HomeMy WebLinkAboutPackets - Council Packets (2017)
*AMENDED (3/3/26, 4:00 PM)
AGENDA
ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL
REGULAR SESSION
MARCH 4, 2026
ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
11000 N. LA CAÑADA DRIVE
For information on public comment procedures, please see the instructions for in person and/or virtual
speakers at the end of the agenda.
To watch and/or listen to the public meeting online, please visit
https://www.orovalleyaz.gov/town/departments/town-clerk/meetings-and-agendas
Executive Sessions – Upon a vote of the majority of the Town Council, the Council may enter into
Executive Sessions pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes §38-431.03 (A)(3) to obtain legal advice on
matters listed on the Agenda.
REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS
MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS ON CURRENT EVENTS
TOWN MANAGER'S REPORT ON CURRENT EVENTS
ORDER OF BUSINESS: MAYOR WILL REVIEW THE ORDER OF THE MEETING
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
CALL TO AUDIENCE – At this time, any member of the public is allowed to address the Mayor and Town Council
on any issue not listed on today’s agenda. Pursuant to the Arizona Open Meeting Law, individual Council
Members may ask Town Staff to review the matter, ask that the matter be placed on a future agenda, or respond to
criticism made by speakers. However, the Mayor and Council may not discuss or take legal action on matters raised
during “Call to Audience.” In order to speak during “Call to Audience” please specify what you wish to discuss when
completing the blue speaker card.
PRESENTATIONS
1.Presentation and possible discussion of the Town's FY 25/26 Quarterly Financial Update through
December 2025
CONSENT AGENDA
(Consideration and/or possible action)
A.Minutes - February 18, 2026
REGULAR AGENDA
1.RESOLUTION NO. (R)26-08, PROVIDING NOTICE OF INTENT TO INCREASE THE POTABLE
WATER BASE RATES FOR THE ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY
2.RESOLUTION NO. (R)26-09, APPROVING A REVISION TO THE NARANJA DRIVE MULTI-USE PATH
ALIGNMENT VIA CHANGE ORDER TO THE CURRENT CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT BY THE
REALLOCATION OF FUNDING FROM THE ORO VALLEY DRIVE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT AND THE LA CANADA COBO IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
3.DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE DIRECTION FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT THE
INTERSECTION OF MUSETTE DRIVE AND TANGERINE ROAD
4.DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING CELL PHONE RECEPTION NORTH OF
TANGERINE ROAD, THE TOWN’S ROLE IN THIS MATTER AND WHAT THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
CAN DO TO ENCOURAGE GREATER COVERAGE AND ACCESS
FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS (The Council may bring forth general topics for future meeting agendas. Council may not
discuss, deliberate or take any action on the topics presented pursuant to ARS 38-431.02H)
*EXECUTIVE SESSION
1.*Pursuant to A.R.S. 38-431.03 (A)(3) and(A)(4) to discuss or consult with the attorneys for the public body
regarding a 60 day notice received from Archaeology Southwest regarding the Conservation Easement
*RESUME REGULAR SESSION
*CALL TO ORDER
*REGULAR AGENDA
5.*APPROVAL OF ANY DIRECTION TO THE TOWN ATTORNEY AND/OR NECESSARY STAFF AS
5.*APPROVAL OF ANY DIRECTION TO THE TOWN ATTORNEY AND/OR NECESSARY STAFF AS
DISCUSSED IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING THE 60 DAY NOTICE RECEIVED FROM
ARCHAEOLOGY SOUTHWEST REGARDING THE CONSERVATION EASEMENT
ADJOURNMENT
POSTED: 2/26/26 at 5:00 p.m. by ck
AMENDED AGENDA POSTED: 3/3/26 at 5:00 p.m. by ck
The Mayor and Council may, at the discretion of the meeting chairperson, discuss any Agenda item.
When possible, a packet of agenda materials as listed above is available for public inspection at least 24 hours
prior to the Council meeting in the office of the Town Clerk between the hours of 8:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m.
The Town of Oro Valley complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If any person with a disability
needs any type of accommodation, please notify the Town Clerk’s Office at least five days prior to the Council
meeting at 229-4700.
PUBLIC COMMENT ON AGENDA ITEMS
The Town has modified its public comment procedures for its public bodies to allow for limited remote/virtual
comment via Zoom. The public may provide comments remotely only on items posted as required Public Hearings,
provided the speaker registers 24 hours prior to the meeting. For all other items, the public may complete a blue
speaker card to be recognized in person by the Mayor, according to all other rules and procedures. Written
comments can also be emailed to Town Clerk Michael Standish at mstandish@orovalleyaz.gov for distribution to
the Town Council prior to the meeting. Further instructions to speakers are noted below.
INSTRUCTIONS TO IN-PERSON SPEAKERS
Members of the public shall be allowed to speak on posted public hearings and during Call to Audience when
attending the meeting in person. The public may be allowed to speak on other posted items on the agenda at the
discretion of the Mayor.
If you wish to address the Town Council on any item(s) on this agenda, please complete a blue speaker card
located on the Agenda table at the back of the room and give it to the Town Clerk. Please indicate on the blue
speaker card which item number and topic you wish to speak on, or, if you wish to speak during Call to Audience,
please specify what you wish to discuss.
Please step forward to the podium when the Mayor calls on you to address the Council.
1. For the record, please state your name and whether or not you are a Town resident.
2. Speak only on the issue currently being discussed by Council. You will only be allowed to
address the Council one time regarding the topic being discussed.
3. Please limit your comments to 3 minutes.
4. During Call to Audience, you may address the Council on any matter that is not on the agenda.
5. Any member of the public speaking must speak in a courteous and respectful manner to those
present.
INSTRUCTIONS TO VIRTUAL SPEAKERS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS
Members of the public may attend the meeting virtually and request to speak virtually on any agenda item that is
listed as a Public Hearing. If you wish to address the Town Council virtually during any listed Public Hearing,
please complete the online speaker form by clicking here https://forms.orovalleyaz.gov/forms/bluecard at least 24
hours prior to the start of the meeting. You must provide a valid email address in order to register. Town Staff will
email you a link to the Zoom meeting the day of the meeting. After being recognized by the Mayor, staff will
unmute your microphone access and you will have 3 minutes to address the Council. Further
instructions regarding remote participation will be included in the email.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Town Council Regular Session 1.
Meeting Date:03/04/2026
Presentation and possible discussion of the Town's FY 25/26 Quarterly Financial Update through December 2025
Subject
Presentation and possible discussion of the Town's FY 25/26 Quarterly Financial Update through December 2025
Summary
Please reference the attachments to this agenda item.
Attachments
December 2025 Monthly Financial Report
Town Manager’s Office
TOWN COUNCIL REPORT
DATE: February 24, 2026
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: Jeff Wilkins, Town Manager
David Gephart, Chief Financial Officer
SUBJECT: December 2025 Financial Update
This financial update is intended to provide an overview and status of revenues and expenditures for the
Town’s selected funds through December 2025 for fiscal year 2025/26. Funds included in this financial
update are the General Fund, Highway Fund, Community Center Fund and Capital Fund. Also included
are the two enterprise funds, Water and Stormwater. Please note that all amounts are preliminary, un-
audited and subject to change. Additionally, figures may not include any adjusting audit entries
required at year-end.
Pages 1-15 are the financial status reports for the funds. Appendix 1 and 2 provide further details on golf
activity and contractor performance. Appendix 3 is the consolidated report of all Town funds. Appendix 4
is the General Fund sales tax collections. Appendix 5 is the General Fund state shared revenues. Appendix
6 is a breakdown of the Town’s outstanding debt service principal and interest payments. Appendix 7 is a
summary of operating investment values and earnings by month. Appendix 8 lists the specific infrastructure
projects that are eligible to receive funding from impact fees.
General Fund
Financial Status Fiscal Year to Date: December 2025
Revenues `
Amount Percent
Local Sales Tax 12,813,938$ 12,630,584$ 32,470,107$ (19,839,523)$ 39% 27,687,694$
State Shared Revenues 10,117,909 9,823,126 19,863,884 (10,040,758) 49% 19,809,058
Licenses & Permits 925,527 1,492,504 2,116,123 (623,619) 71% 2,317,479
Grants 233,797 408,347 466,851 (58,504) 87% 698,219
Intergovernmental 400,602 1,023,786 2,320,362 (1,296,576) 44% 2,320,362
Charges for Service 1,483,576 1,561,000 3,050,223 (1,489,223) 51% 3,095,270
Other Revenue 988,917 425,369 916,480 (491,111) 46% 942,999
Total Revenues 26,964,266$ 27,364,715$ 61,204,030$ (33,839,315)$ 45% 56,871,082$
Uses
Amount Percent
Personnel Services 16,265,360$ 17,121,828$ 37,457,276$ 20,335,448$ 46% 36,515,935$
Operations and Maintenance 7,190,647 7,028,157 15,317,790 8,289,633 46% 15,104,790
Capital Outlay 88,139 84,559 211,000 126,442 40% 211,000
Transfers Out 5,458,073 8,203,829 8,831,579 627,750 93% 8,831,579
Total Uses 29,002,218$ 32,438,373$ 61,817,645$ 29,379,272$ 52% 60,663,304$
Change in Fund Balance
Total Revenues 26,964,266$ 27,364,715$ 61,204,030$ 56,871,082$ 56,871,082$
Total Uses (29,002,218) (32,438,373) (61,817,645) (60,663,304) (60,663,304)
Change in Fund Balance (2,037,952)$ (5,073,657)$ (613,615)$ (3,792,222)$ (3,792,222)$
Beginning Fund Balance 20,702,401$ 20,702,401$
Estimated Ending Fund Balance 15,628,744$ 16,910,179$ 16,910,179$
Note: The estimated ending fund balance exceeds the Town's 25% expenditure reserve policy by a margin of about $4 million.
FY 2024/25
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Budget
Actual Vs. Budget
FY 2025/26
Budget
Year End
Estimate
Year End
Estimate
Year End
Estimate
FY 2024/25
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Budget
Actual Vs. Budget
FY 2024/25
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Actuals
Page 1 of 14
General Fund
Financial Status Fiscal Year to Date: December 2025
Local Sales Tax Revenue
Amount Percent
Construction 2,214,393$ 930,859$ 5,086,266$ (4,155,407)$ 18% 2,130,135$
Utilities 2,235,783 2,186,218 4,316,890 (2,130,672) 51% 3,870,678
Retail 4,431,208 5,168,863 11,836,368 (6,667,505) 44% 11,263,467
Remote Seller 885,636 1,217,242 2,444,773 (1,227,531) 50% 2,672,498
Bed Tax 954,090 737,485 2,464,858 (1,727,373) 30% 1,890,713
Restaurant & Bar 1,283,468 1,502,805 3,726,636 (2,223,831) 40% 3,463,696
Other 642,439 722,858 1,941,265 (1,218,407) 37% 1,743,456
Cable Franchise 166,920 164,255 653,051 (488,796) 25% 653,051
Local Sales Tax Total 12,813,938$ 12,630,584$ 32,470,107$ (19,839,523)$ 39% 27,687,694$
State Shared Revenue
Amount Percent
State Income Tax 5,138,550$ 4,761,332$ 9,522,662$ (4,761,330)$ 50% 9,522,662$
State Sales Tax 3,585,804 3,633,129 7,376,599 (3,743,470) 49% 7,376,599
Vehicle License Tax 1,255,378 1,297,522 2,629,797 (1,332,275) 49% 2,629,797
Smart and Safe 138,177 131,143 334,826 (203,683) 39% 280,000
State Shared Total 10,117,909$ 9,823,126$ 19,863,884$ (10,040,758)$ 49% 19,809,058$
FY 2024/25
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Budget
Actual Vs. Budget Year End
Estimate
Year End
Estimate
FY 2024/25
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Budget
Actual Vs. Budget
Total state shared revenues are performing in line with expectations with the
exception of Smart & Safe revenues.
Smart & Safe distributions occur twice per year, and the first payment was lower
than the prior year. Although statewide marijuana sales tax collections are up
compared to last year, distributions to cities and towns may decline because
revenues are first applied to cover state administrative and enforcement costs
before being allocated to cities and towns.
Overall, Local sales tax revenues are forecasted to fall short of budget
expectations by $4.7 million or 15%.
Sales tax collections decreased 9.7% compared to the same period last year, a
steeper decline than originally forecasted, primarily reflecting reduced activity in
the construction and hotel sectors. Construction-related revenue reflects both
the broader slowdown and specific project delays affecting the Marketplace hotel
and Vistoso Golf Club property apartment developments. Revenue is projected
to increase later in the fiscal year from the Oro Valley Marketplace apartment
project and renovation work advances at the Roche Ventana building. Retail and
restaurant sectors continue to perform consistently, and remote seller
collections maintains a positive growth trajectory.
Please refer to Appendix 4 for a detailed breakdown of local sales tax
collections.
$4.8
$3.6
$1.3
$0.1
$0
$1
$2
$3
$4
$5
$6
$7
$8
$9
$10
State Income Tax State Sales Tax Vehicle License
Tax
Smart and Safe
Mi
l
l
i
o
n
s
FY 2024/25 Actuals FY 2025/26 Actuals FY 2025/26 Budget
$0.9
$2.2
$5.2
$1.2 $0.7 $1.5 $0.7 $0.2$0
$2
$4
$6
$8
$10
$12
$14
Mi
l
l
i
o
n
s
FY 2024/25 Actuals FY 2025/26 Actuals FY 2025/26 Budget
Page 2 of 14
General Fund
Financial Status Fiscal Year to Date: December 2025
Licenses & Permits Revenue
Amount Percent
Business Licenses & Permits 131,172$ 107,968$ 255,000$ (147,032)$ 42% 229,304$
Residential Building Permits 491,291 919,258 908,066 11,192 101% 1,346,042
Commercial Building Permits 182,822 277,805 750,077 (472,272) 37% 452,101
Other Building Permits and Fees 120,243 187,473 202,980 (15,507) 92% 290,032
Licenses & Permits Total 925,527$ 1,492,504$ 2,116,123$ (623,619)$ 71% 2,317,479$
Grants Revenue
Amount Percent
Federal grants 198,951$ 344,184$ 375,000$ (30,816)$ 92% 581,368$
State Grants 34,846 64,163 91,851 (27,688) 70% 116,851
Grants Total 233,797$ 408,347$ 466,851$ (58,504)$ 87% 698,219$
A total of 51 Single Family Residential (SFR) permits have been issued through
December (107 budgeted for the year).
Licenses and permits revenue is projected to exceed budget by 9.5%
overall, driven primarily by stronger building permit activity. The business
license and permit forecast was reduced 10% after FY25 actuals fell below
estimates. While commercial building permit activity exceeded expectations,
supporting a $200,000 increase to the estimate, $400,000 was reclassified to
residential permits for the Marketplace apartments and approximately 8% was
shifted to grading permit fees for the Oro Valley Marketplace project, resulting in
a net downward adjustment. These changes were partly offset by a $87,000
increase in other building permit revenues from large grading permits and
stronger fire permit activity.
Year End
Estimate
Grant revenues are performing better than expected.
A significant portion of the budgeted grants are allocated to the Police
Department. These grants can fluctuate based on factors such as officer
scheduling, overtime, and the timing of reimbursements and awards from grant
programs. The forecast for federal grant revenues has been increased by 55%,
reflecting funding from the HIDTA program and the Department of Homeland
Security.
About $72,000 of budgeted state grants is related to school resource officer
reimbursements for Leman Academy.
FY 2024/25
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Budget
Actual Vs. Budget
FY 2024/25
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Budget
Actual Vs. Budget Year End
Estimate
$0.1
$0.9
$0.3 $0.2
$0.0
$0.2
$0.4
$0.6
$0.8
$1.0
Business
Licenses &
Permits
Residential
Building Permits
Commercial
Building Permits
Other Building
Permits and
Fees
Mi
l
l
i
o
n
s
FY 2024/25 Actuals FY 2025/26 Actuals FY 2025/26 Budget
$0.3
$0.1
$0.0
$0.1
$0.2
$0.3
$0.4
Federal grants State Grants
Mi
l
l
i
o
n
s
FY 2024/25 Actuals FY 2025/26 Actuals FY 2025/26 Budget
Page 3 of 14
General Fund
Financial Status Fiscal Year to Date: December 2025
Intergovernmental Revenue
Amount Percent
School Resource Officers 77,436$ 151,437$ 409,502$ (258,065)$ 37% 409,502$
RTA Reimbursements 323,166 872,349 1,904,860 (1,032,511) 46% 1,904,860
PC Library District Reimburse - - 6,000 (6,000) - 6,000
Intergovernmental Total 400,602$ 1,023,786$ 2,320,362$ (1,296,576)$ 44% 2,320,362$
Charges for Service Revenue
Amount Percent
Enterprise Funds Cost Allocation 850,880$ 820,674$ 1,641,347$ (820,673)$ 50% 1,641,347$
Recreation Fees 448,118 487,295 978,950 (491,655) 50% 1,009,434
Development Fees 41,403 74,877 90,110 (15,233) 83% 115,110
Court Fees 55,020 55,712 115,000 (59,288) 48% 115,000
Other 88,155 122,442 224,816 (102,374) 54% 214,379
Charges for Service Total 1,483,576$ 1,561,000$ 3,050,223$ (1,489,223)$ 51% 3,095,270$
Charges for services are performing slightly greater than expectations.
Cost allocation charges to the Town’s enterprise funds for shared services,
along with Parks & Recreation fees, represent the majority of this revenue
category. The enterprise fund allocations are budgeted amounts distributed
evenly across all 12 months. The year-over-year decrease is mainly due to one-
time water system monitoring upgrades in the prior year that were funded
through the IT budget and charged to the Water Utility.
Recreation fee revenues were revised up 3.1% over budget, reflecting greater
field and court rentals than originally anticipated. Development fee revenues
were increased by $25,000 due to higher-than-expected engineering plan review
fees related to the Marketplace development.
FY 2024/25
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Budget
Actual Vs. Budget Year End
Estimate
Year End
Estimate
Intergovernmental revenues are performing in line with expectations.
These revenues are reimbursement-based and typically lag between the time
services are provided and when funds are received.
FY 2024/25
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Budget
Actual Vs. Budget
$0.2
$0.9
$0.0
$0.0
$0.5
$1.0
$1.5
$2.0
$2.5
School Resource
Officers
RTA Reimbursements PC Library District
Reimburse
Mi
l
l
i
o
n
s
FY 2024/25 Actuals FY 2025/26 Actuals FY 2025/26 Budget
$0.8
$0.5
$0.1 $0.1 $0.1
$0.0
$0.5
$1.0
$1.5
$2.0
Enterprise
Funds Cost
Allocation
Recreation
Fees
Development
Fees
Court Fees Other
Mi
l
l
i
o
n
s
FY 2024/25 Actuals FY 2025/26 Actuals FY 2025/26 Budget
Page 4 of 14
General Fund
Financial Status Fiscal Year to Date: December 2025
Other Revenue
Amount Percent
Fines 33,334$ 26,022$ 68,680$ (42,658)$ 38% 56,000$
Interest Earnings 420,465 343,913 637,500 (293,587) 54% 650,000
Miscellaneous 535,118 55,434 210,300 (154,866) 26% 236,999
Other Revenue Total 988,917$ 425,369$ 916,480$ (491,111)$ 46% 942,999$
FY 2024/25
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Budget
Actual Vs. Budget Year End
Estimate
The year-over-year decrease of miscellaneous revenue is due to a one-time
rebate received from the Arizona Municipal Risk Retention Pool (AMRRP) in the
prior year.
Overall, other revenues are performing above expectations, driven by a higher
interest earnings and in-lieu income. The miscellaneous revenue forecast was
also increased due to insurance recoveries and asset sales.
$0.0
$0.3
$0.1
$0.00
$0.10
$0.20
$0.30
$0.40
$0.50
$0.60
$0.70
Fines Interest Earnings Miscellaneous
Mi
l
l
i
o
n
s
FY 2024/25 Actuals FY 2025/26 Actuals FY 2025/26 Budget
Page 5 of 14
General Fund
Financial Status Fiscal Year to Date: December 2025
Expenditures by Department
Amount Percent
Clerk 255,331$ 199,188$ 446,275$ 247,087$ 45% 434,253$
Community & Econ. Dev. 1,665,087 1,553,713 4,275,011 2,721,298 36% 3,990,726
Council 134,851 134,357 216,163 81,806 62% 216,163
Finance 409,682 378,387 829,265 450,878 46%845,073
Non-Departmental 1,480,541 1,550,967 3,093,317 1,542,351 50% 3,093,317
Human Resources 315,434 331,010 744,887 413,877 44% 738,643
Information Technology 3,299,455 3,278,319 5,925,996 2,647,677 55% 5,795,867
Legal 512,726 454,212 1,193,587 739,375 38% 928,653
Town Manager 759,457 778,820 1,812,726 1,033,906 43% 1,785,399
Parks & Recreation 2,225,480 2,210,765 5,230,510 3,019,745 42% 5,071,840
Police 9,197,509 10,094,302 21,333,810 11,239,508 47% 21,066,750
Public Works 2,831,916 2,794,224 6,702,762 3,908,538 42% 6,731,762
Town Court 456,676 476,280 1,181,757 705,477 40% 1,133,279
Total Department Expenditures 23,544,146$ 24,234,544$ 52,986,066$ 28,751,522$ 46% 51,831,725$
FY 2024/25
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Budget
Actual Vs. Budget Year End
Estimate
$0.2 $1.6 $0.1 $0.4 $1.6 $0.3
$3.3
$0.5 $0.8 $2.2
$10.1
$2.8
$0.5 $0.0
$5.0
$10.0
$15.0
$20.0
$25.0
Mi
l
l
i
o
n
s
FY 2024/25 Actuals FY 2025/26 Actuals FY 2025/26 Budget
Overview:
Departments are spending within budget limits through December. Please note that Council and Information Technology typically incur higher upfront costs
early in the fiscal year.
Community & Economic Development:
Year-to-date personnel expenditures are below budget expectations due to turnover in two Building Inspector positions, the Economic Development
Program Manager, and a vacancy in the Code Compliance Specialist position. Year-to-date operating expenditures are also below budget, primarily due to
timing within the in-house Economic Development and Tourism program, where several planned initiatives have not yet begun.
Finance: Personnel costs are projected to exceed budget by approximately $16,000 due to a three-month overlap in the accounting specialist position,
allowing time to train the new employee who replaced a retiring staff member.
Legal: Personnel costs are trending below budget expectations and are projected to finish approximately 24% under budget, primarily due to current
vacancies in the Town Attorney and Chief Civil Deputy Attorney positions.
Police: The year-over-year increase is mainly due to an additional quarterly pension contribution to the Public Safety Personnel Retirement System
(PSPRS) that was recorded at the beginning of FY26 but applied to the prior fiscal year (FY25), along with increased personnel costs from wage
adjustments outlined in the most recent labor agreement. The department is still forecasted to be within budget due to vacancy savings and benefit election
differences from budget.
Public Works: Transit personnel costs are projected to exceed budget by $29,000 (0.7%) due to higher ridership demand requiring additional driver hours.
Please note, however, that Transit costs are reimbursed to the Town by the RTA.
Page 6 of 14
Highway Fund
Financial Status Fiscal Year to Date: December 2025
Sources `
Amount Percent
Licenses & Permits 21,232$ 15,345$ 30,000$ (14,656)$ 51% 35,000$
Highway User Revenue 2,056,452 2,058,671 4,456,367 (2,397,696) 46% 4,290,852
Interest Earnings 49,732 66,698 99,000 (32,302) 67% 120,000
Miscellaneous 2,835 38,783 2,500 36,283 1551% 40,489
Transfers In 2,000,000 1,000,000 2,000,000 (1,000,000) 50% 2,000,000
Total Sources 4,130,250$ 3,179,496$ 6,587,867$ (3,408,371)$ 48% 6,486,341$
Expenditures
Amount Percent
Personnel 603,770$ 622,424$ 1,348,218$ 725,794$ 46% 1,350,500$
O&M 507,299 524,357 1,317,935 793,578 40% 1,283,443
Capital Outlays 1,994,848 1,371,850 4,790,000 3,418,150 29% 4,790,000
Total Expenditures 3,105,917$ 2,518,631$ 7,456,153$ 4,937,522$ 34% 7,423,943$
Change in Fund Balance
Total Sources 4,130,250$ 3,179,496$ 6,587,867$ 6,486,341$
Total Expenditures (3,105,917) (2,518,631) (7,456,153) (7,423,943)
Change in Fund Balance 1,024,333$ 660,865$ (868,286)$ (937,603)$
Beginning Fund Balance 1,598,787$ 1,598,787$
Estimated Ending Fund Balance 2,259,652$ 661,184$
FY 2024/25
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Budget
Actual Vs. Budget
FY 2024/25
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Budget
Actual Vs. Budget
Year End
Estimate
Year End
Estimate
FY 2024/25
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Budget
Year End
Estimate
Highway Fund revenues and expenditures are performing generally in line with expectations through December. Due to HURF trending below
projections, the fund balance is expected to end about $69,000 less than budgeted.
Revenues:
Highway User Revenue (HURF) is currently coming in slightly under budget projections. In contrast, interest earnings and revenue from licenses and
permits are outperforming budget estimates. Miscellaneous revenues are above budget, driven by insurance reimbursements and proceeds from asset
sales. The scheduled $2 million transfer from the Capital Fund is allocated to support road improvement projects and is recognized evenly over the
course of the fiscal year.
Expenditures:
Personnel expenditures are projected to exceed budget by approximately 0.2%, primarily due to adjustments to maximum pay ranges in the adopted pay
plan that were not included in the original personnel forecast. Budgeted capital outlays include the Town’s annual pavement preservation program and
several capital improvement projects.
Page 7 of 14
Community Center Fund
Financial Status Fiscal Year to Date: December 2025
Revenues
Amount Percent
Local Sales Tax 1,807,862$ 593,099$ -$ 593,099$ na 593,099$
Contracted Operating Revenues 2,603,487 2,849,724 5,625,078 (2,775,354) 51% 6,604,000
Town Operating Revenues 652,793 680,537 1,534,043 (853,506) 44% 1,605,076
Other Revenues 5,324 29,654 60,172 (30,518) 49% 87,700
Total Revenues 5,069,466$ 4,153,014$ 7,219,293$ (3,066,279)$ 58% 8,889,875$
Uses
Amount Percent
Contracted Operating Expenditures 2,886,865$ 2,917,473$ 5,728,637$ 2,811,164$ 51% 5,989,482$
Town Operating Expenditures 1,049,284 1,137,176 2,427,461 1,290,285 47% 2,439,344
Capital Outlay 621,249 368,388 2,408,700 2,040,312 15% 2,408,700
Transfers Out 1,717,149 172,968 172,968 - 100% 172,968
Total Uses 6,274,547$ 4,596,005$ 10,737,766$ 6,141,761$ 43% 11,010,494$
Change in Fund Balance
Total Revenues 5,069,466$ 4,153,014$ 7,219,293$ 8,889,875$
Total Uses (6,274,547) (4,596,005) (10,737,766) (11,010,494)
Change in Fund Balance (1,205,082)$ (442,992)$ (3,518,473)$ (2,120,619)$
Beginning Fund Balance 2,921,900$ 2,921,900$
Estimated Ending Fund Balance 2,478,908$ 801,281$
FY 2024/25
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Actuals
FY 2024/25
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Budget
Actual Vs. Budget Year End
Estimate
FY 2024/25
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Budget
FY 2025/26
Budget
Year End
Estimate
Actual Vs. Budget
Year End
Estimate
Page 8 of 14
Community Center Fund
Financial Status Fiscal Year to Date: December 2025
Local Sales Tax Revenue
Amount Percent
Retail 1,107,802$ 367,836$ -$ 367,836$ - 367,836$
Remote Seller 221,409 79,650 - 79,650$ - 79,650
Restaurant & Bar 320,867 101,493 - 101,493 - 101,493
Other 157,784 44,120 - 44,120 - 44,120
Local Sales Tax Total 1,807,862$ 593,099$ -$ 593,099$ - 593,099$
Contracted Operating Revenue
Amount Percent
Golf Revenue, Trail & Cart Fees 1,198,378$ 1,323,395$ 2,818,625$ (1,495,230)$ 47% 3,424,000$
Member Dues 838,131 950,091 1,590,560 (640,469) 60%1,800,000
Food & Beverage (Overlook) 377,499 420,791 814,633 (393,842) 52%924,000
Merchandise & Other 189,478 155,447 401,260 (245,813) 39% 456,000
Contracted Revenue Total 2,603,487$ 2,849,724$ 5,625,078$ (2,775,354)$ 51% 6,604,000$
FY 2024/25
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Actuals
FY 2024/25
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Actuals
Contracted golf revenues are forecasted to exceed budget by approximately
$979,000, or 17%, driven by strong membership numbers and increased public
play. Through December, 47,340 rounds have been played, which is essentially
in line with the prior year, reflecting a 0.1% decrease, and exceeding budget
expectations by 7.2%.
Please refer to Appendix 3 for or a more in-depth analysis of golf revenues,
expenses, and historical comparisons
Note: Estimated sales tax collections on golf operations for FY 2025/26 is
$174,562.
On August 13, 2025, the Town Council adopted Ordinance (O)25-04, removing
the spending restrictions on the half-cent sales tax and redirecting those
revenues to the General Fund, effective 30 days later in September.
Accordingly, the FY 2025/26 actual revenues shown here reflect only the first
two months of the fiscal year, during which the restriction was still in place. Any
operating shortfalls within this fund will be covered by transfers from the General
Fund at year-end.
For detailed information on total local sales tax collections, please refer to
Appendix 4.
FY 2025/26
Budget
FY 2025/26
Budget
Actual Vs. Budget Year End
Estimate
Year End
Estimate
Actual Vs. Budget
$1.3
$1.0
$0.4
$0.2
$0.0
$0.5
$1.0
$1.5
$2.0
$2.5
$3.0
Golf Revenue,
Trail & Cart
Fees
Member Dues Food &
Beverage
(Overlook)
Merchandise &
Other
Mi
l
l
i
o
n
s
FY 2024/25 Actuals FY 2025/26 Actuals FY 2025/26 Budget
$0.4
$0.1 $0.1 $0.0
$0.0
$0.2
$0.4
$0.6
$0.8
$1.0
$1.2
Retail Remote Seller Restaurant &
Bar
Other
Mi
l
l
i
o
n
s
FY 2024/25 Actuals FY 2025/26 Actuals FY 2025/26 Budget
Page 9 of 14
Community Center Fund
Financial Status Fiscal Year to Date: December 2025
Town Operating Revenue
Amount Percent
Daily Drop-Ins 34,369$ 26,807$ 75,625$ (48,818)$ 35% 63,233$
Member Dues 496,971 538,984 990,420 (451,436) 54% 1,103,100
Recreation Programs 73,531 60,884 382,500 (321,616) 16% 330,884
Facility Rental Income 47,922 53,861 85,498 (31,637) 63% 107,860
Town Operating Revenue Total 652,793$ 680,537$ 1,534,043$ (853,506)$ 44% 1,605,076$
Other Revenue
Amount Percent
Interest Income 2,961$ 29,585$ 22,500$ 7,085$ 131% 50,000
HOA Contributions - - 34,050 (34,050) - 34,050
Miscellaneous 2,363 69 3,622 (3,553) 2% 3,650
Other Revenue Total 5,324$ 29,654$ 60,172$ (30,518)$ 49% 87,700$
FY 2025/26
Actuals
FY 2024/25
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Actuals
FY 2024/25
Actuals
Year End
Estimate
The FY 2025/26 HOA contribution budget pertains to the HOAs associated with
the 9-hole Pusch Ridge course. FY 2025 was the final year of agreed upon
annual contributions to golf from HOAs on the 36-hole course.
Due to stronger-than-anticipated interest income, the year-end estimate has
been revised upward to $50,000.
FY 2025/26
Budget
Actual Vs. Budget
FY 2025/26
Budget
Actual Vs. Budget Year End
Estimate
Town operating revenues are generally trending above budget. Daily drop-in
fees and in-house recreation programs are trending below budget, offset by
higher-than-expected member dues. Year-end estimates have been updated to
reflect Town Council–approved rate increases effective January 1, 2026.
