY RECORDER � ~ .�.... !!".-i 'i 4SI 3 ,.Y !„•''...,,_ry)'wrY';�'..i,i.,'i9 }r'v i' -, ; �t : ' ; t , ' ,..-r ! y._ MAP OF TERPJTORY TO BE ANNEXED � r ;... + i i , ,.. ; : • • '„; ,�� TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY f 1 . } } / RE map' " •4 ALLEY .. ''.. • `� �bF ram: :�o o� oRer v : ., . ---�.; , .;;:_�1;K., ANNEXATION 2002 — PARCEL B ` 1 i t ,y r ii Ij a .. ._.. . f., i A ,.... {, s:.,._.;a:,,,• `' • LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF SECTIONS 25, 26, 35, & 36 OF pA + T-12—S. R-13—E, G.& S.R M., �_•_;�r PIMA COUNTY. ARIZONA TOTAL AREA OF ~� ANNEXATION ,a L. 1 654.71 ACRES •,,,,,,;le.. Cir Engineering and Environmental Consultants,Inc. • 44116 6.It.1LIRIML RD. • EEC 202016 lTICtION.AURORA 66T1S CYO•-6Y1-41116 1 of 2 • BOOK PACE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY OUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: October 1,2003 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Robert Conant,Planner II SUBJECT: ORDINANCE (0) 03-32 (EXHIBITS H-1 AND H-2),OV9-03-16, TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY EQUIVALENT FOR THE ANNEXED AREA,BOUNDED ON THE NORTH APPROXIMATELY 'A MILE SOUTH OF MAGEE ROAD, ON THE EAST BY ORACLE ROAD, ON THE WEST BY THE TERMINUS OF NORTHERN AVENUE AND ON THE SOUTH BY CATALINA VILLAGE: TRANSLATION ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY TR (TRANSITIONAL ZONE) TO THE TOWN'S R-S (RESIDENTIAL SERVICE DISTRICT) DESIGNATION FOR PARCEL NUMBERS; 225-512-690 AND 225-512-700 BACKGROUND: -)n May 7, 2002, the Town of Oro Valley annexed the above referenced area as part of a larger annexation of _and called "Area B" (Ordinance No. (0) 03-09). The attached maps identify the location of the area and the current and proposed zoning designations. In accordance with State Statutes, the Town is required to change or "translate" the zoning on the annexed properties from its original zoning designation to the closest comparable Oro Valley zoning designation. Section 9-471(L) of the Arizona Revised Statutes (ARS) states: "A city or town annexing an area shall adopt zoning classifications which permit densities and uses no greater than those permitted by the county immediately before annexation. Subsequent changes in zoning of the annexed territory shall be made according to existing procedures established by the city or town for the rezoning of land." SUMMARY: The Pima County zoning designation for the area is Transitional Zone (TR) and the most similar Oro Valley zoning district is Residential Services (SR). The parcel abutting Oracle Road is developed with a doctor's office, and the rear parcel is vacant. OVERVIEW OF THE PROPOSED TRANSLATIONAL ZONES: Pima County TR(Transitional Zone) The Pima County zoning designation for this area is Transitional Zone (TR), a low intensity commercial and residential district. R - TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 3 Oro Valley RS (Residential Services) The Town's RS district permits offices, low intensity commercial, multi and single family residential uses. Within Pima County zoning, a 34 foot building height is permitted. Conversely, a 24 foot building height is mandated within the OVZCR. In order to provide for existing development and compatibility with surrounding uses, a maximum height of 30 feet has been specified in the translational zoning ordinance. GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE: The proposed zoning designation limits uses to a less intensity than the General Plan Land Use designation would allow. The General Plan designation for the area is Neighborhood Commercial. The translational zoning will not be in conformance with the General Plan; however, State law requires the Town to translate the zoning to its closest equivalent. NOTIFICATION: All property owners within the annexed area have been notified of this proposed translational zoning and the properties were posted in accordance with Town and State statutes. To date, staff has not received any omments. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ACTION: The Planning and Zoning Commission on September 2, 2003 voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the translational zoning. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Town Council approve the translational zoning from Pima County Transitional Zone to the Town's Residential Service District, subject to the condition listed in Exhibit H-2. The conditions have been included within Ordinance (0) 03- 32. After the Commission meeting, staff discussed the need to propose a building height that is more compatible with the County standards and will be compatible with surrounding uses. For this reason, a maximum height of 30 feet has been included within the translational zoning ordinance. SUGGESTED MOTION: The Town Council may wish to consider the following suggested motion: I move to adopt Ordinance (0) 03-32, translating the zoning from Pima County to the Town of Oro Valley zoning districts for Area"B" as annexed by Ordinance (0) 03-09 adopted April 7, 2003. F:\OV\OV 9\2003\9-03-16\REX.TC.RPT.doc TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Pane 3 of 3 Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Zoning Map F:\OV\OV9\2003\9-03-16\REX.TC.RPT.doc • . /---,------r--• ; \ 1 1 t. i,j! ,i ; ; .. , . , • i ; ; , .. .. , „ , \\\\\\ i 14-- CT.,,,/ -'1', 1r ..., '-i./ ‘,,,',..•. N.. '... , , . . . , . ... = / ! 1 .....•' '. I ..1.-.i _ .! I ! !.. . ••••...! i./ I •••••••! i ' I• -.,..„..---1 , - ,. „.