HomeMy WebLinkAboutOV90321 r •
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
STAFF REPORT TO TOWN COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 1, 2003
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL
FROM: David Ronquillo, Planner I
SUBJECT: ORDINANCE 0(03)-32 (EXHIBIT A-1 AND A-2), OV9-03-21, TRANSLATIONAL
ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY EQUIVALENT
FOR THE ANNEXED AREA LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF
NORTHERN AVENUE AND CAMINO CORTARO FROM PIMA COUNTY CR-4
(MIXED DWELLING TYPE ZONE) TO THE TOWN'S R-4 (TOWNHOUSE
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT) DESIGNATION FOR PARCEL NUMBERS; 225-142-770,
225-142-780, 225-142-790, 225-142-800, 225-143-440, 225-143-420, 225-143-310, 225-143-
320, 225-143-330, 225-143-300, 225-143-290 225-143-280, 225-143-270, 225-143-260, 225-
143-250, 225-143-240, 225-143-410, 225-143-400, 225-143-340, 225-143-390, 225-143-380,
225-143-370, 225-143-360, 225-143-350, 225-143-430, 225-142-810, 225-142-820, 225-142-
830, 225-142-840, 225-142-850, 225-142-860, 225-142-870, 225-142-880, 225-142-890, 225-
142-900, 225-142-910, 225-142-920, 225-142-930, 225-142-940, 225-142-950, 225-142-960,
225-142-970, 225-142-980, 225-142-990, 225-143-000, 225-143-010, 225-143-020, 225-143-
030, 225-143-040, 225-143-050, 225-43-060, 225-143-070, 225-143-080, 225-143-090, 225-
143-100, 225-143-110, 225-143-120, 225-143-130, 225-143-140, 225-143-150, 225-143-160,
225-143-170, 225-143-180, 225-143-190, 225-143-200, 25-143-210, 225-143-220, 225-143-230
BACKGROUND:
On May 7, 2003, the Town of Oro Valley annexed the above referenced area as part of a larger annexation of
land called "Area B" (Ordinance No. (0) 03-09). The attached map identifies the location of the area and the
current and proposed zoning designations.
In accordance with State Statutes, the Town is required to change or "translate" the zoning on the annexed
properties from its original zoning designation to the closest comparable Oro Valley zoning designation.
Section 9-471(L) of the Arizona Revised Statutes (ARS) states:
"A city or town annexing an area shall adopt zoning classifications which permit densities and uses no
greater than those permitted by the county immediately before annexation. Subsequent changes in
zoning of the annexed territory shall be made according to existing procedures established by the city or
town for the rezoning of land."
SUMMARY:
The Pima County zoning designation for this area is Multiple Dwelling Type Zone (CR-4) and the most similar
Oro Valley zoning district is R-4 (Town House Residential). The existing use is single family residential.
F:\OV\OV9\2003\9-03-21\TCRPT.10-01-03.doc
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
TOWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Page 2
OVERVIEW OF THE PROPOSED TRANSLATIONAL ZONES:
Pima County CR-4
The Pima County CR-4 zone allows for general residential providing for single detached dwellings, duplex and
multiple dwellings units. The minimum lot area in this district is 7,000 square feet for single family dwellings
and 3,000 to 5,000 square feet for multiple dwellings. The lots in this subdivision range in size from 4,700
square feet to 5,500 square feet.
Pima County Rezoning
In 1995, this area was subject to a rezoning, Pima County Case #C09-95-43. It was conditionally rezoned to
CR-4. All conditions and requirements of the rezoning will remain in effect with the approval of the
translational zoning.
Town of Oro Valley R-4
The Town's R-4 district allows for single family dwellings attached or detached with a minimum lots area of
5,450 square feet.
GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE:
The Town's current 1996 TOV General Plan designation in this area ranges from Low Density Residential (.4-.5
DU/ac) to Medium High Density Residential (5.0-10.1 DU/ac). The uses in these categories are primarily for
residential purposes from single family dwellings to multiple family attached dwellings. The existing
residential use conforms with the General Plan.
The Town's proposed 2020 General Plan (adopted by Town Council but not yet ratified by the voters)
designates this area as High Density Residential (5+DU/ac). The existing use conforms to the General Plan.
NOTIFICATION:
All property owners within the annexed area have been notified of this proposed translational zoning and the
area was posted in accordance with Town and State statutes. To date, no comments have been received.
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION ACTION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission on September 2, 2003 voted 5-0 to recommend conditional approval of
the translational zoning, specifying that"the County CR-4 building height be maintained by the Town".
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Town Council approve the translational zoning from Pima County CR-4 (Multiple
Dwelling Type Zone) to the Oro Valley R-4 (Townhouse Residential District) with the conditions in Exhibit A-
2.
F:\OV\OV9\2003\9-03-21\TCRPT.10-01-03.doc
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
TOWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Page 3
SUGGESTED MOTION:
The Town Council may wish to consider the following suggested motion:
I move to adopt Ordinance (0) 03-32, translating the zoning from Pima County to the Town Oro Valley zoning
districts for Area"B"as annexed by Ordinance(0) 03-09 adopted April 7, 2003.
Attachment:
1. Property location
2. Zoning Map
F:\OV\OV9\2003\9-03-21\TCRPT.10-01-03.doc
EXHIBIT A-2 TO ORDINANCE NO. (0) 03-32
OV9-03-21
1. The subject parcels will be subject to Section 18.27.030 of the October 2002 Pima
County Code regarding building heights,which is a maximum of 34'.
2. All prior rezoning conditions and requirements, included in the Pima County
ordinance as part of case#C09-95-43,remain in effect.
1
•
k)
r x k yy /may
C
EXHIBIT A-1 TO ORDINANCE NO. (0) 03-32
OV9-03-21
TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY CR-4 (MIXED
DWELLING TYPE ZONE) TO THE TOWN'S R-4 (TOWNHOUSE
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT) DESIGNATION FOR PARCEL NUMBERS; 225-142-
770, 225-142-780, 225-142-790, 225-142-800, 225-143-440, 225-143-420, 225-143-3101
225-143-320, 225-143-330, 225-143-300, 225-143-290 225-143-280, 225-143-270, 225-
143-260, 225-143-250, 225-143-240, 225-143-410, 225-143-400, 225-143-340, 225-143-
390, 225-143-380, 225-143-370, 225-143-360, 225-143-350, 225-143-430, 225-142-8101
225-142-820, 225-142-830, 225-142-840, 225-142-850, 225-142-860, 225-142-870, 225-
142-880, 225-142-890, 225-142-900, 225-142-910, 225-142-920, 225-142-930, 225-142-
940, 225-142-950, 225-142-960, 225-142-970, 225-142-980, 225-142-990, 225-143-000,
225-143-010, 225-143-020, 225-143-030, 225-143-040, 225-143-050, 225-43-060, 225-
143-070, 225-143-080, 225-143-090, 225-143-100, 225-143-110, 225-143-120, 225-143-
130, 225-143-140, 225-143-150, 225-143-160, 225-143-170, 225-143-180, 225-143-1901
225-143-200, 25-143-210, 225-143-220, 225-143-230
AFFIDAVIT "r PUBLICATION
STATE OF ARIZONA)
COUNTY OF PIMA )
KAREN BRIGHAM being first
duly sworn, deposes and says that (he) (she) is the Legal Advertising Manager
of THE DAILY TERRITORIAL, a daily newspaper printed and published in the
County of Pima, State of Arizona, and of general circulation in the City of Tuc-
son,
County of Pima, State of Arizona and elsewhere, and the hereto attached
0V;'---03•--. :I
PUBLIC NOTICE
was printed and published correctly in the regular and entire issue of said THE
1
DAILY TERRITORIAL for issues; that was first made
10th SEPTEMBER 03
on the day of 10th 20
and the last.publication thereof was made on the day of
SEPTEMBER 03
20 ; that said publication
cp,,inefiRy. each of the following dates, to-wit:
Request of
TOWN OF QR0 VALLEY
Daily Territorial
' r
r �, '.�l[3 y 1 �,,
Subscribed ar be rem C1' Y
da of
10t�i SEPTEMBER
20
/// 1
--� Notr,,z:I.;otio State Of A ,��
of P kxrdifigyCouolity o 'im,, S tire', Arizore
Robyn Dailey McSarabs
MyCommission Ex it
p P�� s Juone 15,2007
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFOF
ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL
In accordance with ARS 9-462 and Section 3-111 of the Or !Zoning Code Re-
vised, NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FOR RE-
CENTLY ANNEXED PROPERTY BEFORE THE ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL IS
HEREBY GIVEN:
TIME:at or after 7:00 p.m.October 1,2003
PLACE:Oro Valley Town Hall,11,000 N.La Canada Drive,Oro Valley,Arizona
SUBJECT:PUBLIC HEARING:OV9-03-21,TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA
COUNTY TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY EQUIVALENT FOR THE ANNEXED
AREA LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF NORTHERN AVENUE AND
CAMINO CORTARO FROM PIMA COUNTY CR-4(MIXED DWELLING TYPE ZONE)
TO THE TOWN'S R-4(TOWNHOUSE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT)DESIGNATION
FOR PARCEL NUMBERS;225-142-770,225-142-780,225-142-790,225-142-800,
225-143-440,225-143-420,225-143-310,225-143-320,225-143-330,225-143-300,
225-143-290 225-143-280,225-143-270,225-143-260,225-143-250,225-143-240,
225-143-410,225-143-400,225-143-340,225-143-390,225-143-380,225-143-370,
225-143-360,225-143-350,225-143-430,225-142-810,225-142-820,225-142-830,
225-142-840,225-142-850,225-142-860,225-142-870,225-142-880,225-142-890,
225-142-900,225-142-910,225-142-920,225-142-930,225-142-940,225-142-950,
225-142-960,225-142-970,225-142-980,225-142-990,225-143-000,225-143-010,
225-143-020,225-143-030,225-143-040,225-143-050,225-43-060,225-143-070,
225-143-080,225-143-090,225-143-100,225-143-110,225-143-120,225-143-130,
225-143-140,225-143-150,225-143-160,225-143-170,225-143-180,225-143-190,
225-143-200,25-143-210,225-143-220,225-143-230
This property was annexed to the Town on May 7,2003 and,in accordance with
State Statutes,the Town is required to change,or"translate",the zoning on annexed
properties to the closest comparable zoning district within the new jurisdiction.
Members of the public are invited to attend this meeting and will be given an opportu-
nity to speak. For additional information,please contact David Ronquillo,Planner I,
or at dronquillo@orovalley.net./s/Bayer Vella,AICP Senior Planner
Pub:The Daily Territorial
September 10,2003
Req:Town of Oro Valley
pnov9-03-21 kb
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
BEFORE THE
ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL
In accordance with ARS 9-462 and Section 3-111 of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised, NOTICE OF
PUBLIC HEARING FOR TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FOR RECENTLY ANNEXED PROPERTY
BEFORE THE ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL IS HEREBY GIVEN:
TIME: at or after 7:00 p.m. October 1,2003
PLACE: Oro Valley Town Hall, 11,000 N. La Canada Drive, Oro Valley,Arizona
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: OV9-03-21, TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM
PIMA COUNTY TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY EQUIVALENT FOR
THE ANNEXED AREA LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF
NORTHERN AVENUE AND CAMINO CORTARO FROM PIMA COUNTY
CR-4 (MIXED DWELLING TYPE ZONE) TO THE TOWN'S R-4
(TOWNHOUSE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT) DESIGNATION FOR
PARCEL NUMBERS; 225-142-770, 225-142-780, 225-142-790, 225-142-800,
225-143-440, 225-143-420, 225-143-310, 225-143-320, 225-143-330, 225-143-
300, 225-143-290 225-143-280, 225-143-270, 225-143-260, 225-143-250, 225-
143-240, 225-143-410, 225-143-400, 225-143-340, 225-143-390, 225-143-380,
225-143-370, 225-143-360, 225-143-350, 225-143-430, 225-142-810, 225-142-
820, 225-142-830, 225-142-840, 225-142-850, 225-142-860, 225-142-870, 225-
142-880, 225-142-890, 225-142-900, 225-142-910, 225-142-920, 225-142-930,
225-142-940, 225-142-950, 225-142-960, 225-142-970, 225-142-980, 225-142-
990, 225-143-000, 225-143-010, 225-143-020, 225-143-030, 225-143-040, 225-
143-050, 225-43-060, 225-143-070, 225-143-080, 225-143-090, 225-143-100, 225-
143-110, 225-143-120, 225-143-130, 225-143-140, 225-143-150, 225-143-160,
225-143-170, 225-143-180, 225-143-190, 225-143-200, 25-143-210, 225-143-220,
225-143-230
This property was annexed to the Town on May 7, 2003 and, in accordance with
State Statutes, the Town is required to change, or "translate", the zoning on
annexed properties to the closest comparable zoning district within the new
jurisdiction.
Members of the public are invited to attend this meeting and will be given an opportunity to speak. For
additional information,please contact David Ronquillo, Planner I, or at dronquilIorri orov alle;-.net.
vii/A.