The year-end estimate has been further refined to reflect lower anticipated
revenues from membership dues and recreation programs, partially offset by
slight increases in daily drop-ins and facility rental income.$0.0
$0.5
$0.1 $0.1
$0.0
$0.2
$0.4
$0.6
$0.8
$1.0
$1.2
Daily Drop-Ins Member Dues Recreation
Programs
Facility Rental
Income
Mi
l
l
i
o
n
s
FY 2024/25 Actuals FY 2025/26 Actuals FY 2025/26 Budget
$0.0
$0.0 $0.0
$0.0
$0.1
Interest Income HOA Contributions Miscellaneous
Mi
l
l
i
o
n
s
FY 2024/25 Actuals FY 2025/26 Actuals FY 2025/26 Budget
Page 10 of 14
Community Center Fund
Financial Status Fiscal Year to Date: December 2025
Contracted Operating Expenditures
Amount Percent
Personnel 950,281$ 994,033$ 1,992,268$ 998,235$ 50% 2,063,000$
Food & Beverage (Overlook) 355,344 370,884 751,271 380,387 49% 837,000
Operations & Maintenance 1,499,900 1,460,301 2,768,538 1,308,237 53% 2,849,678
Equipment Leases 81,341 92,255 216,560 124,305 43% 239,804
Contracted Expenditures Total 2,886,865$ 2,917,473$ 5,728,637$ 2,811,164$ 51% 5,989,482$
Town Operating Expenditures
Amount Percent
Personnel 611,104$ 586,287$ 1,303,239$ 716,952 45% 1,300,447$
Operations & Maintenance 438,179 550,888 1,124,222 573,334 49% 1,138,897
Town Operating Expenditures Total 1,049,284$ 1,137,176$ 2,427,461$ 1,290,285$ 47% 2,439,344$
FY26 Revised
Budget
Artificial Turf Installation at Community Center Entrance 150,000
Community Center Exterior Stucco Repair and Painting 190,500
Community Center Parking Lot Resurface 950,000
CRC ADA Exterior Restroom 325,000
Greenmaster Mower Replacement x2 (36-Hole)120,000
South Pump Station (36 Hole) 510,000
Pusch Ridge Tennis Bleachers and ADA Accessibility 163,200
2,408,700
FY 2024/25
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Budget
Actual Vs. Budget
List of FY26 Capital Projects:
Year End
Estimate
Town operating expenditures are trending above budget, primarily due to higher
credit card merchant fees, partially offset by modest projected savings in
personnel costs.
FY 2024/25
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Budget
Actual Vs. Budget
Year End
Estimate
Contracted golf operating expenditures increased by 1.1% compared to the
same period last year, primarily due to higher labor and lease costs, partially
offset by water savings. Expenses are projected to exceed the budget by
approximately $261,000, or 4.6%, driven by higher merchandise sales costs,
increased labor expenses, and additional equipment and grounds maintenance
costs.
$0.6 $0.6
$0.0
$0.2
$0.4
$0.6
$0.8
$1.0
$1.2
$1.4
Personnel Operations & Maintenance
Mi
l
l
i
o
n
s
FY 2024/25 Actuals FY 2025/26 Actuals FY 2025/26 Budget
$1.0
$0.4
$1.5
$0.1
$0.0
$0.5
$1.0
$1.5
$2.0
$2.5
$3.0
Personnel Food & Beverage
(Overlook)
Operations &
Maintenance
Equipment
Leases
Mi
l
l
i
o
n
s
FY 2024/25 Actuals FY 2025/26 Actuals FY 2025/26 Budget
Page 11 of 14
Capital Fund
Financial Status Fiscal Year to Date: December 2025
Sources `
Amount Percent
Vehicle Reserves 466,745$ 514,463$ 1,028,926$ (514,463)$ 50%
Interest Earnings 308,034 289,250 470,000 (180,750) 62%
Miscellaneous 3,722 84,239 40,000 44,239 211%
Transfers In from General Fund 3,569,894 4,500,000 5,000,000 (500,000) 90%
Total Sources 4,348,395$ 5,387,952$ 6,538,926$ (1,150,974)$ 82%
Uses
Amount Percent
O&M 61,604$ 7,811$ -$ (7,811)$ na
Capital Outlays 2,467,169 5,779,834 11,867,973 6,088,139 49%
Transfers Out 2,000,000 1,059,109 2,234,200 1,175,091 47%
Total Uses 4,528,774$ 6,846,754$ 14,102,173$ 7,255,419$ 49%
Change in Fund Balance
Total Sources 4,348,395$ 5,387,952$ 6,538,926$
Total Uses (4,528,774) (6,846,754) (14,102,173)
Change in Fund Balance (180,379)$ (1,458,802)$ (7,563,247)$
Beginning Fund Balance 16,847,866$
Estimated Ending Fund Balance 9,284,619$
FY 2024/25
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Budget
FY 2024/25
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Budget
Actual Vs. Budget
FY 2024/25
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Budget
Actual Vs. Budget
Sources:
Quarterly transfers in from the General Fund support capital improvement projects as budgeted. A one-time additional transfer of $2 million
resulted from Town Council's direction to reduce the General Fund reserve from 30% to 25%. In addition, an annual reserve for vehicle
replacement is established based on the purchase price and expected lifespan of Town-owned vehicles. This reserve is allocated evenly over
twelve months and charged to the General Fund each month.
Uses:
O&M costs reflect the purchase of smaller, non-capitalized equipment used to outfit new Police vehicles. Capital outlays through December
consist primarily of the Council-directed purchase of a building for the planned new Police Headquarters (approximately $3.8 million), along with
related urgent building maintenance and inspection costs, the finalization of the Town Court expansion project, the VTNP Pond Restoration
project, and planned Police vehicle replacements. The budget also includes $2 million in transfers to the Highway Fund for capital improvement
projects, recorded evenly across four quarters. An additional $234,200 is budgeted for transfer to the Grants Fund to cover the Town’s 20%
match for transit vehicles funded primarily through federal grants.
Page 12 of 14
Water Utility Fund
Financial Status Fiscal Year to Date: December 2025
Revenues `
Amount Percent
Water Sales 9,675,426$ 10,180,430$ 18,511,000$ (8,330,570)$ 55% 18,749,524$
Charges For Services 1,768,952 1,818,197 3,457,000 (1,638,803) 53% 3,423,800
Interest Earnings 149,119 215,473 100,000 115,473 215% 400,000
Miscellaneous 29,585 2,037 20,000 (17,964) 10% 21,047
Total Revenues 11,623,082$ 12,216,136$ 22,088,000$ (9,871,864)$ 55% 22,594,370$
Uses
Amount Percent
Personnel 1,637,984$ 1,613,089$ 3,985,725$ 2,372,636$ 40% 3,807,621$
O&M 4,970,216 5,076,445 11,552,175 6,475,730 44% 11,357,287
Capital Outlays 698,456 778,718 2,327,639 1,548,921 33% 2,330,896
Debt Service 3,116,988 3,523,708 3,890,977 367,269 91% 3,890,977
Transfers Out 2,333 2,712,816 9,883,004 7,170,188 27% 9,883,004
Total Uses 10,425,977$ 13,704,776$ 31,639,520$ 17,934,744$ 43% 31,269,785$
Note: Excludes non-cash outlays for depreciation & amortization
Change in Fund Balance
Total Revenues 11,623,082$ 12,216,136$ 22,088,000$ 22,594,370$
Total Uses (10,425,977) (13,704,776) (31,639,520) (31,269,785)
Change in Fund Balance 1,197,105$ (1,488,640)$ (9,551,520)$ (8,675,415)$
Beginning Fund Balance 14,762,151$ 14,762,151$
Estimated Ending Fund Balance 13,273,512$ 6,086,737$
FY 2024/25
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Budget
Year End
Estimate
Year End
Estimate
FY 2024/25
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Budget
Actual Vs. Budget Year End
Estimate
FY 2024/25
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Budget
Actual Vs. Budget
Revenues:
Water sales are trending above budget, primarily driven by higher irrigation and commercial water sales. Charges for services are expected to fall below budget
projections due to fewer late fees than anticipated. Interest earnings are surpassing budget estimates as a result of interest generated from invested bond and
loan proceeds, with the year-end forecast increased to $400,000. Miscellaneous revenues are projected to exceed budget expectations due to insurance
recoveries.
Uses:
Personnel: Expenditures are trending below budget due to vacancies in several positions, including two Water Utility Operators, a Water Operations Supervisor,
and a Water Control Systems Supervisor.
Operations & Maintenance: Projected savings in CAP water deliver charges and gasoline.
Debt Service: The full annual principal payment is recorded at the beginning of the fiscal year, while interest payments occur semiannually in January and June. A
detailed schedule of outstanding debt issuances is provided in Appendix 6.
Transfers Out: Transfers are primarily to the Water Resource Impact Fee Fund to support NWRRDS capital projects and represent 40% of groundwater
preservation fee revenues. This transfer is recorded at year-end and may vary based on actual revenue collections. A smaller transfer of $3,004 was made to the
Debt Service Fund for debt repayment.
Page 13 of 14
Stormwater Utility Fund
Financial Status Fiscal Year to Date: December 2025
Revenues `
Amount Percent
Charges For Services 764,014$ 769,402$ 1,527,000$ (757,598)$ 50% 1,543,429$
Grants - - 239,200 (239,200) - -
Interest Earnings 21,476 23,418 20,000 3,418 117% 48,000
Total Revenues 785,489$ 792,820$ 1,786,200$ (993,380)$ 44% 1,591,429$
Expenses
Amount Percent
Personnel 445,606$ 423,279$ 990,258$ 566,979$ 43% 964,105$
O&M 150,039 166,250 444,755 278,505 37% 385,661
Capital Outlays - - 718,000 718,000 - 50,000
Total Expenses 595,646$ 589,529$ 2,153,013$ 1,563,484$ 27% 1,399,766$
Note: Excludes non-cash outlays for depreciation
Change in Fund Balance
Total Revenues 785,489$ 792,820$ 1,786,200$ 1,591,429$
Total Expenses (595,646) (589,529) (2,153,013) (1,399,766)
Change in Fund Balance 189,844$ 203,291$ (366,813)$ 191,662$
Beginning Fund Balance 1,447,723$ 1,447,723$
Estimated Ending Fund Balance 1,651,014$ 1,639,386$
FY 2024/25
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Budget
Year End
Estimate
Year End
Estimate
FY 2024/25
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Budget
Actual Vs. Budget Year End
Estimate
FY 2024/25
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Budget
Actual Vs. Budget
Revenues:
Charges for service are trending slightly higher than budget (1.1%). Budgeted grant revenue consists of a federal grant supporting the Sierra Wash at Glover
Road Infrastructure Repair and Rehabilitation capital project which will likely not be received until next fiscal year.
Expenses:
Personnel: Savings are expected due to the Senior Engineering Associate position being vacant for 1.5 months and filled at a lower rate than budgeted.
Operations & Maintenance: Savings are anticipated in outside professional service, gasoline and vehicle repair and maintenance.
Capital Outlays: Budgeted capital expenditures include general infrastructure maintenance and three major capital improvement projects:
- Sierra Wash at Glover Road Infrastructure Repair and Rehabilitation ($318,000)
- Sierra Wash at Via Mandarina Drainage Improvements ($50,000)
- Oro Valley Drive Drainage and Pavement Improvements ($300,000)
The Oro Valley Drive Drainage and Pavement Improvements project ($300,000) was taken over by Pima County and has been removed from the year-end
estimate. Sierra Wash at Glover Road will likely be delayed into FY27 awaiting a grant.
Page 14 of 14
APPENDIX 1
El Conquistador Golf Mgmt.,
LLC Report Date: 12/31/2025
El Conquistador Golf Course
Dec - 2025 Budget Dec - 2024 Bud Var PY Var Dec - 2025 Budget Dec - 2024 Bud Var PY Var
Rounds
Public 6,034 5,200 5,882 834 152 23,726 19,750 22,176 3,976 1,550
Member 4,318 4,125 4,317 193 1 21,494 20,865 21,410 629 84
Tournament 131 575 648 (444) (517) 2,120 3,555 3,804 (1,435) (1,684)
Total Rounds 10,483 9,900 10,847 583 (364)47,340 44,170 47,390 3,170 (50)
Membership Fees 173,550.14 146,000.00 157,946.76 27,550.14 15,603.38 950,091.41 785,000.00 838,131.48 165,091.41 111,959.93
Total Membership Revenue 173,550.14 146,000.00 157,946.76 27,550.14 15,603.38 950,091.41 785,000.00 838,131.48 165,091.41 111,959.93
Sales - Green Fees 263,262.87 197,500.00 236,223.80 65,762.87 27,039.07 964,499.29 744,750.00 836,114.69 219,749.29 128,384.60
Sales - Tournament 2,874.60 22,000.00 30,692.16 (19,125.40) (27,817.56)80,123.54 138,000.00 152,798.58 (57,876.46) (72,675.04)
Sales - Member Rounds 882.00 350.00 361.97 532.00 520.03 3,718.00 1,600.00 1,709.96 2,118.00 2,008.04
Lessons & Clinics 1,525.00 1,500.00 1,840.00 25.00 (315.00)7,090.92 13,000.00 11,515.00 (5,909.08) (4,424.08)
Range, Rental & Other Golf Related 7,205.51 7,600.00 13,534.64 (394.49) (6,329.13)63,943.11 42,075.00 61,348.59 21,868.11 2,594.52
Cart Fees 38,451.94 32,350.00 36,780.17 6,101.94 1,671.77 204,019.79 166,000.00 184,673.31 38,019.79 19,346.48
Golf Fees Revenue 314,201.92 261,300.00 319,432.74 52,901.92 (5,230.82)1,323,394.65 1,105,425.00 1,248,160.13 217,969.65 75,234.52
Sales - Soft Goods 21,847.96 23,385.00 21,320.10 (1,537.04)527.86 65,500.55 74,160.00 79,341.10 (8,659.45) (13,840.55)
Sales - Hard Goods 19,238.30 12,550.00 14,523.25 6,688.30 4,715.05 67,261.29 50,800.00 56,938.14 16,461.29 10,323.15
Merchandise Revenue 41,086.26 35,935.00 35,843.35 5,151.26 5,242.91 132,761.84 124,960.00 136,279.24 7,801.84 (3,517.40)
Other Revenue 6,614.36 500.00 9,999.26 6,114.36 (3,384.90)12,233.38 14,000.00 3,417.58 (1,766.62)8,815.80
Other Revenue 6,614.36 500.00 9,999.26 6,114.36 (3,384.90)12,233.38 14,000.00 3,417.58 (1,766.62)8,815.80
Sales - Food 36,198.25 775.00 41,991.78 35,423.25 (5,793.53)196,144.17 2,250.00 191,720.84 193,894.17 4,423.33
Sales - Beer 21,544.20 2,000.00 26,235.72 19,544.20 (4,691.52)120,199.00 6,350.00 119,500.92 113,849.00 698.08
Sales - Wine 3,111.54 0.00 2,705.90 3,111.54 405.64 12,770.42 0.00 9,279.72 12,770.42 3,490.70
Sales - Liquor 8,049.46 100.00 10,471.50 7,949.46 (2,422.04)46,369.99 525.00 44,044.66 45,844.99 2,325.33
Group Service Charges 0.00 0.00 4,453.89 0.00 (4,453.89)55,758.89 0.00 12,952.40 55,758.89 42,806.49
Food & Beverage Revenue 68,903.45 2,875.00 85,858.79 66,028.45 (16,955.34)431,242.47 9,125.00 377,498.54 422,117.47 53,743.93
TOTAL REVENUE 604,356.13 446,610.00 609,080.90 157,746.13 (4,724.77)2,849,723.75 2,038,510.00 2,603,486.97 811,213.75 246,236.78
Expenses
COS - Merchandise 36,462.11 25,639.25 27,115.31 (10,822.86) (9,346.80)96,538.73 88,640.00 97,705.61 (7,898.73)1,166.88
COS - Food 12,413.59 232.50 14,652.78 (12,181.09)2,239.19 77,842.71 675.00 70,601.27 (77,167.71) (7,241.44)
COS - Beer 7,173.94 600.00 7,483.85 (6,573.94)309.91 36,479.76 1,905.00 34,809.11 (34,574.76) (1,670.65)
COS - Wine 1,128.43 0.00 795.45 (1,128.43) (332.98)3,901.11 0.00 2,870.98 (3,901.11) (1,030.13)
COS - Liquor 1,662.41 30.00 2,269.32 (1,632.41)606.91 12,841.74 157.50 11,231.54 (12,684.24) (1,610.20)
Cost of Sales 58,840.48 26,501.75 52,316.71 (32,338.73) (6,523.77)227,604.05 91,377.50 217,218.51 (136,226.55) (10,385.54)
Gross Margin 545,515.65 420,108.25 556,764.19 125,407.40 (11,248.54)2,622,119.70 1,947,132.50 2,386,268.46 674,987.20 235,851.24
Month-to-Date Year-to-Date
APPENDIX 1
Page 1 of 3
APPENDIX 1
El Conquistador Golf Mgmt.,
LLC Report Date: 12/31/2025
El Conquistador Golf Course
Dec - 2025 Budget Dec - 2024 Bud Var PY Var Dec - 2025 Budget Dec - 2024 Bud Var PY Var
Month-to-Date Year-to-Date
Salaries & Wages 165,951.70 151,789.00 178,988.84 (14,162.70)13,037.14 1,026,985.52 796,184.00 979,321.62 (230,801.52) (47,663.90)
Payroll Taxes 15,088.13 13,100.00 15,813.29 (1,988.13)725.16 75,431.73 63,650.00 77,873.09 (11,781.73)2,441.36
Workers Comp 3,537.80 2,500.00 3,077.10 (1,037.80) (460.70)22,900.98 15,000.00 17,269.22 (7,900.98) (5,631.76)
Employee Benefits 14,111.31 15,000.00 11,671.90 888.69 (2,439.41)62,476.56 65,500.00 66,425.68 3,023.44 3,949.12
Other Employee Benefits 2,414.57 1,300.00 1,444.26 (1,114.57) (970.31)18,322.36 7,800.00 8,661.47 (10,522.36) (9,660.89)
Total Payroll & Benefits 201,103.51 183,689.00 210,995.39 (17,414.51)9,891.88 1,206,117.15 948,134.00 1,149,551.08 (257,983.15) (56,566.07)
Meals & Entertainment 708.93 475.00 721.73 (233.93)12.80 2,869.57 3,275.00 4,654.97 405.43 1,785.40
Travel 0.00 225.00 248.24 225.00 248.24 3,697.10 2,550.00 2,930.11 (1,147.10) (766.99)
Other Employee Related 521.34 0.00 769.89 (521.34)248.55 521.34 0.00 769.89 (521.34)248.55
Total Employee Related 1,230.27 700.00 1,739.86 (530.27)509.59 7,088.01 5,825.00 8,354.97 (1,263.01)1,266.96
R&M - Equipment 14,464.24 7,300.00 6,014.07 (7,164.24) (8,450.17)94,782.86 87,300.00 82,779.08 (7,482.86) (12,003.78)
R&M - Building 1,120.67 0.00 0.00 (1,120.67) (1,120.67)5,155.58 15,500.00 9,975.22 10,344.42 4,819.64
R&M - Golf Course & Tennis Courts 1,010.93 4,000.00 4,220.09 2,989.07 3,209.16 13,032.57 22,000.00 26,246.20 8,967.43 13,213.63
R&M - Other 413.07 400.00 0.00 (13.07) (413.07)2,478.42 2,400.00 1,604.16 (78.42) (874.26)
Sod 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,000.00 1,067.72 1,000.00 1,067.72
Sand & Gravel 3,116.16 2,000.00 0.00 (1,116.16) (3,116.16)14,989.71 13,500.00 14,899.07 (1,489.71) (90.64)
Seed & Mulch 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 116,507.48 145,000.00 125,697.74 28,492.52 9,190.26
Gas, Diesel, Oil & Lubricants 5,180.72 4,450.00 0.00 (730.72) (5,180.72)24,514.57 26,700.00 20,037.03 2,185.43 (4,477.54)
Fertilizers 5,081.69 6,500.00 4,767.07 1,418.31 (314.62)30,053.56 49,000.00 27,668.52 18,946.44 (2,385.04)
Chemicals 11,070.57 4,700.00 4,331.10 (6,370.57) (6,739.47)64,751.12 41,150.00 27,035.06 (23,601.12) (37,716.06)
Total Repairs & Maintenance 41,458.05 29,350.00 19,332.33 (12,108.05) (22,125.72)366,265.87 403,550.00 337,009.80 37,284.13 (29,256.07)
Marketing & Advertising 930.50 1,120.00 1,403.42 189.50 472.92 6,026.13 7,570.00 11,166.18 1,543.87 5,140.05
Computer Related 2,140.42 0.00 0.00 (2,140.42) (2,140.42)10,259.92 0.00 0.00 (10,259.92) (10,259.92)
Dues & Subscriptions 3,070.68 3,870.00 3,240.62 799.32 169.94 24,323.55 23,220.00 19,788.61 (1,103.55) (4,534.94)
Operating Supplies 6,214.13 7,300.00 8,711.09 1,085.87 2,496.96 60,887.66 47,575.00 67,452.59 (13,312.66)6,564.93
Linens & Laundry 786.12 0.00 768.45 (786.12) (17.67)4,648.23 0.00 5,144.57 (4,648.23)496.34
Postage 0.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 0.00 272.56 225.00 287.66 (47.56)15.10
Member Relations (213.39)0.00 2,915.79 213.39 3,129.18 880.68 1,000.00 5,629.69 119.32 4,749.01
Uniforms 1,286.57 3,000.00 1,216.17 1,713.43 (70.40)3,917.94 6,175.00 5,701.09 2,257.06 1,783.15
Other Operating 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,182.00 0.00 1,182.00
Merchant Processing Fees 9,463.68 8,900.00 10,205.69 (563.68)742.01 38,263.55 31,000.00 32,872.22 (7,263.55) (5,391.33)
Bank Fees 0.00 0.00 1,004.56 0.00 1,004.56 (31.83)0.00 1,004.56 31.83 1,036.39
Cash Short / (Over) 372.97 0.00 0.00 (372.97) (372.97)419.99 0.00 0.00 (419.99) (419.99)
Centralized Services 2,528.32 2,125.00 2,369.62 (403.32) (158.70)13,832.49 12,750.00 13,007.62 (1,082.49) (824.87)
Tournament Expenses 0.00 0.00 969.15 0.00 969.15 0.00 0.00 969.15 0.00 969.15
Total Operating Expenses 26,580.00 26,390.00 32,804.56 (190.00)6,224.56 163,700.87 129,515.00 164,205.94 (34,185.87)505.07
Operating Profit 275,143.82 179,979.25 291,892.05 95,164.57 (16,748.23)878,947.80 460,108.50 727,146.67 418,839.30 151,801.13
APPENDIX 1
Page 2 of 3
APPENDIX 1
El Conquistador Golf Mgmt.,
LLC Report Date: 12/31/2025
El Conquistador Golf Course
Dec - 2025 Budget Dec - 2024 Bud Var PY Var Dec - 2025 Budget Dec - 2024 Bud Var PY Var
Month-to-Date Year-to-Date
Electric & Gas 20,193.87 23,000.00 19,736.67 2,806.13 (457.20)142,986.70 160,500.00 149,082.68 17,513.30 6,095.98
Water 74,188.91 55,450.00 55,543.78 (18,738.91) (18,645.13)566,998.23 634,950.00 623,457.15 67,951.77 56,458.92
Telephone & Internet Connection 645.98 875.00 1,142.69 229.02 496.71 4,252.78 5,250.00 4,495.07 997.22 242.29
Other Third-party Services 4,013.34 3,325.00 3,375.67 (688.34) (637.67)23,473.74 32,000.00 33,561.95 8,526.26 10,088.21
Total Utilities 99,042.10 82,650.00 79,798.81 (16,392.10) (19,243.29)737,711.45 832,700.00 810,596.85 94,988.55 72,885.40
Lease Expense - Fixed 15,077.76 14,582.00 13,258.76 (495.76) (1,819.00)90,466.56 87,492.00 79,552.56 (2,974.56) (10,914.00)
Lease Expense - Short-term & Other 298.11 298.00 298.11 (0.11)0.00 1,788.66 2,338.00 2,361.51 549.34 572.85
Total Leases 15,375.87 14,880.00 13,556.87 (495.87) (1,819.00)92,255.22 89,830.00 81,914.07 (2,425.22) (10,341.15)
Fixed Operating Expenses 114,417.97 97,530.00 93,355.68 (16,887.97) (21,062.29)829,966.67 922,530.00 892,510.92 92,563.33 62,544.25
Gross Operating Profit 160,725.85 82,449.25 198,536.37 78,276.60 (37,810.52)48,981.13 (462,421.50) (165,364.25)511,402.63 214,345.38
Insurance 7,546.50 6,000.00 5,877.20 (1,546.50) (1,669.30)45,279.01 36,000.00 36,144.61 (9,279.01) (9,134.40)
Bad Debt Expense 236.61 400.00 2,915.80 163.39 2,679.19 642.12 1,200.00 4,536.55 557.88 3,894.43
Fees, Permits, & Licenses 907.38 1,550.00 240.00 642.62 (667.38)4,347.74 5,225.00 4,356.46 877.26 8.72
Base Management Fees 11,040.81 11,094.00 10,824.32 53.19 (216.49)66,461.35 66,564.00 64,945.92 102.65 (1,515.43)
Other Expenses 19,731.30 19,044.00 19,857.32 (687.30)126.02 116,730.22 108,989.00 109,983.54 (7,741.22) (6,746.68)
Net Operating Income 140,994.55 63,405.25 178,679.05 77,589.30 (37,684.50) (67,749.09) (571,410.50) (275,347.79)503,661.41 207,598.70
Incentive Management Fee 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,030.62 0.00 8,030.62
NET INCOME 140,994.55 63,405.25 178,679.05 77,589.30 (37,684.50) (67,749.09) (571,410.50) (283,378.41)503,661.41 215,629.32
EBITDA 140,994.55 63,405.25 178,679.05 77,589.30 (37,684.50) (67,749.09) (571,410.50) (283,378.41)503,661.41 215,629.32
APPENDIX 1
Page 3 of 3
APPENDIX 2
Operating:Through Dec Budget Cumulative
FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY 2026 Actuals
Revenue
36 Hole 500,158 1,883,452 1,798,304 2,171,484 2,367,136 2,593,395 3,522,083 3,674,489 3,856,880 4,724,718 4,933,178 2,284,032 4,311,050 34,309,309
Pusch Ridge - 105,370 99,134 59,726 106,184 98,316 - 380,375 414,225 528,346 619,276 209,831 528,628 2,620,783
F&B - Overlook - 606,171 708,594 745,766 671,582 554,336 448,782 671,479 725,222 766,679 865,944 355,861 785,400 7,120,416
Total Revenue 500,158 2,594,993 2,606,032 2,976,976 3,144,902 3,246,047 3,970,865 4,726,343 4,996,327 6,019,743 6,418,398 2,849,724 5,625,078 44,050,507
Expenses
36 Hole 1,112,252 3,588,714 3,936,889 3,817,932 3,771,706 3,891,341 3,915,216 3,740,982 3,929,757 4,263,007 4,365,456 2,308,014 4,468,886 42,641,265
Pusch Ridge - 253,513 256,769 236,160 230,196 287,112 - 319,702 390,959 478,320 516,762 238,575 508,480 3,208,069
F&B - Overlook - 861,740 823,383 841,866 785,499 701,538 440,382 630,509 596,910 684,037 756,376 370,884 751,271 7,493,123
Total Expenses 1,112,252 4,703,967 5,017,041 4,895,958 4,787,401 4,879,991 4,355,598 4,691,193 4,917,626 5,425,364 5,638,594 2,917,473 5,728,637 53,342,457
Profit/(Loss)
36 Hole (612,094) (1,705,262) (2,138,585) (1,646,448) (1,404,570) (1,297,946) (393,133) (66,493) (72,877) 461,711 567,722 (23,982) (157,836) (8,331,957)
Pusch Ridge - (148,143) (157,635) (176,434) (124,012) (188,796) - 60,673 23,266 50,026 102,514 (28,745) 20,148 (587,286)
F&B - Overlook - (255,569) (114,789) (96,100) (113,917) (147,202) 8,400 40,970 128,312 82,642 109,569 (15,023) 34,129 (372,707)
Total Operating
Profit/(Loss)(612,094) (2,108,974) (2,411,009) (1,918,982) (1,642,499) (1,633,944) (384,733) 35,150 78,701 594,379 779,804 (67,749) (103,559) (9,291,950)
Capital Investments 45,116 47,909 29,464 - - 131,035 2,828,061 4,619,904 2,184,848 743,897 119,998 630,000 10,750,233
Initial purchase (1)300,000 350,000 350,000 1,000,000
Notes: (1) $1,000,000 original purchase of courses and community center
1/2 cent sales tax 506,710 2,030,750 2,199,466 2,330,941 2,463,034 2,584,916 2,947,420 3,535,507 3,707,578 3,792,744 3,904,926 593,099 - 30,597,091
HOA contributions - - - - - - 125,000 159,050 159,050 159,050 159,050 - 34,050 761,200
POST AGREEMENTPRE AGREEMENT
Town of Oro Valley
Golf Analysis
APPENDIX 2
Page 1 of 2
APPENDIX 2
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
FY 2024
Gross Margin 213,698 225,040 295,419 332,783 495,412 480,305 525,109 589,339 694,275 586,473 430,577 294,092
Expenses 406,558 333,614 420,523 454,504 412,959 349,298 308,213 291,616 334,623 326,900 398,960 530,376
Net Income/(Loss) (192,860) (108,573) (125,103) (121,721) 82,453 131,007 216,896 297,723 359,652 259,573 31,617 (236,284)
FY 2025
Gross Margin 263,005 299,163 297,857 375,363 594,117 556,764 534,838 706,996 737,685 675,958 450,287 378,899
Expenses 411,466 416,806 442,887 488,946 531,458 378,085 374,611 318,371 420,446 381,953 453,967 476,826
Net Income/(Loss) (148,461) (117,643) (145,030) (113,583) 62,659 178,679 160,226 388,625 317,239 294,005 (3,681) (97,927)
FY 2026
Gross Margin 337,860 344,855 377,531 402,476 613,880 545,516
Expenses 416,385 419,190 518,351 474,811 456,611 404,521
Net Income/(Loss) (78,525) (74,335) (140,820) (72,334) 157,270 140,995 - - - - - -
Town of Oro Valley
Golf Analysis - Contractor Financials
-
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Comparison of Gross Income by Month - Total Golf Operations
FY 2024
FY 2025
FY 2026
-
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Comparison of Total Expenses by Month - Total Golf Operations
FY 2024
FY 2025
FY 2026
(400,000)
(200,000)
-
200,000
400,000
600,000
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Comparison of Net Income/(Loss) by Month - Total Golf Operations
FY 2024
FY 2025
FY 2026
APPENDIX 2
Page 2 of 2
APPENDIX 3
Consolidated Year-to-Date Financial Report through December 2025 FY 2025/2026
Fund
FY 25/26
Beginning
Fund Balance Revenue
Other Fin
Sources/
Transfers In Total In Personnel O&M Capital
Debt
Service
Other Fin
Uses/
Transfers Out Total Out
Fund Balance
Through
December 2025
General Fund 20,702,401 27,364,715 - 27,364,715 17,121,828 7,028,157 84,559 - 8,203,829 32,438,373 15,628,744
Highway Fund 1,598,787 2,179,496 1,000,000 3,179,496 622,424 524,357 1,371,850 - - 2,518,631 2,259,652
Grants and Contributions Fund 60,787 369,306 59,109 428,415 406 93,971 312,426 - - 406,803 82,399
Seizure & Forfeiture - Justice/State 374,906 7,733 - 7,733 - - - - - - 382,639
Community Center Fund 2,921,900 4,153,014 - 4,153,014 586,287 3,468,361 368,388 - 172,968 4,596,005 2,478,908
Municipal Debt Service Fund 53,800 110,149 3,918,566 4,028,715 - 8,413 - 3,428,051 - 3,436,463 646,051
Water Resource System & Dev. Impact Fee Fund 6,481,181 930,395 2,709,812 3,640,207 - 84,040 6,931,946 557,505 - 7,573,491 2,547,897
Townwide Roadway Dev Impact Fee Fund 3,095,031 487,955 - 487,955 - - - - - - 3,582,986
Parks & Recreation Impact Fee Fund 381,038 311,404 - 311,404 - - - - - - 692,442
Police Impact Fee Fund 122,916 97,978 - 97,978 - - - - 38,765 38,765 182,128
Capital Fund 16,847,866 887,952 4,500,000 5,387,952 - 7,811 5,779,834 - 1,059,109 6,846,754 15,389,064
PAG/RTA Fund 446,926 7,528 - 7,528 - 8,400 70,000 - - 78,400 376,055
Water Utility 14,762,151 12,216,136 - 12,216,136 1,613,089 5,076,445 778,718 3,523,708 2,712,816 13,704,776 13,273,512
Stormwater Utility 1,447,723 792,820 - 792,820 423,279 166,250 - - - 589,529 1,651,014
Benefit Self Insurance Fund 3,995,323 2,056,035 - 2,056,035 - 2,482,610 - - - 2,482,610 3,568,748
Recreation In-Lieu Fee Fund 52,018 764 - 764 - - - - - - 52,781
Total 73,344,754 51,973,380 12,187,487 64,160,867 20,367,314 18,948,815 15,697,721 7,509,264 12,187,487 74,710,600 62,795,020
APPENDIX 4
Local Sales Tax Collections
FY 2025/26 JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN TOTAL
Construction Sales Tax 179,150 163,435 98,998 89,454 243,032 156,790 930,859
Utility Sales Tax 302,786 412,779 407,129 429,423 372,182 261,920 2,186,218
Retail Sales Tax 941,576 897,606 867,961 893,562 934,258 1,001,735 5,536,699
Remote Seller Sales Tax 192,279 205,970 220,208 196,932 221,954 259,550 1,296,892
Bed Tax 112,651 91,706 92,611 115,225 146,552 178,739 737,485
Restaurant & Bar Sales Tax 269,228 238,235 263,782 292,127 270,580 270,346 1,604,297
All Other Local Sales Tax *115,341 108,925 133,051 119,804 136,567 153,290 766,978
Monthly Total 2,113,010$ 2,118,656$ 2,083,741$ 2,136,528$ 2,325,125$ 2,282,369$ 13,059,428$
Cumulative Total 2,113,010$ 4,231,666$ 6,315,407$ 8,451,935$ 10,777,059$ 13,059,428$
Monthly variance (220,775)$ (201,284)$ (240,986)$ (191,015)$ (279,060)$ (262,332)$
Cumulative variance (220,775)$ (422,059)$ (663,045)$ (854,060)$ (1,133,120)$ (1,395,452)$
FY 2024/25 JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN TOTAL
Construction Sales Tax 427,032 291,729 371,199 324,860 545,601 253,973 356,030 414,112 171,326 130,317 296,873 293,764 3,876,815
Utility Sales Tax 306,838 399,701 417,156 405,901 370,322 335,865 288,120 341,375 312,662 259,576 253,922 266,994 3,958,432
Retail Sales Tax 937,920 893,895 855,486 893,023 923,982 1,034,704 1,317,644 978,283 891,361 1,032,305 1,001,099 922,356 11,682,057
Remote Seller Sales Tax 164,541 176,303 174,003 175,191 187,988 229,019 275,105 193,315 178,898 200,958 196,195 199,852 2,351,368
Bed Tax 107,778 180,045 136,688 120,312 177,934 231,333 286,851 209,622 320,232 321,945 252,906 177,851 2,523,496
Restaurant & Bar Sales Tax 271,259 239,294 251,212 286,989 268,563 287,017 374,825 280,614 314,687 382,887 280,512 327,412 3,565,273
All Other Local Sales Tax *118,418 138,973 118,983 121,267 129,793 172,790 208,896 179,929 219,760 224,200 183,278 134,802 1,951,088
Monthly Total 2,333,785$ 2,319,940$ 2,324,727$ 2,327,543$ 2,604,184$ 2,544,700$ 3,107,472$ 2,597,249$ 2,408,926$ 2,552,188$ 2,464,785$ 2,323,029$ 29,908,529$
Cumulative Total 2,333,785$ 4,653,725$ 6,978,452$ 9,305,995$ 11,910,179$ 14,454,879$ 17,562,351$ 20,159,600$ 22,568,526$ 25,120,715$ 27,585,500$ 29,908,529$
*Does not include cable franchise fees or sales tax audit revenues
APPENDIX 5
General Fund State Shared Revenues
FY 2025/26 JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN TOTAL
State Shared Income Tax 793,555 793,555 793,555 793,555 793,555 793,556 4,761,332
State Shared Sales Tax 619,095 603,827 595,627 602,207 623,385 588,988 3,633,129
County Auto Lieu 216,240 215,390 219,757 235,357 160,740 250,037 1,297,522
Smart and Safe - - - - - 131,143 131,143
Monthly Total 1,628,891$ 1,612,772$ 1,608,939$ 1,631,119$ 1,577,680$ 1,763,724$ 9,823,125$
Cumulative Total 1,628,891$ 3,241,663$ 4,850,602$ 6,481,721$ 8,059,402$ 9,823,125$
Monthly variance (59,126)$ (41,479)$ (26,784)$ (47,715)$ (82,925)$ (36,755)$
Cumulative variance (59,126)$ (100,605)$ (127,389)$ (175,104)$ (258,029)$ (294,783)$
FY 2024/25 JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN TOTAL
State Shared Income Tax 856,425 856,425 856,425 856,425 856,425 856,425 856,425 856,425 856,425 856,425 856,425 856,425 10,277,099
State Shared Sales Tax 593,796 582,212 575,094 597,416 614,349 622,937 724,079 596,353 582,965 677,435 632,153 618,346 7,417,134
County Auto Lieu 237,795 215,615 204,204 224,993 189,831 182,939 128,184 304,691 257,209 119,394 230,779 325,869 2,621,504
Smart and Safe - - - - - 138,177 - - 15 - - 148,981 287,173
Monthly Total 1,688,016$ 1,654,252$ 1,635,723$ 1,678,834$ 1,660,605$ 1,800,479$ 1,708,688$ 1,757,469$ 1,696,614$ 1,653,254$ 1,719,357$ 1,949,620$ 20,602,911$
Cumulative Total 1,688,016$ 3,342,268$ 4,977,991$ 6,656,825$ 8,317,430$ 10,117,909$ 11,826,596$ 13,584,065$ 15,280,679$ 16,933,933$ 18,653,291$ 20,602,911$
APPENDIX 6
Debt Service Expense
Adopted Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Final Payment
2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030-2035 2036-2040 2041-2045
Date
Municipal Debt Service Fund
Excise Tax Revenue Bonds - - -
2010 CREBS 186,370 176,066 170,437 - - - - - 2028
2012 Revenue Bonds 224,631 227,147 224,125 - - - - - 2028
2015a Refunding Excise Tax 304,379 - - - - - - - 2026
2016 Excise Tax 172,968 172,635 172,236 172,760 172,207 344,447 - - 2032
2017a Refunding Excise Tax 138,645 138,626 - - - - - - 2027
2018a Excise Tax Revenue Obligation 171,515 171,446 171,502 171,429 171,229 684,420 - - 2034
2021 Parks & Rec Excise Tax 1,543,300 1,544,800 1,539,425 1,542,050 1,537,550 7,693,950 7,682,400 3,063,900 2042
2021 Pension Obligation Bonds 1,271,262 1,266,350 1,264,118 1,264,461 1,262,588 6,312,780 5,036,273 - 2039
Total Municipal Debt Service Fund 4,013,070 3,697,070 3,541,843 3,150,700 3,143,574 15,035,597 12,718,673 3,063,900
Community Center Fund
Contracts Payable
Leased Fitness Equipment 7,668 - - - - - - - 2026
Financed Fitness Equipment 22,677 7,559 - - - - - - 2027
Golf Carts 130,867 76,339 - - - - - - 2027
Leased Copiers 76,800 76,800 12,800 - - - - - 2028
Total Community Center Fund 238,012 160,698 12,800 - - - - -
WRSDIF Fund
Excise Tax Revenue Bonds
2021b Excise Tax Revenue Obligation (4) 55,924 56,015 55,596 34,453 8,255 - - - 2030
2025b Senior Lien Water Revenue Obligation (5) 455,408 455,411 455,408 455,409 455,410 2,277,041 - - 2035
2025b WIFA Loan (6) 493,700 468,639 468,639 468,639 468,639 2,343,196 2,343,196 2,343,196 2045
Total WSRDIF Fund 1,005,032 980,065 979,643 958,501 932,304 4,620,237 2,343,196 2,343,196
Water Utility Fund
Excise Tax Revenue Bonds
2015b Refunding Revenue Bonds (1) 148,500 - - - - - - 2026
2017b Refunding Revenue Bonds (2) 1,619,650 1,619,032 - - - - - - 2027
2018b Excise Tax Revenue Obligation (3) 508,532 508,144 508,118 507,710 506,914 2,024,062 - - 2034
2021a Excise Tax Revenue Obligations (4) 743,499 744,714 739,138 458,046 109,745 - - - 2030
2025a Senior Lien Water Revenue Obligation (5) 303,605 303,607 303,605 303,606 303,607 1,518,027 - - 2035
Water Revenue Loans
2014 WIFA Loan 371,750 371,509 371,261 371,006 - - - - 2029
2025a WIFA Loan (6) 329,134 312,426 312,426 312,426 312,426 1,562,131 1,562,131 1,562,131 2045
Total Water Utility Fund 4,024,671 3,859,432 2,234,549 1,952,794 1,232,692 5,104,220 1,562,131 1,562,131
TOTAL DEBT SERVICE - ALL FUNDS 9,280,785 8,697,265 6,768,834 6,061,995 5,308,571 24,760,053 16,624,000 6,969,227
(5) Series 2025 debt service is split between the Water Utility Fund (40%) and the Water Impact fee Fund (60%).