„--,-,f--,-.,,ili :i : ...., ,...L H I 1 I!id 1;1 1 ‘.. .' ': '..' ,./ ''. ).-.... '• "-- ' ' 1 t.,/,.,........L.L.... ...,.......: ,.,.• . .. % / ; ,„ .s.... t . .. i ;. .•,,' \ i ! I Li.L' 11..111..1.L. .1_1..... LL. , i_.1- ----, ..--;n•FT.F.-:1 r... ; . . .. . \•-. _i. --c .. - , = 1 • ' : .. . I = -17-1.77-TrTT-,n i, ),........ : , i -,...:, unii.... r•:, ...„, ...„ ....•• ,,-- s •14, i4-17A/91-04724-ti LI:. ,,_./ ,-• •-,....._. ! ri. ,list: ,j1 ;, _r 1 r... i 0 9703. & .,.. . . .. . , . , I, 1 . ', .• -:„ ,i-c.::-/;1,-_-1.,,,,-,-,,..-.- '• -'• 1 •-•,\ , I .. : I A• ..', ', ••••••]. 111 ( - , ----7• •• 4.7:71.7. 1...- - Is- .,, ... '• • . I i . .. \....., ,..„_.,... ..e......„. ,,-.7:......,, L , ,.-••:•,, ,.......!,.. ...! ... ..r.-----, ...--. A....._._••--).,------i---- = . --Fr 1-', .--i . .' , ...--;•. c ! , .. .--1* ___..-- 1; : ' . ' ' / 1=7-11-.--:-A!-- i-:.•7•J I i ..- -' •-'" , •-' i ' ••• '--------j. t-' = ,i,,,,,,,,,::pkIV..'io•ev, L.---I rfir,1;i I::...1 .. ' f ,,,La,c:!!,...14....,.4.c;ft...i: -'• L----..—.1..,-....- . I •-•----1 .• I 1;""-." ;• .i...' O ... 1 --------1„.•,,, 1--------1 i -------"'------------- ---:.' ._ Tiii,----or-4.,roir,L .... ..\ \-- ....,.....::-. \,................, .. 1----z.!-::-....L ..., i ,- , . T- a OV9-03-08 ...:._-.1., T—I---" 7-- li cr - , .7-0 ow.,I?:.2 2 li-Lif rill 1 I '•••".:17 ..\•''...••••• '. '.......` ‘,,....' OV91.09.17 . 1 1.............,-„,A .; \ ••-• ! 1 g ',.....-7-----'1.---- ' IT . ----"r s' . .• • i 1.. ... i z 1.1-.i 1! !----I r----i/ . . • • , , .. ..-- ; . 1 . 1 .. • i ,.... _./._ __,.L i Win.7-11 -111, L-... /____ It-Thi - ----; ' • , • --,. ..- : y -- ---.( 1 1 ---f •'1- 1 1 ...; ---1 k.•,.1-i 0 9-03- 3 L---• '•-•-••-? t- \ , ; .•• -• •... i .A---. .- ':. A \, 1..----L---L--' ..',..7-•-— ' ••••• L-----j-__ i i I ""p •••i pi i ...I , L.,,,,-, -....d-; „, .:,....- ..... . ..-' 1.-.., ,---r---\, \ ,,..1,..,)-----k: ,s.‘.."7---1-,. \ . . f _ -----••• ; ‘ • 1 i- -l• '-''J; -- ••- i• ', •• \-- -. ; / ; \ % 1. 1 \ ; . ; .• ; : 1 -------. I.r_LIT71.1.;all i : ., : i ! ; :- ,. •••• '. .• : \ , 1 •. -. __.----4, !-- i 1 ••- i 1 i I :t 1 • ..• l..1 1......I OV9-03223 '....97-. -, L--- .__,-1.--11 t, ' ---,1-I- _ove-oali 8-- I t OV9-03-09 ..t.., ..,.,.• , . . 1 .: . T I ..........i _.T. I 9 T I -.1411 __ ______4 i di ,, ,.; 1 i ', 1 1 6 .,,, 1 1 I , I I, , _.... ... MAGEE ROAD ••--------------\(, , 1 t i ! ,., , . 1 ! 1 4 1 1----- •: i .• ., . 1 , ' L . i 0/19-03 12 ri .................j 2„...- , . t-- .. ......_ i i '''' 0 ---; ...... t- i 1 ,_.,......, : I Lci....,J I ' , • 1 ------ ; .. e • I I 1 --- ! \ i !-------1 1.' OV 9-0 3-0 7 -----....._.] -----1-7.-,...... I 1.7.....1.;.:--.-- OV9.03.19 , . \ 1 \ ---------1 i 1 • ... . .. . •- i . \ ., \ \----- !I 1:, •-• I , i I (..) •,. .. ----_ I ,1---.1 ....----------------,:___i_J......._..--- -- .....- ..•- _, . . ____, I , E-1 I J 5 . j --, . .,- .., ,„, .,- = L .-....-----.----,---- z 7 --------..- --i I •( ' f. ii... ! .. /,' %.—•". i • Ir - ..„. \ 0 , , - -, '., ., ....-, ... ! ..- , •,.. \ Y . ; • ,... .., ____L____ \ -----1 Is ‘.. \ L „...\-- i ,,,...„..-- .,, I 1 i LI 1 i \( 1--...._ IL-- I L.. 9030. X _ _1, \ A,. \;•-• :•:••• \ L___,...,. : .• • ' ' 1 /••••, ...; ' -1 : „ i i i - --1 - --I 11 i i „ , , A \ .:,..---•"_:. •• ' : -Li ---1 , 1 I 1 ? / \ i , , ,9-03-1 \ i \------\`-_-:: •••••---\ .- ',„j„........__: 1. ,,..... ___1_,.. . -----t-,-- \.• , 4•111 , > /I .,i 1 1 9 ova-o3-p 6 .---,/ ',. . ....„....____ --- . -.. - . ... • - is ',. , .... - \ .......• , i ! I ; 1 , :., ..,,. ,", _ • •,•• ,.. • i i 1 i .5 , ...... - ...• 1 1 1 ).,,,,. , ___._, ‘,--- ..,...--••,..„- \ ; , • ; ; ., , i ., ,"\ ../:•-••, ,, / ,\ ...: 11 •-.1 .../.. ..- , , • . 1 ' ; 5 i t ...- .•••-•../ / \--,....:---:'..7..•I __.---- = .‘......,„ ..... ..-: . ___..., . 1 ----s--,---- • If r 94 3•2 -----•••• I/ ;I \ \ \''.• -''-, .•., \ _....• ----1 ---1 --1---1- -----rt- \ --..,----\ / 7.- i I i ,..„., ‘. ....-•.-- 1. , .1.••••.., "1 i ------- ' 2/..-\ \ , • / r 1 1 ---11 11-'- L..___1 ill -- : _....,....A . \..... „--- ....'-----\ •-.. '., i , ', : 5 r /,, \ . / / • .„_•,- I ,_ 1 „.....- ,• \ , . . : i ! / \ .,-/ \ N 1 ,- , , „........ _.,,\1-7 . k 1 r , ,_...........L__,__;.... / .,‘,... \.,. \..., --"" 7--1, I ....., s . A., %. • I 1 / • , L .1----4.----- s \ =s, .. "• ----- —--- 1 1 I i 1 ... .. 'I .....' 111 .....••• .. ., --'''''' !-------77-1- , 1 . ! 1 . 1 - ., ---1 1 '.! + 1.--. - , . .,. i , , , i i ..- .1 ; \ , I •..! \ ‘,.. / ., . . ..,., ..-- i - • 9-03-0 j i I A: : O II-- i 1 ‘.__s___;......:-1...._., ..._--- ...• ., ,...••• ......- \ , \/ N. \...._ ...........-••,-, \ 1, I i ! = --- 1 I 1..--- . - •, • L....L.....I1 __._•._.1.__ 11 '•,,.,),. ,- - .. -'• II •. * ...., *, •' Pm". .. :-• . I I i 1 Z L % 1 i .__.....1 1. I. _____,. IT_.....,.. .._.., , __..,........... _. ....,.....: ,.,.. _•:::____. i.;-;:ileienwiresswes,< .\\,-.. Nis......- \\,../ .__ .....___. I , I i i 1 I'. i V9-03-0 I 1 ', i t . . ... ..j L.I I 1._i_ .....i_o_ 13 11,, • -1/4 • - . .• ,..' Y ...___.________._ ......— I I 1 •••• •••. '• ----- .'!. ! ,...... TII. V9- --, . i " .-' •\ '; ; ; .• .•••‘,.',..:•• ....,\ [fir, i•-•,.A.1,4 •..-. k__; I . / • ,i , • 1 1-- -,,,,_••'•--:::‹ \ \ ; ! , C.a. , .-;I ;St •••-•,..,:::1-.' I / . y .. • . ' Translational Zoning Location Map i 1 1 i : 1 A � `SgP eC G ij C �GP0 IBRDGE DR zcr z : O � Q cr a 1xi 0 z ! z Z N' 1 < Wcc Z =z W HARELSON ST ? 73 � RD o O� . JF yr v 'A W SUFFOLK DR Pima County TR Zoning z to Oro Valley R-S Zoning W CHAPALA DR i ,.,,,,ww.,,,w.—..,-»...