POSTED: 9-11-03
Bayer Vella,7AICP time: 10 : 3 0 a.m.
Senior Planner by: drm
F:\OV\OV9\2003\9-03-21\Town Council Notice.doc
_ --iv- 1,, —....21111111MMINMEMCEMMERA
IIIIIIsicjotlTOWN OF ORO VALLEY ,.., e
11000 N. LA CANADA DR. . ..
, .-- ,A
__i P M _ ...........4, ...#,----r-,i---;4,4-------
---"`"t I:
i H- -8 ,I . ' -V4
ORO VALLEY,ARIZONA 85737
i ' „...--r•P,r
ct -,,,,,,,,,0 )
Vi•'', Ai!-.,
,
kien-,pied , ."--"'"••• --..A.: ‘',,,,..._ 0,Or...,"
igalb, -.....--
/np.., - . •Mt fritv,
41drer,,l'•-, ::t;ci, ---
' '1,e0 in LuCt)f‘itifitE7r----s
225143350
SCHMITZ TRACI S
399 W TARA DANETTE DR 41/0
TUCSON AZ 202 n
85704-0000 403
SCHM944 8S/01.40 / IN ii 08/16/03
RETURN TO SENDER
NO FORWARD ORDER ON FILE
UNABLE TO FORWARD
RETURN TO SENDER
7 r:
:...:...• . .---..... : :-...-:...:--:
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY r\
11000 N. LA CANADA DR. Pt't
ORO VALLEY,ARIZONA 8571i
.1 a TURN TO SENDER NOT DEL I VERABLE AS ADDRESSED 4 s
n stv, .
2003
nicsOti AZ 0918
225143350
SCHMITZ TRACI S
399 W TARA DANETTE DR
TUCSON AZ
85704-0000
857042010 1N 09/15/03
*A****************
* ZONE SEPARATOR *
******************
gerE-PSIV• --Yr% 11111/1111;1111111111111111;;;IihtimillillinliAlitiaid
5o N q 2
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY v 6 „ ...--- -
11000 N. LA CANADA DR. ? FM + _....,..'"""'~_______--...."
ORO VALLEY,ARIZONA 8547Tijm i0 sEnlia MT reivEyi4.11LE ES rtSSFI 4 I F P �; ,r.,,,.----r.
:«1.r.z Mom,.. ., _ _ a
J J►CS&, AZ 0917 -.. "
225143250
RHOADS JONATHAN ELLIS &ERIN MICHELLE Sri) j
NIKOLAS CT CP/RS 8 2003
8360
8360 S AUSTIN
TUCSON AZ
85706-0000
c ;41 — f ' 7 7 11111ii1}il1ltilil11f1litiliilillitii3iiii1,1.1.1lt1l1lfI11111
MINUTES
ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL
REGULAR SESSION
OCTOBER 01,2003
ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
11,000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE
REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 7:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER 7:02 p.m.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Paul Loomis,Mayor
Paula Abbott, Council Member
Dick Johnson, Council Member
Bart Rochman, Council Member
EXCUSED: Werner Wolff, Vice Mayor
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Loomis led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance.
UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS
Police Chief Danny Sharp reviewed the upcoming meetings and events.
CALL TO AUDIENCE
Helen Dankwerth, 11515 N. Flying Bird Drive, expressed concerns that references to Mixed
Use Neighborhood(MUN)designations may still remain in the General Plan update.
Bill Adler, 10720 N. Eagle Eye Place, expressed concerns regarding temporary signs that are
placed in the public right of way.
Richard Anemone, 13987 N. Honey Tree Place, questioned why the Oro Valley Police
Officers Association was denied the right to circulate petitions in order to place an initiative
on the ballot regarding a"Meet and Confer"measure. He asked that they be allowed to
gather petitions, forward the matter to the voters, and then if the voters approve the initiative,
the legalities can be addressed.
Sharon Brown, 960 W. Silver Spring Place, asked for clarification on the completion of the
Town's road projects. She also presented the Council with pictures depicting the status of
Moore Road at Copper Spring Trail and illegal construction traffic along Copper Spring Trail.
Dan Krueger, 11,000 N. La Canada Drive, President of the Oro Valley Police Officers
Association,thanked those Council members who agreed to meet with the Association to
discuss the "Meet and Confer"issue. He asked that the Council place the item on a future
10/01/03 Minutes,Town Council Regular Session 2
Agenda for consideration or that the Town Attorney"step out of the way" and let the voters
decide. He also asked that the Mayor agree to meet with the officers to discuss the issue.
Carmen Trevizo, 11,000 N. La Canada Drive,Treasurer of the Oro Valley Police Officers
Association, stated that their goal is to get a long term contract set up with the Association
and the Town. She explained that there are morale problems within the Police Department
due to the perception that all officers are not being treated equally and issues seem to be
treated at random or arbitrarily. She asked that the Council revisit the"Meet and Confer"
issue.
Council Member Johnson directed staff to look into the comments received by Ms.
Dankwerth regarding MUNs and by Mr. Adler regarding temporary signage.
Council Member Abbott directed staff to look into case law supporting the decision to not
allow the "Meet and Confer"issue to be placed on the ballot.
1. CONSENT AGENDA
MOTION: Council Member Johnson MOVED to APPROVE the Consent Agenda with
the exception of Item G. Council Member Rochman SECONDED the motion. Motion
carried,4—0.
A. Minutes—9/8/03; 9/15/03; 9/17/03
B. Library Monthly Activity Report—August 2003
kir)
C. Reappointment of Bob Horn to the Municipal Property Board of
Directors with term set to expire September 30, 2006
D. Appointment of Richard Tracy to the Public Safety Public Retirement System
Local Board
E. Report on emergency repairs to water Well F-1
F. Resolution No.(R)03-83 Declaring for purposes of Section 1.150-
2 of the Federal Treasury Regulations, Official Intent to be
reimbursed in connection with certain Capital Expenditures; and
declaring an emergency
G. Resolution No. (R)03-84 Project No. OV 30 03/04 04 Acceptance of bid and
award of contract to Southern Arizona Paving& Construction Company in the
amount of$54,964.80 for the Moonridge Pavement Rehabilitation and Copper
Spring Trail Striping &Median Installation (PULLED FOR DISCUSSION)
H. Resolution No. (R)03-85 Authorizing and approving a Contract with
Westland Resources, Inc. in the amount of$119,100 for Professional
Engineering Design for the South Oracle 16-inch"D"Zone Main
I. Resolution No. (R)03-86 Consideration and approval of a Financial
Participation Agreement with the Greater Tucson Economic Council
J. Resolution No. (R)03-87 Consideration and approval of a Financial
Participation Agreement with the Metropolitan Tucson Convention and
Visitor's Bureau
Li) K. Resolution No. (R)03-88 Consideration and approval of and modification to
the Financial Participation Agreement with the Chamber Serving Northern
Pima County
10/01/03 Minutes,Town Council Regular Session 3
L. OV12-00-19B Approval of Rancho Vistoso Parcel G re-plat Final Plat for four
(4) single family lots located on the west side of Desert Fairways Drive within
1401 Rancho Vistoso,Neighborhood 10,Parcel 21922001 G
M. OV12-02-21 Extension of the Preliminary Plat for"Aguila at Vistoso"
subdivision(Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 5,Parcel N)located on the east
side of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard,North of E. Arrowsmith Drive and South of
Moore Road,Parcel No. 219-53-004Y
G. Resolution No. (R)03-84 Project No. OV 30 03/04 04 Acceptance of bid and
award of contract to.Southern Arizona Paving & Construction Company in the amount
of$54,964.80 for the Moonridge Pavement Rehabilitation and Copper.Spring Trail
Striping& Median Installation
Town Engineer Bill Jansen reviewed the status of the Town's road projects:
• La Canada Drive Extension—IGA's with ADOT are completed. Consultant has
resumed design work and the design phase is 75% complete. Funding through the
PAG process has been secured with an initial proposal for bonding being submitted to
the Council for consideration. Construction should begin in March 2004,with
completion taking about 10-12 months.
• Moore Road Extension-Vistoso Partners will bid out the project in December with
completion taking about 6 months.
• Copper Spring Trail issues
o Safety issues were forwarded to the Town Engineer and Council by citizens.
o Responsibility of Town Engineer-must respond to safety of the public on the
‘111100 Town's roads.
o Initial steps—striping of road defines roadway, width of travel lane, shoulder
lane, etc. (Colors of striping, signage,etc. are mandated by Manual of
Uniform Traffic Devices.)
o Considerations can be made regarding reflective verses fluorescent colors.
o Staff can meet with neighbors regarding locations of medians/possible addition
of one more median. Modifications can be made if there are no impacts on the
other 4 medians being installed and no blockage of private driveways.
o Chief Sharp has agreed to place traffic trailer along Copper Spring Trail once
striping/median installation is completed to monitor traffic speeds.
o Medians in conjunction with striping should help restrict speed.
o Use factors have not changed with shoulder lane striping, can still park along
roadside.
Mayor Loomis opened the floor for public comment.
Don Bristow, 12190 N. Copper Spring Trail, stated that he feels that the Town created the
traffic problems by allowing cut-through construction traffic. He stated that Copper Spring
Trail was developed under rural standards and was not designed to be a collector or arterial
road.
Sharon Brown, 960 W..Silver Spring, reviewed results from a neighborhood survey that was
taken. She stated that 73%of the residents voted against center striping, and most favored
10/01/03 Minutes,Town Council Regular Session 4
privatization-o-f-the_road,with their second choice being center islands. She questioned why
0;i) striping had already been done since the contract was being awarded at tonight's meeting.
She further stated that the'striping has made some residents more comfortable when walking,
but people are still driving in the bike lane(shoulder lane) and pedestrians have to get out of
the way of the vehicles.
Steve Solomon, 919 W. Morning Thunder Court, thanked the Council and staff for taking
action on the safety issues along Copper Spring Trail. He stated that he has seen some
improvement since the striping was done. He stated that he feels safer when walking in the
shoulder lane now whereas before,it was"a free for all."
MOTION: Council Member Johnson MOVED to APPROVE Resolution(R)03-84. Council
Member Rochman SECONDED the motion.
DISCUSSION: In response to questions from Council Member Abbott, Mr. Jansen explained
that temporary striping was done until the full contract was awarded. He explained that there
were issues within the Moonridge subdivision and they have now been resolved. Therefore,
the Town is prepared to move forward with the full project. He explained that the interim
striping cost was approximately$2,000 and was done to address the safety issues raised.
MOTION CARRIED, 4 - 0.
2. PUBLIC HEARING—CONCERNING THE NOTICE OF INTENT TO
INCREASE THE ORO VALLEY TOWN-WIDE ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT
tifif IMPACT FEE FROM $2,008 TO $2,920
Town Engineer Bill Jansen reported that the Council approved Resolution (R)03-62 on July
16,2003 which established the Notice of Intent to increase the Town's Roadway
Development Impact Fee. He explained that the agenda item tonight is for a public hearing
only and any action by the Town Council will take place on October 15, 2003. Mr.Jansen
then introduced Mr. Curtis Lueck,consultant,on the project.
Curtis Lueck, CLA, 5780 W. El Camino del Cerro,reviewed a PowerPoint presentation.
Items reviewed were:
• Overview of current Ordinance
• Ordinance update process
o Re-evaluate fee structure
o Technical Analysis/Changes since 2000:
• Town boundaries expanded to west, south and north.
• Origins and destinations the same,but more travel now occurs on Town
roads.
• Added over 8 miles of arterial roads.
• "Growing Smarter"legislation was adopted.
• Cost of providing roadway capacity has decreased by approximately 2%.
o Typical mile of four lane arterial costs $6,195,992. 32,000 daily capacity at
15.7 average Oro Valley arterial vehicle miles traveled per EDU(Equivalent
10/01/03 Minutes,Town Council Regular Session 5
Demand.Unit),per day. Calculation is :$6,195,992/32,000 x 15.7 -$120
(HURF credit)=$2919.91 (rounded to $2,920)
hilad • Future Viability of Impact Fees:
P
o Town has annexed to its western and northern limits.
o Expansion areas to the south and east are mostly built-out.
o Potential for new growth is limited.
o Future impact fee revenue potential is limited:Need to consider alternate
sources of revenue.
RECOMMENDATIONS
• Adopt and implement an increase of a net fee of$2920 per EDU.
• Recognize that impact fees will diminish as the Town"grows out."
• Continue to consider alternate revenue sources.
DISCUSSION:
In response to questions from the Council,Mr. Lueck explained that the cost of construction
has decreased slightly due to a favorable bidding climate. He also explained that travel
through the Town will continue to increase over the years as projects outside the Town's
jurisdiction build out. The travel demand will continue to increase on the Town's streets and
roads even though the Town's population might level out. He stated that the need for capital
projects will not diminish even though the Town stops growing.
Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing.
LI') Steve Solomon, 919 W.Morning Thunder Court, stated that he is a member of Southern
Arizona Home Builders Association(SAHBA.) He explained that members of SAHBA have
met with Town staff to review calculations on how the figure of$2920 was arrived at. He
stated that they were satisfied with the information, computations,etc. that were provided by
Town staff and he would recommend to SAHBA that they not oppose the increase in impact
fees.