(6) 2025 WIFA loan debt service is split between the Water Utility Fund (40%) and the Water Impact fee Fund (60%).
(1) Series 2015 for municipal operation facilities debt service is split between General Fund excise tax revenue (67%) and water revenue (33%).
(2) Series 2017 debt service is split between General Fund excise tax revenue (8%) and water revenue (92%).
(3) Series 2018 for water infrastucture and police evidence and substation facility. Debt service is split between General Fund excise tax revenue (25%) and water revenue (75%).
(4) Series 2021 debt service is split between the Water Utility Fund (93%) and the Water Impact fee Fund (7%).
APPENDIX 7
Town of Oro Valley
Operating Investment Summary
Fiscal Year 2025/26
JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN
LGIP
Ending Market Value 11,048,264$ 10,564,199$ 9,802,412$ 8,759,464$ 10,446,793$ 10,759,658$
Investment Income 34,213$ 41,256$ 34,954$ 31,477$ 35,518$ 33,762$
1-Month Yield 4.33% 4.32% 4.18% 4.09% 3.97% 3.81%
PFM Asset Management
Closing Market Value 39,752,553$ 38,301,783$ 37,918,398$ 37,062,569$ 35,042,894$ 34,056,344$
Investment Income 199,738$ 172,343$ 102,243$ 130,423$ 207,951$ 80,876$
Annualized Yield to
Maturity at Cost 4.51% 4.54% 4.53% 4.53% 4.54% 4.53%
Wells Fargo Sweep
Ending Balance 3,413,781$ 6,187,767$ 2,581,008$ 4,856,250$ 4,081,463$ 3,859,896$
Investment Income 13,910$ 10,451$ 15,825$ 13,151$ 10,020$ 9,793$
7-Day Simple Yield 4.18% 4.18% 4.01% 4.00% 3.84% 3.65%
Total Ending Balance 54,214,597$ 55,053,750$ 50,301,818$ 50,678,283$ 49,571,151$ 48,675,898$
Total Investment Income 247,861$ 224,050$ 153,022$ 175,052$ 253,489$ 124,431$
APPENDIX 8
Town of Oro Valley - Development Impact Fee Fund Projects
Parks and Recreation Facilities
Description Cost Completed?
Skate Park $1,500,000 Yes
Playground and Parking Lot $1,700,000 Yes
Multiuse Fields (lighted) $1,200,000 Yes
Dog Park $150,000 Yes
Developed Park Land $927,694
Park Amenities $2,501,696
Police
Police Substation Debt $1,198,500
Police Vehicles $846,050
Street Facilities
La Cholla Blvd, Tangerine Rd-Lambert Ln - Road Widening $1,700,000 Yes
Shannon Rd, Tangerine Rd-Naranja Dr - New Road $1,000,000
Lambert Ln. .5 mi E of Shannon-Rancho Sonora - Road Widening $1,000,000
Rancho Vistoso & Woodburne - Intersection Improvement $750,000
Oracle Rd & Rams Field Intersection - Intersection Improvement $750,000
Moore Rd La Cholla Blvd - Intersection Improvement $900,000
Moore Rd - Extension E of Rancho Vistoso Blvd - New Road & Intersection $1,026,840 Yes
Moore Rd & La Canada Dr Intersection - Intersection Improvement $1,200,000 Yes
Glover Rd Multi Use Path - Multi-modal facility $150,000 Yes
Glover Rd south half widening - Road Widening $500,000 Yes
Water Facilities
Water Supply
Steam Pump D-Zone Well $1,500,000
Program Management Support Services (P) $1,050,000 Yes
Well Improvement Analysis and Recovery Permits (P) $150,000 Yes
Well Drilling and Testing (P) $300,000 Yes
Construction Permitting, Drilling, Development and Testing (P) $1,500,000 Yes
Well Equipment Design and Site Improvements (P) $1,800,000 Yes
Storage
Palisades C-Zone Storage Tank and Pipeline $4,250,000
Pressure Zone G Storage Expansion $8,000,000
Pressure Zone G, H and I Storage Expansion $4,000,000
Forebay Design (P)$99,231 Yes
Forebay Reservoir Construction (P) $900,000 Yes
Shannon Rd Forebay Reservoir And Booster Station Prop (Ind.) $240,000 Yes
Forebay Reservoir Booster Station Design (Ind.) $90,000 Yes
Shannon Rd Forebay Reservoir and Booster Station Design (Ind.) $180,000 Yes
Booster Station Construction Forebay Res. (Ind.) $300,000 Yes
Shannon Road Forebay Res. Construction (Ind.) $840,000 Yes
Shannon Road Forebay Res. Construction (Ind.) $540,000 Yes
Arizona municipalities can charge development fees to cover the cost of infrastructure improvements needed to support new
development. These fees are one-time payments used to fund projects like building new roads, parks, or water facilities. The amount of
the fee is determined by an Infrastructure Improvements Plan (IIP) and land use assumptions. Importantly, development fees can only
be used for building new infrastructure or paying off debt for growth-related projects. They cannot be used for ongoing maintenance,
repairs, or addressing existing problems. The Town's IIP includes public services for parks and recreation facilities, police facilities,
street facilities, and water facilities.
Below is a list of identified IIP projects use in the latest impact fee study to calculate the development fees. These are projects that
would be eligible to be funded by development fees as outlined in ARS § 9-463.05 (T)(7)(a).
APPENDIX 8
Page 1 of 2
APPENDIX 8
Water Facilities Continued
Description Cost Completed?
Distribution
Moore Road F-Zone Interconnect $750,000
Water Plant 14 Booster Capacity Expansion $250,000
Pipeline Design (Recovery Water & Transmission) (P) $660,692 Yes
Pipeline Construction (P) $4,320,000
Pipeline Route Study and Preliminary Design (Ind.) $120,000 Yes
Pipeline Easement Acquisition (Ind.) $450,000 Yes
Pipeline Design (Ind.) $600,000 Yes
Pipeline Construction NWRRDS to La Canada Res. (Ind.) $5,880,000
Interconnect to Tangerine Rd. (Ind.) $270,000 Yes
Interconnect to Lambert Lane (Ind.) $510,000 Yes
APPENDIX 8
Page 2 of 2
Town Council Regular Session A.
Meeting Date:03/04/2026
Submitted By:Michelle Stine, Town Clerk's Office
Department:Town Clerk's Office
SUBJECT:
Minutes - February 18, 2026
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
N/A
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to approve (approve with the following changes) the February 18, 2026, minutes.
Attachments
2-18-26 Draft Minutes
D R A F T
MINUTES
ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL
REGULAR SESSION
FEBRUARY 18, 2026
ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
11000 N. LA CAÑADA DRIVE
REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Winfield called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Present: Joseph C. Winfield, Mayor
Melanie Barrett, Vice-Mayor
Harry Greene, Councilmember
Mary Murphy, Councilmember
Elizabeth Robb, Councilmember
Absent:Joyce Jones-Ivey, Councilmember
Josh Nicolson, Councilmember
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Winfield led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance.
UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS
Town Clerk Mike Standish announced the upcoming Town meetings and events.
MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS ON CURRENT EVENTS
Councilmember Robb recognized Marwa Saljuqi, a senior at Basis Oro Valley, for her outstanding
academic excellence, work ethic, and perseverance.
Councilmember Robb reminded citizens to participate in the 23rd annual Oro Valley Cup Charity Golf
Tournament, held on Friday, February 20, 2026. Proceeds from the Oro Valley Cup will benefit the
Amphitheater School District Project Graduation events.
Mayor Winfield reported that he had attended the mural unveiling of Twilight Sonoran, at Tohono Chul on
February 14, 2026. Local artist Ignacio Garcia created the mural which depicts the nocturnal Sonoran
Desert in the Garden Pavilion. Mayor Winfield thanked Oro Valley staff and Tohono Chul for their
2/18/26 Minutes, Oro Valley Town Council Regular Session 1
Desert in the Garden Pavilion. Mayor Winfield thanked Oro Valley staff and Tohono Chul for their
partnership which brought this project to fruition.
TOWN MANAGER'S REPORT ON CURRENT EVENTS
Town Manager Jeff Wilkins reported the following:
Information regarding HB2022, which changed the primary election date to July 21, 2026
Information on upcoming Oro Valley events
Vice Mayor Barrett reported that she and Councilmember Murphy had attended the Art State Arizona
Cruise, BBQ and Blues Car Show event where they presented the awards for the event.
ORDER OF BUSINESS
Mayor Winfield reviewed the order of business and stated that the order would stand as posted.
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
There were no informational items.
CALL TO AUDIENCE
Councilmember Nicolson joined the meeting via Zoom at 6:10 p.m.
Ms. Lee Chris voiced her concerns regarding Flock cameras.
Oro Valley resident Scott Hunt voiced his appreciation for the pedestrian bridge at the Pusch Ridge Golf
Course.
Mr. Dan Talsma spoke regarding the Pusch Ridge Golf Course and the certification process with
Audubon International.
Oro Valley resident Sean Glaser voiced his concerns regarding Flock cameras.
Oro Valley resident Diane Hall voiced her concerns regarding short-term rentals in Oro Valley.
Councilmember Nicolson joined the meeting in person at 6:25 p.m.
Mayor Winfield requested that Town Manager Jeff Wilkins provide a report to the Council regarding the
complaints described by Ms. Diane Hall.
Vice Mayor Barrett referred the Oro Valley Police Department to reach out to the two individuals who
spoke earlier regarding the Flock cameras, to engage in further conversation.
PRESENTATIONS
1.Presentation and recognition of Lisa Bayless
Mayor Winfield spoke regarding Mrs. Lisa Bayless and her many contributions to the Town of Oro Valley.
2/18/26 Minutes, Oro Valley Town Council Regular Session 2
Mayor Winfield spoke regarding Mrs. Lisa Bayless and her many contributions to the Town of Oro Valley.
Vice Mayor Barrett spoke regarding Mrs. Bayless and spoke of her presence in the community.
A video honoring Mrs. Bayless was presented.
Councilmember Murphy spoke regarding the contributions of Mrs. Bayless, which included the Arizona
Heroes Memorial and the Rockin 4 Heroes event.
Councilmember Greene spoke regarding Mrs. Bayless and her contributions.
Mrs. Bayless accepted her plaque and voiced her appreciation to the Council, staff, and the Community of
Oro Valley.
2.Recognition of outgoing Board and Commission Members
Mayor Winfield presented a plaque to the following outgoing Oro Valley Board and Commission members
who were in attendance:
David Atler - Water Utility Commission
Charles Stack - Oro Valley Representative to the Pima Association of Governments Environmental
Planning Advisory Committee
Octavio Barcelo - Board of Adjustment
Robert Kellar - Planning and Zoning Commission
Mayor Winfield also recognized the outgoing Oro Valley Board and Commission members who were not
in attendance.
3.Presentation - Golder Ranch Fire District 2025 year in review
Golder Ranch Fire District Fire Chief Tom Brandhuber presented this item and included the following:
Governance & Accountability
History
Motto: Community First
Fiscal Responsibility & Transparency
About Us
North Tucson Firefighters Association Local 3832
Nationally Accredited
Fire Stations in Oro Valley
2025 Response
Emergency Medical Services (EMS)
2025 EMS Impact
Wildland Response
Safety Services
Community Risk Reduction
Results That Matter - Preparing For Tomorrow
Our Commitment to Oro Valley
Serving and Living in Oro Valley
Community Survey
Contact Us
Thank You For Your Support
Discussion ensued among Council, staff, and Fire Chief Brandhuber regarding the Golder Ranch Fire
District 2025 year in review.
2/18/26 Minutes, Oro Valley Town Council Regular Session 3
CONSENT AGENDA
Councilmember Nicolson and Councilmember Murphy requested item #C be removed from the agenda
entirely.
A.Minutes - January 28 and February 4, 2026
B.Resolution No. (R)26-07, approving the Agenda Committee assignment for the period of March 1, 2026 to
May 31, 2026
Motion by Mayor Joseph C. Winfield, seconded by Councilmember Harry Greene to approve Consent
items (A) and (B).
Vote: 6 - 0 Carried
C.Approval to amend the Council Liaison assignments for the Tourism Advisory Commission (TAC) and the
Board of Adjustment (BOA), effective February 19, 2026 through December 31, 2026
This item was removed from the agenda.
REGULAR AGENDA
1.DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING TOWN OF ORO VALLEY ACTIONS THAT COULD
POSSIBLY ATTRACT A COSTCO OR SIMILAR RETAILER
Vice Mayor Barrett explained the reason for requesting this item and provided a brief overview of the
requested item.
Community and Economic Development Director Paul Melcher presented the following:
Presentation Topics
Top 10 Sources of Leakage by Category
Retail Recruitment Focus: Medium and Large-Scale Retail
Medium Box/Auto Sales Retailer Profile
Large Box Retailer/Auto Sale Profile
Recruitment Goal: Create or Assist with 3 Quality Retail Leads
Developer Expectations — Ensuring Confidentiality / Timely Assistance
Specific Recruitment Strategies
General Incentives
Commercial Parcel Inventory
MED/LG Retail Parcel Inventory
Suitable Sites MED/LG Retailers
Recruitment Concept: Pre-Entitlements
Core Strategies
Discussion ensued among Council and staff regarding the Town of Oro Valley actions that could possibly
attract a Costco or similar retailer.
2.DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING INITIATING A PROCESS THAT CAN HELP THE
TOWN IN LOOKING FOR EFFICIENCY OPPORTUNITIES
2/18/26 Minutes, Oro Valley Town Council Regular Session 4
Vice Mayor Barrett explained the reason for requesting this item and provided a brief overview of the
requested item.
Discussion ensued among Council and staff regarding initiating a process that could help the Town in
looking for efficiency opportunities.
Motion by Vice-Mayor Melanie Barrett, seconded by Councilmember Josh Nicolson to have staff identify
all the towns' programs as part of the budget process, to the extent that these programs are grouped,
please identify the items that are grouped and provide simple cost estimates.
Discussion continued among Council and staff regarding item #2.
Vice Mayor Barrett withdrew her motion and Councilmember Nicolson withdrew his second.
Motion by Vice-Mayor Melanie Barrett, seconded by Councilmember Mary Murphy to have staff return to
Council with a scope of work and a timeline according to the discussion tonight.
Vote: 6 - 0 Carried
FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
There were no future agenda items requested.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Mayor Joseph C. Winfield, seconded by Councilmember Mary Murphy to adjourn the meeting
at 8:03 p.m.
Vote: 6 - 0 Carried
___________________________________________________
Michelle Stine, MMC,CPM
Deputy Town Clerk
I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the regular session of the
Town of Oro Valley, Arizona held on the 18th day of February 2026. I further certify that the meeting was called
and held and that a quorum was present.
__________________________________________________
Michael Standish, MMC
Town Clerk
2/18/26 Minutes, Oro Valley Town Council Regular Session 5
Town Council Regular Session 1.
Meeting Date:03/04/2026
Requested by: Peter Abraham Submitted By:Mary Rallis, Water
Department:Water
SUBJECT:
RESOLUTION NO. (R)26-08, PROVIDING NOTICE OF INTENT TO INCREASE THE POTABLE WATER BASE
RATES FOR THE ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY
RECOMMENDATION:
The Water Utility Commission and Water Utility staff respectfully recommend the approval of
Resolution No. (R)26-08, providing notice of intent to increase the potable water base rates for the
Oro Valley Water Utility.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
In accordance with the Town Council Water Policies, Water Utility staff review water rates on an
annual basis. The Water Utility Commission evaluates staff recommendations based on a water rates
analysis to ensure the recommendations meet Town policies and bond covenants. On November 10,
2025, the Commission voted to recommend approval of the water rates identified in the Proposed
Financial Scenario and supported by the 2026 Water Rates Analysis Report.
Pursuant to A.R.S. § 9-511.01, a municipality must adopt a notice of intent to increase water rates at
least 60 days prior to the public hearing. The resolution sets in motion the public process by:
Making the Water Rates Analysis Report available for public review by placing a copy in the
Town Clerk's Office and on the Water Utility's website.
1.
Directing the Town Clerk to publish the resolution in a newspaper of general circulation at least
20 days prior to the public hearing.
2.
Scheduling a public hearing for June 3, 2026, when the Council will consider adoption of the
proposed water rate increases.
3.
Once the notice of intent is approved, the increase in water rates that can be adopted may not exceed
the water rates shown in the 2026 Water Rates Analysis Report.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact associated with adopting a notice of intent to increase water rates.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to (approve or deny) Resolution No. (R)26-08, providing notice of intent to increase the
potable water base rates for the Oro Valley Water Utility.
Attachments
(R)26-08 Notice of Intent to Increase Water Rates
2026 Water Rate Report
Staff Presentation
RESOLUTION NO. (R)26-08
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, PROVIDING NOTICE OF INTENT TO
INCREASE THE POTABLE WATER BASE RATES FOR THE ORO
VALLEY WATER UTILITY; AND DIRECTING THE TOWN
MANAGER, TOWN CLERK, TOWN ATTORNEY, OR THEIR DULY
AUTHORIZED OFFICERS AND AGENTS TO TAKE ALL STEPS
NECESSARY TO CARRY OUT THE PURPOSES AND INTENT OF THIS
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, pursuant to A.R.S. § 9-511, et seq., the Town has the requisite statutory authority
to acquire, own and maintain a water utility for the benefit of the residents within and outside the
Town’s corporate boundaries; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to A.R.S. § 9-511, et seq., the Town finds it necessary to consider
increasing the potable water base rates for the Oro Valley Water Utility; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to A.R.S. § 9-511, et seq., the Town is required to give a Notice of Intent
at a regular Town Council meeting to increase the potable water base rates; and
WHEREAS, the Town has completed a Water Rates Analysis Report, attached hereto as Exhibit
“A”, which supports these water rate increases for the Oro Valley Water Utility; and
WHEREAS, not less than twenty (20) days prior to the public hearing on the proposed rate
increases, the Town shall cause to be published one time in a newspaper of general circulation
within the Town’s boundaries, a Notice of Intent showing the date, time and place of the hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro
Valley, Arizona, as follows:
SECTION 1. This Resolution serves as the Notice of Intent, which is hereby
publicly given, for the Town of Oro Valley to increase the potable water base
rates.
SECTION 2. A public hearing shall be held at the regular meeting of the Mayor
and Council at 6:00 p.m. on June 3, 2026, in the Council Chambers of the Town
Hall, Town of Oro Valley, 11000 North La Cañada Drive, Oro Valley, Arizona, to
deliberate and vote on the proposed increases.
SECTION 3. That Exhibit “A”, attached hereto and incorporated by reference, be
made available to the public in the Office of the Town Clerk and on the Town of
Oro Valley Water Utility website for review prior to the public hearing.
SECTION 4. That the Town Manager, Town Clerk, Town Attorney, or their
duly authorized officers and agents are hereby authorized and directed to take all
steps necessary to carry out the purposes and intent of this resolution.
SECTION 5. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this
Resolution, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision
of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity
of the remaining portions thereof.
SECTION 6. All Oro Valley resolutions or motions and parts of resolutions or
motions of the Council in conflict with the provision of this Resolution are hereby
repealed.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley,
Arizona, this 4th day of March, 2026.
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
Joseph C. Winfield, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Michael Standish, Town Clerk Andrew Votava, Interim Legal Services Director
Date:Date:
EXHIBIT “A”
Potable Water Base Rates: Cost per month
Water
Rates
Analysis
Report
March 2026
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
WATER UTILITY
WATER RATES ANALYSIS REPORT
MARCH 2026
ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL
Joseph Winfield, Mayor
Melanie Barrett, Vice Mayor
Harry “Mo” Green, II, MD, Councilmember
Joyce Jones-Ivey, Councilmember
Mary Murphy, Councilmember
Josh Nicolson, Councilmember
Elizabeth Robb, Councilmember
ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY COMMISSION
Michael Smjekal, Commission Chair
Joseph Hornat, Vice Chair
Rebecca Badruddoja, Commission Member
Alan Forrest, Commission Member
Greg Hitt, Commission Member
Steven Linder, Commission Member
Naranjan Vescio, Commission Member
TOWN STAFF
Peter A. Abraham, P.E., Water Utility Director
Mary E. Rallis, CPA, Water Utility Administrator
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION TITLE PAGE
Index of Appendix
Executive Summary 1
Introduction 3
Methodology 4
Growth Rates 5
Water Use Trends 6
Debt Service 7
Debt Service Coverage Requirements 8
Cash Reserve Policy for Operating Fund 9
Operating Fund
Revenue Forecast 10
Revenue Requirements 12
Water Resource and System Development Impact Fee Fund 14
Proposed Financial Scenario 16
Recommendation on Water Rates 18
Conclusion 20
Appendix
APPENDIX
A. Proposed Financial Scenario Pro Forma
A-1 Operating Fund
A-2 Groundwater Preservation Fee
A-3 Water Resource and System Development Impact Fee Fund
A-4 Summary of all Funds
B. Rate Schedules & Tables for Bill Comparisons
B-1 Proposed Water Rate Schedule
B-2 Tables for Bill Comparisons by Meter Size - Potable
B-8 Tables for Bill Comparisons by Meter Size - Reclaimed
C. 5-Year Capital Improvement Schedules
C-1 Operating Fund
C-2 Groundwater Preservation Fee
C-3 Water Resource and System Development Impact Fee Fund
D. Assumptions for Proposed Financial Scenario
D-1 Operating Fund
D-4 Water Resource and System Development Impact Fee Fund
E. Development Impact Fee Schedule
E-1 Water Resource and System Development Impact Fee Schedule
1
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
WATER UTILITY
WATER RATES ANALYSIS REPORT
MARCH 2026
Executive Summary
An annual review of the revenue requirements and water rates is an integral component in ensuring the long-
term financial health of the Water Utility. The Oro Valley Water Utility Commission reviews and makes
recommendations for water revenue requirements, water rates and fee structures. The Commission evaluates
staff recommendations based on a rates analysis to ensure compliance with Town policies and bond covenants.
Water rates and service charges are reviewed annually in accordance with Mayor and Town Council Water
Policies – II.A.2.b(4).
The Water Utility has based these financial projections on the American Water Works Associations (AWWA)
cash-needs approach. The AWWA is the largest national organization that develops water and wastewater
policies, specifications and rate setting guidelines accepted by both government-owned and private water and
wastewater utilities worldwide.
This Water Rates Analysis Report contains detailed information on the Operating Fund and the Water
Resource and System Development Impact Fee Fund. Funds are analyzed annually to project revenue and
revenue requirements. As an enterprise of the Town, the Water Utility generates revenue from rates, fees and
service charges and does not receive revenue from taxes or other monies from the General Fund. Additionally,
revenue generated by the Water Utility does not fund operating costs of any other Town department.
In accordance with policy, the water rates analysis is prepared annually based on the most up-to-date
information available for a five-year period. Although the analysis is for five years, any rate increase
considered would be approved only for the first year in the five-year projection period.
The Water Utility Commission has made a recommendation regarding the proposed financial scenario. Under
the proposed financial scenario, the Operating Fund is projected to have a cash balance of $7,681,424 at the
end of the five-year projection period. This exceeds the cash reserve requirement. In addition, the debt service
coverage ratio of 1.3 is exceeded each year. Operational needs and capital improvements are included in the
analysis. The proposed financial scenario demonstrates a planned use of cash reserves to finance capital
projects.
The proposed financial scenario evaluates the impact of future costs and the revenue sources that will be
required to meet those costs. The proposed water rates in the financial scenario will increase the Utility’s fixed
and variable cost recovery.
2
The Water Utility Commission and Water Utility staff have made the following recommendations on water
rates in the proposed financial scenario for Fiscal Year 2026/27:
A. Increase to the potable water base rates
A.Current and proposed monthly base rates for potable water are shown in Table 1 below:
Table 1
Cost per month
The financial impact of the proposed base and commodity rate increase for a customer with a 5/8-inch meter
using 7,000 gallons is $1.86 per month. Customers with a 5/8-inch meter represent 84 percent of the total
customer base and include residential, commercial and irrigation classifications with the vast majority of those
being residential.