-...w.....,w„ .,--. m E DESERT n 1,...._.i- < 0 a 11 Q N PALM Dire W Z ,�P A t2J * 40 Jay NDES' Z z PAO' - o xi �5 x MCP' z SO4°- < WLO OV9 - 03 -- 1. 6 Transla. tianal. Zoning 1/417 EXHIBIT H-1 TO ORDINANCE NO. (0) 03-32 OV9-03-16 TRANSLATION ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY TR(TRANSITIONAL ZONE) TO THE TOWN'S R-S (RESIDENTIAL SERVICE DISTRICT)DESIGNATION FOR PARCEL NUMBERS 225-512-690 AND 225-512-700 EXHIBIT H-2 TO ORDINANCE NO. (0) 03-32 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OV9-03-16 1. The subject parcel will be subject to a 30 foot building height and no building shall exceed 2 stories in height. AFFIDAVIT - PUBLICATION STAI`EOFARIZONA) :ss. COUNTY OF PIMA ) K AREN BR I GRAM being first duly sworn, deposes and says that (he) (she) is the Legal Advertising Manager of THE DAILY TERRITORIAL, a daily newspaper printed and published in the County of Pima, State of Arizona, and of general circulation in the City of Tuc- son, County of Pima, State of Arizona and elsewhere, and the hereto attached 0V9-03-16 PULL I C NOT I CE was printed and published correctly in the regular and entire issue of said THE 4 d DAILY TERRITORIAL for issues: that was first made 10th SEPTEMBER 03 on the day of 10th 20 and the last publication thereof was made on the day of SEPTEMBER 03 20. ; that said publication T; lli,.q each of the following dates, to-wit: Request of TUwN of O O VALLEY Daily Territorial By �.. % er." Subscrib d an s on o b ore ' - day of 10. --- • SEPTEMBER 20 ----, 03 . \ i N a4 �, c'fY��iit�ate r gfr+�f t f A4 6orla 1 rime County -1 My Commission Expireft. y Dailey McCombs,/ �} Expires June " 15,2007 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING dEFORE THE ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL In accordance with ARS 9-462 and Section 3-111 of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Re- vised,NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FOR RE- CENTLY ANNEXED PROPERTY BEFORE THE ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL IS HEREBY GIVEN: TIME:at or after 7:00 p.m.on WEDNESDAY,OCTOBER 1,2003 PLACE:Oro Valley Town Hall,Council Chambers 11000 North La Canada DriveOro Valley,Arizona SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING—ORDINANCE(0)03- ,0V9-03-16,TRANSLA- TIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY EQUIV- ALENT FOR THE ANNEXED AREA,BOUNDED ON THE NORTH APPROXIMATE- LY_MILE SOUTH OF MAGEE ROAD,ON THE EAST BY ORACLE ROAD,ON THE WEST BY THE TERMINUS OF NORTHERN AVENUE AND ON THE SOUTH BY CATALINA VILLAGE: TRANSLATION ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY TR(TRANSITIONAL ZONE)TO THE TOWN'S R-S(RESIDENTIAL SERVICE DISTRICT)DESIGNATION FOR PAR- CEL NUMBERS;225-512-690 AND 225-512-700. The property was annexed to the Town on May 7,2003 and,in accordance with State Statutes,the Town is required to change or"translate"the zoning on annexed proper- ties to the closest comparable zoning district within the new jurisdiction. Members of the public are invited to attend this meeting and will be given an opportu- nity to speak. An agenda for the meeting will be made available 24 hours prior to meeting time. Should you have any questions regarding this matter,please contact Robert Conant,Planner II,at(520)229-4800 or bconant@orovalley.net. /s/Bayer Vella,AICP Senior Planner Pub:The Daily Territorial September 10,2003 Req:Town of Oro Valley pnov9-03-16 kb NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL In accordance with ARS 9-462 and Section 3-111 of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised, NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FOR RECENTLY ANNEXED PROPERTY BEFORE THE ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL IS HEREBY GIVEN: TIME: at or after 7:00 p.m. on WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 1, 2003 PLACE: Oro Valley Town Hall, Council Chambers 11000 North La Canada Drive Oro Valley, Arizona SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING-ORDINANCE (0) 03- , OV9-03-16, TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY EQUIVALENT FOR THE ANNEXED AREA, BOUNDED ON THE NORTH APPROXIMATELY % MILE SOUTH OF MAGEE ROAD, ON THE EAST BY ORACLE ROAD, ON THE WEST BY THE TERMINUS OF NORTHERN AVENUE AND ON THE SOUTH BY CATALINA VILLAGE: TRANSLATION ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY TR(TRANSITIONAL ZONE) TO THE TOWN'S R-S (RESIDENTIAL SERVICE DISTRICT) DESIGNATION FOR PARCEL NUMBERS; 225-512-690 AND 225-512-700. The property was annexed to the Town on May 7, 2003 and, in accordance with State Statutes, the Town is required to change or"translate"the zoning on annexed properties to the closest comparable zoning district within the new jurisdiction. Members of the public are invited to attend this meeting and will be given an opportunity to speak. An agenda for the meeting will be made available 24 hours prior to meeting time. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Robert Conant, Planner II, at (520) 229-4800 or bconant ,)orovalley.net. iii,/i////'(-„, Posted: 9-9-03 Bayer Vella,AICP Time: 9 : 0 0 am Senior PlannerBy: sg F:\OV\OV9\2003\9-03-16\REZ.TC.NOTICE.doe MINUTES ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION OCTOBER 01,2003 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11,000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER 7:02 p.m. ROLL CALL • PRESENT: Paul Loomis, Mayor Paula Abbott, Council Member Dick Johnson, Council Member Bart Rochman, Council Member EXCUSED: Werner Wolff, Vice Mayor PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Loomis led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS Police Chief Danny Sharp reviewed the upcoming meetings and events. CALL TO AUDIENCE Helen Dankwerth, 11515 N.Flying Bird Drive, expressed concerns that references to Mixed Use Neighborhood (MUN) designations may still remain in the General Plan update. Bill Adler, 10720 N. Eagle Eye Place, expressed concerns regarding temporary signs that are placed in the public right of way. Richard Anemone, 13987 N. Honey Tree Place, questioned why the Oro Valley Police Officers Association was denied the right to circulate petitions in order to place an initiative on the ballot regarding a"Meet and Confer"measure. He asked that they be allowed to gather petitions, forward the matter to the voters, and then if the voters approve the initiative, the legalities can be addressed. Sharon Brown, 960 W. Silver Spring Place, asked for clarification on the completion of the Town's road projects. She also presented the Council with pictures depicting the status of Moore Road at Copper Spring Trail and illegal construction traffic along Copper Spring Trail. Dan Krueger, 11,000 N. La Canada Drive, President of the Oro Valley Police Officers Association, thanked those Council members who agreed to meet with the Association to discuss the "Meet and Confer"issue. He asked that the Council place the item on a future 10/01/03 Minutes,Town Council Regular Session 2 Agenda for consideration or that the Town Attorney"step out of the way" and let the voters decide. He also asked that the Mayor agree to meet with the officers to discuss the issue. Carmen Trevizo, 11,000 N. La Canada Drive,Treasurer of the Oro Valley Police Officers Association, stated that their goal is to get a long term contract set up with the Association and the Town. She explained that there are morale problems within the Police Department due to the perception that all officers are not being treated equally and issues seem to be treated at random or arbitrarily. She asked that the Council revisit the"Meet and Confer" issue. Council Member Johnson directed staff to look into the comments received by Ms. Dankwerth regarding MUNs and by Mr. Adler regarding temporary signage. Council Member Abbott directed staff to look into case law supporting the decision to not allow the "Meet and Confer"issue to be placed on the ballot. 1. CONSENT AGENDA MOTION: Council Member Johnson MOVED to APPROVE the Consent Agenda with the exception of Item G. Council Member Rochman SECONDED the motion. Motion carried,4—O. A. Minutes—9/8/03; 9/15/03; 9/17/03 B. Library Monthly Activity Report—August 2003 C. Reappointment of Bob Horn to the Municipal Property Board of Directors with term set to expire September 30, 2006 D. Appointment of Richard Tracy to the Public Safety Public Retirement System Local Board E. Report on emergency repairs to water Well F-1 F. Resolution No. (R)03-83 Declaring for purposes of Section 1.150- 2 of the Federal Treasury Regulations, Official Intent to be reimbursed in connection with certain Capital Expenditures; and declaring an emergency G. Resolution No. (R)03-84 Project No. OV 30 03/04 04 Acceptance of bid and award of contract to Southern Arizona Paving& Construction Company in the amount of$54,964.80 for the Moonridge Pavement Rehabilitation and Copper Spring Trail Striping &Median Installation (PULLED FOR DISCUSSION) H. Resolution No. (R)03-85 Authorizing and approving a Contract with Westland Resources, Inc. in the amount of$119,100 for Professional Engineering Design for the South Oracle 16-inch "D"Zone Main I. Resolution No. (R)03-86 Consideration and approval of a Financial Participation Agreement with the Greater Tucson Economic Council J. Resolution No. (R)03-87 Consideration and approval of a Financial Participation Agreement with the Metropolitan Tucson Convention and Visitor's Bureau K. Resolution No. (R)03-88 Consideration and approval of and modification to the Financial Participation Agreement with the Chamber Serving Northern Pima County 10/01/03 Minutes,Town Council Regular Session 3 L. OV12-00-19B Approval of Rancho Vistoso Parcel G re-plat Final Plat for four (4) single family lots located on the west side of Desert Fairways Drive within Rancho Vistoso,Neighborhood 10,Parcel.21922001 G M. OV12-02-21 Extension of the Preliminary Plat for"Aguila at Vistoso" subdivision(Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 5, Parcel N) located on the east side of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard,North of E. Arrowsmith Drive and South of Moore Road,Parcel No. 219-53-004Y G. Resolution No. (R)03-84 Project No. OV 30 03/04 04 Acceptance of bid and award of contract to Southern Arizona Paving & Construction Company in the amount of$54,964.80 for the Moonridge Pavement Rehabilitation and Copper Spring Trail Striping & Median Installation Town Engineer Bill Jansen reviewed the status of the Town's road projects: • La Canada Drive Extension—IGA's with ADOT are completed. Consultant has resumed design work and the design phase is 75% complete. Funding through the PAG process has been secured with an initial proposal for bonding being submitted to the Council for consideration. Construction should begin in March 2004,with completion taking about 10-12 months. • Moore Road Extension—Vistoso Partners will bid out the project in December with completion taking about 6 months. • Copper Spring Trail issues— o Safety issues were forwarded to the Town Engineer and Council by citizens. o Responsibility of