Mayor Loomis closed the public hearing.
Mayor Loomis recessed the meeting at 8:20. The meeting resumed at 8:32 p.m.
3. PUBLIC HEARING—ORDINANCE NO. (0)03-31 AMENDING THE ORO
VALLEY TOWN CODE TO MANDATE THE USE OF RECLAIMED WATER FOR
IRRIGATING TWO (2.0) OR MORE ACRES OF TURF,AND ADDING THE
AMENDMENTS BY REFERENCE (DECLARED A PUBLIC RECORD BY
RESOLUTION NO. (R)03-77)
Water Utility Director Alan Forrest reviewed the Council Communication. He explained that
as part of the Town's efforts to develop a Reclaimed Water System, several items must be in
place prior to issuance of bonds to finance its construction. The first step is to change the
Water Code requiring large turf facilities to utilize reclaimed water when it becomes
C.; available. He explained that proposed Code amendments mandate that all existing properties
inside the Town's water service area that irrigate two (2) acres or more of turf utilize
10/01/03 Minutes,Town Council Regular Session ' 6
reclaimed water at the time that the Town has Reclaimed Water System within 200 feet of
their property.Mr. Forrest stated that new large turf areas would be required to extend the
reclaimed water distribution system to their property and use reclaimed water regardless of
the distance from the system. He reported that the Water Utility Commission previously
recommended approval of the Code changes to the Council.
In response to questions from the Council,Mr. Forrest explained that once Phase I and II are
completed,the system will cover a large portion of the Town's service area. Once the project
is complete, a new facility would be expected to install an extension of the system to their
facility(similar to what is required in the potable system.) He also explained that once the
new system is tested and ready to go, facilities would have 90 days to connect(with the
possibility of a 60 day extension approved administratively if necessary.) If there were
extenuating circumstances, the applicant could request more time from the Town Council.
Mr. Forrest explained that if the facility did not meet the requirements,their potable service
could be discontinued.
Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. There being no speakers,the public hearing was
closed.
MOTION: Council Member Abbott MOVED to ADOPT Ordinance(0)03-31. Council
Member Johnson SECONDED the motion. Motion carried,4-0.
4. PUBLIC HEARING—RESOLUTION NO. (R)03-89 TO ESTABLISH A
GROUNDWATER PRESERVATION FEE; ESTABLISH A RECLAIMED WATER
NS RATE,AND TO INCREASE EXISTING POTABLE WATER RATES FOR THE ORO
VALLEY WATER UTILITY
Water Utility Administrator Shirley Seng reviewed the Council Communication. She
explained that the Resolution approving the Notice of Intention to increase existing potable
water rates, establish Groundwater Preservation Fee and establish a Reclaimed Water Rate
was approved by the Council on August 20, 2003. She reviewed the public comments that
were received and the answers provided to those comments. Ms. Seng then explained that if a
Reclaimed System was not constructed, the Water Utility would have to: step up work on
bringing CAP to the Town, reapply for an assured water supply designation,revise the
Potable Water System Master Plan, increase proposed capital improvements to existing
system to address capacity issues, and replace reclaimed water resources.
Ms. Seng reported that Potable Water Rates fund the operating and maintenance costs of the
potable water system plus capital costs for existing system improvements. The recommended
Potable Water Rates for a 5/8 inch by3/4 inch meter would be:
• Monthly Base Rate=$12.30
o Tier 1 =$1.92/1000 gals. usage=0— 10,000 gallons
o Tier 2 = $2.55/1000 gals usage= 10,001 —25,000 gallons
o Tier 3 = $3.25/1000 gals. usage over 25,000 gallons
She explained that 90% of the Water Utility customers use the 5/8 inch by 3/4 inch meter with
(h) the average usage at 10,000 gallons per month. This would equate to an average monthly
increase of 50 cents.
10/01/03 Minutes,Town Council Regular Session 7
Ms. Seng reviewed the Groundwater Preservation Fee proposal. She explained that:
• Aquifers are declining at a steady pace.
• Groundwater is a finite natural resource,
• We have a responsibility to conserve groundwater resources for future generations.
• Everyone who consumes groundwater has contributed to the depletion of the aquifer.
• Everyone should contribute to the cost to bring renewable water to the Town in an
effort to preserve groundwater.
• Preservation Fee will finance delivery systems that will provide renewable water
supplies.
• Recommended Rate: All customers (potable and reclaimed)will be assessed the fee of
21 cents per 1,000 gallons of water used, Cost for average resident=$2.10 per month.
Ms. Seng also reviewed the Reclaimed Water Rate proposal explaining that:
• This will fund the operating and maintenance expenses of the reclaimed system plus a
portion of reclaimed capital costs.
• Recommended Rate: Equal to Tier 1 of potable water rate.
• Only reclaimed water customers pay.
• After all existing golf courses are on the system, it is recommended that a 10%
discount be applied.
Ms. Seng explained that all fees will be reviewed on an annual basis. She also reviewed
charts depicting"Impacts to Customers", "Rate Comparisons with Other Cities and Towns"
and"Who is Paying for the Reclaimed System." She then explained that any rates adopted by
the Council would become effective on November 1st.
Dr. Leo Leonhart, 11435 N. Flying Bird Drive,Vice Chair of the Water Utility Commission
and Chairman of Renewable Water Resources Subcommittee, stated that the proposed action
would enable the Water Utility to offset a significant percentage of the Town's demand for
high quality,potable water that is now being pumped for the aquifer. He stated that the Water
Utility and the Commission have carefully debated the fairness and relevance of alternative
financing schemes for the project and that the proposal represents their best efforts to provide
a"fair and balanced approach." He stated that the consideration should be for who benefits
and not necessarily who pays. Dr. Leonhart urged the Council to adopt the reclaimed water
proposal stating that it was a positive measure.
In response to questions from the Council, Mr. Forrest and/or Ms. Seng explained:
• Assured water supply is typically renewed every ten years,unless other factors(i.e.
growth greater than projections)come into place.
• Golf courses will typically use more water when on the reclaimed water system in
order to leach additional salts out that are present in the reclaimed water. One local
golf course has stated that they use about 15%more water now that they are using
reclaimed water.
• Must have reclaimed water rates in place in order for bonding to move forward.
Customers will not be paying the rates for at least two years, so there is time to
L.0) research numbers to see if any adjustments need to be made.
•
•
10/01/03 Minutes,Town Council Regular Session • 8
• Reclaimed Water is not typically set up with tiered rates. This acts as an incentive to
people who are not required to use reclaimed water to go ahead and access the system.
• If the property owner requested water service from the Town,and they have an
existing well on their property,they would be asked to abandon the well per State law
and Arizona Department of Environmental Quality requirements as they do not allow
interconnection of different systems.
• Extra monies from the Groundwater Preservation Fee could be used to purchase CAP
water,to build dams in the CDO wash to collect water to recharge the aquifer,etc.
• No credits or compensation were given to golf courses in lieu of paying for potable
water infrastructure.
Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing.
Bill Adler, 10720 N. Eagle Eye Place,disagreed with Dr. Leonhart's comment regarding the
fact that it was unimportant who pays. He stated that commercial users can pass the increase
onto their customers,but the homeowner can not absorb those costs in the same way. He
stated that it was a disproportionate rate to the homeowners to charge them 40 percent,when
it should be no more than 10— 15 percent. He stated that he felt that commercial
developments did not pay for themselves and that impact fees have always been calculated at
an artificially low level.
Gordon Byrnes,member of the Water Utility Commission and Golf Course Superintendent
for the El Conquistador Country Club, stated that the Country Club is currently paying$1.92
L101 per 1,000 gallons of water used. He stated that the Groundwater Preservation Fee would add
Water Rate would increase their cost another 46 cents per
21 cents to that and the Reclaimed
1,000 gallons. Then there would be additional costs incurred to treat algae in ponds,higher
PH in reclaimed water,etc. He stated that when all is considered,they are looking at an
approximate increase of 50%. He asked that the scenarios be revisited.
Doug McKee, 11836 Cassiopeia, thanked the Town staff for their help in understanding the
economics and factors involved in the proposals. He stated that the incentive for investing in
the Reclaimed Water System is primarily to meet the State's requirements. He stated that one
of those requirements is for new development to show that they are mostly using renewable
water resources. He also stated that everyone has to stabilize the groundwater levels and there
is the potential to pay huge fines if these requirements are not met. He also stated that new
development would come to a halt if reclaimed water or CAP was not put into place. Mr.
McKee asked that more equitable shares be assigned to future developers as new development
should pay for a greater portion of the costs rather than the existing customers.
Mayor Loomis closed the public hearing.
MOTION: Council Member Johnson MOVED to APPROVE Resolution(R)03-89
establishing a Groundwater Preservation Fee, establishing a Reclaimed Water Rate and
increasing existing Potable Water Rates for the Oro Valley Water Utility as identified in
Exhibit"A"of said Resolution. Council Member Rochman SECONDED the motion.
10/01/03 Minutes,Town Council Regular Session 9
DISCUSSION:
Council Member Abbott commented that everyone wants to see the golf courses off of
Li) groundwater,but she was troubled with the rate structure: She stated that residents would not
really be able to connect to the reclaimed water system and since they are paying for the
system, don't they have a right to be connected to it? She also stated that she did not agree
with the Tier system as it seemed to be punitive to residents and generous to commercial users
since commercial users can pass fees on to their customers and residents can not. She also
questioned why the Town couldn't just ban use of the groundwater on golf courses.
•
In response to a question from Mayor Loomis regarding connection to the reclaimed water
system,Mr. Forrest explained that there was nothing that would restrict anyone from
connecting to the system. He stated that as long as one met the State's standards for using it
and applying it,then there would be no reason why anyone could not utilize the reclaimed
water if they chose to..
Council Member Johnson stated that the reclaimed water rates apply to all large turf areas(2
acres and above)which would include Town parks, school playgrounds, etc. He stated that
the Town and the school could only pass this on by assessing taxes etc. He said that golf
courses were easy targets;however,the golf courses provide a lot of sales tax revenue and a
quality of life for the Town's residents. He also noted that we do live in the desert and water
is relatively cheap compared to other areas of the country. He stated that the proposals have
been studied extensively by the Water Utility Commission and the proposal represents a
balance. He stated that the Town will continue to evaluate the water rates.
60) Council Member Rochman stated it is certain that we must bring in additional water into the
Town. He also stated that there are many benefits to the Town brought about from those
people that utilize the golf courses, etc.
Mayor Loomis thanked the Water Utility Commission, staff and the consultant for their
efforts on the project. He stated that the Council identified working towards a Reclaimed
Water System as a top priority. He stated that the Commission, staff and consultant have
worked hard to find a good cost for the system, a good cost to operate the system,how to
adjust those costs to the public and the users and how it will be paid for.
MOTION CARRIED, 3 — 1 with Council Member Abbott opposed.
Mayor Loomis recessed the meeting at 9:40 p.m. The meeting resumed at 9:50 p.m.
5. PUBLIC HEARING-ORDINANCE NO. (0)03-32 AN ORDINANCE
TRANSLATING THE ZONING FOR THE NEWLY ANNEXED AREA COMMONLY
KNOWN AS AREA "B" FROM PIMA COUNTY ZONING DESIGNATIONS TO
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY DESIGNATIONS AND AMENDING THE TOWN OF
ORO VALLEY ZONING MAP: AND REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN
CONFLICT HEREWITH
Community Development Director Brent Sinclair reported that on April 7, 2003 the Town
annexed 654.7 acres commonly known as "Area B". He explained that in accordance with
State Statutes, the Town is now required to translate the zoning on the annexed properties
10/01/03 Minutes,Town Council Regular Session 10
from its original zoning designation to the closest comparable Oro Valley zoning designation..
He explained that approval of Ordinance(0)03-32 would translate the zoning of seventeen
lord ' (17) areas and the inclusion of specific conditions would insure that specific rights are
maintained on particular properties. Mr. Sinclair also explained that the previous adoption of
Resolution(R)03-68 by the Town Council in August,2002 would ensure that livestock rights
would be maintained on properties in the newly annexed area.
In response to a question from Council Member Abbott,Mr. Sinclair explained that the
property owners that were directly affected were notified of the translational zoning as
required by State law. Property owners outside the area were not notified; however, if it were
a rezoning issue, then all property owners within 600 feet would have been notified.
Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing.
Don Laidlaw, Laidlaw Consultants,2841 E 3'1, stated that there was a technicality involving a
property south of the rear service area of the shopping center located on the southeast corner
of Magee. He explained that two properties are separated by a 20-foot County alley right-of-
way. He stated that the RS zoning contains a provision that requires a 20-foot setback from
an alley, along the side yard. He explained that the subject property contains.some areas of
floodplain, some areas of vegetation, and the developable area of the property is very narrow.
