HomeMy WebLinkAboutOV90327 04/01/2003 10:22 52074210`v) PAGE 02/02
• COO? £ 0 130
c
�UNDED\t
Planning end Zoning Divi,ion
11000 N.La Canada Drive,Oro VAllcy A7,85737
Phone:(520)229-4800 Fna:(520)742-1022
Web Site Address: www,lownofprOVNlcy.enm
REQUEST FOR PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE
AMENDMENTS AND REZONINGS
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: KQ`2.ov1 r vi O 3g1. °Cce a r -40141
" A '?‘AA-a... Ittei - Li id
_sAA -p 0 CHo tc
LOCATION: N ( CQf ne., 0 �. c Ct� a x pp
GLGL a VL -Tay % 1t e__
PARCEL NUMBER: Z 1 ... 7_ 0170 0 N 0 OU 0 00001 00_!.4I tiCA 0O I C
TYPE OF REQUEST: *-Z 0 ✓l
APPLICANT NAME/FIRM: I le,v VO Le\16.K ?kyvA ti 1 e5o c
ADDRESS:. . 70 N , (t1uccfr P'ie a
TELEPHONE NO,: &Z 11 1S FAX NO.: a-g%3`EMAIL: v"ev( I yucK E ,
PROPERTY OWNER: OS t e , Pt& �- '� `'� ��St �CeS. ✓L�-
PREAPPLICATION NFERENCE pATETTIME REQUESTED: 1 (7 Z 00 3 APt
SIGNATURE: DATE: 10/ g lQ 3
1
o SUBMITTALS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AT LEAST TEN (10)
WORKING DAYS IN ADVANCE OF THE DESIRED PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE DATE.
SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS "ALL PLANS MUST BE FOLDED PER PIMA COUNTY FOLD."
o TWENTY EIGHT (28) COPIES (24X36) OF THE TENTATIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN, WITH
LOCATION MAP,
F:IAdmin PZIFORMSAmendments&Rezonings HandoutIPREAPP,FRM.doc
t
. -11IK
28 27 ��; :�_� 27 26
1 I33 ���■■■I■ 35
-._--� FIRE ■STATION I ■■■■ ■ ��> cn ■CA ■1■ ■1�I Z PITY IIL1!
r-. [_
•_ _____1(5)
C/\��jJ ,
- ,,— — -•
, — RO CT
i
ni1:
z „,, 0 ''#,•., tsA_....,, f,, Z IP ice,
---- m •,, �i �/ %, K1-72 3.0 AC • • A
1.7 AC 33 34 1I1I35
ZWAS <' 1.S AC 1.7 AC
� •
' "'��ii �,,/•�iiiii I 1 7 AC I I (S) 4 3 3 2
���' ' ' e4 4Yt# I TOWNSHIP 11 S, RANGE
rrt �' �, '�,ii/Y�� �/ ♦: ' /�� i�ii —{ SECTION 34,
m I I •, �� ����� tit, �` i�`ii 7/_ 13 E; PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA
73- z 2.3 AC I �/� �� U ( 1 LOCATION MAP
1 0* •,. _N.)
fig Q
O c„ I Idi1P4r I, �� NTS
. c� fFPiic,;,,#,:.,jp##:Sd>1 D
/(ar ' t / IN
2.8 AC - 2.3 A 11.0AC 4• �i kit Zevii4z/zAarlde
Mr
ram r� i6 i : '�!
2.9 ACL�. i 2.4 AC 1• 2.4 AC .-- �`„
, 4, ecrreeation� 25 5pace5`�. , I A T1r‘ , ..,, „., ,,...
+��---
TF'10,000 of•
... '‘ , .,,,,:.1 ------- _0 * 0
S 3.7 •C ) * 0 I I \
LA CANAEA SOAP ORO VALLEY TOWN LIMITS
�. OCT 0 3 2003
,/
''0 • • ,..r.