Town Engineer-must respond to safety of the public on the Town's roads. o Initial steps—striping of road defines roadway, width of travel lane, shoulder lane, etc. (Colors of striping, signage, etc. are mandated by Manual of Uniform Traffic Devices.) o Considerations can be made regarding reflective verses fluorescent colors. o Staff can meet with neighbors regarding locations of medians/possible addition of one more median. Modifications can be made if there are no impacts on the other 4 medians being installed and no blockage of private driveways. o Chief Sharp has agreed to place traffic trailer along Copper Spring Trail once striping/median installation is completed to monitor traffic speeds. o Medians in conjunction with striping should help restrict speed. o Use factors have not changed with shoulder lane striping, can still park along roadside. Mayor Loomis opened the floor for public comment. Don Bristow, 12190 N. Copper Spring Trail, stated that he feels that the Town created the traffic problems by allowing cut-through construction traffic. He stated that Copper Spring Trail was developed under rural standards and was not designed to be a collector or arterial road. Sharon Brown, 960 W. Silver Spring, reviewed results from a neighborhood survey that was taken. She stated that 73%of the residents voted against center striping, and most favored 10/01/03 Minutes,Town Council Regular Session 4 privatization-of__the_road, with their second choice being center islands. She questioned why • striping had already been done since the contract was being awarded at tonight's meeting. She further stated that the striping has made some residents more comfortable when walking, but people are still driving in the bike lane(shoulder lane) and pedestrians have to get out of the way of the vehicles. Steve Solomon, 919 W. Morning Thunder Court, thanked the Council and staff for taking action on the safety issues along Copper Spring Trail. He stated that he has seen some improvement since the striping was done. He stated that he feels safer when walking in the shoulder lane now whereas before, it was"a free for all." MOTION: Council Member Johnson MOVED to APPROVE Resolution(R)03-84. Council Member Rochman SECONDED the motion. DISCUSSION: In response to questions from Council Member Abbott, Mr. Jansen explained that temporary striping was done until the full contract was awarded. He explained that there were issues within the Moonridge subdivision and they have now been resolved. Therefore, the Town is prepared to move forward with the full project. He explained that the interim striping cost was approximately$2,000 and was done to address the safety issues raised. MOTION CARRIED, 4 - 0. 2. PUBLIC HEARING—CONCERNING THE NOTICE OF INTENT TO INCREASE THE ORO VALLEY TOWN-WIDE ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE FROM $2,008 TO $2,920 Town Engineer Bill Jansen reported that the Council approved Resolution (R)03-62 on July 16, 2003 which established the Notice of Intent to increase the Town's Roadway Development Impact Fee. He explained that the agenda item tonight is for a public hearing only and any action by the Town Council will take place on October 15, 2003. Mr. Jansen then introduced Mr. Curtis Lueck, consultant, on the project. Curtis Lueck, CLA, 5780 W. El Camino del Cerro, reviewed a PowerPoint presentation. Items reviewed were: • Overview of current Ordinance • Ordinance update process o Re-evaluate fee structure o Technical Analysis/Changes since 2000: • Town boundaries expanded to west, south and north. ■ Origins and destinations the same,but more travel now occurs on Town roads. • Added over 8 miles of arterial roads. • "Growing Smarter" legislation was adopted. • Cost of providing roadway capacity has decreased by approximately 2%. o Typical mile of four lane arterial costs $6,195,992. 32,000 daily capacity at 15.7 average Oro Valley arterial vehicle miles traveled per EDU(Equivalent 10/01/03 Minutes,Town Council Regular Session 5 Demand.Unit)per day. Calculation is :$6,195,992/32,000 x 15.7 - $120 (HURF credit)= $2919.91 (rounded to $2,920) • Future Viability of Impact Fees: o Town has annexed to its western and northern limits. o Expansion areas to the south and east are mostly built-out. o Potential for new growth is limited. o Future impact fee revenue potential is limited—Need to consider alternate sources of revenue. RECOMMENDATIONS: • Adopt and implement an increase of a net fee of$2920 per EDU. • Recognize that impact fees will diminish as the Town"grows out. • Continue to consider alternate revenue sources. DISCUSSION: In response to questions from the Council, Mr. Lueck explained that the cost of construction has decreased slightly due to a favorable bidding climate. He also explained that travel through the Town will continue to increase over the years as projects outside the Town's jurisdiction build out. The travel demand will continue to increase on the Town's streets and roads even though the Town's population might level out. He stated that the need for capital projects will not diminish even though the Town stops growing. Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. Steve Solomon, 919 W.Morning Thunder Court, stated that he is a member of Southern Arizona Home Builders Association (SAHBA.) He explained that members of SAHBA have met with Town staff to review calculations on how the figure of$2920 was arrived at. He stated that they were satisfied with the information, computations, etc. that were provided by Town staff and he would recommend to SAHBA that they not oppose the increase in impact fees. Mayor Loomis closed the public hearing. Mayor Loomis recessed the meeting at 8:20. The meeting resumed at 8:32 p.m. 3. PUBLIC HEARING— ORDINANCE NO. (0)03-31 AMENDING THE ORO VALLEY TOWN CODE TO MANDATE THE USE OF RECLAIMED WATER FOR IRRIGATING TWO (2.0) OR MORE ACRES OF TURF,AND ADDING THE AMENDMENTS BY REFERENCE (DECLARED A PUBLIC RECORD BY RESOLUTION NO. (R)03-77) Water Utility Director Alan Forrest reviewed the Council Communication. He explained that as part of the Town's efforts to develop a Reclaimed Water System, several items must be in place prior to issuance of bonds to finance its construction. The first step is to change the Water Code requiring large turf facilities to utilize reclaimed water when it becomes available. He explained that proposed Code amendments mandate that all existing properties inside the Town's water service area that irrigate two (2) acres or more of turf utilize 10/01/03 Minutes,Town Council Regular Session 6 reclaimed water at the time that the Town has Reclaimed Water System within 200 feet of their property. Mr. Forrest stated that new large turf areas would be required to extend the reclaimed water distribution system to their property and use reclaimed water regardless of the distance from the system. He reported that the Water Utility Commission previously recommended approval of the Code changes to the Council. In response to questions from the Council,Mr. Forrest explained that once Phase I and II are completed, the system will cover a large portion of the Town's service area. Once the project is complete, a new facility would be expected to install an extension of the system to their facility(similar to what is required in the potable system.) He also explained that once the new system is tested and ready to go, facilities would have 90 days to connect(with the possibility of a 60 day extension approved administratively if necessary.) If there were extenuating circumstances, the applicant could request more time from the Town Council. Mr. Forrest explained that if the facility did not meet the requirements,their potable service could be discontinued. Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. There being no speakers, the public hearing was closed. MOTION: Council Member Abbott MOVED to ADOPT Ordinance(0)03-31. Council Member Johnson SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 4—0. 4. PUBLIC HEARING— RESOLUTION NO. (R)03-89 TO ESTABLISH A GROUNDWATER PRESERVATION FEE; ESTABLISH A RECLAIMED WATER RATE,AND TO INCREASE EXISTING POTABLE WATER RATES FOR THE ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY Water Utility Administrator Shirley Seng reviewed the Council Communication. She explained that the Resolution approving the Notice of Intention to increase existing potable water rates, establish Groundwater Preservation Fee and establish a Reclaimed Water Rate was approved by the Council on August 20, 2003. She reviewed the public comments that were received and the answers provided to those comments. Ms. Seng then explained that if a Reclaimed System was not constructed, the Water Utility would have to: step up work on bringing CAP to the Town, reapply for an assured water supply designation, revise the Potable Water System Master Plan, increase proposed capital improvements to existing system to address capacity issues, and replace reclaimed water resources. Ms. Seng reported that Potable Water Rates fund the operating and maintenance costs of the potable water system plus capital costs for existing system improvements. The recommended Potable Water Rates for a 5/8 inch by3/4 inch meter would be: • Monthly Base Rate= $12.30 o Tier 1 = $1.92/1000 gals. usage=0— 10,000 gallons o Tier 2 = $2.55/1000 gals usage= 10,001 —25,000 gallons o Tier 3 = $3.25/1000 gals. usage over 25,000 gallons She explained that 90% of the Water Utility customers use the 5/8 inch by 3/4 inch meter with the average usage at 10,000 gallons per month. This would equate to an average monthly increase of 50 cents. 10/01/03 Minutes,Town Council Regular Session 7 Ms. Seng reviewed the Groundwater Preservation Fee proposal. She explained that: • Aquifers are declining at a steady pace. • Groundwater is a finite natural resource. • We have a responsibility to conserve groundwater resources for future generations. • Everyone who consumes groundwater has contributed to the depletion of the aquifer. • Everyone should contribute to the cost to bring renewable water to the Town in an effort to preserve groundwater. • Preservation Fee will finance delivery systems that will provide renewable water supplies. • Recommended Rate: All customers (potable and reclaimed)will be assessed the fee of 21 cents per 1,000 gallons of water used. Cost for average resident=$2.10 per month. Ms. Seng also reviewed the Reclaimed Water Rate proposal explaining that: • This will fund the operating and maintenance expenses of the reclaimed system plus a portion of reclaimed capital costs. • Recommended Rate: Equal to Tier 1 of potable water rate. • Only reclaimed water customers pay. • After all existing golf courses are on the system, it is recommended that a 10% discount be applied. Ms. Seng explained that all fees will be reviewed on an annual basis. She also reviewed charts depicting"Impacts to Customers", "Rate Comparisons with Other Cities and Towns" and "Who is Paying for the Reclaimed System." She then explained that any rates adopted by the Council would become