Mr. Laidlaw explained that a 20-foot setback would reduce the developable area for a
building down to a depth of 20-25 foot maximum. He stated that the County TR zoning only
required a 7-foot side yard setback and also allowed the Administrator to reduce that down to
zero: Mr. Laidlaw stated that he just wanted to make it a matter of record, and the remedy for
hid the property would be either to seek a variance from the Board of Adjustment or to apply for a
rezoning for the property sometime in the future. He then commended the staff for all that
they did to carry out the annexation process.
Mayor Loomis closed the public hearing.
MOTION: Council Member Rochman MOVED to ADOPT Ordinance (0)03-32,translating
the zoning from Pima County to the Town of Oro Valley zoning districts for"Area B"as
annexed by Ordinance(0)03-09 adopted April 7, 2003. Council Member Johnson
SECONDED the motion. Motion carried,4—0.
COUNCIL REPORTS—No reports.
TOWN MANAGER'S REPORT—No report.
DEPARTMENT HEAD REPORTS —No reports.
CALL TO AUDIENCE- No speakers.
ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Council Member Johnson MOVED to ADJOURN AT 10:05 p.m. Council
Member Abbott SECONDED the motion. Motion carried 4—0.
10/01/03 Minutes;Town Council Regular Session 11
Respectfully submitted,
Roxana Garrity,CMC
Deputy Town Clerk
I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the
regular session of the Town of Oro Valley Council of Oro Valley, Arizona held on the 1st
day of October 2003. 'I further certify that the meeting was duly called and held and that a
quorum was present.
Dated this / ' day of OL k ,2003.
Kath E.Cuvelier,CMC
Town Clerk
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY �---� c,`' &, �'�— '---
11000 N. LA CANADA DR. "`�� \ �. P M `� "�
ORO VALLEY,ARIZONA 85737 �!', i �?E PA,: ry
......... r44..k..gvtic c......0)1/4Sji
225143310
LAMBROS STEV RLOFF LAURIE JT/RS
8305 N AU NIKOLAS CT
TUC AZ Y41.
85704-0000
Nov
?Oaf
2.
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: September 2,2003
TO: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
FROM: David Ronquillo, Planner I
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: OV9-03-21, TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY
TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY EQUIVALENT FOR THE ANNEXED AREA
LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF NORTHERN AVENUE AND
CAMINO CORTARO FROM PIMA COUNTY CR-4 (MIXED DWELLING TYPE
ZONE) TO THE TOWN'S R-4 (TOWNHOUSE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT)
DESIGNATION FOR PARCEL NUMBERS; 225-142-770, 225-142-780, 225-142-790, 225-
142-800, 225-143-440, 225-143-420, 225-143-310, 225-143-320, 225-143-330, 225-143-300,
225-143-290 225-143-280, 225-143-270, 225-143-260, 225-143-250, 225-143-240, 225-143-
410, 225-143-400, 225-143-340, 225-143-390, 225-143-380, 225-143-370, 225-143-360, 225-
143-350, 225-143-430, 225-142-810, 225-142-820, 225-142-830, 225-142-840, 225-142-850�
225-142-860, 225-142-870, 225-142-880, 225-142-890, 225-142-900, 225-142-910, 225-142-
920, 225-142-930, 225-142-940, 225-142-950, 225-142-960, 225-142-970, 225-142-980, 225-
142-990, 225-143-000, 225-143-010, 225-143-020, 225-143-030, 225-143-040, 225-143-050,
225-43-060, 225-143-070, 225-143-080, 225-143-090, 225-143-100, 225-143-110, 225-143-120,
225-143-130, 225-143-140, 225-143-150, 225-143-160, 225-143-170, 225-143-180, 225-143-
190, 225-143-200, 25-143-210, 225-143-220, 225-143-230
BACKGROUND:
On May 7, 2003, the Town of Oro Valley annexed the above referenced area as part of a larger annexation of
land called "Area B" (Ordinance No. (0) 03-09). The attached map identifies the location of the area and the
current and proposed zoning designations.
In accordance with State Statutes, the Town is required to change or "translate" the zoning on the annexed
properties from its original zoning designation to the closest comparable Oro Valley zoning designation.
Section 9-471(L) of the Arizona Revised Statutes (ARS) states:
"A city or town annexing an area shall adopt zoning classifications which permit densities and uses no
greater than those permitted by the county immediately before annexation. Subsequent changes in
zoning of the annexed territory shall be made according to existing procedures established by the city or
town for the rezoning of land."
SUMMARY:
The Pima County zoning designation for this area is Multiple Dwelling Type Zone (CR-4) and the most similar
Oro Valley zoning district is R-4 (Town House Residential). The existing use is single family residential.
F:\ov\ov9\2003\9-03-21\PZ.RPT.doc
• •
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Page 2
OVERVIEW OF THE PROPOSED TRANSLATIONAL ZONES:
Pima County CR-4
The Pima County CR-4 zone allows for general residential providing for single detached dwellings, duplex and
multiple dwellings units. The minimum lot area in this district is 7,000 square feet for single family dwellings
and 3,000 to 5,000 square feet for multiple dwellings. The lots in this subdivision range in size from 4,700
square feet to 5,500 square feet.
The CR-4 zoning permits building heights at a maximum of thirty-four 34'. The county building heights should
be maintained because the area has already been built out utilizing this standard. A major concern of the
property owners was that the height of buildings be maintained when annexed.
Town of Oro Valley R-4
The Town's R-4 district allows for single family dwellings attached or detached with a minimum lots area of
5,450 square feet. The maximum building height for this district is 25'. Since there is a significant difference
between the building height standards, it is recommended that the Pima County standard of 34' be maintained in
order to enable consistent development in the future.
GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE:
The Town's current 1996 TOV General Plan designation in this area ranges from Low Density Residential (.4-.5
DU/ac) to Medium High Density Residential (5.0-10.1 DU/ac). The uses in these categories are primarily for
residential purposes from single family dwellings to multiple family attached dwellings. The existing
residential use conforms with the General Plan.
The Town's proposed 2020 General Plan (adopted by Town Council but not yet ratified by the voters)
designates this area as High Density Residential (5+ DU/ac). The existing use conforms to the General Plan.
NOTIFICATION:
All property owners within the annexed area have been notified of this proposed translational zoning and the
area was posted in accordance with Town and State statutes. To date, no comments have been received.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission approve the translational zoning from Pima County
CR-4 (Multiple Dwelling Type Zone) to the Oro Valley R-4 (Townhouse Residential District) for the proposed
parcels.
F:\ov\ov9\2003\9-03-21\PZ.RPT.doc
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Page 3
SUGGESTED MOTIONS:
The Planning and Zoning Commission may wish to consider one of the following motions:
I move to recommend that Town Council approve OV9-03-21, translating the zoning from Pima County CR-4
(Multiple Dwelling Type Zone) to Oro Valley R-4 (Townhouse Residents) for the proposed parcels, with a
condition that the County CR-4 building height be maintained by the Town.✓✓
OR
I move to recommend that Town Council approve OV9-03-21, translating the zoning from Pima County CR-4
(Multiple Dwelling Type Zone) to Oro Valley R-4 (Townhouse Residential) for the proposed parcels, with a
condition that the County CR-4 building height be maintained by the Town, and the following added
conditions:
Attachment:
1. Property location
2. Current &Proposed Zoning Map
/4144
Plannyhg and ZoningAdministrator
F:\ov\ov9\2003\9-03-21\PZ.RPT.doc
WM
07.....,....,",..,,,„,,, ..
....
,,..
1 /1:4•1,1,7
..: ., :, Ot9-03-,4 I 1
ff 4
>,.„..
x 1
/
kl
'kk*t.0,4
'01,490,0,,,,,Mgin„W&V.r,,rek,
41W°' I I
x. I
t I I
rm. 1,1 7. I i ,•
if I I
II
i k
e.
1 I I
..
Ill I 1,, OV9-03-09 $ Li
....p OV9-03-08 k..4
I I<
/
l" t l,
OV90,1(-2 , / OV9-03-17 0..
gi CO
11
IM IX, 1
2 Z .
P 1 I
II,L1J I I
0 9-03-13 '
I fvl—: rii 1 1
....— i
1 0
Li 1 1
....Z i;
A
111 YA 1,1 44,1.1.3.00.
13:41.10.11`..r iIMWASIVAM...114,.......85.3..a.....16.,..54.6,......4060.64i1144,.....14.3....tegaStak..2.4.U.....,....inieelia,...,
k,i P‘0, VA.IVir '
wir L w
I OV9-03-23
ea: 3-14
1 P OV9-03-1 8 i OV9-0 3-09 I I
4 i ,....„4,..
.... q;
4 1 :
r,...
1111 ',•..40[..-...v.......poeffralassimo.u.ag3a4,
am
imitomar,,,,awo.,takm.,461a.4.4.,,,,,........,..........m...,,,,.......,,,,,,, ,,..,..n..4.1wwas,vottit...4v3...o...Basam.....,,,,,,,,kma,wve............4,,j
MAGEE ROAD
N. . ,-,..„.......:,z.........y 4,;—...........—,,,,,...---.....,..,---..—., ..., ,z.r..x.,—...— ,,,,,o..—...,.,..,„.,,?,.,,—
110-031112 i
# a ii A 1
0
V..
f .4r ti 0 11
• ci ,,,,,,
„ 1
OV9-03-07 0 ,,,o,. OV9-03-1 9 ,P, ',°•
.....S7 i tj Pli al p
1 ;.A
1 1 gA 1
Fts
,i......... ::
k..,
i""••• U
..tA
-,---1--- 0.
=g ,/ OV903-1. A—
9 4 OV9-03-05 fi -
A,44.............0 .ii, ....
v a II
II
....
,' CiV9-03-21
I ',
! 0V9-03-1 0
i 11:11.
..... g k II
.. 4
Ism 1 e 1.N
I ' 1 r.r.f. , '.
I ,,...
,,,..
.
II i 1 4V9-03-06
r—
k...
II 0 4w .iot pi ::
.
Lir
OVP03-1 3 oG:07:4 :
i'',:."A r-,,,7 . .4,,,--.-----—--...."..''......"-"""'-""-"-""'".'"""'"'"'""*""'"""^"*"""" '''''''""‘"""""""*"",1"*"*"..!'7",,,7,71%.ri="•".".""""."..'":=,!!:="""r"::=4.
v OV9-104•14
Cjialit=444
• Translational Zoning Location Map
W CAMINO DEL ORO
Pima County CR-4 Zoning ,c,°GAS
to Oro Valley R-4 Zoning p.iii
0 N C,& eOh,„
4.10
Z Cr
50
i\\j W CAMINO CORTARO
O {
Q NIN MORNING DR
aP I - -Vo T TTE DR ' Z
WCPw I s ALIN g0
S E CAT SyAO
1 -Tr q
C./.
- O{tis eI_
i
z
I z
O
rn OLLA SHADOWS DR P�-
4-4 I z ECH `SAP
J
W PASEO NORTENO I 4 RRANEAN DR E M
1
d OR 0I AIN VsEOUN I ° ii
° CI.,�F
C.) 0 Ca: ,' CI
Q O a vr
2 E FOURNO� '�A�R
W COOL DRI a Z
Lau-
: eMADRID DR
I
w W COOL DR
cp
i a
z
W CALLEC
1
.
1
{
.
i
W MAGEE RD E MAGEE RD
i
Y•
O V9 - 03 - 21 Translational Zoning
AFFIDAVIT Pr. 4UBLICATION
STATE OF ARIZONA)
ss. AUG 2 0 2003
COUNTY OF PIMA )
KAREN BR I GHAM being first
duly sworn, deposes and says that (he) (she) is the Legal Advertising Manager
of THE DAILY TERRITORIAL, a daily newspaper printed and published in the
County of Pima, State of:Arizona, and of general circulation in the City of Tuc-
son,
County of Pima, State of Arizona and elsewhere, and the hereto attached
0V9+-03—21
PUBLIC NOTICE
was printed and published correctly in the regular and entire issue of said THE
DAILY TERRITORIAL for issues; that was first made
1 4t h AUGUST !..
on the day of 1 4t�i 20
and the last publication thereof was made on the day of
AUGUST 03
20 ; that said publication
civi Gn4dd4 each of the following dates, to-wit:
Request of
TOWN OF ORO. VALLEY
Daily Territorial
By di/ ,th%„0,-
/a/
Subscribed and sworn to before me hts 1 day of
AUGUST
20
03
ry • or ;r
bTary n of tat f Arizona
Expires June 15.