Water Utility staff presents this water rates analysis in support of the recommended rates contained in the
proposed financial scenario. The Oro Valley Water Utility Commission and Water Utility staff respectfully
recommend the proposed increase to the potable base rates and increase to the potable commodity rates as
detailed in the proposed financial scenario.
3
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
WATER UTILITY
WATER RATES ANALYSIS REPORT
MARCH 2026
Introduction
The Oro Valley Water Utility was established in 1996 as a self-supporting enterprise of the Town. The Water
Utility is comprised of two separate funds that have been established for specific purposes. The Funds are as
follows:
► Operating Fund
► Water Resource and Development Impact Fee Fund
The Operating Fund is the primary fund for the Water Utility. Revenues for this fund include water sales,
service fees, miscellaneous charges and interest income. The expenses in this fund include personnel,
operations and maintenance for both potable and reclaimed water systems, capital costs for existing potable
water system improvements and related debt service. The Water Utility pays the General Fund for services
received including finance, human resources, fleet services, information technology, legal, insurance and
rental of office space; however, it does not receive revenue from taxes or other payments from the General
Fund. Additional information is provided on page 11 of this report.
Groundwater Preservation Fee (GPF) revenue and expenses are accounted for within the Operating Fund but
are segregated because GPF revenue is restricted for specific uses. This is illustrated in Appendix A, Page A-2.
The Water Resource and Development Impact Fee Fund (WRSDIF) is used to account for development impact
fees collected. Funds may be used for all types of water resources, the infrastructure to deliver those resources
and any related debt including Central Arizona Project (CAP) capital infrastructure repayment costs.
Additional information is provided on page 15 of this report.
The revenue and expenses of the Operating Fund and the WRSDIF Fund are combined to determine if the
Water Utility meets the debt service coverage requirement established in the Mayor and Town Council water
policies and current bond covenants. Revenues and expenses are accounted for separately in each fund.
Pursuant to ARS 9-463.05 Section B.9., impact fees must be placed in a separate fund and accounted for
separately. ARS 9-463.05 Section B.5. states that the impact fees may not be used for operations and
maintenance of existing facilities.
4
Methodology
Step 1: Five-Year Financial Plan
The first step of the water rates analysis is to develop a five-year financial plan that projects the Water Utility’s
revenues, expenses, capital project financing, annual debt service, and cash reserve funding. The factors used
in determining the projections are growth rates, water use trends, debt service coverage requirements, cash
reserve requirements and inflation rates. The financial plan is used to determine the revenue adjustment, which
allows the Water Utility to recover adequate revenues to fund expenses and cash reserves.
Step 2: Revenue Requirement Determination for Test Year
After completing the five-year financial plan, the rate-setting process can begin by determining the revenue
requirement for the test year, also known as the rate-setting year. The test year for this water rates analysis is
Fiscal Year 2024/25 which will be used to capture the rate impacts resulting from a change in rate structure
without a revenue adjustment. The revenue requirement should sufficiently fund the Water Utility’s operating
and maintenance (O&M) costs, annual debt service, capital improvement plan (CIP) costs, and cash reserve
funding for the upcoming Fiscal Year 2026/27 budget.
Step 3: Water Rates Analysis
The annual cost of providing water service, or the revenue requirements, is then distributed to customer classes
and tiers based on their water usage and demand on the system. Fixed and variable costs are analyzed to
determine the impact on customer classes and tiers.
Step 4: Rate Design and Calculation
After allocating the revenue requirements to each customer class and tier, the rate design and calculation
process can start. Rates are designed to properly support and optimize the Water Utility’s policies and
objectives. Rates also act as a public information tool in communicating these policy objectives to customers.
This process also includes a rate impact analysis for all proposed water rates and sample customer bill impacts.
Step 5: Administrative Record Preparation and Rate Adoption
The final step in a water rates analysis is to develop the administrative record in preparation for the rate
adoption process. The administrative record, also known as the Water Rates Analysis Report, documents the
results of the water rate analysis and presents the methodologies, rationale, justifications, and calculations
utilized to determine the proposed water rates.
5
Growth Rates
As indicated in the graph below, new metered connections have been declining due to the slowdown in new
development within the Town. The Water Utility had a total of 2,588 new metered connections from Fiscal
Year 2015/16 through Fiscal Year 2024/25. At the end of Fiscal Year 2024/25, the customer base totaled
21,609 metered connections.
In developing the growth projections, assistance was received from the Town’s Community and Economic
Development Department for the current housing inventory, along with plans that have been submitted for
review, to conservatively estimate future growth. The growth projections used for this report are consistent
with the Town’s financial forecast.
6
Water Use Trends
Water use remains consistent even though the number of connections has increased by 2,588 over the last ten
years. The graph below indicates actual water usage from Fiscal Year 2015/16 through Fiscal Year 2024/25.
As noted below, in Fiscal Year 2015/16 water usage was at 2,929 million gallons and 2,992 million gallons in
Fiscal Year 2024/25. An increase of 63 million gallons. The revenue projections in this water rate analysis
compiled water data from Fiscal Year 2024/25 when the average water use was 7,000 gallons per month,
which is consistent with prior years.
Historically there has been a decline in water use not only on a local level, but also on regional and national
levels. This can be largely attributed to water conservation – both intentional and unintentional. Intentional
water conservation is the conscious effort to reduce water use by commonly known measures including
changing landscape to drought tolerant plants and the removal of lawns. Unintentional water conservation is a
result of plumbing code changes and other regulatory changes regarding water efficiency. For example, all
new water using appliances and fixtures are required to be low flow. The consumer’s intention may not have
been to conserve water when they chose to replace an ageing or broken dishwasher, clothes washer or
bathroom faucet.
7
Debt Service
The current annual debt service obligations are met with revenue generated from water rates, groundwater
preservation fees and impact fees. A summary of the existing debt and the outstanding balances as of June 30,
2025, are shown below in Table 3.
Table 3
In April 2017, the Town entered into an Intergovernmental Agreement with the Metropolitan Domestic Water
Improvement District and the Town of Marana to construct a recharge, recovery and delivery system known as
the Northwest Recharge, Recovery, and Delivery System (NWRRDS) project to bring additional Central
Arizona Project (CAP) water into the Town.
In FY 2025/26, the water utility will issue approximately $11 million in new debt for the NWRRDS project.
Repayment of this debt will be paid with Groundwater Preservation Fees (GPF) and Water Resource and
System Development Impact Fees (WRSDIF).
There is no new debt for existing system capital improvements in this analysis. Capital costs in the five-year
capital plan for existing system projects will be cash funded.
8
Debt Service Coverage Requirements
The method for calculating the debt service coverage ratio is pursuant to the Town Financial and Budgetary
Policies adopted by the Town Council in 2023. Section 1-9 Debt, Policy 9.0 - Pledging of Utility Revenues
states the following with respect to debt service coverage ratios: “When utility revenues are pledged as debt
service payments, the Town will strive to maintain a 1.3 times debt service coverage ratio to ensure debt
coverage in times of revenue fluctuation. This will be in addition to the required ratio of the bond indenture”.
The 2014 Water Infrastructure Finance Authority (WIFA) loan, Series 2021 senior lien water revenue
refunding bond and Series 2025 senior lien water revenue obligations are used in the calculation of the debt
service coverage requirement. The Water Utility revenues are specifically pledged as the repayment source for
these obligations at 1.3 times coverage per the Town’s adopted financial policy.
The remaining outstanding debt obligations of the Water Utility are excise tax pledged obligations meaning
that the Town’s unrestricted sources of sales taxes, fines, permit fees and state shared revenues are pledged as
repayment sources for these bonds in the bond indentures. Even though the bond indentures pledge these
excise taxes as the repayment source, the Water Utility is responsible for these debt service payments from
water sales revenues. However, since excise taxes are pledged as coverage, a calculated debt service coverage
ratio of 1.0 is applied to avoid double coverage when calculating the debt service coverage ratio for these
excise tax-backed bonds in the water rates analysis.
Bond indentures for the excise tax-backed bonds require that the Town’s excise tax collections each fiscal year
total at least 2.5 times the annual debt service requirements to avoid funding a debt service reserve fund. These
conditions have been met annually in the past and are expected to continue in the future.
This methodology of segregating the water utility revenue-pledged debt from the excise tax-pledged debt in
the rates analysis process is an accepted practice in the industry and has been reviewed by the Town’s Chief
Financial Officer and the Town’s financial advisors with Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Inc.
The debt service coverage ratio is determined by dividing the annual net operating revenue by the annual debt
service payments. The methodology described above is in accordance with the 2023 policy and reduces the
amount of the required debt service coverage. Applying this methodology has been key in minimizing water
rate increases.
Debt service coverage for the Water Utility’s outstanding senior lien debt issuances and loans in the proposed
financial scenario is shown in Table 4 below. As shown below, debt service coverage increases as existing
debt service is paid off.
Table 4
9
Cash Reserve Policy
The cash reserve policy may be found in the Town of Oro Valley Mayor and Council Water Policies Section
II.A.1.d. The policy states “The Utility shall maintain a cash reserve in the Operating Fund of not less than
20% of the combined total of the annual budgeted amounts for personnel, operations and maintenance, and
debt service. This cash reserve amount specifically excludes budgeted amounts for capital projects,
depreciation, amortization and contingency. No cash reserve is required for the water utility impact fee
funds”.
In the proposed financial scenario, the projected cash reserve balance for the Operating Fund for each year in
the analysis is listed below in Table 5 showing compliance in all years. The projected cash reserve balances
include annual increases as shown in tables 7 and 8.
Table 5
Cash reserve balances in the Operating Fund are projected to be stable throughout the analysis. This is a result
of strategically balancing the required financing of capital projects with the planned use of cash reserves.
There is no cash reserve requirement for revenue from the GPF because these funds are restricted to pay for
renewable water resources, infrastructure and associated debt. Although accounted for in the Operating Fund,
the GPF cash is segregated from the Operating Fund cash. It is not fiscally prudent to combine cash that has a
restricted use with cash that has unrestricted use when determining compliance with a cash reserve policy.
Expenses paid by GPF revenue are segregated from the general operating expenses for the purpose of
calculating the cash reserve requirement. In the proposed financial scenario, the projected cash reserve balance
for the GPF in each year of the analysis is listed below in Table 6.
Table 6
GPF cash reserve balances are projected to remain stable over the five-year projection period. This is a direct
result of balancing the use of cash and new debt service to pay for capital projects associated with the delivery
of additional CAP water through the NWRRDS project.
10
Operating Fund
Revenue Forecast
The Operating Fund is projected to have a cash balance of $5,155,412 at the beginning of Fiscal Year 2026-27
and is projected to have a balance of $7,681,424 at the end of Fiscal Year 2030/31. These funds may be used
for operating costs including personnel, operations and maintenance, capital improvements for the existing
potable water system and debt service.
Groundwater Preservation Fees are included in the Operating Fund; however, the revenues, expenses and cash
balances for the GPF are accounted for separately within the Operating Fund and are not included in the cash
balance above. The use of GPF funds is restricted to renewable water resources, infrastructure and associated
debt.
The following revenue forecast was based on analysis of the Water Utility’s historic water use trends and
projected growth in the number of new connections. The revenue forecast includes proposed increases in the
potable water base rates as shown below in Table 7.
Table 7
11
The revenue forecast proposes no increases in the potable water commodity rates as shown below in Table 8:
Table 8
The potable base rates are projected to increase annually, beginning in Fiscal Year 2026/27 and continue with
modest increases through Fiscal Year 2030/31. The potable commodity rates are projected to remain the same
in Fiscal Year 2026/27 through Fiscal Year 2030/31.
Table 9 below includes the water sales for potable, reclaimed and GPF revenue forecast for the five-year
projection period using the proposed base and commodity rates:
Table 9
Other revenue generated by the Utility consists of service fees and charges. Service fees and charges include
funds received from an Intergovernmental Agreement with the Pima County Wastewater Reclamation
Department to provide monthly billing services on their behalf. Service fees and charges also include, but are
not limited to, new service establishment fees, late fees, reconnection fees, inspection fees and plan review
fees. The total of all service fees and charges is projected to generate annual revenue of $850,000.
Projections for interest income for the Operating Fund are a cumulative total of $500,000 over the five-year
period. Projected interest income for the GPF monies is a cumulative total of $250,000 over the five-year
period.
12
Revenue Requirements
Below in Table 10 is a summary of revenue requirements for the Operating Fund that were used in the
financial analysis. These revenue requirements exclude expenses to be paid with GPF revenue.
Table 10
Projected personnel costs include 3 percent annual merit increases, retirement contributions of 12 percent and
3 percent annual increases in health care costs. There are no new employees being added within the five-year
projection period. A portion of the personnel costs are allocated to the reclaimed water system based on a
weighted average of 5.10 percent annually.
The projected operations and maintenance (O&M) costs for both the potable and reclaimed water systems are
based on the Fiscal Year 2025/26 budget and include inflationary increases of 3 percent annually. A cost
allocation model is used to allocate various administrative and operational costs to the reclaimed water system.
Costs charged by Tucson Water for wheeling reclaimed water are projected to increase 5.50 percent annually.
Central Arizona Project (CAP) wheeling costs are fees charged by Tucson Water to wheel Oro Valley’s CAP
water through their recharge and recovery system. The Intergovernmental Agreement with Tucson Water was
renegotiated in Fiscal Year 2016/17. Costs are projected to increase by 5.50 percent annually. The total annual
delivery of 2,850 acre-feet is projected in the five-year projection period.
Central Arizona Project (CAP) water recharge costs represent costs to take annual delivery of the Utility’s
entire CAP water allotment of 10,305 acre-feet. This water will be recharged and stored in various recharge
facilities including the Tucson Water facilities. Costs to take delivery of and store the CAP water are
calculated with the rate schedule adopted by the Central Arizona Project. In Fiscal Year 2026/27 the CAP
delivery rate will increase by 7.46% as projected by the CAP rate table.
Projected capital outlay for existing system improvements in this analysis includes well rehabilitation, tank
replacement, re-lining of reservoirs, booster station modifications, water main replacements, vehicles and
water meters. These projects will be cash-funded in the five-year projection period. The schedule for five-year
capital improvements may be found in Appendix C.
13
Potable existing system debt service is declining as debt is paid. GPF and WRSDIF debt service will increase
by approximately $11 million in FY 2025/26 for the NWRRDS project. Repayment of this debt will be paid
with GPF and WRSDIF funds.
Expenses paid with GPF funds include the existing customers’ portion of CAP water capital costs associated
with ownership of the CAP water allotment. These costs increase annually based on projected rates developed
by the Central Arizona Project.
Debt service for the reclaimed water system is paid for with GPF funds. Outstanding debt on the reclaimed
water system will be paid in full by Fiscal Year 2029/30. Forty percent of NWRRDS debt service will be paid
with GPF funds.
Table 11 is a summary of expenses paid with GPF revenue that were used in this financial analysis:
Table 11
14
Water Resource and System Development Impact Fee Fund
The Water Resource and System Development Impact Fee Fund (WRSDIF) is used to account for
development impact fees collected. Revenues are from impact fees collected at the time water meters are
purchased and from interest income. Expenses include capital repayment obligation charges for the Town’s
CAP allotment, CAP infrastructure and associated debt incurred to deliver CAP water to the Town to meet the
demands of future growth. In addition, wells, pump stations, reservoirs and mains for the potable water system
required to meet the demands of future growth will also be financed with these impact fees.
The WRSDIF Fund is projected to have a cash balance of $1,798,497 at the beginning of FY 2026/27 and is
projected to have $842,884 at the end of FY 2030/31. The revenue sources for the WRSDIF Fund are from
impact fees collected when a water meter is purchased and from interest earned on cash balances. Projected
interest income for the WRSDIF monies is a cumulative total of $375,000 over the five-year period.
The revenue forecast was based on new service units related to the number of new connections. A service unit
is the equivalent of one single family residential (SFR) 5/8-inch water meter. The SFR service units are equal
to the number of new connections. Other service units are forecasted based on pending development projects
within the Town. Other service units include commercial, multi-family and irrigation uses with the number of
service units depending on the estimated meter sizes for each project. In addition, the service units are
forecasted based on historic trends and pending development projects within the Town.
The impact fee for a SFR 5/8-inch water meter or one service unit is projected to be $6,387. It is assumed that
the Development Impact Fees will remain constant throughout the five-year projection period. Table 12 below
indicates the projected growth in additional metered connections and the revenue associated with that growth.
These growth projections are consistent with the Town’s financial planning.
Table 12
WRSDIF funds may be used for capital expenses related to CAP water. Capital costs assessed by the Central
Arizona Project for 3,000-acre feet of the Town’s CAP water allotment are included under operating expenses.
Capital expenses in Fiscal Year 2026/27 include $1.8 million for the completion of the NWRRDS project
which will deliver up to an additional 4,000-acre feet of CAP water to the Town. Completion of this project is
expected to be in early 2027. Funds may also be used for capital expenses related to potable water system
improvements including wells, booster stations, reservoirs and water mains required to meet the demands of
new growth. Capital projects are identified in the five- year capital improvement plan shown in Appendix C.
Debt service for previously constructed growth-related facilities is also paid from impact fee revenue. Sixty
percent of impact fee funds will pay debt associated with NWRRDS. The annual expenses and debt service
for the WRSDIF Fund are listed in Table 13.
Table 13
15
16
Proposed Financial Scenario
Prior to developing forecasts, financial considerations were evaluated relating to projected operating costs,
capital expenses, the Water Utility’s existing cash reserves, existing outstanding debt and debt service
payments. When developing a proposed financial scenario, the goal of the Water Utility is to ensure all
existing rate setting policies are met, cash reserves are utilized to minimize future debt and proposed rate
increases do not result in rate shock. A rate setting policy included in the Mayor and Council Water Policies is
for the rate structures to be designed to encourage water conservation.
The development of water conservation pricing, also known as a tiered commodity rate, began in 1999 when a
second tier was added to the uniform or flat commodity rate. That structure evolved into four tiers by 2007.
The Water Utility has increased the tiered commodity rates to a level that encourages water conservation.
This year, the proposed financial scenario includes an increase to the potable base rates, no increase to the
potable commodity rates and no increase to the reclaimed rates.
The chart below illustrates potable and reclaimed water deliveries remaining stable over the last ten years even
though the Water Utility experienced growth in the customer base.
2015
/
1
6
2016
/
1
7
2017
/
1
8
2018
/
1
9
2019
/
2
0
2020
/
2
1
2021
/
2
2
2022
/
2
3
2023
/
2
4
2024
/
2
5
3,500
3,000
2,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
500
0
GA
L
L
O
N
S
D
E
L
V
I
E
R
E
D
(
M
I
L
L
I
O
N
S
)
2,929 3,044 3,275
2,707 2,927 3,231 2,981 2,762 2,948 2,992
Water Sales & Growth
(potable & reclaimed)
Water Sales Service Connections
17
Table 14 below illustrates how regional water providers have increased their base rate for a 5/8-inch meter as
compared to the historical and the 2026 proposed rates for Oro Valley.
Table 14
Table 15 illustrates Oro Valley’s proposed potable base and commodity rates per 1,000 gallons. Water rates of
other water providers in the region are included for comparison purposes along with water resource fees that
are similar to the Oro Valley Water Utility GPF.
Table 15
The Water Utility developed a proposed financial scenario that supports key financial and policy goals. The
proposed scenario generates the revenue needed to maintain an adequate cash balance in all funds over the
projected five-year period therefore meeting the cash reserve requirements in each year.
The financial projections for the Operating Fund and WRSDIF Fund were combined to evaluate the overall
debt service coverage at the end of each fiscal year. Analysis indicates that, under the proposed financial
scenario, the Utility will meet the debt service coverage requirement established by the Mayor and Council
Water Polices and bond covenants for all five years.
The proforma for the proposed financial scenario may be found in Appendix A. The assumptions used to
develop the financial projections in the proposed financial scenario may be found in Appendix D.
18
Recommendation on Water Rates
After reviewing the analysis of the two funds and their respective revenue requirements contained in the
proposed financial scenario, the Water Utility Commission and Water Utility staff recommend the following
for Fiscal Year 2026/27:
A. Increase to the potable water monthly base rates
A.Table 16 below are the proposed potable water base rates for each meter size. Approximately 84
percent of Utility customers have a 5/8-inch water meter and consume an average of 7,000 gallons.
These customers will see an increase in their bill of $1.86 per month.
Table 16
Cost per month
Direct comparison of specific base rates and commodity rates is not ideal for cost comparisons because of the
varying rate structures of each utility. A more effective comparison is to calculate the cost for specific
consumption levels for one month. Table 17 below provides a calculation of a monthly bill amount for a single
-family residential customer with a 5/8-inch meter for the water utilities surrounding the Oro Valley Water
Utility area. Note: Table 17 does not include the surrounding utilities proposed rate increases for next fiscal
year.
Table 17
Proposed rates for all Oro Valley Water Utility meter sizes may be found in Appendix B. In addition, tables
that calculate monthly bills under the proposed rates may also be found in Appendix B. Monthly bill amounts
are calculated in 1,000-gallon increments for a 5/8-inch meters and a variety of increments for larger meter
sizes.
19
Conclusion
On an annual basis, the water rates analysis is prepared with the most up-to-date information available.
Operational needs and capital improvement requirements change annually and are carefully evaluated when
they are included in the analysis. It is important that the Water Utility perform a water rates analysis every year
to plan for changes in operating costs, capital costs or debt service.
This Water Rates Analysis Report is presented in support of the water rates contained in the proposed financial
scenario. The Oro Valley Water Utility Commission and the Water Utility staff respectfully recommend
approval of the water rates detailed in the proposed financial scenario.
The Oro Valley Water Utility staff and Commission are dedicated to serving the Town of Oro Valley and the
customers of its water utility and extend their appreciation to the Mayor and Council for consideration of the
recommended water rates.
APPENDIX A
Proposed Financial Scenario Pro Forma
A-1 Operating Fund
A-2 Groundwater Preservation Fee
A-3 Water Resource and System Development Impact Fee Fund
A-4 Summary of All Funds
Oro Valley Water Utility – Operating Fund
A-1
Oro Valley Water Utility – Operating Fund
Groundwater Preservation Fees
A-2
Water Resource and System Development Impact Fee Fund
A-3
Summary of All Funds
A-4
Summary of All Funds
A-5
APPENDIX B
Rate Schedules & Tables for Bill Comparisons
B-1 Proposed Water Rate Schedule
B-2 Tables for Bill Comparisons by Meter Size – Potable
B-8 Tables for Bill Comparisons by Meter Size – Reclaimed
APPENDIX C
5-Year Capital Improvement Schedules
C-1 Operating Fund
C-2 Groundwater Preservation Fee
C-3 Water Resource and System Development Impact Fee Fund
C-1
C-2
C-3
APPENDIX D
Assumptions for Proposed Financial Scenario
D-1 Operating Fund
D-4 Water Resource and System Development Impact Fee Fund
PROPOSED FINANCIAL SCENARIO
ASSUMPTIONS FOR THE WATER UTILITY’S
OPERATING FUND
The Operating Fund is the primary fund for the Water Utility. The sources of revenue are water sales, service-
related charges and Groundwater Preservation Fees (GPF). Expenses for administration, operations, existing
system improvements and debt service are accounted for in this fund.
Beginning Cash Balance
The beginning cash balance is estimated based on budgeted revenues, expenses and known cost over runs for
FY 2025/26. Actual cash balances on the 6/30/25 balance sheet is added to budgeted revenues, less budgeted
expenses and known unbudgeted expenses.
Cash Reserve Requirement
Mayor and Town Council Water Policies require the Utility to maintain cash reserves in the Operating Fund of
not less than 20% of the combined total of the annual budgeted amounts for personnel, O&M and debt service.
This specifically excludes expenses for capital projects, depreciation, amortization, and contingency.
Growth Projections
New Development growth projections for FY 2025-26 through FY 2029-30 were based on data provided by the
Town’s New Development Permitting Manager and were updated with information from the Town’s Finance
Department to be consistent with the Town’s financial forecasting.
Connections FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30 FY 30-31
Single Family Residential 97 142 130 92 60
Other Connections 12 6 6 6 6
Water Sales and Water Use Consumption Trends
The average monthly water consumption for a residential customer with a 5/8-inch water meter in FY 2024-25
was 7,000 gallons per month. To account for the overall average continued decline in water consumption, this
analysis assumes 7,000 gallons per month. Projected reclaimed deliveries are based on Water Utility Director
estimates.
Service-Related Revenues
Service-related revenues are based on the proposed FY 2026-27 budget. Service-related revenues include
billing for sewer fees on behalf of Pima County Wastewater and the Town’s Storm Water Department.
Additionally, other service-related revenues include late fees, reconnect fees, new service establishment fees,
backflow permitting fees, engineering plan review fees and construction inspection fees.
Groundwater Preservation Fees (GPF)
GPF revenues are based on water consumption for FY 2024-25. The GPF funds are dedicated to paying for
water resources other than groundwater as it relates to debt service, capital costs, CAP delivery costs and
water wheeling.
D-1
PROPOSED FINANCIAL SCENARIO
ASSUMPTIONS FOR THE WATER UTILITY’S
OPERATING FUND (continued)
Interest Income
Interest rates are projected at 3% annually over the 5-year pro-forma.
Personnel
No new employees were added during the projection period. Annual merit increases are projected to be 3%
annually and health care costs are projected to increase by 3% annually. It is projected that the Arizona State
Retirement System (ASRS) contribution is projected to increase 1% annually over the five-year projection
period.
Inflation Rates
Inflation rates are projected at 3% annually over the 5-year pro-forma.
O&M Potable Expenses
These expenses are based on the Water Utility’s budget for FY 2025-26 plus 3% inflation.
O&M CAP Wheeling Expenses - Potable
This expense includes the fees charged by Tucson Water to wheel the Town’s CAP water through their recharge
and recovery system in accordance with an IGA. The increases are projected to be 5.5% annually over the 5-
year pro-forma. It is also assumed that the Utility will wheel 2,850 AF annually.
O&M CAP Recharge Expenses - Potable
This expense is based on the rate schedule adopted by CAP 6/5/25. The figures represent the annual expense
to deliver the Utility’s entire allotment of CAP water (10,305 AF) for recharge.
O&M Reclaimed Expenses
Pursuant to the existing IGA, the reclaimed water is delivered on a non-interruptible basis at an interruptible
rate. Inflationary increases of 3% are included annually.
The Town delivers more reclaimed water than it is entitled to. To cover this shortfall the cost to purchase
additional reclaimed water from Tucson Water has been included annually.
Additionally, the O&M expenses include allocations for personnel, administrative costs and fleet service costs.
The reclaimed cost allocation model was used to allocate these costs using a variety of methodologies.
O&M CAP Capital Expenses
This expense is paid for from the GPF funds and is based on 7,305 AF per the rate schedule adopted by CAP
6/5/25.
D-2
PROPOSED FINANCIAL SCENARIO
ASSUMPTIONS FOR THE WATER UTILITY’S
OPERATING FUND (continued)
O&M Administrative Services Fee
This expense is paid to the Town’s General Fund for services such as Finance, Legal, Procurement, Information
Technology and Human Resources provided to the Water Utility. Inflationary increases of 3% are included
annually.
Capital Improvement Program (CIP) – Existing System Improvements
The capital costs associated with Existing System Improvements CIP are primarily to ensure continued reliability
and efficiency of the Utility’s water system. These costs are determined as part of an annual review of the
water system. $12.9 million in capital costs for existing system improvements are included in the 5-year
projection period.
Capital Improvement Program (CIP) – NWRRDS
A portion of the capital costs associated with the NWRRDS CIP are paid for by GPF funds. The NWRRDS CAP
delivery system will be capable of delivering up to an additional 4,000 acre-feet per year of CAP water into Oro
Valley’s water service area. The 5-year pro-forma is based on Engineering cost estimates.
Debt Service
The following table identifies the existing debt service included in this pro forma:
Bonds Type Description Amortization Schedule By
2014 Sr. Lien AMI Project WIFA
2017 Excise Tax Refunding (2007) Stifel & Nicolaus & Co.
2018 Excise Tax Existing System CIP Stifel & Nicolaus & Co.
2021 Sr. Lien Refunding (WIFA & 2012) Stifel & Nicolaus & Co.
2025 Sr. Lien NWRRDS Stifel & Nicolaus & Co.
2025 Sr. Lien NWRRDS WIFA
In FY 2025/26, new debt in the amount of $11 million is for the NWRRDS project. Forty percent of Groundwater Preservation Fees
(GPF) will be used for repayment.
Minimum Debt Service Coverage Requirement
1.30 debt service coverage ratio for Sr. Lien Bonds & all WIFA Loans
D-3
PROPOSED FINANCIAL SCENARIO
ASSUMPTIONS FOR THE WATER UTILITY’S
WATER RESOURCE AND SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE (WRSDIF) FUND
The WRSDIF fund accounts for development impact fees that are collected at the time a new water meter is purchased.
This impact fee is intended to fund costs for water resources, the infrastructure to deliver those resources and any
related debt including CAP capital infrastructure repayment related to new development.
Beginning Cash Balance
The beginning cash balance is estimated based on budgeted revenues, expenses and known cost over runs for
FY 2025-26. Actual cash balances on the 6/30/25 balance sheet is added to budgeted revenues, less budgeted
expenses.
Growth Projections
New Development growth projections for FY 2026-27 through FY 2030-31 were based on data provided by the
Town’s New Development Permitting Manager and were updated with information from the Town’s Finance
Department to be consistent with the Town’s financial forecasting.
Service Units FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Single Family Residential SU’s 97 142 130 92 60
Other Connections 12 6 6 6 6
Interest Income
Interest rates are projected at 3% annually over the 5-year pro-forma.
O&M CAP Capital Expenses
This expense is based on 3,000 AF per the rate schedule adopted by CAP on 6/5/25.
Capital Improvement Program (CIP) – NWRRDS
A portion of the capital costs associated with the NWRRDS CIP are paid for by the WRSDIF Impact fees. The
NWRRDS CAP delivery system will be capable of delivering up to an additional 4,000 acre-feet per year of CAP
water into Oro Valley’s water service area.
Debt Service
The following table identifies the existing debt service included in this pro forma:
Bonds Type Description Amortization Schedule By
2021 Sr. Lien Refunding (WIFA & 2012) Stifel & Nicolaus & Co.
2025 Sr. Lien NWRRDS Stifel & Nicolaus & Co.
2025 Sr. Lien NWRRDS WIFA
In FY 2025/26, new debt in the amount of $11 million is for the NWRRDS project. Sixty percent of WRSDIF Impact fees will be used
for repayment.
Debt Service Coverage
1.30 debt service coverage ratio for Sr. Lien Bonds
D-4
APPENDIX E
Development Impact Fee Schedule
E-1 Water Resource and System Development Impact Fees
Notice of Intent to
Increase Water Rates
FY 2026-27
By: Peter A. Abraham, P.E.
March 4, 2026
Notice of Intent (NOI) to Increase Water Rates
2
Adoption of NOI pursuant to A.R.S. § 9-511.01
Begins formal process to increase water rates
Adoption of NOI does not increase or modify water rates
Makes the 2026 Water Rates Analysis Report available for public review
Placed in Town Clerk’s office
Placed on Water Utility website
Placed in Water Utility’s lobby
Directs the Town Clerk to publish the resolution in a newspaper of general circulation at least 20 days prior to the public hearing
Establishes a public hearing date for June 3, 2026
Rate Drivers
3
What is driving a water rate increase?
Increasing operating expenses (Personnel, O&M, Power, CAP delivery, CAP wheeling): Up $900,000 / 5.94%
What is the Utility doing to offset increasing costs?
