The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPackets - Council Packets (2025) *AMENDED (4/7/26, 4:15 PM) AGENDA ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION APRIL 8, 2026 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11000 N. LA CAÑADA DRIVE For information on public comment procedures, please see the instructions for in person and/or virtual speakers at the end of the agenda. To watch and/or listen to the public meeting online, please visit https://www.orovalleyaz.gov/town/departments/town-clerk/meetings-and-agendas Executive Sessions – Upon a vote of the majority of the Town Council, the Council may enter into Executive Sessions pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes §38-431.03 (A)(3) to obtain legal advice on matters listed on the Agenda. REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 5:00 PM CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL EXECUTIVE SESSION 1. *Pursuant to A.R.S. 38-431.03 (A)(3) and(A)(4) to discuss or consult with the attorneys for the public body regarding a request from Archaeology Southwest to mediate regarding a dispute as it relates to the conservation easement 1. *Pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.03(A)(1) and (A)(3) Personnel matter - Town Magistrate annual performance review RESUME REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL REGULAR AGENDA 1. *APPROVAL OF ANY DIRECTION TO THE TOWN ATTORNEY AND/OR NECESSARY STAFF AS 1. *APPROVAL OF ANY DIRECTION TO THE TOWN ATTORNEY AND/OR NECESSARY STAFF AS DISCUSSED IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING A REQUEST FROM ARCHAEOLOGY SOUTHWEST TO MEDIATE REGARDING A DISPUTE AS IT RELATES TO THE CONSERVATION EASEMENT 1. *APPROVAL OF ANY DIRECTION TO THE TOWN ATTORNEY AND/OR NECESSARY STAFF AS DISCUSSED IN EXECUTIVE SESSION PERTAINING TO THE ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW OF THE TOWN MAGISTRATE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS ON CURRENT EVENTS TOWN MANAGER'S REPORT ON CURRENT EVENTS ORDER OF BUSINESS: MAYOR WILL REVIEW THE ORDER OF THE MEETING INFORMATIONAL ITEMS CALL TO AUDIENCE – At this time, any member of the public is allowed to address the Mayor and Town Council on any issue not listed on today’s agenda. Pursuant to the Arizona Open Meeting Law, individual Council Members may ask Town Staff to review the matter, ask that the matter be placed on a future agenda, or respond to criticism made by speakers. However, the Mayor and Council may not discuss or take legal action on matters raised during “Call to Audience.” In order to speak during “Call to Audience” please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. PRESENTATIONS 1.Proclamation - Week of the Young Child 2.Presentation regarding the Transportation Art by Youth (TABY) program desert wildlife sculptures 3.Presentation from the Pima Association of Governments (PAG) regarding their Transportation Safety Planning Data 4.Presentation of Recreational Amenities Financial Analysis CONSENT AGENDA (Consideration and/or possible action) A.Minutes - March 18, 2026 B.Resolution No. (R)26-12, designating David Gephart as Chief Fiscal Officer, authorized to submit the Town's Annual Expenditure Limitation Report (AELR) to the State Auditor General for FY 26-27 C.Resolution No. (R)26-13, authorizing and approving an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) between the Town of Oro Valley and the Pima County Recorder's Office to provide election services through December 31, 2026 REGULAR AGENDA 2.DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION TO INCREASE FUNDING AUTHORIZATION FOR THE VISTOSO TRAILS NATURE PRESERVE POND PROJECT AS IT RELATES TO SCOPE OF WORK FOR THE BID THAT WAS RECEIVED ON MARCH 20, 2026 3.PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE NO. (O)26-06, DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION TO ALLOW THE TOWN ENGINEER AND CHIEF OF POLICE THE AUTHORITY TO TEMPORARILY SUSPEND NO PARKING SIGN RESTRICTIONS ON PUBLIC STREETS FOR SPECIAL EVENTS 4.DIRECTION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE'S FAILURE TO TIMELY AMEND THE ORO VALLEY MODEL TAX CODE THEREBY VOIDING THE ACTION OF COUNCIL ON JANUARY 14, 2026 AS IT RELATES TO THE USE TAX *EXECUTIVE SESSION 2.*Pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.03(A)(1) and (A)(3) Personnel matter - Town Magistrate annual performance review *RESUME REGULAR SESSION *CALL TO ORDER *REGULAR AGENDA 5.*APPROVAL OF ANY DIRECTION TO THE TOWN ATTORNEY AND/OR NECESSARY STAFF AS DISCUSSED IN EXECUTIVE SESSION PERTAINING TO THE ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW OF THE TOWN MAGISTRATE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS (The Council may bring forth general topics for future meeting agendas. Council may not discuss, deliberate or take any action on the topics presented pursuant to ARS 38-431.02H) ADJOURNMENT POSTED: 4/2/26 at 5:00 p.m. by ck POSTED: 4/2/26 at 5:00 p.m. by ck AMENDED AGENDA POSTED: 4/7/26 at 4:45 p.m. by ck The Mayor and Council may, at the discretion of the meeting chairperson, discuss any Agenda item. When possible, a packet of agenda materials as listed above is available for public inspection at least 24 hours prior to the Council meeting in the office of the Town Clerk between the hours of 8:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. The Town of Oro Valley complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If any person with a disability needs any type of accommodation, please notify the Town Clerk’s Office at least five days prior to the Council meeting at 229-4700. PUBLIC COMMENT ON AGENDA ITEMS The Town has modified its public comment procedures for its public bodies to allow for limited remote/virtual comment via Zoom. The public may provide comments remotely only on items posted as required Public Hearings, provided the speaker registers 24 hours prior to the meeting. For all other items, the public may complete a blue speaker card to be recognized in person by the Mayor, according to all other rules and procedures. Written comments can also be emailed to Town Clerk Michael Standish at mstandish@orovalleyaz.gov for distribution to the Town Council prior to the meeting. Further instructions to speakers are noted below. INSTRUCTIONS TO IN-PERSON SPEAKERS Members of the public shall be allowed to speak on posted public hearings and during Call to Audience when attending the meeting in person. The public may be allowed to speak on other posted items on the agenda at the discretion of the Mayor. If you wish to address the Town Council on any item(s) on this agenda, please complete a blue speaker card located on the Agenda table at the back of the room and give it to the Town Clerk. Please indicate on the blue speaker card which item number and topic you wish to speak on, or, if you wish to speak during Call to Audience, please specify what you wish to discuss. Please step forward to the podium when the Mayor calls on you to address the Council. 1. For the record, please state your name and whether or not you are a Town resident. 2. Speak only on the issue currently being discussed by Council. You will only be allowed to address the Council one time regarding the topic being discussed. 3. Please limit your comments to 3 minutes. 4. During Call to Audience, you may address the Council on any matter that is not on the agenda. 5. Any member of the public speaking must speak in a courteous and respectful manner to those present. INSTRUCTIONS TO VIRTUAL SPEAKERS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS Members of the public may attend the meeting virtually and request to speak virtually on any agenda item that is listed as a Public Hearing. If you wish to address the Town Council virtually during any listed Public Hearing, please complete the online speaker form by clicking here https://forms.orovalleyaz.gov/forms/bluecard at least 24 hours prior to the start of the meeting. You must provide a valid email address in order to register. Town Staff will email you a link to the Zoom meeting the day of the meeting. After being recognized by the Mayor, staff will unmute your microphone access and you will have 3 minutes to address the Council. Further instructions regarding remote participation will be included in the email. Thank you for your cooperation. Town Council Regular Session Meeting Date:04/08/2026 Submitted By:Mike Standish, Town Clerk's Office Department:Town Clerk's Office SUBJECT: 1. *Pursuant to A.R.S. 38-431.03 (A)(3) and(A)(4) to discuss or consult with the attorneys for the public body regarding a request from Archaeology Southwest to mediate regarding a dispute as it relates to the conservation easement RECOMMENDATION: N/A EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: N/A BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: N/A SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to go into Executive Session. Attachments No file(s) attached. Town Council Regular Session Meeting Date:04/08/2026 Submitted By:Mike Standish, Town Clerk's Office Department:Town Clerk's Office SUBJECT: 1. *APPROVAL OF ANY DIRECTION TO THE TOWN ATTORNEY AND/OR NECESSARY STAFF AS DISCUSSED IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING A REQUEST FROM ARCHAEOLOGY SOUTHWEST TO MEDIATE REGARDING A DISPUTE AS IT