................,
--N, \
72,
OPTION A
LEGEND
GENERAL NOTES:
PEDESTRIAN ACCESS
A. GROSS AREA OF PROPERTY TO BE REZONED: 38.8 ADDITIONAL NOTES:
B. ZONING REQUEST FROM RI-I44 AND SR(PIMA I. STREET LAYOUT SHALL BE PER TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PROPOSED ZONING: RI-7 — — BUFFERYARD SETBACK LINE PARCELS 219-47-0170
COUNTY) TO RI-72 (12.75 ACRES)AND TP(26.05 ACRES) STANDARDS WITH 45'ROW. ...— FUTURE ROW
C. GROSS FLOOR AREA:25% 2. ALL SAGUAROS SHALL BE PRESERVED IN PLACE,OR IF A NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLAN WILL BE — — — T.O.V.DRAINAGE EASEMENT 0180, 0050, 00 60,
D. FLOOR AREA RATIO:25% NECESSARY FOR ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION, HOUSE SUBMITTED AT THE TIME OF PRELIMINARY PLAT(PER TELEPHONE EASEMENT
E. BUILDING VOLUME RATIO:? PLACEMENT (ONLY WHEN NO ALTERNATIVE EXISTS)ON LOTS, ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE ARTICLE 14-101). e 0 ELECTRIC EASEMENT 004A, 004B, 004c
F. RESIDENTIAL DENSITY: ?RAC. SALVAGED AND RE-PLANTED ONSITE. DRAINAGE
G. NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL LOTS: 5 3. ONLY NATIVE PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE USED FOR THE THE TANGERINE OVERLAY DISTRICT(ORO VALLEY PROPERTY LINE ON
H. BUILDING HEIGHTS: 1-2 STORIES-<25' PURPOSES OF SITE RE-VEGETATION. ZONING CODE ARTICLE 10-0)APPLIES TO THIS — • —. . - 404JURISDICTION BOUNDARY TANGERINE ROAD AND
1. PARKING REQD.: ? PARKING PROVIDED: ? 4. WROUGHT IRON OR SOME (OTHER)APPROPRIATE FENCING PROJECT. EXISTING NATIVE VEGETATION IN THE EXISTING SEWER _
J-K CONSERVATION EASEMENT: 5.00 ACRES SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG THE FIFTEEN FOOT RIPARIAN REQUIRED 50' NO ACCESS EASEMENT SHALL BE - — EXISTING Gas LINE ' LA CA NADA ROAD
DETENTION: ?ACRES APRON, EXCEPT WHERE WASH ACCESS IS PROVIDED. PRESERVED IN PLACE.
NO ACCESS EASEMENT: ?ACRES 5. DETENTION BASINS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO DRAIN DRY EXISTING ELECTRIC LINE REZONING FROM
THE RIPARIAN HABITAT PROTECTION OVERLAY — EXISTING WATER LINE
BUFFERYARDS: ?ACRES AND TO BE USED AS RECREATION AREAS. - 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN BOUNDA
PARKS REQD.: ?ACRES PARKS PROVIDED:?ACRES 6. CONSTRUCTION ON LOTS MARKED WITH AN ASTERISK DISTRICT (ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE ARTICLE 10-7) FLOW ARROW R I-144 AND SR (P.C.)
GENERAL OPEN SPACE:?ACRES SYMBOL SHALL BE LIMITED TO SINGLE STORY AND 18 FEET. APPLIES TO THIS PROJECT. A FIFTEEN FOOT 1 TRAFFIC CIRCULATION DIRECT
TOTAL OPEN SPACE PROVIDED: ?ACRES OR? % IF HOUSES ARE SITED ON THEIR SIDE, THE SET BACK SHALL SETBACK SHALL BE PRESERVED ALONG THE HABITAT TO RI-72 AND TP
maw
L. FLOODPLAINS ARE NOT TO BE ALTERED OR FILLED BE 20-FEET. CORRIDOR AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. WITHIN THIS O.S.-OPEN SPACE
UNLESS APPROVED BY TOWN ENGINEER. 7. 50% OF THE LOTS ALONG LA CA NADA ROAD SHALL BE S AREA ALL EXISTING NATIVE VEGETATION SHALL BE Q'Tl'Zl,CC f 15'RIPARIAN SETBACK SCALE: I 1=100'-0"
M. WATER SERVICE PROVIDER:ORO VALLEY WATER INGLE STORY AND 18 FEET. PRESERVED.
8. THERE WILL BE NO ENCROACHMENT IN THE 100-YEAR SINGLE STORY ONLY CONTOUR INTERVAL: I FOOT
FLOODPLAIN UNLESS APPROVED BY TOWN ENGINEER.
9. A HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION SHALL BE FORMED FOR
THE SUBDIVISION, WHICH SHALL BE CHARGED WITH ■
IN SCALE: 111=200'-0" PRESERVATION OF THE PROTECTED RIPARIAN HABITAT IN AN UNDISTURBED STATE. ■ planning resources
mu j 0 200' 4 planning landscape architecture urban desior Qevelooment consultant%
270 North Church Avenue,Tucson Arizona 85701 . (520)628-1118 fax 628-7637
r 2111 East Broadway,Ste.14,Tempe Arizona 85282 • (602)921-0208 fax:921-9561
OCTOBER 2,2003 IV 02020.01
\/•PI ANNINC PFC(11 iur rc rn ccoon icrrc knwn,n nu m,...r..,......., .....__.,_ .....,..r...,-ter,,..,r,,,.._ _
i
• r 1.
i 28 27 ;�� 27 26
1 33 _, 35
STATION ��
>11
v
ZI MIA,
f 1MA COUNTY �, miiij!