effective on November 1st Dr. Leo Leonhart, 11435 N. Flying Bird Drive, Vice Chair of the Water Utility Commission and Chairman of Renewable Water Resources Subcommittee, stated that the proposed action would enable the Water Utility to offset a significant percentage of the Town's demand for high quality,potable water that is now being pumped for the aquifer. He stated that the Water Utility and the Commission have carefully debated the fairness and relevance of alternative financing schemes for the project and that the proposal represents their best efforts to provide a"fair and balanced approach." He stated that the consideration should be for who benefits and not necessarily who pays. Dr. Leonhart urged the Council to adopt the reclaimed water proposal stating that it was a positive measure. In response to questions from the Council, Mr. Forrest and/or Ms. Seng explained: • Assured water supply is typically renewed every ten years, unless other factors(i.e. growth greater than projections) come into place. • Golf courses will typically use more water when on the reclaimed water system in order to leach additional salts out that are present in the reclaimed water. One local golf course has stated that they use about 15%more water now that they are using reclaimed water. • Must have reclaimed water rates in place in order for bonding to move forward. Customers will not be paying the rates for at least two years, so there is time to research numbers to see if any adjustments need to be made. 10/01/03 Minutes,Town Council Regular Session 8 • Reclaimed Water is not typically set up with tiered rates. This acts as an incentive to people who are not required to use reclaimed water to go ahead and access the system. • If the property owner requested water service from the Town, and they have an existing well on their property,they would be asked to abandon the well per State law and Arizona Department of Environmental Quality requirements as they do not allow interconnection of different systems. • Extra monies from the Groundwater Preservation Fee could be used to purchase CAP water, to build dams in the CDO wash to collect water to recharge the aquifer,etc. • No credits or compensation were given to golf courses in lieu of paying for potable water infrastructure. Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. Bill Adler, 10720 N. Eagle Eye Place, disagreed with Dr. Leonhart's comment regarding the fact that it was unimportant who pays. He stated that commercial users can pass the increase onto their customers,but the homeowner can not absorb those costs in the same way. He stated that it was a disproportionate rate to the homeowners to charge them 40 percent,when it should be no more than 10— 15 percent. He stated that he felt that commercial developments did not pay for themselves and that impact fees have always been calculated at an artificially low level. Gordon Byrnes,member of the Water Utility Commission and Golf Course Superintendent for the El Conquistador Country Club, stated that the Country Club is currently paying$1.92 per 1,000 gallons of water used. He stated that the Groundwater Preservation Fee would add 21 cents to that and the Reclaimed Water Rate would increase their cost another 46 cents per 1,000 gallons. Then there would be additional costs incurred to treat algae in ponds,higher PH in reclaimed water, etc. He stated that when all is considered,they are looking at an approximate increase of 50%. He asked that the scenarios be revisited. Doug McKee, 11836 Cassiopeia, thanked the Town staff for their help in understanding the economics and factors involved in the proposals. He stated that the incentive for investing in the Reclaimed Water System is primarily to meet the State's requirements. He stated that one of those requirements is for new development to show that they are mostly using renewable water resources. He also stated that everyone has to stabilize the groundwater levels and there is the potential to pay huge fines if these requirements are not met. He also stated that new development would come to a halt if reclaimed water or CAP was not put into place. Mr. McKee asked that more equitable shares be assigned to future developers as new development should pay for a greater portion of the costs rather than the existing customers. Mayor Loomis closed the public hearing. MOTION: Council Member Johnson MOVED to APPROVE Resolution (R)03-89 establishing a Groundwater Preservation Fee, establishing a Reclaimed Water Rate and increasing existing Potable Water Rates for the Oro Valley Water Utility as identified in Exhibit "A"of said Resolution. Council Member Rochman SECONDED the motion. 10/01/03 Minutes,Town Council Regular Session 9 DISCUSSION: Council Member Abbott commented that everyone wants to see the golf courses off of groundwater, but she was troubled with the rate structure. She stated that residents would not really be able to connect to the reclaimed water system and since they are paying for the system, don't they have a right to be connected to it? She also stated that she did not agree with the Tier system as it seemed to be punitive to residents and generous to commercial users since commercial users can pass fees on to their customers and residents can not. She also questioned why the Town couldn't just ban use of the groundwater on golf courses. In response to a question from Mayor Loomis regarding connection to the reclaimed water system, Mr. Forrest explained that there was nothing that would restrict anyone