RELATES TO THE CONSERVATION EASEMENT RECOMMENDATION: N/A EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: N/A BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: N/A SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to... Attachments No file(s) attached. Town Council Regular Session 1. Meeting Date:04/08/2026 Proclamation - Week of the Young Child Subject Proclamation - Week of the Young Child Summary Attachments Proclamation Town Council Regular Session 2. Meeting Date:04/08/2026 TABY Project Ribbon Cutting Presentation Subject Presentation regarding the Transportation Art by Youth (TABY) program desert wildlife sculptures Summary Attachments No file(s) attached. Town Council Regular Session 3. Meeting Date:04/08/2026 PAG Transportation Safety Planning Data Presentation Subject Presentation from the Pima Association of Governments (PAG) regarding their Transportation Safety Planning Data Summary Attachments No file(s) attached. Town Council Regular Session 4. Meeting Date:04/08/2026 Presentation of Recreational Amenities Financial Analysis Subject Presentation of Recreational Amenities Financial Analysis Summary This item presents results from the Strategic Plan project "Recreational Amenities Financial Analysis". Attachments Town Council Report - Recreational Amenities Financial Analysis Staff Presentation 1 Town Manager’s Office TOWN COUNCIL REPORT DATE: April 8, 2026 TO: Mayor and Councilmembers FROM: Jeff Wilkins, Town Manager Dave Gephart, Chief Financial Officer Roz Epting, Parks and Recreation Director Wendy Gomez, Deputy Finance Director Matt Jankowski, Deputy Finance Director Chris Hutchison, Senior Budget Analyst SUBJECT: Recreational Amenities Financial Analysis EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Per the Town’s FY2026 - FY2027 Strategic Plan, this report is intended to provide a comprehensive financial analysis of the Town’s recreational amenities, including the Aquatic Center, Community and Recreation Center and individual parks. Revenue and expenditure data included in this report are for FY (Fiscal Year) 24/25. SCOPE OF AMENITIES INCLUDED IN THIS REPORT  Oro Valley Aquatic Center (OVAC)  Oro Valley Community and Recreation Center (CRC)  Golf  Steam Pump Ranch  Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve (VTNP)  James D. Kriegh (JDK) Park  Naranja Park  Riverfront Park SUMMARY OF ALL AMENITIES – FY 24/25 Amenity Total Expenditures Total Revenue Net Operating Cost Capital OVAC $1,631,707 $515,843 $1,115,864 - CRC 2,323,949 1,580,194 743,755 160,265 Golf 5,687,025 6,418,398 (731,373) 2,022,862 Steam Pump Ranch 675,323 115,519 559,803 378,216 VTNP 185,059 22,499 162,560 328,454 JDK Park 604,592 86,867 517,725 - Naranja Park 673,717 170,952 502,765 - Riverfront Park 426,905 82,976 343,929 - TOTAL $12,208,277 $8,993,248 $3,215,028 $2,889,797 * Golf net operating cost shown in parentheses indicates revenues exceeded expenditures by $731,373. Capital expenditures are reported separately and are not included in net operating cost figures. 2 DISCUSSION The mission of the Oro Valley Parks and Recreation Department is to inspire connection through recreation - connecting people to people, people to community, and people to nature. The purpose of the Parks and Recreation Department is to enhance the quality of life for all Oro Valley residents by providing exceptional parks, trails, recreation programs, facilities and events. This financial analysis is not intended to rank amenities or services against one another. In general, amenities that serve broad community need, such as parks and publicly accessible facilities, are expected to have higher Town support levels than those with a more individual or discretionary benefit. For example, passive parks and nature preserves can be expected to have minimal cost recovery. An aquatic center would be expected to cover more of its costs due to entrance fees and memberships, offset with necessary staffing requirements and pool operating costs. Recreation centers with membership dues would typically have a higher cost recovery. Venue spaces will vary. Golf, with membership dues and usage fees would generally be expected to break even. Additional factors including accessibility, community demand, and strategic priorities are relevant to any evaluation of an amenities’ value and are not captured in financial data alone. Data for this report was drawn from CivicRec, the Town’s recreational software, and Munis, the Town’s financial software. Where precise figures were unavailable, Parks and Recreation and Finance Department staff applied professional judgement to allocate personnel time, materials and other costs as applicable. Slight timing differences can be expected between CivicRec data and Munis data. Please note that neither the Town’s budget, nor its financial reporting delineates budget or expenditure amounts by individual park or amenity. The Parks Maintenance Division, for example, encompasses costs for all Town parks; therefore, professional estimates and assumptions for cost allocation were employed where necessary, based on park acreage, field acreage, square footage or other measures as appropriate. Operating expenditures included in this report are limited to those within the Parks and Recreation Department budget. Costs incurred by the Police Department or Economic Development, for example, that might be related to special events and other Parks and Recreation activities are excluded. The Town’s smaller and undeveloped passive trail parks, such as Honeybee Canyon and Panorama Trails, are also excluded from this report, as these amenities have minimal costs and do not generate any revenue. This report focuses on current costs; long-term expenses such as asset depreciation are not factored into this report. Capital costs are noted separate from calculated net operating costs. The following pages include additional detail on the individual net operating cost calculations. Please see Appendix A for detailed cost recovery calculations for Parks and Recreation camps, programs and classes. 3 AQUATIC CENTER The Oro Valley Aquatic Center (OVAC) is a competition-level facility and includes a water slide, a splash pad and other family-friendly amenities. Personnel costs include all facility staff as well as allocated oversight costs for the department director and deputy director. Full-time personnel costs were $442,443, while the remaining $600,118 was for part- time staff. The Aquatic Center had no capital outlay expenditures for FY 24/25. FY 24/25 Expenditures Actual Personnel 1,042,561$ Operations & Maintenance 589,146 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,631,707$ FY 24/25 Revenue Actual Amphi School District facility usage 30,292$ Contracted Programs 37,024 Swim Team 138,782 Special Events 1,264 OVAC Daily Dropins 94,084 OVAC Outside Competitions 851 Swim Meets 53,208 Aquatic Center Rental Income 12,138 OVAC Memberships/Passes 142,846 OVAC In-House Programs 5,355 TOTAL REVENUE 515,843$ FY 24/25 NET OPERATING COST 1,115,864$ 4 COMMUNITY AND RECREATION CENTER The Oro Valley Community and Recreation Center (CRC) features fitness classes, cardio and strength equipment, racquetball, pickleball, tennis and swimming. The facility also hosts various camps and Town events throughout the year. The CRC charges for memberships and daily drop-ins. In October 2025, Town Council approved the first fee increase in more than ten years. Personnel costs include all facility and maintenance staff, as well as allocated oversight costs for the department director, deputy director and administrative staff. Operating costs include all Town facility and maintenance costs, including aquatics, fitness and tennis, as well as allocated utility costs based on building square footage. Full-time personnel costs were $452,085, while the remaining $850,643 was for part- time staff. CRC FY 24/25 Capital $ 160,265 FY 24/25 Expenditures Actual Personnel 1,302,728$ Operations & Maintenance 1,021,221 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,323,949$ FY 24/25 Revenue Actual Concession Sales 137$ Daily Drop-In 71,709 Member Dues 996,505 In House Recreation Programs 301,520 Contracted Recreation Programs 117,258 Facility Rental Income 93,065 TOTAL REVENUE 1,580,194$ FY 24/25 NET OPERATING COST 743,755$ 5 GOLF The Town’s three golf courses, totaling 45 holes of golf, as well as the Overlook restaurant are contract-operated by Troon. Troon operates the courses and restaurant with a commercial business perspective and has latitude to revise fees when needed. Revenues and all operating costs are per Troon’s audited financial statements and also include any golf expenditures that were paid by the Town, such as operating capital, lease payments and associated debt service, but do not include any allocated staff time for Town personnel. Golf FY 24/25 Total Capital $ 2,022,862 (Elevator and entryway $1.2 million of this amount) FY 24/25 Expenditures Actual Personnel 2,389,117$ Operations & Maintenance 3,297,908 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 5,687,025$ FY 24/25 Revenue Actual Membership Fees 1,729,349$ Green Fees 2,521,557 Sales - Tournament 371,848 Sales - Member Rounds 5,201 Golf Lessons 22,343 Range, Rental & Other Golf Related 149,443 Cart Fees 382,352 Merchandise Sales 333,599 Food and