, i
VV J C�
/ __ _ ama _ .i1
�''�"'� off ---- , ------ I ��r
i 1. il
—
mI A E 0 z guiiiu"
I , f�1-72 3.0ACa.uI 33 t 35
Z 7 'A,_ r �' •"� WAS 1.7AC 1 1.71C I 1.8AC I 1.7AC +� 4 3 �� 3 2
�/ ��4�,�,tr �• ° ,avt:#sYssi,4s —k SECTION 34, TG ISI 11 S. RANGE
_ Irk � ., ••zei,,3; ��!� 0,� :• .��� ''�'� �•" , Q, 13 E; PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA
R1-72
�� RETAIL ��� {� ,,-� '•! / • • I I / LOCATION MAP
I ' ��
l z— (• 15,000 of �% • �r s ' •1/ Imo, i�) :ezi Q
�� i> -__, RETAIL , ��ss�i,s ril if �� ass s �/
H • , NTS /N
RETAIL �� ►� ��/ f VW
25,000 of �/ ►� •f' 1
30,000 5f �� 2,3 AC 12.0 AC M. * " Ar•:e.toer, 0 0•
4-.._ 1044 9.1 AC i tk. 0. 0 0 wow.. .
L eib --"'"`�'� ecreation\r‘ i �/ �� ��� ( 2.9 AC
�. il•/ I ,� ,� Are ; 25 5pacee 1
C-NI 18,000 5f 1.7 C il
?"-- - lii, ei i�'i �r 4• ' •: �% fri 10,000 of -'N
• 0 1 i
......,,,,......NN„:„...10 I I
\
_� _ o 7:zr — —
'�� - - -
:' ".. .
� - CANADA
Of�OVALLEYTOWNLIM[T5
LA ROACH
--- - '
*.-.N
,-//rz/'''V''''V/7 I
-
_ .-----
- II
OPTION B
LEGEND
GENERAL NOTES: PEDESTRIAN ACCESS
A, GROSS AREA OF PROPERTY TO BE REZONED: 38.8 ACRES ADDITIONAL NOTES: BUFFERYARD SETBACK LINE
B. ZONING REQUEST FROM RI-144 AND SR(PIMA I. STREET LAYOUT SHALL BE PER TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PROPOSED ZONING: RI-7 PARCELS 219-47-0170,
STANDARDS WITH 45'ROW. -- FUTURE ROW
COUNTY) TO RI-72 (12.75 ACRES)AND C-N(26.05 ACRES) A NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLAN WILL BET.O.V.DRAINAGE EASEMENT
C. GROSS FLOOR AREA: 25% 2. ALL SAGUAROS SHALL BE PRESERVED IN PLACE, OR IF — — — 0180, 0050, 0060,
D. FLOOR AREA RATIO: 25% NECESSARY FOR ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION, HOUSE SUBMITTED AT THE TIME OF PRELIMINARY PLAT(PER - • - - - TELEPHONE EASEMENT
E. BUILDING VOLUME RATIO: ? PLACEMENT (ONLY WHEN NO ALTERNATIVE EXISTS)ON LOTS, ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE ARTICLE 14-101). 0 0 ELECTRIC EASEMENT 004A, 004B, 004c
F. RESIDENTIAL DENSITY: ?RAC. SALVAGED AND RE-PLANTED ONSITE. _-___...__. DRAINAGE ON
G. NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL LOTS: 5 3. ONLY NATIVE PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE USED FOR THE THE TANGERINE OVERLAY DISTRICT (ORO VALLEY PROPERTY LINE
H. BUILDING HEIGHTS: 1-2 STORIES-<25' PURPOSES OF SITE RE-VEGETATION. ZONING CODE ARTICLE 10-0)APPLIES TO THIS — . — • — 404 JURISDICTION BOUNDARY TANGERINE ROAD AND
I. PARKING REQD.: ? PARKING PROVIDED: ? 4. WROUGHT IRON OR SOME (OTHER)APPROPRIATE FENCING PROJECT. EXISTING NATIVE VEGETATION IN THE EXISTING SEWER
J-K CONSERVATION EASEMENT: 5.00 ACRES SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG THE FIFTEEN FOOT RIPARIAN REQUIRED 50' NO ACCESS EASEMENT SHALL BE —..—., EXISTING Gas LINE LA CARJADA ROAD
DETENTION: ?ACRES APRON, EXCEPT WHERE WASH ACCESS IS PROVIDED. PRESERVED IN PLACE. EXISTING ELECTRIC LINE
NO ACCESS EASEMENT: ?ACRES 5. DETENTION BASINS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO DRAIN DRY --------- EXISTING WATER LINE REZONING FROM
BUFFERYARDS: ?ACRES AND TO BE USED AS RECREATION AREAS. THE RIPARIAN HABITAT PROTECTION OVERLAY __.__._. 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN BOUNDA
PARKS REQD.: ? ACRES PARKS PROVIDED:?ACRES 6. CONSTRUCTION ON LOTS MARKED WITH AN ASTERISK DISTRICT (ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE ARTICLE 10-7) FLOW ARROW R I-144 AND SR (P.C.)