My Commission Expire/
is.0 //5 A 2 -
r
•
• NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
BEFORE THE ORO VALLEY
PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION
In accordance with ARS 9-462 and Section 3-108 of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Re-
vised,NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FOR A RE-
CENTLY ANNEXED PROPERTY BEFORE THE ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND
ZONING COMMISSION IS HEREBY GIVEN:
TIME:at or after 6:00 p.m.on TUESDAY,SEPTEMBER 2,2003
PLACE:Oro Valley Town Hall,Council Chambers 11,000 North La Canada Drive Oro
Valley,Arizona
SUBJECT:PUBLIC HEARING:OV9-03-21,TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA
COUNTY TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY EQUIVALENT FOR THE ANNEXED
AREA LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF NORTHERN AVENUE AND
CAMINO CORTARO FROM PIMA COUNTY CR-4(MIXED DWELLING TYPE ZONE)
TO THE TOWN'S R-4(TOWNHOUSE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT)DESIGNATION
FOR PARCEL NUMBERS;225-142-770,225-142-780,225-142-790,225-142-800,
225-143-440,225-143-420,225-143-310,225-143-320,225-143-330,225-143-300,
225-143-290 225-143-280,225-143-270,225-143-260,225-143-250,225-143-240,
225-143-410,225-143-400,225-143-340,225-143-390,225-143-380,225-143-370,
225-143-360,225-143-350,225-143-430,225-142-810,225-142-820,225-142-830,
225-142-840,225-142-850,225-142-860,225-142-870,225-142-880,225-142-890,
225-142-900,225-142-910,225-142-920,225-142-930,225-142-940,225-142-950,
225-142-960,225-142-970,225-142-980,225-142-990,225-143-000,225-143-010,
225-143-020,225-143-030,225-143-040,225-143-050,225-43-060,225-143-070,
225-143-080,225-143-090,225-143-100,225-143-110,225-143-120,225-143-130,
225-143-140,225-143-150,225-143-160,225-143-170,225-143-180,225-143-190,
225-143-200,25-143-210,225-143-220,225-143-230
This property was annexed to the Town on May 7,2003 and, in accordance with
State Statutes,the Town is required to change,or"translate",the zoning on annexed
properties to the closest comparable zoning district within the new jurisdiction.
Members of the public are invited to this meeting and will be given an opportunity to
speak. An agenda for the meeting will be made available 24 hours prior to meeting
time. Should you have any questions regarding this mater,please contact David
Ronquillo,Planner I,at 229-4817 or dronquillo@orovalley.net/s/Bayer Vella,ACIP
Senior Planner
Pub:The Daily Territorial
August 14,2003
Req:Town of Oro Valley
pnov9-03-21 kb
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
BEFORE THE ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING COMIVIISSION
In accordance with ARS 9-462 and Section 3-108 of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised, NOTICE OF
PUBLIC HEARING FOR TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FOR A RECENTLY ANNEXED PROPERTY
BEFORE THE ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING COMNIISSION IS HEREBY GIVEN:
TIME: at or after 6:00 p. m. on TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 2, 2003
PLACE: Oro Valley Town Hall, Council Chambers
11,000 North La Canada Drive
Oro Valley, Arizona
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: OV9-03-21, TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM
PIMA COUNTY TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY EQUIVALENT FOR
THE ANNEXED AREA LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF
NORTHERN AVENUE AND CAMINO CORTARO FROM PIMA COUNTY
CR-4 (MIXED DWELLING TYPE ZONE) TO THE TOWN'S R-4
(TOWNHOUSE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT) DESIGNATION FOR
PARCEL NUMBERS; 225-142-770, 225-142-780, 225-142-790, 225-142-800,
225-143-440, 225-143-420, 225-143-310, 225-143-320, 225-143-330, 225-143-
300, 225-143-290 225-143-280, 225-143-270, 225-143-260, 225-143-250, 225-
143-240, 225-143-410, 225-143-400, 225-143-340, 225-143-390, 225-143-380,
225-143-370, 225-143-360, 225-143-350, 225-143-430, 225-142-810, 225-142-
820, 225-142-830, 225-142-840, 225-142-850, 225-142-860, 225-142-870, 225-
142-880, 225-142-890, 225-142-900, 225-142-910, 225-142-920, 225-142-930,
225-142-940, 225-142-950, 225-142-960, 225-142-970, 225-142-980, 225-142-
990, 225-143-000, 225-143-010, 225-143-020, 225-143-030, 225-143-040, 225-
143-050, 225-43-060, 225-143-070, 225-143-080, 225-143-090,225-143-100, 225-
143-110, 225-143-120, 225-143-130, 225-143-140, 225-143-150, 225-143-160,
225-143-170, 225-143-180, 225-143-190, 225-143-200, 25-143-210, 225-143-220,
225-143-230
This property was annexed to the Town on May 7, 2003 and, in accordance with
State Statutes, the Town is required to change, or "translate", the zoning on
annexed properties to the closest comparable zoning district within the new
jurisdiction.
Members of the public are invited to this meeting and will be given an opportunity to speak. An agenda
for the meeting will be made available 24 hours prior to meeting time. Should you have any questions
rega ng this mater, please contact David Ronquillo, Planner I, at 229-4817 or donquillo@orovalley.net
Posted: 8-12-03
Time: 4 : 30 p.m.
Ba ella, ACIP By: sg
Senior Planner
F:\OV\OV9\2003\9-03-21\PZ.PUBLIC.NOTICE.doc
APPROVED MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR SESSION
SEPTEMBER 2, 2003
TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS
11000 NORTH LA CANADA DRIVE
REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Vice Chair Cox, Acting Chair
Commissioner Kinared
Commissioner Manross
Commissioner Krenkowitz
Commissioner Anning
EXCUSED: Chair Moody
Commissioner Bistany
Others Present: Mayor Paul Loomis
Werner Wolff, Council Member
Jeff Weir, Economic Development Administrator
Mark Langlitz, Town Attorney
Scott Nelson, Special Projects Coordinator
Bill Adler, Board of Adjustments
Bayer Vella, AICP, Senior Planner
MINUTES
MOTION: Commissioner Kinared MOVED to approve the August 5, 2003 Planning
and Zoning Commission meeting minutes as written. Commissioner Manross
seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-0.
CALL TO THE AUDIENCE OPENED: 6:03 P.M.
Bill Adler, 10720 N. Eagle Eye PI., Oro Valley, wanted to point out that Mixed Use
is not, nor has ever been, an approved land use designation in any Oro Valley
general plan. It has been directed by Council to be removed from the General
Plan pending ratification of the voters. The problem is that Mixed Use is in our
zoning code. It exists in many of the commercial designations and residential
designations. There is a contradiction between the General Plan and the Zoning
Code. He believes this needs to be reconciled. A joint study session with Town
Council should be requested, with DRB included. He asked that the Commission
make a good faith effort to get with the Council and resolve this so there is
uniformity.
September 2,2003 Approved P&Z Meeting Minutes
CALL TO THE AUDIENCE CLOSED: 6:06 P.M.
1. PUBLIC HEARING: OV8-03-05, DANIELA SHOUSE, REPRESENTING TORINO
RISTORANTE ITALIANO, REQUESTS APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT FOR THE SALE OF LIQUOR ASSOCIATED WITH A FULL-SERVICE
RESTAURANT LOCATED WITHIN THE CANADA CROSSROADS SHOPPING
CENTER IN A C-N (NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL) DISTRICT AT THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LA CANADA DRIVE AND LAMBERT LANE, A
PORTION OF PARCEL NO. 224-39-OO1E.
Mr. Vella presented his Staff Report for OV8-03-05. The applicant wants to establish a 2,400
square foot restaurant and is in the process of receiving building permits to do so. He is
requesting the ability to offer a full bar with beer, wine and liquor with hours of operation from
11 A.M. to 11 P.M. There are two other restaurants in the shopping center that currently have
similar liquor licenses and have been in place for 2-3 years.
Applicant, Mr. Shouse, who owns of Café Torino, stated that he has operated the restaurant since
January, 2001. They would like expand their facilities to offer more upscale dining for the area.
They hope they can go forward with the liquor license. The restaurant should be open by about
October 20.
Mr. Vella responded to Commissioner Kinared that of the two conditions in Exhibit A, condition
#1 is worded differently than what was specified on Page 1 of the report. Condition #2 varies
slightly by allowing the time to be from 11 A.M. to 11 P.M., seven days a week.
Mr. Vella told Commissioner Krenkowitz that the language in the CUP recommended on
11/13/2001 and Exhibit A should be the same.
PUBLIC HEARING OPENED AND CLOSED AT 6:10 P.M.: No Speakers.
MOTION: Commissioner Krenkowitz MOVED to recommend approval of OV8-03-05,
Torino Ristorante Italiano's request for a conditional use permit to serve liquor, with the
conditions listed in Exhibit A, with one change: that paragraph 1 as now stated be deleted
and in place of that be inserted, "that recorded or live outside entertainment must not be
allowed." Commissioner Kinared seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-0.
2. DISCUSSION ITEM: OVERVIEW OF THE RECENTLY ANNEXED
PROPERTIES NEAR THE INTERSECTION OF ORACLE AND MAGEE ROADS AND
THE TRANSLATIONAL ZONING PROCESS
Mr. Vella stated that item #2 was to present an overview of the history of annexation, where we
are today and what are the legal parameters of the translational zoning process.
Mr. Scott Nelson presented an overview of the annexation process which allows for
municipalities to go through a process for one year to gather 50% plus 1 of the total property
owners of an area and 50% plus 1 for the total assessed value of an area. On area B, the process
ended on April 4, 2003. As of that date, we had 53% of the property owners and 67% of the total
2
September 2,2003 Approved P&Z Meeting Minutes
assessed value. This area is unique with great diversity with subdivisions greater than 30 years
old. The area included condos, residential, townhouses, apartments, commercial zones and a
school. The total area size is 655 acres with a population of 2,234 and 120 plus businesses.
During the annexation process, there were applicants that came to us requesting pre-annexation
agreements, which went before the Commission and Town Council and were acted on. The
letters in your packet were for certain areas that wanted to retain their developmental rights that
they had in the County.
Attorney Mark Langlitz stated that this annexation has been a lengthy process and is at a point
where it has been completed with regard to any legal action that was taken. The Town has
prevailed on that. This is one of the largest areas that the Town has annexed with a wide variety
of uses. It is now necessary that the Town translate the zoning from the existing County to the
Town zoning---keeping in mind that the property owners should retain their existing rights under
the County zoning. The Town will translate to the closest existing comparable districts so long
as it does not increase the use or intensity. Staff has looked at all the individual parcels and has
determined which is the most appropriate Town zoning district for the property to be translated
to. The nature of the action this evening is administrative as opposed to legislative. This is
required by statute.
Acting Chair Cox stated that for the sake of expedience, items #3 through 19 on the revised
agenda basically have the same type of administrative action that needs to be taken He asks the
Commissioners and the audience if the process could be varied so that all Staff Reports were
presented at once and then hold a public hearing for all items at once. Voting on the items #3
through 19 would be done separately after the public hearing and any comments. There were no
objections to this suggested process from either the Commissioners or the audience.