Beverage 900,243 Other Revenue 2,463 TOTAL REVENUE 6,418,398$ FY 24/25 NET OPERATING COST (731,373)$ 6 STEAM PUMP RANCH Steam Pump Ranch is a sixteen-acre historic property hosting various venues, camps and events throughout the year. Personnel costs include facility, maintenance and allocated supervisory staff as well as allocated oversight costs for the department director and deputy director. Operating costs include facility and grounds maintenance, camps, events, utilities and supplies. Maintenance, supply and material costs are allocated by acreage where appropriate. Full-time personnel costs were $420,561, while the remaining $142,594 was for part- time staff. Steam Pump Ranch FY 24/25 Total Capital $ 378,216 FY 24/25 Expenditures Actual Personnel 563,245$ Operations & Maintenance 112,077 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 675,323$ FY 24/25 Revenue Actual SPR In-House Rec Programs 77,637$ SPR Ramada Rentals 90 SPR Special Events 625 SPR Contracted Programs 17,372 SPR Rentals 19,795 TOTAL REVENUE 115,519$ FY 24/25 NET OPERATING COST 559,803$ 7 VISTOSO TRAILS NATURE PRESERVE (VTNP) Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve is a 202-acre passive park, formerly a golf course, with 6.2 miles of multi-use paths winding through the property, providing visitors with views of the Catalina and Tortolita mountains, examples of varied desert vegetation, and the opportunity to view an abundance of wildlife. Desert ecosystem and pond restoration are currently underway at the preserve. Personnel costs include maintenance and allocated supervisory staff as well as allocated oversight costs for the department director, deputy director and administrative staff. Full-time personnel costs were $105,691, while the remaining $2,587 was for part-time staff. VTNP FY 24/25 Total Capital $ 328,454 FY 24/25 Expenditures Actual Personnel 108,277$ Operations & Maintenance 76,782 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 185,059$ FY 24/25 Revenue Actual State Grants 22,499$ TOTAL REVENUE 22,499$ FY 24/25 NET OPERATING COST 162,560$ 8 JAMES D. KRIEGH (JDK) PARK JDK park features ballfields, mature trees, a playground, racquetball courts and a dog park. JDK Park is home to the Oro Valley Aquatic Center and hosts a number of Town events throughout the year, including 4th of July, HallOVeen Spooktacular and Easter Eggstravaganza. Personnel costs include maintenance and allocated supervisory staff as well as allocated oversight costs for the department director, deputy director and administrative staff. Operating costs include all grounds maintenance, events, utilities and supplies. Maintenance, supply and material costs are allocated by acreage where appropriate. Full-time personnel costs were $194,817, while the remaining $2,932 was for part-time staff. JDK Park had no capital outlay expenditures for FY 24/25. FY 24/25 Expenditures Actual Personnel 197,748$ Operations & Maintenance 406,844 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 604,592$ FY 24/25 Revenue Actual Field Rentals 80,922$ Ramada Rentals 4,960 Contracted Programs 985 TOTAL REVENUE 86,867$ FY 24/25 NET OPERATING COST 517,725$ 9 NARANJA PARK Naranja Park is home to the Oro Valley Archery Range and trails, dog parks, a playground, splash pad, skate park/pump track, ramadas with picnic tables and competition-ready multi-use fields. Personnel costs include maintenance and allocated supervisory staff as well as allocated oversight costs for the department director, deputy director and administrative staff. Operating costs include all grounds maintenance, events, utilities and supplies. Maintenance, supply and material costs are allocated by acreage where appropriate. Full-time personnel costs were $244,953, while the remaining $2,932 was for part-time staff. Naranja Park had no capital outlay expenditures for FY 24/25. FY 24/25 Expenditures Actual Personnel 247,885$ Operations & Maintenance 425,833 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 673,717$ FY 24/25 Revenue Actual Contracted Programs 5,210$ Ramada Rentals 13,350 Field Rentals 132,495 Archery Memberships 19,897 TOTAL REVENUE 170,952$ FY 24/25 NET OPERATING COST 502,765$ 10 RIVERFRONT PARK Cañada del Oro Riverfront Park features walking trails, tennis and basketball courts, soccer and softball fields, shaded playground equipment and ramadas. Personnel costs include maintenance and allocated supervisory staff as well as allocated oversight costs for the department director, deputy director and administrative staff. Operating costs include all grounds maintenance, events, utilities and supplies. Maintenance, supply and material costs are allocated by acreage where appropriate. Full-time personnel costs were $160,017, while the remaining $2,932 was for part-time staff. Riverfront Park had no capital outlay expenditures for FY 24/25. RECOMMENDATION: This report is for information only. Staff time spent preparing report: 146 hours FY 24/25 Expenditures Actual Personnel 162,949$ Operations & Maintenance 263,957 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 426,905$ FY 24/25 Revenue Actual Ramada Rentals 9,285$ Field Rentals 47,421 Contracted Programs 26,270 TOTAL REVENUE 82,976$ FY 24/25 NET OPERATING COST 343,929$ Division Program/Camp Internal or Contracted Expenditures Revenue Profit/Loss Cost Recovery % CRC Summer Camp SPF Internal 200,972$ 220,776$ 19,804$ 109.9% CRC Fall Camp SPF Internal 5,590 8,805 3,215 157.5% CRC Winter Camp Internal 2,924 3,547 623 121.3% CRC Spring Camp SPF Internal 4,361 8,365 4,004 191.8% CRC Lego Camp Contracted 15,540 19,425 3,885 125.0% CRC I Can Too Inclusion Camps Internal 24,973 12,152 (12,821) 48.7% CRC Camps Total 254,360$ 273,070$ 18,710$ 107.4% CRC Pickleball Leagues Internal 3,571$ 33,422$ 29,851$ 935.9% CRC Trivia at the Community Center Internal 1,410 155 (1,255) 11.0% CRC Basketball Trips Internal 2,555 2,673 118 104.6% CRC Martial Arts Contracted 32,884 41,105 8,221 125.0% CRC Art Classes Contracted 36,565 45,707 9,142 125.0% CRC Pima Council on Aging Classes Contracted 4,402 6,289 1,887 142.9% CRC Classes & Programs Total 81,387$ 129,351$ 47,964$ 158.9% CRC Total Internal 246,356$ 289,895$ 43,539$ 117.7% CRC Total Contracted 89,391 112,526 23,135 125.9% CRC Total All 335,747$ 402,421$ 66,674$ 119.9% Rec & Culture STEAM Camp Internal 57,069$ 54,278$ (2,791)$ 95.1% Rec & Culture TGA Sports Camp Contracted 20,796 25,995 5,199 125.0% Rec & Culture Horse Camp Contracted 20,520 22,800 2,280 111.1% Rec & Culture Rodeo Break Camp Internal 1,962 1,750 (212) 89.2% Rec & Culture Spring Break Nature Camp Internal 5,316 5,445 129 102.4% Rec & Culture Fall Break Nature Camp Internal 5,650 5,115 (535) 90.5% Rec & Culture Winter Break Nature Camp Internal 3,332 3,300 (32) 99.0% Rec & Culture Camps Total 114,646$ 118,684$ 4,038$ 103.5% Rec & Culture OV Lacrosse Camp and League Contracted $ 3,647 5,210$ 1,563$ 142.9% Rec & Culture Team Dance Contracted 18,630 20,700 2,070 111.1% Rec & Culture Heirloom Farmers Market Contracted 6,916 5,298 (1,618) 76.6% Rec & Culture Senior Social Internal 1,462 - (1,462) 0.0% Rec & Culture Gadget Guidance Internal 795 - (795) 0.0% Rec & Culture Parents Night Out Internal 2,013 1,800 (213) 89.4% Rec & Culture Makers Market Internal 866 960 94 110.9% Rec & Culture Family Campout at the Ranch Internal 1,511 1,550 39 102.6% Rec & Culture Field Trips Internal 959 438 (521) 45.6% Rec & Culture Friday Night Concerts Internal 12,435 - (12,435) 0.0% Rec & Culture Second Saturday Internal 2,460 - (2,460) 0.0% Rec & Culture OV Hiking Series Internal 3,467 1,780 (1,687) 51.3% Rec & Culture Kids Dropoff Hiking Party Internal 262 170 (92) 64.9% Rec & Culture Senior Trips Internal 818 240 (578) 29.3% Rec & Culture Adult Kickball Internal 1,750 1,850 100 105.7% Rec & Culture Classes & Programs Total $ 57,990 $ 39,996 $ (17,995)69.0% Rec & Culture Total Internal 102,127$ 78,676$ (23,451)$ 77.0% Rec & Culture Total Contracted 70,509 80,004 9,494 113.5% Rec and Culture Total All 172,636$ 158,679$ (13,956)$ 91.9% OVAC Red Cross Classes Internal 3,402$ 4,250$ 848$ 124.9% OVAC Dive in Movie Internal 2,139 884 (1,255) 41.3% OVAC Total Internal 5,541$ 5,134$ (407)$ 92.7% OVAC Camp Splash Contracted 30,000$ 36,780$ 6,780$ 122.6% OVAC Total All 35,541$ 41,914$ 6,373$ 117.9% Department totals All Programs Offered 543,924$ 603,014$ 59,090$ 110.9% All Internal Programs 354,024$ 373,705$ 19,681$ 105.6% All Contracted Programs 189,900$ 229,310$ 39,409$ 120.8% All Camps 284,360$ 309,850$ 25,490$ 109.0% FY25 P&R Program Cost Recovery APPENDIX A Expenditures include direct Parks & Recreation department costs, such as staffing and supplies. Ancillary costs such as credit card processing fees, utility costs, insurance, etc. as well as costs for other departments or divisions such as Police, Economic Development, Communications, etc. are not included. Camps can be internal or contracted. The Appendix data comes from CivicRec and may differ slightly from Munis due to timing. Town of Oro Valley Recreational Amenities Financial Analysis April 8, 2026 2 Overview Strategic Plan project Scope of amenities Oro Valley Aquatic Center (OVAC) Oro Valley Community and Recreation Center (CRC) Golf Steam Pump Ranch Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve (VTNP) James D. Kreigh (JDK) Park Naranja Park Riverfront