GENERAL OPEN SPACE:?ACRES SYMBOL SHALL BE LIMITED TO SINGLE STORY AND 18 FEET. APPLIES TO THIS PROJECT. A FIFTEEN FOOT tTRAFFIC CIRCULATION DIRECT
TOTAL OPEN SPACE PROVIDED: ?ACRES OR ? % IF HOUSES ARE SITED ON THEIR SIDE, THE SET BACK SHALL SETBACK SHALL BE PRESERVED ALONG THE HABITAT MAWR TO R 1-72 AND C-N
CORRIDOR AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. WITHIN THIS O.S.-OPEN SPACE
L. FLOODPLAINS ARE NOT TO BE ALTERED OR FILLED BE 20-FEET. SCALE: I�=IOO�-OI�
UNLESS APPROVED BY TOWN ENGINEER. 7. 50% OF THE LOTS ALONG LA CA N ®ADA ROAD SHALL BE S AREA ALL EXISTING NATIVE VEGETATION SHALL BE 15'RIPARIAN SETBACK
M. WATER SERVICE PROVIDER: ORO VALLEY WATER INGLE STORY AND 18 FEET. PRESERVED. * SINGLE STORY ONLY CONTOUR INTERVAL: I FOOT
8. THERE WILL BE NO ENCROACHMENT IN THE 100-YEAR
FLOODPLAIN UNLESS APPROVED BY TOWN ENGINEER.
9. A HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION SHALL BE FORMED FOR
THE SUBDIVISION, WHICH SHALL BE CHARGED WITH ■
411.„N SCALE: 1„=200'-0„ PRESERVATION OF THE PROTECTED RIPARIAN HABITAT IN AN ■■ planning resources
UNDISTURBED STATE.
P 9
11111
0 200' planning landscape architecture urban desion Qevelooment consultant
270 North Church Avenue,Tucson Arizona 85701 • (520f 628-1118 fax:628-7637
2111 East Broadway,Ste.14,Tempe Arizona 85282 • (602)921-0208 fax:921-9561
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
Planning and Zoning Division
11000 N.La Canada Drive
Oro Valley,Arizona 85737
Phone: 520-229-4849 or 229-4816
FAX No.: 520-742-1022
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TRANSMITTAL
TO: Pima County Assessor's/Susan King OV Parks/Ainsley Reeder
Pima County Department of Transportation OV PW/Craig Civalier
Pima County Department of Environmental Quality OV P&Z/Bayer Vella
TEP/Glynda Rothwell OV Water/Mark Moore
Amphitheater Public Schools/Ken Scoville OV P&Z/Dee Widero
Amphitheater Public Schools/Vicki Balentine OV Economic Dev./Jeff Weir
OV P&Z/Bryant Nodine
OV PD/Mike Schuh
OV Transit/John Zukas
Fire Marshall/Steve Schoon
PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 10-17-2003
FROM: Shirley Gay/Project Coordinator: e-mail sgay@orovalley.net
DATE: October 6,2003
Location: North West Corner of La Canada and Tanerine
Parcel#: 219-47-0170,0180,0050,0060,004A,004B,004C
OV#: OV9-03-27
Type: Rezoning from SR,and R1-144 to R1-72 and TP or CN
RESPONSE DUE BY: 10-17-03
IT WOULD BE APPRECIATED IF YOU COULD RESPOND WITH YOUR WRITTEN COMMENTS BELOW AND
RETURN A COPY OF THIS TRANSMITTAL TO ORO VALLEY PLANNING DEPT. Attn: Shirley Gay - Project
Coordinator.Please note,all responses will be made available to the applicant
COMMENTS: i& Q U .LL .aeeszris tbs._ 0.4.-sLa-
Gt.", c�i z) - i f j ter- j .' , �r -441/4_ "A c,-;_ s S aF--Lx-
N)Agency Signature40 ,ate /t3
F:\INDIVID\SAG\AGENCY\Transmittal OV9.doc
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
Planning and Zoning Division
11000 N.La Canada Drive
Oro Valley,Arizona 85737
Phone: 520-229-4849 or 229-4816
FAX No.: 520-742-1022
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TRANSMITTAL
TO: Pima County Assessor's/Susan King OV Parks/Ainsley Reeder
Pima County Department of Transportation OV PW/Craig Civalier
Pima County Department of Environmental Quality OV P&Z/Bayer Vella
TEP/Glynda Rothwell OV Water/Mark Moore
Amphitheater Public Schools/Ken Scoville OV P&Z/Dee Widero
Amphitheater Public Schools/Vicki Balentine OV Economic Dev./Jeff Weir
OV P&Z/Bryant Nodine
OV PD/Mike Schuh
OV Transit/John Zukas
Fire Marshall/Steve Schoon
PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 10-17-2003
FROM: Shirley Gay/Project Coordinator: e-mail sgay@orovalley.net
DATE: October 6,2003
Location: North West Corner of La Canada and Tanerine
Parcel#: 219-47-0170,0180,0050,0060,004A,004B,004C
OV#: OV9-03-27
Type: Rezoning from SR,and R1-144 to R1-72 and TP or CN
RESPONSE DUE BY: 10-17-03
IT WOULD BE APPRECIATED IF YOU COULD RESPOND WITH YOUR WRITTEN COMMENTS BELOW AND -
RETURN A COPY OF THIS TRANSMITTAL TO ORO VALLEY PLANNING DEPT. Attn: Shirley Gay - Project
Coordinator.Please note,all responses will be made available to the applicant
COMMENTS: - up 6`Zt 0.