3. PUBLIC HEARING: OV9-03-21, TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA
COUNTY TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY EQUIVALENT FOR THE ANNEXED
AREA LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF NORTHERN AVENUE AND
CAMINO CORTARO FROM PIMA COUNTY CR-4 (MIXED DWELLING TYPE
ZONE) TO THE TOWN'S R-4 (TOWNHOUSE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT)
DESIGNATION FOR PARCEL NUMBERS; 225-142-770, 225-142-780, 225-142-790, 225-
142-800, 225-143-440, 225-143-420, 225-143-310, 225-143-320, 225-143-330, 225-143-300,
225-143-290 225-143-280, 225-143-270, 225-143-260, 225-143-250, 225-143-240, 225-143-
410, 225-143-400, 225-143-340, 225-143-390, 225-143-380, 225-143-370, 225-143-360, 225-
143-350, 225-143-430, 225-142-810, 225-142-820, 225-142-830, 225-142-840, 225-142-850,
225-142-860, 225-142-870, 225-142-880, 225-142-890, 225-142-900, 225-142-910, 225-142-
920, 225-142-930, 225-142-940, 225-142-950, 225-142-960, 225-142-970, 225-142-980, 225-
142-990, 225-143-000, 225-143-010, 225-143-020, 225-143-030, 225-143-040, 225-143-050,
225-43-060, 225-143-070, 225-143-080, 225-143-090, 225-143-100, 225-143-110, 225-143-120,
225-143-130, 225-143-140, 225-143-150, 225-143-160, 225-143-170, 225-143-180, 225-143-
190, 225-143-200, 25-143-210, 225-143-220, 225-143-230
4. PUBLIC HEARING: OV9-03-08, TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA
COUNTY TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY EQUIVALENT FOR THE ANNEXED
AREA LOCATED BETWEEN ORACLE ROAD AND NORTHERN AVENUE, NORTH
OF COOL DRIVE FROM PIMA COUNTY TR (TRANSITIONAL ZONE) TO THE
TOWN'S R-S (RESIDENTIAL SERVICE DISTRICT) DESIGNATION FOR PARCEL
3
September 2,2003 Approved P&Z Meeting Minutes
NUMBERS; 225-141-890, 225-142-740, 225-142-730, 225-142-720, 225-142-710, 225-142-
700, 225-142-750, 225-142-690, 225-142-680, 225-142-670, 225-142-660, 225-142-540, 225-
142-530, 225-142-760, 225-142-550, 225-142-560, 225-142-750, 225-142-570, 225-142-580,
225-142-760, 225-142-600, 225-142-590, 225-142-760, 225-142-610, 225-142-620, 225-142-
630, 225-142-640, 225-142-650, 225-141-850, 225-141-830, 225-162-820, 225-162-810, 225-
162-800, 225-162-190, 225-162-080, 225-162-090, 225-162-200, 229-143-480, 225-143-490,
225-143-500, 225-143-510, 225-143-540, 225-143-520, 225-143-530, 225-143-460, 225-143-
470, 225-143-460, 225-161-640, 225-161-650, 225-161-860, 225-161-870, 225-161-850, 225-
161-840, 225-161-670, 225-161-660, 225-161-680, 225-161-690, 225-161-820, 225-161-830,
225-161-810, 225-161-800, 225-161-710, 225-161-700, 225-161-790, 225-161-780, 225-161-
730, 225-161-720, 225-161-740, 225-161-750, 225-161-760, 225-161-770, 225-162-790, 225-
162-780, 225-162-760, 225-162-770, 225-162-730, 225-162-720, 225-162-750, 225-162-740,
225-162-710, 225-162-700, 225-162-690, 25-162-680, 225-162-660, 225-162-670, 225-162-
650, 225-162-640, 225-162-810, 225-162-590, 225-162-600, 225-162-570, 225-162-580, 225-
162-550, 225-162-540, 225-162-620, 225-162-560, 225-162-630, 225-162-610, 225-162-410,
225-162-400, 225-162-390, 225-162-420, 225-162-370, 225-162-430, 225-162-380, 225-162-
440, 225-162-460, 225-162-470, 225-162-450, 225-162-350, 225-162-480, 225-162-490, 225-
162-360, 225-162-500, 225-162-510, 225-162-330, 225-162-520, 225-162-530, 225-162-340,
225-162-320, 225-162-310, 225-162-270, 225-162-260, 225-162-300, 225-162-280, 225-162-
290, 225-162-230, 225-162-210, 225-162-220, 225-162-240, 225-162-250, 225-162-170, 225-
162-180, 225-162-190, 225-162-150, 225-162-160, 225-162-140, 225-162-100, 225-162-110,
225-162-120, 225-162-130, 225-161-990, 225-161-980, 225-161-970, 225-161-960, 225-162-
010, 225-162-000, 225-162-950, 225-161-940, 225-162-030, 225-162-020, 225-162-930, 225-
161-920, 225-162-050, 225-162-040, 225-162-910, 225-161-900, 225-162-060, 225-162-070,
225-161-890, 225-161-880
5. PUBLIC HEARING: OV9-03-14, TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA
COUNTY TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY EQUIVALENT FOR THE ANNEXED
AREA, LOCATED BETWEEN ORACLE ROAD AND NORTHERN AVENUE, NORTH
OF MAGEE ROAD FROM PIMA COUNTY CB-1 (LOCAL BUSINESS ZONE)
DESIGNATION TO THE TOWN'S C-2 (COMMERCIAL DISTRICT) DESIGNATION
WITH CONDITIONS FOR PARCEL NUMBERS; 225-143-480, 225-143-550 (PORTION),
AND FOR THE ANNEXED AREA LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ORACLE
ROAD SOUTH OF CAMINO CORTARO FOR PARCELS 225-141-740, 225-141-770, 225-
141-780, 225, 225-141-76B, 225-141-76A, 225-141-750, 225-141-80A, 225-141-92C
(PORTION), 225-141-170C, 225-141-70A, 225-141-70B, 225-141-710 AND 225-141-73A;
6. PUBLIC HEARING: OV9-03-22, TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA
COUNTY TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY EQUIVALENT FOR THE ANNEXED
AREA, LOCATED ONE QUARTER MILE NORTH FROM THE INTERSECTION OF
ORACLE ROAD AND MAGEE ROAD ON THE WEST SIDE OF ORACLE ROAD
FROM PIMA COUNTY SR (SUBURBAN RANCH ZONE) TO THE TOWN'S R-144
(SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT) DESIGNATION FOR PARCEL
NUMBER 225-141-870
7. PUBLIC HEARING: OV9-03-23, TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA
COUNTY TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY EQUIVALENT FOR THE ANNEXED
AREA LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF NORTHERN AVENUE AND
4
September 2,2003 Approved P&Z Meeting Minutes
COOL DRIVE FROM PIMA COUNTY CB-2 (GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE) TO THE
TOWNS C-2 (COMMERCIAL DISTRICT) FOR PARCELS 225-141-790, 225-141-92B,
225-141-92C, 225-141-80A (PORTION) AND THE ANNEXED AREA LOCATED ONE
QUARTER MILE NORTH FROM THE INTERSECTION OF ORACLE ROAD AND
MAGEE ROAD ON THE WEST SIDE OF ORACLE ROAD FOR PARCEL NUMBER;
229-141-90A
8. PUBLIC HEARING: OV9-03-12, TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA
COUNTY TR (MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENCE) ZONE TO THE TOWN'S R-S
(RESIDENTIAL SERVICE) DISTRICT DESIGNATION FOR PARCEL NUMBER 225-
50-0040, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF MAGEE ROAD AND
NORTHERN AVENUE IN ANNEXATION AREA "B" AND DEVELOPED AS AN
OFFICE BUILDING.
9. PUBLIC HEARING: OV9-03-13, TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA
COUNTY SR (SUBURBAN RANCH) ZONE TO THE TOWN'S R1-144 (SINGLE-
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT DESIGNATION FOR 1,743 SQUARE FOOT
PARCEL (NO. 225-50-0070) OWNED BY THE CITY OF TUCSON AS A WELL SITE
AND LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF W. CHAPALA DRIVE AND
NORTHERN AVENUE.
10. PUBLIC HEARING: OV9-03-16, TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA
COUNTY TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY EQUIVALENT FOR THE ANNEXED
AREA, BOUNDED ON THE NORTH APPROXIMATELY 'A MILE SOUTH OF MAGEE
ROAD, ON THE EAST BY ORACLE ROAD, ON THE WEST BY THE TERMINUS OF
NORTHERN AVENUE AND ON THE SOUTH BY CATALINA VILLAGE:
TRANSLATION ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY TR (TRANSITIONAL ZONE) TO
THE TOWN'S R-S (RESIDENTIAL SERVICE DISTRICT) DESIGNATION FOR
PARCEL NUMBERS; 225-512-690 AND 225-512-700.
11. PUBLIC HEARING: OV9-03-09, TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA
COUNTY TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY EQUIVALENT FOR THE ANNEXED
AREA, BOUNDED ON THE WEST BY ORACLE ROAD, ON THE SOUTH BY
RIDGEVIEW PLAZA, ON THE NORTH BY DESERT WILLOWS SUBDIVISION AND
ON THE EAST BY RANCHO CATALINA, THE AREA IS ALSO KNOWN AS VERDE
CATALINA TOWNHOUSES, AND FURTHER THE AREA KNOWN AS CATALINA
CITRUS ESTATES (SISTERS OF THE IMMACULATE HEART), BOUNDED ON THE
WEST BY RIDGEVIEW PLAZA, ON THE SOUTH BY MAGEE ROAD, ON THE
NORTH BY RANCHO CATALINA AND ON THE EAST BY THE CORONADO
NATIONAL FOREST:
TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY SR (SUBURBAN RANCH) TO
THE TOWN'S R1-144 (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) DESIGNATION FOR
PARCEL NUMBERS; 225-142-400, 225-142-41A, 225-142-43A, 225-170-17B, 225-170-18B,
225-170-190, 225-141-91A, 225-130-10A, 225-170-25A, 225-170-26A, 225-170-280, 225-170-
290, 225-170-320, 225-130-11A, 225-170-330, 225-170-340, 225-170-350, 225-170-360, 225-
170-370, 225-170-380, 225-170-390, 225-130-120, 225-161-240, 225-161-250, 225-161-260,
5
September 2,2003 Approved P&Z Meeting Minutes
225-161-270, 225-161-280, 225-161-290, 225-161-300, 225-161-310, 225-161-320, 225-161-
330, 225-161-230, 225-161-500, 225-161-340, 225-161-220, 225-161-510, 225-161-490, 225-
161-350, 225-161-210, 225-161-520, 225-161-480, 225-161-360, 225-161-200, 225-161-530,
225-161-370, 225-161-540, 225-161-380, 225-161-550, 225-161-390, 225-161-190, 225-161-
560, 225-161-180, 225-161-470, 225-161-170, 225-161-570, 225-161-400, 225-161-460, 225-
161-160, 225-161-580, 225-161-410, 225-161-450, 225-161-150, 225-161-420, 225-161-590,
225-161-440, 225-161-140, 225-161-430, 225-161-630, 225-160-900, 225-161-070, 225-160-
910, 225-161-130, 225-161-120, 225-161-110, 225-161-100, 225-161-060, 225-161-090, 225-
161-080, 225-160-920, 225-161-050, 225-160-930, 225-161-040, 225-161-030, 225-160-940,
225-160-950, 225-160-960, 225-160-970, 225-160-980, 225-160-990, 225-161-000, 225-161-
010, 225-161-020, 225-161-620, 225-160-520, 225-160-530, 225-160-540, 225-160-550, 225-
160-560, 225-160-570, 225-160-580, 225-160-590, 225-160-600, 225-160-610, 225-160-500,
225-160-620, 225-160-500, 225-160-630, 225-160-810, 225-160-800, 225-160-790, 225-160-
780, 225-160-770, 225-160-760, 225-160-490, 225-160-640, 225-160-650, 225-160-480, 225-
160-820, 225-160-830, 225-160-840, 225-160-850, 225-160-660, 225-160-670, 225-160-470,
225-160-680, 225-160-460, 225-160-750, 225-160-860, 225-160-690, 225-160-450, 225-160-
740, 225-160-870, 225-160-700, 225-160-440, 225-160-730, 225-160-880, 225-160-710, 225-
160-430, 225-160-720, 225-160-890, 225-160-420, 225-160-410, 225-161-610, 225-160-330,
225-160-340, 225-160-320, 225-160-350, 225-160-150, 225-160-310, 225-160-400, 225-160-
390, 225-160-380, 225-160-370, 225-160-360, 225-160-160, 225-160-300, 225-160-170, 225-
160-180, 225-161-600, 225-160-190, 225-160-200, 225-160-210, 225-160-220, 225-160-230,
225-160-240, 225-160-250, 225-160-260, 225-160-270, 225-160-280, 225-160-290.
12. PUBLIC HEARING: OV9-03-17 TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA
COUNTY TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY EQUIVALENT FOR THE ANNEXED
AREA, BOUNDED ON THE WEST APPROXIMATELY 630 FEET EAST OF ORACLE
ROAD, ON THE SOUTH APPROXIMATELY 580 FEET NORTH OF MAGEE ROAD,
ON THE NORTH BY RANCHO CATALINA NORTH (SOUTH OF CATALINA
SHADOWS BOULEVARD) AND ON THE EAST BY THE CORONADO NATIONAL
FOREST, THE AREA IS ALSO KNOWN AS RANCHO CATALINA:
TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY CR-1 (SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCE ZONE) TO THE TOWN'S R1-36 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICT) DESIGNATION FOR PARCEL NUMBERS; 225-141-91A225-130-11A, 225-
130-10A, 225-170-280, 225-170-18B, 225-170-17B, 225-170-290, 225-170-190, 225-170-240,
225-170-340, 225-170-25A, 225-170-330, 225-170-230, 225-170-200, 225-170-350, 225-170-
26A, 225-170-390, 225-170-360, 225-170-380, 225-170-370, 225-170-220, 225-170-320, 225-
170-270, 225-170-400, 225-170-210, 225-170-160, 225-170-300, 225-170-310, 225-170-760,
225-170-150, 225-170-140, 225-170-460, 225-170-770, 225-170-130, 225-170-750, 225-170-
450, 225-170-470, 225-170-440, 225-170-430, 225-170-120, 225-170-420, 225-170-410, 225-
161-630, 225-170-780, 225-170-090, 225-170-740, 225-170-730, 225-170-720, 225-170-100,
225-170-480, 225-170-710, 225-170-700, 225-170-790, 225-170-850, 225-170-800, 225-170-
110, 225-170-490, 225-170-520, 225-170-500, 225-170-510, 225-170-840, 225-170-810, 225-
170-860, 225-170-510, 225-170-690, 225-170-680, 225-170-830, 225-170-080, 225-161-620,
225-170-670, 225-170-070, 225-170-820, 225-170-870, 225-170-650, 225-170-660, 225-170-
550, 225-170-540, 225-170,530, 225-170-560, 225-170-580, 225-170-880, 225-170-950, 225-
170-060, 225-170-890, 225-170-900, 225-170-640, 225-170-940, 225-170-590, 225-170-600,
225-172-210, 225-170-960, 225-170-930, 225-170-610, 225-172-160, 225-170-050, 225-170-
6
September 2,2003 Approved P&Z Meeting Minutes
920, 225-170-910, 225-170-630, 225-170-620, 225-172-170, 225-172-150, 225-172-180, 225-
171-060, 225-172-190, 225-172-200, 225-170-980, 225-170-970, 225-170-990, 225-171-000,
225-171-010, 225-170-040, 225-161-610, 225-171-020, 225-171-030, 225-172-140, 225-171-
040, 225-171-050, 225-172-130, 225-172-120, 225-172-090, 225-172-100, 225-172-110, 225-
172-22A.