from connecting to the system. He stated that as long as one met the State's standards for using it and applying it, then there would be no reason why anyone could not utilize the reclaimed water if they chose to. Council Member Johnson stated that the reclaimed water rates apply to all large turf areas(2 acres and above)which would include Town parks, school playgrounds, etc. He stated that the Town and the school could only pass this on by assessing taxes etc. He said that golf courses were easy targets;however,the golf courses provide a lot of sales tax revenue and a quality of life for the Town's residents. He also noted that we do live in the desert and water is relatively cheap compared to other areas of the country. He stated that the proposals have been studied extensively by the Water Utility Commission and the proposal represents a balance. He stated that the Town will continue to evaluate the water rates. Council Member Rochman stated it is certain that we must bring in additional water into the Town. He also stated that there are many benefits to the Town brought about from those people that utilize the golf courses, etc. Mayor Loomis thanked the Water Utility Commission, staff and the consultant for their efforts on the project. He stated that the Council identified working towards a Reclaimed Water System as a top priority. He stated that the Commission, staff and consultant have worked hard to find a good cost for the system, a good cost to operate the system,how to adjust those costs to the public and the users and how it will be paid for. MOTION CARRIED, 3 — 1 with Council Member Abbott opposed. Mayor Loomis recessed the meeting at 9:40 p.m. The meeting resumed at 9:50 p.m. 5. PUBLIC HEARING—ORDINANCE NO. (0)03-32 AN ORDINANCE TRANSLATING THE ZONING FOR THE NEWLY ANNEXED AREA COMMONLY KNOWN AS AREA "B" FROM PIMA COUNTY ZONING DESIGNATIONS TO TOWN OF ORO VALLEY DESIGNATIONS AND AMENDING THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY ZONING MAP: AND REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH Community Development Director Brent Sinclair reported that on April 7, 2003 the Town annexed 654.7 acres commonly known as "Area B". He explained that in accordance with State Statutes, the Town is now required to translate the zoning on the annexed properties 10/01/03 Minutes,Town Council Regular Session 10 from its original zoning designation to the closest comparable Oro Valley zoning designation. He explained that approval of Ordinance(0)03-32 would translate the zoning of seventeen (17) areas and the inclusion of specific conditions would insure that specific rights are maintained on particular properties. Mr. Sinclair also explained that the previous adoption of Resolution (R)03-68 by the Town Council in August, 2002 would ensure that livestock rights would be maintained on properties in the newly annexed area. In response to a question from Council Member Abbott,Mr. Sinclair explained that the property owners that were directly affected were notified of the translational zoning as required by State law. Property owners outside the area were not notified; however, if it were a rezoning issue, then all property owners within 600 feet would have been notified. Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. Don Laidlaw, Laidlaw Consultants, 2841 E 3rd, stated that there was a technicality involving a • property south of the rear service area of the shopping center located on the southeast corner of Magee. He explained that two properties are separated by a 20-foot County alley right-of- way. He stated that the RS zoning contains a provision that requires a 20-foot setback from an alley, along the side yard. He explained that the subject property contains some areas of floodplain, some areas of vegetation, and the developable area of the property is very narrow. Mr. Laidlaw explained that a 20-foot setback would reduce the developable area for a building down to a depth of 20-25 foot maximum. He stated that the County TR zoning only required a 7-foot side yard setback and also allowed the Administrator to reduce that down to zero. Mr. Laidlaw stated that he just wanted to make it a matter of record, and the remedy for the property would be either to seek a variance from the Board of Adjustment or to apply for a rezoning for the property sometime in the future. He then commended the staff for all that they did to carry out the annexation process. Mayor Loomis closed the public hearing. MOTION: Council Member Rochman MOVED to ADOPT Ordinance (0)03-32,translating the zoning from Pima County to the Town of Oro Valley zoning districts for"Area B" as annexed by Ordinance (0)03-09 adopted April 7, 2003. Council Member Johnson SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 4— 0. COUNCIL REPORTS—No reports. TOWN MANAGER'S REPORT—No report. DEPARTMENT HEAD REPORTS —No reports. CALL TO AUDIENCE—No speakers. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Council Member Johnson MOVED to ADJOURN AT 10:05 p.m. Council Member Abbott SECONDED the motion. Motion carried 4—0. 10/01/03 Minutes,Town Council Regular Session 11 Respectfully submitted, Roxana Garrity, CMC Deputy Town Clerk I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the regular session of the Town of Oro Valley Council of Oro Valley, Arizona held on the 1st day of October 2003. I further certify that the meeting was duly called and held and that a quorum was present. Dated this / day of 06 iv be/ ,2003. Ce. 0-4,“4_,Le-,,,L- Kath E. Cuvelier, CMC Town Clerk