Park Revenue and expenditure data are for Fiscal Year (FY) 24/25 Overview (Continued) Focus on current costs; long-term expenses such as asset depreciation are not included Capital costs are noted separate from calculated net operating costs Results are not intended as a ranking of amenities or services Cost recovery factors include accessibility, community demand and strategic priorities Town budget and financial reporting are not delineated by individual park or amenity; professional judgement was utilized when precise figures were unavailable Operating expenditures are limited to those within Parks and Recreation Department budget SUMMARY OF ALL AMENITIES – FY 24/25 Amenity Total Expenditures Total Revenue Net Operating Cost Capital OVAC $1,631,707 $515,843 $1,115,864 - CRC 2,323,949 1,580,194 743,755 160,265 Golf 5,687,025 6,418,398 (731,373) 2,022,862 Steam Pump Ranch 675,323 115,519 559,803 378,216 VTNP 185,059 22,499 162,560 328,454 JDK Park 604,592 86,867 517,725 - Naranja Park 673,717 170,952 502,765 - Riverfront Park 426,905 82,976 343,929 - TOTAL $12,208,277 $8,993,248 $3,215,028 $2,889,797 * Golf net operating cost shown in parentheses indicates revenues exceeded expenditures by $731,373. Capital expenditures are reported separately and are not included in net operating cost figures. THANK YOU Questions or comments? Recreational Amenities Financial Analysis Town Council Regular Session A. Meeting Date:04/08/2026 Submitted By:Michelle Stine, Town Clerk's Office Department:Town Clerk's Office SUBJECT: Minutes - March 18, 2026 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommenda approval. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: N/A BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: N/A SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to approve (approve with the following changes) the March 18, 2026, minutes. Attachments 3-18-26 Draft Minutes D R A F T MINUTES ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION MARCH 18, 2026 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11000 N. LA CAÑADA DRIVE REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER Mayor Winfield called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Joseph C. Winfield, Mayor Melanie Barrett, Vice-Mayor Harry Greene, Councilmember Joyce Jones-Ivey, Councilmember Mary Murphy, Councilmember Josh Nicolson, Councilmember (Attended via Zoom) Elizabeth Robb, Councilmember PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Winfield led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS Town Clerk Mike Standish announced the upcoming Town meetings and events. MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS ON CURRENT EVENTS Councilmember Jones-Ivey recognized Vincent Payas, a freshman at Canyon Del Oro High School, for his outstanding academic excellence, dedication as a student athlete, strong character, and community efforts. Councilmember Jones-Ivey encouraged citizens to volunteer and participate in Amphi School District's Project Graduation events and fundraisers. Councilmember Murphy reported that she had attended the North Tucson Firefighters Association Local 3832, 2026 8th Annual Jose Samaniego Memorial Archery Shoot & BBQ, held on March 7, 2026. 3/18/26 Minutes, Oro Valley Town Council Regular Session 1 Vice Mayor Barrett reported that she had attended a ribbon-cutting event for Bloom Tea, a new Oro Valley business, and for Visiting Angels new business location. Mayor Winfield reported that he and other Councilmembers had attended a ribbon-cutting for a new restroom facility at the Oro Valley Community Center. The new restrooms were accessible from the exterior of the Community Center and would serve youth camp members and other visitors to the Oro Valley Community Center. TOWN MANAGER'S REPORT ON CURRENT EVENTS Town Manager Jeff Wilkins reported on the following upcoming events: Volunteer opportunity: Invasive Species Pull to be held on Friday, March 20, 2026 Celebrate OV Concert Series to be held on Friday, March 20, 2026 Oro Valley Easter Eggstravaganza to be held on Saturday, April 4, 2026 ORDER OF BUSINESS Mayor Winfield reviewed the order of business and stated that the order would stand as posted. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS There were no informational items. CALL TO AUDIENCE Oro Valley resident Teri Colmar voiced her concerns regarding the proposed development on Pusch View Lane and Oracle Road. Oro Valley resident Susannah Cameron-Crichton voiced her concerns regarding the light effects from the Center Pointe neon signs. Oro Valley resident Bill Garner voiced his concerns regarding Council direction to install a traffic signal light at Musette Drive and Tangerine Road. Oro Valley resident Dr. Paul Licker voiced his concerns regarding unleashed dogs at Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve, and the inappropriate use of bike lanes. PRESENTATIONS 1.Proclamation - International Dark Sky Week Mayor Winfield proclaimed April 13 - 20, 2026, as International Dark Sky Week in Oro Valley. Mr. Sam Miller, Vice Chair, Board of Directors, DarkSky International, Southern Arizona Chapter, accepted the proclamation. 2.Proclamation - Education and Sharing Day 3/18/26 Minutes, Oro Valley Town Council Regular Session 2 Mayor Winfield proclaimed March 29, 2026, as Education and Sharing Day in Oro Valley. Rabbi Ephraim Zimmerman and Rabbi Boruch Zimmerman accepted the proclamation. 3.Presentation and possible discussion regarding the Town's preliminary five-year financial forecast through FY 2030/2031 Chief Financial Officer Dave Gephart presented the Town's preliminary five-year financial forecast through FY 2030/2031 and included the following: Overview Capital project reduction of ($11.6M) achieved to balance the five-year forecast General Fund Sources - Assumptions General Fund Sources - Forecast General Fund Uses - Assumptions General Fund Uses - Forecast General Fund Forecast Highway Fund Sources - Assumptions Highway Fund Sources - Forecast Highway Fund Uses - Assumptions Highway Fund Uses - Forecast Highway Fund Forecast Community Center Fund Town Operations Sources - Assumptions Community Center Fund Town Operations Uses - Assumptions Community Center Fund Town Operations Sources & Uses - Forecast Community Center Fund Forecast Community Center Fund Golf Sources - Assumptions Community Center Fund Golf Uses - Assumptions Community Center Fund Golf- Forecast Capital Fund Sources - Assumptions Capital Fund Sources - Forecast Capital Fund Uses - Assumptions Capital Fund Uses - Forecast Capital Fund Forecast Projection of Fund Balances Over Forecast Oro Valley Reserves Relative to Peer Communities Total Non-Enterprise Debt Service Due By Year Forecast Risks & Limitations Discussion ensued among Council and staff regarding the Town's preliminary five-year financial forecast through FY 2030/2031. Mayor Winfield recessed the meeting at 7:33 p.m. Mayor Winfield reconvened the meeting at 7:49 p.m. CONSENT AGENDA A.Minutes - March 2 and March 4, 2026 B.Resolution No. (R)26-10, authorizing and approving an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) between the Town of Oro Valley and Pima County on behalf of the Pima County Elections Department to provide election services through December 31, 2029 3/18/26 Minutes, Oro Valley Town Council Regular Session 3 C.Resolution No. (R)26-11, authorizing and approving a renewal of the Arizona Mutual Aid Compact agreement between the Town of Oro Valley and the Arizona Department of Emergency and Military Affairs (DEMA) Motion by Mayor Joseph C. Winfield, seconded by Councilmember Harry Greene to approve Consent agenda items (A) - (C). Vote: 7 - 0 Carried REGULAR AGENDA 1.PUBLIC HEARING: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING AN APPLICATION FOR A SERIES 12 (RESTAURANT) LIQUOR LICENSE FOR HAPPY JOE'S PIZZA & ICE CREAM, LOCATED AT 11695 N. ORACLE RD, 85737 Mayor Winfield opened the public hearing. No comments were received. Mayor Winfield closed the public hearing. Town Clerk Mike Standish presented item #1. Motion by Councilmember Harry Greene, seconded by Councilmember Mary Murphy to recommend approval of the issuance of a Series 12 Liquor License to the Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses and Control for Carlos Andres Araujo for Happy Joe's Pizza & Ice Cream, located at 11695 N. Oracle Rd, 85737 Vote: 7 - 0 Carried 2.DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING THE TOURISM ADVISORY COMMISSION RANKINGS OF THE DRAFT ORO VALLEY LEISURE TRAVEL MANAGEMENT PLAN NON-OPERATING RECOMMENDATIONS Community and Economic Development Director Paul Melcher presented item #2 and included the following: Council Comment #1: Ranking by Focused Priorities Discussion ensued among Council and staff regarding the ranking by focused priorities. Motion by Vice-Mayor Melanie Barrett, seconded by Councilmember Mary Murphy to direct staff to return to both the Tourism Advisory Commission and Town Council with more information on each of the nine suggested priorities. This information should include specific project descriptions and scope of work, estimated costs, estimated return on investment, as well as some basic information, either qualitative or quantitative, regarding the projected or desired impact on tourism. Discussion continued among Council and staff regarding item #2. Motion by Vice-Mayor Melanie Barrett, seconded by Councilmember Mary Murphy to direct staff to return 3/18/26 Minutes, Oro Valley Town Council Regular Session 4 Motion by Vice-Mayor Melanie Barrett, seconded by Councilmember Mary Murphy to direct staff to return to both the Tourism Advisory Commission and Town Council with more information on each of the nine suggested priorities. This information should include specific project descriptions and scope of work, estimated costs, estimated return on investment, as well as some basic information, either qualitative or quantitative, regarding the projected or desired impact on tourism. Vote: 4 - 3 Carried OPPOSED: Mayor Joseph C. Winfield Councilmember Harry Greene Councilmember Joyce Jones-Ivey FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS There were no future agenda items requested. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Mayor Joseph C. Winfield, seconded by Councilmember Harry Greene to adjourn the meeting at 8:45 p.m. Vote: 7 - 0 Carried __________________________________________ Michelle Stine, MMC, CPM Deputy Town Clerk I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the regular session of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona held on the 18th day of March 2026. I further certify that the meeting was called and held and that a quorum was present. ___________________________________________ Michael Standish, MMC Town Clerk 3/18/26 Minutes, Oro Valley Town Council Regular Session 5 Town Council Regular Session B. Meeting Date:04/08/2026 Submitted By:David Gephart, Finance Department:Finance SUBJECT: Resolution No. (R)26-12, designating David Gephart as Chief Fiscal Officer, authorized to submit the Town's Annual Expenditure Limitation Report (AELR) to the State Auditor General for FY 26-27 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Arizona Revised Statutes Section 41-1279.07(E) requires each county, city, town and community college district to annually provide to the Auditor General, by July 31, the name of the Chief Fiscal Officer (CFO) the governing board designated to submit the current year's annual expenditure limitation report (AELR). Council's action approving the attached resolution designating David Gephart as the CFO authorized to submit the AELR satisfies this requirement. Council most recently took action on this item on April 16, 2025, for the 2025-2026 fiscal year. This item covers fiscal year 2026-2027. The AELR is prepared annually by the Town's independent auditors and is required to be filed with the Auditor General's Office by March 31 each year, or nine (9) months after fiscal year-end. The Town submitted its AELR for fiscal year 2025 prior to the March 31, 2026, deadline. BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: N/A SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to approve Resolution No. (R)26-12, designating David Gephart as Chief Fiscal Officer, authorized to submit the Town's annual expenditure limitation report (AELR) to the Auditor General for FY 26-27. Attachments (R)26-12 Resolution RESOLUTION NO. (R)26-12 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, DESIGNATING THE CHIEF FISCAL OFFICER FOR OFFICIALLY SUBMITTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2027 EXPENDITURE LIMITATION REPORT TO THE ARIZONA AUDITOR GENERAL WHEREAS, Pursuant to A.R.S. 41-1279.07(E), each county, city, town, and community college district is required to annually provide the Auditor General by July 31 the name of the Chief Fiscal Officer the governing board designated to submit the current year’s Annual Expenditure Limitation Report (AELR); and WHEREAS, the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, desires to designate David Gephart as the Town’s Chief Fiscal Officer. WHEREAS, Entities must submit an updated form and documentation for any changes in the individuals designated to file the AELR. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona as follows: SECTION 1. The recitals above are hereby incorporated as if fully set forth herein. SECTION 2. David Gephart is hereby designated as the Town’s Chief Fiscal Officer for purposes of submitting the fiscal year 2027 AELR to the Arizona Auditor General on the governing body’s behalf. SECTION 3. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. SECTION 4. All Oro Valley Resolutions, or Motions and parts of Resolutions or Motions of the Council in conflict with the provisions of this Resolution are hereby repealed. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, this 8th day of April, 2026. 2 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Joseph C. Winfield, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ______________________________ Michael Standish, Town Clerk Andy Votava, Legal Services Director Date: Date: Town Council Regular Session C. Meeting Date:04/08/2026 Submitted By:Mike Standish, Town Clerk's Office Department:Town Clerk's Office SUBJECT: Resolution No. (R)26-13, authorizing and approving an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) between the Town of Oro Valley and the Pima County Recorder's Office to provide election services through December 31, 2026 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The attached resolution authorizes and approves an IGA between the Town and the Pima County Recorder's Office to provide election services to the Town through December 31, 2026. BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: Arizona Revised Statutes, section 16-408(D), permits the governing body to enter into an agreement with the County Board of Supervisors and County Recorder for election services. The Town has utilized the services of the County Recorder's Office for its municipal elections since incorporation. The main services provided to the Town through this IGA include voter registration maintenance, early voting and early ballot signature verification. FISCAL IMPACT: A total of $12,900 was budgeted for the 2026 Primary and General Elections, to cover the costs expected to be incurred through this IGA with the Pima County Recorder's Office for services rendered to the Town. Estimated 2026 Election Costs per IGA with the Pima County Recorder's Office July 21, 2026 Primary Election $6,450 November 3, 2026 General Election $6,450 Total $12,900 SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to Approve Resolution No. (R)26-13, authorizing and approving an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) between the Town of Oro Valley and the Pima County Recorder's Office to provide election services to the Town through December 31, 2026. Attachments (R)26-13 IGA with Recorder's Office for Election Services Exhibit A - PC Recorder's Office IGA RESOLUTION NO. (R)26-13 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY AND PIMA COUNTY FOR USE OF THE REGISTRATION ROLLS AND OTHER ELECTION-RELATED SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE PIMA COUNTY RECORDER FROM MARCH 24, 2026 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2026, AND THROUGH COMPLETION OF ALL OBLIGATIONS AND ACTIVITIES CONTEMPLATED BY THIS INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT, PROVIDED THAT THE TERM SHALL CONTINUE THROUGH FINAL RESOLUTION OF ANY LEGAL CHALLENGE TO THE ELECTION WHEREAS, the Town of Oro Valley, pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) § 11-952, is authorized to enter into or renew agreements for joint and cooperative action with other public agencies; and WHEREAS, Pima County is authorized under A.R.S. §§ 16-205(C), 16-172, 16-405 et. seq., 16- 450, 11-251(3), 11-951 et. seq. to perform services regarding elections; and WHEREAS, pursuant to A.R.S. Title 9, Title 11 and Title 16, the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona is allowed to call for Elections; and WHEREAS, the Town desires to use the registration rolls and other election-related services provided by the Pima County Recorder for the Primary Election to be held on July 21, 2026, and for the General Election to be held on November 3, 2026; and WHEREAS, Pima County and the Town of Oro Valley have determined that the use of the services of the Pima County Recorder by the Town of Oro Valley is in the public interest and that Pima County agrees to provide said services. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, that: SECTION 1. That the Intergovernmental Agreement between the Town of Oro Valley and Pima County for Election Services, attached hereto as Exhibit “A”, is hereby approved. SECTION 2. That the Mayor of the Town of Oro Valley and other administrative officials are hereby authorized to take such steps as necessary to execute and implement the terms of the Intergovernmental Agreement. SECTION 4. All Oro Valley resolutions or motions and parts of resolutions or motions of the Council in conflict with the provision of this Resolution are hereby repealed. 2 SECTION 5. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Resolution, or the Intergovernmental Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit “A” is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this 8th day of April, 2026. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Joseph C. Winfield, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Michael Standish, Town Clerk Andy Votava, Legal Services Director Date:Date: 3 EXHIBIT “A” Town Council Regular Session 2. Meeting Date:04/08/2026 Requested by: Rosalyn Epting Submitted By:Rosalyn Epting, Parks and Recreation Department:Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION TO INCREASE FUNDING AUTHORIZATION FOR THE VISTOSO TRAILS NATURE PRESERVE POND PROJECT AS IT RELATES TO SCOPE OF WORK FOR THE BID THAT WAS RECEIVED ON MARCH 20, 2026 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Council discuss funding options for the Pond Bid at the Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve and allocate the appropriate funding if it so desires. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On March 20, 2026, bids were opened for the Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve (VTNP) pond, with the lowest bid amount of $1,883,939, excluding contingency. This amount includes: Base Bid (Pond + Memorial Garden): $1,769,972 Alternate Bid (Parking Lot + ADA Pathway Connection): $113,967 The total project budget that was allocated by Town Council for the Desert Ecosystem Restoration Project, now including the pond element, was $2,000,000, of which $427,460 has been encumbered for the design of the revegetation of the VTNP property, as well as the pond. The remaining available construction budget for the pond is $1,572,540. After accounting for project costs and a contingency, as well as removing the $50,000 cost estimate for the Memorial Garden that will be funded by the proceeds from the sale of the donated Zimerman house, a funding shortfall of $461,399 exists. Details are provided in the background section below. BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: The total Desert Ecosystem Restoration Project, including the pond element, has a budget of $2,000,000, with $427,460 allocated for prior and current design work, leaving $1,572,540 available for construction. The total bid (base + alternate) is $1,883,939. Of this amount: The Memorial Garden is estimated at $50,000, which will be funded through proceeds from the sale of the donated Zimerman home, per Ms. Zimerman's instructions. With the Memorial Garden cost removed and a contingency added, the adjusted total project cost is $2,033,939. The lowest bid received results in a budget shortfall of $461,399. The bid includes: Base Bid: Pond and Memorial Garden Alternate Bid: Parking lot and ADA pathway connection Below is a map of the pond and Memorial Garden base bid in red and the parking lot with the ADA pathway connection bid alternate in orange. No additional project elements were included in this bid, including those represented in yellow. The specifics of the pond and Memorial Garden base bid include: The alternate bid for the parking lot and ADA connection to the existing pathways includes: The Memorial Garden was approved as part of the gift agreement associated with the donated Zimerman home. The agreement specifies the funds to be allocated towards the following improvements: Memorial Garden dedicated to Adam Zimerman: Installation of shade trees with seating stones A bike rack A plaque commemorating Adam Zimerman A water station with bottle-filling capability Use of remaining funds discussed and approved at the June 18, 2025, Town Council meeting: Path widening with decomposed granite to improve user flow where cyclists and pedestrians interact Additional tree planting to enhance shade Revegetation efforts using native Sonoran Desert grasses and plants, to initiate habitat restoration Council has a few options regarding funding the budget shortfall to consider: Option 1: Approve Base Bid + Alternate Bid Total Project Cost (with contingency): $2,033,939 Available Budget: $1,572,540 Shortfall: $461,399 Base Bid (Pond and Memorial Garden Included) $1,769,972 Alternate Bid (Parking Lot and ADA Connection to Existing Pathway) $113,967 Total with Alternate $1,883,939 Memorial Garden will be paid out of the donated home ($50K is the estimated cost) - $50,000 Contingency $200,000 Grand Total with Contingency $2,033,939 Budget Remaining $1,572,540 BUDGET SHORTFALL -$461,399 Funding Options: (a) General Fund Contingency Account: $461,399 OR (b) Combination: $150,000 (FY 2025/26 CIP – VTNP Site Improvements) $200,000 (FY 2026/27 CIP – VTNP Site Improvements) $111,399 (General Fund Contingency) Option 2: Approve Base Bid Only (No Alternate) Total Project Cost (with contingency): $1,894,972 Available Budget: $1,572,540 Shortfall: $322,432 Base Bid (Pond and Memorial Garden Included) $1,769,972 Memorial Garden will be paid out of the donated home ($50K is the estimated cost) - $50,000 Total with Alternate $1,719,972 Contingency $175,000 Grand Total with Contingency $1,894,972 Budget Remaining $1,572,540 BUDGET SHORTFALL -$322,432 Funding Options: (a) General Fund Contingency Account: $322,432 OR (b) CIP Funds: $150,000 (FY 2025/26 CIP – VTNP Site Improvements) $172,432 (FY 2026/27 CIP – VTNP Site Improvements) Remaining FY 2026/27 CIP balance: $27,568 FISCAL IMPACT: Base + Alternate: Requires $461,399 in additional funding Base Only: Requires $322,432 in additional funding The funding source selected by Council will determine the impact on the General Fund Contingency and/or CIP budgets. SUGGESTED MOTION: Option 1 – Base + Alternate Bid: I MOVE to authorize and approve funding for the base bid and alternate bid for the Pond Project in the amount of $461,399 from either: A.) The General Fund Contingency Account OR B.) A combination of funding sources as follows: $150,000 from FY2026 CIP Fund $200,000 from FY2027 CIP Fund $111,399 from the General Fund Contingency Account Option 2 – Base Bid Only: I MOVE to authorize and approve funding for the base bid for the Pond Project in the amount of $322,432 from either: A.) The General Fund Contingency Account OR B.) CIP funding as follows: $150,000 from FY2026 CIP Fund $172,432 from FY2027 CIP Fund Attachments Staff Presentation Funding Authorization for the Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve Pond Project April 8, 2026 Bid Items Red – Base Bid $1,769,972 Pond Zimerman Memorial Garden with connection to pathway Orange – Alternate Bid $113,967 Parking lot and connection to pathway Total Base Bid + Alternate Bid $1,883,939 No other sections included in the bid Project Budget $2,000,000 Design Costs $427,460 Remaining Budget $1,572,540 Options Base Bid (Pond and Memorial Garden Included)$1,769,972 Alternate Bid (Parking Lot and ADA Connection to Existing Pathway) $113,967 Total with Alternate $1,883,939 Memorial Garden will be paid out of the donated home ($50K is an estimate of cost) - $50,000 Contingency $200,000 Grand Total with Contingency $2,033,939 Budget Remaining $1,572,540 BUDGET SHORTFALL -$461,399 Base Bid (Pond and Memorial Garden Included)$1,769,972 Memorial Garden will be paid out of the donated home ($50K is an estimate of cost) -$50,000 Total with Alternate $1,719,972 Contingency $175,000 Grand Total with Contingency $1,894,972 Budget Remaining $1,572,540 BUDGET SHORTFALL -$322,432 Option 2: Base Bid OnlyOption 1: Base Bid + Alternate Bid Actions Item – Additional Funding Options Option 1 – Base + Alternate Bid $461,399: A.)The General Fund Contingency Account OR B.)A combination of funding sources as follows: $150,000 from FY2026 CIP Fund (VTNP Site Improvements) $200,000 from FY2027 CIP Fund (VTNP Site Improvements) $111,399 from the General Fund Contingency Account Option 2 – Base Bid Only $322,432: A.)The General Fund Contingency Account OR B.)CIP funding as follows: $150,000 from FY2026 CIP Fund (VTNP Site Improvements) $172,432 from FY2027 CIP Fund (VTNP Site Improvements) Town Council Regular Session 3. Meeting Date:04/08/2026 Requested by: Paul Keesler Submitted By:Paul Keesler, Public Works Department:Public Works SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE NO. (O)26-06, DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION TO ALLOW THE TOWN ENGINEER AND CHIEF OF POLICE THE AUTHORITY TO TEMPORARILY SUSPEND NO PARKING SIGN RESTRICTIONS ON PUBLIC STREETS FOR SPECIAL EVENTS RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council adopt the additional Town Code language delegating authority to the Town Engineer and Chief of Police to be able to temporally suspend No Parking sign restrictions on public streets for special events. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: During a recent request by a Town special event at JDK Park to suspend the No Parking restrictions along Calle Concordia by CDO HS, staff discovered that it does not have said authorization via the Town Code. This Ordinance request will revise the Town Code allowing the Town Engineer and Chief of Police the authority to temporarily suspend No Parking sign restrictions on public streets for special events. BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: Historically, special events at JDK Park, Aquatics Center, CDO High School, etc. would request the suspension of the longstanding No Parking restrictions along the adjacent right-of-way (ROW). The purpose was to allow for additional parking that a facility could not accommodate onsite for said special events. Typically, a request would be submitted to the Police Department and Public Works. If there is agreement on the need for action, then Public Works would place covers (otherwise referred to as "bagging") over the No Parking signs to suspend their regulatory authority. This is a long-standing practice that precedes current staff. However, after placing the new No Parking signs in and around the Calle Buena Vista and Calle Concordia area, and shortly thereafter receiving a request from OVCN to bag these signs, staff discovered that it does not have the specific authority within the Town Code to "bag" signs. Only Council has the authority to place or remove restrictions within the ROW. Since it would not be practical to bring every request forward to the Town Council, and this is a longstanding practice, staff is requesting that the Town Code be updated (Existing code in normal text, new code Italianized and bold) 11-4-2 Authority to Erect Signs Restricting Parking. A. Pursuant to ARS 28-643 and within the reasonable exercise of the Oro Valley Police power, the local authority shall place and maintain the traffic control devices on highways under their jurisdiction as they deem necessary to indicate and to carry out local traffic ordinances or to regulate, warn or guide traffic. All traffic control devices erected shall conform to the manual and specifications prescribed in ARS 28-641. B. The Police Chief or Town Engineer, upon approval by the Council, may erect signs requiring parking at an angle to the curb, allowing parking on the left hand curb on one-way streets, notifying drivers that parking is prohibited, and restricting parking in any way that may be necessary. No parking restrictions shall become effective until such restricted parking area is specifically designated by resolution of the Council and signs have been erected or written notice given as authorized by this Section; provided, that all signs restricting parking now in place are hereby ratified and approved as so placed. It is a civil traffic violation for any person to stop or stand a vehicle in disobedience to such parking restrictions. C. In lieu of providing signage, the Town may attach a written notice to the owner of record of the vehicle, giving the responsible individual twenty-four (24) hours to remove the vehicle. ((O)01-01, 01/17/2001) D. Under special circumstances, such as a special event, a landowner (or special event coordinator) may request that No-Parking signs and associated restrictions on public streets, within a 1,000-foot radius of their property, be temporarily suspended via “bagging”, subject to the following: 1. An application request is submitted to the Town Engineer that specifies: a. Date(s)/Time(s) of the special event, the anticipated attendance and number of vehicles anticipated requiring parking, and the capacity of their own facilities to accommodate said parking. b. Written proof that the landowner (or special event coordinator) has reached out to all private, governmental, or religious entities who themselves own parking facilities, within 1,000-feet of the subject property, and have been denied use of these facilities for the specified special event. c. The application will not be considered complete without all the afore mentioned information contained within. 2. The Town Engineer and the Police Chief will consider a completed application, and upon consultation with each other, either approve or deny based on public safety concerns. 3. If the application is approved, the Town Engineer will have the authority to “bag” the specified No-Parking signs, thus temporarily suspending the No-Parking restriction until the special event is over and the bags are removed. This new code will create both the authority and a process in which decisions for bagging No Parking signs will not be arbitrary. FISCAL IMPACT: None SUGGESTED MOTION: I Move to (Approve or Deny) Ordinance No. (O)26-06, allowing the Town Engineer and Chief of Police the authority to temporarily suspend No Parking restrictions on public streets for special events. Attachments (O)26-06 Temporarily Suspend No-Parking Restrictions Staff Presentation ORDINANCE NO. (O)26-06 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, AMENDING ORO VALLEY TOWN CODE SECTION 11-4-2, AUTHORITY TO ERRECT SIGNS RESTRICTING PARKING, IN ORDER TO GRANT THE TOWN ENGINEER AND CHIEF OF POLICE THE AUTHORITY TO TEMPORARILY SUSPEND NO- PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON PUBLIC STREETS FOR SPECIAL EVENTS WHEREAS, on September 27, 1989, the Mayor and Council adopted Ordinance (O) 89- 21, adopting that certain document entitled “Oro Valley Town Code” (OVTC); and WHEREAS, OVTC Section 11-4-2, Authority to Erect Signs Restricting Parking, controls the procedures by which the Town may erect signs restricting parking on public streets; and WHEREAS, historically, special event organizers would make requests to the Town to temporarily suspend parking restrictions adjacent to their property to allow for additional parking that their property could not accommodate on site for special events and, if Town staff agreed it was necessary, Town staff would place bags over nearby no-parking signs to temporarily suspend their regulatory authority; and WHEREAS, it was recently realized by Town staff that no authority exists in OVTC for them to accommodate requests of this nature; and WHEREAS, in order to grant the Town Engineer and Chief of Police the authority to temporarily suspend no-parking restrictions on public streets for special events, it is necessary to amend OVTC Section 11-4-2, Authority to Erect Signs Restricting Parking, as shown in the attached Exhibit “A”. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona that: SECTION 1. OVTC Section 11-4-2, Authority to Erect Signs Restricting Parking, is hereby amended as shown in the attached Exhibit “A”. SECTION 2. All Oro Valley Ordinances, Resolutions, or Motions and parts of Ordinances, Resolutions or Motions of the Council in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. SECTION 3. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. 2 SECTION 4. In compliance with ARS § 9-802, the exhibits to this Ordinance are on file at the Town Clerk’s Office. PASSED AND ADOPTED by Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, this 8th day of April, 2026. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Joseph C. Winfield, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Michael Standish, Town Clerk Andrew Votava, Interim Legal Services Director Date:Date: 3 Exhibit “A” 4 11-4-2 Authority to Erect Signs Restricting Parking. A. Pursuant to ARS 28-643 and within the reasonable exercise of the Oro Valley Police power, the local authority shall place and maintain the traffic control devices on highways under their jurisdiction as they deem necessary to indicate and to carry out local traffic ordinances or to regulate, warn or guide traffic. All traffic control devices erected shall conform to the manual and specifications prescribed in ARS 28-641. B. The Police Chief or Town Engineer, upon approval by the Council, may erect signs requiring parking at an angle to the curb, allowing parking on the left hand curb on one- way streets, notifying drivers that parking is prohibited, and restricting parking in any way that may be necessary. No parking restrictions shall become effective until such restricted parking area is specifically designated by resolution of the Council and signs have been erected or written notice given as authorized by this Section; provided, that all signs restricting parking now in place are hereby ratified and approved as so placed. It is a civil traffic violation for any person to stop or stand a vehicle in disobedience to such parking restrictions. C. In lieu of providing signage, the Town may attach a written notice to the owner of record of the vehicle, giving the responsible individual twenty-four (24) hours to remove the vehicle. D. UNDER SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES, SUCH AS A SPECIAL EVENT, A LANDOWNER (OR SPECIAL EVENT COORDINATOR) MAY REQUEST THAT NO-PARKING SIGNS AND ASSOCIATED RESTRICTIONS ON PUBLIC STREETS, WITHIN A 1,000-FOOT RADIUS OF THEIR PROPERTY, BE TEMPORARILY SUSPENDED VIA “BAGGING”, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING: 1. AN APPLICATION REQUEST IS SUBMITTED TO THE TOWN ENGINEER THAT SPECIFIES: A. DATE(S)/TIME(S) OF THE SPECIAL EVENT, THE ANTICIPATED ATTENDANCE AND NUMBER OF VEHICLES ANTICIPATED REQUIRING PARKING, AND THE CAPACITY OF THEIR OWN FACILITIES TO ACCOMMODATE SAID PARKING. B. WRITTEN PROOF THAT THE LANDOWNER (OR SPECIAL EVENT COORDINATOR) HAS REACHED OUT TO ALL PRIVATE, GOVERNMENTAL, OR RELIGIOUS ENTITIES WHO THEMSELVES OWN PARKING FACILITIES, WITHIN 1,000-FEET OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, AND HAVE BEEN DENIED USE OF THESE FACILITIES FOR THE SPECIFIED SPECIAL EVENT. C. THE APPLICATION WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED COMPLETE WITHOUT ALL THE AFORE MENTIONED INFORMATION CONTAINED WITHIN. 2. THE TOWN ENGINEER AND THE POLICE CHIEF WILL CONSIDER A COMPLETED APPLICATION, AND UPON CONSULTATION WITH EACH OTHER, EITHER APPROVE OR DENY BASED ON PUBLIC SAFETY CONCERNS. 