13. PUBLIC HEARING: OV9-03-18, TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA
COUNTY TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY EQUIVALENT FOR THE ANNEXED
AREA, BOUNDED ON THE WEST BY ORACLE ROAD, ON THE NORTH BY VERDE
CATALINA TOWNHOUSES, ON THE EAST BY THE SISTERS OF THE
IMMACULATATE HEART AND ON THE SOUTH BY MAGEE ROAD, THE AREA IS
ALSO KNOWN AS RIDGEVIEW PLAZA:
TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY CB-1 (LOCAL BUSINESS ZONE)
TO THE TOWN'S C-2 (COMMERCIAL DISTRICT) DESIGNATION FOR THE
FOLLOWING PARCEL NUMBERS; 225-141-93D, 225-142-400, 225-141-93B, 225-142-
510, 225-142-41A, 225-142-520, 225-142-48A, 225-141-94A, 225-142-460, 225-142-43A, 225-
161-630, 225-170-17B.
14. PUBLIC HEARING: OV9-03-07, TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA
COUNTY CB-1 (LOCAL BUSINESS) DISTRICT TO THE TOWN'S C-2
(COMMERCIAL) DISTRICT DESIGNATION, WITH CONDITIONS, FOR PARCEL
NUMBERS 225-51-004A, 225-51-2170, 225-51-2180, 225-51-2140, 225-51-2160 AND 225-
51-2150, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF MAGEE ROAD AND
ORACLE ROAD IN ANNEXATION AREA "B" AND DEVELOPED AS THE "PLAZA
ESCONDIDA" SHOPPING CENTER.
15. PUBLIC HEARING: OV9-03-10, TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA
COUNTY TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY EQUIVALENT FOR THE ANNEXED
AREA, BOUNDED ON THE NORTH BY MAGEE ROAD, ON THE WEST
APPROXIMATELY 445-FEET EAST OF ORACLE ROAD, ON THE SOUTH BY
CATALINA VILLAGE AND WESTWARD LOOK GUEST RANCH AND ON THE
EAST BY COBO CATALINA HILLS, THE AREA IS ALSO KNOWN AS SUFFOLK
HILLS:
TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY CR-1 (SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCE ZONE) TO THE TOWN'S R1-36 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICT) DESIGNATION FOR PARCEL NUMBERS; 225-511-320, 225-512-080, 225-
510-280, 225-511-480, 225-511-200, 225-511-300, 225-510-210, 225-511-40A, 225-511-470,
225-511-41A, 225-510-220, 225-512-070, 225-511-890, 225-511-290, 225-510-230, 225-511-
42A, 225-510-290, 225-510-270, 225-510-260, 225-510-240, 225-510-250, 225-511-210, 225-
511-280, 225-511-43B, 225-511-900, 225-512-060, 225-511-220, 225-511-44A, 225-511-910,
225-511-230, 225-511-450, 225-511-460, 225-512-05A, 225-511-920, 225-510-300, 225-511-
240, 225-510-440, 225-511-930, 225-511-250, 225-512-04A, 225-510-430, 225-511-100, 225-
511-880, 225-511-270, 225-511-260, 225-511-940, 225-511-110, 225-510-420, 225-512-030,
225-510-410, 225-512-020, 225-512-010, 225-511-950, 225-512-000, 225-511-390, 225-510-
400, 225-510-390, 225-510-380, 225-510-370, 225-510-310, 225-511-090, 225-510-450, 225-
510-36B, 225-511-120, 225-511-960, 225-511-080, 225-511-130, 225-511-380, 225-510-460,
7
September 2,2003 Approved P&Z Meeting Minutes
225-510-36C, 225-511-970, 225-511-140, 225-511-150, 225-511-160, 225-511-170, 225-511-
180, 225-512-130, 225-512-120, 225-512-110, 225-511-980, 225-511-070, 225-511-33C, 225-
511-350, 225-512-100, 225-511-360, 225-510-470, 225-510-340, 225-510-330, 225-511-060,
225-511-370, 225-511-33D, 225-510-320, 225-510-480, 225-511-33E, 225-511-050, 225-512-
090, 225-511-040, 225-511-820, 225-510-490, 225-511-030, 225-511-020, 225-511-810,
225-511-830, 225-511-010, 225-511-000, 225-510-790, 225-511-840, 225-510-92A, 225-511-
850, 225-510-530, 225-511-630, 225-511-860, 225-510-640, 225-511-620, 225-510-540, 225-
510-91A, 225-510-890, 225-511-610, 225-510-980, 225-510-930, 225-510-52A, 225-510-550,
225-511-730, 225-511-650, 225-510-500, 225-511-600, 225-510-900, 225-510-51A, 225-510-
560, 225-511-800, 225-511-790, 225-511-780, 225-511-770, 225-511-760, 225-511-780, 225-
511-750, 225-511-770, 225-511-740, 225-511-760, 225-511-750,225-510-970, 225-510-880,
225-510-840, 225-510-570, 225-510-970, 225-511-590, 225-510-940, 225-510-850, 225-511-
720, 225-510-950, 225-510-870, 225-510-860, 225-511-67A, 225-510-960, 225-510-580, 225-
510-81A, 225-511-580, 225-510-590, 225-511-710, 225-510-81B, 225-510-820, 225-510-740,
225-510-830, 225-511-570, 225-510-750, 225-510-600, 225-511-700, 225-510-730, 225-511-
690, 225-511-560, 225-510-610, 225-511-680, 225-511-55B, 225-510-720, 225-510-760, 225-
510-620, 225-510-800, 225-510-790, 225-510-780, 225-510-770, 225-510-630, 225-510-640,
225-510-650, 225-510-660, 225-510-670, 225-510-680, 225-510-690, 225-510-700, 225-510-
710, 225-500-010, 225-511-490, 225-511-500, 225-511-510, 225-511-520, 225-511-530, 225-
511-540, 225-511-55A, 225-511-190, 225-511-310.
16. PUBLIC HEARING: OV9-03-19, TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA
COUNTY TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY EQUIVALENT FOR THE ANNEXED
AREA, BOUNDED ON THE NORTH BY MAGEE ROAD AND ON THE WEST, SOUTH
AND EAST BY SUFFOLK HILLS, THE AREA IS ALSO KNOWN AS THE
IMMACULATE HEART SCHOOL:
TRANSLATION ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY SR (SUBURAN RANCH) TO THE
TOWN'S R1-144 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT) DESIGNATION FOR
PARCEL NUMBER: 225-500-010.
17. PUBLIC HEARING: OV9-03-06, TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA
COUNTY TR (TRANSITIONAL) ZONE TO THE TOWN'S R-S (RESIDENTIAL
SERVICE) DISTRICT DESIGNATION FOR PARCEL NUMBER 225-51-0190; AND
FROM PIMA COUNTY TR (TRANSITIONAL) ZONE TO THE TOWN'S R-S
(RESIDENTIAL SERVICE) DISTRICT DESIGNATION WITH A CONDITION FOR
PARCEL NUMBERS 225-51-011A, 225-51-018A AND 225-51-0200, ALL LOCATED ON
THE EAST SIDE OF ORACLE ROAD BETWEEN MAGEE ROAD AND SUFFOLK
DRIVE.
18. PUBLIC HEARING: OV9-03-15, TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA
COUNTY TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY EQUIVALENT FOR THE ANNEXED
AREA, BOUNDED ON THE WEST BY ORACLE ROAD, ON NORTH
APPROXIMATELY 1,115-FEET SOUTH OF MAGEE ROAD, ON THE EAST BY
SUFFOLK HILLS AND ON THE SOUTH APPROXIMATELY 1,075-FEET NORTH OF
SUFFOLK HILLS DRIVE:
8
September 2,2003 Approved P&Z Meeting Minutes
TRANSLATION ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY SR (SUBURBAN RANCH) TO THE
TOWN'S R1-144 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT) DESIGNATION FOR
PARCEL NUMBER; 225-510-12A.
19. PUBLIC HEARING: OV9-03-20, TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA
COUNTY TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY EQUIVALENT FOR THE ANNEXED
AREA, BOUNDED ON THE WEST BY ORACLE ROAD, ON THE NORTH
APPROXIMATELY 1,274-FEET SOUTH OF MAGEE ROAD, ON THE EAST BY
SUFFOLK HILLS AND ON THE SOUTH APPROXIMATELY 503-FEET NORTH OF
SUFFOLK HILLS DRIVE:
TRANSLATIONAL ZONING FROM PIMA COUNTY TR(TRANSITIONAL ZONE) TO
THE TOWN'S R-S (RESIDENTIAL SERVICE DISTRICT) DESIGNATION FOR
PARCEL NUMBERS; 225-510-130, 225-510-140, 225-510-150, 225-510-160, 225-510-17B
AND 225-510-17A.
Acting Chair Cox opened up discussion and questions from the Commissioners:
Item #5, the development plan approved by Pima County will be honored by the Town,
as well as any unfinished portions. It is functionally equivalent to a pre-annexation
agreement. It would be good to add the condition that all development plans in place be
honored.
Item #15, OV9-03-10, Exhibit 4, last page indicates that translation is from Pima County
CR-1 to Oro Valley, R1-144 whereas the text in the recommendation reflects R1-36.
The correct zoning is R1-36.
PUBLIC HEARING FOR ALL TRANSLATIONAL ZONINGS OPENED AT 6:40 P.M.
Bill Adler, 10720 N. Eagle Eye asked to speak on Agenda item #3 and #5. He does not
look as translational zonings as routine, so he objects to the procedure. He sees
translational zoning as an opportunity to place zoning on property that reflects what we
would like it to be rather than what it is. We can allow existing development to continue
and no interference in development rights or pre-annexation agreements. If there were
major changes or redevelopment in the area, then we should have zoning in place that
we would like to have rather than the equivalent of what is in existence now. For
example, item #3, he objects to the 34 foot building height, and if this area is ever
redeveloped it should comply with Oro Valley zoning code. This should be stipulated.
On item #5, he feels that it would be better to rezone to CN rather than C-1 because it is
adjacent to residential areas. He is not suggesting mandating changes on existing
zoning. The zoning we put into place creates a legal, non-conforming situation. Oro
Valley has restrictive ordinance by reputation because we want a desirable appearance.
John James, 661 Mountain Sunrise Place, withdrew from speaking as Mr. Vella
answered his questions regarding horse property.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 6:45 P.M.
9
September 2,2003 Approved P&Z Meeting Minutes
Acting Chair Cox opened up discussion and questions for Staff.
There is no time period that the Town would have to wait to begin applying zoning
classifications to the land to more closely represent how the land is used. Any change
in zoning would have to follow the Town's normal rezoning procedure which would
commence at any time and includes instigation by the Town itself.
Change of ownership does not change any of the zoning requirements. It is attached to
the land and stays with it no matter who owns the land.
The translational zoning cannot increase intensity or uses, nor can the zoning be
reduced. Zoning classification must be adopted that allow the property owner to retain
their existing rights.
Following are the motions on the forgoing Staff Reports:
#3. MOTION: Commissioner Kinared MOVED to recommend that Town Council
approve OV9-03-21, translating the zoning from Pima County CR-4 (Multiple Dwelling
Type Zone) to Oro Valley R-4 (Townhouse Residential) for the proposed parcels, with a
condition that the County CR-4 building height be maintained by the Town.
Commissioner Krenkowitz seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-0.
#4. MOTION: Commissioner Manross MOVED to recommend that Town Council
approve OV9-03-08, translating zoning from Pima County TR(Transitional Zone) to Oro
Valley R-S (Residential Service District) for the proposed parcels. Commissioner Anning
seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-0.
#5. MOTION: Commissioner Krenkowitz MOVED to recommend that the Town
Council approve OV9-03-14, translating zoning from Pima County CB-1 (Local Business
Zone) to the Oro Valley C-2 (Commercial District) for the proposed parcels, with the
condition that the owner of the property commonly known as Plaza De Vida shall
continue to have the development rights now accorded to that owner under the approved
Development Plan recorded in Book 56, at page 99. Commissioner Manross seconded
the motion. Motion carried 5-0.
#6. MOTION: Commissioner Krenkowitz moved to recommend that the Town Council
approve OV9-03-22, translating the zoning from Pima County SR (Suburban Ranch) to
Oro Valley R1-144 (Single Family Residential) with the condition that the horse and other
farm animal rights granted by the Town Council in Resolution 02-68 on August 1, 2002, be
attached to the zoning. Commissioner Anning seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-0.
#7. MOTION: Commissioner Krenkowitz MOVED to recommend that Town Council
approve OV9-03-23, translating zoning from Pima County CB-2 (General Business Zone)
to the Oro Valley C-2 (Commercial District) for the proposed parcels. Commissioner
Manross seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-0.
10
September 2,2003 Approved P&Z Meeting Minutes
#8. MOTION: Commissioner Manross MOVED to recommend approval of OV9-03-12,
translating zoning of Parcel No. 225-50-0040 to the Town of Oro Valley R-S (Residential
Service) District. Commissioner Krenkowitz seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-0.