Reduced Capital spending, no additional staff, reduced debt paid by rates & operational efficiencies: $450,000 in savings
Cash reserve requirements determine annual revenue requirements:
Utility must maintain an operating cash reserve requirement of 20% of personnel, O&M and debt
Cash reserves at end of FY must exceed cash reserve requirement
Water rate report is now available to the public
Proposed Potable Water Rates and Fees
Proposed Changes to the Potable Water Base Rate:
Water base rates increase by meter size:
84% of customers have a 5/8-inch meter and will see a $1.86 per month increase in the base rate
No proposed changes to the commodity rate:
Commodity Tiers Current Proposed Increase
Tier 1 (68%) – 14576 (Up 276)$ 3.02 No change $ 0.00 (0.0%)
Tier 2 (28%) – 5998 (Up 223)$ 5.02 No change $ 0.00 (0.0%)
Tier 3 (4%) – 862 (Down 188)$ 8.17 No change $ 0.00 (0.0%)
Tier 4 (<1%) – 102 (Down 98)$ 12.32 No change $ 0.00 (0.0%)
Meter Size Current Proposed Monthly
(in inches)Potable Base Rates Potable Base Rates Increase
5/8 $ 23.31 $ 25.17 $ 1.86
3/4 $ 34.93 $ 37.72 $ 2.79
1 $ 58.23 $ 62.89 $ 4.66
1.5 $ 116.47 $ 125.79 $ 9.32
2 $ 186.35 $ 201.26 $ 14.91
3 $ 372.68 $ 402.49 $ 29.81
4 $ 582.33 $ 628.92 $ 46.59
6 $1,164.65 $1,257.82 $ 93.17
8 $1,863.45 $2,012.53 $149.08
Customers continue to respond favorably to the current commodity rate structure:
Customers historically in Commodity Tiers 2, 3 & 4 are migrating to Tiers 1, 2 & 3
No proposed changes to the reclaimed rate:
No proposed changes to the Groundwater Preservation Fee:
Potable Water Cost Comparisons
5
Monthly Water Bill Comparisons to Other Water Providers:
84% of Oro Valley Water Utility customers have a 5/8-inch meter and consume an average of 7,000 gallons per month
These customers will see an increase to their monthly bill of $1.86 or 3.6% increase
Below is a graphical representation of Oro Valley’s current and proposed water bill compared to neighboring water providers
Schedule
6
11/10/26 Commission made a recommendation on water rates
03/04/26 Present Notice of Intent to increase rates to Town Council
03/05/26 Publish public hearing date on Town website – 60 day notice
03/05/26 Publish Notice of Intent in newspaper – 20 day notice
06/03/26 Town Council to hold public hearing on proposed rate increase
07/04/26 New rates become effective – 30 days after adoption
7
Questions?
Town Council Regular Session 2.
Meeting Date:03/04/2026
Requested by: Paul Keesler Submitted By:Paul Keesler, Public Works
Department:Public Works
SUBJECT:
RESOLUTION NO. (R)26-09, APPROVING A REVISION TO THE NARANJA DRIVE MULTI-USE PATH
ALIGNMENT VIA CHANGE ORDER TO THE CURRENT CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT BY THE
REALLOCATION OF FUNDING FROM THE ORO VALLEY DRIVE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AND
THE LA CANADA COBO IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Staff is requesting consideration by Council to redirect CIP unused funding from the Oro Valley Drive Drainage
Project and Cobo Drive Improvements to be applied to the Naranja Drive MUP construction project.
During the initial Naranja Drive MUP design phase, the engineer's estimate exceeded the budget by $870,000.
This caused the team to need to value engineer the project to closer meet the budget. As we had been designing
the project to be as cost-effective as possible, there were not many opportunities to reduce scope. The two largest
choices we had at that point were:
Not continue the MUP all the way to La Canada on the north side of Naranja. Essentially, stop the project
at Copper Creek and utilize the existing street crossing and continuance of MUP on the south side of
Naranja Dr. over to La Canada.
Discontinue the MUP in front of Naranja Town Park and utilize the existing MUP staff built to access the
park.
Staff chose to implement the value engineering in front of the park and approached the Council for an additional
$341K to pay for keeping the north side of the MUP extending all the way to La Canada.
However, now there is the opportunity to fund the value engineering cut in front of Naranja Town Park and revert
the MUP alignment back to the original design which creates a much more direct path along Naranja Drive. There
is $400K available between two projects that we either received outside funding to complete, or is being
reconsidered:
The Oro Valley Drive Drainage and Pavement Improvement project at $300K, was fully funded and
executed by the County Regional Flood Control District. This $300K is available within the current CIP
budget as excess funding.
La Cañada Cobo Improvement at $100K, is being reconsidered due to upcoming changes in area traffic
patterns due to the Self-Storage project moving forward. This identified improvement will be reevaluated in
the future whether it's needed or not after the additional access being provided by Self-Storage has
normalized traffic flow patterns.
Staff is requesting that this $400K be available to be applied to the realignment of the MUP more directly along
Naranja Drive:
Any unused funds will be returned.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
The final design plans for the Naranja Drive Multi-Use Path project utilized the existing segment of path within Naranja Park
from Mousette Drive running adjacent to the archery range parking lot and connecting to Naranja Drive east of the
right-turn lane into the park on Naranja Drive.
ADOT’s designer, EPS Group, submitted Stage III (60%) design plans in December 2024. At that time, the estimated
construction costs exceeded the funded budget by over $870,000. Project staff reviewed multiple items for cost savings,
including the alignment of the section between Musette Drive and Monterra Vista Drive.
Evaluation started with moving the path north of the drainage culverts and into the park to utilize the existing walking path
through Naranja Park. ADOT’s Environmental group identified that as a federally funded project, impacts of clean water
regulations, the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), evaluations for cultural, biological, and Preliminary Initial Site
Assessment (PISA) reports, and US Department of Transportation Section 4(f) strict requirements for use of park lands,
would likely be detrimental to the feasibility of the entire project. Such items would increase time and costs with reports for
clearances, survey and design. Further evaluation was considered to move the path alignment north of the existing
culverts, to a lower flow location where a smaller drainage pipe could be utilized, while keeping the path improvements
within the Right-of-Way. EPS submitted Stage IV design plans with this proposed change and excess design funding was
moved to construction funding, however the estimated construction costs still exceeded funding by $350,000.
At that time, the improved portion of the path in this section was removed to allow additional savings needed to bring the
project within budget. The designer revised the plans to tie the new path construction into the existing pedestrian facilities
along the west side of Musette Drive and to the existing path east of the right-turn lane into the park. The estimated
construction cost fell within the available budget and the project proceeded to advertisement and bid. There were 4
Addendums issued during the bid advertisement and the costs were estimated to be about $30,000 above funding. At the
bid opening, the low bid resulted in a construction cost above the federal funding available and the Town contributed
$341,000 to proceed with construction.
Evaluation of Realignment of MUP:
The section of the path between Station 137+00 and Station 144+50, from Musette Drive to the east for approximately 750
feet, would run adjacent to the roadway rather than on the existing path through Naranja Park. This alignment requires the
extension of 5 existing 72”x 48” Corrugated Metal Arch Pipe (CMAP), as well as the removal and replacement of concrete
and rock-faced concrete slope protection. The culvert extension would accommodate the 10 ft MUP adjacent to Naranja
Drive, in line with the rest of the project improvements.
Execution schedule
Granite was awarded a construction contract on July 18, 2025, and began work on Naranja Drive in mid-September 2025.
The construction, under the current design, is expected to be completed in early May 2026. The additional work added by
this alignment change is expected to add at least 45 days total to the schedule and push completion to late-June 2026.
Execution of the change would start with approval of the $13,552 post design contract modification for EPS Group. Once
funds are received by ADOT, EPS estimates 2 weeks of work and 1 week of review to complete the design. Unlike the
original design process, the review by ADOT and Town staff will be streamlined and limited to those currently involved on
the project.
Then, once the design is complete and the Town has agreed upon the construction costs, the funds can be provided to
ADOT and execution of the construction change order may proceed. Currently this cost is estimated to be about $350,000.
In coordination with ADOT, Granite has stated that they do not expect a supplier problem in obtaining the elliptical pipe and
there is currently adequate dirt remaining on the site for the necessary fill. The change is expected to add around 30 days of
construction to accommodate the drainage culvert extensions with concrete collars, grading, slope protection with rock and
concrete, paving and finishings.
As part of the execution of this alignment change, Town staff will coordinate the relocation of the existing Naranja Park
Monument sign. Public Works obtained information from Parks and Recreation that the sign was originally installed by
Territorial Signs in 2015 for about $20,000 and is composed of a steel sign box with a faux rock base and solar lighting. The
sign was previously relocated in 2018 for a cost of just over $2,000. Town staff would again work with Territorial Signs to
relocate the monument and the cost would be separate from the other costs presented herein.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Staff and ADOT estimate that the cost of this realignment will be $350K.
Cost for Design
ADOT has retained the designer, EPS Group, with a standard post design contract for $21,738. This covers EPS staff work
such as attending meetings, responding to contractor’s requests for information, submittal reviews and completion of
as-built plans. The proposed alignment was included in the draft plans at Stage III (60%) and EPS has provided a proposal of
$13,552 to bring those plans to 100% design. The original design contract for EPS was $643,324 and this contract
modification is about a 2% increase. The design will also include minor design oversite costs for ADOT staff review.
Cost for Construction
ADOT is currently coordinating with Granite for the construction cost estimate and has established that Granite will hold to
contract unit pricing for existing items, with preliminary estimates of the hard costs around $260,000. The major new item
being the 72”x 48” CMAP, which staff estimates at approximately $87,000 for purchase and installation. Total Drainage
construction costs are estimated at approximately $262,000, including items such as removals, testing and ADOT
construction oversite. Overall costs for the path construction - again including removals, testing, asphalt and base material,
concrete curb, signs/markings and ADOT construction oversite - are estimated at an additional $65,000. These cost
estimates are subject to change as Granite investigates material availability and equipment/staff costs. Contractors also
have the right to add a premium charge for work added during construction. Staff estimates that the overall construction
cost will be around $350,000, which is a 12.8% increase to the construction contract.
Funding
The Stormwater Utility has used capital funds to contribute to funding these changes. The Oro Valley Drainage Channel
Project originally budgeted $300,000 in capital funds. Through coordination with Pima County Flood Control, the project
was fully funded externally, leaving that balance unused. The improvements to align the MUP adjacent to Naranja Drive
would maintain proper stormwater conveyance, protect existing drainage infrastructure, and ensure long-term system
performance. Using these funds to support stormwater-related components of the Naranja Drive MUP realignment allows
the Town to address necessary drainage improvements without affecting other planned capital or operation budgets. The
path improvements directly support stormwater infrastructure and thus the use of Stormwater Utility capital funds is
appropriate and consistent with Utility objectives.
Other funds that may be contributed are the budgeted Highway User Revenue Fund (HURF) capital funds for the La Cañada
Drive at Cobo Avenue improvements. The Miller Ranch Self Storage development at the commercial area on the northwest
corner of La Cañada Drive and Tangerine Road has approved plans for construction of their facility between Leman
Academy Oro Valley and Tangerine Road. The development includes paved access from Tangerine Road just west of La
Cañada Drive which will trigger a change in traffic patterns for that area. Public Works believes that such changes should be
evaluated prior to any improvements on Cobo Avenue, leaving that balance of $100K unused. The path improvements
provide infrastructure enhancements that increase safety for pedestrians and cyclists, thus are appropriate and consistent
with HURF capital improvement projects.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to Approve (or Deny) RESOLUTION NO. (R)26-09, approving a revision to the Naranja Drive multi-use
path alignment via change-order to the current construction contract by the reallocation of funding from the Oro
Valley Drive Drainage Improvement project and the La Canada Cobo Improvement project
Attachments
(R)26-09 Naranja MUP Reallocation of Funds
Staff Presentation
RESOLUTION NO. (R)26-09
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING THE
REALLOCATION OF FUNDS FROM THE ORO VALLEY DRAINAGE
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AND THE LA CANADA COBO
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT TO THE MULTI-USE PATH ON NARANJA
DRIVE BETWEEN LA CANADA DRIVE AND FIRST AVENUE; AND
DIRECTING THE TOWN MANAGER, TOWN CLERK, TOWN LEGAL
SERVICES DIRECTOR, OR THEIR DULY AUTHORIZED OFFICERS
AND AGENTS TO TAKE ALL STEPS NECESSARY TO CARRY OUT
THE PURPOSES AND INTENT OF THIS RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, on November 16th, 2022, the Town entered into an Intergovernmental Agreement
(IGA) with the Regional Transportation Authority (RTA) to fund the construction of the Naranja
Multi-Use Path (MUP) via Resolution (R)22-52; and
WHEREAS, on June 7, 2023, the Town entered into an IGA with the Arizona Department of
Transportation for the provision of federal funds for the construction of the Naranja MUP via
Resolution (R)23-22; and
WHEREAS, the Town, via Resolution (R)25-34, allocated additional funds to the Naranja MUP
after the funds provided by ADOT, and the funds provided by the RTA proved insufficient to
complete the project; and
WHEREAS, the Oro Valley Drive Drainage and Pavement Improvement Project, projected to
cost $300,000, was fully funded and executed by the County Regional Flood Control District,
thereby freeing up $300,000 for transfer; and
WHEREAS, the La Canada Cobo Improvement Project, projected to cost $100,000, is being
reconsidered due to upcoming changes in area traffic patterns due to a Self-Storage project that is
moving forward, thereby freeing up $100,000 for transfer; and
WHEREAS, the funds for the Oro Valley Drive Drainage and Pavement Improvement Project
and the La Canada Cobo Improvement Project, totaling $400,000, can now be reallocated to the
Naranja MUP Project in order to fund elements of the project that had to be removed from the
original plans due to the costs exceeding the budget for the project; and
WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the Town to reallocate the funds from the Oro Valley
Drive Drainage and Pavement Improvement Project and the La Canada Cobo Improvement
Project to the Naranja MUP.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro
Valley, Arizona, that:
SECTION 1.The funds from the Oro Valley Drive Drainage and Pavement
Improvement Project and the La Canada Cobo Improvement Project are hereby
reallocated to the Naranja MUP.
SECTION 2. The Town Manager, Town Clerk, Town Legal Services Director, or
their duly authorized officers and agents are hereby authorized and directed to
take all steps necessary to carry out the purposes and intent of this resolution.
SECTION 3. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this
Resolution is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision
of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity
of the remaining portions thereof.
SECTION 4. All Oro Valley resolutions or motions and parts of resolutions or
motions of the Council in conflict with the provision of this Resolution are hereby
repealed.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this
4th day of March, 2026.
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
Joseph C. Winfield, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Michael Standish, Town Clerk Andrew Votava, Interim Legal Services Director
Date:Date:
Naranja Dr. MUP
Opportunity to Improve Path Alignment
March 4, 2026
Opportunity to Improve the MUP Alignment
During the initial design efforts, value engineering needed to be employed to meet
budget:
The engineer's estimate exceeded the budget by $870,000
The two largest choices we had at that point were:
•Not continue the MUP all the way to La Canada on the north side of Naranja.
•Discontinue the MUP in front of Naranja Town Park and utilize the existing MUP staff built to access the park.
Staff chose to implement the value engineering in front of the park and approached
the Council for an additional $341K to pay for keeping the north side of the MUP
extending all the way to La Canada.
As this year’s budget has progressed, we have an opportunity to redirect CIP funds
either not used or being suggested not to be used:
Oro Valley Drive Drainage and Pavement Improvement
La Canada Cobo Improvement
Naranja MUP Alignment Choices
Recommendations
There is $400,000 in Budgeted CIP available:
The Oro Valley Drive Drainage project was completely funded by the County, therefore that Stormwater funding of
$300,000 is presently unused.
Since the Miller Ranch Self -Storage facility is getting ready to start construction soon. Staff is suggesting not to
conduct the Cobo Improvements ($100,000 budgeted) until after Leman traffic has normalized after the new
Tangerine access is operational. Then reassess traffic needs.
The estimate for this path realignment is $350,000. Most of the work is drainage related
Staff recommends reallocation of CIP funds to enable this alignment for a more
contiguous MUP with the street
Town Council Regular Session 3.
Meeting Date:03/04/2026
Requested by: Paul Keesler Submitted By:Paul Keesler, Public Works
Department:Public Works
SUBJECT:
DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE DIRECTION FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT THE
INTERSECTION OF MUSETTE DRIVE AND TANGERINE ROAD
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends moving forward with the installation of the signal for the following reasons:
The volume warrants are almost met, per the MUTCD.
Even with the vegetation removal, the vertical curvature of the street alignment partially occludes full sight
distance.
The current MUTCD does allow jurisdictions the ability to weigh in factors beyond warrants to install a
signal, where we are concerned over full & clear sight distance.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
During the FY25/26 Budget study sessions, Council asked what happens if the intersection still does not meet
warrant for this CIP project. Staff made the reply that if warrant was not met, staff would return to Council for
direction. This is the purpose of this agenda item.
In August 2025, PSOMAS conducted a signal warrant analysis per the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD)
published by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and concluded the following: “At Tangerine Road and Musette
Drive, criteria were not met for any of the nine signal warrants. However, some of the warrants, like the peak hour warrant,
are close to being met. It is likely that the peak hour warrant (and possibly other warrants) may be met as the park builds
out, additional gatherings occur (such as soccer, football, etc. leagues), and traffic volumes on Tangerine Road increase.
Therefore, although a signal is not warranted today, it is recommended that the intersection be monitored and that the
warrants be reevaluated as park operations change.”
In addition to the warrants defined in the MUTCD, there are additional conditions to evaluate that might warrant a traffic
signal. One is the available sight distance for minor street vehicles to enter major street traffic streams. While the MUTCD
warrants evaluate traffic volumes and flow to determine available space for vehicles to enter from the side street, they do
not directly account for sight distance at the intersection. Sight distance ensures that drivers have adequate time to react
and increase their speed to enter the flow of traffic. At the Tangerine Rd. and Musette Dr. intersection, there is a vertical
curve for westbound traffic that drops vehicles below the line of sight. So, the sight distance was evaluated in the field for
northbound traffic turning left onto Tangerine Rd.
The Town of Oro Valley Subdivision Street Standards defines the sight distance for a posted speed of 45 mph as 470 feet
and for a design speed of 50 mph as 580 feet. The AASHTO Geometric Design of Highways and Streets equates the sight
distance for 50 mph with truck traffic as 588 feet. When the sight distance was first measured in the field, it was not met
due to vegetation in the median. Since some vegetation has been removed, there is now more sight distance available,
measuring at 650 feet. However, it is still partially occluded by the vertical curvature of Tangerine Rd. to the east.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
The traffic on Musette Drive has increased due to the connection of the roadway for access to Naranja Park and the
The traffic on Musette Drive has increased due to the connection of the roadway for access to Naranja Park and the
addition of amenities at the park. As drivers have utilized the new access, some complaints have been received by the
Town in regard to safely making northbound left-turns to head westbound on Tangerine Road. The Town had consultant
PSOMAS evaluate the intersection for traffic signal warrants.
To evaluate the warrants, data was collected over multiple days at the intersection to capture busy periods for the park
which are outside of the typical weekday peaks. The busiest hour for traffic exiting the park was 7:00 – 8:00 PM on a
Thursday, and there were similar busy periods on Friday evening and midday Saturday. Peak Hour traffic volumes are
shown below.
The MUTCD defines nine signal warrants to be evaluated when considering installation of a traffic signal at an unsignalized
intersection. The analysis for the Tangerine Rd and Musette Dr intersection is summarized below. The 70% conditions were
used to evaluate the intersection, as required for the posted speed limit on Tangerine is 45 mph.
Warrant 1 8-hour vehicular volume: Musette Dr must have a
minimum of 70 vehicles per hour for 8 hours Not met
Warrant 2 4-hour vehicular volume: Musette Dr must have a
minimum of 80 vehicles per hour for 4 hours Not met
Warrant 3
Peak Hour: Musette Dr must have delay of over 5
vehicle hours and volumes over 150 vph, plot
conflicting traffic volumes where point must fall
above threshold line
Not met for delay or volumes. Midday
Saturday volumes peak at 1530 vph on
Tangerine Rd and 93 vph on Musette Dr,
where the threshold for Musette Dr is
100 vph
Warrant 4 Pedestrian volume: Applies to pedestrians crossing
Tangerine Rd N/A
Warrant 5 School crossing: student crossing is principal reason
to consider traffic signal N/A
Warrant 6 Coordinated Signal System: distance between
signals is less than 1,000 ft N/A
Warrant 7
Crash Experience: Other alternatives have not
reduced crashes, 5 or more crashes in 12 months
that are correctable with a signal, volumes meet
Warrant 1 conditions
Not met
2019-2023 – single crash with one
vehicle and an animal that resulted in
no injuries
Warrant 8 Roadway network: Intersections of 2 major routes N/A
Warrant 9 Intersection is near at grade rail crossing N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:
This item is fully budgeted within the current CIP at $750,000
This item is fully budgeted within the current CIP at $750,000
The design of the traffic signal at Tangerine Road and Musette Drive is contracted with PSOMAS for $74,029. The design
will provide sealed plans for construction and an estimate of the construction costs.
The construction is funded by the remainder of the $750,000 budget item, which is $675,971. The construction includes cost
of poles, mast arms, signal heads, camera network, controller equipment, cabinet, detection, wiring, etc. as well as the cost
to install the items.
The Town will assist with the installation as far as setting up the equipment and wiring in the cabinet and programming the
controller. Town staff will also perform the regular and on-call maintenance for the traffic signal which is funded by the
traffic signals budget.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to (APPROVE) the installation of a traffic signal for the intersection of Musette Dr. and Tangerine Rd.
OR
I MOVE to direct staff to not install a traffic signal at the intersection of Musette Dr. and Tangerine Rd., but to
continue monitoring and bring back this project once warrants are fully met.
Attachments
Attachment 1 - Traffic Warrant Study
Staff Presentation
Tangerine Rd/Musette
Dr Signal Warrant and
Rancho Vistoso
Blvd/Vistoso Village Dr
HAWK Warrant
Evaluations
PREPARED FOR
August 2025
TANGERINE ROAD/MUSETTE DRIVE SIGNAL WARRANT AND
RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD/VISTOSO VILLAGE DRIVE HAWK
WARRANT EVALUATIONS
ORO VALLEY, AZ
Prepared For
Prepared By
Psomas Project No. 7TOV230104
August 2025
August 2025 Signal and HAWK Warrant Evaluations Page i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION _________________________________________________________ 1
2. EXISTING STUDY AREA CONDITIONS ____________________________________ 2
2.1. ROADWAY NETWORK _____________________________________________________ 2
2.2. TRAFFIC VOLUMES _______________________________________________________ 4
2.3. CRASH HISTORY _________________________________________________________ 6
3. SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS – TANGERINE ROAD/MUSETTE DRIVE ______ 7
3.1. WARRANT 1 – EIGHT-HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUME _____________________________ 7
3.2. WARRANT 2 – FOUR-HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUME ______________________________ 8
3.3. WARRANT 3 – PEAK HOUR _________________________________________________ 9
3.4. WARRANT 4 – PEDESTRIAN VOLUME _______________________________________ 10
3.5. WARRANT 5 – SCHOOL CROSSING __________________________________________ 11
3.6. WARRANT 6 – COORDINATED SIGNAL SYSTEM _______________________________ 11
3.7. WARRANT 7 – CRASH EXPERIENCE _________________________________________ 11
3.8. WARRANT 8 – ROADWAY NETWORK ________________________________________ 12
3.9. WARRANT 9 – INTERSECTION NEAR A GRADE CROSSING _______________________ 12
4. HAWK WARRANT EVALUATION – RANCHO VISTOSO BLVD/VISTOSO
VILLAGE DR _______________________________________________________________ 13
5. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS __________________________________ 15
6. REFERENCES __________________________________________________________ 16
APPENDIX A – TRAFFIC VOLUME DATA
APPENDIX B – ADOT PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL WARRANT EVALUATION SHEET
August 2025 Signal and HAWK Warrant Evaluations Page ii
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 1. EXISTING INTERSECTION GEOMETRY – TANGERINE ROAD AND MUSETTE DRIVE ____________ 3
FIGURE 2. EXISTING INTERSECTION GEOMETRY – RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD AND VISTOSO VILLAGE
DRIVE/THE LOOP _________________________________________________________________ 3
FIGURE 3. PEAK HOUR VOLUMES – TANGERINE ROAD/MUSETTE DRIVE ___________________________ 5
FIGURE 4. PEAK HOUR VOLUMES – RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD/VISTOSO VILLAGE DRIVE/THE LOOP _ 5
FIGURE 5. WARRANT 2 – FOUR-HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUME (70% FACTOR) ________________________ 9
FIGURE 6. WARRANT 3 – PEAK HOUR (70% FACTOR) _________________________________________ 10
FIGURE 7. GUIDELINES FOR INSTALLATION OF PHBS ON HIGH-SPEED ROADWAYS __________________ 13
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 1. WARRANT 1 – EIGHT-HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUME CONDITIONS A AND B___________________ 8
August 2025 Signal and HAWK Warrant Evaluations Page 1
1. INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this study is to provide evaluation of the traffic signal warrants at the
intersection of Tangerine Road and Musette Drive and evaluation of the need for a HAWK
pedestrian signal at the intersection of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard and Vistoso Village
Drive. Although the two locations are not related, the evaluation of both locations is
included in this report.
The Tangerine Road/Musette Drive intersection serves the newly expanded Naranja Park
along with a residential development. Because of the increase in traffic and expected
growth, the Town requested evaluation of the intersection to determine if a traffic signal is
warranted. Traffic volume data was collected over multiple days, including weekends, to
try to capture the busiest period for the intersection.
The west leg of the Rancho Vistoso Boulevard/Vistoso Village Drive intersection is The
Loop, a shared use path which extends around the Tucson metropolitan area. The Loop
was recently extended to Rancho Vistoso Boulevard at this location in early 2024. A
HAWK pedestrian signal has been requested at this location, so the intersection is
evaluated in this report to determine if a pedestrian signal is or will be needed.
This report includes evaluation of the appropriate warrants and guidance for each location
as well as recommendations for possible improvements and next steps.
August 2025 Signal and HAWK Warrant Evaluations Page 2
2. EXISTING STUDY AREA CONDITIONS
2.1. ROADWAY NETWORK
Tangerine Road is a four-lane divided roadway with a posted speed limit of 45 mph. At
the intersection of Tangerine Road and Musette Drive, the roadway features eastbound
and westbound left turn lanes. The roadway is classified as a major arterial1.
Musette Drive is generally a two-lane undivided roadway with a posted speed limit of 20
mph. The roadway provides access to a residential neighborhood near Tangerine Road
and the newly expanded Naranja Park. Musette Drive provides access to both Tangerine
Road and Naranja Drive. At its intersection with Tangerine Road, Musette Drive includes
separate left turn and right turn lanes. A southbound left turn lane is also provided for
drivers wishing to turn east onto Sonatina Lane and the existing residential development.
Musette Drive is classified as a local street by the Town.
Rancho Vistoso Boulevard is a four-lane divided roadway with a posted speed limit of
45 mph. At the intersection of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard and Vistoso Village Drive, the
roadway features northbound and southbound left turn lanes. The roadway is classified
as a minor arterial by the Town.
Vistoso Village Drive is a two-lane undivided roadway with a posted speed limit of 25
mph. The roadway is classified as a local street by the Town and provides access to the
Vistoso Vistas residential area. At its intersection with Rancho Vistoso Boulevard, the
roadway widens to include two outbound lanes. The west leg of the intersection is a
portion of The Loop, a shared use path around the Tucson metropolitan region.
The two study intersections are shown in Figures 1 and 2.
August 2025 Signal and HAWK Warrant Evaluations Page 3
Figure 1. Existing Intersection Geometry – Tangerine Road and Musette Drive
Figure 2. Existing Intersection Geometry – Rancho Vistoso Boulevard and
Vistoso Village Drive/The Loop
August 2025 Signal and HAWK Warrant Evaluations Page 4
2.2. TRAFFIC VOLUMES
The existing traffic volumes for both intersections were collected by Field Data Servies of
Arizona, Inc. Because of the unique characteristics of both intersections, the following
data was collected:
· Tangerine Road/Musette Drive
o 24-hour turning movement count, Thursday, March 27, 2025
o 24-hour directional counts on each approach, Thursday through Sunday,
March 27-30, 2025
o 24-hour directional counts on each approach, Tuesday through Monday,
June 24-30, 2025
· Rancho Vistoso Boulevard/Vistoso Village Drive
o 24-hour turning movement count, Saturday, March 29, 2025
Includes bicycle movements separately
Data was collected over multiple days at Tangerine Rad and Musette Drive in an attempt
to capture busy periods for the park which are outside of the typical weekday peaks. The
busiest hour for traffic exiting the park was 7:00 – 8:00 PM on a Thursday, but there were
similar busy periods on Friday evening and midday Saturday.
To help determine when to collect data at the Rancho Vistoso Boulevard/Vistoso Village
Drive intersection, bicycle and pedestrian counts on The Loop were reviewed. The busiest
period at The Loop counter closest to the study area was found to be Saturday, so data
was collected on a Saturday.
At the Tangerine Road/Musette Drive intersection, the March volumes were higher than
the June volumes and were therefore used in the warrant analysis. Figures 3 and 4 show
the peak hour volumes at the Tangerine Road/Musette Drive and Rancho Vistoso
Boulevard/Vistoso Village Drive intersections, respectively. The collected traffic volume
data is included in Appendix A.
August 2025 Signal and HAWK Warrant Evaluations Page 5
Figure 3. Peak Hour Volumes – Tangerine Road/Musette Drive
Figure 4. Peak Hour Volumes – Rancho Vistoso Boulevard/Vistoso Village
Drive/The Loop
August 2025 Signal and HAWK Warrant Evaluations Page 6
2.3. CRASH HISTORY
Crash data was obtained from the PAG Safety Explorer for the five-year period from
January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2023 for the study intersections. Note that although the
Tangerine Road/Musette Drive intersection has existed during that entire period, the
connection to Naranja Park only opened in May 2024. In addition, The Loop was not
paved to Rancho Vistoso Boulevard until early 2023. Therefore, both intersections should
continue to be monitored as uses and operations have changed significantly.
From 2019 to 2023, there was one crash attributed to the Tangerine Road/Musette Drive
intersection and three crashes attributed to the Rancho Vistoso Boulevard/Vistoso Village
Drive intersection. The crash on Tangerine Road was a single vehicle crash involving an
animal which resulted in no injuries. Two of the crashes attributed to the Rancho Vistoso
Boulevard/Vistoso Village Drive are signal related; because the intersection is not
signalized, it is assumed that those crashes were coded incorrectly. The lone remaining
crash was a single vehicle crash resulting in no injuries.
August 2025 Signal and HAWK Warrant Evaluations Page 7
3. SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS – TANGERINE ROAD/MUSETTE DRIVE
The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices2 (MUTCD) provides nine signal warrants
which are to be evaluated when considering the installation of a traffic signal at an
unsignalized intersection. Each of the warrants is briefly described below, and the
applicable warrants are evaluated.
For warrants which include an option, the 70% warrant values will be used because the
posted speed limit on Tangerine Road is 45 mph, exceeding the 40 mph threshold. In
addition, for warrants where number of lanes is an option, two or more lanes per direction
are considered on Tangerine Road and on Musette Drive.
Signal warrants were evaluated for the existing intersection geometry, considering
collected 2025 traffic volumes.
3.1. WARRANT 1 – EIGHT-HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUME
This warrant evaluates locations where either a large volume of intersecting traffic on the
minor street (Condition A) or traffic volumes on the major street are heavy enough to cause
excessive delays for minor street traffic (Condition B) are the main reasons for considering
the installation of a traffic signal. Table 1 (Table 4C-1 in the MUTCD) shows the conditions
for Warrant 1.
· Conditions must be met for at least eight hours during the day and must be met on
both roadways for the same eight hours.
· If either condition is met, the warrant is considered to be satisfied (use 70% factor
for speed limit on major road higher than 40 MPH).
· If the 80% conditions are met for both conditions for both roadways, the warrant is
considered to be satisfied (use 56% factor for speed limit on major road higher
than 40 MPH).
Traffic volumes on Musette Drive do not exceed 70 vehicles per hour for eight hours (the
minimum option to meet the warrant), so the intersection overall currently does not meet
either condition of the warrant for eight hours. Therefore, Warrant 1 is not met.
August 2025 Signal and HAWK Warrant Evaluations Page 8
Table 1. Warrant 1 – Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume Conditions A and B
3.2. WARRANT 2 – FOUR-HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUME
This warrant is intended for locations where the volume of intersecting traffic is the
principal reason to consider installing a traffic signal. The warrant is satisfied if volumes
for four or more hours fall above the applicable line in Figure 5 (Figure 4C-2 in the
MUTCD).
Because the minor street (Musette Drive) is two lanes, the minimum volume is 80 vehicles
per hour. That volume was only reached or exceeded in two hours at most on any of the
days during which data was collected. Therefore, Warrant 2 is not met.
August 2025 Signal and HAWK Warrant Evaluations Page 9
Figure 5. Warrant 2 – Four-Hour Vehicular Volume (70% Factor)
3.3. WARRANT 3 – PEAK HOUR
This warrant is intended for use at a location where traffic conditions for a minimum of one
hour on an average day result in excessive delay for vehicles on the minor street.