�- t a f �- pit ,-fit-, fr&&- ( ) do
riteI a a /2, a!�° it oar. i3 -t c To vwo
fits t I I.
!�' f -for evtrii, occv 6 facP Ai. id' reasecliem9
w! 1 b D Gt1 dt cG f w 0 d h �
Agency LL)�k'V Signature a. Date 1 !74// A o � 3 ariooee
l ��f
F:\INDIVID\SAG\AGENCY\Transmittal OV9.doc
ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: SHIRLEY GAY, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR
FROM: MARK MOORE, NEW DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR
SUBJECT:NW CORNER OF TANGERINE/ LA CANADA OV-9-03-27
DATE: 10/15/2003
CC: DAVID RUIZ, ENGINEERING DIVISION ADMINISTRATOR
The following comments are submitted for the above referenced project:
• The proposed project lies within the Utility's"D&E"zone systems.
• An extension of the existing water infrastructure may be needed to serve this development.
• There is adequate capacity in the system to provide domestic and fire flow.
• The Fire Marshall must review and approval the number and location of fire hydrants before
water improvement plans can be approved for construction.
• A PCDEQ Certificate for the Approval to Construct will be required and provided to the
Utility before construction of the water improvements can begin.
• A Line Extension Agreement must be signed by the Developer and returned to the Utility
before service can be provided.
• The contractor must arrange for a pre-construction meeting with the Utility before
construction of the water system can begin.
• Easements for the placement of public water facilities, i.e., water lines, fire hydrants, etc., on
private property must be submitted to the Utility for review and approval. The approved legal
description and sketch will need to be recorded by the Engineer and a copy provided to the
Utility before new construction is finaled.
• These comments are not all inclusive as a water improvement plan must be submitted to the
utility for review.
Should you have any questions please call me at 229-5017
e/ ..,.- )4.
l.�'4
�`
.411xzolle`
PIMA COUNTY
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
201 N.Stone Avenue, 1st Floor
Tucson,Arizona 85701-1207
CARMINE DEBONIS JR. PHONE (520) 740-6520
Director FAX (520) 798-1836
MEMO TO: Shirley Gay,Project Coordinator
Town of Oro Valley
FROM: Maggie Shaw, Senior Civil Engineering Assistant ... l
Development Review Division(Environmental Quality)
SUBJECT: North West Corner of La Canada&Tangerine
OV9-03-27
DATE: October 10,2003
On behalf of Environmental Quality, the Rezoning has been reviewed for conformance with
Pima County Department of Environmental Quality requirements for on-site sewage disposal.
Please note the following comments:
1. The Department has no objection provided the property is served by public or private
sewer.
If you wish to discuss the above comments,please contact me at 740-6706.
Approval of the above project does not authorize construction of either a public or private sewer,
or a water line. Prior to construction,an Approval To Construct from Pima County
Environmental Quality may be necessary.
The Department's Air Quality Control District requires that air quality activity permits be
secured by the developer or prime contractor before constructing, operating or engaging in an
activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution.
MMS/ms
z -d eoT = TT CO OT 400
THE UNIVERSITY OF NOV 1 7 2003
Arizona State Museum ARIZONA.
P.O.Box 210026
Tucson,AZ 85721-0026 TUCSON ARIZONA
(520)621-6302
FAX:(520)621-2976
November 13, 2003
Bryant,Nodine
Planning and Zoning Administrator
Town of Oro Valley Planning and Zoning Division
11,000 N. La Canada Drive
Oro Valley,AZ 85737
Re: Oro Valley Planning and Zoning Department Memoranda
Dear Mr. Nodine:
As per your previous discussions with Mr. John Madsen,Permit's Administrator for the
Arizona State Museum,we are now reviewing the Oro Valley Planning and Zoning
Department Memoranda, and doing archaeological records checks for the indicated
parcel numbers. Attached please find the results of those records searches. In a few cases,
parcel numbers were missing or came up"no matches"on the Pima County Website. If it
was possible to determine the approximate location of the parcel(s),then a review for that
location was done. If it was not possible to determine the location,no review was
attempted.