5 3. IF THE APPLICATION IS APPROVED, THE TOWN ENGINEER WILL HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO “BAG” THE SPECIFIED NO-PARKING SIGNS, THUS TEMPORARILY SUSPENDING THE NO-PARKING RESTRICTION UNTIL THE SPECIAL EVENT IS OVER AND THE BAGS ARE REMOVED. Bagging No-Parking Signs Supplement to Town Code Section 11-4-2 April 8, 2026 Town Code 11-4-2 Town Code, Section 11-4-2 establishes the Authority to Erect Signs Restricting Parking. Due to recent questions, would like to approach this evening as more of a study session to receive Council feedback, unless Council is ready to accept. For consideration, additional ordinance language should create a process that is purposeful and not arbitrary. Suggested process within the code language should be defined as: Under special circumstances only Only bag within a 1,000-foot radius of the applicant’s property Only if they have been denied use of other parking facilities within 1000ft of their property Allows the Town Engineer and the Police Chief to confer and consider a complete application, and upon consultation with each other, either approve or deny based on public safety concerns only. Discussion –why bring this forward Due to a recent request to temporally remove the no-parking restrictions within the newly established Calle Concordia/Buena Vista area, staff has discovered that there are no provisions within the Town Code to override Council established traffic control measures. The practice of “bagging” No -Parking signs for the purpose of temporally removing parking restrictions has apparently been performed informally for over 20-years. This Ordinance request will revise the Town Code allowing the Town Engineer and Chief of Police the authority to temporarily suspend No-Parking restrictions on public streets under special circumstances. This Ordinance will also provide formalized criteria, defining a process for this temporary restriction removal, eliminating the appearance of arbitrary decision making. D.Under special circumstances, such as a special event, a landowner (or special event coordinator) may request that No-Parking signs and associated restrictions on public streets, within a 1,000-foot radius of their property, be temporarily suspended via “bagging”, subject to the following: 1.An application request is submitted to the Town Engineer that specifies: A.Date(s)/Time(s) of the special event, the anticipated attendance and number of vehicles anticipated requiring parking, and the capacity of their own facilities to accommodate said parking. B.Written proof that the landowner (or special event coordinator) has reached out to all private, governmental, or religious entities who themselves own parking facilities, within 1,000-feet of the subject property, and have been denied use of these facilities for the specified special event. C.The application will not be considered complete without all the afore mentioned information contained within. 2.The Town Engineer and the Police Chief will consider a completed application, and upon consultation with each other, either approve or deny based on public safety concerns. 3.If the application is approved, the Town Engineer will have the authority to “bag” the specified No-Parking signs, thus temporarily suspending the No-Parking restriction until the special event is over and the bags are removed. Suggested Code Language Subsequent Questions & Concerns Have received questions: Is there a definition for a Special Event –Yes, Town Code, Section 8-3-1.B.3 Is there an Appeal Process for the decision of the Town Engineer –Yes, Town Council Is there a public notification process –No, not within the suggested code language, but it could be added. For public notification, we could utilize the same process as used by the Extended Construction Hours Work Permit, TC Section 6-6-2.F. Applicability of requesting “Bagging” of signs: As identified within the code language –Under special circumstances, such as a special event. Special Circumstances is not limited to just code defined special events. It could also be used for major roadwork within a subdivision, an event at a public school that is not covered by code, an emergency situation such as a water main break or clearing drainage damage or multiple simultaneous events that need safe parking accommodations. Special Circumstances is defined as one-off events, not regular activities such as church services, that require parking accommodations on an adjacent public street that has parking restrictions. Town Council Regular Session 4. Meeting Date:04/08/2026 Submitted By:David Gephart, Finance Department:Finance SUBJECT: DIRECTION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE'S FAILURE TO TIMELY AMEND THE ORO VALLEY MODEL TAX CODE THEREBY VOIDING THE ACTION OF COUNCIL ON JANUARY 14, 2026 AS IT RELATES TO THE USE TAX RECOMMENDATION: N/A - this item is for informational purposes only. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: N/A BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: Town staff has been informed by the Arizona Department of Revenue (AzDOR) that Ordinance No.(O)26-02, passed by Town Council on January 14, 2026, was not changed in the "official copy of the model city tax code" within the 10-day period specified in ARS 42-6052(I)1 and 2. Therefore, Ordinance No. (O)26-02 is void and has no effect. Below is a history of relevant communications with the Arizona Department of Revenue: History of Relevant Communications Regarding Use Tax with Arizona Department of Revenue: October 15, 2025 – Notified Arizona Department of Revenue of potential tax code changes. January 8, 2026 – Provided draft ordinance and associated red-line exhibits to Arizona Department of Revenue January 14, 2026 – Use Tax Ordinance No. (O)26-02 passed by Town Council January 20, 2026 – Ordinance No. (O)26-02 signed and executed by all necessary signatories January 22, 2026 – Executed Ordinance No.(O)26-02 emailed to Arizona Department of Revenue February 26, 2026 – Received notice from Arizona Department of Revenue that Form 5021 was not submitted, therefore causing a delay in processing and “confusion” in their review. Staff was informed Ordinance No. (O)26-02 would need to be re-signed and re-submitted. March 2, 2026 – Town staff emailed Arizona Department of Revenue and inquired why the executed use tax ordinance would need to be re-signed and re-submitted. Form 5021 was completed and emailed to the Arizona Department of Revenue as requested. March 6, 2026 – Arizona Department of Revenue insists that Ordinance No.(O)26-02 would need to be re-signed and re-submitted. They copied and pasted ARS 42-6052(I)1 and 2 as their reply. March 9, 2026 – After discussing with legal counsel, staff re-signed (backdated) and re-submitted Form 5021 in lieu of re-signing and re-submitting Ordinance No. (O)26-02. March 13, 2026 – A meeting request was received by Town staff from the general counsel and assistant director of Arizona Department of Revenue. March 23, 2026 – Town Legal Director and Chief Financial Officer met remotely with Arizona Department of Revenue general counsel and assistant director. During the meeting, the Arizona Department of Revenue took the position that the Town now needs to present a replacement use tax Department of Revenue took the position that the Town now needs to present a replacement use tax ordinance before Town Council for re-approval. To summarize, Town staff filed Ordinance No. (O)26-02 within the 10-day timeframe requirements of ARS 42-6052, notifying the Arizona Department of Revenue 8 days after passage. Further, AzDOR even had pre-notification on January 8 of the draft ordinance and proposed changes to the Oro Valley tax code. Finally, at no point in the process did AzDOR communicate with staff how much time they needed to effectuate such a change. Despite the tax code changes being boilerplate use tax language applicable to all cities/towns statewide, the Arizona Department of Revenue failed in its duty to make necessary changes to the official copy of the model city tax code according to Arizona law. Due to this circumstance, it is necessary to repost the public notification of a potential tax change and for the Town Council to re-adopt its intent. Staff intends to bring this item back to Town Council at its June 17, 2026, meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to authorize the Town to begin the process of passing the Use Tax again. Attachments No file(s) attached. Town Council Regular Session 2. Meeting Date:04/08/2026 Submitted By:Mike Standish, Town Clerk's Office Department:Town Clerk's Office SUBJECT: *Pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.03(A)(1) and (A)(3) Personnel matter - Town Magistrate annual performance review RECOMMENDATION: N/A EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: N/A BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: N/A SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to go into Executive Session. Attachments No file(s) attached. Town Council Regular Session 5. Meeting Date:04/08/2026 Submitted By:Mike Standish, Town Clerk's Office Department:Town Clerk's Office SUBJECT: *APPROVAL OF ANY DIRECTION TO THE TOWN ATTORNEY AND/OR NECESSARY STAFF AS DISCUSSED IN EXECUTIVE SESSION PERTAINING TO THE ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW OF THE TOWN MAGISTRATE RECOMMENDATION: N/A EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: N/A BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: N/A SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to... Attachments No file(s) attached.