· Condition A is met if all three of the following are true:
o The total stopped time delay for traffic on one minor-street approach equals
or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one lane approach or five vehicle-hours
for a two-lane approach.
o The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction) equals or
exceeds 100 veh/hr for one moving lane of traffic or 150 veh/hr for two
moving lanes.
o The total entering volume during the hour equals or exceeds 650 veh/hr for
an intersection with three approaches or 800 veh/hr for an intersection with
four or more approaches.
· Condition B is met if the plotted point falls above the applicable line in Figure 6
(Figure 4C-4 in the MUTCD).
August 2025 Signal and HAWK Warrant Evaluations Page 10
Figure 6. Warrant 3 – Peak Hour (70% Factor)
The minor street (Musette Drive) approach volumes never exceeded 150 vehicles per hour
during the data collection in the Spring and Summer of 2025. Therefore, Condition A is
not met.
Figure 6 shows the plotted point for the lone hour during which the minor street meets the
minimum volume threshold for satisfying the warrant. A second plotted point, where the
minor street volume falls just below the threshold, is also shown. Although the second
plotted point is just seven vehicles short of the thresholds, neither point exceeds the
applicable line on the figure, so Condition B is not currently met.
Because the peak hour volumes do not fulfill the requirements of Condition A or B,
Warrant 3 is not met.
3.4. WARRANT 4 – PEDESTRIAN VOLUME
This warrant is intended for application where the traffic volume on a major street is so
heavy that pedestrians experience excessive delay in crossing the major street.
However, because no pedestrians were observed crossing Tangerine Road, this
warrant was not evaluated.
August 2025 Signal and HAWK Warrant Evaluations Page 11
3.5. WARRANT 5 – SCHOOL CROSSING
This warrant is intended for locations where the fact that schoolchildren (defined as
elementary school through high school aged) cross the major street is the principal reason
to consider installing a traffic signal. Although there are schools in the project vicinity,
this warrant was not evaluated because the schools are not directly accessed from
this intersection.
3.6. WARRANT 6 – COORDINATED SIGNAL SYSTEM
This warrant is used for locations where it may be necessary to install a traffic signal to
maintain proper platooning of vehicles. The MUTCD guidance is that the Coordinated
Signal System signal warrant should not be applied where the resultant spacing of traffic
control signals would be less than 1,000 feet. The nearest signalized intersection to
either intersection considered in this study is 4,200 feet away, so this warrant was
not evaluated.
3.7. WARRANT 7 – CRASH EXPERIENCE
This warrant is intended for use where the severity and frequency of crashes are the
principal reasons to consider installing a traffic signal. All of the following criteria must be
met for the warrant to be satisfied:
· Adequate trial of alternatives with satisfactory observance and enforcement has
failed to reduce the crash frequency.
· Five or more reported crashes correctable with a traffic signal have occurred within
a 12-month period.
· Traffic volumes for at least eight hours of an average day must meet the 80%
conditions for Condition A or Condition B of Warrant 1.
As discussed in Section 2.3, there was only one crash at the intersection, and it was not
correctible with a signal. Therefore, Warrant 7 is not met.
August 2025 Signal and HAWK Warrant Evaluations Page 12
3.8. WARRANT 8 – ROADWAY NETWORK
The roadway network warrant can be applied where an intersection includes two major
routes, as defined in the MUTCD. One or both of the following criteria must be met for a
signal to be warranted:
· The intersection has a total existing or immediately projected entering volume of
at least 1,000 vehicles per hour (vph) during the peak hour of a typical weekday
and has 5-year projected traffic volumes that meet one or more of Warrants 1, 2,
and 3 during an average weekday.
· The intersection has a total existing or immediately projected entering volume of
at least 1,000 vehicles per hour for any 5 hours of a Saturday or Sunday.
The MUTCD classifies a road as major route if it has at least one of the following
characteristics:
· It is part of the street or highway system that serves as the principal roadway
network for through traffic flow.
· It includes rural or suburban highways outside, entering, or traversing a city.
· It appears as a major route on an official plan, such as a major street plan in an
urban area traffic and transportation study.
Musette Drive is not a major route. Therefore, Warrant 8 was not evaluated.
3.9. WARRANT 9 – INTERSECTION NEAR A GRADE CROSSING
This warrant is intended for use at an intersection for which the proximity to an at-grade
rail crossing is the principal reason to consider installing a traffic signal. There are no at-
grade rail crossings in the vicinity of the study intersection, so Warrant 9 was not
evaluated.
August 2025 Signal and HAWK Warrant Evaluations Page 13
4. HAWK WARRANT EVALUATION – RANCHO VISTOSO BLVD/VISTOSO
VILLAGE DR
The Rancho Vistoso Boulevard/Vistoso Village Drive intersection currently operates with
stop control on Vistoso Village Drive. As previously mentioned, the west leg of the
intersection is a newer section of The Loop, completed in early 2023. There are existing
bike lanes on Rancho Vistoso Boulevard and a sidewalk along the east side of the
roadway. There is also a sidewalk on the north side of Vistoso Village Drive, but no
delineated bicycle facilities. This evaluation was conducted as a response to a request to
consider a HAWK signal/pedestrian hybrid beacon (PHB) at the intersection.
The MUTCD states that a pedestrian signal can be installed whether or not the intersection
meets a signal warrant. Additional guidance states that the need for a pedestrian signal
should be considered if the plotted point for one hour of a day is above the applicable
curve in Figure 7 (Figure 4F-2 in the MUTCD). The minimum pedestrian crossing volume
is 20 pedestrians per hour. Only 14 pedestrians were observed crossing Rancho Vistoso
Boulevard during the 24-hour period when data was collected. In addition, only six total
cyclists were observed crossing Rancho Vistoso Boulevard in 24 hours.
Figure 7. Guidelines for Installation of PHBs on High-Speed Roadways
August 2025 Signal and HAWK Warrant Evaluations Page 14
The heaviest bicycle movements accessing The Loop are southbound right turns (which
would not be aided by a signal) and eastbound left turns. The peak hour for eastbound
cyclists making a left turn or a through movement (both of which could be aided by a
HAWK signal) included 18 cyclists. This still falls below the threshold, so a HAWK signal
is not warranted per the MUTCD.
The Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) also provides guidance for when a
HAWK signal should be utilized3. The evaluation includes information about crash history,
nearby signals, traffic volumes, and other applicable characteristics of the roadway and
crossing. The form requires 35 points for a pedestrian signal to be considered; this
crossing earned 23 points. The form is included in Appendix B.
Based on the guidance provided in the MUTCD and by ADOT, a HAWK signal is not
warranted at this time.
August 2025 Signal and HAWK Warrant Evaluations Page 15
5. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This report provided an evaluation of the traffic signal warrants for the intersection of
Tangerine Road and Musette Drive and evaluation of HAWK warrants for the intersection
of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard and Vistoso Village Drive. Data was collected over several
days for the signal warrant evaluation and was collected on a Saturday for the HAWK
warrant evaluation.
At Tangerine Road and Musette Drive, criteria were not met for any of the nine signal
warrants. However, some of the warrants, like the peak hour warrant, are close to being
met. It is likely that the peak hour warrant (and possibly other warrants) may be met as
the park builds out, additional gatherings occur (such as soccer leagues), and traffic
volumes on Tangerine Road increase. Therefore, although a signal is not warranted
today, it is recommended that the intersection be monitored and that the warrants be
reevaluated as park operations change.
At Rancho Vistoso Boulevard and Vistoso Village Drive, the relatively new connection of
The Loop as the west leg of the intersection led to a request for a HAWK signal. There
are not many pedestrians crossing Rancho Vistoso Boulevard at the intersection, but
many cyclists use the intersection. The heaviest cyclist movements are southbound right
turns (onto The Loop) and eastbound left turns (from The Loop to head north on Rancho
Vistoso Boulevard). However, the intersection did not meet the MUTCD guidance for
installing a pedestrian signal, nor did it meet the ADOT guidance for doing so. Therefore,
a HAWK signal is not warranted at this time. However, the intersection can be monitored
to determine if a HAWK signal is needed in the future.
August 2025 Signal and HAWK Warrant Evaluations Page 16
6. REFERENCES
1Oro Valley Circulation Map.
http://agenda.orovalleyaz.gov:8085/docs/2018/PZC/20180501_282/2561_Your%20Voice,
%20Our%20Future%20Circulation%20Map.pdf, accessed June 2025.
2 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), 2009.
3 ADOT Traffic Engineering Guidelines and Processes, 640 – Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon.
https://azdot.gov/sites/default/files/2019/05/tgp0640-2015-06.pdf, Arizona Department of
Transportation, June 2015.
August 2025 Signal and HAWK Warrant Evaluations
Appendix A – Traffic Volume Data
Volumes for:City:Oro Valley
Location :
AM Period NB SB EB WB PM Period NB SB EB WB
00:00 5 7 12:00 230 170
00:15 10 5 12:15 204 165
00:30 1 4 12:30 161 191
00:45 5 21 2 18 39 12:45 202 797 205 731 1528
01:00 4 4 13:00 181 206
01:15 7 5 13:15 179 186
01:30 2 7 13:30 216 174
01:45 3 16 1 17 33 13:45 193 769 193 759 1528
02:00 5 5 14:00 183 206
02:15 1 4 14:15 187 228
02:30 4 4 14:30 211 225
02:45 3 13 3 16 29 14:45 249 830 239 898 1728
03:00 3 3 15:00 229 220
03:15 3 7 15:15 224 262
03:30 4 5 15:30 212 218
03:45 6 16 7 22 38 15:45 240 905 250 950 1855
04:00 14 13 16:00 179 238
04:15 12 15 16:15 225 241
04:30 22 16 16:30 229 229
04:45 34 82 23 67 149 16:45 204 837 212 920 1757
05:00 32 30 17:00 217 236
05:15 37 48 17:15 211 241
05:30 58 40 17:30 185 191
05:45 125 252 59 177 429 17:45 202 815 173 841 1656
06:00 90 57 18:00 190 160
06:15 104 49 18:15 181 182
06:30 142 75 18:30 138 142
06:45 189 525 95 276 801 18:45 149 658 134 618 1276
07:00 202 141 19:00 110 115
07:15 249 173 19:15 96 105
07:30 300 208 19:30 93 135
07:45 275 1026 173 695 1721 19:45 65 364 94 449 813
08:00 232 128 20:00 67 96
08:15 235 148 20:15 64 91
08:30 236 173 20:30 78 62
08:45 240 943 159 608 1551 20:45 47 256 77 326 582
09:00 192 146 21:00 41 53
09:15 178 132 21:15 36 41
09:30 169 148 21:30 48 35
09:45 225 764 162 588 1352 21:45 40 165 31 160 325
10:00 183 122 22:00 16 46
10:15 188 169 22:15 29 23
10:30 191 160 22:30 26 28
10:45 209 771 165 616 1387 22:45 18 89 14 111 200
11:00 168 173 23:00 9 17
11:15 202 185 23:15 11 16
11:30 211 178 23:30 15 8
11:45 203 784 151 687 1471 23:45 7 42 10 51 93
Total Vol.5213 3787 9000 6527 6814 13341
GPS Coordinates:
NB SB EB WB Combined
11740 10601 22341
Split %57.9% 42.1%40.3%48.9%51.1%59.7%
Peak Hour 07:15 10:45 07:15 14:45 15:15 14:30
Volume 1056 701 1738 914 968 1859
P.H.F.0.88 0.95 0.86 0.92 0.92 0.95
Prepared by: Field Data Services of Arizona/Veracity Traffic Group (520) 316-6745
Tangerine Rd west of Musette Dr
PM
Project#Thursday, March 27, 2025
AM
Daily Totals
25-1144-003
DAY 1
32.423904, -110.983419
Volumes for:City:Oro Valley
Location :
AM Period NB SB EB WB PM Period NB SB EB WB
00:00 10 6 12:00 195 190
00:15 3 7 12:15 217 176
00:30 4 6 12:30 213 180
00:45 9 26 1 20 46 12:45 206 831 168 714 1545
01:00 6 8 13:00 195 212
01:15 3 4 13:15 198 226
01:30 2 1 13:30 197 206
01:45 2 13 1 14 27 13:45 217 807 205 849 1656
02:00 5 6 14:00 237 206
02:15 5 1 14:15 232 212
02:30 3 1 14:30 210 258
02:45 2 15 3 11 26 14:45 236 915 226 902 1817
03:00 2 7 15:00 239 237
03:15 3 8 15:15 235 219
03:30 7 5 15:30 219 212
03:45 7 19 8 28 47 15:45 226 919 213 881 1800
04:00 14 7 16:00 231 212
04:15 17 22 16:15 259 194
04:30 21 14 16:30 222 225
04:45 35 87 24 67 154 16:45 258 970 237 868 1838
05:00 28 19 17:00 200 226
05:15 40 35 17:15 206 227
05:30 49 36 17:30 226 208
05:45 111 228 35 125 353 17:45 238 870 188 849 1719
06:00 58 58 18:00 178 150
06:15 98 71 18:15 205 162
06:30 147 70 18:30 163 138
06:45 172 475 88 287 762 18:45 145 691 132 582 1273
07:00 198 109 19:00 125 143
07:15 263 195 19:15 85 137
07:30 249 176 19:30 97 107
07:45 266 976 174 654 1630 19:45 93 400 114 501 901
08:00 219 140 20:00 72 103
08:15 212 165 20:15 68 108
08:30 233 175 20:30 73 88
08:45 208 872 149 629 1501 20:45 50 263 75 374 637
09:00 177 144 21:00 45 78
09:15 165 159 21:15 56 50
09:30 200 138 21:30 47 48
09:45 226 768 163 604 1372 21:45 50 198 44 220 418
10:00 199 163 22:00 37 47
10:15 175 186 22:15 25 35
10:30 181 178 22:30 26 34
10:45 229 784 156 683 1467 22:45 29 117 24 140 257
11:00 195 154 23:00 13 20
11:15 185 185 23:15 21 16
11:30 190 194 23:30 18 16
11:45 209 779 222 755 1534 23:45 12 64 13 65 129
Total Vol.5042 3877 8919 7045 6945 13990
GPS Coordinates:
NB SB EB WB Combined
12087 10822 22909
Split %56.5% 43.5%38.9%50.4%49.6%61.1%
Peak Hour 07:15 11:15 07:15 16:00 14:30 14:30
Volume 997 791 1682 970 940 1860
P.H.F.0.94 0.89 0.92 0.94 0.91 0.98
Prepared by: Field Data Services of Arizona/Veracity Traffic Group (520) 316-6745
DAY 2
32.423904, -110.983419
AM PM
Project#
Tangerine Rd west of Musette Dr
Friday, March 28, 2025 25-1144-003
Daily Totals
Volumes for:City:Oro Valley
Location :
AM Period NB SB EB WB PM Period NB SB EB WB
00:00 13 14 12:00 221 166
00:15 9 5 12:15 177 199
00:30 14 9 12:30 186 199
00:45 9 45 6 34 79 12:45 183 767 179 743 1510
01:00 2 4 13:00 174 194
01:15 11 1 13:15 173 179
01:30 4 4 13:30 183 181
01:45 15 32 2 11 43 13:45 157 687 178 732 1419
02:00 5 3 14:00 153 180
02:15 5 3 14:15 204 161
02:30 8 4 14:30 169 189
02:45 5 23 7 17 40 14:45 184 710 162 692 1402
03:00 6 4 15:00 162 154
03:15 10 1 15:15 173 185
03:30 4 3 15:30 131 173
03:45 8 28 4 12 40 15:45 197 663 155 667 1330
04:00 6 8 16:00 132 146
04:15 7 9 16:15 161 157
04:30 9 10 16:30 177 148
04:45 22 44 18 45 89 16:45 204 674 120 571 1245
05:00 19 12 17:00 215 122
05:15 12 19 17:15 168 141
05:30 31 27 17:30 156 124
05:45 42 104 22 80 184 17:45 151 690 123 510 1200
06:00 34 18 18:00 127 128
06:15 50 20 18:15 136 116
06:30 53 42 18:30 103 131
06:45 70 207 41 121 328 18:45 113 479 97 472 951
07:00 49 55 19:00 90 130
07:15 70 68 19:15 93 114
07:30 113 58 19:30 85 88
07:45 141 373 88 269 642 19:45 69 337 92 424 761
08:00 124 97 20:00 61 81
08:15 118 102 20:15 66 96
08:30 138 98 20:30 57 86
08:45 198 578 94 391 969 20:45 60 244 79 342 586
09:00 158 132 21:00 62 73
09:15 161 133 21:15 33 73
09:30 186 160 21:30 51 54
09:45 180 685 160 585 1270 21:45 52 198 31 231 429
10:00 229 126 22:00 40 44
10:15 208 179 22:15 39 27
10:30 180 171 22:30 33 25
10:45 214 831 181 657 1488 22:45 27 139 31 127 266
11:00 216 190 23:00 20 15
11:15 179 154 23:15 18 8
11:30 201 167 23:30 22 9
11:45 201 797 185 696 1493 23:45 11 71 7 39 110
Total Vol.3747 2918 6665 5659 5550 11209
GPS Coordinates:
NB SB EB WB Combined
9406 8468 17874
Split %56.2% 43.8%37.3%50.5%49.5%62.7%
Peak Hour 10:00 11:45 10:15 12:00 12:15 12:00
Volume 831 749 1539 767 771 1510
P.H.F.0.91 0.94 0.95 0.87 0.97 0.98
Saturday, March 29, 2025 Project#25-1144-003
Prepared by: Field Data Services of Arizona/Veracity Traffic Group (520) 316-6745
Tangerine Rd west of Musette Dr
32.423904, -110.983419 Daily Totals
AM PM
DAY 3
Volumes for:City:Oro Valley
Location :
AM Period NB SB EB WB PM Period NB SB EB WB
00:00 14 8 12:00 174 150
00:15 12 6 12:15 192 139
00:30 11 7 12:30 202 156
00:45 9 46 4 25 71 12:45 156 724 141 586 1310
01:00 6 1 13:00 189 162
01:15 4 3 13:15 183 171
01:30 4 3 13:30 138 153
01:45 4 18 0 7 25 13:45 170 680 151 637 1317
02:00 5 3 14:00 151 131
02:15 3 2 14:15 152 151
02:30 9 1 14:30 169 121
02:45 4 21 4 10 31 14:45 174 646 138 541 1187
03:00 6 3 15:00 129 146
03:15 2 5 15:15 134 160
03:30 3 4 15:30 135 162
03:45 9 20 6 18 38 15:45 155 553 118 586 1139
04:00 1 6 16:00 163 134
04:15 7 7 16:15 148 137
04:30 9 6 16:30 124 133
04:45 13 30 3 22 52 16:45 164 599 115 519 1118
05:00 18 10 17:00 115 125
05:15 9 13 17:15 139 132
05:30 15 11 17:30 117 107
05:45 33 75 18 52 127 17:45 133 504 112 476 980
06:00 22 17 18:00 124 119
06:15 32 21 18:15 139 101
06:30 50 32 18:30 107 95
06:45 67 171 33 103 274 18:45 96 466 99 414 880
07:00 46 26 19:00 80 89
07:15 53 39 19:15 73 123
07:30 60 51 19:30 69 99
07:45 97 256 58 174 430 19:45 59 281 113 424 705
08:00 67 72 20:00 45 79
08:15 71 86 20:15 42 79
08:30 76 95 20:30 46 63
08:45 139 353 93 346 699 20:45 43 176 62 283 459
09:00 102 117 21:00 35 38
09:15 131 109 21:15 42 32
09:30 128 148 21:30 27 39
09:45 146 507 136 510 1017 21:45 29 133 26 135 268
10:00 118 121 22:00 17 23
10:15 117 117 22:15 20 23
10:30 164 144 22:30 15 17
10:45 195 594 125 507 1101 22:45 14 66 12 75 141
11:00 171 130 23:00 11 9
11:15 228 156 23:15 7 6
11:30 177 137 23:30 5 4
11:45 191 767 134 557 1324 23:45 10 33 7 26 59
Total Vol.2858 2331 5189 4861 4702 9563
GPS Coordinates:
NB SB EB WB Combined
7719 7033 14752
Split %55.1% 44.9%35.2%50.8%49.2%64.8%
Peak Hour 10:45 11:45 11:15 12:15 13:00 12:30
Volume 771 579 1347 739 637 1360
P.H.F.0.85 0.93 0.88 0.91 0.93 0.95
Sunday, March 30, 2025 Project#25-1144-003
Prepared by: Field Data Services of Arizona/Veracity Traffic Group (520) 316-6745
Tangerine Rd west of Musette Dr
32.423904, -110.983419 Daily Totals
AM PM
DAY 4
Volumes for:City:Oro Valley
Location :
AM Period NB SB EB WB PM Period NB SB EB WB
00:00 5 7 12:00 234 170
00:15 10 5 12:15 200 165
00:30 1 4 12:30 164 192
00:45 5 21 2 18 39 12:45 203 801 207 734 1535
01:00 4 4 13:00 180 210
01:15 7 5 13:15 180 185
01:30 2 7 13:30 204 177
01:45 3 16 1 17 33 13:45 195 759 194 766 1525
02:00 5 5 14:00 185 208
02:15 1 4 14:15 191 231
02:30 4 4 14:30 208 228
02:45 3 13 3 16 29 14:45 249 833 239 906 1739
03:00 3 3 15:00 227 221
03:15 3 7 15:15 225 265
03:30 4 5 15:30 207 222
03:45 6 16 7 22 38 15:45 236 895 253 961 1856
04:00 14 13 16:00 178 244
04:15 12 15 16:15 226 242
04:30 22 15 16:30 219 238
04:45 34 82 23 66 148 16:45 180 803 224 948 1751
05:00 32 30 17:00 194 245
05:15 36 50 17:15 201 247
05:30 58 40 17:30 173 193
05:45 125 251 58 178 429 17:45 182 750 182 867 1617
06:00 92 55 18:00 182 165
06:15 102 46 18:15 173 170
06:30 142 75 18:30 144 135
06:45 187 523 94 270 793 18:45 146 645 135 605 1250
07:00 204 142 19:00 110 118
07:15 250 178 19:15 97 103
07:30 298 214 19:30 99 118
07:45 270 1022 169 703 1725 19:45 70 376 83 422 798
08:00 225 131 20:00 63 97
08:15 231 148 20:15 60 81
08:30 236 177 20:30 77 69
08:45 241 933 155 611 1544 20:45 54 254 59 306 560
09:00 194 151 21:00 43 58
09:15 177 138 21:15 35 43
09:30 172 151 21:30 45 37
09:45 231 774 169 609 1383 21:45 38 161 33 171 332
10:00 187 122 22:00 22 35
10:15 192 166 22:15 28 25
10:30 190 164 22:30 25 28
10:45 214 783 163 615 1398 22:45 18 93 14 102 195
11:00 169 173 23:00 8 15
11:15 202 186 23:15 8 16
11:30 210 182 23:30 15 8
11:45 202 783 150 691 1474 23:45 7 38 11 50 88
Total Vol.5217 3816 9033 6408 6838 13246
GPS Coordinates:
NB SB EB WB Combined
11625 10654 22279
Split %57.8% 42.2%40.5%48.4%51.6%59.5%
Peak Hour 07:15 10:45 07:15 14:30 15:15 14:30
Volume 1043 704 1735 909 984 1862
P.H.F.0.88 0.95 0.85 0.91 0.93 0.95
Prepared by: Field Data Services of Arizona/Veracity Traffic Group (520) 316-6745
Tangerine Rd east of Musette Dr
PM
Project#Thursday, March 27, 2025
AM
Daily Totals
25-1144-002
DAY 1
32.423887, -110.981012
Volumes for:City:Oro Valley
Location :
AM Period NB SB EB WB PM Period NB SB EB WB
00:00 10 5 12:00 195 192
00:15 3 7 12:15 218 181
00:30 4 6 12:30 212 180
00:45 9 26 2 20 46 12:45 211 836 167 720 1556
01:00 6 8 13:00 194 215
01:15 3 4 13:15 198 227
01:30 2 1 13:30 199 214
01:45 2 13 1 14 27 13:45 215 806 209 865 1671
02:00 5 6 14:00 232 208
02:15 5 1 14:15 231 221
02:30 3 1 14:30 210 258
02:45 2 15 3 11 26 14:45 235 908 223 910 1818
03:00 2 7 15:00 240 241
03:15 3 8 15:15 234 223
03:30 7 5 15:30 224 211
03:45 7 19 8 28 47 15:45 220 918 221 896 1814
04:00 14 7 16:00 224 219
04:15 17 21 16:15 256 196
04:30 22 14 16:30 211 226
04:45 35 88 23 65 153 16:45 237 928 248 889 1817
05:00 28 20 17:00 195 236
05:15 41 35 17:15 203 237
05:30 49 38 17:30 211 216
05:45 111 229 34 127 356 17:45 232 841 203 892 1733
06:00 59 56 18:00 169 150
06:15 95 71 18:15 205 164
06:30 146 70 18:30 167 140
06:45 174 474 90 287 761 18:45 143 684 133 587 1271
07:00 199 109 19:00 123 146
07:15 264 199 19:15 105 126
07:30 247 181 19:30 105 106
07:45 260 970 178 667 1637 19:45 100 433 117 495 928
08:00 218 142 20:00 74 108
08:15 211 170 20:15 68 98
08:30 228 177 20:30 80 89
08:45 208 865 150 639 1504 20:45 50 272 72 367 639
09:00 178 144 21:00 48 75
09:15 160 163 21:15 55 49
09:30 206 140 21:30 50 49
09:45 225 769 162 609 1378 21:45 50 203 46 219 422
10:00 198 162 22:00 38 50
10:15 176 187 22:15 23 37
10:30 182 176 22:30 25 34
10:45 225 781 158 683 1464 22:45 28 114 23 144 258
11:00 196 154 23:00 12 20
11:15 186 186 23:15 20 16
11:30 188 193 23:30 17 16
11:45 212 782 223 756 1538 23:45 12 61 14 66 127
Total Vol.5031 3906 8937 7004 7050 14054
GPS Coordinates:
NB SB EB WB Combined
12035 10956 22991
Split %56.3% 43.7%38.9%49.8%50.2%61.1%
Peak Hour 07:15 11:15 07:15 14:45 16:30 14:30
Volume 989 794 1689 933 947 1864
P.H.F.0.94 0.89 0.91 0.97 0.95 0.97
Prepared by: Field Data Services of Arizona/Veracity Traffic Group (520) 316-6745
DAY 2
32.423887, -110.981012
AM PM
Project#
Tangerine Rd east of Musette Dr
Friday, March 28, 2025 25-1144-002
Daily Totals
Volumes for:City:Oro Valley
Location :
AM Period NB SB EB WB PM Period NB SB EB WB
00:00 13 17 12:00 206 170
00:15 9 5 12:15 175 196
00:30 14 9 12:30 192 199
00:45 9 45 6 37 82 12:45 187 760 171 736 1496
01:00 2 4 13:00 176 189
01:15 11 1 13:15 168 179
01:30 4 4 13:30 187 182
01:45 15 32 2 11 43 13:45 157 688 173 723 1411
02:00 5 3 14:00 153 178
02:15 5 3 14:15 205 170
02:30 8 4 14:30 165 188
02:45 5 23 7 17 40 14:45 186 709 160 696 1405
03:00 6 5 15:00 155 155
03:15 10 1 15:15 172 182
03:30 4 3 15:30 133 171
03:45 9 29 4 13 42 15:45 195 655 158 666 1321
04:00 6 8 16:00 133 146
04:15 7 9 16:15 154 162
04:30 9 10 16:30 179 151
04:45 22 44 17 44 88 16:45 200 666 122 581 1247
05:00 18 12 17:00 212 124
05:15 11 19 17:15 169 144
05:30 31 27 17:30 157 122
05:45 41 101 22 80 181 17:45 155 693 127 517 1210
06:00 31 18 18:00 130 129
06:15 50 21 18:15 131 120
06:30 52 42 18:30 103 134
06:45 71 204 44 125 329 18:45 113 477 100 483 960
07:00 49 52 19:00 92 135
07:15 66 69 19:15 91 112
07:30 96 61 19:30 87 90
07:45 122 333 96 278 611 19:45 69 339 91 428 767
08:00 118 102 20:00 60 84
08:15 120 104 20:15 67 94
08:30 133 100 20:30 57 86
08:45 197 568 109 415 983 20:45 59 243 75 339 582
09:00 156 137 21:00 61 70
09:15 159 132 21:15 33 73
09:30 186 164 21:30 49 53
09:45 170 671 169 602 1273 21:45 48 191 36 232 423
10:00 210 133 22:00 39 40
10:15 209 177 22:15 38 26
10:30 180 172 22:30 31 24
10:45 217 816 182 664 1480 22:45 27 135 31 121 256
11:00 214 181 23:00 19 17
11:15 179 154 23:15 18 7
11:30 198 167 23:30 21 8
11:45 209 800 183 685 1485 23:45 11 69 8 40 109
Total Vol.3666 2971 6637 5625 5562 11187
GPS Coordinates:
NB SB EB WB Combined
9291 8533 17824
Split %55.2% 44.8%37.2%50.3%49.7%62.8%
Peak Hour 10:15 11:45 10:15 12:00 12:15 12:00
Volume 820 748 1532 760 755 1496
P.H.F.0.94 0.94 0.96 0.92 0.95 0.96
Saturday, March 29, 2025 Project#25-1144-002
Prepared by: Field Data Services of Arizona/Veracity Traffic Group (520) 316-6745
Tangerine Rd east of Musette Dr
32.423887, -110.981012 Daily Totals
AM PM
DAY 3
Volumes for:City:Oro Valley
Location :
AM Period NB SB EB WB PM Period NB SB EB WB
00:00 13 8 12:00 166 154
00:15 12 7 12:15 190 140
00:30 11 7 12:30 201 162
00:45 9 45 4 26 71 12:45 159 716 155 611 1327
01:00 6 1 13:00 189 170
01:15 4 3 13:15 183 172
01:30 4 3 13:30 137 159
01:45 4 18 0 7 25 13:45 174 683 150 651 1334
02:00 5 3 14:00 151 141
02:15 3 2 14:15 153 150
02:30 9 1 14:30 169 121
02:45 4 21 4 10 31 14:45 174 647 136 548 1195
03:00 6 3 15:00 129 151
03:15 2 5 15:15 131 163
03:30 3 4 15:30 132 170
03:45 9 20 6 18 38 15:45 155 547 120 604 1151
04:00 1 6 16:00 163 133
04:15 7 6 16:15 148 144
04:30 9 6 16:30 120 131
04:45 12 29 2 20 49 16:45 165 596 115 523 1119
05:00 17 10 17:00 115 126
05:15 10 13 17:15 136 137
05:30 15 12 17:30 122 106
05:45 33 75 18 53 128 17:45 134 507 118 487 994
06:00 21 16 18:00 126 120
06:15 33 22 18:15 137 105
06:30 48 35 18:30 104 97
06:45 65 167 31 104 271 18:45 100 467 95 417 884
07:00 45 28 19:00 76 90
07:15 55 41 19:15 71 126
07:30 57 53 19:30 71 104
07:45 93 250 63 185 435 19:45 56 274 114 434 708
08:00 63 71 20:00 46 79
08:15 70 88 20:15 41 80
08:30 76 93 20:30 43 67
08:45 135 344 97 349 693 20:45 48 178 60 286 464
09:00 103 121 21:00 36 38
09:15 129 108 21:15 43 32
09:30 121 153 21:30 30 36
09:45 148 501 133 515 1016 21:45 30 139 27 133 272
10:00 117 122 22:00 20 21
10:15 114 115 22:15 19 24
10:30 164 140 22:30 15 17
10:45 188 583 124 501 1084 22:45 12 66 13 75 141
11:00 175 132 23:00 11 9
11:15 225 154 23:15 5 6
11:30 180 143 23:30 5 4
11:45 187 767 133 562 1329 23:45 10 31 7 26 57
Total Vol.2820 2350 5170 4851 4795 9646
GPS Coordinates:
NB SB EB WB Combined
7671 7145 14816
Split %54.5% 45.5%34.9%50.3%49.7%65.1%
Peak Hour 10:45 11:45 11:15 12:15 12:30 12:30
Volume 768 589 1342 739 659 1391
P.H.F.0.85 0.91 0.89 0.92 0.96 0.96
Sunday, March 30, 2025 Project#25-1144-002