Each review is followed by brief recommendations. Depending on the land form,the
surrounding site density, and other factors,the State Historic Preservation Office(SHPO)
recommends resurvey for anything surveyed over 10 years ago. In the following
recommendations,ASM has used 15 years as a cutoff for resurvey, unless there is
sufficient reason to sway the decision one way or the other.
If you have any questions,do not hesitate to call me.
Sincerely,
Cop y
Su Benaron
Assistant Permits Administrator
(520)621-2096
sbenaron@email.arizona.edu
/cc: Shirley Gay,Development Coordinator, Town of Oro Valley
tom /
♦ i
Oro Valley Projects
OV12-03-07
Parcel#s: 220-110-750 & -040-10K
Legal Description: portions of NE Y4 NW'A S08 & SE 'A SW'A S05, T12S R14E,
These parcels have not been surveyed. Several sites(AZ BB:9:49, 190, 191, 193, and
212) are within '/4-'/2 mile to east and northeast. ASM recommends a surface survey of
these parcels.
OV12-03-25
Parcel 220-090-240
Legal Description: SW'A NE Y4 SW'A S07 T12S R14E
Parcel was surveyed in 1988 by Cultural Environmental Systems(1988-93.ASM)
Three sites know in section: BB:9:2, 75, and 225(ASM). Depending on the landform,the
As this survey was done 15 years ago,ASM recommends that the parcel be resurveyed.
OV9-03-27
Parcels: 219-470-170 & 180
Legal Description: SE '/4 SE '/4 of S34 Ti1 S R13E
Parcel has not been surveyed. ASM recommends a surface survey of the parcel.
OV12-03-19
Parcel: 224-310-100
Legal Description: SE 'A SE Y4 S13 T12S R12E
Parcel has not been surveyed. Parcel just west of Oracle Rd. was surveyed(1999-
207.ASM)by OPAC. No archaeological resources were found. Oracle Rd itself is a
historical road(US/SR 80 AZ FF:9:17[ASM] and SR 89 AZ I:3:10[ASM]). ASM
recommends a surface survey of these parcels.
OV11-03-03
Parcels:224-33-007A, 008A, 011A
Legal Description: SE Y4 NW'/4 SE Y4
The property has not been surveyed. ASM recommends a surface survey of these parcels.
OV12-03-22
Parcel: 224-28-143A
Legal Description: SE Y4 SE Y4 S12 T12S R 13E
Property was surveyed in 2001 by Tierra(2001-93.ASM); no cultural resources found.
ASM recommends no further archaeological work is necessary for this parcel. If as yet
unknown archaeological resources are discovered in the course of development, please
have the landowner notify the Director of the ASM. If human remains or associated
funerary items are discovered please have the landowner contact Mr. John Madsen,
Repatriation Coordinator of the ASM, at 520-621-4795,pursuant to A.R.S. §41-865.
OV12-02-11
Parcel: 225-120-65A
Legal Description SW 1/4 SE 1A S24 T12S R12E
Property was surveyed by DAI(2003-562.ASM); found no sites, one isolated find. ASM
recommends no further archaeological work is necessary for this parcel. If as yet
unknown archaeological resources are discovered in the course of development,please
have the landowner notify the Director of the ASM. If human remains or associated
funerary items are discovered please have the landowner contact Mr. John Madsen,
Repatriation Coordinator of the ASM, at 520-621-4795,pursuant to A.R.S. §41-865.
OV12-03-17
Parcel:219-530-04T
Legal Description: SE 1/4 SW 1/4 NE 1/4 S36 Ti1 S R13E
Surveys: Rancho Vistoso Survey(1986-220.ASM)by Inst. for American Research;
WCRM(1994-279.ASM)Western Area Power 115Kv Transmission Line. Latter found
several Isolated Finds, including 14 sherds from two vessels that were found on or near
this parcel. One site(AZ:BB:9:284)is very close to property. The WCRM report states
(p.71)that probably"a substantial prehistoric component is buried."Rancho Vistoso is a
historic Road(AZ BB:5:123[ASM]). ASM recommends that the parcel be assessed for
the possibility of surface and subsurface remains related to the Isolated Finds and AZ
BB:9:2 84(ASM).
OV12-03-12
Parcel: 219-530-04E
Legal Description: NW NW SE S36 T11 S R13E
Surveys: Rancho Vistoso Survey(1986-220.ASM)by Inst. for American Research.
Nearby survey WCRM(1994-279.ASM) Western Area Power 115Kv Transmission Line.
found several Isolated Finds,and two sites(AZ:BB:9:284 &284) fairly close by.
Changing surface conditions and erosion can reveal sites that were previously buried. As
sites have been found nearby on property previously inspected during the Rancho Vistoso
Survey,ASM recommends that the parcel be reinspected.