#9. MOTION: Commissioner Anning MOVED to recommend approval of OV9-03-13,
translating zoning of Parcel No. 225-50-0070 to the Town of Oro Valley R1-144 (Single
Family Residential) District. Commissioner Krenkowitz seconded the motion. Motion
carried 5-0.
#10. MOTION: Commissioner Manross MOVED to recommend that the Town Council
approve OV9-03-16, translating the zoning from Pima County Transitional Zone to Oro
Valley Residential Service District. Commissioner Anning seconded the motion. Motion
carried 5-0.
#11. MOTION: Commissioner Krenkowitz MOVED to recommend that the Town Council
approve OV9-03-09, translating zoning for the Verde Catalina Townhouses and the Sisters
of the Immaculate Heart properties, from Pima County SR to Oro Valley R1-144, with the
condition that horse and other farm animal rights permitted under the Pima County
designation of Suburban Ranch will be recognized in accordance with the Resolution of the
Town Council No. 02-68 adopted on August 1, 2002. Commissioner Manross seconded the
motion. Motion carried 5-0.
#12. MOTION: Commissioner Krenkowitz MOVED to recommend that the Town Council
approve OV9-03-17, translating the zoning for Rancho Catalina from Pima County CR-1
to Oro Valley R1-36, subject to the two conditions set forth in Exhibit A to OV9-03-17.
Commissioner Manross seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-0.
#13. MOTION: Commissioner Manross MOVED to recommend that the Town Council
approve OV9-03-18, translating the zoning for Ridgeview Plaza from Pima County CB-1 to
Oro Valley C-2. Commissioner Anning seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-0.
#14. MOTION: Commissioner Krenkowitz MOVED to recommend approval of OV9-03-
07,translating zoning of Parcel Nos. 225-51-004A, 225-51-2170, 225-51-2180, 225-51-2140,
225-51-2160, and 225-51-2150 from Pima County zoning CB-1 to the Town of Oro Valley
C-2 (Commercial) District. Commissioner Anning seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-
0.
#15. MOTION: Commissioner Krenkowitz MOVED to recommend that the Town Council
approve OV9-03-10, translating zoning for Suffolk Hills, from Pima County CR-1 to Oro
Valley R1-36, subject to the two conditions set forth in Exhibit A to OV9-03-10.
Commissioner Kinared seconded the motion. Discussion: Commissioner Anning mentioned
noting that Exhibit 4 needs to be corrected to read R1-36 instead of R1-144. Motion carried 5-
0.
#16. MOTION: Commissioner Manross MOVED to recommend that the Town Council
approve OV9-03-19, translating zoning for the Immaculate Heart School from Pima
County SR to Oro Valley R1-144, subject to the condition listed in Exhibit A, attached
herewith. Commissioner Krenkowitz seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-0.
11
September 2, 2003 Approved P&Z Meeting Minutes
#17. MOTION: Commissioner Krenkowitz MOVED to recommend approval of OV9-03-
06, translating zoning of Parcel Nos. 225-51-0190, 225-51-011A, 225-51-018A and 225-51-
0200 to the Town of Oro Valley zoning R-S (Residential Service) District, with the two
conditions set forth in Exhibit A to OV9-03-06. Commissioner Anning seconded the
motion. Motion carried 5-0.
#18. MOTION: Commissioner Anning MOVED to recommend that the Town Council
approve OV9-03-15, translating the zoning from Pima County Suburban Ranch to Oro
Valley R1-144, subject to the one condition set forth in Exhibit A to OV9-03-15.
Commissioner Manross seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-0.
#19. MOTION: Commissioner Manross MOVED to recommend that the Town Council
approve OV9-03-20, translating the zoning from Pima County Transitional Zone to Oro
Valley Residential Service District. Commissioner Kinared seconded the motion. Motion
carried 5-0.
Commissioner Kinared would like to have Staff look into and report on Bill Adler's Call to
the Audience comments regarding the conflict between the General Plan and Zoning
Code Mixed Use designation and present at the next meeting.
Commissioner Krenkowitz suggested that prior to Staff researching the above, that they
consider if there is any conflict that requires resolution.
Commissioner Krenkowitz would also like for Staff to report at the next meeting on what
is happening with Cricket Communication. Has anything been done? What can be
done? How does their bankruptcy affect the Town's ability to alleviate the violation?
ADJOURN REGULAR SESSION
MOTION: Commissioner Kinared MOVED to adjourn. Commissioner Krenkowitz
seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-0. Meeting adjourned at 7:25 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Diane Chapman, Recording Secretary
12
Pv.LEY q, / TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
Q° I I II I I
2� GOLDER RANCH FIRE DISTRICT
i 111111 , COMMUNITY RISK PREVENTION
AA
2000 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE _ 1
'UNDER 7
4
TO: Town of Oro Valley Planning and Zoning Division
FROM: Steven Schoon, Fire Marshal
DATE: January 9, 2004
PROJECT: RV N-10 P-S,U,V OV1203-30
PLAN REVIEW: Fire Code Review for the Preliminary Plat or Development Plan
Please include the following Fire Code review comments to the applicant for the above referenced project.
1. Please add the following to the General Notes:
a. The minimum fire flow and flow duration requirements for one-and two-family dwellings
having a fire area which does not exceed 3,600 square feet(344.5 m2) shall be 1,000
gallons per minute (3785.4 L/min.). Fire flow and flow duration for dwellings having a fire
area in excess of 3,600 square feet(344.5 m2) shall not be less than that specified in
Table B105.1. EXCEPTION: A reduction in required fire flow of 50 percent, as approved,
is allowed when the building is provided with an approved automatic sprinkler system in
accordance with Chapter 9 of the International Fire Code.
b. Water supply for fire protection (fire flow) is required to be installed and made serviceable
prior to combustible materials arriving on the site.
The following comments are for documentation purposes and are not provided as a change or modification to
the plans.
1. Fire apparatus access roads and water supply for fire protection is required to be installed and
made serviceable prior to combustible materials arriving on the site.
2. Temporary street signs shall be installed at each street intersection when construction of new
roadways allows passage of vehicles. All structures under construction shall be clearly identified
with an approved address and building number. Signs shall be of an approved size,weather
resistant, and be maintained until replaced by permanent signs.
3. The minimum fire flow and flow duration requirements for one-and two-family dwellings having a
fire area which does not exceed 3,600 square feet(344.5 m2) shall be 1,000 gallons per minute
(3785.4 L/min.). Fire flow and flow duration for dwellings having a fire area in excess of 3,600
square feet(344.5 m2)shall not be less than that specified in Table B105.1. EXCEPTION: A
reduction in required fire flow of 50 percent, as approved, is allowed when the building is provided
with an approved automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Chapter 9 of the International Fire
Code.
4. All out of service hydrants shall be clearly marked or tagged as out of service.While the water lines
are undergoing bacteriological cleansing and testing, the hydrants shall be marked as out of
service. Out of service marking and tags shall remain until the hydrant has been inspected by the
developer, approved by the Water Utility, and is in service. The Water Utility will notify the Fire
Marshal when the hydrants are in service and available for fire flow testing.
5. The Developer is responsible for blue reflective street markers at each hydrant location.
6. Structures under construction, alteration, or demolition shall be provided with not less than one
approved portable fire extinguisher. Fire extinguishers shall be conspicuously located where they
will be readily accessible and immediately available in the event of fire. Portable fire extinguishers
shall be maintained in a fully charged and operable condition. The code official is authorized to
require additional approved portable fire extinguishers where special hazards exist, such as
flammable or combustible liquid storage hazards. Fire extinguishers shall comply with IFC Section
906.
Golder Ranch Fire District - Community Risk Prevention 3535 E. Hawser St.; Tucson,Arizona 85739
www.golderranchfire.org prevention(u`golderranchfire.org 520-818-1017 520-825-9001 Fax 520-825-8043
b
7. Fire extinguishers for roofing operations shall be readily available. There shall be at least one
multipurpose portable fire extinguisher with a rating of 2-A:20-B:C on the roof being covered or
repaired.
8. Deferred fire protection system plans shall be submitted and approved prior to installation of the
system. Failure to gain approved plans prior to installation will be subject to citation.
Please call me at 818-1017 if I can be of assistance,
Steven Schoon, Fire Marshal
Golder Ranch Fire District - Community Risk Prevention 3535 E.Hawser St.; Tucson,Arizona 85739
www.eoldcrranchfire.org prevention(a>golderranchfire.org 520-818-1017 520-825-9001 Fax 520-825-8043
•
\p+,LEY qq,. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
aQ° GOLDER RANCH FIRE DISTRICT LDeR
i COMMUNITY RISK PREVENTION WAR& E
j, • �' 2000 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE
ov ''
TO: Town of Oro Valley Planning and Zoning Division
FROM: Steven Schoon, Fire Marshal
DATE: January 9, 2004
PROJECT: RV N-3 Phase II Lots 13-70, OV1203-36
PLAN REVIEW: Fire Code Review for the Preliminary Plat or Development Plan
Please include the following Fire Code review comments to the applicant for the above referenced project.
1. General Note#15 indicates a fire flow of 1000 GPM. For commercial developments, the minimum
fire flow required is 1,500 GPM. This is only a minimum, and fire flow is determined by the square
footage of fire area and the IBC construction type for each individual building. Limiting the fire flow
to 1,500 may result in limiting the size of the buildings that can be constructed on each lot. The
area of 1901 Innovation Park Drive is capable of delivering at least 2,000 GPM. I encourage you
to consult with the Oro Valley Water Utility to possibly establish a fire flow availability that exceeds
1,500 GPM for the Commercial Park Industrial and Commercial occupancies that may choose to
establish occupancy at these locations.
2. Please add the following to the General Notes:
a. "Water supply for fire protection (fire flow) is required to be installed and made serviceable
prior to combustible materials arriving on the site."
3. ACCESS—Street G, which serves as fire apparatus access for lots 13 through 37, has a single
point of access with a cul-de-sac on the north end. IFC Appendix D104 requires there be two
separate and approved points of access for buildings or facilities exceeding 62,000 square feet in
fire area. The exception increases the square footage to 124,000 when an approved automatic
sprinkler system is installed. I recommend considering Street G to continue to another access
road such as Innovation Park Drive or Rancho Vistoso BLVD so as to avoid limiting the maximum
size of Commercial Park Industrial and Commercial occupancies that may choose to establish
occupancy at these locations.
The following general fire code comments are for documentation purposes and are not provided as a change or
modification to the plans.
1. Fire apparatus access roads and water supply for fire protection is required to be installed and
made serviceable prior to combustible materials arriving on the site.
2. Temporary street signs shall be installed at each street intersection when construction of new
roadways allows passage of vehicles. All structures under construction shall be clearly identified
with an approved address and building number. Signs shall be of an approved size, weather
resistant, and be maintained until replaced by permanent signs.
3. The minimum fire flow and flow duration requirements for one-and two-family dwellings having a
fire area which does not exceed 3,600 square feet(344.5 m2) shall be 1,000 gallons per minute
(3785.4 L/min.). Fire flow and flow duration for dwellings having a fire area in excess of 3,600
square feet(344.5 m2) shall not be less than that specified in Table B105.1. EXCEPTION: A
reduction in required fire flow of 50 percent, as approved, is allowed when the building is provided
with an approved automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Chapter 9 of the International Fire
Code.
4. All out of service hydrants shall be clearly marked or tagged as out of service. While the water lines
are undergoing bacteriological cleansing and testing, the hydrants shall be marked as out of
service. Out of service marking and tags shall remain until the hydrant has been inspected by the
developer, approved by the Water Utility, and is in service. The Water Utility will notify the Fire
Marshal when the hydrants are in service and available for fire flow testing.
Golder Ranch Fire District - Community Risk Prevention 3535 E. Hawser St.; Tucson,Arizona 85739
www.<eolderrauchfire.org prevention(a?..goldcrranchfire.org 520-818-1017 520-825-9001 Fax 520-825-8043
5. The Developer is responsible for blue reflective street markers at each hydrant location.
6. Structures under construction, alteration, or demolition shall be provided with not less than one
approved portable fire extinguisher. Fire extinguishers shall be conspicuously located where they
will be readily accessible and immediately available in the event of fire. Portable fire extinguishers
shall be maintained in a fully charged and operable condition. The code official is authorized to
require additional approved portable fire extinguishers where special hazards exist, such as
flammable or combustible liquid storage hazards. Fire extinguishers shall comply with IFC Section
906.
7. Fire extinguishers for roofing operations shall be readily available. There shall be at least one
multipurpose portable fire extinguisher with a rating of 2-A:20-B:C on the roof being covered or
repaired.
8. Deferred fire protection system plans shall be submitted and approved prior to installation of the
system. Failure to gain approved plans prior to installation will be subject to citation.
Please call me at 818-1017 if I can be of assistance,
Steven Schoon, Fire Marshal
Golder Ranch Fire District - Community Risk Prevention 3535 E.Hawser St.; Tucson,Arizona 85739
www.goldcrranchfire.org prevent:ion(a),golderranchfire.org 520-818-1017 520-825-9001 Fax 520-825-8043