Prepared by: Field Data Services of Arizona/Veracity Traffic Group (520) 316-6745
Tangerine Rd east of Musette Dr
32.423887, -110.981012 Daily Totals
AM PM
DAY 4
Volumes for:City:Oro Valley
Location :
AM Period NL NR SB PM Period NL NR SB
00:00 0 0 0 12:00 2 5 3
00:15 0 0 0 12:15 3 1 8
00:30 0 0 0 12:30 4 4 6
00:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:45 2 11 2 12 5 22 45
01:00 0 0 0 13:00 0 4 9
01:15 0 0 0 13:15 4 2 4
01:30 0 0 0 13:30 2 2 19
01:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:45 2 8 4 12 5 37 57
02:00 0 0 0 14:00 2 2 4
02:15 0 0 0 14:15 1 5 5
02:30 0 0 0 14:30 1 2 9
02:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:45 5 9 1 10 6 24 43
03:00 0 0 0 15:00 3 1 7
03:15 0 0 0 15:15 3 4 9
03:30 0 0 0 15:30 2 2 13
03:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:45 2 10 2 9 11 40 59
04:00 0 0 0 16:00 0 3 10
04:15 0 0 0 16:15 4 5 9
04:30 1 0 0 16:30 1 1 21
04:45 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 16:45 1 6 5 14 42 82 102
05:00 1 0 1 17:00 3 1 36
05:15 0 0 3 17:15 4 3 23
05:30 2 0 2 17:30 3 2 19
05:45 2 5 0 0 1 7 12 17:45 5 15 6 12 40 118 145
06:00 2 3 1 18:00 7 13 33
06:15 3 1 3 18:15 18 12 26
06:30 2 1 3 18:30 13 11 11
06:45 3 10 0 5 4 11 26 18:45 8 46 6 42 18 88 176
07:00 4 3 6 19:00 7 12 22
07:15 1 3 8 19:15 12 13 22
07:30 2 1 11 19:30 22 14 13
07:45 6 13 0 7 7 32 52 19:45 15 56 10 49 9 66 171
08:00 1 2 13 20:00 1 5 11
08:15 3 1 8 20:15 14 1 9
08:30 1 5 10 20:30 5 4 17
08:45 5 10 2 10 2 33 53 20:45 19 39 13 23 7 44 106
09:00 1 5 9 21:00 2 3 8
09:15 4 2 13 21:15 2 2 7
09:30 2 6 8 21:30 1 0 6
09:45 1 8 7 20 9 39 67 21:45 0 5 0 5 4 25 35
10:00 1 8 5 22:00 12 6 1
10:15 4 5 2 22:15 0 0 3
10:30 2 1 8 22:30 0 0 1
10:45 4 11 6 20 3 18 49 22:45 0 12 0 6 0 5 23
11:00 5 5 9 23:00 2 0 1
11:15 1 5 7 23:15 0 0 3
11:30 0 1 6 23:30 0 0 0
11:45 2 8 3 14 5 27 49 23:45 0 2 0 0 1 5 7
Total Vol.66 76 167 309 219 194 556 969
GPS Coordinates:
NL NR SB Combined
285 270 723 1278
Split %21.4%24.6% 54.0%24.2%22.6%20.0%57.4%75.8%
Peak Hour 10:15 09:30 07:15 09:00 19:00 19:00 16:30 17:45
Volume 15 26 39 67 56 49 122 195
P.H.F.0.75 0.81 0.75 0.88 0.64 0.88 0.73 0.87
Prepared by: Field Data Services of Arizona/Veracity Traffic Group (520) 316-6745
Musette Dr south of Tangerine Rd
PM
Project#Thursday, March 27, 2025
AM
Daily Totals
25-1144-001
DAY 1
32.423570, -110.982115
Volumes for:City:Oro Valley
Location :
AM Period NL NR SB PM Period NL NR SB
00:00 1 0 0 12:00 3 2 7
00:15 0 0 0 12:15 0 4 8
00:30 0 0 0 12:30 1 2 4
00:45 0 1 0 0 1 1 2 12:45 2 6 7 15 3 22 43
01:00 0 0 0 13:00 0 5 9
01:15 0 0 0 13:15 2 5 8
01:30 0 0 0 13:30 1 2 9
01:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:45 1 4 1 13 8 34 51
02:00 0 0 0 14:00 5 1 13
02:15 0 0 0 14:15 0 2 12
02:30 0 0 0 14:30 7 1 8
02:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:45 8 20 6 10 12 45 75
03:00 0 0 0 15:00 5 6 14
03:15 0 0 0 15:15 6 4 15
03:30 0 0 0 15:30 4 10 8
03:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:45 1 16 2 22 17 54 92
04:00 0 0 0 16:00 2 4 20
04:15 1 0 0 16:15 2 3 10
04:30 0 1 0 16:30 5 3 20
04:45 1 2 0 1 0 0 3 16:45 4 13 3 13 39 89 115
05:00 0 0 1 17:00 2 7 24
05:15 1 1 1 17:15 2 5 20
05:30 0 0 2 17:30 1 4 28
05:45 1 2 1 2 1 5 9 17:45 7 12 13 29 41 113 154
06:00 4 1 2 18:00 8 7 24
06:15 2 0 5 18:15 8 10 20
06:30 4 1 6 18:30 6 12 16
06:45 1 11 3 5 4 17 33 18:45 6 28 5 34 14 74 136
07:00 5 2 6 19:00 8 5 18
07:15 1 4 8 19:15 17 25 11
07:30 2 2 11 19:30 6 10 7
07:45 4 12 2 10 16 41 63 19:45 9 40 8 48 13 49 137
08:00 3 2 8 20:00 1 5 9
08:15 1 4 11 20:15 10 4 4
08:30 5 5 17 20:30 2 7 3
08:45 2 11 8 19 11 47 77 20:45 5 18 2 18 4 20 56
09:00 1 6 6 21:00 5 5 4
09:15 1 0 10 21:15 2 1 3
09:30 3 7 6 21:30 0 4 2
09:45 4 9 2 15 6 28 52 21:45 0 7 0 10 2 11 28
10:00 4 2 6 22:00 1 2 5
10:15 4 6 10 22:15 0 0 4
10:30 4 2 3 22:30 0 0 1
10:45 4 16 4 14 14 33 63 22:45 2 3 0 2 2 12 17
11:00 4 4 7 23:00 0 0 1
11:15 4 4 8 23:15 0 0 1
11:30 2 4 7 23:30 0 0 1
11:45 2 12 4 16 4 26 54 23:45 0 0 0 0 1 4 4
Total Vol.76 82 198 356 167 214 527 908
GPS Coordinates:
NL NR SB Combined
243 296 725 1264
Split %21.3%23.0% 55.6%28.2%18.4%23.6%58.0%71.8%
Peak Hour 09:45 08:15 07:45 07:45 19:00 19:00 17:00 17:45
Volume 16 23 52 78 40 48 113 172
P.H.F.1.00 0.72 0.76 0.72 0.59 0.48 0.69 0.70
Prepared by: Field Data Services of Arizona/Veracity Traffic Group (520) 316-6745
DAY 2
32.423570, -110.982115
AM PM
Project#
Musette Dr south of Tangerine Rd
Friday, March 28, 2025 25-1144-001
Daily Totals
Volumes for:City:Oro Valley
Location :
AM Period NL NR SB PM Period NL NR SB
00:00 0 0 3 12:00 5 2 26
00:15 0 0 0 12:15 9 7 15
00:30 0 0 0 12:30 8 9 11
00:45 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 12:45 17 39 7 25 12 64 128
01:00 0 0 0 13:00 10 14 17
01:15 0 0 0 13:15 5 4 14
01:30 0 0 0 13:30 3 8 8
01:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:45 8 26 3 29 6 45 100
02:00 0 0 0 14:00 7 3 8
02:15 0 0 0 14:15 1 4 13
02:30 0 0 0 14:30 9 4 16
02:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:45 6 23 11 22 13 50 95
03:00 0 0 1 15:00 2 4 14
03:15 0 0 0 15:15 4 6 8
03:30 0 0 0 15:30 5 7 8
03:45 0 0 1 1 0 1 2 15:45 2 13 2 19 9 39 71
04:00 0 0 0 16:00 3 4 6
04:15 0 0 0 16:15 4 2 18
04:30 0 0 0 16:30 7 6 14
04:45 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 16:45 7 21 3 15 16 54 90
05:00 0 0 1 17:00 7 2 14
05:15 0 0 1 17:15 2 8 12
05:30 0 1 1 17:30 5 5 7
05:45 0 0 0 1 1 4 5 17:45 3 17 8 23 11 44 84
06:00 0 0 3 18:00 5 8 11
06:15 0 0 1 18:15 1 2 12
06:30 2 0 3 18:30 3 4 10
06:45 1 3 3 3 6 13 19 18:45 1 10 4 18 8 41 69
07:00 3 1 1 19:00 2 5 10
07:15 1 1 7 19:15 6 1 7
07:30 1 0 21 19:30 1 4 5
07:45 1 6 2 4 30 59 69 19:45 3 12 3 13 5 27 52
08:00 1 0 12 20:00 1 2 7
08:15 1 4 5 20:15 3 5 5
08:30 3 2 12 20:30 3 3 6
08:45 3 8 7 13 26 55 76 20:45 4 11 3 13 4 22 46
09:00 7 12 26 21:00 3 2 3
09:15 9 15 25 21:15 1 1 2
09:30 6 4 14 21:30 3 1 5
09:45 5 27 4 35 28 93 155 21:45 0 7 0 4 9 19 30
10:00 4 6 36 22:00 4 0 1
10:15 16 14 27 22:15 1 0 1
10:30 4 9 14 22:30 1 0 2
10:45 8 32 15 44 21 98 174 22:45 0 6 0 0 0 4 10
11:00 19 8 20 23:00 0 0 3
11:15 7 7 14 23:15 1 0 0
11:30 6 9 18 23:30 1 0 1
11:45 14 46 14 38 18 70 154 23:45 0 2 0 0 1 5 7
Total Vol.123 139 396 658 187 181 414 782
GPS Coordinates:
NL NR SB Combined
310 320 810 1440
Split %18.7%21.1% 60.2%45.7%23.9%23.1%52.9%54.3%
Peak Hour 10:15 10:15 09:30 10:15 12:15 12:15 12:00 12:15
Volume 47 46 105 175 44 37 64 136
P.H.F.0.62 0.77 0.73 0.77 0.65 0.66 0.62 0.83
Saturday, March 29, 2025 Project#25-1144-001
Prepared by: Field Data Services of Arizona/Veracity Traffic Group (520) 316-6745
Musette Dr south of Tangerine Rd
32.423570, -110.982115 Daily Totals
AM PM
DAY 3
Volumes for:City:Oro Valley
Location :
AM Period NL NR SB PM Period NL NR SB
00:00 0 0 1 12:00 4 5 21
00:15 0 0 1 12:15 4 4 11
00:30 0 0 0 12:30 4 5 16
00:45 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 12:45 4 16 4 18 19 67 101
01:00 0 0 0 13:00 2 6 16
01:15 0 0 0 13:15 5 4 10
01:30 0 0 0 13:30 3 4 14
01:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:45 4 14 9 23 8 48 85
02:00 0 0 0 14:00 2 5 17
02:15 0 0 0 14:15 5 5 8
02:30 0 0 0 14:30 6 6 12
02:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:45 3 16 7 23 8 45 84
03:00 0 0 0 15:00 1 3 9
03:15 0 0 0 15:15 7 2 15
03:30 0 0 0 15:30 3 6 20
03:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:45 4 15 4 15 10 54 84
04:00 0 0 0 16:00 7 7 13
04:15 1 0 0 16:15 2 3 12
04:30 0 0 0 16:30 4 1 7
04:45 1 2 0 0 1 1 3 16:45 5 18 5 16 9 41 75
05:00 0 0 1 17:00 3 4 8
05:15 0 1 0 17:15 3 3 14
05:30 0 0 1 17:30 3 6 3
05:45 0 0 0 1 0 2 3 17:45 2 11 6 19 13 38 68
06:00 1 0 1 18:00 4 8 11
06:15 0 1 1 18:15 4 6 16
06:30 1 0 6 18:30 4 2 11
06:45 3 5 1 2 4 12 19 18:45 6 18 9 25 7 45 88
07:00 0 1 4 19:00 2 2 9
07:15 0 6 6 19:15 2 3 10
07:30 1 1 7 19:30 1 4 8
07:45 1 2 0 8 10 27 37 19:45 3 8 0 9 7 34 51
08:00 6 0 9 20:00 3 3 5
08:15 2 3 8 20:15 2 1 5
08:30 4 1 3 20:30 1 1 9
08:45 1 13 3 7 12 32 52 20:45 3 9 7 12 3 22 43
09:00 1 5 9 21:00 0 1 0
09:15 5 5 11 21:15 0 3 2
09:30 2 2 16 21:30 4 5 3
09:45 8 16 5 17 8 44 77 21:45 1 5 1 10 2 7 22
10:00 2 7 11 22:00 2 3 0
10:15 5 3 9 22:15 0 0 2
10:30 9 6 11 22:30 1 0 1
10:45 6 22 3 19 15 46 87 22:45 0 3 0 3 3 6 12
11:00 4 6 8 23:00 0 0 0
11:15 7 4 12 23:15 0 0 2
11:30 5 9 17 23:30 0 0 0
11:45 3 19 3 22 9 46 87 23:45 0 0 0 0 0 2 2
Total Vol.79 76 212 367 133 173 409 715
GPS Coordinates:
NL NR SB Combined
212 249 621 1082
Split %21.5%20.7% 57.8%33.9%18.6%24.2%57.2%66.1%
Peak Hour 10:30 10:45 11:15 11:15 15:15 17:30 12:00 12:00
Volume 26 22 59 99 21 26 67 101
P.H.F.0.72 0.61 0.70 0.80 0.75 0.81 0.80 0.84
Sunday, March 30, 2025 Project#25-1144-001
Prepared by: Field Data Services of Arizona/Veracity Traffic Group (520) 316-6745
Musette Dr south of Tangerine Rd
32.423570, -110.982115 Daily Totals
AM PM
DAY 4
Intersection Turning Movement
Prepared by:
N-S STREET:Musette Dr DATE:03/27/25 LOCATION: Oro Valley
E-W STREET:Tangerine Rd DAY:THURSDAY PROJECT#
NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL
LANES:1 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 2 0
12:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 7 0 12
12:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 5 0 15
12:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 0 5
12:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 2 0 7
1:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 8
1:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 5 0 12
1:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 7 0 9
1:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 4
2:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 10
2:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 0 5
2:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 8
2:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 6
3:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 6
3:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 7 0 10
3:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 5 0 9
3:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 7 0 13
4:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 13 0 27
4:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 15 0 27
4:30 AM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 15 0 38
4:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 0 0 23 0 57
5:00 AM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 0 1 29 0 63
5:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 1 2 48 0 87
5:30 AM 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 58 0 2 38 0 100
5:45 AM 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 125 0 1 57 0 185
6:00 AM 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 89 1 0 55 0 150
6:15 AM 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 101 3 0 46 0 154
6:30 AM 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 141 1 2 73 0 220
6:45 AM 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 187 2 2 92 0 286
7:00 AM 4 0 3 0 0 0 0 201 1 5 137 0 351
7:15 AM 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 247 2 6 172 0 431
7:30 AM 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 297 3 8 206 0 517
7:45 AM 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 270 5 2 167 0 450
8:00 AM 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 223 9 4 127 0 366
8:15 AM 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 230 5 3 145 0 387
8:30 AM 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 231 5 5 172 0 419
8:45 AM 5 0 2 0 0 0 0 239 1 1 154 0 402
9:00 AM 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 189 3 6 145 0 349
9:15 AM 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 175 3 10 128 0 322
9:30 AM 2 0 6 0 0 0 0 166 3 5 146 0 328
9:45 AM 1 0 7 0 0 0 0 224 1 8 161 0 402
10:00 AM 1 0 8 0 0 0 0 179 4 1 121 0 314
10:15 AM 4 0 5 0 0 0 0 187 1 1 165 0 363
10:30 AM 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 189 2 6 158 0 358
10:45 AM 4 0 6 0 0 0 0 208 1 2 161 0 382
11:00 AM 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 164 4 5 168 0 351
11:15 AM 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 197 5 2 184 0 394
11:30 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 209 2 4 178 0 394
11:45 AM 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 199 4 1 149 0 358
12:00 PM 2 0 5 0 0 0 0 229 1 2 168 0 407
12:15 PM 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 199 5 3 162 0 373
12:30 PM 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 160 1 5 187 0 361
12:45 PM 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 201 1 4 203 0 413
1:00 PM 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 176 5 4 206 0 395
1:15 PM 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 178 1 3 182 0 370
1:30 PM 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 202 14 5 172 0 397
1:45 PM 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 191 2 3 191 0 393
2:00 PM 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 183 0 4 204 0 395
2:15 PM 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 186 1 4 227 0 424
2:30 PM 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 206 5 4 224 0 442
2:45 PM 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 248 1 5 234 0 494
3:00 PM 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 226 3 4 217 0 454
3:15 PM 3 0 4 0 0 0 0 221 3 6 259 0 496
3:30 PM 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 205 7 6 216 0 438
3:45 PM 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 234 6 5 248 0 497
4:00 PM 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 175 4 6 238 0 426
4:15 PM 4 0 5 0 0 0 0 221 4 5 237 0 476
4:30 PM 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 218 11 10 228 0 469
4:45 PM 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 175 29 13 211 0 434
5:00 PM 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 193 24 12 233 0 466
5:15 PM 4 0 3 0 0 0 0 198 13 10 237 0 465
5:30 PM 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 171 14 5 188 0 383
5:45 PM 5 0 6 0 0 0 0 176 26 14 168 0 395
6:00 PM 7 0 13 0 0 0 0 169 21 12 153 0 375
6:15 PM 18 0 12 0 0 0 0 161 20 6 164 0 381
6:30 PM 13 0 11 0 0 0 0 133 5 6 129 0 297
6:45 PM 8 0 6 0 0 0 0 140 9 9 126 0 298
7:00 PM 7 0 12 0 0 0 0 98 12 10 108 0 247
7:15 PM 12 0 13 0 0 0 0 84 12 10 93 0 224
7:30 PM 22 0 14 0 0 0 0 85 8 5 113 0 247
7:45 PM 15 0 10 0 0 0 0 60 5 4 79 0 173
8:00 PM 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 58 9 2 95 0 170
8:15 PM 14 0 1 0 0 0 0 59 5 4 77 0 160
8:30 PM 5 0 4 0 0 0 0 73 5 12 57 0 156
8:45 PM 19 0 13 0 0 0 0 41 6 1 58 0 138
9:00 PM 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 40 1 7 51 0 104
9:15 PM 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 33 3 4 39 0 83
9:30 PM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 3 3 34 0 86
9:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 2 2 31 0 73
10:00 PM 12 0 6 0 0 0 0 16 0 1 34 0 69
10:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 1 2 23 0 54
10:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 1 0 28 0 54
10:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 14 0 32
11:00 PM 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 1 0 15 0 26
11:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 3 0 16 0 27
11:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 8 0 23
11:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 1 10 0 18
TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL
Volumes 285 0 270 0 0 0 0 11355 385 338 10316 0 22949
Approach %51.35 0.00 48.65 ############0.00 96.72 3.28 3.17 96.83 0.00
App/Depart 555 /0 0 /723 11740 /11625 10654 /10601
230 PM
PEAK
Volumes 12 0 8 0 0 0 0 901 12 19 934 0 1886
Approach %60.00 0.00 40.00 ############0.00 98.69 1.31 1.99 98.01 0.00
PEAK HR.
FACTOR:0.951
32.423874, -110.982118
1-Way Stop (NB)
COMMENT 1:
GPS:
CONTROL:
25-1144-004
Peak Hr Begins at:
0.899
WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
0.000 0.9170.714
veracity grouptraffic
Volumes for:City:Oro Valley
Location :
AM Period NL NR EB WB PM Period NL NR EB WB
00:00 0 0 13 10 12:00 2 2 154 205
00:15 0 0 9 7 12:15 2 1 212 246
00:30 0 0 6 4 12:30 3 5 180 187
00:45 0 0 0 0 6 34 7 28 62 12:45 6 13 1 9 160 706 203 841 1569
01:00 0 0 3 8 13:00 7 2 157 208
01:15 0 0 5 6 13:15 6 3 161 204
01:30 0 0 3 10 13:30 5 2 192 173
01:45 0 0 0 0 9 20 3 27 47 13:45 3 21 3 10 199 709 169 754 1494
02:00 0 0 7 2 14:00 1 3 153 214
02:15 0 0 7 3 14:15 1 4 161 192
02:30 0 0 11 5 14:30 2 2 185 217
02:45 0 0 0 0 5 30 5 15 45 14:45 2 6 2 11 185 684 207 830 1531
03:00 0 0 3 8 15:00 1 2 189 209
03:15 0 0 3 10 15:15 5 2 162 210
03:30 0 0 6 11 15:30 2 5 171 206
03:45 0 0 0 0 16 28 13 42 70 15:45 4 12 3 12 167 689 212 837 1550
04:00 0 2 11 10 16:00 1 3 159 250
04:15 0 0 27 19 16:15 1 2 156 223
04:30 0 0 32 20 16:30 5 4 180 245
04:45 0 0 0 2 55 125 37 86 213 16:45 3 10 1 10 182 677 183 901 1598
05:00 0 1 47 31 17:00 4 4 150 225
05:15 0 1 57 36 17:15 3 2 161 219
05:30 1 3 88 44 17:30 4 2 150 200
05:45 0 1 4 9 138 330 56 167 507 17:45 3 14 2 10 153 614 168 812 1450
06:00 0 2 93 56 18:00 5 4 127 195
06:15 2 6 99 66 18:15 4 2 107 145
06:30 3 3 164 77 18:30 5 6 103 143
06:45 3 8 7 18 185 541 80 279 846 18:45 3 17 3 15 101 438 121 604 1074
07:00 2 2 164 106 19:00 4 9 88 134
07:15 2 1 204 65 19:15 6 8 86 106
07:30 1 10 222 116 19:30 8 10 73 117
07:45 2 7 5 18 228 818 104 391 1234 19:45 5 23 13 40 81 328 124 481 872
08:00 4 3 208 107 20:00 5 14 62 120
08:15 3 5 185 93 20:15 5 3 67 88
08:30 4 4 203 126 20:30 4 7 53 101
08:45 4 15 3 15 197 793 125 451 1274 20:45 3 17 6 30 57 239 83 392 678
09:00 2 1 191 131 21:00 2 3 43 87
09:15 3 2 180 128 21:15 3 5 48 70
09:30 6 5 202 126 21:30 1 4 45 72
09:45 5 16 2 10 195 768 145 530 1324 21:45 1 7 2 14 36 172 61 290 483
10:00 1 2 159 163 22:00 7 3 28 50
10:15 2 3 156 142 22:15 0 1 23 53
10:30 3 3 203 140 22:30 0 1 18 60
10:45 2 8 2 10 207 725 139 584 1327 22:45 0 7 0 5 25 94 43 206 312
11:00 3 0 191 170 23:00 0 0 11 49
11:15 6 2 186 144 23:15 0 0 14 36
11:30 2 1 205 163 23:30 1 0 11 38
11:45 3 14 5 8 173 755 167 644 1421 23:45 0 1 0 0 7 43 21 144 188
Total Vol.69 90 4967 3244 8370 148 166 5393 7092 12799
GPS Coordinates:
NL NR EB WB Combined
217 256 10360 10336 21169
Split %0.8%1.1%59.3% 38.8%39.5%1.2%1.3%42.1%55.4%60.5%
Peak Hour 09:00 07:30 07:15 11:45 11:45 12:45 19:15 14:30 15:45 15:45
Volume 16 23 862 805 1547 24 45 721 930 1615
P.H.F.0.67 0.58 0.95 0.82 0.84 0.86 0.80 0.95 0.93 0.93
PM
Musette Dr & Tangerine Rd (Approaches)
DAY 1
AM
Daily Totals32.423871, -110.982127
Prepared by: Field Data Services of Arizona/Veracity Traffic Group (520) 316-6745
Project#Tuesday, June 24, 2025 25-1347-001
Volumes for:City:Oro Valley
Location :
AM Period NL NR EB WB PM Period NL NR EB WB
00:00 0 0 11 5 12:00 1 2 151 214
00:15 0 0 4 6 12:15 4 1 178 200
00:30 0 0 7 10 12:30 2 0 166 220
00:45 0 0 0 0 9 31 5 26 57 12:45 1 8 2 5 167 662 182 816 1491
01:00 0 1 6 4 13:00 2 1 164 229
01:15 0 0 5 2 13:15 3 2 176 195
01:30 0 0 3 10 13:30 1 5 161 191
01:45 0 0 0 1 0 14 4 20 35 13:45 4 10 5 13 170 671 196 811 1505
02:00 0 0 5 7 14:00 3 2 156 210
02:15 0 0 1 1 14:15 4 3 163 211
02:30 0 0 4 4 14:30 0 3 145 224
02:45 0 0 0 0 1 11 2 14 25 14:45 1 8 0 8 188 652 203 848 1516
03:00 0 0 9 9 15:00 1 4 156 246
03:15 0 0 5 8 15:15 2 4 174 206
03:30 0 0 8 9 15:30 0 1 163 222
03:45 0 0 0 0 12 34 15 41 75 15:45 2 5 2 11 173 666 230 904 1586
04:00 0 2 9 8 16:00 3 1 163 239
04:15 0 1 25 17 16:15 5 4 177 228
04:30 0 1 33 24 16:30 1 1 162 228
04:45 1 1 0 4 39 106 31 80 191 16:45 3 12 0 6 191 693 201 896 1607
05:00 0 0 38 21 17:00 7 2 146 244
05:15 0 0 52 36 17:15 1 3 144 225
05:30 0 2 84 54 17:30 1 2 160 170
05:45 0 0 1 3 142 316 50 161 480 17:45 2 11 5 12 138 588 158 797 1408
06:00 0 3 102 57 18:00 4 4 127 156
06:15 0 4 112 52 18:15 6 4 112 154
06:30 2 4 154 88 18:30 3 7 98 129
06:45 1 3 6 17 206 574 84 281 875 18:45 2 15 2 17 91 428 112 551 1011
07:00 1 2 165 90 19:00 3 8 69 130
07:15 1 5 174 103 19:15 4 10 73 123
07:30 2 6 225 92 19:30 6 5 58 123
07:45 3 7 8 21 232 796 110 395 1219 19:45 9 22 5 28 77 277 96 472 799
08:00 2 4 181 109 20:00 6 6 84 101
08:15 5 8 221 119 20:15 5 4 73 99
08:30 4 8 207 134 20:30 7 5 55 90
08:45 2 13 3 23 209 818 140 502 1356 20:45 3 21 5 20 51 263 87 377 681
09:00 6 5 180 131 21:00 0 3 35 73
09:15 2 1 193 144 21:15 3 3 26 66
09:30 6 2 189 125 21:30 0 3 36 55
09:45 5 19 1 9 208 770 143 543 1341 21:45 2 5 4 13 46 143 52 246 407
10:00 5 2 189 117 22:00 1 7 29 56
10:15 6 4 157 135 22:15 0 0 20 48
10:30 2 2 204 149 22:30 0 0 25 61
10:45 1 14 1 9 183 733 150 551 1307 22:45 0 1 0 7 22 96 53 218 322
11:00 2 5 204 153 23:00 3 1 15 46
11:15 6 3 183 186 23:15 2 0 13 38
11:30 2 1 174 167 23:30 0 0 8 42
11:45 3 13 2 11 191 752 206 712 1488 23:45 0 5 0 1 9 45 35 161 212
Total Vol.70 98 4955 3326 8449 123 141 5184 7097 12545
GPS Coordinates:
NL NR EB WB Combined
193 239 10139 10423 20994
Split %0.8%1.2%58.6% 39.4%40.2%1.0%1.1%41.3%56.6%59.8%
Peak Hour 09:30 07:45 07:30 11:45 11:45 19:45 19:00 16:00 15:45 15:45
Volume 22 28 859 840 1541 27 28 693 925 1619
P.H.F.0.92 0.88 0.93 0.95 0.96 0.75 0.70 0.91 0.97 0.98
32.423871, -110.982127
DAY 2
Prepared by: Field Data Services of Arizona/Veracity Traffic Group (520) 316-6745
AM PM
Project#
Musette Dr & Tangerine Rd (Approaches)
Wednesday, June 25, 2025 25-1347-001
Daily Totals
Volumes for:City:Oro Valley
Location :
AM Period NL NR EB WB PM Period NL NR EB WB
00:00 0 0 7 13 12:00 4 5 148 184
00:15 0 1 14 8 12:15 4 1 180 219
00:30 0 0 2 12 12:30 5 0 196 206
00:45 0 0 0 1 2 25 3 36 62 12:45 6 19 0 6 191 715 181 790 1530
01:00 0 0 3 3 13:00 5 3 181 173
01:15 0 0 6 1 13:15 4 3 175 223
01:30 0 0 5 10 13:30 6 3 159 199
01:45 0 0 0 0 2 16 3 17 33 13:45 2 17 2 11 169 684 191 786 1498
02:00 0 1 8 6 14:00 3 3 159 200
02:15 0 0 9 4 14:15 2 1 162 205
02:30 0 0 7 5 14:30 2 5 161 202
02:45 0 0 0 1 4 28 4 19 48 14:45 1 8 5 14 168 650 213 820 1492
03:00 0 0 2 13 15:00 2 2 165 225
03:15 0 0 10 15 15:15 3 4 195 210
03:30 0 0 10 2 15:30 0 0 166 212
03:45 0 0 0 0 11 33 14 44 77 15:45 1 6 3 9 169 695 196 843 1553
04:00 0 3 16 18 16:00 4 1 149 209
04:15 0 0 14 20 16:15 1 2 189 221
04:30 0 0 33 22 16:30 1 0 166 214
04:45 0 0 0 3 40 103 22 82 188 16:45 2 8 1 4 175 679 216 860 1551
05:00 0 0 49 30 17:00 1 4 154 230
05:15 0 2 42 36 17:15 4 2 136 204
05:30 0 1 95 43 17:30 1 1 150 172
05:45 0 0 3 6 128 314 50 159 479 17:45 4 10 2 9 146 586 159 765 1370
06:00 0 3 98 50 18:00 3 6 114 185
06:15 0 1 120 68 18:15 1 0 127 150
06:30 2 3 142 81 18:30 6 6 106 166
06:45 5 7 3 10 196 556 80 279 852 18:45 3 13 1 13 99 446 132 633 1105
07:00 0 1 178 106 19:00 1 6 95 162
07:15 0 2 150 105 19:15 4 4 77 119
07:30 1 1 234 117 19:30 7 17 85 121
07:45 3 4 5 9 239 801 153 481 1295 19:45 4 16 11 38 68 325 116 518 897
08:00 1 5 189 121 20:00 6 15 65 116
08:15 3 3 183 145 20:15 0 3 54 107
08:30 3 5 206 130 20:30 2 5 73 89
08:45 3 10 4 17 225 803 115 511 1341 20:45 6 14 12 35 43 235 87 399 683
09:00 2 2 175 163 21:00 12 6 47 69
09:15 6 0 196 132 21:15 5 2 51 69
09:30 2 3 212 178 21:30 3 3 47 70
09:45 2 12 2 7 188 771 172 645 1435 21:45 2 22 4 15 44 189 56 264 490
10:00 3 4 180 169 22:00 4 1 29 46
10:15 3 3 172 220 22:15 2 0 31 57
10:30 6 1 191 160 22:30 1 0 19 61
10:45 5 17 3 11 190 733 153 702 1463 22:45 3 10 1 2 27 106 45 209 327
11:00 6 4 213 152 23:00 2 0 24 51
11:15 7 1 155 183 23:15 0 1 14 49
11:30 4 5 201 176 23:30 1 1 11 43
11:45 2 19 0 10 186 755 153 664 1448 23:45 1 4 0 2 8 57 42 185 248
Total Vol.69 75 4938 3639 8721 147 158 5367 7072 12744
GPS Coordinates:
NL NR EB WB Combined
216 233 10305 10711 21465
Split %0.8%0.9%56.6% 41.7%40.6%1.2%1.2%42.1%55.5%59.4%
Peak Hour 10:30 07:45 07:30 11:45 09:30 20:45 19:15 12:15 16:15 16:15
Volume 24 18 845 762 1513 26 47 748 881 1577
P.H.F.0.86 0.90 0.88 0.87 0.95 0.54 0.69 0.95 0.96 0.95
Prepared by: Field Data Services of Arizona/Veracity Traffic Group (520) 316-6745
Daily Totals
AM PM
DAY 3
32.423871, -110.982127
Thursday, June 26, 2025 Project#25-1347-001
Musette Dr & Tangerine Rd (Approaches)
Volumes for:City:Oro Valley
Location :
AM Period NL NR EB WB PM Period NL NR EB WB
00:00 0 0 10 9 12:00 2 0 173 202
00:15 0 0 5 5 12:15 2 4 181 254
00:30 0 0 8 4 12:30 0 3 182 213
00:45 0 0 0 0 6 29 5 23 52 12:45 1 5 1 8 191 727 223 892 1632
01:00 0 0 2 4 13:00 3 3 181 209
01:15 0 0 6 4 13:15 3 1 173 207
01:30 0 0 2 3 13:30 3 6 173 189
01:45 0 0 0 0 3 13 4 15 28 13:45 4 13 2 12 164 691 190 795 1511
02:00 0 0 1 4 14:00 2 0 160 194
02:15 0 0 6 6 14:15 1 2 165 211
02:30 0 0 7 6 14:30 2 3 184 228
02:45 0 0 0 0 3 17 8 24 41 14:45 0 5 2 7 170 679 215 848 1539
03:00 0 0 2 7 15:00 3 2 158 201
03:15 0 0 4 9 15:15 5 2 148 202
03:30 0 0 9 10 15:30 2 2 145 222
03:45 0 0 0 0 12 27 13 39 66 15:45 1 11 3 9 168 619 175 800 1439
04:00 0 1 16 6 16:00 1 2 150 214
04:15 0 0 28 22 16:15 1 1 169 212
04:30 0 1 34 20 16:30 5 6 183 195
04:45 1 1 0 2 44 122 17 65 190 16:45 1 8 1 10 168 670 190 811 1499
05:00 0 0 31 23 17:00 4 2 165 215
05:15 0 0 46 24 17:15 2 1 152 166
05:30 0 1 78 52 17:30 3 1 186 175
05:45 0 0 3 4 113 268 37 136 408 17:45 4 13 3 7 131 634 175 731 1385
06:00 0 1 84 51 18:00 2 1 143 147
06:15 0 3 100 49 18:15 3 3 124 125
06:30 1 4 137 63 18:30 3 2 119 130
06:45 1 2 4 12 194 515 63 226 755 18:45 2 10 3 9 98 484 126 528 1031
07:00 3 5 172 90 19:00 0 5 81 131
07:15 0 5 180 114 19:15 3 1 84 111
07:30 3 4 168 113 19:30 2 3 70 118
07:45 3 9 4 18 238 758 124 441 1226 19:45 1 6 2 11 84 319 120 480 816
08:00 5 5 204 128 20:00 7 6 64 103
08:15 6 1 192 137 20:15 3 5 53 106
08:30 7 6 205 148 20:30 2 4 53 103
08:45 2 20 3 15 244 845 137 550 1430 20:45 0 12 3 18 54 224 100 412 666
09:00 1 3 193 164 21:00 6 1 37 85
09:15 3 2 167 157 21:15 1 1 58 86
09:30 4 1 201 169 21:30 2 2 51 74
09:45 2 10 3 9 171 732 153 643 1394 21:45 0 9 0 4 34 180 69 314 507
10:00 6 3 200 197 22:00 5 6 45 75
10:15 6 3 179 195 22:15 0 1 28 67
10:30 4 3 171 169 22:30 2 1 26 67
10:45 2 18 2 11 193 743 164 725 1497 22:45 0 7 0 8 24 123 52 261 399
11:00 5 7 189 210 23:00 0 0 24 50
11:15 3 4 178 178 23:15 1 2 16 45
11:30 4 4 180 187 23:30 3 0 14 46
11:45 6 18 4 19 198 745 204 779 1561 23:45 0 4 0 2 15 69 42 183 258
Total Vol.78 90 4814 3666 8648 103 105 5419 7055 12682
GPS Coordinates:
NL NR EB WB Combined
181 195 10233 10721 21330
Split %0.9%1.0%55.7% 42.4%40.5%0.8%0.8%42.7%55.6%59.5%
Peak Hour 07:45 11:00 08:00 11:45 11:45 13:00 20:00 12:15 12:15 12:15
Volume 21 19 845 873 1628 13 18 735 899 1651
P.H.F.0.75 0.68 0.87 0.86 0.92 0.81 0.75 0.96 0.88 0.94
Prepared by: Field Data Services of Arizona/Veracity Traffic Group (520) 316-6745
Daily Totals
AM PM
DAY 4
32.423871, -110.982127
Friday, June 27, 2025 Project#25-1347-001
Musette Dr & Tangerine Rd (Approaches)
Volumes for:City:Oro Valley
Location :
AM Period NL NR EB WB PM Period NL NR EB WB
00:00 0 0 14 7 12:00 2 2 165 180
00:15 0 0 9 14 12:15 5 4 150 217
00:30 0 1 5 6 12:30 3 3 174 169
00:45 0 0 0 1 10 38 7 34 73 12:45 3 13 3 12 148 637 176 742 1404
01:00 0 0 8 2 13:00 2 3 145 152
01:15 0 0 6 6 13:15 5 2 143 165
01:30 0 0 8 5 13:30 2 6 138 165
01:45 0 0 0 0 7 29 6 19 48 13:45 3 12 3 14 165 591 154 636 1253
02:00 0 0 6 1 14:00 3 1 162 164
02:15 0 0 7 3 14:15 6 2 115 179
02:30 0 0 4 7 14:30 1 6 135 166
02:45 0 0 0 0 1 18 2 13 31 14:45 5 15 6 15 126 538 153 662 1230
03:00 0 0 8 5 15:00 2 1 135 145
03:15 0 0 3 5 15:15 4 1 155 139
03:30 0 0 5 1 15:30 6 5 162 156
03:45 0 0 1 1 7 23 5 16 40 15:45 2 14 4 11 159 611 168 608 1244
04:00 0 0 8 5 16:00 6 2 120 144
04:15 0 0 6 9 16:15 1 4 128 146
04:30 0 0 18 8 16:30 3 2 141 113
04:45 0 0 0 0 26 58 13 35 93 16:45 1 11 1 9 162 551 146 549 1120
05:00 1 1 20 16 17:00 4 2 180 129
05:15 0 1 19 19 17:15 2 2 159 148
05:30 0 0 38 20 17:30 2 2 108 130
05:45 1 2 1 3 53 130 23 78 213 17:45 3 11 0 6 111 558 123 530 1105
06:00 2 1 42 25 18:00 1 2 92 141
06:15 1 1 61 41 18:15 3 4 133 135
06:30 1 2 63 48 18:30 2 1 117 117
06:45 2 6 1 5 90 256 46 160 427 18:45 1 7 4 11 115 457 121 514 989
07:00 2 3 84 52 19:00 3 0 96 113
07:15 0 2 87 63 19:15 1 2 70 119
07:30 6 6 105 74 19:30 6 2 72 106
07:45 2 10 4 15 126 402 72 261 688 19:45 5 15 1 5 100 338 111 449 807
08:00 2 5 97 57 20:00 2 6 65 95
08:15 3 7 117 76 20:15 3 4 85 112
08:30 4 7 132 105 20:30 3 0 63 107
08:45 2 11 6 25 144 490 93 331 857 20:45 2 10 5 15 75 288 93 407 720
09:00 2 3 135 98 21:00 1 0 59 93
09:15 3 4 137 98 21:15 5 3 50 83
09:30 2 2 141 120 21:30 2 2 44 72
09:45 4 11 5 14 165 578 117 433 1036 21:45 2 10 2 7 51 204 68 316 537
10:00 2 3 147 120 22:00 4 7 37 74
10:15 2 2 156 143 22:15 0 1 36 67
10:30 6 5 167 148 22:30 2 2 38 65
10:45 5 15 1 11 179 649 138 549 1224 22:45 0 6 1 11 36 147 57 263 427
11:00 2 4 157 147 23:00 0 0 34 48
11:15 6 4 146 166 23:15 0 2 25 49
11:30 6 2 149 171 23:30 0 0 35 51
11:45 6 20 1 11 151 603 147 631 1265 23:45 0 0 0 2 24 118 42 190 310
Total Vol.75 86 3274 2560 5995 124 118 5038 5866 11146
GPS Coordinates:
NL NR EB WB Combined
199 204 8312 8426 17141
Split %1.3%1.4%54.6% 42.7%35.0%1.1%1.1%45.2%52.6%65.0%
Peak Hour 11:00 08:00 10:15 11:30 11:45 15:15 14:00 16:30 12:00 12:00
Volume 20 25 659 715 1379 18 15 642 742 1404
P.H.F.0.83 0.89 0.92 0.82 0.92 0.75 0.63 0.89 0.85 0.93
Prepared by: Field Data Services of Arizona/Veracity Traffic Group (520) 316-6745
Daily Totals
AM PM
DAY 5
32.423871, -110.982127
Saturday, June 28, 2025 Project#25-1347-001
Musette Dr & Tangerine Rd (Approaches)
Volumes for:City:Oro Valley
Location :
AM Period NL NR EB WB PM Period NL NR EB WB
00:00 0 0 14 6 12:00 1 0 139 166
00:15 0 0 10 9 12:15 2 1 142 155
00:30 0 1 9 6 12:30 1 3 150 140
00:45 0 0 0 1 15 48 3 24 73 12:45 2 6 3 7 124 555 153 614 1182
01:00 0 0 7 5 13:00 4 3 155 148
01:15 0 0 13 6 13:15 1 0 135 149
01:30 0 0 9 9 13:30 1 2 145 148
01:45 0 0 0 0 1 30 5 25 55 13:45 0 6 0 5 137 572 137 582 1165
02:00 0 0 3 3 14:00 1 3 125 127
02:15 0 0 3 7 14:15 2 0 130 148
02:30 0 0 4 2 14:30 1 1 120 141
02:45 0 0 0 0 3 13 2 14 27 14:45 2 6 6 10 115 490 125 541 1047
03:00 0 0 3 2 15:00 1 3 122 119
03:15 0 0 3 2 15:15 1 6 109 118
03:30 0 0 4 4 15:30 2 1 124 142
03:45 0 0 0 0 4 14 4 12 26 15:45 6 10 5 15 120 475 121 500 1000
04:00 0 0 7 3 16:00 6 1 114 120
04:15 0 0 8 8 16:15 1 0 104 136
04:30 0 0 16 5 16:30 3 3 98 137
04:45 0 0 0 0 19 50 6 22 72 16:45 0 10 3 7 128 444 133 526 987
05:00 0 2 11 16 17:00 1 1 130 128
05:15 0 1 10 15 17:15 5 3 112 117
05:30 0 0 21 19 17:30 3 2 104 112
05:45 1 1 1 4 33 75 17 67 147 17:45 2 11 2 8 88 434 119 476 929
06:00 0 0 25 26 18:00 1 2 102 128
06:15 0 2 42 29 18:15 3 1 100 113
06:30 2 3 48 36 18:30 1 0 97 102
06:45 2 4 2 7 79 194 35 126 331 18:45 0 5 4 7 88 387 119 462 861
07:00 2 2 51 32 19:00 4 2 76 96
07:15 1 4 58 39 19:15 4 6 77 98
07:30 3 1 68 54 19:30 0 8 78 103
07:45 3 9 0 7 93 270 56 181 467 19:45 3 11 4 20 65 296 112 409 736
08:00 2 5 72 54 20:00 3 2 67 108
08:15 2 4 93 61 20:15 4 7 66 74
08:30 3 4 100 73 20:30 4 5 61 71
08:45 5 12 2 15 89 354 84 272 653 20:45 1 12 2 16 44 238 74 327 593
09:00 2 3 87 96 21:00 1 3 47 74
09:15 5 0 91 128 21:15 1 6 46 74
09:30 2 1 110 141 21:30 1 0 47 53
09:45 1 10 3 7 129 417 139 504 938 21:45 0 3 0 9 46 186 47 248 446
10:00 3 6 98 110 22:00 5 3 47 60
10:15 1 4 112 109 22:15 0 1 26 50
10:30 6 1 136 145 22:30 3 1 35 45
10:45 1 11 1 12 182 528 134 498 1049 22:45 1 9 0 5 25 133 43 198 345
11:00 1 1 160 130 23:00 0 0 25 40
11:15 6 1 171 142 23:15 1 2 20 35
11:30 5 2 172 123 23:30 0 0 25 42
11:45 2 14 1 5 139 642 138 533 1194 23:45 0 1 0 2 18 88 39 156 247
Total Vol.61 58 2635 2278 5032 90 111 4298 5039 9538
GPS Coordinates:
NL NR EB WB Combined
151 169 6933 7317 14570
Split %1.2%1.2%52.4% 45.3%34.5%0.9%1.2%45.1%52.8%65.5%
Peak Hour 08:30 08:00 10:45 11:45 10:45 15:45 19:30 13:00 12:00 12:15
Volume 15 15 685 599 1232 16 21 572 614 1186
P.H.F.0.75 0.75 0.94 0.90 0.96 0.67 0.66 0.92 0.92 0.96
Prepared by: Field Data Services of Arizona/Veracity Traffic Group (520) 316-6745
Daily Totals
AM PM
DAY 6
32.423871, -110.982127
Sunday, June 29, 2025 Project#25-1347-001
Musette Dr & Tangerine Rd (Approaches)
Volumes for:City:Oro Valley
Location :
AM Period NL NR EB WB PM Period NL NR EB WB
00:00 1 0 8 8 12:00 2 1 173 174
00:15 2 0 7 10 12:15 1 2 203 187
00:30 0 0 0 4 12:30 6 1 191 180
00:45 0 3 1 1 2 17 5 27 48 12:45 2 11 2 6 188 755 179 720 1492
01:00 0 0 2 4 13:00 5 3 165 182
01:15 0 0 4 2 13:15 1 2 183 177
01:30 1 0 4 2 13:30 2 2 181 163
01:45 0 1 0 0 3 13 1 9 23 13:45 4 12 2 9 208 737 179 701 1459
02:00 0 0 3 4 14:00 4 1 177 187
02:15 0 0 6 1 14:15 1 0 178 197
02:30 0 0 5 6 14:30 3 3 166 185
02:45 0 0 0 0 1 15 3 14 29 14:45 3 11 1 5 203 724 215 784 1524
03:00 0 0 5 4 15:00 1 1 172 199
03:15 0 0 7 8 15:15 3 2 164 188
03:30 0 0 11 7 15:30 1 3 155 216
03:45 0 0 0 0 15 38 8 27 65 15:45 1 6 1 7 185 676 191 794 1483
04:00 0 1 16 9 16:00 2 1 182 233
04:15 0 1 20 20 16:15 3 2 161 196
04:30 0 0 32 23 16:30 1 1 168 196
04:45 0 0 0 2 55 123 21 73 198 16:45 1 7 1 5 185 696 209 834 1542
05:00 0 0 42 28 17:00 2 1 149 210
05:15 0 1 50 38 17:15 4 1 145 208
05:30 1 2 77 40 17:30 3 1 161 180
05:45 1 2 2 5 133 302 48 154 463 17:45 0 9 1 4 153 608 166 764 1385
06:00 3 4 82 58 18:00 1 5 123 137
06:15 0 5 103 52 18:15 1 2 113 129
06:30 2 2 151 66 18:30 3 3 115 142
06:45 2 7 3 14 194 530 77 253 804 18:45 1 6 3 13 89 440 113 521 980
07:00 2 4 161 95 19:00 1 2 90 120
07:15 1 2 178 77 19:15 11 14 87 120
07:30 6 1 188 117 19:30 6 7 89 112
07:45 2 11 7 14 235 762 111 400 1187 19:45 2 20 1 24 72 338 94 446 828
08:00 5 7 178 127 20:00 3 4 61 95
08:15 1 2 212 96 20:15 1 0 73 91
08:30 6 4 209 136 20:30 2 4 45 76
08:45 5 17 5 18 226 825 145 504 1364 20:45 1 7 3 11 61 240 68 330 588
09:00 6 1 174 169 21:00 4 3 41 75
09:15 7 5 183 177 21:15 1 0 64 65
09:30 2 6 196 178 21:30 0 1 55 50
09:45 2 17 2 14 202 755 152 676 1462 21:45 1 6 2 6 54 214 53 243 469
10:00 2 1 179 170 22:00 0 0 30 56
10:15 8 6 183 172 22:15 0 0 33 50
10:30 2 5 165 195 22:30 3 0 32 59
10:45 2 14 4 16 166 693 196 733 1456 22:45 0 3 1 1 37 132 49 214 350
11:00 3 3 187 179 23:00 2 0 34 48
11:15 3 3 170 138 23:15 2 1 25 48
11:30 6 6 171 170 23:30 1 0 29 45
11:45 3 15 6 18 175 703 150 637 1373 23:45 0 5 0 1 21 109 46 187 302
Total Vol.87 102 4776 3507 8472 103 92 5669 6538 12402
GPS Coordinates:
NL NR EB WB Combined
190 194 10445 10045 20874
Split %1.0%1.2%56.4% 41.4%40.6%0.8%0.7%45.7%52.7%59.4%
Peak Hour 08:30 07:45 07:45 10:15 08:45 19:15 18:45 12:00 15:30 16:00
Volume 24 20 834 742 1485 22 26 755 836 1542
P.H.F.0.86 0.71 0.89 0.95 0.97 0.50 0.46 0.93 0.90 0.92
Prepared by: Field Data Services of Arizona/Veracity Traffic Group (520) 316-6745
Daily Totals
AM PM
DAY 7
32.423871, -110.982127
Monday, June 30, 2025 Project#25-1347-001
Musette Dr & Tangerine Rd (Approaches)
Intersection Turning Movement
Prepared by:
N-S STREET:Rancho Vistoso Blvd DATE:03/29/25 LOCATION: Oro Valley
E-W STREET:Vistoso Village Dr DAY:SATURDAY PROJECT#
NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL
LANES:1 2 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
12:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
12:15 AM 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4
12:30 AM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
12:45 AM 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 5
1:00 AM 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
1:15 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
1:30 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
1:45 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
2:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2:15 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
2:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2:45 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
3:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3:15 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
3:30 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
3:45 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
4:00 AM 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
4:15 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
4:30 AM 0 2 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
4:45 AM 0 3 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7
5:00 AM 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
5:15 AM 0 1 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
5:30 AM 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 5
5:45 AM 0 6 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 14
6:00 AM 0 7 1 1 8 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 20
6:15 AM 0 4 2 0 12 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 21
6:30 AM 0 7 2 0 16 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 31
6:45 AM 0 13 3 1 26 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 49
7:00 AM 0 15 1 1 16 0 0 0 0 7 0 1 41
7:15 AM 0 30 2 1 28 0 0 0 0 9 0 2 72
7:30 AM 0 24 9 1 32 0 0 0 0 4 0 7 77
7:45 AM 1 30 6 2 51 0 1 0 0 2 1 5 99
8:00 AM 0 28 14 3 50 0 0 0 0 15 0 6 116
8:15 AM 0 36 6 4 57 0 0 0 0 7 0 2 112
8:30 AM 0 41 4 1 60 0 0 0 0 7 0 6 119
8:45 AM 0 55 4 2 85 0 0 0 0 8 0 3 157
9:00 AM 0 48 6 7 62 0 0 0 0 11 0 5 139
9:15 AM 0 41 8 1 56 0 0 0 0 8 0 4 118
9:30 AM 0 40 6 7 94 0 0 0 0 9 0 4 160
9:45 AM 0 55 5 2 87 0 0 0 0 9 0 6 164
10:00 AM 0 50 12 5 80 0 0 0 0 10 0 4 161
10:15 AM 0 52 11 4 88 0 0 0 0 10 0 2 167
10:30 AM 0 58 7 2 93 0 0 0 1 7 0 4 172
10:45 AM 0 59 5 3 102 0 0 0 0 15 0 5 189
11:00 AM 0 62 12 0 63 0 0 0 0 12 0 2 151
11:15 AM 0 58 10 2 86 0 0 0 0 13 0 2 171
11:30 AM 0 54 10 2 77 0 0 0 0 11 0 4 158
11:45 AM 0 76 9 3 82 0 0 0 0 7 0 7 184
12:00 PM 0 68 7 4 79 0 0 0 0 5 0 2 165
12:15 PM 0 66 7 2 79 0 0 0 0 8 0 2 164
12:30 PM 0 59 3 3 53 0 0 0 0 8 0 4 130
12:45 PM 0 63 6 3 73 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 148
1:00 PM 0 72 11 1 74 0 0 0 0 6 0 2 166
1:15 PM 0 64 8 0 69 0 0 0 0 5 0 2 148
1:30 PM 1 64 1 1 57 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 135
1:45 PM 0 68 8 1 64 1 1 0 0 11 0 1 155
2:00 PM 0 69 3 2 50 0 0 0 0 7 0 1 132
2:15 PM 0 77 8 2 64 0 0 0 1 6 0 0 158
2:30 PM 0 61 6 1 58 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 134
2:45 PM 0 68 10 0 64 0 0 0 0 13 0 2 157
3:00 PM 0 47 7 3 48 0 0 0 0 2 0 5 112
3:15 PM 0 75 6 0 70 0 0 0 0 6 0 1 158
3:30 PM 0 51 9 4 74 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 148
3:45 PM 0 57 8 2 82 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 154
4:00 PM 0 45 9 2 47 0 0 0 0 8 0 2 113
4:15 PM 0 51 3 1 44 0 0 0 0 9 0 1 109
4:30 PM 0 65 1 0 48 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 119
4:45 PM 0 45 5 2 37 0 0 0 0 7 0 1 97
5:00 PM 0 68 10 2 40 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 124
5:15 PM 0 53 7 4 37 0 0 0 0 6 0 2 109
5:30 PM 0 25 5 0 43 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 75
5:45 PM 0 35 5 1 46 0 0 0 0 6 0 1 94
6:00 PM 0 37 10 2 36 0 0 0 0 9 0 1 95
6:15 PM 0 38 8 2 18 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 70
6:30 PM 1 25 5 1 28 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 65
6:45 PM 0 36 4 1 32 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 76
7:00 PM 0 28 9 0 21 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 63
7:15 PM 0 30 0 2 17 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 53
7:30 PM 0 24 4 5 9 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 48
7:45 PM 0 24 3 1 16 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 47
8:00 PM 0 23 8 2 10 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 45
8:15 PM 0 15 3 0 19 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 39
8:30 PM 0 28 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 40
8:45 PM 0 20 2 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 29
9:00 PM 0 19 4 0 9 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 35
9:15 PM 0 12 2 0 9 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 25
9:30 PM 0 14 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23
9:45 PM 0 8 2 1 7 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 20
10:00 PM 0 10 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 17
10:15 PM 0 6 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 13
10:30 PM 0 5 2 0 7 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 16
10:45 PM 0 7 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9
11:00 PM 0 4 1 2 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 12
11:15 PM 0 5 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 10
11:30 PM 0 2 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8
11:45 PM 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL
Volumes 3 2805 396 118 3115 2 3 1 4 404 3 128 6982
Approach %0.09 87.55 12.36 3.65 96.29 0.06 37.50 12.50 50.00 75.51 0.56 23.93
App/Depart 3204 /2936 3235 /3523 8 /515 535 /8
1000 AM
PEAK
Volumes 0 219 35 14 363 0 0 0 1 42 0 15 689
Approach %0.00 86.22 13.78 3.71 96.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 73.68 0.00 26.32
PEAK HR.
FACTOR:0.911
32.444789, -110.941025
2-Way Stop (EB & WB)
COMMENT 1:
GPS:
CONTROL:
25-1144-005
West leg is a small parking lot to the bike trail
Peak Hr Begins at:
0.713
WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
0.898 0.2500.977
veracity grouptraffic
August 2025 Signal and HAWK Warrant Evaluations
Appendix B – ADOT Pedestrian Signal Warrant Evaluation Sheet
ADOT Traffic Engineering Guidelines and Processes
June 2015
Section 600 – Traffic Signals
640-1
640 PEDESTRIAN HYBRID BEACON
A pedestrian hybrid beacon (PHB) is a special type of hybrid beacon used to warn
and control traffic at an unsignalized location to assist pedestrians in crossing a
street or highway at a marked crosswalk.
If used, PHBs shall be used in conjunction with signs and pavement
markings to warn and control traffic at locations where pedestrians enter
or cross a street or highway. A PHB shall only be installed at a marked
crosswalk.
The design and operation of pedestrian hybrid beacons should follow the guidelines
set forth in the MUTCD.
PHB Evaluation Guidelines
To improve pedestrian crossings there are many possible treatments. These
treatments include, but are not limited to, marked crosswalks, high visibility
crosswalks, two-stage crosswalks, median refuges, street lighting, in-pavement
lights, rectangular rapid flash beacons, PHBs, and pedestrian signals. A
comprehensive evaluation of pedestrian crossing safety should be conducted in order
to identify the most effective treatment.
PHBs should not be installed on roadways with speed limits greater than 45 mph.
The evaluation form shown in Exhibit 640-A should be used in determining whether
or not a Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon should be utilized. A minimum score of 35 points
merits Pedestrian Hybrid beacon consideration.
Additional factors that should be considered when a crossing merits PHB
consideration:
Is the location within a coordinated signal network?
Does the roadway environment support the installation of the PHB? Does the
street have adjoining sidewalks and/or pathways that will result in a logical
utilization of the PHB?
Is right-of-way needed?
Are there utility conflicts?
Is there significant potential for environmental or cultural issues?
Is funding of the PHB available?
Is 120/240 single phase power available at a reasonable cost?
Does the local jurisdiction support the installation of a PHB? Is the local
jurisdiction willing to pay for the power for the PHB? Is the local jurisdiction
willing and capable of accepting the maintenance and operation of the PHB?
Will the local jurisdiction pay for the power in order to light the crosswalk?
ADOT Traffic Engineering Guidelines and Processes
June 2015
Section 600 – Traffic Signals
640-2
Exhibit 640-A. PEDESTRIAN HYBRID BEACON (PHB) EVALUATION
Figure 640-A
PEDESTRIAN HYBRID BEACON (PHB) EVALUATION
PEDESTRIAN HYBRID BEACON (PHB) EVALUATION
Location: __________________________________________ Date: ________________________
1. Motor vehicle crashes correctable by installation of PHB – Award 5 points for each crash
(for the most recent 5 years of data) involving pedestrians, bicyclists, wheel chairs,
skateboards, motorized scooters, or golf carts crossing within 500 feet on either side
of the proposed PHB locations, or half the distance to the nearest signal (whichever is less): ________
2. Peak hour pedestrian crossing volume – Award points if the average peak hour pedestrian
crossing volume within 500 feet on either side of the proposed PHB location, or half the
distance to the nearest traffic signal (whichever is less): ________
0 points 0 – 10 pedestrians per peak hour (average)
2 points 11 – 20 pedestrians per peak hour (average)
4 points 21 – 39 pedestrians per peak hour (average)
6 points 40+ pedestrians per peak hour (average)
3. Location of nearest existing traffic signal or existing PHB – Award points: ________
- 5 points Less than 500 feet
0 points 500 – 1,000 feet
5 points Over 1,000 feet
4. Posted speed limit – Award points: ________
0 points Under 30 mph
2 points 30 – 35 mph
4 points 40 – 45 mph
5. Roadway traffic volume (AADT) – Award points: ________
0 points Less than 5,000
2 points 5,000 – 9,999
4 points 10,000 – 14,999
6 points 15,000+
6. Raised median – Award 5 points if the roadway does not have a raised median with a minimum
width of 6 feet. ________
7. Shared-use path or walkway – Award 5 points if a designated, maintained, and permitted
shared-use path or walkway crosses the road at the proposed PHB location. ________
8. Pedestrian activity generator – Award 5 points if the proposed PHB location is within 500 feet of
a senior center, medical facility, community center, school, or other pedestrian activity generator. ________
9. Roadway illumination – Award 5 points if the proposed PHB location does not have roadway
illumination. ________
10. Crossing distance – Award 5 points if the crossing distance is greater than 36 feet. (If a raised
median with a minimum width of 6 feet is present, the crossing distance is measured to the median). ________
GRAND TOTAL ________
Musette Dr. & Tangerine Rd.
Intersection
Installation of a Traffic Signal
March 4, 2026
MUTCD Warrant Close, but not met
Promised Council would return to discuss
if warrants not met
Close to meeting Warrant #3:
Figure 6 shows the plotted point for the lone hour
during which the minor street meets the minimum
volume threshold for satisfying the warrant.
A second plotted point, where the minor street
volume falls just below the threshold, is also shown.
Although the second plotted point is just seven
vehicles short of the thresholds, neither point
exceeds the applicable line on the figure, so
Condition B is not currently met.
Poor Sight Distance
Vertical street curvature
occludes clearly seeing
oncoming WB traffic
Recommendations
Best practices are to adhere to MUTCD Warrants unless there are extenuating
circumstances present.
For instance – the signal at the CRC was installed because of complete NB sight distance occlusion.
Of the nine MUTCD Warrants, the first 3 are based on vehicular volume:
Warrant #3 is very close to being met
Tangerine Rd. will continue to increase in traffic volume due to improvements to the west at I-10, which is currently
under construction
The other 6 warrants are not applicable in this situation
The extenuating circumstance for the Tangerine/Musette intersection is poor sight
distance of WB traffic
Town Council Regular Session 4.
Meeting Date:03/04/2026
Requested by: Vice Mayor Barrett and Councilmember Murphy
Submitted By:Mike Standish, Town Clerk's Office
Department:Town Clerk's Office
SUBJECT:
DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING CELL PHONE RECEPTION NORTH OF TANGERINE
ROAD, THE TOWN’S ROLE IN THIS MATTER AND WHAT THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY CAN DO TO
ENCOURAGE GREATER COVERAGE AND ACCESS
RECOMMENDATION:
N/A
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
This item was requested by Vice Mayor Barrett and Councilmember Murphy.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
Beginning in September 2025, the Town initiated a review of complaints related to cellular tower
placement and service coverage. Staff responded to resident's inquiry regarding a perception that the
Town had denied additional cell tower permits for Verizon and T-Mobile, confirming that no permits had
been denied by the Town. In fact, since 2007, the Town has approved seven (7) major
communications facilities, and since 2016, 32 minor communications facilities have been approved.
The Town has not denied any permits related to communications facilities.
It is important to note that issues related to cellular service quality are matters between individual
customers and their service providers. The Town does not regulate or control the operational business
practices of private telecommunications companies.
Town staff also contacted Verizon to address reports of spotty coverage within Town areas. Verizon
initially responded that coverage levels were acceptable and advised that individual customers should
contact Verizon directly regarding service concerns. Subsequently, the Oro Valley Police Department
reported cellular coverage issues in the Moore Road area. Town staff again engaged Verizon to
discuss these concerns. Verizon initiated a review of antenna configurations and identified issues with
one of its towers. The company indicated it had begun remediation efforts; however, Verizon would not
provide details regarding future infrastructure plans.
Town staff also requested a meeting with Verizon to discuss potential tower placement and coverage
improvements. Verizon responded that participation would require the Town to sign a Non-Disclosure
Agreement (NDA). After legal review, staff were advised that the proposed NDA conflicted with Arizona
Public Records Law. As a result, the Town was unable to agree to the NDA, and no further meeting has
occurred regarding tower placement or coverage expansion.
Additionally, in October 2025, Town staff reached out to AT&T to explore coverage concerns. Following
several discussions, staff met with FirstNet representatives, but the discussion primarily focused on
sales and service offerings rather than infrastructure placement or specific cellular reception
sales and service offerings rather than infrastructure placement or specific cellular reception
improvements. The discussion or product would not be beneficial to the public at-large.
Remedies to Consider by the Town
Although the Town does not regulate carrier operations, Council could consider some of the following
actions:
Pass a resolution in support of additional infrastructure installations (cell towers, etc.) of
telecommunications vendors
Continue encouraging carriers to conduct updated radio frequency propagation studies to
validate coverage gaps
Identify potential Town-owned properties that may be suitable for small-cell or macro tower
placement
Potential Benefits to Constituents
If infrastructure improvements are implemented, residents and businesses could see:
Improved call reliability and reduced dropped calls
Enhanced data speeds and overall mobile service performance
Greater public safety resilience through improved first responder connectivity
FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to...
Attachments
No file(s) attached.
Town Council Regular Session 15. 1.
Meeting Date:03/04/2026
Submitted By:Mike Standish, Town Clerk's Office
Department:Town Clerk's Office
SUBJECT:
*Pursuant to A.R.S. 38-431.03 (A)(3) and(A)(4) to discuss or consult with the attorneys for the public body
regarding a 60 day notice received from Archaeology Southwest regarding the Conservation Easement
RECOMMENDATION:
N/A
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
N/A
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to go into Executive Session.
Attachments
No file(s) attached.
Town Council Regular Session 18. 5.
Meeting Date:03/04/2026
Submitted By:Mike Standish, Town Clerk's Office
Department:Town Clerk's Office
SUBJECT:
*APPROVAL OF ANY DIRECTION TO THE TOWN ATTORNEY AND/OR NECESSARY STAFF AS DISCUSSED
IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING THE 60 DAY NOTICE RECEIVED FROM ARCHAEOLOGY
SOUTHWEST REGARDING THE CONSERVATION EASEMENT
RECOMMENDATION:
N/A
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
N/A
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to...
Attachments
No file(s) attached.