OV12-03-24
Parcel: 224-310-09G
Legal Description: SW NE SE S13 T12S R13E
Surveys: The property has not been surveyed. Nearby surveys include: 1999-207(ASM)
by OPAC. It is possible that site BB:9:41(ASM), a historic wagon road whose exact
location is unknown,passes through the property. Oracle Road is historic US/SR 80 (AZ
FF:9:17[ASM]) and SR89(AZ I:3:10[ASM]). ASM recommends a surface survey of the
property.
OV12-03-23
Parcel: (listed)223-020-505 (Pima County Web Site has no record,but 2 Safeway-owned
properties are near the described location : 223-020-38A and-320)
Legal Description: Portions of SW TI1S R14E
Surveys: Rancho Vistoso Survey(1986-220.ASM)by Inst. for American Research.
Nearby surveys: 2001-700.ASM(SWCA), 1987-237.ASM(ARS),2001-162.ASM
(PAST). Site AZ BB:9:352(ASM)(found by PAST survey)is nearby, at SW corner of
Rancho Vistoso&Tangerine; Site AZ BB:9:262 is just south of Tangerine ca. 1/4 mile
east of Rancho Vistoso. Changing surface conditions and erosion can reveal sites that
were previously buried. As sites have been found nearby on property previously
inspected during the Rancho Vistoso Survey,ASM recommends that the parcel be
reinspected.
OV12-86-9B
Parcel:None given. Pusch Ridge at Reserve Lots 12-37
Legal Description: SW % S08 T12S R14E
Note: Without parcel numbers, it was difficult to determine the precise area of these lots,
but there have been no surveys in entire section. From the location of the Pusch Ridge
Lots on the Pima County Website, sites AZ BB:9:3,4, and 347(ASM) are in the
immediate area and may be on this property(they are described as being on the"Pusch
Ridge Property,"and"La Reserve." The first two of these sites are village sites,the latter
(BB:9:347) is a petroglyph site and rock ring near site BB:9:4. ASM recommends a
surface survey to determine if these or other archaeological resources are present on the
property.
OV12-03-13
Parcel: 225-142-460 (46A)
Legal Description: SE SW S25 T12S R13E
Parcel has not been surveyed. Nearby surveys include a survey by OPAC of an adjacent
property(1999-114.ASM), and several along Magee: Atzlan(2000-715.ASM); SRI
(1989-33.ASM), and DAI(1995-63-ASM). ASM recommends a surface survey of the
property.
OV12-03-26
Parcel:224-018-270
Legal Description: NE NE NE SO2 T12S R13E
Surveyed by PAST(1984-11.ASM).
Refer to Su Benaron's letter to Shirley Gay on 9/30/03 recommending resurvey because
of the 20-year time span since the previous survey.
p,�1--EY Aq� TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
oQo 0 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Planning and Zoning • Building Safety
11, 11000 N.La Canada Drive,Oro Valley,AZ 85737•(520)229-4800•Fax(520)742-1022
Oro Valley Public Library
ak AA, 1305 W.Naranja Drive,Oro Valley,AZ 85737• (520)229-5300•Fax(520)229-5319
A Parks and Recreation
Iw�QVN ED�9� 680 W.Calle Concordia,Oro Valley,AZ 85737•(520)229-5050•Fax(520)797-2202
D
November 25, 2003
Ms. Irene Volenick
Planning Resources
270 N. Church Avenue
Tucson, AZ
Fax: (520) 628-7637
RE: OV9-03-27,Pre-Application Comments from the October 17, 2003 Development
Review Committee for the proposed Rezoning from SR, and R1-144 zones to R1-72 and
TP or CN for seven parcels located at the northwest corner of Tangerine Road and La
Canada Drive extension.
Dear Ms. Volenick:
Community Development staff has reviewed the above-referenced pre-application
submittal, using the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised(OVZCR), and we offer the
following pre-application comments. Please note that these comments are preliminary in
nature due to the preliminary nature of your pre-application submittal.
Planning and Zoning Division
1. The OV9-03-27 Rezoning Application is for 7 parcels totaling 38.8 acres; only two
parcels lie within the Town of Oro Valley(TOV)jurisdiction. Those two parcels are
zoned low density residential (R1-144 District). The 1996 General Plan designates
those two parcels as Rural-Low-Density Residential which is reflected in the R1-144
zoning. The Applicant would need to seek and justify a General Plan(GP)
amendment from the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Town Council in
order to seek and justify a rezoning to a higher density residential and/or commercial
use. If the GP amendment is approved, the Applicant may seek a rezoning.
Please note that a"TP"District designation would need a General Plan designation of
either"Office"or"Commerce Park". Please see Section 8-503 to determine if the TP
(Technological Park) designation would allow the uses you may desire in your
Project. Please also see Section 8-103 to determine if the CN(Neighborhood
Commercial)designation would be better suited for your Project. A CN zoning
would require a GP land use designation of"Neighborhood Commercial". Please see
www.townoforovalley.com
November 25, 2003
Ms. Irene Volenick
OV9-03-27, Tangerine and La Canada rezoning
Page 2 of 3
Section 4.1.3 of the Land Use Element of the GP to determine which land use
designation is best for your Project.
Section 3-002 of OVZCR describes the procedures for amending the GP. The next
period to apply for a GP map amendment begins the first regular working day of
February 2004.
2. The properties not located within the Town limits would need to be annexed prior to
seeking a rezoning or a Memorandum of Understanding would have to be developed
with the County. Those properties are designated in the GP as Rural Low Density
Residential as well. It is suggested that the property owner(s) go forward with an
annexation effort.
3. The subject parcels contain a wash listed in the"ESL Riparian Update"data base
which has not yet been adopted as part of the OVZCR. Technically, the was is not
subject to the OVZCR Chaper 10 Riparian Habitat Protection Overlay District
standards. However, as part of a rezoning effort, we would ask that the wash be
preserved in accordance with those standards (see Article 10-7 of OVZCR as well as
the Open Space and Natural Resources Conservation Element of the General Plan).
TOV staff would like the Applicant to avoid vehicular crossing of the wash and
would like the Project to be designed in such a way as to place the lowest density uses
to the west of the wash(as you have indicated on the preliminary plans) and seek an
alternative vehicular access to those portions of the property to avoid a wash crossing.
4. The subject property lies within the Tangerine Corridor Overlay District(TRCOD)
which is described in Article 10-0 of OVZCR. Please see Section 10-005 to be
certain that the uses and building pad and roadway placements you desire will work
within the parameters of TRCOD.
5. Please incorporate plans for circulation that will be compatible with future
development to the north and west of the site.
TOV Public Works Division,
Engineering Comments, from Craig Civalier, dated October 16,2003
1. Provide a site analysis that conforms to Chapter 3, Section 3-104 of the OVZCR
2. It is recommend that the tentative development plan conform to Chapter 4,
Articles 4-3, 4-4 and 4-5, Chapter 15, the Grading Ordinance, and Chapter 27 of
the OVZCR.
3. Stormwater detention and first flush treatment will be required on this project.
4. All access points to La Canada Drive shall be located per the La Canada Drive
Road Improvement Plans, see attached plans. However, if the developer desires
the southern most access on La Canada Drive it shall be right in/right out.
November 25, 2003
Ms. Irene Volenick
OV9-03-27, Tangerine and La Canada rezoning
Page 3 of 3
5. The access point on Tangerine Road shall be located to the west property line as
far as possible. A deceleration right turn lane shall be provided on Tangerine
Road. Any adjustments to the pavement markings shall be the responsibility of
the developer.
6. All proposed street right-of-way widths shall be 50-ft.
7. This project shall be designed in conjunction with the Town's La Canada Drive
Extension Project and the Tangerine Road Improvement Project.
8. It is strongly recommended that the developer consider the method of providing
sanitary sewer to this site. Time is of the essence due to the Town's Tangerine
Road Improvement Project. It is desirable to install a sanitary sewer across
Tangerine Road before we pave. If this is not possible the sanitary sewer shall be
bored across Tangerine Road.
9. An additional 60-ft of right-of-way shall be provided to the Town along
Tangerine Road.
Other Agency Comments
Please see the attached comments from:
1. Pima County Development Services, Maggie Shaw, dated October 10, 2003.
We look forward to working with you on this Project. If you have any questions
regarding these comments please feel free to call me at(520)229-4814 or email me at
smontana@orovalley.net, or call any of the folks on the attached DRC contact sheet.
Sincerely,
Susana Montana, Planner II
Attachments:
1. Agency Comment Letter
2. DRC Agency Contact Sheet
3. General Plan Amendment Review Flow Chart
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT PROCESS
(applicant version)
GP Submittal /7
Staff Certification
/ Re-submittal /
Application submitted during
an approved submittal window
and all parts of the application Submittal
included. complete No
Yes ► P&Z Hearing
I. 4
Staff, DOC, & Recommend
County review
DRC Continue Deny Approve
Notify property
owners within 600' w
Comments
to applicant
Re-submittal Re-submittal
I
Submittal Submittal
No f-- complete NO �-- complete
Yes
TC Hearing 4 Yes
Continue Deny Approve
DOC=Department of Commerce
DRC= Development Review Committee
P&Z= Planning and Zoning Commission
TC=Town Council
Can submit to
Changes for Major Amendments: rezone
There can only be one submittal window,they must go to two Commission
hearings(in different locations), and all must be reviewed by the Council at the
same hearing_ There should also be at least one neighborhood meeting.
F:\Admin PZ\ORG-FLOW\GP Amend Flow Chart for applicants.doc 10/13/03